Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
06/19/2018
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS INDIAN RIVER COUNTY FLORIDA COMMISSION AGENDA TUESDAY, JUNE 19, 2018 - 9:00 AM Commission Chambers Indian River County Administration Complex 1801 27th Street, Building A Vero Beach, Florida, 32960-3388 www.ircgov.com COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Peter D. O'Bryan, Chairman, District 4 Jason E. Brown, County Administrator Bob Solari, Vice Chairman, District 5 Dylan Reingold, County Attorney Susan Adams, District 1 Jeffrey R. Smith, Clerk of the Circuit Court and Comptroller Joseph E. Flescher, District 2 Tim Zorc, District 3 1. CALL TO ORDER 2.A. A MOMENT OF SILENT REFLECTION FOR FIRST RESPONDERS 2.B. INVOCATION 3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Deputy Teddy Floyd, IRC Sheriffs Office 4. ADDITIONS/DELETIONS TO THE AGENDA / EMERGENCY ITEMS Dylan Reingold, County Attorney 5. PROCLAMATIONS and PRESENTATIONS 6. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 7. INFORMATION ITEMS FROM STAFF OR COMMISSIONERS NOT REQUIRING BOARD ACTION 7.A. Proclamation Honoring Kenneth Campbell on His Retirement From Indian River County Board of County Commissioners Department of General Services Recreation Division 7.B. 7.C. Indian River County Venue Event Calendar Review Notice of Application for Division of Historic Resources Special Category Grant for the Roseland Community Building June 19, 2018 Page 1 of 5 7.D. Resignation of Joe Idlette, Jr., from the Community Development Block Grant Citizen Advisory Task Force. 8. CONSENT AGENDA 8.A.. Checks and Electronic Payments June 1, 2018 to June 7, 2018 8.B. Approval of 2019 Holiday Schedule 8.C. Consideration of New Five -Year Agreement between Indian River County and the Senior Resource Association, Inc. for Provision of Public Transportation Services 8.1). Request for Authorization to Submit an Application for 49 USC CH. 53, Section 5311 Transit Operating Assistance Funds for FY 2018/19 8.E. Third Renewal and. Extension of a License Agreement for Security and Caretaker Occupancy of the Ryall Tract of the South Prong Preserve Conservation Area 8.F. Work Order No. 7 - Morgan & Eklund, Inc., 2018 Beach Profile Monitoring Surveys (SUMMER) 8.G. Amendment No. 1 - FDEP Grant Agreement No. 17IR2, Wabasso Beach Restoration Project (Sector 3) 8.11. Recommendation of Award for Bid No. 2018056: Archie Smith Fish House Dock Restoration 8.I. Land Purchase - Future Expansion Owner: Norman R. Lamothe & Roberta F. Lamothe 405 35th Avenue, Vero Beach, FL 32968 8.J. Children's Services Advisory Committee's Funding Allocations for FY 2018-2019 8.K. Approval of Blue Goose Construction Work Authorization 2018-003: "61st Drive Water Main Replacement" 8.L. Approval of Blue Goose Construction Work Authorization 2018-004: "12th Avenue SW Water Service Replacement" 8.M. IRC Courthouse - Proposed new Comcast ISP Service for WIFI and Cellular Signal Extender 8.N. City Of Vero Beach Appointment to TCRPC 8.0. Request for Amended Access Easement to Datapath Tower LLC for. former Emergency Services Tower 9. CONSTITUTIONAL OFFICERS and GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES 10. PUBLIC ITEMS A. PUBLIC HEARINGS June 19, 2018 Page 2 of 5 10.A.1. Request by David J. Haeseler, Eve D. Haeseler, Nancy Ellen Casey, Trustee, Florida Academy of Impairment Ratings, Inc., and Kashi Church Foundation, Inc. for the Abandonment of Two Twenty Foot Wide Roadway Easements Over Lots 1, 2, 3, and 4, POD G Village of Kashi PD [ROW -18-02-02 / 2008110007-80637] (Legislative) 10.A.2. Henry Collier and William Anderson's Request for Abandonment of a Portion of 4th Street SW within the Waldo's Way Subdivision [ROWA-18-01-01 / 93090035-80435] (Legislative) 10.A.3. First Public Hearing to Consider Applying for a Community Development Block Grant and Request for Authorization to Proceed with Consultant Selection Process (Legislative) 10.A.4. Public Hearing: Amending Indian River Code Creating Chapter 318, Stormwater Discharge (Legislative) B. PUBLIC DISCUSSION ITEMS 10.B.1. Request to Speak from Deirdre King Regarding Failure to Enforce IRC Code 10.B.2. Request to Speak from Ken Roberts, Pickleball University, Regarding Dedicated Pickleball Facilities in Indian River County C. PUBLIC NOTICE ITEMS 11. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR MATTERS 11.A. Resolution Granting Area of Operation Authority for the Escambia County Housing Finance Authority to Issue Multifamily Housing Revenue Bonds to Finance a Project in Indian River County 12. DEPARTMENTAL MATTERS A. Community Development B. Emergency Services C. General Services 1. Human Services 2. Sandridge Golf Club 3. Recreation D. Human Resources E. Office of Management and Budget F. Public Works G. Utilities Services 12.G.1. Biosolids Technical Advisory Committee June 19, 2018 Page 3 of 5 13. COUNTY ATTORNEY MATTERS 14. COMMISSIONERS MATTERS A. Commissioner Peter D. O'Brvan, Chairman 14.A.1. Study of Biosolid Runoff in Blue Cypress Lake B. Commissioner Bob Solari, Vice Chairman 14.13.1. Blue Cypress Lake and Biosolids C. Commissioner Susan Adams 14.C.1. Indian River Lagoon Master Plan D. Commissioner Joseph E. Flescher E. Commissioner Tim Zorc 15. SPECIAL DISTRICTS AND BOARDS A. Ernmency Services District 15.A.1. Approval of Property Lease Extension for Temporary Location of Fire Rescue Station No. 7 (1893 90th Avenue) B. Solid Waste Disposal District C. Environmental Control Board 16. ADJOURNMENT Except for those matters specifically exempted under the State Statute and Local Ordinance, the Board shall provide an opportunity for public comment prior to the undertaking by the Board of any action on the agenda, including those matters on the Consent Agenda. Public comment shall also be heard on any proposition which the Board is to take action which was either not on the Board agenda or distributed to the public prior to the commencement of the meeting. Anyone who may wish to appeal any decision which may be made at this meeting will need to ensure that a, verbatim record of the proceedings is made which includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal will be based. Anyone who needs a special accommodation for this meeting may contact the County's Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Coordinator at (772) 226-1223 at least 48 hours in advance of meeting. Anyone who needs special accommodation with a hearing aid for this meeting may contact the Board of County Commission Office at 772-226-1490 at least 20 hours in advance of the meeting. The full agenda is available on line at the Indian River County Website at www.iregov.com The full agenda is also available for review in the Board of County Commission Office, the Indian River County Main Library, and the North County Library. June 19, 2018 Page 4 of 5 Commission Meetings are broadcast live on Comcast Cable Channel 27 Rebroadcasts continuously with the following proposed schedule: Tuesday at 6:00 p.m. until Wednesday at 6:00 a.m., Wednesday at 9:00 a. m. until 5: 00 p. m., Thursday at 1:00 p.m. through Friday Morning, and Saturday at 12:00 Noon to 5:00 p.m. June 19, 2018 Page 5 of 5 1'ROCLA1VlATl01V HONORING KENNETH CAMPBELL ON HIS RETIREMENT FROM INDIANRIVER C0UNTYBOARI) OF CO UNTY COMMISSIONERS DEPARTMENT OF GENERAL SERVICES RECREATIONDIVISION WHEREAS, Ken Campbell has announced his retirement from the Recreation Division and Indian River County Board of County Commissioners effective July 7, 2018; and WHEREAS, Ken Campbell began his career with Indian River County on August I8, 2006 as a Recreation Leader, and served in this capacity throughout the years until his retirement; and WHEREAS, Ken Campbell has served this County and the Public with distinction and se lessness. During his ten years of service, he was dedicated, and his work was greatly appreciated by his employer, citizens and co=workers alike; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT PROCLAIMED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that the Board applauds the efforts of Ken Campbell on behalf of this County, and the Board wishes to express their appreciation for his dedication and the exemplary service he has given to Indian River Countyfor the last ten years; and BE IT FURTHER PROCLAIMED that the Board of County Commissioners and staff extend heartfelt wishes for success in his future endeavors. Acknowledged this 191" day of June 2018. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS INDLINRIVjER COUNTY, FLORIDA i Peter D. O'Bryan, Chairiran 7� Indian River County Venue Event Calendar Review For more information go to www.ircgov.com - Event Calendar South County Community Meeting July 2 @ iG Center: • 5:30-7pm: Local topics with Commissioner Peter O'Bryan Private Event July 7 @ Fairgrounds: • 2:30 - Midnight Private Event July 14 @ Fairgrounds: • 4 - 11:30pm Community Office Hours Event July 19 @ North IRC Library: • I Oam- One on one with Commissioner Susan Adams Gifford Aquatic CLOSED for Private Party July 21 @ Gifford Aquatic Center: • 9am-lpm Vero Beach Gun Show www.patriotshows.com July 21-22 @ IRC Fairgrounds: • Saturday 9am-5pm • Sunday 9am-4pm Estate Planning Services by CLA Estate Services July 25 @ iG Center: • l oam-2pm: Financial Planning Event Headstart Orientation, hosted by the EOC of IRC July 31 @ iG Center: • 6-8pm: Headstart Program orientation 2 Private Event Aug 4 @ iG Center: 1-4pm South County Community Meeting Aug 6 @ iG Center: • 5:30-7pm: Local topics with Commissioner Peter O'Bryan Private Event Aug 11 @ iG Center: • 1-5pm Community Office Hours Event Aug 16 @ North IRC Library: • l0am- One on one with Commissioner Susan Adams Private Event Aug 18 @ Fairgrounds: • 4pm - 11 pm 3 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA AGENDA ITEM Assistant County Administrator / Department of General Services �e Date: June 11, 2018 To: The Honorable Board of County Commissioners Thru: Jason E. Brown, County Administrator Thru: Michael C. Zito, Assistant County Administrator From: Beth Powell, Conservation Lands Manager Subject: Notice of Application for Division of Historic Resources Special Category Grant for the Roseland Community Building DESCRIPTIONS AND CONDITIONS: On April 1, 2018, the Division of Historical Resources' Special Category grant application period opened for the period of 2019-2020. The grant program provides state funds for historic preservation projects. The purpose of the program is to provide funding to assist local, regional and state-wide efforts to preserve significant historic and archaeological resources that will promote knowledge and appreciation of Florida's history. The Roseland Community Building was constructed and utilized as a community center and local meeting place since Indian River County was established in 1925. It has been the main meeting place of the Roseland Women's Club since the late 1920's until damage to the building was discovered in 2017 which has made it unsafe for public occupancy. On March 7, 2017, the Board directed the Public Works Department to stabilize the building through a contract with a licensed general contractor. On June 13, 2017, the Board authorized Work Order No. 7 to MBV Engineering to complete a building and structural engineering analysis to determine the extent of repairs necessary and the associated preliminary costs for repairs. On August 17, 2017, the Final Structural Report was provided to the County which detailed specific areas of repair necessary to stabilize the building and to make it safe for use by the public. On October 17, 2017, Commissioner Adams presented an update to the Board of County Commissioners regarding the Roseland Community Building and the final report of the MBV Work Order #7. The report has been utilized to generate the necessary details for application to the State for funding under the Special Categories Grant which was submitted on June 1, 2018. THE PROJECT: This grant application centers onfunding improvements to the Roseland Community Center. The 1,400 square foot building was constructed in the early 1920's by a local builder with lumber that was salvaged from the Sebastian River Bridge (circa 1900). With the exception of minor improvements in the 1930's (porch enclosed and restroom added) and 1950's (basement added to the west side of the building), the building maintains much of its original character and use. Nestled in the Roseland Community Park, it is the only County building that overlooks the St. Sebastian River. The building has served as the meeting 4 C:\Users\legistar\AppData\Local\Temp\BCL Tech nologies\easyPDF 8\@BCL@7C150968\@BCL@7C150968.docx location of the Roseland Women's Club since the early 1920's and, up until recently, has served the community for various community meetings and events. The County has applied for funding through the Department of State, Florida Division of Historical Resources' Special Category Grant cycle for July 2019- 2020. Through this grant, if funded and approved by the Board of County Commissioners, the County proposes to complete items identified in the MBV Engineering assessment dated August 15, 2017. Items of specific need are structural improvements, repainting, repairing rotted/damaged wood and masonry, repairing and refinishing the floors and replacing the roof with a metal roof similar to what was original to the building in the 1920's. A complete copy of the application submitted to the Department of Historical Resources as Special Category Grant — "Roseland Community Building Rehabilitation" is on file at the County Commissioners' Office. Partners who have shown an interest and provided letters of support are the Roseland Women's Club, Sebastian Area Historical Society, Roseland Community Association, Friends of the St. Sebastian River, Roseland Christian Preschool, Sebastian Property Owners Association, Ecumenical Council Food Pantry, as well as over 500 petitioned signatures on file and various letters of support from individuals.. FUNDING: The total requested from the Division of Historical Resources is $103,100 with a 50% County match for a total project cost of $206,200. If funded and approved by the Board of County Commissioners, the County proposes to match the funds with the optional sales tax. Attachments: ***Attachment A — Department of Historical Resources Special Category Grant—Roseland Community Building Rehabilitation Grant Application 5 C:\Users\legistar\AppData\Local\Temp\BCL Technologies\easyPDF 8\@BCL@7C150968\@BCL@7C150968.docx RMEMA n COMMUMMCENMR -2018 - DIVISION 2018 -DIVISION OF HISTORICAL RESOURCES SPECIAL CATEGORY GRANT T 6/1/2018 https://dosgrants.com/Gra6tApplication/PrintPreview?gid=5127 Indian. River County Parks Division Project Title: Roseland Community Building Rehabilitation Grant Number: 20.h.sc.100.163 A. Organization Information Page 1 of a. Organization Name: Indian River County Parks Division v b. FEID: 59-6000674 c. Phone number: 772.226.1873 d. Principal Address: 5500 77th Street Vero Beach, 32967 e. Mailing Address: 180.1 27th Street Vero Beach, 32960 f. Website: www.iregov.com g. Organization Type: County Government h. Organization Category: Government: Other i. County: Indian River j. DUNS number: 079208989 1. Designated. Project Contact " First Name Elizabeth Last Name Powell Phone 772.226.1873 Email bpowell@ircgov.com 2. Authorized Official * First Name Jason Last Name Brown Phone 772.226.1408 Email droy@ircgov.com 3. Applicant Grant Experience and History { Has the applicant received previous grant assistance within the past five years from any source? @Yes QNo ' 7 https:Hdosgrants.com/GrantApplicati6n/PrintPreview?gid=5127 1/14 6/1/2018 https://dosgrants.com/GrahtApplir.ation/PrintPreview?gid=5127 If yes, for each grant specify the year of the grant award, grant number, grant project name, the granting entity, the grant award amount, and its current status. Make sure to include any grants awarded by the Division or other State grants. # Previous Previous Previous Grant Project Name Previous Granting Previous Open/Closed Subtotal Grant Year Grant Entity Grant Number. Amount 1 2013 51429 Archie Smith Fish House Division of Historical $49,500 Closed $49,500 Restoration Resources 4. Proposed Project Team # Name Project Role Title Percentage of Time Email 1 Rich Szpyrka Project Manager 50 2 Beth Powell Grant Administrator 20 3 Roland Deblois Community Development Director/Planning 15 4 Ruth Stanbridge County Historian 15 5. Applicant staffing and hours' @Organization is open at least 40 hours per week and has at least one paid staff member in a management position OOrganization has some paid staff but they are not full-time , OOrganiiation is open part-time and has volunteer staff 0 https://dosgrants.com/GrantApplication/PrintPreviiBw?gid=5127 2114 6/1/2018 https://dosgrants.com/GrantApplication/PrintPreview?gid=5127 B. Project Information Page 2 of 9 C 1. Project Type * @Development Projects Development activities geared at preservation of properties open to the public, including: restoration, rehabilitation, reconstruction, and site-specific planning required for these activities Exception: Activities on religious properties are limited to building exterior envelope, excluding accessibility upgrades,.and structural elements of the building. @Archaeological Research Projects Archaeological research projects including: research and field investigations tied to large area surveys or excavation, analysis and publication of findings. QMuseum Exhibit Projects Museum exhibit projects for Florida history museums, including: research of exhibit content, exhibit design, fabrication,, and installation. @Acquisition Projects Acquisition of a single historic property or archaeological site, or group of such, in which all the resources have the same owner. For archaeological sites, an exception to the single owner provision may be made if the archaeological site extends on land that is contiguous, but owned by different property owners. 2. Project Title and Location Information The title should reflect the name. of the property, site, area, museum, or exhibit, and the goals of the proposed project. The title should be consistent with previous applications/awards. (For example, Smith House Rehabilitation, South Mill Archaeological Excavation, etc.) Project Title - 250 characters maximum Roseland Community Building Rehabilitation Name of Property (if applicable) Roseland Community Building Street Address (primary location where the proposed project will be carried out) - 250 characters maximum * 12973 Bay Street City (location of the proposed project) - 250 characters maximum Roseland Primary County (location of the proposed project) Indian River 3: Additional Counties Served Select any additional counties the project will serve. ® Brevard ® St. Lucie https:/Idosgrants.com/GrantApplication/PdntPreview?gid=5127 3/14 6/1/2018 https://dosgrants.com/GrantApplication/PrintPreview?gid=5127 C. Historical Significance Page 3 of 9 1. Historical Designation Indicate the type of historical designation currently held by the historic resource. For properties or sites that have been listed in the National Register or are contributing properties or sites within a National Register District, provide the date that the property, site or district was listed. Should you have questions regarding the National Register status of a property or site, contact the Division's National Register Staff at 1.800.847.7278 or 850.245.6300. Type of Historical Designation * 0 Individual Local Designation Historical Designation details # Property Name Date Designated 1 Roseland Community Center 9/9/2003 2. Historical Significance Explain the historic significance of the property, site, or resource(s) that is the subject of the proposed project - (Maximum characters 1500.) Roseland is a small community on the south bank of the St. Sebastian River and part of the Spanish land grant of George Fleming. Platted in 1889 as Wauregan, the Townsite was replatted as the Townsite of Roseland with a post office in 1892. A school, river park, church and community center were established in 1926. By 1930, Roseland had a population of 83 people and the community building that later became the Roseland Women's Club. Today, the building still serves the residents of Roseland and Indian River County. The one-story, approximately 1,400 square foot building and essentially remained the same since the early 1950s with very minor updates to the original 1920s frame vernacular. The windows have been replaced over time and the roof was converted from a metal standing seam type roof to asphalt shingle. The underpinnings for the house came from the old railway bridge that crossed the St. Sebastian River in the location where it remains today. Other key features of the building include minor alteration to the front facade Which can easily be replicated to the original era. The building was in use as recently as 2017 in much the same way which it was when constructed, as a community gathering center and focal point of the Roseland Community. The building is surrounded by a 0.74 acre park -like setting and dirt road with little traffic, overlooking the St. Sebastian River. For Historic Structures and Archaeological Sites, enter the Florida Master Site File (FMSF) Number (ex. 8ES1234). For Multiple site forms, just separate with a semicolon (;). If no FMSF form exists, applicants may be required to complete one as part of the requirements in a grant award agreement. 81RO341 For Historic Property, Indicate Year of the Original Construction (enter Year only) 1925 For Historic Property, Date(s) and Description of Major Alterations - (Maximum characters 300.) The 1,400 square foot, one-story building was constructed by a local builder with lumber that was salvaged from the original St. Sebastian River bridge (circa 1900). In the 1930s the original porch was converted to an enclosed porch and a restroom was installed. An addition and basement was added to the west side in the 1950s. Indicate Current Use of Historic Property and Proposed Use - (Maximum characters 300) Nestled in the Roseland Community Park, it is the only county building overlooking the St. Sebastian River. The building has served as the meeting location of the Roseland Women's Club since the early 1920's and is still the meeting location for various Roseland community meetings and events. With improvements, the location will continue to serve its residents. For Archaeological Sites, provide the Cultural Affiliation of the Site and Dates of Use or Occupation - (Maximum characters 300.) N/A 10 https://dosgrants.com/GrantApplication/PrintPreview?gid=5127 4/14 6/1/2018 hftps://dosgrants.com/GrahtApplication/PrintPreview?gid=5127 D. Project Specifics Page 4 of 1. Scope of Work - (Maximum characters 5000) In the space provided below,. briefly describe the scope of work for the project for which funding is requested. List the work items that will be completed during the grant period using the funds requested and the required match. Through this grant application, the County proposes funding structural improvements and rehabilitation of the structure. In August 2017, Indian River County hired MBV Engineering to complete a Structural Assessment of the building. The report recommends the following to be completed: replace roof, replace damaged siding, replace and repair window trim, repair masonry cracks, replace doors and windows, replace rotted wood pier, replace. rotted rafters, replace floor sheathing, replacement of flooring, drywall, damaged ceiling finishes, headers and install missing wall and floor insulation. The roof is damaged and will be replaced with a metal roof to code, but in the style consistent with the original construction (circa 1925). All materials and repairs will be made consistent with the style of the original structure. Windows proposed will be hurricane rated, but in keeping with the original style including six over six window panes. Decorative finishes and architectural features will be replaced to restore the original aesthetics consistent with the era. 2. Tentative Project Timeline (remember this is a 24 month grant period) * # Work Item Starting Date Ending Date 1 Finalize Grant Contract 7/1/2019 8/15/2019 2 Consultation with County Historian, Bldg Dept 8/15/2019 10/15/2019 3 Generate Scope of Work and Bid Documents 10/15/2019 1/15/2020 4 Bid Procedure 1/15/2020 4/15/2020 5 Award Contract/Finalize Contract Award 4/15/2020 5/15/2020 6 Submission of Engineered Drawings/Permitting 5/15/2020 10/15/2020 7 Structural Repairs/Replace Roof & Windows 10/15/2020 1/15/2021 8 All other repairs and architectural features 1/15/2021 4/15/2021 9 Final Walk Through & Issuance of CO 4/15/2021 6/15/2021 3. Development Projects Provide the estimated total square footage of the structure (the house or building, for example): 1,404 Provide measurable quantities for each work item listed in the Scope of Work (square footage, linear footage, unit counts, etc.): - (Maximum characters 3500) For example: square footage of floors to be refinished or walls to be repainted, linear footage of trim to be replaced, etc. If an element is not measureable in square feet, provide quantities (example: replace 15 door knobs): For More Detail, please see attached MBV Final Structural Report Dated 8/15/2017 Floor Framing Plan: repair and replace 6 2"x8' crosspieces & 2 sections of joists (3'x10') - approx. 64 I.f.; Remove and replace 1 _ masonry pier; replace rotted wood pier, shims and 6x6 floor joist Roof Framing Repair Plan: remove and replace 2x4 handfrarned trusses at 24" o.c. approx 1,000 sq. ft. Elevation Plan: Raise south-west corner of building - approx. 300 sq. ft. 11 https://dosgrants.com/GrantApplication/PrintPreview?gid=5127 5114 C�. 6/1/2018 https://dosgrants.com/GrantApplication/PrintPreview?gid=5127. Replace roof with 5V Metal Roof Repair all masonry and stucco Siding restoration and replacement as needed Remount or reseal 14 windows (various sizes) Install 2 new awnings consistent with 1925 era Install missing insulation Will you be hiring or contracting with professional architectural or engineering services to assist with the restoration work? @Yes ONo If no professionals are projected to be hired, explain why. (Maximum characters 500) 12 https://dosgrants.com/GeantApplication/PrintPreview?gid=5127 .6114. 6/1/2018 https://dosgrants.com/Grar!tApplication/PrintPreview?gid=5127 E. Budget and Match Page 5of9 1. Rural Economic Development Initiative (REDI) Reduction of Match Requirements Applicants with projects located in counties or communities that have been designated as a rural community in accordance with Section 267.0617, Florida Statutes, may request a may request a reduction of match to 25% of the requested amount.. (State agencies, state colleges, and state universities are not eligible for a REDI match reduction, regardless of project location.) Are you requesting a reduction? .Are you requesting a reduction? pYes ONo Are you a state agency, state college, or state university? pYes @No 2. Project Budget and Match Grant Funds and Match # Work Item Grant Funds Cash Match In -Kind Match Total 1 Repaint structure on lap siding elevations $2,500 $2,500 $0 $5,000 2 Remove and replace window trim $1,000 $1,000 $0 $2,000. 3 Replace damaged siding $7,500 $7,500 $0 $15,000 4 Replace Roof $22,500 $22,500 $0 $45,000 5 Repair Masonry $300 $300 $0 $600 6 Door and Window Repair/Replacement $11,000 $11,000 $0 $22,000 7 Rotted Wood Pier, Remove and Replace $2,000 $2,000 $0 $4,000 8 Remove and Replace Rotted 6x6 $2,000 $2,000 $0 $4,000 9 Remove and Replace Rotted Rafters $3,000 $3,000 $0 $6,000 10 Remove and replace floor sheathing $1,000 $1,000 $0 $2,000 11 Flooring Repair and Refinish $7,500 $7,500 $0 $15,000 12 Drywall Replacement $4,000 $4,000 $0 $8,000 13 Replace missing wall insulation $1,000 $1,000 $0 $2,000 14 Replace floor insulation $800 $800 $0 $1,600 Totals: $103,100 $103,100 $0 1$106;200 https://dosgrants.com/GrantApplication/PrintPreview?gid=5127 7/14 6/1/2018 fittps://dosgrants.com/GrantApplication/PrintPreview?gid=5127 # Work Item Grant Funds Cash Match In -Kind Match Total 15 Remove and replace moisture damaged ceiling $2,500 $2,500 $0 $5,000 (� finishes 16 Remove and replace headers $2,000 $2,000 $0 $4,000 17 Retrofit north gable end wall $5,000 $5,000 $0 $10,000 18 Retrofit north gable end wall $5,000 $5,000 $0 $10,000 19 Stabilize and south-west comer of building $2,500 $2,500 $0 $5,000 20 Engineering and Architectural Services $20,000 $20,000 1 $0 $40,000 Totals: $103,100 $103,100 $0 $206,200. Grant Funds Requested. $103,100 Total Match Amount. $103,100 Total Project Budget $206,200 Additional Budget Information/Clarification - (Maximum characters 2500.) Use this space to provide additional detail or information about the proposal budget as needed. For example, where the relationship between items in the budget and the objectives of the proposed project may not be obvious, provide clarification regarding the necessity for or contribution of those work items to the successful completion of the project. 3. Completed Project Activities. # Activity Description Date Completed Cost Value 1 Engineering. Services - Structural Report 8/15/2017 $8,300 2 Stabilization of East Side of Building 4/1/2017 $28,000 4. Operating Forecast - (Maximum characters 500.) Describe source(s) of funding for necessary maintenance, program support, and/or additional expenses warranted to sustain the proposed project after the grant period. The Public Works Department manages the Facilities Management Division which maintains public buildings and structures throughout the County. Funding for maintenance and general repair of the Roseland Community Center will be funded through the normal budget �• allocations for Facilities Management, provided through the General Fund. In addition, the Roseland Women's Club provides funding for minor repairs and monthly utilities. 14 https:Hdosgrants.com/OrantApplication/PrintPreview?gid=5127 8/14 6/1/2018 hftps://dosgrants.com/GrantApplication/PrintPreview?gid=5127 F. Property Information Page 6 of 9 1. Property Ownership. Enter name of the Property Owner and choose the appropriate owner type. If applicant is not the owner of the property, the applicant must secure Property Owner concurrence. The applicant shall provide a letter from the Property Owner that documents that the applicant has the permission of the Property Owner of record to conduct the proposed project on the owner's property and that the Property Owner is in concurrence with this application for grant funding. This letter shall be uploaded in the Support Materials section of this application. Does your organization own the property? @Yes ONo Property Owner Indian River County Type of Ownership @Non -Profit Organization OPrivate Individual or For -Profit Entity Note: Properties owned by private individuals or for-profit entities are not eligible for grant funding with the exception of Acquisition projects and site-specific Archaeological Research projects being undertaken by an eligible applicant organization. For Acquisition projects in which the current owner is a private individual or a for-profit entity, the owner must provide a signed commitment to donate or sell the property to the applicant. Donation or sale must occur during the grant period. OGovernmental Agency / 2. Threats or Endangerment - (Maximum characters 1500.) Discuss the immediate endangerment to the historic property, including existing or potential threats of loss or damage to the property, site, or information, as consequence. of issues such as inaction, deterioration, mass movement, impending demolition, or encroaching development Documentation material, such as newspaper articles or public notices, are to be uploaded in the Support Materials section of this application. The Roseland Community Building, a county asset and community gem, is currently in need ,of significant repair. The 88 year old building is suffering from termite damage, floor damage and structural settlement. The building is a vital part of the Roseland community established in 1889 (originally as Wauregan). Nestled in the Roseland Community Park, it is the only county building, overlooking the St Sebastian River. The building is listed on the Florida Master Site File of Historical Structures. It is referenced on the Roseland Historical Marker and included in the Historic Roseland Neighborhood Plan which was created by the Roseland Neighborhood Plan Task Force and adopted by the BOCC September 9th, 2003. The purpose of the Historic Roseland Neighborhood Plan is to create and identify goals to ensure that Roseland maintains its unique character, identity and sense of place. This building is an essential part of that sense of place and a part that we cannot recreate. On March 7t', 2017, staff brought an agenda item to the Indian River County Board of County Commissioners asking for direction regarding the Roseland Community Building. While doing work to prepare to address settlement of the building, termite damage was discovered. Construction was halted in order to assess the situation: Extensive termite damage was discovered as well as the need to address settlement in the southern and eastern portions of the building. On-going issues related to degradation of the roof, window trim and doors has also been discovered. It is important to note that currently the building is not able to be occupied. This has impacted the Roseland and Indian River County residents who prior to closure, provided cultural recreation and communal meeting space. 15 https://dosgrants.com/GrantApplication/PrintPreview?gid=5127 9/14 6/1/2018 https://dosgrants.com/GrantApplication/PtintPreview?gid=5127 G. Protection and Impact Page 7of9 1. Local Protection Indicate the level(s) of local protection currently afforded the:project historic property or site and upload a copy of the local protection documents in the Support Materials section of this application. Local Protection Level(s).' ® Local Ordinance Design Review 2. Annual Visitation What is the :estimated or anticipated Annual Visitation for the project property or site? 5,000 What is the basis of these estimates? - (Maximum characters 200.) The building is a key meeting location for various organizations with the general oversight of the Roseland Women's Club. Approximately 2 organized groups met at the community center per week plus various other special events. 3. Anticipated Economic Impact - (Maximum characters 1500.) Explain the direct economic impact this project will have on the surrounding community. Include any information regarding number of jobs it will provide, if known. This project will provide an affordable community outreach location for schools, community and civic organizations as well as an event f venue for area residents, businesses and non-profit organizations. t, 4. Benefit to Minorities and the Disabled - (Maximum characters 1500.) Describe any direct benefit the project will have on minority groups and/or the disabled. Include any alterations to the site that will make the site more accessible to the public. If project includes media content, describe accessibility methods to be used (e.g. voice over, closed captioning, etc.) The Roseland Community Center will benefit minority and/or disabled visitors by allowing visitors the opportunity to access and enjoy the St. Sebastian River, Roseland Community Park and the surrounding area. 5. Educational Benefits and Public Awareness - (Maximum characters 1500.) Explain how the proposed project will educate the public on issues related to historic preservation, Florida history, and/or heritage preservation. As one of the oldest communities in Indian River County, Roseland has a number of historic buildings. The area and building has been incorporated into the Indian River County Historical Society's historical marker program and is included in the Indian River County county -wide historical educational material as well as supported through other educational programs provided by the Roseland Women's Club and the Roseland Community Association. The Community Center sits next to the St. Sebastian River. Rail Bridge of which the original pieces were incorporated into the building's foundation. With repairs, the building will once again be a cornerstone facility for the local residents who have enjoyed it since the early 1920s. 16 https:/Idosgrants.com/GrantApplication/PrintPreview?gid=5127 10/14 6/1/2018 hftps://dosgrants.com/GraritApplication/PiintPreview?gid=5127 H.. Support Materials Page8of9 1. Non -Profit Status 2. Substitute W-9 Form File Name File Size 2018 W-9.pdf 504 [KB] 3. Documentation of Confirmed Match File Name File Size Attachment1.pdf 263 [KB] 4. Letters of Support File Name 20180601 —Attachment 2_SupportLetters_WCover.pdf 5. Photographs File Name 2018_0601—Attachment 3_Photos.pdf 6. Representative Image �T File Name 20:18_0601_Presentation Photo.pdf View (opens in new window) View file View (opens in new window) View file File Size View (opens in new window) 32450 [KB] View file File Size View (opens in new window) 3618 [KB] View file File Size View (opens in new window) 277 [KB] View file 17 https://dosgrants.com/GrantApplication/PrintPreView?gid=5127 W14 C 6/1/2018 https://dosgrants.com/GrantAppiication/PrintPreview?gid=5127 7. Architectural Drawings (for Development Projects only, if available) 8. Appraisal(s) and Purchase Documents (for Acquisition Projects only). 9. Archaeological Supporting Documents (for Archaeological Research Projects only) 10. Exhibit Supporting Documents (for Museum Exhibit Projects only) 11. Documentation of Threat or Endangerment. File Name File Size View (opens in -new window) 2018_0601_RCC_6_EngRep Threat.pdf 14235 [KB] View file 12. Local Protection File Name File Size View (opens in new window) Attachment 7 = Local Protection.pdf 2689 [KB] View file 13. Owner Concurrence Letter 14. Optional Materials File Title Description Size Type View (opens in new window) Master Attachlriment Covers 8.pdf Site Map/Location Map 3645 [KB] View file hftps:Hdosgrants.com/OtantApplicatioh/PrintPreview?gid=5127 12/14 6/1/2018 hftps://dosgrants.com/GrantApplication/PrintPreview?gid=5127 L. Review and Submit Page 9 of 9 (� 1. Review and Submit ®1 hereby certify that I am authorized to submit this application on behalf of Indian River County Parks Division and that all information indicated is true and accurate. I acknowledge that my electronic signature below shall have the same legal effect as my written signature. I am aware that making a false statement or representation to the Department of State constitutes a third degree felony as provided. for in s. 817.155, F.S., punishable as provided for by ss. 775.082, 775.083, and 775.084. Guidelines Certification * ®1 hereby certify that I have read and understand the guidelines and all application requirements for this grant program as outlined under section , Florida Statutes 267.0617 and 1A-39.001, Florida Administrative Code. Signature (Enter first and last name) Elizabeth Powell 19 https://dosgrants.com/GrantApplication/PrintPreview?gid=5127 13/14 6/1/2018 fittps:/Idosgrants.com/GrantApplication/PrintPreview?gid=5127 20 https://dosgrants.com/GrantApplication/PrintPreview?gid=5127 14/14 7D June 19, 2018 INFORMATIONAL ITEM .INDIAN RIVER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS INTER -OFFICE MEMORANDUM To: Members of the Board of County Commissioners Date: June 8, 2018 Subject: Resignation of Joe Idlette, Jr. from the Community Development Block Grant Citizen Advisory Task Force From: Misty L. Pursel Commissioner Assistant, District 1 At the June 8, 2018 meeting of the Community Development Block Grant Citizen Advisory Task Force, Mr. Joe Idlette, Jr. announced his resignation, effective immediately. Anyone interested in serving on the Community Development Block Grant Citizen Advisory Task Force will need to submit an application and resume to the Board of County Commissioners Office, County Administration Building A, 1801 27th Street, Vero Beach, FL 32960. Applications may be accessed on-line at www.ircgov.com/boards/committee applications or pickup from the Board of County Commissioner's Office, Administration Complex, Building A, Second Floor, Executive Offices, 1801 27th Street, Vero Beach, FL 32960. C:\Users\legistar\AppData\Local\Temp\BCL Technologies\easyPDF 8\@BCL@282C2799\@BCL@282C2799.doc 21 JEFFREY R. SMITH, CPA, CGFO, CDMA Clerk of Circuit Court R Comptroller Finance Department 1801 271h Street Vero Beach, FL 32960 TO: HONORABLE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS FROM: ELISSA NAGY, FINANCE DIRECTOR THRU: JEFFREY R. SMITH, COMPTROLLER DATE: June 7 2018 SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF CHECKS AND ELECTRONIC PAYMENTS June 1, 2018 to June 7, 2018 In compliance with Chapter 136.06, Florida Statutes, all checks and electronic payments issued by the Board of County Commissioners are to be recorded in the Board minutes. Approval is requested for the attached lists of checks and electronic payments, issued by the Comptroller's office, for the time period of June 1, 2018 to June 7, 2018. 22 CHECKS WRITTEN a TRANS .NBR DATE VENDOR AMOUNT 368031 06/01/2018 CLERK OF CIRCUIT COURT 1.2,303.00 368032 06/01/2018 D AMICO. ANTHONY & NANCY 2,642.00 368033 06/01/2018 HOUSING AUTHORITY 775.08 368034 06/01/201.8 ORANGE COUNTY HOUSING & C D 652.08 368035 06/01/2018 VERO BEACH EDGEWOOD PLACE LP 524.00 368036 06/01/201.8 GRACES LANDING LTD 9,018.00 368037 06/01/201.8 LINDSEY GARDENS LTD 5,369.00 368038 06/01/2018 BRYAN D BLAIS 343.00 368039 06/01/201.8 WILLIE C REAGAN 445.00 368040 06/01/2018 RIVER PARK ASSOCIATES LIMITED 14,562.00 368041 06/01/2018 CREATIVE CHOICE HOMES XVI LTD 11,933.00 368042 06/01 /2018 ST FRANCIS MANOR OF VERO BEACH 268.00 368043 06/01/2018 CITY OF VERO BEACH 86.00 368044 06/01/2018 TREASURE COAST HOMELESS SERVICES 831.00 368045 06/01/2018 VENETIAN APARTMENTS OF VERO BEACH 386.00 368046 06/01/2018 PINNACLE GROVE LTD 7,024.00 368047 06101/2018 VERO CLUB PARTNERS LTD 10,401.00 368048 06/01%2018 DAVID SPARKS 378.00 368049 06/01/2018 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY HOUSING AUTHORITY 116.00 368050 06/01/2018 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY HOUSING AUTHORITY 370.00 368051 06/01/2018 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY HOUSING AUTHORITY 407.00 368052 06/01/2018 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY HOUSING AUTHORITY 41.7.00 368053 06/01/2018 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY HOUSING AUTHORITY 560.00 368054 06/01/2018 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY HOUSING AUTHORITY 1,193.00 368055 06/01/2018 CRAIG MERRI:LL 1,170.00 368056 06/01/201.8 CII.RISTINE SALTER 477.00 368057 06/01/2018 HAGGERTY FAMILY LTD 369.00 368058 06/01/2018 SUNQUEST'INC 4,409.00 368059 06/01/2018 THE PALMS AT VERO BEACH 12,608.00 368060 06/01/2018 FELLSMERE COMM ENRICHMENT PROGRAM INC 532.00 368061 06/01/2018 DAVID CONDON 657.00 368062 06/01/2018 HILARY MCIVOR 664.00 368063 06/01/2018 PAULA LANE 450.00 368064 06/01/2018 PELICAN ISLES LP 7,578.00 368065 06/012018 KATE TYSON LYONS 407.00 368066 06/012018 SUNCOAST REALTY & .RENTAL MGMT LLC 3,930.00 368067 06/012018 OAK RIVER PROPERTIES INC 248.00 368068 06/01/2018 SONRISEVILLAS LTD 1,490.00 368069 06/01/2018 ADINA GOLDMAN 542.00 368070 06/012018 INDIAN RIVER RDA LP 5,051.00 368071 06/01/2018 RICHARD L DAVENPORT 494.00 368072 06/01/2018 GEORGE THUYNS 565.00 368073 06/01/2018 LAZY J LLC 1,887.00 368074 06/01/201.8 SYLVIA.MCNEILL 719.00 368075 06/01/2018 SKOKIE HOLDINGS INC 426.00 368076 06/01/2018 ROGER WINSLOW 492.00 368077 06/012418 OSLO VALLEY PROPERTIES INC 185.00 368078 06/01/2018 SAID S MOOBARK 1,317.00 368079 06/012018 LINDSEY GARDENS 11 LTD 5,635.00 368080 06/012018 ANTHONYARROYO 683.00 368081 06/012018 AHS HOLDINGS GROUP LLC 2.580.00 368082 06/01/2018 DANIEL CORY MARTIN 732.00 368083 06/01/2018 YVONNE KOUTSOFIOS 54.00 368084 06/01/2018 ALAN R TOKAR 613.00 368085 06/01/2018 VERO BEACH VILLAS I LLC 462.00 368086 06/01/2018 BRIAN E GALLAGHER 540.00 368087 06/01.2018 STEPHANIE WATCHEK FOUNTAIN TRUST 1.62.00 368088 06/0.1/2018 SCOT WILKE 501.00 23 TRANS NBR DA'Z'E VENDOR AMOUNT 368089 06/0.1/2018 THEODORE BARTOSIEWICZ 505.00 368090 06/0112018 FOUNDATION FOR AFFORDABLE RENTAL 20,510.00 368091 06/01/2018 RICHARD KUSSEROW 469.00 368092 06/01%2018 ARE JAY INVESTMENTS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY IN 469.00 368093 06/01/201.8 SONRISE VILLAS 11 LLC 601.00 368094 06/01/2018 JOHN T STANLEY 782.00 368095 06/0112018 WEDGEWOOD RENTALS LLC 1,563.00 368096 06/01/2018 ALMA LUCKETT 852.00 368097 06/01/2018 LIVE OAKS REALTY INC 571.00 368098 06/01/2018 IBIS GARDENS APTS LLC 475.00 368099 06/01/2018 MCLAUGHLIN PROPERTIES LLC 892.00 368100 06/01/2018 JOYCE BODANZA 593.00 368101 06/01/2018 MYRIAM MELENDEZ 460.00 368102 06101 /2018 WATSON REALTY GROUP 3,689.00 368103 06/072018 PORT CONSOLIDATED INC 22._267.72 368104 06/07/2018 JORDAN MOWER INC 391.75 :368105 06/07/2018 COMMUNICATIONS INTERNATIONAL 23,264.62 368106 06/07/2018 RANGER CONSTRUCTION IND INC 1,394.61 368107 06/07201.8 VERO CHEMICAL DISTRIBUTORS INC 590.35 368108 06/0712018 RICOH USA 'INC 108.00 3681.09 06/07/2018 RICO:H USA INC 61.12 368110 06/072018 VELDE FORD INC 151.15 3681.11 06/072018 SAFETY PRODUCTS INC 363.07 368112 06/07/2018 AT&T WIRELESS 153.11 368113 06/072018 KELLY TRACTOR CO 2.61.0.22 368114 06/072018 MCMAST ER CARR SUPPLY CO 97.64 3681.15 06/072018 WILD LAND ENTERPRISES INC 469.48 368116 06/07/2018 LF] FORT PIERCE INC 506.25 368117 06/07/2018 DELL MARKETING LP 1,624.00 36811.8 06/072018 BLAKESLEE SERVICES INC 65.00 368119 06/07/2018 BAKER & TAYLOR. INC 7,250.93 368120 06/072018 MIDWEST TAPE LLC 1,327.43 368121 06/072018 MWI CORP 1,166.57 368122 06/07201.8 MICROMARKETING LLC 199.79 368123 06/072018 K & M ELECTRIC SUPPLY 41.69 3681.24 06/072018 ATKINS NORTH AMERICA INC 14,649.00 368125 06/071201.8 CENGAGE:LEARNING INC 91.50 368126 06/07/2018 SOFTWARE HARDWARE INTEGRATION 392.28 368127 06/072018 CITY OF VERO:BEACH 7,653.04 368128 06/072018 TREASURE COAST HOMELESS SERVICES 6,870.00 368129 06/07/2018 HUMANE SOCIETY 22,980.00 368130 06/072018 FLORIDA WATER & POLLUTION CONTROL 65.00 368131 06/072018 MUNICIPAL CODE CORPORATION 1,425.40 368132 06/072018 SUBSTANCE AWARENESS COUNCIL OF IRC INC 170.00 368133 06/07/2018 ROSEN CENTRE HOTEL 378.75 368.134 06/0712018 ROSEN CENTRE HOTEL 378.75 368135 06/07/2018 ROSEN CENTRE HOTEL 378.75 368136 06/07/2018 ROSEN CENTRE HOTEL 378.75 3681.37 06/07/2018 ROSEN CENTRE HOTEL 378.75 368138 06/07/2018 FLORIDA RECREATION & PARK ASSOC INC 300.00 368139 06/072018 FLORIDA' RECREATION & PARK ASSOC INC 300.00 368140 06/072018 FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT 91288.22 368141 06/072018 FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT 685.35 368142 06/072018 GIFFO.RD YOUTH ACHIEVEMENT CENTER INC 13,803.60 368143 06/07/2018 STRUNK FUNERAL HOMES & CREMATORY 425.00 368144 06/072018 FLORIDA DEPT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 25.00 368145 06/072018 WESTS.IDE REPROGRAPHICS OF VERO BEACH INC 11.88 368146 06/07/2018 CA.RIBE ROYALE HOTEL 560.00 368147 06/07/2018 RUSSELL PAYNE INC 360.78 368148 06/07201.8 TRANE US .INC 47,654.25 24 2 25 TRANS NBR DATE VENDOR AMOUNT 368149 06/07/2018 CELICO PARTNERSHIP 208.39 368150 06/07/2018 VAN WAL INC 168.00 368151 06/07/2018 DASIE BRIDGEWATER HOPE CENTER INC 4,191.52 368152 0610712018 SOUTHERN JANITOR SUPPLY INC 1,306.38 368153 06/07/201.8 SOUTHERN JANITOR SUPPLY :INC 3,060.95 368154 06/072018 CENTRAL .PUMP & SUPPLY INC 12.00 368155 06/0712018 MICHAEL ZITO 191.44 368156 06/07/2018 MASTELLER & MOLER INC 5,025.00 368157 06/072018 STAPLES CONTRACT & COMM:ERCIA.L INC 484.73 368158 06/07/2018 GLOVER OIL COMPANY INC 20,799.90 368159 06/07/2018 COAST TO COAST BUILDERS OF :FLORIDA INC 9.759.00 368160 06/07/2018 MADESSIA FLOWERS 60.00 368161 06/072018 WILBERT WILLIAMS 7,391.16 368162 06/07/2018 7RADEWINDS POWER CORP 63,433.15 368163 06107/2018 TREASURE COAST ELEMENTARY 6.00 368164 06/072018 LAZENBY & ASSOCIATES INC 421.07 368165 06107201.8 OVERDRIVE INC 1,658.33 368166 06/07201.8 BERMUDA SANDS APPAREL LLC 450.00 368167 06/072018 LIBERTY MAGNET ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 27.00 368168 06/072018 ALAN JAY CHEVROLET CADILLAC 26,245.33 368169 06/072018 MARK A ODOM CONSTRUCTION INC 2,000.00 368170 06/072018 LOWES HOME CENTERS INC 1,420.82 368171 06/072018 IMPECCABLE SIGNS INC 1.52.00 368172 06/072018 PENGUINRANDOM HOUSE .LLC 756.90 368173 06/072018 STE WART & STEVENSON FDDA LLC 541.65 368174 06/072018 MONA MOSHKI FEDERICI 20.00 368175 06/07/2018 THE LAW OFFICES OF 981.00 368176 06/072018 BERNARD EGAN & COMPANY 1,990.92 36$17706/07/2018 MASCH.M.EYER CONCRETE COMPANY OF FLORIDA 570.00 368178 06/07/2018 MICHAEL EDWARD HAMILTON 300.00 368179 06/072018 HAWK.INS INC 681.50 368180 06/072018 RANDY KING 7.13 368181 06/072018 MOCAVO.INC 995.00 368182 06/0720`18 UNIFIRST CORPORATION 803.48 368183 06/072018 JOHNSON-DAVIS'INCO:RPORATED 47,932.05 368184 06/0720:18 JAY AMMON ARCHITECT .INC 16,487.50 368185 06/072018 WILSON SPORTING GOODS CO 38.96 368.186 06/071201$ SITE0NE LANDSCAPE SUPPLY LLC 22.56 368187 06/072018 GOTTA GO GREEN ENTERPISES INC 118.92 3681.88 06107201.8 STEVES FROZEN CHILLERS OF FLORIDA SPACE CORS' 417.00 368189 06/07/2018 FREEDOM ROOFERS LLC 14,400.00 368190 06/072018 ASPHALT PAVING SYSTEMS INC 208,971.70 368191 06/072018 A&T EUROPE S P A 750.00 368192 061072018 PEOPLE READY INC 19,528.82 368193 06/072018 STRIVING 4 SUCCESS 1„341.18 368194 06/072018 RICHARD J DILLON 60.00 368195 06/07/201.8 STUART RUBBER STAMP & SIGN CO INC 32.79 368:196 06/072018 GOMEZ BROTHERS IRRIGATION LLC 1,21.5.00 368197 06/072018 AL1.BR1S 175.80 368,198 06/07/220 18 'WATSON REALTY GROUP 47.00 368199 06/072018 APTIM ENVIRONMENTAL & INFRASTRUTURE INC 30,720.74 368200 06/072018 TAYLOR ANNE RAT-FON 40.00 368201 06/072018 POWER PROTECTION SOL'UTION'S LLC 1,.175.00 368202 06/072018 MARCO BEACH OCEAN RESORT 418.00 368203 06/072018 NVR INC 26,055.24 368204 06/072018 AUSTIN HUNT 500.00 368205 06/072018 JEANNE E BIERMAN 663.00 368206 06/07/2018 THE SEMINAR GROUP 629.00 368207 06/072018 TONY PR:ESUTTI 250.00 368208 06107/2018 SAMANTHA BEEGLE 106.80 25 . TRANS NB.R DATE VENDOR .AMOUNT 368209 06/072018 JULIE HLWITT 53.40 368210 06/07/201.8 BRIANA SMITH 106.80 Grand TotA 894,148.72. 26 ELECTRONIC PAYMENT - VISA CARD TRANS. NBR DATE VENDOR AMOUNT 1013354 06105/2018 THE EXPEDITER 228.94 1013355 06/0512018 SOUTHERN COMPUTER WAREHOUSE 4,223.71 101.3356 06/05/2018 TOTAL TRUCK PARTS INC 910.14 1013357 06/05/2018 MIDWEST MOTOR SUPPLY CO 576.60 1013358 06/05/2018 RECHTIEN INTERNATIONAL TRUCKS 590.67 1013359 06/05/2018 METRO FERE PROTECTION SERVICES INC 455.40 1013360 06/05/2018 L&L,DISTRI:BUTORS 545.67 1013361 06/05/2018 WRIGHT FASTENER COMPANY LLC 480.00 1013362 06/05/2018 TIGHT LINE PRODUCTIONS INC 251.00 1013363 06/05/2018 FPS OFFICE SOLUTIONS LLC 26.23 1013364 06/06/2018 AT&T 21,214.84 1013365 06/06/2018 COMCAST 150.79 1013366 06/06/2018 COPYCOINC 129.33 101.3367 06/06/2018 MIKES GARAGE & WRECKER SERVICE INC 460.00 1013368 06/06/2018 SOUTHERN COMPUTER WAREHOUSE 874.92 1013369 06/06/2018 PACE ANALYTICAL SERVICES INC 108.00 1013370 06/07/2018 EVERGLADES FARM EQUIPMENT CO INC 3,548.28 1.013371 06/07/2018 COLKITT SHEET METAL & A/C INC 1,684.00 101.3372 06/07/2018 HELENA CHEMICAL 1,646.26 1013373 06/07/2018 COLD AIRDISTRIBUTORS WAREHOUSE 283.07 1013374 06/07/2018 INDIAN RIVER BATTERY 262.90 1013375 06/07/2018 DEMCO INC 117.57 1013376 06/07/2018 APPLE INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY CO 1,114.81 1013377 06/07/2018 SMITH BROTHERS CONTRACTING EQUIP 3,264.02 101.3378 06/07/2018 GALLS LLC 1,065.40 1013379 06/07/2018 ABCO GARAGE DOOR CO INC 310.00 1013380 06/07/2018 ALLIED UNIVERSAL CORP 10,038.19 101.3381 06/07/2018 IRRIGATION CONSULTANTS UNLIMITED INC 271.30 1013382 06/0712018 GROVE WIELDERS INC 56598 1013383 06/07/2018 FIRST 140SPITAL LABORATORIES INC 732.55 1013384 06/07/2018 COMM 01L COMPANY OF FLORIDA 550.38 1013385 06/0712018 GLOBAL GOLF SALES INC 267.79 1013386 06/07/2018 COMPLETE ELECTRIC INC 4,362.50 1013387 06/0712018 GREAT SOUTHERN EQUIPMENT CO 670.00 1013388 06/07/2018 HARCROS CHEMICALS, INC. 8,667.66 1.01.3389 06/07/2018 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL. DISTRIBUTORS INC 3,935.38 1013390 06/07/2018 ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION LABORATORIES IN 1,556.00 101.3391 06/0712018 HYDRA SERVICE (S) INC 13,904.00 1013392 06/07/2018 CM&S INDUSTRIES INC 4,015.00 1013393 06/07/2018 EASY PICKER GOLF PRODUCTS INC 244.69 101.3394 06107/2018 GUARDIAN ALARM OF FLORIDA LLC 420.00 1.013395 06/07/2018 FILTRATION GROUP CORPORATION 191.28 Grand Total: 94,915.25 27 ELECTRONIC PAYMENTS WIRE & ACH TRANS NBR DATE VENDOR P=CARD 06/01/2018 TD BANK, N.A. 5..965 06/01/2018 ST LUCIE BATTERY & TIRE CO 5966 06/01/2018 CLERK OF CIRCUIT COURT . 5967 06/01/2018 CDM SMITH INC 5968 06/01/2018 IRC FIRE FIGHTERS ASSOC 5969 06/01/2018 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY SHERIFF 5970 06/01/2018 IRIDIAN RIVER COUNTY SUPERVISOR OF ELECTIONS 5971 06/01/2018. NATIONWIDE SOLUTIONS RETIREMENT INC 5972 06/01/2018 NATIONWIDE SOLUTIONS RETIREMENT INC 5973 06/01/2018 CREATIVE BUS SALES INC 5974 06/01/2018 FIDELITY SECURITY LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY 5975 06/01/2018 TOTALADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES CORP 5976 06/04/2018 FL SDU 5977 06/04/2018 FL RETIREMENT SYSTEM 5978 06/04/2018 IRS -PAYROLL TAXES 5979 06/05/2018 1 R C HEALTH INSURANCE - TRUST 5980 06/06/2018 IRC CHAMBER OF COMMERCE 5981 06/06/2018 IRC CHAMBER OF COMMERCE Grand Total: AMOUNT 28,878.32 1,000.00 84,440.41 10,148.70 9,588.68 3;799,931.31 89,137.84 84,226.62 3,796.91 544.558.00 31118.45 11,011.29 6,261.92 582,325.81 405.602.36 632,779.98 21,579.14 19,929.96 6,338,3.15.70 O� CONSENT INDIAN RIVER COUNTY INTER -OFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: Jason Brown Holiday County Administrator FROM: Suzanne Boyll Martin Luther King Jr. Day Human Resources Director DATE: June 1, 2018 SUBJECT: 2019 Holiday Schedule For consideration by the Board of County Commissioners, the following is the proposed schedule of holidays for Indian River County employees for 2019: Holiday County Observance New Year's Day Tuesday, January 1, 2019 Martin Luther King Jr. Day Monday, January 21, 2019 Good Friday Friday, April 19, 2019 Memorial Day Monday, May 27, 2019 Independence Day Thursday, July 4, 2019 Labor Day Monday, September 2, 2019 Veterans Day Monday, November 11, 2019 Thanksgiving Day Thursday, November 28, 2019 Day after Thanksgiving Friday, November 29, 2019 Christmas Eve Tuesday, December 24, 2019 Christmas Day Wednesday, December 25, 2019 New Year's Day Wednesday, January 1, 2020 By. Jason Brown, County Administrator Date 29 CONSENT AGENDA INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA MEMORANDUM TO: Jason E. Brown; County Administrator THROUGH: Stan Boling, AICP; Community Development Director FROM: Phillip J. Matson, AICP; MPO Staff Director DATE: June 11, 2018 SUBJECT: Consideration of New Five -Year Agreement between Indian River County and the Senior Resource Association, Inc. for Provision of Public Transportation Services It is requested that the information herein presented be given formal consideration by the Board of County Commissioners at its regular meeting of June 19, 2018. DESCRIPTION, CONDITIONS, AND ANALYSIS Indian River County's public transportation system consists of the GoLine fixed route system and the Community Coach demand response (door-to-door) service. Both of these services are operated by the Senior Resource Association (SRA) In response to a request from the Federal Transit Administration, the County and the Senior Resource Association entered into an Agreement for Mass Transit Service Provision in 1999. That agreement has been renewed multiple times by both parties, with the most recent renewal occurring in 2013. The current agreement expires on June 30, 2018. Periodically, the County must advertise and solicit for transit providers and/or transportation coordinators. At its May 15, 2018 meeting, the Board of County Commissioners considered proposals in response to RFP# 2018040 and approved the selection of the Senior Resource Association, the top ranked proposer, for the management and operation of the County's public transportation services. In cooperation with the SRA, staff has prepared a new Agreement for Provision of Public Transportation Services (Attachment #1). The agreement identifies the responsibilities of the County and the SRA regarding grant application and administration, vehicle procurement and maintenance, drug and.alcohol testing, public comment on fare and service changes, handicapped accessibility, and other issues. The agreement also provides for County oversight of the SRA's transit activities to ensure compliance with federal regulations. As advertised in RFP# 2018040, the proposed agreement is effective for five years with two potential two-year extensions. C:\Users\legistar\AppData\Local\TCMP\BCL Technologies\easyPDF8\@BCL@603C95D7\@BCL@603C95D7.docx 310 FUNDING This is a continuation of a series of agreements to provide mass transit service in Indian River County. It does not commit the County to any specified level of financial support, which is approved by the Board of County Commissioners through its annual budget process. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners review the attached Agreement for Provision of Public Transportation Services between the County and the Senior Resource Association, Inc., make any necessary changes, and authorize the Chairman to execute the agreement. ATTACHMENTS 1. Agreement for Provision of Public Transportation Services C:\UsersVegistar\AppData\Local\Temp\BCL Technologies\easyPDF 8\@BCL r@i 603C95D7\ n@BCL@603C95D7.docx Ni AGREEMENT FOR MANAGEMENT AND OPERATIONS OF INDIAN RIVER PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION SERVICES by and between INDIAN RIVER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS and SENIOR RESOURCE ASSOCIATION, INC. This agreement (Agreement), entered into this 19th day of June , 2018, by and between the Indian River County Board of County Commissioners (County) and the Senior Resource Association, Inc. (SRA), establishes the responsibilities of each of the parties with respect to obtaining and administering public transportation capital and operating assistance authorized by 49 USC, Section 5307 and other provisions of Federal and State law governing the provision of Public Transportation services. The purpose of this agreement is to comply with Federal Transit Administration and FDOT requirements to establish formal procedures for grant application and administration activities. Recognizing that Indian River County has a need for public transportation service, the County agrees to provide the SRA with capital funding and operating assistance to provide such service. County funding will be a combination of federal grant funding, state grant funding, and local funding. In consideration of receipt of this funding, the SRA agrees to maintain and operate a Public Transportation system within Indian River County according to the provisions of this Agreement, the Scope of Work of contained in Indian River County Request for Proposals (RFP) # 2018040 (Attachment 1), and SRA's response to RFP# 2018040. I. The parties mutually agree to cooperate in providing public transportation service within Indian River County. Accordingly, each party acknowledges its responsibilities as detailed below, and agrees to discharge these responsibilities in the referenced timeframes. II. This Agreement shall be in effect through June 30, 2023, with 2 potential 2 -year extensions beyond the initial five (5) year period of the agreement, exercisable at the sole discretion of the County. Any revisions or modifications to this Agreement must be mutually agreed upon by both parties in writing. This Agreement may be terminated by SRA upon the provision of at least nine (9) months prior written notice. This Agreement may also be terminated upon failure of either party to discharge in good faith the duties and responsibilities prescribed in this Agreement. III. The parties hereby designate the following official representatives for purposes of this agreement: County: MPO Staff Director SRA: Chief Executive Officer Indian River County Public Transportation Service Agreement Pag32 IV. The responsibilities of the County are: a. To submit applications for Federal Transit Administration (FTA) and Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) grant funds: Each year, the County will coordinate with the SRA to project capital and operating funding needs for the following fiscal year. Using that information and other data provided by the SRA, the County will prepare and submit applications for funding through grant programs, such as FTA Section 5307 and Florida Public Transit Block Grant (PTBG). b. To administer and manaize Section 5307, PTBG, and other grant funds: The County will prepare and submit all applicable quarterly progress reports, financial status reports, invoices, requisitions, and closeout reports for Section 5307, PTBG, and other grant funds. These submittals will be based on information provided to the County by the SRA. The County agrees to reimburse the SRA within 30 days of receipt of the SRA's accurate monthly invoice for public transportation funding. The County may at the County's option provide funding on an advance basis. This advance will be provided in monthly draws no more than 1/12th of the annual operating budget paid in advance on the first day of each month. C. To maintain an accurate inventory of capital equipment purchased with Section 5307 PTBG, and other grant funds: For capital equipment purchased with grant program funds for which the County is the designated recipient, such as Section 5307, the County will take title to all rolling stock and other capital items purchased with those grant funds. -Consistent with its approved procedures, the County will tag all capital assets and add each asset to its fixed assets inventory records. These records will be maintained and updated as necessary. An inventory of all SRA Section 5307 and other grant program capital purchases will be conducted at least biennially. d. To provide assistance to and oversight of SRA's Public Transportation activities: The County will meet with the SRA on a quarterly basis to discuss transit system operations issues, including system performance, status of grant funds utilization, other budget matters, federal requirements, routes, ridership, problems, opportunities, and other issues. Meetings will be held on the last Wednesday in the months of January, April, July and October, or as mutually agreed upon. Besides attending quarterly meetings, County staff will be available to assist the SRA with any transit planning, budget, grant administration, or other issues. The County will oversee the SRA's public transportation program as specified in this Agreement and as otherwise necessary to ensure that the SRA complies with Indian River County Public Transportation Service Agreement Page all federal, state, and local requirements in its provision of public transportation service to Indian River County. The County will be responsible for verbal and written correspondence with the Federal Transit Administration and FDOT on all matters relating to the grant programs. Compliance with requirements will apply to all phases of operations as well as capital equipment, whether that equipment is purchased or leased. e. To staff the Indian River Counly Transportation Disadvantaged Local Coordinating Board (TDLCB): The County hereby establishes the TDLCB as the formal advisory board for public transportation operations in the county. The County agrees to staff the TDLCB and expeditiously present SRA matters, including transit route or schedule changes, to the TDLCB for consideration. V. The responsibilities of the SRA are: To provide public transportation service as identified in the County's adopted Transit Development Plan: The SRA shall provide fixed route/ADA/and Transportation Disadvantaged Public Transportation service in accordance with the route structure, fare structure, and schedule identified in the County's adopted Transit Development Plan (TDP). The SRA agrees to maintain the approved route structure, fare structure, and schedule unless a change in the route or fare structure or schedule has been approved by the County. Any SRA new service proposals to change its route structure, fare structure, or schedule will be implemented in accordance with the County's public comment procedures regarding transit fare and service changes. The SRA will maintain a record of all public comment and a record of all responses to public comments regarding proposed route, fare, or schedule changes. b. To invoice the County monthlypublic transportation costs incurred: The SRA shall provide (within 30 days after the end of the month) monthly invoices to the County detailing actual expenses for the prior month as compared to the draw received for that month. Subsequent monthly draws will be adjusted as needed to reconcile the actual expended amounts. The invoice form used by the SRA shall be approved by the County, and shall separately list invoice amounts for county funding, state funding, and federal funding. To provide the CoupV with quarterly performance and financial information: The SRA transportation coordinator will attend four (4) quarterly meetings with the County as referenced in IV (de) of this Agreement. At least one week prior to each quarterly meeting, the SRA will provide the County with a quarterly progress report and a financial status report for the just completed quarter. The quarterly progress report shall include a description of the status of each activity Indian River County Public Transportation Service Agreement Page line item contained in each active grant, including the major milestones required by FTA for each activity line item. The financial status report shall summarize all financial activity associated with each active Section 5307 grant for the just completed quarter. d. To close out any active Federal or State grants within the timeframes required for each grant: The SRA will ensure that all grant funds will be expended within the required timeframes of each grant. e. To provide the County with annual budget requests: By July of each year, the SRA will provide the County with estimates of needed capital and operating funds for the next fiscal year. These estimates shall be based on the adopted TDP and the Indian River County MPO's adopted Transportation Improvement Program. f. To follow all applicable FTA transit program requirements: The SRA shall adhere to all FTA in the list of Certifications and Assurances, the Master Agreement, the Federal Register, and in other FTA correspondence. Specifically, the SRA's responsibilities are: To follow all applicable procurement requirements: The SRA shall adhere to all FTA, FDOT, and County procedures in procuring all goods and services with Federal and State grant funds. In procuring rolling stock, the SRA agrees to utilize the state contract when possible. For state contract purchases, the SRA will ensure that Buy America, pre -award, post -delivery, and other applicable FTA requirements are met. The SRA shall not expend Federal or State funds on any item unless that item is included in an approved grant. The SRA shall obtain written approval from the County prior to making capital purchases in excess of $10,000. 2. To comply with all Drug and Alcohol Program Requirements: The SRA will maintain a drug-free workplace and shall administer a drug and alcohol program that complies with all applicable FTA requirements, including the provisions of 49 CFR Parts 653 and 654. This will involve conducting drug/alcohol training and testing, conducting blind performance testing, submitting an annual certificate of compliance, filing MIS forms annually, and maintaining drug test confidentiality. 3. To comply with all ADA requirements: Indian River County Public Transportation Service Agreement Pag35 The SRA will ensure that all service personnel receive periodic ADA training that incorporates the seven ADA service provisions. The SRA will provide reasonable accommodations as defined by the ADA to all transit patrons requiring special accommodations and will ensure that its facilities and vehicles are ADA accessible. The SRA will also maintain and adhere to its adopted ADA complaint procedures. 4. To solicit public comment on fare and service changes: The SRA will present any proposed fare and service changes at a public hearing prior to adoption. Comments received during the public hearing must be considered by the SRA in the implementation of fare and service changes, particularly fare increases and service reductions. 5. To collect, compile, and report National Transit Database Information: The SRA will collect, compile, and report applicable system information as required under 49 USC, Section 5335(a). This information will be reported in the format and time frame required. At least one week prior to submitting National Transit Database information, the SRA shall submit a copy of that information for the County to review. 6. To comply with all FTA Civil Rights Requirements: The SRA will maintain its Title VI program, comply with DBE requirements in hiring and procurement, and provide DBE data on time. g. To perform regular vehicle maintenance on all transit vehicles: SRA will perform all preventive maintenance as scheduled and in conformance with the Indian River County Transit Vehicle and Accessibility Feature maintenance plan. VI. Public Records Compliance A. Indian River County is a public agency subject to Chapter 119, Florida Statutes. The Contractor shall comply with Florida's Public Records Law. Specifically, the Contractor shall: (1) Keep and maintain public records required by the County to perform the service. (2) Upon request from the County's Custodian of Public Records, provide the County with a copy of the requested records or allow the records to be inspected or copied within a reasonable time at a cost that does not exceed the cost provided in Chapter 119 or as otherwise provided by law. (3) Ensure that public records that are exempt or confidential and exempt from public records disclosure requirements are not disclosed except as authorized by law for Indian River County Public Transportation Service Agreement Pag36 the duration of the contract term and following completion of the contract if the contractor does not transfer the records to the County. (4) Upon completion of the contract, transfer, at no cost, to the County all public records in possession of the Contractor or keep and maintain public records required by the County to perform the service. If the Contractor transfers all public records to the County upon completion of the contract, the Contractor shall destroy any duplicate public records that are exempt or confidential and exempt from public records disclosure requirements. If the contractor keeps and maintains public records upon completion of the contract, the Contractor shall meet all applicable requirements for retaining public records. All records stored electronically must be provided to the County, upon request from the Custodian of Public Records, in a format that is compatible with the information technology systems of the County. B. IF THE CONTRACTOR HAS QUESTIONS REGARDING THE APPLICATION OF CHAPTER 119, FLORIDA STATUTES, TO THE CONTRACTOR'S DUTY TO PROVIDE PUBLIC RECORDS RELATING TO THIS CONTRACT, CONTACT THE CUSTODIAN OF PUBLIC RECORDS AT: (772) 226-1424 publicrecords a,ircgov.com Indian River County Office of the County Attorney 180127" Street Vero Beach, FL 32960 C. Failure of the Contractor to comply with these requirements shall be a material breach of this Agreement. In witness, of the foregoing, the parties have read this Agreement and have affixed their signatures, effective on the date first appearing above: ATTEST: Approved as to Form and Legal Sufficiency for County: County Attorney INDIAN RIVER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Chairman Indian River County Public Transportation Service Agreement Pag315 ATTEST: : SENIOR RESOURCE ASSOCIATION, INC. President, Board of Directors F:\Community Development\Users\MPO\Admin\Agreements\TRANSIT\2018\New Agreement for Public Transportation Service SRA Final.doc Indian River County Public Transportation Service Agreement Pag3$ INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA MEMORANDUM TO: Jason E. Brown; County Administrator THROUGH: Stan Boling, AICP; Community Development Director Phillip J. Matson, AICP; MPO Staff Director FROM: Brian Freeman; AICP; Senior Transportation Planner DATE: June 11, 2018 SUBJECT: Request for Authorization to Submit an Application for 49 USC CH. 53, Section 5311 Transit Operating Assistance Funds for FY 2018/19 It is requested that the information herein presented be given formal consideration by the Board of County Commissioners at its regular meeting of June 19, 2018. DESCRIPTION & CONDITIONS For the past several years, the County has applied for and received transit operating assistance under 49 USC Ch. 53, Section 5311 (also known as the Formula Grants for Rural Areas program) through the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT). These grant funds have been passed through to the Senior Resource Association (SRA), Indian River County's designated transit service provider. According to federal regulations, Formula Grants for Rural Areas (Section 5311) funds may be used to provide transit service to rural or small urban areas. Such transit service includes fixed route service (GoLine Route #10) and demand -response service (Community Coach), both of which are operated by the Senior Resource Association (SRA). For FY 2018/19, $69.,776 in Section 5311 funds is allocated to the county. In this case, the grant has a 50% nonfederal match requirement for operating assistance. Matching funds will consist of $34,888 from the state Public Transportation Block Grant and $34,888 from the County's normal transit allocation. No additional local funds are necessary. While Section 5311 funds are federal grant funds, FDOT administers the Section 5311 program within the state of Florida. To apply for Section 5311 funds, the Board of County Commissioners must adopt the attached resolution (Attachment #1), authorizing staff to submit the attached grant application to FDOT. A copy of the grant application is attached to this staff report (Attachment #2). C:\Users\legistar\AppData\Local\Temp\BCL Technologies\easyPDF 8\@BCL@603CCEC3\@BCL@603CCEC3.doex 39 ANALYSIS For FY 2018/19, the SRA has requested that the County apply for federal Section 5311 funds on the SRA's behalf so that the SRA can provide for the continuation and expansion of its GoLine/Community Coach fixed route and demand response services in rural areas of Indian River County. The provision of such service is consistent with the findings of the MPO's adopted 10 -year Transit Development Plan and 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan. The County receives most ofits transit funding through the federal Section 5307 (Urban Area) grant program. Because a portion of Indian River County is designated as rural, the County is also eligible to receive transit funding through the Section 5311 (Rural Areas) grant program. As indicated in the attached grant application, the.total proposed budget amount is $139,552. Of that amount, the federal portion is $69,776. The match will consist of $34,888 in state Public Transportation Block Grant funds and $34,888 in local funds. In this case, the County's contribution consists of previously approved general fund monies budgeted specifically for this purpose. FUNDING Funding in the amount of $34,888 is budgeted and available in the General Fund / Community Transportation Coordinator account. Funding for this expenditure is part of the allocation given to the Senior Resource Association to provide transit service in the county. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners adopt the attached resolution authorizing the filing of the attached FY 2018/19 Section 5311 grant application. ATTACHMENTS 1. Authorizing Resolution for the Submission of a Section 5311 (Formula Grants for Rural Areas) application for FY 2018/19 2. Section 5311 Grant Application for FY 2018/19 3. Grant Budget Form C:\Users\legistar\AppData\Local\Temp\BCL Technologies\easyPDF 8\@BCL@603CCEC3\@BCL@603CCEC3.docx 40 RESOLUTION NO. 2018 - A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY AUTHORIZING THE SUBMISSION OF A FY 2018/19 GRANT APPLICATION FOR 49 USC CH. 53, SECTION 5311 PUBLIC TRANSIT OPERATING ASSISTANCE. WHEREAS, Indian River County has the authority to apply for and accept grants and make purchases and/or expend funds pursuant to grant awards made by the Florida Department of Transportation as authorized by Chapter 341, Florida Statutes and/or Fixing America's Surface Transportation (FAST) Act of 2015; and WHEREAS, Indian River County, as the designated recipient of federal and state public transportation funding, must be the recipient of those funds on behalf of the Indian River County — Senior Resource Association; and WHEREAS, Indian River County is eligible to receive Formula Grants for Rural Areas funding under Section 341.052(1), Florida Statutes, and under 49 USC Ch. 53, Section 531; and WHEREAS, the Florida Department of Transportation provides Formula Grants for Rural Areas funds to Indian River County to assist in the continuance and expansion of local public transportation services. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE INDIAN RIVER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS: 1. That the Community Development Director is authorized to file applications on behalf of Indian River County with the Florida Department of Transportation for public transit operating assistance as specified in the County's FY 2018/19 grant application under 49 USC Chapter 53, Section 5311. 2. That the Community Development Director is authorized to furnish such additional information as the Florida Department of Transportation may require in connection with the County's Section 5311 grant application. THIS RESOLUTION was moved for adoption by , and the motion was seconded by , and, upon being put to a vote, the vote was as follows: Chairman Peter D. O'Bryan Vice -Chairman Bob Solari Commissioner Susan Adams Commissioner Joseph E. Flescher Commissioner Tim Zorc Attachment 1 C:\Users\legistar\AppData\Local\Temp\BCLTechnologies\easyPDF8\@BCL@603CCD1C\@BCL@603CCD1C.docx Page 1 o4l RESOLUTION NO. 2013 - The Chairperson thereupon declared the resolution duly passed and adopted this 19th day of June , 2018. BOARD OF COUNTY COMNIISSIONERS INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA By: Peter D. O'Bryan, Chairman Attest: Jeffrey R. Smith, Clerk of Court and Comptroller By: Deputy Clerk I HEREBY CERTIFY that on this day, before me, an officer duly authorized in this State and County to take acknowledgments, personally appeared Peter D. O'Bryan, as Chairman of the Board of County Commissioners, and , as Deputy Clerk, to me known to be the persons described in and who executed the foregoing instrument and they acknowledged before me that they executed the same. WITNESS my hand and official seal in the County and State last aforesaid this 19th day of June , 2018. APPROVED AS TO LEGAL SUFFICIENCY mm Dylan Reingold, County Attorney Notary Public SEAL: APPROVED AS TO COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT MATTERS Stan Boling, AICP, Director Community Development Department Attachment 1 C:\Users\legistar\AppData\Local\Temp\BCLTechnologies\easyPDF 8\@BCL@603CCD I C\@BCL@603CCD I C.docx Page 2 o42 OMB Number: 4040-0004 Expiration Date: 8/31/2016 Application for Federal Assistance SF -424 ` 1. Type of Submission: F Preapplication ® Application ❑ Changed/Corrected Application ` 2. Type of Application: ` If Revision, select appropriate letter(s): ® New Continuation * Other (Specify): ❑ Revision 3. Date Received: 4. Applicant Identifier: 06/01/2018 5a. Federal Entity Identifier: 5b. Federal Award Identifier: State Use Only: 6. Date Received by State: 7. State Application Identifier: 8. APPLICANT INFORMATION: a. Legal Name: Indian River County ' b. Employer/Taxpayer Identification Number (EIN/TIN): ' c. Organizational DUNS: 0792089890000 59-6000674 d. Address: `Street1: 1801 27th Street Street2: `City: Vero Beach County/Parish: Indian River 'State: Province: 'Country: `Zip / Postal Code: 32960 FL: Florida USA: UNITED STATES e. Organizational Unit: Department Name: Division Name: Metropolitan Planning Org. Community Development Dept. f. Name and contact information of person to be contacted on matters involving this application: Prefix: ` First Name: Middle Name: Last Name: Freeman Suffix: Brian Title: Senior Planner Organizational Affiliation: * Telephone Number: 772_226-1990 Fax Number: `Email: bfreeman@ircgov.com 4. Application for Federal Assistance SF424 * 9..Type of Applicant 1: Select Applicant Type: B: County Government Type of Applicant 2: Select Applicant Type: Type of Applicant 3: Select Applicant Type: * Other (specify): * 10. Name of Federal Agency: Federal Transit Administration 11. Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number: 20-509 CFDA Title: Section 5311 * 12. Funding Opportunity Number: NA * Title: Formula Grants for Rural Areas 13. Competition Identification Number: Title: 14. Areas Affected by Project (Cities, Counties, States, etc.): Add Attachment Delete Attachment View Attachment * 15. Descriptive Title of Applicant's Project: Public Transportation Service in Rural Areas of Indian River County Attach supporting documents as specified in agency instructions. Add Attachments Delete Attachments View Attachments 44 Application for Federal Assistance SF -424 16. Congressional Districts Of: ' a. Applicant FL -8 ' b. Program/Project FL -8 Attach an additional list of Program/Project Congressional Districts if needed. Add Attachment Delete Attachment View Attachment 17. Proposed Project: ' a. Start Date: 01/01/2017 ' b. End Date: 12/31/2017 18. Estimated Funding ($): * a. Federal 69, 776.00 ' b. Applicant 0.00 ' c. State 34, 888.00 ' d. Local 34,888.001 ' e. Other 0.00 ' f. Program Income 0.00 'g. TOTAL 139,552.00 * 19. Is Application Subject to Review By State Under Executive Order 12372 Process? a. This application was made available to the State under the Executive Order 12372 Process for review on �. b. Program is subject to E.O. 12372 but has not been selected by the State for review. ® c. Program is not covered by E.O. 12372. " 20. Is the Applicant Delinquent On Any Federal Debt? (If "Yes," provide explanation in attachment.) 0 Yes ® No If "Yes", provide explanation and attach Add Attachment I Delete Attachment View Attachment 21. *By signing this application, I certify (1) to the statements contained in the list of certifications— and (2) that the statements herein are true, complete and accurate to the best of my knowledge. I also provide the required assurances— and agree to comply with any resulting terms if I accept an award. I am aware that any false, fictitious, or fraudulent statements or claims may subject me to criminal, civil, or administrative penalties. (U.S. Code, Title 218, Section 1001) ® **IAGREE ** The list of certifications and assurances, or an internet site where you may obtain this list, is contained in the announcement or agency specific instructions. Authorized Representative: Prefix: ' First Name: Stan Middle Name: ' Last Name: Boling Suffix: *Title: Community Development Director `Telephone Number: 772-226-1253 Fax Number: 'Email: sboling@ircgov.com 'Signature of Authorized Representative: ' Date Signed: 06/1 018 45 4 Form A-1 Indian River County's public transportation system consists of the GoLine fixed -route system and the Community Coach demand response system. Both GoLine and Community Coach are operated by the Senior Resource Association, the county's CTC (Community Transportation Coordinator). The GoLine system consists of 15 fixed routes and provides service throughout Indian River County, including the communities of Vero Beach, Sebastian, Gifford, Fellsmere, and Wabasso. In addition, GoLine Route 15 provides regional service to the Indian River State College Main Campus in Fort Pierce (St. Lucie County). Most GoLine routes are in service six days per week. On weekdays, GoLine routes generally operate from 6 am to 7 pm. Saturday service hours are between 8 am and 5 pm. The following table summarizes GoLine ridership by route. Route Quarter (FY 15/16) FY 15/16 Total FY 14/15 Ridership Percent Change 1 2 3 4 1 21,956 24,339 20,025 17,426 83,746 76,491 9.5% 2 50,004 54,031 40,145 43,016 187,196 192,953 -3.0% 3 23,650 22,627 20,686 28,280 95,243 93,365 2.0% 4 30,645 32,686 27,647 26,384 117,362 115,932 1.2% 5 14,430 14,990 21,493 19,578 70,491 58,892 19.7% 6 12,821 14,382 15,961 10,946 54,110 53,240 1.6% 7 12,786 13,821 13,146 12,564 52,317 54,082 -3.3% 8 31,437 31,707 27,287 31,216 121,647 112,943 7.7% 9 19,555 19,486 13,752 15,458 68,251 88,034 -22.5% 10 22,843 24,865 20,347 25,537 93,592 97,630 -4.1% 11 5,569 7,297 6,238 5,040 24,144 20,874 15.7% 12 9,920 10,371 7,278 14,629 42,198 45,052 -6.3% 13 13,694 13,970 8,671 9,113 45,448 47,563 -4.4% 14 18,563 19,772 19,182 22,629 80,146 69,599 15.2% 15 4,602 4,895 3,301 2,846 15,644 16,297 -4.0% 16 * 1,033 1,793 1,029 644 4,499 2,338 92.4% Total 293,508 311,032 266,188 285,306 1,156,034 1,145,285 0.9% * Note: Route 16 was in service for one quarter during FY 14/15. 46 Below is a map of the GoLine system: 71 .'r ft f SIM _ c 47 EXHIBIT A-1 FACTSHEET The data below is for GoLine Route #10 (fixed route), which serves the rural Fellsmere community. At the North County Transit Hub, Route #10 passengers are able to connect with three other GoLine routes, which provide service to destinations in the communities of Sebastian and Vero Beach. • Estimates are acceptable. 48 CURRENTLY IF GRANT IS AWARDED 1. Number of one-way passenger trips. 93,500 93,500 PER YEAR 2. Number of individuals served NA NA unduplicated (first ride per rider per fiscal year). PER YEAR 3. Number of vehicles used for this 1 1 service. ACTUAL 4. Number of ambulatory seats. 28 28 AVERAGE PER VEHICLE (Total ambulatory seats divided by total number of fleet vehicles 5. Number of wheelchair positions. 2 2 AVERAGE PER VEHICLE (Total wheelchair positions divided by total number of fleet vehicles 6. Vehicle Miles traveled. 84,000 84,000 PER YEAR 7. Average vehicle miles 286 (weekdays) 286 (weekdays) PER DAY 198 (Saturdays) 198 (Saturdays) 8. Normal vehicle hours in operation. 13 (weekdays) 13 (weekdays) PER DAY 9 (Saturdays) 9 (Saturdays) 9. Normal number of days in operation. 6 6 PER WEEK 10. Trip length (roundtrip). 22 miles 22 miles AVERAGE • Estimates are acceptable. 48 Exhibit B Indian River County uses funds from the Section 5311 program to provide public transportation service in rural areas within Indian River County, including the community of Fellsmere. The provided public transportation service includes fixed -route (GoLine Route 10) as well as demand response (Community Coach). GoLine is Indian River County's fixed -route public transportation system. GoLine Route 10 provides hourly service from Fellsmere to the North County Transit Hub. There are over 25 bus stop locations throughout Fellsmere along Route 10. At the North County Transit Hub, Fellsmere passengers can transfer to other routes which provide service to many destinations located in Sebastian, including Walmart, Winn-Dixie, Publix, and medical offices. In addition, passengers can also transfer to Route 9, which provides service to the Indian River Mall in Vero Beach. Route 10 is in operation six days per week. On weekdays, operating hours are from 6 am to 7 pm. On Saturdays, operating hours are from 8 am to 5 pm. Bus service is provided on all holidays, except Thanksgiving, Christmas, and New Year's Day. As with much of the GoLine system, Route 10 has experienced significant increases in ridership in recent years. During FY 2016, Route 10 provided service to 93,592 passengers. 49 GRANT NAME: 49 USC Ch. 53, Section 5311 (Formula Grants for Rural Areas) GRANT #i AR046 AMOUNT OF GRANT: $69,776 DEPARTMENT RECEIVING GRANT: Community Development (pass through to Senior Resource Association) CONTACT PERSON: Brian Freeman PHONE #:5772) 226-1990 1. How long is the grant for? One Year Starting Date: January 1, 2019 Description Position Position Position Position Position 2. Does the grant require you to fund this function after the grant is over? Yes X No 3. Does the grant require a match? X Yes No If yes, does the grant allow the match to be In Kind Services? Yes No 4. Percentage of grant to match: 50 % Retirement Contributions 5. Grant match amount required: $ 34,888 Life and Health Insurance 6. Where are the matching funds coming from (i.e. In Kind Services, Reserve for Contingency? Worker's Compensation Match consists of $34,888 in County funds already budgeted for nublic transoortation and $34,888 in FDOT grant funds 7. Does the grant cover capital costs or start-up costs? Yes X No If no, how much do you think will be needed in capital costs or start-up costs? $ (Attach a detailed listing of costs.) $ 8. Are you adding any additional positions utilizing the grant funds? Yes X No If yes, please list. (If additional space is needed, please attach a schedule.) $ Acct. Description Position Position Position Position Position 011.12 Regular Salaries 011.13 Other Salaries & Wages (PT) 012.11 Social Security 012.12 Retirement Contributions 012.13 Life and Health Insurance 012.14 Worker's Compensation 012.17 Soc. Sec. Medicare Matching Third Year TOTAL 9. What is the total cost of each position including benefits, capital, start-up, auto expense, travel, and operating? Salaries and Benefits Operating Costs Capital Total Costs 10. What is the estimated cost of the grant to the County over five years? $34,888 50 Attachment 3 Grant Amount Other Matching Costs Match Total First Year $69,776 $ $34,888 in local funds & $34,888 in FDOT grants $139,552 Second Year $ $ $ $ Third Year $ $ $ $ Fourth Year $ $ $ $ Fifth Year $ $ $ $ 50 Attachment 3 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM Assistant County Administrator / Department of General Services DATE: June 4, 2018 TO: The Honorable Board of County Commissioners THRU: Jason Brown, County Administrator Mike Zito; Assistant County Administrator William K. DeBraal, Deputy County Attorney FROM: Beth Powell, IRC Conservation Lands Manager SUBJECT: Third Renewal and Extension of a License Agreement for Security and Caretaker Occupancy of the Ryall Tract of the South Prong Preserve Conservation Area BACKGROUND: The Ryall Tract is the northern parcel of two parcels comprising the South Prong Preserve Conservation Area. The property was acquired in 2006 under the County's Environmental Lands Program, with cost- share- funding from the Florida Communities Trust. The 10.1 acre Ryall Tract is located at 7780 851 Street (CR 510) and is improved with a single-family house and a detached shed. The County renovated the house in 2012 to ready it for occupancy. In 2013, the County entered into a license agreement with an Indian River County Sheriff's Deputy (name withheld due to public records exemption) whereby the Deputy resides on the property and provides a law enforcement presence for security reasons and in exchange, the Deputy maintains the house and property, keeps approximately one acre mowed on the Ryall Tract, and controls Brazilian pepper within the overall Preserve. On August 15, 2017, the BCC approved a Second Renewal and Extension to the 2013 agreement, extending the agreement expiration date to June 18, 2018. The Deputy desires to continue under the License Agreement by extending it one year from the date of expiration of the second Renewal and Extension of License Agreement. Some modifications have been made to the License Agreement to include an annual County inspection of the property, tenant's responsibility for minor repairs, required quarterly herbicide logs by the tenant and County inspections of the overall Preserve for the treatment of Brazilian pepper. FUNDING: There is no direct funding impacted by this Third Renewal and Extension of License Agreement. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board authorize the Chairman to sign the attached Third Renewal and Extension of License Agreement between Indian River County and the Deputy to provide for the extension of the Agreement until June 2019. C:\Users\legistar\AppData\Local\Temp\BCL Technologies\easyPDF 8\@BCL6882000DD\@BCL@882000DD.docx 51 THIRD RENEWAL AND EXTENSION OF LICENSE AGREEMENT This Third Renewal and Extension of License Agreement is entered into this 19th day of June, 2018, by and between Indian River County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida (County or Licensor) whose address is 180127th Street, Vero Beach, FL 32960 and a resident of Indian River County, (Licensee) whose address is , Vero Beach, FL 32967 and agree as follows: WHEREAS, the County is the owner of two tracts of land known as the Ryall Tract and the Shadowbrook Tract, comprising the South Prong Preserve Conservation Area, depicted on Exhibit A attached and incorporated by reference; and WHEREAS, in 2012 and 2013, the County refurbished a single family residence on the Ryall Tract on the north side of County Road 510; and WHEREAS, County and Licensee entered into a License Agreement on June 18, 2013, renewed on November 18, 2014 and August 8, 2017, whereby Licensee would perform certain duties in exchange for residing in the single family residence and detached shed located on the property; and WHEREAS, the License Agreement and subsequent renewals have a term of one year subject to renewal for an additional one year term; and WHEREAS, the ,parties are mutually satisfied with the terms of the License Agreement and hereby agree to renew and extend the license agreement again. NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, the parties agree as follows: 1. The recitals are true and correct and are adopted by reference herein. 2. The License Agreement dated June 18, 2013, as amended by Renewals and Extensions dated November 18, 2014, and August 8, 2017, is hereby renewed and extend until June 18, 2019. 3. County, at its own expense, shall provide an herbicide effective at controlling Brazilian pepper trees to Licensee, and Licensee or his contractor shall use the herbicide following label directions, to eliminate 80% of the Brazilian pepper present on both the Ryall Tract and Shadowbrook Tract. Quarterly reports shall be provided to the Conservation Lands Manager and an annual inspection shall be conducted to determine effectiveness. 4. The County shall annually inspect the condition and maintenance of the Ryall Tract house and report any deficiencies or actions necessary for correction to the Licensee. Failure to correct or remedy deficiencies within ten (10) days of notice shall constitute a breach of this agreement. 52 5. The Licensee shall fund and repair, at his own expense, all minor repairs to the house including all appliances, septic maintenance, minor interior and exterior repairs, up to $2,500 per occurrence. A list of all repairs shall be provided to the County annually. 6. The Licensee is responsible for protecting the home during Hurricane events, including, but not limited to boarding doors and windows to prevent wind damage, removing all exterior items that may become hazardous during high winds and any other normal precautions recommended by the Indian River County Emergency Services Department. htti)://www.irces.com/EM/documents/Disaster-Preparedness.pdf 7. Licensee shall continue to provide security to the Ryall and Shadowbrook Tracts and coordinate with the Conservation Lands Manager on any issues related to site security. 8. The remaining terms and conditions of the License Agreement not modified herein shall remain unchanged. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Third Renewal and Extension of License Agreement as of the day and year first written above. Attest: Jeffrey R. Smith, Clerk of Court and Comptroller M Deputy Clerk Witness Witness Approved as to form and legal sufficiency M William K. DeBraal Deputy County Attorney BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA By: Peter D. O'Bryan, Chairman Approved by BCC: June 19, 2018 0 Approved: By: Jason E. Brown County Administrator 53 V6. • � �rii'f'�r,�Y Yt ,>i �r ^� >'�x'� 1 v ' ;. j •r ssy�^=1l' its44 `. r � r l �t z i # s r� -- � ' it'., r 'T G a c��.,r ♦;•�. � • � �.` • .:r �_ "�'2` ''dee . '� ,� -•. +„ ^ � ' � C+ .y i. S ' �t 1►L, '/, „•.: I •�', ' yit .• 9 f1`. ti `l �,,L� • - `ti-cf'� .g.:..�' t •».^IY •_�/,7 `�.p2{� 3 a. 1'�.� '� b 1� ��.�_t c3;"•. tiffs v �� t if � ts'�ati / ' / � ^ii� � ";• C �� "��"�� F" ;yvt r`:. � '��. i y � CSG !�`•».. 7 4. J`�I'''3aly�f[ '}�{ �t �' 't Ix f�+- ��"� '� UJ � [ l � to �.4 -♦ r y. �k=:'L, .C.,_ �,�Iys I {Y /� tl.] 1� �`. ,� ..t r. il .1'1t '¢Aa. r a7 1� i•. ' '�,5'�•1e. fry ih f� ' � V µ�'€, ' ,- n� p VV+3�' � � � {T ` _ �� ��•�� "'Ss � U � „ r`,�� �� `�3 � ^ �.f�.�.rar �.� r A' .. t i .F i� .J T f. M1' � y 7 {!;4' : »�, � i ��. •1 �;, C� .rr"'�I t. yi f � ,,� „w,. „- 3 `••r Y � IWO 0�'Y+ ; o� 4 � 4 c r.�.., `yr r` a •,� �' c ) 4 . ��[I .4�v � -M. 1 �'� c.qq� l F , i'y ,,•"i 'i V ;' ,'l 1 , i �`•. F`-. 'N t,. ✓fir - { U ..f 7 I �p�f3 Yr . ,4 v y. 17 �'c Y.jT•-�.. 'Y 0 i"? ��F, tv. 'F"�•� 85TH ST (COUNTY.ROAD 510) 510 a,•_ Jv L� �L1'U� N`� � � a ;I'.� %ice''', �th�.,t �}x i1i`� ,Gl�.�?���4 `' =` N, ��, "•= r Ilk, V r �..yt. :'r�� ,'-I r,l :.��- ��� "�. �5.Y,51� � � _`•1 ,v�'ia{r?. } y" ♦— R.. 3 "SSNNN .lam. r / 1 LF.'. Vj ��•s � .'� �, ; cV", &3RDST .. s it . 4,.a rt K�.r'� �,y .c .s.i•cri�+t �VERCOG ® Lawn Maintenance for q tRyallTract Ryall and Shadowbrook Tracts Shadowraa � • a Maintaineedd LLaa wn 'iOR1D rFeet f Parcel Boundaries 0 100 200 100 600 800 1.000 — -Duh min C Paton Pr—am Pr Pii—to il m 4 lla.� IrIFIM"1 ✓ / — INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD MEMORANDUM TO: Jason E. Brown County Administrator THROUGH: Richard B. Szpyrka, P.E. Public Works Director FROM: James D. Gray, Jr. Natural Resources Manager SUBJECT: Work Order No. 7 - Morgan & Eklund, Inc. 2018 Beach Profile Monitoring Surveys (SUMMER) DATE: June 4, 2018 DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS On October 4, 2016, the Board approved a contract with Morgan and Eklund, Inc. (M&E) for Professional Land Surveying and Mapping Services for a two-year term. The Board amended the Contract on October 18, 2016. M&E is the selected County Consultant for professional onshore/offshore hydrographic surveying services. The County's Beach Preservation Plan recommends semiannual beach profile surveys in order to monitor the seasonal, summer and winter, fluctuations of the beach. The proposed Work Order No. 7 provides summer -time countywide hydrographic surveying (beach profile) services for the Sector 3 and Sector 7 Beach Restoration Projects and additional surveying to complete a 2018 countywide (22.4 miles) monitoring program. Additionally, the summer 2018 beach profile surveys will provide a base line beach condition in the event of an active Hurricane season. All onshore and offshore beach profile surveys are conducted along The Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) Range Monuments at approximately 1,000 foot intervals (alongshore) and extend from the vegetated dune seaward to a location approximately -40 feet offshore (cross -shore). For project tracking purposes, Work Order No. 7 is divided into three (3) separate tasks. Task 1: Summer 2018 Sector 3 Beach and Dune Restoration Proiect Post Construction Monitorine Survey (R -15-R-60) By Permit, annual Post Construction hydrographic surveying is required to assess the performance of the Sector 3 Beach and Dune Project area. Task 1 includes all surveying (7.5 miles) required to complete the 2018 physical monitoring of the Sector 3 Beach and Dune Project area. Task 1 totals a lump sum amount of $25,300. C:\Users\legistar\AppData\Local\Temp\BCL Technologies\easyPDF 54 8\@BCL@CC38EAC3\@BCL@CC3 8EAC3.docx Page 2 BCC Agenda Item June 19, 2018 Task 2: Summer 2018 Sector 7 Post Construction Monitoring (R -97-R-108) In the spring of 2007, the County completed construction of the Sector 7 Beach Restoration Project. The County has completed all Permit required post construction monitoring for the Sector 7 Project. However, hydrographic surveys of the project area have continued semiannually to determine the long term performance of the project. Task 2 includes all surveying (2 miles) required to continue the annual monitoring of the Sector 7 Beach Nourishment Project. Task 2 totals a lump sum amount of $6,600. Task 3: Summer 2018 Countywide Beach Monitoring (R-61— R-96 and R -109-R-119) For the shoreline outside of the Sector 3 and Sector 7 beach projects, countywide beach profile surveys are necessary to identify areas of chronic beach erosion and determine if infrastructure may be vulnerable to storm damage. The beach profile surveys will then be used to determine appropriate projects to mitigate erosion as identified in the County Beach Preservation Plan, including the upcoming Sector 5 Beach Restoration Project. Task 3 includes the remaining countywide (9 miles) beach profile surveys. Task 3 totals a lump sum amount of $25,850. Please note: The Sebastian Inlet District (District), as part of their Inlet Management Plan, conducts semiannual beach profile surveys along the northern 5.6 miles of the County. The District continues to partner with the County and has agreed to provide their certified 2018 beach profile survey data (winter and summer) to the County, resulting in a complete 22.4 mile countywide (semiannual) beach profile survey and a combined annual savings of approximately $30,000 to the County. The aggregate of Tasks 1-3 under Work Order No. 7 totals a lump sum amount of $57,750. FUNDING Local funding of Beach Restoration includes a portion of Local Option Tourist Tax Revenue as well as allocation of the One Cent Sales Tax. Funding for Work Order No. 7 will be provided from three (3) separate accounts. Task 1: Summer 2018 Sector 3 Beach and Dune Restoration Proiect Post Construction Monitoring Survey(R-15-R-60) Funding for Task 1 is budgeted and available for monitoring of the Sector 3 Beach Restoration Project in the Beach Restoration Fund, Sector 3 Beach Post Construction Monitoring Account No. 12814472-033490-05054. Task 1 totals a lump sum amount of $25,300. Task 2: Summer 2018 Sector 7 Post Construction Monitoring (R -97-R-108) Funding for Task 2 is budgeted and available for monitoring of the Sector 7 Beach Restoration Project in the Beach Restoration Fund, Sector 7 Beach Preservation Monitoring Account No. 12814472-033490-05079. Task 2 totals a lump sum amount of $6,600. C:\Users\legistar\AppData\Local\Temp\BCL Technologies\easyPDF 55 8\@BCL@CC3 8EAC3\@BCL@CC3 8EAC3.docx Page 2 BCC Agenda Item June 19, 2018 Task 3: Summer 2018 Countywide Beach Monitorinp, (R-61— R-96 and R -109-R-119) Funding for Task 3 is budgeted and available for countywide beach surveys in the Beach Restoration Fund, Other Professional Services Account No. 12814472-033190-01024. Task 3 totals a lump sum amount of $25,850. RECOMMENDATION The recommendation of staff is for the Board to approve Work Order No. 7 to the Professional Land Surveying and Mapping Services contract with Morgan and Eklund, Inc. and authorize the Chairman to sign on behalf of the County. ATTACHMENT Morgan and Eklund, Inc. Work Order No. 7 APPROVED AGENDA ITEM FOR: JUNE 19, 2018 C:\Users\legistar\AppData\Local\Temp\BCL Technologies\easyPDF 56 8\@BCL@CC3 8EAC3\@BCL@CC3 8EAC3.docx Board of County Commissioners Administration - Building A 180127th Street Vero Beach, Florida 32960 Telephone: (772) 567-8000 FAX: 772-778-9391 Project: 2018 Beach Profile Monitoring Surveys (Summer) WORK ORDER NO. 7 (Hydrographic Surveying) FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT ANNUAL SURVEYING and MAPPING/GIS SERVICES WITH MORGAN AND EKLUND, INC In accordance with Contract No. 1605 2016-2018 This Work Order No. 7 is in accordance with the existing AGREEMENT dated October 4, 2016 and as amended October 18, 2016, between Morgan and Eklund, Inc., (SURVEYOR) and Indian River County (COUNTY); This Work Order No. 7 amends the agreement as follows: SECTION I — PROJECT LIMITS This Work Order No. 7 is for the SURVEYOR to perform all related field and office Surveying and Mapping services in connection with the 2018 Beach Profile Monitoring Surveys (Summer); Florida Department of Environmental Protection Reference Monuments R-15 — R-119. SECTION II - SCOPE OF SERVICES As agreed upon between SURVEYOR and COUNTY, the SURVEYOR shall provide Professional Land Surveying services to complete all tasks as outlined in this Work Order No. 7; specifically detailed in the attached proposal Exhibit A. SECTION III — TIME FOR COMPLETION & DE LIVERABLES/WORK PRODUCT 1. Project shall be completed as follows: a. 100% "Paper" review submittal (final review prior to request for final deliverables) shall be made within 90 calendar days of receipt of Notice to Proceed for review by County Staff prior to preparing the final submittal package. b. Time of FINAL project completion shall be within 10 calendar days of receipt of the County's review comments from the 100% "Paper Submittal". 