The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1/4/1994� MINUTESTI'TACHED " BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA AGENDA REGULAR MEETING TUESDAY, JANUARY 4, 1994 9:00 A.M. - COUNTY COMMISSION CHAMBER COUNTY ADMINISTRATION BUILDING 1840 25TH STREET VERO BEACH, FLORIDA COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Richard N. Bird, Chairman- (Dist. S) John W. Tippin, Vice Chairman ( Dist. 4) Fran B. Adams ( Dist. 1) Carolyn K. Eggert ( Dist. 2) F Kenneth R. Macht ( Dist. 3 ) James E.- Chandler -County Administrator Charles P. Vitunac, County Attorney Jeffrey K. Barton, Clerk to the Board 9: 00 A. M. 1. CALL TO ORDER 2. A. INVOCATION - None B. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE - James E. Chandler 3. A. CHAIRMAN'S COMMENTS - RICHARD N. BIRD B. ELECTION OF CHAIRMAN C. ELECTION OF VICE CHAIRMAN 4. ADDITIONS TO THE AGENDA/EMERGENCY ITEMS 11.H.3. Structural failure at west regional wastewater plant 12. Annual resolution changing signatory for banks 13.B. Salary levels for County Administrator & County Attorney 13.E.1. Habitat for Humanity request 13.E.2. Gifford Cemetery 14.A. Emergency Services District 1994 Chairman & Vice Chairman 14.B. Solid Waste Disposal District 1994 Chairman and Vice Chairman 5. PROCLAMATION AND PRESENTATIONS None 6. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Regular Meeting of December 7, 1993 7. CONSENT AGENDA A. I.R. Farms Water Control Dist. Audit Report for year ended Sept. 30, 1993 (on file/Clerk's Ofc) B. County Tax Deed Applications ( memorandum dated November 9, 1993 ) C. Florida Contraband Forfeiture Semi -Annual Report ( letter dated December 9, 1993 ) D. Award Bid #4025 / Large Capacity Topdresser ( memorandum dated December 28, 1993 ) E. Award Bid #4033 / Five (5) Utility Trucks ( memorandum dated December 22, 1993 ) AN 41994 BooK � F. J -7 JAN 4 1994 BOOK 91 PAE'360 7. CONSENT AGENDA (cont'd. ): F. Award Bid #4031 / Dump Truck ( memorandum dated December 28, 1993 ) G. Award Bid #4047 / Informational Directory ( memorandum dated December 28, 1993 ) 8. CONSTITUTIONAL OFFICERS AND GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES Norte 9:05 a.m. 9. PUBLIC ITEMS A. PUBLIC DISCUSSION ITEMS None B. PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. Proposed Change (Minor Amendment) to the Harbor Town Center (Mall) DRI Development Order ( memorandum dated December 21, 1993 ) 2. Proposed Change (Minor Amendment) to the Countryside (formerly Village Green West & South) DRI Development Order ( memorandum dated December 21, 1993 ) 3. SWDD - Franchise and Recycling Contract Changes ( memorandum dated December 8, 1993 ) 10. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S MATTERS None 11. DEPARTMENTAL MATTERS A. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT None B. EMERGENCY SERVICES Approval of Additional Telephone Device for the Deaf (TDD) - Associated Equip. for E911 Public Safety Answering Points and the County Emergency Operations Center ( memorandum dated December 17, 1993 ) C. GENERAL SERVICES Indoor Air Quality - County Administration Bldg. ( memorandum dated December 27, 1993 ) D. LEISURE SERVICES None E. OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET None 11. DEPARTMENTAL MATTERS (cont'd. ): F. PERSONNEL Employee Health Care Plan Consultant (memorandum dated December 28, 1993) G. PUBLIC WORKS 1. RFP - Murphy Deed Reservations Along County Roads ( memorandum dated December 17, 1993 ) 2. Request for Grading 106th Ave. S 105th Ave. in Vero Lake Estates ( memorandum dated December 17, 1993 ) 3. Final Payment - Vero Lake Estates Drainage Study (memorandum- dated December 27, 19931 , 4. Professional Engineering Services Agreement 4th St Widening Project from West of US #1 to 500' West of Old Dixie Highway ( memorandum dated December 27; 1993) }. H. UTILITIES 1. Fire Hydrant Relocation - C.R. 512, IRC Bid No. 4007 ( memorandum dated December 20, 1993 ) 2. Removal of 200,000 Gallon Ground Storage Tank at Vero Beach Highlands ( memorandum dated December 16, 1993) 12. COUNTY ATTORNEY None 13. COMMISSIONERS ITEMS A. COMMITTEE APPOINTMENTS/REAPPOINTMENTS ( memorandum dated December 27, 1993 B. CHAIRMAN RICHARD N. BIRD C. VICE CHAIRMAN JOHN W. TIPPIN D. COMMISSIONER FRAN B. ADAMS E. COMMISSIONER CAROLYN K. EGGERT JAN 4 1994 . BOOK 91 PnE .361 BOOK 91 Far. ;352 -7 13. COMMISSIONERS ITEMS (cont'd. ): F. COMMISSIONER KENNETH R. MRCHT Joint Meeting Between Children's Services Advisory Committee Members, Board of County Commission, and School Board ( memorandum dated December 27, 1993 ) 14. SPECIAL DISTRICTS A. EMERGENCY SERVICES DISTRICT None B. SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL DISTRICT None: 15. ADJOURNMENT ANYONE WHO MAY WISH TO APPEAL ANY DECISION WHICH MAY BE MADE AT THIS MEETING WILL NEED TO ENSURE THAT A VERBATIM RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS IS MADE WHICH INCLUDES THE TESTIMONY AND EVIDENCE UPON WHICH THE APPEAL WILL BE BASED. ANYONE WHO NEEDS A SPECIAL ACCOMMODATION FOR THIS MEETING MAY CONTACT THE COUNTY'S AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT (ADA) COORDINATOR AT 567-8000 X 408 AT LEAST 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE OF MEETING. Tuesday, January 4, 1994 The Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida, met in Regular Session at the County Commission Chambers, 1840 25th Street, Vero Beach, Florida, on Tuesday, January 4, 1994, at 9:00 a.m. Present were Richard N. Bird, Chairman; John W. Tippin, Vice Chairman; Fran B. Adams; Carolyn K. Eggert; and Richard N. Bird. Also present were James E. Chandler, County Administrator; Charles P. Vitunac, County Attorney; and Diane Albin, Deputy Clerk. The Chairman called the meeting to order, and Administrator Chandler led the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag. CHAIRMAN"S COMMENTS - RICHARD N. BIRD Chairman Bird announced that the Board historically has elected a Chairman and Vice Chairman at the first meeting of each year. He stated that in the 13 years he has served as a Commissioner, the past year probably has been the most enjoyable. He related that he received excellent cooperation from the other Commissioners and from staff, which made hits job much easier. Chairman Bird predicted that history will reflect that 1993 was a good year for the County, during which many positive things happened. He felt that the County is in excellent hands with the present Commission, and he thanked the other Commissioners for giving him the opportunity to serve as Chairman during 1993. ELECTION OF CHAIRMAN AND VICE CHAIRMAN FOR 1994 Chairman Bird turned the meeting over to Attorney Vitunac for election of a new Chairman. Attorney Vitunac opened the floor for nominations for Chairman for 1994. Commissioner Eggert nominated Commissioner John W. Tippin. JAN .4 1994 BOOK 91 F'1Gr. `36 3 r JAN 41994 BOOK 91 FADE 364 -7 There being no other nominations, Attorney Vitunac closed the nominations, and Commissioner Tippin was elected Chairman of the Indian River County Board of County Commissioners for 1994 by acclamation. Commissioner Bird turned over the gavel to Chairman Tippin. Chairman Tippin thanked the Commissioners, and he promised to do his best to do a good job. He related that he considers it a privilege to serve on the Commission. He hoped to be able to do as good a job in 1994 as Commissioner Bird did in 1993, and he complimented Commissioner Bird on his ability to keep the meetings moving while at the same time making certain everyone was given an opportunity to express themselves on all sides of every issue. Commissioner Tippin then opened the floor for nominations for Vice Chairman for 1994. Commissioner Eggert nominated Commissioner Kenneth F. Macht. There being no other nominations, Chairman Tippin closed the nominations, and Commissioner Kenneth R. Macht was elected Vice Chairman of the Indian River County Board of County Commissioners for 1994 by acclamation. ADDITIONS TO THE AGENDA/EMERGENCY ITEMS Administrator Chandler requested the addition of Item 11.H.3., West Regional Wastewater Treatment Plant structural failure. Attorney Vitunac requested the addition of Item 12, annual resolution changing signatories for banks. Commissioner Bird requested the addition of Item 13.B., discussion of salary levels for Attorney Vitunac and Administrator Chandler. Commissioner Eggert requested the addition of Item 13.E.1., Habitat for Humanity request; and Item 13.E.2., discussion regarding abandoned cemetery in Gifford. Chairman Tippin requested the addition of Item 14.A., Special Meeting of the Emergency Services District; and Item 14.B., Special Meeting of the Solid Waste Disposal District. ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by Commissioner Adams, the Board unanimously added the above items to the Agenda. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Chairman Tippin asked if there were any additions or corrections to the Minutes of the Regular Meeting of December 7, 1993. There were none. 2 ON MOTION by Commissioner Bird, SECONDED by Commissioner Eggert, the Board approved the Minutes of the Regular Meeting of December 7, 1993, as written. CONSENT AGENDA A. Reports The Indian River Farms Water Control District Audit Report for the fiscal year ended September 30, 1993, was received and placed on file in the office of the Clerk to the Board. B. County Tax Deed Applications The Board reviewed the following memo dated November 9, 1993: TO: Board of County Commissioners XAA- k. f*� FROM: Lea R. Keller, CLA, County Attorney's Office THRU: Charles P. Vitunac, County Attorney DATE: November 9, 1993 RE: COUNTY TAX DEED APPLICATIONS The Board of County Commissioners at its meeting August 3, 1993, approved and authorized the County to file several tax deed applications with the Tax Collector on properties with outstanding tax certificates. As part of the process of transferring title to the .County, the . Clerk Ia Office has notified ..us that the sum of $2,804..02.is now due. REQUESTED ACTION: Staff recommends that the Board authorize the payment of the above funds to the Clerk of the Circuit Court. ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by Commissioner Adams, the Board unanimously authorized the payment of $2,804.02 to the Clerk of the Circuit Court, as recommended by staff. 3 JAN 4 1994 BOOK 91 Fr,UF r J A N 4 1994 BOOK C Florida Contraband Forfeiture Semi -Annual Report ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by Commissioner Adams, the Board unanimously accepted the Florida Contraband Forfeiture Semi -Annual report for the period ending September 30, 1993. REPORT IS ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD D Award Bid #4025 - Large Capacity Toydresser - Sandridge Golf Course The Board reviewed the following memo dated December 28, 1993: DATE: December 28, 1993 TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS THRU: James E. Chandler, County Administrator H.T. "Sonny" Dean, Directo General Services FROM: Fran Boynton Powell, Purchasing Manager SUBJ: Award Bid 14025/Large Capacity Topdresser Sandridge Golf Course BACKGROUND INFORO : Bid Opening Date: Advertising Dates: Specifications Mailed to: Replies: VENDOR Hector Turf Deerfield Beach, FL * RSI Holdings, Inc Ft Lauderdale, FL Zaun Equipment Lake Mary, FL October 27, 1993 Oct 14, 20, 1993 Twenty (20) Vendors Three (3) Vendors BID TOTAL $ 5,995.00 $ 6,775.00 $ 7,500.00 * Represents recommended award by Department. TOTAL AMOUNT OF BID $ 6,775.00 BUDGETED AMOUNT: $ 7,500.00 SOURCE OF FUNDS Golf Course Operations Other Machinery and Equipment Account RECOMMENDATION i Staff recommends that the bid be awarded to•RSI Holdings ;,,Inc, as the most responsive and responsible bidder meeting specifications as set forth in the Invitation to.Bid. (See attached memo) Low bidder's model does not meet our specifications in that it has a hydraulic drive instead of ground powered roller chain and gear drive. ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by Commissioner Adams, the Board unanimously awarded Bid #4025 to RSI Holdings, Inc., in the total amount of $6,775, as recommended by staff. 4 E. Award Bid #4033 - 5 Utility Trucks The Board reviewed the following memo dated December 22, 1993: DATE: December 22, 1993 TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS THRU: James E. Chandler, County Administrator H.T. "Sonny" Dean, Director ��// General Services ��"'"""]]] FROM: Fran Boynton Powell, Purchasing Manager SUBJ: Award Bid #4033/Five (5) Utility Trucks Utilities Department BACKGROUND INFORMATION: Bid Opening Date: December 15, 1993 Advertising Dates: December 1, 8, 1993 Specifications Mailed to: Twenty (20) Vendors Replies: Four (4) Vendors VENDOR ITEMS 1 - 4 BID TOTAL General GMC Truck 1 * $10,378.50 Tallahassee; FL 2 $16,035.00 3 $19,358.00 4 $19,118.00 Don Reid Ford 1 $10,498.00 Maitland, FL 2 * $14,589.00 3 * $17,688.00 4 * $17,499.00 Duvall Ford 1 $11,666.00 Jacksonville, FL 2 NO BID 3 NO BID 4 NO BID McInerny Ford 1 $13,648.00 Orlando, FL 2 $18,800.00 3 $21,950.00 .4 $21,950.00 '*Denotes Low Bidder and Recommended Award. Item 11 - Two 1993 1/2 Ton Pick -Up Trucks w/Gasoline Engines .stem #2 - One 93/94 One Ton Cab Truck w/Diesel Fuel Engine .'