The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About3/9/1993� MINUTES ATTACHED7 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA AGENDA REPPOLAR MEETING TUESDAY, MARCH 9. 1993 9:00 A.M. -'COUNTY COMMISSION CHAMBER COUNTY ADMINISTRATION BUILDING 1840 25TH STREET VERO BEACH, FLORIDA COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Richard N. Bird, Chairman (Dist. 5) . John W. Tippin, Vice Chairman (Dist. 4) Fran B. Adams ( Dist. 1) Carolyn K. Eggert ( Dist. 2 ) Kenneth R. Macht ( Dist.. 3 ) James E. Chandler, County Administrator Charles P. Vitunac, County Attorney Jeffrey K. Barton, Clerk to the Board 9:00 A. M. 1. CALL TO ORDER 2. INVOCATION - None 3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE - Comm. John W. Tippin 4. ADDITIONS TO THE AGENDA/EMERGENCY ITEMS ... Withdrawal of Public Hearings 9-B-3 and 9-B-4 ... SWDD Meeting moved forward to 9-A ... Addition of county -initiated rezoning in Geoffrey S/D Addition of report by Chm. Bird on trip to Tallahassee ... Addition of Emergency Services District Meeting S. PROCLAMATION AND PRESENTATIONS A. Recycling Award Certificate Presented to John Guiliano B. Adoption and Presentation of Proclamation Designating 3/14/93 as Pelican Island Day 6. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Regular Meeting of 2/2/93 7. CONSENT AGENDA A. Received and Placed on File: Florida Inland Navigation District, 1993 Facilities Report Fellsmere Water Control District, Minutes of the Board of Supervisors Meeting for Fiscal Year 1991-92 Report of Convictions, Month of February 1993 B. Proclamation Designating March 23, 1993 as American Diabetes Alert Day in I.R.C. C. Request for Floodplain Cut and Fill Balance Waiver for Sunset Point S/D ( memorandum dated March 1, 1993 ) BAR ® 91993 BOOK 88 f',�,H 1001 J MAR ® 91993 BOOK 88 PA11- 00 7. CONSENT AGENDA (cont'd. ): D. Tax Deed Applications ( memorandum dated March 1, 1993 ) E. Grand Harbor Construction Assignment of Warranty to County ( memorandum dated February 25,'1993) F. Cancellation of Outstanding Taxes Property Purchased for County Use ( memorandum dated March 1, 1993 ) 8. CONSTITUTIONAL OFFICERS AND GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES None 9:05 a. m. 9. PUBLIC ITEMS A. PUBLIC DISCUSSION ITEMS None B.' PUBLIC HEARINGS - 1. 34th Ave. /Pinewood Estates Water Service Resolution III ( memorandum dated February 18, 1993 ) 2. AN ORDINANCE OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, ADDING A NEW CHAPTER 202 ENTITLED COUNTY RECLAIMED WATER TO THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, PROVIDING FOR REPEAL OF CONFLICTING PROVISIONS, CODIFICATION, SEVERABILITY AND EFFEC- TIVE DATE ( memorandum dated February 23, 1993 ) 3. AN ORDINANCE OF. -INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA AMENDING SECTION 100.05, INDIAN RIVER COUNTY CODE TO MAKE THE GENERAL PENALTY PROVISIONS APPLICABLE TO ORDINANCES PRIOR TO CODIFICATION 4. AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA AMENDING SECTION 307.02 CON- CERNING PARKING SPACES FOR CERTAIN HANDICAPPED PERSONS 10. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S MATTERS None 11. DEPARTMENTAL MATTERS A. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 1. Federal Functional Classification ( memorandum dated March 2, 1993 ) � � r 11. DEPARTMENTAL MATTERS (cont'd. ): A. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT (cont'd. ): 2. Sebastian City Council Request for Withdrawer of the "Sebastian Scrub" FCT Grant Application ( memorandum dated March 1, 1993 ) B. EMERGENCY SERVICES Approval of Resolution Amending the Fees, Penalties, and Procedures Related to the Enforcement of the Animal Control Ordinance ( memorandum dated March 1, 1993 ) C. GENERAL SERVICES 1. Award Bid #3060/Water Expansion Plan Contract C ( memorandum dated February 23, 1993 ) 2. Award Bid #3061 /Water Expansion Plan Phase II - Contract D ( memorandum dated February 25, 1993 ) 3. Award Bid #3051 /West Regional Sewer Plant Force Main ( memorandum dated February 25, 1993 ) 4. Award Bid #3056/Western Subregional Effluent Pump Station ( memorandum dated February 25, 1993) - 5. Award Bid #3069/Roseland Water Tower Project ( memorandum dated February 25, 1993 ) D. LEISURE SERVICES None E. OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET None F. PERSONNEL None G. PUBLIC WORKS None H. UTILITIES 1. Final Pay Request and Change Order No. 1 North County Water Distribution System, Phase I ( memorandum dated February 22, 1993 ) 2. Request for Proposals for Utilities Department Survey Needs ( memorandum dated February 26, 1993 3. Lead and Copper Test Requirements and Results for I.R.C. So. Co. RO Facility ( memorandum dated March 1, 1993 ) MAR - 9 1993 BOOK 88 F-,,cF D®3• BOOK O8 FA(F 100 7 EM -6 ®SdW -7 11. DEPARTMENTAL MATTERS (cont'd. ): H. UTILITIES cont'd. : 4. Analysis of the Base Facility Charge Component of the Current Rate Structure ( memorandum dated February 24, 1993 ) S. Water Service to 102nd Terrace and 99th Way, Resolutions I and 11 ( memorandum dated February 26, 1993 ) 6. Wastewater Service to 102nd Terrace and 99th Way, Resolutions I and II ( memorandum dated February 26, 1993 ) 12. COUNTY ATTORNEY None 13. COMMISSIONERS ITEMS A. CHAIRMAN RICHARD N. BIRD Appointment to fill Executive Aide Position B. VICE CHAIRMAN JOHN W. TIPPIN Resolution Regarding Treasure Coast Council of Local Governments C. COMMISSIONER FRAN B. ADAMS 1. Letter of Support for Appointment of Ornamental Horticultural Agent ( memorandum dated March 3, 1993 ) 2. Appointment to Beach Committee ( memorandum dated March 3, 1993 ) D. COMMISSIONER CAROLYN K. EGGERT 1. Request for Increased Funding - Indian River County Council on Aging, Inc./ Community Coach Bus Stop Signage ( memorandum dated March 3, 1993 ) 2. W. E. Geoffrey Subdivision ( memorandum dated March 3, 1993 ) E. COMMISSIONER KENNETH R. MACHT 14. SPECIAL DISTRICTS A. EMERGENCY SERVICES DISTRICT mom B. SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL DISTRICT Waste Tire / Mosquito Control Grant ( memorandum dated February 25, 1993 ) 15. ADJOURNMENT ANYONE WHO MAY WISH TO APPEAL ANY DECISION WHICH MAY BE MADE AT THIS MEETING WILL NEED TO ENSURE THAT A VERBATIM RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS IS MADE WHICH INCLUDES THE TESTIMONY AND EVIDENCE UPON WHICH THE APPEAL WILL BE BASED. ANYONE WHO NEEDS A SPECIAL ACCOMMODATION FOR THIS CONTACT THE COUNTY'S AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES COORDINATOR AT 56708000 X 408 AT LEAST 48 HOURS IN MEETING. MEETING MAY ACT (ADA) ADVANCE OF MAR - 9 1993 BOOK 88 Fa,F1006 Tuesday, March 9, 1993 The Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida, met in Regular Session at the County Commission Chambers, 1840 25th Street, Vero Beach, Florida, on Tuesday, March 9, 1993, at 9:00 o'clock A.M. Present were Richard N. Bird, Chairman; John W. Tippin, Vice Chairman; Fran B. Adams; Carolyn K. Eggert; and Kenneth R. Macht. Also present were James E. Chandler, County Administrator; Charles P. Vitunac, County Attorney; and Barbara Bonnah, Deputy Clerk. Vice Chairman Tippin called the meeting to order and announced that Chairman Bird would be arriving late this morning because he is making a presentation at Citrus Elementary School. Vice Chairman Tippin led the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag. ADDITIONS TO THE AGENDA/EMERGENCY ITEMS Commissioner Eggert requested, on an emergency basis, the addition to today's SWDD agenda of a request by Mr. Vernon Reason to speak in regard to his receiving a notice to cease and desist his garbage pickup service in the Wabasso/Gifford area in 15 days. She requested that the SWDD meeting be held right after today's Consent Agenda items. Commissioner Eggert also requested the addition under her matters of a discussion regarding a county -initiated rezoning in Geoffrey Subdivision. Attorney Vitunac advised that Public Hearings 9-B-3 and 9-B-4 were advertised for March 23, 1993 and must be postponed until that date. With regard to 9-B-1, Pinewood Estates, Attorney Vitunac pointed out that we actually had the public hearing last week. As it turns out, the newspaper notice said the hearing was this week, but the letter sent to individual property owners said the public hearing would be held last week. So they all knew it and came and had their hearing, but it was advertised for today. He advised that we will go through the public hearing today, but we should not expect anyone to be here. The only other choice would be to start again, but the people want the water and to delay it wouldn't help. boor MAR 1993 BOOK 88 FA -u 100 7 -7 Upon Chairman Bird's arrival at 9:40 A.M., he requested the addition of a brief report on the Treasure Coast Legislative Meeting in Tallahassee on March 1-3, 1993. Chairman Bird also requested the addition of an Emergency Services District meeting for the purpose of formally designating a Chairman and Vice Chairman. ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED by Commissioner Eggert, the Board unanimously (4-0, Commissioner Bird being delayed) added and withdrew the above items. PROCLAMATIONS AND PRESENTATIONS A. Recycling Award Certificate Presented to John Guiliano The Board reviewed the following memo dated 2/17/93: DATE: FEBRUARY 17, 1993 TO: JAMES E. CHANDLER COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR THRU: TERRANCE G. PINTO, DIRECTOR ;% WASTE DISPOSAL DIS 001(' FROM: BAM ROBLFING, RECYCLING COORDINATOR SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL DISTRICT SUBJECT: RECYCLING AWARD CERTIFICATE JOHN GUILIANO ff 4' •1 06 In order to recognize individuals and/or organizations which have Put forth extra effort for recycling in Indian River county, the Solid Waste Disposal District initiated an Award Certificate program. Certificates are awarded whenever such an individual is identified. The awards are presented in person by the Recycling Coordinator or other appropriate SWDD recycling representative. CONCLUSION Because this month's award recipients include a county employee, John Guiliano, Building and Grounds, it is appropriate that the award presentation take place during a County Commission meeting. SWDD staff therefore recommends that John Guiliano's recycling award presentation take place at the next available County commission meeting and, to that end, that said presentation be placed in the appropriate slot on the Commission agenda. 2 Vice Chairman Tippin presented the following certificate to John Guiliano: ?his is to ce,44 tkcit • _... ~:JOHN•GUILIANO - G- deme trated concern' grid care .-°f tke environment tkrough active suppa'rt of recycfucg efforts ~ utit6il Indian River CountyIT %s r_ = afi6 cfDitarct M1fmuu�a __ .a� � C.> ..vzt -•.: :: ;-,,�:.�* ..._-�F�x�;�p:y® Hca s',,ii:.:aar=xki'r� a_ PIEWIED ON RECYUED PAPHI B. AdoRtion and Presentation of Proclamation Designating March 14 1993 as Pelican Island Day ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by Commissioner Adams, the Board unanimously (4-0, Commissioner Bird being delayed) designated March 14, 1993 as Pelican Island Day. Vice Chairman Tippin presented the following Proclamation to Ranger Paul Tritak of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, who invited the Board and public to attend the ceremonies to be held Sunday, March 14, at 2:00 P.M. when the Proclamation will be read again. 3 MAR - 91993 800K 88 FarF 106 8 MAR 9 199 1009 PROCLAMATION WHEREAS, the Pelican Island Indian River County National Wildlife Refuge was established on March 14, 1903 by Theodore Roosevelt the 26th President of the United States of America to protect the -nesting birds on Pelican Island; and WHEREAS, this was the first wildlife refuge in the North American system which now numbers over 500 refuges; and WHEREAS, March 14, 1993 will mark the 90th Anniversary of the establishment of this refuge, NOW, THEREFORE, be it Proclaimed by the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida that March 14, 1993 be designated as PELICAN ISLAND DAY in recognition of the beginning of a wildlife refuge system which will serve to protect our native wildlife for generations to come. APPROVED and ADOPTED on March 9, 1993. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY By Richard N. Bird Chairman APPROVAL OF MINUTES The Vice Chairman asked if there were any corrections to the Minutes of the Regular Meeting of February 2, 1993. There were none. ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by Commissioner Adams, the Board unanimously (4-0, Commissioner Bird being delayed) approved the Minutes of the Regular Meeting of 2/2/93, as written. 4 C 1 CONSENT AGENDA A. Received and Placed on File: Florida Inland Navigation District, 1993 Facilities Report Fellsmere Water Control District, Minutes of the Board of Supervisors Meeting for Fiscal Year 1991-92 -Report of Convictions, Month of February, 1993 B. Proclamation Designating American Diabetes Alert Day in IRC 1. P R O C L A M A T I O N DESIGNATING MARCH 23, 1993 AS AMERICAN DIABETES ALERT DAY 1N INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA WHEREAS, more than 7 10.134un Americi+ns do iwit: know they have diabc•t.es, a disease with no curt that imhaiis tile leudy's ability to canvelt fc,ud sugar i.ntu vrvett y; algid WHEREAS, diabetes is the foterth leading cause of death by disease in thce United States; and WI)EREAS, in this year alone, more than 750,000 Americans will contract the disease and 150,000 will die from it, including a dispraport3onat:e number of Hispanics, Black Americans, arid American Indiana; and WItEREAS, people whusee cliabetps goe;: undiagnosed and ulet.reeated ale slibiect: to any of its serious complications, such fis lllinclneeF:la, heart. di:~tlefie', kidney d3:e'af•e, ;:i.Ic:kc, anc7 leg or foot amputations; and IkitERF,AS, an 31)t.:7:-f1fsN Ill C'tele�ml)1�31 iiwax vj-C sr< (if cliabetes, its human impact, and t.hee Awns Jean Ditebetes Asseeciatian, may st3nn17Hte p111133C act3.eu) 3n incrNasing' re-se•alcle toward a cure, and spur individual awareness ahuut w110 is sucice•pt3hle to diabetes before Le or. 141ee is canflulet.ed with one of 3t:: compl3Cations: NOW, 7'HFtItF,F'Ukk, ItF; ]!1' I'It0(3-AI.PJ0) By THE HOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN )'IV) -.)I COUNTY, FLORIDA that the day of March 23, 1993 be designated as AMERICAN DIABETES ALERT DAY in Indian River Cou1)ty. The Board further urrgFes all citizens of Indian River County to harta.10314e1e in tffc-rt.s that deteerlueine+ individual risk for diabetes, sound the alert. ahaut diabetes in our community., and Support reseal cb to end diabetes algid improve the lives of all those who have this disease. A14 -41A this 9th day of March, 1993. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA Richard N. Bird, C71 irman 5 F, g� BOOK 88 PAGE 1011 C. Reguest for Floodulain Cut and Fill Balance Waiver for Sunset Point Subdivision The Board reviewed the following memo dated 3/1/93: TO: THROUGH: FROM: SUMCT: DATE: James Chandler County Administrator James W. Davis, P.E. Public Works Director and Roger D. Cain, P.E. County Engineer David B. Cox, P.E. Civil Engineer Request for Floodplain Cut and Fill Balance Waiver for Sunset Point Subdivision March 1, 1993 CONSENT AGENDA Todd N. Smith, P.E., on behalf of Jack Krovocheck, developer of Sunset Point Subdivision is requesting a waiver of the cut and fill balance requirement of Section 930.07(2)(d) of the Stormwater Management and Flood Protection Ordinance. Sunset Point Subdivision received Preliminary plat approval by the Planning & Zoning Commission on December 10, 1992. The project is located on the west side of S.R. A -1-A in Sections 16 and 17, Township 33 south, Range 40 east, approximately 6/10 mile south of the Vero Beach city limits directly across from Pelican Lane. The special flood hazard areas inundated by the 100 year flood on this site are in Zone AE with base flood elevations of 5, 6, and 7 FT. N.G.V.D. The ten year stillwater elevation for the Indian River, at this site, established in the May 4, 1989 F.E.M.A. Flood Insurance Study is 3.3 FT N.G.V.D. The proposed displacement of the floodplain below 4.0 FT. N.G.V.D. for which a waiver is requested is estimated as 586 cubic yards by the applicant's engineer in the attached letter dated February 24, 1993. A previous cut and fill waiver was granted for this project by the Board of County Commissioners at their regular meeting of July 7, 1992 for filling 0.28 acres of wetlands/deepwater habitat in conjunction with issuance of a County Wetlands Resource Permit. The subject waiver request is for additional fill required to construct the subdivision roadway and lot grading. The project meets the cut and fill balance waiver criteria provided in Section 930.07(2)(d)1. of being situated in an estuarine environment within the 100 year floodplain along the Indian River and in staffs opinion it appears that all other Stormwater Management and Flood Protection Ordinance requirements can be met without adverse impact on other lands in the estuarine environment. A S.J.R.W.M.D. Wetland Resource Management Permit Number 12-061-0028 has been issued for construction of the stormwater management system. Approval of the Land Development Permit is pending the cut and fill waiver request, and issuance of F.D.O.T. driveway and drainage connection, and F.D.E.R. water and sewer connection permits. 6 Approve the cut and fill balance waiver request. Deny the waiver request and require re -design to accomplish an on-site balance of cut and fill. Staff recommends approval of Alternative No. 1. ON MOTION by Commissioner Macht, SECONDED by Commissioner Adams, the Board unanimously (4-0, Commissioner Bird being delayed) approved a Floodplain Cut and Fill Balance Waiver for Sunset Point Subdivision, as recommended by staff. D. Tax Deed Applications The Board reviewed the following memo dated 3/1/93: TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS FROM: Charles P. Vitunac, County Attorney DATE: March 1, 1993 RE: TAX DEED APPLICATIONS Mr. Karl Zimmermann, the Tax Collector, has notified this office that there are 13 tax certificates held by Indian River County which are eligible for tax deed applications. Therefore, it is necessary for the County to sign the attached applications and then return them along with $975 ($75 per parcel/20-year title search fee). REQUESTED ACTION: Board authorize the payment of the $975 tax deed application fee and the Chairman's signing the attached tax deed applications on behalf of the County. 7 BAR m 91993 Boa 88 F°,UF.1012 I MAR _ 9 199 BOOK ON MOTION by Commissioner Macht, SECONDED by Commissioner Adams, the Board unanimously (4-0, Commissioner Bird being delayed) authorized payment of the $975 tax deed application fee and authorized the Chairman to sign the 13 tax deed applications listed below, as requested by Tax Collector Karl Zimmermann. COPIES OF TAX DEED APPLICATIONS ARE ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD Tax Collector TAX CERTIFICATES HELD BY INDIAN RIVER COUNTY NOW ELIGIBLE FOR TAX DEED APPLICATIONS. CERT. NO. DATE OF SALE LEGAL DESCRIPTION 1818 6/2/89 SPRUCE PARK SUB LOT 5 BLK 11 1823 6/2/89 ESPYS SUB LOTS 50, 51 & 52 LESS S 20 FT & LESS HWY R/W 1864 6/2/89 ADD. TO JACKSONS SUB S 50 FT OF LOT 28 1871 6/2/89 BOOKER T WASHINGTON ADD LOT 15 BLK 2 1877 6/1/88 VERO TROPICAL GARDENS SUB UNIT 2 LOT 6 BLK X 1742 6/2/89 28 31 39 00007 0000 00017.0 JOHN W. MASSEY, JR. SUB FROM THE SW COR OF SEC 28 RUN N ALONG ETC. 1846 6/1/88 BEG 430 FT W OF SE COR OF ANNIE GRAY BATTLE TRACE RUN N 105 FT, W 50 FT, S 105 FT, E 50 FT TO P.O.B. 1768 6/2/89 BEG AT SE COR OS SW1/4, RUN N 250 FT FOR POB, N 50 FT, W 150 FT, S 50 FT. E 150 FT TO P.O.B. 1863 6/2/89 ADD.TO JACKSONS SUB N 50 FT OF LOT 22 1807 6/2/89 HILLCREST SUB LOTS 3 & 4 BLK 2 1765 6/2/89 COM AT SE COR OF SW 1/4, RUN N 930 FT TO P.O.B. N 100 FT, W 150 FT, S 100 FT, E 150 FT TO P.O.B. 1860 6/1/88 COM AT SW COR OF E 1/2 OF NW 1/4 t OF NE 1/4 & RUN E 105 FT FOR POB �l`� `�'� , ! ! RUN E 123 FT N 95 FT W 123 FT S 95 FT TO POB LESS S 35 FT & `f E 35 FT FOR RD R/W 1832 6/1/88 22 32 39 00000 5000 00072.4 BEG AT NE COR OF SE 1/4 OF SW 1/4, RUN W 166 FT TO POB; CONT W 139.87 FT; RUN S ALONG E LINE OF LORD CALVERT ESTATES SUB ETC. 8. E. Grand Harbor Construction Assignment of Warranty to County The Board reviewed the following memo dated 2/25/93: TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS FROM: Charles P. Vitunac, County Attorney DATE: February 25, 1993 RE: GRAND HARBOR CONSTRUCTION ASSIGNMENT OF WARRANTY TO COUNTY The Development Order for Grand Harbor required that certain utility improvements be constructed. The contractor has issued a warranty in favor of Grand Harbor, and Grand Harbor is now assigning the Maintenance Bond to the County. The attached agreement is this Assignment and requires the signature of the Chairman to accept it on behalf of the Board.._ If for some reason the Assignment fails and there is warranty work to be performed, Grand Harbor has agreed to enforce the Maintenance Bond according to its terms. REQUESTED ACTION: The Board authorize the Chairman to execute the attached Assignment. ON MOTION by Commissioner Macht, SECONDED by Commissioner Adams, the Board unanimously (4-0, Commissioner Bird being delayed) approved the Assignment of Rights Under Maintenance Bond, as recommended by staff. ASSIGNMENT IS ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD 9 BOOK $8 �'� GE 1011 � 91993 BOOK 88 PAGE 1015-7 F. Cancellation of Outstanding Taxes on Property Purchased for County Use The Board reviewed the following memo dated 3/1/93: TO: BOARD OF COUNTY �� (,) - 44ju, FROM: Lea R. Keller, CLA, County Attorney's Office DATE: March 1, 1993 RE: CANCELLATION OF OUTSTANDING TABES PROPERTY PURCHASED FOR COUNTY USE The County has recently acquired some right-of-way, and, pursuant to Section 196.28, Florida Statutes, the Board of County Commissioners is allowed to cancel and discharge any taxes owed on the portion of the property acquired for public purposes. Such cancellation must be done by resolution of the Board with a certified copy being forwarded to the Tax Collector. REQUESTED ACTION: Board authorize the Chairman to sign the attached resolutions cancelling taxes upon lands the County recently acquired. Attachments: Resolutions (1) Rex E. and Roy K. Thompson R/W on cherry Lane - 33rd Street (2) George A� and Jean C. Yates R/W on .4th Street - Bike Path (3) James R. and Carol M. Beath R/W on 4th Street - Bike Path (4) Laura Lathero Gay (6.0) R/W on 129th Street (5) Laura Lathero Gay (7.0) R/W on 129th Street (6) Marcus and Brenda L. Vigneri R/W on 129th Street (7) Richard W. and Doris M. Welch R/W on 129th Court (8) Richard and Lucille M. Reck R/W on 129th Court (9) George Bergold R/W on 129th Court (10) Michael R. and Patricia J. Moyer R/W on 129th Court (11) Johnny H. Johnson and Edward W. Elliot et al. R/W on 66th Avenue 10 ON MOTION by Commissioner Macht, SECONDED by Commissioner Adams, the Board unanimously (4-0, Commissioner Bird being delayed) adopted Resolutions 93-45 to 93-55, cancelling certain delinquent taxes upon publicly -owned lands, pursuant to Section 196.28, Florida Statutes. 