The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About03/20/2018ORWt BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS INDIAN RIVER COUNTY FLORIDA COMMISSION AGENDA TUESDAY, MARCH 20, 2018 - 9:00 AM Commission Chambers Indian River County Administration Complex 180127th Street, Building A Vero Beach, Florida, 32960-3388 www.iregov.com COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Peter D. O'Bryan, Chairman, District 4 Jason E. Brown, County Administrator Bob Solari, Vice Chairman, District 5 Dylan Reingold, County Attorney Susan Adams, District 1 Jeffrey R. Smith, Clerk of the Circuit Court and Comptroller Joseph E. Flescher, District 2 Tim Zorc, District 3 1. CALL TO ORDER 2.A. A MOMENT OF SILENT REFLECTION FOR FIRST RESPONDERS 2.B. INVOCATION Pastor Kyle Bailey, Freedom Church 3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Commissioner Peter D. O'Bryan, Chairman 4. ADDITIONS/DELETIONS TO THE AGENDA / EMERGENCY ITEMS 5. PROCLAMATIONS and PRESENTATIONS 5.A. Presentation of Proclamation Designating April 1 through April 30, 2018 as Water Conservation Month in Indian River County 5.13. Presentation of Proclamation Designating the Week of March 18 Through 24, 2018, as National Surveyors Week 5.C. Presentation of Proclamation Designating April 15, 2018 as Jackie Robinson Day 6. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 7. INFORMATION ITEMS FROM STAFF OR COMMISSIONERS NOT REQUIRING BOARD ACTION March 20, 2018 Page 1 of 5 7.A. Proclamation Honoring Marla Goodman on Her Retirement From Indian River County Board of County Commissioners, Department of General Services, Library Services Division with Twelve Years of Service 7.B. Proclamation Honoring Edward M. McCullers on His Retirement From Indian River County Board of County Commissioners, Department of Utility Services, Wastewater Collection Division with Twenty -One Years of Service 7.C. Letter of Support for School District of Indian River County Grant Funding Request for Technical Center Expansion 8. CONSENT AGENDA 8.A. Checks and Electronic Payments March 2, 2018 to March 8, 2018 8.B. Release and Satisfaction of Demolition Lien (Lot 3, Block 8, Gifford School Park) 8.C. Work Order No. 3 - Dunkelberger Engineering & Testing, Inc. 58th Avenue Resurfacing/Reclamation From 26th Street to 49th Street Testing Services (IRC -1324) 8.D. Approval of Renewal for a Class "E" and Class "B" Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity for Falck Southeast II, Corp d/b/a All County Ambulance to Provide Wheelchair/Stretcher and Interfacility Ambulance Transportation Services 8.E. Approval of Renewal for a Class "B" Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity for Falck Southeast II, Corp d/b/a American Ambulance Service to Provide Interfacility Ambulance Transportation Services 8.F. Approval of a Public Transportation Supplemental Joint Participation Agreement (SJPA) with the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) to Continue Bus Service to the Indian River State College Main Campus (Fort Pierce) 8.G. Change Order No. 1 - Comprehensive Water, Wastewater, and Reclaimed (Reuse) Water Rate Study, and Water and Sewer Impact Fee Study 8.H. Miscellaneous Budget Amendment 009 8.I. Final Ranking of Contractors and Recommendation of Award of RFP 20018016 - Ansin Riverfront Conservation Area Boardwalks 8.1 Award of Annual Bid for Day Labor (Rebid) - Bid 2018035 8.K. Request for Board Approval of a Resolution for a Grant Application to the Florida Inland Navigation District for Public Use Improvements at the Jones' Pier Conservation Area 8.L. Children's Services Advisory Committee's Recommendation RFP #2018050 - New Focus Areas for 2018-19 and Sample Agency Contract 9. CONSTITUTIONAL OFFICERS and GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES March 20, 2018 Page 2 of 5 10. PUBLIC ITEMS A. PUBLIC HEARINGS 10.A.1. Kane Request to Rezone t 2.009 Acres, from RS -1 to RS -3 & f 4.827 Acres from RS -1 to CON -2 (RZON-2017080084-80032) (Quasi -Judicial) 10.A.2. Transmittal Public Hearing: County Initiated Request to Amend (Update) the Text of the Sanitary Sewer Sub -Element for Septic to Sewer Conversion and the Associated Text of the Future Land Use Element; and Amend the Text of the Coastal Management Element for Sea Level Rise and Associated Text of the Future Land Use Element of the County's Comprehensive Plan (Legislative) 10.A.3. Transmittal Public Hearing: County Initiated Request to Amend the Text of the Coastal Management Element and Future Land Use Element of the County's Comprehensive Plan Relating to Sea Level Rise (Legislative) B. PUBLIC DISCUSSION ITEMS C. PUBLIC NOTICE ITEMS 10.C.1. Notice of Scheduled Public Hearing for April 3, 2018: Ocean Trail, LLC's Request for Vacation of the Hideaway Cove Subdivision Plat [PVSD-79-04(221) / 2000120037-80175] (Legislative) 10.C.2. Notice of Scheduled Public Hearing for April 3, 2018: Ocean Trail, LLC's Request for Abandonment of the west 20 feet as shown as additional right-of-way dedication, on the plat of Hideaway Cove Subdivision [ROWA-17-11-05 / 2000120037-80055] (Legislative) 11. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR MATTERS 12. DEPARTMENTAL MATTERS A. Community Development B. Emergency Services C. General Services 1. Human Services 2. Sandridge Golf Club 3. Recreation D. Human Resources E. Office of Management and Budget F. Public Works 12.F.1. Final Update on the Pilot Plant Study for a Full -Scale Managed Aquatic Plant Pollutant Removal System Treating Water from the North Relief Canal March 20, 2018 Page 3 of 5 G. Utilities Services 13. COUNTY ATTORNEY MATTERS 13.A. Resolution Supporting Rail Safety Study 14. COMMISSIONERS MATTERS A. Commissioner Peter D. O'Bryan, Chairman B. Commissioner Bob Solari, Vice Chairman C. Commissioner Susan Adams D. Commissioner Joseph E. Flescher E. Commissioner Tim Zorc 15. SPECIAL DISTRICTS AND BOARDS A. Emergency Services District 15:A.1. Approval of Minutes Meeting of January 16, 2018 15.A.2. Renewal of Letter of Agreement for Critical Incident -Stress Management Consultation (CISM) Services 15.A.3. Fire Station #14: Bill of Sale of Utility Facilities - Water and Sewer B. Solid Waste Disposal District 15.13.1. Request to Approve Agreement with Comtech Systems for Communication Equipment Testing at the Indian River County Landfill C. Environmental Control Board 16. ADJOURNMENT March 20, 2018 Page 4 of 5 Except for those matters specifically exempted under the State Statute and Local Ordinance, the Board shall provide an opportunity for public comment prior to the undertaking by the Board of any action on the agenda, including those matters on the Consent Agenda. Public comment shall also be heard on any proposition which the Board is to take action which was either not on the Board agenda or distributed to the public prior to the commencement of the meeting. Anyone who may wish to appeal any decision which may be made at this meeting will need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made which includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal will be based. Anyone who needs a special accommodation for this meeting may contact the County's Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Coordinator at (772) 226-1223 at least 48 hours in advance of meeting. Anyone who needs special accommodation with a hearing aid for this meeting may contact the Board of County Commission Office at 772-226-1490 at least 20 hours in advance of the meeting. The full agenda is available on line at the Indian River County Website at www.ircizov.com The full agenda is also available for review in the Board of County Commission Office, the Indian River County Main Library, and the North County Library. Commission Meetings are broadcast live on Comcast Cable Channel 27 Rebroadcasts continuously with the following proposed schedule: Tuesday at 6:00 p.m. until Wednesday at 6:00 a.m., Wednesday at 9:00 a.m. until 5:00 p.m., Thursday at 1:00 p.m. through Friday Morning, and Saturday at 12: 00 Noon to 5:00 p.m. March 20, 2018 Page 5 of 5 PROCLAMATION DESIGNATING APRIL 1 THROUGH APRIL 30, 2018 AS WATER CONSERVATION MONTH IN INDIAN RIVER COUNTY WHEREAS, water is a basic and essential need of every living creature; and WHEREAS, The State of Florida, Water Management Districts and Indian River County are working together to increase awareness about the importance of water conservation; and WHEREAS, Indian River County and the State of Florida have designated April, typically a dry month when water demands are most acute, Florida's Water Conservation Month, to educate citizens about how they can help save Florida's precious water resources; and WHEREAS, Indian River County has always encouraged and supported water conservation, through various educational programs and special events; and WHEREAS, every business, industry, school and citizen can make a difference when it comes to conserving water; and NOW THEREFORE, BE IT PROCLAIMED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, that the month of April 2018 be designated as WATER CONSERVATION MONTH in Indian River County, and all citizens and business are encouraged to help protect our precious resource by practicing water saving measures and becoming more aware of the need to save water. Adopted this 20th day of March, 2018. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA Peter D. O'Bryan, Chairman Bob Solari, Vice Chairman Susan Adams Joseph E. Flescher Tim Zorc 1 S.A. S 6 PROCLAMATION DESIGNATING THE WEEK OF MARCH 18 THROUGH 24, 2018, AS NATIONAL SURVEYORS WEEK WHEREAS, land surveyors are counted among the founding leaders of our county and were instrumental in the formation of the layout of property boundaries in the United States, providing our citizens the opportunity to enjoy the American dream of property ownership; and, WHEREAS, United States Presidents George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, John Adams, and Abraham Lincoln all served as surveyors, contributing to the historical mapping of America in its early years; and, WHEREAS, the surveying profession requires special education, training, the knowledge of mathematics, the related physical and applied sciences, and requirements of law for evidence; and, WHEREAS, surveyors are uniquely qualified and licensed to determine and describe land and water boundaries for the management of natural resources and protection of private and public property rights; and, WHEREAS, the continual advancements in instrumentation have required the surveyor to not only be able to understand and implement the methods of the past, but also to learn and employ modern technology in finding solutions to meet the challenges of time; and, WHEREAS, the citizens of Indian River County recognize the valuable contributions of the surveying profession to history, development, and quality of life throughout our country, and make important decisions based on the knowledge and expertise of licensed surveyors and mappers. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT PROCLAIMED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA that the week of March 18 through 24, 2018, be designated as "NATIONAL SURVEYORS WEEK" in Indian River County, and the Board encourages all citizens to recognize the many contributions and the ongoing dedication of surveyors to our community and throughout the United States. Adopted this 20th day of March, 2018. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA Peter D. O'Bryan, Chairman Bob Solari, Vice Chairman Susan Adams Joseph E. Flescher Tim Zorc 2 PROCLAMATION DESIGNATING APRIL 15, 2018 AS JACKIE ROBINSON DAY WHEREAS, April 15, 2018 will mark the 71st anniversary of Jackie Robinson making his Major League debut with the Brooklyn Dodgers as he broke the color barrier in 1947 to become the first African-American to play Major League Baseball; and WHEREAS, Jackie Robinson spent nine Spring Trainings (1948-56) at Dodgertown, Vero Beach and the Dodgers advanced to the World Series five times in those years; and WHEREAS, In 1948 Dodgertown became the first and only integrated Spring Training site in the South; and WHEREAS, Major and Minor League Baseball celebrates Jackie Robinson Day nationally each April 15th; and WHEREAS, Mr. Pat O'Conner, Minor League Baseball President & CEO, said "Minor League Baseball is proud to be part of this annual celebration in Vero Beach as we play a game at Historic Dodgertown to honor him."; and WHEREAS, the fifth annual Jackie Robinson Celebration game will take place on Sunday, April 15, 2018, in Holman Stadium when the St Lucie Mets host the Dunedin Blue Jays to benefit a worthy cause, the United Way of Indian River County; and WHEREAS, the cost of this Minor League Baseball game is kept low so that it can be a true community -wide celebration. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT PROCLAIMED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA that the Board designates April 15, 2018, as Jackie Robinson Day, and hereby congratulates Major League Baseball on its work and success in Indian River County over the past 70 years. Adopted this 20th day of March, 2018. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA Peter D. O'Bryan, Chairman Bob Solari, Vice Chairman Susan Adams Joseph E. Flescher Tim Zorc 3 C. IA PROCLAMATION HONORING MARLA R. GOODMAN ON HER RETIREMENT FROM INDIANRIVER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS DEPARTMENT OF GENERAL SERVICES, LIBRARY SERVICES DIVISION Marla R. Goodman retired from Indian River County Library Services Division effective March 25, 2018, and WHEREAS, Marla R. Goodman began her career with Indian River County on July 21, 2006, as a Library Associate H and remained in that position until her retirement; and WHEREAS, Marla R. Goodman has served this County and Public with distinction and selflessness. She worked tirelessly with Young Adults through her volunteer program and provided our community with quality programming for Young Adults and Adults alike. During her almost twelve (12) years of service, her work was appreciated by her employer, citizens, and co-workers alike; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT PROCLAIMED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that the Board applauds Marla R. Goodman's efforts on behalf of the County, and the Board wishes to express their appreciation for the dedicated service she has given to Indian River County; and BE IT FURTHER PROCLAIMED that the Board of County Commissioners and staff extend heartfelt wishes for success in her future endeavors! Adopted this 20th day of ?►?arch 2018. `J BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS C� INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA �lpRroA Peter O'Biyan, Chair n 7 PROCLAMATION HONORING EDWARD M. MCCULLERS ONHIS RETIREMENT FROM INDIAN RIVER COUNTYBOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS DEPARTMENT OF UTILITY SERVICESIWASTEWATER COLLECTION DIVISION WHEREAS, Edward McCullers retired from Indian River County Wastewater Collection Division effective March 29, 2018; and WHEREAS, Edward McCullers began his career with Indian River County on July 11, 1997, as a Heavy Equipment Operator I in the Solid Waste Division. He was transferred to the Water Production Division as a Utilities Service Worker on November 28, 1997, and to the Wastewater Collection Division as a Utilities Service Worker on February 4, 2000. On May 29, 2015, he was promoted to Lift Station Mechanic, where he continued in that capacity until his retirement, and WHEREAS, Edward McCullers has served this County and the Public with distinction and selflessness. During his twenty-one years of service, he was dedicated, and his work was greatly appreciated by the employer, citizens, and co-workers alike, and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT PROCLAIMED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY. COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that the Board applauds Edward McCuller's efforts on behalf of the County, and the Board wishes to express their appreciation for the dedicated service he has given to Indian River Countyfor the last twenty-one years; and BE IT FURTHER PROCLAIMED that the Board of County Commissioners and staff extend heartfelt wishes for success in his future endeavors! Adopted this 20th day of March, 2018. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS INDIANRIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA Peter D. O'Bryan, CWairman BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Peter D. O'Bryan District 4 Chairman Bob Solari District 5 Vice -Chairman The Honorable Rick Scott Office of the Governor State of Florida -The Capitol 400 S. Monroe Street Tallahassee, FL 32399-0001 RE: Florida Job Growth Grant Fund Public Infrastructure Grant Dear Governor Scott, March 12, 2018 Susan Adams District 1 Tim Zorc District 3 Joseph E. Flescher District 2 On March 6, 2018, the Indian River County Board of County Commissioners voted unanimously to support the School District of Indian River County's grant proposal for the "'Expansion of the Technical Center for Career and Adult Education" project under the Florida Job Growth Grant Fund. This project will provide access to training high need, high wage jobs. Currently there is not a postsecondary institution in our community that offers these training programs, so the School District is stepping up to meet these needs. The Technical Center already offers career paths in the Healthcare field, with the expansion, it will also provide industrial workforce training, such as welding and building construction technologies, including plumbing, electrical, carpentry, and HVAC. These programs will be available to high school students through a dual enrollment agreement and to adults in our community. Parts of our county have high levels of poverty. This is an opportunity to break the cycles of generational poverty and provide a pathway out of poverty for residents who have been unable to access workforce training programs. Job training will lead to employment in a job market searching for a skilled workforce and growth for local businesses as well as financial stability for families. The Board believes that this project is vital to the betterment of our community, local businesses, and our students. Sincerely, ?X& I L ) 4 1 �Ii' 3-- � Peter D. O'Bryan, Chairman Indian .River County Board of County Commissioners 1801 27'' Street, Building A Vero Beach, FL 32960 (772) 226-1490 6 Z C. ' JEFFREY R. SMITH, CPA, CGFO, CGMA i Clerk of Circuit Court &: Comptroller Finance Department I 1801 271" Street Vero Beach, FL 32960 - �COMpT'.. �yq�y\, �k COUNty Ey TO: HONORABLE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS FROM: ELISSA NAGY, FINANCE DIRECTOR THRU: JEFFREY R. SMITH, COMPTROLLER DATE: March 8, 2018 SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF CHECKS AND ELECTRONIC PAYMENTS March 2. 2018 to March 8, 2018 In compliance with Chapter 136.06, Florida Statutes, all checks and electronic payments issued by the Board of County Commissioners are to be recorded in the Board minutes. Approval is requested for the attached Iists of checks and electronic payments, issued by the Comptroller's office, for the time period of March 2, 2018 to March 8, 2018. 7 CHECKS WRITTEN TRANS NBR DATE VENDOR AMOUNT 364427 03/02/2018 SSES INC 394,186.82 364428 03/02/2018 MARRIOTT FT LAUDERDALE NORTH 786.00 364429 03/02/2018 MARRIOTT FT LAUDERDALE NORTH 786.00 364430 03/08/2018 CATHCOINC 6,828.57 364431 03/08/2018 PORT CONSOLIDATED INC 2,037.72 364432 03/08/2018 JORDAN MOWER INC 4,139.97 364433 03/08/2018 COMMUNICATIONS INTERNATIONAL 342,887.96 364434 03/08/2018 TEN -8 FIRE EQUIPMENT INC 1,028.79 364435 03/08/2018 RANGER CONSTRUCTION IND INC 957.81 364436 03/08/2018 VERO CHEMICAL DISTRIBUTORS INC 788.60 364437 03/08/2018 RICOH USA INC 108.00 364438 03/08/2018 SAFETY PRODUCTS INC 443.21 364439 03/08/2018 DATA FLOW SYSTEMS INC 6.636.00 364440 03/08/2018 PARALEE COMPANY INC 955.00 364441 03/08/2018 E -Z BREW COFFEE & BOTTLE WATER SVC 31.44 364442 03/08/2018 GRAINGER 347.08 364443 03/08/2018 AMERIGAS EAGLE PROPANE LP 391.39 364444 03/08/2018 AMERIGAS EAGLE PROPANE LP 1.886.11 364445 03/08/2018 GAYLORD BROTHERS INC 233.72 364446 03/08/2018 HACH CO 6,284.00 364447 03/08/2018 LFI FORT PIERCE INC 1,503.63 364448 03/08/2018 PARKSON CORPORATION 486.39 364449 03/08/2018 BOUND TREE MEDICAL LLC 8,114.89 364450 03/08/2018 PETES CONCRETE 3,700.00 364451 03/08/2018 VERO INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY INC 119.09 364452 03/08/2018 EXPRESS REEL GRINDING INC 2,900.00 364453 03/08/2018 TIRESOLES OF BROWARD INC 3,030.68 364454 03/08/2018 MOTION INDUSTRIES INC 1,104.31 364455 03/08/2018 H C WARNER INC 321.51 364456 03/08/2018 CITY ELECTRIC SUPPLY 1.0.19.12 364457 03/08/2018 CHILDCARE RESOURCES OF IRC INC 21.911.11 364458 03/08/2018 DELL MARKETING LP 1,557.00 364459 03/08/2018 ABC CONCRETE CUTTING INC 829.15 364460 03/08/2018 THE GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER COMPANY 147.00 364461 03/08/2018 BLAKESLEE SERVICES INC 645.00 364462 03/08/2018 BAKER & TAYLOR INC 7,772.63 364463 03/08/2018 ALL COUNTY MOWER AND EQUIPMENT CORP 10.85 364464 03/08/2018 MIDWEST TAPE LLC 1,849.80 364465 03/08/2018 MWI CORP 1.166.57 364466 03/08/2018 MICROMARKETING LLC 242.51 364467 03/08/2018 K & M ELECTRIC SUPPLY 73.50 364468 03/08/2018 BAKER DISTRIBUTING CO LLC 184.92 364469 03/08/2018 CENGAGE LEARNING INC 296.61 364470 03/08/2018 CLERK OF CIRCUIT COURT 50.00 364471 03/08/2018 CITY OF VERO BEACH 50,558.58 364472 03/08/2018 CHAPTER 13 TRUSTEE 201.08 364473 03/08/2018 COMPBENEFITS COMPANY 80.16 364474 03/08/2018 INDIAN RIVER ALL FAB INC 359.60 364475 03/08/2018 FERGUSON ENTERPRISES INC 1,506.00 364476 03/08/2018 JANITORIAL DEPOT OF AMERICA INC 276.78 364477 03/08/2018 FLORIDA DEPT OF EDUCATION 248.53 364478 03/08/2018 ACUSHNET COMPANY 4,073.89 364479 03/08/2018 FLORIDA WATER & POLLUTION CONTROL 325.00 364480 03/08/2018 .FLORIDA WATER & POLLUTION CONTROL 405.00 364481 03/08/2018 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 19.92 364482 03/08/2018 CALLAWAY GOLF SALES COMPANY 1,584.14 364483 03/08/2018 FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT 18,859.72 364484 03/08/2018 .FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT 2,018.39 TRANS NBR DATE VENDOR AMOUNT 364485 03/08/2018 FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT 983.63 364486 03/08/2018 GIFFORD YOUTH ACHIEVEMENT CENTER INC 21,365.52 364487 03/08/2018 PEACE RIVER ELECTRIC COOP INC 29.78 364488 03/08/2018 DENNIS THOMPSON 35.00 364489 03/08/2018 CATHOLIC CHARITIES DIOCESE OF PALM BCH 1,921.60 364490 03/08/2018 NATIONAL ASSOC OF COUNTY PARK 90.00 364491 03/08/2018 KENNETH JAMES BINGHAM JR 100.00 364492 03/08/2018 ALAN C KAUFFMANN 220.00 364493 03/08/2018 THE FLORIDA BAR 150.00 364494 03/08/2018 JOHN BROWN & SONS INC 3.000.00 364495 03/08/2018 KEEP INDIAN RIVER BEAUTIFUL INC 7,403.79 364496 03/08/2018 MICHAEL REDSTONE 69.00 364497 03/08/2018 ALBERT SANSONE 5.00 364498 03/08/2018 ECONOLITE CONTROL PRODUCTS INC 13,275.00 364499 03/08/2018 PELICAN ISLAND AUDUBON SOCIETY INC 3,600.27 364500 03/08/2018 THE PALMS AT VERO BEACH 500.00 364501 03/08/2018 RUSSELL PAYNE INC 1,125.60 364502 03/08/2018 CELICO PARTNERSHIP 156.10 364503 03/08/2018 U S BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION 944.69 364504 03/08/2018 VAN WAL INC 865.00 364505 03/08/2018 BLUE PLANET ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS INC 513.00 364506 03/08/2018 S)tNAGRO-W-%A%T INC 33,715.38 364507 03/08/2018 M T CAUSLEY INC 30.902.75 364508 03/08/2018 FLORIDA SECTION AMERICAN WATER WORKS 95.00 364509 03/08/2018 MBV ENGINEERING INC 3,170.00 364510 03/08/2018 CENTRAL PUMP & SUPPLY INC 8.03 364511 03/08/2018 MASTELLER & MOLER INC 26_.984.50 364512 03/08/2018 ETR LLC 159.12 364513 03/08/2018 JOHN SCOTT DAILEY 85.00 364514 03/08/2018 JOHN SCO'T'T DAILEY 520.00 364515 03/08/2018 STAPLES CONTRACT & COMMERCIAL INC 797.15 364516 03/08/2018 ADMIN FOR CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT 288.17 364517 03/08/2018 ADMIN FOR CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT 292.07 364518 03/08/2018 ADMIN FOR CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT 162.97 364519 03/08/2018 SEBASTIAN RIVER AREA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE 6.962.13 364520 03/08/2018 GARY L EMBREY 80.00 364521 03/08/2018 RF CONCRETE CONSTRUCTION INC 6,950.00 364522 03/08/2018 FLORIDA SUPERIOR SAND INC 985.67 364523 03/08/2018 JOHNNY B SMITH 190.00 364524 03/08/2018 MENTAL HEALTH ASSOCIATION IRC INC 200.00 364525 03/08/2018 C14ARLES A WALKER 120.00 364526 03/08/2018 MATTHEW ROTH 500.00 364527 03/08/2018 REDLANDS CHRISTIAN MIGRANT ASSOC 4,401.74 364528 03/08/2018 MICHAEL KORPAR 60.00 364529 03/08/2018 TIIE QUICK FIX 370.92 364530 03/08/2018 K'S COMMERCIAL CLEANING 925.00 364531 03/08/2018 LISA PAITON 11.80 364532 03/08/2018 NICOLACE MARKETING INC 199.00 364533 03/08/2018 MCALHANY CONSTRUCTION CO INC 42,300.00 364534 03/08/2018 WEST CONSTRUCTION INC 133..166.07 364535 03/08/2018 DE LA HOZ BUILDERS INC 9.476.00 364536 03/0812018 WATERTRONICS TECHNICAL SERVICES 2.681.00 364537 03/0812018 ECMC 276.58 364538 03/08/2018 FLORIDA ARMATURE WORKS INC 14,302.43 364539 03/08/2018 JOSEPH CATALANO 80.00 364540 03108/2018 CIT FINANCE LLC 186.21 364541 03/08/2018 KEITH GROCHOLL 60.00 364542 03/08/2018 MOORE MOTORS INC 318.33 364543 03/08/2018 LOWES HOME CENTERS INC 1,895.50 364544 03/08/2018 ALADTEC TNC 10.986.00 9 TRANS NBR DATE VENDOR AMOUNT 364545 03/08/2018 STEP I-IANIE 1VATCHEK FOUNTAIN TRUST 223.00 364546 03/08/2018 RAFTELIS FINANCIAL CONSULTANTS INC 14,192.00 364547 03/08/2018 GAUDET ASSOCIATES INC 725.00 364548 03/08/2018 GAUDET ASSOCIATES INC 1,020.03 364549 03/08/2018 CARDINAL HEALTH 110 INC 818.61 364550 03/08/2018 MUNICIPAL EMERGENCY SERVICES INC 1,112.50 364551 03/08/2018 ADAMS FENCE 2 LLC 3,492.00 364552 03/08/2018 ALEX MI.KLO 130.00 364553 03/08/2018 TRV ADVEItI'1STING & MARKETING INC 1,701.71 364554 03/08/2018 BURNETT LIME CO INC 3,190.60 364555 03/08/2018 PENGUIN RANDOM HOUSE LLC 110.85 364556 03/08/2018 CARMEN LEWIS 300.00 364557 03/08/2018 STRAIGHT OAK LLC 18.45 364558 03/08/2018 SEAN MAKI COMMUNICATIONS LLC 262.00 364559 03/08/2018 CALDWELL PACETTI EDWARDS 810.00 364560 03/08/2018 CH.EMTRADE CHEMICALS CORPORTATION 2,280.47 364561 03/08/2018 FAMI[_Y SUPPORT REGISTRY 156.45 364562 03/08/2018 TH E LAW OFFICES OF 631.00 364563 03/08/2018 R I G WILLIAMS LLC 500.00 364564 03/08/2018 INTEGRITY LAWNS LLC 1,750.00 364565 03/08/2018 PROFESSIONAL GOLF BALI. 4,183.25 364566 03/08/2018 CHADWICK PRESTON SMALLEY 2,936.00 364567 03/08/2018 RONALD NICHELSON 160.00 364568 03/08/2018 MASCHMEYER CONCRETE COMPANY OF FLORIDA 835.56 364569 03108/2018 HAWKINS INC 1,058.50 364570 03/08/2018 FLORITURF SOD INC 211.00 364571 03/08/2018 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY EXTENSION 256.06 364572 03/08/2018 KAMAN INDUSTRIAL TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION 9.956.80 364573 03/08/2018 SCRIPPS NP OPERATING LLC 1.371.49 364574 03/08/2018 JOSEPH DIZONNO 170.00 364575 03/08/2018 CATHEDRAL CORPORATION 17,671.94 364576 03/0812018 UNIFIRST CORPORATION 1,736.55 364577 03/08/20I8 SITEONE LANDSCAPE SUPPLY LLC 1,666.88 364578 03/08/2018 GOTTA GO GREEN ENTER.PISES INC 117.32 364579 03/08/2018 HYDROMAX USA LLC 39,426.30 364580 03/08/2018 ADVANCE STORES COMPANY INCORPORATED 74.26 364581 03/08/2018 GUARDIAN ALARM OF FLORIDA LLC 3,070.78 364582 03/08/2018 EGP DOCUMENT SOLUTIONS LLC 1,05953 364583 03/08/2018 RUSSELL L OWEN III 60.00 364584 03/08/2018 EZLINKS GOLF LLC 300.00 364585 03/08/2018 STEVES FROZEN CHILLERS OF FLORIDA SPACE COAS- 288.00 364586 03/08/2018 MAT14ESON TR[ -GAS .INC 10.810.80 364587 03/08/2018 PEOPLE READY INC 13,205.63 364588 03/08/2018 ROBERT 0 RICHARDSON III 120.00 364589 03/08/2018 COLE AUTO SUPPLY INC 453.16 364590 03/08/2018 RHOADES AIR & HEAT- 10.025.45 364591 03/08/2018 CANON FINANCIAL SERVICES INC 228.96 364592 03/08/20I8 KONICA MINOLTA BUSINESS SOLUTIONS 151.79 364593 03/08/2018 BETH NOLAN 75.00 364594 03/08/2018 GEORGE PEREZ 5.00 364595 03/0812018 DIANE LYSTLUND 486.40 364596 03108120I8 DAVE FORD PAINTING INC 4,575.00 364597 03/08/2018 ENV I RONMENTAL OPERATING SOLUSTIONS .INC 8,568.00 364598 03/08/2018 APTIM COASTAL PLANNING & ENGINEERING INC 38,676.99 364599 03/08/2018 GBlvIT INC 676.50 364600 03/08/2018 STUART RUBBER STAMP & SIGN CO.INC 90.76 364601 03/08/2018 CORE & MAIN LP 72.318.05 364602 03/08/2018 ERIC SK.ALA 168.00 364603 03/08/2018 MC DERMOTT WILL & EMERY LLP 10,000.00 364604 03/08/2018 STEWART \MATERIALS LLC 3,t37.78 10 TRANS NBR DATE VENDOR AMOUNT 364605 03/08/2018 GOMEZ BROTHERS IRRIGATION LLC 1,480.00 364606 03/08/2018 WOERNER AGRIBUSINESS LLC 466.00 364607 03/08/2018 THOMPSON TRACTOR CO INC 990.00 364608 03/08/2018 ABISCOM INC 879.98 364609 03/08/2018 COUGHS ROOFING & WATERPROOFING INC 26,973.33 364610 03/08/2018 LINDA CAGGIANO 128.65 364611 03/0812018 ALIBRIS 734.88 364612 03/08/2018 ARIENS COMPANY 5,701.80 364613 03/08/2018 DANE CONTRACTING INC 4,992.00 364614 03/08/2018 REXEL USA INC 3,306.90 364615 03/08/2018 MICHAEL MC LAUGHLIN 87.80 364616 03/08/2018 SHELBROUGH SAFETY LLC 2,340.00 364617 03/08/2018 CHANGE HEALTHCARE LLC 34,528.65 364618 03/08/2018 COASTAL BULB INC 2,060.83 364619 03/08/2.018 JOSEPH LORINO 120.00 364620 03/08/2018 WILSON & COMPANY INC 312.50 364621 03/08/2018 HEATHER SLEICHER 179.00 364622 03/08/2018 LEIGH ANNE CURLEY 66.01 364623 03/08/2018 FRANCINE GRIFFIN 165.38 364624 03/08/2018 SHANE BARRETT 35.00 364625 03/08/2018 BEST VERSION MEDIA LLC 488.00 364626 03/08/2018 SHAWN MC CLAIN 340.00 364627 03/08/2018 DIRECT TV 14.54 364628 03/08/2018 CHEER CONSTRUCTION GROUP LLC 5.00 364629 03/08/2018 FLORIDA DEPT OF STATE 810.00 364630 03/08/2018 STONES OF ITALY 2,350.00 Grand Total: 1,685,879.16 11 4 ELECTRONIC PAYMENT - VISA CARD TRANS. NBR DATE VENDOR AMOUNT 1012927 03105/2018 EVERGLADES FARM EQUIPMENT CO INC 2,513.01 1012928 03/05/2018 COLD AIR DISTRIBUTORS WAREHOUSE 519.42 1012929 03/05/2018 DEMCOINC 358.79 1012930 03/05/2018 APPLE INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY CO 839.82 1012931 03/05/2018 ALLIED UNIVERSAL CORP 5,430.13 1012932 03/05/2018 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DISTRIBUTORS INC 2.640.78 1012933 03/05/2018 ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION LABORATORIES IN 14,214.00 1012934 03/06/2018 AT&T 12;538.42 1012935 03/06/2018 OFFICE DEPOT BSD CUSTOMER SVC 2,518.66 1012936 03/06/2018 COMCAST 84.90 1012937 03/07/2018 PARKS RENTAL & SALES INC 130.34 1012938 03/07/2018 HENRY SCHEIN INC 85.80 1012939 03/07/2018 COLD AIR DISTRIBUTORS WAREHOUSE 607.96 1012940 03/07/2018 INDIAN RIVER BATTERY 108.55 1012941 03/07/2018 DEMCOINC 10,481.16 1012942 03/07/2018 DAVES SPORTING GOODS & TROP141ES 1,_728.80 1012943 03/07/2018 GALLS LLC 381.49 1012944 03/07/2018 ARCO GARAGE DOOR CO INC 106.00 012945 03/07/2018 HILL MANUFACTURING CO INC 1,191.11 1012946 03/07/2018 SOUTHERN COMPUTER WAREHOUSE 896.22 1012947 03/07/2018 WIGINTON CORPORATION 361.00 1012948 03/07/2018 COMPLETE ELECTRIC INC 3,356.16 1012949 03/07/2018 S14RJEVE CHEMICAL CO 7,229.63 1012950 03/07/2018 MIDWEST MOTOR SUPPLY CO 381.70 1012951 03/07/2018 RECHTIEN .INTERNATIONAL TRUCKS 11495 1012952 03/07/2018 POLYDYNE INC 2.576.00 1012953 03/07/2018 SOUTHERN JANITOR SUPPLY INC 11713.99 1012954 03/07/2018 METRO FIRE PROTECTION SERVICES INC 1,240.00 1012955 03/07/2018 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DISTRIBUTORS INC 231.56 1012956 03/07/2018 SIMS CRANE & EQUIPMENT CO 11294.70 1012957 03/07/2018 XYLEM WATER SOLUTION USA .INC 6,394.45 1012958 03/07/2018 ALLIED DIVERSIFIED OF VERO BEAC14 LLC 85.00 1012959 03/07/2018 FILTRATION GROUP CORPORATION 547.24 Grand Total: 82,901.74 12 ELECTRONIC PAYMENTS - WIRE & ACH TRAN'S NBR DATE 5769 03/02/2018 5770 03/02%2018 577.1 03/02/2018 P -CARD 03/02/2018 5772 03/06/2018 5773 03/06/2018 5774 03/07/2018 5775 03/07/2018 5776 03/07/2018 5777 03/07/2018 Grand Total: VENDOR AMOUNT C E R SIGNATURE CLEANING 15,4.10.00 *WIRVACH. NUMBER SKIPPED* 0.00 KIMLEY HORN & ASSOC INC 4,469.65 TD BANK, N.A. 21,718.62 FL RETIREMENT SYSTEM 567,176.15 COLONIAL LIFE & ACCIDENT INS CO 21.24 FIDELITY SECURITY LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY 2,934.68 AMERICAN FAMILY LIFE ASSURANCE CO 18,263.42 ALLSTATE 292.22 MUTUAL OF OMAHA 7,198.64 637,484.62 13 CONSENT AGENDA: 3/20/18 Of, &1 6 Of INDIAN RIVER COUNTY ATTORNEY Dylan Reingold, County Attorney WE= K DeBraal, Deputy County Attorney Kate Pingolt Cotner, Assistant County Attorney TO: The Board of County Commissioners FROM: William K. DeBraal - Deputy County Attorney DATE: March 14, 2018 SUBJECT: Release and Satisfaction of Demolition Lien (Lot 3, Block 8, Gifford School Park) On December 11, 2013, Indian River County recorded a demolition lien in the amount of $1,952.15 against Lot 3, Block 8 of Gifford School Park, which property was titled in the names of Charles T. Wadley, Sr. and Lilly Mae Wadley, his wife. The property was subsequently the subject of a foreclosure, however the demolition lien' was not scrubbed in the foreclosure; and funds have been received to satisfy the lien, including the accrued interest. Attached for the Board's consideration is a Release and Satisfaction. FUNDING: The only cost associated with this item is the recordation fee for recording the Release and Satisfaction in the amount of $10.00 which amount is available from the County Attorney's Office/Other Professional Services, Account No. 00110214-033190. It is noted that the recordation fee for the release was also included with the funds that were received to satisfy the lien. REQUESTED ACTION: Authorize the Chairman to execute the Release and Satisfaction for recordation in the Public Records of Indian River County, Florida. nhm Attachment: Release and Satisfaction 14 This document was prepared by: Office of Indian River County Attorney 1801 271h Street Vero Beach, FL 32960 772-226-1425 RELEASE AND SATISFACTION FOR AND IN CONSIDERATION of certain sums paid, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, whose address is 1801 27th Street, Vero Beach, Florida 32960, hereby releases Charles T. Wadley, Sr. and Lilly Mae Wadley, his wife, and that certain Lien for removal of a nuisance structure recorded in Book 2723, Page 639 as well as that certain Certificate of Building Official, recorded in Book 2617, Page 1212; and the following property recited in Resolution No. 2013-006, recorded in Book 2714, Page 1782, all of the Public Records of Indian River County, Florida: Lot 3, Block 8, GIFFORD SCHOOL PARK, according to the Plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book 3, at Page 53, of the Public Records of Indian River County, Florida. Parcel No. 32-39-22-00004-0080-00003.0 EXECUTED by the Chairman of the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida, this day of March, 2018. BOARD OF COUNTY OMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA ATTEST: Jeffrey R. Smith, Clerk of Court and Comptroller By: By. Deputy Clerk STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF INDIAN RIVER Peter D. O'Bryan, Chairman BCC approved: The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of March, 2018 by Peter D. O'Bryan, Chairman of the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida, who is personally known to me. NOTARY PUBLIC printed name: Commission No.: Commission Expiration: Approved as to form and legal a I . QLa William K. DeBraal Deputy County Attorney 15 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA MEMORANDUM TO: Jason E. Brown, County Administrator THROUGH: Richard B. Szpyrka, P.E., Public Works Director James W. Ennis, P.E., PMP, County Engineer FROM: William Johnson, P.E., Roadway Production Engineer SUBJECT: Work Order No. 3 — Dunkelberger Engineering & Testing, Inc. 58th Avenue Resurfacing/Reclamation From 26th Street to 49th Street Testing Services (IRC -1324) DATE: March 05, 2018 DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS On September 23, 2014, the Board of County Commissioners approved the annual agreement for Professional Geotechnical Services, with Dunkelberger Engineering and Testing, Inc. for various services including, but not limited to, field and laboratory construction materials testing in Indian River County. This agreement was amended and renewed by the Board of County Commissioners on September 20, 2016. The purpose of Work Order No. 3 is to provide laboratory testing and material engineering related services for the resurfacing/reclamation of 58th Avenue between 26th Street and 491h Street. Dunkelberger Engineering and Testing, Inc. submitted the proposal outlined in the attached Work Order No. 3 and Scope of Services (Exhibit A) for a not -to -exceed amount of $28,956.00. FUNDING Funding is budgeted in the Account Number 10921441-053360-16008 Secondary Roads/FDOT SCOP Grant/58th Avenue Resurfacing (26th St — 57th St) in the amount of $28,956.00. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of Work Order No. 3 to Dunkelberger Engineering & Testing, Inc. authorizing the professional services as outlined in the Scope of Services (Exhibit A) and requests the Board to authorize the Chairman to execute Work Order No. 3 on their behalf for a not -to -exceed amount of $28,956.00. ATTACHMENTS Work Order No. 3 Scope of Services (Exhibit A) DISTRIBUTION Dunkelberger Engineering & Testing, Inc. APPROVED AGENDA ITEM FOR March 20,201 16 MON WORK ORDER NUMBER 3 IRC -1324 58" AVENUE RESURFACING/RECLAMATION FROM 2e STREET TO 49TH STREET This Work Order Number 3 is entered into as of this day of . , 201 pursuant to that certain Annual Professional Geotechnical Engineering Services Agreement, dated September 23, 2014, and that certain Renewal and Amendment of Annual Professional Geotechnical Engineering Services Agreement entered into on the 20th day of September, 2016 collectively referred to as the "Agreement", by and between INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Florida ("COUNTY") and DUNKELSERGER ENGINEERING & TESTING, INC. ("Geotechnical Professional"). The COUNTY has selected the Geotechnical Professional to perform the professional services set forth on Exhibit A (Scope of Services), attached to this Work Order No. 3 and made part hereof by this reference. The professional services will be performed by the Consultant for the fee schedule set forth in Exhibit A (Fee Schedule), attached to this Work Order and made a part hereof by this reference. The Consultant will perform the professional services within the timeframes more particularly set forth in Exhibit A, attached to this Work Order and made a part hereof by this reference all in accordance with the terms and provisions set forth in the Agreement. Nothing contained in any Work Order shall conflict with the terms of the Agreement and the terms of the Agreement shall be deemed to be incorporated in each individual Work Order as if fully set forth herein. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Work Order as of the date first written above. CONSULTANT: Dunkelberger Engineering & Testing, lnr By: Title: By: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY Peter D. O'Bryan , Chairman iproved Date: Attest: Jeffrey R. Smith, Clerk of Court and Comptroller By: Deputy Clerk Approved: Approved as to form and legal sufficiency: Jason E. Brown, County Administrator William K. DeBraal, Deputy County Attorney 17 February 8, 2018 Revised February 27, 2018 Indian River County Engineering Division 1801 27th Street Vero Beach, Florida 32960 BUNKMERGER engineering & testing, inc. A Iy rerracon COMPANY Attention: Mr. William Johnson, P.E.... via e-mail (wjohnson@ircgov.com) Roadway Production Engineer Subject: Materials Testing Services 58th Ave Resurfacing/Reclamation from 26th to 49th IRC Project No. 1324 / FM No. 434840-1-58-01 Indian River County, Florida Terracon Proposal No. PHB181012 Dear Mr. Johnson: Dunkelberger Engineering & Testing, Inc., A Terracon Company (Terracon) is providing this proposal for Materials Testing Services for construction activities at the subject project in Indian River County, Florida. As requested, we will perform the field work on a unit rate (per test) basis. As such, a four -test minimum charge per trip to the site will apply; sample pick-up will be performed at an hourly rate. A. PROJECT INFORMATION The subject project is located on 58th Avenue from 26th Street to 49th Street. The project will involve full -depth reclamation (FDR) of the existing roadway, i.e., pulverization of the existing asphaltic concrete and base course, shoulder widening utilizing the reclaimed material, shoulder widening using traditional stabilization materials, and milling/resurfacing of select areas. The project length is approximately 11,800 lineal feet (2.25 miles). The contract duration is 270 days to substantial completion and 300 days to final completion. More specifically, the reconstruction will involve pulverization of 12 inches of existing roadway, construction of a 9 -inch thick FDR base course, and construction of three inches of asphalt pavement including a 2 -inch structural course and 1 -inch friction course. The shoulder widening will involve construction a 12 -inch thick FDR section ranging from Dunkelberger Engineering & Testing, Inc., A Terracon Co. 645 NW Enterprise Drive, Suite 107 Port St. Lucie, Florida 34986 P [772] 343 9787 F [772] 343 9404 terracon.com Proposal for Materials Testing Services Page 2 58th Avenue Resurfacing/Reclamation ❑ Indian River County, Florida February 8, 2018 ❑ Terracon Proposal No. PHB181012 2 to 7 -ft wide, as well as an unpaved 124hick stabilized shoulder on each side of the existing roadway. Also associated with the project is installation of approximately 224 lineal feet (If) of underground drainage pipe and two stormwater drainage structures. The purpose of our work is to provide quality assurance (QA) testing and inspection for the county to check the conformity of material composition with the project plans and specifications. B. SCOPE OF SERVICES Based on our understanding of the project plans and specifications, we envision that our field sampling/testing services will be required on a periodic or as needed basis over the duration of the project. More specifically, our work will involve the following., Pipe Backfill, Shoulder Stabilization, Misc. Embankment • Laboratory Proctors (AASHTO T-180) to determine maximum density of the soils used for pipe backfill. • In-place density tests of embankment for backfill placed at a frequency of 1 test per 500 If. Compacted subgrade tests are not anticipated beneath the FDR base. • In-place density tests of pipe backfill at a frequency of one test per 500 If (or fraction thereof) for each 6 -inch lift of backfill placed. • Limerock Bearing Ratio (LBR) tests of the in-place LBR materials for the Stabilized Shoulders at a frequency of 1 test every 4,000 linear feet or 3 LBR samples on each side of roadway (total of 6 tests). • In-place density tests of the LBR Shoulder Stabilization at a frequency of 1 test per 2,000 linear feet each side of roadway (total of 12 tests). FDR Base Course • FDR mix design — Review and evaluate the mix design developed by the Contractor for its design approach and procedure if requested by the County and if provided to us for review prior to construction. • Sieve Analysis test on the virgin materials before injection of emulsion at a frequency of 1 test every 1,000 linear feet per lane (estimated total of 24 tests). • Maximum Density (Proctor) tests of the in-place FDR base materials at a frequency of 1 test every 1,000 linear feet per lane (estimated total of 24 tests) • In-place density tests at a frequency of 1 test per 500 linear feet per lane for mainline and 1 test per 2,000 If for shoulder (estimated total of 112 tests). HUMMER engineering & testing, inc. Al%fracan c©MPANY 19 Proposal for Materials Testing Services Page 3 58th Avenue Resurfacing/Reclamation o Indian River County, Florida February 8, 2018 o Terracon Proposal No. PHB181012 Asphalt Plant Testina A CTQP qualified Asphalt Plant Technician will perform testing on bulk samples of the asphalt mixture for verification purposes as outlined in applicable FDOT specifications. The plant technician will also perform specific gravity testing of the Contractor's cut cores. We understand cutting of the cores will be the responsibility of the Contractor. Terracon has not been requested to provide field inspection services during placement of the asphalt in the field. However, these services can be provided upon request. While on-site our field technician will communicate with designated County and Contractor personnel so that items of concern or identified deficiencies can be immediately corrected. Proiect Management, Engineering & Reportina • Engineering oversight and review during the construction to coordinate the aforementioned test program, make site visits, and attend progress meetings. • Submittal of brief engineering reports documenting our findings and test results. Our materials testing services will be provided on an as -needed basis as dictated by the pace and methods of construction. C. COMPENSATION The material testing services provided will be billed in accordance with our current 2016-2098 Continuing Geotechnical Services Agreement as illustrated on the line item unit rates in the Estimated Scope and Budget, (Attachment A). As previously stated, a four -test minimum charge per trip to the site will apply as well as an hourly .fee for sample pickup. Terracon proposes to complete the scope of services as described herein for an estimated fee of $28,956 and invoiced on a unit rate basis. If additional services outside the listed project services are required, Terracon will provide such under auspice of a Supplemental Proposal using the same line item unit rates as provided herein. The quantity of the work performed and factors beyond our, control, such as weather and the contractor's schedule/efficiency, will affect the actual cost for our services. You will be invoiced at regular intervals but not less than monthly for services performed. Invoices for our services will be directed to the addressee of this letter unless we are directed otherwise. Payment is due within thirty (30) days following receipt of an invoice. DUNKELBERRER engineering & testing, inc. Alferfacon COMPANY 20 Proposal for Materials Testing Services Page 4 58'" Avenue Resurfacing/Reclamation a Indian River County, Florida February 8, 2018 o Terracon Proposal No. PHB181012 D. SITE ACCESS AND SAFETY Indian River County (IRC) shall secure all necessary site related approvals, permits, licenses, and consents necessary to commence and complete the services and will execute any necessary site access agreement. At Terracon, we all have a personal and uncompromising commitment to everyone going home safely each and every day. Our safety program, Incident and Injury Free® is about care and concern for people. It is our personal and organizational commitment at all levels of the company and is where safety is held as a core value as well as an operational priority. Working safely is an inseparable part of working correctly, just as much as other operational priorities, in particular quality, profitability and schedule. IIF is our commitment to our people and others, who we value for who they are and what they do. IIF is not just something we do, it's in everything we do. As part of our IIF process, we will prepare a "Pre -Task Plan" to identify the potential site safety and job hazards associated with your site. Our Pre -Task Plan will identify and prepare our personnel to be able to handle conditions such as but not limited to traffic control, environmental contamination, site access issues, overhead and underground utilities, adverse weather conditions, and personal protection equipment and will continually be reviewed and reevaluated throughout the field work activities. We understand that each site is unique and may contain different safety conditions and as a company to protect our personnel as well as others, we look at each site individually to identify the potential concerns. E. TESTING AND SAMPLING The above services will be provided under an as -requested basis. Additionally, we request a 48-hour notice to schedule our services. IRC understands that testing and sampling are discrete procedures, and that such procedures indicate conditions only at the depths, locations, and times the procedures were performed. Terracon will provide test results and opinions based only on the field/laboratory tests in the areas tested. IRC understands that testing and sampling are not continuous or exhaustive, and are conducted to reduce — not eliminate — project risk. IRC agrees to the level or amount of testing performed and the associated risk. IRC is responsible (even if delegated to contractor) for notifying and scheduling Terracon so Terracon can perform these services. Terracon shall not be responsible for the quality and completeness of IRC or its contractors work or their adherence to the BUNKEhBERGER engineering & testing, inc. Alrerracan COMPANY 21 Proposal for Materials Testing Services Page 5 58th Avenue Resurfacing/Reclamation a Indian River County, Florida February 8, 2018 ® Terracon Proposal No. PHB181012 project documents, and Terracon's performance of testing and sampling services shall not relieve contractor in any way from its responsibility for defects discovered in its work, or create a warranty or guarantee. Terracon will not supervise or direct the work performed by IRC or its contractors and is not responsible for their means and methods. F. AUTHORIZATION Terracon appreciates the opportunity to submit this proposal and looks forward to rendering the services described herein. Should you accept this proposal, we understand that this work will be performed under a Purchase Order issued by Indian River County. Should you have any questions concerning this proposal, please feel free to contact Kimberly Roberts or Dave Youngstrom by e-mail (kimberly.robertsO-terracon.com or dave.youngstrom(&-terracon.com), or by phone at 772-343-9787. Sincerely, Dunkelberger Engineering & Testing, Inc., A Terracon Company Kimberly RoVer David T. Yoinager st m Project ManPSL Office ,, nom- /FOR Michael J. 'mon or, P.E. WPI3 Office anager Attachments: A - Estimated Scope and Budget BUNKMERGER engineering & testing, inc. slrerracon COMPANY 22 ATTACHMENT A 58th Avenue Res urfacinglReclamation From 26th St to 49th St Indian River County, Florida ESTIMATED SCOPE 8, BUDGET Field Observations 8 Testing vescription Total Units T e I Rate I Extended Cost In -Place Density Testing, FDR (I test/500each ane '4 test minimum per visit 100 Test . $24.00 = $2,40000 2 In -Place Density Testing, FDR Shoulder (1 test/2,000 ft) "4 test minimum per visit 12 Test . $24.00 - $288.00 3 In -Place Density Testing, Stab. Should (1 test/2,000 ft) '4 test minimum per visit 1 12 1 Test . $24.00 = $288.00 4 In -Place Density Testing, Pipe Backfill (1 test/6-in lift per section placed) '4 test minimum per visit 45 Test . $25.00 = $1 125.00 s Sr. Eng. Technician, Sampling (18 trips @ 4 hrs/trip) 72 Hours .L $60.00 = $4,320.00 Sub -Total $8,421.00 Laboratory Testing Description Total Units Type Rate Extended Cost Proctor Test, FDR (T-180)' 1/1,000 ft of each lane 24 Each $90.00 = $2,160.00 2 Proctor Test, Embankment/Pipe Backfill (T-99) (1/SoilType) 2 Each . $90.00 - $180.00 3 Urnerock Bearing Ratio Test (FM 5-515) 1/4,000 ft of Shoulder 6 Each . $300.00 = $1,8 0.00 Material Finer than the No. 200 Sieve 30 Each . $40.00 = $1,200.00 a Sieve Analysis -27 30 Each . $70.00 = $2,100.00 `The Proctor test for the FDR involves laboratory density determination of the field -prepared FDR mixture with emulsions Sub -Total $7,440.00 Asphalt Observations & esttng Description Total Units I Type Rate Extended Cost , FDOT CTQP Certified Plant Inspector 12 days) 120 Hour x $60.00 = $7,200.00 2 Trip Charge to Asphalt Plant from Office 12 Tri . $35.00 3 4 Sub -Total $7,620.00 Engineering & Reporting Services escron Total Units Type Rate Extended Cost Principal Engineer 15 Hour . $175.00 = $2,625.00 2 Project Mana er/En ineer 30 Hour . $95.00 3 Clerical/Adminstration 0 Hour x $50.00 = $0.00 4 Sub -Total $5,475.00 Field Observations & Material Testing bervices Subtotal of Materials Testing Services Total $28,956.00 2 . - $0.00 Total $0.00 I Total 645 NW Enterprise Drive, Suite 107 - Port St. Lucie, Florida 34986 - p 772.343.9897 - f 772.343.9404 23 Consent 3-D INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA MEMORANDUM TO: Honorable Board of County Commissioners THROUGH: Jason E. Brown, County Administrator THROUGH: John King, Director Department of Emergency Services FROM: Cory Richter, Battalion Chief Department of Emergency Services Fire Rescue DATE: March 9, 2018 SUBJECT: Approval of Renewal for a Class "E" and Class `B" Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity for Falck Southeast II, Corp d/b/a All County Ambulance to Provide Wheelchair/Stretcher and Interfacility Ambulance Transportation Services. It is respectfully requested that the information contained herein be given formal consideration by the Board of County Commissioners at the next scheduled meeting. DESCRIPTION On March 1, 2016, the Indian River County Board of County Commissioners approved a renewal for a Class `B" and Class `B" Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity for Falck Southeast Il, Corp d/b/a All County Ambulance to provide wheelchair/stretcher and interfacility ambulance medical transportation originating within Indian River County. This certificate was necessary in order to comply with Indian River Code of Laws and Ordinances as specified in Chapter 304. The certificate was approved for a period of two (2) years and their current certificate will expire on March 27, 2018. The Indian River County Code provides for routine renewal of the EMS Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity on an application by the certificate holder. This can be accomplished without a public hearing if the Board has no reason to believe that the public health, safety, and welfare require it. Staff submits that there is no reason to hold a public hearing and absent that requirement, the Board is requested to renew the certificate. An application for the renewal of the Class `B" and Class `B" Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity has been submitted by Falck Southeast 11, Corp d/b/a All County Ambulance. Staff has reviewed the application and no reasons are known or perceived that would require a public hearing pursuant to the established ordinance. 24 FUNDING: There are no funding requirements for this item. RECOMMENDATION: Staff respectfully recommends that the Board of County Commissioners approve renewal of the Class "E" and Class `B" Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity for Falck Southeast II, Corp d/b/a All County Ambulance, to be effective for a period of two (2) years from March 27, 2018 to March 27, 2020. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Renewal Application from Falck Southeast II, Corp d/b/a All County Ambulance 2. Two (2) Certificates of Public Convenience and Necessity for Falck Southeast II, Corp d/b/a All County Ambulance for signature 25 PS�ENT INDIAN RIVER COUNTY ltiQPs•�F O v " DEPARTMENT OF EMERGENCY SERVICES FNCY 9 APPLICATION FOR CERTIFICATE OF PUBLIC CONVENIENCE AND NECESSITY (COPCN) ANT';NAME: j Falck Southeast 11 Corp d/b/a All County Ambulance March 8, 2018 APPLICATION FEE: $100.00 APPLIES TO INITIAL APPLICATIONS ONLY. If payment applicable, make check payable to INDIAN RIVER COUNTY FIRE RESCUE. ❑ This is a new application; fee is attached. ® This is a renewal of our present COPCN. ❑ This is a renewal of our present COCPN with ownership or classification changes. CLASSIFICATION OF CERTIFICATE REQUESTED Please check applicable boxes and options. Class A ❑ _BLS _ALS Governmental entities that use advanced life support vehicles to conduct a pre- hospital EMS ALS/BLS service. Class B ® X BLS X'ALS Agencies that provide non -emergency ambulance inter -facility medical transport at the ALS/BLS level. Class C ❑ _BLS _ALS Agencies that provide non -emergency ambulance inter -facility medical transports. which require special clinical capabilities and require a physician's order. Class D ❑ _BLS _ALS Agencies that provide non -emergency ambulance medical transports limited to out of county transfers. Class E ® X Wheelchair X Wheelchair/Stretcher Ambulatory Transport Agencies that provide wheelchair transportation service only where said services are paid for in part or in whole either directly or indirectly with government funds. Class E1 ❑ Wheelchair Wheelchair/Stretcher Ambulatory Transport Agencies -that provide wheelchair vehicle service where said services are not paid for in part or in whole either directly or indirectly with' government funds. C:\Users\jsalvesen\Desktop\Indian River COPCN 2018W I County Ambulance COPCN 2018.doc 26 H. COMPANY DETAILS 1. NAME OF AMBULANCE SERVICE: All County Ambulance MAILING ADDRESS: 4227 Saint Lucie Blvd CITY Ft. Pierce, COUNTY St. Lucie, Fl ZIP CODE: 34946 BUSINESS PHONE: 772-465-1111 2. TYPE OF OWNERSHIP(i.e. Private, Government, Volunteer, Partnership, etc.): 3. MANAGER'S NAME: Michael DeSouza ADDRESS: 4227 St. Lucie Blvd, Ft Pierce, FI 34946 PHONE #: 772-465-1111 4. PROVIDE NAME OF OWNER(s) OR LIST ALL OFFICERS, PARTNERS, DIRECTORS, AND SHAREHOLDERS, IF A CORPORATION (attach a separate sheet if necessary): NAME ADDRESS POSITION Charles Maymon 6605 NW 74'h Ave Miami, FI 33166 President/ VP/ Treasure Brian Richmond 6605 NW 74th Ave Miami, FI 33166 Secretary 5. PROVIDE NAMES AND ADDRESSES OF AT LEAST THREE (3) LOCAL REFERENCES NAME ADDRESS PHONE # John Skalko 100037 th Street Vero Beach, 32960 772-567-2552 Will Talbert 131037 th Street Vero Beach, 32960 772-569-5107 Darleen Silverstein 100037 th Street Vero Beach, 32960 772-567-4311 2 C:\Users\jsalvesen\Desktop\Indian River COPCN 2018\AII County Ambulance COPCN 2018.doc 2 6. FUNDING SOURCE: Private 7. RATE SCHEDULE ATTACHED? YES ❑ NO ❑ N/A ❑ 8. LIST THE ADDRESS(es) OF YOUR BASE AND ALL SUB -STATIONS: Main Office 4227 St. Lucie Blvd Ft. Pierce, FI 34946 Indian River Medical Center 1000 37th Street Vero Beach, FI 32960 III. COMMUNICATIONS INFORMATION: TYPES OF RADIOS/EQUIPMENT: See Attached 1. RADIO FREQUENCY (ies) 2. RADIO CALL NUMBER(s) See Attached 4. LIST ALL HOSPITALS AND OTHER EMERGENCY AGENCIES WITH WHICH YOU HAVE DIRECT RADIO COMMUNICATIONS: FROM AMBULANCE FROM BASE STATION Statewide Med 8 Statewide Med 8 Holmes Regional Medical Center Lawnwood Regional Medical Center C:\Users\jsalvesen\Desktop\Indian River COPCN 2018\AII County Ambulance COPCN 2018.doc 28 IV. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUIRED TO BE SUBMITTED WITH THIS APPLICATION: 1. Factual Statement indicating the public need and services, including studies supporting the demonstrated demand and feasibility for the proposed service(s) and deficiencies in existing services, and any other pertinent data you wish to be considered. 2. Factual statement of the proposed services to be provided, including type of service, hours and days of operation, market to be served, geographic areas to be serviced, and any other pertinent data you wish to be considered. 3. Factual Statement indicating the ability of the applicant to manage and provide the proposed services, including the management plan, maintenance facilities, insurance program, accounting system, system for handling complaints, system for handling accidents and injuries, system for providing the county monthly operating reports and any other pertinent data you wish to be considered. 4. Copy of Standard Operating Procedures. On File IRFD 5. Copy of Medical Protocols. On File IRFD 6. Copy of your insurance policy — must show coverage limits — On File IRFD 7. Vehicle Information. For each vehicle provide the following: See Attached a. Make, Model, Year, Manufacturer b. Mileage c. VIN # d. Tag Number e. Passenger capacity (E/E1 classification) f. Indicate ALS/BLS (A -D classification) 8. Personnel Roster. For each employee provide the following: See Attached a. Name — Last, First and Middle Initial b. Driver's License # (if commercial, specify class) & Expiration Date ADDITIONAL INFO REQUIRED FOR A -D classifications c. Emergency Medical Service Certification and # (EMT or Paramedic) d. Expiration date of Certification e. Whether or not has an Emergency Vehicle Operation Certificate. 9. Fee Schedule Including: See Attached Service Type, Base Rate, Mileage, Waiting and Special Charges C:\Users\jsalvesen\Desktop\Indian River COPCN 2018\All County Ambulance COPCN 2018.doc 29 V. NOTARIZED STATEMENTS Fill in Statements as applicable. E or E1 AP,PLICANTS I, Michael DeSouza, the representative of Applicant Name All County Ambulance do hereby attest that the Business Name of Service above named service meets all the requirements of, and that I agree to comply with, all applicable provisions of Chapter 304, Life Support and Wheelchair Services. A -D APPLICANTS 1, Michael DeSouza , the representative of Applicant Name All County Ambulance , do hereby attest that Business Name of Service the above named service will provide continuous service on a 24-hour, 7 -day week basis. I do hereby attest that the above named service meets all the requirements for operation of an ambulance service in the State of Florida as provided in Chapter 401, Part III, Florida Statutes, Chapter 64E-2, Florida Administrative Code, and that I agree to comply with all the provisions of Chapter 304, Life Support Services. ALL APPLICANTS I further acknowledge that discrepancies discovered during the effective period of the Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity will subject this service and its authorized representatives to corrective action and penalty provided in the referenced authority and that to the best of my knowledge, all statements on this application are true and correct. " As� --^% - 310 ►8 APPLICANT S1. TURE DATE Before me personally appeared the said M 'i CY) a(-1 DC-!; b hZ-tom who says that he/she executed the above instrument of his/her own free will and accord, with full knowledge of the pu ose th =Sd subscribed in my presence this 8 day ofMarch, 2018. i, My commission expires: I 1 c j NOTARY PUBLIC OS�y Felecla Olmstead o NOTARY PUBLIC 0 STATE OF FLORIDA C:\Users\jsalvesen\Desktop\Irtg Expi' i�� 972��i'ty Ambulance COPCN 2018.doc 30 31 Vehicle Information 2017 Treasure Coast 08 -Mar -18 4227 St. Lucie Blvd., Ft. Pierce FL 34946 32 Ambulance Unit Service Year Make Model Type Vin # Vehicle Ta 219 ALS 2009 Chevy 3500 II 1 GBHG396791182489 MIJ28P 221 ALS 2013 Ford E-350 III 1 FDWE3FS6DDA22679 MIK28H 222 BLS 2008 Ford E-350 11 1 FDSS34P98DB47736 MIK62H 223 BLS 2009 Ford E-350 II 1 FDSS34P59DA22735 MIK65H 224 ALS 2014 Ford E-350 II 1FDSS3EL6EDA82707 MIK71H 225 ALS 2014 Ford E-350 II 1 FDSS3EL7EDB1 5147 MIL62R 226 BLS 2014 Ford E-350 11 1 FDSS3EL1 EDB15144 MIL61 R 227 ALS 2016 Ford E-350 III 1 FDWE3FS9GDC14196 MIM67A 228 ALS 2014 Ford E350 II 1FDSS3EL9EDB07292 MIM81A 229 ALS 2011 Ford E350 II 1 FDSS3EL3BDB23810 MFY30B 230 BLS 2013 Ford E350 II 1 FDSS3ELADDA78427 MFY29B 231 BLS 2013 Ford E350 II 1 FDSS3EL4DDA75205 MFY27B 232 ALS 2011 Ford E350 1 1 FDSS3EL6BDB25874 MFZ55C 233 234 ALS ALS 2015 2011 Ford Ford E350 E350 111 111 1 FDWE3FS6FDA16139 1 FDWE3FS6BDB20382 MFY 28B MIK 981 N -Med Unit Service Year Make Model Type Vin # Vehicle Tag 609 MTS 2003 Ford E-250 W/C 1FTNE24243HA86367 BIQJ57 612 ACA 2013 Ford E-150 NMS 1FTNSIEWODDA22694 BVAQ33 614 ACA 2008 Ford E-150 W/C 1 FTNE14W88DA92216 CUTN07 615 ACA 2013 FORD E-150 Combo 1 FTNS2EWXDDB26549 CFTU08 32 33 Page 1 of 1 ACORE® CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE D09/26/20ATE 01177� THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AFFIRMATIVELY OR NEGATIVELY AMEND, EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW. THIS CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A CONTRACT BETWEEN THE ISSUING INSURER(S), AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE OR PRODUCER, AND THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. IMPORTANT: If the certificate holder is an ADDITIONAL INSURED, the policy(les) must have ADDITIONAL INSURED provisions or be endorsed. If SUBROGATION IS WAIVED, subject to the terms and conditions of the policy, certain policies may require an endorsement. A statement on this certificate does not confer rights to the certificate holder in lieu of such endorsement(s). PRODUCER Willis of Seattle, Inc. CONTACT NAME: PHONE _ 1-877-945-7378 FAX 1-888-467-2378 (AIC.No): c/o 26 Century Blvd P.O. Box 305191 E-MAIL certificates@willis.com ADDRESS: INSURERS AFFORDING COVERAGE NAIC N Nashville, TN 372305191 USA INSURERA: Coverys Specialty Insurance Company 15686 DAMAGE TO R T PREMISES Ea occurrence $ 1,000,000 INSURED INSURER B: Steadfast Insurance Company 26387 Falck Southeast Ii, Corp. d/b/a All County Ambulance GEN'L AGGREGATE LIMIT APPLIES PER: POLICY 0 PROJECT F__]LOC OTHER: 4227 St. Lucie Blvd INSURER C: INSURER D: Fort Pierce, FL 34946 USA INSURER E; INSURER F: COVERAGES CERTIFICATE NUMBER: W3657692 REVISION NUMBER: THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED. NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT, TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS, EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES. LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS. ILT R LTR TYPE OF INSURANCE ADD SUER POLICYNUMBER MMffDCY EFF MM/DDfYYYY LIMITS A X COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY CLAIMS -MADE FKOCCUR X Products -Claims Made 5-10013 10/01/2017 10/01/2018 EACH OCCURRENCE $ 1,000,000 DAMAGE TO R T PREMISES Ea occurrence $ 1,000,000 MED EXP (Any one person) $ 5,000 PERSONAL BADV INJURY $ 1,000,000 GEN'L AGGREGATE LIMIT APPLIES PER: POLICY 0 PROJECT F__]LOC OTHER: GENERAL AGGREGATE $ 2,000,000 PRODUCTS - COMP/OP AGG $ 2,000,000 $ AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY ANY AUTO OWNED SCHEDULED AUTOS ONLY AUTOS HIRED NON -OWNED AUTOS ONLY AUTOS ONLY COMBINED SINGLE LIMIT $ Ea accident BODILY INJURY (Per person) $ BODILY INJURY (Per accident) $ PROPERTY DAMAGE $ Per accident B X UMBRELLA LIAB EXCESS LIAB X OCCUR CLAIMS -MADE UtdH5414770-04 10/01/2017 10/01/2018 EACH OCCURRENCE $ 15, 000, 000 AGGREGATE $ 15,000,000 DED I I RETENTION $ $ WORKERS COMPENSATION AND EMPLOYERS' LIABILITY Y / N ANYPROPRIETOR/PARTNER/EXECUTIVE ❑ OFFICER/MEMBEREXCLUDED? (Mandatory In NH) If yes, describe under DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS below N/A OTH- STATUTEI ER E.L. EACH ACCIDENT $ E.L. DISEASE - EA EMPLOYEE $ E.L. DISEASE -POLICY LIMIT $ DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS/LOCATIONS/VEHICLES(ACORD 101, Additional Remarks Schedule, maybe attached if more space is required) Indian River County Fire Department 4225 43rd Avenue Vero Beach, FL 32967 ACORD 25 (2016/03) UANUtLLA I IUN SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE THE EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF, NOTICE WILL BE DELIVERED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE POLICY PROVISIONS. AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE ©1988-2015 ACORD CORPORATION. A r ghts reserved. The ACORD name and logo are registered marks of ACORD sx iD: 15113770 BATCH: 456610 35 1 t a la iy � xx l•' rt an r ' , A�-24 spatGh 'i '9 ! �U' W Radio Communication Kenwood Radio system Model # Nx BOOK UHF Digital Transceiver Base Station Location: St. Lucie County 4227 St. Lucie Blvd Fort Pierce, F134946 36 REFERENCE COPY This is not an official FCC license, It is a record of public information contained in the FCC's licensing database on the date that this reference copy was generated, In cases–where FCC rules require the presentation, posting, or display of an FCC license, this document may not be used in place of an official of. %W-=Rp Xf, 01 01!,Wederal Communications Commission Wireless Telecommunications Bureau RADIO STATION AUTHORIZATION ATTN. DAVID A TERVM— HIGHLAND WIRELESS S 6894 NW 20TH AVE FORT LAUDERDALE, FL FCC Registration Number (FRN): 000541 Fixed Location Address or Mobile Area of Operation Loc, I Address: 12008 SW MARTIN HWY (#5050) IVA City; PALM CITY County: MARTIN e LatONAD83).27-07-176N Long (NAD83).09 Loc. 2 Area of operation Operating within a 32.0 km radius around fixed location I Call Sign File Number WQNM866 I - Radio Service IG - Industrial/Business Pool, Con*ventional 'Regulatory Status PMRS Frequency Coordination Number SPECIFICATIONS Loc Ant Frequencies Sta. No. No. Emission Outp Ant. Ant. Construct No. No. (MHz) Cis. Units Pagers Designator P HtJTp AAT Deadline meters meters Date 1 1 0004,52,22500000 FB6 1 1 IK2F1D .000 250. 140,2 142.5 09-18-2011 11 K2F2D I IK2F3E 4KOOF7W 1 1 000453.00000000 FB6 I I IK2P1D 100.000 P1.000 '12 142.5 09-18-2011 3 1 K2F2D I IK2F3E 4KOOF7W Conditions: Pursuant to §309(h) of the Communications -Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §309(h), this licensee- is sub' the a or following conditions: This license shall not vest in the licensee any right to operate the station nor a the frequencies designated in the license beyond the term thereof nor in any other manner than authori either the license; not the right granted thereunder shall be assigned or otherwise transferred in violation of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, See 47 U.S.C, § 310(d). This license is subject in terms to the right of use or control conferred by §706 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended. See 47 U.S.C. §606. FCC 601 -LM Page 1 of 4 August 2W Licensee Name-, HIGHLAND WIRELESS SERVICES, LLC Call Sign: WQM' File Number: Print Date; Antennas Loc Ant Frequen Sta. No. No. Emission Output ERP Ant. Ant. Construct No. Ido. (MHz) Cis. Units Pagers Designator Power (watts) Ht./Tp AAT Deadline 1 1 0004,61.375 Q FB6 I 11K2F1D (watts) 100.000 250.000 meters 1402 meters 142.5 Date 09-18-2011 I I K2F2D I I K2173E 4KOOF7W 1 1 000461,80000000 FB6 i 11K2F1D I I K2F2D 100.000 250.000 1402 142.5 09-18-2011 I I K*2F3E 4KOOF7W 1 1 000463.20000000 2 IMPID 100,000 250,000 140.2 142.5 09-18-2011 I I K2F2D 11KME 4KOOF7W 1 1 000462,42500000 11K2FID 100.000 250.000 140.2 142.5 04-05-2012 I IK2F2D I I K2F3E 4KOOF7W 1 1 000464.05000000 FB6 11K2FID IMM 100.000 250.000 140.2 142.5 0405-2012 2 1 000452.22500000 M06 go 2 1 00045722500000 2 1 000453.00000000 2 1 000458-00000000 M06 90 M06 90 M06 go Page 2 of 4 - -2011 -2011 3-201 1 8-2011 FCC 601 -LM August W 7-7777=77=777:�= Licensee Name: HIGHLAND WIRELESS SERVICES, LLC Call Sign: WQML File Number: Print Date: Antenna4s Loc Ant Frequen Sta. 'No. No. Emission Output ERF Ant. Ant Construct No, No. (NMz) Cls. Units Pagers Designator Power (watts) HtjTp AAT Deadline Date 000461.3/5 M06 2 J 000 M06 g0, IMPID I I KMD 11 K2F3E meters meters 50.000 50.000 09.19-2011 4KOOF7W 2 1 000466.37500000 .2 M06 go I lK2F1D 50.000 50.000 09-18-2011 2 1 000463.20000000 90 1lK2F1D 50.000 50,000 09.18-2011 I IK2F21) I IK2F3E MOM 2 1 000468.20000000 196- 1 IK2PID 50.000 50.000 09-18-2011 11 K2F2D I I K2F3B 4KOOF7W 2 1 000461.90000000 M06o A, I IK2FID 50.000 50,000 09-18-2011 2 1 2 1 2 1 -2011 -2012 i-2012 5-2012 FCC 601 -LM Page 3 of 4 August 280 Licensee Name: HIGHLAND WIRELESS SERVICES, LLC FCC 601 -LM Page 4 of 4 August 20040 \ ��)!W M 1 41 Employee Certification Status * [,7 (? Employee, Credential Reports> Employee Certification Status Query Type Certification Credential Type Show All V EMi V -AII- V Home Cost Center Status Output Format -All - Active V ®m 0M 09 Query All EMT Certifications On Record .Employee Emp. ID Cost Center Certification View Number Effective Expires Days To Exp, Notes Alvarez, Jason AJS533 86 EMT 530016 N/A 12/1/2018 268 Apollon, Sebastien 793 85 EMT 556569 N/A 12/1/2018 268 Baldwin, Christopher 697 85 EMT 5511055 N/A 12/1/2018 268 Berube, Vanessa 739 85 EMT 551818 N/A 12/1/2018 268 i Brown, JefferyL 810534 85 EMT 1:l 74531 N/A 12/1/2018 268 j Bruscia, Benjamin 822 85 EMT 558205 N/A 12/1/2018 268 �Surgos,Javier 769 85 EMT 554280 N/A 12/1/2038 268 €{•Camiel, CoryH 754 85 EMT 554069 N/A 12/1/2018 268 ( Caprio, Nicholas A T77 85 EMT 554201 N/A 12/1/2018 268 Cardona, Paul A 505603 85 EMT t?" 550638 N/A 12/1/2018 268 �Cianne, Junior 658 BS EMT 548570 N/A 12/1/2018 268 Corso, John 794 85 EMT 555494 N/A 12/1/2018 268 Couch, Donald A 774 a5 EMT 555035 N/A 12/1/2018 268 1 DeFriest, Michael J 613 85 EMT %h 545730 N/A 12/1/2018 268 Dorado Mendez, Edundo 807 a5 EMT 552938 N/A 12/1/2018 268 Doyle, Christopher W 000381 86 EMT 527099 N/A 12/1/2018 268 tl t Fand, Megan R 775 86 EMT 552955 N/A 12/1/2018 268 Fairweather, ferrel 710 -85 EMT +fib 551507 N/A 12/1/2018 268 i French, Jeremy FJ3431 85 EMT EMT 535619 N/A 12/1/2018 268 Fuller, April FA4285 85 EMT 529178 N/A 12/1/2018 268 'Fusco, Anthony i 796 85 EMT 556832 N/A 12/1/2018 268 Gardner, RobertS 719 85 EMT r 549017 N/A 12/1/2018 268 j Giaccio, Mike, FTO 708 a5 EMT z;; 551510 N/A 12/1/2018 268 Glennon, Matthew 785 85 EMT 555499 N/A 12131/2018 298 Glenton, Kyle 797 a5 EMT 555559 N/A 12/1/2018 268 �Gobler, Brooks 695 85 EMT 548232 N/A 12)3/2018 268 Gonzalez 111, Manace, FTO GM1882 83 EMT 531605 N/A 12/1/2018 268 p Tanner, FTO W 764 85 EMT 553941 N/A 12/1/2018 268 tt{Gower, 3 Gutierrez, George 786 85 EMT 555736 N/A 12/31/2018 298 =Haggerty, Patrick HP9778 86 EMT 532805 N/A 12/1/2018 268 Hamel, Curtis 787 g5 EMT 554497 N/A 12/33/2036 298 Hodge, Austin 703 85 EMT 551168 N/A 12/1/2038 268 Horton, Mariana 655 86 EMT 546510 N/A 12/1/2018 268 (Johnson, Michelle A 601 86 EMT 542652 N/A 12/1/2038 268 King, Adam 751 85 EMT 550200 N/A 12/1/2018 258 Ledingham, Sean 661 85 EMT 549031 N/A 12/1/2018 268 Loewe, SheriL 805 86 EMT 308893 N/A 12/3/2018 268 {; l Machesko, Joseph 674 85 EMT 545402 N/A 12/1/2018 268 j Mangola, Jacob, FTO MF5761 85 EMT EMT 526697 N/A 12/1/2018 268 Martian, Elijah R SSSf 826 168 EMT 559678 N/A 12/1/2038 268 Maurer, lake 824 85 EMT iy 556993 N/A 12/1/2018 268 McDermott, Thomas R 827 85 EMT 559317 N/A 12/1/2018 268 Menardy, Franchesca 799 86 EMT 511263 N/A 12/1/2018 268 Michel, Smithlin 816 85 EMT 556918 N/A 12/1/2018 268 Miller, Katherine A 627 85 EMT 545955 N/A 12/1/2018 268 Moynihan, Lindsey ML4075 85 EMT int 522706 N/A 12/1/2018 268 Murray -Johnson, Kathlene m 810 85 EMT 557346 N/A 12/1/2018 268 lNeislus, Sarah, FTO N57920 86 EMT 515346 N/A 12/1/2038 268 jNoclta,Kimberly A 621 85 EMT 544691 N/A 12/1/2018 268 (Ortiz, Jacob 673 85 EMT s., 549050 N/A 12/1/2018 268 Parrish, Kristopher, FTO PK4310 86 EMT EMT516773N/A 12/1/2018 268 r Phillips, Vincent PV8512 85 EMT EMT532907 N/A 12/1/2018 268 Veril iPieler, John 821 85 EMT 553007 N/A 12/1/2018 268 f Pilcto, Christopher J 6077 BS EMT 524645 N/A 12/1/2018 268 Poches, Alexander 800 85 EMT 552884 N/A 12/1/2018 268 Ramirez, Alejandro 828 168 EMT 558275 N/A 12/1/2018 268 Reuther, Matthew RMS500 86 EMT EMT 527844 N/A 12/1/2018 268 Page 1 of 2 42 Back httns://www.eDro-Dlus.com/EPS/EmDlovee/CertificationRi)t.asi) 3/8/2018 Employee Certification Status Ruff, Cody 802 85 EMT 556742 N/A 12/1/2018 268 J Selpel, Ashley 815 85 EMT 557538 N/A 12/1/2018 268 i5eiph,Tanner 554 86 EMT 541491 8/30/2014 12/1/2018 268 Sewell, Karen 664 66 EMT 549407 N/A 12/1/2018 268 Sparkman, Cody M 718 86 EMT 552101 N/A 12/1/2018 268 Spinetta, Michael V 830 168 EMT 557684 N/A 12/1/2018 268 Thomas, Kristen 714 86 EMT 551515 N/A 12/1/2018 268 Torres Ramirez, Alberto 788 85 EMT 555413 N/A 12/31/2018 298 i Tse,Tai-TJingQ 763 g5 EMT 553294 N/A 12/1/2018 268 Whalen-Henik, Matthew 735 85 EMT 551497 N/A 12/1/2018 268 Williams, Corey 804— 85 EMT 555567 N/A 12/1/2018 268 Young, Kevin 831 168 EMT 547342 N/A 12/1/2018 268 Page 2 of 2 43 httns://www.enro-nlus.com/EPS/Emnlovee/CertificationRDt.ast) 3/8/2018 Employee Certification Status 24 r�,' P Employee> Credential Reports> Employee Certification Status Query Type Certification Credential Type Show All V PARAMEDIC V -AII- V Home Cost Center Status Output Format -All - V1 o t 0M O@ Query I All PARAMEDIC Certifications On Record Employee Emp. ID Cost Center Certification View Number Effective Expires Days To Exp. Notes Ahmad -Khan, Robert, FTO AR6016 86 PARAMEDIC G, 206085 N/A 12/1/2018 268 Almanza, Linda AL4693 96 PARAMEDIC K' 522577 N/A 12/1/2018 268 Alvarez, Jason AISS33 86 PARAMEDIC t� 522882 N/A 12/1/2018 268 Bacelo, Michael, FTO BM9003 86 PARAMEDIC 1:w 508284 N/A 12/1/2018 268 Baldwin, Christopher 697 8.5 PARAMEDIC 532777 N/A 12/1/2018 268 Bernier, Edgar 678 86 PARAMEDIC t~3 513546 N/A 12/1/2018 268 Bottoms, Erik 0 BE0702 86 PARAMEDIC 510676 N/A 12/1/2018 268 {; Carreiro, Thomas M 760 86 PARAMEDIC 529939 N/A 12/1/2018 268 f{ Crespi, Alexander J 596 86 PARAMEDIC >a{ 527801 N/A 12/1/2018 268 ttj Dennis, John DJ0934 83 PARAMEDIC N/A 12/1/2018 268 DeSouza, Michael DM5669 83 PARAMEDIC PMD 6657 N/A 12/1/2018 268 . Doyle, Christopher W DC0381 86 PARAMEDIC r* 526351 N/A 12/7/2018 268 i Fand, Megan R 775 86 PARAMEDIC 532282 N/A 12/1/2018 268 i Giaccio, Mike, FTO 708 85 PARAMEDIC 532761 N/A 12/1/2018 268 i Grivas, Kristina 607 86 PARAMEDIC 526296 N/A 12/1/2018 268 Haggerty, Patrick HP9778 86 PARAMEDIC PMD 522611 N/A 12/1/2018 268 i I Henderson, Mario HM4165 86 PARAMEDIC PMD 517353 N/A 12/1/2018 268 Hodge, Austin 703 85 PARAMEDIC N/A 6/1/2019 450 j Hord, Denise W HD2395 86 PARAMEDIC PMD 206294 N/A 12/1/2018 268 IHorton, Mariana 655 86 PARAMEDIC 531771 N/A 12/1/2018 268 Humann, Sean M 825 168 PARAMEDIC 529827 N/A 12/1/2018 268 jHunter, Christopher FTO HC9076 86 PARAMEDIC PMD522426 N/A 12/1/2018 268 Johnson, Michelle A 601 86 PARAMEDIC 531396 3/29/201712/1/2018 268 Keller, Andrea PA7899 86 PARAMEDIC PMD513562 N/A 12/1/2018 268 j Loewe, SheriL 805 86 PARAMEDIC 514256 N/A 12/1/2018 268 j Mace, John W3217 86 PARAMEDIC PMD514298 N/A 12/1/2018 268 Masters, Daniel MD7546 86 PARAMEDIC PMD524373 N/A 12/1/2018 268 + Mcglothlin, Lance ML6262 86 PARAMEDIC 529609 N/A 12/1/2018 268 Menardy, Franchesca 799 86 PARAMEDIC 527180 N/A 72/1/2018 268 Morrison. lames M 642 86 PARAMEDIC 520995 N/A 12/1/2018 268 1 Neislus, Sarah, FTO NS7920 86 PARAMEDIC PMD 514538 N/A 12/1/2018 268 { Parrish, Kristopher, FTO PK4310 86 PARAMEDIC 't',e 527078 N/A 12/1/2018 268 Payne, Matthew 553 86 PARAMEDIC PMD526894 N/A 12/1/2018 268 s Phillips, Lorne PL2870 86 PARAMEDIC PM0526896 N/A 72/1/2018 268 ( Reid, Sheila, FfO 854894 86 - PARAMEDIC PMD 206971 N/A 12/1/2018 268 Reinhard, Rochelle 648 86 PARAMEDIC 11954 N/A 12/1/2018 268 I Reuther, Matthew RM6500 86 PARAMEDIC PMO 520348 N/A 12/1/2018 268 i i Selph,Tanner 554 85 PARAMEDIC PMDS29069 N/A 12/1/2018 268 Sewell, Karen 664 86 PARAMEDIC PMO531926 N/A 12/1/2018 268 Skinner, John 515606 86 PARAMEDIC PMD 519071 N/A 12/1/2018 268 Smith, Justin M 744 86 PARAMEDIC 502297 N/A 12/1/2018 268 Snead, Jasper 694 86 PARAMEDIC 525391 N/A 12/1/2018 268 iSparkman, Cody M 718 86 PARAMEDIC 532317 N/A 12/1/2018 268 I Suba, Gabriel 5G3227 86 PARAMEDIC PMD 523404 N/A 12/1/2018 268 'Thomas, Kristen 714 86 PARAMEDIC PMD531925 N/A 12/1/2018 268 i ,Thompson, Jacquelyn 820 86 PARAMEDIC 532450 N/A 12/1/2018 268 Toth, Michael 505386 86 PARAMEDIC 531683 N/A 12/1/2018 268 'Visser, Tjeerd V1`8337 86 PARAMEDIC 14356 N/A 12/7/2018 268 Weatherly, Michael G WM8770 86 PARAMEDIC :Y 527397 N/A 12/1/2018 268 9 Williams, James D 622 86 PARAMEDIC 500409 N/A 12/1/2018 268 Page 1 of 1 44 Back https://www.epro-plus.com/EPS/Employee/CertificationRpt.asp 3/8/2018 Employee Certification Status 'Mr CL 8 Employee > Credential Reports> Employee Certification Status Page 1 of 2 45 Back Mins://www.enro-nlus.com/EPS/EmDlbvee/CertificationRDt.asD 3/8/2018 Query Type Certification Credential Type Show All V Driven License v -All - v Home Cost Center Status Output Format -Ali-ARive v QQ o o Query _..._._,.�.......,.- 'All Drivers License Certifications On Record __.�..-. ----- _.__ ^ Employee Emp. ID Cost Center Certification View Number Effective Expires Days To Exp. Notes Ahmad -Khan, Robert, FTO AR6016 86 Driven License r ,i A532-777-73-221-0 N/A 6/21/2022 1566 Almanza, Linda AL4693 86 Drivers License t"i,, A455.520-80-964-0 N/A 12/24/2020 1022 'Alvarez, Jason .015533 86 Driven License A416-020-77-310-0 N/A 8/30/2018 175 ! Anderson, Corey AC2574 87 Drivers License A536.118.86.458-0 N/A 12/18/2021 1381 j Apollon, Sebastlen 793 85 Drivers License i ti A145794924070 N/A 11/7/2025 2801 i Bacelo, Michael, FTO SM9003 86 Drivers License >" 8240-540.80.126-0 N/A 4/6/2023 1855 Baldwin, Christopher 697 85 Driven License 843511397066-0 N/A 2/26/2021 1086 Bernier, Edgar 678 86 Drivers License z 8656-210.78.208-0 N/A 6/6/2019 455 Berube, Vanessa 739 85 Drivers License { 8610872816290 N/A 4/9/2019 397 Bibbs, Harold 583 87 Driven License 8120356902110 N/A 6/11/2021 1191 i Bibbs, Tua 579 94 Driven License 8120817918430 N/A 6/23/2021 1203 i Bottoms, Erik O DE0702 86 Drivers License B3S2.214-79-042-D N/A 12/2/2025 2826 Brown, Jeffery L 810534 85 Drivers License i_{ 8650-432-70-335-0 N/A 9/15/2025 2748 Bruscia, Benjamin 822 85 Drivers License 8620063924270 N/A 11/27/2022 1725 'Burgos, Javier 769 85 Drivers License 8622433953900 N/A 10/30/2019 601 Camlel, Cory H 754 85 Driven License C540100923690 N/A 10/9/2022 1676 -,Canada, PheonixJ 779 88 Driven License C530670871650 N/A 5/5/2022 1519 Capdo, NicholsA 777 95 Drivers License C160621941330 N/A 4/13/2015 36 'Cardone, Paul 505603 85 Drivers License C.y C635681864570 N/A 4/9/2019 397 Carreiro, Thomas M 760 86 Drivers License 0660-833.88.324-0 N/A 9/4/2024 2372 ' Cianne, Junior 658 85 Drivers License fy C500-025.94-446-0 N/A 6/29/2018 113 I Corso,John 794 85 Drivers License 0620472943110 N/A 8/31/2018 176 Couch, Donald A 774 85 Drivers License 0200181930620 N/A 2/22/2022 1447 Crespi, Alexander) 596 86 Drivers License C C621010943790 N/A 10/19/2018 225 i DeFriest, Michael l 613 85 Drivers License Ci D162550924280 N/A 11/28/2022 1726 'Dennis, John DJ0934 83 Driven License D520-473-80-175-0 N/A 5/15/2020 799 DeSouza, Michael OMS669 83 Driven License D220.541-60-016-0 N/A 1/16/2019 314 ' Dorado Mendez, Edundo 807 85 Drivers License D635200920960 N/A 3/16/2023 1834 Downs, Alfred 813 87 Drivers License D520000520950 N/A 3/15/2025 2564 Non -Medical Doyle, Christopher W DC0381 86 Drivers License ;L:, D400119880630 N/A 2/23/2019 352 '. Fand, Megan R 775 86 Drivers License F300556976350 N/A 4/15/2021 1134 Fairweather, lerrei 710 85 Drivers License_ F636436950230 N/A 1/23/2019 321 French, Jeremy FJ3431 85 Driven License F652-435.91.086-0 N/A 3/6/2021 1094 Fuller, April FA4285 85 Drivers License F46001ZB25480 N/A 2/8/2019 337 !Fusco, Anthony 796 85 Drivers License F200010933810 N/A 10/21/2025 2784 Gardner, Robert S 719 85 Drivers License ii G635-777-89.299.0 N/A 8/19/2019 529 Giaccio, Mike, FTO 708 85 Driven License C" G200-550-84.186-0 N/A 5/26/2019 444 1 Giles, Taryn C 817 84 Drivers License (r G420.803.88.556-0 N/A 2/16/2021 1076 Glennon, Matthew 785 85 Drivers License G455 -S53 -9D-296.0 N/A 8/16/2025 2718 Glenton, Kyle 797 85 Drivers License 6453518953270 N/A 9/7/2019 548 Gobler, Brooks 695 85 Drivers License G146-078-95-044-0 N/A 2/4/2019 333 Gonzalez III, Manace, FTO GM1882 83 Driven License t G524-SS088-350-0 N/A 9/30/2018 206 Gower, Tanner, FTO W 764 85 Drivers License G600819904530 N/A 12/13/2021 1376 Grivas, Kristina 607 86 Drivers License G612-500-83-503.0 N/A 1/3/2023 1762 Gutierrez, George 766 SS Divers Licemr- G352.3335.92"-201-0 PVA. 51112018 95 Haggerty, Patrick HP9778 86 Drivers License H263679942970 N/A 8/17/2018 162 �Hantel, Curtis 787 85 Drivers License H524110644120 N/A 11/12/2024 2441 Henderson, Mario HM4165 86 Drivers License H536551784300 N/A 11/30/2018 267 Hodge, Austin 703 65 Drivers Licence H320012921370 N/A 4/17;2015 40 i Hood, Ashley N S06 84 Driven License H300014917691 N/A N/A N/A Hord, Denise W HD2395 86 Driven License H630.179.59-825-0 N/A 9/5/2025 2738 Horton, Mariana 655 86 Drivers License H635-552-91-708-0 N/A 6/8/2023 1918 Humann, Sean M 825 168 Drivers License H550793883870 N/A 10/27/2025 2790 Hunter, Christopher FTO HC9076 86 Drivers License -� H536.113.88-043-0 N/A 2/3/2026 2889 Jacques, John 8 i 791 87 Drivers License 1220462913380 N/A 9/9/2018 185 Johnson, Michelle A 601 86 Drivers Ucense 1525-541.88.869-0 N/A 10/9/2018 215 Keller, Andrea PA7889 86 Drivers License K460-016-79-726-0 N/A 6/26/2022 1571 Page 1 of 2 45 Back Mins://www.enro-nlus.com/EPS/EmDlbvee/CertificationRDt.asD 3/8/2018 Employee Certification Status i King, Adam J 751 85 Ledingham, Sean 661 85 Mace, Jahn M13217 86 Machesko, Joseph 674 85 Mangola, Jacob, FTO MF5761 85 Martian, Elijah R 826 168 Masters, Daniel MD7546 86 Maurer, Jake 824 85 Mcglothiin, Lance ML6262 86 i McKenney, Carl 001 Menardy, Franchesca 799 86 Miller, Katherine A 627 85 Morrison, lames M 642 86 Moynihan, Lindsey ML4075 85 'Murray -Johnson, Kathlene m 810 I 85 i Neisius, Sarah, FTO NS7920 86 Nocita, Kimberly A 621 85 ?Ortiz, Jacob 673 85 Parrish, Kristopher, FTO PK4310 86 .'-Payne, Matthew 553 86 'Phillips, Lorne PL2870 86 P Phillips, Vincent PV8512 85 Pieler, John 821 85 Piloto, Christopher) I 6077 85 Poches, Alexander 800 BS Ramirez, Alejandro 828 168 Reid Sheila, PTO 854894 86 Reinhard, Rochelle 648 86 Reinhold, Frederick RF1837 88 Reuther, Matthew RM6500 86 i Ruff, Cody 802 85 Saivesen, John 518162 83 Seipel, Ashley 815 85 Selph, Tanner 554 86 %Sewell, Karen 664 86 Skinner, John 515606 86 Smith, Justin M 744 86 Snead, Jasper 694 86 ? Sparkman, Cody M 718 86 Spinetta, Michael V 830 268 Suba, Gabriel SG 1227 86 ;Thomas, Kristen 714 86 ':. Thompson, Jacquelyn 820 86 Torres Ramirez, Alberto 788 85 :Toth, Michael V 505386 86 j Toussaint, Emmanuel C 811 87 Tse, Tai-Tjing Q 763 85 !Visser, Tjeen! VT3337 56 i Weatherly, Michael G WM8770 86 Whalen-Nenik, Matthew 735 85 Williams, Corey 804 85 Williams, James D 622 86 Young, Kevin T 831 168 Zit., Amanda L 561 64 Drivers License KS20010811780 N/A S/1/2023 Drivers License L352798932260 N/A 4/6/202S Driven License M200476820540 N/A 2/24/2020 Drivers License M220.492.93-175-0 N/A 5/15/2025 Drivers License M524.430.90.100-0 N/A 3/20/2022 Driven License M635216972490 N/A 7/29/2021 Drivers License M2361709G3260 N/A 9/6/2020 Drivers License to M660425962290 N/A 6/29/2020 Drivers License M243530882240 N/A 6/24/2018 Drivers License M250125742140 N/A 6/14/2020 Drivers Uceme M563254857080 N/A 6/8/2019 Drivers License M460501928500 N/A 9/30/2022 Drivers License M6254S3901470 N/A 4/27/2019 Drivers License k`.. MSSO.534.84-742-0 N/A 7/2/2020 Drivers License M625513926760 N/A 5/16/2026 Drivers License N220-781-73.745-1 N/A 7/5/2021 Drivers License N230501937670 N/A 7/27/2021 Drivers License tii 0632432-93-135-0 N/A 4/15/2025 Drivers License i. P6205128742SO N/A 11/25/2025 Drivers License PSOOSS8914060 NIA 12/6/2021 Drivers License P412530998640 NIA 10/4/2021 Drivers License `" P412-878.86.377-0 N/A 10/17/2025 Drivers License P460476963770 N/A 10/17/2020 Drivers License P430-110.79-291-0 N/A 8/11/2021 Drivers License P220007970140 N/A 1/14/2021 Drivers License R562000842060 N/A N/A Drivers License 8300.785-78-508-0 N/A 1/8/2021 Drivers License Cy R563730666860 N/A 5/26/2025 Driven License R543-259.65.111-0 N/A 3/31/2019 Drivers License R360556900170 N/A 1/17/2020 Driven License R1001OS970910 N/A 3/11/2021 Driven License 5412470.54-012-0 1/27/2010 1/12/2019 Drivers License 5140012968620 N/A 10/2/2021 Drivers License 5410815932960 N/A 8/16/2023 Drivers License 5400.513-95-826-0 N/A 9/6/2019 Driven License 5560464863050 N/A 8/25/2022 Driven License 5530433WM270 N/A 11/27/2020 Drivers License 5530438-86-046-0 N/A 2/6/2019 Drivers License tk 5162-113.95-174-0 N/A 5/14/2019 Drivers Ucense 5153558970420 N/A 2/20/2020 Drivers License 5100260862670 NIA 7/27/2025 Drivers License i;, 7520.514-92-545-0 N/A N/A Drivers License T5124329S68SO NIA 5/25/2019 Driven Ucense 7626.014-95-296-0 N/A 7/25/2018 Driven License 7300558640570 N/A 2/17/2026 Drivers Ucense 7253203830420 N/A 2/2/2025 Drivers License 7200315953090 N/A 8/30/2019 Driven License :{ V2608Ut661740 NIA 5/ia/2016 Drivers License ! ;- W364-547-70.189-0 N/A 5/29/2019 Driven License W455546963300 N/A 9/10/2020 Driven License W452115894110 N/A 11/11/2022 Drivers License W452444750611 N/A 2/21/2019 Drivers License Y5Z0518932640 N/A 7/24/2023 DH"irs Licence 2300012'c67050 N!A 6/5/2018 N/A N/A 1880 2586 718 2625 1473 1239 913 844 108 829 457 1667 415 847 2991 1215 1237 2595 2819 1339 1306 2780 954 1252 1043 1037 2636 388 680 1099 310 1304 1987 547 1631 995 335 432 714 2698 443 139 2903 2523 Non -Medical 540 67 447 917 1709 350 1964 II9 Page 2 of 2 46 httnc•//www enrn-nbic rnm/RP.q/RmnlnvPP/C..ertificatinnRnt.asn 3/8/2018 Employee Certification Status * fT 8 Employee> Credential Reports> Employee Certification Status Query Type Certification Credential Type N0 Expiration Date EVOC V E, fications V Home Cost Center Status Output format -All- v, rAtTe v OQ OQ O@ Query Afi EVOC Certifications Without Explratl Employee Emp. ID ;Ahmad -Khan, Robert, FTO ARS016 iAlmanza, Linda AL4693 'Alvarez, Jason AJ5533 Apollon, Sebastian 793 !Bacelo, Michael, FTO SM9003 Baldwin, Christopher 697 Bernier, Edgar 678 Berube, Vanessa 739 Bottoms, Erik SED702 Brown, Jeffery L 810534 !Bruscia, Benjamin 822 1 Burgos, Javier 769 f Camlel, Cory H 754 f Caprio, Nicholas A 777 Cardone, Paul A 505603 i Carrelro, Thomas M 760 fCianne,lunlor 658 !Corso,lohn 794 I N/A Couch, Donald A 774 'Crespi, Alexander) 596 k DeFriest, Michael l 613 ;Dennis,John 010934 N/A N/A N/A DeSouza, Michael DM5669 Dorado Mendez, Edurado 807 Doyle, Christopher W DC0391 ;Fand, Megan R 775 1 Fairweather, Jerrel 710 I S French, Jeremy Fuller, April Fusco, Anthony j Gardner, Robert 5 1Giaccio, Mike, FTO )Glennon, Matthew !Glenton, Kyle i Goble4 Brooks Gonzalez III, Menace, FTO !Gower,Tanner, FTO W t :Grivas, Kristina Gutierrez, George ;Haggerty, Patrick Henderson, Mario Hodge, Austin !Hord, Denise W rHorton, Mariana iHumann, Sean M I Hunter, Christopher FTO 'Jacques, John B iJohnson, Michelle A Keller, Andrea King, Adam 1 Ledingham, Sean Loewe, Sheri L Mace, John Machesko, Joseph Mangola, Jacob, FTO Martian, Elijah R m Date - Certlficatlonss 85 EVOC - Cost Center Certification View Number Effective Expires Days To Exp. Notes 86 EVOC �,.`, 4/12/2002 N/A N/A 86 EVOC 85 N/A N/A -N/A 86 EVOC 719 N/A N/A N/A 85 EVOC N/A 12/5/2014 N/A N/A 86 EVOC f.. N/A N/A N/A 85 EVOC N/A N/A N/A 86 EVOC i N/A N/A N/A 85 EVOC '. 85 4/17/2016 N/A N/A 86 EVOC GM1882 N/A N/A N/A 85 EVOC ,5:� N/A N/A N/A 85 EVOC 11/20/2016 N/A 1/19/2018 N/A N/A 85 EVOC 12/22/2016 N/A N/A 85 EVOC EVOC 7/23/2016 N/A N/A 85 EVOC 86 N/A N/A N/A 85 EVOC %y N/A N/A N/A 86 EVOC N/A 11/7/2016 N/A N/A 85 EVOC fL N/A N/A N/A 85 EVOC 5/16/2017 N/A N/A 85 EVOC EVOC N/A N/A N/A 86 EVOC 1% N/A N/A N/A g5 EVOC r N/A N/A N/A 83 EVOC N/A N/A N/A N/A 83 EVOC N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 85 EVOC 4/17/2016 N/A N/A 86 EVOC EVOC N/A N/A N/A 86 EVOC 85 5/12/2016 N/A N/A 85 EVOC 661 N/A N/A N/A Does not have one in his N/A N/A N/A 805 file. FJ3431 85 EVOC N/A N/A N/A FA4285 85 EVOC N/A N/A N/A 796 85 EVOC 11/20/2015 N/A N/A 719 85 EVOC N/A N/A N/A 708 g5 EVOC N/A N/A N/A 785 85 EVOC 5/18/2016 N/A N/A 797 85 EVOC 5/25/2017 N/A N/A 695 85 EVOC N/A N/A N/A GM1882 83 EVOC N/A N/A N/A 764 85 EVOC 11/20/2016 N/A N/A 607 66 EVOC 11/15/2014 N/A N/A 786 85 EVOC 2/26/2017 N/A N/A HP9778 86 EVOC N/A N/A N/A HM4165 86 EVOC N/A N/A N/A 703 85 EVOC 5/28/2014 N/A N/A HD2395 86 EVOC N/A N/A N/A 655 86 EVOC 4/26/2015 N/A N/A 82S 168 EVOC 11/22/2008 N/A N/A HC9076 86 EVOC N/A N/A N/A 791 87 EVOC N/A N/A N/A 601 86 EVOC 7/13/2013 N/A N/A PA7989 86 EVOC N/A N/A N/A 751 85 EVOC 7/1/2016 N/A N/A 661 85 EVOC N/A N/A N/A 805 86 EVOC 8/10/2003 N/A N/A M13217 86 EVOC N/A N/A N/A 674 85 EVOC N/A N/A N/A MF5761 85 EVOC N/A N/A N/A 826 168 EVOC 1/21/2018 N/A N/A "Z Page 1 of 2 47 Back httns://www.euro-nlus.com/EPS/Emnlovee/CertificationRpt.asp 3/8/2018 Employee Certification Status 'Masters, Daniel MD7546 86 EVOC N/A N/A NIA 1 Maurer, Jake 824 85 EVOC (. N/A N/A N/A McDermott, Thomas R 827 85 EVOC 2/27/2018 N/A N/A Mcgiothlin, Lance s ML6262 86 EVOC N/A N/A N/A s McKenney, Carl 001 EVOC N/A N/A N/A i Menardy, Pranchesca 799 86 EVOC 12/5/2004 N/A N/A Michel, 5mithlln 816 85 EVOC 8/19/2017 N/A N/A Miller, Katherine A 627 85 EVOC 9/13/2014 N/A N/A Morrison, James M e 642 86 EVOC 4/25/2009 N/A NIA Moynihan, Lindsey ML4075 85 EVOC N/A N/A N/A Murray -Johnson, Kathlene m 810 85 EVOC 9/24/2017 N/A N/A ( Neisius, Sarah, FTO N57920 86 EVOC N/A N/A N/A Noeita, Kimberly A 621 85 EVOC 11/10/2013 N/A NIA t {Ortiz,lacob 673 8s EVOC ?1 NIA N/A N/A i Parrish, Krlstopher, FTO PK4310 86 EVOC N/A N/A N/A 1 Payne, Matthew 5S3 86 EVOC 4/28/2012 NIA NIA 'Phillips, Lome PL2870 86 EVOC N/A N/A N/A I Phillips, Vincent PVSS12 95 EVOC N/A N/A N/A Pleler, John 821 85 EVOC 5/16/2016 NIA N/A Piloto, Christopher! 6077 85 EVOC N/A N/A N/A Pcches, Alexander Sao 85 EVOC 1/20/2017 NIA N/A 1 Reid, Sheila, FTO F 854894 86 EVOC N/A N/A N/A ! Reinhard, Rochelle 648 86 EVOC N/A NIA N/A Reuther, Matthew RM6500 86 EVOC NIA N/A N/A Ruff, Cody 802 8s EVOC 5/16/2017 N/A N/A ;Seipel, Ashley 815 85 EVOC 8/17/1017 N/A N/A 1Selph, Tanner 554 86 EVOC. 11/3/2012 N/A N/A Sewell, Karen 664 86 EVOC N/A N/A N/A Skinner, John 515606 86 EVOC N/A N/A N/A !ISmith,JustlnM 744 86 EVOC 10/25/2000 N/A N/A Snead, Jasper 694 86 EVOC N/A N/A N/A Sparkman, Cody M 718 86 EVOC N/A N/A N/A Spinetta, Michael V 830 168 EVOC 8/112017 NIA N/A Suba, Gabriel SG1227 86 EVOC N/A N/A N/A 'Thomas, Kristen 714 86 EVOC 1/4/2016 N/A N/A ? Thompson, Jacquelyn 820 86 EVOC 4/15/2016 N/A N/A !Torres Ramirez, Alberto 788 85 EVOC 3/24/2017 N/A N/A Toth, Michael $05386 86 EVOC N/A N/A N/A Tse,Tal-TjingQ 763 85 EVOC 6/17/2016 N/A N/A jVisser,Tjeerd VT8337 86 EVOC ;` N/A N/A N/A Weatherly, Michael G WM8770 86 EVOC =.i N/A N/A N/A Whalen-Henik Matthew 735 85 EVOC 6/16/2016 N/A N/A Williams, Corey 804 85 EVOC 7/23/2016 NIA N/A young, Kevin T 831 168 EVOC 4/26/2015 N/A N/A Page 2 of 2 48 httnc-//www.enrn-nlnc cnm/RPC/Rmnlnvee/CertificgtinnRnt.asn 3/R/9.01 R Fee 49 Published Rates 2017 All County Ambulance Base Rate Mileage Rural Mileage Waiting Time Per 1/2 Hr ALS Non -E $517.00 10.51 BLS Non -E $285.00 10.51 SCT $900.00 10.51 Waiting Time First 30 min Free Non -Medical Stretcher $100.00 $4.50 Wheelchair Service $70.00 $3.50 Ambulatory Service $40.00 $2.00 $30.00 50 CONSENT INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA MEMORANDUM TO: Honorable Board of County Commissioners THROUGH: Jason E. Brown, County Administrator THROUGH: John King, Director Department of Emergency Services FROM: Cory Richter, Battalion Chief Department of Emergency Services Fire Rescue DATE: March 9, 2018 SUBJECT: Approval of Renewal for a Class `B" Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity for Falck Southeast II, Corp d/b/a American Ambulance Service to Provide Interfacility Ambulance Transportation Services. It is respectfully requested that the information contained herein be given formal consideration by the Board of County Commissioners at the next scheduled meeting. DESCRIPTION On March 1, 2016, the Indian River County Board of County Commissioners approved a renewal for a Class `B" Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity for Falck Southeast II, Corp d/b/a American Ambulance Service to provide interfacility ambulance medical transportation originating within Indian River County. This certificate was necessary in order to comply with Indian River Code of Laws and Ordinances as specified in Chapter 304. The certificate was approved for a period of two (2) years and will expire March 27, 2018. The Indian River County Code provides for routine renewal of the EMS Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity on an application by the certificate holder. This can be accomplished without a public hearing if the Board has no reason to believe that the public health, safety, and welfare require it. Staff submits that there is no reason to hold a public hearing and absent that requirement, the Board is requested to renew the certificate. An application for the renewal of the Class "B" Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity has been submitted by Falck Southeast II, Corp d/b/a American Ambulance Service. Staff has reviewed the application and no reasons are known or perceived that would require a public hearing pursuant to the established ordinance. 52 FUNDING: There are no funding requirements for this item. RECOMMENDATION: Staff respectfully recommends that the Board of County Commissioners approve renewal of the Class `B" Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity for Falck Southeast II, Corp d/b/a American Ambulance Service, to be effective for a period of two (2) years from March 27, 2018 to March 27, 2020. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Renewal Application from Falck Southeast 11, Corp d/b/a American Ambulance Service 2. Two (2) Certificates of Public Convenience and Necessity for Falck Southeast][[, Corp d/b/a American Ambulance Service for signature 53 PSM,- INDIAN RIVER COUNTY �QPs•�F O ° DEPARTMENT OF EMERGENCY SERVICES 9�-N�s�P, APPLICATION FOR CERTIFICATE OF PUBLIC CONVENIENCE AND NECESSITY (COPCN) ANT;NAME: Falck Southeast II Corp d/b/a American Ambulance Service March 8, 2018 APPLICATION FEE: $100.00 APPLIES TO INITIAL APPLICATIONS ONLY. If payment applicable, make check payable to INDIAN RIVER COUNTY FIRE RESCUE. ❑ This is a new application; fee is attached. ® This is a renewal of our present COPCN. ❑ This is a renewal of our present COCPN with ownership or classification changes. CLASSIFICATION OF CERTIFICATE REQUESTED Please check applicable boxes and options. Class A ❑ _BLS _ALS Governmental entities that use advanced life support vehicles to conduct a pre- hospital EMS ALS/BLS service. Class B ® X BLS X ALS Agencies that -provide non -emergency ambulance inter -facility medical transport at the ALS/BLS level. Class C ❑ _BLS ALS Agencies that provide non -emergency ambulance inter -facility medical transports which require special clinical capabilities and require a physician's order. Class D ❑ _BLS _ALS Agencies that provide non -emergency ambulance medical transports limited to out of county transfers. Class E ❑ Wheelchair Wheelchair/Stretcher Ambulatory Transport Agencies that provide wheelchair transportation service only where said s�ric� are paid for in part or in whole either directly or indirectly with government f�d�Q. Class E1 ❑ Wheelchair Wheelchair/Stretcher Ambulatory TransR§t Agencies that provide wheelchair vehicle service where said services are n„�ot pZ6 for in part or in whole either directly or indirectly with government funds. r i,2rn PQ -Cpm' 54 C:\Users\jsalvesen\Desktop\Indian River COPCN 20181American Ambulance Service COPCN 2018.doc 1 II. COMPANY DETAILS 1. NAME OF AMBULANCE SERVICE: American Ambulance Service MAILING ADDRESS: 4227 Saint Lucie Blvd CITY Ft. Pierce, COUNTY St. Lucie, FI ZIP CODE: 34946 BUSINESS PHONE: 772-465-1111 2. TYPE OF OWNERSHIP(i.e. Private, Government, Volunteer, Partnership, etc.): 3. MANAGER'S NAME: Michael DeSouza ADDRESS: 4227 St. Lucie Blvd, Ft Pierce, FI 34946 PHONE #: 772-465-1111 4. PROVIDE NAME OF OWNER(s) OR LIST ALL OFFICERS, PARTNERS, DIRECTORS, AND SHAREHOLDERS, IF A.CORPORATION (attach a separate sheet if necessary): NAME ADDRESS POSITION Charles Maymon 6605 NW 74th Ave Miami, FI 33166 President/ VP/ Treasure Brian Richmond 6605 NW 74th Ave Miami, FI 33166 Secretary 5. PROVIDE NAMES AND ADDRESSES OF AT LEAST THREE (3) LOCAL REFERENCES NAME ADDRESS John Skalko 1000.37th Street Vero Beach, 32960 PHONE # 772-567-2552 Will Talbert 131037 th Street Vero Beach, 32960 772-569-5107 Darleen Silverstein 100037 th Street Vero Beach, 32960 772-567-4311 C:\Users\jsalvesen\Desktop\Indian River COPCN 2018\American Ambulance Service COPCN 2018.doc 55 6. FUNDING SOURCE: Private 7. RATE SCHEDULE ATTACHED? YES ❑ NO ❑ N/A ❑ 8. LIST THE ADDRESS(es) OF YOUR BASE AND ALL SUB -STATIONS: Main Office 4227 St. Lucie Blvd Ft. Pierce, FI 34946 Indian River Medical Center 1000 37th Street Vero Beach, FI 32960 III. COMMUNICATIONS INFORMATION: TYPES OF RADIOS/EQUIPMENT: See Attached 1. RADIO FREQUENCY (ies) See Attached 2. RADIO CALL NUMBER(s) 4. LIST ALL HOSPITALS AND OTHER EMERGENCY AGENCIES WITH WHICH YOU HAVE DIRECT RADIO COMMUNICATIONS: FROM AMBULANCE Statewide Med 8 Holmes Regional Medical Center Lawnwood Regional Medical Center FROM BASE STATION Statewide Med 8 C:\Usersljsalvesen\Desktop\Indian River COPCN 2018\American Ambulance Service COPCN 2018.doc 56 IV. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUIRED TO BE SUBMITTED WITH THIS APPLICATION: 1. Factual Statement indicating the public need and services, including studies supporting the demonstrated demand and feasibility for the proposed service(s) and deficiencies in existing services, and any other.pertinent data you wish to be considered. 2. Factual statement of the proposed services to be provided, including type of service, hours and days of operation, market to be served, geographic areas to be serviced, and any other pertinent data you wish to be considered. 3. Factual Statement indicating the ability of the applicant to manage and provide the proposed services, including the management plan, maintenance facilities, insurance program, accounting system, system for handling complaints, system for handling accidents and injuries, system for providing the county monthly operating reports and any other pertinent data you wish to be considered. 4. Copy of Standard Operating Procedures. On File IRFD 5. Copy of Medical Protocols. On File IRFD 6. Copy of your insurance policy — must show coverage limits — On File IRFD 7. Vehicle Information. For each vehicle provide the following: See Attached a. Make, Model, Year, Manufacturer b. Mileage c. VIN # d. Tag Number e. Passenger capacity (E/E1 classification) f. Indicate ALS/BLS (A -D classification) 8. Personnel Roster. For each employee provide the following: See Attached a. Name — Last, First and Middle Initial b. Driver's License # (if commercial, specify class) & Expiration Date ADDITIONAL INFO REQUIRED FOR A -D classifications c. Emergency Medical Service Certification and # (EMT or Paramedic) d. Expiration date of Certification e. Whether or not has an Emergency Vehicle Operation Certificate. 9. Fee Schedule Including: See Attached Service Type; Base Rate, Mileage, Waiting and Special Charges C:\Users\jsalvesen\Desktop\Indian River COPCN 2018\American Ambulance Service COPCN 2018.doc 5 4 V. NOTARIZED STATEMENTS Fill in Statements as applicable. Eo APPLIC S I, Michael DeSouza, the representative of Applicant Name American Ambulance Service, do hereby attest that the Business Name of Service above named service meets all the requirements of, and that I agree to comply with, all applicable provisions of Chapter 304, Life Support and Wheelchair Services. A -D. APPLICANTS I, Michael DeSouza , the representative of Applicant Name American Ambulance Service, do hereby attest that Business Name of Service the above named service will provide continuous service on a 24-hour, 7 -day week basis. I do hereby attest that the above named service meets all the requirements for operation of an ambulance service in the State of Florida as provided in Chapter 401, Part III, Florida Statutes, Chapter 64E-2, Florida Administrative Code, and that I agree to comply with all the provisions of Chapter 304, Life Support Services. ALL`APPLICANTS further acknowledge that discrepancies discovered during the effective period of the Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity will subject this service and its authorized representatives to corrective action and penalty provided in the referenced authority and that to the best of my knowledge, all statements on this application are true and correct. 3 /06JI& APPLICANT 4tAATURE DATE Before me personally appeared the said M*i ofhat_I t ,c-souz--a who says that he/she executed the above instrument of his/her own free will and accord, with full knowledge of the purpose thereof. Sworn and subscribed in my presence this 8 day of March, 2018.`-44 Qe r,-, a , (�� Q � � My commission expires: oaj NOTARY PUBLIC CSAR Felecia Olmstead oar NOTARY PUBLIC g c STATE OF FLORIDA ? Comm# GG064369 58 C:\Users\jsalvesen\Desktop\ln Iver W2*dl jcan Ambulance Service COPCN 2018.doc 0, ffl�,5fiw VIRT 59 ----=---.-----.-----------------------_-_-- Vehicle I_nforrna on -20.1 ---____— ---- :i�fn' 3�! y'?�5�t� 08 -Mar -18 4227 St. Lucie Blvd., Ft. Pierce FL 34946 60 Ambulance Unit Service Year Make Model Type Vin # Vehicle Tag 219 ALS 2009 Chevy 3500 II 1GBHG396791182489 MIJ28P 221 ALS 2013 Ford E-350 III 1 FDWE3FS6DDA22679 MIK28H 222 BLS 2008 Ford E-350 II 1 FDSS34P98DB47736 MIK62H 223 BLS 2009 Ford E-350 II 1 FDSS34P59DA22735 MIK65H 224 ALS 2014 Ford E-350 II 1 FDSS3EL6EDA82707 MIK71 H 225 ALS 2014 Ford E-350 II 1 FDSS3EL7EDB15147 MIL62R 226 BLS 2014 Ford E-350 II 1 FDSS3EL1 EDB15144 MIL61 R 227 ALS 2016 Ford E-350 III 1 FDWE3FS9GDC14196 MIM67A 228 ALS 2014 Ford E350 II 1FDSS3EL9EDB07292 MIM81A 229 ALS 2011 Ford E350 II 1 FDSS3EL3BDB23810 MFY30B 230 BLS 2013 Ford E350 II 1FDSS3ELADDA78427 MFY29B 231 BLS 2013 Ford E350 II 1FDSS3EL4DDA75205 MFY27B 232 ALS 2011 Ford E350 1 1 FDSS3EL6BDB25874 MFZ55C 233 234 ALS ALS 2015 2011 Ford Ford E350 E350 III 111 1 FDWE3FS6FDA16139 1 FDWE3FS6BDB20382 MFY 28B MIK 981 N -Med Unit Service Year Make Model Type Vin # Vehicle Tag 609 MTS 2003 Ford E-250 W/C 1 FTNE24243HA86367 BIQJ57 612 ACA 2013 Ford E-150 NMS 1 FTNSl EWODDA22694 BVAQ33 --61.4-- —ACA--- --2008- ---Ford-- --E-1.50— -W-/C- - --1 F-TNE-1-4W88DA92216-- ------ -CUTN07- - 615 ACA 2013 FORD E-150 Combo 1 FTNS2EWXDDB26549 CFTU08 60 61 Page 1 of 1 /��®�®® _ CERTIFICATE OF LIABIL NSI➢ NCE__ - DATE (MM/DDNYYY)(M -09/-26/2-017--- THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AFFIRMATIVELY OR NEGATIVELY AMEND, EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW. THIS CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A CONTRACT BETWEEN THE ISSUING INSURER(S), AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE OR PRODUCER, AND THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. IMPORTANT: If the certificate holder is an ADDITIONAL INSURED, the policy(les) must have ADDITIONAL INSURED provisions or be endorsed. If SUBROGATION IS WAIVED, subject to the terms and conditions of the policy, certain policies may require an endorsement. A statement on this certificate does not confer rights to the certificate holder in lieu of such endorsement(s). PRODUCER Willis of Seattle, Inc. c/o 26 Century Blvd P.O. Box 305191 CONTACT NAME: PHONE 1-877-945-7378 FAX No: 1-888-467-2378 E-MAIL certificates@willis.com DD ESS: INSURERS AFFORDING COVERAGE NAIC If Nashville, TN 372305191 USA INSURERA: Coverys Specialty Insurance Company 15686 EACH OCCURRENCE $ 1,000,000 INSURED Falck Southeast II, Corp. d/b/a All County Ambulance INSURER B: Steadfast Insurance Company 26387 4227 St. Lucie Blvd INSURER C: INSURER D : Fort Pierce, 'FL 34946 USA INSURER E: INSURER F: LIABILITY ANY AUTO OWNED SCHEDULED AUTOS ONLY AUTOS HIRED NON -OWNED AUTOS ONLY AUTOS ONLY COVERAGES CERTIFICATE NUMBER: W3657692 REVISION NUMBER: THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED. NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT, TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS, EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES. LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS. ILSR TYPE OF INSURANCE ADDL SUER POLICYNUMBER MMIDO EFF POLICY EXP LIMITS A X COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY CLAIMS -MADE � OCCUR X Products -Claims Made 5-10013 10/01/2017 10/01/2018 EACH OCCURRENCE $ 1,000,000 PREMISES Ea occurrence $ 1,000,000 MED EXP (Any one person) $ 5,000 PERSONAL BADV INJURY $ 1,000,000 GEN'L AGGREGATE LIMIT APPLIES PER: POLICY ❑ PRO a LOC X JECT OTHER: GENERAL AGGREGATE $ 2,000,000 PRODUCTS - COMP/OP AGG $ 2,000,000 $ AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY ANY AUTO OWNED SCHEDULED AUTOS ONLY AUTOS HIRED NON -OWNED AUTOS ONLY AUTOS ONLY COMBINED SINGLE LIMIT $ Ea accident BODILY INJURY (Per person) $ BODILY INJURY (Per accident) $ PROPERTY DAMAGE Per accident $ S 8 )(--t7(CESSCIAB- UMBRELLAUAB - X OCCUR X4 14 77 0=04 ---- 10%0172 0"1'/ i070Y%2018 EACH OCCURRENCE $ 15,000,000 _ CLAIMS -MADE AGGREGATE $ 15,000,000 DED RETENTION S $ WORKERS COMPENSATION AND EMPLOYERS' LIABILITY Y / N ANYPROPRIETOR/PARTNER/EXECUTIVE OFFICER/MEM8EREXCLUDE67 " (Mandatory in NH) If yes, describe under DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS below NIA PER OTH- STATUTE ER E.L. EACH ACCIDENT $ E.L. DISEASE - EA EMPLOYEE $ E.L. DISEASE - POLICY LIMIT $ DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS/ LOCATIONS/ VEHICLES (ACORD 101, Additional Remarks Schedule, maybe attached if more space is required) GtK I II -ICA I t HULUtK CANCELLATION Indian River County Fire Department 4225 43rd Avenue Vero Beach, FL 32967 SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE THE EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF, NOTICE WILL BE DELIVERED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE POLICY PROVISIONS. AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE U 19BB-2015 ACORD CORPORATION, All rights reserved. ACORD 25 (2016103) The ACORD name and logo are registered marks of ACORD a . wa • � : ( !! t; t 63 Kenwood Radio system Model # Nx BOOK UHF Digital Transceiver Base Station Location: St. Lucie Co*unty 4227 St. Lucie Blvd Fort Pierce, Fl 34946 match. Conter -27`191 0 1 64 REFERENCE COPY This is not an official FCC license. It is a record of public information contained in the FCC's licensing database on the date that this reference copy was generated. In cases,,yvhere FCC rules require the presentation, posting, or display of an FCC license, this document may not be used in place of an official Fcl(�j�42-M, _ llr�rlv M ' 11may. "Wederal Communications Commission nN M'. Wireless Telecommunications Bureau RADIO STATION AUTHORIZATION SERVICES, LLC ATTN: DAVID A TE16M HIGHLAI\TD WIRELESS S 6894 NW 20TH AVE FORT LAUDERDALE, FL FCC Registration Number (FRN)-. 0005413 Fixed Location Address or Mobile Area of Operation Loc. I Address: 12008 SW MARTIN HVVY (#5050) City; PALM CITY County: MARTIN e: Lat (`4A1:D83):27-07-175 N Long (NAD83): 080J Loc. 2 Area of operation Operating within a 32.0 Ian radius around fixed location I Call Sign File Number WQIYIL866 I - Radio Service IG - Industrial/Business Pool, Coirveational Regulatory Status PURS Frequency Coordination Number SPEMICATIONS No.- 1018575 Ground Elev: 9.8 Loc Ant Frequencies Sta. No. No. Emission Ou Ant, Ant, Construct No. No. (MHz) Cis. Units Pagers Designator HtJTP AAT Deadline meters meters Date 1 000452.22500000 FB6 I I IK2FID 000 250. 140.2 142.5 09-18-2011 I I K2F2D I 1K2F3E 4K00F7W I 000453.00000000 FB6 1 1 IK2F1D 10.0.000 0.000 -.2 142.5 09-18-2011 11 K2F2D 4K00`F7W Conditions: Pursuant to §309(h) of the Communications -Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §309(h), this license is sub' following conditions: This license shall not vest in the licensee any right to operate the station nor a i the frequencies designated in the license beyond the term thereof nor in any other manner than authorize either the, license not the right granted thereunder shall beassigned or otherwise transferred in violation of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended. See 47 U.S.C. § 310(d). This license is subject in terms to the right of use or control conferred by §706 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended. See 47 U.S.C. §606. FCC 601 _ix Page I of 4 August 2 Licensee Name-, HIGHLAND WIRELESS SERVICES, LLC Call Sign, WQM' File Number: Print (Date;. Antennas Loc Ant Frequen Sta. No. No. Emission Output ERP Ant. Ant. Construct No. No. 04111) r Cis. -Units Pagers Designator Power (watts) HtJTp AAT Dezdli)ae (watts) meters meters Date FB6 i IMPID 100.000 250.000 140.2 142.5 09.19-2011 i oowi.s0000000 VV F136 i 11K2F1D 100.000 250,000 140.2 142.5 09-19-2011 I I K2F2D 11 K2F3E 4ROOF.7W 1 000463.20000000 IMPID 100.000 250,000 140,2 142.5 09-18-2011 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 '012 2012 2011 -2011 -2011 3-2011 C Page 2 of 4 FAuC6o Fagg License Nance: HIGHLAND WIRELESS SERVICES, LLC C2)I Sign: WQML Pile Number: PrintDate: Antennas je Los Ant Frecluenc Sta. No. No. Emission Output ERP Ant. Ant. Construct No. No. (MHz) t Cls. Units Pagers Designator Power (watts) HtJTp AAT Deadline (wanks) meters meters Date 2 1 000461.315 M06 90 HUM 1 D 50.000 50.000 09-18-2011 2 1 000466.37500000 A MU6 90 11K2FID 50.000 50,000 09-18-2011 I1K2F2D IIK2F3E 4KOOF7W 2 1 000463,20000000 q 90 11K2171D 50.000 50.000 09-18-2011 2 1 000468.20000000 v 6 11K2F1D 50.000 50.000 09-18-2011 11K2F2D IIK2F3E 4KOOF7W 2 1 000461.80400000 M06 0 11K2FID 50.000 50.000 09-18-2011 11K2F2D E 2 I 000466.80000000 M06 90 11 ID 50.000 50.000 09-18-2011 2 1 2 1 2 1 -2012 i-2012 5-2012 FCC 601 >1 Page 3 of 4 August 7 Licensee Name: MGHLAND WIRELESS SERVICES, LLC FCC 601-L�8 D Page 4 of 4 August 200 MA -11,01, OTIML 69 Employee Certification Status * f? 8 Employee> Credential Reports> Employee Certification Status QueryType Certification Credential Type Show All JEMT V -Ail - V Home Cost Center Status Output Format -AII- V ActMe V OD a 0M 00 Query All EMT Certifications On Record 703 85 EMT 551168 N/A Employee Emp. ID Cost Center Certification View Number Effehive Expires Days To Exp. Notes Alvarez, Jason AJ5533 86 EMT 530016 N/A 12/1/2018 268 Apollon, Sebastien 793 85 EMT 556569 N/A 12/1/2018 268 Baldwin, Christopher 697 a5 EMT 5511055 N/A 12/1/2018 268 Berube, Vanessa 739 85 EMi !r� 551818 N/A 12/112018 268 Brown, JefferyL DJOS34 85 EMT C_ 74531 N/A 12/1/2018 268 Bruscia, Benjamin 822 85 EMT 558205 N/A 12/1/2018 268 Burgos, Javier 769 85 EMT 554280 N/A 12/1/2018 268 Camiel, Cory H 754 85 EMT 554069 N/A 12/1/2018 268 Caprio, Nicholas A 777 65 EMT 554201 N/A 12/1/2018 268 Cardone, Paul 505603 85 EMT f; 550638 N/A 12/1/2018 268 Cianne, Junior 658 85 EMIT G 548570 N/A 12/1/2018 268 Cono,John 794 85 EMT 555494 N/A 12/1/2018 268 Couch, Donald A 774 85 EMT 555035 N/A 12/312018 268 DeFriett, Michael J 613 85 EMT i 545730 N/A 12/1/2018 268 Dorado Mendez, Edurado 807 85 EMT 552938 N/A 12/1/2018 268 Doyle, Christopher W DC0381 86 EMT 527099 N/A 12/3J2018 268 Fand, Megan R 775 85 EMT 552955 N/A 12/1/2018 268 Fairweather, Jerrel 710 85 EMT j;`_; SSSS07 N/A 12/1/2018 268 French,Jeremy FJ3431 85 EMT EMT 535619 N/A 12/1/2018 268 Fuller, April FA4285 85 EMT iq S29178 N/A 12/1/2018 268 Fusco, Anthony 796 85 EMT 556832 N/A 12/1/2018 268 Gardner, Roberts 719 85 EMT i 549017 N/A 12/1/2018 268 Glacclo, Mike, FTO 708 85 EMT C4; 553510 N/A 12/1/2018 268 Glennon, Matthew 785 85 EMT 555499 N/A 12/31/2018 298 Glenton, Kyle 797 85 EMT 555559 N/A 12/1/2018 268 Gobler, Brooks 695 85 EMT (. $48232 N/A 12/1/2018 268 Gonzalez iii, Manace, FTO GM1882 83 EMT !_x 531605 N/A 12/1/2018 268 Gower, Tanner, FTO W 764 85 EMT 553941 N/A 12/1/2018 268 Gutierrez, George 786 85 EMT SS5736 N/A 12/31/2018 298 Haggerty, Patrick HP9778 86 EMT 532805 N/A 12/1/2018 268 Hodge, Austin 703 85 EMT 551168 N/A 12/1/2018 268 Horton, Mariana 655 86 EMT 546510 N/A 12/1/2018 268 Johnson, Michelle A 601 86 EMT 542652 N/A 12/1/2018 268 King, Adam 1 751 85 EMT 550200 N/A 12/1/2018 268 Ledingham, Sean 661 85 EMT 549031 N/A 12/1/2018 268 Loewe, Sheri L 805 86 EMT 308893 N/A 12/1/2018 268 Machesko, Joseph 674 85 EMT 545402 N/A 12/1/2018 268 Mangola, Jacob, Fro MF5761 85 EMT EMT526697 N/A 12/1/2018 268 Martian, Elijah R 826 168 EMT 559678 N/A 12/1/2018 268 Maurer, lake 824 85 EMT tib 556993 N/A 12/1/2018 268 McDermott, Thomas R 827 85 EMT 559317 N/A 12/1/2018 268 Menardy, Franchesca 799 86 EMT 511263 N/A 12/1/2018 268 Michel, Smithlin 816 85 EMT 556918 N/A 12/1/2018 268 Miller, Katherine A 627 85 EMT 545955 N/A 12/3/2018 268 Moynihan, Lindsey ML4075 65 EMT522706 N/A 12/1/2036 268 Murray -Johnson, Kathlene m 810 85 EMT 557346 N/A 12/1/2018 268 Nelslus, Sarah, FTO NS7920 86 EMT 515146 N/A 12/1/2018 268 Nocita, Kimberly A 621 85 EMT 544691 N/A 12/1/2018 268 Ortiz, Jacob 673 RS EMT t".y 549050 N/A 12/1/2018 268 Parrish, Kristopher, FTO PK4310 86 EMT EMT516773 N/A 12/1/2018 268 Phillips, Vincent PV8512 85 EMT EMT532907 N/A 12/1/2018 268 Verif Pieler, John 821 .85 EMT 553007 N/A 12/1/2018 268 Piloto, Christopher) 6077 85 EMT 524645 N/A 12/1/2018 268 Poches, Alexander 800 85 EMT 552884 N/A 12/1/2018 268 Ramirez, Alejandro 828 168 EMT 558275 N/A 12/1/2018 266 Reuther, Matthew RM65DO 86 EMT EMT527844 N/A 12/1/2018 268 Page 1 of 2 70 Back -Ittno-/AAr%xlla/ Pnrn—T3117C nr%m/MAC no" I/Q/71"I'll Q Employee Certification Status Ruf, Cody 802 85 EMT 556742 N/A 12/1/2019 258 Selpel, Ashley 915 85 EMT 557538 N/A 12/1/2018 268 Selph,Tanner 554 86 EMT 541491 8/30/201412/1/2018 268 Sewell, Karen 664 86 EMT 549407 N/A 12/1/2018 268 Sparkman, Cady M 718 86 EMT kj 552101 N/A 12/1/2018 268 Spinetta, Michael V 830 168 EMT 557684 N/A 12/1/2018 268 Thomas, Kristen 714 96 EMT 551515 N/A 12/1/2018 268 Torres Ramirez, Alberto 788 85 EMT 555413 N/A 12/31/2018 298 Tse, Tal•Tjingq 763 85 EMT 553294 N/A 12/1/2018 268 Whalen-Henik, Matthew 735 85 EMT 551497 N/A 12/1/2018 268 Williams, CoreV 804- 85 EMT 555567 N/A 12/1/2018 268 Young, Kevin 831 168 EMT 547342 N/A 12/1/2018 268 Page 2 of 2 71 bans'//www.enrn-nlhi.c rtnm/FPR/FmrtlnvPP/('PrtificatinnRnt acn 2/9/)nT0 Employee Certification Status j}- e i Employee> Credential Reports> Employee Certification Status Parrish, Kristopher, FTO QueryType Certification Credential Type Show All V1 1PARAMEDIC V - All - V Home Cost Center status Output format All - v Active V®Q on 0g] Query All PARAMEDIC Certifications On Record PARAMEDIC n' 527078 N/A 12/1/2018 Employee Emp. ID Cost Center Certification View Number Effective Expires Days To Exp. Notes Ahmad -Khan, Robert, FTO AR6016 86 PARAMEDIC k',',d 206085 N/A 12/1/2018 268 Almanza, Linda ALA693 86 PARAMEDIC K 522577 N/A 12/1/2016 268 Alvarei, Jason A15533 86 PARAMEDIC l�, 522882 N/A 12/1/2018 268 Bacelo, Michael, FTO SM9003 86 PARAMEDIC ck 508284 N/A 12/1/2018 268 Baldwin, Christopher 697 85. PARAMEDIC 532777 N/A 12/1/2018 268 Bernier, Edgar 678 86 PARAMEDIC Z! 513546 N/A 12/1/2018 268 Bottoms, Erik O SE0702 86 PARAMEDIC t% 510676 N/A 12/1/2018 268 Carrelro, Thomas M 760 86 PARAMEDIC 529939 N/A - 12/1/2018 268 Crespi, Alexander J 596 86 PARAMEDIC 527801 N/A 12/1/2018 268 Dennis, John DJ0S34 83 PARAMEDIC N/A 12/1/2018 268 DeSouza, Michael DMS669 83 PARAMEDIC PMD 6657 N/A 12/1/2018 268 Doyle, Christopher W D00381 86 PARAMEDIC ( 526351 N/A 12/1/2018 268 Fand, Megan R 775 86 PARAMEDIC 532282 N/A 12/1/2018 268 Giaccio, Mike, FTO 708 g5 PARAMEDIC 532761 N/A 12/1/2018 268 Grivas, Kristina 607 86 PARAMEDIC 526296 N/A 12/1/2018 268 Haggerty, Patrick HP9778 86 PARAMEDIC PMD 522611 N/A 12/1/2018 268 Henderson, Mario HM4165 86 PARAMEDIC PMD 517353 N/A 12/1/2018 268 Hodge, Austin 703 BS PARAMEDIC N/A 6/1/2019 450 Hord, Denise W HD2395 86 PARAMEDIC PMD 206294 N/A 12/1/2D16 268 Horton, Mariana 655 86 PARAMEDIC 531771 N/A 12/1/2018 268 Human, Sean M 825 168 PARAMEDIC 529827 N/A 12/1/2018 268 Hunter, Christopher FTO HC9076 86 PARAMEDIC PMD522426 N/A 12/1/2018 268 Johnson, Michelle A 601 86 PARAMEDIC 531396 3/29/2017 12/1/2018 268 Keller, Andrea PA7889 86 PARAMEDIC PMD513S62 N/A 12/1/2018 268 Lame, SheriL 805 86 PARAMEDIC 514256 N/A 12/1/2018 268 Mace,John M13217 86 PARAMEDIC PMD 514298 N/A 12/1/2018 268 Masters, Daniel MD7546 86 PARAMEDIC PMD 524373 N/A 12/1/2018 268 Mcglothlin, Lance ML6262 86 PARAMEDIC fit; 529609 N/A 12/1%2018 268 Menardy, Franchesca 799 86 PARAMEDIC 527180 N/A 12/1/2018 268 Morrison, lames M 642 86 PARAMEDIC 520995 N/A 12/1/2018 268 Parrish, Kristopher, FTO PK4310 66 PARAMEDIC n' 527078 N/A 12/1/2018 268 Payne, Matthew 553 86 PARAMEDIC PMD526894 N/A 12/1/2018 268 Phillips, Lorne PL2870 86 PARAMEDIC PMD526896 N/A 12/1/2018 268 Reid, Sheila, Fro R54894 86 PARAMEDIC PMD 206971 N/A 12/1/2018 268 Reinhard, Rochelle 648 86 PARAMEDIC 11954 N/A 12/1/2018 268 Reuther, Matthew RM6S00 B6 PARAMEDIC PMD 520348 N/A 12/1/2018 268 Selph, Tanner 554 86 PARAMEDIC PMD 529068 N/A 12/1/2018 268 Sewell, Karen 664 86 PARAMEDIC PMD531926 N/A 12/1/2018 268 Skinner,John SJ5606 86 PARAMEDIC PMD519071 N/A 12/1/2018 268 Smith, JustinM 744 86 PARAMEDIC 502297 N/A 12/1/2018 268 Snead, Jasper 694 86 PARAMEDIC 525391 N/A 12/1/2018 268 Sparkman, Cody M 718 86 PARAMEDIC 532317 N/A 12/1/2018 268 i Subs, Gabriel SG1227 86 PARAMEDIC PMD 523404 N/A 12/1/2018 268 !� !Thomas, Kristen 714 86 PARAMEDIC PM0S32925 N/A 12/1/2018 268 �Thompson, Jacquelyn 820 86 PARAMEDIC 532450 N/A 12/1/2018 268 I Toth, Michael V i 505386 86 PARAMEDIC 531683 N/A 12/1/2018 268 Visser, Tjeerd VT8337 86 PARAMEDIC fK 14356 N/A 12/1/2018 268 Weatherly, Michael G i WM8770 86 PARAMEDIC !'q 527397 N/A 12/1/2018 268 i Williams, James D 622 86 PARAMEDIC 500409 N/A 12/1/2018 266 Page 1 of 1 72 Back httnc-//tznrnxJ Pnrn_nhiv .,.... -1 J0 /nn, n Employee Certification Status sok [.;a' 8 Employees Credential Reports s, Employee Certification Status 1 QueryType Show All Home Cost Center� -All - _ Certification Credential Type Driven License v -All- -� Status OutputFormat vl Acture V @Q J Q LFoJ O Q Query Driven License 1 All Driven License Certifications On Record 1/23/2019 321 French, Jeremy Employee Emp. 10 Cost tenter Certification View Number Effective Expires Days To Exp. Notes Ahmad -Khan, Robert, FTO AR6016 86 Driven License r" A532-777-73-221-0 N/A 6/21/2022 1566 Almanza, Linda - AL4693 86 Drivers License r�( A455.520.80.964-0 N/A 12/24/2020 1022 Alvarez, Jason i AJ5533 86 Drivers License r� A416-020.77.310-0 N/A 8/30/2018 175 i Anderson, Corey S AC2574 87 Driven License A536.118 -8"S8-0 N/A 12/18/2021 1381 Apollon, Sebastlen 793 85 Driven License i! A145794924070 N/A 11/7/2025 2801 i Bacela, Michael, FTO BM9003 86 Drivers License s7% 8240.540.8(I.126-0 N/A 4/6/2023 3855 i Baldwin, Christopher 697 85 Drivers License 843511397066.0 N/A 2/26/2021 1086 { Bernier, Edgar 678 86 Driven License 8656.210.78-208-0 N/A 6/6/2019 455 G455.553.9D-296.0 N/A 8/16/2025 2718 .% 797 85 Berube, Vanessa 739 85 Drivers License 1`Z 5610872816290 N/A 4/9/2019 397 j Blbbs, Harold 583 87 Driven License 0120356902110 N/A 6/11/2021 1191 Blbbs, Tua 578 84 Drivers License 8320817918430 N/A 6/23/2021 1203 V Bottoms, Erik BE0702 86 Driven License 8352-214.79442-0 N/A 12/2/2025 2826 i Brown, Jeffery L BJ0534 85 Driven License 8650432-70-335-0 N/A 9/15/2025 2748 Bruscla, Benjamin 822 85 Drivers License 8620063924270 N/A 11/27/2022 1725 Burgos, Javier 769 85 Driven License 8622433953900 N/A 10/30/2019 601 Camiel, Cory H 754 g5 Drivers License C540100923690 N/A 10/9/2022 1676 Canada, Pheonix J 779 88 Driven License 0530670671650 N/A 5/5/2022 1519 Caprie, Nicholas A 777 95 Drivers License CL60E21941330 tJ/A 4/13/2018 36 i Cardona, Paul 505603 85 Drivers License r, 0635691864570 N/A 4/9/2019 397 i Carreiro, Thomas M 760 86 Drivers License C660433.88-324-0 N/A 9/4/2024 2372 i Clanne, Junior 658 95 Driven License fv� C500-025-94-446-0 N/A 6/29/2018 113 i Con., John 794 g5 Drivers License C620472943120 N/A 8/31/2018 176 i Couch, Donald A 774 g5 Drivers License C200181930620 N/A 2/22/2022 1447 j Crespi, Alexander 1 596 86 Drivers License r:,� C621010943790 N/A 10/19/2018 225 j Defrfest, Michael J 613 85 Drivers License D162550924280 N/A 11/28/2022 1726 i Dennis, John DJ0934 88 Driven License D520473-80.175-0 N/A. 5/15/2020 799 i DeSouza, Michael DM5669 83 Drivers License D220.541.60-016-0 N/A 1/16/2019 314 j Dorado Mendez, Edurad. 907 85 Drivers License D635200920960 N/A 3/16/2023 1834 Downs, Alfred 813 87 Drivers License D520000520950 N/A 3/15/2025 2564 Non Medical Doyle, Christopher W DC0381 86 Drivers License r4 D400219880630 N/A 2/23/2019 352 Fairweather, Jerrel i 710 85 Driven License F636436950230 N/A 1/23/2019 321 French, Jeremy F13431 85 Drivers License F652.435.91-086-0 N/A 3/6/2021 1094 Fuller, April FA4285 85 Drivers License i F460012825490 N/A 2/8/2019 337 Fusco, Anthony 795 85Driven License F200010933810 N/A 10/21/2025 2784 Gardner, Robert S I 719 BS Drivers License i; G63S-777$9-299-0 N/A 8/19/2019 529 y Glacdo, Mike, FTO 708 95 Drivers License r),, G200.550-84-186-0 N/A 5/26/2019 444 Giles, Taryn C 817 94 Drivers License rye G42D-803.88.556-0 N/A 2/16/2021 1076 j Glennon, Matthew 785 9S Drivers License G455.553.9D-296.0 N/A 8/16/2025 2718 Glenton, Kyle 797 85 Drivers License 6453518953270 N/A 9/1/2019 548 Gobler, Brooks 695 85 Driven License f, G146-078.95-044-0 N/A 2/4/2019 333 Gonzalez III, Menace, FTO GM1882 83 Drivers License rvr 6524.55488-350-0 N/A 9/30/2018 206 I Gower, Tanner, FTO W 764 85 Drivers License G600819904530 N/A 12/13/2021 1376 Grivas, Kristina 607 86 Driven License G612.50483-503-0 N/A 1/3/2023 1762 Gutierrez, George 786 85 Orsvers Liccns= 6362.36592-21)1-0 N/A 6/1/2018 SS i Haggerty, Patrick HP9778 86 Driven License H263679842970 N/A 8/17/2018 162 i Hanzel, Curtis 1 787 85 Driven License H524110644120 N/A 11/12/2024 2441 Henderson, Mario HM4165 86 Drivers License H536551784300 N/A 11/30/2018 267 i Hodge, Austin 703 85 Omen Licence H.; 7C-312921370 4JA 4/17/2018 40 Hood, Ashley N 806 84 Drivers License H300014917691 N/A N/A N/A i Hord, Denise W HD2395 86 Drivers License H630-179-59-825-0 N/A 9/5/2025 2738 Horton, Mariana 655 86 Drivers License H635-552.93-708-0 N/A 6/8/2023 1918 !Humann, Sean M 825 168 Drivers License H550793883870 N/A 10/27/2025 2790 i Hunter, Christopher FTO HC9076 86 Drivers License :., H536-113-88-043-0 N/A 2/3/2026 2889 Jacques, John 8 791 87 Drivers License 1220462913380 N/A 9/9/2018 185 :Johnson, Michelle A 601 86 Driven License J525.541.88.869-0 N/A 10/9/2018 215 `'I Keller, Andrea PA7889 86 Drivers License X460-016-79.726-0 N/A 6/26/2022 1571 Page 1 of 2 73 Back h thrsc�//�s ns nsr or�rn_ .,t„n --- n In rnni n Employee Certification Status 'King, Adam 751 g5 Driven License K520010811780 N/A 5/1/2023 Ledingham, Sean 661 95 Drivers License L352798931260 N/A 4/6/2025 j Mace, John M13217 86 Drivers License M200476920540 N/A 2/24/2020 Machesko, Joseph 674 85 Drivers License M22DA92-93.175-0 N/A 5/15/2025 i Mangola, Jacob, FTO MF5761 85 Drivers License MS24.430.90-100-0 N/A 3/20/2022 Martian, Elijah R 826 168 Drivers License M63SZ16972490 N/A 7/29/2021 i � Masters, Daniel MD7546 86 Drivers License M236170903260 N/A 9/6/2020 Maurer, lake 824 g5 Driven LicenseT'� M660425962290 N/A 6/29/2020 Mcglothlin, LanceML6262 86 Drivers License M243530882240 N/A 6/24/2018 McKenney, Carl 001 Drivers License M250125742140 N/A 6/14/2020 Menardy, Franchesca 799 86 Drivers License M563254857090 N/A 6/8/2019 Miller, Katherine A 627 g5 Driven License M460501929500 N/A 9/30/2022 Morrison, James M 642 BG Drivers License M6Z5453901470 N/A 4/27/2019 Moynihan, Lindsey ML4075 85 Drivers License Fra MSSO.534.84.742-0 N/A 7/2/2020 Murray -Johnson, Kathlene m 830 85 Drivers License M62SS13926760 N/A S/16/2026 Nelslus, Sarah, FTO N57920 86 Drivers License N220.781-73-745-1 N/A 7/5/2021 Nocita, Kimberly A 621 85 Drivers License N230501937670 N/A 7/27/2021 t Ortiz, Jacob673 g5 Driven LicenseCz 0632-432.93-1350 N/A 4/15/2025 Parrish, Kristopher, FTO PK4310 86 Drivers Ucense f2; P620512874250 N/A 11/25/2025 Payne, Matthew 553 86 Drivers License P500558914060 N/A 11/6/2021 Phillips, Lome PL2870 86 Drivers License P412530898640 N/A 10/4/2021 Phillips, Vincent PV8512 BS Drivers License ! P412-878-86377-0 N/A 10/17/2025 Pieler, John 821 85 Drivers License P460476963770 N/A 10/17/2020 i Piloto, Christopher 6077 g5 Driven License P430-110-79-291-0 N/A 8/11/2021 ! Pother, Alexander goo g5 Drivers Ucense P220007970140 N/A 1/14/2021 Ramirez, Alejandro 828 168 Drivers License 8562000842060 N/A N/A N/A i Reid, Shells, FTO 854894 86 Driven License 8300.785-78-508-0 N/A 1/8/2021 Reinhard, Rochelle 648 86 Drivers License f 8563730666860 N/A 5/26/2025 Reinhold, Frederick RF1837 B8 Drivers License 8543-2S9SS-111-0 N/A 3/31/2019 Reuther, Matthew I RM6500 86 Drivers License 8360556900170 N/A 1/17/2020 IRuff,Cody got g5 Drivers License R100105970910 N/A 3/11/2021 i salvesen, John 578162 83 Drivers License 5412.470.54-012-0 1/27/2010 1/12/2019 Seipel, Ashley 815 85 Drivers License 5140012968620 N/A 10/2/2021 Selph, Tanner i 554 86 Driven License 5410815932960 N/A 8/16/2023 Sewell, Karen 664 86 Drivers License 5400-513-95.826-0 N/A 9/6/2019 Skinner, John 515606 86 Drivers License 5560464863050 N/A 8/25/2022 Smith, Justin M 744 86 Drivers License 5530433804270 N/A 11/27/2020 !Snead, Jasper 694 86 Drivers License S53D438-86-046-0 N/A 2/6/2019 —',Sparkman,.Cody-M_— ---7-18— —lis—Drivers License—A-5162-113-95-174-0—N/A--5/`14/2019-.