-Item - #3 - One* 93/94 One Ton Truck 14,500 SSB . GYWR Chassis Cab Model w/Trailer Towing Hook Equipment Item 14 - One 93/94 One Ton. Truck w/Trailer Towing Hook Equipment TOTAL AMOUNT OF BID $70,533.00 SOURCE OF FUNDS 471-219-536-066.42 - Water Utilities Automotive, 471-218-536-066.42 - Sewei Utilities Automotive ESTIMATED BUDGET RECOMMENDATION $83,000.00 Staff recommends that the bid be awarded to the two (2) low bidders, GMC General Truck and Don Reid Ford as the most responsive and responsible bidders meeting specifications as set forth in the Invitation to Bid. 5 BOOK 91 `'AGF •�� J A N 1994 . JAN 4 1994 BOOK ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by Commissioner Adams, the Board unanimously awarded Bid #4033 in the total amount of $70,533.00 to General GMC Truck and Don Reid Ford, as set forth in staff's memorandum. 91 P4E.368 F Award Bid #4031 - Dump Truck - Sandridge Golf Course The Board reviewed the following memo dated December 28, 1993: DATE: December 28, 1993 TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS THRU: James E. Chandler, County Admi strator H.T. "Sonny" Dean, Director General Services FROM: Fran Boynton Powell, Purchasing Managerli SUBJ: Award Bid #4031/Dump Truck Sandridge Golf Course BACKGROUND F . Bid Opening Date: November 17, 1993 Advertising Dates: Oct 27, Nov 10, 1993 Specifications Mailed to: Twenty Two (22) Vendors Replies: Six (6) Vendors VENDOR BID TOTAL General GMC Truck $15,788.50 West Palm Beach, FL Velde Ford $16,442.50 Vero Beach, FL Don Reid Ford $16,715.00 Maitland, FL Gator Ford $16,739.00 Tampa, FL Jim Rathman Chevrolet $18,994.90 Melbourne, FL Janie Dean Chevrolet .$19,225.00 Vero Beach, FL ;,TOTAL AMOUNT OF BID $15,788.50 BUDGETED AMOUNT:_ $24,000.00 SOURCE OF'FUNDS Golf Course Operations Heavy Equipment Wheel -Track Account Staff• recommends that -the bid 'be awarded -to General GMC Truck. Inc. as the lowest, most responsive and responsible bidder meeting specifications as set forth in the Invitation to Bid. 6 ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by Commissioner Adams, the Board unanimously awarded Bid #4031 to General GMC Truck in the amount of $15,788.50, as recommended by staff. Award Bid 44047 - Informational Directory - Indian River County Main Library The Board reviewed the following memo dated December 28, 1993: DATE: December 28, 1993 TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS THRU: James E. Chandler, County Administrator H.T. "Sonny" Dean, Director General Services FROM: Fran Boynton Powell, Purchasing Managerl/011i SUBJ: Award Bid 14047/Informational Directory Indian River County Main Library BACKGROUND INFORMATION: Bid Opening Date: Advertising Dates: Specifications Mailed to: Replies: December 3, 1993 November 19, 26, 1993 Twenty Five (25) Vendors Seven (7) Vendors VENDOR BID TOTAL Stevens Printing $ 4,800.00 Vero Beach, Fl All Service Graphics $ 5,985.00 Melbourne, FL Riverview Printing $ 6,285.00 Riverview, FL Coastal Graphics $ 6,650.00 Vero Beach, FL Bay Center $ 7,051.00 Tampa, FL Ironside Press $ 7,800.00 Vero Beach, FL Action Printers $ 8,284.60 Vero Beach, FL TOTAL AMOUNT OF BID $ 4,800.00 SOURCE OF FUNDS Main Library Miscellaneous Account $3,000.00 Donation from Council on Community Services 1,600.00 Donation from Indian River Memorial Hospital 200.00 Total, Funds Available $4,800.00 RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the bid be awarded to Stevens Printing as the lowest, most responsive and responsible bidder meeting specifications as set forth in the Invitation to Bid. 7 Boos J A N 4 1994 r JAN 41994 Boox1 91 P',^ �7 hf, �� ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by Commissioner Adams, the Board unanimously awarded Bid #4047 in the amount of $4,800 to Stevens Printing, as recommended by staff. PUBLIC HEARING - PROPOSED CHANGE (MINOR AMENDMENT) TO THE HARBOR TOWN CENTER (MALL) DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT DEVELOPMENT ORDER The hour of 9:05 a.m. having passed, the County Attorney announced that this public hearing has been properly advertised as follows: VERO BEACH PRESS -JOURNAL Published Daily Vero Beach, Indian River County, Florida COUNTY OF INDIAN RIVER: STATE OF FLORIDA Before the undersigned authority personally appeared J. J. Schumann, Jr. who on oath says that he Is Business Manager of the Vero Beach Press -Journal, a daily newspaper published at Vero Beach in Indian River County, Florida; that the attached copy of advertisement, being --0 vii f^� �na-a • o,: � v 1 ra�-i• IL N' N 53rd STI p -SUBJECT SITE . �% MXGT.� ` TICEMDIANO RIVER IC HEART In the matter of -� �.� OF RIVER C �M Ths Board of Canty Camnissloners old in the Court, was pub- lished in said newspaper in.the issues ofj%/hg �V IAffiant further says that the said Vero Beach Press-Joumai Is a newspaper published at Vero Beach, in said Indian River County, Florida, and that the said newspaper has heretofore been continuously published in said Indian River County, Florida, each daily and has been entered as second class mail matter at the post office in Vero Beach, in said Indian River Coun- ty, Florida, for a period of one year next preceding the first publication of the attached copy of advertisement; and affiant further says that he has neither paid nor promised any person, firm or corporation any discount, rebate, commission or refund for the purpose of securing this advertisement for publication in the said newspaper. „parry �,..•",Xwer,nalYerd subscribedlore a this day of D. 19 _ *'OTA '� $44� �c Tv - 4 A, a r -V Qj� ~ BARBARA .SPRAGUE. NOTARY PUBLIC. �us ass Manager) • JuneComm Was : c Stale at Florida. My Commission Exp, June 29. 1007 29 t �►� %`� •..... •ozo. ' S�rm�" No BARBARA Q SPRAGUE OF mul: fart': River County hsreDy ghro notce of a HEARING tp be hid at 9:05 am an Tuesday. Januarmm January 4, 1994, In the County Coission Cllarn- bars of the Camrth+ Admt�tratbn �dtq located,I i at 1840 25th Sweet Vero Beach, Florida. The eta Ject of the hearing Is to coreider adoption of nutrwr demoPC,VdpoW changes*1 to the m d order 0.) for the pro)ect m "be known as Harbor PICenter 0mill). The pro- posed amendments relate to Increasing tie maxi- mum commercial building area from 747 000 sWm feet to 798,900 square fest of gma��t_- able area, and exterdn! .3'S yens various pr act omvne cement and �� deadlines. The Harbor Tam Center pralect site Is generaty bcated as follows: gourd on the south by 53rd Street by the 4 brand Harbor RNar Club project on the east, by the North Relief Carrs on the north, and by U.S. Highway #1 on the wesL m Pe see the alwve beatbn map. a members of the W* are iwfted to Strand and participle at ire pAft hearing. Anyone who may wish tD appeal any decision which ,may be i made at tr "we vr8 need to so" that a ver- batim record of the ROM&O Is made, which ef- dudes test mill and evidence upon, which its ap- peal is based. ANYONE WHO NEEDS A SPECIAL ACCOMMODA- •• TION FOR THIS MEETING MIST CONTACT THE .1 COUNTY1 AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT I ADA) COORDINATOR AT 587.8000 X408 AT . ` T 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE OF THE MEET - 6 BBoard County� " • '`,� it a j y By._q-RIchsrd N. Rd, p alrm . 4j" i Dec. J�7 Planning Director Stan Boling commented from the following memo dated December 21, 1993: 8 TO: James Chandler County Administrator =obt HEAD CONCURRENCE: Keating,ICP Community Deevvejlopmtnt DVCector FROM: Stan Boling; AICP Planning Director DATE: December 21, 1993 SUBJECT: Proposed Change (Minor Amendment) to the Harbor Town Center (Mall) DRI Development Order It is requested that the data herein presented be given formal consideration by the Board of County Commissioners at its regular meeting of January 4, 1994. BACKGROUND: On March 28, 1989, the Board of County Commissioners adopted a development order (D.O.) approving the development of regional impact (DRI) known as Harbor Town Center for a regional mall, commercial out -parcel development, and 64 residential units. Subsequently, a few amendments were approved that modified the original D.O. The amended D.O. remains in effect and governs the general development of the entire project via specific development conditions and approved application materials. The project site contains 92.5 acres of land and is located at the northeast corner of US #1 and 53rd Street (see attachment #1). The site is currently used as a golf course and driving range (Whispering Lakes). and a citrus grove. No -site plan for DRI commercial development has been submitted by the developer and no DRI commercial development has occurred on.site. REQUESTED AMENDMENT Attorney Steve Henderson, on behalf of the project developer Petrie-Dierman-Kuhn, Inc., has filed a Notice of Proposed Change (NOPC)- and is now requesting an amendment to. the D.O. -to effect the following modifications: 1. Extend project commencement and completion deadlines as follows: A. Submittal of a mall site plan application FROM 6/30/93 TO 6/30/96 B. Commencement of mall construction FROM 12/31/93 TO 12/31/96 C. Completion of project construction FROM 12/31/96 TO 12/31/99 D. Traffic analysis update/building permit requirement FROM 12/31/93 TO 12/31/98 E. Development order termination date FROM 3/28/2009 TO 3/28/2013 9 JAN ,�9� BOOK 91 F,Gu371 rJAN 4 19- 2. Increase the maximum allowable amount of development by 49,900 square feet gross leasable follows: BOOK 91 F-mJr,.3 ! 2 commercial area ( GLA). as FROM 747,000 sq. ft. GLA (approximately 809,000 sq. ft. gross building area) TO 796,900 sq. ft. GLA (approximately 863,000 sq. ft. gross building area) 3. Update certain project perimeter buffer and project landscape requirements now contained in the D.O. to reflect current county buffer terminology and landscape standards. These requested changes are necessary to keep the project DRI approval valid and to establish more viable commencement and ;completion timeframes for project development (see attachment #2). CONSIDERATION OF THE REQUEST Pursuant to FS 380.06 which governs DRIs, the county may determine that the request does not constitute a substantial deviation and may be treated as a proposed change or "minor amendment". As a minor amendment, a change in an approved D.O. can be made by the Board of County Commissioners without official approval of the Regional Planning Council. In accordance with LDR section 916.05(1), the Planning and Zoning Commission considered the request at its December 9, 1993 meeting. IThe Planning and Zoning Commission recommended 6-0 that the Board ;of County Commissioners make a finding that the NOPC request does Inot constitute a substantial deviation and that the Board approve the request by adopting a D.O. resolution approving the request (see attachment #3). The Board is now to consider the request, and make a finding as to whether or not the request constitutes a substantial deviation and approve, approve with conditions, or deny the NOPC request. !ANALYSIS: *Determination: Not a Substantial Deviation County,.Department of Community Affairs (DCA), and -Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council (TCRPC) staff haver reviewed the request pursuant to FS 380.06 and have indicated that the request does not !increase project impacts to a degree that requires substantial deviation review (see attachment #4 and #5). Therefore, in staff's opinion,_ the NOPC request ..does not constitute a substantial deviation and may be :treated as a minor amendment:" Thus, all staff analyses _indicate that the county should find that the request does not constitute a substantial deviation. *Effect of Request The requested 49,900 square foot increase in potential commercial development along with the requested extension of project development timeframes would primarily affect project traffic impacts. On behalf of the developer, Rimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. has updated the project's original traffic analysis to reflect project development and build -out through the end of 1998. The updated traffic analysis indicates that the requested changes would not adversely impact major roadways within the project's traffic study area. Furthermore, the analysis indicates that no additional D.O. traffic conditions are necessary to accommodate -the proposed 10 changes. Public Works staff have reviewed and accepted the traffic analysis. Therefore, in staff's opinion the traffic impacts resulting from requested changes are acceptable and no additional D.O. traffic conditions are necessary. It should be noted that the existing D.O. will continue to contain a traffic monitoring conditions, whereby no project building permits will be issued beyond the traffic analysis build -out date (1998) unless and until the project's traffic analysis is again updated. County staff have no objection to approval of the NOPC request. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners: 1. Determine that the request does not constitute a substantial deviation. - 2. Adopt the attached resolution amending the Harbor Town Center D.O. to allow the requested changes as described in the NOPC request and in this report. The Chairman opened the public hearing and asked if anyone wished to be heard in this matter. Steve Henderson, attorney for the developers, asked if the Board had any questions. Commissioner Eggert asked, and Attorney Henderson clarified that there have been no changes within the development firm with the exception of Mr. Kuhn becoming a partner about 2 years ago. It was determined that no one else wished to be heard and the Chairman closed the public hearing. ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED by Commissioner Eggert, the Board unanimously adopted Resolution 94-1, amending the development order (D.O.) approved by the Board of County Commissioners for the Harbor Town Center Mall Development of Regional Impact (D.R.I), as recommended by staff. 