11 MAR ® 9 199.3 BOOK 88 P4F 1016 MAR - 9 1993 Re: R/W Cherry Lane (33rd Street) RESOLUTION NO. 93-__U 60QKPA-7 GE 101 A RESOLUTION OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, CANCELLING CERTAIN DELINQUENT TAXES UPON PUBLICLY -OWNED LANDS, PUR- SUANT TO SECTION 196.28, FLORIDA STATUTES. WHEREAS, section 196.28, Florida Statutes, allows the Board of County Commissioners of each County to cancel and discharge any and all liens for taxes, delinquent or current, held or owned by the county or the state, upon lands heretofore or hereafter conveyed to or acquired by any agency, governmental subdivision, or municipality of the state, or the United States, for road purposes, defense purposes, recreation, reforestation, or other public use; and WHEREAS, such cancellation must be by resolution of the Board of County Commissioners, duly adopted and entered upon its minutes properly describing such lands and setting forth the public use to which the same are or will be devoted; and WHEREAS, upon receipt of a certified copy of such resolution, proper officials of the county and of the state are authorized, empowered, and directed to make proper entries upon the records to accomplish such cancellation and to do all things necessary to carry out the provisions of section 196.28, F.S.; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that any and all liens for taxes, delinquent or current, against the property described in O.R. Book 961, Page 2686, which was recently acquired by Indian River County for right of way purposes on Cherry Lane (33rd Street) , are hereby cancelled, pursuant to the authority of section 196.28, F.S. The resolution was moved for adoption by Commissioner Macht and the motion was seconded by Commissioner Arjams , and, upon being put to a vote, the vote was as follows: Chairman Richard N. Bird Absent Vice Chairman John W.' Tippin Aye Commissioner Carolyn K. Eggert Aye Commissioner Fran B. Adams Aye Commissioner Kenneth R. Macht Aye The Chairman thereupon declared the resolution duly passed and adopted this 9 day of March 1993. Attest: Jeffrey K . arton, Cle y• - r BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA By �l Richard N. Bird Chairman Attachment: Copy of Executed Deed 12 � � r Re: R/W 4th Street Bike Path RESOLUTION NO. 93-_4.6_ A RESOLUTION OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, CANCELLING CERTAIN DELINQUENT TAXES UPON PUBLICLY -OWNED LANDS, PUR- SUANT TO SECTION 196.289 FLORIDA STATUTES. WHEREAS, section 196.28, Florida Statutes, allows the Board of County Commissioners of each County to cancel and discharge any and all liens for taxes, delinquent or current, held or owned by the county or the state, upon lands heretofore or hereafter conveyed to or acquired by any agency, governmental subdivision, or municipality of the state, or the United States, for road purposes, defense purposes, recreation, reforestation, or other public use; and WHEREAS, such cancellation must be by resolution of the Board of County Commissioners, duly adopted and entered upon its minutes properly describing such lands and setting forth the public use to which the same are or will be devoted; and WHEREAS, upon receipt of a - certified copy of such resolution, proper officials of the county and of the state are authorized, empowered, and directed to make proper entries upon the records to accomplish such cancellation and to do all things necessary to carry out the provisions of section 196.28, F.S.; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, 'FLORIDA, that any and all liens for taxes, delinquent or current, against the property described in O.R. Book 962, Page 1255, which was recently acquired by Indian River County for right of way purposes for the 4th Street Bike Path, are hereby cancelled, pursuant to the authority of section 196.28, F.S. The resolution was moved for adoption by Commissioner Macht , and the motion was seconded by Commissioner Adams , and, upon being put to a vote, the vote was as follows: Chairman Richard N. Bird Absent Vice Chairman John W. Tippin Aye Commissioner Carolyn K. Eggert Aye Commissioner Fran B. Adams Aye Commissioner Kenneth R. Macht Aye The Chairman thereupon declared the resolution duly passed and adopted this 9 day of Attest: March , 1993. JeffreyanyxW�;;e= �C BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA By Richard N. Bird Chairman Attachment: Copy of Executed Deed 13 MAS 0 919 BOOK 88 F.,vF 10 � e� J r� MAR - 9 1993 BOOK 88 D'iF 109 7 Re: R/W 4th Street Bike Path RESOLUTION NO. 93- 47 A RESOLUTION OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, CANCELLING CERTAIN DELINQUENT TAXES UPON PUBLICLY -OWNED LANDS, PUR- SUANT TO SECTION 198.28, FLORIDA STATUTES. WHEREAS, section 196.28, Florida Statutes, allows the Board of County Commissioners of each County to cancel and discharge any and all liens for taxes, delinquent or current, held or owned by the county or the state, upon lands heretofore or hereafter conveyed to or acquired by any agency, governmental subdivision, or municipality of the state, or the United States, for road purposes, defense purposes, recreation, reforestation, or other public use; and WHEREAS, such cancellation must be by resolution of the Board of County Commissioners, duly adopted and entered upon its minutes properly describing such lands and setting forth the public use to which the same are or will be devoted; and WHEREAS, upon receipt of a certified copy of such resolution, proper Officials of the county and of the state are authorized, empowered, and directed to make proper entries upon the records to accomplish such cancellation and to do all things necessary to carry out the provisions of section 196.28, F.S.; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that any and all liens for taxes, delinquent or current, against the property described in O.R. Book 9839 Page 492, which was recently acquired by Indian River County for right of way purposes for the 4th Street Bike Path, are hereby cancelled, pursuant to the authority of section 196.28, F.S. The resolution was moved for adoption by Commissioner Macht and the motion was seconded b Commissioner Y _Adams and, upon being put to a vote, the vote was as follows: Chairman Richard N. Bird Absent Vice Chairman John W. Tippin Aye Commissioner Carolyn K. Eggert Aye Commissioner Fran B. Adams Aye Commissioner Kenneth R. Macht Aye The Chairman thereupon declared the resolution duly passed and adopted this 9 day of March , 1993. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS 7st:INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA Jeffrey K. Barton, Cletrk, Richard N. Bird Chairman Attachment: Copy of Executed Deed 14 Re: 129th Street RESOLUTION NO. 93-_" A RESOLUTION OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, CANCELLING CERTAIN DELINQUENT TAXES UPON PUBLICLY -OWNED LANDS, PUR- SUANT TO SECTION 196.289 FLORIDA STATUTES. WHEREAS, section 196.28, Florida Statutes, allows the Board of County Commissioners of each County to cancel and discharge any and all liens for taxes, delinquent or current, held or owned by the county or the state, upon lands heretofore or hereafter conveyed to or acquired by any agency, governmental subdivision, or municipality of the state, or the United States, for road purposes, defense purposes, recreation, reforestation, or other public use; and WHEREAS, such cancellation must be by resolution of the Board of County Commissioners, duly adopted and entered upon its minutes properly describing such lands and setting forth the public use to which the same are or will be devoted; and WHEREAS, upon receipt of a certified copy of such resolution, proper officials of the county and of the state are authorized, empowered, and directed to make proper entries upon the records to accomplish such cancellation and to do all things necessary to carry out the provisions of section 196.28, F.S.; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that any and all liens for taxes, delinquent or current, against the property described in O.R. Book 963, Page 474, which was recently acquired by Indian River County for right of way purposes on 129th Street, are hereby cancelled, pursuant to the authority of section 196.28, F.S. The resolution was moved for adoption by Commissioner Macht and the motion was seconded by Commissioner Adams and, upon being put to a vote, the vote was as follows: Chairman Richard N. Bird Absent Vice Chairman John W. Tippin Ay Commissioner Carolyn K. Eggert ye Commissioner Fran B. Adams Aye Commissioner Kenneth R. Macht Aye The Chairman thereupon declared the resolution duly passed and adopted this 9 day of March , 1993. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Attest INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA .--�1010 Meez � 7., Richard T Richard N. Bird Jeffrey K. Barton,, Clerk /! Chairman Attachment: Copy of Executed Deed 15 MAR — 91993 EOOK F,a11 4 Re: 66th Avenue R/W RESOLUTION NO. 93- 49 BOOK 88 Fka-10 A RESOLUTION OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, CANCELLING CERTAIN DELINQUENT TAXES UPON PUBLICLY -OWNED LANDS, PUR- SUANT TO SECTION 196.289 FLORIDA STATUTES. WHEREAS, section 196.28, Florida Statutes, allows the Board of County Commissioners of each County to cancel and discharge any and all liens for taxes, delinquent or current, held or owned by the county or the state, upon lands heretofore or hereafter conveyed to or acquired by any agency, governmental subdivision, or municipality of the state, or the United States, for road purposes, defense purposes, recreation, reforestation, or other public use; and WHEREAS, such cancellation must be by resolution of the Board of County Commissioners, duly adopted and entered upon its minutes properly describing such lands and setting forth the public use to which the same are or will be devoted; and WHEREAS, upon receipt of a certified copy of such resolution, proper Officials of the county and of the state are authorized, empowered, and directed to make proper entries upon the records to accomplish such cancellation and to do all things necessary to carry out the provisions of section 196.28, F . S . ; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that any and all liens for taxes, delinquent or current, against the property described in O.R. Book 962, Page 210, which was recently acquired by Indian River County for right of way purposes on 66th Avenue, are hereby cancelled, pursuant to the authority of section 196.28, F.S. The resolution was moved for adoption by Commissioner Macht , and the motion was seconded by Commissioner Adams and, upon being put to a vote, the vote was as follows: Chairman Richard N. Bird Absent Vice Chairman John W. Tippin Aye Commissioner Carolyn K. Eggert Aye Commissioner Fran B. Adams Aye Commissioner Kenneth R. Macht Aye The Chairman thereupon declared the resolution duly passed and adopted this 9 day of March , 1993. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Attest: INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA By Jeffrey K..Bartonr Richard N. Bird '.� Chairman Attachment: Copy of Executed Deed 16 M M M _-1 Re: 129th Street M RESOLUTION NO. 93-_.U_ 7-7 A RESOLUTION OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, CANCELLING CERTAIN DELINQUENT TAXES UPON PUBLICLY -OWNED LANDS, PUR- SUANT TO SECTION 198.28, FLORIDA STATUTES. WHEREAS, section 196.28, Florida Statutes, allows the Board of County Commissioners of each County to cancel and discharge any and all liens for taxes, delinquent or current, held or owned by the county or the state, upon lands heretofore or hereafter conveyed to or acquired by any agency, governmental subdivision, or municipality of the state, or the United States, for road purposes, defense purposes, recreation, reforestation, or other public use; and WHEREAS, such cancellation must be by resolution of the Board of County Commissioners, duly adopted and entered upon its minutes properly describing such lands and setting forth the public use to which the same are or will be devoted; and WHEREAS, upon receipt of a certified copy of such resolution, proper officials of the county and of the state are authorized, empowered, and directed to make proper entries upon the records to accomplish such cancellation and to do all things necessary to carry out the provisions of section 196.28 , F . S . ; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that any and all liens for taxes, delinquent or current, against the property described in O.R. Book 963, Page 476, which was recently acquired by Indian River County for right of way purposes on 129th Street, are hereby cancelled, pursuant to the authority of section 196.28, F.S. The resolution was moved for adoption by Commissioner Macht and the motion was seconded by Commissioner Arlamc , and, upon being put to a vote, the vote was as follows: Chairman Richard N. Bird Absent Vice Chairman John W. Tippin Aye Commissioner Carolyn K. Eggert Aye Commissioner Fran B. Adams Aye Commissioner Kenneth R. Macht Aye The Chairman thereupon declared the resolution duly passed and adopted this 9 day of March , 1993. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Attest INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA By _00e 17 'e Ri rd N. Bird Jeffr y K . rton, Clerk % Chairman Attachment: Copy of Executed Deed 17 Boa 88 F•,tiGF1022 J Re: 129th Street RESOLUTION NO. 93- 51 ROOK 88 NAGF. .023 7 A RESOLUTION OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, CANCELLING CERTAIN DELINQUENT TAXES UPON PUBLICLY -OWNED LANDS, PUR- SUANT TO SECTION 198.289 FLORIDA STATUTES. WHEREAS, section 196.28, Florida Statutes, allows the Board of County Commissioners of each County to cancel and discharge any and all liens for taxes, delinquent or current, held or owned by the county or the state, upon lands heretofore or hereafter conveyed to or acquired by any agency, governmental subdivision, or municipality of the state, or the United States, for road purposes, defense purposes, recreation, reforestation, or other public use; and WHEREAS, such cancellation must be by resolution of the Board of County Commissioners, duly adopted and entered upon its minutes properly describing such lands and setting forth the public use to which the same are or will be devoted; and WHEREAS, upon receipt of a certified copy of such resolution, proper Officials of the county and of the state are authorized, empowered, and directed to make proper entries upon the records to accomplish such cancellation and to do all things necessary to carry out the provisions of section 196.28, F.S.; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that any and all liens for taxes, delinquent or current, against the property described in O.R. Book 963, Page 4789 which was recently acquired by Indian River County for right of way purposes on 129th Street, are hereby cancelled, pursuant to the authority of section 196.28, F.S. The resolution was moved for adoption by Commissioner Macht , and the motion was seconded by Commissioner Adams , and, upon being put to a vote, the vote was as follows: Chairman Richard N. Bird Absent Vice Chairman John W. Tippin Aye Commissioner Carolyn K. Eggert Aye Commissioner Fran B. Adams Aye Commissioner Kenneth R. Macht Aye The Chairman thereupon declared the resolution duly passed and adopted this 9 day of March 1993. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Attest INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA i By Richard N. Bird Jeffrey K. Barton, Cjerk Chairman Attachment: Copy of Executed Deed 18 Re: 129th Street RESOLUTION NO. 93- 52 A RESOLUTION OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, CANCELLING CERTAIN DELINQUENT TAXES UPON PUBLICLY -OWNED LANDS, PUR- SUANT TO SECTION 196.289 FLORIDA STATUTES. WHEREAS, section 196.28, Florida Statutes, allows the Board of County Commissioners of each County to cancel and discharge any and all liens for taxes, delinquent or current, held or owned by the county or the state, upon lands heretofore or hereafter conveyed to or acquired by any agency, governmental subdivision, or municipality of the state, or the United States, for road purposes, defense purposes, recreation, reforestation, or other public use; and WHEREAS, such cancellation must be by resolution of the Board of County Commissioners, duly adopted and entered upon its minutes properly describing such lands and setting forth the public use to which the same are or will be devoted; and WHEREAS, upon receipt of a certified copy of such resolution, proper officials of the county and of the state are authorized, empowered, and directed to make proper entries upon the records to accomplish such cancellation and to do all things necessary to carry out the provisions of section 196.28, F . S . ; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that any and all liens for taxes, delinquent or current, against the property described in O.R. Book 963, Page 480, which was recently acquired by Indian River County for right of way purposes on 129th Street, are hereby cancelled, pursuant to the authority of section 196.28, F.S. The resolution was moved for adoption by Commissioner Macht , and the motion was seconded by Commissioner Adams and, upon being put to a vote, the vote was as follows: Chairman Richard N. Bird Absent Vice Chairman John W. Tippin Aye Commissioner Carolyn K. Eggert Aye Commissioner Fran B. Adams Aye Commissioner Kenneth R. Macht Aye The Chairman thereupon declared the resolution duly passed and adopted this 9 day of March , 1993. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Attest INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA By Richard N. Bird Jeffrey K. Barton, Clerk. / Chairman Attachment: Copy of Executed Deed 19 BAR ®9 1993 BOOK 88 PAGUEAZ y MAR BOOK 88 Du102 5 7 RESOLUTION NO. 93-_U_ A RESOLUTION OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, CANCELLING CERTAIN DELINQUENT TAXES UPON PUBLICLY -OWNED LANDS, PUR- SUANT TO SECTION 196.289 FLORIDA STATUTES. WHEREAS, section 196.28, Florida Statutes, allows the Board of County Commissioners of each County to cancel and discharge any and all liens for taxes, delinquent or current, held or owned by the county or the state, upon lands heretofore or hereafter conveyed to or acquired by any agency, governmental subdivision, or municipality of the state, or the United States, for road purposes, defense purposes, recreation, reforestation, or other public use; and WHEREAS, such cancellation must be by resolution of the Board of County Commissioners, duly adopted and entered upon its minutes properly describing such lands and setting forth the public use to which the same are or will be devoted; and WHEREAS, upon receipt of a certified copy of such resolution, proper officials of the county and of the state are authorized, empowered, and directed to make proper entries upon the records to accomplish such cancellation and to do all things necessary to carry out the provisions of section 196.28, F.S. ; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COY IISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that any and all liens for taxes, delinquent or current, against the property described in O.R. Book 963, Page 482, which was recently acquired by Indian River County for right of way purposes on 129th Street, are hereby cancelled, pursuant to the authority of section 196.28, F.S. The resolution was moved for adoption by Commissioner Macht and the motion was seconded by Commissioner Adams and , .upon being Put to a vote, the vote was as follows : Chairman Richard N*Bird Absent Vice Chairman John W. Tippin Aye Commissioner Carolyn K. Eggert Aye Commissioner Fran B. Adams Aye Commissioner Kenneth R. Macht Aye The Chairman thereupon declared the resolution duly passed and adopted this _ 9 day of March , 1993. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Attest INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA By Richard N. Bird Jeffrey K. arton, Clerk. Chairman Attachment: Copy of Executed Deed 20 Re: 129th Street RESOLUTION NO. 93- 54 A RESOLUTION OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, CANCELLING CERTAIN DELINQUENT TAXES UPON PUBLICLY -OWNED LANDS, PUR- SUANT TO SECTION 196.289 FLORIDA STATUTES. WHEREAS, section 196.28, Florida Statutes, allows the Board of County Commissioners of each County to cancel and discharge any and all liens for taxes, delinquent or current, held or owned by the county or the state, upon lands heretofore or hereafter conveyed to or acquired by any agency, governmental subdivision, or municipality of the state, or the United States, for road purposes, defense purposes, recreation, reforestation, or other public use; and WHEREAS, such cancellation must be by resolution of the Board of County Commissioners, duly adopted and entered upon its minutes properly describing such lands and setting forth the public use to which the same are or will be devoted; and WHEREAS, upon receipt of a certified copy of such resolution, proper officials of the county and of the state are authorized, empowered, and directed to make proper entries upon the records to accomplish such cancellation and to do all things necessary to carry out the provisions of section 196.28, F.S.; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY. THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that any and all liens for taxes, delinquent or current, against the property described in O.R. Book 963, Page 484, which was recently acquired by Indian River County for right of way purposes on 129th Street, are hereby cancelled, pursuant to the authority of section 196.28, F.S. The resolution was moved for adoption by Commissioner Macht , and the motion was seconded by Commissioner Adams , and, upon being put to a vote, the vote was as follows: Chairman Richard N. Bird Absent Vice Chairman John W. Tippin Aye Commissioner Carolyn K. Eggert Aye Commissioner Fran B. Adams Aye Commissioner Kenneth R. Macht Aye The Chairman thereupon declared the resolution duly passed and adopted this 9 day of March , 1993. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA Attest: B L - y Ric rd N. Bird Jeffrey K./)Barton, C erk Chairman y Attachment: Copy of Executed Deed 21 MA - 91993 BOOK 88 PACH MAR - 91993 Boos 88 Parc 102 7' RESOLUTION NO. 93- 55 A RESOLUTION OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, CANCELLING CERTAIN DELINQUENT TAXES UPON PUBLICLY -OWNED LANDS, PUR- SUANT TO SECTION 196.289 FLORIDA STATUTES. WHEREAS, section 196.28, Florida Statutes, allows the Board of County Commissioners of each County to cancel and discharge any and all liens for taxes, delinquent or current, held or owned by the county or the state, upon lands heretofore or hereafter conveyed to or acquired by any agency, governmental subdivision, or municipality of the state, or the United States, for road purposes, defense purposes, recreation, reforestation, or other public use; and WHEREAS, such cancellation must be by resolution of the Board of County Commissioners, duly adopted and entered upon its minutes properly describing such lands and setting forth the public use to which the same are or will be devoted; and WHEREAS, upon receipt of a certified copy of such resolution, proper officials of the county and of the state are authorized, empowered, and directed to make proper entries upon the records to accomplish such cancellation and to do all things necessary to carry out the provisions of section 196.28 , F . S . ; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that any and all liens for taxes, delinquent or current, against the property described in O.R. Book 963, Page 488, which was recently acquired by Indian River County for right of way purposes on 129th Street, are hereby cancelled, pursuant to the authority of section 196.28, F.S. The resolution was moved for adoption by Commissioner Macht and the motion was seconded by Commissioner Adams and, upon being put to a vote, the vote was as follows: Chairman Richard N. Bird Absent Vice Chairman John W. Tippin Aye Commissioner Carolyn K. Eggert Aye Commissioner Fran B. Adams Aye Commissioner Kenneth R. Macht Aye The Chairman thereupon declared the resolution duly passed and adopted this 9 day of March , 1993. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS test: INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA By C �� Ric rd N . Bird Jeffrey K. B rton, Cle /i Chairman Attachment: Copy of Executed Deed `xa SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL DISTRICT MEETING Vice Chairman Tippin announced that the Board of County Commissioners will now adjourn to reconvene as the Board of Commissioners of the Solid Waste Disposal District. Those Minutes are being prepared separately. The Board of County Commissioners adjourned at 9:10 o'clock A.M. to sit as the Board of Commissioners of the Solid Waste Disposal District. The Board of County Commissioners reconvened the Regular Meeting of March 9, 1993, at 9:40 o'clock A.M. with the same members present, Chairman Bird not having arrived yet. PUBLIC HEARING — 34TH AVENUE/PINEWOOD ESTATES WATER SERVICE — RESOLUTION III, CONFIRMING ASSESSMENT ROLL The hour of 9:05 o'clock A.M. having passed, the County Attorney advised that this public hearing was held last week as a result of a mailing to individual property owners, and the public hearing today will be held as a result of the following newspaper ad: VERO BEACH PRESS -JOURNAL Published Daily Vero Beach, Indian River County, Florida COUNTY OF INDIAN RIVER: STATE OF FLORIDA Before the undersigned authority personally appeared J. J. Schumann, Jr. who on oath says that he is Business Manager of the Vero Beach Press Journal, a daily newspaper published at Vero Beach in Indian River County Florida; that the attached copy of advertisement, being a ` in the matter of%�� In the Court. was pub. fished in said newspaper in the issues of'Kt✓rtt s Affiant further says that the said Vero Beach Press -Journal is a newspaper published at _ Vero Beach, in said Indian River County, Florida, and that the said newspaper has heretofore been continuously published in said Indian River County, Florida, each daily and has been entered as second class mail matter at the post office in Vero Beach, in said Indian River be Coun- ty, Florida, for a period of one year next preceding the first publication of the attached copy of advertisement; and affiant further says that he has neither paid nor promised any person, firm or corporation any discount, rebate, commission or refund for the purpose Of securing this advertisement for publication in the sand newspaper. Sworn to and subscribed before me this day oL_.'L�r[,,r•,>iHi (Bustness Manager) ' 9 e) (SEAL) (Clerk of the Circuit Court, ndian er County, Florida) ��amium ,rima iT bons Jog I "sa Jog=I'. 