-- Spinetta, Michael V 830 168 Drivers License 5353558970420 N/A 2/20/2020 1 j Suba, Gabriel SG1227 86 Driven Ucense 5100280862670 N/A 7/27/2025 i Thomas, Kristen 714 gG Driven Ucense T520.514-92-545-0 N/A N/A N/A Thompson, Jacquelyn 820 86 Drivers License 751 24 3 295 6850 N/A 5/25/2019 iTorres Ramirez, Alberto 788 85 Drivers License T626-014-95-296-0 N/A 7/25/2018 Toth, Michael V 505386 86 Drivers License 7300558640570 N/A 2/17/2026 iToussaint, Emmanuel C I 811 87 Drivers Ucense 7253203830420 N/A 2/2/2025 jTse, Tal-Tjingq 763 85 Drivers Ucense T200BL5953090 N/A 8/30/2019 i Vbser, Tjeenl i V78337 86 Driven License Lq V2G0300661740 N/A 5(14l201E Weatherly, Michael G WM8770 86 Drivers License .:a W364-547-70-189-0 N/A 5/29/2019 Whalen-Henik, Matthew 735 85 Drivers License W455546963300 N/A 9/10/2020 I Willlams, Corey I 804 85 Drivers License W452115894110 N/A 11!11/2022 i Williams, James 622 86 Drivers License W452444750611 N/A 2/21/2019 1 Young, Kevin T 831 168 Drivers License Y520SIS932640 N/A 7/24/2023 i Zita, Amanda L 561 64 Drivers Licence v0,'5712827050 H?A 6/5/2018 1880 2586 718 2625 1473 1239 913 844 108 829 457 1667 415 847 2991 1215 1237 2595 2819 1339 1306 2780 954 1252 1043 1037 2636 388 680 1099 310 1304 1987 547 1631 995 335 714 2698 443 139 2903 2523 Non -Medical S40 67 447 917 1709 350 1964 89 Page 2 of 2 74 I'++— //--, -- —1— fVDl~ 1) 10 11) A 1 0 Employee Certification Status * (g a Employee> Credential Reports> Employee Certification status Page 1 of 2 75 Back httnc•//unuw enro-nhic non 12/P/7!110 Query Type Certification Credential Type No Expiration Oate _—� vl EVOC V CertlRwtions V Home Cost Center Status Output Format -AII• v Acture V 0.0a 00. O;j Query EVOC Certifications Without Expiration Date - Certiflcatlonts !All Employee Emp. 10 Cost Center Certification View Number Effective Eaplres Days To Exp. Notes Ahmad -Khan, Robert, FTO AR6016 86 EVOC t 4/12/2002 N/A N/A Almanza, Linda AL4693 86 EVOC -q N/A N/A N/A AWarez,Jason A15533 86 EVOC !k N/A N/A N/A Apollon, Sebastian 793 85 EVOC 12/5/2014 N/A N/A 1 Bacelo, Michael, FTO BM9003 86 EVOC Cq N/A N/A N/A Baldwin, Christopher 697 85 EVOC N/A N/A N/A Bernier, Edgar 678 86 EVOC !; NIA N/A N/A iBerube, Van us 739 85 EVOC 4/17/2016 N/A N/A Bottoms, Erik0 SE0702 86 EVOC N/A N/A N/A Brown, lefferyL 810534 65 EVOC Frz N/A N/A N/A Bruscla, Benjamin 822 85 EVOC 1/19/2018 N/A N/A �8urgos, Javier 769 85 EVOC 12/22/2016 N/A N/A �Camlel, Cory H 754 85 EVOC 7/23/2016 N/A N/A, Caprin, Nicholas A 777 85 EVOC N/A N/A N/A Cardona, Paul 505603 85 EVOC N/A N/A N/A Carrelro, Thomas M 760 86 EVOC 11)7/2016 N/A N/A t' I Cianne, Junior 6.58 85 EVOC N/A N/A N/A ECorso,John 794 85 EVOC 5/16/2017 N/A N/A jE Couch, Donald A 774 85 EVOC N/A N/A N/A ` Crespi, Alexander J 596 86 EVOC P N/A N/A N/A DeFriest, Michael J 613 BS EVOC R N/A N/A N/A I Dennis, John DJO934 83 EVOC N/A N/A N/A 1 DeSouza, Michael OM5669 83 EVOC N/A N/A N/A jDorado Mendez, Edumdo 807 &5 EVOC 4/17/2016 N/A N/A Doyle, Christopher W 000381 86 EVOC N/A N/A N/A i; ;Fand, Megan R 775 86 EVOC S/12/2016 N/A N/A Fairweather, Jerrel 710 a5 EVOC N/A N/A N/A Does not have one In his file. French, Jeremy FJ3431 85 EVOC N/A N/A N/A i Fuller,April FA4295 85 EVOC rk N/A N/A N/A I I usm,Anthony _ _ _ _ 796 a5 EVOC 11/20/2015 N/A N/A Gardner, Robert S 719 85 EVOC N/A N/A N/A Giaato, Mike, FTO 708 85 EVOC N/A N/A N/A i Glennon, Matthew 785 85 EVOC 5/18/2016 N/A N/A I!Glenton, Kyle t 797 85 EVOC 5/25/2017 N/A N/A Gobier, Brooks 695 65 EVOC N/A N/A N/A Gonzalez ill, Manace, FTO GM1992 83 EVOC t N/A N/A N/A 'Gower, Tanner, FTO W 764 a5 EVOC 11/20/2016 N/A N/A j Gr(vas, Kristina 607 86 EVOCCYC 11/15/2014 N/A N/A Gutierrez, George 786 85 EVOC 2/26/2017 N/A N/A Haggerty, Patrick HP9778 86 EVOC N/A N/A N/A '.. Henderson, Mario HM4265 86 EVOC N/A N/A N/A '.. ;Hodge, Austin 703 85 EVOC 5/28/2014 N/A N/A .Hord, Denise W HD2395 86 EVOC N/A N/A N/A ;Horton, Mariana 655 86 EVOC 4/26/2015 N/A N/A 'Humann, Sean M 825 168 EVOC 11/22/2008 N/A N/A Hunter, Christopher FTO P HC9076 86 EVOC N/A N/A N/A 4acques, John B 791 87 EVOC N/A N/A N/A I `Johnson, Michelle A 601 86 EVOC 7/13/2013 N/A N/A Keller, Andrea PA7889 86 EVOC N/A N/A N/A King, Adam 1 751 85 EVOC 7/1/2016 N/A N/A Ledtngham, Sean 661 85 EVOC N/A N/A N/A 'Loewe, Sheri L 805 86 EVOC 8/10/2003 N/A N/A i Mace, John M13217 86 EVOC N/A N/A N/A 'Machesko, Joseph 674 BS EVOC N/A N/A N/A i Mangola, Jacob, FTO MF5761 85 EVOC N/A N/A N/A +Martian, Elijah R 826 168 EVOC 1/21/2018 N/A N/A Page 1 of 2 75 Back httnc•//unuw enro-nhic non 12/P/7!110 Employee Certification Status Masters, Daniel MD7546 86 EVOC N/A N/A N/A Maurer, Jake 824 85 EVOC is N/A N/A N/A McDermott, Thomas R 827 85 EVOC 2/27/2018 N/A N/A Mcglothlin, Lance ML6262 86 EVOC N/A N/A N/A McKenny, Carl 001 EVOC NIA N/A N/A Menardy, Fanchesca 799 86 EVOC 12/5/2004 N/A N/A Michel, Smithlin 816 85 EVOC 8/19/2017 NIA N/A Miller, Katherine A 627 85 EVOC 9/13/2014 N/A N/A Morrison, James M 642 86 EVOC 4/25/2009 N/A N/A Moynihan, Lindsey ML4075 85 EVOC C N/A N/A N/A Murray -Johnson, Kathlene m 810 85 EVOC 9/24/2017 N/A N/A Neislus, Sarah, FTO NS7920 86 EVOC N/A N/A N/A Nocita, Kimberly A 621 85 EVOC 11/10/2013 N/A. N/A Ortiz, Jacob 673 85 EVOC N/A N/A N/A Parrish, Kristopher, FTO PK4310 86 EVOC N/A N/A N/A Payne, Matthew 553 66 EVOC 4/28/2012 N/A NIA Phillips, Lome PL2870 86 EVOC N/A N/A N/A Phillips, Vincent PV8512 85 EVOC N/A N/A N/A Pleler, John 821 g5 EVOC S/16/2016 N/A N/A Piloto, Christopher 1 6077 85 EVOC N/A N/A N/A Poches, Alexander 800 85 EVOC 1/20/2017 N/A N/A Reid, Sheila, FTO RS4894 86 EVOC N/A N/A N/A Reinhard, Rochelle 648 86 EVOC k;; N/A N/A N/A Reuther, Matthew RM6500 86 EVOC N/A N/A N/A Ruff, Cody 802 85 EVOC 5/16/2017 N/A N/A Seipel, Ashley 815 85 EVOC 8/17/2017 N/A N/A Selph, Tanner 554 86 EVOC 11/3/2012 N/A N/A Sewell, Karen 664 86 EVOC N/A NIA N/A Skinner,John 515606 86 EVOC N/A NIA N/A Smith, Justin 744 86 EVOC 10/25/2000 N/A N/A Snead, Jasper 694 86 EVOC N/A N/A N/A Sparkman, Cody M 718 86 EVOC N/A N/A N/A Spinetta, Michael V 830 168 EVOC 8/1/2017 N/A N/A Suba, Gabriel SG1227 86 EVOC N/A N/A N/A Thomas, Kristen 714 86 EVOC 1/4/2016 NIA N/A Thompson, Jacquelyn 820 86 EVOC 4/15/2016 N/A N/A Torres Ramirez, Alberto 788 85 EVOC 3/24/2017 N/A N/A, Toth, Michael 505386 86 EVOC N/A N/A N/A Tse Talring.Q----763--85EVOC—_------6/17/2016—N/A—N/A. Visser, TJeerd VT8337 86 EVOC C;i N/A N/A N/A Weatherly, Michael G WM9770 86 EVOC f N/A N/A N/A Whalen-Henik, Matthew 735 85 EVOC 6/16/2016 N/A N/A Williams, Corey 804 85 EVOC 7/23/2016 N/A N/A Young, Kevin T 831 168 EVOC 4/26/2015 NIA N/A Page 2 of 2 76 ---- »J., 110 /11111 0 Employee Gerd-fication Status Page 1 of 1 3,x[1; 8 Employee > Credential Reports > Employee Certification Status Bac Query Type Certf kation Credential Type r5howAll vi Drivers License VI -Ap- HomeCostCenter � status Output Format 87 - Non -Medical 5tatf r' Y1 AdFre v 0 Q p'D 0 I Query All Drivers License Certifications On Record In Cost tenter 87 'Employee Emp.ID Cut CenterCertiffcatlon View Number Effective Expires Days To Exp. Notes Anderson, Corey AC2574 87 Drivers License- A536.118.86.458-0 N/A 12/18/2021 1381 Gibbs, Harold 583 87 Drivers License 8120356902110 N/A 6/11/2021 mi Downs, Alfred 813 87 Drivers License D520000520950 N/A 3/15/2025 - 7564 Non -Medical Jacques, John B 791 87 Drivers License 1220462913380 N/A 9/9/2018 185 Toussaint, Emmanuel C all g7 - Drivers License T253203930420 N/A 2/2/2025 2523 Nan -Medical Published Rates 2017 All County Ambulance Base Rate Mileage Rural Mileage Waiting Time Per 1/2 Hr ALS Non -E $517.00 10.51 BLS Non -E $285.00 10.51 SCT $900.00 10.51 Waiting Time First 30 min Free Non -Medical Stretcher $100.00 $4.50 Wheelchair Service $70.00 $3.50 Ambulatory Service $40.00 $2.00 $30.00 79 PAS q.FpINDIAN RIVER COUNTY CLASS "B" �T CERTIFICATE OF PUBLIC CONVENIENCE AND NECESSITY WHEREAS, Falck Southeast II Corp., DBA American Ambulance Service has requested, authorization to provide interfacility ambulance medical transportation originating within Indian River County; and,. WHEREAS, the above named service affirms that it will maintain compliance with the requirements of the Indian River County Code of Ordinances Chapter 304, Life Support and Wheelchair Services. THEREFORE, the Indian River County Board of County Commissioners hereby issue a Class "E" & Class "B" Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity to said, Company to provide Wheelchair/Stretcher and Interfacility Ambulance Medical Transportation Services. Certificate Type: CLASS B Date of Expiration: March 27,.2020 (Unless certificate is sooner revoked or suspended.) Li"mitations: Interfacility. Ambulance. Medical Transportation Services.Only Approved by the Indian River County Board of County, Commissioners on March 20, 2018 J z. Effective Date: March 27, 2018 ��t?Itt�ti� Peter D. O'Bryan, Chairman Board of County Commissioners INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA MEMORANDUM TO: Jason E. Brown; County Administrator THROUGH: Stan Boling, AICP; Community Development Director Phillip J. Matson, AICP; MPO Staff Director FROM: Brian Freeman, AICP; Senior Transportation Planner DATE: March 9, 2018 SUBJECT: Approval of a Public Transportation Supplemental Joint Participation Agreement (SJPA) with the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) ,to Continue Bus Service to the Indian River State College Main Campus (Fort Pierce) It is requested that the information herein presented be given formal consideration by the Board of County Commissioners at its regular meeting of March 20, 2018. DESCRIPTION & CONDITIONS For the past several years, the county has applied for and received transit operating assistance under the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) Corridor Grant program. These grant funds have been passed through to the Senior Resource Association (SRA), Indian River County's transit service provider. FDOT Corridor Grant funds may be used for improving transit operations, such as realigning routes or increasing coverage areas. On May 22, 2014, the county was approved for an FDOT Corridor Grant which provided funding for hourly intercounty transit service to the Indian River State College (IRSC) Main Campus in Fort Pierce. This service is provided through GoLine Route 15, which connects with three other GoLine routes (Routes 4, 6, and 7) at the Intergenerational Center. With a simple transfer, riders coming from the IRSC Mueller Campus, the Main Transit Hub, the Indian River Mall, Vero Beach Highlands, and other locations may travel to the IRSC Main Campus in Fort Pierce. Through this grant, intercounty transit service to St. Lucie County is 100% funded by FDOT with no local contribution. The grant covers a five year period that lasts until April 30, 2019. Through the first four years of this grant, FDOT has provided $401,549 in funding for the intercounty transit service. At this time, FDOT is allocating an additional $99,750 to the county for the fifth year of the grant. In order to receive these funds, the BCC must enter into a Supplemental Joint Participation Agreement (SJPA) with FDOT, a copy of which is attached to this staff report (Attachment #2). C:\Users\legistar\AppData\Local\Temp\BCL Technologies\easyPDF 8\@BCL@D80D6D7A\@BCL@D80D6D7A.docx 81 ANALYSIS The attached resolution (Attachment #1) authorizes the Chairman to execute the SJPA for Corridor Grant funds. Upon the Board's adoption of the resolution and the Chairman's execution of the SJPA, MPO staff will transmit the SJPA to FDOT. As with the FTA Section 5307 grant program, only public agencies may be designated recipients of state Corridor Grant funds. With respect to the Corridor Grant program, the county receives the grant funds and transfers those funds to the county's Community Transportation Coordinator and transit provider, the Senior Resource Association (SRA). The SRA, in turn, provides the service as directed by the county and as identified in the SJPA. In this case, the funds are to be used to provide intercounty service to the IRSC Main Campus in St. Lucie County. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners approve the attached Public Transportation Supplemental Joint Participation Agreement and adopt the attached resolution authorizing the Chairman to sign the agreement. ATTACHMENTS 1. Authorizing Resolution for the Execution of a Public Transportation Supplemental Joint Participation Agreement 2. FDOT Public Transportation Supplemental Joint Participation Agreement 3. Grant Budget Form C:\Users\legistar\AppData\Local\Temp\BCL Technologies\easyPDF 8\@BCL@D80D6D7A\@BCL@D80D6D7A.docx 82 RESOLUTION NO. 2018 - A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF A PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION SUPPLEMENTAL JOINT PARTICIPATION AGREEMENT WITH THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION. WHEREAS, Indian River County has applied for and been allocated state mass transit operating assistance under FDOT Procedure number 725-030-003-e, also known as the Transit Corridor Grant Program; and WHEREAS, Indian River County, as the designated recipient of federal and state public transportation funding, must be the recipient of those funds on behalf of the Indian River County — Senior Resource Association; and WHEREAS, Indian River County is eligible to receive grant funding under Section 341.052(1), Florida Statutes, and under 49 USC Ch. 53, Section 5307 and 49 USC 1614; and WHEREAS, the Florida Department of Transportation provides Transit Corridor Grant funds to Indian River County to assist in the continuance and expansion of local public transportation services. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE INDIAN RIVER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS: That the Chairman of the Indian River County Board of County Commissioners is authorized to execute a public transportation Supplemental Joint Participation Agreement with the Florida Department of Transportation to obtain $99,750 in FY 2017/18 state Transit Corridor Grant funds for operating assistance as part of the County's ongoing public transportation service. 2. That the Indian River County Community Development Director is authorized to furnish such additional information as the Florida Department of Transportation may require in connection with the County's Transit Corridor Grant. THIS RESOLUTION. was moved for adoption by , and the motion was seconded by , and, upon being put to a vote, the vote was as follows: Chairman Peter D. O'Bryan Vice -Chairman Bob Solari Commissioner Susan Adams Commissioner Joseph E. Flescher Commissioner Tim Zorc C:\Users\legistar\AppData\Local\Temp\BCL Technologies\easyPDF 8\@BCL@D80D97B4\@BCL@D80D97B4.docx Page 1 o83 RESOLUTION NO. 2018 - The Chairperson thereupon declared the resolution duly passed and adopted this 20th day of March , 2018. BOARD OF COUNTY CONMUSSIONERS INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA By: Peter D. O'Bryan, Chairman Attest: Jeffrey R. Smith, Clerk of Court and Comptroller By: Deputy Clerk I HEREBY CERTIFY that on this day, before me, an officer duly authorized in this State and County to take acknowledgments, personally appeared Peter D. O'Bryan, as Chairman of the Board of County Commissioners, and , as Deputy Clerk, to me known to be the persons described in and who executed the foregoing instrument and they acknowledged before me that they executed the same. WITNESS my hand and official seal in the County and State last aforesaid this 20th day of March , 2018. APPROVED AS TO LEGAL SUFFICIENCY :• Dylan Reingold, County Attorney Notary Public SEAL: APPROVED AS TO COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT MATTERS Stan Boling, AICP, Director Community Development Department C:\Users\legistar\AppData\Local\Temp\BCL Technologies\easyPDF 8\@BCL@D80D97B4\@BCL@D80D97B4.docx Page 2 o$4 STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 725-030-07 PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION snt SUPPLEMENTAL JOINT PARTICIPATION AGREEMENT Page t of Number 2 Financial Project No.: Fund: DPTO FLAIR Approp.: 088774 435846-1-84-01 Function: 215 FLAIR Obj.: 751000 (item -segment -phase -sequence) Federal No.: Org. Code: 55042010429 Contract No.: ARE86 DUNS No.: 80-939-7102 Vendor No.: VF596000674029 CFDA Number: CSFA Number: 55.013 THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this day of by and between the STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, an agency of the State of Florida, hereinafter referred to as the Department, and Indian River County Board of County Commissioners 1801 27th Street Vero Beach, FL 32960 hereinafter referred to as Agency. WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, the Department and the Agency heretofore on the 22 nd day of May , 2014 entered into a Joint Participation Agreement; and WHEREAS, the Agency desires to accomplish certain project items as outlined in the Attachment "A" appended hereto; and WHEREAS, the Department desires to participate in all eligible items for this project as outlined in Attachment "A" for a total Department Share of $ 501.299.00 NOW, THEREFORE THIS INDENTURE WITNESSETH: that for and in consideration of the mutual benefits to flow from each to the other, the parties hereto agree that the above described Joint Participation Agreement is to be amended and supplemented as follows: 1.00 Project Description: The project description is amended Supplemental operating funds for Indian River County/St. Lucie County Transit Service (Southeast Regional Transit Corridor) 85 725-030-07 PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION 6/77 Page 2 of 3 2.00 Project Cost: Paragraph 3.00 of said Agreement is • increased O decreased by $ 99,750.00 bringing the revised total cost of the project to $ 501,299.00 Paragraph 4.00 of said Agreement is • increased O decreased by $ 99.750.00 bringing the Department's revised total cost of the project to $ 501,299.00 3.00 Amended Exhibits: Exhibit(s) B & D of said Agreement is amended by Attachment "A". 4.00 Contract Time: Paragraph 16.00 of said Agreement 4/30/2019 5.00 E -Verify: Vendors/Contractors: 1. shall utilize the U.S. Department of Homeland Security's E -Verify system to verify the employment eligibility of all new employees hired by the Vendor/Contractor during the term of the contract; and 2. shall expressly require any subcontractors performing work or providing services pursuant to the state contract to likewise utilize the U.S. Department of Homeland Security's E -Verify system to verify the employment eligibility of all new employees hired by the subcontractor during the contract term. 0 725-030-07 PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION 6/11 Page 3 of 3 Financial Project No. 435846-1-84-01 Contract No. ARE86 Agreement Date Except as hereby modified, amended or changed, all other terms of said Agreement dated 5/22/2014 and any subsequent supplements shall remain in full force and effect. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused these presents to be executed, the day and year first above written. AGENCY AGENCY NAME SIGNATORY (PRINTED OR TYPED) SIGNATURE TITLE FDOT See attached Encumbrance Form for date of Funding Approval by Comptroller LEGAL REVIEW DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Mark Plass DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Acting Director of Transportation Development TITLE 87 Financial Project No. 435846-1-84-01 Contract No. ARE86 Agreement Date ATTACHMENT "A" SUPPLEMENTAL JOINT PARTICIPATION AGREEMENT This Attachment forms an integral part of that certain Supplemental Joint Participation Agreement between the State of Florida, Department of Transportation and Indian River County Board of County Commissioners 1801 27th Street Vero Beach, FL 32960 Dated 22nd May, 2014 DESCRIPTION OF SUPPLEMENT (Include justification for cost change): supplemental funding for operating inter -county transit route Comments: 88 Page 1 of 2 As Approved As Amended Net Change Project Cost $401,549.00 $501,299.00 $99,750.00 As Approved As Amended Net I. Fund DDR,DPTO DDR,DPTO DDR,DPTO Department: $401,549.00 $501,299.00 $99,750.00 Agency: $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 Federal: $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 Total Project Cost $401,549.00 $501,299.00 $99,750.00 Comments: 88 Page 1 of 2 ATTACHMENT "A" SUPPLEMENTAL JOINT PARTICIPATION AGREEMENT II. MULTI-YEAR OR PREQUALIFIED PROJECT FUNDING If a project is a multi-year or prequalified project subject to paragraphs 4.10 and 17.20 of this agreement, funds are programmed in the Department's Work program in the following fiscal year(s): FY Amount 2013 $206,006.00 2015 $195,543.00 2017 $99,750.00 89 Page 2 of 2 Financial Project No. 435846-1-84-01 Contract No. ARE86 Agreement Date EXHIBIT "D" STATE FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE (FLORIDA SINGLE AUDIT ACT) THE STATE RESOURCES AWARDED PURSUANT TO THIS AGREEMENT CONSIST OF THE FOLLOWING: SUBJECT TO SECTION 215.97, FLORIDA STATUTES: Awarding Agency: Florida Department of Transportation State Project Title: TRANSIT CORRIDOR PROGRAM CSFA Number: 55.013 *Award Amount: $501,299.00 *The state award amount may change with supplemental agreements Specific project information for CSFA Number 55.013 is provided at: https://apps.fldfs.com/fsaa/searchCatalog.aspx COMPLIANCE REQUIREMENTS APPLICABLE TO STATE RESOURCES AWARDED PURSUANT TO THIS AGREEMENT: State Project Compliance Requirements for CSFA Number 55.013 are provided at: https://apps.fldfs.com/fsaa/searchCompliance.aspx The State Projects Compliance Supplement is provided at: https://apps.fldfs.com/fsaa/compliance.aspx 90 Page 1 of 1 GRANT NAME: FDOT Transit Corridor Grant GRANT #: ARE86 AMOUNT OF GRANT: $99,750 DEPARTMENT RECEIVING GRANT: Community Development (pass through to Senior Resource Association) CONTACT PERSON: Phillip J. Matson PHONE #: (772) 226-1455 1. How long is the grant for? Five Years Starting Date: MU 22, 2014 2. Does the grant require you to fund this function after the grant is over? Yes X No 3. Does the grant require a match? Yes X No If yes, does the grant allow the match to be In Kind Services? Yes No 4. Percentage of grant to match: N/A % 012.12 5. Grant match amount required: " 012.13 6. Where are the matching funds coming from (i.e. In Kind Services, Reserve for Contingency? 012.14 N/A 012.17 7. Does the grant cover capital costs or start-up costs? X Yes No If no, how much do you think will be needed in capital costs or start-up costs? $ (Attach a detailed listing of costs.) Fourth Year 8. Are you adding any additional positions utilizing the grant funds? Yes X No If yes, please list. (If additional space is needed, please attach a schedule.) $ Acct. Description Position Position Position Position Position 011.12 Regular Salaries 011.13 Other Salaries & Wages (PT) 012.11 Social Security 012.12 Retirement Contributions 012.13 Life and Health Insurance 012.14 Worker's Compensation 012.17 Soc. Sec. Medicare Matching $ TOTAL 9. What is the total cost of each position including benefits, capital, start-up, auto expense, travel, and operating? Salaries and Benefits Operating Costs Capital Total Costs 10. What is the estimated cost of the grant to the County over five years? $0 91 Grant Amount Other Matching Costs Match Total First Year $99,750 $ $ $99,750 Second Year $ $ $ $ Third Year $ $ $ $ Fourth Year $ $ $ $ Fifth Year $ $ $ $ 91 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF UTILITY SERVICES Date: March 13, 2018 To: Jason E. Brown, County Administrator From: Vincent Burke, P.E., Director of Utility Services Prepared By: Cindy Corrente, Utilities Finance Manager Subject: Change Order No. 1—Comprehensive Water, Wastewater, and Reclaimed (Reuse) Water Rate Study, and Water and Sewer Impact Fee Study DESCRIPTIONS AND CONDITIONS: On July 18, 2017, the Indian River County Board of County Commissioners (BCC) approved award of two Professional Services Agreements between Indian River County Department of Utility Services (IRCDUS) and Raftelis Financial Consultants, Inca (Raftelis) for a Comprehensive Water, Wastewater and Reclaimed Water Rate Study and for a Water and Wastewater Impact Fee Study. ANALYSIS: Staff has been working with the consultant and recently had a working session to review the work products to date. However, due to the difficulty surrounding data acquisition and data verification from the IRCDUS billing software, the consultant ran into some delays during the early part of the projects. Much of the data was stored in multiple data tables leading to difficulty in getting the data needed for the study. Even after the data was extracted, the consultant and staff needed to review and verify the results. Unfortunately, this process led to a delay in getting detailed data on which the consultant needed to base their review. Therefore, at this time, the consultant has requested a time extension of one hundred and fifty (150) days, bringing the estimated date for completion to June 20, 2018. FUNDING: There is no cost to the department as a result of this time extension. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the approval of Change Order No. 1 to the Professional Services Agreement with Raftelis Financial Consultants, Inc., for a Comprehensive Water, Wastewater, and Reclaimed Water Rate Study and Change Order No. 1 to the Professional Services Agreement with Raftelis Financial Consultants, Inc., for a Water and Wastewater Impact Fee Study, extending the completion due dates to June 20, 2018. ATTACHMENT(s): 1. Change Order No. 1 to the Comprehensive Water, Wastewater, and Reclaimed Water Rate Study 2. Change Order No. 1 to the Water and Wastewater Impact Fee Study 92 qR A F*TE-L IS March 12, 2018 Mr. Vincent M. Burke, PE Director Indian River County Utility Services 180127 th Street Vero Beach, FL 32960 Subject: Change Order No. 1 Dear Mr. Burke: In accordance with Section II of Attachment A to the Professional Services Agreement Between Indian River County, Florida and Raftelis Financial Consultants, Inc., for a Comprehensive Water, Wastewater and Reclaimed Water Rate Study, dated July 18, 2017, and pursuant to circumstances beyond the control of the Consultant, this Change Order No. I is to provide an adjustment of an additional one hundred and fifty (150) days to the Time of Performance. The return of one signed copy of this Change Order No. 1 shall serve as Approval for the extension of the Time of Performance to Additional Services. Raftelis Financial Consultants, Inc. Signature Principal Consultant Title March 12, 2018 Date 9S0 S. Winter Park Or., Suite 240 Casselberry, FE 32707 407 9601806 www.raftelis.com 13y: Indian River County, Florida Signature Title Date 93 RR A FT'E,L IS March 12, 2018 Mr. Vincent M. Burke, PE Director Indian River County Utility Services 1801 27"' Street Vero Beach, FL 32960 Subject: Change,Order No. 1 Dear Mr. Burke: In accordance with Section II of Attachment A to the Professional Services Agreement Between Indian River County, Florida and Raftelis Financial Consultants, Inc., for A Water and Wastewater Impact Fee Study, dated July 18, 2017, and pursuant to circumstances beyond the control of the Consultant, this Change Order No. 1 is to provide an adjustment of an additional one hundred and fifty (150) days to the Time of Performance. The return of one signed copy of this Change Order No. I shall serve as Approval for the extension of the Time of Performance to Additional Services. Raftelis Financial Consultants, Inc. Signature Principal Consultant Title March 12, 2018 Date 950 S. Winter Park Dr., Suite 240 Casselberry, F! 32707 407 960 1806 www.ra(telis.com By: Indian River County, Florida Signature Title Date 94 MOM Consent Agenda Indian River County Interoffice Memorandum Office of Management & Budget To: Members of the Board of County Commissioners From: Michael Smykowski Director, Office of Management & Budget Date: March 13, 2018 Subject: Miscellaneous Budget Amendment 009 Description and Conditions The Sheriffs Office and the Brackett Library are in need of emergency chiller replacements. Exhibit "A" appropriates funding in the amount of $300,000 from Optional Sales Tax/Cash Forward Oct 1St 2. During the economic downturn, the County scaled back on Road & Bridge personnel, equipment purchases and maintenance activities as part of an effort to combat the reduction in revenue. Public Works is now requesting to purchase the necessary equipment needed for a full-time drainage maintenance crew. This crew will be tasked with the cleaning of roadside swales/ditches year round and includes a rubber tire excavator ($230,077), dump truck ($151,053), and one crew cab pickup truck ($25,499) totaling $406,629. Exhibit "A" appropriates these funds from Transportation Fund/Cash Forward Oct 1St 3. It has become necessary to "roll-over' prior year funds into the current year budget. Exhibit "A" appropriates funding from General Fund/Cash Forward Oct 1St in the amount of $953,716, and $24,836 from Optional Sales Tax/Cash Forward Oct 1St 4. Two position reclassifications have been approved within the Office of Management & Budget. Exhibit "A" appropriates funding from General Fund/Reserve for Contingency in the amount of $8,948. 5. Due to the recent implementation of GASB 75, the previously approved $9 million advanced OPEB funding is being reclassified as a current expense rather than a prepaid expense. Exhibit "A" appropriates this funding from the previously allocated fund balance in Employee Health Fund/Cash Forward Oct 1St 6. On March 6, 2018 the Board of County Commissioners approved an increase to the existing Local Agency Program (LAP) agreement for Indian River Boulevard Sidewalk from 37th Street to 53rd Street in the amount of $62,116. Exhibit "A" appropriates these additional grant funds. 7. On March 6, 2018 the Board of County Commissioners approved Award of RFP 2018018 — Custodial Services for County Buildings. Exhibit "A" appropriates funding in the amount of $53,756 for these services from General Fund/Reserve for Contingency. 95 Board of County Commissioners March 13, 2018 Page 2of2 8. On January 16, 2018 the Board of County Commissioners approved funding an overlap of up to two months for the Emergency Services Director at a cost not to exceed $30,000, and authorized payment for 20 additional days of accrued vacation leave balance exceeding the maximum vacation leave allowed to be paid. The total overlap cost is $22,690 while the vacation leave expense totals $12,725. Exhibit "A" appropriates funding totaling $35,415 for these expenditures to be funded from General Fund/Reserve for Contingency. 9. The Utilities Department is requesting a budget amendment for $74,000 of additional overtime to be allocated to Water Distribution in order to fully fund the historical overtime amounts used in non-stop operation. Exhibit "A" appropriates funding of $87,691 (including benefits) from Utilities/Cash Forward Oct 1St Staff Recommendation Staff recommends the Board of County Commissioners approve the budget resolution amending the fiscal year 2017-2018 budget. Ml RESOLUTION NO. 2018- A RESOLUTION OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AMENDING THE FISCAL YEAR 2017-2018 BUDGET. WHEREAS, certain appropriation and expenditure amendments to the adopted Fiscal Year 2017-2018 Budget are to be made by resolution pursuant to section 129.06(2), Florida Statutes; and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County desires to amend the fiscal year 2017-2018 budget, as more specifically set forth in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and by this reference made a part hereof, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that the Fiscal Year 2017-2018 Budget be and hereby is amended as set forth in Exhibit "A" upon adoption of this Resolution. This Resolution was moved for adoption by Commissioner , and the motion was seconded by Commissioner , and, upon being put to a vote, the vote was as follows: Chairman Peter D. O'Bryan Vice Chairman Bob Solari Commissioner Susan Adams Commissioner Joseph E. Flescher Commissioner Tim Zorc The Chairman thereupon declared this Resolution duly passed and adopted this day of , 2018. Attest: Jeffrey R. Smith Clerk of Court and Comptroller Deputy Clerk INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA Board of County Commissioners Peter D. O'Bryan, Chairman APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGAL SUFFICIENCY BY COUNTY ATT NEY Exhibit "A" Resolution No. 2018 - Budget Office Approval: Budget Amendment: 009 Michael Smykowski, Budget Director Entry Number Fund/ Department/Account Name Account Number Increase Decrease 1. Revenue Optional Sales Tax/Cash Forward Oct 1st 315039-389040 $300,000 $0 Expense Optional Sales Tax/Facilities Management/Sheriffs Dept 31522019-066510-18020 $150,000 $0 A/C Chiller System Optional Sales Tax/Facilities Management/Brackett Library 31522019-066510-18021 $150,000 $0 A/C Chiller System 2. Revenue Transportation Fund/Cash Forward Oct 1st 111039-389040 $406,629 $0 Expense Transportation Fund/Road & Bridge/Automotive 11121441-066420 $176,552 $0 Transportation Fund/Road & Bridge/Other Machinery & 11121441-066490 $230,077 $0 Equipment 3. Revenue General Fund/Cash Forward Oct 1st 001039-389040 $953,716 $0 Optional Sales Tax/Cash Forward Oct 1st 315039-389040 $24,836 $0 Expense General Fund/Agencies/EDP Equipment/Senior 00111041-066470-54001 $1,908 $0 Resources Association General Fund/Agencies/Other Machinery & 00111041-066490-54001 $922,334 $0 Equipment/Senior Resources Association General Fund/Agencies/SRA Bus Shelters/Senior 00111041-066510-54001 $29,474 $0 Resources Association Optional Sales Tax/Parks/Sporting Clays Course 31521072-066510-12001 $24,836 $0 4. Expense General Fund/Reserves/Reserve for Contingency 00119981-099910 $0 $8,948 General Fund/Office of Management & Budget/Regular Salaries 00122913-011120 $7,731 $0 General Fund/Office of Management & Budget/Social 00122913-012110 $480 $0 Security Matching General Fund/Office of Management & Budget/Retirement 00122913-012120 $612 $0 General Fund/Office of Management & Budget/Worker's Compensation 00122913-012140 $12 $0 General Fund/Office of Management & Budget/Medicare Matching 00122913-012170 $113 $0 5. Revenue Employee Health/Non-Revenue/Cash Forward Oct 1st 504039-389040 $9,000,000 $0 1 of 2 Resolution No. 2018 - Budget Office Approval: Exhibit "A" Michael Smykowski, Budget Director Budget Amendment: 009 Entry Number Fund/ Department/Account Name Account Number Increase Decrease Expense Employee Health/OPEB Expense 50412719-012160 $9,000,000 $0 6. Revenue Optional Sales Tax/Federal Transportation Grants/IR Blvd Sidewalk 37th St to 53rd St 315033-331400-16025 $62,116 $0 Expense Optional Sales Tax/Road & Bridge/IR Blvd Sidewalk 37th St to 53rd St 31521441-066510-16025 $62,116 $0 7. Expense General Fund/Reserves/Reserve for Contingency 00119981-099910 $0 $53,756 General Fund/Facilities Management/Other Contractual Services 00122019-033490 $53,756 $0 8. Expense General Fund/Reserves/Reserve for Contingency 00119981-099910 $0 $35,415 General Fund/Emergency Management/Regular Salaries 00120825-011120 $30,077 $0 General Fund/Emergency Management/Social Security Matching 00120825-012110 $1,865 $0 General Fund/Emergency Management/Retirement 00120825-012120 $2,942 $0 General Fund/Emergency Management/Insurance-Health & Life 00120825-012130 $48 $0 General Fund/Emergency Management/Worker's Compensation 00120825-012140 $46 $0 General Fund/Emergency Management/Medicare Matching 00120825-012170 $437 $0 9. Revenue Utilities/Non-Revenue/Cash Forward Oct 1st 471039-389040 $87,691 $0 Expense Utilities/Water Distribution/Overtime 47126936-011140 $74,000 $0 Utilities/Water Distribution/Social Security Matching 47126936-012110 $4,588 $0 Utilities/Water Distribution/Retirement 47126936-012120 $5,854 $0 Utilities/Water Distribution/Worker's Compensation 47126936-012140 $2,176 $0 Utilities/Water Distribution/MedicareMatching 47126936-012170 $1,073 $0 99 2of2 CONSENT INDIAN RIVER COUNTY OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET PURCHASING DIVISION DATE: March 12, 2018 TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS THROUGH: Jason E. Brown, County Administrator Mike Smykowski, Director, Office of Management and Budget FROM: Jennifer Hyde, Purchasing Manager SUBJECT: Final Ranking of Contractors and Recommendation of Award of RFP 20018016 — Ansin Riverfront Conservation Area Boardwalks BACKGROUND: On behalf of the Parks Division, Requests for Proposals (RFPs) were solicited for final design and construction of a pedestrian boardwalk to cross a small tributary in the Conservation Area located northeast of the intersection of CR 510 and CR 512 in Sebastian. The County has obtained a General Permit for construction from the St. Johns Water Management District (GP #148619-2). RFP RESULTS: Advertising Date: December 6, 2017 RFP Opening Date: January 9, 2018 DemandStar Broadcast to: 483 Subscribers RFP Documents Requested by: 30 Firms Replies: 4 Firms ANALYSIS: A selection committee comprised of Beth Powell, Conservation Lands Manager, Wendy Swindell, Conservation Lands Technician and Steven Hitt, Senior Environmental Planner independently evaluated and scored the received proposals in accordance with the Purchasing Manual. These scores were compiled by the committee and an overall initial ranking of firms developed. The top two ranked firms were asked to provide their best and final offers (BAFO). After receipt of the BAFOs, the committee independently reviewed and ranked them, and met again to develop the final ranking of firms. The final ranking established by the committee is: 100 Proposing Firm Location 1. Summerlin's Marine Construction Fort Pierce 2. Indian River Docks, LLC Sebastian 3. Close Construction, LLC Okeechobee 4. Underwater Engineering Services, Inc. (UESI) TFort Pierce 100 CONSENT The committee's rankings are shown below. FUNDING: Anticipated project cost was expected to be in the range of $25,000-$35,000. The price proposal from Summerlin's Marine Construction is $29,282.40. Funding in that amount is available in the Optional Sales Tax/Parks/Construction Program/Conservation Area Improvements account 31521072-066510-17022. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Board approve the committee's final ranking of firms, award the work to Summerlin's Marine Construction and authorize the Purchasing Division to issue a Purchase Order for the work. 101 c O ti Y Ir U O L N C L � N C •(U U d H = E N Committee Memberc j SH 3 1 2 4 BP 4 2 1 3 WS 3 1 2 4 Initial Rank 3 1 2 4 Final Ranking after Review of BAFOs SH 2 1 BP 2 1 WS 2 1 Final Rank 3 2 1 4 FUNDING: Anticipated project cost was expected to be in the range of $25,000-$35,000. The price proposal from Summerlin's Marine Construction is $29,282.40. Funding in that amount is available in the Optional Sales Tax/Parks/Construction Program/Conservation Area Improvements account 31521072-066510-17022. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Board approve the committee's final ranking of firms, award the work to Summerlin's Marine Construction and authorize the Purchasing Division to issue a Purchase Order for the work. 101 CONSENT INDIAN RIVER COUNTY OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET PURCHASING DIVISION DATE: March 12, 2018 TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS THROUGH: Jason E. Brown, County Administrator Mike Smykowski, Budget Director FROM: Jennifer Hyde, Purchasing Manager SUBJECT: Award of Annual Bid for Day Labor (Rebid) — Bid 2018035 BACKGROUND: The Road and Bridge Division requested the solicitation of annual bids to establish firm fixed pricing for day laborers. Workers are used on an as -needed basis as flaggers, to perform mowing, and to perform other general labor activities. The contract will also be utilized by the Department of Utilities Services and the Parks Maintenance, Facilities Management and Traffic Engineering Divisions. The bid had previously been advertised, with only one responsive bid received. That bidder requested to withdraw its bid after noting an error on its bid form, and on January 9, 2018 the Board approved that withdrawal and authorized staff to rebid. The Board also authorized the Purchasing Division to issue the previous awardee, PeopleReady, a Purchase Order up to $100,000 to cover the period until award of the new bid is made. BID RESULTS: Advertising Date: January 14, 2018 Bid Opening Date: February 6, 2018 Demandstar Broadcast to: 52 Subscribers Specifications/Plans Downloaded by: 8 Vendors Replies: 4 Vendors 102 FDOT-MOT Total Total General Certified Estimated Bidder's Name Servicing Branch Labor Flagger Annual Estimated Annual Location Hourly Labor General Labor Rate Hourly Cost (38,600 Fl Cost Rate hr est.) h (4,220000 hr est.) A & Associates West Palm Beach $12.60 $12.60 $486,360.00 $52,920.00 Gomez Brothers Vero Beach $15.00 $16.00 $579,000.00 $67,200.00 LF Staffing Vero Beach $13.50 NB $521,100.00 NB PeopleReady Florida, Inc. Fort Pierce $12.29 $12.29 $474,394.00 $51,618.00 102 CONSENT ANALYSIS: The hourly rates bid by PeopleReady are equal to the current rates. Road and Bridge spent $414,647.13 on day labor services in FY 2016/2017 and estimates their need for the remaining portion of FY 17-18 is $200,000.00. FUNDING: Funding for the bulk of the work will come from the Road and Bridge Other Contractual Services account, 11121441-033490. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Board award Bid 2018.035 to PeopleReady Florida, Inc. Staff further recommends the Board approve the sample agreement and authorize the Chairman to execute it after review and approval by the County Attorney as to form and legal sufficiency and after the required certificates of insurance have been received and approved by the Risk Manager. Attachment: Sample Agreement 103 Agreement THIS AGREEMENT is by and between INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, a Political Subdivision of the State of Florida organized and existing under the Laws of the State of Florida, (hereinafter called OWNER) and PeopleReady of .Florida, Inc. (hereinafter called CONTRACTOR). OWNER and CONTRACTOR, in consideration of the mutual covenants hereinafter set forth, agree as follows: ARTICLE 1 - WORK CONTRACTOR shall complete all Work as specified or indicated in the Contract Documents. The Work is generally described as follows: Temporary Day Laborers ARTICLE 2 -THE PROJECT The Project for which the Work under the Contract Documents may be the whole or only a part is generally described as follows: Project Name: Annual Bid for Day Labor Bid Number: 2018035 ARTICLE 3 - CONTRACT TERM Initial term of agreement will be from award through December 31, 2018, with two one-year extensions available subject to vendor acceptance, satisfactory performance and staffs determination that a renewal would be in the best interest of the County. ARTICLE 4 - CONTRACT PRICE OWNER shall pay CONTRACTOR at the hourly rates provided in their submitted bid (Exhibit 1) and invoiced weekly. ARTICLE 5 - INDEMNIFICATION 5.01 CONTRACTOR shall indemnify and hold harmless the OWNER, and its officers and employees, from liabilities, damages, losses and costs, including, but not limited to, reasonable attorney's fees, to the extent caused by the negligence, recklessness, or intentional wrongful misconduct of the CONTRACTOR and persons employed or utilized by the CONTRACTOR in the performance of the Work. ARTICLE 7 - CONTRACTOR'S REPRESENTATIONS 7.01 In order to induce OWNER to enter into this Agreement CONTRACTOR makes the following representations: 104 A. CONTRACTOR has examined and carefully studied the Contract Documents and the other related data identified in the Invitation to Bid documents. B. CONTRACTOR has visited the Site and become familiar with and is satisfied as to the general, local, and Site conditions that may affect cost, progress, and performance of the Work. C. CONTRACTOR is familiar with and is satisfied as to all federal, state, and local Laws and Regulations that may affect cost, progress, and performance of the Work. D. CONTRACTOR has obtained and carefully studied (or assumes responsibility for having done so) all additional or supplementary examinations, investigations, explorations, tests, studies, and data concerning conditions (surface, subsurface, and Underground Facilities) at or contiguous to the Site which may affect cost, progress, or performance of the Work or which relate to any aspect of the means, methods, techniques, sequences, and procedures of construction to be employed by CONTRACTOR, including applying the specific means, methods, techniques, sequences, and procedures of construction, if any, expressly required by the Contract Documents to be employed by CONTRACTOR, and safety precautions and programs incident thereto. E. CONTRACTOR does not consider that any further examinations, investigations, explorations, tests, studies, or data are necessary for the performance of the Work at the Contract Price, within the Contract Times, and in accordance with the other terms and conditions of the Contract Documents. CONTRACTOR is aware of the general nature of work to be performed by OWNER and others at the Site that relates to the Work as indicated in the Contract Documents. G. CONTRACTOR has correlated the information known to CONTRACTOR, information and observations obtained from visits to the Site, reports and drawings identified in the Contract Documents, and all additional examinations, investigations, explorations, tests, studies, and data with the Contract Documents. H. CONTRACTOR has given OWNER written notice of all conflicts, errors, ambiguities, or discrepancies that CONTRACTOR has discovered in the Contract Documents, and the written resolution thereof by OWNER is acceptable to CONTRACTOR. I. The Contract Documents are generally sufficient to indicate and convey understanding of all terms and conditions for performance and furnishing of the Work. ARTICLE 8 - CONTRACT DOCUMENTS 8.01 Contents A. The Contract Documents consist of the following: (1) This Agreement (pages 1 to 9, inclusive); (2) Certificates of Liability Insurance (3) Invitation to Bid 2018035 105 (4) CONTRACTOR'S Bid Form (pages 12 to 13 of 27, inclusive); (5) Drug Free Workplace Form (pages 14 of 27) (6) Affidavit of Compliance (page 15 of 27); (7) Sworn Statement Under Section 105.08, Indian River County Code, on Disclosure of Relationships (pages 16 to 17 of 27, inclusive); (8) Certification Regarding Lobbying (page 18 of 27) (9) The following which may be delivered or issued on or after the Effective Date of the Agreement and are not attached hereto: a) Written Amendments; b) Work Change Directives; c) Change Order(s). ARTICLE 9 - MISCELLANEOUS 9.01 Terms A. Terms used in this Agreement will have the meanings indicated in the Invitation to Bid. 9.02 Assignment of Contract A. No assignment by a party hereto of any rights under or interests in the Agreement will be binding on another party hereto without the written consent of the party sought to be bound; and, specifically but without limitation, moneys that may become due and moneys that are due may not be assigned without such consent (except to the extent that the effect of this restriction may be limited by law), and unless specifically stated to the contrary in any written consent to an assignment, no assignment will release or discharge the assignor from any duty or responsibility under the Contract Documents. 9.03 Successors and Assigns A. OWNER and CONTRACTOR each binds itself, its partners, successors, assigns, and legal representatives to the other party hereto, its partners, successors, assigns, and legal representatives in respect to all covenants, agreements, and obligations contained in the Contract Documents. 9.04 Severability A. Any provision or part of the Contract Documents held to be void or unenforceable under any Law or Regulation shall be deemed stricken, and all remaining provisions shall continue to be valid and binding upon OWNER and CONTRACTOR, who agree that the Contract Documents shall be reformed 106 to replace such stricken provision or part thereof with a valid and enforceable provision that comes as close as possible to expressing the intention of the stricken provision. 9.05 Venue A. This Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of Florida. Venue for any lawsuit brought by either party against the other party or otherwise arising out of this Agreement shall be in Indian River County, Florida, or, in the event of a federal jurisdiction, in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida. 9.06 Public Records Compliance A. Indian River County is a public agency subject to Chapter 119, Florida Statutes. The Contractor shall comply with Florida's Public Records Law. Specifically, the Contractor shall: (1) Keep and maintain public records required by the County to perform the service. (2) Upon request from the County's Custodian of Public Records, provide the County with a copy of the requested records or allow the records to be inspected or copied within a reasonable time at a cost that does not exceed the cost provided in Chapter 119 or as otherwise provided by law. (3) Ensure that public records that are exempt or confidential and exempt from public records disclosure requirements are not disclosed except as authorized by law for the duration of the contract term and following completion of the contract if the contractor does not transfer the records to the County. (4) Upon completion of the contract, transfer, at no cost, to the County all public records in possession of the Contractor or keep and maintain public records required by the County to perform the service. If the Contractor transfers all public records to the County upon completion of the contract, the Contractor shall destroy any duplicate public records that are exempt or confidential and exempt from public records disclosure requirements. If the contractor keeps and maintains public records upon completion of the contract, the Contractor shall meet all applicable requirements for retaining public records. All records stored electronically must be provided to the County, upon request from the Custodian of Public Records, in a format that is compatible with the information technology systems of the County. B. IF THE CONTRACTOR HAS QUESTIONS REGARDING THE APPLICATION OF CHAPTER 119, FLORIDA STATUTES, TO THE CONTRACTOR'S DUTY TO PROVIDE PUBLIC RECORDS RELATING TO THIS CONTRACT, CONTACT THE CUSTODIAN OF PUBLIC RECORDS AT: (772) 226-1424 publicrecords@ircgov.com Indian River County Office of the County Attorney 180127th Street 107 Vero Beach, FL 32960 C. Failure of the Contractor to comply with these requirements shall be a material breach of this Agreement. ARTICLE 10 — FEDERAL CLAUSES 10.01 OWNER and CONTRACTOR will adhere to the following, as applicable to this work: A. Compliance with the Contract Work Hours and Safety Standards Act. (1) Overtime requirements. No contractor or subcontractor contracting for any part of the contract work which may require or involve the employment of laborers or mechanics shall require or permit any such laborer or mechanic in any workweek in which he or she is employed on such work to work in excess of forty hours in such workweek unless such laborer or mechanic receives compensation at a rate not less than one and one-half times the basic rate of pay for all hours worked in excess of forty hours in such workweek. (2) Violation; liability for unpaid wages; liquidated damages. In the event of any violation of the clause set forth in paragraph (1) of this section the contractor and any subcontractor responsible therefor shall be liable for the unpaid wages. In addition, such contractor and subcontractor shall be liable to the United States (in the case of work done under contract for the District of Columbia or a territory, to such District or to such territory), for liquidated damages. Such liquidated damages shall be computed with respect to each individual laborer or mechanic, including watchmen and guards, employed in violation of the clause set forth in paragraph (1) of this section, in the sum of $10 for each calendar day on which such individual was required or permitted to work in excess of the standard workweek of forty hours without payment of the overtime wages required by the clause set forth in paragraph (1) of this section. (3) Withholding for unpaid wages and liquidated damages. The County shall upon its own action or upon written request of an authorized representative of the Department of Labor withhold or cause to be withheld, from any moneys payable on account of work performed by the contractor or subcontractor under any such contract or any other Federal contract with the same prime contractor, or any other federally -assisted contract subject to the Contract Work Hours and Safety Standards Act, which is held by the same prime contractor, such sums as may be determined to be necessary to satisfy any liabilities of such contractor or subcontractor for unpaid wages and liquidated damages as provided in the clause set forth in paragraph (2) of this section. (4) Subcontracts. The contractor or subcontractor shall insert in any subcontracts the clauses set forth in paragraph (1) through (4) of this section and also a clause requiring the subcontractors to include these clauses in any lower tier subcontracts. The prime contractor shall be responsible for compliance by any subcontractor or lower tier subcontractor with the clauses set forth in paragraphs (1) through (4) of this section. B. Energy Policy and Conservation Act. The Contractor agrees to comply with mandatory standards and policies relating to energy efficiency which are contained in the state energy conservation plan issued in compliance with the Energy Policy and Conservation Act. C. Suspension and Debarment. (1) This contract is a covered transaction for purposes of 2 C.F.R. pt. 180 and 2 C.F.R. pt. 3000. As such the contractor is required to verify that none of the contractor, its principals (defined at 2 108 C.F.R. § 180.995), or its affiliates (defined at 2 C.F.R. § 180.905) are excluded (defined at 2 C.F.R. § 180.940) or disqualified (defined at 2 C.F.R. § 180.935). (2) The contractor must comply with 2 C.F.R. pt. 180, subpart C and 2 C.F.R. pt. 3000, subpart C and must include a requirement to comply with these regulations in any lower tier covered transaction it enters into. (3) This certification is a material representation of fact relied upon by Indian River County. If it is later determined that the contractor did not comply with 2 C.F.R. pt. 180, subpart C and 2 C.F.R. pt. 3000, subpart C, in addition to remedies available to the State of Florida and Indian River County, the Federal Government may pursue available remedies, including but not limited to suspension and/or debarment. (4) The bidder or proposer agrees to comply with the requirements of 2 C.F.R. pt. 180, subpart C and 2 C.F.R. pt. 3000, subpart C while this offer is valid and throughout the period of any contract that may arise from this offer. The bidder or proposer further agrees to include a provision requiring such compliance in its lower tier covered transactions. D. Procurement of Recycled/Recovered Materials: (1) In the performance of this contract, the Contractor shall make maximum use of products containing recovered materials that are EPA -designated items unless the product cannot be acquired— (i) Competitively within a timeframe providing for compliance with the contract performance schedule; (ii) Meeting contract performance requirements; or (iii) At a reasonable price. (2) Information about this requirement is available at EPA's Comprehensive Procurement Guidelines we b site, http://www.epa.gov/cpg/. The list of EPA -designate items is available at http://www.epa.gov/cpg/products.htm. E. Access to Records The following access to records requirements apply to this contract: (1) The contractor agrees to provide Indian River County, the FEMA Administrator, the Comptroller General of the United States, or any of their authorized representatives access to any books, documents, papers, and records of the Contractor which are directly pertinent to this contract for the purposes of making audits, examinations, excerpts, and transcriptions. (2) The Contractor agrees to permit any of the foregoing parties to reproduce by any means whatsoever or to copy excerpts and transcriptions as reasonably needed. (3) The contractor agrees to provide the FEMA Administrator or his authorized representatives access to construction or other work sites pertaining to the work being completed under the contract. F. DHS Seal, Logo, and Flags: The contractor shall not use the Department of Homeland Security seal(s), logos, crests, or reproductions of flags or likenesses of DHS agency officials without specific FEMA pre -approval. G. Compliance with Federal Law, Regulations, and Executive Orders: This is an acknowledgement that FEMA financial assistance may be used to fund the contract. The contractor will comply will all applicable federal law, regulations, executive orders, FEMA policies, procedures, and directives. 109 H. No Obligation by Federal Government: he Federal Government is not a party to this contract and is not subject to any obligations or liabilities to the non -Federal entity, contractor, or any other party pertaining to any matter resulting from the contract. I. Program Fraud and False or Fraudulent Statements or Related Acts: The contractor acknowledges that 31 U.S.C. Chap. 38 (Administrative Remedies for False Claims and Statements) applies to the contractor's actions pertaining to this contract. J. AFFIRMATIVE STEPS: CONTRACTOR shall take the following affirmative steps to ensure minority business, women's business enterprises and labor surplus area firms are used when possible: (1) Placing qualified small and minority businesses and women's business enterprises on solicitation lists. (2) Ensuring that small and minority businesses, and women's business enterprises are solicited whenever they are potential sources. (3) Dividing total requirements, when economically feasible, into smaller tasks or quantities to permit maximum participation by small and minority businesses, and women's business enterprises. (4) Establishing delivery schedules, where the requirement permits, which encourage participation by small and minority businesses, and women's business enterprises. (5) Using the services and assistance of the Small Business Administration and the Minority Business Development Agency of the Department of Commerce. Article 11: TERMINATION OF CONTRACT A. The occurrence of any of the following shall constitute a default by CONTRACTOR and shall provide the OWNER with a right to terminate this Contract in accordance with this Article, in addition to pursuing any other remedies which the OWNER may have under this Contract or under law: (1) if in the OWNER's opinion CONTRACTOR is improperly performing work or violating any provision(s) of the Contract Documents; (2) if CONTRACTOR neglects or refuses to correct defective work or replace defective parts or equipment, as directed by the Engineer pursuant to an inspection; (3) if in the OWNER's opinion CONTRACTOR's work is being unnecessarily delayed and will not be finished within the prescribed time; (4) if CONTRACTOR assigns this Contract or any money accruing thereon or approved thereon; or (5) if CONTRACTOR abandons the work, is adjudged bankrupt, or if he makes a general assignment for the benefit of his creditors, or if a trustee or receiver is appointed for CONTRACTOR or for any of his property. B. OWNER shall, before terminating the Contract for any of the foregoing reasons, notify CONTRACTOR in writing of the grounds for termination and provide CONTRACTOR with ten (10) calendar days to cure the default to the reasonable satisfaction of the OWNER. C. If the CONTRACTOR fails to correct or cure within the time provided in the preceding Sub -Article B, OWNER may terminate this Contract by notifying CONTRACTOR in writing. Upon receiving such notification, CONTRACTOR shall immediately cease all work hereunder and shall forfeit any further right to possess or occupy the site or any materials thereon; provided, however, that the OWNER may authorize CONTRACTOR to restore any work sites. 110 D. The CONTRACTOR shall be liable for: (1) any new cost incurred by the OWNER in soliciting bids or proposals for and letting a new contract; and (2) the difference between the cost of completing the new contract and the cost of completing this Contract; (3) any court costs and attorney's fees associated with any lawsuit undertaken by OWNER to enforce its rights herein. E. TERMINATION FOR CONVENIENCE: OWNER may at any time and for any reason terminate CONTRACTOR's services and work for OWNER's convenience. Upon receipt of notice of such termination CONTRACTOR shall, unless the notice directs otherwise, immediately discontinue the work, and immediately cease ordering of any materials, labor, equipment, facilities, or supplies in connection with the performance of this Contract. Upon such termination Contractor shall be entitled to payment only as follows: (1) the actual cost of the work completed in conformity with this Contract and the specifications; plus, (2) such other costs actually incurred by CONTRACTOR as are permitted by the prime contract and approved by the OWNER. Contractor shall not be entitled to any other claim for compensation or damages against the County in the event of such termination. 111 Annual Bid for Day Labor 2018035 F: The Addendum for The Supply of Temporary Staffing Services is attached hereto and fully incorporated herein by this reference. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, OWNER and CONTRACTOR have signed this Agreement in duplicate. One counterpart each has been delivered to OWNER and CONTRACTOR. All portions of the Contract Documents have been signed or identified by OWNER and CONTRACTOR or on their behalf. This Agreement will be effective on , 20_ (the date the Agreement is approved by the Indian River County Board of County Commissioners, which is the Effective Date of the Agreement). 101TA1 4A INDIAN RIVER COUNTY By: Peter D. O'Bryan, Chairman By: Jason E. Brown, County Administrator APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGAL SUFFICIENCY: By: Dylan Reingold, County Attorney Jeffrey R. Smith, Clerk of Court and Comptroller Attest: Deputy Clerk (SEAL) Designated Representative: Name: Title: Address: Phone Email CONTRACTOR: PeopleReady Florida, Inc. By• (Contr r (CORPORATE SEAL) Attest`.,✓ Address forgiving notices: 1015 A Street Tacoma, WA 98402 License No. N/A (Where applicable) Agent for service of process: Designated Representative: Name: Title: Address: Phone: Email: (If CONTRACTOR is a corporation or a partnership, attach evidence of authority to sign.) Page 27 of 27 112 people ready A TRUESLUE COMPANY ADDENDUM FOR THE SUPPLY OF TEMPORARY STAFFING SERVICES THIS ADDENDUM ("Addendum") is between PeopleReady Florida, Inc. ("Supplier") and Indian River County ("Customer'), and attached to and incorporated in the Agreement ("Agreement") attached hereto between Supplier and Customer. In the event of any conflict between the terms and conditions of the attached Agreement, any exhibits, addenda, schedules or attachments, and this Addendum, the terms of this Addendum shall supersede and control such conflict. 1. Relationship. The parties agree that Supplier is a vendor of temporary labor, and not a contractor or subcontractor and shall not be responsible for the obligations in the contract related to Customer's project, innluding (without limitation) the construction schedule, trade scope details, construction details performance guarantees or accuracy or warranties of construction. Nor shall Supplier have responsibility for materials or installation, acquiring permits, conducting safety meetings, posting signs, providing water or power, delays, defaults, or furnishing a bond. Customer has requested that Supplier provide its temporary employees ("Associates") to assist Customer in the completion of Customer's business activities. 2. Guarantee: Minimum Work Day. If Customer is dissatisfied with any Associate for any reason, Customer may simply inform Supplier within the first two (2) hours of Associates assignment and Customer will not be billed for that Associate and Supplier will provide a replacement within a reasonable amount of time. Such replacement of unsatisfactory Associates is Supplier's sole warranty hereunder. Customer agrees to a daily minimum charge of four (4) hours. If Customer fails to cancel any order at least two (2) hours prior to the assignment start time, Customer will pay the daily minimum charge for each Associate. 3. Supervision: Safety. Customer agrees to provide Associates adequate supervision, direction, and control. Customer will determine whether Associates meet any skill, competency, license, or other requirements necessary to complete specific jobs to Customer's own satisfaction. Customer and Supplier agree to comply with all applicable laws relating to health and safety, and Customer agrees to comply with OSHA and provide site specific safety equipment necessary for any work to be performed. Customer agrees to provide site-specific safety orientation and training to all Associates prior to the start of an assignment. Without the prior written agreement of Supplier, Customer will not entrust Associates with the care of unattended premises, custody or control of cash, credit cards, keys, or other similar valuables or authorize Associates to operate machinery, heavy equipment, or motor vehicles. 4. Compliance with Laws. Both Customer and Supplier agree to maintain their work environment in compliance with all applicable laws, including Title VII, Affordable Care Act ("PPACA"), FLSA, wage and hour laws, and laws prohibiting discrimination. Supplier shall comply with the PPACA with regard to Associates. Customer shall not utilize Supplier's services to avoid compliance with any of the above laws and regulations. Customer shall determine and notify Supplier in writing if a prevailing wage, living wage, or any other government mandated minimum statutory wage under the Services Contract Act, Davis Bacon Act, or any other similar government mandated min mum statutory wage should be paid to the Associates and in no event shall Customer be relieved of its primary responsibility for ensuring complete and accurate compliance with all local, state, and federal laws relating to prevailing or living wage. 5. Conversion Fees. Unless otherwise agreed to by both parties, Customer may not hire or convert an Associate to Customer's payroll, or to a third party's payroll, whether directly or indirectly, until such Associate has worked 90 days or 520 hours, whichever is greater. Thereafter, Customer may hire an Associate for a fee which will equal three times a full week of work (or base rate x 120 hours). 6. Indemnity and Insurance. IN NO EVENT SHALL EITHER PARTY BE LIABLE FOR LOST PROFITS, OR FOR ANY CONSEQUENTIAL, INCIDENTAL, INDIRECT, EXEMPLARY, SPECIAL OR PUNITIVE DAMAGES, REGARDLESS OF WHETHER SUCH. LIABILITY ARISES OUT OF OR IS RELATED TO BREACH OF CONTRACT, TORT OR OTHERWISE. Customer agrees to the insurance levels and endorsements stated in the certificate of insurance provided. Customer's additional insured status on Suppliers insurance policies shall only extend to the extent of Supplier's negligence. 7. Payment. Customer will accurately record the daily hours worked by each Associate, and report hours worked to Supplier as agreed. Bili rates will be increased to reflect holiday hours worked and overtime hours worked according to state or local law. The agreed hourly bill rates are subject to adjustment from time to time by Supplier to reflect increases in Supplier's actual or government mandated cost for wages, withholding amounts, governmental taxes, assessments, health care, workers' compensation insurance increases, your use of a vendor management system, and/or any other cause beyond the reasonable control of Supplier. Supplier will endeavor to notify Customer fourteen (14) days before the effective date of the increase in the hourly rate along with information supporting the reason for the increase. Customer may terminate this Agreement by giving written notice to Supplier prior to the effective date provided; otherwise the adjusted hourly rate will become effective on the date specified in the notice. Invoices are due within seven (7) days of the invoice date, with no retained percentage withheld from payment and without regard to Customer's receipt of payment from any other party. Customer agrees to pay interest charges of the lesser of 1'/:% per month, or the maximum rate permitted by law, together with reasonable attorneys' fees and/or coilectioi fees for invoices which are unpaid more than thirty (30) days after the date of the invoice. Customer's failure to dispute in writing the charges on any invoice within fourteen (14) hays of receipt shall constitute irrevocable acceptance of such charges and a waiver of the right to later dispute or reject any charges stated on the invoice. ACKNOWLEDGED AND AGREED Customer Signed: Name: Date: Rev. Oct 2016 113 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA AGENDA ITEM Assistant County Administrator / Department of General Services Date: March 12, 2018 To: The Honorable Board of County Commissioners Thru: Jason E. Brown, County Administrator Thru: Michael C. Zito, Assistant County Administrator From: Beth Powell, Conservation Lands Manager Subject: Request for Board Approval of a Resolution for a Grant Application to the Florida Inland Navigation District for Public Use Improvements at the Jones' Pier Conservation Area It is requested that the Board of County Commissioners formally consider the following information at the Board's regular meeting of March 20, 2018. DESCRIPTIONS AND CONDITIONS: In September 2008, the Board of County Commissioners purchased the historic Jones' Pier site under the County's environmental lands program. The subject waterfront property consists of approximately 16.5 acres located on south Jungle Trail. The property was acquired for conservation and historic preservation purposes with a 45% cost -share grant from the Florida Communities Trust. On March 6, 2018, the Board of County Commissioners authorized staff to pursue an application to the Florida Inland Navigation District (FIND) for the Waterways Assistance Program to complete certain aspects of the public use improvements including the parking lot, restroom facility, pavilion, water/sewer connections and associated pathways. The estimated cost for the improvements is approximately $300,000.00 with 50% of that cost ($150,000.00) to be funded through the FIND grant. Please see Attachment 1 for the proposed improvements provided by MBV under Work Order No. 10. As a part of the FIND Waterways Assistance Program grant application for the referenced improvements, FIND requires that the applicant (Indian River County) provide a resolution authorizing the project and ensuring that the terms of the grant will be met (if awarded). To that end, the attached resolution (Attachment 2) is herein presented for the Board's consideration and approval. ANALYSIS The attached resolution (Attachment E-7 of the FIND grant application) is in standardized format as required by FIND. The resolution indicates that the County is applying for 50% ($150,000.00) of the total estimated cost of the project. The following table provides a breakdown of estimated cost by project elements: 114 Project Elements Estimated Potential Potential County Funding Cost Grant Funds Grant Fund Source Parking, Sidewalks, $300,000 $150,000 Florida Inland Con Lands Restrooms, Pavilion, Navigation CIE/Windsor Educational Signage District FUNDING: The Board approved increased funding for access improvements in December 2015, through an amendment to the Comprehensive Plan's Capital Improvements Element and updated the County's 5 Year Capital Improvements Program Schedule to allocate $2.9 million dollars over a five-year period to be utilized toward public access improvements on conservation lands. Due to historical structures on site, ability to apply for matching grants, partnership and interest from the IRCHS, and public interest in this conservation area, the Jones' Pier Conservation Area has been identified as high priority for public use improvements. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners approve the attached resolution (FIND grant application "Attachment E-7") and authorize the Board Chairman to sign the resolution on behalf of the County. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Conceptual site plan depicting public use improvements provided by MBV under Work Order No. 10 2. Copy of Resolution for Assistance 2018 (FIND grant application "Attachment E-7) 3. IRC Grant Form — FIND Waterways Assistance Program APPROVED AGENDA ITEM FOR MARCH 20.2018 115 im I ATTACHMENT E-7 RESOLUTION FOR ASSISTANCE 2018 UNDER THE FLORIDA INLAND NAVIGATION DISTRICT WATERWAYS ASSISTANCE PROGRAM WHEREAS, THE Indian River County BCC is interested in carrying out the (Name of Agency) following described project for the enjoyment of the citizenry of Indian River County and the State of Florida: Project Title Tones' Pier Conservation Area Public Use Improvements Total Estimated Cost $ 300,000.00 Brief Description of Project: Construction of public use improvements at the Jones' Pier Conservation Area inlcuding a parking area, restrooms, sewer and water connections, walkways, a picnic pavilion, educational signage and boardwalks. AND, Florida Inland Navigation District financial assistance is required for the program mentioned above, NOW THEREFORE, be it resolved by the Indian River County BCC (Name of Agency) that the project described above be authorized, AND, be it further resolved that said Indian River County BCC (Name of Agency) make application to the Florida Inland Navigation District in the amount of 50 % of the actual cost of the project in behalf of said Indian River County BCC (Name of Agency) AND, be it further resolved by the Indian River County BCC (Name of Agency) that it certifies to the following: That it will accept the terms and conditions set forth in FIND Rule 6613-2 F.A.C. and which will be a part of the Project Agreement for any assistance awarded under the attached proposal. 2. That it is in complete accord with the attached proposal and that it will carry out the Program in the manner described in the proposal and any plans and specifications attached thereto unless prior approval for any change has been received from the District. (1) Form No. 90-21 (Effective date 12-17-90, Rev. 10-14 13)7 3. That it has the ability and intention to finance its share of the cost of the project and that the project will be operated and maintained at the expense of said Indian River County BCC for public use. (Name of Agency) 4. That it will not discriminate against any person on the basis of race, color or national origin in the use of any property or facility acquired or developed pursuant to this proposal, and shall comply with the terms and intent of the Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, P. L. 88-352 (1964) and design and construct all facilities to comply fully with statutes relating to accessibility by persons with disabilities as well as other federal, state and local laws, rules and requirements. 5. That it will maintain adequate financial records on the proposed project to substantiate claims for reimbursement. 6. That it will make available to FIND if requested, a post -audit of expenses incurred on the project prior to, or in conjunction with, request for the final 10% of the funding agreed to by FIND. This is to certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of a resolution duly and legally adopted by the Indian River County BCC at a legal meeting held on this 20th day of March 2018 Attest Title Signature Title (2) Form No. 90-21 (Effective date 12-17-90, Rev. 10-14-08 GRANT NAME: Florida Inland Navigation District — Waterways Assistance Program GRANT # AMOUNT OF GRANT: TBD — no more than $150,000 DEPARTMENT RECEIVING GRANT: Conservation Lands CONTACT PERSON: Beth Powell TELEPHONE: 226-1873 1. How long is the grant for? 3 Years Starting Date: October 1, 2018 2. Does the grant require you to fund this function after the grant is over? Yes X No 3. Does the grant require a match? ___X_Yes No If yes, does the grant allow the match to be In -Kind services? Yes X No 4. Percentage of match to grant TBD - 50%-75% 5. Grant match amount required TRT) - no less than .150,000 6. Where are the matching funds coming from (i.e. In -Kind Services; Reserve for Contingency)? Conservation Lands Capital Improvements 7. Does the grant cover capital costs or start-up costs? If no, how much do you think will be needed in capital costs or start-up costs: (Attach a detail listing of costs) 8. Are you adding any additional positions utilizing the grant funds? If yes, please list. (If additional space is needed, please attach a schedule.) X Yes No Yes X No u Acct. IDescription Position Position Position ( Position Position 0 11. 12 1 Regular Salaries 011.13 Other Salaries & Wages (PT) 012.11 Social Security 012.12 Retirement — Contributions 012.13 Insurance — Life & Health 012.14 Worker's Compensation 012.17 S/Sec. Medicare Matching $ TOTAL 9. What is the total cost of each position including benefits, capital, start-up, auto expense, travel and operating? Salary and Benefits Operating Costs Capital Total Costs 10. What is the estimated cost of the grant to the county over five years? Signature of Preparer: i� Date: Grant Amount Other Match Costs Not Covered Match Total First Year $ 150,000.00 $ $ +150,000.00 $TBD Second Year $ $ $ $ Third Year $ $ $ $ Fourth Year $ $ $ $ Fifth Year § 1 $ $ $ Signature of Preparer: i� Date: CONSENT AGENDA BCC Meeting 03/2012018 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA AGENDA ITEM Assistant County Administrator / Department of General Services Date: March 13, 2018 To: The Honorable Board of County Commissioners Through: Jason E. Brown, County Administrator Michael C. Zito, Assistant County Administrator From: Brad Bernauer, Human Services Director Subject: Children's Services Advisory Committee's Recommendation RFP # 2018050 - New Focus Areas for 2018-19 and Sample Agency Contract BACKGROUND: Attached, please find copies of the Children's Services Advisory Committee's recommendations for the RFP #2018050 for the funding year 2018-19. Also included is a Sample Agency Contract for 2018-19 and the Focus Areas for 2018-19 as recommended by the CSAC Needs Subcommittee and approved by the CSAC. The purpose of this request is to obtain the Board of County Commissioners' approval of the attached RFP # 2018050, the Focus Areas and the Children Services Advisory Committee Funding Contract for 2018-19 to be executed by the agencies. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board accept the RFP #2018050 for 2018-19 and Agency Contract as submitted and authorize the Chairman to execute the individual contracts. ATTACHMENT: RFP #2018050 Children's Services Advisory Committee Grant Funds for Children's Programs Sample Agency— Indian River County Grant Contract for 2018-19 Funding Focus Areas of Need 2018-19 APPROVED AGENDA ITEM FOR BCC MEETING OF MARCH 20.2018 C:\Users\legistar\AppData\Local\Temp\BCL Technologies\easyPDF 8\@BCL@800DC65A\@BCL@800DC65A.doc 120 March 23, 2018 Indian River County Purchasing Division 1800 2711 Street Vero Beach, FL 32960 (772) 226 - 1575 purchasing(Wircgov.com RE: Request for Proposal #2018050 Children Services Advisory Committee Attention: Applicant At their meeting on March 20, 2018, the Board of County Commissioners approved the above referenced proposal for advertisemeht. T ;"is Request for Proposal is for the new contract period beginning October 11 2018 through September 30, 2019 which allows for Not -for -Profit, Flo Profit, Government agencies and individuals to apply for funding of pro rams for Indian River County children. 14 There is a mandatory Applicant's Orientation conference scheduled for April 5, 2018, 12:00 pm at the County Admin,(stration Complex, Building B, Room 61- 501, located at 1800 27th Street; Vero* Beach, Florida. All prospective applicants are required to attend. This year, applications will be received electronically to reduce production cost and time. Detailed informat4tA this process, from enrollment with the online platform through submiift6l of lyour application will be provided at the Mandatory Applicant's Orientation,&.onference. One electronicsURnittal via www.BidExpress.com by 2:00 PM on May 1, 2018 is required per program. If you have any questions, call Brad Bernauer, Human Services Program Manager, 772-226-1467. Yours truly, Jennifer Hyde Purchasing Manager 121 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY PURCHASING DIVISION 1800 27TH STREET VERO BEACH FL 32960-3365 (772) 226-1416 REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL PROJECT NAME: Children's Services Advisory Committee Grant Funds for Children's Programs RFP NUMBER: 2018050 REFER ALL QUESTIONS TO: PURCHASING MANAGER TELEPHONE: (772) 226-1416 E-MAIL: purchasing@ircgov.com RFP OPENING DATE: MAY 1, 2018 RFP OPENING TIME: 2:00 P.M All proposals must be fully completeddantl submitted online via BidExpress.com prior to the bid opening date and time shown above. 122 2018-19 CHILDREN'S SERVICES ADVISORY COMMITTEE REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL (RFP) #2018050 RFP is to allow Not -for -Profit, For -Profit, Government Agencies and Individuals to apply for funding to provide programs for Indian River County children. Forms required to submit the applications are available via BidExpress.com and the I application package may be requested from purchasing@ircgov.com Mandatory Applicants Orientation -Conference April 5, 2018 at 12:00,p m_�, Indian River County Administration Complex 1800 27th Street, Vero BeatLh, Florida Building B; $oom-131-501 DEADLINE,,FOR*SUBMITTING RFP 2018050 Tuesaay:!May 1, 2018, 2:00 p.m. �1 123 REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS Notice is hereby given that the Indian River County Board of County Commissioners is calling for and requesting proposals for the following: RFP # 2018050 Children's' Services to allow Not -for -Profit, For -Profit, Government Agencies and Individuals to apply for funding to provide programs for Indian River County children. There is a mandatory Applicant's Orientation Conference scheduled for April 5, 2018, 12:00 pm at the County Administration Complex, Building B, Room B1-501, located at 180, Q,27,tn Street, Vero Beach, Florida. All prospective applicants are required to attend. � ,qj Deadline for receipt of proposals has been set for 2:00 PM on Mav VNI 1420;18. The Board of County Commissioners reserves the right to accep lo,oreject any and all proposals in whole or in part and to waive all informalities. PURCHASING MANAGER INDIAN RIVER COUNTY Publish: March For Publication in the Indian RiverPress`lournal on Friday, March 23, 2018 .. Y Please furnish Tear Sheet Affida'vi'Publication and Invoice to: Indian River County , Purchasing Division '� 180027 to Street, Vero Beach, FL 32960 124 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL To allow Not for Profit, For Profit, Government Agencies and Individuals to apply for funding, to provide programs for Indian River County Children. RFP NUMBER: 2018050 DEADLINE TO SUBMIT: 2:00 p.m. May 1, 2018 PROPOSALS MUST BE SUBMITTED PRIOR TO ABOVE DEADLINE THROUGH WWW.BIDEXPRESS.COM MANDATORY ORIENTATION MEETING: April 5, 2018,12:00 p.m. �> Indian River County Administration Complexpb 1800 27th Street, Vero Beach, Florida Building B; Room B1-501 /� REQUESTS FOR INFORMATION: �%=7 Requests for information regarding this RFP should be directed%: Brad Bernauer, Human"SeNices Director Indian River County H man Services 180027 th Street Vero Beach, FL 32960 Phone (77�,2N='14 22 Fax (772 100 6d)�� 16 Ema'z2f-resses: Bradley. Bernauer@flhealth.gov 125 INTRODUCTION & BACKGROUND The Children's Services Advisory Committee of Indian River County was formed by Indian River County Ordinance 99.01, Chapter 103, as an advisory board to the Indian River County Board of Commissioners. Section 103.20. Purpose. The purpose of the Children's Services Advisory Committee is to promote healthy children in a healthy community. The term "healthy" encompasses socioeconomic, physical, environmental, educational and behavioral health. Section 103.21. Objective. 1) The objective of the Children's Services Advisory Committee is to provide a unified system of planning and delivery, within which children's needs can be identified, targeted, evaluated and addressed by the Children's Services Advisory Committee. 2) Definition of a child. Any person who has not attained the age of eighteen (18) years, also minor. The Children's Services Advisory Committee recommends funding for programAs.to the Board of County Commissioners. The final decision for funding will be made by the Indi4mkiivel County Board of County Commissioners.► The Children's Services Advisory Committee is seeking programs, t�t'provide services to the children and families of Indian River County; and are documented as needed'in the 2014/15 Indian River County Community Needs Assessment. Applications are accepted from��governmental agencies, for-profit, and not-for-profit organizations; and from individuals. MISSION STATEMENT The mission of the Children's Services Advisory�m,mittee is to facilitate and coordinate the planning and development of an effective and collaborative health and human services delivery system to meet the needs of the children and families of Indi6n River County. The Children's Services Advisory Commtittee'strongly supports cultural diversity and encourages its funded programs to demonstrate tht- inclusion of all children and families in program development and implementation. 1W VISION STATEMENT The efforts of the Childr ,nt.'s Services Advisory Committee will insure the development of a shared vision for the health and human services delivery system in Indian River County enabling funding sources and providers to define and perform their roles in a dynamically changing environment. OVER -ARCHING OUTCOMES Improve the capacity of children in Indian River County to succeed to adulthood in a safe, healthy and productive manner. Support caregivers — a child's most important resource — to be and do what is needed to shepherd children to adulthood in a safe, healthy and productive manner. 126 FUNDING FOCUS AREAS OF NEED 2018-2019 Introduction: The 2014 IRC Children's Needs Assessment has provided valuable information to help guide the Child Services Advisory Committee (CSAC). Parts of this data was reevaluated in 2018. The following outlines what will be considered for all grant requests. Larger Picture The community must start taking a long-term view focusing 15-25 years out. We have a cycle of poverty in IRC that has been increasing and needs to be broken. Interventions should start as early as possible in a child's life in order to have the greatest impact. IRC agencies should use best practices. a. Evidence based with measurable outcomes over time b. Cost effective/efficient c. Skilled executive, program, and board leadership d. Strong fiscal management e. Opportunity for broad impact (replicable, scralable, lever gable) Focus should be on the pockets of poverty. Given that IRC poverty is in geographically disbursed pockets and that we have unique transportation problems, we must always keep in mind that services need to be available where And when people need and can access them. We must utilize the best mediums to clearly corximur'i a what, when and where these services are available. Collaboration in the community is essss � t�taand can help optimize human and financial resources, expose and eliminate over&p! The considerations highlighted a-bove have precedence over the actual CSAC Focus Areas listed below. X Needs Assessment process and updated for clarity.) Mental health affects every Focus Area. We have decided not to make mental health a separate Focus Area, but to evaluate mental health interventions relevant to each Focus Area. 1. Early Childhood Development This encompasses birth to age 5. For the younger children, this would mean improving the interactions they have beginning at birth with their caregivers and with focus on physical, social emotional and cognitive development. It would include improving the quality at childcare, PreK and Voluntary PreK providers as well as improving financial accessibility by leveraging available federal and state funds. 127 Why: Research shows that the period 0-5 is the most important time for brain development. Physical, social emotional and cognitive skills can be significantly impacted during this time. 2. Build Parent Capacity This encompasses improving parenting skills at every age of a child's life and providing support mechanisms for parents, including the pre -natal period. A priority would be new parents in particular first time and single parents and those in the poverty pockets. Why: A parent is a child's first and most important teacher. We need to equip parents to be the good parents that they all want to be. 3. After school and summer recreational activities and academic enrichment Droarams They need to be free/affordable and accessible (transportation) to parents and children. They should include a literacy/tutoring component. We hold agencies to a high ttandard of what constitutes academic enrichment. Mentoring programs are included. Thee is a large gap of programs for children 12+. off+ � J Why: Children need to develop positive out of school outlets tha1�ke. p them engaged in school, --;> promote their health and provide connections (to sports/hobbies,ra person or group, etc). There is a wealth of data supporting extended day and extenddd year. 4. Middle and High School programs thz Programs that help adolescents and teens d law-abiding citizens and address risky behai teen pregnancy, STDs, bullying, etc.) ;'tools to become productive, healthy and ol, tobacco, vaping, drugs, delinquency, Why: There is a lot of at risk behavior and we need to ensure that it is addressed early and repeatedly. �� 128 TIMETABLE 1. RFP applications will be emailed to all interested parties. It is imperative that all interested parties provide the Executive Director with current and accurate email addresses: Bradley.Bernauer(@flhealth.gov. 2. Applicants Orientation Conference. April 5, 2018, 12:00 p.m. The Orientation Conference will be held in the Indian River County Administration Complex, 1800 27t' Street, Vero Beach, FL., Building B, Room 131-501. All prospective applicants are required to attend. 3. Proposals Due on May 1, 2018,2:00 p.m. ONLINE VIA BidExpress.com. 4. An official authorized to bind the applicant to the proposed activity must sign the proposals. Applicant's audit should be included in the RFP (if available). 5. Copies Required. One electronic submittal through www. Bid Express. comx!s is required per program. 6. Grant Review Sub -Committee's Recommendations for Funding ar (pproved, or disapproved, by the Children's Services Advisory Committee in June 2018; and ppresented to the Board of County Commissioners at the Budget Hearings, June 2018. Z _W 7. Contract Dates are from October 1, 2018 through Sept0m15e—ir 30, 2019. DISQUALIFICATION Any one, or combination of, the two items listed belowwillydilqualify an applicant from further consideration as a qualified applicant. 1. Failure to include proof of ability to obtairinequired liability insurance having Indian River County as an additional insured, conta�ined�Ahe contract attached to the proposal. 2. Failure to submit all portions of the proposal by stated deadline. PROCEDURES AND REQUIREMENT S� • All applicants are re uired to�attend the Applicants' Orientation Conference on April 5, 2018, 12:00 p.m., Indian River C L nNAdministration Complex, 1800 27 Street, Vero Beach, Florida; Building B, Room B1-50J*A e purpose of the meeting is to go over the application, general requirements, andsfor staff-t"o respond to any questions. After this meeting all questions and answers shall b0i educed to writing, and mailed to all attendees. • All agencies, or individuals, receiving a grant will be required to mention the Children's Services Advisory Committee and Indian River County as a funder, or partial funder of the program, in all printed material and press releases. • All agencies, or individuals, receiving a $100,000 grant or more, will be required to provide Indian River County with a financial audit within 120 days after the end of the agency's fiscal year. The following items will NOT be reimbursed by the Indian River County Board of County Commissioners, or by the Children's Services Advisory Committee: • Any expense not outlined in the agency's funding application. • Capital expenses of any amount. • Cell phone charges. • Costs incurred by applicants in responding to the RFP. 129 • Expenses other than those related to the curriculum or staffing of the program. • Expenses incurred prior to the first date of the grant. • Travel expenses not related to the delivery of the program. • Travel outside of Indian River County • Sick or vacation day payments for employees. • Salary payments to relatives working for agencies receiving grant funds, per the Indian River County's policy on nepotism. All materials and supporting documentation submitted in response to the RFP become public documents and the property of the Indian River Board of County Commissioners. EVALUATION CRITERIA The proposals will be reviewed and evaluated by the Grant Review Sub -Committee, which consists of members of the Children's Services Advisory Committee and other citizens of Indian River County. STANDARDS FOR EVALUATION 1. The program addresses, directly or indirectly, one or more ofthe Ghil ren's Services Advisory Committee's Focus Areas. 2. The program incorporates a system to bring the target population in need of services to the program. 3. The program has a substantial impact, directly or in"dir cttlly, on the achievement of one or more of the Children's Services Advisory Committees Focus Areas, and incorporates measurable outcomes to demonstrate such impact. b 4. The focus of the program is early intervention;; tthe prevention of a problem before it occurs, rather than the treatment and rehabilitationof anlndividual after the problem occurs. 5. The amount of funding requested is aswise,mvestment of community funds. The amount spent is reasonable relative to the n rnberi of persons served and the results achieved. 6. The agency offering the program has the organizational capacity to deliver the program successfully (management, financial stability, board effectiveness, community support, etc.) 7. This program is part of a coordinated collaborative approach designed to achieve one of the Children's Services Advis„or't, ommittee's Focus Areas. Upon the Indian River County Broad of -Commissioners decision, contracts with applicant will be finalized as soon as possible. Prograo�nitoring, written quarterly reports, and mid -year presentations to the Grant Review Sub -Committee will -be developed with grant recipients after contract finalization. THE CHILDREN'S SERVICES ADVISORY COMMITTEE AND THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS RESERVE THE RIGHT TO REJECT ANY OR ALL PROPOSALS, TO WAIVE ANY NON -SUBSTANTIVE DEFICIENCY OR IRREGULARITY, AND TO AWARD A CONTRACT IN WHAT THE CHILDREN'S SERVICES ADVISORY COMMITTEE AND BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS BELIEVE TO BE IN THE BEST INTEREST OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY CHILDREN. SPECIAL CONTRACT TERMS AND CONDITIONS Contract Procedures • For Profit Applicants must provide a copy of most recent Federal Tax Return with application. Period of Performance • Grant contract will run from October 1, 2018 through September 30, 2019. 130 Invoicing and Payment • All payments are based on reimbursement. • All requests for payment should be submitted to Indian River County Human Services Department, Attention: Brad Bernauer, 1800 27th Street, Vero Beach, Florida 32960. • Request for payment must be submitted in a timely manner (monthly, whenever possible). • Reimbursements will be limited to 25% of the contracted dollar amount during each calendar quarter unless preapproval is granted, (Oct -Dec, Jan -March, Apr -June, July -Sept). • Each reimbursement request must have a Cover Sheet detailing all expenses. For each expense listed, a backup invoice and any other pertinent data must be attached. If the agency requests reimbursement for salaries, other related documentation (i.e., copies of payroll checks, payroll tax checks, invoices, checks for benefits) must be included. • Travel inside the county will be reimbursed according to Florida Statute 112.061. • Payment may be delayed for three reasons; o Improper filing of request. o Not filing quarterly reports with the Department of Human Services within 30 days after the end of each quarter. o Not filing the agency's audit, as required by IRC, in a timelynn'er. ( 7, 01 u 131 SWORN STATEMENT UNDER SECTION 105.08, INDIAN RIVER COUNTY CODE, ON DISCLOSURE OF RELATIONSHIPS THIS FORM MUST BE SIGNED IN THE PRESENCE OF A NOTARY PUBLIC OR OTHER OFFICER AUTHORIZED TO ADMINISTER OATHS. THIS FORM MUST BE SUBMITTED either: 1. electronically signed and notarized in compliance with F.S. 688.50, or 2. As a color pdf of the manually signed and notarized statement 1. This sworn statement MUST be submitted with Bid, Proposal or Contract No. for This sworn statement is submitted by: 1, (Name of entity submitting Statement) whose business address is: a. 3. My name is (Please print name if -individual signing) and my relationship to the entity named abo-te is v 4. 1 understand that an "affiliate" as,d,efined in Section 105.08, Indian River County Code, means: NS�_,q The term "affiliate" includehose officers, directors, executives, partners, shareholders, employees, members ,& agents who are active in the management of the entity. 5. 1 understand that the)elationship with a County Commissioner or County employee that must be disclosed as follows: Father, mother, son, daughter, brother, sister, uncle, aunt, first cousin, nephew, niece, husband, wife, father-in-law, mother-in-law, daughter-in-law, son-in-law, brother-in-law, sister-in-law, stepfather, stepmother, stepson, stepdaughter, stepbrother, stepsister, half brother, half sister, grandparent, or grandchild. 6. Based on information and belief, the statement, which I have marked below, is true in relation to the entity submitting this sworn statement. [Please indicate which statement applies.] Neither the entity submitting this sworn statement, nor any officers, directors, executives, partners, shareholders, employees, members, or agents who are active in management of the 132 entity, have any relationships as defined in section 105.08, Indian River County Code, with any County Commissioner or County employee. The entity submitting this sworn statement, or one or more of the officers, directors, executives, partners, shareholders, employees, members, or agents, who are active in management of the entity have the following relationships with a County Commissioner or County employee: Name of Affiliate or entity STATE OF Name of County Commissioner or employee Relationship w (Signature) (Date) COUNTY OF R_ The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 20___, by _ „, who is personally known to me or who has produced as identification. SIGN: PRINT: NOTARY PUBLIC Notary Public, State at large My Commission Expires: (Seal) 133 SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS CHECKLIST RFP 2018050 One copy of each of the following must be provided for your AGENCY. Only the budget and application documents will need to be completed for each PROGRAM. List of Current Officers and Directors Latest Financial Audit Report & Management Letter that conforms with the AICPA Audit Guide 0 Most recent IRS Form 990, (Including all schedules) Most recent Internal Financial Statement (i.e.: Balance Sheet and Operating Budget Staff Organizational Chart Most Recent Annual Report if available 501(C)(3) IRS Exemption Letter Articles of Incorporation Agency's Bylaws Agency's written policy regarding AffirmativeAction— Taxonomy f Definition for each program , Evidence of Liability and Workers Compensation Insurance Sworn Statement Under Sectionl,0 08, Indian River County Code on Disclosure of Relationships 134 Instructions for the 2018/19 Core Funding Application GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS Please follow the instructions for completion of the Core Application for Funding. The application this year will be completed and submitted primarily online via BidExpress.com. You will be able to download, complete and upload for submittal an Excel spreadsheet file named 2018/19 Budget Forms that contains the required fiscal forms. Be advised that the funders support this core application, however each funder may have different individual priorities and require different portions to be completed for that funder. Each funder may have specific penalties if required items are not included. Please carefully review the instructions for the funders to whom you are applying. Each funder requires an individualized application for each program. The use of core items in the narrative and fiscal sections should simplify application for t�esame program to several funders. CORE APPLICATION Program Header - Cover Page. ➢ Complete the indicated information for the requesting Organization. ➢ Complete requested information for thePZogr�m" to be funded. See specific Funder requirements for Program Funding Period. ➢ State the Priority Need Area to bem-ddr_e_s�sted in accordance with specific Funder requirements. ➢ Brief Description of the program should be as focused and brief as possible. This is the summary used to describ%your program. ➢ Complete financial and stat istlydata summary. +, Summary Report ➢ These numbers should not be duplicative of each other and should be a reasonable expectbition, given the size and scope of the program. ➢ The client figures;)and amounts used on this page must be consistent with those used later in the�'Narrative, Unduplicated Client Count, and Fiscal Sections of this application: ■ Summary of budget totals and request. ■ The estimated number of children to be served via individual services. ■ The estimated number of adults to be served via individual services. ■ The estimated number to be served via services in a group setting. Summary Report Funding Detail ➢ If the request has increased 5% or more, briefly explain why. The electronic signing of the application by either the Chief Board Officer and the Chief Professional Officer for the Organization is required. 135 Proposal Narrative Section A. Organization Capability Complete the narrative items as indicated in the directions for each block within the stated page length for Section A. Although the boxes will expand as you type, address that item as concisely as possible and stay within the one page limit requirement. Al refers to the overall Organization. A2 should reflect your organization and the areas of concern relating to the program in this application. Section B. Program Need Statements 131 When completing these sections, answer the questions as directly as possible. You are describing the specific unacceptable condition that is addressed by your program. Provide an accurate description of your target population. Provide data and references that this is a substantiated c6ndition or situation in our community. See specific Funder requirements Al B2 When completing this section, make sure that you have carefully reviewed and surveyed existing programs in the county. Col aboration is expected to better serve the community and fill existing gappsk n seg ices. Please identify other programs serving this priority need and explain=how your program will provide for additional services or serve additional clients. Unnecessary duplication of services is to be avoided. See specific FU nder requirements. Section C - Program Description �� Be as specific and understandable a5",s possible and focus on the indicated subject for each area. The end result of thissection is to have a comprehensive understanding of what your program will accomplish in the community and how you intend to achieve your results. 1V . C1 The priority need sted on the cover page is linked to this section. Do not enter anything, C2 Prograactivities and services description. ➢ Explain the activities, services, and general results to be provided by this program. ➢ Address the process and intended outcomes of the program. The reader should have a good understanding of client involvement from start/referral to finish/program exit. ➢ The expected outcomes and changes for the client and the community should be clearly stated. (Detailed Measurable Outcomes will be covered in Section D.) ➢ The client's choices, participation, and influence on service provision should be evident, as well as any cycle of activities that are program requirements. ➢ Follow up after exit from the program should be done to determine any long-term effect from activity involvement and impact from the program over time. This follow up should also be incorporated into program improvement efforts (Section G -Timetable). ➢ See specific Funder requirements. C3 Specifically address how the unacceptable condition from Section 131 will be reduced by the efforts of the program and involvement of the client. Describe 136 how your program follows a recognized "Best Practices" approach (see definition on page 9), and show how the proposed strategies or program components are effective with the targeted population. C4 Briefly describe the staffing requirements of the program. What skills and abilities are needed by the staff to make this program successful? Do you have specific people in mind for program staff? Information here should conform to that in the Position Listing on the Budget Narrative Worksheet. C5 Describe how you propose to make the target population aware of the availability of this program. How will you incorporate other community resources in this process? How will you promote the program? Do you have community/program partners with signed agreements that will help in this area? C6 What will you do to make the program accessible to the "population that you want to involve? What will attract the target population tq-lr program? What will keep them coming back? . qj Section D –Program Outcomes and Activities Matrix AN Outcome: In general, a program should have 3- og�m outcomes. The Outcome indicates the measurable impact or change the program will have on the clients its serves. The outcome should detail the results of thAervices provided, not the services provided. Outcomes utilize action words suchtaas maintain, increase, decrease, reduce, improve, raise and lower. Please incorporat3e the-fo lowing into the outcome description: 10,24 * Direction of change * Time frame * Area of change * As measured by * Target pr ulation * Degree of change * Baseline: the number you wild 6be measuring against Example Outcome:' To decrease (direction of vtan. ge) number of unexcused absences (area of change) of enrolled boys and girls f(fa get population) by 75% (degree of change) in one year (time frame) as reported�by"the-2015-16 School Board attendance records (as measured by). Baseline: 2015-1t2h, oil Board attendance records for enrolled boys and girls. Activities Matrix: The matrix is designed to identify specific activities the program will provide to achieve the stated outcomes. The matrix identifies: 1) the specific activity; 2) how often the service/activity is provided; 3) who, by position, is responsible to deliver the service/activity; and 4) expected change in client from providing service/activity. In addition, the matrix is designed to capture the evaluation of services provided: 5) indicator or measurement of change; 6) source of measurement; and 7) how frequently it is measured. A separate PROGRAM OUTCOMES AND ACTIVITIES MATRIX needs to be completed for each outcome. Use a separate row for each activity and group activities under their related outcomes. See examples provided at the end of these instructions. IMPORTANT NOTE: Keep in mind when developing PROGRAM OUTCOMES that, if funded, these will be what you are accountable to accomplish. Also, the PROGRAM 137 OUTCOMES should reflect the information described in the PROGRAM NEED STATEMENT (B.1.) All PROGRAM NEED STATEMENTS should flow from the MISSION & VISION. MEASURABLE OUTCOMES should be based on and measure program needs. Activities are the tasks you do to influence the outcome and impact the unacceptable condition in your PROGRAM NEED STATEMENT. 138 Program Outcomes and Activity Matrix EXAMPLES PROGRAM OUTCOME AND ACTIVITIES Outcome: Increase academic performance as measured by pre and post tests from Skills Bank software and/or grade point averages for 75% of participants attending at least one month in the program. Baseline: Skills Bank — Pre-test upon entering program; grade point average -first grading period Program Design & Task Management (Columns 1-4) Evaluation Design`s&ata Collection (Columns 5-7)� 1 2 3 4 7 Program Frequency Responsible Expected IndicatorData Time of Activities (how Parties Outcomes/change 1 Mt±asurements Source Measurement (what) often) (who) (why) `(evidence) (where) (when) Complete Five days Tutors Increase.a66demic Scores on Skills Bi -monthly academic a week for skills Skills Bank Bank training 1 hour per Qj software exercises on day Skills Banks Software Provide Five days Tutors( )increase in School grades Report 9 week assistance a week for `� academic Cards progress in 1 hour perperformance reports completing day homework Increase in Completed assignments" confidence to homework Daily log C1,complete school assignments I work V 139 PROGRAM OUTCOME AND ACTIVITIES Outcome: Maintain the reduction in risk factors (by at least one) for a period of one year, for 90% of the families who have successfully completed the program as measured by the risk assessment tool. Baseline for 04-05 was 100%. Program Design & Task Management Evaluation Design & Data Collection (Columns 1-4) (Columns 5-7) rroviae family z nours once a .)ociai worker increase in ramiry coping skills Q rrogress in counseling ramny files iwonimy counseling week for 12 weeks Resolve'family) Participation in issues counseling 140 PROGRAM OUTCOME AND ACTIVITIES Outcome: 85% of enrolled youth in the program for at least three months will not become involved with juvenile justice system as measured by reports obtained by DJJ every 6 months. Baseline: status of youth upon entering program Program Design & Task Management Evaluation Design & Data Collection (Columns 1-4) (Columns 5-7) 1 01 3 4 5 © 7 Program Frequency Responsible Expected Indicator Data Time of Activities (how Parties Outcomes/change Measurements Source Measurement (what) often) (who) (why) (evidence) (where) (when) Provide after 4 times a Program Increase in school Better grades ` Report Every 9 week school tutoring week for 1 hour Tutors grades and � cards grade report each attendance school session attend'a3ne Provide 1 time Guest Increase ability to C61m01e"tion of Client Weekly anger every other speaker— cope during pre/post test files (observation) management week for Counselor stressful or =fn'dicating sessions 1.5 hours from xyz confrontational, increase in Completed program situations Q) skills test (every other week) Staff observation Provide 5 times a Recreation Maintain active Consistent Sign -in Weekly review structured after school week for 2 hours specialist participation in � rogram that participation of youth in sheets of attendance roster recreationalMusic )provides a safe program for all activities Specialist alternative 5 days including music, Program recreation, direc.M and computers III 141 Section E - Collaboration Listing Your program is a part of the larger community, including home, neighborhood, and school, in which your clients live and function. Incorporate working with other organizations into your plan and make the best use of your combined resources. Plan these working relationships into your program with a clear understanding of what each program will bring into the process for the benefit of the clients being served. Your program resources are to benefit your community partners and the clients that they serve. Section F- Unduplicated Clients Location Section - Provide counts for last fiscal year, current fiscal year, and projected fiscal year for the program. The Location table requests information for the total number of unduplicated clients across the locations served by your program. The three sets of columns allow for entry of figures for the Last Fiscal Year (2015-16), the Current Fiscal Year (2016-17), and the Projections for the �' slcal Year for which you are applying (2017-18). This data allows for comparison between what was accomplished in the last complete year, what has occurreds lar in the current year, and what you expect to achieve in the coming year fol- hich you are requesting funds. See specific Funder requirements. While=yours, rogram may not serve more than one county, this table allows for data ery;by, programs that cover multiple locations. Please be as accurate as possible,widkhese figures, as the funders may require documentation. U Age Group Section - Provide counts�"for fast fiscal year, current fiscal year, and projected fiscal year for the program ., The Age Group Section is similar to the prior section and allows for entry of unduplicated client data blyr i diwiduais and by group for the same referenced timeframes. This data gentry allows the funder to see the population that you serve broken into both age groupings and by individual or group based services. The data for those served as in6 uals and by group services should not be duplicative. The Totals Servedjn both sections should match. The figures from these sections must be in agreement with those used on the Cover Page and in the other Narrative sections. Section G. FUNDER SPECIFIC SHEETS REMEMBER TO CHECK INDIVIDUAL FUNDER INSTRUCTIONS FOR ANY FURTHER REQUIREMENTS OR ADDITIONAL FORMS NECESSARY. This is the end of the program narrative section of the application. 142 DEFINITIONS OR KEY TERMS USED 1. Activities: Describes the tasks that will be accomplished in the program to achieve the results stated in the outcomes. Activities utilize action words such as complete, establish, create, provide, operate, and develop. The activities should reflect the services described in the Program Description. 2. Attachments: Documentation generated outside your organization (e.g. audit, collaborative letters, and support letters). 3. Best Practice: Programs (or Program Components) that have been proven by high quality research test to be effective in reducing known risk factors and enhancing protective factors to ensure successful achievement of goals. Replicated with integrity will provide same results in community. (see also Focus Areas for further definition) i 4. Client: An individual receivingdirect face-to-face service -E- from a program. �� P 9 5. Collaboration: Two or more organizations working together�,toward a common goal. There must be evidence of collaboration with other o ga iizations and programs in a way that promotes quality service delivery. Evidence -should include completion of written cooperative Contracts containing shared em asurable outcomes/objectives and detailed responsibilities. CJ 6. Needs Area: A human problem or condo', which has been identified as a major community concern. For example,a needs area is "Child Abuse and Neglect". A service or strategy designed to prevendihe problem of "Child Abuse and Neglect' is the provision of crisis counseling s /"._.,\� 7. New Program: An applicatioMGbmitted by an organization for new types of services which are not now beingprovided in the community or are not being provided by the organization and which3are identified in a needs area. 8. Outcomes: Dec ib`esw''hat you want to achieve with the target population. Indicates the results of the services you provide, not the services you provide. Outcomes utilize action words such as maintain, increase, decrease, reduce, improve, raise, and lower. 9. Priority Needs: Those areas of need, as identified by the Funder, as a priority to be supported by the Funder through the use of its funds or through technical assistance. REMEMBER TO CHECK INDIVIDUAL FUNDER INSTRUCTIONS FOR ANY FURTHER REQUIREMENTS OR ADDITIONAL FORMS 143 Other Resources: Grant Writing Tools for Non -Profit Organizations: www.npquides.com Non Profit Gateway: www.nonprofit.gov Free Florida and Federal Grants web site: www.freefedgrants.com Community Foundation Locator: www.communitvfoundationlocator.org/search/index.cfm Grants for Non -Profit Organizations: www.freegovmoney.net Daily Funding Updates, both Federal and Foundation: http://www.fundsnetservices.com/Donors/notices07.htm County Profiles: http://web.uflib.ufl.edu/fefdl/ Foundation Center: http://fdncenter.org/pnd/rfp/ 144 Organization Name: Executive Director: Address: Program Director: Address: PROGRAM COVER PAGE E-mail: Telephone: Fax: E-mail: Telephone: Fax: 145 SUMMARY REPORT Amount Requested from Funder for 2018/19: $ Total Proposed Program Budget for 2018/19: $ Percent of Total Program Budget: $ Current Program Funding (2017/18): $ Dollar increase/(decrease) in request: $ Percent increase/(decrease) in request Unduplicated Number of Children to be served Individually: $ Unduplicated Number of Adults to be served Individually: $ Unduplicated Number to be served via Group settings: $ Total Program Cost per Client: $ e Mi **If request increased 5% or more, briefly explain why: If these funds are being used to match another so , rce,,name the source and the $ amount: -v The Organization's Board of Directors has approved this application on: date Name of Preside nt/Chairr Jf e Board Signature or Executive Director/CP& 146 PROPOSAL NARRATIVE Please respond to each question in the allotted space for each section. A. ORGANIZATION CAPABILITY L Provide the mission statement and vision OT your organization. 2. Provide a brief summary of your organization including areas of expertise, accomplishments, and population served. B. PROGRAM NEED STATEMENT 1. What is the unacceptable condition requiring change? \, 2. Who has the need? ( or oy ,,rI.� 3. Where do they live?4rvovide local, state, or national trend data, with reference source, that corroborates that tbi' s ishan area of need. 4. Identify similar similarprograms that are currently serving the needs of your targeted population; Explain now tnese existing programs are underunder-serving the targeted population of your program. 147 C. PROGRAM DESCRIPTION 1. List Priority Needs area addressed. 2. Brieflv describe program activities including location of services v 3. Briefly describe how your program addresses the stated need/problern. Describe how your program follows a recognized "best practice" (see definition on�ge310 of the Instructions) and provide evidence that indicates proposed strategies are effective,with target population. "4 w 4. List staffing needed for your program, it week in program for each staff member afiA information in the Position Listing on the B 5. How will the to f� g ,equired experience and estimated hours per 51unteers (this section should conform to the Narrative Worksheet). be made aware of the r)roeram? 6. How will the program be accessible to target population (i.e., location, transportation, hours of operation)? 148 D. PROGRAM OUTCOMES AND ACTIVITIES MATRIX. 3 - 4 program outcomes only. One matrix table per outcome. Outcomes: In general, a program should have 3-4 program outcomes. The Outcome indicates the measurable impact or change the program will have on the clients it serves. The outcome should detail the results of the services provided, not the services provided. Outcomes utilize action words such as maintain, increase, decrease, reduce, improve, raise and lower. Please incorporate the following into the outcome description: * Direction of change * Time frame * Area of change * As measured by * Target population * Baseline: the number you will be measuring against * Degree of change a� o Example Outcome: To decrease (direction of change) number of unexcused-Zi,'Onces (area of change) of enrolled boys and girls (target population) by 75% (degree-,o�,change) in one year (timeframe) as reported by the 2017/18 School Board attendariceIecords (as measured by). Baseline: 2017/18 School Board attendance recordsfo enrolled boys and girls. Activities Matrix: The matrix is designed to identify specific activities the program will provide to achieve the stated outcomes. The4matrix-identifies: 1) the specific activity; 2) how often the service/activity is provided; 3) whop yaasi�tion, is responsible to deliver the service/activity; and 4) expected change in client from p oviding service/activity. In addition, the matrix is designed to capture the evaluation of seervics provided: 5) indicator or measurement of change; 6) source of measurement;,?pd 7 w frequently it is measured. A separate PROGRAM('OUTCOMES AND ACTIVITIES MATRIX needs to be completed for each outcome. Use asep4raiierow for each activity and group activities under their related outcomes. To add more roves, needed, simply locate the cursor at the last cell in the last row and press the "TAB" button on the keyboard. See examples provided in the instructions. IMPORTANT NOTE: Keep in mind when developing PROGRAM OUTCOMES that, if funded, these will be what you are accountable to accomplish. Also, the PROGRAM OUTCOMES should reflect the information described in the PROGRAM NEED STATEMENT (B.1.). All PROGRAM NEED STATEMENTS should flow from the MISSION & VISION. MEASURABLE OUTCOMES should be based on and measure program needs. Activities are the tasks you do to influence the outcome and impact the unacceptable condition in your PROGRAM NEED STATEMENT. (B.1.). 149 Outcome # 1: Program Design & Task Management (Columns 1-4) EvaluatioUesign & Data Collection (Columns ) 1 Program Activities (what) 2 Frequency (how often) 3 Responsible Parties (who) 4 Expected Outcomes/change (why) ,n Indicator M asurements (evidence) 6 Data Source (where) 7 Time of Measurement (when) v 150 Outcome # 2: Program Design & Task Management (Columns 1-4) Evaluation, Design & Data Collection (Colulm, l- ,sr5= ) 1 Program Activities (what) 2 Frequency 3 Responsible 4 Expected S Indicator 6 Data Source 7 Time of �� (how Parties (who) Outcomes/change (why)� Measurements (where) Measurement often) (evidence) (evidence) (when) C 10-1% 151 Outcome # 3: Program Design & Task Management (Columns 1-4) EvaluatioUesign & Data Collection 1 Program Activities (what) 2 Frequency 3 Responsible 4v:,'�nn Expected p ,dicator 6 Data Source 7 Time of (how Parties (who) Outcomes/change (why) asurements (where) Measurement often) ,� (evidence) (when) V 152 Outcome # 4: Program Design & Task Management (Columns 1-4) EvaluatioUesign & Data Collection (COlumrrs+5 7) 1 Program Activities (what) 2 Frequency 3 Responsible 4 Expected . N NV, Indicator 6 Data Source 7 Time of � (how Parties (who) Outcomes/change (why) �U Measurements (where) Measurement often) ,/� (evidence) (when) �I v 153 E. COLLABORATION 1. List your program's collaborative partners and the resources that they are providing to the program beyond referrals and support. (See individual funder requirements for inclusion of collaborative agreement letters.) (NOTE: COLLABORATIVE AGREEMENT LETTERS ARE NOT REQUIRED BY ANY OF THE UNITED WAYS USING THIS CORE APPLICATION.) Collaborative Agency Resources provided to the program • k A �t A Nr 154 F. UNDUPLICATED CLIENTS Location Last FY Actual 2016/17 Current FY Budget 2017/2018 Current FY Budget 2017/2018 Fellsmere 0 to 4 (Preschool) ,. �X Sebastian Gifford/Wabasso Central Vero 11 to 14 (Middle) South County/Highlands/ Oslo z4 •�� Unknown e)) Number of Un4pliclted Clients by Age Location Last FY Actual 2016/1 Individuals (��Group Current Current FY Budget 2017/2018 Individuals Group Current FY Budget 2017/2018 Individuals Group 0 to 4 (Preschool) ,. �X 5 to 10 (elementary)' 11 to 14 (Middle) ` �� 15 to 18 (High School Total Children 19 to 59 (adults) 60+ (seniors) Total Adults Total Served 155 G. H. FUNDER SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS — refer to Funder Specific Request For Proposal instructions. BUDGET FORMS — The budget forms are in a separate Excel file named "CSAC 2018-2019 Budget Forms". Refer to instructions for opening and completing this file. In the Excel file you will find the following worksheet tabs: 1. Budget Narrative Worksheet— Part One 2. Budget Narrative Worksheet —Part Two 3. Total Agency Budget 4. Total Program Budget 5. Total Funder Specific Budget 6. Explanation for Variances o 156 2018/19 BUDGET APPLICATION INSTRUCTIONS The budget forms for the 2018/19 application are in a separate MS Excel file named "CSAC 2018-19 Budget Forms". Name Instructions: Edit the Header on "Total Agency" tab by inputting Agency Name in Cell C7 and the Program Name in Cell C8. This will populate all other tabs automatically. ENTER ALL NUMBERS IN WHOLE DOLLARS ONLY! ARRATIVE WORKSHEET - PA NOTE: DO THIS WORKSHEET FIRST!] Work entered here will automatically transfer to other worksheets. Column Descriptions: The purpose of the Budget Narrative Worksheets is to provide detail'to justify the amount requested and posted in each line item of the budget for your program rom this worksheet, your figures will be linked to the Total Agency Budget — Column, C�'',d Total Program Budget — Column C and the Total Funder Specific Budget. CAUTION: Do not enter any figures or formulas where�a�{I is colored in dark blue. The dark blue print indicates that formulas and/or links are ih!PlAce. Column A: This column should show �the r' osed Total Program Budget. This column is linked to Total Pr, ogram Budget Form — Column C. Column B: This column shouldsh' ow��the Proposed Total Funder Specific Budget. This column is linked to�,`fotal Funder Specific Budget Form. Column C: This columnuldvshow the Proposed Total Agency Budget. This column will be li`-ked to Total Agency Budget Form —Column C. BUDGET NARRATIVE WORKSHEET - PART ONE Part One contains the Revenues Section" — Lines 1 through 22 and "Salaries and Fringe Benefits" — Lines 24 through 26. Sources of revenue (Lines 1 — 22) must be entered manually in the columns as indicated above. Totals for Salaries (Line 24) will be automatically transferred from the Salaries Detail Section which begins on Worksheet Line 41. Include all positions on page two of Part One applicable to the program, with the remaining positions summarized in the Remaining Positions line at bottom of table. Totals for Fringe Benefit costs (Lines 25 — 26) will be automatically transferred into the appropriate line items for the Employee Benefits and Payroll Taxes. 157 BUDGET NARRATIVE WORKSHEET — PART TWO (2nd worksheet tab) NOTE: DO THIS WORKSHEET AFTER COMPLETING PART ONE., As with Part One, work entered here will automatically transfer to other worksheets. Part Two contains the "General Expenditures Section" — Lines 27 through 47. The format provides for entering information about different expenses within a given line item as noted below. Note that the details included in this narrative apply to the Program Budget only. Column 1: A narrative description — a brief explanation of the item(s) and its use. Column 2: A calculation narrative for each expense within line item. Column 3: Manually enter the total program expense for eac item listed. Column 4: Manually enter the total funder specific expen�ferior each item listed. Column 5: Manually enter a total for the Agency fo othisaline item. NOTE: The line item totals for the pro jram�(Column 3), the funder specific expenses (Column 4) and for=the a"jency (Column 5) will automatically link to other budget workshedts. }j EXAMPLE for Line Item 41 & Training: Column 1: a) state conference �auto �travel; b) state conference registration; c) state confer�encei�'otel & per diem Column 2: a) Orlando conference @ 250 miles @ 48.5 cents/mile; b) 2 @ $250; c) 2 rooms (cA2 n hts x $150/room Column 3: a) $122, b)�$,00; c) $600 Column 4: Whatever portion of Column 3 you want the specific funder to pay for Column 5: Whatevert e total Travel, Conferences & Training is for the AGENCY 158 TOTAL AGENCY BUDGET (3rd worksheet tab) and TOTAL PROGRAM BUDGET (4th worksheet tab) Column Descriptions: The five columns of the Total Agency Budget and the Total Program Budget are to provide historical, current, and proposed budget information regarding the program. Column A: This column should show the actual amounts received and expended for the last full fiscal year that has passed. (These are usually audited figures.) Column B: This column should show the budgeted amounts for the current fiscal year (complete year, no partial periods) Do not leave any cells blank, rather enter a zero (0) if you have not budgeted certain revenues or expenses. Q�, Column C: Unless you skipped the Budget Narrative Wofksk�eet, this column will automatically show the budgeted projecti6ns.& next fiscal year—the year for which this application is being sub,�t�d. Column D: This column will automatically cal�culaate he percentage increase from the current fiscal year budget (Colur n� B-) to the next fiscal year budget (Column D). C) TOTAL FUNDER SPECIFJC,B DGET (5t" worksheet tab) ..�� The Agency Name, Program Name anh,Funder information at top of this budget form, along with all other data in the form will SA-Atically be transferred from the other worksheets. VARIANCES EXPLANATION (6t" worksheet tab) The Funders are c�oncefh,,ed with the rising costs of service provision. Dwindling state resources are resAlhg A increasing requests to local funding sources. The Funders are requesting more explanation and justification for program request increases. Completion of the Total Program and Funder Specific Budget sheets will automatically generate information on increases from the prior year. Any increase of 15% or more will require an explanation to be entered for that line item on the Variances Explanation worksheet. All line items with such a percentage will automatically have those line item labels listed on the Variances Explanation worksheet. CHART OF ACCOUNTS NOTE: This application is intended for use by multiple funders. Not all line items apply to all funders. Check individual funder specifications for exceptions. 159 Revenue Descriptions: Note: If funds are received from a source not listed, enter the amount in line 17 "Other' and provide an explanation in the narrative. 1-3 Children's Services Councils: Amounts received from the named Children's Services Councils. 4-6 United Ways: Amounts received from the named United Ways. 7 County Funds: Amounts received from local county governments. Please list the source counties in the budget narrative. 8 Department of Children and Families: Amounts received from the Department of Children and Families. 9 Other State of Florida Grant Funds: Amounts received from State agencies other than DCF. 10 Other Federal Grant Funds: Amounts received from Federal agencies. 11 Grants for funding Capital Expenditures: Amounts for capital expenditures and not for program expenses. 12 Contributions -Cash: Amounts received from cash contributions 13 Legacies and Bequests: An unrestricted planned giftoor'ndowment available for operating expenses. 14 Membership Dues: Amounts received for memberships!inNthe organization. 15 Program Fees: Fees received from customers for services provided by the program. 16 Fund Raising Events -Net: Net proceeds from special -fund raising events conducted by the program. Show details of each event in, the budget narrative to include for each event: Gross Revenues Expenses Net Proceeds� 17 Funds from Other Sources: Amo Tats -provided not includable in other lines above. If this line exceeds 10% of Total Reven`Ues, specify sources in the Variances Explanation tab for this line item 18 Sales to Public -Net: Net proce♦ d"s from sales of publications, supplies, and other items to the public. Show details 'drach type of sale in the budget narrative to include for each type of sale: Gross Revenues Ex�enses �,VN rProceeds 19 Investment Income: Interest, dividends, rentals, endowment earnings, and Royalties on any type of investment. All investment income, regardless of type and origin, should be reported here. 20 Miscellaneous: Funds not pertaining to any other revenue accounts listed (e.g., Cost of Goods Sold). 21 Reserve Funds Used for Operating: Funds taken from the reserve fund balance to provide for a balanced budget/offset a deficit budget. 22 In-kind Donations: Value of services provided by the operating agency/program to support program operation. These should be included for those in-kind services and donations that relate to expenditures included as an offset and permissible under audit and Form 990 presentations. Do not include value for volunteers. 23 TOTAL: Add lines 1 through 22 for total agency and program revenue. Expenditure Descriptions: 24 Salaries: All program salaries including full-time, part-time, and temporary staff. 160 25 Employee Benefits: Include employer's share of retirement benefits and life/health insurance benefits. Indicate percentage used to calculate retirement benefits. 26 Payroll Taxes: Include employer's share of Social Security taxes (7.65%), Workers Compensation, and Florida Unemployment taxes. FICA should not be calculated for contract employees. 27 Administrative Costs: The costs associated with the administration of the program but not directly associated with client service. Administrative salaries should be included in this line item. Administrative costs should not duplicate any other costs. The calculation of this cost should be detailed in the budget narrative. Administrative costs are limited in dollar amount or percentage of total budget by some funders. Check individual funder specifications for limitations. 28 Advertising: Costs related to advertising for positions and/or volunteers. This advertising line item is not for fund-raising advertising. 29 Audit Expense: Costs related to the expense of the annual independent audit. Only the share of the costs that apply to the funded program should be budgeted. 30 Books/Educational Materials: Materials used in the program as an educational tool for the clients (i.e., books, reading materials, games, puzzles, videoetc.). 31 Equipment Rental & Maintenance: The cost of renting and' maintaining equipment including copiers, computers, typewriters, etc. 32 Food & Nutrition: Meals and nourishing snacks provided to clients during program operation. � 33 Insurance: General liability, property, business,.aGto; inland marine, crime bond, and directors and officers liability insurance. N 34 Occupancy (Building & Grounds): All costsrel�ed to the program's place of residence. Includes rent (building and land), morftgage, contracted janitorial and maintenance services, real estate property taxes,fandacupancy related licenses and permits. The details of this budget line item shod Re, provided in the budget narrative. 35 Office Supplies: All supplies and materials used by the program to include office, AK program, and housekeeping supplies. 36 Postage/Shipping: Postage11(,pacel post, commercial trucking, and other delivery services. .e. 37 Printing & Publications:��Includes cost of brochures, videos, and other informational materials. Does n l,( cNd a the cost of renting a copy machine. 38 Specific Assistance..61lndividuals: Expenses for specific materials, appliances, rental and utility subsidies`and any other assistance rendered to clients. 39 Subscriptions, bugs, Memberships: Costs for the purchase of professional periodicals necessary for maintaining information related to the program. Cost of individual or organization dues relevant to the functions of the program. This line item should include payments to national parent organizations. The details of this budget line should be provided in the budget narrative to identify periodicals and memberships and their individual costs. 40 Telephone: Expenses for all telephone services. 41 Travel/Conferences/Training: Travel related costs including conferences and seminar registrations, hotels, meals, airfare, per diem, and lodging. Meals are reimbursed at the funders rate per 24-hour day: breakfast, $x; lunch, $x; and dinner, $x. The details of this budget line item should be provided in the budget narrative. 42 Travel -Daily: Mileage costs associated with the daily operation of the program. Mileage is reimbursed at the rate per mile set by the funder. 43 Utilities: Costs for power, water, sewer, gas, and waste removal (not housekeeping). 161 44 Other/Miscellaneous: Specific program related costs not reportable on any other line item (i.e., background checks, volunteer testing, etc.). 45 Professional Fees: Fees and charges of professional practitioners, technical consultants, or semi-professional technicians, who are not employees of the program and are engaged as independent contractors for specified services on a fee or other individual contractual basis. This line item would include attorney or consultant fees. Contracted janitorial, maintenance, and repair services related to buildings and grounds should be included in line 33 "Occupancy". 