001 JAN 4 1994 BOOK 91 pnu 373 L r JAN 4 1994 RESOLUTION NO. 94-1 BOOK 91 F-A,'A7 -1 RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA AMENDING THE DEVELOPMENT ORDER (D.O.) APPROVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS FOR THE HARBOR TOWN CENTER MALL DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT (D.R.I.). WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 380 Florida Statutes, the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida has adopted Resolution No. 89-31A (adopted March 28, 1989) establishing the Development Order approving the Harbor Town Center Mall Development of Regional Impact, and has adopted Resolution No. 89-128 (adopted September 26, 1989) amending said Development Order, and has adopted Resolution No. 92-13 (adopted January 28, 1992) amending said Development Order, and WHEREAS, the developer Petrie -Di erman-Kuhn, Inc., has formally applied for and has agreed to certain language changes within the Development Order (D.O.) relating to the extension of certain construction commencement and completion deadlines, the extension of the site plan submittal deadline, the extension of the'D.O. termination date, the increase in maximum allowable commercial development by 49,900 square feet of gross leasable area, and the updating of perimeter buffer and project landscape requirements contained in the original D.O. resolution, NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida that: 1. The Board of County Commissioners finds that the requested and proposed changes to the Development Order do not constitute a substantial deviation, pursuant to Chapter 380 Florida Statutes. 2. The notification of proposed change application and materials submitted on behalf of the developer, along with subsequent and related staff and applicant correspondence are hereby incorporated by reference into the Application for Development Approval (ADA) for the project. 3. All conditions and restrictions specified in the project Development Order (Resolution No. 89-31A, and as amended by Resolution No. 89-128 and Resolution No. 92-13), shall remain in full force and effect. 4. The D.O. termination date shall be March 28, 2013. S. The maximum amount of commercial development within the project shall be increased from 747,000 square feet to 796;900 square feet gross leasable area. 6. The mall site plan application submittal deadline in D.O. section 2.a. (reference Resolution No. 92-13) is extended from June 30, 1993 to June 30, 1996. 7. The mall construction commencement deadline in D.O. section 2.c.1. (reference Resolution No. 89-31A) is extended from December 31, 1993 to December 31, 1996. 8. The mall construction completion deadline in D.O. section 3 (reference Resolution No. 89-31A) is extended from December 31, 1996 to December 31, 1999. 9. The traffic analysis update and building permit issuance deadlines referenced in three instances in D.O. section 35 (reference Resolution No. 89-31A) are extended from December 31, 1993 to December 31, 1998. 10. The aesthetics and landscaping D.O. section 6 (reference Resolution No. 89-31A) is hereby amended to read as follows: 12 RESOLUTION NO. 94- 1 116. The following requirements shall be incorporated into the site plans of Harbor Town Center and related outparcel and residential developments. a. Perimeter Landscape Buffers* The following buffers shall be established as follows: U.S. #1 Type "C" buffer 25 feet (minimum) with 3' opaque feature 53rd Street Type "C" buffer 25 feet (minimum) with 3' opaque feature North Relief Canal Type "D" buffer East Property Line Type "C" buffer 30 feet (minimum) with 6' opaque feature *buffers as defined in the county LDRs b. Parking Area Interior Landscaping At a minimum ten percent (10%) of the total paved ` parking and driveway area shall be designated and improved as interior parking landscaped area (as described in the County Landscape Ordinance). C. Plant Material Size at Time of Installation The project's total tree requirements shall meet or exceed the county landscaping regulations in effect at the time of site plan approval. d. All healthy hardwoods found within the buffer yards described in paragraph "a." above shall be preserved. The foregoing resolution was offered by Commissioner Adams and the motion was seconded by Commissioner Eggert , and, upon being put to a vote, the vote was as follows: Chairman John W. Tippin Vice Chairman Ken Macht Commissioner Fran B. Adams Commissioner Richard N. Bird Commissioner Carolyn K. Eggert This Chairman thereupon declared the resolution duly passed and adopted this 4 day of ,January , 1994. INDIAN RIVER COUNTY COMMISSIONERS INDIAN RIVER CO FLORIDA ��lH� N, John ppin ATTEST: Jeffrey K/� Barton, County Cl k APPROVED AS TO PLANNING MATTERS: • fes! Robert M. Keati , AICP 13 JAN 41994 BOOK 91 pAu. 375 94 BOOK 1 JAN 4 9 U 91 PnF `376 -1 PROPOSED CHANGE (MINOR AMENDMENT) TO THE COUNTRYSIDE (FORMERLY VILLAGE GREEN WEST & SOUTH) DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT DEVELOPMENT ORDER The hour of 9:05 a.m. having passed, the County Attorney announced that this public hearing has been properly advertised as follows: VERO BEACH PRESS -JOURNAL Published Daily Vero Beach, Indian River County, Florida COUNTY OF INDIAN RIVER: STATE OF FLORIDA Before the undersigned authority personally appeared J. J. Schumann, Jr. who on oath says that he is Business Manager of the Vero Beach Press -Journal, a daily newspaper published at Vero Beach In Indian River County, Florida; that the attached copy advertisement, f being r n ' in the matter of i In the Court, was pub - fished in said newspaper in the issues of Affiant further says that the said Vero Beach Press•Joumal is a newspaper published at Vero Beach, In said Indian River County, Florida, and that the said newspaper has heretofore been continuously published in said Indian River County, Florida, each daily and has been entered as second class mail matter at the post office In Vero Beach, in said Indian River Coun- ty, Florida, for a period of one year next preceding the first publication of the attached copy of advertisement; and affiant further says that he has neither paid nor promised any person, firm or corporation any discount, rebate, commission or refund for the purpose of securing this advertisement for publication in the said newspaper. ".u..r... XwerAlb apd subscribed fore a this day of D. 19 OTA'A'p� 9%' .G� •= 4dus ess Manager) G • BARBARA . SPRAGUE. NOTARY PUBLIC. 4y 'e►nrll. 6tpire8= State of Florida My Commissar Exp. AM29.1907 ��tAt-l72 • • • • • • A Notary: !)ARRAN C. SPRAGUE 14 MAN RIYER COUNTY NOTiCE OF PUBLIC REARM The Board of County Ownd•slo rens of Indian RMer County herZ to notice of a PUBLIC ,� 4 t 1 ��Co County Ca exon Ch— bera of t6 Cow m4datratlon Bgw�ftrr� located at 1840 26th Street, Vero Beach, Florida. -nm stir oct of the hearing Is to consider adoption of minor amerdme nts ("proposed d '1 to the devebprtsnt order (D.O.) for the prp�ect for known as Nage Green West 6 Saith' tnax known as • Countryside.' The proposed emend_ meets relate to plans to develop a cur" vitt 46.65 acre portion of the overall protect as a conventional sing�fam8ys�n rather dw as a coni iation of mobile tam development. The proposed subdivision�Is rd oasiat of a maxim of 120 units is to be known as "Sabal Trace.' The "Countryside" protect ane is generally _1b anted as 101was: Bound on tiro south by 12th street, by 82nd Avenue on the east, and lying south of S.R. 60. The "Sabal Tram"of ,•Countryside•• Is located krrn edia ey 41 Of park tI�LCauntryside South mobile hamPam see the above location map - AAI A=lof the pAAc are krvite 1 to attend and ( wish lO appeal adedionh w !n rbemade at the meeting w7 need to ensue that a verbatim record of the proceed6hgs is made, which trxludes testimony ami evidence upon which the appeal Is ANYONE WHO NEEDS A SPECIAL ACCOMMODA- TION FOR THIS Mi: ANG MUST CONTACT THE COUNirS AMERICANS WffH DISAB®JTIES ACT SADA) COORDINATOR AT 667-8000 X408 AT LEAST 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE OF•THE MEET- Board Conry Cammissiarars B"Rdwd PC Bird, Chairman Dec. 9. 1093 - • 1054869 a -a3i1aQ � ' r i ri • s •: MAN RIYER COUNTY NOTiCE OF PUBLIC REARM The Board of County Ownd•slo rens of Indian RMer County herZ to notice of a PUBLIC ,� 4 t 1 ��Co County Ca exon Ch— bera of t6 Cow m4datratlon Bgw�ftrr� located at 1840 26th Street, Vero Beach, Florida. -nm stir oct of the hearing Is to consider adoption of minor amerdme nts ("proposed d '1 to the devebprtsnt order (D.O.) for the prp�ect for known as Nage Green West 6 Saith' tnax known as • Countryside.' The proposed emend_ meets relate to plans to develop a cur" vitt 46.65 acre portion of the overall protect as a conventional sing�fam8ys�n rather dw as a coni iation of mobile tam development. The proposed subdivision�Is rd oasiat of a maxim of 120 units is to be known as "Sabal Trace.' The "Countryside" protect ane is generally _1b anted as 101was: Bound on tiro south by 12th street, by 82nd Avenue on the east, and lying south of S.R. 60. The "Sabal Tram"of ,•Countryside•• Is located krrn edia ey 41 Of park tI�LCauntryside South mobile hamPam see the above location map - AAI A=lof the pAAc are krvite 1 to attend and ( wish lO appeal adedionh w !n rbemade at the meeting w7 need to ensue that a verbatim record of the proceed6hgs is made, which trxludes testimony ami evidence upon which the appeal Is ANYONE WHO NEEDS A SPECIAL ACCOMMODA- TION FOR THIS Mi: ANG MUST CONTACT THE COUNirS AMERICANS WffH DISAB®JTIES ACT SADA) COORDINATOR AT 667-8000 X408 AT LEAST 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE OF•THE MEET- Board Conry Cammissiarars B"Rdwd PC Bird, Chairman Dec. 9. 1093 - • 1054869 a The Board reviewed the following memo dated December 21, 1993: TO: James Chandler County Administrator DIV7�,C� N HEAD CONCURRENCE: ^ - Robert M. Keatin , AIC Community Deopment irector 46 FROM: Stan Boling, AICP Planning Director DATE: December 21, 1993 SUBJECT: Proposed Change (Minor Amendment) to the Countryside (formerly Village Green West & South) DRI Development Order It is requested that the data herein presented be given formal consideration by the Board of County Commissioners at its regular meeting of January 41 1994. BACKGROUND: On August 19, 1981, the Board of County Commissioners adopted a development order (D.O.) approving the development of regional impact (DRI) for the Village Green West and Village Green South project. The D.O. granted approval for a 317.5 acre mobile home park project, as well as some commercial development along S.R. 60 on property currently zoned commercial. This project is now known as Countryside North and Countryside South (see attachment #1), and has been sold -off in portions to five separate entities: Ellenburg Capital Corp. (Countryside North mobile home park), Heagerty and Chastain (Countryside South mobile home park), South County Fire District (fire station site), Indian ..River Memorial Hospital (vacant parcel),. -and Sable Trace (vacant parcel). Although the total DRI project area has been sold -off into separate parcels, the D.O. for the overall -. project still controls...all portions of the project. Sable Trace of Vero Beach, L.P. owns a 46'.55. acre portion of the DRI project (see attachment #2), and is proposing to amend the D.O. to allow. development of a two phase, conventional single family ._subdivision lather- than mobile home. park development' -In the portion -of the project owned'by Sable Trace. To allow this change in development plans, Sable Trace has applied for a "Notice of Proposed Change" (NOPC) to amend the D.O. In conjunction with the NOPC request, Sable Trace has applied to rezone "phase 1" of its property from RMH-8 (Residential Mobile Home up to 8 units/acre) to RS -6 (Residential Single Family up to 6 units/acre). At its August 12, 1993 meeting, the Planning and Zoning Commission considered this rezoning request and recommended that the Board of County Commissioners approve the rezoning. The Board of County Commissioners is scheduled to consider the rezoning request at its January 11, 1994 meeting. 15 UOOK 91FA;r +�77 JAN 41994__ PROPOSED D.O. AMENDMENT: -7 BOOK 91 PvF,978 The NOPC request would amend the Village Green/Countryside D.O. to effect the following three modifications: 1. Allow development of up to 120 single family lots and dwelling units (rather than 300 mobile home units) within the portion of the overall project owned by Sable Trace. Although the project developer is Sable Trace, the subdivision project is to be known as "Sabal Trace". 2. Reduce the total number of residential units allowed within the overall project from 1,448 (mobile homes) to 1,283 (1,163 mobile homes plus 120 single family homes). 3. "Update" the estimated overall project build -out date from 1984 to 2005. Approval of the NOPC request is necessary to accommodate Sabal Trace's plans to develop a portion of the overall project as a two phase single family subdivision (see attachment #3). CONSIDERATION OF THE REQUEST: Pursuant to FS 380.06 which governs DRIB, the county may determine that the request does not constitute a substantial deviation and may be treated as a proposed change or "minor amendment". As a minor amendment, a change in an approved D.O. can be made by the Board of County Commissioners without official approval from the Regional Planning Council. �In accordance with LDR section 916.05(1), the Planning and Zoning Commission considered the request at its December 9, 1993 meeting. The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended 4-2 that the Board of County Commissioners make a finding that the NOPC request does not constitute a substantial deviation and that the Board approve the request by adopting a D.O. resolution that incorporates the ,D.O. conditions recommended by staff (see attachment #4). The Board is now to consider the request, and make a finding as to whether or not .the request constitutes a substantial deviation and approve, approve with conditions, or deny the request. ANALYSIS: *Determination: Not a Substantial Deviation F 0Dnnty,:. Department of .:,Community Affairs ajDCA!