The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1995-145RESOLUTION NO. 95- 145 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, APPROVING THE TRANSMITTAL OF A PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO THE INDIAN RIVER COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TO THE STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS FOR THEIR REVIEW. WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners adopted the Indian River County Comprehensive Plan on February 13, 1990, and WHEREAS, the county received comprehensive plan amendment applications during its July, 1995 amendment submittal window, and WHEREAS, the Local Planning Agency held a public hearing on this comprehensive plan amendment request on October 26, 1995 after due public notice, and WHEREAS, the Local Planning Agency made a recommendation to the Board of County Commissioners regarding the transmittal of the comprehensive plan amendment listed below to the State of Florida Department of Community Affairs; and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County held a Transmittal Public Hearing on November 21, 1995, after advertising pursuant to F.S. 163.3184(15)(b)(1), and WHEREAS, The Board of County Commissioners announced at the transmittal public hearing its intention to hold and advertise a final public hearing at the adoption stage of the plan amendment. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA THAT: 1. The above recitals are ratified in their entirety. 2. The following proposed amendment is approved for transmittal to the State of Florida Department of Community Affairs for written comment: Request to amend the Capital Improvements Element and the Traffic Circulation Element of the Comprehensive Plan. RESOLUTION NO. 95- 145 The forgoing Resolution was offered by Commissioner Tiepin and seconded by Commissioner Eggert and upon being put to a vote the vote was as follows: Chairman Kenneth R. Macht Aye Vice -Chairman Fran B. Adams Aye Commissioner Richard N. Bird _Ate Commissioner Carolyn K. Eggert _Ave Commissioner John W. Tippin Aye The Chairman thereupon declared the resolution duly passed and adopted at a public hearing held this 21st day of November 1995. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS INDIAN RIVER C UNT FLORIDA BY: � enneth Al' acht,'Chairm n r y,J a �l J Barton, Clerk `�l� b.C. �Admin. Rroer Ln Ap{;ro�•�d CIL) 11 u\v\:j\cpres795.ta C PROPOSED REVISIONS TO THE CONPREHENSIVE FLIM 1. Traffic Circulation Element Policy 1.5 and Objective 2 2. Traffic Circulation Element Table 4.7.4 3. Traffic Circulation Element Figure 4.5.2 4. Traffic Circulation Element. Figure 4.13.2 5. Capital Improvements Element Policy 5.13 6. Capital Improvements Element Data and Analysis page 50 7. Capital Improvements Element Availability of Capacity Section 8. Capital Improvements Element Table 13.8 9. Capital Improvements Element Table 13.18 10. Capital Improvements Element Table 13.23 11. Capital Improvements Element Table 13.24 TRAFFIC CIRCULATION ELEMENT POLICY 1.5: The county hereby adopts the 2010 Major Roadway Improvements schedule incorporated in this clement (Ref.: Table 4.7.4). The improvements shown in the 2010 Major Roadway Improvements table are those that are included in the 1996-2010 years of the Indian River County MPO's adopted 2020 Long Range Transportation Plan. Where conflicts arise between the 2010 Major Roadway Improvements table and other tables in this element, the 2010 Major Roadwav Improvements table will prevail. OBJECTIVE 2 ADEQUATE TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM The county traffic circulation system will operate at or above the minimum service levels specified in Policy 1.1, and traffic system improvements (identified in Tables 4.7.1, 4.7.2, 4.7.3, and 4.7.4) needed to ensure operation of roadways at or above the adopted level of service standard will be