9YJ 23 1 KKIC HEARING - PINEWOOD ESTATES WATER ASSESSMENT PROJECT The Board of Colmty Corntnissio ers of bddimh rCounty, Florida hereby Provides notice of PUBLIC - Marc G a 1993, t for 9:05 A.M. an Tuesday -March 9, 1993, to dsdalss a �op� resd ah March to a SPECIAL ASSESSMENT PROJECT in Prd an Rim County for the instaBatbn of WATER SERVICE FOR PINEWOOD ESTATES (34TH AVENUE), and Providing for spew mew m nt sIens dSo be made of record on the properties �who may to appeal any decision which tfrat a verbatim teoQd e made at this rn itt w8 need to ensure Pransedirngs is made, the appeal is based. tesbrrnonhy and evidence upon which Anyone who needs a sped accommodation for thismay contact the County's Americans with Act (ADA) Coordnitm at 587 - WW. Ext 408, at least 48 hags in advance of the Feb. 19. 19, 1M 974288 BOOK 88 PAGE. J® BOOK 88 c,A6E 10297 The Board reviewed the following memo dated 2/18/93: DATE: FEBRUARY 18, 1993 TO: JAMES E. CHANDLER COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR FROM: TERRANCE G. PINTO DIRECTOR OF UTILITY SERVICES PREPARED JAMES D. CHAST AND STAFFED MANAGER OF ASS PROJECTS BY: DEPARTMENT OF UTILITY SERVICES SUBJECT: 34TH AVMM/PINEWOOD ESTATES MMM SERVICE INDIAN RIVER COUNTY PROJECT NO. UW -92 -25 -DS RESOLUTION III - PUBLIC HEARING BACKGROUND On February. 9, 1993, the Indian River County Board of County Commissioners approved Resolution I (93-31) and Resolution II (93-32). Resolution I contained the preliminary assessment roll describing the project and cost. Resolution II set the date of the public hearing for the subject project. Property owners have been notified of the public hearing by certified mail. Resolution I (93-31) was published in the Vero Beach PRESS JOURNAL on February 15, 1993 (see attached agenda item and minutes of the above meeting). Design of the water distribution system is complete. An informational meeting was held with the property owners on February 16, 1993. The total estimated cost to be assessed is $32,236.00. The cost per square foot is $0.090496. One of the lots in this subdivision on 8th Street is already on County water and was originally included in the 12th Street Assessment Project. Approval of the attached Resolution III will confirm and approve the preliminary assessment. Additionally, utilizing the 10 -foot rear lot line utility easements in accordance with the subdivision regulations as stated in the subdivision plat requires maintenance of said easements be accepted by the Board of County Commissioners. The attached map displays the area to benefit from the assessment Project- This project is to be paid through the assessment of interim, finaancinglwill b the throughsed the usewater of line route. In the impact fee funds. RECOMMezTION The staff of the Department of Utility Services recommends that the Board of County Commissioners approve Resolution III, which affirms the preliminary assessment on the subject project and also that the County accept the maintenance of the 10 -foot rear lot line easements, where the water lines will be installed. 24 The Vice Chairman reopened the Public Hearing and asked if anyone wished to be heard in this matter. There being none, he closed the Public Hearing. Attorney Vitunac advised that the Board must ratify the Motion made last week to adopt a Resolution confirming the assessments in connection with a water main extension in Pinewood Estates. ON MOTION by Commissioner Macht, SECONDED by Commissioner Adams, the Board unanimously (4-0, Commissioner Bird being delayed) ratified their vote of March 2, 1993, and adopted Resolution 93-56, confirming the special assessments in connection with a water main extension to Pinewood Estates (34th Ave.) and providing for special assessment liens to be made of record. required by Section 206.04, Indian River County Code; and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County passed Resolution No. 93-32, on February 9, 1993, which net a time and place for the owners of the properties to be assessed and other interested persons to have the chance to be heard as to any and all complaints as to said project and said special assessments; and WHEREAS, a public hearing was advertised for Tuesday, March 9, 1993, for the Board to act as required by Section 206.07, Indian River County Code; and Nei MAR ® 91993 BCGK O 4: E U O RECORD VERIFIED Public Bearing (Third Rego.) JEFFREY K. BARTON ' CLERK CIRCUIT COURT RESOLUTION NO. 93-56 INDIAN RIVER CO.. FLA A RESOLUTION OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, CONFIRMING .4 THE SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS IN CONNECTION WITH A WATER MAIN -J EXTENSION TO PINEWOOD ESTATES (34TH AVENUE), AND PROVIDING FOR SPECIAL ASSESSMENT LIENS TO BE MADE OF m N �� -RECORD. lD pyo► N v pp M' a C « WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County .4 has, by Resolution No. 93-31, adopted February 9, 1993, determined to �•� N make special assessments against certain properties to be serviced by a •°� ei ,� ry water. main extension of the County to Pinewood Estates (34th Avenue); �A , uand WHEREAS, said resolution described the manner in which said special v assessments shall be made and how said special assessments are to be _. ci paid; and WHEREAS, the resolution was published on February 15, 1993, as required by Section 206.04, Indian River County Code; and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County passed Resolution No. 93-32, on February 9, 1993, which net a time and place for the owners of the properties to be assessed and other interested persons to have the chance to be heard as to any and all complaints as to said project and said special assessments; and WHEREAS, a public hearing was advertised for Tuesday, March 9, 1993, for the Board to act as required by Section 206.07, Indian River County Code; and Nei MAR ® 91993 BCGK O 4: E U O BOOK 88 �"GF 103 " MAR m 9 1993 RESOLUTION NO. 93--5,6- WHEREAS, notice of the time and place of the public hearing was published in the Press Journal Newspaper on Friday., February 12, 1993, and Friday, February 19, 1993 (twice one week apart; the last being at least one week prior to the hearing), as required by Section 206.06, Indian River County Code; and WHEREAS, the land owners of record were mailed notices at least ten days prior to the first hearing, as required by Section 206.06, Indian River County Code; and -. o� WHEREAS, the property owners were able to be heard twice with =: Q 1 %D respect to the referenced project; i.e., once at the Board of County Gt . CT Commissioners' Tuesday, March 2, 1993, meeting and once again at the -� c� C:) advertised public hearing on Tuesday, March 9, 1993, OO Ul NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, as follows: 1. The .special assessments shown on the attached assessment roll are hereby confirmed and approved, and shall remain legal, valid, and binding first liens against the properties assessed until paid in full. 2. The County will record the special assessments and this resolution, which describes the properties assessed and the amounts of the special assessments, on the public records, which shall constitute prima facie evidence of the validity of the special assessments. The re*olution was moved for adoption by commissioner Marht and the motion was seconded by Commissioner FaaP_rt . and, upon being put to a vote, the vote was as follows: Chairman Richard N. Bird Absent Vice Chairman John W. Tippin Aye Commissioner Carolyn. R. Eggert Aye Commissioner Fran B. Adams Aye Commissioner Kenneth R. Macht Aye The Chairman thereupon declared the resolution duly passed and adopted this 9th day of March, 1993. 2. jr i •s, e.fftoj►' iC. 'B rtoii,; BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS INDIAN R�I'V�E�COUN�TY, FLORIDA By r- } Richard N. Bird er}}c� Chairman 26 Chairman Bird entered the meeting at 9:45 o'clock A.M. having been delayed due to making a presentation at Citrus Elementary School. PUBLIC HEARING - ORDINANCE ADDING A NEW CHAPTER 202, COUNTY RECLAIMED WATER The hour of 9:05 o'clock A.M. having passed, the County Attorney announced that this Public Hearing has been properly advertised, as follows: VERO BEACH PRESS -JOURNAL Published Daily Vero Beach, Indian River County, Florida COUNTY OF INDIAN RIVER: STATE OF FLORIDA Before the undersigned authority personally appeared J. J. Schumann, Jr. who on oath says that he is Business Manager of the Vero Beach Press -Journal, a daily newspaper published at Vero Beach in Indian River County, Florida; that the attached copy of advertisement, being a in the matter of 1�/moi in the Court, was pub- lished in said newspaper in the issues of .�% ,if 11517lA-ff Affiant further says that the said Vero Beach Press -Journal is a newspaper published at Vero Beach, in said Indian River County, Florida, and that the said newspaper has heretofore been continuously published in said Indian River County, Florida, each daily and has been entered as second class mail matter at the post office in Vero Beach, in said Indian River Coun- ty, Florida, fora period of one year next preceding the first publication of the attached copy of advertisement; and affiant further says that he has neither paid nor promised any person, firm or corporation any discount, rebate, commission or refund for the purpose of securing this advertisement for publication in the said newspaper. 011 Sworn to and subscribed before T1 this dayof L� 60 D. 19 . F (Business Manager) (SEAL) horrY Pubk, 5totc of Fu,rlt a My cminkm rr &.*a J&= -P. 1P93 27 The Board of PUBW NOTICE R� C_ � rice Ia a' hereby for 9:05 I A.M. on TUESDAY - MARCH 9. 1993. to dl== and oon- sille, ad ` A OR IN SCE dbw'IND R_1VERR COUNTY, FLORIDA, ADDING A NEW CHAPTER 202 EN -M I TLED COUNTY RECLAIMED WATER TO THE INDIAN RIM COW ��FLORID& PROVIDING OF SI FOR REPEAL OF CON. FLICTNG PROVISIONS, CODIFICATION, SEVER- ABILITY, AND EFFECTIVE DATE � pa Wine is to appeal XV dedebn v&kh U�at ensure a verbatan record nol the tjr will eo" is nude, *hch -Was need to �PeY and eMdenoe Won whhch al is based. 0 who needs a spedal ecconnradatbn for whh�Amertans Iti� AG DA)) Co�the �ato (Aat 567. 8000, EXL 408, at least 48 hags in advance of the Feb. 13, 1M 974281 MAR ® 9 199 BOOK I,+��r .0 ,2 _I BOOK 1033 The Board reviewed the following memo dated 2/23/93: DATE: FEBRUARY 231 1993 TO: JAMES E. CHANDLER COUNTY ADMINISTRAT FROM: TERRANCE G. PINT DIRECTOR OF UTI SERVICES STAFFED AND PREPARED BY: ROBERT 0. WISEMEN, P.E. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEER DEPARTMENT OF UTILITY SERVICES SUBJECT: PUBLIC HEARING - RECLAIMED WATER ORDINANCE PROPOSED INDIAN RIVER COUNTY ORDINANCE, CHAPTER 202 On February 9, 1993, the Board of County Commissioners consented to setting March 9, 1993, as the date of the public hearing in regard to the proposed Reclaimed Water Ordinance (see attached agenda item) . ANALYSIS: On February 13, 1993, the Press -Journal advertised the public hearing to discuss and consider adopting the proposed ordinance, Chapter 202. RECOMMENDATION: The Department of Utility Services recommends that the Board of County Commissioners approve and adopt the proposed Reclaimed Water Ordinance, Indian River County Ordinance, Chapter 202. The Chairman opened the Public Hearing and asked if anyone wished to be heard in this matter. There being none, he closed the Public Hearing. ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by Commissioner Tippin, the Board unanimously adopted Ordinance 93-6, adding a new Chapter 202 entitled County Reclaimed Water to the Code of Ordinances of Indian River County, Florida. 28 ORDINANCE NO 93- JL AN ORDINANCE OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, ADDING A NEW CHAPTER 202 ENTITLED COUNTY RECLAIMED WATER TO THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, PROVIDING FOR REPEAL OF CONFLICTING PROVISIONS, CODIFICATION, SEVERABILITY AND EFFECTIVE DATE. Be it ordained by the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County that: SECTION 202.01 SSORT TITLE This chapter may be known as the Reclaimed Water Ordinance. SECTION 202.02 PURPOSE AND INTENT The purpose of this chapter is to provide for the implementation of the land development related policies of the Sanitary Sewer and Potable Water Sub -Elements of the Comprehensive Plan. The requirements of this chapter are intended to implement criteria established by Florida Administrative Code Chapter 17-610 for the design, operation and maintenance of a reclaimed water land application system. SECTION 202.03 DEFINITIONS ACCESSIBLE, RECLAIMED WATER SERVICE TO EXISTING DEVELOPMENT Shall mean reclaimed water service within one hundred (100) feet from the nearest point of the existing development to a primary transmission main or sub -area distribution main of the Indian River County Reclaimed Water Distribution System as measured through public easements or public right-of-ways. ACCESSIBLE, RECLAIMED WATER SERVICE TO NEW DEVELOPMENT - Shall mean reclaimed water service within one quarter mile from the nearest point of the project site to a primary transmission main or sub -area distribution main of the Indian River County Reclaimed Water Distribution System as measured through public easements or public,right-of-way. ADEQUATE SIZE - Shall mean a reclaimed water system designed to apply, at a minimum, 1,000 gallons per day of reclaimed water per equivalent residential unit of potable water or sanitary sewer service calculated to serve the facility or use. AVAILABLE Shall mean the presence of reclaimed water within the transmission and distribution network at pressures adequate to operate standard irrigation systems and devices. CROSS CONNECTION - Shall mean any physical connection or arrangement which could allow the inter -mingling of waters between the public potable water supply and distribution system, or a private potable water supply and the county's reclaimed water supply or distribution system or any other non -potable water source. IRRIGATION SYSTEM - Shall mean the user's in -ground piped system which delivers water to a spray or drip -type irrigation devices located throughout the property. The system may be controlled by an electric timer or manually. The system may be equipped with special hose bib boxes providing for irrigation by hose and or portable sprinkler devices in lieu of an in -ground piping system IRRIGATION WELL - Shall mean a well located on private property with no means of supplying water for human consumption, used to supply water to an in -ground irrigation system or other irrigation devices which serve the property. NON -POTABLE WATER SUPPLY - Shall mean a well used as a source of water for other than human consumption, such as irrigation, cooling, or other used. POTABLE WATER SUPPLY WELL - Shall mean a well used as a source of water for drinking, culinary or domestic purposes. FV MAR - 91993 Boos 88 ucF 1034 MAR - 91,993 BOCK 88 F'Gr Ion RECLAIMED WATER - Shall mean water that has received at least secondary treatment and is reused after flowing out of a wastewater treatment facility. RECLAIMED WATER SYSTEM - Shall mean the Indian River County Reclaimed Water Distribution System, including but not limited to: primary transmissions lines, sub -area distribution mains, pumping equipment, storage tanks, shut-off valves, meters and backflow prevention devices. SERVICE AREA - Shall mean that area defined in the Infrastructure Element of the Indian River County comprehensive plan as the Reclaimed Water System service area. SECTION 202.04 CUSTOMER CLASSIFICATIONS For the purpose of determining connection criteria, and applicable rate schedules the following customer classifications are established: User/Land Use Rate Classification Detached Single Family Residential Unit Class S Multi -Family Residential Developments Class M Commercial Uses Class C High Volume Users Class V Agricultural Users Class A SECTION 202.05 RECLAIMED WATER SYSTEM USER RATES A rate shall be charged to the customers of the reclaimed water system. Those charges will be made on a monthly basis, and are subject to change by the Board of County Commissioners from time to time. SECTION 202.06 PROHIBITED USES OF RECLAIMED WATER (1) Reclaimed water shall not be used for filling swimming pools, hot tubs, wading pools or for any other use not expressly permitted by the Florida Department of Environmental Regulation. Reclaimed water shall not enter a dwelling unit or building containing a residential unit except as permitted by Florida Administrative Code 17-610.476 and 17-610.477. (2) Land application of reclaimed water is prohibited within 75 feet of any potable water source. SECTION 202.07 CLASS S CONNECTIOTN CRITERIA (1) The customer's on-site system may be either a standard in -ground landscape irrigation system or a specially designed in -ground hose bib box containing one or two hose bibs to be used to irrigate the property by means of garden hoses and portable sprinklers. The in -ground system may be controlled either by manually operated zone valves or automatically by a timer and related zone valve. If the customer elects to use the in -ground hose bib box, it will be supplied at cost by the county for installation by the customer. The box shall be installed within 10 feet of the street frontage property line and will be equipped with a special wrench -type locking device to provide the customer the ability to control the use of reclaimed water on the property. The lid of the hose bib box will be clearly marked "IRRIGATION - RECLAIMED WATER." (2) There shall be no physical connection between any non -potable water supply, including but not limited to the county's reclaimed water system, and the consumer's potable water system. SECTION 202.08 CLASS M AND CLASS C CONNECTION CRITERIA (1) The customer's on-site system shall be a standard in -ground landscape irrigation system. The system shall be zoned and shall be controlled by a timer. Signs as approved by the county shall be placed in conspicuous locations within the landscaped area of the development. Signs shall read "IRRIGATION WITH RECLAIMED WATER - DO NOT DRINK." Oro] (2) If vehicles or boats are to be washed on the property, a special area shall be set aside for the specific purpose and it shall be served by one or more in -ground hose bib boxes connected to the on-site reclaimed water system. The hose bib shall be equipped with a special wrench -type locking devise to provide the customer the capability to control the use of reclaimed water. The hose bib shall be clearly marked and readily visible with at least one sign stating "AUTO WASHING - RECLAIMED WATER - DO NOT DRINX." SECTION 202.09 CLASS V USER CONNECTION CRITERIA Connection criteria for high volume use of reclaimed water shall be determined on an individual basis by the Utility Services Department. All uses and connections shall be in conformance with applicable Florida Department of Regulation criteria. SECTION 202.10 CLASS A USER CONNECTION CRITERIA (1) Agricultural application of reclaimed water is strictly regulated by the Florida Department of Regulation. Applications for connection will be reviewed on a case by case basis by the Indian River County Utility Services Department to determine the appropriate application method and any restrictions that may apply. SECTION 202.11 PUBLIC EASEMENT REQUIREMENT No facilities will be installed under the provisions of this chapter and accepted by the county for maintenance unless constructed within a public right-of-way or dedicated easement. SECTION 202.12 APPLICATION FOR EXTENSION OR CONNECTION TO TBE RECLAIMED WATER SYSTEM Applications for improvements or connection to the system shall be submitted to the Director of the Utility Services Department. Applications for reclaimed water service associated with development requiring a Utility Construction Permit shall be submitted concurrently with the potable water and or sanitary sewer permit applications. SECTION 202.13 APPLICATIONS FOR RECLAIMED WATER SERVICE CLASS M AND CLASS C (1) Applications for reclaimed water service to Class M or Class B customers, - including public, commercial, office, industrial or multi -family developments, shall be accompanied by a detailed site plan showing the size and location of the service connection to the distribution main, the layout of the primary delivery mains within the development and the location and type of irrigation devices to be installed in the irrigation system. The maximum steady-state demand for reclaimed water that the irrigation system will require to function properly must also be provided. (2) The irrigation system shall be a standard in -ground type with permanently placed sprinkler devices. The service connection shall be equipped with a shut-off valve on the customer side of the meter. The size of the service connection and meter will be determined by the Utility Services Department based upon the maximum steady-state demand of the irrigation system. (3) Signs approved by the department shall be posted through the development stating that reclaimed water is in use. SECTION 202.14 APPLICATION FOR RECLAIMED WATER SERVICE CLASS S (1) The application shall identify the type of irrigation system which will be used. (2) A single residential service connection will consist of a corporation stop at the distribution main, the service pipe and a curb stop and box at the property line. A single reclaimed water service connection will be one inch in diameter. A double service connection, one serving two residential lots, will be one and one-half inches in diameter. No meter will be required. 31 R - 91993 �ooK 88 FnE 103 6 (3) I BOOK 88 PAcF 103 Immediately inside the property line, the customer shall install a county approved shut-off valve for use in repairing, extending and 'maintaining the on-site system. SECTION 202.15 - SERVICE CONNECTIONS (1) Property service connections shall be as required by the property served, but in no case shall be less than one inch in diameter. (2) Each service connection shall be equipped with a corporation stop or shut-off valve at the main and a lockable curb stop or shut-off valve and box at the property line. The county's valve box cover at the property line shall be square and marked "RECLAIMED WATER". This service connection together with its valves are the property of Indian River County. (3) The customer is responsible for the installation of a private shut-off valve inside his property line for his own use. Two or more customers may be served by one service connection if sufficient capacity is available. Such common service lines will be sized to prov4de adequate supply to each customer. SECTION 202.16 OWNERSHIP OF SYSTEM All reclaimed water facilities, including buildings, pumping equipment, storage tanks, transmission and diiptribution mains and property service connections from the main to the property line, when constructed or accepted by the county, shall become and remain the property of the county. No person shall, by payment of any charges, or by causing any construction of facilities accepted by the county, acquire any interest or right in any of these facilities, or any portion thereof, other than the privilege of having their property connected to the reclaimed water system. SECTION 202.17 RIGHT TO REFUSE SERVICE No payment of any costs or other acts to receive reclaimed water system service shall guarantee such service. The county shall have the right at all times to refuse to extend service on the basis of a use detrimental to the system, inadequate supply of reclaimed water, lack of payment of required fees, or for any other reason which, in the judgement of the Director of the Utility Services Department, may not be in the best interest of the county. SECTION 202.18 SYSTEN IDENTIFICATION All reclaimed water valves and outlets shall be labelled or tagged to warn the public that reclaimed water is not intended for human consumption. All pipes, service tubing and above ground facilities accepted into the system shall be permanently identified by adhesive backed colored tape so as to obviously indicate pipe use. There shall be a minimum of three colored stripes per length of pipe; each a minimum of 2 inches wide. The identifying colors shall be: SECTION 202.19 Reclaimed Water: Purple Potable Water: Blue CROSS -CONNECTION CONTROL Where reclaimed water service is provided, the public potable water supply shall be protected by an approved, back flow prevention device. All devices and materials installed for cross -connection control must be approved by the Utility Services Department. Where there is reclaimed water service, or other auxiliary water supply, there shall be no physical connection between such non -potable supply and the consumer's potable water system. Connection to reclaimed water service shall be completed under the supervision of a Florida Registered Professional Engineer that shall certify that the connection has been completed under the Engineer's supervision in conformance with the standards of the Utility Services Department and in accordance with F.A.C. rule 17-610. 