`'; and Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council (TCRPC) staff have reviewed the request pursuant to FS 380.06 and have indicated that the requ6st does not constitute a substantial deviation because the applicant has demonstrated that the project will have no unacceptable level of service impacts on area roadway links, that overall project density will be decreased and that project impacts will likely decrease, and that housing meeting building code standards will be developed In lieu of mobile home housing (see attachment #5). Therefore, staff concludes that the applicant has adequately rebutted any presumption that the request constitutes a substantial deviation and that the request may be treated as a minor amendment. Thus, all staff analyses indicate that the county should find that the request does not constitute a substantial deviation. 16 _ M *General Effect of the Request The request decreases the project's residential unit development potential and updates project completion dates. Also, the request modifies the overall project's "Master Development Plan" in that the Sabal Trace property will not be interconnected with either the existing Countryside South mobile home park development to the north or with the undeveloped, vacant portion of the overall project to the south and east. Thus, Sabal Trace will separate the existing overall project mobile home development from the vacant portions of the overall project (see attachment #6). *Zoning Requirements Currently the Sabal Trace site (phases 1 & 2) is zoned RMH-8. To accommodate the applicant's plans for single-family subdivision development, the property needs to be rezoned to RS -6. At this time, the applicant has applied only to rezone phase 1 of the project site. To ensure that each phase of the project is properly zoned prior to approval and development, the D.O. must include a condition requiring the rezoning of each project phase prior to subdivision preliminary plat approval for each phase. *Buffer Requirements As described in staff's report to the Planning and Zoning Commission on the Sable Trace rezoning request, a landscape buffer between mobile home development and lower density residential development is required by the county's LDRs (40' wide Type "B" buffer). In regards to the Sabal Trace project proposal, such a buffer must be provided by the applicant between the Sabal Trace development and the existing mobile home development immediately north and west of the Sabal Trace site. To ensure that the buffer will be provided by the applicant, the D.O. must include a condition requiring the buffer. *Traffic Impacts The request updates the estimated project build -out date from 1984 to 2005. In conjunction with the request to extend the project build -out date, a traffic analysis update was performed which demonstrates that the .major roadways 'impacted by the overall project, taking into account the applicant's requested changes, would operate.. at acceptable levels of service through the project's new build -out date of 2005. Staff of TCRPC; DCA, and the county have accepted this analysis. As with other DRI D.O.s, staff recommends that the Village Green/Countryside D.O. include a condition that no building permits will be issued for the project beyond the traffic.. analysis date .(2005) unless and until the traffic_analysis-Is-apdated. County staff have specifically required the applicant to address two "local" traffic issues which do not fall under the purview of DCA or TCRPC. These issues are: A. The need for a left turn lane and a right turn deceleration lane for the project's 82nd Avenue entrance. B. The need for a roadway connection to 12th Street (occurring in phase two of the Sabal Trace project). Based upon traffic analysis provided by the applicant and by applying LDR Chapter 952.12(10)(h) turn lane requirements, Public Works staff recommends that the D.O. include a condition requiring 17 BOOK JAN 4 1994. 800K 91 F�GE 3 0 turn lanes for the 82nd Avenue entrance when phase 2 of the Sabal Trace project is developed (see attachment #7). Furthermore, Public Works and Emergency Services staff recommend that phase 2 of the Sabal Trace project include a paved roadway connection to 12th Street rather than a dead end cul-de-sac (see attachment #7 & #8). Based upon LDR Chapter 913.07(4)(H)(1)b. & c., 913.09(3)(c)4. and 913.09(3)(D) which address secondary access, emergency access, and dead end cul-de-sac length issues, it is staff's opinion that a paved roadway connection from the project to 12th Street or to an adjacent project that directly connects to 12th Street should be required via a D.O. condition (see attachment #9). Such a condition would ensure adequate secondary and emergency access for the Sabal Trace subdivision and would eliminate development of a ±3,700' long dead end cul-de-sac roadway. Subject to the previously referenced zoning, buffer, and traffic conditions, staff has no objection to approval of the NOPC request. Staff's proposed D.O. resolution (see attachment #10) incorporates the following "conditions": A. That prior to subdivision preliminary plat approval of any project phase, the applicant shall apply for and obtain rezoning of the phase to an appropriate residential single family zoning district. B. That in conjunction with the development of the Sabal Trace subdivision project, the developer shall provide along the northern and western boundary of the project the buffer that is required by the LDRs to be provided between mobile home development and lower density residential development. C. That no building permit(s) shall be issued for the project beyond the traffic analysis date (2005) unless and until the traffic analysis is updated. D. That phase 2 of the Sabal Trace project shall be designed and constructed to provide a paved roadway connection to 12th Street or to an adjacent project that directly connects to 12th Street. E. That phase 2 of the Sabal Trace project shall be designed and constructed *to provide a left turn.. lane and a right turn deceleration lane at the project's 82nd Avenue entrance. Said turn lanes shall meet or exceed county standards. As an alternative to providing the turn lanes, the applicant may provide to the county at the time of phase 2 preliminary plat approval an updated traffic analysis that addresses the need lor the turn. lanes.._. If the- updated arialysis is acceptable to the county -traffic engineer, and if the analysis demonstrates that no turn lanes are needed under county traffic LDRs, then no turn lanes shall be required. Thus, in staff's opinion, the proposed resolution contains all of the appropriate D.O. conditions recommended by staff and the Planning and Zoning Commission. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners: 1. Determine that the NOPC request substantial deviation. 18 does not constitute a a II � � � �� %• �� • '� �, � I __ _ ---- 2. Adopt the attached resolution amending the Village Green/Countryside D.O. to allow the changes described in the NOPC request and this report, with conditions as described in this report. Planning Director Stan Boling directed the Boards attention to an overhead graphic of the subject area. He asked that the following letter be placed in the record: STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNIT 2740 CENTEItVIEW DRIVE • TALLA,HASSEE, FL LAWTON CHILES Governor December 27, 1993 Mr. Robert Keating Planning and Development Director Indian River County 1840 25th Street, Suite N-158 Vero Beach, Florida 32960 0 0 LINDA LOOMIS SHELLEY Secretary RE: ADA -1081-020; Village Green West and South DRI; Substantial Deviation Determination Dear Mr. Keating: Mr. James W. Young has filed revisions to the notification of proposed change (NOPC) with the Department requesting changes to the master development plan for Village Green West and South (a/k/a Countryside North and South, and Sabal Trace) development of regional impact (DRI). In a letter dated November 4, 1993, I advised you that the Department would be participating in the public hearing for the Village Green West and South DRI. In our continuing investigation, we have reviewed additional information and revisions to the NOPC to extend the buildout date for the entire DRI to December 31, 2005 submitted by the applicant. The revisions to the NOPC, the revised traffic analysis, and the revised proposed development order language adequately address all of the Department's concerns. ThereforQ, the Department has no further objections to the proposed changes to the Village Green West and South DRI NOPC and will not participate in the public hearing to discuss the proposed changes. If you have any questions or comments concerning this matter, please call Brenda Winningham or me at (904)488-4925. incerely, J Nomas Beck, Ch I Bur au of State P ann g 19 JAN 4 1994 BOOK F, JAN 4 1994 BOOK 71 Fps 3S The Chairman opened the public hearing and asked if anyone wished to be heard in this matter. There being none, he closed the public hearing. ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by Commissioner Bird, the Board unanimously adopted Resolution 94-2, amending the development order (D.O.) approved by the Board of County Commissioners for the Development of Regional Impact (D.R.I.) project formerly known as Village Green West and Village Green South, now known as Countryside North and Countryside South, as recommended by staff. RESOLUTION NO. 94- V51 RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY dbMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA AMENDING THE DEVELOPMENT ORDER (D.O.) APPROVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT (D.R.I.) PROJECT FORMERLY KNOWN AS VILLAGE GREEN WEST & VILLAGE GREEN SOUTH, NOW KNOWN AS COUNTRYSIDE NORTH & COUNTRYSIDE SOUTH WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 380 Florida statutes, the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida has adopted Resolution 81-59 (adopted August 19, 1981) establishing the Development Order (D.O.) and approving the Development of Regional Impact (DRI) for the project formerly known as Village Green West & Village Green South, now known as Countryside North and Countryside South; and WHEREAS, one of the project developers, Sable Trace of vero Beach, L.P., has formally applied for and has agreed to certain changes to the development approval relating to the Master Development Plan and establishing a new build -out date for the overall D.R.I. project; /and WHEREAS,the proposed changes will result in a decrease in residential units to be constructed within the overall D.R.I. project; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida that: 1. The Board of County Commissioners finds that the proposed changes to the DRI plan, the build -out date, and to the D.O. do not constitute a substantial deviation pursuant to Chapter 380 of the Florida Statutes. 2. The notification of proposed'thange application and materials submitted on behalf of the developer, along with subsequent and related staff and applicant correspondence are hereby incorporated by reference into the Application for Development Approval (ADA) for the project. 3. All conditions and restrictions specified in the project Development Order (Resolution 81-59), shall remain in full force and effect. 4. The Master Development Plan as shown in Exhibit 12-2 (Revision 1) attached, is hereby added to the project and approved for residential and commercial development, subject to paragraph 14 of this resolution. _. 5. The build -out date for the overall DRI project is hereby established as December 31, 2005. The termination date for the overall DRI project is hereby established as December 31, 2010. 20 RESOLUTION NO. 94-_2_ 6. The annual reporting date, which is the responsibility of all property owners within the DRI, is August 19th of each year. Contents of the report are to include those items required in Florida Administrative Code Rule 9J -2.025(7)(a -j). The annual report shall be submitted to: a. Florida Department of Community Affairs b.. Indian River County Board of County Commissioners C. Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council d. Florida Department of Environmental Protection e. St. Johns River Water Management District 7. The termination date is established as the date until which local government agrees that the approved DRI shall not be subject to down -zoning, unit density reduction, or intensity reduction, unless the local government can demonstrate that substantial changes in the conditions underlying the approval of the development order have occurred, or that the development order was based on substantially inaccurate information provided by the developer, or that the change is clearly established by local government to be essential to the public health, safety, or welfare. 