provided. PROPOSED Table 4.7.4 1010 Major Roadway Improvements i.11ty From To Project Length (ML) Exist Rdwy Type* Improvement Type Estimated Cost 1 4th St St. Lucie County 4.3 4LD Add 2 Las $6,957,940 60 66th Ave 82nd Ave 2.0 4LD Add 2 Tats $2,942,600 60 82nd Ave I-95 2.0 4LD Add 2 Lns S2,942,600 512/Fellsmene Rd C.R. 510 Roseland Rd 1.4 2LU Add 2 Lns 52,554,400 512/Fellsmene Rd I-95 C.R. 510/Webasso Rd 2.6 2LU Add 2 Lns 53,750,000 cis Highway St. Lucie Co Line C.R. 510 9 — New 2Lns $10,398,400 Rd/9th St S.W. Old Dixie Hwy 27th Ave 2.0 2LU Add 2 Lns 53,500,200 Rd/9th St S.W. 27th Ave 82nd Ave 5.1 2LU Add 2 Las S8,387,580 t Ave 12th St St. Lucie County 3.4 2LU Add 2 Las 55,452,070 1St U.S.1 58th Ave 2 — New 4Lns $1,994,100 t Ave S.R. 60 Oslo Rd/9th SL S.W. 3.15 — New 2 Las 51,249,480 1 Ave/Schumann Dr U.S. 1 Barber St/Stratton 1.9 2LU Add 2 Las 52,961,020 hoer St/Stratton Ave C.R. 512 U.S. 1 3.7 2LU Add 2 Lns 51,000,000 510/Wabasso Rd C.R. 512 66th Ave 4.2 2LU Add 2 Las $5,000,000 510/Wabasso Rd 66th Ave U.S. 1 1.6 2LU Add 2 Las 52,494,520 i Ave/Schumann Dr C.R. 510 S.R. 60 7.6 2LU Add 2 Los 512,627,080 I St 43rd Ave 58th Ave/Kmgs Hwy 1.0 2LU Add 2 Lns 52,094,800 h St 58th Ave 66th Ave 1.0 — New 4 Las 52,211,200 ealand Rd U.S. 1 C.R. 512 3.7 2LU Add 2 Las 55,720,420 2 Lane Undivided Roadway - 4 Lane Divided Roadway ii -w projects are consistent with the 1996-2010 interim year sets of the Indian River County MPO's adopted Y„0 Long Range Transportation Plan. tic Ci:calatlan alamaet (/118/9! 11, WM ALA er v e v n � a � 9 o n D D Y N -i q D D m m Z Y 1 N l7 •.in .r.l w i i i N > a C D No ew •r• T ; Z C,10 roan 0 3 D Y •aural O• ?' m r .iu •n a ^ n A H X .j d'' O n nu•n 1 ? Z ..... e ; K v 5 If Y o p F _ � N I✓Y m n a � 1 o Ir, Z n XS M y 2 T a :j 22 d tynrZ< fpr :u :u ep fl) Q i] h N r � A •$•0 a -c PROPOSED Table 4.7.4 2010 Major Roadway Improvements Fictlity From To Project Length (ML) Exist Rdwy Type* Improvement Type Estim®ted Cost U.S. 1 4th St St. Lucie County 4.3 4LD Add 2 Las $6,957,940 S.R. 60 66th Ave 82nd Ave 2.0 4LD Add 2 Las 52,942,600 S.R. 60 82nd Ave 1-95 2.0 4LD Add 2 Las $2,942,600 C.R. 512/Fellsmere Rd C.R. 510 Roseland Rd 1.4 2LU Add 2 Las 52,554,400 C.R. 512/Fellsmem Rd I.95 C.R. 510/Wabasso Rd 2.6 2LU Add 2 Im S3,750,000 Citrus Highway St. Lucie Co Line C.R. 510 9 — New 2Lns S10,398,400 Oslo Rd/9th St S.W. Old Dixie Hwy 27th Ave 2.0 2LU Add 2 Lns 53,500,200 Oslo Rd/9th St S.W. 27th Ave 82nd Ave 5.1 2LU Add 2 Las 58,387,580 27th Ave 12th St St. Lucie County 3.4 2LU Add 2 Las $5,452,070 53rd St U.S.1 58th Ave 2 — New 4Lns S1,994,100 66th Ave S.R. 60 Oslo Rd/9th St. S.W. 3.15 — New 2 Las 51,249,480 66th Ave/Schumann Dr U.S. 1 Barber St/Stratton 1.9 2LU Add 2 Lns $2,961,020 Barber SUStratton Ave C.R. 5I2 U.S. 1 3.7 2LU Add 2 Las $1,000,000 C.R. 510/Wabasso Rd C.R. 512 66th Ave 4.2 2LU Add 2 Las $5,000,000 C.R. 510/Wabasso Rd 66th Ave U.S. 1 1.6 2LU Add 2 Lns 52,494,520 66th Ave/Schumaml Dr C.R. 510 S.R. 60 7.6 2LU Add 2 Im 512,627,080 26th St 43rd Ave 58th Ave/Kings Hwy 1.0 2LU Add 2 Lns $2,094,800 26th St 58th Ave 66th Ave 1.0 — New 4 Las 52,211,200 Roseland Rd U.S. 1 C.R. 512 3.7 1 2LU Add 2 Las $5,720,420 *Key: 2LU - 2 Lane Undivided Roadway 4LD - 4 Lane Divided Roadway These projects are consistent with the 1996-2010 interim year sets of the Indian River County MPO's adopted 2020 Long Range Transportation Plan. Traffic CIMLIMticm 110100t 1G/lugs M"PO I . LS 110 O c to co C, OWN poll #A�fin MON, �M K a a p O 7 > C O me Aire eeM AGG 7A/b AOG Gelb AGG �e Gibe AGGl le/e Glib eGr Gib wIC 0' a� .s. Y-.— b b 40 n 0 r (OF C7 a^ a m x z Z .n -n Q o _ " _ m e ymj =!-4 m a T71 p N D � M EI lot (OF C7 a^ a m x z Z .n -n Q o _ " _ m e ymj =!-4 m a T71 p N D � M HE 40 9 ro n s w ®� oes a— o.