57 F:\Public Works\Personal Folders - Active\James6\Countywide Survey\2018\Summer 2018\2018 Beach Profile Monitoring Surveys SUMMER -- Morgan and Eklund WO No.7 signature page.docx IRC Work Order No.7 Morgan and Eklund, Inc 2018 Beach Profile Monitoring Surveys (Summer) June 19, 2018 Page 2 of 3 2. Deliverables -The SURVEYOR shall provide the COUNTY: a. 100% Phase Submittal for COUNTY review and comment. All submittals shall include one (1) paper "hardcopy" along with AutoCad Files and an ASCII file for all survey points. COUNTY shall strive to provide review comments within 10 calendar days of the preliminary submittal. b. FINAL Deliverables, one (1) paper "hardcopy" signed and sealed sets. Sheeted and model space (as applicable) AutoCad drawing file in release 2009 through Civil 3D 2013, PDF formats and an ASCII file for all survey points, all electronic files to be on CD. c. Survey set/sheets shall include a cover sheet with location sketch, survey certifications, related title and project number, survey notes, legend and abbreviations and plan view sheets. d. Work Product and digital versions are to be prepared and submitted so that the COUNTY or other consultants can readily use it for the design and analysis of the area, as defined. It shall contain all information necessary for third -party surveyor to independently recreate and/or utilize the survey work. It is acknowledged all final products become property of Indian River COUNTY and will be available for use by the public at large. e. The SURVEYOR'S work product shall meet or exceed the minimum standards as defined by Sections Il, III and IV or the COUNTY will not approve the SURVEYOR'S request for payment. SECTION IV — COMPENSATION The COUNTY agrees to pay, and the SURVEYOR agrees to accept, for the above described services rendered as identified in Sections I, II, and III of this Work Order No. 7, for a total lump sum fee of $57,500. All and/or any additional services not described hereon shall be pre -approved by the COUNTY. Approved additional services shall be invoiced at the rates disclosed in the approved fee schedule with the SURVEYOR for the contract year(s) of October 1, 2016 through September 30, 2018. All invoicing shall include Work Order No. 7 (WO 7), Contract Number (1605). Payments shall be in accordance with the original Professional Surveying and Mapping Services Agreement, Contract No: 1605 with the COUNTY and as stated in Section II, III and IV hereon. ,dj F:\Public Works\Personal Folders - Active\JamesG\Countywide Survey\2018\Summer 2018\2018 Beach Profile Monitoring Surveys SUMMER -- Morgan and Eklund WO No.7 signature na2e.docx IRC Work Order No.7 Morgan and Eklund, Inc 2018 Beach Profile Monitoring Surveys (Summer) June 19, 2018 Page 3 of 3 The AGREEMENT is hereby amended as specifically set forth herein. All remaining sections of the AGREEMENT shall remain in full force and effect, and are incorporated herein. IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties hereto have executed these presents this day of 2018. OWNER BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA (Signature) Peter D. O'Bryan, Chairman Approved by BCC Morgan and Eklund, Inc. ATTEST: Jeffrey R. Smith, Clerk of Court and Comptroller (Seal) Deputy Clerk Approved: Jason E, Brown, COUNTY Administrator Approved as to Form and Legal Sufficiency: William K. DeBraal, Deputy COUNTY Attorney John K. Morgan, President (Printed name and title) Witnessed by: .._ 59 F:\Public Works\Personal Folders - Active\JamesG\Countywide Survey\2018\Summer 2018\2018 Beach Profile Monitoring Surveys SUMMER -- Morgan and Eklund WO No. 7 signature i)age.docx EXHIBIT A Morgan & Eklund, Inc. B745 U.S. Highway 1 P.O. Box 701420 Wabasso, Florida 32570 May 31, 2018 Indian River County Attn: Mr. James Gray, Jr. Coastal Engineer 180127 lh Street, Building A Vero Beach, FL 32960 Phone: 772-3BS-5364 Fax: 772-3ee-31 65 RE: Summer 2018 Indian River County Coastal Monitoring Survey; Onshore/Offshore Profiles along FDEP Range Lines R-15 to R-119 (105 Lines) Dear James: Morgan & Eklund, Inc.. is pleased to provide you with the following proposal to furnish professional land and hydrographic survey services for the above referenced project. Beach profiles will include R-15 through R-119, a total of 105 (one hundred five) beach profile lines. All data collected will be in accordance with the FDEP-approved Physical Monitoring Plan. Morgan & Eklund, Inc. will provide the County with beach profile data in ASCII file format together with AutoCAD drawings signed by the surveyor. The survey will be performed in July 2018 with drawings and reports completed in August 2018. Additionally, the landward occurrence of rock outcroppings will be identified along each profile line. In accordance with the scope of work as provided, I estimate our costs to be as follows: I. Summer 2018 Sector 3 Beach and Dune Restoration Project Post Construction Monitoring Survey (R-15 to R-60) 46 Onshore/offshore profile lines @ $550/line......................................$ 25,300.00 II. Summer 2018 Sector 7 Post Construction Monitoring (R-97 to R-108) 12 Onshore/Offshore profile lines @ $550/line.....................................$ 6,600.00 60 III. Summer 2018 Countywide Beach Monitoring (R-61 to R-96 and R-109 to R-119) 47 onshore/offshore profile lines @ $550/line......................................$ 25,850.00 Total Cost I -III ...................................................$ 57,750.00 As always, Morgan & Eklund, Inc. is looking forward to working with you and Indian River County on this project. Sincerely } Jo Morgan, II, PL President JRM:dmc Indian River County 2 513112018 8",G INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD MEMORANDUM TO: Jason E. Brown County Administrator THROUGH: Richard B. Szpyrka, P.E. Public Works Director FROM: James D. Gray, Jr. Natural Resources Manager SUBJECT: Amendment No. 1- FDEP Grant Agreement No. 171R2 Wabasso Beach Restoration Project (Sector 3) DATE: June 4, 2018 BACKGROUND The Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) received FY 2016/2017 funding to assist eligible governmental entities for beach erosion control activities under the Florida Beach Management Funding Assistance Program. On February 26, 2018, FDEP entered into grant Agreement No. 171112 with Indian River County; committing up to $250,000, at a cost share ratio of 50% State - 50% Local, for permit -required 2018 post construction monitoring of the Sector 3 Beach and Dune Restoration Project. On November 22, 2013, FDEP entered into grant Agreement No. 141112 with Indian River County; committing up to $5,400,000, at a cost share ratio of 50% State - 50% Local, for emergency nourishment to repair damages sustained to the Sector 3 Project area as a result of Hurricane Sandy (2012). To date, all work under grant Agreement No. 141112 is now complete. However, $321,551.30 in State funding remains unused under the grant. DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS To avoid the funds from going stale, staff requested FDEP's consideration to move the remaining funds of $321,551.30 from the 141112 grant agreement to the recently approved 171112 grant agreement and revise the grant work plan to allow the funds to be used for repairs to the Sector 3 project area damaged by Hurricanes Matthew (2016) and Irma (2017). FDEP has agreed to staff's request. The purpose of this agenda item is to request Board approval of Amendment 1 to FDEP grant 171112. C:\Users\legistar\AppData\Local\Temp\BCL Technologies\easyPDF 8\@BCL@CC389B07\@BCL@CC389B07.docx 62 Page 2 BCC Agenda Item FDEP Grant Agreement 171112—Amendment No. 1 June 19, 2018 Amendment No. 1 to FDEP grant Agreement No. 171112 effectuates the following: • Transfers the remaining $321,551.30 in funding from 141112 grant agreement into 171112 grant agreement, • Adds Task 2: Design to the grant work plan, and • Increases the total eligible grant project costs from $250,000 to $893,102.60; at a cost share ratio of $50% State — 50% Local. 111P01POINl Local funding of Beach Restoration includes a portion of Local Option Tourist Tax Revenue as well as allocation of the One Cent Sales Tax. Funding for the 2018 Post Construction Monitoring is budgeted and available from Sector 3 Post Construction Monitoring Account No. 12814472- 033490-05054. Funding for Sector 3 design and permitting is budgeted and available from Other Professional Services — Hurricane Matthew — Sector 3 Account No. 12814472-066514-17001. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends the Board approve Amendment No. 1 to FDEP Grant Agreement No. 171112 and authorize the Chairman to sign on behalf of the County. Following Board approval, the County will transmit the partially executed Amendment No. 1 to the State for final signatures. Upon receipt of the fully executed original from the State, staff will transmit to the Clerk to the Board of County Commission for recording. ATTACHMENT 1. Amendment No. 1 to FDEP Grant Agreement 171R2 2. Change Order No. 1 to Indian River County Grant Form No. 171112 APPROVED AGENDA ITEM FOR: JUNE 19, 2018 C:\Users\legistar\AppData\Local\Temp\BCL Technologies\easyPDF 8\@BCL@CC389B07\@BCL@CC389B07.docx 63 DEP AGREEMENT NO. 17IR2 WABASSO (INDIAN RIVER SECTOR 3) BEACH RESTORATION AMENDMENT NO. 1 THIS AGREEMENT as entered into on February 26, 2018, between the FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION (hereinafter referred to as the "Department') and Indian River County (hereinafter referred to as the "Grantee") is hereby amended. WHEREAS, the LOCAL SPONSOR has requested to use remaining funds of $321,551.30 from 14IR2 — Indian River County Hurricane Repair agreement to complete the scopes of work in 17IR2 Wabasso (Indian River Sector 3) Beach Restoration and has requested to revise the Grant Work Plan and the DEPARTMENT has agreed. NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereto agree as follows: Attachment 3, Grant Work Plan, is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced with Attachment 3-A, Revised Grant Work Plan, as attached to this Amendment and hereby incorporated into the Agreement. All references in the Agreement to Attachment 3 shall hereinafter refer to Attachment 3-A, Revised Grant Work Plan. Attachment 5, Special Audit Requirements, is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced with Attachment 5-A, Revised Special Audit Requirements, attached hereto and made a part of the Agreement. All references in the Agreement to Attachment 5, shall hereinafter refer to Attachment 5-A, Revised Special Audit Requirements. The parties agree to the terms and conditions of this Amendment and have duly authorized their respective representatives to sign it on the dates indicated below. REMAINDER PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK 64 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this amendment to Agreement 17IR2 to be duly executed, the day and year last written below. INDIAN RIVER COUNTY STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION By: By: *Title of Person Authorized to Sign Secretary or designee Print Name of Authorized Person Print Name and Title of Authorized Person Date: Date: Catherine Florko, DEP Grant Manager Dena VanLandingham, DEP QC Reviewer FEID No.: 59-6000674 List of attachments/exhibits included as part of this Amendment: Letter/ Specify Type Number Description (include number of pages) Attachment 3-A Revised Grant Work Plan (3 Pages) Attachment 5-A Special Audit Requirements 65 ATTACHMENT 3-A GRANT WORK PLAN PROJECT TITLE: Wabasso (Indian River Sector 3) Beach Restoration PROJECT LOCATION: The Project is located between Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) reference monuments R20 and R51.3 along the Atlantic Ocean in Indian River County. PROJECT BACKGROUND: The Wabasso (Indian River Sector 3) Beach Restoration project consists of restoration of approximately 6.1 miles of shoreline between DEP Monuments R20 - R51.3 (critically eroded section) in Indian River County (Sector 3). As authorized under JCP Permit No. 0285993, Phase I construction was completed in 2010, Phase II construction was initiated in 2011 and completed in 2012. Due to damages sustained during Hurricane Sandy minor emergency repairs were constructed in 2012 and a full storm repair project was constructed in the winter of 2014 — 2015. Sector 3 was impacted from Hurricanes Mattahew (2016) and Irma (2017) necessitating additional design and permitting for the repair of the entire project area. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The project consists of permit required monitoring and design. PROJECT ELIGIBILITY: The Department has determined that 100 percent of the non-federal Project cost is eligible for state cost sharing. Therefore, the Department's financial obligation shall not exceed the sum of $446,551.30 for this Project or up to 50 percent of the non-federal Project cost, if applicable, for the specific eligible Project items listed, whichever is less. Any indicated federal cost sharing percentage is an estimate and shall not affect the cost sharing percentages of the non-federal share. The parties agree that eligibility for cost sharing purposes will be maintained pursuant to 6213-36, F.A.C. The Grantee will be responsible for auditing all travel reimbursement expenses based on the travel limits established in Section 112.061, Florida Statutes (F.S.). Pursuant to Sections 161.091 - 161.161, F.S, the Department provides financial assistance to eligible governmental entities for beach erosion control and inlet management activities under the Florida Beach Management Funding Assistance Program; and Pursuant to 62B -36.005(1)(d), Florida Administrative Code (F.A.C.), the Grantee has resolved to support and serve as local sponsor, has demonstrated a financial commitment, and has demonstrated the ability to perform the tasks associated with the beach erosion control project as described herein. The Project shall be conducted in accordance with the terms and conditions set forth under this Agreement, all applicable Department permits and the eligible Project task items established below. All data collection and processing, and the resulting product deliverables, shall comply with the standards and technical specifications contained in the Department's Monitoring Standards for Beach Erosion Control Projects (2014) and all associated state and federal permits, unless otherwise specified in the approved Scope of Work for an eligible Project item. The monitoring standards may be found at: http://www.dep. state.fl.uslbeacheslpublications/pdf/PhysicalMonitoringStandards.pdf. One (1) electronic copy of all written reports developed under this Agreement shall be forwarded to the Department, unless otherwise specified. 66 Acronyms: DEP or FDEP — Florida Department of Environmental Protection F.A.C. — Florida Administrative Code F.S. — Florida Statutes FWC — Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission JCP — Joint Coastal Permit TASKS and DELIVERABLES: For all tasks identified below, the Local Sponsor will provide detailed scopes of work or a letter requesting advance payment, which shall include a narrative description of work to be completed, a corresponding cost estimate and a proposed schedule of completion for the proposed work and associated deliverables. Each scope of work shall be approved in writing by the DEP Project Manager to be included into this work plan for reimbursement. Task 1: Monitoring State and federal monitoring required by permit is eligible for reimbursement pursuant to program statute and rule. In order to comply with Florida Auditor General report 2014-064 regarding conflicts of interest and to be consistent with Section 287.057(17)(a)(1), F.S., all monitoring data and statistical analysis must be provided directly and concurrently from the monitoring contractor to the Department/Local Sponsor permittee/engineering consultant. The Local Sponsor's engineering consultant must provide an adequate mitigation plan, consistent with section. 287.057(17)(a)(1), F.S., including a description of organizational, physical, and electronic barriers to be used by the Local Sponsor's engineering consultant, that addresses conflicts of interest when contracting multi -disciplinary firms for Project engineering and post -construction environmental monitoring services, or when the Project engineering consultant firm subcontracts for post - construction environmental monitoring. Environmental monitoring includes hardbottom, seagrass, and mangrove resources. Department approval of the consultant's mitigation plan will be required prior to execution 'of this Agreement. If at any time the Local Sponsor and/or its engineering consultant fails to comply with this provision, the Local Sponsor agrees to reimburse the Department all funds provided by the'Department associated with environmental monitoring for the Project listed. Task Description: This task includes activities associated with permit -required monitoring conducted in accordance with the conditions specified by state or federal regulatory agencies. All monitoring tasks must be located within or adjacent to the Project area and follow the Department's Regional Coastal Monitoring Program and FWC's marine turtle and shorebird monitoring programs. Guidance for monitoring of nearshore resources is available in the Department's Standard Operation Procedures For Nearshore Hardbottom Monitoring Of Beach Nourishment Projects. The Local Sponsor must submit work products directly to the appropriate state or federal regulatory agencies in accordance with permit conditions to be eligible for reimbursement under this task, unless otherwise directed. Deliverable: For each interim or final payment, the Local Sponsor will provide a Task Summary Report containing; 1) An itemized listing of all monitoring activities completed or in progress during the payment request period and, 2) Documentation of submittal to state and federal regulatory agencies of completed monitoring data, surveys and final reports for permit -required work under this task description. Performance Standard: The DEP Project Manager will review the task deliverable and any associated work products as necessary to verify they meet the specifications in the Grant Work Plan and this task description. 67 Payment Request Schedule: Payment requests may be submitted after the deliverable is received and accepted and may be submitted no more frequently than quarterly. Task 2: Design Task Description: The Local Sponsor will acquire professional services for the engineering and design of the Project such as coastal engineering analyses, preparation of plans and specifications, physical and environmental surveys, cultural resource surveys, design -level geotechnical services, sediment studies, inlet studies, environmental analyses, orthophotography, plan formulations and for obtaining environmental permits and other Project -related authorizations. The Local Sponsor will submit work products to the appropriate State or Federal regulatory agencies as requested by the DEP Project Manager in order to be eligible for reimbursement under this task. Deliverable: Certification of Completion including documentation of submittal affirming that the final design document was completed and submitted to the Department. For interim payment requests, a Task Summary Report signed by the Local Sponsor must be submitted detailing work progress during the payment request period. The Task Summary Report must include the dates and descriptions of all activities, surveys and reports completed or in progress during the time period of the interim payment request. Performance Standard: The DEP Project Manager will review the task deliverable and any associated work products as necessary to verify they meet the specifications in the Grant Work Plan and this task description. Payment Request Schedule: Payment requests may be submitted after the deliverable is received and accepted and may be submitted no more frequently than quarterly. Estimated Eligible Project Cost State Task Title Budget Category Task # Eligible Project Tasks Cost DEP Local Total Share 1 Monitoring Contractual Services $125,000.00 1/1/18 1 Monitoring 50.00% 1 $125,000.001 $125,000.001 $250,000.00 2 Design 50.00% $321,551.301 $321,551.30 $643,102.60 COSTS 1 $446,551.301 $446,551.301 $893,102.60 PROJECT TIMELINE & BUDGET DETAIL: The tasks must be completed by, and all deliverables received by, the corresponding task end date. Task No. Task Title Budget Category Budget Amount Task Start Date Task End Date Deliverable Due Date 1 Monitoring Contractual Services $125,000.00 1/1/18 1/31/21 1/31/21 2 Design Contractual Services $321,551.30 1/1/18 1/31/21 1/31/21 Total: $446,551.30 68 ATTACHMENT 5 SPECIAL AUDIT REQUIREMENTS The administration of resources awarded by the Department of Environmental Protection (which may be referred to as the "Department", 'DEP", "FDEP" or "Grantor" or other name in the contract/agreement) to the recipient (which may be referred to as the "Contractor", Grantee" or other name in the contract/agreement) may be subject to audits and/or monitoring by the Department of Environmental Protection, as described in this attachment. MONITORING In addition to reviews of audits conducted in accordance with OMB Circular A-133, as revised, 2 CFR Part 200, Subpart F, and Section 215.97, F.S., as revised (see "AUDITS" below), monitoring procedures may include, but not be limited to, on-site visits by Department staff, limited scope audits as defined by OMB Circular A-133, as revised, and 2 CFR Part 200, Subpart F, and/or other procedures. By entering into this Agreement, the recipient agrees to comply and cooperate with any monitoring procedures/processes deemed appropriate by the Department of Environmental Protection. In the event the Department of Environmental Protection determines that a limited scope audit of the recipient is appropriate, the recipient agrees to comply with any additional instructions provided by the Department to the recipient regarding such audit. The recipient further agrees to comply and cooperate with any inspections, reviews, investigations, or audits deemed necessary by the Chief Financial Officer or Auditor General. R1J1IL11: PART I: FEDERALLY FUNDED This part is applicable if the recipient is a State or local government or a non-profit organization as defined in OMB Circular A-133, as revised (for fiscal year start dates prior to December 26, 2014), or as defined in 2 CFR §200.330 (for fiscal year start dates after December 26, 2014). In the event that the recipient expends $500,000 ($750,000 for fiscal year start dates after December 26, 2014) or more in Federal awards in its fiscal year, the recipient must have a single or program -specific audit conducted in accordance with the provisions of OMB Circular A-133, as revised, and 2 CFR Part 200, Subpart F. EXHIBIT 1 to this Attachment indicates Federal funds awarded through the Department of Environmental Protection by this Agreement. In determining the Federal awards expended in its fiscal year, the recipient shall consider all sources of Federal awards, including Federal resources received from the Department of Environmental Protection. The determination of amounts of Federal awards expended should be in accordance with the guidelines established by OMB Circular A-133, as revised, and 2 CFR Part 200, Subpart F. An audit of the recipient conducted by the Auditor General in accordance with the provisions of OMB Circular A-133, as revised, and 2 CFR Part 200, Subpart F, will meet the requirements of this part. 2. In connection with the audit requirements addressed in Part I, paragraph 1, the recipient shall fulfill the requirements relative to auditee responsibilities as provided in Subpart C of OMB Circular A-133, as revised, and 2 CFR Part 200, Subpart F. 3. If the recipient expends less than $500,000 (or $750,000, as applicable) in Federal awards in its fiscal year, an audit conducted in accordance with the provisions of OMB Circular A-133, as revised, and 2 CFR Part 200, Subpart F, is not required. In the event that the recipient expends less than $500,000 (or $750,000, as applicable) in Federal awards in its fiscal year and elects to have an audit conducted in accordance with the provisions of OMB Circular A-133, as revised, and 2 CFR Part 200, Subpart F the cost of the audit must be paid from non -Federal resources (i.e., the cost of such an audit must be paid from recipient resources obtained from other than Federal entities). The recipient may access information regarding the Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance (CFDA) via the intemet at www.efda.gov 69 PART II: STATE FUNDED This part is applicable if the recipient is a nonstate entity as defined by Section 215.97(2)(n), Florida Statutes. In the event that the recipient expends a total amount of state financial assistance equal to or in excess of $750,000 in any fiscal year of such recipient, the recipient must have a State single or project -specific audit for such fiscal year in accordance with Section 215.97, Florida Statutes; applicable rules of the Department of Financial Services; and Chapters 10.550 (local governmental entities) or 10.650 (nonprofit and for-profit organizations), .Rules of the Auditor General. EXHIBIT 1 to this Attachment indicates state financial assistance awarded through the Department of Environmental Protection by this Agreement. In determining the state financial assistance expended in its fiscal year, the recipient shall consider all sources of state financial assistance, including state financial assistance received from the Department of Environmental Protection, other state agencies, and other nonstate entities. State financial assistance does not include Federal direct or pass-through awards and resources received by a nonstate entity for Federal program matching requirements. In connection with the audit requirements addressed in Part II, paragraph 1; the recipient shall ensure that the audit complies with the requirements of Section 215.97(7), Florida Statutes. This includes submission of a financial reporting package as defined by Section 215.97(2), Florida Statutes, and Chapters 10.550 (local governmental entities) or 10.650 (nonprofit and for-profit organizations), Rules of the Auditor General. If the recipient expends less than $750,000. in state financial assistance in its fiscal year, an audit conducted in accordance with the provisions of Section 215.97, Florida Statutes, is not required. In the event that the recipient expends less than $750,000 in state financial assistance in its fiscal year, and elects to have an audit conducted in accordance with the provisions of Section 215.97, Florida Statutes, the cost of the audit must be paid from the non -state entity's resources (i.e., the cost of such an audit must be paid from the recipient's resources obtained from other than State entities). For information regarding the Florida Catalog of State Financial Assistance (CSFA), a recipient should access the Florida Single Audit Act website located at https:Happs.fldfs.com/fsaa for assistance. In addition to the above websites, the following websites may be accessed for information: Legislature's Website at http://www.leg.state.fl.us/Welcome/index.cfm, State of Florida's website at http://www.mOorida.com/, Department of Financial Services' Website at http://www.fldfs.com/ and the Auditor General's Website at.http://www.mygorida.com/audge PART III: OTHER AUDIT REQUIREMENTS (NOTE: This part would be used to speck any additional audit requirements imposed by the State awarding entity that are solely a matter of that State awarding entity's policy (i.e., the audit is not required by Federal or State laws and is not in conflict with other Federal or State audit requirements). Pursuant to Section 215.97(8), Florida Statutes, State agencies may conduct or arrange for audits of State financial assistance that are in addition to audits conducted in accordance with Section 215.97, Florida Statutes. In such an event, the State awarding agency must arrange for funding the full cost of such additional audits.) PART IV: REPORT SUBMISSION Copies of reporting packages for audits conducted in accordance with OMB Circular A-133, as revised, and 2 CFR Part 200, Subpart F and required by PART I of this Attachment shall be submitted, when required by Section .320.(d), OMB Circular A-133, as revised, and 2 CFR Part 200, Subpart F, by or on behalf of the recipient directly to each of the following: 70 A. The Department of Environmental Protection at of the following addresses: By Mail: Audit Director Florida Department of Environmental Protection Office of the Inspector General, MS 40 3900 Commonwealth Boulevard Tallahassee, Florida 32399-3000 Electronically: FDEPSingleAudit a,dep.state.fl.us B. The Federal Audit Clearinghouse designated in OMB Circular A-133, as revised, and 2 CFR §200.501(a) (the number of copies required by Sections .320 (d)(1) and (2), OMB Circular A-133, as revised, and 2 CFR §200.501(a) should be submitted to the Federal Audit Clearinghouse); at the following address: Federal Audit Clearinghouse Bureau of the Census 1201 East 10th Street Jeffersonville, IN 47132 Submissions of the Single Audit reporting package for fiscal periods ending on or after January 1, 2008, must be submitted using the Federal Clearinghouse's Internet Data Entry System which can be found at http://harvester.census.2ov/facweb/ C. Other Federal agencies and pass-through entities in accordance with Sections .320 (e) and (f), OMB Circular A-133, as revised, and 2 CFR §200.512. Pursuant to Section .320(f), OMB Circular A-133, as revised, and 2 CFR Part 200, Subpart F, the recipient shall submit a copy of the reporting package described in Section .320(c), OMB Circular A-133, as revised, and 2 CFR Part 200, Subpart F, and any management letters issued by the auditor, to the Department of Environmental Protection at one the following addresses: By Mail: . Audit Director Florida Department of Environmental Protection Office of the Inspector General, MS 40 3900 Commonwealth Boulevard Tallahassee, Florida 32399-3000 Electronically: FDEPSingleAudit(adep.state. fl.us 3. Copies of financial reporting packages required by PART II of this Attachment shall be submitted by or on behalf of the recipient directly to each of the following: A. The Department of Environmental Protection at one of the following addresses: By Mail: Audit Director Florida Department of Environmental Protection Office of the Inspector General, MS 40 3900 Commonwealth Boulevard Tallahassee, Florida 32399-3000 71 Electronically: FDEPSingleAudit i ,dep.state.fl.us B. The Auditor General's Office at the following address: State of Florida Auditor General Room 401, Claude Pepper Building 111 West Madison Street Tallahassee, Florida 32399-1450 Copies of reports or management letters required by PART III of this Attachment shall be submitted by or on behalf of the recipient directly to the Department of Environmental Protection at one of the following addresses: By Mail: Audit Director Florida Department of Environmental Protection Office of the Inspector General, MS 40 3900 Commonwealth Boulevard Tallahassee, Florida 32399-3000 Electronically: FDEP Sin,leAudit(&dep. state. fl.us Any reports, management letters, or other information required to be submitted to the Department of Environmental Protection pursuant to this Agreement shall be submitted timely in accordance with OMB Circular A-133, as revised, and 2 CFR Part 200, Subpart F, Florida Statutes, or Chapters 10.550 (local governmental entities) or 10.650 (nonprofit and for-profit organizations), Rules of the Auditor General, as applicable. Recipients, when submitting financial reporting packages to the Department of Environmental Protection for audits done in accordance with OMB Circular A-133, as revised and 2 CFR Part 200, Subpart F, or Chapters 10.550 (local governmental entities) or 10.650 (nonprofit and for-profit organizations), Rules of the Auditor General, should indicate the date that the reporting package was delivered to the recipient in correspondence accompanying the reporting package. PART V: RECORD RETENTION The recipient shall retain sufficient records demonstrating its compliance with the terms of this Agreement for a period of 5 years from the date the audit report is issued, and shall allow the Department of Environmental Protection, or its designee, Chief Financial Officer, or Auditor General access to such records upon request. The recipient shall ensure that audit working papers are made available to the Department of Environmental Protection, or its designee, Chief Financial Officer, or Auditor General upon request for a period of 3 years from the date the audit report is issued, unless extended in writing by the Department of Environmental Protection. REMAINDER OF PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK 72 1-4 � 8 R L O a W y C O y � � d d� C w u L O 0 0 O N GTr F"' O O .LI Q o U .0 O U � H W 67 O Y+ d Q 0 O � .+ w U w O y Q' C V� 0 d � U �z Pr C u �U u � a� d Vl a bq bA 3 v w d u L a O O CO � � 67 G R c L d y y ^�waz p U U < w Cd � 8 R L O a W y a 0 a� •� O Y C ¢ U d b C u L O 0 0 R A N O 0 � O O U SRI d � H W Gri d Q 0 O � .+ w U w O y Q' C V� 0 U u C t ta d Vl C bq bA eCa U H s. 0 a a O CO � � U G R c Cd u CYi C y y u '[ bk d U U < u y Cd w w a1 fW O w 3 d 0 y U YUa O Q nwaz V � C C•� z � M � M O M M r a 0 R A N 0 � O O U d W � a o 0 N Q' C V� u C O +r u Vl C bq bA a q O CO � � 3 G R c O C y y b U U < u y Cd w w a1 fW O ti 0 U � C C•� z � M � M d Cd N N a ti U Y N d a w C7 QM 6� U L O O � Y C y CZ N �i R bA O bA N b O C d � d O M M r GRANT NAME: FDEP Wabasso (Indian River Sector 3) Beach Restoration — GRANT # 17IR2 — Change Order No. 1 AMOUNT OF GRANT: $893,102.60 DEPARTMENT RECEIVING GRANT: Public Works/Coastal En ing eering CONTACT PERSON: James D. Gray, Jr. TELEPHONE: ext. 1344 1. How long is the grant for? April 30, 2021 Expected Starting Date: Feb 26, 2018 YES NO 2. Does the grant require you to fund this function after the grant is over? X 3. Does the grant require a match? X If yes, does the grant allow the match to be In -Kind services? X 4. Percentage of match to grant 50.00 % 5. Grant match amount required $446;551.30 6. Where are the matching funds coming from (i.e. In -Kind Services; Reserve for Contingency)? Local Funding is available from Sector 3 2018 Post Construction Monitoring—Account No. 12814472-033490-05054. Local Funding is available from Other Professional Services — Hurricane Matthew — Sector 3 — Account No. 12814472-066514- 17001 7. Does the grant cover capital costs or start-up costs? If no, how much do you think will be needed in capital costs or start-up costs: $ (Attach a detail listing of costs) 8. Are you adding any additional positions utilizing the grant funds? If yes, please list. (If additional space is needed, please attach a schedule.) No 11!7 Acct. Description Position Position Position Position Position 011.12 Regular Salaries 011.13 Other Salaries & Wages (PT) 012.11 Social Security 012.12 Retirement — Contributions 012.13 Insurance — Life & Health 012.14 Worker's Compensation 012.17 S/Sec. Medicare Matching $ TOTAL 9. What is the total cost of each position including benefits, capital, start-up, auto expense, travel and operating? Salary and Benefits Operating Costs Capital Total Costs 10. What is the estimated cost of the grant to the county over five years? $ Signature of Preparer: Date: 74 Grant Amount Other Match Costs Not Covered Match Total First Year $ $ $ $ Second Year $ $ $ $ Third Year $ $ $ $ Fourth Year $ $ $ $ Fifth Year $ $ $ $ Signature of Preparer: Date: 74 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY MEMORANDUM TO: Jason E. Brown County Administrator THROUGH: Stan Boling, AICP Community Development Director FROM: Roland M. DeBlois, AICP Chief, Environmental Planning DATE: June 12, 2018 RE: Recommendation of Award for Bid No. 2018056: Archie Smith Fish House Dock Restoration It is requested that the Board of County Commissioners formally consider the following information at the Board's regular meeting of June 19, 2018. DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS The historic Archie Smith Fish House property, acquired in 2007 under the County's environmental lands program, consists of approximately 1.15 acres located at 1740 North Indian River Drive within the northern city limits of Sebastian. Structures on the Archie Smith Fish House property consist of the main (principal) house, a boat dock and an ice house (on the dock). Those structures were substantially damaged in the 2004 hurricanes and are in disrepair. In 2014, in conjunction with a grant received from the State Division of Historic Resources, the County contracted with an architectural/engineering firm (Atelier AEC, Inc.) to produce restoration design plans for the structures on the property. In coordination with county staff and with County Historian Ruth Stanbridge, Atelier AEC, which specializes in historic properties restoration, completed the restoration design, including plans for restoration of the historic dock at the site. In March 2015, the Board of County Commissioners authorized staff to apply for a Florida Inland Navigation District (FIND) Waterways Assistance Program (WAP) 50% cost -share funding grant for phased restoration of the dock in accordance with the design plans. FIND approved the County's grant application at a grant award amount of $100,000 for a "first phase" of. restoration of the Archie Smith Fish House dock. The County's current Capital Improvements Element (CIE) provides for County funding in FY 2017/18 to match the FIND grant and cover the subject phase of the Archie Smith Fish House restoration. 75 Scope/Cost Estimate Based on FIND Grant Award Archie Smith Fish House Phase IIA Dock Restorations FIND Waterways Assistance Program Project Project Elements Estimated Cost FIND Cost County Cost Reconstruct main dock, including electrical and fire protection work and construct 4 boat slips $181,800 $90,900 $90,900 Historic site architectural oversight $18,200 $9,100 $9,100 TOTAL $200,000 $100,000 $100,000 In May 2017, a bid solicitation was advertised to obtain the services of a marine contractor to perform the dock restoration work. In soliciting bids, the county broke down the project into alternate components, so that the County could retaining flexibility based on availability of funds for completion of each component, including a "core " component of restoring the existing dock (only). As a result of that bid advertisement, the County received one bid ($625,698), which was presented to the Board on September 19, 2017 for approval consideration. At that time, the Board voted not to approve the bid due to it being higher than expected and not within budgeted funding for the work (see minutes, Attachment 1). The Board also directed staff to re -design the bid and rebid the project to get a better price with a narrowed - down scope of work. In an effort to solicit bids with cost proposals within the budget estimates of the awarded FIND grant, staff rebid the dock restoration project in February 2018 with a narrowed scope of work. Due to a lack of response to the pre-bid meeting (only one firm attended), the Purchasing Manager canceled the bid and the project was then again rebid in April 2018 (with a non -mandatory pre-bid meeting and further narrowed scope), and two bids were received. Following is a summary of the April advertised bid results. Bid Results Advertising Date: April 23, 2018 Bid Opening Date: May 25, 2018 at 2:00 pm DemandStar Broadcast to: 200 Subscribers Specifications Requested by: 22 Firms Replies: 2 Firms The narrowed scope of work for the rebid is summarized as follows: Components Description Component 1 Restoration and modification of existing wood pier, including electrical and fire protection work, using synthetic replacement decking and stainless steel connectors Component 2 Removal of certain deteriorated submerged pilings Component 3 Removal of concrete deck and replace with wood deck east of ice house Component 4 FDEP & ACOE permitting, as necessary The two firms that submitted bids and bid totals are as follows: Proposing Firm I Location Total Bid Underwater Engineering Services, Inc. Fort Pierce $318,516.00 Indian River Docks, LLC Sebastian $186,925.00 This matter is now being presented for the Board to consider authorizing staff negotiations with Indian River Docks, LLC, the low bidder, to conduct the work for the project, within the approved budget of the CIE five-year plan. 2 C:\Users\legistar\AppData\Local\Temp\BCL Technologies\easyPDF 8\@BCL@7C14A4B9\@BCL@7C14A4B9.rtf 76 ANALYSIS The Indian River Docks, LLC bid is within the budgeted funds of the awarded FIND grant. Although the reduced scope of work focuses on repair of the existing dock and deck only, the work is considered a first phase of the overall restoration of structures on the Archie Smith Fish House property and will help secure the dock which is in dilapidated condition and likely to experience further deterioration if the dock is not stabilized and reconstructed. Award of the bid to Indian River Docks at the proposed amount will allow for that first phase restoration to occur, with start of construction within the time frame of the awarded FIND grant to allow for grant funding reimbursement (the grant is set to expire in September 2018). Funding As reflected in the CIE Five -Year Schedule for FY 2017/18, $100,000 is to be funded with FIND grant funds, with the remainder funded by optional sales tax proceeds. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners authorize award of the bid to Indian River Docks. LLC in the amount of $186,925.00, and authorize the Chairman to execute the sample agreement after review and approval by the County Attorney as to form and legal sufficiency, after receipt and approval of the required insurance by the Risk Manager and after receipt and approval of the required Public Construction Bond. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Minutes from 9/19/17 BCC meeting. 2. Indian River Docks, LLC Bid Sheet. 3. Current approved CIE Five -Year Schedule of Capital Improvements. 4. Sample contractor agreement. 3 C:\Users\legistar\AppData\Local\Temp\BCL Technologies\easyPDF 8\@BCL@7C14A4B9\@BCL@7C14A4B9.rtf 77 Board of County Commissioners Meeting Minutes- Final September 19, 2017 draft minutes of today's County Commission meeting showing the Board's approval this item. A motion was made by Commissioner Solari, seconded by Chairman Flescher declare that it is in the public interest to have vegetative debris from Hurrica Irma removed from private rights-of-way to eliminate immediate threats to ife, public. health, and safety, with the condition that work :on private rights f -way does not commence until such time as the work is approved as eligi a for reimbursement and the required approval is received from the Feo6ral Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). The motion carried b the following vote: Ayer 4 - Chairman Flescher, Vice Chairman O'Bryan, Commi loner Adams, and Commissioner Solari Absent: 1 Commissioner Zorc 11.D. 17-0968 Hurricane Irma Recap Recommended Action: Attachments: Staff Report County Administrator on Brown, in his PowerPoint Presentation, gave an overview of events d activities related to Hurricane Irma. Included in his address were details abo the hurricane shelters, power restoration, emergency meal programs by a Salvation Army and Indian River County School Board, the Blue T/Depant's , traffic signal restoration, and some alterations in the Building permitting processes to facilitate homeowner repairs. He described the the storm on County beaches, and announced that Blue Cypress Park was osed due to high water levels: Administrator Brown discussed preliminary private/public damage assessments, and announced that the Florida Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) will be setting up its Disaster Recovery Center at the Brackett Library. He thereafter commended the Emergency Operations Center and other CountyDepartments; Florida Power and Light; City of Vero Beach Electric; Law Enforcement Officers; the Senior Resource Association; Constitutional Officers; community volunteers; and various other entities that provided critical support/assistance to the community before, during, and after the storm. No Action Taken or Required 12. DEPARTMENTAL MATTERS A. Community Development ----� 12.A.1. 17-0909 Recommendation of Award for RFP No. 2017054: Archie Smith Fish House Dock Restoration Indian River County Florida ATTACHMENT 1 Page 25 78 Board of County Commissioners Meeting Minutes- Final. September 19, 2017 Recommended Action: Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners authorize award of the bid to Underwater Engineering Services, Inc:.in the amount of $625,698.00, and authorize the Chairman to execute the sample agreement after review and approval by the County Attorney as to form and legal sufficiency, after receipt and approval of the required insurance by the Risk.Manager and after receipt and approval of the required Public Construction Bond. Attachments: Staff report Drawing of dock restoration alternate components Underwater Engineering Services, Inc. Bid Form Current approved CIE Five -Year Schedule Sample contractor agreement Chief of Environmental Planning & Code Enforcement Roland DeBlois gave a PowerPoint Presentation on the Archie Smith Fish House (the.Fish House) and its proposed restoration design plans. He stated that one quote was received in response to the County's Request for Proposal, and that the responding firm, Underwater Engineering Services, Inc., had estimated the County's cost for the core project dock restoration and ice house restoration at $625,698. Chief DeBlois relayed that $100,000 of the funding would come from a cost -share grant from the Florida Inland Navigation District (FIND), and recommended approval of the bid award to Underwater Engineering Services, Inc. Purchasing Agent Jennifer Hyde addressed questions from the Board regarding the scarcity of bids that were received. Vice Chairman O'Bryan was joined by Chairman Flescher in his analysis that the bid seems high. Commissioner Adams stated that the cost seems consistent with other dock projects and that the renovation of the Fish House ties into Sebastian's Working Waterfront Project. A motion was made by Commissioner Adams, seconded by Commissioner Solari, for discussion, to approve staff's recommendation. Commissioner Solari stated that he would support the Fish House restoration since it had been purchased as a result of a referendum on the purchase of conservation lands. David Cox, 9495 Periwinkle Drive, declared his support for the Fish House restoration, but encouraged the .Board to rebid the project as certain dollar amounts in the bid were too high. Indian River County Florida ATTACHMENT 1 Page 26 79 Board of County Commissioners Meeting Minutes - Final September 19, 2017 P.J. Pastor, Construction Management of Florida, Inc., explained that his firm did not bid because the scope of the project was unclear. The Chairman CALLED THE QUESTION,.and the motion failed by the following vote: Aye: 2 - Commissioner Adams, Commissioner Solari Nay: 2, -Chairman Flescher, Vice Chairman O'Bryan Absent: 1 -Commissioner Zorc A motion was made by Vice Chairman O'Bryan, seconded by Chairman Flescher, to: (1). reject the bid as presented; and (2) direct staff to break the job into smaller parts, such as bidding the removal of the deteriorated pilings/dock separately, and then proceed with other parts of the project at a time when the County may receive more favorable bid results. Commissioner Adams communicated that there have been a lot of queries from the Sebastian Chamber of Commerce and citizens as to when the property would be refurbished, and wanted to know what the timeframe would be before the Fish House project could proceed. Discussion ensued between the. Board and staff about rebidding the project and whether firms could bid. on separate components of the job. Chief DeBlois reminded the Commissioners that the FIND grant will expire in approximately one year. Community Development Director Stan Boling spoke in opposition to making multiple projects out of the Fish House Restoration, but suggested that some clarity be added to the bid specifications. An AMENDED motion was made by Vice Chairman O'Bryan, seconded by Chairman Flescher, to: (1) reject the bid as presented; and (2) direct staff to redesign the bid with more clarity, and rebid the project in six months in an attempt to get a better bid price. Purchasing Agent Hyde mentioned that with respect to preserving the FIND Grant, she would recommend that the Fish House Project be rebid as soon as possible, with the projected commencement date of January 2018. An additional amendment to the motion was made by Vice Chairman O'Bryan, seconded by Chairman Flescher, to reject the bid as currently presented, and direct staff to rebid the Archie Smith Fish House Dock Restoration Project, with a projected commencement date of January 2018. The motion carried by the following vote: Aye: 3 - Chairman Flescher, Vice Chairman O'Bryan, and Commissioner Solari Nay: 1 - Commissioner Adams Absent: 1 - Commissioner Zorc Indian River County F,orida ATTACHMENT 1 80 27 Indian River County Purchasing Division 1800 27th Street Vero Beach, FL 32960 Phone (772) 226-1416 Bid #: Bid Opening Date and Time: Bid Form Archie Smith Fish House Dock Restoration 2018056 May 22, 2018 2:00 P.M. Bid Opening Location: Purchasing Division 1800 271h Street Vero Beach, FL 32960 In accordance with all terms, conditions, specifications, and. requirements, the Bidder offers the following: 1. Lump Sum Price for all items in scope of work I $ 1 '-,Q h Total Bid Price in Words Project completion time after receipt of "Notice to Proceed" or PO: I ?f0 DAYS `����►u; GtJ The undersigned hereby certifies that they have read and understand the contents of this solicitation and agree to furnish at the prices shown any or all of the items above, subject to all instructions, conditions, specifications, and attachments hereto. Failure to have read all the provisions of this solicitation shall not be cause to alter any resulting contract or request additional compensation. Company Name:._ L Lam'. Company Address: t AJsa ra i) 6Av City, State 'u -z of ,- 1,L9 /L) d- Zip Code X35 Telephone: %� r " �"7 3 /. 3. Fax: T' E-mail: r LL)C, e r=�> 62) r� .. Cott Business Tax Receipt Number: I'? •-66 g q k Authorized Signature: Name: Page 11 of 26 FEIN Number: oZ_O '3A! Date: w�-QST / i - Title: ATTACHMENT12 y�Uc ab E. n t; vvoo o Q/Ny� p' E O U O .�_ t W I; EL a m c. m0StRSF+RU A a Oi w �Z O aa� ese400 T � WC O v O C ^ 6 u o f o0 0 N h S N S O O N O `o ON 00 O h h p8 C1 O N « N 0 w in w w w s N ti h N QQ P O N N p O pppp O p O N pp O op O 8 OS N c N S N w VSVA� N w pOo M w pS S v«i rO W O N O O O O O p O w W O S N O N N N O N fV N w N N N VI N O N 0 O N' C U G r! a6 4 u} V. a o o O 9 m m eC7p m a O vj o[ aatl V 5 Z �Z 5z° Z 0 0 0 0 z7 -S•u. <� a„ Nw a2 a2� d� +ati •O y Y U Y P' 01 y = �i E O U"a U°n UaU°a ti Archie Smith FH 2018056 Sample Agreement THIS AGREEMENT is by and between INDIAN RIVER.000NTY, a Political Subdivision of the State of Florida organized and existing under the Laws of the State of Florida, (hereinafter called OWNER) and (hereinafter called CONTRACTOR). OWNER and CONTRACTOR, in consideration of the mutual covenants hereinafter set forth, agree as follows: ARTICLE 1- WORK 1.01 CONTRACTOR shall complete all Work as specified or indicated in the Contract Documents. The Work is generally described as follows: • Restoration and modification of existing wood pier, including electrical and fire protection work, using synthetic replacement decking and stainless steel connectors • Removal of certain deteriorated submerged pilings • Removal of concrete deck and replace with wood deck east of ice house • The applicant is also responsible for obtaining Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) and Army Corps of Engineers (ACOE) permits, as necessary, for the work. ARTICLE 2 - THE PROJECT 2.01 The Project for which the Work under the Contract Documents may be the whole or only a part is generally described as follows: Project Name: Archie Smith Fish House Dock Restoration RFP Number: 2018056 Project Address: 1740 N. Indian River Drive, Sebastian, FL ARTICLE 3 —TERM AND CONTRACT TIMES 3.01 Term: This Agreement shall remain in effect for a term of one (1) year, unless otherwise sooner terminated by mutual consent of the parties. 3.02 Time of Completion: Project shall be completed, to include approval by the Building Division days from receipt of the Notice to Proceed. ARTICLE 4 - CONTRACT PRICE 4.01 OWNER shall pay CONTRACTOR for completion of the Work an amount in current funds equal to the sum of the amounts determined pursuant to paragraph 4.01.A and summarized in paragraph 4.01.13, below: A. For all Work, at the prices stated in CONTRACTOR's Proposal, attached hereto as an exhibit. B. THE CONTRACT SUM subject to additions and deductions provided in the Contract Documents: Page 17 of 25 ATTACHKA.RNT 4 Archie Smith FH 2018056 Numerical Amount: Written Amount: ARTICLE 5 — PAYMENT PROCEDURES 5.01 Method of Payment Owner shall. make only one payment for the entire amount of the contract when the. work has been completed. Upon a determination of satisfactory completion, the COUNTY Project Manager will authorize payment to be made. All payments for services shall be made to the .CONTRACTOR by the COUNTY in accordance with the Local Government Prompt Payment Act, as may be amended from time to time (Section 218.70, Florida Statutes, et seq.). 5.02 Acceptance of Final Payment as Release The acceptance by the CONTRACTOR of final paymentshall be and shall operate as a release to the OWNER from all claims and all liability to the CONTRACTOR other than claims in stated amounts as maybe specifically excepted by the CONTRACTOR for all things done or furnished in connection with the work under this Agreement and for every act and neglect of the OWNER and others relating to or arising out of the work. Any payment, however, final or otherwise, shall not release the CONTRACTOR or its sureties from any obligations under this Agreement, the Invitation to Bid or the Public Construction Bond. ARTICLE 6 —INDEMNIFICATION 6.01 The CONTRACTOR shall indemnify and hold harmless the OWNER, and its officers and employees, from liabilities, damages, losses, and costs, including, but not limited to, reasonable attorneys' fees; to the extent caused by the negligence, recklessness, or intentionally wrongful misconduct of the CONTRACTOR and other persons employed or utilized by the CONTRACTOR in the performance of the Work. ARTICLE 7 - CONTRACTOR'S REPRESENTATIONS 7.01 In order to induce OWNER to enter into this Agreement, CONTRACTOR makes the:following representations: A. CONTRACTOR has examined and carefully studied the Contract Documents and the other related data identified in the Request for Proposal documents. B. CONTRACTOR has visited the Site and become familiar with and is satisfied as to the general, local, and Site conditions that may affect cost, progress, and performance of the Work. C. CONTRACTOR is familiar with and is satisfied as to all federal, state, and local Laws and Regulations that may affect cost, progress, and performance of the Work. D. CONTRACTOR has obtained and carefully studied (or assumes responsibility for having done so) all additional or supplementary examinations, investigations, explorations, tests, studies, and data concerning conditions Page 18 of 25 Archie Smith FH 2018056 (surface, subsurface, and Underground Facilities) at or contiguous to the Site which may affect cost, progress, or performance of the Work or which relate to any aspect of the means, methods, techniques, sequences, and procedures of construction to be employed by CONTRACTOR, including applying the specific means,. methods, techniques, sequences, and procedures of construction, if any, expressly required by the Contract Documents to be employed by CONTRACTOR, and safety precautions and programs incident thereto. E. CONTRACTOR does not consider that any further examinations, investigations, explorations, tests, studies, or data are necessary, for the performance of the Work at the Contract Price, within the Contract. Times, and in accordance with the other terms and conditions of the Contract Documents. F. CONTRACTOR is aware of the general nature of work to be performed by OWNER and others at the Site that relates to the Work as indicated in the Contract Documents. G. CONTRACTOR has correlated the information known to CONTRACTOR, information and observations obtained from visits to the Site, reports and drawings identified in the Contract Documents, and all additional examinations, investigations, explorations, tests, studies, and data with the Contract Documents. H. CONTRACTOR has given OWNER written notice of all conflicts, errors, ambiguities, or discrepancies that CONTRACTOR has discovered in the Contract Documents., and the written resolution thereof by OWNER is acceptable to CONTRACTOR. I. The. Contract Documents are. generally sufficient to indicate and convey understanding of all terms and conditions for performance and furnishing of the Work. ARTICLE 8 - CONTRACT DOCUMENTS 8.01 Contents A. The Contract Documents consist of the following: (1) This Agreement (pages 1 to 7 , inclusive); (2) Notice to Proceed (3) Public Construction Bond (pages_toJ inclusive); (4) Certificate of Liability Insurance (5) Invitation to Bid 2018056 (6) Addenda (numbers _to_, inclusive); (7) CONTRACTOR'S Bid Form (pages_toJ inclusive); (8) Bid Bond (pages_inclusive); (9) Drug Free Workplace Form (pages_to_, inclusive); (10) Affidavit of Compliance (page_); (11) Sworn Statement Under Section 105.08, Indian River County Code, on Disclosure of. Relationships (pages—to inclusive); Page 19 of 25 Archie Smith FH 2018056 (12) The following which may be delivered or issued on or after the Effective Date of the Agreement and are not attached hereto: a) Written Amendments; b) Work Change Directives; c) Change Order(s). ARTICLE 9 — MISCELLANEOUS 9.1 Terms A. Terms used in this Agreement will have the meanings indicated in the Invitation to Bid. 9.2 Assignment of Contract A. No assignment by a party hereto of any rights under or interests in the Agreement will be binding on another party hereto without the written consent of the parry sought to be bound; and, specifically but without limitation, moneys that may become due and moneys that are due may not be assigned without such consent (except to the extent that the effect of this restriction may be limited by law), and unless specifically stated to the contrary in any written consent to an assignment, no assignment will release or discharge the assignor from any duty or responsibility under the Contract Documents. 9.3 Successors and Assigns A. OWNER and CONTRACTOR each binds itself, its partners, successors, assigns, and legal representatives to the other party hereto, its partners, successors, assigns, and, legal representatives in respect to all covenants, agreements, and obligations contained in the Contract Documents. 9.4 Severability A. Any provision or part of the Contract Documents held to be void or unenforceable under a.ny Law or Regulation shall be deemed stricken, and all remaining provisions shall continue to be valid and binding upon OWNER and CONTRACTOR, who agree that the Contract Documents shall be reformed to replace such stricken provision or part thereof with a valid and enforceable provision that comes as close as possible to expressing the intention of the stricken provision. 9.5 Venue A. This Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of Florida. Venue for any lawsuit brought by either party against the other party or otherwise arising out of this Agreement shall be in.lndian River County, Florida, or, in the event of a federal jurisdiction, in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida. 9.6 Public Records Compliance A. Indian River County is a public agency subject to Chapter 119, Florida Statutes. The Contractor shall comply with Florida's Public Records Law. Specifically, the Contractor shall: Page 20 of 25 86 Archie Smith FH 2018056 (1) Keep and maintain public records required by the County to perform the service. (2) Upon request from the County's Custodian of Public Records, provide the County with a copy of the requested records or allow the records to be inspected or copied within a reasonable time at a cost that does not exceed the cost provided in Chapter 119 or as otherwise provided by law. (3) Ensure that public records that are exempt or confidential and exempt from public records disclosure requirements are not disclosed except as authorized by law for the duration of the contract term and following completion of the contract if the contractor does not transfer the records to the County. (4) Upon completion of the contract, transfer, at no cost, to the County all public records in possession of the Contractor or keep and maintain public records required by the County to perform the service. If the Contractor transfers all public records to the County upon completion of the contract, the Contractor shall destroy any duplicate public records that are exempt or confidential and exempt from public records disclosure requirements. If the contractor keeps and maintains public records upon completion of the contract, the Contractor shall meet all applicable requirements for retaining public records. All records stored electronically must be provided to the County, upon request from the Custodian of Public Records, in a format that is compatible with the information technology systems of the County. IF THE CONTRACTOR HAS QUESTIONS REGARDING THE APPLICATION OF CHAPTER 119, FLORIDA STATUTES, TO THE CONTRACTOR'S DUTY TO PROVIDE PUBLIC RECORDS RELATING TO THIS CONTRACT, CONTACT THE CUSTODIAN OF PUBLIC RECORDS AT: (772) 226-1424 publicrecords@irceov.com Indian River County Office of the County Attorney 180127th Street Vero Beach, FL 32960 Failure of the Contractor to comply with these requirements shall be a material breach of this Agreement. P.age 21 of 25 87 Archie Smith FH 2018056 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, OWNER and CONTRACTOR have signed this Agreement in duplicate. One counterpart each has been delivered to OWNER and CONTRACTOR. All portions of the Contract Documents have been signed or identified by OWNER and CONTRACTOR or on their behalf This Agreement will be effective on , 20_ (the date the Contract is approved by the Indian River County Board of County Commissioners, which is the Effective Date of the Agreement). OWNER: INDIAN RIVER COUNTY By: Peter D. O'Bryan, Chairman By: Jason E. Brown, County Administrator APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGAL SUFFICIENCY: By: Dylan Reingold, County Attorney Jeffrey R. Smith, Clerk of Court and Comptroller Attest: Deputy Clerk (SEAL) Designated Representative: Name: Roland DeBlois Title: Chief, Environmental Planning and Code Enforcement Address: 180127th Street, Vero Beach, FL 32960 Phone: (772) 226-1258 Email: rdeblois@irc�ov.com CONTRACTOR: M (Contractor) (CORPORATE SEAL) Attest Address for giving notices: Agent for service of process: Designated Representative: Name: Title: Address: Phone: Email: (If CONTRACTOR is a corporation or partnership, Attach evidence of authority to sign.) Page 22 of 25 88 • INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA MEMORANDUM TO: Jason E. Brown, County Administrator THROUGH: Richard B. Szpyrka, P.E., Public Works Director FROM: Monique Filipiak, Land Acquisition Specialist SUBJECT: Land Purchase - Future Expansion Owner: Norman R. Lamothe & Roberta F. Lamothe 405 351h Avenue, Vero Beach, FL 32968 DATE: June 8, 2018 DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS Norman R. Lamothe & Roberta F. Lamothe are the owners of a 0.2 acre parcel of unimproved land located in the Clemann Estates at 405 35th Avenue, Vero Beach, FL 32968. The County currently owns three parcels on 4th Street (Citrus Road) from 35th to 37th Avenue. Acquiring this parcel will provide the County with additional land to do future road expansion in the area. Staff was contacted by Mr. Lamothe in February 2018, to inquire if the County was interested in purchasing the parcel. The property is unimproved vacant land and is zoned RS -6 Multiple -Family Residential District, up to 6 units/acres. The current value of the land is $10,203.00 based on the Property Appraiser website for 2017. The County forwarded the Purchase and Sell Agreement to Mr. and Mrs. Lamothe with an offer of $10,203.00 on 5/7/18. They have agreed to accept the price of $10,203.00 and they have executed the Purchase and Sell Agreement. FUNDING Funding for this expenditure is budgeted and available from Optional Sales Tax/Misc. Right of Way, Acct# 31521441-066120. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends the Board approve the Purchase Agreement for 0.2 acres of property located at 405 351h Avenue, Vero Beach, FL 32968, and authorize the Chairman to execute the purchase agreement on behalf of the Board. ATTACHMENTS One Original Purchase Agreement One Location Map APPROVED AGENDA ITEM FOR: June 19. 2018 89 C:\Users\legistar\AppData\Local\Temp\BCL Technologies\easyPDF 8\@BCL@7C14A03A\@BCL@7C14A03A.doc AGREEMENT TO PURCHASE AND SELL REAL ESTATE BETWEEN INDIAN RIVER COUNTY AND NORMAN R. LAMOTHE AND ROBERTA F. LAMOTHE THIS AGREEMENT TO PURCHASE AND SELL REAL ESTATE ("Agreement") is made and entered into as of the day of , 2018, by and between Indian River County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida ("the County"), and Norman R. Lamothe and Roberta F. Lamothe ("the Seller) who agree as follows: WHEREAS, Seller owns property located at 405 35th Avenue, Vero Beach, Florida. A legal description of the property is attached to this agreement as Exhibit "A" and incorporated by reference herein; and WHEREAS, the County owns several parcels along 4th Street and is purchasing right-of-way for future expansion; and WHEREAS, in order to proceed with future expansion plans, the County needs to purchase the corner parcel located at 405 35th Avenue; and WHEREAS, the Seller contacted the County to purchase the parcel of approximately 8,712 square feet or 0.2 acres of property as depicted on Exhibit "A", and WHEREAS, the Parties agree this is an arm's length transaction between the Seller and the County, without the threat of eminent domain. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual terms, conditions, promises, covenants and premises hereinafter, the COUNTY and SELLER agree as follows: 1. Recitals. The above recitals are affirmed as being true and correct and are incorporated herein. 2. Agreement to Purchase and Sell. The Seller hereby agrees to sell to the County, and the County hereby agrees to purchase from Seller, upon the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement that certain parcel of real property located at 405 35th Avenue, Vero Beach, Florida and more specifically described in the legal description attached as Exhibit "A", fee simple, containing approximately 0.2 acres, all improvements thereon, together with all easements, rights and uses now or hereafter belonging thereto (collectively, the "Property"). 2.1 Purchase Price, Effective Date. The purchase price ("Purchase Price") for the Property shall be $10,203.00 (Ten Thousand, Two Hundred and Three and 00/100 Dollars). The Purchase Price shall be paid on the Closing Date. The Effective Date of this Agreement shall be the date upon which the County shall have approved the execution of this Agreement, either by approval by the Indian River County Board of County Commissioners at a formal meeting of such Board or by the County Administrator pursuant to his delegated authority. 90 3. Title. Seller shall convey marketable title to the Property by warranty deed free of claims, liens, easements and encumbrances of record or known to Seller; but subject to property taxes for the year of Closing and covenants, restrictions and public utility easements of record provided (a) there exists at Closing no violation of any of the foregoing; and (b) none of the foregoing prevents County's intended use and development of the Property ("Permitted Exceptions"). 3.1 County may order an Ownership and Encumbrance Report or Title Insurance Commitment with respect to the Property. County shall within fifteen (15) days following the Effective Date of this Agreement deliver written notice to Seller of title defects. Title shall be deemed acceptable to County if (a) County fails to deliver notice of defects within the time specified, or (b) County delivers notice and Seller cures the defects within thirty (30) days from receipt of notice from County of title defects ("Curative Period"). Seller shall use best efforts to cure the defects within the Curative Period and if the title defects are not cured within the Curative Period, County shall have thirty (30) days from the end of the Curative Period to elect, by written notice to Seller, to: (i) to terminate this Agreement, whereupon shall be of no further force and effect, or (ii) extend the Curative Period for up to an additional 90 days; or (iii).accept title subject to existing defects and proceed to closing. 4. Representations of the Seller. 4.1 Seller is indefeasibly seized of marketable, fee simple title to the Property, and is the sole owner of and has good right, title, and authority to convey and transfer the Property which is the subject matter of this Agreement, free and clear of all liens and encumbrances. 4.2 From and after the Effective Date of this Agreement, Seller shall take no action which would impair or otherwise affect title to any portion of the Property, and shall record no documents in the Public Records which would affect title to the Property, without the prior written consent of the County. 4.3.1 There are no existing or pending special assessments affecting the Property, which are or may be assessed by any governmental authority, water or sewer authority, school district, drainage district or any other special taxing district. 5. Default. 5.1 In the event the County shall fail to .perform any of its obligations hereunder, the Seller shall, at its sole option, be entitled to: (i) terminate this Agreement by written notice delivered to the County at or prior to the Closing Date and thereupon neither the Seller nor any other person or party shall have any claim for specific performance, damages, or otherwise against the County; or (ii) waive the County's default and proceed to Closing. 5.2 In the event the Seller shall fail to perform any of its obligations hereunder, the County shall, at its sole option, be entitled to: (i) terminate this Agreement by written notice delivered to the Seller at or prior to the Closing Date and thereupon neither the County nor 91 any other person or party shall have any claim for specific performance, damages or otherwise against the Seller; or (ii) obtain specific performance of the terms and conditions hereof; or (iii) waive the Seller's default and proceed to Closing: 6. Closing. 6.1 The closing of the transaction contemplated herein ("Closing" and "Closing Date") shall take place within 45 days following the execution of the contract by the Chairman of the Board of County Commissioners. The parties agree that the Closing shall be as follows: (a) The Seller shall execute and deliver to the County a warranty deed conveying marketable title to the Property, free and clear of all liens and encumbrances and in the condition required .by paragraph 3. (b) If Seller is obligated to discharge any encumbrances at or prior to Closing and fails to do so, County may use a portion of Purchase Price funds to satisfy the encumbrances. (c) If the Seller is a non-resident alien or foreign entity, Seller shall deliver to the County an affidavit, in a form acceptable to the County, certifying that the Seller and any interest holders are not subject to tax under the Foreign Investment and Real Property Tax Act of 1980. (d) The Seller and the County shall each deliver to the other such other documents or instruments as may reasonably be required to close this transaction. 6.2 Taxes. All taxes and special assessments which are a lien upon the property on or prior to the Closing Date (except current taxes which are not yet due and payable) shall be paid by the Seller. 7. Personal Property. 7.1 The Seller shall have removed all of its personal property, equipment and trash from the Property. The Seller shall deliver possession of the Property to County vacant and in the same or better condition that existed at the Effective Date hereof. 7.2 Seller shall deliver at Closing all keys to locks and codes to access devices to County, if applicable. 8. Closing Costs; Expenses. County shall be responsible for preparation of all Closing documents. 8.1 County shall pay the following expenses at Closing: 8.1.1 The cost of recording the warranty deed and any release or satisfaction obtained by Seller pursuant to this Agreement. 8.1.2 Documentary Stamps required to be affixed to the warranty deed. 92 8.1.3 All costs and premiums for the owner's marketability title insurance commitment and policy, if any. 8.2 Seller shall pay the following expenses at or prior to Closing: 8.2.1 All costs necessary to cure title defect(s) or encumbrances, other than the Permitted Exceptions, and to satisfy or release of record all existing mortgages, liens or encumbrances upon the Property. 9. Miscellaneous. 9.1 Controlling Law. This Agreement shall be construed and enforced in accordance with the laws of the State of Florida. Venue shall be in Indian River County for all state court matters, and in the Southern District of Florida for all federal court matters. 9.2 Entire Agreement. This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement between the parties with respect to this transaction and supersedes all prior agreements, written or oral, between the Seller and the County relating to the subject matter hereof. Any modification or amendment to this Agreement shall be effective only if in writing and executed by each of the parties. 9.3 Assignment and Binding Effect. Neither County nor Seller may assign its rights and obligations under this Agreement without the prior written consent of the other party. The terms hereof shall be binding upon and shall inure to the benefit of the parties hereto and their successors and assigns. 9.4 Notices. Any notice shall be deemed duly served if personally served or if mailed by certified mail, return receipt requested, or if sent via "overnight" courier service or facsimile transmission, as follows: If to Seller: Norman R Lamothe & Roberta F. Lamothe 925 Nash Loop The Villages, FL 32162 If to County: Indian River County 1801 27th Street Vero Beach, FL 32960 Attn: Land Acquisition/Monique Filipiak Either party may change the information above by giving written notice of such change as provided in this paragraph. 9.5 Survival and Benefit. Except as otherwise expressly provided herein, each agreement, representation or warranty made in this Agreement by or on behalf of either party, or in any instruments delivered pursuant hereto or in connection herewith, shall survive the Closing Date and the consummation of the transaction provided for herein. 93 The covenants, agreements and undertakings of each of the parties hereto are made solely for the benefit of, and may be relied on only by the other party hereto, its successors and assigns, and are not made for the benefit of, nor may they be relied upon, by any other person whatsoever. 9.6 Attorney's Fees and Costs. In any claim or controversy arising out of or relating to this Agreement, each party shall bear its own attorney's fees, costs, and expenses. 9.7 Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in two or more counterparts, each one of which shall constitute an original. 9.8 County Approval Required: This Agreement is subject to approval by the Indian River County Board of County Commissioners as set forth in paragraph 2. 9.9 Beneficial Interest Disclosure: In the event Seller is a partnership, limited partnership, corporation, trust, or any form of representative capacity whatsoever for others, Seller shall provide a fully completed, executed, and sworn beneficial interest disclosure statement in the form attached to this Agreement as an exhibit that complies with all of the provisions of Florida Statutes Section 286.23 prior to approval of this Agreement by the County. However, pursuant to Florida Statutes Section 286.23 (3) (a), the beneficial interest in any entity registered with the Federal Securities and Exchange Commission, or registered pursuant to Chapter 517, Florida Statutes, whose interest is for sale to the general public, is exempt from disclosure; and where the Seller is a non-public entity, that Seller is not required to disclose persons or entities holding less than five (5%) percent of the beneficial interest in Seller. 94 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed this Agreement as of the date first set forth above. INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Peter D. O'Bryan, Chairman Approved by BCC ATTEST: Jeffrey R. Smith, Clerk of Court and Comptroller IN Deputy Clerk Approved: Jason E. Brown, County Administrator V-IL�—z aorm nd Legal --Sufficiency: William K. DeBraal, Deputy County Attorney Norman R. Lamothe Date zwva -�? /" Roberta F. Lamothe Date 95 EXHIBIT "A" CLEMANN ESTATES UNIT NO 1 PBI 3-63 LOTS - 23 & 24 LESS S 25 FT FOR RD RNV BLK G Commonly known as: 405 35th Avenue, Vero Beach, FL 32968 Parcel ID Number: 33-39-15-00005-0007-00023.0 96 Indian River County, Florida Property Appraiser -Printer Friendly- Map.. Page 1 of 1 Print I Back Indian River County GIS Parcell D OwnerName , PropertyAddress 33391500005000700023.0 LAMOTHE NORMAN R & 405 35TH AV VERO BEACH, FL 32968 Notes http://www.irepa.org/PrintMap.aspx �_� 97 4/24/2018 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA AGENDA ITEM Assistant County Administrator / Department of General Services DOM E40AM CONSENT June 11, 2018 To: The Honorable Board of County Commissioners Through: Jason E. Brown, County Administrator BCC Meeting 06-19-2018 From: Date: June 11, 2018 To: The Honorable Board of County Commissioners Through: Jason E. Brown, County Administrator Michael C. Zito, Assistant County Administrator From: Brad Bernauer, Director Human Services Subject: Children's Services Advisory Committee's Funding Allocations for FY 2018-2019 BACKGROUND The Children's Services Advisory Committee (CSAC) received 40 programs from 26 agencies in response to RFP #2018050. The total amount originally requested by the agencies applying was $1,954,975. The CSAC Grant Review Committee met for three days, June 7th, 8" and 91h to determine a final recommendation for funding in the amount of $1,663,965 for the 2018-19 fiscal year. The Children's Service Advisory Committee met on June 11th, and voted to approve the attached funding recommendations. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the CSAC's funding recommendations for FY 2018-19. ATTACHMENT: Recommended Funding Allocations APPROVED AGENDA ITEM FOR JUNE 19, 2018 C:\Users\legistar\AppData\Local\Temp\BCL Technologies\easyPDF 8\@BCL@OC1D5381\@BCL@OC1D5381.doc 99 100 �.oi o 00 00 Y wE QP O C N N N N h 0 8� 8 �orNN 181 m 'gm'SS �8n$'�•S•��»9m.�'SS88o8•ma0000S��•gSB��oo S � e '�� E�S�n `mS3 9 9iRm^S�RS��S 5�S9�RRR S��SrR� � n � P� � ame�8 oa3on•SoSmSn�ymSBe000 eno$meN$oS�coogReSg m m E�m�'n gn.NVN'rom�a.m.n.'�,nn� a$R'o my r.'+Rnn mn�+.i 5i p Om�on �s � aN�-RRRRR�Hm8 $9 S< RRR< SB.; mR $ m SaNg IT gg4QQQQ QQ Pa Qgg �$�a .252Sgg QgQQ 'o Qq 2525 ,o�FS�S$ yy QQgg S25 g wmSo a �ffih�RBRk„.°°S�S> SSBM RR H S< '°RSRRH � « z 6 $�o§ggao N O m m < 00 « y b m 0 N N O O G• O Om O 4 p � t m N 599 11 o go o§ s o =s m y $ $dao �,RN emm oe mo�om 000 m � a m8S8 X88 88$$8 S. $ $S8 88 8 88 8 $ oR 6F����� •ogo o ,0 `6 oo s r ti I Q N 0 O g N N^ O O O m N V V o a E �¢ xc a`J ypV E NY€ y B2s Em$��O cb,q bangg q� � m9 �I?oqQE E' •� �� 8 m +gx a o” 'm � ,`eg p2LL y ;goa w afw wFP'E.5 � 2 'gut ppE'�°e_gmq xu 9& qqpppp "p�$'gbgU$+S tmp 'C�paR §gq4y0P sr x ut"'3 e- U' N 6 Q a V N I W f 1 a CV pp m> m V Fgem uu 3i=°.�R a gFg �zs� s Y er.55 r m V UG�w wwu(7 C7S 2 rYr 2OC C y`u�i w r 3> 100 a 4 s o Q 101 E m O Q N d 0 U _ N o`c4 b o ET E c Z c m '0 .o y W E•¢ = U a .o _c E d a E L _ U Am`co _- o m� m =V w mU v m •a° c J ti A W O rE mE�E ci FFob mm -E mopgwadow- mdyB-ccoco% p N L V a 0 C C 61 z !0 m $� wm°ob_oxovp O jC: Wu•0Uv0 L J C L y��"b L m U F- E-ypNQ�WO�CWO U O � RQ LL y'�• NLOJ ca N O aUanc�a`anrn3oWW��iarnmaxzt�cnai��ac�c`3n�mw�¢m V@ O Ol t0 O N N y N @ d 7 L N o 0 O c S> •C N •- O S C J N o m U c Z to m d pc cy _ U O U C Ocr 'O a b LL O m L _ NN _ m O N mv v L L cra w j U wwwc7t�x irYr �o a. (i inm u>r 3> 101 X INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF UTILITY SERVICES Date: June 11, 2018 To: Jason E. Brown, County Administrator From: Vincent Burke, P.E., Director of Utility Services Prepared By: John M. Boyer, P.E., Utilities Engineer Subject: Approval of Blue Goose Construction Work Authorization 2018-003: "61ST Drive Water Main Replacement" DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS: Indian River County Department of Utilities Services (IRCDUS) will need to replace a segment of 6" water main along 611t Drive north of CR 510. The leaking segment was installed via directional bore; a new directional bore will be installed in its place. A breakdown of labor and.material cost is presented below. ANALYSIS: Staff has determined the most efficient and timely method to construct the replacement water main is to utilize the IRCDUS labor contractor, Blue Goose Construction. A list of the anticipated labor and material quantities was prepared, and bid prices from the Blue Goose Construction contract were used to calculate the labor expense. The total material cost was based on unit prices derived from the Annual Contract for Utility Warehouse Stock. Construction cost breaks down as follows (see Attachment 1): 1. Labor Expense (Blue Goose Construction): $27,775.00 2. Materials: $ 7,339.20 Total Construction Cost: $35,114.20 FUNDING: Funds for this project are derived from the Renewal and Replacement (R&R) budget in the operating fund. The operating fund budget is derived from water and sewer revenues. ACCOUNT NAME ACCOUNT NUMBER AMOUNT 611t Drive Water Main Replacement 1 47123536-044699-18524 $35,114.20 102 61" Drive Water Main Replacement Blue Goose WA #2018-003 RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners approve Work Authorization No. 2018-003 to retain Blue Goose Construction to construct the water main replacement, and to authorize staff to direct purchase related materials. ATTACHMENT(s): 1. Cost Estimate = Labor & Material 2. Work Authorization No. 2018-003 C:\Users\legistar\AppData\Local\Temp\BCL Technologies\easyPDF 8\@BCL@7C159B30\@BCL@7C159B30.docx 103 Indian River County Department of Utilities CONSTRUCTION BUDGET - Labor Contract & Direct Purchase. Project: 61st Drive Water Main Replacement Attachment i By: John M. Boyer, P.E. Date: May 30, 2018 LABOR COSTS MATERIAL COSTS (IRC Direct Purchase) Bid Bid Item Estimated Unit of Labor Unit I Total Labor Material Unit Total Material Item No. Description Quantity Measure Price Price Price Price 01c Install 6" PVC Water Main 40 LF $6.00 $240.00 $4.80 $192.00 07b Install 6' HDPE Horizontal Directional Drill (SDR -11) 200 LF $38.85 $7,770.00 $6.00 $1,200.00 including fusion of MJ adaptors 9 Install Mechanical Restrained Joint Ductile Iron Fitting 0.25 Ton $4,100.00 $1,025.00 $4,100.00 $1,025.00 30a Install Mechanical Restrained Joints on Existing Main, 3" 12 EA $60.00 $720.00 $70.00 $840.00 through 8" 13a Grout Pipe Abandoned and Left in Place, 3" through 8" 220 LF $12.00 $2,640.00 $12.00 $2,640.00 23 Test Holes / Potholes 4 EA $250.00 $1,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 28 Install Temporary Jumper and Remove after FDEP 1 EA $500.00 $500.00 $0.00 $0.00 Clearance 29a Fill, pressure test, chlorinate, and flush water main, 4" 240 LF $1.50 $360.00 $0.00 $0.00 through 8" 30b Install Sample Point per County Detail, Remove after 2 EA $275.00 $550.00 $0.00 $0.00 FDEP Clearance 67b Remove, Dispose of and/or Replace Rock Base Course, 5 Ton $20.00 $100.00 $50.00 $250.00 Compacted to County Specifications 67c Remove, Dispose of and/or Replace Stabilized Sub- 5 Ton $14.00 $70.00 $50.00 $250.00 Grade Course, Compacted to County Specifications 86a Lawn Restoration (Topsoil & Sod) Includes Watering 100 SY $2.25 $225.00 $2.75 $275.00 88a Well Point Dewatering Set Up, Tier Depth up to 25', 2 LS $3,500.00 $7,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 (Minimum 30'X 30' Work Area) 88b Well Point Dewatering; Additional Points Needed for 30 EA $25.00 $750.00 $0.00 $0.00 Larger Area or Linear Work 91 Mobilization, Demobilization, MOT (based on 10% Labor 1LS $2,300.00 $2,300.00 $0.00 $0.00 Cost): Subtotals: Labor: $25,250.00 Material: $6,672.00 Contingency: 10% $2,525.00 10% $667.20 Labbr. ^$27,775:00 - -'---Nlateriaid -"` -"$7,339.20 TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COST: $35,114.20 FDEP PERMIT FEE: n/r Eng. Design (by Staff): $0.00 Geotechnical Testing: $0.00 Stake -Out & As -Built Survey (by Staff): $0.00 TOTAL PROJECT BUDGET: $35,114.20 FAURlitles\UTIUTY - Engin ft\P,o7ects - Capital Prolms\18,0516 61VDR WaterBep\Cost Estimate - 61st)r Water.xisx 104 WORK AUTHORIZATION DIRECTIVE No. 2018-003 61" Drive Water Main Replacement BLUE GOOSE CONSTRUCTION DATE OF ISSUANCE: June 11, 2018 ATTACHMENT 2 EFFECTIVE DATE: June 19, 2018 OWNER: Indian River County CONTRACTOR: Blue Goose Construction CONTRACT: WATER, SEWER AND RECLAIM WATER LINE REPLACEMENT / EXTENSIONS AND MISCELLANEOUS LABOR CONTRACT, BID NO. 2015001, AWARDED September 9. M14 PROJECT: 61St Drive Water Main Replacement COUNTY UTILITY PROJECT NO.: UCP NIA CONTRACTOR'S PROJECT NO.: N A COUNTY WIP. No. 47123536-044699-1852 You are directed to proceed promptly with the following work: Description: Install 6" directional bore to replace failed existing water main along 61" Drive. Method of determining Contract Price: Unit Prices: Bid Items as established pursuant to Bid No. 2015001, and awarded by the Board of County Commissioners on September 9, 2014 to Blue Goose Construction, Inc. © Lump Sum © Cost of the Work The Cost of Labor, Contingency and Contract Time is summarized below: Labor Cost = $27,775.00 Estimated 90 days from NTP Contract Time: ACCEPT RECOMMENDED: By: By: Blue Goose Construction John M. Boyer E. - --Labor Contractor- - Utilities Engineer— Date: 4� /// t Z_e"01 Date: APPROVED: By: COUNTY, CHAIRMAN Peter D. O'Bryan — Date: F:\Utilities\UTIUTY - Engineering\Projects - Capital Projects\18-0516 63stOR WaterRep\Agenda Item\18-0619 WA Approval\Work Authorization No. 2018.003.doc 105 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF UTILITY SERVICES Date: June 6, 2018 To: Jason E. Brown, County Administrator From: Vincent Burke, P.E., Director of Utility Services Prepared By: John M. Boyer, P.E., Utilities Engineer Subject: Approval of Blue Goose Construction Work Authorization 2018-004: "12th Avenue SW Water Service Replacement" DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS: Indian River County Department of Utilities Services (IRCDUS) will need to replace a residential water service along 12th Avenue SW. In responding to customer complaints, IRCDUS staff found the subject water service to be on a neighboring property and subject to root action from mature landscape. The service will be built to current standards on the serviced property. A breakdown of labor and material cost for is presented below. ANALYSIS - Staff has determined the most efficient and timely method to replace the subject water service is to utilize the IRCDUS labor contractor, Blue Goose Construction. A list of the anticipated labor and material quantities was prepared, and bid prices from the Blue Goose Construction contract were used to calculate the labor expense. The total material cost was based on unit prices derived from the Annual Contract for Utility Warehouse Stock. Construction cost breaks down as follows (see Attachment 1): 1. Labor Expense (Blue Goose Construction): $2,113.13 2. Materials: $1,531.11 Total Construction Cost: $3,644.24 FUNDING: Funds for this project are derived from the Renewal and Replacement (R&R) budget in the operating fund. The operating fund budget is derived from water and sewer revenues. ACCOUNT NAME I ACCOUNT NUMBER AMOUNT 12th Avenue SW Water Service Replacement 1 47126936-044699 $3,644.24 106 1211 Avenue SW Water Service Replacement Blue Goose WA #2018-004 RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners approve Work Authorization No. 2018-004 and authorize the Purchasing Division to issue a purchase order to retain Blue Goose Construction to construct the water service replacement, and to authorize staff to direct purchase related materials. ATTACHMENT(s): 1. Work Authorization No. 2018-004 2. Cost Estimate— Labor & Material C:\Users\legistar\AppData\Local\Temp\BCL Technologies\easyPDF 8\@BCL@7C15CFEE\@BCL@7C15CFEE.docx 107 WORK AUTHORIZATION DIRECTIVE No. 2018-004 12w Street SW Water Service Replacement BLUE GOOSE CONSTRUCTION DATE OF ISSUANCE: May 30, 2018 ATTACHMENT 1 EFFECTIVE DATE: June 19, 2018 OWNER: Indian River County CONTRACTOR: Blue Goose Construction CONTRACT- WATER, SEWER AND RECLAIM WATER LINE REPLACEMENT / EXTENSIONS AND MISCELLANEOUS LABOR CONTRACT BID NO. 2015001 AWARDED September 9, 2014 PROJECT: 12th Street SW Water Service Replacement COUNTY UTILITY PROJECT NO.: UCP N/A CONTRACTOR'S PROJECT NO.: N/A 'COUNTY WIP. No. N/A You are directed to proceed promptly with the following work: Description: Replace existing double water service. Method of determining Contract Price: © Unit Prices: Bid Items as established pursuant to Bid No. 2015001, and awarded by the Board of County Commissioners on September 9, 2014 to Blue Goose Construction, Inc. 0 Lump Sum Cost of the Work The Cost of Labor, Contingency and Contract Time is summarized below: Labor Cost = $2,113.13 Estimated 90 days from NTP Contract Time: ACCEPTE By:--=� -- — — -Blue Goose -Construction .- Laborr Contractor Date: RECOMMENDED: By: Z�&� - _11ohn M. Boyer, Utilities Engineer Date: 40/46 APPROVED: By: _COUNTY,.CHAIRMAN Peter D. O'Bryan Date: F:\Uti1;ties\UTILITY - Engineering\Projects • capital Projects\18.05212325 12th St SW\Work Authorization No. 2018-004.doc 108 Indian River County Department of Utilities CONSTRUCTION BUDGET- Labor Contract & Direct Purchase Project: 12th Street SW Water Service Replacement (Vero Highlands) By: John M. Boyer, P.E. Date: June 31, 2018 Attachment 2 LABOR COSTS MATERIAL COSTS (IRC Direct Purchase) Bid Item No. Bid Item Description Estimated Quantity Unit of Measure Labor Unit Price Total Labor Price Material Unit Price Total Material Price 18k Install Water Service -Double Long with meterand box (more than 50 ft) 1 EA $450.00 $450.00 $1,169.70 $1,169.70 181 Install 2" PVC Service Casing 1 EA $400.00 $400.00 $25.00 $25.00 18i Install Water Service Double Long with 2" Saddle and Corp Stop at Main (Abandon Existing Service) 1 EA. $600.00 $600.00 $26.00 $26.00 26b Install or Replace Existing Service Meters (Conned Customer -Side Plumbing) 1 EA $250.00 $250.00 $100.00 $100.00 86a Lawn Restoration (Topsoil & Sod) Includes Watering SO SY $2.25 $112.50 $2.75 $137.50 91 Mobilization, Demobilization, MOT (based on 10% Labor Cost): 1 LS $200.00 $200.00 $0.00 $0.00 Subtotals: Labor: $2,012.50 Material: $1,458.20 Contingency: 5% $100.63 5% $72.91 Labor: $2,113.13 Material: $1,531.11 TOTAL CONSTRUCrION COST: $3,644.24 FDEP PERMIT FEE: n/P ____.EngDesign (by Staff): -----n/r Geotechnical Testing: Or Stake -Out & As -Built Survey (by Staff): n/r TOTAL PROJECT BUDGET: $3,644.24 F:\Utilities\UTILITY.- Eagineering�Prcjects-Capital Projects\18-05212325.12th St SMCost Estimate- lith Street SW.xisx 109 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA MEMORANDUM TO: Jason E. Brown, County Administrator THROUGH: Richard B. Szpyrka, P.E., Public Works Director FROM: Manny Cabo, Telecommunications Manager SUBJECT: IRC Courthouse - Proposed new Comcast ISP Service for WIFI and Cellular Signal Extender DATE: June 12, 2018 BACKGROUND IRC Telecommunications recently received a request from Indian River County Sheriff's Office - Judicial Services Unit at IRC Courthouse, to look into options for improving cellular signal coverage in the vicinity of IRC Courthouse - Security Central Office. This is the main operations center for all security / public safety surveillance systems at Indian River County Courthouse. Cellular signal coverage for AT&T cellular telephones at this location is currently acceptable, but cellular signal coverage for Verizon cellular telephones is currently relatively nonexistent. This is in effect, a cellular dead spot for Verizon cellular signal / coverage. IRC Telecommunications was able to negotiate with Verizon Wireless Inc. to provide a Verizon cellular signal repeater unit (Femtocell device) at no cost to the County, primarily for use by IRCSO Security personnel at IRC Courthouse. This Cellular service can also function as a backup to IRCSO radio systems at IRC Courthouse, in the event of an emergency or a Courthouse radio systems failure condition, for Verizon user cellular telephones. In order for the new Verizon cellular signal repeater to function, a local ISP/WIFI network connection is required The Verizon Femtocell is not programmable only for use by specific County / IRCSO cellphones. The Verizon Femtocell device requires public WIFI for optimal use. County could not configure this new Femtocell device on the existing IRC Courthouse corporate network, as it would open the IRC network to public cellular access use, which is unacceptable. ANALYSIS IRC Courthouse currently has limited Comcast ISP (Internet Service Provider) public WIFI service, which was primarily installed for use by attorneys, public defenders, and IRC Courthouse Judges, with minimal public access. This public WIFI service was installed and paid for by the Florida BAR Association. The current bandwidth of this Comcast ISP service is 75 Meg. This Comcast ISP service currently costs Florida BAR Association $150.00 per month. It is estimated that the bandwidth required for the new Verizon Femtocell is optimally 20 Meg. Adding this device to the 110 Page 2 of 2 IRC Courthouse - Proposed new Comcast ISP Service for WIN and Cellular Signal Extender BCC Agenda Item for June 19, 2018 existing 75 Meg - Florida BAR / Comcast ISP service would severely restrict available network bandwidth. IRC Telecommunications was able to negotiate a proposal with Comcast Inc. for 250 meg ISP/WIFI service at IRC Courthouse, using the existing WIFI systems hardware at a $150.00 per month discounted rate. Total recurring monthly cost for this Comcast ISP service would.be $214.90. There is also a one-time $199.00 fee for the new IRC / Comcast ISP service installation at IRC Courthouse site. The current offer from Comcast for this service expires on June 21st 2018. For the past several years, the Indian River Bar Association has been paying to have wifi internet connection in the courtrooms for the benefit of the judges and attorneys. Staff contacted the Bar Association's Board of Directors who agreed to have the upgrades made to the existing system and will continue to contribute $125 per month toward the cost of the new system. The Bar Association will make an annual payment or a monthly payment, whichever the Budget or Finance office recommends. li ►11 IMIT1 ] Funding.for the Comcast 250 Meg ISP Service at IRC Courthouse is available in Facilities Management, Other Contractual Services, 00122019-033490. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of the proposed conversion of the existing Florida BAR Association 75 Meg IPS / public WIFI service at IRC Courthouse, to the new IRC 250 Meg ISP / public WIFI service, at the greatly discounted rate. Staff recommends the approval of the Florida BAR Associations offered to contribute $125.00 per month toward the recurring monthly cost for this service for the Courthouse. Staff recommends approval for the Public Works Director to sign the attached agreement on behalf of the County. ATTACHMFNT Proposal / Agreement from Comcast Inc. for new 250 Meg ISP Service at IRC Courthouse. APPROVED AGENDA ITEM FOR JUNE 19, 2018 111 C:\Users\legistar\AppData\Local\Temp\BCL Tech nologies\easyPDF 8\@BCL@OC1 D342B\@BCL@0C1 D342B.docx COMCAST BUSINESS SERVICE ORDER AGREEMENT BUSINESS till Feature Voice Lines Account Name: Indian River County IT ID#: 19578180 CUSTOMER INFORMATION (Service Location) Address 1 2000 16TH AVE City VERO BEACH Address 2 State FL Primary Contact Name Manny Cabo ZIP Code 32960 Business Phone (772) 226-1000 County Cell Phone Email Address mcabo@ircgov.com Pager Number Primary Fax Number Technical Contact Name Tech Contact On -Site? No Technical Contact Business Phone Technical Contact Email Property Manager Contact Name Property Mgr. Phone Selection COMCAST BUSINESS SERVICES Business Voice I Business Voice Edge Business Internet X Business TV Service Term (Months) 24 COMCAST BUSINESS SERVICES DETAILS Business Voice* VOICE SELECTIONS Quantity Unit Cost Total Cost till Feature Voice Lines 0 + Lines Total Price(NRC) Basic Lines 0 oil Free Numbers $0.00 ax Lines $0.00 Equipment Fee 0 1 VOICE OPTIONS Selectton(X) Total Cost oicemail 0 Cordless Deskphone 0 Enhanced Listings $0.00 Auto -Attendant $0.00 * Voice offers & options not available in all markets. VoiceEdae Select Selections* %.vmcasc cusmess r-acrcages Package Name: CEN SP $199.95D250_2yr PACKAGE DESCRIPTION $150 MRC Discount off Deluxe 250 Business Internet for discounted rate of $199.95. MRC Discounts roll to rate card in month 25. 2 year term required. Taxes, -Usage, Fees, and Equipment are extra. Voice Selections Quantity Unit Price(MRC) Total Price(MRC) Unit Price(NRC) Total Price(NRC) VoiceEdge Select Seats 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Cordless Handset 0 1 $4.95 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Cordless Deskphone 0 $4.95 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 *Bundle include : Auto attendant. Hunt Group and Base station. Business Internet* Business TV*** INTERNET SELECTIONS Selection(X) Total Cost TV SELECTIONS Selection Total Cost Speed - Deluxe 250 Equipment Fee X X $349.95 $14.95 HD Technology Fee *Business Internet speed tier selections not available In all markets. 'Internet selections & options not available In all markets. - INTERNET OPTIONS Selection(X) Total Cost Static IP V4/V6 Wi-Fi - Business Wifi Standard X $0.00 TV OPTIONS Selection Total Cost Sports Pack** Canales Selecto Music Choice W/Comcast Business TV Other Other TV CONFIGURATION DETAILS Quantity Unit Cost Total Cost 0 $0.00 $0.00 TV Box + Remote TV Adaptor 0 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 mini mDTA/mDTA Type # of Outlets NRC MRC n.mcor pnva[e wew salamianments. I v a options not avaname In an marxers. I,ustomer acxnowleages and understands uustomef may be responsible for additional music licensing or copyright fees for music contained in any or all of the Services, Including, but not limited to Video and/or Public View Video. "Available as add-on to Digital Standard & Digital Deluxe N Selections only. 112 OrderForm Version v45 Page 1 of 5 COMCAST BUSINESS SERVICE ORDER AGREEMENT BUSINESS Account Name: Indian River County IT Business Voice Edge ID#:19578180 Voice Selections Quantity Unit Price(MRC) Total Price(MRC) Unit Price(NRC) Total Price(NRC) Unified Communication Seats Lines(price included with seats) Additional Voicemail Box Tollfree Number(s) (plus usage) Remote Call Forward Directory Listing - null Government/School Listing Customer Equipment Panasonic TGP600 Smart IP Cordless Phone Base Station Panasonic TPA60 Smart IP Cordless Handset Panasonic TPA65 Smart IP Cordless Desk hone Panasonic KX-A406 Cordless Repeater Voice Gateway Total COMCAST BUSINESS TOTAL SERVICE CHARGES Comcast Business Selection(X) Quantity Unit Cost Total Cost Total Monthly Service Charge 1 $364.90 usiness Internet/IV/Voice Installation Fee X $199.00 $199.001 Promotional Code (if applicable) Discount On Internet 150.00 (if applicable) Discount On Video (if applicable) Discount On Voice life plicable) Discount voiceEdge Select Seaatt s Dice Activation Fee` uto-Attendant Setup Fee oil Free Activation Fee irectory Listing Suppression Fee oiceEdge Toll Free Activation Fee oiceEdge Directory Listing Suppression Fee oiceEdge Seat Setup Fee oiceEdge Select Seat Activation Fee" • Per line activation fee, up to four (4) line maximum charge. (if applicable) "Bundle includes: Auto attendant, Hunt Group and Base Station. Discount On VoiceEdge (if applicable) Total Discount $150.00 Total Recurring Monthly Bill: $zla.so Total Installation Charges:* $199.00 Applicable federal, state, and local taxes and as may apply. • Does not include Custom Installation Fees. I GENERAL SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS I OrderForm Version v45 Page 2 of 5 COMCAST BUSINESS SERVICE ORDER AGREEMENT BUSINESS Account Name: Indian River County IT ID#:19578180 COMCAST BUSINESS INTERNET CONFIGURATION DETAILS ransfer Existing Comcast.net Email INo Equipment Selection I Business Wireless umber of Static IPs' Business Web Hosting lNo COMCAST BUSINESS TV CONFIGURATION DETAILS Outlet Details Location Outlet Type Outlet 1 - Primary Outlet 2 - Additional Outlet 3 - Additional Outlet 4 - Additional Outlet 5 - Additional Outlet 6 - Additional Outlet 7 - Additional Outlet 8 - Additional Additional Comments: OUTLETS 9 & UP QUANTITY TV Box + Remote 0 TV Adaptor 0 COMCAST BUSINESS VOICEEDGE SELECT CONFIGURATION DETAILS COMCAST BUSINESS VOICE CONFIGURATION DETAILS Phone # Type Voicemail Customer Equipment Phone System Type Key System, PBX, Other Phone System Manufacturer Fax Machine Manufacturer Alarm System Vendor Point of Sale Device Telco Closet Location Hunt Group Configuration Details Hunt Group Features Requested Yes/No Hunt Group Configuration Type Hunt Group Pilot Number 114 OrderForm Version v45 Page 3 of 5 COMCAST BUSINESS SERVICE ORDER AGREEMENT BUSINESS Account Name: Indian River County IT . Toll Free # Calling Origination Area Associated TN Directory Listing Details Directory Listing (Pubf he , N.I.b shm, wnstea) Directory Listing Phone Number Directory Listing Display Name DA/DL Header Text Information DA/DL Header Code Information Standard Industry Code Information Additional Voice Details Caller ID (Yes/No) Caller ID Display Name (max 15 char.) International Dialing (Yes/No) No Call Blocking (Yes/No) Auto -Attendant (Yes/No) No COMCAST BUSINESS VOICE EDGE CONFIGURATION DETAILS Voice Edge Directory Listing Details Directory Listing (Pubhs5 .Noe uhnshW.umkte) Directory Listing Phone Number Directory Listing Display Name DA/DL Header Text Information DA/DL Header Code Information Voice Edge Additional Voice Details Caller ID (Yes/No) International Dialing (Yes/No) Caller ID Display Name (max 15 characters) Call Blocking (Yes/No) Enterprise Extension Dialing? ID#:19578180 115 OrderForm Version v45 Page 4 of 5 COMCAST BUSINESS SERVICE ORDER AGREEMENT BUSINESS Account Name: Indian River County IT ID#: 19578180 CUSTOMER BILLING INFORMATION Billing Account Name Indian River County IT City VERO BEACH Billing Name (3rd Party Accounts) Slate FL Address 1 200016TH AVE ZIP Code 32960 Address 2 Billing Contact Email mcabo@ircgov.com Billing Contact Name Manny Cabo Billing Contact Phone (772) 226-1000 Tax Exempt?* ' Yes Billing Fax Number * If yes, please provide and attach tax exemption certificate. AGREEMENT 1. This Comcast Business Service Order Agreement sets forth the terms and conditions under which Comcast Cable Communications Management, LLC and its operating affiliates ("Comcast") will provide the Services to Customer. This Comcast Business Service Order Agreement consists of this document ("SOA"), the standard Comcast Business Terms and Conditions ('Terms and Conditions"), and any jointly executed amendments ("Amendments") entered under the Agreement. In the event of inconsistency among these documents, precedence will be as follows: (1) Amendments, (2) Terms and Conditions, and (3) this SOA. This Agreement shall commence and become a legally binding agreement upon Customer's execution of the SOA. The Agreement shall terminate as set forth in the Terms and Conditions (http://business.comcast.cdm/terms-conditions/index.aspx). All capitalized terms not defined in this SOA shall reflect the definitions given to them in the Terms and Conditions. Use of the Services is also subject to the then current High -Speed Internet for Business Acceptable Use Policy located at http://business.comcast.com/terms-conditions/index.aspx (or any successor URL), and the then current High -Speed Internet for Business Privacy Policy located at http://business.comcast.com/terms-conditions/index.aspx (or any successor URL), both of which Comcast may update from time to time. 2. Comcast Business Voice, Internet, TV, and Comcast Business SmartOffice' Services ("Service") carry a 30 day* money back guarantee**. If, within the first 30 days following Service installation, Customer is not completely satisfied, Customer may cancel Service and Comcast will issue a refund for the monthly recurring fee paid for the first 30 days of service, excluding installation charges, fees, taxes and voice usage charges, however, Customer will be charged any remaining payments owed for non-refundable fees (including installation) and other charges. In order to be eligible for the refund, Customer must cancel Service within 30 days after installation and return any Comcast - provided equipment in good working order. In no event shall the refund exceed $500.00. *Comcast Business Trunks and Comcast Business VoiceEdge' carry a 60 day money back guarantee, subject to the above terms. **The money back guarantee does not apply to Hospitality Video or Ethernet Services. 3. To complete a Voice order, Customer must execute a Comcast Letter or Authorization ("LOA") and submit it to Comcast, or Comcast's third party order entry integrator, as directed by Comcast. 4. New telephone numbers are subject to change prior to the install. Customers should not print their new number on stationery or cards until after the install is complete. 5. Modifications: All modifications to the Agreement, if any, must be captured in a written Amendment, executed by an authorized Comcast Senior Vice President and the Customer. All other attempts to modify the Agreement shall be void and non-binding on Comcast. Customer by signing below, agrees and accepts the Terms and Conditions of this Agreement. 