32 SECTION 202.20 MINIMUM SEPARATION BETWEEN PUBLIC UTILITIES (1) Sanitary Sewer Mains A maximum obtainable separation of public access reclaimed water mains and sanitary sewer mains shall be maintained. A minimum horizontal separation of 5 feet (center to center) or 3 feet (outside to outside) shall be maintained between reclaimed water mains and sewage mains. Where reclaimed water and sanitary sewer mains cross with less than 18 inches vertical clearance, the sanitary sewage main shall be 20 feet of either ductile iron pipe, concrete encased vitrified clay pipe, concrete encased PVC pipe, or encased in a watertight carrier pipe, centered on the point of crossing. (2) Potable Water Mains A maximum obtainable separation of Public Access reclaimed water mains and Potable water mains shall be maintained. A minimum horizontal separation of 5 feet (center to center) or 3 feet (outs,ide to outside) shall be maintained between reclaimed water mains and potable water mains. Where reclaimed water and sanitary sewer mains cross with less than 1S inches vertical clearance, the sanitary sewage main shall be 20 feet of either ductile iron pipe, concrete encased vitrified clay pipe, concrete encased PVC pipe, or encased in a watertight carrier pipe, centered on the point of crossing. (3) A 75 foot setback distance shall be provided from public access reclaimed transmission facility/transmission mains to any public potable water supply well. SECTION 202.21 DUAL SOURCE IRRIGATION SYSTEMS (1) Reclaimed water service may be provided to sites where a secondary source of irrigation water is necessary, however, prior to connection to the reclaimed water system, a dual connection control device shall be installed in accordance with Indian River County Utility Department Standards and criteria. (2) Where other surface water or groundwater sources are used to supplement the reclaimed water system, an air gap separation or a reduced -pressure principle backflow prevention assembly shall be provided at the well to protect the aquifer and at the surface water source to protect the surface water. SECTION 202.22 MAINTENANCE BY CUSTOMER The property owner and or customer shall be responsible for the maintenance of all plumbing facilities, including irrigation lines and appurtenances, on the property served by the county. The county reserves the right to disconnect the service to any property that does not adequately maintain the private portion of the system. SECTION 202.23 SYSTEM PRESSURES The county does not provide reclaimed water at pressures which are adequate to operate all standard irrigation systems and devices. Should the customer require reclaimed water at' different pressures or different quality, or in any way different from that normally supplied by the county, the customer shall be responsible for the necessary devices to make these adjustments subject to approval by the Utility Services Department. SECTION 202.24 SERVICE NOT GUARANTEED The source of the reclaimed water is the Indian River County Regional Wastewater Treatment System which can produce a finite quantity of reclaimed water. While the demand for reclaimed water will be monitored, the county does not guarantee delivery of service. The county reserves the right to temporarily discontinue service to any portion of, or the entire, reclaimed water system, as deemed necessary by the Utility Services Department. 33 MAR - 91993 800K �� FacF �U B MAR a � X99 BOOK 88 Pnur 103 SECTION 202.25 UNAUTSORIZED WORK ON THE RECLAIMED WATER SYSTEM No person, unless expressly authorized by the Utility Services Director, or his designee, shall tamper with, work on, or in any way alter or damage any county reclaimed water facility. Tampering or work shall include, but is not limited -to opening or closing of valves, turning on hydrants, or causing of any water to flow from the system. No unauthorized person shall cut into or make any type of connection to the system. The offending person shall be liable for the cost of all charges attributable to the correction of such tampering, including legal expenses. Correction of damage shall not relieve the offending person from the penalties hereinafter provided. SECTION 202.26 UNLAWFUL CONNECTION No person shall be allowed to connect into the reclaimed water system without the written consent of the county, and then the connection with the system shall be made only with the direct supervision of the utility department. Any. property owner, plumber or other individual who shall make any connection without such consent of the county shall, upon conviction,.be subject to the penalties hereinafter provided. SECTION 202.27 INSPECTION OF IRRIGATION SYSTEMS AND OTBFR RECLAIMED WATER FACILITIES The county reserves the right to enter private property to make inspections of the initial installation and operation of irrigation systems and other reclaimed water facilities and to make periodic inspections thereafter to verify that the systems are being properly maintained and operated in strict accordance with this chapter. SECTION 202.28 DISCONTINUANCE OF SERVICE BY INDIAN RIVER COUNTY Unless otherwise provided by law, the county may discontinue service to any customer due to a violation of these policies and regulations, non-payment of bills, failure to properly maintain the customer's system, tampering with any service or cross -connection with a potable water source. The county shall discontinue service until the condition has been corrected, all costs due the county are paid and adequate guarantees have been provided that the violation will not re -occur. Costs to be paid include delinquent billings, connections charges, equipment costs and payment for any damage caused to the system. SECTION 202.29 PENALTIES Any person, firm or corporation or anyone acting in behalf thereof who shall violate or fail to comply with any of the provisions of this article shall, upon conviction, be punished by a fine not to exceed five hundred dollars ($500). The board of county commissioners may enforce the provisions of this article by seeking injunctive relief or any other remedies provided by law. REPEAL OF CONFLICTING PROVISIONS All previous ordinances, resolutions, or motions of the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida which conflict with the provisions of this ordinance are hereby repealed to the extent of such conflict. All Special Acts of the legislature applying only to the unincorporated portion of Indian River County and which conflict with the provisions of this ordinance are hereby repealed to the extent of such conflict. CODIFICATION The provisions of this ordinance shall be incorporated into the County Code and the "Ordinance" may be changed to "section", "article", or other appropriate word, and the sections of this ordinance may be renumbered or relettered to accomplish such intentions. SEVERABILITY If any section, part of a sentence, paragraph, phrase or word of this ordinance is for any reason held to be unconstitutional, inoperative or void, such holdings shall not affect the remaining portions hereof and it 34 _ M f shall be construed to have been the legislative intent to .pass this ordinance without such unconstitutional, invalid or inoperative part. EFFECTIVE DATE The provisions of this ordinance shall become effective upon receipt from the Florida Secretary of State of official acknowledgement that this ordinance has been filed with the Department of State of the State of Florida. Approved and adopted by the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida, on this 9 day of March , 1993. This ordinance was advertised in the Vero Beach Press Journal on the 13th day of February , 1993, fora public hearing to be held Fn the 9 ay of arc , 1993, at which time it was moved for adopton by Comm se oner� ,. and the motion was seconded by Commissioner Tinnin , and, upon being put to a vote, the vote was as fol owe: Chairman Richard N. Bird Aye Vice Chairman John W. Tippin Aye Commissioner Carolyn K. Eggert Aye Commissioner Fran B. Adams Aye Commissioner Kenneth R. Macht Aye The Chairman thereupon declared the ordinance duly passed and adopted this 9th day of March , 1993. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA By Richard N. Bir Chairman Jeffrey K. arton C ezk Lr �, ACKNOWLEDGMENT by the Department of State of the State of Florida, this 17th day of Marrh , 1993. EFFECTIVE DATE: Acknowledgment for the Department of State received on this 221id day of March , 1993, at 10:00 a.m./jXM and filednthe Office of the Clerk -of the Board of County Comm-1esioners of Indian River County, Florida. OR, Indmn MW Admin. Budget utilities MM DOC MAR ® 91993 aooK 88 FAIL 0 0 L FF__ lin - 91993 FEDERAL FUNCTIONAL CLASSIFICATION BOOK 1041 The Board reviewed the following memo dated 3/2/93: TO: James Chandler County Administrator FROM: Robert M. Keating, AICP#4k, Community Development Director DATE: March 2, 1993 SUBJECT: FEDERAL FUNCTIONAL CLASSIFICATION It is requested that the information presented herein be given formal consideration by the Board of County Commissioners at their regular meeting of March 9, 1993. DESCRIPTION & CONDITIONS: Federal functional classification is an issue being addressed primarily by the Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO). The MPO, however, has jurisdiction only for .those areas within its boundaries. Since all land outside of the MPO's boundary consists of unincorporated area, the Board of County Commissioners has jurisdiction there. As per Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) requirements, MPO's must approve federal functional classifications within their jurisdictions, while applicable local governments must approve federal functional classifications outside of MPO areas. For Indian River County, that will require that the Board of County Commissioners adopt a resolution approving the proposed federal functional classification for non -MPO areas. The attached map depicts -the MPO boundary in the county. • Background At its January, 1993 meeting, the MPO'Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) considered the issue of federal functional classification. Mandated by the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), federal functional classification must occur at least every ten years. The process involves identifying every roadway in the County and classifying each roadway based upon the trip purposes served by the roadway. Once established, federal functional classification will be used as a basis for determining which'roads will be eligible for federal funding. To functionally classify the roadways in Indian River County, Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) District 4 staff met with county staff and staff members of municipalities within the county in .November, 1992. Based upon this meeting, an initial classification was assigned to each roadway in the County. Upon consideration of the draft classification at its January, 1993 meeting, the MPO TAC noted several problems with the classification. Most of these problems related to incorrect roadway designations or roadway segments omitted from the list. No problems were noted with the classification proposed for roadways. Because of the problems identified, the MPO TAC requested that TAC members provide MPO staff with comments on the proposed classification and directed staff to inform FDOT of the recommended changes. Subsequent to the TAC meeting, staff presented the issue of Federal -Functional classification as an informational item to the MPO at its January meeting. 36 Federal Functional Classification March 2, 1993 Page 2 Since the January, 1993 MPO TAC meeting, MPO staff has provided comments to FDOT regarding the proposed federal functional classification. These comments consisted of a number of recommended changes to the proposed federal functional classification identified by the City of Vero Beach staff and the Indian River County staff. FDOT has incorporated the recommended changes in a revised federal functional classification for roadways in Indian River County. These classifications for roadways identified as collector or above are reflected in the attached printout. A map graphically depicting these roadways and their classifications is also available; however, because the map is not reproducible it is not attached. At its meeting of February 26, 1993, the MPO TAC considered the revised Federal Functional classification, approved the revised classification with three changes, and recommended that the MPO adopt a resolution approving the revised classification. As modified by the TAC, the functional classification recognizes that both 41st St. and 45th St. will extend from U.S.#1 to the future extension of Indian River Blvd. The third change involved correcting the alignment of the proposed Perimeter Road on the classification map. These changes have been made by staff. While the MPO is scheduled to consider the issue of federal functional classification at its meeting of March 10, 1993, the Board of County Commissioners must now consider federal functional classification for roadways located outside of the MPO boundary and approve the classification, if acceptable. A draft resolution is attached for the Board's consideration. ALTERNATIVES & ANALYSIS: As structured, federal functional classification is a simple and straight -forward process. It involves identification of all roadways in the County and evaluation of each roadway to determine which of twelve specific trip purposes the roadway serves. These trip purposes are listed in the attached excerpt from federal functional classification rules. Based upon the number of and type of trip purposes identified, each roadway has been assigned a classification. The attached printout identifies the proposed classification as well as the trip purpose or purposes identified for each roadway classified as collector or above. Since the Board may address only that area outside of the MPO boundaries and because that area is rural in nature, there are a limited number of roads there which are classified as collector or above. Among those roadways classified as collector or above with at least some portion of the roadway located outside of the MPO area are: SR 60, I-95, CR 512, CR 507, CR 619, 66th Avenue, Blue Cypress Lake Road, and the Turnpike. In reviewing the draft federal functional classification of roads within the county, it is not appropriate to recommend that the classification of a roadway be changed. Instead, the trip purposes assigned to the roadway should be proposed for change, if appropriate. Based upon a change in trip purposes served, a roadway's classification may or may not change. It is staff's position that the attached printout represents an adequate federal functional classification of roadways within the County. With the recent changes made by FDOT, the revised classification incorporates all changes recommended by the staffs of the county and the municipalities within the County. For that reason, staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners review the proposed classification, identify any needed changes, 37 MAR - 9 1993 83 1;042. MAR 91993 e00K 88 FAGS 1043 and approve the proposed classification for those roadways located outside of the MPO's boundary. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners review the proposed federal functional classification of roadways in Indian River County and adopt the attached resolution approving the proposed federal functional classification of those roadways located outside of the MPO's boundary. METROPOLITAN (PL) AREA SREVARD MUM acl �; laau F O� clPRESS \ i • { aiysttt03= cor:.:z � Ij Scale, t/4".1 nil••_. - If j `! +ALL BOUNDARY ROADS ARE INCLUDED WITHIN THE BOUNDARIES CIE ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by Commissioner Tippin, the Board unanimously adopted Resolution 93-57, approving the Federal Functional Classification of roadways located within Indian River County, etc. 38 \T2 saaaanA P owe li 1 I' 11.,6 ST Y ,n a 7726 ST w , «. N \ IMOIAa _ ," p1V8a SHORES Italy alt 111126 .T V8110 BEACH �• •21. 9T !1 11th 11T alis ST at T 11w - •. A'v . ae11 CIE ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by Commissioner Tippin, the Board unanimously adopted Resolution 93-57, approving the Federal Functional Classification of roadways located within Indian River County, etc. 38 RESOLUTION NO. 93-57 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, APPROVING THE FEDERAL FUNCTIONAL CLASSIFICA- TION OF ROADWAYS LOCATED WITHIN INDIAN RIVER COUNTY .AND OUTSIDE OF THE METROPOLITAN (PL) BOUNDARY. OF THE VERO BEACH (INDIAN RIVER COUNTY) METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION. WHEREAS, the Federal Highway Administration requires that all roads in the State of Florida be classified according to their function; and WHEREAS, the staff of the Vero Beach/Indian River County Metropolitan Planning Organization (hereafter known as the MPO) and the staffs of local governments within the County have worked with the Florida Department of Transportation District 4 Office in Fort Lauderdale (hereafter known as FDOT) to develop the required functional classification designations; and WHEREAS, the proposed federal functional classification for all roadways in Indian River County is depicted in Attachment A; and WHEREAS, the MPO Technical Advisory Committee has reviewed the proposed functional classifications of all roadways in the County and recommended that the functional classifications be approved; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS*APPROVES ATTACHMENT A WHICH IDENTIFIES THE FUNCTIONAL CLASSIFICATION OF ROADWAYS WITHIN INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, INCLUDING THOSE ROADS LOCATED OUTSIDE OF THE METROPOLITAN (PL) BOUNDARY OF THE VERO BEACH (INDIAN RIVER COUNTY) MPO. w RESOLUTION was moved for adoption by Commissioner Eggert , and the motion was seconded by Commissioner Tiwin , and, upon being put to a vote, the vote was as follows: 39 MAR m 91993 Boa Far 104' { � I Chairman, Richard N. Bird Vice Chairman, John W. Tippin Commissioner Carolyn Eggert Commissioner Kenneth R. Macht Commissioner Fran Adams ®® I SOUK 8C) P,gUL Aye Ye Aye Aye Aye The Chairman thereupon declared the resolution duly passed and adopted this day of March , 1993. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIV R COUNTY, FLORIDA __ C�,� Richard N. Bird, Chairman A ST: J,K. aAR��ERK C 40 Indian Amer Ce Approved Dale Admin. S 4:L- 3 3 3 Legal�v _ Budget Dept. AM -Risk Mgr. 1." r�z ATTACHMENT "A" R -PA RURAL PRINCIPAL ARTERIAL U -PA URBAN PRINCIPAL ARTERIAL INDIAN RIVER COUNTY R -MA RURAL MINOR ARTERIAL U -MA URBAN MINOR ARTERIAL PROPOSED FEDERAL FUNCTIONAL CLASSIFICATION R-MAJ RURAL MAJOR COLLECTOR FEBRUARY 16,1993 U-COLL URBAN COLLECTOR - R -MIN RURAL MINOR COLLECTOR PROPOSED TRIP PURPOSE ARTERIAL COLLECTOR LOCA FED FUNC ............ nr»a 4 12 a A lz r 7 R a (11 ASS IFNr.TH LULAL IMANIC FELLSMERE ROAD KINGS HWY/58TH AVE KINGS HWY/58TH AVE OSLO ROAD SR AIA WABASSO ROAD WABASSO ROAD 102ND TERRACE 12TH STREET CR 510 49TH STREET OSLO ROAD 1-95 CR 51 O)WABASSO ROAD CR 609 us 1 CR 512 66TH AVENUE US 1/SR 5 CR 510 SW 1ST STREET 43RD AVENUE BREVARD COUNTY LINE US 1/SR 5 ISLAND DRIURBAN BNDRY NORTH .5 MILES CR 6131KINGS HWY CR 512 CR 613 CR 613 AlA CR 510 CR 510 7 6 6 7 6 7 7 1 9 1 1 101 R -MA R -MA R -MA R -MA JR -MA R -MA R -MA R-MAJ R-MAJ 3.70 4.10 1.00 3.90 6.60 3.30 1.10 0.50 0.90 4TH STREET 166TH AVENUE KINGS HIGHWAY 9 R-MAJ 0.90 43RD AVENUE I ST LUCIE COUNTY LINE 13TH ST, SW 8 IR-MAJ 1.00 53RD STREETIKINGSERRY 66TH AVENUE 65TH STREET/S WINTER BC KINGS HWY us 1 us 1 9 9 R-MAJ R-MAJ 2.80 1.50 66TH AVENUE 26TH STREET CR 510 CR 615 9 R-MAJ 6.40 66TH AVENUE OSLO ROAD SR 60 CR 615 9 R-MAJ 3.20 69TH STREET/N WINTER BC KINGS HWY us 1 9 R-MAJ 1.40 STH STREET 66TH AVENUE KINGS HIGHWAY 9 R-MAJ 0.90 BABCOCKST CR 512 BREVARD COUNTY LINE 507 10 R-MAJ 4.00 BARBER ST CR 1 512 SCHUMAN DRIVE _CR 9 R-MA5 4.10 BLUE CYPRESS LAKE RD SR 60 BLUE CYPRESS LAKE 8 R-MAJ 0.80 FELLSMERE ROAD SR 60 1-95 CR 512 10 R-MAJ 4.50 GIBSON ST CR 512/FELLSMERE RD CR 505/11OSELAND RD 9 R-MAJ 2.20 HOBART RD/77TH ST 66TH AVENUE US 9 R-MAJ 2.00 LACONIA ROAD CR 51 O/WABASSO RD CR 512IFELLSMERE RD 9 R-MAJ 2.80 OLD DIXIE HWY NORTH RELIEF CANAL SR 510 10 R-MAJ 3.8 ROSELAND ROAD CR 512 US CR 505 1 8 R-MAJ 4.10 S FLEMMING CR 512 jUS 9 IR-MAJ 2.20 SCHUMAN DRIVE" CR 510 jUS 8 JR-MAJ 280 PAGE I OF 4 A I I I R -PA RURAL PRINCIPAL ARTERIAL U -PA URBAN PRINCIPAL ARTERIAL 1 t LOCAL NAME FROM INDIAN RIVER COUNTY PROPOSED FEDERAL FUNCTIONAL CLASSIFICATION FEBRUARY 16,1993 PROPOSED TRIP PURPOSE ARTERIAL COLLECTOR LOCA FED :'•F UN C ........ ":?Y....; { : :.ii RY i:j :� :i+; iiiii:: .. .... j :':; {i iuu ii:{ii:4::<:i ........t .....................n.........n..vnv4...:.....t..................................... TO 11So ARN 1 9 3 4 A R 7 R 9 1A11 19 CI ecs Gtr -Tu R -MA U -MA RURAL MINOR ARTERIAL URBAN MINOR ARTERIAL R-MAJ RURAL MAJOR COLLECTOR U-COLL URBAN COLLECTOR R -MIN RURAL MINOR COLLECTOR 1 t LOCAL NAME FROM INDIAN RIVER COUNTY PROPOSED FEDERAL FUNCTIONAL CLASSIFICATION FEBRUARY 16,1993 PROPOSED TRIP PURPOSE ARTERIAL COLLECTOR LOCA FED :'•F UN C ........ ":?Y....; { : :.ii RY i:j :� :i+; iiiii:: .. .... j :':; {i iuu ii:{ii:4::<:i ........t .....................n.........n..vnv4...:.....t..................................... TO 11So ARN 1 9 3 4 A R 7 R 9 1A11 19 CI ecs Gtr -Tu PAGE 2OF4 FELLSMERE ROAD 1-95 C CR 512 4 7 R -PA 2.20 INTERSTATE SR 60 BREVARD COUNTY LINE 9 1 3 4 R -PA 13.60 INTERSTATE ST LUCIE COUNTY LINE STH STREET 9 1 3 4 R -PA 4.80 RANCH ROAD/82 AVE ST LUCIE COUNTY LINE SR 60 CR 609 4 7 R -PA 5.20 RANCH ROAD/82 AVE 26TH STREET _ ICR 510/WABASSO•ROAD CR 609 4 7 R -PA 6.10 SR 60 OSCEOLA COUNTY LINE 100TH AVENUE 60 1 1 4 5 1 R -PA 2.80 TURNPIKE OKEECHOBEE COUNTY UN OSCEOLA COUNTY LINE 91 1 4 1 R -PA 2.00 TURNPIKE ST LUCIE COUNTY UNE OKEECHOBEE COUNTY LINE 91 1 4 R -PA 7.40 US 1 NORTH RELIEF CANAL BREVARD COUNTY LINE 1 5 1 4 5 R -PA 11.30 WABASSO ROAD CR 512 CR 609 CR 510 4 7 R -PA 3.30 10TH AVENUE 17TH STREET 20TH STREET (SR 60 EB) 8 U-COLL 0.30 12TH STREET CR 613/KING HWY INDIAN RIVER BLVD .9 U-COLL 4.60 12TH STREET 98TH AJENUE CR 609/RANCH ROAD 1 1 9 U-COLL 2.10 16TH STREET KINGS HWY FEC RAILROAD 8 I U-COLL 3.00 16TH STREET 90TH .,VENUE CR 609/RANCH ROAD 9 U-COLL 2.40 17TH STREET FEC RAILROAD OCEAN DRIVE 8 U-COLL' 2.50 20TH AVENUE OSLO ROAD SR 60 8 U-COLL 3.00 20TH AVENUE 23RD STREET SW OSLO ROAD 10 U-COLL 3.25 21 ST STREET US 1 INDIAN RIVER BLVD 8 U-COLL 0.50 23RD STREET US 1 EAST OF 10TH AVENUE 1 9 U=COLL 0.30 26TH STREET KINGS HWY 43RD AVENUE 1 9 U-COLL 0.70 30TH STREET US 1 COUNTRY CLUB DRIVE 8 U-COLL • 0.60 37TH STREET US 1 INDIAN RIVER BLVD 8 U-COLL 1.00 43 AVENUE/CLEMANN AVE PERIMETER ROAD 49TH STREET 8 U-COLL 2.25 43RD AVENUE 13TH ST, SW SR 60 8 I U-COLL 3.40 45TH STREET/MLK BLVD KINGS HWY US 1 8 U-COLL 2.20 4TH STREET KINGS HWY1.