^ i CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT POLICY 5.13: The county hereby adopts the Priority Transportation Capital improvements Schedule (reference: Table 13.24). Table 13.24 provides the project description,_ estimated date of commencement of actual construction, estimated date of completionL and estimated cost for protects that will increase roadway capacity on priority facilities The Priority Transportation Cdpital Improvements Schedule is consistent with the Schedule of Improvements (Table 13.23) and the first three years of the adopted Florida Department of Transportation Five -Year Work Program. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT Fiscal Assessment Summary This section provides -an analysis of the county's revenues and expenditures for its capital improvement needs for the seven year period beginning in fiscal year (F%) 1993-94 and ending in FY 1999- 2000. The estimated costs of the county's capital improvement needs for this seven year projection period are derived from each applicable comprehensive plan element's capital improvement schedule or program and other identified facility needs. The estimated costs of these capital improvements are summarized by individual element and year in Table 13.18. Also, Table 13.23 summarizes each individual element's capital improvement needs, along with their cost, timeframe, and revenue source(s). Table 13.24 provides further data specific to priority transportation improvements. The estimated revenues to be used to pay for the projected capital improvements needs consist of existing revenue sources and proposed revenue sources. For purposes of this analysis, proposed revenues are assumed to have been approved and implemented as required in order to balance anticipated revenues and expenditures. Table 13.18 provides a summary of the projected revenues and expenditures by element category for capital improvements needs for fiscal years 1993-94 through 1999-2000. This table identifies each revenue by source and amount of revenue for each year by element. The table also identifies the amount of estimated expenditure costs and revenue for each element by year. The resulting balance of each element's costs versus its revenues is also provided in Table 13.18. The projected revenue from the adopted One -Cent Local Option Sales Tax identified in Table 13.18 is carried over from year to years The tax became effective June 1, 1989. The county anticipated revenue from the tax is approximately $5.3 million per year for a maximum of 15 years. It is projected that the tax will have a 5% to 6% growth factor per year beginning in fiscal year 1989-90. For the Traffic Circulation element, estimated revenues consist of gas taxes, traffic impact fees and a portion of the adopted One Cent Local option Sales Tax. As indicated in Table 13.18, the revenues are expected to fund the anticipated costs of the Identified traffic circulation capital improvement needs for the seven year period. The estimated revenue from gas taxes is not exclusively for capital improvement financing. These revenues are also used to fund other transportation related expenditures such as operating costs. The Drainage element's revenue sources consist of the use of funds from the road and bridge, transportation improvement and park improvement funds. Also, revenues are proposed from the adoption CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT Availability of Capacity Facility capacity can -be assessed two different ways. First, facility capacity can be determined by facilities that are existing and available; examples would be existing treatment plants and existing roadways with a set number of lanes. The second manner for assessing facility capacity is to consider both existing, in - the -ground facilities as well as facility expansions or new facilities which are programmed but not yet existing. For purposes of assessing facility capacity, the capacity of existing, in -the -ground facilities will be considered in all cases. Programmed