6. IF CUSTOMER IS SUBSCRIBING TO COMCAST'S BUSINESS DIGITAL VOICE SERVICE, CUSTOMER, BY SIGNING BELOW, ACKNOWLEDGES RECEIPT AND UNDERSTANDING OF THE FOLLOWING 911 NOTICE: 911 NOTICE Comcast Business Digital Voice service ("Voice Service") may have the 911 limitations specified below: • In order for 911 calls to be properly directed to emergency services using Voice Service, Comcast must have the correct service address for the telephone number used by the Company. If the Voice Service or any Voice Service device is moved to a different location without Company providing an updated service address, 911 calls may be directed to the wrong emergency authority, may transmit the wrong address, and/or Voice Service (including 911) may fail altogether. Customer's use of a telephone number not associated with its geographic location may also increase these risks. • The Voice Service uses electrical power in the Company's premises. If there is an electrical power outage, 911 calling may be interrupted if a battery back-up is not installed in the voice modem, fails, or is exhausted. • Calls using the Voice Service, including calls to 911, may not be completed if there is a problem with network facilities, including network congestion, network/equipment/power failure, a broadband connection failure, or another technical problem. • Customer should call Comcast at 1-888-824-8104 if it has any questions or needs to update a service address in the 911 system. Delays in updating the service address may also impact 911. BY SIGNING BELOW, CUSTOMER ACKNOWLEDGES THAT IT HAS READ AND UNDERSTANDS THE FOREGOING 911 NOTICE AND THE 911 LIMITATIONS OF THE VOICE SERVICE. CUSTOMER SIGNATURE By signing below, Customer agrees and accepts the Terms and Conditions of this Agreement. General Terms and Conditions can be found at http://business.comrast.com/terms-conditionsAndex.aspx. Signature: Print: Title: Dale: I FOR COMCAST USE ONLY I Sales Representative: Debra Isbell Sales Representative Code: 951 Sales Manager/Director Name: Sean Forfar Sales Manager/Director Approval: Division: Central SmartOffice License Number: 116 OrderForm Version v45 Page 5 of 5 M N June 19, 2018 ITEM 8 Consent INDIAN RIVER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS INTER -OFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: Members of the Board of County Commissioners DATE: June 12, 2018 SUBJECT: TCRPC COVB Appointment of Councilwoman Moss FROM: Peter O'Bryan Commissioner, District 4 The attached letter from Mayor Howle requests approval of Councilwoman Moss as. the City of Vero Beach's appointment to the Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council. 117 City of Tlero Beach h 1053 - 20th PLACE - P.O. BOX 1389 'VITRO BEACH, FLORIDA 32961-3389 Telephone: (772) 978-4700 • Fax- (7M 978-4:790 OFFICE- OF THE MAYOR June 6, 2018 Mr. Peter O'Bryan, Chairman Indian River County Commission 1801 27`h Street Vero Beach, Florida 32960 RE: Treasure Coast Regional. Planning Council Appointment Dear Chairman O'Bryan: JUN 12 2018 BO-AR.13 OF COU.Ni Ty COMMISSION hc',r : r,t•��: fnt�• q S`n�`4: fit"'". ^ >'t�•{r, CM OW i Pa_ ; a. W;}' The City of Vero Beach would respectfully request that you approve the appointment of Councilwoman Laura Moss to sit on the Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council. Councilmember Tony Young was originally appointed to serve on the TCRPC, but because of some commitments that he has he is unable to make the meetings and Councilwoman Moss has agreed to serve in his place. Thank you for your consideration in this matter. Sincerely, } 6. //JHj/a/rry Owl e, Mayor City of Vero Beach HH/tb 118 �D Office 0, f Con,ont Agenda 06/19/18 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY ATTORNEY Dylan Reingold, County Attorney William K. DeBraal, Deputy County Attorney Kate Pingolt Cotner, Assistant County Attorney MEMORANDUM TO: Board of County Commissioners FROM: William K. DeBraal, Deputy County Attorney DATE: June 13, 2018 1V SUBJECT: Request for Amended Access. Easement to Datapath Tower, LLC for former Emergency Services Tower You may recall the former County jail property at 1725 17th Street was surplused and divided between the Boys & Girls Club and St. Francis Manor and portions of the property were added to their respective leases with the County. The 150 foot guyed tower at the old jail site was not made part of those leases and remained County property until July 5, 2016, when the Board approved sale of the tower site to Datapath Tower LLC for $175,680.00. At that time, Datapath planned to rehab and update the tower to allow for additional antennae arrays to be co -located on the tower. Since that time, Datapath has changed its plans and has applied to the City of Vero Beach to construct a new monopole tower on the site. No guy wires will be needed for the new tower. The change in plans necessitates four new documents: 1. Since a new tower will be constructed, the footprint of the tower will expand slightly together with the City requirement of a landscape buffer around the base of the tower site. Datapath seeks an additional 10 foot Utility Equipment and Landscape Easement around the existing fence in order to accommodate for additional equipment and compliance with City code. The Utility Equipment and Landscape Easement is attached as Exhibit "A". 2. The proposed new tower will not require guy wires and therefore the property underneath the guy wires is not needed and will be returned to the County by Datapath. The Special Warranty Deed to the County is attached as Exhibit "B". 3. In order to provide for construction of the new tower, Datapath has requested a different access easement. The existing access easement granted to Datapath at closing is not sufficient for maneuvering of heavy equipment during construction of the new tower. The New Access and Parking/Turnaround Easement is attached as Exhibit "C". 4. Finally, the City has requested a formal Utility Easement be recorded as part of the site plan approval process. The existing electric lines that have served the tower have been in the same location for years, but were never described in a recorded easement. The 10 Foot Wide Utility Easement satisfies the City's request for a formal Utility Easement and is attached as Exhibit "D". 119 Datapath Amended Easements June 13, 2018 Page 2 The proposed easements, deed and legal descriptions attached to this memo have been reviewed and approved by the County Surveyor. Signed and sealed sketches and legal descriptions will accompany the original documents. When the County conveyed the former jail site to the Boys and Girls Club and St. Francis Manor, it retained ownership of the tower site so neither of those entities will be impacted by the new easements. The returned guy wire parcels may allow St. Francis Manor to construct additional apartments on their current leased property. Funding: There is no expenditure of County funds for this matter. Datapath will pay for the cost of recording the deed and the easements. Recommendation: Staff recommends that the Board approve the easements to Datapath Towers, LLC and authorize the Chairman to execute the easements on behalf of the Board. Copes to: Datapath Tower Attachments: Utility Equipment Easement is attached as Exhibit "A" Special Warranty deed for guy wires is attached as Exhibit "B" New Access and Parking/Turnaround Easement is attached as Exhibit "C". Utility Easement and is attached as Exhibit "Dn 120 .1EXH> B i This document was prepared by: Indian River County Attorney's Office 1801 27th Street Vero Beach, FL 32960 (772) 226-1425 UTILITY EQUIPMENT AND LANDSCAPE EASEMENT THIS GRANT OF EASEMENT, made and executed this day of , 2018, by INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, having a mailing address of 1801 27th Street, Vero Beach, Florida, 32960, hereinafter called GRANTOR and DATAPATH TOWER, LLC, a Florida limited liability company, whose mailing address is 200 Central Avenue, St. Petersburg, Florida 33701, hereinafter called GRANTEE. WITNESSETH: That GRANTOR for and in consideration of the sum of TEN DOLLARS ($10.00) and other valuable consideration, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged by these presents does grant, bargain, sell, alien, remise, release, convey, and confirm unto the GRANTEE, a perpetual easement for placement and storage of utility equipment and landscaping over, across, and beneath the following described land, situate in Indian River County, Florida, with the maintenance responsibility being the responsibility of Grantee, to -wit: See Exhibit "A" attached hereto. And GRANTOR hereby covenants with said GRANTEE that the GRANTOR is lawfully seized of said servient land in fee simple, and that the GRANTOR has good right and lawful authority to convey the easement established hereby and will defend the same against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the GRANTOR has hereunto set its hand and seal the day and year first above written. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA BY: Peter D. O'Bryan, Chairman Date BCC Approved: Approved: By Jason E. Brown County Administrator Attest: Jeffrey R. Smith, Clerk of Court And Comptroller By: Deputy Clerk Approved as to form and legal sufficiency William K. DeBraal Deputy County Attorney 121 LU o foo M 2 2 U 2 O0 O w t w O O p LL mjF O N N j 0 W LLOp W ¢ U U < F n�rm ¢LLyv� W ul K p WO 2 Oen a+UZ Lu m w p Z oag'a�rr Fz � w < — -z n¢ p LL LL R2¢�� O Zf-z�0 W O 2 U m;�¢8N� p�jOz�p m o W W co � c, �zpmF'b �Wzzw`r Z>LL �°o04x�o' 0 O¢ = - K O O 0,0Z=-- , m Z W z p U N¢�z¢laii _Z cDwo�<<Fo ?mp W f'm mO M w p W sc —0 N m = e= -OUZO o va 0 O LL }r J U p w O LU LU U ? O cr co co Z 0 m r• O Z rrN W cn ig U Z CV Lu o to W U O U UW co <0w Y � LL O W L, O C, W W d O O U S N p Z � a � � O U z W co D W Z z O LuQ N U` d Y W cocn LU 2 S E2 z s p U¢ P m J °. w O LLI cxoa to n V Z 0 z OG p Z a a LU 5 WUU V=co dW Lu O Z O z' s �io t0NWA ?0?..�7� Zc¢8� us ���•+LLZ O U FEW? <O��Z �• /�I En�mo�wa��o �so8o�w�oa� �s�� LL $ a LL 1y�� 1 }p m cs 04 i® r ®O I F� YF� �vvE OO Qom{} ®® ��Q 2 Z Ci g N Q O S ZK N6TU � KAT � �'L zo o zF� Zzy w � pp VJ w � w No o �¢ ��FQ¢�~u1IIm NowEp z � zz z¢prmi,�LLp1 0� o N O t� FY- Z U a 0q Ni U y N O Q O y p¢� O K 2 2 V¢¢ QO F Z W S =o a 3 Gi $ z y Q o Q q J "m 2 a a a W Z LL O 2 0 m G g U O p d W � T _z t� �-xO-Os OLLOJz 3 `CK v n. o a ui udN F o aptn ciuOou�� zzc2.� FoLLo z! N W O gggg....IIII O d � (n Q O7n N W 2 ��O UQO �O Q �g2La Y �O W 20a r.1� j3; a w LIEti gS jO z .s uj ujd �LLF-RHK WW¢ Q LL LL tem z�w �N+o LLwOnw x>c� ALLY z OO Cp C 2 7 mU w c� p W m F- F Owag 2o� aWow4 O>Q W< xZ OipnoOgFoQILLW� 2a Nd 2 F N cg NOiEZWZ�L %0 R-MzOpR au zco U ZF c'i O „Qo pw Qaw moW pQ�¢ooaLe�i{o}� ¢ K W QS zHo wU F2 z"p o_z KtV-AZ V 1-yG ppp w Z F - Z S OLL Q 6 S N Z w 0 l i JNJ(( O a O LL W O W �Z U C N V W LL z e e y O 2 W J W U C K W_ y �C O W K W=U2� Q �O/ W O W z W O m c Z W Y LL W W O 6K 98R8,'-8 Q N LL O W H- 1- C Q m W N = LL W p zF� 3� =ui? ww sz8--5- oa$d _waZ>26P"�0 ocoiz o{+�� r'yi O p Z YO �m W T W Z2 W p2>� Zd 2���ii..LL� p -� 061- may igaSi' ¢ Wp oQ Q co Q U m O p S O N 0 O O Z? m 2 S F Z K N~ O UN m~ W Wo N^ t_n U U U QOt=FFZ--1{{YLL� OO �TN W OJ OJp W W zp N LUN ¢Z W G Z�22 W T> N W 6m�KC�'K Ir pLLLL N.�.O VJVJJ Z W O Q K W Z O m W O Z> Z S LL p 3 Z LL W r N O 2 O S U 2 W U U W pw z��w > Foz¢ SF- RW �1'So ��z L"LL a wo¢�N�o z�7��o a4=c o�¢¢uz7 ��w ma o QULL4. . W .1 eGUUa Gam! 1i p.ti 5z d.w .O0 B2X�2 W m ® � �- 4 Q R! Lou LuO W W ♦� Q VJ � Z w 4' T g g _ �09O IJLJ�i / z�- � Z N n z a m V L1.! dZ N O W Vi 0 LU \ 3 \ U a $ I� ¢ r qq a am od X908 _ �_w 11.._ -� — s _ — (al _ •oe � „8.. �8�2iVd — o — — — — � � � i — a < .00 ev (a sztici 3 tr£,zo.00 n� N 1cc az p N o � w M �� N O ~�.� 17; OGeFQ� � d'Om pd o� G Z 3Vo O� n U{�# C4 C pOfj U N y 3 t0 Z W N W Z M O Z rn -iM rn WEU = W 3 a F o m 0 o W W TL J Cl) U � o W UN TI O a a ® F- o � I WAS w Qf CO Z O a Z � w O d 0 m U 2 ¢ W p o CD z N o ' 3" 4102 C, z x x w L5 :w to l/) W F- I- !- M „6£,20.00 N (SISVB ONIUV38) (O,SL'O£L 3 .t L,90.00 N ® O sural r msuzrelws wesx s.iw This document was prepared by: �. ..� .. Indian River County Attorney's Office 180127 1h Streett § 9 Vero Beach, FL 32960 EXHII 5 e f SPECIAL WARRANTY DEED THIS DEED, made on the day of , 2018 between DATAPATH TOWER, LLC, a Florida limited liability company, whose mailing address is 200 Central Avenue, St. Petersburg, Florida 323701, and INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Florida (GRANTEE), whose mailing address is 1801 271h Street, Vero Beach, Florida 32960, WITNESSETH, that GRANTOR, for and in consideration of the sum of TEN DOLLARS ($10.00), and other good and valuable consideration to GRANTOR in hand paid by GRANTEE, the receipt of which is acknowledged, conveys to GRANTEE and GRANTEE'S administrators and assigns forever the following described land situated in Indian River County, Florida, more particularly described as: See Exhibit "A" attached and Incorporated herein by reference. And GRANTOR covenants with GRANTEE that, except as noted, at the time of the delivery of this deed: 1. The premises are free from all encumbrances made by GRANTOR, except as follows: NONE ` 2. GRANTOR will warrant and defend against the lawful claims and demands of all persons claiming by, through, or under GRANTOR, but against none other. Signed in the presence of the DATAPATH TOWER, LLC following witnesses: sign: print sign:. print: STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF By:_ Title: Acknowledged before me this day of , 2018 by , as of Datapath Tower LLC, a Florida Limited Liability Company, with full authorization from its 1 125 board, who is either personally known to me or has produced (driver's license/passport) as identification. SEAL: NOTARY PUBLIC: sign: print: Commission No.: Commission Expiration: N 126 � a g C:: �— Z ,rlwMYfBs `=�% LL O U uj U, LL. U � *mLLJ co aZz LOLA Z z µyJ U Z QyU (n I_ ¢ r• U T. GZ N O w zwc9r^ v �uoazm4cd mzw$o �zwLL O ��i1 = Q ,Z C-F C m K O 1' W LL W O� LL- U LL �o uaoowwF � ozFzuwi '�'r�5w¢u�6na wz�jo 4iwo OU 5 U to U QZ�.0 UV. v u9Z O wz�-rub ww .N��NU' O Z rzp¢U LL�Owy b��3 F- F- U w N US, 00o mO wca¢w�z wca�Nm c7 aom wW Oo^TUm ��r 0 2 Q ci to LL-p z rx x �moaazF-^O Ooz UUw Swo W a. F- coQ C7 W 8 Oy U J r°d' ow¢ac7 yyu'o"' ZliJ�m¢LLS ¢�en $x'' �F LLO li d Y O ���aJJ im g Z W Np K¢S UO Z� Ow W C�7�u SLL �r U mzo O Nr W ocs �� LU oo fi�t!++ o,i,r�au�zo"oRzNoF�+aLL+�+'+^ogww oJ�� z'""° w o o"a mai 5¢�zo��o�jLLozSN$w¢z5�esi�ou�¢�� ��WLLw c�o� U ? D Amo TS o w�oozow z Uv�-zo�F ^�w�" o WZZ �`d� z�rmowm mr�oa�wrm colo oo.nU €z OO- p wKgy¢N OU �F- V OZOwJ p$UF- Ju. p} w wFi'ip0 W o ¢N y Z � m00 ¢IS---`�O W midi �LL' Vf W Z�ZOt�t 'nOmw y W Yt9Z [Cm^ ZZ �jj �„� py O E Noo A D-tpNi �Q tiimv 5zazcojwN��Fmcwiwcwi�a L��i'lwF�i$�n� i�p0 nri� ��u¢7� � �>ii N�tf H� �s¢ 2J�oNT��'• OU W f�7 W m2 �SOZ �Z N 0�wp m ¢02Z r^- J[N-; Ly cej 0 F2 Km LL N W K� O W gd ZF Z�� W N W ZS pUU. 1-�� 4.LL�U O Uw 1 �}z�` uri u0i a xo�z� in ¢v��++>T xwx W wm zw�iis z� a ¢ovv�ad ��jj-^zw {Q�J' d2 O r NLLF'0o w W z0�0 ZN(0.7 Fgo`�i���nOiJUZ � CIO W wN0 CN=1S- ] W. o UJ O 2Z N W 0R0�LL�Z KZ�2F-rjUZ ¢0 am 00g � w O O �a �- �¢y1 xxm�0 � m¢LLw x O ^ uio �j N W V ¢C W w W O KtWj tw-FOSpp F-¢LL W Km�Z S N�1LL W W K mQ Z Z �m ti r Z W O 7 J N J LL W zz �¢a owzoxNou�c'�6mwo�uz��� �r3o� o�zmz Nus. oZ cry y� y � (.9LLT zN c7 wa zNm o zo¢cW,��i cwiz 2 W wv �a� r� �ohLiw�¢aur-a�u%"i oN�i�g �i`c vwi�xU' �w ou7w�� .��iw ohm �e C7 SY�i � aw ¢W ¢'u5".�t1¢ z rW oow v 2 .oc>zoW e� N�7S j OD.-.Ni W W KLL(.� qOZ W = W D LLd' W W T U N06ii1 wLL¢O UYKQQQz �z¢W'Wo��o��zaLLw?N{CuNf�i'$�purz z �WWp�frfr. OU jam= UZZU� 1F 0 �� CALL NQZ C�7N z COmm- yOtria W W � K�Z � W ��� _311 pp V Z2�2 W p���O� W ¢ �¢ 2 NULL W W IS- t. oz U WZ ' LL LL Z d a Cw7 W ¢ d OO ¢rQU�Oy�� � � Z ULL twi.��g FSS rr� 6 c�i KM �O ¢ Or �H ¢ LL W FSS H:, -oa�LL �1.1 wr"i K ¢r 5 J OU y JO zu_z o }X QZN ugc�zw.LL��o�J4-nr S w¢ ssm oo moz30o p� oui o O wmo wmr cw.'S lnwo z imwmut� z ¢pinzwmOwh x +k-a z"N�^ wLL SJLL z moa �N m3 mo v¢ioFz W ¢cOJ o �LLoZ Opts zmww iii `gw ¢p W o gzm¢o z pUw O W =0 W �" ZO w rQmQaU W NJJX 6N �wN�S+a UO-�d �.., mp p2.. p. {ny�.7Z0.2 O =. W w m SZS O O x W O W w W O N LL W Z LL 2 QQ 6 LL Jx� 2 W LL Z O Q¢ F Q zO N F N C- z a O W¢ O ti W p 0 0 m r M S g O'Q U LL= y O lL 0 0¢ m w m O $r W m Y Z mZJ d¢z�p {N{�1lZ °22�(7 aL-ZOZWNy�(J000 ZWLLOZ U) r O Z wr O u. U O K^ Z w¢ rc� O Z N Z J 0 z m W ¢ mx (J r xr 0r 0m Z �ci xu� z8�o¢i ^ o ww¢a w� m¢z u� womN Op LLOLL z¢z-w c�z rw-¢�n LL°-o `moo m oma. ovo'ioc� N�wx¢m WLL ¢LL c� oow tom gWz�'�m�0p, L V ¢O 0- 0, �ym mWz¢aNo w o 00 m o r o- w w >LLww N O U m z r Z$¢ S '00 m O U¢ W p V- w Z S- g Q m¢ m ua 0O N cogo��o o a¢ ¢Su�ZFn ozd ¢ x C ¢w 1r-�xLL ULLIFzz z zn.v i- za U ¢xams+w w ¢J d W e w 0 W 60�Z gNKtJOnr LLK SSfXtnZ �S K�¢yQrzOz OLLjO� ¢IS- W yU QOQKOOZ2' w O o HOV LL Gm amJLLhZ> W NOU t�y ZLL W FS T LL OLL� LL�LLZa i2- U � Z � 0 J z a o E2 m U Z Q W N uj O U w i Z Z N Z O c w u U U ria w d � a C/) w w � � �ZCw��6�OZ6i �• OOrH� � �\a ~ i�iG U� S ?f�i ZF 07cxiw Se� ,�, p6NW oW G'1 ?fooww c3oAs U'5z 'Sa SUN �.Ca LU o " :� o Q"'� -OUc GCU LL, ixuj W m s c' ZZU 'Ro m ¢ z Q= M I".. M U N U H .f a4 a U °�U7 'ZppZLU Z � � � � > a � W c� z6 � � opo a � � �o QZ W x W 6 6 N a N 0 0 s ZIU 6 8 000 O8 W 15, F3 0 0 3 C o a v `•' �` > Ed azz v>va aLU W CJ cn LL { U�� Oc " - i a a Ez LU pll! 1} LU 0 N VVV W 1-5 m 11 z-py'y`ti�'v Q W d d � N m z C) C) z- U c -o5-4E y z�8wZ Wz�N �cyw M LLL a o sod- �� �n� aG•O'Z o �w S om g �- o t- rcF 0 o .�-oho' CL R 2 s o � wLL y am AH o o Liu o " " 6 �o >g 3ToH $S W w F- $o o �io��yo3 �oo�'•'`�o o'a g' Qw �yj oa 192 �p �o o o o z5=p u o Q co 0 z rz `2z CD si sga Z3 A oo d �"' 50 � $ +i o g5. t � = R p € Ph a! < � � Lu ¢ � � oip �g��s"-� •n �: `'a ..; LLS a� .-.w�- $ .,sod oo h .a?iEa �d ® Q©® Z syse� n• ms�ua•bs wa u.c a� w 3 3 3 3 w 3 w 3 3 w w 3 C O p � O O O O O N O co moi' `v- N M aH M � N O m O U N 3 w w w w w w w w 3 C O p � O O O O O N O co moi' `v- N M aH M � N O m O U N h N N N M O O N O N Of M O N h N h d- O M Ot N O M t� �'Y M O m N � to � O - 3 w w w w w w w w C O p � O O O O O tf) O co moi' `v- N M N M � N O m O U N h N N N M O O N O N Of M O N h N h d- O M Ot N O M t� �'Y M O cV N to to � O W O N O O o7 of O � tfJ H Z Z N N N Z N Z N N N Z N Z Z Z Z Z Z C � O W � (D t77 O O I� 00 N co � m dam' N M C lt'l J t0 J h J CO J O� J O J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J M F-. w �a— w U¢¢ O Z Y �� �UL.0J V¢¢�U z= E2J $ 0Q I r Yaz G I LL- ®ZUZ N UO Q Q /Z/��rwVY V=N W z x \\ [L-7 yy N \- _o m ,� 69ZZ E)d '908 -e 2�'O v O LL 1} ----W n� �— (a) ,a •Out8..-1302id -- ---- — -- --------- a} (a) ,00' 8v ),6z,14l 3 0. N a o N W i >� zl1 � m -g- - � � jr V .U^.. o m m o z MR =_� i a7 gq' p Z w w 3 d"�m wam dUO [U - o K� N a w d �d )..�Z o� Z wW N o rp NZ(mom� OD N d d Y� W U Ci m O C} O N J� co $cV ai M W 4J <V 'S d 0lljj!1� Z Z '3 x}} WO Oi UZN 'Q� z K Uc 17, 3�o r OZ O U Oo� AZA j w rn O - _ N z Vq] O O o f!! LU W O o Q OJ Z " 8. U {N- F' N W Q a 0 F co LU LU 00 UJ LUcn o ru a =O m � O N U Z ¢ � UW, N p z - WO Oz 3 M �' r o l� O 'BAV 4i0Z O g N ¢N Z F- Lu FU-• O ilii .n le W d U) W W 3 LLJ �(,SL'O£L F- (SISV8 `ONINV38) (O,SL'O£L 3 „v£L,SO.00 ++�p51IL9t b �.OSlP2'8L1c�5 w.f n.[ e. � um DESCRIPTION OF UTILITY EQUIPMENT STRIP PARCEL A TEN FEET WIDE STRIP PARCEL BEING ALONG, ADJACENT, CONTIGUOUS TO AND PARALLEL WITH THE OUTER PERIMETER BOUNDARY OF THE ORIGINAL EXISTING UTILITY EQUIPMENT FENCED AREA OF THAT CERTAIN "TOWER UTILITY PARCEL" DESCRIBED IN THE "COUNTY DEED INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA", ACCORDING TO OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 3002, PAGE 187, PUBLIC RECORDS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA (PARCEL ID. NO. 33390200000700000001.6). THE ABOVE STRIP PARCEL OUTER PERIMETER BOUNDARY BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE POINT OF BEGINNING OF SAID "COUNTY DEED INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA" PARCEL HAVING STATE PLANE COORDINATES OF N:1199899.18 E:849082.79(C) BASED ON NAD83/2007 FLORIDA EAST ZONE 901, RUN SOUTH 53°35'25" EAST A DISTANCE OF 50.95 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; FROM SAID POINT OF BEGINNING HAVING STATE PLANE COORDINATES OF N:l 199868.93 E:849123.79(C) BASED ON NAD83/2007, FLORIDA EAST ZONE 901, RUN NORTH 00022'23" EAST A DISTANCE OF 10.48 FEET; THENCE RUN SOUTH 89031'58" EAST A DISTANCE OF 52.77 FEET; THENCE RUN SOUTH 00056'58" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 46.80 FEET; THENCE RUN NORTH 89°12'30" WEST, A DISTANCE OF52.30 FEET; THENCE RUN NORTH 00°22'23" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 36.02 FEET TO THE POINT OF POINT OF BEGINNING. THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PARCEL CONTAINING 867.16 S.F. S:018-2215 Datapath\Docs\T ega1\DESCRIPTION OF ADDITIONAL 10 FEET UTILITY PACEL.docx 130 DESCRIPTION OF NEW ACCESS AND PARKING / TURN AROUND EASEMENT FOR CELL TOWER SITE A 20.00 FEET WIDE INGRESS AND EGRESS ACCESS EASEMENT WITH A 15.00 FEET WIDE PARKING. / TURN AROUND EASEMENT FOR THE EXISTING CELL TOWER SITE (PARCEL ID. NO. 33390200000700000001.6), LYING IN PART OF SECTION 2, TOWNISHIP 33 SOUTH, RANGE 39 EAST, INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SAID SECTION 2, RUN NORTH 00-05'14" EAST ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID SE 1/4, A DISTANCE OF 730.75 FEET TO THE INTERSECTION OF SAID LINE AND THE WESTERLY EXTENSION OF THE SOUTH LINE OF THE ST. FRANCIS MANOR FACILITY, INDIAN RIVER COUNTY ( PARCEL ID 33390200000700000001.1) AND THE NORTH LINE OF THE INDIAN RIVER COUNTY EMERGENCY DISTRICT (PARCEL ID 33390200000700000001.0); THENCE RUN SOUTH 89025'49" EAST ALONG SAID EXTENSION LINE, A DISTANCE OF 80.00 FEET TO THE EAST RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF 20Tx AVENUE; THENCE CONTINUE SOUTH 89°25'49" EAST ALONG SAID NORTH LINE AND INTO THAT CERTAIN PARCEL OF THE INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, HAVING A PARCEL ID NUMBER OF 33390200000700000001.7, A DISTANCE OF 389.81 FEET; THENCE RUN NORTH 34°02'02" EAST A DISTANCE OF 46.03 FEET; THENCE RUN NORTH 00000'00" EAST INTO THAT CERTAIN PARCEL OF THE INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, HAVING A PARCEL ID NUMBER OF 33390200000700000001.4, A DISTANCE OF 129.77 FEET TO THE SOUTH LINE OF THE NEW UTILITY EQUIPMENT PARCEL OF THE EXISTING CELL TOWER SITE, SAID SOUTH LINE BEING APPROXIMATELY 11.5 FEET SOUTH OF THE EXISTING 8 FEET HIGH CHAINLINK FENCE SURROUNDING THE EXSITING UTILITY EQUIPMENT; THENCE RUN SOUTH 89°12'30" EAST ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE, A DISTANCE OF 52.30 FFET; THENCE RUN SOUTH 00°56'58" WEST A DISTANCE OF 15.00 FEET; THENCE RUN NORTH 89°12'30" WEST A DISTANCE OF 32.05 FEET; THENCE RUN THROUGH SAID INDIAN RIVER COUNTY PARCELS, SOUTH 00°00'00" EAST A DISTANCE OF 120.62 FEET; THENCE RUN SOUTH 34002'02" WEST A DISTANCE OF 62.90 FEET; THENCE RUN NORTH 89025'49" WEST A DISTANCE OF 400.39 FEET TO THE AFORESAID EAST RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF 20' AVENUE; THENCE RUN NORTH 00002'25" EAST ALONG SAID EAST RIGHT OF WAY LINE, A DISTANCE OF 20.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. THE ABOVE DESCRIBED ACCESS AND PARKING EASEMENT CONTAINING 12,125.97 S.F. S:\P115-2215 Datapath\DocsEcgal\DESCRIMON OF NEW ACCESS & PARKING.docx 131 DESCRIPTION OF TEN FEET WIDE UTILITY EASEMENT A. TEN FEET WIDE UTILITY EASEMENT LYING AND BEING IN PART OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 2, TOWNSHIP 33 SOUTH, RANGE 39 EAST, INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA. SAID EASEMENT BEING FIVE FEET EACH SIDE OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED CENTERLINE; COMMENCING AT THE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THAT CERTAIN PARCEL OF LAND DESCRIBED IN "COUNTY DEED INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA" ACCORDING TO OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 3002, PAGE 187 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, HAVING STATE PLANE COORDINATES OF N:1199899.18 E:849082.79(C) BASED ON NAD83/2007, FLORIDA EAST ZONE 901, RUN SOUTH 53°35'25" EAST A DISTANCE OF 50.95 FEET; THENCE RUN NORTH 00°22'23" EAST A DISTANCE OF 10.48 FEET; THENCE RUN SOUTH 89031'58" EAST A DISTANCE OF 52.77 FEET; THENCE RUN SOUTH 00056'58" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 9.90 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THE HEREIN DESCRIBED CENTERLINE; FROM SAID POINT OF BEGINNING HAVING STATE PLANE COORDINATES OF N:1199864.04 E:849176.38(C), BASED ON NAD83/2007, FLORIDA EAST ZONE 901, RUN NORTH 82°4635" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 97.95 FEET TO THE POINT OF TERMINUS, SAID POINT OF TERMINUS BEING 5.00 FEET NORTH 82°46'35" EAST OF AN EXISTING UTILITY POLE OF THE CITY OF VERO BEACH. THE SIDE LINES OF SAID EASEMENT TO BE PROLONGED OR SHORTENED AT ANGLE POINTS AND PARCEL LINES THE ABOVE DESCRIBED EASEMENT WAS CREATED TO SERVE THAT CERTAIN PARCEL OF LAND HAVING A PARCEL ID NO. 33390200000700000001.6 BY THE PROPERTY APPRAISER OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA. SAID DESCRIBED EASEMENT CONTAINING 979.47 S.F. S:\P\18-221SDatapath\Docs\Legal\DESCRIPUON OF 10' WIDE UTILITY EASEMENT.docx 132 DESCRIPTION OF GUY WIRE AND ANCHOR PARCELS THE FIVE FEET WIDE, THREE STRIP PARCELS FOR THE "GUY WIRE AND ANCHORS" OF THAT CERTAIN "TOWER UTILITY PARCEL" DESCRIBED IN THE "COUNTY DEED INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA", ACCORDING TO OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 3002, PAGE 187, PUBLIC RECORDS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA (PARCEL ID. NO. 33390200000700000001.6), SAID FIVE FEET WIDE STRIP PARCELS BEING DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: "A PARCEL OF LAND LYING UPON THE FOLLOWING THREE PARCELS, THE INDIAN RIVER COUNTY EMERGENCY SERVICES DISTRICT PARCEL 'B', AS DESCRIBED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 806, PAGE 2259, ST. FRANCIS MANOR AS DESCRIBED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 516, PAGE 305 AND A PARCEL OWNED BY INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, AS DESCRIBED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS 2651, PAGE 1029: ALL PARCELS LYING IN SECTION 2, TOWNSHIP 33 SOUTH, RANGE 39 EAST AND RECORDED IN THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA; BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS; COMMENCE AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE SE 1/4 OF SAID SECTION 2; THENCE RUN NORTH 00 DEGREES 02 MINUTES 39 SECONDS WEST ALONG THE WEST LINE OF THE SE 1/4 OF SAID SECTION 2, A DISTANCE OF 730.75 FEET TO THE INTERSECTION OF SAID LINE AND THE WESTERLY EXTENSION OF THE SOUTH LINE OF THE AFORESAID ST. FRANCIS MANOR PARCEL; THENCE RUN SOUTH 89 DEGREES 25 MINUTES 35 SECONDS EAST, A DISTANCE OF 80.00 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID ST. FRANCIS MANOR PARCEL, SAID POINT ALSO LYING ON THE EAST RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF 20TH AVENUE; THENCE RUN SOUTH 89 DEGREES 25 MINUTES 35 SECONDS EAST, ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE A DISTANCE OF 373.62 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE AFORESAID ST. FRANCIS MANOR PARCEL; THENCE RUN NORTH 00 DEGREES 10 MINUTES 11 SECONDS EAST ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID ST. FRANCIS MANOR, A DISTANCE OF 60.00 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE AFORESAID INDIAN RIVER COUNTY EMERGENCY SERVICES DISTRICT PARCEL 'B': THENCE RUN NORTH 00 DEGREES 02 MINUTES 34 SECONDS EAST, ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID PARCEL 'B', A DISTANCE OF 174.29 FEET TO A POINT 2.5 FEET SOUTHERLY OF AN EXISTING GUY WIRE FOR A POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE DEPARTING SAID WEST LINE RUN NORTH 53 DEGREES 35 MINUTES 25 SECONDS WEST, 2.5 FEET SOUTHERLY OF AND PARALLEL WITH AN EXISTING WIRE, A DISTANCE OF 28.37 FEET; THENCE RUN NORTH 36 DEGREES 24 MINUTES 35 SECONDS EAST, A DISTANCE OF 5.00 FEET; THENCE RUN SOUTH 53 DEGREES 35 MINUTES 25 SECONDS EAST, 2.5 FEET NORTHEASTERLY OF AND PARALLEL WITH AN EXISTING GUY WIRE, A DISTANCE OF 24.69 FEET TO A POINT ON THE WEST LINE OF SAID PARCEL 'B'; THENCE CONTINUE SOUTH 53 DEGREES 35 MINUTES 25 S:\P\18-221S Datapath\Docs\Legal\DESCRIPTION OF GUY WIRE AND ANCHOR PARCELS.docx 133 SECONDS EAST, A DISTANCE OF 37.26 FEET TO A POINT ON THE EAST LINE OF SAID PARCEL'B'; THENCE CONTINUE SOUTH 53 DEGREES 35 MINUTES 25 SECONDS EAST, A DISTANCE OF 26.10 FEET TO A POINT 1 FOOT WEST OF AN EXISTING 8 FOOT CHAIN LINK FENCE; THENCE RUN NORTH 00 DEGREES 22 MINUTES 23 SECONDS EAST, 1 FOOT WEST OF AND PARALLEL WITH SAID CHAIN LINK FENCE, A DISTANCE OF 1.56 FEET; THENCE RUN SOUTH 89 DEGREES 31 MINUTES 58 SECONDS EAST, 1 FOOT NORTH OF AND PARALLEL WITH SAID CHAIN LINK FENCE, A DISTANCE OF 22.96 FEET NORTHWESTERLY OF AN EXISTING GUY WIRE; THENCE RUN NORTH 64 DEGREES 39 MINUTES 05 SECONDS EAST, 2.5 FEET NORTHWESTERLY OF AND PARALLEL WITH AN EXISTING GUY WIRE, A DISTANCE OF 82.74 FEET; THENCE RUN SOUTH 25 DEGREES 20 MINUTES 55 SECONDS EAST, A DISTANCE OF 5.00 FEET; THENCE RUN SOUTH 64 DEGREES 39 MINUTES 05 SECONDS WEST, 2.5 FEET SOUTHEASTERLY OF AND PARALLEL WITH AN EXISTING GUY WIRE, A DISTANCE OF 74.39 FEET TO A POINT 1 FOOT EAST OF AND PARALLEL WITH SAID CHAIN LINK FENCE; THENCE RUN SOUTH 00 DEGREES 56 MINUTES 58 SECONDS WEST, I FOOT EAST OF AND PARALLEL WITH SAID CHAIN LINK FENCE, A DISTANCE OF 26.74 FEET; THENCE RUN NORTH 89 DEGREES 12 MINUTES 30 SECONDS WEST, 1 FOOT SOUTH OF AND PARALLEL WITH SAID CHAIN LINK FENCE, A DISTANCE OF 25.33 FEET TO A POINT 2.5 FEET EASTERLY OF AN EXISTING GUY WIRE; THENCE RUN SOUTH 11 DEGREES 04 MINUTES 34 SECONDS WEST, 2.5 FEET EASTERLY OF AND -PARALLEL WITH AN EXISTING GUY WIRE, A DISTANCE OF 82.87 FEET; THENCE RUN NORTH 78 DEGREES 55 MINUTES 26 SECONDS WEST, A DISTANCE OF 5.00 FEET; THENCE RUN NORTH 11 DEGREES 04 MINUTES 34 SECONDS EAST, 2.5 FEET WESTERLY OF AND PARALLEL WITH AN EXISTING GUY WIRE, A DISTANCE OF 81.96 FEET TO A POINT 1 FOOT SOUTH OF SAID CHAIN LINK FENCE; THENCE RUN NORTH 89 DEGREES 12 MINUTES 30 SECONDS WEST, 1 FOOT SOUTH OF AND PARALLEL WITH SAID CHAIN LINK FENCE, A DISTANCE OF 1.99 FEET; THENCE RUN NORTH 00 DEGREES 22 MINUTES 23 SECONDS EAST, 1 FOOT WEST OF AND PARALLEL WITH SAID CHAIN LINK FENCE, A DISTANCE OF 18.82 FEET TO A POINT 2.5 FEET SOUTHWESTERLY OF AN EXISTING GUY WIRE; THENCE RUN NORTH 53 DEGREES 35 MINUTES 25 SECONDS WEST, 2.5 FEET SOUTHWESTERLY OF AND PARALLEL WITH AN EXISTING GUY WIRE, A DISTANCE OF 26.06 FEET TO A POINT ON THE EAST LINE OF THE AFORESAID INDIAN RIVER COUNTY EMERGENCY SERVICES DISTRICT PARCEL 'B'; THENCE CONTINUE NORTH 53 DEGREES 35 MINUTES 25 SECONDS WEST, A DISTANCE OF 37.26 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING." LESS AND EXCEPT THAT PORTION OF THE ABOVE AFORESAID DESCRIPTION OF THE "COUNTY DEED INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA", OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 3002, PAGE 187, OF WHICH HOUSES THE EXISTING ANTENNA AND ASSOCIATED EQUIPMENT WITHIN THE EXISTING FENCED AREA, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE POINT OF BEGINNING OF SAID "COUNTY DEED S:\P\18-2215 Datapath\Docs\Legal\DESCRIPTION OF GUY WIRE AND ANCHOR PARCELS.docx 134 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA" PARCEL, HAVING STATE PLANE COORDINATES OF N:1199899.18 E:849082.79(C) BASED ON NAD83/2007 FLORIDA EAST ZONE 901, RUN NORTH 53°35'25" WEST A DISTANCE OF 28.37 FEET; THENCE RUN NORTH 36°24'35" EAST A DISTANCE OF 5.00 FEET; THENCE RUN SOUTH 53035'25" EAST A DISTANCE OF 88.04 FEET TO A POINT 1 FOOT WEST OF AN EXISTING 8 FOOT HIGH CHAIN LINK FENCE AND POINT OF BEGINNING OF THE HEREIN LESS AND EXCEPT PARCEL; FROM SAID POINT OF BEGINNING HAVING STATE PLANE COORDINATES OF N:1199867.78 E:849133.78(C), BASED ON NAD83/2007, FLORIDA EAST ZONE 901, RUN NORTH 00°22'23" EAST, 1 FOOT WEST OF AND PARALLEL WITH SAID CHAIN LINK FENCE, A DISTANCE OF 1.55 FEET; THENCE RUN SOUTH 89031'58" EAST, 1 FOOT NORTH OF AND PARALLEL WITH SAID CHAIN LINK FENCE, A DISTANCE OF 32.66 FEET; THENCE RUN SOUTH 00°56'58" WEST, 1 FOOT EAST OF AND PARALLEL WITH SAID CHAIN LINK FENCE, A DISTANCE OF 26.74 FEET; THENCE RUN NORTH 89°12'30" WEST, 1 FOOT SOUTH OF AND PARALLEL WITH SAID CHAIN LINK FENCE, A DISTANCE OF 32.40 FEET; THENCE RUN NORTH 00022'23" EAST, 1 FOOT WEST OF AND PARALLEL WITH SAID CHAIN LINK FENCE, A DISTANCE OF 25.01 FEET TO THE POINT OF POINT OF BEGINNING. THE ABOVE DESCRIBED THREE STRIP PARCELS CONTAINING 1250.24 S.F. S:\P\18-221S Datapath\Docs\L.egal\DESCRIPTION OF GUY WIRE AND ANCHOR_PARCELS.docx 135 P : , f A j y p This document was prepared by: Indian River County Attorney's Office 1801 27th Street Vero Beach, FL 32960 (772) 226-1425 ACCESS AND PARKING/TURNAROUND EASEMENT THIS GRANT OF EASEMENT, made and executed this day of , 2018, by INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, having a mailing address of 1801 27th Street, Vero Beach, Florida, 32960, hereinafter called GRANTOR and DATAPATH TOWER, LLC, a Florida limited liability company, whose mailing address is 200 Central Avenue, St. Petersburg, Florida 33701, hereinafter called GRANTEE. WITNESSETH: That GRANTOR for and in consideration of the sum of TEN DOLLARS ($10.00) and other valuable consideration, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged by these presents does grant, bargain, sell, alien, remise, release, convey, and confirm unto the GRANTEE, a perpetual easement for ingress, egress and parking/turnaround over, across, and beneath the following described land, situate in Indian River County, Florida, with the maintenance responsibility being the responsibility of Grantee, to -wit: See Exhibit "A" attached hereto. And GRANTOR hereby covenants with said GRANTEE that the GRANTOR is lawfully seized of said servient land in fee simple, and that the GRANTOR has good right and lawful authority to convey the easement established hereby and will defend the same against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the GRANTOR has hereunto set its hand and seal the day and year first above written. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA BY: Peter D. O'Bryan, Chairman Date BCC Approved: Approved: By Jason E. Brown County Administrator Attest: Jeffrey R. Smith, Clerk of Court And Comptroller By: Deputy Clerk Approved as to form and legal sufficiency William K. DeBraal Deputy County Attorney 136 EM ww ¢zo � bwwawm W p x 2 U •`- Z W N K g ~O LL Z W e 0 r O Ow � aw C¢'���>>�U� 0 h NaU wo LLw_oaa E -O �z CU7� w0�� LL¢ PT 10, w 0 6 H wZ OLLz�f,��Nwd'LLidd-m zO-tn W OKat-V ao iy,7 V CJ Z Z W O U N W y Z O �N 2ZOJO 0�i��.ill� W W � W 0s d U�=p2Z u+5 WV LL Q¢� x 0 U � on '- 1-Z OaLL��uS�¢$ oo z W O j ' OZmSiyO ON Q a V oo v a 0 W w O N Z¢ <J wc�io=yrnzw<n�n¢.�� U�— p W p m to W� Z O S W Z O h W W �t�vo W i"..� ox, -gZ Z } Q }no ¢ l� } p Z LL¢ LLw�= W W p z O o SO r O~ o m O 0 z N Ow W F a¢ in- ORwo�w S �m LU v � z C W U w L�u � m V W m Z U W azz � y O U � WI O Qom''? O Z22N O O — O 2=CJO�wai o ZW w z a YZZ til � � o ? LL W U �U p Q ? d p- Ijll O in�t2s z tz0 � LL ujV W M T J r � � W m U U, S W N Q d O x W W LU � O C0 U z � 0 o Z U Q W Z O w z z O11 zo a 51 LU � � H � H -J �i cOi� p?a Q�'iaz ty3A� �60ZZ -e pHA r UN ((J =� Z?MG 6 \\wed �i UOm00�ndU0� �N�S� oao�n<1-o�t'z az��uNoi So�ow�'o o?�3 pU�o� L�7 ��SUN U m� F a ~ -2t � o � � > � o g o z � � � v v ? s yytrryy t •Zp � LLo a W � o = LLo C < Z U o N 0 0 6 a U OU— gaga 2 2 ''l'1am� 0Bso y0 •o Sn+zv J� nc Z Z Z W ZON O ZOwS�F-NS S Y Wxx pZ+ p W 2 p F.O Z¢ O O F .6 U U o ¢ E O O pK N pZ SN6 Z W NmW «O� m�jm fiO jU C- << 9 o 0 www g O W O Z O� N W N Z U~ O> Z Y N ti OU W Y O O W WON U O N ¢ N n N N W O J N O =SCJ O ¢¢ O 4 x Z O KO �w Q Q QNO�O Z Zd' 30Zp m� Ktn W Z� N EE N>- oFl uN255-5 C-; W W ZZ O U. 00 xW Nn ZO�'N NO SNN O w UO(m7 Z w y.0 O O U Z w z j F N w O W O Z a 0~ W LL Z 4 is W LL 2 zF�wiEwtFLL� cwQox o��� �g r d sr�xLLw�Y� �z>WOW`'Q =� m w O H W - N m O O? Z O d V O O O n w U K Z Z V rvp z W O lL 4z W Ok" wJ � w ad Ur-�Z �N�wn S O O K S F Z p Q O O m dn%t-O Z-yO19�2 N��z0oya } U)ow 2c Kponi-J ;- ki Z i O O 00oW r<� o U �� wa ow o ooa� zw�o �pz Qoad � E� > CO cxri. W= ro wz v ¢ ZO O 2 x OLL ¢ ¢ Q x N Z S n W O I F O¢ p u- K d - W m N O O O o D Z o"'z¢�-z aux-�wrE pCD �N _ F %7 F� W O C W Uyc.i2Ow� wU W YF -Z D LL O d' O uY Nk �cewa$rw�oznw �mn wn mow x m U z 4Q =LLZ ZO i OF �F-U Ow yOvyywZ H O� Z� m U Q N VJ Z 3 a w-� W W CSO �U �tn� ZZ W 0 O LL W O O U z2 g o Q N C w Z w W m d W N O W Y O a W aW `5 oz= uw.� �i oz -•N ZuN� ¢� r-��ow[r� OF- O Nvi rx-Z oxw N - Z UZ Z O C N r a o x ¢ d o v w¢ w y = 2 N y� 9'dN aw N¢ oo�oFQ N�mwn wwo¢"%cmi wzo U {U 4 J K LL ZO ¢¢ �O w w Z fn Z O Z Z N U C O x K 0 0 n. OO¢ w = S � W �� Z- Wm W Fwx- ZO m W�Om� xxu.oQ� W O �nU `� W ZG Fx-� h W N N w 'O W LL> Z� W 1-a-'. d O W yip ai wd, 4 i=-n�.w LL=1 u¢l u� vi 7d cwi�RS zo� �ti c9i owo�+� _M ^C> V Z Wg LJ U Q U � m W Min = o M W j ysado°a W LU 00 Cr Z W S-2FOM �♦�awUco VOfn W W �¢ U Q U � Z C"5 w = O CO Com? »L— =---'-_--- ------ •pper� g zt- � LU i2 WW w0 Z OO �w \� O8- h NG( LLLU m. o WZM�lif N 4 M 3 3 HR 00 H U S 0 o�p Fz w x b' az O N c��N �o ���OU �y� U oao Win' qam wN QUGH 0 LLI cr C5 ru it: EECl U 4 .Z9 -OZ L 3 „00,00-00 5 \ o ZL 3 ,.00,00.00 N Vf w f7i Nom+ --------- - ---- asa �5N �LL� 69ZZ `Jd '908 n C -r i (0) ,00'08b (0),6Z'b/_t 7vc.Z0.0 N --- I / Al z��� 1yi N m �coi io. C5w CL: U d O�W^ 1 U �¢ m 0n z ics n � N W ery m WW W U O W � Z QJ 3 Z m rj a U y o � o WU O � O x O N K v O Z OO Ll F - W N pNN U OLa p Q K Q w W U V O M LU !A UUZZmW 5 W Yim Z O F Q JJ Z < O U Z D U cn �- Q L7 Q _Z � d > U OK¢Z O S O m U a W ZSOZs o- z m CU Z �- 2FUC =a W W W \emry .9W hN 1- o W o a vin o 4302 x x W W W2O� O m Wa00a00 :3 sF Lu ¢ Y Y w 3 Co In W M 000 N (SISVB ONI8V38) (0,9/'Or/3 „b L,SO.00 N ®®® Z This document was prepared by: Indian River County Attorney's Office 1801 27th Street Vero Beach, FL 32960 (772) 226-1425 UTILITY EASEMENT THIS GRANT OF EASEMENT, made and executed this day of , 2018, by INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, having a mailing address of 1801 27th Street, Vero Beach, Florida 32960, hereinafter called GRANTOR and DATAPATH TOWER, LLC, a Florida limited liability company, whose mailing address is 200 Central Avenue, St. Petersburg, Florida 33701, hereinafter called GRANTEE. WITNESSETH: That GRANTOR for and in consideration of the sum of TEN DOLLARS ($10.00) and other valuable consideration, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged by these presents does grant, bargain, sell, alien, remise, release, convey, and confirm unto the GRANTEE, a perpetual easement for utilities over, across, above and beneath the following described land, situate in Indian River County, Florida, to -wit: See Exhibit "A" attached hereto. And GRANTOR hereby covenants with said GRANTEE that the GRANTOR is lawfully seized of said servient land in fee simple, and that the GRANTOR has good right and lawful authority to convey the easement established hereby and will defend the same against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the GRANTOR has hereunto set its hand and seal the day and year first above written. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Attest: Jeffrey R. Smith, Clerk of Court INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA And Comptroller BY: Peter D. O'Bryan, Chairman Date BCC Approved: Approved: By Jason E. Brown County Administrator Bv: Deputy Clerk Approved as to form and legal sufficiency William K. DeBraal Deputy County Attorney 140 LL, uj rr� LLI am E;.u°g2 •i F oo�roi�tonz .Cnz o N e g 2r!12,91§19!Wji oin �� � �_ 6 o e rwno wLL�zg zv o S fw,i gQd E8m `2 _pW V�-- gUJ m UNooz poi oLL oyN fW zomN �oWJ8o-cw�¢iF BSSw�Wo�o .�Z+ �g$'a2s B O m uV�j�LOLL�Li. - tj noZ ¢ W o 6a�; W ZL i 7 a lag k U ti U Qo—=o Nu43 zwou5� p"r�i,� a � y A� 3� ' i W U => �U Fo o wnH FLL� ¢ r� $ 75t JU �S $� 3HE Q ai ¢ 1—ONZW o f o Jom $ $oma z a ga.n N ss Fa R dg ¢Z¢ W �0 �LL>� �$ E do -$8 o`od. o4'SrQQzz 8W§ oz awt"�oo 8t3P O g w �a g 1ae'yw�gfiL" zo �aomo,zZ Wo_ z �� 34 -or, A m> Fgmwcwi� mo wy c z3s 'dF$'d�"��o�dg��8 O z D.m O (Y7 N�_11 W 6Q {yy � F rJ¢ N K U¢ 6a nl iil q o Uy B K�y� � o? �iiZ a J C%1 zz ��zi=w c�H a to rn 8" o,.3w ¢o J� zoLLo�LLw>�� c �Z z s g� aytiE�te�aQ, &F o uF zoo Fm F "nza��i m O� Fj W�z wQ�o ac�z= wa �€ �is �5��3 � �€� _� o ov O ULLJY a w LLO wZo pLLLLyZ j w w w O �3 3o Gio P-� gzirc� �� 5 - tyS.zL�j�ocwiW=w� uN5 t5 Z oLL�'1 �a.y3g OU Z> w Y+ t 9w¢ NQ I H H -Hg sj `5 ����c�' �` 99 z �� wZi�tn=ow v� w zi will oLLoox z: LL O wrLi w ��zog�o� o o ! y �3 so>;hnc�oom w w,o; o ME QE ZE C, [C� Z WJ }I rn O � n M Ab U O C M ¢ O w r J \ ~ (Q O ¢ Ow M LU m N 2 w� iMH Z (V Y'J �U• tit F8-�twiFO¢ffi¢�Z O�rJ6 w �o W U zF� 1° g EAR w w$eowwco?oz o<t� f � K �lw��� � o UJO x y c c� c, m CO � mor v < x ma a s ¢ Z� inS"o5"' o ¢ �" O O < w - yye3zzoU �aQ-o-LL m Uz ¢ W S J- �" 25 Qi a. o <w N 0 o w z z a G 3> a mcsr ri a W W¢ en co C� m o: LU 0 O w S � F a o p U U S } � O Z � O z � > O o O G1 U Z Wco ~O o W Z z CO z p C6 x LU CDa U U) co W S S 2 F- r r - ry --------------- 6SZZ od '909 •8,2J'O L z _ (a) ,00-091 _ „9„ ( .00'094 (0),6Z'DG n� rn p) in U J CJ 6 z w= = O N U O � C O O O c�o m O om _ U >N C zG 2 Q fC fl O b CJ7 Zo d. 6 � D b ry --------------- 6SZZ od '909 •8,2J'O L z _ (a) ,00-091 _ „9„ ( .00'094 (0),6Z'DG w W � v gx �n o � vwiM N a o 'a" LIM irz, H �o rom � eF N 1 M „6£,ZO.00 N (SISVB ONI?JV39) (O,SL'O£L 3 „b L, 90,00 N z tz CN wO z U) Chi in U J CJ 6 W W Y U W ' C O O O c�o m O om _ U >N C zG 2 Q fC fl O N Zo d. 6 � D z o � o � x W O � � 3 O a w W � v gx �n o � vwiM N a o 'a" LIM irz, H �o rom � eF N 1 M „6£,ZO.00 N (SISVB ONI?JV39) (O,SL'O£L 3 „b L, 90,00 N z tz CN wO z U) Chi INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA MEMORANDUM TO: Jason E. Brown; County Administrator THROUGH: Stan Boling, AICP; Community Development Director FROM: John W. McCoy, AICP; Chief, Current Development DATE: June 4, 2018 SUBJECT: Request by David J. Haeseler, Eve D. Haeseler, Nancy Ellen Casey, Trustee, Florida Academy of Impairment Ratings, Inc., and Kashi Church Foundation, Inc. for the Abandonment of Two Twenty Foot Wide Roadway Easements Over Lots 1, 2, 3, and 4, POD G Village of Kashi PD [ROW -18-02-02 / 2008110007-80637] It is requested that the data herein presented be given formal consideration by the Board of County Commissioners at its regular meeting of June 19, 2018. DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS: The firm of McKinnon & Hamilton, PLLC as agent representing Mr. and Mrs. Haeseler is requesting abandonment of a 40' wide roadway easement on behalf of the owners of lots 1 — 4 of Village of Kashi POD G. The roadway easements were established by deed in the early 1930's to provide access from Roseland Road to parcels that did not front Roseland Road at that time. The roadway easements are depicted on the plat of the Village of Kashi, Phase IA and run across lots 1- 4 of POD G (see attachment #2). The applicants are seeking abandonment of the portion that runs through lots 1-4 of POD G. The lot owners requesting abandonment of the roadway easement want to "clear title" and are requesting the County abandon any rights the public might have to easements. While the roadway easements were created by deed in the 1930s, the easements were not improved for access. The language in the deed did reserve a 40' wide strip for a public and private roadway. Although the County's interest in the roadway easements is not clear, the applicant seeks to ensure that any possible interest of the public or county is abandoned in order to "clear title". The County has approved similar request in the past for historic and unclear dedications. The applicant is now requesting that the county abandon any interest the public may have in the subject right-of-way. ANALYSIS: While the Kashi subdivision plat of 2008 did not create the roadway easements, the easements are illustrated on the plat for informational purposes. As illustrated on the plat, a roadway easement runs across several lots and easements created by the Village of Kashi PD plat. During review of the requested abandonment, County staff and several utility providers gave approvals with the condition that the abandonment be done in a manner that does not affect the underlying plat, and if abandoned, the underlying property will revert to the purpose intended on the plat of the Village of 143 C:\Users\legistar\AppData\Local\Temp\BCL Technologies\easyPDF 8\@BCL@8435C6DE\@BCL@8435C6DE.docx Kashi PD. To that end, the abandonment resolution specifically states that the area subject to the roadway easement will revert to the use and ownership as shown and dedicated on the Village of Kashi Phase IA plat. Per guidelines established by the Board of County Commissioners, the petition was reviewed by all County division and utility providers having jurisdiction or potential interests within the right-of- way. All reviewing agencies and departments have recommended approval of the abandonment with the condition that the underlying Village of Kashi Phase IA plat is not affected. These rights- of-way are not part of the roadway system as noted on the County Thoroughfare Plan, and are not needed for the thoroughfare system. Furthermore, the abandonment would not affect the right of convenient access, since the plat of Village of Kashi PD Phase IA makes provisions for access for the property between Roseland Road and the St. Sebastian River via private subdivision streets. The County Attorney's Office has reviewed and approved the attached abandonment resolution for legal form and sufficiency. RECOMMENDATION: Based on the analysis, staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners abandon its rights as described in the attached resolution and authorize the chairman to execute the attached abandonment resolution. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Application with Cover Letter 2. Location Map 3. Page 3 & 6 of the Village of Kashi Phase IA Plat 4. Abandonment Resolution 144 C:\Users\legistar\AppData\Local\Temp\BCL Technologies\easyPDF 8\@BCL@8435C6DE\@BCL@8435C6DE.docx 2 Charles W. McKinnon Lisa R. -Hamilton "AA W),NDDIE LIV +RY MCKINNON & HAMILTON, PLLC ATTORNEYS AND COUNSLWRS AT LAW The Atrium Building 3055 Cardinal Dr., Suite 302 Zero Beach, Florida 32983 November 9, 2017 John McCoy, Chief of Community Development Indian River County 1801 27h Street Vero Beach, Florida 32960 Re: Petition 1'clbTttoacl �"si�stnc3ostetat Dear Mr. McCoy: Telephone • 772-231-3770 Facsimile 772-231-8774 Cur fum represents Mr. and Mrs. David J. Haeseler. I have discussed with Bill DeBraal, Esq. our client's hope to have a never used; public roadway abandoned. Mr. DeBraal provided to me the required application and asked that I forward it to you once it was completed. I have enclosed herein our client's signed Petition for Abandonment of Publicly Dedicated Rights -of - Way, Street or Ailey for the Board of County Commissioner's consideration, along with our client's check in the amount of $700.00 for the application fee. If you have any questions on this matter, please feel free to cal l Chuck McKinnon or me. Sincerely yours, Lisa R Hamilton Enclosures cc: Mr. and Mrs. David J. Haeseler 24181-001 145 1 ATYACME l 1 PETITIONFOR ABANDONMENT OF PUBLICLIZ DEDICATED RIGHTS-OF-WAY, STREET OR ALLEY T -:J David 1. Haeseler, Eve D. Haeseler, Nancy Ellen Casey, Trustee, Florida Academy of impaftmelickao"S's Inc. and Kashi Church Foundation, Inc., hereby petitions Indian River County to abandon the twenty (20) foot private and public roadway easements over Lots 1, 2, 3 and 4, Pod G, Village of Kashi, P.D., Phase 1A, according to the Plat thereof, recorded in Plat Book 23, Page 100; referred to in Plat Book 24 at Page 38 and Plat Book 40 at Page 422 of the Public Records of Indian Rjvcr County, Florida. Th- reason for this request is (should include intended use of property): For residential purposcs. Applicant's Name: David J. Haesple and Eve D. Haeseler Address: 11254 Ganesh Wgy, Sebastian. Florida 32958 Telephone: C772.) 589-1546 Email: da,,idhw6e1cr0Le_1lsnu(h.net Signature -Applicant's Name: Nancy Ellen Casey, Trustee Address: 11244 Ganesh Way, #9, Sebastian, Florida 32958 Date: -.4r" U� � 017 Telephone: Telephone: (575) 770-0568 Email: rumi3JJ5ra)msnxo Signature-lgaoi_-7/an Cc�ta__c --I'—AIJ Date: ID /5-1 2017 Applicant's Name; Florida Academy of Impainnent Ratings, inc. Address: 11264 Ganesh Way, Sebastian, Flo dda 32958 Telephone: 352 5 - 34 E il: ore gojnj)kdhjun X's,ignature Date' 11(9-- 7 - Applicant's Name- Kashi Church Foundation; Inc. Address: 11155 Roseland Road, jj(jx 910 Sebastian Florida 32958 Telephone: (772) 599-1403 Email: d - gdWhi,ork Signature--jU Date: �4 '2017 146.1 List of property owners abutting the portion of the road requester= to be vacated: William S. Blakeslee, 111., 11105 Roseland Road, Box #9, Sebastian, Florida 32958 Telephone: 772473-4079 Email: va a belIsouth net William D. McKee and Teresa Sliger Lamb, I 1358 Kashi Court, Sebastian, Florida 32958 Telephone: 865-755-0778 Email: migpuntn(J)hotmaiLcam Michal Ashton and Pamela E. Wright, 11375 Kashi Court, Sebastian, Florida 32958 Telephone: 404-308-8392 Email: masodashi L08gM9l.com Martha F. Schiff, 11355 Kashi Court, Sebastian, Florida 32958 TAlephotte: 772-217-1376 Email: m8chifF717,a.b llanuSh.net Durga Das Butner and Saraswati Kaur Rose, 11105 Roseland Road, Unit 3, Sebastian, FL 32958 Telephone: 772-4734123 Email: dursadasnkashi.ora Barry Mitchell, 11344 Ganesh Way, Sebastian, Florida 32958 Telephone: 772473-8168 Entail: babara-m—a- kashi,org Bhagavati Das Kali Bausman & Jennifer Hausman, 11155 Roseland Rd, Unit 12, Sebastian, FL 32958 Telephone: 772-913-5144 Email: bhagava4da$.1008(@vahoo.com Edna B. Perkins and Kali Mirashyam Blakeslee, 11381 Ganesh Way, Sebastian, Florida 32958 Telephone: 772-532-2085 Email: matagiflNrkinsLaj&mail.com Maria Stillo Soranno, 11361 Ganesh Way, Sebastian, Florida 32958 Telephone: 772-538-3328 Email:.bagala(e?bellsouth.net Joyce B. Wasserman nka Ganga Mayee J. Wasserman, 11085 Mulberry Street, Sebastian, Florida 32958 Telephone: 772-713-6222 Email: ganganayee108 a�yahoo.com John G. Evans, 1.1155 Roseland Road, Box 1, Sebastian, Florida 32958 Telephone: 772-589-1522 Email:.detawl@bcllgguth.net Chase A. Rogers, 11249 Ganesh'Vay,-Sebastian, -Florida 32958 Telephone: Email: chasingway_Dt jai mail.com Dhumavati Nage Jaya flea Lucy V. Horse & Satimayee Jaya, 11239 Ganesh Way, Sebastian, FL 32958 Telephone: 772-532-5327 E-mail: dhumavati(a,kashi.org 147 ATTACHMENT, 00 •U P'� a NoK�� W 5 R� ���$• a. .�+• aid A xx�� e J " z o naFg<A' 11Jw�mq 3217C "� �w" Za o ata lliL •�z�."'. �e `@ 3 � tl x..11. �.-5 MGM gis If Lin -t atz 6L Gn ICY` i"� m° 1 ll'1y�V �!eb 9 OH4�mpb�y& ►JIQl9dl v 1lpltvdp7� yW 5 , tOLVAgpiC70DMYi" T - \ .R. 1JlYl� MZIS.yrWLL wo 89 ` an i;��� j.pi e 8 e C eF� �':CS �yw� 4 �4<gydyy bayyry�n, ~�l`i v v 0 d Jam~ 4g�g aga9 wo _ «6 Rini " N n Y � 7U��a i Iy F t�2y4t„�Y 11 Q(1 . a g �4pW �AC _y ErA S �. bw s �_ N.• g>= e- i �e IN jrcj Ilit O an i;��� j.pi e 8 e C eF� �':CS �yw� 4 �4<gydyy bayyry�n, ~�l`i v v 0 d 4g�g g ,aes CM: Y � 7U��a i Iy F t�2y4t„�Y 1 `pew 4 , COs O�I���� � �!<b�A Q(1 . a g �4pW �AC Sit i1 diR Y roan>a W, �r�4ii }..�asaaaaassaaassa�>sssasss�:„: � c's^�:; a„ r. «rvaii=_« Paa=«ii%w9wwMzw%�nOsP:ns-�Xa°a%n� wWLL o ' o J 2� � fr!'!!wfrwww amf..fiiwW.frrr riimrrmww.w�rr aax,S-na588$_=” ;;a -.s gas ` s �sgs�sa 's««««:.e w �:a��aaaaa:eeaan,�:: c n r CE�h a��,R�ffinaaAe^e:nh:nwaaa_^_��§e8.8:$ O 2 i o LUu.}�u0 yQ »...zzs..zs:zzz«z.ssm.szrrz }....: m W R yo am.::z:s,::R:,xaan�sRsoaasaaaas�����e��r�t: �"J Li! A ffi JJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJ✓JJJJJJ✓JJJJJ a 0v o xry a�2:e%�ao�--. o_ a a a o-^.....aaaa�------^a^as„99u^zzm o � s ` `....rifmmruwwmrw..�.WWW Q w i $o '.� \ i Q......E..........1-?^^ISSRe�81C=eC�3::R.Ron F^ °f $baa \ � �oY^ffi 'BS.RBBB'"='a�RR»aaaaR:Ra2S88=��: fig .> o f c:' •h4 b s a' �$k$::a�aaooq � s!t n-' RIS ! ....« .. s ......xszzz... ..•«...,..z •L".'��•�....ea---- ---- R:.«««.^.RAAR$A^..^.X.^. R.^..... $ ` Y`4�• g_ �S>.�1 j \ JJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJ JJJJJ — p��e �■ • goy• � ;s3a � \ �.\\ � 4 �� �� Oil 104 I Its z Y \Zak S•.lrv� FW �° ry w F \ �A� x�y�. / sus Ia 0 ii yO�.0 NW W 4E+ •xm Nel Q -Ile 5• Z� �. Z,. i y ,yob +rte. g 5� \\ In JnF� iiiir ruulr}R::► f J •. � /. ` n J6 ' .LJd. m�6 Z6.Wi� IW,T z. OH nR.�n• t=.. v. J43 -ca 93R�� RBSR.a«d < ° TLAIND o<< a9d'8na8oc^o`R:4o ice' -n �. EA s VEifi VATIVN 4� sonar nZeRER: '\t�2LL<•W C � _� LLLL H •' a z�o��? .+ g�jdl-- !'g �vj`/' d SSSSS888885%%888 m �6 4_4 ry6_ 'aM1r!-. A.RB:.^. ,,/ 4�cRi `n \ $�lil c� o lil - motiL of M� 8<�x �� tViUVVUYVUUYYVVY VY � j �R< � �• \ \ � ` �' \\it J m cY �',}���°' •17�ti mk~ � �._.A.X[-8vo^o:,.•.,.o.^.=:B:�S�io-wXS.«..n3R8n8�'Se%'.{RB`Cfa P.l e � i w • e::iv.'�R.o o.i .ew. n.:.i o.: o e.: Q in q-..- • j q`• umi Y�lritf.NYi►)�iiii icor MiiW WmYhlm mAif ii iii iY.ii / 6 S Ile$~x �g� s � � e QB�«.��«SCOoE7(`..SSS000eoS.S.«l_.•.Ebne,.'+”-'�aSffi:.,o,o«��=�a�'..R.�\ / � .- ��J�. zam Ffi $$.«.!i"S$.".»•-.43FF_E3"?.m.::P.:o- :<Xs8o:' o-ffioo83« o'� o� � $ a g }zzxzs........zs. i.xs:.:zsaaa:c:«».az.»...;... In \.-z.m.@iW_ g5 rY 2 s:— es # m `$� �.4 ��� oaaesa4ggSo^ia^ov6S88osaasssaa`=="_._._a���=:_RA _m-b.� i«eYIL� C O 4lil\i�<�i� JJ JJJJJ JJ✓JJJJJ JJJJJJJJJJ JJ JJ:IJJJJJ JJ JJJJJJ✓ \ Gady��• CFJ RESOLUTION 2018- A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, PROVIDING FOR THE CLOSING, ABANDONMENT, VACATION AND DISCONTINUANCE OF A 40' ROADWAY EASEMENT LYING 20 FEET ON EITHER SIDE OF THE COMMON LINE BETWEEN LOTS 57 AND 78 AND THE COMMON LINE BETWEEN LOTS 56 AND 79, SECTION 28, FLEMING GRANT ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF, RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 1, PAGE 175, PUBLIC RECORDS OF BREVARD (NOW INDIAN RIVER) COUNTY FLORIDA, LYING WITHIN LOTS 1 THROUGH 4, POD "G", VILLAGE OF KASHI, PD, PHASE IA ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 23, PAGES 100 THROUGH 106, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, AS DESCRIBED HEREIN; SAID ABANDONMENT SUBJECT TO RETAINING A DRAINAGE EASEMENT. WHEREAS, on November 15, 2017, Indian River County received a duly executed and documented petition from David J. Haeseler, Eve D. Haeseler, Nancy Ellen Casey, Trustee, Florida Academy of Impairment Ratings, Inc., and Kashi Church Foundation, Inc. requesting that the County close, vacate, abandon, discontinue, renounce, and disclaim any right, title, and interest of the County and the public in and to all that portion of the 40 foot easement lying 20 feet on either side of the common line between lots 57 and 78 and the common line between lots 56 and 79, section 28, Fleming Grant according to the plat thereof, recorded in plat book 1, page 175, public records of Brevard (now Indian River) county Florida, lying within lots 1 through 4, POD "G", Village of Kashi, PD, Phase I according to the plat thereof, as recorded in plat book 23, pages 100 through 106, of the public records of Indian River county, Florida; and WHEREAS, in accordance with Florida Statutes 336.10, notice of a public hearing to consider said petition was duly published; and WHEREAS, after consideration of the petition, supporting documents, staff investigation and report, and testimony of all those interested and present, the Board finds that the subject right- of-way ight- ofway is not a state or federal highway, not located within any municipality, not necessary for continuity of the County's street and thoroughfare network, and does not provide exclusive access to any private property; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA that: 1. All right, title and interest of the County and the public in and to that certain right-of-way segment more particularly described as follows: ALL THAT PORTION OF THE 40 FOOT EASEMENT LYING 20 FEET ON EITHER SIDE OF THE COMMON LINE BETWEEN LOTS 57 AND 78 AND THE COMMON LINE BETWEEN LOTS 56 AND 79, SECTION 28, FLEMING GRANT ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF, RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 1, PAGE 175, PUBLIC RECORDS OF BREVARD (NOW INDIAN RIVER) COUNTY FLORIDA, LYING WITHIN LOTS 1 THROUGH 4, POD "G", VILLAGE OF 151 1 ATTPCHMENT 4 RESOLUTION 201.8- KASHI, P.D., PHASE 1A ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 23, PAGES 100 THROUGH 106, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA. Lying and being in Indian River County, Florida, is hereby forever closed, abandoned, renounced, disclaimed, and vacated (see Exhibit A attached) 2. The closing, vacation, and abandonment of these portions of public right-of-way is in the best interests of the public. 3. Notice of the adoption of this resolution shall be forthwith published once within thirty (30) days from the date of adoption hereof. 4. The Clerk is hereby directed to record this resolution together ,.vith the proofs of publication required by Florida Statutes 336.10 in the Official Record Books of Indian River County without undue delay. 5. The roadway easement shall revert to purpose as shown and dedicated on the Village of Kashi, PD Phase IA, and ownership revert to underlying owner as shown on the Village of Kashi PD Phase IA. According to the plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 23, Pages 100 through 106 of the Public Records of Indian River County, Florida. The foregoing resolution was offered by Commissioner adoption. The motion was seconded by Commissioner to a vote, the vote was as follows: Chairman Peter D. O'Bryan Vice Chairman Bob Solari Commissioner Susan Adams Commissioner Joseph E. Flescher Commissioner Tim Zorc _ who moved its and upon being put The Chairman thereupon declared the resolution duly passed and adopted this day of .2018. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA BY: Peter D. O'Bryan, Chairman 1522 TATACnERT RESOLUTION 2018 - ATTEST: Jeffrey R. Smith, Cleric of Court and Comptroller BY: Deputy Clerk I HEREBY CERTIFY that on this day, before me, and officer duly- authorized in this State and County to take acknowledgments, personally appeared and as Chairman of the Board of County Commissioners and Deputy Clerk, respectively, to me known to be the persons described in and who executed the foregoing instrument and they acknowledged before me that they executed the same. WITNESS my hand and official seal in the County and State last aforesaid this day of .2018. Notary Public APPROVED AS TO LEGAL SUFFICIENCY Dylan Reingold, County Attorney APPROVED AS TO PLANNING MATTERS Stan Boling, AICP, Director Community Development Department 113 DESCRIPTION EXHIBIT A ALL THAT PORTION OF THE 40 FOOT EASEMENT LYING 20 FEET ON EITHER SIDE OF THE COMMON LINE BETWEEN LOTS 57 AND 78 AND THE COMMON LINE BETWEEN LOTS 56 AND 79, SECTION 28. FLEMING GRANT ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF. RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK I. PAGE 175. PUBLIC RECORDS OF BREVARD (NOW INDIAN RIVER) COUNTY FLORIDA. LYING WITHIN LOTS I THROUGH 4. POD "G'. VILLAGE OF KASHI. P.D.. PHASE IA ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF. AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 23. PAGES 100 THROUGH 106. OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY. FLORIDA. cel LOT 1 f/ 20' EASEMENT PER LOTf� DB 24 , PAGE 38 0 Dnn 'lull rl rA T A I // / D SURVEYOR'S I. ALL DIMENSIONS SHOWN HEREON ARE IN FEET AND DECIMAL PARTS THEREOF. EASEMEtvT. ER VAoN 2 -DATE OF SKETCH: JANUARY 25. 2018 DB - DEED BOOK D&UE - DRAINAGE & UTILITY.EASEMENT R/W - RIGHT OF WAY THIS SKETCH OF DESCRIPTION IS NOT VALID WITHOUT THE SIGNATURE' AND ORIGINAL RAISED SEAL OF THE FLORIDA LICENSED SURVEYOR & MAPPER NAMED BELOW. -SURVEYOR AND MAPPER IN RESPONSIBLE CHARGE DAV I D. M. JONES _ _ELORjD1�._ I CENSE NUMBER LS 3909 AN SKETCH OF DESCRIPTION NOT A FIELD BOUNDARY SURVEY DAVID M. JONES 14PROFESSIONAL SURVEYOR d MAPPER (772)567-9875. 2266 COR4AVENUE (772)567-0172 FAX VERO BEACH. FL 32960 June 19, 2018 Kashi Roadway Easement Abandonment Board of County Commissioners June 19, 2018 Location Map f 3 I x j �-. '� .. t � } � � r,.6Yii"rai""' } � •�\ / - •H t � i � i F y \ � u( 1 J [jam Seg eat \i1 1 z i 10.A..1 1 June 19, 2018 Location Map & Aerial Easement Subject Segment Sketch & Legal Description DE9d �i7I0.Y _ E%MBRA DAV10 M. 10NE5 ., mu[ rMiRNr;E1r7 E ry < LDT 1 i / r1tO' LOT �' vER oe x•. RRUE a 'ISE a } POD if FI_F .1 , � �+`�. . Lo' 1L-Ltr3 r � y j oT i i .%`_.�JoracRrnm r j L07 2 POO 'G- (. 1E111d711'%C , (J // Pr TLANO CONS ASE/!ENT _, IfON i OS •O'a M If 2R •s t� \LLL au+rrroR R>rfn: LOT ?9 � -DECD cDOR 4r 'Dlufu9r D':S Y RR!: DdUi - pn. ♦♦ Yril�r, Rafuffrr Rr(Y� CT •sY IsRr ic, — DECIu.r 6 rMREDr. �AI�, r' _ D.:r Do a•rnr: aeK.,a+r 15. r>m SKETCH OF _ [arms ar uua:niDv rc mr vniD r�r.:u: DESCRIPTION [Lq!iDR [rrr»sn L'a DAV10 M. 10NE5 ., mu[ rMiRNr;E1r7 E Analysis ➢ Roadway Easement Established in 1930s ➢ Conflicts with Plat and Improvements ➢ Abandon to clear title ➢ No Physical change ➢ No need to retain any easements ➢ Underlying Plat will control Staff Recommendation ➢ That the Board of County Commissioners abandon its rights as described in the attached resolution and authorize the chairman to execute the attached abandonment resolution. 5 6 June 19, 2018 3 June 19, 2018 _ Detail Plat Excerpt fK SR' Yky I M a M MCSppNf R}'.M6'A PAYH N S.' 14 4A - t; Af f 4 (a LFtf L W'4 fYs':iawt stA' Dt +v Aar �a W01 R I .n• �s� DarrA i, sti+sa. f t:c - a� HER aw A If: "1 � ° ifo v r iso! - .c sc oA ,. « , Asz a- r'�F �&A krlM alae. A.dL' MIA a iuAAi-aMftt+¢'ia'i��IItwrxaw� s ! _ sv�vst 3- _ g \ �••'"'��'`�p��Tr -Araa rAfA z�ue>�fa 4 ie' iitik RA�,� T�C�d x i Jss V�nsaII.tA�GI�YR +AsrAFtr 10.A.A. 4 Deed of Road Easement Overall Plat N June 19, 2018 �.5j - 5 A PLAT Of VILLAGE 05 KASHI. P.D,, PHASE IA N June 19, 2018 �.5j - 5 STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF INDIAN RIVER Before the undersigned authority personally appeared, Natalie Zollar, who on oath says that she is Classified Inside Sales Manager of the Indian River Press Journal, a daily newspaper published at Vero Beach in Indian River County, Florida: that the attached copy of advertisement was published In the Indian River Press Journal in the following issues below. Affiant further says that the said Indian River Press Journal Is a newspaper published in Vero Beach in said Indian River County, Florida, and that said newspaper has heretofore been continuously published in said Indian River County, Florida; daily and distributed In Indian River County, Florida, for a period of one year next preceding the first publication of the attached copy of advertisement; and affiant further says that she has neither paid or promised any person, firm or corporation any discount, rebate, commission or refund for the purpose of securing this advertisement for publication in the said newspaper. The Indian River Press Journal has been entered as Periodical Matter at the Post Offices in Vero Beach, Indian River County, Florida and has been for a period of one year next preceding the first publication of the attached copy of advertisement. Customer Ad Number Co line PO8 463755 - INDIAN RIVER COUNTY PLANNING/CDD - 2020045 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Notice of a - Pub Dates June 3, 2018 Sworn to and subscribed before me this day of, June 04, 2018, by ,t!� who is Natalie Z.11 -- (X) personally known to me or - - - - ( ) who has produced - as identification. Karol Kangas Notary Public KAROLEKANGAS .. 0t NoIMP.1:lk-StateofFI.M. Commission # GG IMI t0,t € _ _ _ MyComm ExplreSJu129,2021 nanOedlMaghNelbiWNotmyAnn 1 CA —W 2F 1 SUNDAY, JUNE 3, 2018 1 TREASURE COAST NEWSPAPERS To uT bac Notices CHEST B8Y NOOKER Brand Y ®. w cund, brownish look. - Anyone who y withtc MuStsee1S650(T72)342-3341 appeal nnY ded,on, whid gtiCe yy e made at this meeting DINING ROOM SEF - Dark W1 d.....eaf table, dY willneed to ensure thalaver NOTICE OF ELECTION baUm record of the proceed Ch/matehirg but. FeL china wbirret. fx d. Ings h made whkh Indudes The Town of SewaiFs Point lh¢ testimotry ad evi0eazr f1500 be (772)778-3850 Ivni haw two (2) Commis I upon which tbe appeal will N evrelry: Costume�ne is digiblc tar demon In b'sed 20IB.If mo re than Rw(5)wn- INDIAN RIVER COUNTY dldates Qualify tar tthhe two LLWIY6BUYING-OOSTUME] BOARD Of COUNTY (J) open To Commission COMMISSIONERS MLVER a FINE, LL therepen be a primary election. The rimery election BYa-Peter D O'Bryan, Call (772)529-1561 shall be held on August 28 Chairman hlic Notices eques[for8ids ues[for Bids V posed to bm.e raised t tne me¢IfHoswwr, thyse 'Trymust accompany each furnished and all work per• nt a Bid, end must be in tM /arm farmed shall be in strict accor- f AIA Document Alto Bld dance 11 Me plans, sped- gr n requezty}a public meetl Therefor¢, written ^B tiom, and contract doc- a^^d r'%, ted bbyv _t,._ the 8ldder WW :_.Is thereto. comments sbeed be submit- arld aaualif"ed oertalning urety, ar a certifietl check Coo es of tltk dowments arc towithin to daysof pull"- Uon of Nis rgUce, even if a or a bier's check, drawn ilable at: -demand- yank star.com publk meeting Is requested, q anauthorized to do or WW tacti' the business In the state of flori- PurWslrg DMiton at (»U If a puhlk rtseeU is Sehed- ^9 da. Bid security-lbeinibe 226.3416 or purchasing lrc- sum of not less than Five Per- Sov<om. All atber cemmuM- uld, the public wmmen, umcet11t1trhhqe cent (5%) f the total amount Clore _me Ing this bid f the hid de payable b sha0 he directed to IRC Pur. 9M. the public U Is hire Imnan Rlwr County board M besing DMsion al purchas- Irlg®Ircgw.wm a Publk meenn g t oral ar Wry person may It.. eountY tommissloners tri the eyegt the CmrnA thawarded 2018 pen n statements end data tDihe Bdder, 0idder willener All bldders zhalf submit one FINE JEWELRY WANTED: _ Pob:lupe 3.2018 al Us6 mcetinp on the De Dart In a Contrad VAN the County (ol) original and orre (1) copy Courteous Palm Bendrer The ofRdal wndixte qualif - TCN 2027670 Yz proposed ncNan. As and fumish Ne regtared 100% f the Bid Proposal forms buys deliggrr��ee tlpue, i Dad y a rezdt of slgnKwnt public Public Construction Bond p. -t ded within the spedfi- and modem. Fa111561401-ot22 Ing 'I f018 Nrro�uggh STATE Oi RORIOA me t. the Department's VANIn the timeframe set by tions. Poease _to that the n, F day June T1, 10 18. DEPARTMENT OF RrW aztkn may be different the County. It Bidder lolls to Olcstlonnalre must be filled Persons desirin to Qualls ENWRONMENTAI from the opsitloi taken by It be so. Ne Bid Seadty shag cat mmpletety Indudimml1 the ed Equip$SupplieS , y PROTECTION Intbe dro [permit. beretalrrcd by the County as FinancialstatamanLBIDSFCU- didate for sucyh elec• NOTICE Oi bRAFT PFAIOi Iiol dated damages and not RrFY must accompany each MOBILITY SCOOTERS -Pride N lIH'eceTol�w.y 4erk at Townes AND REQUEST FOR PUeltt The prmdt appButlon file and as penalty. Bid. and must be In the form GOGos 3B"GOT 1. E-2 dis- Flag, 1 S. SewalFs Point Road, COMMENT zupporUrg d la are ewllable fan AIA Document A110 Bid a bly for trawl. Other SewalFs Point, Florida. Any fm public inspection during The Cou eve resarves the right BorM properly x ted byy models avell. Like ! Pert. pe W. to Q alify as The Department of Environ- nortrol business Fpurs. 8:00 to dela .X g o the Can- the Bidder ant bbyy aaualiRd cond. from $4.0"a" 772 -577 -date must beua regis- mental PrOtecllon (Depart- 'i to 5:00 0.mC Monday tract tar a period of ninety zurdy, cerlifittl heck 17. BEA 9H.21 ID 2007197 f¢rcoed ester of the Town. me^U glues nonce of draft through Fr(ea�. ex epi legal @g) days after the bid open- or a cashiers check. drawn National Pollutant Disd.araac holidays, by Map arrange- Try, to waive IMormalities in M bank authorized to do LaHsha Q. Burch, LMC Elimination System (NPDI:S) is wdth Ms. Cerra Rob- bid, or reject arty or ag badness in the State of Flod- iseellaneous Town Clerk ppee It renewal (DEP FileMu No Inco Department of EE in whole or In Part Nth da. Bl dsecurltymuslbeln the Pub: ame J and IQ 2018 FLR0IEON-0DI) for the Manic- n tat Protection. NPOES without wase/or to accept sum of not less than Five Per- CANPER (PULL•BEHIXO) 2s' - TCN 1029S1J 1pa1 Separate Storm Sews storrnwater Proggram 1600 fhc bid Nat, {n Its judgement t (S%) of Ne total amount Oft Hi{ave Ex. Cod. SI 1,500 System (MSO /or Town of Blair Stores Roof. Talp has- ypg carve tbe hast Interest of i the bid, made pa ble to Firm. Q72)77a-1850 sewdl'S PoInL Florida 32199.2100. phone Indian River county. Florida. Indian River County Board of blit Notices azin¢nber@50)715-752]. Pub: Thetaunty will not rdmbWse CmmtyC. Snopers. In the The renewal permit rcpulrc- lune 3.7018 an Hlddcr (or bid preparation eventlhe Contract is awarded Usual NOTICE OF PUBIIt HEARING is apply to the Ieentl- TCN 2029555 y tied Dermlfee's MSI cots. to the Bidder, Bidder VAl enter Nance of a public headrg to fir^ In a Contract with the County PMMO•BABY GRAXO-Froazis consider a petition for the Within thdr pnsdMion The CquCSt for Bldg AMANADORY Pre -Hie Confer- and furnish Nercpaired 100% Bacon. wht,iwrykeys, good dostrg, abandonment and enewal p¢mdt requlr¢s the willbe held on Wdnm- Pub lic construction flood cod.5800 (773)589.2377 yawtlon of two 20' ?d- I aper ersus gaen�1a rmm AMID T6EYENT AN RIVER G�t7n S dayy, lurre 13. 1018 at 10:00 wkhln the tlmdrome Set by pea' ¢ mens s shown Includlnq: best mana0emenl ference the Publk Warks pen- the Co.mty. if Bidder talk to cols o aided plat for V"Ila�e p [ices, conhol lttMiquez, scaled bids will be rndvd Indian room AI -3o3 of the do se, the Bid Security shall Of Kasha PD Phase IA: P al ySfem de lOn ant emineer- by Ilan River Comfy untll Indian River County Admin- be retained by the County as Book 23 Poqe5 100 • 106 (DB Cep melhpds trd the dis- 2:00 P.M. n Wednesdayy Iitratlon Building located at I�quida[d damages ant not CARPENTER TOOLS $ d.. 10 PG 11,11 OB 11 PG 38. OB 17 har a Imm Use MSN to the lune 27, 1018. Each bid shalj 1801 2734 Street. Vero Beaty. penalty. Selllny whole shop. Also PG ,17, and Dg 20PG 359).A manmum extentproctlwble be ubmitfd In se led RT rl TF1151%COONFEgENCEHCE IS The County reserves the riBhl cherry wood. (772)110-7117 n blk hearing, at whfch ver- be a,pe are shag bearatbe tl In Interest and dlizem payy interested person may name end address of the bid. REQUIRED. No bidder anlN.g to delay awarding of tbe Con- AaR haw an ovvertunity to yMl written comments on der on the outside and the (ter tbe meeting has 2 tract fora Gonad of ninety he heard, , 11 be Add by the the ero(I permift to the D¢ rt• words `SEBASTIAN CORNERS will be cal to sign In. The (90) aaYs Uttar Ne baa epen- nrsolrr)cerr)errtslO Board of LountV ComMsslon- t or may vbmlt a written ROOF REPLACEMENT and Hid fadlity pen 6e Nzited imine• Ing, to Nalw InfarmaliUes In rs of Treflan Iver County. �u est fora public m¢drg ROOF 8067-. Bids should id diatdy lollowlr S th meet4o. �.Y bbl. Or rejed any or all J Florida in the Countyy Commis- fo MS Cierra Roblmen.Fbrida ddressdto Purchazbg DlN- bids In whole or In OartN ton Chambers of tM Countyy Ocparlm¢nt al ErMro menta sloe 1800 ,1734 Sh?t Vero INDIAN RIVER CWNTY without wuse/or ( pt Adminkt_t"euildirg.low[- Protection, NPDES Stormwa- Beach. Florida 3,1960. All bids tbe hid that in Its judgemen4 nnouncements d at 1801 0. Str?t, Vero ler Program. 2600 Blair Stone I. be oppnod pubF and Nr So eie AH19:W, Indian River tbeausnty. Florida Beach, Florida, on Tuesday. Road, Mail Station 35115, Tal• d aloud at 3:00 P.M. All bids The County will rmt relmburso C alio Newspapers lune 19.1018 at 9:oo AM. Iahazsee. Florida 31399-2100, recetvd after 100 P.M.. on lbe pub: lun¢3,2018 any Bldderfx bid Preparation Anyorrc who wish to yyh^^'-' number @50) 245-7523. day zpeclTed above. will not TCN 1078683 Costs. Y The comrflents ar re0uest far be accepted or considered. CLASSIFIED al an deas.on whlah DEPARTMENT Dpebe ^ode at this meeting, falnufhe in/ormra�gOn swot lorlh INDIAN RIVER COUNTY A IDMOIAN YNFEY COUP S A MANDATORY Pic -Bae Coon• will need b ensure that aver- 6 Terence will be held ballm record of the proceed- below and must be re I d In PROTECT NO. IMS Wednesday. Inn 13 7Wo ns Ca11772.283.5752 n1 7 ,bow Deparhnent Oflke INDIAN RIVER COUNTY Sealed bids win be received iW P.M., In the Pull, Works Open M -F. BAM-SPM -^9s Is made which Indude5 wifhln 20 Oays of OublkaUan BID N0.20I6062 %.', tan Rhcr County unlll conference room Al -303 of the lbe testimony end evidence (Nis nonce Fanwe to sub• P.M. on Wednesdayy.lune Idian gWer Coun Admin - Please speak denriy a dis upon which tbe appeal win be colt comments or reuauest a PROIECT DESCRIPTION: 27 20.W. Each bid zha0 be Istrotlon BUlklin lotycatd al tlncnycowho. leaving you beped' publl meenngwlNinth[sNme Remowl and replacement of SU rnftted In a sealed emn. 1801 77U. StreetOVor. Beach. a de a phor.c number INDIAN RIVER COUNTY pend shall comtltlde nwaiv- edsting low sloperoe}system lope and shag bear tae name Florida. 31960. ATTENDANCE Your vett veal be r.turned I BppAN OF COUNTY COMMIS- u of arty riga[ 51Kh person at Ilan giver E- County ane address of the bldd- on AT THIS CONFERENCE HV ALL Ne order It was received. SIGNERS may haw to stNMt comments Offices at Sebastian Corners the outside and the words BIDDERS K REQUIRED. No BYs-Peter D. O'Bryan, Ghali r request a public meeting wIN a complde watertight ATLANTIC BOULEVARD person that arriveS after the Oeadlines for Tues Uum oder Rdo 67.670.555 ibri1 20 un warrontnble assem- PARKING AREA ant Bla No, ti has begun win be Fri editions are 2PM the da � lune 3. MIS Administrative Cede ({'.A1C.). bty. 7018016-. Bids beed be albwe0 to sig^ In. before publication. TCN x!20015 ddressd to Pmrhaslrg ISM - The comments or reoluest for All material and equlumeal SIDn. SSW 27th Street Vero INDIAN RIVER COUNTY Deadline /or Sat edition i 0 Dublic mcetirg must contain famished and all work Per Beach. Florida 32960. Alf bids 12 -noon, Fd the lallowinO lni?ormatlon: for bele strict azcor• will be ooe�ed pubfidy and By:lennifu Hyde Notice of a public hearing to (a) The me tlrg party dance with the plans. sped• read aloud at 7.roD PP.M All bids pu Vng Marmger Deadline for Sun edition I consider pelltion for the e, addreszn and tele- ties. s. and c nt?cI doc- ivedafter 2410 P.M.. on the IPM. Fri dozing. bnndanment. d phone number the ppii- omens pe talning thereto, day ._.,fled nbeue, WN net Putt• lupe 3, M18 tion of the pertlon of 4Ih t•z n d ad.fresz. t�pies of Me eocuments are be aoceptd or wrtsidered. TCN 2022691 Deadlim for Mon eQnon I Street SWM t of 39th the Department Permit Num- a ilable al: demand. T:30PM, Fd Court SW south Lot I5. Block bei, ad the ceunty In wtddf tnrtom or b� Mace the INDIAN RIVER COUNTY REQUEST TOR STATEMENTS A d rrorth a1 Lat 1, Block H the fadlity Is lawtd' Purdwln' D vision t (777) PROJECT N0. IRC•1719 OF QDAMMATIGNS (oeadMe.-kvb (sone WaklD's Way subdivi- (b) A rtatement of Ines ant 776-1116 puRhasing@Ire- IN011N RIVER COUNTY 'res Pd MYayO sIon, per Indian River Coun- when rwtice of the droit per- gov com. All other wmmunl- BID NO. 26fa616 RW A7o1a012 ty Pia M' Book 13, Paya It was receive0: canons conceMng Nis bid CoaU^afny Geotechnical Other beadPoes: pubik headng• at wldN Isar- Cc) A description f no- shall b directd to IRC Pur• PROIECT DESCRIPTION: The SeMces far testae River Milestones 2PM TIu tie In Interest and dtlieM1i ha.g¢s Mecommentery basing DNHian at Ourchas- pro ect consists of repaving Coppty ORC•1817) Luminaries 3PM W shall have an opportunity to poses for the draft permit inq@Ircgovmm. n� nflgWing the park - Worship sw. 12PM I, be heard. Will be held by Ne ((d) A lull explataUon al the bg lot at the northeast ver- In camMp�lance, With CCNA Sec- RESource SPM T Board of County Lo mm"SSIOn- t veal and Ie9al reasons AD bidders Shan submR one nor of SR -60 and 43rd Averan, non 28 OSS Florid, sMtut Your News 11PM f M of Indian River County, for each change to Ne droit (U original ad one (p caDY Indudi drainage improv- Use vidian Rivet Cotmty Board Bargaln Box 2PM F Florida In the Count Commis- _fl by tae cam- of the Bid Proposal forms me ts. slgnlnq and pavement of CquntyCommissloners Vdunfe Ss 2PM F ion Chambers of the County ter: and GIs dd wltldn the zPoe'd. m rklrrgg , ladscapirg, d Is re0uestng SU ms of AdmlMstrotion Building, beat- a If desird, a request that wtlorls. %ease note that the emovel of exhtirg monitor• OualiFiwtlons (Sops) from Go online to TFAalmsom t d at Mon 27th Street, Vero public meeting be sched• Qlceztionwlre must be filled Ing wells. gIW.Ud firms for conllnuinq Place Bargain Boz ads FREE each Florida. on Tuesday, rid inducting a statement out comPlof y Indln7 the prafessiondgeotechnicalzer- Iunel9,2018a19:0oAM. of I. naNre of tlm issues F.nandaI stntemenL BID SEC U- All material and ui ment vices A --k 0 O TCrA1.A9 , • • - •-- 6 E Place your ad with us. Calf 1-8 T7-202407 dun Care/Services ean!ng SerWceS Vadors/Builders ome Maint./Repair � ooang CNA LILLM CLEANING FA NOW HONE REPAIRS! D&R RESCREENING JOSE ROCNA ROOF LEAKS A REPAIRS Is- crywMeelxrly. Sometimes Lme Day! =-. bda Da do Resueenl Wlianow C.."vedon urndYr.rs-Demcnt;4rqht SERVICES Fen«s7eerks:tteaeayPmsrmna wmaw.urrv.Kkk Pl+�r. LAWN Same Ga seMce. Nouss �ip)l]y �YsRllgnh `=` Ic Too%o lint deem 1MutMU� s/ubl..e(tshlmeb: 6pehw Loom WLMowrcPalr. Sr ossco nts.Free Elst tGJly Work GVara^ted. 1]]] I] 6G� n.0!BLwerkNs Mee. ibnrinp ynvrvwr kasaNCJpisc/AMY n2.]II-2Ta7T`t `S76 SLC Call (771)67&8567 EXCELLENT CNA! Omsse S5 NlnesnPe(:n'eviirrs mst,lke: us.yms an wnvo-wx ro prowde xrsmw?re, Rus wash DRYWALL REPAIR gal/Investigate Sue homrmeker/cwnpudamAlp sir. anup/Hau!ing ]7)-lnaiifip Gays THOMPSON'S Mas. LVlsame LUrs Poaorn removal.SmmNceuhp M. Is, SL-(S6UM625? "' K.mckd krtvrc. ROOFING DIVISION TDANIEVS HAULING uc 7n•34i-5965 ms Divorce s19s• Immlgfanon Provides enpert scrvke 8 D� �Nad Alt rras4era:hh,, )Pok. JOHNSON UCL uwwM6 PSL9161 00 7705 wLrrantYSan your repairs. YOUR LOVED ONE? AnyNieepp-Wrape/Sned J Rem odd, Rewln,CaroeMry, 7723611 -0E06 -@Cap pen Too ChOiu Prhate Care. .Oearout]daysaw?k Ream Nms. alsoFIXING? -1 'usneeeu2]mwrneaos°1�9w we haw CNAs/HHAs xlyymy p15k M_c_(771)E127500 4mae?Paflesl0rlrr.V+ra Master Gr enter -30 rs exp: a55age/Re11e%OlOgy skilled.'anestd deyyedab - lk 772-672-17531ns Gown, cabt.sets. lnterio idm o IL Ito 11 Ars, Affuda0l IxkRepairamtsc re air CRC1331168 ASA PASSAGE BY MSA ?ie:aeon: ]7:-e]ea2Do. [e-vanotion RIT-0dEI ioitCorM/Heating CLOCKSBYHOLLISRoanAdditb__ ur7f i pmkrTpue9n nasnsun DENNIS KILEY TIIFRrpaira5aha772A19-28301Al ERICS HOME REPAIR (s6q]aT�mlnot INS VdlaOe Green Oc itehe's flooring, painting All ofhmrepairs-W w70erAIRSOURCE1 Put SL Wd (3)3)135-360] ripe sindswoof(Ls, drywa3, wixs,�rNFESe I PeFPR srrwcr w6� decks bethrmms, Boors, eieFres est 1AAA MOWNGAn cUwckyourA/C Pute SW CBs ool erKl6aWe rosue<ns. Lk/O)s. ACOC7509155 I s Perla sass ARSON'S DISCOUNT HOME NewC 157-d7oM lee (772)460-1116uJ No fob too small! First 7r s76N UAIc C_et_ot5n5_ t)Ulns floor speGal, 475/hr P 3Ell CE COMPUTER SERVICE -- OtM, Servkes PexkSPedalist Show Pan t VourServlce 4krosolt-GrL 1oyu'bap ego- ®w/2 -hr min. in Indian Remlacemen[Durth un. SEEKING INVENTORY fnU QS•7667 ectricProwders r�REBPIAIER OLSMAELTNOINE]River CO. 772-321-3680 EEKIGINVEORFIXALLCOMPUTER ELECTRICIAN FOR HIRE 772480-8076 111 TaeuPROBLEMS FOR LESS SeMce workTroMle Sn`oD,.P idings lan rMx ainting Se)vlcesmp Ca06rianat O7)YD1-ants t`Ox Nowa ON Werk BetMrtyxsofsea fro. rrsSt(niij ympourReanarironr� or._. res was4err A.A.W. PAINTING ee Servlees kss at4wZu do tubdn0 eie 772.717 -lees Lkd sou Only! Pax, lash Etr t/FIo Covering bw?tr. rrN3aIS— -- arr,:w"re"s7asn Ans4 AFFORDABLE TREE u rearsen: IR emntr SeMceaLot4wrl HINTON'S CARPET rscrete/MazonryWo ome MalntJRepalr 21x•7228 FrimMrg, Stump Grid�ig, BLUE WATER Re.naval: uanro CLEANING ABEE RENOVanoN, IRRIGAMN DON TIDEY REPAINTS 77D320.4567 m SL MC l Rooms, f1041st flow ALL CONCRETE ADDFIION."St ODEMNG Sprinklers• Clocks• Duality Guaronted TneaorWlckanmp awilnble Drlveways/PatiQa/ RncAem bath, pdndeq. fexJn`. Pumps&Tuns— FREE Estimates 77z -s ii -o7 IRB RrlrYpawrs/Bl0.h rxnarer.maDr. cper lerey )�bslx-net �a ue sPold3i LTREE TRIh1a11Nc� A S C ibA� oAom COM.tutbn 0be616 pku9n:. ticlm�7>?-z4s-¢fs 77b42.S-2205 Mcstro D REaIOVAL INS eeY669s rest AA RESCREENING Servie QUALffY PAINTING s•d. FreeEsnmat¢z.iJERRY RIPPLE (ovmstPriceseuaro^teee BY KEN INC tusrL Part St. Lucie; F-snmate. Lknl95l STUCCO 5.a t9SF+36Yrsnte ALL YOUR 26 772-263-»46_-- j 772371-6353 ry merAVNeskeMlal years."-`.? - o`NinwPn.Iyrsrrxdrax a«nadamnrrd LANDSCAPING NEEDS Noaeeoosman leaning Services lkxns)@(772)561.6392 ��7T2-�'� M�pwweel.lYseMce W�DOIT ALL I. NING55ERVICES,INC. Rpn nli)NI Y69 CAR 7n.1y6�n TrimM &Remowl. 8urk1 DR CLEAN SERVICES JOHNNY'S �B. 5.13.E n -.TZ etrucks. F"reWrood Lk.1600)SO Holbs.Awnsd. Concrete, Driveways, Nom ImOroveme ls/Pcpai s/ ----------- 5674715 or nwserlewr.p, wtnaawr. I— &PAI -Re pairs.Carpentry. Malate?n %Remodel GARDENER oofi Mono 7R-03.8076 IRKL A s more. Cao ]]).3641197 New or Old Ur/Ins pMCNS6697 1 -free Est Seb.Ava. UcAns CAST M-672-4353 Can Car[os (T)D 2064515.0 �.-.:-,,.�, wt%IifN3 Rooffnqq COntrAdor HUSBAND/WIFEW.IFwm7 Contra bre, PHIWPS TREE YY C jCO�TNU w paks SERVICE DIP HOME CLEANING SRVC Pnuo:, s"eewatksa Pool Enebspres, Rescreen, GARDENIA LAWN SE Ins. ServI M9P Y:rIMa.dtt ask eenerM eontroctlnpMaulmp/ We also do Windows Pressure. 07ivewars Uc nI999 Ins-1.=Rlfln Ree Eftlmatei Ut.alm. CovMy ewrloyeary bemnlition: free Est 0roda wroet dean UNns gYrArkmnvete.cam Abml"mR Palm trlmmf 772-216-75U gent SyarrartV b.tnegWnesz R?sonsble: wt Bran Owned 772766]171 (772) 6334657 IR 7)Nze-0Tm,Jr(.wunIi., sl /A1C Ua.R[aozb)ls mit)TKnt L.rS 712-x6.1976 Au 1R m-1 0A INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA MEMORANDUM TO: Jason E. Brown; County Administrator THROUGH: Stan Boling, AICP; Community Development Director THROUGH: John W. McCoy, AICP; Chief, Current Development FROM: Ryan Sweeney; Senior Planner, Current Development DATE: June 11, 2018 SUBJECT: Henry Collier and William Anderson's Request for Abandonment of a Portion of 4th Street SW within the Waldo's Way Subdivision [ROWA-18-01-01 / 93090035- 80435] It is requested that the data herein presented be given formal consideration by the Board of County Commissioners at its regular meeting of June 19, 2018. DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS: Henry Collier and William Anderson are requesting abandonment of the portion of 4th Street SW lying west of 39th Court SW, south of Lot 15, Block A, and north of Lot 1, Block B of the Waldo's Way Subdivision. The single-family subdivision is located on the north side of 5th Street SW, approximately 1,200 feet east of 43`a Avenue (see attachment 2). The subject right-of-way was dedicated as a future potential subdivision roadway interconnection to the adjacent property to the west which was vacant at the time Waldo's Way Subdivision was platted in 1989. However, when the adjacent property to the west was developed and platted as the Moss Pointe Subdivision in 1998, that subdivision design did not include a corresponding roadway interconnection. Therefore, the subject right-of-way is a short, dead end road that no longer provides for a future interconnection. The applicants own the abutting lots (Lot 15, Block A and Lot 1, Block B), and have requested that the subject portion of right-of-way be abandoned. If the right-of-way is abandoned, the right-of-way will be divided evenly between the two adjacent lot owners, and each lot owner will gain 30 feet of additional property (60 feet total). No other property owners will be affected by the proposed abandonment. As required by the County land development regulations (LDRs), prior to the Technical Review Committee (TRC) meeting at which the subject application was reviewed, staff notified each property owner adjacent to the subject right-of-way by regular mail. Staff has received no objections regarding the request. At this time, the applicants request that the subject right-of-way be abandoned. 155 ANALYSIS: Consistent with guidelines established by the BCC, this petition was reviewed by all County divisions and utility providers having jurisdiction or potential interests within the subject right-of- way. Upon review, the County Public Works Department advised that there are existing 25 foot wide drainage and utility easements that run along the rear of all lots within the subdivision, and those easements were dedicated to the County. Therefore, the Public Works Department recommends that a 25 foot wide drainage and utility easement be retained along the west 25 feet of the subject right- of-way (to align with the existing rear lot easements), and a 25 foot wide drainage and utility easement be retained along the north 25 feet of the subject right-of-way in order to provide access from the subdivision road (391h Court SW) to the rear lot easements. Also upon review, the County Department of Utility Services advised that there is an existing water main located along the north end of the subject right-of-way, and that the proposed 25 foot wide drainage and utility easement requested by Public Works will also provide sufficient easement protection over the existing water main. Therefore, the County Department of Utility Services concurs with retaining a 25 foot wide drainage and utility easement along the north 25 feet of the subject right-of-way. Lastly, Florida Power & Light (FPL) and Comcast advised that they have utility improvements located along the front 10 feet of all lots within the subdivision, and recommend that a 10 foot wide drainage and utility easement be retained along the east 10 feet of the subject right-of-way. All recommended easements have been included in the proposed abandonment resolution (see attachment 4). All other County divisions and jurisdictional agencies have reviewed and approved the proposed abandonment without conditions. The subject right-of-way is not part of the roadway system as noted on the County Thoroughfare Plan, and is not needed for the thoroughfare system. Furthermore, the abandonment will not affect the right of convenient access to any surrounding properties. It should be noted that the subject right- of-way has been improved with asphalt pavement and the above -referenced water main (see attachment 3), and the applicants do not intend to remove any of the existing improvements or close access to the existing improvements. The County Attorney's Office has reviewed and approved the attached abandonment resolution for legal form and sufficiency. RECOMMENDATION: Based on the analysis provided in staff's report, staff recommends that the Board abandon its rights to the subject right-of-way and authorize the chairman to execute the proposed abandonment resolution, with the following conditions, as addressed in the proposed abandonment resolution: 1. A 25 foot wide drainage and utility easement shall be retained along the west end of the subject right-of-way. 2. A 25 foot wide drainage and utility easement shall be retained along the north end of the subject right-of-way. 156 2 3. A 10 foot wide drainage and utility easement shall be retained along the east end of the subject right-of-way. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Application 2. Location Map 3. Aerial 4. Abandonment Resolution 157 p f _p f PETITION FOR �p OCT? Oi7 ABANDONMENT OF PUBLICLY DEDICATEETy RIGHTS-OF-WAY, STREET, OR ALLEYl��D u' ielvL S . ��c r S 3 hereby petitio*�' ,Indian4River o �' to (Print 1611 name) l JJi' '�, 6 % J,, U1, t...) es + 3q"", Co L)r+ S u3 (street, alley, road, etc.) (subdivision name, pel ID#, or tract) G -a 7-1 S q s.Lt/' located in starting at and terminating at laying adjacent to (or in) Block �, Lot Section , Section J Township 3 Range , as recorded in Plat Book�Page , Public Records of Indian River County, Florida. Applicants Name lease Prim f�t�� y L ��P it/�� �t� S. A le r Address: 3 ES 3 % S �tlZ 4(c 3q+ k C G✓ Teleph . L'1Z-.20 -25-50- E-mail:L,� e -' r' Si ature:<� Y Xv1 I i",, - ate / List of property owners abutting the portion of the road requested to be vacated (if any): Name (Please Print): / Al r S 0 Address: Telephone: E-mail: hfa acs f -us Q_o 1 _ C a ,nom , Name (Please Print): 14C ►i 0 ft. L, Co /h e r - Telephone: E-mail: Name (Please Print): Address: Telephone: E-mail: Name (Please Print): Address: Telephone: E-mail: 158 1801271 Street, Vero Beach FL 32960 F:\Community Development\APPLICATIONS\CurDev applications\rightofwayabandonment(neH2O16).doc 2 1 I MS 0S H.16S O O a MS 10 Hi 6£ —� "4 ro x N Q Q MS /t'dHIO ti a g ry a a a Ni a 0 Poo B O 4 a p4 g � pQQ G LLLL9�9 K7 a � � O - a a o a $ a S2 $ M a a A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, PROVIDING FOR THE CLOSING, ABANDONMENT, VACATION AND DISCONTINUANCE OF THE PORTION OF 4TH STREET SW RIGHT-OF-WAY LYING WEST OF 39TH COURT SW, SOUTH OF LOT 15, BLOCK A, AND NORTH OF LOT 1, BLOCK B OF THE WALDO' S WAY SUBDIVISION AS SHOWN IN PLAT BOOK 13, PAGE 11 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, AS DESCRIBED HEREIN; SAID ABANDONMENT SUBJECT TO RETAINING SEVERAL DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTS. WHEREAS, on October 16, 2017, Indian River County received a duly executed and documented petition from Henry Collier and William Anderson requesting that the County close, vacate, abandon, discontinue, renounce, and disclaim any right, title, and interest of the County and the public in and to the portion of 4th Street SW lying west of 39th Court SW, south Lot 15, Block A, and north of Lot 1, Block B of the Waldo's Way Subdivision, per Plat Book 13, Page 11, of the Public Records of Indian River County, Florida; and WHEREAS, in accordance with Florida Statutes 336.10, notice of a public hearing to consider said petition was duly published; and WHEREAS, after consideration of the petition, supporting documents, staff investigation and report, and testimony of all those interested and present, the Board finds that the subject right- of-way is not a state or federal highway, not located within any municipality, not necessary for continuity of the County's street and thoroughfare network, and does not provide exclusive access to any private property; and WHEREAS, the Board finds that a 25 foot wide drainage and utility easement shall be retained along the west end of the subject right-of-way, a 25 foot wide drainage and utility easement shall be retained along the north end of the subject right-of-way, and a 10 foot wide drainage and utility easement shall be retained along the east end of the subject right-of-way. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA that: All right, title and interest of the County and the public in and to that certain right-of-way segment more particularly described as follows: COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 1, BLOCK B, WALDO'S WAY SUBDIVISION, THENCE N OOD 14'04"W ALONG THE WESTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF 39TH COURT S.W. A DISTANCE OF 80.10 FEET TO THE RIGHT OF WAY POINT OF CURVATURE AND THE POINT OF BEGINNING. THENCE ALONG SAID CURVE BEING CONCAVE TO THE SOUTHWEST, HAVING A RADIUS OF 25 FEET AND A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 89D45'56", A DISTANCE OF 39.17 FEET TO THE POINT OF TANGENCY ON THE RIGHT OF WAY OF 4TH. ST. S.W., THENCE ON A BEARING OF DUE WEST (89D59'60" PER PLAT) ALONG THE SOUTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY OF 4TH. ST. S.W. A DISTANCE OF 109.09 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 1, BLOCK B, THENCE N OOD14'04"W 161 ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE OF WALDO'S WAY SUBDIVISION, A DISTANCE OF 60 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 15, BLOCK A, THENCE DUE EAST (N89D59'60"E PER PLAT) ALONG THE NORTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY OF 4TH. ST. S.W. A DISTANCE OF 108.98 FEET, TO THE RIGHT OF WAY POINT OF CURVATURE, THENCE ALONG SAID CURVE BEING CONCAVE TO THE NORTHWEST, HAVING A RADIUS OF 25 FEET AND A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 90D14'04" A DISTANCE OF 39.37 FEET TO THE POINT OF TANGENCY ON THE WESTERLY RIGHT OF WAY OF 39TH. COURT S.W., THENCE SOOD04'04"E ALONG SAID WESTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE, A DISTANCE OF 110 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. Lying and being in Indian River County, Florida, is hereby forever closed, abandoned, renounced, disclaimed, and vacated except that a 25 foot wide drainage and utility easement shall be retained along the west end of the subject right-of-way, a 25 foot wide drainage and utility easement shall be retained along the north end of the subject right-of-way, and a 10 foot wide drainage and utility easement shall be retained along the east end of the subject right-of-way. (see Exhibit A attached) 2. The closing, vacation, and abandonment of these portions of public right-of-way is in the best interests of the public. 3. Notice of the adoption of this resolution shall be forthwith published once within thirty (30) days from the date of adoption hereof. 4. The Clerk is hereby directed to record this resolution together with the proofs of publication required by Florida Statutes 336.10 in the Official Record Books of Indian River County without undue delay. 5. The right-of-way shall revert equally to the properties on either side of the subject right- of-way within Block A and Block B of the Waldo's Way Subdivision. The foregoing resolution was offered by Commissioner who moved its adoption. The motion was seconded by Commissioner , and upon being put to a vote, the vote was as follows: Chairman Peter D. O'Bryan Vice Chairman Bob Solari Commissioner Susan Adams Commissioner Joseph E. Flescher Commissioner Tim Zorc 162 The Chairman thereupon declared the resolution duly passed and adopted this day of , 2018. M. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA Peter D. O'Bryan, Chairman ATTEST: Jeffrey R. Smith, Clerk of Court and Comptroller Deputy Clerk I HEREBY CERTIFY that on this day, before me, and officer duly authorized in this State and County to take acknowledgments, personally appeared , and as Chairman of the Board of County Commissioners and Deputy Clerk, respectively, to me known to be the persons described in and who executed the foregoing instrument and they acknowledged before me that they executed the same. WITNESS my hand and official seal in the County and State last aforesaid this day of , 2018. APPROVED AS TO LEGAL SUFFICIENCY i Dylan Reingold, County Attorney APPROVED AS TO PLANNING MATTERS : Stan Boling, AICP, Director Community Development Department Notary Public 163 SHEET 1 OF 2 PURPOSE SKETCH Exhibit A NOT VALID WITHOUT THE AND DESCRIPTION: SKETCH ON SHEET 2 OF 2 TO ABANDON THE PLATTED 60 FOOT WIDE RIGHT OF WAY OF 4TH ST. S.W. FROM THE WESTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF 39TH. COURT S.W. TO THE WESTERLY LINE OF WALDO'S WAY SUBDIVISION LEGAL DESCRIPTION: COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 1, BLOCK B, WALDO'S WAY SUBDIVISION, THENCE NO' 14'04"W ALONG THE WESTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF 39TH. COURT S.W. A DISTANCE OF 80.10 FEET TO THE RIGHT OF WAY POINT OF CURVATURE AND THE POINT OF BEGINNING. THENCE ALONG SAID CURVE BEING CONCAVE TO THE SOUTHWEST, HAVING A RADIUS OF 25 FEET AND A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 89'45'56", A DISTANCE OF 39.17 FEET TO THE POINT OF TANGENCY ON THE RIGHT OF WAY OF 4TH. ST. SOUTHWEST, THENCE ON A BEARING OF DUE WEST (N89 -59'60"W PER PLAT) ALONG THE SOUTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY OF 4TH. ST. SOUTHWEST A DISTANCE OF 109.09 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 1, BLOCK B, THENCE N00' 14'04"W ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE OF WALDO'S WAY SUBDIVISION, A DISTANCE OF 60 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 15, BLOCK A, THENCE DUE EAST (N89°59'60"E PER PLAT) ALONG THE NORTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY OF 4TH; ST. SOUTHWEST A DISTANCE OF 108.89 FEET, TO THE RIGHT OF WAY POINT OF CURVATURE, THENCE ALONG SAID CURVE BEING CONCAVE TO THE NORTHWEST, HAVING A RADIUS OF 25 FEET AND A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 90'14'04" A DISTANCE OF 39.37' TO THE POINT OF TANGENCY ON THE WESTERLY RIGHT OF WAY OF 39TH. COURT SOUTHWEST, THENCE S00`04' 14"E ALONG SAID WESTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE, A DISTANCE OF 110 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. THE ABOVE ABANDONED RIGHT OF WAY IS SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING EASEMENTS: THE WESTERLY 25 FEET FOR DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT. THE EASTERLY 10 FEET FOR DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT THE NORTHERLY 25 FEET FOR DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT. DRAWN BY: C.J.C. THIS SURVEY PERFORMED BY.• PREPARED FOR: DATE: 4/10/2018 COONEY SURVEYING & WILLIAM ANDERSON CHECKED By. C.J.C. MAPPING, LLC L.B. #8070 HENRY COLLIER SHEET 1 OF 2 456 Chaloupe TerraceSebastian, FI. 32958 772-913-5322 cooneymop®gmail.com QM S 164 S--23-1Ali NOT VALID WITHOUT THE SIGNATURE AND THE ORIGINAL RAISED Christopher J. Cooney Professional Surveyor & SEAL OF A FLORIDA LICENSED SURVEYOR AND MAPPER .- Mapper /j6077 PROFESSIONAL SURVEYOR AND MAPPER IN RESPONSIBLE CHARGE GOONEY to 456 Chostun, pe Terrace2958CHRISTOPHER Sebastian, Fl. 32958 J. COONEY FLORIDA CERTIFICATE NO. 6077 SURVEYING AND MAPI07C 80 3-5322 cooneymopg. �7-~ % S DATE AND SIGNATURE QM S 164 S--23-1Ali SKETCH OF DESCRIPTION (NOT A SURVEY) SEE LEGAL DESCRIPTION ON SHEET 1 OF 2 H U WALDO'S WAY SUBDIVISION A39.37' R25.00' LOT #15 A D90'14'04' 25.00'—I BLK. A O.U.E. 1.0.00' D.I.I.E. . (OCCUPIED) �(X, TN 89.59'60" E(P) (DUE EAST 108.89' ORTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY UNE P.C. ZO n. S.W. CORN LOT 15, BLOCK A I n F- 3 I 25.00'I D.U.E. g V) o o I W ^ o _ iii 0 W 4TH. ST. S.W. 60' '< < Q cn Z60' R/w o 25.00--1 Q D.U.E. bo ♦- .W. CORER LOT 1, BLOCK B to Q RCE R RANGE SOUTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY UNE P -T•\ ! ! W O 109.09' N 89.59'60' W(P) LL P.O.B. PORJT OF BEGINNING —(DUE WEST) p -� 10.00' A39.17' \ D.U.E. R25.00' W Z W 25.00'-- LOT #1 A 089'45'56" BLK. 8 U D.U.E. (OCCUPIED) P.B. I-- j W 0 Z P.C.C. POINT OF COMPOUND CURVE 1 z LLJ :3 v �o J RLS REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR 3 ofI ! 0 L. 100 0 W H O.U.E. DRAINAGE & URUTY .EASEMENT 3-_ W 0 O K I� P.U.E. PUBLIC vnUTY EASEMENT J L.A.E. LIMITED ACCESS EASEMENT I O W Iz ; S.E. CORNER LOT 1, BLOCK B. �. SHEET 2 OF 2 NOT VAUD 1LATHOUT THE INFORMATION ON SHEET 1 OF 2 0 40 80 SCALE: 1" =40' IFIFi r) RnnK- m, P.T. I.A.E. 0.00' D.U.E. Zt Ln F- C) U' O 2 `O rn r7 00' LA.E. I _ -j BLK. BLOCK P.O.C. PCP PERMANENT CONTROL. POINT 5/10/18 PER COMMENTS IO IDENTIFICATION Christopher J. Caa^er Surveyor 8 (P) PIAT NO, vn00 x'. THDU7 iHF SIGNq TIRE arJD iJiF ORIG!rJgL RAISCU (M) MEASURED (C) CALCULATED B.M. BENCHMARK F.F.E FINISHED FLOOR ELEVATION 456 to Terrace PB PIAT BOOK FItCFESSIONAL SG'RVFYDR AND MAPPER W RESPONSIBLE CHARGE f TO?JR J. GOONEr FLDRlDA ',�j��,+��� ORB OFFICIAL RECORD BOOK PG PAGE R/W RIGHT OF WAY SEC/S SECTION 772-913-5322 TWP/T 10"SHIP r� 6 LIW /`' S"" L.2"2 V! 8. RCE R RANGE Gtj GOVORNMENT LAT C. POINT OF COMMENCEMEM P.O.B. PORJT OF BEGINNING C.B. CHORD BEARING W& CH CHORD R RADIUS OF CURVE G (DELTA)CEN71RAL ANGLE OF CURVE A LENGTH OF ARC P.C. POINT OF CURVATURE P.T. POINT OF TANGENCY P.R.C. POINT OF REVERSE CURVE P.C.C. POINT OF COMPOUND CURVE P.L POINT OF INTERSECTION PLS .PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR RLS REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR PSM PROFESSIONAL SURVEYOR & MAPPER LBLICENSED BUSINESS O.U.E. DRAINAGE & URUTY .EASEMENT P.U.D.E. PUBLIC UTILITY & DRAINAGE EASEMENT U.E. UTILITY EASEMENT P.U.E. PUBLIC vnUTY EASEMENT L.A.E. LIMITED ACCESS EASEMENT RsuOYAIAIJ : JVl7 # Ity–UUt)KW FLOOD ZONE x FLOINSURA W CE 12061C356H 12/4/12 5/10/18 PER COMMENTS Christopher J. Caa^er Surveyor 8 NO, vn00 x'. THDU7 iHF SIGNq TIRE arJD iJiF ORIG!rJgL RAISCU 5/21/18 PER COMMENTS Mapper Mapper LS #6077er $EAL OF A FLOWDA UCENSED >'Uh'ErOR Ar, M4PPEa At I& GOONEY 456 to Terrace FItCFESSIONAL SG'RVFYDR AND MAPPER W RESPONSIBLE CHARGE f TO?JR J. GOONEr FLDRlDA ',�j��,+��� stldOupe Sebastian, Fl. 32958 77 C_RTIFICATE NO. 6017 SURVEYING AND M"PLEI/807 772-913-5322 r� 6 LIW /`' S"" L.2"2 V! 8. 165 eoonsymapOgmail.com .� ' d E 4>;D SIG AT E June 19, 2018 Collier & Anderson Right -of -Way Abandonment Board of County Commissioners June 19, 2018 10.A.2. `(� j- 1 June 19, 2018 Sketch. of Description / Easement Diagram AS9.37' Pi. . - LT 6i5. 125.00la ' -=5.00' L.A.6 c o90 . OLK. • D.U:E.. lO.Ofl'D.U:E. (OCCU.oIED) .(DUE Ems'. . v.� 108.89" :..Ntt 7 3�1F?3,€kEtf : �i�BLt,"; ° :: ?t t 0.00' D.U.E. Q;.,'.q?r'Et'4i:EEflkil':y4:R:::;::............ N { tn.� '.........::.:':::............................::::.......:.;; 4. v aE€a'Qj 4TH. ST S.1"!. a N 6 � 60 P,/W ( a ♦•- 0 •' !H ER LOT (X_ t,7 SOiITlL'RlY RIGHI OF'WAY UNE P.T: Q 109.09" N 9.39'60" W(Q) _ _ . WE (OU__S'� 10:00' / M . p U.I A39iT J� 10T:�1. �D95'45'S5' Buc B 5.00' L.A.E. - Q.U.E (OCCUPIED) . P.O.gg: i'.0 F. -Z 3 . LLJ _Z J D: L W g Ip y y I I$ 4 Analysis • Not needed for access • Improved with asphalt pavement and water main stub • No physical changes proposed to existing improvements • 3 different drainage and utility easements being retained to continue existing subdivision easements and/or protect existing utility improvements Staff Recommendation ➢ That the BCC abandon the subject right-of-way by authorizing the chairman to execute the proposed abandonment resolution, including retaining all necessary easements. 5 6 June 19, 2018 10.A.2. I Q5- 3 Treasure Coast Newspapers I TCPALM� Indian River Press Journal 1801 U.S. 1, Vero Beach, FL 32960 AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF INDIAN RIVER Before the undersigned authority personally appeared, Natalie Zollar, who on oath says that she is Classified Inside Sales Manager of the Indian River Press Journal, a daily newspaper published at Vero Beach in Indian River County, Florida: that the attached copy of advertisement was published in the Indian River Press Journal in the following issues below. Affiant further says that the said Indian River Press Journal is a newspaper published in Vero Beach in said Indian River County, Florida, and that said newspaper has heretofore been continuously published in said Indian River County, Florida, daily and distributed in Indian River County, Florida, for a period of one year next preceding the first publication of the attached copy of advertisement; and affiant further says that she has neither paid or promised any person, firm or corporation any discount, rebate, commission or refund for the purpose of securing this advertisement for publication In the said newspaper. The Indian River Press Journal has been entered as Periodical Matter at the Post Offices in Vero Beach, Indian River County, Florida and has been for a period of one year next preceding the first publication of the attached copy of advertisement. Customer Ad Number Cooyline PO JJ 463755 - INDIAN RIVER COUNTY PLANNING/CDD 2027670 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Notice of a Pub Dates June 3, 2018 Sworn to and subscribed before me this day of, June 04, 2018, by ` who is Natalie Zoll (X) personally known to me or ( ) who has produced as identification. Karol Kangas U Notary Public 10 -A :1. C�5-4 KAROLEKANGAS /fvpr •. a°, Notary Public -State ofRoMa • = CommisslonfGG126041 - °q p4F My Comm.Expires Jul 29,2021 - ,a`,•'`' BondedlMaghNaUonalNourykat 10 -A :1. C�5-4 2F 1 SUNDAY, JUNE 3, 2018 1 TREASURE COAST NEWSPAPERS r tontractors/Bulldem J miture blit Nollcesc ublic Notices Cquest for Bids agues} for Bids CHEST BY HOOKER • Brand b �� (A NOW NOME REPAIRS! trol]osed l0 he talzed 1 RRY must accompany tach the meedtp. XaweVCr, the famished and all work per• new cond. brownish look. Most see! f650 (77T)N7.73U ROOM ON[e Anyone who y wkh to eppmI any declSlon, Which y Mmade at this meeting, to that Bid, end must M in the toren DepnrtmenE may not el Ways Ot en AIA Document A310 Bid Grant a repuezl for a pub Bend yr^peHy Xeculedby r^CCtl^9. There ore. _Haan (tot B1tlEU WW fomxd shall Min svictacoor• da^tt wllh the plans, 5ped- tkatlons, and contract doe• to thereto. DINING SET Dark wood drople 1 table, dz NOTICE OF E1Fe7roN WIII need ensure a Ver• batlm record Of Me pro4e d• and a ccU21IBed comments should M submit• surety. or a certified check ted wilMn TO days o/puhliu• oertalning Codes at the documrnis ore chalra w/matching hut- fet clllna cakire, Ez rnM. Ings is made vrtllch Iluludes the testimony and Cveenee or a hkr's check, drawn Non of this no ce, evan If a ny y' k authors d to do available aU www.demand- slar.eom or bpyy conuetlrl� lhC the Town of Sewall's Point (1500 obo (712)778.1850 will Mve two (2) Gommisslen apo^ Which tM Anwill be publk meeting k requested. Easiness In Me State of FIoH• Purchasing D)Nsion et (7Ii) 5Ca15 ellglble for election in � !• If a puhlk moats if Schell- da. Bid st udty must be In Me ^R wen of not less than Five Per. 226-106 or purchasing govcom All other Cam munl- 2018.Ifmore than Dve ((S) can• ewelry:COStume�ne didaes qualify for the two INDIAN RIVER COUNTY Wad. the public comment tint (59L)) ItM total amount period h Oztanded until the ( ,rye bid le ta !Ions ncernlho this bid be Directed to IRC Pur- (2) open Town Cammis'Sion E ALWArS11UYINC'COSTIIYE/7 seals tMrc wig 2-C a pHmarY be. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS made pa dose of ill public !ratan River County Board Of If a of U' meeting Is htlE. shall hasinp Dlvlsio^ at purthes- SILVERanMEIEWEUI II election. The election Call (772)529-1561 J shall be held On August M. BY s•Peter0.0'8rya^. Chairman Cquntveommiulonnrs. mthC "-rsehet the CanIrncl k awarded awrriiften imp®Ircgov.tom _ _ 2018- JOHNSON Remedtl,R� aaal Carye mm Statements end data the lM Deport• to the Bidder. Bidder will enter Ali bidders shall submit arc FINE JEWELRY WANTED: FINE J W Palm ANTED: Pub: June 3.2018 TCN 3une 3. at mcetirg nn In a COnOaU veld the Countyy meet's proposed action. As d Cu Det with th ed 10091 ep^ubec of off of end Orx <1) copy 1 the old Proposal forms 7M afoetal caudate qualify buys dealgml�xe tiquC, Ing period will bepl t noon endmodem.CaIIt561-BO1-0222 Mrouph STATE OF FLORIDA a costal! of slgnlUcant public Const ctlon Bond common! the DepartmentY yAMln tM limefrapx tat by �roydM within the spadfi- cations. Please note that tlx M^rdayy`ru^e18, 18 n. F day lune 22 I. Persons desiring to pualify DEPARTYEM Oi EIMRONYENTAL final attlon may M dillcrent the County. 