47 Equipment Purchases: Equipment purchased as a necessary item for the operation of a program, either by the capital expenditure funding on line 11 or by Agency resources. Equipment is defined as tangible property having a useful life of one year or more and, typically, an acquisition cost of $500 or more. 162 DEFINITIONS OR KEY TERMS USED Activities: Describes the tasks that will be accomplished in the program to achieve the results stated in the outcomes. Activities utilize action words such as complete, establish, create, provide, operate, and develop. The activities should reflect the services described in the Program Description. 2. Attachments: Documentation generated outside your organization (e.g. audit, collaborative letters, and support letters). 3. Best Practice: Programs (or Program Components) that have been proven by high quality research test to be effective in reducing known risk factors and enhancing protective factors to ensure successful achievement of goals. Replicated with integrity will provide same results in community. (see also Focus Areas for further definition) 4. Client: An individual receivingdirect face-to-face services froA— Nro ram. 9 5. Collaboration: Two or more organizations working togl her toward a common goal. There must be evidence of collaboration with otherqW ganizations and programs in a way that promotes quality service delivery. E ide should include completion of written cooperative Contracts containing shared measurable outcomes/objectives and detailed responsibilities. r A 6. Needs Area: A human problem or c mdi t n, which has been identified as a major community concern. Forexample needs area is "Child Abuse and Neglect". A service or strategy designed to prevent problem of "Child Abuse and Neglect" is the provision of crisis counseling. 7. New Program: An applicat onosubmitted by an organization for new types of services which are not now behg�p�rovided in the community or are not being provided by the organization and wh 0hA*re identified in a needs area. 8. Outcomes: Descr�+fjes/what you want to achieve with the target population. Indicates the results of theservices you provide, not the services you provide. Outcomes utilize action words such as maintain, increase, decrease, reduce, improve, raise, and lower. 9. Priority Needs: Those areas of need, as identified by the Funder, as a priority to be supported by the Funder through the use of its funds or through technical assistance. REMEMBER TO CHECK INDIVIDUAL FUNDER INSTRUCTIONS FOR ANY FURTHER REQUIREMENTS OR ADDITIONAL FORMS 163 2: 21 2! 2( 21 21 2! 3( 3' 3: 3: 3� 3! 3( X 3! 3! 4( 41 4: 4: 49 4! 4( 41 4f 41 2018-19 CORE GRANT APPLICATION TOTAL AGENCY BUDGET If Agency is the same as Progam, check box and do not complete this page. If Agency is submitting more than one program, check box and prepare only one time. AGENCY NAME: Agency Name Here PROGRAM NAME: Program Name Here REVENUES FY 16-17 FY 17.18 FY 18-19 FYE FYE FYE A B C ACTUAL TOTAL PROPOSED PROJECTED ACTUAL BUDGETED % INCREASE CURRENT VS. NEXT FY BUDGET D (col. Ccol. Bycol. B Children Services Advisory Committee -Indian River 0 Children's Services Council -St. Lucie 0 Children's Services Council -Martin 0 United Way -St. Lucie County 0 United Way -Martin County 0 United Way -Indian River County 0 Other Counties Funding other than above 0 Department of Children & Families A 0 Other State of Florida Grant Funds \ 0 Other Federal Grant Funds `�\\ ,v 0 Grants for funding Capital Ex enditures ^ 0 Contributions -Cash 4\ .L �! 0 Legacies & Bequests 0 Membership Dues \1 0 Pro ram Fees 0 Fund Raising Events -Net % 1 0 Funds from Other Sources (Specify if > 10% of total) 0 Sales to Public -Net 0 Investment Income 0 Miscellaneous — \\ I' 0 Reserve Funds Used for Operating 1( , ' 0 In -Kind Donations must be from audit or 990 and t\ /1 0 support expenditures as included below f (- 0 TOTAL '( 11 0 0 0 EXPENDITURES Salaries 0 Em to ment Benefits 0 Payroll Taxes 0 Administrative Costs (( 0 Advertising 0 Audit Expense J/\, 0 Books/Educational MaterialsX .. ((-4 0 Equipment: Rental & Maintehainie 0 Food & Nutrition \\ )t _ 0 Insurance 0 Occupancy (Building & Grounds 0 Office Supplies 0 Posta e/Shipping 0 Printing & Publications 0 Specific Assistance to Individuals 0 Subscription/Dues/Memberships or Telephone 0 Travel/Conferences/Training 0 Travel -Daily 0 Utilities 0 Other/Miscellaneous 0 Professional Fees (Legal, Consulting) 0 TOTAL OPERATING EXPENDITURES 0 0 0 Equipment Purchases:Ca ital Expense 0 TOTAL 0 0 0 REVENUES OVER/ UNDER EXPENDITURES 01 01 0 164 2: 2, 2 21 2' 21 21 31 3' 3: X 3, 3 31 3'' 31 31 41 4' 4; 4: 4, 4! 41 4'. 4i 41 2018-19 CORE GRANT APPLICATION TOTAL PROGRAM BUDGET AGENCY NAME: Agency Name Here PROGRAM NAME: Program Name Here REVENUES FY 16.17 FY 17-18 FY 18-19 FYE FYE FYE A B C ACTUAL TOTAL PROPOSED PROJECTED ACTUAL BUDGETED %INCREASE CURRENT VS. NEXT FY BUDGET D (col. C -col. Bycol. B Children Services Advisory Committee -Indian River 0 Children's Services Council -St. Lucie 0 Children's Services Council -Martin 0 United Way -St. Lucie County 0 United Way -Martin County 0 United Way -Indian River County 0 Other Counties Funding other than above 0 Department of Children & Families 0 Other State of Florida Grant Funds 0 Other Federal Grant Funds 0 Grants for funding Capital Exenditures 0 Contributions-Cash\Q 0 Legacies & Bequests `�� 0 Membership Dues p f f A 0 Program Fees \\ ``=� 0 Fund Raising Events -Neth A 0 Funds from Other Sources (Specify if > 10% of total 61 -zj 0 Sales to Public -Net 0 Investment Income `C /L-..� 0 Miscellaneous 0 Reserve Funds Used for Operating fs' " 0 In -Kind Donations must be from audit or 990 and Cl 1 0 support expenditures as included below 101:04 r. TOTAL I 11 0 0 0 w EXPENDITURES (: Salaries V, // 0 Employment Benefits 0 Payroll Taxes �`�, 0 Administrative Costs ((, 0 Advertising 0 Audit Expense A Vf, 0 Books/Educational Materials 0 Equipment: Rental & Maintenanc!L V 0 Food & Nutrition G ` �' 0 Insurance ^.\� 0 Occupancy Buildin !&,Grourids 0 Office Supplies 0 Posta e/Shipping 0 Printing & Publications 0 Specific Assistance to Individuals 0 Subscription/Dues/Memberships 0 Telephone 0 Travel/Conferences/Training 0 Travel -Daily 0 Utilities 0 Other/Miscellaneous 0 Professional Fees (Legal, Consulting) 0 TOTAL OPERATING EXPENDITURES 0 0 0 E ui ment Pur chases:Ca ital Expense 0 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 01 01 0 REVENUES OVERT UNDER EXPENDITURES 01 0 0 165 24 2e 2( 27 2( Z 3( 31 31 3' 3� 3! 3( 31 3( 3f 4( 41 41 4: 44 4'. 4( 47 4( 2018-19 CORE GRANT APPLICATION FUNDER SPECIFIC BUDGET PROGRAM EXPENSES AGENCY NAME: Agency Name Here PROGRAM NAME: Program Name Here A B C FY 18-19 FY 18-19 TOTAL FUNDER PROGRAM SPECIFIC BUDGET BUDGET % OF TOTAL VS. FUNDER REQUEST (col. B/col. A) EXPENDITURES Salaries 0 0 #DIV/0! Employment Benefits 0 0 #DIV/01 Payroll Taxes 0 �_ 0 #DIV/0! Administrative Costs 0 0 #DIV/0! Advertising ��,� Q 0 #DIV/0! Audit Expense �0 0 #DIV/0! Books/Educational Materials �� 0 0 #DIV/0! Equipment: Rental & Maintenance._ 0 0 #DIV/0! Food & Nutrition 0 0 #DIV/O! Insurance 0 0 #DIV/0! Occupancy (Building & Grounds) ,� 0 0 #DIV/0! Office Supplies ` �� 0 0 #DIV/0! Postage/Shipping/` .__ 0 0 #DIV/0! Printing & Publications s 0 0 #DIV/0! Specific Assistance to Individuals _ ie1� 0 0 #DIV/0! Subscription/Dues/Memberships 0 0 #DIV/0! Telephone 0 0 #DIV/0! Travel/Conferences/Training 0 0 #DIV/0! Travel -Daily 00 0 0 #DIV/0! Utilities�� 0 0 #DIV/O! Other/Miscellaneous 0 0 #DIV/0! Professional Fees (Legal, Consulting) 0 0 #DIV/0! TOTAL OPERATING EXPENDITURES 0 0 #DIV10! Equipment Purchases:Capital Expense 0 0 #DIV/0! TOTAL EXPENDITURES 0 0 #DIV/o! 166 2018-19 CORE GRANT APPLICATION BUDGET NARRATIVE WORKSHEET - PART ONE Revenues: Line 1 - 20 & Salaries/Fringes: Lines 21 - 26 IMPORTANT: The Budget Narrative should provide details to justify the amount requested in each line item of the budget for your program. From this worksheet, your figures will be linked to the Total Agency Budget, Total Program Budget and Funder Specific Budget. AGENCY: Agency Name Here PROGRAM NAME: _ _ _ _ P_rog_ram Name _Here _ _ _ I i�U i1�,; Do not enter anrr f aures where a cell is colored in dark blue _Formulas and/or links are in place ...... 1 2 3 4 5 s 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 1E 17 1E 19 2C 21 27 23 24 2E 25 25 2E 2E Children Services Advisory Committee -Indian River 40 3�` Children's Services Council -St. Lucie C Children's Services Council -Martin 1\ `\ United Way -St. Lucie County __1146 United Way -Martin Count United Way -Indian River Count � Other Counties Funding (other than above) \ Department of Children & Families 0 Other State of Florida Grant Funds Other Federal Grant Funds Grants for funding Capital Expenditures Contributions -Cash Legacies & Bequests Membership Dues Program Fees `\ Fund Raising Events -Net Funds from Other Sources (Specify if > 10% of total)\ Sales to Public -Net Investment Income \\" Miscellaneous nil Reserve Funds Used for Operating -"A In -Kind Donations must be from audit�o`r990 and support expenditures as inclutledr6elow TOTAL REVENUES 0 0 0 167 B C EXPENDITURES Proposed Program Budget Funder Specific Total Agency Budget Budget Salaries - (must complete chart on next page) 0 0 0 FICA - Total salaries x 0.0765 Retirement - Annual pension for qualified staff Life/Health - Medical/Dental/Short-term Disab. Workers Compensation - # employees x rate Florida Unemployment - 9 projected employees x x RT -6 rate 167 SALARIES POSITION LISTING Position Title/ Total Hrs/wk I Gross Annual Salary (Agency) H Portion of Salary on 111 Proposed Funder Specific Budget Program IV %of Gross Annual Salary Requested(CIA) Example: Executive DirectorlOhrs 70,000.00 10,000.00 5,000.00 7.14% #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! ((/ ♦j #DIV/0! #DIV/0! Remaining positions throughout the agency Total Salaries ,�'' 0 `� 0 0 #DIV/0! 168 2018-19 CORE GRANT APPLICATION BUDGET NARRATIVE WORKSHEET - PART TWO General Expenditures: Lines 27- 47 IMPORTANT: The Budget Narrative should provide details to justify the amount requested in each line item of the budget for your program. From this worksheet, your figures will be linked to the Total Agency Budget and Total Program Budget. AGENCY NAME: PROGRAM NAME: Agency Name Here Program Name Here �••------------ ----- ----- .. - -- •- -----� CAUTION: Do not enter any figures where a cell is colored in dark blue --Formulas & links are in place. ' L..... —......................................................................................... J 27 EXPENDITURE LINE ITEM: ADMINISTRATIVE COSTS EXPENDITURE LINE ITEM: ADVERTISING Col. 1 - Description of Expense for the Program Budget Col. 3 - TOTAL Col. 4 - TOTAL Col. 2 - Calculation Narrative for the PROGRAM AMOUNT FUNDERSPECIFIC AMOUNT Program Budget Col. 5 - TOTAL AGENCY AMOUNT a the Program i► program Budget AMOUNT Expense for the Program Col. 2 - Calculation Narrative forlhe Program Budget`s b • r r Budget a `"fir 11,'' •.,iIt 10'41' e c Y f d__� Line Item TOTAL N "`a'`iid n �: i r}.. " ��a� .k« a�°�'�+`r�-t�N,� ,u'.'i�a:�:�' �'xl�'�k=ac�+.:;:z ,�<,� .,F --NN `t" 0 0 7 �. -.,r ': 01 28 EXPENDITURE LINE ITEM: ADVERTISING Col. 1 - Description of Col. 3 - TOTAL Col. 4 - TOTAL Col. 5 - TOTAL Col. 1 - Description ofCol. 3 - TOTAL ')PROGRAMAMOUNT Col. 4 - TOTAL Col. 5 - TOTAL FUNDER the Program i► program Budget AMOUNT Expense for the Program Col. 2 - Calculation Narrative forlhe Program Budget`s SPECIFIC AGENCY AMOUNT AMOUNT • r r Budget a `"fir 11,'' •.,iIt 10'41' Y.2 c Y a+ �., s+X: 5'sS*✓J,4.%3,'.i+l:'.,x,'ii{,' d__� Line Item TOTAL;•,r..�•.i�7 Line Item TOTAL 7 �. -.,r ': 01 0 29 EXPENDITURE LINE ITEM: IA!JITw Col. 1 - Description of Col. 3 - TOTAL Col. 4 - TOTAL Col. 5 - TOTAL Col. 3 - TOTAL Col. 2 - Calculation Narrative for the PROGRAM AMOUNT Program Budget Col:%2,- Calculation Narrative for the PROGRAM AMOUNT FUNDER SPECIFIC AGENCY AMOUNT Expense for ati the Program i► program Budget AMOUNT Budget • r r b Line Item TOTAL." 0 0 -rte 30 EXPENDITURE LINE ITEM: BOOKS/EDUCATIONAL MATERIALS Col. 1 - Description of Expense for the Program Budget Col. 3 - TOTAL Col. 2 - Calculation Narrative for the PROGRAM AMOUNT Program Budget Col. 4 - TOTAL Col. 5 - TOTAL FUNDER SPECIFIC AGENCY AMOUNT AMOUNT ati Line Item TOTAL;•,r..�•.i�7 0 0 169 31 EXPENDITURE LINE ITEM: EQUIPMENT: RENTAL & MAINTENANCE COI. 1 - Description of\�, Expense for the Program Budget Col. 1 - Description of Col. 3 - TOTAL 'Col. 4 - TOTAL Col. 5 - TOTAL Col. 4 - TOTAL Col. 5 - TOTAL Expense foe the Program Col. 2 - Calculation Narrative for the PROGRAM AMOUNT FUNDER SPECIFIC AGENCY AMOUNT PROGRAM AMOUNT Budget Program Budget AMOUNT Program Budget ��.e�llFk'i?lt"'t1 AMOUNT a b V i MI10010" t' rffil w,,' �0 atkN�ij`.';tl t k`kt c 01 0 4�1'Rtk ;kc"tt13Vi tii d C tt�tttst 11�i A i�OTOR.�i!1�" e �� Itlit:}��iikteFi4�.i#it:iti?111^I�llitikt d ta: tt 4. �!�r�'t�kttl�RHINE f. *4 00,W11WWN1�it15t e Line Item TOTAL.„:. . ., , .t , 0 0 32 EXPENDITURE LINE ITEM: FOOD & NUTRITION EXPENDITURE LINE ITEM: INSURANCE COI. 1 - Description of\�, Expense for the Program Budget Col. 1 -Description of Col. 5 - TOTAL AGENCY AMOUNT Col. 3 - TOTAL Col. 4 - TOTAL Col. 5 - TOTAL A ( 1{ Expense for the Program Col. 2 - Calculation Narrative for the PROGRAM AMOUNT FUNDER SPECIFIC AGENCY AMOUNT �;�itt1t 'NkYt�Ya`�'.'t?U1it�t1!}hi«41'.t1it14t'i�i1�.i1 Budget Program Budget ��.e�llFk'i?lt"'t1 AMOUNT a V i MI10010" t' rffil w,,' �0 e13''s�t b 01 0 4�1'Rtk fttrlil 011.00" h� at}4t it C tt�tttst Line Item TOTAL �� Itlit:}��iikteFi4�.i#it:iti?111^I�llitikt d *4 00,W11WWN1�it15t e tiitP}"N7quil�i��Hk� f Line Item TOTAL 0%10210WIN�ii1R t• it° s+: t' •' i n i axi`1„1� i 1 �4ni�t Y i�i�1i 1F i r e _ 1 0 0 33 EXPENDITURE LINE ITEM: INSURANCE COI. 1 - Description of\�, Expense for the Program Budget Col. 3 -TOTAL Col. 4 - TOTAL Col. 2 -*Calculation Narrative for ttfe� PROGRAM AMOUNT FUNDER SPECIFIC Program Budget AMOUNT Col. 5 - TOTAL AGENCY AMOUNT a A ( 1{ 9 yq $n }} AMt�${atf�fi;fitlifilitriµl4tdj{ti4�C,i� b �� ;�itt1t 'NkYt�Ya`�'.'t?U1it�t1!}hi«41'.t1it14t'i�i1�.i1 C ` ��.e�llFk'i?lt"'t1 tVlrt`�ilNVY.VnIS:l.11t1M1%Vi d V i MI10010" t' rffil w,,' �0 e13''s�t Line Item TOTAL 01 0 4�1'Rtk Ir�1\\1 34 EXPENDITURE LINE.ITEM: OCCl7PANCY BUILDINGS & GROUNDS Col. 1 - Description of Expense for the Program Budget .f k V Col. 3 - TOTAL Col. 2--�Calculation Narrative for the PROGRAM AMOUNT `� _ e or�gram Budget Col. 4 - TOTAL Col. 5 - TOTAL FUNDER SPECIFIC AGENCY AMOUNT AMOUNT a. d ipg�y1t,,xi',tt k��a31��5 b �� `Nk \�]�� itk'.i_tk{t'tkjkln5{,t�,t4!jik�+a[f6`SiSs1i C ` F/1:ir tVlrt`�ilNVY.VnIS:l.11t1M1%Vi d V iti!t"tk?t1Y�1�h e13''s�t 4�1'Rtk fttrlil tt�tttst Line Item TOTAL 0 0 35 EXPENDITURE LINE ITEM: OFFICE SUPPLIES COI. 1 - Description Of. Expense for the Program Budget Col. 3 - TOTAL Col. 2 - Calculation Narrative for the PROGRAM AMOUNT Program Budget Col. 4 - TOTAL Col. 5 - TOTAL FUNDER SPECIFIC AGENCY AMOUNT AMOUNT a jan �utlkk: jai b u r.n C MMEMORIESlk` ) d i`ftl��i�k�if{4`•':pN:�jatku'4�t'�3h'[t`ttt9tl?kcit.t�j�t(i�i�� e f Line Item TOTALi��k`il""�iirV-?iti;31�;;ral�in1taF�tSttH 0 0 170 36 EXPENDITURE LINE ITEM: POSTAGE/SHIPPING EXPENDITURE LINE ITEM: PRINTING & PUBLICATIONS Col. 1 - Description of Col. 3 - TOTAL Col. 4 - TOTAL Col. 5 - TOTAL Col. 4 - TOTAL Col. 5 - TOTAL Col. 2 - Calculation Narrative for the PROGRAM AMOUNT FUNDER SPECIFIC AGENCY AMOUNT Expense forthe Program Program Budget AMOUNT Budget ,�N41i�'t;tttp��`.tynl'�r"asyllt+ti AMOUNT a t: bartat! d bt�r��tuSf%µXrSit��t c a@,� 11'�i1�'aa�{ k�r�F`�M101 C ! f1 . Line Item TOTAL1i�ili aii� nti1`uiM "L�"1�ii4Y�t �u r{rkfjF 0 0 37 EXPENDITURE LINE ITEM: PRINTING & PUBLICATIONS Col. 1 - Description of Col. 3 - TOTAL Col. 4 - TOTAL Col. 5 - TOTAL a;','tislit Expense for the Program Col. 2 - Calculation Narrative for the PROGRAM AMOUNT FUNDER SPECIFIC AGENCY AMOUNT b Program Budget Budget ,�N41i�'t;tttp��`.tynl'�r"asyllt+ti AMOUNT a t: ttt�i,'3{�tsth i {10, HINkt':Y'S9114;1, d bt�r��tuSf%µXrSit��t V a@,� Ed C ! f1 . f d �i .i' - u�tis'ti:liit'i�` i;1{?i;itlN"t1 Line Item TOTAL 01:t, 0 ��j 0 38 EXPENDITURE LINE ITEM: SPECIFIC ASSISTANCE TO INDIVIDUALS EXPENDITURE LINE ITEM: TELEPHONE Col. 1 - Description of Expense for the Program Budget Col. 3 -TOTAL~ Col. 4 - TOTAL Col. 2 - Calculation Narrative for the PROGR� OUNT FUNDER SPECIFIC Program Budget AMOUNT Col. 5 - TOTAL AGENCY AMOUNT a;','tislit .ZN\ {tt i1�1 b ,�N41i�'t;tttp��`.tynl'�r"asyllt+ti Program Budget ' C t: ttt�i,'3{�tsth i {10, HINkt':Y'S9114;1, d bt�r��tuSf%µXrSit��t V n�t�ix{ru nbi1� e C ! f1 i1'�rrriltafFstzs_,58H:�niS:1;7"� f d �i .i' aGdtl4t�{tlntaui i;1{?i;itlN"t1 Line Item TOTALfiww 0 0 01 \�I 39 EXPENDITURE LINE ITEM: SUBSCRIPTION/DUES/MEMBERSHIPS EXPENDITURE LINE ITEM: TELEPHONE Col. 1 - Description of1" Expense for the Program Budget Col. 3 - TOTAL COI. 2 - Calctlatlon Narrative for the PROGRAM AMOUNT Program Budget Col. 4 - TOTAL Col. 5 - TOTAL FUNDER SPECIFIC AGENCY AMOUNT AMOUNT a .ZN\ Col. 2 - Calculation Narrative for the PROGRAM AMOUNT FUNDER SPECIFIC AGENCY AMOUNT Budget Program Budget ' C Styi,nii'+{`t.Tlt�:115:i�utili d bt�r��tuSf%µXrSit��t V n�t�ix{ru nbi1� e C f d �'ti'{ 111t� rY'�saiiilF� i;1{?i;itlN"t1 Line Item TOTAL 01 40 EXPENDITURE LINE ITEM: TELEPHONE Col. 1 - Description of Col. 3 - TOTAL Col. 4 - TOTAL Col. 5 - TOTAL Expense for the Program Col. 2 - Calculation Narrative for the PROGRAM AMOUNT FUNDER SPECIFIC AGENCY AMOUNT Budget Program Budget ' AMOUNT bt�r��tuSf%µXrSit��t C gti�tily 1?uuS:i4�;Y;'��11fSll:Nt�� d i;1{?i;itlN"t1 Line Item TOTAL 01 0 171 41 EXPENDITURE LINE.ITEM: TRAVEL/CONFERENCES/TRAINING Col. 1 - Description of Col. 3 - TOTAL Col. 4 - TOTAL COI. 1 - Description of . Col. 3 - TOTAL Col. 4 - TOTAL Col. 5 - TOTAL AGENCY AMOUNT Expense for the Program P g Col. 2 - Calculation Narrative for the PROGRAM AMOUNT FUNDER SPECIFIC AGENCY AMOUNT a Budget Program Budget AMOUNT Budget C a c NO b�hd�r Line Item TOTAL01 0 i�i�3l?';"`S�i1lpiiil?it`t f Line Item TOTALt1Si,i1u�niki�tixtk`illtiG;�tii't"`t�d`t't?tii'ii 0 `� 0 �� i4,�i3 Pt}Is1 t1#�ilt�d`5 MISS' WON, 1K I da}i1;i}'�";1'}i •"' ^_ `•� ,' `x` 0 0 Line Item TOTAL „a 'wa'nRiiwtti�kli,,, ' „'�iun i', 01 0 42 EXPENDITURE LINE ITEM: TRAVEL -DAILY Col. 1 - Description of Col. 3 - TOTAL Col. 4 - TOTAL Col. 5 - TOTAL Col. 4 - TOTAL Col. 5 - TOTAL FUNDER SPECIFIC AGENCY AMOUNT 'AMOUNT Expense for the Program Col. 2 - Calculation Narrative for the PROGRAM AMOUNT FUNDER SPECIFIC AGENCY AMOUNT Program Budget AMOUNT Program Budget AMOUNT a Budget }prAS�:�kp?;tB�iip�@�.,.};}�t htUr�•`p, a_ .0 C c NO d Line Item TOTAL01 0 i�i�3l?';"`S�i1lpiiil?it`t f Line Item TOTALt1Si,i1u�niki�tixtk`illtiG;�tii't"`t�d`t't?tii'ii 0 `� 0 �� IAb_�y 43 EXPENDITURE LINE ITEM: UTILITIES A Col. 1 - Description of Col. 3 - TOTAL Col. 4 - TOTAL PROGRAM AUNT Col. 5 - TOTAL Col. 4 - TOTAL Col. 5 - TOTAL FUNDER SPECIFIC AGENCY AMOUNT 'AMOUNT Expense for the Program Col. 2 - Calculation Narrative for the FUNDER SPECIFIC AGENCY AMOUNT Program Budget AMOUNT Budget Program Budget AMOUNT a Budget }prAS�:�kp?;tB�iip�@�.,.};}�t htUr�•`p, b v� C v e d Line Item TOTAL01 0 i�i�3l?';"`S�i1lpiiil?it`t 44 EXPENDITURE LINE ITEM: OTHER/MIS -ELLANEOUS _ EXPENDITURE LINE ITEM: PROFESSIONAL FEES LEGAL, CONSULTING COI. 1 - Description of Expense for the Program Budget y Col. 3 - TOTAL �p, COI. 2 - CalculatioAhlarrative for the PROGRAM AMOUNT .—. i\ P og ram,Budget Col. 4 - TOTAL Col. 5 - TOTAL FUNDER SPECIFIC AGENCY AMOUNT 'AMOUNT Expense for the Program Col. 2 - Calculation Narrative for the PROGRAM AMOUNT FUNDER SPECIFIC AGENCY AMOUNT Program Budget AMOUNT Budget }prAS�:�kp?;tB�iip�@�.,.};}�t htUr�•`p, v� v e d ly" i�i�3l?';"`S�i1lpiiil?it`t f / �l �� i4,�i3 Pt}Is1 t1#�ilt�d`5 Line Item TOTAL \ •"' ^_ `•� ,' `x` 0 0 U 45 EXPENDITURE LINE ITEM: PROFESSIONAL FEES LEGAL, CONSULTING Col. 1 - Description of Col. 3 - TOTAL Col. 4 - TOTAL Col. 5 -TOTAL Expense for the Program Col. 2 - Calculation Narrative for the PROGRAM AMOUNT FUNDER SPECIFIC AGENCY AMOUNT Program Budget AMOUNT Budget ciicai�t1�}"�'i�u�i d ' i 'U11�tKr r 1 �i s' 1hi i' Line Item TOTAL 't}4tsa`tii'�`4±`nti%�"v"�1��5'!?h`i 01 0 172 47 EXPENDITURE LINE ITEM: EQUIPMENT PURCHASES: CAPITAL EXPENSES Col. I - Description of Expense for the Program Budget Col. 3 -TOTAL Col. 4 -TOTAL Col. 2 - Calculation Narrative for the PROGRAM AMOUNT FUNDER SPECIFIC Program Budget AMOUNT Col. 5 -TOTAL AGENCY AMOUNT a c1 . . . . . . . . . . 111. d e AAs' A f t. 9 h Line Item TOTAL 1 01 Of 173 2018-19 CORE GRANT APPLICATION EXPLANATION FOR VARIANCES OF 15% OR MORE TOTAL PROGRAM BUDGET AGENCY NAME: Agency Name Here PROGRAM NAME: Program Name Here LINE ITEM EXPLANATION FOR VARIANCE Children Services Adviso Committee -Indian River Children's Services Council -St. Lucie Children's Services Council -Martin United W -St. Lucie County United Wa -Martin County United Way -Indian River County Other Counties Fundin other than above De artment of Children & Families Other State of Florida Grant Funds Other Federal Grant Funds Grants for funding Capital Exendlure; Contributions -Cash Le acies & Be uests Membershi Dues Pro ram Fees Fund Raising Events-Net— vents-NetF Funds nds from Other Sources (Specify if> 10% oftotal) Sales to Public -Net Investment Income Miscellaneous ,p.,_ "�► Reserve Funds Used for Operating �*1 In -Kind Donations (must be from audit or 990 and w, r N Salaries Employment Benefits Payroll Taxes Administrative Costs Advertisina N Audit Ex ense Books/Educational Materials Equipment: Rental & Maintenance Food & Nutrition Insurance Occupancy Bulldin Grounds It 11 Office Supplies Postaoe/Shloolna Printina & Publications \\// \ Specific Assistance to Individuals \1, Subscri tl n/Dues/Membershi s 16V Telephone Travel/Conferencesrrra!nin Travel -Dalt Utilities OtherlM!scellaneous Professional Fees (Legal, Consulting) Equipment Purchases: Ca ital Ex ense v A✓ I i Nv 2018-19 CORE GRANT APPLICATION EXPLANATION FOR VARIANCES OF 15% OR MORE IQ FUNDER SPECIFIC BUDGET AGENCY/PROGRAM NAME: LINE ITEM EXPLANATION FOR VARIANCE #DIVIO! #DIVI01 DIV 01 #DIVI01 #DIV 01 #DIVI01 #DIV 01 #DIV 01 #DIV/01 #DIVI01 #DIV/01 #DIV/01 #DIV 0! #DIV/01 #DIV/0! #DIV/01 #DIV 01 #DIVI01 #DIVI01 DIV 01 #DIVIO! #DIVI01 #DIV 0! #DIVI01 #DIV 0! 174 Indian River County Grant Contract This Grant Contract ("Contract") entered into effective this 1st day of October 2018 by and between Indian River County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, 1800 27th Street, Vero Beach FL, 32960 ("County') and (Recipient), of: (Address) For (Name of Program) Background Recitals A. The County has determined that it is in the public interest to promote healthy children in a healthy community. B. The County adopted Ordinance 99-1 on January 19, 1999 ("Ordinance") and established the Children's Services Advisory Committee to promote healthy children in a healthy community and to provide a unified system of planning and delivery within which children's needs can be identified, targeted, evaluated and addressed. C. The Children's Services Advisory Committee has issued a request for proposals from individuals and entities that will assist the Children's Services Advisory Committee in fulfilling its purpose. D. The proposals submitted to the Children's Services Advisory Committee and the recommendation of the Children's Services Advisory Committee have been reviewed by the County. E. The Recipient, by submitting a proposal to the Children's Services Advisory Committee, has applied for a grant of money ("Grant") for the Grant Period (as such term is hereinafter defined) on the terms and conditions set forth herein. F. The County has agreed to provide such Grant funds to the Recipient for the Grant Period (as such term is hereinafter defined) on the terms and conditions set forth herein. NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and promises herein contained, and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and adequacy of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties agree as follows: 1. Background Recitals The background recitals are true and correct and form a material part of this Contract. 2. Purpose of Grant The Grant shall be used only for the purposes set forth in the complete proposal submitted by the Recipient attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and incorporated herein by this reference (such purposes hereinafter referenced as "Grant Purposes"). 3. Term The Recipient acknowledges and agrees that the Grant is limited to the fiscal year 2018/19 ("Grant Period"). The Grant Period commences on October 1, 2018 and ends on September 30, 2019. 175 4. Grant Funds and Payment The approved Grant for the Grant Period is ($ . The County agrees to reimburse the Recipient from such Grant funds for actual documented costs incurred for Grant Purposes provided in accordance with this Contract. Reimbursement requests may be made no more frequently than monthly. Each reimbursement request shall contain the information, at a minimum, that is set forth in Exhibit "B" attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. All reimbursement requests are subject to audit by the County. In addition, the County may require additional documentation of expenditures, as it deems appropriate. 5. Additional Obligations of Recipient 5.1 Records. The Recipient shall maintain adequate internal controls in order to safeguard the Grant. In addition, the Recipient shall maintain adequate records fully to document the use of the Grant funds for at least three (3) years after the expiration of the Grant Period. The County shall have access to all books, records, and documents as required in this Section for the purpose of inspection or audit during normal business hours at the County's expense, upon five (5) days prior written notice. 5.2 Compliance with Laws. The Recipient shall comply at all times with all applicable federal, state, and local laws, rules, and regulations. 5.3 Quarterly Performance Reports. The Recipient shall submit quarterly, cumulative, Performance Reports to the Human Services Department of the County within fifteen (15) business days following: December 31, March 31, June 30, and September 30. These reports should include but not limited to the number of unduplicated children served during the quarter, and the progress the agency has made toward meeting their goals and objectives as they stated in their RFP response. 5.4 Audit Requirements. If Recipient receives $100,000 or more in the aggregate from all Indian River County government funding sources, the Recipient is required to have an audit completed by an independent certified public accountant at the end of the Recipient's fiscal year. Within 120 days of the end of the Recipient's fiscal year, the Recipient shall submit the audit to the Indian River County Office of Management and Budget. The fiscal year will be as reported on the application for funding, and the Recipient agrees to notify the County prior to any change in the fiscal period of Recipient. The Recipient acknowledges that the County may deny funding to any Recipient if an audit required by this Contract for a prior fiscal year is past due and has not been submitted by May 1. 5.4.1 The Recipient further acknowledges that, promptly upon receipt of a qualified opinion from their independent auditor, such qualified opinion shall immediately be provided to the Indian River County Office of Management and Budget. The qualified opinion shall thereupon be reported to the Board of County Commissioners and funding under this Contract will cease immediately. The foregoing termination right is in addition to any other right of the County to terminate this Contract. 5.4.2 The Indian River County Office of Management and Budget reserves the right at any time to send a letter to the Recipient requesting clarification if there are any questions regarding a part of the financial statements, audit comments, or notes. 5.5 Insurance Requirements. Recipient shall, no later than October 1, 2018, provide to the Indian River County Risk Management Division a certificate or certificates issued by an insurer or insurers authorized to conduct business in Florida that is rated 176 not less than category A-: VII by A.M. Best, subject to approval by Indian River County's risk manager, of the following types and amounts of insurance: (i) Commercial General Liability Insurance in an amount not less than $1,000,000 combined single limit for bodily injury and property damage, including coverage for premises/operations, products/completed operations, contractual liability, and independent contractors; (ii) Business Auto Liability Insurance in an amount not less than $1,000,000 per occurrence combined single limit for bodily injury and property damage, including coverage for owned autos and other vehicles, hired autos and other vehicles, non -owned autos and other vehicles; and (iii) Workers' Compensation and Employer's Liability (current Florida statutory limit) (iv) In the event that children are supervised, Sexual Molestation Liability Insurance in an amount not less than $1,000,000 each occurrence/claim. 5.6 Insurance Administration. The insurance certificates, evidencing all required insurance coverages shall be fully acceptable to County in both form and content, and shall provide and specify that the related insurance coverage shall not be cancelled without at least thirty (30) calendar days prior written notice having been given to the County. In addition, the County may request such other proofs and assurances as it may reasonably require that the insurance is and at all times remains in full force and effect. Recipient agrees that it is the Recipient's sole responsibility to coordinate activities among itself, the County, and the Recipient's insurer(s) so that the insurance certificates are acceptable to and accepted by County within the time limits set forth in this Contract. The County shall be listed as an additional insured on all insurance coverage required by this Contract, except Workers' Compensation insurance. The Recipient shall, upon ten (10) days' prior written request from the County, deliver copies to the County, or make copies available for the County's inspection at Recipient's place of business, of any and all insurance policies that are required in this Contract. If the Recipient fails to deliver or make copies of the policies available to the County; fails to obtain replacement insurance or have previous insurance policies reinstated or renewed upon termination or cancellation of existing required coverages; or fails in any other regard to obtain coverages sufficient to meet the terms and conditions of this Contract, then the County may, at its sole option, terminate this Contract. 5.7 Indemnification. The Recipient shall indemnify and save harmless the County, its agents, officials, and employees from and against any and all claims, liabilities, losses, damage, or causes of action which may arise from any misconduct, negligent act, or omissions of the Recipient, its agents, officers, or employees in connection with the performance of this Contract. 5.8 Public Records. The Recipient agrees to comply with the provisions of Chapter 119, Florida Statutes (Public Records Law).. The Recipient shall comply with Florida's Public Records Law. Specifically, the Recipient shall: (1) Keep and maintain public records that ordinarily and necessarily would be required by the County in order to perform the service. (2) Provide the public with access to public records on the same terms and conditions that the County would provide the records and at a cost that does not exceed the cost provided in chapter 119 or as otherwise provided by law. 177 (3) Ensure that public records that are exempt or confidential and exempt from public records disclosure requirements are not disclosed except as authorized by law. (4) Meet all requirements for retaining public records and transfer, at no cost, to the County all public records in possession of the Recipient upon termination of the Agreement and destroy any duplicate public records that are exempt or confidential and exempt from public records disclosure requirements. All records stored electronically must be provided to the County in a format that is compatible with the information technology systems of the County. Failure of the Recipient to comply with these requirements shall be a material breach of this Agreement. IF THE CONTRACTOR HAS QUESTIONS REGARDING THE APPLICATION OF CHAPTER 119, FLORIDA STATUTES, TO THE CONTRACTOR'S DUTY TO PROVIDE PUBLIC RECORDS RELATING TO THIS CONTRACT, CONTACT THE CUSTODIAN OF PUBLIC RECORDS AT: (772)226-1424 PUBLICRECORDSC@-IRCGOV.COM Indian River County of the County Attorney 1801 27th Street Vero Beach, FL 32960 6. Termination. This Contract may be terminated by either party, without cause, upon thirty (30) days prior written notice to the other party. In addition, the County may terminate this Contract for convenience upon ten (10) days prior written notice to the Recipient if the County determines that such termination is in the public interest. 7. Availability of Funds. The obligations of the County under this Contract are subject to the availability of funds lawfully appropriated for its purpose by the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County. 8. Standard Terms. This Contract is subject to the standard terms attached hereto as Exhibit C and incorporated herein in its entirety by this reference. 9. Sovereign Immunity. Nothing herein shall constitute a waiver of the County's sovereign immunity. 10. Notification. Recipient shall notify County of all changes in Recipient's senior management and of any litigation filed against or by Recipient. 178 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, County and Recipient have entered into this Contract on the date first above written. INDIAN RIVER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS By: Commissioner Peter O'Bryan, Chairman Attest: Jeffrey R Smith, Clerk of Courts & Comptroller By: Deputy Clerk Approved: Jason Brown, County Administrator RECIPIENT: By: Approved as to form and legal sufficiency: Dylan Reingold, County Attorney Agency Name: 179 EXHIBIT A [Copy of proposal cover page] 180 EXHIBIT B [From policy adopted by Indian River County Board Of County Commissioners on February 19, 2002] "D. Nonprofit Agency Responsibilities After Award of Funding Indian River County provides funding to all nonprofit agencies on a reimbursement basis only. All reimbursable expenses must be documented by an invoice and/or a copy of the canceled check. Any expense not documented properly to the satisfaction of the Office of Management & Budget and/or the County Administrator may not be reimbursed. If an agency repeatedly fails to provide adequate documentation, this may be reported to the Board of Commissioners. In the event an agency provides inadequate documentation on a consistent basis, funding may be discontinued immediately. Additionally, this may adversely affect future funding requests. Expenditures may only be reimbursed from the fiscal year for which funding was awarded. For example, no expenditures prior to October 1st may be reimbursed with funds from the following year. Additionally, if any funds are unexpended at the end of a fiscal year, these funds are not carried over to the next year unless expressly authorized by the Board of Commissioners. All requests for reimbursement at fiscal year end (September 301h) must be submitted on a timely basis. Each year, the Office of Management & Budget will send a letter to all nonprofit agencies advising of the deadline for reimbursement requests for the fiscal year. This deadline is typically early to mid October, since the Finance Department does not process checks for the prior fiscal year beyond that point. Each reimbursement request must include a summary of expenses by type. These summaries should be broken down into salaries, benefits, supplies, contractual services, etc. If Indian River County is reimbursing an agency for only a portion of an expense (e.g. salary of an employee), then the method for this portion should be disclosed on the summary. The Office of Management & Budget has summary forms available. Indian River County will not reimburse certain types of expenditures. These expenditure types are listed below. a. Travel expenses for travel outside the County including but not limited to; mileage reimbursement, hotel rooms, meals, meal allowances, per Diem, and tolls. Mileage reimbursement for local travel (within Indian River County) is allowable. b. Sick or Vacation payments for employees. Since agencies may have various sick and vacation pay policies, these must be provided from other sources. c. Any expenses not associated with the provision of the program for which the County has awarded funding. d. Any expense not outlined in the agency's funding application. The County reserves the right to decline reimbursement for any expense as deemed necessary." 181 EXHIBIT C STANDARD TERMS FOR GRANT CONTRACT 1. Notices: Any notice, request, demand, consent, approval or other communication required or permitted by this Contract shall be given or made in writing, by any of the following methods: facsimile transmission; hand delivery to the other party; delivery by commercial overnight courier service; or mailed by registered or certified mail (postage prepaid), return receipt requested at the addresses of the parties shown below: County: Brad E. Bernauer, Director Indian River County Human Services 180027 TH Street Vero Beach, Florida 32960-3365 Recipient: 2. Venue; Choice of Law: The validity, interpretation, construction, and effect of this Contract shall be in accordance with and governed by the laws of the State of Florida, only. The location for settlement of any and all claims, controversies, or disputes, arising out of or relating to any part of this Contract, or any breach hereof, as well as any litigation between the parties, shall be Indian River County, Florida for claims brought in state court, and the Southern District of Florida for those claims justifiable in federal court. 3. Entirety of Agreement: This Contract incorporates and includes all prior and contemporaneous negotiations, correspondence, conversations, agreements, and understandings applicable to the matters contained herein and the parties agree that there are no commitments, agreements, or understandings concerning the subject matter of this Contract that are not contained herein. Accordingly, it is agreed that no deviation from the terms hereof shall be predicated upon any prior representations or agreements, whether oral or written. It is further agreed that no modification, amendment or alteration in the terms and conditions contained herein shall be effective unless contained in a written document signed by both parties. 4. Severability: In the event any provision of this Contract is determined to be unenforceable or invalid, such unenforceability or invalidity shall not affect the remaining provisions of this Contract, and every other term and provision of this Contract shall be deemed valid and enforceable to the extent permitted by law. To that extent, this Contract is deemed severable. 5. Captions and Interpretations: Captions in this Contract are included for convenience only and are not to be considered in any construction or interpretation of this Contract or any of its provisions. Unless the context indicates otherwise, words importing the singular number include the plural number, and vice versa. Words of any gender include the correlative words of the other genders, unless the sense indicates otherwise. 6. Independent Contractor. The Recipient is and shall be an independent contractor for all purposes under this Contract. The Recipient is not an agent or employee of the County, and any and all persons engaged in any of the services or activities funded in whole or in part performed pursuant to this Contract shall at all times and in all places be subject to the Recipient's sole direction, supervision, and control. 7. Assignment. This Contract may not be assigned by the Recipient without the prior written consent of the County. - EXHIBIT C - 182 FUNDING FOCUS AREAS OF NEED 2018-19 Introduction: The 2014 IRC Children's Needs Assessment has provided valuable information to help guide the Child Services Advisory Committee (CSAC). Parts of this data was reevaluated in 2018. The following outlines what will be considered for all grant requests. Larger Picture The community must start taking a long-term view focusing 15-25 years out. We have a cycle of poverty in IRC that has been increasing and needs to be broken. Interventions should start as early as possible in a child's life in order to have the greatest impact. IRC agencies should use best practices. a. Evidence based with measurable outcomes over time b. Cost effective/efficient c. Skilled executive, program, and board leadership d. Strong fiscal management e. Opportunity for broad impact (replicable, scalable, lever gable) Focus should be on the pockets of poverty. Given that IRC poverty is in geographically disbursed pockets and that we have unique transportation problems, we must always keep in mind that services need to be available where and when people need and can access them. We must utilize the best mediums to clearly communicate what, when and where these services are available. Collaboration in the community is essential and can help optimize human and financial resources, expose and eliminate overlap. The considerations highlighted above have precedence over the actual CSAC Focus Areas listed below. 2018-19 CSAC Focus Areas (ranked in order by the Advisory Team at the completion of the Needs Assessment process and updated for clarity Mental health affects every Focus Area. We have decided not to make mental health a separate Focus Area, but to evaluate mental health interventions relevant to each Focus Area. 1. Early Childhood Development This encompasses birth to age 5. For the younger children, this would mean improving the interactions they have beginning at birth with their caregivers and with focus on physical, social emotional and cognitive development. It would include improving the quality at childcare, PreK 183 and Voluntary PreK providers as well as improving financial accessibility by leveraging available federal and state funds. Why: Research shows that the period 0-5 is the most important time for brain development. Physical, social emotional and cognitive skills can be significantly impacted during this time. 2. Build Parent CapacitX This encompasses improving parenting skills at every age of a child's life and providing support mechanisms for parents, including the pre -natal period. A priority would be new parents in particular first time and single parents and those in the poverty pockets. Why: A parent is a child's first and most important teacher. We need to equip parents to be the good parents that they all want to be. 3. After school and summer recreational activities and academic enrichment programs They need to be free/affordable and accessible (transportation) to parents and children. They should include a literacy/tutoring component. We hold agencies to a high standard of what constitutes academic enrichment. Mentoring programs are included. There is a large gap of programs for children 12+. Why: Children need to develop positive out of school outlets that keep them engaged in school, promote their health and provide connections (to sports/hobbies, a person or group, etc). There is a wealth of data supporting extended day and extended year. 4. Middle and High School programs that address risky behavior Programs that help adolescents and teens develop the tools to become productive, healthy and law-abiding citizens and address risky behavior (alcohol, tobacco, vaping, drugs, delinquency, teen pregnancy, STDs, bullying, etc.) Why: There is a lot of at risk behavior and we need to ensure that it is addressed early and repeatedly. 184 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA MEMORANDUM TO: Jason E. Brown; County Administrator THROUGH: Stan Boling, AICP Community Development Director THROUGH: Sasan Rohani, AICP Chief, Long -Range Planning FROM: Bill Schutt, AICP Senior Economic Development Planner, Long Range Planning DATE: March 5, 2018 RE: Kane Request to Rezone f 2.009 Acres from RS -1 to RS -3 & ± 4.827 Acres from RS -1 to CON -2 (RZON-2017080084-80032) (Quasi -Judicial) It is requested that the following information be given formal consideration by the Board of County Commissioners at its regular meeting of March 20, 2018. DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS This request is to rezone ±2.009 acres from RS -1, Single -Family Residential District (up to I units/acre) to RS -3, Single -Family Residential District (up to 3 units/acre), and ±4.827 acres from RS -1, Single -Family Residential District (up to 1 units/acre) to CON -2, Conservation District (up to 1 unit/40 acres). As shown in Figure 1, the subject property is located north and adjacent to Round Island Riverside Park and west of South Highway AIA. The purpose of this request is to secure the zoning necessary to develop the ±2.009 acre site at a density consistent with the allowed density of its comprehensive plan land use designation and to conserve wetlands by rezoning the wetland area to a conservation district. On February 8, 2018, the Planning and Zoning Commission voted 5 — 0 to recommend that the Board of County Commissioners approve this rezoning request (see attachment 3). Existing Land Use Pattern This portion of the county consists of a mix of environmentally sensitive land, residential, and public recreational and conservation uses. As shown on Figure 1, the subject property is vacant, with an upland area that has been cleared on the property's eastern portion and a wetland covering the remaining ±2/3rds of the property. Figures 2 and 3 show that the property to the south is zoned RS -3, Single -Family Residential District (up to 3 units/acre) and contains Round Island Riverside Park. The property to the east across South Highway AIA is also zoned RS -3, Single -Family Residential District (up to 3 units/acre) and contains Round Island Oceanside Park and vacant land. The property to the north is zoned RS -1, Single -Family Residential District (up to 1 units/acre) and is vacant. Along the Indian River Lagoon, the RS -1 district serves as a "holding zone" until a site specific estuarine wetlands boundary is determined to provide a basis for conservation zoning 185 of the wetlands and conventional residential zoning of the uplands. To the west of the subject property is the Indian River Lagoon. Figure 1 Figure 2 Existing Zoning of Subject Properties 2 186 Kane Property RS - 1 ! +/-2.009 Acres -1 j' ) ; „<,�..... f RS -1 to RS -3 RS -1 / o 3 RS -1 a.°wom,omeroo:°, `4� RS -3 j RS -1 •t RS -1°° ;D •u \ ..°.m.e.,, RS_1 a, RS -1 \ RS•1, � RS -3 \ wo „. , Kane Property CON -1\. +/-4.827 Acres RS -1 to CON -2 \ \ 2 186 Figure 3 Proposed Zoning of Subject Properties N j IRS -1 Kane Property RS_j a , ,�,°, +/-2.009 Acres RS -1 to RS -3 - ILS -1 a.a.xar,cmce+,.` RS -4 RS -1 v \ l \ RS -1 CON -2 RS -3 RS 1, RS -3 e RS -3 Kane Property i CON -1 +/-4.827 Acres RS -1 to CON -2 Future Land Use Pattern As shown on Figure 4, the subject property and properties to the north along the Indian River Lagoon are designated C-2, Conservation -2 (up to 1 unit/40 acres), on the Comprehensive Plan's Future Land Use Map. Land to the East (across South Highway AIA) is designated REC, Recreation, and L- 1, Low -Density Residential -1 (up to 3 units/acre). Property to the south is also designated REC, Recreation. The L-1 designation permits residential uses with densities up to 3 units/acre. The C-2 designation is intended to protect privately owned estuarine wetland and undeveloped lagoon island conservation areas. Development within C-2 designated areas is limited to conservation uses, passive recreational uses, and residential uses up to 1 unit/40 acres on site and up to 1 unit/acre if approved through a transfer of development rights in conjunction with a planned development (PD) project. The subject property is currently designated C-2, Conservation -2 (up to 1 unit/40 acres) due to the presence of some amount of estuarine wetlands on site. The current designation essentially functions as an initial "broad brush" designation that is refined when site-specific environmental information is made available. Pursuant to Future Land Use Element Policy 1.7, the exact boundaries of the C-2 Future Land Use Designation can only be determined by an environmental survey with areas identified as estuarine wetlands remaining as C-2 and any uplands designated the same as contiguous adjacent upland property. With the property currently under consideration, contiguous upland area includes REC, Recreation, and L-1, Low -Density Residential -1 (up to 3 units/acre). Since REC, Recreation is a land use designation for public parks, and the property is 187 in private ownership, the appropriate land use designation for the upland portion of the subject site is L-1, Low -Density Residential -1 (up to 3 units/acre). Environment The ±2.009 acre upland portion of the property is an altered site that was cleared. The remaining ±4.827 acres to the west of the upland portion contains environmentally sensitive estuarine wetlands. A survey submitted by the applicant and approved by environmental planning staff denotes the boundary between the estuarine wetlands and the adjacent uplands. While the uplands are proposed to be rezoned to RS -3, pursuant to requirements listed within Future Land Use Element Policy 1.7 and Section 911.05(3) of the County Land Development Regulations, the wetland area and any remaining land west of the ±2.009 acre upland area will be rezoned to CON - 2, estuarine wetland Conservation District (up to 1 unit/ 40 acres) in conjunction with the upland rezoning. According to Flood Insurance Rating Maps, the wetlands portion of the subject property is in flood zone AE and the remaining upland area is not in a flood zone (designated X or X500). Utilities and Services The subject property lies within the Urban Service Area of the County. Wastewater and water service is available to the site from City of Vero Beach water and sewer utility services. Figure 4 Future Land Use of Subject Properties N ; C-2 , Kane Property C-2 %1� +/-2.009 Acres I -1 C-2 � n.»..�°°•.�sc°°"a, a. -..ate CO i C-2 s C-2 n. K.� ,. C-2 RM \ REC FMC REC REC i I 41' aw,.00xmwcue L Kane 11 Property C-1 m '"°°"a"°°"° c, +/-4.827 Acres C-1 ` \ L-1 *' 1 4 188 Transportation System The property's east boundary abuts South Highway AIA. Classified as a Urban Minor Arterial road on the future roadway thoroughfare plan map, this segment of South Highway AIA is a 2 - lane paved road with between 100 and 115 feet of existing public road right-of-way. ANALYSIS In this section, an analysis of the reasonableness of the rezoning request will be presented. Specifically, this section will include an analysis of the request's: • Impact on public facilities; • Consistency with the county's comprehensive plan; • Compatibility with the surrounding area; and • Potential impact on environmental quality. Impact on Public Facilities The subject property is located within the Urban Service Area, an area deemed suited for urban scale development. Within the Urban Service Area, the comprehensive plan establishes standards for: Transportation, Potable Water, Wastewater, Solid Waste, Stormwater Management, and Recreation (reference Future Land Use Element Policy 3.1). Adequate provision of those services is necessary to ensure the continued quality of life enjoyed by the community. To ensure that the minimum acceptable standards for those services and facilities are maintained, the comprehensive plan requires that new development be reviewed for a concurrency determination. For rezoning requests, that review is undertaken as part of the conditional concurrency determination application process. As per section 910.07 of the County's Land Development Regulations (LDRs), conditional concurrency review examines the available capacity of each facility with respect to a proposed project. Since rezoning requests are not projects, county regulations call for the concurrency review to be based upon the most intense use of the subject property based upon the requested rezoning district. As per section 910.07(2) of the Concurrency Management Chapter of the County's Land Development Regulations, projects which do not increase land use density or intensity are exempt from concurrency requirements. Since the current RS -1 zoning of the subject property potentially allows a maximum of 6 residential units on the overall property and the proposed RS-3/CON-2 zoning will potentially allow the same maximum number of residential units there will be no increase in density or intensity of development due to this rezoning request. Therefore, the subject request is exempt from the county's concurrency determination requirement. Consistency with Comprehensive Plan Rezoning requests are reviewed for consistency with all applicable policies of the comprehensive plan. Rezoning requests must also be consistent with the overall designation of land uses as depicted on the Future Land Use Map. In this case, the subject property is designated C-2, Conservation -2 (up to 1 unit/40 acres). Pursuant to Future Land Use Element Policy 1.7, the exact 189 boundaries of the C-2 Future Land Use Designation must be determined by environmental survey with areas identified as estuarine wetlands remaining as C-2 and any upland area designated the same as contiguous adjacent upland property. With the property currently under consideration, contiguous area includes REC, Recreation, and L-1, Low -Density Residential -1 (up to 3 units/acre). Since REC, Recreation is a land use designation for public parks, and the property is in private ownership, the land use designation for the upland portion of the site is L-1, Low -Density Residential -1 (up to 3 units/acre). Since RS -3 zoning is allowed in the L-1 land use designation, the proposed zoning is consistent with the Future Land Use Map. Other than the Future Land Use Map, the goals, objectives, and policies are the most important parts of the comprehensive plan. Policies are statements in the plan that identify the actions which the county will take in order to direct the community's development. As courses of action committed to by the county, policies provide the basis for all county land development decisions. While all comprehensive plan policies are important, some have more applicability than others in reviewing rezoning requests. Of particular applicability for this request are the following objectives and policies: Future Land Use Element Objective 1 Future Land Use Element Objective 1 states that the county will have a compact land use pattern which reduces urban sprawl. By allowing the site to be developed in a manner that is consistent with the site's land use designation, the request allows a more compact land use pattern within the urban service area and reduces the chances that urban sprawl will occur. For these reasons, the request is consistent with Future Land Use Element Objective 1. Future Land Use Element Policies 1.11 and 1.12 Future Land Use Element Policy 1.11 states that these residential uses must be located within the urban service area. In addition, Future Land Use Element Policy 1.12 states that the L-1, Low - Density Residential -1, land use designation is intended for residential uses with densities up to 3 units/acre. Since the subject property is located within the county's urban service area, is located within an area designated as L-1 on the county's Future Land Use Map, and the proposed zoning district for the uplands would permit residential uses no greater than the 3 units/acre permitted by the L-1 designation, the proposed request is consistent with Policies 1.11 and 1.12. • Future Land Use Element Policy 2.2 Future Land Use Element Policy 2.2 states that the county shall encourage and direct growth into the urban service area through zoning and LDRs. Since the proposed rezoning would allow and encourage more development on the subject property and the subject property is within the urban service area, the request implements Future Land Use Element Policy 2.2. Future Land Use Element Policies 1.5, 1.6 and 1.7 Future Land Use Element Policy 1.5 states that the conservation land use designations shall be applied to those areas which contain or possess lands with qualities or features that play a vital or 190 essential role in the normal functioning of the county's ecosystems. Future Land Use Element Policy 1.6 states that privately owned estuarine wetlands will be designated as Conservation -2, while Future Land Use Element Policy 1.7 states that the boundaries of Conservation -2 shall be determined by an environmental survey. Because the subject property contains privately owned estuarine wetland areas that possess qualities and features that play a vital or essential role in the county's ecosystems and because the boundaries of those wetlands have been determined by a survey, changing the zoning of the estuarine wetlands to CON -2, Conservation District -2 (up to 1 unit/ 40 acres), is consistent with and will implement Future Land Use Element Policies 1. 5, 1.6 and 1.7. While the referenced policies are particularly applicable to this request, other Comprehensive Plan policies and objectives also have relevance. For that reason, staff evaluated the subject request for consistency with all applicable plan policies and objectives. Based upon that analysis, staff determined that the request is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. Compatibility with the Surrounding Area Staff's position is that the requested zoning districts are appropriate for the site and that development of the uplands under the RS -3 zoning district and preservation of the wetlands under the CON -2 zoning district would be compatible with surrounding land uses. At least two factors indicate that the proposed RS -3 zoning district would be appropriate for this portion of the county; these are: the underlying designation on the Future Land Use Map of L-1, Low -Density Residential -1 (up to 3 units per acre); and the development pattern in this portion of the County. Since properties to the east and south are zoned RS -3, rezoning the subject property to RS-3/CON- 2 would constitute an extension of the RS -3 zoning, thereby ensuring compatibility. Equally important is the development pattern in this portion of the county. This area of the county is primarily developed with low density single family residential properties. Many of these properties are at a density that is equivalent to the density that would be allowed under the proposed RS-3/CON-2 zoning. Therefore, no incompatibilities are anticipated to occur as a result of the proposed rezoning. For these reasons, staff feels that the requested RS-3/CON-2 zoning districts would be compatible with development in the surrounding area. Potential Impact on Environmental Quality The upland portion of the subject property has been cleared to a large extent and is no longer in its natural state while the wetlands portion of the overall site is in its natural state. When an application for development approval is submitted, the County will conduct a detailed review of potential environmental impacts of development on the subject property and apply applicable development criteria. Also, CON -2 zoning of the western 2/3rds of the site provides for maximum environmental protection. For these reasons, no adverse environmental impacts associated with this rezoning request are anticipated. 191 CONCLUSION The requested zoning districts are compatible with the surrounding area, are consistent with the comprehensive plan, will have no negative impacts on environmental quality, and meet all applicable criteria to be rezoned to RS -3 and CON -2. Most importantly, the subject ±2.009 acre uplands are located in an area deemed suitable for low-density single-family uses and the ±4.827 acre estuarine wetlands have now been identified by a site specific environmental survey for re- designation to conservation. For these reasons, staff supports the request. RECOMMENDATION Based on the analysis, staff and the Planning and Zoning Commission recommend that the Board of County Commissioners approve this request to rezone the subject property from RS -1 to RS -3 and CON -2 by adopting the attached ordinance. ATTACHMENTS 1. Summary Page 2. Rezoning Application 3. Unapproved Minutes of the February 8, 2018 Planning and Zoning Commission meeting 4. Rezoning ordinance F:\CommunityDevelopment\Rezonings\Kane Rezoning -2017080094 RSI to CON2 & RS3\Staff Reports\BCC staffreport March 20, 2018.docx 192 GENERAL Applicant: Location: . Acreag : Land Use Designation: ExistingZg: Requested Zoning: Existing Land Use: SUMMARY PAGE Eugene J. Kane, Jr. 2175 South Highway AIA Upland Portion = ±2.009 acres Wetland Portion = ±4.827 acres C-2, Conservation -2 (up to 1 unit/40 acres), RS -1, Single -Family Residential District (up to 1 units/acre) RS -3, Single -Family Residential District (up to 3 units/acre) CON -2, Conservation District (up to 1 unit/40 acres) Vacant ADJACENT LAND North: RS -1, Single -Family Residential District (up to 1 units/acre) South: RS -3, Single -Family Residential District (up to 3 units/acre) East: South Highway AlA and RS -3, Single -Family Residential District (up to 3 units/acre) West: Indian River Lagoon INFRASTRUCTURE Potable water and wastewater service is available to the site from the City of Vero Beach. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSTRAINTS None PUBLIC NOTIFICATION Proposed Zonnig of Subject Properties STAFF RECOMMENDATION Approval ATTACHMENT 1 193 Planning and Board of Zoning County Commission Commissioners Staff Contact: Bill Schutt Bill Schutt Date 1/24/18 3/4/18 Advertised: # of Surrounding Property 5 5 Owner Notifications: Date Notification 1/24/18 3/4/18 Mailed: Date Sign 1/24/18 3/4/18 Posted: Proposed Zonnig of Subject Properties STAFF RECOMMENDATION Approval ATTACHMENT 1 193 APPLICATION FORM REZONING REQUEST (RZON) INDIAN RIVER COUNTY Each application must be complete when submitted and must include all required attachments. An incomplete application will not be processed and will be returned to the applicant. -2- C, _ S,t5 -Assigned Project Number: RZON- •a0170 00 — 063c'\ Current Owner Applicant (Contract Purchaser Agent Name: Eugene J. Kane, Jr. N/A N/A Complete Mailing Address: 825 Reef Road Vero Beach, FL 32963 Phone #: (including area code 772-539-2685 Fax #: (including area code) N/A E -Mail: Gene4444@gmail.com Contact Person: Gene Kane Signature of Owner orAgent: Property Information Site Address: 2175 S. AIA, Vero Beach, FL 32963 Site Tax Parcel I.D. #s: 33-40-34-00001-000000012.0 Subdivision Name, Unit Number, Block and Lot Number (if applicable) N/A Existing Zoning District: RS -1 Existing Land Use Designation: L-1 Requested Zoning District: RS -3- 6.836 (Survey) Total(gross) Acreage of Parcel: 7.8 +/- Rax Map) Acreage net to be Rezoned: +/-2.009 acres and remaining Existing Use on Site: Vacant acreage west of +/- 2.009 acr as CON -2 Proposed Use on Site: Residential Attachment 2 THE APPLICANT IS STRONGLY ENCOURAGED TO ATTEND A PRE -APPLICATION CONFERENCE WITH LONG-RANGE PLANNING SECTION STAFF PRIOR TO APPLYING IN ORDER TO RESOLVE OR AVOID PROBLEMS CONNECTED WITH THE REZONING REQUEST. REZONING APPLICATION CHECKLIST Please attach the following items to this application. Do not ignore any of the items. Indicate "N/A" if an item is not applicable. ITEMS Applicant's Checklist Staff Checklist 1. Fee: Property Size " - Less than 5 Acres $1,550.00 - 5 to 40 Acres $2,000.00 - 41 to 100 Acres $2,300.00 - More than 100 Acres $2,500.00* * $125.00 for each additional 25 acres over 100 acres 2. Completed Rezoning Application Form front page) x 3. Letter of Authorization from Current Owner(s) OR Current Owner is Applicant N/A 4. Verified statement (separate letter) naming every individual or entity having legal or equitable ownership in the property. 5. One 1 Copy of the current Owner's Deed x 6. A Current Owner's Title Policy OR A Certificate of Title from a Title Company OR An attorney's written opinion evidencing fee x ownership of the property. 7. One (1) SEALED boundary survey of the area to be rezoned. The boundary survey shall include, but not be limited to the following: ❑ a legal description of the land to be rezoned x ❑ the size of the land to be rezoned ❑ the public road right-of-way width of adjacent roads; and ❑ a north arrow 8. Electronic version (MS Word is preferable) of the legal description 9. Copy of Approved Concurrency Certificate OR Copy of filed application for Concurrency Certificate, including traffic study, if applicable NOTE: ITEMS 2-6 MUST INDICATE THE SAME OWNERSHIP OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY. Revised: January 10, 2005 FACommunity DevelopmentlUsersIYICKIEIFORMSkezoningmquestfomLdoa 195 to expand. Dr. Richard Moore, cardiologist at Indian River Medical Center, spoke of future plans to expand medical facilities at the remaining MED zoned properties. ON MOTION BY Mr. Landers, SECONDED BY Mr. Stewart, the members voted unanimously (5-0) to approve staff recommendations on this Quasi - Judicial matter to rezone the western 10.14 acres, to include the Colley piece, from MED to CG and deny the rezoning of the eastern eight acres from MED to CG. Chairman Polackwich read the following into the record: B. Kane Request to rezone +/- 2.009 acres from RS -1 to RS -3 and +/- 4.827 acres from RS -1 to CON -2 (RZON-201708084-80032). [Quasi - Judicial] Chairman Polackwich asked the Commissioners to reveal any ex -parte communication with the applicant or any conflict that would not allow them to make an unbiased decision. The members stated that they had not had any ex - parte communication. Mr. William Schutt, Senior Economic Development Planner, reviewed information regarding this rezoning request and gave a PowerPoint presentation, copies of which are on file in the Board of County Commissioners (BCC) Office. He entered a letter into evidence from a nearby property owner that spoke in agreement of the rezoning request. He recommended that the Commissioners recommend that the BCC approve the rezoning request from RS -1 to RS -3 and CON -2. The secretary belatedly administered the testimonial oath to those present who wished to speak at tonight's meeting on this matter and Mr. Schutt reaffirmed his presentation. Representative for the Applicant, Mr. Scott McGuire of the civil engineering firm Knight McGuire & Associates Incorporated, testified that this request will simply bring the Subject Property into conformance with similar properties on the south barrier island. Mr. Kevin Ellis, property manager of the adjacent Subject Property, conveyed his concerns regarding this request concluding that he is not in favor of it moving forward. Attachment 3 PZC/Unapproved 4 February 8, 2018 F:\BCC\All Committees\P&Z\2018—AGENDAS & MINUTES\PZC 020818.doc 196 Mr. Roland DeBlois, Environmental and Code Enforcement Chief, provided background of the County's 1990 adoption of the more conservative CON -2 zoning as opposed to the previous default RS -1 designation for properties along the wetlands, and that the RS -1 zoning functions as a 'holding zoning" until an estuary wetlands survey is prepared to determine specific CON -2 boundaries. ON MOTION BY Mr. Brognano, SECONDED BY Ms. Waldrop, the members voted unanimously (5-0) to approve staff recommendations on this Quasi - Judicial matter. Chairman Polackwich read the following into the record: C. An ordinance of Indian River County, Florida, amending the text of the sanitary sewer sub -element, future land use element, and coastal management element of the County's Comprehensive Plan and providing codification, severability, and effective date. [Legislative] Part 1: Sanitary sewer sub -element amendments and related amendments to the Future Land Use Element. Mr. William Schutt, Senior Economic Development Planner, detailed proposed edits relating to sanitary sewer in the Future Land Use Element and gave a PowerPoint presentation, copies of which are on file in the Board of County Commissioners (BCC) Office. He recommended that the Commissioners recommend that the BCC approve the proposed Future Land Use Element Comprehensive Plan text amendments for transmittal to state and regional review agencies. Ms. Judy Orcott, Chairperson of the Lagoon Committee for Indian River Neighborhood Association, reported that the County's fertilizer ordinance has been proven to reduce the amount of nitrogen levels in the lagoon. She addressed the approximate 35,000 septic systems in the County and the time and financial obstacles involved in either improving these current systems and treatment methods or ideally connecting to County sewer. She explained that the septic systems installed prior to 1983 have only a six-inch separation between the ground water and the drainfield whereas those installed after 1982 require twenty-four inches, adding that approximately half of the County's septic systems have only the six-inch separation. She recommended that as older systems are issued repair permits, they be required to raise the drainfield to the current code of twenty-four inches. She inquired about possible mandatory connections as sewer infrastructures are created and stated her hope for higher annual goals for PZC/Unapproved 5 February 8, 2018 F:\BCC\All Committees\P&Z\2018—AGENDAS & MINUTES\PZC 020818.doc 197 ORDINANCE NO. 2018 - AN ORDINANCE OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE AND THE ACCOMPANYING ZONING MAP FOR APPROXIMATELY ±6.836 ACRES LOCATED NORTH OF AND ADJACENT TO ROUND ISLAND RIVERSIDE PARK AND WEST OF SOUTH HIGHWAY AIA BY REZONING ±2.009 ACRES ADJACENT TO SOUTH HIGHWAY AIA FROM RS -1, SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (UP TO 1 UNITS/ACRE), TO RS -3, SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (UP TO 3 UNITS/ACRE), AND BY REZONING THE REMAINING ±4.827 ACRES FROM RS -1, SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (UP TO 1 UNITS/ACRE), TO CON -2, ESTUARINE WETLANDS CONSERVATION DISTRICT (UP TO 1 UNIT/40 ACRES); AND PROVIDING CODIFICATION, SEVERABILITY, AND EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission, sitting as the local planning agency on such matters, held a public hearing and subsequently made a recommendation regarding this rezoning request; and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida, did publish and send its Notice of Intent to rezone the hereinafter described property; and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners held a public hearing pursuant to this rezoning request, at which parties in interest and citizens were heard; and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners determined that this rezoning is in conformance with the Comprehensive Plan of Indian River County. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida, that the zoning of the following described property situated in Indian River County, Florida, to -wit: A PARCEL OF LAND BEING A PORTION OF LOTS 12 AND 13, KANSAS CITY COLONY SUBDIVISION, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF, RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 4, PAGE 23, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA, LYING WEST OF THE WEST RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF STATE ROAD AIA (OR BOOK 666, PAGE 1408), SAID PARCEL DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS; BEGIN AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE WEST RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF SAID STATE Attachmegt 4 Page 1 of 4 ROAD AlA AND THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID LOT 13; THENCE S 89°23'27"W, ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE, A DISTANCE OF 324.55 FEET; THENCE N 7°02'39"E A DISTANCE OF 10.69 FEET; THENCE N 19°00'54"W A DISTANCE OF 36.63 FEET; THENCE N 5010'27"E A DISTANCE OF 39.75 FEET; THENCE N 4°43'22"E A DISTANCE OF 23.23 FEET; THENCE N 9°13'49"W A DISTANCE OF 33.50 FEET; THENCE N 5°50'01"W A DISTANCE OF 43.92 FEET; THENCE N 11°03'18"W A DISTANCE OF 47.32 FEET; THENCE N 27000'46"W A DISTANCE OF 44.05 FEET; THENCE N 28°07'26"W A DISTANCE OF 24.81 FEET; THENCE N 29058'21"W A DISTANCE OF 8.16 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTH LINE OF SAID LOT 12; THENCE N 89023'27"E, ALONG SAID NORTH LINE, A DISTANCE OF 283.88 FEET TO A POINT ON THE AFOREMENTIONED WEST RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF STATE ROAD AIA; THENCE S 18°34'40"E, ALONG SAID LINE, A DISTANCE OF 311.50 FEET TO THE POINT OF CURVATURE OF A CURVE, CONCAVE TO THE EAST, HAVING A RADIUS OF 2914.93 FEET; THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 00 DEGREES 04 MINUTES 34 SECONDS A DISTANCE OF 3.87 FEET, TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. SAID PARCEL NOW LYING AND BEING IN INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA AND CONTAINING 2.009 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. SUBJECT TO EASEMENTS, RESERVATIONS, RESTRICTIONS AND RIGHTS-OF-WAY OF RECORD. is changed from RS -1, Single -Family Residential District (up to 1 units/acre) to RS -3, Single - Family Residential District (up to 3 units/acre) AND THAT PORTION OF LOTS 12 AND 13, KANSAS CITY COLONY SUBDIVISION, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF, RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 4, PAGE 23, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA, LYING WEST OF THE WEST RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF STATE ROAD AIA (OR BOOK 666, PAGE 1408) LESS AND EXCEPT ANY PORTION OF "NO NAME ISLAND" WHICH MAY OCCUR WITHIN LOTS 12 AND 13. ALL OF SAID PROPERTY NOW LYING AND BEING IN INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA. LESS AND EXCEPT THE FOLLOWING; BEGIN AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE WEST RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF SAID STATE ROAD AlA AND THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID LOT 13; THENCE S 89°23'27"W, ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE, A DISTANCE OF 324.55 FEET; THENCE N 7°02'39"E A DISTANCE OF 10.69 FEET; THENCE N 19°00'54"W A DISTANCE OF 36.63 FEET; THENCE N 5010'27"E A DISTANCE OF 39.75 FEET; THENCE N 4°43'22"E A DISTANCE OF 23.23 FEET; THENCE N 9°13'49"W A DISTANCE OF 33.50 FEET; THENCE N 5°50'01"W A DISTANCE OF 43.92 FEET; THENCE N 11°03'18"W A DISTANCE OF 47.32 FEET; THENCE N 27000'46"W A DISTANCE OF 44.05 FEET; THENCE N 28°07'26"W A DISTANCE OF 24.81 FEET; THENCE N 29'58'21"W A DISTANCE OF 8.16 FEET TO A 199 Page 2 of 4 ORDINANCE NO. 2018 - POINT ON THE NORTH LINE OF SAID LOT 12; THENCE N 89°23'27"E, ALONG SAID NORTH LINE, A DISTANCE OF 283.88 FEET TO A POINT ON THE AFOREMENTIONED WEST RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF STATE ROAD AIA; .THENCE S 18°34'40"E, ALONG SAID LINE, A DISTANCE OF 311.50 FEET TO THE POINT OF CURVATURE OF A CURVE, CONCAVE TO THE EAST, HAVING A RADIUS OF 2914.93 FEET; THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 00 DEGREES 04 MINUTES 34 SECONDS A DISTANCE OF 3.87 FEET, TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. SAID LAND LYING AND BEING IN INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA AND CONTAINING 4.872 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. SUBJECT TO EASEMENTS, RESERVATIONS, RESTRICTIONS AND RIGHTS-OF-WAY OF RECORD. is changed from RS -1, Single -Family Residential District (up to 1 units/acre) to CON -2, Estuarine Wetlands Conservation District (up to 1 unit/40 acres). All with the meaning and intent and as set forth and described in said Land Development Regulations. This ordinance shall become effective upon filing with the Department of State. Approved and adopted by the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida, on this 20th day of March, 2018. This ordinance was advertised in the Press -Journal on the 4t' day of March 2018, for a public hearing to be held on the 20' day of March, 2018 at which time it was moved for adoption by Commissioner , seconded by , and adopted by the following vote: Peter D. O'Bryan, Chairman Bob Solari, Vice Chairman Joseph E. Flescher, Commissioner Tim Zorc, Commissioner Susan Adams, Commissioner BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY Peter D. O'Bryan, Chairman ATTEST BY: Jeffrey Smith, Clerk Of Circuit Court and Comptroller This ordinance was filed with the Department of State on the following 200 Page 3 of 4 ORDINANCE NO. 2018 - date: APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGAL SUFFICIENCY William K. DeBraal, Deputy County Attorney APPROVED AS TO PLANNING MATTERS Stan Boling, AICP; Community Development Director FACommunity Development\Rezonings\Kane Rezoning - 2017080084 RSI to CON2 & RS3\Ordinance\Ordinance - Kane Rezoning.doc 201 Page 4 of 4 Treasure Coast Newspapers I TCPALM Indian River Press Journal 1801 U.S. 1, Vero Beach, FL 32960 AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF INDIAN RIVER Before the undersigned authority personally appeared, Natalie Zollar, who on oath says that she is Classified Inside Sales Manager of the Indian River Press Journal, a daily newspaper published at Vero Beach in Indian River County, Florida: that the attached copy of advertisement was published In the Indian River Press Journal in the following Issues below. Affiant further says that the said Indian River Press Journal Is a newspaper published in Vero Beach in said Indian River County, Florida, and that said newspaper has heretofore been continuously published in said Indian River County, Florida, daily and distributed in Indian River County, Florida, for a period of one year next preceding the first publication of the attached copy of advertisement; and affiant further says that she has neither paid or promised any person, firm or corporation any discount, rebate, commission or refund for the purpose of securing this advertisement for publication in the said newspaper. The Indian River Press Journal has been entered as Periodical Matter at the Post Offices in Vero Beach, Indian River County, Florida and has been for a period of one year next preceding the first publication of the attached copy of advertisement. Customer Ad Number Coovline PO # 463755 - INDIAN RIVER COUNTY PLANNING/CDD 1926666 KANE REZONING REQUEST Pub Dates March 4, 2018 Sworn to and subscribed before me this day of, March 05, 2018, by who is Natalie Zoll r (X) personally known to me or ( ) who has produced Karol Kangas Notary Public as identification. Ty, ao/- l KAROLEKANGAS Notary Public - State ofRoMe ", �' .?m nc�+' yCommm UntGG129,21 M Comm Ires1u129,20ti 9andedlMaghNagonrlgolmyAsm, as identification. Ty, ao/- l 26A 1 SUNDAY, MARCH 4,2018 1 TREASURE COAST NEWSPAPERS rc New lost jet search gives families hope Chdstd Hayes t6, Tow As families lit white candlesand remembered loved ones who vanished aboard Malaysia Airlines Flight 370, they were giv- en new hope Saturday that the world's biggest aviation mystery might soon be solved. It's been four leant since the plane, carrying 239 people, went missing over the Indian Ocean. A new search that Stretch- es across thousands of miles of the sea could likely conclude in June. Mataysla's civil avia- tion chief, Azhamddin Abdul Rahman, made the announcement Saturday at a remembrance event near Kuala Lumpur marking the plane's dis- appearance. "The whole world, In- cluding thenext of kin, have (new) hope to find the plane for closure; Az- hanlddin told The Asso- ciated Press. 'For the avi- ation world, we want to know what exactly hap- pened to the plane: Malaysia and Ocean Infinity, R company hased in Houston. Texas, mate to a deal in January to start a new search for the plane. The company will be paid only if aur, cessful. The official search by the Australia, Malaysia andChina governments was called off in January 2017 after nearly three years. Officials have said no transmissions were received from the aircraft otter Its first few minute In the alt, thus making the search very difficuh. Grace Nathan, whose mother was aboard the plane, told those at the remembrance that she lust wanted to under- stand what happened. 'We still really, really miss all the people we love," she said. -We still dont know what hap- pened to them" She and other family members wore shirts commemorating four years since their loved ones went missing. Ocean Infinity started the search on Jan. 22 and has 90 search days to look for the piano. Azha- mddln said time spent refueling the ship or lost to bad weather will not count against the 90 -day term, the Associated Press reported. The firm has not yet had any significant find - Ings. Pieces of debris from the craft have been found in the Indian Ocean and along Antras east coast, ofldals have said there was an 85 percent chance or finding the wreckage In a new 9,650 - square -tulle search area ' Ocean Infinity 820.11 yi • lion for L930 square -./.z.tasamr act roast miles of a successful 1 - search, 830 million for 5,790 square miles, 850 million for 9,653 imrF) _ TI T �T yQ square miles and 870 million tfthe plane or iy Dight recorders are found Retatives of victims of beyond the Identified Malaysian Alrthre, Flight aMaccevdingtotheAs- 370 hold candles at a sociated Press. remembrance mm—ny Theplane vanished Saturday. Four years March 8, 2014, while fly - after the jet and Its 239 Ing from Kuala Lumpur to passengers and crew Beijing. vanished, a new search The passengers on has started. rAzav board represented 14 na- rsNan/Ivrsrr tionalitles and included couple returning to their sons after a beach get- - roughly the size r Ver- away and a construction Mont - Identified by ex- worker making his first perts, but the firm did not trip home In ayear. want to give families too Investigators have not much hope. determined what went If the mission Is suc- wrong on the plane, and cessful within three theories have ranged months, payment will be from terrorism M me - made based on the size of chemical failures to disin- the area searched. Ma- tegrating In mid-air. Laysia says it will pay None have been proven. Affordable "I\ton-huger" Solutions, Llc. 4 Est 1996 ,111"T.LSrs n1aRc �ItimbcrlJA Temple R—aLTTtn_mme.. tis A'Aii ora ^�I I Trina M. Laughlin, LCSW Adult Psychotherapy Services Specializing in Trauma n/wbdmcvfir Thuile! 9(2212 - alar �ELLE�,.r NarT OUn urlwln00lh rtNl rWAi rtNWI�Y• ICOIVRECO SHoEs 567-3168 i Your comfort & support specialist 845 7th Ave •Vero Beach• FL ... .oiasonlm., ry ao.,a..,x �CUISSItII/ICN[STRt ,,U �' O . lamp "All I\.„ IN(etN l GN in J, S1ulphomNO. /' O `�� ` Ilute llArpConecrio rl �� Sercuata Nollurna -- Al Alarch 15 . 7::301"h. �{ Y\Ia\ ('ralrr for' I Mr 1'errmwliag.Srls \'rro Orath Piano Concerict To. :3 April 5 . 7::30r. R aslav Cralrr for the l'-f—ivig Any \'rro Itra.It 772.460.0850 www.AtlanticClassicalOrchestra.com 06e VERO Serving Vero Beach °o0 RENAL Area Since 2004 Richard Handler, M.D. Ana Taveras, M.D. Cristina Badescu, M.D. Y r t �1 Specializing in HYPERTENSION AND KIDNEY DISEASE. 777 37th Street, Ste. C-107, Vero Beach, FL 32960 772-562-3234 verorenal.com G Enjoy fine dining = and hotel -like amenities. w ,f .l , Lola,fPrivate , Apartments NI Ir•aa•c nn fb Itv 24/7 - ti• S , r $a�ul.v� StMOR LING Vera Brrh Schedule your tour today) 772-770-3796 vrvuw.Sol a rlsHea IthCare.org BEFORE THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS INDIAN RIVER COUNTY NOTICE OF REZONING - PUBLIC HEARING The Board of County cammissbners of I ndian River County, Florida, will consider the adoption of a county ordinance rezoning land within the unincorporated portions of Indian River County. A public hearing at which parties in Interest and citizem shall have an opportunity to be heard, will be held on Tuesday, March 20, 2018, at 8:00 a.m. In the County Commission Chambers of the County Administration Building A located at 1801 27th Street, Vero Beach, Florida. The proposed ordinance to rezone the subject property is entitled: AN ORDINANCE OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE AND THE ACCOMPANYING ZONING MAP FOR APPROKIM.ATELY x2.009 ACRES LOCATED WEST OF SOUTH HIGHWAY AIA AND NORTH OF ROUND ISLAND RIVERSIDE PARK, FROM RS - 1, SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (UP TO 1 UNfT/ACRE), TO RS -3, SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (UP TO 3 UNITS/ACRE); AND x 4.827 ACRES LOCATED WEST AND ADJACENT TO AFORESAID PROPERTY FROM RS -1, SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (UP TO 1 UNIT/ACRE), TO CON -2, ESTUARINE WETLANDS CONSERVATION DISTRICT (UP TO 1 UNIT/40 ACRES); AND PROVIDING CODIFICATION, SEVERABILITY, AND EFFECTIVE DATE. The rezoning application may be inspected by the public at the Community Development Department of the County Administration Building A, located at 1801 27th Street, Vero Beech, Florida, between the hours of 8:30 am. and 5:00 p.m. on weekdays. For more information, contact BIII Schutt at (772) 226-1243. The Board of County Commissioners may adopt another zoning district, other than the district requested, provided that the adopted zoning district is consistent with the county's comprehensive plan. Anyone who may wish to appeal any decision that may be made at this meeting will need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings Is made, which includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is based. Anyone who needs a special accommodation for this meeting must contact the County's Americans vnth Disabilities Act Coordinator at (772) 226-1223, at least 48 hours in advance of the meeting. Indian River County Board of County Commissioners By -s- Peter D. O'Bryan, Chairman Dimas Z... We s.ae eml�s aeaw,t a -- -./.z.tasamr act roast •/•caz),v,., --1.nea.2 y INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA MEMORANDUM TO: Jason E. Brown; County Administrator THROUGH: Stan Boling, AICP; Community Development Director THROUGH: Sasan Rohani, AICP Chief, Long -Range Planning FROM: Bill Schutt, AICP Senior Economic Development Planner, Long Range Planning DATE: March 5, 2018 SUBJECT: TRANSMITTAL PUBLIC HEARING: County Initiated Request to Amend (Update) the Text of the Sanitary Sewer Sub -Element for Septic to Sewer Conversion and the Associated Text of the Future Land Use Element; and Amend the Text of the Coastal Management Element for Sea Level Rise and Associated Text of the Future Land Use Element of the County's Comprehensive Plan It is requested that the data herein presented be given formal consideration by the Board of County Commissioners at its regular meeting of March 20, 2018. DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS This is a county initiated request and contains two parts to amend the text of the Sanitary Sewer Sub - Element, Coastal Management Element, and Future Land Use Element of the county's comprehensive plan. The first part consists of proposed revisions to the Sanitary Sewer Sub -Element and parallel Future Land Use Element changes to update information and incorporate recent policy direction from the Board of County Commissioners regarding conversion of septic systems to public sewer service. The second part consists of proposed revisions to the Coastal Management Element and Future Land Use Element to address planning for sea level rise impacts as mandated by the state. This agenda item reviews proposed revisions to the Sanitary Sewer Sub -Element. The Coastal Management Element and Future Land Use Element revisions related to sea level rise are addressed in a separate agenda item that will be presented immediately after consideration of this item. For all three elements/sub-elements, the purpose of the amendments is to update policies and text to recognize changed conditions. With respect to the Sanitary Sewer Sub -Element, proposed revisions were initiated based on direction received at the July 18, 2017 Board of County Commissioners (Board) meeting (Attachment #2). 2021 Comprehensive Plan Amendment Review Procedures Although the number of plan amendments that the county may consider is not limited, the County's Comprehensive Plan regulates the frequency with which the county may amend its comprehensive plan. According to the county's Comprehensive Plan, plan amendments are limited to four times per calendar year. For that reason, the county accepts general plan amendment applications only during the "window" months of January, April, July and October. In this case, the subject application for revisions to the three comprehensive plan elements/sub-elements was submitted during the January 2018 window. The procedures for reviewing a comprehensive plan amendment involve several steps. First, the Planning and Zoning Commission (PZC), as the Local Planning Agency, conducts a public hearing to review the request. At the public hearing, the Commission makes a recommendation to the Board of County Commissioners (Board) to approve, approve with modifications, or deny the requested amendment. Following PZC action, the Board conducts two public hearings. The first of those hearings is for a preliminary decision on the amendment request. At that hearing, the Board determines whether or not the amendment warrants transmittal to state and regional review agencies for their consideration. If the amendment is transmitted, state and regional review agencies review the amendment as it pertains to each agency's area of focus. Review agencies then send their comments directly to the county and the State Land Planning Agency. Subsequent to staff and/or the applicant addressing any issues raised in the review agency comments, a second and final Board public hearing is conducted. If the Board approves the request at the final hearing, then the approved amendment is submitted to the State Land Planning Agency and to the other review agencies. The amendment becomes effective 31 days after the State Land Planning Agency determines that the approved amendment submittal is complete, unless a challenge is filed by an affected party. PZC Action At its regular meeting of February 8, 2018, the Planning & Zoning Commission (PZC) conducted a public hearing, considered the subject amendment, and voted 5-0 to recommend that the Board of County Commissioners approve the proposed amendment with a modification to policy 5.6 of the Sanitary Sewer Sub -Element to add language regarding the County's commitment to pursue and identify all opportunities for funding septic to sewer projects (see Attachment #3). Based on PZC direction, language has since been added to policy 5.6 of the Sanitary Sewer. Sub -Element to state that the County will identify and pursue funding opportunities for septic to sewer projects and sewer connections. Board Transmittal Public Hearing The subject "transmittal" public hearing is the second step in the Comprehensive Plan amendment process. At this time, the Board of County Commissioners must decide whether or not to transmit the proposed amendments to the Sanitary Sewer Sub -Element, the Coastal Management Element, and the Future Land Use Element to state and regional review agencies. If the Board votes to transmit this amendment, it will be scheduled for a final Board hearing in June or July.' 203 2 BackSround On March 8, 2016, the Board of County Commissioners directed the Indian River County Department of Utilities Services (IRCDUS) to evaluate a countywide septic to sewer conversion plan based on a phased approach, as follows: • Phase I: Develop a comprehensive priority ranking plan'along with cost estimates for potential projects • Phase 11: Incorporate the ranking plan into the county comprehensive plan • Phase III: Identify financing options and public outreach • Phase IV: Encumber funds and implement priority projects On July 18, 2017 the Board reviewed and approved a countywide septic to sewer conversion evaluation/ranking report prepared for the county by Schulke, Bittle & Stoddard, LLC. That report met the requirements of Phase I of the county's overall septic to sewer plan and included a review and ranking of 325 subdivisions served by septic systems, identification of a top 35 list of those subdivisions with the highest impact on the Indian River Lagoon, and an Engineers Opinion of Probable Cost for a septic to sewer conversion project for each of the top 35 ranked subdivisions. Upon approval of the countywide septic to sewer conversion evaluation/ranking report (completion of Phase 1), the Board directed Community Development Department staff to initiate Phase II to incorporate the findings of the report into the Sanitary Sewer Sub -Element of the comprehensive plan. Consistent with that Board direction, Community Development Department staff coordinated with IRCDUS staff and Florida Department of Health in Indian River County (DOH — Indian River) staff and prepared the attached proposed amendments to the Sanitary Sewer Sub -Element of the county's comprehensive plan (Attachment 4) and parallel amendments to the Future Land Use Element of the county's comprehensive plan (Attachment 5). In those attachments, proposed changes are shown with strike and underline format. The amendments involve changing target dates for policy completion, deleting out of date text and policies, removing/revising out-of-date references, adding new policies and text based on the recently adopted septic to sewer ranking plan, and updating maps and tables. ANALYSIS Pursuant to the Board's direction and requests from county departments/divisions, 20 policies, 3 objectives, and various texts and maps of non -policy sections of the Sanitary Sewer Sub -Element of the county's comprehensive plan are proposed to be revised. Related parallel minor edits to the text and 2 policies are proposed in the Future Land Use Element of the county's comprehensive plan. Many of the proposed text updates relate to removing/updating out-of-date references, adding clarification through re -wording, and adding additional detail to bring both the Sanitary Sewer Sub - Element and Future Land Use Element up-to-date. With respect to the Board's direction related to septic systems and septic to sewer conversion, extensive updates have been made to the "Septic Systems" subsection of the Sanitary Sewer Sub -Element. That text begins on page 19 with a review of recent statistics on septic systems, a description of how a septic system operates, maintenance issues, and design requirements for septic systems. That sub -section ends with a review of the recently completed Septic to Sewer study and the results of that study, including the list of the top 35 subdivisions served by septic systems and having a highly ranked priority for septic to sewer conversion. 2043 With respect to the Sanitary Sewer Sub -Element several policies and two objectives have been updated to implement items from the approved septic to sewer conversion study. Those updated portions of the sub -element include Objective 2 and Objective 7, and Policies 2.3, 2.4, 2.6, 2.7, and 4.2. Collectively the updates reflect the County's decision to reduce septic system impacts on the Indian River Lagoon and St. Sebastian River by targeting high ranking septic to sewer projects based on the approved septic to sewer study. For each proposed change, the following two summary tables identifies the policy #, objective #, whether the change is to the non -policy text portion of the plan, the associated page proposed for amendment, and a brief description of the proposed change. Summary Table 1 relates to the Sanitary Sewer Sub -Element, and Summary Table 2 relates to the Future Land Use Element. Table 1: Sanitary Sewer Sub -Element - Summary of Proposed Edits Pages (Objective ) *Policy Description Various Updated agency names/departments responsible for various activities. Various Removed old/outdated references. Various Minor text edits. Various Updated maps. 7 Updated design capacity of Blue Cypress Sanitary Sewer Package Facility. 9 Additional detail added for `By -Product Disposal". 10 Updated text describing discharge and re -use of effluent. 10-13 Updated current demand at County Regional Plants. 14 Updated sludge and septage disposal location & effluent disposal method for COVB Plant. 15 Updated summary table for County and COVB regional wastewater treatments stems. 19 Added history and current statistics on septic systems in County. Updated explanation of how a septic system functions. Added additional detail, including minimum size/capacities of septic systems and agency responsible for permitting. 20 Updated list of factors that makes septic systems challenging to permit. 21-22 Added information on life expectancy of septic systems, historic and current design criteria, problems with septic systems, and maintenance recommendations. Added explanation regarding allowance for development and re -development of undersized lots and the allowance for septic systems that do not meet current requirements. 22-24 Included text regarding the County's recently completed study that recognizes areas and subareas of the County in close proximity to the Indian River Lagoon, St. Sebastian River, and connecting waterways that are served by septic systems and have a higher negative impact on the lagoon water quality. Added a list of subdivisions for septic to sewer conversion within the Unincorporated Indian River County and City of Sebastian. 25-26 Updated state statute and Florida Administrative Code references and updated text to include DOH -Indian River as the administrator for the IRC septic system program. Updated criteria for when connection to wastewaters stems is required. 27-28 Updated text on service areas for the County and City of Vero Beach. 30 Misc. text changes. 31 Updated table that lists typical concentrations for household wastewater, septic tank effluent and wastewater treatment plant effluent. 2054 Table 1: Sa itary Sewer Sub -Element — Summary of Proposed Edits Cont'd Pages Description (Objective ) *Policy 32-33 Comparison of old (prior to 1983) and current (post 1983) design requirements and challenges of using septic systems in Indian River County ........ physical limitations, including a discussion on soils and suitability/unsuitability for septic systems and a discussion on inadequate depth of water table. Problems with not maintaining a septic system and inability to recognize the existence of groundwater and surface water contamination until septic backs up into a home. 34 Added text,suggesting conditions under which the County may want to consider imposing retrofitting existing development and updating the criteria/conditions for when older areas need to be switched from private septic systems to public sewer. 36 Removed outdated text that discussed the need to expand sewer plants. 37 Updated to only reference the Capital Improvements Element for the County's annually updated 5 year capital improvements program (no longer as an attachment to the Sanitary Sewer Sub -Element). 41 Changed "county utilities department" to "DEP" as responsible entity to inspect private -*Policy 1.2 wastewater treatment plants in Indian River County. 41 Removed the word "tank" from "septic tank systems". *Policy 1.6 42 Moved the completion date out from 2015 to 2025. Increased the % from 50% to 60% of all (Objective 2) existing units in the county's urban service area will be connected to the county's regional sewer system. Updated to include 2017 % of existing units that are connected to the county's regional sanitary sewer system. 42 Replaced the word "service" with "systems" in the sentence "The county shall continue to *Policy 2.1 offer the utility assessment program to areas with septic service....". 42 Updated to reference Table 3.A.3 for priority subdivisions for connection to public sewer *Policy 2.3 systems due to public health threats. 42 Updated to reference Table 3.A.3.1 and to indicate that the County will provide "public" *Policy 2.4 sanitary service to areas where the lack of service is determined to be a public health threat and shall initiate sanitary sewer projects where feasible to serve priority subdivisions. 42 Deleted old policy that referred to coordinating with the City of Vero Beach and Town of *Policy 2.6 Indian River Shores to prepare a financial analysis for consolidating utility services. Added new policy for the county to perform a financial analysis for septic to sewer conversion projects by 2018 and to identify a list of subdivisions to connect to the public sewer system and dates of connection. 43 New policy to require the county to connect at least five subdivisions identified in Table *Policy 2.7 3.A.3.1 to public sanitary sewer with costs to be recovered from those connecting to and directlybenefiting from the system 43 Edited policy to indicate that inspection results for heavy commercial and industrial uses *Policy 3.1 "may" (instead of "shall") be used to guide decisions for sanitary sewer service expansion. Additional minor text edits. 43 Edited policy to require samplings of on-site sewage systems of hazardous waste *Policy 3.3 generators. 2065 Table 1: Sa itary Sewer Sub -Element — Summary of Proposed Edits Cont'd Pages Description (Objective ) *Policy 43 Modified to "encourage" rather than "require" large volume irrigation users to use reuse *Policy 4.2 water for irrigation. 44 Clarifies that new subdivisions over 25 lots/units must connect to a county water "re -use *Policy 4.4 line". 44 Changed completion date for implementation of the Capital Improvements Element from *Objective 5 "2014" to "2022" and updated to only reference the Capital Improvements Element for the County's annually updated 5 year capital improvements program (no longer as an attachment to the Sanitary Sewer Sub -Element). 44 Minor text edit to direct reader to the Capital Improvements Element. *Policy 5.1 45 Minor text edit to refer to "impact fees' as "capacity charges". *Policy 5.5 45 Updated to add language regarding the County's commitment to identify and pursue -*Policy 5.6 opportunities for funding septic to sewer projects and sewer connections. 47 Changed "county utilities department" to "DEP" as responsible entity to inspect package *Policy 6.4 treatment plants in Indian River County. 48 Reduced the number of new septic systems that the County will permit annually by the year *Objective 7 2020 from 450 to 200. 48 Removed exception that allowed the use of septic systems to continue in residential *Policy 7.1 subdivisions other than those subdivisions listed in Table 3.A.3. Text edits to remove the word "tank" from "Septic tanks stems". 49 Updated to include reference to state statute. Minor text edits to address name changes. -*Policy 7.2 49 Updated to reference DOH — Indian River's involvement and statutory requirements for *Policy 7.3 repair and replacement of septic sstems. 49 Updated minor texts to address name changes. Updated to reference SepticSearch.com as a *Policy 7.4 source of information. 49 Added new policy to encourage a voluntary opt -in provision for septic system maintenance *Policy 7.5 and to report maintenance activities. 49 Added new policy to encourage voluntary septic system repairs and modifications to meet Volicy 7.6 current design requirements. 51-53 Updated Summary Table 3.A.6 to reflect policy changes. Turn page (This space intentionally left blank). 2076 Table 2: Future Land Use Element — Summary of Proposed Edits Pages Description (Objective ) *Policy 46, 63-64, 78- Numerous text edits to replace the word "septic tank" with "septic system". 79,85 & 87 63 Updated county sewer and septic statistics. 63 Changed "Indian River County Public Health Unit, Division of Environmental Health" to "Department of Health in Indian River County (DOH -Indian River)". 78 & 79 Changed "Environmental Health Department" to "DOH -Indian River". 164 Text edit to replace the word "septic tank" with "septic system". -*Policy 7.7 165 Text edit to replace the word "septic tank" with "septic system". Changed "Environmental *Policy 7.11 Health Department" to "DOH -Indian River". Consistency with Comprehensive Plan Comprehensive Plan amendment requests are reviewed for consistency with all applicable policies of the comprehensive plan. As per section 800.07(1) of the county code, the "Comprehensive Plan may only be amended in such a way as to preserve the internal consistency of the plan. For a proposed amendment to be consistent with the plan, the amendment must be consistent with the goals, objectives and policies of the comprehensive plan. Policies are statements in the plan, which identify actions the county will take in order to direct the community's development. As courses of action committed to by the county, policies provide the basis for all county land development related decisions -including plan amendment decisions. While all comprehensive plan objectives and policies are important, some have more applicability than others in reviewing plan amendment requests. Of particular applicability for this request is Policy 14.3. Future Land Use Element Policy 14.3 In evaluating a comprehensive plan amendment request, the most important consideration is Future Land Use Element Policy 14.3. This policy requires that one of four criteria be met in order to approve a comprehensive plan amendment request. These criteria are: • The proposed amendment will correct an oversight in the approved plan; • The proposed amendment will correct a mistake in the approved plan; • The proposed amendment is warranted based on a substantial change in circumstances ; or • The proposed amendment involves a swap or reconfiguration of land use designations at separate sites, and that swap or reconfiguration will not increase the overall land use density or intensity depicted on the Future Land Use Map. In this case, the proposed Sanitary Sewer Sub -Element and corresponding land use element amendments meet Policy 14.3's third criterion. The proposed changes were either directed by the Board, or requested by a local agency/organization or staff due to changes in circumstances. For the proposed Sanitary Sewer Sub -Element and corresponding Future Land Use Element amendments, changed circumstances include the need to update outdated information and references, the need to 2087 provide more feasible implementation dates, and the need to implement new policy recommendations from the recently approved septic to sewer study. Summary of Consistency with the Comprehensive Plan While Policy 14.3 is particularly applicable to this request, other Comprehensive Plan policies and objectives also have relevance. For that reason, staff evaluated the subject request for consistency with all applicable plan policies and objectives. Based upon that analysis, staff determined that the request is consistent with the County's Comprehensive Plan. CONCLUSION Staff's position is that updating the county's Sanitary Sewer Sub -Element and corresponding portions of the Future Land. Use Element, as proposed, is warranted based on changes in circumstances including the Board's desire to implement recommendations from the recently approved septic to sewer study, and to ensure that the county's comprehensive plan remains current and accurate. RECOMMENDATION: Based on the analysis, staff and the Planning and Zoning Commission recommend that the Board of County Commissioners adopt the attached resolution for transmittal of the following proposed Comprehensive Plan text amendments to state and regional review agencies: 1. Amendments to: a. The Sanitary Sewer Sub -Element and corresponding Future Land Use Element, and b. The Coastal Management Element and related Future Land Use Element after review and consideration of the next staff report, and 2. Announce its intention to hold and advertise a final public hearing at the adoption stage of the plan amendment process. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Comprehensive Plan Text Amendment Application 2. July 5, 2017 Board of County Commissioners Agenda Item — Countywide Septic to Sewer Conversion Evaluation/Ranking Report — Results 3. Unapproved Minutes of the February 8, 2018 Planning and Zoning Commission meeting 4. Proposed Revisions to the Sanitary Sewer Sub -Element 5. Proposed Revisions to the Future Land Use Element 6. Transmittal Resolution FACommunity Development\Comprehensive Plan Text Amendments\2017 Sewer Policy Update\StaffReport\13CC staffreport for Sanitary Sewer Text amendment - March 2018.docx 209 8 r. APPLICATION FORM COMPREHKNSIVE PLAN TEXT AMENDMENT (CPTA) INDIAN RIVER COUNTY Planning Division accepts Comprehensive Plan Text Amendment OCT 2 17 Rf-rP - ? 1 i 0M oniyt ciurifi ' the months of January, April, July and October of each year (exceptt Caiiif' Improvements Element Amendments may be initiated by the County anytigFth `Oti year in accordance with Florida Statutes, Section 163.3177(3)(b)). Each app licarb -�$n be complete when submitted and must include all required attachments. An incomplete application will not be processed and will be returnedtothe applicant. t y �w�vse (�rdt l�� 1= � eme4 eoasl-wi M�n�gen E I era En , �j'cet�; rar S -e ste; 51110 i_ef-,eA+ Assigned Project Number: CPTA - L20 I'I / U 4 0 ff — S 63 74 Signature of Owner or Agent: Please attach the following items to this application. Do not ignore any of the following items. Indicate "N/A" if an item is not applicable. What is the proposed amendment's citation in the Comprehensive Plan? Include the element or sub -element, page number, and if applicable, the objective and policy number(s). Revise several elements of the County's Comprehensive Plan. 2. What is the exact language proposed to be added and/or deleted from the plan? Various changes. 3. What is the purpose of the request? Minor text updates. 4. What is the justification for the request? Change in conditions. Provide an analysis of the proposed amendment's consistency with all applicable goals, objectives, and policies of the comprehensive plan. NA Provide an analysis of the proposed amendment's impact on public facilities and services. NA Provide an analysis of the proposed amendment's environmental impacts. NA 8. Provide a check, money order or cash in the amount of $NA , made payable to Indian River County. THE APPLICANT MUST ATTEND A PRE -APPLICATION CONFERENCE WITH LONG-RANGE PLANNING SECTION STAFF PRIOR TO APPLYING. FACommunity Development\Comprehensive Plan Text AmendmentsUanuary 2016\CPTA FORM.doc Attachment@ l Current Owner/Applicant Agent Name: Indian River County Board of County Commissioners Community Development Department Staff Complete Mailing Address: 180127" Street, Vero Beach, FL 32960-3365 Same Phone # (including area code) (772) 226 — 1243 Same Fax #(including area code (772) 978 — 1806 Same E -Mail: Contact Person: Bill Schutt Signature of Owner or Agent: Please attach the following items to this application. Do not ignore any of the following items. Indicate "N/A" if an item is not applicable. What is the proposed amendment's citation in the Comprehensive Plan? Include the element or sub -element, page number, and if applicable, the objective and policy number(s). Revise several elements of the County's Comprehensive Plan. 2. What is the exact language proposed to be added and/or deleted from the plan? Various changes. 3. What is the purpose of the request? Minor text updates. 4. What is the justification for the request? Change in conditions. Provide an analysis of the proposed amendment's consistency with all applicable goals, objectives, and policies of the comprehensive plan. NA Provide an analysis of the proposed amendment's impact on public facilities and services. NA Provide an analysis of the proposed amendment's environmental impacts. NA 8. Provide a check, money order or cash in the amount of $NA , made payable to Indian River County. THE APPLICANT MUST ATTEND A PRE -APPLICATION CONFERENCE WITH LONG-RANGE PLANNING SECTION STAFF PRIOR TO APPLYING. FACommunity Development\Comprehensive Plan Text AmendmentsUanuary 2016\CPTA FORM.doc Attachment@ l INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF UTILITY SERVICES Date: July 5, 2017 To: Jason E. Brown, County Administrator From: Vincent Burke, P.E., Director of Utility Services Prepared By: Arjuna Weragoda, P.E., Capital Projects Manager Subject: Countywide Septic to Sewer Conversion Evaluation/Ranking Report — Results DESCRIPTIONS AND CONDITIONS: On October 18, 2016, under Consent Agenda Item 8-G, the Indian River County Board of County Commissioners (BCC) authorized staff to proceed in the development of a more comprehensive septic to sewer (S2S) priority ranking plan along with cost estimates for platted subdivisions currently on septic. As part of that approval, the BCC approved Work Order No. 2 for Schulke, Bittle & Stoddard, LLC, (SBS) to provide professional engineering services for a comprehensive countywide S2S priority ranking study based upon various physical and environmental factors as well as construction cost estimates. The study focused on platted subdivisions within the unincorporated Indian River County and City of Sebastian. ANALYSIS: SBS has completed the evaluation, and the entire report is attached as part of the subject staff report. The goal of the evaluation is to prioritize the areas based upon various physical and environmental factors, and determine the feasibility of incorporating the proposed systems into the 10 -year Capital Improvements Plan. An IRC -specific formula was developed and modeled after similar studies for Martin County (Martin County Septic System Evaluation Final Report; CapTec Engineering, Inc.; February 13, 2015) and Brevard County (Save Our Lagoon Project Plan for Brevard County, Florida; TetraTech, Inc and Close Waters LLC; July 28, 2016). The IRC formula was modified from the Martin and Brevard studies to consider and weigh physical and environmental factors that SBS and IRCDUS staff determined to be best representation of Indian River County conditions. The following factors were utilized in the initial ranking of the three hundred and twenty-five (325) platted subdivisions currently on septic: • Population Density for Loading Concentrations • Proximity to Surface Waters • Location of the Community in Relation to the 100 -year Flood Plain — FEMA Flood Plain • Depth of the Ground Water Table • Soil Conditions of the Drain Field — Soil Type • Age of the Surface Water Management System • Age of the Existing Onsite Sewage Treatment and Disposal Systems (OSTDS) Each factor was evaluated and assigned an index number that generally ranged from 0 to 12, with 0 being the minimum and 12 being the maximum impact. The formula used to determine the ranking is simply the sum of all the factors. The higher the resulting sum (the "score"), the higher the estimated impact to the Indian River Lagoon (IRL). This formula, initially developed for the Martin and Brevard Attachmenit 2 studies, weighed each factor relatively equally. However, SBS and IRCDUS staff agree that both factors, "Population Density" and "Proximity to Surface Waters", should be weighed more heavily. It is believed that these factors, at their worst conditions (systems close to surface waters communities with high density), will likely cause a disproportionately higher impact to the environment. Consequently, each of these factors, "Population Density" and "Proximity to Surface Waters", were adjusted by an "importance factor" that ranged from 1.0 to 2.0. The 325 subdivisions were ranked in the order of the overall score, where number 1 had the highest overall score (89.19) and number 325 the lowest (26.97). Once the initial ranking was finalized, an Engineers Opinion of Probable Cost (OPC) was computed for the top thirty five (35) ranked subdivisions. The top ranked subdivisions were further evaluated based on the following factors: 1. Aquatic Health - Environmental Impact Evaluation or the Initial Ranking 2. Sewer System Evaluation and Cost Data 3. TN/TP Efficiency - Since most references and studies showed that Phosphorus was removed by a functioning OSTDS, the TP efficiency computations were removed from the analysis 4. Public Health - Based on the availability of potable water The SBS study evaluated the total nitrogen (TN) and total phosphorus (TP) removed from the S2S conversion for each individual area and computed a cost per pound for TN removal on the top 35 ranked subdivisions. TP (as noted above) computations were removed from the analysis. As part of the evaluation, average and peak wastewater flows generated by each of the top 35 ranked subdivisions were tabulated. By using the methodology described in the study, the top thirty five (35) ranking subdivisions have been identified with the highest overall rating (largest potential impact to IRL) within the geographical area in Indian River County to benefit from a centralized sewer system as follows. Rank Subdivision Name Rank Subdivision Name Rank Subdivision Name 1 Floravon Shores Subdivision 14 Sebastian Highlands Unit 02 Replat PG 2 24 Dales Landing Subdivision Tropic Colony Subdivision 2 Sebastian Highlands Unit 02 Collier 14 Hobart Landing Unit 3 24 Ames ( )—** 3 Sebastian Highlands Unit 05 16 River Shores Estates Units 1- 4 29 Winter Grove Subdivision 4 Hobart Landing Unit 2 17 Pine Tree Park Units 1-4 29 Kanawah Acres 5 Orchid Island No. 2 17 Indian River Heights Units 1 9 31 Tropic Colony Subdivision 5 Sebastian Highlands Unit 04 17 Sebastian Highlands Unit 02 Replat PG 3 32 Halleluiah Acres 7 Orchid Island No. 1 20 Rain Tree Corner Subdivision 33 Little Portion Subdivision Replat OF 8 Sebastian Highlands Unit 01 21 Diana Park Subdivision 34 Sebastian Highlands Unit 02 Replat PG 4 * 8 Ambersand Beach Sub No 1 & 2 22 Verona Estates Subdivision 35 Heritage Trace at Hobart* 10 Sebastian Highlands Unit 03 22 Sebastian Highlands Unit 13; Little Portion Subdivision Replat Of 11 Sebastian Highlands Unit 02 24 Hobart Landing Unit 1 11 Naranja TR Shellmound Bch Replat of POR 24 Hallmark Ocean Subdivision 13 i Orchid Isle Estates Subdivision 24 Stevens Park Unit 1 & 2 * These communities are included in the evaluation due to their proximity to one or more top 30 ranked communities. ** It is recommended that the Amos subdivision not be considered in the capital improvement program. Ranking results are due to an anomaly in the methodology. Attachment 2 \\10.176.2.252\granicus_nas\insite\files\IRCG\Attachments\579debbe-7f6f-46be-a910-53 aa2b098132.doc 212 FUNDING: There is no funding required for the report delivery. On October 18, 2016, the BCC approved Work Order No. 2 for Schulke, Bittle & Stoddard, funded from the Utilities Capital Fund in the amount of $86,300. Capital fund revenues are generated from impact fees. Furthermore, new growth has created the need for the expansion or construction of the facilities, and that new growth will benefit from the expansion or construction of the facilities. On March 7, 2017, the BCC recommended the adoption of Resolution No. 2017-021 authorizing signatory authority to the County Administrator for finalizing the agreement accepting a Technical Assistance Grant in the amount of $35,000 from the Department of Economic Opportunity (DEO). This grant reduced the amount funded from the Utilities Capital Fund to $51,300. Description Account Number Amount Countywide Septic to Sewer 472-169000-17501 $51,300.00 DEO Technical Assistance Grant $35,000.00 Total Funding for Report $86,300.00 RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the following Countywide Septic to Sewer Ranking by adopting the report prepared by Schulke, Bittle & Stoddard, LLC. Work with Community Development Long Range planning staff to incorporate the findings into the IRC 2030 Comprehensive Plan Chapter 3A, Sanitary Sewer Sub -Element for BCC review and approval at a later date. Make the report available on-line. ATTACHMENT(s): Countywide Septic to Sewer Ranking Report by Schulke, Bittle & Stoddard, LLC (57 Pages) Attachment 2 \\10.176.2.252\granicus_nas\insite\files\IRCG\Attachments\579debbe-7f6f-46be-a910-53aa2b098132.doc 213 PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION There was a meeting of the Indian River County (IRC) Planning and Zoning Commission (PZC) on Thursday, February 8, 2018 at 7:00 p.m. in the Commission Chambers of the County Administration Building, 1801 27th Street, Vero Beach, Florida. You may hear an audio of the meeting; review the meeting agenda, backup material and the minutes on the Indian River County website www.ircqov.com/Boards/PZC/2015. Present were members: Chairman Alan Polackwich Sr., District 2 Appointee; Vice Chairman Todd Brognano, Member -at -Large; Mr. Chip Landers, District 3 Appointee; Ms. Angela Waldrop, District 5 Appointee; and Mr. Jordan Stewart, Member -at -Large. Mr. Patrick Grall, District 1 Appointee; Dr. Jonathan Day, District 4 Appointee; and Mr. Shawn Frost, non-voting School Board Liaison, were absent. Also present was IRC staff: Mr. Bill DeBraal, Deputy County Attorney; Mr. Stan Boling, Community Development Director; Mr. William Schutt, Senior Economic Development Planner; Ms. Cheryl Dunn, Environmental Health Manager; Mr. Vincent Burke, Utility Services Director; Mr. Roland DeBlois, Environmental and Code Enforcement Chief; Mr. Steven Hitt, Senior Environmental Planner; and Ms. Lisa Carlson, Recording Secretary. Call to Order and Pledge of Allegiance The meeting was called to order at 7:00 p.m. and all stood for the Pledge of Allegiance. Additions and Deletions to the Agenda There were none Approval of Minutes ON MOTION BY Mr. Brognano, SECONDED BY Ms. Waldrop, the members voted unanimously (5-0) to approve the minutes of the January 25, 2018 meeting as presented. Items on Consent Chairman Polackwich read the following into the record: PZC/Unapproved 1 February 8, 2018 F:\BCCWII Committees\P&Z\2018—AGENDAS & MINUTES\PZC 020818.doc 214 A. 5311 Street / US 1 Commercial Subdivision (Replat): Request for preliminary plat approval to replat a portion of the 53rd Street / US 1 commercial subdivision. Vero Investment 53, LLC, Owner. Indian River Donuts, Inc., Applicant. Todd N. Smith, P.E. Inc., Agent. Located at the southwest corner of 53rd Street and US Highway 1. Zoning: CG, General Commercial. Land Use Designation: C/I Commercial/ Industrial. (SD -17-11-07/2007090011-79977) [Quasi -Judicial] Chairman Polackwich asked the Commissioners to reveal any ex -parte communication with the applicant or any conflict that would not allow them to make an unbiased decision. The members stated that they had not had any ex - parte communication. ON MOTION BY Mr. Brognano, SECONDED BY Mr. Landers, the members voted unanimously (5-0) to approve staff recommendations on this Quasi - Judicial matter. Public Hearings Chairman Polackwich read the following into the record: A. CONTINUATION FROM JANUARY 25, 2018: Schwerin and Others Request to Rezone +/- 17.94 acres from MED to CG (RZON-99070136- '80287) and County's Request to Rezone +/- 0.20 acres from MED to CG (RZON-2018010067-81006). [Quasi -Judicial] Chairman Polackwich stated that as this public hearing is continued from the last Board meeting and was not closed, anyone that was sworn in at that time is still under oath. He asked that anybody present that was not sworn in at the last meeting and wishes to testify take the oath at this time. Nobody came forward. Chairman Polackwich asked the Commissioners to reveal any ex -parte communication with the applicant or any conflict that would not allow them to make an unbiased decision. Mr. Landers disclosed that has represented two clients regarding rentals in the Casa Bella neighborhood and has a sales listing there as well but that this would not prohibit him from making a fair decision regarding this request. Chairman Polackwich disclosed that he drove by the Casa Bella neighborhood since the last meeting but that it would not prevent him from deciding the matter based on the facts and evidence. Ms. Waldrop disclosed that she had two rental listings in the Casa Bella neighborhood but that PZC/Unapproved 2 February 8, 2018 F:\BCC\AII Committees\P&Z\2018—AGENDAS & MINUTES\PZC 020818.doc 215 it would not prohibit her from making a fair decision regarding this request. None of these disclosures were challenged. Mr. William Schutt, Senior Economic Development Planner, reviewed information regarding the two separate but related requests for rezoning approval and gave a PowerPoint presentation, copies of which are on file in the Board of County Commissioners (BCC) Office. He noted that this case was heard on January 25, 2018 by this Commission with a focus on notice requirements, and although it has since been reconfirmed that Staff followed the correct notice procedures as set forth in the code, the Board agreed to a continuation of the hearing at the request of nearby residents. Mr. Stan Boling, Community Development Director, continued the PowerPoint presentation and reviewed criteria from Policy 1..43 Future Land Use Element as well as the history of zoning in the area surrounding the proposed rezoning request. He discussed a joint meeting between the Applicant and representatives of the Casa Bella Homeowners Association that took place on February 6, 2018 resulting in an agreement for a proposed "alternative zoning map" that would remove the eastern eight acres from rezoning. He also detailed Staffs initiation of rezoning the +/ 0.20 acres owned by the Colley family that it is surrounded by the Schwerin and Others property. He recommended that the Commissioners recommend that the BCC approve the "alternative rezoning request" of +/- 10.14 acres from MED to CG. Mr. Boling proceeded to answer questions from the Commissioners regarding dimensions of the proposed "alternative zoning map" and how the depth compares to nearby commercial properties along US Highway 1. Mr. Bruce Barkett, Representative for the Applicant, and Mr. Kasey Feltner, attorney representing the Casa Bella Homeowner's Association, disclosed their proposed agreement to not rezone the eastern eight acres of the subject property and to place private restrictions on the remaining +/- 10.14 acres that would be rezoned to CG. Mr. Landers voiced his concerns regarding owners of the neighboring MED zoned properties later requesting rezoning for portions of their properties. Mr. Boling responded by citing criteria from Policy 1.43 Future Land Use Element which would be a basis for denying such requests. Chairman Polackwich inquired as to what will likely become of the eastern eight acres of the property that would remain MED zoned as well as nearby MED zoned properties. Mr. Boling advised that the County wants to be sure that there is enough MED zoned area near the hospital available for health-related industry PZC/Unapproved 3 February 8, 2018 F:\BCCWII Committees\P&Z\2018—AGENDAS & MINUTES\PZC 020818.doc 216 to expand. Dr. Richard Moore, cardiologist at Indian River Medical Center, spoke of future plans to expand medical facilities at the remaining MED zoned properties. ON MOTION BY Mr. Landers, SECONDED BY Mr. Stewart, the members voted unanimously (5-0) to approve staff recommendations on this Quasi - Judicial matter to rezone the western 10.14 acres, to include the Colley piece, from MED to CG and deny the rezoning of the eastern eight acres from MED to CG. Chairman Polackwich read the following into the record: B. Kane Request to rezone +/- 2.009 acres from RS -1 to RS -3 and +/- 4.827 acres from RS -1 to CON -2 (RZON-201708084-80032). [Quasi - Judicial] Chairman Polackwich asked the Commissioners to reveal any ex -parte communication with the applicant or any conflict that would not allow them to make an unbiased decision. The members stated that they had not had any ex - parte communication. Mr. William Schutt, Senior Economic Development Planner, reviewed information regarding this rezoning request and gave a PowerPoint presentation, copies of which are on file in the Board of County Commissioners (BCC) Office. He entered a letter into evidence from a nearby property owner that spoke in agreement of the rezoning request. He recommended that the Commissioners recommend that the BCC approve the rezoning request from RS -1 to RS -3 and CON -2. The secretary belatedly administered the testimonial oath to those present who wished to speak at tonight's meeting on this matter and Mr. Schutt reaffirmed his presentation. Representative for the Applicant, Mr. Scott McGuire of the civil engineering firm Knight McGuire & Associates Incorporated, testified that this request will simply bring the Subject Property into conformance with similar properties on the south barrier island. Mr. Kevin Ellis, property manager of the adjacent Subject Property, conveyed his concerns regarding this request concluding that he is not in favor of it moving forward. PZC/Unapproved 4 February 8, 2018 F:\BCCWII Committees\P&Z\2018—AGENDAS & MINUTES\PZC 020818.doe 217 Chairman Polackwich read the following into the record: C. An ordinance of Indian River County, Florida, amending the text of the sanitary sewer sub -element, future land use element, and coastal management element of the County's Comprehensive Plan and providing codification, severability, and effective date. [Legislative] Part 1: Sanitary sewer sub -element amendments and related amendments to the Future Land Use Element. Mr. William Schutt, Senior Economic Development Planner, detailed proposed edits relating to sanitary sewer in the Future Land Use Element and gave a PowerPoint presentation, copies of which are on file in the Board of County Commissioners (BCC) Office. He recommended that the Commissioners recommend that the BCC approve the proposed Future Land Use Element Comprehensive Plan text amendments for transmittal to state and regional review agencies. Ms. Judy Orcott, Chairperson of the Lagoon Committee for Indian River Neighborhood Association, reported that the County's fertilizer ordinance has been proven to reduce the amount of nitrogen levels in the lagoon. She addressed the approximate 35,000 septic systems in the County and the time and financial obstacles involved in either improving these current systems and treatment methods or ideally connecting to County sewer. She explained that the septic systems installed prior to 1983 have only a six-inch separation between the ground water and the drainfield whereas those installed after 1982 require twenty-four inches, adding that approximately half of the County's septic systems have only the six-inch separation. She recommended that as older systems are issued repair permits, they be required to raise the drainfield to the current code of twenty-four inches. She inquired about possible mandatory connections as sewer infrastructures are created and stated her hope for higher annual goals for Attachment 3 PZC/Unapproved 5 February 8, 2018 F:\BCC\All Committees\P&Z\2018—AGENDAS & MINUTES\PZC 020818.doc 218 the County to convert septic systems to sewer connections. She concluded by discussing the biosolids that are allowed to be spread on Indian River County farmland and ultimately end up in our water systems. Ms. Cheryl Dunn, Environmental Health Manager, discussed permits for repairs, modifications and new septic systems that her office is responsible for administering. She explained that her department can "encourage" homeowners to meet the twenty -four -inch separation between the drainfield and groundwater but that it is voluntary and unenforceable at this time for septic systems installed before 1983. She indicated that as the septic contractors typically pull repair permits, there is little to no communication between the homeowner and her department until final inspections are performed. She described the significant cost to individual homeowners to raise the drainfields, adding that for some smaller properties it could be challenging because there may not be enough lawn space available. She advised that while there are currently no funds or incentives offered for homeowners to upgrade their drainfield or treatment systems, her wish is that they will become available at least for areas that while sewer connection is not a reality, sewage may be impacting the lagoon. Mr. Vincent Burke, Utility Services Director, outlined mandates for new subdivisions and commercial development to connect to county sewer as well as determinations of mandatory connection for failed septic systems. He compared the costs to repair or upgrade existing septic systems to that of connecting to County sewer or the ultimate cost to the environment if neither option is chosen. He stated that the creation of new sewer infrastructure includes not only the price of sewer lines and pump systems, but the destruction of roadways, making these projects a public works issue as well. He concluded that his department continues to apply for grants from the State, District and the National Estuary Program (NEP) and that additional funding could shorten the timelines needed to connect communities to the County sewer system. Extensive discussion followed regarding County staffs commitment to pursue and identify opportunities to address goals, objectives and policies relating to sanitary sewer connections and septic systems. ON MOTION BY Mr. Stewart, SECONDED BY Ms. Waldrop, the members voted unanimously (5-0) to approve staff recommendations on this Legislative matter with language added regarding the County's commitment to pursue and identify opportunities. Part 2: Coastal management element amendments and related amendments to the Future Land Use Element. Attachment 3 PZC/Unapproved 6 February 8, 2018 F:\BCCWII Committees\P&Z\2018—AGENDAS & MINUTES\PZC 020818.doc 219 Mr. Steven Hitt, Senior Environmental Planner, detailed proposed edits relating to coastal management in the Future Land Use Element and gave a PowerPoint presentation, copies of which are on file in the Board of County Commissioners (BCC) Office. He recommended that the Commissioners recommend that the BCC approve the proposed amendments to the Coastal Management Element and Future Land Use Element for transmittal to state and regional review agencies. Discussion followed regarding sea level rise projections as they relate to coastal high hazard area policies and safety plans. ON MOTION BY Mr. Brognano, SECONDED BY Ms. Waldrop, the members voted unanimously (5-0) to approve staff recommendations on this Legislative matter. PZC/Unapproved , Attachment 3 F:\BCCWII Committees\P&Z\2018—AGENDAS & MINUTES\PZC 0208 io.uuu 220 ON MOTION BY Mr. Landers, SECONDED BY Mr. Brognano, the members voted unanimously (5-0) to approve staff recommendations with added sign notifications for the eight uses proposed to go from PZC approval to staff level approval. Commissioner's Matters There were none. Planning Matters Mr. Stan Boling stated the likelihood of a meeting on February 22, 2018. Attorney's Matters There were none. Adjournment There being no further business, the meeting adjourned at 9:56 p.m. PZC/Unapproved 8 February 8, 2018 F:\BCC\All Committees\P&Z\2018—AGENDAS & MINUTES\PZC 020818.doc 221 Indian River County 2030 Comprehensive Plan AL . A . Indian River County Community Development Department Adopted: October 12, 2010 Supplement # ; Adopted , 2018, Ordinance 2018- Attachrnt 4 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION.......................................................................................................................... 1 PURPOSE................................................................................................................................... 