8. The present owners of record of the land within the DRI consist of: Countryside North: Ellenburg Capital Corporation 5550 Southwest Macadam Ave., Suite 200 Portland, Oregon 97201 Countryside South: Mr. & Mrs. James J. & Margaret W. Haegerty and Mr. & Mrs. J. Harold & Barbara M. Chastain 41 Tidy Island Boulevard Bradenton, FL 34210 Sabal Trace: Sable Trace of Vero Beach, L.P. 4452 Powers Road Atlanta, GA 30327 Southeast Corner: South Indian River County Fire District Post Office Box 1028 Vero Beach, FL 32961-1028 Remainder of Southeast Corner: Indian River Memorial Hospital 1000 36th Street Vero Beach, FL 32960 9. There will be 1,163 mobile home units and 120 single family homes for a total of 1,283 residential units which is a reduction of 165 units from the original 1,448 units approved for the residential portion of the project. 10. The. water treatment area at the northwest corner of Village Green South (VGS), presently Countryside South (CS) was eliminated and two lots were added. Water for VGS (CS) is furnished by Indian River County Utilities Department. 11. The sewage treatment plant to be located at the southwest corner of VGS (CS) was eliminated and replaced with lots and a storage area. Sewage from VGN (CN) and VGS (CS) is pumped to the Indian River County Sewage Treatment Plant. 21 JAN 41994 BOOK 91 Fv.G F 383 JEAN 4 1994 BOOK 91 PAGE')84 RESOLUTION NO. 94- 2 12. No building permit shall be issued for development within the overall DRI project after December 31, 2005 unless a traffic study for the project is conducted by the developer and is approved by Indian River County, the Florida Department of Transportation, and the Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council. The study shall identify the improvements and timing of those improvements necessary to maintain adopted levels of service on the impacted transportation network, and shall propose an improvements program that is acceptable to Indian River County, Florida Department of Transportation, and the Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council. 13. The legal description of the overall DRI project is contained in Exhibit "A", attached. The legal description of the Sabal Trace project portion of the overall DRI project is contained in Exhibit "B", attached. 14. Local government conditions related to the Sabal Trace portion of the.overall DRI project are as follows: A. Prior to subdivision preliminary plat approval of any Sabal Trace project phase, the applicant shall apply for and obtain rezoning of the phase to an appropriate' residential zoning district. B. In conjunction with the development of the Sabal Trace subdivision project, the developer shall provide along the northern and western boundary of the Sabal Trace project the buffer that is required by the county land development regulations (LDRs) to be provided between mobile home development and lower density residential development. C. Phase 2 of the Sabal Trace project shall be designed and constructed to provide a paved roadway connection to 12th Street or to adjacent property that is directly connected to 12th Street via a paved roadway. D. Phase 2 of the Sabal Trace project shall include the design and construction of a left turn lane and a right turn deceleration lane at the project's 82nd Avenue entrance. Said turn lanes shall meet or exceed county standards. As an alternative to providing the turn lanes, the applicant may provide to the county at the time of Sabal Trace phase 2 preliminary plat review an updated traffic analysis that addresses the need for the turn lanes. If the updated analysis is acceptable to the county traffic engineer, and if the analysis demonstrates that no turn lanes are needed under county traffic LDRs, then no turn lanes shall be required. The foregoing resolution was offered by Commissioner Fquprt and the motion was seconded by Commissioner Rini , and, upon being put to a vote, the vote was as follows: Chairman John W. Tippin Aye Vice Chairman Ken Macht Commissioner Fran B. Adams Commissioner Richard N. Bird Commissioner Carolyn K. Eggert 22 Aye Aye Aye Aye M RESOLUTION NO. 94-.9_ This Chairman thereupon declared the resolution duly passed and adopted this 4 day of January , 1994. INDIAN RIVER COUNTY COMMISSIONERS INDIAN -RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA CHA John W..Ti n .__, ATTEST: Jeffrey, Barton, County erk ,may. , i�Gf�' G��r`-/ el. APPROVED AS TO PLANNING MATTERS: mow, 444�5 PAt Robert M. Kea ng, AICP APPROVED AS TO FOktM AND LEGAL SUFFICIENCY: William G. Collins Deputy County Attorney SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL DISTRICT - FRANCHISE AND RECYCLING CONTRACT CHANGES Chairman Tippin announced that this agenda item is a Solid Waste Disposal District Public Hearing and that the Board would now temporarily adjourn to sit as the Board of Commissioners of the Solid Waste Disposal District. Those Minutes are being prepared separately. Upon motion duly made, seconded and carried, the meeting was temporarily adjourned at 9:25 a.m. The Board reconvened at 9:50 a.m. 23 BOOK JAN 4 1994 9� F�;.. 3 JAN 4 1994 BOOK APPROVAL OF ADDITIONAL TELEPHONE DEVICE FOR THE DEAF (TDD) ASSOCIATED EQUIPMENT FOR B911 PUBLIC SAFETY ANSWERING POINTS AND THE COUNTY EMERGENCY OPERATIONS CENTER The Board reviewed the following memo dated December 17, 1993: TO: Board of County Commissioners THROUGH: Jim Chandler, unty Administrator FROM: Doug Wright l hector Department of Emergency Services DATE: December 17, 1993 SUBJECT: Approval of Additional Telephone Device for the Deaf (TDD) - Associated Equipment for E911 Public Safety Answering Points and the County . Emergency Operations Center It is respectfully requested that the information contained herein be given formal consideration by the Board of County Commissioners at the next regular scheduled meeting. DESCRIPTION.AND_CONDITIONS: The Sheriff's Department has formally requested that an additional Telephone Device for the Deaf (TDD) be purchased for use in the E911 Communications Center. The Communications Center currently has one TDD which was purchased approximately two (2) years ago. Due to the increase in use and the large number of "silent" calls received at the Center, the additional TDD would assist in handling the call flow and act as a back-up if a TDD failed to function. It would also assure compliance with the ADA legislation relating to the hearing impaired public. The Communications Center staff has also requested that a TDD Detector be purchased and installed. This would assist the Center operators in identifying TDD calls faster and with greater accuracy. As the Board is aware, legislation requires that emergency calls be answered within ten (10) seconds and TDD calls must be answered within twenty (20) seconds by the Communications Center. The Public Service Commission is now randomly testing for compliance with the law and fines have been levied for violations. The TDD Ultratec Superprint ES TDD, FCC Registration Number D8R7IB- 15278-OT-R, is priced at $448.00 and is available through Florida State Contract #730-300-93-1 with Harris Communications of Eden Prairie, Minnesota. The TDD Detector is not on state contract and not available from Harris Communications. The detector can be purchased through Ultratec at a price of 399.00 plus $10.00 shipping. A total of three (3) TDD Detectors is needed in order to provide one for each of the two 911 PSAP's and one for the County Emergency Operations Center. ALTERNATIVES AND ANALYSIS: The Americans with Disabilities Act, Chapter 427 and Chapter 165, Florida Statutes, as well as the Florida State Communications Plan requires that persons with hearing or speech impairments have access to telecommunications systems and services the same as other individuals. 24 The additional equipment will assist in precluding a call for emergency assistance from a hearing impaired person being delayed or not answered. The current policy is that all "silent line" calls are assumed to be a TDD call and they are handled accordingly.. However, during extremely busy times, it is possible for a silent line call from a hearing impaired person not be recognized immediately. The TDD Detectors will provide a signal to the 911 Call Takers that a TDD call is incoming and it can be timely handled and the appropriate emergency assistance dispatched quickly. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Board authorize the purchase of one TDD and three (3) TDD Detectors from the appropriate vendors noted above for use in the 911 PSAP's and the County Emergency Operations Center for a total expenditure of $1,675. Funds for the purchase of this equipment is available in the Communications Center budget in account No. 133. Staff also recommends that the Board authorize the necessary budget amendment for funds to be expended for the equipment. ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED by Commissioner Macht, the Board unanimously authorized the purchase of Telephone Devices for the Deaf (TDD) at a total cost of $1,675, as set forth in the staff's recommendation. INDOOR AIR QUALITY - COUNTY ADMINISTRATION BUILDING General Services Director Sonny Dean commented from the following memo dated December 27, 1993: DATE: DECEMBER 27, 1993 TO: HONORABLE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS THRU: JAMES E. CHANDLER COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR FROM: H.T. "SONNY" DEAN, DIRECTOR `G�% DEPARTMENT OF GENERAL SERVICES SUBJECT: INDOOR AIR QUALITY - COUNTY ADMINISTRATION BUILDING BACKGROUND: At a regular meeting on November 2, 1993, the Board authorized staff to negotiate an amendment to the present contract with Gee and Jenson for Indoor Air Quality (IAQ) consulting services. The additional services was to investigate and report on the HVAC systems of the County Administration Building as per a scope of work prepared by staff. A copy of that scope is attached for perusal. The contract is divided into four (4) phases: 25 j6, JAN 41994 BOOK 91 F9Gc.317 SAN 4 1994 BOOK 91 PAGE -398 Phase I - Study and report on the existing physical conditions of the existing air handling units and an analysis of the ability of these.systems to maintain suitable conditions in the building. Provide information as to maximum capability of units vs.recommended guidelines and protocol of recognized standards. Phase II - Recommendations and schematics to provide design and cost estimates to perform renovations to the existing air handling systems. Phase III - Provide plans, details, and specifications to allow the County to bid the remedial work. Phase IV - Construction Administration to review shop drawings and observe construction progress and completion. The specifications call for Phases I and II to be completed and authorization.be provided -for prior to proceedinq:on with Phases III and.IV. Staff has negotiated a contract with -Gee and Jenson to complete the first two phases based on their actual expenses, employee time and ,material at a _ fixed. sate. ; They provided. a. not to exceed price of RECOMMENDATIONS• It is recommended that the Board approve an amendment to Gee and Jenson's contract at a cost not to exceed $10,750.00 and authorize their chairman to execute the applicable documents. Commissioner Adams agreed building's entire air handling that we should include the system in the study. She asked whether we have any idea how much Phases 3 and 4 will cost. Director Dean explained that we cannot make that determination until the consultants complete their study. MOTION WAS MADE by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED by Commissioner Bird, to approve an amendment to the County's contract with Gee and Jensen to provide consultant services at a cost not to exceed $10,750, as set forth in staff's memorandum. Under discussion, Commissioner Eggert commented that a charge of $55 per hour for typing services seems excessive. Commissioner Macht pointed out that the company included overhead and administrative expenses in that figure. Commissioner Adams asked whether the ductwork in the Utilities Department and the conference room is leaking, because a number of ceiling tiles in the Utilities Department and the conference room were replaced about a month ago, and the new ones are discolored already. Director Dean explained that staff is recommending that we delay making any additional repairs until the consultant's study is completed. 26 Commissioner Adams felt that staff should continue to replace ceiling tiles and repair existing leaks, especially in those areas. William Koolage, 11 Vista Gardens Trail, stated that he spent a couple of days at the office of the Supervisor of Elections and nearly froze, and he felt that it frequently is too cool in Chambers. He stressed that it would save the County money on air conditioning costs if the temperature in the building was kept a little higher. Commissioner Eggert commented that it seems to be difficult to keep the temperature adjusted, because sometimes it is too warm and other times it is too cold. She pointed out that we must be careful not to let temperatures get too warm because it could cause problems with the computers. THE CHAIRMAN CALLED FOR THE QUESTION. It was voted on and carried unanimously. AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO CONSULTANT AGREEMENT IS ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD EMPLOYEE HEALTH CARE PLAN CONSULTANT The Board reviewed the following memo dated December 28, 1993: TO: James Chandler, County Administrator FROM: Jack Price, Personnel Director DATE: 28 December 1993 SUBJECT: Employee Health Care Plan Consultant In 1990 the Board of County Commissioners authorized a complete review and revision, if necessary, of the employee health care plan. The purposes were to continue to provide competitive coverage for employees and to do so in the most cost effective manner. The plan redesign which was effective in October, 1991, focused'the employee treatment patterns on Preferred Provider Organizations who discounted their fees in exchange for an anticipated greater volume of business. This approach has been helpful in the accomplishment of the health care objectives. With your approval, 1994 was set as the period during which another comprehensive review of the plan would be conducted with the same dual objectives: competitive coverage and effective cost controls. An RFP for consultants drew proposals from Siver Insurance Management Consultants of St. Petersburg, Stanford & Co. of Safety Harbor, Waters Risk Management of Seminole, Towers Perrin of Tampa, and Coopers & Lybrand of Tampa. The proposals were reviewed by the health care committee, comprised of Ann Rankin, Personnel; Beth Jorma, Risk Management; Joe Baird,. County Budget Officer; and me. 27 IAN 4 1994 BOOK 91 �acF 9 r�99� JAN 4 MR. 91 39® The committee ranked the firms in the following order. 