The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2/9/1993� MINUTESTACIIED = BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA AGENDA REGULAR MEETING TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 9, 1993 9:00 A.M. - COUNTY COMMISSION CHAMBER COUNTY ADMINISTRATION BUILDING 1840 25TH STREET VERO BEACH, FLORIDA COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Richard N. Bird, Chairman (Dist. 5) John W. Tippin, Vice Chairman (Dist. 4) Fran B. Adams ( Dist. 1) Carolyn K. Eggert ( Dist. 2 ) Kenneth R. Macht (Dist. 3) 9: 00 A. M. 1. CALL TO ORDER 2. INVOCATION - None James E. Chandler, County Administrator Charles P. Vitunac, County Attorney Jeffrey K. Barton, Clerk to the Board 3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE - James E. Chandler 4. ADDITIONS TO THE AGENDA/ EMERGENCY ITEMS Item 7.L. Appt. to Land Acquisition Advisory Committee Item 7.M. Two Appts. to Beach Restoration Advisory Commission Item 7.N. Appt. to Planning & Zoning Commission Item 13.E. Out -of -County Travel to Treasure Coast Legislative Conference, March 1-3, 1993 S. PROCLAMATION AND PRESENTATIONS None 6. APPROVAL OF MINUTES A. Regular Meeting of 12/22/92 B. Regular Meeting of 1/5/93 C. Special Meeting of 1/7/93 7. CONSENT AGENDA A. Proclamation Designating March 4 - 6, 1993 as Mentally Handicapped Week B. Proclamation Designation February, 1993 as Florida Grapefruit Month C. Resolution Supporting Preservation 2000 Funding ( memorandum dated February 1, 1993 ) D. Release of County Assessment Liens ( memorandum dated January 27, 1993 ) E. Release of Utility Liens ( memorandum dated January 29, 1993 ) IF E 91993 BOOK 88 Fa;F 7619 BOOK 88 PKU 77® -7 7. CONSENT AGENDA (cont'd.) : F. Ordinance Amending Section 307.02 Concerning Parking Spaces for Certain Handicapped Persons Request for Public Hearing ( memorandum dated February 2, 1993 ) G. Ordinance Amending Section 100.05, IRC Code to Make the General Penalty Provisions Applicable to Ordinances Prior to Codification ( memorandum dated February 2, 1993 ) H. Subordination of County Lien Impact Fee Extension Agreement ( memorandum dated January 27, 1993 ) I. Cancellation of Outstanding Taxes Property Purchased for County Use ( memorandum dated January 27, 1993 ) J. Amendment to FIND Grant Agreement for Environmental Learning Center ( memorandum dated February 2, 1993 ) K. Reclaimed Water Ordinance Proposed I.R.C. Ordinance, Chapter 202 ( memorandum dated January 25, 1993 ) 8. CONSTITUTIONAL OFFICERS AND GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES None 9:05 a.m. 9. PUBLIC ITEMS A. PUBLIC DISCUSSION ITEMS None B. PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. Paving E Drainage Improvements to 91st Ave. Between 79th St. 8 87th St. in Vero Lake Estates Subdivision ( memorandum dated January 20, 1993 ) 2. Indian River County's Request for Special Exception Use Approval to Construct an Elevated Water Storage Facility ( memorandum dated January 27, 1993 ) 10. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S MATTERS Property Exchange with Town of Indian River Shores (memorandum dated January 29, 1993) 11. DEPARTMENTAL MATTERS A. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Approval of Hearing Dates for Two Evening Board Hearings to Consider LDR Amendments ( memorandum dated January 28, 1993 ) 11. DEPARTMENTAL MATTERS (cont'd. ): B. EMERGENCY SERVICES None C. GENERAL SERVICES 1. New Judicial Complex Properties ( memorandum dated February 2, . 1993 ) 2. First United Methodist Church Property ( memorandum dated February 2, 1993 ) D. LEISURE SERVICES None E. OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET [.. 1 — F. PERSONNEL None G. PUBLIC WORKS 1. T.C.I. Cablevision Request for County Road & Bridge Division Assistance in Planting Washingtonian Palms within SR60 Median (memorandum dated January 29, 1993) 2. FDOT Local Government Cooperative Assis- tance Program - 41st St. E 45th St. (memorandum dated January 28, 1993) 3. Purchase Authorization; 45th St. R -O -W Acquisition, Virginia Russell, Two Parcels ( memorandum dated January 28, 1993 ) H. UTILITIES 1. Back-up for Effluent Disposal System West Regional Wastewater Treatment Plant to Deep Well Reclaimed Water Pipeline ( memorandum dated January 27, 1993 ) 2. 34th Ave. /Pinewood Estates Water Service Resolutions I and II ( memorandum dated January 29, 1993 ) 12. COUNTY ATTORNEY Draft Letter Re: Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council 13. COMMISSIONERS ITEMS A. CHAIRMAN RICHARD N. BIRD A Resolution of the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida, Endorsing Dredging of Port of Fort Pierce FEB 91993 BooK 88 F'1uC 77� F F E B 9 1993 BOOK 88 PAGE 1 1 13. COMMISSIONERS ITEMS (cont'd. ): B. VICE CHAIRMAN JOHN W. TIPPIN C. COMMISSIONER FRAN B. ADAMS D. COMMISSIONER CAROLYN K. EGGERT E. COMMISSIONER KENNETH R. MACHT 14. SPECIAL DISTRICTS A. EMERGENCY SERVICES DISTRICT None B. SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL DISTRICT 1. Approval of Minutes - Meeting of 12/22/92 2. Approval of Minutes - Meeting of 1/5/93 3. Full Cost Accounting 8 Annual Report ( memorandum dated January 27, 1993 ) 4. Waste Stream S Assessment Study Malcolm Pirnie (memorandum dated January 12, 1993) 15. ADJOURNMENT ANYONE WHO MAY WISH TO APPEAL ANY DECISION WHICH MAY BE MADE AT THIS MEETING WILL NEED TO ENSURE THAT A VERBATIM RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS IS MADE WHICH INCLUDES THE TESTIMONY AND EVIDENCE UPON WHICH THE APPEAL WILL BE BASED. ANYONE WHO NEEDS A SPECIAL ACCOMMODATION FOR THIS MEETING MAY CONTACT THE COUNTY'S AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT (ADA) COORDINATOR AT 567-8000 X 408 AT LEAST 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE OF MEETING. r � � Tuesday, February 9, 1993 The Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida met in Regular Session at the County Commission Chambers, 1840 25th Street, Vero Beach, Florida on Tuesday, February 9, 1993, at 9:00 A. M. Present were Richard N. Bird, Chairman; John W. Tippin, Vice Chairman; Fran B. Adams; Carolyn K. Eggert; and Kenneth R. Macht. Also present were James E. Chandler, County Administrator; Charles P. Vitunac, County Attorney; and Patricia Held, Deputy Clerk. The Chairman called the meeting to order. County Administrator James E. Chandler led the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag. ADDITIONS TO THE AGENDA/EMERGENCY ITEMS Commissioner Macht requested the addition of Consent Agenda Item 7.L., appointment to the Land Acquisition Advisory Committee and Item 13.E., out -of -county travel to attend the Treasure Coast Legislative Conference March 1-3, 1993. Commissioner Adams requested the addition of Consent Agenda Item 7.M., two appointments to the Beach Restoration Advisor Commission. Chairman Bird requested the addition of Consent Agenda Item 7.N., appointment to the Planning & Zoning Commission. ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by Commissioner Macht, the Board unanimously added the above items to the Agenda. APPROVAL OF MINUTES The Chairman asked if there were any additions or corrections to the Minutes of the Regular Meeting of December 22, 1992. There were none. ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by Commissioner Adams, the Board approved the Minutes of the Regular Meeting of December 22, 1992 as written. L_FEB 9 1993 J Boon 88 PnF 774-7 The Chairman asked if there were any additions or corrections to the Minutes of the Regular Meeting of January 5, 1993. There were none. ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED by Commissioner Eggert, the Board approved the Minutes of the Regular Meeting of January 5, 1993 as written. The Chairman asked if there were any additions or corrections to the Minutes of the Special Meetings of January 7, 1993. There were none. ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED by Commissioner Macht, the Board approved the Minutes of the Special Meeting of January 7, 1993 as written. CONSENT AGENDA Commissioner Eggert requested removal of Item 7.F., for comment. A. Proclamation Designating March 4-6 1993 as Mentally Handicapped Week Chairman Bird read aloud the following Proclamation: 2 N PROCLPMATION PROCLAMATION OF T11k: IHUARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, F1.011JDA, DESIGNATING MARC11 4 THROUGII 1,1ARC'N 6, 39913 AS MENTALLY 11ANDICAPPED WREX WITEREAS, the Kidgbts of Columbus, Vero Beach Council 5629, will he c or,ducti ng its at,nual Toatr J p Roll. Drive to bele the hancii.capped and mel,tal.ly retarded citizens, on Match 4 through March 6, 1993; and WITFF.1?AS, prose nds from the donat3 ons will be, usect by the Kn3 ghts of Columbus for local programs and activities such as the mentally re:t.aided workshop and special alympics program; and WITERFAS, on a nat•3at,wi.cde• basis, the Knights of Columbus Councils will Im conduct 3 lig si mi l tar e•veetnts caul i ng the same -time. spat,; and WHEREAS, with the )'0I) of many fi i e-llcis and local organizat3ons who have volunteered to assist. t -he Knights of Colund,us 3 n th3 s year's el,cleavcr, it Js hni.i ci Ilate•d that t -he proceeds generated will be far iii excess of last year's total; and WIIERLAS, it iS altoye1.11el fitt-iny at,cl to officially riecuyni ze this worthy cause, and to bells trent:(- a 111'1,3 i c iawal e'l,e- ss zil,(I a1-1`2vci i,t i c,l, fC,l all t he-jG( -4-bo will },p "app or,e-d and C:aid sterei(I" e,l, March 4 tbI C�vcjb r1i,rch 6, 3993 and n,c►st. of all, fol. &J.l Ulm -4e- w),c, W333 ror,t:ril-,nt a whit. tl,e•y cats from their hearts and ljocket s to assist. t.l(e, mentally bandi capped; NOW, THER.EFOPE, BF IT P1:0CLAI MM) HY I'll)-: HOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF' INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that rlarch 4 through March 6, 1993 he officially observed as MENTALLY HANDICAPPED WF.FR in Inrlia.n. Itivta• County, and that. special rem)(jr,3.1ian be given to the dates of r1arch 4 through March 6, 1993 in support of this- Wort.hwhi J e el,,deavor. . Adopted this 91.1, clay of Febxv ary, 1993. FOAF-1) OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA JAY HJ CHARD N. BIRO, CHAIRMAN 3 L_FEB 9 1993 1 Bom 88 PA.,;E 775 FEB 9993 BOOK 88 776 -1 B. Proclamation Designating February 1993 as Florida Grapefruit Month Chairman Bird read aloud the following Proclamation: P R O C L A M A T I O N WHEREAS,, Florida's citrus industry contributes $8 billion annually to the state's coffers in direct and indirect economic activity= and WHEREAS, Florida is the first area in the world to make grapefruit a significant commercial crop and produced more that 50 percent of the world's grapefruit; and WHEREAS, Florida supplies nearly all of the fresh grapefruit and grapefruit juice consumed in the United States; and WHEREAS, Florida grapefruit supplies 100 percent of the U.S. RDA for Vitamin C and is also a good source of Vitamin A, potassium, folate and dietary fiber; and WHEREAS, more tha h 4.6 billion pounds of Florida grapefruit will be harvested during the 1992-93 season based on a forecast.,.,of 54 million boxes of grapefruit; and WHEREAS, citrus is a thriving industry here and contributes -to this.county's overall economic well-being; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT PROCLAIMED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA that the month of Februarybe designated as FLORIDA GRAPEFRUIT MONTH in Indian River County. ,. Approved.and adopted on February 9, 1993. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA BY RICHARD N. BIRD CHAIRMAN 4 C. Resolution Supporting Preservation 2000 Funding The Board reviewed memo from Environmental Planning Chief Roland DeBlois dated February 1, 1993: TO: James E. Chandler County Administrator DEPARTMENT HEAD CONCURRENCE: Obert M. Xeati9rg, AIP17- Community Devel pmen irector FROM: Roland DeBlois��CP Chief, Environmental Planning DATE: February 1, 1993 RE: Resolution Supporting Preservation 2000 Funding It is requested that the data herein presented be given formal consideration by the Board of County Commissioners at their regular meeting of February 9, 1993. DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS Preservation 2000 (P2000) was enacted by the State in 1990 as a ten year, $3 billion environmental lands acquisition program. For the first three years of the program, funding has been subject to re - appropriation on a yearly basis due to the lack of a permanent funding source. So far, funding for P2000 has come from documentary stamp revenues. Without a permanent funding source, the continuance of the P2000 program is in question each fiscal year. The Nature Conservancy (TNC) is a leading proponent of the P2000 program. On January 21, 1993, Debbie Keller of TNC contacted staff requesting that the Board of County Commissioners adopt a resolution supporting fourth year appropriation of funding for P2000. TNC is also urging local governments to support the appropriation of a permanent funding source for the remaining seven years of the program. At their regular meeting on January 27, 1993, the County Land Acquisition Advisory Committee (LAAC) voted to recommend that the Board adopt a resolution urging State appropriation of fourth year funding for P2000, as well as supporting the study of a permanent funding source for the program. ALTERNATIVES & ANALYSIS The P2000 program is the single most important opportunity for the County to obtain matching funds in implementing the recently approved $26 million environmental lands acquisition bond referendum. 