1 DEFINITIONS................................................................................................................................ 2 BACKGROUND............................................................................................................................ 4 HISTORY................................................................................................................................... 4 COUNTY UTILITIES DEPARTMENT.................................................................................... 4 CENTRALIZED REGIONAL SYSTEM................................................................................... 5 EXISTINGCONDITIONS............................................................................................................. 8 SANITARYSEWER PROCESS............................................................................................... 8 Collection................................................................................................................................ 8 Treatment................................................................................................................................ 8 By -Product Disposal............................................................................................................... 9 PUBLICSEWER SYSTEM....................................................................................................... 9 South Regional Sewer Service Area..................................................................................... 10 WestSewer Service Area...................................................................................................... 11 Central Sewer Service Area.................................................................................................. 12 North Sewer Service Area.................................................................................................... 13 City of Vero Beach Sewer Service Area............................................................................... 14 Finance.................................................................................................................................. 16 PRIVATE SEWER SYSTEMS................................................................................................ 18 SEPTICSYSTEMS................................................................................................................... 19 Septic to Sewer Study: Evaluation and Ranking...................................................................... 21 REGULATORY FRAMEWORK................................................................................................ 24 FEDERAL................................................................................................................................. 24 STATE...................................................................................................................................... 24 LOCAL..................................................................................................................................... 25 ANALYSIS................................................................................................................................... 26 COLLECTIONSYSTEM......................................................................................................... 26 ServiceArea.......................................................................................................................... 26 System Evaluation and Maintenance.................................................................................... 27 Service to New Development............................................................................................... 27 SepticSystems...................................................................................................................... 28 TREATMENT.......................................................................................................................... 32 PublicTreatment Plants........................................................................................................ 33 PrivateTreatment Plants....................................................................................................... 37 EFFLUENTDISPOSAL.......................................................................................................... 37 SUMMARYOF ANALYSIS................................................................................................... 38 GOAL, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES...................................................................................... 39 GOAL....................................................................................................................................... 39 Community Development Department Indian River County i Attachrnt 4 OBJECTIVE 1 Service Concurrent with Development..... ................................. 39 OBJECTIVE 2 Regional System Expansion/Correction of Deficiencies OBJECTIVE 3 Surface Water and Groundwater Quality ........................ OBJECTIVE 4 Water Conservation........................................................ OBJECTIVE 5 Capital Improvements..................................................... OBJECTIVE 6 Package Treatment Plants ............................................... OBJECTIVE 7 Septic Systems................................................................ PLAN IMPLEMENTATION ................... 40 ................... 40 ................... 41 ................... 41 ................... 44 ................... 45 ....................................................................................................... 48 EVALUATION AND MONITORING PROCEDURES............................................................. 52 Community Development Department Indian River County ii Attache nt 4 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 3.A.1 Indian River County WWTF Service Areas Figure 3.A.2 WWTF Capacity vs. Demand.................................................................................. 35 Community Development Department Indian River County iii AttachMnt 4 LIST OF TABLES TABLE 3.A.1 - SANITARY SEWER FACILITIES IN INDIAN RIVER COUNTY* ............... 7 TABLE 3.A.2 - COUNTY REGIONAL WASTEWATER TREATMENT SYSTEMS ............ 15 TABLE 3.A.3 - INDIAN RIVER COUNTY SUBDIVISIONS WITH INCREASED HEALTH RISKS AND/OR INCREASED PROBABILITY OF GROUNDWATER CONTAMINATION ASSOCIATED WITH CONTINUED SEPTIC TANK SYSTEM USE ...................................... 21 TABLE 3.A.3.1 - INDIAN RIVER COUNTY LIST OF SUBDIVISIONS FOR SEPTIC TO SEWER CONVERSION WITHIN UNINCORPORATED COUNTY AND CITY OF SEBASTIAN................................................................................................................................. 23 TABLE 3.A.4 - REGULATION OF SEWAGE w TABLE 3.A.5 - TYPICAL CONCENTRATIONS FOR HOUSEHOLD WASTEWATER, SEPTIC TANK EFFLUENT AND WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT EFFLUENT ..... 29 TABLE 3.A.6 - SANITARY SEWER SUB -ELEMENT IMPLEMENTATION MATRIX....... 49 TABLE 3.A.7 - SANITARY SEWER SUB -ELEMENT EVALUATION MATRIX ................ 53 TABLE 3.A.8 - WATER & WASTEWATER CONNECTION MATRIX FOR NEW DEVELOPMENT......................................................................................................................... 54 Community Development Department Indian River County iv Attachr#6nt 4 INTRODUCTION Wastewater is a term used to describe water leaving a site as sewage. Generally, this includes water from the kitchen and bathroom sinks, toilets, dishwashers, clothes washers, and bath tubs/showers. Each day, every person within Indian River County produces an average of 100 gallons of wastewater. This wastewater has three possible destinations. First, it may enter an on-site sewage treatment and disposal system (OSTDS), usually a septic tank followed by a drainfield, where it receives a minimum level of treatment. Second, it may go to a private sewage treatment plant, generally located near the dwelling unit or other structure. Private treatment plants usually provide a greater degree of treatment than septic systems. The third possible destination for wastewater is a regional treatment plant. Such regional plants may be located many miles from the structure where wastewater is generated. These plants generally provide a consistently greater degree of treatment than either septic systems or private plants. Wastewater treatment systems are comprised of three components; these are collection, treatment, and disposal. The importance of each of these three components varies with the type of wastewater system. This document will address the collection, treatment, and disposal characteristics of septic systems, private treatment plants, and regional treatment systems. PURPOSE The purpose of the Sanitary Sewer Sub -Element is to: • identify existing and projected demand and need (demand - supply = need) for sanitary sewer facilities based on the county's population, existing and future land use, capacity of existing facilities and any future changes to these facilities; • identify the operational responsibilities, geographic service areas and levels of service provided by each facility; • identify those areas where public sewer will and will not be provided; and • identify environmentally sound methods of disposing of treated wastes and sludge from treatment plants. This sub -element will provide direction for the county in planning for the collection, treatment, and disposal of wastewater in a manner consistent with federal, state and local laws. In addition, the Sanitary Sewer Sub -Element will identify proposed locations and levels of service of sanitary sewer facilities. Finally, this element will establish sanitary sewer policies that complement the county's future land use pattern and serve as a means of directing future growth in the county. Community Development Department Indian River County 1 Attacffiiient 4 DEFINITIONS Wastewater means untreated sewage. Effluent means the liquid by-product of the wastewater treatment process. Wastewater Collection Network means the system of pipes which convey the untreated wastewater from individual homes and other establishments to the treatment plant. Wastewater Interceptors are defined as parts of the collection system which connect directly to and convey sewage to the treatment plant. Wastewater Trunk Mains are components of the collection system which connect directly to and convey sewage to the interceptors through a gravity system. Pump Stations are mechanical devices used to pump sewage through the collection network (force mains) for the purpose of transporting the untreated wastewater to the treatment plant. Force Main means a pressurized segment of the collection system. Wastewater Treatment Plant means the facility which functions to remove solid and organic materials from the wastewater. Wastewater Treatment Process is the means by which solid and organic materials are removed from the untreated wastewater. Level of Wastewater Treatment is defined by the proportion of solid and organic materials removed from the wastewater. The most common levels of treatment are: primary, secondary, and tertiary. Primary Treatment removes between 30 and 35 percent of the organic material and up to 50 percent of the solids from the sewage. Because screens and settling tanks are the most common methods used to remove the solids, this process is also referred to as physical treatment. Secondary Treatment removes between 80 and 90 percent of the total organic material and suspended solids from the sewage. This level of treatment generally requires multiple steps involving one biological process and one or more physical processes for removal of suspended solids. Tertiary Treatment is a level of wastewater treatment which removes the organic material and suspended solids, synthetic organic compounds and inorganic chemicals. If not removed, these agents may cause pollution problems. Tertiary treatment adds steps to the primary and secondary processes which will remove these pollutants. The most common tertiary processes Community Development Department Indian River County 2 AttacMient 4 remove compounds of phosphorus and nitrogen. The effluent from advanced treatment processes often approaches the quality of drinking water. Septic Systems are small scale wastewater treatment systems consisting of two components. Those components are typically a septic tank where solids settle out and biological action occurs, and a drainfield where the remaining liquid is discharged and further treated. Septic systems provide a minimal level of wastewater treatment. Regional Wastewater Treatment Systems are large scale sanitary sewer systems comprised of three components: collection of raw sewage; treatment of the sewage; and the disposal of the treated sludge and effluent. Package Wastewater Treatment Plants are small treatment systems designed and built in modular units and having components similar to larger regional treatment facilities. Infiltration means water, other than wastewater, that enters a sewer system (including sewer service connections and foundation drains) from the ground through such means as defective pipes, pipe joints, connections or manholes. Inflow means water, other than wastewater, that enters a sewer system (including sewer service connections) from sources such as, but not limited to, roof leaders, cellar drains, yard drains, area drains, drains from springs and swampy areas, manhole covers, cross connections between storm sewers and sanitary sewers, catch basins, cooling towers, storm waters, surface runoff, street wash waters or drainage. Community Development Department Indian River County 3 Attacent 4 BACKGROUND An important aspect of wastewater or sanitary sewer planning involves examining existing conditions. Prior to that, however, it is helpful to consider the background or history of the wastewater system in the county. That provides a perspective regarding county policy on this matter. Instead of a static view of current conditions as the existing conditions section provides, the background section identifies recent trends in this area. HISTORY A review of recent history shows that Indian River County has owned and operated sanitary sewer facilities for only a relatively short time. Prior to the 1970's, the use of centralized facilities which provide the highest level of treatment and efficiency was limited to the densest and most intensely developed urban areas of the county. Those areas were located within or adjacent to the City of Vero Beach. While centralized sewer service has been available to the City of Vero Beach since 1926, the rest of the county did not have access to such service until the late 1970's. In the past, the use of privately owned sewer facilities provided the county with an alternative to publicly owned, centralized sewer services. Private sewer facilities are operated by private companies which are given the authority to provide wastewater service to specified areas. Most private wastewater systems provide service only to an individual subdivision or development. Prior to the establishment of the County Utilities Department in 1972, the regulation of wastewater facilities rested with several state and federal agencies and often focused on the permitting of new and the expansion of existing treatment facilities. By 1972, the regulatory agencies were becoming more intent on discouraging the use of individual septic tanks and small package systems. COUNTY UTILITIES DEPARTMENT Authorized to develop procedures and standards for utilities in the county, the County Utilities Department also issues utility permits. Initially formed to regulate privately owned utility systems, the Utilities Department was also charged with establishing a countywide utilities system. At the time that the utility department was created, centralized sewer services in the county were provided by the City of Vero Beach, by private utility companies, and by private systems serving individual buildings and developments. A majority of residential developments in the unincorporated county, however, relied on individual septic tanks for wastewater treatment and disposal. In 1973, a master sewage plan was developed for the county. That plan identified the need for publicly owned and operated regional facilities to protect the public health and prosperity of the community. The plan outlined proposed service areas in the eastern portion of the county as well Community Development Department Indian River County 4 AttacMent 4 as the necessary facilities and capitalization required to implement the plan. The plan also recommended eventually incorporating private sewer treatment facilities into the county system. Also in 1973, the County and the City of Vero Beach entered into an agreement regarding the provision of sanitary sewer services. This agreement established boundaries for areas in the county that would receive services from the city. CENTRALIZED REGIONAL SYSTEM The county's first direct provision of wastewater treatment services took place in 1978, as the result of problems at two private sewer systems. The Gifford system (later to be known as the Central Plant) and Ixora Park facilities had experienced system failures that resulted in the release of raw sewage into the surrounding areas. Because of these problems and their environmental impacts, the County Utilities Department assumed responsibility for the operation of these plants. The Central Plant has since been expanded, while the Ixora plant has been decommissioned. In 1982, county wastewater services expanded when the Utilities Department took over the operation of the Vista Royale and Vista Royale Gardens plants in the southern part of the county. This expansion continued with construction of the West Regional Wastewater Treatment Plant which began operation in 1986. Located south of SR 60 and east of I-95, the West Regional Plant provides wastewater service for the rapidly growing SR 60 Corridor area. In the early 1.990's, the County took over the operation and the maintenance of the Blue Cypress Lake Package Wastewater Treatment Facility. Utilities system expansion continued in the 1990's. In 1990, the county completed construction of the North County Plant. Then, the County acquired the South County Plant from General Development Utilities in 1993. In 1995, the county purchased the City of Sebastian's utilities system. In 1987, Indian River County adopted a Wastewater Master Plan which has been updated several times since then, most recently in December 2004. That plan identified a system of wastewater treatment facilities to accommodate the anticipated growth of the county. The Master Plan identifies five sewer service areas. Those areas are North, West, Central, South, and City of Vero Beach. One publicly owned and operated regional wastewater treatment plant exists within each of the five service areas. In addition to public facilities, septic systems and private treatment facilities currently exist and will continue to exist in the county. Table 3.A.1 lists existing wastewater treatment plants in Indian River County with their capacity and service area. Community Development Department Indian River County 5 AttacRhent 4 :,. DEPARTMENT OF UTILITY SERVICES Wast*�tel Sellol" Bwndall.. OVERALL WNTF SERVICE AREAS -2017CMN0mR&aim-,Rl 14 .�.�.•..Hyl.4 95 . aS ♦ f.♦P� ?i c, q�� 4�fof�• �♦o b WON ♦..,�.♦.fa.00°♦oa�♦f .•O�!'i❖OOi+eO�•�O••ii4v: ° ♦f..f as �:...< i°.♦i•OOolop, rl �lk.1�•��f�•iy:•ld�•� aI= � WIN COUNTY WeAV12,20171 TABLE 3.A.1 - SANITARY SEWER FACILITIES IN INDIAN RIVER COUNTY* * Excludes private permitted Industrial Waste Water facilities SOURCE: Indian River County Utilities Department Community Development Department Indian River County Attacent 4 PUBLIC PACKAGE SERVICE.AREA DESIGN CAPACITY IN OR OPERATING OR GALLONS/DAY FACILITY PRIVATE ENTITY REGIONAL 1. North public IRC regional North of 771 Street to North County 850,000 County Line & North Barrier Island 2. Central public IRC regional 261 Street and Vero Beach City limits 4,000,000 County to 69's Street 3. West public IRC regional South of 26th Street and west of City of 6,000,000 County Vero Beach 4. S. County public IRC regional Southeast mainland 2,000,000 5. Vero public Vero Beach regional Vero Beach, Ind. Riv. Shores, S. Barrier 4,500,000 Beach Island 6. Blue public IRC package Blue Cypress Improvement Dist. 17,000 Cypress 7. Sun -Ag private Sun -Ag Co. package Sun -Ag Mobile Home Park near 50,000 MHP Fellsmere 8. Sun -Ag private Sun -Ag Co. package Sun -Ag Packinghouse near Fellsmere 2,500 Packing- house 9. Su -Rene Mobile private Su -Rene package Su -Rene Mobile Home Park 5,000 Home Park 10. Royal Oak private Royal Oak package Royal Oak Mobile Home Park 5,000 Mobile Home Park * Excludes private permitted Industrial Waste Water facilities SOURCE: Indian River County Utilities Department Community Development Department Indian River County Attacent 4 EXISTING CONDITIONS In assessing existing conditions, it is necessary to address the sanitary sewer system on several levels. First, it is necessary to differentiate among the various types of systems in the county. This involves separate consideration of the publicly -owned sewer systems, the privately -owned sewer systems, and individual septic systems. Second, it is necessary to identify individual service areas for both the public system and private systems. Finally, it is necessary to assess each type of system and service area in terms of collection, treatment, and disposal. SANITARY SEWER PROCESS Within the county, there are various sanitary sewer systems and service areas. Although specific aspects of the sanitary sewer process vary with the type of system, certain characteristics are the same, regardless of system type. Collection Once wastewater is generated by residences, businesses, industries, and other land uses, it is then conveyed from an individual establishment to a wastewater treatment plant by the collection network. Alternatively, the wastewater may go to an individual septic tank for on-site treatment. Where a centralized system is involved, however, the collection network is generally laid out in a pattern roughly comparable to the branching pattern of a tree. Whereas the smallest sewer pipes connect individual establishments to components of the collection system called trunk mains and interceptors, interceptors and trunk mains connect with and convey wastewater directly to the treatment plant. Treatment After being collected, wastewater is processed by a wastewater treatment plant. Presently, both Indian River County and the City of Vero Beach maintain regional wastewater treatment plants. In addition to those five regional facilities, there are four private package wastewater treatment facilities and the one public package treatment facility (the Blue Cypress Lake wastewater treatment plant) in the county. The existing wastewater treatment plants use a variety of methods to treat wastewater. Once at the treatment plant, the wastewater is treated to remove solid and organic materials. The level of processing of the wastewater is either primary, secondary, advanced secondary, or tertiary. Overall, the treatment level is based on the treatment method and the proportion of materials removed from the wastewater. Community Development Department Indian River County 8 Attacent 4 In addition to differences in the methods of treating wastewater, the existing wastewater treatment plants also differ in the capacity of the facilities. Expressed in terms of gallons of wastewater per day, the capacity of a wastewater treatment plant is the number of gallons of wastewater that the plant can treat and dispose of on an average daily basis. BY -Product Disposal The by-products of the treatment process are effluent, screenings and grit, as well as sludge and septage. Effluent is liquid waste. At county operated wastewater treatment facilities, effluent is usually disposed of through either discharge to a percolation pond, through wetlands, or by reuse. Reuse is an effluent disposal method involving spray irrigation. Screenings and grit are the accumulated coarse sewage solids retained by the screening process. Screenings and grit are disposed of at the county landfill. Sludge and septage are the biological organisms that accumulate in the plant. Prior to final disposal, sludge is usually subjected to an additional biological treatment process to remove pathogens. Sludge is then transported to the County's Residual Dewatering Facility (RDF), where along with grease they are subject to a physical dewatering process which facilitates disposal. A screw conveyor is used to transfer the dried cake to a truck for hauling to the landfill for ultimate disposal. PUBLIC SEWER SYSTEM The five geographic areas comprising the county public sewer system are: the south regional area, the west regional area, the central regional area, the north regional area, and the City of Vero Beach service area. Within the county system, the south county regional plant is connected to the west county regional plant; the north county regional plant is connected to the central county regional plant; and there is a limited connection between the central regional plant and west regional plant. Because the county's regional wastewater treatment plants are interconnected, there is flexibility as to which plant or plants will need to be expanded to accommodate future demand. At the county's central plant, the county also treats the City of Fellsmere's sewage for a bulk rate. Currently, the city's average daily sewer flow is about 71,000 gallons per day, with a maximum flow of 100,000 gallons per day. Besides its regional plants, Indian River County also operates the Blue Cypress Lake package treatment facility. In 2017, 28,167 (47.24%) of the 59,618 developed residential and commercial parcels within the County's service area were connected to the County's regional sewer system. Community Development Department Indian River County 9 AttacMi� ent 4 South Regional Sewer Service Area The South Regional Sewer Service Area is located in the southeast portion of the mainland and contains the South Regional Wastewater Treatment Facility (SRWWTF). The SRWWTF is a 2,000,000 GPD facility which uses biological nutrient removal to provide a tertiary filtration level of treatment. Effluent from the SRWWTF is reused for spray irrigation or discharged into percolation ponds or discharged into the 169 acre man-made wetland on the West Regional WWTF site. In addition to force mains along US 1, the South Regional Service Area collection system currently extends to the Vero Shores, Garden Grove, and Grove Isle developments, portions of the Vero Beach Highlands residential subdivision, and other subdivisions within the southern portion of the county. South Regional Plant Public or Private Public Operating Entity Indian River County Geographic service area South County Area Design capacity in GPD 2,000,000 Current demand in GPD (2017) 813,000 Level of Service 250 GPD/ERU Projected facility needs 1,850,000 gal./day 2030 Effluent Disposal Method Reuse Effluent Disposal Site Various Level of Treatment Tertiary Filtration Treatment Method Biological Nutrient Removal Screenings/Grit Disposal Site Landfill Sludge and Septage Disposal Site Sludge Facility at Landfill Community Development Department 10 Indian River County Atta4vent 4 West Sewer Service Area The West Regional Service Area includes the unincorporated SR 60 corridor area and the area southwest of Vero Beach. Within the West Regional Service Area, there is one wastewater treatment plant. The West Regional Wastewater Treatment Facility (WWTF) is located south of 8th Street, north of 4th Street, and between 90th Avenue and 82nd Avenue. This plant, with a 6,000,000 GPD capacity, uses biological nutrient removal to provide a tertiary filtration level of treatment. Presently, effluent from this treatment facility is reused for spray irrigation or discharged into a f 169 acre man-made wetland on the treatment plant site. The West Regional Service Area force mains extend from the West Regional WWTF along the SR 60 corridor and along 66th Avenue from SR 60 to 4th Street. Force mains also extend from the West County Plant along 82nd Avenue to the Oslo Road/74th Avenue commercial/industrial node and to the SR 60/I-95 commercial/industrial node. The system serves the Heritage Village, Countryside, Cambridge Park, Indian River Estates, Village Green, Vista Plantation, Lake in the Woods, Sixty Oaks, and Rivera Estates residential developments. West Regional Plant Public or Private Public Operating Entity Indian River County Geographic service area SR 60 Corridor west of 58th Avenue Design capacity in GPD 6,000,000 Current demand in GPD (2017) 2,214,000 Level of Service 250 GPD/ERU Projected facility needs 4,850,000 gal./day (2030) Effluent Disposal Method Reuse Irrigation/Wetlands Treatment Effluent Disposal Site Golf Courses & West Reg. Wetlands Level of Treatment Tertiary Filtration Treatment Method Biological Nutrient Removal Screenings/Grit Disposal Site Landfill Sludge and Se tage Disposal Site Sludge Facility at Landfill Community Development Department Indian River County 11 Attacent 4 Central Sewer Service Area The Central Regional Sewer Service Area includes the portion of the mainland generally bounded by I-95 on the west, 69t' Street on the north, the Indian River Lagoon on the east, and the City of Vero Beach and 260h Street on the south. This plant located north of 49th Street, in the unincorporated community of Gifford. The Central Regional Wastewater Treatment Facility (WWTF) is located within the service area. This plant, with a 4,000,000 GPD capacity, uses contact stabilization and extended aeration to provide a tertiary filtration level of treatment. Presently, effluent from the treatment facility is discharged into percolation ponds or reused for spray irrigation. Collection lines extend from the plant along 49th Street, between 58rd Avenue and US 1, along 58th Avenue from 26th Street to 65th Street, along 53rd Street from 58th Avenue to the Lateral H canal and along US 1 from 69th street to Indian River Memorial Hospital. The system also extends to the Bent Pine and Grand Harbor residential developments, and to much of the Gifford community. The Central Regional WWTF is presently accepting flow from the North Regional Wastewater Treatment Facility, which is temporarily on stand-by. The flow is being transferred from the north facility to the central facility via a 16" transmission force main located along Old Dixie Highway from 770' Street to 53rd Street, then into the Central Regional WWTF along the Lateral H canal. Central Re ional Plant Public or Private Public Operating Entity Indian River County Geographic service area Vero Beach City Limits to 69th St. Design capacity in GPD 4,000,000 Current demand in GPD (2017) 2,253,000 Level of Service 250 GPD/ERU Projected facility needs 4,250,000 gal./day (2030) Effluent Disposal Method Reuse Irrigation/Rib Basin Effluent Disposal Site Various Golf Courses Level of Treatment Tertiary Treatment Treatment Method Contact Stabilization/Extended Aeration Screenings/Grit Disposal Site Landfill Sludge and Septage Disposal Site Sludge Facility at landfill Community Development Department Indian River County 12 Attacent 4 North Sewer Service Area The North Sewer Service Area lies north of 7711 Street and encompasses the area between I-95 and the Atlantic Ocean. Within this service area, there is one wastewater treatment plant operated by the county. This plant is the North Regional Wastewater Treatment Facility (WWTF). The North County Plant is an 850,000 GPD facility which uses an oxidation ditch and extended aeration to provide a tertiary filtration level of treatment. Effluent from the North County Plant is discharged into percolation ponds or reused for spray irrigation. North Regional Plant Public or Private Public Operating Entity Indian River County Geographic service area 77h Street to North County Line Design capacity in GPD 850,000 Current demand in GPD (2017) Flow transferred to Central Regional Plant Level of Service 250 GPD/ERU Projected facility needs 2,000,000 gal./day 2030) Effluent Disposal Method Percolation Pond/Spray Irrigation Effluent Disposal Site Golf Courses Level of Treatment Tertiary Filtration Treatment Method Oxidation Ditch/Extended Aeration Screenings/Grit Disposal Site Landfill Sludge and Se tage Disposal Site I Sludge Facility at landfill Collection lines extend south from the North County Plant along Old Dixie Highway to 73rd Street. From there, the lines extend east into the Copeland's Landing residential development. To the north, lines extend along the US 1 corridor to the county line. A force main runs along CR 512, from US 1 to I-95, and north along Roseland Road from CR 512 to approximately '/ mile north of Main Street. Another force main extends west along Main Street from US 1 to approximately halfway to Roseland Road. Collection lines, including a force main along the north two miles of Roseland Road, extend to the Roseland area. Collection lines also extend to several residential developments on the north barrier island, including Sea Oaks, Windsor, and the Town of Orchid. Presently, the North Regional WWTF is temporarily shut down, and the flow is being transferred to the Central Regional WWTF via a 16' force main along Old Dixie Highway from 771i Street to 53rd Street and then along the Lateral H canal into the Central Regional WWTF. Community Development Department Indian River County 13 Attacent 4 City of Vero Beach Sewer Service Area The City of Vero Beach sewer service territory encompasses the City of Vero Beach, most of the Town of Indian River Shores (one multiple -family residential complex is excluded), and the portion of the barrier island south of the City of Vero Beach. In addition, it serves some of the unincorporated county area around the city. The Vero Beach Wastewater Treatment Plant has a design capacity of 4,500,000 GPD. The method of treatment consists of complete mix activated sludge, followed by water reclamation processes that include tertiary filtration and high level disinfection. Most effluent from this plant is used for irrigation by golf courses and residential developments. The remainder is disposed of via deep injection well. City of Vero Beach Plant Public or Private Public Operating Entity City of Vero Beach Geographic service area City of Vero Beach; Town of Indian River Shores; South Barrier Island Design capacity in GPD 4,500,000 Current demand in GPD (2017) 3,500,000 Level of Service 250 GPD/ERU Projected facility needs 4,000,000 gal./day (2030) Effluent Disposal Method Reuse/Deep Injection Well Effluent Disposal Site Residential Landscapes/Golf Courses Level of Treatment Secondary/High Level Disinfection Treatment Method Activated Sludge/Filtration Screenings/Grit Disposal Site Landfill Sludge and Se tage Disposal Site Landfill Table 3.A.2 summarizes the county regional wastewater treatment system. Community Development Department 14 Indian River County Attacent 4 Comprehensive Plan Sanitary Sewer Sub -Element TABLE 3.A.2 - COUNTY REGIONAL WASTEWATER TREATMENT SYSTEMS SERVICE TREATMENT DESIGN 2017 TYPES OF TREATMENT METHOD TREATMENT EFFLUENT PROPORTIONAL AREA PLANT CAPACITY DEMAND LAND USES LEVEL DISPOSAL METHOD ALLOCATION IN GPD IN GPD SERVED NORTH North County 850,000 Flow residential, oxidation ditch and extended tertiary percolation pond and 60% Sebastian, 30% transferred to commercial, aeration spray irrigation IRC, Central Plant industrial 0% Fellsmere CENTRAL Central County 4,000,000 2,253,000 residential, contact stabilization and tertiary percolation pond and 100% IRC includes flow commercial, extended aeration spray irrigation from north industrial regional WEST West County 6,000,000 2,214,000 residential, biological nutrient removal tertiary spray irrigation and on- 100% IRC commercial, site wetland industrial SOUTH South County 2,000,000 813,000 residential, Biological nutrient removal tertiary spray irrigation, 100% IRC commercial, percolation pond and industrial West Regional Wetland VERO City of Vero 4,500,000 3,500,000 residential, complete mix activated tertiary spray irrigation 65% Vero Bch., 24% BEACH Beach commercial, sludge and high level IRC, industrial disinfection 11% Indian River Shores TOTAL 17,350,000 1 8,780,000 Community Development Department Indian River County 15 241 Comprehensive Plan Finance Sanitary Sewer Sub -Element Financially, the Indian River County Utilities Department is an enterprise system. That means that there is no general tax money allocated for the construction or expansion of utility services. Instead, the County Utilities Department's revenue comes from sources such as water sales, meter installation charges, hydrant maintenance tax, sewer service charges, effluent reuse sales, penalties, service charges, capacity charges, and other sources which make the utility department financially self-sufficient. According to county regulations, most parcels within 200 feet of a county sewer line must connect to the county system. Upon connection, a customer incurs certain charges. Those charges generally cover the costs of capacity producing facility capital improvements. Some charges, however, can be incurred even before connection. Because unused capacity can be reserved for future development, wastewater treatment plants are developed with excess capacity. Since maintaining that excess capacity increases operation and maintenance costs, a monthly base facility charge applies to capacity reserved for future development. Other charges include the following: • waste water treatment charges • volume charges • customer charges • connection charges • meter re -reads and leak inspection charges • delinquency charges • general service call charges • meter calibration charges • damage repair charges • engineering services charges • deposits required upon opening • charges for transferring or reconnecting a service • additional charges for complex connections Some charges, such as connection fees, vary based on meter size or type of commercial use. The Utilities Department may use these revenues to expand facilities or to modify the existing system. These funds can be used for either capital or operating needs. Another source of revenue, which can be used only to offset a portion of the capital cost of expanding system capacity, is the capacity charge. Capacity charges pay for certain necessary improvements that must be made in order to provide added capacity to meet the needs of new Community Development Department Indian River County 16 Attac4went 4 Comprehensive Plan Sanitary Sewer Sub -Element residents as well as industrial and business establishments anticipated in future years. The remaining capital cost is recouped through monthly charges. As a payment option for extension of the sewer collection system, the county allows a contribution in aid of construction. After the installation of sewage collection facilities by a developer, title to those facilities is transferred to the county. The referenced facilities may be "on-site" or "off-site." These options are discussed below. • On -Site Facilities Each developer is responsible for the design, installation, inspection, and testing of the complete sewage collection system located within the boundaries of the developer's property. • Off-site Facilities The location, size or proposed density or intensity of a development project may make service to the property dependent upon the extension of off-site sewage collection facilities. Off-site facilities are those mains, sewage collection lines, sewage force mains, and/or pumping stations adequate in size to transmit sewage collected on the developer's property to a treatment plant or disposal site. The county's policy is to expand its sewer system in an orderly and economical manner. That expansion schedule, however, does not always coincide with a developer's plans. In cases where the county does not plan to expand its system to serve a project in the timeframe required by a developer, the developer is required to construct or pay the cost of off-site facilities associated with that project when the following conditions exist: such an extension would require an extraordinary expenditure by the county for transmission facilities; and such expenditure would cost more than the county's standard capacity charge. In that event, the county may negotiate an agreement which enumerates the following: the county's responsibility to provide service to the development and possibly reimburse the developer for oversized facilities; and the developer's responsibility to construct and dedicate to the county the off-site facilities (possibly oversized to meet future demands). Community Development Department Indian River County 17 Attae4ent 4 Comprehensive Plan Refundable Advances Sanitary Sewer Sub -Element In addition to a contribution in aid of construction of off-site facilities, the county may require a refundable advance by a developer to further temporarily defray the cost of any "off-site" extension of water and/or sewer mains and pumping stations necessary to connect the developer's property to the county's water and sewer facilities. This provision recognizes instances in which a developer may be required to advance funds to construct off-site facilities sized in accordance with the County's Master Plan. All amounts expended by a developer pursuant to such an agreement, over and above the developer's need for off-site facilities, may be refunded to the developer in accordance with the terms and conditions of a refunding agreement which the county executes with the developer. When the county deems it to be in the best interest of the county utility system, the County may assume a portion of the material cost of such projects. Generally, refund agreements provide for a plan of refund based upon the connection of other properties served by the "off-site" facilities installed by the developer. Assessment Another funding option available to the county is assessment. With this method, the Board of County Commissioners may assess benefitting property owners a proportional share of the cost of any county project, including utility line extensions. Assessment projects may be initiated by either the Board or property owners. For utility line extensions, main transmission or collection lines (Master Plan lines) are not included in the assessment calculations. Those lines are funded through other sources. Generally, assessments may be financed for up to 10 years, with assessment interest rates set by the Board of County Commissioners in January of each year. Usually, the Board adopts the prime rate. PRIVATE SEWER SYSTEMS Indian River County has four active private sewer systems, each of which uses package treatment plants. Two- of the county's private plants are operated by the Sun -Ag company. Those plants are located near the City of Fellsmere, outside of the county's service area. One of those plants serves a mobile home park, while the other serves a packinghouse. Both of those facilities use extended aeration to provide a secondary level of treatment. Effluent at those plants is disposed of through a percolation pond. The county's other private systems are located at the Su -Rene mobile home park and Royal Oak mobile home park in the unincorporated county. Those facilities use extended aeration to provide a secondary level of treatment. Effluent at those plants is disposed of through a percolation pond. Community Development Department Indian River County 18 AttacAMent 4 Comprehensive Plan SEPTIC SYSTEMS Sanitary Sewer Sub -Element The third type of sanitary sewer system is an onsite sewage and treatment and disposal system (OSTDS) which may be utilized under certain conditions when a private or publicly owned centralized sewer system is unavailable. Septic systems are designed to serve one or a limited number of facilities and are sized based on estimated water use. Despite major expansion of the wastewater collection network, many developed commercial and residential parcels within the unincorporated portion of the county do not have access to regional wastewater treatment facilities or package treatment plants. For those land uses, wastewater treatment and disposal is provided by septic systems. Based on the Florida Department of Health Waste Water Inventory for 2015, an estimated 45% of the developed commercial and residential parcels in Indian River County are served by public sanitary sewer and an estimated 55% of the remaining developed commercial and residential parcels are served by septic systems. From 2007 through 2016, there were an average of 121 new septic systems constructed annually with steadily increasing numbers from 2013 to 2016. Even so, the average number of new septic systems per year (121) is significantly lower than the 658 new systems per year average for the 1995 — 2006 period. The average number of septic systems repairs per year for the 2007-2016 period was 591. There are commercial and industrial corridors that are served by septic systems such as portions of US Hwy 1, Old Dixie Hwy and Oslo Road. Most of the residential septic systems are concentrated in Roseland, Sebastian, Vero Lake Estates, and south of State Road 60. A septic system consists of two components. One is the septic tank, while the other is the drainfield. The tank receives sewage from the residence or commercial establishment and provides a period of settling, during which time a significant portion of the solids settle out. The treatment process is accomplished by bacteria that gradually decompose the solids which settle to the bottom of the septic tank. The remaining liquid or effluent is discharged through underground drainage pipes into the drainfield where it percolates into the soil. Once in the soil, microorganisms and filtration treat the liquids. As part of routine maintenance, the accumulated solids should be removed from the septic tank every 3 to 5 years by a licensed contractor. The solids, called septage, are generally transported to the residual dewatering facility next to the county landfill. Septic systems provide minimal onsite wastewater treatment for residential and commercial developments. Typically, a 3 -bedroom residential septic system has a 900- gallon septic tank and 375 square feet of trench drainfield. Commercial septic systems vary depending on estimated water use. Since effluent from septic tanks is discharged to a drainfield where it percolates into the soil, soil permeability and depth to the water table are limiting factors for septic system use. To ensure adequate performance and protection of groundwater quality, elevation of septic system drainfields is often required. All OSTDS (septic system) permitting is done by the Florida Department of Health in Indian River County (DOH -Indian River). According to the DOH -Indian River it is challenging to permit septic system installations in the county due to several factors including: Community Development Department Indian River County 19 Attadn%5 ent 4 Comprehensive Plan Sanitary Sewer Sub -Element • a wet season water table of less than 10inches as described in the USDA Soil Survey; the presence of restrictive low permeable soil strata; • platted or recorded parcels less than 11/2 acre; and • setbacks from surface waters and/or wells. The areas of the county having "Excessively Drained Soils" and "Moderately Drained Soils" are better suited for septic systems. As shown on Figure 3.E.1 of the Stormwater Management Sub - Element, even these two soil types have limitations with respect to septic system suitability. While moderately drained soils have a severe limitation rating for septic system suitability, excessively drained soils percolate so rapidly that they provide very poor filtration. Septic systems on these soils have a potential for causing groundwater contamination. Areas of excessively drained soils in Indian River County are typically adjacent to waterbodies including canals, St. Sebastian River, and the Indian River Lagoon. The Florida Department of Health (DOH) establishes the rules for septic system permitting.. During the wet season, June through October, the water table in much of the county is less than 10 inches below the existing natural grade. Therefore, fill material is often placed on top of existing soil creating a mound to achieve the required 24 inch separation between the bottom of the drainfield and the wet season water table. This fill material, which provides the depth necessary for the proper operation of the septic system, typically contains slightly limited soils that treat effluent discharged into the drainfield. The DOH has determined that the average life of a residential septic system (including drainfield) is 19 years and that of a commercial system is 10 years. Routine maintenance and proper use can extend the life of a septic system. When septic systems are repaired, the DOH allows for a drainfield replacement according to the rules in place at the time of original construction. Most repairs for parcels developed prior to 1983 are permitted with only a 6 inch separation between the bottom of the drainfield and the wet season water table rather than 24 inches. In low density areas with adequate soils where septic systems are appropriate, there can still be problems if septic systems are not maintained. Generally, septic tanks need to be pumped every 3 to 5 years. While there are private septic tank service companies which pump septic tanks and haul away septage, it is the septic tank owner who is responsible for initiating maintenance activities. Improperly maintained septic systems can cause a system failure and a sanitary nuisance often requiring a repair of the septic system. Besides soil and groundwater conditions, adverse impacts may arise due to inadequate separation between septic system drainfields and wells or waterbodies. Without adequate Community Development Department Indian River County 20 Attaciffient 4 Comprehensive Plan Sanitary Sewer Sub -Element separation, the potential of contamination from septic systems seeping into wells or waterbodies is greatly increased. The DOH requires a minimum separation of 75 feet between wells and septic systems for parcels recorded or platted after 1972. The DOHrequires new construction utilizing a well and septic system to be a minimum of %z acre (approximately 21,780 square feet). If a lot is served by a public water system, a septic system may be used even if the lot is as small as '/ acre (approximately 10,890 square feet). There are many areas of the county in which existing subdivisions contain lots which do not meet the minimum acreage requirements. Nevertheless, parcels recorded or platted prior to 1972 that are smaller than 21,780 and 10,890 square feet are grandfathered in and are being developed and repaired based on lot flow allowances utilizing septic systems. Table 3.A.3 lists subdivisions in the county urban service area that are significantly less than 10,890 square feet or constructed with older block septic tanks posing an increased health risk and/or increased probability of groundwater contamination associated with continued septic system use. TABLE 3.A.3 - INDIAN RIVER COUNTY SUBDIVISIONS WITH INCREASED HEALTH RISKS AND/OR INCREASED PROBABILITY OF GROUNDWATER CONTAMINATION ASSOCIATED WITH CONTINUED SEPTIC TANK SYSTEM USE 1. Oslo Park 2. Paradise Park 3. Stevens Park 4. Durrance Place 5. West Wabasso Source: DOH- Indian River Besides the above list of subdivisions with increased health risk and potential for localized groundwater contamination, there are subdivisions currently served by septic systems that are located close to the Indian River Lagoon, the St. Sebastian River, or to drainage canals or other streams/surface waters potentially resulting in a disproportionally higher negative impact on Indian River Lagoon water quality. In 2016, county Utilities Services funded a septic to sewer study to identify and rank those platted subdivisions served by septic systems that have a disproportionately higher negative impact on the Indian River Lagoon. The study was performed by Schulke, Bittle and Stoddard, LLC (SBS), was accepted by the Board of County Commissioners on July 10, 2017, and is available online via the county website. Septic to Sewer Study: Evaluation and Ranking The goal of the study was to identify and rank the areas of septic system use having disproportionately higher potential for negative lagoon impact based on various physical and environmental factors, and to determine the feasibility of incorporating septic to sewer Community Development Department Indian River County 21 AttaAMent 4 Comprehensive Plan Sanitary Sewer Sub -Element conversion mitigation projects into a 10 -year Capital Improvements Plan. As part of the study, a specific formula for the utility service area of Indian River County (IRC) was developed and modeled after similar studies performed for Martin County (Martin County Septic System Evaluation Final Report; CapTec Engineering, Inc.; February 13, 2015) and Brevard County (Save Our Lagoon Project Plan for Brevard County, Florida; TetraTech, Inc and CloseWaters LLC; July 28, 2016). The IRC formula was modified from the formulas used in the Martin and Brevard studies to consider and weigh physical and environmental factors that SBS and IRC staff determined would better represent Indian River County conditions. In the IRC study, the following factors were used in the initial ranking of the three hundred and twenty-five (325) platted subdivisions currently served by septic tanks with respect to potential negative impacts on the lagoon: • Population Density for Loading Concentrations • Proximity to Surface Waters • Location of the Community in Relation to the 100 -year Flood Plain — FEMA Flood Plain • Depth of the Ground Water Table • Soil Conditions of the Drain Field — Soil Type • Age of the Surface Water Management System • Age of the Existing Onsite Sewage Treatment and Disposal Systems (OSTDS) Each factor was evaluated for every one of the 325 subdivisions and assigned an index number that generally ranged from 0 to 12, with 0 being the minimum and 12 being the maximum impact. The formula used to determine the ranking was simply the sum of all factor values for that subdivision. The higher the sum (the "score"), the higher the estimated potential negative impact to the Indian River Lagoon (IRL). SBS and IRC staff agreed to weight the "Population Density" and "Proximity to Surface Waters" factors in the IRC study, because those two factors are believed to cause a higher negative impact than the other factors. In the study, the 325 subdivisions served by septic systems were ranked in order where number 1 had the highest negative lagoon impact (89.19) and number 325 had the lowest negative impact (26.97). Once the initial ranking was finalized, an Engineers Opinion of Probable Cost (OPC) was estimated for the top thirty five (35) ranked subdivisions having the highest negative impacts. Those top 35 ranked subdivisions were further evaluated based on the following factors: 1. Aquatic Health - Environmental Impact Evaluation or the Initial Ranking 2. Sewer System Evaluation and Cost Data 3. Total Nitrogen (TN)/Total Phosphorus (TP) 4. Public Health - Based on the availability of potable water The study evaluated the total nitrogen (TN) and total phosphorus (TP) that could be removed from the environment by septic to sewer conversion and calculated a cost per pound for TN removal for each of the top 35 ranked subdivisions. TP calculations were removed from the analysis since most technical references and studies show that phosphorus is adequately removed by a properly functioning septic Community Development Department Indian River County 22 AttadnAent 4 Comprehensive Plan Sanitary Sewer Sub -Element system. Septic to sewer conversion projects for the top 35 subdivisions were then ranked for the highest benefit to cost ratio, with the number 1 ranking providing the greatest benefit compared to the conversion project cost (see Table 3.A.3.1). TABLE 3.A.3.1 - INDIAN RIVER COUNTY LIST OF SUBDIVISIONS FOR SEPTIC TO SEWER CONVERSION WITHIN UNINCORPORATED COUNTY AND CITY OF SEBASTIAN Rank Subdivision Name Rank Subdivision Name Rank Subdivision Name 1 Floravon Shores Subdivision 14 Sebastian Highlands Unit 02 Replat PG 2 24 Dales Landing Subdivision Tropic Colony Subdivision 2 Sebastian Highlands Unit 02 Collier 14 Hobart Landing Unit 3 24 ^^^�s'.,r.. � 3 Sebastian Highlands Unit 05 16 River Shores Estates Units 1- 4 29 Winter Grove Subdivision 4 Hobart Landing Unit 2 17 Pine Tree Park Units 1-4 29 Kanawah Acres 5 Orchid Island No. 2 17 Indian River Heights Units 1 -9 31 Tropic Colony Subdivision 5 Sebastian Highlands Unit 04 17 Sebastian Highlands Unit 02 Replat PG 3 32 Halleluiah Acres 7 Orchid Island No. 1 20 Rain Tree Corner Subdivision 33 Little Portion Subdivision Replat OF 8 Sebastian Highlands Unit 01 21 Diana Park Subdivision 34 Sebastian Highlands Unit 02 Replat PG 4* 8 Ambersand Beach Sub No 1 & 2 22 Verona Estates Subdivision 35 Heritage Trace at Hobart* 10 Sebastian Highlands Unit 03 22 Sebastian Highlands Unit 13; Little Portion Subdivision Replat Of 11 Sebastian Highlands Unit 02 24 Hobart Landing Unit 1 11 Naranja TR Shellmound Bch Replat of POR 24 Hallmark Ocean Subdivision 13 Orchid Isle Estates Subdivision 24 Stevens Park Unit 1 & 2 * These communities are included in the evaluation due to their proximity to one or more top 30 ranked communities. ** It is recommended that the Amos subdivision not be considered in the capital improvement program. Ranking results are due to an anomaly in the methodology. Community Development Department Indian River County 23 Attacifflent 4 Comprehensive Plan Sanitary Sewer Sub -Element REGULATORY FRAMEWORK The wastewater collection, treatment, and disposal system is regulated by various agencies at all levels of government. Table 3.A.4 shows the state and local agencies involved in wastewater regulation and the types of activities in which they are involved. FEDERAL The Federal Water Pollution Control Act of 1972 (PL 92-500) and its amendments through the Clean Water Acts of 1977 (PL 95-217) and 1981 (PL 97-117) are the basis for pollution control regulation in the nation. The goal of these acts is the restoration and/or maintenance of the chemical, physical, and biological integrity of the nation's water. The act established a national policy of implementing areawide wastewater treatment and management programs to ensure adequate control of sources of pollution. Under a provision of PL 92-500, grants are made available to local governments to construct facilities to treat "point sources" of pollution, including effluent from sewage treatment processes. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency is responsible for implementing the act. STATE The Florida Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) is the agency responsible for ensuring that the State carries out the requirements of PL 92-500. In response to PL 92-500, DEP has adopted Chapters 17-3 and 17-6, FAC. These chapters regulate wastewater facilities which treat flows exceeding 10,000 GPD. The Florida Department of Health (DOH) regulates septic system installations per Section 381.0065 Florida Statutes (FS). The DOH- Indian River locally administers the septic system program for Indian River County. These regulations for septic system permitting are in Chapter 64E-6, Florida Administrative Code (FAC). While 64E-6 FAC does not set the criteria for septic system effluent quality, it does require that septic systems be installed in such a manner that, with reasonable maintenance, they will not create a health hazard or endanger the safety of any domestic water supply. In addition to regulating wastewater facilities, Sections 381.0065(2)(a) and 381.00655 (FS) also establish criteria for mandatory connections to wastewater systems. Pursuant to those sections, public sanitary sewer is considered available when gravity sewer lines or low-pressure lines are in a right-of-way or easement adjacent to a property or lot, when any use producing more than 1,000 gallons per day has public sewer lines within 50 feet of a property line and has access to the lines via a public right-of-way or easement, when a public sewer line is accessible and within '/ mile of a proposed residential subdivision of more than 50 lots, when a public sewer line is accessible and within '/ mile of a proposed commercial subdivision of more than 5 lots, or when a public sewer line is accessible and within'/ mile of a proposed use in an area zoned or used for an industrial, manufacturing, or equivalent use. When repairs or modifications are needed to a use in an area zoned or used for industrial or manufacturing or its equivalent, that use must also Community Development Department Indian River County 24 AttacMent 4 Comprehensive Plan Sanitary Sewer Sub -Element connect to a wastewater system if that use is within 500 feet of an establishment's or residences sewer stub -out. LOCAL In 1984, Indian River County adopted an ordinance that established the utility rate structure and a mandatory hookup policy for both residential and non-residential development. County policy generally states that any development located within 200 feet of a wastewater collection line must connect. In addition to that ordinance, the Utilities Department also has developed and adopted design standards and review procedures to ensure that all connections to the system are compatible with the system's design. TABLE 3.A.4 - REGULATION OF SEWAGE Source: Indian River County Utilities Department Community Development Department Indian River County 25 Attaelent 4 Statutory Agency Authority Scope Activity DEP Ch 403 FS Responsible for all Permits & inspection of 17-6 FAC wastewater treatment plants, wastewater plants over and wastewater flows greater 10,000 GPD. Regulates than 10,000 GPD. Regulates private package private wastewater plants. facilities. DOH Ch 381 FS Responsible for all onsite Inspects, permits, and 64E-6 FAC disposal systems less than enforces all septic 10,000 GPD of domestic systems less than 10,000 wastewater. GPD. Responds to all public complaints. County Utili- Local Ordinance Responsible for review, Inspects all work on ties Dept. Home Rule construction, and connection county public to the public wastewater wastewater system. system. Source: Indian River County Utilities Department Community Development Department Indian River County 25 Attaelent 4 Comprehensive Plan ANALYSIS Sanitary Sewer Sub -Element The analysis of the Sanitary Sewer Sub -Element focuses on the three components of the sanitary sewer system: collection, treatment, and disposal. COLLECTION SYSTEM The principal components of the sanitary sewer collection system are pipes, manholes, and pump stations. Because Indian River County has a relatively new sanitary sewer system, those pipes and pump stations are generally in good condition. Overall, most of the major lines are in place and sized to accommodate future growth. The county's long range plan for growth and development is reflected in the Future Land Use Element of the comprehensive plan. That element defines where the community will grow and where growth will be limited. As indicated in the Future Land Use Element, the urban service area is the area deemed appropriate for future urban type development. Accordingly, it is within the urban service area that utility lines and other infrastructure components will be available. Although regional sanitary sewer service should generally be limited to lands within the urban service area, there should be some exceptions. Historically, the county has allowed sites contiguous to the urban service area boundary to connect to the regional sanitary sewer system, and that is appropriate. There are also other types of development allowed outside the urban service area, where regional sanitary sewer service is appropriate and in some cases necessary. These include clustered development in agricultural planned development projects, new town projects, traditional neighborhood design projects, agricultural businesses, and agricultural industries. For these uses, the county should allow connection to the regional sanitary sewer system or construction of a privately owned system, where connection to the public system is not feasible. In those cases where a privately owned system is allowed, the county should require that a franchise be obtained from the county and that any plants and collection systems be built to county standards and, where deemed appropriate by the county, be dedicated to the county without compensation. The major collection system issues include service area, system evaluation and maintenance, system expansion related to serving areas presently served by septic tank systems, and system expansion to serve new development. Service Area Vero Beach serves those areas outside its corporate limits based on interlocal agreements with the county and the Town of Indian River Shores. For the unincorporated county, the city water and waste water agreement expired in 2017 and is currently being re -negotiated. For the Town of Indian River Shores, its agreement with the city for water, wastewater, and reuse expired and Community Development Department Indian River County 26 Attacffient 4 Comprehensive Plan Sanitary Sewer Sub -Element was renewed in 2012. That agreement is for an initial term of 15 years. Unless Indian River Shores provides notice of its desire to renegotiate or terminate four years before the expiration of that 15 year period, the agreement will automatically renew for another 15 years. Currently, the Indian River County water and waste water service area is comprised of the following: Majority of unincorporated Indian River County City of Sebastian Town of Orchid System Evaluation and Maintenance The sanitary sewer collection system is evaluated with each application for new development, and as each package treatment plant is decommissioned. That evaluation is done using a computer modeling program, known as the "WaterCad" model that evaluates several factors, including pipe capacity, lift station capacity, horse power requirements for pumps, and hydraulic pump pressure. In contrast to the City of Vero Beach, which is largely built -out and has provided utility service for many decades, sewer service is still relatively new to the rapidly growing unincorporated county. Consequently, the county's collection system is constantly evaluated. Within the county's service area, the major collection system problem is low velocity in force mains. In particular, the 24 inch, 20 inch, and 12 inch force mains in the US 1 corridor have low velocities even at peak flows. The low velocity is caused by oversized lines and a lack of wastewater generated. Where the velocity is less than 2 feet/second, solids will settle in pipelines. Settled solids decrease hydraulic capacity. Another problem occurs when a mass of accumulated solids become "unsettled" and reaches a treatment plant in an unexpectedly large concentration. In the past, this situation has resulted in sewage spills. While increased pipeline maintenance is necessary to prevent a reoccurrence of such spills, the recent installation of numerous automatic air release valves has corrected the problem by relieving gases that were preventing the normal flow of sewage through influent pipes. In the future, the county's policy should be to continue to install automatic air release valves in all new lines. Service to New Development Through the Utilities Department Wastewater Master Plan, the county has identified main lines that must be installed along major corridors. Unlike other collection lines, "Master Plan" lines usually do not connect directly to a wastewater generator. While master plan lines are paid for by the Utilities Department with revenue from capacity charges and other sources, non -master plan lines are paid from other sources. Community Development Department Indian River County 27 AttacRent 4 Comprehensive Plan Sanitary Sewer Sub -Element Besides capital improvements programming and the assessment process, another way to expand the collection system is through the platting and site plan approval requirements of new development. For example, current comprehensive plan policies and land development regulations mandate that each new subdivision within the Urban Service Area connect to the centralized wastewater service system, if the proposed subdivision meets either of the following criteria. It is within one-quarter of a mile of existing wastewater lines; or It contains 25 or more lots For non-residential projects, only those located more than '/ mile from the existing system and generating less than 2000 gallons per day are not required to connect to the regional system. Even non-residential projects meeting those requirements must connect if the system expands to within % mile of the project. Those requirements need to be maintained to ensure that expansion of the regional sanitary sewer system occurs and to ensure that the costs of that expansion are paid by the beneficiaries of the expansion. Even when a development project does not meet the above criteria, the project must connect to the regional sanitary sewer system if the project is deemed unacceptable for septic tank system use due to increased health and groundwater contamination risks. There are several reasons for requiring nearly all new development to connect to the regional system. Those reasons are listed below. • Regional systems are less likely to fail. • Regional systems are better regulated and inspected. • Regional systems provide a higher level of treatment. That higher level of treatment allows the effluent to be reused, rather than injected into the ground where the effluent increases the risk of groundwater contamination. • Regional systems are economically more efficient to build and operate, but only if all new development connects to the system. Septic Systems Between 2007 and 2016, 1,217 new septicsystems (average of 121 per year) were permitted. Additionally, during that time period 5,919 septic systems were repaired typically requiring a drainfield replacement. Community Development Department Indian River County 28 AttaciMent 4 Comprehensive Plan Sanitary Sewer Sub -Element Generally, septic systems are a potential source of groundwater and surface water contamination, especially in areas where they are densely concentrated, and the water table is high and waterbody setbacks are less than 75 feet. According to theDOH-Indian River, there have been cases of wells and surface waters being contaminated from septic system discharges. As indicated in Table 3.A.5, septic system effluent is of poor quality by today's wastewater treatment standards. Consequently, effluent discharges can cause detrimental increases in nitrogen, chloride, sodium, other ions, total dissolved solids, and the microbiological levels of the local groundwater. TABLE 3.A.5 - TYPICAL CONCENTRATIONS FOR HOUSEHOLD WASTEWATER, SEPTIC TANK EFFLUENT AND WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT EFFLUENT PARAMETER CONCENTRATION SEPTIC TANK WASTEWATER HOUSEHOLD EFFLUENT TREATMENT PLANT WASTEWATER (Max Day) Biochemical Oxygen 430 150 20 Demand, 5 -day (BODS), mg/1 Total Suspended Solids, 370 50 20 mg/1 Fecal Coliform (per 7.5 X105 5X105 200 loom]) Total Nitrogen, mg/l 84 30 12 Ammonia Nitrogen, mg/1 64 25 N/A Total Phosphorus, mg/l 61 12 1 1.5 Source: Indian River County Wastewater Master Plan Generally, the current system of septic system maintenance is acceptable, particularly for newer septic tanks meeting current regulations. For older septic systems, however, lack of maintenance can be a problem, and there is no program requiring regular maintenance of these septic systems. Community Development Department Indian River County 29 Attac4Went 4 Comprehensive Plan Sanitary Sewer Sub -Element According to DOH -Indian River, a required septic tank maintenance program could reduce septic system failures and associated adverse impacts; however, such a program would be costly and difficult to implement. In the future, the focus of the county and the DOH -Indian River should be on providing public education programs on the proper use, inspection, and maintenance of septic tanks. Several features inherent to the operation of septic systems make them prone to contaminating groundwater without any visual indication. For example, septic systems that are undersized or not pumped every 3-5 years can accumulate sludge and scum, resulting in a poorer quality effluent. When high groundwater conditions (within 2 feet from the bottom of the drainfield) exist, additional fill is needed. Once a septic system is installed and buried, these and other operating problems cannot be recognized until the entire system fails and raw (untreated) sewage backs up into the house plumbing or seeps above ground. Thus, a septic system that appears to be functioning properly may, in reality, be providing very poor "treatment". This problem is more likely to occur in areas of higher residential density where parcels are less than % acre, in areas with a high concentration of commercial/industrial use, and areas with construction that predates 1983. According to the United States Department of Agriculture's Soil Conservation Service, Soil Survey most of Indian River County's soil has severe limitations for the use of septic systems. Combined with the county's high wet season water table, this creates a high potential for groundwater and surface water contamination problems. Since 1983, for new construction, the DOH has required that the bottom of drainfields be at least 24 inches above the wet season water table . To meet this requirement, typically slightly limited soil may be added to the site creating a mound. Also, a 75 foot separation requirement must be met between wells and/or waterbodies and septic systems.. When parcels platted or recorded after 1972 meet minimum lot size requirements ,and the above conditions, septic system performance is considered adequate for developments within the county. Another issue with septic systems is the possibility of septage effluent from a septic system entering waterbodies in the county. This problem must be examined carefully, especially on the barrier island, in areas near the Indian River Lagoon, in areas near the St. Sebastian River, and in areas adjacent to canals, lakes or wetlands. To summarize, the problems with septic systems are listed below: • Physical limitations existing in Indian River County o A high water table of less than 10 inches as described in the USDA Soil Survey is found in almost all areas of the county, especially during the wet season June through October. Community Development Department Indian River County 30 Atta4went 4 Comprehensive Plan Sanitary Sewer Sub -Element o Ninety-three percent of the county's soil is considered to have restrictive low permeable soil strata not suitable for septic system installations • Health and safety o Poor quality of septic system effluent compared to wastewater treatment plant effluent. o Potential for groundwater contamination and spread of communicable disease. o Cost and insufficiency of monitoring process. o Inappropriate septage disposal. • Environmental Consideration o Groundwater contamination. o Waterbody contamination. For those reasons, there is a need to expand the regional wastewater treatment system to areas where existing or future land uses, soil and groundwater conditions, proximity to surface water bodies, and/or lot size make continued use of septic systems unacceptable due to increased health and groundwater contamination risks. The county should allow the voluntary expansion of the regional sanitary sewer system to existing developments within the urban service area. Additionally, the county must determine under what conditions to impose retrofitting on existing development especially areas that impact the Indian River Lagoon and areas significantly less than % acre in size. Some parcels recorded or platted prior to 1972 are only 0.11 acres making it difficult to repair septic systems to code. As indicated in the finance section of this element, a major portion of the cost of service expansion to existing subdivisions is funded through assessments. In the past, some residents have objected to the costs of such assessments, often citing an inability to pay. The county must establish criteria to differentiate between areas where retrofitting is required. Because of the cost of retrofitting projects within the urban service area the most appropriate criteria to use to identify areas to retrofit are increased health risks and increased groundwater and/or surface water contamination risks. When any of the following conditions exist and the DOH -Indian River verifies that the health and groundwater contamination risks cannot be sufficiently reduced by any means other than connecting to the regional system, retrofitting must occur. Community Development Department Indian River County 31 Attac4g�ent 4 Comprehensive Plan Sanitary Sewer Sub -Element Areas with small lot sizes less than '/ acre especially those constructed prior to 1983. Residential subdivisions that meet those criteria are identified in Table 3.A.3. • Areas with intense land uses. Intense land uses means commercial, industrial or equivalent uses or residential uses greater than 6 units/acre. • Environmentally Sensitive Areas. This means areas within 500 feet of aquifer recharge zones, as identified in the Aquifer Recharge Sub -Element of this plan; within 500 feet of any public water supply well; within 500 feet of the Indian River Lagoon, the St. Sebastian River, or any body of water that drains into them. • As identified in the 2017 Septic to Sewer Study: Evaluation and Ranking by Utilities. • Areas identified by the DOH -Indian River as potential threats to public health. • New developments on oceanfront and riverfront lots For planning purposes, a history of septic system repairs is defined as follows: For subdivisions of 10 or fewer lots, this means 20% failures in five years. For subdivisions of 11 to 75 lots, this means 10% failures in five years. For subdivisions of more than 75 lots, this means 2% failures in five years. Methods that allow for a higher level of effluent treatment and reduction of contamination include: installation of a "performance based system", providing a 24 inch separation between the bottom of the drainfield and the wet season water table, and providing at least a 75 foot setback between septic systems and wells and/or surface waterbodies._Generally, the most effective and efficient way to correct the wastewater problem of those subdivisions is to connect them to the regional system TREATMENT In addition to septic systems, public and private treatment plants provide wastewater treatment within the county. In Indian River County, large regional public treatment plants now predominate. Consequently; major treatment issues in the county relate primarily to ensuring sufficient capacity (either on-site or off-site) to accommodate projected growth. If wastewater demand were allowed to exceed the county's treatment capacity, untreated sewage would have to be discharged. That would result in health hazards and environmental degradation of surface water bodies. To prevent such an occurrence, the county must continue its policy of approving new development only when sufficient capacity will be available. In this regard, the county's computerized concurrency management system and its capital improvements plan ensure that capacity will be available to serve new development concurrent with demand. Community Development Department Indian River County 32 Attac4went 4 Comprehensive Plan Public Treatment Plants Sanitary Sewer Sub -Element Besides producing high quality effluent, all public treatment plants currently have more than enough capacity to accommodate existing demand. The following sections discuss the county's future wastewater treatment needs and alternatives to meet those needs. Projection of Future Demand Assumptions The comprehensive planning process is an opportunity for the county to complete an assessment of its long range sanitary sewer needs. Such a needs assessment must consist of an analysis that is more than a straight line linear projection. Future projections should utilize certain assumptions based on past trends, present conditions, and future desires. The main assumptions utilized in the sanitary sewer needs assessment are as follows: • The county will be the primary provider of sanitary sewer collection, treatment, and disposal; • The City of Vero Beach will continue to serve the City of Vero Beach, the Town of Indian River Shores and a portion of the unincorporated county; and 90% to 95% of future new development will connect to the regional sewer system. The county will continue to maintain these policies and evaluate the feasibility of regional system versus package treatment plants for the above referenced type of developments. The existing conditions section of this sub -element provides a discussion of the existing capacity of centralized wastewater treatment facilities, with an emphasis on the county system. That discussion addresses the supply side of the wastewater treatment system. This section considers the demand side. The information for this section is based on the permanent and functional population projections contained in the Introductory Element and on the projected land use patterns contained in the Future Land Use Element. That information is also consistent with the county utilities master plan. To develop these projections, the county used data such as historic growth, population estimates, number and type of dwelling units, and developed commercial/industrial acreage. As with other facility analyses, planning for wastewater treatment facility expansion requires a rational approach to projecting growth over a finite planning period. Past experience has shown Community Development Department Indian River County 33 259 Attachment 4 Comprehensive Plan Sanitary Sewer Sub -Element that using the historic growth of existing facilities in conjunction with population projections is the most accurate method of projecting wastewater generation rates for future treatment facility expansions. Capital Improvements According to the county sanitary sewer master plan, the total design capacity of the county sanitary sewer system in 2030 is projected to be 19 million gallons per day (MGD), while total demand is projected to be about 12.62 million gallons per day (MGD). This information is shown in the graph below. Because all of the plants in the county system are interconnected, there is flexibility as to which plant or plants will be expanded to accommodate future demand. Community Development Department Indian River County 34 260 Attachment 4 Comprehensive Plan Sanitary Sewer Sub -Element Figure 3.A.2 WWTF Capacity vs. Demand I WWTF Capacity vs. Demand 20.00 , s.00 19.00 19 00 14.00 14.00 12.85 12.85 18.00 16.00 12.62 0.62 11.60 14.00 85 •9.60 .87 12.00 4.91 • 4.70n 4.70 5.10 WWTF WTF Capacity L 10.00 3.89 -.- Demand With Concurrency u m M 8. -.-Demand W/O Concurrent 8.00 U 17 6.00 6.00 fz 4.00 2.00 0.00 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 I , s.00 14.00 14.00 12.85 12.85 12.62 0.62 11.60 8.00 85 •9.60 .87 5.72 4.91 • 4.70n 4.70 5.10 3.89 To ensure sufficient capacity through 2030, the county should take the following steps: • Begin planning and preliminary design for expansion when a plant's Average Daily Demand is projected to equal or exceed its capacity within 5 years; • Prepare plans and specifications for expansion when a plant's Average Daily Demand is projected to equal or exceed its capacity within 4 years; • Submit a complete construction permit application to the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) for expansion when a plant's Average Daily Demand is projected to equal or exceed its capacity within 3 years; and • Submit an application for an operation permit for the expanded facility to DEP when a plant's Average Daily Demand is projected to equal or exceed its capacity within 6 months. Taking these steps within the referenced timeframes will ensure that the county has sufficient time to design, permit, and construct needed plant capacity. At the same time, these timeframes decrease the chances that plants will have many years of unused capacity. A list of sanitary sewer capital improvements is provided in the Capital Improvements Element (CIE) of the county's comprehensive plan. Since the county's CIE must be updated annually, projects completed will be dropped from the list of capital improvements and new projects will be added as needed. Community Development Department Indian River County 35 261 Attachment 4 Comprehensive Plan Sanitary Sewer Sub -Element Within the county, a number of existing residential developments are not connected to the county sanitary sewer system. If all unserved developments were connected to the regional sanitary sewer system, there would be significant additional wastewater treatment demand. For a number of reasons, however, most unserved developments will never connect to the regional system. In many cases, septic systems are adequate to accommodate individual single family houses, and there is no need to retrofit existing subdivisions with sanitary sewer lines. Where subdivisions are served by a centralized potable water system, there are seldom problems caused by lots having individual septic systems. Given the high cost of retrofitting existing subdivisions with sanitary sewer lines and given the limited benefits of connecting, it is unlikely that many existing subdivisions will be retrofitted with sewers in the future. There are, however, some circumstances where connecting existing subdivisions to the sanitary sewer system would be beneficial. Those circumstances mostly relate to a subdivision's proximity to a waterbody. Because septic systems can leach pollutants and those pollutants can impact the ocean, the Indian River Lagoon, the St. Sebastian River, or other surface water bodies, the county has an interest in promoting the connection of waterfront subdivisions to the sanitary sewer system. In the future, the county should continue to offer its assessment program that provides sanitary sewer to those neighborhoods where individuals benefiting from the connection to the sanitary sewer system pay for the cost of service expansion. Wastewater Needs and Land Use With the 1990 adoption of the comprehensive plan, the county established its urban service area. The intent of the comprehensive plan is to direct most growth into that area and to provide urban type services to development in the urban service area. Since adoption of the 1990 comprehensive plan, the regional wastewater collection system has been extended to all commercial/industrial areas in the county, including the three I-95 commercial/industrial nodes. As a result of that expansion, the development potential of land within the urban service area has greatly increased for both residential and commercial/industrial proj ects. Although the regional sanitary sewer system service area has been greatly expanded, there are still several areas such as Oslo Park, Vero Lake Estates, Paradise Park and other areas which are not yet served. In the future, the county should evaluate whether or not unserved areas should be connected to the regional sanitary sewer system. Community Development Department Indian River County 36 262 Attachment 4 Comprehensive Plan Private Treatment Plants Sanitary Sewer Sub -Element As indicated in the background section of this Sub -Element, the reason that the county started direct provision of wastewater treatment services was due to problems at private package treatment facilities. In many cases, the problems with private plants were due to the operational aspects of the plant, rather than with the plant itself. Because of those problems and their environmental impacts, the County Utilities Department has decommissioned all but four private plants. Customers formerly served by private plants that have been decommissioned have been connected to the county system. To avoid a repeat of past problems, to ensure the financial viability of the regional system, and to discourage urban sprawl, new package treatment plants are generally prohibited within the urban service area. Consistent with the provisions of the Future Land Use Element of this plan, package treatment plants or connection to the regional system may be allowed outside of the urban service area to serve development projects that meet the following specific criteria: • clustering of residential development within agricultural areas; • clustering of residential development within privately owned upland conservation areas; • clustering development within mixed use districts; or • traditional neighborhood design communities. • agricultural businesses and industries (including biofuel facilities) In the future, the county will continue to maintain and enforce the above referenced policies. EFFLUENT DISPOSAL Another wastewater treatment issue concerns long range plans for effluent disposal. With respect to effluent disposal, the county has several alternatives. Those alternatives include requiring new commercial and/or residential development to use reuse water, retrofitting existing development to use reuse water, or creating wetlands with reuse water. While retrofitting existing development is, by a large margin, the most expensive of these options, requiring that new development accommodate reuse water is somewhat less expensive. In fact, new commercial areas are currently required to accommodate reuse lines. Even some single-family and multiple -family residential developers, although not required to, have chosen to incur the extra expense of building their projects to accommodate reuse water. Community Development Department Indian River County 37 263 Attachment 4 Comprehensive Plan Sanitary Sewer Sub -Element Currently, reuse through spray irrigation is the county's primary effluent disposal method. This method is consistent with the county's emphasis to conserve potable water. For that reason, the County Utilities Department is planning to modify the county's sanitary sewer system connection regulations to require that all new subdivisions of 25 or more lots within one-quarter of a mile of an existing re -use line connect to the re -use line for irrigation purposes. Perhaps the most successful and efficient effluent reuse method currently used by the county is at the West County Plant. At that site, a ±165 acre man-made wetland has been created and maintained with effluent from the plant. Besides the creation of habitat for many species of plants and animals, the benefits of that method of effluent disposal include greatly decreased operating costs. Although the wetland at the West County Plant is adjacent to the plant, such man-made wetlands are not required to be located near a treatment plant. If not located near a plant, however, they must be located near a reuse water transmission line. Because the long term benefit of developing such wetlands may outweigh the initial land acquisition and construction costs, the county should begin studying the feasibility of developing additional wetlands. SUMMARY OF ANALYSIS Currently, the county's sanitary sewer system is meeting the needs of the community. There is, however, a need to expand the regional wastewater treatment system. That expansion is needed to meet the demand of projected population growth through 2030, and is currently planned to occur with incremental plant expansions. While the county's wastewater system works well, septic systems are still an issue. In the future, the county needs to ensure that even fewer new units use septic systems, while also connecting existing septic systems users to the regional system where problems exist. To address the thousands of existing septic systems, the county and Health Department need to evaluate the feasibility of establishing a mandatory septic system maintenance system. Although the county has successfully extended sewer lines within the urban service area, the county needs to continue to expand its collection system to serve the entire urban service area. Along with that, the county needs to expand its reuse system. 264 Community Development Department Indian River County 38 Comprehensive Plan Sanitary Sewer Sub -Element GOAL, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES GOAL Indian River County shall have an efficient system of sanitary sewer disposal that prevents degradation of existing resources, promotes orderly growth and development, and meets existing and projected demands. OBJECTIVE 1 Service Concurrent with Development Through the time horizon of the plan, there will be sufficient capacity in the regional sanitary sewer system to accommodate all new development within the urban service area. POLICY 1.1: New development within the unincorporated portion of Indian River County shall be approved only when capacity is available, either on-site or off-site, to provide needed sanitary sewer service. POLICY 1.2: The DEP, on an annual basis, shall inspect all private wastewater treatment plants in Indian River County. POLICY 1.3: The county hereby adopts a sanitary sewer level of service standard of 250 gallons per day per equivalent residential unit with a peak monthly flow factor of 1.25. That standard shall be utilized for determining the availability of facility capacity and the demand generated by a development. POLICY 1.4: Through its computerized permit tracking and its concurrency management system, the county shall continue to implement procedures to update facility demand and capacity information as development orders and permits are issued. POLICY 1.5: The Planning Division, on an as needed basis, shall provide summary reports containing capacity and demand information for each public wastewater treatment plant within the county service area. POLICY 1.6: Consistent with the county's water and wastewater connection matrix, the county shall continue to allow the use of septic tank systems in rural areas for single- family units and for domestic waste disposal by small retail establishments. The use of septic systems must be approved by the Health Department and be consistent with Rule 64E-6, FAC. Community Development Department 265 Indian River County 39 Comprehensive Plan Sanitary Sewer Sub -Element OBJECTIVE 2 Resional System Expansion/Correction of Deficiencies By 2025 2414, at least 60% of all existing units in the county's service area will be connected to the county's regional sanitary sewer system. This will be an increase from 52.7% in 2017 POLICY 2.1: The county shall continue to offer the utility assessment program to areas with septic systems within the County Utilities Department service area. POLICY 2.2: The county shall continue to offer up to 10 year financing for all utility assessments. POLICY 2.3: The county shall given priority for the provision of public sanitary sewer services to the subdivisions on the list of subdivisions as identified in Table 3.A.3 designated as requiring sanitary sewer service due to public health threats by DOH. POLICY 2.4: The county shall provide public sanitary sewer service to areas where the lack of such service is determined to be a public health threat and shall initiate sewer projects where feasible to serve subdivisions served by septic systems and identified in Table 3.A.3.1 as posing a disproportionately high potential negative impact on Indian River Lagoon water quality. The county shall recover costs through those connecting to the system and directly benefitting from the improvement. POLICY 2.5: Consistent with its interlocal agreements with the City of Sebastian and the Town of Orchid, the county shall provide sanitary sewer services to those municipalities. POLICY 2.6: By 2018, the county shall perform a financial analysis for septic to sewer conversion projects. Based on that analysis and available funding a specific list of subdivisions to be connected to public sanitary sewer system by certain dates will be identified. POLICY 2.7: By 2028, the county shall provide sanitary sewer service to at least five (5) subdivisions identified in Table 3.A.3.1 as posing a disproportionately high potential negative impact on Indian River Lagoon water quality. The county shall recover costs through those connecting to the system and directly benefitting from the improvement. OBJECTIVE 3 Surface Water and Groundwater Ouality Through the time horizon of the plan, the county will have no instances of sanitary sewer facilities contaminating surface water or groundwater resources. Community Development Department 266 Indian River County 40 A A Comprehensive Plan Sanitary Sewer Sub -Element POLICY 3.1: The DOH -Indian River shall conduct annual inspections of septic systems that are associated with heavy commercial, industrial, and manufacturing or equivalent uses. The results of these inspections may be used in conjunction with other items in prioritizing sanitary sewer service expansion. POLICY 3.2: The county shall regularly monitor all centralized sanitary sewer facilities to ensure that they do not contaminate surface water or groundwater resources. POLICY 3.3: To ensure that hazardous waste is not discharged into ground or surface water, the DOH -Indian River shall require samplings of onsite sewage systems for businesses which have been identified as hazardous waste generators suspected of illegal discharges. Violators shall be prosecuted according to federal, state and/or local regulations. OBJECTIVE 4 Water Conservation Through the time horizon of the plan, 100% of the wastewater effluent produced by the county centralized sanitary sewer facilities will be reused. POLICY 4.1: The county shall continue to reuse wastewater by spray irrigation, with percolation ponds and wetlands as back-up. POLICY 4.2: The county shall encourage large volume irrigation users, such as developments with golf courses, to use reuse water for spray irrigation. POLICY 4.3: The county shall continue to enforce Land Development Regulations that require developments that use treated wastewater for spray irrigation to construct and dedicate to the county the effluent transmission lines needed to transport the effluent to the development. POLICY 4.4: The county shall require all new subdivisions or residential projects of 25 or more lots/units within one-quarter of a mile of an existing re -use line to connect to the re -use line when capacity exists. OBJECTIVE 5 Capital Improvements By 2022, the county will have completed the sanitary sewer improvements listed in the county's 5 year Capital Improvements Program in order to maximize the use of existing facilities and Community Development Department 267 Indian River County 41 Comprehensive Plan Sanitary Sewer Sub -Element discourage urban sprawl (current Five Year Capital Improvements Plan is in the Capital Improvements Element of the comprehensive plan). POLICY 5.1: In conformance with the review process for the Capital Improvements Element, the county shall maintain a five-year schedule of capital improvement needs for public facilities. POLICY 5.2: Proposed capital improvement projects shall be evaluated and ranked according to the following three priority level guidelines: • Level One - whether the project is needed to protect public health and safety, to fulfill the county's legal commitment to provide facilities and services, or to preserve or achieve full use of existing facilities. • Level Two - whether the project increases efficiency of use of existing facilities, prevents or reduces future improvement costs, provides service to developed areas lacking full service or promotes in -fill development. • Level Three - whether the project represents a logical extension of facilities and services within the urban service area. POLICY 5.3: In order to guarantee provision of more than the minimum level of service, the county shall take the following steps: • begin planning and preliminary design for expansion when a plant's Average Daily Demand is projected to equal or exceed its capacity within 5 years; • prepare plans and specifications for expansion when a plant's Average Daily Demand is projected to equal or exceed its capacity within 4 years; • submit a complete construction permit application to the Florida Department of Environmental Protection for expansion when a plant's Average Daily Demand is projected to equal or exceed its capacity within 3 years; and • submit an application for an operation permit for the expanded facility to DEP when a plant's Average Daily Demand is projected to equal or exceed its capacity within 6 months. POLICY 5.4: The county shall treat sanitary sewer provision as an enterprise system which is financially self-supporting. Community Development Department 268 Indian River County 42 Comprehensive Plan Sanitary Sewer Sub -Element POLICY 5.5: The County Utilities Department shall fund sanitary sewer capital improvements and expansions through user fees, capacity charges, developer's agreements, assessments and other appropriate fees and funding mechanisms. POLICY 5.6: The county shall identify and pursue opportunities for state and federal funding for the improvement and expansion of utility services including septic to sewer conversion projects and sewer connections. POLICY 5.7: All improvements, replacement, expansion, or increase in capacity of county facilities shall be consistent with adopted level of service standards for facilities. POLICY 5.8: Consistent with the policies of the Future Land Use Element of this plan, provision of centralized sanitary sewer service shall be limited to the following areas: • Areas within the Urban Service Area; • Areas where the county has legal commitments to provide facilities and services as of the date of adoption of this plan; • Areas outside of the Urban Service Area where at least a portion of the site is contiguous to an Urban Service Area boundary as depicted on the Official Future Land Use Map or where located no more than 500 feet from an existing sanitary sewer line that is part of the county sanitary sewer system, or where an approved place of worship or camp/retreat use existed on January 1, 2016 and is approved for water and/or sewer service by Utility Services in conjunction with a utility construction/connection permit filed with Utility Services on or before June 30, 2016. These areas are subject to the following provisions: o The maximum density of such land shall be as shown on the Future Land Use Map, and the provision of centralized sanitary sewer service shall not be justification for an increase in maximum density; and o Any and all costs associated with connecting a property to the sanitary sewer system, including costs associated with survey, design, permitting, line extensions, construction, pumps and lift stations, restoration, inspections, and certification, shall be borne by the owner of the property. Development projects located outside of the Urban Service Area that meet the criteria of the policies of the Future Land Use Element for: o clustering of residential development within agricultural; Community Development Department 269 Indian River County 43 A +4_, „1-.,-.-, + A Comprehensive Plan Sanitary Sewer Sub -Element o clustering of residential development within privately owned upland conservation areas; o clustered development within mixed use districts; o traditional neighborhood design communities; o public facilities such as public schools; and o agricultural businesses and industries (including biofuel facilities) • Areas where, consistent with Sanitary Sewer Sub -Element Policy 2.4, the lack of centralized sanitary sewer service is determined to be a public health threat. POLICY 5.9: The county shall install automatic air release valves in all new sewer lines. OBJECTIVE 6 Package Treatment Plants Through the time horizon of the plan, there shall be no instances of package treatment plant failures, or illegal or unsafe package treatment plant discharges. POLICY 6.1: The county shall limit the use of package wastewater treatment systems to areas that meet the following criteria governing connection to the county sanitary sewer system: • Development served by existing package treatment plants may continue to treat their sewage in that manner until centralized service becomes available. At that time, all development within '/ mile of a county sewer line shall be connected to the county system. Development whose sewage treatment systems causes a public health problem must connect to the regional system regardless of the distance to sewer lines. • Package treatment plants shall be allowed in areas of development outside of the Urban Service Area when such development meets the criteria of policies of the Future Land Use Element for: o clustering of residential development within agricultural areas; o clustering of residential development within privately owned upland conservation areas; o clustering development within mixed use districts; o tradition neighborhood design communities; or o agricultural businesses and industries (including biofuel facilities) Community Development Department 270 Indian River County 44 A Comprehensive Plan Sanitary Sewer Sub -Element POLICY 6.2: The county shall ensure that, prior to the issuance of development orders or permits, the applicant has demonstrated that the project complies with applicable federal, state, and local permit requirements for package treatment plants. POLICY 6.3: The county shall require that issuance of permits for replacement or expansion of existing package treatment plants be conditioned upon compliance with the most updated version of DEP regulatory requirements and Federal and State water quality standards as identified in the "Regulatory Framework" section of the sub -element. POLICY 6.4: To ensure proper maintenance and operation, the DEP shall inspect all package treatment plants on an annual basis. POLICY 6.5: The county shall require all new package wastewater treatment plants to be built according to current federal, state, and county requirements. In addition to obtaining a county permit demonstrating compliance with county regulations, any developer building and operating a package wastewater treatment plant must obtain a state permit demonstrating compliance with state and federal regulations. Those regulations include but are not limited to the Federal Water Pollution Control Act of 1972 (PL 92-500) and its amendments through the Clean Water Acts of 1977 (PL 95-217) and 1981 (PL 97-117), Chapters 381 and 403 of the Florida Statutes, and Rules 17-3 and 17-6 of the Florida Administrative Code. Both state and county permits are required for the construction of a plant, and for any future expansion or modification of a plant. POLICY 6.6: At the time the county approves any new package treatment plants, the county will require, that at the time deemed appropriate by the county, the package treatment plant and associated sewer collection system shall be dedicated to the county for operation and maintenance without compensation. POLICY 6.7: The county shall continue to enforce ordinances requiring pre-treatment of commercial and industrial waste before discharge into the county system. POLICY 6.8: The county shall require all future connections to the regional sanitary sewer system to be consistent with the attached water and wastewater connection matrix. OBJECTIVE 7 Septic Systems By 2020, the number of new septic systems permitted annually will not exceed200. POLICY 7.1: The county shall limit the use of septic systems to areas that meet the following criteria governing connection to the county sanitary sewer system: Community Development Department 271 Indian River County 45 Comprehensive Plan Sanitary Sewer Sub -Element • Commercial/industrial uses and residential subdivisions identified in Table 3.A.3 may continue to treat their sewage with existing septic systems until centralized sewer service lines are extended to within '/ mile of the site. At that time, all residential units in those subdivisions and all commercial/industrial uses shall be connected to the county system. Developments whose sewage treatment systems cause a public health problem must connect to the regional system regardless of the distance to sewer lines. Use of septic systems for new development shall be prohibited unless: o such development meets the criteria set on the water and wastewater connection matrix; or o such development consists of clustered residential development within privately owned upland conservation (C-3) areas. Even under those circumstances, no individual septic systems may be associated with individual residential units. If located outside of any conservation designated areas or areas that are environmentally sensitive or significant, however, centralized community septic systems may be provided to each pod of clustered residential development. o Septic systems shall be allowed in areas of development outside of the Urban Service Area when such development meets the criteria of policies of the Future Land Use Element for: - clustered residential development within agricultural planned development projects; - clustered development within new town projects; - traditional neighborhood design communities; and - agricultural businesses and industries (including biofuel facilities) POLICY 7.2: The county shall ensure that, prior to the issuance of development orders or permits for projects to be served by septic systems, the applicant has demonstrated that the project complies with Florida Department of Health (DOH) regulations Section 381.0065 FS and Chapter 64E-6, FAC, permit requirements for septic systems. POLICY 7.3: The county in coordination with and through the DOH -Indian River, shall require that issuance of permits for repair or replacement of existing septic systems be conditioned upon compliance with DOH regulations Section 381.0065 FS and Chapter 64E-6, FAC, permit requirements for septic systems. Community Development Department 272 Indian River County 46 A ++. „1,,-,., + A Comprehensive Plan Sanitary Sewer Sub -Element POLICY 7.4: The county, in coordination with and through the DOH -Indian River, shall establish public education programs on the proper -use, inspection requirements, maintenance, and abandonment of septic systems. The septic system abandonment process shall be based on current state and local regulations. POLICY 7.5: Consistent with Section 381.00651 FS and in coordination with and through the DOH -Indian River, the County shall encourage a voluntary opt -in provision for septic system maintenance and encourage contractors that provide septic maintenance to document information. POLICY 7.6: The County, in coordination with and through the DOH -Indian River, shall encourage all septic systems including repairs and modifications to meet a 24 inch separation between the bottom of the drainfield and the wet season water table and meet 75 foot setbacks from surface waterbodies and wells. Community Development Department 273 Indian River County 47 Comprehensive Plan Sanitary Sewer Sub -Element PLAN IMPLEMENTATION An important part of any plan is its implementation. Implementation involves execution of the plan's policies. It involves taking actions and achieving results. For the Sanitary Sewer Sub -Element, implementation involves various activities. While some of these actions will be ongoing, others are activities that will be taken by certain points in time. For each policy in this element, Table 3.A.6 identifies the type of action required, the responsible entity for taking the action, the timing, and whether or not the policy necessitates a capital expenditure. To implement the Sanitary Sewer Sub -Element, several different types of actions must be taken. These include: expansion of plant capacity, extension of the collection network, enforcement of land development regulations and ordinances, execution of interlocal agreements, coordination, and preparation of studies and evaluation and monitoring reports. Overall plan implementation responsibility will rest with the planning department. Besides its responsibilities as identified in Table 3.A.6, the planning department has the additional responsibility of ensuring that other entities discharge their responsibilities. This will entail notifying other applicable departments of capital expenditures to be included in their budgets, notifying other departments and groups of actions that must be taken, and assisting other departments and agencies in their plan implementation responsibilities. 274 Community Development Department Indian River County 48 Comprehensive Plan Sanitary Sewer Sub -Element TABLE 3.A.6 - SANITARY SEWER SUB -ELEMENT IMPLEMENTATION MATRIX POLICY# TYPE OF ACTION RESPONSIBILITY TIMING CAPITAL EXPEND. 1.1 Land Development Regulations Planning Ongoing NO 1.2 Monitoring Procedures DEP Ongoing NO 1.3 Land Development Regulations Planning Ongoing NO 1.4 Monitoring Procedures Utilities/Planning Ongoing NO 1.5 Summary Reports Planning As Needed NO 1.6 Land Development Regulations Utilities/DOH - INDIAN RIVER Ongoing NO 2.1 Service Provision Utilities Ongoing YES 2.2 Service Provision Utilities Ongoing NO 2.3 Evaluation Process/ Service Provision Utilities/DOH - INDIAN RIVER Ongoing YES 2.4 Evaluation Process/ Service Provision Utilities/DOH - INDIAN RIVER Ongoing YES 2.5 Coordination Utilities/BCC Ongoing NO 2.6 Septic to Sewer Study Utilities Ongoing NO 2.7 New Service to Existing Subdivisions on Septic Systems Utilities Ongoing YES 3.1 Annual Inspections DOH - INDIAN RIVER Ongoing NO 3.2 Monitoring Procedures Utilities Ongoing NO 3.3 Monitoring Procedures DOH - INDIAN RIVER Ongoing NO 4.1 Reuse Water by Spray Irrigation Utilities Ongoing NO 4.2 Land Development Regulations Utilities Ongoing NO 4.3 Land Development Regulations Utilities Ongoing NO 4.4 Land Development Regulations Utilities Ongoing NO 5.1 CIP Maintenance Finance/Utilities Ongoing NO Community Development Department 275 Indian River County 49 A A Comprehensive Plan Sanitary Sewer Sub -Element 5.2 CII' Evaluation & Finance/Utilities Ongoing NO Prioritization 5.3 Capacity Monitoring & Utilities Ongoing YES Plant Expansion 5.4 Land Development Finance/Utilities Ongoing NO Regulations 5.5 Land Development Utilities Ongoing YES Regulations 5.6 Funding Mechanism Utilities/Finance Ongoing NO 5.7 Improvement/ Utilities Ongoing YES Replacement/Expansion 5.8 Land Development Utilities/Planning Ongoing NO Regulations 5.9 Installation of Air Utilities Ongoing Yes Release Valves 6.1 Land Development Utilities/Planning Ongoing NO Regulations 6.2 Land Development Utilities/Planning Ongoing NO Regulations 6.3 Land Development Utilities/Planning/ DOH - Ongoing NO Regulations INDIAN RIVER 6.4 Plant Inspections DEP Ongoing NO 6.5 Land Development Utilities/Planning Ongoing NO Regulations 6.6 Land Development Utilities/Planning Ongoing NO Regulations 6.7 Land Development Utilities Ongoing NO Regulations 6.8 Land Development Utilities/Planning Ongoing NO Regulations 7.1 Land Development Utilities/Planning Ongoing NO Regulations 7.2 Land Development Utilities/Planning/ DOH - Ongoing NO Regulations INDIAN RIVER 7.3 Land Development Utilities/Planning/ DOH - Ongoing NO Regulations INDIAN RIVER 7.4 Public Education Utilities/ DOH - INDIAN Ongoing NO Program RIVER Community Development Department 276 Indian River County 50 A A Comprehensive Plan Sanitary Sewer Sub -Element 7.5 Septic Maintenance and DOH - INDIAN RIVER Ongoing NO Reporting 7.6 Septic System DOH - INDIAN RIVER Ongoing NO Improvements Community Development Department 277 Indian River County 51 A A Comprehensive Plan Sanitary Sewer Sub -Element EVALUATION AND MONITORING PROCEDURES To be effective, a plan must not only provide a means for implementation; it must also provide a mechanism for assessing the plan's effectiveness. Generally a plan's effectiveness can be judged by the degree to which the plan's objectives have been met. Since objectives are measurable and have specific timeframes, the plan's objectives are the benchmarks used as a basis to evaluate the plan. Table 3.A.7 identifies each of the objectives of the Sanitary Sewer Sub -Element. It also identifies the measures to be used to evaluate progress in achieving these objectives. Most of these measures are quantitative. Besides the measures, Table 3.A.7 also identifies timeframes associated with meeting the objectives. The utilities department staff will be responsible for monitoring and evaluating the Sanitary Sewer Sub -Element. This will involve collection of data and compilation of information regarding facility capacity, expansion, and new development permitted. This will be done on a regular basis. As part of the county's concurrency management system, the county will continually monitor facility capacity to ensure that wastewater level -of -service standards will be maintained. While monitoring will occur on a continual basis, formal evaluation of the Sanitary Sewer Sub - Element will occur every five years in conjunction with the formal evaluation and appraisal of the entire comprehensive plan. Besides assessing progress, the evaluation and appraisal process will also be used to determine whether the Sanitary Sewer Sub -Element objectives should be modified or expanded. In this way the monitoring and evaluation of the Sanitary Sewer Sub - Element will not only provide a means of determining the degree of success of the plan's implementation; it will also provide a mechanism for evaluating needed changes to the plan element. 