11 BWdor /ash to from the ooddo taken by It do u. Hn old Security shall questionnaire must he tilled tat comdetey IMudi the rrgg ed Equ(p & Suppl`Ies ndIdate for wchelec- tiveofficemaydosnbyfiling MOBILITY SCOOTERS - Prido veld lM Town Clerk al Town PRo7EeiroN NOT DRAFT PEAIAT ANDRE FDRAFR PUBLIC g in the drat! permit DC rculnM 6 the Count Y y�i UO TM PerrNle application agWdatee damages and t p 9 penalty. doll RrerelalstalemenL010SECU- RITV t accompany each Bld, ell must be In the farm GOGos 1-a4-whl. E-2 dis- XaB. 1 S. SCwell's Point Road, /or travel. Other OYYEM SuppoWng are avallahle /or DUSInsJN:etlon 1112 The County the 1 an AIA Document A310 Bid apeHv ulCd b assembly 5ewalys Point. FloHda. Any modelsavail. like New! PoH. The Department of Errvirom reserves right rxrmal Dullness hours. B, to delay awaMirg at lM Con- and, Ma Bnd DCyy aaua118edy peen seed to qualify e5 cord. From 5400 772377• Edidate m�ilsl M a regis- menu) Protection (Dopar!- U not. 0 draft m to 5:00 0.m., Monday (roc, far a period 0} ninoty Mrough FreaY• except legal Surety, or a rertmCE cryeck 8493. B&A OH -2110 2007197 tared vete of the Town. gives National Pollutant Dlsdlargge (9p) days after tM Yd open- hdldays, by Mcg arranges im _,r al Ido lilies i MS. Gema Rob- re!ett ar a CasNCrs check, drawn cry bank a-Mr.to do Lakisha Q. Burch CMC iseellaneous Town Clerk Dimlmli0n System (NPDES) ppec it renewal (DEP Flle NO enta veld b any bid, or enyr ar all lour, Department of End- Mas In whole or in pe t veld businessIntheStaebeFloH- da. old Security must be In the Pub: lune T and l4 2018 FLROIEOtt-0Oq for the Manic• ronmental Protection. NPOES wItMW cause/nr th a<Mpt S""rowater Proggram 2600 the sum of not less than Five Per - S3 (WLL-BEHIND) 70• •. TLN 2039533 Ipe1 Separate Storm Sc-, System (MSG for Town of bid that, In Its tudgamonl Bialr Store PoaO, Tallahas• will it'. ll best in,errts(ol nl I 2-1 of MC foul amount a1 the Nd, made to i OB MIdow Ex. Cord. f11,500 Firm. (772)778.18So ® Sewalfs Point. Serve So 'bcor(SSG) 3]100.PMrx Indian River County. Florida. payaM Ilan River County Board bUe NOtiCes ThC crewelcp it r .t1,re- umber (850) 24S•27 Pub: The Ceunly wllbid County CommissI,-rs.lnthe t tM Is US1W1 NOTICE Oi PUBLIC HEARING ,S to MM6Wze TIN 202958 airy Bklder for bidprepamthn costa. Contract awarded totM eldder, Bidder will enter Notice of a public pearl [o ,i,;Pomc flees MS4 system wlMin !Mir ltMsdlUlon. The for Bids in a ConVaet with the Countyry PIAMO-BABY GRAND -Francis eider a petition for the Bacon wtlt.lvorryy keys, ggood dollttlgg, abendenment e d e veal pemdl requires tM agues AMANADORY Pre -Bid Can/er- ace will be Mld an WCdres- andfurnish Ow reuulredl00% Public Construction Bond cord. 8110 (77TI569.2311 aratlon of two 20' d- v Imple tattoo of a Storm- ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS day, lune 13, 2018 at 10:00 My.., within the timMrcme tat by way ca,' far ss as w shown -to' 5 best management water ManepemCM P77 pmIAN RTVEO COUNTY In the Publk Works cam fereree roam AI -703 of Me tM county. If Bidder faih to do u, the Bid Security shall nnrat PO P 0015 oeook i,I em deSlgnroandeeMineett by Indlan.Rivve l County U t1vI sel n IBuBOingntlm'ated let the ntd daymagpz 231 100 - 106 (08 Paper bp, k,UEw Preswre IIns6. th 1801 27M St Beach, Ruidbe aMrynot penalty. CARPENTER TOOLS &mach. 40 PO 42ined 2.08 24 PD 38. 0817 Selling whoa shop. Also PG 27, and OB 30 PG 359).A cherry wood. 07s2)410-7117 n slit hearing. et which par- �� r c Irom tM M5�4s totM req �Imrpq Cstnnl practluble -Vero lune 27. 2018. Ea Each al! 2-C submitted In sealed AT rI THIS2 CONFER END NCE NIS Fear restrVeslM Hghl TM So` Y' tl in Interest and citixem hag have an opportunity to Aqy Interested person ma y a pe and shag the oma a1d address of the hid- REQUIRED. No bidder arMng iter lM mVhas baa der VA to delay awarding of tM Can - tract for a period of Nrery Ee heard. wig M held by t10 �.___�__ Board al County CommlalOn- Mat written cam 1S nn the draft permit loth Depart• r^C^to may submit awrittrn an tM nuWde aro the I be dlnwM In sign In. The Words "SEBASTIAN CORNERS }adllty tan b<ystled Immo• vi, P00F PEPLACEMEM end old dintely following the meeting. (90) days after the bid arn- (p. to valve InlormNitles In v bid. or refect arty or ell f Indian Aver County. E� J' Florida told Co-'yy CommlS- w^ far a puNfc meetln9 to Ms. CIUrn Poblmon, Florida Np.2018067'. Bids spatia M addressed to Purch"'n" DIN- INDIAN RIVER COUNTY bids In whole er I^ put w1M without cauzC/or to aoctof site Chambers of lM CountY Aeminhtration eWldirg, brat- a.B Department of ErMronmental I. 1800 27M Street Vere Beach Fedda bids tlx bid that In Ita Iudeement. nnouncements ed nt 1801 Street, Vero Beach. Florida, on Tuesday, ProteCif , NPOES 5tomnva- ter Pr T600 Blair Stone 32960. All By le^niter Ilydo will M openM Mblidv d Purehazino Manager wlil serve the best Interest Of Indian River County, Florida. Palm J. IA 2018 at Son AM. Road, A7AIl StaOon 3585. Tal- lahaszoe, Florida read aloud at 2:00 P.M. All bids Ivo' P. Thc County WIII cot C ewspapers Anyere Wim y wish to 323932/04 nMre number X50) 215-7521. after 2AO M., onIM Pub:Jure 3.2018 day specigad above. will nal TCN 1028683 any elddm lorbld preparction Or vests. CLASSIFIED Appeal any deeizlon, which The comments ogrr doezt for ust Clinlmn heaxeded ar considered. A S A MANDATORY Pre -Bid Con- DEPARTMENT YY be made at this meelinp, uAllneedeemureMntaver- te,p:he Into set or. INDIAN RIVER COUNTY INDIANDpMp COUNTY ferexe will he held 0n cam 772-283-5252 p1 ball. rttnrd of tM preuM- blow and mtrst bo recCNCd in ,hove Department ofllce PRONC7 N0.1765 INDIAN RIVER COUNfV Sealed bids will be received W00 `PM' y, une 13 2018 at 2:00 P.M., In the Pub(Ic Works Eft I Is made which iShcdes Open M -F. SAM -SPM pgs the leztimony and evidence wllAin 70 days of puWkation 61D NO.IOIa061 by Indian PNU County unlll forcreoroom Al -303 ofIM PlCase speak tlCariy & dis �^ which the appeal will be of Ws notice fa0ure u sub- mit [ommenIS or request a 2.00 P.M. an WCdneSday, lune PROJECT DESCRIPTION: 27 2018. Eeeh hid Shall be Indian River County Admin- MIS. Bulldirg located al Unclly when losing iota fid' DUMic nreeUrq wlMinthistime Removal and redaeement of w6mitted in n seated cove- 1801 27M itreot vera Beach. res code A phone number INDIAN RIVER Your tall vNi a returned I PCtHod snail tonslllu[Cawaly- al any HBht suds Goran Cdstirg low do De roof system lope end shag hear Me name t Indian River North County M address Of the adder on Florida ]2960. ATTENDANCE AT TI(I� CONFEPENCE BY ALL BCAR4 OF COUMY CoMM15• Me ordU It was received. STONERS cosy Mve io submilcommenta Offices at Sebastian Corners the outside and the Words BIDDERS IS REQUIRED. NO BYa•Peter D.O'Htyan, Chain o equ0d a Pub meeting S(I. veld a complete watertight ATLANTIC BOULEVARD ARP personn�the! arrives after tM Deadlines,uugg eErtkns ere ]PMINe da AEm'nlstWrative C e )� and hlYycar vmrrantablc esu.• jot8o116G. elle De ABOw1 to signlegun will be before pubiiutlo0 Pub: lune 3.2018 Repan. R.Iongs deressed a PrgchaSing DM- !awayo ar to yle�ars TCN 2020045 Deadline for sat edition i ThC rammenfs or request for puhil<m�Clinngg must eonuln All !Mal and equipment don, 1800 27th SVeet Vero hed "Sol Moot furri all all work per. each. FlMda 32960. Ab bids INDIAN RIVER COUNTY lbrwon, tri Notico Ixartrg a the fdlowlM ln7or.atlor, TM meetingg formsed lite in actor- wliti M opened P. tic , and daree veld be reed aloV0 at 2:W PAI. AA7)I bids 0y Jennifer Hyde o1 a public Deadline for Sun edition I considera petitlOn lot tM oa) party ame. address d tale- plans, wed- Rc-H." and contract doe- received at. I.. IN.. oniM Purchasing Manager 2PM. Fri clozlrg. abandonment, and pMre numbot the pPll- u;on. pe tAlnlnq thereto. day SpecifiM above, will cot pub: lure 1. 2018 [Ion f tM portion of Its Deadline for Man edition I _tI SW IiimmlJ tot 39th is n nd address. tix Department Permit Nu.- Copies of YIe d0euments are he a¢epted or eorddered. llable et: Remand• TCN 7028691 2:30PM, Fri Court SW, used LotI5, Block A Lot 3, Block B bar, and IM county In which IM }adllty is loutad: ur<om or Dbyv ntactlrrrggp tM INDIAN RNER COYJT• PurcMzirp DM m PROJECT N0.1RC•171S REOUr FOR STATEMENTS OF and rerth of (oe,dikeawbk[t ro oI Mo Waldo's Way Suhdid- (b) A statement of how and 1772) 276-1116 purehailrg ire- INDIAN RIVER COUNTY QUALIFICATIONS en,rme odor to lwlNayd Ian. per Indian Piver Coun- ty When notice of thedraft per- COvaom. All other wmmuni- BID N0. IOIa016 RFpR20M013 Plat BOo,1at Pagge ll. A Other Deadlnn: blk heath which par- mit was received; A description f tions concemhg MIs bid shall be directed to IRB Pu• PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The Co^Nadny Geolechnlul SeMces far Indian Riva Mestones 2PM Tae s In Interest and dtlxeM oc) o- Mopes Mceommentcr ehaslrg DIN:con at pureM:• oraiect corsdsts of .paving Cepaty (IRC•YI!) LSM- 3PM W shall have an opporwnity to warship Svc:. 12PM Tlx M heard, vAll!Tills held by Me 11 poses forth drsit permit: fWl Non of the Ing®Ircgov tom. nd r ngOuHnB the Park. inq los ayt e'M rrorihenri Car - In TFr jodCA Z1I.,, AD bidders go lobrnit a- nor of SR -60 a- Urd �t d. t� �u Bargain Boz TPM Florida In Ue toulrntyyr Commis) pCrmlt proposed 4U., mm. of original Prons ( 8111/o pi me b'nslgmrg anal pavem ty �G omen ssioSo Tari Vduntoerz 2PM Fr sloe ChambUs of the County Adminlstratlon Bufldirg,louf- mentor, ane (eJ U desired, a raquost that PrOvlded witMn tM spMig- marklnps, IandscaDing, and tlora. Please note flat tM removal al Cxhlbrg manila!- it r uesbrg Statements of Quail cations (Sops) Irom Go onlire lo, TCPalm.com to ed at lent 27M Street Vero pub!¢ me Ping be Ached: q tl nnalre must ke filled Ing wells. quaiged rms for conUnuing eruice-�s ere ss�WheFelocal meets classifieds ] Adun Care/Servlces tontractors/Bulldem J �1ome Maint./Repair ootng_ J CNA LI W'S CLEANING (A NOW NOME REPAIRS! D&R RESCREENING IOSE ROCHA ROOF LEAKS A REPAIRS 25.Yra expw/Me elderlq. umdmt.sl-�gpgemevmkY.su t SERVICES SamedmnWy! reMew«ks: vaWMrooma IbdaPa00 Rescret syn0ow Pt. LAWN WI18reVa COmtruetlOn Nwu411n72)]31 1:1 pts •So- l0on�rnlydit deaml. ,�[bnnsn tit°Imfisn]uan: taecns, Kkko stmtrqamrasynd D.Ir. vSERVICfE y DF�imlmiA= Es4LVS Same Dov Service. Work GUaranteM. EXCELLENT C Irq!alwwcklIyv Mce. (I/Nn0d155 guard ryyi ONysweode��Your sour MIM> �ods/anakerslmtshed: VfsaNt/DIs4AMX LIe/Ins W 07215]2-1,]9 Tri iii-Piv/7r2.7271S1t SLC CaD(773)a234sfil TO Drovxt arSolwlux. Ixmemaker/ panbmhk sery IQanUD/iiaubrg at. -warn ]67-]M6()dsy`) DRYWALL REPAIR al/InvOsti ate Svc q THGMPSGNS u. m. sl. wPe 06nnu-2sea _ 1 DANIECS HAULING ./me kA m pD�arn removal SmoaM telling K�w[k down kvMt. ROD0FlNGDfiIISiON O 5 I G O YOUR LAVED ONE? wvl AO Tr,sh Brusn ]tank. 1l JOHNSON Remedtl,R� aaal Carye mm Lie 772 -MI -MS ms LI(:O MCDRY651a PSL91Y DIVOrce St95•Immigtatlon Ipp.27p5 Pro vides expert servio,A WartantYs on your repal[S. Cap Tap tool[ Private Care. An 1Y Gdrege/SLed Uc,awt.7 days,week Reom AdEltl�snko NEED FIXING? �.iassage/ReDexolOgy 77236 1a -IA Cegnryry lkaCCCII]lYIAIcIICGC151d9N We have CNAf/NNAsend! tyy skilled. nonerta de�enda0fe oft MC (777)812-2501 Contiete hlksa Driveways tk 772-672-13531ns Mks It Car eller-30y D• Gown. ubP ts.IntenarMm a IL Ila 31h Afrardabl rates. LIM. 712-YAA000. IOek Repair pair RenoVdUon Remodel, Amiene alrs.CRClllt/68 n2�81-2971 AIA MASSAGE BY MSA toW1 ten Malwe 110 WDI'k 'fir Cond/Heating CLOCKS BY Hs Rppatrcore, Roo �ddipam m spe P'"kcCanlscu.m. utlilw`pinIS nvan.ram BENNISKILEYTILE" VIIkeeO Dr. ?J2.9�9-2630 Kitchens,Iborin0•painlirg, AI ERILSHOME REDAIR ARtVDeSohome TTI Oanrol nyour ole1115 Pot st vets On>iisasm Boors. lneowa, wooe Rpairs-Srtin5AIR-SOURCE'1�''T ftitr, drylli. oveiEatimaka rmates IS mates [All Cneck deckllroomdoorsem enclosure re•screem. Tree tst. Lk/Im. gCGC1509155 AAA MOVING pease:! ' yourArc s�.w zperW seas ;]_ eJsolsLMc ARONS DISCOUNT HOME pool New Consiruetl0q1ne .. (772) tfA•1116 sl_ _ No lob too Small! First SPERD711ESERV/CF '�t COYPIITER SERVICE 000015735 UC/Ins__; CSeNILef floorspecial,575/br �D in Indian Pepalr SDecialist: ShO.ver Pan YOW Servlee MI[rpatt•rarr, 20yr Iorai era (7/7)175.7867 ethic Providers ® vv/1-hr min. River Co. 772.321.3680 RemkcemenL'Dust heetlle rt ovnk LDosaa Ro[kimD SEEKING INVENTORY uownuNrlq: costume k..elry. dos. gdaadlWr. XALLI-� COMPUTER PROBLEMS FOR LESS ELECTRICIAN FOR HIRE fervke work Treubh SlwoDrp, 08"1 SMALVENGINE qRm PAIR 772•Ia0-8076 rgaDlah mowers. Made alnting Scrvl s TIIe.-LINnf(711)SaY1a1SIP sled) natv„rt. InxiiO-A11 Cell Brkn at f]I]p01-0011 b1ix ..9r mmpum predem res. Nowa ON Workaeaertypn nl atpalra: Cdl cousin yank spar ming. DartaAre N Re^eratOrs.aresaue_wasrs, A.A.W. PAINTING ee 5ervlces ku Abq will da Morino ate few'nm. 777.771-Ia05 Lkd suugnM Paper bp, k,UEw Preswre IIns6. AFFORDABLE TREE t/Floor Covering ame MalntJRepair rrti2ation _ .sn U yaa, exp: m county I Ix1.777a Sedco d tot doaH HINTOMSCARPET ixe[e/MasonryWa BLUE WATERS Trimming. Stump Grind�ng, Removal: (Imps CLEANING ]Roam;flD4 tat now TDeaprWtdmnlny ikbls ALL CONCRETE DrivewnysMatlos/ ABLE➢ENOVATION,� AODfUONi a REMODEIMG' xlkMn.brtn. Winurp rendn0. reRIGA7roN SPH^Mars. Gocks. PUmpsa Tl]neLps DON TIDEY REPAINTS Duality auaraMxd FREE Estimates ??2 -37o -4s67 rest Mc 7n-562.72(12 IRC >� Brid7Javers/eledt Odom PSL rpentry.dr,kp<. Code nl,Doml_LklMs,!77 AA RESCREENING hrry 7/73377707. IP rlp/LaaOServi Lk SPOI831 7185-2205 NCYIPD QUALIFY PAINTING LAGETREE TRIMMING'WIT REMOVAL&INSTALLATION d.c Ecame e,rJERRY MOMS ERRYMOM96 RIPP STUCCU LOW tPricos Guaunteed 3.90 ASF F36 Yrs Exp ALLYOUR BY KENNC72-163-3916 ]S lin area unLtrde,Freecstlmak. - 772-571-6353 IR eemmercklmer w oa,Iavwark..e rkare ucemeea msuree LANDSCAPING NEEDS years Nolobt n leanin Services 9 1][nnf]m (lip 661-0]92 Cee BID 7776/6.2809 uonMlIyy ane weeYXryv Wlca CdIRon R7AN1-n]Y WE DO IT ALL J. KINGS SERVICES, INC. Trlmmlng &Removal.0uckel, l� _ x B. S. B. pap 772-1169n sPo » GraDple trucks. Firewood OR CLEAN SERVICES Lk.16DD]sa NusaaMa Wte ao Corerete, Dr(veways, N ImDroveme ls/Pepalrs/ �Nelmenan 772-.,.014S or musedmllp, vAndmua.n ha Ug ]]1361-)1978 BPate Repairs. Carpantry. /R del LIc/InsgMCN55891 GARDENER oofinq� LkAns 772JT3-8076 IR/sl max. rnnfr«ESL set., v.4 New O, Old Lle/Ins Call 77T -672x353 C'B �aH°s-(7T2)216'uui ,IU^•^•are, «ey,.F _ Iniu. rnvNcivi1`u Roofingq Cont2actgr PHIWP'S TREE S A I HOME CLEANING SRVC NCRETE Pntk S, Side AiTAIjlltl.11ULX stet Endosarcs, veAcrem, GARDENIA LAWN SERVICE yfdMm] Uafit0ln arc. uRMe.wrMAka geaaask SERVICE DIP GencrSJCootraneg/Haunoo/ We also do Window; Pressure, GrodaCerpet Uean. Lic/Im wD 1rNeways Lic 07999 Ins. ayclnrkconuet,com Repan. R.Iongs Free Est mates! Ic &Im. Palm WmMrrg !awayo ar to yle�ars Dema111ion: Free Est 772.766-4174 (772)631.6157 IR Aemlevm Pooh 772-IFa-0280 _Trl.Counties 5L/IR �C7.216-7553 �az�iae"sin rl"nR uliriin IleJlnsnnl 116�K7a Mem /013 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA MEMORANDUM TO: Jason E. Brown; County Administrator THROUGH: Stan Boling, AICP Community Development Director THROUGH: Sasan Rohani, AICP Chief, Long -Range Planning FROM: Bill Schutt, AICP Senior Economic Development Planner, Long Range Planning DATE: June 12, 2018 SUBJECT: FIRST PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER APPLYING FOR A COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT AND REQUEST FOR AUTHORIZATION TO PROCEED WITH CONSULTANT SELECTION PROCESS (LEGISLATIVE) It is requested that the following information be given formal consideration by the Board of County Commissioners at its regular meeting of June 19, 2018. INTRODUCTION The next Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) application cycle closes on August 13, 2018. In order to submit a competitive grant application, however, the county must initiate the application process at this time. That involves undertaking several actions, including choosing a CDBG application category, holding two public hearings, and holding a Fair Housing Workshop. BACKGROUND The Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) program application process provides an opportunity for eligible cities and counties to compete for funds to improve local housing, streets, utilities, and public facilities. Those funds are available in several categories: housing rehabilitation, neighborhood revitalization, and commercial revitalization. Since 1995, Indian River County has applied for 9 regular CDBGs totaling $6,750,000, and has been awarded 5 of them totaling $3,750,000. A list of the County's past CDBG applications by year with project descriptions, requested funding amounts, and awarded funding amounts is attached. As shown in Attachment #1, past county CDBG funded projects have included sewer, road paving, drainage, a fire station, and affordable housing rehabilitation projects. Those activities have been completed in the communities of Gifford and Wabasso. 166 For the regular small cities CDBG program the maximum amount that the County can apply for in either the housing rehabilitation, neighborhood revitalization, or commercial revitalization categories is $750,000. The maximum amount that the County can apply for in the economic development category is $1,500,000. DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS CDBG Program Under the CDBG program, there are four grant categories from which Indian River County may apply for funds. Those categories are: commercial revitalization, housing rehabilitation, neighborhood revitalization, and economic development. Attachment #2 contains project option summary sheets for each of those CDBG activity categories. Those sheets also list potential points that could be awarded for each activity. Based on existing CDBG program rules, Indian River County may choose to apply for a grant in the commercial revitalization category, the housing rehabilitation category, or the neighborhood revitalization category. If awarded a grant in one of those three categories, the county may not apply for another grant in any of those three categories until the awarded grant is closed. As shown in Attachment 1, the County's most recent CDBG award was for Phase II of the Wabasso Sewer project. That grant was applied for in 2014 and awarded in 2015, but was cancelled by the County in 2017 after project bids came in approximately $1 million over budget. That project is now being pursued with other funding sources. With no current active CDBG's the County may now apply for a new CDBG. Economic Development Category A fourth CDBG category, the economic development grant category, is independent of the other three categories. In the same fiscal year that Indian River County applies for a grant in one of the first three categories, the county may also choose to apply for funds in the economic development category. Even if Indian River County has an open commercial revitalization, housing rehabilitation, or neighborhood revitalization grant, an economic development CDBG application may still be submitted to the Florida Department of Economic Opportunity (DEO) for consideration. However, to apply for a ED CDBG there should be a committed private business partner that will "guarantee" creation of new jobs. Currently, there is no private business partner requesting this funding. Staff continues to offer assistance if and when an opportunity for an ED CDBG application arises. In the past, the County has worked with two separate developers of potential projects/businesses to apply for ED CDBG funds to construct infrastructure to their proposed projectsibusinesses. One application was for infrastructure serving an assisted living facility and another application was for a distribution center. In both instances, the projects were not assisted with CDBG funds. While not assisted with CDBG funds, the distribution center was built. The assisted living facility was not built. At this time, no developers have requested that County staff pursue CDBG funds from this category. 167 2 CDBG Application Cycle Neighborhood Revitalization, Housing Rehabilitation, and Commercial Revitalization CDBG applications are subject to an annual application cycle. The next application deadline is August 13, 2018. The Economic Development CDBG application time frame, however, is different. Instead of being limited to annual cycles, Economic Development CDBG applications may be submitted monthly. In most cases, Economic Development CDBG applications are related to private development projects. As previously mentioned, staff will continue to look for ED CDBG opportunities. CDBG Application Process The CDBG application process involves various steps, including: ■ Advertising for and holding a first public hearing to obtain public input on the County's economic and community development needs. ■ Advertising for and holding a second public hearing to apply for a specific CDBG category. ■ Holding a Citizen Advisory Task Force (CATF) Meeting to discuss potential project alternatives for the CDBG application (held on June 8th 2018). ■ Holding a Fair Housing Workshops (workshop was held on June 8th 2018 at the CATF meeting). ■ Advertising for and selecting a consultant to administer the CDBG. At this time, to qualify for the CDBG application process, the Board of County Commissioners is to hold the first public hearing. If, after the first public hearing, the Board of County Commissioners chooses to continue with the application process, a second public hearing will be scheduled in front of the Board of County Commissioners (tentatively scheduled for Tuesday, July 3, 2018). At the second public hearing, staff will request BCC approval to submit a CDBG application in the most appropriate CDBG category. CATF On Friday, June 8, 2018 the Indian River County CDBG CATF met, discussed potential projects/community needs, considered all potential CDBG categories, held a fair housing workshop, and took public comment. To comply with CDBG rules, staff will report the results of that meeting to the BCC after public comments are received at the public hearing. This will allow for separate independent public comment. CDBG Application Community Development Block Grant consultant Guardian Community Resource Management, Inc., (GCRM) who the County has used with previous CDBG applications and projects has offered to assist with assembling a new CDBG application at no cost to the county. GCRM provided that service with past applications. If the BCC selects a CDBG category/activity and directs staff to move forward with a CDBG application, staff will work closely with GCRM to prepare an application and present an overview of that application and recommendation to the BCC at a second public hearing. 168 Grant Administration Services If the County is successful in obtaining a CDBG, the county will need to initiate a competitive process to hire a consultant to manage the program. That consultant may or may not be GCRM. Funding for administration of the grant will come directly from the CDBG. ANALYSIS While there is a whole range of activities that can be pursued with CDBG funds, past county projects/activities have focused on infrastructure, housing, and a fire station, and those projects have been in the Wabasso and Gifford communities. Since the small cities CDBG is a highly competitive program it is important that the County select an activity that will provide the highest points. As shown in Attachment 2, activities in the commercial revitalization category, the housing rehabilitation category, and the neighborhood revitalization category that provide the highest points for scoring purposes include: CDBG Projects by Category with Highest Potential Points Housing Rehabilitation Category Potential Points Acquisition in 100 year floodplain 75 Housing Rehab/Demolition/Replacement 75 Permanent Relocation as a part of Hazard Mitigation 75 Removal of Housing Architectural Barriers 75 Temporary Relocation 75 Note: Remaining projects in this category score between 35 and 70 points Neighborhood Revitalization Category Potential Points New Sewage Treatment Plant 85 New Sewer Lines & Components 85 Sewer Hookups 85 Water Hookups 85 Water Lines, New — Potable 85 New Water Tank/Well/Treatment Plant 85 Note: Remaining projects in this category score between 25 and 70 points Commercial Revitalization Category Potential Points Commercial Building Rehabilitation 75 Parking Facilities 75 Sidewalks and Pedestrian Malls 75 Note: Remaining projects in this category score between 30 and 65 points With the County's last CDBG application, the County came very close to not receiving a CDBG award. At that time, Indian River County was the 2"d to last community to receive funding in its 169 4 application category. An additional 30 communities in the category did not receive funding (Attachment 3). The community that received the last CDBG award scored +/- 12 points less than what IRC scored and the next community in line (first to not receive a CDBG award) scored +/-13 points less than IRC. CONCLUSION The County currently has the opportunity to apply for a regular CDBG in the amount of $750,000 in either the Commercial Revitalization, Housing Rehabilitation, or Neighborhood Revitalization category. The County may also apply for an Economic Development CDBG in the amount of up to $1,500,000 outside the "normal" CDBG application window if a willing business wishes to participate and commit to creating new jobs. Past CDBG grant application scoring for the regular CDBG categories have placed the County as one of the last communities to receive a grant award. Because of this, grant category projects that have the highest potential points will give the County the greatest potential of receiving a CDBG award. If after taking public comment the County desires to proceed with a CDBG application, the BCC must provide staff with direction on what CDBG category to pursue. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners: 1. Open the first public hearing and obtain public input regarding the county's economic and community development needs; 2. Consider the CATF's recommendation after public comments are received at the public hearing; 3. Provide direction to staff regarding pursuing a CDBG category funding; and 4. Authorize the Community Development Director to issue an RFP to hire a consultant to administer the CDBG if the grant is awarded. 5. Announce the intention to hold a 2nd public hearing, currently scheduled for July Yd 2018, to review a proposed CDBG application with proposed activities, dollar amounts, and estimated percentage benefit to low and moderate income persons. ATTACHMENTS 1.) Indian River County CDBG Applications 1995 — 2017 2.) Potential projects/activity options for each CDBG application category 3.) FFY 2014 CDBG Awards — Florida DEO FACommunity Development\CDBG\2017-18 CDBG\BCC Items\BCC Memo - 1st Public Hearing - June 19, 2018 Version 2.doc 170 t— N 2 Attachment 1 S � o � � o 0 o) 3 � o w �� ee Q C) �'� o o p , v V O "+s O O O O O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O CG 0 0 C C o C C o io � �&s Gol� r�s 60S &) &I GOq Oi C.0 Cn w bA Cn O H • (n Cd ��0 Cz yb CO � ' `� o o� - C cn Cd tko .Q 3Cd ��3 3�0�, -d �; u v r, �ccg�0 o���U _ 0 O s. s. w � co) � � �o � En Cd o Cd b.� 1=. «S 0 ons a a o o Ct o sb 0 `� °w�'� Nva �.� � N � 3 o 3'0�zz Q �.O.0U o °r.Ai�v� � A4 P4 rn4N cd 0 0 N N N N a a > > O C� C b o0 b 00 > O b °o > O o O On O On A ami A o c2 cz O O �cd O 0A E O 23 Cd 3� O .� � O .Li" .,..� CCS Ca 00 o u z w zz �tn c, � oo a o� a, C, C, o a o 0 0 0 -- N M � I W-) "D I � 00 1 CT 2 Attachment 1 O w W r-1 60 N N E L O 7 LL L LLL ON U m a E i O AdA W M V 172 r - O O M N U M n 00 Ln - C QJ ++ cJ O m .Q `J > 2 N O N U Q > 2 ..OO Q ~ Q z N T 0 O 4.' W In +' Q O`' � � ! ^ v O E Ei Y Y d cu D U v,O Y Em o O :3UO m 7 Ln to U cu Y cu D O C * Ln Ln Ln O Ln V1 Ln o O to O o In o o p m m 4J on C7 O N M V Ln M I, N m I- N N 1\ 1\ lD I- r+ O 2 O ; C LU C7 � N v E CL O > 3 r d O QLn Y O s M v O S V- L C GJ N 7 Y CD O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O V ^ la Y CL Y C C >• O s Q V f+ C O v D_ v O m �, OO -- L O > > o_(Du * v u iE m iF L m CoC U m U v La LU ��V')-v4'����4j)-vn V). V). vIj- 4.1� V')- tn O + w O -p = coo oA U +O ti`) N V) N O N > c O L U 3 Y C i fac N 4+ N C N = m co 'E LL aJ O cJ m O m m U aJ E �- 'D U' (D m m + Qt L L Q m co 0 z ami � m CL v +, m U U Q 00 cr \ t * N oA > = N O O 6 U Y O� � OO + Q L m .�m V Q 0O m c y Y m O i O N E .O .O m W O C, O- O- O O C N O t m UU m m S 41 ':3 E Ln N "C Y C O C O u L 0 C O L1N D_ + + >N > '- O 40 j O O >' m O O O Q E =5"a '6 +J ++ C C +J U to N C N C N m N 2 L 2 x E Q of M m W y O •L O C m E m E CJ i aJ Q >� 4+ L a; e -I .X M u a m (D o w O w m o v a 3 E }, o m. Q Q u U O 2 x o_ w D_ o CC cn cn Fes- T a s o 0 0 o� r o o���� o - .-1 a 172 r - O O M N U M n 00 O AD W U O Ln N E L (Lj LL L a). U- I� U) R O 0 2r V c m C LL (9 m U N io O � � W L1 4� O X ., 0 Ln iz+ U Q W _N m C ,x, O O O O O O Ln O Ln O Ln Ln Ln O Ln O Ln Ln O Ln O '0 t.D lD n M W In W In M M M M W n W L\ W N n Ln U Y N. O 'p F- '1' U U C7 CC) U .O cl u O O N o U (D-0 CO 0LL U i in t/1 V } t. /1 tn Vn to V). t4 t4 t4 V ? ( AA. tn. V/ -tn V/ 4^t V). Vn >. + Lu W Q tio4 mS —_ __ —_ __ __ __ —_ __ — _ Q" N Q a) _ _ _ _ _ m 0 LY C m Z L _N L Z L ..O L Z L � _N � � � .Q .sa � L � M °' ~ F- F- F- F- F- F- F- F- F- F- F- F -F - Q C Q W a) L O C() E n m CL zn � * v L N N cto r ' M '> j dA m u n E n v m m Q- a) d 3 > m n CU -0 m O Y a _ m -a O Y O C' m Y a) z v � Q E v > +, c 3 p L c E O a) I I z p N a) U Q g ' O Ln 010 in E a) L o.. Y U E a) —: H C � C +, H n dA C ++ -L'3 \ L += a) m C 06 U c p a) a) N o= c — pp t +� w w a w L2 E E U O E -+ N p m L Y m ..Q m 3 p " m a) U Q L a) L F E Y J n a) Q Ln p a) > a) > Q n a) �- C Y V bp +_• L N T C C C O a) C Ln �' a) OD m " N a) Y O +, O Q O Q ,4 @ o o cica Lo 0 0 m V - m 3 3 J m E E h T i m "8 C Y m Lp > i O a) N a) =p ?j V 3 a 2 L a v 'a o m N 3 H L N -p v U° U O E p c n E 3 m 3 3 a) 3 a) 3 a) a) v U m O m a) a) a) a) w a) a) a a) O Y Y Q LL- iL Li = = d a oC CC cr V) F- z Ln z Ln N N N N Q LL --j Lu Q U — — -, --, -, — Y Y _4 M M M M 00 O M M M M M M M M M M 0 0 01010 � O 0 0 0 14 0 0 01010 0 0 0 0 N o t.o w -4 60 N N E 2� O j LL L N LL _N m O Q .a C m N M i LL m 0 C) O M N U M n io O (D v w LL- Y p x > Ln 0 E Q E X G W Ln �pc_ O c Ln Ln O^ Ln O^ Ln Ln Ln LnLn 4� O -0 O 00 w W Ln N N tif6 Ln o m L O CL cn s O O O FO U l7 m U v (D O m > 0 O U U a 2 — 4- (D C7 Q ❑ Co U u 1O — a� s N l7 41 OA � m c O CA uL V1 4 N GO c ++ C. h - W Q � O E N w bn t CA O L N — — — _ Y U ar to LL - m co 0 L m c -0O m -Q O N oY0 c E tJ) •t/) th th fm Q Eb f0 f6 f4 N O 3 Q w U � (D O Co fit.. U v iii v c 3 O L LL v� OOV E V) M ` C N LO v f6 O N E U c _ O > U c � t c _ I O O > w � � c CL v O c+� Q E O Q Z y c a + Ln + co > E O p Q N N N Q E Gl Y c Y M41 N O V U Ln O v v1 Z Y o E °' v m LL a, °c° > > a > •h < I LJ � ai (u to N tw Ln •> V1 N Y _ v L N N 'L w •L c 'L � C L in C Z Q v C ro 41 c > Q. c O y W v N -O Q U Y tw c •C C W 7 w i --I O O W c W C O Y C (O GJ L v m O a Q c c 0 (.7 E I11 (.7 m = L J L J L L f0 U Li --C L Q in W W Q < Q V) � � N � �+ i N Y c U m U LL - t L CD m a Q O C O F- m Lri 61 C) O M N U M n 0 N m CL) LL 175 N N N E 4+ L m 5 J bD 3 O V CL �+ 3 c E 3 O C m U 4+ c G •� U � � vi U H O V _ LA L U O •> O a) C aJ > Ln++ N a) t C L c L CL S � 0 m O C N H0 3 L L 3 v U p "- L, = EE c H yj v O m Y N a) N c •L c LL a) a L N C c) t c U cto C V p a) N a �O 3 a 3 c A C U O c i +by C of a) a) L a) c m p Y t a) z +.• O U N r '� L T N >, a., u a) O 4- a) Q ate+ O 'E •� > m Q O �- C� p v O V 3 N L U -0 L V T L p N a) O 4 Q m *CU u+,Gi 4� m C U () *' h ? p +, N t a) > E m O a) p L 3 O = 61 i, U Q C T O ?� O @ L O in O �^ QA 1 4' C °'a � X ++ N a) m a) a CU 3 O aEi O E a>i ami ;� E +J O w C O E O 6 .� C a) N CU aEj X p m � O E c O C a) "� O U= a) W a) 2 c T E O_ � u m O p N 3 3 v m C U� -a k v 1 to L v � c vi O O V N N O C �'+ U L a) by N C Q v cLa -a (U v cn a) m m '� v 3 v� m Q o a) tn = a u bA E 3 Q- E C .0 cu 3 O m 3 3� a) Y o v cu 0 OU OU 3 , m 3 a) in () OU in a) "O O a) u Q -0 C u c O Y O . O op O s Y O a) 'L _V a) '> U C 4- O m u E O > O E L m p — L .� L > L C a) v� a) •� a) L O a1 i > a) in 3 •� f+ �_ O U a) in a) C a) w Q N E 'O 3 3 Q. -6 'L m L a, a) Y Q O L L "O +, m 3 4, p m 3 v ca 3 Q n 3 c p «� a>i m v 3 c Q- 3 v Q t z c c c C c z ci Ln V 3 z d z� o�C O a bA ^ ^ C i to a) c m EL > a ? 3 a D v> Y_ L m m W ,n rn m ii a) a) :E m 4r c a) '> E > +�a1 3 L 3 C m O N it O a) m i-+ N U 0 N � V d Q E "'� 4+ a-+ E N 10 O = C N t a) ++ _ Gi O m m O p m L E O ai Q a) a) a) O_ z +, t (�6 N= Y N O O Y yj Y �b v a "a ) O Q cm p �p O -aC J S p C SO JaC) JaC) 2 n o m Y N O O bA m L a) L a) L a) O +1 a) 4. a) L � L L mr L �_ Ln v a) +% LL LL O m = O = m d v d a) a) a) a) a) a) > > LL 0= N N N In 175 N N c 0 (0 E 0 c i 4] C W v t 0 0. Q 7 H Y U N Y c 0 CL N E w 176 0J H Ln -0 aj N 7 o Z E � C X CC� � c � O 4J p Ln v Q) O Z Q 4J L oo 41 w LL.- i0 p Q o C7 w f6 c 0 * Ln Ln Ln O � Lr) O o O O Ln O O 0 C7 0_ r- W W v t.0 r- M t.0 U')w r- w w O O U i 00 m U O p ;° c p U u 0 E Vf N F - o a + o c a` u v l7 M_ CO > u U > U t/? t/! t/� t/� tn- tn• tn• tn• to t/) to tn• t4 to tn- cQ W t Y In c Y CL c v c m coN Q pC 4J 4J 4J 4) N (J 0) O 0J 0J = Q Q Z Z Z Q Z :B :3 .n O Q w Z Fes- Z F� 1� Fes- I Z ~ ~ H Fes- Fes- !� a U m m 41 -0 Tp _0 O U c * 0J 3 U O t Q o O h to ~ c LL Y CO d C 4J '� : -0 0 0 c m 0 m E c n L �T � u p m dJ d O fC <0 to Z Y Y Y Q T ucA o p a v F- `-' E «, v 41 c Q m > ?) O ++ p i 00 4J > 0J 4J c Y c 0 Y c c6 co * Q u c c p ca Q 7 O C T pOp +�+ O. LL h0 O O �O COLL Y �p E li v f0 E m d c OA >, 2 Ln c c Y mu v > o ` w ` °J u u E m o w v o o E� 3 a3i "a M Q 0 u U a i p o m CL O c�0 a aJ w 0J � 4J 0 cc n. V) in v) T > rU O OT, -,),) LL 00 MpO -4 O OOY OQ v t 0 0. Q 7 H Y U N Y c 0 CL N E w 176 o tD LO r -I 60 N N E O j LL N LL 0 a) u N � N � L C fYa i C O m m fy6 p OO C O m O C E c LnLU r I fa Cit O Q t Op d -J c L N _ m 0O N L L O L M Ln o O fl m a) Ln Ln p m a) Ln H tD N O _ ❑ a) U_ v m _U 4 1 c �' E o N N c Q ❑ v ❑ ❑o El a) u x E V) O 3 CL) L 4� m c Cl E El LO M m C U u L C a) L'' x HIle U L CL c G O N L O O 4 c 0CL f0 U 41 U a) 41 Lnn Lr) N (L)J > +�+ c o CL 4) a) c a) ai - O O 0 m 3 o M Ln m w co t txo a1 O � 0 O r•' o () cYa c 4� � Q y. O !1 m m O Ln O w 00 Ln m c Q O L a m v in m v m E o J J_- Qm a) U m U N c += a) N N � N U Q t- u❑❑ L �❑ m N a, Co c -tea � c c toto c m O C Y 0) L c L QJW C a) +L' WV) 'c_ Ln = E Ln v NU N V)LL m m a, LL a) U U Q a) a) CLO - to v L o fLC LL C C �O '� () H Q O 0) •L CU .> 'GO OF u O_ '� of p > m '0) c c c E Nfl- W W LU E Q f`a u D c 0 'a io � U m Co Q m a) L0 00 (D O u O E �' m y E-0 a) N of 4J L U U L M +� m m a a Q .- +- ami 'o > cr a) 0 i ui t.6 r-� w 0 u N � N � L C ++ � N C O m m fy6 p OO C O m C E c LnLU r I fa Cit O Q t Op N L -J c L N _ m 0O N Ol C11 Oi L O L M Ln o fl m a) Ln Ln p a) a) Ln H tD N O _ v a) U_ v m _U 4 1 c �' E o N N c Q v ❑ ❑o El a) u x V) O CL) L 4� m c Cl 4- 0 O to m LO M m C U u L C a) L'' HIle L CL c G O N L O O 4 c 0CL U 41 U a) 41 Lnn Lr) N (L)J > +�+ c o CL 4) a) c a) ai - O O �i m 3 o M Ln m w co t txo a1 O � 0 O r•' o O ♦' \ cYa c 4� � Q y. O !1 m m O Ln O w m O m c Q O L a m v in m v m E O U 3 J J_- Qm a) U m U N c += U N N � N U Q t- u❑❑ �❑ 177 m (A. i •0 ii O AV W •.-% O L a Mo 4) V A� W E a _0 W ^ W •E r_ U W N W N H 1 / V N N 'O 1 0 O F- U N 4' O Z CO ED C-6 -0 LL m L i1 i N V- V? V? V? V� V)- V} V VV? V). V) V1 V? V} V) V? V? VF V? V} V} a� p > O CL) V) o�S U OA V 'N Lu vU o j V)- V�- V� V� 4.4 in. Vn V} V)- V)- V� V). Vr Vn V" d J O z (O W W C N 4• dA N Co � m •� aJ � V1. V} t/? t/i t/? V? V} V? V} V} VT L? VT t/? V? V? VT V} V} m ti d � 11 � J a UI N m� o� �4.n4j)-tn��-J)- V). VI. V)- V)- V)- V). V} V)-V�V}V). U w CLO aJ L:D D I w w w N a w a) C_ C- _ O C Q _N m Q m m m m -0 0 _N _0 _N -0 _N 7 Q _N :6 :B Q _ -a Q LU z F- Z F- F- F- F- X F- F- F- F- F- Z H H Q F- Z N a1 NM V Y U Y m m -O b.0 p a) 00m N j •N CU "C � C rN.. C: O — A-+ co .L N Ln a) O 0a1 a) V � d d +, .2 to p .V m O L a) Q i N C a) C+ cu - m L 'O V c 3 v0 O _ E E N N p O +� m m C '^ + w p in >, @ L °' Q m LJ i N �� C N O O O +, O � '^ Q 0 C V m F- _. F- N aJ to m w N �' - p U 4- +, +, w m Ll w aJ J O'Lp N _ i C cu y N E fL6 `-' Zn O +-' aJ .� _ O L O — O Q .Q m C. +, m m UA Z O C O p O U C O C C ° fl m O c cu c + O +m+ N ai I v T d +' M +r m L.L. J m Li J p C m LL +, mm — m CSA i i Q U 'L N w I C7 O L N L N L aJ L N L a '6 +� W m u J m u O �,d (� O O > m O +j +j O O Y O a O m N +, O 2 Ln Ln Li- Li N a to oC m m w T Q U Co Co CO CO CO Co Co 0 U CO Uo Q m 0 U O n t\ n n n n cH w lD 00 Q ILI 1 / V N U a, 'o a C7 m 0 z. U O w 3 GJ cc N C 3 LL f0 r co Ln ea .Q M + N + i-1 v L O V N i m E 3 N L O Cu0 QJ U �..LM -Ir O vi r to m y O Q. w v pp x L }/ m O a = m to u m CL m E O to _ M O v H C m CL m Q a) t C O C E 3 O V 0 W () s C ai M a) C O a) L O V N rn t r.+ L aJ H _ m FL - 179 U LLL r-1 O O m N U m r, 0 LL C O O U ca LV V} V} V? V? V? V? t/i V} V? V? V} V�- O O m h s C O 00 D Vn Vn -,n to to < in V). Vr V? 4A. V)- V')- }Ua to - C a) a) c — •OA C W ❑ U V} tJ} V? V? VT w V). V? V} VT V} in V? C � a) X� a) a) O U H cn m O V) cr- Q Q Q — ,n Z Z Z a) v W O to L � L /a Va) m a) C a) U O Q) W 'O T Q aJ N U C C 3 Q a N O L O u. E _U O LL LU "O O W _0 a) V) N mQ � U a) LL a) m O C m a) M V) - C V m N W tea) L c a) W '= 0 L CM t6 m O a) L in C a) a) i a) a) LL > Z �� O a) .... O a L/) = A •pa _C •L a) Q C a) '_L •L C E a) c a) Q C a) 1 i C a > (6 U Ln 7 H a) N W >, C W a) C 3 O a) + a) � s O Ln CL OI o (> Zw n C C p CM Q W Li a) W w C70 M U U .'6 ++ f0 a) m _ U O L +lB+ D�1 in en O �+a) a s 0 Z O H H L 00 OC a Q W F- co Ln ea .Q M + N + i-1 v L O V N i m E 3 N L O Cu0 QJ U �..LM -Ir O vi r to m y O Q. w v pp x L }/ m O a = m to u m CL m E O to _ M O v H C m CL m Q a) t C O C E 3 O V 0 W () s C ai M a) C O a) L O V N rn t r.+ L aJ H _ m FL - 179 U LLL r-1 O O m N U m r, FFY 2014 CDBG Awards - Florida DEO 180 N 00 n O M Lo O n N N M O 00 ri N N O1 zt 01 N Ln O r, O ri � LD N M M M ri M W O 00 Ln M ri ri N � O l0 01 01 01 u O n Ln O 00 l0 LO It r -I 00 00 LD Lfl N O 0) Ln M N O 41 0) LD to 01 n Ln Ln TI, M M M M N N N N N r -I O O Ol 01 01 00 00 00 N N r, n n n n n N n n n n n n n N LD LD l0 LO 1.0 LO C Ll. O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O •0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O_ O O O O O O O N O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O i C N O_ n O O O O O N O Tr O N r" O O O O O O cr O O O O L O0 n O O 01 O O 00 O LO O O0 LO O O O O Ol O N O O O O li C LO LO Lf) n O (3)c!' M Ln n O n M 'IT O n 00 Ln O 01 N Ln 01 V Ln N O N O n Ln n O LO .t11 N N Ln Ln n Ln r, O n O L 7 mh kmai O w = L d O Ol O O O O O O O M O O O O N O O M O Ln M r -I O U h OJ E O Ln O O O O O 00 O O O O LO O LO LO O ':*: Ln N O C uU " M O TI, O N O Ln Ln O O O m Ln Ln Ln -;TLn n r -I r O LD Ln M O a o O_ N Ln n Ln ri Ln n Ln l0 Ln 00 cT n Ln r-4 Ln l Ln e-4 Ln 00 Ln 00 � mr0 'IT r, It 01 -It 01 -d' N Ln N Tr N Ln r -IO Ln Ln N n LL Q Q OE QA a C a, C .L LL C a) ri Ol N 00 Ol Ln 00 N 00 Ol ri M DO r -I n N Ol r -I U') t` N 01 n O O l0 Ln lD (h M M cr ri lD 01 N r-1 Ln M 'a' ri r\ OD o0 ri :t LO al y++ u In N z N n Ln M M r -I N 0) N n O N Ln n Ln 01 LD LD 01 01 01 l0 l0 0 N N 3 O N N r -I Ln r -I ri ri r -I 00 ri e -i -I r\ ri r -I r -I N r -I 01 O N Ln r -I r\ r -I 1:31 ri M ri r -I ri ch ri r -I ri 01 O ri Ol ei N ri O r u' rQ O O r\ 00 Ol L/1 L0 n Cf' M 01 ri 00 r -I N N Ln N 01 N N O r\ CL O N Ln l0 N M M O i r -I O 00 ri DO Ln M r r 00 00 O l0 00 Ol al O S U LO n Ln N 00 ri N a> 4 00 O LO Ln N6 Ol ri M N6 ri Ol <D i O - to O1 r- n M n Ln f� r� N n M n Ln n M n N N r -I n M N N N -* r- ri n O n O n m LD 0) LO 01 <D N r, 00 lO 00 lD m O ,Q !Z (n CL D t Q Ln U 4J O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 o O O O O O o O o 0 o O O o O V L O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O t/) t/). V). tA t/? O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o O o (� Q Ln Ln Ln Ln O Ln Ln O Ln Lo Ln O O LD LD Ln Ln O � en � tn• L t/r to to to . to AA V1.vt in L � In to IP).t/> L1. t4t/> L N O r -I O Li N } LL LL N O z O O C O O u Y C v O C u w a% O v �, v W v L O 3 u p {) O v +�''+ O 0 C C •� f6 U `—�° O N fl- ` O 7 T f0 O O �M CL Q c0 3 ° Y ° ra 'X E O `° ra O m 3a c Q m L d OD m a+ N O N m Iz O "6 T f0 (O \ C Q en C7 u i f- 2 C7 2 LL N = J co �° > u J 5 �; O N Ln 01 O n LD -It N 't O N CY 00 01 r -I r -I Ln N n M M O M z r -I r -I N N M r -I O O N ct M ri ri M r -I N O N r -I ri O ri M Li a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z Q Y OO ri N M Ln 1p n 00 01 ri ri ri N ri M ri ri Ln ri lD ri ri 00 ri 01 ri O N ri N N N M N 180 181 00 00 1:31 r-1 O -r` m N Ln LO O l0 00 m m O ct N m N N O d' N 00 N 00 00 r- M N r-1 Ln O V) m 00 rl N 00 M rl 00 u O .--I e --I r, O O r-� ri ri 4 o0 N 6 00 o0 O 01 u) v1 v1 1n 00 n rl rl W W LO Ln Ln Ln ':I' M M O O 01 01 00 l0 W N LO LO LO w LO w W LO w W LO w l0 l0 V1 -:I, ICT -It It C IL V) O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O •O O O O O O O. O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O V) O O O O O O O O U1 O O O O Ln O a-+ f6 C 0) d O 00 O O O O O r` v) O ri O o0 O O O C L- 0p O V) O O O O O ri LO lD m M ri O r` V1 Ln O M O M m O O Ln V1 3 v 0) N O LL O LO (.o Ln r` O r, u) r` O r` O r` 6 Ln 00 LD 00 Ln o0 d O Ln O w r� V) O r` M v O r` v) v O rn O r` 00 v m L 3LU _ m co s m y N Lu 0- cr L O O D 0J O 0 O O O O O O O o0 m 00 (n O O N ri O O O O 00 M U N 0J O O O O O O O w ri ct w O O M N O O O O r` m i uU ra v1 r- N 0) u) W u) 0) v) 01 u) 01 O O o0 --t o0 00 o0 00 4 r, u) M u) O 4 M 6 V ul 00 O N u1 O u1 O O M t0 r - LL Q Q to V' -:T � Ln -7t ct V 'IT Ln � � M M M M M M N Q d 4J C w m 3vw LL - C GJ 00 O -It ri DO r` Q1 r` u) M lD lO r` 00 00 N d' M Ol 't 00- O O zr r- w N ^ 00 r*� Rzt M 'ZI: O og O l0 M N M M M L ++ U N N Z v) u1 r-1.6 m O O N d' r ri M w Ln r, O O Ol O Ol O W.N rC M ri ri ri M ri O ri N ri O r -I V1 r-1 Ol O ri N ri Ln. lO ri .-I ri N r -I r, O ri M ri r, 00 O r -i C ate+ U r0 � •Q O 00 O 'IT 1-1 O rl 0) N 14 00 W W r` M O N -zr O m d' ri M O m ct OC r` W N w w rl M N m 'T O w O M N w e-1 O ri w ri w Q L c6 O O N ri ri r� v) O r-� ri ri 4 o0 N r< 4 o0 6 6 u1 O l0 6 ri u1 01 C7 U N00 'Q lD 00 lO r, w r- lO W l0 00 lO rl LO Ln w Ln LO W lO 'tT lO M lO M LO O w �t lO 0) Rt M lO rl :t W Ol Ln N u1 O r� W w 'ITO lO Ln m 0 v-- L a vii U M y N 0) Z O ++ O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O U Eon N s O LL N LL LL N E m C O v ro vai ?� U Q m O Y O 0: O 3 on m O Y m U O • U m J- J 0_ S S LL M U J N J N (7 D N C7 0- a U L. J m m W Ll m O01 l0 r\ 00 00 O Ln Ln w ri M W -1 r0 l M N Ln 00 rI rl It It r, m w Z O O N M N M M N M O N O -zt N V' 'ct -T M -:T IT M O 11 -:t a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a¢ a a a a z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z a c T Ln w r` 00 m o ri N M v Lr) W r` 00 rn o r 1 N M ct N N N N N N M M M M M M M M M M V l:T 'IT V' -;t 181 182 L Ln 0) rn LD In r, O m O U N � W O cr w 76 n L C LL m r -I r -I 1.0 W N Y O O O O w * O d Ln N O O ON U aT+ � M Ln N n f6 lD M N ri C 6 l0 N 0) N N14 O W a Ln � � M M M k.0 to 00 00 L 40 O w 00 n n n , O u, O r� M n r- tD l0 w Ln I 3 Ow O t0 N 3 d LLI 2 L > O C LL Om O V N d u o v o cC C N M N r -I O LL O Q C10 E O 0.0 O O Q d •0 h O v O O O O 'a O O O O O O O LL C N LO O cn l00 O 000 L � O ++ U N N j Ln 0�0 M 00 O N f0 i ~ U O m > v •Q' y +, � Ln rn � � CL f0 L O) n n •� t0 O O00 ri LO (' U Cn l0 r -I w Ln Ln m E CL = N o E a N O H U -0 CL 4J ++ U O L O C O C O `/} o 0 O m O Q O n O E l0 on 00 M 00 "O L- 00 O O O O O In O n O O Li q:T Ln Ln N OJ fu O LA- 'h O LL O LL O n Ln LO O 0) M Ln Ln Ln LL Ol d' a) O Ln Ln m 0) m t- �0 E p 3 m Z 3 C: 3 N LLI = W u 0 -CL U Q L j Y d _O � � J OM z O r -I O N O 0 U U U Q Of 182 M n N Ln O m m r1 W O cr w -tt n M LD m r -I r -I 1.0 W m N :T w w * In O n ON U Q) M Ln N n M6 lD M N ri 4 6 l0 N M N N14 O W Ln Ln � � M M M 00 R* 00 00 00 00 00 n n n n n n n w l0 w t0 C LL N O O O O O O O O O 0.0 O O O O •0 O O .O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O N O O O O O O O O O O O N f0 C N CL O O O O O Ln O n O O l0 M 00 M 00 "O L- 00 O O O O O In O n O O M q:T Ln Ln Ln OJ fu O LA- 'h O Ln n O Ln n O n Ln LO O 0) M Ln Ln Ln Ln r- Ol d' ri r, O Ln Ln m 0) m t- �0 V, p 3 3 3 N LLI = W a j 0 N O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O -0 Eq o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .Q u O O O O Ln O O O Ln O O O O O O m m w W W w w Ln w LD ri l0 l0 Ln %t Ln 1.0 Ln M tD w Ln LD Ln w Ln m Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln CL a O C L a. — v cu N O L M n N Ln O m -It w O 00 Ln w I:T Ln LO M r -I r -I W M M � R* W N O M Ln r -I C N Z N4 00 O P-: N M l0 lD 06 M6 M6 N p O m r -I 00 ri -* N M Ln O N O r -I O 00 z r -I N r -I r -I r-1 ri r -I r -I r -I rl r -I R r+ U m t Y O M n Ln N O CI) -Zt r -I 00 O n m O n Ln O w m r -I ri ID m m N -:T W 00 LO Ln O d' Ln MO uO N O) Ln 00 N M n O l0 Mui N4 t.6 O O) • _N M 00 N 00 ri 00 TT 00 O 00 Ln n W n Ln n '4* n � n N n M n M CD 00 LD r\ LO N 00 In CL 3 CL O O Q N O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O o 0 co O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 V? In. i/? V). 3 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Q O Ln Ln 0 o o Ln Ln O O Ln Ln to A/? All. to tn• t/> -L4 i/ - t/). .n. t/? -V1 A/). c 3 LL O1 T Z � C 3 3 3 c�0 O 0) Y y c 3 O U 3:3 O O S O C: 3 (7 U U U U Ln U O U - Y Q CL U c O 0) N "O O U .X m N 3 Y N C cu E C t' �O N T UJ "d a 0O N O N m U m O f0 tLa v@• G L L N LL CCO1 G O U U > J LL S d G CO J co (J O LD M 1.0 e-4 n O N m 00 N O) Ln -�T r -I Ln Z O r -I r -I r -I O r -I O O O O ri O O r -I O r-1 2 S 2 2 2 2 2 2 S 2 2 S 2 S 2 2 Q ri N M � Ln l0 r\ 00 Cl) O� r -I -4-I aM-1 rr-I Ln r -I m 182 June 19, 2018 Board of County Commissioners June 19, 2018 1St Public Hearing for FFY 2017 Community Development Block Grant Application Cycle Joint Presentation by Indian River County Community Development & Guardian Community Resource Management, Inc. 4 + - Community Development Block Grants 1. Competitive Application Process through the State — Closes August 13, 2018 2. County may have only one active CDBG in either the housing rehabilitation, neighborhood revitalization, or commercial revitalization categories 3. County may also have an active CDBG in the economic development category; would like to come back to this after a CDBG regular category is selected. 4. County must take and consider public comment at 2 public hearings and at Citizen Advisory Task Force; 2nd public hearing proposed for July loth BCC 5. County staff and CATF recommendations will be presented to the BCC only after BCC takes all public comment at this public hearing. 10.A.3. 1,91-1 June 19, 2018 Past County CDBG Applications and Projects Since 1995 the County has: • Applied for 9 regular CDBGs totaling $6,750,000 — 6 Neighborhood Revitalization — 2 Economic Development — 1 Housing • Been awarded 5 CDBGs totaling $3,750,000 — 4 Neighborhood Revitalization — 1 Housing Projects Have Included • Road Paving and Drainage in Wabasso ($750,000) • Housing Rehabilitation grants/loans —focused on Gifford area ($750,000) • Fire Station in Gifford ($750,000) • Sewer Lines in Wabasso ($750,000); 2nd Phase proceeding without grant Overview of CDBG Program Guardian Community Resource Management Inc. 10.A.3. (f L- 2 June 19, 2018 Community Development Block Grants 1. Federal Funding to the State 2. State Develops Rule and Application 3. Competitive Process 4. Benefit to Low and Moderate Income (LMI) 5. Eligible Applicants: a) Cities of less than 50,000 population b) Counties of less than 200,000 population Community Development Block Grants 1. Very, very competitive (common to take 2-3 tries) 2. Community Wide Need Scores (CWNS) are base scores calculated by FDEO/HUD 3. Income documentation required — census can be used but survey is usually required to achieve score (51% LMI min, 70% LMI is better for score) 10.A.3. i SZ. 3 June 19, 2018 Funding Categories Regular Category ($750,000) 1. Neighborhood Revitalization (infrastructure) ➢ LMI neighborhoods at least 51% LMI; 70%. LMI will maximize score ➢ Minimum 85 LMI households (HH) in the project area served by the CDBG work for max score ➢ Eligible Activities: water, sewer, roads, storm, neighborhood centers, parks, sidewalks ➢ New sewer and water score the highest ➢ Leverage, up to,$50,000 for 25 points ➢ Ready to proceed (plans, specs, permit apps) 100 points PU- 4 10.A.3 . June 19, 2018 . Funding Categories Regular Category ($750,000) 2. Housing Rehabilitation (rehabilitation/repair) ➢ LMI owner occupied repairs: code, safety, hardening ➢ Leverage $50,000 (can be County SHIP) 25 points ➢ Green improvements in Housing Assistance Plan is important to score ➢ 10 owner occupied units must be addressed to maximize score ➢ Very Low Income and Low Income HH must be addressed to maximize points ➢ A CDBG Housing Assistance Plan with priorities such as disabled, veterans, elderly head of HH must be adopted Funding Categories Regular Category ($750,000) 3. Commercial Revitalization (CRA improvements) ➢ Commercial Redevelopment Area required (City does not have one at this time) ➢ LMI city wide at least 51%; sidewalks parking, lighting, building code, facades ➢ Leverage is important to score (can be Tax Increment Financing/TIF) ➢ Ready to proceed is important to score ➢ Optional points for other community development such as architectural standards, market study, vacant commercial properties 10.A.3. I g2' 5 June 19, 2018 Economic Development "J013;'. Economic Development (maximum $1,500,000)' Open until State funds expended — does not compete with regular r.; ➢ Infrastructure needed for business expansion or new business: water, sewer, rail, traffic, roads, gas, fiber ➢ Local government-owned buildings; market rent ➢ Loans to businesses (via eligible local governments) ➢ Job Creation required: grant per job under $35,000 ➢ At least 51% of the jobs created going to persons of LMI households; diploma or equivalent and on job training Economic Development, contN. . ti{VHIRING. ' Economic Development — Sample program e) Public Benefit Standards= cost per job under $35,000 (e.g. —For a $1,500,000 grant: $1,500,000 divided by $34,999 = 42.85 = round up = 43 Jobs Minimum) f) National Objective = Job Creation with at least 51% of the jobs created going to LMI Persons. (e.g. Above 43 Jobs times .51 = 21.85 = round up = 22 LMI Jobs) 10.A.3. $1, 6 June 19, 2018 Process 1. CATF (appointed; at least 5 citizens; 51% LIVII; required to meet once before the 1st Public Hearing) 2. First Public Hearing (review categories) 3. Income Surveys if applicable 4. Application draft 5. Second Public Hearing (resolution to submit; leverage funds of $50,000) 6. Interlocal if needed for other government participation 7. Application finalized and submitted 8. Economic Development can apply until funds expended Indian River County CDBG Program Review Questions Thank You (County Staff Recommendation to Follow) 10.A.3. `FL- 7 June 19, 2018 Recommendation 1. Open the first public hearing and obtain public input regarding the county's economic and community development needs; 2. Consider the CATF's recommendation after public comments are received at the public hearing; 3. Provide direction to staff regarding pursuing a CDBG; and 4. Authorize the Community Development Director to issue an RFP to hire a consultant to administer the CDBG if the grant is awarded. 5. Announce the intention to hold a 2nd public hearing, currently scheduled for July loth 2018, to review a proposed CDBG application with proposed activities, dollar amounts, and estimated percentage benefit to low and moderate income persons. 10.A.3. `�2' 8 June 19, 2018 Extra Slide to be used if BCC Discusses potential projects and CDBG Application points 10.A.3. VO/- 9 CDBG Pgjects by Category with Hi hest Potential Points Housing Rehabilitation Category Potential oints Acquisition in 100 year floodplain 75 Housing Rehab/Demolition/Replacement 75 Permanent Relocation as a part of Hazard Mitigation 75 Removal of Housing Architectural Barriers 75 Temporary Relocation 75 Note: Remaining projects in this category score between 35 and 70 points Neighborhood Revitalization Category o en ial oints New Sewage Treatment Plant 85 New Sewer Lines & Components 85 Sewer Hookups 85 Water Hookups 85 Water Lines, New — Potable 85 New Water Tank/Well/Treatment Plant 85 Note: Remaining projects in this category score between 25 and 70 points Commercial Revitalization Category . o en 'al oints Commercial Building Rehabilitation 75 Parking Facilities 75 Sidewalks and.Pedesti•ian Malls 75 10.A.3. VO/- 9 June 19, 2018 Slides to review with BCC after public comment is received 10.A.3. K- 10 June 19, 2018 Citizen Advisory Task Force June 8, 2018 Meeting Concerns regarding: 1. General condition and availability of affordable housing countywide; 2. Need for more employment opportunities; 3. Ability to finance business expansions; 4. Need for water infrastructure improvements in Gifford; and S. Need for sidewalks to Osceola Magnet School in the Oslo area. After much discussion, the CATF voted unanimously to recommend that the BCC select and pursue a CDBG in the Housing Rehabilitation category Gifford Neighborhood Plan • Action 2.1— By 2019, the County will apply for Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds to rehabilitate 20 or more substandard housing units in the east Gifford area. 10.A.3. 151-11 Treasure Coast Newspapers I TCPALM Indian River Press Journal 1801 U.S. 1, Vero Beach, FL 32960 AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF INDIAN RIVER Before the undersigned authority personally appeared, Natalie Zollar, who on oath says that she Is Classified Inside Sales Manager of the Indian River Press Journal, a daily newspaper published at Vero Beach in Indian River County, Florida: that the attached copy of advertisement was published in the Indian River Press Journal in the following Issues below. Affiant further says that the said Indian River Press Journal is a newspaper published in Vero Beach in said Indian River County, Florida, and that said newspaper has heretofore been continuously published in said Indian River County, Florida, daily and distributed in Indian River County, Florida, for a period of one year next preceding the first publication of the attached copy of advertisement; and affiant further says that she has neither paid or promised any person, firm or corporation any discount, rebate, commission or refund for the purpose of securing this advertisement for publication in the said newspaper. The Indian River Press Journal has been entered as Periodical Matter at the Post Offices in Vero Beach, Indian River County, Florida and has been for a period of one year next preceding the first publication of the attached copy of advertisement. Customer Ad Number Cooyline PO # 463755 - INDIAN RIVER COUNTY PLANNING - 2034260 FIRST PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE Indian R Pub Dates June 10, 2018 Sworn to and subscribed before me this day of, June 12, 2018, by l + who is Natalie Zoll (X) personally known to me or ( ) who has produced as identification. `w' V q `''V tG Karol Kangas Notary Public _ - upr KAROLEKANGAS - . t ; Notary Public - Slate ofFlorida Commission#GG 126041 L py om,';,��" My Comm, Etplreslui29,2021 6ondedllna0ghNdbedNOtaryAsm .. .-Ii Tearsheet FIRST PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE Indian River County is con- sidering applying to the Flor- ida Department of Economic Opportunity (DEO) for a FFY 2017 Small Cities Communi- ty Development Block Grant (CDBG). The County is eligible to apply for up to $750,000 in the Commercial Revitaliza- tion, Neighborhood Revitaliza- tion, and Housing Rehabilita- tion categories and up to $1.5 million in the Economic Devel- opment category. Projects/ activities funded through the CDBG Program must meet one of the following National Objectives: 1. To benefit low and mod- erate income persons; or 2. To aid in the prevention or elimination of slums or blight; or 3. To meet other communi- ty development needs of a particular urgency because existing conditions pose a serious and immediate threat to the health or wel- fare of the community Potential projects/activities include, but may not be limit- ed to acquisition of real prop- erty, construction of public infrastructure such as roads, parks or sewer mains, reha- bilitation of houses and com- mercial buildings and/or ener- gy conservation. Additional information regarding the range of activities that may be undertaken will be provid- ed at the public hearing. The County is seeking public input into CDBG eligible needs in the Unincorporated County. The categories and options shall be presented to the public and Board of County Commission- ers (BCC), and public com- ments shall be heard before the recommendations of staff or consultants. In developing an application for submission to DEO, Indian River County must plan to min- imize displacement of persons as a result of planned CDBG activities. In addition, Indian River County is required to develop a plan to assist dis- placed persons. The public hearing to receive citizen views concerning the community's economic and community development needs will be held in the Coun- ty. Commission Chambers at the Indian River County Administration Building A, located at 1801 27th Street, Vero Beach, Florida on Tues- day, June 19, 2018, at 9:00 a.m., or as soon thereafter as pos- sible. For information con- cerning the public hearing or to submit written comments contact Mr. Bill Schutt, Senior Economic Development Plan- ner at phone: (772) 226-1243 or email: bschutt@ircgov.com. The public hearing is being conducted in a handicapped accessible location. Any non-English speaking person wishing to attend the public hearing or any handicapped person requiring special accommodations to partici- pate in the meeting is asked to advise the County at least five (5) calendar days before the meeting by contacting the County's Americans with Disabilities Act Coordinator at (772) 226-1223. Hearing or speech impaired persons, please contact the County using the Florida Relay Ser- vice, 1(800) 955-8771 (TDD) or 1(800) 955-8770 (Voice). Indian River County Board of County Commissioners By: -s- Peter D. O'Bryan, Chairman Fair Housing/Disability Access Jurisdiction and Equal Oppor- tunity Employer Pub: June 10, 2018 TCN 2034260 �Ibl-0 10Aq _ G OCe Of Public Hearing 0611912018 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY ATTORNEY Dylan Reingold, County Attorney William K. DeBraal, Deputy County Attorney Kate Pingolt Cotner, Assistant County Attorney MEMORANDUM TO: Board of County Commissioners THROUGH: Richard B. Szpyrka, P.E., Public Works Director FROM: William K. DeBraal, Deputy County Attorney DATE: June 12, 2018 SUBJECT: Public Hearing: Amending Indian River Code Creating Chapter 318, Stormwater Discharge The Indian River County Stormwater Division was recently audited by the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (DEP). Overall, the County received favorable comments. One comment received was a suggestion to amend the County's waste water section of the code to include a prohibition against illicit discharges into the storm sewers. On October 3, 2017, staff presented a bare bones ordinance to the Board and the Board directed staff to come back with an ordinance in more final form ready for advertisement. On October 24, 2017, staff presented a more final form of the ordinance and obtained Board approval to advertise the ordinance for a public hearing. Highlights of the proposed ordinance include: • Definitions of Best Management Practices, illicit discharges and stormwater • Prohibitions on illicit discharges and connections • Provisions for suspension of permits and monitoring of discharges • Enforcement, appeal and abatement of discharges In its current form, the ordinance will be enforced by the Public Works Stormwater Division as they have the most working knowledge of stormwater issues. A complaint may arise from several sources including code enforcement, land development inspections, environmental code enforcement or from the public at large. The complaint would be investigated and if the Stormwater Division deems it appropriate and in accordance with Board direction, a citation would be issued to the offending party. The offender could simply pay the amount listed on the violation and the matter would be concluded. If the violator wishes to contest the citation, the matter would be scheduled to be heard by the Code Enforcement Board. The Code Board would then hear the matter and if the violator would be found at fault, the Code Board would assess fines and timetables for resolution of the violation. If an emergency exists, either injunctive relief could be sought or remedial action could be taken by the County with reimbursement the responsibility of the violator. 183 Memo on Public Hearing Creating Chapter 318 June 12, 2018 Page (2 At the Board's direction, staff met to discuss the proposed fine schedule for violations. The attached schedule and adopting resolution, are modeled after the fine schedule approved by the Board for violations of the vacation rental and event at residence ordinance. Staff proposes the following fine matrix for violations of Chapter 318: VIOLATION TYPE SECTION FINE' NOTICE TIMEFRAME 2 Illicit Stormwater Discharge Illegal discharge Illicit connection Reinstate MS4 access w/o prior 318.04 318.05 318.06 up to $500.00 for 1St Per occurrence violation. $2,500 for Per occurrence repeat violations 5.OUO 15_000 Per occurrence Should a person discharge paint or concrete into a storm drain, lake or ditch, the initial violation would be $500.00 with repeat violations at $2,500.00. If a person illegally hooks up to a storm drain to dispose of illicit discharges, the fine would be $5,000.00. Under the new ordinance, the County can issue an order to cease using an existing storm drain connection if it being used to introduce illicit discharges into a Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System (MS4). If the person ignores the order or begins discharging without prior County approval, the fine will be $5,000.00. FUNDING: The only cost of amending the code will be advertising fees for publication of the ordinance in the Indian River Press Journal. Advertising costs are estimated to be less than $200.00 and funds are budgeted and available from Account # 11128138-034910, Transportation Fund/Stormwater/Legal Ads. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends the Board discuss the proposed ordinance, conduct a public hearing on the amendment to the IRC Code to prohibit illicit discharges into storm sewers and adopt the ordinance amendment with any changes deemed necessary. Staff also recommends the Board approve the resolution amending the schedule of penalties and authorize the chairman to execute the resolution on behalf of the Board. Attachments: Ordinance Amendment to Chapter 318 Resolution Amending Schedule of Penalties Copies to: James Ennis, P.E., County Engineer Keith McCully, P.E., Stormwater Engineer Alexis Peralta, Stormwater Education Todd Tardiff, Stormwater Inspector 184 ORDINANCE NO. 2018 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, ESTABLISHING INDIAN RIVER COUNTY CODE CHAPTER 318, ADOPTING REGULATIONS FOR STORMWATER DISCHARGE INTO PUBLIC STORM DRAINAGE SYSTEMS, PROVIDING FOR CODIFICATION; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the conservation, protection and preservation of stormwater is an important aspect of maintaining a healthy environment; and WHEREAS, since the County's storm drainage systems lead to the Indian River Lagoon and other water bodies, it is especially vital to make sure harmful pollutants are not introduced into the lagoon through contaminated storm runoff; and WHEREAS, discharging, draining or dumping any substance, except stormwater, into a storm sewer, storm grate, storm gutter, swale, canal, waterbody or other drainage system could result in damage to aquatic plants, mammals; fish and birds; and WHEREAS, the purpose of this ordinance is to provide for the health, safety, and general welfare of the citizens of Indian River County through the regulation of non- stormwater discharges to the storm drainage system. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA that: SECTION 1. ESTABLISHMENT. CHAPTER 318. ILLICIT STORMWATER DISCHARGE Section 318.01 Title. This chapter shall be known as the illicit stormwater discharge ordinance. Section 318.02 Definitions. When used in this chapter, the following terms shall have the following meanings: Best Management Practices (BMPs): schedules of activities, prohibitions of practices,eq neral good housekeeping practices, pollution prevention and educational practices, maintenance procedures, and other management practices to prevent or reduce the discharge of pollutants directly or indirectly to stormwater, receiving waters, or stormwater conveyance systems. BMPs also include treatment practices, operating procedures, and .practices to control site runoff, spillage or leaks, sludge or water disposal, or drainage from raw materials storage. Coding: Words underscored are additions to text; words in striketh-rc� format are deletions to text. 1 185 ORDINANCE NO. 2018 - Clean Water Act. The federal Water pollution Control Act (33 U.S.C. § 1251 et segs, and any subsequent amendments thereto. Construction Activity: Activities subject to National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Construction Permits. These include construction projects resulting in land disturbance of an acre or more. Such activities include but are not limited to clearing and grubbing, grading, excavating, and demolition. Hazardous Materials. Any material, including any substance, waste, or combination thereof, which because of its quantity, concentration, or physical chemical, or infectious characteristics may cause, or significantly contribute to, a substantial present or potential hazard to human health, safety, property, or the environment when improperly treated, stored, transported, disposed of, or otherwise managed. Illegal Discharqe. Any direct or indirect non-stormwater discharge to the storm drain system, except as exempted in Section 318.04 of this ordinance. Illicit Connections. An illicit connection is defined as either of the following: (a) Any drain or conveyance, whether on the surface or subsurface, which allows an illegal discharge to enter the storm drain system including but not limited to any conveyances which allow any non-stormwater discharge including sewage, process wastewater, and wash water to enter the storm drain system and any connections to the storm drain system from indoor drains and sinks, regardless of whether said drain or connection had been previously allowed, permitted, or approved by an authorized enforcement agency or, (b) Any drain or conveyance connected from a commercial or industrial land use to the storm drain system which has not been documented in plans, maps, or equivalent records and approved by an authorized enforcement agency. Industrial Activity. Activities subject to NPDES Industrial Permits as defined in 40 GFR, Section 122.26 (b)(14). National Pollutant Discharge- Elimination S sty em (NPDES) Storm Water Discharge Permit means a permit issued by the Federal Environmental Protection Agency (or by a State under authority delegated pursuant to 33 USC 1342(b)) that authorizes the discharge of pollutants to Waters of the United States, whether the permit is applicable on an individual, group, or general area - wide basis. Non-Stormwater Discharge. Any discharge to the storm drain system that is not composed entirely of stormwater. Pollutant. Anything which causes or contributes to pollution. Pollutants may include, but are not limited to: paints, varnishes, and solvents; oil and other automotive fluids; detergents; non -hazardous liquid and solid wastes and yard Coding; Words underscored are additions to text; words in stFikethreugh format are deletions to text: �, 186 ORDINANCE NO. 2018 - wastes; refuse, rubbish, garbage, litter, or other discarded or abandoned ob;ei cts ordinances, and accumulations, so that same may cause or contribute to pollution: floatables; pesticides, herbicides, and fertilizers: hazardous substances and wastes; gray water, sewage, fecal coliform and pathogens; dissolved and particulate metals; animal wastes; wastes and residues that result from constructing a building or structure; soil, silt and sediments; and noxious or offensive matter of an, kind. Pollution. The presence in the outdoor atmosphere or waters of the state of any substances, contaminants, noise, or manmade or human -induced impairment of air or waters or alteration of the chemical, physical biological, or radiological integrity of air or water in quantities or at levels which are or may be potentially harmful or iniurious to human health or welfare, animal or plant life, or property or which unreasonably interfere with the enjoyment of life or property, including outdoor recreation unless authorized by applicable law. Storni Drainage System. Publicly -owned facilities by which stormwater is collected and/or conveyed, including but not limited to any roads with drainage systems, municipal streets, gutters, curbs, inlets, piped storm drains, pumping facilities retention and detention basins natural and human -made or altered drainage channels, reservoirs and other drainage structures. Stormwater. Any surface flow, runoff, and drainage consisting entirely of water from any form of natural precipitation, and resultingfrom om such precipitation. Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan: A document which describes the Best Management Practices and activities to be implemented by a person or business to identify sources of pollution or contamination at a site and the actions to eliminate or reduce pollutant discharges to stormwater, stormwater conveyance systems, and/or receiving waters to the maximum extent practicable. Wastewater. Any water or other liquid, other than uncontaminated stormwater, discharged from a facility. 318.03, Applicability, This ordinance shall apply to all water entering the storm drain system generated on any developed and undeveloped lands unless explicitly exempted by an authorized enforcement agency. 318.04, Prohibition of Illegal Discharges. (a) No person shall discharge or cause to be discharged into the municipal storm drainage system or watercourses any materials, including but not limited to pollutants or waters containing -any pollutants that cause or contribute to a violation of applicable water quality standards, other than stormwater. The commencement, conduct or continuance of any illegal discharge to the storm drainage system is prohibited except as described as follows: 1. The following discharges are exempt from discharge prohibitions established by this ordinance: water line flushing or other potable water sources, landscape irrigation or lawn watering diverted stream flows, rising Coding: Words underscored are additions to text; words in s4ket4r-Gugh format are deletions to text. 187 ORDINANCE NO. 2018 - ground water,_ ground water infiltration to storm drains, uncontaminated pumped ground water, foundation or footing drains (not including active groundwater dewatering systems), crawl space pumps, air conditioning condensation, springs, non-commercial washing of vehicles, natural riparian habitat or wetland flows, swimming pools (if dechlorinated - typically less than one PPM chlorines firefighting_ activities, and any other water source not containing Pollutants. 2. Discharges specified in writing by the authorized enforcement agency as being necessary to protect public health and safety. 3. Dye testing is an allowable discharge, but requires a verbal notification to the authorized enforcement agency prior to the time of the test. 4. The prohibition shall not apply to any non-stormwater discharge permitted under an NPDES permit, waiver, or waste discharge order issued to the discharger and administered under the authority of the Federal Environmental Protection Agency, provided that the discharger is in full compliance with all requirements of the permit, waiver, or order and other applicable laws and regulations, and provided that written approval has been granted for any discharge to the storm drainage system. 318.05 Prohibition of Illicit Connections. (a) The construction, use, maintenance or continued existence of illicit connections to the storm drainage system is prohibited. the past, regardless of whether the connection was f practices applicable or prevailing at the time of connection. (c) A person is considered to be in violation of this ordinance if the person connects a line conveying sewage to the Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System (MS4), or allows such a connection to continue. 318.06. Suspension due to Illicit Discharges in Emergency Situations. The Public Works Director or his assign, may, without prior notice, suspend MS4 discharge access to a person when such suspension is necessary to stop an actual or threatened discharge which presents or may present imminent and substantial danger to the environment, or to the health or welfare of persons, or to the MS4 or Waters of the United States. If the violator fails to comply with a suspension order issued in an emergency, the authorized enforcement agency may take such steps as deemed necessary to prevent or minimize damage to the MS4 or Waters of the United States, or to minimize danger to persons. a. Suspension due to the Detection of Illicit Discharge. Any person discharging to the MS4 in violation of this ordinance may have their MS4 access terminated if such termination would abate or reduce an illegal discharge. The authorized enforcement agency will notify a violator of the proposed termination of its MS4 access. The violator may petition the Public Works Director for a reconsideration and hearing. Coding: Words underscored are additions to text; words int�g format are deletions to text. 188 ORDINANCE NO. 2018- b. A person commits an offense if the person reinstates MS4 access to premises terminated pursuant to this Section, without the prior approval of the Public Works Director. 318.07 Industrial or Construction Activity Discharges. Any person subject to an industrial activity, including construction activity, NPDES stormwater discharge permit shall comply with all provisions of such permit. Proof of compliance with said permit may be required in. a form acceptable to the Public Works Director prior to the allowing of discharges to the MS4. 318.08 Monitoring of Discharges a. Applicability. This section applies to all facilities that have stormwater discharges associated with industrial activity, including construction activity. Access to Facilities. The Stormwater Division shall be permitted to enter and inspect facilities subject to regulation under this ordinance upon reasonable notice in order to determine compliance with this ordinance. If a discharger has security measures in force which require proper identification and clearance before entry into its premises, the discharger shall make the necessary arrangements to allow access to representatives of the authorized enforcement agency. c. Facility operators shall allow the Stormwater Division ready access to all parts of the premises for the purposes of inspection, sampling, examination and copying of records that must be kept under the conditions of an NPDES permit to discharge stormwater, and the performance of any additional duties as defined by state and federal law. d. The Stormwater Division shall have the right to set up on any permitted facility such devices as are necessary in the. opinion of the authorized enforcement agency to conduct monitoring and/or sampling of the facility's stormwater discharge. e. The Stormwater Division has the right to require the discharger to install monitoring equipment as necessary. The facility's sampling and monitoring equipment shall be maintained at all times in a safe and proper operating condition by the discharger at its own expense. All devices used to measure stormwater flow and quality shall be calibrated to ensure their accuracy. f. Any temporary or permanent obstruction to safe and easy access to the facility to be inspected and/or sampled shall be promptly removed by the operator at the written or oral request of the Stormwater Division and shall not be replaced. The costs of clearing such access shall be borne by the operator. g. Unreasonable delays in allowing the Stormwater Division access to a permitted facility is a violation of a stormwater discharge permit and of this ordinance. A person authorized enforcement agency reasonable access to the permitted facility for the purpose of conducting any activity authorized or required by this ordinance. Coding: Words underscored are additions to text; words in strikethr-eu94 forma_ t are deletions to text. 189 ORDINANCE NO. 2018 - If the Stormwater Division has been refused access to any part of the premises from which stormwater is discharged, and he/she is able to demonstrate probable cause to believe that there may be a violation of this ordinance, or that there is a need to inspect and/or sample as part of a routine inspection and sampling program designed to verify compliance with this ordinance or an order rder issued hereunder, or to protect the overall public health, safety, and welfare of the community, then the authorized enforcement agency may seek issuance of a search warrant from any court of competent jurisdiction. 318.09 Use of Best Management Practices Stormwater Division will adopt requirements identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) for any activity, operation, or facility which may cause or contribute to pollution or contamination of stormwater, the storm drainage system, or Waters of the United States. The owner or operator of a commercial or industrial establishment shall provide, at their own expense, reasonable protection from accidental discharge of prohibited materials or other wastes into the storm drainage system or watercourses through the use of these structural and non-structural BMPs. Further, any person responsible for a property or premise, which is, or may be, the source of an illegal discharge, may be required to implement, at said person's expense, additional structural and non-structural BMPs to prevent the further discharge of pollutants to the Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System. Compliance with all terms and conditions of:a valid NPDES permit authorizingthe he discharge of stormwater associated with industrial activity, to the extent practicable, shall be deemed compliant with the provisions of this section. These BMPs shall be part of a stormwater pollution prevention plan (SWPPP) as necessary for compliance with requirements of the NPDES permit. 318.10 Watercourse Protection. Every person owning property through which a watercourse passes, or such person's lessee, shall keep and maintain that part of the watercourse within the property free of trash, debris, excessive vegetation, and other obstacles that would pollute, contaminate, or significantly retard the flow of water through the watercourse. In addition, the owner or lessee shall maintain existing privately owned structures within or adjacent to a watercourse so that such structures will not become a hazard to the use. function or physical integrity of the watercourse. 318.11 Notification of Spills. Notwithstanding other requirements of law, as soon as any person responsible for a facility or operation, or responsible for emergency response for a facility or operation has information of any known or suspected release of materials which are resulting or may result in illegal discharges or pollutants discharging into stormwater, the storm drainage system, or Water of the United States said person shall take all necessary steps to ensure the discovery, containment, and cleanup of such release. In the event of such a release of hazardous materials said person shall immediately notify emergency response agencies of the occurrence via emergency dispatch services. In the event of a release of non -hazardous materials, said person shall notify the Public Works Director in person or by phone or facsimile no later than the next business day. Notifications in person or by phone shall be Coding: Words underscored. are additions to text; words in StFikethfGu # format are deletions to text. r, 190 ORDINANCE NO. 2018 - confirmed by written notice addressed and mailed to the Public Works Director within three business days of the notice. If the discharge of prohibited materials emanates from a commercial or industrial establishment, the owner or operator of such establishment shall also retain an on-site written record of the discharge and the actions taken to prevent its recurrence. Such records shall be retained for at least three years. 318.12 Enforcement. a. Notice of Violation. bition or compliance by written notice of violation to the responsible person. Such notice may require without limitation: 1. The performance of monitoring, analyses, and reporting; 2. The elimination of illicit connections or illegal discharges; 3. That violating discharges, practices, or operations shall cease and desist; 4. The abatement or remediation of stormwater pollution or contamination hazards and the restoration of any affected property 5. Payment of a fine to cover administrative and remediation costs: 6. The implementation of source control or treatment BMPs: and 7. The time, date and location of the alleged violation. If abatement of a violation and/or restoration of affected property is required, the notice shall set forth a deadline within which such remediation or restoration must be completed. Said notice shall further advise that should the violator fail to remediate or restore within the established deadline, the work will be done by a designatedoq vernmental agency or a contractor and the expense thereof shall be charged to the violator. 318.13 Contesting Notice of Violation Any person receiving a Notice of Violation may contest the violation by providing notice in writing to the Public Works Director. The notice to contest the violation must be received within twenty days from the date of the Notice of Violation. Hearing on the violation shall take place at the next meeting of the Code Enforcement Board of Indian River County. The Code Enforcement Board may assess fines of up to $500 for a first violation and up to $2,500 for subsequent violations of subsection 318.04 Illegal Discharges, and up to $5,000 for violations of subsection 318.05, Illicit Connections. The amount of any fines or penalties assessed by the Code Enforcement Board for violations of this section may be established by a resolution of the Board of County Commissioners, Either party may appeal an adverse decision of the Code Enforcement Board pursuant to Florida Statutes Chapter 162. 318.14 Violations Deemed to be a Public Nuisance In addition to the enforcement processes and penalties provided, if the Code Enforcement Board deems the violation condition caused or permitted to exist is repeat violation or is an eminent threat to public health safety, and welfare and the Code Enforcement Board so declares it to be a nuisance, the violation may be summarily abated or restored at the violator's expense, and/or a civil action to abate, enjoin, or otherwise compel the cessation of such nuisance may be taken. Coding: Words underscored are additions to text; words in str*ethfouo format are deletions to text. 7 191 ORDINANCE NO. 2018- 318.15 Enforcement Measures After Notice of Violation If the violation has not been corrected pursuant to the requirements set forth in the Notice of Violation, or, in the event of a contested Notice of Violation, within thirty, days after the decision of the Code Board, then representatives of the Stormwater Division shall be authorized to enter upon the subject private property and take any and all measures necessary to abate the violation and/or restore the property. It shall be unlawful for any person, owner, anent or person in possession of anv premises to refuse to allow the Countv above. 318.16 Cost of Abatement of the Violation Within thirty days after abatement of the violation, the owner of the property will be notified of the cost of abatement, including administrative costs. The property owner may file a written protest objecting to the amount of the costs within fifteen (15) days from receipt of the notice. If the amount due is not paid within thirty days, the chanes constitute a lien on the property for the amount of the costs. 318.17 injunctive Relief It shall be unlawful for any person to violate any provision or fail to comply with any of the requirements of this Ordinance. If a person has violated or continues to violate the provisions of this ordinance, the authorized enforcement agency may petition for a preliminary or permanent iniunction restraining the person from activities which would create further violations or compelling the person to perform abatement or remediation of the violation. 318.18 Remedies Not Exclusive The remedies listed in this ordinance are not exclusive of any other remedies available under any applicable. federal, state or local law and it is within the discretion of the authorized enforcement agency to seek cumulative remedies. SECTION 2. CODIFICATION. It is the intention of the Board of County Commissioners that the provisions of this ordinance shall become and be made a part of the Code of Indian River County and the word `ordinance" may be changed to "section," "article," or other appropriate word or phrase and the sections of this ordinance may be renumbered or relettered to accomplish such intention; providing, however, that Sections 2, 3 and 4 shall not be codified. SECTION 3. SEVERABILITY. If any section, or any sentence, paragraph, phrase, or word of this ordinance is for any reason held to be unconstitutional, inoperative, or void, such holding shall not affect the remaining portions of this ordinance, and it shall be construed to have been. the legislative intent to pass the ordinance without such unconstitutional, invalid or inoperative part. Coding: Words underscored are additions to text; Words in stFikethrough format are deletions to text. 8 192 ORDINANCE NO. 2018 - SECTION 4. EFFECTIVE DATE. This ordinance shall take effect upon filing with the Florida Secretary of State. This ordinance was advertised in the Indian River Press Journal on the 9th day of June, 2018, for a public hearing on the 19th day of June, 2018, at which time it was moved for adoption by Commissioner and seconded by Commissioner and adopted by the following vote: Chairman Peter D. O'Bryan Vice Chairman Bob Solari Commissioner Susan Adams Commissioner Joseph E. Flescher Commissioner Tim Zorc The Chairman thereupon declared the ordinance duly passed and adopted this 19th day of June, 2018. Attest: Jeffrey R. Smith, Clerk of Court and Comptroller By: Deputy Clerk Approved as to form and legal sufficiency William K. DeBraal Deputy County Attorney INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, by its Board of County Commissioners Peter D. O'Bryan, Chairman Effective Date: This ordinance was filed with the Department. of State of the State of Florida, and becomes effective on the day of 2018. Coding: Words underscored are additions to text; words in strikethFawgI4 format are deletions to text. 9 193 RESOLUTION NO. 2018- A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AMENDING THE SCHEDULE OF PENALTIES AND NOTIFICATION TIME FRAMES FOR CODE VIOLATIONS SET FORTH IN RESOLUTION NO. 92-59, AS AMENDED BY RESOLUTION NOS. 95-62, 2013-089 AND 2016-056, TO INCLUDE ENFORCEMENT OF ILLICIT STORMWATER DISCHARGE REGULATIONS. WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 103.07 of the Code of Indian River County, the Board of County Commissioners has the authority to adopt, by resolution, a schedule of violations and penalties to be assessed by code enforcement officers, including standard notification time periods for specific types of violations, with said time periods not to exceed thirty (30) days; and WHEREAS, the Board previously adopted Resolution No. 92-59, which designated code enforcement officers. and a schedule of penalties and notification time frames; and WHEREAS, in 1995, the Board adopted Resolution No. 95-62, amending Resolution No. 92-59 to include penalties and notification time frames for solid waste disposal violations of County Code Chapter 204; and WHEREAS, in 2013, the Board adopted Resolution 2013-089, amending Resolution No. 92-59 to include penalties and notification time frames for fertilizer and landscape maintenance violations of County Code Chapter 316; and WHEREAS, in 2016, the Board adopted Resolution 2016-056, amending Resolution No. 92-59 to include penalties and notification time frames for vacation rentals and commercial event at residence; violations of County Code Chapter 911; and WHEREAS, the Board desires to further amend the schedule of penalties and notification time frames to incorporate enforcement of new illicit stormwater discharges regulations, as referred to and set forth herein. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, THAT: 1. Recitals. The above recitals are true and correct and are incorporated herein. 2. Amendment to Schedule of Penalties and Notification Time Frames. The Board hereby amends the Schedule of Penalties and Notification Time Frames set forth in Attachment A to Resolution 92-59, as amended by Resolution Nos. 95-62, 2013-089 and 2016- 056, as follows (added language is double underlined): Fun,-» 0nm10 dr— n cif &rd,a V:1nmnum P, cr ATION FIXE SC1fr1)J?E11J ; 2018-_ d— 1 194 RESOLUTION NO. 2018 - See ATTA CHMENTA, Amendment to Schedule of Penalties and. Notification. Time Frames 3. Schedule of Penalties and Notification Time Frames Not Amended to Remain in Full Force and Effect. In all other respects, the Schedule of Penalties and Notification Time Frames shall remain in full force and effect. The foregoing resolution was moved for adoption by Commissioner and the motion was seconded by Commissioner and, upon being put to a vote, the vote was, as follows: Chairman Peter D. O'Bryan Vice Chairman Bob Solari Commissioner Susan Adams Commissioner Joseph E. Flescher Commissioner Tim Zorc. The Chairman thereupon declared the resolution duly passed and adopted this 19"' day of June, 2018.. ATTEST: Jeffrey R. Smith, Clerk of Court and Comptroller Deputy Clerk BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA WE 10 Peter D. O'Bryan, Chairman RL4imnrevVJiRlOrdlnonce Anienrhuenrsltinnmcn er 111kil Di-hmgeA&-Jurinn fnr CTWION FINESMED,REPRES2018-_ docs 2 195 RESOLUTION NO. 2018 - AMENDMENT TO RESOLUTION NOS. 92-59,95-62,2013-089 and 2016-056 Attachment A CITATION ORDINANCE SCHEDULE OF PENALTIES & NOTIFICATION TIME FRAMES VIOLATION TYPE SECTION FINE' NOTICE TIME FRAME2 Contracting Unlicensed contracting 400.01(1) $500 N/A Contractor advertisement violation 400.01(5) $500 N/A Licensed contractor or owner -builder hiring unlicensed contractor(s) 400.01(6) $500 N/A Uninsured contractor violation 400.05 $500 N/A Fraudulent license 400.07(1) $500 N/A Deliberate disregard of county contracting ordinance 400.07(6) $500 N/A Other contracting violations specified in F.S. Chapter 489 489.127(F.S.) 489.132(F.S.) $500 N/A General Debris burning w/o permit 925 $450 N/A Violation of issued burn permit 925 $300 24 hrs. Boat/trailer storage 911.15(7) $50 48 hrs. Commercial vehicle storage 911.15(3) $50 48 hrs. Occupancy w/o C.O. 914/401 $450 24 hrs. 'Each day the violation exists represents a separate violation. 'The notification time frame established herein may be waived if the violation presents a serious threat to the public health, safety, or welfare, or if the violation is irreparable or irreversible. 'The fine shall be $100 for those violations by a person who has previously been found through the Code Enforcement Board or any other quasi-judicial or judicial process to have violated, or who has admitted violating, the same section, notwithstanding that the violations occur at different locations. 196 FAAttorney\BiIAOrdinance AmendmentAStorinwater Illicit Discharges\Citation Fee Schedule for illicit discharge.rtf RESOLUTION NO. 2018 - AMENDMENT TO RESOLUTION NOS. 92-59,95-62,2013-089 and 2016-056 Attachment A CITATION ORDINANCE SCHEDULE OF PENALTIES & NOTIFICATION TIME FRAMES VIOLATION TYPE SECTION FINE' NOTICE TIME FRAME2 Building Code violation (w/o 401.06 $450 24 hrs. required permit) Industrial waste dumping 973 $450 24 hrs. Junk vehicle 911.15(4) $50 10 days Noise/vibration violation 974 $50 24 hrs. Solid waste disposal violations: - Deposit refuse in unlawful 204.02 $50 N/A manner - Littering 204.03 $50 N/A - Salvaging 204.05 $50 N/A - Improper use of transfer 204.06 $50 N/A station R.O.W. violations: - Vehicle 312.06(2) $50 48 hrs. - Sign 312.06(1)(g) $100 24 hrs. - Illegal Business 312.06(1)(m) $250 24 hrs. - Obstruction 312.06(1)(c) $100 48 hrs. - Illegal (non -waste) fluid 312.06(1)(e) $100 48 hrs. . discharge - Work without proper traffic 312.06(1)(k) $250 N/A controls - Parade without permit 312.06(1)(n) $250 N/A - Other R.O.W. violations 312.06 $100 48 hrs. Illegal sign: - Banner 956.12 $100 48 hrs. - Snipe sign - A -frame sign - Other portable sign 'Each day the violation exists represents a separate violation. 'The notification time frame established herein may be waived if the violation presents a serious threat to the public health, safety, or welfare, or if the violation is irreparable or irreversible. 'The fine shall be $100 for those violations by a person who has previously been found through the Code Enforcement Board or any other quasi-judicial or judicial process to have violated, or who has admitted violating, the same section, notwithstanding that the violations occur at different locations. 197 FAAttomey\Bill\Ordinance Amendments\StormwaterIllicit Discharges\Citation Fee Schedule for illicit discharge.rtf 2 RESOLUTION NO. 2018 - AMENDMENT TO RESOLUTION NOS. 92-59, 95-62, 2013-089 and 2016-056 Attachment A CITATION ORDINANCE SCHEDULE OF PENALTIES & NOTIFICATION TIME FRAMES VIOLATION TYPE SECTION FINE' NOTICE TIME FRAME Stormwater violation 930 $100 48 hrs. Vehicle parking & storage 911.15(4) $50 48 hrs. Sea turtle lighting violation 932.09 $50 24 hrs. Fertilizer and Landscape Management violations: Timing of fert. app. vio. 316.3 $503 N/A Fertilizer -free zone vio. 316.4 $503 N/A Fertilizer content/app. vio. 316.6, 316.7 $503 N/A Application practices vio. 316.8 $503 24 hrs. Grass clippings/debris vio. 316.9 $503 24 hrs. Comm. license/cert. vio. 316.13 $500 N/A Illicit Stormwater Discharge up to$500.00 for 1St Per occurrence violation. $2.500 for Illegal discharge 318.04 reeit violations Illicit connection 318.05 Per occurrence Per occurrence Reinstate MS4 access w/o prior 318.06 5 000 a nroval Vacation Rental Vehicle parking violation 911.15(4) $50 per vehicle per 24 hrs.* occurrence per day for first violation; $100 per vehicle per occurrence per day for repeat 'violations Failure to obtain or maintain a valid 911.15(9) $100 per day per 30 business days* county vacation rental license vacation rental unit Violation of license condition 911.15(9) $100 per day 24 hrs.* Contact information update violation 911.15(9) $100 per violation 24 hrs.* Noise Violation 911.15(9) and $100 per day for 24 hrs.* 974 first violation; $300 per day for repeat violations Commercial Event 'Each day the violation exists represents a separate violation. 'The notification time frame established herein may be waived if the violation presents a serious threat to the public health, safety, or welfare, or if the violation is irreparable or irreversible. 'The fine shall be $100 for those violations by a person who has previously been found through the Code Enforcement Board or any other quasi-judicial or judicial process to have violated, or who has admitted violating, the same section, notwithstanding that the violations occur at different locations. 198 I' Attomey\Bill\Ordinance Amendments\Stormwater Illicit Discharges\Citation Fee Schedule for illicit discharge.rtf 3 RESOLUTION NO. 2018 - Commercial event at residence 911.15(8) $1,000 per event for 24 hrs.?' Note: due to Florida law, fines first violation; exceeding $5.00 are assessed through the $5,000 per event for Indian River County Code Enforcement repeat violations Board and not by means of a citation issued by a code enforcement officer. *First and only warning for any given vacation rental unit. or single-family residence 'Each day ,the violation exists represents a separate violation. '-The notification time frame established herein may be waived if the violation presents a serious threat to the public health, safety, or welfare, or if the violation is irreparable or irreversible. 'The fine shall be $100 for those violations by a person who has previously been found through the Code. Enforcement. Board or any other quasi-judicial or judicial process to have violated, or who has admitted violating, the same section, notwithstanding that the violations occur at different locations. 199 FAAttomey\Bill\6rdinance Amendments\Stormwater Illicit Discharges\Citation Fee Schedule for illicit dischargextf 4 icy - A- +. Treasure Coast Newspapers I TCPALm Indian River Press Journal 1801 U.S. 1, Vero Beach, FL 32960 AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF INDIAN RIVER Before the undersigned authority personally appeared, Natalie Zoilar, who on oath says that she Is Classified Inside Sales Manager of the Indian River Press Journal, a daily newspaper published at Vero Beach in Indian River County, Florida: that the attached copy of advertisement was published In the Indian River Press Journal in the following Issues below. Affiant further says that the said Indian River Press Journal is a newspaper published in Vero Beach in said Indian River County, Florida, and that said newspaper has heretofore been continuously published in said Indian River County, Florida, daily and distributed in Indian River County, Florida, for a period of one year next preceding the first publication of the attached copy of advertisement; and affiant further says that she has neither paid or promised any person, firm or corporation any discount, rebate, commission or refund for the purpose of securing this advertisement for publication in the said newspaper. The Indian River Press Journal has been entered as Periodical Matter at the Post Offices in Vero Beach, Indian River County, Florida and has been for a period of one year next preceding the first publication of the attached copy of advertisement. Customer Ad Number Coovline PO # 461741- INDIAN RIVER COUNTY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE 2034372 NOTICE OF INTENT- PUBLIC HEARING NO Pub Dates June 9, 2018 Sworn to and subscribed before me this day of, lune 12, 2018, by who is Natalie Zolliv (X) personally known to me or ( ) who has produced as identification. Karol Kangas Notary Public 11°x — � KAROLEKANGAS ti= Notmy Public- State of Florida Commission M 126041 }S / ,°!;".,^" My Comm, Expires Jul 29,2021 fgxaedlhroighNaaoMINOWyAm 11°x — � Tearsheet NOTICE OF INTENT - PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Board of County Commis- sioners of Indian River County, Florida, will conduct a Public Hearing to consider adoption of a proposed ordinance enti- tled: AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COM- MISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORI- DA, ESTABLISHING INDI- AN RIVER COUNTY CODE CHAPTER 318, ADOPTING REGULATIONS FOR STORM - WATER DISCHARGE INTO PUBLIC STORM DRAINAGE SYSTEMS; PROVIDING FOR CODIFICATION; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFEC- TIVE DATE. The Public Hearing will be held on Tuesday, June 19, 2018 at 9:05 a.m., or as soon there- after as the matter may be heard, in the County Commis- sion Chambers located on the first floor of Building A of the County Administrative Com- plex, 1801 27th Street, Vero Beach, Florida 32960, at which time interested parties may be heard with respect to the proposed ordinance. The proposed ordinance may be inspected by the public during regular business hours (8:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday) at the Office of the Clerk to the Board of County Commissioners locat- ed on the 2nd floor of Building A of the County Administrative Complex, 1801 27th Street, Vero Beach, Florida. Anyone who may wish to appeal any decision which may be made at this meeting will need to ensure that a ver- batim record of the proceed- ings is made, which includes testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is based. Anyone who needs a special accommodation for this meet- ing must contact the County's Americans With Disabilities Act (ADA) Coordinator at 772- 226-1223 at least 48 hours in advance of the meeting. INDIAN RIVER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PETER D. O'BRYAN, CHAIRMAN Pub: June 9, 2018 TCN 2034372 �qI "Z INDIAN RIVER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSION REQUEST TO BE SCHEDULED FOR PUBLIC DISCUSSION Any organization or individual wishing to address the Board of County Commission shall complete this form and submit it to the Indian .River County Administrator's Office. PUBLIC DISCUSSION INFORMATION Indian River County Code Section 102.04(10)(b): as a general rule, public discussion items should be limited to matters on which the commission may take action Indian River County Code Section 102.07(2): limit remarks to three minutes unless additional time is granted by the commission NAME OF INDIVIDUAL OR ORGANIZATION: ADDRESS: `L{ S wy! CCSB- ` PHONE: SUBJECT MATTER FOR DISCUSSION: "'A' 70-� 6a IS A DIGITALIELECTRONIC PRESENTATION PLANNED? YES a NO IS THIS AN APPEAL OF A DECISION YES F-1 NO WHAT RESOLUTION ARE YOU ( �0 REQUESTING OF THE COMMISSION? ARE PUBLIC FUNDS OR ACTIVITIES REQUIRED? F YES NO WHAT FUNDS OR ACTIVITIES ARE REQUIRED TO MEET THIS REQUEST? Transmitted to Administrator Via: Interactive Web Form &Mail Hand Delivered Phone COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR: Jason E. Brown MEETING DATE: FACountyAdmin\ExccAs%XAGEND"ublic Discuuion Item Fcm.doc 200 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSION /d6-:2, REQUEST TO BE SCHEDULED FOR PUBLIC DISCUSSION Any organization or individual wishing to address the Board of County Commission shall complete this form and submit it to the Indian River County Administrator's Office. PUBLIC DISCUSSION INFORMATION Indian River County Code Section 102.04(10)(b): as a general rule, public discussion items should be limited to matters on which the commission may take action Indian River County Code Section 102.07(2): limit remarks to three minutes unless additional time is granted by the commission NAME OF INDIVIDUAL OR ORGANIZATION: Pickleball University (Ken Roberts) ADDRESS: 2140 14th Ave Vero Beach, F132960 PHONE: SUBJECT MATTER FOR DISCUSSION: IS A DIGITAL/ELECTRONIC PRESENTATION PLANNED? F-1 YES Fx7 NO IS THIS AN APPEAL OF A DECISION F-1 YES IX I NO WHAT RESOLUTION ARE YOU Dedicated Pickleball Facilities in Indian River Countr REQUESTING OF THE COMMISSION? y ARE PUBLIC FUNDS OR ACTIVITIES REQUIRED? FxYES F-1 NO WHAT FUNDS OR ACTIVITIES ARE Numerous dedicated pickleball courts to ease the demand in the REQUIRED TO MEET THIS REQUEST? county Transmitted to Administrator Via: Interactive Web Form E -Mail Hand Delivered Phone COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR: MEETING DATE: Jason E. Brown FACounty Admin\EsecAset\AGENDA\Public Discussion Items Form.doc 201 ll� gtTER c Office of'the INDIAN RIVER COUNTY ,oRjVA ADMINISTRATOR Jason E. Brown, County Administrator Michael C. Zito, Assistant County Administrator MEMORANDUM TO: Members of the Board of County Commissioners FROM: Jason E. Brown County Administrator DATE: June 11, 2018 SUBJECT: Resolution Granting Area of Operation Authority for the Escambia County Housing Finance Authority to Issue Multifamily Housing Revenue Bonds to Finance a Project in Indian River County BACKGROUND On July 11, 2017, the Indian River County Board of County Commissioners (the Board") granted continuing Area of Operation authority to the Escambia County Housing Finance Authority (the "Escambia Authority") for purposes of allowing the Escambia Authority to operate its TBA single-family mortgage loan program and its mortgage credit certificate program within Indian River County (the "County"). Recently, the Escambia Authority received an application requesting the Escambia Authority to consider issuance of its multi- family housing revenue bonds to finance or refinance the acquisition, upgrading, reconditioning, rehabilitating, improving, and beautifying of a 168 -unit Taylor Pointe Apartments (formerly known as the Lindsey Apartments Phases I & II), located at 4885 38th Circle, Vero Beach, Florida 32967 (the "Apartments") (collectively, the "Improvement Project"). Because the Apartments are located within the territorial limits of the County, Chapter 159.603, Florida Statutes, requires that the Board grant "Area of Operation" authority to the Escambia Authority to provide the legal authority to the Escambia Authority to undertake the, financing of the Improvement Project. Accordingly, the Escambia Authority is requesting Area of Operation authority from the Board pursuant to Section 159.603, Florida Statutes, to authorize the Escambia Authority to provide financing for the Improvement Project. If the Escambia Authority decides to issue debt to finance the project, a public hearing must be held in Indian River County at a later date, and the Escambia Authority's issuance of the debt must be approved by the Board as required by section 147(f) of the Internal Revenue Code. f t The application was submitted to the Escambia Authority by Vero Beach Leased Housing Associates III, LLLP (the "Company"). The Company is affiliated with Dominium, which is one of the nation's largest affordable housing and management companies. The Company is engaged in developing, rehabilitating, owning, and operating multifamily rental housing for persons of very low, low, middle, and moderate income. The Improvement Project contemplated will allow the Company to make needed improvements and enhancements to the Apartments, while continuing to comply with all applicable tenant eligibility requirements and delivery of tenant services. The Company advises that it expects that the current tenants will be not be significantly inconvenienced by the renovation process, though temporary relocation to other units within the complex might be required in limited instances for the safety and convenience of the tenant. FUNDING No funding is required from Indian River County for this item. No portion of this Resolution shall be deemed to constitute a debt, liability, or obligation of or pledge of the faith and credit of Indian River County. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Board of County Commission adopt the resolution granting area of operation pennission to the Escambia County Housing Finance Authority to undertake the financing through multi -family housing revenue bonds for improvements in connection with the Taylor Pointe Apartments Project. ATTACHMENT Application for Tax Exempt Financing Proposed Resolution Ep Office of the INDIAN RIVER COUNTY * ADMINISTRATOR A Jason E. Brown, County Administrator Michael C. Zito, Assistant County Administrator MEMORANDUM TO: Members of the Board of County FROM: Jason E. Brown County Administrator DATE: June 11, 2018 SUBJECT: Resolution Granting Area of Operation Authority for the Escambia County Housing Finance Auth rity to Issue Multifamily Housing Revenue Bonds to Finance a Project i ndian River County BACKGROUND On July 11, 2017, the Indian River CounV Board of County Commissioners (the Board") granted continuing Area of Operation a ority to the Escambia County Housing Finance Authority (the "Escambia Authority") f r purposes of allowing the Escambia Authority to operate its TBA single-family mortga e loan program and its mortgage credit certificate program within Indian River County (the "County"). Recently, the Escambia Authority received an application requesting t Escambia Authority to consider issuance of its multi- family housing revenue bonds finance or refinance the acquisition, upgrading, reconditioning, rehabilitating, im roving, and beautifying of a 168 -unit Taylor -emote Apartments (formerly known as t e Lindsey Apartments Phases I & II), located 885 33th Circle, Vero Beach, Florida 3 67 (the "Apartments") (collectively, the "Impr� oveiffent Project"). Because the Apartments ar located within the territorial limits of the County, Chapter 159.603, Florida. Statutes, r uires that the Board grant "Area of Operation" authority to the Escambia Authority to pro ide the legal authority to the Escambia Authority to undertake the financing of the I rovement Project. Accordingly, the Escambia Authority is requesting Area of Oper ion authority from the Board pursuant to Section 159.603, Florida Statutes, to authorize t e Escambia Authority to provide financing for the Improvement Project. If the Escambia Authority decides to issue debt to finance the project, a public hearing must be held in Indian River County at a later date, and the Escambia Authority's issuance of the debt must be approved by the Board as required by section 147(f) of the Internal Revenue Code. The application was submitted to the Escambia Authority by Vero Beach Le sed Housing Associates III, LLLP (the "Company"). The Company is affiliated with Do inium, which is one of the nation's largest affordable housing and management companies The Company is engaged in developing, rehabilitating, owning, and operating multifa ' y rental housing for persons of very low, low, middle, and moderate income. The I rovement Project contemplated will allow the Company to make needed improvements nd enhancements to the Apartments, while continuing to comply with all applic le tenant eligibility requirements and delivery of tenant services. The Company advise that it expects that the current tenants will be not be significantly inconvenienced by the renovation process, though temporary relocation to other units within the complex ight be required in limited instances for the safety and convenience of the tenant. FUNDING No funding is required from Indian River County for shall be deemed to constitute a debt, liability, or oblig, Indian River County. RECOMMENDATION item. No portion of this Resolution of or pledge of the faith and credit of Staff recommends that the Board of County Commission adopt the resolution granting area of operation pennission to the Esc bia County Housing Finance Authority to undertake the financing through multi-fam' y housing revenue bonds for improvements in connection with the Taylor Pointe Aparti ents Project. ATTACHMENT Application for Tax Exempt Proposed Resolution RESOLUTION 2018 - A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, APPROVING INDIAN RIVER COUNTY AS AN AREA OF OPERATION FOR THE ESCAMBIA COUNTY HOUSING FINANCE AUTHORITY WITH RESPECT TO THE FINANCING OR REFINANCING BY THE AUTHORITY OF THE ACQUISITION, UPGRADING, RECONDITIONING, REHABILITATING, IMPROVING AND BEAUTIFYING OF A MULTI -FAMILY HOUSING FACILITY LOCATED IN INDIAN RIVER COUNTY; PROVIDING FOR REPEAL OF CONFLICTING PROVISIONS; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, SECTION 1. AREA OF OPERATION AUTHORITY. Pursuant to Section 159.603, Florida Statutes, the Escambia County Housing Finance Authority (the "Escambia Authority") previously has been granted area of operation permission within Indian River County, Florida, for the purpose of operating its TBA single-family mortgage loan program and its mortgage credit certificate program. In addition, the Escambia Authority is hereby granted area of operation authority, pursuant to Section 159.603, Florida Statutes, to operate within Indian River County for the purpose of financing or refinancing the costs of acquiring, upgrading, reconditioning, rehabilitating, improving and beautification by Vero Beach Leased Housing Associates III, LLLP, a Minnesota limited. liability limited partnership, or its affiliate or subordinate corporation (as applicable, the "Company"), or a limited liability company of which the Company is the managing member or a limited partnership of which the Company is the general partner (as applicable, the "Borrower"), of an existing multifamily rental housing facility presently containing 168 units to be known as the Taylor Pointe Apartments (also known as the Lindsey Gardens Apartments/Phases I & II), located at 4885 38`h Circle, Vero Beach, Florida 32967 (the "Apartments"), to provide residential rental housing facilities for persons of very low, low, middle, and moderate income. SECTION 2. NO LIABILITY. No portion of this Resolution shall be deemed to constitute a debt, liability or obligation of or pledge of the faith and credit of Indian River County, Florida, the Escambia Authority, the State of Florida, or any political subdivision thereof. Financing or refinancing the Apartments shall not directly, indirectly, or contingently obligate the Escambia Authority, Indian River County, Florida, the. State of Florida, or any political subdivision thereof to levy or to pledge any form of taxation whatsoever therefore, or to make any appropriation for the payment thereof. 204 RESOLUTION 2018 - SECTION 3. REPEALING CLAUSE. All resolutions or parts thereof of the Board in conflict with the provisions herein contained are, to the extent of such conflict, hereby superseded and repealed. SECTION 4. EFFECTIVE DATE. The resolution was moved for adoption by Commissioner , and the motion was seconded by Commissioner , and, upon being put to a vote, the vote was as follows: Chairman Peter D. O'Bryan Vice Chairman Bob Solari Commissioner Susan Adams Commissioner Joseph E. Flescher Commissioner Tim Zorc The Chairman thereupon declared the resolution duly passed and adopted this 19`h day of June, 2018. ATTEST: Jeffrey R. Smith, Clerk of Court and Comptroller 0 Deputy Clerk BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA M Peter D. O'Bryan, Chairman 205 Application for Tax Exempt Financing for Taylor Pointe Apartments May 31d, 2018 Submitted by: DOMINIUM 2905 Northwest Blvd., Suite 150 Plymouth, MN 55441 Telephone (763) 354-5500 206 DOMINIUM.:: Patricia Lott Escambia County Housing Finance Authority 700 South Palafox. Street, Suite 310 Pensacola, FL 32502 Re: Taylor Pointe Apartments - Application for Tax -Exempt Bonds Dear Ms. Lott, Vero Beach Leased Housing Associates III, LLLP is pleased to submit our application for tax- exempt bonds for Taylor Pointe Apartments in Vero Beach, FL. The Tax -Exempt Bonds will be utilized along with 4% Low Income Housing Tax Credits to perform a $4,200,000 renovation of Taylor Pointe Apartments. If you have any questions or need clarification on our application, please feel free to contact me. We look forward to hearing from you. Thank you, Mark Sween 763-354-5559 msween@dominiumine.com 2965 Northwest 1310. Smw 1;0 • 111vu3muh. AI\ Coymme Fis 76:^354.5;)9 • Weis com 207 SUMMARY OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT GENERAL INFORMATION NAME OF PROJECT Developer/Location Vero Beach Leased Housing Development III, LLC ! Minnesota Development Location 4885 38th Cir, Vero Beach, FL 32967 Type NC/Rehab Acquisition - Rehabilitation Units 168 Bedrooms 390 Total Square Feet 187,826 Funds Requested Total and per unit $95,238 Total Cost $22,729,609 Land Cost $300,000 Acquisition of Building Cost if applicable $12,300,000 Hard Rehab Cost or Construction Cost $4,200,000 General. Contractor TBD Credit Enhancement if utilizing Bonds TBD Set Aside Period 30 Years Set Aside Levels 40% of Units at 60% Area Median Income - Section 42 Minimum Set Aside Tax Exempt Bond Amount Requested: Taxable Bond Amount Requested: Total Bond Amount Requested: Total Project Cost: Multi -family Application 8/2) 1117 16.000.000 $ 0 $ 16,000,000 $ $22,729,609 D-3 208 DOMINIUM,.. Social Services In additional to the selection made under Public Policy Issues, as part of the existing Tax Credit Extended Use Agreements and Bond Land Use Restriction Agreements, the following Social Services are provided and will continue to be following the renovation: 1. Day Care a. There is currently a day care run by Ms. Theresa Harriel-Clark on site, called "Ms. Theresa's Day Care." 2. On -Site Daily Lunch Program a. The Owner currently provides an on-site daily lunch program in which residents can sign up to receive lunches daily through a third party program b. This will continue through the Extended Use Period 3. Tenant Activities a. The Owner currently provides tenant activities including: i. Quarterly on-site health care visits ii. Computer lab with one computer per 50 units iii. Semi-annual first time home buyers seminars iv. On-site literacy training b. These will continue through the Extended Use Period 4. Home Ownership Opportunity Program a. The Owner provides a homeownership opportunity program available to all residents in compliance with their current lease b. The program is available to dedicate 5% of resident's gross rent towards a down payment for individual residents when they move into homeownership Because of the many services that will continue to be provided under the term of the existing Use Agreements, the applicant elects the following from the Application: 1. Health Care a. The Applicant will provide quarterly visits by healthcare, professionals, such as nurses, doctors, and other licensed care providers. 209 2. Resident Activities a. The applicant will hold regularly scheduled activities on site including parties, picnics; and cookouts. 3. Financial. Counseling a. The Applicant will provide quarterly financial counseling including tax preparation and. workshops. 4. First Time Homebuyers Seminars a. The Applicant will continue to arrange for and provide semiannual on-site seminars for residents who are interested in becoming homeowners. 5. Homeownership Opportunity Program a. The Applicant will provide.a homeownership opportunity program to all residents in compliance with their lease in which 5% of resident's gross rent can be set aside toward a down payment for when a resident moves into homeownership. 2905 Northwest Blvd. Sade Ii(i • hlymnlilh. NUN 15441-2847 • C oTpo.rlge 76.1'354.5500 • Fns 763'a4-5iW +lVeh dmilimm1tapnit ilentstrnu 210 DOMINIUM.. Physical Amenities As part of the rehabilitation, several items will be implemented to enhance the quality of life for residents: 1. Handicapped Accessibility: a. Following completion of construction, the property will have 5% of all units (-9 units) be fully ADA compliant b. The applicant has partnered ADA consultant to ensure all pathways and ramps meet ADA standards and guidelines c. Following completion of construction, the clubhouse and common area amenities will have ADA accessibility 2. Security a. As part of the acquisition, the applicant will enter into a contract with Watchtower Security to implement a security camera system throughout the site b. The construction scope of work will include the replacing of all resident keys to Salto Fobs keys that allow for tight management on access throughout the property and the ability to document use i. The Fob will work for both individual units and common area amenities c. As part of construction, the front entry .gate will undergo renovation to be fobbed to monitor and restrict those who can access the site 3. Energy Efficiency a. As part of the construction process, the applicant is partnering with a water conservation consultant in which we will implement a program that includes retrofitting toilets with all new accessories, as well as installing new low flow accessories in the kitchen and bathroom. b. While the scope of work is still being determined, the applicant make it a priority to implement energy efficiency throughout the rehab when able to. This includes lighting as well as mechanical items. 2905 \O1111wem Blvd. S.4w I i0- Illymowh_ AIN 5;441-2644 - (*-ngmww 70'35.1.55(16 - Fan 763*3 5.1-5514 - NVO, daunniinnnp:u tiueuts com 211 Financing Plan Taylor Pointe Apartments will be financed through an immediate first mortgage, low income housing tax credit equity,. an equity bridge loan and seller note. The total tax exempt bond request will not exceed $16,000,000. Permanent 1" Mortgage The applicant is anticipating using a utilizing the Fannie TEL (Tax -Exempt Loan) financing structure. The 1 st mortgage is expected to be in the amount of approximately $11,100,000. This loan will be fully funded at closing. The financing terms are as follows: Term — 15 years Amortization — 30 years Interest Rate — Fixed Equity Bridge Loan The equity bridge loan will be a taxable loan in the amount of $3,800,000. It is expected to bear interest at a rate of LIBOR+ 2.50 %. The loan will bridge the financing gap during construction and will be paid off with tax credit equity. Seller Note The sellers of the two properties, Lindsey Gardens I, Ltd. and Lindsey Gardens II, Ltd. will take seller notes of $1;920,000 and $1,440,000, respectively, for the sale of the two properties. The term of these Seller Notes will not exceed 35 years and will incur interest of the Long -Term AFR at the time of closing. These will be backed with tax-exempt bonds that will be repaid from available cash flow. Federal LIHTC Equity In conjunction with our application for tax-exempt bonds, we will be applying for an allocation of 4% federal low-income tax credits from the Florida Housing Finance Corporation. The estimated amount of tax credit equity is $7,158,568. Tax credit equity will be invested into the project in installments, some of which will occur after construction. :90= Nortl1we+s Blvd. $mte 150 • Ph 1wit1h. DlN 5;.141 -26 -LI • C,n linrme'?fii'3<4-;;00 • Fin 76Y.554•5519 . R'el riammuromparnnruts coil 212 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF UTILITY SERVICES Date: June 13, 2018 To: Jason E. Brown, County Administrator From: Vincent Burke, P.E., Director of Utility Services Prepared By: Arjuna Weragoda, P.E., Capital Projects Manager Subject: Biosolids Technical Advisory Committee DESCRIPTIONS AND CONDITIONS: On June 8, 2018, the Regional Biosolids Symposium was held at Indian River State College's Chastain Campus in Stuart, FL. The Symposium was intended to give the attendees a better understanding of biosolids (i.e. composition, processes, disposal, etc). At the Symposium, the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP), in the interest of protecting Florida's water and natural resources and to better understand the land application of biosolids, committed to creating a Biosolids Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) to evaluate best management practices and potential opportunities for enhancements. ANALYSIS: FDEP is currently seeking nominations for the TAC comprising of agricultural interests, environmental groups, local governments, academia and research entities, representatives from large and small wastewater utilities, biosolids haulers and the Florida Onsite Wastewater Association. The deadline for nominations is July 6, 2018 (see attached email). Since the land application of biosolids is a matter of grave concern to Indian River County, it is in the best interest of the County to have a representative at the TAC. At this time, staff does not have much data on the time commitment or deliverables from the TAC or FDEP. FUNDING: Funding is not required for the subject task. RECOMMENDATION: Staff is looking for direction from the Board of County Commissioners and recommends nomination of a candidate with extensive knowledge in the subject matter to represent Indian River County. ATTACHMENT(s): Email dated June 12, 2018, from Michael Busha C:\Users\legistar\AppData\Local\Temp\BCL Tech nologies\easyPDF 8\@BCL@88200FB6\@BCL@88200F86.docx 213 From: Michael Busha [mailto:mbusha@tcrpc.orgj Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2018.3:50 PM To: Michael Busha <mbusha@tcrpc.org> Cc: jennifer.k.smith@dep.state.fl.us Subject: DEP Announces Creation of Biosolids Technical Advisory Committee FYI. See below. Michael J. Busha, AICP Executive Director Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council 421 SW Camden Avenue Stuart, Florida 34994 (772) 221-4060 From:. "Florida Department of Environmental Protection" <FloridaDEP(@yublic.Qovdelivery.com> Date: June 8, 2018 at 4:12:02 PM EDT To: mbusha(@tcrpc.org Subject: DEP Announces Creation of Biosolids Technical Advisory Committee Reply -To: FloridaDEP(a,public.Qovdelivery.com The Florida Department of Environmental Protection is committed to protecting Florida's water and natural resources. Vital to our mission is working cooperatively with state, local and federal agencies, local communities as well as various stakeholder and interest groups that provide key input, local knowledge and additional data and information to help inform our regulatory and restoration programs. DEP is aware of an increased interest in better understanding the nutrient impacts of the land application of biosolids. Because the Department remains committed to using science to guide our efforts, we are creating a Biosolids Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) to evaluate current management practices and potential opportunities for enhancements to better protect Florida's water resources. DEP is currently seeking nominations for membership on the committee, which will include agricultural interests, environmental groups, local governments, academia and research entities, representatives from large and small wastewater utilities (including the Florida Rural Water Association), biosolids haulers and the Florida Onsite Wastewater Association. The deadline for nominations is 5 p.m., July 6, 2018. Any person interested in learning more about the TAC or submitting a nomination may email BIOSOLIDS TACCDfloridadep.gov. fan t'h. AL - SUBSCRIBER SERVICES m Manage Preferences I Delete Profile I Help G +•4 ,monM p,A This email rias sent using GovDelivery Communications Cloud on behalf of: Florida Department of Environmental Protection 3900 9 Commonwealth Boulevard Tallahassee, FL 32399-3000 850.245.2118 gOVDELIVERY 214 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Peter D. O'Bryan District 4 Chainnall Bob Solari District 5 Vice -Chairman May 30, 2018 Chairman Commissioner Art Graham Commissioner Gary F. Clark Commissioner Julie i. Brown . Commissioner Donald J. Polmann Commissioner Andrew Giles Fay Florida Public Service Commission 2,540 Shumard Oak Boulevard Tallahassee, Florida 32399-0850 Susan Adams District 1 Tim Zorc District 3 Joseph E. Flescher District 2 /316, Re: In re: Joint petition to terminate territorial agreement, by Florida Power & Light and the City of Vero Beach Docket No.: 20170236 -EU In re : Petition by Florida Power & Light Company (FP Q for authority to charge FPL rates to former City of Vero Beach customers and for approval of FPL's accounting treatment for City of Vero Beach transaction Docket No.: 20170235 -EI Dear Chairman Graham and Commissioners: As Chair of the Indian River County Board of County Commissioners, I respectfully ask for your favorable consideration of the sale of the City of Vero Beach electric utility system to FPL as is currently structured. Although I appreciate the Public Service Commission staff support of the termination of the existing territorial agreement between FPL and the City of Vero Beach and the charging of FPL rates, I am extremely disappointed that the Public Service Commission staff opposed the sale as structured *and negotiated by the parties and unanimously approved by the Florida Municipal Power Agency. The acquisition is intended to bring much-needed rate relief to the residents of the City of Vero Beach, and those residents in the unincorporated areas of Indian River County and the Town of Indian River Shores that are currently served by the City of Vero Beach, 180127(h Street, Building A Vero Beach, FL 32960 (772) 226-1490 May 30, 2018 p. 2 while at the same time benefiting FPL's other customers. As recognized in the Public Service Commission staff recommendation, the sale as structured will end "years of controversy" that included "repeated efforts to address issues through legislation, multiple filings with the Commission, and litigation between the City of Vero Beach and the Town of Indian„River Shores and Indian River County." The Indian River County Board of County Commissioners has long believed that the best thing that could be done for economic development and for providing special help for many of our low income families would be for all county electric customers to have lower FPL rates. The Public Service Commission must support the sale as structured in order to bring rate relief and reliable service to the citizens of our community. Sincerely, Peter D. O'Bryan Chairman Indian River County Board of County Commissioners Cc: Public Counsel J.R. Kelly Kenneth Rubin, Esq., FPL 2A-2 June 19, 2018 ITEM 14.A.1 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS INTER -OFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: Members of the Board of County Commissioners DATE: June 14, 2018 SUBJECT: Study of Biosolid Runoff in Blue Cypress Lake FROM: Peter O'Bryan Commissioner, District 4 Commissioners: Request the board consider funding a study to sample biosolids runoff in Blue Cypress Lake. Thanks. 215 BCC AGENDA June 19, 2018 ITEM 14.13.1 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS INTER -OFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: Members of the Board of County Commissioners DATE: June 13, 2018 SUBJECT: Blue Cypress Lake and Biosolids FROM: Commissioner Bob Solari As previously mentioned, a recent Orlando Sentinel article reported some potentially bad news. The article reported: "authorities have documented a surprising spike in contamination at the large lake (Blue Cypress Lake)..." A SJRWMD scientist was quoted: "One of the things that jump out at you is the utilization of biosolids." Chairman O'Bryan and I both attended the June 8 Biosolids Summit held by the IRL Council and TCRPC. I would like to discuss this and related issues with the BCC and some possible options going forward. Thank you. 216 13 m 4 �F w _ �llLw �r �1 f � f 4 m truck dumps a load of biosollds shortly after 7 a.m. ray 1; 20'18, on a Pressley dal ch pastur est of Blue Cypress lake. Photo_• CONTRIBUTED PHOTO BY BARBARA BUHR) ,Photo. TCPalm i ,1I truck dumps a load of biosollds shortly after 7 a.m. ray 1; 20'18, on a Pressley dal ch pastur est of Blue Cypress lake. Photo_• CONTRIBUTED PHOTO BY BARBARA BUHR) ,Photo. TCPalm r IA Ailt "Al I J � �>�'�'.d 1 _ ��� .5 qtr• R cYrh M1� r •a 1 k �'uti r IA e 14 k -t Creek m Creek ark � l�a S Moonshine $oY M(3rsh,, ��:,�• ._� L v M -Canal Zi9-zag Canal _. - _ :' :- �_ 1, ,•, � �f� •T: •,.., - �-- �- - �-:� rr . J 1�r F,�•�Il.t�'1erp- � f'�:�•l�•+! �'f.0 : •Rough Point CI War .�y� '',: average depth 7.8: J;�/�r Cotta e5< ,' )Fl��r — 1 1 r • j . :: ✓Ylt�� "11 S /VISE'S Y�C�c AM NY /:. :� •�.�ll'ti 11'1 jr Z5 ,,� ► Icyt 1 salt . •'p;�-�• _�•-.:• :� - �.f��,��s•��,lr�ff1���}�'�'�t�, �1r' �' �' -3••_.'e1. ..f.' �': .�•��/�1J',�J j�,/+',.�•'J�',jI�..L`�I r+ a :;, - `<1x j�r �; ►f :; r �r ,a� • v Marsh� •eek to, 71" 4 ��:. ��-• _ mss. .ice,- .+'_ �• 1 � !' •if •� ' Holman i' C4naf e v - Green` Cottage Padgett Branch To Route 60Vero Beach r 30mi .) Mudf ash slough Lake Bottom L - sand mud ��*- 'A It -owl F -VA ok I if • T—l"....17IF! 4IRM "A". 121 1 S i� , c is fzYk w 1171, i r1 ( 4 i. ul r 1 k Mai cam JA' A O'er do A Photographs, History;and Poem, Richard H. taker, Ph.D. and'Juanita N. Baker, Ph.D. Forward by George B. Schaller, Ph.D. 14.6. LAKEWATCH Report for Shores in Indian River County Using Data Downloaded 10/17/2016 Introduction for Lakes In this report, we present summary data collected on individual systems that have been part of the LAKEWATCH program. This summary is from the whole period of record for individual systems. The first part of this summary will allow a comparison of the long-term mean nutrient concentrations with the nutrient zone concentrations published by LAKEWATCH staff (Bachmann et al. 2012; http://lakewatch.ifas.ufl.edu/p ublications.shtml). The second part of the summary will allow the comparison of data with Florida Department of Environmental Protections Numeric Nutrient Criteria. Finally, this report examines data for any long-term trends that may be occurring in individual systems but only for systems with five or more years of data. Base File Data: Definitions The long-term data summary will include the following parameters listed with a definition after each one: • County. Name of county in which the lake resides. • Name: Lake name that LAKEWATCH uses for the system. • Latitude and Longitude: Coordinates identifying the exact location of station 1 for each system. • Water Body Type: Four different types of systems; lakes, estuaries, streams and springs. • Surface Area (ha and acre): LAKEWATCH lists the surface area of a lake if it is available. • Mean Depth (m and ft): This mean depth is calculated from multiple depth finder transects across a lake that LAKEWATCH uses for estimating plant abundances. • Period of Record (year): Years a lake has been in the LAKEWATCH program. • TP Zone and TN Zone: Nutrient zones defined by Bachmann et al (2012). • Long -Term TP and TN Mean. Concentration (pg(L: min and maz): Average of all annual means (pg/L) listed with minimum and maximum annual means. • Lake Classification: The new numeric nutrient criteria for Florida require that lakes must first be classified into three group based on color and alkalinity or specific conductance; colored (color greater than 40 Pt -Co units), clear soft water lakes (color less than or equal to 40 Pt -Co units and alkalinity less than or equal to 20 mg/L as CaCO3 or specific conductance less the or equal to 100 gs/cm @25 C), and clear hard water lakes (color less than 40 Pt -Co units and alkalinity greater than 20 mg/L as CaCO3 or specific conductance greater 100 gS/cm @ 25 Q. • Lake Trophic Status (CHL): Tropic state classification using the long-term chlorophyll average concentration and the classification system from; Forsberg, C and S. R Ryding. 1980. Eutrophication parameters and trophic state indices in 30 Swedish waste receiving lakes. Arch. Hydrobiol. 89:189-207). ,-/,O)l 7 /Ole, CITIZEN SCIENCE SINCE 1986 2tv-1 LAKEWATCH Report for Shores in Indian River County Using Data Downloaded 10/17/2016 Base File Data and Nutrient Zone Comparisons for Lakes County Indian River Name Shores Latitude 27.7257 Longitude -81.3924. Water Body Type Lake Surface Area a and acre 642 Mean Depth m and fit 45 Period of Record ear 2002 to 2002 Lake Classification 93 Lake Trophic, Status CHL Hypereatrophic, TP Zone TP4 Long -Term TP Mean Concentration (µg/L, minimum and maximum 58 (58 to 58) TN Zone TN4 Long -Term TN Mean Concentration (pg/L, minimum and maximum 1360 (1360 to 1360) Figure 1. Maps showing Florida phosphorus and nitrogen zones and the nutrient concentrations of the upper 90% of lakes within each zone (Bachmann et al. 2012c). 2t(t4- 2 7P <xuteria nngYl TN arflteria Iig& TPI 7 TNI 450 TP2 Q 21 TN2 I0 642 TP3 F-1 45 TN3 1,087 TP4 93 TN4 1,369 TP5 n 252 TN5 2,701 TP6 n 3% Total phosphorus zones Total nitrogen zones - Figure 1. Maps showing Florida phosphorus and nitrogen zones and the nutrient concentrations of the upper 90% of lakes within each zone (Bachmann et al. 2012c). 2t(t4- 2 LAKEWATCH Report for Shores in Indian River County Using Data Downloaded 10/17/2016 FDEP Nutrient Criteria Lakes For lakes, the applicable numeric interpretations of the narrative nutrient criterion in paragraph 62- 302.530(47)(b), F.A.C., for chlorophyll a are shown in the table below. The applicable interpretations for TN and TP will vary on an annual basis, depending on the availability of chlorophyll a data and the concentrations of nutrients and chlorophyll a in the lake, as descn-W below. The applicable numeric interpretations for TN, TP, and chlorophyll a shall not be exceeded more than once in any consecutive three-year period. If there are sufficient data to calculate the annual geometric mean chlorophyll a and the mean does not exceed the chlorophyll a value for the lake type in the table below, then the TN and TP numeric interpretations for that calendar year shall be the annual geometric means of lake TN and TP samples, subject to the minimum and maximum limits in the table below. However, for lakes with color > 40 PCU in the West Central Nutrient Watershed Region, the maximum TP limit shall be the 490 gg/L TP streams threshold for the region, or if there are insufficient data to calculate the annual geometric mean chlorophyll a for a given year or the annual geometric mean chlorophyll a exceeds the values in the table below for the lake type, then the applicable numeric interpretations for TN and TP shall be the minimum values in the table below. Long -Term Data Summary Lakes: Definitions The following long-term data are the primary trophic state parameters collected by LAKEWATCH volunteers and classification variables color and specific conductance (LAKEWATCH recently began analyzing samples quarterly for color and specific conductance): • Total Phosphorus (gg/L): The nutrient most often limiting growth of plant/algae in Florida's fresh and saltwater environments. • Total Nitrogen (pg/L): Another nutrient needed for aquatic plant/algae growth but only limitnig when nitrogen to phosphorus ratios are generally less than 10. • Chlorophyll -uncorrected (gg/L): Chlorophyll concentrations are used to measure relative abundances of open water algal population. • Secchi (ft), Secchi (m): Secchi measurements are estimates of water clarity (how far one can see into the water) and are listed with English and metric units. • Color (Pt -Co Units): LAKEWATCH measures true color, which is the color of the water after particles have been filter out. • Specific Conductance (gS/cm@25°C): Measurement of the ability of water to conduct electricity and can be used to estimate the amount of dissolve materials in water. '2,V - 3 LAKEWATCH Report for Shores in Indian River County Using Data Downloaded 10/17/2016 Parameter Minimum and Maximum Annual Means Mean of Annual Means (Sampling ears Total Phosphorus /L 58-58 58(l) Total Nitrogen 1360-1360 1360(l) Chlorophyll- uncorrected 46.6-46.6 46.6(l) Secchi ft 1.8 - 1.8 1.8(l) Secchi m 0.5-0.5 0.5(l) Color Pt -Co Units 30-30 30 (1) S 'fic Conductance (ILS/cm5 Mean Total Mean Total Lake Classification Phosphorus FDEP Numeric Nutrient Criteria Long Term Geometric Annual Minimum calculated Maximum calculated numeric Mean Lake Color and Geometric numeric interpretation interpretation Long -Term Geometric Mean Annual Geometric Annual Geometric Annual Geometric Annual Geometric Mean Color, Alkalinity and Specific Conductance Chlorophyll- corrected Mean Total Mean Total Mean Total Mean Total Phosphorus Nitrogen Phosphorus Nitrogen > 40 Platinum Cobalt Units 20 gg/L 50 gg/L 1270 gg/L 160 gg/L' 2230 gg/L Colored Lakes < 40 Platinum Cobalt Units and > 20 mg/L CaCO3 20 gg/L 30 gg/L 1050 µg2 90 gg/L 1910 gg/L or >100 gS/cm@25 C Clear Hard Nater Lakes _< 40 Platinum Cobalt Units and < 20 mg/L CaCO3 6 gg/L 10 gg/L 51 gg/L 30 gg/L 930 gg/L or < 100 µSicm@25 C Clear Soft Water Lakes 1 For lakes with color > 40 PCU in the West Central Nutrient Watershed Region, the maximum TP limit shall be the 490 gg/L TP streams threshold for the region. For the purpose of subparagraph 62-302.531(2)(b)l., F.A.C., color shall be assessed as true color and shall be free from turbidity. Lake color and alkalinity shall be the long-term geometric mean, based on a minimum of ten data points over at least three years with at least one data point in each year. If insufficient alkalinity data are available, long-term geometric mean specific conductance values shall be used, with a value of <100 gS/cm@25 C used to estimate the mg/L CaCO3 alkalinity concentration until such time that alkalinity data are available. 2(Q- 4 LAKEWATCH Report for Shores in Indian River County Using Data Downloaded 10/17/2016 Trend Analyses Lakes The following data are for linear regression statistics derived by plotting annual average total phosphorus, total nitrogen, chlorophyll, and Secchi data by year of data collection. Linear regression analysis is a common statistical approach used to determine if significant trends are occurring over time. These analyses define statistics based on the best fit line drawn through the data after plotting them with year on the horizontal line (x-axis) and the data value on the vertical line (y-axis). Figure 2 shows example plots with linear regression statistic of lakes that show significant total phosphorus increases, decreases and no change over time. The statistics that are listed include the following: • Plumber of years (n): This is simply the number of years of data that were used to calculate annual means. • Intercept (a): This is the value on the y-axis that the fitted line would cross if the x-axis where zero. • Slope (b): This is the rate at which the fitted line increases (positive number) or decreases (negative number). • Coefficient of determination (RZ): This value is an indication of how much variance above and below the fitted line there is in the data. This value ranges from 0 to 1. A high value means a tight fit and a low value means a loose fit. • Probability of Significance (p): For most statistical analyses a p -value of less than 0.05 means the statistic is significant and analyses with p -values greater than 0.05,are not significant. Statistic Total Phosphorus Total Nitrogen Chlorophyll Secchi Number of Years n Intercept a Slope b Coefficient of Determination z Probability of Significance Potential Trend The following graphs on the next two pages are trend analyses examining regression between year and annual means of total phosphorus, total nitrogen, chlorophyll, and Secchi depth for Shores in Indian River County. If there are no plots then there is less than five years of data, which is not enough for the analysis. -U( — 5 LAKEWATCH Report for Stick Marsh in Indian River County Using Data Downloaded 10/17/2016 Introduction for Lakes In this report, we present summary data collected on individual systems that have been part of the LAKEWATCH program. This summary is from the whole period of record for individual systems. The first. part of this summary will allow a comparison of the long-term mean nutrient concentrations with the nutrient zone concentrations published by LAKEWATCH staff (Bachmann et al. 2012; http://lakewatch.ifas.ufl.edWpublications.shtml). The second part of the summary will allow the comparison of data with Florida Department of Environmental Protections Numeric Nutrient Criteria. Finally, this report examines data for any long-term trends that may be occurring m individual systems but only for systems with five or more years of data. Base File Data: Definitions The long-term data summary will include the following parameters listed with a definition after each one: • County: Name of county in which the lake resides. • Name: Lake name that LAKEWATCH uses for the system. • Latitude and Longitude: Coordinates identifying the exact location of station 1 for each system. • Water Body Type: Four different types of systems; lakes, estuaries, streams and springs. • Surface Area (ha and acre): LAKEWATCH lists the surface area of a lake if it is available. • Mean Depth (m and ft): This mean depth is calculated from multiple depth finder transects across a lake that LAKEWATCH uses for estimating plant abundances. • Period of Record (year): Years a lake has been in the LAKEWATCH program. • TP Zone and TN Zone: Nutrient zones defined by Bachmann et al (2012). • Long -'Term TP and TN Mean Concentration (pg/L: min and maz): Average of all annual means (pg/L) listed with minimum and maximum annual means. • Lake Classification: The new numeric nutrient criteria for Florida require that lakes must first be classified into three group based on color and alkalinity or specific conductance; colored (color greater than 40 Pt -Co units), clear soft water lakes (color less than or equal to 40 Pt -Co units and alkalinity less than or equal to 20 mg/L as CaCO3 or specific conductance less the or equal to 100 gs/cm @25 C), and clear hard water lakes (color less than 40 Pt -Co units and alkalinity greater than 20 mg/L as CaCO3 or specific conductance greater 100 gS/cm @ 25 Q. • Lake Trophic Status (CHL): Tropic state classification using the long-term chlorophyll average concentration and the classification system from; Forsberg, C and S_ R Ryding_ 1980. Eutrophication parameters and trophic state indices in 30 Swedish waste receiving lakes. Arch. Hydrobiol. 89:189-207). Crr ZEN SCIENCE SINCE 1966 LAKEWATCH Report for Stick Marsh in Indian River County Using Data Downloaded 10/17/2016 Base File Data and Nutrient Zone Comparisons for Lakes County Indian River Flame Stick Marsh Latitude 27.82 Longitude -80.7121 Water Body Type Lake Surface Area a and acre 963 ha or 2379 acre Mean Depth mand ft) 1.7mor5.7ft Period of Record ear 2001 to 2013 Lake Classification Colored Lake Lake Trophic Status CHL Hypereutrophic TP Zone TP4 Long -Term TP Mean Concentration (µg/L, minimum and maximum 142 (70 to 244) TN Zone TN4 Long -Term TN Mean Concentration (µg/L, minimum and maximum 1746 (1459 to 2058) M Total nitrogen zones Figure 1. Maps showing Florida phosphorus and nitrogen zones and the nutrient concentrations of the upper 90% of lakes within each zone (Bachmann et al. 2012c)_ 2 TP cmeaea Pg/L TPI 7 TP2 rj 21 TP3 F-1 45 TP4 93 TP5 252 TK 0 355 Total phosphorus zones Total nitrogen zones Figure 1. Maps showing Florida phosphorus and nitrogen zones and the nutrient concentrations of the upper 90% of lakes within each zone (Bachmann et al. 2012c)_ 2 Tia crdteria qg L TNI 450 CA TN2 Q 642 TN3 Q 1,087 Ti44 1,369 TN5 0 2,701 Total nitrogen zones Figure 1. Maps showing Florida phosphorus and nitrogen zones and the nutrient concentrations of the upper 90% of lakes within each zone (Bachmann et al. 2012c)_ 2 LAKEWATCH Report for Stick Marsh in Indian River County Using Data Downloaded 10/17/2016 FDEP Nutrient Criteria Lakes For lakes, the applicable numeric interpretations of the narrative nutrient criterion in paragraph 62- 302.530(47)(b), F.A.C., for chlorophyll a are shown in the table below. The applicable interpretations for TN and TP will vary on an annual basis, depending on the availability of chlorophyll a data and the concentrations of nutrients and chlorophyll a in the lake, as described below_ The applicable numeric interpretations for TN, TP, and chlorophyll a shall not be exceeded more than once in any consecutive three-year period. If there are sufficient data to calculate the annual geometric mean chlorophyll a and the mean does not exceed the chlorophyll a value for the lake type in the table below, then the TN and TP numeric interpretations for that calendar year shall be the annual geometric means of lake TN and TP samples, subject to the minimum and maximum limits in the table below. However, for lakes with color > 40 PCU in the West Central Nutrient Watershed Region, the maximum TP limit shall be the 490 gg/L TP streams threshold for the region, or if there are insufficient data to calculate the annual geometric mean chlorophyll a for a given year or the annual geometric mean chlorophyll a exceeds the values in the table below for the lake type, then the applicable numeric interpretations for TN and TP shall be the minimum values in the table below. Long -Term Data Summary Lakes: Definitions The following long-term data are the primary trophic state parameters collected by LAKEWATCH volunteers and classification variables color and specific conductance (LAKEWATCH recently began analyzing samples quarterly for color and specific conductance): • Total Phosphorus (gg/L): The nutrient most often limiting growth of plant/algae in Florida's fresh and saltwater environments. • Total Nitrogen (pg/L): Another nutrient needed for aquatic plantialgae growth but only limiting when nitrogen to phosphorus ratios are generally less than 10_ • Chlorophyll -uncorrected (gg/L): Chlorophyll concentrations are used to measure relative abundances of open water algal population. • Secchi (ft), Secchi (m): Secchi measurements are estimates of water clarity (how far one can see into the water) and are listed with English and metric units. • Color (Pt -Co Units): LAKEWATCH measures true color, which is the color of the water after particles have been filter out. • Specific Conductance (gS/cm@25°C): Measurement of the ability of water to conduct electricity and can be used to estimate the amount of dissolve materials in water - 3 2tr,-8 LAKEWATCH Report for Stick Marsh in Indian River County Using Data Downloaded 10/17/2016 Parameter Minimum and Maximum Annual Means Mean of Annual Means (Sampling ears Total Phosphorus /L 70-244 142 13 Total Nitro 1459-2058 1746 13 Chlorophyll- uncorrected 23.2-91.4 43.0 13 Secchi ft 1.6-3.1 2.1(13) Secchi m 0.5-0.9 0.6(13) Color (Pt -Co Units 65-100 81 (13 Specific Conductance S/cm 5 461-866 667 Lake Classification Colored Lake Phosphorus FDEP Numeric Nutrient Criteria Long Term Geometric Annual Minimum calculated Maximum calculated numeric Mean Lake Color and Geometric numeric interpretation interpretation Long -Term Geometric Mean Annual Geometric Annual Geometric Annual I Geometric Annual Geometric Mean Color, Alkalinity and Specific Conductance Chlorophyll- cone ted Mean Total Mean Total Mean Total Mean Total Phosphorus Nitrogen Phosphorus Nitrogen > 40 Platinum Cobalt Units 20 gg/L 50 gg/L 1270 gg/L 160 gg/L' 2230 gg/l, Colored Lakes < 40 Platinum Cobalt Units and > 20 mg/L CaCO3 20 gg/L 30 gg/L 1050 gg/L 90 gg/L 1910 gg/L or >100 gS/cm@25 C Clear Hard Water Lakes _< 40 Platinum Cobalt Units and < 20 mg/L CaCO3 6 gg/L 10 gg/L 51 gg/L 30 gg/L 930 gg/L or < 100 µSfcm a@25 C Clear Soft Water Lakes ' For lakes with color > 40 PCU in the West Central Nutrient Watershed Region, the maximum TP limit shall be the 490 gg/L TP streams threshold for the region. For the purpose of subparagraph 62-302.531(2)(b)l., F.A.C., color shall be assessed as true color and shall be free from turbidity. Lake color and alkalinity shall be the long-term geometric mean, based on a minimum of ten data points over at least three years with at least one data point in each year. If insufficient alkalinity data are available, long-term geometric mean specific conductance values shall be used, with a value of <100 gS/cm@25 C used to estimate the mg/L CaCO3 alkalinity concentration until such time that alkalinity data are available. OL -vco-°I LAKEWATCH Report for Stick Marsh in Indian River County Using Data Downloaded 10/17/2016 Trend Analyses Lakes The following data are for linear regression statistics derived by plotting annual average total phosphorus, total nitrogen, chlorophyll, and Secchi data by year of data collection. Linear regression analysis is a common statistical approach used to determine if significant trends are occurring over time. These analyses define statistics based on the best fit Bine drawn through the data after plotting them with year on the horizontal line (x-axis) and the data value on the vertical line (y-axis). Figure 2 shows example plots with linear regression statistic of lakes that show significant total phosphorus increases, decreases and no change over time. The statistics that are listed include the following: • Plumber of years (n): This is simply the number of years of data that were used to calculate annual means. • Intercept (a): This is the value on the y-axis that the fitted line would cross if the x-axis where zero. • Slope (b): This is the rate at which the fitted line increases (positive number) or decreases (negative number). • Coefficient of determination (RZ): This value is an indication of how much variance above and below the fitted line there is in the data. This value ranges from 0 to 1. A high value means a tight fit and a low value means a loose fit. • Probability of Significance (p): For most statistical analyses a p. -value of less than 0.05 means the statistic is significant and analyses with p -values greater than 0.05 are not significant. Statistic Total Phosphorus Total Nitrogen Chlorophyll Secchi Number of Years n 13 13 13 13 Intercept a -6380 11952 3507 1.34 Slope b 3.25 -5.09 -1.73 -0.07 Coefficient of Determination z 0.07 0.01 0.1.5 0.33 Probability of Significance 0.37 0.72 0.19 0.04 Potential Trend No Trend No Trend No Trend Decreasing The following graphs on the next two pages are trend analyses examining regression between year and annual means of total phosphorus, total nitrogen, chlorophyll, and Secchi depth for Stick Marsh in Indian River County. If there are no plots then there is less than five years of data, which is not enough for the analysis. 5 Ive - (0 C) C) �s y L tD 0 Q IN tri O .I_— (I 0 z Q Cr (0 CV J C) C) a7 CR C) Q Z OC) _ r R1 0-" C) r Stick IMarsh (Indian River) y = 3.25x + -6380.20 0.07 i 2002 2004 2006 2008 2090 2012 Year Stick Marsh (Indian River) y = -5.09x + 11952.38 i • i • i • i i • • i t • • • 2002 2004 2006 2008 2090 2012 Year Stick Marsh (Indian River) y = -5.09x + 11952.38 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 Year 6 29c49 - l l i i • • i i i • t • 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 Year 6 29c49 - l l i I V A 1 r f } o C3 C) cn CD C7 N MA Stick Marsh (Indian River) y = -1.73x + 3506.72 k2 =0-15 • 2662 2004 2006 .2008 2016 2412 Year Stick Marsh Ondlan River) y = =0.07x x-133.62 R'=0.33 • • • • • • 2662 2004 2006 .2008 2016 2412 Year Stick Marsh Ondlan River) y = =0.07x x-133.62 R'=0.33 • 2602 2004 2006 2,008 2010 2012 Year 7 -.Ito- J2_ • • 2602 2004 2006 2,008 2010 2012 Year 7 -.Ito- J2_ LAKEWATCH Report for Blue Cypress in Indian River County Using Data Downloaded 10/17/2016 Introduction for Lakes In this report, we present summary data collected on individual systems that have been part of the LAKEWATCH program. This summary is from the whole period of record for individual systems. The first part of this summary will allow a comparison of the long-term mean nutrient concentrations with the nutrient zone concentrations published by LAKEWATCH staff (Bachmann et al. 2012; http://lakewatch.ifas.ufl.edu/publications.shtml). The second part of the summary will allow the comparison of data with Florida Department of Environmental Protections Numeric Nutrient Criteria. Finally, taus report examines data for any long-term trends that may be occurring in individual systems but only for systems with five or more years of data. Base File Data: Definitions The long-term data summary will include the following parameters listed with a definition after each one: • County: Name of county in which the lake resides. • Name: Lake name that LAKEWATCH uses for the system. • Latitude and Longitude: Coordinates identifying the exact location of station 1 for each system. • Water Body Type: Four different types of systems; lakes, estuaries, streams and springs. • Surface Area (ha and acre): LAKEWATCH lists the surface area of a lake if it is available. • Mean Depth (m and ft): This mean depth is calculated from multiple depth finder transects across a lake that LAKEWATCH uses for estimating plant abundances. • Period of Record (year): Years a lake has been in the LAKEWATCH program. • TP Zone and TN Zone: Nutrient zones defined by Bachmann et al (2012). • Long -Term TP and T11 Mean. Concentration (tg/L: min and max): Average of all annual means (gg/L) listed with minimum and maximum annual means. • Lake Classification: The new numeric nutrient criteria for Florida require that lakes must first be classified into three group based on color and alkalinity or specific conductance; colored (color greater than 40 Pt -Co units), clear soft water lakes (color less than or equal to 40 Pt -Co units and alkalinity less than or equal to 20 mg1L as CaCO3 or specific conductance less the or equal to 100 gs/cm @25 C), and clear hard water lakes (color less than 40 Pt -Co units and alkalinity greater than 20 mg/L as CaCO3 or specific conductance greater 100 16/cm @ 25 Q. • Lake Trophic Status (CHL): Tropic state classification using the long-term chlorophyll average concentration and the classification system from; Forsberg, C and S. R. Ryding. 1980. lutrophication parameters and trophic state indices in 30 Swedish waste receiving lakes. Arch. Hydrobiol. 89:189-207). LAKEWATCH CITIZEN SCIENCE SINCE 1986 1 LAKEWATCH Report for Blue Cypress in Indian River County Using Data Downloaded 10/17/2016 Base File Data and Nutrient Zone Comparisons for Lakes County Indian River Flame Blue Cypress Latitude 27.744 Longitude -80.7574 Water Body Type Lake Surface Area and acre 2759 ha or 6817 acre Mean Depth m and ft 2.3 m or 7.5 ft Period of Record (year) 2003 to 2014 Lake Classification Colored Lake Lake Trophic Status CHL Eutrophic, TP Zone TP4 Long -Term TP Mean Concentration (µg/L, minimum and maximum 128 (94 to 162) TN Zone TN4 Long -Term TW Mean Concentration (pg/L, minimum and maximum 1377 (1128 to 1609) li 0 Total nitrogen zones Figure 1. Maps showing Florida phosphorus and nitrogen zones and the nutrient concentrations of the upper 90% of lakes within each zone (Bachmann et al. 2012c). 2 '21(o- P( TP aniteda "g& TP1 7 TP2 21 TP3 45 TP4 93 TP5 ❑ 252 TP6 355 Total phosphorus zones 0 Total nitrogen zones Figure 1. Maps showing Florida phosphorus and nitrogen zones and the nutrient concentrations of the upper 90% of lakes within each zone (Bachmann et al. 2012c). 2 '21(o- P( LAKEWATCH Report for Blue Cypress in Indian River County Using Data Downloaded 10/17/2016 FDEP Nutrient Criteria Lakes For lakes, the applicable numeric interpretations of the narrative nutrient criterion in paragraph 62- 302.530(47)(b), F.A.C., for chlorophyll a are shown in the table below. The applicable interpretations for TN and TP will vary on an annual basis, depending on the availability of chlorophyll a data and the concentrations of nutrients and chlorophyll a in the lake, as described below. The applicable numeric interpretations for TN, TP, and chlorophyll a shall not be exceeded more than once in any consecutive three-year period. If there are sufficient data to calculate the annual geometric mean chlorophyll a and the mean does not exceed the chlorophyll a value for the lake type in the table below, then the TAT and TP numeric interpretations for that calendar year shall be the annual geometric means of lake TN and TP samples, subject to the minimum and maximum limits in the table below. However, for lakes with color > 40 PCU in the West Central Nutrient Watershed Region, the maximum TP limit shall be the 490 gg/L TP streams threshold for the region, or if there are insufficient data to calculate the annual geometric mean chlorophyll a for a given year or the annual geometric mean chlorophyll a exceeds the values in the table below for the lake type, then the applicable numeric interpretations for TN and TP shall be the minimum values in the table below. Long -Term Data Summary Lakes: Definitions The following long-term data are the primary trophic state parameters collected by LAKEWATCH volunteers and classification variables color and specific conductance (LAICWATCH recently began analyzing samples quarterly for color and specific conductance): • Total Phosphorus (pg/L): The nutrient most often limiting growth of plant/algae in Florida's fresh and saltwater environments. • Total Nitrogen (pg/L): Another nutrient needed for aquatic plant/algae growth but only limiting when nitrogen to phosphorus ratios are generally less than 10. • Chlorophyll -uncorrected (gg/L): Chlorophyll concentrations are used to measure relative abundances of open water algal population. • Secchi (ft), Seechi (m): Secchi measurements are estimates of water clarity (how far one can see into the water) and are listed with English and metric units. • Color (Pt -Co Units): LAKEWATCH measures true color, which is the color of the water after particles have been filter out. • Specific Conductance (µS/cm@25°C): Measurement of the ability of water to conduct electricity and can be used to estimate the amount of dissolve materials in water. 3 2I(p-(5 LAKEWATCH Report for Blue Cypress in Indian River County Using Data Downloaded 10/17/2016 Parameter Minimum and Maximum Annual Means Mean of Annual Means (Sampling ears Total Phosphorus /L 94- 162 128 12 Total Nitrogen 1128-1609 1377 12 Chlorophyll- uncorrected 4.2-11.3 7.4(12) Annual Geometric Secchi ft 1.3-2.3 1.8(12) Secchi m 0.4-0.7 0.5(12) Mean Total Color Pt -Co Units 122-261 1.96 12 Specific Conductance S/ 5 Q 129-194 170 (8) Lake Classification Colored Lake 1270 gg/L 160 µg2' FDEP Numeric Nutrient Criteria Long Term Geometric Annual Minimum calculated Maximum calculated numeric Mean Lake Color and Geometric numeric interpretation interpretation Long -Term Geometric Mean Annual Geometric Annual Geometric Annual Geometric Annual Geometric Mean Color, Alkalinity and Specific Conductance Chlorophyll- corrected Mean Total Mean Total Mean Total Mean Total Phosphorus Nitrogen Phosphorus Nitrogen > 40 Platinum Cobalt Units 20 gg/L 50 gg/L 1270 gg/L 160 µg2' 2230 µg/L Colored Lakes < 40 Platinum Cobalt Units and > 20 mg/L CaCO3 20 gg/L 30 gg/L 1050 µg/L 90 µg2 1910 µg2 or >100 µS/cm@25 C Clear Hard Water Lakes _< 40 Platinum Cobalt Units and:5 20 mg/L CaCO3 6 gg/L 10 µg2 51 gg/L 30 gg/L 930 gg/L or < 100 pSfcm@25 C Clear Soft Water Lakes ' For lakes with color > 40 PCU in the West Central Nutrient Watershed Region, the maximum TP limit shall be the 490 µg/L TP streams threshold for the region. For the purpose of subparagraph 62-302.531(2)(b)l.., FA -C-, color shall be assessed as true color and shall be free from turbidity. Lake color and alkalinity shall be the longterm geometric mean, based on a minimum of ten data points over at least three years with at least one data point in each year. If insufficient alkalinity data are available, long-term geometric mean specific conductance values shall be used, with a value of <100 µS/cm@25 C used to estimate the mg/L CaCO3 alkalinity concentration until such time that alkalinity data are available. 4 21P -1(P LAKEWATCH Report for Blue Cypress in Indian River County Using Data Downloaded 10/17/2016 Trend Analyses Lakes The following data are for linear regression statistics derived by plotting annual average total phosphorus, total nitrogen, chlorophyll, and Secchi data by year of data collection. Linear regression analysis is a common statistical approach used to determine if significant trends are occurring over time. These analyses define statistics based on the best fit line drawn through the data after plotting them with year on the horizontal line (x-axis) and the data value on the vertical line (y-axis). Figure 2 shows example plots with linear regression statistic of lakes that show significant total phosphorus increases, decreases and no change over time. The statistics that are listed include the following: • plumber of years (n): This is simply the number of years of data that were used to calculate annual means. • Intercept (a): This is the value on the y-axis that the fitted line would cross if the x-axis where zero. • dope (b): This is the rate at which the fitted line increases (positive number) or decreases (negative number). • Coefficient of determination (RZ): This value is an indication of how much variance above and below the fitted line there is in the data. This value ranges from 0 to 1. A high value means a tight fit and a low value means a loose fit_ • Probability of Significance (p): For most statistical analyses a p -value of less than 0.05 means the statistic is significant and analyses with p -values greater than 0.05 are not significant. Statistic Total Phosphorus Total Nitrogen Chlorophyll Secchi Number of Years n 12 12 12 12 Intercept a -12151 -5260 -454 16 Slope h 6.11 3.30 0.23 -0.01 Coefficient of Determination a 0.82 0.01 0.16 0.01 Probability of Si ificance 0.00 0.79 0.20 0.80 Potential Trend ]Increasing No Trend No Trend No Trend The following graphs on the next two pages are trend analyses examining regression between year and annual means of total phosphorus, total nitrogen, chlorophyll, and Secchi depth for Blue Cypress in Indian River County. If there are no plots then there is less than five years of data, which is not enough for the analysis. 5 2.t�"11 C Y C) C C3 o r c - C3.. w C) O 1- 00 C) Co 01) N 0 cO t-2 C'1 Z (iJ r (a 0 1- C) G • IBIue Cypress (Indian River) y=6.11x+-12151.08 RZ = 0.82 • • • •1 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2094 Year Blue Cypress (Indian River) y = 3.3x + -5260.1 W=0-01 • • 1 • 2004 2006 2048 2010 2012 2014 Year • • • 1 • 2004 2006 2048 2010 2012 2014 Year H T T �+ O c- 0- 0 Q0 0 OD 'F V 0 (Blue Cypress (Indian River) y = 0.23x + -44.16 RZ=0.16 • 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 Year Blue Cypress (Indian River) y= -0.01x+1'5.75 R'=0_01 • Y • • • • 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 Year Blue Cypress (Indian River) y= -0.01x+1'5.75 R'=0_01 • Y • 2004 2006 2008 2010 20'12 2014 Year • • • 2004 2006 2008 2010 20'12 2014 Year LAKEWATCH Report for Farm 13 in Indian River County Using Data Downloaded 10/17/2016 Introduction for Lakes In this report, we present summary data collected on individual systems that have been part of the LAKEWATCH program. This summary is from the whole period of record for individual systems. The first part of this summary will allow a comparison of the long-term mean nutrient concentrations with the nutrient zone concentrations published by LAKEWATCH staff (Bachmann et al. 2012; http://lakewatch.ifas.ufl.edu/publications.shtml). The second part of the summary will allow the comparison of data with Florida Department of Environmental Protections Numeric Nutrient Criteria. Finally, this report examines data for any long-term trends that may be occurring in individual systems but only for systems with five or more years of data. Base File Data: Definitions The long-term data summary will include the following parameters listed with a definition after each one: • County: Name of county in which the lake resides. • Name: Lake name that LAKEWATCH uses for the system. • Latitude and Longitude: Coordinates identifying the exact location of station 1 for each system. • Water Body Type: Four different types of systems; lakes, estuaries, streams and springs. • Surface Area (ha and acre): LAKEWATCH lists the surface area of a lake if it is available. • ]Mean Depth (m and ft): This mean depth is calculated from multiple depth finder transects across a lake that LAKEWATCH uses for estimating plant abundances. • Period of Record (year): Years a lake has been in the LAKEWATCH program. • TP Zone and TN Zone: Nutrient zones defined by Bachmann et al (2012). • Long -Term TP and Thi Mean Concentration (M&: min and max): Average of all annual means (pg/L) listed with minimum and maximum annual means. • Lake Classification: The new numeric nutrient criteria for Florida require that lakes must first be classified into three group based on color and alkalinity or specific conductance; colored (color greater than 40 Pt -Co units), clear soft water lakes (color less than or equal to 40 Pt -Co units and alkalinity less than or equal to 20 mg(L as CaC43 or specific conductance less the or equal to 100 ps/cm @25 C), and clear hard water lakes (color less than 40 Pt -Co units and alkalinity greater than 20 mg/L as CaCO3 or specific conductance greater 100 µS/cm @ 25 Q. • Lake Trophic Status (CHL): Tropic state classification using the long-term chlorophyll average concentration and the classification system fiom; Forsberg, C and S_ R_ Ryding. 1980. Eutrophication parameters and trophic state indices in 30 Swedish waste receiving lakes. Arch. Hydrobiol. 89:189-207)_ LAKE WATCH CITREN SCIENCE SINCE 1986 1 2_k - zb LAKEWATCH Report for Farm 13 in Indian River County Using Data Downloaded 10/17/2016 Base File Data and Nutrient Zone Comparisons for Lakes County Indian River Flame Farm 13 Latitude 27.7966 Lon itude -80.7165 Water Body Type Lake Surface Area and acre 252 Mean Depth m and ft 1.9 m or 6.2 ft Period of Record ear 2001 to 2013 Lake Classification Colored Lake Lake Trophic, Status CHL Eutrophic, TP Zone TP4 Long -Term TP Mean Concentration (µg/L, minimum and maximum 147 (77 to 240) TN Zone TN4 Long -Term. TN Mean Concentration (µg/L, minimum and maximum 1752 (1532 to 2126) Total nitrogen zones Figure 1. Maps showing Florida phosphorus and nitrogen zones and the nutrient concentrations of the upper 90% of lakes within each zone (Bachmann et al. 2012c). V. 2t Q -Z( TP caetera pg/L TP1 7 TP2 0 21 TP3 0 45 TP4 93 TP5 .� 252 TP6 ® 355 Total phosphorus zones---�' Total nitrogen zones Figure 1. Maps showing Florida phosphorus and nitrogen zones and the nutrient concentrations of the upper 90% of lakes within each zone (Bachmann et al. 2012c). V. 2t Q -Z( LAKEWATCH Report for Farm 13 in Indian River County Using Data Downloaded 10/17/2016 FDEP Nutrient Criteria Lakes For lakes, the applicable numeric interpretations of the narrative nutrient criterion in paragraph 62- 302.530(47)(b), F.A.C., for chlorophyll a are shown in the table below. The applicable interpretations for TN and TP will vary on an annual basis, depending on the availability of chlorophyll a data and the concentrations of nutrients and chlorophyll a in the lake, as described below. The applicable numeric interpretations for TN, TP, and chlorophyll a shall not be exceeded more than once in any consecutive three-year period. If there are sufficient data to calculate the annual geometric mean chlorophyll a and the mean does not exceed the chlorophyll a value for the lake type in the table below, then the IN and TP numeric interpretations for that calendar year shall be the annual geometric means of lake TN and TP samples, subject to the minimum and maximum limits in the table below. However, for lakes with color > 40 PCU in the West Central Nutrient Watershed Region, the maximum TP limit shall be the 490 µg2 TP streams threshold for the region, or if there are insufficient data to calculate the annual geometric mean chlorophyll a for a given year or the annual geometric mean chlorophyll a exceeds the values in the table below for the lake type, then the applicable numeric interpretations for TN and TP shall be the minimum values in the table below. Long -Term Data Summary Lakes: Definitions The following long-term data are the primary trophic state parameters collected by LAKEWATCH volunteers and classification variables color and specific conductance (LAKEWATCH recently began analyzing samples quarterly for color and specific conductance): • Total Phosphorus (pg/L): The nutrient most often limiting growth of plant/algae in Florida's fresh and saltwater environments. • Total Nitrogen (pg/L): Another nutrient needed for aquatic plantialgae growth but only limiting when nitrogen to phosphorus ratios are generally less than 10. • Chlorophyll -uncorrected (µg/L): Chlorophyll concentrations are used to measure relative abundances of open water algal population. • Secchi (ft), Secchi (m): Secchi measurements are estimates of water clarity (how far one can see into the water) and are listed with Posh and metric units. • Color (Pt -Co Units): LAKEWATCH measures true color, which is the color of the water after particles have been filter out. • Specific Conductance (1iS/cm@251C): Measurement of the ability of water to conduct electricity and can be used to estimate the amount of dissolve materials in water- ,2- k� - 22 LAKEWATCH Report for Farm 13 in Indian River County Using Data Downloaded 10/17/2016 Parameter Minimum and Maximum Annual Means Mean of Annual Means (Sampling ears Total Phosphorus /L 77-240 147 13 Total Nitrogen 1532-2126 1752 13 Chlorophyll- uncorrected 24.7-89.7 39.1 13 Secchi ft 1.5-3.8 2.2(13) Secchi m 0.5 - 1.1 0.7(13) Color (Pt -Co Units) 1 67-114 87 (13 Specific Conductance S/cm 5 446-854 667 Lake Classification Colored Lake Phosphorus FDEP Numeric Nutrient Criteria Long Term Geometric Annual Minimum calculated Maximum calculated numeric Mean Lake Color and Geometric numeric interpretation interpretation Long -Term Geometric Mean Annual Geometric Annual Geometric Annual Geometric Annual Geometric Mean Color, Alkalinity and Specific Conductance Chlorophyll- corrected Mean Total Mean Total Mean Total Mean Total Phosphorus Nitrogen Phosphorus Nitrogen > 40 Platinum Cobalt Units 20 gg/L 50 gg/L 1270 gg/L 160 gg/L' 2230 gg/L Colored Lakes < 40 Platinum Cobalt Units and > 20 mg/L CaCO3 20 µg2 30 gg/L 1050 gg/L 90 µg2 1910 µg2 or >100 gS/cm@25 C Clear Hard Water Lakes _< 40 Platinum Cobalt Units and < 20 mg/L CaCO3 6 gg/L 10 gg/L 51 gg/L 30 gg/L 930 gg/L or < 100 µS/cm a@25 C Clear Soft Water Lakes 1 For lakes with color > 40 PCU in the West Central Nutrient Watershed Region, the maximum TP limit shall be the 490 gg/L TP streams threshold for the region. For the purpose of subparagraph 62-302.531(2)(b)l., F.A.C., color shall be assessed as true color and shall be free from turbidity. Lake color and alkalinity shall be the long-term geometric mean, based on a minimum of ten data points over at least three years with at least one data point in each year. If insufficient alkalinity data are available, long-term geometric mean specific conductance values shall be used, with a value of <100 µS/cm@25 C used to estimate the mg/L CaCO3 alkalinity concentration until such time that alkalinity data are available. n 2 N -23 LAKEWATCH Report for Farm 13 in Indian River County Using Data Downloaded 10/17/2016 Trend Analyses Lakes The following data are for linear regression statistics derived by plotting annual average total phosphorus, total nitrogen, chlorophyll, and Secchi data by year of data collection. Linear regression analysis is a common statistical approach used to determine if significant trends are occurring oder time. These analyses define statistics based on the best fit line drawn through the data after plotting them with year on the horizontal line (x-axis) and the data value on the vertical line (y-axis). Figure 2 shows example plots with linear regression statistic of lakes that show significant total phosphorus increases, decreases and no change over time. The statistics that are listed include the following: o Number of years (n): This is simply the number of years of data that were used to calculate annual means. o Intercept (a): This is the value on the y-axis that the fitted line would cross if the x-axis where zero. o Slope (b): This is the rate at which the fitted Mine increases (positive number) or decreases (negative number). o Coefficient of determination (RZ): This value is an indication of how much variance above and below the fitted line there is in the data. This value ranges from 0 to 1. A high value means a tight fit and a low value means a loose fit. o Probability of Significance (p): For most statistical analyses a p -value of less than 0.05 means the statistic is significant and analyses with p -values greater than 0.05 are not significant. Statistic Total Phosphorus Total Nitrogen Chlorophyll Secchi Number of Years n 13 13 13 13 Intercept a -3031 6395 3484 240 Slope h 1.58 -2.31 -1.72 -0.12 Coefficient of Determination z 0.02 0.00 0.15 0.53 Probability of Significance 0.64 0.88 0.19 0.01 Potential Trend No Trend No Trend No Trend Decreasing The following graphs on the next two pages are trend analyses examining regression between year and annual means of total phosphorus, total nitrogen, chlorophyll, and Secchi depth for Farm 13 in Indian River County. If there are no plots then there is less than five years of data, which is not enough for the analysis. 5 Zt�-z4 C) C) CIDC) N. i O 0 C L CN 0- 0 cnO O 7 L U Q r cu p 0 O F- r Farm 13 (Indian River) Y =1.53x + -3030.74 RZ = 0.02 • • • 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 Year Farm 13 (Indian River) Y = -2.31x + 6394.59 RZ = 0 • • • 2002 2,004 2000 2008 2010 2012 Year C) C) T 1 CD _r_ OL 0 0 U CD 0 0 (N U 'IT p m 11=arrn 13 (Indian Rived y = -1.72x + 3483.71 R2=0.15 • 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 Year Farm 13 (Indian River) y = -0.12x + 239.85 Rz 0.53 • • • • • • • •0 • 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 Year Farm 13 (Indian River) y = -0.12x + 239.85 Rz 0.53 • 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 Year VA 2 Re -20 • • • 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 Year VA 2 Re -20 June 19, 2018 ITEM 14.C.1 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS INTER -OFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: Members of the Board of County Commissioners DATE: June 13, 2018 SUBJECT: Indian River Lagoon Master Plan FROM: Susan Adams Commissioner, District 1 As we approach the budget process, I would like to discuss budgeting $25,000 to create an Indian River Lagoon Management Plan. Many years ago, the Indian River County Board of County Commissioners (the Board) created a Beach Management Plan that has been a very helpful tool in addressing and guiding our beach renourishment program. I believe a similar plan would be very helpful as we look at ways to address the issues facing the Indian River Lagoon ensuring that we are tackling lagoon projects in a logical manner that allows us to maximize the limited funding available, while positioning the county to take advantage of federal and state grant monies. The Board has wisely set aside money to help fund lagoon projects. I believe it is in our best interest to ensure we are spending that money in a responsible and well thought out manner. The Board has been very forward thinking in prioritizing projects that have had a great impact on the sustainable health of the Indian River Lagoon. From small habitat restoration projects to large wastewater projects, Indian River County has been very proactive in their commitment to the health of the lagoon. My goal would be to build on this commitment. While our borders may be rigid, those of the lagoon are not as it flows through neighboring counties and municipalities. By looking at the strategies utilized by our regional counterparts, we have an opportunity to create a stronger program in Indian River County. Brevard County, working with local agencies, organizations, scientists and advocates has set up a funding program and plan to address the lagoon in their area. While they are larger and have more resources available, they also have more issue_ s facing the lagoon. Using the Brevard County process as an example could be very beneficial for us: we also have an involved community of advocates, organizations 217 scientists and agencies wanting to be part of a positive solution. While I would not propose as in depth of a plan as they Indian River Lagoon MasterPlan have created, I do believe we need to look at the projects in our county that are proposed, look at project areas that may be missing, look at the science and data and bring everything together in a comprehensive manner. With so many factors impacting the health of the lagoon, a management plan would help guide our efforts to ensure that we are addressing all areas of influence. The Indian River Lagoon National Estuary Program (IRLNEP) is currently in the Comprehensive Conservation and Management Plan (CCMP) process. Part of this process includes compiling a list of projects from each jurisdiction. While this is a work in progress, the expectation is that the list will be updated on an annual basis once the CCMP is completed and adopted. Project collection from multiple sources is ongoing by the IRLNEP. The City of Vero Beach also has their Lagoon Legacy Program that we have actively participated in. I would propose that we use these lists and projects as a starting point in creating a Lagoon Management Plan for Indian River County. Creating a Indian River County Lagoon Management Plan will ensure that we are undertaking projects in a logical manner building on Indian River County's established commitment to the health of the lagoon, allowing us to maximize the limited funding available, while positioning the County to take advantage of federal and state grant monies. Attachments: Brevard County Save Our Lagoon Plan 2018 IRLNEP IRC Preliminary Project List 2 218 Save Our Indian River Lagoon Project Plan 2018 Update for Brevard County, Florida Prepared by: Prepared for: Tetra Tech, Inc. Brevard County 1558 Village Square Blvd, Suite 2 Natural Resources Management Department Tallahassee, Florida 32309 2725 Judge Fran Jamieson Way, Building A Phone: (850) 536-8115 Viera, Florida 32940 C1oseWaters LLC Closewaters, LLC 665 Seville Court Satellite Beach, Florida, 32937 Phone: (305) 814-2599 Contract: 260070-14-009 Task Order: 14-009-002 r EMU revard ..I,-JlC 4 U H T V April 2018 219 Save Our Indian River Lagoon Project Plan 2018 Update, April 2018 Table of Contents Acknowledgements.................................................................................................................... vi List of Acronyms and Abbreviations ......................................................................................... viii ExecutiveSummary ..............:.................................................................................................... ix Section1. Background.......................................................................................................... 1 1.1. Return on Investment and Economic Value................................................................. 3 1.1.1 Areas of Economic Value at Risk.......................................................................... 4 1.2. Maximizing Benefits and Managing Risk...................................................................... 5 1.2.1 Project Selection to Maximize Return on Investment ............................................ 6 Section2. Approach.............................................................................................................. 8 2.1. Plan Focus Area.......................................................................................................... 8 Section 3. Pollutant Sources in the IRL Watershed...............................................................10 Section4. Project Options....................................................................................................13 4.1. Projects to Reduce Pollutants.....................................................................................13 4.1.1 Public Outreach and Education............................................................................14 4.1.2 WWTF Upgrades.................................................................................................26 4.1.3 Sewer Laterals Rehabilitation (added in 2018) .....................................................28 4.1.4 Septic System Removal and Upgrades................................................................29 4.1.5 Stormwater Treatment.........................................................................................42 4.1.6 Surface Water Remediation System....................................................................49 4.2. Projects to Remove Pollutants....................................................................................49 4.2.1 Muck Removal.....................................................................................................50 4.2.2 Artificial Flushing..................................................................................................54 4.3. Projects to Restore the Lagoon...................................................................................58 4.3.1 Oyster Restoration...............................................................................................59 4.3.2 Living Shorelines.................................................................................................60 4.3.3 Seagrass Planting (added in 2018)......................................................................64 4.4. Respond......................................................................................................................66 4.4.1 Adaptive Management to Report, Reassess, and Respond.................................67 4.4.2 Research Needs..................................................................................................67 Section 5. 2017 Plan Update................................................................................................70 5.1. New Projects in the 2017 Plan Supplement................................................................70 5.2. Unfunded Projects in the 2017 Plan Supplement........................................................77 Section 6. 2018 Plan Update................................................................................................79 6.1. Additional Project Benefits..........................................................................................79 6.2. Project Funding...........................................................................................................80 Prepared by Tetra Tech, Inc. and Closewaters, LLC 220 Save Our Indian River Lagoon Project Plan 2018 Update, April 2018 6.2.1 Revenue Projection Update.................................................................................80 6.2.2 Contingency Fund Reserve..................................................................................80 6.3. New Projects in the 2018 Plan Update........................................................................81 6.4. Project Changes.........................................................................................................87 6.4.1 Withdrawals.........................................................................................................87 6.4.2 Revisions.............................................................................................................88 Section 7. Summary of the Plan through the 2018 Update...................................................91 Appendix A: Funding Needs and Leveraging Opportunities ....................................................101 Appendix B: References.................................................................i.......................................103 Appendix C: Maps of the Septic System Removal Areas Identified in the Original Plan ..........109 Appendix D: Summary of Stormwater Projects Identified in the Original Plan .........................121 Appendix E: Seagrasses.........................................................................................................127 Prepared by Tetra Tech, Inc. and Closewaters, LLC 221i Save Our Indian River Lagoon Project Plan 2018 Update, April 2018 List of Tables Table ES -1: Summary of Project Types, Costs, and Nutrient Reductions in the 2018 Update of the Save Our Indian River Lagoon Project Plan.........................................................................A Table 1: Economic Impact Scenarios Based Upon the Condition of the IRL ............................... 3 Table 2: Summary of Load Reductions and Projects in Central IRL Zone SEB .......................... 8 Table 3: Loading from Different Sources in Each Sub-lagoon...................................................11 Table 4: Nutrients in Lawn Fertilizer Sold in Brevard County by Fiscal Year .............................14 Table 5: Brevard County Funding for the Blue Life Campaign by Fiscal Year (FY)....................16 Table 6: Estimated TN and TP Not Attenuated in FY2014-2015...............................................19 Table 7: Reductions from Fertilizer Ordinance Compliance to Date..........................................20 Table 8: Estimated TN and TP Reductions and Costs from Additional Fertilizer Ordinance Compliance...............................................................................................................................20 Table 9: Estimated TN and TP Reductions and Costs from Grass Clippings Campaign ............ 22 Table 10: Estimated TN Reductions and Costs from Reducing Excess Irrigation ......................23 Table 11: Estimated TN and TP Reductions and Costs from Stormwater BMP Maintenance .... 25 Table 12: Estimated TN Reductions and Costs from Septic System Maintenance ....................26 Table 13: TN Concentrations in WWTF Reclaimed Water.........................................................27 Table 14: Cost per Pound of TN Removed from WWTF Upgrades to Improve Reclaimed Water .................................................................................................................................................28 Table 15: Estimated Sewer Laterals Rehabilitation TN and TP Reductions and Costs..............29 Table 16: Location of Septic Systems in Brevard County..........................................................30 Table 17: Septic System Effluent Concentrations and Decay Rates..........................................31 Table 18: Travel Time Based on Distance from Septic System to Waterbody ...........................31 Table 19: Parameter Concentrations from Each Buffer Zone....................................................31 Table 20: Cost to Remove Septic Systems Based on Distance from a Surface Waterbody ......31 Table 21: Short -Term Opportunities for Septic System Removal in Banana River Lagoon........ 32 Table 22: Short -Term Opportunities for Septic System Removal in North IRL........................... 33 Table 23: Short -Term Opportunities for Septic System Removal in Central IRL........................33 Table 24: Summary of Septic System Removal Projects by Sub-Lagoon..................................33 Table 25: Long -Term Opportunities for Septic System Connections.........................................34 Table 26: Summary of Septic System Scoring Criteria..............................................................38 Table 27: Septic Tank Upgrades and Costs for Highest Priority Septic Systems within 55 Yards ofa Surface Waterbody............................................................................................................38 Table 28: Traditional Stormwater BMPs with TN and TP Removal Efficiencies .........................43 Table 29: LID and GI BMPs and TN and TP Removal Efficiencies............................................44 Table 30: TN and TP Removal Efficiencies for BAM.................................................................45 Table 31: Estimated TN and TP Reductions and Costs for BAM Projects.................................45 Table 32: Summary of Benefits and Costs of Central IRL Surface Water Remediation System 49 Table 33: Muck Acreages in the IRL System.............................................................................50 Table 34: Mosquito Lagoon Estimated Costs for the Proposed Muck Removal Projects ........... 50 Table 35: North IRL Estimated Costs for Proposed Muck Removal Projects .............................51 Table 36: Banana River Lagoon Estimated Costs for the Proposed Muck Removal Projects .... 51 Table 37: Central IRL Estimated Costs for the Proposed Muck Removal Projects ....................51 Table 38: Nitrogen and Phosphorus Reductions from Muck Removal.......................................51 Table 39: Phase I Top Ranked Potential Artificial Flushing Project Locations ...........................57 Table 40: Computed Hydraulics for Connections at Select Locations........................................58 Table 41: Pollutant Load Reductions for Shoreline Management Practices...............................61 Table 42: Initial Estimated Oyster Reef Living Shoreline TN and TP Reductions and Costs ...... 61 Table 43: 2018 Updated Estimated Oyster Reef TN and TP Reductions and Costs..................61 Table 44: Estimated Vegetative Living Shoreline TN and TP Reductions and Costs.................62 Prepared by Tetra Tech, Inc. and Closewaters, LLC 222 Save Our Indian River Lagoon Project Plan 2018 Update, April 2018 Table 45: Average Nutrients in Seagrass from 1996-2009........................................................64 Table 46: Table 46 from the Original Plan is Now Table 66 .......................................................65 Table 47: Average Seagrass Lost and Nutrients Made Available to Other Primary Producers in 2015..........................................................................................................................................65 Table 48: Costs for Pilot Study to Evaluate Seagrass Planting Techniques..............................66 Table 49: Cost Share per Pound of TN Removed by Project Type for the 2017 Plan Supplement ...................................................................................................................................... ........70 Table 50: Summary of New Projects Added in the 2017 Save Our Indian River Lagoon Project PlanSupplement.............................................................................:..............................:..........71 Table 51: Summary of Unfunded Projects from the 2017 Save Our Indian River Lagoon Project PlanSupplement.......................................................................................................................77 Table 52: Cost Share per Pound of TN Removed by Project Type for the 2018 Plan Update .... 79 Table 53: Pollutants Removed by Different Project Types.........................................................80 Table 54: Summary of New Projects for the Save Our Indian River Lagoon Plan 2018 Update 82 Table 55: Summary of Year 0 and Year 1 Project Withdrawals.................................................87 Table 56: Summary of Stormwater Basin Withdrawals..............................................................88 Table 57: Updates to Sykes Creek and Grand Canal Dredging Projects...................................89 Table 58: Banana River Lagoon Project Reductions to Meet Five -Month TMDL .......................92 Table 59: Banana River Lagoon Project Reductions Compared to Full Year Loading ...............92 Table 60: North IRL Project Reductions to Meet Five -Month TMDL..........................................92 Table 61: North IRL Project Reductions Compared to Full Year Loading..................................93 Table 62: Central IRL Project Reductions to Meet Five -Month TMDL.......................................93 Table 63: Central IRL Project Reductions Compared to Full Year Loading...............................93 Table 64: Muck Removal, Oyster Reef, and Living Shoreline Project Reductions Compared to Nutrient Loadings from Muck Flux.............................................................................................94 Table 65: Summary of Projects, Estimated TN and TP Reductions, and Costs ......................... 95 Table 66a: Timeline for Funding Needs (Table 46 in the Original Save Our Indian River Lagoon ProjectPlan).............................................................................................................................97 Table 66b: Timeline for Funding Needs (Table 46 in the Original Save Our Indian River Lagoon ProjectPlan) with inflation.........................................................................................................99 Table D-1: Summary of TN Reductions from Stormwater Projects in Banana River Lagoon ...122 Table D-2: Summary of TP Reductions from Stormwater Projects in Banana River Lagoon ...123 Table D-3: Summary of TN Reductions from Stormwater Projects in North IRL ......................124 Table D-4: Summary of TP Reductions from Stormwater Projects in North IRL ......................125 Table D-5: Summary of TN Reductions from Stormwater Projects in Central IRL ...................126 Table D-6: Summary of TP Reductions from Stormwater Projects in Central IRL....................126 Table E-1: Estimates of Biomass for Halodule Species ...........................................................130 Table E-2: Total Biomass in Seagrasses Along Brevard County.............................................130 Table E-3: Estimates of Nutrient Content for Halodule species ...............................................130 Table E-4: Average Amount of Nutrients Contained in Seagrass from 1996-2009 ..................131 Table E-5: Guide for Ranking Potential Seagrass Restoration Sites .......................................132 Prepared by Tetra Tech, Inc. and Closewaters, LLC Save Our Indian River Lagoon Project Plan 2018 Update, April 2018 List of Figures Figure ES -1: Save Our Indian River Lagoon Project Implementation Schedule ......................... xii Figure 1: Decline of Commercial Fishing and Increasing Fish Kill Severity ................................. 5 Figure 2: Likelihood of a Healthy IRL as Nutrients are Removed ............................................... 7 Figure 3: Locations of the Banana River Lagoon (BRL), North IRL (NIRL), and Central IRL (CTRL) Sub-Lagoons............................................................................................................................. 9 Figure 4: Banana River Lagoon TN (left) and TP (right) Annual Average Loads by Source....... 11 Figure 5: North IRL TN (left) and TP (right) Annual Average Loads by Source ..........................12 Figure 6: Central IRL TN (left) and TP (right) Annual Average Loads by Source.......................12 Figure 7: TN and TP in Lawn Fertilizer Sold in Brevard County by Fiscal Year .........................14 Figure 8: New Blue Life Digital Billboard...................................................................................17 Figure 9: Florida Today Sticky Note..........................................................................................17 Figure 10: Example Diagram of an In -Tank Two Stage Biofilter................................................35 Figure 11: Example Diagram of an In -Ground Stacked Biofilter................................................36 Figure 12: Map of Locations for Septic System Upgrades in North IRL.....................................39 Figure 13: Map of Locations for Septic System Upgrades in Banana River Lagoon and North IRL .................................................................................................................................................40 Figure 14: Map of Locations for Septic System Upgrades in Central IRL..................................41 Figure 15: Map of Selected Stormwater Projects in Banana River Lagoon and North IRL ......... 46 Figure 16: Map of Selected Stormwater Projects in Banana River Lagoon and North IRL, continued..................................................................................................................................47 Figure 17: Map of Selected Stormwater Projects in North IRL and Central IRL.........................48 Figure 18: Location of Potential Muck Removal Projects in Mosquito Lagoon, Banana River Lagoon, and North IRL..............................................................................................................52 Figure 19`. Location of Potential Muck Removal Projects in North IRL and Central IRL .............53 Figure 20: Phase I Potential Artificial Flushing Project Locations..............................................56 Figure 21: Shoreline Survey to Identify Locations for Oyster Reefs and Living Shorelines ........ 63 Figure 22: Estimated Economic Value of Some Seagrass Services..........................................64 Figure 23: Types of Seagrass Planting Units for Pilot Study......................................................66 Figure 24: Comparison of the Original Plan Cost by Project Category (Left) versus the 2017 Plan Supplement Cost by Project Category (Right)...........................................................................78 Figure 25: Comparison of the Original Plan Cost by Project Category (Left) versus the 2018 Plan Update Cost by Project Category (Right)..................................................................................90 Figure 26: Funding for Reduce Projects....................................................................................91 Figure C-1: Map of South Beaches Priority Septic System Areas............................................111 Figure C-2: Map of South Central Priority Septic System Areas..............................................112 Figure C-3: Map of Sykes Creek Priority Septic System Areas ...............................................113 Figure C-4: Map of City of Melbourne Priority Septic System Areas........................................114 Figure C-5: Map of City of Rockledge Priority Septic System Areas........................................115 Figure C-6: Map of City of Cocoa Priority Septic System Areas ..............................................116 Figure C-7: Map of City of Titusville Priority Septic System Areas...........................................117 Figure C-8: Map of City of Palm Bay Priority Septic System Areas .........................................118 Figure C-9: Map of City of Palm Bay Septic System Areas Near Sewer Lines ........................119 Figure C-10: Map of City of West Melbourne Priority Septic System Areas.............................120 Figure E-1: Mean Areal Extent of Seagrass and Mean Length of Transects ...........................128 Figure E-2: Mean Chlorophyll -a Concentrations......................................................................128 Figure E-3: Conceptual Model Illustrating a Shift in Biomass Among Major Primary Producers with Increasing Nutrient Enrichment...............................................................................................129 Prepared by Tetra Tech, Inc. and Closewaters, LLC Save Our Indian River Lagoon Project Plan 2018 Update, April 2018 Acknowledgements We would like to thank the following people who provided input in the development and update of this plan: Scientist Subject Matter Experts: o Dr. Duane DeFreese, Indian River Lagoon National Estuary Program and Indian River Lagoon Council Executive Director o Dr. Richard (Grant) Gilmore, expert in Indian River Lagoon fisheries and ecology o Dr. Charles Jacoby, St. Johns River Water Management District Supervising Environmental Scientist o Dr. Kevin Johnson, Florida Institute of Technology Associate Professor, Marine and Environmental Systems o Dr. Mitchell A Roffer, Florida Institute of Technology Adjunct Professor, President Roffer's Ocean Fishing Forecasting Service, Inc. o Dr. Jonathan Shenker, Florida Institute of Technology Associate Professor of Marine Biology o Dr. John Trefry, Florida Institute of Technology Professor of Marine and Environmental Systems o Martin S. Smithson, Sebastian Inlet District Administrator o Joel Steward, St. Johns River Water Management District Supervising Environmental Scientist (Retired) o Dr. John Windsor, Florida Institute of Technology Oceanography and Environmental Science Professor Emeritus and Program Chair Economic Impacts Subject Matter Experts: o Eric Garvey, Brevard County Tourism Development Council Executive Director o Herb Hiller, Brevard County Tourism Development Council Consultant on Ecotourism o Vince Lamb, Indian River Lagoon Council Management Board, Florida Master Naturalist, Entrepreneur o Dr. Michael H. Slotkin, Florida Institute of Technology Associate Professor, Nathan M. Bisk School of Business o Laurilee Thompson, Brevard County Tourism Development Council, Commercial Fisheries Expert, Entrepreneur o Dr. Alexander Vamosi, Florida Institute of Technology Associate Professor, Nathan M. Bisk School of Business o Jim Brandenburg, Brevard County Property Appraiser Information Technology Agencies: o Florida Department of Environmental Protection o St. Johns River Water Management District o Florida Department of Health o Space Coast Tourism Development Council o Space Coast Association of REALTORS° o Brevard County Natural Resources Management Department o Brevard County Utility Services Department o Brevard County Property Appraiser Information Technology o. Brevard County Budget Office Citizen Oversight Committee: o Courtney Barker, Finance Member o Todd Swingle, Finance Alternate o Lorraine Koss (2017 Chair), Science Member Prepared by Tetra Tech, Inc. and Closewaters, LLC Save Our Indian River Lagoon Project Plan 2018 Update, April 2018 o Charles Venuto, Science Alternate o David Lane, Tourism Member o Karen McLaughlin, Tourism Alternate o Gene Artusa, Real Estate Member o Danielle Bowden, Real Estate Alternate o John Byron (2017 Vice Chair), Technology Member o Vinnie Taranto, Technology Alternate o Stephany Eley, Education/Outreach Member o John Durkee, Education/Outreach Alternate. o John Windsor, Lagoon Advocacy Member o Terry Casto, Lagoon Advocacy Alternate Photographs on cover: Top from http://spacecoastdaily.com/2013/09/hands-across-lagoon-set-for-sept-28/ Bottom left from http://saItfiishing.about.com/od/Best-Saltwater-Fishing-Destinations/fl/Kayak-Fishing-the-Indian-River- Lagoon.htm Bottom middle from http:// v isitportcanaveral.com/fishing/ Bottom right from haps://www.facebook.com/RocketmanFlorida/ Prepared by Tetra Tech, Inc. and Closewaters, LLC Save Our Indian River Lagoon Project Plan 2018 Update, April 2018 List of Acronyms and Abbreviations AFB Air Force Base BAM Biosorption Activated Media BMAP Basin Management Action Plan BMP Best Management Practice BOD Biochemical Oxygen Demand CBPO Chesapeake Bay Program Office CCMP Comprehensive Conservation and Management Plan DMMA Dredged Material Management Area E. coli Escherichia coli EMV Expected Monetary Value ERU Equivalent Residential Unit FDACS Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services FDEP Florida Department of Environmental Protection FDOH Florida Department of Health FDOT Florida Department of Transportation FEMA Federal Emergency Management Agency FWC Florida Fish and Wildlife Commission FY Fiscal Year GI Green Infrastructure GIS Geographic Information System I&I Inflow and Infiltration IFAS Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences IRL Indian River Lagoon LID Low Impact Development MAPS Managed Aquatic Plant Systems MGD Million Gallons Per Day NEP National Estuary Program ppb Parts per Billion SJRWMD St. Johns River Water Management District SRF State Revolving Fund STEP Septic Tank Effluent Pumping (system) STEPL Spreadsheet Tool for Estimating Pollutant Loads SWIL Spatial Watershed Iterative Loading (model) TMDL Total Maximum Daily Load TN Total Nitrogen TP Total Phosphorus OF University of Florida USEPA U.S. Environmental Protection Agency WRF Water Reclamation Facility WWTF Wastewater Treatment Facility Prepared by Tetra Tech, Inc. and Closewaters, LLC Save Our Indian River Lagoon Project Plan 2018 Update, April 2018 Executive Summary The Indian River Lagoon (IRL) system includes Mosquito Lagoon, Banana River Lagoon, and Indian River. This is a unique and diverse system that connects Volusia, Brevard, Indian River, St. Lucie, and Martin counties. The IRL is part of the National Estuary Program (NEP), one of 28 estuaries of National Significance, and has one of the greatest diversity of plants and animals in the nation. A large portion of the IRL system, 71% of its area and nearly half its length, is within Brevard County and provides County residents and visitors many opportunities and economic benefits. However, the balance of this delicate ecosystem has been disturbed as development in the area has led to harmful impacts. Stormwater runoff from urban and agricultural areas, wastewater treatment facility (WWTF) discharges, septic systems, and excess fertilizer applications have led to harmful levels of nutrients and sediments entering the lagoon. These pollutants create cloudy conditions in the lagoon and feed algal blooms, both of which negatively affect the seagrass community that provides habitat for much of the lagoon's marine life. In addition, these pollutants lead to muck accumulation, which releases (fluxes) nutrients and hydrogen sulfide, depletes oxygen, and creates a lagoon. bottom that is not hospitable to seagrass, shellfish, or other marine life. Efforts have been ongoing for decades to address these sources of pollution. Despite significant load reductions, in the last five years, signs of human impact to the IRL system have been magnified. In 2011, the "superbloom" occurred, an intense algal bloom in the Mosquito Lagoon, Banana River Lagoon, and North IRL, as well as a secondary, less intense bloom in the Central IRL. There have also been recurring brown tides; unusual mortalities of dolphins, manatees, and shorebirds; and large fish kills due to low dissolved oxygen from decomposing algae. Local governments and the St. Johns River Water Management District (SJRWMD) have been proactive in implementing projects over the last several decades. However, to restore the lagoon to health and prosperity, additional funds are needed to eliminate current excess loading and remove the legacy of previous excess loading. Therefore, the County placed a Save Our Indian River Lagoon '/2 cent sales tax referendum on the ballot in November 2016, which passed and will provide a funding stream for the types of projects listed in this plan for Brevard County and its municipalities. The Save Our Indian River Lagoon Project Plan outlines local projects planned to meet water quality targets and improve the health, productivity, aesthetic appeal, and economic value of the lagoon. Implementation of these projects is contingent upon funding raised through the %2 cent sales tax. This sales tax funding would also allow the County to leverage additional dollars in match funding from state and federal grant programs because the IRL ecosystem is valued not only in Florida but also nationally. Funding implementation of this plan would help to restore this national treasure. If additional funding is provided through matching funds from other sources, additional projects may be implemented, which would increase the overall plan cost, and/or project timelines may be moved up to allow the benefits of those projects to occur earlier than planned. Lagoon ecosystem response may lag several years behind completion of nutrient reductions; however, major steps must begin now to advance progress on the long road to recovery. In the development of this plan, Subject Matter Experts were consulted to provide feedback on the plan elements. The experts all agreed that there is a "critical mass" of nutrient reductions that must be achieved to see a beneficial result in the IRL. This critical level of nutrient reduction will Prepared by Tetra Tech, Inc. and Closewaters, LLC Save Our Indian River Lagoon Project Plan 2018 Update, April 2018 be achieved through the implementation of the projects in this plan. During plan development, it was estimated that the benefit of restoring the lagoon has a present value of $6 billion and a cost of $300 million. Therefore, implementing this plan to restore the IRL is an excellent investment in the future of Brevard County's community and economy with a benefit to cost ratio of 20:1. In order to restore the lagoon's balance, Brevard County seeks to accelerate implementation of a multi -pronged approach to Reduce pollutant and nutrient inputs to the lagoon from fertilizer, reclaimed water from WWTFs, septic systems, and stormwater; Remove the accumulation of muck from the lagoon bottom; Restore water -filtering oysters and related lagoon ecosystem services; and monitor progress to Respond to changing conditions, technologies, and new information by amending the plan to include actions that will be most successful and cost-effective for significantly improving the health, productivity, and natural resilience of the IRL. The portfolio of projects in this plan were selected as the most cost-effective suite of options to achieve water quality and biological targets for the lagoon system. Investment has been distributed among a set of project types with complimentary benefits to reduce future risk of failure. Nearly two-thirds (2/3) of the effort and expense is directed toward muck removal to address decades of past excess nutrient loading. Approximately one-third (1/3) of the effort is split among multiple efforts to reduce incoming load to healthy levels, restore natural filtration, measure success, and respond with annual plan updates. The plan projects have been prioritized and ordered to deliver improvements to the lagoon in the most beneficial spatial and temporal sequence. The implementation of this plan is expected to result in a healthy IRL system. 