5 n FEB 9 1993 BOOK 88 F�k,-i i BOOK 88 PAGE 778 -7 P2000 funds are the primary monies of the Conservation and Recreation Lands (CARL) program, the Florida Communities Trust (FCT) program, and the St. Johns River Water Management District (SJRWMD) land acquisition program, among others. P2000 funds will potentially be used in the acquisition of virtually all of the county LAAC sites presently under consideration. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that,the Board of County Commissioners adopt the attached resolution in support of fourth year appropriation of funding for P2000, and in support of the State pursuing a permanent funding source for the remaining seven years of the program. ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by Commissioner Adams, the Board unanimously adopted Resolution 93-27, urging the continued appropriation of funding for Preservation 2000, as recommended by staff. Resolution No. 93-27 A RESOLUTION OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY,,FLORIDA URGING THE CONTINUED APPROPRIATION OF FUNDING FOR PRESERVATION 2000. WHEREAS, the citizens of Indian River County have advanced environmental land preservation effortswith voter approval to locally fund a county wide preservation program; and WHEREAS, Preservation 2000 is a ten-year program designed to acquire and therefore save Florida's best remaining natural land, and is the State's most comprehensive land protection program; and WHEREAS, Florida's rate of population growth and conversion of natural areas continue to threaten our natural systems; and WHEREAS, Preservation 2000 offers an opportunity for funding partnership between Indian River County and the State to protect environmentally significant lands and support the implementation of our county comprehensive plan; and WHEREAS, Indian River County recognizes the importance of Preservation 2000 in enabling the implementation of conservation goals, growth management and comprehensive land use plans; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA: Section 1. That the Indian River County Board of County commissioners hereby urges the Legislature of the State of Florida to : A. Appropriate funding for Preservation 2000 for the upcoming year. B. Pursue a permanent funding source for the remaining seven years of the Preservation 2000 program. 6 im Section 2. This Resolution shall become effective immediately upon adoption. THE RESOLUTION was moved for adoption by Commissioner Fggert , the motion was seconded by Commissioner Adams , and upon being put to a vote, the vote was as follows: Commissioner Richard N. Bird Aye Commissioner John W. Tippin Aye Commissioner Carolyn K. Eggert Aye _ Commissioner Kenneth R. -Macht dye Commissioner Fran B. Adams —Aye The Chairman declared the resolution duly passed and adopted this 9 day of February , 1993. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA By -- �� 'Richard N. Bird Chairman D. Release of County Assessment Liens The Board reviewed memo from Legal Assistant Nancy Mossali dated January 27, 1993: TO: The Board of County Commissioners FROM: Nancy H. Mossali - County Attorney's Office DATE: January 27, 1993 SUBJECT: RELEASE OF COUNTY ASSESSMENT LIENS A routine form of Release has been prepared for Assessment Project No. 8709 (paving and drainage improvements to 42nd Avenue from 10th Street to 12th Street in Malaluka Gardens Subdivision) to release. paid assessment liens* from the below listed properties: ° Lot 10, Block A, Malaluka Gardens Subdivision iv J of -.Lot 12 and all of Lot 13, Block A, MaWuj&a wardens Subdivision ° Lot 16 and S J of Lot 17, Block A, Malaluka Gardens Subdivision ° N J of Lot 17 and all of Lot 18, Block A, Malaluka Gardens Subdivision ° Lots 1 and 2, Block B, Malaluka Gardens Subdivision WA In BOOK 88 F -AAE 779 L.._FEB 91993 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 BOOK 88 P, {E; 1. Lot 3, Block B, Malaluka Gardens Subdivision Lots 6 and 7, Block B, Malaluka Gardens Subdivision Lot 6, Block L, Malaluka Gardens Subdivision Lots 9 and It', � � i! alalu' 1--`)n:,7 Sa ,, bdivision Lot 11, Block M, Malaluka Gardens Subdivision Lot 14 and S 30' of Lot 15, Block M, Malaluka Gardens Subdivision Lot 20, Block M, Malaluka Gardens Subdivision It is requested that the Board authorize the Chairman to execute said Release. * Properties herein being released from Project No. 8709 are fully described in the assessment roll attached to Resolution No. 90-162 recorded at O.R. Book 943, Page 1480, Public Records of Indian River County, Florida. ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by Commissioner Adams, the Board unanimously approved the routine form of release of assessment liens as listed in staff's memorandum. RELEASE OF LIENS IS RECORDED IN THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF INDIAN RIVER CO. - ORIGINAL IS ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD E. Release of Utility Liens The Board reviewed memo from Lea R. Keller, CLA, dated January 29, 1993: TO: Board of yC)ounty Commissioners *AL)e - r'S its FROM: Lea R. Keller, CLA, County Attorney's Office DATE: January 29, 1993 RE: CONSENT AGENDA - BCC MEETING 2/9/93 RELEASE OF UTILITY LIENS The following lien -related documents are prepared in proper form for the Board to authorize the Chairman to sign them: 1. Release of Special Assessment Lien from Breezewood Water Project in the names of: PHILLIPS 2. Release of Special Assessment Lien from Courtside Water Project in the names of: FREDERICK 8 3. Release of Special Assessment Lien from Glendale Lakes Water Project in the names of: PARENT 4. Release of Special Assessment Lien from Seminole Shores Water Project in the names of: LAMBETH 5. :Release of Special Assessment Lien from SR 60 Sewer Project in the names of: Map 40 - HERON CAY - 20 CLYPSO CAY 6. Release of Special Assessment Lien from Kings Highway Water Project in the names of: COPPAGE STENGER (2) 7. Release of Special Assessment Lien from Phase I Water Project in the names of : BARNETT LOWTHER BERGER OVERTON BOTTOMLEY PANICO BROWN PITMAN BRUGEL TOMASEK CARTENSEN TROESE DUNN ' WHITTEN ENGLAND WISEMAN GOLLNICK WOHLFARTH GREENE WOLD GUADAGNO WOOD GUIDE ZANOTTI 7. Release of Special Assessment Lien from 9 River Shores Water Project in the names of: CORNWELL/YOUNGHOUSE HOLMES HOMMELL LYDSTON VELIE 8. Release of Special Assessment Lien from Summerplace Water Project in the names of: MATTHEWS MOLZ (2) 9. Release of Special Assessment Lien from 12 Street Water Project in the names of: BANNER MASTERS MURDOCK POWER WALTON WILLIS 10. Satisfaction/ Impact Fees: JONES LOWTHER ODOM ROBINSON WHYLLY 9 FEB 91993 to 88 Pmu 781 r FEB 9 1993 BOOK 88 FacF 78-2 -7 ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by Commissioner Adams, the Board unanimously approved the releases of liens and satisfactions of impact fees listed in staff's memorandum. SAID SATISFACTIONS AND RELEASES ARE RECORDED IN THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY F. Ordinance Amendincr Section 307.02 Concerning Parking Spaces for Certain Handicanned Persons Request for Public Hearing The Board reviewed memo from Assistant County Attorney Terry O'Brien dated February 2, 1993: TO: Board of County Commissioners Alh JWW FROM: Terrence P. O'Brien - Assistant County Attorne DATE: February 2, 1993 SUBJECT: PROPOSED ORDINANCE ENTITLED: AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA AMENDING SECTION 307.02 CONCERNING PARKING SPACES FOR CERTAIN HANDICAPPED PERSONS. A public hearing date of March 9, 1993 is suggested for the subject ordinance. Commissioner Eggert noted that this amendment is to correct the ordinance and is a good change. Chairman Bird agreed and added that the amendment would bring our ordinance in compliance with the City of Vero Beach ordinance. ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by Commissioner Adams, the Board unanimously scheduled a public hearing on March 9, 1993 to consider an ordinance amending Section 307.02 concerning parking spaces for certain handicapped persons. We G. Ordinance Amending Section 100. 05, IRC Code to Make the General Penalty Provisions Anulicable to Ordinances Prior to Codification The Board reviewed memo from Assistant County Attorney Terry O'Brien dated February 2, 1993: TO: Board of County Commissioners f� FROM: Terrence P. O'Brien - Assistant County Attorney4 `� DATE: February 2, 1993 SUBJECT: PROPOSED ORDINANCE ENTITLED: AN ORDINANCE OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA AMENDING SECTION 100.089 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY CODE TO MAKE THE GENERAL PENALTY PROVISIONS APPLICABLE TO ORDINANCES PRIOR TO CODIFICATION. A public hearing date of March 9, 1993 is suggested for the subject ordinance. ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by Commissioner Adams, the Board unanimously scheduled a public hearing March 9, 1993 to consider an ordinance amending Section 100.05 of the Code to make the general penalty provisions applicable to ordinances prior to codification. H. Subordination_ of County Lien - Impact Fee Extension Agreement The Board reviewed memo from Lea R. Keller, CLA, dated January 27, 1993: TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS gieA, JP -Y-4� FROM: Lea R. Keller, CLA, County Attorney's Office DATE: January 27, 1993 RE: SUBORDINATION OF COUNTY LIEN IMPACT FEE EXTENSION AGREEMENT The County has an outstanding impact fee extension agreement that created a lien on a certain piece of property which is owned by John L. Hickey. Mr. Hickey, the property owner, is refinancing his mortgage, and the mortgagee has requested the County consent to it being the first lien holder on the property. Since, in this case, the County lien Is not superior to the mortgage, this - request is agreeable to the Department of Utility Services. REQUESTED ACTION: Request the Board consent to the County Administrator's signing the attached Subordination on behalf of the County. 11 BOOK FE91993 r FEB BOOK 919�� ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by Commissioner Adams, the Board unanimously approved and authorized the County Administrator to execute the Subordination on behalf of the County, as recommended by staff. 88 FACE 784 SAID SUBORDINATION AGREEMENT IS RECORDED IN THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY I. Cancellation of Outstanding Taxes - Property Purchased for County Use The Board reviewed memo from Lea R. Keller, CLA, dated January 27, 1993: TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS 9/-A- R. FROM: Lea R. Keller, CLA, County Attorney's Office DATE: January 27, 1993 RE: CANCELLATION OF OUTSTANDING TAXES PROPERTY PURCHASED FOR COUNTY USE The County has recently acquired two parcels for right-of-way purposes on County Road #512, and pursuant to Section 196.28, Florida Statutes, the Board of County Commissioners is allowed to cancel and discharge any taxes owed on the portion of the property acquired for public purposes. Such cancellation must be done by resolution of the Board with a certified copy being forwarded to the Tax Collector. REQUESTED ACTION: Board authorize the Chairman to sign the attached resolutions cancelling taxes upon lands the County recently acquired. ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by Commissioner Adams, the Board unanimously adopted Resolution 93-28 and Resolution 93-29 cancelling certain delinquent taxes upon publicly -owned lands, as recommended by staff. 12 Re: R/W County Road #512 Sebastian Paradise Ltd. l�giL.l) ►..LSSU/ V k . 53 RESOLUTION NO. 93- 28 A RESOLUTION OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, CANCELLING CERTAIN DELINQUENT TAXES UPON PUBLICLY -OWNED LANDS, PUR- SUANT TO SECTION 196.281 FLORIDA STATUTES. WHEREAS, section 196.28, Florida Statutes, allows the Board of County Commissioners of each County to cancel and discharge any and all liens for taxes, delinquent or current, held or owned by the county or the state, upon lands heretofore or hereafter conveyed to or acquired by any agency, governmental subdivision, or municipality of the state,. or the United States, for road purposes, defense purposes, recreation, reforestation, or other public use; and WHEREAS, such cancellation must be by resolution of the Board of County Commissioners, duly adopted and entered upon its minutes properly describing such lands and setting forth the public use to which the same are or will be devoted; and WHEREAS, upon receipt of a certified copy of such resolution, proper officials of the county and of the state are authorized, empowered, and directed to make proper entries upon the records to accomplish such cancellation and to do all things necessary to carry out the provisions of section 196.28,'F.S.; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that any and all liens for taxes, delinquent or current, against the property described in O.R. Book 958, Page 2667, which was recently acquired by Indian River County for right of way purposes on C.R. #512, are hereby cancelled, pursuant to the authority of section 196.28, F.S. The resolution was moved for adoption by Commissioner Eggert , and the motion was seconded b Commissioner Adams y , and, upon being put to a vote, the vote was as follows: Chairman Richard N. Bird Aye Vice Chairman John W. Tippin Aye Commissioner Carolyn K. Eggert Aye Commissioner Fran B. Adams Aye Commissioner Kenneth R. Macht Aye The Chairman thereupon declared the resolution duly passed and adopted this 9 day of February , 1993. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA By`� .Richard N. Bird Chairman ' 13 �ooK 8 8 [.arE 7 5 FEB 91993 I FEB 91993 Re: R / W County. Road #512 Norpak Corporation BOOK 1/ 27/93 (legal) ttt:SSO / vlc. 54 RESOLUTION NO. 93-_2c_ A RESOLUTION OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, CANCELLING CERTAIN DELINQUENT TAXES UPON PUBLICLY -OWNED LANDS, PUR- SUANT TO SECTION 196.289 FLORIDA STATUTES. WHEREAS, -section 196.28, Florida Statutes, allows the Board of County Commissioners of each County to cancel and discharge any and all liens for taxes, delinquent or current, held or owned by the county or the state, upon lands heretofore or hereafter conveyed to or acquired by any agency, governmental subdivision, or municipality of the state, or the United States, for road purposes, defense purposes, recreation, reforestation, or other public use; and WHEREAS, such cancellation must be by resolution of the Board of County Commissioners, duly adopted and entered upon its minutes properly describing such lands and setting forth the public use to which the same are or will be devoted; and WHEREAS, upon receipt of a certified copy of such resolution, proper officials of the county and of the state are authorized, empowered, and directed to make proper entries upon the records to accomplish such cancellation -and to do all things necessary to carry out the provisions of section 196.28, F.S. ; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that any and all liens for taxes, delinquent or current, against the property described in O.R. Book 958, Page 0877, which was recently acquired by Indian River County for right of way purposes on C.R. #512, are hereby cancelled, pursuant to the authority of section 196.28, F.S. The resolution was moved for adoption by Commissioner Eggert , and the motion was seconded by Commissioner Adams , and, upon being. put to a vote, the vote was as follows: Chairman Richard N. Bird Aye Vice Chairman John W. Tippin Aye Commissioner Carolyn K. Eggert Aye Commissioner Fran B. Adams Aye Commissioner Kenneth R. Macht Aye The 'Chairman thereupon declared the resolution duly passed and adopted this 9 day of February 1993. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA By � Richard N. Bird Chairman 14 786 J. Amendment to FIND Grant Agreement for Environmental Learning Center The Board reviewed memo from Public Works Director Jim Davis dated February 2, 1993: TO: James E. Chandler, County Administrator FROM: James W. Davis, P.E. Public Works Director SUBJECT: Amendment to FIND Grant Agreement for Environmental Learning Center DATE: February 2, 1993 DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS FILE: elcamend.agn On January 25, 1991, Indian River County received a $175,000 Waterways Assistance Project Grant for construction of an environmental learning center consisting of classroom laboratories, auditorium, dock spaces, nature trails, canoe trails, boardwalks, environmental resource library and office space for various governmental agencies enabling educational programs to be taught. The agreement required the project be completed on/or before January 25, 1992, however, due to unforeseen delays, on January 2, 1992, staff requested and was granted an extension of time on February 6, 1992 with a new completion date of January 1, 1993. An additional $30,000 was requested and granted. These funds were received in October, 1992 for completion of the upland and wetland interpretive trail system. Since that time construction of the center has been completed (status report attached). An additional extension of time is now being requested for processing of invoices and completion of necessary inspections. The attached Amendment extends the project completion deadline to January 24, 1994. RECOMMENDATIONS AND FUNDING Staff recommends -that the Chairman be authorized to execute the attached Project Agreement Amendment. No funding is required. ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by Commissioner Adams, the Board unanimously approved the FIND Grant Project Agreement Amendment for the Environmental Learning Center, as recommended by staff. PARTIALLY EXECUTED AGREEMENT AMENDMENT IS ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF CLERK TO THE BOARD 15 FEB91993 Bm 8 8 F,,irF 787 BOOK O® F,�F 788 -7 K. Proposed Ordinance Chapter 202 Reclaimed Water Ordinance The Board reviewed memo from Utility Services Director Terry Pinto dated: DATE: JANUARY 25, 1993 TO: JAMES E. CHANDLER COUNTY ADMINISTRA FROM: TERRANCE G. PI DIRECTOR OF UTI TY SERVICES PREPARED ROBERT O. WISEMEN, P.E AND STAFFED ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEER BY: DEPARTMENT OF UTILITY SERVICES SUBJECT: RECLAIMED WATER ORDINANCE PROPOSED INDIAN RIVER COUNTY ORDINANCE, CHAPTER 202 BACKGROUND On August 29, 1991, the Department of Environmental Regulation issued a permit for construction of a reclaimed water pipe from Sea Oaks WWTF to the town of Orchid and Windsor Polo development. The reclaimed water pipe was necessitated by the proposed expansion of Sea Oaks WWTF for effluent disposal. The requirement of said permit is that the County establish procedures for user controls and construction practices in the development of a reclaimed water ordinance to regulate a possible cross connection to a potable water main, Rule 17-610, F.A.C. ANALYSIS The attached proposed ordinance addresses customer classifications, prohibited uses of reclaimed water, applications for connection to the reclaimed water system, system identification, cross -connection control practices, with minimum separation to other pipes, as required by Rule 17-610, F.A.C. RECOM 1ENDATION The Department of Utility Services recommends that the Board of County Commissioners consent to the department's advertising to hold a public hearing on Marc# 9, 1993. ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by Commissioner Adams, the Board unanimously scheduled a public hearing on March 9, 1993 to consider a Reclaimed Water ordinance, Chapter 202. L. Jim Granse Appointed to Land Acquisition Advisory Committee ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by Commissioner Adams, the Board unanimously appointed Jim Granse to the Land Acquisition Advisory Committee. 16 M. Appointments to Beach Restoration Advisory Committee ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by Commissioner Adams, the Board unanimously appointed Virginia H. Mann and Michael N. Vanatta to the Beach Restoration Advisory Committee. N. Appointment to the Planning and Zoning Commission ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by Commissioner Adams, the Board unanimously appointed Dorothy A. Hudson to the Planning and Zoning Commission. PUBLIC HEARING - PAVING AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS TO 91ST AVENUE BETWEEN 79TH STREET AND 87TH STREET - VERO LAKE ESTATES SUBDIVISION The hour of 9:05 o'clock A. M. having passed, the County Attorney announced that this public hearing has been properly advertised as follows: VERO BEACH PRESS -JOURNAL i I,- Published Daily o ,�� i,9, a Vero Beach, Indian River County, Flo a �S� COUNTY OF INDIAN RIVER: STATE OF FLORIDA ��l 0." Before the undersigned authority personally appeared J. J. Schuman l� r�! 6ma t 1 says that he is Business Manager of the Vero Beach Press -Journal, a daily newspape? �t'ifiT shed at Vero Beach in Indian River County, Florida; that the attached copy of advertisement, being IFIL• a In the matter In the , Court, was pub- /7 --lashed an said newspaper in the issues of Affiant further says that the said Vero Beach Press -Journal is a newspaper published at Vero Beach, in said Indian River County, Florida, and that the said newspaper has heretofore been continuously published in said Indian River County, Florida, each daily and has been entered as second class mail matter at the post office in Vero Beach, in said Indian River Coun- ty, Florida, for a period of one year next preceding the first publication of the attached copy of advertisement; and affiant further says that he has neither paid nor promised any person, firm or corporation any discount, rebate, commission or refund for the purpose of securing this advertisement for publication in the said newspaper. Sworn to and subscribe before me this � day f A.D. 19,�_ i '(Elusiness Manager) 17 LFEB 19 �ooK 789 - RESOLUTION NO. 93-2 A RESOLUTION OF 'THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF JNDIAN 'RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, PROVIDING • FOR CERTAIN PAVING , AND' DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS TO 91ST AVENUE FROM 79TH STREET TO 87TH -STREET',, , IN VERO LAKE ESTATES SUBDIVISION, PROVIDING THE TOTAL ESTIMATED COST, METHOD OF PAYMENT OF AS- SESSMENTS, NUMBER OF ANNUAL IN- STALLMENTS, AND LEGAL DESCRIP-; : TION OF THE, AREA SPECIFICALLY BENEFITED.WHEREASDepartment has been petitioned fothe r Roaty dh Paving and Drainage Irnprovernent for 91st Avenue from 79th Street to 877th Street In Vero Lake Estates Subdivision. WHEREAS, the construction of paving and dratn- auuttho�ed Chaptvements er saSSMI ifunding IS 208, Section 206.01 through 206.09, Indian River County Code; and lost esS. mates and pre&rdmary assessment rolls have been ' completedthe Public Works Departrnenh and the tototalestknatbbyy ed cost of the Eproposed HUNDRED paaving arid, drainage Improvts IsNINETY NINE 'THOUSANDDSSEVEN HUNDRED SIXTY FOUR DOLLARS and THIRTY-SIX CENTS (199,764,36): and I WHEREAS, the- special assessment provided her- eunder shag, for any givenn record owner of property within the area specially benefited, be assessed to the owner at the rate of $2.00 per front foot. The amount to be assessed under the Special Assess- ment Is $19,138.50 which Is approximately 9.56% +- of the total estimated cost of the project, and the balance of $180,625.86 shag cane from other reve- nue sources; and WHEREAS, the special assessment shag becone d;aa and payable at the Office of the Ta* Collector o` Indian River Coun ninety (90) days after the final determination of the spial assessment pursu- MA to Sectim 206.08, Indian River County Code; WHEREAS, any special assessment not paid within said ninety (90) day period. shag bear interest ' the BBooard oond f ftne due County ate miss rate swat the the of preparation.of the final assessment roll, and shag be payable in two (2) equal insta0ments, the first to be made twelve(12) months iron the dna date and subsequent payments to be due yearly; and -7 BOOK 88 pvF 700 WHEREAS,' after examination of the nature and anticipated usage of the Improvements, . the Board of �skm_ 9 has deter- mined that the following described properties shag receive a &act and special benefit from these im- provements, to wit: Lots 5 & 6, Block 1; Ldts 5 & 6, Block 2; Lots 5 & 6, Block 3; Lots 5 & 6, Block • 4; Lots t & 12, Block 5; Lots 1 & 12, Block 6; Lots 1 & 12, Block 7; Lots 1 & 12, Block 8 Vero Lake Estates, Unit 1, Plat Book 4, P�aggee 4Coun1• toyf the Public Records of Indian, Lots 9 - 16, Block 11; Lots 1 - 8, Block 12 Vero Lake Estates, Unit 2, Plat Book 4,, Rives C5o2mtovf • the Public Records of Indian Lots 9 - 16, Block 15; Lots 1 - 8, Block 16 • ., Vero Lake Estates, Unit 3, Plat Book 4, :. Page C559untoyf the Public Records of Indian RimLots 9 - 16, Block 19; Lots 1 - 8, Block 20 Vero Lake Estates, Unit 4, Plat Book 4, PPaggeeC8o88 orf the Public Records of. Indian .'. NOW THEREFORE, BE iT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, OF IN DIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, as follows: • 1. The foregoing recitals are affirmed and ratified I. their entirety. 2. A project provdlnq for paving and drainage In- provemen to 91st Avenkre from 79th Street to 87th Street in Vero Lake Estates Subdivision; here- tofore designated as Public Works Project No. 9211 .19. hereby approved subject egtuotrethe terms outlined above and all a 206, et seq. Indian t�County Code�th Chapter foregoingThe resolutm kwas offered b anomer Fy CaroNs- ggert who moved Its adoption. The motionwas seconded by Commissioner Adams and, upon . being put Commis ion erCarol n K. Eggwas erats follows- Commissioner ollows A Commissioner Richard N. BId r 'Aye Commissioner Fran B. Adams Aye Commissioner Kenneth R. Malo Aye + Commissioner John W. Tippn - Ave The Chairman thereupon declared the resokidan passed and adopted this 5 day of January, 1993. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ' INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA By -s -Richard N. Bird Attest: Chairman -W.K. Barton By:-s-Patrida Bargo Held, D.C. •r , Jan. 26.1993 968971', Civil Engineer Michelle Gentile commented. from the following: 18 TO: James Chandler County Administrator THROUGH: James W. Davis, P.E. Public Works Director and Roger D. Cain, P.E. i -- County Engineer FROM: Michelle A. Gentile, C.E. . Civil Engineer SUBJECT: Public Hearing for the Paving & Drainage Improvements to 91st Avenue between 79th Street and 87th Street in Vero Lake Estates Subdivision DATE: January 20, 1993 DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS On January 5, 1993 the Board of County Commissioners adopted Resolution No. 93-2 providing for certain paving and drainage improvements to 91st Avenue between 79th Street and 87th Street in Vero Lake Estates Subdivision. This project is a Public Works Department initiated public improvement assessment in cooperation with the Vero Lake Estates Property Owners Association Road.