278 Community Development Department Indian River County 52 Comprehensive Plan Sanitary Sewer Sub -Element TABLE 3.A.7 - SANITARY SEWER SUB -ELEMENT EVALUATION MATRIX OBJECTIVE # MEASURE TIMEFRAME 1 Availability of Sufficient Capacity Through the time horizon of the plan 2 % connected to regional system By 2020 3 # of instances .of sanitary sewer facilities contaminating surface water or groundwater resources Through the time horizon of the plan 4 % of wastewater effluent reused Through the time horizon of the plan 5 Completed improvements Through the time horizon of the plan 6 # of package treatment plant failures and # of illegal or unsafe package treatment plant discharges Through the time horizon of the plan 7 # of new septic systems permitted annually By 2020 Community Development Department 279 Indian River County 53 Comprehensive Plan Sanitary Sewer Sub -Element TABLE 3.A.8 - WATER & WASTEWATER CONNECTION MATRIX FOR NEW DEVELOPMENT * Daily flow refers to water consumption or sewer generation. **The applicant for any development project, where such project will not connect to a centralized system, must sign a developer's agreement with the Indian River County Utilities Department to operate on a private system with a commitment to connect to the regional system when service is available. These agreements shall be conditioned upon demonstration of compliance with applicable federal, state, and local permit requirements. When using a private system or on-site facilities, the developer must construct a dry line or wet line at the time of construction, if required by the Utilities Department. The final determination for the .type of Community Development Department 280 Indian River County 54 A A Inside of the Urban Service Area Connect Not Connect Single Family: Within 200' of system X Outside of 200' of system X** Residential Projects: Subdivision, multi -family, site plan, PD, DRI Within'/ mile of the system 25 units or more X Less than 25 units X Outside of'/ mile of system 25 units or more X Less than 25 units X** Non -Residential Projects: Subdivision, site plan, PD, DRI Within '/ mile of system 2,000 gallons daily flow or more* X Less than 2,000 gallons daily flow* X Outside of % mile of system 2,000 gallons daily flow or more* X Less than 2,000 gallons daily flow* X** * Daily flow refers to water consumption or sewer generation. **The applicant for any development project, where such project will not connect to a centralized system, must sign a developer's agreement with the Indian River County Utilities Department to operate on a private system with a commitment to connect to the regional system when service is available. These agreements shall be conditioned upon demonstration of compliance with applicable federal, state, and local permit requirements. When using a private system or on-site facilities, the developer must construct a dry line or wet line at the time of construction, if required by the Utilities Department. The final determination for the .type of Community Development Department 280 Indian River County 54 A A Comprehensive Plan Sanitary Sewer Sub -Element non-residential establishment which can utilize a private system shall be made by the Utilities Department, Community Development Department, and DOH — Indian River. System Availability: A system is considered available when a collection or distribution line exists in a public easement or right-of-way. Distance Determination: Distance determinations are made from the nearest point of the project (area of development) to the public facility directly through public easements or public rights-of- way. FACommunity Development\Comprehensive Plan Text Amendments\2017 Sewer Policy Update\Staff Report\Agenda Items\PH #2 - BCC Transmittal Review\Attachment 3 - 9 Chapter 3A Sanitary Sewer Sub -Element Working Copy - BCC Transmittal Hearing.doc Community Development Department 281 Indian River County 55 A A terrace extends into and beyond the northwest corner of the county and reaches elevations of approximately 40 feet above sea level. The topography of the county is depicted in Figure 2.17. Overall, the relatively flat terrain of the county poses few constraints to development as compared to a rough or rugged terrain. The topography is also a key feature in the natural drainage system and must be examined along with other natural features to identify development opportunities and constraints. These potential opportunities and constraints are addressed in the analysis section of this element and examined in the Conservation, Coastal Management, and Infrastructure Elements. Soils Soils can greatly influence the value or development potential of land. On farmland, those soils which are rich in nutrients provide the potential for high crop yields, while other soils require extensive fertilization and treatment. Generally, structures cannot be built on soils with poor load bearing capacity unless costly methods are employed to overcome the problem. Soils can also severely limit the use of sanitary facilities such as septie- tank septic s stems and landfills. While wet soils often cannot accommodate septic tankc s sus, ground water can be polluted in highly permeable soils. Those soils with high water tables may also indicate the existence of a wetland vegetative community. In Indian River County, the United States Soil Conservation Service has identified 58 different soil types. These soils are further classified into thirteen generalized soil types and distributed among five physiographic areas of the county as follows: sand ridges; coastal islands and tidal marshes; flatwoods, low knolls and ridges; sloughs, poorly defined drainage ways and hammocks; and freshwater swamps and marshes. The generalized soil types are depicted in Figure 2.18. The suitability of soils for development is discussed in the analysis section of this element and in greater detail in the Conservation and Coastal Management Elements. Future Land Use Element 46 Attachment 5 282 Water transportation is provided on the Intracoastal Waterway in the Indian River Lagoon. This federally maintained water route traverses the length of the county. The nearest deepwater ports are located at Ft. Pierce to the south and Port Canaveral to the north. In Indian River County, rail service is provided by the Florida East Coast Railroad (FEC). The FEC maintains single and double tracks just west of and parallel to US 1. The nearest FEC freight yard is in Ft. Pierce. Aviation, Ports, and Rail issues are also discussed in the Transportation Element. Sanitary Sewer Generally, wastewater is a service that has traditionally been supplied by local government. In addition to the more technologically sophisticated and efficient central systems, traditional methods of wastewater treatment, including s€ptie tankseptic systems, are still employed in Indian River County. The primary purpose of wastewater treatment is to remove solids and toxic chemicals from wastewater and render organic wastes inert. After treatment, the resulting water product is then reintroduced into the natural water cycle. Presently, there are five publicly operated regional wastewater treatment plants operating in the county. Four of those plants are operated by the Indian River County Utilities Department, while the other plant is operated by the City of Vero Beach. There are also three privately -operated package treatment plants in the county. While the county operated plants provide a level of service of 250 gallons/residential unit/day, the city operated plant provides a level of service of 197 gallons/residential unit/day. The combined design capacity of the regional plants i 13,379;000 17,350,000 gallons/day, an amount sufficient to accommodate their combined average daily demand of4,'� ,; 8,780,000 gallons/day. Currently, the service area of the regional system includes substantial portions of the urban area of the county. As such, wastewater lines extend to much of the county's urban area, including portions of all three of the commercial/industrial nodes along I-95. In 2006, the county utilities department had -24-,230 28,167 sanitary sewer customers. With respect to septic 4ankseptic systems, the Department of Health in Indian River County (DOH Indian River`,D blie-Health Unit, T ivi-s of ETlviffmIIen4a! Heal«TI�T, currently estimates that there are appreximately-more than 36,039 s€ptie- lank septic systems in use in Indian River County. While approximately:4-,2-7-2 121 new septic tank c systems were installed in 20016 in the county, that number has decreased significantly in more recent years as the level of residential construction has declined. Future Land Use Element 63 AttachmegA 5 Within the county, many of the older residential areas were developed with well and septic tank systems on lots which, by today's standards, are small in size. The small lot size in those areas often results in inadequate separation distances between wells and septie tankc s sus. For that reason, some of those areas have experienced contamination of wells. To address that health problem, county policy has been to connect those areas to the regional potable water system. Because connection to the regional potable water system is usually sufficient to eliminate health risks, connection of those areas to the regional sanitary sewer system has been on a much more limited basis. Wastewater and sanitary sewer systems are addressed more fully in the Sanitary Sewer Sub - Element of the Infrastructure Element and in the Capital Improvements Element. The impact of those systems is also addressed in the Conservation Element. Potable Water Water is essential to human life and is a key ingredient in agriculture, commerce and industry. Traditionally, water in urban areas has been provided by local governments, while in rural areas individual wells or water systems have sufficed. This pattern is also present in Indian River County; however, it is not uniform in all areas of the county. In Indian River County, the water delivery system is composed of private wells and public water systems. The potable water system is discussed in greater detail in the Potable Water Sub - Element and the Capital Improvements Element. Groundwater sources are discussed in the Natural Groundwater Aquifer Recharge Sub -Element and the Conservation Element. As with the county's population distribution, water systems other than private wells are primarily limited to the developed eastern third of the county land area. Currently, there are four publicly owned regional water treatment plants operating in the county. Two of those plants are operated by the Indian River County Utilities Department, while the other plants are operated by the City of Vero Beach and the City of Fellsmere. While the county -operated plants provide a level of service of 250 gallons/residential unit/day, the Vero Beach and Fellsmere plants provide a level of service of 351 and 200 gallons/residential unit/day, respectively. The combined design capacity of those plants is 24,720,000 gallons/day, an amount sufficient to accommodate their combined average daily demand of 15,990,000 gallons/day. The plants operated by the county Utilities Department use the Floridan Aquifer as their primary water source. While the City of Vero Beach uses both the Surficial and Floridan Aquifers, the City of Fellsmere uses only the Surficial Aquifer. Because water drawn from the Floridan Aquifer contains impurities, that water must be treated to become potable. For water drawn from the Floridan Aquifer, the type of treatment used by both the city and county plants is reverse osmosis. For water drawn from the Surficial Aquifer, a lime softening treatment process is used. A by-product of the reverse osmosis process is brine; brine is water with a high concentration of impurities. That brine is then treated prior to being discharged. Future Land Use Element 64 Attachmgnt 5 Future Land Use Map, the 106,661 units projected at build -out represent fewer units than the maximum allowed by the Future Land Use Map. If single-family development continues to occur at densities substantially less than the maximum allowed by the by Future Land Use Map, then it can be expected that the unincorporated county's build -out potential will be reduced in the future. Currently, comprehensive plan policies direct the vast majority of residential development to land inside the urban service area. Of the projected 106,661 residential units at build -out, 96,029 units (or 90%) will be located inside the urban service area. The remaining 10,632 units will be located outside of the urban service area. Because of the recent municipal annexations and the future land use plan densities expected to be assigned to those annexed areas, the build -out potential for the total county has increased significantly. Upon build -out, it is projected that the unincorporated county and the county's municipalities will contain 188,848 residential units. At that time, the county's five municipalities will contain 82,187 residential units. Of these residential units, 49,474 residential units will be in the City of Fellsmere, while the remaining 32,713 residential units will be located in the county's other municipalities. Use Suitabilitv of Soil Within the county, soils can limit development activity in two major ways: load bearing capacity and suitability for sanitary facilities. Those characteristics are addressed in the United States Department of Agriculture Soil Conservation Service's soil survey for Indian River County. In addition to mapping the different soils, the survey also provides an analysis of the soils. The analysis, which includes the physical, chemical, and hydric composition of each soil type, provides a basis to evaluate the soil potential for different uses. Table 2.12 is a summary of soil ratings and limitations from the Soil Survey. (Soils are also discussed in the Conservation Element). That table indicates that most soils in the county present severe limitations for site development and sanitary facilities. Usually, building limitations are due to the wetness of the soil. The wetness of the soil can result in the ponding of water, flooding and caving of excavation. The wetness also presents severe limitations to sanitary facilities and, in particular, to septie-tank septic systems. Since wetness and ponding lead to poor filtering and slow percolation, wet soils are unable to adequately drain. Within the county, those limitations can be reduced through the use of certain building techniques and standards. Those techniques and standards include raising the elevations of sites through the use of fill dirt and enhancing the natural drainage area of development projects. Throughout the county, septic aseptic systems are permitted by the Depa#fnea DOH -Indian River. To ensure that adequate sanitary facilities are provided for sites not connected to the county's centralized sanitary sewer system, county building regulations require the issuance of a septic permit prior to issuance of a building permit. Several standards Future Land Use Element 78 Attachment 5 used by the DOH -Indian River to guarantee the viability of septic systems include: a minimum septi septic s stem elevation requirement of 48" above the wet season water table; a minimum separation distance requirement between septic aseptic systems and potable water wells of 75 feet; and a limitation on total building square footage based on lot size and drainfield requirements. Because of the limitations associated with on-site septic systems, the county's policy should be to expand the public sanitary system throughout the urban service area. The Sanitary Sewer Sub - Element provides additional analysis of septic tank c system suitability in the county and the regulatory framework under which septic tank c systems are permitted. Table 2.12, Soil Characteristics and Suitability Soil Drainage Corrosivity Irrigation Septic Fields Dwellings Pond Steel Concrete Poorly Moderate Low to Wetness, Severe limitations — Severe limitations — Severe Drained to High High Droughty, Wetness, Percolates Wetness Limitations — Fast intake slowly Seepage Moderately Low to Low to Wetness, Severe Limitations Slight to Severe Severe Drained Moderate Moderate Droughty, — Percolates slowly, Limitations — Limitations — Fast intake Poor filtering Wetness Seepage Excessively Low Moderate Droughty, Slight — Very poor Slight Severe Drained to High Fast intake, filtration. Potential Limitations — Soil blowing for groundwater Seepage contamination Data Source: U.S.D.A. - Soil Conservation Service Figure 2.26 shows soil characteristics which present severe limitations to development. Use Suitability of Topography The topography of Indian River County is generally flat with the exception of several ridges. Due to the lack of rough or rugged terrain, topography does not present any major limitations to development. Only a few areas along the coastal ridge have slopes steep enough to constrain development. Overall, topography is one of the principal influences on the drainage system. Because much of the county consists of relatively low flatlands, many of those areas, including the highly developed eastern mainland, would be underwater for portions of the year without man-made drainage ditches and canals. There are, however, certain county areas, such as the barrier island, the sand ridges, the St. Sebastian River area, and the higher elevations in the western county, which have a topography that results in the natural runoff of stormwater. Going forward, the county's policy should be to require that stormwater runoff from new development does not negatively impact adjacent properties or receiving water bodies. Because of the county's flat terrain, stormwater management systems are necessary to direct and retain Future Land Use Element 79 Attachment 5 ➢ Groundwater Recharge Areas Underlying Indian River County are two aquifers that provide county residents with all water for domestic consumption. Those aquifers are recharged or filled by the percolation of rain and surface water through soil layers into the underground reservoirs. Those areas which provide the greatest potential for recharge are classified as "Prime Recharge Areas" and are shown on Figure 2.29. While excessive development of those areas can result in changes to natural drainage patterns and reduce recharge potential, excessive use of septic tank c systems and hazardous materials in those areas can increase the possibility of contamination of the aquifer. For the county public water system, the public water supply source is the deep aquifer which, because of its depth, is less likely to be subject to contamination from ground sources. Recharge areas for that aquifer are located northwest of the county. Within the county, those areas which contain community wells that draw large quantities of water are especially subject to contamination or pollution. Generally, groundwater contamination can result from excessive or improper use of septic systems and other wastewater treatment facilities, the leakage of chemicals and fuels stored underground, seepage from landfills and other waste storage areas, or surface spills of hazardous materials. For each of the community wells or wellfields in the county, zones of influence have been calculated. Those zones vary in size due to the amount or volume of flow, depth of the well and the porosity of the aquifer. Within those zones, the county's policy should restrict uses that could contaminate community wells. Future Land Use Element 85 Attachmeg� 5 ➢ Summary of Use Suitability of Natural Resources Overall, the natural features of the county provide various constraints to development, many of which can be overcome through modern building and engineering techniques. In fact, one natural resource constraint that has been mitigated through engineering is drainage. With respect to drainage, large areas of the county would be underwater, if it were not for the county's extensive system of drainage canals and ditches. In some cases, modifications are relatively simple and provide minimal adverse impacts to the environment. Where only slight modification is required, areas are generally suited for most types of development. Other areas require extensive man made improvements to achieve even the lowest intensity of development. Often those improvements include the wholesale destruction of important and sensitive habitats. In those areas, development should be kept to a minimum and highly regulated to ensure the protection of natural features and resources. Figure 2.30 is a composite of the natural constraints in the county. In those areas which contain severe constraints, the county's policy should be to restrict development. A review of existing development and natural land uses reveals the following important facts: • destruction of natural areas is most evident in the eastern portion of the county, especially waterfront areas along the Indian River and on the barrier island; • continued reliance on septie—aseptic systems increases the potential for pollution of the shallow aquifer; • the use of septic tank c sstems in soils which are not suited for septic septic systems and development in areas with low elevations require large amounts of fill dirt obtained by mining; • the large amounts of runoff that result from development can lead to the need for expensive drainage improvements, pollution of natural water bodies, and localized flooding; and • development of wetlands, woodlands and other natural areas results in the destruction of natural habitat, upsetting the natural balance of the ecosystem. Wherever development occurs, the natural state of the land is altered, most of it without serious consequences. Certain areas, however, are of such a sensitive nature that their alteration can lead to serious problems for nature and humans alike. In the past, much of the land area of the county was drained and cleared for agriculture. While it is impossible to preserve all natural areas, development policies and land use regulations can and should protect sensitive areas and limit the destruction of the environment. Future Land Use Element 87 AttachmerjA 5 permit the transfer of development rights, and promote the use of conservation easements, dedications, and public acquisition. Policy 7.4: Any development activity in areas designated as environmentally sensitive or important, as defined in policies 5.4 and 6.11 of the Conservation Element, shall require an environmental survey as part of the approval of a development order. Based upon the results of the environmental survey, development projects shall be required to provide a site design which minimizes impacts upon endangered and threatened plants and animals. Policy 7.5: The county shall review and evaluate proposed development projects to ensure that stormwater runoff from the new development will not negatively, impact adjacent properties or receiving surface waterbody quality. Policy 7.6: Indian River County shall maintain and enforce regulations to protect wetlands from the negative impacts of development. These regulations address building setbacks, protection from solid and liquid wastes including pesticides and herbicides, dredging or filling of wetlands, incorporation of wetlands into a site's development scheme, and mitigation of lost or destroyed wetlands. Policy 7.7: Indian River County acknowledges the environmental importance of the prime aquifer recharge areas shown on Figure 2.29. The county shall regulate the development of these areas. Regulations include an overlay district which restricts land uses, implements special siting requirements for septic tank c systems to mitigate soil drainage characteristics, and regulates other factors which impact the recharge capability of the land. Policy 7.8: The county shall protect public water supply wells by prohibiting the placement of septic systems; stormwater retention/detention areas; wastewater treatment plant effluent discharges, including but not limited to percolation ponds, surface water discharge, spray irrigation, and drainfields; sanitary landfills, feed lots and other concentrated animal facilities; mining and excavation activities; and the handling, production, and storage of regulated substances within wellfield cones of influence. Polio: Consistent with the Potable Water Sub -Element, the county shall continue to extend the county water system, enabling the acquisition of small public water systems, thereby reducing the number of residents using the shallow aquifer, which is subject to groundwater pollution threats. Polices: Through the use of fee simple purchase, transfer of development rights, and conservation easements, Indian River County shall coordinate with other state, federal and local agencies to identify and protect vegetative communities identified in Conservation Element policies 6.1 through 6.7. Future Land Use Element 164 Attachme 2 9 5 Policy 7.11: The county, in cooperation with the local 14ealth Depaft wfikDOH- Indian River, shall continue to regulate the siting of septic 4anlEseptic stems including siting requirements to mitigate soil characteristics. OBJECTIVE 8: PROTECTION OF HISTORIC RESOURCES Through 2015, at least 95% of unincorporated Indian River County's historic properties (as identified in "Historic Properties Survey of Indian River County, Florida", prepared by Historic Property Associates, Inc., April 1989) will continue to be preserved in fair, good, or excellent condition. Policy 8.1: The county historian and, as needed, outside consultants and experts shall provide guidance and advice to the Board of County Commissioners on matters concerning historic. and archaeological preservation. The county historian shall be consulted for recommendations concerning: proposed changes to county regulations protecting historic and archaeological resources; and projects which may impact historical and archaeological sites identified on the Florida Master Site File or designated as significant by the Board of County Commissioners. Policy 8.2: Indian River County shall use incentives such as transfer of development rights, tax relief, mitigation, and public acquisitions; and penalties such as fines and imprisonment, to protect and preserve historically and archaeologically important resources. The following criteria are used to determine the historical significance of a resource: • whether or not the resource is at least 50 years old; • whether or not the resource contains significant character, interest or value as part of the historical, cultural, aesthetic and architectural heritage of the county; • whether or not the resource displays historical, political, cultural, economic, or social trends of community history; • whether or not the resource displays unique and/or distinguishing characteristics of an architectural style, design period, construction method, detail, craftsmanship, or material; and • whether or not the resource is a work by a prominent architect, designer, engineer, builder or landscape architect. Policy 8.3: All public and private development or redevelopment proposals shall be reviewed for their impact upon designated historic resources. Policy 8.4: Public and private development and redevelopment activities shall cease, at least temporarily, if historic or archaeological artifacts are discovered, in order to allow for evaluation of historic significance. Future Land Use Element 165 At t achmqwt 5 RESOLUTION NO. 2018- A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, APPROVING THE TRANSMITTAL OF PROPOSED INDIAN RIVER COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TEXT AMENDMENTS TO STATE AND REGIONAL REVIEW AGENCIES. WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners adopted the Indian River County Comprehensive Plan on February 13, 1990, and WHEREAS, the county received comprehensive plan amendment applications during its October 2017 amendment submittal window, and WHEREAS, the Local Planning Agency, after due public notice, held a public hearing on these comprehensive plan amendment requests on February 8, 2018, and WHEREAS, the Local Planning Agency, after receiving public comments, made a recommendation to the Board of County Commissioners; and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners held a Transmittal Public Hearing on March 20, 2018, after due public notice; and WHEREAS, The Board of County Commissioners announced at the transmittal public hearing its intention to hold and advertise a final public hearing at the adoption stage of the plan amendment process. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA THAT: 1. The above recitals are ratified in their entirety. 2. The following proposed amendments are approved for transmittal to State and Regional Review Agencies (Appendices A and B): FACommunity Development\Comprehensive Plan Text Amendments\2017 Sewer Policy Update\Agehda Items\PH #2 - BCC Transmittal Review\Attachment 6 - Transmittal Text Resolution March 2018 - With Appendices.doc 1 of 3 Attachment 6 291 RESOLUTION NO. 2018 - AN ORDINANCE OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AMENDING THE TEXT OF THE SANITARY SEWER SUB -ELEMENT FOR SEPTIC TO SEWER CONVERSION AND THE ASSOCIATED TEXT OF THE FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT OF THE COUNTY'S COMPREHENSIVE PLAN; AND PROVIDING CODIFICATION, SEVERABILITY, AND EFFECTIVE DATE; AND AN ORDINANCE OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AMENDING THE TEXT OF THE COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT FOR SEA LEVEL RISE AND ASSOCIATED TEXT OF THE FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT OF THE COUNTY'S COMPREHENSIVE PLAN; AND PROVIDING CODIFICATION, SEVERABILITY, AND EFFECTIVE DATE. The forgoing Resolution was offered by Commissioner and seconded by Commissioner and upon being put to a vote, the vote was as follows: Peter D. O'Bryan, Chairman Bob Solari, Vice Chairman Joseph E. Flescher, Commissioner Timothy Zorc, Commissioner Susan Adams, Commissioner The Chairman thereupon declared the resolution duly passed and adopted at a public hearing held this 20th day of March 2018. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA Peter D. O'Bryan, Chairman ATTEST: Jeffrey R. Smith, Clerk of Circuit Court and Comptroller APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGAL SUFFICIENCY William K. DeBraal, Deputy County Attorney FACommunity Development\Comprehensive Plan Text Amendments\2017 Sewer Policy Update\Agenda Items\PH #2 - BCC Transmittal Review\Attachment 6 - Transmittal Text Resolution March 2018 - With Appendices.doc 2 of 3 292 RESOLUTION NO. 2018 - APPROVED AS TO PLANNING MATTERS Stan Boling, AICP Community Development Director FACommunity Development\Comprehensive Plan Text Amendments\2017 Sewer Policy Update\Agenda 1tems\PH #2 - BCC Transmittal Review\Attachment 6 - Transmittal Text Resolution March 2018 - With Appendices.doc 3 of 3 293 Indian River County 2030 Comprehensive Plan j%1 A A A Indian River County Community Development Department Adopted: October 12, 2010 Supplement # ; Adopted , 2018, Ordinance 2018- TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION.......................................................................................................................... 1 PURPOSE................................................................................................................................... 1 DEFINITIONS................................................................................................................................ 2 BACKGROUND............................................................................................................................ 4 HISTORY................................................................................................................................... 4 COUNTY UTILITIES DEPARTMENT.................................................................................... 4 CENTRALIZED REGIONAL SYSTEM................................................................................... 5 EXISTING CONDITIONS............................................................................................................. 8 SANITARY SEWER PROCESS............................................................................................... 8 Collection................................................................................................................................ 8 Treatment................................................................................................................................ 8 By -Product Disposal............................................................................................................... 9 PUBLICSEWER SYSTEM....................................................................................................... 9 South Regional Sewer Service Area..................................................................................... 10 WestSewer Service Area...................................................................................................... 11 Central Sewer Service Area.................................................................................................. 12 NorthSewer Service Area.................................................................................................... 13 City of Vero Beach Sewer Service Area............................................................................... 14 Finance.................................................................................................................................. 16 PRIVATESEWER SYSTEMS................................................................................................ 18 SEPTICSYSTEMS.................................................................................................................. 19 Septic to Sewer Study: Evaluation and Ranking...................................................................... 23 REGULATORY FRAMEWORK................................................................................................ 25 FEDERAL................................................................................................................................. 25 STATE...................................................................................................................................... 25 LOCAL..................................................................................................................................... 26 ANALYSIS................................................................................................................................... 27 COLLECTIONSYSTEM......................................................................................................... 27 ServiceArea.......................................................................................................................... 27 System Evaluation and Maintenance.................................................................................... 28 Service to New Development............................................................................................... 29 SepticSystems...................................................................................................................... 30 TREATMENT.......................................................................................................................... 35 Public Treatment Plants........................................................................................................ 35 Private Treatment Plants....................................................................................................... 39 EFFLUENTDISPOSAL.......................................................................................................... 39 SUMMARYOF ANALYSIS................................................................................................... 40 GOAL, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES...................................................................................... 41 GOAL....................................................................................................................................... 41 Community Development Department Indian River County i App e4dix A OBJECTIVE 1 Service Concurrent with Development..................................................... 41 OBJECTIVE 2 Regional System Expansion/Correction of Deficiencies .......................... 42 OBJECTIVE 3 Surface Water and Groundwater Quality .................................................. 43 OBJECTIVE 4 Water Conservation.................................................................................. 43 OBJECTIVE 5 Capital Improvements............................................................................... 44 OBJECTIVE 6 Package Treatment Plants......................................................................... 46 OBJECTIVE 7 Septic Systems.......................................................................................... 48 PLAN IMPLEMENTATION....................................................................................................... 50 EVALUATION AND MONITORING PROCEDURES............................................................. 54 Community Development Department Indian River County ii ApperAx A LIST OF FIGURES Figure 3.A.1 Indian River County WWTF Service Areas ................................... Figure 3.A.2 WWTF Capacity vs. Demand.................................................................................. 37 Community Development Department Indian River County iii Apper?dlx A LIST OF TABLES TABLE 3.A.1 - SANITARY SEWER FACILITIES IN INDIAN RIVER COUNTY* ............... 7 TABLE 3.A.2 - COUNTY REGIONAL WASTEWATER TREATMENT SYSTEMS ............ 15 TABLE 3.A.3 - INDIAN RIVER COUNTY SUBDIVISIONS WITH INCREASED HEALTH RISKS AND/OR INCREASED PROBABILITY OF GROUNDWATER CONTAMINATION ASSOCIATED WITH CONTINUED SEPTIC TANK SYSTEM USE ...................................... 22 TABLE 3.A.3.1 - INDIAN RIVER COUNTY LIST OF SUBDIVISIONS FOR SEPTIC TO SEWER CONVERSION WITHIN UNINCORPORATED COUNTY AND CITY OF SEBASTIAN................................................................................................................................. 24 TABLE 3.A.4 - REGULATION OF SEWAGE.......................................................................... 26 TABLE 3.A.5 - TYPICAL CONCENTRATIONS FOR HOUSEHOLD WASTEWATER, SEPTIC TANK EFFLUENT AND WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT EFFLUENT ..... 31 TABLE 3.A.6 - SANITARY SEWER SUB -ELEMENT IMPLEMENTATION MATRIX....... 51 TABLE 3.A.7 - SANITARY SEWER SUB -ELEMENT EVALUATION MATRIX ................ 55 TABLE 3.A.8 - WATER & WASTEWATER CONNECTION MATRIX FOR NEW DEVELOPMENT......................................................................................................................... 56 Community Development Department Indian River County iv AppeAffix A INTRODUCTION Wastewater is a term used to describe water leaving a site as sewage. Generally, this includes water from the kitchen and bathroom sinks, toilets, dishwashers, clothes washers, and bath tubs/showers. Each day, every person within Indian River County produces an average of 100 gallons of wastewater. This wastewater has three possible destinations. First, it may enter an on-site sem treatment and disposal system OSTDS , usually a septic tank followed by a drainfield, where it receives a minimum level of treatment. Second, it may go to a private sewage treatment plant, generally located near the dwelling unit or other structure. Private treatment plants usually provide a greater degree of treatment than septic systems. The third possible destination for wastewater is a regional treatment plant. Such regional plants may be located many miles from the structure where wastewater is generated. These plants generally provide a consistently greater degree of treatment than either septic systems or private plants. Wastewater treatment systems are comprised of three components; these are collection, treatment, and disposal. The importance of each of these three components varies with the type of wastewater system. This document will address the collection, treatment, and disposal characteristics of septic systems, private treatment plants, and regional treatment systems. PURPOSE The purpose of the Sanitary Sewer Sub -Element is to: • identify existing and projected demand and need (demand - supply = need) for sanitary sewer facilities based on the county's population, existing and future land use, capacity of existing facilities and any future changes to these facilities; • identify the operational responsibilities, geographic service areas and levels of service provided by each facility; • identify those areas where public sewer will and will not be provided; and • identify environmentally sound methods of disposing of treated wastes and sludge from treatment plants. This sub -element will provide direction for the county in planning for the collection, treatment, and disposal of wastewater in a manner consistent with federal, state and local laws. In addition, the Sanitary Sewer Sub -Element will identify proposed locations and levels of service of sanitary sewer facilities. Finally, this element will establish sanitary sewer policies that complement the county's future land use pattern and serve as a means of directing future growth in the county. Community Development Department Indian River County 1 Appdix A DEFINITIONS Wastewater means untreated sewage. Effluent means the liquid by-product of the wastewater treatment process. Wastewater Collection Network means the system of pipes which convey the untreated wastewater from individual homes and other establishments to the treatment plant. Wastewater Interceptors are defined as parts of the collection system which connect directly to and convey sewage to the treatment plant. Wastewater Trunk Mains are components of the collection system which connect directly to and convey sewage to the interceptors through a gravity system. Pump Stations are mechanical devices used to pump sewage through the collection network (force mains) for the purpose of transporting the untreated wastewater to the treatment plant. Force Main means a pressurized segment of the collection system. Wastewater Treatment Plant means the facility which functions to remove solid and organic materials from the wastewater. Wastewater Treatment Process is the means by which solid and organic materials are removed from the untreated wastewater. Level of Wastewater Treatment is defined by the proportion of solid and organic materials removed from the wastewater. The most common levels of treatment are: primary, secondary, and tertiary. Primary Treatment removes between 30 and 35 percent of the organic material and up to 50 percent of the solids from the sewage. Because screens and settling tanks are the most common methods used to remove the solids, this process is also referred to as physical treatment. Secondary Treatment removes between 80 and 90 percent of the total organic material and suspended solids from the sewage. This level of treatment generally requires multiple steps involving one biological process and one or more physical processes for removal of suspended solids. Tertiary Treatment is a level of wastewater treatment which removes the organic material and suspended solids, synthetic organic compounds and inorganic chemicals. If not removed, these agents may cause pollution problems. Tertiary treatment adds steps to the primary and secondary processes which will remove these pollutants. The most common tertiary processes Community Development Department Indian River County 2 AppMdix A remove compounds of phosphorus and nitrogen. The effluent from advanced treatment processes often approaches the quality of drinking water. Septic --Systems are small scale wastewater treatment systems consisting of two components. Those components are typically a septic tank where solids settle out and biological action occurs, and a drainfield where the. remaining liquid is discharged and further treated. Septic systems provide a minimal level of wastewater treatment. Regional Wastewater Treatment Systems are large scale sanitary sewer systems comprised of three components: collection of raw sewage; treatment of the sewage; and the disposal of the treated sludge and effluent. Package Wastewater Treatment Plants are small treatment systems designed and built in modular units and having components similar to larger regional treatment facilities. Infiltration means water, other than wastewater, that enters a sewer system (including sewer service connections and foundation drains) from the ground through such means as defective pipes, pipe joints, connections or manholes. Inflow means water, other than wastewater, that enters a sewer system (including sewer service connections) from sources such as, but not limited to, roof leaders, cellar drains, yard drains, area drains, drains from springs and swampy areas, manhole covers, cross connections between storm sewers and sanitary sewers, catch basins, cooling towers, storm waters, surface runoff, street wash waters or drainage. Community Development Department Indian River County 3 Appdix A BACKGROUND An important aspect of wastewater or sanitary sewer planning involves examining existing conditions. Prior to that, however, it is helpful to consider' the background or history of the wastewater system in the county. That provides a perspective regarding county policy on this matter. Instead of a static view of current conditions as the existing conditions section provides, the background section identifies recent trends in this area. HISTORY A review of recent history shows that Indian River County has owned and operated sanitary sewer facilities for only a relatively short time. Prior to the 1970's, the use of centralized facilities which provide the highest level of treatment and efficiency was limited to the densest and most intensely developed urban areas of the county. Those areas were located within or adjacent to the City of Vero Beach. While centralized sewer service has been available to the City of Vero Beach since 1926, the rest of the county did not have access to such service until the late 1970's. In the past, the use of privately owned sewer facilities provided the county with an alternative to publicly owned, centralized sewer services. Private sewer facilities are operated by private companies which are given the authority to provide wastewater service to specified areas. Most private wastewater systems provide service only to an individual subdivision or development. Prior to the establishment of the County Utilities Department in 1972, the regulation of wastewater facilities rested with several state and federal agencies and often focused on the permitting of new and the expansion of existing treatment facilities. By 1972, the regulatory agencies were becoming more intent on discouraging the use of individual septic tanks and small package systems. COUNTY UTILITIES DEPARTMENT Authorized to develop procedures and standards for utilities in the county, the County Utilities Department also issues utility permits. Initially formed to regulate privately owned utility systems, the Utilities Department was also charged with establishing a countywide utilities system. At the time that the utility department was created, centralized sewer services in the county were provided by the City of Vero Beach, by private utility companies, and by private systems serving individual buildings and developments. A majority of residential developments in the unincorporated county, however, relied on individual septic tanks for wastewater treatment and disposal. In 1973, a master sewage plan was developed for the county. That plan identified the need for publicly owned and operated regional facilities to protect the public health and prosperity of the community. The plan outlined proposed service areas in the eastern portion of the county as well Community Development Department Indian River County 4 Apprdix A as the necessary facilities and capitalization required to implement the plan. The plan also recommended eventually incorporating private sewer treatment facilities into the county system. Also in 1973, the County and the City of Vero Beach entered into an agreement regarding the provision of sanitary sewer services. This agreement established boundaries for areas in the county that would receive services from the city. CENTRALIZED REGIONAL SYSTEM The county's first direct provision of wastewater treatment services took place in 1978, as the result of problems at two private sewer systems. The Gifford system (later to be known as the Central Plant) and Ixora Park facilities had experienced system failures that resulted in the release of raw sewage into the surrounding areas. Because of these problems and their environmental impacts, the County Utilities Department assumed responsibility for the operation of these plants. The Central Plant has since been expanded, while the Ixora plant has been decommissioned. In 1982, county wastewater services expanded when the Utilities Department took over the operation of the Vista Royale and Vista Royale Gardens plants in the southern part of the county. This expansion continued with construction of the West Regional Wastewater Treatment Plant which began operation in 1986. Located south of SR 60 and east of I-95, the West Regional Plant provides wastewater service for the rapidly growing SR 60 Corridor area. In the early 1990's, the County took over the operation and the maintenance of the Blue Cypress Lake Package Wastewater Treatment Facility. Utilities system expansion continued in the 1990's. In 1990, the county completed construction of the North County Plant. Then, the County acquired the South County Plant from General Development Utilities in 1993. In 1995, the county purchased the City of Sebastian's utilities system. In 1987, Indian River County adopted a Wastewater Master Plan which has been updated several times since then, most recently in December 2004. That plan identified a system of wastewater treatment facilities to accommodate the anticipated growth of the county. The Master Plan identifies five sewer service areas. Those areas are North, West, Central, South, and City of Vero Beach. One publicly owned and operated regional wastewater treatment plant exists within each of the five service areas. In addition to public facilities, septic tanks systems and private treatment facilities currently exist and will continue to exist in the county. —Table 3.A.1 lists existing wastewater treatment plants in Indian River County with their capacity and service area. Community Development Department Indian River County 5 Appdix A Figure 3.A.1 Indian River County WWTF Service Areas Community Development Department Indian River County 6 App&dix A �c r _ �••i❖•+�Y•♦.+1� r. li iii••♦iii•� •t U .♦ iMe+.1♦.++♦a.i ►�• fir.♦ +fir W ON IMO Community Development Department Indian River County 6 App&dix A TABLE 3.A.1 - SANITARY SEWER FACILITIES IN INDIAN RIVER COUNTY* * Excludes private permitted Industrial Waste Water facilities SOURCE: Indian River County Utilities Department Community Development Department Indian River County Appdix A PUBLIC PACKAGE SERVICE AREA DESIGN CAPACITY IN OR OPERATING OR GALLONS/DAY FACILITY PRIVATE ENTITY REGIONAL 1. North public IRC regional North of 77' Street to North County 850,000 County Line & North Barrier Island 2. Central public IRC regional 261' Street and Vero Beach City limits 4,000,000 County to 69"' Street 3. West public IRC regional South of 261 Street and west of City of 6,000,000 County Vero Beach 4. S. County public IRC regional Southeast mainland 2,000,000 5. Vero public Vero Beach regional Vero Beach, Ind. Riv. Shores, S. Barrier 4,500,000 Beach Island 6. Blue public IRC package Blue Cypress Improvement Dist. 17.0002&999 Cypress 7. Sun -Ag private Sun -Ag Co. package Sun -Ag Mobile Home Park near 50,000 MHP Felismere 8. Sun -Ag private Sun -Ag Co. package Sun -Ag Packinghouse near Fellsmere 2,500 Packing- house 9. Su -Rene Mobile private Su -Rene package Su -Rene Mobile Home Park 5,000 Home Park' 10. Royal Oak private Royal Oak package Royal Oak Mobile Home Park 5,000 Mobile Home Park * Excludes private permitted Industrial Waste Water facilities SOURCE: Indian River County Utilities Department Community Development Department Indian River County Appdix A EXISTING CONDITIONS In assessing existing conditions, it is necessary to address the sanitary sewer system on several levels. First, it is necessary to differentiate among the various types of systems in the county. This involves separate consideration of the publicly -owned sewer systems, the privately -owned sewer systems, and individual septic systems. Second, it is necessary to identify individual service areas for both the public system and private systems. Finally, it is necessary to assess each type of system and service area in terms of collection, treatment, and disposal. SANITARY SEWER PROCESS Within the county, there are various sanitary sewer systems and service areas. Although specific aspects of the sanitary sewer process vary with the type of system, certain characteristics are the same, regardless of system type. Collection Once wastewater is generated by residences, businesses, industries, and other land uses, it is then conveyed from an individual establishment to a wastewater treatment plant by the collection network. Alternatively, the wastewater may go to an individual septic tank for on-site treatment. Where a centralized system is involved, however, the collection network is generally laid out in a pattern roughly comparable to the branching pattern of a tree. Whereas the smallest sewer pipes connect individual establishments to components of the collection system called trunk mains and interceptors, interceptors and trunk mains connect with and convey wastewater directly to the treatment plant. Treatment After being collected, wastewater is processed by a wastewater treatment plant. Presently, both Indian River County and the City of Vero Beach maintain regional wastewater treatment plants. In addition to those five regional facilities, there are four private package wastewater treatment facilities and the one public package treatment facility (the Blue Cypress Lake wastewater treatment plant) in the county. The existing wastewater treatment plants use a variety of methods to treat wastewater. Once at the treatment plant, the wastewater is treated to remove solid and organic materials. The level of processing of the wastewater is either primary, secondary, advanced secondary, or tertiary. Overall, the treatment level is based on the treatment method and the proportion of materials removed from the wastewater. Community Development Department Indian River County 8 Appdix A In addition to differences in the methods of treating wastewater, the existing wastewater treatment plants also differ in the capacity. of the facilities. Expressed in terms of gallons of wastewater per day, the capacity of a wastewater treatment plant is the number of gallons of wastewater that the plant can treat and dispose of on an average daily basis. By -Product Disposal The by-products of the treatment process are effluent, screenings and grit, as well as sludge and septage. Effluent is liquid waste. At county operated wastewater treatment facilities, effluent is usually disposed of through either discharge to a percolation pond, through wetlands, or by reuse. Reuse is an effluent disposal method involving spray irrigation. Screenings and grit are the accumulated coarse sewage solids retained by the screening process. Screenings and grit are disposed of at the county landfill. Sludge and septage are the biological organisms that accumulate in the plant. Prior to final disposal, sludge is usually subjected to an additional biological treatment process to remove pathogens. Sludge is then transported to the County's Residual Dewatering Facility (RDF), where aloniz with grease they are subject It is Also su eet to aphysical dewatering processes which facilitates tfanspefta4ieft and disposal. Sludge gra septage e dispe,oa of at a speeial faeili,-, at the County land A screw conveyor is used to transfer the dried cake to a truck for hauling to the landfill for ultimate disposal. PUBLIC SEWER SYSTEM The five geographic areas comprising the county public sewer system are: the south regional area, the west regional area, the central regional area, the north regional area, and the City of Vero Beach service area. Within the county system, the south county regional plant is connected to the west county regional plant; the north county regional plant is connected to the central county regional plant; and there is a limited connection between the central regional plant and west regional plant. Because the county's regional wastewater treatment plants are interconnected, there is flexibility as to which plant or plants will need to be expanded to accommodate future demand. At the county's central plant, the county also treats the City of Fellsmere's sewage for a bulk rate. Currently, the city's average daily sewer flow is about 71,000 gallons per day, with a maximum flow of 100,000 gallons per day. Besides its regional plants, Indian River County also operates the Blue Cypress Lake package treatment facility. Community Development Department Indian River County 9 Appdix A In -2406 2017, 21,34s)28,167 (47.24%44-.3"0) of the' 59,61848188 residential units developed residential and commercial parcels within the County's service area were connected to the County's regional sewer system. At that time all e-ust,,mer-s of th +..'s ,s+o,,, ' t„a; , . these o t;.,;. .. e8un,t;+;oma + + t to 24,250. South Regional Sewer Service Area The South Regional Sewer Service Area is located in the southeast portion of the mainland and contains the South Regional Wastewater Treatment Facility (SRWWTF). The SRWWTF is a 2,000,000 GPD facility which uses biological nutrient removal to provide a tertiary filtration level of treatment. Effluent from the SRWWTF is reused for spray irrigation or discharged into percolation ponds or discharged into the 169 acre man-made wetland on the West Regional WWTF site. In addition to force mains along US 1, the South Regional Service Area collection system currently extends to the Vero Shores, Garden Grove, and Grove Isle developments, portions of the Vero Beach Highlands residential subdivision, and other subdivisions within the southern portion of the county. South Regional Plant Public or Private Public Operating Entity Indian River County Geographic service area South County Area Design capacity in GPD 2,000,000 Current demand in GPD 2017 4-�r34;000 813,000 Level of Service 250 GPD/ERU Projected facility needs 1,850,000 gal./day 2030 Effluent Disposal Method Reuse Effluent Disposal Site Various Level of Treatment Tertiary Filtration Treatment Method Biological Nutrient Removal Screenings/Grit Disposal Site Landfill Sludge and Septage Disposal Site Sludge Facility at Landfill Community Development Department 10 Indian River County Appgdix A West Sewer Service Area The West Regional Service Area includes the unincorporated SR 60 corridor area and the area southwest of Vero Beach. Within the West RegionalService Area, there is one wastewater treatment plant. The West Regional Wastewater Treatment Facility (WWTF) is located south of 8d' Street, north of 4d' Street, and between 90th Avenue and 82nd Avenue. This plant, with a 6,000,000 GPD capacity, uses biological nutrient removal to provide a tertiary filtration level of treatment. Presently, effluent from this treatment facility is reused for spray irrigation or discharged into a f 169-5 acre man-made wetland on the treatment plant site. The West Regional Service Area force mains extend from the West Regional WWTF along the SR 60 corridor and along 66d' Avenue from SR 60 to 4d' Street. Force mains also extend from the West County Plant along 82nd Avenue to the Oslo Road/74d' Avenue commercial/industrial node and to the SR 60/I-95 commercial/industrial node. The system serves the Heritage Village, Countryside, Cambridge Park, Indian River Estates, Village Green, Vista Plantation, Lake in the Woods, Sixty Oaks, and Rivera Estates residential developments. West Regional Plant Public or Private Public Operating Entity Indian River County Geographic service area SR 60 Corridor west of 58th Avenue Design capacity in GPD 6,000,000 Current demand in GPD ZQ 171 1,950,000 _2,214,000 Level of Service 250 GPD/ERU Projected facility needs 4,850,000 gal./day (2030) Effluent Disposal Method Reuse Irrigation/Wetlands Treatment Effluent Disposal Site Golf Courses & West Reg. Wetlands Level of Treatment Tertiary Filtration Treatment Method Biological Nutrient Removal Screenings/Grit Disposal Site Landfill Sludge and Septage Disposal Site Sludge Facility at Landfill Community Development Department Indian River County 11 Appgdix A Central Sewer Service Area The Central Regional Sewer .Service Area includes the portion of the mainland generally bounded by I-95 on the west, 69th Street on the north, the Indian River Lagoon on the east, and the City of Vero Beach and 26th Street on the south. This plant located north of 49th Street, in the unincorporated community of Gifford. The Central Regional Wastewater Treatment Facility (WWTF) is located within the service area. This plant, with a 4,000,000 GPD capacity, uses contact stabilization and extended aeration to provide a tertiary filtration level of treatment. Presently, effluent from the treatment facility is discharged into percolation ponds or reused for spray irrigation. Collection lines extend from the plant along 49th Street, between 58rd Avenue and US 1, along 58th Avenue from 26th Street to 65th Street, along 53rd Street from 58th Avenue to the Lateral H canal and along US 1 from 69th street to Indian River Memorial Hospital. The system also extends to the Bent Pine and Grand Harbor residential developments, and to much of the Gifford community. The Central Regional WWTF is presently accepting flow from the North Regional Wastewater Treatment Facility, which is temporarily on stand-by. The flow is being transferred from the north facility to the central facility via a 16" transmission force main located along Old Dixie Highway from 77th Street to 53rd Street, then into the Central Regional WWTF along the Lateral H canal. Central Re ional Plant Public or Private Public Operating Entity Indian River County Geographic service area Vero Beach City Limits to 69th St. Design capacity in GPD 4,000,000 Current demand in GPD 2017 4-x-3488 2,253,000 Level of Service 250 GPD/ERU Projected facility needs 4,250,000 gal./day (2030) Effluent Disposal Method Reuse Irrigation/Rib Basin Effluent Disposal Site Various Golf Courses Level of Treatment Tertiary Treatment Treatment Method Contact Stabilization/Extended Aeration Screenings/Grit Disposal Site Landfill Sludge and Septage Disposal Site Sludge Facility at landfill Community Development Department Indian River County 12 App5i�dix A North Sewer Service Area The North Sewer Service Area lies north of 77`x' Street and encompasses the area between I-95 and the Atlantic Ocean. Within this service area, there is one wastewater treatment plant operated by the county. This plant is the North Regional Wastewater Treatment Facility (WWTF). The North County Plant is an 850,000 GPD facility which uses an oxidation ditch and extended aeration to provide a tertiary filtration level of treatment. Effluent from the North County Plant is discharged into percolation ponds or reused for spray irrigation. North Regional Plant Public or Private Public Operating Entity Indian River County Geographic service area 77th Street to North County Line Design capacity in GPD 850,000 Current demand in GPD 2017 Flow transferred to Central Regional Plant Level of Service 250 GPD/ERU Projected facility needs 4, -54,OW 2,000,000 gal./day (2030) Effluent Disposal Method Percolation Pond/Spray Irrigation Effluent Disposal Site Golf Courses Level of Treatment Tertiary Filtration Treatment Method Oxidation Ditch/Extended Aeration Screenings/Grit Disposal Site Landfill Sludge and Septage Disposal Site Sludge Facility at landfill Collection lines extend south from the North County Plant along Old Dixie Highway to 73rd Street. From there, the lines extend east into the Copeland's Landing residential development. To the north, lines extend along the US 1 corridor to the county line. A force main runs along CR 512, from US 1 to I-95, and north along Roseland Road from CR 512 to approximately '/ mile north of Main Street. Another force main extends west along Main Street from US 1 to approximately halfway to Roseland Road. Collection lines, including a force main along the north two miles of Roseland Road, extend to the Roseland area. Collection lines also extend to several residential developments on the north barrier island, including Sea Oaks, Windsor, and the Town of Orchid. Presently, the North Regional WWTF is temporarily shut down, and the flow is being transferred to the Central Regional WWTF via a 16' force main along Old Dixie Highway from 77d` Street to 53rd Street and then along the Lateral H canal into the Central Regional WWTF. Community Development Department Indian River County 13 Appdix A City of Vero Beach Sewer Service Area The City of Vero Beach sewer service territory encompasses the City of Vero Beach, most of the Town of Indian River Shores (one multiple -family residential complex is excluded), and the portion of the barrier island south of the City of Vero Beach. In addition, it serves some of the unincorporated county area around the city. The Vero Beach Wastewater Treatment Plant has a design capacity of 4,500,000 GPD. The method of treatment consists of complete mix activated sludge, followed by water reclamation processes that include tertiary filtration and high level disinfection. Most effluent from this plant is used for irrigation by golf courses and residential developments. During and iffHnediatel after- per-iods of extfefnely high r-ainfall, however-, some effluepA is disehar-ged ipAe the Indian r-euse. The remainder is disposed of via deep injection well. City of Vero Beach Plant Public or Private Public Operating Entity City of Vero Beach Geographic service area City of Vero Beach; Town of Indian River Shores; South Barrier Island Design capacity in GPD 4,500,000 Current demand in GPD ZQ 171 3,50017000 Level of Service 250 GPD/ERU Projected facility needs 4,000,000 gal./day (2030 Effluent Disposal MethodDeep Injection Well Effluent Disposal Site Residential Landscapes/Golf Courses Level of Treatment Secondary/High Level Disinfection Treatment Method Activated Sludge/Filtration Screenings/Grit Disposal Site Landfill Sludge and Septage Disposal Site Skidge f eili. , at Landfill Table 3.A.2 summarizes the county regional wastewater treatment system. Community Development Department 14 Indian River County Appdix A Comprehensive Plan Sanitary Sewer Sub -Element TABLE 3.A.2 - COUNTY REGIONAL WASTEWATER TREATMENT SYSTEMS SERVICE TREATMENT DESIGN ZOWMIJ TYPES OF TREATMENT METHOD TREATMENT EFFLUENT PROPORTIONAL AREA PLANT CAPACITY DEMAND LAND USES LEVEL DISPOSAL METHOD ALLOCATION IN GPD IN GPD SERVED NORTH North County 850,000 Flow residential, oxidation ditch and extended tertiary percolation pond and 60% Sebastian, 30% transferred to commercial, aeration spray irrigation IRC, Central Plant industrial 10% Fellsmere CENTRAL Central County 4,000,000 1,834,900 residential, contact stabilization and tertiary percolation pond and 100% IRC 2.253.000 commercial, extended aeration spray irrigation includes flow industrial from north regional WEST West County 6,000,000 x;930;098 residential, biological nutrient removal tertiary spray irrigation and on- 100% IRC 22K000 4.000 commercial, site wetland industrial SOUTH South County 2,000,000 1,634,000 residential, Biological nutrient removal tertiary spray irrigation, 100% IRC 813.000 commercial, percolation pond and industrial West Regional Wetland VERO City of Vero 4,500,000 3,500,000 residential, complete mix activated tertiary spray irrigation 65% Vero Bch., 24% BEACH Beach commercial, sludge and high level IRC, industrial disinfection 11% Indian River Shores TOTAL 17,350,000 8;930000 8,780,000 Community Development Department Indian River County 15 313 Comprehensive Plan Finance Sanitary Sewer Sub -Element Financially, the Indian River County Utilities Department is an enterprise system. That means that there is no general tax money allocated for the construction or expansion of utility services. Instead, the County Utilities Department's revenue comes from sources such as water sales, meter installation charges, hydrant maintenance tax, sewer service charges, effluent reuse sales, penalties, service charges, capacity charges, and other sources which make the utility department financially self-sufficient. According to cEounty regulations, most parcels within 200 feet of a county sewer line must connect to the county system. Upon connection, a customer incurs certain charges. Those charges generally cover the costs of capacity producing facility capital improvements. Some charges, however, can be incurred even before connection. Because unused capacity can be reserved for future development, wastewater treatment plants are developed with excess capacity. Since maintaining that excess capacity increases operation and maintenance costs, a monthly base facility charge applies to capacity reserved for future development. Other charges include the following: • -Wwaste water treatment charges • volume charges • customer charges • connection charges • meter re -reads and leak inspection charges • delinquency charges • general service call charges • meter calibration charges • damage repair charges • engineering services charges • deposits required upon opening • charges for transferring or reconnecting a service • additional charges for complex connections Some charges, such as connection fees, vary based on meter size or type of commercial use. The Utilities Department may use these revenues to expand facilities or to modify the existing system. These funds can be used for either capital or operating needs. Another source of revenue, which can be used only to offset a portion of the capital cost of expanding system capacity, is the capacity charge. Capacity charges pay for certain necessary improvements that must be made in order to provide added capacity to meet the needs of new Community Development Department Indian River County 16 App5ix A Comprehensive Plan Sanitary Sewer Sub -Element residents as well as industrial and business establishments anticipated in future years. The remaining capital cost is recouped through monthly charges. As a payment option for extension of the sewer collection system, the county allows a contribution in aid of construction. After the installation of sewage collection facilities by a developer, title to those facilities is transferred to the county. The referenced facilities may be "on-site" or "off-site." These options are discussed below. • On -Site Facilities Each developer is responsible for the design, installation, inspection, and testing of the complete sewage collection system located within the boundaries of the developer's property. • Off-site Facilities The location, size or proposed density or intensity of a development project may make service to the property dependent upon the extension of off-site sewage collection facilities. Off-site facilities are those mains, sewage collection lines, sewage force mains, and/or pumping stations adequate in size to transmit sewage collected on the developer's property to a treatment plant or disposal site. The county's policy is to expand its sewer system in an orderly and economical manner. That expansion schedule, however, does not always coincide with a developer's plans. In cases where the county does not plan to expand its system to serve a project in the timeframe required by a developer, the developer is required to construct or pay the cost of off-site facilities associated with that project when the following conditions exist: such an extension would require an extraordinary expenditure by the county for transmission facilities; and such expenditure would cost more than the county's standard capacity charge. In that event, the county may negotiate an agreement which enumerates the following: • the county's responsibility to provide service to the development and possibly reimburse the developer for oversized facilities; and • the developer's responsibility to construct and dedicate to the county the off-site facilities (possibly oversized to meet future demands). Community Development Department Indian River County 17 Appg�dix A Comprehensive Plan Refundable Advances Sanitary. Sewer Sub -Element In addition to a contribution in aid of construction of off-site facilities, the county may require a refundable advance by a developer to further temporarily defray the cost of any "off-site" extension of water and/or sewer mains and pumping stations necessary to connect the developer's property to the county's water and sewer facilities. This provision recognizes instances in which a developer may be required to advance funds to construct off-site facilities sized in accordance with the County's Master Plan. All amounts expended by a developer pursuant to such an agreement, over and above the developer's need for off-site facilities, may be refunded to the developer in accordance with the terms and conditions of a refunding agreement which the county executes with the developer. When the county deems it to be in the best interest of the county utility system, the County may assume a portion of the material cost of such projects. Generally, refund agreements provide for a plan of refund based upon the connection of other properties served by the "off-site" facilities installed by the developer. Assessment Another funding option available to the county is assessment. With this method, the Board of County Commissioners may assess benefitting property owners a proportional share of the cost of any county project, including utility line extensions. Assessment projects may be initiated by either the Board or property owners. For utility line extensions, main transmission or collection lines (Master Plan lines) are not included in the assessment calculations. Those lines are funded through other sources. Generally, assessments may be financed for up to 10 years, with assessment interest rates set by the Board of County Commissioners in January of each year. Usually, the Board adopts the prime rate. PRIVATE SEWER SYSTEMS Indian River County has four active private sewer systems, each of which uses package treatment plants. Two of the county's private plants are operated by the Sun -Ag company. Those plants are located near the City of Fellsmere, outside of the county's service area. One of those plants serves a mobile home park, while the other serves a packinghouse. Both of those facilities use extended aeration to provide a secondary level of treatment. Effluent at those plants is disposed of through a percolation pond. The county's other private systems are located at the Su -Rene mobile home park and Royal Oak mobile home park in the unincorporated county. Those facilities use extended aeration to provide a secondary level of treatment. Effluent at those plants is disposed of through a percolation pond. Community Development Department Indian River County 18 Appendix A 316 Comprehensive Plan SEPTIC SSYSTEMS Sanitary Sewer Sub -Element The third type of sanitary sewer system is an onsite sewage and treatment and disposal system (OSTDS) which may be utilized under certain conditions when a private or publicly owned centralized sewer system is unavailable„ the ^ my is the individual s •s*o,.„ gNX4�c o... tank. -Septic systems are designed to serve one or a limited number of land usesfacilities and are sized based on estimated water use. Despite major expansion of the wastewater collection network, many r-os,��s—developed commercial and residential parcels within the unincorporated portion of the county do not have access to regional wastewater treatment facilities or package treatment plants. For those land uses, wastewater treatment and disposal is provided by individUal—septic systems. Based on n ^^ ding to di the Florida Department of Health Waste Water Inventory for 2015,E County Health r epat4ment imnurr an estimated 45% of the developed commercial and residential parcels in Indian River County are served by public sanitary sewer and an estimated 55% of the remaining developed commercial and residential parcels are served by septic systems. From 2007 through 2016, there were an average of 6-58-121 new septic systems constructed annually with steadily increasing numbers from 2013 to 2016. Even so, the average number of new septic systems per year (121) is significantly lower than the 658 news stomper year average for the 1995 — 2006 period. The average number of septic systems repairs per year for the 2007-2016 period was 591. within the enineefper-ated eounty between 1995 to 2006 Of these -septic tanks, 5°;te890; wer-e fer—eemmerc There are commercial and industrial corridors that are served by septic systems such as portions of US Hwy 1, Old Dixie Hwy and Oslo Road. Most of the residential septic systems are concentrated in Roseland, Sebastian, Vero Lake Estates, and the ^'a platted subdivisions south of the City of Vefe B^^^'' State Road 60. A septic system consists of two components. One is the septic tank, while the other is the drainfield. The tank receives sewage from the residence or commercial establishment and provides a period of settling, during which time a significant portion of the solids settle out. The treatment process is accomplished by bacteria that gradually decompose the solids which settle to the bottom of the septic tank. The remaining liquid or effluent is discharged through underground drainage pipes into the drainfield where it percolates into the soil. Once in the soil, microorganisms and filtration preeesses ,.,,,.:f -treat the liquids. Evefy tsee to fiN,e-mss; As part of routine maintenance, the accumulated solids should Abe removed from the septic tank every 3 to 5 years by a licensed contractor. These The solids, called septage, are generally transported to regional it -1-it _f -OF tf atme * to disp^'.the residual dewateringfacility acility next to the county landfill. Septic tank -systems provide minimal on-site wastewater treatment for beth -residential and small- Seale—commercial developments. Ceaer-a4Typically.,_a 3 -bedroom residential septic tis system has a 900- gallon septic tank and 375 square Community Development Department Indian River County 19 Appendix A 317 Comprehensive Plan Sanitary Sewer Sub -Element feet of trench drainfield. Commercial septic tanks systems varyepending on estimated water use. . Since effluent from septic tanks is discharged to a drainfield where it is -A"^«XPa *^ percolates into the soil, soil permeability and depth to the water table are limiting factors for septic tanks s• ty em use. To ensure adequate performance and protection of groundwater quality, elevation of septic tanks em drainfields is often required. All OSTDS (septic system) permitting is done by the Florida Department of Health in Indian River County (DOH -Indian River). According to the IRCuT', Indian Diver-C-euhn4y -DOH-Indian River it is challenging to is d€f eult permit ^^yy in whiek to iffst l septic systems installations in the county aredue to several factors whieh aeEeunt €er th4s diffieulty. These f ^*^r^ areincluding: - a hi-gkwet season water table of less than 10 -inches as described in the USDA Soil Surveyf ,,,,a ; almost all areas of the , nt ; and • the presence of restrictive low permeable soil strata, • platted or recorded parcels less than 1/2 acre; and • setbacks from surface waters and/or wells. The areas of the county having "Excessively Drained Soils" and "Moderately Drained Soils" are better suited for septic tares systems. As shown on Figure 3.E.1 of the Stormwater Management Sub -Element, even these two soil types have limitations with respect to septic tank system suitability. While moderately drained soils have a severe limitation rating for septic tank -system suitability, excessively drained soils percolate so rapidly that they provide very poor filtration. Septic tanks systems on these soils have a potential for causing groundwater contamination. Areas of excessively drained soils in Indian River County are tvaically adiacent to waterbodies including canals, St. Sebastian River, and the Indian River Lagoon. Gttffent!-, the IRGHP The Florida Department of Health (DOH) establishes the rules for septic system permitting requires that a septietankasystefhave -a fnini ,,,.., of 42 ffie-hes- of vP�l Community Development Department Indian River County 20 Appendix A 318 -.% 070 ........... _11-10-0,01. .... . ...... The areas of the county having "Excessively Drained Soils" and "Moderately Drained Soils" are better suited for septic tares systems. As shown on Figure 3.E.1 of the Stormwater Management Sub -Element, even these two soil types have limitations with respect to septic tank system suitability. While moderately drained soils have a severe limitation rating for septic tank -system suitability, excessively drained soils percolate so rapidly that they provide very poor filtration. Septic tanks systems on these soils have a potential for causing groundwater contamination. Areas of excessively drained soils in Indian River County are tvaically adiacent to waterbodies including canals, St. Sebastian River, and the Indian River Lagoon. Gttffent!-, the IRGHP The Florida Department of Health (DOH) establishes the rules for septic system permitting requires that a septietankasystefhave -a fnini ,,,.., of 42 ffie-hes- of vP�l Community Development Department Indian River County 20 Appendix A 318 Comprehensive Plan Sanitary Sewer Sub -Element a,..,;. ing soil below the infiltrating surf ee of the dfainfield. During the wet seasonmeFiths a June through October, , the water table in much of the county may be only -is less than 24-10 inches below this i^filtfa4 ag su the existing natural grade. Therefore, fill material is often placed on top of existing soil creating a mound to achieve the required 24 inch separation between the bottom of the drainfield and the wet season water table. This fill material, which provides the depth necessary for the proper operation of the septic tank system, is usually --a higWy pereus sand that eanpur-ify the liquids dice ar-goa inte t o diel.typically contains slightly limited soils that treat effluent discharged into the drainfield. The DOH has determined that the average life of a residential septic system (includin drainfield) is 19 years and that of a commercial system is 10 years. Routine maintenance and proper use can extend the life of a septic system. When septic systems are repaired, the DOH allows. for a drainfield replacement according to the rules in place at the time of original construction. Most repairs for parcels developed prior to 1983 are permitted with only a 6 inch separation between the bottom of the drainfield and the wet season water table rather than 24 inches. In low density areas with adequate soils where septic tanks systems are appropriate, there can still be problems if septic tanks systems are not maintained. Generally, septic tanks need to be pumped on ^ regular- basis pumped every 3 to 5 ,years. While there are private septic tank service companies which exp pump septic tanks and haul away septage, it is the septic tank owner who is responsible for initiating maintenance activities. Improperly maintained septic systems can cause a system failure and a sanitary nuisance often requiring a repair of the septic system. Even when fill material is plaeed en a r-esidential let, there afe still afeas of the eoufftY in whieh there are problems with septie tank systems. Besides soil and groundwater conditions, adverse impacts may arisediefse problem may be to inadequate separation between septic t-aak system drainfields and wells or waterbodies. Without adequate separation, the potential of contamination from septic tafiks systems seeping into wells or waterbodies is greatly increased. n..^s^atl the 1RCH l The DOH requires a minimum separation of 75 feet between wells and septi o-ta s systems for parcels recorded or Qlatted after 1972. ally, theThe DOHS requires knew construction lets -utilizing a well and septic4aflE systema to be a minimum of acre (approximately 29,00)-_21,.780 square feet). If a lot is served by a public water system, a septic tank- s_ ty em may be used even if the lot is as small as '/ acre (approximately 10,000 10,890 square feet). There are many areas of the county in which existing subdivisions contain lots which do not meet the minimum acreage requirements_ for- well a -ad septi^ tank systems. Nevertheless, parcels recorded or platted prior to 1972 that are smaller than 21,780 and 10,890 square feet are grandfathered in and are being developed and repaired based on lot flow allowances residential Community Development Department Indian River County 21 Appendix A 319 Comprehensive Plan Sanitary Sewer Sub -Element utilizin_e septic systems, withe eemeeted to the b' . Table 3.A.3 lists subdivisions in the county urban service area that are significantly less than 10,.890 square feet or constructed with older block septic tanks posing an with increased health risks and/or increased probability of groundwater contamination associated with continued septic system use. TABLE 3.A.3 - INDIAN RIVER COUNTY SUBDIVISIONS WITH INCREASED HEALTH RISKS AND/OR INCREASED PROBABILITY OF GROUNDWATER CONTAMINATION ASSOCIATED WITH CONTINUED SEPTIC TANK SYSTEM USE 1. Oslo Park 2. Paradise Park 3. Stevens Park 4. Durrance Place 5. West Wabasso Source: DOH- Indian River Gounty Health and Ufilitiesgepao4ments Besides the above list of subdivisions with increased health risk and Dotential for localized groundwater contamination, there are subdivisions currently served by septic systems that are located close to the Indian River Lagoon, the St. Sebastian River, or to drainage canals or other streams/surface waters potentially resulting in a disproportionally higher negative impact on Indian River Lagoon water quality. In 2016, county Utilities Services funded a septic to sewer study to identify and rank those platted subdivisions served by septic systems that have a disproportionately higher negative impact on the Indian River Lagoon. The study was performed by Schulke, Bittle and Stoddard, LLC (SBS), was accepted by the Board of County Commissioners on July 10, 2017, and is available online via the county website. Community Development Department Indian River County 22 Appendix A 320 Comprehensive Plan Sanitary Sewer Sub -Element Septic to Sewer Study: Evaluation and Ranking The goal of the study was to identify and rank the areas of septic system use having disproportionately higher potential for negative lagoon impact based on various physical and environmental factors, and to determine the feasibility of incorporating septic to sewer conversion mitigation projects into a 10 -year Capital Improvements Plan. As part of the study, a specific formula for the utility service area of Indian River Count) was developed and modeled after similar studies performed for Martin County (Martin County Septic System Evaluation Final Report; CapTec Engineering, Inc.; February 13, 2015) and Brevard County (Save Our Lazoon Proiect Plan for Brevard County, Florida; TetraTech, Inc and CloseWaters LLC; July 28, 2016). The IRC formula was modified from the formulas used in the Martin and Brevard studies to consider and weigh physical and environmental factors that SBS and IRC staff determined would better represent Indian River County conditions. In the IRC study, the following factors were used in the initial ranking of the three hundred and twenty-five (325) platted subdivisions currently served by septic tanks with respect to potential negative impacts on the lagoon: • Population Density for Loading Concentrations • Proximity to Surface Waters • Location of the Community in Relation to the 100 -year Flood Plain — FEMA Flood Plain • Depth of the Ground Water Table • Soil Conditions of the Drain Field — Soil Type • Age of the Surface Water Management System • Age of the Existing Onsite Sewage Treatment and Disposal Systems (OSTDS) Each factor was evaluated for every one of the 325 subdivisions and assigned an index number that generally ranged from 0 to 12, with 0 being the minimum and 12 being the maximum impact. The formula used to determine the ranking was simply the sum of all factor values for that subdivision. The higher the sum (the "score"), the higher the estimated potential negative impact to the Indian River Lagoon (IRL). SBS and IRC staff .agreed to weight the "Population Densitv" and "Proximity to Surface Waters" factors in the IRC study, because those two factors are believed to cause a higher negative impact than the other factors. In the study, the 325 subdivisions served by septic systems were ranked in order where number 1 had the highest negative lagoon impact (89.19) and number 325 had the lowest negative impact (26.97). Once the initial ranking was finalized, an Engineers Opinion of Probable Cost (OPC) was estimated for the top thirty five (35) ranked subdivisions havingthe he hi hest negative impacts. Those top 3 5 ranked subdivisions were further evaluated based on the following factors: 1. Aquatic Health - Environmental Impact Evaluation or the Initial Ranking 2. Sewer System Evaluation and Cost Data 3. Total Nitrogen (TN)/Total Phosphorus (TP) 4. Public Health - Based on the availability of potable water Community Development Department Indian River County 23 Appendix A Comprehensive Plan Sanitary Sewer Sub -Element The study evaluated the total nitrogen (TN) and total phosphorus (TP) that could be removed from the environment by septic to sewer conversion and calculated a cost per pound for TN removal for each of the top 35 ranked subdivisions. TP calculations were removed from the analysis since most technical references and studies show that phosphorus is adequately removed by a properly functioning septic system. Septic to sewer conversion projects for the top 35 subdivisions were then ranked for the highest benefit to cost ratio, with the number 1 ranking providing the greatest benefit compared to the conversion project cost (see Table 3.A.3.1). TABLE 3.A.3.1 - INDIAN RIVER COUNTY LIST OF SUBDIVISIONS FOR SEPTIC TO SEWER CONVERSION WITHIN UNINCORPORATED COUNTY; AND CITY OF SEBASTIAN, AND T03AI T OF ORGH4P Rank Subdivision Name Rank Subdivision Name Rank Subdivision Name 1 Floravon Shores Subdivision 14 Sebastian Highlands Unit 02 24 Dales Landing Subdivision Tropic Colony Subdivision Replat PG 2 2 Sebastian Highlands Unit 02 Collier 14 Hobart Landing Unit 3 24 Ames r —* 3 Sebastian Highlands Unit 05 16 River Shores Estates Units 1- 29 Winter Grove Subdivision 4 4 Hobart Landing Unit 2 17 Pine Tree Park Units 1-4 29 Kanawah Acres 5 Orchid Island No. 2 17 Indian River Heights Units 1 31 Tropic Colony Subdivision -9 5 Sebastian Highlands Unit 04 17 Sebastian Highlands Unit 02 32 Halleluiah Acres Replat PG 3 7 Orchid Island No. 1 20 Rain Tree Corner Subdivision 33 Little Portion Subdivision Replat OF 8 Sebastian Highlands Unit 01 21 Diana Park Subdivision 34 Sebastian Highlands Unit 02 Replat PG 4 * 8 Ambersand Beach Sub No 1 & 2 22 Verona Estates Subdivision 35 Heritage Trace at Hobart* 10 Sebastian Highlands Unit 03 22 Sebastian Highlands Unit 13; Little Portion Subdivision Replat Of 11 Sebastian Highlands Unit 02 24 Hobart Landing Unit 1 11 Narania TR Shellmound Bch Replat of POR 24 Hallmark Ocean Subdivision 13 Orchid Isle Estates Subdivision 24 Stevens Park Unit 1 & 2 * These communities are included in the evaluation due to their proximity to one or more top 30 ranked communities. ** It is recommended that the Amos subdivision not be considered in the capital improvement program. Ranking results are due to an anomaly in the methodology. Community Development Department Indian River County 24 Appendix A Comprehensive Plan Sanitary Sewer Sub -Element REGULATORY FRAMEWORK The wastewater collection, treatment, and disposal system is regulated by various agencies at all levels of government. Table 3.A.4 shows the state and local agencies involved in wastewater regulation and the types of activities in which they are involved. FEDERAL The Federal Water Pollution Control Act of 1972 (PL 92-500) and its amendments through the Clean Water Acts of 1977 (PL 95-217) and 1981 (PL 97-117) are the basis for pollution control regulation in the nation. The goal of these acts is the restoration and/or maintenance of the chemical, physical, and biological integrity of the nation's water. The act established a national policy of implementing areawide wastewater treatment and management programs to ensure adequate control of sources of pollution. Under a provision of PL 92-500, grants are made available to local governments to construct facilities to treat "point sources" of pollution, including effluent from sewage treatment processes. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency is responsible for implementing the act. STATE The Florida Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) is the agency responsible for ensuring that the State carries out the requirements of PL 92-500. In response to PL 92-500, DEP has adopted Chapters 17-3 and 17-6, FAC. These chapters regulate wastewater facilities which treat flows exceeding 10,000 GPD. IAVTthin- the St Ae-,4The Florida Department of Health (DOH) regulates septic tanks and dr-ainfield system installations per Section 381.0065 Florida .Statutes (FS). ha eget, eeuf --, *'^ The DOH - Indian River locally administers the septic system program for Indian River Count_ has an effi�e to regulate septic syste._,s These regulations for septic system permitting are jiewe been adopted by (tile in Chapter 64E-6, Florida Administrative Code (FAC). While 64E-6 FAC does not set the criteria for septic tafik-s sy tem effluent quality, it does require that septics -systems be installed in such a manner that, with reasonable maintenance, they will not create a health hazard or endanger the safety of any domestic water supply. In addition to regulating wastewater facilities, 64E 6Sections 381.0065(2)(a) and 381.00655 FS also establishes criteria for mandatory connections to wastewater systems . systems. Aeeer-ding to that r-egttla4ien, !aad uses tha4 are within 500 feet of a gr-a:vity line or- 1000 eenaeet to the utilities sysiem. Pursuant to those sections, pPublic sanitary sewer is considered available when gravity sewer lines or low-pressure lines are in a right-of-way or easement adjacent to a property or lot, when any use producing more than 1,000 gallons per day has public sewer lines within 50 feet of a property line and has access to the lines via a public right-of-way or easement, when a public sewer line is accessible and within 1/4 mile of a proposed residential subdivision of more than 50 lots, when a public sewer line is accessible and within 1/ mile of a Community Development Department Indian River County 25 Appendix A Comprehensive Plan Sanitary Sewer Sub -Element proposed commercial subdivision of more than 5 lots, or when a public sewer line is accessible and within '/ mile of a proposed use in an area zoned or used for an industrial, manufacturing, or equivalent use. When repairs or modifications are needed to a use in an area zoned or used for industrial or manufacturing or its equivalent, that use must also connect to a wastewater system if that use is within 500 feet of an establishment's or residences sewer stub -out. LOCAL In 1984, Indian River County adopted an ordinance that established the utility rate structure and a mandatory hookup policy for both residential and non-residential development. County policy generally states that any development located within 200 feet of a wastewater collection line must connect. In addition to that ordinance, the Utilities Department also has developed and adopted design standards and review procedures to ensure that all connections to the system are compatible with the system's design. TABLE 3.A.4 - REGULATION OF SEWAGE Source: Indian River County Utilities Department Community Development Department Indian River County 26 Appendix A Statutory Agency Authority Scope Activity DEP Ch 403 FS Responsible for all Permits & inspection of 17-6 FAC wastewater treatment plants, wastewater plants over and wastewater flows greater 10,000 GPD. Regulates than 10,000 GPD. Regulates private package private wastewater plants. facilities. DOH; Ch 381 FS Responsible for all onsite Inspects, tests ep rmits, County 64E-6 FAC disposal systems less than and enforces all septic Heal 10,000 GPD of domestic systems less than 10,000 Dept wastewater. GPD. Responds to all public complaints. County Utili- Local Ordinance Responsible for review, -and Inspects all work on ties Dept. Home Rule construction, and connection county public to 4 -the public wastewater wastewater system. system. Regulates 4a fl,.hise of private wastewater- plants. paekage faEilities. Wi;4 not efmit pae!Eage plantsunder- 20,000 GPD eapaeit�- Source: Indian River County Utilities Department Community Development Department Indian River County 26 Appendix A Comprehensive Plan ANALYSIS Sanitary Sewer Sub -Element The analysis of the Sanitary Sewer Sub -Element focuses on the three components of the sanitary sewer system: collection, treatment, and disposal. COLLECTION SYSTEM The principal components of the sanitary sewer collection system are pipes, manholes, and pump stations. Because Indian River County has a relatively new sanitary sewer system, those pipes and pump stations are generally in good condition. Overall, most of the major lines are in place and sized to accommodate future growth. The county's long range plan for growth and development is reflected in the Future Land Use Element of the comprehensive plan. That element defines where the community will grow and where growth will be limited. As indicated in the Future Land Use Element, the urban service area is the area deemed appropriate for future urban type development. Accordingly, it is within the urban service area that utility lines and other infrastructure components will be available. Although regional sanitary sewer service should generally be limited to lands within the urban service area, there should be some exceptions. Historically, the county has allowed sites contiguous to the urban service area boundary to connect to the regional sanitary sewer system, and that is appropriate. There are also other types of development allowed outside the urban service area, where regional sanitary sewer service is appropriate and in some cases necessary. These include clustered development in agricultural planned development projects, new town projects, traditional neighborhood design projects, agricultural businesses, and agricultural industries. For these uses, the county should allow connection to the regional sanitary sewer system or construction of a privately owned system, where connection to the public system is not feasible. In those cases where a privately owned system is allowed, the county should require that a franchise be obtained from the county and that any plants and collection systems be built to county standards and, where deemed appropriate by the county, be dedicated to the county without compensation. The major collection system issues include service area, system evaluation and maintenance, system expansion related to serving areas presently served by septic tank systems, and system expansion to serve new development. Service Area Although the saaitai-y sewer- sen,iee areas feF the eettpAy and the City of Ver -9 Beae-h- W;vp hopn set for- man�, years, r-eeen4 eN,effts have inifiated ipAefest in feeensider-ation of these s by the City of Vefe Beaeh. Community Development Department Indian River County 27 Appendix A Comprehensive Plan Sanitary Sewer Sub -Element Guffentl�, Vero Beach serves those areas outside its corporate limits based on interlocal agreements with the county and the Town of Indian River Shores. For the unincorporated county, the city water and waste water agreement expired in 2017 and is currently being re- negotiated. For the Town of Indian River Shores, its agreement with the city for water, wastewater, and reuse expired and was renewed in 2012. That agreement is for an initial term of 15 years. Unless Indian River Shores provides notice of its desire to renegotiate or terminate four years before the expiration of that 15 year period, the agreement will automatically renew for another 15 ears. Mq ile these , ee 0pAs expiren 2017, the e .,ty a fi Ve f Town must p : to fletiee to the City by 2012 if 0410-taf ahe, eVA-1-14-4y or- the Town wanAs te Waiffmin-a-te it,-; agreement off the 2017 tv,.,,,;,.,.,t:.�ff dMe Currently, the Indian River County water and waste, water service area is comprised of the following: • Majority of unincorporated Indian River County • City of Sebastian • Town of Orchid System Evaluation and Maintenance The sanitary sewer collection system is evaluated with each application for new development, and as each package treatment plant is decommissioned. That evaluation is done using a computer modeling program, known as the "WaterCad" model that evaluates several factors, including pipe capacity, lift station capacity, horse power requirements for pumps, and hydraulic pump pressure. In contrast to the City of Vero Beach, which is largely built -out and has provided utility service for many decades, sewer service is still relatively new to . the rapidly Community Development Department Indian River County 28 App32nGdix A "a 11MMP Currently, the Indian River County water and waste, water service area is comprised of the following: • Majority of unincorporated Indian River County • City of Sebastian • Town of Orchid System Evaluation and Maintenance The sanitary sewer collection system is evaluated with each application for new development, and as each package treatment plant is decommissioned. That evaluation is done using a computer modeling program, known as the "WaterCad" model that evaluates several factors, including pipe capacity, lift station capacity, horse power requirements for pumps, and hydraulic pump pressure. In contrast to the City of Vero Beach, which is largely built -out and has provided utility service for many decades, sewer service is still relatively new to . the rapidly Community Development Department Indian River County 28 App32nGdix A Comprehensive Plan Sanitary Sewer Sub -Element growing unincorporated county. Consequently, the county's collection system is constantly evaluated. Within the county's service area, the major collection system problem is low velocity in force mains. In particular, the 24 inch, 20 inch, and 12 inch force mains in the US 1 corridor have low velocities even at peak flows. The low velocity is caused by oversized lines and a lack of wastewater generated. Where the velocity is less than 2 feet/second, solids will settle in pipelines. Settled solids decrease hydraulic capacity. Another problem occurs when a mass of accumulated solids become "unsettled" and reaches a treatment plant in an unexpectedly large concentration. In the past, this situation has resulted in sewage spills. While increased pipeline maintenance is necessary to prevent a reoccurrence of such spills, the recent installation of numerous automatic air release valves has corrected the problem by relieving gases that were preventing the normal flow of sewage through influent pipes. In the future, the county's policy should be to continue to install automatic air release valves in all new lines. Service to New Development Through the Utilities Department Wastewater Master Plan, the county has identified main lines that must be installed along major corridors. Unlike other collection lines, "Master Plan" lines usually do not connect directly to a wastewater generator. While master plan lines are paid for by the Utilities Department with revenue from capacity charges and other sources, non -master plan lines are paid from other sources. Besides capital improvements programming and the assessment process, another way to expand the collection system is through the platting and site plan approval requirements of new development. For example, current comprehensive plan policies and land development regulations mandate that each new subdivision within the Urban Service Area connect to the centralized wastewater service system, if the proposed subdivision meets either of the following criteria. It is within one-quarter of a mile of existing wastewater lines; or It contains 25 or more lots - For non-residential projects, only those located more than % mile from the existing system and generating less than 2000 gallons per day are not required to connect to the regional system. Even non-residential projects meeting those requirements must connect if the system expands to within'/ mile of the project. Those requirements need to be maintained to ensure that expansion of the regional sanitary sewer system occurs and to ensure that the costs of that expansion are paid by the beneficiaries of the Community Development Department Indian River County 29 Appendix A Comprehensive Plan Sanitary Sewer Sub -Element expansion. Even when a development project does not meet the above criteria, the project must connect to the regional sanitary sewer system if the project is deemed unacceptable for septic tank system use due to increased health and groundwater contamination risks. There are several reasons for requiring nearly all new development to connect to the regional system. Those reasons are listed below. • Regional systems are less likely to fail. • Regional systems are better regulated and inspected. • Regional systems provide a higher level of treatment. That higher level of treatment allows the effluent to be reused, rather than injected into the ground where the effluent increases the risk of groundwater contamination. • Regional systems are economically more efficient to build and operate, but only if all new development connects to the system. Septic sSystems Between X99-5-2007 and 20016, 7,239-1,217 new septics sy tems (average of 65.8121 per year) were permitted. Additionally, during that time period 5,919 septic systems were repaired typically requiring a drainfield replacement. within the eetffity. Generally, septic *"�systems are a potential source of groundwater and surface water contamination, especially in areas where they are densely concentrated, and the water table is high and waterbody setbacks are less than 75 feet. According to the IRC14DDOH-Indian River, there have been afe-many -cases of en reeer- of ^ - "'^ ;.*ater s^�wells and surface waters being contaminatedheeefning polluted due e septic tank --diseha ges from septic system discharges. As indicated in Table 3.A.5, septic �anlE, sy tem effluent is of poor quality by today's wastewater treatment standards. Consequently, effluent discharges can cause detrimental increases in nitrogen, chloride, sodium, other ions, total dissolved solids, and the microbiological levels of the local groundwater. Community Development Department Indian River County 30 App32ngdix A Comprehensive Plan Sanitary Sewer Sub -Element TABLE 3.A.5 - TYPICAL CONCENTRATIONS FOR HOUSEHOLD WASTEWATER, SEPTIC TANK EFFLUENT AND WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT EFFLUENT PARAMETER CONCENTRATION SEPTIC TANK WASTEWATER HOUSEHOLD EFFLUENT TREATMENT PLANT WASTEWATER Max Da Biochemical Oxygen 430 150 20 Demand, 5 -day (BODS), mg/1 Total Suspended Solids, 370 50 20 mg/ l Fecal Coliform (per 7.5 X105 5X101 200 loom]) Total Nitrogen, mg/1 84 30 3912 Ammonia Nitrogen, mg/l 64 25 N/A Total Phosphateorus, 61 12 61_5 mg/1 Source: Indian River County Wastewater Master Plan Generally, the current system of septic tamessy tem maintenance is acceptable, particularly for newer septic tanks meeting current regulations. For older septic-tanksystems, however, lack of maintenance can be a problem, and there is no program requiring regular maintenance of these septicmssystems. According to the County Health Deem men DOH -Indian River, a required septic tank maintenance program could reduce septic tank- sy tem failures and associated adverse impacts; however, such a program would be costly and difficult to implement. In the future, the focus of the county and the TD�DOH-Indian River should be on providing public education programs on the proper use, inspection, and maintenance of septic tanks. Several features inherent to the operation of septic tank systems make them prone to contaminating groundwater without any visual indication. For example, septic -s sy tems that are undersized or not emptied ef4en one i hpumped every 3-5 years can accumulate sludge and scum, resulting in a poorer quality effluent. 1 -f -When high groundwater conditions (within 3 to ^ f of A -f ,7r;,i.,f-ieaI d Q_'a-11^ti. ^^'' feet from the bottom of the drainfield) exist, additional fill is needed. Once a septic tank -system is installed and buried, these and other operating problems cannot be recognized until the entire system fails and raw (untreated) sewage backs up into the house plumbing or seeps above ground. Thus, a septic tanlE system that appears to be functioning properly may, in reality, be providing very poor "treatment". This problem is more likely to occur in areas of higher residential density where parcels are less than % acre, in Community Development Department Indian River County 31 App32n9dix A Comprehensive Plan Sanitary Sewer Sub -Element areas with a high concentration of commercial/industrial use, and areas with construction that predates 1983. - According to the United States Department of Agriculture's Soil Conservation Service, Soil Survey most of Indian River County's soil has severe limitations for the use of septic tank systems. Combined with the cEounty's high wet season water table, this creates a high potential for groundwater and surface water contamination problems. Since 1983, F^r ��for new construction, the TD�DOH- has requiresd that the bottom of drainfields be at least 424 inches above the wet season water table-. To meet this requirement, fill .....,tori.,' or an ap r^ —ea RAnd fi _ypically slightly limited soil may be added to the site creating a mound. Also, a X75 foot separation requirement must be met between wells and/or waterbodies and septic systems. ^-i^r+ must be "'^+ When parcels platted or recorded after 1972 meet minimum lot size requirements Under- then nd the above conditions, septic system performance is considered adequate for developments within the cEounty. Another proble Tissue with septic systems is the possibility of wastewater septage lute effluent from a septics sy tem entering open bodies ^r water waterbodies in the cGounty. This problem must be examined carefully, especially on the barrier island, in areas near the Indian River Lagoon, in areas near the St. Sebastian River, and in areas adjacent to canals, lakes or wetlands. To summarize, the problems with septic systems are listed below: • Physical limitations existing in Indian River County o A high water table of less than 10 inches as described in the USDA Soil Survey is found in almost all areas of the county, especially during the months of the wet season June through October. o Ninety-three percent of the county's soil has an tmderlying sedie herizen (a r-estr etive layer e€ten-eomprisede€sandy elay beam) and, thefe€ere, is not suitable for septie tan of design and eenstri etio , of septic to -W is considered to have restrictive low permeable soil strata not suitable for septic system installations - Community Development Department Indian River County 32 App33nodix A Comprehensive Plan • Health and safety Sanitary Sewer Sub -Element o Poor quality of septic tas s_ ty em effluent compared to wastewater treatment plant effluent. o High Potential fore€ groundwater contamination and spread of communicable disease. o Cost and insufficiency of monitoring process. o Inappropriate septage disposal. • Environmental Consideration o Groundwater contamination. o Lealehate to stwfaee water- bodies Waterbody contamination. For those reasons, there is a need to expand the regional wastewater treatment system to areas where existing or future land uses, soil and groundwater conditions, proximity to surface water bodies, and/or lot size make continued use of septic systems unacceptable due to increased health and groundwater contamination risks. With this i mind, *The county should always allow the voluntary expansion of the regional sanitary sewer system to existing developments within the urban service area. Additionally, the county must determine under what conditions to impose retrofitting on existing development especially areas that impact the Indian River Lagoon and areas significantly less than '/ acre in size. Some parcels recorded -ardor platted prior to 1972 are only 0.11 acres making it difficult to repair septic systems to code. —As indicated in the finance section of this element, a major portion of the cost of service expansion to existing subdivisions is funded through assessments. In the past, some residents have objected to the costs of such assessments, often citing an inability to pay. Community Development Department Indian River County 33 App33ndix A - MW Community Development Department Indian River County 33 App33ndix A Comprehensive Plan Sanitary Sewer Sub -Element instead, county must establish criteria to differentiate between areas where retrofitting is required. iandAre-as i.vherer-etro rating-is-allo Because of the cost of retrofitting projects within the urban service area is relatively eenst fit, the most appropriate criteria to use to identify areas to retrofit are increased health risks and increased groundwater and/or surface water contamination risks. When any of the following conditions exist and the YPW�DOH-Indian River verifies that the health and groundwater contamination risks cannot be sufficiently reduced by any means other than connecting to the regional system, retrofitting must occur. *--Areas with small lot sizes less than '/ acre especially those constructed prior to 1983. Where units are net eeraieeted to a r-egienal potable water system, this r-efers to lets of 'A Residential subdivisions that meet those criteria are identified in Table 3.A.3. Areas with intense land uses. Intense land uses means commercial1L industrial or equivalent uses or residential uses greater than 6 units/acre. • Environmentally Sensitive Areas. This means areas within 500 feet of aquifer recharge zones, as identified in the Aquifer Recharge Sub -Element of this plan; within 500 feet of any public water supply well; within 500 feet of the Indian River Lagoon, the St. Sebastian River, or any body of water that drains into them. • As identified in the 2017 Septic to Sewer Study: Evaluation and Ranking by Utilities. • Areas identified by the DOH -Indian River lRC14D-as potential threats to public health • New developments on oceanfront and riverfront lots For planning purposes, a history of septic irk failufesystem repairs is defined as follows: For subdivisions of 10 or fewer lots, this means 20% failures in five years. For subdivisions of 11 to 75 lots, this means 10% failures in eight -five years. For subdivisions of more than 75 lots, this means 2% failures in tet+ -five years. Residential subdivisions that meet these eriteria are i de..t:f;e.l iti Table 2 A 2 Methods that allow for a higher level of effluent treatment and reduction of contamination include: linstallation of a "performance based system", providing a 24 inch separation between the bottom of the drainfield and the wet season water table, and providing at least a 75 foot setback between septic systems and wells and/or surface waterbodies. Generally, the most effective and efficient way to correct the wastewater problem of those subdivisions is to connect them to the regional system. Other- options eould invelve adding fill end' the Community Development Department Indian River County 34 App33ndix A Comprehensive Plan Sanitary Sewer Sub -Element due to speeifie eifeumstanees, they seldem justify not eenneeting to the fegiefial system. In the neighbefhoods where individuals benefiting ffom the eapmeefien to the sanitafy sewef system TREATMENT In addition to septic tank -systems, public and private treatment plants provide wastewater treatment within the county. In Indian River County, large regional public treatment plants now predominate. Consequently, major treatment issues in the county relate primarily to ensuring sufficient capacity (either on-site or off-site) to accommodate projected growth. If wastewater demand were allowed to exceed the county's treatment capacity, untreated sewage would have to be discharged. That would result in health hazards and environmental degradation of surface water bodies. To prevent such an occurrence, the county must continue its policy of approving new development only when sufficient capacity will be available. In this regard, the county's computerized concurrency management system and its capital improvements plan ensure that capacity will be available to serve new development concurrent with demand. Public Treatment Plants Besides producing high quality effluent, all public treatment plants currently have more than enough capacity to accommodate existing demand. The following sections discuss the county's future wastewater treatment needs and alternatives to meet those needs. Projection of Future Demand Assumptions The comprehensive planning process is an opportunity for the county to complete an assessment of its long range sanitary sewer needs. Such a needs assessment must consist of an analysis that is more than a straight line linear projection. Future projections should utilize certain assumptions based on past trends, present conditions, and future desires. The main assumptions utilized in the sanitary sewer needs assessment are as follows: • The county will be the primary provider of sanitary sewer collection, treatment, and disposal; • The City of Vero Beach will continue to serve the City of Vero Beach, the Town of Indian River Shores and a portion of the unincorporated county; and Community Development Department Indian River County 35 Ap� dix A Comprehensive Plan Sanitary Sewer Sub -Element 90% to 95% of future new development will connect to the regional sewer system. The county will continue to maintain these policies and evaluate the feasibility of regional system versus package treatment plants for the above referenced type of developments. The existing conditions section of this sub -element provides a discussion of the existing capacity of centralized wastewater treatment facilities, with an emphasis on the county system. That discussion addresses the supply side of the wastewater treatment system. This section considers the demand side. The information for this section is based on the permanent and functional population projections contained in the Introductory Element and on the projected land use patterns contained in the Future Land Use Element. That information is also consistent with the county utilities master plan. To develop these projections, the county used data such as historic growth, population estimates, number and type of dwelling units, and developed commercial/industrial acreage. As with other facility analyses, planning for wastewater treatment facility expansion requires a rational approach to projecting growth over a finite planning period. Past experience has shown that using the historic growth of existing facilities in conjunction with population projections is the most accurate method of projecting wastewater generation rates for future treatment facility expansions. Capital Improvements According to the county sanitary sewer master plan, the total design capacity of the county sanitary sewer system in 2030 is projected to be 19 million gallons per day (MGD), while total demand is projected to be about 12.62 million gallons per day (MGD). To got to a 19 gallon pe day eapaeity, either- the neAh eetinty fegietial plaRt eAiWef the West F-egiena4 plant will - -, expanded in eaeh of the following years: 2010, 2015, and 2025. The iner-eases will be-. 2 nigd in 20'�i-fngd in 20153 and 3 mgd in 2025. This information is shown in the graph below. Because all of the plants in the county system are interconnected, there is flexibility as to which plant or plants will be expanded to accommodate future demand. Community Development Department Indian River County 36 Ap�Midix A Comprehensive Plan Sanitary Sewer Sub -Element Figure 3.A.2 WWTF Capacity vs. Demand ApMi WWTF Capacity vs. Demand 20.00 19.00 "0 18.00 12.65 12.85 12.62 16.00 0.62 16.00 8.00 8.85 14.00 14.00 6.00 14.00 0 12.00 g 4.9, 4.70 4.70 5.10 Overall WWTF Capacity 2 10.00 3.89 �— Demand with CorruTency —+— Demand W/O Concwenc m 8.00 V 7V 5.72 6.00 4.00 2.00 0.00 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 ApMi 12.65 12.85 12.62 0.62 11.60 j 8.00 8.85 87 c 9.60 6.00 4.9, 4.70 4.70 5.10 3.89 To ensure sufficient capacity through 2030, the county should take the following steps: • Begin planning and preliminary design for expansion when a plant's Average Daily Demand is projected to equal or exceed its capacity within 5 years; • Prepare plans and specifications for expansion when a plant's Average Daily Demand is projected to equal or exceed its capacity within 4 years; • Submit a complete construction permit application to the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) for expansion when a plant's Average Daily Demand is projected to equal or exceed its capacity within 3 years; and • Submit an application for an operation permit for the expanded facility to DEP when a plant's Average Daily Demand is projected to equal or exceed its capacity within 6 months. Taking these steps within the referenced timeframes will ensure that the county has sufficient time to design, permit, and construct needed plant capacity. At the same time, these timeframes decrease the chances that plants will have many years of unused capacity. A list of sanitary sewer capital improvements is provided in the Capital Improvements Element (CIE) of the county's comprehensive planted -provided in Appendix "A" ergo -element. Since the county's CIE must be updated annually, projects completed will be dropped from the list of capital improvements and new projects will be added as needed. Community Development Department Indian River County 37 dix A Comprehensive Plan Sanitary Sewer Sub -Element Within the county, a number of existing residential developments are not connected to the county sanitary sewer system. If all unserved developments were connected to the regional sanitary sewer system, there would be significant additional wastewater treatment demand. For a number of reasons, however, most unserved developments will never connect to the regional system. In many cases, septic systems are adequate to accommodate individual single family houses, and there is no need to retrofit existing subdivisions with sanitary sewer lines. Where subdivisions are served by a centralized potable water system, there are seldom problems caused by lots having individual septic mss e s. Given the high cost of retrofitting existing subdivisions with sanitary sewer lines and given the limited benefits of connecting, it is unlikely that many existing subdivisions will be retrofitted with sewers in the future. There are, however, some circumstances where connecting existing subdivisions to the sanitary sewer system would be beneficial. Those circumstances mostly relate to a subdivision's proximity to a waterbody. Because septic t-aakss sy tems can leach pollutants and those pollutants can impact the ocean, the Indian River Lagoon, the St. Sebastian River, or other surface water bodies, the county has an interest in promoting the connection of waterfront subdivisions to the sanitary sewer system. In the future, the county should continue to offer its assessment program that provides sanitary sewer to those neighborhoods where individuals benefiting from the connection to the sanitary sewer system pay for the cost of service expansion. Wastewater Needs and Land Use With the 1990 adoption of the comprehensive plan, the county established its urban service area. The intent of the comprehensive plan is to direct most growth into that area and to provide urban type services to development in the urban service area. Since adoption of the 1990 comprehensive plan, the regional wastewater collection system has been extended to all commercial/industrial areas in the county, including the three I-95 commercial/industrial nodes. As a result of that expansion, the development potential of land within the urban service area has greatly increased for both residential and commercial/industrial proj ects. Although the regional sanitary sewer system service area has been greatly expanded, there are still several areas such as Oslo Park, Vero Lake Estates, Paradise Park and other areas which are not yet served. In the future, the county should evaluate whether or not unserved areas should be connected to the regional sanitary sewer system. Community Development Department Indian River County 38 A-H&dix A Comprehensive Plan Private Treatment Plants Sanitary Sewer Sub -Element As indicated in the background section of this Sub -Element, the reason that the cEounty started direct provision of wastewater treatment services was due to problems at private package treatment facilities. In many cases, the problems with private plants were due to the operational aspects of the plant, rather than with the plant itself. Because of those problems and their environmental impacts, the County Utilities Department has decommissioned all but four private plants. Customers formerly served by private plants that have been decommissioned have been connected to the county system. To avoid a repeat of past problems, to ensure the financial viability of the regional system, and to discourage urban sprawl, new package treatment plants are generally prohibited within the urban service area. Consistent with the provisions of the Future Land Use Element of this plan, package treatment plants or connection to the regional system may be allowed outside of the urban service area to serve development projects that meet the following specific criteria: • clustering of residential development within agricultural areas; • clustering of residential development within privately owned upland conservation areas; • clustering development within mixed use districts; or • traditional neighborhood design communities. • agricultural businesses and industries (including biofuel facilities) In the future, the county will continue to maintain and enforce the above referenced policies. EFFLUENT DISPOSAL Another wastewater treatment issue concerns long range plans for effluent disposal. With respect to effluent disposal, the county has several alternatives. Those alternatives include requiring new commercial and/or residential development to use reuse water, retrofitting existing development to use reuse water, or creating wetlands with reuse water. While retrofitting existing development is, by a large margin, the most expensive of these options, requiring that new development accommodate reuse water is somewhat less expensive. In fact, new commercial areas are currently required to accommodate reuse lines. Even some single-family and multiple -family residential developers, although not required to, have chosen to incur the extra expense of building their projects to accommodate reuse water. Currently, reuse through spray irrigation is the county's primary effluent disposal method. This method is consistent with the county's emphasis to conserve potable water. For that reason, the eCounty t Utilities dDepartment is planning to modify the county's sanitary sewer system Community Development Department Indian River County 39 ApM idix A Comprehensive Plan I Sanitary Sewer Sub -Element connection regulations to require that all new subdivisions of 25 or more lots within one-quarter of a mile of an existing re -use line connect to the re -use line for irrigation purposes. Perhaps the most successful and efficient effluent reuse method currently used by the county is at the West County Plant. At that site, a ±165 acre man-made wetland has been created and maintained with effluent from the plant. Besides the creation of habitat for many species of plants and animals, the benefits of that method of effluent disposal include greatly decreased operating costs. Although the wetland at the West County Plant is adjacent to the plant, such man-made wetlands are not required to be located near a treatment plant. If not located near a plant, however, they must be located near a reuse water transmission line. Because the long term benefit of developing such wetlands may outweigh the initial land acquisition and construction costs, the county should begin studying the feasibility of developing additional wetlands. SUMMARY OF ANALYSIS Currently, the county's sanitary sewer system is meeting the needs of the community. There is, however, a need to expand the regional wastewater treatment system. That expansion is needed to meet the demand of projected population growth through 2030, and is currently planned to occur with incremental plant expansions. While the county's wastewater system works well, septic tanks sy tems are still an issue. In the future, the county needs to ensure that even fewer new units use septic tam .ssy tems, while also connecting existing septic tans sy tems users to the regional system where problems exist. To address the thousands of existing septic tanks sy tems, the county and Health Department need to evaluate the feasibility of establishing a mandatory septic tankl s� maintenance system. Although the county has successfully extended sewer lines within the urban service area, the county needs to continue to expand its collection system to serve the entire urban service area. Along with that, the county needs to expand its reuse system. Appendix A 338 Community Development Department Indian River County 40 Comprehensive Plan Sanitary Sewer Sub -Element GOAL, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES GOAL Indian River County shall have an efficient system of sanitary sewer disposal that prevents degradation of existing resources, promotes orderly growth and development, and meets existing and projected demands. OBJECTIVE 1 Service Concurrent with Development Through the time horizon of the plan, there will be sufficient capacity in the regional sanitary sewer system to accommodate all new development within the urban service area. POLICY 1.1: New development within the unincorporated portion of Indian River County shall be approved only when capacity is available, either on-site or off-site, to provide needed sanitary sewer service. POLICY 1.2: Th DEP, on an annual basis, shall inspect all private wastewater treatment plants in Indian River County. POLICY 1.3: The county hereby adopts a sanitary sewer level of service standard of 250 gallons per day per equivalent residential unit with a peak monthly flow factor of 1.25. That standard shall be utilized for determining the availability of facility capacity and the demand generated by a development. POLICY 1.4: Through its computerized permit tracking and its concurrency management system, the county shall continue to implement procedures to update facility demand and capacity information as development orders and permits are issued. POLICY 1.5: The Planning Division, on an as needed basis, shall provide summary reports containing capacity and demand information for each public wastewater treatment plant within the county service area. POLICY 1.6: Consistent with the county's water and wastewater connection matrix, the county shall continue to allow the use of septic tank systems in rural areas for single- family units and for domestic waste disposal by small retail establishments. The use of septic tank -systems must be approved by the Health Department and be consistent with Rule 64E-6, FAC. Appendix A 339 Community Development Department Indian River County 41 Comprehensive Plan Sanitary Sewer Sub -Element OBJECTIVE 2 Regional System Expansion/Correction of Deficiencies By 2025 241-5, at least 60-50% of all existing r -es l -units in the county's service area will be connected to the counts regional sanitary sewer system. This will be an increase from 52.7% 440A in 2017200F: POLICY 2.1: The county shall continue to offer the utility assessment program to areas with septic sen,iee-s s•gems within the County Utilities Department service area. POLICY 2.2: The county shall continue to offer up to 10 year financing for all utility assessments. POLICY 2.3: The county shall given priority for the provision of public sanitary sewer services to the subdivisions on the list of subdivisions as identified in Table 3.A.3 designated as requiring sanitary sewer service due to public health threats by DOH. POLICY 2.4: The county shall provideup blic sanitary sewer service to areas where the lack of such service is determined to be a public health threat and shall initiate sewer projects where feasible to serve subdivisions served byeptic systems and identified in Table 3.A.3.1 as posing a disproportionately high potential negative impact on Indian River Lagoon water quality. The county shall recover costs through those connecting to the system and directly benefitting from the improvement. POLICY 2.5: Consistent with its interlocal agreements with the City of Sebastian and the Town of Orchid, the county shall provide sanitary sewer services to those municipalities. POLICY 2.6: By 2018, the county shall perform a financial analysis for septic to sewer conversion projects. Based on that analysis and available funding a specific list of subdivisions to be connected to public sanitary sewer system by certain dates will be identified. Appendix A 340 Community Development Department Indian River County 42 • • -• • - - OW POLICY 2.6: By 2018, the county shall perform a financial analysis for septic to sewer conversion projects. Based on that analysis and available funding a specific list of subdivisions to be connected to public sanitary sewer system by certain dates will be identified. Appendix A 340 Community Development Department Indian River County 42 Comprehensive Plan Sanitary Sewer Sub -Element POLICY 2.7: By 2028, the county shall provide sanitary sewer service to at least five (5) subdivisions identified in Table 3.A.3.1 as posing a disproportionately high potential negative impact on Indian River Lagoon water quality. The county shall recover costs through those connecting to the system and directly benefitting from the improvement. OBJECTIVE 3 Surface Water and Groundwater Ouality Through the time horizon of the plan, the county will have no instances of sanitary sewer facilities contaminating surface water or groundwater resources. POLICY 3.1: The MG14D-DOH-Indian River shall conduct annual inspections of septic tanks -s sty ems that are associated with heavy commercial, industrial, and manufacturing or. equivalent uses. The results of these inspections may_be used to conjunction with other items in prioritizing sanitary sewer service expansion. POLICY 3.2: The county shall regularly monitor all centralized sanitary sewer facilities to ensure that they do not contaminate surface water or groundwater resources. POLICY 3.3: To ensure that hazardous waste is not discharged into ground or surface water, the DOH -Indian River shall requireeanduet ran samplings of on-site sewage systems for businesses which have been identified as hazardous waste generators suspected of illegal discharges. Violators shall be prosecuted according to federal, state and/or local regulations. OBJECTIVE 4 Water Conservation Through the time horizon of the plan, 100% of the wastewater effluent produced by the county centralized sanitary sewer facilities will be reused. POLICY 4.1: The county shall continue to reuse wastewater by spray irrigation, with percolation ponds and wetlands as back-up. POLICY 4.2: The county shall r-equir-eencourage large volume irrigation users, such as developments with golf courses, to use reuse water for spray irrigation. POLICY 4.3: The county shall continue to enforce Land Development Regulations that require developments that use treated wastewater for spray irrigation to construct and dedicate to the county the effluent transmission lines needed to transport the effluent to the development. Appendix A 341 Community Development Department Indian River County 43 Comprehensive Plan Sanitary Sewer Sub -Element POLICY 4.4: The county shall require all new subdivisions or residential projects of 25 or more lots/units within one-quarter of a mile of an existing re -use line to connect to the re -use line when capacity exists. OBJECTIVE 5 Capital Improvements By 20442022, the county will have completed the sanitary sewer improvements listed in the county's 5 year Capital Improvements Program in order to maximize the use of existing facilities and discourage urban sprawl (current Five Year Capital Improvements Plan shown in Appendi Ais in the Capital Improvements Element of the comprehensive plan). POLICY 5.1: In conformance with the review process for the Capital Improvements Element of this plan, the county shall maintain a five-year schedule of capital improvement needs for public facilities. POLICY 5.2: Proposed capital improvement projects shall be evaluated and ranked according to the following three priority level guidelines: • Level One - whether the project is needed to protect public health and safety, to fulfill the county's legal commitment to provide facilities and services, or to preserve or achieve full use of existing facilities. Level Two - whether the project increases efficiency of use of existing facilities, prevents or reduces future improvement costs, provides service to developed areas lacking full service or promotes in -fill development. Level Three - whether the project represents a logical extension of facilities and services within the urban service area. POLICY 5.3: In order to guarantee provision of more than the minimum level of service, the county shall take the following steps: begin planning and preliminary design for expansion when a plant's Average Daily Demand is projected to equal or exceed its capacity within 5 years; prepare plans and specifications for expansion when a plant's Average Daily Demand is projected to equal or exceed its capacity within 4 years; submit a complete construction permit application to the Florida Department of Environmental Protection for expansion when a plant's Average Daily Demand is projected to equal or exceed its capacity within 3 years; and Appendix A 342 Community Development Department Indian River County 44 Comprehensive Plan Sanitary Sewer Sub -Element • submit an application for an operation permit for the expanded facility to DEP when a plant's Average Daily Demand is projected to equal or exceed its capacity within 6 months. POLICY 5.4: The county shall treat sanitary sewer provision as an enterprise system which is financially self-supporting. POLICY 5.5: The County Utilities Department shall fund sanitary sewer capital improvements and expansions through user fees, impaet feescapacity charges, developer's agreements, assessments and other appropriate fees and funding mechanisms. POLICY 5.6: The county shall identify d pursue opportunities for state and federal sour-eesof funding available for the improvement and expansion of utility services including. septic to sewer conversion proiects and sewer connections. POLICY 5.7: All improvements, replacement, expansion, or increase in capacity of county facilities shall be consistent with adopted level of service standards for facilities. POLICY 5.8: Consistent with the policies of the Future Land Use Element of this plan, provision of centralized sanitary sewer service shall be limited to the following areas: • Areas within the Urban Service Area; • Areas where the county has legal commitments to provide facilities and services as of the date of adoption of this plan; • Areas outside of the Urban Service Area where at least a portion of the site is contiguous to an Urban Service Area boundary as depicted on the Official Future Land Use Map or where located no more than 500 feet from an existing sanitary sewer line that is part of the county sanitary sewer system, or where an approved place of worship or camp/retreat use existed on January 1, 2016 and is approved for water and/or sewer service by Utility Services in conjunction with a utility construction/connection permit filed with Utility Services on or before June 30, 2016. These areas are subject to the following provisions: o The maximum density of such land shall be as shown on the Future Land Use Map, and the provision of centralized sanitary sewer service shall not be justification for an increase in maximum density; and o Any and all costs associated with connecting a property to the sanitary sewer system, including costs associated with survey, design, Appendix A 343 Community Development Department Indian River County 45 Comprehensive Plan Sanitary Sewer Sub -Element permitting, line extensions, construction, pumps and lift stations, restoration, inspections, and certification, shall be borne by the owner of the property. • Development projects located outside of the Urban Service Area that meet the criteria of the policies of the Future Land Use Element for: o clustering of residential development within agricultural; o clustering of residential development within privately owned upland conservation areas; o clustered development within mixed use districts; o traditional neighborhood design communities; o public facilities such as public schools; and o agricultural businesses and industries (including biofuel facilities) • Areas where, consistent with Sanitary Sewer Sub -Element Policy 2.4, the lack of centralized sanitary sewer service is determined to be a public health threat. POLICY 5.9: The county shall install automatic air release valves in all new sewer lines. OBJECTIVE 6 Package Treatment Plants Through the time horizon of the plan, there shall be no instances of package treatment plant failures, or illegal or unsafe package treatment plant discharges. POLICY 6.1: The county shall limit the use of package wastewater treatment systems to areas that meet the following criteria governing connection to the county sanitary sewer system: • Development served by existing package treatment plants may continue to treat their sewage in that manner until centralized service becomes available. At that time, all development within '/ mile of a county sewer line shall be connected to the county system. Development whose sewage treatment systems causes a public health problem must connect to the regional system regardless of the distance to sewer lines. • Package treatment plants shall be allowed in areas of development outside of the Urban Service Area when such development meets the criteria of policies of the Future Land Use Element for: o clustering of residential development within agricultural areas; Appendix A 344 Community Development Department Indian River County 46 Comprehensive Plan Sanitary Sewer Sub -Element o clustering of residential development within privately owned upland conservation areas; o clustering development within mixed use districts; o tradition neighborhood design communities; or o agricultural businesses and industries (including biofuel facilities) POLICY 6.2: The county shall ensure that, prior to the issuance of development orders or permits, the applicant has demonstrated that the project complies with applicable federal, state, and local permit requirements for package treatment plants. POLICY 6.3: The county shall require that issuance of permits for replacement or expansion of existing package treatment plants be conditioned upon compliance with the most updated version of DEP regulatory requirements and Federal and State water quality standards as identified in the "Regulatory Framework" section of the sub -element. POLICY 6.4: To ensure proper maintenance and operation, the U44ities-pai4fnefft shall -DEP shall inspect all package treatment plants on an annual basis. POLICY 6.5: The county shall require all new package wastewater treatment plants to be built according to current federal, state, and county requirements. In addition to obtaining a county permit demonstrating compliance with county regulations, any developer building and operating a package wastewater treatment plant must obtain a state permit demonstrating compliance with state and federal regulations. Those regulations include but are not limited to the Federal Water Pollution Control Act of 1972 (PL 92-500) and its amendments through the Clean Water Acts of 1977 (PL 95-217) and 1981 (PL 97-117), Chapters 381 and 403 of the Florida Statutes, and Rules 17-3 and 17-6 of the Florida Administrative Code. Both state and county permits are required for the construction of a plant, and for any future expansion or modification of a plant. POLICY 6.6: At the time the county approves any new package treatment plants, the county will require, that at the time deemed appropriate by the county, the package treatment plant and associated sewer collection system shall be dedicated to the county for operation and maintenance without compensation. POLICY 6.7: The county shall continue to enforce ordinances requiring pre-treatment of commercial and industrial waste before discharge into the county system. POLICY 6.8: The county shall require all future connections to the regional sanitary sewer system to be consistent with the attached water and wastewater connection matrix. Appendix A 345 Community Development Department Indian River County 47 Comprehensive Plan Sanitary Sewer Sub -Element OBJECTIVE 7 Septic Tank -Systems By 2020, the number of new septic systems permitted annually will not exceed450200. POLICY 7.1: The county shall limit the use of septic systems to areas that meet the following criteria governing connection to the county sanitary sewer system: Commercial/industrial uses and residential subdivisions identified in Table 3.A.3 may continue to treat their sewage with existing septic tank systems until centralized sewer service lines are extended to within '/ mile of the site. At that time, all residential units in those subdivisions and all commercial/industrial uses shall be connected to the county system. Developments whose sewage treatment systems cause a public health problem must connect to the regional system regardless of the distance to sewer lines. Use of septic tantsystems for new development shall be prohibited unless: o such development meets the criteria set on the water and wastewater connection matrix; or o such development consists of clustered residential development within privately owned upland conservation (C-3) areas. Even under those circumstances, no individual septic tank systems may be associated with individual residential units. If located outside of any conservation designated areas or areas that are environmentally sensitive or significant, however, centralized community septic tank systems may be provided to each pod of clustered residential development. o Septic til -systems shall be allowed in areas of development outside of the Urban Service Area when such development meets the criteria of policies of the Future Land Use Element for: - clustered residential development within agricultural planned development projects; - clustered development within new town projects; - traditional neighborhood design communities; and - agricultural businesses and industries (including biofuel facilities) Appendix A 346 Community Development Department Indian River County 48 Comprehensive Plan Sanitary Sewer Sub -Element POLICY 7.2: The county shall ensure that, prior to the issuance of development orders or permits for projects to be served by septic tank systems, the applicant has demonstrated that the project complies with Florida Department of Health DOH regulations Section 381.0065 FS -and tel -Chapter 64E-6, FAC, permit requirements for septic systems. POLICY 7.3: The county in coordination with and through the DOH -Indian River, shall require that issuance of permits for r- __pair or replacement of existing septic systems be conditioned upon compliance ;W41H Oh.e. ffi-est updated version of DEP regulatory " . with DOH regulations Section 381.0065 FS and Chapter 64E-6, FAC, permit requirements for septic systems. POLICY 7.4: The county, in coordination with and through the lReGNMOH-Indian River, shall establish public education programs on the proper use, inspection requirements, maintenance, and abandonment of septic t-anksssy tems. The aseptic system tem abandonment process shall be based on current state and local regulations. POLICY 7.5: Consistent with Section 381.00651 FS and in coordination with and through the DOH -Indian River, the County shall encourage a voluntary opt—in provision for septic system maintenance and encourage contractors that provide septic maintenance to document information. POLICY 7.6: The County, in coordination with and through the DOH -Indian River, shall encourage all septic systems including repairs and modifications to meet a 24 inch separation between the bottom of the drainfield and the wet season water table and meet 75 foot setbacks from surface waterbodies and wells. Appendix A 347 Community Development Department Indian River County 49 Comprehensive Plan Sanitary Sewer Sub -Element PLAN IMPLEMENTATION An important part of any plan is its implementation. Implementation involves execution of the plan's policies. It involves taking actions and achieving results. For the Sanitary Sewer Sub -Element, implementation involves various activities. While some of these actions will be ongoing, others are activities that will be taken by certain points in time. For each policy in this element, Table 3.A.6 identifies the type of action required, the responsible entity for taking the action, the timing, and whether or not the policy necessitates a capital expenditure. To implement the Sanitary Sewer Sub -Element, several different types of actions must be taken. These include: expansion of plant capacity, extension of the collection network, enforcement of land development regulations and ordinances, execution of interlocal agreements, coordination, and preparation of studies and evaluation and monitoring reports. Overall plan implementation responsibility will rest with the planning department. Besides its responsibilities as identified in Table 3.A.6, the planning department has the additional responsibility of ensuring that other entities discharge their responsibilities. This will entail notifying other applicable departments of capital expenditures to be included in their budgets, notifying other departments and groups of actions that must be taken, and assisting other departments and agencies in their plan implementation responsibilities. Appendix A 348 Community Development Department Indian River County 50 Comprehensive Plan Sanitary Sewer Sub -Element TABLE 3.A.6 - SANITARY SEWER SUB -ELEMENT IMPLEMENTATION MATRIX POLICY# TYPE OF ACTION RESPONSIBILITY TIMING CAPITAL EXPEND. 