1. Siver Insurance Management Consultants 2 Stanford & Co. 3. Towers Perrin The committee recommends that Siver Insurance Management Consultants be approved for this task. The bid cost is $16400. The amount budgeted for this purpose is $20,000. Thanks for your assistance. Approved By J7'" Chandler, Co my Administrator Meeting Date: January 4, 1994 ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED by Commissioner Bird, the Board unanimously approved the selection of Siver Insurance Management Consultants to perform a comprehensive review of the employee health care plan at a total cost of $16,400, as recommended by staff. CONTRACT IS ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS - MURPHY DEED RESERVATIONS ALONG COUNTY ROADS The Board reviewed the following memo dated December 17, 1993: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: REF. MEMO: DATE: James E. Chandler, County Administrator James W. Davis, P.E., C)Sl- Public Works Director RFP - Murphy Deed Reservations along County Roads T.P. O'Brien to James Davis dated Dec. 10, 1993 December 17, 1993 FILE: RMAM DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS During the 1993/94 Budget hearings, the Board approved funding in the amount of $20,000 to research Murphy Deed Reservations along County Roads which were previously on the State Road System. The attached RFP has been prepared to request proposals from title companies to perform the title search work. RECOMMENDATIONS AND FUNDING Staff recommends that staff be authorized to advertise the attached RFP. Funding to be from the Transportation Fund - Engineering Division Account 111-244-541-033.19. 28 J ON MOTION by Commissioner Macht, SECONDED by Commissioner Eggert, the Board unanimously authorized staff to advertise a request for proposals (RFP) to provide a sketch and other documentation showing right-of-way that results from deed reservations in Murphy Act lands in Indian River County, as recommended by staff. VERO LAKE ESTATES - REQUEST FOR GRADING 106TH AND 105TH AVENUES The Board reviewed the following memo dated December 17, 1993® TO: James E. Chandler, County Administrator FROM: James W. Davis, P.E., Public Works Director SUBJECT: Request for Grading 106th Avenue and 105th Avenue in Vero Lake Estates REF. LETTERS: 1) Danny Collins, Kathleen Russell dated Nov. 19, 1993 2) Mr. & Mrs. Hunter dated Oct. 12, 1993 DATE: December 17, 1993 FILE: 1056106.AGN DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS During the regular May 15, 1991 meeting of the Board of County Commissioners, staff recommended that the County assume grading of approximately 13 miles of additional unpaved roads in the Vero Lake Estates Subdivision. Various roads have been added since that time with the approval of the Board. At this time, various property.owners along 106th Avenue between 81st Street and 83rd Street and 105th Avenue between 88th Street and 89th Street have requested that the County grade 106th Avenue and 105th Avenue in Vero Lake Estates Subdivision. ALTERNATIVES AND ANALYSIS Staff has reviewed these requests and performed the standard numerical evaluation of criteria for acceptance of grading unimproved roads. Staff usually recommends that a minimum of 75 points be assigned to justify grading. In this case, a minimum of 75,.points was assigned. RECOMMENDATIONS AND FUNDING Since the minimum of 75 points was met, staff recommends the addition of 106th Avenue between 81st Street and 83rd Street and 105th Avenue between 88th Street and 89th Street be added to the grading route in Vero Lake Estates. ON MOTION by Commissioner Macht, SECONDED by Commissioner Adams, the Board unanimously added 106th Avenue between 81st and 83rd Streets and 105th Avenue between 88th and 89th Streets to the grading route in Vero Lake Estates, as recommended by staff. Fes] JAN 41994 Boos I F, JA.N 41.994 BOOK 91 PAUrE -392 FINAL PAYMENT - VERO LAKE ESTATES DRAINAGE STUDY The Board reviewed the following memo dated December 27, 1993: TO: James E. Chandler, County Administrator FROM: James W. Davis, P.E. Public Works Director SUBJECT: FINAL PAYMENT - VERO LAKE ESTATES DRAINAGE STUDY DATE: December 27, 1993 FILE: vr,E WAL.aax DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS In • 1987, Beindorf • Associates,• a division • of Kimley-Horn • & Associates, was retained by the Board of County Commissioners to perform a Master Drainage Plan for the Vero Lake Estates Subdivision for the total authorized fee of $76,625. In September 1990, the Board approved the prelimary drainage study and the county authorized.the consultant to begin the Final Design. The. Master Drainage Plan was received from Kimley-Horn in November of 1992. The project is 100% complete as of November 30, 1993 and Kimley-Horn is now requesting the retainage fee of $7,663.12 RECOMMENDATIONS AND FUNDING Staff recommends payment of the retainage fee in the amount of $7,663.12 from Vero Lake Estates MSTU fund. ON MOTION by Commissioner Macht, SECONDED by Commissioner Adams, the Board unanimously authorized release of retainage in the amount of $7,663.12 to Kimley-Horn & Associates, as recommended by staff. PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING SERVICES AGREEMENT - 4TH STREET WIDENING PROJECT FROM WEST OF US -1 TO 500 FEET WEST OF OLD DIXIE HIGHWAY The Board reviewed the following memo dated December 27, 1993: TO: James Chandler County Administrator THROUGH: James W. Davis, P.E. Public Works Director SUBJECT: Professional Engineering Services Agreement 4th Street Widening Project from West of US 1 to 500' West of Old Dixie Highway DATE: December 27, 1993 fin48'P.agn DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS The Public Works Department has negotiated a contract with the selected firm, Keith and Schnars, for the Professional Engineering Services for the widening of 4th Street as outlined in memorandum dated July 30, 1993 and approved by the County Commission on August 10; 1993. The proposed agreement includes the project scope of work. This project will -compliment the Florida Department of Transportation's project to add westbound left turn lanes at Indian River Boulevard and U.S. 1. 30 F-7 total fees negotiated for the 4th Street widening is $51,914.00. The break -down is as follows PROJECT Estimated- Design Design Right -of -Way and Fee Fee Construction Cost Percentage th Street Widening $1,200,000.00 $51,914.00 4.3% LTERNATIVES AND ANALYSIS lternatives are as follows: Alternative No. 1 Approve the requested $51,914.00 design fee for Keith & Schnars Assoc Alternative No. 2. Re -negotiate the contract. AND FUNDING recommends approval of Alternative No. 1. Funding will be from ict 6 Traffic Impact Fee Fund and Secondary Road Trust Fund. Commissioner Macht questioned paragraph 14.B. of the agreement here it states that the engineer will charge an additional fee to attend up to 3 conferences with the County. He felt that those meetings should be included in the basic contract. Director Davis explained that meetings with staff and County review meetings are included in the basic contract. Paragraph 4.B. refers to any extra meetings that might be held between the engineer and the Board. Commissioner Adams asked whether Keith & Schnars has an office in Vero Beach, and Director Davis confirmed that they have a satellite office in Vero Beach with full-time employees that will remain in operation during this project. Discussion ensued regarding travel reimbursement. Commissioner Macht felt that travel reimbursement should not be paid to an out-of-town company when there are companies in this area capable of performing the same work. ON MOTION by Commissioner Bird, SECONDED by Commissioner Adams, the Board unanimously approved an agreement with Keith & Schnars Associates in the amount of $51,941, as recommended by staff. AGREEMENT IS ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD 31 JAN 1994 BOO fr1uC tJ� r JAN 4 1994 BOOK 91 FIRE HYDRANT RELOCATION - CR -512 - WORK AUTHORIZATION NO. 17, DRIVEWAYS. INC. The Board reviewed the following memo dated December 20, 1993: DATE: DECEMBER 20, 1993 TO: f JAMES E. CHANDLER COUNTY ADMINISTRATO FROM: TERRANCE G. PINT DIRECTOR OF UTI T S ICES PREPARED ROBERT O. WISEMEN, P.E V SAND STAFFED ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEER BY: DEPARTMENT OF UTILITY SERVICES 1SUBJECT: FIRE HYDRANT RELOCATION - C.R. 512 i WORK AUTHORIZATION NO. 17 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY BID NO. 4007 On September 21, 1993, the Board of County Commissioners approved the award of the labor contract bid to Driveways, Inc., Bid No. 4007 (see attached minutes). The Department of Utility Services proposes to use this labor contract to relocate three fire hydrants to the northern portion of C.R. 512. ANALYSIS The project consists of relocating three fire hydrants. It involves the extension of approximately 120 linear feet each of 6 -inch ductile iron pipe water main, valves, fittings, etc. The fire hydrants are to be relocated to the northern portion of C.R. 512 to avoid conflict with the Department of Public Works twin pair. The cost of the labor to construct the water main under the labor contract is $3,330.68 (see attached Work Authorization No. 17 with Driveways, Inc.). The pipe and fittings will be supplied by the County at a cost of $5,111.32. Funding for this project will be from the fire hydrant maintenance fund. RECOMMENDATION The staff of -the Department of Utility Services recommends that the Board of. County: Commissioners execute- the attached agreement, which approves Work Authorization No. 17 to construct the subject project with Driveways, Inc., for the amount of $3,330.68, to extend an estimated 360 linear feet of water main, and to authorize expenditure of $5,111.32.for materials. MOTION WAS MADE by Commissioner Eggert, seconded by Commissioner Adams, to approve Work Authorization No. 17 with Driveways, Inc., in the amount of $3,330.68, to extend an estimated 360 linear feet of water main, and authorized the expenditure of ,t $5,111.32 for materials, as recommended by staff. ti 32 Under discussion, Utility Services Director Terry Pinto dvised that the placement of the water lines was based on reformation that was available at that time. He explained that tility lines sometimes must be relocated because of road widening rojects that occur after the lines are in place. Commissioner Bird noted that the narrow right-of-way and the rainage ditch on the north side of CR -512 made it necessary for he lines to be placed between the asphalt and the bottom of the rainage ditch. He commented that the lines will be underneath the avement after the road is widened, but it was his understanding hat this will not be a problem. Director Pinto stated that he prefers for utility lines to be nderneath the street. He explained that even though the road arf ace must be repaired whenever work is done on the lines, he ould rather do that than disturb people's landscaping. Commissioner Adams asked whether we could charge the cost of alocating these lines to the road widening project, and Director into explained that when permission is granted to install utility ines, there is always a provision in the agreement for the cost of ay relocation to be paid with utilities rfunds. THE CHAIRMAN CALLED FOR THE QUESTION. It was voted on and carried unanimously. WORK AUTHORIZATION IS ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD The Board reviewed the following memo dated December 16, 1993: 33 j6JAN 1994 BOOK 91 F'nE 30 JAN 4 1994 BOOK 9 F'r1GE� DATE: DECEMBER 16, 1993 TO: JAMES E. CHANDLER COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR FROM: TERRANCE G. PINT DIRECTOR OF UTI ITY VICES PREPARED TERRY H. DRUM 1 AND STAFFED ENVIRONMENTAL SPECIALI BY: DEPARTMENT OF UTILITY SERVICES SUBJECT: REMOVAL OF '200, 000 -GALLON GROUND ..STORAGE TAMC AT"VERG- _ BEACH HIGHLANDS BACKGROUND On September 7, 1993, the Board of County Commissioners approved the purchase of the Vero Shores/Vero Beach Highlands Water and Sewer System from General Development Utilities, Inc. (see attached minutes). One of the items obtained in the purchase was a 200,000 -gallon unused water storage tank. The utility has no need/use for the tank, and removal of this tank would please the surrounding residents and increase the value of the property. ANALYSIS Upon approval by the Board of County Commissioners, the Department of Utility Services will contact several contractors to obtain bids for } the sale and removal of the 200,000 -gallon ground storage tank located at the old General Development Utilities Water Treatment Plant in Vero Beach Highlands. As with past bids for these items, a low bidder turnout is expected. This is mainly due to the low price of scrap steel in today's market, along with the cost of dismantling and removal. We estimate the price for the storage tank at ± $2,000.00. RECOMMENDATION The staff of the Department of Utility Services recommends that the Board of County Commissioners approve the process of obtaining quotes for the sale and removal of the subject storage tank. Utility Services Director Terry Pinto stated for the record that it is a 250,000 -gallon rather than a 200,000 -gallon tank. ON MOTION by Commissioner Macht, SECONDED by Commissioner Adams, the Board unanimously approved the process of obtaining quotes for the sale and removal of the subject storage tank, as recommended by staff. 