& Drainage Committee. On January 5, 1993 the Board of County Commissioners adopted another Resolution 93-3 setting the date and time for a Public Hearing to discuss the advisability, cost and amount of the assessment against each property owner. This hearing is scheduled for February 9, 1993. RECOMMENDATION AND FUNDING The project cost is estimated to be $199,764.36. The following Revenues are recommended: Vero Lake Estates MSTU as approved in 1991 $180,625.86 (90.4±%) Special Assessment ---19.138.50 ( 9.6±%) TOTAL $199,764.36 Staff recommends the Board of County Commissioners approve the assessment roll and confirming resolution with changes, if any, made after input at the February 9, 1993 Public Hearing. Revised confirming resolution and assessment roll will be forwarded to Chairman of the Board for signature. The Assessment Roll and assessment plat are on file with the Clerk to the Board of County Commissioner's office. 19 EB 9 103 BOOK 88 F•��F. 1 ��, H BOOK F,k -F 7.9 The Chairman opened the public hearing and asked if anyone wished to be heard in this matter. There being none, he closed the public hearing. ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by Commissioner Adams, the Board unanimously adopted Resolution 93-30 confirming the assessment roll for certain paving and drainage improvements to 91st Avenue between 79th Street and 87th Street in Vero Lake Estates Subdivision, as recommended by staff. RESOLUTION 93-30, WITH ASSESSMENT ROLL ATTACHED, IS RECORDED IN THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY Confirming (Third Reso.) 11/30/92(ENG)RES3.MAG\gfk RESOLUTION NO. 93-3Q_ A RESOLUTION OF BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, CONFIRMING _THE ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR CERTAIN PAVING AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS TO 91ST AVENUE BETWEEN 79TH STREET AND 87TH STREET. IN VERO'LAKE ESTATES SUBDIVISION. WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County adopted by Resolution No. 93-2, providing for certain paving and drainage improvements to 91st Avenue between 79th Street and B 7th Street in Vero Lake Estates Subdivision; and -WHEREAS, said resolution described the manner in which said special assessments shall be made and how said special assessments are to be paid; and WHEREAS, the resolution was published as required by Section 206.06, Indian River County Code; and. WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of' -Indian River County.passed Resolution No. 93-3, on January 5, 1993, which set a time and place for a public hearing at which the owners of the properties to be assessed and other interested persons would have the chance to be heard as to any and all complaints as to said project and said special assessments, and for the Board to act as required by Section 206.07, Indian River County Code; and all Y WHEREAS, notice of the time and place of the public hearing was published in the Vero Beach Press Journal Newspaper on January 26, 1993, and February 2, 1993, (twice one week apart, and the last being at least one week prior to the hearing), as required by Section 206.06, Indian River County Code; and WHEREAS, the land owners of record were mailed notices at least•ten days prior to the hearing, as required by Section 206.06,'Indian River County Code; and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County on Tuesday. February 9. 1993 at 9:05 A.M. conducted the public hearing with regard to the special assessments, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, as follows: 1. The foregoing recitals are affirmed and ratified in their entirety. 2. The special assessments shown on the attached assessment roll are hereby confirmed and approved, and shall remain legal, valid, and binding first liens against the properties assessed until paid in full. 3. The County will record the special assessments and this resolution, which describes the properties assessed and the amounts of the special assessments, on the public .records, which shall constitute prima facie evidence of the validity of the special assessments. The resolution was moved for adoption by' Commissioner Eggert , and the motion was seconded by Commissioner Adams ; and, upon being put to a vote, the vote was as follows: ' Chairman Richard N. Bird Aye Vice Chairman John W. Tippin Aye Commissioner Fran B. Adams Aye Commissioner Kenneth R. Macht Aye Commissioner Carolyn K. Eggert Aye The Chairman thereupon declared the resolution duly passed and adopted this 9 day of February , 1993. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA By RICHARD N. BIRD, Chairman 21 0 FEB 91993 80OK 88 Face 793 FEB 9 1993 BOOK 88 PnF. 794 -7 PUBLIC HEARING — INDIAN RIVER COUNTY'S REQUEST FOR SPECIAL EXCEPTION USE APPROVAL TO CONSTRUCT AN ELEVATED WATER STORAGE FACILITY The hour of 9:05 o'clock A. M. having passed, the County Attorney announced that this public hearing has been properly advertised as follows: VERO BEACH PRESS -JOURNAL Published Daily Vero Beach, Indian River County. Florida COUNTY OF INDIAN RIVER: STATE OF FLORIDA Before the undersigned authority personally appeared J. J. Schumann, Jr. who on oath says that he is Business Manager of the Vero Beach Press -Journal, a daily newspaper published at Vero Beach in Indian River County, Florida; that the attached copy of advertisement, being a � l�G' NOTICEHEAR �G I In the matter of—yz/& oftoFPUBIJC Notice`of of spe• consider the for an ciat exception stor- age t The �W PoPtY is presentlyowned Indian 21. by Flerniq OraRnL SSo � abovedn apellocattion.on A public hearing at which parties in interest and dozens shag have an oppornadty to be heard, w9 in the Court, was pub- , Of be heldp� ��, Viain Indian Build-. ` sion Chambers of the County Admirdstratton Ing boated at 1940 25th street, Vero 68801%Fbr-' lished in said newspaper in the issues of is on Tuesday, February 9,1993 at 9:05 am. '— Anyone who may wish to appeal arty derision to why may be made at this mee wip need en sure that a verbatim record of the proceedings Is. made. which includes testlmony .and evidence upon Affiant further says that the said Vero Beach Press -Journal is a newspaper published at w1> the aOppN�Es� IS based. COMMODATION FOR THISE EETINO I Vero Beach, in said Indian River County, Florida, and that the said newspaper has heretofore MUST CONTACT THE COUNTY'S AMER- been continuously published in said Indian River County, Florida, each daily and has been ICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT iADA) I4488THOURS entered as second class mail matter at the post office in Vero Beach, in said Indian River Coun- LEASTCOO INSADVANt CxOF THE ty, Florida, for a period of one year next preceding the first publication of the attached copy of MEETING." INDIAN RIVER COUNTY advertisement; and affiant further says that he has neither aid nor promised an y P P Y Person, firm Board of CountyCmmrs' or corporation any discount, rebate, commission or refund for he purpose of securing this for publication in the said newspaper. By-s-RichardN. Bird,Chaimm "12advertisement JWL20,1993 Sworn to and subscribed before rri ^ day of D. 19 (Business Manager) The Board reviewed memo from Current Development Staff Planner John McCoy dated January 27, 1993: 22 TO: James E. Chandler County Administrator DIVISION HEAD CONCURRENCE: Robert M. Reatincj, AIgq Community Development irector THROUGH: Stan Boling, AICP Planning Director FROM: John W. McCoy /�* Senior Planner Current Development DATE: January 27, 1993 SUBJECT: Indian River County's Request for Special Exception Use Approval to Construct An Elevated Water Storage Facility It is requested that the data herein presented be given formal consideration by the Board of County Commissioners at its regular meeting of February 9, 1993. DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS: The H.F. Lenz Company has submitted an application on behalf of the Indian River County Department Of. -Utility Services for minor site plan and special exception use approval to construct a 130' elevated water storage tank. The proposed tank will be located in Roseland behind the existing Riverwalk Shopping Center, at 14001 U.S. Highway #1. The subject property is zoned RM -6, which requires special exception use approval for a water tower (limited utility use). Pursuant to Section 971.05 of the LDRs, the Board of County Commissioners is to consider the appropriateness of the requested use based on the submitted site plan and the suitability of the site for that use. The Board may approve, approve with conditions or deny the special exception use and may attach any conditions and safeguards necessary to mitigate impacts and to ensure compatibility of the use with the surrounding area. The Technical Review Committee (TRC) has approved the applicant's request for minor site plan approval. At its January 14, 1993 meeting, the Planning and Zoning Commission voted unanimously to recommend that the Board of County Commissioners approve the special exception use. If the Board of County Commissioners approves the special exception use request, then the minor site plan approval will become effective. ANALYSIS: 1. Size of Development Area: 43,559 sq. ft. or 1 acre 2. 3. Zoning Classification: RM -6, Residential Multi -Family (up to 6 units per acre) Land Use Designation: L-2, Low Density 2 (up to 6 units per acre) 23 FE 9 �9� WK�� F'•6E 795 r aooK FEB 100 88 Pa ;- -1�7 6 4. Tower Pedestal Area: 1,590 sq. ft. 5. Total Impervious Area: 1,741 sq. ft. (pedestal and stabilized parking/driveway area) 6. Open Space: Required: 40% Provided: 77% 7. Traffic Circulation: The project will be 'accessed through the rear of the existing Riverwalk Shopping Center over an existing access easement. The project will utilize a 22' two- way driveway to access the site. S. Off -Street Parking: Required: 1 space Provided: 1 space It is anticipated that 1 vehicle per week will visit the site. The one parking space will be provided on the proposed stabilized, unpaved driveway. At its January 14, 1993 meeting, the Planning and Zoning Commission determined that the project is an infrequent use and approved the use of unpaved, stabilized parking and driving areas pursuant to Land Development Regulations Section 954.08(4). 9. Stormwater Management: The stormwater management plan meets all minor site plan drainage criteria and has been approved by the Public Works Department. 10. Landscape Plan: The landscape plan is in conformance with Chapter 926, including Type "A" buffers on the north and west sides of the subject development. All buffer and landscaping requirements will be satisfied through the preservation of existing vegetation. 11. Utilities: The facility will be unmanned; therefore, no sanitary facilities will be required. 12. Dedications and Improvements: None are required. 13. Concurrency: No concurrency certificate is required for this project, since no intensification of the site is proposed that would substantially impact traffic, drainage, parks, solid waste or utilities demand. 14. FAA Requirements: The applicant has filed notice with the FAA for the construction of the tower. As of the writing of this report, the FAA is currently reviewing the proposal to make a determination on any lighting requirements. Prior to site plan release (and thus, project construction), the applicant will need to submit documentation to planning staff from the FAA regarding the lighting requirements. Staff will ensure that FAA requirements are satisfied. 15. Specific Land Use Criteria: A. Between all above -ground facilities (except distribution and collection facilities) and adjacent property having a residential land use designation, a Type "B" buffer (reduce to Type "C" where abutting a local roadway, reduce to "D" buffer where abutting a thoroughfare plan roadway) (with six-foot opaque screening) as specified in Chapter 926, Landscaping, shall be provided; 24 B. All below -ground high voltage cables within a utility right-of-way shall be make known to the public through the use of signs posted therein; C. In all zoning districts except the industrial districts, all equipment, machinery and facilities which cannot by their size or nature be located within an enclosed building shall be separated from adjacent properties having a residential land use designation by a Type "D" buffer (with six-foot opaque screening) as specified in Chapter 926, Landscaping; D. Driveways located in close proximity to adjacent properties having a residential land use designation shall provide a six-foot opaque screening between the driveway and adjacent property. An eight -foot opaque screen may be required if deemed necessary to mitigate noise and visual impacts. Staff has verified that this application meets all applicable specific land use criteria. 16. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: North: Vacant/RM-6 South: Riverwalk Shopping Center Expansion/CG East: Riverwalk Shopping Center/CG West: Vacant/RM-6 RECOMMENDATION: Based on the analysis performed, staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners approve the special exception use request. ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by Commissioner Adams, the Board unanimously approved the special exception use for an elevated water storage facility, as set out in staff's memorandum. PROPERTY EXCHANGE WITH TOWN OF INDIAN RIVER SHORES County Administrator Jim Chandler made the following presentation: 25 FEB 91993 BOOK F,,�lu ?-97 BOOK 88 798 TO: Board of County Commissioners DATE: January 29, 1993 FILE: SUBJECT: Property Exchange with Town of Indian River Shores G�'-�' f FRO James E. Chandler REFERENCES: County Administrator In the fall of 1991, the County and the Town of Indian River Shores began negotiations for the sale and/or trade of the County property adjacent to Tracking Station Park for Gifford Park. At the January 21, 1992 meeting, the Board approved exchange of the properties in question with conditions. The Town Council also approved the proposal at its January 23, 1992 meeting. At a public hearing on March 10, 1992, the Board approved the transaction by adopting Resolution 92-46. In July, 1992, the Town expressed objection to payment of the cash differential if the abutting Tracking Station property were to be limited to public use. The Board at its July 14, 1992 meeting considered the matter and clarified the conditions. Chairman Eggert transmitted these conditions to the Town by letter dated July 16, 1992. The specific conditions for the trade of the properties are: 1) the property shall be restricted to public use, 2) the County shall retain the right of first refusal on a sale to another public entity, and 3) Indian Raver Shores pay the County $125,000. The Town Manager, by letter dated January 19, 1993, has requested that the Board reconsider our position. There is no change in the Town position from that considered by the Board at the July 14, 1992 meeting. Unless the Board believes there is merit in modifying the conditions, I would recommend that the matter not be pursued any further. Chairman. Bird pointed out that the Parks and Recreation Committee considered this item several months ago. The feeling at that time was that we would like to have both pieces of property. However, there probably is a more pressing need for expansion of the Gifford Park project because there is oceanfront property for recreational use north of Wabasso as well as parks within the City of Vero Beach which are near the Tracking Station Park. Chairman Bird asked whether the Town of Indian Shores planned to create a park with beach access for the residents of the Town of Indian River Shores. He felt that this is an attractive piece of property which could be developed into a passive park with a few picnic tables and minimum parking.- The County owns the property east of the property in question and would cooperate and allow a :dune crossover to the beach. 26 Bob Schoen, vice mayor of Indian River Shores, stated that Indian River Shores Town Council did consider use of the property for recreation because there is a need for beach access in that area. However, they are interested in that property because they have the larger problem of stormwater runoff going down the storm sewers and directly into the lagoon. Indian River Shores is required by their comprehensive plan to eliminate that runoff situation by establishing retention ponds. Their plan includes a retention pond with a walkway around it for access to the beach. The Indian River Shores Town Council disagrees with the cash differential because it was their understanding that the $125,000. -.represented a difference in fair market value of the two properties at their highest and best use. The oceanfront property is no longer available for its highest and best with a restriction for public use on it. Mr. Schoen hoped the Commission would reconsider the matter and either agree to the land swap plus $125,000 with no restrictions, or if the Commission feels strongly that the restriction is necessary, then drop the $125,000 cash differential because the beachfront property is no longer available for its highest and best use. County Administrator Jim Chandler explained that both appraisals were done at the highest and best use. The appraised value on the property adjacent to Tracking Station Park was $700,000 and on the Gifford Park property it was $575,000. The highest and best use in both cases would be residential. Chairman Bird felt that since both properties were appraised at the highest and best use, and both would have the restriction of public use, the difference in value of $125,000 is a fair deal. Mr. Schoen thought that the distinction between the two properties is that the Gifford Park property already is dedicated to public use, whereas the beachfront property is residential. He thought the Indian River Shores Town Council would prefer to have a reappraisal if that is the Commission's proposal. Commissioner Eggert thought we should have appraisals on both properties based on public use. Commissioner Adams felt that it might cost $125,000 if Indian River Shores took the property and constructed the retention pond and walkaround. Conversely,, the cost might be the, same if the County built a passive park there. For that reason she felt that it should be handled as an even swap with no cash involved. In that way the County would be contributing'to the environment also. Administrator Chandler pointed out that we have use of Gifford Park to the year 2000. If we retained possession of the beachfront property to that time, we could sell it and purchase the Gifford 27 L_ FEB 91993 BOOK 88 F k,u 799 r FEB 91993 BOOK 08 M) 8100 Park property and still have dollars left over. He further thought that with the exchange of land and the exchange of dollars the County would have clear title to the Gifford Park property, the Town of Indian River Shores would have a piece of property for public use, and the public would benefit in all respects. Chairman Bird stated that since this item was first addressed he has viewed it from all aspects and concluded that both properties were appraised at the highest and best use and there is $125,000 difference in value. There have been recent sales and the new comparables could determine that the property value might be higher now. He felt the deal was fair because both properties would have a restriction for public use. Commissioner Eggert clarified, and Mr. Schoen confirmed that the Indian River Shores Town Council suggested two alternatives: a straight land swap with the restriction for public use on the beachfront property, or the land swap without the restriction but with the additional sum of $125,000 paid by the Town of Indian River Shores to the County. Mr. Schoen felt sure that the difference in value would change if an appraisal were done on the present use of Gifford Park and the inherent use of the beachfront property. Chairman Bird felt so strongly that the difference in value does exist that he could be talked into making the trade with the cash payment and without the restrictions. Mr. Schoen stated that the Town of Indian River Shores would be delighted with that deal. Commissioner Macht wondered if a modified restriction would be more agreeable to the Town of Indian River Shores, but Mr. Schoen stressed that the money is the bothersome item. Chairman Bird reminded everyone that there was a third string attached which is the right of first refusal on both properties, and Mr. Schoen stated that the right of first refusal was acceptable to him. Commissioner Eggert pointed out that the County would be in a difficult situation if we traded the beachfront property now and the Town of Indian River Shores put it up for sale and we were asked to repurchase it at half a million or a million dollars. Chairman Bird was willing to drop the public use provision and keep the cash differential. Commissioner Eggert asked whether that was Mr. Schoen's preference, and Mr. Schoen thought they could live with it either way. He just wanted to come to a conclusion on this item. Commissioner Macht suggested a motion to swap the two pieces of property, the Town of Indian River Shores pay to the County the 28 ® M _ sum of $125,000, and each would have the right of first refusal in the sale of either property. County Attorney Charles Vitunac reminded the Commissioners that we must have a public hearing. ON MOTION by Commissioner Macht, SECONDED by Commissioner Eggert, the Board unanimously set a public hearing on March 16, 1993 at 9:05 a.m. to consider the property exchange with the Town of Indian River Shores. APPROVAL OF HEARING DATES FOR TWO EVENING BOARD HEARINGS TO CONSIDER LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS AMENDMENTS Community Development Director Bob Keating commented from the following: TO: James E. Chandler County Administrator DIV ON HEAD CONCURRENCE: Rb-bertM. Keating, AI Community Development irector FROM: Stan Boling�ICP Planning Director DATE: January 28, 1993 SUBJECT: Approval of Hearing Dates for Two Evening Board Hearings to Consider LDR Amendments It is requested that the data herein presented be given formal consideration by the Board of County Commissioners at its regular meeting of February 9, 1993. BACKGROUND: Since October 1, 1990, the Florida Statutes has required two evening meetings of the Board of County Commissioners whenever amendments to the Land Development Regulations (LDRs) are to be considered and adopted. To minimize the number of required evening meetings, staff has limited the number of times the LDR's are amended. This has been done by holding proposed LDR amendments until a sufficient number of amendments exist. 29 FEB 91993 BOOK 8 F-ncr 801 FEB 9 1993 BOOK 88 P,t,E $02 At this time, there are several proposed LDR amendments which now require consideration and action by the Board of County Commissioners. These LDR changes have been initiated by applicants, county staff, the Professional Services Advisory Committee (PSAC), and the Affordable Housing Advisory Committee (AHAC). In addition, this set of LMR amendments includes the proposed "Airport Zoning Ordinance" which is mandated by state law. Both the PSAC and the Planning and Zoning Commission have now considered and made recommendations to the Board regarding all or a portion of the proposed LDR amendments. To proceed with the review and approval process for the amendments, the Board must now set dates and times for the required two evening public hearings. ANALYSIS AND ALTERNATIVES: Most of the proposed amendments were considered by the Planning and Zoning Commission at its January 14, 1993 meeting. The Commission also considered the proposed Airport Zoning Ordinance at its January 21, 1993 workshop and is scheduled to consider the ordinance again at its February 11, 1993 regular meeting. The Board of County Commissioners must now hold its meetings. State requirements mandate seven day notice (newspaper advertisement) prior to the first meeting, five day notice prior to the second meeting, and at least two weeks between 'tba__two meetings. The meetings must be held after 5:00 p.m. In addition to these normal LDR amendment advertising requirements, special advertising requirements apply. to the Airport Zoning Ordinance proposal. While most of the proposed amendments are non -controversial, some items will require significant discussion, most notably the Airport Zoning Ordinance. *)ne set of hearing dates which would comply with all the state equirements is: MEETING DATE TIME 1. Tuesday, March 2, 1993 5:01 p.m. 2. Thursday, March 18, 1993 5:01 p.m. Staff has tentatively reserved use of the Commission Chambers for these proposed dates. The Board may establish any other dates that meet state requirements and during which the Chambers may be used. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board establish meeting dates for the two evening public hearings required to consider and adopt the proposed LDR amendments. ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by Commissioner Macht, the Board unanimously scheduled public hearings on March 2, 1993 at 5:01 p.m. and on March 18, 19.93 at 5:01 p.m. to consider amendments to the Land Development Regulations, as recommended by staff. 30 NEW JUDICIAL COMPLEX PROPERTIES - ADDITIONAL PROPERTIES General Services Director Sonny --Dean made the following presentation: DATE: FEBRUARY 2, 1993 TO: HONORABLE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS THRU: JAMES E. CHANDLER COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR FROM: H.T. "SONNY" DEAN, DIRECTOR DEPARTMENT OF GENERAL SERVICE SUBJECT: NEW JUDICIAL COMPLEX PROPERTIES BACKGROUND: In 1991, the Board of County Commissioners approved a staff recommendation that included the construction of a new courthouse and parking garage which would meet space requirements for our judicial system until the year 2010. To facilitate the construction of this facility would require purchase of Block 45 and all but four lots in Block 44. These remaining four lots would be needed to construct a office building for the State Attorney and Public Defender in 2010. Last year, the Board instructed staff to pursue the purchase of these remaining four lots for future use, provided they could be obtained at a reasonable price. The original appraisals were updated and contact was made with the property owners. James W. and Mary Harsbarger, owners approached but their selling price appraisal. There has been no further ANALYSIS: of Lots 6 and 7, Block 44, were was almost twice that of the progress, to date. Mr. Sidney Banack, owner of Lots 8 and 9, Block 44, indicated he would be interested in selling his property to the County. After almost twelve months of negotiations, Mr. Banack has agreed to sell this property for total cost of $465,520. This price is made up of $350,000 for the.property, which is the appraised value, and $115,520 for relocating in comparable space, and moving of furnishings and equipment. RECOMMENDATIONS: Staff is recommending acquisition of the Banack properties at a purchase price of $465,520 and requests authorization to proceed with the formal closing. Funds will come from the one cent sales tax. County Administrator Jim Chandler further commented that the owner of Lots 6 and 7, Block 44 are adamant in their asking price and staff recommends that we not pursue purchase of those properties in the near future. 