facilities will be considered in assessing capacity for each public facility category when the following conditions are met: o For sanitary sewer, potable water, solid waste and drainage facilities: a development order or permit is issued subject to the condition that, at the time of the issuance of a certificate of occupancy, the necessary_ facilities and services are in place and available -----facility-expansion-is-a-condition-of-a-development order"; or - facility is currently under construction; or - facility is guaranteed by an enforceable development agreement. o For recreation facilities: facility expansion is the subject of a binding executed contract providing for commencement of construction or property acquisition within one year of development -order issuance of a certificate of occupancy; or - facility expansion or property acquisition is guaranteed in an enforceable development agreement providing for facility expansion/property acquisition within one year of development-ersY3er issuance of a certificate of occupancy. A For transportation facilities: -----facility--expansion--meets--any--of--the--criteria referenced -above; -or -----facility-expansion-cmtgt--be-+ncitrded-Air-the- coantp1a Five-Fear-Schedule-cf-eapitai-improvements;-and e ---- the -faefl-itp-must-be-y.Kte3Kxdetfwlt d-n7the-urban service -area; s ---- the- facility- vrdst -have--an -estimated--date-for eonstrnetion-to-begin-and-be-completed; e----the--facility--must--be--scheduled--to--start construction- by- t-he-�tri-ref-teer-af -the-5-Year Schedule-cf-eapital-improvements;-and e - - - -a-delay- irr t��i-on- -crf- the• -f aef�ftp -F►i 11 require -a -comprehensive -plan -amendment; e - - - - the -capital -improvements- -e-kement- end- the- Five - Year-Schedule-of-eapital-improvements-must-be CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT Availability of Capacity Facility capacity can -be assessed two different ways. First, facility capacity can be determined by facilities that are existing and available; examples would be existing treatment plants and existing roadways with a set number of lanes. The second manner for assessing facility capacity is to consider both existing, in - the -ground facilities as well as facility expansions or new facilities which are programmed but not yet existing. For purposes of assessing facility capacity, the capacity of existing, in -the -ground facilities will be considered in all cases. Programmed facilities will be considered in assessing capacity for each public facility category when the following conditions are met: o For sanitary sewer, potable water, solid waste and drainage facilities: - a development order or permit is issued subject to the condition that, at the time of the issuance of a certificate of occupancy, the necessary facilities and services are in place and available -----facility-expansion-is-a-condition-of-a-development order°; or - facility is currently under construction; or - facility is guaranteed by an enforceable development agreement. o For recreation facilities: facility expansion is the subject of a binding executed contract providing for commencement of construction or property acquisition within one year of development -order issuance of a certificate of occupancy; or facility expansion or property acquisition is guaranteed in an enforceable development agreement providing for facility expansion/property acquisition within one year of development --order issuance of a certificate of occupancy. o For transportation facilities: -----faei}ftp--expansion--meets--any--of--the--criteria referenced -above; -or - -- - - f ac i } i tp-expansion -must-be--i-nc i-uded- Air- the -c onntyl a Fine-year-Schedule-of-eapita}-improvements;-and e----the-facility-must-b% -i-nciJttded-witt! rthe-urban service -area; ® ---- the-facillty-must -have -errr-estimated-date -for construction -to -begin -and -be -completed; e----the--facility--must--be--scheduled--to--start construction- by- t+te--third -yew-of-the-5-Fear Schedule-cf-eapital-improvements;-and a - - - -a- delay--i-rr -c:onstruetri�rr -off--the -facif itp -r+i } } require -e -comprehensive -plan -amendment; e - - - - the -capital -improvements- -e-lement- imd- the -Five - Fear-Schedule-cf-eapitai-Improvements-mast-be financially -feasible; e ---- the-Five-Year-Schedtrl% -&f-eapi.ta-l-Improvements must -- itrai-ntrai-n- - -adapted - - -level- - -orf- - -service standards; - -must - -serve- - -new- - development --end e3lirrurate-----errksting ---- def-i-c--encfes----es prierftized; e----a--realistic;--financially--feasible--funding system--based--on-cu'rx`ent31---avaA-1-b1e' -revenue sources -mast -be -used; e---- development- - regtrletiorrs --that---ensure---the issuanee--o-f--development--orders-end- -permits only- -whelt--fsci- Jt+es--and--ser%-kees--wi-1-1--be ava f i abi e- to--e�odnte--deve+opment- -mUat -be adopted; e----a--momktczrkng- system- -capable - of--determfofng whether -the- xtoptedl liverof- service- standards are---met----end --- the- --sehedurle--- f ---capital improvements -is -followed -must -be -adapted; -and a---- areas --*_`•_e pub,11c--faeklktkeg--erns-services wit} --be -provided-wit-h--pubkic--funds--Trust--be designated- - a development order or permit is issued subject to the conditions that the necessary transportation facilities needed to serve the new development are included in Table 13 24, the county's adopted five- year schedule of priority transportation capital improvements, and are scheduled to be in place or under actual construction not more than two years after issuance of a certificate of occupancy for the development By reference, the schedule_ of capital im2rrovements recognizes and includes transportation projects included in the first three years of the applicable, adopted Florida Department of Transportation five year work program. Table 13.24 also includes the estimated date for the commencement of actual construction and the estimated date of completion for each of the transportation capital improvements. where a_ development order or permit is issued pursuant to the provisions of this section, a comprehensive plan amendment will be required to eliminate, defer, or delay construction of any transportation facility improvement which is listed in the five- year schedule of capital improvements, and which is needed to maintain the adopted level of service standard; or at the time a development order or permit is issued, the necessary transportation facilities are the subject of a binding executed agreement which requires the necessary transportation facilities to serve the new development to be in place not more than two years after the issuance of a certificate of occupancy for the development; or at the time a development order or permit is issued, the necessary transportation facilities are guaranteed in an enforceable development agreement, Pursuant to Section 163.3220, F.S., or an agreement or development order issued pursuant to Chapter 380, F.S., to be in place or under actual construction not more than two years after issuance of a certificate of occupancy for the development. * only applicable for consideration for the project to which the development order does or will apply. 40 O 0 o o m o m o 0 0 C; 0 0 0 0 0 0 o o m 0 mo m 0 m o m.n O m T umi ,o p 00 N p m p O m m p O O O O O O O O O O m O m U m m 00 m Od b N m m N 0 m 0 N +I O b O p O � O O • O � o P n 0 o O 00 o o O O m o m e m 0 r N 0 0 0 O Y o 0 O 0 o 'goo m 0 n o T N 0 0 O 0 o 0 m 0! m 0 N d O 0 0 O tl 0 0 C m o o O N m o m o m o m r N n N N p� m O O O O O Om m 0 0 O 0 0 v m O O O o O O O a O O O O O O O m O m p0 0 0 m 0 m n m m 00 0 o 0 o 0 0 m 0 0 o w 0 0 a 0 0 o •i o a 0 a m m 0 0 o o 0 0 0 m O 0 0 o o N o 0 1. O o 0 O e m 0 0 v N 0 0 v0i a 0 0 m N U N ti N m 0 t® •ilu U Iu N >D 1p� � ✓ � � yM� m e yy • �+ �j vin Ntie.n mv�i• vnio .aa n1N •+o W mmmamo0 mmonmm0 or n [Oi d •i O N O d d N N m N N V V 1O b d M N m� n M 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 b b 7 N �D 0 m h N O m m 0 00 0 0 0 0 N O O O of N •� •a O N N O O w N O m m m m O N N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O N N d V 0 Q T 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 V O Y d 0 •y O O m 0 0 m 0 0 O O O N.