1.1 Land Development Regulations Planning Ongoing NO 1.2 Monitoring Procedures UtilitiesDEP Ongoing NO 1.3 Land Development Regulations Planning Ongoing NO 1.4 Monitoring Procedures Utilities/Planning Ongoing NO 1.5 Summary Reports Planning As Needed NO 1.6 Land Development Regulations Utilities/DOH - INDIAN RIVER Ongoing NO 2.1 Service Provision Utilities Ongoing YES 2.2 Service Provision Utilities Ongoing NO 2.3 Evaluation Process/ Service Provision Utilities/ DDOH - INDIAN RIVER Ongoing YES 2.4 Evaluation Process/ Service Provision Utilities/DOH - INDIAN RIVER Ongoing YES 2.5 Coordination Utilities/BCC Ongoing NO 2.6 Feasibility StudySeptic to Sewer Study Utilities4PIanni g Ongoing NO 2.7 New Service to Existine Utilities Ongoing YES Subdivisions on Septic Systems 3.1 Annual Inspections IDOH - INDIAN RIVER Ongoing NO 3.2 Monitoring Procedures Utilities Ongoing NO 3.3 Monitoring Procedures EW44DDOH - INDIAN RIVER Ongoing NO 4.1 Reuse Water by Spray Irrigation Utilities Ongoing NO 4.2 Land Development Regulations Utilities Ongoing NO 4.3 Land Development Regulations Utilities Ongoing NO 4.4 Land Development Regulations Utilities Ongoing NO Appendix A 349 Community Development Department Indian River County 51 Comprehensive Plan Sanitary Sewer Sub -Element POLICY# TYPE OF ACTION RESPONSIBILITY TIMING CAPITAL EXPEND. 5.1 CIP Maintenance Finance/Utilities Ongoing NO 5.2 CIP Evaluation & Finance/Utilities Ongoing NO Prioritization 5.3 Capacity Monitoring & Utilities Ongoing YES Plant Expansion 5.4 Land Development Finance/Utilities Ongoing NO Regulations 5.5 Land Development Utilities Ongoing YES Regulations 5.6 Funding Mechanism Utilities/Finance Ongoing NO 5.7 Improvement/ Utilities Ongoing YES Replacement/Expansion 5.8 Land Development Utilities/Planning Ongoing NO Regulations 5.9 Installation of Air Utilities Ongoing Yes Release Valves 6.1 Land Development Utilities/Planning Ongoing NO Regulations 6.2 Land Development Utilities/Planning Ongoing NO Regulations 6.3 Land Development Utilities/Planning/ IDOH Ongoing NO Regulations - INDIAN RIVER 6.4 Plant Inspections U44ifie DEP Ongoing NO 6.5 Land Development Utilities/Planning Ongoing NO Regulations 6.6 Land Development Utilities/Planning Ongoing NO Regulations 6.7 Land Development Utilities Ongoing NO Regulations 6.8 Land Development Utilities/Planning Ongoing NO Regulations 7.1 Land Development Utilities/Planning Ongoing NO Regulations 7.2 Land Development Utilities/Planning/ 1DDOH Ongoing NO Regulations - INDIAN RIVER Appendix A 350 Community Development Department Indian River County 52 Comprehensive Plan Sanitary Sewer Sub -Element POLICY# TYPE OF ACTION RESPONSIBILITY TIMING CAPITAL EXPEND. 7.3 Land Development Regulations Utilities/Planning/ 4R4C44DQOH - INDIAN RIVER Ongoing NO 7.4 Public Education Program Utilities/ IRCHPDOH - INDIAN RIVER Ongoing NO 7.5 Septic Maintenance and DOH - INDIAN RIVER Onizoing,NO Reporting 7.6 Septic System Improvements DOH - INDIAN RIVER Ongoing NO Appendix A 351 Community Development Department Indian River County 53 Comprehensive Plan Sanitary Sewer Sub -Element EVALUATION AND MONITORING PROCEDURES To be effective, a plan must not only provide a means for implementation; it must also provide a mechanism for assessing the plan's effectiveness. Generally a plan's effectiveness can be judged by the degree to which the plan's objectives have been met. Since objectives are measurable and have specific timeframes, the plan's objectives are the benchmarks used as a basis to evaluate the plan. Table 3.A.7 identifies each of the objectives of the Sanitary Sewer Sub -Element. It also identifies the measures to be used to evaluate progress in achieving these objectives. Most of these measures are quantitative. Besides the measures, Table 3.A.7 also identifies timeframes associated with meeting the objectives. The utilities department staff will be responsible for monitoring and evaluating the Sanitary Sewer Sub -Element. This will involve collection of data and compilation of information regarding facility capacity, expansion, and new development permitted. This will be done on a regular basis. As part of the county's concurrency management system, the county will continually monitor facility capacity to ensure that wastewater level -of -service standards will be maintained. While monitoring will occur on a continual basis, formal evaluation of the Sanitary Sewer Sub - Element will occur every five years in conjunction with the formal evaluation and appraisal of the entire comprehensive plan. Besides assessing progress, the evaluation and appraisal process will also be used to determine whether the Sanitary Sewer Sub -Element objectives should be modified or expanded. In this way the monitoring and evaluation of the Sanitary Sewer Sub - Element will not only provide a means of determining the degree of success of the plan's implementation; it will also provide a mechanism for evaluating needed changes to the plan element. Appendix A 352 Community Development Department Indian River County 54 Comprehensive Plan Sanitary Sewer Sub -Element TABLE 3.A.7 - SANITARY SEWER SUB -ELEMENT EVALUATION MATRIX OBJECTIVE # MEASURE TIMEFRAME 1 Availability of Sufficient Capacity Through the time horizon of the plan 2 % connected to regional system By 24"2020 3 # of instances of sanitary sewer facilities contaminating surface water or groundwater resources Through the time horizon of the plan 4 % of wastewater effluent reused Through the time horizon of the plan 5 Completed improvements Through the time horizon of the plan 6 # of package treatment plant failures and # of illegal or unsafe package treatment plant discharges Through the time horizon of the plan 7 # of new septic systems permitted annually By 2020 Appendix A 353 Community Development Department Indian River County 55 Comprehensive Plan Sanitary Sewer Sub -Element TABLE 3.A.8 - WATER & WASTEWATER CONNECTION MATRIX FOR NEW DEVELOPMENT * Daily flow refers to water consumption or sewer generation. **The applicant for any development project, where such project will not connect to a centralized system, must sign a developer's agreement with the Indian River County Utilities Department to operate on a private system with a commitment to connect to the regional system when service is available. These agreements shall be conditioned upon demonstration of compliance with applicable federal, state, and local permit requirements. When using a private system or on-site facilities, the developer must construct a dry line or wet line at the time of construction, if required by the Utilities Department. The final determination for the type of Appendix A 354 Community Development Department Indian River County 56 Inside of the Urban Service Area Connect Not Connect Single Family: Within 200' of system X Outside of 200' of system X** Residential Projects: Subdivision, multi -family, site plan, PD, DRI Within '/ mile of the system 25 units or more X Less than 25 units X Outside of '/ mile of system 25 units or more X Less than 25 units X** Non -Residential Projects: Subdivision, site plan, PD, DRI Within '/ mile of system 2,000 gallons daily flow or more* X Less than 2,000 gallons daily flow* X Outside of'/ mile of system 2,000 gallons daily flow or more* X Less than 2,000 gallons daily flow* X** * Daily flow refers to water consumption or sewer generation. **The applicant for any development project, where such project will not connect to a centralized system, must sign a developer's agreement with the Indian River County Utilities Department to operate on a private system with a commitment to connect to the regional system when service is available. These agreements shall be conditioned upon demonstration of compliance with applicable federal, state, and local permit requirements. When using a private system or on-site facilities, the developer must construct a dry line or wet line at the time of construction, if required by the Utilities Department. The final determination for the type of Appendix A 354 Community Development Department Indian River County 56 Comprehensive Plan Sanitary Sewer Sub -Element non-residential establishment which can utilize a private system shall be made by the Utilities Department, Community Development Department, and DOH — Indian River. System Availability: A system is considered available when a collection or distribution line exists in a public easement or right-of-way. Distance Determination: Distance determinations are made from the nearest point of the project (area of development) to the public facility directly through public easements or public rights-of- way. FACommunity Development\Comprehensive Plan Text Amendments\2017 Sewer Policy Update\Agenda Items\PH #2 - BCC Transmittal Review\Appendix A\9 Chapter 3A Sanitary Sewer Sub -Element Working Copy - BCC Transmittal Hearing.doc Appendix A 355 Community Development Department Indian River County 57 terrace extends into and beyond the northwest corner of the county and reaches elevations of approximately 40 feet above sea level. The topography of the county is depicted in Figure 2.17. Overall, the relatively flat terrain of the county poses few constraints to development as compared to a rough or rugged terrain. The topography is also a key feature in the natural drainage system and must be examined along with other natural features to identify development opportunities and constraints. These potential opportunities and constraints are addressed in the analysis section of this element and examined in the Conservation, Coastal Mana eg ment, and Infrastructure Elements. Soils Soils can greatly influence the value or development potential of land. On farmland, those soils which are rich in nutrients provide the potential for high crop yields, while other soils require extensive fertilization and treatment. Generally, structures cannot be built on soils with poor load bearing capacity unless costly methods are employed to overcome the problem. Soils can also severely limit the use of sanitary facilities such as septie tank systems and landfills. While wet soils often cannot accommodate septic tank c systems, ground water can be polluted in highly permeable soils. Those soils with high water tables may also indicate the existence of a wetland vegetative community. In Indian River County, the United States Soil Conservation Service has identified 58 different soil types. These soils are further classified into thirteen generalized soil types and distributed among five physiographic areas of the county as follows: sand ridges; coastal islands and tidal marshes; flatwoods, low knolls and ridges; sloughs, poorly defined drainage ways and hammocks; and freshwater swamps and marshes. The generalized soil types are depicted in Figure 2.18. The suitability of soils for development is discussed in the analysis section of this element and in greater detail in the Conservation and Coastal Management Elements. Future Land Use Element 46 Appendi6 A Water transportation is provided on the Intracoastal Waterway in the Indian River Lagoon. This federally maintained water route traverses the length of the county. The nearest deepwater ports are located at Ft. Pierce to the south and Port Canaveral to the north. In Indian River County, rail service is provided by the Florida East Coast Railroad (FEC). The FEC maintains single and double tracks just west of and parallel to US 1. The nearest FEC freight yard is in Ft. Pierce. Aviation, Ports, and Rail issues are also discussed in the Transportation Element. Sanitary Sewer Generally, wastewater is a service that has traditionally been supplied by local government. In addition to the more technologically sophisticated and efficient central systems, traditional methods of wastewater treatment, including septic tankseptic systems, are still employed in Indian River County. The primary purpose of wastewater treatment is to remove solids and toxic chemicals from wastewater and render organic wastes inert. After treatment, the resulting water product is then reintroduced into the natural water cycle. Presently, there are five publicly operated regional wastewater treatment plants operating in the county. Four of those plants are operated by the Indian River County Utilities Department, while the other plant is operated by the City of Vero Beach. There are also three privately -operated package treatment plants in the county. While the county operated plants provide a level of service of 250 gallons/residential unit/day, the city operated plant provides a level of service of 197 gallons/residential unit/day. The combined design capacity of the regional plants is 13,370,000 17,350,000 gallons/day, an amount sufficient to accommodate their combined average daily demand of-g;2q44, M 8,780,000 gallons/day. Currently, the service area of the regional system includes substantial portions of the urban area of the county. As such, wastewater lines extend to much of the county's urban area, including portions of all three of the commercial/industrial nodes along I-95. In 2006, the county utilities department had,14250 28,167 sanitary sewer customers. With respect to septie 4ankseptic systems, the Department of Health in Indian River County (DOH -Indian River)-Publ ,, Het, r Health 4iit, Division f E t ' T4 , currently estimates that there are telt' more than 36,039 septic—lankseptic systems in use in Indian River County. While approximately—l-,2-7-2_L21 new septic tank c s stems were installed in 20016 in the county, that number has decreased significantly in more recent years as the level of residential construction has declined. Future Land Use Element 63 Appendix 34 Within the county, many of the older residential areas were developed with well and septic tank systems on lots which, by today's standards, are small in size. The small lot size in those areas often results in inadequate separation distances between wells and septic-taseptic systems. For that reason, some of those areas have experienced contamination of wells. To address that health problem, county policy has been to connect those areas to the regional potable water system. Because connection to the regional potable water system is usually sufficient to eliminate health risks, connection of those areas to the regional sanitary sewer system has been on a much more limited basis. Wastewater and sanitary sewer systems are addressed more fully in the Sanitary Sewer Sub - Element of the Infrastructure Element and in the Capital Improvements Element. The impact of those systems is also addressed in the Conservation Element. Potable Water Water is essential to human life and is a key ingredient in agriculture, commerce and industry. Traditionally, water in urban areas has been provided by local governments, while in rural areas individual wells or water systems have sufficed. This pattern is also present in Indian River County; however, it is not uniform in all areas of the county. In Indian River County, the water delivery system is composed of private wells and public water systems. The potable water system is discussed in greater detail in the Potable Water Sub - Element and the Capital Improvements Element. Groundwater sources are discussed in the Natural Groundwater Aquifer Recharge Sub -Element and the Conservation Element. As with the county's population distribution, water systems other than private wells are primarily limited to the developed eastern third of the county land area. Currently, there are four publicly owned regional water treatment plants operating in the county. Two of those plants are operated by the Indian River County Utilities Department, while the other plants are operated by the City of Vero Beach and the City of Fellsmere. While the county -operated plants provide a level of service of 250 gallons/residential unit/day, the Vero Beach and Fellsmere plants provide a level of service of 351 and 200 gallons/residential unit/day, respectively. The combined design capacity of those plants is 24,720,000 gallons/day, an amount sufficient to accommodate their combined average daily demand of 15,990,000 gallons/day. The plants operated by the county Utilities Department use the Floridan Aquifer as their primary water source. While the City of Vero Beach uses both the Surficial and Floridan Aquifers, the City of Fellsmere uses only the Surficial Aquifer. Because water drawn from the Floridan Aquifer contains impurities, that water must be treated to become potable. For water drawn from the Floridan Aquifer, the type of treatment used by both the city and county plants is reverse osmosis. For water drawn from the Surficial Aquifer, a lime softening treatment process is used. A by-product of the reverse osmosis process is brine; brine is water with a high concentration of impurities. That brine is then treated prior to being discharged. Future Land Use Element 64 AppendiYSg A Future Land Use Map, the 106,661 units projected at build -out represent fewer units than the maximum allowed by the Future Land Use Map. If single-family development continues to occur at densities substantially less than the maximum allowed by the by Future Land Use Map, then it can be expected that the unincorporated county's build -out potential will be reduced in the future. Currently, comprehensive plan policies direct the vast majority of residential development to land inside the urban service area. Of the projected 106,661 residential units at build -out, 96,029 units (or 90%) will be located inside the urban service area. The remaining 10,632 units will be located outside of the urban service area. Because of the recent municipal annexations and the future land use plan densities expected to be assigned to those annexed areas, the build -out potential for the total county has increased significantly. Upon build -out, it is projected that the unincorporated county and the county's municipalities will contain 188,848 residential units. At that time, the county's five municipalities will contain 82,187 residential units. Of these residential units, 49,474 residential units will be in the City of Fellsmere, while the remaining 32,713 residential units will be located in the county's other municipalities. Use Suitability of Soil Within the county, soils can limit development activity in two major ways: load bearing capacity and suitability for sanitary facilities. Those characteristics are addressed in the United States Department of Agriculture Soil Conservation Service's soil survey for Indian River County. In addition to mapping the different soils, the survey also provides an analysis of the soils. The analysis, which includes the physical, chemical, and hydric composition of each soil type, provides a basis to evaluate the soil potential for different uses. Table 2.12 is a summary of soil ratings and limitations from the Soil Survey. (Soils are also discussed in the Conservation Element). That table indicates that most soils in the county present severe limitations for site development and sanitary facilities. Usually, building limitations are due to the wetness of the soil. The wetness of the soil can result in the ponding of water, flooding and caving of excavation. The wetness also presents severe limitations to sanitary facilities and, in particular, to septic tank c systems. Since wetness and ponding lead to poor filtering and slow percolation, wet soils are unable to adequately drain. Within the county, those limitations can be reduced through the use of certain building techniques and standards. Those techniques and standards include raising the elevations of sites through the use of fill dirt and enhancing the natural drainage area of development projects. Throughout the county, septic aseptic systems are permitted by the Depai4ffien DOH -Indian River. To ensure that adequate sanitary facilities are provided for sites not connected to the county's centralized sanitary sewer system, county building regulations require the issuance of a septic permit prior to issuance of a building permit. Several standards Future Land Use Element 78 Appendix used by the DOH -Indian River to guarantee the viability of septic systems include: a minimum septic tamseptic system elevation requirement of 48" above the wet season water table; a minimum separation distance requirement between seplis lankseptic systems and potable water wells of 75 feet; and a limitation on total building square footage based on lot size and drainfield requirements. Because of the limitations associated with on-site.septic systems, the county's policy should be to expand the public sanitary system throughout the urban service area. The Sanitary Sewer Sub - Element provides additional analysis of septietankseptic system suitability in the county and the regulatory framework under which septie taftks are permitted. Table 2.12, Soil Characteristics and Suitability Soil Drainage Corrosivity Irrigation Septic Fields Dwellings Pond Steel Concrete Poorly Moderate Low to Wetness, Severe limitations — Severe limitations — Severe Drained to High High Droughty, Wetness, Percolates Wetness Limitations — Fast intake slowly Seepage Moderately Low to Low to Wetness, Severe Limitations Slight to Severe Severe Drained Moderate Moderate Droughty, — Percolates slowly, Limitations — Limitations — Fast intake Poor filtering Wetness Seepage Excessively Low Moderate Droughty, Slight — Very poor Slight Severe Drained to High Fast intake, filtration. Potential Limitations — Soil blowing for groundwater Seepage contamination Data Source: U.S.D.A. - Soil Conservation Service Figure 2.26 shows soil characteristics which present severe limitations to development. Use Suitability of Topography The topography of Indian River County is generally flat with the exception of several ridges. Due to the lack of rough or rugged terrain, topography does not present any major limitations to development. Only a few areas along the coastal ridge have slopes steep enough to constrain development. Overall, topography is one of the principal influences on the drainage system. Because much of the county consists of relatively low flatlands, many of those areas, including the highly developed eastern mainland, would be underwater for portions of the year without man-made drainage ditches and canals. There are, however, certain county areas, such as the barrier island, the sand ridges, the St. Sebastian River area, and the higher elevations in the western county, which have a topography that results in the natural runoff of stormwater. Going forward, the county's policy should be to require that stormwater runoff from new development does not negatively impact adjacent properties or receiving water bodies. Because of the county's flat terrain, stormwater management systems are necessary to direct and retain Future Land Use Element 79 Appendix36& ➢ Groundwater Recharge Areas Underlying Indian River County are two aquifers that provide county residents with all water for domestic consumption. Those aquifers are recharged or filled by the percolation of rain and surface water through soil layers into the underground reservoirs. Those areas which provide the greatest potential for recharge are classified as "Prime Recharge Areas" and are shown on Figure 2.29. While excessive development of those areas can result in changes to natural drainage patterns and reduce recharge potential, excessive use of septic tanks and hazardous materials in those areas can increase the possibility of contamination of the aquifer. For the county public water system, the public water supply source is the deep aquifer which, because of its depth, is less likely to be subject to contamination from ground sources. Recharge areas for that aquifer are located northwest of the county. Within the county, those areas which contain community wells that draw large quantities of water are especially subject to contamination or pollution. Generally, groundwater contamination can result from excessive or improper use of septic systems and other wastewater treatment facilities, the leakage of chemicals and fuels stored underground, seepage from landfills and other waste storage areas, or surface spills of hazardous materials. For each of the community wells or wellfields in the county, zones of influence have been calculated. Those zones vary in size due to the amount or volume of flow, depth of the well and the porosity of the aquifer. Within those zones, the county's policy should restrict uses that could contaminate community wells. Future Land Use Element 85 Appendix36A ➢ Summary of Use Suitability of Natural Resources Overall, the natural features of the county provide various constraints to development, many of which can be overcome through modern building and engineering techniques. In fact, one natural resource constraint that has been mitigated through engineering is drainage. With respect to drainage, large areas of the county would be underwater, if it were not for the county's extensive system of drainage canals and ditches. In some cases, modifications are relatively simple and provide minimal adverse impacts to the environment. Where only slight modification is required, areas are generally suited for most types of development. Other areas require extensive man made improvements to achieve even the lowest intensity of development. Often those improvements include the wholesale destruction of important and sensitive habitats. In those areas, development should be kept to a minimum and highly regulated to ensure the protection of natural features and resources. Figure 2.30 is a composite of the natural constraints in the county. In those areas which contain severe constraints, the county's policy should be to restrict development. A review of existing development and natural land uses reveals the following important facts: • destruction of natural areas is most evident in the eastern portion of the county, especially waterfront areas along the Indian River and on the barrier island; • continued reliance on septie—aseptic systems increases the potential for pollution of the shallow aquifer; • the use of septic tank c systems in soils which are not suited for septic tank c systems and development in areas with low elevations require large amounts of fill dirt obtained by mining; • the large amounts of runoff that result from development can lead to the need for expensive drainage improvements, pollution of natural water bodies, and localized flooding; and • development of wetlands, woodlands and other natural areas results in the destruction of natural habitat, upsetting the natural balance of the ecosystem. Wherever development occurs, the natural state of the land is altered, most of it without serious consequences. Certain areas, however, are of such a sensitive nature that their alteration can lead to serious problems for nature and humans alike. In the past, much of the land area of the county was drained and cleared for agriculture. While it is impossible to preserve all natural areas, development policies and land use regulations can and should protect sensitive areas and limit the destruction of the environment. Future Land Use Element 87 Appendix 3h permit the transfer of development rights, and promote the use of conservation easements, dedications, and public acquisition. Policy 7.4: Any development activity in areas designated as environmentally sensitive or important, as defined in policies 5.4 and 6.11 of the Conservation Element, shall require an environmental survey as part of the approval of a development order. Based upon the results of the environmental survey, development projects shall be required to provide a site design which minimizes impacts upon endangered and threatened plants and animals. Policy 7.5: The county shall review and evaluate proposed development projects to ensure that stormwater runoff from the new development will not negatively impact adjacent properties or receiving surface waterbody quality. Polio: Indian River County shall maintain and enforce regulations to protect wetlands from the negative impacts of development. These regulations address building setbacks, protection from solid and liquid wastes including pesticides and herbicides, dredging or filling of wetlands, incorporation of wetlands into a site's development scheme, and mitigation of lost or destroyed wetlands. Policy 7.7: Indian River County acknowledges the environmental importance of the prime aquifer recharge areas shown on Figure 2.29. The county shall regulate the development of these areas. Regulations include an overlay district which restricts land uses, implements special siting requirements for septic tank c systems to mitigate soil drainage characteristics, and regulates other factors which impact the recharge capability of the land. Policy 7.8: The county shall protect public water supply wells by prohibiting the placement of septic systems; stormwater retention/detention areas; wastewater treatment plant effluent discharges, including but not limited to percolation ponds, surface water discharge, spray irrigation, and drainfields; sanitary landfills, feed lots and other concentrated animal facilities; mining . and excavation activities; and the handling, production, and storage of regulated substances within wellfield cones of influence. Policy 7.9: Consistent with the Potable Water Sub -Element, the county shall continue to extend the county water system, enabling the acquisition of small public water systems, thereby reducing the number of residents using the shallow aquifer, which is subject to groundwater pollution threats. Polices 7_10: Through the use of fee simple purchase, transfer of development rights, and conservation easements, Indian River County shall coordinate with other state, federal and local agencies to identify and protect vegetative communities identified in Conservation Element policies 6.1 through 6.7. Future Land Use Element 164 Appendix 3A Policy 7.11: The county, in cooperation with the local Heal th Depaft DOH - Indian River, shall continue to regulate the siting of septic flank c systems including siting requirements to mitigate soil characteristics. OBJECTIVE 8: PROTECTION OF HISTORIC RESOURCES Through 2015, at least 95% of unincorporated Indian River County's historic properties (as identified in "Historic Properties Survey of Indian River County, Florida", prepared by Historic Property Associates, Inc., April 1989) will continue to be preserved in fair, good, or excellent condition. Policy 8.1: The county historian and, as needed, outside consultants and experts shall provide guidance and advice to the Board of County Commissioners on matters concerning historic and archaeological preservation. The county historian shall be consulted for recommendations concerning: proposed changes to county regulations protecting historic and archaeological resources; and projects which may impact historical and archaeological sites identified on the Florida Master Site File or designated as significant by the Board of County Commissioners. Policy 8.2: Indian River County shall use incentives such as transfer of development rights, tax relief, mitigation, and public acquisitions; and penalties such as fines and imprisonment, to protect and preserve historically and archaeologically important resources. The following criteria are used to determine the historical significance of a resource: • whether or not the resource is at least 50 years old; • whether or not the resource contains significant character, interest or value as part of the historical, cultural, aesthetic and architectural heritage of the county; • whether or not the resource displays historical, political, cultural, economic, or social trends of community history; • whether or not the resource displays unique and/or distinguishing characteristics of an architectural style, design period, construction method, detail, craftsmanship, or material; and • whether or not the resource is a work by a prominent architect, designer, engineer, builder or landscape architect. Policy 8.3: All public and private development or redevelopment proposals shall be reviewed for their impact upon designated historic resources. Policy 8.4: Public and private development and redevelopment activities shall cease, at least temporarily, if historic or archaeological artifacts are discovered, in order to allow for evaluation of historic significance. Future Land Use Element 165 Appendi44 A PROPOSED REVISIONS TO COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT Comprehensive Plan Coastal Management Element These counterclockwise -rotating, extreme low pressure storms can reach ten miles in height, can spread over several hundred miles in diameter, and can generate winds in excess of 74 miles per hour (MPH), the minimum wind speed necessary to be classified as a hurricane. The official hurricane season extends from June 1 st to November 30th, with 62 percent of all Florida hurricanes occurring during September and October. While extensive rainfall commonly occurs during a hurricane and may cause widespread inland flooding, the greatest danger associated with a hurricane is storm surge. Storm surge can be described as the rise in wave and tidal heights associated with a hurricane. The vulnerability of an area to storm surge is dependent upon the potential height that a storm surge can achieve along a particular coast and the distance to which the surge can penetrate inland upon making landfall. Thus, low-lying coastal topography, such as inlets, beaches and estuaries, are especially susceptible to the destructive forces of a storm surge (Hurricane Manual for Marine Interests in Indian River County). • Coastal High Hazard Area The Coastal High Hazard Area (CHHA) is defined as the area below the storm surge line of a Category 1 hurricane as established by a Sea, Lake, and Overland Surges from Hurricanes (SLOSH) computer model. The CHHA is depicted in figure 9.11. As of 2018, Indian River County has also designated the CHHA as an "Adaptation Action Area" (AAA) in accordance with Section 163.3164(1) F.S and in support of Objective 15 of this Element and its associated policies. An AAA is defined as one or more areas that experience coastal flooding due to extreme high tides and storm surge, and that are vulnerable to the related impacts of rising sea levels for the purpose of prioritizing funding for infrastructure needs and adaptation planning_ Within the CHHA, most of the land is designated for residential use, with permitted densities ranging from 3 to 10 units per acre. A substantial portion of this land is currently developed. Much of that development took place at a time when the CHHA was more narrowly defined as land on the barrier island, east of the Coastal Construction Control Line (CCCL). • Hurricane Vulnerability Zone Although many areas are subject to coastal flooding associated with the severe weather of hurricanes, other areas face imminent danger from the storms. Those areas which face severe erosion, flooding, storm surge, or other direct storm related damages from a Category III hurricane constitute the Hurricane Vulnerability Zone (HVZ). The HVZ is depicted in Figure 9.12. This zone has been identified for special planning and evacuation purposes. • Comprehensive Emergency Management Plan In accordance with Chapter 252, F.S., Indian River County has adopted a Comprehensive Emergency Management Plan (CEMP). The CEMP replaces the Peacetime Emergency Plan (PEP), the Florida Community Development Department Indian River County 17 Appendix B 365 Comprehensive Plan Coastal Management Element Line" (D.S.S.L.). Other than approved dune walkovers, minor structures or erosion control projects, construction is not allowed seaward (east) of this regulatory line. Within Indian River County, the Coastal Barrier Resource Act (CoBRA) recognizes and discourages development in two areas: an area south of Ambersand Beach on the northern portion of the barrier island; and an area in the southern portion of the barrier island near the Indian River - St. Lucie County line. Because these relatively undeveloped areas are recognized as having the greatest potential for storm damage, federal flood insurance is unavailable in these areas. Should a Category V storm event occur, much of the barrier island and particularly the areas identified by CoBRA could be completely destroyed. Even with significant measures in place to reduce potential storm damage, hurricanes Francis and Jeanne in 2004 caused wide -spread damage to structures along the beach as well as structures inland. Sea Level Rise Sea level rise (SLR) is typically defined in terms of either global (eustatic) sea level rise or relative sea level rise. Global sea level rise represents the averagege in the height of all of Earth's oceans relative to the land. Conversely, relative sea level rise refers to measured changes in sea level height at specific locations on land relative to localized variations in land elevation, including changes due to ocean rise and/or land subsidence. Global sea level rise is directly influenced by fluctuations in the mass or volume of the ocean. Fluctuations in the volume of the ocean are the result of climatological and geological forces such as thermal expansion and contraction, tectonic shift, lift/subsidence, and sedimentation, while ocean mass is affected by factors including melting or accretion rates of glaciers, snow accumulation, and global water storage and redistribution mechanisms. Based on the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Fifth Assessment Report (AR5), many of these climate related phenomena have been directly influenced by greenhouse -gas emissions increases since the pre -industrial era and other feedback mechanisms. With respect to SLR, the IPCC AR5 indicates that global average land and ocean surface temperatures will likely continue to increase and contribute to the acceleration of SLR encountered in the future. In Florida, baseline relative sea level measurements can be derived from historical tide gauge records of mean monthly sea level. In fact, average monthly sea level measurements have been recorded at tide stations located in Key West, Cedar Key, and Fernandina Beach for more than a century. The yearly averages of these historic data, depicted in Figure 9.14, indicate a gradual trend of rising mean sea level between 1897 and 2017. Moreover, these data highlight regional variability that may be observed among local relative sea level datasets. Based on those data sets, sea levels at Key West, Cedar Key, and Fernandina Beach rose approximately 12.72", 12.66", and 15.63" over the last 100 years. Community Development Department Indian River County366 Appendix B Comprehensive Plan Coastal Management Element Annual mean sea level recorded at Key West, Cedar Key, and Fernandina Beach between 1897 and 2017 4.00 3.50 a ru 3.00 d 2SQ Ln 11111 2.06 1.50-'''r1/ti 1.Q0 0.50 Q 0.00 r Key West Cedar Key Femandina Beach lure 9.14: Annual mean sea level recorded at Key West, Cedar Key, and Fernandina Beach between 1897 and 2017. Data obtained from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration National Ocean Service. Regional mapping and vulnerability assessment studies related to sea -level rise (SLR) were initially developed by federal, state, and local government agencies in the early 2000s. Circa 2009, development of consistent regional climate change adaptation strategies became the basis for formation of the Southeast Florida Regional Climate Change Compact.(SFR000), which was represented by four coastal counties, Monroe, Miami -Dade, Broward, and Palm -Beach. The SFRCCC created a Unified Sea Level Rise Projection for Southeast Florida in 2011 based on U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Engineering Circulars guidance documents, historical tidal data from Key West (1913-1999), and available scientic literature on the subject at the time. This Unified SLR Projection was later revised in 2015 based on updated guidance documents from USACE, NOAA. and the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (1PCC) (Figure 9.15). According to the revised projection the region may experience between 14 and 34 inches of sea level rise (above 1992 mean sea level) b,, 2060. Community Development Department Indian River County3f Appendix B Comprehensive Plan Coastal Management Element 80 .Unified Sea Level Rise Projection - } (Southeast Florida Regional Climate Change Compact, 2015) 70 J LL IPCC AR5 = t1SACE High NOAA High 3 60 Year Median (inches) (inches) + @ (inches) Y y t0 G so 2030 6 10 , 12 i 40 2060 14 26 34 > 2100 31 61 81 26•+ Ln r' N � > c 20 ! _ 10 1 - - - VSaCC fRl.�t ifOAA Ytr rwdtate law 0 1992 2000 2010 2020 2030 2040 2050 2060 2070 2080 2090 2100 Year Figure 9.15: SFRCCC Unified Sea Level Rise Projection (2015). Source: Southeast Florida Regional Climate Change Compact Sea Level Rise Work Grout) (Compact). October 2015. Unified Sea Level Rise Projection for Southeast Florida._A document prepared for the Southeast Florida Regional Climate Change Compact Steering Committee. 35 p. Concurrently. the National Oceanoeraphic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Coastal Services Center began development of the web -based SLR and Coastal Floodin Impacts Viewer to aid visualization and adaptation planning efforts for various SLR scenarios. Pilot studies initially focused on specific geographic areas along the coasts of Delaware, Mississippi, and Alabama; however, the viewer (now called the Sea Level Rise Viewer) has been regularly_ updated to include a broad range of coastal areas, including nearly all of Indian River County east of Interstate 95 (I-95). For informational purposes, Indian River Countv was included in a similar SLR vulnerabili assessment in 2012 that was coordinated by the Seven50 initiative and the Southeast Florida Regional Partnership, which incorporated methodologies developed by the SFRCCC. The assessment, whose results were presented in the 2013 report "Analysis of the Vulnerability to Sea Level Rise of the Northern SE FL Counties in the Seven50 Planning Region" (Appendix A). evaluated three SLR inundation scenarios (e.g. 1, 2, and 3 feet of inundation) and characterized local geographic areas at potential flood risk due to potential SLR. Baseline land elevation measurements, upon which the one foot, two foot, and three foot inundation levels were mapped. were derived from Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR) vertical elevation data that were obtained from the NOAA Coastal Services Center. These data were orieinally collected in 2007 for the Florida Department of Emergency Management (FDEM). SLR inundation maps depicted flood risks based on two levels of confidence. 80-100%certainty and 20-79.9% certainty, and were categorized as either "more likely" to be inundated or "possibly inundated, respectively. The local maps presented in the 2013 Seven50 report, provided a clear visual comparison of the magnitude of flood -related impacts that may be encountered in Indian River County under 1, 2, and 3 -ft SLR inundation scenarios. Community Development Department Indian River CountYM8 Appendix B Comprehensive Plan Coastal Management Element Moreover, other data comparisons were evaluated in the analysis including taxable property value ranges impacted based on inundation level, degree of impacts to higher and lower functional classification roads, and total acres impacted based on future land use designation. Those baseline data provided critical insights for implementation of long range adaptation planningst� ies. ANALYSIS Land Use This analysis section addresses issues, problems, and opportunities within the coastal zone. A complete analysis of land use data, including a comparison of land use acreages by classification, is contained in the Future Land Use Element of the Comprehensive Plan. In the past, comprehensive plan policies, including the Future Land Use Map, have successfully directed new residential and nonresidential development to designated areas of the county. Consequently, there have been few amendments to the land use map and only minor adjustments to the county's Urban Service Area boundary since the county's current comprehensive plan was adopted in 1990. In fact, the only significant changes to the Future Land Use Map in the previous decade have been amendments designating publicly acquired environmental lands for conservation. Going forward, the major land use issues facing Indian River County in the coastal zone and in the county overall are urban sprawl, rural sprawl, agricultural preservation, and conservation of natural systems within the context of development. Economy Generally, the county's economy is limited in diversity and largely reliant on service oriented industries. Despite this current lack of economic diversity, Indian River County has attractive qualities that certain businesses look for. These qualities, which include an available development - ready supply of land and an exceptional quality of life (warm weather, beaches, minimal population density, resource-based recreational opportunities, etc.), will aid the county as it seeks to increase its economic base in the future. • Eco Tourism A significant aspect of the County's quality of life is its natural resources, not the least of which is the Indian River Lagoon. Resources such as the lagoon provide significant economic benefits to the county. According to the Indian River Lagoon Economic Assessment and Analysis Update (2007), the total economic impact in 2007 of visitors to the Indian River Lagoon in Indian River County was over $110 million. Because of its natural assets, as well as cultural heritage, Indian River County has an opportunity to capitalize on ecotourism. From an economic development standpoint, the County, through its County Environmental Lands Program, is actively preserving some of its greatest natural assets and Community Development Department Indian River County369 Appendix 6 Comprehensive Plan Coastal Management Element Indian River Lagoon, the St. Sebastian River, or other surface water bodies, the County's policy should be to promote the connection of waterfront subdivisions to the sanitary sewer system. A complete analysis of sanitary sewer is provided in the Sanitary Sewer Sub -Element. • Stormwater Management Since 1990, stormwater management facilities in the county have been designed to handle a 25 year/24 hour storm event, as well as to provide treatment before discharging stormwater runoff. Because many sections of the county were developed prior to 1990, the level of service for stormwater management facilities continues to vary throughout the county. Over the past several years, the county has made progress in reducing flood hazards by constructing stormwater management projects in certain areas of the county with known flooding problems, including Vero Lake Estates, east Gifford and the Rockridge Subdivision. Moreover, projects such as the Sebastian Stormwater Park and the North Relief Canal Pollution Control Facility, described previously in this report, contribute to improved stormwater quality. Despite implementation of these projects, the county needs to continue to identify, seek funding, and construct new stormwater improvement projects in areas where needed. A more complete analysis of the County's stormwater management facilities is contained in the Stormwater Management Sub -Element. Sea Level Rise Since the completion of the SLR vulnerability assessment in 2012 that was described in the .Existing Conditions section, Senate Bill 1094 was enacted, modifying Florida Statute section 163.3178(2)(f) to require, amongother ther provisions, that local governments in Florida "include development and redevelopment principles, strategies, and engineering solutions that reduce the flood risk in coastal areas which results from high -tide events, storm surge, flash floods, stormwater runoff, and the related impacts of sea -level rise" within the coastal management elements of their comprehensive plans. In accordance with this legislation, and based on the best available data from the NOAA Coastal Service Center sea level projection models and best available local projected inundation data, County SLR inundation maps have been incorporated into this Coastal Management Element for planning purposes (.Figures 9.16, 9.17, and 9.18). Community Development Department Indian River County3U Appendix B Comprehensive Plan Coastal Manaeement Element BREVARD COUNT 1� 1 /r 0 tA l ►.HCP? ` I �. , r � Jr - -71- P,i- SEBASTIAN + , _ joil r 86TH ST ' 610 \ORCHID i Indian River County Sea Level Rise Inundation, 1 ft - More Likely Possible Source of SLR Inundation Data: NOAA Coastal Services Center, Charleston, SC, 2012. INDIAN RIVER w SHORES I; — 53RO ST a -; -41STST \ �I VERO BEACH y 1. 60 20TH ST .✓LJ�_ o �`�-.,. tl- 4TH -ST. 1 . •, 9TH ST SW 0 0 1 2 3 �� 6 Miles LUCIE'COUNTY IRC Environmental Planning 12/18/2017 ST. ' Figure 9.16: 1 -Foot Sea Level Rise Scenario in Indian River County, FL Community Development Department Indian River County3T11 Appendix B Comprehensive Plan Coastal Manaeement Element BREVARD COUNT h ' a40 � �, t •� SEBASTIAN ORCHID 85TH ST t , s10 '•� Indian River County Sea Level Rise Inundation, 2 ft - More Likely Possible Source of SLR Inundation Data: NOAA Coastal Services Center, Charleston, SC. 2012. 4 69TH ST_ 3 INDIAN RIVER 4l SHORES Lhi 53RD ST a a j ¢ 41 ST STco VERO: \ BEACH V ALJ 1 _ _ 20TH ST 4TH ST \' 0 } i t co 9TH ST SW a 1 e s 0 1 2 3 Miles a IRC Environmental Planning 1 211 812 01 7 ST' L U C I E'C O U N T Y �} Figure 9.17: 2 -Foot Sea Level Rise Scenario in Indian River County, FL Community Development Department Indian River County3M Appendix B Comprehensive Plan Coastal Manaeement Element BREVARD COUNT /SEBASTIAN ORCHID _ � � fir•, t 85TH ST Indian River County Sea Level Rise Inundation, 3 ft - More Likely Possible Source of SLR Inundation Data: NOAA Coastal Services Center, Charleston, SC, 2012. 69TH ST INDIAN RIVER i "1111 SHORES 53RD ST e '41ST ST =i x '0, err' F \ " BECH:��1 O 20TH ST 7 w 4TH ST, j .0, 9TH ST SW • 0 1 2 3 B Miles IRC Environmental Planning 12/18/2017 S Tr LUCIE y COUNTY rf Figure 9.18: 3 -Foot Sea Level Rise Scenario in Indian River County, FL Community Development Department Indian River County3U Appendix B Comprehensive Plan Coastal Management Element Table 9.4: Revised Sea Level Rise Inundation Estimates for Indian River County Florida* Probability 1ft Inundation 2ft Inundation 3ft Inundation Category Area (in Sq., Area (in Sq. Area (in Sq. Miles) Miles) Miles Possible 5.95 6.95 6.05 More Likel0.90 2.84 6.54 Probability Category Acres Acres Acres Possible 3,809.97 4,447.07 3,871.39 More Likely 575.53 1,814.65 4,187.81 *Source: NOAA Coastal Services Center, Charleston, S.C., 2012, and Indian River County Environmental Planning, 2017. Note: Theeg ographic areas within the probability categories "Possible" and "More Likely" do not overlap. Inundation Risk by Land Use The total land use area at risk from each SLR inundation scenario was analyzed. When evaluated based on total acres inundated, the data indicate that under all three inundation scenarios the greates impacts of SLR are on lands designated Conservation and Recreation. Notably, privately owned estuarine wetlands and undeveloped lagoon island conservation areas appear to be the most vulnerable to SLR inundation impacts. It is estimated that more than 85% of currently existing coastal wetlands are at risk of inundation under the 3 foot sea level rise scenario. Physical infrastructure such as roadways,power plants, ports and airports, landfills, hospitals and schools were determined to be critical facilities that were initially evaluated in the 2013 Seven50 report. Based on the best available data from the NOAA Coastal Service Center sea level projection models, risks to physical infrastructure at the one, two and three foot scenarios are described below. • Indian River County has 4 airports east of I-95. No impacts were reported. • FPL has seven parcels under the cattery of Electrical Power Substation. The City of Vero Beach has nine. No impacts were reported. • FEC Railroad rights of way were assessed but did not show a vulnerabili , to sea level rise (no miles of track impacted). • The water and wastewater treatment plant analysis included the Indian River Wastewater and Water Treatment facilities. Significant impacts may be encountered at facilities located along the Indian River Lagoon which incorporate coastal mosquito impoundments and estuarine marshes. • Indian River County has 2 parcels under the data category of landfills. No impacts were reported. Community Development Department Indian River County3TA Appendix Comprehensive Plan Coastal Manaeement Element Hospital facilities are mainly concentrated in Vero Beach. Under the 2 and 3 foot scenarios approximately 6.8 and 16.5 acres of inundation, respectively, could be possible on the Indian River Medical Center parcel'. Impacts were to undeveloped portions of the parcel and no building infrastructure would be affected. 0 The Indian River County Schools include five charter schools, eight public schools, 11 private schools and Indian River Community College. Fourteen total schools are designated as storm shelters. None of these were impacted at any scenario. • Evacuation Routes to and from the barrier islands were not shown to be vulnerable to sea level rise at the three scenarios tested. 'Note: the currently undeveloped and unelevated east end of the overall IRMC parcel could be impacted under the scenarios tested. Mitigation and adaptation strategies Based on the analysis provided in this element, the majority of the inundation impacts are projected to occur within the Coastal High Hazard Area (CHHA); consequently, mitigation strategies that will likely have the greatest effect on reducing exposure to inundation risk due to one foot, two foot and three foot SLR scenarios involve reducing the potential population and vulnerable development within the CHHA. Therefore, the CHHA area should be used as an "Adaptation Action Area" (AAA) to implement strategies that address sea level rise impacts. Strategies that accomplish these objectives include reducing_ public infrastructure expenditures in at risk areas identified on the inundation maps, preventing or capping the number of assisted living facilities and similar special needs populations and higher density developments within the CHHA/AAA, and acquiring conservation and open space lands in the CHHA/AAA when feasible. Future adaptation strategiesy include relocation and/or elevation of critical infrastructure facilities and roadways where appropriate, incorporation of living shorelines that provide coastal resilience and carbon sequestration benefits, and improvements to stormwater conveyance systems that may be susceptible to failure as a result of rising groundwater and tide levels. Additionally, saltwater intrusion will be arig concern based on the cumulative effects of projected potential SLR inundation and rising groundwater levels. Community Development Department Indian River County3476 Appendix B Comprehensive Plan Coastal Management Element Policy 13.2: The county, in cooperation with the FWC, USFWS, FIND, and the ELC, will distribute manatee awareness and boating safety materials to local boaters at the time of yearly boat registration and other appropriate locations such as marinas, bait and tackle shops, and public parks. Polio: By 2010, the county shall initiate a monofilament line recycling program by placing marked collection receptacles at boat ramps, marinas, bridges, and strategic locations. Policy 13.4: All existing and new boat facilities (public and private) shall be required to post manatee awareness signs. Polio: By 2010, all rental vessels, including personal watercraft, in Indian River County shall be required to display stickers or plasticized cards with boating safety and manatee protection information. OBJECTIVE 14 Manatee Protection Measures Through 2015, the annual number of manatee mortalities in Indian River County shall be no more than five (5), excluding unusual events such as red tide or disease outbreaks. Of these annual mortalities, no more than one (1) mortality shall be watercraft -related. Policy 14.1: The county, in cooperation with the City of Vero Beach Utilities Department and the FWC Bureau of Protected Species Management will ensure that disruptions to outflow, and/or inadequate temperatures to sustain manatees during winter are minimized, and that all necessary precautions to minimize hazards at the power plant are initiated. Policy 14_2: The county shall continue to assist the Indian River Mosquito Control District to identify and retrofit any remaining culverts or pipes that pose a threat of manatee entrapment. OBJECTIVE 15 Sea Level Rise Adaptation Strategies Through 2060, the County shall adopt, implement, and pursue strategies that increase community resiliency and protect property, infrastructure, and cultural and natural resources from the impacts of sea level rise. Policy 15.1: By 2022, Public properties and infrastructure, including but not limited to water and wastewater facilities, stormwater systems, roads, bridges,governmental buildings, hospitals, coastal wetlands, transit infrastructure and other public assets that may be at risk to sea level rise impacts shall be identified. Based on risk inventory findings resiliency improvements and relocation of infrastructure shall be considered as part of capital improvement plans, where warranted. Policy 15.2: During major evaluations and overall updates to the comprehensive plan the best available data and sea level rise projections such as those made by the United States Army Corps of Engineers, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Association, and the Southeast Florida Community Development Department Indian River County37� Appendix B Comprehensive Plan Coastal Management Element Regional Climate Change Compact, shall be taken into consideration when evaluating or updating policies related to sea level rise. Policy 15.3: Beginning in 2022, and every 5 years thereafter, the County shall review the best available data on local sea level rise projections and County sea level rise inundation maps and shall update inundation maps and related analysis, as warranted. Policy 15.4: The County shall coordinate with local municipalities regarding sea level rise adaptation and mitigation measures. Policy 15.5: The County herebypts the Coastal High Hazard Area (CHHA) as an "Adaptation Action Area" (AAA) as defined in this Coastal Management Element to identify the geographic areas most vulnerable to the impacts of projected potential sea level rise and most appropriate for mitigation measures and resiliency improvements. Furthermore, the County shall apply this Element's Objective 5 CHHA policies to limit public infrastructure expenditures within the AAA. Policy 15.6: By 2023, the County shall re-evaluate flood zone requirements and mitigation strategies within the AAA. Policy 15.7: The County shall prohibit location within the AAA of new adult congregate living facilities, nursing homes, and other similar facilities that serve special needs populations. Policy 15.8: No increase in land use designation density shall be approved by the County for properties that lie within the AAA. PLAN IMPLEMENTATION An important part of any plan is its implementation. Implementation involves execution of the plan's policies by taking actions and achieving results. For the Coastal Management Element, implementation involves various activities. While some of these actions will be ongoing, others are activities that will be taken by certain points in time. For each policy in this element, Table 9.4 identifies the type of action required, the entity or entities responsible for taking the action, the timing, and whether or not the policy necessitates a capital expenditure. To implement the Coastal Management Element, several types of action must be taken. These include, but are not limited to: coordination with jurisdictional and reviewing agencies, establishing marina facilities siting criteria, and protecting/preserving estuarine resources. Overall plan implementation responsibility will rest with the Community Development Department. Besides its responsibilities as identified in Table 9.4, the Community Development Department has the additional responsibility of ensuring that other entities discharge their responsibilities. This will entail notifying other applicable departments of capital expenditures to be included in their budgets, Community Development Department Indian River County3U67 Appendix B PROPOSED REVISION TO FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT POLICY 17.5 OBJECTIVE 17: COASTAL POPULATION Through 2030, the county will have no increase in land use designation density or intensity within the Coastal High Hazard Area. Policy 17.1: The county shall not approve plan amendments that increase the residential density or land use intensity within the Coastal High Hazard Area. Policy 17.2: The county shall support programs of land acquisition on the barrier island for natural resource preservation, recreation or both. Policy 17.3: The county shall limit densities in the coastal high hazard area to ensure timely evacuation of the barrier island. Polio: The county shall prohibit new development of adult congregate living facilities, nursing homes, homes for the aged, total care facilities, and similar developments within the Coastal High Hazard Area. Policy 17.5: The county hereby adopts the Coastal High Hazard Area boundary depicted on the county's Future Land Use Map. As set forth in Coastal Management Element Policy 15.5, the Coastal High Hazard Area is designated as an Adaptation Action Area (AAA) as defined in the Coastal Management Element, subject to the policies of this Objective 17 and of Coastal Maria eg ment Element Objective 15 which include density and land use restrictions. Appendix B C:\Users\roland\Desktop\FLUE Policy 17.5 sea level rise revision - Attach 5.docx 378 Treasure Coast Newspapers I TCPALm Indian River Press Journal 1801 U.S. 1, Vero Beach, FL 32960 AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF INDIAN RIVER Before the undersigned authority personally appeared, Natalie Zoilar, who on oath says that she is Classified Inside Sales Manager of the Indian River Press Journal, a daily newspaper published at Vero Beach in Indian River County, Florida: that the attached copy of advertisement was published In the Indian River Press Journal in the following issues below. Affiant further says that the said Indian River Press Journal is a newspaper published in Vero Beach in said Indian River County, Florida, and that said newspaper has heretofore been continuously published in said Indian River County, Florida, daily and distributed in Indian River County, Florida, for a period of one year next preceding the first publication of the attached copy of advertisement; and affiant further says that she has neither paid or promised any person, firm or corporation any discount, rebate, commission or refund for the purpose of securing this advertisement for publication in the said newspaper. The Indian River Press Journal has been entered as Periodical Matter at the Post Offices In Vero Beach, Indian River County, Florida and has been for a period of one year next preceding the first publication of the attached copy of advertisement. Customer Ad Number Cooviine PO # 463755 - INDIAN RIVER COUNTY PLANNING/CDD 1926679 SANITARY SEWER MARCH 4 Pub Dates March 4, 2018 Sworn to and subscribed before me this day of, March 05, 2018, by who is Natalie Zoll r (X) personally known to me or ( ) who has produced as identification. — � andI � q 4��i�en Karol Kangas Notary Public /0- A. i -- Vq, M-/ ,n+ KARDLEKANGAS 3, .�'; NotaryPubllc-SMeofFlorkla Comsion t GG 12WI mis 10 ' '.Tmn My CORM ExplresAd29,2021 BmAdlMaghNatlonelnplpyAws /0- A. i -- Vq, M-/ 14A 1 SUNDAY, MARCH 4. 2018 1 TREASURE COAST NEWSPAPERS nc Kentucky's `child bride' bill stalls as groups fight to let 13 -year-olds wed Deborah Yetter (adr+nat ,k, Jwarut usA raWY Nlrwas x FRANKFORT, Ky. - A bill to make IS the legal age for marriage in Kentucky has stalled in a Senate committee amid concerns about the rights of parents to altowchiidren towed at a younger age, accord- ing to several lawmak- era• Known as the 'child bride- bill, Senate Rill 48 was pulled off the agenda just hours be- fore a scheduled vote by the Senate Judiciary Committee for the sec- ond time In two weeks. "SO disappointed! My SB 48 (0utiaw child marriage) wont be called for n vote," spon- sor Julie Roque Adams, a Louisville Republi- can, said In a Tweet early Thursday. 'It is disgusting that lobby- ing organizations would embrace kids marrying adults. We sce evidence or parents who are addicted, abu- sive, neglectful push- ing thelr children into Predatory arms. AD - palling'' Eileen Recktenwald, the executive director of the KentuckyAa Sexual socl- often of Sual Assault Programs, was more outspoken. `This Is legalized rape of children," she said. -We cannot allow that to Continue In Ken- Iucky, and I cannot be- Ileve we are even de- bating this Is the year 2018 in the United States. - The bill's supporters have said underage marriages most often Involve a teenage girl marrying an older man and may have involved sexual exploitation of the gill. Adams, in an Inter- view, declined to say who '"lobbying against the bill other than to say It Involved people concerned about parents' rights. But she said she hopes the bill can be revised to meet concerns of at' - Parents and still have an impact on underage marriage In Kentucky. Donna Pollard, a Louisville woman who said she was married at 16 to an older man who began sexuallyabusing her when she was 14, has advocated for the bili, She told Courier Journal that opponents include the Kentucky Family Foundation, e Lexington -based con- servative group that lobbies lawmakers on social issues. Family Foundation Executive Director Kent Ostran- der did not respond to requests for comment. Courier Journalre- ported that the bill met with favorable com- ments from members of the Senate at an ini- tial hearing Feb. 15. Lawmaker. did not vote that day, but Chat—an.Whitney Westerfiel, a Hopkins- vllie Republican, said he thought It likely the bill could pass at a fu- ture meeting. Pollard testified in support of tha bill along with a representative of the Arlington, Vir- ginta-based Tahirth Justice Center, o wom- en's advocacy argent- zallon seeking to end child marriages In the United States, Donna Pollard was monied at 161n Kentucky after meeting a man who urea her counselor at a juvenile behavior facility. New 34 and divorced, Pollard is helping draft a bill that would raise the age of marriage In Kentucky to 18. N ST0NEAo A5vaLE aorrm..000WaI Robert Farruggio LICENSED CONTRACTOR SPECIALIZING IN DRYWALL REPAIRS - RENOVATIONS POPCORN REMOVAL TEXTURING a 589-8171 or 713-0285 BEFORE THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS INDIAN RIVER COUNTY FLORIDA NOTICE OF COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TEXT AMENDMENT TRANSMITTAL, PUBLIC HEARING '.. The Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida, w81 consider transmittal of an amendment to the text of the comprehensive plan to state and regional review agencies. A public hearing, at which parties in interest and citizens shall have an opportunity to be heard, will be held on Tuesday, March 20, 2018, at 9:00 a.m, in the County Commission Chambers of County Administration Building A, located at 1801 27th Street, Vero Beach, Florida. The proposed amendment is Included in a proposed ordinance entitled: AN ORDINANCE OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AMENDING THE TEXT OF THE SANITARY SEWER SUB -ELEMENT FOR SEPTIC TO SEWER CONVERSION AND THE ASSOCIATED TEXT OF THE FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT; AND AMENDING THE TEXT OF THE COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT FOR SEA LEVEL RISE AND ASSOCIATED TEXT OF THE FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT OF THE COUNTY'S COMPREHENSIVE PLAN; AND PROVIDING CODIFICATION, SEVERABILITY, AND EFFECTIVE DATE. (Legislative) ALTHOUGH A VOTE ON WHETHER TO TRANSMIT THE AMENDMENT To THE STATE AND REGIONAL REVIEW AGENCIES WILL BE TAKEN, NO FINAL ACTION ADOPTING THE PROPOSED AMENDMENT WILL BE TAKEN AT THIS MEETING, The plan amendment application may be inspected by the public at the Community Development Department In County Administration Building A, located at 1801 271h Street, Vero Beach, Florida, between the hours of 8:30 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. on weekdays. For more information, contact Long Range Planning Section at (772)226.1243. Anyone who may wish to appeal any decision which may be made at this meeting will need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings, is made, which Includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is based. Anyone who needs a special accommodation for this meeting must contact the couny's Americans with Disabilities Act Coordinator at (772) 226.1223, at feast 48 hours in advance of the meeting. Indian River County Board of County Commissioners . � By, -s- Peter D. O'Bryan, ChaIa mn ( Personalized Investment ' Advice ' Stock - Bonds % Mutual Funds - CD's M4m and "�1dolYay a•drm4efa"es¢a lma ma; IRA's - Life Insurance Bob Anderson, WMS T'resident/Financiai Advisor G 772-978-0404 ANDERSON WEALTH MANAGEMENT Serving Indian River 1515 Indian River Blvd, Suite A243 veto Beach, n, 32960 County since 1998 s,e,sw.ramrm,nsns+s"r >Knas.+�. ucxa,nz,sm wiviv.AndersanWM.com IF M gis of Tie Beatles... 9464" The TribU,... I adlines IiYE! Fro 1/ero Beach "1964" The Tribute Focuses 1' an I a quirlessenticl moment in k4t., when lyr. r !hT Beatles pja ed before a LVE auience F. ove'39 yeors, "1964a fh'rilled :\ audiences with what is considered fa be the..mort f `il - authe`ntic and endearing tribute'tothTtBeatles, '�' __ '4•''- I THE EMERSON-CE.iiNTERR • 1590 2y�•7R1H AVE,R1V��ERO BEACH PRESENTING SPONSORTCih—dy O'Dare fRO�F' SHOW.SPONSORSrThe'Audfaho se ilLsif+ It GHOHomes? Rennick:Reo) Estate r.'''"lso5-1e.tyii6 and Indion River Land Trust alb BUY TIGICET.S NOW. ,! Visit MUsiCWOrk5COnCerts,Corn or call (800} 595 4$49 BACK TO THEIR FAMILIES" "BACK TO THEIR LIVES" Glondchildren Are Grandparents Link To Future.... and Grandparents are Grandchildren's link to the past. "Enhance the link, i did" - Jim Cestro Our selection: SIEMENS - STARKEY PHONAK - OTICON RESOUND - REXTON UNITRON - WIDEX Get a second opinion. Audiologists arc net hoard certified In hearing aid science. 1" Save on Starkey arkey Is the senforshter company at Audiber" DON'T FALL FOR BUY ONE GET ONE FREE! NEW TECHNOLOGY1 CUSTOM MADE FORMOU ONE SIZE FITS ALL Phowk•Sbrkey-Raaund•Otknn-Mich Sienens Oily) -Ranan(hka) SAME PRICE.— MadolhAmalbar I Mode in ShOuDora ■ ■ atGatr^ I �` _�• FREE� �f ChpiC4 ChO1C@ fA1 RIE IN ER Indian River Hearing Center 11. Call .61rl772-97SASRo 2110 Ssh Are, Yem fleaeh flan erSt6>rfk atik,ea4a m.tl,aidc ei a4lsss,at _ 1 /'t M4m and "�1dolYay a•drm4efa"es¢a lma ma; OPEN: Mull-Tlvrx 9am-3pm" Fd gam -fpm uvaraam,wa ncanir o-r�rc�mu e -pg. 3 r16 -; /o. A e, Jason Brown From: Stan Boling Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2018 8:52 AM To: Jason Brown Cc: Dori Roy; Dylan Reingold Subject: FW: Comp Plan Changes for Septic To Sewer Importance: High FYI ........ Sta n From: Bill Schutt Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2018 8:43 AM To: Stan Boling; Sasan Rohani; Vincent Burke; Arjuna Weragoda; Dunn, Cheryl L Subject: FW: Comp Plan Changes for Septic To Sewer Importance: High See below From: Judy Orcutt [mailto:iiorcutt@bellsouth.net] Sent: Monday, March 19, 2018 5:57 PM To: Peter D. O'Bryan <pobryan@ircgov.com>; Bob Solari <bsolari@ircgov.com>; Tim Zorc <tzorc@ircgov.com>; Joseph E. Flescher <jflescher@ircgov.com>; Susan Adams <sadams@ircgov.com> Cc: Vincent Burke <vburke@ircgov.com>; Cheryl Dunn <cheryl.dunn@flhealth.gov>; Bill Schutt <bschutt@ircgov.com> Subject: Comp Plan Changes for Septic To Sewer Commissioners, I would like to applaud the Commission and Staff for their efforts to address the issue of septic to sewer conversion in older areas of the county. The staff has approached the issue with care, and have been objective while prioritizing the neighborhoods to be served by municipal sewer. Having a plan is the first step to reduce the groundwater pollution caused by all of these legacy septic systems. I am concerned that there could be additional changes to the Comp Plan that would reduce the groundwater pollution even further. • There are approximately 500 properties, spread evenly throughout the county, where sewage lines are already in the ground and yet those properties are not connected. Considering the cost to build the infrastructure to connect 500 properties, it seems logical to address those 500 properties since it is probable that under state law, with notification, they would be required to connect within 1 year. We know from the study completed in 2015 by the Department Health (chart attached below), that the legacy septic systems provide 0% denitrification. Legacy systems were installed prior to 1983, are only required to have 6 inch separation from the drainfield to the groundwater and a 50 foot setback from surface water. IRC had an example of a study completed on a legacy neighborhood along the south relief canal where it was determined that ammonia was entering the groundwater, indicating no denitrification at all. According to the state law, the Health Department can only require these systems to repair to the 1983 standards. The County could implement a stricter regulation requiring these systems be repaired to a more modern standard. It is interesting that state law has improved other building standards (hurricane resistance) but because water pollution is out of sight - it is out of mind. "Pg. 97B 3 • It is unreasonable to believe that a majority of the 35,000 septic systems in the county will ever be put on municipal sewer. The County Health Department has invested in a program that allows septic contractors to report every pump out directly from the field, using their phones. If all pump outs were consistently reported, it would help inform the Utilities department about problem areas that might need to be addressed with future sewer lines. • If the County Comprehensive Plan is the correct document to set policy that will guide future change then perhaps we need to set a policy to work toward changing the State Statute that prohibits septic tank inspections and required pump outs. Unfortunately, because of the type of soils in our county, residents may have a failing system and not know it. As long as the effluent leaves their homes, they assume everything is working properly. A regular schedule of required pump outs has the potential to reduce groundwater pollution. • A related topic also needs to be addressed by policy - Biosolids Class B Land Application. It is now illegal for all of the southern counties to spread Class B Biosolids on their rural lands. We are now one of dumping grounds for this product from utilities from Miami northward. Biosolids have a high concentration of phosphorus in addition to nitrogen and pharmaceuticals. The phosphorus stimulates fresh water blue green algae blooms that are famous in Lake Okeechobee due to earlier biosolids application. An ordinance can be created to prohibit this practice before we experience guacamole -like algal blooms similar to Martin County. Thank you for considering my thoughts, Judy Orcutt z-p'q. Overallf ,- Assumed _;, reductioneffectiveness _ _ ri Legacy systems reduction,estirmte�T with insufficient 0 Less than o 0 /0 00/0 Out of compliance with separation to water baseline current rules table Conventional septic tank soil 0 Baseline 30% 30% Conventional system treatment unit construction permit (STU) Intermittent Sand 20% Baseline 24% 44% Legacy system F i lter (rare) NSF-40Aerobic Treatment Unit 30% Baseline 21% 51% ATU (ATU) Subset ofATUs Performance Based = • .:< with established nitrogen 50% Baseline 15% 65% Treatment System (PETS) , ' reductiorVNSF 245 or ATU �> Recirculating 50% Baseline 15% 65% Performance Based Treatment System { media filter (PBTS)IATU innovative Assume 40% Conflicts with effective soil' .f STUwith additional 0 beyond 70% 70% depth requirements in some possible ` layers settings, water conventional table separation Y� Floridatwo-stage 90% Baseline 3% 93% TBD (PETS) z-p'q. 10,k3. INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA MEMORANDUM TO: Jason E. Brown County Administrator THROUGH: Stan Boling, AICP Community Development Director Roland M. DeBlois, AICP Chief, Environmental Planning & Code Enforcement FROM: Steven S. Hitt, M.S. Senior Environmental Planner DATE: February 27, 2018 SUBJECT: County Initiated Request to Amend the Text of the Coastal Management Element and Future Land Use Element of the County's Comprehensive Plan Relating to Sea Level Rise It is requested that the following information be given formal consideration by the Board of County Commissioners at its regular meeting of March 20, 2018. DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS This is a county -initiated request to amend the text of the Coastal Management Element and Future Land Use Element of the county's Comprehensive Plan. The purpose of this amendment is to revise the Coastal Management Element and Future Land Use Element to update information and incorporate goals, objectives and policy changes related to planning for sea level rise impacts as mandated by the state. Comprehensive Plan Amendment Review Procedures Although the number of plan amendments that the county may consider is not limited, the County's Comprehensive Plan regulates the frequency with which the county may amend its Comprehensive Plan. According to the County's Comprehensive Plan, plan amendments are limited to four times per calendar year. For that reason, the county accepts general plan amendment applications only during the "window" months of January, April, July and October. In this case, the subject application was submitted during the January 2018 window. The procedures for reviewing a Comprehensive Plan amendment involve several steps. First, the Planning and Zoning Commission, as the Local Planning Agency, conducts a public hearing to review the request. At that hearing, the Commission makes a recommendation to the Board of County Commissioners to approve, approve with modifications, or deny the requested amendment. 379 C:\Users\Iegistar\AppData\Local\Temp\BCL Technologies\easyPDF 8 a\13CL@200E823F\@BCL@200E823F.doc 1 Following the Planning and Zoning Commission action, the Board of County Commissioners conducts two public hearings. The first of those hearings, known as the transmittal hearing, is for a preliminary decision on the amendment request. At that hearing, the Board determines whether or not the amendment warrants transmittal to state and regional review agencies for their consideration. If the Comprehensive Plan amendment is transmitted, state and regional review agencies review the amendment as it pertains to each agency's area of focus. Review agencies then send their comments directly to the county and the State Land Planning Agency. Subsequent to staff and/or the applicant addressing any issues raised in the review agency comments, a second and final Board of County Commissioners public hearing, known as the adoption hearing, is conducted. If the Board approves the request at the final hearing, then the approved amendment is submitted to the State Land Planning Agency and to the other review agencies. The amendment becomes effective 31 days after the State Land Planning Agency determines that the approved amendment submittal is complete, unless a challenge is filed by an affected party. Planning and Zoning Commission Action At its regular meeting of February 8, 2018, the Planning & Zoning Commission voted 5-0 to recommend that the Board of County Commissioners approve the proposed amendments to the Coastal Management Element and Future Land Use Element for transmittal to state and regional review agencies. The subject public hearing ("transmittal hearing") is the second step in the Comprehensive Plan amendment process where the Board of County Commissioners must decide whether or not to transmit the proposed amendment to state and regional review agencies. BACKGROUND The Coastal Management Element is one of 12 elements comprising the Indian River County 2030 Comprehensive Plan. The County adopted its comprehensive plan in accordance with Florida Statutes (FS) Chapter 163 (Part Il), which sets forth requirements and criteria for local government comprehensive plans. Within FS Chapter 163, Section 163.3178 pertains specifically to coastal management (see Attachment 1 to this report). Under that section, the description of the Legislature's intent is "that local government comprehensive plans restrict development activities where such activities would damage or destroy coastal resources, and that such plans protect human life and limit public expenditures in areas that are subject to destruction by natural disaster." In fulfilling that intent, the County's current Coastal Management Element, among other things, includes policies that limit certain development, public infrastructure and facilities in the Coastal High Hazard Area (CHHA), which is defined as the area below the storm surge line of a Category 1 hurricane. Senate Bill 1094 In 2015, the State enacted Senate Bill 1094, relating to "peril of flood" (see Attachment 2). Senate Bill 1094 modified FS Subsection 163.3178(2)(f)and requires local governments in Florida to "include development and redevelopment principles, strategies, and engineering solutions that reduce the flood 380 C:\Users\legistu\AppData\Local\Temp\BCL Technologies\easyPDF 8\ BCL@200E823F\@BCL@200E823F.doc 2 risk in coastal areas which results from high -tide events, storm surge, flash floods, stormwater runoff, and the related impacts of sea -level rise" within coastal management elements of comprehensive plans. Although the County's current Coastal Management Element references sea level rise as a concern for future impacts to coastal resources and property, the Element does not evaluate and provide policy on the issue. This past year, county staff consulted state staff to determine if the County's current plan adequately addresses potential sea level rise impacts in compliance with Senate Bill 1094 revisions. County staff was advised by the state that an amendment is in fact necessary to meet the sea level rise impact assessment and planning requirement. On August 15, 2017, staff reported the state's findings to the Board of County Commissioners (Board) and the Board authorized staff to initiate the comprehensive plan amendment process. To that end, staff has drafted proposed amendments to the Coastal Management Element and, for cross-reference purposes the Future Land Use Element, to address the potential impacts of sea level rise. The Board is now to consider the proposed amendments and is to make a decision to transmit or not transmit the amendments to state and regional review agencies. ANALYSIS In drafting the proposed amendments, staff researched and evaluated various projections of sea level rise, as those projections relate to Florida and particularly Indian River County. Staff also researched and evaluated the best available information on local inundation scenarios, likely potential impacts during a 40+ year planning horizon (the year 2060), and appropriate policies to address potential impacts. Sea Level Rise Projections In Florida, baseline relative sea level measurements can be derived from historical tide gauge records of mean monthly sea level. In fact, average monthly sea level measurements have been recorded at tide stations located in Key West, Cedar Key, and Fernandina Beach for more than a century. The yearly averages of these historic data indicate a gradual trend of rising mean sea level between 1897 and 2017. Based on those data sets, sea levels at Key West, Cedar Key, and Fernandina Beach rose approximately 12.72", 12.66", and 15.63" over the last 100 years. Regional mapping and vulnerability assessment studies related to sea level rise were initially developed by federal, state, and local government agencies in the early 2000s. Circa 2009, development of consistent regional climate change adaptation strategies became the basis for formation of the Southeast Florida Regional Climate Change Compact (SFRCCC), which was represented by four coastal counties: Monroe, Miami -Dade, Broward, and Palm -Beach. The SFRCCC created a Unified Sea Level Rise Projection for Southeast Florida in 2011 based on U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Engineering Circulars guidance documents, historical tidal data from Key West (1913-1999), and available scientific literature on the subject at the time. This Unified Sea Level Rise Projection was later revised in 2015 based on updated guidance documents from the United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), and the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). According to the revised (2015) projection, the region may experience between 14 inches and 34 inches of sea level rise (above 1992 mean sea level) by 2060. All projections show at least some degree of acceleration in the rate of sea level rise compared to the 1897 to 2017 time period. 381 C:\Usm\legistar\AppData\Local\Tmp\BCLTechnologies\easyPDF 8\@BCL@200E823F\@BCL@200E823F.doc 3 Based on the best available data from the NOAA Coastal Service Center sea level projection models and best available local projected inundation data, including LiDAR elevation data, county staff has mapped one, two, and three foot sea level rise inundation scenarios, for incorporation into the Coastal Management Element (Figures 9.16, 9.17, and 9.18 of the proposed amendments). For planning purposes the three foot (36") sea level rise scenario represents the worst case projection for 2060 (34" rise). Proposed Amendments The proposed amendments to the Coastal Management Element consist of three main sections: Revisions to the Existing Conditions section; Revisions to the Analysis section; and Revisions to the Goals, Objectives and Policies section. The proposed revisions to the Existing Conditions section summarizes various sea level rise measurements, assessments and projection studies that have occurred to date, as previously summarized in this memorandum. Under the Analysis section, the proposed revisions delve into acreage estimates of possible and likely sea level rise impacts to various geographic areas under the one, two, and three foot sea level rise inundation scenarios. Also evaluated are potential sea level rise impacts to existing public facilities and infrastructure. Staff s findings, as reflected in the revisions, are summarized as follows: • Privately owned estuarine wetlands and undeveloped lagoon island conservation areas appear to be the most vulnerable to SLR inundation impacts. It is estimated that more than 85% of existing coastal wetlands are at risk of inundation under the three foot sea level rise scenario. Most physical infrastructure such as roadways, power plants, airports, landfills, hospitals and schools in the County that are considered critical facilities would not be substantially impacted under the one, two and three foot sea level rise scenarios. Areas that would potentially be affected are as follows: facilities along the Indian River Lagoon which incorporate coastal mosquito impoundments and estuarine marshes, and approximately 6.8 acres to 16.5 acres of undeveloped (and not filled/elevated) acreage associated with the Indian River Medical Center. It should be noted that existing Medical Center facilities and infrastructure are elevated and would not be impacted under the 1', 2', or 3' inundation scenarios. The vast majority of the worst case scenario inundation impacts (3' or 36" rise by 2060) are projected to occur within the Coastal High Hazard Area (CHHA, the area below the storm surge line of a Category 1 hurricane). In fact, in many areas the CHHA is more conservative (more upland located) than the 3' inundation area. The CHHA generally encompasses areas located east of US Highway 1 and Indian River Boulevard on the mainland and the majority of the land west of SR AlA on the barrier island. On the northern barrier island areas such as Windsor, Summerplace, Sea Oaks Beach and Tennis Club and eastern portions of John's Island lie east of (outside of) the CHHA. Similarly, the Vero Beach Estates and Riomar Subdivisions are predominantly east of the CHHA within the City of Vero Beach/central region of the barrier 382 C:\Users\legistar\AppData\Local\Temp\BCL Technologies\easyPDF 8\@13CLC200E823F\Ca BCL@200E823F.doc 4 island. On the southern barrier island, the CHHA follows along SR A 1 A essentially covering all lands west toward the Indian River Lagoon. Mitigation strategies that will likely have the greatest effect on reducing exposure to inundation risk due to one, two and three foot SLR scenarios involve reducing the population and development potential within the CHHA. Strategies that accomplish these goals include prohibiting development density increases and reducing public infrastructure expenditures in at risk areas identified on the inundation maps, prohibiting new assisted living facilities and similar facilities for special needs population within the CHHA, and acquiring conservation and open space lands in the CHHA when opportune. To effect such policies within the CHHA, the proposed amendments designate the CHHA as an "Adaptation Action Area" (AAA) for special sea level rise policies, as provided in the state's guidance on sea level rise strategies. Based on the analysis and findings, staff is proposing a new Coastal Management objective (Objective 15) for sea level rise adaptive strategies, with eight new proposed policies to serve that objective. The proposed Objective 15 reads as follows: Through 2060, the County shall adopt, implement, and pursue strategies that increase community resiliency and protect property, infrastructure, and cultural and natural resources from the impacts of sea level rise. The eight proposed policies serving the objective are summarized as follows: • Policy 15.1: By 2022, the County shall conduct an inventory and identify public facilities, coastal wetlands, and infrastructure that may be at risk to sea level rise, and shall consider resiliency improvements and infrastructure relocations as part of capital improvements plans where warranted. • Policy 15.2: During major plan evaluations and updates, sea level rise projections shall be considered when evaluating or updating policies related to sea level rise. • Policy 15.3: Beginning in 2022, the County shall periodically review and update (every five years) sea level rise projections used in the Coastal Management Element. • Policy 15.4: On an on-going basis, the County shall coordinate with local municipalities on sea level rise adaptation and mitigation measures. • Policy 15.5: The County adopts the CHHA as an "Adaptation Action Area" (AAA) for mitigation measures and resiliency improvements, as well as an area for limiting public infrastructure expenditures (similar to existing CHHA policy and land development regulations). • Policy 15.6: By 2023, the County shall re-evaluate flood zone requirements and mitigation strategies within the AAA. 383 C:\Users\legistar\AppData\Local\Temp\BCL Technologies\easyPDF 8\@BCL@200E823F\@BCL@200E823F.doc 5 Policy 15.7: The County prohibits within the AAA new adult congregate living facilities, nursing homes, and other similar facilities that serve special needs populations (similar to existing CHHA policy and land development regulations). • Policy 15.8: The County prohibits within the AAA increases in land use designation densities (similar to existing CHHA policy). Future Land Use Element Cross-reference Amendment For purposes of cross-reference, Future Land Use Element Policy 17.5 is proposed to be revised to reflect the designation of the CHHA as an AAA, subject to the new Coastal Management Element sea level rise policies (see Attachment 4). Consistency with Comprehensive Plan Comprehensive Plan amendment proposals are reviewed for consistency with all applicable policies of the comprehensive plan. As per section 800.07(1) of the County Code, the "Comprehensive Plan may only be amended in such a way as to preserve the internal consistency of the plan." In evaluating a proposed comprehensive plan amendment for internal consistency, the most important consideration is Future Land Use Element Policy 14.3. This policy requires that one of four criteria be met in order to approve a comprehensive plan amendment. These criteria are: • The proposed amendment will correct an oversight in the approved plan; • The proposed amendment will correct a mistake in the approved plan; • The proposed amendment is warranted based on a substantial change in circumstances; or • The proposed amendment involves a swap or reconfiguration of land use designations at separate sites, and that swap or reconfiguration will not increase the overall land use density or intensity depicted on the Future Land Use Map. In this case, the proposed comprehensive plan amendments meet Policy 14.3's third criterion, in that there has been a substantial change in circumstances. That change is two -fold. First, there has been a change in the state's requirements for local planning (through enactment of Senate Bill 1094) that all local government comprehensive plans analyze and plan for sea level rise as it relates to "peril of flood" risks to coastal areas. Second, there has been a developing body of evidence that planning for potential sea level rise impacts in coastal areas is prudent if not necessary. 384 C:\Usmrs egistuWppData\Lo l\Temp\BCL Technologies\easyPDF 8\@13CL@200E823F\Ca)BCL@200E823F.doe 6 SUMMARY As described herein, Senate Bill 1094, enacted in 2015, requires local governments to consider the effects of sea level rise in coastal management elements of comprehensive plans. The proposed amendments summarize and take into account sea level rise projections as they affect coastal resources, infrastructure, facilities and development in coastal areas. Staff's finding is that most impacts under one, two and three foot sea level rise inundation scenarios would occur to estuarine wetlands, lagoon islands, and lands currently identified as within the Coastal High Hazard Area (defined as the area below the storm surge line of a Category 1 hurricane). The proposed objective and policies call for and implement certain strategies to reduce impacts to areas and infrastructure projected to be subject to sea level rise inundation in future years. RECOMMENDATION Based on the analysis, staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners: Adopt the attached resolution for transmittal of the proposed comprehensive plan text amendments to the state and regional review agencies. 2. Announce its intention to hold and advertise a final public hearing at the adoption stage of the plan amendment process. ATTACHMENTS 1. Florida Statutes Section 163.3178 2. Senate Bill 1094 3. Draft Minutes from the February 8, 2018 PZC Meeting 4. Proposed amendments to the Coastal Management Element 5. Proposed amendment to Policy 17.5 of the Future Land Use Element 6. Coastal Management Element Objective 5 & Capital Improvements Element Objective 2 7. Transmittal Resolution 385 C:\Usm\lcgistar\AppData\Local\Temp\BCL Technologies\easyPDF 8\ BCL@200E823F a\13CL@200E823F.doc 7 Select Year: 2017 • Go The 2017 Florida Statutes Title XI Chapter 163 View Entire COUNTY ORGANIZATION AND INTERGOVERNMENTAL INTERGOVERNMENTAL Chapter RELATIONS PROGRAMS 163.3178 Coastal management.— (1) The Legislature recognizes there is significant interest in the resources of the coastal zone of the state. Further, the Legislature recognizes that, in the event of a natural disaster, the state may provide financial assistance to local governments for the reconstruction of roads, sewer systems, and other public facilities. Therefore, it is the intent of the Legislature that local government comprehensive plans restrict development activities where such activities would damage or destroy coastal resources, and that such plans protect human life and limit public expenditures in areas that are subject to destruction by natural disaster. (2) Each coastal management element required by s. 163.3177(6)(8) shall be based on studies, surveys, and data; be consistent with coastal resource plans prepared and adopted pursuant to general or special law; and contain: (a) A land use and inventory map of existing coastal uses, wildlife habitat, wetland and other vegetative communities, undeveloped areas, areas subject to coastal flooding, public access routes to beach and shore resources, historic preservation areas, and other areas of special concern to local government. (b) An analysis of the environmental, socioeconomic, and fiscal impact of development and redevelopment proposed in the future land use plan, with required infrastructure to support this development or redevelopment, on the natural and historical resources of the coast and the plans and principles to be used to control development and redevelopment to eliminate or mitigate the adverse impacts on coastal wetlands; living marine resources; barrier islands, including beach and dune systems; unique wildlife habitat; historical and archaeological sites; and other fragile coastal resources. (c) An analysis of the effects of existing drainage systems and the impact of point source and nonpoint source pollution on estuarine water quality and the plans and principles, including existing state and regional regulatory programs, which shall be used to maintain or upgrade water quality while maintaining sufficient quantities of water flow. (d) A component which outlines principles for hazard mitigation and protection of human life against the effects of natural disaster, including population evacuation, which take into consideration the capability to safely evacuate the density of coastal population proposed in the future land use plan element in the event of an impending natural disaster. The Division of Emergency Management shall manage the update of the regional hurricane evacuation studies, ensure such studies are done in a consistent manner, and ensure that the methodology used for modeling storm surge is that used by the National Hurricane Center. (e) A component which outlines principles for protecting existing beach and dune systems from human -induced erosion and for restoring altered beach and dune systems. (f) A redevelopment component that outlines the principles that must be used to eliminate inappropriate and unsafe development in the coastal areas when opportunities arise. The component must: 1. Include development and redevelopment principles, strategies, and engineering solutions that reduce the flood risk in coastal areas which results from high -tide events, storm surge, flash floods, stormwater runoff, and the related impacts of sea -level rise. 386 2. Encourage the use of best practices development and redevelopment principles, strategies, and engineering solutions that will result in the removal of coastal real property from flood zone designations established by the Federal Emergency Management Agency. 3. Identify site development techniques and best practices that may reduce losses due to flooding and claims made under flood insurance policies issued in this state. 4. Be consistent with, or more stringent than, the flood -resistant construction requirements in the Florida Building Code and applicable flood plain management regulations set forth in 44 C:F.R. part 60. 5. Require that any construction activities seaward of the coastal construction control lines established pursuant to s. 161.053 be consistent with chapter 161. 6. Encourage local governments to participate in the National Flood Insurance Program Community Rating System administered by the Federal Emergency Management Agency to achieve flood insurance premium discounts for their residents. (g) A shoreline use component that identifies public access to beach and shoreline areas and addresses the need for water -dependent and water -related facilities, including marinas, along shoreline areas. Such component must include the strategies that will be used to preserve recreational and commercial working waterfronts as defined in s. 342.07. (h) Designation of coastal high -hazard areas and the criteria for mitigation for a comprehensive plan amendment in a coastal high -hazard area as defined in subsection (8). The coastal high -hazard area is the area below the elevation of the category 1 storm surge line as established by a Sea, Lake, and Overland Surges from Hurricanes (SLOSH) computerized storm surge model. Application of mitigation and the application of development and redevelopment policies, pursuant to s. 380.27(2), and any rules adopted thereunder, shall be at the discretion of local government. (i) A component which outlines principles for providing that financial assurances are made that required public facilities will be in place to meet the demand imposed by the completed development or redevelopment. Such public facilities will be scheduled for phased completion to coincide with demands generated by the development or redevelopment. (j) An identification of regulatory and management techniques that the local government plans to adopt or has adopted in order to mitigate the threat to human life and to control proposed development and redevelopment in order to protect the coastal environment and give consideration to cumulative impacts. (k) A component which includes the comprehensive master plan prepared by each deepwater port listed in s. 311.09(1), which addresses existing port facilities and any proposed expansions, and which adequately addresses the applicable requirements of paragraphs (a) -(k) for areas within the port and proposed expansion areas. Such component shall be submitted to the appropriate local government at least 6 months prior to the due date of the local plan and shall be integrated with, and shall meet all criteria specified in, the coastal management element. "The appropriate local government" means the municipality having the responsibility for the area in which the deepwater port lies, except that where no municipality has responsibility, where a municipality and a county each have responsibility, or where two or more municipalities each have responsibility for the area in which the deepwater port lies, "the appropriate local government" means the county which has responsibility for the area in which the deepwater port lies. Failure by a deepwater port which is not part of a local government to submit its component to the appropriate local government shall not result in a local government being subject to sanctions pursuant to ss. 163.3167 and 163.3184. However, a deepwater port which is not part of a local government shall be subject to sanctions pursuant to s. 163.3184. (3) Expansions to port harbors, spoil disposal sites, navigation channels, turning basins, harbor berths, and other related inwater harbor facilities of ports listed in s. 403.021(9); port transportation facilities and projects listed in s. 311.07(3)(b); intermodal transportation facilities identified pursuant to s. 311.09(3); and facilities determined by the state land planning agency and applicable general-purpose local government to be port -related industrial or commercial projects located within 3 miles of or in a port master plan area which rely upon the use of port and intermodal transportation facilities may not be designated as developments of regional impact if s� expansions, projects, or facilities are consistent with comprehensive master plans that are in compliance with this section. (4) Improvements and maintenance of federal and state highways that have been approved as part of a plan approved pursuant to s. 380.045 or s. 380.05 shall be exempt from the provisions of s. 380.27(2). (5) The appropriate dispute resolution process provided under s. 186.509 must be used to reconcile inconsistencies between port master plans and local comprehensive plans. In recognition of the state's commitment to deepwater ports, the state comprehensive plan must include goals, objectives, and policies that establish a statewide strategy for enhancement of existing deepwater ports, ensuring that priority is given to water-dependent land uses. As an incentive for promoting plan consistency, port facilities as defined in s. 315.02(6) on lands owned or controlled by a deepwater port as defined in s. 311.09(1), as of the effective date of this act shall not be subject to development-of-regional-impact review provided the port either successfully completes an alternative comprehensive development agreement with a local government pursuant to ss. 163.3220-163.3243 or successfully enters into a development agreement with the state land planning agency and applicable local government pursuant to s. 380.032 or, where the port is a department of a local government, successfully enters into a development agreement with the state land planning agency pursuant to s. 380.032. Port facilities as defined in s. 315.02(6) on lands not owned or controlled by a deepwater port as defined in s. 311.09(1) as of the effective date of this act shalt not be subject to development-of-regional-impact review provided the port successfully enters into a development agreement with the state land planning agency and applicable local government pursuant to s. 380.032 or, where the port is a department of a local government, successfully enters into a development agreement with the state land planning agency pursuant to s. 380.032. (6) Each port listed in s. 311.09(1) and each local government in the coastal area which has spoil disposal responsibilities shall provide for or identify disposal sites for dredged materials in the future land use and port elements of the local comprehensive plan as needed to assure proper long-term management of material dredged from navigation channels, sufficient long-range disposal capacity, environmental sensitivity and compatibility, and reasonable cost and transportation. The disposal site selection criteria shall be developed in consultation with navigation and inlet districts and other appropriate state and federal agencies and the public. For areas owned or controlled by ports listed in s. 311.09(1) and proposed port expansion areas, compliance with the provisions of this subsection shall be achieved through comprehensive master plans prepared by each port and integrated with the appropriate local plan pursuant to paragraph (2)(k). (7) Each county shall establish a county-based process for identifying and prioritizing coastal properties so they may be acquired as part of the state's land acquisition programs. This process must include the establishment of criteria for prioritizing coastal acquisitions which, in addition to recognizing pristine coastal properties and coastal properties of significant or important environmental sensitivity, recognize hazard mitigation, beach access, beach management, urban recreation, and other policies necessary for effective coastal management. (8)(a) A proposed comprehensive plan amendment shall be found in compliance with state coastal high-hazard provisions if: 1. The adopted level of service for out-of-county hurricane evacuation is maintained for a category 5 storm event as measured on the Saffir-Simpson scale; or 2. A 12-hour evacuation time to shelter is maintained for a category 5 storm event as measured on the Saffir- Simpson scale and shelter space reasonably expected to accommodate the residents of the development contemplated by a proposed comprehensive plan amendment is available; or 3. Appropriate mitigation is provided that will satisfy subparagraph 1. or subparagraph 2. Appropriate mitigation shalt include, without limitation, payment of money, contribution of land, and construction of hurricane shelters and transportation facilities. Required mitigation may not exceed the amount required for a developer to accommodate impacts reasonably attributable to development. A local government and a developer shalt enter into a binding agreement to memorialize the mitigation plan. (b) For those local governments that have not established a level of service for out-of-county hurricane evacuation by July 1, 2008, by following the process in paragraph (a), the level of service shall be no greateran 16 hours for a category 5 storm event as measured on the Saffir-Simpson scale. 33 a (c) This subsection shall become effective immediately and shall apply to all local governments. No later than July 1, 2008, local governments shall amend their future land use map and coastal management element to include the new definition of coastal high -hazard area and to depict the coastal high -hazard area on the future land use map. History.—s. 7, ch. 85-55; s. 8, ch. 86-191; s. 24, ch. 87-224; s. 7, ch. 93-206; s. 899, ch. 95-147; s. 11, ch. 96-320; s. 65, ch. 99-251; s. 2, ch. 2005-157; s. 2, ch. 2006-68; s. 4, ch. 2009-85; s. 44, ch. 2010-102; s. 14, ch. 2011-139; ss. 7, 80, ch. 2012-96; s. 6, ch. 2012-99; s. 1, ch. 2015-69. Copyright © 1995-2018 The Florida Legislature • Privacy Statement • Contact Us 389 Florida Senate - 2015 By Senator Brandes SB 1094 22-00259C-15 20151094 1 A bill to be entitled 2 An act relating to the peril of flood; amending s. 3 163.3178, F.S.; specifying components that must be 4 contained in the coastal management element required 5 for a local government comprehensive plan; creating s. 6 195.088, F.S.; defining terms; requiring a licensed 7 surveyor and mapper to complete an elevation 8 certificate in accordance with a checklist developed 9 by the Division of Emergency Management and to submit 10 a copy of the elevation certificate to a specified 11 property appraiser within a certain time after its 12 completion; authorizing the redaction of certain 13 personal information from the copy; requiring each 14 property appraiser to submit the copies of elevation 15 certificates to the division on a schedule established 16 by the division; amending s. 627.715, F.S.; revising 17 the required coverage for customized flood insurance; 18 specifying how such coverage may differ from standard 19 and preferred flood insurance; deleting a provision 20 that prohibits supplemental flood insurance from 21 including excess coverage over any other insurance 22 covering the peril of flood; revising the information 23 that must be prominently noted on a certain page of a 24 flood insurance policy; requiring an agent to offer a 25 flood insurance quote when quoting an insurance policy 26 that will cover a residential structure located within 27 a specified area; requiring the agent to maintain a 28 record of an insured's declination of flood insurance 29 coverage for a specified period of time; revising the Page 1 of 9 390 CODING: Words st-Lcieken are deletions; words underlined are additions. Florida Senate - 2015 SB 1094 22-00259C-15 20151094 30 notice that must be provided to and acknowledged by an 31 applicant for flood coverage from an authorized or 32 surplus lines insurer if the applicant's property is 33 receiving flood insurance under the National Flood 34 Insurance Program; allowing an authorized insurer to 35 request a certification from the Office of Insurance 36 Regulation which indicates that a policy, contract, or 37 endorsement issued by the insurer provides coverage 38 for the peril of flood which equals or exceeds the 39 flood coverage offered by the National Flood Insurance 40 Program; authorizing such insurer or its agent to 41 reference or include the certification in specified 42 advertising, communications, and documentation; 43 providing an effective date. 44 45 Be It Enacted by the Legislature of the State of Florida: 46 47 Section 1. Paragraph (f) of subsection (2) of section 48 163.3178, Florida Statutes, is amended to read: 49 163.3178 Coastal management. - 50 (2) Each coastal management element required by s. 51 163.3177(6)(g) shall be based on studies, surveys, and data; be 52 consistent with coastal resource plans prepared and adopted 53 pursuant to general or special law; and contain: 54 (f) A redevelopment component that whieh outlines the 55 principles that must w ieh shams= be used to eliminate 56 inappropriate and unsafe development in the coastal areas when 57 opportunities arise. The component must: 58 1. Include development and redevelopment principles, Page 2 of 9 391 CODING: Wordsst-ric-ken are deletions; words underlined are additions. Florida Senate - 2015 SB 1094 22-00259C-15 20151094 59 strategies, and engineering solutions that reduce the flood risk 60 in coastal areas which results from high -tide events, storm 61 surge, flash floods, stormwater runoff, and the related impacts 62 of sea -level rise. 63 2. Encourage the use of best practices development and 64 redevelopment principles, strategies, and engineering solutions 65 that will result in the removal of coastal real property from 66 flood zone designations established by the Federal Emergency 67 Management Agency. 68 3. Identify site development techniques and best practices 69 that may reduce losses due to flooding and claims made under 70 flood insurance policies issued in this state. 71 Section 2. Section 195.088, Florida Statutes, is created to 72 read: 73 195.088 Property appraisers to submit elevation 74 certificates to the Division of Emergency Management. - 75 (1) As used in this section, the term: 76 (a) "Division" means the Division of Emergency Management 77 established within the Executive Office of the Governor under s. 78 14.2016. 79 (b) "Elevation certificate" means the certificate used to 80 demonstrate the elevation of property which has been developed 81 by the Federal Emergency Management Agency pursuant to federal 82 floodplain management regulation or which is completed by a 83 licensed surveyor and mapper. 84 (c) "Licensed surveyor and mapper" has the same meaning as 85 provided in s. 472.005 for "surveyor and mapper." 86 (2) An elevation certificate must be completed by a 87 licensed surveyor and mapper in accordance with the checklist Page 3 of 9 392 CODING: Words � ken are deletions; words underlined are additions. Florida Senate - 2015 SB 1094 22-00259C-15 20151094 88 developed by the division. Within 30 days after the completion 89 of an elevation certificate, a licensed surveyor and mapper must 90 submit a copy of the certificate to the property appraiser of 91 the county in which the property that was surveyed or mapped is 92 located. The copy must be unaltered, except that the licensed 93 surveyor and mapper may redact the name of the property owner. 94 (3) Each property appraiser shall submit the copies 95 received under subsection (2) to the division on a regular 96 schedule established by the division. 97 Section 3. Section 627.715, Florida Statutes, is amended to 98 read: 99 627.715 Flood insurance. -An authorized insurer may issue an 100 insurance policy, contract, or endorsement providing personal 101 lines residential coverage for the peril of flood on any 102 structure or the contents of personal property contained 103 therein, subject to this section. This section does not apply to 104 commercial lines residential or commercial lines nonresidential 105 coverage for the peril of flood. This section also does not 106 apply to coverage for the peril of flood that is excess coverage 107 over any other insurance covering the peril of flood. An insurer 108 may issue flood insurance policies, contracts, or endorsements 109 on a standard, preferred, customized, or supplemental basis. 110 (1)(a)1. Standard flood insurance must cover only losses 111 from the peril of flood, as defined in paragraph (b), equivalent 112 to that provided under a standard flood insurance policy under 113 the National Flood Insurance Program. Standard flood insurance 114 issued under this section must provide the same coverage, 115 including deductibles and adjustment of losses, as that provided 116 under a standard flood insurance policy under the National Flood Page 4 of 9 393 CODING: Wordss�a-rieken are deletions; words underlined are additions. Florida Senate - 2015 SB 1094 22-00259C-15 20151094 117 Insurance Program. 118 2. Preferred flood insurance must include the same coverage 119 as standard flood insurance but: 120 a. Include, within the definition of "flood," losses from 121 water intrusion originating from outside the structure that are 122 not otherwise covered under the definition of "flood" provided 123 in paragraph (b). 124 b. Include coverage for additional living expenses. 125 c. Require that any loss under personal property or 126 contents coverage that is repaired or replaced be adjusted only 127 on the basis of replacement costs up to the policy limits. 128 3. Customized flood insurance must provide ;rte coverage 129 for the peril of flood, and may differ from standard and 130 preferred thaw is 9rea-der than the —eeraeicag Previeled iineleLa 131 flood insurance by: 132 a. Including coverage that is broader than the coverage 133 provided under standard flood insurance; 134 b. Being in an amount agreed upon by the insurer and 135 insured, such as coverage that is limited to the total amount of 136 each outstanding mortgage applicable to the covered property, if 137 such coverage does not include a provision penalizing the 138 policyholder for not insuring the covered property up to the 139 replacement cost; 140 c. Including a deductible as authorized in s. 627.701; 141 d. Requiring that a loss to a dwelling be adjusted in 142 accordance with s. 627.7011(3) or adjusted only on the basis of 143 the actual cash value of the property; 144 e. Restricting flood coverage to the principal building, as 145 defined in the applicable policy; Page 5 of 9 394 CODING: Wordssti=ieken are deletions; words underlined are additions. Florida Senate - 2015 SB 1094 22-00259C-15 20151094 146 f. Including or excluding coverage for additional living 147 expenses; and 148 g. Excluding coverage, as to the peril of flood, for 149 personal property or contents. 150 4. Supplemental flood insurance may provide coverage 151 designed to supplement a flood policy obtained from the National 152 Flood Insurance Program or from an insurer issuing standard or 153 preferred flood insurance pursuant to this section. Supplemental 154 flood insurance may provide, but need not be limited to, 155 coverage for jewelry, art, deductibles, and additional living 156 expenses. 157 €ems -the peL-11ref fleed-mat- is r -excess eeveEage evei= _n�he~� 15 8 ee v eici-n the peril e f fleed. 159 (b) "Flood" means a general and temporary condition of 160 partial or complete inundation of two or more acres of normally 161 dry land area or of two or more properties, at least one of 162 which is the policyholder's property, from: 163 1. Overflow of inland or tidal waters; 164 2. Unusual and rapid accumulation or runoff of surface 165 waters from any source; 166 3. Mudflow; or 167 4. Collapse or subsidence of land along the shore of a lake 168 or similar body of water as a result of erosion or undermining 169 caused by waves or currents of water exceeding anticipated 170 cyclical levels that result in a flood as defined in this 171 paragraph. 172 ( 2 ) Any ___.__ __ _-____ ___ Flood coverage deductibles and er- 173 policy limits pursuant to this section, ,lattt net 174 34mEft4mteel te, Eiediaetibles, must be prominently noted on the policy Page 6 of 9 395 CODING: Words en are deletions; words underlined are additions. Florida Senate - 2015 SB 1094 22-00259C-15 20151094 175 declarations page or face page. 176 (3)(a) An insurer may establish and use flood coverage 177 rates in accordance with the rate standards provided in s. 178 627.062. 179 (b) For flood coverage rates filed with the office before 180 October 1, 2019, the insurer may also establish and use such 181 rates in accordance with the rates, rating schedules, or rating 182 manuals filed by the insurer with the office which allow the 183 insurer a reasonable rate of return on flood coverage written in 184 this state. Flood coverage rates established pursuant to this 185 paragraph are not subject to s. 627.062(2)(a) and (f). An 186 insurer shall notify the office of any change to such rates 187 within 30 days after the effective date of the change. The 188 notice must include the name of the insurer and the average 189 statewide percentage change in rates. Actuarial data with regard 190 to such rates for flood coverage must be maintained by the 191 insurer for 2 years after the effective date of such rate change 192 and is subject to examination by the office. The office may 193 require the insurer to incur the costs associated with an 194 examination. Upon examination, the office, in accordance with 195 generally accepted and reasonable actuarial techniques, shall 196 consider the rate factors in s. 627.062(2)(b), (c), and (d), and 197 the standards in s. 627.062(2)(e), to determine if the rate is 198 excessive, inadequate, or unfairly discriminatory. 199 (4) A surplus lines agent may export a contract or 200 endorsement providing flood coverage to an eligible surplus 201 lines insurer without making a diligent effort to seek such 202 coverage from three or more authorized insurers under s. 203 626.916(1)(a). This subsection expires July 1, 2017. Page 7 of 9 396 CODING: Words st-r-leleen are deletions; words underlined are additions. Florida Senate - 2015 SB 1094 22-00259C-15 20151094 204 (5) In addition to any other applicable requirements, an 205 insurer providing flood coverage in this state must: 206 (a) Notify the office at least 30 days before writing flood 207 insurance in this state; and 208 (b) File a plan of operation and financial projections or 209 revisions to such plan, as applicable, with the office. 210 (6) Citizens Property Insurance Corporation may not provide 211 insurance for the peril of flood. 212 (7) The Florida Hurricane Catastrophe Fund may not provide 213 reimbursement for losses proximately caused by the peril of 214 flood, including losses that occur during a covered event as 215 defined in s. 215.555(2)(b). 216 (8) An agent must: 217 (a) Offer a flood insurance quote when quoting an insurance 218 policy that will cover a residential structure located within a 219 Special Flood Hazard Area designated by the Federal Emergency 220 Management Agency. If the insured declines to obtain flood 221 insurance coverage, the agent must maintain a record of that 222 declination for 36 months. 223 (b) Upon receiving ebtaiRln' an application for flood 224 coverage from an authorized or surplus lines insurer for a 225 property receiving flood insurance under the National Flood 226 Insurance Program, mit obtain an acknowledgment signed by the 227 applicant before placing the coverage with the authorized or 228 surplus lines insurer. The acknowledgment must notify the 229 applicant that, if the applicant discontinues coverage under the 230 National Flood Insurance Program which is provided at a 231 subsidized rate, the full risk rate for flood insurance may 232 apply to the property if the applicant s•�nsar-anee is later Page 8 of 9 397 CODING: Wordsst-Ed:eken are deletions; words underlined are additions. 233 234 235 236 237 238 2391 2401 2411 2421' 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 2581 Florida Senate - 2015 SB 1094 22-00259C-15 20151094 seeks to reinstate coverageebtaineel under the Pat -renal Flees T..s r -..,e program. (9) With respect to the regulation of flood coverage written in this state by authorized insurers, this section supersedes any other provision in the Florida Insurance Code in the event of a conflict. (10) If federal law or rule requires a certification by a state insurance regulatory official as a condition of qualifying for private flood insurance or disaster assistance, the Commissioner of Insurance Regulation may provide the certification, and such certification is not subject to review under chapter 120. (11) An authorized insurer offering flood insurance in this state may request a certification by the office which indicates that a policy, contract, or endorsement issued by the insurer under this section provides coverage for the peril of flood which equals or exceeds the flood coverage offered by the National Flood Insurance Program. The authorized insurer or its agent may reference or include the certification in advertising and communications with an agent, a lending institution, an insured, and a potential insured. The authorized insurer ma include a statement that notifies an insured of the certification on the declarations page or other policy documentation related to flood coverage. Section 4. This act shall take effect July 1, 2015. Page 9 of 9 398 CODING: Words sticieken are deletions; words underlined are additions. the County to convert septic systems to sewer connections. She concluded discussing the biosolids that are allowed to be spread on Indian River my farmland and ultimately end up in our water systems. 