31 FEB9 1993BOOK 8� Jnr, &�3 FEBFr-- 9 1-493 BOOK 88 FAGF. 804 ON MOTION by Commissioner Macht, SECONDED by Commissioner Eggert, the Board unanimously approved the purchase of Lots 8 and 9, Block 44, at a total price of $465,520, and authorized staff to proceed with the formal closing, as recommended by staff. FIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH PROPERTY General Services Director Sonny Dean made the following presentation: DATE: FEBRUARY 2, 1993 TO: HONORABLE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS THRU: JAMES E. CHANDLER COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR FROM: H.T. "SONNY" DEAN, DIRECTO DEPARTMENT OF GENERAL SERVICES SUBJECT: FIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH PROPERTY BACKGROUND: The First United Methodist Church of Vero Beach has made an offer to sell their property located on Blocks 42, 43 and 44 in downtown Vero Beach. These properties lie immediately to the west of our new parking garage site, south and west of the Main Library. (See attached map). The Church suggested in their request that the subject.property could be used to locate a new County Administration Building with parking. ANALYSIS: In 1991, the County contracted with a consultant to do a in depth space needs study and master plan for all administrative offices other than those associated with the judicial system. It was recommended, by the Consultant, that a new administration building be constructed on properties north of the present administration complex which are partially owned by the County. This recommendation was based on land acquisition cost, zoning, and amount of property required. RECOMMENDATIONS: Based on the 1991 study, it is staff's opinion that we should use the master plan as accepted by the Board. In using the plan as a guideline, the properties owned by the United Methodist Church would not be of benefit to the County for building purposes. Therefore, staff recommends the subject property not be purchased at this time. 32 Director Dean noted the property should be identified as Blocks 42, 43 and 39 in downtown Vero Beach. Commissioner Macht thought there are advantages in locating an administration building on the church property and use the courthouse parking facility for both buildings. He also thought there should be discussion with other government entities and agencies, and the mechanism for doing that exists in the Land Acquisition Advisory Committee. Commissioner Eggert recalled that past discussions involved the possibility of the School Board moving into the present administration building. Then the property north of the present administration building would be used to meet the needs of the Public Health, Veterans and Welfare departments as well as the County Administration. Administrator Chandler confirmed that the conclusion of the space needs study was that if we ever construct a new building, we have sufficient property holdings north of the present Administration Building to construct that facility. Additionally, property values in the downtown area are higher. Chairman Bird felt the timing is not right because we are not even at a beginning point to make any decisions. Scott Chisholm, representing the Long -Range Planning Committee for the First United Methodist Church, explained that he is addressing the Commission because County facilities are being constructed in downtown Vero Beach. He stressed that First United Methodist Church has not voted yet on whether the property should be sold. They have not approached any other entities and are taking this first step to see if there is any interest on the part of the County to acquire this property before they place the property on the market. He further stated that he did not expect a commitment from the Commission at this time but wanted to see if there is any interest. Chairman Bird thought there is an interest but the County is not in a position to make a commitment, and he suggested that they market the property if they feel the need to. TCI CABLEVISION REQUEST FOR COUNTY ROAD 6 BRIDGE DIVISION ASSISTANCE IN PLANTING WASHINGTONIAN PALMS WITHIN BR60 MEDIAN Public Works Director Jim Davis made the following presentation: 33 FE BOOK ; 88 U,U S05 L! 9 �993 F E B BOOK p� FAGr`. C7111� TO: James E. Chandler, County Administrator FROM: James W. Davis, P.E., Public Works Director9 Va SUBJECT: T.C.I. Cablevision Request for County Road and Bridge Division Assistance in Planting Washingtonian Palms within SR60 Median REF. LETTER: James Foody, TCI Cablevision, to Jim Davis dated 1-14-93 DATE: January 29, 1993 FILE: tcicable.agn DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS Last year, TCI Cablevision donated approximately 140 Washingtonian Palms to the County for planting within the SR60 Median west of 43rd Avenue. Even though the DOT constructed median improvements shortly thereafter, the palms currently in place are healthy and some are temporarily in storage until..the work is over. This year, TCI Cablevision is requesting permission to purchase and plant 90-100 palms for the SR60 median west of 66th Avenue. The County is being requested to supply mulch, fertilizer, and water at a direct cost of approximately $200. In addition, County and TCI labor will be used to plant the palms in the State road right-of-way. The County would also maintain the plants as needed. The planting is proposed for March, 1993. ALTERNATIVES AND ANALYSIS In the past, the. County has not performed aggressive landscape maintenance of the entire SR60 median east of I-95. Washingtonian Palms are low maintenance, but some additional effort will be required to trim, mulch and maintain the area. The alternatives presented include the following: Alternative #1 Approve the request by TCI Cablevision for the County to supply labor, materials, and future maintenance for the placement of 90-100 palms in the SR60 median west of Kings Highway. Alternative #2 Deny the request. RECOMMENDATIONS AND FUNDING Alternative # 1 is recommended whereby the request is approved. Funding to be from Road and Bridge Division budgeted funds. Commissioner Adams led discussion on the types of trees to be planted, and Director Davis explained that the Washingtonian palms were approved by Department of Transportation. 34 ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED by Commissioner Eggert, the Board unanimously approved labor, materials and future maintenance for the placement of 90 to 100 palm trees in the SR60 median west of Kings Highway, as set out in staff's memorandum. FDOT LOCAL GOVERNMENT COOPERATIVE ASSISTANCE The Board reviewed memo from Capital Projects Manager Terry Thompson dated January 28, 1993: TO: James E. Chandler, County Administrator �i THROUM: James W. Davis, P.E. Public Works Director FROM: Terry B. Thompson, P.E. p Capital Projects Manager SUBJECT: FDOT Local Government Cooperative Assistance Program - 41st Street and 45th Street DATE: January 28, 1993 DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS The Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) is accepting Local Government Cooperative Assistance (LGCA) Program grant applications. Under the LGCA Program, the FDOT funds 50 percent of the projects estimated eligible cost. Staff is of the opinion that the County should apply for funding 41st Street and 45th Street from Indian River Boulevard to US 1. These two east/west connectors were not included in the scope of work for construction of Indian River Boulevard Phase IV from 37th Street to 53rd Street because the right-of-way has not been acquired. Phase IV construction has been advertised and the bid opening is scheduled for March 10, 1993. Attached is a grant application package and resolution requesting matching financial assistance under the LGCA Program. The actual level of funding available in the upcoming fiscal year (beginning July 1) is subject to Legislative appropriation. RE C IDATIOHS AMID FUNDING Staff recommends that the Chairman be authorized to execute the attached resolution authorizing the County Administrator and the Budget.. Director to enter into a LGCA Program memorandum of agreement. Funding is from Indian River Boulevard North. KR FEB91993 bOOK 88 P,k,F8.:x`7 r FEB 9 1993 BOOK 88 PAGE 80-8 -7 ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by Commissioner Tippin, the Board unanimously adopted Resolution 93-34, authorizing the County Administrator and the Budget Director to enter into a local government cooperative assistance program memorandum of agreement and joint participation agreement with the Department of Transportation, as recommended by staff. PARTIALLY EXECUTED COPY OF SAID AGREEMENT IS ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF CLERK TO THE BOARD EXHIBIT E FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION LOCAL GOVERNMENT COOPERATIVE ASSISTANCE PROGRAM Application Agency: Indian River County NO. A RESOLUTION OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, AUTHORIZING THE COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR AND THE BUDGET DIRECTOR TO ENTER INTO A LOCAL GOVERNMENT COOPERATIVE ASSISTANCE PROGRAM MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT AND JOINT PARTICIPATION AGREEMENT WITH THE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION. WHEREAS, the Legislature has created the Local Government Cooperative Assistance Program, Chapter 335.20, Florida Statutes; and, WHEREAS, it is a policy of the State of Florida to construct and make improvement to the State Transportation System in a cooperative partnership; and, WHEREAS, such partnership shall be promoted and encouraged through the joint funding of projects that improve traffic flow and reduce congestion on the State Highway System; and, WHEREAS, Indian River County desires to receive matching financial assistance for such projects; and, WHEREAS, Indian River County wishes to authorize the County Administrator and the Budget Director to make an application(s) for such projects, enter into a -Memorandum of Agreements(s) and, if the proposed projects are selected for funding, enter into a Joint Participation Agreement with the State of Florida Department of Transportation. NOW THEREFORE: BE IT RESOLVED, by Indian River County: Section 1. Indian River County hereby authorizes the County Administrator and the Budget Director to apply for matching funds under the Local Government Cooperative Assistance Program. 