4 This 2018 Update to the Save Our Indian River Lagoon Project Plan contains the second set of project updates, new approved projects, and schedule accelerations to the plan. Local stakeholders submitted projects to Brevard County for inclusion in the plan. The appointed Citizen Oversight Committee reviewed the submitted projects and made a recommendation to the Board of County Commissioners on which projects should be added to the SOIRLPP. This update includes those projects that were reviewed by the Citizen Oversight Committee and approved for inclusion by the Board of County Commissioners. A summary of the types of projects included in the plan, as well as the associated costs and nutrient reduction benefits are shown in Table ES -1. The timing of the projects is shown in Figure ES -1. Despite the considerable cost of restoration, analysis demonstrates that the economic cost of inaction is double the cost of action. Furthermore, although there are many tangible and intangible benefits for saving the lagoon, the readily estimated return on investment for three benefits — tourism, waterfront property values, and commercial fisheries — is 10% to 26% depending on how quickly the actions in this plan can be completed. Prepared by Tetra Tech, Inc. and Closewaters, LLC O d (0 O L w 0 r R Q D O T" O N d L C N N O U vi O Q. V CD .O a O m E 7 N w CD (o H m >`, - (0 Q m rn Co I- rn� tm a n. r` coo V) v_ z z (0 cov_ cn cn v � - �+ N C aV R 7 CO Q co N� r- ' O C tt Ih (o CO0 e— Z Z ,zt M N 000 tt O N O (Ace N a U N N� 3 O L a � O O O CO M N U) (C) LO O A �t O LO — 'ct 0 M CO r• O O m 2 z69 64 MCO di CO ffl � d3 CO Efl 69 "t (fl — ER 't fA — ER M d9 a7 � Q C O V fn Cl) d' 00 moi, O O M co [t ' ' O C L r 00 ,t co 0o 0o O) O O co co W O E N r- O h LO r— O d, S O N to C) w >+ O U y In co - (n 61? O t` ti N N It — CO ( 00 t}• N rl: N NC 3 69 r r Z a) V O r• O O O 't M O f- O O O O 00 O M O (D O LO w O O (O (n O (O O d O 00 O O O 00 CO (O — N - O f— O) N Lo 0 0 0 -4 M O O— Lo N O U'> h E d 0 N co It O (O O Cl) Lo 00 'q Lo 00 00 O O O O 00 h •'' � ao 43,00 O r` N N m M O f6V N4. — 69 (n — M r` 69 N N M r- O O N CO O 69 rz 69 O — r• — CO W O 64 69 69 69 N 69 69 69 m H � � c O c N x W L L ) a) a) C N Q. H w U a) c (D N N V O d p L o m 0 E 0 E mC a) -6 U) O d C U U a) a) d Y U O c Z) U co 0) E E E i c6 00 a) > —� O U O .O+ (D W J (n U) Cl) _ O 3: O N a) U LL N ,U U ,U W ES) a, a) a) C) ep > O O N >+ O> I (n a) (A a) O (4 U a) u) (n H O> N d O U O I� r C U O a) j O O 0 m a a p CL ami aa)) W } 00 M r- L-, L M L L �� s -- m M` f� N cc } e -E W Save Our Indian River Lagoon Project Plan 2018 Update, April 2018 Section 1. Background The Indian River Lagoon (IRL) system includes Mosquito Lagoon, Banana River Lagoon, and Indian River. A large portion of the IRL system, 71% of its area and nearly half its length, is within Brevard County (County) and provides County residents and visitors many opportunities. However, the balance of this delicate ecosystem has been disturbed as development in the area has led to harmful impacts. Stormwater runoff from urban and agricultural areas, wastewater treatment facility (WWTF) discharges, septic systems, and excess fertilizer applications have led to harmful levels of nutrients and sediments entering the lagoon. In addition, these pollutants lead to muck accumulation on the lagoon bottom, which fluxes nutrients and creates a lagoon bottom that is not conducive to seagrass, shellfish, or benthic invertebrate growth. Efforts have been ongoing to address these sources of pollution. The Indian River Lagoon System and Basin Act of 1990 (Chapter 90-262, Laws of Florida) was enacted to protect the IRL system from WWTF discharges and the improper use of septic tanks. The act includes three objectives: elimination of surface water discharges, investigation of feasibility of reuse, and centralization of wastewater collection and treatment facilities (Florida Department of Environmental Protection [FDEP] 2016). This act led to the removal of effluent discharges to the lagoon from more than 40 WWTFs (St. Johns River Water Management District [SJRWMD] 2016a). Stormwater regulations were adopted in unincorporated Brevard County in 1978 and adopted statewide in 1989. Due to stormwater regulations, stormwater treatment systems were constructed along with all new development exceeding size thresholds. Privately owned and operated stormwater treatment systems have prevented more than a million pounds of sediments from entering the lagoon since 1989 (SJRWMD 2016a). Stormwater treatment projects also reduce nutrient inputs to the lagoon. In addition, dredging projects have been ongoing since 1998 to remove muck from the lagoon and major tributaries, including Crane Creek, Turkey Creek, and St. Sebastian River (SJRWMD 2016a). These stormwater treatment and muck removal projects contributed to significant improvements in water quality and water clarity in the lagoon, which allowed for a great expansion of seagrass from 2000-2010. However, in the last five years, human impacts on the IRL system have been magnified. In 2011, the "superbloom" occurred, an intense algal bloom in the Mosquito Lagoon, Banana River Lagoon, and North IRL, as well as a secondary, less intense bloom in Central IRL. The extent and longevity of the bloom had a detrimental impact on seagrass. There have also been recurring brown tides; unusual mortalities of dolphins, manatees, and shorebirds; and large fish kills due to low dissolved oxygen from decomposing algae. In 2009, to improve lagoon water quality and restore seagrass, FDEP adopted total maximum daily loads (TMDLs) for total nitrogen (TN) and total phosphorus (TP) allowed to discharge to the Banana River Lagoon, North IRL, and Central IRL. The purpose of these TMDLs is to reduce nutrients that lead to algae growth, which block sunlight from seagrass and create low dissolved oxygen conditions that affect fish in the lagoon. To implement these TMDLs, FDEP adopted three basin management action plans (BMAPs) that outline responsibilities for reductions by the local stakeholders, list projects, and stipulate a timeline for implementation. The intent of the nutrient reductions is to provide water quality conditions that should result in seagrass growth in the lagoon at historical levels. Brevard County has a major responsibility in all three BMAPs along with its 16 municipalities, Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) District 5, Patrick Air Force Base (AFB), NASA — Kennedy Space Center, and agriculture. Prepared by Tetra Tech, Inc. and Closewaters, LLC 232 Save Our Indian River Lagoon Project Plan 2018 Update, April 2018 Since 2012, Brevard County has led an effort with its municipalities, FDOT District 5, and Patrick AFB to update the estimates of nutrient loadings to the lagoon. The County and its partners teamed with several consultants to develop the Spatial Watershed Iterative Loading (SWIL) model that revised the estimates of loading by source to the lagoon (refer to Section 2 for more details) . and to update the TMDLs. The loading estimates and TMDL targets referenced in this plan are from these efforts, as they are based on the most up-to-date data and analyses. Damage to the lagoon has been occurringfor decades and will require time and money to reverse. An important example is the accumulation of muck on the bottom of 10% of the IRL. This muck kills marine life and releases stored pollutants into the IRL. To address the damage to the IRL system, in 1990, Brevard County implemented a stormwater utility assessment, which established an annual assessment rate of $36 per year per equivalent residential unit (ERU) that stayed at this level until 2014. The rate increased to $52/ERU for 2014 and 2015, and increased to $64/ERU in 2016. This raised collections from $3.4 million (in 2014) to $6.0 million (projected for 2016). Of the funding raised, a portion is available for capital improvement programs or other stormwater best management practices (BMPs), and is split between water quality improvement programs and flood control and mitigation programs. In addition, funding is spent on annual program operating expenses. Operation and maintenance includes National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System permit compliance activities (street sweeping, trap and box cleaning, and aquatic weed harvesting), outfall/ditch treatments, small scale oyster restoration, as well as harvesting and replanting of floating vegetative islands. While revenues from this stormwater assessment, over the last 10 years, have funded many projects, a significant portion of projects have been partially funded by grants. When applicable, federal water quality grants provide up to 60% matching funds, state TMDL grants provide up to 50% match, and SJRWMD cost -share grants fund up to 33% of construction. All of these grant programs are highly competitive and subject to variable state and federal appropriations, as well as changing priorities. Due to funding limitations and the continuing degradation of key indicators of health in the IRL, such as seagrass and fish, Brevard County identified a need for additional funding to implement projects identified as critical to lagoon restoration. Therefore, the County placed a Save Our Indian River Lagoon '/2 cent sales tax referendum on the ballot in November 2016. This referendum passed by more than 60% of the votes and will provide a funding mechanism for the projects listed in this plan (or future annual updates) for the County and its municipalities. Revenue collection from the sales tax began in January 2017. This Save Our. Indian River Lagoon Project Plan outlines projects planned to meet updated TMDL targets and improve the health, productivity, aesthetic appeal, and economic value of the lagoon. Almost all of these projects require sales tax funding in order for these projects to be implemented. Furthermore, the local sales tax funding could be used to leverage significantly more in match funding from state and federal grant programs. The IRL ecosystem is an asset valued not only in Florida but also nationally; therefore, implementation of this plan would help to restore this national treasure. If additional funding is provided through matching funds from other sources, additional projects may be implemented, which would increase the overall plan cost, and/or project timelines may be moved up to allow the benefits of those projects to occur earlier than planned. Response of the lagoon ecosystem may lag for several years behind completion of nutrient reduction implementation; however, action must be accelerated now to ensure restoration succeeds over time. Prepared by Tetra Tech, Inc. and Closewaters, LLC 233 Save Our Indian River Lagoon Project Plan 2018 Update, April 2018 1.1. Return on Investment and Economic Value The economic value of the lagoon system was evaluated during development of this plan. It was estimated that at least a total present value of $6 billion is tied to restoration of the IRL. There is approximately $2 billion in benefits from restoration and an estimated $4 billion in damages if the IRL is not brought back to health during the next decade. If viewing this project plan purely as a financial investment that pays the $2 billion in benefits alone (i.e. not counting the avoidance of the $4 billion loss), the projected pretax internal rate of return is 10%, if the plan takes 20 years to implement. However, if the County were to bond the sales tax revenue to accelerate implementation of this plan over 5 years instead of 20 years, the return on investment rises significantly to 26% because the benefits of restoration would begin to accrue much faster. Based on the sensitivity of the rate of return to the speed of plan implementation, it would be financially responsible and beneficial for the County to borrow money at a typical 4% annual bond rate in order to accelerate implementation in order to achieve the 26% return on investment. In annualized terms, borrowing $300 million at 4% to achieve a steady 26% annual return would contribute $63 million in annual positive cash flow; making bonding an excellent investment choice. Table 1 documents projections of three economic engines likely to have significant economic impacts on Brevard County residents with positive impacts if the IRL is restored versus negative impacts if the IRL is not restored. Additional detail on each of these impacts is provided in Section 1.1.1. The upper part of the table lists the economic benefits for restoring a healthy IRL while the lower part of the table lists the economic costs of declining IRL health in the absence of restoration through plan implementation. Economic impacts in the table are expressed both as annual cash flows and as the discounted expected present value of those cash flows over a 30 -year financial plan period. Expected present value is an economic indicator used in business to express the present monetary value of a future stream of cash flows. This expected monetary value discounts the future stream by an interest rate and also discounts it further by a probability factor to account for the uncertainty of future events. Therefore, the expected present value of IRL economic benefits shown in Table 1 is much less than the sum of those future cash flows. Table 1: Economic Impact Scenarios Based Upon the Condition of the IRI Economic Benefits for Restoring a Healthy IRL Annual Cash Flow Expected Present Value Tourism and Recreation Growth $95 million $997 million Property Value Growth $81 million $852 million Rebirth of Commercial Fishing excludes indirect benefits $15 million $159 million Healthy Residents and Tourists Not quantified Not quantified Total Benefits $191 million $2.01 billion Economic Costs of Declining IRL Health Annual Cash Flow Expected Present Value Tourism and Recreation at Risk -$237 million -$3 billion Property Value at Risk -$92 million -$1.2 billion Decline of Commercial Fishing excludes indirect impacts) -$6 million -$87 million Potential Pathogen Impacts to Residents and Tourists Not quantified Not quantified Total Damages -$335 -$4.29 billion Prepared by Tetra Tech, Inc. and Closewaters, LLC 234 Save Our Indian River Lagoon Project Plan 2018 Update, April 2018 Today there is a $6 billion decision point for the IRL. Despite unprecedented algae blooms and fish kills, conditions could become worse. If large-scale fish kills continue with increasing frequency, algae blooms continue or become toxic, or there is a pathogen outbreak, then real estate, tourism, and the quality of life and health for Brevard County residents would likely suffer. 1.1.1 Areas of Economic Value at Risk Tourism and Recreation Today's tourism revenue in Brevard County comes primarily from the beaches. In order to diversify. the tourism base and increase revenue, Brevard County has developed a plan to increase ecotourism, a globally growing and high value sector of tourism that depends on restoration and maintenance of a healthy IRL. High value ecotourism relies on exceptional natural experiences including fishing, bird watching, kayaking, paddle boarding, camping, hiking, and nature tours. In the short-term, there are opportunities for tourists to participate in restoration experiences, such as collecting mangrove seeds by kayak or canoe, planting mangrove seedlings, or establishingcolonies of clams, oysters, or mussels. A successful example of Brevard County ecotourism is the world famous annual Space Coast Birding and Wildlife Festival that brings $1.2 million annually to the County and attracts approximately 5,000 visitors.. Property Value While the economic benefits of IRL restoration are likely to increase property value throughout the County, to be conservative this plan assessed the exposure only to properties with frontage on Mosquito Lagoon, IRL, Banana River Lagoon, Sykes Creek, and connected waterways. Approximately 11.2% of the County's $27 billion in taxable property value is directly on the IRL. Therefore, more than $3 billion in taxable property value is directly at risk with ongoing IRL issues, such algal blooms and fish kills. Furthermore, a weighted -average millage rate of 18.58 results in an estimated annual tax revenue of $56 million that is also at risk in the absence of IRL restoration. The $852 million of incremental expected present value assumes a 20% improvement in IRL frontage property value, which would be 90% likely after 10 years with the IRL restored. Consultants for the County surveyed the Space Coast Association of REALTORS' to assess the likely impacts of IRL health on the waterfront property value. Approximately 170 REALTORS° most familiar with the waterfront market replied to the survey. These professionals assessed that waterfront IRL property values would increase 22% on average over five years if the IRL were healthy and would decrease by 25% over five years if the lagoon were not restored. Commercial Fishing IRL restoration is critical to the recovery of a once thriving, valuable, and world-class fishery, both commercial and recreational. In 1995, the commercial fish harvest in Brevard County was $22 million annually. While a 1995 ban on commercial net fishing marked economic decline, the degradation of the lagoon system contributed considerably to a severe reduction in value of only $6.7 million annually in 2015, based on Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FWC) data (see Figure 1). These numbers do not include the many indirect benefits of a robust commercial fishing industry including fresh local fish for restaurants, employment, commerce of supplies and services for the industry, and benefits of local fresh fish for residents and visitors. Prepared by Tetra Tech, Inc. and Closewaters, LLC Save Our Indian River Lagoon Project Plan 2018 Update, April 2018 $10,000,000 $25,000,000 $20,000,000 515,000,000 Value of Commerical Fishery $10,000,000 $5,000,000 so '1,`''1.'��~O1Q~'LQ~�00 1Qti4'~'4 FWC Reporting Year for Brevard County 250,000 200,000 250,000 Fish Kill 100,000 Count s0,000 Figure 1: Decline of Commercial Fishing and Increasing Fish Kill Severity In addition, a healthy fish population is critical to the brand of any coastal community. Historically Brevard County was once home to a world-class abundance and diversity of rare and widespread species of fish, crabs, shrimp, and clams that made the IRL a global brand. That brand can be restored along with the fish and shellfish of the IRL. Healthy Residents and Tourists There are almost 82,000 permitted septic systems within Brevard County, of which nearly 59,500 septic systems pollute groundwater that migrates to the lagoon. This groundwater moves slowly toward the lagoon through soils that attenuate some but not all of these pollutants. It would cost at least $1.19 billion to convert all 59,500 septic tanks to central sewage treatment. While total conversion is cost prohibitive, this plan targets the septic systems with the highest potential impacts to the lagoon. Targeted action includes connection to the central sewer system or upgrade to advanced treatment systems that remove significantly more nutrients and pathogens than traditional septic systems. Although there are studies that have identified pathogens migrating from septic systems into waterways, it is not possible to estimate the economic impact of potential disease from these waterborne pathogens. The conversion of septic systems is expensive relative to other types of nutrient reduction projects; however, the additional health benefits associated with septic system upgrades make this option a priority beyond only the abatement of nutrients. 1.2. Maximizing Benefits and Managing Risk There is much at stake with regard to both economic outcomes and the incremental funding critical to restoration; therefore, the County chose to address the unavoidable risks inherent in a multi- year, large-scale restoration plan in a transparent and objective manner. To help ensure objectivity, the County retained outside consultants to assess risk and to estimate potential positive or negative outcomes. The approach for this plan to evaluate the different project options included using Expected Monetary Value (EMV) models; a decision science tool used in business to improve decision - Prepared by Tetra Tech, Inc. and Closewaters, LLC Save Our Indian River Lagoon Project Plan 2018 Update, April 2018 making and planning in a context of unavoidable uncertainty. EMV is a financial model of probability -weighted outcomes expressed in quantified financial terms that are comparable across multi-year planning periods. To compare outcomes, expected present value was used as a key metric. Expected present value has the benefit of valuing future financial costs and benefits in common present day terms to take into account the value of time and to facilitate comparisons of initiatives spanning long periods of time. As part of this methodology, consultants engaged Subject Matter Experts to assess the uncertainties of project scenarios. Subject Matter Experts include scientists, property value experts, tourism experts, lagoon advocates, and agency staff. Subject Matter Experts brought expertise in IRL science, nutrient reduction technologies, waterborne pathogens, and relevant law or county financial and accounting parameters needed for the EMV models. Information gathered during these assessments was used to document the key interdependence of initiatives, minimize risk, and maximize the likely return on investment. 1.2.1 Project Selection to Maximize Return on Investment Assessment of risk by Subject Matter Experts determined that the amount and speed of nutrient reductions are the two most critical factors affecting the success of restoring IRL health. Therefore, those projects with the greatest nutrient reduction benefit for the least cost are recommended for funding and, of those, the projects with the greatest benefits are planned for implementation first. Three other key criteria drove this plan: 1. Achieving sufficient nutrient abatement through a blend of options was a key success factor for restoration. 2. No one type of project alone could achieve an adequate nutrient abatement. 3. The target for nutrient reduction must be sufficient to minimize the need for recurring expensive muck removal, which is important for future cost avoidance. The plan sequences a diversity of project types, implementing the highest nutrient reduction impact early and implementing other projects concurrently in order to achieve a multi -pronged blend of total nutrient abatement as quickly as possible with minimal risk. Another important consideration for project sequencing was how quickly projects could produce significant nutrient pollution reduction. For decades, man-made nutrient pollution from fertilizers, septic systems, and stormwater runoff have been introduced at varying distances from the IRL. The soils are still saturated with those nutrients. Therefore, if all sources of nutrient pollution ended today, groundwater would continue to transport nutrients accumulated in the soil into the IRL with every rain event for decades in the future. However, soils next to the IRL will purge themselves quickly, in days or weeks. Septic system conversions near the lagoon or near drainage conduits into the lagoon are likely to produce water quality and reduced pathogen benefits in the lagoon in weeks or months whereas septic conversions more distant from waterways are not anticipated to generate lagoon benefits for several decades. Therefore, whenever possible, project selection and sequencing scheduled nutrient abatements closest to the IRL first. Undoing the damage to a unique and complex biological system as large as the IRL carries inherent risk. The County made the decision to be open and transparent about that risk. Assessing that risk diligently has allowed the County to mitigate and manage risk proactively in the development of this plan. Two subjective risk assessments were conducted by an independent consultant working with top science Subject Matter Experts most knowledgeable about the IRL. The first assessment was Prepared by Tetra Tech, Inc. and Closewaters, LLC 237 Save Our Indian River Lagoon Project Plan 2018 Update, April 2018 conducted with individual Subject Matter Experts and occurred before plan projects were defined. These experts assessed that the likelihood of a healthy fish population in the IRL would begin to rise faster after reaching a critical point of nutrient reduction. Therefore, there is a "critical mass" of nutrient reduction needed to achieve significant and sustainable IRL health benefits. The Subject Matter Experts also assessed that the likelihood of recovery would continue to improve as more nutrients are removed from the IRL and then begin to decline if too many nutrients were removed. The result of that first risk assessment reinforced the objective of reducing nutrients in the IRL as quickly as possible through the definition and sequencing of the projects in this plan. A second uncertainty assessment was conducted in a meeting at the Florida Institute of Technology with a group of water quality, toxicity, muck, fish, algae, invertebrates, and seagrass Subject Matter Experts. First, the experts were briefed about the projects proposed in this plan. The experts were then asked their subjective assessment of the likelihood of a healthy lagoon after this plan was implemented in each sub -lagoon. Sub -lagoons were assessed because the experts had commented previously that each sub -lagoon functioned differently. This group assessment indicated higher likelihoods of success than the first assessment. However, the scientists continued to voice concern about the restoration of the IRL in the absence of regulatory reform needed to prevent new development from adding more septic system and stormwater pollution to the lagoon. Therefore, updated regulations are needed as a complement to this plan to ensure timely and sustained success in restoring health to the IRL. Figure 2 represents the input from the Subject Matter Experts. More Likely it Likelihood of a Healthy Lagoon Less Likely i Critical Ir Point of Nutrient I Reduction' 1. Less o - Nutrient Reduction - 0, More Figure 2: Likelihood of a Healthy IRL as Nutrients are Removed There are other large-scale aquatic system restoration efforts that have been successful in achieving restoration. Some of these systems were damaged even more so than the IRL, but they have recovered through the implementation of extensive, multi-year, and multi -pronged restoration plans. These include the Chesapeake Bay, Cuyahoga River, Lake Erie, and Tampa Bay. These areas have reaped enormous economic and quality of life benefits as a result of dedicated investments in their restoration. Prepared by Tetra Tech, Inc. and Closewaters, LLC 238 Save Our Indian River Lagoon Project Plan 2018 Update, April 2018 Section 2. Approach The amount and distribution of nutrient loading from the sources described in Section 3 were examined to determine the key locations where nutrient reduction projects are needed and the extent of reductions required from each source to achieve the County's proposed TMDLs for each sub -lagoon. For each source, a reduction goal is set and projects are proposed to meet the goal. The estimated cost for each project is also included. Information on expected project efficiencies and project costs were gathered from data collected by the County in implementation of similar projects, as well as literature results from studies in Florida, where available, and across the country. The most cost-effective projects are selected and prioritized to maximize the nutrient reductions that can be achieved. 2.1. Plan Focus Area This plan focuses on projects implemented in three sub -lagoons in the IRL system: Banana River Lagoon, North IRL, and Central IRL. Figure 3 shows the locations of these sub -lagoons. All of the Banana River Lagoon watershed and the majority of the North IRL watershed are located within Brevard County. However, only a portion of the Central IRL watershed is located within the County. As shown in Figure 3, Central IRL Zone A is located entirely in Brevard, whereas Zone SEB straddles Brevard and Indian River Counties. For Zone SEB, the County has completed several projects in this area and SJRWMD is completing projects along the C-54 Canal and on the Wheeler property to treat the Sottile Canal. The reductions from these projects should be sufficient to meet the required reductions in the Brevard County portion of Zone SEB, as shown in Table 2. This plan includes some additional beneficial projects located in Zone SEB to help ensure that the necessary reductions are achieved throughout Brevard County; however, the majority of projects proposed in this plan for the Central IRL fall within Central IRL Zone A. Table 2: Summary of Load Reductions and Projects in Central IRL Zone SEB Category TN Load (lbs/r TP Load (lbs/yr) Stormwater and Baseflow Loading 248,233 34,901 Atmospheric Deposition Loading 22,371 404 Point Sources Loading 0 0 Total Loading 270,604 35,305 5 -month TMDL Percent Reductions 38.0% 35.0% Required Reductions 102,830 12,357 Completed County Projects 2010-Februar 2016 29,890 9,643 C-54 Project 65,974 10,558 Wheeler Property Project 36,582 21,784 Total Project Reductions 132,446 41,985 % of Required Reductions Achieved 128.8% 339.8% In addition, a small portion of the County is located within the Mosquito Lagoon. Brevard County does not have stormwater outfalls, septic systems, or point sources in this sub -lagoon. However, this plan includes a muck removal project within Mosquito Lagoon. Prepared by Tetra Tech, Inc. and Closewaters, LLC 239 Save Our Indian River Lagoon Project Plan 2018 Update, April 2018 Figure 3: Locations of the Banana River Lagoon (BRL), North IRL (NIRL), and Central IRL (CIRL) Sub -Lagoons Prepared by Tetra Tech, Inc. and Closewaters, LLC 240 Save Our Indian River Lagoon Project Plan 2018 Update, April 2018 Section 3. Pollutant Sources in the IRL Watershed Pollutant loads in the IRL watershed are generated from multiple external sources that discharge to the lagoon. Excess loads also accumulate in nutrient sinks within the lagoon, which release nutrients to the water column during certain conditions. External sources fall into the following major categories: Stormwater runoff that occurs when rainfall hits the land and cannot soak into the ground: o Urban stormwater runoff is generated by rainfall and excess irrigation on impervious areas associated with urban development. Urban runoff picks up and transports nutrient loading from fertilizers, grass clippings, and pet waste, as well as other pollutants including sediments, pesticides, oil, and grease. Stormwater ponds and baffle boxes reduce the nutrient loading in stormwater; however, proper maintenance of these systems is necessary to maintain their performance. o Agricultural stormwater runoff occurs on agricultural land and this runoff also carries nutrients from fertilizers, as well as livestock waste, pesticides, and herbicides. This source of stormwater runoff is not addressed in this plan as the County does not have jurisdiction over agricultural use. The Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services (FDACS) has an agricultural BMP program, and they work with agricultural producers to control the loading from this source. o Natural stormwater runoff comes from the natural lands in the basin. This source is not addressed by this plan as natural loading does not need be controlled. Baseflow is the groundwater flow that contributes loading to the IRL. Due to the sandy soils in the basin and excess irrigation, nutrients can soak quickly into the groundwater with little removal. This groundwater can recharge surface water in ditches, canals, tributaries, or the IRL. o Excess fertilizer that soaks into the ground past the root zones. o Septic systems, both functioning and failing, contribute nutrient loading to the groundwater. o Leaking sewer pipes located above the water table can contribute nutrient loading to the groundwater. Atmospheric deposition that falls on both the land and the lagoon itself: o Nutrients in the atmosphere fall into the basin largely during rainfall events. The sources of these nutrients are from power plants, cars, and other sources that burn fossil fuels. However, because of atmospheric conditions and weather patterns, not all of the nutrients from atmospheric deposition are generated within the watershed. Atmospheric loading is not directly addressed by this plan as air quality and air emission standards are regulated by the federal Clean Air Act and are not within the County's control. However, the stormwater projects and in -lagoon projects will treat some of the nutrient loading from atmospheric deposition that falls on the land and lagoon surface. Point sources that treat collected sewage and discharge treated effluent: o The direct WWTF discharges'to the lagoon have been largely removed, and the majority of facilities in the basin use the treated effluent for reclaimed water irrigation. However, depending on the level of treatment at the WWTF, the reclaimed water can have an excessive concentration of nutrients that may contribute loading to the baseflow. o There have been issues with inflow and infiltration into the sanitary sewer collection system. Large rain events can result in large amounts of water entering the sewer Prepared by Tetra Tech, Inc. and Closewaters, LLC 241 Save Our Indian River Lagoon Project Plan 2018 Update, April 2018 collection system, and this additional water can cause sewer overflows that contribute nutrients and bacteria to local waterbodies. In addition to these external sources of loading to the lagoon, nutrients from muck (muck flux) is an internal source of loading within the .lagoon itself. Muck is made up of organic materials from soil erosion on the land and from decay of organic matter (leaves, grass clippings, algae, and aquatic vegetation) in the lagoon. As these organic materials decay, they constantly flux nutrients into the water column above, where they add to the surplus of nutrients coming from external sources. Table 3 summarizes the estimated loading from these sources in the Banana River Lagoon, North IRL, and Zone A of the Central IRL. The stormwater runoff and baseflow/septic systems loading estimates are from the SWIL model, the point source loading estimates were based on the facility monthly operating reports and discharge monitoring reports, and the atmospheric deposition loads are from measured data at nearby stations. The muck flux load estimates are calculated based on the muck area in each portion of the lagoon and flux estimates from studies in the lagoon (refer to Section 4.2.1 for more details). The loading from these sources is also shown graphically in Figure 4, Figure 5, and Figure 6. Table 3: Loading from Different Sources in Each Sub -lagoon SWIM 70000n tray= SMAW cao,aao 1 3W M � zrlopoo 3ODAW Stormwaim Baseftow/Septic `Amtospherk Point Sources Muck flm Runoff Systems-Dcooviion loading Category 5tonnvater 8ase0ow/Scpt1C AtmoVhefk Point3wrces Muckfim Runoff Systems OcoostNon loading Category Figure 4: Banana River Lagoon TN (left) and TP (right) Annual Average Loads by. Source Prepared by Tetra Tech, Inc. and Closewaters, LLC Banana River Lagoon North IRL Central IRL Zone A Source with anals c TN (lbs/r TP (lbs/r TN Jbs/ r TP (lbs/r TN ,Ibsl r TP (lbs/yr) Stormwater Runoff 119,923 15,064 328,047 45,423 279,351 43,193 Baseflow/Septic 164,225 22,613 344,112 47,383 370,130 50,966 Systems Atmospheric 175,388 3,222 3011977 5,505 49,456 892 Deposition Point Sources 17,484 3,370 14,711 1,029 0 0 Muck flux 705,561 106,771 478,824 71,824 42,500 6,250 SWIM 70000n tray= SMAW cao,aao 1 3W M � zrlopoo 3ODAW Stormwaim Baseftow/Septic `Amtospherk Point Sources Muck flm Runoff Systems-Dcooviion loading Category 5tonnvater 8ase0ow/Scpt1C AtmoVhefk Point3wrces Muckfim Runoff Systems OcoostNon loading Category Figure 4: Banana River Lagoon TN (left) and TP (right) Annual Average Loads by. Source Prepared by Tetra Tech, Inc. and Closewaters, LLC Save Our Indian River Lagoon Project Plan 2018 Update, April 2018 ii r 20.000 500.000 „ f i 80000- ^ i I n400,000 . _ .__. ___.., _-- ------'---- -..- ------- - - ° n 50.000- i, v Z 200.000 20,000 Io0,000 -. .-._.. r. 10.000 stormwater BaseiiowlSeptic Atmospheric Point Soun- Muck 6. Stom ater Bas-flow/Septic Atmospheric Point Sources Muck flux Runoff syg— Deposition 6 Runoff systems (IP-p0'Aion Loading Category loading Category — - Figure 5: North IRL TN left- and TP(right)--- –Average--- d - g ( ) Annual Loads by Source ' 400.000 .. _...__..,:.-.----.:.---... _ _ ._ . ..--..----- 80.000 ._. .....--- -- -- --- __ "-• -_ - -'-- --- 3,000 - - - - - - -- --- - – -- - 30D,000 - - - � a c 200.000 v -__ _. _-. __-. __. _. _ _: ___._ _. _ __�. _,.___.._'., c 30,000 es 150,000 s 20.000 Stomiwater Rasef ew Seotic lumosphesk point Souttes Myck 11. i Stotn)Water 84,501 mrjseptlC Atmospheric Paint Sources Mt.* Na R-4 systems 0eposition Runoff systems 0e"fon Loading Category - loading Categmy Figure 6: Central IRL TN (left) and TP (right) Annual Average Loads by Source Section 4 includes information on projects to reduce the loading from urban stormwater runoff (including fertilizers and grass clippings), reclaimed water from WWTFs, and septic systems; to remove the internal cycling of loads accumulated in the muck rdeposits; and to restore natural filtration processes. Prepared by Tetra Tech, Inc. and Closewaters, LLC 243 Save Our Indian River Lagoon Project Plan 2018 Update, April 2018 Section 4. Project Options In order to restore the lagoon's balance, Brevard County has been implementing a multi -pronged approach to Reduce pollutant and nutrient inputs to lagoon, Remove the accumulation of muck from the lagoon bottom, and Restore water -filtering oysters and related lagoon ecosystem services. This plan also recommends funding for project monitoring, needed for accountability and to Respond to changing conditions and opportunities. Response funds will be used to track progress, measure cost effectiveness, and report on performance. Each year, a Citizen Oversight Committee (additional details are included in Section 4.4.1) will review monitoring reports and make recommendations to the Brevard County Board of County Commissioners to redirect remaining plan funds to those efforts that will be most successful and cost-effective. Although research is important to better understand factors that significantly impact the health, productivity, and natural resilience of the IRL, funding for research is not included in this project plan. Several goals were set to help select the projects for this plan. The goal for the Reduce projects is to achieve the proposed five-month TMDL for each sub -lagoon (refer to Section 5 for additional details on the TMDLs). The goal for the Remove projects is to achieve at least a 25% reduction in estimated recycling of internal loads. The goals for the Restore projects are to filter the entire volume of the lagoon annually and to reduce shoreline erosion. The most cost-effective projects in each category were selected to maximize nutrient reductions, minimize lag time in lagoon response, reduce risk, and optimize the return on investment. Section 4.1 through Section 4.4 provide information on the proposed projects, estimated nutrient reduction benefits, and costs, as well as the ongoing research needed to measure and assess the project efficiencies and benefits to the lagoon system. 4.1. Projects to Reduce Pollutants An important step in restoring the lagoon system is reducing the amount of pollutants that enter the IRL through stormwater runoff and groundwater. Reduction efforts include source control (such as fertilizer reductions) to reduce the amount of pollutants generated, as well as treatment to reduce pollutants that have already been discharged before they are washed off in stormwater runoff or enter the groundwater system and ultimately discharge to the IRL. Monitoring of these projects will be performed to verify the estimated effectiveness of each project type implemented (refer to Section 4.4). The benefits from fertilizer management and public education, WWTF upgrades for reclaimed water, and stormwater treatment are seen fairly quickly in the lagoon system. Public education about fertilizer and other sources of pollution addresses nutrients at their source and prevents these nutrients from entering the system. WWTF upgrades result in reduced nutrients in the treated effluent, which is then used throughout the basin for reclaimed water irrigation. The stormwater projects will capture and treat runoff, which is currently untreated or inadequately treated, before it reaches the lagoon. While greatly beneficial, septic system removal or upgrade projects may take longer to result in a nutrient reduction to the lagoon. The septic systems in key areas must be removed or upgraded in order to see the full benefits. In addition, septic systems contribute nutrient loading to the lagoon through groundwater, and the travel time of the nutrient plumes through the groundwater to a waterbody vary throughout the basin depending on watershed conditions. Prepared by Tetra Tech, Inc. and Closewaters, LLC Save Our Indian River Lagoon Project Plan 2018 Update, April 2018 The following subsections summarize the fertilizer management and public education, septic system removal and upgrades, WWTF upgrades for reclaimed water, and stormwater treatment projects that will be implemented to reduce nutrient loads to the IRL. 4.1.1 Public Outreach and Education Fertilizer Management It is a common practice to apply fertilizer on urban and - agricultural land uses. However, excessive and Approximately 81,700 lbs/yr of inappropriately applied fertilizer pollutes surrounding TN and 4,200 lbs/yr of TP enter waters and stormwater. FDACS compiles information the lagoon watershed from fta on the fertilizer sales by county, as well as the excess fertilizer application. estimated nutrients from those fertilizers. It is important to note that all fertilizer sold in a county may not be applied within that county because a portion of that fertilizer may be transported to another county. However, details on the amount of fertilizer transported between counties is not tracked. Therefore, the information in the FDACS reports is simply the best estimate of the amount of fertilizer used, and the associated nutrient content, in a county. Table 4 and Figure 7 summarize the nutrients in the lawn fertilizer sold in Brevard County, according to FDACS records. This information was organized by fiscal year. The figure shows a decrease in the amount of nitrogen and phosphorus fertilizer being sold in the County after the fertilizer ordinance was adopted in 2013. Table 4: Nutrients in Lawn Fertilizer Sold in Brevard County by Fiscal Year Fiscal Year Lawn Fertilizer Nitrogen tons/ r Lawn Fertilizer Nitrogen (lbs/r Lawn Fertilizer Phosphorus yr) Lawn Fertilizer Phosphorus (lbs/yr) 2012-2013 1,673 3,346,140 —(tons/ 61 122,740 2013-2014 319 637,700 63 126,400 2014-2015 204 408,220 16 32,520 4,000,000 3,500,000 3,000,000 0 2,500,000 I _ 2,000,000 fo– 1,500,000 1,000,000 500,000 0 _.... FY 12-13 FY 13-14 FY 14-15 Fiscal Year (October 1 -September 30) ■ Lawn Fertilizer Nitrogen (lbs) ■ Lawn Fertilizer Phosphorus (lbs) Figure 7: TN and TP in Lawn Fertilizer Sold in Brevard County by Fiscal Year To help address fertilizer as a source of nutrient loading, local governments located within the watershed of a waterbody or water segment that is listed as impaired by nutrients are required to Prepared by Tetra Tech, Inc. and Closewaters, LLC Save Our Indian River Lagoon Project Plan 2018 Update, April 2018 adopt, at a minimum, FDEP's Model Ordinance for Florida -Friendly Fertilizer Use on Urban Landscapes (Section 403.067, Florida Statutes). Brevard County and its municipalities adopted fertilizer ordinances that included the required items from the Model Ordinance in December 2012, as well as additional provisions in 2013 and 2014. The County's fertilizer ordinance is found in Chapter 46, Article VIII, Section 46-335 through Section 46-349. This ordinance "regulates and promotes the proper use of fertilizers by any applicator; requires proper training of commercial and institutional fertilizer applicators; establishes training and licensing requirements; establishes a prohibited application period; specifies allowable fertilizer application rates and methods; fertilizer -free zones; low maintenance zones; and exemptions. The Ordinance requires the use of best management practices which provide specific management guidelines to minimize negative secondary and cumulative environmental effects associated with the misuse of fertilizers." The County's ordinance prohibits the application of fertilizer that contains nitrogen and/or phosphorus during the period of June 1 through September 30, as well as when heavy rain is likely (including a watch or warning for a flood, tropical storm, or hurricane). Fertilizer application is also prohibited within 15 feet of any surface waterbodies, to limit the likelihood that fertilizer will run off into a waterbody. Fertilizer applied within the County must not contain phosphorus, unless a soil or plant tissue test indicates a need. Fertilizer with nitrogen should contain at least 50% in the form of slow release, controlled release, timed release, slowly available, or water insoluble nitrogen. When applying fertilizer, the ordinance requires deflectors on broadcast spreaders and removal of any fertilizer spilled on an impervious surface, which can then runoff into the stormwater system. The ordinance also requires grass and vegetation clippings not to be swept, washed, or blown off into surface waterbodies or the stormwater system. Commercial applicators, must complete a training program and carry evidence that they have completed the training. The ordinance only applies to use of urban fertilizer, and not fertilizer applied to a bona fide farm operation. In addition to the fertilizer ordinance, Brevard County, nine municipalities, Good Education Solutions, and the Brevard Zoo created a public education campaign called "Blue Life" in 2012. The purpose of this campaign is to provide information to the public about sources of pollution and what actions people can take to protect and improve water quality. The campaign is a combination of public service announcements; TV, radio, and billboard advertisements; social media; community forums and talks; workshops; school programs; and other printed informational materials. The information includes details on fertilizer and pesticide use and management, proper lawn and garden maintenance, pet waste management, proper car washing and maintenance, waste management, and litter control. To determine the effectiveness of this educational campaign on behavior changes, the County contracted with Praecipio Economics Finance Statistics (PEFS) to conduct a survey before the campaign implementation in 2012 and after the campaign was in place for two years in 2015. A similar survey was used in both 2012 and 2015, although the 2015 survey included additional questions about the Blue Life campaign, fertilizer bans, and state of the IRL. The survey was mailed to about 50,000 households who receive water from the City of Melbourne utility. A total of 1,470 usable surveys were obtained for 2012 and 1,572 usable surveys were obtained for 2015. The results were tabulated and analyzed to compare the pre- versus post -Blue Life campaign responses (PEFS 2016). When comparing the results from the 2012 and 2015 surveys, PEFS (2016) found that the study unambiguously showed that people in 2015 were better informed about stormwater issues than in 2012, and that behavior that affects water quality in the area has, in general, improved: Prepared by Tetra Tech, Inc. and Closewaters, LLC Save Our Indian River Lagoon Project Plan 2018 Update, April 2018 The 2015 population received more information about stormwater runoff and were better informed about stormwater runoff issues. The proportion of respondents who received "a lot" or "some" information about stormwater runoff issues increased by 6% and 19%, respectively. Perceptions about water quality became much more negative, increasing by 10% for "very poor" and 18% for "poor." Lawn and garden fertilizer was identified as the single biggest source of water pollution by 7.6% more respondents. Significant improvements in behavioral traits associated with lawn maintenance (lawn clippings, fertilizer application, pesticide application, frequency of fertilizer applications, and fertilizer types) occurred between 2012 and 2015. The percentage of people who leave the lawn clippings on their grass after it is mowed rose by 3.5% (from 77% in 2012). The percentage of people who report that they do not apply fertilizer and/or pesticides increased by 6.4% and 6.5%. Of those who do fertilize their lawns, the proportion who fertilize their lawn once or twice a year rose by 5.3%. Persons who used desirable fertilizer types (no phosphorus, slow release, and/or dry/granulated fertilizer) rose by 7.6%. Significant improvements in where a vehicle is washed and the pickup of dog waste occurred between 2012 and 2015. There was a 5.1 % increase in the proportion of people who take their vehicle to a commercial car wash (instead of washing their car at home) and a 5.9% increase in the proportion of people who "always" pick up their dog's waste. PEFS (2016) also included an evaluation of the 2015 survey results for those people who were exposed to the Blue Life campaign versus those who had not seen campaign materials. The people who were exposed to the Blue Life campaign were more familiar with the environmental problems of the IRL and were knowledgeable about the fertilizer ordinances: . People in the Blue Life subgroup reported greater familiarity with the pollution problems in the IRL (17.4% higher) and recently enacted fertilizer ordinances (11.6% higher) than persons in the non -Blue Life subgroup. About 25% of the 2015 sample population remembered being exposed to Blue Life promotional materials, with water bill inserts and farmer's market outreach representing the two largest pathways. The results of the surveys show that the Blue Life campaign, as well as other educational efforts in the County, had a beneficial impact on people's behaviors and knowledge of the IRL problems. Continuation of this campaign, or other similar public education and outreach efforts, would have a benefit in reducing sources of the pollution to the lagoon (fertilizers, pesticides, pet waste, oil and grease from cars). The County, city, and grant funding spent on the Blue Life campaign is summarized in Table 5. This funding helped contribute to the results seen in the survey. Table 5: Brevard County Funding for the Blue Life Campaign by Fiscal Year (FY) FY October 1 — September 30 Costs 2012-2013 $83,124 2013-2014 $112812 2014-2015 $182,482 Total $378,418 The Blue Life campaign is continuing its education and outreach efforts including digital billboards (see Figure 8), radio advertisements, Florida Today sticky note (see Figure 9), and water bill insert for the City of Cocoa and City of Melbourne customers. Prepared by Tetra Tech, Inc. and Closewaters, LLC Save Our Indian River Lagoon Project Plan 2018 Update, April 2018 Figure 8: New Blue Life Digital Billboard _iPS- �N. BLUE] BLUE,LIFE F L O R I R A Y_:.317 OYF L O R I D A OUR WATERS OUR FUTURE 0R WATFR9 OUR FUTURE Commit to the summer ban SAVE OUR NO phosphorus, NO nitrogen LAGOON! fertilizers June 1 to Sept. 30. Help bring our Lagoon back to Blue by reducing the harmful runoff that rr�T�` rr UFE flows into our waterways. 130UE TAKE ACTION NOW! - Learn How at BlueLifeFL.org. Figure 9: Florida Today Sticky Note The University of Florida (UF) Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences (IFAS) Extension Office in Brevard County also implements programs and activities that focus on proper fertilizer application and water quality/conservations measures. The anticipated outcomes of these programs are that participants will gain knowledge, and most importantly, will adopt practices that result in behavior change. Two horticultural faculty plan, implement, and evaluate the Florida Friendly LandscapingTM program, which includes the following: My Brevard Yard — This is a hands-on program delivered through classroom training and/or one-on-one onsite consultations. In the classroom training, participants learn about their local fertilizer ordinance, how their lawn practices impact the IRL, and how to implement fertilizer and irrigation BMPs for turfgrass management. The site consultations involve a trained Master Gardener volunteer or Extension faculty visit to the participants' home to conduct an analysis of the lawn. Turf issues are addressed, problem areas are identified and solutions are offered. Fertilizer spreaders are calibrated and fertilizer recommendations are made after the soil test results are received. If the homeowner uses a landscape service, the faculty member will work with the landscaper to develop a fertilizer program that meets the fertilizer ordinance requirements and follows BMPs. Master Gardener Volunteer Program — Master Gardeners are OF -IFAS Extension trained volunteers who educate participants about Florida Friendly LandscapingTM principles. Prepared by Tetra Tech, Inc. and Closewaters, LLC 240 Save Our Indian River Lagoon Project Plan 2018 Update, April 2018 Master Gardeners deliver educational programs, My Brevard Yard program site consultations, exhibits at events and festivals, and by speaking to community groups. Brevard Botanical Garden —A five -acre garden is being developed on the Extension campus. The garden will be an outdoor, hands-on laboratory for educating homeowners, green industry professionals, government employees, Master Gardeners, and youth. OF -IFAS Space Coast Golf and Turf Association Workshops — This program is targeted to golf course superintendents and turfgrass managers, especially athletic field managers. The commercial horticulture faculty member collaborates with OF scientists to provide the latest research on turf management such as weed management, fertilizer, and irrigation. Landscape Management Program — Green industry professionals and government employees are the primary target audiences for this program. The program provides the state mandated Green Industry BMP Certification training, pesticide license exam preparation, and pesticide applicators' continuing education units. Many of the program participants are contracted with homeowner associations throughout the county, so their practices usually impact a significant amount of square footage. Homeowner Association and Property Manager Education Program —This program began in 2016. The target audience is property managers, realtors, homeowner/condominium association boards, and developers. This program educates the participants about BMPs for lawns and ponds. Retail Garden Center Employee Education — This program began in 2016. The target audience for this program is retail garden center employees and managers. Employees typically lack the training needed to make decisions that positively impact water quality, and they are often unfamiliar with fertilizer ordinances. Participants in this program will learn the basics of fertilizers and ordinances, and will be given resources to share with their customers that will help them make good decisions. This will be part of the upcoming fertilizer education focus, as described in the section below. OF -IFAS also provides education to the agriculture industry including the following: Urban and Sustainable Agricultural Production — The 2012 Agriculture Census reported more than 500 small farms in Brevard County. This program works with small farms to educate producers on water quality BMPs, technical production assistance, and pesticide management. Livestock and Pasture Management — This program works with livestock operations on BMPs and technical expertise. Participants learn how to manage pastures and horse manure to reduce runoff pollution, as well as backyard chicken education. OF -IFAS participates in programs through the Florida Sea Grant: Oyster Gardening — OF -IFAS partners with Brevard County Natural Resources and the Brevard Zoo to implement the oyster gardening program (Section 4.3.1 has more details). Microplastic Awareness — This is a new program that raises participants' awareness of microplastic pollution in waterbodies. Citizens learn how to collect samples and filter the Prepared by Tetra Tech, Inc. and Closewaters, LLC Save Our Indian River Lagoon Project Plan 2018 Update, April 2018 water to view the microplastics. The goal is help citizens make better choices when selecting health and beauty products to reduce microplastic pollution. Florida Master Naturalist Program — This program is a collection of modules that educate participants about natural resources and the environment. After completing all of the modules, participants are awarded a certificate from UF. Once certified, participants are encouraged to become involved in the Space Coast Chapter of Florida Master Naturalist, which provides outreach and educational programs to Brevard County residents. Ecotourism Certification (new program in 2016) — OF -IFAS partnered with the Tourism Development Office and Parks and Recreation to provide a certification program for ecotourism organizations. Through this certification, participants will learn about their impact on waterways, as well as how to educate their customers about the County's natural resources, protecting water quality, and reducing their environmental footprint. In addition, there are several community development programs: Sustainable Floridianssm Program — This 10 -week program teaches participants about conserving energy and water, climate change science, local food systems, recycling, and transportation issues. The IRL is a major focus of the program. Brevard Water Summit — The summit was a collaborative effort between Brevard County Natural Resources, Marine Resources Council, and City of Melbourne. The target audience is elected officials, decision makers, and community leaders. Participants learned from local and OF experts about Brevard County -specific water issues such as water supply, water quality, agricultural water, wastewater, and low impact development. Based on the FDACS information, the lawn fertilizer sold in Brevard County in FY2014-2015 contained 408,220 lbs of nitrogen and 32,520 lbs of phosphorus. The fertilizer applied is attenuated through several naturally occurring physical, chemical, and biological processes including uptake by grass. The environmental attenuation/uptake for urban fertilizer is 80% for nitrogen (FDEP 2014b) and 90% for phosphorus. The estimated nitrogen and phosphorus that is applied but is not naturally attenuated is shown in Table 6. It is important to note that not all the un -attenuated nutrients will migrate to the lagoon, either through runoff or baseflow (groundwater that enters ditches, canals, and tributaries), but these numbers provide an idea of the excess nutrients that could be reduced as a result of public education and changes in fertilizer use. Table 6: Estimated TN and TP Not Attenuated in FY2014-2015 Lbs Sold Environmental FY2014-15 lbs Parameter FY2014-15 Attenuation (%) (Lawn Only) after Lawn Only) Attenuation TN 408,220 80% 81,644 TP 32,520 90% 3,252 When recent sales data are compared to the fertilizer sold in FY2013-2014, which is before adoption of the more protective amendments to the ordinance, significant reductions are observed. These reductions from the implementation of the ordinance are shown in Table 7. Prepared by Tetra Tech, Inc. and Closewaters, LLC Save Our Indian River Lagoon Project Plan 2018 Update, April 2018 Table 7: Reductions from Fertilizer Ordinance Compliance to Date FY2013-14 lbs (Lawn FY2014-15 lbs (Lawn Reductions from Only) after Attenuation: Only) after Attenuation: Ordinance to Date Parameter Pre -Ordinance Post -Ordinance (lbs/yr) TN 127,540 81,644 45,896 TP 12,640 3,252 9,388 Based on studies by UF, approximately 0.03% of applied nitrogen ends up in runoff during establishment of sodded bermudagrass on a 10% slope. Nitrogen leaching ranged from 8% to 12% of the amount applied (Trenholm and Sartain 2010). Therefore, nitrogen leaching from fertilizer into the groundwater is 300 to 400 times as much as the nitrogen running off in stormwater. To help address the leaching issue, the Brevard County fertilizer ordinance encourages the use of slow release nitrogen fertilizer. Slow release fertilizer decreases nitrogen leaching by about 30% (UF -IFAS 2012). In addition, the ordinance requires that fertilizer with zero phosphorus is used. The public education and outreach campaign will be expanded to include focus on slow release and zero phosphorus fertilizers. An important component of this will be to reach out to stores within the County to ensure they are making slow release and zero phosphorus fertilizers more visible and to add signage to let buyers know which fertilizers are compliant with all local ordinances. This would cost approximately $125,000 per year for a period of five years. If an additional 25% of fertilizer users switch to 50% slow release nitrogen and zero phosphorus formulations, compliant with the ordinance, this would result in a reduction of 6,123.3 lbs/yr of TN and 813.0 lbs/yr of TP (see Table 8). Table 8: Estimated TN and TP Reductions and Costs from Additional Fertilizer Ordinance Compliance Note: The projects highlighted in green are the most cost-effective and are recommended as part of this plan. In 2018, the Citizen Oversight Committee recommended extending the fertilizer education and outreach beyond the original plan recommendation of five years to all ten years of the plan. The $625,000 for this project will be redistributed as follows: (1) $125,000 in Year 1 to create the education campaign and begin implementation, (2) $50,000 per year to continue implementation in Years 2-10, and (3) an additional $50,000 in Year 6 (for a total of $100,000 in this year) to evaluate program success and update the outreach materials, as needed. Grass Clippings (added in 2018) The Brevard County fertilizer ordinance includes a paragraph concerning the management of grass clippings: "In no case shall grass clippings, vegetative material, and/or vegetative debris be washed, swept, or blown off into surface waters, stormwater drains, ditches, conveyances, watercourses, water bodies, wetlands, sidewalks or roadways. Any material that is accidentally so deposited shall be immediately removed to the maximum extent practicable" (Brevard County Section 46-343. Management of grass clippings and vegetative matter). Most municipalities have the exact or nearly similar wording for their local ordinances (Cape Canaveral, Cocoa, Cocoa Beach, Grant-Valkaria, Indian Harbour Beach, Malabar, Melbourne, Palm Bay, Palm Shores, Prepared by Tetra Tech, Inc. and Closewaters, LLC 25b FY2014- TN Reductions TP -15 TP Reductions 155 lbs (Lawn from Cost/lb/yr Obs (Lawn s (Law from Additional Cost/lb/yr Cost Only) after Additional 25% of TN Only) after 25% of TP Attenuation Compliance Removed Attenuation Compliance Removed lbs/ r Ibs/ r $625,000 81,644 6,123 $102 3,252 813 $769 Note: The projects highlighted in green are the most cost-effective and are recommended as part of this plan. In 2018, the Citizen Oversight Committee recommended extending the fertilizer education and outreach beyond the original plan recommendation of five years to all ten years of the plan. The $625,000 for this project will be redistributed as follows: (1) $125,000 in Year 1 to create the education campaign and begin implementation, (2) $50,000 per year to continue implementation in Years 2-10, and (3) an additional $50,000 in Year 6 (for a total of $100,000 in this year) to evaluate program success and update the outreach materials, as needed. Grass Clippings (added in 2018) The Brevard County fertilizer ordinance includes a paragraph concerning the management of grass clippings: "In no case shall grass clippings, vegetative material, and/or vegetative debris be washed, swept, or blown off into surface waters, stormwater drains, ditches, conveyances, watercourses, water bodies, wetlands, sidewalks or roadways. Any material that is accidentally so deposited shall be immediately removed to the maximum extent practicable" (Brevard County Section 46-343. Management of grass clippings and vegetative matter). Most municipalities have the exact or nearly similar wording for their local ordinances (Cape Canaveral, Cocoa, Cocoa Beach, Grant-Valkaria, Indian Harbour Beach, Malabar, Melbourne, Palm Bay, Palm Shores, Prepared by Tetra Tech, Inc. and Closewaters, LLC 25b Save Our Indian River Lagoon Project Plan 2018 Update, April 2018 Rockledge, Titusville, and West Melbourne). A few municipalities have altered the language slightly, including Indialantic, Melbourne Beach, and Satellite Beach. The enforcement language for all local jurisdictions in Brevard County is identical: "Whenever in this Code any act is prohibited or is made or declared to be unlawful or an offense, or whenever the doing of any act is required or the failure to do any act is declared to be unlawful, where no specific penalty is provided therefor, the violation of any such provision of this Code shall be punished by a fine not exceeding $500.00 or imprisonment for a term not exceeding 60 days, or by both such fine and imprisonment. Each day a violation of any provision of this Code shall continue shall constitute a separate offense, and each act in violation of the provisions of this Code shall be considered a separate and distinct offense." Current enforcement efforts are mostly reactive and educational. However, there are good examples in the state that can be followed by Brevard County to improve compliance with the grass clippings portion of the fertilizer ordinance. The Green Industries -BMP Course is a science -based educational program developed by UF - IFAS, FDEP, and industry representatives for green industry workers. This program teaches environmentally safe landscaping practices and is required for professionals to obtain and maintain a Commercial Fertilizer Applicator license in the State of Florida. The BMPs are wide in scope and cover the importance of removing grass clippings from hard surfaces; however, management of yard waste and grass clippings is included as a small lesson in the program. The lesson includes pictures and the statement: "Clippings contain nutrients and should be recycled on the lawn. The nutrients in clippings are pollutants when they end up in stormwater systems and waterbodies (FDEP, 2010)." Another principle that is taught in the course is "Right Plant, Right Place," which recommends replacing grass with plants and mulch in areas where grass may be inappropriate. Highway medians are an example of where grass poses safety challenges associated with preventing grass clippings from being left in the pavement. Another example is the Alachua County Public Outreach program, which includes radio spots, videos, posters, yard signs, and vehicle magnets. Alachua County has partnered with OF -IFAS staff to present their campaign during the Green Industries -BMP Course. Alachua County attempted to estimate an increase in ordinance compliance due to their campaign by through phone surveys conducted before and after the first year of the campaign. The phone surveys showed an increase in the awareness of grass clippings as pollution from 24% to 69% of respondents. The Alachua County program cost $40,000 for the initial setup with a recurring annual cost of $20,000. Grass clippings contain nutrients and those nutrients are released in stormwater or the lagoon as they decompose (Brevard County 2017). St. Augustine grass contains 2.5% nitrogen and 0.2- 0.5% (average of 0.5%) phosphorus and Bahia grass contains 2% nitrogen (UF -IFAS 2015). According to Okaloosa County Extension, a 7,500 -square foot lawn produces about 3,000 pounds of clippings per year. Unfortunately, the percentage of those total clippings that end up in stormwater is not known. To estimate the potential nutrient reduction impact of a grass clippings campaign, it was assumed that the average home size is 10,000 square feet with a 100 -foot by 100 -foot boundary, 2,500 square feet of built space, and 7,500 square feet of lawn. OF -IFAS has estimated that 3,000 pounds of grass clippings are produced annually from a healthy lawn of this size. It was assumed that most of the grass clippings in Brevard County are from St. Augustine grass, which means that 3,000 pounds of clippings contains approximately 75 lbs of TN and 10.5 lbs of TP. It was also Prepared by Tetra Tech, Inc. and Closewaters, LLC 252 Save Our Indian River Lagoon Project Plan 2018 Update, April 2018 assumed that the standard mower size is two feet wide. From one roadside pass along 100 feet of the average lawn with a two -foot wide mower, 200 square feet or 2.6% of the total lawn clippings could be cast into the road. This equals 0.02 lbs of TN and 0.0027 lbs of TP per foot per year left in the road. With about 3,800 miles of roads in the IRL Basin within Brevard County, of which approximately 1,250 miles are paved with curb and gutter and are most likely to allow the ready transport of grass clippings to the lagoon in stormwater, the potential nutrient release from those grass clippings could be up to 260,000 lbs/yr of TN and 35,640 lbs/yr of TP from mowing along both sides of the road. If Brevard County expects a similar rate of.awareness as Alachua County (24%), then a potential 200,000 lbs/yr of TN and 27,000 lbs/yr of TP may be entering the stormwater. If a successful grass clippings campaign in Brevard County can capture an increase of awareness similar to Alachua County (from 24% to 69%), then there is a potential reduction of 88,920 lbs/yr of TN and 12,189 lbs/yr of TP. In addition, assuming the environmental attenuation/uptake for grass clippings is similar to the urban fertilizer uptake of 80% for nitrogen and 90% for phosphorus, the estimated reductions would be 17,800 lbs/yr of TN and 1,200 lbs/yr of TP. This estimate assumes a simplified worst-case scenario in which everyone leaves a portion of their clippings in the road; however, it does not take into account the number of driveways, sidewalks, medians, and other impervious surfaces that grass clippings could be falling or the grass clippings being directly cast into the IRL, canals, and other waterways. Using the available information, this provides an order of magnitude estimate of the potential benefits of a grass clippings campaign for the IRL. The Marine Resources Council has proposed a partnership between the IRL Basin counties to pursue a grass clippings campaign similar to the Alachua County campaign. The Citizen Oversight Committee recommended contributing $20,000 in Year 1 of the plan towards the research and marketing to develop the campaign. This will be followed by an annual investment of $20,000 per year for Years 2 through 10 for media and promotional materials targeting Brevard County. Therefore, the total project cost is $200,000. Table 9 summarizes the costs and benefits of implementing the grass clippings campaign. Table 9: Estimated TN and TP Reductions and Costs from Grass Clippings Cam aign Cost Estimated TN Costllb/yr of Estimated TP Cost/lb/yr of Reductions (lbs/r TN Removed Reductions (lbs/r TP Removed $200,000 17,800 $11 1,200 $167 Note: The projects highlighted in green are the most cost-effective and are recommended as part of this plan. Excess Irrigation (added in 2018) Current scientific consensus attributes most nitrogen leaching to quick release fertilizer applied to unhealthy and poorly managed sod. Nutrients are more susceptible to leaching if turfgrass is overwatered, as these nutrients need to inhabit the upper few inches of soil to be available to the turf roots. During excess watering, soluble nutrients, such as highly mobile nitrate, wash through the soil from the root zone too quickly. Excess irrigation is easy to accomplish in Florida's sandy soils as these soils typically hold no more than 0.75 inches of water per foot of soil depth (Hochmuth et al. 2016). This excess irrigation is part of the baseflow contributing nutrient loading to the IRL. A survey of water users in south Florida found that 85% of homeowners have their own irrigation system and 50% reported that they follow water restrictions (Odera et al. 2015). OF identifies several factors that contribute to improper residential irrigation: Prepared by Tetra Tech, Inc. and Closewaters, LLC 253 Save Our Indian River Lagoon Project Plan 2018 Update, April 2018 Lack of understanding about urban soils. No familiarity with the different water requirements of landscape plants, including the water required during plant establishment and the water needs based on species, season, soil type, shade in the landscape, etc. Lack of attention to proper design, maintenance, and management of the irrigation system. For St. Augustine turfgrass in Brevard County, OF -IFAS recommends 2 — 5 lbs of nitrogen/1,000 ft2/year. FDACS rules allow for 2 lbs of nitrogen/1,000 ft2 per application in summer and spring and 1 Ib of nitrogen/1,000 ft2, with no more than 0.7 lbs of nitrogen/1,000 ft2 of quick release soluble nitrogen per application. Local city and county ordinances along the IRL ban the application of nitrogen during the wet season (June — September) to reduce the risk that fertilizer will be washed off or leached through turf by frequent heavy rainfall events. Established St. Augustine turfgrass maintained at OF recommendations has typical nitrogen leaching of 1 %. Other grass species and landscaping types can have far higher rates of leaching. A few studies have measured increased leaching with excessive irrigation. Overwatered bermudagrass resulted in an 8-12% nitrogen loss through leaching (Trenholm & Sartain, 2010). A study in sandy loam soil of Rhode Island measured a five -fold increase in soluble nitrogen leaching due to overwatering. In that study, the overwatered turf leached 13% of applied nitrogen, whereas the turf watered on an as -needed basis leached 2% of applied nitrogen (Morton et. al. 1988). From June 2015 to May 2016, 470,737 lbs of TN in fertilizer were sold within Brevard County. FDACS Urban Turf Fertilizer Rule (RE -1.003[2], Florida Administrative Code) does not specify a percentage of slow -released nitrogen in fertilizer or separately track slow-release nitrogen from all nitrogen sources. However, if it is assumed that 50% of fertilizer was soluble nitrogen (compliant with local fertilizer ordinances), then the total soluble nitrogen sold in Brevard County could be as high as 235,368 lbs/yr. If 13% of soluble nitrogen were leached, up to 30,597 lbs/yr of TN could potentially be entering the groundwater. If like South Florida survey respondents 50% of irrigation users in Brevard County are not over -irrigating, and if an outreach campaign can impact half of those who do over -irrigate, fertilizer leaching could be reduced by 7,649 lbs/yr of TN. As noted above, the environmental attenuation/uptake for urban fertilizer is 80% for nitrogen (FDEP 2014b). Therefore, the total amount of TN that could be reduced by reducing excess irrigation is 1,530 lbs/yr. Conducting an outreach campaign with an initial $50,000 social marketing research and development investment and $25,000 in annual implementation, the total 10 -year budget would be $300,000. This results in an average of $196/lb of TN reduced per year (see Table 10). Table 10: Estimated TN Reductions and Costs from Reducing Excess Irrigation Note: The projects highlighted in green are the most cost-effective and are recommended as part of this plan. Stormwater Pond Maintenance (added in 2018) Wet detention ponds, or stormwater ponds, are one method used to remove nutrients from stormwater as part of stormwater management mandated by Florida Statute 403.0891. These areas often have one or more stormwater pipes that drain into the pond with a smaller diameter outflow to increase retention/detention time of water in the pond. The retention time increases Prepared by Tetra Tech, Inc. and Closewaters, LLC Estimated TN Cost/lb/yr of Cost Reductions (lbs/r TN Removed $300,000 1,530 $196 Note: The projects highlighted in green are the most cost-effective and are recommended as part of this plan. Stormwater Pond Maintenance (added in 2018) Wet detention ponds, or stormwater ponds, are one method used to remove nutrients from stormwater as part of stormwater management mandated by Florida Statute 403.0891. These areas often have one or more stormwater pipes that drain into the pond with a smaller diameter outflow to increase retention/detention time of water in the pond. The retention time increases Prepared by Tetra Tech, Inc. and Closewaters, LLC Save Our Indian River Lagoon Project Plan 2018 Update, April 2018 removal of accumulated nutrients by allowing material to settle and be absorbed. By itself, an optimally sized and properly maintained stormwater pond typically has a 35-40% removal of nitrogen through settling (FDEP and WMDs 2010). Additional behaviors and technologies can be combined with ponds to increase removal rates. OF -IFAS Extension researchers conducted focus groups assessments and found that 48% of respondents "don't know where runoff goes" or "don't know what runoff is" (Seevers, Graham, Gamon, and Conklin, 1997). Pollution prevention programs promoting BMPs are more cost effective than restoration or stormwater treatment but require residents to make changes in their lifestyles to reduce their personal contribution to nutrient impacts. Education regarding stormwater BMPs has been shown to increase adoption of BMPs and improve water quality (Brehm, Pasko, and Eisenhauer 2013; Deitz, Clasen, and Filchak 2004; Swann 2000). OF -IFAS outlined many BMPs related to stormwater in their Florida Friendly Landscaping PrograMTM . Examples of recommended BMPs include (Ott, Monaghan, Wells, et. al. 2015): • Creating a low -maintenance buffer of at least 10 feet along water features that requires no mowing, fertilizer, or pesticide. • Following OF -IFAS recommendations for fertilizer rate, application, and timing. • Avoiding the application of fertilizer on hard surfaces like curbs, sidewalks, and roads. • Cleaning up any spilled fertilizer. • Avoiding fertilizer application before heavy rainfall. • Keeping grass clippings on lawns and off streets and sidewalks (where they wash into drains and enter ponds). • Picking up pet waste to prevent harmful bacteria and organisms from entering waterways. • Adjusting fertilizer amount to account for the nutrients in reclaimed water. Many of these stormwater BMPs are promoted by existing programs like Blue Life TM or will be covered by other individual education and outreach included in this plan. Therefore, the stormwater pond maintenance program will focus on vegetative buffers and their appropriate maintenance to reduce stormwater pollution. Brevard County contains 4,175 stormwater ponds covering 13,276 acres with 6,976,338 linear feet of shoreline. The average size of a pond is 3.2 acres with 1,671 linear feet of shoreline. These numbers include ponds affiliated with both residential and commercial areas. The average load to stormwater ponds is 11.4 lbs of TN per acre of land surrounding the pond annually according to FDEP's Spreadsheet Tool for Estimating Pollutant Loads (STEPL). Assuming that a 50 -foot perimeter directly impacts the pond, there are 8,008 acres contributing 91,288 lbs of TN annually to the ponds. Of this, up to 40% of the TN is removed through retention in the pond leaving a potential 54,773 lbs/yr of TN to enter the lagoon. For TP, approximately 18,836 lbs/yr is entering the stormwater pond. Of this, up to 65% of the TP is removed through retention in the pond leaving a potential of 6,593 lbs/yr TP to enter the lagoon. Creating a 10 -foot -wide low -maintenance buffer zone of grasses has the potential to remove about 25% of the TN and TP entering the pond (USEPA 2005). This amount increases with the width of the buffer and the addition of woody vegetation. For the plan calculations, the assumption was made that convincing homeowners to not mow a 10 -foot buffer is the easiest practice to achieve. The pond will remove up to 40% of the remaining TN. Assuming that the education campaign can reach at least half of the 48% of people unaware of what stormwater is, the reduction could be 3,286 lbs/yr of TN and 396 lbs/yr of TP. Conducting an outreach campaign with an initial $50,000 social marketing research and development investment plus $25,000 in annual implementation, would require a 10 -year total budget of $300,000. This would result in reductions at $91/lbs of TN and $750 lbs/yr of TP (see Prepared by Tetra Tech, Inc. and Closewaters, LLC Save Our Indian River Lagoon Project Plan 2018 Update, April 2018 Table 11). Additionally, during focus group research in the first year, it may be possible to identify other BMPs that homeowners' associations are willing to adopt that would further improve the performance of their stormwater pond. This would improve the cost effectiveness of this campaign. Table 11: Estimated TN and TP Reductions and Costs from Stormwater BMP Maintenance Cost Estimated TN Cost/lb/yr of Estimated TPCost/lb/yr of Reductions lbs/ r TN Removed Reductions (lbs/r TP Removed $300,000 3,300 $91 400 $750 Note: The projects highlighted in green are the most cost-effective and are recommended as part of this plan. Septic Systems Maintenance (added in 2018) Nationwide, 10-20% of septic systems are failing from overuse, improper maintenance, unsuitable drainfield conditions, and high-water table. When septic systems are older and failing or are installed over poor soils close to the groundwater table or open water, they can be a major contributor of nutrients and bacterial and viral pathogens to the system. Overuse can occur when too much water is flushed through the system, which does not allow the microbes to properly process the nutrients. Overuse can also occur when more solids enter the tank than can be decomposed by the microbes. With improper and infrequent maintenance, sludge can build up in the tank which decreases its capacity. In addition, cracks and damage to the tank may go undiagnosed, which allows for prolonged leakage of untreated effluent into the groundwater. Improper maintenance can also allow solids to clog the drainfield, which inhibits its ability to process nutrients and pathogens. Nutrient and pathogen processing also declines when drainfields are flooded by a high-water table. A properly functioning septic tank and drainfield system reduces TN by 30-40%. However, the reduction has been measured at 0-20% in adverse conditions. The best available studies estimate a 10% reduction in nitrogen within a properly maintained tank versus an improperly maintained tank. The remaining 20-30% of nitrogen removal occurs in a properly functioning drainfield. If 10% of systems are failing and failing systems attenuate 30% less of the nitrogen load, these systems may pose far greater impacts to the groundwater, tributaries, and lagoon than the average impact reported for properly functioning systems. Without the 30% reduction, the potential load to the IRL and its tributaries is estimated to be 39 lbs/yr of TN for properties within 50 meters (instead of 27.1 lbs/yr of TN for functioning systems) and 10 lbs/yr of TN for properties up to 200 meters away (instead of 6.9 lbs TN/yr for functioning systems). There are an estimated 59,438 septic systems in Brevard County within the IRL Basin. Of these, 41,077 are close enough to the IRL and its tributaries to be contributing significant amounts of nitrogen. To address this source, this plan is funding either removal or upgrades of the 3,734 septic systems responsible for the highest likely pollutant loads. The remaining 37,343 systems are still impacting the IRL based on their location, and many of these may be failing based on USEPA reports of failure rates. As noted in Section 4.1.4, the total loading of septic systems within 50 meters of the IRL and its tributaries is calculated at 408,863 lbs/yr of TN, and the total loading of systems within 200 meters is 178,395 lbs/yr of TN. If the failure rate in Brevard County is about 10%, and if failing systems receive 30% less attenuation, then failing systems within 50 meters of open water are contributing an extra 17,957 lbs/yr of TN while failing systems between 50 and 200 meters of open water are Prepared by Tetra Tech, Inc. and Closewaters, LLC 236 Save Our Indian River Lagoon Project Plan 2018 Update, April 2018 contributing an extra 8,145 lbs/yr of TN. By factoring in this failure rate, the total additional loading to the IRL from failing septic systems is approximately 26,102 lbs/yr of TN. A 10 -year outreach campaign budget of $300,000, which includes $50,000 for research and campaign development and $25,000 per year for implementation, would strive to reduce the number of failing systems county -wide by 25%, thereby reducing the excess loading from failing systems by 6,525 lbs/yr of TN. This would result in average cost of $46/lb of TN (see Table 12). Table 12: Estimated TN Reductions and Costs from Septic Svstem Maintenance Cost Estimated TN Cost/lb/yr of Reductions (lbs/r TN Removed $300,000 6,500 $46 Note: The projects highlighted in green are the most cost-effective and are recommended as part of this plan. 4.1.2 WWTF Upgrades Upgrades for Reclaimed Water The direct WWTF discharges to the lagoon have been gg/ of the reclaimed water largely removed, and the majority of facilities in the basin in the County is used in use the treated effluent for reclaimed water irrigation. While the use of reclaimed water for irrigation is an excellent public access areas and for approach to conserving potable water, if the reclaimed landscape irrigation water is high in nutrient concentrations, the application of the reclaimed water for irrigation can result in nutrients leaching into the groundwater. It is important to note that there are no regulations on the concentration of nutrients in reclaimed water that is used for irrigation. However, OF -IFAS studies indicate that a nitrogen concentration of 5 to 9 mg/L is optimal for turfgrass growth, and each year a maximum amount of 1 lb of nitrogen can be applied per 1,000 ft2 of turf (UF -IFAS 2013a and 2013b). Nitrogen leaching increases significantly when irrigation is greater than 2 cm/week (0.75 in/week), even if the nitrogen concentrations are half of the maximum IFAS recommendation of 9 mg/L. In Brevard County, 88% of the reclaimed water is used in public access areas and for landscape irrigation. The total reclaimed water used countywide is approximately 18.5 million gallons per day (mgd), which is applied over 7,340 acres. The unincorporated County and city WWTFs with the reclaimed water flows and TN concentrations are shown in Table 13. This table also summarizes the excess TN in the reclaimed water after environmental attenuation/uptake (75% for TN [FDEP 2017]), for both the current TN effluent concentration and if the facility were upgraded to achieve a TN effluent concentration of 6 mg/L (the City of Palm Bay WRF update would achieve a TN effluent concentration of 7.5 mg/L and the City of Melbourne Grant Street WWTF would achieve a TN effluent concentration of 5 mg/L). Prepared by Tetra Tech, Inc. and C/osewaters, LLC 25q Save Our Indian River Lagoon Project Plan 2018 Update, April 2018 Table 13: TN Concentrations in WWTF Reclaimed Water The estimated costs for the WWTF upgrade and the cost per pound of nitrogen removed as a result of the upgrade are shown in Table 14. Based on a 2007 study by U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA), the cost to upgrade WWTFs to meet advanced wastewater treatment standards is approximately $4,200,000 per plant. This cost is in 2006 dollars, which, when inflated to 2016 dollars and costs are included for design and permitting, is approximately $6,000,000 per facility. Where cost estimates were available for facility upgrades, these costs were used instead of the USEPA inflated estimated. Due to the high cost per pound of TN removed to upgrade some of these facilities compared to other projects in this plan, only those facilities highlighted in green are recommended for upgrades as part of this plan. Prepared by Tetra Tech, Inc. and Closewaters, LLC 258 Permitted Reclaimed TN TN After TN After Facility Capacity Water Flow Concentration Attenuation Attenuation (mgd) (mgd) (mg/L) (lbs/year) and Upgrade (lbs/year) City of Palm Bay Water Reclamation Facility WRF 4.0 0.656 29.4 14,927 3,808 City of Melbourne Grant Street WWTF 5.5 2.08 21.0 33,806 8,049 City of Titusville Osprey WWTF 2.75 1.56 17.9 21,612 7,244 Brevard County Barefoot Bay Water Reclamation Facility 0.9 0.48 11.9 4,421 2,229 Brevard County North Re ional WWTF 0.9 0.26 11.4 2,294 1,207 City of West Melbourne Ray Bullard WRF 2.5 0.85 11.1 11,684 6,315 Brevard County Port St. John WWTF 0.5 0.35 10.7 2,898 1,625 Brevard County South Beaches WWTF 8.0 1.12 9.3 8,061 5,201 Rockledge WWTF 4.5 1.40 7.0 12,136 10,402 Brevard County South Central Regional WWTF 5.5 3.79 6.7 19,653 17,600 City of Titusville Blue Heron WWTF 4.0 0.84 4.8 4,993 N/A City of Cape Canaveral WRF 1.8 0.88 3.8 4,141 N/A City of Cocoa Jerry Sellers WRF 4.5 1.44 3.5 6,241 N/A Brevard County Sykes Creek WWTF 6.0 1.48 1 3.4 3,895 1 N/A City of Cocoa Beach WRF 6.0 3.66 1 2.5 11,331 1 N/A The estimated costs for the WWTF upgrade and the cost per pound of nitrogen removed as a result of the upgrade are shown in Table 14. Based on a 2007 study by U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA), the cost to upgrade WWTFs to meet advanced wastewater treatment standards is approximately $4,200,000 per plant. This cost is in 2006 dollars, which, when inflated to 2016 dollars and costs are included for design and permitting, is approximately $6,000,000 per facility. Where cost estimates were available for facility upgrades, these costs were used instead of the USEPA inflated estimated. Due to the high cost per pound of TN removed to upgrade some of these facilities compared to other projects in this plan, only those facilities highlighted in green are recommended for upgrades as part of this plan. Prepared by Tetra Tech, Inc. and Closewaters, LLC 258 Save Our Indian River Lagoon Project Plan 2018 Update, April 2018 Table 14: Cost per Pound of TN Removed from WWTF Upgrades to Improve Reclaimed Water Facility Cost to Upgrade TN Removed after Attenuation (lbs/r Cost/lb/yr of TN Removed City of Palm Bay WRF $1,400,000 11,119 $125 City of Titusville Osprey WWTF $8,000,000 14,368 $557 City of West Melbourne Ray Bullard WRF $6,000,000 5,368 $1,118 Barefoot Bay WRF $6,000,000 2,192 $2,737 Port St. John WWTF $6,000,000 1,273 $4,713 City of Melbourne Grant Street WWTF* 1 $6,000,000 1,107* $5,421* North Regional WWTF 1 $6,000,000 1,087 $5,522 Note: The projects highlighted in green are the most cost-effective and are recommended as part of this plan. * After the plan was adopted, it was determined that the reclaimed water flow and TN concentration used for the Melbourne Grant Street WWTF were incorrect. The actual TN that could be removed from this project is 25,627 lbs/yr. This project was added to the plan as part of the 2018 Update (see Section 6.3). As part of the public education and outreach efforts, customers who use reclaimed water for irrigation should be informed of the nutrient content in the reuse water because they can and should eliminate or reduce the amount of fertilizer added to their lawn and landscaping. This information can be provided to the customers through their utility bill. 4.1.3 Sewer Laterals Rehabilitation (added in 2098) Sewage overflows following heavy rainfall events are an indicator of illegal connections or inadequate sewer asset conditions. There are three major components of wastewater flow in a sanitary sewer system: (1) base sanitary (or wastewater) flow, (2) groundwater infiltration, and (3) rainfall inflow. Virtually every sewer system has some infiltration and/or inflow (I&I). Historically, small amounts of I&I are expected and tolerated. However, I&I becomes excessive when it causes overflows, health, and/or environmental risks. Overflows from the South Beaches WWTF sewer system have occurred 7 of the last 13 years, including significant overflows following Hurricane Matthew in 2016 and Hurricane Irma in 2017. Less frequent overflows and line breaks have occurred in other sewer service areas. In 2012, in recognition of aging infrastructure and increasingly frequent issues, the Brevard County Utilities Services Department engaged seven professional engineering firms to perform independent field evaluations of the condition of the sewage infrastructure assets located in each of the County's seven independent sewer service areas. The output of this investigation was identification of $134 million in specific capital improvement needs required over a ten-year period to bring County -owned sewer system assets up to a fully -functional, reliable, affordable, efficient, and maintainable condition (Brevard County Utilities Services 2013). The field evaluation results and corresponding 10 -year Capital Improvement Program Plan were presented to the Brevard County Commission in 2013. In response, the Commission approved financing the entire Capital Improvement Program Plan and increased the County's sewer service rates to repay the debt. Plan implementation began in 2014 and projects are progressing quickly. Because there was already a capital improvement plan and funding mechanism for updating the County's aging sewer system infrastructure, the original Save Our Indian River Lagoon Project Plan did not include analysis or funding for sewer system repairs. Unfortunately, even in areas where capital improvements have been made, I&I continues to be a problem that contributes to overflows that discharge untreated wastewater into the IRL. This indicates the probability of problems outside the County -owned assets and could include illegal connections and/or leaks in the privately owned lateral connections of homes and businesses to the County sewer system. Prepared by Tetra Tech, Inc. and Closewaters, LLC Save Our Indian River Lagoon Project Plan 2018 Update, April 2018 Identifying problems on the customer side of the connection will require smoke testing each building or private residence to determine if leaks or illegal connections are present. The extent of I&I on the customer side of the connections is unknown and, therefore, the nutrient loading associated with these issues are also unknown. As a first step to determine the extent of I&I problems with the sewer laterals, the County is partnering with the City of Satellite Beach on a pilot project to perform smoke testing of approximately 5,400 buildings and residences within the city in March through May of 2018. Based on the data collected during the pilot study, an evaluation will be made on the next steps to reduce nutrient loading from broken or leaky sewer laterals. Repair of privately owned portions of the sewer system is not funded in the adopted Capital Improvement Program Plan; therefore, consideration has been given to the use of the Save Our Indian River Lagoon Tax funding. The Brevard County Utilities Services Department estimates that I&I due to rainfall and flooding associated with Hurricane Irma, caused 1,835 lbs/yr of TN and 350 lbs/yr of TP to enter the lagoon from sewer overflowing from the South Beaches Regional WWTF sewer system. If repairing private connections could prevent similar overflows in the next 7 out of the last 13 years, then the average annual nitrogen reduction benefit of such repairs would be approximately 988 lbs/yr of TN. The average cost effectiveness of sewer expansion projects funded in the 2017 Plan Supplement was $852 per pound of nitrogen removed, thus the cost to reduce 988 lbs/yr of TN loading by implementing septic to sewer projects would be $841,842. Therefore, this 2018 plan update includes a reserve of $840,000 to assist property owners with the cost to repair leaky sewer connections expected to be found through smoke testing. The Save Our Indian River Lagoon Trust Fund will also be used to conduct performance monitoring to measure the nutrient reduction benefits of repairing privately -owned leaky lateral connections. The results of performance monitoring will be used to consider expansion of this program from the Satellite Beach pilot areas to other city and county sewer service areas. Table 15: Estimated Sewer Laterals Rehabilitation TN and TP Reductions and Costs Note: The projects highlighted in green are the most cost-effective and are recommended as part of this plan. 4.1.4 Septic System Removal and Upgrades - - — Septic systems are commonly used where central sewer does not One septic system i exist. When properly sited, designed, constructed, maintained, within 55 yards of a and operated, septic systems are often a safe means of disposing surface waterbody of domestic waste but still add nutrients to the system. However, contributes 27 lbs of when septic systems are older and failing or are installed over TN per year. poor soils close to the groundwater table or open water, they can -- be a major contributor of nutrients and bacterial and viral pathogens to the system. There are an estimated 59,438 septic systems in Brevard County within the IRL Basin (Table 16). In order to address this source, options for both septic system removal and septic system upgrades were evaluated. It is important to note that although the County is taking the lead on these projects, the Florida Department of Prepared by Tetra Tech, Inc. and Closewaters, LLC Estimated Cost/Ib/yr Estimated TP Cost/lb/yr Project Bumd r of Cost TN of TN Reductions of TP ngs Reductions Removed (lbs/yr) Removed lbs/ r Satellite Beach Pilot Area 5,400 1 $840,000 1 988 1 $850 1 188 1 $4,468 Note: The projects highlighted in green are the most cost-effective and are recommended as part of this plan. 4.1.4 Septic System Removal and Upgrades - - — Septic systems are commonly used where central sewer does not One septic system i exist. When properly sited, designed, constructed, maintained, within 55 yards of a and operated, septic systems are often a safe means of disposing surface waterbody of domestic waste but still add nutrients to the system. However, contributes 27 lbs of when septic systems are older and failing or are installed over TN per year. poor soils close to the groundwater table or open water, they can -- be a major contributor of nutrients and bacterial and viral pathogens to the system. There are an estimated 59,438 septic systems in Brevard County within the IRL Basin (Table 16). In order to address this source, options for both septic system removal and septic system upgrades were evaluated. It is important to note that although the County is taking the lead on these projects, the Florida Department of Prepared by Tetra Tech, Inc. and Closewaters, LLC Save Our Indian River Lagoon Project Plan 2018 Update, April 2018 Health (FDOH) is responsible for the regulation and permitting of septic systems. The County will coordinate with FDOH on the septic system projects recommended in this plan. Table 16: Location of Se tic Systems in Brevard County Area Number of Septic Systems St. Johns River Basin 22,514 Banana River Lagoon 4,628 North IRL 15,899 Central IRL 38,911 Total 81,952 Septic System Removal To identify potential locations for septic system removal through connection to the central sewer system, the County prioritized those areas with septic systems in close proximity to surface waters (ditches, canals, creeks, and the IRL). As shown below in Table 19, septic systems within 55 yards of a surface water have the greatest impact and systems more than 219 yards from a surface water contribute very little TN loading. In addition, the County also inventoried existing sewer service areas for available capacity. The existing service areas include: • Brevard County North Brevard (Mims) • Brevard County Port St. John • Brevard County Sykes Creek (Merritt Island) • Brevard County South Central (Suntree and Viera) • Brevard County South Beaches (Patrick AFB to Melbourne Beach) • Brevard County Barefoot Bay • City of Cape Canaveral • City of Cocoa • City of Cocoa Beach • City of Melbourne • City of Palm Bay • City of Rockledge • City of Titusville • City of West Melbourne The estimated cost per lot for connection to central sewer lines is $20,000 and includes electrical work, plumbing, removing the septic tank, and sewer connection fees. The actual cost per lot will vary depending on site conditions. This amount of funding would offset most, if not the entire, cost per customer. The estimated nutrient loads from the septic systems that will travel through the groundwater and intersect with a surface waterbody (tributaries, canals, and the lagoon itself) were estimated using typical septic system effluent concentrations and decay rates from USEPA (2002) (Table 17). This information is for a single family residential property. For projects with septic systems for other buildings (apartments, commercial, etc.), loading estimates can be scaled by comparing the flow data for that property to the average flow volume for single family residential. The estimated travel times based on the distance from the septic system to a waterbody are shown in Table 18, and is based on an interpretation of the results from a recent study in the City of Port St. Lucie by Sayemuzzaman and Ye 2015. The concentration of each parameter for each buffer zone was calculated using the effluent concentration and decay rates in Table 17 and the travel times in Table 18. The concentrations used in'the estimates for this plan are shown in Table 19. Prepared by Tetra Tech, Inc. and Closewaters, LLC 2fsh Save Our Indian River Lagoon Project Plan 2018 Update, April 2018 Table 17: Septic System Effluent Concentrations and Decay Rates Parameter Effluent Concentration (mg/1L Decay Rate 1/da TN 70 0.1 Organic N 0.458 0.1 Ammonia 10.5 0.1 Nitrate + Nitrite 59.3 0.0011 Organic P* 0.3 0.014 Orthophosphate* 0 0.014 * Assumes that 90% of phosphorus is sorbed to sediment. Table 18: Travel Time Based on Distance from Septic System to Waterbod Buffer Zone Travel Distance (yards) Average Velocity (yards/day) Average Travel Time (days) Average Travel Time ears 1 <55 0.199 137.6 0.4 2 55-219 0.138 1,385.7 3.8 3 >219 0.066 9,641.0 26.4 Table 19: Parameter Concentrations from Each Buffer Zone Parameter Buffer Zone 1 Concentration m/L(mg/1L) Buffer Zone 2 Concentration Buffer Zone 3 Concentration m/L Organic N 0.000 0.000 0.000 Ammonia 0.000 0.000 0.000 Nitrate +Nitrite 50.971 12.914 0.001 Organic P 0.044 1 0.000 0.000 Ortho hos hate 0.000 1 0.000 0.000 The cost for connection of all the septic systems in the County within the IRL watershed would be approximately $1.2 billion (see Table 20). Therefore, this plan focuses on the locations where reductions through septic system removal are the most cost-effective. Table 20: Cost to Remove Septic Systems Based on Distance from a Surface Waterbodv Septic System Number TN TN Cost/System Cost/Ib/yr of Distance from of Septic (lbs/yr/system) (lbs/yr) to Connect Total Cost TN Surface Water Systems Less than 55 yards 15,090 27.095 408,863 $20,000 $301,800,000 $738 Between 55 and 219 yards 25,987 6.865 178,395 $20,000 $519,740,000 $2,913 Greater than 219 yards 18,361 0.001 10 $20,000 $367,220,000 $37,624,010 Total in IRL 59,438 N/A 587,268 $20,000 $1,188,760,000 $2024 Basin (average) Short-term and long-term opportunities for septic system removal were then identified. Short-term opportunities are neighborhoods with more than 50% of the septic systems being less than 55 yards from a surface water directly connected to the lagoon, and that only require limited extensions of infrastructure from existing service areas to connect to sewer service. In addition, short-term opportunities included areas where there are existing sewer lines and the buildings on septic systems only needed to be connected to the sewer system. The County identified these locations using data from FDOH, which were updated using the most current information from the Prepared by Tetra Tech, Inc. and Closewaters, LLC 262 Save Our Indian River Lagoon Project Plan 2018 Update, April 2018 cities. The FDOH data likely still require updates and corrections; therefore, this plan provides the flexibility for projects to address field verified septic systems that are having the greatest impact on the lagoon (within 55 yards of a surface waterbody). For the short-term opportunities, the number of lots that could be connected, associated cost of the connection, and estimated TN reductions are shown in Table 21 for the Banana River Lagoon, Table 22 for the North IRL, and Table 23 for the Central IRL. Appendix C includes maps of each of these areas. Based on the cost per pound of TN removed, it was determined that the most cost-effective sewer connection projects were those that cost less than $1,200 per pound. The areas that could be connected for this cost are highlighted in green, and these highlighted areas are recommended for connection as part of the plan. These short-term opportunities represent. the connection of approximately 3.9% of the septic systems in Brevard County within the IRL Basin. In Palm Bay, an opportunity exists to hook up many lots to existing sewer lines for $12,000 per connection. This is recommended for high priority septic systems located within 55 yards of an open water connection to the lagoon. Table 21: Short -Term Opportunities for Septic System Removal in Banana River La oon Service Area Number of Lots Cost TN Reduction Ibs/ r TN Cost/lb/yr Sykes Creek - Zone N 86 $1,720,000 2,330 $738 Sykes Creek - Zone M 58 $1,160,000 1,572 $738 Sykes Creek - Zone T 139 $2,780,000 3,685 $754 Sykes Creek - Zone X 14 $280,000 359 $780 Sykes Creek - Zone V 98 $1,960,000 1,927 $1,017 Sykes Creek - Zone U 145 $2,900,000 2,573 $1,127 Sykes Creek - Zone Z 73 $1,460,000 1,290 $1,132 Sykes Creek - Zone W 142 $2,840,000 1,923 $1,477 Sykes Creek - Zone R 206 $4,120,000 2,686 $1,534 Sykes Creek - Zone Q 186 $3,720,000 2,319 $1,604 Sykes Creek - Zone S 163 $3,260,000 1,407 $2,317 Note: The projects highlighted in green are the most cost-effective and are recommended as part of this plan. Prepared by Tetra Tech, Inc. and Closewaters, LLC 20 Save Our Indian River Lagoon Project Plan 2018 Update, April 2018 Table 22: Short -Term Opportunities for Septic System Removal in North IRL Service Area Number of Lots Cost TN Reduction (lbs/r TN Cost/lb/yr City of Cocoa - Zone K 34 $680,000 921 $738 City of Melbourne 12 $240,000 325 $738 City of Rockledge 16 $320,000 434 $738 South Beaches - Zone A 42 $840,000 1,098 $765 City of Titusville 33 $660,000 833 $792 City of Cocoa - Zone J 78 $1,560,000 1,891 $825 South Central - Zone C 132 $2,640,000 3,132 $843 South Central - Zone A 115 $2,300,000 2,239 $1,027 South Central -Zone D 94 $1,880,000 1,730 $1,087 Sykes Creek - Zone C 85 $1,700,000 1,426 $1,192 Sykes Creek - Zone B 207 $4,140,000 3,038 $1,363 Port St. John - Zone B 197 $3,940,000 2,849 $1,383 South Central - Zone B 190 $3,800,000 2,486 $1,528 Sykes Creek - Zone H 77 $1,540,000 992 $1,552 Sykes Creek - Zone 1 31 $620,000 386 $1,605 Sykes Creek - Zone G 53 $1,060,000 632 $1,679 Sykes Creek - Zone J 55 $1,100,000 503 $2,186 Sykes Creek - Zone K 170 $3,400,000 1,539 $2,210 Sykes Creek - Zone O 161 $3,220,000 1,158 $2,782 Sykes Creek - Zone A 247 $4,940,000 1,767 $2,796 Sykes Creek - Zone Y 168 $3,360,000 1,083 $3,102 Sykes Creek - Zone F 24 $480,000 95 $5,051 Sykes Creek - Zone L 175 $3,500,000 687 $5,098 Sykes Creek - Zone P 342 $6,840,000 1,074 $6,372 Sykes Creek - Zone E 86 $1,720,000 217 $7,934 Sykes Creek - Zone D 85 $1,700,000 183 $9,279 Port St. John - Zone C 82 $1,640,000 96 $17,058 South Beaches - Zone B 170 $3,400,000 1 123 $27,742 Port St. John - Zone A 55 $1,100,000 1 7 $159,571 Note: The projects highlighted in green are the most cost-effective and are recommended as part of this plan. Table 23: Short -Term Opportunities for Septic System Removal in Central IRL Service Area Number of Lots Cost TN Reduction (lbs/r TN Cost/lb/yr City of Palm Bay - near sewer lines 647 $7,764,000 17,530 $443 City of Palm Ba - Zone B 235 $4,700,000 6,347 $741 City of West Melbourne 112 $2,240,000 2,974 $753 City of Palm Ba -ZoneA 99 $1,980,000 1,893 $1,046 South Beaches - Zone D 62 $1,240,000 558 $2,221 South Beaches - Zone C 124 $2,480,000 579 $4,282 Table 24: Summary of Septic System Removal Projects by Sub-Laqoon Sub -lagoon Number of Lots Cost TN Reductions (lbs/r Average Cost/lb/yr of TN Banana River Lagoon 613 $12,260,000 13,736 $898 North IRL 641 $12,820,000 14,029 $875 Central IRL 446 $8,920,000 11,214 $795 Total 1 1,7001 $34,000,000 1 38,979 $872 Note: This summary does not include the connection of septic systems near existing sewer lines in Palm Bay. Prepared by Tetra Tech, Inc. and Closewaters, LLC Save Our Indian River Lagoon Project Plan 2018 Update, April 2018 There are also areas identified for long-term septic system connection opportunities, which are listed in Table 25. The long-term opportunities require more time and expense to build WWTF capacity and service infrastructure. Therefore, these systems are not recommended for funding as part of this plana However, these areas have a large concentration of septic systems that are impacting the lagoon, and other funding options to address the septic systems in these areas could be explored in the future, if needed. Table 25: Lonq-Term Opportunities for Septic System Connections Service Area Number of Lots Cost TN Reduction (lbs/r TN Cost/lb/yr South Merritt Island 1,903 $38,060,000 25,086 $1,517 North Merritt Island 1,487 $29,740,000 19,148 $1,553 Port St. John 688 $13,760,000 6,806 $2,022 South Beaches 2,347 $46,940,000 22,095 $2,125 Little Hollywood 802 $16,040,000 7,123 $2,252 Port St. John — Cocoa Gap 974 $19,480,000 7,618 $2,557 Total 8,201 $164,020,000 87,876 $2,004 (average) Another opportunity for removing septic systems is to use a hybrid septic tank effluent pumping (STEP) system. In this system, effluent from the septic tank is connected to sewer pressure lines. Small -diameter pipes, which can be installed relatively quickly, are used instead of the gravity sewer system. A high pressure'/2 horse power pump (115 volt) pumps the effluent from the septic system to a force main or gravity sewer system. The City of Vero Beach is installing these systems and they are leaving the drainfields in place, which saves money and allows for a backup in the event that a power outage affects the STEP pumping system. If the drainfield is not left in place, a 500 -gallon pump chamber is installed to allow enough reserve capacity to address power outages. Each STEP system also has an emergency generator receptacle to address long-term power outages associated with hurricanes. The estimated cost per connection is $6,000 to $10,000, which includes the cost of the pipes. The City of Vero Beach maintains the STEP system and pumps out the septic tank when needed. The customer pays the electrical costs to operate the pump for this system. For properties within 55 yards of a waterbody and located within the vicinity of a pressure line or gravity sewer system, the STEP system may be a good option instead of the septic system upgrades described below. If STEP systems are selected as a preferred option anywhere in Brevard County, specific locations for STEP system installation can be submitted for funding consideration through the annual project funding request and plan update process. Septic System Upgrades In locations where providing sewer service is not feasible due to distance from sewer infrastructure, facility capacity, or insufficient density of high risk systems, there are options to upgrade the highest risk septic systems to increase the nutrient and pathogen removal efficiency. In recent years, research has been conducted on passive treatment systems, which provide significant treatment efficiencies without monthly sewer fees or highly complex maintenance needs for mechanical features. One option for a septic system upgrade is to add a biosorption activated media (BAM) to enhance nutrient and bacterial removal before the effluent reaches the drainfield or groundwater. Examples of BAM include mixes of soil, sawdust, zeolites, tire crumb, vegetation, sulfur, and spodosols (Wanielista et. al. 2011). A test of the BAM removal capacity was conducted at Florida's Showcase Green Envirohome in Indialantic, Florida. This test location is a residential site built with stormwater, graywater, and wastewater treatment in a compact footprint onsite (Wanielista Prepared by Tetra Tech, Inc. and Closewaters, LLC Save Our Indian River Lagoon Project Plan 2018 Update, April 2018 et. al. 2011). The media used in this study was Bold & GoldT"', which is a patented blend of mineral materials, sand, and clay. In this study, the effluent to the septic tank was evenly divided between a sorption filter media bed/conventional drainfield in series (innovative system) and to a conventional drainfield. The study found that the TN and TP removal efficiencies were 76.9% and 73.6%, respectively, for the Bold & Gold plus drainfield system, which was significantly higher than the 45.5% TN removal and 32.1 % TP removal from a conventional drainfield alone. Another pilot study was conducted at the University of Central Florida using wastewater from the 15 -person BPW Scholarship House, which contains a kitchen and living quarters. The wastewater is pumped to septic tanks from where the effluents are divided into the test Bold & Gold drainfield and the standard drainfields. The Bold & Gold system was designed to provide aerobic and anoxic environments, which allowed for nitrification and denitrification to occur. In this study, the media used was a sand layer on top of a mixture of approximately 68% fine sand, 25% tire crumbs, and 7% sawdust by volume. Overall, TN was reduced by 70.2% and TP was reduced by 81.8%. In addition, the removal efficiency of Escherichia coli was 99.93% (Chang et. al. 2010). Another option for a septic system upgrade is the use of passive nitrogen removing systems, and FDOH recently completed a study on the efficiency and costs of these systems. FDOH defines a passive system as, "A type of enhanced conventional onsite sewage treatment and disposal system that excludes the use of aerator pumps, includes no more than one effluent dosing pump with mechanical and moving parts, and uses a reactive media to assist in nitrogen removal." This definition of passive includes the use of up to one pump because of Florida's flat topography and the need to move water to allow for treatment (FDOH 2015). To determine the feasibility of using passive nitrogen removing system, FDOH contracted with Hazen and Sawyer. The types of passive systems that were tested fell into two general categories: (a) in -tank system and (b) in -ground system. In the in -tank system concept, wastewater flows through the septic tank (STE) to a tank filled with an unsaturated layer of expanded clay (lignocellulosic material) (Stage 1). The wastewater is then sent to a pump tank (NO3 Recycle), which recycles a portion back to the top of Stage 1. The rest of the wastewater is pumped into a tank with two sections: a saturated layer of wood -chip material (Stage 2A), and a saturated mixture of sulfur and oyster shells (Stage 2B). The wastewater then flows by gravity to the existing drainfield or soil treatment unit (STU) (Dispersal). This concept is shown in Figure 10. NO, Recycle TE STAGE I STAGE S ZAgGE '' 2A Note: from Hazen and Sawyer 2015 Figure 10: Example Diagram of an In -Tank Two Stage Biofilter Prepared by Tetra Tech, Inc. and Closewaters, LLC Zf NO, Recycle Ground Surface Wastewater from Home { .2a 21b, STU Subsurface Septic Tank Recirculation St1 Dispersal age (Primary Tank it ed Stage 2ed Treatment) BiofilterSaturated (Nitrification) Pump Biofilter (Denitrification) Tank Note: from Hazen and Sawyer 2015 Figure 10: Example Diagram of an In -Tank Two Stage Biofilter Prepared by Tetra Tech, Inc. and Closewaters, LLC Zf Save Our Indian River Lagoon Project Plan 2018 Update, April 2018 In the in -ground system concept, wastewater flows through the septic tank (STE) to a pump tank which pressure doses a lined drainfield to spread the sewage throughout the drainfield. Under the drainfield, within the liner, are two layers: an unsaturated layer of regular drainfield sand (Stage 1) above a saturated layer of wood -chip material (Stage 2). The treated wastewater flows over the rim of the liner (Perimeter) into the soil (Dispersal). This concept is shown in Figure 11. STE � SSANb� � 5T2GE � PERIMETER � � ' Ground Surface Wastewater from Home 1 Septic Tank Pump Stage 1 & 2Vertically Stacked Biofilter (Primary Treatment) Tank (Nitrification & Denitrification) Note: from Hazen and Sawyer 2015 Figure 11: Example Diagram of an In -Ground Stacked Biofilter In the test systems, the media depth ranged from 10 inches to 30 inches. The tanks used in the systems at the test sites ranged from 1,050 gallons to 2,800 gallons (Hazen and Sawyer 2015). System longevity could not be directly determined in these systems due to the very low use of media over the two-year study period. Theoretical calculations and literature review suggest that these systems could have a media life of 25 years or longer. For the in -tank Stage 2 biofilters, it would be relatively easy to replace reactive media, helping to extend the life of the system. The study systems were all retrofits of existing septic systems, which have a higher cost than new construction. In addition, these were prototype systems that were being constructed for the first time in Florida. The costs of these systems are expected to decrease with more widespread implementation. The estimated cost to retrofit a septic system to an in -tank passive system is $15,500 and the cost to retrofit to an in -ground system is $12,000. The results of the study found that the TN removal efficiency ranged from 65% to 98%, with an average removal of 90%. The TP removal efficiency ranged from 12% to 96%, with an average removal of 64% (FDOH 2015). In areas where septic systems are in close proximity to a surface waterbody but are not in a location where connection to the sewer system is feasible, adding BAM to the drainfield or upgrading to the passive nitrogen removing systems could be used to retrofit the existing septic systems. However, as of February 2018, permitting of such upgrades through the Florida Department of Health (FDOH) is held up in legal challenge. The estimated cost for these retrofits is $16,000 per septic system. Any operations and maintenance costs associated with these upgrades, once installed, will be the responsibility of the owner. To be conservative, the estimates of the TN reductions that could be achieved are based on an efficiency of 73.6% removal, which is the average efficiency from the two studies described above that tested BAM in the drainfield. The cost to upgrade all 15,090 septic systems within 55 yards of an open water connection to the lagoon, which were not recommended for connection to sewer, would be $241,440,000. Therefore, these systems were further evaluated to prioritize those posing the greatest risk to IRL water quality. The criteria used were the distance from the groundwater table, soil types, year the property was developed, population density, and proximity to surface waters. These scoring Prepared by Tetra Tech, Inc. and Closewaters, LLC 20 Save Our Indian River Lagoon Project Plan 2018 Update, April 2018 criteria were a variation on the method used by Martin County to evaluate their septic systems. Brevard County Natural Resources Management, Utilities, and Department of Health staff met and agreed on how to modify the Martin County criteria to best fit Brevard County. Additional details about the scoring criteria are shown in Table 26. The results of this scoring provided information used to prioritize septic systems for upgrades. The septic systems with the highest (worst) scores and within 55 yards of a surface waterbody are recommended for retrofit upgrades to reduce the impacts of these septic systems. on the waterbodies. The number of these lots and the costs by sub -lagoon are shown in Table 27. The locations of these septic system upgrades are shown in Figure 12, Figure 13, and Figure 14. It is important to note that the septic system locations shown in the figures were based on the best available data from FDOH and the cities, and additional systems may be field verified and eligible for upgrade funding. This upgrade opportunity addresses 2.3% of the septic systems in the IRL drainage basin. Funding for septic system connections and upgrades will be distributed to municipalities for projects within their jurisdiction for identified expansions of their sewer service areas, as appropriate. Prepared by Tetra Tech, Inc. and Closewaters, LLC 268 Save Our Indian River Lagoon Project Plan 2018 Update, April 2018 Table 26: Summary of Septic System Scoring Criteria Evaluation Scores Explanation Factors TN Removal Efficiency TN Reductions (lbs/r A- 0points: GWT > 48 inches These data were pulled from the USGS Soil 8points: GWT = 48 inches Groundwater Survey for Brevard County using Table 9 - Table (GWT) Estimates of Soil Properties, Column titled "Depth North IRL 515 12points: GWT < 48 inches to - Seasonal High Water Table." 