{Fa4- ' 9 U-COLL 3.60 5TH STREET SW 43RD AVENUE IOLD DIXIE HWY 10 U-COLL 1.90 PAGE 2OF4 R. Aw cc 00 rT-1 r R -PA RURAL PRINCIPAL ARTERIAL U -PA URBAN PRINCIPAL ARTERIAL R -MA RURAL MINOR ARTERIAL U -MA URBAN MINOR ARTERIAL R-MAJ RURAL MAJOR COLLECTOR U-COLL URBAN COLLECTOR R -MIN RURAL MINOR COLLECTOR LOCAL NAME INDIAN RIVER COUNTY PROPOSED FEDERAL FUNCTIONAL CLASSIFICATION FEBRUARY 16,1993 PROPOSED TRIP PURPOSE ARTERIAL CO FED LOFUNC PAGE 3 OF 4 I E I V I u II 7Z GLASS LENGTH 66TH AVENUE SR 60 26TH STREET CR 615 9 U-COLL 0.30 6TH AVENUE us 1 SR 60 8 U-COLL 0.04 8TH STREET KINGS HIGHWAY INDIAN RIVER BLVD 9 U-COLL 3.80 90TH AVE 12TH STREET SR 60 8 U-COLL 0.90 98TH AVENUE 12TH STREET SR 60 8 U-COLL 0.90 BEACHLAND BLVD 1SR AlA OCEAN DRIVE 10 U-COLL 0.20 - 27 AVENUE OSLO ROAD PERIMETER ROAD C&S 607 8 U-COLL 3.75 27 AVENUE ST LUCIE COUNTY LINE OSLO ROAD 607 9 U-COLL 1.80 HIGHLAND DR/23 ST SW 20TH AVENUE US 10 U-COLL 0.40 OLD DIXIE HWY US NORTH RELIEF CANAL 10 U-COLL 1.90 OLD DIXIE HWY ST LUCIE COUNTY LINE SR 60/20TH STREET -10 U-COLL 5.50 ROYAL PALM BLVD EAST OF 10TH AVENUE INDIAN RIVER BLVD 9 U-COLL 0.70 ROYAL PALM PLACE EAST OF 10TH AVENUE INDIAN RIVER BLVD 9 U-COLL 0.70 S GIFFORD RD/41ST ST KINGS HWY 464 zoi;" N) 8 8U-COLL 10TH AVENUE US 1/SR 5(21 ST STREET) 20TH STREET (SR 60 EB) 7 U 2.30 11TH AVENUE US 1/SR 5(21 ST STREET) 20TH STREET (SR 60 EB) 7 -MA U -MA 0.06 0.06 49TH STREET KINGS HWY US 1/SR 5 7 U -MA 2.00 BEACHLAND BLVD IMERRILL BARBER BRIDGE SR AIA 60 6 U -MA 0.70 KINGS HWY/58TH AVE SW I ST STREET SR 60 CR •613 6 OSLO ROAD 43RD AVENUE US 1/SR 5 1 1-7 U -MA 2.20 ROYAL PALM BLVD INDIAN RIVER BLVD MERRILL BARBER BRIDGE 60 6 U; --MA 3.00 SR AIA SR 60 CR 5101WABASSO ROAD AIA 6 U -MA U -MA 0.50 9.80 SR AIA ST LUCIE COUNTY LINE SR 60 AIA 7 U -MA 6.30 WABASSO ROAD ISLAND DR/URBAN BNDRY SR AlA CR 510 7 U -MA 1.30 20TH PU20TH ST (WB) US 1/SR 5 20TH AVENUE 1 -- 4 U -PA 1.00 20TH PLACE (WB) 6TH AVENUE US 1/SR 5 60 1 4 U -PA 0.20 19TH PU20TH ST (EB) 20TH AVENUE US 1/ SR 5 1 4 U -PA 1. 00 20TH STREET (EB) us 1/SR 5 6TH AVENUE 60 1 —4 U -PA n .20 PAGE 3 OF 4 I E I I 1 R -PA RURAL PRINCIPAL ARTERIAL U -PA URBAN PRINCIPAL ARTERIAL R -MA RURAL MINOR ARTERIAL U -MA URBAN. MINOR ARTERIAL R-MAJ RURAL MAJOR COLLECTOR U-COLL URBAN COLLECTOR R -MIN RURAL MINOR COLLECTOR LOCAL NAME PAGE 4 OF -t rILE.TRIP-IR.WK1 �os y f• Lrzimu 1 n 20TH STREET (TWO WAY) 6TH AVENUE INDIAN RIVER BLVD 60 1 1 1 4 1 1 U -PA 0.30 43RD AVENUE SR 60 26TH STREET PERIMETER RD 5 6 U -PA 0.50 INDIAN RIVER BLVD US 1/SR 5(@4TH STREET) US 1/SR 5 (@53RD STREET) 6 7 U -PA 5.80 INTERSTATE 8TH STREET SR 60 9 1 3 4 U -PA 1.40 KINGS HWY/56TH AVE SR 60 49TH STREET CR 613 6 7 U -PA 2.70 PERIMETER ROAD/26TH ST 43RD AVENUE US 1/SR 5 5 6 U=PA 1.50 RANCH ROAD/82 AVE SR 60 26TH STREET CR 609 1 4 7 1 U -PA 0.50 SR 60 100TH AVENUE 1-95 60 1 4 5 U -PA 17.60 SR 60 43RD AVENUE 20TH AVENUE (20TH AVE) 60 1 4 6 U -PA 1.60 SR 60 1-95 43RD AVENUE 601 4 5 6 U -PA 5.90 US 1 ST LUCIE COUNTY LINE NORTH RELIEF CANAL 1 5 1 4 5 U -PA 11.00 PAGE 4 OF -t rILE.TRIP-IR.WK1 �os y f• REQUEST FROM THE SEBASTIAN CITY COUNCIL FOR WITHDRAWAL OF THE "SEBASTIAN SCRUB" FCT GRANT APPLICATION The Board reviewed the following memo dated 3/1/93: TO: James E. Chandler County Administrator HEAD CONCURRENCE: -- —e - N Community DevelopmezW Director FROM: Roland M. DeBlois; AICP Chief, Environmental Planning DATE: March 1, 1993 RE: Sebastian City Council Request for Withdrawal of the "Sebastian Scrub" FCT Grant Application It is requested that the data herein presented be given formal consideration by the Board of County Commissioners at their regular meeting of March 9, 1993. DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS On January 27, 1993, county staff appeared before the Sebastian City Council to request the Council's support for one of the County's Florida Communities Trust (FCT) land acquisition applications. Located within the corporate limits of the City of Sebastian, the +66 acre "Sebastian Scrub" site, owned by Atlantic Gulf Communities, was submitted to FCT for a matching fund acquisition grant. After some discussion, the Council voted 3 to 1 to pass a motion requesting that "Indian River County withdraw the application [and] for this particular land to remain in our City as industrial zoned properties for development" (see attached). This matter is presented to the Board of County Commissioners for consideration of the request for application withdrawal. Background On November 18, 1992, the County Land Acquisition Advisory Committee (LAAC) conceptually approved staff's request for authorization to submit an FCT grant application for the +66 acre "Sebastian Scrub" tract. LAAC's authorization was contingent upon further review, and. upon approval by the Board of County Commissioners and the Sebastian City Council. On December 15, 1992, the Board of County Commissioners approved the submittal of the Sebastian Scrub site for FCT matching funds, contingent upon final approval by LAAC and concurrence by the Sebastian Council. LAAC granted final submittal approval at their January 6, 1993 meeting, pending City Council review. On December 14, 1993, staff sent a letter to Bruce Cooper, Director of Sebastian Community Development, requesting that the matter be scheduled for City Council consideration, preferably before the 44 booK 88 F�vU QU O A BOOK 88 u,� 4051 January 15, 1993 FCT application submittal deadline. was a follow-up to a previous staff phone discussion with Cooper on the subject. The item was originallyscheduled The letter January 6, 1993 Council meeting, but was ooJan for the 1993 due to an overloaded agenda. Postponed to January 27, Consequently, the application was submitted to the state before the Council's January 27th review, in order to meet the submittal deadline. It was submitted under the premise that the application could later be withdrawn if necessary. At their meeting on February 24, 1993, in consideration of the Council's request, LAAC voted to recommend that the Board of County Commissioners withdraw the "Sebastian Scrub" FCT grant application. ALTERNATIVES & ANALYSIS FCT Requirements Florida Communities Trust staff have indicated that under their program criteria, approval by the Sebastian City Council would eventually be required, because the subject property is wholly within the City of Sebastian. Technically,_ if the County wished to pursue acquisition of the subject property without FCT grant funds, City Council approval would not be a prerequisite. Atlantic Gulf Communities' representative has indicated that they are more than willing to sell the property to the County, to the extent that they would consider selling it at 80% of appraised value if the County acquired it in the coming year. However, in the interest of intergovernmental coordination and cooperation, County acquisition without City concurrence is not recommended. RECOMMENDATIONS Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners direct staff to withdraw the Sebastian Scrub FCT grant application, based on the request of the Sebastian City Council. ON MOTION by Commissioner Macht, SECONDED by Commissioner Eggert, the Board unanimously directed staff to withdraw the Sebastian Scrub FCT grant application, based on the request of the Sebastian City Council. RESOLUTION AMENDING THE FEES PENALTIES AND PROCEDURES RELATED TO THE ENFORCEMENT OF THE ANIMAL CONTROL ORDINANCE The Board reviewed the following memo dated 3/1/93: 45 TO: Board of County Commissioners THROUGH: Jim Chandlrer, ounty Administrator FROM: Doug Wright, Director Department of Emergency Services DATE: March 1, 1993 SUBJECT: Approval Of Resolution Amending The Fees, Penalties, And Procedures Related To The Enforcement Of The Animal Control Ordinance It is respectfully requested that the information contained herein be given formal consideration by the Board of County Commissioners at the next regular scheduled meeting. DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS: On February 13, the Department of Emergency Services received a memorandum from Jeff Barton, Clerk of the Circuit Court. The memorandum was a formal request for staff to take the necessary action to amend Resolution 93-22 to include a collection fee of $5.00 to be paid to the Clerk's Office for collection and handling of impoundment/redemption penalties for the Animal Control Division. The County Attorney's Office has prepared the attached resolution to implement the fee for the Clerk's Office and it is now before the Board for consideration. ALTERNATIVES AND ANALYSIS: Animal Control does have a Clerk's fee of $10.00 for handling citations which is contained in an earlier ordinance passed by the Board, but no fee for handling the impoundment and redemption penalties was included in the Resolution 93-22 referenced above. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Board approve the attached resolution adding a $5.00 fee to be paid to the Clerk's Office for handling the Animal Control Division impoundment and redemption penalties and authorize the Chairman to execute the necessary documents. ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by Commissioner Macht, the Board unanimously adopted Resolution 93-58, amending the fees, penalties and procedures related to the enforcement of the animal control ordinance. 46 MAR e 91993 BOOK 88 a liF.10��2. MAR ® 9 1993 BOOK 88 ur,F.105. -1 RESOLUTION NO. 93- 58 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS AMENDING THE FEES, PENALTIES AND PROCEDURES RELATED TO THE ENFORCEMENT OF THE ANIMAL CONTROL ORDINANCE. WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners has from time to time established certain fees, penalties and procedures related to the enforcement of the Animal Control Ordinance; and WHEREAS, the current resolution (#93-22) does not provide for a collection fee for the Clerk's Office; and WHEREAS, said fee is necessary for the proper operation of the Clerk's Office, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY,. FLORIDA that: 1. The fees, penalties and procedures established in Resolution #93-22 are hereby superseded by this Resolution. 2. The fees, penalties and procedures are revised as follows: a. Licensing Fees 1. Female or male, dog or cat, initial or renewal license, not sterilized -- $10.00 per year. 2. Female or male, dog. or cat, initial or renewal, sterilized -- $5.00 per year. 3. Half price to be assessed for issuance of any initial license issued for six months or less. 4. All renewals shall be at full price per category. 5. Additional late charge for licensing after date required by law -- $5.00. 6. Fee for issuance of duplicate license tag -- $3.00 7. There is no fee required for an animal license for the year in which the animal is sterilized. Additions are indicated by underline -1- 47. L_ _I M P-7 C. d. e. RESOLUTION NO. 93- 5 8 8. There is no license fee required for police dogs (sheriff and municipal police departments), sight assisting dogs and hearing assistance dogs; however, said dogs are required to be licensed. 9. All licensing fees are to be paid to the Department of Emergency Services, Animal Control Division of Indian River County, Florida. Impoundment Fees $5.00 per diem or part thereof for all animals. Redemption Penalties in addition to Impoundment Fees First Offense Wavier Second Offense $15.00 Third Offense $30.00 Fourth Offense and subsequent offenses $60.00 Impoundment fees and redemption penalties shall be paid during business hours at the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court, Indian River County Courthouse, 2145 14th Avenue, Vero Beach, Florida. Impoundment and redemption penalties shall be paid during non -business hours at a location to be designated by the Animal Control Director. In addition to all other fees and penalties, there is a collection fee of $5.00 that is to be paid to the Clerk of the Circuit Court. An owner shall pay all actual expenses or fees incurred for which the County has obligated itself for additional care for quarantine or veterinary services as an impoundment fee, at time of redemption of the animal. f. Rabies vaccination prepayment fee for redemption shall be $15.00 per animal. Additions are indicated by underline wz 48 f IAS ® ®OOK �� PAGE 05 -7 BOOK 88 Pd;r,105 RESOLUTION NO. 93-58 g. Civil penalties for violation of the Code: Approved Dais See attached Exhibit "A" (—& 13 /3/93 h. All fees, penalties, charges and expenses shall be paid prior to release of an animal from an impoundment facility. 3_1 _c 3 The resolution was moved for adoption by Commissioner Eggert and the motion was seconded by Commissioner Macht , and, upon being put to a vote, the vote was as follows: Chairman Richard N. Bird Aye Commissioner John W. Tippin Aye Commissioner Carolyn K. Eggert Aye Commissioner Fran B. Adams Aye Commissioner Kenneth R. Macht Aye The Chairman thereupon declared the resolution duly passed and adopted this 9 day of March , 1993. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA By--�tl�✓'�_L� Richard N. Bird Chairman Attest Jeffrey K. Barton, Clerk /'�) e. inifian Riva Cn Approved Dais Admin (—& 13 /3/93 Legal_ l) E3udgel Dept( 3_1 _c 3 Risk Mgr. N� Additions are indicated by underline -3- 49 ,61 y1,6 rr "�4 RESOLUTION NO. 911-23 A RESOLUTION OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY 11110V I U I PJC FOR: ESTAI3L 1 SI IMENT OF CIVIL I'ENALYT€S- UR-SPECTI=TC SEC T I ONS i'3F'TRF'ARTI�iAL��i3RT1iaL-c�RGTFJ1tFiC1: . WHEREAS. the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County pursuant to Florida Statutes Chapter 828.27 has adopted an animal control ordinance which provides for the issuance of citations to persons who have committed civil Infractions in violation of the duly enacted -ordinance and which provides that the Board may establish civil penalties up to $500 for violation of provision of the ordinance, NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved by the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida, as follows: 1. The County does- hereby adopt the following schedule of civil penalties to be imposed for violations of specific sections of the animal control ordinance; CODE SECTION DESCRIPTION OF VIOLATION IST 2ND 3RD Sec. 3-3 Failure to vaccinate, license, collar or harness $25 $100 $200 Sec. 3-S(1) Failure to keep animal under restraint $25 $50 $75 Sec. 3-5(2) Animal creating nuisance $10 $25 $75 Sec. 3-S(3) Failure to confine female dog or cat in heat $25 $50 $100 Sec. 3-5(4) Failure to confine or `' restrain vicious animal $100 $200 $300 Sec. 3-5(5) Failure to provide adequate care to animal $25 $50 $100 Sec. 3-5(6) Exposing poisonous substance in common area or property of another $100 $200 $300 Sec. 3-5(7) Failure to notify owner or authority of injury to animal $25 $50 $75 Sec. 3-5(8) Teasing or molesting an animal $25 $SO $75 Sec. 3-5(9) Failure to properly confine or restrain animal in pick -tip truck $15 $100 $100 Sec. 3-6(c) Violation of provision of Chapter 825, F.S. $50 $100 $200 50 MAR ®91993 �ooK �� F�,�G 105 6 LIAR 91993 BOOK 8 8 ,uu 10 5 7 Sec. 3-9(c) Falhire to comply with vicious dog licensing and O�•ot %uJ maintenance requirements $100 $200 $300 Sec. 3-10 Livestock running at large $20 $50 $75 Sec. 3-10 Keeping wild animal in violation of F.S. 372 $50 $100 $200 Sec. 3-14 Interference with animal control authority $50 $100 $200 NOW. THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA that the establishment of civil penalties for specific sections of the animal control ordinance be provided. The foregoing resolution was offered by Commissioner Scurlock and seconded by Commissioner Wht ' eF �-' __ and upon being put to a vote the vote was as ToTTOWS Chairman Carolyn K. EggertAye Vice Chairman Richard N. Bird __ �e Commissioner Margaret C. Bowman AYe __ Commissioner Don C. Scurlock, Jr. Jye Commissioner Gary C. Wheeler Aye The Chairman thereupon declared the resolution duly passed and adopted at public hearing held this 20th day of February _ 0 1990. ATTEST: By• ��! eVey-7. arson, Clerk v •• V �,f&.0 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA. By CaroTyn , .-Eggert, ah i r an 51. O�•ot %uJ 2 - l� -�ic Al Sk L AWARD BID #3060 - WATER EXPANSION PLAN - CONTRACT C The Board reviewed the following memo dated 2/23/93: DATE: February 23, 1993 TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS THRU: James E. Chandler, County Administrator H.T. "Sonny" Dean, Director Department of General Servi J0 FROM: Fran Boynton Powell, Purchasing Manager 3V SUBJ: Award Bid 113060/Water Expansion Plan Contract C Utilities Department BACKGROUND INFORMATION Bid Opening Date: Advertising Dates: Specifications Mailed To: Replies: VENDOR Tri -Sure Corporation Auburndale, FL Speegle Construction Cocoa, FL A.O.B. Underground Indiantown, FL P & C Construction Murdock, FL Hall Contracting Clearwater, FL Johnson -Davis Inc Lantana, FL JoBear Palm Bay, FL TOTAL AMOUNT OF BID• .February 3, 1993 December 23, 30, 1992 Sixty Six (66) Vendors Seven (7) Vendors BID TABULATION $285,927.40 8295,000.00 8297,433.85 $345,870.00 $353,307.28 8356,551.00 8394,583.42 8285,927.40 SOURCE OF S: Utilities General Impact Fees BUDGETED AMOUNT: 81,661,272.61 (This is a total budgeted amount for all five Water Expansion Contracts, A-E). RECOIMIENDAT ION: Staff recommends that the bid be awarded to Tri -Sure Corporation as the lowest, most responsible and responsive bidder meeting specifications as set forth in the Invitation to Bid. In addition, staff requests the Board's approval of the attached Agreement when allrequirements are met and •approved as to form by the County Attorney. 52 BOOK 88 FACE �� 8 F, MAR - 9 1991 Bou 88 uu 1051 Commissioner Adams asked how we stand on Contracts A, B, C, and D with regard to budgets, and Utilities Director Terry Pinto explained that they came in under the budgeted amount. Commissioner Eggert commented that it would be nice to have the budgeted amount shown for each contract along with the total budgeted amount for the project. Chairman Bird understood that the type of work covered under Contracts C and D is fairly similar, but did not understand why bidders can go from low bidder on one contract to high bidder on another. Director Pinto explained that the bids vary because there might be bridges, columns, etc. that a contractor might not be able to do themselves. ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by Commissioner Tippin, the Board unanimously awarded Bid #3060 to Tri -Sure Corporation in the amount of $285,927.40, and approved the Agreement upon fulfillment of all requirements, as recommended by staff. AGREEMENT IS ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD AWARD BID #3061 - WATER EXPANSION PLAN, PHASE II CONTRACT D The Board reviewed the following memo dated 2/25/93: DATE: February 25, 1993 TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS THRU: James E. Chandler, County Administrator H.T. "Sonny" Dean, Directo Department of General Seryres FROM: Fran Boynton Powell, Purchasing Manager SUBJ: Award Bid #3061/Water Expansion Plan Phase II - Contract D/ Utilities Dept. 13AC OROUND INFORMATION: Bid Opening Date: February 3, 1993 Advertising Dates: Dec 23, 30, Jan 6, 1993 Specifications Mailed To: Sixty Six (66) Vendors Replies: Six (6) Vendors VENDOR HID TABULATION A.O.B Underground $194,112.49 Indiantown, FL 53 Speegle Construction Cocoa, FL Hall Contracting Clearwater, FL P & C Construction Murdock, FL Johnson -Davis Lantana, FL Tri -Sure Corporation Auburndale, FL TOTAL AMOUNT OF BID: r L $217,000.00 $226,907.49 $231,704.90 $238,920.25 $344,598.00 $194,112.49 SOURCE OF FUNDS: Utilities General - Impact Fees BUDGETED AMOUNT: *$1,661,272.61 This figure represents the total cost of all five contracts for this project, Contract A-E. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the bid be awarded to A.O.B. Underground as the lowest, most responsive and responsible bidder meeting specifications as set forth in the Invitation to Bid. In addition, staff requests Board appoval of the attached Agreement when all the requirements are met and approved as to form by the County Attorney. ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by Commissioner Macht, the Board unanimously awarded Bid #3061 to A.O.B. Underground in the amount of $194,112.49, and approved the Agreement as recommended by staff. AGREEMENT IS ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD 54 'MAR - 91993 �ooK �'•$Ucpo BAR m 91993 BOOK 1061 AWARD HID #3051 - WEST REGIONAL SEWER PLANT FORCE MAIN The Board reviewed the following memo dated 2/25/93: --------------------------------------------------------- DATE: February 25, 1993 TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS THRU: James E. Chandler, County Admin'strator H.T. "Sonny" Dean, Director Department of General Servi s FROM: Fran Boynton Powell, Purchasing Manager SUBJ: Award Bid #3051/West Regional Sewer Plant Force Main -------------------------------------------------------- US -87 -07 -DC BACKGROUND INFORMATION: Bid Opening Date: January 27, 1993 Advertising Dates: Dec 15, 22, Jan 5, 19 Specifications Mailed to: Twenty Eight (28) Vendors Replies: Ten (10) Vendors VENDOR BID TAB V iDOR BID TAB JoBear $314,633.00 Barton Const $335,600.00 Palm Bay,.FL Clewiston, FL Schopke Const. $314,900.00 P & C Const. $337,471.00 Melbourne, FL Murdock, FL Speegle Coast. $321,000.00 Chaz Equip $340,000.00 Cocoa, FL Delray Beach, FL Derrico Const. $328,995.00 A.O.B. $355,542.79 Melbourne, FL Indiantown, FL Tri -Sure Corp $334,950.00 Driveways $420,926.00 Auburndale, FL Titusville, FL TOTAL AMOUNT OF BID: $314,633.00 SOURCE OF FUNDS: Utilities General - Impact Fees BUDGETED AMOUNT: $343,000.00 RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the bid be awarded to JoBear as the lowest, most responsive and responsible bidder meeting specifications as set forth in the Invitation to Bid. In addition, staff requests the Board's approval of the attached Agreement when all requirements are met and approved as to form by the County Attorney. 55 r ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by Commissioner Adams, the Board unanimously awarded Bid ,#3051 to JoBear, Inc. in the amount of $314,633.00, and approved the Agreement, as recommended by staff. AGREEMENT IS ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD AWARD BID #3056 - WESTERN SUBREGIONAL EFFLUENT PUMP STATION The Board reviewed the following memo dated 2/25/93: DATE: February 25, 1993 TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS THRU: James E. Chandler, County Administrator H.T. "Sonny" Dean, Director ,� Department of General Services FROM: Fran Boynton Powell, Purchasing Manager SUBJ: Award Bid #3056/Western Subregional Effluent Pump Station - Utilities Department BACKGROUND INFORMATION: Bid Opening Date: Advertising Dates: Specifications Mailed To: Replies: VENDOR Speegle Construction Cocoa, FL Wharton -Smith Lake Monroe, FL GBS Excavating Ft Pierce, FL McMahan Construction Co Deland, FL Hall Contracting Corporation St Petersburg, FL Florida Design Irrigation, Inc Lake Park, FL Chaz Equipment Co., Inc Delray Beach, FL Edisto Contracting, Inc Tampa, FL TLC Diversified, Inc West Palm Beach, FL 56 January 27, 1993 Dec 15, 22, Jan 5, 19 Twenty Seven Vendors Nine (9) Vendors BID TABULATION $317,000.00 $337,000.00 $351,735.00 $353,500.00 $363,919.11 $391,355.00 $419,700.00 $445,991.99 $569,499.00 BOOK 88 F F V Z TOTAL AMOUNT OF BID: $317,000.00 BOOK. 88 Fir 106.3 . SOURCE OF FUNDS: Utilities General - Impact Fees BUDGETED AMOUNTS $330,000.00 REC NNZNDATION : Staff recommends that the bid be awarded to Sneevle Construction. Inc. as the lowest, most responsive and responsible bidder meeting specifications as set forth in the Invitation to Bid. In addition, staff requests Board appoval of the attached Agreement when all the requirements are met and approved as to form by the County Attorney. ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED by Commissioner Eggert, the Board unanimously awarded Bid 13056 to Speegle Construction, Inc. in the amount of $317,000.00, and approved the Agreement, as recommended by staff. AGREEMENT WILL BE PLACED ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD WHEN FULLY EXECUTED AND RECEIVED AWARD BID #3069/ROSELAND WATER TOWER PROJECT The Board reviewed the following memo dated 2/25/93: ------------------------------------------------------ DATE: February 25, 1993 TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS THRU: James E. Chandler, County Administrator H.T. "Sonny" Dean, Director Department of General Serviae4s FROM: Fran Boynton Powell, Purchasing Manager SUBJ: Award Bid #3069/Roseland Water Tower Project #UW -92 -07 -DS Utilities Department BACKGROUND INFORMATION ` Bid Opening Date: February 17, 1993 Advertising Dates: January 27, Feb 3, 1993 Specifications Mailed To: Eight (8) Vendors Replies: Four (4) Vendors 57 VENDOR BID TABULATION Brown Steel Contractors $ 861,000.00 Newnan, Ga PDM $ 887,400.00 Atlanta, GA Caldwell Tank $ 955,000.00 Louisville, RY CBI-NACON $1,284,000.00 Norcross, GA TOTAL BID AMOUNT: $ 861,000.00 SOURCE OF FUNDS: Utilities General - Impact Fees BUDGETED AMOUNT: $ 975,000.00 RECOMMENDATION: Staff requests that the bid be awarded to Brown Steel Contractors, as the lowest, most responsive and responsible bidder meeting specifications as set forth in the Invitation to Bid. In addition, staff requests approval by the Board of the attached Agreement when all requirements are met and approved as to form by the County Attorney. ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED by Commissioner Eggert, the Board unanimously awarded Bid #3069 to Brown Steel Contractors in the amount of $861,000 and approved the Agreement, as recommended by staff. AGREEMENT IS ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD 58 MAR - 9 1993 BOOK 88 PAGUE 1001 MAS P 1.9 BOOK 88 F.,;F 0��' i FINAL PAY REQUEST AND CHANGE ORDER NO. 1 - NORTH COUNTY WATER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM, PHASE I The Board reviewed the following memo dated 2/22/93: DATE: FEBRUARY 22, 1993 TO: JAMES E. CHANDLER COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR FROM: TERRANCE G. PINTO DIRECTO UT ITY SERVICES PREPARED H. D. ' OSTER, P.E. AND STAFFED ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEER BY: DEPARTMENT OF UTILITY SERVICES SUBJECT: FINAL PAY REQUEST AND CHANGE ORDER NO. 1 NORTH COUNTY WATER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM, PHASE I IRC PROJECT NO. UW -90 -05 -DS BACKGROUND The Board of County Commissioners awarded the subject project on March 10, 1992, to TLC Diversified, Inc., of West Palm Beach, Florida. The original contract price was $204,062.00; the final contract price including Change Order No. 1 is $184.949.20. The contractor has previously been paid $147,776.46. ANALYSIS The attached change order reflects a decrease of $19,112.80 in the contract price, and requests a 51 -day extension. When the City of Sebastian requested Indian River County to delete its water line to serve Park Place, we revised the project to remove the Stratton Avenue portion of the project (1920 L.F.). The change order reflects this deletion; it also adds 379 L.F.-of water main to supply County water to the Mobile Home Park at the end of Vickers Road; it extended the water main on U.S. #1 southward to cross an existing ditch; it provided for a wet tap and tie-in to Pelican Pointe; and it provided for additional sodding. Also, liquidated damages of 36 days at $200.00 per day due to late completion of the project are being assessed. Substantial completion was established as November 13, 1992. RECOMMENDATION The staff of the Department of Utility Services recommends the approval of Change Order No. 1 and further recommends that the Board of County Commissioners approve the final pay request of the Contractor, TLC Diversified, Inc., of West Palm Beach, Florida, in the amount of $37,172.74 as payment in full. Indian Rpm ca Approved ! Admin Lagel Budget Utilities 2'.§T� Rick Mgr. 59 Commissioner Macht asked the reason for the deduction in the contract amount, and Utilities Director Terry Pinto explained that usually the quantity of pipe is less than the estimated quantity. ON MOTION by Commissioner Macht, SECONDED by Commissioner Eggert, the Board unanimously approved Change Order #1 and Final Pay Request by TLC Diversified, Inc. in the amount of $37,172.74, as set out in the above staff recommendation. CHANGE ORDER 11 AND FINAL PAYMENT IS ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS FOR UTILITIES DEPARTMENT SURVEY NEEDS The Board reviewed the following memo dated 2/26/93: DATE: FEBRUARY 26, 1993 TO: JAMES E. CHANDLER COUNTY ADMINISTRAT R FROM: TERRANCE G. PINT DIRECTOR OF UTILtTW SERVICES PREPARED WILL�ROJECCTS AIN AND STAFFED CAPI ENGINEER BY: DEPARUTILITY SERVICES SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS FOR UTILITIES DEPAR9ENT SURVEY NEEDS BACKGROUND _. A Request for Proposals (RFP) was issued by the Utilities Department in November 1992 to select firms for continuing services (survey work for the Utilities design projects). Selection is now complete, and we are Coming to the Board of County Commissioners for authorization to prepare and execute contracts with the short-listed firms. ANALYSIS A total of nine firms submitted qualifications on the RFP (see attached memo dated November 30, 1992). Of the nine firms, six were selected to make presentations (see attached memo dated January 15, 1993). Presentations were made on February 4, and four firms were selected to receive contracts. For survey projects under $10,000, quotes will be obtained from all four firms; however, the firms were also ranked (1-4) for projects over the $10,000 cutoff. The firm names and their ranking are as follows: 1) Masteller, Moler and Reed 2) H. F. Lenz 3) Carter Associates 4) Kimball -Lloyd RECOMMENDATION The staff of the Department of Utility Services recommends that the Board of County Commissioners approve preparation of continuing services contracts with the -above -listed firms. 60 L_ MAR o 9199 ROOK 88 F'arF 1O6 MAR - 9 199,3 pp BOOK 88 Commissioner Adams asked how the 4 firms were selected, and Utilities Director Terry Pinto explained that in the short-list process they do a point grade on all of the firms and pick the top 4. The Selection Committee determines how many firms will be interviewed, but we are only required to interview 3. In this case it was determined that 4 firms were qualified to be on the short list. Commissioner Adams also had a question about the surveys, and Director Pinto explained that the surveys are actually boundary surveys, not studies. Commissioner Macht had some questions on why certain firms were selected, and Assistant Utilities Director Harry Asher advised that he would provide Commissioner Macht with that information after the meeting. ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by Commissioner Adams, the Board unanimously approved the preparation of continuing services contracts with the above -listed firms, as recommended by staff. _ T ALL _FQUR CQNTRAr�'S„rARE ONFILE IN IHE OFFICE OF CLERK TO THE BOARD LEAD AND COPPER TEST REQUIREMENTS AND RESULTS FOR SOUTH COUNTY R.O. FACILITY The Board reviewed the following memo dated 3/1/93: DATE: MARCH 1, 1993 TO: JAMES E. CHANDLER COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR FROM: TERRANCE G. PINTO " DIRECTOR OF UTILITY SERVICES STAFFED AND PREPARED BY: WILLIAM F. McCAIN CAPITAL ENGINEER DEPARIJ F UTILITY SERVICES SUBJECT: LEAD AND COPPER TEST REQUIREMENTS AND RESULTS FOR INDIAN RIVER COUNTY SOUTH COUNTY R.O. FACILITY BACKGROUND.• In 1992, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) promulgated a new lead and copper regulation, stemming from the 1986 Safe Drinking Water Act passed by Congress. To comply with this regulation: 1) The Utilities Department was required to submit a lead and copper sampling plan to the Department of Environmental Regulation (DER) by July 1992 (see attached). 2) The Utilities Department was required. to take 60 total samples (at the tap) after a six -hour waiting period to allow the detection of any lead leaching that may be occurring in the homes" plumbing systems. These sample results were submitted to DER on January 1, 1993 (see attached test results). 3) If a sample exceeded .015 ppm, notice must be provided to failed sites, as well as all customers (see attached letters). 4) Also see• attached summary of EPA lead* and copper regulation requirements. 61 ANALYSIS• After completing an analysis of the required sample data, it was determined that 17 of the 60 sites exceeded the .015 ppm regulation level. We are now required to mail notice to customers as outlined in the DER requirements, and are proceeding to do so. As can be seen from the attached lead and copper regulation summary, a corrosion control study must be complete by July of 1995; however, the Utilities Department is already 90% complete with this study in conjunction with Betz Entec chemical company (a manufacturer of corrosion;control chemicals). The Utilities Department is proposing to sole source its corrosion inhibitors from this company for one year to allow the completion of a full scale corrosion test into our distribution system. We are therefore seeking approval to sole source the County�s corrosion inhibitor and injection system from Betz Entec for both the South County and North Beach R.O. facilities at a yearly cost not to exceed $40,000.00 for South County and $6,000.00 for North Beach. Also, an additional $5,000.00 will be expended per plant for construction of concrete pads to support the bulk chemical storage tanks. The total cost of these systems will be offset by as much as 30% by a corresponding reduction in the use of caustic soda for pH adjustment at both plants. At the end of the one-year period (if all testing is positive), we will bid this service out through the Purchasing Department. All of our remaining smaller plants (i.e., North Beach, Rivers Edge, Pelican Pointe, Hobart Landing, Copeland Landing) are required to be sampled between July 1993 and December 1993, a program that we are proceeding with; however, we wish to install a full-scale corrosion inhibitor system immediately at both the South County R.O. and North Beach R.O. facilities. Installation at the North Beach facility should eliminate the possibility of any failed samples there. We are further proposing to have our water plant continuing services engineer, Camp Dresser & McKee Inc. (CDM), handle all plant permit modifications, as they are a recognized expert in this field. The upper limit for the permit modification services we are requesting is $5,000.00. RECOMMENDATION• The staff of the Department of Utility Services recommends that the Board of County Commissioners approve the following actions: 1) Approval to sole source the County's corrosion inhibitor systems as outlined above, and 2) Approval to utilize our water plant continuing services engineer to perform the required permit modification at both R.O. facilities. Fees for these services are not to exceed $5,000.00. Commissioner Macht questioned the PH level and Bill McCain, capital projects engineer, advised that right now we are running at 8.5 which is what has kept us in compliance. Utilities Director Terry Pinto felt the best recommendation is to let the water run awhile when it has not been turned on for awhile. Commissioner Adams objected to us being required to go into homes to see if they have high lead levels in their plumbing and she hoped that they don't come back at some time in the future and ask us to go into every home. She felt this is just another case of being overregulated. Next thing you know, we will be asked to go into peoples' homes to see if there is any radiation leaking from their microwave ovens. Director Pinto stressed that this is not just a state requirement, it is a national effort. ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by Commissioner Adams, the Board unanimously approved Items #1 and #2 as set out in the above staff recommendation. C, MAR - 9 1993 BOOK 88 F.gF 1® 8 BOOK V8 P'Ar" V6.1 MAR - 9 199 ANALYSIS OF THE BASE FACILITY CHARGE COMPONENT OF THE CURRENT RATE STRUCTURE The Board reviewed the following memo dated 2/24/93: DATE: FEBRUARY 241 1993 TO: JAMES E. CHANDLER COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR FROM: TERRANCE G. PINT / DIRECTOR OF UTILITY SERVICES PREPARED AND STAFFED HARRY E. ASHERlo� BY: ASSISTANT DIRE TOR OF UTILITY SERVICES SUBJECT: ANALYSIS OF THE BASE FACILITY CHARGE COMPONENT OF THE CURRENT RATE STRUCTURE BACKGROUND: The current rate structure was adopted by the County in 1984 after completion of a Cost of Service and Rate Setting Study by Arthur Young & Company and was updated in 1991 by the CH2MHil1 Rate Study. Some of the major factors considered in adopting the current rate structure were as follows: Financial Sufficiency, - Rate structure would generate sufficient revenues over time to recover operating and capital costs, and provide sufficient working capital. Equity - Rate structure charges customers or customer classes in proportion to the costs of providing service to these customer groups. Impact on Customer Classes - Rate structure results in the least economic impact on classes of water and wastewater customers. ..vuL&Ji.Lance wa.Ln Appropriate Legal Authorities - Rate structure is consistent with existing County ordinances as well as state and federal statutes, such as EPA user charge regulations. Avoidance of Discriminatory Rate Relationships - Rate structure avoids relationships which cause one customer class to subsidize another customer class. The cost of providing water and wastewater service must be recovered through appropriate charges to customers. The current rate structure to recover these costs consists of the following: (1) Fixed Charges - The monthly fixed charges which represent a the minimum mount that each customer must pay. The fixed charge recovers two type of costs: (a) Billing Charge - Recovers customer costs for billing, collection, meter reading and customer service. (b) availability costs related to havi available for use by customers. Avai are allocated to each customer 63 - Recovers facilities bility costs based upon equivalent residential units (ERU). The fixed charge per ERU provides for no minimum allowance of consumption. With the exception of utility and specific treatment and production costs, the majority of operating and capital costs (80%) could be considered fixed charges during a rate base period. A fixed charge guarantees the utility a major portion of its required revenues during periods of reduced customer usage. (2) Volume Charge - Recovers specific treatment/production costs established as a unit charge per thousand gallons. ANALYSIS: This analysis was performed with the following assumptions: (1) Actual 1991-92 sales units were used as the base period. (2) The 1992-93 rates were applied to the 1991-92 sales units for revenue projections. (3) Deductions to sales units were made for existing reserved capacity, projected seasonal units, and elasticity adjustment for a decrease in volume units to reflect the effect of a rate structure without a base facility charge. If a rate structure without a base facility charge was adopted, the loss of revenue from the reserved capacity units and residential seasonal units would result in the following: (1) Revenues from reserved capacity in the amounts of $394,159 (8.77% of 92-93 water revenues) and $959,489 (17.00% of wastewater revenues) would be recovered through the volume charge to existing customers. (2) The effect of the reduction of revenue from the reduced capacity units (development), residential seasonal units, and elasticity by removing the base facility charge and recovery of the revenues through the volume charge are projected as follows: REVENUE WATER 64 1AR - poor r" c �o Commercial Residential Reserved Totals 1992-93 $850,115 $31387,392 $394,159 $4,6311667 of Total 18.91% 75.34% 8.77% 100% W/O Base $1,096,285 $3,535,382 $0 $4,631,667 Facility 24.38% 78.63% 0% 100% Inc Doc $246,169 $147,990 ($394,159) $0 64 1AR - poor r" c �o I PEAR -9 REVENUE WASTEWATER BOOK 88 P, u-1071 Based on reductions for reserved capacity units, residential seasonal units and elasticity adjustment for decrease in volume units, water volume charges would increase from an average of $1.99 per thousand gallons to $4.75 per thousand gallons and wastewater volume charge would increase from $3.35 per thousand gallons to $12.09 per thousand gallons. The water volume charge per thousand gallons would increase by 238.69% and the sewer volume charge would increase by 360.89%. The effect of removing the base facility charge would be the recovery of costs for providing the availability of service for reserved capacity (development) and residential seasonal customers from existing annual users of the system. As indicated in the attachments the following effect on a combined water and sewer monthly billing would occur: (a) The bill for a average residential water and sewer customer using 5,000 gallons would increase by 83.6% or $42.22 monthly/$506.64 annually. (b) The bill for a commercial water and sewer customer using 10,000 gallons monthly would increase by 125.3% or $96.09 monthly/$1,153.08 annually. RECOMMENDATION: The Staff of the Department of Utility Services believes that if the rate structure was modified to remove the base facility charge, it would create an inequity between customers of the system (existing and future) and would be detrimental to the overall financial stability of the system. The Staff believes that the existing rate structure provides financial sufficiency, equity between customer classes, compliance with legal authorities (EPA user charge regulations), and avoids relationships which cause one customer class to subsidize another customer class. M s � � Commercial Residential Reserved Totals 1992-93 $1,435,213 $3,249,861 $959,489 $5,644,563 % of Total 25.43% 57.58% 17.00% 100% W/O Base $1,603,752 $4,040,811 $0 $5,644,563 Facility 28.41% 71.59% 0% 100% Inc/Dec $168,539 $790,950 ($959,489) $0 Based on reductions for reserved capacity units, residential seasonal units and elasticity adjustment for decrease in volume units, water volume charges would increase from an average of $1.99 per thousand gallons to $4.75 per thousand gallons and wastewater volume charge would increase from $3.35 per thousand gallons to $12.09 per thousand gallons. The water volume charge per thousand gallons would increase by 238.69% and the sewer volume charge would increase by 360.89%. The effect of removing the base facility charge would be the recovery of costs for providing the availability of service for reserved capacity (development) and residential seasonal customers from existing annual users of the system. As indicated in the attachments the following effect on a combined water and sewer monthly billing would occur: (a) The bill for a average residential water and sewer customer using 5,000 gallons would increase by 83.6% or $42.22 monthly/$506.64 annually. (b) The bill for a commercial water and sewer customer using 10,000 gallons monthly would increase by 125.3% or $96.09 monthly/$1,153.08 annually. RECOMMENDATION: The Staff of the Department of Utility Services believes that if the rate structure was modified to remove the base facility charge, it would create an inequity between customers of the system (existing and future) and would be detrimental to the overall financial stability of the system. The Staff believes that the existing rate structure provides financial sufficiency, equity between customer classes, compliance with legal authorities (EPA user charge regulations), and avoids relationships which cause one customer class to subsidize another customer class. M s � � - M M Utilities Director Terry Pinto noted that over the last two years there has been some concern about rates for seasonal customers and rates for residences which are hooked up but don't use any flow from the system. After doing this analysis, staff believes that if the rate structure was modified to remove the base facility charge, it would create an inequity between customers of the system (existing and future) and would be detrimental to the overall financial stability of the system. He referred to the following sections of the analysis: Explanation of Rate Components and Fees • Billing Charge - • The.charge imposed by the County for recovery of expenses associated with billing, collecting, and accounting services. • Base Facilities Charge - • The charge imposed by the County for each equivalent residential unit* (ERU) that recovers the fixed costs to the County of having the system available to serve that ERU without regard to volume used. • Volume Charge - • The charge imposed by the County for the monthly volume used to recover the associated expenses for the production and/or treatment of the service provided. • Impact Fee - • The fee charged by the County to real property owners to fund the capital cost incurred by the water and wastewater utility to serve new utility customers. • *Equivalent Residential Unit (ERU) - • The amount of water used or wastewater produced by a typical residential unit, which water use ranges from 0 to 300 gallon's per day on a maximum day basis or 250 gallons per day on a maximum month basis. 66 MAR - 91993 BOOK 88 PArF 107 2- S14" $12 $101 S8! Sha S40 $20 s0 BOOK 88 PAGE 1073 7 Current Utility Rates • Water with Base Facility Charge tttumg ume Base Facility Charge VOW= Charge Comparison of Sewer Monthly Billing With & W/o Base Facility Charge c,vw gays 3,000 gala 4,000 gals 5,000 gab 10,000 gals 67 � With Base Fac s W/O Base Fac $loo $BO $60 $2 Comparison of Combined Water &Sewer Monthly Billing With & W/O Base Facility Charge Comparison of Combined Water &Sewer Monthly Billing With & W/O Base Facility Charge - Seasonal Resident - 5,000 Gals. Av. Usage J F M A M 7 �+ •• 68 -- WrM BASE FAC - S463.14 — W/o BASE FAC - $556.20 Increase of 20.1% MAR - 91993 POOK 88 PAu lO TY BOOK 88 PD F. 075 -7 Comparison of Combined Water &Sewer Monthly Billing With & W/O Base Facility Charge - Seasonal Resident - 3,000 Gals. Av. Usage sea sso so S30 S2o $10 so J F M' A M J J A S O N D — WITH BASE FAC - $403.14 — W/O BASE FAC - $322.80 Decrease of 19.9% Commissioner Adams asked why our water costs are higher than those in cities up north such as Milwaukee, and Director Pinto pointed out that she was comparing our system to those which have been in place for a long time and*were built at lower costs. In the initial stages, we went out and borrowed almost $20 -million that has to be paid back. Then we changed to an impact fee system. In addition, there is the operation cost of the reverse osmosis process. He emphasized that more and more communities in Florida are going to the R.O. process because the water quality is not good in this state. To meet those standards, the operating costs are substantial. In New Jersey where he came from, you merely drew water out, chlorinated it, and distributed it. That was the extent of it, and it met all standards. Unfortunately, the quality of water starts out much less in Florida and costs more to treat. Commissioner Eggert recalled that during the workshops back in November and December, people suggested that we decrease our rates during the summer when people are away. Director Pinto referred to the following worksheet and gave a very technical explanation of why that would not be feasible: C=V7 Worksheet 6 Indian River County Fwed. Variable. & Customer Allocation Percentages of Operation and Maintenance Costs find Variable Sit Wates Salaries and Wages Benefits Contractual Services Operations Supplies Other Supplies Bad Debt & Land Use Amortization Operations Maintenance and Repairs SewerUtift Salaries and Wages Benefits Contractual Services Operations Supplies Other Supplies Bad Debt & Land Use Amortization Operations Maintenance and Repairs Other Contractual Services Other Services and Equipment Fuel and Lubricants Grove Maintenance General Salaries and Wages Benefits Contractual Services Travel ' Office Supplies Reserve - Salaries 70 80.00/0 20.0% 80.0% 20.0% 100.0% 100.0% 20.0% 80.0% 100.0% 100.0% 80.00/0 20.0% 80.00/0 20.0% 100.0% 100.0% 20.0% 80.