7 Ms. Cheryl Dunn, Environmental Health Manager,iscussed/�ermits for repairs, modifications and new septic systems that her office is r r9ponsible for administering. She explained that her department can "encoura " homeowners to meet the twenty -four -inch separation between the drainfiel and groundwater but that it is voluntary and unenforceable at this time for se is systems installed me or s before 1983. She indicated that as the septic con -tract s typically pull repair permits, there is little to no communication between e homeowner and her department until final inspections are performed. S described the significant cost to individual homeowners to raise the drai fields, adding that for some the communication e e a pe raise t a' io 0 th septic n rn m e ti b d s c e e performed. ra c between e Sn e e t ie r n e rf 0 a Id r contract described s e e e s adding c c smaller properties it could be challenging becau there may not be enough lawn t space available. She advised that while there /recurrently no funds or incentives offered for homeowners to upgrade their rainfield or treatment systems, her wish is that they will become availabl at least for areas that while sewer connection is not a reality, sewage ma e impacting the lagoon. Mr. Vincent Burke, Utility Oervices Director, outlined mandates for new subdivisions and commercial d �elopment to connect to county sewer as well as determinations of mandato onnection for failed septic systems. He compared the costs to repair or up de existing septic systems to that of connecting to County sewer or the ulti ate cost to the environment if neither option is chosen. He stated that the cre ion of new sewer infrastructure includes not only the price 'na' 'n cre commercial a rc' mandatory u p de ti ate co ion of ne of sewer lines and mp systems, but the destruction of roadways, making these 'T projects a publi works issue as well. He concluded that his department continuesatopu2ply for I grants from the State, District and the National Estuary ( ProgramN /)and that additional funding could shorten the timelines needed to connect munities to the County sewer system. xtensive discussion followed regarding County staff's commitment to ur e and identify opportunities to address goals, objectives and policies g rp /at�in to sanitary sewer connections and septic systems. ON MOTION BY Mr. Stewart, SECONDED BY Ms. Waldrop, the members voted unanimously (5-0) to approve staff recommendations on this Legislative matter with language added regarding the County's commitment to pursue and identify opportunities. Part 2: Coastal management element amendments and related amendments to the Future Land Use Element. PZC/Unapproved 6 February 8, 2018 399 F:\BCC\All CommitteesT&M018—AGENDAS & MINUTES\PZC 020818.doc Mr. Steven Hitt, Senior Environmental Planner, detailed proposed edits relating to coastal management in the Future Land Use Element and gave a PowerPoint presentation, copies of which are on file in the Board of County Commissioners (BCC) Office. He recommended that the Commissioners recommend that the BCC approve the proposed amendments to the Coastal Management Element and Future Land Use Element for transmittal to state and regional review agencies. Discussion followed regarding sea level rise projections as they relate to coastal high hazard area policies and safety plans. ON MOTION BY Mr. Brognano, SECONDED BY Ms. Waldrop, the members voted unanimously (5-0) to approve staff recommendations on this Legislative matter. Chairman Polackwich read the following into the record: D. Consideration of Land Development Regulation (LDR) amendments to Chapters 910, 913, 914,. 952 and 971 regarding traffic study requirements, subdivision and site plan review processes and Staff level approval authority for certain uses. [Legislative] Mr. Stan Boling, Community Development Director, reviewed information regarding the proposed LDR amendments. He referenced the Development Review and Permit Process Advisory Committee that was established by the BCC and began meeting in October of 2017 and he went on to detail their proposed Staff supported amendments. He recommended that the Commissioners recommend that the BCC adopt all five ordinances amending Chapters 910, 913, 914, 952 and 971 of the LDR regulations. Discussion followed regarding staff level approvals, sign posting notice policies and appeal processes. It was suggested that notification signs be posted even when there are Staff level approvals for the eight uses proposed to go from PZC approval to staff level approval. Ms. Debbi Robinson, Development Review and Permit Process Advisory Committee Chairperson, recapped the committee's task of streamlining the land development process while still protecting the public's safety, welfare and interests. She clarified that the Staff level approvals would pertain only to permitted uses that generally come to the Board on the Consent agenda, adding four weeks to the process as well as a disproportionate amount of staff time. PZC/Unapproved 7 February 8, 2018 400 FABCCIAII Committees\P&Z\2018—AGENDAS & MINUTESTM 020818.doc ON MOTION BY Mr. Landers, SECONDED BY Mr. Brognano, the members voted unanimously (5-0) to approve staff recommendations with added sign notifications for the eight uses proposed to go from PZC approval to staff level approval. Commissioner's Matters There were none. Planning Matters Mr. Stan Boling stated the likelihood of a meeting on February 22, 2018. Attorney's Matters There were none. Adjournment There being no further business, the meeting adjourned at 9:56 p.m. PZC/Unapproved 8 February 8, 2018 401 FABCC\A11 Comm ittees\P&Z\2018—AGENDAS & MINUTES\PZC 020818.doc PROPOSED REVISIONS TO COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT Comprehensive Plan Coastal Management Element These counterclockwise -rotating, extreme low pressure storms can reach ten miles in height, can spread over several hundred miles in diameter, and can generate winds in excess of 74 miles per hour (MPH), the minimum wind speed necessary to be classified as a hurricane. The official hurricane season extends from June 1 st to November 30th, with 62 percent of all Florida hurricanes occurring during September and October. While extensive rainfall commonly occurs during a hurricane and may cause widespread inland flooding, the greatest danger associated with a hurricane is storm surge. Storm surge can be described as the rise in wave and tidal heights associated with a hurricane. The vulnerability of an area to storm surge is dependent upon the potential height that a storm surge can achieve along a particular coast and the distance to which the surge can penetrate inland upon making landfall. Thus, low-lying coastal topography, such as inlets, beaches and estuaries, are especially susceptible to the destructive forces of a storm surge (Hurricane Manual for Marine Interests in Indian River County). • Coastal High Hazard Area The Coastal High Hazard Area (CHHA) is defined as the area below the storm surge line of a Category 1 hurricane as established by a Sea, Lake, and Overland Surges from Hurricanes (SLOSH) computer model. The CHHA is depicted in figure 9.11. As of 2018, Indian River County has also designated the CHHA as an "Adaptation Action Area" (AAA) in accordance with Section 163.3164(1) F.S and in support of Objective 15 of this Element and its associated policies. An AAA is defined as one or more areas that experience coastal flooding due to extreme high tides and storm surae, and that are vulnerable to the related impacts of rising sea levels for the purpose of prioritizing funding for infrastructure needs and adaptation planning. Within the CHHA, most of the land is designated for residential use, with permitted densities ranging from 3 to 10 units per acre. A substantial portion of this land is currently developed. Much of that development took place at a time when the CHHA was more narrowly defined as land on the barrier island, east of the Coastal Construction Control Line (CCCL). • Hurricane Vulnerability Zone Although many areas are subject to coastal flooding associated with the severe weather of hurricanes, other areas face imminent danger from the storms. Those areas which face severe erosion, flooding, storm surge, or other direct storm related damages from a Category III hurricane constitute the Hurricane Vulnerability Zone (HVZ). The HVZ is depicted in Figure 9.12. This zone has been identified for special planning and evacuation purposes. • Comprehensive Emergency Management Plan In accordance with Chapter 252, F.S., Indian River County has adopted a Comprehensive Emergency Management Plan (CEMP). The CEMP replaces the Peacetime Emergency Plan (PEP), the Florida Community Development Department Indian River County 17 ATTAC H M E N101 Comprehensive Plan Coastal Management Element Line" (D.S.S.L.). Other than approved dune walkovers, minor structures or erosion control projects, construction is not allowed seaward (east) of this regulatory line. Within Indian River County, the Coastal Barrier Resource Act (CoBRA) recognizes and discourages development in two areas: an area south of Ambersand Beach on the northern portion of the barrier island; and an area in the southern portion of the barrier island near the Indian River - St. Lucie County line. Because these relatively undeveloped areas are recognized as having the greatest potential for storm damage, federal flood insurance is unavailable in these areas. Should a Category V storm event occur, much of the barrier island and particularly the areas identified by CoBRA could be completely destroyed. Even with significant measures in place to reduce potential storm damage, hurricanes Francis and Jeanne in 2004 caused wide -spread damage to structures along the beach as well as structures inland. Sea Level Rise Sea level rise (SLR) is typically defined in terms of either global (eustatic) sea level rise or relative sea level rise. Global sea level rise represents the average change in the height of all of Earth's oceans relative to the land. Conversely, relative sea level rise refers to measured changes in sea level height at specific locations on land relative to localized variations in land elevation, including changes due to ocean rise and/or land subsidence. Global sea level rise is directly influenced by fluctuations in the mass or volume of the ocean. Fluctuations in the volume of the ocean are the result of climatological and geological forces such as thermal expansion and contraction, tectonic shift, lift/subsidence. and sedimentation, while ocean mass is affected by factors including melting or accretion rates of glaciers, snow accumulation, and global water storage and redistribution mechanisms. Based on the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Fifth Assessment Report (AR5), many of these climate related phenomena have been directly influenced by greenhouse -gas emissions increases since the pre -industrial era and other feedback mechanisms. With respect to SLR, the IPCC AR5 indicates that global average land and ocean surface temperatures will likely continue to increase and contribute to the acceleration of SLR encountered in the future. In Florida, baseline relative sea level measurements can be derived from historical tide gauge records of mean monthly sea level. In fact, average monthly sea level measurements have been recorded at tide stations located in Key West, Cedar Key, and Fernandina Beach for more than a century. The yearly averages of these historic data, depicted in Figure 9.14 indicate a gradual trend of rising mean sea level between 1897 and 2017. Moreover, these data highlight regional variability that may be observed among local relative sea level datasets. Based on those data sets sea levels at Kew Cedar Key, and Fernandina Beach rose approximately 12.72" 12.66" and 15.63" over the last 100 years. Community Development Department Indian River County4l3 Comprehensive Plan Coastal Management Element Annual mean sea level recorded at Key West, Cedar Key, and Fernandina Beach between 1897 and 2017 4.00 3.30 .00 2 .so 2.00 1.50 FU 1.00 ✓� = 0.50 0.00 A N, Key West Cedar Key Femandina Beach Fieure 9.14: Annual mean sea level recorded at Key West, Cedar Key, and Fernandina Beach between 1897 and 2017. Data obtained from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration National Ocean Service. Regional mapping and vulnerability assessment studies related to sea -level rise (SLR) were initially developed by federal, state, and local government agencies in the early 2000s. Circa 2009, development of consistent regional climate change adaptation strategies became the basis for formation of the Southeast Florida Regional Climate Chane Compact (SFRCCC), which was represented by four coastal counties, Monroe, Miami -Dade, Broward, and Palm -Beach. The SFRCCC created a Unified Sea Level Rise Projection for Southeast Florida in 2011 based on U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Engineering Circulars guidance documents, historical tidal data from Key West (1913-1999), and available scientic literature on the subject at the time. This Unified SLR Projection was later revised in 2015 based on updated guidance documents from USACE, NOAA, and the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) (Figure 9.15). According to the revised moiection the region may experience between 14 and 34 inches of sea level Community Development Department Indian River Count}494 Comprehensive Plan Coastal Management Element so .Unified Sea Level Rise Projection (Southeast Florida Regional Climate Change Compact, 2015) J 70- LLaIPCC ARS , USACE High NOAA High 60 Year Median (inches) (inches) - ? (inches) � H �o= 50 c W 2030 6 10 12 0 40 2060 14 26 34 Cr —v w 2100 31 61 81 —+ 30 s —26" 41 N d L /• c20 t 1_ _ •�' _ 14" _--- CC 10 1992 2000 2010 2020 2030 2040 2050 2060 2070 2080 2090 2100 Year Fieure 9.15: SFRCCC Unified Sea Level Rise Projection (2015). Source: Southeast Florida Regional Climate Change Compact Sea Level Rise Work Group (Compact). October 2015. Unified Sea Level Rise Projection for Southeast Florida. A document prepared for the Southeast Florida Regional Climate Change Compact Steering Committee 35 p Concurrently, the National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Coastal Services Center began development of the web -based SLR and Coastal Flooding Impacts Viewer to aid visualization and adaptation planning efforts for various SLR scenarios. Pilot studies initially_ focused on specific geographic areas along the coasts of Delaware. Mississippi and Alabama; however, the viewer (now called the Sea Level Rise Viewer) has been regularly pdated to include a broad range of coastal areas, including nearly al( of Indian River County east of Interstate 95 (I-95). For informational purposes, Indian River County was included in a similar SLR vulnerabili assessment in 2012 that was coordinated by the Seven50 initiative and the Southeast Florida Regional Partnership, which incorporated methodologies developed by the SFRCCC. The assessment, whose results were presented in the 2013 report "Analysis of the Vulnerability to Sea Level Rise of the Northern SE FL Counties in the Seven50 Planning Region" (Appendix A) evaluated three SLR inundation scenarios (e.g. 1, 2, and 3 feet of inundation) and characterized local geographic areas at potential flood risk due to potential SLR. Baseline land elevation measurements upon which the one foot, two foot, and three foot inundation levels were mapped. were derived from Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR) vertical elevation data that were obtained from the NOAA Coastal Services Center. These data were originally collected in 2007 for the Florida Department of Emergency Management (FDEM). SLR inundation maps depicted flood risks based on two levels of confidence. 80-100% certainty and 20-79.9% certainty, and were categorized as either "more likely" to be inundated or "possibly" inundated, respectively. The local maps presented in the 2013 Seven50 report provided a clear visual comparison of the magnitude of flood -related impacts that may be encountered in Indian River County under 1, 2, and 3 -ft SLR inundation scenarios. Community Development Department Indian River County465 Comprehensive Plan Coastal Management Element Moreover, other data comparisons were evaluated in the analysis including taxable property value rangesimpacted based on inundation level, degree of impacts to higher and lower functional classification roads, and total acres impacted based on future land use designation. Those baseline data provided critical insights for implementation of long range adaptation planningstrategies. trategies. ANALYSIS Land Use This analysis section addresses issues, problems, and opportunities within the coastal zone. A complete analysis of land use data, including a comparison of land use acreages by classification, is contained in the Future Land Use Element of the Comprehensive Plan. In the past, comprehensive plan policies, including the Future Land Use Map, have successfully directed new residential and nonresidential development to designated areas of the county. Consequently, there have been few amendments to the land use map and only minor adjustments to the county's Urban Service Area boundary since the county's current comprehensive plan was adopted in 1990. In fact, the only significant changes to the Future Land Use Map in the previous decade have been amendments designating publicly acquired environmental lands for conservation. Going forward, the major land use issues facing Indian River County in the coastal zone and in the county overall are urban sprawl, rural sprawl, agricultural preservation, and conservation of natural systems within the context of development. Economy Generally, the county's economy is limited in diversity and largely reliant on service oriented industries. Despite this current lack of economic diversity, Indian River County has attractive qualities that certain businesses look for. These qualities, which include an available development - ready supply of land and an exceptional quality of life (warm weather, beaches, minimal population density, resource-based recreational opportunities, etc.), will aid the county as it seeks to increase its economic base in the future. • Eco Tourism A significant aspect of the County's quality of life is its natural resources, not the least of which is the Indian River Lagoon. Resources such as the lagoon provide significant economic benefits to the county. According to the Indian River Lagoon Economic Assessment and Analysis Update (2007), the total economic impact in 2007 of visitors to the Indian River Lagoon in Indian River County was over $110 million. Because of its natural assets, as well as cultural heritage, Indian River County has an opportunity to capitalize on ecotourism. From an economic development standpoint, the County, through its County Environmental Lands Program, is actively preserving some of its greatest natural assets and Community Development Department Indian River County406 Comprehensive Plan Coastal Management Element Indian River Lagoon, the St. Sebastian River, or other surface water bodies, the County's policy should be to promote the connection of waterfront subdivisions to the sanitary sewer system. A complete analysis of sanitary sewer is provided in the Sanitary Sewer Suli-Element. • Stormwater Management Since 1990, stormwater management facilities in the county have been designed to handle a 25 year/24 hour storm event, as well as to provide treatment before discharging stormwater runoff. Because many sections of the county were developed prior to 1990, the level of service for stormwater management facilities continues to vary throughout the county. Over the past several years, the county has made progress in reducing flood hazards by constructing stormwater management projects in certain areas of the county with known flooding problems, including Vero Lake Estates, east Gifford and the Rockridge Subdivision. Moreover, projects such as the Sebastian Stormwater Park and the North Relief Canal Pollution Control Facility, described previously in this report, contribute to improved stormwater quality. Despite implementation of these projects, the county needs to continue to identify, seek funding, and construct new stormwater improvement projects in areas where needed. A more complete analysis of the County's stormwater management facilities is contained in the Stormwater Management Sub -Element. Sea Level Rise Since the completion of the SLR vulnerability assessment in 2012 that was described in the Existing Conditions section, Senate Bill 1094 was enacted, modifying Florida Statute section 163.3178(2)(f) to require, among other provisions, that local governments in Florida "include development and redevelopment principles, strategies, and engineering solutions that reduce the flood risk in coastal areas which results from high -tide events, storm surge, flash floods, stormwater runoff, and the related impacts of sea -level rise" within the coastal management elements of their comprehensive plans. In accordance with this legislation, and based on the best available data from the NOAA Coastal Service Center sea level projection models and best available local projected inundation data, County SLR inundation maps have been incorporated into this Coastal Management Element for planning purposes (Figures 9.16, 9.17, and 9.18). Community Development Department Indian River County467 Comprehensive Plan Coastal Management Element BREVARD COUNT 1� 11" 65TH ST n r. Indian River County Sea Level Rise Inundation, 1 ft - More Likely Possible 1, Source of SLR Inundation Data: NOAA Coastal Services Center. Charleston. SC, 2012. cif ORCHID 5 -69TH-ST 1•�� /` INDIAN RIVER SHORES ` 53RD ST o � --,• r IAL ,, 11 —.-41STST_ \BEACH – 20TH ST 4TH ST, �j 9TH _STSW \` s 0 1 2 3Miles \ A IRC Environmental Planning 12/18/2017 S T. L U C'1 E COUNTY Figure 9.16: 1 -Foot Sea Level Rise Scenario in Indian River County, FL Community Development Department Indian River Count3408 Comprehensive Plan Coastal Management Element BREVARD COUNT A I 1 � � j0 '. 0 T.1 IL / SEBASTIAN Q ORCHID 0 h _ 85TH ST 1a Indian River County Sea Level Rise Inundation, 2 ft - More Likely Possible Source of SLR Inundation Data: NOAA Coastal Services Center, Charleston, SC, 2012. 1- 1 t � 5 69TH Sr 31' INDIAN RIVER 1 SHORES 53RD ST c r ` -'.41ST ST \Ro I io' BEACH V�J 20TH ST 11 - - - •- N � 1_• 1' ATH ST„ 1'.... �. 9TH STSW ^, 0 1 2 3 Miles ` a a IRC Environmental Planning 12/18/2017 ` ST. LUCIE COUNTY Figure 9.17: 2 -Foot Sea Level Rise Scenario in Indian River County, FL Community Development Department Indian River County489 Comprehensive Plan Coastal Management Element BREVARD COUNT 1 � t ^� �= Indian River County Sea Level Rise Y �i I " Inundation, 3 ft " f A `�. More Likely Possible Source of SLR Inundation Data: NOAA Coastal Services Center, Charleston. SC. 2012. Y SEBASTIAN; ORCHID .45TH ST 510 69TH ST i 1 a INDIAN RIVER SHORES Lid a m` 53RD ST o ,:.ew V i VERO\, 4 BEACH: 20TH ST `-4• 4TH ST,co, 9TH ST SW 1 � e 0 1 2 3 Miles �� e IRC Environmental Planning 1 2/1 81201 7 \ ST' L U C I E'C O U N T Y rj Figure 9.18: 3 -Foot Sea Level Rise Scenario in Tndian Rivar rnnn1 FL Community Development Department Indian River County40 Comprehensive Plan Coastal Management Element Table 9.4: Revised Sea Level Rise Inundation Estimates for Indian River County Florida* Probability lft Inundation 2ft Inundation 3ft Inundation Category Area (in Sq. Area (in Sq. Area (in Sq. Miles) Miles) Miles Possible 5.95 6.95 6.05 More Likely 0.90 2.84 6.54 Probability Cate o Acres Acres Acres Possible 3,809.97 4,447.07 3,871.39 More Likely 575.53 1,814.65 4,187.81 *Source: NOAA Coastal Services Center, Charleston, S.C., 2012, and Indian River County Environmental Planning, 2017. Note: The geographic areas within the probability categories "Possible" and "More Likely" do not overlap. Inundation Risk by Land Use The total land use area at risk from each SLR inundation scenario was analvzed. When evaluated based on total acres inundated, the data indicate that under all three inundation scenarios theerg impacts of SLR are on lands designated Conservation and Recreation. Notably, privately owned estuarine wetlands and undeveloped lagoon island conservation areas appear to bg the most vulnerable to SLR inundation impacts. It is estimated that more than 85% of currently existing coastal wetlands are at risk of inundation under the 3 foot sea level rise scenario. Physical infrastructure such as roadways, power plants, ports and airports landfills hospitals and schools were determined to be critical facilities that were initially evaluated in the 2013 Seven50 report. Based on the best available data from the NOAA Coastal Service Center sea level projection models, risks to physical infrastructure at the one, two and three foot scenarios are described below. • Indian River County has 4 airports east of I-95. No impacts were reported. • FPL has seven parcels under the category of Electrical Power Substation. The Cily o Vero Beach has nine. No impacts were reported. • FEC Railroad rights of way were assessed but did not show a vulnerabili , to sea level rise (no miles of track impacted). • The water and wastewater treatment plant analysis included the Indian River Wastewater and Water Treatment facilities. Significant impacts may be encountered at facilities located along the Indian River Lagoon which incorporate coastal mosquito impoundments and estuarine marshes. • Indian River County has 2 parcels under the data category of landfills No impacts were reported. Community Development Department Indian River CountY444 Comprehensive Plan Coastal Management Element • Hospital facilities are mainly concentrated in Vero Beach. Under the 2 and 3 foot scenarios approximately 6.8 and 16.5 acres of inundation, respectively, could be possible on the Indian River Medical Center parcel'. Impacts were to undeveloped portions of the parcel and no building infrastructure would be affected. • The Indian River County Schools include five charter schools, eight public schools, 1 I private schools and Indian River Community College. Fourteen total schools are designated as storm shelters. None of these were impacted at any scenario. • Evacuation Routes to and from the barrier islands were not shown to be vulnerable to sea level rise at the three scenarios tested. 'Note: the currently undeveloped and unelevated east end of the overall IRMC parcel could be impacted under the scenarios tested. Mitigation and adaptation strategies Based on the analysis provided in this element, the majority of the inundation impacts are projected to occur within the Coastal High Hazard Area (CHHA); consequently, mitigation strategies that will likely have the greatest effect on reducing exposure to inundation risk due to one foot, two foot and three foot SLR scenarios involve reducing the potential population and vulnerable development within the CHHA. Therefore, the CHHA area should be used as an "Adaptation Action Area" (AAA) to implement strategies that address sea level rise impacts. Strategies that accomplish these objectives include reducing_ public infrastructure expenditures in at risk areas identified on the inundation maps, preventing or capping the number of assisted living facilities and similar special needs populations and higher density developments within the CHHA/AAA, and acquiring conservation and open space lands in the CHHA/AAA when feasible. Future adaptation strategies may include relocation and/or elevation of critical infrastructure facilities and roadways where appropriate, incorporation of living shorelines that provide coastal resilience and carbon sequestration benefits, and improvements to stormwater conveyance systems that may be susceptible to failure as a result of rising_ groundwater and tide levels. Additionally saltwater intrusion will be ar� owing concern based on the cumulative effects of projected potential SLR inundation and rising_ groundwater levels. Community Development Department Indian River CountY442 Comprehensive Plan Coastal Management Element Policy 13.2: The county, in cooperation with the FWC, USFWS, FIND, and the ELC, will distribute manatee awareness and boating safety materials to local boaters at the time of yearly boat registration and other appropriate locations such as marinas, bait and tackle shops, and public parks. Policy 13_3: By 2010, the county shall initiate a monofilament line recycling program by placing marked collection receptacles at boat ramps, marinas, bridges, and strategic locations. Policy 13.4: All existing and new boat facilities (public and private) shall be required to post manatee awareness signs. Policy 13.5: By 2010, all rental vessels, including personal watercraft, in Indian River County shall be required to display stickers or plasticized cards with boating safety and manatee protection information. OBJECTIVE 14 Manatee Protection Measures Through 2015, the annual number of manatee mortalities in Indian River County shall be no more than five (5), excluding unusual events such as red tide or disease outbreaks. Of these annual mortalities, no more than one (1) mortality shall be watercraft -related. Policy 14.1: The county, in cooperation with the City of Vero Beach Utilities Department and the FWC Bureau of Protected Species Management will ensure that disruptions to outflow, and/or inadequate temperatures to sustain manatees during winter are minimized, and that all necessary precautions to minimize hazards at the power plant are initiated. Policy 14.2: The county shall continue to assist the Indian River Mosquito Control District to identify and retrofit any remaining culverts or pipes that pose a threat of manatee entrapment. OBJECTIVE 15 Sea Level Rise Adaptation Strategies Through 2060, the County shall adopt, implement, and pursue strategies that increase community resiliency and protect property, infrastructure, and cultural and natural resources from the impacts of sea level rise. Policy 15.1: By 2022, Public properties and infrastructure, including but not limited to water and wastewater facilities, stormwater systems, roads, bridges, governmental buildings hospitals, coastal wetlands, transit infrastructure and other public assets that may be at risk to sea level rise impacts shall be identified. Based on risk inventory findings resilience improvements and relocation of infrastructure shall be considered as part of capital improvement plans, where warranted. Policy 15.2: During major evaluations and overall updates to the comprehensive plan the best available data and sea level rise projections such as those made by the United States Army Corps of Engineers, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Association, and the Southeast Florida Community Development Department Indian River County4o Comprehensive Plan Coastal Management Element Regional Climate Change Compact, shall be taken into consideration when evaluating or updating policies related to sea level rise. Policy 15.3: Beginning in 2022, and every 5 years thereafter, the County shall review the best available data on local sea level rise projections and County sea level rise inundation maps and shall update inundation maps and related analysis, as warranted. Policy 15.4: The County shall coordinate with local municipalities regarding sea level rise adaptation and mitigation measures. Policy 15.5: The County herebypts the Coastal High Hazard Area (CHHA) as an "Adaptation Action Area" (AAA) as defined in this Coastal Management Element to identify the geographic areas most vulnerable to the impacts of projected potential sea level rise and most appropriate for mitigation measures and resiliency improvements. Furthermore, the County shall apply this Element's Objective 5 CHHA policies to limit public infrastructure expenditures within the AAA. Policy 15.6: By 2023, the County shall re-evaluate flood zone requirements and mitigation strategies within the AAA. Policy 15.7: The Count shall hall prohibit location within the AAA of new adult congregate living facilities, nursing homes, and other similar facilities that serve special needs populations. Policy 15.8: No increase in land use designation density shall be approved by the Count properties that lie within the AAA. PLAN IMPLEMENTATION An important part of any plan is its implementation. Implementation involves execution of the plan's policies by taking actions and achieving results. For the Coastal Management Element, implementation involves various activities. While some of these actions will be ongoing, others are activities that will be taken by certain points in time. For each policy in this element, Table 9.4 identifies the type of action required, the entity or entities responsible for taking the action, the timing, and whether or not the policy necessitates a capital expenditure. To implement the Coastal Management Element, several types of action must be taken. These include, but are not limited to: coordination with jurisdictional and reviewing agencies, establishing marina facilities siting criteria, and protecting/preserving estuarine resources. Overall plan implementation responsibility will rest with the Community Development Department. Besides its responsibilities as identified in Table 9.4, the Community Development Department has the additional responsibility of ensuring that other entities discharge their responsibilities. This will entail notifying other applicable departments of capital expenditures to be included in their budgets, Community Development Department Indian River County4464 PROPOSED REVISION TO FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT POLICY 17.5 OBJECTIVE 17: COASTAL POPULATION Through 2030, the county will have no increase in land use designation density or intensity within the Coastal High Hazard Area. Policy 17.1: The county shall not approve plan amendments that increase the residential density or land use intensity within the Coastal High Hazard Area. Polio: The county shall support programs of land acquisition on the barrier island for natural resource preservation, recreation or both. Polio: The county shall limit densities in the coastal high hazard area to ensure timely evacuation of the barrier island. Policy 17.4: The county shall prohibit new development of adult congregate living facilities, nursing homes, homes for the aged, total care facilities, and similar developments within the Coastal High Hazard Area. Policy 1717.5: The county hereby adopts the Coastal High Hazard Area boundary depicted on the county's Future Land Use Map. As set forth in Coastal Management Element Policy 15.5, the Coastal High Hazard Area is designated as an Adaptation Action Area (AAA) as defined in the Coastal Management Element, subject to the policies of this Objective 17 and of Coastal Management Element Objective 15 which include density and land use restrictions. ATTACHMENT 5 C:\Users\legistar\AppData\Local\Temp\BCL Technologies\easyPDF 8\@BCL@080E37BA\@BCL@080E37BA.docx 415 Comprehensive Plan Coastal Manazement Element The county shall require dune cross-over structures for all new public and private tit desiring beach access. The county shall not approve plans which do not include oved dune cross-over structures at beach access points. Policy 4. dian River County shall protect and preserve natural beach and dune systems by adopting the ecific criteria for shoreline stabilization within the unincorporated portion of Indian River Cob4br and within the municipal limits of the city of Vero Beach, as outlined in Policy 10.5 of the Npservation Element. Policy 4.7: The county s continue to prohibit motorized vehicles on the beach/dune area, except for vehicles engag n emergency activities, permitted government vehicles and permitted vehicles associated w1kapproved construction, restoration and/or scientific projects. Policy 4.8: The. county shall enforN, its beach and duneprotection land development regulations by requiring mitigation or reNation of dune disturbances, and imposing fines as warranted in association with code violatio Policy 4.9: County staff will attend meetings held the Sebastian Inlet Tax District, and will participate in evaluating technical studies prepared b e District. Policy 4.10: The county shall continue to monitor the PE\Departm he effects of the reef on shoreline stabilization. Poli4.11: The county shall continue to study alternativestabilization for the areas of critical erosion identified in the 2008 FlorEnvironmental Protection's Critically Eroded Beaches in Florida report. Polie4.12: The county shall assist the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation\dataas (FWC) and the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) in the d a Florida -wide Habitat Conservation Plan for coastal beaches by providing loc turtle nesting, erosion events, potential coastal mitigation sites, and other coast be requested by the FWC and DEP. OBJECTIVE 5 Limiting Public Expenditures in the Coastal High -Hazard Area Through 2030, there will be no expansion of infrastructure within the Coastal High Hazard Area (CHHA) other than that which is deemed necessary to maintain existing levels -of -service. Policy 5.1: The county hereby designates the "Coastal High -Hazard Area" (CHHA) as the area below the storm surge line of a category 1 hurricane, as established by a Sea, Lake, and Overland Surges from Hurricanes (SLOSH) computer model. The CHHA shall be depicted on the County's Future Land Use Map. Figure 9.11 of this element is hereby adopted as the county's CHHA designation map. Community Development Department Indian River County Al 6 Comprehensive Plan Coastal Management Element Policy 5.2: The county shall not subsidize public facilities within the CHHA, other than those which are deemed necessary to maintain existing level -of -service standards, and those which are directly related to public access and/or resource management. Furthermore, the county shall adopt Objective 2 and its associated policies of the Capital Improvements Element. Policy 5.3: Following a storm event, the Public Works Department shall assess all county facilities in the CHHA that were damaged, and shall make recommendations to reduce future expenditures and potential damage risks. In addition, the Public Works Department shall conduct a cost/benefit analysis to evaluate the relocation of storm damaged infrastructure or infrastructure which is repeatedly threatened by potential storm damage. Policy 5.4: The county shall maintain, at a minimum, a Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Community Rating System (CRS) classification of "6" by continuing to enforce LDR Chapter 934 - Stormwater Management and Flood Protection, and by evaluating structures for compliance with, the FEMA's 50°lo Rule, as described in Policies 7.4 and 7.5 of this Element. JECTIVE 6 Reduction of Hurricane Evacuation Times of Reduce Public Risk Throu 2424, Indian River County will maintain an estimated evacuation time of 12 hours or less for a telory III hurricane. Policy 6.1: e county hereby designates the "Hurricane Vulnerability Zone" (HVZ), as described in th reasure Coast Regional Planning Council's Hurricane Evacuation Study (1988 update), as ea ofthe county subject to being inundated by a Category Ill or greater hurricane. {Ref. Figure 12) Poligy 6_2: The county wi continue to monitor existing schools, municipally -owned buildings, and county -owned b in to identify those buildings that are appropriately designed and located to serve as hu ane evacuation shelters. The county will solicit state funding for retrofitting primary shelters increase hurricane -proofing of such structures as warranted. Policy 6.3: To ensure that all new developt ithin the CHHA incorporate hazard mitigation techniques, such as dedication of er=gene cesses, the county shall continue to assess the vulnerability ofpublic infrastructure, private res ces, and businesses within the CHHA through the County's inter -departmental developmen view process. Policy 6.4: Indian River County shall continue to coordinate with the asure Coast Regional Planning Council (TCRPC), Brevard County and St. Lucie County cog evacuation routes and populations involved to assess the impact of regional growth onV evacuation times. Policy 6.5: To maintain current evacuation times, the county shall implement Objective\tdSf the Coastal Management Element and Objective 17 of the Future Land Use Element and Community Development Department Indian River County J17 Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element a n will be evaluated and updated annually to reflect existing and future public school facility needs o t e 1 ensure that the Indian River County School District Five -Year Facilities Work Plan is financially feast e ted level -of -service standard for public schools is achieved and maintained. ...> Obiective 2: Development in Coastal High Hazard Areas Through 2030, development in coastal high hazard areas will not increase beyond the density or intensity levels indicated on the current Future Land Use Map. Policy 2. 1: The coastal high hazard area is defined as the area of the county designated as evacuation zones for a category one hurricane. Policy 2.2: The county shall not increase land use density and intensity, in the coastal high hazard area, beyond that reflected in the county's current Future Land Use Map. Polio: The county shall make appropriations for infrastructure in coastal high hazard areas only to maintain the adopted level -of -service standards. Policy 2.4: The county shall ensure that the replacement of infrastructure in the coastal high hazard area will be limited to maintaining the adopted level -of -service standards. Policy 2.5: The county shall require that all developments and all single-family units in coastal high hazard areas fully pay the cost for required infrastructure improvements through impact fees, capacity charges, developer dedications, assessments, and contributions. Polio The county shall not use public funds to subsidize increased density or intensity of urban development in coastal high hazard areas; however, public beach, shoreline access, resource restoration, or similar projects may be constructed. Through 2030, adop els-of-service will be maintained for all concurrency facilities. Policy 3. 1: The county hereby adopts t 'eo •rency management system as described within this element. The county shall maintain LandDe ent Regulation (LDR) Chapter 910, Concurrency Management System, which implements the plan rrency management system. In accordance with the concurrency management system of this plan and 910, the county will not approve any development project where the impacts of such a project woul e existing level -of -service on any facility below that facility's adopted minimum level -of -service stan Community Development Department Adopted December 2, 2014, Ordinance 2014-020 Indian River County 53 418 RESOLUTION NO. 2018- A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, APPROVING THE TRANSMITTAL OF PROPOSED INDIAN RIVER COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TEXT AMENDMENTS TO STATE AND REGIONAL REVIEW AGENCIES. WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners adopted the Indian River County Comprehensive Plan on February 13, 1990, and WHEREAS, the county received comprehensive plan amendment applications during its October 2017 amendment submittal window, and WHEREAS, the Local Planning Agency, after due public notice, held a public hearing on these comprehensive plan amendment requests on February 8, 2018, and WHEREAS, the Local Planning Agency, after receiving public comments, made a recommendation to the Board of County Commissioners; and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners held a Transmittal Public Hearing on March 20, 2018, after due public notice; and WHEREAS, The Board of County Commissioners announced at the transmittal public hearing its intention to hold and advertise a final public hearing at the adoption stage of the plan amendment process. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA THAT: 1. The above recitals are ratified in their entirety. 2. The following proposed amendments are approved for transmittal to State and Regional Review Agencies (Appendices A and B): FACommunity Development\Comprehensive Plan Text Amendments\2017 Sewer Policy Update\Agenda Items\PH #2 - BCC Transmittal Review\Attachment 6 - Transmittal Text Resolution March 2018 - With Appendices.doc 1 of 3 Attachment 7 419 RESOLUTION NO. 2018 - AN ORDINANCE OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AMENDING THE TEXT OF THE SANITARY SEWER SUB -ELEMENT FOR SEPTIC TO SEWER CONVERSION AND THE ASSOCIATED TEXT OF THE FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT OF THE COUNTY'S COMPREHENSIVE PLAN; AND PROVIDING CODIFICATION, SEVERABILITY, AND EFFECTIVE DATE; AND AN ORDINANCE OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AMENDING THE TEXT OF THE COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT FOR SEA LEVEL RISE AND ASSOCIATED TEXT OF THE FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT OF THE COUNTY'S COMPREHENSIVE PLAN; AND PROVIDING CODIFICATION, SEVERABILITY, AND EFFECTIVE DATE. The forgoing Resolution was offered by Commissioner and seconded by Commissioner and upon being put to a vote, the vote was as follows: Peter D. O'Bryan, Chairman Bob Solari, Vice Chairman Joseph E. Flescher, Commissioner Timothy Zorc, Commissioner Susan Adams, Commissioner The Chairman thereupon declared the resolution duly passed and adopted at a public hearing held this 20th day of March 2018. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA Peter D. O'Bryan, Chairman ATTEST: Jeffrey R. Smith, Clerk of Circuit Court and Comptroller APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGAL SUFFICIENCY William K. DeBraal, Deputy County Attorney FACommunity Development\Comprehensive Plan Text Amendments\2017 Sewer Policy Update\Agenda Items\PH #2 - BCC Transmittal Review\Attachment 6 - Transmittal Text Resolution March 2018 - With Appendices.doc 2of3 420 RESOLUTION NO. 2018 - APPROVED AS TO PLANNING MATTERS Stan Boling, AICP Community Development Director FACommunity Development\Comprehensive Plan Text Amendments\2017 Sewer Policy Update\Agenda Items\PH #2 - BCC Transmittal Review\Attachment 6 - Transmittal Text Resolution March 2018 - With Appendices.doc 3 of 3 421 Indian River County 2030 Comprehensive Plan AI d A A Indian River County Community Development Department Adopted: October 12, 2010 Supplement # ; Adopted , 2018, Ordinance 2018-. Appeix A TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION.......................................................................................................................... 1 PURPOSE................................................................................................................................... 1 DEFINITIONS................................................................................................................................ 2 BACKGROUND............................................................................................................................ 4 HISTORY................................................................................................................................... 4 COUNTY UTILITIES DEPARTMENT.................................................................................... 4 CENTRALIZED REGIONAL SYSTEM................................................................................... 5 EXISTINGCONDITIONS............................................................................................................. 8 SANITARY SEWER PROCESS............................................................................................... 8 Collection................................................................................................................................ 8 Treatment................................................................................................................................ 8 By -Product Disposal............................................................................................................... 9 PUBLICSEWER SYSTEM....................................................................................................... 9 South Regional Sewer Service Area..................................................................................... 10 West Sewer Service Area...................................................................................................... 11 Central Sewer Service Area.................................................................................................. 12 North Sewer Service Area.................................................................................................... 13 City of Vero Beach Sewer Service Area............................................................................... 14 Finance.................................................................................................................................. 16 PRIVATE SEWER SYSTEMS................................................................................................ 18 SEPTICSYSTEMS.................:................................................................................................ 19 Septic to Sewer Study: Evaluation and Ranking...................................................................... 23 REGULATORY FRAMEWORK................................................................................................ 25 FEDERAL................................................................................................................................. 25 STATE...................................................................................................................................... 25 LOCAL..................................................................................................................................... 26 ANALYSIS................................................................................................................................... 27 COLLECTIONSYSTEM......................................................................................................... 27 ServiceArea.......................................................................................................................... 27 System Evaluation and Maintenance.................................................................................... 28 Service to New Development............................................................................................... 29 SepticSystems...................................................................................................................... 30 TREATMENT.......................................................................................................................... 35 Public Treatment Plants........................................................................................................ 35 PrivateTreatment Plants....................................................................................................... 39 EFFLUENTDISPOSAL.......................................................................................................... 39 SUMMARYOF ANALYSIS................................................................................................... 40 GOAL, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES...................................................................................... 41 GOAL....................................................................................................................................... 41 Community Development Department Indian River County i Appex A OBJECTIVE 1 Service Concurrent with Development ........................... OBJECTIVE 2 Regional System Expansion/Correction of Deficiencies OBJECTIVE 3 Surface Water and Groundwater Quality ........................ OBJECTIVE 4 Water Conservation........................................................ .................... 41 .................... 42 .................... 43 .................... 43 OBJECTIVE 5 Capital Improvements............................................................................... 44 OBJECTIVE 6 Package Treatment Plants......................................................................... 46 OBJECTIVE 7 Septic Systems.......................................................................................... 48 PLAN IMPLEMENTATION....................................................................................................... 50 EVALUATION AND MONITORING PROCEDURES........................................................ :.... 54 Community Development Department Indian River County ii Apperx A LIST OF FIGURES Figure 3.A.1 Indian River County WWTF Service Areas... Figure 3.A.2 WWTF Capacity vs. Demand Community Development Department 0 .......................................... 37 Indian River County iii Appex A LIST OF TABLES TABLE 3.A.1 - SANITARY SEWER FACILITIES IN INDIAN RIVER COUNTY* ............... 7 TABLE 3.A.2 - COUNTY REGIONAL WASTEWATER TREATMENT SYSTEMS ............ 15 TABLE 3.A.3 - INDIAN RIVER COUNTY SUBDIVISIONS WITH INCREASED HEALTH RISKS AND/OR INCREASED PROBABILITY OF GROUNDWATER CONTAMINATION ASSOCIATED WITH CONTINUED SEPTIC TANK SYSTEM USE ...................................... 22 TABLE 3.A.3.1 - INDIAN RIVER COUNTY LIST OF SUBDIVISIONS FOR SEPTIC TO SEWER CONVERSION WITHIN UNINCORPORATED COUNTY AND CITY OF SEBASTIAN................................................................................................................................. 24 TABLE 3.A.4 - REGULATION OF SEWAGE.......................................................................... 26 TABLE 3.A.5 - TYPICAL CONCENTRATIONS FOR HOUSEHOLD WASTEWATER, SEPTIC TANK EFFLUENT AND WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT EFFLUENT ..... 31 TABLE 3.A.6 - SANITARY SEWER SUB -ELEMENT IMPLEMENTATION MATRIX....... 51 TABLE 3.A.7 - SANITARY SEWER SUB -ELEMENT EVALUATION MATRIX ................ 55 TABLE 3.A.8 - WATER & WASTEWATER CONNECTION MATRIX FOR NEW DEVELOPMENT......................................................................................................................... 56 Community Development Department Indian River County iv AppelAx A INTRODUCTION Wastewater is a term used to describe water leaving a site as sewage. Generally, this includes water from the kitchen and bathroom sinks, toilets, dishwashers, clothes washers, and bath tubs/showers. Each day, every person within Indian River County produces an average of 100 gallons of wastewater. This wastewater has three possible destinations. First, it may enter an on-site sewage treatment and disposal system OSTDS , usually a septic tank followed by a drainfield, where it receives a minimum level of treatment. Second, it may go to a private sewage treatment plant, generally located near the dwelling unit or other structure. Private treatment plants usually provide a greater degree of treatment than septic systems. The third possible destination for wastewater is a regional treatment plant. Such regional plants may be located many miles from the structure where wastewater is generated. These plants generally provide a consistently greater degree of treatment than either septic systems or private plants. Wastewater treatment systems are comprised of three components; these are collection, treatment, and disposal. The importance of each of these three components varies with the type of wastewater system. This document will address the collection, treatment, and disposal characteristics of septic systems, private treatment plants, and regional treatment systems. PURPOSE The purpose of the Sanitary Sewer Sub -Element is to: • identify existing and projected demand and need (demand - supply = need) for sanitary sewer facilities based on the county's population, existing and future land use, capacity of existing facilities and any future changes to these facilities; • identify the operational responsibilities, geographic service areas and levels of service provided by each facility; • identify those areas where public sewer will and will not be provided; and • identify environmentally sound methods of disposing of treated wastes and sludge from treatment plants. This sub -element will provide direction for the county in planning for the collection, treatment, and disposal of wastewater in a manner consistent with federal, state and local laws. In addition, the Sanitary Sewer Sub -Element will identify proposed locations and levels of service of sanitary sewer facilities. Finally, this element will establish sanitary sewer policies that complement the county's future land use pattern and serve as a means of directing future growth in the county. Community Development Department Indian River County 1 AppWdix A DEFINITIONS Wastewater means untreated sewage. Effluent means the liquid by-product of the wastewater treatment process. Wastewater Collection Network means the system of pipes which convey the untreated wastewater from individual homes and other establishments to the treatment plant. Wastewater Interceptors are defined as parts of the collection system which connect directly to and convey sewage to the treatment plant. Wastewater Trunk Mains are components of the collection system which connect directly to and convey sewage to the interceptors through a gravity system. Pump Stations are mechanical devices used to pump sewage through the collection network (force mains) for the purpose of transporting the untreated wastewater to the treatment plant. Force Main means a pressurized segment of the collection system. Wastewater Treatment Plant means the facility which functions to remove solid and organic materials from the wastewater. Wastewater Treatment Process is the means by which solid and organic materials are removed from the untreated wastewater. Level of Wastewater Treatment is defined by the proportion of solid and organic materials removed from the wastewater. The most common levels of treatment are: primary, secondary, and tertiary. Primary Treatment removes between 30 and 35 percent of the organic material and up to 50 percent of the solids from the sewage. Because screens and settling tanks are the most common methods used to remove the solids, this process is also referred to as physical treatment. Secondary Treatment removes between 80 and 90 percent of the total organic material and suspended solids from the sewage. This level of treatment generally requires multiple steps involving one biological process and one or more physical processes for removal of suspended solids. Tertiary Treatment is a level of wastewater treatment which removes the organic material and suspended solids, synthetic organic compounds and inorganic chemicals. If not removed, these agents may cause pollution problems. Tertiary treatment adds steps to the primary and secondary processes which will remove these pollutants. The most common tertiary processes Community Development Department Indian River County 2 Appdix A remove compounds of phosphorus and nitrogen. The effluent from advanced treatment processes often approaches the quality of drinking water. Septic Systems are small scale wastewater treatment systems consisting of two components. Those components are typically a septic tank where solids settle out and biological action occurs, and a drainfield where the remaining liquid is discharged and further treated. Septic systems provide a minimal level of wastewater treatment. Regional Wastewater Treatment Systems are large scale sanitary sewer systems comprised of three components: collection of raw sewage; treatment of the sewage; and the disposal of the treated sludge and effluent. Package Wastewater Treatment Plants are small treatment systems designed and built in modular units and having components similar to larger regional treatment facilities. Infiltration means water, other than wastewater, that enters a sewer system (including sewer service connections and foundation drains) from the ground through such means as defective pipes, pipe joints, connections or manholes. Inflow means water, other than wastewater, that enters a sewer system (including sewer service connections) from sources such as, but not limited to, roof leaders, cellar drains, yard drains, area drains, drains from springs and swampy areas, manhole covers, cross connections between storm sewers and sanitary sewers, catch basins, cooling towers, storm waters, surface runoff, street wash waters or drainage. Community Development Department Indian River County 3 Appfdix A BACKGROUND An important aspect of wastewater or sanitary sewer planning involves examining existing conditions. Prior to that, however, it is helpful to consider the background or history of the wastewater system in the county. That provides a perspective regarding county policy on this matter. Instead of a static view of current conditions as the existing conditions section provides, the background section identifies recent trends in this area. HISTORY A review of recent history shows that Indian River County has owned and operated sanitary sewer facilities for only a relatively short time. Prior to the 1970's, the use of centralized facilities which provide the highest level of treatment and efficiency was limited to the densest and most intensely developed urban areas of the county. Those areas were located within or adjacent to the City of Vero Beach. While centralized sewer service has been available to the City of Vero Beach since 1926, the rest of the county did not have access to such service until the late 1970's. In the past, the use of privately owned sewer facilities provided the county with an alternative to publicly owned, centralized sewer services. Private sewer facilities are operated by private companies which are given the authority to provide wastewater service to specified areas. Most private wastewater systems provide service only to an individual subdivision or development. Prior to the establishment of the County Utilities Department in 1972, the regulation of wastewater facilities rested with several state and federal agencies and often focused on the permitting of new and the expansion of existing treatment facilities. By 1972, the regulatory agencies were becoming more intent on discouraging the use of individual septic tanks and small package systems. COUNTY UTILITIES DEPARTMENT Authorized to develop procedures and standards for utilities in the county, the County Utilities Department also issues utility permits. Initially formed to regulate privately owned utility systems, the Utilities Department was also charged with establishing a countywide utilities system. At the time that the utility department was created, centralized sewer services in the county were provided by the City of Vero Beach, by private utility companies, and by private systems serving individual buildings and developments. A majority of residential developments in the unincorporated county, however, relied on individual septic tanks for wastewater treatment and disposal. In 1973, a master sewage plan was developed for the county. That plan identified the need for publicly owned and operated regional facilities to protect the public health and prosperity of the community. The plan outlined proposed service areas in the eastern portion of the county as well Community Development Department Indian River County 4 AppMix A as the necessary facilities and capitalization required to implement the plan. The plan also recommended eventually incorporating private sewer treatment facilities into the county system. Also in 1973, the County and the City of Vero Beach entered into an agreement regarding the provision of sanitary sewer services. This agreement established boundaries for areas in the county that would receive services from the city. CENTRALIZED REGIONAL SYSTEM The county's first direct provision of wastewater treatment services took place in 1978, as the result of problems at two private sewer systems. The Gifford system (later to be known as the Central Plant) and Ixora Park facilities had experienced system failures that resulted in the release of raw sewage into the surrounding areas. Because of these problems and their environmental impacts, the County Utilities Department assumed responsibility for the operation of these plants. The Central Plant has since been expanded, while the Ixora plant has been decommissioned. In 1982, county wastewater services expanded when the Utilities Department took over the operation of the Vista Royale and Vista Royale Gardens plants in the southern part of the county. This expansion continued with construction of the West Regional Wastewater Treatment Plant which began operation in 1986. Located south of SR 60 and east of I-95, the West Regional Plant provides wastewater service for the rapidly growing SR 60 Corridor area. In the early 1990's, the County took over. the operation and the maintenance of the Blue Cypress Lake Package Wastewater Treatment Facility. Utilities system expansion continued in the 1990's. In 1990, the county completed construction of the North County Plant. Then, the County acquired the South County Plant from General Development Utilities in 1993. In 1995, the county purchased the City of Sebastian's utilities system. In 1987, Indian River County adopted a Wastewater Master Plan which has been updated several times since then, most recently in December 2004. That plan identified a system of wastewater treatment facilities to accommodate the anticipated growth of the county. The Master Plan identifies five sewer service areas. Those areas are North, West, Central, South, and City of Vero Beach. One publicly owned and operated regional wastewater treatment plant exists within each of the five service areas. In addition to public facilities, septic tanks systems and private treatment facilities currently exist and will continue to exist in the county. —Table 3.A.1 lists existing wastewater treatment plants in Indian River County with their capacity and service area. Community Development Department Indian River County 5 Appdix A Figure 3.A.1 Indian River County WWTF Service Areas Community Development Department Indian River County 6 App!Wdix A r MZ .. rn rn j{{q�� ... .rr gone 9 ►r.i.�f i �.i h� WOMME OrW V CIRS -''1`' Community Development Department Indian River County 6 App!Wdix A TABLE 3.A.1 - SANITARY SEWER FACILITIES IN INDIAN RIVER COUNTY* * Excludes private permitted Industrial Waste Water facilities SOURCE: Indian River County Utilities Department Community Development Department Indian River County Appdix A PUBLIC PACKAGE SERVICE AREA DESIGN CAPACITY IN OR OPERATING OR GALLONS/DAY FACILITY PRIVATE ENTITY REGIONAL 1. North public IRC regional North of 77' Street to North County 850,000 County Line & North Barrier Island 2. Central public IRC regional 26' Street and Vero Beach City limits 4,000,000 County to 691" Street 3. West public IRC regional South of 261 Street and west of City of 6,000,000 County Vero Beach 4. S. County public IRC regional Southeast mainland 2,000,000 5. Vero public Vero Beach regional Vero Beach, Ind. Riv. Shores, S. Barrier 4,500,000 Beach Island 6. Blue public IRC package Blue Cypress Improvement Dist. 17.00024," Cypress 7. Sun -Ag private Sun -Ag Co. package Sun -Ag Mobile Home Park near 50,000 MHP Fellsmere 8. Sun -Ag private Sun -Ag Co. package Sun -Ag Packinghouse near Fellsmere 2,500 Packing- house 9. Su -Rene Mobile private Su -Rene package Su -Rene Mobile Home Park 5,000 Horne Park 10. Royal Oak private Royal Oak package Royal Oak Mobile Home Park 5,000 Mobile Home Park * Excludes private permitted Industrial Waste Water facilities SOURCE: Indian River County Utilities Department Community Development Department Indian River County Appdix A EXISTING CONDITIONS In assessing existing conditions, it is necessary to address the sanitary sewer system on several levels. First, it is necessary to differentiate among the various types of systems in the county. This involves separate consideration of the publicly -owned sewer systems, the privately -owned sewer systems, and individual septic systems. Second, it is necessary to identify individual service areas for both the public system and private systems. Finally, it is necessary to assess each type of system and service area in terms of collection, treatment, and disposal. SANITARY SEWER PROCESS Within the county, there are various sanitary sewer systems and service areas. Although specific aspects of the sanitary sewer process vary with the type of system, certain characteristics are the same, regardless of system type. Collection Once wastewater is generated by residences, businesses, industries, and other land uses, it is then conveyed from an individual establishment to a wastewater treatment plant by the collection network. Alternatively, the wastewater may go to an individual septic tank for on-site treatment. Where a centralized system is involved, however, the collection network is generally laid out in a pattern roughly comparable to the branching pattern of a tree. Whereas the smallest sewer pipes connect individual establishments to components of the collection system called trunk mains and interceptors, interceptors and trunk mains connect with and convey wastewater directly to the treatment plant. Treatment After being collected, wastewater is processed by a wastewater treatment plant. Presently, both Indian River County and the City of Vero Beach maintain regional wastewater treatment plants. In addition to those five regional facilities, there are four private package wastewater treatment facilities and the one public package treatment facility (the Blue Cypress Lake wastewater treatment plant) in the county. The existing wastewater treatment plants use a variety of methods to treat wastewater. Once at the treatment plant, the wastewater is treated to remove solid and organic materials. The level of processing of the wastewater is either primary, secondary, advanced secondary, or tertiary. Overall, the treatment level is based on the treatment method and the proportion of materials removed from the wastewater. Community Development Department Indian River County 8 Appdix A In addition to differences in the methods of treating wastewater, the existing wastewater treatment plants also differ in the capacity of the facilities. Expressed in terms of gallons of wastewater per day, the capacity of a wastewater treatment plant is the number of gallons of wastewater that the plant can treat and dispose of on an average daily basis. By -Product Disposal The by-products of the treatment process are effluent, screenings and grit, as well as sludge and septage. Effluent is liquid waste. At county operated wastewater treatment facilities, effluent is usually disposed of through either discharge to a percolation pond, through wetlands, or by reuse. Reuse is an effluent disposal method involving spray irrigation. Screenings and grit are the accumulated coarse sewage solids retained by the screening process. Screenings and grit are disposed of at the county landfill. Sludge and septage are the biological organisms that accumulate in the plant. Prior to final disposal, sludge is usually subjected to an additional biological treatment process to remove pathogens. Sludge is then transported to the County's Residual Dewatering_ Facility (RDF), where along with grease they are subiect It ;q R•''Je^* to a physical dewatering processes which facilitates tr-anspeftatien and disposal. Uluub septage ge ^ e disposed of at ^ ^ al v uaau uv a.0 f4eil ty at the County landf4 . A screw conveyor is used to transfer the dried cake to a truck for hauling to the landfill for ultimate disposal. PUBLIC SEWER SYSTEM The five geographic areas comprising the county public sewer system are: the south regional area, the west regional area, the central regional area, the north regional area, and the City of Vero Beach service area. Within the county system, the south county regional plant is connected to the west county regional plant; the north county regional plant is connected to the central county regional plant; and there is a limited connection between the central regional plant and west regional plant. Because the county's regional wastewater treatment plants are interconnected, there is flexibility as to which plant or plants will need to be expanded to accommodate future demand. At the county's central plant, the county also treats the City of Fellsmere's sewage for a bulk rate. Currently, the city's average daily sewer flow is about 71,000 gallons per day, with a maximum flow of 100,000 gallons per day. Besides its regional plants, Indian River County also operates the Blue Cypress Lake package treatment facility. Community Development Department Indian River County 9 Appdix A In -4006 2017, 21X34)28,167(47.24%44-3"0) of the 59,61j48,188 tmits developed residential and commercial parcels within the County's service area were connected to the County's regional sewer system. A4 that time all ^ stefaer^ of the eounty's system, ineluding these 1 palities totaled 24,250. South Regional Sewer Service Area The South Regional Sewer Service Area is located in the southeast portion of the mainland and contains the South Regional Wastewater Treatment Facility (SRWWTF). The SRWWTF is a 2,000,000 GPD facility which uses biological nutrient removal to provide a tertiary filtration level of treatment. Effluent from the SRWWTF is reused for spray irrigation or discharged into percolation ponds or discharged into the 169 acre man-made wetland on the West Regional WWTF site. In addition to force mains along US 1, the South Regional Service Area collection system currently extends to the Vero Shores, Garden Grove, and Grove Isle developments, portions of the Vero Beach Highlands residential subdivision, and other subdivisions within the southern portion of the county. South Regional Plant Public or Private Public Operating Entity Indian River County Geographic service area South County Area Design capacity in GPD 2,000,000 Current demand in GPD 2017 4-,634,,NA 813,000 Level of Service 250 GPD/ERU Projected facility needs 1,850,000 gal./day 2030 Effluent Disposal Method Reuse Effluent Disposal Site Various Level of Treatment Tertiary Filtration Treatment Method Biological Nutrient Removal Screenings/Grit Disposal Site Landfill Sludge and Septage Disposal Site Sludge Facility at Landfill Community Development Department 10 Indian River County • M-014 A West Sewer Service Area The West Regional Service Area includes the unincorporated SR 60 corridor area and the area southwest of Vero Beach. Within the West RegionalService Area, there is one wastewater treatment plant. The West Regional Wastewater Treatment Facility (WWTF) is located south of 8th Street, north of 0 Street, and between 90th Avenue and 82nd Avenue. This plant, with a 6,000,000 GPD capacity, uses biological nutrient removal to provide a tertiary filtration level of treatment. Presently, effluent from this treatment facility is reused for spray irrigation or discharged into a f 169-5 acre man-made wetland on the treatment plant site. The West Regional Service Area force mains extend from the West Regional WWTF along the SR 60 corridor and along 66' Avenue from SR 60 to 4th Street. Force mains also extend from the West County Plant along 82nd Avenue to the Oslo Road/74th Avenue commercial/industrial node and to the SR 60/I-95 commercial/industrial node. The system serves the Heritage Village, Countryside, Cambridge Park, Indian River Estates, Village Green, Vista Plantation, Lake in the Woods, Sixty Oaks, and Rivera Estates residential developments. West Regional Plant Public or Private Public Operating Entity Indian River County Geographic service area SR 60 Corridor west of 58th Avenue Design capacity in GPD 6,000,000 Current demand in GPD 2017 4-, 8, 8 2,214,000 Level of Service 250 GPD/ERU Projected facility needs 4,850,000 gal./day (2030) Effluent Disposal Method Reuse Irrigation/Wetlands Treatment Effluent Disposal Site Golf Courses & West Reg. Wetlands Level of Treatment Tertiary Filtration Treatment Method Biological Nutrient Removal Screenings/Grit Disposal Site Landfill Sludge and Septage Disposal Site Sludge Facility at Landfill Community Development Department Indian River County 11 Appdix A Central Sewer Service Area The Central Regional Sewer Service Area includes the portion of the mainland generally bounded by I-95 on the west, 69t' Street on the north, the Indian River Lagoon on the east, and the City of Vero Beach and 26th Street on the south. This plant located north of 49th Street, in the unincorporated community of Gifford. The Central Regional Wastewater Treatment Facility (WWTF) is located within the service area. This plant, with a 4,000,000 GPD capacity, uses contact stabilization and extended aeration to provide a tertiary filtration level of treatment. Presently, effluent from the treatment facility is discharged into percolation ponds or reused for spray irrigation. Collection lines extend from the plant along 49th Street, between 58rd Avenue and US 1, along 58th Avenue from 26th Street to 65th Street, along 53rd Street from 58th Avenue to the Lateral H canal and along US 1 from 69th street to Indian River Memorial Hospital. The system also extends to the Bent Pine and Grand Harbor residential developments, and to much of the Gifford community. The Central Regional WWTF is presently accepting flow from the North Regional Wastewater Treatment Facility, which is temporarily on stand-by. The flow is being transferred from the north facility to the central facility via a 16" transmission force main located along Old Dixie Highway from 77th Street to 53rd Street, then into the Central Regional WWTF along the Lateral H canal. Central Re ional Plant Public or Private Public Operating Entity Indian River County Geographic service area Vero Beach City Limits to 69th St. Design capacity in GPD 4,000,000 Current demand in GPD 2017 4 -,834, -NO 2,253,000 Level of Service 250 GPD/ERU Projected facility needs 4,250,000 gal./day (2030) Effluent Disposal Method Reuse Irrigation/Rib Basin Effluent Disposal Site Various Golf Courses Level of Treatment Tertiary Treatment Treatment Method Contact Stabilization/Extended Aeration Screenings/Grit Disposal Site Landfill Sludge and Septage Disposal Site Sludge Facility at landfill Community Development Department Indian River County 12 Appdix A North Sewer Service Area The North Sewer Service Area lies north of 77h Street and encompasses the area between I-95 and the Atlantic Ocean. Within this service area, there is one wastewater treatment plant operated by the county. This plant is the North Regional Wastewater Treatment Facility (WWTF). The North County Plant is an 850,000 GPD facility which uses an oxidation ditch and extended aeration to provide a tertiary filtration level of treatment. Effluent from the North County Plant is discharged into percolation ponds or reused for spray irrigation. North Regional Plant Public or Private Public Operating Entity Indian River County Geographic service area 77th Street to North County Line Design capacity in GPD 850,000 Current demand in GPD 2017 Flow transferred to Central Regional Plant Level of Service 250 GPD/ERU Projected facility needs 4;850;009 2,000,000 gal./day (2030) Effluent Disposal Method Percolation Pond/Spray Pond/SprayIrrigation Effluent Disposal Site Golf Courses Level of Treatment, Tertiary Filtration Treatment Method Oxidation Ditch/Extended Aeration Screenings/Grit Disposal Site Landfill Sludge and Se tage Disposal Site I Sludge Facility at landfill Collection lines extend south from the North County Plant along Old Dixie Highway to 73rd Street. From there, the lines extend east into the Copeland's Landing residential development. To the north, lines extend along the US 1 corridor to the county line. A force main runs along CR 512, from US 1 to I-95, and north along Roseland Road from CR 512 to approximately '/ mile north of Main Street. Another force main extends west along Main Street from US 1 to approximately halfway to Roseland Road. Collection lines, including a force main along the north two miles of Roseland Road, extend to the Roseland area. Collection lines also extend to several residential developments on the north barrier island, including Sea Oaks, Windsor, and the Town of Orchid. Presently, the North Regional WWTF is temporarily shut down, and the flow is being transferred to the Central Regional WWTF via a 16' force main along Old Dixie Highway from 77th Street to 53rd Street and then along the Lateral H canal into the Central Regional WWTF. Community Development Department Indian River County 13 App,dix A City of Vero Beach Sewer Service Area The City of Vero Beach sewer service territory encompasses the City of Vero Beach, most of the Town of Indian River Shores (one multiple -family residential complex is excluded), and the portion of the barrier island south of the City of Vero Beach. In addition, it serves some of the unincorporated county area around the city. The Vero Beach Wastewater Treatment Plant has a design capacity of 4,500,000 GPD. The method of treatment consists of complete mix activated sludge, followed by water reclamation processes that include tertiary filtration and high level disinfection. Most effluent from this plant is used for irrigation by golf courses and residential developments. PuFi ig and iamned a4el after- per-iods of ex4einely high Fainfall, however-, some effluent is disehar-ged ipAe the Indian. r-euse. The remainder is disposed of via deep injection well. City of Vero Beach Plant Public or Private Public Operating Entity City of Vero Beach Geographic service area City of Vero Beach; Town of Indian River Shores; South Barrier Island Design capacity in GPD 4,500,000 Current demand in GPD ZQ 171 3,500., 000 Level of Service 250 GPD/ERU Projected facility needs 4,000,000 gal./day (2030 Effluent Disposal Method Reuse Wet Woa4he.. Dice afgeDeea Iniection Well Effluent Disposal Site Residential Landscapes/Golf Courses Level of Treatment Secondary/High Level Disinfection Treatment Method Activated Sludge/Filtration Screenings/Grit Disposal Site Landfill Sludge and Septage Disposal Site Sludge f edit - at Landfill Table 3:A.2 summarizes the county regional wastewater treatment system. Community Development Department 14 Indian River County Appgoix A Comprehensive Plan Sanitary Sewer Sub -Element TABLE 3.A.2 - COUNTY REGIONAL WASTEWATER TREATMENT SYSTEMS SERVICE TREATMENT DESIGN M9_X11 TYPES OF TREATMENT METHOD TREATMENT EFFLUENT PROPORTIONAL AREA PLANT CAPACITY DEMAND LAND USES LEVEL DISPOSAL METHOD ALLOCATION IN GPD IN GPD SERVED NORTH North County 850,000 Flow residential, oxidation ditch and extended tertiary percolation pond and 60% Sebastian, 30% transferred to commercial, aeration spray irrigation IRC, Central Plant industrial 10% Fellsmere CENTRAL Central County 4,000,000 1,834,008 residential, contact stabilization and tertiary percolation pond and 100% IRC 2,253,000 commercial, extended aeration spray irrigation includes flow industrial from north regional WEST West County 6,000,000 1,950,088 residential, biological nutrient removal tertiary spray irrigation and on- 100% IRC 2.214.000 commercial, site wetland industrial SOUTH South County 2,000,000 1,634,080 residential, Biological nutrient removal tertiary spray irrigation, 100% IRC 813,000 commercial, percolation pond and industrial West Regional Wetland VERO City of Vero 4,500,000 3,500,000 residential, complete mix activated tertiary spray irrigation 65% Vero Bch., 24% BEACH Beach commercial, sludge and high level IRC, industrial disinfection 11% Indian River Shores TOTAL 17,350,000 8,918,000 &780.00 Community Development Department Indian River County 15 441 Comprehensive Plan Finance Sanitary Sewer Sub -Element Financially, the Indian River County Utilities Department is an enterprise system. That means that there is no general tax money allocated for the construction or expansion of utility services. Instead, the County Utilities Department's revenue comes from sources such as water sales, meter installation charges, hydrant maintenance tax, sewer service charges, effluent reuse sales, penalties, service charges, capacity charges, and other sources which make the utility department financially self-sufficient. According to cEounty regulations, most parcels within 200 feet of a county sewer line must connect to the county system. Upon connection, a customer incurs certain charges. Those charges generally cover the costs of capacity producing facility capital improvements. Some charges, however, can be incurred even before connection. Because unused capacity can be reserved for future development, wastewater treatment plants are developed with excess capacity. Since maintaining that excess capacity increases operation and maintenance costs, a monthly base facility charge applies to capacity reserved for future development. Other charges include the following: • Wwaste water treatment charges • volume charges • customer charges • connection charges • meter re -reads and leak inspection charges • delinquency charges • general service call charges • meter calibration charges • damage repair charges • engineering services charges • deposits required upon opening • charges for transferring or reconnecting a service • additional charges for complex connections Some charges, such as connection fees, vary based on meter size or type of commercial use. The Utilities Department may use these revenues to expand facilities or to modify the existing system. These funds can be used for either capital or operating needs. Another source of revenue, which can be used only to offset a portion of the capital cost of expanding system capacity, is the capacity charge. Capacity charges pay for certain necessary improvements that must be made in order to provide added capacity to meet the needs of new Community Development Department Indian River County 16 Appqj�lix A Comprehensive Plan Sanitary Sewer Sub -Element residents as well as industrial and business establishments anticipated in future years. The remaining capital cost is recouped through monthly charges. As a payment option for extension of the sewer collection system, the county allows a contribution in aid of construction. After the installation of sewage collection facilities by a developer, title to those facilities is transferred to the county. The referenced facilities may be "on-site" or "off-site." These options are discussed below. • On -Site Facilities Each developer is responsible for the design, installation, inspection, and testing of the complete sewage collection system located within the boundaries of the developer's property. • Off-site Facilities The location, size or proposed density or intensity of a development project may make service to the property dependent upon the extension of off-site sewage collection facilities. Off-site facilities are those mains, sewage collection lines, sewage force mains, and/or pumping stations adequate in size to transmit sewage collected on the developer's property to a treatment plant or disposal site. The county's policy is to expand its sewer system in an orderly and economical manner. That expansion schedule, however, does not always coincide with a developer's plans. In cases where the county does not plan to expand its system to serve a project in the timeframe required by a developer, the developer is required to construct or pay the cost of off-site facilities associated with that project when the following conditions exist: • such an extension would require an extraordinary expenditure by the county for transmission facilities; and • such expenditure would cost more than the county's standard capacity charge. In that event, the county may negotiate an agreement which enumerates the following: • the county's responsibility to provide service to the development and possibly reimburse the developer for oversized facilities; and • the developer's responsibility to construct and dedicate to the county the off-site facilities (possibly oversized to meet future demands). Community Development Department Indian River County 17 Appgpdix A Comprehensive Plan Refundable Advances Sanitary Sewer Sub -Element In addition to a contribution in aid of construction of off-site facilities, the county may require a refundable advance by a developer to further temporarily defray the cost of any "off-site" extension of water and/or sewer mains and pumping stations necessary to connect the developer's property to the county's water and sewer facilities. This provision recognizes instances in which a developer may be required to advance funds to construct off-site facilities sized in accordance with the County's Master Plan. All amounts expended by a developer pursuant to such an agreement, over and above the developer's need for off-site facilities, may be refunded to the developer in accordance with the terms and conditions of a refunding agreement which the county executes with the developer. When the county deems it to be in the best interest of the county utility system, the County may assume a portion of the material cost of such projects. Generally, refund agreements provide for a plan of refund based upon the connection of other properties served by the "off-site" facilities installed by the developer. Assessment Another funding option available to the county is assessment. With this method, the Board of County Commissioners may assess benefitting property owners a proportional share of the cost of any county project, including utility line extensions. Assessment projects may be initiated by either the Board or property owners. For utility line extensions, main transmission or collection lines (Master Plan lines) are not included in the assessment calculations. Those lines are funded through other sources. Generally, assessments may be financed for up to 10 years, with assessment interest rates set by the Board of County Commissioners in January of each year. Usually, the Board adopts the prime rate. PRIVATE SEWER SYSTEMS Indian River County has four active private sewer systems, each of which uses package treatment plants. Two of the county's private plants are operated by the Sun -Ag company. Those plants are located near the City of Fellsmere, outside of the county's service area. One of those plants serves a mobile home park, while the other serves a packinghouse. Both of those facilities use extended aeration to provide a secondary level of treatment. Effluent at those plants is disposed of through a percolation pond. The county's other private systems are located at the Su -Rene mobile home park and Royal Oak mobile home park in the unincorporated county. Those facilities use extended aeration to provide a secondary level of treatment. Effluent at those plants is disposed of through a percolation pond. Community Development Department Indian River County 18 Appendix A 444 Comprehensive Plan SEPTIC TAM�.'SSYSTEMS Sanitary Sewer Sub -Element The third type of sanitary sewer system is an onsite sewage and treatment and disposal system (OSTDS) which may be utilized under certain conditions when a private or publicly owned centralized sewer system is unavailabl tank. -Septic systems are lly small and designed to serve one or a limited number of use facilities and are sized based on estimated water use. Despite major expansion of the wastewater collection network, many resident -developed commercial and residential parcels within the unincorporated portion of the county do not have access to regional wastewater treatment facilities or package treatment plants. For those land uses, wastewater treatment and disposal is provided by ifidivi"al septic systems. Based on ", eef:ding to t''^the Florida Department of Health Waste Water Inventory for 2015,E Getm4 . 14ea t, Pepai4me„+ (IR urn an estimated 45% of the developed commercial and residential parcels in Indian River County are served by public sanitary sewer and an estimated 55% of the remaining developed commercial and residential parcels are served by septic systems. From 2007 through 2016, there were an average of 658-121 new septic systems constructed annually with steadily increasing numbers from 2013 to 2016. Even so, the average number of new septic systems per year (121) is significantly lower than the 658 new systems per year average for the 1995 - 2006 period. The average number of septic systems repairs per year for the 2007-2016 period was 591. w4hiii the • ...,toa ent-y between 1995 to 2006 of these -septie-tanks, 5% to 89; were or-eemmerc-iel-uses There are commercial and industrial corridors that are served by septic systems such as portions of US Hwy 1, Old Dixie Hwy and Oslo Road. Most of the residential septic systems are concentrated in Roseland, Sebastian, Vero Lake Estates, and the older- platted s;ubd visions south of the City of Ver^ Beae State Road 60. A septic tank system consists of two components. One is the septic tank, while the other is the drainfield. The tank receives sewage from the residence or commercial establishment and provides a period of settling, during which time a significant portion of the solids settle out. The treatment process is accomplished by bacteria that gradually decompose the solids which settle to the bottom of the septic tank. The remaining liquid or effluent is discharged through underground drainage pipes into the drainfield an4-where it percolates into the soil. Once in the soil, microorganisms and filtration o ^ rif -treat the liquids. Evef,, tI ffee to five yeafsF As part of routine maintenance, the accumulated solids should nest -be removed from the septic tank every 3 to 5 years by a licensed contractor. These The solids, called septage, are generally transported to regional san.4-J o o 14eil ti -es fe r t -Fe tmepA to disp the residual dewatering facility next to the county landfill. Septic tanlc-systems provide minimal on-site wastewater treatment for be&residential and small - sc-ale-commercial developments. Gonera4yTypically, a 3 -bedroom residential septic tanks system has a 900- gallon septic tank and 375 square Community Development Department Indian River County 19 Appendix A 445 Comprehensive Plan Sanitary Sewer Sub -Element feet of trench drainfield. Commercial septic tanks systems vary depending on estimated water use.usti lly ha -v^ ^'^r^^- ,..,p.,eity Since effluent from septic tanks is discharged to a drainfield where it is allowed +^ percolates into the soil, soil permeability and depth to the water table are limiting factors for septic tank -s souse. To ensure adequate performance and protection of groundwater quality, elevation of septic tam s sy tem drainfields is often required. All OSTDS (septic system) permitting is done by the Florida Department of Health in Indian River County (DOH -Iridian River). According to the IRG14D, Indian Rivef County DOH -Indian River it is challenging toga diffieul permit eetinty in •_ hiedf to n;�+^" septic tanksysterns installations in the county afedue to several factors whieh aeeefor-this diffieulty. These fueter-s areincludg: • a highEet season water table of less than 10 -inches as described in the USDA Soil Surve ifound in almost all areas and • JVLI VVIl\lILLVIIJ LVA the presence of restrictive low permeable soil strata; • platted or recorded parcels less than %2 acre; and • setbacks from surface waters and/or wells. The areas of the county having "Excessively Drained Soils" and "Moderately Drained Soils" are better suited for septic tank -systems. As shown on Figure 3.E.1 of the Stormwater Management Sub -Element, even these two soil types have limitations with respect to septic tank system suitability. While moderately drained soils have a severe limitation rating for septic tank -system suitability, excessively drained soils percolate so rapidly that they provide very poor filtration. Septic tanks -s systems these soils have a potential for causing groundwater contamination. Areas of excessively drained soils in Indian River Countv are tvpically adiacent to waterbodies including canals, St. Sebastian River, and the Indian River Lagoon. r,,,. fend.. the ro rur, The Florida Department of Health (DOH) establishes the rules for septic system permitting.fequires that a septie taFAE sysTefa have -a mifliffiUM of 42 iflehes Of w�1 Community Development Department Indian River County 20 Appendix A 446 - - PIMPIr The areas of the county having "Excessively Drained Soils" and "Moderately Drained Soils" are better suited for septic tank -systems. As shown on Figure 3.E.1 of the Stormwater Management Sub -Element, even these two soil types have limitations with respect to septic tank system suitability. While moderately drained soils have a severe limitation rating for septic tank -system suitability, excessively drained soils percolate so rapidly that they provide very poor filtration. Septic tanks -s systems these soils have a potential for causing groundwater contamination. Areas of excessively drained soils in Indian River Countv are tvpically adiacent to waterbodies including canals, St. Sebastian River, and the Indian River Lagoon. r,,,. fend.. the ro rur, The Florida Department of Health (DOH) establishes the rules for septic system permitting.fequires that a septie taFAE sysTefa have -a mifliffiUM of 42 iflehes Of w�1 Community Development Department Indian River County 20 Appendix A 446 Comprehensive Plan Sanitary Sewer Sub -Element draining sail bolew the inti t..,,4ing s ,..f ee of the a,.ainfi . During the wet season,mentis_ of June through October, the season of gfe test .-ain f ", the water table in much of the county may be ends less than 24-10 inches below this iafilt faro^ su the existing naturalrg ade. Therefore, fill material is often placed on top of existing soil creating a mound to achieve the required 24 inch separation between the bottom of the drainfield and the wet season water table. This fill material, which provides the depth necessary for the proper operation of the septic tank system, is—uS efeus swan that ean pufi6, the liquids diseharged 440 tie dr-ainfieklAypically contains slightly limited soils that treat effluent discharged into the drainfield. The DOH has determined that the average life of a residential septic system (includin drainfield) is 19 years and that of a commercial system is 10 years. Routine maintenance and proper use can extend the life of a septic system. When septic systems are repaired the DOH allows for a drainfield replacement according to the rules in Place at the time of original construction. Most repairs for parcels developed prior. to 1983 are permitted with only a 6 inch separation between the bottom of the drainfield and the wet season water table rather than 24 inches. In low density areas with adequate soils where septic tanks -systems, are appropriate, there can still be problems if septic ta&s-systems are not maintained. Generally, septic tanks need to be roped ^n a regular- basis pumped every 3 to 5 years. While there are private septic tank service companies which e -pump septic tanks and haul away septage, it is the septic tank owner who is responsible for initiating maintenance activities. -Improperly maintained septic sstems can cause a system failure and a sanitary nuisance often requiring a repair of the septicsystem. Even when fill material is plaeed an a residential let, there afe still afeas ef the eetffi4y ill whieh there are ~~:.Mems with septie tank systems Besides soil and groundwater conditions, adverse impacts may arise th ejfse p..eble.,,,may be due to inadequate separation between septic tank system drainfields and wells or waterbodies. Without adequate separation, the potential of contamination from septic tanks systems seeping into wells or waterbodies is greatly increased. D,-esen4l., the IRCHD The DOH requires a minimum separation of 75 feet between wells and septic -terms systems for parcels recorded or platted after 1972. Gener-ally, theThe DOH D requires tiat-new construction lets -utilizing a well and septic-tafik systems to be a minimum of acre (approximately 20,00)--_21 ,780 square feet). If a lot is served by a public water system, a septics sy tem may be used even if the lot is as small as % acre (approximately 10,000 10,890 square feet). There are many areas of the county in which existing subdivisions contain lots which do not meet the minimum acreage requirements. f r well and septie tar'- systems. Nevertheless,ap rcels recorded or platted prior to 1972 that are smaller than 21,780 and 10,890 square feet are grandfathered in and are being developed and repaired based on lot flow allowances.off tia Community Development Department Indian River County 21 Appendix A 447 Comprehensive Plan Sanitary Sewer Sub -Element utilizing e septic systems. withetit eenneeted- to the fegional petable water -system. Table 3.A.3 lists subdivisions in the county urban service area that are significantly less than 10,.890 square feet or constructed with older block septic tanks posing an with increased health risks and/or increased probability of groundwater contamination associated with continued septic system use. TABLE 3.A.3 - INDIAN RIVER COUNTY SUBDIVISIONS WITH INCREASED HEALTH RISKS AND/OR INCREASED PROBABILITY OF GROUNDWATER CONTAMINATION ASSOCIATED WITH CONTINUED SEPTIC TANK SYSTEM USE 1. Oslo Park 2. Paradise Park 3. Stevens Park 4. Durrance Place W. West Wabasso TABLE 3.A.3 - INDIAN RIVER COUNTY SUBDIVISIONS WITH INCREASED HEALTH RISKS AND/OR INCREASED PROBABILITY OF GROUNDWATER CONTAMINATION ASSOCIATED WITH CONTINUED SEPTIC TANK SYSTEM USE 1. Oslo Park 2. Paradise Park 3. Stevens Park 4. Durrance Place 5. West Wabasso Source: DOH- Indian River r'ewit , Health and &Wlities n,.„aro# encs Besides the above list of subdivisions with increased health risk and potential for localized groundwater contamination, there are subdivisions currently served by septic systems that are located close to the Indian River Lagoon, the St. Sebastian River, or to drainage canals or other streams/surface waters potentially resulting in a disproportionally higher negative impact on Indian River Lagoon water quality. In 2016, county Utilities Services funded a septic to sewer study to identify and rank those platted subdivisions served by septic systems that have a disproportionately higher negative impact on the Indian River Lagoon. The study was performed by Schulke, Bittle and Stoddard, LLC (SBS), was accepted by the Board of County Commissioners on July 10, 2017, and is available online via the county website. Community Development Department Indian River County 22 Appendix A 448 Comprehensive Plan Sanitary Sewer Sub -Element Septic to Sewer Study: Evaluation and Rankine The goal of the study was to identify and rank the areas of septic system use having disproportionately higher potential for negative lagoon impact based on various physical and environmental factors, and to determine the feasibility of incorporating septic to sewer conversion mitigation projects into a 10 -year Capital Improvements Plan. As part of the study, a specific formula for the utility service area of Indian River County (IRC) was developed and modeled after similar studies performed for Martin County (Martin County Septic Ssy tem Evaluation Final Report; CapTec Engineering, Inc.: February 13, 2015) and Brevard County (Save Our Lagoon Proiect Plan for Brevard County, Florida; TetraTech, Inc and CloseWaters LLC July 28, 2016). The IRC formula was modified from the formulas used in the Martin and Brevard studies to consider and weigh physical and environmental factors that SBS and IRC staff determined would better represent Indian River County conditions. In the IRC study, the following factors were used in the initial ranking of the three hundred and twenty-five (325) platted subdivisions currently served by septic tanks with respect to potential negative impacts on the lagoon: • Population Density for Loading Concentrations • Proximity to Surface Waters • Location of the Community in Relation to the 100 -year Flood Plain —FEMA Flood Plain • Depth of the Ground Water Table • Soil Conditions of the Drain Field — Soil Type • Age of the Surface Water Management System • Age of the Existing Onsite Sewage Treatment and Disposal Systems (OSTDS) Each factor was evaluated for every one of the 325 subdivisions and assigned an index number that generally ranged from 0 to 12, with 0 being the minimum and 12 being the maximum impact. The fonnula used to determine the ranking was simply the sum of all factor values for that subdivision. The higher the sum (the "score"), the higher the estimated potential negative impact to the Indian River Lagoon (IRL). SBS and IRC staff agreed to weight the "Population Density" and "Proximity to Surface Waters" factors in the IRC study, because those two factors are believed to cause a higher negative impact than the other factors. In the study, the 325 subdivisions served by septic systems were ranked in order where number 1 had the highest negative lagoon impact (89.19) and number 325 had the lowest negative impact (26.97). Once the initial ranking was finalized, an Engineers Opinion of Probable Cost (OPC) was estimated for the top thirty five (35) ranked subdivisions having the highest negative impacts. Those to 3 5 ranked subdivisions were further evaluated based on the following factors: 1. Aquatic Health - Environmental Impact Evaluation or the Initial Ranking 2. Sewer System Evaluation and Cost Data 3. Total Nitrogen (TN)/Total Phosphorus (TP) 4. Public Health - Based on the availability of potable water Community Development Department Indian River County 23 App44ndix A Comprehensive Plan Sanitary Sewer Sub -Element The study evaluated the total nitrogen (TN) and total phosphorus (TP) that could be removed from the environment by septic to sewer conversion and calculated a cost per pound for TN removal f o r e a c h o f. the top 3 5 ranked subdivisions. TP calculations were removed from the analysis since most technical references and studies show that phosphorus i s adequately removed by a properly functioning septic system. Septic to sewer conversion projects for the top 35 subdivisions were then ranked for the highest benefit to cost ratio, with the number 1 ranking providing thereg atest benefit compared to the conversion project cost (see Table 3.A.3.1). TABLE 3.A.3.1 - INDIAN RIVER COUNTY LIST OF SUBDIVISIONS FOR SEPTIC TO SEWER CONVERSION WITHIN UNINCORPORATED COUNTY; AND CITY OF SEBASTIAN, AND TOWN OF nn rum Rank Subdivision Name Rank Subdivision Name Rank Subdivision Name 1 Floravon Shores Subdivision 14 Sebastian Highlands Unit 02 24 Dales Landing Subdivision Tropic Colony Subdivision Replat PG 2 2 Sebastian Highlands Unit 02 Collier 14 Hobart Landing Unit 3 24 ^M^,;'�** 3 Sebastian Highlands Unit 05 16 River Shores Estates Units 1- 29 Winter Grove Subdivision 4 4 Hobart Landing Unit 2 17 Pine Tree Park Units 1-4 29 Kanawah Acres 5 Orchid Island No. 2 17 Indian River Heights Units 1 31 Tropic Colony Subdivision -9 5 Sebastian Highlands Unit 04 17 Sebastian Highlands Unit 02 32 Halleluiah Acres Replat PG 7 Orchid Island No. 1 20 Rain Tree Corner Subdivision 33 Little Portion Subdivision Re lat OF 8 Sebastian Highlands Unit 01 21 Diana Park Subdivision 34 Sebastian Highlands Unit 02 Replat PG 4 * 8 Ambersand Beach Sub No 1 & 2 22 Verona Estates Subdivision 35 Heritage Trace at Hobart* 10 Sebastian Highlands Unit 03 22 Sebastian Highlands Unit 13: Little Portion Subdivision Replat Of 11 1 Sebastian Highlands Unit 02 1 24 1 Hobart Landing Unit 1 11 Narania TR Shellmound Bch Replat of POR 24 Hallmark Ocean Subdivision 13 1 Orchid Isle Estates Subdivision 24 Stevens Park Unit 1 & 2 * These communities are included in the evaluation due to their proximity to one or more top 30 ranked communities. ** It is recommended that the Amos subdivision not be considered in the capital improvement program. Ranking results are due to an anomaly in the methodology. Community Development Department Indian River County 24 App�esnodix A Comprehensive Plan Sanitary Sewer Sub -Element REGULATORY FRAMEWORK The wastewater collection, treatment, and disposal system is regulated by various agencies at all levels of government. Table 3.A.4 shows the state and local agencies involved in wastewater regulation and the types of activities in which they are involved. FEDERAL The Federal Water Pollution Control Act of 1972 (PL 92-500) and its amendments through the Clean Water Acts of 1977 (PL 95-217) and 1981 (PL 97-117) are the basis for pollution control regulation in the nation. The goal of these acts is the restoration and/or maintenance of the chemical, physical, and biological integrity of the nation's water. The act established a national policy of implementing areawide wastewater treatment and management programs to ensure adequate control of sources of pollution. Under a provision of PL 92-500, grants are made available to local governments to construct facilities to treat "point sources" of pollution, including effluent from sewage treatment processes. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency is responsible for implementing the act. STATE The Florida Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) is the agency responsible for ensuring that the State carries out the requirements of PL 92-500. In response to PL 92-500, DEP has adopted Chapters 17-3 and 17-6, FAC. These chapters regulate wastewater facilities which treat flows exceeding 10,000 GPD. Alith-i 4H the-State-,4The Florida Department of Health (DOH) regulates septic tanks and dr-ainfiel system installations per Section 381.0065 Florida .Statutes (FS). The DOH - Indian River locally administers the septic system program for Indian River County.has an 0 to ,-egul ,*o septie system These regulations for septic system permitting are have been adopted by rule in Chapter 64E-6, Florida Administrative Code (FAC). While 64E-6 FAC does not set the criteria for septics sy tem effluent quality, it does require that septic tanks -systems be installed in such a manner that, with reasonable maintenance, they will not create a health hazard or endanger the safety of any domestic water supply. In addition to regulating wastewater facilities, 64E 6Sections 381.0065(2)(a) and 381.00655 FS also establishes criteria for mandatory connections to wastewater systems . Systemsne, of Eling to tha4 fe ,iatio, lafi uses that u.e ..ith;.. cnn fi t 0 f a grwity line er-1000 eenneet to the utilities system. Pursuant to those sections, yPublic sanitary sewer is considered available when gravity sewer lines or low-pressure lines are in a right-of-way or easement adjacent to a property or lot, when any use producing more than 1,000alg lons per day has public sewer lines within 5.0 feet of a property line and has access to the lines via apublic right-of-way or easement, when a public sewer line is accessible and within V4 mile of a proposed residential subdivision of more than 50 lots, when a public sewer line is accessible and within '/ mile of a Community Development Department Indian River County 25 App4e5ndix A Comprehensive Plan Sanitary Sewer Sub -Element proposed commercial subdivision of more than 5 lots, or when a public sewer line is accessible and within'/ mile of a proposed use in an area zoned or used for an industrial, manufacturing or equivalent use. When repairs or modifications are needed to a use in an area zoned or used for industrial or manufacturing or its equivalent, that use must also connect to a wastewater system if that use is within 500 feet of an establishment's or residences sewer stub -out. LOCAL In 1984, Indian River County adopted an ordinance that established the utility rate structure and a mandatory hookup policy for both residential and non-residential development. County policy generally states that any development located within 200 feet of a wastewater collection line must connect. In addition to that ordinance, the Utilities Department also has developed and adopted design standards and review procedures to ensure that all connections to the system are compatible with the system's design. TABLE 3.A.4 - REGULATION OF SEWAGE Source: Indian River County Utilities Department Community Development Department Indian River County 26 App4eSndix A Statutory Agency Authority Scope Activity DEP Ch 403 FS Responsible for all Permits & inspection of 17-6 FAC wastewater treatment plants, wastewater plants over and wastewater flows greater 10,000 GPD. Regulate than 10,000 GPD. Regulates private package private wastewater plants. facilities. DOH; Ch 381 FS Responsible for all onsite Inspects, testspermits, County 64E-6 FAC disposal systems less than and enforces all septic Health 10,000 GPD of domestic systems less than 10,000 Dem wastewater. GPD. Responds to all public complaints. County Utili- Local Ordinance Responsible for review, -and Inspects all work on ties Dept. Home Rule construction, and connection county public to e€the public wastewater wastewater system. system. Regulates F , ..ehise ef private wastewater- plants. Regulates r~.,,.ehise paekage f4eilities. W44 not ennit paekage plants under- 20,099 GPD eapaeity- Source: Indian River County Utilities Department Community Development Department Indian River County 26 App4eSndix A Comprehensive Plan ANALYSIS Sanitary Sewer Sub -Element The analysis of the Sanitary Sewer Sub -Element focuses on the three components of the sanitary sewer system: collection, treatment, and disposal. COLLECTION SYSTEM The principal components of the sanitary sewer collection system are pipes, manholes, and pump stations. Because Indian River County has a relatively new sanitary sewer system, those pipes and pump stations are generally in good condition. Overall, most of the major lines are in place and sized to accommodate future growth. The county's long range plan for growth and development is reflected in the Future Land Use Element of the comprehensive plan. That element defines where the community will grow and where growth will be limited. As indicated in the Future Land Use Element, the urban service area is the area deemed appropriate for future urban type development. Accordingly, it is within the urban service area that utility lines and other infrastructure components will be available. Although regional sanitary sewer service should generally be limited to lands within the urban service area, there should be some exceptions. Historically, the county has allowed sites contiguous to the urban service area boundary to connect to the regional sanitary sewer system, and that is appropriate. There are also other types of development allowed outside the urban service area, where regional sanitary sewer service is appropriate and in some cases necessary. These include clustered development in agricultural planned development projects, new town projects, traditional neighborhood design projects, agricultural businesses, and agricultural industries. For these uses, the county should allow connection to the regional sanitary sewer system or construction of a privately owned system, where connection to the public system is not feasible. In those cases where a privately owned system is allowed, the county should require that a franchise be obtained from the county and that any plants and collection systems be built to county standards and, where deemed appropriate by the county, be dedicated to the county without compensation. The major collection system issues include service area, system evaluation and maintenance, system expansion related to serving areas presently served by septic tank systems, and system expansion to serve new development. Service Area Although the sanitafy seweF seFviee aFeas 44ff ahe eVe-un-ty and the City of Ver -9 geaeh have beei+ set for- many years, r-eeeat evepAs have ifiifia4ed irAer-est in r-eeensidefation of these s by the City of Vefe Beaeh. Community Development Department Indian River County 27 App4e5ndix A Comprehensive Plan Sanitary Sewer Sub -Element C_ 114: Fentb Vero Beach serves those areas outside its corporate limits based on interlocal agreements with the county and the Town of Indian River Shores. For the unincorporated county, the city water and waste water agreement expired in 2017 and is currently being re- negotiated. For the Town of Indian River Shores, its agreement with the city for water, wastewater, and reuse expired and was renewed in 2012. That agreement is for an initial term of 15 years. Unless Indian River Shores provides notice of its desire to renegotiate or terminate four years before the expiration of that 15 year period, the agreement will automatically renew for another 15 years. Wile these ., ee erAs v v in 2017, the „ .,+y .,ray,,,. -ro...,., tst p Ode the 2017 teff. inane. date Currently, the Indian River County water and waste water service area is comprised of the following: • Majority of unincorporated Indian River County • City of Sebastian • Town of Orchid System Evaluation and Maintenance The sanitary sewer collection system is evaluated with each application for new development, and as each package treatment plant is decommissioned. That evaluation is done using a computer modeling program, known as the "WaterCad" model that evaluates several factors, including pipe capacity, lift station capacity, horse power requirements for pumps, and hydraulic pump pressure. In contrast to the City of Vero Beach, which is largely built -out and has provided utility service for many decades, sewer service is still relatively new to the rapidly Community Development Department Indian River County 28 Appendix A Comprehensive Plan Sanitary Sewer Sub -Element growing unincorporated county. Consequently, the county's collection system is constantly evaluated. Within the county's service area, the major collection system problem is low velocity in force mains. In particular, the 24 inch, 20 inch, and 12 inch force mains in the US 1 corridor have low velocities even at peak flows. The low velocity is caused by oversized lines and a lack of wastewater generated. Where the velocity is less than 2 feet/second, solids will settle in pipelines. Settled solids decrease hydraulic capacity. Another problem occurs when a mass of accumulated solids become "unsettled" and reaches a treatment plant in an unexpectedly large concentration. In the past, this situation has resulted in sewage spills. While increased pipeline maintenance is necessary to prevent a reoccurrence of such spills, the recent installation of numerous automatic air release valves has corrected the problem by relieving gases that were preventing the normal flow of sewage through influent pipes. In the future, the county's policy should be to continue to install automatic air release valves in all new lines. Service to New Development Through the Utilities Department Wastewater Master Plan, the county has identified main lines that must be installed along major corridors. Unlike other collection lines, "Master Plan" lines usually do not connect directly to a wastewater generator. While master plan lines are paid for by the Utilities Department with revenue from capacity charges and other sources, non -master plan lines are paid from other sources. Besides capital improvements programming and the assessment process, another way to expand the collection system is through the platting and site plan approval requirements of new development. For example, current comprehensive plan policies and land development regulations mandate that each new subdivision within the Urban Service Area connect to the centralized wastewater service system, if the proposed subdivision meets either of the following criteria. • It is within one-quarter of a mile of existing wastewater lines; or • It contains 25 or more lots. For non-residential projects, only those located more than % mile from the existing system and generating less than 2000 gallons per day are not required to connect to the regional system. Even non-residential projects meeting those requirements must connect if the system expands to within'/ mile of the project. Those requirements need to be maintained to ensure that expansion of the regional sanitary sewer system occurs and to ensure that the costs of that expansion are paid by the beneficiaries of the Community Development Department Indian River County 29 App4e5ndix A Comprehensive Plan Sanitary Sewer Sub -Element expansion. Even when a development project does not meet the above criteria, the project must connect to the regional sanitary sewer system if the project is deemed unacceptable for septic tank system use due to increased health and groundwater contamination risks. There are several reasons for requiring nearly all new development to connect to the regional system. Those reasons are listed below. • Regional systems are less likely to fail. • Regional systems are better regulated and inspected. • Regional systems provide a higher level of treatment. That higher level of treatment allows the effluent to be reused, rather than injected into the ground where the effluent increases the risk of groundwater contamination. • Regional systems are economically more efficient to build and operate, but only if all new development connects to the system. Septic Tla*ksSystems Between 1995-2007 and 20016, X39-1,217 new septic stems (average of 65*9121 per year) were permitted. Additionally, during that time period 5,919 septic systems were repaired typically requiring a drainfield replacement. within the ,.,.. a4y Generally, septic mss—systems are a potential source of groundwater and surface water contamination, especially in areas where they are densely concentrated, and the water table is high and waterbody setbacks are less than 75 feet. According to thl3DOH-Indian River, there have been are many cases of eii �reeer- of ^ •vee"'s A•,a*er- ce wells and surface waters being contaminatedeeeming pelluted due —te—septie tank diseharges from septic system discharges. As indicated in Table 3.A.5, septic tames sy tem effluent is of poor quality by today's wastewater treatment standards. Consequently, effluent discharges can cause detrimental increases in nitrogen, chloride, sodium, other ions, total dissolved solids, and the microbiological levels of the local groundwater. Community Development Department Indian River County 30 App45ndix A Comprehensive Plan Sanitary Sewer Sub -Element TABLE 3.A.5 - TYPICAL CONCENTRATIONS FOR HOUSEHOLD WASTEWATER, SEPTIC TANK EFFLUENT AND WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT EFFLUENT PARAMETER CONCENTRATION SEPTIC TANK WASTEWATER HOUSEHOLD EFFLUENT TREATMENT PLANT WASTEWATER Max Da Biochemical Oxygen 430 150 20 Demand, 5 -day (BODS), mg/I Total Suspended Solids, 370 50 20 mg/1 Fecal Coliform (per 7.5 X105 5X105 200 l 00ml) Total Nitrogen, mg/l 84 30 3812 Ammonia Nitrogen, mg/1 64 25 N/A Total Phosphateorus, 61 12 61_5 mg/1 Source: Indian River County Wastewater Master Plan Generally, the current system of septic tank -s s� tem maintenance is acceptable, particularly for newer septic tanks meeting current regulations. For older septic -tanks stems, however, lack of maintenance can be a problem, and there is no program requiring regular maintenance of these septic-tankss sy tems. According to DOH -Indian River, a required septic tank maintenance program could reduce septic tank -s s_ m failures and associated adverse impacts; however, such a program would be costly and difficult to implement. In the future, the focus of the county and the TDADOH-Indian River should be on providing public education programs on the proper use, inspection, and maintenance of septic tanks. Several features inherent to the operation of septic tank systems make them prone to contaminating groundwater without any visual indication. For example, septic ti_systems that are undersized or not emptied eften ene •^'pumped every 3-5 years can accumulate sludge and scum, resulting in a poorer quality effluent. When high groundwater conditions (within 3 +„ ^ fie of of aF,,:„sola elev tie 2 feet from the bottom of the drainfield) exist, additional fill is needed. Once a septic tamsystem is installed and buried, these and other operating problems cannot be recognized until the entire system fails and raw (untreated) sewage backs up into the house plumbing or seeps above ground. Thus, a septic tanlEsystem that appears to be functioning properly may, in reality, be providing very poor "treatment". This problem is more likely to occur in areas of higher residential density where parcels are less than '/ acre, -and in Community Development Department Indian River County 31 Appendix A Comprehensive Plan Sanitary Sewer Sub -Element areas with a high concentration of commercial/industrial use, and areas with construction that predates 1983. - According to the United States Department of Agriculture's Soil Conservation Service, Soil Survey most of Indian River County's soil has severe limitations for the use of septic tam systems. Combined with the cEounty's high wet season water table, this creates a high potential for groundwater and surface water contamination problems. Since 1983, Fe hes fease sfor new construction, theH?,DDOH— has requiresd that the bottom of drainfields be at least 42-24 inches above the wet season water table . To meet this requirement, fill materia' of an approved sand fi'*eftypicall sly ightly limited soil may be added to the site creating a mound. Also, a X75 foot separation requirement must be met between wells and/or waterbodies and septic tamsystems. lent fflust be When parcels platted or recorded after 1972 meet minimum lot size requirements t4ider-�qnd the above conditions, septic tafAE system performance is considered adequate for developments within the cEounty. Another tissue with septic tamsystems is the possibility of wastewater- septage Ieaehate effluent from a septic tarsstem entering open bodies of wa4er waterbodies in the cGounty. This problem must be examined carefully, especially on the barrier island, in areas near the Indian River Lagoon, in areas near the St. Sebastian River, and in areas adjacent to canals, lakes or wetlands. To summarize, the problems with septic tanlFsystems are listed below: • Physical limitations existing in Indian River County o A high water table of less than 10 inches as described in the USDA Soil Survey is found in almost all areas of the county, especially during the months of the wet season June through October. o Ninety-three percent of the county's soil has an t ..,w..'.4ng edict h er-ize.. (a tr-iefive_ layer- often eefnpr-ised ef sandy elay leam) and, therefore, is not suitable fer- septie . This problem ean be selved in areas with a low residential density by some ffledifieafien of desi and eenstfti fief of septie to .is considered to have restrictive low permeable soil strata not suitable for septic system installations - Community Development Department Indian River County 32 App45ngdix A Comprehensive Plan • Health and safety Sanitary Sewer Sub -Element o Poor quality of septictaiiks sy tem effluent compared to wastewater treatment plant effluent. o High Potential fore€ groundwater contamination and spread of communicable disease. o Cost and insufficiency of monitoring process. o Inappropriate septage disposal. • Environmental Consideration o Groundwater contamination. o beaeha4e to s r- face water- b ,.dies Waterbody contamination. For those reasons, there is a need to expand the regional wastewater treatment system to areas where existing or future land uses, soil and groundwater conditions, proximity to surface water bodies, and/or lot size make continued use of septic systems unacceptable due to increased health and groundwater contamination risks. Uh–is i mind, *The county should always allow the voluntary expansion of the regional sanitary sewer system to existing developments within the urban service area. Additionally, the county must determine under what conditions to impose retrofitting on existing development especially areas that impact the Indian River Lagoon and areas significantly less than '/ acre in size. Some parcels recorded -andor platted prior to 1972 are only 0.11 acres making it difficult to repair septic systems to code. —As indicated in the fmance section of this element, a major portion of the cost of service expansion to existing subdivisions is funded through assessments. In the past, some residents have objected to the costs of such assessments, often citing an inability to pay. Community Development Department Indian River County 33 App45n9 dix A • _. MMM LOU Community Development Department Indian River County 33 App45n9 dix A Comprehensive Plan Sanitary Sewer Sub -Element Instead, The county must establish criteria to differentiate between areas where retrofitting is required_ -andAnens whefefet:Fefittia-is-allow Because of the cost of retrofitting projects within the urban service area is ..o'„t;vely eonstant, the most appropriate criteria to use to identify areas to retrofit are increased health risks and increased groundwater and/or surface water contamination risks. When any of the following conditions exist and the HkCHBDOH-Indian River verifies that the health and groundwater contamination risks cannot be sufficiently reduced by any means other than connecting to the regional system, retrofitting must occur. Areas with small lot sizes less than 1/4 acre especially those constructed prior to 1983. Whefe units are not eeniqeeted to a regional potole watef systeffl, this Fefef-S to lots Of ',� aefe of less. -Residential subdivisions that meet those criteria are identified in Table 3.A.3. • Areas with intense land uses. Intense land uses means commercial,,Lindustrial or equivalent uses or residential uses greater than 6 units/acre. • Environmentally Sensitive Areas. This means areas within 500 feet of aquifer recharge zones, as identified in the Aquifer Recharge Sub -Element of this plan; within 500 feet of any public water supply well; within 500 feet of the Indian River Lagoon, the St. Sebastian River, or any body of water that drains into them. • As identified in the 2017 Septic to Sewer Study: Evaluation and Ranking by Utilities. • Areas identified by the DOH -Indian River HkG14D-as potential threats to public health • New developments on oceanfront and riverfront lots For planning purposes, a history of septic tank€ailtifesystem repairs is defined as follows: For subdivisions of 10 or fewer lots, this means 20% failures in five years. For subdivisions of 11 to 75 lots, this means 10% failures in eight -five years. For subdivisions of more than 75 lots, this means 2% failures in ten -five years. ReSide^ti-a ubdivisions that meet these elitefia are identified in Table -3. -A -.3 - Methods that allow for a higher level of effluent treatment and reduction of contamination include: linstallation of a "performance based system", providing a 24 inch separation between the bottom of the drainfield and the wet season water table, and providing at least a 75 foot setback between septic systems and wells and/or surface waterbodies. Generally, the most effective and efficient way to correct the wastewater problem of those subdivisions is to connect them to the regional system. Other option eould invelve adding fill an& -- the wastewater- to another septie tank. Although the eests and effeetiveness of these options vafy Community Development Department Indian River County 34 App46nodix A Comprehensive Plan Sanitary Sewer Sub -Element TREATMENT In addition to septic tank systems, public and private treatment plants provide wastewater treatment within the county. In Indian River County, large regional public treatment plants now predominate. Consequently, major treatment issues in the county relate primarily to ensuring sufficient capacity (either on-site or off-site) to accommodate projected growth. If wastewater demand were allowed to exceed the county's treatment capacity, untreated sewage would have to be discharged. That would result in health hazards and environmental degradation of surface water bodies. To prevent such an occurrence, the county must continue its policy of approving new development only when sufficient capacity will be available. In this regard, the county's computerized concurrency management system and its capital improvements plan ensure that capacity will be available to serve new development concurrent with demand. Public Treatment Plants Besides producing high quality effluent, all public treatment plants currently have more than enough capacity to accommodate existing demand. The following sections discuss the county's future wastewater treatment needs and alternatives to meet those needs. Projection of Future Demand Assumptions The comprehensive planning process is an opportunity for the county to complete an assessment of its long range sanitary sewer needs. Such a needs assessment must consist of an analysis that is more than a straight line linear projection. Future projections should utilize certain assumptions based on past trends, present conditions, and future desires. The main assumptions utilized in the sanitary sewer needs assessment are as follows: The county will be the primary provider of sanitary sewer collection, treatment, and disposal; • The City of Vero Beach will continue to serve the City of Vero Beach, the Town of Indian River Shores and a portion of the unincorporated county; and Community Development Department Indian River County 35 Apothdix A I1�71iI,IN11A9171�IMP0 ._ __M .... MI!)l�1�1lfX 1210191—M10. TREATMENT In addition to septic tank systems, public and private treatment plants provide wastewater treatment within the county. In Indian River County, large regional public treatment plants now predominate. Consequently, major treatment issues in the county relate primarily to ensuring sufficient capacity (either on-site or off-site) to accommodate projected growth. If wastewater demand were allowed to exceed the county's treatment capacity, untreated sewage would have to be discharged. That would result in health hazards and environmental degradation of surface water bodies. To prevent such an occurrence, the county must continue its policy of approving new development only when sufficient capacity will be available. In this regard, the county's computerized concurrency management system and its capital improvements plan ensure that capacity will be available to serve new development concurrent with demand. Public Treatment Plants Besides producing high quality effluent, all public treatment plants currently have more than enough capacity to accommodate existing demand. The following sections discuss the county's future wastewater treatment needs and alternatives to meet those needs. Projection of Future Demand Assumptions The comprehensive planning process is an opportunity for the county to complete an assessment of its long range sanitary sewer needs. Such a needs assessment must consist of an analysis that is more than a straight line linear projection. Future projections should utilize certain assumptions based on past trends, present conditions, and future desires. The main assumptions utilized in the sanitary sewer needs assessment are as follows: The county will be the primary provider of sanitary sewer collection, treatment, and disposal; • The City of Vero Beach will continue to serve the City of Vero Beach, the Town of Indian River Shores and a portion of the unincorporated county; and Community Development Department Indian River County 35 Apothdix A Comprehensive Plan Sanitary Sewer Sub -Element • 90% to 95% of future new development will connect to the regional sewer system. The county will continue to maintain these policies and evaluate the feasibility of regional system versus package treatment plants for the above referenced type of developments. The existing conditions section of this sub -element provides a discussion of the existing capacity of centralized wastewater treatment facilities, with an emphasis on the county system. That discussion addresses the supply side of the wastewater treatment system. This section considers the demand side. The information for this section is based on the permanent and functional population projections contained in the Introductory Element and on the projected land use patterns contained in the Future Land Use Element. That information is also consistent with the county utilities master plan. To develop these projections, the county used data such as historic growth, population estimates, number and type of dwelling units, and developed commercial/industrial acreage. As with other facility analyses, planning for wastewater treatment facility expansion requires a rational approach to projecting growth over a finite planning period. Past experience has shown that using the historic growth of existing facilities in conjunction with population projections is the most accurate method of projecting wastewater generation rates for future treatment facility expansions. Capital Improvements According to the county sanitary sewer master plan, the total design capacity of the county sanitary sewer system in 2030 is projected to be 19 million gallons per day (MGD), while total demand is projected to be about 12.62 million gallons per day (MGD). To got to a 19 gallon pe day eapaeity, either- the net4h eounty r-egional plant aa&ef the west regional plaH4 will be expanded in eaeh of the following ears.