� �M NNOrvN nbNO IzI �m+o odo o.�+m0 n oN o O ori o 0 m .i000•. a •a oe a mvio ri mm w m w m t•f a .... N m ry m O I •� O N O d 0 0 .... 0 0 0 b N O d N b O N m 0 N 0 .o 0 0 0 0 o n N. o 0 m °� O P m vt NON N ut M N O O O �•1 m r uVi m Y f 0 N a O m N N 0 N m m N N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 •• • • Ut M O O N ut r•1 m m ••1 V N O N V V .a+oo o 1 Mo N O O •y O N N 0 0 0 0 m m O N m m N O N N N ry tl ®P] C m o o N mNtl vHp�� R N N u F W I m Q n pp qqq M p pppHppp W�p Wmp oq Hpp � mWm COO � C HO1�S m m •G � N � W 0 PI ✓� 0 00 q �� C C 40 q 0 e m O N o m m Egg, e ry N a h n r' �I:I ml m p O N O m o O O N 22 mlp O O O m m m 0 0 0 0 q q .qi O O 00 O O O o 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9999 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O 0 0 0 m m 0 0 0 0 0 0 q p 0 0 O 00 0 .0 nl m N 0 b 0 0 0 m p N N O h N N 0 H O O O H .+ O O O O O 0 0 0 0 � 0 0 0 m H O W N •, O m �j p W hlnl hl v m o o 0 0 o v o P Qt ...000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 M M o 0 0 0 0 N VI y. f. � 0 O m 0 0 000000 .... 0 O O o. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O p 0 0 m O O V T OO W O m O V m V O H 0 0 0 m m .v W mlol ml 0 0 oo o Oo o o O m o � d000 v. .q-�o oo omvo 000 �' a om000 n Py 0 0 00O0 O O OOOm00 OO0 o 000000 o O O 0O m ' OPi N N O O N N m m O O O O O m V P q M p 0 0 O 00 0 0 0 O O O O 0 0 0 0 O O O O O 0 0 0 0 W. m n �f01 N O N V O m m 6 n P 0 , 0 0 H N N FI U ; u 10 0 s a. V Y stli M n® u 4 HH N So ®�� Oyy N ■�U� y O W $ u H H N .Oi H 9 NGG U � 0 O O ti H Vpp m { m� C ti Vm m O .~i ski O m y O 9 y tl p y p u H 2 lo r / ! ■ � � � 7 % ` � � 00 }\ \ \ En'\ }} \41 g 0§ E 0 K E% , # \ ` K } | & .2 » 9$ ^ /2) § 7_ , _ . — Ol o/ rrr. Q { . & » ■ |§ / & | ` 7 \ 2 # '} ( § $\ { \ & E } § ( 7 w \ E \ K \ \ E \ B / ; \ 06k ■ �� ! E rr P o d o [y c n w S u I N N a g o p � CCcO (pgD pp 'J' O pa p y r� N � ❑ 6 W � m f(�0]° pm pOp s ° r m n w m n N s e ."'i • ~ • ° '11p11 �p 1p�� h s pO • ( o Sl gp 'O g b p PV [ Vi t m ts IL CL WOpp Omq o B 7 mt �„ y pH 44 v m 0 m m p ®g p m 6 N O 0 O Y NO O W N K m W m A O 01 O K P b U o O p O O O � O U b P O O T m O O � �p N m O O 10 O � b m o 0 m �o m �o e 0 qq o 4 4 4 4 V 77— H H N O O N n tl yyy myyy 4 4 4 N 4 4 4 4 O -.To] tie f� Table 13.24 Priority Transportation Capital Improvements Program Fadlity From To Improvement Type Estimated Begin Date Estimated Completion Date Estimated Cost 43rd Avenue 26th Street 12th Street Widen to 4 lanes Feb 1997 Dec 1997 51,0001000 C.R. 512/Fellsmere Rd I-95 CR 510 Widen to 4 lanes Sep 1997 Dec 1998 $3,750,000 12th Street 12th Avenue 27th Avenue Widen to 4 lanes Sep 1998 Sep 1999 51,250,000 58th Avenue 33rd Street 23rd Street Widen to 4 lanes Sep 1996 Sep 1998 $650,000 58th Avenue SR 60 17th Street Widen to 4 lanes Sep 1996 Sep 1998 5650,000 58th Avenue 17th Street 4th Street Widen to 4 lanes Oct 1997 Oct 1999 $1,950,000 16th/17th Street US 1 W of 14th Ave Widen to 5 lanes Sep 1999 Sep 2001 51,500,000 Old Dixie Hwy Oslo Road 4th Street Widen to 3 lanes Sep 1999 Sep 2001 $2,625,000 Old Dixie Hwy 4th Street 12th Street Widen to 3 lanes Sep 1998 Oct 1999 $1,250,000 Old Dixie Hwy 12th Street 16th Street Widen to 3 lanes Sep 1997 Oct 1998 S750,000 27th Avenue Oslo Road 4th Street Widen to 3 lanes Sep 1999 Sep 2000 S2,000,000 4th Street 20th Avenue Old Dixie Hwy Widen to 3 Imes Sep 1999 Sep 2000 1 $1,000,000 Capital Ieprovaraato slewwt 11/14/95 CIYRVM.XLB