73.6% 0 points: Most ideal soils for drainfield These data were scored by using the 2013 USGS B - Soil performance Soil Survey for Brevard County using an average 16,636 Types of scores from a table created by County staff. The $802 8points: Moderate drainfield performance scoring was based on an average of permeability $22,192,000 1 37,581 1 12points: xcessively or poorly drained soils following the Martin County example. C - Surface 4points: Property developed after 1986 These scores were derived by joining the property 8 points: Property developed between 1980 Water appraiser data to the scoring table and- scoring Management and 1986 based on the year built field. 12points: Property developed before 1980 Systems The population density is the zoning of the parcel collected from Municode using "minimum expected 4points: Low Density < 2 units per acre density" for unincorporated county areas. Low D _ Density = less than 2 units per acre, Medium Population Density = 2-5 units per acre, High Density = Density 8points: Medium Density > 2-5 units per acre greater than 5 units per acre. Areas outside of unincorporated Brevard were scored using the size of the parcel (less than .2 acres = High Density, .2 to .5 = Medium and Greater than .5 acres = Low 12points: High Density > 5 units per acre Density). 4 points: Properties greater than 219 yards E - Proximity from an open channel Identified parcels within 20 feet of the IRL; parcels 8 Points: Properties within 55 yards of any to Surface between 55 yards and 219 yards of an open Waters open channel channel polyline; parcels greater than 219 yards 12 points: Properties with boundary along the from an open channel polyline. La oon or within 20 feet of IRL shoreline Table 27: Septic Tank Upgrades and Costs for Highest Priority Septic Systems within 55 Yards of a Surface Waterbod Sub -lagoon Number of Lots Cost TN Load (lbs/r TN Removal Efficiency TN Reductions (lbs/r Cost/lb/yr of TN Banana River Lagoon 258 $4,128,000 6,991 73.6% 5,145 $802 North IRL 515 $8,240,000 13,954 73.6% 10,270 $802 Central IRL* 614 $9,824,000 16,636 73.6% 12,244 $802 Total 1,387 1 $22,192,000 1 37,581 1 73.6% 1 27,659 $802 Note: The projects highlighted in green are the most cost-effective and are recommended as part of this plan. * The projects in the Central IRL sub -lagoon are located both in Zone A and Zone SEB (refer to Section 2.1). Prepared by Tetra Tech, Inc. and Closewaters, LLC Save Our Indian River Lagoon Project Plan 2018 Update, April 2018 N 1} 1� 0 �P \ • �• M ;II` � S ° t • ` 0 1.5 3 1 • o t l • i� r� Miles Qi! � ••I� <\� Imo" v ° \.. 'F _16 MAIN �^• LER 1i Gi,IL—gyp,--- -�'� �-. •�F a• \�t� , C >^ ..O ., GAPDEV 41 �r Q `,\ FOX ��• LAKE I , i zi, Z C U" Z 4 V CHENEY,, r cr ' . /t• I SR. 50—COLUMS 1 ! _� • I .° /+ Cr IciNcs 1 "it r f {^ PORT 'Y� '• 1 ^� • rf t�f4 ST JOHN•!� , I f.. f 1 p CAQ CAVERAL GROVES jj J1� fIRVS r ❑ 0 k• I !i t A —a��— Septic Tank Rating • S?php tanks wdn amen >47 and orated <55 yards Mom ro Wr s i+r « Crnp7atE ii Brevard pr..4nwn Note: The septic system locations are from the FDOH permit database. This database includes all septic systems permitted since 1980 or that have received repair permits since that time. County staff removed nearly 10,000 locations from FDOH maps based on confirmation data from municipalities for specific lots that have connected to sewer. Figure 12: Map of Locations for Septic System Upgrades in North IRL Prepared by Tetra Tech, Inc. and Closewaters, LLC 270 Save Our Indian River Lagoon Project Plan 2018 Update, April 2018 1 CANAVERAL GROVES, y f Y crrRUSi fl �', b _ ❑ ,GRANT �iy ❑ �1 ' \V - ) F ' JAMES L iN�TT12C1U}A'ERA ....� / I 5?e _ y > CENTRA S Qi LL yS'' 0 1 f 0 1.5 3 Miles \ X F g r x P 2 S *. w a R � 9"ayT •@ O z -LAKE Q OQ MERRIA 0g.R am r or; KING ja Lot, (S(A"'77TT����' BEACH,- _7 UCKE \ \ z00. r to (BARNES Vs JUDGE FRAN A JAMIESON YL ISPYGLASQy; Z • •`O�G 'f �. 014 i •�� p ti+ F w O � _ ,COST •\� � � CASSIA� \, aESOTO• PARKWAY10' PINE LAKE Qp ` TRE i .11INGTON z t� yy O AURORA;. 1 L EAU G�ALLIEJ,.,+�� iE � �y a SARNO ` `yI 13 r Y0 m I gi rc • O�CO ` �'�1 / lD NASA 7 � I -� �, R •� H BISCUSA \ 1 .182 _p � Yom` Oe:r t.6'D.4 Septic Tank Rating i/ rd 5reva • SePVC MnkS whh Scores W Slid IOMW 455 ya'ds tan cantor • e u r r �w Note: The septic system locations are from the FDOH permit database. This database includes all septic systems permitted since 1980 or that have received repair permits since that time. County staff removed nearly 10,000 locations from FDOH maps based on confirmation data from municipalities for specific lots that have connected to sewer. Figure 13: Map of Locations for Septic System Upgrades in Banana River Lagoon and North IRL Prepared by Tetra Tech, Inc. and Closewaters, LLC Save Our Indian River Lagoon Project Plan 2018 Update, April 2018 tAKEWASHINGTON.• p 1Oqp O a �O l i3 EAU GAL,LIE IV X -11 e' d SARNO yaO 4 rc • % -QQ �, NSA S Ate' •� •! �Iscus e' Fri 0 1.5 3 ` � H • Miles y to Z ♦ UNIVERSITY D x PIRATE y �J ft PALM .BAY i yy - PORT' F • � 4 � Lt MALABAR o. .R1PfTER + �� • LA s O t a • i •a 'TWBr ogOM GRANT ORf S1pooss t L ! s U T, MICCO Septic Tank Rating • Septic tanks with scores >47 and boated e55 Yards trona water !, r oar me^na 1drevard er.p..w,a Note: The septic system locations are from the FDOH permit database. This database includes all septic systems permitted since 1980 or that have received repair permits since that time. County staff removed nearly 10,000 locations from FDOH maps based on confirmation data from municipalities for specific lots that have connected to sewer. Figure 14: Map of Locations for Septic System Upgrades in Central IRL Prepared by Tetra Tech, Inc. and Closewaters, LLC Save Our Indian River Lagoon Project Plan 2018 Update, April 2018 4.1.5 Stormwater Treatment ---- _ - -- - Stormwater runoff from urban areas carries pollutants that Stormwater runoff contributes affect surface waters and groundwater. These pollutants 33.6% of the externa! TN include nutrients, pesticides, oil and grease, debris and loading and 43.4% of the litter, and sediments. In Brevard County, there are more external TP loading to the ' than 1,500 stormwater outfalls to the IRL. lagoon annually. - - There are a variety of BMPs that can be used to capture and treat stormwater to remove or reduce these pollutants before the stormwater runoff reaches a waterbody or infiltrates to the groundwater. Potential stormwater BMPs that could help restore the IRL system include: • Traditional BMPs — These BMPs are the typical practices that are used to treat stormwater runoff and include wet detention ponds, retention, swales, dry detention, baffle boxes, stormwater reuse, alum injection, street sweeping, catch basin inserts/inlet filters, floating islands/managed aquatic plant systems (MAPS). Descriptions of these traditional BMPs and expected TN and TP efficiencies are shown in Table 28. • Low impact development (LID)/green infrastructure (GI) — These types of BMPs use natural stormwater management techniques to minimize runoff and help prevent pollutants from getting into stormwater runoff. These BMPs address the pollutants at the source so implementing them can help decrease the size of traditional retention and detention basins and can be less costly than traditional BMPs (IFAS 2016). Descriptions of LID and GI BMPs and estimated efficiencies are shown in Table 29. • Denitrification BMPs — These BMPs use a soil media, known as BAM to increase the amount of denitrification that occurs, which increases the amount of TN and TP removed. BAM includes mixes of soil, sawdust, zeolites, tire crumb, vegetation, sulfur, and spodosols. Additional details about denitrification BMPs are included below. • BMPs to reduce baseflow intrusion — These projects are modifications to existing BMPs help reduce intrusion of captured groundwater baseflow into stormwater drainage systems. These BMPs include backfilling canals so that they do not cut through the baseflow, modifying canal cross-sections to maintain the same storage capacity while limiting the depth, installing weirs to control the water levels in the BMP, or adding a cutoff wall to prevent movement into the baseflow. • Re -diversion to the St. Johns River — There are portions of the current IRL Basin that historically flowed towards the St. Johns River. By re -diverting these flows back to the St. Johns River, the excess stormwater runoff, as well as the additional freshwater inputs, to the IRL would be removed. The re -diversion projects would include a treatment component so that the runoff is treated before being discharged to the St. Johns River. SJRWMD has taken the lead on large-scale projects while the County has re -diverted more than 400 acres in the Crane Creek basin and partnered with SJRWMD to increase re -diversion from the Melbourne -Tillman Water Control District canal system. Prepared by Tetra Tech, Inc. and Closewaters, LLC 2V N d C QJ W 0 Qi IL .d C M Z H 3 N IL m r R E L- 0 0 co w :D M co N m M M F- v a)o a)� a)fl-a)� 0 3 d 00 O o p o O o N O O O O C O �O WQ N CL N CL N N a- N N N W N LL Co 2 m 2 m 2 m CD Z 2 m Z LL m O— M > 0 V O O o L :3 C L Co m .0 m C •a L (U a) 7 c Ed oho r o o 3m o cEm Ecco 0 Q.O o 0 0 In w v 0 a) o C o - c o r-• N trz d W Lo O O M L° 7L U 0)a) ° U m� 0 075 E O 3 O 3 U Q =o c 'Fu L a) c c ° o ° o° \ \ o iaCo ccoc..mc E d ado o � 3 Co o c E m C E m o 0- {�tr_ � G o O o Q O O d! p (D Y O w p b ) O .O p° O a) O N Z W Cf) L o.+ O U 7 O D1 a) o a) E U 3 U L L O N y o a) 0)- 0 O O O C L N 3 a) - > ��� 0 3 0 0 3 �; ° O c o c c m .O •u) o a) L �O .- c C o -p o c c : ''O (n ° 0 a? ?' C to :r ° 0 3 w a) '6 .a a) m p 3 3 -p a) N co �- a) 'o E c .� U p m 0°> ° Eo - c o o m 3`o)�3:3cn"0co0 c o o - 70E._ w cb 00 3 0 Amo E " O C m a) a)-0 °-EEm m o o. 57a)a)E6-a)a)—cc -ia oaw iow a`) c � 3 3 2>tcn m0 � °) o c O co) me T) -r -r w E •co � °_ >. �a)a)o cp3�,co3°�'-0 r- c ��oa a) —0 C_ Ln m� mE ami�>v a C�o�C�>,3>, co c0>.•° ° a) a)o v� ay so 2 o__ L :3 CL m '0 0 8 0'o m p u) E cn o = p p U) d 3 �_ O "6 m m a) a) -0 - m to o U _m Y y Lw a) 0 :C O p >+ C.) U c cn p 7 c in p> �n � o p C E cn E T N C@ M O � o 3 � cL ; 0 cpm a) °'cam j a)i N d C d W O LL 0- C C m Z F- C N a 2 m L cc 0 J N d c6 Y r,- N N r N r N 0 0-0n a a a y co CN 0 0 0 0 2 co LL LL LL LL > V o o 0 E of 0 0 Q 9) a0 O .o'g c Z H W M O M LO L > u o o 3 o °c Ed rn o0 Yc c o O LO cn co V o o 3�� c, n n o 0 Z W O ch co M c Uo U U') 0-0- O M co M � � O O O N '0 U E :r a) .O C > O O C C U U (D.- .0 Y (1) O 0- 0 c O E° a) •0 c N y-0 L 0 O) m. O a) cn Co 0 a) a) (� 3 rn L — > > ° O L c m c°.i O c.) m j +••' m >, C Y a) a) O U i C L U :.. C' m 0 0 Y tr- O O C Y Oa —co C 2 U o -- w C 7 a) co co 0) c 0ami 3 O °ma)°'am 0) -`i O . !n (6 CO O a) c6 o (o U a) !n Y 0 X (o c0 n 0 m (6 C N U) C C 0) +r (o O c .O O O co N E O .a N o.0 Q > c6 (`6 O` C 3 U Q _ _ CN @ O c �cn.8 >,u: co cn mm °�' a) m U 3 w'�w O +'� cQ =3 LL Co"L vi cn E CL ° cu o a) U c� m a? E m0 U- owLL w°)a�'ic6� c- _ E ° n"� �E-0>C: M y o >, co ate) 3 -00 a) a) a) O °) 0 °c ami +a) D L Cn E > C C Y L co 0 L c ���ornw cu co mco C c @3d0 U m� (c m �o 00 a�io.SE > @ y 7C c co - EDo c '0 "' 7 U) 0-0 0 0-0• to 0 .� - co Q O 0 cn co m O O 0 O .a) U-0 pj co c C L C- O m a) N ` CN -0 (n E N O O N C O >+ a) ' 0 cu m U U a U C cn >O 0' f`6 y Q) LLL a) cn E y n fl..c a) a 0) U- . a) °� � o Y Y c cL c m N O co >,co-0 N •p m0 o> c -0 (`6 i 0 Co co O O C C o O 0 O L LL co U co m E g N O Q 'en = w Q (n U m Z - Z -:!:-C fn .0 co m 0 7 �c o 0 c a m a) a) O�C° x a) E Q)> m a) y c L m cn O_ ON _ a) a. co Save Our Indian River Lagoon Project Plan 2018 Update, April 2018 Due to the importance of treating dry season baseflow to the lagoon, Brevard County has found that ditch denitrification is the most cost-effective BMP. BAM can be added in existing BMPs or to new BMPs to improve the nutrient removal efficiency. The removal efficiencies of using BAM in various stormwater treatment projects (Wanielista 2015) are summarized in Table 30. Table 30: TN and TP Removal Efficiencies for BAM Location in BMP Treatment Train Material TN Removal TP Removal Cost/IN TP Reductions Efficiency Efficient Bold & Gold as a first BMP, ex. Up -flow filter in Expanded Clay lbs/ r(lbs/yr)of of TN baffle box and a constructed wetland Tire Chips 55% 65% Bold & Gold in up -flow filter at wet pond and dry Organics $96 6,896 basin outflow Tire Chips o 45% 0 45 /o 52,936 Expanded Clay 7,632 $635 Bold & Gold in inter -event flow using up -flow Expanded Clay $900,000 11,709 filter at wet pond and down -flow filter at dry basin Tire Chips 25% 25% Bold & Gold down -flow filters 12" depth at wet Clay pond or dry basin pervious pavement, tree well, Tire Crumb 60% 90% rain garden, swale, and strips Sand & To soil Note: From Wanielista 2015 The County's proposed TMDLs include two components: (1) a TMDL for the five-month period (January — May) that is critical for seagrass growth, and (2) a TMDL for the remaining seven months of the year to avoid algal blooms and protect healthy dissolved oxygen levels. The stormwater project benefits were estimated, as follows, to ensure both components of the TMDL are adequately addressed. The five-month TMDL covers the dry season in this area when there is minimal rainfall and stormwater runoff; therefore, the benefits of stormwater BAM projects during this period were based only on January — May baseflow loading estimates from the SWIL model. The estimated project treatment efficiencies used for January to May are 55% for TN and 65% for TP. For the remaining seven months, the baseflow and stormwater loading estimates from the SWIL model were used with a project efficiency of 45% for TN and 45% for TP. The estimated TN and TP reductions accomplished by using BAM upstream of these priority outfalls are summarized in Table 31, as well as the estimated cost per pound of TN or TP removed. A detailed list of stormwater projects is included in Appendix D. The locations of the basins to be treated are shown in Figure 15, Figure 16, and Figure 17. Table 31: Estimated TN and TP Reductions and Costs for BAM Projects Sub -lagoon Number of Estimated Total Project TN Reductions Cost/IN TP Reductions Cost/Ib/yr Basins Cost lbs/ r(lbs/yr)of of TN TP Banana River Lagoon 41 $4,625,000 48,391 $96 6,896 $671 North IRL 37 $4,850,000 52,936 $92 7,632 $635 CentrallRL 4 $900,000 11,709 $77 1,774 $507 Note: The projects highlighted in green are the most cost-effective and are recommended as part of this plan. Prepared by Tetra Tech, Inc. and C/osewaters, LLC 2"A6 Save Our Indian River Lagoon Project Plan 2018 Update, April 2018 411 Basins Preliminarily Selected forTreatment `►CE Q BaenalloSahueu � 'T .. � „�%•�• JCKEBAIJiM O cz m � Z IRL_seaion, Basin Num ea esa 9ARTON7, . D > 'r < MIN wxn ia� � l 0 1.25 2+5 5TI • EN Figure 15: Map of Selected Stormwater Projects in Banana River Lagoon and North IRL Prepared by Tetra Tech, Inc. and Closewaters, LLC 2W Save Our Indian River Lagoon Project Plan 2018 Update, April 2018 Figure 16: Map of Selected Stormwater Projects in Banana River Lagoon and North IRL, continued Prepared by Tetra Tech, Inc. and Closewaters, LLC 27S Save Our Indian River Lagoon Project Plan 2018 Update, April 2018 Y _ N _ e 6ARNEa' P x p g.Q r5 0 1.25 2.5 r.momm=Miles '9. Brevard g c o u N T• -T' C Nah"l Rasa—r l r rMna9--t iR� a `� � UKE WAKR�NGTON Nx MIRORA~ 'l p i I y �F PO 1 NARA �6.4 j 3v r �� 1 (`3 n®lacus-'✓ E Iwd EaER -�3, ����TPALe. aAY b.•i��¢' - .VPITER u � I � V., fOR,NT (y - i �y Basins Preliminarily Selected for Treatment 1 �� r i-1 Ka+oelax rae,oe> im✓ro��i.i u �'� fT tiu 5.`r'�- fT ti , RL_Se fio, Basin Num, PraJYur &nzna y _ aRL [ ♦ 'l MRL Figure 17: Map of Selected Stormwater Projects in North IRL and Central IRL Prepared by Tetra Tech, Inc. and Closewaters, LLC Save Our Indian River Lagoon Project Plan 2018 Update, April 2018 4.1.6 Surface Water Remediation System AquaFiber Technologies Corporation has a technology that would treat up to 25 cubic feet per second (16 mgd) of water from Turkey Creek, which is a major tributary to the Central IRL. This project would reduce total suspended solids by more than 90%, remove algal blooms and cyanobacteria to improve the lagoon's color and clarity, improve the dissolved oxygen concentration by returning water with near 100% oxygen saturation, and produce a biomass that can be processed into fertilizer pellets or used as a feedstock for waste -to -energy utilities to produce electricity. This project would remove an estimated 35,633 lbs/yr of TN and 2,132 lbs/yr of TP from the watershed. The facility would cost $19,720,760 for design, permitting, construction, and use of a technology to destroy the biomass onsite. The cost to operate and maintain the remediation facility is estimated to be $6,271,200 per year. Table 32 summarizes the benefits and the costs of nutrient removal for this project for a 10 -year period. On an annual basis, the yearly costs would be $8,243,276, which would result in a cost/lb/yr of TN removed of $231 and cost/Ib/yr of TP removed of $3,867. Table 32: Summary of Benefits and Costs of Central IRL Surface Water Remediation System Project Cost TN Reduction TP Reduction Cost/Ib/yr of TN Cost/Ib/yr of TP (lbs/r lbs/ r Removed Removed $82,432,760 35,633 2,132 $2,313 $38,665 The cost of nutrient removal via this technology is higher than the cost per pound removed for the other projects recommended in this plan; therefore, this remediation system is not recommended in the first iteration of this plan. However, this technology offers significant additional benefits that should be more thoroughly explored to better assess its total value to restoring and maintaining lagoon health. 4.2. Projects to Remove Pollutants The projects in this section will be implemented to remove pollutants that have accumulated in the lagoon. Brevard County has already begun to remove deep accumulations of muck from the lagoon bottom, and dredging to remove muck in other locations of the lagoon will continue. In addition, SJRWMD is evaluating opportunities for artificial flushing projects, which will allow additional water to flow into the lagoon system to flush out the built-up sediments and muck. These muck removal projects have more immediate benefits on the lagoon water quality than external reduction projects because the nutrient flux is reduced as soon as muck is dredged or flushed from the system whereas it takes time for the external load reduction benefits to reach the lagoon. The following sections describe the County's proposed muck removal projects, as well as SJRWMD's research into artificial flushing projects. The artificial flushing projects are not proposed for inclusion in this funding plan. Prepared by Tetra Tech, Inc. and Closewaters, LLC 2M Save Our Indian River Lagoon Project Plan 2018 Update, April 2018 4.2.9 Muck Removal — — - -- -_- -- � -- -- I The muck in the lagoon increases turbidity, inhibits seagrass Muck flux contributes growth, promotes oxygen depletion in sediments and the 1, 282, 000 lbs/yr of TN and water above, stores and releases nutrients, covers the natural 192,400 lbs/yr of TP to the bottom, and destroys healthy communities of benthic lagoon. organisms (Trefry 2013). When muck is suspended within the - water column due to wind or human activities such as boating, these suspended solids limit light availability and suppress seagrass growth. Even for deeper water areas without seagrass growth, muck remains a nutrient source that potentially affects a broader area of the lagoon through nutrient flux and resuspension of fine sediments and their subsequent transport. As shown in Figure 4, the annual release of nutrients from decaying muck is almost as much as the annual external loading delivered by stormwater and groundwater baseflow combined. The muck deposits cover an estimated 15,900 acres of the lagoon system bottom in Brevard County (Trefry 2016). The muck deposits in the lagoon flux nutrients that enter the water column and contribute to algal blooms and growth of macroalgae. Muck flux rates for nitrogen and phosphorus have been estimated through studies in the IRL system. For this plan, the flux rates used are 89 pounds of TN/yr/acre and 13.4 pounds of TP/yr/acre (Trefry 2016). The focus of the muck removal projects for this plan was on large deposits of muck in big, open water sites within the lagoon itself. Several of the main canals that directly connect to the lagoon are also included for muck removal. The goal of the muck removal is to reduce TN and TP muck flux loads by 25%, which should result in a significant improvement in water quality and seagrass extent, as well as a reduced risk of massive algal blooms and fish kills. A 70% efficiency for muck removal projects was applied. This efficiency accounts for two factors: (1) each target dredge area has less than 100% muck cover, and (2) some pockets of muck within dredged areas will inevitably be left behind regardless of the dredge technology used. Based on a 25% target reduction and 70% efficiency for dredging, the muck area reduction targets for this plan were established as shown in Table 33. Table 33: Muck Acreage in the IRL S stem Muck Reduction Targets Open Banana Banana River North Central Mosquito River Lagoon Lagoon Canals IRL IRL Lagoon Muck area acres 4,646 474 7,364 1,853 1,582 Area to reduce flux by 25% acres 1,161 119 1,841 465 395 Area dredged to reduce flux by 25% 1,656 173 2,619 667 565 with 70% project efficiency acres The costs for the proposed muck dredging projects are shown in Table 34 for the Mosquito Lagoon, Table 35 for the North IRL, Table 36 for the Banana River Lagoon, and Table 37. The locations of these projects are shown in Figure 18 and Figure 19. Using the flux rates noted in Section 4.2.1, the estimated TN and TP reductions that can be achieved from removing the muck, as well as the cost per pound of nutrient removed, were determined (see Table 38). Table 34: Mosquito Lagoon Estimated Costs for the Proposed Muck Removal Projects Note: The projects highlighted in green are the most cost-effective and are recommended as part of this plan. Prepared by Tetra Tech, Inc. and Closewaters, LLC Dredge Area Muck Volume Dredging Cost Location acres cubic ards Estimate Near Haulover Canal 398 1 460,000 $16,100,000 Note: The projects highlighted in green are the most cost-effective and are recommended as part of this plan. Prepared by Tetra Tech, Inc. and Closewaters, LLC Note: The p Save Our Indian River Lagoon Project Plan 2018 Update, April 2018 able 35: North IRL Estimated Costs for Pro osed Muck Removal Project Location Dredge Area acres Muck Volume cubicyards) Dredging Cost Estimate Titusville Area 528 650,000 $22,750,000 Cocoa Area 288 400,000 $14,000,000 Rockledge Area 81 100,000 $3,500,000 Eau Gallie Area 750 650,000 $22,750,000 Venetian Canals/Channels 11 50,000 $1,750,000 North !RL Total 1,658 1,850,000 $64,750,000 roiects hiahliahted in preen are the most cost-effective and are recommended as Dart of this D Ian. Table 36: Banana River Lagoon Estimated Costs for the Proposed Muck Removal Projects Location Dredge Area acres Muck Volume (cubic yards) Dredging Cost Estimate Cape Canaveral Area 865 750,000 $26,250,000 Cocoa Beach Area 1243 1,150,000 $40,250,000 Newfound Harbor Area 245 225,000 $7,875,000 Pineda Causeway Area 163 150,000 $5,250,000 Mathers Bridge Area 190 175,000 $6,125,000 Venetian Canals/Channels 213 750,000 $26,250,000 Banana River Total 2,918 3,200,000 $112,000,000 Note: The projects highlighted in green are the most cost-effective and are recommended as part of this plan. Table 37: Central IRL Estimated Costs for the Proposed Muck Removal Proiects Location Dredge Area acres Muck Volume cubicyards) Dredging Cost Estimate Melbourne Causeway Area 15 20,000 $700,000 Goat Creek Area 5 5,000 $175,000 Trout Creek Area 5 5,000 $175,000 Mullet Creek Islands Area 76 70,000 $2,450,000 Venetian Canals/Channels 11 1 50,000 $1,750,000 Central IRL Total 1131 150,000 $5,250,000 Note: The projects highlighted in green are the most cost-effective and are recommended as part of this plan. Table 38: Nitrogen and Phosphorus Reductions from Muck Removal Location Project Cost TN Flux Reduction (lbs/r Cost/lb/yr of TN Removed TP Flux Reduction (lbs/r Cost/lb/yr of TP Removed Mosquito Lagoon $16,100,000 35,000 $460 5,250 $3,067 North IRL $64,750,000 147,913 $438 22,220 $2,914 Banana River Lagoon $112,000,000 1 260,315 $430 39,106 $2,864 Central IRL $5,250,000 1 10,052 1 $522 1,510 $3,477 Note: The projects highlighted in green are the most cost-effective and are recommended as part of this plan. As dredging proceeds, upland input of muck components must be reduced to prevent new muck accumulation. Therefore, land-based source control measures for nutrients, organic waste, and erosion are needed. Without source controls, muck removal will need to be frequently repeated, which is neither cost-effective nor beneficial to the lagoon's health. Public awareness and commitment is needed to control future muck accumulation. Activities that contribute organic debris and sediment to stormwater and open water must be curtailed. Additional scientific assessment should be carried out to evaluate and optimize the dredging process. Prepared by Tetra Tech, Inc. and Closewaters, LLC Save Our Indian River Lagoon Project Plan 2018 Update, April 2018 0 2a 5 10t_'Y. Cocoa Beach Area 1,1501000 cy Pineda Causeway Area 150,000 cy Note: Map is from SJRWMD for informational purposes only and is based on data from 2014. Annotation of project areas by County staff working with muck research scientists. Figure 18: Location of Potential Muck Removal Projects in Mosquito Lagoon, Banana River Lagoon, and North IRL Prepared by Tetra Tech, Inc. and Closewaters, LLC 283 Save Our Indian River Lagoon Project Plan 2018 Update, April 2018 01 CY Note: Map is from SJRWMD for informational purposes only and is based on data from 2014. Annotation of project areas by County staff working with muck research scientists. Figure 19: Location of Potential Muck Removal Projects in North IRL and Central IRL Prepared by Tetra Tech, Inc. and Closewaters, LLC I Save Our Indian River Lagoon Project Plan 2018 Update, April 2018 Treatment of Muck Interstitial Water (added in 2018) Interstitial water refers to the water content that is present within the muck material. Sampling and testing conducted by Florida Institute of Technology researchers has shown that the majority of nutrients are bound to solid particles in the muck; however, the interstitial water also contains a significant amount of dissolved nutrients. When the muck material is dredged, interstitial water nutrients are pumped with the muck and lagoon water in a slurry to the dredged material management area (DMMA). At the DMMA, the muck slurry is processed in a settling pond where sediments settle out and overflow water is returned to the IRL. Treatment of this overflow water represents a significant opportunity to prevent return of these nutrients to the IRL. Working with the dredging industry, sewage treatment industry, stormwater treatment entrepreneurs and industrial waste treatment engineers, feasible and reasonably cost-effective concentration targets for return water to the IRL have been identified as 2,000-3,000 parts per billion (ppb) for TN and 75-100 ppb for TP. Treatment options were demonstrated during the state -funded initial dredging of Turkey Creek, with Florida Institute of Technology researchers providing independent third -party verification of performance levels. These targets can be achieved through a variety of technologies including, but not limited to, coagulants, polymers, BAM, or a combination of these technologies. Costs associated with these technologies vary by technology, target nutrient reduction levels, and interstitial nutrient concentrations. Open market costs were collected through two bid solicitations: (1) Mims Boat Ramp muck removal project and (2) Sykes Creek muck removal project. To encourage partnering entities and applicants for Save Our Indian River Lagoon Trust Fund dollars to take advantage of this opportunity to enhance the performance of muck removal projects by removing interstitial water nutrients from the dredge slurry during muck dredging operations whenever project configuration allows, a separate cost -share has been developed to account for this added cost and associated nutrient reduction benefit. Using available cost information from Turkey Creek, Mims, and Sykes Creek, County staff considered how to incentivize the addition of this processing step as soon as possible into permitted muck removal projects, as well as future projects. Staff estimated that a cost -share of $175/lb of TN removed would be sufficient to entice most partners to agree to stipulate a specific condition in their bids and dredging contracts that return water not exceed 3,000 ppb of TN nor 100 ppb of TP. The cost - share of $175/lb of TN is also,within the range of costs provided for nutrient mitigation alternatives for sediment dewatering for Turkey Creek (Tetra Tech 2015). 4.2.2 Artificial Flushing The 2011 superbloom occurred in the Banana River Lagoon, North IRL, and southern Mosquito Lagoon. These areas have long residence times, which means that water in these areas is not flushed out often and nutrients can build up leading to additional algal blooms. One option to help this condition is to increase the flushing by adding culverts or inlets to provide new connections to the ocean or within the IRL system to artificially increase flushing. However, artificial flushing projects have a lot of unknowns. While the flushing of the IRL system increases, the input of additional saltwater has the potential to affect the lagoon ecosystem. The amount of flushing needed to have a beneficial impact on the system without causing harm is also unknown. These projects are costly with permitting hurdles that must be overcome. For these reasons, artificial flushing projects are not a recommended component of this plan. However, this type of project is a potential option for restoring the lagoon and SJRWMD is taking the lead on evaluating options. The results of their evaluation to date are summarized below. Prepared by Tetra Tech, Inc. and Closewaters, LLC 295 Save Our Indian River Lagoon Project Plan 2018 Update, April 2018 SJRWMD contracted with CDM Smith and Taylor Engineering to identify potential locations where artificial flushing projects would be beneficial. The first phase of the project (CDM Smith et. al., 2014) involved a literature review and Geographic Information System (GIS) desktop analysis. All of the locations considered in Phase I, including the top ranked locations, are shown in Figure 20. From this first phase, ten locations were identified for future evaluation as shown in Table 39. The external projects are those that could potentially connect the IRL system with the Atlantic Ocean whereas internal projects are connections within the IRL (CDM Smith et. al., 2015). Prepared by Tetra Tech, Inc. and Closewaters, LLC Save Our Indian River Lagoon Project Plan 2018 Update, April 2018 t.. gra pace Cosst tpnlAirport m L.lLyri�l •19 20 19 • e 4 3 22s �. I ' • O 23� Legend SIRWMD Proposed Locations it y►�+�;< " t' Project Type { S` ° F O External Project(A-s) a ,+5: o • Intemal Project(a-d)9 CDM Smith Project Locations` Project Type;i O ExternalProject(1-il) • Internal Project (12-23) Q Study Areat"p@yr�i. 'Fc lJigitaEN VIMiM? Smith th I_ a jBanaraCrLek Intemal b Crawler Road Intemal c IHaulovercanal Intemal d Etarge Canal Intemal CDM Smith Additional locations 1 Port Canaveral (East)Fxtemal 2 Cocoa Beach CausewayFxtemal 3 IMinutpmenCausewav I External 7 IJames Nance Park External 8 1 Coconut Point Park External 9 IRL South External 17 IWnritt Island Walmart Intemal . 18 Summers Creek Merritlsland Internal 19 1 Riverpoint Program center Intemal 20 IMinuternanCausewav Intemal 16 ■ Miles Phase I Project Locations Source: CDM Smith et. al., 2015. Figure 20: Phase I Potential Artificial Flushing Project Locations Prepared by Tetra Tech, Inc. and Closewaters, LLC Save Our Indian River Lagoon Project Plan 2018 Update, April 2018 Table 39: Phase I Top Ranked Potential Artificial Flushinq Project Locations Project Site ID Project Description Zone Project T e Rank D Canaveral Lock* Banana River Lagoon External 1 C . Port Canaveral* Banana River Lagoon External 2 15 Sykes Creek/Merritt Island Causeway* Banana River Lagoon Internal 3 B Pad 39-A* Banana River Lagoon External 4 16 Cocoa Beach Causeway Banana River Lagoon Internal 5 23 South Banana River Banana River Lagoon Internal 6 E Patrick AFB* Banana River Lagoon External 7 20 Minuteman Causeway Banana River Lagoon Internal 8 1 Port Canaveral East Banana River Lagoon External 9 8 Coconut Point Park* Central and Southern Portion of IRL Study Area External 10 Source: CDM Smith et. al., 2015. * Sites evaluated in Phase 2 of the CDM Smith and Taylor Engineering project for SJRWMD. As part of the second phase of the project, six of the top ranked sites were further evaluated to assess the flushing volumes. These sites are noted in Table 39. Based on the initial evaluation of the sites, CDM Smith and Taylor Engineering determined that a project at the Sykes Creek/Merritt Island Causeway was not feasible. This location had a relatively new bridge crossing with built-up abutment protection that precludes construction of culverts and the increase of bridge openings. In addition, this connection would only provide an internal connection in the IRL and would not increase the tidal exchange. The five remaining sites were evaluated for the following types of connections (additional information in Table 40): • Port Canaveral (Project Site C) — Culvert connection • Pad 39-A (Project Site B) — Culvert connection • Patrick AFB (Project Site E) — Culvert connection • Canaveral Lock (Project Site D) — Open channel flow by keeping the Canaveral Lock open over extended periods. Additional maintenance dredging may be needed to remove sediment deposition near the gates. • Coconut Point Park (Project Site 8) — Culvert connection • Coconut Point Park (Project Site 8) — Inlet connection with an inlet that is at least 1,350 - feet long, with an average depth of about 25 feet below mean sea level. Prepared by Tetra Tech, Inc. and Closewaters, LLC Save Our Indian River Lagoon Project Plan 2018 Update, April 2018 Table 40: Computed Hydraulics for Connections at Select Locations Source: CDM Smith et. al., 2015. Note: Positive flow is towards the IRL. A screening matrix was used to evaluate the costs and benefits of the project based on the criteria for the tidal prism, area affected, land acquisition, relative costs, ease of construction, seagrass loss, and benefit to cost ratio. The top ranked project from this evaluation is the Port Canaveral culvert (CDM et. al., 2015). It is important to note that a culvert will likely not provide the amount of flushing needed to provide a significant benefit to the lagoon. The size of the lagoon in Brevard County is more than 150,000 acres. The second ranked project is the Canaveral Lock open channel. This option may have challenges moving forward based on past experience with sediment blocking submarines from using the port after the lock was held open for an extended period of time. In addition, there are limited data for estimating the water quality benefits and unintended ecological consequences that could result from keeping the lock open. Another potential option for adding flushing in the lagoon system is when a large storm creates an opening. Instead of immediately filling in the new opening, an evaluation should be completed using available flushing models to determine the potential benefits of temporarily stabilizing the opening long enough to provide significant ocean exchange for short-term water quality benefits, but not long enough to excessively alter beach erosion and sand transport into the lagoon. 4.3. Projects to Restore the Lagoon Another component of this plan is to implement projects that will restore important, filtering ecosystem services within and adjacent to the lagoon to improve water quality and resilience. Creating oyster reefs and living shorelines made up of oysters and natural vegetation will help to filter excess nutrients and suspended solids from the lagoon, which will improve water quality, allowing for seagrass growth and reducing the number and severity of algal blooms in the lagoon system. Oyster reefs and living shorelines also create habitat for more than 300 different lagoon species. These types of projects take a few years before the full benefits are seen in the lagoon as it takes some time for the oysters and vegetation to grow and become established. As water quality improves, oysters will filter a greater volume annually, increasing natural resilience to extreme events and algal blooms. The sections below summarize the oyster restoration and living shoreline projects that are proposed, as well as considerations for seagrass planting. Prepared by Tetra Tech, Inc. and C/osewaters, LLC 288 Flood Prism Ebb Prism Maximum Estimated Impacted Site/Potential Project (million (million Flow (cfs) Area for 0.27 ft Tide cubic ft cubic ft Range acres Port Canaveral Culvert (Project 1.51 -1.08 89 92 to 128 Site C Pad 39-A Culvert (Project Site B) 1.38 to 1.51 -1.08 to -1.59 N/A 92 to 135 estimated Patrick AFB Culvert (Project Site 1.38 to 1.51 -1.08 to -1.59 N/A 92 to 135 E) (estimated Canaveral Lock Open Channel 68.67 -83.03 -4,670 5,839 to 7,060 Flow Project Site D Coconut Point Park Culvert 1.38 -1.59 -94 117 to 135 Project Site 8 Coconut Point Park Inlet (Project 1,890 N/A 111,000 160,698 Site 8 Source: CDM Smith et. al., 2015. Note: Positive flow is towards the IRL. A screening matrix was used to evaluate the costs and benefits of the project based on the criteria for the tidal prism, area affected, land acquisition, relative costs, ease of construction, seagrass loss, and benefit to cost ratio. The top ranked project from this evaluation is the Port Canaveral culvert (CDM et. al., 2015). It is important to note that a culvert will likely not provide the amount of flushing needed to provide a significant benefit to the lagoon. The size of the lagoon in Brevard County is more than 150,000 acres. The second ranked project is the Canaveral Lock open channel. This option may have challenges moving forward based on past experience with sediment blocking submarines from using the port after the lock was held open for an extended period of time. In addition, there are limited data for estimating the water quality benefits and unintended ecological consequences that could result from keeping the lock open. Another potential option for adding flushing in the lagoon system is when a large storm creates an opening. Instead of immediately filling in the new opening, an evaluation should be completed using available flushing models to determine the potential benefits of temporarily stabilizing the opening long enough to provide significant ocean exchange for short-term water quality benefits, but not long enough to excessively alter beach erosion and sand transport into the lagoon. 4.3. Projects to Restore the Lagoon Another component of this plan is to implement projects that will restore important, filtering ecosystem services within and adjacent to the lagoon to improve water quality and resilience. Creating oyster reefs and living shorelines made up of oysters and natural vegetation will help to filter excess nutrients and suspended solids from the lagoon, which will improve water quality, allowing for seagrass growth and reducing the number and severity of algal blooms in the lagoon system. Oyster reefs and living shorelines also create habitat for more than 300 different lagoon species. These types of projects take a few years before the full benefits are seen in the lagoon as it takes some time for the oysters and vegetation to grow and become established. As water quality improves, oysters will filter a greater volume annually, increasing natural resilience to extreme events and algal blooms. The sections below summarize the oyster restoration and living shoreline projects that are proposed, as well as considerations for seagrass planting. Prepared by Tetra Tech, Inc. and C/osewaters, LLC 288 Save Our Indian River Lagoon Project Plan 2018 Update, April 2018 4.3.1 Oyster Restoration In addition to the fisheries value of oysters, they provide a - variety of nonmarket ecosystem services. Restored oyster The primary mechanism by 'I reefs have been shown to result in a positive net effect on which oyster reefs remove the removal and sequestration of nitrogen compared to nitrogen is by increasing unrestored sites. As nitrogen is a major contributor to algal (Ylocal denitrification rates. i blooms and turbidity, removal of nitrogen from the system often yields water quality benefits. The nitrogen is removed through three pathways: (1) assimilation of the nitrogen in the shell and tissues of the oysters, (2) enhanced burial of nitrogen into the sediments surrounding oyster reefs, and (3) conversion to gaseous form with return to the atmosphere through microbe -related denitrification (zu Ermgassen 2016). The primary mechanism by which oyster reefs remove nitrogen from the system is by increasing local denitrification rates (Grabowski et. al. 2012). While oyster reefs have a relatively small impact on average nutrient concentrations for an entire waterbody, their local impact may be much larger. For example, in a study by Kroeger (2012), it was noted that the eastern section of Mobile Bay had experienced harmful algal blooms that caused fish kills. These conditions occur in the summer months when denitrification by restored oysters would be highest. Therefore, the nitrogen removal associated with the oyster reef project in the bay may make a noticeable contribution to the local water quality by avoiding peak nitrogen concentrations that may trigger algal blooms. In a study by Kellogg et. al. (2013), the denitrification rates associated with oyster reefs from various studies were documented. Based on these studies, the average effect of denitrification rate is 291 Nmol N/m2/hr, which equates to 0.04 lbs N/m2/yr (161.9 lbs N/ac/yr). A more recent study was conducted in the Mosquito Lagoon to determine the local benefits from oyster bed restoration. This study found that the average denitrification rate and measured nitrogen sequestration in oyster tissues and shells is 0.04 lbs of TN/square foot (Schmidt and Gallagher 2017). The focus for oyster restoration in the IRL system is to provide filtration, sequestration, denitrification, and scour protection along the shoreline (see Section 4.3.2 for details on scour protection). The goal is not to restore historic oyster reefs in the system because information is not available on where oyster reefs were historically located. In addition, large-scale reefs would compete for space with seagrass, and seagrass are a more critical component of the system. Therefore, the reefs that will be constructed will be shaped as narrow bars and placed along the shoreline, shallower than the typical depths for seagrass, to act as a living wave break along the shoreline. The benefits of oyster reefs as a living shoreline are shown in Section 4.3.2. Most of the IRL system in Brevard County no longer has a sufficient oyster population to allow for natural recruitment of oysters to suitable substrate. Therefore, to create the oyster reefs, the oysters must be grown and then carefully placed on appropriate substrate in the selected locations. To help grow the oyster population, in FY2013-2014, the Board of County Commissioners approved $150,000 to launch the Oyster Gardening Program. This program is a citizen -based oyster propagation program where juvenile oysters are raised under lagoon -front homeowners' docks and eventually used to populate constructed oyster reef sites. Oyster Gardening participants receive spat -on -shell oysters plus all supplies needed to care for their oysters until six to nine months later when they are placed at new reef sites in the lagoon. The Oyster Gardening Program is executed in partnership with the Brevard Zoo. The project continued during FY2014-2015 with funding from the state and in FY2015-2016 with funding from the County. The County plans to continue funding this program annually. Prepared by Tetra Tech, Inc. and Closewaters, LLC Save Our Indian River Lagoon Project Plan 2018 Update, April 2018 The oysters from the Oyster Gardening Program have been used to develop several pilot reefs and demonstration sites in the IRL. In FY 2014-2015, the County received a $410,000 appropriation from the Florida Legislature for the Indian River Lagoon Oyster Restoration Project. This pilot study was completed in fall 2016. The design of oyster wave breaks funded by the Save Our Indian River Lagoon tax is based on monitoring results from the pilot reefs and wave tank studies at Florida Institute of Technology that tested the reef stability and wave attenuation of different designs. 4.3.2 Living Shorelines Typically, efforts to protect shorelines have involved hardened structures, such as seawalls, rock revetments, or bulkheads, to dampen or reflect wave energy. Although these types of structures may mitigate shoreline retreat, they accelerate scour and the ecological damages that result can be great (Scyphers et. al. 2011). The living shoreline approach incorporates natural habitats into a shoreline stabilization design; maintains the connectivity between aquatic, intertidal, and terrestrial habitats; and minimizes the adverse impacts of shoreline stabilization on the estuarine system. These efforts range from maintaining or transplanting natural shoreline vegetation without additional structural components to incorporating shoreline vegetation with hardened features, such as rock sills or oyster bars, in settings with higher wave energy (Currin et. al. 2010). Selection of the most appropriate management system begins with a site analysis to evaluate the type of shoreline, amount of energy that a shoreline experiences, sediment transport forces, type and location of ecological resources, and adjacent land uses (Restore America's Estuaries 2015). Oyster reefs can function as natural breakwaters, in addition to providing nutrient removal benefits through denitrification, as noted in Section 4.3.1. The rate of vertical oyster reef growth on unharvested reefs is far greater than any predicted sea -level rise rate; therefore, reefs could serve as natural protection against shoreline erosion, intertidal habitat loss, and property damage and loss along many estuarine shorelines. Oyster reefs reduce erosion of other estuarine habitats such as salt marshes and submerged aquatic vegetation by serving as a living breakwater that attenuates wave energy and stabilizes sediments (Grabowski et. al. 2012). As part of a study for the Chesapeake Bay, Forand et. al. (2014) evaluated the pollutant load reductions from living shoreline projects in the area. The results of this evaluation are shown in Table 41, and were used to update the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Chesapeake Bay Program Office (CBPO) estimate of the TN and TP reductions per foot of living shoreline. It is important to note that the information in this table is from states up north where temperatures become much cooler for longer periods of time than what occurs in Brevard County. Therefore, the benefits associated with vegetated living shorelines in the IRL system will likely be greater than those estimated here. Prepared by Tetra Tech, Inc. and Closewaters, LLC Save Our Indian River Lagoon Project Plan 2018 Update, April 2018 Table 41: Pollutant Load Reductions for Shoreline Management Practices Source Total TP Study Location Cost IbTN r lb/ft/yr Project (bison, 1990 1.65 1.27 Virginia (bison, 1992 0.81 0.66 Virginia Proctor, 2012 N/A 0.38 or 0.29 Virginia MDE, 2011 0.16 0.11 Maryland Baltimore County mean 0.27 0.18 Maryland Forand, 2013 CBPO Scenario Builder 002 00025 CBP policy threshold that comes from one CBP, 2012 .. stream restoration site in Maryland New Interim CBPO Rate 0.20 0.068 CBPO policy thresholds that comes (Expert Panel, 2013 from six stream restoration sites Note: Table is from Forand et. al. 2014. Brevard County In order to create enough oyster reef area to filter the volume of lagoon water annually, approximately 20 miles (105,600 feet) of oyster reef living shoreline is needed with a width of 6 feet. These reefs will be placed throughout the IRL system along mosquito impoundments, parks, and private properties where owners want to participate. Based on the pilot project costs and knowing that larger reefs will be constructed more efficiently (using information from the pilot projects), it is estimated that the 20 miles of living shoreline could be constructed at a cost of $10 million. The resulting reefs would provide a reduction of 21,120 lbs/yr of TN and 7,181 lbs/yr of TP (see Table 42). Table 42: Initial Estimated O ster Reef Living Shoreline TN and TP Reductions and Costs Note: The projects highlighted in green are the most cost-effective and are recommended as part of this plan. With the recent study on oyster reefs in the IRL system (Schmidt and Gallagher 2017), the benefits associated with oyster reefs versus vegetative living shorelines could be delineated. For the proposed oyster reef along 20 miles (105,600 feet) of shoreline with a width of 6 feet (total of 633,600 square feet of oyster reef, the estimated reductions are 25,539 lbs/yr of TN and 906 lbs/yr of TP (see Table 43). These estimates are based on the estimated TN reduction rate of 0.04 lbs of TN/square foot of oyster reef from Schmidt and Gallagher 2017 and the estimated TP reduction rate of 0.001 lbs of TP/square foot of oyster reef from Kellogg et. al. 2013. Table 43: 2018 Updated Estimated Oyster Reef TN and TP Reductions and Costs Total TN TP Cost Cost/Ib/yr Costllb/yr Project Length Reductions Reductions Estimate of TN of TP feet (lbs/r (lbs/r Reduction Reduction Oyster reef living 105,600 21,120 7,181 $10,000,000 $473 $1,393 shorelines Note: The projects highlighted in green are the most cost-effective and are recommended as part of this plan. With the recent study on oyster reefs in the IRL system (Schmidt and Gallagher 2017), the benefits associated with oyster reefs versus vegetative living shorelines could be delineated. For the proposed oyster reef along 20 miles (105,600 feet) of shoreline with a width of 6 feet (total of 633,600 square feet of oyster reef, the estimated reductions are 25,539 lbs/yr of TN and 906 lbs/yr of TP (see Table 43). These estimates are based on the estimated TN reduction rate of 0.04 lbs of TN/square foot of oyster reef from Schmidt and Gallagher 2017 and the estimated TP reduction rate of 0.001 lbs of TP/square foot of oyster reef from Kellogg et. al. 2013. Table 43: 2018 Updated Estimated Oyster Reef TN and TP Reductions and Costs Note: The projects highlighted in green are the most cost-effective and are recommended as part of this plan. In addition, if 20 miles of shoreline (105,600 feet) were planted with native vegetation in living shorelines at a width of 8 feet (total of 844,800 square feet of living shoreline), the total estimated cost is $1,267,200 with a reduction of 7,040 lbs/yr of TN and 2,394 lbs/yr of TP (Table 44). The estimated nutrient reductions from vegetative shoreline buffers was calculated using Chesapeake Bay Program Office recommended rates of 0.02 lbs of TN/linear foot and 0.068 lbs of TP/linear Prepared by Tetra Tech, Inc. and Closewaters, LLC 292 Total Area Cost TN Cost/lb/yr TP Cost/lb/yr Project (square feet) Estimate Reductions of TN Reductions of TP (lbs/r Reduction (lbs/r Reduction Oyster reefs 633,600 $10,000,000 25,539 $392 906 $11,034 Note: The projects highlighted in green are the most cost-effective and are recommended as part of this plan. In addition, if 20 miles of shoreline (105,600 feet) were planted with native vegetation in living shorelines at a width of 8 feet (total of 844,800 square feet of living shoreline), the total estimated cost is $1,267,200 with a reduction of 7,040 lbs/yr of TN and 2,394 lbs/yr of TP (Table 44). The estimated nutrient reductions from vegetative shoreline buffers was calculated using Chesapeake Bay Program Office recommended rates of 0.02 lbs of TN/linear foot and 0.068 lbs of TP/linear Prepared by Tetra Tech, Inc. and Closewaters, LLC 292 Save Our Indian River Lagoon Project Plan 2018 Update, April 2018 foot (Forand et. al. 2014.), which is for an average planting width of 24 feet. These values were adjusted for the proposed average planting width of 8 feet to results in a reduction of 0.067 lbs of TN/linear foot and 0.023 lbs of TP/linear foot. Shoreline planting projects can be combined with oyster reef breakwater projects or they may be conducted along separate stretches of shoreline. Table 44: Estimated Vegetative Living Shoreline TN and TP Reductions and Costs Note: The projects highlighted in green are the most cost-effective and are recommended as part of this plan. The County conducted a survey of the shorelines, in conjunction with the University of Central Florida, to determine if the shoreline included a bulkhead/seawall, hardened slope/riprap, or no structure to help identify potential locations for future oyster reefs and vegetative living shorelines (Figure 21). Prepared by Tetra Tech, Inc. and Closewaters, LLC 293 Total Cost TN Cost/lb/yr TP Cost/Ib/yr Project Length Estimate Reductions of TN Reductions of TP feet Obs/r) Reduction (lbs/r Reduction Vegetative living shoreline 105,600 $1,267,200 7,040 $180 2,394 $529 Note: The projects highlighted in green are the most cost-effective and are recommended as part of this plan. The County conducted a survey of the shorelines, in conjunction with the University of Central Florida, to determine if the shoreline included a bulkhead/seawall, hardened slope/riprap, or no structure to help identify potential locations for future oyster reefs and vegetative living shorelines (Figure 21). Prepared by Tetra Tech, Inc. and Closewaters, LLC 293 Save Our Indian River Lagoon Project Plan 2018 Update, April 2018 r revard Shoreline Survey ! horeline_Edge Bulkhead/Seawall • M Hardened Slope/Riprap No Structure ' r t -_J4 it _ r `1r - Palm Bay 0 3 6 12 18 24 Miles Figure 21: Shoreline Survey to Identify Locations for Oyster Reefs and Living Shorelines Prepared by Tetra Tech, Inc. and Closewaters, LLC 294 Save Our Indian River Lagoon Project Plan 2018 Update, April 2018 4.3.3 Seagrass Planting (added in 2018) The original IRL Surface Water Improvement and Management Plan of 1989, as well as subsequent management plans up to and including the current BMAPs, target a healthy, estuarine ecosystem populated by seagrasses. Seagrasses provide crucial benefits to Florida's estuaries by providing food. and shelter to a variety of animals, improving water quality, and preventing erosion of sediment. In total, the lagoon's 72,000 acres of seagrass could provide an economic benefit of more than $900 million per year (Figure 22, Dewsbury et al. 2016). Economic value Direct grazing 4 turtles, manatees, fish, snails... d ? Coral reefs z Nursery --)' Commercial fisheries 4 recreation $4,600/ac/yr Carbon sequestration 4 CO2 reduction $262 /ac/yr /V/Zr Wave energy reduction Sediment stability -) improved viater quality ? Nutrient cycling and sequestration $7,695/ac/yr TOTAL > $22,457/ac/yr @72,400 acres in 2007 = > $902,000,000 Note: Adapted from Dewsbury et al. 2016 Figure 22: Estimated Economic Value of Some Seagrass Services One key ecological role for seagrasses is to absorb and cycle nitrogen and phosphorus. Seagrasses do not remove these nutrients permanently, but they compete for them against phytoplankton and macroalgae and hold them longer. By stabilizing the cycling of nutrients, seagrasses can increase a system's ability to absorb nutrient loads without the initiation of detrimental blooms of phytoplankton or macroalgae. The contribution of seagrasses can be evaluated by examining the quantity of nutrients bound in its aboveground and belowground structures (its mass of biological material or biomass), with this approach treating uptake and release of nutrients as offsetting components of the nutrient cycle (Table 45). Table 45: Average Nutrients in Seagrass from 1996-2009 Sub -Lagoon Acres Seagrass lbs/100 acres Nitrogen lbs/100 acres Phosphorus lbs/1.00 acres. Southern Mosquito Lagoon 14,000 45,000 1,000 100 Banana River Lagoon 21,000 45,000 1,000 100 North IRL 19,000 37,000 900 90 Central IRL 7,000 36,000 900 90 Seagrass restoration may be necessary because more than 30,000 acres of seagrasses were shaded to the point. of loss during the superbloom in 2011, recovery has been limited, and the brown tide in 2016 exacerbated the situation. In fact, the Banana River Lagoon in Brevard County experienced the largest initial losses of seagrass. Beyond the reduction in light arising from repeated, intense phytoplankton blooms, the absence of seagrasses has made the sediments Prepared by Tetra Tech, Inc. and Closewaters, LLC 295 Save Our Indian River Lagoon Project Plan 2018 Update, April 2018 less stable, which will hamper future colonization and spread. After the loss of seagrass, nitrogen and phosphorus became available to phytoplankton, drift algae, and other primary producers (Table 47). In summary, seagrasses may need some help to recover in the short-term, with more rapid recovery helping to stabilize nutrient cycling in the IRL and reducing the amount of nutrients available to phytoplankton. Measures that could help seagrasses recover could include protecting existing seagrass to promote expansion or protecting areas from waves to reduce the movement of sediment and allow seagrasses to colonize. Planting Halodule wrightii would be the initial focus because planting may accelerate recovery, as Halodule wrightii is the most common species in the lagoon (Dawes et al. 1995), and this species is a successful pioneer due to its relatively rapid growth and tolerance of varying conditions. Table 46: Table 46 from the Original Plan is Now Table 66 Note: Table 46 from the original Save Our Indian River Lagoon Project Plan is specifically named in the Save Our Indian River Lagoon Trust Fund Ordinance. Therefore, this table number is being reserved. The updated version of Table 46 from the original plan can be found in Table 66 of this update. Table 47: Average Seagrass Lost and Nutrients Made Available to Other Primary Producers in 2015 * Changes in seagrass cover yield changes in biomass of seagrass within the same number of acres. Planting seagrass is not a trivial undertaking; it requires considerable planning, resources, and time. For example, having suitable conditions is critical as shown in Tampa Bay where stakeholders invested more than $500 million in projects to reduce nutrient pollution before they saw any return from planting seagrass (Lewis et al. 1999). Costs documented during a workshop on seagrass restoration ranged upward of $1.4 million per acre for larger scale projects (Treat and Lewis 2006). Some of the lessons learned from past projects are selecting sites that will support seagrass growth, employing optimal methods for planting (e.g., type of planting units, use of chemicals to enhance growth, and density of initial planting), and protecting newly planted seagrass from disturbance (e.g., grazing, waves, exposure, and low salinity) until it is established. These factors must be tailored to a specific location; therefore, one or more robust pilot studies are needed prior to attempting full-scale seagrass restoration in the IRL. A proposed two-year pilot study would evaluate 10 acres of seagrass using three planting techniques with the goal of sequestering 80 lbs/yr of TN and 8 lbs/yr of TP. The costs for this pilot study are summarized in Table 48, and the three planting techniques that would be evaluated are shown in Figure 23. Similar or more complex pilot studies could be designed to investigate other key components of successful restoration. Overall, the success of planting of seagrass at the scale of tens of thousands of acres will benefit from strategic investment in optimizing techniques. Appendix E includes additional details about seagrass. Prepared by Tetra Tech, Inc. and Closewaters, LLC 296 Reduction Seagrass Nitrogen Phosphorus Sub -Lagoon in Acres Reduction* Reduction Reduction lbs/100 acres Ibs/100 acres) (Ibs/100 acres Southern Mosquito Lagoon 0 15,000 300 30 Banana River Lagoon 12,000 37,000 900 90 North IRL 1,000 8,000 200 20 Central IRL 4,000 20,000 500 50 * Changes in seagrass cover yield changes in biomass of seagrass within the same number of acres. Planting seagrass is not a trivial undertaking; it requires considerable planning, resources, and time. For example, having suitable conditions is critical as shown in Tampa Bay where stakeholders invested more than $500 million in projects to reduce nutrient pollution before they saw any return from planting seagrass (Lewis et al. 1999). Costs documented during a workshop on seagrass restoration ranged upward of $1.4 million per acre for larger scale projects (Treat and Lewis 2006). Some of the lessons learned from past projects are selecting sites that will support seagrass growth, employing optimal methods for planting (e.g., type of planting units, use of chemicals to enhance growth, and density of initial planting), and protecting newly planted seagrass from disturbance (e.g., grazing, waves, exposure, and low salinity) until it is established. These factors must be tailored to a specific location; therefore, one or more robust pilot studies are needed prior to attempting full-scale seagrass restoration in the IRL. A proposed two-year pilot study would evaluate 10 acres of seagrass using three planting techniques with the goal of sequestering 80 lbs/yr of TN and 8 lbs/yr of TP. The costs for this pilot study are summarized in Table 48, and the three planting techniques that would be evaluated are shown in Figure 23. Similar or more complex pilot studies could be designed to investigate other key components of successful restoration. Overall, the success of planting of seagrass at the scale of tens of thousands of acres will benefit from strategic investment in optimizing techniques. Appendix E includes additional details about seagrass. Prepared by Tetra Tech, Inc. and Closewaters, LLC 296 Save Our Indian River Lagoon Project Plan 2018 Update, April 2018 Table 48: Costs for Pilot Study to Evaluate Seagrass Planting Techniques Task Quantity Unit Cost Total Cost Design and permit 1 $50,000 $50,000 Install linear feet of breakwater 100 $550 $55,000 Deploy lantin units from uprooting due to grazing or grazing pressure and sediment Encapsulated rhizomes resist Technique 1: Jeb units 30,000 $4 $120,000 Technique 2: Peat pots 1,940 $5 $9,700 Technique 3: Safe pots 2,420 $9 $21,780 Herbivore excluders 220 $369 $81,180 Install herbivore excluders 1 $37,000 $37,000 Remove herbivore excluders 220 $44 $9,680 Maintain sites and enhance sediment month) 24 $14,080 $337,920 Monitor quarterly 8 $1,000 $8,000 Final report 1 1 $3,000 $3,000 Total N/A I N/A $733,260 Jeb unit: Approximately 3-5 Peat pot: Approximately 25 Safe pot: Approximately 25 shoots with their rhizomes in a shoots rooted in a 4 -inch pot. shoots wrapped in a 3 -inch, biodegradable pellet filled with a The relatively large pot and well- coconut coir pot. The unit growth medium, installed by rooted shoots yield protection provides protection from hand or planted mechanically. from uprooting due to grazing or grazing pressure and sediment Encapsulated rhizomes resist loss due to moving sediment. transport. uprooting. Can be produced in The units take more time to large quantities relatively grow and plant. quickly, and transported easily. Figure 23: Types of Seagrass Planting Units for Pilot Study 4.4. Respond The funding raised from the Save Our Indian River Lagoon sales tax will go towards the projects listed in the sections above that will reduce or remove pollutants and restore the lagoon. In addition, $10 million of the funding, over a period of 10 years, will go towards monitoring efforts to measure the success, nutrient removal efficiency, and cost effectiveness of projects included in this plan or in future updates of this plan. Measuring effectiveness is important for reporting progress toward total load reduction targets and for refining project designs to be more effective with each iteration. The monitoring data will be used to determine which projects are providing the most benefit in the most cost-effective manner so that the plan can be updated, as needed. The data will also be used to ensure the lagoon is responding as anticipated to the reductions made so that changes to the plan can be implemented if the lagoon is not responding as expected. Prepared by Tetra Tech, Inc. and Closewaters, LLC 2N Save Our Indian River Lagoon Project Plan 2018 Update, April 2018 4.4.1 Adaptive Management to Report, Reassess, and Respond The IRL is located along the Space Coast, which is also known as a global center for exploration, innovation, and development of cutting edge technology. With a dedicated funding source and a brilliant community dedicated to meeting the challenges of today and tomorrow, it is wise to have a process that allows this plan to be updated and revised as new opportunities and better solutions are developed. The intent of the proposed adaptive management strategy is to provide a process that not only allows but also fosters the development and implementation of better tools and techniques, and allows the tax rate to be reduced accordingly or retired ahead of schedule. Although this plan was developed with the best information available in 2016, identifying the sources of water quality pollution and pairing those problems with the most timely and cost- effective solutions is a rapidly changing field of knowledge. In order to respond to change and take advantage of future opportunities, monitoring is necessary. Even without change in the industry, monitoring will provide data to support and refine the application of existing technology. An adaptive management approach will be used to provide a mechanism to make adjustments to the plan based on new information. As projects from this plan are implemented, the actual costs and nutrient reduction benefits will be tracked and the plan will be modified, as needed, as project performance in the lagoon basin is better understood. This plan will be updated approximately annually with information from implemented projects and adjustments to the remaining projects. A volunteer committee of diversely skilled citizens will be assembled to assist the County with the annual plan updates. The Citizen Oversight Committee will consist of seven representatives and seven alternates that represent the following fields of expertise: science, technology, economics/finance, real estate, education/outreach, tourism, and lagoon advocacy. The League of Cities will nominate representatives for three fields of expertise and nominate alternates for the remaining four fields of expertise. The Brevard County Board of County Commissioners will nominate representatives for the other four fields of expertise and alternates for the remaining three fields of expertise. All Citizen Oversight Committee representatives and alternates will be appointed by the Brevard County Board of County Commissioners. Appointees will serve for a two-year term, after which time they may be considered for reappointment or replacement. The Committee's recommendations for plan updates will be presented at least annually to the Board of County Commissioners, and changes to the plan will be approved by the Board of County Commissioners. Brevard County staff will provide project monitoring reports to the Citizen Oversight Committee and will work with them to recommend adjusting the planned projects, as needed. The adaptive management process allows for alternative projects to be submitted by municipalities and other community partners to be reviewed by the Citizen Oversight Committee for inclusion in the next annual update to this plan. Projects that deliver comparable nutrient removal benefits may be approved for inclusion in the plan. If a new approved project costs more than the average cost per pound of TN for that project type listed in this plan at the time of project submittal, the requesting partner must provide the balance of the costs. The requesting partner will be allowed reasonable overhead cost to manage the project from design and permitting through construction completion. 4.4.2 Research Needs Although this project plan does not fund research, it should be recognized that many important research questions need attention. Universities, state agencies, and non-profit organizations are currently leading lagoon research efforts. This plan acknowledges the research needs identified in the FDEP BMAPs, SJRWMD 2011 Superbloom Report, and IRL National Estuary Program Prepared by Tetra Tech, Inc. and Closewaters, LLC Save Our Indian River Lagoon Project Plan 2018 Update, April 2018 (NEP) Comprehensive Conservation and Management Plan (CCMP) Update, which are summarized below. Research needs identified in the BMAPs (FDEP 2013a, FDEP 2013b, and FDEP 2013c): o Collect new bathymetry data for the IRL Basin, which would be used in the seagrass depth limit evaluations. o Continue and increase the frequency of the monitoring along the existing seagrass transects to track seagrass composition, density, and extent. o Implement phytoplankton, drift algae, and macroalgae monitoring in the basin. o Track watershed loads by monitoring inflow and outflow nutrient concentrations for each jurisdiction. o Verify the BMP effectiveness values used in the BMAPs, as needed. o Test/verify the TN, TP, and seagrass depth regression equations using the seagrass data collected since 1999. o Collect groundwater load contribution data and conduct groundwater modeling. o Implement storm event monitoring at the major outfalls. o Assess potential impacts to seagrass from sediment resuspension due to high boat traffic in parts of the lagoon. o Collect data on nutrient flux/internal recycling of legacy nutrient loads held within the IRL sediments and exchanged with the water column. Research needs identified in 2011 Superbloom Report (SJRWMD 2016b): o Garner an improved understanding of the ideal biological and physiological conditions and tolerances of picocyanobacteria (small cyanobacteria) and Pedinophyceae (green microflagellate), including their ability to use organic forms of nutrients, their ability to fix nitrogen, their nutrient uptake rates, their reproductive rates, and their defenses against grazers. o Maintain or expand water quality sampling to ensure spatiotemporal variations are captured adequately, which could include continuous monitoring of various parameters to fill gaps between monthly samples. o Develop an improved understanding of the physiological tolerances of drift algae and seagrasses, especially manmade conditions that could be mitigated to improve health or natural resilience. o Maintain or expand surveys of drift algae and seagrasses to improve the capacity to evaluate their role in nutrient cycles. o Improve the ability to model bottom-up influences from external and internal nutrient loads, including atmospheric deposition, surface water runoff, groundwater inputs, diffusive flux from muck, decomposition of drift algae, and cycling and transformation of nitrogen and phosphorus. o Enhance surveys of bacterioplankton to improve the understanding of nutrient cycling. o Improve surveys of potential zooplanktonic, infaunal, epifaunal, and fish grazers to enhance the understanding of spatiotemporal variation in top-down control of phytoplankton blooms. o Evaluate grazing pressure exerted by common species to enhance the understanding of top-down control of phytoplankton blooms. • Research needs identified in the CCMP Update (IRL NEP 2008): o Undertake further studies of septic systems in the region to quantify the impacts of septic systems on the IRL and to further quantify the extent of "problem" and "potential problem" areas. Prepared by Tetra Tech, Inc. and Closewaters, LLC Save Our Indian River Lagoon Project Plan 2018 Update, April 2018 o Continue projects related to monitoring the resources of the IRL and address gaps in data as needed. o Identify, inventory and assess finfish and shellfish habitats within the IRL and implement appropriate management and restoration strategies. o Develop a coordinated fisheries research agenda to improve the present knowledge of the fisheries in the IRL. o Support and expand research initiatives and coordinated finfish and shellfish management strategies specific to the IRL. o Support the inventory and assessment of non-native invasive fauna and flora within the IRL basin. o Implement a lagoon -wide, multi -species, multi -disciplinary approach to determine the status of emerging infectious diseases in the IRL, assess trends, and identify underlying causes. o Undertake studies of wildlife diseases occurring in the IRL region, which may be caused by human activities. o Track state, national and international actions and research concerning climate change issues that affect the IRL. o Support IRL-based research that considers and integrates global climate change issues and seeks practical scientific, technological and public policy solutions. o Undertake research to develop new and improved wetland management BMPs. o Monitor boating impacts to IRL natural resources. Where appropriate, establish resource protection zones and monitor their effectiveness. Prepared by Tetra Tech, Inc. and Closewaters, LLC Save Our Indian River Lagoon Project Plan 2018 Update, April 2018 Section 5. 2017 Plan Update Local municipalities and partners were invited to submit new projects for inclusion in the Save Our Indian River Lagoon Project Plan. The projects submitted were required to deliver comparable nutrient removal benefits at similar costs as those projects listed in the original plan for each sub -lagoon. To determine the amount of funding that a project would be eligible to receive from the Save Our Indian River Lagoon Trust Fund, the estimated TN reductions from the project were multiplied by the allowable cost/lb/yr of TN shown below in Table 49 for that project type. The costs shown in Table 49 are an average of the cost per pound of TN removed from the projects listed in the original plan. The requesting partners each submitted a "Save Our Indian River Lagoon Project Plan Project Submittal Request Form" to Brevard County for review of the proposed projects. The project forms were provided to the Citizen Oversight Committee to evaluate the potential for inclusion in the plan. The projects recommended by the Citizen Oversight Committee were presented to the Brevard County Board of County Commissioners for approval to include in this plan supplement. Table 49: Cost Share per Pound of TN Removed by Project Type for the 2017 Plan Supplement Project Type Average Cost/lb/yr of TN WWTF Upgrades for Reclaimed Water $214 Septic System Removal $852 Septic System Upgrades $802 Stormwater Projects $88 Muck Removal $408 Oyster Reef/Living Shorelines $473 5.1. New Projects in the 2017 Plan Supplement The approved projects for inclusion in the 2017 Save Our Indian River Lagoon Supplement are summarized in Table 50. This table lists the responsible entity, project description, sub -lagoon location, TN and TP reductions, and the amount of Save Our Indian River Lagoon Trust Fund funding that is being applied to each project. Of the 42 projects approved for funding, 13 were later withdrawn by the project applicants. Projects were withdrawn for a variety of reasons including adverse site conditions and insufficient matching funds. Withdrawn projects are noted with an asterisks (*) and are further discussed in Section 6.4. Funding from the Save Our Indian River Lagoon Trust Fund that were not used by the withdrawn projects are available to restore funding to the most cost-effective or shovel -ready approved projects of the same type currently in the unfunded projects list (Table 51). Prepared by Tetra Tech, Inc. and Closewaters, LLC C d E Q B co eC FL r V JV �O L- CL 3 m z O E 7 p) C� o � 0 o ca d 0 0 O LL CO Efl M Efl C O ` z z .a a) — C O ` z u to CV O o O Lo M d — N N Q' C OcmJ J m Q o z O z N C C N w ALO, ° a ` j to OO 'D a) w 'a a) 0 a`) 3 f° cm E u o o c`n0 �cD E o U)o 0LL O N 0 '� coo voi .c C o f �, L ca m CU Q L O` Y V O U j, +L co .� C a) (a N O N. D) = .O Q- N L C E L •-' N O 'D U— `� °o �� Ct C O L U D O �n C N a) o n3 @ c _� v a@�°CU �y �� E aa° m �� N O O O O C D) E: !n U,— O E a) L C Y a) O C 0-0 N U m E a) C .� N 0 7 Q C > y O O v=- O cu Co N— >, j U O Q. a) L a) L? co •� O L (o a) o)Mn L y N 'D c0 a) C C O 4) O > a) c N 0 N C C 0 C L O N a) C Q N " N C L a) 0 3 0 C 'X N c,= L 3 co L y a) ° L L p C D) a) O o D._ L-02>.. 'co > V O O a) F o c0 (6 M a) w Q a) M d N aa) u -o Q�� D)C ° 0--au)o,E coo >,orn 'Q d t U a) — C o° o E a .3 a -" cu a) C) O c Co > .— a) ' �' N >, w r 7 cts o o X co co w a) 5 c m E c>a :° c�'a 5 ate') � c 'o Y '0 ., U s 0a)a)n°3ocwwl—°L>,m �•o�cga)E 3'�LcaC°°aDOo a °' 3 o rno 3r o °c aa)) uoi °� c6 o air E o'7N o ch c CL Xw o N m ° CL � — Q"� �� N V O Q X 7 Co cn a) rein o)� Ew CL En 0)u;" m a)w ° o o CUM- cn 'tn � C O C O COY >+.0 L ,� Q N E 3 O vO. N O :. O o c 0- c o -0=r a) .- o° m° > m U� a5 crd o C a),� 0 m0 a`i � — �•H c°, 3 ats o w m� w �)Y 0 CD c� mQ) � c- 3 3 u U) c ° L ° nz ca i 3Lr U m o o. a) o io c Q— voi m `-D �� ° ° o E_ U c X o) ° a) ca m Q o ° rn a°i o cca a°�i N 0)_ w a) Q c a)c E rn�M CD E v 2 cn E U r- 1- € � aoi rn� o Qw° c aci"r zn � 0 cnF z c� ° 3 ny'> �°n'c oQ� nc'� c uoi oQmY o °.SS m nm °w W � m` cca C") - w -0 cn W am c°) 0 m .. N w Y U E CO O r Q- W O �' (0 O- N d 0 ) U >+ "DN a) 0) CU U C +� O U E CD a) z a c a) O cn o ° d .r v 3 U U) a) M O ° a a)3 m° U) a) 'ccn "M 4) m 0 �a C C CD M `- M N M It OD ' � O M O O ap N O O c0 lf) m 13 O Or 0p N � Lf) I- a0 a. = 3 O M O DD O O - 69 N (-i ( Eiq CO N 't�- M — CO) O N Ly, EA Efi Efl 69 6q 64 69 64 C O L d 0 m Q Z Q Z Q Z Q Z O O N O v C,.) �t O N d— C O L w. Z m 0 M (0 — Oco 1� N M r, O 'It M M M r r N ";T d N a) C O a_ c c c c c c c m @ m m m m m m m L J C c c c c m c m c m c m C m C m c m 0 O O O a) m m m m m m m Z U U U U a) cn E c O a) a) a) a) a� m -o >, N m E 'O N 0 E� a) 0 O C m co m C` m m m m @ E w 7 0 a� L fn c)a) o L fn rn� o p) J •O o m m C O c O C o c O C O m 3w @ m u a�'im 0 U Na) O O C O a) N a) a) a) �momE fl cn 3 U) X a) c0 x N O •0 w c c c c c p 0 a= N o O a �.c Oa ° C•� o) rn m 3-0 L CD oc�°, °��°, c c c c c mos ' 0. � 3 Y ?� Y E a)0 aa)x J p, O a) N N N N N t m L U) 3 0 'i 0 N L 0 o f u (6 " p 0 (0 —O "" S m ., —_ « ._- a) 3 C m O U) O cn O 0 O O O N 0 _a) a L E O C m C U N O Y C O 0 O' -- Y� �- E c �p O C m .L. () x a) x a) x a) x a) x m O N 0 m a) L C as U) E 0)'w-�. E N o)'c m Cm_ O a) O O O O O 3 N m o d c 0"r-a�c°)im�a)`�3c�� EO � ami ' io cwac�a L _N �@° �cUo 0 w'X N 'X O= a) - :o ?c 0 " E N b L aL) aa)) 0) aL) 0) s a) ti _ 0a)m- � Ln N� -C in o w" C N s 3 aa)) 0) aa)) 0) aa)) 0) ac) O ac) 0) UU0a) a) C Q C N M w O C m w ._ O C a) Co m 4) _0 Cco O L N O f0 O C + C" L C E 0 a) L C a) .. E 0 2 0 m-0 C O 0 7 v j O y C O c w 4L_- 4L'- AL'-. � O 7 C ''�= O E c Z m Co O) x0 O> C 0 a)C 0 0>0 a)= CL c N " 2� a) N a) a) a) N O L a) OO L w () L d0 O 0) O a) L m 0 L m 0 L m 0 L m (6 L a) m ui L L L O Q 0 y -C Y'3 O c.'L_''3 a) C a) X �' d00 0.00 dx0 d00 d00 a)a) a) >,EO M,t0!)w U C m N.0 C m a)m� UQw W ������ Z)O Z)-0a_H 0 3'a o d a) E (D E c a) N r a) C :3 c : 07 C E O C :. O — c - a) a) O d U a) Q— m a) d— a) d— a) a.— a) a.— a) d— () d— O C v0 LU +6 m D❑ m U �U m m N m m U NU m m a) m m NU m m �U m m O U a) O m w 0 O L > Y •- > O m v- > 0 m •- > 0 m v- > 0 m > 0 m > 0 m .- > 0 m 4-- O -0L >, >, m L >, c >, c >,c >, c >,c >, c >, c >, U) U U ma. UUUUUUUUUUUUUU U Z J m m m O m m ~ 3:.o a) a- a) m a) mCD N O U) .O y cn �O Cl) p N ro m a_ U `m Q! C (n y0- O m— a) N m m (n O m d U U— a) 0) > m e O O a) 3> c C O p) L C 0) Q m O 0 2 m E# X —, C x c a) a) 0) x w C x 7 x �w =U O a -U O JD O 0 m U 0 0 2m0m 0 0 w m m<mUm C O 0 0 L m Um c CN qt 04 In 000 cC 'G Q 3 CN M N i d• Lci O � LL 69 Efl — E9 N Efl C O L d v m ch Do rn Q z � v d c 0 L z 0 3 N 00 q;r00 O O d — M r CO 0 0 J cu c0 J ED t0 c0 C C L 3 C N c6 m c0 m z N U a) V! V L (0 c O L to N ~ Y Co cn Ow dO U te a) a)a) � QO ON L_rZ L00 cn O (D 0)C 0 0 a) 3 O a) f— YO O m= U C -a n N a) Y C N +� `~ u7 L 03 L a) O C 0- a)cn w-0m0ac)a)a)�.0 M cLOcuc�aonT \N CU Y C U+'CD �L 00—) Co OY a) cB 0)0-0 0 CCU Ucom Co (D 0 a) 0 O is N i cn E 0 p» C - r CL CO �n M tet' a) Q' E t O 0 CO -O .O O CO = Q1 0 N N N -O N E j ca c w- w C _ C O N L j C 0 0 U C a) v0i -0 ° �w W � o c 0 o 0 y 7 � n � 0 0�0 a) � � 5.o E 0@- to O n — y O U y w U L U D co y N t U C= ` C. O 0 N U O O O fn d 3 a) c0 w _ U O -a 0 3 CO a) C T p -C O co N 0 w O L C C 0 w E- a) 3 co E �W U a)� 0 co ai�0. �o� 0 E E C a viZ c W ami ��0+>,o c a) cn �o D�,— o0- 0�-C c� a)��� 0 0 O L � o — — X U F+ c0 Q. a) C ECU U O a) O m O r 0 w cO 3 t; Y L w o o 3 E a) 0 0 E� CL 0-0 m 0 O a) E a) i y C 3-0 CO OY U a) a'SQ r- 0. o� .0 a) N �) S 0 cu co 0 w 0— L 0 0� o U) :_. = N' N Y w C Y fn a) M 7 -0 'O a) N nEin�a)>°'�c60a°ia`ai�� C O N c6 j, a) c6 O N O` 4t-_ r N a)' E 0 w N L 3 m io c� o c —_ >, !E 0: L Ea)3�a) a2)CLCD a) E o L :? fn 0 'o a) 'o a 000Es o 0 U U w a 3 U 3 0 ca CO I— ns 7 U .� �' t a) O T O L L L 00 w N Y Q Cl U) to 0-- d— /ay) Bcd 0 %� m C T j a) > C r E co ca a) 0 cn O LU m d a m C) 'o Y H U) 7 L d o 0 0 -0 ca N o T T r= as L T U U2 m U L a) v0) Y 0 E L o z d m .., o in a .0 @ Co w O C Y CU y w C (n O L IL oaa) 'o m o —) D @ m a) C� 0 o in a) � S cfl LO rn 00 Na0 O N (O 00 m V 000 N It t- �LO < L d CO0 00 O N (O Cl) O �- (f) rl- 00 00 r M N LL di FA Efl Efl (fl C O ` w d V ) L — Q Q 00 M L N N 'a' C700 Z Z d Q' C O ` +: 1 00 (o(o M O (O In 0)(0 ti (.0 O N a0 O N C O J J J J J J -1 m J L L L C L L L m ' 0 Z 0 0 Z 0 Z 0 0 Z 0 0 Z 0 o Z c a) C� U N a) 3p(0 cvo += O .. C N m E O O _° N X CA _ J N O C rn w aa)) Q c m w a w r= C C C L m ca c cn .0 c° "D = Q 0 C C Na J p C O O -C C -c C E J N N m L .►+ C c 7- C (nn N a) N C O C— >' C O c O b C C m C O c� m C C C w, r U O> i L •C C Q- T •- (0 >p N a co .m C D C -O c C a) C 'D p w L a) m C Cm C M 'N O C c>0 E C Cao m E 0D ." L. "O N a N C `@ Qc U) E 0 m .X (0 c6 Q Q c C E e a) C E y N ° O c o o-0 M --C a") —:3 c w o C;) ID ° m � o (D o OCU ° a)- �U X m o� o a c.j a) o— C O L (n Q .-. ?� " °'�� c.cw O :2 e E N c o o C o ° E Y 3 U C +' ' C °)'> 3� QC ` _ ao �. Ltcn c C .0 "6 O ° a).0 O c.J O N Q Q c'D � N C C N C p— N rn" o m L C C 0 O, cp C a) C N U) E co E C a`, C J C C C W 'D > CO C m a) m o Q c`0 C- Q1 _j c j N 'D C F- O C y UO Z .0 a) .3 O C° O.5 •C C Q Q C -p >i C - "O >i a) C "C" C .@ •E U C �. D) vi C i c N L c0 L w -C. O w 0 cn +c U •(c-) `O ..C.. w 7 w w C 00 E E E L O m N C cn L -0 m v- L> O n. - X D) a) p O M C O 'D C m° Y C` cr,O 3 C (; O o C —Cl) O U cn a) N :�, to U O` x m L p m o m m "' >i E C D NV C O _C N S o C mL m° D. O _m C O o) of D) (�0 N L N C >, a)O L- U c C C 5 w 3" c 3 V -p o i a) O L- C U i=•� � N' C U c� w m3— L _ to ui y 9_ m E - C cm Loa )Eca)• 'c�o- cines N �- c'X C x C inc3o�<n�U33�_C�•c >,c�CC—mm m C U C o ° N° +_ — L X C U) U ,C X— Q m �> U C o 'o C o -o -D O C° �... V 0 E � C" - 6-5 o) E c 3 LCL w C- p a) a) •-' 0 CU m:_ C" C E cu 'C C` L p L O j) cu 'co .0 C C O •X n mU �- OL a) p <0 O rn•> m> Q w O O L N C J "r C C 'L' cn 0 L O (6 cu 0 m C a) C Y a) V L i a C E m cl F- rnE� °�_ 3F-ocnnCL ��w Ow m Qf.nF-in m -0w �UF- L X E Lm. Q) °) a) a) >, >, >, >, m cTa C Y c c c O c O m E m E O C j �- j +•- O U O U U U c CL W F- F- p D -o -0 d C O O cu > m > m > m > O O U CU m m m m U U C C .t5 0 -00 Er - ` O E in c m N p N m m Z m cn o X d of C m L 3 Qo c c }O cU ° C cm C m -p c C 0 N C C m C E C '� U C C U 0 m o m p# O Q L a E O E —.. ° w :� = �.= w C N m= ° +' ° o m c �.. ° m CL m mm c= O o cLL CU•a �; o (n F-- JF- Ya- O O0 O(L -i Zd' > cC O O r- V co M I- N -M M �O Ci m m FL- a0 tp M I- NN � to O M 06 O U O � � MMMM � m 61:� `- ffl 6s EA 64 C O ` :.> 3 y N r m LO r M CIJCY) N O) rl- N to CD fl - .a N d - C Z w F- N to I- I� N r M O N N m h O r O N co M .m d Cl) co N C O m m m m @ co b m c m c m c m c r r @ cu m ' aa) m m m m o r- 0 0 amici Kaci amici v- o N U U Z Z Z U U U Z 0 O) = G C C Mn .- (6 m cu U N c C) cn — £ L m E ami E ami E O C7 3 cu co mEa) o3o O O O «s Q Q a o 0 'D CD O U O m C 'c •D •D -c m m m c m c o) C m c � C L cm 0 m.0 y a) CD C E C (� (� (� _a m O C a) .�.., a) mCL) C y L >i X a) X a) X a) X a)x y a) 7 C X O N cyp H x D +`� E 7 d a O O m m m m y L N C_O NOO p E ++ mN m E C a) a) w CO mL co CCCNL O U 'D XC 7 N NOOV U m L '3 '3 '3 N oo ' , cpcEcuyin a— M a m EYEc c c ® ® ® ® m co D p�no a a) m U) ' �co_m-�E a) " c— a) E m E 0) a) co o :_ o a -6 •n •n mm y �' y m m o O O O a) c d O °c) m L > 0 a) C �" Vim) u>i u>i E C C -D "D •D 'D 1 p d O_ C :� .� O .� E +' m L" O •N a0 c 7 U a) N N a) m m m m m 7 a) NacicL X N 03 3 3 L c -D -D -D -D E NX a) cu y a) E a) ao a ` a) — y y cn m N N O O O O �- O 0— —_ to " c 'o mom, a) —_ y 3 w >,.0 Nf .- O .- O O •- O m m m Co Coai mai - m 3` C N C w 3 CD y L I- C c c c � O w O ��4--.mow O C O C 0 3 w 0 3 C> °a' °)� c �om�F-oo 0 0 ococ c CC COCycw EE oa) a) �)� a) a) E a) ai E O 5 �� o o _o c o c o c o c m m mm> > E 3 x m� Co 2 2 2 2 E m m_p_m p m_p m.o a) a U c `O •`. OL a N a J= a U `O C U" 2 Q m 2 y y i O a3 y i :� y i y :? m o _m m in tp c in :� tp C in «� m c ) c6 C v +D �' L c H (n -0 i4 m•D in 3 Uw O 0c� O- 0 O U� C C c C C c N O > m m a) ci a) a) i () a) m >+ y m E mO E a) () a) O O O O O O j cam, oc m m a—a—a—a—o mmmmmmmmm � .2 � 2 � :2 a) �2 m O Nw o_ o.. U U�U �U (D 2 2 2 a ,- O .- O > O m w >w 0 cp >� O cp >w 0 tp O O O O O O cu D: >+ C w C >, > U U m UUUUUUUUU ._m._.m.=m.. .. U .r U .. U .. U U ` m y a) y x 0 >, D c a) > _ m E E m a) a_ o m m ID m e m m '2 O m a) > O Z z Y C cn D N m Co a) > a) m > N ;_ m om +) E m V i d c O > 7 > O Y a) m a o O a) Q_ O m= Q 0 x a) a) A E c �� -m" w o a)a) m x oa o ao o EF 0 e U =U- f u�M<ZOOw)wOZ a ca a _ CC) Cl / a C) \ / to .ik k k N o iL—� § o co L ' - - 69- % c / :kk t C go d 2 . C\i � .2 .\ �C.\ k 9 k k CNk a I / c j / 2 c ' . 3 c I k c /0) 0, :\\ /f \ 0\ kE § 2 /% 7%& 5 / § icn & / k 04 f\ \�\ 3 )4) V; V; 0 (D o \Jf2/\ k $ b � Rcnc>0 /�f/-3: Ch7 REc _\CU_>,% ƒ Eto§I% 7 0 �E t / C)-- Co:0m° x 2 e�=ma2 c c2\6 co . I c £ £ _ R R E ocu c > § k m \ . $ E \ \ \ m a 2 v \ f F a)\ / 2 $ o c: 10 22 >� f(7 oO �6 /$2 a ca a _ CC) Cl / a Save Our Indian River Lagoon Project Plan 2018 Update, April 2018 5.2. Unfunded Projects in the 2017 Plan Supplement In order to include the new projects approved as part of the 2017 Supplement, the funding had to be shifted from the least cost-effective or shovel -ready projects of the same or similar type that were listed in the original plan. This balance is shown in Figure 24. The projects listed in Table 51 were unfunded in the 2017 annual update process. However, if additional funding is obtained from other sources, such as grants or legislative appropriations, these projects could be added back to the plan tables through a streamlined approval process. Since these projects were previously approved for inclusion in the Save Our Indian River Lagoon Project Plan, if additional funds become available during the fiscal year, individual projects in Table 3 could be funded with Trust Fund dollars, if their reinsertion is recommended by the Citizen Oversight Committee and if a budget change request for such projects is approved by the Board of County Commissioners. This accelerated process would not need to wait for the next annual plan update. Reinsertion of these projects into the funded Save Our Indian River Lagoon Project Plan would be reflected retroactively in the next annual update to the plan. Table 51: Summary of Unfunded Projects from the 2017 Save Our Indian River Lagoon Project Plan Supplement Sub -lagoon Project Name Cost TN Reductions (lbs/r TP Reductions (lbs/yr) North IRL Sykes Creek C septic sstem removal $1,700,000 1,426 N/A Central IRL 112 septic sstem upgrades $1,792,000 2,233 N/A Banana River Lagoon Stormwater project in Basin 754 $100,000 734 95 Banana River Lagoon Stormwater project in Basin 602 $100,000 1,068 109 North IRL Stormwater project in Basin 1434 $125,000.00 932 112 North IRL Stormwater project in Basin 1151 $125,000.00 1,057 141 North IRL Stormwater project in Basin 1078 $125,000.00 1,250 187 North IRL Stormwater project in Basin 1399 $125,000.00 1,570 256 North IRL Stormwater project in Basin 1301 $125,000.00 1,025 154 North IRL Stormwater project in Basin 1368 $125,000.00 1,311 200 North IRL Stormwater pro'ect in Basin 408 $125,000.00 1,179 170 North IRL Stormwater project in Basin 338 $125,000.00 1,902 188 North IRL Stormwater project in Basin 1367 $100,000.00 1,042 146 North IRL Stormwater project in Basin 1384 $100,000.00 923 142 North IRL Stormwater project in Basin 1318 $100,000.00 1,124 148 North IRL Stormwater project in Basin 155 $100,000.00 1,149 122 North IRL Stormwater project in Basin 289 $100,000.00 1,112 223 North IRL Stormwater project in Basin 193 $100,000.00 1,316 198 North IRL Stormwater project in Basin 1441 $100,000.00 1,034 149 North IRL Stormwater project in Basin 660 $100,000.00 844 212 North IRL Stormwater project in Basin 952 $100,000.00 1,251 212 Banana River Lagoon 29% Sykes Creek dredging $7,000,000 12,536 1,112 Banana River Lagoon 38% Cape Canaveral Area dredging $10,000,000 33,051 5,026 North IRL 29% Grand Canal dredging $7,000,000 11,356 1,000 North IRL 38% Eau Gallie dredging $10,000,000 33,512 5,023 Total I Total $39, 592, 000 1 115,9371 15.325 Prepared by Tetra Tech, Inc. and Closewaters, LLC 308 , A6 of Save Our Indian River Lagoon Project Plan 2018 Update, April 2018 Section 6. 