- '�015, and 2025. Theincreases-will be: 2 Mgd i . This information is shown in the graph below. Because all of the plants in the county system are interconnected, there is flexibility as to which plant or plants will be expanded to accommodate future demand. Community Development Department Indian River County 36 ApoFndix A Comprehensive Plan Sanitary Sewer Sub -Element Figure 3.A.2 WWTF Capacity vs. Demand ApoR WWTF Capacity vs. Demand 20.00 19.00 SM 18.00 12.85 12.62 16.00 .62 16.00 14.00 8.85 14.00 14.00 6.00 12.85 12.00 7� T. 4.91 4.70 4.70 5.10 Overall WWiF Capacity 3.89 -� Demand with Concurrency L` 10.00 u m m -.- Demand W/0 Conurre rcy 8.00 U 6.00 4.00 2.00 0.00 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 ApoR 12.85 12.62 .62 11.60 8.00 8.85 87 9.60 6.00 5.72 7� T. 4.91 4.70 4.70 5.10 3.89 To ensure sufficient capacity through 2030, the county should take the following steps: • Begin planning and preliminary design for expansion when a plant's Average Daily Demand is projected to equal or exceed its capacity within 5 years; • Prepare plans and specifications for expansion when a plant's Average Daily Demand is projected to equal or exceed its capacity within 4 years; • Submit a complete construction permit application to the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) for expansion when a plant's Average Daily Demand is projected to equal or exceed its capacity within 3 years; and • Submit an application for an operation permit for the expanded facility to DEP when a plant's Average Daily Demand is projected to equal or exceed its capacity within 6 months. Taking these steps within the referenced timeframes will ensure that the county has sufficient time to design, permit, and construct needed plant capacity. At the same time, these timeframes decrease the chances that plants will have many years of unused capacity. A list of sanitary sewer capital improvements is provided in the Capital Improvements Element (CIE) of the county's comprehensive plan�dprevided in Appendix "A" of this -sub -elem�t. Since the county's CIE must be updated annually, projects completed will be dropped from the list of capital improvements and new projects will be added as needed. Community Development Department Indian River County 37 dix A Comprehensive Plan Sanitary Sewer Sub -Element Within the county, a number of existing residential developments are not connected to the county sanitary sewer system. If all unserved developments were connected to the regional sanitary sewer system, there would be significant additional wastewater treatment demand. For a number of reasons, however, most unserved developments will never connect to the regional system. In many cases, septic systems are adequate to accommodate individual single family houses, and there is no need to retrofit existing subdivisions with sanitary sewer lines. Where subdivisions are served by a centralized potable water system, there are seldom problems caused by lots having individual septic tanksss sy tems. Given the high cost of retrofitting existing subdivisions with sanitary sewer lines and given the limited benefits of connecting, it is unlikely that many existing subdivisions will be retrofitted with sewers in the future. There are, however, some circumstances where connecting existing subdivisions to the sanitary sewer system would be beneficial. Those circumstances mostly relate to a subdivision's proximity to a waterbody. Because septic tanks sy tems can leach pollutants and those pollutants can impact the ocean, the Indian River Lagoon, the St. Sebastian River, or other surface water bodies, the county has an interest in promoting the connection of waterfront subdivisions to the sanitary sewer system. In the future, the county should continue to offer its assessment program that provides sanitary sewer to those neighborhoods where individuals benefiting from the connection to the sanitary sewer system pay for the cost of service expansion. Wastewater Needs and Land Use With the 1990 adoption of the comprehensive plan, the county established its urban service area. The intent of the comprehensive plan is to direct most growth into that area and to provide urban type services to development in the urban service area. Since adoption of the 1990 comprehensive plan, the regional wastewater collection system has been extended to all commercial/industrial areas in the county, including the three I-95 commercial/industrial nodes. As a result of that expansion, the development potential of land within the urban service area has greatly increased for both residential and commercial/industrial projects. Although the regional sanitary sewer system service area has been greatly expanded, there are still several areas such as Oslo Park, Vero Lake Estates, Paradise Park and other areas which are not yet served. In the future, the county should evaluate whether or not unserved areas should be connected to the regional sanitary sewer system. Community Development Department Indian River County 38 Apotfidix A Comprehensive Plan Private Treatment Plants Sanitary Sewer Sub -Element As indicated in the background section of this Sub -Element, the reason that the cEounty started direct provision of wastewater treatment services was due to problems at private package treatment facilities. In many cases, the problems with private plants were due to the operational aspects of the plant, rather than with the plant itself. Because of those problems and their environmental impacts, the County Utilities Department has decommissioned all but four private plants. Customers formerly served by private plants that have been decommissioned have been connected to the county system. To avoid a repeat of past problems, to ensure the financial viability of the regional system, and to discourage urban sprawl, new package treatment plants are generally prohibited within the urban service area. Consistent with the provisions of the Future Land Use Element of this plan, package treatment plants or connection to the regional system may be allowed outside of the urban service area to serve development projects that meet the following specific criteria: • clustering of residential development within agricultural areas; • clustering of residential development within privately owned upland conservation areas; • clustering development within mixed use districts; or • traditional neighborhood design communities. • agricultural businesses and industries (including biofuel facilities) In the future, the county will continue to maintain and enforce the above referenced policies. EFFLUENT DISPOSAL Another wastewater treatment issue concerns long range plans for effluent disposal. With respect to effluent disposal, the county has several alternatives. Those alternatives include requiring new commercial and/or residential development to use reuse water, retrofitting existing development to use reuse water, or creating wetlands with reuse water. While retrofitting existing development is, by a large margin, the most expensive of these options, requiring that new development accommodate reuse water is somewhat less expensive. In fact, new commercial areas are currently required to accommodate reuse lines. Even some single-family and multiple -family residential developers, although not required to, have chosen to incur the extra expense of building their projects to accommodate reuse water. Currently, reuse through spray irrigation is the county's primary effluent disposal method. This method is consistent with the county's emphasis to conserve potable water. For that reason, the ,County uUtilities dDepartment is planning to modify the county's sanitary sewer system Community Development Department Indian River County 39 A-H&dix A Comprehensive Plan Sanitary Sewer Sub -Element connection regulations to require that all new subdivisions of 25 or more lots within one-quarter of a mile of an existing re -use line connect to the re -use line for irrigation purposes. Perhaps the most successful and efficient effluent reuse method currently used by the county is at the West County Plant. At that site, a ±165 acre man-made wetland has been created and maintained with effluent from the plant. Besides the creation of habitat for many species of plants and animals, the benefits of that method of effluent disposal include greatly decreased operating costs. Although the wetland at the West County Plant is adjacent to the plant, such man-made wetlands are not required to be located near a treatment plant. If not located near a plant, however, they must be located near a reuse water transmission line. Because the long term benefit of developing such wetlands may outweigh the initial land acquisition and construction costs, the county should begin studying the feasibility of developing additional wetlands. SUMMARY OF ANALYSIS Currently, the county's sanitary sewer system is meeting the needs of the community. There is, however, a need to expand the regional wastewater treatment system. That expansion is needed to meet the demand of projected population growth through 2030, and is currently planned to occur with incremental plant expansions. While the county's wastewater system works well, septic tames i sy tems are still an issue. In the future, the county needs to ensure that even fewer new units use septic taal£ss sy tems, while also connecting existing septic tames s� tems users to the regional system where problems exist. To address the thousands of existing septic ta&sssy tems, the county and Health Department need to evaluate the feasibility of establishing a mandatory septic tankl sy tem maintenance system. Although the county has successfully extended sewer lines within the urban service area, the county needs to continue to expand its collection system to serve the entire urban service area. Along with that, the county needs to expand its reuse system. Appendix A 466 Community Development Department Indian River County 40 Comprehensive Plan Sanitary Sewer Sub -Element GOAL, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES GOAL Indian River County shall have an efficient system of sanitary sewer disposal that prevents degradation of existing resources, promotes orderly growth and development, and meets existing and projected demands. OBJECTIVE 1 Service Concurrent with Development Through the time horizon of the plan, there will be sufficient capacity in the regional sanitary sewer system to accommodate all new development within the urban service area. POLICY 1.1: New development within the unincorporated portion of Indian River County shall be approved only when capacity is available, either on-site or off-site, to provide needed sanitary sewer service. POLICY 1.2: Th DEP, on an annual basis, shall inspect all private wastewater treatment plants in Indian River County. POLICY 1.3: The county hereby adopts a sanitary sewer level of service standard of 250 gallons per day per equivalent residential unit with a peak monthly flow factor of 1.25. That standard shall be utilized for determining the availability of facility capacity and the demand generated by a development. POLICY 1.4: Through its computerized permit tracking and its concurrency management system, the county shall continue to implement procedures to update facility demand and capacity information as development orders and permits are issued. POLICY 1.5: The Planning Division, on an as needed basis, shall provide summary reports containing capacity and demand information for each public wastewater treatment plant within the county service area. POLICY 1.6: Consistent with the county's water and wastewater connection matrix, the county shall continue to allow the use of septic tank systems in rural areas for single- family units and for domestic waste disposal by small retail establishments. The use of septic systems must be approved by the Health Department and be consistent with Rule 64E-6, FAC. Appendix A 467 Community Development Department Indian River County 41 Comprehensive Plan Sanitary Sewer Sub -Element OBJECTIVE 2 Regional System Expansion/Correction of Deficiencies By 2025 241-5, at least 60-50% of all existing --es' runts in the county's service area will be connected to the county:s a -regional sanitary sewer system. This will be an increase from 52.7% 44% in 20172006: POLICY 2.1: The county shall continue to offer the utility assessment program to areas with septic sen,iee-s, stems within the County Utilities Department service area. POLICY 2.2: The county shall continue to offer up to 10 year financing for all utility assessments. POLICY 2.3: The county shall give -n priority for the provision of public sanitary sewer services to the subdivisions on the list of subdivisions as identified in Table 3.A.3 designated as requiring sanitary sewer service due to public health threats by DOH. POLICY 2.4: The county shall provideup blic sanitary sewer service to areas where the lack of such service is determined to be a public health threat and shall initiate sewer projects where feasible to serve subdivisions served by septic systems and identified in Table 3.A.3.1 as posing a disproportionately high potential negative impact on Indian River Lagoon water quality. The county shall recover costs through those connecting to the system and directly benefitting from the improvement. POLICY 2.5: Consistent with its interlocal agreements with the City of Sebastian and the Town of Orchid, the county shall provide sanitary sewer services to those municipalities. .. ._ WE POLICY 2.6: By 2018, the count shall hall perform a financial analysis for septic to sewer conversion projects. Based on that analysis and available funding a specific list of subdivisions to be connected to public sanitary sewer system by certain dates will be identified Appendix A 468 Community Development Department Indian River County 42 Comprehensive Plan Sanitary Sewer Sub -Element POLICY 2.7: By 2028, the county shall provide sanitary sewer service to at least five (5) subdivisions identified in Table 3.A.3.1 as posing a disproportionately high potential negative impact on Indian River Lagoon water quality. The county shall recover costs through those connecting to the system and directly benefitting from the improvement. OBJECTIVE 3 Surface Water and Groundwater Ouality Through the time horizon of the plan, the county will have no instances of sanitary sewer facilities contaminating surface water or groundwater resources. POLICY 3.1: The DOH -Indian River shall conduct annual inspections of septic tanks -s systems are associated with heavy commercial, industrial, and manufacturing or equivalent uses. The results of these inspections AA -MU be used to conjunction with other items in prioritizing sanitary sewer service expansion. POLICY 3.2: The county shall regularly monitor all centralized sanitary sewer facilities to ensure that they do not contaminate surface water or groundwater resources. POLICY 3.3: To ensure that hazardous waste is not discharged into ground or surface water, theCD DOH -Indian River shall requirgeea&et ran samplings of on-site sewage systems for businesses which have been identified as hazardous waste generators suspected of illegal discharges. Violators shall be prosecuted according to federal, state and/or local regulations. OBJECTIVE 4 Water Conservation Through the time horizon of the plan, 100% of the wastewater effluent produced by the county centralized sanitary sewer facilities will be reused. POLICY 4.1: The county shall continue to reuse wastewater by spray irrigation, with percolation ponds and wetlands as back-up. POLICY 4.2: The county shall r-equir-eencourage large volume irrigation users, such as developments with golf courses, to use reuse water for spray irrigation. POLICY 4.3: The county shall continue to enforce Land Development Regulations that require developments that use treated wastewater for spray irrigation to construct and dedicate to the county the effluent transmission lines needed to transport the effluent to the development. Appendix A 469 Community Development Department Indian River County 43 Comprehensive Plan Sanitary Sewer Sub -Element POLICY 4.4: The county shall require all new subdivisions or residential projects of 25 or more lots/units within one-quarter of a mile of an existing re -use line to connect to the re -use line when capacity, exists. OBJECTIVE 5 Capital Improvements By 2812022, the county will have completed the sanitary sewer improvements listed in the county's 5 year Capital Improvements Program in order to maximize the use of existing facilities and discourage urban sprawl (current Five Year Capital Improvements Plan Appendix Ais in the Capital Improvements Element of the comprehensive plan). POLICY 5.1: In conformance with the review process for the Capital Improvements Element—of this p! , the county shall maintain a five-year schedule of capital improvement needs for public facilities. POLICY 5.2: Proposed capital improvement projects shall be evaluated and ranked according to the following three priority level guidelines: • Level One - whether the project is needed to protect public health and safety, to fulfill the county's legal commitment to provide facilities and services, or to preserve or achieve full use of existing facilities. Level Two - whether the project increases efficiency of use of existing facilities, prevents or reduces future improvement costs, provides service to developed areas lacking full service or promotes in -fill development. Level Three - whether the project represents a logical extension of facilities and services within the urban service area. POLICY 5.3: In order to guarantee provision of more than the minimum level of service, the county shall take the following steps: • begin planning and preliminary design for expansion when a plant's Average Daily Demand is projected to equal or exceed its capacity within 5 years; prepare plans and specifications for expansion when a plant's Average Daily Demand is projected to equal or exceed its capacity within 4 years; submit a complete construction permit application to the Florida Department of Environmental Protection for expansion when a plant's Average Daily Demand is projected to equal or exceed its capacity within 3 years; and Appendix A 470 Community Development Department Indian River County 44 Comprehensive Plan Sanitary Sewer Sub -Element • submit an application for an operation permit for the expanded facility to DEP when a plant's Average Daily Demand is projected to equal or exceed its capacity within 6 months. POLICY 5.4: The county shall treat sanitary sewer provision as an enterprise system which is financially self-supporting. POLICY 5.5: The County Utilities Department shall fund sanitary sewer capital improvements and expansions through user fees, impaet f�escapacity charges, developer's agreements, assessments and other appropriate fees and funding mechanisms. POLICY 5.6: The county shall identifypursue opportunities for state and federal seuFees f funding available for the improvement and expansion of utility services including septic to sewer conversion projects and sewer connections. POLICY 5.7: All improvements, replacement, expansion, or increase in capacity of county facilities shall be consistent with adopted level of service standards for facilities. POLICY 5.8: Consistent with the policies of the Future Land Use Element of this plan, provision of centralized sanitary sewer service shall be limited to the following areas: • Areas within the Urban Service Area; • Areas where the county has legal commitments to provide facilities and services as of the date of adoption of this plan; , • Areas outside of the Urban Service Area where at least a portion of the site is contiguous to an Urban Service Area boundary as depicted on the Official Future Land Use Map or where located no more than 500 feet from an existing sanitary sewer line that is part of the county sanitary sewer system, or where an approved place of worship or camp/retreat use existed on January 1, 2016 and is approved for water and/or sewer service by Utility Services in conjunction with a utility construction/connection permit filed with Utility Services on or before June 30, 2016. These areas are subject to the following provisions: o The maximum density of such land shall be as shown on the Future Land Use Map, and the provision of centralized sanitary sewer service shall not be justification for an increase in maximum density; and o Any and all costs associated with connecting a property to the sanitary sewer system, including costs associated with survey, design, Appendix A 471 Community Development Department Indian River County 45 Comprehensive Plan Sanitary Sewer Sub -Element permitting, line extensions, construction, pumps and lift stations, restoration, inspections, and certification, shall be borne by the owner of the property. • Development projects located outside of the Urban Service Area that meet the criteria of the policies of the Future Land Use Element for: o clustering of residential development within agricultural; o clustering of residential development within privately owned upland conservation areas; o clustered development within mixed use districts; o traditional neighborhood design communities; o public facilities such as public schools; and o agricultural businesses and industries (including biofuel facilities) • Areas where, consistent with Sanitary Sewer Sub -Element Policy 2.4, the lack of centralized sanitary sewer service is determined to be a public health threat. POLICY 5.9: The county shall install automatic air release valves in all new sewer lines. OBJECTIVE 6 Package Treatment Plants Through the time horizon of the plan, there shall be -no instances of package treatment plant failures, or illegal or unsafe package treatment plant discharges. POLICY 6.1: The county shall limit the use of package wastewater treatment systems to areas that meet the following criteria governing connection to the county sanitary sewer system: • Development served by existing package treatment plants may continue to treat their sewage in that manner until centralized service becomes available. At that time, all development within '/ mile of a county sewer line shall be connected to the county system. Development whose sewage treatment systems causes a public health problem must connect to the regional system regardless of the distance to sewer lines. • Package treatment plants shall be allowed in areas of development outside of the Urban Service Area when such development meets the criteria of policies of the Future Land Use Element for: o clustering of residential development within agricultural areas; Appendix A 472 Community Development Department Indian River County 46 Comprehensive Plan Sanitary Sewer Sub -Element o clustering of residential development within privately owned upland conservation areas; o clustering development within mixed use districts; o tradition neighborhood design communities; or o agricultural businesses and industries (including biofuel facilities) POLICY 6.2: The county shall ensure that, prior to the issuance of development orders or permits, the applicant has demonstrated that the project complies with applicable federal, state, and local permit requirements for package treatment plants. POLICY 6.3: The county shall require that issuance of permits for replacement or expansion of existing package treatment plants be conditioned upon compliance with the most updated version of DEP regulatory requirements and Federal and State water quality standards as identified in the "Regulatory Framework" section of the sub -element. POLICY 6.4: To ensure proper maintenance and operation, the Utilities Depal4"'e^* shall DEP shall inspect all package treatment plants on an annual basis. POLICY 6.5: The county shall require all new package wastewater treatment plants to be built according to current federal, state, and county requirements. In addition to obtaining a county permit demonstrating compliance with county regulations, any developer building and operating a package wastewater treatment plant must obtain a state permit demonstrating compliance with state and federal regulations. Those regulations include but are not limited to the Federal Water Pollution Control Act of 1972 (PL 92-500) and its amendments through the Clean Water Acts of 1977 (PL 95-217) and 1981 (PL 97-117), Chapters 381 and 403 of the Florida Statutes, and Rules 17-3 and 17-6 of the Florida Administrative Code. Both state and county permits are required for the construction of a plant, and for any future expansion or modification of a plant. POLICY 6.6: At the time the county approves any new package treatment plants, the county will require, that at the time deemed appropriate by the county, the package treatment plant and associated sewer collection system shall be dedicated to the county for operation and maintenance without compensation. POLICY 6.7: The county shall continue to enforce ordinances requiring pre-treatment of commercial and industrial waste before discharge into the county system. POLICY 6.8: The county shall require all future connections to the regional sanitary sewer system to be consistent with the attached water and wastewater connection matrix. Appendix A 473 Community Development Department Indian River County 47 Comprehensive Plan Sanitary Sewer Sub -Element OBJECTIVE 7 Septic T7antl-Systems By 2020, the number of new septic tank -systems permitted annually will not exceed -4-50200. POLICY 7.1: The county shall limit the use of septic tank -systems to areas that meet the following criteria governing connection to the county sanitary sewer system: Alith- the exeeption of these Wden.4-fi-ed- in. Table 3.A.3, r-esiden;ial subdivisions sefved bye)iisting s .tetie tank systems «. .,rims, to t. e t their- sewage in that Commercial/industrial uses and residential subdivisions identified in Table 3.A.3 may continue to treat their sewage with existing septic tank systems until centralized sewer service lines are extended to within '/ mile of the site. At that time, all residential units in those subdivisions and all commercial/industrial uses shall be connected to the county system. Developments whose sewage treatment systems cause a public health problem must connect to the regional system regardless of the distance to sewer lines. Use of septic tank -systems for new development shall be prohibited unless: o such development meets the criteria set on the water and wastewater connection matrix; or o such development consists of clustered residential development within privately owned upland conservation (C-3) areas. Even under those circumstances, no individual septic tank systems may be associated with individual residential units. If located outside of any conservation designated areas or areas that are environmentally sensitive or significant, however, centralized community septic tank systems may be provided to each pod of clustered residential development. o Septic tank -systems shall be allowed in areas of development outside of the Urban Service Area when such development meets the criteria of policies of the Future Land Use Element for: - clustered residential development within agricultural planned development projects; - clustered development within new town projects; - traditional neighborhood design communities; and - agricultural businesses and industries (including biofuel facilities) Appendix A 474 Community Development Department Indian River County 48 Comprehensive Plan Sanitary Sewer Sub -Element POLICY 7.2: The county shall ensure that, prior to the issuance of development orders or permits for projects to be served by septic tank systems, the applicant has demonstrated that the project complies with Florida Department of Health (DOH) regulations Section 381.0065 FS -and Chapter 64E-6, FAC, permit requirements for septic -systems. POLICY 7.3: The county in coordination with and through the DOH -Indian River, shall require that issuance of permits for repair or replacement of existing septic taf&systems be conditioned upon compliance with the -nest-updated ver-s}en-of DEP Fegulatery requifements and Federal and State water- "alitys andaMs as ;dentinedi iin e " element—.with DOH regulations Section 381.0065 FS and Chapter 64E-6, FAC, permit requirements for septic systems. POLICY 7.4: The county, in coordination with and through the BDOH-Indian River, shall establish public education programs on the proper use, inspection requirements, maintenance, and abandonment of septic tats isy tems. The aseptic system abandonment process shall be based on current state and local regulations. POLICY 7.5: Consistent with Section 381.00651 FS and in coordination with and through the DOH -Indian River, the County shall encourage a voluntaLY opt -in provision for septic system maintenance and encourage contractors that provide septic maintenance to document information. POLICY 7.6: The County, in coordination with and through the DOH -Indian River, shall encourage all septic systems including repairs and modifications to meet a 24 inch separation between the bottom of the drainfield and the wet season water table and meet 75 foot setbacks from surface waterbodies and wells. Appendix A 475 Community Development Department Indian River County 49 Comprehensive Plan Sanitary Sewer Sub -Element PLAN IMPLEMENTATION An important part of any plan is its implementation. Implementation involves execution of the plan's policies. It involves taking actions and achieving results. For the Sanitary Sewer Sub -Element, implementation involves various activities. While some of these actions will be ongoing, others are activities that will be taken by certain points in time. For each policy in this element, Table 3.A.6 identifies the type of action required, the responsible entity for taking the action, the timing, and whether or not the policy necessitates a capital expenditure. To implement the Sanitary Sewer Sub -Element, several different types of actions must be taken. These include: expansion of plant capacity, extension of the collection network, enforcement of land development regulations and ordinances, execution of interlocal agreements, coordination, and preparation of studies and evaluation and monitoring reports. Overall plan implementation responsibility will rest with the planning department. Besides its responsibilities as identified in Table 3.A.6, the planning department has the additional responsibility of ensuring that other entities discharge their responsibilities. This will entail notifying other applicable departments of capital expenditures to be included in their budgets, notifying other departments and groups of actions that must be taken, and assisting other departments and agencies in their plan implementation responsibilities. Appendix A 476 Community Development Department Indian River County 50 Comprehensive Plan Sanitary Sewer Sub -Element TABLE 3.A.6 - SANITARY SEWER SUB -ELEMENT IMPLEMENTATION MATRIX POLICY# TYPE OF ACTION RESPONSIBILITY TIMING CAPITAL EXPEND. 1.1 Land Development Regulations Planning Ongoing NO 1.2 Monitoring Procedures U414ie-sDEP Ongoing NO 1.3 Land Development Regulations Planning Ongoing NO 1.4 Monitoring Procedures Utilities/Planning Ongoing NO 1.5 Summary Reports Planning As Needed NO 1.6 Land Development Regulations Utilities/DOH - INDIAN RIVER Ongoing NO 2.1 Service Provision Utilities Ongoing YES 2.2 Service Provision Utilities Ongoing NO 2.3 Evaluation Process/ Service Provision Utilities/ DDOH - INDIAN RIVER Ongoing YES 2.4 Evaluation Process/ Service Provision Utilities/IDOH - INDIAN RIVER Ongoing YES 2.5 Coordination Utilities/BCC Ongoing NO 2.6 Feasibility StudySeptic to Sewer Study Utilities4 aP&i*g Ongoing NO 2.7 New Service to Existing Utilities Ongoing YES Subdivisions on Septic Systems 3.1 Annual Inspections TRGZHPDOH - INDIAN RIVER Ongoing NO 3.2 Monitoring Procedures Utilities I Ongoing NO 3.3 Monitoring Procedures DOH - INDIAN RIVER Ongoing NO 4.1 Reuse Water by Spray Irrigation Utilities Ongoing NO 4.2 Land Development Regulations Utilities Ongoing NO 4.3 Land Development Regulations Utilities Ongoing NO 4.4 Land Development Regulations Utilities Ongoing NO Appendix A 477 Community Development Department Indian River County 51 Comprehensive Plan Sanitary Sewer Sub -Element POLICY# TYPE OF ACTION RESPONSIBILITY TIMING CAPITAL EXPEND. 5.1 CIP Maintenance Finance/Utilities Ongoing NO 5.2 CIP Evaluation & Finance/Utilities Ongoing NO Prioritization 5.3 Capacity Monitoring & Utilities Ongoing YES Plant Expansion 5.4 Land Development Finance/Utilities Ongoing NO Regulations 5.5 Land Development Utilities Ongoing YES Regulations 5.6 Funding Mechanism Utilities/Finance Ongoing NO 5.7 Improvement/ Utilities Ongoing YES Replacement/Expansion 5.8 Land Development Utilities/Planning Ongoing NO Regulations 5.9 Installation of Air Utilities Ongoing Yes Release Valves 6.1 Land Development Utilities/Planning Ongoing NO Regulations 6.2 Land Development Utilities/Planning Ongoing NO Regulations 6.3 Land Development Utilities/Planning/ IRC�IDDOH Ongoing NO Regulations - INDIAN RIVER 6.4 Plant Inspections khilitiesDEP Ongoing NO 6.5 Land Development Utilities/Planning Ongoing NO Regulations 6.6 Land Development Utilities/Planning Ongoing NO Regulations 6.7 Land Development Utilities Ongoing NO - Regulations 6.8 Land Development Utilities/Planning Ongoing NO Regulations 7.1 Land Development Utilities/Planning Ongoing NO Regulations 7.2 Land Development Utilities/Planning/ 1RG DOH Ongoing NO Regulations - INDIAN RIVER Appendix A 478 Community Development Department Indian River County 52 Comprehensive Plan Sanitary Sewer Sub -Element POLICY# TYPE OF ACTION RESPONSIBILITY TIMING CAPITAL EXPEND. 7.3 Land Development Regulations Utilities/Planning/ IRC14DDOH - INDIAN RIVER Ongoing NO 7.4 Public Education Program Utilities/ IRCHDDOH - INDIAN RIVER Ongoing NO 7.5 Septic Maintenance and DOH - INDIAN RIVER Ongoing NO Reporting 7.6 Septic System Improvements DOH - INDIAN RIVER Ongoing NO Appendix A 479 Community Development Department Indian River County 53 Comprehensive Plan Sanitary Sewer Sub -Element EVALUATION AND MONITORING PROCEDURES To be effective, a plan must not only provide a means for implementation; it must also provide a mechanism for assessing the plan's effectiveness. Generally a plan's effectiveness can be judged by the degree to which the plan's objectives have been met. Since objectives are measurable and have specific timeframes, the plan's objectives are the benchmarks used as a basis to evaluate the plan. Table 3.A.7 identifies each of the objectives of the Sanitary Sewer Sub -Element. It also identifies the measures to be used to evaluate progress in achieving these objectives. Most of these measures are quantitative. Besides the measures, Table 3.A.7 also identifies timeframes associated with meeting the objectives. The utilities department staff will be responsible for monitoring and evaluating the Sanitary Sewer Sub -Element. This will involve collection of data and compilation of information regarding facility capacity, expansion, and new development permitted. This will be done on a regular basis. As part of the county's concurrency management system, the county will continually monitor facility capacity to ensure that wastewater level -of -service standards will be maintained. While monitoring will occur on a continual basis, formal evaluation of the Sanitary Sewer Sub - Element will occur every five years in conjunction with the formal evaluation and appraisal of the entire comprehensive plan. Besides assessing progress, the evaluation and appraisal process will also be used to determine whether the Sanitary Sewer Sub -Element objectives should be modified or expanded. In this way the monitoring and evaluation of the Sanitary Sewer Sub - Element will not only provide a means of determining the degree of success of the plan's implementation; it will also provide a mechanism for evaluating needed changes to the plan element. Appendix A 480 Community Development Department Indian River County 54 Comprehensive Plan Sanitary Sewer Sub -Element TABLE 3.A.7 - SANITARY SEWER SUB -ELEMENT EVALUATION MATRIX OBJECTIVE # MEASURE TIMEFRAME 1 Availability of Sufficient Capacity Through the time horizon of the plan, 2 % connected to regional system By 284-52020 3 # of instances of sanitary sewer facilities contaminating surface water or groundwater resources Through the time horizon of the plan 4 % of wastewater effluent reused Through the time horizon of the plan 5 Completed improvements Through the time horizon of the plan 6 # of package treatment plant failures and # of illegal or unsafe package treatment plant discharges Through the time horizon of the plan 7 # of new septic systems permitted annually By 2020 Appendix A 481 Community Development Department Indian River County 55 Comprehensive Plan Sanitary Sewer Sub -Element TABLE 3.A.8 - WATER & WASTEWATER CONNECTION MATRIX FOR NEW DEVELOPMENT * Daily flow refers to water consumption or sewer generation. **The applicant for any development project, where such project will not connect to a centralized system, must sign a developer's agreement with the Indian River County Utilities Department to operate on a private system with a commitment to connect to the regional system when service is available. These agreements shall be conditioned upon demonstration of compliance with applicable federal, state, and local permit requirements. When using a private system or on-site facilities, the developer must construct a dry line or wet line at the time of construction, if required by the Utilities Department. The final determination for the type of Appendix A 482 Community Development Department Indian River County 56 Inside of the Urban Service Area Connect Not Connect Single Family: Within 200' of system X Outside of 200' of system X** Residential Projects: Subdivision, multi -family, site plan, PD, DRI Within'/ mile of the system 25 units or more X Less than 25 units X Outside of'/ mile of system 25 units or more X Less than 25 units X** Non -Residential Projects: Subdivision, site plan, PD, DRI Within'/ mile of system 2,000 gallons daily flow or more* X Less than 2,000 gallons daily flow* X Outside of % mile of system 2,000 gallons daily flow or more* X Less than 2,000 gallons daily flow* X** * Daily flow refers to water consumption or sewer generation. **The applicant for any development project, where such project will not connect to a centralized system, must sign a developer's agreement with the Indian River County Utilities Department to operate on a private system with a commitment to connect to the regional system when service is available. These agreements shall be conditioned upon demonstration of compliance with applicable federal, state, and local permit requirements. When using a private system or on-site facilities, the developer must construct a dry line or wet line at the time of construction, if required by the Utilities Department. The final determination for the type of Appendix A 482 Community Development Department Indian River County 56 Comprehensive Plan Sanitary Sewer Sub -Element non-residential establishment which can utilize a private system shall be made by the Utilities Department, Community Development Department, and DOH — Indian River. System Availability: A system is considered available when a collection or distribution line exists in a public easement or right-of-way. Distance Determination: Distance determinations are made from the nearest point of the project (area of development) to the public facility directly through public easements or public rights-of- way. FACommunity Development\Comprehensive Plan Text Amendments\2017 Sewer Policy Update\Agenda Items\PH #2 - BCC Transmittal Review\Appendix A\9 Chapter 3A Sanitary Sewer Sub -Element Working Copy - BCC Transmittal Hearing.doc Appendix A 483 Community Development Department Indian River County 57 terrace extends into and beyond the northwest corner of the county and reaches elevations of approximately 40 feet above sea level. The topography of the county is depicted in Figure 2.17. Overall, the relatively flat terrain of the county poses few constraints to development as compared to a rough or rugged terrain. The topography is also a key feature in the natural drainage system and must be examined along with other natural features to identify development opportunities and constraints. These potential opportunities and constraints are addressed in the analysis section of this element and examined in the Conservation, Coastal Mana eg ment, and Infrastructure Elements. Soils Soils can greatly influence the value or development potential of land. On farmland, those soils which are rich in nutrients provide the potential for high crop yields, while other soils require extensive fertilization and treatment. Generally, structures cannot be built on soils with poor load bearing capacity unless costly methods are employed to overcome the problem. Soils can also severely limit the use of sanitary facilities such as sep66 tank tic stems and landfills. While wet soils often cannot accommodate septic teak c systems, ground water can be polluted in highly permeable soils. Those soils with high water tables may also indicate the existence of a wetland vegetative community. In Indian River County, the United States Soil Conservation Service has identified 58 different soil types. These soils are further classified into thirteen generalized soil types and distributed among five physiographic areas of the county as follows: sand ridges; coastal islands and tidal marshes; flatwoods, low knolls and ridges; sloughs, poorly defined drainage ways and hammocks; and freshwater swamps and marshes. The generalized soil types are depicted in Figure 2.18. The suitability of soils for development is discussed in the analysis section of this element and in greater detail in the Conservation and Coastal Management Elements. Future Land Use Element 46 Appendig4 A Water transportation is provided on the Intracoastal Waterway in the Indian River Lagoon. This federally maintained water route traverses the length of the county. The nearest deepwater ports are located at Ft. Pierce to the south and Port Canaveral to the north. In Indian River County, rail service is provided by the Florida East Coast Railroad (FEC). The FEC maintains single and double tracks just west of and parallel to US 1. The nearest FEC freight yard is in Ft. Pierce. Aviation, Ports, and Rail issues are also discussed in the Transportation Element. Sanitary Sewer Generally, wastewater is a service that has traditionally been supplied by local government. In addition to the more technologically sophisticated and efficient central systems, traditional methods of wastewater treatment, including aseptic systems, are still employed in Indian River County. The primary purpose of wastewater treatment is to remove solids and toxic chemicals from wastewater and render organic wastes inert. After treatment, the resulting water product is then reintroduced into the natural water cycle. Presently, there are five publicly operated regional wastewater treatment plants operating in the county. Four of those plants are operated by the Indian River County Utilities Department, while the other plant is operated by the City of Vero Beach. There are also three privately -operated package treatment plants in the county. While the county operated plants provide a level of service of 250 gallons/residential unit/day, the city operated plant provides a level of service of 197 gallons/residential unit/day. The combined design capacity of the regional plants is 13,370,000 17,350,000 gallons/day, an amount sufficient to accommodate their combined average daily demand of -g -,294 -,ON 8,780,000 gallons/day. Currently, the service area of the regional system includes substantial portions of the urban area of the county. As such, wastewater lines extend to much of the county's urban area, including portions of all three of the commercial/industrial nodes along I-95. In 2006, the county utilities department hada-,2 0 28,167 sanitary sewer customers. With respect to septie-4ankseptic s sus, the Department of Health in Indian River County (DOH -Indian Rlver)Dubli , Health Unit, Division of &,,,;,.,,fl ental Healtw, currently estimates that there are „pr,.^.,:v,,atel , more than 36,039 septic tank c s stems in use in Indian River County. While approximately4,47-2121 new septie-tankseptic s sus were installed in 20016 in the county, that number has decreased significantly in more recent years as the level of residential construction has declined. Future Land Use Element 63 Appendix 4A Within the county, many of the older residential areas were developed with well and septic tank systems on lots which, by today's standards, are small in size. The small lot size in those areas often results in inadequate separation distances between wells and septic tankseptic systems. For that reason, some of those areas have experienced contamination of wells. To address that health problem, county policy has been to connect those areas to the regional potable water system. Because connection to the regional potable water system is usually sufficient to eliminate health risks, connection of those areas to the regional sanitary sewer system has been on a much more limited basis. Wastewater and sanitary sewer systems are addressed more fully in the Sanitary Sewer Sub - Element of the Infrastructure Element and in the Capital Improvements Element. The impact of those systems is also addressed in the Conservation Element. Potable Water Water is essential to human life and is a key ingredient in agriculture, commerce and industry. Traditionally, water in urban areas has been provided by local governments, while in rural areas individual wells or water systems have sufficed. This pattern is also present in Indian River County; however, it is not uniform in all areas of the county. In Indian River County, the water delivery system is composed of private wells and public water systems. The potable water system is discussed in greater detail in the Potable Water Sub - Element and the Capital Improvements Element. Groundwater sources are discussed in the Natural Groundwater Aquifer Recharge Sub -Element and the Conservation Element. As with the county's population distribution, water systems other than private wells are primarily limited to the developed eastern third of the county land area. Currently, there are four publicly owned regional water treatment plants operating in the county. Two of those plants are operated by the Indian River County Utilities Department, while the other plants are operated by the City of Vero Beach and the City of Fellsmere. While the county -operated plants provide a level of service of 250 gallons/residential unit/day, the Vero Beach and Fellsmere plants provide a level of service of 351 and 200 gallons/residential unit/day, respectively. The combined design capacity of those plants is 24,720,000 gallons/day, an amount sufficient to accommodate their combined average daily demand of 15,990,000 gallons/day. The plants operated by the county Utilities Department use the Floridan Aquifer as their primary water source. While the City of Vero Beach uses both the Surficial and Floridan Aquifers, the City of Fellsmere uses only the Surficial Aquifer. Because water drawn from the Floridan Aquifer contains impurities, that water must be treated to become potable. For water drawn from the Floridan Aquifer, the type of treatment used by both the city and county plants is reverse osmosis. For water drawn from the Surficial Aquifer, a lime softening treatment process is used. A by-product of the reverse osmosis process is brine; brine is water with a high concentration of impurities. That brine is then treated prior to being discharged. Future Land Use Element 64 AppendiYS6 A Future Land Use Map, the 106,661 units projected at build -out represent fewer units than the maximum allowed by the Future Land Use Map. If single-family development continues to occur at densities substantially less than the maximum allowed by the by Future Land Use Map, then it can be expected that the unincorporated county's build -out potential will be reduced in the future. Currently, comprehensive plan policies direct the vast majority of residential development to land inside the urban service area. Of the projected 106,661 residential units at build -out, 96,029 units (or 90%) will be located inside the urban service area. The remaining 10,632 units will be located outside of the urban service area. Because of the recent municipal annexations and the future land use plan densities expected to be assigned to those annexed areas, the build -out potential for the total county has increased significantly. Upon build -out, it is projected that the unincorporated county and the county's municipalities will contain 188,848 residential units. At that time, the county's five municipalities will contain 82,187 residential units. Of these residential units, 49,474 residential units will be in the City of Fellsmere, while the remaining 32,713 residential units will be located in the county's other municipalities. Use Suitability of Soil Within the county, soils can limit development activity in two major ways: load bearing capacity and suitability for sanitary facilities. Those characteristics are addressed in the United States Department of Agriculture Soil Conservation Service's soil survey for Indian River County. In addition to mapping the different soils, the survey also provides an analysis of the soils. The analysis, which includes the physical, chemical, and hydric composition of each soil type, provides a basis to evaluate the soil potential for different uses. Table 2.12 is a summary of soil ratings and limitations from the Soil Survey. (Soils are also discussed in the Conservation Element). That table indicates that most soils in the county present severe limitations for site development and sanitary facilities. Usually, building limitations are due to the wetness of the soil. The wetness of the soil can result in the ponding of water, flooding and caving of excavation. The wetness also presents severe limitations to sanitary facilities and, in particular, to septics& p is s sus. Since wetness and ponding lead to poor filtering and slow percolation, wet soils are unable to adequately drain. Within the county, those limitations can be reduced through the use of certain building techniques and standards. Those techniques and standards include raising the elevations of sites through the use of fill dirt and enhancing the natural drainage area of development projects. Throughout the county, septie4rilEseptic s sY terns are permitted by the DepaF4neffDOH-Indian River. To ensure that adequate sanitary facilities are provided for sites not connected to the county's centralized sanitary sewer system, county building regulations require the issuance of a septic permit prior to issuance of a building permit. Several standards Future Land Use Element 78 Appendix used by the DOH -Indian River to guarantee the viability of septic systems include: a minimum seytseptic system elevation requirement of 48" above the wet season water table; a minimum separation distance requirement between septic Oinktic s sus and potable water wells of 75 feet; and a limitation on total building square footage based on lot size and drainfield requirements. Because of the limitations associated with on-site septic systems, the county's policy should be to expand the public sanitary system throughout the urban service area. The Sanitary Sewer Sub - Element provides additional analysis of septic ta*kc s sy tem suitability in the county and the regulatory framework under which septic tank c s sus are permitted. Table 2.12, Soil Characteristics and Suitability Soil Drainage Corrosivity Irrigation Septic Fields Dwellings Pond Steel Concrete Poorly Moderate Low to Wetness, Severe limitations — Severe limitations — Severe Drained to High High Droughty, Wetness, Percolates Wetness Limitations — Fast intake slowly Seepage Moderately Low to Low to Wetness, Severe Limitations Slight to Severe Severe Drained Moderate Moderate Droughty, — Percolates slowly, Limitations — Limitations — Fast intake Poor filtering Wetness Seepage Excessively Low Moderate Droughty, Slight — Very poor Slight Severe Drained to High Fast intake, filtration. Potential Limitations — Soil blowing for groundwater Seepage contamination Data Source: U.S.D.A. - Soil Conservation Service Figure 2.26 shows soil characteristics which present severe limitations to development. Use Suitability of Topography The topography of Indian River County is generally flat with the exception of several ridges. Due to the lack of rough or rugged terrain, topography does not present any major limitations to development. Only a few areas along the coastal ridge have slopes steep enough to constrain development. Overall, topography is one of the principal influences on the drainage system. Because much of the county consists of relatively low flatlands, many of those areas, including the highly developed eastern mainland, would be underwater for portions of the year without man-made drainage ditches and canals. There are, however, certain county areas, such as the barrier island, the sand ridges, the St. Sebastian River area, and the higher elevations in the western county, which have a topography that results in the natural runoff of stormwater. Going forward, the county's policy should be to require that stormwater runoff from new development does not negatively impact adjacent properties or receiving water bodies. Because of the county's flat terrain, stormwater management systems are necessary to direct and retain Future Land Use Element 79 Appendix 48; ➢ Groundwater Recharge Areas Underlying Indian River County are two aquifers that provide county residents with all water for domestic consumption. Those aquifers are recharged or filled by the percolation of rain and surface water through soil layers into the underground reservoirs. Those areas which provide the greatest potential for recharge are classified as "Prime Recharge Areas" and are shown on Figure 2.29. While excessive development of those areas can result in changes to natural drainage patterns and reduce recharge potential, excessive use of septic tank is systems and hazardous materials in those areas can increase the possibility of contamination of the aquifer. For the county public water system, the public water supply source is the deep aquifer .which, because of its depth, is less likely to be subject to contamination from ground sources. Recharge areas for that aquifer are located northwest of the county. Within the county, those areas which contain community wells that draw large quantities of water are especially subject to contamination or pollution. Generally, groundwater contamination can result from excessive or improper use of septic systems and other wastewater treatment facilities, the leakage of chemicals and fuels stored underground, seepage from landfills and other waste storage areas, or surface spills of hazardous materials. For each of the community wells or wellfields in the county, zones of influence have been calculated. Those zones vary in size due to the amount or volume of flow, depth of the well and the porosity of the aquifer. Within those zones, the county's policy should restrict uses that could contaminate community wells. Future Land Use Element 85 Appendixx4k ➢ Summary of Use Suitability of Natural Resources Overall, the natural features of the county provide various constraints to development, many of which can be overcome through modern building and engineering techniques. In fact, one natural resource constraint that has been mitigated through engineering is drainage. With respect to drainage, large areas of the county would be underwater, if it were not for the county's extensive system of drainage canals and ditches. In some cases, modifications are relatively simple and provide minimal adverse impacts to the environment. Where only slight modification is required, areas are generally suited for most types of development. Other areas require extensive man made improvements to achieve even the lowest intensity of development. Often those improvements include the wholesale destruction of important and sensitive habitats. In those areas, development should be kept to a minimum and highly regulated to ensure the protection of natural features and resources. Figure.2.30 is a composite of the natural constraints in the county. In those areas which contain severe constraints, the county's policy should be to restrict development. A review of existing development and natural land uses reveals the following important facts: • destruction of natural areas is most evident in the eastern portion of the county, especially waterfront areas along the Indian River and on the barrier island; • continued reliance on septic 4a-nk eptic systems increases the potential for pollution of the shallow aquifer; • the use of septie tanks in soils which are not suited for septie-tankc s stems and development in areas with low elevations require large amounts of fill dirt obtained by mining; • the large amounts of runoff that result from development can lead to the need for expensive drainage improvements, pollution of natural water bodies, and localized flooding; and • development of wetlands, woodlands and other natural areas results in the destruction of natural habitat, upsetting the natural balance of the ecosystem. Wherever development occurs, the natural state of the land is altered, most of it without serious consequences. Certain areas, however, are of such a sensitive nature that their alteration can lead to serious problems for nature and humans alike. In the past, much of the land area of the county was drained and cleared for agriculture. While it is impossible to preserve all natural areas, development policies and land use regulations can and should protect sensitive areas and limit the destruction of the environment. Future Land Use Element 87 Appendix A permit the transfer of development rights, and promote the use of conservation easements, dedications, and public acquisition. Policy 7.4: Any development activity in areas designated as environmentally sensitive or important, as defined in policies 5.4 and 6.11 of the Conservation Element, shall require an environmental survey as part of the approval of a development order. Based upon the results of the environmental survey, development projects shall be required to provide a site design which minimizes impacts upon endangered and threatened plants and animals. Policy 7.5: The county shall review and evaluate proposed development projects to ensure that stormwater runoff from the new development will not negatively impact adjacent properties or receiving surface waterbody quality. Policy 7.6: Indian River County shall maintain and enforce regulations to protect wetlands from the negative impacts of development. These regulations address building setbacks, protection from solid and liquid wastes including pesticides and herbicides, dredging or filling of wetlands, incorporation of wetlands into a site's development scheme, and mitigation of lost or destroyed wetlands. Policy 7.7: Indian River County acknowledges the environmental importance of the prime aquifer recharge areas shown on Figure 2.29. The county shall regulate the development of these areas. Regulations include an overlay district which restricts land uses, implements special siting requirements for septi tank systems to mitigate soil drainage characteristics, and regulates other factors which impact the recharge capability of the land. Policy 7.8: The county shall protect public water supply wells by prohibiting the placement of septic systems; stormwater retention/detention areas; wastewater treatment plant effluent discharges, including but not limited to percolation ponds, surface water discharge, spray irrigation, and drainfields; sanitary landfills, feed lots and other concentrated animal facilities; mining and excavation activities; and the handling, production, and storage of regulated substances within wellfield cones of influence. Policy 7.9: Consistent with the Potable Water Sub -Element, the county shall continue to extend the county water system, enabling the acquisition of small public water systems, thereby reducing the number of residents using the shallow aquifer, which is subject to groundwater pollution threats. Policy 7.10: Through the use of fee simple purchase, transfer of development rights, and conservation easements, Indian River County shall coordinate with other state, federal and local agencies to identify and protect vegetative communities identified in Conservation Element policies 6.1 through 6.7. Future Land Use Element 164 Appendix 4A Policy 7.11: The county, in cooperation with the local Health Depai4 wnQQH- Indian River, shall continue to regulate the siting of septi-tamseptic s sus including siting requirements to mitigate soil characteristics. OBJECTIVE 8: PROTECTION OF HISTORIC RESOURCES Through 2015, at least 95% of unincorporated Indian River County's historic properties (as identified in "Historic Properties Survey of Indian River County, Florida", prepared by Historic Property Associates, Inc., April 1989) will continue to be preserved in fair, good, or excellent condition. Policy 8.1: The county historian and, as needed, outside consultants and experts shall provide guidance and advice to the Board of County Commissioners on matters concerning historic and archaeological preservation. The county historian shall be consulted for recommendations concerning: proposed changes to county regulations protecting historic and archaeological resources; and projects which may impact historical and archaeological sites identified on the Florida Master Site File or designated as significant by the Board of County Commissioners. Policy 8.2: Indian River County shall use incentives such as transfer of development rights, tax relief, mitigation, and public acquisitions; and penalties such as fines and imprisonment, to protect and preserve historically and archaeologically important resources. The following criteria are used to determine the historical significance of a resource: • whether or not the resource is at least 50 years old; • whether or not the resource contains significant character, interest or value as part of the historical, cultural, aesthetic and architectural heritage of the county; • whether or not the resource displays historical, political, cultural, economic, or social trends of community history; • whether or not the resource displays unique and/or distinguishing characteristics of an architectural style, design period, construction method, detail, craftsmanship, or material; and • whether or not the resource is a work by a prominent architect, designer, engineer, builder or landscape architect. Policy 8.3: All public and private development or redevelopment proposals shall be reviewed for their impact upon designated historic resources. Policy 8.4: Public and private development and redevelopment activities shall cease, at least temporarily, if historic or archaeological artifacts are discovered, in order to allow for evaluation of historic significance. Future Land Use Element 165 Appendi:W2 A PROPOSED REVISIONS TO COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT Comprehensive Plan Coastal Management Element These counterclockwise -rotating, extreme low pressure storms can reach ten miles in height, can spread over several hundred miles in diameter, and can generate winds in excess of 74 miles per hour (MPH); the minimum wind speed necessary to be classified as a hurricane. The official hurricane season extends from June 1 st to November 30th, with 62 percent of all Florida hurricanes occurring during September and October. While extensive rainfall commonly occurs during a hurricane and may cause widespread inland flooding, the greatest danger associated with a hurricane is storm surge. Storm surge can be described as the rise in wave and tidal heights associated with a hurricane. The vulnerability of an area to storm surge is dependent upon the potential height that a storm surge can achieve along a particular coast and the distance to which the surge can penetrate inland upon making landfall. Thus, low-lying coastal topography, such as inlets, beaches and estuaries, are especially susceptible to the destructive forces of a storm surge (Hurricane Manual for Marine Interests in Indian River County). • Coastal High Hazard Area The Coastal High Hazard Area (CHHA) is defined as the area below the storm surge line of a Category 1 hurricane as established by a Sea, Lake, and Overland Surges from Hurricanes (SLOSH) computer model. The CHHA is depicted in figure 9.11. As of 2018, Indian River County has also designated the CHHA as an "Adaptation Action Area" (AAA) in accordance with Section 163.3164(1) F.S and in support of Objective 15 of this Element and its associated policies. An AAA is defined as one or more areas that experience coastal flooding due to extreme high tides and storm surge. and that are vulnerable to the related impacts of rising sea levels for the purpose of prioritizingfg for infrastructure needs and adaptation planning, Within the CHHA, most of the land is designated for residential use, with permitted densities ranging from 3 to 10 units per acre. A substantial portion of this land is currently developed. Much of that development took place at a time when the CHHA was more narrowly defined as land on the barrier island, east of the Coastal Construction Control Line (CCCL). • Hurricane Vulnerability Zone Although many areas are subject to coastal flooding associated with the severe weather of hurricanes, other areas face imminent danger from the storms. Those areas which face severe erosion, flooding, storm surge, or other direct storm related damages from a Category III hurricane constitute the Hurricane Vulnerability Zone (HVZ). The HVZ is depicted in Figure 9.12. This zone has been identified for special planning and evacuation purposes. • Comprehensive Emergency Management Plan In accordance with Chapter 252, F. S., Indian River County has adopted a Comprehensive Emergency Management Plan (CEMP). The CEMP replaces the Peacetime Emergency Plan (PEP), the Florida Community Development Department Indian River County 17 Appendix B 493 Comprehensive Plan Coastal Management Element Line" (D.S.S.L.). Other than approved dune walkovers, minor structures or erosion control projects, construction is not allowed seaward (east) of this regulatory line. Within Indian River County, the Coastal Barrier Resource Act (CoBRA) recognizes and discourages development in two areas: an area south of Ambersand Beach on the northern portion of the barrier island; and an area in the southern portion of the barrier island near the Indian River - St. Lucie County line. Because these relatively undeveloped areas are recognized as having the greatest potential for storm damage, federal flood insurance is unavailable in these areas. Should a Category V storm event occur, much of the barrier island and particularly the areas identified by CoBRA could be completely destroyed. Even with significant measures in place to reduce potential storm damage, hurricanes Francis and Jeanne in 2004 caused wide -spread damage to structures along the beach as well as structures inland. Sea Level Rise Sea level rise (SLR) is typically defined in terms of either global (eustatic) sea level rise or relative sea level rise. Global sea level rise represents the average change in the height of all of Earth's oceans relative to the land. Conversely, relative sea level rise refers to measured changes in sea level height at specific locations on land relative to localized variations in land elevation, including changes due to ocean rise and/or land subsidence. Global sea level rise is directly influenced by fluctuations in the mass or volume of the ocean. Fluctuations in the volume of the ocean are the result of climatological and geological forces such as thermal expansion and contraction, tectonic shift, lift/subsidence, and sedimentation, while ocean mass is affected by factors including melting or accretion rates of glaciers, snow accumulation, and global water storage and redistribution mechanisms. Based on the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Fifth Assessment Report (AR5), many of these climate related phenomena have been directly influenced by greenhouse -gas emissions increases since the pre -industrial era and other feedback mechanisms. With respect to SLR, the IPCC AR5 indicates that global average land and ocean surface temperatures will likely continue to increase and contribute to the acceleration of SLR encountered in the future. In Florida, baseline relative sea level measurements can be derived from historical tide gauge records of mean monthly sea level. In fact, average monthly sea level measurements have been recorded at tide stations located in Key West, Cedar Key, and Fernandina Beach for more than a century. The yearly averages of these historic data, depicted in Figure 9.14, indicate a gradual trend of rising mean sea level between 1897 and 2017. Moreover, these data highlight regional variability that may be observed among local relative sea level datasets. Based on those data sets, sea levels at Key West Cedar Key, and Fernandina Beach rose approximately 12.72", 12.66" and 15.63"over the last 100 years. Community Development Department Indian River County494 Appendix B Comprehensive Plan Coastal Management Element Annual mean sea level recorded at Key West, Cedar Key, and Fernandina Beach between 1897 and 2017 4.00 3.50 m 3.00 � 2.50 tA 2.00 1.50 �a 1.00 0.50 0.00 ms°}A 001 O,'i Key West Cedar Key Femandina Beach Figure 9.14: Annual mean sea level recorded at Key West, Cedar Key, and Fernandina Beach between 1897 and 2017. Data obtained from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration National Ocean Service. Regional mapping and vulnerability assessment studies related to sea -level rise (SLR) were initially developed by federal, state, and local government agencies in the early 2000s. Circa 2009, development of consistent regional climate change adaptation strategies became the basis for formation of the Southeast Florida Regional Climate Chane Compact (SFRCCC), which was represented by four coastal counties, Monroe, Miami -Dade, Broward, and Palm -Beach. The SFRCCC created a Unified Sea Level Rise Projection for Southeast Florida in 2011 based on U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Engineering Circulars guidance documents, historical tidal data from Key West (1913-1999), and available scientic literature on the subject at the time. This Unified SLR Projection was later revised in 2015 based on updated guidance documents from USACE, NOAH, and the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) (Figure 9.15). According to the revised projection the region may experience between 14 and 34 inches of sea level rise (above 1992 mean sea level) b,. 2060. Community Development Department Indian River CountAM Appendix B Comprehensive Plan Coastal Management Element Unified Sea Level Rise Projection 80 (Southeast Florida ReeionalClimate Chance Co 70 J LL 3 60 Year iu f0 Y � so c E 2030 a 0 40 2060 d d 30 — --- a �, f N a —�c 20 r v 10 r 1992 2000 (PCC, AR5 USACE High NOAA High Median (inches) (inches) (inches) 6 10 12 14 26 34 31 61 81 { I - — — -" -- _- - "26" i I 14"� ♦ r C - MAC! Wwww^vmf KOM Wumadkm law 2010 1020 2030 2040 2050 2060 2070 200 2090 2100 Year Figure 9.15: SFRCCC Unified Sea Level Rise Proiection (2015). Source: Southeast Florida Regional Climate Change Compact Sea Level Rise Work Group (Compact). October 2015. Unified Sea Level Rise Proiection for Southeast Florida. A document prepared for the Southeast Florida Regional Climate Change Compact Steering Committee. 35 p. Concurrently, the National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Coastal Services Center began development of the web -based SLR and Coastal Flooding Impacts Viewer to aid visualization and adaptation planning; efforts for various SLR scenarios. Pilot studies initially_ focused on specific geographic areas along the coasts of Delaware, Mississippi, and Alabama: however, the viewer (now called the Sea Level Rise Viewer) has been regularly updated to include a broad range of coastal areas, including nearly all of Indian River County east of Interstate 95 (I-95). For informational purposes, Indian River County was included in a similar SLR vulnerabili assessment in 2012 that was coordinated by the Seven50 initiative and the Southeast Florida Regional Partnership, which incorporated methodologies developed by the SFRCCC. The assessment, whose results were presented in the 2013 report "Analysis of the Vulnerabili to Sea Level Rise of the Northern SE FL Counties in the Seven50 Planning Region" (Appendix A) evaluated three SLR inundation scenarios (e.g. 1, 2, and 3 feet of inundation) and characterized local geographic areas at potential flood risk due to potential SLR. Baseline land elevation measurements, upon which the one foot, two foot, and three foot inundation levels were mapped were derived from Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR) vertical elevation data that were obtained from the NOAA Coastal Services Center. These data were originally collected in 2007 for the Florida Department of Emergency Management (FDEM). SLR inundation maps depicted flood risks based on two levels of confidence. 80-100% certainty and 20-79.9% certainty, and were categorized as either "more likely" to be inundated or "possibly" inundated, respectively. The local maps presented in the 2013 Seven50 report, provided a clear visual comparison of the magnitude of flood -related impacts that may be encountered in Indian River County under 1, 2, and 3 -ft SLR inundation scenarios. Community Development Department Indian River Countoft Appendix B Comprehensive Plan Coastal Management Element Moreover, other data comparisons were evaluated in the analysis including taxable property value ranges impacted based on inundation level, degree of impacts to higher and lower functional classification roads, and total acres impacted based on future land use designation. Those baseline data provided critical insights for implementation of long range adaptation planningstrategies. trategies. ANALYSIS Land Use This analysis section addresses issues, problems, and opportunities within the coastal zone. A complete analysis of land use data, including a comparison of land use acreages by classification, is contained in the Future Land Use Element of the Comprehensive Plan. In the past, comprehensive plan policies, including the Future Land Use Map, have successfully directed new residential and nonresidential development to designated areas of the county. Consequently, there have been few amendments to the land use map and only minor adjustments to the county's Urban Service Area boundary since the county's current comprehensive plan was adopted in 1990. In fact, the only significant changes to the Future Land Use Map in the previous decade have been amendments designating publicly acquired environmental lands for conservation. Going forward, the major land use issues facing Indian River County in the coastal zone and in the county overall are urban sprawl, rural sprawl, agricultural preservation, and conservation of natural systems within the context of development. Economy Generally, the county's economy is limited in diversity and largely reliant on service oriented industries. Despite this current lack of economic diversity, Indian River County has attractive qualities that certain businesses look for. These qualities, which include an available development - ready supply of land and an exceptional quality of life (warm weather, beaches, minimal population density, resource-based recreational opportunities, etc.), will aid the county as it seeks to increase its economic base in the future. - Eco Tourism A significant aspect of the County's quality of life is its natural resources, not the least of which is the Indian River Lagoon. Resources such as the lagoon provide significant economic benefits to the county. According to the Indian River Lagoon Economic Assessment and Analysis Update (2007), the total economic impact in 2007 of visitors to the Indian River Lagoon in Indian River County was over $110 million. Because of its natural assets, as well as cultural heritage, Indian River County has an opportunity to capitalize on ecotourism. From an economic development standpoint, the County, through its County Environmental Lands Program, is actively preserving some of its greatest natural assets and Community Development Department Indian River County4%7 Appendix B Comprehensive Plan Coastal Manazement Element Indian River Lagoon, the St. Sebastian River, or other surface water bodies, the County's policy should be to promote the connection of waterfront subdivisions to the sanitary sewer system. A complete analysis of sanitary sewer is provided in the Sanitary Sewer Sub -Element. - Stormwater Management Since 1990, stormwater management facilities in the county have been designed to handle a 25 year/24 hour storm event, as well as to provide treatment before discharging stormwater runoff. Because many sections of the county were developed prior to 1990, the level of service for stormwater management facilities continues to vary throughout the county. Over the past several years, the county has made progress in reducing flood hazards by constructing stormwater management projects in certain areas of the county with known flooding problems, including Vero Lake Estates, east Gifford and the Rockridge Subdivision. Moreover, projects such as the Sebastian Stormwater Park and the North Relief Canal Pollution Control Facility, described previously in this report, contribute to improved stormwater quality. Despite implementation of these projects, the county needs to continue to identify, seek funding, and construct new stormwater improvement projects in areas where needed. A more complete analysis of the County's stormwater management facilities is contained in the Stormwater Management Sub -Element. Sea Level Rise Since the completion of the SLR vulnerability assessment in 2012 that was described in the Existing Conditions section, Senate Bill 1094 was enacted, modifying_ Florida Statute section 163.3178(2)(f) to require, among other provisions, that local governments in Florida "include development and redevelopment principles, strategies, and engineering solutions that reduce the flood risk in coastal areas which results from high -tide events, storm surge, flash floods, stormwater runoff, and the related impacts of sea -level rise" within the coastal management elements of their comprehensive plans. In accordance with this legislation, and based on the best available data from the NOAA Coastal Service Center sea level projection models and best available local projected inundation data, County SLR inundation maps have been incorporated into this Coastal Management Element for planning purposes (Figures 9.16, 9.17, and 9.18). Community Development Department Indian River County4" Appendix B Comprehensive Plan Coastal Manaeement Element BREVARD COUNT A IL J J X ORCHID 85TH ST L - 570 � • - - !'� �a,� � 3� Indian River County Sea Level Rise Inundation, 1 ft - More Likely Possible Source of SLR Inundation Data: NOAA Coastal Services Center. Charleston, SC, 2012. .y .S +, 69TH ST INDIAN RIVER SHORES 53RD ST o �41STST \ �, F- .0 VERO BEACH 20TH ST, 110 `4TH ST, .0_ .9TH ST SW o at t 0 1 z 3 a Miles ^� I i S ! IRC Environmental Planning 12/18/20\17\ S T7 LUCIE COUNTY 1 � Figure 9.16: 1 -Foot Sea Level Rise Scenario in Indian River County, FL Community Development Department Indian River County4" Appendix 6 Comprehensive Plan Coastal Management Element BREVARD COUNT Indian River County Sea Level Rise Inundation, 2 ft - More Likely Possible Source of SLR Inundation Data: NOAA Coastal Services Center, Charleston, SC, 2012. f s J SEBASTIAN ,�, j~ ORCHID t r a i i 85TH ST ,y ---69TH ST = — t t•� 1 INDIAN RIVER SHORES 53RD ST 4 1` „bra 41 ST ST _ VERO BEACH 1/ - L .�� J 20TH ST. `4TH ST, 9TH ST SW a t 0 1 2 3 Miles I IRC Environmental Planning 12/18,'2017 ST. L U C I E'C O U N T Y 1 1 � Figure 9.17: 2 -Foot Sea Level Rise Scenario in Indian River County, FL Community Development Department Indian River County5#O Appendix B Comprehensive Plan Coastal Manaeement Element BREVARD COUNT I } �SEBASnAN �h, ORCHID —JLAI esTH sT i' ' 11 6 69TH -ST S ?` • a -- 53RD ST e r r � 41 ST ST �•� i' co VERO BEACH C� 20TH ST i : ATH sr,,� • a' 9TH ST S W Miles t IRC Environmental Planning 12/18/2017 Figure 9.18: 3 -Foot Se Indian River County Sea Level Rise Inundation, 3 ft - More Likely Possible Source of SLR Inundation Data: NOAA Coastal Services Center, Charleston, SC, 2012. INDIAN RIVER SHORES 1 � e ST LUCIE~COLINTY r� 8 l � Rise Scenario in Indian River County, FL Community Development Department Indian River CountyJ04 Appendix 6 Comprehensive Plan Coastal Management Element Table 9.4: Revised Sea Level Rise Inundation Estimates for Indian River County, Florida* Probability 1ft Inundation 2ft Inundation 3ft Inundation Category (in Sq. Area (in Sg. Area (in Sq. Miles) Miles) Miles) Miles Possible 5.95 6.95 6.05 More Likely 0.90 2.84 6.54 Probability Cate2ory Acres Acres Acres Possible 3,809.97 4,447.07 3,871.39 More Likely 575.53 1,814.65 4,187.81 *Source: NOAA Coastal Services Center, Charleston, S.C., 2012, and Indian River County Environmental Planning, 2017. Note: The geographic areas within the probability categories "Possible" and "More Likely" do not overlap. Inundation Risk by Land Use The total land use area at risk from each SLR inundation scenario was analyzed. When evaluated based on total acres inundated. the data indicate that under all three inundation scenarios theeQr atest impacts of SLR are on lands designated Conservation and Recreation. Notably, privately owned estuarine wetlands and undeveloped lagoon island conservation areas appear to be the most vulnerable to SLR inundation impacts. It is estimated that more than 85% of currently existing coastal wetlands are at risk of inundation under the 3 foot sea level rise scenario. Physical infrastructure such as roadways,power plants, ports and airports, landfills, hospitals and schools were determined to be critical facilities that were initially evaluated in the 2013 Seven50 report. Based on the best available data from the NOAA Coastal Service Center sea level projection models, risks to physical infrastructure at the one, two and three foot scenarios are described below. • Indian River County has 4 airports east of I-95. No impacts were reported. • FPL has seven parcels under the category of Electrical Power Substation. The City Vero Beach has nine. No impacts were reported. • FEC Railroad rights of way were assessed but did not show a vulnerabili , to sea level rise (no miles of track impacted). • The water and wastewater treatment plant analysis included the Indian River Wastewater and Water Treatment facilities. Significant impacts may be encountered at facilities located along the Indian River Lagoon which incorporate coastal mosquito impoundments and estuarine marshes. • Indian River County has 2 parcels under the data category of landfills. No impacts were reported. Community Development Department Indian River Count54fi Appendix Comprehensive Plan Coastal Management Element • Hospital facilities are mainly concentrated in Vero Beach. Under the 2 and 3 foot scenarios approximately 6.8 and 16.5 acres of inundation, respectively, could be possible on the Indian River Medical Center parcel'. Impacts were to undeveloped portions of the parcel and no building infrastructure would be affected. • The Indian River County Schools include five charter schools, eight public schools, 11 private schools and Indian River Community College. Fourteen total schools are designated as storm shelters. None of these were impacted at any scenario. • Evacuation Routes to and from the barrier islands were not shown to be vulnerable to sea level rise at the three scenarios tested. 'Note: the currently undeveloped and unelevated east end of the overall IRMC parcel could be impacted under the scenarios tested. Mitigation and adaptation strategies Based on the analysis provided in this element, the majority of the inundation impacts are projected to occur within the Coastal High Hazard Area (CHHA); consequently, mitigation strategies that will likely have the greatest effect on reducing exposure to inundation risk due to one foot, two foot and three foot SLR scenarios involve reducing the potential population and vulnerable development within the CHHA. Therefore, the CHHA area should be used as an "Adaptation Action Area" (AAA) to implement strategies that address sea level rise impacts. Strategies that accomplish these objectives include reducing_ public infrastructure expenditures in at risk areas identified on the inundation maps, preventing or capping the number of assisted living facilities and similar special needs populations and higher density developments within the CHHA/AAA, and acquiring conservation and open space lands in the CHHA/AAA when feasible. Future adaptation strategies may include relocation and/or elevation of critical infrastructure facilities and roadways where appropriate, incorporation of living shorelines that provide coastal resilience and carbon sequestration benefits, and improvements to stormwater conve a�nce systems that maybe susceptible to failure as a result of rising groundwater and tide levels. Additionally, saltwater intrusion will be a growing concern based on the cumulative effects of projected potential SLR inundation and rising groundwater levels. Community Development Department Indian River CountY5W Appendix B Comprehensive Plan Coastal Management Element Policy 13.2: The county, in cooperation with the FWC, USFWS, FIND, and the ELC, will distribute manatee awareness and boating safety materials to local boaters at the time of yearly boat registration and other appropriate locations such as marinas, bait and tackle shops, and public parks. Polio: By 2010, the county shall initiate a monofilament line recycling program by placing marked collection receptacles at boat ramps, marinas, bridges, and strategic locations. Polio: All existing and new boat facilities (public and private) shall be required to post manatee awareness signs. Policy 13.5: By 2010, all rental vessels, including personal watercraft, in Indian River County shall be required to display stickers or plasticized cards with boating safety and manatee protection information. OBJECTIVE 14 Manatee Protection Measures Through 2015, the annual number of manatee mortalities in Indian River County shall be no more than five (5), excluding unusual events such as red tide or disease outbreaks. Of these annual mortalities, no more than one (1) mortality shall be watercraft -related. Policy 14.1: The county, in cooperation with the City of Vero Beach Utilities Department and the FWC Bureau of Protected Species Management will ensure that disruptions to outflow, and/or inadequate temperatures to sustain manatees during winter are minimized, and that all necessary precautions to minimize hazards at the power plant are initiated. Polio: The county shall continue to assist the Indian River Mosquito Control District to identify and retrofit any remaining culverts or pipes that pose a threat of manatee entrapment. OBJECTIVE 15 Sea Level Rise Adaptation Strategies Through 2060, the County shall adopt, implement, and pursue strategies that increase community resiliency and protect property, infrastructure, and cultural and natural resources from the impacts of sea level rise. Policy 15.1: By 2022, Public properties and infrastructure, including but not limited to water and wastewater facilities, stormwater systems, roads, bridges, governmental buildings, hospitals, coastal wetlands, transit infrastructure and other public assets that may be at risk to sea level rise impacts shall be identified. Based on risk inventory findings, resiliency improvements and relocation of infrastructure shall be considered as part of capital improvement plans, where warranted. Policy 15.2: During major evaluations and overall updates to the comprehensive plan, the best available data and sea level rise projections such as those made by the United States Army Corps of Engineers, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Association, and the Southeast Florida Community Development Department Indian River County504 Appendix 6 Comprehensive Plan Coastal Management Element Regional Climate Change Compact, shall be taken into consideration when evaluating or updating policies related to sea level rise. Policy 15.3: Beginning in 2022, and every 5 years thereafter, the County shall review the best available data on local sea level rise projections and County sea level rise inundation maps and shall update inundation maps and related analysis, as warranted. Policy 15.4: The County shall coordinate with local municipalities regarding sea level rise adaptation and mitigation measures. Policy 15.5: The County hereby adopts the Coastal High Hazard Area (CHHA) as an "Adaptation Action Area" (AAA) as defined in this Coastal Management Element to identify the geographic areas most vulnerable to the impacts of projected potential sea level rise and most appropriate for mitigation measures and resiliency improvements. Furthermore, the County shall apply this Element's Objective 5 CHHA policies to limit public infrastructure expenditures within the AAA. Policy 15.6: By 2023, the County shall re-evaluate flood zone requirements and mitigation strategies within the AAA. Policy 15.7: The County shall prohibit location within the AAA of new adult congregate living facilities, nursing homes, and other similar facilities that serve special needs populations. Policy 15.8: No increase in land use designation density shall be approved by the County for properties that lie within the AAA. PLAN IMPLEMENTATION An important part of any plan is its implementation. Implementation involves execution of the plan's policies by taking actions and achieving results. For the Coastal Management Element, implementation involves various activities. While some of these actions will be ongoing, others are activities that will be taken by certain points in time. For each policy in this element, Table 9.4 identifies the type of action required, the entity or entities responsible for taking the action, the timing, and whether or not the policy necessitates a capital expenditure. To implement the Coastal Management Element, several types of action must be taken. These include, but are not limited to: coordination with jurisdictional and reviewing agencies, establishing marina facilities siting criteria, and protecting/preserving estuarine resources. Overall plan implementation responsibility will rest with the Community Development Department. Besides its responsibilities as identified in Table 9.4, the Community Development Department has the additional responsibility of ensuring that other entities discharge their responsibilities. This will entail notifying other applicable departments of capital expenditures to be included in their budgets, Community Development Department Indian River Countty505 Appendix 6 PROPOSED REVISION TO FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT POLICY 17.5 OBJECTIVE 17: COASTAL POPULATION Through 2030, the county will have no increase in land use designation density or intensity within the Coastal High Hazard Area. Policy 17.1: The county shall not approve plan amendments that increase the residential density or land use intensity within the Coastal High Hazard Area. Policy 17.2: The county shall support programs of land acquisition on the barrier island for natural resource preservation, recreation or both. Policy 17.3: The county shall limit densities in the coastal high hazard area to ensure timely evacuation of the barrier island. Policy 17.4: The county shall prohibit new development of adult congregate living facilities, nursing homes, homes for the aged, total care facilities, and similar developments within the Coastal High Hazard Area. Policy 17_5: The county hereby adopts the Coastal High Hazard Area boundary depicted on the county's Future Land Use Map. As set forth in Coastal Management Element Policy 15.5, the Coastal High Hazard Area is designated as an Adaptation Action Area (AAA) as defined in the Coastal Management Element, subject to the policies of this Objective 17 and of Coastal Mana eg rn Element Objective 15 which include density and land use restrictions. Appendix B C:\Users\roland\Desktop\FLUE Policy 17.5 sea level rise revision - Attach 5.docx 506 Q. F INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA MEMORANDUM TO: Jason E. Brown, County Administrator THROUGH: Richard B. Szpyrka P.E., Public Works Dire#Op/ ctor FROM: Keith McCully, P.E., Stormwater Engineer SUBJECT: Final Update on the Pilot Plant Study for a Full -Scale Managed Aquatic Plant Pollutant Removal System Treating Water from the North Relief Canal DATE: March 7, 2018 DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS On August 16, 2016, the Board of County Commissioners entered into a contract with Van Ert, Nemoto and Associates, LLC ("VEN"), to. perform a pilot plant study to investigate a managed aquatic plant pollutant removal system along the Indian River Farms Water Control District's (IRFWCD) North Relief Canal. The study is complete and the purpose of this Agenda Item is to summarize results. A brief PowerPoint presentation is part of the Agenda Item. The pilot plant study consists of four distinct stages: • Stage 1 — Site Selection, Preliminary Water Testing, and Pilot Plant Construction • Stage 2 — Pilot Testing: Comparative Testing and Downselect • Stage 3 — Pilot Testing: Optimal Plants and Parameters • Stage 4 — Preliminary Full -Scale Design Report Final results indicate that the most efficient pollutant reduction system should consist of a water lettuce module followed by a non -sloped algal reaeration module followed by a passive wetland polishing system. The majority of the pollutant removal will occur in the water lettuce and algal modules, which will be regularly harvested to remove nutrients contained in their excess biomass. Design removal rates are: • Water Lettuce Module o Design Aerial Nitrogen Removal Rate = 131.09 grams/meter2-year o Design Aerial Phosphorus Removal Rate = 21.20 grams/meter2-year • Algal Reaeration Module o Design Aerial Nitrogen Removal Rate = 60.69 grams/mete12-year o Design Aerial Phosphorus Removal Rate = 12.93 grams/meter2-year • Wetland Polishing System o Design Aerial Nitrogen Removal Rate = 46.59 grams/meter2-year o Design Aerial Phosphorus Removal Rate = 6.87 grams/meter2-year 507 c:\users\legistar\appdata\local\temp\bcl technologies\easypdf 8\@bcl@b80da34e\@bcl@b80da34e.doc Page 2 North Relief Canal Managed Aquatic Plant Pilot Plant Final Update BCC Meeting — March 20, 2018 Estimated removals for the full-scale system are: • Total Nitrogen Removal = 8,900 pounds/year • Total Phosphorus Removal = 1,500 pounds/year Note that due to the design, the system can tolerate pumping interruptions and is amenable to twelve hour, daytime pumping schedules, when removal rates are anticipated to be optimal, or other pumping schedules. This feature may reduce the electric power costs and operational challenges associated with other facilities, such as algal turf .scrubbers, that must pump continuously to maintain system performance and crop integrity. FUNDING Funding for the pilot plant study comes from Transportation Fund/Stormwater/Aquatic Plant Pilot Study — Account # 11128138-033190-16031. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the County Commission authorize Stormwater Division staff to proceed with final design of a full-scale North Relief Canal pollutant removal system, utilizing the treatment processes recommended by the Pilot Plant Study, and as presented in the attached PowerPoint preliminary engineering design; said facility being located on the County's 18.03 acre property at the southeast intersection of the Lateral A Canal and the North Relief Canal. ATTACHMENTS Copy of PowerPoint presentation DISTRIBUTION Public Works Stormwater Division APPROVED AGENDA ITEM FOR MARCH 20, 2018 508 C:\Users\legistar\AppData\Local\Temp\BCL Technologies\easyPDF 8\@BCL@B80DA34E\@BCL@B80DA34E.doc North Relief Canal Pilot Plant Project: Final Update Summary C '�" � t. YrFf � � n _ .J 'k1 y� r '�zI � tc`rr,• �f if �� t Prepared by: Keith McCully, P.E. Matthew Van Ert, Ph.D. March 6, 2018 509 Project Basics Four Stages: Stage 1: Site Selection, Preliminary Water Testing, and Pilot Plant Construction Stage 2: Comparative Testing Systems C Stand-alone Attached Algae System C Low Energy Aquatic Plant System (LEAPSTM): Water Lettuce, Algae Floway, and Emergent Aquatic Plants Stage 3: Pilot Testing: Optimal Plants and Parameters Stage 4: Preliminary Full Scale Design Report Stage 1: Basic Water Quality Findings o Majority of Nitrogen is organic form = 78.1% (difficult for plants to utilize) o Majority of Phosphorous is in Ortho -Phosphorus state = 70.9% (readily available to plants); nitrogen limiting conditions o Nitrogen and Phosphorous levels seasonally variable Average influent concentrations during pilot operational period was 0.77 mg/L nitrogen and 0.13 mg/L phosphorous; similar to Egret Marsh Facility (N=0.95 mg/L and P= 0.101 mg/L) o Suspended solids are low, rarely above detection limits (< 15 mg/L when detected) 511 Stage 2 and Stage 3:High Level Findings o LEAPS"' system exhibited superior removal performance relative to the stand-alone algae system by both harvest and water quality methods (1/23/2017 to 3/28/2017) o .Continued and focused testing of LEAPSTM system indicated e Highest Nitrogen and Phosphorous areal removal rates in water lettuce tanks, followed by algae module; removal rates exhibited positive correlation with influent concentrations G Nitrogen and Phosphorous areal removal rates exceed those exhibited by the Egret Marsh ATSTM facility O Areal removal rates calculated by water quality and harvest -based methods were nearly identical for Nitrogen, Phosphorous ARRs higher via water quality method - more conservative harvest calculations used for design e Water lettuce crop survived long-term pumping interruptions associated with hurricane IRMA 512 Stage 3 Final Results: LEAPS TM Module Aerial Removal Rates (ARRs), Harvest -based 513 �' 'r •♦IL L; Wetland Pollutant Water Lettuce Tanks Algal Regeneration Unit Plants Nitrogen ARR 131.09 60.69 46.59 (g/m2/Yr) Phosphorus ARR 21.20 12.93 6.87 (g/m2/Yr) 513 e . :It �:Ja 4i 7 ,,a 1i I A t 137 a Uil OF .� LL Cam OZ Z1 ir 'r tz ti ri e . :It �:Ja 4i 7 ,,a 1i I 11 A, ;x ir (L a OF .� LL Cam OZ Z1 11 A, ;x ir (L 515 Dylan Reingold, County Attorney William K. DeBraal, Deputy Couny, Attorney Kate Pingolt Cotner, Assistant County Attorney 12).A. County Attorney's Matters - B. C. C. 3.20.18 Office of INDIAN RIVER COUNTY MEMORANDUM TO: Board of County Commissioners FROM: Dylan Reingold, County Attorney DATE: March 13, 2018 SUBJECT: Resolution Supporting Rail Safety Study BACKGROUND. ATTORNEY As the Indian River County Board of County Commissioners is well aware, the new All Aboard Florida/Brightline train has experienced several incidents of accidents involving vehicles, pedestrians and bicycle riders. Some of these incidents have resulted in fatalities. Indian River County has been demanding that the State of Florida take a more active role in addressing safety issues associated with higher speed passenger rail. To that end, line item 2673 of House Bill 5001 (Conference Report on 5001), directs the Office of Program Policy Analysis and Government Accountability (OPPAGA) to commission a study that includes the following: ➢ An overview of the Florida Rail System, including existing and planned passenger rail and high- speed passenger rail operations in Florida, and identification of existing and planned passenger rail and high-speed passenger rail stations, corridors, and associated railroad -highway crossings. 9 An overview of the jurisdiction of federal, state, and local governments to regulate passenger rail and high-speed passenger rail operations. ➢ A review of data relating to incidents, including resulting injuries and fatalities, involving passenger rail and high-speed passenger rail operations in Florida. ➢ Recommendations to further enhance passenger rail and high-speed passenger rail safety in this state, including a review of current crossing signalization, grade crossings and separations, corridor protection, public education and awareness, and coordination with local law enforcement and emergency management officials. ➢ Recommendations to further improve passenger rail and high-speed passenger rail in Florida. F:L41mmy.b&.1GENEWOCCI &M.Afrm RcilSoferySmdyRe 1.flo dx 516 Board of County Commissioners March 20, 2018 Page Two In the attached resolution, the Indian River County Board of County Commissioners respectfully requests Governor Rick Scott to support and not veto line item 2673 of House Bill 5001, which is important not just for All Aboard FloridaBrightline, but for any future planned higher speed passenger rail system. A certified copy of the resolution will be sent to Governor Rick Scott, Florida State Senators Debbie Mayfield and Joe Negron, and Florida State Representatives Erin Grall, and MaryLynn Magar, United States Senators Marco Rubio and Bill Nelson, United States Congressmen Bill Posey and Brian Mast and Florida Department of Transportation Secretary Mike Dew. FUNDING. There is no funding associated with this agenda item. RECOMMENDATION. The County Attorney's Office recommends that the Chair allow for public comment on this matter and then have the Board vote whether to accept the resolution as drafted or amend the resolution. ATTACHMENT(S). Proposed resolution. RIA�iomMLindnlGG\'F1t4L18 C CVlgenda AfemasVinll SofeyS1.gvR-1.1i-d. 517 RESOLUTION NO. 2018- A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, IN SUPPORT OF LINE ITEM 2673 OF 11115001 THAT DIRECTS OPPAGA TO COMMISSION A STUDY ON PASSENGER SAFETY AND HIGH SPEED PASSENGER RAIL SAFETY IN THE STATE OF FLORIDA. WHEREAS, the State of Florida currently has four passenger rail systems operating within its jurisdiction: Tri -Rail, SUNRail, All Aboard Florida/Brightline and Amtrak, and WHEREAS, in 2017 alone, there were approximately 43 deaths and 198 non-fatal injuries relating to the identified passenger rail systems in the State of Florida; WHEREAS, although high-speed passenger rail is not a new concept and has been contemplated since at least 1996, All Aboard Florida/Brightline is anticipated to be the first company to operate such a system in the State of Florida between West Palm Beach and Orlando at speeds of up to 125 mph, and WHEREAS, Brightline intends to operate 32 passenger trains at an average speed of 106 mph on the Florida East Coast Railway corridor through populated areas of Indian River County, including Vero Beach, Sebastian, and the communities of Gifford, Roseland, Wabasso and Winter Beach; and WHEREAS, Indian River County has significant safety concerns about Brightline traversing at such high speeds along an open railroad corridor and across 31 highway -railroad grade crossings, and WHEREAS, line item 2673 of HB 5001 (Conference Report on 5001), directs the Office of Program Policy Analysis and Government Accountability (OPPAGA). to commission a study that includes the following: ➢ An overview of the Florida Rail System, including existing and planned passenger rail and high-speed passenger rail operations in the state, and identification of existing and planned passenger rail and high-speed passenger rail stations, corridors, and associated railroad -highway crossings; ➢ An overview of the jurisdiction of federal, state, and local governments to regulate passenger rail and high-speed passenger rail operations; ➢ A review of data relating to incidents, including resulting injuries and fatalities, involving passenger rail and high-speed passenger rail operations in Florida; 1 518 ➢ Recommendations to further enhance passenger rail and high-speed passenger rail safety in Florida, including a review of current crossing signalization, grade crossings and separations, corridor protection, public education and awareness, and coordination with local law enforcement and emergency management officials; and ➢ Recommendations to further improve passenger rail and high-speed passenger rail in Florida. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, THAT: Section 1. The above "WHEREAS" clauses are true and correct, and are hereby adopted as findings of the Board. Section 2. The Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County respectfully requests Governor Rick Scott support and not veto line item 2673 of HB 5001. Section 3. A certified copy of this resolution shall be provided to the Governor Rick Scott, Florida State Senators Debbie Mayfield and Joe Negron, and Florida State Representatives Erin Grall, and MaryLynn Magar, United States Senators Marco Rubio and Bill Nelson, United States Congressmen Bill Posey and Brian Mast and Florida Department of Transportation Secretary Mike Dew. The foregoing resolution was moved for adoption by Commissioner , and seconded by Commissioner , and, upon being put to a vote, the vote was as follows: Chairman Peter D. O'Bryan Vice Chairman Bob Solari Commissioner Susan Adams Commissioner Joseph E. Flescher Commissioner Tim Zorc The Chairman thereupon declared the resolution duly passed and adopted this day of March, 2018. ATTEST: Jeffrey R. Smith, Clerk of Court BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF and Comptroller INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA Un M Deputy Clerk Peter D. O'Bryan, Chairman Approved as to form and le alb icie .y: By: Dylan Reingold, County Attorney 2 519 15. ) L, \' eol DISTRICT INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA MEMORANDUM TO: Honorable Emergency Services District Board of Commissioners THROUGH: Jason E. Brown, County Administrator THROUGH: John King, Director Department of Emergency Services FROM: Tad Stone, Assistant Chief Fire Rescue DATE: February 23, 2018 SUBJECT: Renewal of Letter of Agreement for Critical Incident -Stress Management Consultation (CISM) Services It is respectfully requested that the information contained herein be given formal consideration by the Emergency Services District Board of Commissioners at the next scheduled meeting. DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS: On April 4, 2017 the Board approved an agreement between Indian River County Fire Rescue and the Mental Health Association to provide services to our emergency responders, on an as needed basis, as it fulfills a need within the Critical Incident -Stress Management (CISM) program. The agreement outlines services to be provided as well as associated fees for services. These services will be billed at $100.00 per hour. Under the current agreement, Indian River County Fire Rescue has expended $200.00 to date, for CISM services. The current agreement is nearing its expiration date of April 4, 2018 and staff is requesting a renewal of the agreement for the period of one (1) year from the date of execution. FUNDING: Funding for the CISM consultation services will come from the Emergency Services District Funds -Other Professional Services account in the approved FY 2017/2018 Budget. ITEM Account Number Other Professional Services 11412022-033190 RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Board approve the one (1) year extension to the CISM Consultation Services Agreement and authorization for the Chairman to sign the agreement. 520 DISTRICT ATTACHMENTS: Letter of Agreement for Critical Incident -Stress Management Consultation (CISM) Services for execution 521 Indian River County Board of County Commissioners Department of Emergency Services 4225 43"' Avenue, Vero Beach, Florida 32967 March 2, 2018 .Robert J. Brugnoli, Ph.D. Executive Director Mental Health Association in Indian River County 820 37`x' .Place Vero Beach, Florida 32960 Re: Letter of Agreement for Critical Incident -Stress Management Consultation (CISM) Services Dear Dr. Brugnoli: Thank you for your response to our request for CISM Services for our Emergency Services District (District) first responder personnel. The purpose of this letter is to memorialize the agreement for providing CISM services and payment of CISM fees and costs.. From time to time, our first responders encounter tragic and stressfiil events. It is hoped that by making CISM services available to first responders.. it will enable them to recover from these events in a health), manner. As we discussed, we will request your serviceson an as needed basis. There will be three main instances when the District will call upon you for your assistance. A staff member will call you by telephone to discuss an event in order to advise you of the situation and ask for your recommendation as how best to handle the event. The staff member will ask you to come into the station immediately (if possible) or at the next shift of those responders involved in the event for a counseling session. You will be asked to conduct follow-up CISM sessions with the responders involved in the event. You have agreed to charge the District for your services as follows: Dr. Brugnoli Jeanie Shepher Dave Thomas $100.00/hour $100.001hour $100.00/hour 522 Indian Rivet County . Board of County Commissioners Department of Emergency Services 4225 431d Avenue. Vero Beach, Florida 32967 We would ask that you send us a monthly bill itemizing your time and expenses to the following address: 8rnergency Services District 4225 4310 Avenue Vero Beach, Florida 32,967 This agreement will remain in effect until one (]).year from the date of the last signature of th-is letter. Changes or extensions to this agreement will be made in writing and signed by each 1 party. Either party may terminate this agreement by giving (lie other party 30 days' notice. Please,feel free to call if you have any questions regarding this agreement, If you have no questions and all looks acceptable to you, please execute the enclosed cop), of this letter and return it to my office at your earliest convenience. Yours very truly Theodore "Tad" Stone, Director Department of Emergency Services 523 ►r �5�� O� rr Indian- River County Board of County Commissioners OR&4`, v. Department of tinetgency Services 4225 4P Avemte, Vero Beach, Florida 32967 ACKNOWLEDGED AND AGREED DATED THIS T" DAY OF ��r , 20/8 Robert J.dffdgnoli, .D. Executive. Director Mental Health Association in Indian River County DATED THIS DAY OF , 20 Peter O'Bryan, Chairman Indian River County Emergency Services District APPROVED County Administrator Attest: Jeffrey R. Smith, Clerk of Court and Comptroller 13y: Deputy Clerk 524 Dylan Reingold, County Attorney William K. DeBraal, Deputy County Attorney Kate Pingolt Cotner, Assistant County Attorney 15. A EMERGENCY SERVICES DISTRICT: 3/20/18 Of ce of INDIAN MEMORANDUM TO: Emergency Services District FROM: Dylan Reingold - County Attorney DATE: March 8, 2018 SUBJECT: Fire Station #14 Bill of Sale of Utility Facilities — Water and Sewer RIVER COUNTY ATTORNEY The Utilities Department is now ready to accept the water and sewer improvements in association with the construction of the new Fire Station #14; and the Emergency Services District will need to convey the water and sewer infrastructure to Indian River County, which improvements are located within the existing right-of-way of 26t' Street. Attached is a Bill of Sale of Utility Facilities to accomplish this conveyance. Additionally, the contractor is procuring the necessary surety bond to warranty the improvements due to defective materials or workmanship for one year. FUNDING: The only cost associated with this item will be the recordation cost in the amount of $27.00 for the Bill of Sale of Utility Facilities which is available from Optional Sales Tax/Fire Station 14/Construction Account No. 31512022-066510-15015. RECOMMENDATION: Approve the Bill of Sale of Utility Facilities and authorize the Chairman of the Board to execute same for recordation in the public records of Indian River County, Florida. /nhm Attachment 525 Prepared by: Office of County Attorney Indian River County 180127 1h Street Vero Beach, FL 32960 772-226-1425 BILL OF SALE OF UTILITY FACILITIES to INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA RE: Fire Station 14 (UCP #3278) KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that EMERGENCY SERVICES DISTRICT OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, a dependent special district of Indian River County, Florida, operating by and through its Board of County Commissioners, having a mailing address of 1801 271 Street, Vero Beach, Florida 32960, hereinafter called GRANTOR, in consideration of value received, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, has and does hereby grant, bargain, sell, transfer, and deliver unto INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, whose mailing address is 1801 27th Street, Vero Beach, FL 32960, hereinafter called GRANTEE, this day of March, 2018, the following goods and chattels: EXHIBIT "A" ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE APART HEREOF which utility facilities are located within the existing 26th Street right-of-way. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the same unto GRANTEE forever, and GRANTOR hereby warrants to the GRANTEE that it has free and. unencumbered title to the above-described facilities, that all persons or entities which have supplied labor or materials with respect to these facilities have been paid in full, that none of them has any claim whatsoever with respect thereto, and that the GRANTOR has full authority to make this conveyance and will warrant and defend the sale of said chattels and utility facilities hereby made unto GRANTEE against the lawful claimsand demands of all persons whomsoever. GRANTOR hereby further warrants that should the above described utility facilities fail or otherwise become defective during a period of one year from the date of acceptance of same by GRANTEE (3/20/2018 to 3/20/2019), due to defective materials or workmanship, GRANTOR shall upon each occasion be responsible in all respects for such failure or defect and shall correct same at GRANTOR's sole cost and without expense to GRANTEE upon reasonable notice by GRANTEE. GRANTOR shall be solely liable and shall save GRANTEE harmless from any direct or consequential damage attributable to such failure or defect. GRANTOR hereby also assigns all its right, title, and interest in and to manufacturer's or supplier's warranties with respect to the described facilities. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the GRANTOR has herein set its hand and seal the day and year first above written. EMERGENCY SERVICES DISTRICT OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA LIM ATTEST: Jeffrey R. Smith, Clerk of Circuit Court and Comptroller Deputy Clerk Peter D. O'Bryan, Chairman District approved: APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGAL SUFFICIEJ�LCY 526 DYLAN REINGOLD STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF INDIAN RIVER I HEREBY CERTIFY that on this day before me, an officer duly authorized in the above State and County to take acknowledgments, personally appeared Peter D. O'Bryan, to me known to .be the person described in and who executed the foregoing instrument as the Chairman of the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida, for the Emergency Services District of Indian River County, Florida, a dependent special district of Indian River County, Florida, and acknowledged to and before me that he executed the same as the act and deed of such county. WITNESS my hand and official seal in the above county and state this day of March, 2018. NOTARY PUBLIC printed name: Commission No.: Commission Expiration: 527 2 Fire Station #14 Utility Cost Estimate For Bill of Sale and 1 -Year Maintenance Amount UCP #3278 WATER SYSTEM UNIT QUANTITY UNIT PRICE TOTAL 8" DIP LF 4 $ 45.00 $ 180.00 8" C-900 LF 39 $ 26.00 $ 1,014.00 16" x 8" Tapping Sleeve & Valve EA 1 $ 4,600.00 $ 4,600.00 Fire Hydrant Assembly & GV EA 1 $ 4,250.00 $ 4,250.00 8" Gate Valve EA 2 $ 1,450.00 $ 2,900.00 8" 90 Degree Bend EA 4 $ 375.00 $ 1,500.00 8" x 6" Reducer EA 1 $ 450.00 $ 450.00 6" C-900 EA 19 $ 24,00 $ 456.00 18" x 6" Tee EA 1 $ 450.00 $ 450.00 Sin le 2" Water Service EA 1 $ 1,355.00 $ 1,355.00 Subtotal $ 17,165.00 SANITARY SEWER 4"x4" Tapping Sleeve & Valve EA 1 $ 3,200.00 $ 3,200.00 4" PVC Force Main LF 17 $ 21.00 $ 357.00 4"x2" Reducer EA 1 $ 350.00 $ 350.00 2" Poly Force Main LF 15 $ 12,00 $ 180.00 1 Subtotal 1 $ 7,704.001 Sewer r $ 7,704.00 $ 17,155.00 AL $ 24,869.00 For [Maintenance Amount @ 26% 6,214.761 JodahNgittle, P.E'. A Date: IZ, 1z'/7 No, 57396, EXHIBIT "A" APPROVED TILITIES 528 z INDIAN RIVER COUNTY SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL DISTRICT BOARD MEMORANDUM Date: March 9, 2018 To: Jason E. Brown, County Administrator From: Vincent Burke, P.E., Director of Utility Services IS -13.), Departmental Item Prepared By: Himanshu H. Mehta, P.E., Managing Director, Solid Waste Disposal District (SWDD) Subject: Request to Approve Agreement with Comtech Systems for Communication Equipment Testing at the IRC Landfill BACKGROUND: Comtech Systems, Inc. (Comtech) provides telecommunication systems to the United States military and occasionally has need of local land to conduct tests for the government. Comtech has requested the use of the Indian River County Landfill site to perform such tests. Below is a picture of a typical testing system. V. Comtech has offered to pay the Solid Waste Disposal District (SWDD) a land use fee of $150 per day to allow them to test the equipment up to four (4) times per year over the next two-year period. Typical testing is seven (7) to ten (10) days long. Comtech would setup and remove the testing equipment, and ensure the site is cleaned up before they leave each time. Comtech has stated that no hazardous activity (radiation, chemicals, or fumes) would exist, and they carry a $2 million liability policy. Their activities are restricted to daylight hours and have no impact to the land. @BCL@COODF097.docx 529 Page-1— ANALYSIS: Staff has reviewed the request with both the County Attorney's office and the County Risk Manager, and there are no objections to such use. SWDD staff has no objection for allowing this use and recommends approval of the attached use agreement. FUNDING: There is no funding requirement for this agreement. SWDD staff will coordinate with Comtech to receive the $150 per calendar day use fee based on actual days on site. The fee will be transferred to the Indian River County Finance department to add to the SWDD revenue account. It is estimated that with a maximum usage of 40 days per year, the total revenue from this agreement over the next two years would be $12,000. Description Account Number Amount Miscellaneous Revenue 411038-369900 $12,000 RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the SWDD Board review and approve the Entry & Testing Agreement with Comtech Systems, Inc. and authorize the Chairman to sign on their behalf, once the agreement is reviewed and approved as to form and legal sufficiency by the County Attorney, and the necessary insurance requirements submitted to the Purchasing Department. Attachment: 1. Entry & Testing Agreement with Comtech Systems, Inc. @BCL@COODF097.docx 530 Page — 2 — ENTRY & TESTING AGREEMENT THIS ENTRY & TESTING AGREEMENT ("Agreement"), made this day of 2018, by and between Solid Waste Disposal District (SWDD), a dependent special district of INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, a Political Subdivision of the State of Florida organized and existing under the Laws of the State of Florida, (hereinafter called Owner), whose address is 1325 74th Avenue SW, Vero Beach, FL 32968 (collectively and individually, "SWDD") and Comtech Systems, Inc. on its own behalf and on behalf of its wholly-owned subsidiaries and affiliates (collectively and individually, "Company") having an office at 212 Outlook Point Drive, Suite 100, Orlando, FL 32809 WHEREAS, Indian River County Solid Waste Disposal District (SWDD) owns, manages, and operates the facilities ("Sites") identified in the attached Exhibit A; and WHEREAS, Company desires to determine the viability and feasibility of the certain Site, as a communications facility and to do so it is necessary for employees, agents, or independent contractors of Company to enter upon and inspect the Site and/or temporarily locate communications equipment on the Site to conduct industry standard due diligence tests and studies specifically including drive testing or similarly related activities; and WHEREAS, the Solid Waste Disposal District and Company wish to define the rights, duties and liabilities between them and to assure that the interests of SWDD are adequately protected; NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants contained herein and intending to be legally bound, the parties agree as follows: 1. Access. Prior to obtaining access for itself and or its agents or independent contractors to any Site listed in the attached Exhibit A, Company shall provide to SWDD a written description of the activities to be performed at the Site and the equipment to be temporarily located at the Site including its intended location within the Site. SWDD shall, within forty-eight (48) hours of receipt of said descriptions and an insurance certificate per item 2, approve or deny Company's request for access to the Site(s). SWDD failure to respond to Company's request within the time period set forth above shall constitute a denial of Company's request for access to the Site to perform the specified work. Company's access to the Site hereunder shall commence within thirty (30) calendar days of SWDD approval and end ninety (90) calendar days but to not exceed one -hundred and twenty (120) calendar days commencing upon initial entry to the Site by Company and/or its contractor. Company agrees that its activities and equipment or that of its agents or independent contractors will not cause damage to, or in any way interfere with the operation of, other equipment and systems then in operation at the Site. COMPANY OR ITS AGENTS MAY NOT PERFORM ELEVATED WORK AT THE SITE. Insurance. Company shall maintain, at its expense, General Liability Insurance with a combined single limit of $1,000,000 for bodily injury and property damage and a $2,000,000 aggregate. Contractor shall provide a certificate of insurance to INDIAN RIVER COUNTY SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL DISTRICT evidencing SWDD as a certificate holder and as an additional insured, and shall contain a provision for thirty (30) days' notice to SWDD of cancellation or material change in the policy. Contractor shall also maintain Auto Liability Insurance in an amount no less than $1,000,000.00 combined single limit for bodily injury and/or property damage. Contractor shall maintain Statutory Workers' Compensation Insurance and Employer's Liability to statutory limits. • General Liability: $1m occurrence / $2m aggregate • Auto Liability: $1m • Workers Comp: Statutory • Endorsement must appear on certificate: "INDIAN RIVER COUNTY SWDD" and all of its parent companies, joint ventures, subsidiaries, and affiliates and property owners are named as additional insured. 531 • Certificate Holder: The insurance "Certificate Holder" shall be addressed to Pinnacle Towers LLC, Legal Department, 2000 Corporate Drive, Canonsburg, Pa 15317 3. Indemnification. Company shall indemnify and hold SWDD, its parent, all of its subsidiary and affiliate companies, and property owners harmless against any claim of liability or loss from bodily injury and/or property damage resulting from or arising out of Company's and/or any of its contractors, servants, agents or invitees acts or omissions during its exercise of rights hereunder, and any breach of the terms, covenants and conditions of this Agreement, including, but not limited to any claim of liability or loss associated with any Environmental Hazards as defined in this Agreement, excepting, however such claims or damages to the extent due to or caused by the sole negligence or willful misconduct of SWDD, or its independent contractors, servants, agents or invitees. If SWDD is made a party to any litigation commenced by or against Company for any of the above reasons, then Company shall protect and hold SWDD harmless and pay all costs, penalties, charges, damages, expenses and reasonable attorneys' fees incurred or paid by SWDD in connection therewith. 4. Environmental Matters. Company and its agents and independent contractors shall not bring to, transport across or use any Environmental Hazards on any Site without SWDD's prior written approval. Company's use of any approved substances constituting Environmental Hazards must comply with all applicable laws, ordinances and regulations governing such use. The term "Environmental Hazards" means hazardous substances, hazardous wastes, pollutants, asbestos, polychlorinated biphenyl (PCB), petroleum or other fuels (including crude oil or any fraction or derivative thereof) and underground storage tanks. The term "hazardous substances" shall be defined in the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act, and any regulations promulgated pursuant thereto. The term "pollutants" shall be as defined in the Clean Water Act, and any regulations promulgated pursuant thereto. Payment. Company shall pay to SWDD the amount of $150.00 per calendar day that the Comtech equipment is on the SWDD site as consideration for the rights granted to Company herein. Such payment shall be made upon full execution of this Agreement and payable based on the duration of use at a net term of 30 calendar days. 6. Renewal and Termination. The Company may request in writing to SWDD Managing Director to renew the agreement at least four (4) times per year. The request for renewal shall not be unreasonably refused. The Agreement shall terminate after two (2) years. Radio Frequency Exposure Safety. i. Company represents and warrants and shall cause its agents, independent contractors, servants, and invitees to represent and warrant that they are fully aware of and knowledgeable about the inherent dangers of working on or near tower, rooftop, or other wireless communication sites that are "live", i.e., that are actively receiving and/or transmitting radio signals that may create radio frequency radiation ("RFR") (hereinafter "Live Sites"). ii. Company shall implement all procedures and take all measures necessary to ensure that only those Company's employees or agents or its independent contractor's employees or agents who make the representations set forth in this subsection i., and who have satisfactorily completed RFR safety training in accordance with FCC OET 65, the most current applicable updates in OSHA regulations and guidelines, and commonly recognized industry practices, may enter a Live Site or perform work on a Live Site. SWDD shall have no responsibility whatsoever to monitor access to the Live Sites, or to monitor the performance of work on such Live Sites, by Company's or its lower tier contractor's employees or agents, or to verify training of the same. iii. The presence at, or performance of any work on a Live Site by any of Company's or its lower tier contractor's employees or agents (i) who have not made the above representations, and (ii) who have not satisfactorily completed RFR safety training, shall constitute a material breach of this Agreement. Upon such material breach, SWDD shall have the right to immediately terminate this Agreement, and Company shall be liable to SWDD for any damages and costs incurred a result of said termination. 532 8. Compliance. Company and its agents and independent contractors shall comply with all laws, statutes, ordinances, rules and regulations, which are applicable to the jurisdiction in which the Site is located. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Agreement to be executed as of the date first above written, intending to be legally bound hereby. Owner: INDIAN RIVER COUNTY SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL DISTRICT By: _ Date: Peter D. O'Bryan, Chairman APPROVED: By: Jason E. Brown, County Administrator APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGAL SUFFICIENCY: By: Dylan Reingold, County Attorney ATTEST: Jeffrey R. Smith, Clerk of Court and Comptroller Attest: Deputy Clerk Contractor: COMTECH SYSTEMS, INC. By:.�91 9 Mar 2018 John W. Boelke, Vice President of Contracts 533 Entry & Testing Agreement 3 1 4 Revision L iTdi`5t5Vi'go P -. l�51•SWF �-'-•-•.." "•� '1:#MSi�SW- •. - -. — • _ 1Jthr9t.m ''rndian River w. '�— �1 S All n .y�nr• � .. � yr ` � `" `� � L �4 L � , _,.✓1 Approximate Location,of Comtech Equipment r�t ch _ � x • isu, _