34 STRUCTURAL FAILURE - WEST REGIONAL WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT The Board reviewed the following memos dated December 30 and December 28, 1993: DATE: December 30, 1993 TO: JAMES E. CHANDLER COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR FROM: TERRANCE G. PINTO DIRECTOR OF UTIL SERVICES SUBJECT: STRUCTURAL FAILURE - WEST REGIONAL WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT ACKGROUND: On December 25, 1993, Christmas Day, there was a major structural failure of the clarifier walls at the West Regional Wastewater Treatment Plant. The staff, working Christmas day and night, was able to prevent the wall from totally collapsing by bracing it with timbers. ANALYSIS: The treatment plant is 8 years old, with an expected life of 30 years. The cause of the failure has not been determined. We have notified the design engineer, Carter Associates, Inc., Williams, Hatfield, and Stone, and the manufacturer of the treatment plant, Marolf Company. Our legal staff has been notified and the engineering firm of Camp, Dresser & McKee, Inc., with whom we have a continuing contract for engineering service, has been authorized to perform an independent evaluation. RECOMMENDATION: We request the Board of County Commissioners to authorize the staff to continue under emergency conditions to repair the structure and determine liability. At this time, no cost estimates are available. DATE: DECEMBER 28, 1993 TO: TERRY PINTO, UTILITIES DIRECTOR FROM: TERRY SOUTHARD, WASTEWATER SUPERINTBNDENTp SUBJECT: WEST REGIONAL CLARIFIER WALL PROBLEM Jim DeGraffenreid was notified by John Mittendorf that the clarifier guide bracket was broken on the Northeast side. Jim went and looked over the problem and found that the chain was off the sprocket, causing the flygt boards to hit the weir support bars. Jim notified me and after trying to put the chain back on I decided to pump the clarifier down. I called in our plant mechanic and the on-call liftstation mechanic, along with the operator from the Gifford and North County plants to help set up the equipment and repair the problem. 35 JAN 1994 BOOK 91 P}tiGF397 r JAN 4 1994 BOOK 91 FACE 39877 After the pump was started, the mechanic noticed the walkway on the South side of the clarifier had dropped lower than the rest of the walkway. After further inspection, we found the wall was bowed out a considerable amount. I notified Bill McCain and asked if he could come look at the problem with the wall. Bill looked at the wall and started thinking of ways to keep the wall from moving any more. Jerry Schuckers and Emory Bailes both came up with some good ideas to keep the wall from shifting further South. We presented our ideas to Bill and he agreed that the important thing to do first was to support the wall from the outside. We had some large poles in stock and Ron Lefebure took charge of a four man crew to wedge poles against the South wall. Terry Pinto then instructed us to put poles at the bottom of the wedge poles to keep them from sinking into the ground. After Ron Lefebure's crew placed eleven poles in place, Mr. Pinto put Roland McNeal in charge of the operation. Roland brought in a D-7 dozer and pushed dirt on the poles to help hold them in place. After the dirt was pushed into place, the dozer was parked on the sloped dirt to help hold the poles. During the installation of the wedge poles, Bill notified Risk Management and the Fire Department of the problem. The guide rail and chain was repaired and the clarifier drive unit was operated to check for proper operation. The first time the unit was tested it worked, but then as the tank was being filled, the chain started to jam. The pump was placed back into position, and we started pumping the clarifier out again. During the inspection of the bottom of the clarifier, several big concrete rocks were found and a chunk of concrete was wedged in the chain. The chain had to be broken so that it could be put back on the lower Northwest sprocket. The drive unit was tested and we began to fill the tank. During the time of the repair to the clarifier, we had to store the raw inflow in our surge tank and spare digester. When both tanks became full, Ron Lefebure used the Data Flow system to shut down all the West County liftstations. During this time, six stations went into high level alarms, but there were no sewer back-ups. As the clarifier was being filled, the stations with the highest water level was pumped down first. The clarifier was full and back in operation by 10:30 p.m. Operator, Kevin Gibson, worked from 11:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m. to watch the clarij!ier operations and pump down the stored .300 gallons. A11'operations were back to normal by 9:00 a.m., Sunday. Below is a list of the County Wastewater crew that worked on Christmas day. As you saw for yourself, this is a hard working crew. When I called and asked them to come in, there were not any problems or complaints. Name Hours Worked Jim DeGraffenreid 15 Terry Southard 13 Emory Bailes 11.5 Jerry Schuckers 10 Ron Lefebure 10 Tom King 9 Kevin Gibson 8 Jerry Miller 6.5 Terry Foster 6 Kurt Steffen 6 John Mittendorf 4.5 36 Utility Services Director Terry Pinto distributed photographs of the subject treatment plant. He commended staff for identifying the problem, because otherwise the entire structure would have collapsed in a matter of hours. He expressed gratitude to the employees who worked until late in the evening on Christmas Day under severe conditions to make the emergency repairs. Director Pinto was uncertain whether the contractor that built the plant was still in business. He indicated that the repairs could cost anywhere from $50,000 to $250,000. Administrator Chandler echoed Director Pinto's sentiments that it was very fortunate that our personnel caught the problem and worked quickly to come up with a solution. He felt that everyone involved did a remarkable job. ON MOTION by Chairman Tippin, SECONDED by Commissioner Bird, the Board unanimously agreed to spread upon the Minutes of this meeting the gratitude of the Commission representing all of the people in this county for the willingness of County employees to turn out on Christmas Day and work under the most distressing and difficult conditions to contain the problem. MOTION WAS MADE by Commissioner Macht, SECONDED by Commissioner Eggert, to authorize staff to continue under emergency conditions to repair the structure and determine liability, as recommended by staff. Under discussion, Commissioner Macht asked what will be involved in correcting this problem. Director Pinto advised that the design is nearly completed on an independent plant at that site, and staff will move forward as quickly as possible with that project. He stressed that everything possible will be done to keep the current system operational until construction of the other system is completed. He predicted that repairing the structure will require rebuilding an internal wall and removing the entire outside wall and constructing a new one. Director Pinto then announced that Cindy White resigned from her position as franchise coordinator and moved to Kansas. He introduced her replacement, Ana Anderson, and he indicated that we were fortunate to find someone with utilities experience to fill the position. Commissioner Adams commented that Ms. Anderson speaks fluent Spanish. 37 4 1994 BOOK 91 UGE • .99 � , I ffi� Mo THE CHAIRMAN CALLED FOR THE QUESTION. It was voted on and carried unanimously. ANNUAL RESOLUTION CHANGING SIGNATORY FOR BANKS eooK 91 FaU 400 ON MOTION by Commissioner Macht, SECONDED by Commissioner Adams, the Board unanimously adopted Resolution 94-3, directing County depositories to honor certain authorized signatures on County warrants and other orders for payment. RESOLUTION NO. 94- 1 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, DIRECTING COUNTY DEPOSITORIES TO HONOR CERTAIN AUTHORIZED SIGNATURES ON COUNTY WARRANTS AND OTHER ORDERS FOR PAYMENT. WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County on January 4, 1994, held an election for the offices of Chairman and Vice Chairman of the Board of County Commissioners; and WHEREAS, the County Commission did nominate and select as Chairman John W. Tippin, and as Vice Chairman Kenneth R. Macht; and WHEREAS, Jeffrey K. Barton was elected Clerk of the Circuit Court of Indian River County effective December 31, 1988, also serves as a Clerk to the Board of County Commissioners, pursuant to Section 125.167, Florida Statutes; and WHEREAS, it is now necessary to reinstruct the County's depositories as to the signatures necessary to honor County warrants, checks, or other orders for the payment of money drawn in the Commission's name, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA that: 38 1. The County Commission has in the past designated certain Institutions as official depositories of County funds, and such designations are hereby ratified and affirmed. 2. Each designated depository of the Commission is hereby requested, authorized, and directed to honor checks, warrants, or other orders for payment of money drawn in the Commission's name, including those payable to the individual orders of any person or persons whose name or names appear thereon, when bearing the facsimile signature of the Clerk of the Circuit Court, when said check, warrants, or other orders for the payment of money equals or does not exceed the sum of three thousand dollars ($3,000) . 3. If a check, warrant, or other orders for the payment of money drawn in the Commission's name exceeds the sum of three thousand dollars ($3,000), said designated depositories are authorized ° and directed to honor checks, warrants, or other orders for payment of money drawn in the Commission's name, only when such check, warrant, or other orders for payment of money bears the facsimile signature of the Chairman and Clerk of the Circuit Court and further bears the original signature of either the Chairman, Vice Chairman, Clerk of the Circuit Court, or Deputy Clerk, listed below. Said actual and facsimile signatures appear below: (1) Jeffrey K. Barton Clerk of Circuit Court � (2) Cynthia Gatt Deputy Clerk (3) Mary Louise Scheidt Deputy Clerk (4) John W. Tippin Chairman (5) Kenneth R. Macht Vice Chairman Actual " A6tual '� r � 39 JAN 4 1994 BOOK 91 BOOK 91 PAGE -I402 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the above named signatories are hereby authorized to execute any and all signature cards and agreements as requested by the respective banking institutions designated as official depositories by the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the use of facsimile signatures is as authorized by Section 116.34, Florida Statutes, the "Uniform Facsimile Signature of Public Officials Act." The resolution was moved to adoption by Commissioner a c ht and the motion was seconded by Commissioner Adams and, upon being put to a vote, the vote was as follows: Chairman John W. Tippin Aye Vice Chairman Kenneth R. Macht Aye Commissioner Richard N. Bird Aye Commissioner Carolyn K.' Eggert Aye Commissioner Fran B. Adams Aye The Chairman thereupon declared the resolution duly passed and adopted this 4th day of January, 1994. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Attest: INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA By Jeffrey K. Barton, Clef John W. Tippin Y . ' ��,tiy�� l� • \Chairman SALARY LEVELS FOR COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR AND COUNTY ATTORNEY Commissioner Bird recounted that a 25% increase for County employees, effective January 1, 1994, was included in the budget for the 1993-94 Fiscal Year. Administrator Chandler and Attorney Vitunac were not included in that increase, because the County's contracts with those individuals provide for their increases to be negotiated with the Board. Commissioner Bird felt that both of them have done an excellent job during the past year, and he 40 suggested that we give each of them a 2% increase, effective January 1, 1994, consistent with the increase given to the other County employees. Commissioner Adams asked whether this will require a budget amendment, and Administrator Chandler indicated that sufficient funds are available in the salary account to accommodate these increases due to savings in other areas. For example, the position of Administrative Assistant to the County Administrator is vacant at this time. ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED by Commissioner Eggert, the Board unanimously approved a 2% increase for Administrator Chandler and Attorney Vitunac effective January 1, 1994. HABITAT HUMANITY REQUEST The Board reviewed the following memo and attachment from Bill Elliott, representing Habitat for Humanity: S grS,�,t /.v ,ryas . /•ox_.. /N['�iVT/�!,E .... __.