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 50.0% 50.0% 100.0% 100.0% 50.0% 50.0% 50.0% 100.0% 50.0% BOOK 88 FarF I®1 4 r MAR = 9 1993 BORK 88 PAGE. 1077 Commissioner Eggert felt the worksheet should show the amounts, not just the percentages, and Director Pinto advised that a decrease in consumption would not effect a decrease in rates because the operational costs still would be there. Commissioner Macht felt that a combination of consumption charges and the base facility charge is the fairest way to do it. Chairman Bird emphasized that the Board wants the operation run in the most cost effective way and the charges passed on to the customers in the fairest and most equitable way. He always felt that the best thing the Commission could do with regard to utility rates was to see that we hire the best County Administrator and Utilities Director and scrutinize all recommendations for fees, bids, proposals, etc. Director Pinto noted that this item was for informational purposes only and that no action is needed this morning. WATER SERVICE TO 102ND TERRACE AND 99TH WAY RESOLUTIONS I AND II The Board reviewed the following memo dated 2/26/93: DATE: FEBRUARY 26, 1993 TO: JAMES E. CHANDLER COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR FROM: TERRANCE G. PINTO DIRECTOR OF UTILITY SERVICES PREPARED JAMES D. CHA,421iot'IL AND STAFFED MANAGER OF A86MMENT PROJECTS BY: DEPAR'T'MENT OF UTILITY SERVICES SUBJECT: WATER SERVICE TO 102ND TERRACE AND 99TH WAY INDIAN RIVER COUNTY PROJECT NO. UW -92 -35 -DS RESOLUTIONS I AND II BACKGROUND On August 4, 1992, the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County unanimously authorized staff to proceed with engineering for the design of the extension of utility lines on C.R. 512 from the Sebastian Middle School to I-95 to be funded through impact fees, and the design of utility lines for 102nd Terrace to be funded by assessment. Design service is under way, and we are ready to, begin the assessment process associated with this project. (See attached agenda item and minutes.) ANALYSIS Attached are Resolutions I and II for the assessment project. Eleven properties will -benefit from the service on 102nd Terrace and 99th Way. This project is to be paid through the assessment of 71 properties benefitting along the proposed water line route. In the interim, financing will be through the use of impact fee funds. The total estimated construction cost, including engineering and administration of the project, is $165,810.00, which is the amount to be assessed. The projected cost per square foot is $0.037390. The attached map displays the area to benefit from the assessment project. A portion of the construction of this project shall be through a developer's agreement with Macho Products, which will be submitted to the Board of County Commissioners for approval in March 1993. The staff of the Department of Utility Services recommends that the Board of County Commissioners approve the attached resolutions and set the public hearing date. ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED by Commissioner Eggert, the Board unanimously adopted Resolution 93-59, providing for water main extension to 102nd Terrace and 99th way, etc. ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED by Commissioner Eggert, the Board unanimously adopted Resolution 93-60, setting a time and place at which the owners of properties located generally in the area of 102nd Terrace and 99th Way may appear before the Board of County Commissioners, etc. 72 MAR -91993 BOOK 88 PAGE 1Q7.8 Providing (First Reso.) RESOLUTION NO. 93- 59 _ BOOK 88 PAfF1071 -1 A RESOLUTION OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, PROVIDING FOR WATER MAIN EXTENSION TO 102ND TERRACE AND 99TH WAY; PROVIDING THE TOTAL ESTIMATED COST, METHOD OF PAYMENT OF ASSESSMENTS, NUMBER OF ANNUAL INSTALLMENTS, AND LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF THE AREA SPECIFICALLY SERVED. WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County has determined that the improvements herein described are necessary to promote the public welfare of the county and has determined to defray the cost thereof by special assessments against certain properties to be serviced by a water main extension to 102nd Terrace and 99th Way, hereinafter referred to as Project No. UW -92 -35 -DS; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, as follows: 1. The County does hereby determine that a water main extension shall be installed to provide service for 11 properties, which are located generally as described above, and the cost thereof shall be specially assessed in accordance with the provisions of Sections 206.01 through 206.09 of the Code of Indian River County. 2. The total estimated project assessment cost of the above-described improvements is shown to be $165,810.00 or $0.037390 per square foot to be paid by the property specially benefited as shown on the assessment plat on file with the Department of Utility Services. 3. A special assessment in the amount of $0.037390 per square foot shall be assessed against each of the properties designated on the assessment plat. This assessment may be raised or lowered by action of the Board of County Commissioners after the public `hearing, at the same meeting, as required by the referenced County Code. 4. The special assessments shall be due and payable and may be paid in full within 90 days after the date of the resolution of the Board with respect to credits against the special assessments after completion of the improvements (the "Credit Date") without interest. IFN If not paid in full, the special assessments may be paid in ten equal yearly installments of principal plus interest. If not paid when due, there shall be added a penalty of 1-1/2% of the principal not paid when due. The unpaid balance of the special assessments shall bear interest at a rate of 8% from the Credit Date until paid. 5. There is presently on file with the Department of Utility Services a plat showing the area to be assessed, plans and specifications, and an estimate of the cost of the proposed improvements. All of these are open to inspection by the public at the Department of Utility Services. 6. An assessment roll with respect to the special assessments shall promptly be prepared in connection with the special assessments. 7. Upon the adoption of this resolution, the Indian River County Utility Services Department shall cause this resolution (along with a map showing the areas to be served) to be published at least one time in the Vero Beach Press Journal before the public hearing required by Section 206.04. The resolution was moved for adoption by Commissioner Adams , and the motion was seconded by Commissioner Eggert 1 and, upon being put to a vote, the vote was as follows: Chairman Richard N. Bird Aye Vice Chairman John W. Tippin Aye Commissioner Carolyn R. Eggert Aye Commissioner Fran B. Adams Aye Commissioner Kenneth R. Macht Aye The Chairman thereupon declared the resolution duly passed and adopted this 9th day of March, 1993. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA Attest: Y Richard N. Bird Jeffrey K. Barton, Cler ` Chairman Indian Rive Cn AOProved Admin Legai j Euag-a utpt. J, 74 Risk Mgr, v Rl� ate MA ®91993 s� K c',qJ04 J Time and Place (Second Reso.) RESOLUTION NO. 93 _.O BOOK 88 PAGE 10 1 A RESOLUTION OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, SETTING A TIME AND PLACE AT WHICH THE OWNERS OF PROPERTIES LOCATED GENERALLY IN THE AREA OF 102ND TERRACE AND 99TH WAY AND OTHER INTERESTED PERSONS, MAY APPEAR BEFORE THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS AND BE HEARD AS TO THE PROPRIETY AND ADVISABILITY OF CONSTRUCTING A WATER MAIN, AS TO THE COST THEREOF, AS TO THE MANNER OF PAYMENT THEREFOR, AND AS TO THE AMOUNT THEREOF TO BE SPECIALLY ASSESSED AGAINST EACH PROPERTY BENEFITED THEREBY. WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County has, by Resolution No. 93_59 , determined that it is necessary for the public welfare of the citizens of the county, and particularly as to those living, working, and owning property within the area described hereafter, that a waterline be installed to serve 11 properties hereinafter described; and WHEREAS, it has been determined that the cost to be specially assessed with respect thereto shall be $0.037390 per square foot; and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners has caused an assessment roll to be completed and filed with the Clerk to the Board; and WHEREAS, Section 206.06, Indian River County Code, requires that the Board of County Commissioners shall fix a time and place at which the owners of the properties to be assessed or any other persons interested therein may appear before the Board of County Commissioners and be heard as to the propriety and advisability of constructing such water main extension, as to the cost thereof, as to the manner of payment therefor, and as to the amount thereof to be assessed against each property benefited thereby, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, as follows: I. The County Commission shall meet at the County Commission Chambers in the County Administration Building at the hour of 9:05 a.m. on Tuesday, April 27, 1993, at which time the owners of the properties to be assessed and any other interested persons may appear before said Commission and be heard in regard thereto. The area to be improved and the properties -to be specially benefited are more Particularly described upon the assessment plat and the assessment roll with regard to the special assessments. 75 2. All persons interested in the construction of said improvements and the special assessments against the properties to be specially benefited may review the assessment plat showing the area to be assessed, the assessment roll, the plans and specifications for said improvements, and an estimate of the cost thereof at the office of the Department of Utility Services any week day from 8:30 a.m. until 5:00 p.m. 3. Notice of the time and place of this public hearing shall•be given by two publications in the Press Journal Newspaper one week apart. The last publication shall be at least one week prior to the date of the hearing. The Indian River County Department of Utility Services shall give the owner of each property to be specially assessed at least ten days notice in writing of such time and place, which shall be served by mailing a copy of such notice to each of such property owners at his last known address. The resolution was moved for adoption by Commissioner Adams , and the motion was seconded by Commissioner _Eggert , and, upon being put to a vote, the vote was as follows: Chairman Richard N. Bird Aye Vice chairman John W. Tippin Aye Commissioner Carolyn K. Eggert Aye Commissioner Fran B. Adams Aye Commissioner Kenneth R. Macht Aye The Chairman thereupon declared the resolution duly passed and adopted this 9th day of March, 1993. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA Attest: -- -_ By Richard N. Bird Jeffrey K-. Barton, Clirk Chairman Attachment: ASSESSMENT ROLL 76 indim Rives Ca Approved Dais Admin Legal i - , Budget Dept. a a(o Risk Mgr, BOOK 88 ["KH 108 � MAR - 9X993 ROOK 88 Pm,; 08 " WASTEWATER SERVICE TO 102ND TERRACE AND 99TH WAY RESOLUTIONS I AND II The Board reviewed the following memo dated 2/26/93: DATE: FEBRUARY 26, 1993 TO: JAMES E. CHANDLER COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR FROM: TERRANCE G. PINTO DIRECTOR OF UTILI �SE VICES PREPARED JAMES D. CHAS 41'& AND STAFFED MANAGER OF AS PROJECTS BY: DEPARTMENT OF UTILITY SERVICES SUBJECT: WASTEWATER SERVICE TO 102ND TERRACE AND 99TH WAY INDIAN RIVER COUNTY PROJECT NO. IIS -92 -36 -CS RESOLUTIONS I AND II BACKGROUND On August 4, 1992, the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County unanimously authorized staff to proceed with engineering for the design of the extension of utility lines on C.R. 512 from the Sebastian Middle School to I-95 to be funded through impact fees, and the design of utility lines for 102nd Terrace to be funded by assessment. Design service is under way, and we are ready to begin the assessment process associated with this project. (See attached agenda item and minutes.) ANALYSIS Attached are Resolutions I and II for the assessment project. Eleven properties will benefit from the service on 102nd Terrace and 99th Way. This project is to be. paid through the assessment of properties benefitting along the proposed wastewater line route. In the interim, financing will be through the use of impact fee funds. The total estimated construction cost, including engineering and administration of the project, is $334,194.00. However, the amount the property owners will be assessed, excluding the costs of a regional lift station and force main associated with this project, is $223,170.00. The projected cost per square foot is $0.050324. The attached map displays the area to benefit from the assessment project. (Attached is a breakdown of costs for the nonassessed portion). A portion of the construction of this project shall be through a developer's agreement with Macho Products, which will be submitted to the Board of County Commissioners for approval in March 1993. RECOMMENDAT ON The staff of the Department of Utility Services recommends that the Board of County Commissioners approve the attached resolutions and set the public hearing date. rye WASTEWATER SERVICE TO 102ND TERRACE AND 99TH WAY Nonassessed Cost covered by impact fees as regional system Construction Costs - Lift Station Force Main 10% Engineering 10% Contingency Portion to be assessed to Property Owners Construction - Collection System 10% Engineering 10% Contingency Administrative Total estimated construction cost, including engineering and administration $60,000.00 32.520.00 $92,520.00 9,252.00 9.252.00 $111,024.00 $184,600.00 18,460.00 18,460.00 1.650.00 $223,170.00 $334,194.00 ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by Commissioner Adams, the Board unanimously adopted Resolution 93-61, providing for wastewater force main extension to 102nd Terrace and 99th Way; etc. ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by Commissioner Adams, the Board unanimously adopted Resolution 93-62, setting a time and place at which the owners of properties located generally in the area of 102nd Terrace and 99th Way may appear before the Board of County Commissioners, etc. Vf7 900K FAGE 1081 BAR - 9 1993 Providing (First Reso.) RESOLUTION NO. 93- 61 Boy 88 PnF it A RESOLUTION OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, PROVIDING FOR WASTEWATER FORCE MAIN EXTENSION TO 102ND TERRACE AND 99TH WAY/ PROVIDING THE TOTAL ESTIMATED COST, METHOD OF PAYMENT OF ASSESSMENTS, NUMBER OF ANNUAL INSTALLMENTS, AND LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF THE AREA SPECIFICALLY SERVED. WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County has determined that the improvements herein described are necessary to Promote the public welfare of the county and has determined to defray the cost thereof by special assessments against certain properties to be serviced by a wastewater force main extension to 102nd Terrace and 99th Way, hereinafter referred to as Project No. US -92 -36 -DS; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, as follows: 1. The County does hereby determine that a wastewater force main extension shall be installed to provide service for 11 properties, which are located generally as described above, and the cost thereof shall be specially assessed in accordance with the provisions of Sections 206.01 through 206.09 of the Code of Indian River County. 2. The total estimated project assessment cost of the above-described improvements is shown to be $223,170.00 or $0.050324 per square foot to be paid by the property specially benefited as shown on the assessment plat on file with the Department of Utility Services. 3. A special assessment in the amount of $0.050324 per square foot shall be assessed against each of the properties designated on the assessment plat. This assessment may be raised or lowered by action of the Board of County Commissioners after the public hearing, at the same meeting, as required by the referenced County Code. 4. The special assessments shall be due and payable and may be paid in full within 90 days after the date of the resolution of the Board with respect to credits against the special assessments after completion of the improvements (the "Credit Date") without interest. VKI If not paid in full, the special assessments may be paid in ten equal yearly installments of principal plus interest. If not paid when due, there shall be added a penalty of 1-1/2% of the principal not paid when due. The unpaid balance of the special assessments shall bear interest at a rate of 8% from the Credit Date until paid. 5. There is presently on file with the Department of Utility Services a plat showing the area to be assessed, plans and specifications, and an estimate of the cost of the proposed improvements. All of these are open to inspection by the public at the Department of Utility Services. 6. An assessment roll with -respect to the special assessments shall promptly be prepared in connection with the special assessments. 7. Upon the adoption of this resolution, the Indian River County Utility services Department shall cause this resolution (along with a map showing the areas to be served) to be published at least one time in the Vero. Beach Press Journal before the public hearing required by Section 206.04. The resolution was moved for adoption by Commissioner Eggert , and the motion was seconded by Commissioner Adams , and, upon being put to a vote, the vote was as follows: Chairman Richard N. Bird Aye Vice Chairman John W: Tippin Aye Commissioner Carolyn K. Eggert Aye Commissioner Fran B. Adams Aye Commissioner Kenneth R. Macht Aye The Chairman thereupon declared the resolution duly passed and adopted this 9th day of March, 1993. Attest: Jeffrey Barton, Cleik `-" A R - 9 " r' BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA ByL/!il•/ 1 Richard N. Bird Chairman 80 BOOK 88 vnu 108'g F' MAR -,Q imi Time and Place (Second Reso.) RESOLUTION NO. 93-_6 2 BOOK 88 ul'lF I OS 7 A RESOLUTION OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, SETTING A TIME AND PLACE AT WHICH THE OWNERS OF PROPERTIES LOCATED GENERALLY IN THE AREA OF 102ND TERRACE AND 99TH WAY AND OTHER INTERESTED PERSONS, MAY APPEAR BEFORE THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS AND BE HEARD AS TO THE PROPRIETY AND ADVISABILITY OF CONSTRUCTING A WASTEWATER FORCE MAIN EXTENSION, AS TO THE COST THEREOF, AS TO THE MANNER OF PAYMENT THEREFOR, AND AS TO THE AMOUNT THEREOF TO BE SPECIALLY ASSESSED AGAINST EACH PROPERTY BENEFITED THEREBY. WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County has, by Resolution No. 93-61' , determined that it is necessary for the Public welfare of the citizens of the county, and particularly as to those living, working, and owning property within the area described hereafter, that a wastewater force main be installed to serve 11 properties hereinafter described; and WHEREAS, it has been determined that the cost to be specially assessed with respect thereto shall be $0.050324 per square foot; and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners has caused an assessment roll to be completed and filed with the Clerk to the Board; and WHEREAS, Section 206.06, Indian River County Code, requires that the Board of County Commissioners shall fix a time and place at which the owners of the properties to be assessed or any other persons interested therein may appear before the Board of County Commissioners and be heard as to the propriety and advisability of constructing such wastewater force main extension, as to the cost thereof, as to the manner of payment therefor, and as to the amount thereof to be assessed against each property benefited thereby, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, as follows: 1. The County Commission shall meet at the County Commission Chambers in the County Administration Building at the hour of 9:05 a.m. on Tuesday, April 27, 1993, at which time the owners of the properties to be assessed and any other interested persons may appear before said Commission and be heard in regard thereto. The area to be improved and the properties to be specially benefited are more 81 particularly described upon the assessment plat and the assessment roll with regard to the special assessments. 2. All persons interested in the construction of said improvements and the special assessments against the properties to be specially benefited may review the assessment plat showing the area to be assessed, the assessment roll, the plans and specifications for said improvements, and an estimate of the cost thereof at the office of the Department of Utility Services any week day from 8:30 a.m. until 5:00 p.m. 3. Notice of the time and place of this public hearing shall - be given by two publications in the Press Journal Newspaper -one week apart. The last publication shall be at least one week prior to the date of the hearing.- The Indian River County Department of Utility Services shall give the owner of each property to be specially assessed at least ten days notice in writing of such time and place, which shall be served by mailing a copy of such notice to each of such property owners at his last known address. The resolution was moved for adoption by Commissioner l:9'prt , and the motion was seconded by Commissioner Adams , and, upon being put to a vote, the vote was as follows: Chairman Richard N. Bird Aye Vice Chairman John W. Tippin Aye Commissioner Carolyn K. Eggert Aye Commissioner Fran B. Adams Aye Commissioner Kenneth R. Macht Aye The Chairman thereupon declared the resolution duly passed and adopted this 9th day of March, 1993. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA Attests -. By Richard N. Bird Jeffrey K4 Barton Clerk /� n Chairman Attachment: ASSESSMENT ROLL 82 MAR - 9 199 eooK rA,;;c top -g BOOK 88 PnF 108 APPOINTMENT TO FILL EXECUTIVE AIDE POSITION Chairman Bird announced that Liz Forlani has submitted her letter of resignation to the Board of County Commissioners and the Board is accepting her resignation with regret and commendation on her many years of dedicated service and loyalty. ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by Commissioner Adams, the Board unanimously accepted with regret the resignation of Executive Aide Liz Forlani and wished her Godspeed in her retirement. Chairman Bird noted that Mrs. Forlani also submitted a recommendation as to the best way to handle her replacement, but he felt that with the new members of the Board perhaps we should look at other counties and how they work through the Clerk's Office. He asked Personnel Director Jack Price to check on how St. Lucie County and Martin County do this, but what we got back is a comparison of apples and oranges. Presently, the County Administrator and his staff handles the agenda preparation, and we have three Clerk to the Board employees who take care of recording the minutes of the Board of County Commission meetings, filing ordinances, resolutions, and contracts. Chairman Bird advised that he asked Personnel to put together some financial figures that would give us an idea of what we presently are spending in our secretarial support to the BCC: 83 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . To: Richard Bird, Chairman Board of County Commissioners Thru: James Chandler,f0 County Administrat From: Jack Price, Personne,91L Date: March 4, 1993 Sub: BCC Support Staff . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . As requested, the following information is relative to the support staff and services for the Martin County and St. Lucie County commissions. MARTIN COUNTY The ClerkIs office provides 3 nonexempt employees, 2 full-time and 1 part-time, from the commission records unit to take minutes of BCC meetings, record same, and provide an historical library of these materials. The County Administrator has an Executive Assistant who supervises 2 nonexempt employees working as Agenda Coordinators and 3 nonexempt employees working as Secretaries to the Commissioners by performing all clerical work, some public contact and minor project follow up. ST. LUCIE COUNTY The Clerk's office provides 1 nonexempt employee whose duty is to take minutes of BCC meetings, record .