36 11, Section 2. Indian River County hereby authorizes the County Administrator and the Budget Director to enter into a Memorandum of Agreement with State of Florida Department of Transportation. Section 3. Indian River County hereby authorizes the County Administrator and Budget Director to enter into a Joint Participation Agreement with the State of Florida Department of Transportation, if 41st Street and 45th Street from Indian River Boulevard to US 1 is selected for funding. . Section 4. The Clerk of Indian River County is hereby directed to send copies of this RESOLUTION to the Department of Transportation and all other persons as directed by Indian River County. APPROVED AND ADOPTED by Indian River County at a regular meeting assembled this day of _�,L.., 19so. INDIAN RIVER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COIrMSSION Ric and N. Bird, Chairman PURCHASE AUTHORIZATION - 45TH STREET RIGHT-OF-WAY ACQUISITION VIRGINIA RUSSELL, TWO PARCELS The Board reviewed memo from County Right -of -Way Agent Don Finney dated January 28, 1993: TO: James E. Chandler, County Administrator THROUGH: James W. Davis, P.E. Public Works Director AND CP Terry B. Thompson, PX4f'� Capital Projects Manager FROM: Donald G. Finney, SRA County Right of Way Agent SUBJECT: Purchase Authorization; 45th Street Right -of -Way Acquisition, Virginia Russell, Two Parcels DATE: January 28, 1993 Indian River County is planning to widen and pave 45th Street east of U.S. Highway #1 to Indian River Boulevard, Phase 4. The additional right-of-way needed to accomplish this project consists of the acquisition of 10 parcels. A Contract For Sale and Purchase was sent to the property owner 37 CEB9 1993eooK�J Fp' -FEB 9199 BOOK 88 PnE 810 1 for two 0.48 acre parcels, totaling .96 acres. These properties are zoned commercial. The Russells have agreed to sell at the appraised value and have executed the Contract For Sale and Purchase for each of the parcels. There are no additional attorney's fees at this time. Additional compensation for citrus trees taken in the amount of $1,375.00 is in Addendum A for one of the parcels. Title insurance, recording and documentary stamps on the deeds will be a closing expense of $1,584.00. Staff request the Board authorize the $57,744.00 contract for each parcel, the $1,375 tree compensation, and $1,584 for closing costs; and direct the chairman to execute the contracts on the Board's behalf. Total cost is $118,447.00. EMM Funding is available in Account No. 309-215-541-066.12 ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED by Commissioner Eggert, the Board unanimously approved and authorized the Chairman to execute two contracts with Virginia Tarleton Russell and Hugh L. Russell II, et al., in the total amount of $118,447.00, as recommended by staff. EXECUTED COPIES OF CONTRACTS FOR SALE AND PURCHASE ARE ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF CLERK TO THE BOARD BACKUP FOR EFFLUENT DISPOSAL SYSTEM WEST REGIONAL WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT TO DEEP WELL RECLAIMED WATER PIPELINE (TASK ORDER NO. 2) Utility Services Director Terry Pinto made the following presentation: DATE: JANUARY 27, 1993 TO: JAMES E. CHANDLER COUNTY ADMINISTRA FROM: TERRANCE G. PI O DIRECTOR OF SERVICES V RwPREPARED ROBERT O. WISEMEN, P. AND STAFFED ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINE BY: DEPARTMENT OF UTILITY SERVICES SUBJECT: BACK -IIP FOR EFFLIIENT DISPOSAL SYSTEM WEST REGIONAL WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT TO DEEP WELL RECLAIMED WATER PIPELINE (TASK ORDER NO. 2) INDIAN RIVER COUNTY PROJECT NO. IIS -92 -22 -ED BACKGROUND On September 17, and authorized th County Landfill. permitting stage. ready with Phase consists of the Wastewater Treatmi 1991, the Board of County Commissioners approved B design of a deep injection well located at the The deep well project presently is at the The Department of Utility Services is, therefore, II of the project. Phase II of the project design of pipe connecting the West Regional ant Plant to the deep well. 38 ANALYSIS Negotiations with CH2M Hill Southeast, Inc., for professional services to design a connector pipe from the West Regional WWTP to the deep well at the landfill have been completed, and Task Order No. 2 (Scope of Work) has been concluded. Task Order No. 2 consists of: Task 1 Design and Permitting Task -2 Services during Bidding, Construction and Resident Observation The professional consultant fees are described as follows: Basic Services (4.7% of estimated construction cost) $45,367.00 Resident Inspection (0.9% of estimated construction 9,000.00 cost) Additional Services Survey 4,558.00 Geotechnical 4,877.00 Surge Analysis 7,963.00 Permit 2,730.00 Direct Expenses, Printing 2.305.00 $76,800.00 The basic services and resident inspection services compensation are in accordance with FmHA guidelines. The estimated construction cost is $969,900.00. -The compensation for both services shall be adjusted based upon the final construction cost. Funding for design of this project shall be from the sewer impact fee fund. The Department of Utility Services recommends the Board of County Commissioners approve Task Order No. 2 and authorize the chairman of the Board of County Commissioners to execute Task Order No. 2. Commissioner Adams asked why we need a deep well for the effluent when we have our irrigation project, and why the wetlands cannot be used as a backup. Director Pinto explained that the first method of effluent disposal is irrigation and the wetlands are part of the irrigation project. We also have percolation ponds and direct irrigation. The deep well would back up those methods. Commissioner Adams was concerned about the basic concept of deep wells for effluent disposal because of situations where the well fails, and she gave, the examples of deep well failures at Hercules and in Melbourne. Director Pinto stated that the Hercules situation was not a failure of the well. They relined the inside of that well because it had been in use for 10 years and was in need of maintenance. The Melbourne system had problems associated with engineering and installation. He further explained that if a deep well were our primary method of disposal, we would need a second well as a backup for it. Our system consists of four different types of effluent disposal with the deep well is the backup for the others so the 39 FEBX993 BOOK BOOK 88 FarF 812 well would not be used on a daily basis. Our effluent is secondarily treated effluent which can be applied to land, and when it became necessary we would put that type of effluent down the well. At a depth of 3,000 feet the water is probably 100 parts per million of chlorides, so we actually would be putting cleaner water into that deep well than is there normally. The effluent meets secondary wastewater treatment standards but is classified by the DER as industrial waste so the well must be designed as an industrial waste well. There is non-specific effluent which does not meet the requirements for irrigation but receives secondary treatment and can be put down the deep well. More importantly, the leachate from the landfill could be put down a deep well. Our leachate is not toxic but it is considered industrial waste. Commissioner Bird clarified that the deep well would be used when all others fail and our emphasis is going to be on ground application or other ways of disposing of it rather than down the well. David Refling, Malcolm-Pirnie Consultants, stated that he was involved with the County in the original discussions and decisions on effluent disposal. He assured the Board that Indian River County's effluent disposal system which consists of several alternatives is the most environmentally responsible and cost- effective method. Reuse for irrigation also saves potable water reserves. The County's methods of trying to combine the highly treated leachate with the effluent is a sound concept to keep the costs down and have an environmentally acceptable alternative. Director Pinto further explained that the backup well would be used at times, for example after a hurricane, when the primary methods are out of operation and are being corrected. The well will be double -lined and able to take some of the nasty things that industrial plants normally discharge. Director Pinto expects that our effluent disposal volume in this county is going to be in the range of 30 million gallons a day. With reuse for irrigation, percolation ponds and direct irrigation, the addition of this deep well will put us in a strong position to take care of our needs. Further discussion ensued regarding the various methods of effluent disposal. Commissioner Macht led discussion regarding this particular issue as well as other items which appear on the agenda involving large expenditures of taxpayers' money. He felt he needed more time to study the backup material which is provided by staff to make a decision. Receiving the material on a Wednesday for a meeting on the following Tuesday did not give him enough time to do research and confer with staff. 40 Commissioner Eggert thought it would be helpful if the Utilities, Public Health and Community Development Departments brought him up-to-date on these matters. The new Commissioners have not had the benefit of the discussions which have taken place over the past two years regarding the deep well project. County Administrator Jim Chandler confirmed that there have been lengthy discussions regarding the alternatives and consequences of the deep well, after which staff and the Board made determinations and decisions on the direction we would take. He thought it might be beneficial to review this whole matter with the Board. Commissioner Macht agreed that is a good idea but he also thought that when we have a specific issue which involves three or four million dollars, the Board members should have an intervening week to meet with staff and study the material before making a decision. Director Pinto agreed that the decision on this issue could be delayed for a week. ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by Commissioner Tippin, the Board (4-1, Commissioner Adams voting in opposition) approved Task Order No. 2 with CM2H Hill Southeast, Inc., to design the connector pipe from the West Regional Wastewater Treatment Plant to the deep well at the landfill, as set out in staff's memorandum. 34TH AVENUE / PINEWOOD ESTATES WATER SERVICE, RESOLUTIONS I AND II Assessment Projects Manager James Chastain commented from the following: :1bi FEB 91993 Boa 88 : PnF. 813 DATE: JANUARY 29, 1993 TO: JAMES E. CHANDLER COUNTY ADMINISTRA' BOOK 88 P.AGF 814-1 FROM: TERRANCE G. PINTO DIRECTOR OF UTILIVTYSERVICES ICES PREPARED JAMES D. CHASTAAND STAFFED MANAGER OF ASSE SOJECTS BY: DEPARTMENT OF UT SUBJECT: 34TH AVENUE/PINEWOOD ESTATES WATER SERVICE INDIAN RIVER COUNTY PROJECT NO. UW -92 -25 -DS RESOLUTIONS I AND II BACKGROUND On July 21, 1992, the Indian River County Board of County Commissioners approved the creation of a separate assessment district for 34th Avenue water installation (copy attached). Originally this subdivision was approved for water service in the 12th Street assessment project. However, 34th Avenue is a private street without a utility easement other than along the rear lot lines. A utility easement and request for its execution was mailed as a part of the 12th Street assessment project to the pro ert owners, explaining that the installation of a water line in front of the properties would be more efficient and economical. The majority of the property owners did not consent to providing an easement in front of their properties. This required the redesign of this street as a separate project with two water lines running along existing rear lot line easements, at approximately 14.5% greater cost than the original preliminary assessment, which was approved by the Board of County Commissioners at the public hearing on June 18, 1991. The design work has now been completed by the Department of Utility Services' staff. We are now ready to begin the assessment process associated with this project (see attached agenda item and minutes). ANALYSIS Attached are Resolutions I and II for the assessment project. The total estimated -construction cost, including engineering and administration of the project is $32,236.00, which is the total estimated cost to be assessed. The cost per square foot is $0.090496. Nine properties will benefit from this service, as shown on the attached map. RECOMMENDATION The staff of the Department of Utility Board of County Commissioners approve which establish the public hearing date assessment roll. 42 Services recommends that the the attached Resolutions, and approve the preliminary ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED by Commissioner Eggert, the Board unanimously adopted Resolution 93-31 providing for water main extension to Pinewood Estates (34th Avenue), as recommended by staff. RESOLUTION NO. 93-_IjL_ A RESOLUTION OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, PROVIDING FOR WATER MAIN EXTENSION TO PINEWOOD ESTATES (34TH AVENUE); PROVIDING THE TOTAL ESTIMATED COST., METHOD OF PAYMENT OF ASSESSMENTS, NUMBER OF ANNUAL INSTALLMENTS, AND LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF THE AREA SPECIFICALLY SERVED. WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County has determined that the improvements herein described are necessary to promote the public welfare of the county and has determined to defray the cost thereof by special assessments against certain properties to be serviced by a water main extension to Pinewood Estates (34th Avenue), hereinafter referred to as Project No. UW -92 -25 -DS; . NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, as follows: 1. The County does hereby determine that a water main extension shall be installed to provide service for 9 properties, which are located generally as described above, and the cost thereof shall be specially assessed in accordance with the provisions of Sections 206.01 through 206.09 of the Code of Indian River County. 2. The total estimated project assessment cost of the above-described improvements is shown to be $32,236.00 or $0.090496 per square foot to be paid by the property specially benefited as shown on the assessment plat on file with the Department of Utility Services. 3. A special assessment in the amount of $0.090496 per square foot shall be assessed against each of the properties designated on the assessment plat. This assessment may be raised or lowered by action of the Board of County Commissioners after the public hearing, at the same meeting, as required by the referenced County Code. 43 booK FEB 199 R BOOK FEB END, ; 4. The special assessments shall be due and payable and may be paid in full within 90 days after the date of the resolution of the Board with respect to credits against the special assessments after completion of the improvements (the "Credit Date") without $ interest. If not paid in full, the special assessments may be paid in ten equal yearly installments of principal plus interest. If not paid when due, there shall be added a penalty of 1-1/2% of the principal not paid when due. The unpaid balance of the special assessments shall bear interest at a rate of 8% from the Credit Date until paid. 5. There is presently on file with the Department of Utility Services a plat showing the area to be assessed, plans and specifications, and an estimate of the cost of the proposed improvements. All of these are open to inspection by the public at the Department of Utility Services. 