2018 Plan Update For the 2018 Plan Update, local municipalities and partners were once again invited to submit new projects for inclusion in the Save Our Indian River Lagoon Project Plan. The projects submitted were required to deliver comparable nutrient removal benefits at similar costs as those projects listed in the original plan for each sub -lagoon. To determine the amount of funding that a project would be eligible to receive from the Save Our Indian River Lagoon Trust Fund, the estimated TN reductions from the project were multiplied by the allowable cost/lb/yr of TN shown below in Table 52 for that project type. The costs shown in Table 52 are an average of the cost per pound of TN removed from the projects listed in the SOIRLPP, as amended. Based on a recommendation from the Citizen Oversight Committee, instead of having one allowable cost/lb/yr of TN for stormwater projects, as was the case for the 2017 Plan Supplement, there are now three allowable costs based on the project location. Separate allowable costs are now provided for septic system removal by sewer extension (expanding the sanitary sewer collection system to connect septic systems) and by sewer connection (connecting septic systems to existing sanitary sewer collection system infrastructure). Cost -share for a new project, muck interstitial water treatment, was also added. In addition, based on new information about the reductions associated with oyster reefs versus vegetative living shoreline, separate allowable costs are included for each of these types of living shorelines. The requesting partners each submitted a "Save Our Indian River Lagoon Project Plan Project Submittal Request Form" to Brevard County for review of the proposed projects. The project forms were provided to the Citizen Oversight Committee to evaluate the potential for inclusion in the plan. The projects recommended by the Citizen Oversight Committee were presented to the Brevard County Board of County Commissioners for approval to include in this plan update. Table 52: Cost Share per Pound of TN Removed by Project Type for the 2018 Plan Update Project Type Average Cost/lb/yr of TN WWTF Upgrades for Reclaimed Water $231 Septic System Removal by Sewer Extension $872 Septic System Removal by Sewer Connection $443 Septic System Upgrades $802 Stormwater Projects - Mainland $88 Merritt Island $89 Barrier Island $99 Muck Removal $403 Treatment of Muck Interstitial Water $175 Oyster Reef $392 Vegetative Living Shorelines $180 6.1. Additional Project Benefits Although the eligible Save Our Indian River Lagoon Trust Fund contribution to new projects is determined based on the amount of TN removed, the benefits of implementing these projects include reductions in other pollutant sources, as well. These projects will reduce a multitude of different contaminates to meet water quality targets and improve the health, productivity, aesthetic Prepared by Tetra Tech, Inc. and Closewaters, LLC Save Our Indian River Lagoon Project Plan 2018 Update, April 2018 appeal, and economic value of the lagoon. These additional benefits vary according to project design and site-specific conditions but often include significant reduction of pathogenic bacteria, viruses, human and animal wastes, chemicals, metals, plastics, and sediments (see Table 53). Table 53: Pollutants Removed by Different Project Types Stormwater Septic System Removal Septic System, Upgrade Muck Removal Nitrogen Nitrogen Nitrogen Nitrogen Phosphorus Phosphorus Phosphorus Phosphorus Sediments E. coli E. coli Clay sediments Escherichia coli (E. coli) Viruses Viruses Hydrogen sulfide Viruses Fecal coliform Fecal coliform BOD Fecal coliform Pharmaceuticals BOD Pesticides Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD) Metals Oil Litter This Save Our Indian River Lagoon Project Plan is an adaptable document informed by science and under supervision of the community. As monitoring updates our understanding of IRL pollutants, the plan projects will target funds to the most successful and cost-effective projects. 6.2. Project Funding 6.2.1 Revenue Projection Update The County calculated a new estimate for Save Our Indian River Lagoon Sales Tax revenues based on the median of collections in the first 12 months of the sales tax with the current consumer price index for inflation of 2.13% compounded over the life of the tax. The new estimate for the period of 2017 through 2026 is $486,392,368.53, or on average $48.6 million per year. This current estimate is $14.6 million per year more than the $34 million per year estimate in the original Save Our Indian River Lagoon Plan, which was based on 2016 dollars. This new estimate allows for the implementation of additional projects each year. 6.2.2 Contingency Fund Reserve A Contingency Fund Reserve will be included with the development and adoption of the County's budget each fiscal year, and will amount to 5% of the total Trust Fund dollars that are budgeted for all approved projects scheduled to occur or move ahead in that fiscal year. This includes projects in the Save Our Indian River Lagoon Project Plan, including additions captured in annual updates or Plan Supplements. The purpose of the reserve is to fund emergency response to harmful algal blooms and major fish kills or to cover reasonable funding shortfalls that may occur during project implementation and would delay implementation or completion of that project unless a ready source of funds is on hand. If the cost increase for an individual project is less than 10% of the estimated cost or eligible amount of Trust Fund cost -share stated in the Save Our Indian River Lagoon Project .Plan or update, then additional funding from the contingency reserve may be allocated to the project, as needed, in accordance with Brevard County policies and administrative orders. For projects that are contracted with municipalities or other partners and encounter cost overruns, the cost -share agreement may be increased up to 10% over the eligible cost -share amount stated in Attachment E of the cost -share contract. This amendment will be executed by the Chairman of the County Commission and the appropriate municipal representative or authorized agent of a partnering organization. Prepared by Tetra Tech, Inc. and Closewaters, LLC Save Our Indian River Lagoon Project Plan 2018 Update, April 2018 For project cost increases that are more than 10% above the estimated cost or eligible amount of Trust Fund cost -share stated in the Save Our Indian River Lagoon Project Plan or update, County staff will evaluate the project circumstances and present findings and a recommendation to the Citizen Oversight Committee. The Committee will make a recommendation to the County Manager or County Commission (based on respective signature authority adopted in County contracting policy) on whether the project should proceed. 6.3. New Projects in the 2018 Plan Update The approved projects for inclusion in the 2018 Plan Update are summarized in Table 54. This table lists the responsible entity, project description, sub -lagoon location, TN and TP reductions, and the amount of Save Our Indian River Lagoon Trust Fund funding that is being applied to each project. Once the 2018 Plan Update is approved by the County Commission, the projects are part of the Save Our Indian River Lagoon Project Plan, and are reflected in the updated plan tables shown in Section 7. New project types added as part of this 2018 Update include: • Expanded public education and outreach to address grass clippings, excess irrigation, stormwater pond maintenance, and septic system maintenance. • Sewer laterals rehabilitation. • Treatment of muck interstitial water. • Refinement of benefits for oyster reefs versus vegetated living shorelines. Prepared by Tetra Tech, Inc. and Closewaters, LLC 3N 0) CD C) I- M LO c O N m a O CD CO M 0) cd C � N Q, Q1 CSO 6 00 1 N fA di C O ca (O z z z ca ch C F- u O U) N 0 M a1 o N Cco l) C O I J J c m J Q L Q c N aa) z z U) U U m m E L ) E t 4? m s C o f '; 0 m>1 O O U W N U N W m m „_ �1 O c >, > T m 0 3 N a) Q. d Q. C C1 O CT'p1 a1 N m 3 d C N O N L j t m O c d c a m� o O L t 3> N m o o 3 C: 3 m L E� m E� �� voi M c a) m m> E c c— m m o c N m m m m.a 'O w U N �' C c `v >• CD J OL d C N - O c N_ N— 3= N m m @ Q LO C a1 COL L c 'D m Q. _ > N '� c �? ° x m .c m E m R c m E m a1 a1 m m- c rn m m y .E o Z p p1m Q o aCo U m .O c N c N E c w E Co - �' c' -t m =__ m C o > m> p m 3 c z` v 41 LO N N :O to O m U m U a) F- m e 'O rn N d N f6 m j C E v1 a L > c a1 a1 p C 0'a m 7 y C C N a) O Q. d m m O y O_ a1 CO O M O p c p N -C ca ca a1 OL ?� N C 0 p V —O p V .- d p1 c 'm0 w ° rn m 6 •-pp E p O j N CL c 0- N �c'0 0 c'D a1 m m -C C •O a1 .4 c 'D o 0 O c u1 : Y a) a) U -O � m m o•y a) 3 o> E. m O1m w C O N 6 O N Q' O - > rn c n T ti1._ C:7 5 p vl C d m J 7-0 C c`_ y 'c c U (% C V m O O U O O U U E _ C O N m co O N« umi m> m E C 7 C 7 O O p C p C 2 C�La c 0 U N c N ZO N C~ N o C 3 U c 3 0 � w C c a) ` r 3 v a1 C m Q. t5 .23 3 3r Q a1"c am e m p rn� c O m N U) C C m 3 a) m N a) °� m 3 a1 3 E m LM m E E m 3 2-> N O C d 0 ° c CO C O c C O c N ° w •m y 0 8 >, .-UO OL ami 0 t amt >, (n aaj m C U a) — L m L m U O C N N in 1? Q. > .6 E N O w L w c W c ` a) c a) C � a1 m m c � :3 .0 : . c m 0 N p U c 0 2 3:E � � � U QO m O O p O O m O Ix N w N 2:1 w m in U a1 U C aO Cj C d O O •V •m L_ m � 0 R Nm fn n a1 U n c a) .0 C �_ m Um T z �0 �1> U) oY V Q c E c a) O .>> O j> d .O 0 m m 2 E Z°U w 6U a) c c a) O ;? m m E �m 'a fn c> C a) :O N Q U J U m I OL m N aa)i >, N N N N E a) X W 7 U` z T� fn > O tn N fnw O cnU C O R4) �' N N N N (L C C M M N LO Cn M 0) 000 �• _m a d Oo N CD N ? 00 M Mp 0) 00 Cfl U. 69 6 9 0j N E9 CA Cfl In 69 _ . 69 c O ` 0. Cl) N °) (D °�° � N � c O M_ Z j N ~ N � M M co � 0) 00 N 0) N M N N V' C 0 m m J - J c6 m m O) m c m c m @ L c m c m c m J m6c c m c m a) . c m ° 0 c m m c m m c m m m E o E IL- m a > i5 C c m £ a f6 ° cn @ 0 o o)c N a) m ° CO c m m� �� 3 3v 0 .a c N� O o' EC (D� n. N T j) L o ca° Q) O cc L O o W ° a) a> m 0 E C U C cu C ° ` p 3 L 0 LO 0 O .O o t cam- 0 0 Mc°v)}0)C'�a)m a 06 O� rn U C m C C-6 O vm L ) U C O..D 3L� 3m>Ec a) N v°aM(n3 mpo- O ami om 'C a U o d> Umi a) m a U a) ' m a) a) L �� °� m >+ � f6 C N m C m 0 U m � L c a) � Y m 3' a m U o T O a fin.°ma)°LCYa>E�pom O c° U a) cc �Ua Cl) J O 0 m w CT CA m a) a) c0 C m L N •- 3 C m° m 3 x E�°�7 a) O c 30 x h rnUa0ma)EM - >CD rn m E N Q. L E m.0 U C'7 � > - 0) �Z p ca)O�naa aE�a)OLEa)- N -0 pw Cd) CU > cO N C m cu m'O N m ` amm'cncp0 p U C�3 H E E N a) a� C m? O)� �- am w� m ��- a)C m ° m �a 0 c Ua U O 0. N O -0 0� y a N m °.0 0 0 3 M a N Y 7 .O p -0' C C U cu FL- m N 0 E U > .- m 0" m 0 cn -� p m ? O CU C)ca-C E o+ 0 O 3 j 3 a o L a) N �` a)- N — 0 a p)m a)a O O 30 a)� m >J �a� m U m m- mw m d p)'• 6 a) 3 2) 0 > C a'EO 0Ea N= C° a) M 7 O" L (n E OL f>/�) _� cn c` c c C� �'za�r a) m o o m iia m o- c0i m m= v 3 oa ac) c o cn a) > `)-C a) a) > m E c -Z C o ca aa))�� U - 0 5 3 m CL'> E p aa) c m 3 C-0- m O. O> 30 L] U y U` c m m° f`6 a) ao N o O r m 0 a) a m w 3�N E N _ Q o° ``� « cn U O C a a c p c C> 0 � m 0 c c a) air 3a c a o 3 9 a) C a�0i m o �� 3 0 m a� c ma, cYi � � E °o > m o> m c m a) m >.o -Q•� Ana oa CD a) o C E a) rn� ° ch E rn>m E E a) ?>.O a, 0 °' c a) 0 °' o m c m ma EL a)U v n m c pY C Co �' 00 - f0 0) o a O j,.0 o N a) T j O h y m N m m Q 0 to to a) U 0 a) U U X> d p r `O 0) cnocerindinrnaa>n�E)n0z �H3m off: v c D U m�mE.6-� r w. L0 U 0 0 a) V L U L U W a) m C > > to C (D a) a) m = 7 C) m m • m 0 C cc 0 L 20 C L m O m O c 0 p U c� U U C O o 0 0 m0 0 0 m C > > '� m o c x d E c L m U O U a) U m Z en OUen U m o Q •� m �m �m U J E @n m a) L L m L L U a L a d D 3N x p �m FL dN Ua) cr C m cm a) �C°) m ' > CL a)c w 3 _ O a m. n o O to L) mmC7 UIi OL Q 0 Uo 0 c M m m _ d a. >- cm 'o `n r - _ o p Q U') opo C) o 0 co d o o 00 0) L Z co o Li V 04 � c o ` IL 0 ~ M m r- aor o N co d - C O ` r- tb 2 U I.-3 to Lo N Nr coQ Z rn o (O v N d N N C p m C C C C C J @ C @ C _� C @ C y @ C @ C @ C m m U U m m m •� L@ Y C @ O a) =_ �" N C L top '� L L �L-• ca C L C Y N U C U) 7 E m in to Y ° >, C 3 N N 'U L >� _ O L a) N� Co L ° N 'O a) '- L cc Y to L m C C L •- c O@ a) a) U-0 L O -2 @ 0 V 0 0 d-0 m v' L p c cn a) E v m`" m o a�Co m CI@ E v cvNi ° a� a�� m@ a) O •p .` N c� n~ m C 8L0 L L)) 0 �� ` U) 'pp U 7 J U p_ U 7 L~ L +- O >i C@ L a) U@ a) H a tp `O j _L a O p!= U I CU a > U @ N .L.. a) a) 3 N @p to L y0 C Q tin L 3@ •C a) a) C Nin p +� U @ N C C to Q' U@ N to @ N @ p C to a) E O a'r C C° U 0 .N a) w to @ CU 0-0 O .a w C C O @ N y @ @ 'o L L in @ O to 0) (1) U ° to E N Y C @ @ L c c N ` ° y m @@ 'O a) @ C N Y @ a) C N w @ a) a E —00 @ a to ._ O O p !- � m >. a) p a E M O 3 :p C L M a c @Hm E @ �' 3 "6 0 U E@ w 'O 3 w w Up o m ° @� �'3 L p w a L N tn-0 c rn C a) a@ N E ao co @ 30 U U E 7 C@ E w O) @ to J@ �. N N@ a) L C O a) o T p N O) @ • a) C O ._ w -p @• @ C > >. - Y c p O. •C y y N O Y y_ U@ °� c m ` O) > > U p @ O E O C (a fl•a@i .0 r C J p- ,� to o ° a a� > o @ a) wU E o -'O °� °@ m m aa) o1) W cn r y D w> oL� O 0) i a� E@ o@ to N cn o pL� r EL°5(L) — w'- EV Qo��co�a")a)�•��E°�-�oc)��'3 �0��ma�° E ° (a@ a°i cL o_° o ?' >, •in 0 .U.. to U �n C V Co0 .U-. 3 C tco c Un C v C U oN w a 0) � upi 3 >' C 'p C V `° : 3 C ° o >,C a) E >' m� m� (L) O L) L) Er E ° `o @ 2 a) �- 7@ L� L o p'X oo (1) u N chi a) aa)i, c°) @ 2 o@ U L to ` m O C -Fa>@` U C _@ r N c C 15 m @ C U @ O C '� N` L p@~ t a) 0- o rL-. E` rn ~ L m a) U L p@ Q1 L C N J 4) @ O) to L O) a) to @2 'p L a @ L O O0) 0` C @ N 7 _N @ 2 • 'p L -@p U iC > N 2 O U 2 a) @@ di O t N p p p °@ 2 m t 0 Q) in N O 0 N U a) @@@ 00,0 d (n 'D L@ L O@ L rn w to U W --w 7 a) H m N U L tl � y f- U :? 7 '- OO M C a, _a: c o c 'o rn C v c p C U U N N N O H - °° - O U '0 'O "O > '2 -2 > 0 cr.Um N ` N > a) > a) > a) a) N Um m m m m m c @ wto a) CD ar c c @ @ c - a T a) N > c > p U '� U >U > U .r U •C) 'O Y :_. @ .- cUp _ c to a) O a) O@ a) U O J N N` 0 ' 0 ►. E m Q. 7 _a) C m a) C 3 a) U a. C C N a) L to (/� N L (n a) a) C d U U@ U Y 1 m N c c o c 2 2m 2 m �H �HU W J �J m(n C � @ @ a} a) C C C) O o C) 0) sca C I d o (D Cl) v Cl)03, Lri CD O Li 6q to c o r_ CL U) N Cl) N lb 04 0*)3 (D Cl) c O a. u 7 y (DD (Dr - O Or r- N M U') co O c O c J c c J c J c m ) c m m c m m c m m c 3 m c M.2 m c m Mw is MD m a) '0 0 c c m '0.0) m m� m� mo __ c 3 __ m o1_v -) - 0) v, � o m E n- - - , rn- 0)-- o m -,q mn ¢ m rn4-3 vp 0 o m �::T-- L O -c 3(Li•prm ~ N a) N 3 _ O�p._U)--MU3i m �' U a) :) 3 N y a) 0-0---o o c= fa t O d 3 v �«.. c Y a) 1- O U) a) L U) N �' N OTO m C 'O 0 L 0 c p (6 C O L6 p 0 m 'D C U) c O OO C. a) ~ m Z Z O m 0 N N` "O ()C 0,-- U c O .- m -0 N L E U) c O j 0 m 0 O y N L c U N w C w- - 7 C 0 0` c 0 U mo 2p m O a) C O .0. o - LO ' -0 LO E> �n O c p to O m2 !n m C-'0 E m L m m O C U c E a) p -Op C O y m fn U m O 0 T +L D C ca 0 D ca C 0 0 C CU pT O m CD 0 Z 'OO E c M C 0 0 0 O S E 0 o_6 '0 - N V U) (gyp a) a) v) �'' "0 c� UI Y C fn C N O m m a) •mac Q'c) U > m m � o.E m E W -- 0 m m m U0 0 OL a)a)Qaa)) a)3: --Ca coram 0 m '0- c3 0 u O L to rn. m E L O rn. m L .F I-- _0 'j U) c n� p 0 L f0 O� m m y mL aE m O 3 DoT °) m� c a) -- 0 a) 'D c% 0 E c m a) c o)o °) 3� E Q) a) 3� E rntf o °Z CL U) mZ 0_ 0)� c o m a=w y� U) a) - �_U) m cn c'= c a)� (D C U m-0 CD a v-vv='a= cv > (n a) 0�'3 > �r m — c m.m 3 o av a) -a- A aH ion o a) r-L ss d) om O a) m Q O a) .- Yy c > D C m- a) O E C C C c m 0= o 0 m a) cn-0 O a) U m C 0 a) m 1- 3 m m L L m L L y O cin 0 .L-. CO a) C. -OO m o c m m m F- N m a) .L..• w N a) U) T C•3 O >'C.-� C C.0. C N in QU) 0 d 0 u) 0) U) O C V C14 a m N O m p a) m o v, 0) C« a) O m o 0) c O o O (Dom a) o o C M (O U 0 w �[ a) C) -V C. (D cp c M m m a m C m p' O 3 0 `o m O ..L.• M E-0 O m m C :�'a Lo rn N— a) a 0 7- 'm a) m y c°_m CF) Com p m a). �c -1c* o 0 a) o m aNi 0 c 3 m cn c O o a) 0 U) m Lcn° 3@ o i m (Dm' c)�— �m d000mminrncm�a)(7m U) -0 U 2 ova 0 a) `=-0 o ow 3���W N - c N a) a) N > m m _> m 0 0 O m m a) 0 d U) N O N y (n m p Q. N L m a 3cd3cUa�'aC_Ca)EUE-2 m m O m 'O o L p.Ln20u m O U) :3 C O o 1-U inC..camo w L L O lL a) 0 a) a) a) 2 m m m 0 m a) o N c O N y C C C C o o (>0 (>V (6 p L6 p w ` m N 20 m m a) c d C CD .N. c -1 p O O) p C .0 >' a) m a) c '> W O W L ? O Y C L C� c aUic O m m m = 0 dL d 0 m O d 4 c mn '0 c o 0 Z m0) U OT c a) c J c` D L o 6) v) S Z m0) Z S y o v cnn O Lm UU(n 0 J� U> �� U> L (D U) O >. UO c t FT y a >- r r C C O In 0) � O OD O O O N co N O) m m a c O 06 0) w v LL LL. �LO 6q N C O ` f- U) N r- N r M N d � Q' O ` Z 0 O O N I- r O N CO O) co N C O Q' CD J c`6 N N — L — L U U U Z Z N Oca c m C C �Mw C mgr C 3� m CD cJ E U C O U W U E Z O Z O a`) = o a) c 2 opL d-0 rnL m e v a) '0 U v- "° .PL a) 0 Lo -p CO -0 N d 7 U U CO y H O a) V Co C O U p CU d L d U a) VM.. Co O O a) L i V U— d 0) C O E O 'D 'O L p m °- d ": d a) 3 0 d to ` L° >. M d a) a7 d 3 .gym. i cn U U •� 3 C O U H U@ a) >, Q.'O L O (n L y d p O N f0 L L d 0� C X 'X d (0)6 ? C O d d d L a3 Q O 0 C H d 0~ f0)4 > Co 0 Q a d 0)C .d+ 0 (6 a) 0. in U _o c6 N LL w 0 w _O L 'O E U >, N .--� — a o co °- C a) c C 0)•.0-. — Q ° .c U -�c_>„ d "' 2a)2a)c d C c c (LA N o0)— O O U a 0 O d c N N 03m o 0 •tq L f4 cn i 0 (0 m N 0) a) E �O U L c a3 O O i a) U O C d a7 L@ C L C O O a) M C U d` O V 3` d d d 0 N C N C O� L "- O� C d °. c U +L-' 0 y d 0 0 0 C c a) n 0 .d 0� ��v c> � aoiLO cr.U oo �6 0� �Qy o E C m� O U d C 3° H @ (n0 7 '0 _ d °' r •C a r> = O ` d J M c_ p (0 Q U N "° a) >, c J f4 N a) • U. Q' to N O E 3 o m C U E 3L d T d 0 >, a) f9 O U m C 0) N M d -0 .L.+ S c U c o w 0 7 U M d a` as O d a) ELL U L m U i9 c6 WL o c mo ° L p U U U— O o 0 Ec, U) d d U— O a) viaiui�xc'x°3ai�.3offNdca`>.-dmo`F�N E E d -' �'�d� v, 4)@°� m p N 0) o O> O d U M Y 3 0 0 w N Y 7 ca >, a) p C cn L° a) d 03 Nw O- N f6 w-. d O` o (Cp 0 U) O L E O N O o (Cp �7 d U _�C— V) H C U L U O. O .D L U Z O) p C U 0) O C U fD d d a C� L U L L O >, a) i C c w a) LLL U d m d d° O L >, .L.. (6 p 0- O C m m ..L� E E.6~L UL O U.�J y C 00 .0 O d 0 CL c d ° o d L° m °°~ > 0)°ru 3 a �H w a� N o����� �w? 3�' m �HC7 m m o� �cn �' 0 OL w C w d c d c d O o L° � O O N C N '0 d d N •0 N O O' 72 (6 O O f6 N m d m U U m c0 0) c> 0 0) c d 0 > J U) >1 c O 0) C to ` Oddd d >_ Z a) Y C Y C cn J v d > a d O d p .. d -a c 3 s d (n 3 r U) d o c > d p c a X O d cd C E O > O.�. d L �(o >>.> > O L co(0 L Oco O F� C M 4) — d a� r r r Save Our Indian River Lagoon Project Plan 2018 Update, April 2018 6.4. Project Changes 6.4.1 Withdrawals Some of the projects submitted by the local governments as part of the 2017 Plan Supplement were determined to not be cost-effective and/or feasible to implement after further investigation. Therefore, the local governments requested that these projects be removed from the Save Our Indian River Lagoon Project Plan so that the funding could be used for other projects. Table 55 lists the projects that have been removed from the plan at the request of the responsible entity. Table 55: Summary of Year 0 and Year 1 Project Withdrawals In addition, Brevard County reviewed the basins proposed for stormwater treatment in the original plan and identified those basins that should be removed because they could not be easily treated or are basins where the County already has projects. These basins are summarized in Table 56. Prepared by Tetra Tech, Inc. and Closewaters, LLC 3M TN TP Plan Project Name Responsible Entity Lagoon Reduction Reduction Funding (lbs/r (lbs/yr) Holman Road Baffle City of Cape Banana 71 2 $6,248 Box Canaveral Center Street Baffle City of Cape Banana 297 9 $26,136 Box Canaveral International Drive City of Cape Banana 443 4 $34,700 Baffle Box Canaveral Angel Isles Baffle Box City of Cape Banana 131 3 $11,528 Canaveral Cherie Down Park City of Cape Banana 27 9 $2,376 Swale Canaveral Norwood Baffle Box City of Palm Bay Central IRL 1,631 254 $143,528 Retrofit Victoria Pond City of Palm Bay Central IRL 267 42 $23,486 Goode Park City of Palm Bay Central IRL 794 121 $69,872 Florin Pond City of Palm Bay Central IRL 75 11 $6,600 Airport Boulevard Dry City of Melbourne North IRL 99 23 $8,718 Retrofit Nasa Boulevard Pond City of Melbourne Central IRL 1,097 157 $96,532 Retrofit General Aviation Drive City of Melbourne Central IRL 158 10 $13,937 Retrofit L-1 Canal Bank Stabilization Brevard County North IRL 995 383 $87,560 Total - - 6,085 1 1,028 $531,221 In addition, Brevard County reviewed the basins proposed for stormwater treatment in the original plan and identified those basins that should be removed because they could not be easily treated or are basins where the County already has projects. These basins are summarized in Table 56. Prepared by Tetra Tech, Inc. and Closewaters, LLC 3M Save Our Indian River Lagoon Project Plan 2018 Update, April 2018 Table 56: Summary of Stormwater Basin Withdrawals Sub -lagoon Project Name Cost TN Reductions Ibsl r TP Reductions (lbs/yr) Banana Stormwater project in Basin 979 $225,000 3,275 448 Banana Stormwater project in Basin 1280 $175,000 1,735 236 Banana Stormwater project in Basin 1317 $125,000 1,679 290 Banana Stormwater project in Basin 1063 $100,000 1,235 192 Banana Stormwater project in Basin 970 $100,000 1,092 185 Banana Stormwater project in Basin 995 $100,000 1,048 169 Banana Stormwater project in Basin 998 $100,000 1,196 189 Banana Stormwater project in Basin 1309 $100,000 1,016 152 Banana Stormwater project in Basin 754 $100,000 734 95 Banana Stormwater project in Basin 602 $100,000 1,068 109 North IRL Stormwater project in Basin 1430 $175,000 2,255 335 North IRL Stormwater project in Basin 327 $125,000 1,999 283 Central IRL Stormwater project in Basin 1582 $200,000 2,402 443 Total - $1,725,000 20,734 3,126 6.4.2 Revisions The Brevard County Long Point Park project was completed in Year 0 .instead of Year 1. This project constructed a denitrification wall to remove nitrogen from the groundwater flowing from the Long Point campground rapid infiltration wet pond to the IRL. The City of Melbourne Stewart Road dry retention swale retrofit project was incorrectly shown in the 2017 Plan Supplement as located in the Central IRL, and the location has been corrected to the North IRL as part of this 2018 Plan Update. The Brevard County Denitrification Retrofit of Johns Road Pond was incorrectly shown in the 2017 Plan Supplement as located in the Banana River Lagoon, and the location has been corrected to the North IRL as part of this 2018 Plan Update. In addition, the Brevard County Grand Canal muck dredging project was incorrectly shown in the 2017 Plan Supplement as located in the North IRL, and the location has been corrected to the Banana River Lagoon as part of this 2018 Plan Update. All of the unfunded projects from the 2017 Plan Supplement were added back to the plan, except for Banana River Lagoon stormwater projects in basins 754 and 602 (withdrawn as noted above), as part of this 2018 Plan Update. A portion of both the Sykes Creek dredging project and Grand Canal dredging project in Banana River Lagoon were unfunded in the 2017 Plan Supplement. The funding restored as part of this plan update was revised based on updated cost estimates that include treatment of the muck interstitial water (Table 57). In addition, the Turkey Creek muck removal project required dredging as a result of impacts caused by Hurricane Irma in September 2017. The County is pursuing Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) reimbursement for this project where state and federal disaster recovery funding would cover 87.5% of the total cost of additional dredging and the interstitial water treatment and the Save Our Indian River Lagoon Tax Fund would cover the remaining 12.5% of the costs (see Table 54). Prepared by Tetra Tech, Inc. and Closewaters, LLC 3 t% Save Our Indian River Lagoon Project Plan 2018 Update, April 2018 Table 57: Updates to Sykes Creek and Grand Canal Dredging Projects Prepared by Tetra Tech, Inc. and Closewaters, LLC Sykes Creek Grand Canal TN TP TN TP Category Cost Reductions Reductions Cost Reductions Reductions (lbs/r (lbs/r (lbs/r (lbs/yr) Muck Removal $4,705,428 11,676 1,754 $2,440,971 6,057 910 Treatment of $11,248,704 64,278 N/A $15,579,397 89,025 N/A Interstitial Water Total $15,954,132 1 75,954 1 1,754 1 $18,020,368 1 95,0821910 Prepared by Tetra Tech, Inc. and Closewaters, LLC ti N �! �5 91,H m 'o L � a o tD B p D ° (U a O E o o co N �! 4) O r N � N � N d PLO v J c 14 }�1 $i O Z J N [[ b 0)N Y CL' #A CA ■ a ■ • ■ s o d � `w •-� G1 3 � 0 N :t7l U ro F a 0 O k M i 6'8 3: E 2 � R C .a t � o o L %ru O CL E gi O U arm; �i N H a S N CA 2 V co ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ LL Save Our Indian River Lagoon Project Plan 2018 Update, April 2018 Section 7. Summary of the Plan through the 2018 Update The County has been working with its municipalities, FDOT District 5, and Patrick AFB to update total loading estimates to the lagoon and revise the TMDLs for nitrogen and phosphorus using the best available data and more detailed modeling than previously available. Based on this process, five-month TMDLs, which target the load reductions needed during the seagrass growing period (January — May), were proposed in addition to annual TMDLs that protect water quality year-round. These load reductions specifically target water quality conditions needed for restoring lagoon seagrass beds to provide crucial habitat for fish and other marine life. Therefore, as this Save Our Indian River Lagoon Project Plan was developed, the TN and TP reductions from the project types that Reduce incoming load were compared to the five-month TMDLs for each sub - lagoon. After satisfying the five-month TMDLs, annual load reductions for each project were compared to the 12=month TMDLs. In all cases, the projects identified to meet the five-month TMDLs were sufficient to meet the 12 -month TMDLs. As projects are implemented, progress toward meeting the five-month and full -year TMDLs will be tracked. Figure 25 shows the distribution of funding in the original plan versus the 2018 update for each type of project that reduces incoming loading. The majority of funds dedicated to reducing incoming load are directed at projects that improve the treatment of human waste (Figure 26). These projects include several types such as greater treatment of reclaimed water, upgrade of septic systems onsite, conversion from septic to sewer when feasible, and repair of leaky sewer laterals. % Traeatmentof Human Waste, $84,2'26,760 Figure 26: Funding for Reduce Projects Only the projects that reduce external loading to the lagoon, not muck removal or living shorelines, were used to meet the TMDLs. Even though decades of treatment projects to reduce nutrient loads have been completed to date, only the reductions associated with BMAP projects that were completed between January 1, 2010 (the last year of the SWIL model period) and February 29, 2016 (the end of the last BMAP reporting period when the Save Our Indian River Lagoon Project Plan was developed) were included in the load reduction calculations as these projects also provide nutrient load reductions that have occurred after the period of record used to develop the proposed TMDL updates. In Zone A of the Central IRL, the reductions from SJRWMD's C-1 re - diversion project, which was implemented with cost -share funding from FDEP and Brevard County, were also included as this project results in significant load reductions. As shown in Table 58, Table "60, and Table 62, the projects proposed in this plan plus the recently completed BMAP Prepared by Tetra Tech, Inc. and Closewaters, LLC Save Our Indian River Lagoon Project Plan 2018 Update, April 2018 projects and C-1 re -diversion project exceed the five-month reductions called for by the proposed TMDL updates. The total project reductions were also compared to the full year estimated loading to the lagoon from the SWIL model. As shown in Table 59, Table 61, and Table 63, the proposed projects in this plan, as well as the recently completed BMAP projects and C-1 re -diversion project, achieve significant reductions of the overall loading to the lagoon and exceed the full year reductions called for by the proposed TMDL updates. Table 58: Banana River Laqoon Protect Reductions to Meet Five -Month TMDL Project TN Reductions (lbs/r TP Reductions (lbs/yr) Fertilizer Ordinance Implementation 2,945 603 Future Education 2,262 155 Sewer Laterals 412 78 Septic System Removal 5,723 0 Septic System Upgrade 2,144 0 Stormwater Projects 14,701 2,153 BMAP Projects(2010-February 2016 5,303 1,440 Total 33,490 4,429 TMDL Reductions five-month 30,337 2,737 of TMDL Reductions Achieved 110.4% 161.8% Table 59: Banana River Lagoon Project Reductions Compared to Full Year Loadinq Project TN Reductions (lbs/r TP Reductions Ibs/ r Fertilizer Ordinance Implementation 7,068 1,446 Future Education 5,429 372 Sewer Laterals 988 188 Septic System Removal 13,736 0 Septic System Upgrade 5,145 0 Stormwater Projects 35,282 5,168 BMAP Projects 2010-Februa 2016 12,726 3,456 Total 80,374 10,630 Starting Load full ear 477,020 44,269 of Starting Load Reduced 16.8% 24.0% Full -Year TMDL % Reductions 9.0% 9.6% Table 60: North IRL Project Reductions to Meet Five -Month TMDL Project TN Reductions Ibs/ r TP Reductions (lbs/yr) Fertilizer Ordinance Implementation 8,070 1,651 Future Education 6,199 424 WWTF Upgrade for Reclaimed Water 5,987 TBD Septic System Removal 7,891 0 Septic System Upgrade 4,279 0 Stormwater Projects 30,832 4,548 BMAP Projects 2010-Februa 2016 16,983 1 3,180 Total 80,241 9,803 TMDL Reductions five-month 61,447 7,410 of TMDL Reductions Achieved 130.6% 132.3% Prepared by Tetra Tech, Inc. and Closewaters, LLC 32a Save Our Indian River Lagoon Project Plan 2018 Update, April 2018 Table 61: North IRL Project Reductions Compared to Full Year Loadinq Project TN Reductions (lbs/r TP Reductions (lbs/yr) Fertilizer Ordinance Implementation 19,368 3,962 Future Education 14,877 1,018 WWTF Upgrade for Reclaimed Water 14,368 TBD Septic System Removal 18,939 0 Septic System Upgrade 10,270 0 Stormwater Projects 73,996 10,914 BMAP Projects(2010-February 2016 40,758 7,632 Total 192,576 23,526 Starting Load full ear 988,847 99,340 of Starting Load Reduced 19.5% 23.7% Full -Year TMDL % Reductions 11.4% 11.4% Table 62: Central IRL Project Reductions to Meet Five -Month TMDL Project TN Reductions (lbs/r TP Reductions Ibs/ r Fertilizer Ordinance Implementation 8,108 1,659 Future Education 6,228 426 WWTF Upgrade for Reclaimed Water 15,311 TBD Septic System Removal 13,166 0 Septic System Upgrade 5,155 0 Stormwater Projects 14,044 1,803 C-1 Re -Diversion 53,892 6,295 BMAP Projects 2010-Februa 2016 378 243 Total 116,282 10,426 TMDL Reductions five-month)* 67,547 8,151 of TMDL Reductions Achieved 172.1% 127.9% * The TMDL reductions are for Zone A only; however, some of the septic system projects are in Zone SEB. There are sufficient projects to achieve the Zone A reductions without the Zone SEB projects (refer to Section 2.1). Table 63: Central IRL Project Reductions Compared to Full Year Loading Project TN Reductions (lbs/r TP Reductions (lbs/yr) Fertilizer Ordinance Implementation 19,460 3,981 Future Education 14,947 1,023 WWTF Upgrade for Reclaimed Water 36,746 TBD Septic System Removal 31,599 0 Septic System Upgrade 12,371 0 Stormwater Projects 33,705 4,326 C-1 Re -Diversion 129,341 15,108 BMAP Projects(2010-February 2016 908 582 Total 279,077 25,020 Starting Load full year)* 698,937 95,051 of Starting Load Reduced 39.9% 26.3% Full -Year TMDL % Reductions 22.9% 21.5% * The TMDL reductions are for Zone A only; however, some of the septic system are in Zone SEB. There are sufficient projects to achieve the Zone A reductions without the Zone SEB projects (refer to Section 2.1). In addition to the projects that address the external nutrient loading summarized above, the plan includes muck removal, oyster reefs, and vegetated living shoreline projects that will significantly reduce internal nutrient loading within the lagoon itself. The reductions from these projects are summarized in Table 64, along with the percentage of nutrients from muck flux that would be reduced by these projects. Prepared by Tetra Tech, Inc. and Closewaters, LLC 324 Save Our Indian River Lagoon Project Plan 2018 Update, April 2018 Table 64: Muck Removal, Oyster Reef, and Living Shoreline Project Reductions Compared to Nutrient Loadings from Muck Flux Table 65 summarizes all the project types, as well as their estimated costs, TN and TP reductions, and costs per pound of TN and TP removed. The information from this table on the project reductions and cost effectiveness was used to determine the schedule for implementing the projects (see Table 66). Projects that could achieve large reductions quickly, such as fertilizer reductions and WWTF upgrades, as well as the most cost-effective septic to sewer, and stormwater projects were prioritized for earliest implementation. This prioritization allows for the reductions to occur as quickly as possible while best using available funding sources. Project scheduling also considered the timing of upstream reductions with downstream removals, where feasible. The timeline in Table 66 is shown in years after funding from the Save Our Indian River Lagoon sales tax became available. Each year corresponds to the County's fiscal year, which is October 1St through September 30th. Year 1 started on October 1, 2017, which was just before revenues would have begun to accrue if the funding source had been a property tax, as initially considered. When the referendum approved by the voters was a sales tax, collections began in January 2017 and the first revenue check was received by the County in March 2017. Therefore, a plan update was adopted in March 2017 to begin plan implementation in Year 0. Table 66a includes the cost estimates based on 2016 dollars, which were used to develop the plan. Table 66b includes the original cost estimates with inflation starting in Year 2 of the plan. The construction index of 3.25% was used for the inflation value. As noted in Section 4.4.1, an adaptive management approach will be used in the implementation of this plan. As projects are completed and information on the actual construction costs, timeline, and reductions are obtained, the plan will be adjusted, as needed, to ensure that the most cost- effective projects are being used to meet the IRL restoration goals. Prepared by Tetra Tech, Inc. and Closewaters, LLC 325 Mos uito La oon Banana River Lagoon North IRL Central A Project Type TN TP TN TP TN TP TN TP _Jibs/yr) tbs/ r (lbs/r (lbs/r (lbs/r (lbs/r (lbs/r (lbs/yr) Muck Removal 35,000 5,250 287,545 43,197 147,913 22,220 11,033 1,754 Project Reductions Oyster Reefs N/A N/A 10,672 342 10,921 315 3,398 521 Vegetated Living N/A N/A 2,993 1,027 3,056 1,050 1,185 406 Shorelines Total Project Reductions 35,000 5,250 301,210 44,566 161,890 23,585 15,616 2,681 Estimated Muck 97,400 14,600 705,561 106,771 478,824 71,824 42,500 6,250 Flux Loading of Muck Flux 35.9% 36.0% 42.7% 41.7% 33.8% 32.8%F36.7% 42.9% Reduced Table 65 summarizes all the project types, as well as their estimated costs, TN and TP reductions, and costs per pound of TN and TP removed. The information from this table on the project reductions and cost effectiveness was used to determine the schedule for implementing the projects (see Table 66). Projects that could achieve large reductions quickly, such as fertilizer reductions and WWTF upgrades, as well as the most cost-effective septic to sewer, and stormwater projects were prioritized for earliest implementation. This prioritization allows for the reductions to occur as quickly as possible while best using available funding sources. Project scheduling also considered the timing of upstream reductions with downstream removals, where feasible. The timeline in Table 66 is shown in years after funding from the Save Our Indian River Lagoon sales tax became available. Each year corresponds to the County's fiscal year, which is October 1St through September 30th. Year 1 started on October 1, 2017, which was just before revenues would have begun to accrue if the funding source had been a property tax, as initially considered. When the referendum approved by the voters was a sales tax, collections began in January 2017 and the first revenue check was received by the County in March 2017. Therefore, a plan update was adopted in March 2017 to begin plan implementation in Year 0. Table 66a includes the cost estimates based on 2016 dollars, which were used to develop the plan. Table 66b includes the original cost estimates with inflation starting in Year 2 of the plan. The construction index of 3.25% was used for the inflation value. As noted in Section 4.4.1, an adaptive management approach will be used in the implementation of this plan. As projects are completed and information on the actual construction costs, timeline, and reductions are obtained, the plan will be adjusted, as needed, to ensure that the most cost- effective projects are being used to meet the IRL restoration goals. Prepared by Tetra Tech, Inc. and Closewaters, LLC 325 N r-. V d .Q IL 4- 0 E N Lis <D d O F-- w O i a 0 v N C p` d Y �' 3 Q' Z F- N '0 O ° U - ' f- 69 co r ty N 0)r � 69 ' m ~ Q m F- � Ln Ln 69 m ~ m F- O N r E9 O 69 r ti (D O r M N 69 ' ' � d � 00 00O r O Ln 00 69 ' ' ' Q Z <1 Z M O 00 69 Q Z Z O Ln f- 69 Q Z Z 00 O 00 69 ' ' Q Z Z M 69 ' ' Q Z Z N O 00 69 Q Z Z N O 00 69 Q Z Z N O 00 69 ' r,,-4-N� O 69 �- to O O 69 O 69 r O O r N O 6A H 69 N M d L` O 69 ' (WD O M Efl m N Ln O (D It E9 t m N 69 O r M �t 00 N It 69 O N 69 N N N N 00 Ce) It 69 N M 69 Ln (D r Ln 0 qt 69 N M ' m m L- ' w ' (D O m ' O ' In O r ' N O In ' O M M M C Ln (D r N 00 M M (D M It r- r- 00 O O O qt r M O V N M r O O r- O O Ln r N M N O h O Ln O O ~C Ln M �' r r r LO N M r 00 r - ' r I- r Ln O r N r Lf) M M Ll- M M Ln M P- r� r r 3 00 O ' O O fl ' O ' O qt Ln ' O ' 0 0 ' r M M ' O O O O O 0 0 (M O O M co O O O Ln r 0 O O O O O O O 00 O O d' (D O O O 00 O (D O O + N O Ln N 0 O 0 O 0) r O O w Ln fl- M fl- (D 00 N� O Ln N r 00 Ih r- N r- O O M L` O m Ln w H O h C) 't O co N CM CM I- r N O qt 1- N r M I- -;I- O V -: 00 r Ln N 11' r h q7 00 O M O M O N q�i Ln r V 69 E9 69 69 r E9 r 69 r ER 69 E9 69 69 69 69 (fl r 69 N (D 6s 69 E 0- w w N C O to U N N _° co N C o C U .1'0 O (n O CL U ac E C o o C o E N o :? a> X :' N C O N :? N N m ' d > O >>(6 w > N C U C >, N Y y co E LL O N O Q w O O O U 3: U U EL :D '2 E Y c E aU)V E (n E E O o a > > a °? w a c °� >, - >, co c° >, C d °� v � o E o °'o o) c) L) o (u rn U) � c�oa 3 L - 3 E C Y m L aEi 'a m w 0 a` n� a°i � E° �� �° C O a� > o " a� a� m W- (n Z) a) ° U) �, o io m a) � 2 C w E 0 N N E > (n J E J E > (n J a- (B co > J H (0 N m N J R' 4) O J `- R' J - > ° a d w Y .. co co °� LL >, •- > •-• " .O. C C U C C C 3 C C Q' N O C U U U O 3 (6 m .V a m m O z O U n N U .V a 03 m O Z N 0 E o f0 m O Z 0) 0 Y 0 (0 CO O Z N 0 I M O 1 �- O M LO O MI- P- N Cn N O� N O) �! L c N M N M\ � a`fl N O U C I dN N ' N CU) O O O H N M M Cn O O CA CL P �, 1- 00 ami LO Ce)CD LO LO ' � i N 41 m Z f— 't' O M O M N 14, 00 — — d N Ch O O U CA ' M O0 Cl) ' N— 00 ' M O O co O CO 00 CO 0)M Mr O h Z j C6 00 N O — O — cM N M N N � G � Q' ' I- O ' 00 N O ' N O 00 O O 00 O 00 0' C6 C Nt0' C " "t O � 0) 0 0 � V O O LO N O� — 4 r qt It LO M O O O O O O co F— O o U C, q N v M v S O «« LO N cfl O C O P�: O o w V Cl) ER Efl 6191Efl 619.M m 0) E o 69 w a� m �o Y _ V CD L (n L O Vs ) a (i d c 3 C c3: ca c ` C 'Fu00 " 00 is O p) :r 0) 0 L 0) J J J O C Q) C L 0) > 0) ' ' C L N > J Oi C .> L CD > J i 0 O ,� — — O 0) 4) � O N 2 c 0) co C L �' L mL C C M NL C C r N O CO M m O Z 0) M CO O Z 0 U —M p) m O Z 0) U 0.C: C w F- 0 > U I� E E E E E Eo°o $o 12 O Eo o a$ a$ a $a$a$ m m o Ip x 0 0 0 0 O v> O N O N N N N N m m m m m E E E E E m 0 a 00 Q. 0 a 0 00 $a$a$ 00 vovov$ T.2.12 O d o Q m N fn O N men O m N O en m N O fn men N W vi o d $ M t0 e0 t0 N t0 N N tN0 � rn E E E E E @ O a O O m Q O O ao L' 0 °• @ 0 0 OO 2 O 0 O O y V O A y 9 O m S S y L 0 m O u O N S `m m } O m o N w O N men O m oaoao N O en mermen N O N � '� m d Om 7 m7 o O r �$ a r N 10 l0 10 A lC N m m � y y } } ) mm m m N U Am a $$ 000$0 F 21 y y To y O 0 0 �' oQ n� o 0 0 n� o n o. wndNinw `0 o m m m ,606.0 7y7m 7 a m N e E E E �oa E EEU mo ❑ o o a$a$ c r 120[2 'o 'g m `o $ `o o `o a m 66 NW r U U m o a $ a N $ d } m mNM m Wmm N N O yi m N m 10 m yi m r en n u1 to m N vi m Y m } m Y W Y N Y to N 12 m m > Q m mmomo } a 0 0 ao Qom0 a 0 m0 0 o m o c o v$a$a$ 0 E 0 mo �' $ o �i $ $ o d o mp o 0 `00 p 0aoao N pN`p N r r Um o v o M O 0- a. NNM a - } NU IOd tmo 1Nn Nm Nd eNn 1d0 eNn IOm MN LJi N N N m M tOOo N S euNNni N fA E E E E E E m m X Q y y y $ o o g o 0 o Y Q o o 0 0 0 0 = S V S W S _O a 0. � a ^ n• N � M m In a � N In N f9 m� m fn IA In In d d d d d m E E E E E a E O o. o E 20 a$ T O a` E O 20 00.80-.0 E O m O m OO o,5;a�a O O L O OO 'mO O 20 V O To.. o 0 O O O O N O N O N r y N J N N j, to m In N y en m M N fn N� m N d Vf to U E E E E E N}qm E o ` 0 Oo L° @ OOO E co a c 0.0'.0 OO�$a •dmEJO- ❑>a'rydm.._- aN Oo00 O -6 CL -6 oo E m m O m A O d5a tOOIoO N WN N eNA NeNA NeNn LO > tl3� O2 M M� C mfgmS N N3 N NM V (n rLN In } } } } } F U O U O U N E E E E m co C mmOAcF Zm UU 0OO T 00 m OOO$E 0- oa0a ` $ E o O$ Qo 2 v N rJ fO 0 oMaON o O Ey0O M 8 ovJ 10 c; 'b N p 10 0 o Wc O d ym A d lO CJ Um> N mG m0NMON1 m ' O m Y M 7 m m O M dfn Nend� m M= M >mi �- N Ua O rn E O N M d N C V MM a= L) M O m TCo �0 �~ N O C OIGN 6Qm 001 g001 O� mpN J W O UtmO m N Y �Oo€n 1 i. to cvoiUUmm�m IESyv1 o� MmcS�UaaNi a eMn a en rn Wen vi � w °' in J fn U ro � m •o 0 $ 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 g o o o A M m o o o o o o d M d In M fc o o o O o o d v1 mn ' M o rn d o « a 0 10 N m O O N O O M O O M O O O O O OI M O d m O m N 10 n Ih M m N O d 10 N 1� A N n O In M V3 43 fn M N d W fdfi 01 V03 d MM n Nm N en f ♦A � M y C C C O U rL U m N m L m p > L N > L N a > L LO m J N w m y 3 cc Eo -16 a a D z c v m E a z c v o z c v mm3 o z c n s > ci c°i J LL a m co vi m m rn m m cn E O m in = C0 C �p O O O a Ol O V 0 W N Q. y A N O. N O NC d N O O p O N eD h U N , , C C ONi N N O N q O H) C N dj q t0+f H/ H) O m y } to cq O jO 0 Cl Uo q ^a } Z O O m N Q O E2 E yr O N c h N 'CCO O O O C O m N N W N O N N U r m V Ny m m 0_ A a eD D_ O N O> N J prp d q p eD O> N aD O N N U q q _ H L O W 75 m O m 0 O e m OOr) N N N d O N O C N N C N w p 'C 0 C 0 0 I y) q f0 m O 0 ' , Ci 0 a N O, A (L 0 O_ N O p pCj .p V } O O] m U C N x n C C 0= N N S N p Z y q' p q H) N q} H) Ny O 0 CIL U m O N NN m ¢ O C12 m A m C N c C N c C M m .� p0 Ct C d M eOp A , U¢ N y N M m N A C r U N C N A N m , O. C N O_ C OO O. C Cl N O O - N d 7E a N 0 N } e m m¢ N U 0) 0) aM Hi N N 0,H) n H) A } O H N m C N ^ CNO Oi m N O N N N U q q CL UT V a O N r } 00 ¢ d O ymy yyym m A C C N c C N C C 0 O T Om `o U em N U0. A0 0 NN U nfA W 0C. Ai C O OC N O p O OOp Ubf }d U8 0 UC U N0 M e N M1: Oi f0O Hi n q 0 O O N q e ry m m Oct O N m q y O n m m L" L' N O) C OI C Ol C O) C U C N N m U N O ¢ y C O y t+f t+f ren? m A C N C N C t7 .$ p C •- >" 1 oo e > N N Qy Y m U p U tN') O >. N CL ' n 0. OND O. N O p C ri b a d U N C A v O a N a r 0 C A C O C N N» O O N h G} U N U a N Q V) c0 M W N m H) N OO N 0 O A N N N H3 N } O> O w m m H C C C o 0 O N a m O y U o d J N N N "� O a a' A a N m O. 0 a A m a N N 0 N d M OO N C 0 C 0 C C N H) O d 1 O N~ a a U , N C N A C C N O U OD O } c Hi N o m 'D 0 m _N N N O) Hai 0 Hw N 0 N q d H) OD O)M OD O ^ m m m C G C t``O pOp ¢ m�i 75 N Y y p N d •O O OO 0 h O A n A O am O C CrW NmHI O�l0 'Ni N N=Ua tC7 C4 -6 N qhC � N } C m s s N o Q m E � p O c U ` ai N 0 3 O N O C C U NO. C N_ N } SCD N N U U Y J F N m \^ m a e U O M N fA yy Omi H3 AAy C N N H) N C ^ Hi N p U N a N - y (p m y M w^ 0 A m 0 O Cl m q en q O N m m iN0 _d d N C O> A ¢ m m O J C' C Q m O�� m> > 'C ❑ m C .IL .- m Z .G U > 'C O m 14 an d O p C O� A y V C y� DOHYO�a°a>aim O d 10�v o Bo. - m y mU0 d m Nim D (0- a. O N L m0L�" O- >. a N m v N ' N = d4i�L O.. Y >_ 0 N� a >i 2 0' O J m C '- O_ O , m N m 2 A _ K 000 nj m Q N p C O C O r O p h } >. C U)" N j R J J rn m w� 0 i U M m afq y - y Z Hi N m lO C a U W O C 0 0� m U N f9 C N H) d O y{ N ^q O U Ol N N e a�Uw Him j N m d N 9- E'.ma O m iYcy U m U J m n U = 0 A H' H+ d Q" a 0 U o O O O rn A a N o O O t2 lN0 o O N v 0 N N aM m O fO ta7 a O R a O HI w a N M ao a A N H) w It CI N H) o O O O 0 m A N O1 r o q h N d m Z dO yfi E 7> C . o O J > J J O C O J J J J J J C O p L > Ly > L o m m v m Z U c Z U N c Z U m U y m N m j m C r i s f, c� 0 �°- E m - E - m -E m _ E m _. E m ._ m o 0 0 0 d W m1 m r TIQ12Gmo m W 0- `o d� `o d `o d °-� m` "o cd c6 0 0l o 7�n=1 A l0 10 A l0 N N N fW0 � y y } } } E E E E E L° L° E E E m O T r O N M O m 00 W 00 W W 9 W m o' O W m 10 a e N U r n m muNi O m N O N O N 7vmi�'�7cl e' d m A dWi m m e�im�m� m m N �NVl lNO (A O� E E E E E W m La La m La m 20 y y N W m m d da a NaNaN m� m mm a61 0 l0 A t0 A A NDN N(1°O� N � } } y > } m N LO N N N U A O a A A O O a O °, m W iL m O W CL m W d 10 d C W 7 W N � l m N m N m 0 N m 0 Y r W uWi N ruNi A N WyA�n� m N � W� N :3d o N E E E E m o ° a`aWa d` Im d`" ° c o m�m ell GWo M P1 ro m O W m Y O � e 4616 N O G7 m O N m 0 N CI m' N N N m e L W N 1 W 7 e `mre N 7 O O � N d N l7 W n. W ffl W yl W m f)i W vi W fA m Y W M j O N �O W3 N N N N W A !9 N f9 Vi E m E E E d N >. d NO do d N O adad� N O N U v E o'�°I bll W m N o n q ,o m «Y `° N W W t0 p N N NN `U N W p N yi iO W `° N Gy 'A W N to N m n N U N L_ PI W ,cli N r e O 7 O W 7'- O d O W d O N r N NI W V } } } } } N N N m W E E E 10 O ' d N O E O e d O O d m W O v1 d 12 W_ O ul d W to X m V n La U N m m O A W W A n eo •o } v» wi vuNi v vNivwavNi I m GO+I d e rn= m c W 7 rn7"i d o m (L W d N m N N N A Y fAcaIA d cli m m m m m rn m La La @ F Y aOAla N n« N M N OLo d O ON d� Q O' N 2N WdW 12 d W y U N m A �> r O A OWi n 10e Cola0 mr ` �� UU N GI N N 001 O tp t h 10 N M g M W O N y M W p W M W ' N TM m W J F O A « W M N c7 e Ie9 W l7 M O O CL W O W N C) m d m M M m ? W N N N t O j A W W e N N U E E E E E N O N 00 O M OM O c7 O° EEoS p m U >d' O > N th Y m O C �"> N G I a 0 a OaO OO m N m m `O° a mp p d l0 d W d Gp d W d W U 2 A O mmU JE °0 Y �OMi WNN dO N N dN CL UOQ N N U U N E E E 2m E E A E m c2 and z 0N mO 0000d 0r 0r 2 onm•e E oo doo oN mU ay >B= CoR dod0dod 0r ' Eo Eo W e0 m' p C5 a N d oNTSQ. mvoaoao mN mnEJ 0Nal ' ami ami ami w v C to Jm T= d T Vi N J> iA o� O E° en e N N CI e a da me G/f �m } } } } } Fin Ua N am= •r Gti co— m aaNn¢ o .°m o 0o0 ° c T m N gmc�o mo ° �N W dO am9O�B�m U C N� oo o Y FO�a� %W c�NU aati /n �i=a' o.q Mme=w.-d U G3 d m» W W en en J U y Q" W O IQ N t7 O) m m m m m m O O O N N O O m n e7 O1 n N W M N I W e N 10 N A U M to W A N m Vf Iq N 69 M C �° C C c o C m rn K - N K m a d R O d 0: L° m m o> O WLa •� d� m m Z m a _ % `O� NULL Ci J U 7 C U 3 C U U 'C d u W (n m m co O N m 7766.. m pl m m N m d C N N U n d C.1 O N cL O a O. Fl O 'C 0 N til O N O W Q O i } Oq nq N o r t9 fA Vi fry } U e < h O N N d V O } O) m U m Q N N NN.. N >N>.. M 12 w .0 N O) A m >R $ N C d N p 0 O C m y C r N m di e H Q O m m ap O N N FA U a�9 > U m 2 12 N O) O) O) W O N f0 w m 0 m N O n y c0 .m.. n �y+ OI O O O1 C N C N C N m •C O '� m ONi W C O N U N U x a N a O a. O p N} C CO N O N N N q m m o q O m m a0 O N N q U q q r T N f0 T A N Ci m m l0 r cli n z O CL a= cl o IL c n CL c _m i Cl! m` m N m m m q m m O m q m q q O N q } U d 0 V O A oc V N N } C C C T f0 ami ma m m U m m cq Q a m Y o V ao T m N T m d m N o�c N m ymj d r m �vmj —? C C �p OmO O U> aM QOO O aN a ar O Cj c O Aj }d UaU UC - qO q m M_ q q0 m CI O C N d m U N ` o Oi b N }• d ofcl m a m $o m m N m$ 'C U o n >` f7 O T rn 0 r p O) No m d' N co d u. N d a c' C m cd m c v a a �md. m m ¢` o a T U N d 10 N c N c m m m x m o m cO10 n U^ N O U d U e d fA o Q M O 0) m q' a0 O N N q V3 w U Q ,� v e e } m$m °i:5 r m ani l' E m m c m v m' m h < c m Ow m U m e rn i. r n o °' o a m co o m N° N o n 5 w 0 'a Y U ~O m_< (f00 n e V Ud' r C m o O a tq a rn a ao c0 0 o O c U n m civ �: e aD N a d m q m d �A N N W3 ap OI O NW m q N a0 m O q A N q d q a q O q } m m m 12 12 t2 < < T m m m 1. d p O 0 N d r ja c e C N N m C r U a a a w a O fD C (p ~ Om N q Qt q q N M N A q m N y N fA lL c _ to (P m (P aD O N N q q q Z Q e 0 O V V a N r m d m N y U m of c N m 0 3 It) N N a0 T p N T 10 cmy N p A '� N C 1A } 1 \° C .mo O 7 O OF' •�- O m 0 O' O r mp C •^-a m, V? N a a W fNp a n O O N O C U O) q p O N } a _ d V S O u C m a n N m N — T d 15 p OFA- 0 O C ._ d - n C rd m> OC'1p • y m Oa N umi ma V > O �d y C p C O 5 N N (n N i 5 QUO ' d m ta— <_ U' > 0 Y O a Td0 v m ca d 'O m ai' S m d d 1O y- a > m >i0: Cr O d (n O m a m m m Z A A d > m m O S;U d Cl'� (n N O O O 0 a A y a } (n m N m N (T : d U fA V N m N y Z b9 m to N `a t E U d o fw M U $ f; q C cV fA 0 Z d O d 6 N U O) N N U Na U� W to a N 1a N �� m 09 V ym U D Jam~ m q Vi w AU = o\ cn" d U 9 w m5 C } p o o A O , � o q o« IL` o O m m Co O ap cn e ao t7 N m v m N ch r ai -C CO (D in of Cn O) a0 o O w a r aD mCi of cn O n co O ao r M O n co rn m m n (n o c m 1«0- w w ami O w N cA f0 l0 N tl w q a� e8 E o c d m J J c c o rn J J � (rJ c d m J C _ � C m � O C O O C O a 0. �= o m Z U m Z U L m N m Z d U U U Y m V C C d � c m 2• CJ m m C m > ¢] J E a c O U O �- Save Our Indian River Lagoon Project Plan 2018 Update, April 2018 Appendix A: Funding Needs and Leveraging Opportunities Brevard County explored a variety of possible mechanisms to fund the IRL projects in this plan, including: • Special Taxing District approved by referendum to allow an ad valorem tax levy and bonds • Special Act by the legislature allowing ad valorem tax levy by referendum to issue bonds • Local government surtax ('/z cent sales tax) • Altering legislation to allow for Tourist Development Council funding to be used for lagoon restoration • Municipal Service Taxing Unit/Special District • Increased stormwater utility assessment The County placed a referendum on the November 8, 2016 ballot for the '/2 cent sales tax, and this referendum passed by more than 60% of the vote. The Save Our Indian River Lagoon % cent sales tax will generate approximately $34 million per year. The proposed 1 mill increase would have generated approximately $32 million per year, whereas the proposed increase in '/2 mill would have only generated $16 million per year. To implement the projects in a timely manner according to the schedule in Table 66, and to accelerate the projects where possible, the County will seek to use funds generated from the sales tax to leverage matching funding from grants and appropriations and/or pay debt service on bonds. If additional funding is provided through matching funds from other sources, additional projects may be implemented, which would increase the overall plan cost, and/or project timelines may be moved up to allow the benefits of those projects to occur earlier than planned. Examples of other funding programs (many from FDEP 2015) are: o Section 319 grant program — FDEP administers funds received from USEPA to implement projects or programs that reduce nonpoint sources of pollution. Projects or programs must benefit Florida's impaired waters, and local sponsors must provide at least a 40% match or in-kind contribution. Eligible activities include demonstration and evaluation of urban and agricultural stormwater BMPs, stormwater retrofits, and public education. o TMDL grants — Funding for projects related to the implementation of TMDLs may be available through periodic legislative appropriations to FDEP. When funds are available, the program prioritizes stormwater retrofit projects to benefit impaired waters, similar to the Section 319 grant program. o Water management district funding - Florida's five regional water management districts offer financial assistance for a variety of water -related projects, for water supply development, water resource development, and surface water restoration. Assistance may be provided from ad valorem tax revenues or from periodic legislative appropriations for alternative water supply development and Surface Water Improvement and Management projects. The amount of funding available, matching requirements, and types of assistance may vary from year to year. o IRL NEP — The IRL Council funds projects each year through their work plan process (http://www.irlcouncil.com/irl-council.html). o Budget Appropriation — The Florida Legislature may solicit applications directly for projects, including water projects, in anticipation of upcoming legislative sessions. This process is Prepared by Tetra Tech, Inc. and Closewaters, LLC Save Our Indian River Lagoon Project Plan 2018 Update, April 2018 an opportunity to secure legislative sponsorship of project funding through the state budget. o Clean Water State Revolving Fund (SRF) loan program — This program provides low- interest loans to local governments to plan, design, and build or upgrade wastewater, stormwater, and nonpoint source pollution prevention projects. Discounted assistance for small communities is available. Interest rates on loans are below market rates and vary based on the economic wherewithal of the community. The Clean Water SRF is. Florida's largest financial assistance program for water infrastructure. o Florida Rural Water Association Loan Program —This program provides low-interest bond or bank financing for community utility projects in coordination with FDEP's SRF program. Other financial assistance may also be available. o Rural Development Rural Utilities Service Guaranteed and Direct Loans and Grants -The U.S. Department of Agriculture's program provides a combination of loans and grants for Water, wastewater, and solid waste projects to rural communities and small incorporated municipalities. o Small Cities Community Development Block Grant Program— The Florida Department of Economic Opportunity makes funds available annually for water and sewer projects that benefit low- and moderate -income persons. o State Housing Initiatives Partnership Program — Florida Housing administers the program, which provides funds to local governments as an incentive to create partnerships that produce and preserve affordable homeownership and multifamily housing. The program is designed to provide very low, low and moderate income families with assistance. Funding may be used for emergency repairs, new construction, rehabilitation, down payment and closing cost assistance, impact fees, construction and gap financing, mortgage buy -downs, acquisition of property for affordable housing, matching dollars for federal housing grants and programs, and homeownership counseling (http://www.floridahousing.orq/Housin-Partners/LocalGovernments/). o Rural Development Funding — The U. S. Department of Agriculture provides funds that will cover the repair and maintenance of private septic systems. The amount of funds available, as well as the specific purposes for which grants are intended, changes from year to year. Additional details are posted on the Department of Agriculture's website (http://www.rurdev.usda.qov/Home.html). Prepared by Tetra Tech, Inc. and Closewaters, LLC 3M Save Our Indian River Lagoon Project Plan 2018 Update, April 2018 Appendix B: References Alachua County. 2012. Keeping Grass off the Streets Campaign Social Marketing Public Outreach Campaign Final Report. Alachua County Environmental Protection Department. Anderson, Damann L. 2006. A Review of Nitrogen Loading and Treatment Performance Recommendation for Onsite Wastewater Treatment Systems in the Wekiva Study Area. Hazen and Sawyer, P.C. Blue Life Program. Website: https:Hbrevardzoo.org/conservation-programs/blue-life-florida/. Brehm, J. M., Pasko, D. K., Eisenhauer, B.W. 2013. Identifying key factors in homeowner's adoption of water quality best management practices. Environmental Management. 52, 113-122. Brevard County Natural Resources Management Department. 2017. Today's Leaves and Grass Clippings, Tomorrow's Indian River Lagoon Muck. Brevard County Utility Services. 2013. Infrastructure Asset Evaluation. CDM Smith and Taylor Engineering. 2014. Preliminary Concept Design for Artificial Flushing Projects in the Indian River Lagoon. Phase I – Literature Review/Preliminary Site Selection. Prepared for the St. Johns River Water Management District. CDM Smith and Taylor Engineering. 2015. Preliminary Concept Design for Artificial Flushing Projects in the Indian River Lagoon. Phase II – Conceptual Design/Project Refinement. Prepared for the St. Johns River Water Management District. Chang, N., Wanielista, M., Daranpob, A., Xuan, Z., and Hossain, F. 2010. New Performance - Based Passive Septic Tank Underground Drainfield for Nutrient and Pathogen Removal Using Sorption Media. Environmental Engineering Science, Volume: 27 Issue: 6, p. 469- 482. doi: 10.1089/ees.2009.0387. Currin, C.A., Chappell, W.S, and Deaton, A. 2010. Developing alternative shoreline armoring strategies: The living shoreline approach in North Carolina, in Shipman, H., Dethier, M.N., Gelfenbaum, G., Fresh, K.L., and Dinicola, R.S., eds., 2010, Puget Sound Shorelines and the Impacts of Armoring—Proceedings of a State of the Science Workshop, May 2009: U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2010-5254, p. 91-102. Dawes, C.J., D. Hanisak, and J.W. Kenworthy. 1995. Seagrass biodiversity in the Indian River Lagoon. Bulletin of Marine Science 57: 59-66. Dewsbury, B.M., M. Bhat, and J.W. Fourqurean. 2016. A review of seagrass economic valuations: gaps and progress in valuation approaches. Ecosystem Services 18: 68-77. Dietz, M. E, Clausen, J. C., Filchak, K. K. 2004. Education and changes in residential nonpoint source pollution. Environmental Management 34(5), 684-690. Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services (FDACS). Detail Fertilizer Summary by County. From July 2011 to June 2012. Prepared by Tetra Tech, Inc. and Closewaters, LLC 3M Save Our Indian River Lagoon Project Plan 2018 Update, April 2018 http://www.freshfromflorida.com/content/download/3526/22077/DetaiI Fert Sum by Co unty Ju111 June12.pdf. Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services (FDACS). Total Fertilizer and Nutrients by County. From July 2011 to June 2012. http://www.freshfromflorida.com/content/download/2963/18699/TotaI fertilizer Nutrients by County Ju111 June12.pdf. Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services (FDACS). Total Fertilizer and Nutrients for Brevard County for FY2012-2013, FY2013-2014, FY2014-2015, and FY2015-2016. Personal communication on May 17, 2016. Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP). 2010. Florida Friendly Best Management Practices for Protection of Water Resources by the Green Industries. http://fvn.ifas.ufl.edu/pdf/GIBMP Manual Web English 2015.pdf. Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP). 2013a. Basin Management Action Plan for the Implementation of Total Maximum Daily Loads for Nutrients Adopted by the Florida Department of Environmental Protection in the Indian River Lagoon Basin, Central Indian River Lagoon. Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP). 2013b. Basin Management Action Plan for the Implementation of Total Maximum Daily Loads for Nutrients Adopted by the Florida Department of Environmental Protection in the Indian River Lagoon Basin, Banana River Lagoon. Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP). 2013c. Basin Management Action Plan for the Implementation of Total Maximum Daily Loads for Nutrients Adopted by the Florida Department of Environmental Protection in the Indian River Lagoon Basin, North Indian River Lagoon. Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP). 2014. Presentation: Indian River Lagoon (IRL) Basin Management Action Plan (BMAP) New Project Idea Feedback. Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP). 2017. Nitrogen Source Inventory and Loading Estimates for the Contributing Areas of Homosassa Springs Group and Chassahowitzka Springs Group. Division of Environmental Assessment and Restoration, Water Quality Evaluation and Total Maximum Daily Loads Program, Ground Water Management Section. Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP). 2015. Water Resources Funding in Florida. Prepared by the Division of Water Restoration Assistance. Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP). 2016. Reuse Statutory Authority. http://www.dep.state.fl.us/water/reuse/statauth.htm. Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) and Water Management Districts. 2010. Draft Environmental Resource Permit Stormwater Quality Applicant's Handbook: Design Requirements for Stormwater Treatment Systems in Florida. Prepared by Tetra Tech, Inc. and Closewaters, LLC 3 Save Our Indian River Lagoon Project Plan 2018 Update, April 2018 Florida Department of Health (FDOH). 2015. Florida Onsite Sewage Nitrogen Reduction Strategies Study, Final Report. Forand, Nathan, DuBois, Kevin, Halka, Jeff, Hardaway, Scott, Janek, George, Karrh, Lee, Koch, Eva, Linker, Lewis, Mason, Pam, Morgereth, Ed, Proctor, Daniel, Smith, Kevin, Stack, Bill, Stewart, Steve, and Wolinski, Bill. 2014. Recommendations of the Expert Panel to Define Removal Rates for Shoreline Management Projects. Submitted to: Urban Stormwater Work Group Chesapeake Bay Partnership. GPI Southeast. 2010. Final Report Baffle Box Effectiveness Monitoring Project. DEP Contract No. S0236. Prepared for FDEP and Sarasota County Board of County Commissioners. Grabowski, Jonathan H., Brumbaugh, Robert D., Conrad, Robert F., Keeler, Andrew G., Opaluch, James J., Peterson, Charles H., Piehler, Michael F., Powers, Sean P., and Smyth, Ashley R. 2012. Economic Valuation of Ecosystem Services Provided by Oyster Reefs. BioScience, Volume 62 No. 10, p. 900-909. doi:10.1525/bio.2012.62.10.10. Harper, Harvey H. and Baker, David M. 2007. Evaluation of Current Stormwater Design Criteria within the State of Florida. Prepared for FDEP, Contract No. S0108. Hazen and Sawyer. 2015. Evaluation of Full Scale Prototype Passive Nitrogen. Reduction Systems (PNRS) and Recommendations for Future Implementation. Report to the Florida Department of Health. Report: http://www.floridahealth.qov/environmental- health/onsitesewage/research/ documents/rrac/hazensawyervolireportrmall.pdf. Appendices: http://www.floridahealth.qov/environmental- health/onsitesewage/research/ documents/rrac/hazensawVervol0iireportrappend.pdf. Hochmuth, et al. 2016. Managing Landscape Irrigation to Avoid Soil and Nutrient Losses. EDIS Publication: SI -384. htti):Hedis.ifas.ufl.edu/pdffiles/SS/SS58600.pdf. Indian River Lagoon (IRL) National Estuary Program (NEP). 2008. Indian River Lagoon Comprehensive Conservation and Management Plan Update. Kellogg, M. Lisa, Luckenbach, Mark W., Brown, Bonnie L., Carmichael, Ruth H., Cornwell, Jeffrey C., Piehler, Michael F., and Owens, Michael S. 2013. Quantifying Nitrogen Removal by Oysters Workshop Report. Submitted to: NOAA Chesapeake Bay Office. Kroeger, Timm. 2012. Dollars and Sense: Economic Benefits and Impacts from two Oyster Reef Restoration Projects in the Northern Gulf of Mexico. The Nature Conservancy. Lewis, R.R. III, P.A. Clark, W.K. Fehring, H.S. Greening, R.O. Johansson, and R.T. Paul. 1999. The rehabilitation of the Tampa Bay Estuary, Florida, USA, as an example of successful integrated coastal management. Marine Pollution Bulletin 37: 468-473. Morton, T. G., A. J. Gold, and W. M. Sullivan., 1988. Influence of Overwatering and Fertilization on Nitrogen Losses from Home Lawns. Journal of Environmental Quality. vol 17 pg 124- 130. doi:10.2134/jeg1988.00472425001700010019x. Mriganka, D., Gurpal, T. S. 2017. Nitrogen transformations in the mounded drainfields of drip dispersal and gravel trench septic systems. Ecological Engineering. 102. 352-360. Prepared by Tetra Tech, Inc. and Closewaters, LLC Save Our Indian River Lagoon Project Plan 2018 Update, April 2018 Odera, E., Martin, E., & Lamm, A. J. 2015. Southern Florida High Water Users' Public Opinions of Water in Florida. PIE2013/14-11. Gainesville, FL: University of Florida/IFAS Center for Public Issues Education. Okaloosa County Extension. http://okaloosa.ifas.ufl.edu/mowing your lawn.shtml. Accessed: October 5, 2017. Ott, E., Monaghan, P., Wells, O. 2015. Strategies to Encourage Adoption of Stormwater Pond Best Management Practices (BMPs) by Homeowners. OF -IFAS. Praecipio Economics Finance Statistics (PEFS). 2016. The Blue Life Campaign and its Impact on Stormwater-Related Knowledge, Familiarity, Information and Behavior: Evidence from a Survey -Based Analysis of Brevard County Residents (2012 & 2015). Prepared for the Brevard County Board of County Commissioners. Restore America's Estuaries. 2015. Living Shorelines: From Barriers to Opportunities. Arlington, VA. Sayemuzzaman, Mohammad and Ming Ye. August 2015. Estimation of Nitrogen Loading from Converted Septic Systems (2013-14 and 2014-15) to Surface Waterbodies in Port St. Lucie, FL. Department of Scientific Computing, Florida State University. Prepared for the Florida Department of Environmental Protection. Tallahassee, Florida. Schmidt, Casey and Gallagher, Sean. 2017. The denitrification potential and ecosystem services from ten,years of oyster bed restoration in the Indian River Lagoon. Scyphers SB, Powers SP, Heck KL Jr, Byron D. 2011. Oyster Reefs as Natural Breakwaters Mitigate Shoreline Loss and Facilitate Fisheries. PLoS ONE 6(8):e22396. doi:10.1371 /journal. pone.0022396. Seevers, B., Graham, D., Gamon, J., & Conklin, N. 1997. Education through cooperative extension. Albany, NY: Delmar Publishers. St. Johns River Water Management District (SJRWMD). 2016a. Indian River Lagoon: background and history. http://www.sirwmd.com/indianriverlagoon/historV.html. St. Johns River Water Management District (SJRWMD). 2016b. 2011 Supberbloom Report; Evaluating Effects and Possible Causes with Available Data. Prepared by: Indian River Lagoon 2011 'Consortium. Swann, C. P. 2000. A survey of nutrient behavior among residents in the Chesapeake Bay watershed. In: National conference on tools for urban water resource management and protection., (pp 230-237). Chicago, IL, United States Environmental Protection Agency. Tetra Tech. 2015. Letter Report: Nutrient Mitigation Alternatives for Sediment Dewatering. Prepared for Brevard County Natural Resources Management Department. Treat, S.F. and R.R. Lewis III (eds). 2006. Seagrass restoration: success, failure, and the cost of both. Lewis Environmental Services, Inc. 175 pp. Prepared by Tetra Tech, Inc. and Closewaters, LLC 3W Save Our Indian River Lagoon Project Plan 2018 Update, April 2018 Trenholm, Laurie E. and Sartain, Jerry B. 2010. Turf Nutrient Leaching and Best Management Practices in Florida. HortTechnology, vol. 20, no. 1, 107-110. Prepared by the University of Florida (UF). Trefry, John H. 2013. Presentation on Sediment Accumulation and Removal in the Indian River Lagoon. Presentation to the Environmental Preservation and Conservation Senate Committee. Marine and Environmental Systems, Florida Institute of Technology. Trefry, John H. 2016. Personal communication. University of Florida (UF) College of Engineering. 2011. Quantifying Nutrient Loads Associated with Urban Particulate Matter (PM, and Biogenic/Litter Recovery through Current MS4 Source Control and Maintenance Practices. Prepared for Florida Stormwater Association Educational Foundation. University of Florida (UF) Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences (IFAS). 2012. Warm -Season Turfgrass N Rates and Irrigation BMP Verification. Prepared for the Florida Department of Environmental Protection. University of Florida (UF) Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences (IFAS). 2013a. Using Reclaimed Water to Irrigate Turfgrass — Lessons Learned from Research with Nitrogen. Document SL389. University of Florida (UF) Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences (IFAS). 2013b. Urban Turf Fertilizer Rule for Home Lawn Fertilization. Document ENH1089. http://edis.ifas.ufl.edu/ep353. University of Florida (UF) Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences (IFAS). 2017. EDIS SL181- B. Tissue Testing and Interpretation for Florida Turfgrasses. http://edis.ifas.ufl.edu/ep539. University of Florida (UF) Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences (IFAS). 2016. Florida Friendly Landscaping, Low Impact Development. http://fvn.ifas.ufl.edu/Iowimpactdev.htm. United States Census Bureau (USCB). 2015. Persons per household, 2010-2014. http://www.census.gov/quickfacts/table/PST045215/00. United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 2002. Onsite Wastewater Treatment Manual. EPA 625/R-00/008. National Risk Management Research Laboratory, Office of Water, U.S.. Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. United State Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 2005. Riparian Buffer Width, Vegetative Cover, and Nitrogen Removal Effectiveness. United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 2007. Biological Nutrient Removal Processes and Costs. Fact Sheet EPA823-R-07-002. Office of Water. Wanielista, Marty, Goolsby, Matt, Chopra, Manoj, Chang, Ni -Bin, and Hardin, Mike. 2011. Green Residential Stormwater Management Demonstration: An Integrated Stormwater Management and Graywater System to Reduce the Quantity and Improve the Quality of Residential Water Discharges. University of Central Florida Stormwater Management Academy. Prepared for the Florida Department of Environmental Protection. Prepared by Tetra Tech, Inc. and Closewaters, LLC 3M Save Our Indian River Lagoon Project Plan 2018 Update, April 2018 Wanielista, Marty. 2015. A Biosorption Activated Media (BAM) Called Bold & Gold (B&G) to Reduce Nutrients in Stormwater. Presentation. University of Central Florida. zu Ermgassen, P:, . Hancock, B., DeAngelis, B., Greene, J., Schuster, E., Spalding, M., Brumbaugh, R. 2016. Setting objectives for oyster habitat restoration using ecosystem services: A manager's guide. The Nature Conservancy, Arlington VA. 76pp. Prepared by Tetra Tech, Inc. and Closewaters, LLC Save Our Indian River Lagoon Project Plan 2018 Update, April 2018 Appendix C: Maps of the Septic System Removal Areas Identified in the Original Plan Prepared by Tetra Tech, Inc. and Closewaters, LLC Save Our Indian River Lagoon Project Plan 2018 Update, April 2018 The septic systems within the unincorporated County were evaluated for connection to the central sewer system based on distance to a surface waterbody (ditch, canal, creek, or the IRL). Neighborhoods with a large number (approximately 50% or more) of septic systems within 55 yards of a surface water have the greatest impact on water quality and systems more than 219 yards from a surface water contribute very little TN loading. In Figure C-1 through Figure C-3, the septic systems located within 55 yards of a surface. waterbody are shown in the darkest blue and those systems that are further than 219 yards from a surface waterbody are shown in the lightest blue. On each map, the neighborhood focus areas that were evaluated for potential septic system removal are outlined in black. Those focus areas that were determined to be the most cost-effective for connection, and are therefore recommended for funding in this plan, are outlined in green. The septic systems within the cities were also evaluated for potential connection to the sewer system. This evaluation was conducted by identifying those areas that had at least 50% of the septic systems within 55 yards of a surface waterbody. The scoring of these systems, as described in Section 4.1.4, were also considered. The septic systems with the highest (worst) score are shown in the darkest blue in Figure C-4 through Figure C-10. The neighborhood focus areas proposed for septic system removal as part of this plan within the cities are outlined in green.. Prepared by Tetra Tech, Inc. and Closewaters, LLC 341 Save Our Indian River Lagoon Project Plan 2018 Update, April 2018 SOUTH BEACHES (NORTH) - SHORT TERM OPPORTUNITIES •• Vit. • `• - ,i •.' It 0 0.2 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6 • �.{• •� .r .-.t•.. Miles -v . S �8 w P .� . 14 f' 1 " •1, t s :1A •+s � i • +::1 � atlanrc Ocean • iii•• • �t . •Moro - • ,y .�• tea �.�w =:� w• - i R Oam.1:.�1916 Septic Tank Rating Q South Beaches Focus Area (Cost Effective) 00 • Septic tanks <55 yards from water South Beaches Focus Area f • Septic tanks 55-219 yards from waterrevs rd Brevard County Sewer Service Area COUNTYPA o Septic tanks >219 yards from water Drainage Divide Natural an gement Notes: The focus areas outlined in green are the most cost-effective and are recommended as part of this plan. The septic system locations are from the FDOH permit database. This database includes all septic systems permitted since 1980 or that have received repair permits since that time. Figure C-1: Map of South Beaches Priority Septic System Areas Prepared by Tetra Tech, Inc. and Closewaters, LLC 342 Save Our Indian River Lagoon Project Plan 2018 Update, April 2018 SOUTH CENTRAL EAST - SHORT TERM OPPORTUNITIES • — 0 0.3 0.6 1.2 1.8 2.4 ,,,rr�� ��.�" • Miles N W e � a , • S is 1! F" 4 = • ,wa�rrux e' M1YfaM uullgl YM�.�n Septic Tank Rating South Central East Focus Area (Cost Effective) • Septic tanks <55 yards From water South Central East Focus Area I/ • Septic tanks 55-219 yards from waterBrevard County Sewer Service Area revs rd e Septic tanks >219 yards from water P&COUNTY Drainage Divide Natural Resources Management Notes: The focus areas outlined in green are the most cost-effective and are recommended as part of this plan. The septic system locations are from the FDOH permit database. This database includes all septic systems permitted since 1980 or that have received repair permits since that time. Figure C-2: Map of South Central Priority Septic System Areas Prepared by Tetra Tech, Inc. and Closewaters, LLC 30 Save Our Indian River Lagoon Project Plan 2018 Update, April 2018 SYKES CREEK - MERRITT ISLAND - SHORT TERM OPPORTUNITIES 0 0.3 0.6 1.2 1.8 2.4 Miles N > W+ E S 16 r. ..10 V onn: �m�rmre Septic Tank Rating Sykes Creek Focus Area (Cost Effective) • Septic tanks <55 yards from water Sykes Creek Focus Area • Septic tanks 55-219 yards from water neva rd V Septic tanks >219 yards from water Brevard County Sewer Service Area C Q U M T Y Drainage Divide Natural Resources Management Notes: The focus areas outlined in green are the most cost-effective and are recommended as part of this plan. The septic system locations are from the FDOH permit database. This database includes all septic systems permitted since 1980 or that have received repair permits since that time. Figure C-3: Map of Sykes Creek Priority Septic System Areas Prepared by Tetra Tech, Inc. and Closewaters, LLC 344 f f • I t,��ifi� � .�. • `ti•h �E t ,•� • �.w �c _ • EFMf_it • b.aV(IN GwnfNl• . f .\ 2 . 9 rnrki� 2 0 0.3 0.6 1.2 1.8 2.4 Miles N > W+ E S 16 r. ..10 V onn: �m�rmre Septic Tank Rating Sykes Creek Focus Area (Cost Effective) • Septic tanks <55 yards from water Sykes Creek Focus Area • Septic tanks 55-219 yards from water neva rd V Septic tanks >219 yards from water Brevard County Sewer Service Area C Q U M T Y Drainage Divide Natural Resources Management Notes: The focus areas outlined in green are the most cost-effective and are recommended as part of this plan. The septic system locations are from the FDOH permit database. This database includes all septic systems permitted since 1980 or that have received repair permits since that time. Figure C-3: Map of Sykes Creek Priority Septic System Areas Prepared by Tetra Tech, Inc. and Closewaters, LLC 344 Save Our Indian River Lagoon Project Plan 2018 Update, April 2018 MELBOURNE - SHORT TERM OPPORTUNITIES Miles fg�jA .. ; l a• . 7. c 1 T. J •�.__ J• c«,;f�.v •.• #�i•.�•;wSaar; t'►i - „- � Imo• 9,, �. Or- y - 4 •�i• �6'Y:,•' • :•'. �� • • �__ �' �� � _�r.0-"'uu a� yam. '�r•�r� trF —' �� .,J•�`y. •fix _ f •' L IR '..; 73 TI V. N oil, Ifi11L .fj� i i T '„ r_ +rte • �% - t r r _ wn >�row Septic Tank Rating ® Melbourne Focus Area (Cost Effective) • Septic tanks <55 yards from water 0 Melbourne Sewer Service Area 1pp U �• • Septic tanks 55-219 yards from water Palm Bay Service Area ef� terdotvTr a Septic tanks >219 yards from water Brevard County Sewer Service Area Natural Resources Management Drainage Divide Note: The septic system locations are from the FDOH permit database. This database includes all septic systems permitted since 1980 or that have received repair permits since that time. Figure C-4: Map of City of Melbourne Priority Septic System Areas Prepared by Tetra Tech, Inc. and Closewaters, LLC 34EI Save Our Indian River Lagoon Project Plan 2018 Update, April 2018 ROCKLEDGE - SHORT TERM OPPORTUNITIES I? B S i i , IM:MI v� : C. J IW yrw•`G 0 0.25 0.5 Miles -t--- • I • �(• • 1 f—F' � ' I•R14A�.T �F' • M N9.r r �,H2R4VN�tll.l.M i Y\ _t i l� If•r i�•T t.- CW6 G .. T V c ,•fel+, "i S }. • • �rt.e•I,�—a"?t S�-rtu,.� ifs ',Z • CMlJN 4 ti •yN�� s xx ' Sf•'t �, •,R:rA,cNr � �.. .� � 1 � 3 £�ylrHy�i; � o%`•i.rl G � �I,WwNJ 1, t✓4 . r.urwl; 'i i.if�.'w?r .n.w�i." .nn..J`� � • vw.r-t+;Y • • �.'�., .� �' � ,ter 1 � ,�„�� L ••#ar i -i:wic;, pppjjj � O � % � .� � 1 3 • I�� • j • s s�: u^^•� �_ 2 ••�rtnroN•.���•wr�'17"411T """Y• �"_ w��. .•2.i.i !'sy• _•'T.. ��_,._ fi � '„"'"�a...�• .._� Sig= 4 s9.• �'1 V ::�: :: :b..a r .: ••: t9 bbl., x- ;�. Z' : =r.,:d. �s • ��: IL' lis' '!.; ,:., • :. ¢+p S>Ya M n.r7�c4'vw rw .o�. uw �•it� N.uM.v..=�• ; wYYy�ffi'4. i� 'y'�k � •l� 'W,.r ayM i _ w Y y44 W�uwo...�r�• j 1 •�' �s'S, x ^i I � � _ � s St i a aur �4T� ,r,•iawr � J� moi• #q,ff : � , � ! r ,� ` I 4.j � •�tJiY \ ♦rvn �� f ,sa[+.� 1{,i's�f, •�• ,�3 <.� •• a'Y � �$'s t ter, � ���` '�«•�Y 3�. �{ '�'%�3� .�'1 • • "I- , s..^• s' ,ori �. �Psa. ~ s q _ 71Si� 4 Septic Tank Rating Q Rockledge Focus Area (Cost Effective) 0- rwx-'4 • Septic tanks <55 yards from water Rockledge Sewer Service Area I e Septic tanks 55-219 yards from water Jreyard P Y ® Brevard County Sewer Service Area C Septic tanks >219 yards from water Drainage Divide Note: The septic system locations are from the FDOH permit database. This database includes all septic systems permitted since 1980 or that have received repair permits since that time. Figure C-5: Map of City of Rockledge Priority Septic System Areas Prepared by Tetra Tech, Inc. and Closewaters, LLC 346 Save Our Indian River Lagoon Project Plan 2018 Update, April 2018 COCOA- SHORT TERM OPPORTUNITIES W L .¢nils• QCocoa Focus Areas (Cost Effective) Septic Tank Rating Cocoa Focus Areas • Septic tanks <55 yards from water QCocoa Sewer Service Area revard • Septic tanks 55-219 yards from water a o u N T r • Septic tanks >219 yards from water ® Brevard County Sewer Service Area Natural Resources Management Drainage Divide Note: The septic system locations are from the FDOH permit database. This database includes all septic systems permitted since 1980 or that have received repair permits since that time. Figure C-6: Map of City of Cocoa Priority Septic System Areas Prepared by Tetra Tech, Inc. and Closewaters, LLC 31*7 Save Our Indian River Lagoon Project Plan 2018 Update, April 2018 TITUSVILLE - SHORT TERM OPPORTUNITIES Septic Tank Rating Q Titusville Focus Areas (Cost Effective) Q t, • Septic tanks <55 yards from water Titusville Focus Areas s Septic tanks 55-219 yards from water I Titusville Sewer Service Area �reVard Brevard County Sewer Service Area nM,.M Vie% e Septic tanks >219 yards from water Drainage Divide Note: The septic system locations are from the FDOH permit database. This database includes all septic systems permitted since 1980 or that have received repair permits since that time. Figure C-7: Map of City of Titusville Priority Septic System Areas Prepared by Tetra Tech, Inc. and Closewaters, LLC 30 Save Our Indian River Lagoon Project Plan 2018 Update, April 2018 PALM BAY - SHORT TERM OPPORTUNITIES -- •: -fie 1 _ • 0 - Q .• .J'• ' V • •• r t � � d • - a. h TP 41 +� � ar .: i^.-. tea: 1 f � •. .-tom_ • `moi - • r • I• .•,,.•i. {-'- At • i• \41 It b 1� 1i iMt `�A M • i r • �• 1 F +�n>�i•rkt!'It�rtiwVr I • • • 0 0.5 1 ` • � �M!lea Septic Tank Rating =Patrn Bay focusyvea(Cost E(fective) o.z +xmr• @ 5=ptic tanks d5 yams from water � � Patrn Bay $e1vICE Area Fr • Septic tanks 55 -219 yards from water 0 Melbourrm S"orS—ioa Area reva rd Q C rdy Sr.•m Serwoe Area o w�tiwr� O WVc tanks X219 yards from watLrNa•a, � Orainapo fhwdo Note: The septic system locations are from the FDOH permit database. This database includes all septic systems permitted since 1980 or that have received repair permits since that time. Figure C-8: Map of City of Palm Bay Priority Septic System Areas Prepared by Tetra Tech, Inc. and Closewaters, LLC 30 Save Our Indian River Lagoon Project Plan 2018 Update, April 2018 PALM BAY - SHORT TERM OPPORTUNITIES SC. - ljrr � lam_ z ;V'..U]' � _ ��• �..�, }��ju,y�''.�.� -� E. �.�1 �;.:`i �l �� .•..ter u.�,. Tic 'a �+-� � �.�•'��..;�..'+•��.:. .a„1 4� � • � fit' /{ •+��� a` vex - T f !• .rr ,,;�. -� e.�`�- � Ii�i� t wM� _10- ..r*��.N��'. •�".. •c+•�,t�"� — � 1t a •«.'�i' �.J=���--ice_•_ � 5 M �ii �� _ z� 7 V _�,.,n�.r`„�'aewt.:, ... %•ehrnn'•.:�� s �"�I .. . .a.!�-:- _ � .� L 1 Nom. �w„ _ � ,rv,.. ,>^,�. • � r,`s�:�--:` �`� �I.i (1 �•,•!tiY• f 1'.t��` �• p a `'orf .E• �1411�Z4.•i 9�K�• ati .irk :: 1 rip v ' wy �. AV =44A j? ��e � � �� f' X1•..7 9 �,z*_ Jam' •� • �s.d• rn � �.�j. �_ r f='�w w:�� .,� :• 4.», .:y : ,-•:VIS Miles Septic Tank RatingFocusone Palm Bay Focus Area (Cost E%eclrve) ,V2 M Septic tanks < 55 yards from water U Palm Bay Service Area ( O Septic tanks >219 yards from water Q Melbourne Sewer Service Area reva rd O Septic tanks 55.219 yards from water County Sewer Service Area _ o e_-._. Palm Bay Hookup Priorities Drainage Divide Note: The septic system locations are from the FDOH permit database. This database includes all septic systems permitted since 1980 or that have received repair permits since that time. Figure C-9: Map of City of Palm Bay Septic System Areas Near Sewer Lines Prepared by Tetra Tech, Inc. and Closewaters, LLC Save Our Indian River Lagoon Project Plan 2018 Update, April 2018 WEST MELBOURNE -SHORT TERM OPPORTUNITIES J .__. • •:i; • o oss os MffAwNwC=== Miles 7- LCP HIBISCUS 00 It I ;a. J •a=.. 'I'tl�i � It. =(•� 14 i EBER �f•' j It sad �� ,:� _ �. :(.. •--� +�'� ;r� :_,,' � ..• t' CIi6al•i� :is :.:"i _ _ - A+udBAY _,C71iti��� �_1�:. = Ii''TC.'t�iR�Hi�� Cal �i�'1 t�''�.� �iq ' I • Ir �,�' � .-.�r�'�lyl.'ta�z .• •!5"t�i�� �ti����1 I'1':- � f �Y • I �� S - 1 � k' :•a� oAre w6ma 'a_r,rm_m sa.1 g '01 Septic Tank Rating QWest MOW— Focus Area (Cost Melt-) f� ' • a.Ore Yn.• cSs wra tq.. rrre. i t Merooume Sewer Service Arca • s°°rsmwso-revw.mWest MelbournOSOwerServgoArea Arevard O O M f Drainage Divide � s•.,c raga.»,Orml. sa�..r. r••vw+.. Note: The septic system locations are from the FDOH permit database. This database includes all septic systems permitted since 1980 or that have received repair permits since that time. Figure C-10: Map of City of West Melbourne Priority Septic System Areas Prepared by Tetra Tech, Inc. and Closewaters, LLC aft Save Our Indian River Lagoon Project Plan 2018 Update, April 2018 Appendix D: Summary of Stormwater Projects Identified in the Original Plan Prepared by Tetra Tech; Inc. and Closewaters, LLC Save Our Indian River Lagoon Project Plan 2018 Update, April 2018 Table D-1: Summary of TN Reductions from Stormwater Proiects in Banana River Laaoon Basin Five -Month TN Load (lbs/yr) TN % Efficiency Five -Month TN Reductions (lbs/yr) Annual TN Load (Ibs/yr) TN % Efficiency Annual TN Reductions (Ibs/yr) 979 47549 5" 952 777 4a% 375 4285 4-182 55k 505 355 4" 435 973 1,070 55% 588 4,552 45% 2,048 963 1,030 55% 566 4,649 45% 2,092 905 925 55% 509 2,540 45% 1,143 901 844 55% 464 3,685 45% 1,658 522 721 55% 397 1,766 45% 795 4347 747- 55y6 395 335 450 4767-9 650 707 55% 389 2,766 45% 1,245 1366 680 55% 374 3,295 45% 1,483 1343 625 55% 344 3,084 45% 1,388 492 613 55% 337 2,266 45% 1,020 476 596 55% 328 2,005 45% 902 1329 579 55% 319 2,916 45% 1,312 1350 577 55% 317 2,330 45% 1,049 815 559 55% 307 1,551 45% 698 992 554 55% 305 2,764 45% 1,244 388 544 55% 299 3,089 45% 1,390 1304 542 55% 298 2,562 45% 1,153 989 533 55% 293 2,290 45% 1,030 539 532 55% 293 2,474 45% 1,113 1071 522 55% 287 2,403 45% 1,082 350 518 55% 285 1,972 45% 888 1337 516 55% 284 2,492 45% 1,121 4563 543 5"0 282 2-,7-44 450 4 235 1265 505 55% 278 1,652 45% 743 1222 502 55% 276 1,974 45% 888 1066 491 55% 270 2,575 45% 1,159 1172 491 55% 270 1,893 45% 852 820 490 55% 269 1,327 45% 597 979 498 550 369 24, 217 4,9% 4-,992 995 477 550 262 2L28 4&°k 4 ;948 498 472 5" 268 2;658 4" 4 96 451 471 55% 259 2,595 45% 1,168 943 469 55% 258 1,574 45% 708 821 463 55% 254 1,394 45% 627 705 460 55% 253 1,445 45% 650 4389 457 550 254 257 45°6 4-46 497 438 55% 579 2,374 45% 1,068 754 438 5" 578 4,&U 45% 734 682 435 55% 574 2;374 450 4_68 Note: Projects with strikethrough were removed as part of the 2018 Plan Update because they could not be easily treated or are basins where the County and local governments already have projects. Prepared by Tetra Tech, Inc. and Closewaters, LLC Save Our Indian River Lagoon Project Plan 2018 Update, April 2018 Table D-2: Summary of TP Reductions from Stormwater Projects in Banana River Lagoon Basin Five -Month TP Load (Ibs/yr) TP % Efficiency Five -Month TP Reductions (lbs/yr) Annual TP Load (lbs/yr) TP % Efficiency Annual TP Reductions (lbs/yr) 97-9 243 65 0 439 9W 45°0 448 4339 452 65-% 99 525 4"0 236 973 147 65% 96 691 45% 311 963 142 65% 92 880 45% 396 905 127 65% 83 395 45% 178 901 116 65% 76 435 45% 196 522 99 65% 65 245 45% 110 434-7 99 65-% 64 644 45% 399 650 97 65% 63 317 45% 143 1366 94 65% 61 537 45% 242 1384 85 65% 55 315 45% 142 492 84 65% 55 260 45% 117 476 82 65% 53 240 45% 108 1329 80 65% 52 469 45% 211 1350 79 65% 52 368 45% 165 815 77 65% 50 250 45% 113 992 76 65% 50 433 45% 195 388 75 65% 49 307 45% 138 1304 75 65% 49 385 45% 173 989 73 65% 48 244 45% 110 539 73 65% 48 258 45% 116 1071 72 65% 47 319 45% 144 350 71 65% 46 238 45% 107 1337 71 65% 46 413 45% 186 4063 74 65% 46 426 451% 492 1265 70 65% 45 219 45% 98 1222 69 65% 45 380 45% 171 1066 68 65% 44 413 45% 186 1172 68 65% 44 274 45% 123 820 67 65% 44 249 45% 112 9-0 67 65°{0 44 440 450A 495 995 66 65°40 43 37-6 45°6 469 999 65 65°6 42 428 45% 4-99 451 65 65% 42 270 45% 121 943 65 65% 42 200 45% 90 821 64 65% 41 274 45% 123 705 63 65% 41 210 45% 95 4309 63 6&% 44 338 45%_ 482 497 60 65% 39 249 45% 112 7-54 68 65°6 39 244 450 95 602 60 65°6 39 244 45$6 489 Note: Projects with strikethrough were removed as part of the 2018 Plan Update because they could not be easily treated or are basins where the County and local governments already have projects. Prepared by Tetra Tech, Inc. and Closewaters, LLC 3N Save Our Indian River Lagoon Project Plan 2018 Update, April 2018 Table D-3: Summary of TN Reductions from Stormwater Projects in North IRL Basin Five -Month TN Load (lbs/yr) TN % Efficiency Five -Month TN Reductions (lbs/yr) Annual TN Load (lbs/yr) TN % Efficiency Annual TN Reductions (lbs/yr) 1273 1,150 55% 633 4,364 45% 1,964 1298 1,136 55% 625 3,810 45% 1,715 44391 4,435 6" 624 5-044 45°4 2-,2-55 1349 1,094 55% 602 4,601 45% 2,070 1439 1,044 55% 574 3,141 45% 1,413 1445 1,042 55% 573 3,319 45% 1,493 626 985 55% 542 3,560 45% 1,602 454 1 919 55% 505 4,435 45% 1,996 1416 915 55% 503 3,997 45% 1,799 1324 911 55% 501 3,160 45% 1,422 1077 895 55% 492 3,748 45% 1,687 1256 870 55% 478 3,520 45% 1,584 1335 789 55% 434 3,784 45% 1,703 1419 780 55% 429 4,155 45% 1,870 1409 764 55% 420 3,000 45% 1,350 1377 717 55% 395 3,375 45% 1,519 32:� q1,3 5" 392 4;443 4" 4 569 1342 696 55% 383 2,608 45% 1,174 219 662 55% 364 2,125 45% 956 47 660 55% 363 2,996 45% 1,348 1434 656 55% 361 2,071 45% 932 1151 655 55% 360 2,348 45% 1,057 1078 655 55% 360 2,778 45% 1,250 1399 651 55% 358 3,488 45% 1,570 1301 651 55% 358 2,277 45% 1,025 1368 646 55% 355 2,912 45% 1,311 408 641 55% 352 2,620 45% 1,179 338 633 55% 348 4,226 45% 1,902 1367 618 55% 340 2,316 45% 1,042 1384 618 55% 340 2,051 45% 923 1318 609 55% 335 2,497 45% 1,124 155 594 55% 327 2,553 45% 1,149 289 590 55% 324 2,471 45% 1,112 193 583 55% 321 2,925 45% 1,316 1441 577 55% 762 2,298 45% 1,034 660 576 55% 761 1,876 45% 844 952 575 55% 759 2,780 45% 1,251 Note: Projects with strikethrough were removed as part of the 2018 Plan Update because they could not be easily treated or are basins where the County and local governments already have projects. Prepared by Tetra Tech, Inc. and Closewaters, LLC 3M Save Our Indian River Lagoon Project Plan 2018 Update, April 2018 Table D-4: Summary of TP Reductions from Stormwater Projects in North IRL Basin Five -Month TP Load (lbs/yr) TP % Efficiency Five -Month TP Reductions (lbs/r) Annual TP Load (lbs/yr) TP % Efficiency Annual TP Reductions (Ibslyr) 1273 158 65% 103 640 45% 288 1298 156 65% 102 511 45% 230 4430 456 65°% 402 -7-45 45-% 335 1349 151 65% 98 721 45% 324 1439 144 65% 93 407 45% 183 1445 144 65% 93 441 45% 198 626 136 65% 88 430 45% 193 454 126 65% 82 671 45% 302 1416 126 65% 82 508 45% 229 1324 125 65% 82 391 45% 176 1077 123 65% 80 641 45% 289 1256 120 65% 78 533 45% 240 1335 109 65% 71 578 45% 260 1419 107 65% 70 594 45% 267 1409 105 65% 68 455 45% 205 1377 99 65% 64 546 45% 246 317 03 65% 64 629 4"% 2-93 1342 96 65% 62 386 45% 174 219 91 65% 1 59 251 45% 113 47 91 65% 59 309 45% 139 1434 90 65% 59 248 45% 112 1151 90 65% 59 314 45% 141 1078 90 65% 59 416 45% 187 1399 90 65% 58 569 45% 256 1301 90 65% 58 342 45% 154 1368 89 65% 58 445 45% 200 408 88 65% 57 378 45% 170 338 87 65% 57 418 45% 188 1367 85 65% 55 324 45% 146 1384 85 65% 55 315 45% 142 1318 84 65% 54 328 45% 148 155 82 65% 53 271 45% 122 289 81 65% 53 495 45% 223 193 80 65% 52 440 45% 198 1441 79 65% 52 331 45% 149 660 79 65% 52 470 45% 212 952 79 65% 51 471 45% 212 Note: Projects with strikethrough were removed as part of the 2018 Plan Update because they could not be easily treated or are basins where the County and local governments already have projects. Prepared by Tetra Tech, Inc. and Closewaters, LLC 3M Save Our Indian River Lagoon Project Plan 2018 Update, April 2018 Table D-5: Summary of TN Reductions from Stormwater Projects in Central IRL Note: Projects with strikethrough were removed as part of the 2018 Plan Update because. they could not be easily treated or are basins where the County and local governments already have projects. Table D-6: Summary of TP Reductions from Stormwater Projects in Central IRL Five -Month TN % Five -Month TN Annual TN TN % Annual TN Basin TN Load Efficienc y 'Reductions Load (lbs/yr) Efficiency Reductions lbs! r Ibs/ r (lbs/yr) 1562 1,975.9 55.0% 1,086.8 7,365.0 45.0% 3,314.2 1762 1,652.4 55.0% 908.8 7,061.1 45.0% 3,177.5 1615 1,397.6 55.0% 768.7 6,256.6 45.0% 2,815.5 45921 47392-9 1 &-.-"0 7-"4 1 6,338.4 4&"-1 2 492: Note: Projects with strikethrough were removed as part of the 2018 Plan Update because. they could not be easily treated or are basins where the County and local governments already have projects. Table D-6: Summary of TP Reductions from Stormwater Projects in Central IRL Note: Projects with strikethrough were removed as part of the 2018 Plan Update because they could not be easily treated or are basins where the County and local governments already have projects. Prepared by Tetra Tech, Inc. and Closewaters, LLC 3M Five -Month TP % Five -Month TP Annual TP TP % Annual TP Basin TP Load Efficiency Reductions Load (lbs/yr) Efficiency Reductions lbs/ r lbs/ r lbs/ r 1562 272.1 65.0% 176.9 997.8 45.0% 449.0 1762 227.5 65.0% 147.9 1,093.3 45.0% 492.0 1615 192.4 65.0% 125.1 866.6 45.0% 390.0 4.,-g2 494 6.&°,61 4247 1 9844 454% 1 443- Note: Projects with strikethrough were removed as part of the 2018 Plan Update because they could not be easily treated or are basins where the County and local governments already have projects. Prepared by Tetra Tech, Inc. and Closewaters, LLC 3M Save Our Indian River Lagoon Project Plan 2018 Update, April 2018 Appendix E: Seagrasses Prepared by Tetra Tech, Inc. and Closewaters, LLC Save Our Indian River Lagoon Project Plan 2018 Update, April 2018 Loss of Seagrass In partnership, the St. Johns River Water Management District, South Florida Water Management District, and Florida Department of Environmental Protection mapped seagrass from aerial imagery taken in 1943 and every two to three years since 1986 (Figure E-1). Through 2009, the areal footprint of seagrass generally expanded, with some areas nearing their targets, which are benchmarks used to evaluate the success of reducing loads of nutrients to the IRL system. Unfortunately, the areal extent of seagrass in the lagoon began to decline in 2011. In 2011, mapping documented a loss of almost 43% of the acreage present in 2009. Most of this loss occurred in the reaches adjacent to Brevard County, with extensive losses in Banana River Lagoon (24,000 to 3,000 acres or an 88% reduction) and the IRL down to Sebastian Inlet (50,000 to 20,000 acres or a 60% reduction). The losses occurred during a bloom of phytoplankton (single - celled algae) that reached unprecedented concentrations for a record duration as indicated by concentrations of chlorophyll -a (Figure E-2). Beyond the shallowest water, the bloom effectively reduced the amount of light reaching seagrasses below what they required for survival. Additional intense blooms exacerbated the situation. 90,000 N 07 60,000 c m 1K N N 0)30,000 M CD U) A Acres —Transect length C' 9)O9'& 41 CP O^ S:�5 & 6 & NN N3 Nb NA (:, NC, IOJ 0 0 0 1P 1 1 If If 1 If, If, 10 10 250 200 L m 150 U N N 100 N C: m d 50 Figure E-1: Mean Areal Extent of Seagrass and Mean Length of Transects 160 120 or m —ML —BRL —NIRL —NCIRL —Seb —SCIRL (O r W O O � N M� (n (O r` CO O Om 0) OQ) 0) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 OQ1 m m 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Figure E-2: Mean Chlorophyll -a Concentrations Prepared by Tetra Tech, Inc. and Closewaters, LLC 3M Save Our Indian River Lagoon Project Plan 2018 Update, April 2018 Since 2011, some seagrass acreage has returned. In the IRL along Brevard County, about 9,000 acres have returned or about 30% of the 30,000 acres that were lost. In addition, there has been a similar amount of recovery in Banana River Lagoon (6,000 acres returned out of 21,000 lost or about 30% recovery). Recovery has been hampered by further blooms that include a brown tide (Aureoumbra lagunensis) bloom in 2016, whose effects will be apparent in maps produced from digital photography acquired in 2017. The prognosis isnot good because the percentage cover of seagrass reached 5%, which is a record drop from 30-50% (Figure E-1). Unfortunately, the IRL appears to be following a pattern described for systems that receive increased loads of nutrients (Duarte 1995; Burkholder et al. 2007). The pattern involves a shift in the composition of the primary producer assemblage, with higher nutrient loads differentially promoting faster growing macroalgae and ultimately phytoplankton (Figure E-3). The macroalgae and phytoplankton can exacerbate loss of seagrasses, especially by shading them. Loss of seagrass and macroalgae makes more nutrients available to phytoplankton, and loss of seagrass means that the sediments can be resuspended, which also reduces light penetration. Overall, the change in the system becomes self-perpetuating. Reducing nutrient loads represents a critical first step in efforts to reverse the shift in primary producers. However, a return to the previous areal coverage of seagrass may take some time, especially if too few recruits are available and sediments are too destabilized for colonization. -+- Nutrients Limit -►-•-------- Light Limits -► Phytoplankton Seagrasses�.................................. Macroalgae ......... Epiphytes INCREASING NUTRIENTS —� Note: Adapted from Burkholder et al. 2007 Figure E-3: Conceptual Model Illustrating a Shift in Biomass Among Major Primary Producers with Increasing Nutrient Enrichment Nutrient Content of Seagrass Halodule wrightii stores nutrients in its aboveground and belowground biological material or biomass. The biomass of this and other seagrasses changes seasonally, with peak growth of aboveground shoots occurring in April and May and the greatest aboveground biomass recorded during summer. These seasonal changes introduce uncertainty into estimates of nutrient storage, but mean values will suffice for estimating return on investment in the long-term (Table E-1). For example, a single shoot of H. wrightii may contain up to five or more leaves in the summer, whereas in the winter this same shoot may contain only one leaf (Dunton 1996). For this estimate of nutrient content, we will assume that spring -summer growth and fall -winter senescence are Prepared by Tetra Tech, Inc. and Closewaters, LLC Save Our Indian River Lagoon Project Plan 2018 Update, April 2018 equal. Thus, we will focus on our recent estimates of an average amount of aboveground and belowground biomass or standing stock of H. wrightii (Table E-1 and Table E-2). Table E-1: Estimates of Biomass for Halodule Species Location Total Biomass (grams d weight/ml)Reference Total Biomass (grams dry weightIM2) Texas (Laguna Madre 10-400 Zieman and Zieman 1989 North Carolina (multiple locations) 22-208 Zieman and Zieman 1989 South Florida and Tampa Bay 10-300 Zieman and Zieman 1989 IRL (Fort Pierce Inlet) 124-198 Hefferman and Gibson 1983 IRL (Grand HarborNero) 45 Hefferman and Gibson 1983 IRL (Link Port) 20-140 Virnstein unpublished IRL (Brevard County) 53" Morris, Chamberlain, and Jacoby unpublished Texas (Laguna Madre) 10-400 Zieman and Zieman 1989 * Mean aboveground biomass = 23 grams dry weight m -z = [(mean percent cover X 30.533) X 0.019]; mean belowground biomass = 30 grams dry weight m -z = 1.3 x aboveground biomass Table E-2: Total Biomass in Seagrasses Along Brevard County Sublagoon Description Total Biomass (grams dry weightIM2) Mosquito Lagoon Brevard County line to southern end of subla oon 74 74 Banana River Lagoon NASA restricted area 64 Banana River Lagoon Remainder of Banana River Lagoon 44 53 IRL North of SR -405 51 2.02 IRL SR -405 to Pineda Causeway 35 44 IRL Pineda Causeway to Hog Point 28 0.24 IRL Hog Point to Brevard County line 51 39 Mean N/A 50 53 Duarte (1990) compared nutrient contents of 27 species of seagrass, including H. wrightii. He determined that nitrogen and phosphorus represent about 2.2% and 0.2% of the dry weight of aboveground and belowground tissue of H. wrightii, respectively. These values are similar to those calculated during a recent study in the IRL (Table E-3). The values can be combined with estimates of biomass to calculate how much nitrogen and phosphorus are sequestered by 100 acres of H. wrightii on average (Table E-4). Table E-3: Estimates of Nutrient Content for Halodule species BRL = Banana River Lagoon, IRL = Indian River Lagoon Prepared by Tetra Tech, Inc. and Closewaters, LLC 361) Nutrient content for Halodule wri htii (percentage of dry weight) Location Above round Below round Carbon Nitrogen Phosphorus Carbon Nitrogen I Phosphorus BRL-1 29.60 2.02 0.17 30.60 1.24 0.14 BRL-2 30.60 2.36 0.24 29.08 1.47 0.27 BRL-3 29.60 2.66 0.26 28.09 1.48 0.25 IRL-1 31.74 2.39 0.18 31.69 1.42 0.15 IRL-2 30.08 2.56 0.26 30.48 1.74 0.27 IRL-3 28.26 2.08 0.25 23.86 1.36 0.20 Mean 29.98 2.35 0.23 28.97 1.45 0.21 BRL = Banana River Lagoon, IRL = Indian River Lagoon Prepared by Tetra Tech, Inc. and Closewaters, LLC 361) Save Our Indian River Lagoon Project Plan 2018 Update, April 2018 Table E-4: Average Amount of Nutrients Contained in Seagrass from 1996-2009 Sub -Lagoon Acres Seagrass lbs/100 acres) Nitrogen (Ibs/100 acres Phosphorus Ibs/100 acres Southern Mosquito Lagoon 14,000 45,000 1,000 100 Banana River Lagoon 21,000 45,000 1,000 100 North IRL 19,000 37,000 900 90 Central IRL 7,000 36,000 900 90 Draft Evaluation Criteria for Planting Seagrass Part of the wisdom accumulated from past seagrass restoration projects is the importance of selecting sites that will support seagrass growth. Key information has been synthesized into an initial guide, with higher scores and more certainty indicating better sites for planting seagrass (Table E-5). Please note that the presence of seagrass leads to a lower score based on the premise that natural recruitment represents the most cost-effective option for restoring seagrass. In addition, a high level of uncertainty can suggest targets for further study. This guide can be refined following pilot studies to determine optimal methods for planting seagrass (e.g., type of planting units, use of chemicals to enhance growth, and density of initial planting) and protecting it from disturbance (e.g., grazing, waves, exposure, and low salinity) until it is established. References Burkholder, J.M., D.A. Tomasko, and B.W. Touchette. 2007. Seagrasses and eutrophication. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 350: 46-72. Duarte, C.M. 1990. Seagrass nutrient content. Marine Ecology Progress Series 6: 201-207. Duarte, C.M. 1995. Submerged aquatic vegetation in relation to different nutrient regimes. Ophelia 41: 87-112. Dunton, K.H. 1990. Production ecology of Ruppia maritima and Halodule wrightii Aschers in two subtropical estuaries. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 143: 147-164. Hefferman J.J., and R.A. Gibson. 1983. A comparison of primary production rates in Indian River, Florida seagrass systems. Florida Scientist 46: 295-306. Zieman, J.C., and R.T. Zieman. 1989. The ecology of seagrass meadows of the west coast of Florida: a community profile. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Biological Report 85(7.25), September 1989. Prepared by Tetra Tech, Inc. and Closewaters, LLC 32 �u cn c ° L m `o N E E y ym@g,cmc n�Ec E` 3 E n o�P.I ar m °&mag -P g gDa $� a_2i0 �'E $ EaoEc m`m om�V5 - mar Eq aai cm c cN ni�sg mcm�o @ y aR-6 m mm g g i E E E m a�.. m c S. v c m �F m 1.8 �c $ N 3'Em c mo 3° vn 2�c'Eo F cN 3f my55 yn��o5 Lm °c g9 1 - 0 cO1m m 6 a rLir J E K m J C A 2C c 2 V vmi `o m m C O g °--cm� m 3m - vE meN N `Z °m'E rn v L m cS c c m r Era `OG `c ° m m asp m m A ID N d m m1O o_ N... H o me 3v'E U a yG$ y- - cco E gt Hn$c c E cx w m N U Nm E �mE �y� vo n aO1$ vE �rn cEcn ° 12 c m 12o °N m or m m c m of >o >.D Eg mfg > t 2�mo m m y° E m in x i $ v mo u7E c vY n5n.$ cLEc o Eu o �mgm c cL €udeNr W 12 a oc�� -t00 E a mL•w o= a NINE o rymry- f.t Z' VV �2E�= 2L �V t CC �CLYOOiO 3 J =t a'O fOn N F O O o O > 0 u N °a 6 L° m C -yy o m m& n� :" vi 'a Na - o s A x$ m� °m B mmm x9 `ENtgc c9 ��'ag mmF x o8£� oa >. �� rnE _ _ L� E �co.12 o -o $ma Eg a$p. Ag$ uE $$ mnmm NON Uv o c$ nuc c`oq d-rna `foo$ c E E" E mom+ 'm' m o u oy _FcF N?m�. nE m$ DoE 8 mm m $ " n Y N C RE o Q'I V V W L Y y m ° _ 40 m p m Bi O S V m k A C C L .0 C o N vmr"v � d 9 N v> Nmo n11 C 9� L C 10 G>u p 0 �r >. .. O $mE c N g$ N o t5yac �S�oNm a c 3v v m Emm .. �c ww m�' mmm d%Cp -g and yr yr=cC E m gvD`m m�-m a m ° mm �ccac mro °o mr�°m =n3>. maC ma m@oE C fEm E$6 :Eo `nm m9m E2E :°cave __ �+ me - EE-_ m= -$�O E c?mo 8 `o _ i 0°1 gE J o J o'�o o c aEma E E., c€ Q 2HmE $ d f�'i°A .Em inEm iE o 'iov5 Na$n fu $E€ fsn f m�$ i m co - E ��ci 5 min ° v Em e.Ec° mY ana mcm cy or��cr, >. oxmCmsm$ Qn c�imc mvm `o o 5 = o� $ arca nc mvEi °E cE �_^@� `o rn° m L Q mm$ vEvEEa o 9�goro,2r 0 U Em2c o o V mC c Em'N°m° m n m>v Oac cTE.n �cm EQv ndtm c �' c v v in E H mea Emc o ° v c �mv�r°Av Rn m m:° °c ncv U$m _.-• m m�H m' �nmvt .- $$` 'o 'mA"o�'' vg=g'z m c�� ��2 ffi� aEp+ E v n n my L° ococmSE v E-mEc _� >T mty oc 75 c O8 �° a romom 8'nc2m c �Co 'mrid q $ `6 m t cVm o o EWi`m' nU uo_ rn= 5a8' �dn cv > 12 E$°i m aR. ym .. .. mmm. E m m�4 ° v me m$H�$v im xm•c ��m =gym SEEomE W myn° L S ?�m�1 >ISz�gvrh L U $ m �g >o > m m m a m J J �1 m O - mo o nm sli c dg v"o u $L�Em Uv, b v� Sv $ ag 'c umi `coh H�'o m H$ du :. o ° ` c`o m5m yt nq o�L° ooc v moo ^ imc °$V m= 'L �m'm `vuEo o u�E D c -l. o cm.. Eto � o �m=� mL`o ma $ m$ cmc m€s a°�5m mFFm g=°O 9m€3` m ESE >� 16 a 5 - n m"e C1w W:� i$ N`°. mD t0 �mQ G 20 my o N N U Q C Z n O J m V E 6 HH � E ° � �� � � � c' � E � 0 5 � v t c � � S E � E o �, 5 2 _ O '' •� o. gill, y �a-t 5s8c-- Aga a 5`oS ell Is 11 y C MOM OWE s � w° - - - - -i•Yix � ` ° E t t t t a i r a a i•aaz �a r i• � - � � t _ C t t t C t t .Q aaaa as a ac ac a s a a a a a o " m E G E € 5 = 2 - z a U r r a a a U � i• r r � t � t t t t g t t tgo ���ogs r= F a s a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a c 72_ 9 J .g DISTRICT INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA 5; MEMORANDUM TO: Honorable Emergency Services District Board of Commissioners THROUGH: Jason E. Brown, County Administrator THROUGH: Tad Stone, Director Department of Emergency Services FROM: Erin Baskins, Staff Assistant IV Department of Emergency Services DATE: June 5, 2018 SUBJECT: Approval of Property Lease Extension for Temporary Location of Fire Rescue Station No. 7 (1893 901h Avenue) It is respectfully requested that the information contained herein be given formal consideration by the Emergency Services District Board of Commissioners. DESCRIPTION: On June 23, 2015, Joseph G. Miller and Indian River County entered into a lease agreement for the use of the property located at 1893 90th Avenue, Vero Beach, Florida to serve as a short term location for a modular Fire Station No. 7. On May 2, 2017, Lessor and Lessee entered into an Amendment to Lease Agreement, reflecting St. Lucie Battery and Tire Company as the Lessor on the Lease Agreement; and the Lease Agreement allows the Lessee to renew the Lease Agreement, at its sole discretion, for 3 additional one (1) year terms. The Board approved the first year extension on June 20, 2017. Staff is requesting to renew the Lease Agreement for the second one (1) year term, and shall expire on June 23, 2019. FUNDING: Funding for the property lease for Fire Rescue Station No. 7 are available and budgeted in the Emergency Services District's Rent -Land account. The total cost of the property lease will remain at $12,000.00 a year. ITEM Amount Account Number Fire Rescue Station No. 7 Prope Lease 1 $12,000.00 1 11412022-034410 RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the second one (1) year lease extension. ATTACHMENTS: Two Original Copies of the Lease Extension Agreement 366 RENEWAL OF LEASE AGREEMENT THIS RENEWAL OF LEASE AGREEMENT ("Renewal") is entered into as of the 19"' day of June; 2018 by and between St. Lucie Battery and Tire Company, a Florida corporation, ("Lessor") and Indian River County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida (the "Lessee"): RECITALS WHEREAS, on June 23, 2015, Joseph G. Miller and Lessee entered into a lease agreement (the "Lease Agreement") for the use of the property located at 1893 906' Avenue, Vero Beach, Florida (the "Leased Premises") to serve as a short term location for a modular Fire Station #7; and WHEREAS, on November 2, 2016, Joseph G_ Miller, individually, and as Trustee of the Joseph G. Miller Revocable Living Trust, dated October 2, 1986, deeded the Leased Premises to Lessor; and WHEREAS, on May 2, 2017, Lessor and Lessee entered into an Amendment to Lease Agreement, reflecting St. Lucie Battery and Tire Company as the Lessor on the Lease Agreement; and WHEREAS, the Lease Agreement allows the Lessee to renew the Lease Agreement, at its sole discretion, for 3 additional one (1) year terms; and WHEREAS, on June 20, 2017, the Lessee and the Lessee renewed the Lease Agreement for the first one (1) year term; and WHEREAS, it is the intent of the Lessor and the Lessee that the Lease Agreement be renewed for the second one (1) year term; NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual undertakings herein and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and adequacy of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties agree, as follows: 1. Recitals. The above recitals are true and correct and are incorporated herein. 2. Renewal. The Lease Agreement, as amended by the Amendment to Lease Agreement, shall be renewed for the second one (1) year term, and shall expire on June 23, 2019. 3. All other provisions of the Lease Agreement, as amended by the Amendment to Lease Agreement, shall remain in full force and effect. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Lessor and Lessee have executed this instrument this 19" day of June, 2018. Page I of 2 367 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA By: Peter D. O'Bryan, Chairman Board of County Commissioners Date Approved: ATTEST.:- Jeffrey R. Smith Clerk of the Court and Comptroller By: Deputy Clerk St. Lucie Battery and Tire Company By: G. Douglas Miller Witnessed ---� Title: President signature: Printed name:�— signature: �w Printed name:�f {t(r'j, APPROVED AS TO FORM: Dylan Reingold, Esq. County Attorney APPROVED County Administrator Page 2 of 2 368