*same, and provide an historical library of these materials. The County Commissioners each have 1 exempt employee working as an Executive Assistant whose duties range from performing all clerical work, public contact, major project follow up both inside the administration and outside, and serving however the Commissioner to whom they are assigned believe is appropriate. Their process is such that very little support staff time is required for the agenda preparation. Aside from a review and approval of potential agenda items by the County Administrator, his secretary prepares the cover list and distributes the agenda sets. 84 Nm.. 88 F•D,r. 1O Q ROOK 88 Pb1,: I t -7 AS --OF 2-93 BOARD OF •COMMISSIONERS-OFFICE11 1 1 85 Wane Information Budgeted for FY 1993 Pay Grade Executive Aide3 mum NA -ml -m -u -n incumbent $250179 $38,335 $38,335 Wage to BCC 38,335 (Forlani) FICA 6.2% 2,377 Medica. 1.45% 556 Pensio 17.75% 6,804 Health D$44O 5,280 W.Comp .78% 299 Life $.36/K 168 Total $ 53, 819 Administrative Assistant II 17,319 24,534 20,010 Wage 20 410 (Caldwell) • FICA 6.2% 1,265 Medica. 1.45% 296 Pensio 17.75$ 3,623 Health D$44O 5,280 WComp .78% 159 Life $.36/K 91 Total $ 31,124 Administrative Assistant II 17,319 24,534 23,555 Wage 240,026 (Masi) FICA 6.2� 1,490 Medica. 1.45% 348 Pensio 17.75% 4,265 Health S$2O7 2,484 W.Comp .78% 187 Life $.36/K 108 Total $ 320,908 Administrative Secretary II 19,268 27,296 27,296 Wage 270,296 (White) FICA 6.2$ 1,692 Medica. 1.45% 396 Pensio 17.75% 4,845 Health S$2O7 2,484 W.Comp .78% 213 Life $.36/K 121 ` Total $ 37,047 el pg, 85 Executive Aide to BCC (White) Administrative Assistant II (Caldwell) Administrative Assistant II (New) Administrative Secretary II (Masi) Secretary II (New) ADDITIONAL Pay Grade MinimumN-a-XI-m-UM Incumbent $25,179 $38,335 $28,661 17,319 24,534 20,010 17,319 24,534 17,319 19,268 27,296 24,733 14,023 19,888 14,023 86 Budgeted for FY 1993 Wage 28,661 FICA 6.2% 1,777 Medica. 1.45% 416 Pensio 17.75% 5,087 Health S$207 2,484 W.Comp .78% 224 Life $.36/K 125 Total $ 38,774 Wage 20,410 FICA 6.2% 1,265 Medica. 1.45% 296 Pensio 17.75% 3,623 Health D$440 5,280 W.Comp .78% 159 Life $.36/K 91 Total $ 31,124 Wage 17,319 FICA 6.2% 1,074 Medica. 1.45% 251 Pensio 17.75% 3,074 Health D$440 5,280 W.Comp .78% 135 Life $.36/K 78 Total $27,211 Wage 24,733 FICA 6.2% 1,533 Medica. 1.45% 359 Pensio 17.75% 4,390 Health S$207 2,484 W.Comp .78% 193 Life $.36/K 108 Total $33j800 Wage 14,023 FICA 6.2% 869 Medica. 1.45% 203 Pensio 17.75% 2,489 Health S$207 21484 W.Comp .78% 109 Life $.36/K 65 Total $ 20,242 MAR ® 91993 aoor 1-0 BOOK 88 P ;F -10 Chairman Bird stated that perhaps with Mrs. Forlani's resignation, it is an opportunity to consider whether we want the present structure of the BCC Office to continue or whether we want to restructure with some cost savings. He was concerned that the Clerk to the Board has one supervisor over two employees and the BCC Office has one supervisor over three employees, and he felt that some restructuring might be in order at this time. He talked to Jeff Barton, Clerk of the Circuit Court, about the possibility of restructuring, and Mr. Barton feels there might be something that can be gained by combining the two offices. Chairman Bird just felt this was something the Board would like to consider at this time and to perhaps work with other alternatives and with Administrator Chandler to see if there is some restructuring that could be done. Commissioner Eggert advised that Mr. Barton had talked to her about the matter and she felt at the time it might be something to consider. However, after giving it careful consideration, she did not think it was a good idea. She felt very strongly against all the secretaries being moved into the Clerk's Office and doing both the minutes of the Commission meetings and the various committees. She was all for reducing costs, but felt it would be very difficult to have people working for her who report to someone else. While she was very supportive of the checks and balances of the Deputy Clerks taking the BCC meetings, she felt it would be a mistake not to have County Commission secretaries doing county work. Commissioner Eggert felt that we have a good arrangement right now. Commissioner Adams agreed and felt very comfortable in maintaining the present structuring. Commissioner Macht felt somewhat the same, but wanted to have some time to talk with Mr. Barton to see what ideas he has about the possible restructuring. Chairman Bird pointed out that Mrs. Forlani's resignation is effective April 30, which is one of the reasons he brought this matter to the Board today. He didn't think the position has been advertised. as yet, and he understood that it must be posted internally. He suggested that we put this off for one week and make a decision at that time, and the Board indicated their agreement. REPORT ON TREASURE COAST LEGISLATIVE MEETING IN TALLAHASSEE Chairman Bird reported that during his attendance of the Treasure Coast Legislative Meeting in Tallahassee last week, he took a lot of notes and attended a lot of conferences. However, he felt it is very probable that information has all changed since, 87 M especially with regard to health care and Workers' Compensation. Discussions were held on software packages, the consolidation of DER and DNR, etc. The people he went with to Tallahassee were mostly related to construction, development, the Council of 100, and the Chamber of Commerce. In talking about the Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council, there is an unanimous feeling that the TCRPC is a very large obstacle in trying to promote industrial development in this area. Potential developers are steering away from this area because of the permitting requirements of the TCRPC, and it is felt that if we cannot do away completely with the TCRPC, we certainly need to change some attitudes, responsibilities, and dilute their authority. During budget discussions, Chairman Bird emphasized how shocked he had been to learn that it is estimated that 820 of the State's $34 -billion budget will go to education and HRS. RESOLUTION REGARDING TREASURE COAST COUNCIL Commissioner Tippin explained that the proposed resolution is primarily a housekeeping matter. The Treasure Coast Council on Governments was formed in the mid 1980s and was dormant for a while, but has gotten active again in the last year or so with Commissioner Eggert as the chairperson. Even the name has been changed; it used to be called Tri -County. The maximum assessment is $500 a year, but they won't even have a budget for another month. Commissioner Adams asked if the intent is to have a staff, and Commissioner Tippin advised that it will be a grass roots effort with no staff. Commissioner Macht felt it is important to maintain and strengthen this group in light of the fact that we are .trying along with others to dismantle the TCRPC. Commissioner Adams noticed that we are missing the Town of Orchid and the City of Fellsmere, and Commissioner Tippin explained that sometime back the Council wanted to get resolutions from all the entities and it seems that some participants didn't pass a resolution. 88 BAR m BOOK 88 PA11E O I I MAR ® (4.�� Qj' BOOK 88 NUI -0967 V' CG+�ed� ON MOTION by Commissioner Macht, SECONDED by Commissioner Eggert, the Board unanimously adopted Resolution 93-63, a joint resolution by and between the City of Fort Pierce, The City of Port St. Lucie, the City of Stuart, The City of Vero Bach, the City of Sebastian, Florida, etc. ,rim cx AMOCCUM RESOLUTION 937 -- A 3 -- A JOINT RESOLUTION BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF FORT PIERCE, THE CITY OF PORT ST. LUCIE, THE CITY OF STUART, THE CITY OF VERO BEACH, THE CITY OF SEBASTIAN, • FLORIDA MUNICIPAL CORPORATIONS; INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, MARTIN COUNTY, OKEECHOBEE COUNTY, AND ST. LUCIE COUNTY, SUBDIVISIONS OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA; ADOPTING AN AMENDMENT TO THE RESOLUTION UNDER WHICH A COUNCIL OF LOCAL GOVERNMENTS WAS FORMED; CHANGING THE NAME OF THE COUNCIL TO THE TREASURE COAST COUNCIL OF LOCAL GOVERNMENTS; PROVIDING FOR THE MEMBERSHIP, POWERS, AND ADMINISTRATION OF SUCH COUNCIL; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the residents of the area surrounding and proximate to the Treasure Coast are served by nine separate governmental entities, i.e.,: the municipalities of Fort Pierce, Port St. Lucie, Sebastian, Stuart, and Vero Beach; and the Counties of Indian River, Martin, Okeechobee,' -and St. Lucie, (hereinafter referred to as'"Governments"); and WHEREAS, the Governments have many interrelating problems and needs which would best be resolved on a cooperative community basis, r#ther than by separate action, thus reducing duplication of costs and services; and WHEREAS, Section 163.02 of the Florida Statutes provides for the creation of voluntary councils of local county and municipal public officials for the cooperative resolution of area and community problems; and 89 w WHEREAS, such an organization was established by resolution ...adopted by Joint Resolution Number 87-63 adopted July 7, 1987, by Indian River County; Joint Resolution -Number 87-811 adopted August 11, 1987, by Martin County; Joint Resolution Number 87-112 adopted June 16, 1987, by St. Lucie County; Joint Resolution Number 87-104 adopted October 19, 1987, by the City of Fort Pierce; Joint Resolution Number 87-R58 adopted November 23, 1987, by the City of Port St. Lucie; Joint Resolution Number 57-86 adopted November 10, 1986, by the City of Stuart; and Joint Resolution Number 86-53 adopted October 21, 1986, by the City of Vero Beach. WHEREAS, the Okeechobee County joined the organization in 1989 by adoption of the Governments of an amendment to the agreement establishing the Tri -County Council of Local Governments; and WHEREAS, the City of Sebastian elected to join the Council in 1992 by action of the City Commission. NOW THEREFORE, "BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY; THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF MARTIN COUNTY; THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY, AND THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF OKEECHOBEE COUNTY; THE CITY COMMISSION OF FORT PIERCE; THE CITY COMMISSION OF PORT ST. LUCIE; THE CITY COMMISSION OF STUART; THE CITY COMMISSION OF SEBASTIAN, AND THE CITY COUNCIL OF VERO BEACH; THAT: Section 1 - Ratification and Expansion. The Governments hereby ratify the establishment of a Council ...,of their respective governments in accordance with Section 163.02, F.S. and the terms of this Joint Resolution. Section 2 - name Chance. The name of the Council, formerly "The Tri -County Council of Local Governments," is hereby amended to the "Treasure Coast Council of Local Governments," (hereinafter referred to as "the Council"). 90 BooK 88 PAGF1006 MAR ® 91993 BOOK 88 PAGF 09 Section 3 - R@presentation on Council. The representative from each member local government shall be the elected chief executive of said local government or, if such government does not have an elected chief executive, a member of its governing body chosen as appointed by such body to be its representative. In the event the designated representative is unable to serve, the local government shall select an alternate member from its elected legislative body. Each member, through its duly authorized representative, shall have one vote. Any member government may withdraw from the Council and General Assembly upon sixty (60) days notice to the Council. Section 4 —Representation on General Assembl . All elected city and county officials from the Governments shall be members of the General Assembly. The General Assembly shall meet at least annually and shall elect the Chairman, Vice Chairman, and Treasurer of the Council. Section 5 - Purposes. The purpose of the Council shall be to study such area -wide governmental problems as it deems appropriate, including but not limited to matters affecting health, safety, welfare, education, economic conditions, and area development; to promote cooperative arrangements and coordinate action among its members; and to make recommendations for review and action to the members and other public agencies that perform local functions and services within the area. Section - Finance and Administration. (a) The Council may accept funds, grants, gifts, and services from the State of Florida, from any other governmental unit whether participating in the Council or not, from the government of the United States, and from private and civic sources. 91 •(b) Each representative shall have the duty to regularly report Council matters to the representative's member government. The Council shall make an annual public report of its activities to each of the member local governments and. shall have its accounts audited annually. (c) That each government does hereby authorize the payment of an annual assessment to the Council not to exceed $500.00 per year. (d) That each government shall separately consider, and if approved, authorize the payment of any special assessments recommended by the Council. ..Section 7 - Bylaws. The Council shall adopt bylaws designating the officers of the Council and providing for the conduct of its business. Section 8 - Amendment. This resolution and the agreements thereby affected may only be amended by a joint resolution of the governing bodies of all members. Section 9 - Effective Date. This resolution shall become effective upon final passage by each of the parties hereto. PASSED AND ADOPTED by Resolution Number 93-63 9th day of March , 1993. this ATTEST: Clerk 92 MAR - 9 1998 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA Chairman RICHARD N. BIRD BOCK 88 FAir®� ,� MAR - 9 1 PP, BOOK 88 Fac, 1004 LETTER OF SUPPORT FOR APPOINTMENT OF ORNAMENTAL HORTI- CULTURAL/AGRICULTURE EXTENSION AGENT The Board reviewed the following memo dated 3/5/93: DATE: MARCH 5, 1993 TO: HONORABLE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS THRU: JAMES E. CHANDLER COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR FROM: H.T. "SONNY" DEAN, DIRECTOVko DEPARTMENT OF GENERAL SERVICES SUBJECT: AGRICULTURE EXTENSION AGENT In January of this year, Jack Hebb, County Agriculture Agent for Indian River County submitted his resignation effective in February. Upon receiving this notice staff set up a meeting with Dr. Maurice Cole, District Extension Director, University of Florida Cooperative Extension Service to discuss a replacement. Dr. Cole and I reviewed the record of calls for the County Extension Office and it is obvious that requests for ornamental horticulture type services far outnumber citrus type requests. Based on this data and the fact that Extension agents with a background in citrus are not readily available, Dr. Cole has made a recommendation to satisfy both demands in our County. This a two prong recommendation in that one, we change the present job description and hire a County Agent with a background in ornamental horticulture and two, enter into a agreement to share a "tri -county" citrus agent with equal salary contributions from Okeechobee and St. Lucie Counties. This program would increase our annual budget by an estimated cost of $7,500.00. Staff concurs with Dr. Cole's recommendation in that we will be addressing the needs of all the various citizens and industries of our County by offering them expertise in their particular area of concern. Depending on the time it takes to hire a person with background in ornamental horticulture, the account budgeted for salary may or may not require an amendment prior to end of our fiscal year. Staff would request authorization to make that transfer, should it be required. HTD/eh Attachment (BCCLTR.MAR) 93 Commissioner Adams clarified that she is talking about replacing Jack Hebb who was a full-time agent here in Indian River County. In addition, it has been suggested ..by Dr. Cole of IFAS that we also might fund, at $7,500 a year, a part of that multi - county citrus agent in order to have him serve this county also. Her position is that it would be nice to have him, but she would hesitate to take that out of contingency funds to do that now. She would like to see us address that under our regular budget process. The contingency funds are there for emergency items and items that we consider of utmost importance. Chairman Bird asked if we would get the services of that individual if we didn't kick in the $7,500, but Commissioner Eggert pointed out that the ornamental/horticultural agent would have citrus knowledge. Administrator Chandler advised that we did budget a full - year's salary for the agricultural agent and, depending on the timing of when that position is filled, there might be some left over to put towards the $7,500. Commissioner Macht wondered why the Citrus League didn't fund the $7,500 itself since it is such a small amount, and Commissioner Eggert felt that was an interesting question. ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by Commissioner Tippin, the Board unanimously approved a letter of support recommending the immediate employment of an extension agent for Indian River County to replace Jack Hebb, stressing the need for this agent to be able to work with homeowners, commercial operations, administer pesticide training, run safety programs and serve other needs of the County; rejected at this time the IFAS's proposal for IRC to pay $7,500 toward a multi -county agent who would work with citrus growers, but suggested the IFAS make their request at budget time this summer. AGREEMENT IS ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD 94 BAR ® 9 1993 8,,0K 88 F-acc Jl 0 MAR ® BOOK 88 APPOINTMENT TO BEACH & SHORES PRESERVATION ADVISORY COMMITTEE The Board reviewed the following memo dated 3/3/93: Telephone: (407)567_M TO: . BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS FROM: FRAN ADAMS, COUNTY COMMISSIONER DATE: MARCH 3, 1993 RE; APPOINTMENT TO BEACH COMMITTEE Suncom Telephone: 224-1011 I recommend that Giovanna "Nina" Rappaport be appointed to the newly formed Beach Committee. She is a Marine Biology teacher at the Vero Beach Senior High School. I feel she will be an asset on this committee. ON MOTION by Commissioner Macht, SECONDED by Commissioner Eggert, the Board unanimously appointed Giovanna (Nina) Rappaport to the newly formed Beach & Shores Preservation Advisory Committee. REQUEST FOR INCREASED FUNDING - COUNCIL ON AGING. INC. /COMMUNITY COACH BUS STOP SIGNAGE The Board reviewed the following memo dated 3/3/93: ATO: James E. Chandler, County Administrator THROUGH: James W. Davis, P.E. Public Works Director FROM: Jeanne Breset Traffic Coordi or SUBJECT: Commissioner Carolyn Eggert's Request for Increased Funding - Indian River County Council on Aging, Inc./ Community Coach Bus Stop Signage DATE: March 3, 1993 DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS On October 20, 1992, The Board of County Commissioners approved a request from the Indian River Council on Aging, Inc. for $2,000.00 95 appropriation to purchase materials for signage for the Community Coach (Transportation for the Transportation Disadvantaged) bus stop signs. At that time 36 signs were fabricated and installed by Indian River County Traffic Engineering Division Personnel. Mr. Tom Fritz, Transportation Supervisor has proposed a larger route to incorporate more areas of the County, therefore requiring more signs. The total cost incurred to date and proposed is as follows: 10/20/92 Beginning Balance 11/92 36 signs (Material Only) 3/93 67 proposed signs (Material Only) 3/93 (Schedules & Blanks) +$2,000.00(appropriation) =$1,052.17 complete =$11783.54 not completed =$ 400.00 not completed -$1,235.71 SHORT To implement the proposed new route $835.71 is needed to purchase the materials for the signage. In addition to this, Mr. Fritz is requesting that the County appropriate $400.00 for the cost of the schedule that would be attached to each sign post. The schedule would be printed on a sticker that would then be placed on an aluminum blank. The County furnished the labor to fabricate and install the signs at no charge for the previous route. The total additional monies required is $1,235.71. ALTERNATIVES & ANALYSIS Alternative #1 - To approve an additional $1235.71 for the sign materials and install the signs at no charge along County Right -of - Way only. Alternative #2 - To deny the request and have the Council on Aging pay for the materials and install the signs themselves. REC—WRIENDATIONS & FUNDING Staff recommends approval of Alternative #1. Funding will be from general fund contingency. Commissioner Eggert asked the Board to approve an additional $1,235.71 for sign materials and the installation of the signs at no charge along County right-of-way only, with funding from general fund contingencies. Mr. Tom Fritz, transportation director of the Council on Aging, explained that their plans are to expand service to more places, specifically Fellsmere, and to increase the number of stops at pharmacies, grocery stores, etc. Service will reach deeper into the community. There are a number of people who called and asked if they could get one of the coaches to deliver them to the bus stop, so the Council is finding that they need to put more stops on their route. It still remains that they will be going to Gifford twice a week, getting up to north county once a week, and south county twice a week. 96 BOOK 8 8 NA;F 1102 MAR 91993 HOK 88 U 1103 Commissioner Eggert felt that something should be painted on the side of the vehicles to the effect that these coaches are available to all ages. She would like to see an effort made to take care of this misunderstanding that only senior citizens can ride these coaches. Mr. Fritz advised that there has been some effort made to get the message across. Signs on the side of the vehicles have been changed to "Community Coach" in 5 -inch letters, with "Courtesy of Council on Aging" beneath in 2 -inch letters. On the front of the bus it has 18 -inch letters saying "BUS." Commissioner Eggert felt that as long as "Council on Aging" remains on the vehicles, people will think they have to be seniors to ride the coach, and wished to see that taken care of. Mr. Fritz advised that they have approached a private foundation to see if this service can be continued for a year and are waiting for word on that now. ON MOTION by Commissioner Macht, SECONDED by Commissioner Eggert, the Board unanimously approved Alternative #1 as set out in the above memo. DIRECTION TO STAFF TO PREPARE A COUNTY -INITIATED REZONING OF W. E. GEOFFREY SUBDIVISION The Board reviewed the following memo dated 3/3/93: To: Board of County Commissioners From: Carolyn K. Eggert CSE Date: March 3, 1993 Re: W. E. Geoffrey Subdivision The loss of a house by fire has brought to our attention that when the land use map and zoning was last done, W. E. Geoffrey Subdivision was divided by U. S. 1 and those few houses on the west side were placed in commercial zoning creating a non -conforming use. They are located north -of the hospital and west of U.S. 1 near the point where Old Dixie comes into U. S. 1. At first the Community Development Department said the house couldn't be rebuilt and then suggested rezoning to OCR. Because of our actions in splitting this subdivision and because of the nature of the area, I request approval for a County -initiated rezoning to OCR to be done to solve the problem of the houses in this area. 97 Chairman Bird asked how the OCR zoning designation would affect values of properties in the area that are presently zoned commercial, and Community Development Director Robert Keating explained that OCR is the only zoning district that is allowed in the commercial land use designation in the Comp Plan that will permit residential and allows certain types of non-residential types of use such as office uses and limited types of commercial uses. The property in question is in the Geoffrey Subdivision but is on the west side of U.S. 11. Chairman Bird understood then that the County -initiated zoning would go through the public hearing process and that the Board will hear about it if it appears to be an unpopular zoning with the residents/property owners in the area. ON MOTION by Commissioner Macht, SECONDED by Commissioner Adams, the -Board unanimously authorized staff to prepare a county -initiated rezoning to OCR in Geoffrey Subdivision. EMERGENCY SERVICES DISTRICT MEETING The Chairman announced that immediately upon adjournment, the Board would reconvene sitting as the Board of Commissioners of the Emergency Services District. Those Minutes are being prepared separately. There being no further business, on Motion duly made, seconded and carried, the Board adjourned at 11:50 o'clock A. M. ATTEST: J. K. Barton, Clerk 98 6 Richard N. Bird, Chairman BOOK 8