6. An assessment roll with respect to the special assessments shall promptly be prepared in connection with the special assessments. 7. Upon the .adoption of this resolution, the Indian River County Utility Services Department shall cause this resolution (along with a map showing the areas to be served) to be published at least one time in -the Vero Beach Press Journal before the. public hearing required by Section 206.04. The resolution was moved for adoption by Commissioner Adam_ , and the motion was seconded by Commissioner Eggert , and, upon being put to a vote, the vote was as follows: Chairman Richard N. Bird Aye -Vice Chairman John W. Tippin Aye Commissioner Carolyn K. Eggert Aye Commissioner Fran B. Adams Aye Commissioner Kenneth R. Macht Aye The Chairman thereupon declared the resolution duly passed and adopted this.9th day of February, 1993. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS INDIAN RIVER COUNTY,. FLORIDA By Richard N, Bird 44 Chairman ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED by Commissioner Eggert, the Board unanimously adopted Resolution 93-32, scheduling a public hearing at the hour of 9:05 a.m. on Tuesday, March 2, 1993, at which the owners of properties located generally in the area of Pinewood Estates (34th Avenue) and other interested persons may appear before the Board of County Commissioners and be heard, as recommended by staff. RESOLUTION 93-32, WITH PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL ATTACHED IS ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF CLERK TO THE BOARD RESOLUTION NO. 93-_U_ A RESOLUTION OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, SETTING A TIME AND PLACE AT WHICH THE OWNERS OF PROPERTIES LOCATED GENERALLY IN THE AREA OF PINEWOOD ESTATES (34TH AVENUE) AND OTHER INTERESTED PERSONS, MAY APPEAR BEFORE THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS AND BE HEARD AS TO THE PROPRIETY AND ADVISABILITY OF CONSTRUCTING A WATER MAIN, AS TO THE COST THEREOF, AS TO THE MANNER OF PAYMENT THEREFOR, AND AS TO THE AMOUNT THEREOF TO BE SPECIALLY ASSESSED AGAINST EACH PROPERTY BENEFITED THEREBY. WHEREAS, the Board ofCountyCommissioners of Indian River County has, by Resolution No. �, determined that it is necessary for the public welfare of the citizens of the county, and particularly as to those living, working, and owning property within the area described hereafter, that a waterline be installed to serve 9 properties hereinafter described; and WHEREAS, it has been determined that the cost to be specially assessed with respect thereto shall be $0.090496 per square foot; and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners has caused an assessment roll to be completed and filed with the Clerk to the Board; and WHEREAS, Section 206.06, Indian River County Code, requires that the Board of County Commissioners shall fix a time and place at which the owners of the properties to be assessed or any other persons interested therein may appear before the Board of County Commissioners and be heard as to the propriety and advisability of constructing such water main extension, as to the cost thereof, as to the manner of 45 L -FEB 91993 aooK 88 ,E F"' -FEB 9 1993 BOOK 88 Far,F$.� payment therefor, and as to the amount thereof to be assessed against each property benefited thereby, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, as follows: 1. The County Commission shall meet at the County Commission Chambers in the County Administration Building at the hour of 9:05 a.m. on Tuesday, March 2, 1993, at which time the owners of the properties to be assessed and any other interested persona may appear before said Commission and be heard in regard thereto. The area to be ' improved and the properties to be specially benefited are more particularly described upon the assessment plat and the assessment roll with regard to the special assessments. 2. All persons interested in the construction of said improvements and the special assessments against the properties to be specially benefited may review the assessment plat showing the area to be assessed, the assessment roll, the plans and specifications for said improvements, and an estimate of the cost thereof at the office of the Department of Utility Services any week day from 8:30 a.m. until 5:00 P.M. 3. Notice of the time and place of this public hearing shall be given by two publications in the Press Journal Newspaper one week apart. The last publication shall be at least one week prior'to the date of the hearing. The Indian River County Department of Utility Services shall give the owner of each property to be specially assessed at least ten days notice in writing, of such time and place, which shall be served by mailing a copy of such notice to each of such property owners at his last known address. 46 � � r The resolution was moved for adoption by Commissioner Arlamc , and the motion was seconded by CommissionerFgg_r�t`, and, upon being put to a vote, the vote was as follows: Chairman Richard N. Bird Aye Vice Chairman John W. Tippin Aye Commissioner Carolyn K. Eggert Aye Commissioner Fran B. Adams Aye Commissioner Kenneth R. Macht Aye The Chairman thereupon declared the resolution duly passed and adopted this 9th day of February, 1993. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA By ichard N. Bird Chairman DRAFT OF LETTER REGARDING TREASURE COAST REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL County Attorney Charles Vitunac presented the following proposed letter: 47 BOOK FEB 199 a BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS 1840 25th Street, Vero Beach, Florida 32960 Telephone: (407) 5674NM February 4, 1993 The Honorable Patsy Kurth Florida Senator State Senate - 16th District 258 Senate Office Building Tallahassee, FL 32399-1100 The Honorable Charles Sembler II Florida Representative State House - 78th District 407 House Office Building Tallahassee, FL 32399-1100 The Honorable Bill Posey Florida Representative State House - 32nd District 14 House office Building Tallahassee, FL 32399-1100 Dear Senator Kurth and Representatives Sembler and Posey: BOOK Suncom Telephone: 224-1011 -- The Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County is concerned about excessive state involvement in local planning and zoning decisions in general, and specifically is opposed to the extra layer of bureaucracy required by our county's involvement in the Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council. At the January 26, 1993, meeting of the Board of County Commissioners, the Board voted unanimously to relay our concerns about the Planning Council to our local delegation in hopes that the delegation could sponsor some remedial legislation. The Board's first choice would be to abolish the Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council entirely, or, if that is not possible, to restrict its powers to planning and advice -giving only without any direct control over local governing bodies power to plan and zone. The Board feels that any regional cooperation necessitated by any project can be handled better by the counties of Martin, -St. Lucie, Okeechobee, and Indian River through the local council of governments, which is in existence in the four -county area. We request your support for the ideas mentioned in this letter and would be happy to meet with you or your staffs in our county or in Tallahassee at any hearings which might be scheduled on bills relating to these matters. Please let us know how we can assist you. Sincerely, BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Richard N. Bird Chairman 48 County Attorney Charles Vitunac reported that he discussed the prepared letter with Executive Director Dan Carey and Mr. Carey asked for an opportunity to respond to the letter before it is sent. Discussion ensued regarding minor changes in the letter, and Chairman Bird felt that the Board should hear from Mr. Carey before making a decision. Dan Carey, executive director of the Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council (TCRPC), clarified that TCRPC and other regional planning councils are not state agencies. They work for local governments. He thought the regional planning councils are basically a good forum where local governments can discuss and solve shared problems, and there have been good results from the combined efforts of the local governments and the TCRPC. He was not aware of the Board's strong feelings until he read the proposed letter. He asked for the opportunity to discuss this issue in detail at a workshop before the proposed letter is sent. He planned to meet with all the local governments that are members of the TCRPC and hear their comments as well. Discussion ensued regarding the possible changes in the TCRPC's responsibility. Commissioners Tippin and Eggert thought the letter should not be sent until after the workshop. Commissioner Macht preferred to send the letter without delay because the language of the letter gives the alternative of reconfiguring the TCRPC's responsibility. He had no further interest in the TCRPC as long as Palm Beach County continues as a member. MOTION WAS MADE by Commissioner Tippin, SECONDED by Commissioner Eggert, to table a decision regarding the proposed letter and schedule a workshop at 9:00 a.m. on Wednesday, February 17, 1993 on the subject of the Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council. Commissioner Eggert wanted to wait until after the workshop to send the letter because the TCRPC has done good things and we need to discuss all the possibilities. Commissioner Adams thought the workshop should include individuals whose items have been reviewed by the TCRPC as well as the other members of the TCRPC. THE CHAIRMAN CALLED FOR THE QUESTION. It was voted on and carried unanimously. 49 $ FEB 1993 BOOK $F.+,;F$�. r FEB 91993 BOOK D ,: RESOLUTION ENDORSING DREDGING OF PORT OF FORT PIERCE ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by Commissioner Tippin, the Board unanimously adopted Resolution 93-33 endorsing dredging of Port of Fort Pierce. RESOLUTION NO. 93- 33 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, ENDORSING DREDGING OF PORT OF FORT PIERCE. WHEREAS, Indian River County is located just north of the Port of Fort Pierce; and WHEREAS, proposed dredging to the Port of Fort Pierce will have beneficial effects on the economy in Indian River County; and WHEREAS, it appears the said improvements can be accomplished with minimal environmental costs, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, • FLORIDA that the -Board supports the dredging to the Port of Fort Pierce because: I. This dredging will have a beneficial on the economy in Indian River County. 2. This expansion may be accomplished with minimal environmental costs. 3. The high rate of unemployment in Indian River County should be lessened by the strengthening of the economy resulting from said improvements. The resolution was moved to adoption by Commissioner Eggert and the motion was seconded by Commissioner Tippin and, upon being put to a vote, the vote was as follows: Chairman Richard N. Bird Aye Vice Chairman John W. Tippin Aye Commissioner Carolyn K. Eggert Aye Commissioner Fran B. Adams Aye ' — Commissioner Kenneth R. Macht Aye The Chairman thereupon declared the resolution duly passed and adopted this 1 9 day of February 1993. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA By 50 R chard N. Bir Chairman � � r DISCUSSION RE: BILLS LISTED IN FLORIDA ASSOCIATION OF COUNTIES BULLETIN - ELMS III REPORT AND TOURIST DEVELOPMENT TAB PROPOSAL Commissioner Eggert pointed out two items listed in the February 8, 1993 edition of InterFac, the official publication of the Florida Association of Counties. One item concerned an upcoming bill regarding the ELMS III report and the other was the Tourist Development Tax Proposal to limit counties' use of locally generated tourism revenues. Commissioner Eggert was aware these are important issues and asked the County Attorney to advise the Board when copies of those bills are received. APPROVAL OF OUT -OF -COUNTY TRAVEL - TREASURE COAST LEGISLATIVE CONFERENCE IN TALLAHASSEE, MARCH 1-3, 1993 Commissioner Macht felt it was very important that we be represented at the Treasure Coast Legislative Conference. ON MOTION by Commissioner Macht, SECONDED by Commissioner Tippin, the Board unanimously authorized out -of -county travel for Chairman Bird and a member of Community Development staff to attend the Treasure Coast Legislative Conference in Tallahassee from March 1 through 3, 1993. SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL DISTRICT Chairman Bird announced that immediately upon adjournment the Board would reconvene sitting as the Board of Commissioners of the Solid Waste Disposal District. Those Minutes are being prepared separately. There being no further business, on Motion duly made, seconded and carried, the Board adjourned at 11:15 A. M. ATTEST: J.rton, Clerk 51 Richard N. Bird, Chairman kE B 9 1993 BOOK 88 PAGE S.23