— aAs/ t n i, .c .. too riiH�c.�.cs -NV! J 1. p - At/4 rep r . II !!}_.'�L..!4_..�'/�S"Ar.-4, � n.TrV+4�'_ 41 JAN � 4 1994 goaX 91 FaE 403 � J R TO QUALIFY AS A SPONSOR, YOUR ORGANIZATION IS REQUIRED TO MEET THE FOLLOWING CRITERIA: ■ Bea non-profit corporation or a unit of state or local government. ■ Have a project to construct, improve, or substantially rehabili- tate housing, commercial, indus- trial, or public facilities, or to pro- mote entrepreneurial or job devel- opment opportunities. ■ Be willing to receive contribu- tions from eligible.corporate do - !r m P ■ Be located in one of the follow- ing areas: • A slum and blighted area, as de- fined in Section 163.355, Florida Statutes • A Neighborhood Housing Serv- ices Area • An Historic Preservation District • An Enterprise Zone • A Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) target area • A Conservation Community (among the 20 percent most dis- tressed in the state). The Depart- ment of Community Affairs has a list of qualifying areas. • A Housing Authority site How TO BECOME - A COMMUNITY CONTRIBUTION TAX INCENTIVE SPONSOR • An Urban Development Action Grant (UDAG) "pocket of pov- erty" area ' • A Housing and Urban Develop- ment (HUD) "area of chronic eco- nomic distress" TO BECOME A SPONSOR, YOUR ORGANIZATION SUBMITS A PROPOSAL TO THE DEPART- MENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS CONTAINING THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION: ■ A copy of your organization's by-laws, articles of incorporation, charter, or other documentation of non-profit status. BOOK 91 PAGE 404 ■ A project narrative describing the eligible activity and listing the types of contributions to besought and their intended use. ■ Documentation of the eligibil- ity of the area. This can be a map showing the eligible area and an approval letter documenting the area as eligible. ■ "'A resolution from the local government stating that the proj- ect is consistent with local plans and regulations. Once your project has received written approval from the Depart- ment of Community Affairs, you may begin accepting eligible con- tributions. Project approval ex- pires June 30 of each year. A spon- sor must be recertified for each subsequent year of eligibility. M r ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED by Commissioner Eggert, the Board unanimously agreed to provide a letter of support stating that the plans of Habitat for Humanity are consistent with County plans and regulations. 42 _I OWNERSHIP OF ABANDONED DUBOSE CEMETERY IN GIFFORD The Board reviewed the following memo dated December 28, 1993: TO: Board of County Commissioners FROM: Terrence P. O'Brien, Assistant County Attorney DATE:. December 28, 1993 RE: OWNERSHIP OF CEMETERY IN GIFFORD BACKGROUND There is an abandoned cemetery in Gifford located north of 45th Street between 28th Court and 29th Avenue near Middle Sixth and Middle Seventh. Several months ago Commissioner Eggert asked this office for a report on the ownership of this land. Recently, I have been contacted by G. Russell Petersen, . Attorney for the School Board, as to ownership of the property as the School Board may have an interest due to the proximity of the land to the schools.. Several days ago Commissioner Adams expressed an interest in the land and possible County uses. In view of the several interests, staff feels that the matter should be reviewed by the full Board and direction given to the staff as how to proceed. HISTORY OF OWNERSHIP The record title holder of the above described property is shown as the Vero Beach Cemetery Association, Inc., a corporation not for profit. A search of Florida corporate records does not show this as viable corporation or any past history as a corporation. The Vero Beach Cemetery Association Inc. obtained title from Vero Beach Burial Park Inc. by deed dated July 7, 1941. Vero Beach Burial Park obtained title from Florida Burial Park Inc. by deed dated February 15, 1929. There Is no record of a Vero Beach Burial Park Inc. in the corporate records of the state of Florida. Florida Burial Park Inc. appears to have been dissolved December 14, 1936. In order to trace the history, the following table may be easier to follow than the narrative above. Florida Burial Park, Inc. - Root of Title to Vero Beach Burial Park, Inc. - Deed February 15, 1929 to Vero Beach Cemetery Association, Inc. - Deed July '7, 1941 The 1941 Quitclaim deed from Vero Beach Burial Park to the Vero Beach Cemetery Association list as trustees of the Vero Beach Burial Park Company J.C. DuBose, A.E. DuBose, and O.L. DuBose. There are no references available as to the officers or directors of the current record title holder Vero Beach Cemetery Association Inc. or that it ever existed as a corporation. Because of the declared not for profit status that attached to this property it has never been on the tax roles. Therefore, the usual situation where abandoned property gets sold for taxes does not apply here. 43 JAN 4 1994 BOOK 91 Ft4jc. 495 Fr_ JAN 4 1994 BOOK 91 FACF 406 LEGAL TITLE It appears that there is no one that can claim ownership to the property. Further, under Section 95.12, F.S., no action to recover real property or its possession shall be maintained unless the person seeking recovery was seized or possessed of the property within seven years before the commencement of the action. The cemetery apparently has been abandoned for many years so that there is no person eligible to seek possession. Courses of Action L Pursuant to Section 497.071, Florida Statutes, the County could take over the abandoned cemetery and maintain the property. The County could then place on the public records its notice of intent to maintain the cemetery and to take title pursuant to Chapter 95, F.S.. 2. Pursuant to Section 497.071, F. S . , the County could take over the abandoned cemetery and maintain the property. At any time after taking possession, the County could quit -claim all or a portion of the cemetery to the School Board. The School Board would therefore have possession of the property under color of title. 3. Do nothing. Commissioner Eggert explained that this item was to have been included on the agenda for next week's meeting, but things are happening so quickly that she decided to put it on the agenda today. It has been reported that people are drinking alcohol and using drugs on the property. Since nobody is claiming ownership, she suggested that the County take over the cemetery as abandoned property. In the meantime, a suggestion has come to use part of the property for a creative playground under the leadership of the Community Oriented Police Enforcement (COPE) program. Commissioner Eggert recounted that creative playgrounds were built by members of the community in Sebastian and in Vero Beach. She stressed that the creative playground in Sebastian cost about $80,000, so this is not something to be taken lightly. She felt it would be a good idea to discuss the use of this property with the School Board, but she would like to see the front 3 acres set aside for a creative playground and a Martin Luther King memorial. She asked for the Board's conceptual approval to go forward with taking over the property. She indicated that the cemetery will be searched for bodies tomorrow and if any are found they will be relocated. Administrator Chandler reported that he discussed the property with Dr. Gary Norris, superintendent of the School District, who indicated that the School Board has an interest in the entire 10 - acre site. Attorney Vitunac asked for the Board's direction on publishing notices in the newspaper saying that the County is claiming title and putting up signs stating that the County is asserting control over the property. 44 MOTION WAS MADE by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED by Commissioner Eggert, to direct the County Attorney to do whatever is necessary to claim the property, and to direct staff to continue discussions with the School Board. Under discussion, Attorney Vitunac advised that it will take 7 years to get a good title to the property. Any improvements made during those 7 years would be at risk. Commissioner Bird felt it would be exciting for the community to put a playground in Gifford, and that it would be logical to build it at that location near the schools. However, he would like some additional input from the people in the community about whether they would rather have the playground there or in Gifford Park. His feeling was that it might be better to make it part of Gifford Park. He cautioned the Board to keep in mind that all of this is going to cost money. He was also concerned about possible problems that might be encountered as far as removing the bodies is concerned. Commissioner Adams got the impression from a number of residents that they would prefer to keep the facilities separate. Commissioner Eggert understood that COPE representatives have been discussing this with people in the community, and they seem to think that the abandoned cemetery might be a better location for a playground, because the magnet school and COPE office are in that area. She indicated that plans for a creative playground would have to go through the Parks and Recreation Committee and be coordinated with the Gifford Progressive League. Commissioner Tippin commented that this used to be the only cemetery in town, but there was a massive exodus when Crestlawn opened in the early 1940s. He thought there must be some records somewhere about all of this. Lengthy discussion ensued, and Assistant County Attorney Terry O'Brien assured the Board that the County cannot be held liable in any way if we decide to take over and maintain the property. He emphasized that taking this first step is not "crossing the Rubicon." THE CHAIRMAN CALLED FOR THE QUESTION. It was voted on and carried unanimously. 45 BOOK 91 F,1CF, 4.07 JAN 4 1994 BOOK 91 PAGE 408 JOINT MEETING BETWEEN CHILDREN'S SERVICES ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEMBERS, BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSION, AND SCHOOL BOARD The Board reviewed the following memo dated December 27, 1993: DATE DECEMBER 27, 1992 TO BOARD -OF COUNTY COMMISSION�%yI FROM KENNETH R. MACHT, COUNTY COMMISSIONER RE JOINT MEETING BETWEEN CHILDREN'S SERVICES ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEMBERS, BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSION, AND SCHOOL BOARD I would like to request a joint meeting between the Children's Services Advisory Committee members, the Board of County Commissioners and the Indian River County School Board to present to the Commission and the public through television some of the underlying problems that plague our community. Many of the policy and .fiscal .decisions required An the coming year require an extensive background of information of this nature. .1 .'am -.proposing. the -meeting for either _ morning - or afternoon on Friday, January ..28, 1994 or Monday, January 31, 1994. The meeting can be held in the School Board meeting room and will be televised from there. Commissioner Macht asked the Board members if they would be agreeable to scheduling a meeting on January 31, 1994, at 9:00 a.m. in the School Board meeting office. Representatives of the School District would give a presentation at that time in order to give us an idea of drug usage by young people and related difficulties. We would discuss with members of the School Board some of the serious problems that exist not only in the schools but throughout the community. Commissioner Macht explained that the idea is not to overwhelm us with statistics, but to make us aware of the kinds of things that are going on. He predicted that the Commissioners will find some of the information distressing. He asked the Board's permission to organize the meeting and arrange to have it televised. MOTION WAS MADE by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by Commissioner Adams, to schedule a joint televised meeting between the Children's Services Advisory Committee members, the Board of County Commissioners, and the Indian River County School Board, on January 31, 1994, at 9:00 a.m. in the School Board meeting room. 46 Under discussion, Commissioner Bird indicated that he has gotten meaningful input from the Florida Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services (HRS) in the past, and he suggested that we might want to invite a representative of that agency to attend the meeting. Commissioner Eggert recalled an HRS study a couple of years ago, but she did not think they would have anything new to add to that study. Commissioner Macht felt at this time that we primarily are trying to find out the kind of things that children are into, but he agreed to look into the possibility of including an HRS representative in the meeting. THE CHAIRMAN CALLED FOR THE QUESTION. It was voted on and carried unanimously. COMMITTEE APPOINTMENTS ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED by Commissioner Eggert, the Board unanimously tabled this agenda item for one week. EMERGENCY SERVICES DISTRICT Chairman Tippin announced that immediately upon adjournment, the Board would reconvene sitting as the Board of Commissioners of the Emergency Services District. Those Minutes are being prepared separately. There being no further business, on Motion duly made, seconded and carried, the Board adjourned at 10:54 a.m. ATTEST: J. ton, Clerk Join W. Tippin, C a' man 47 JAN 19�� BOOK 91 FacF 409