Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout03/26/2019 (2)BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS INDIAN RIVER COUNTY FLORIDA COMMISSION AGENDA TUESDAY, MARCH 26, 2019 - 9:00 AM Commission Chambers Indian River County Administration Complex 1801 27th Street, Building A Vero Beach, Florida, 32960-3388 www.ircgov.com COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Bob Solari, Chairman, District 5 Susan Adams, Vice Chairman, District 1 Joseph E. Flescher, District 2 Peter D. O'Bryan, District 4 Tim Zorc, District 3 Jason E. Brown, County Administrator Dylan Reingold, County Attorney Jeffrey R. Smith, Clerk of the Circuit Court and Comptroller 1. CALL TO ORDER 2.A. A MOMENT OF SILENT REFLECTION FOR FIRST RESPONDERS 2.B. INVOCATION Jeffrey R. Smith, Clerk of the Circuit Court and Comptroller 3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Commissioner Tim Zorc 4. ADDITIONS/DELETIONS TO THE AGENDA / EMERGENCY ITEMS 5. PROCLAMATIONS and PRESENTATIONS 5.A. Presentation of Proclamation Designating the Day of April 9, 2019, as . Equal Pay Day Attachments: Proclamation 5.B. Presentation of Indian River County's first-ever Senior Expo, presented by Linda Barker, Director for Development for American Association of University Women, Vero Beach Branch (AAUW Vero Beach) Attachments: Poster AAUW Sponsor Page AAUW March 26, 2019 Page 1 of 8 S.C. Presentation of Proclamation Designating March 30, 2019 as Indian River Steam Fest Day Attachments: Proclamation 6. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 6.A. Regular Meeting of January 22, 2019 6.B. Regular Meeting of February 5, 2019 6.C. Regular Meeting of February 12, 2019 6.D. Regular Meeting of February 19, 2019 7. INFORMATION ITEMS FROM STAFF OR COMMISSIONERS NOT REQUIRING BOARD ACTION 7.A. Non -Binding Memorandum of Understanding for Research, Education and Training, Florida Atlantic University Board of Trustees Attachments: Staff Report Executive Summary Non -Binding Memorandum of Understanding 7.B. Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) Citizen Advisory Committee Vacancy Announcement Attachments: Staff Report 7.C. Proclamation Honoring Suzanne C. Masters on Her Retirement From Indian River County Board of County Commissioners Department of General Services Library Services Division with Seventeen Years of Service Attachments: Proclamation 7.D. Proclamation Honoring Joseph Stephens on His Retirement From Indian River County Board of County Commissioners Department of Public Works Traffic Engineering Division with Twenty -Four Years of Service Attachments: Proclamation 7.E. Proclamation Honoring Michael Feathers on His Retirement From Indian River County Board of County Commissioners Department of Public Works Facilities Management Division with Thirty -Five Years of Service Attachments: Proclamation 7.F. City of Fellsmere Ordinance 2019-03, Notice of Annexation of 12.655 Acres More or Less Attachments: City of Fellsmere Ordinance 2019-03 8. CONSENT AGENDA March 26, 2019 Page 2 of 8 8.A. Checks and Electronic Payments March 1, 2019 to March 7, 2019 Attachments: Finance Department Staff Report 8.B. Checks and Electronic Payments March 8, 2019 to March 14, 2019 Attachments: Finance Department Staff Report 8.C. Disposition of Former Fire Station 7 Attachments: Staff Report 8.D. Third Amendment to Lease Agreement with Gifford Youth Achievement Center, Inc. Attachments: Staff Report Third Amendment to Lease GYAC Resolution 8.E. Award of Bid 2019042 - Jones' Pier Fruit Stand Replica Attachments: Staff Report Sample Agreement - Bid 2019042 8.F. Release of Demolition Lien Attachments: Staff Report Lien 8.G. Ray Sheltra's Request for Affidavit of Exemption Approval with County Acceptance of Limited Access Easements Attachments: Staff Report Application Location Map Affidavit of Exemption Layout 8.H. Request for the Board of County Commissioners to Approve and to Authorize the Board Chairman to Sign the Impact Fee Update Consultant Services Contract Attachments: Staff Report Impact Fee Consultant Contract 8.I. 37th Street and Indian River Boulevard - Acquisition of Right -of -Way 3725 Indian River Boulevard, Vero Beach, FL 32960 Owner: EGV 1, LLC Attachments: Staff Report Purchase Agreement March 26, 2019 Page 3 of 8 8.J. Proposal for NexusWorx - Fiber Documentation System - Project Phase -2 Attachments: Staff Report Byers Phase 2 Proposal Gerelcom Phase 2 Quote Fiber Survey Phases Map 8.K. Work Order No. 1 for Southeastern Surveying 45th Street Improvements Water and Sewer Utility Relocations Attachments: Staff Report Work Order No 1 Southeastern Surveying and Mapping Corporation Proposal 8.L. Work Order No. 1 with Arcadis for Design, Procurement and Construction Administration to Rehabilitate the RAS/WAS Pumps at the Central Wastewater Treatment Plant Attachments: Staff Report Work Order No 1 RAS and WAS pump replacement 8.M. Paymentus Merchant Services Banking Documents Attachments: Staff Report Paymentus Master Services Agreement Chase - Additional Company Application Paymentus - ACH Origination Addendum Chase - Government Owned Addendum Chase - Payment Processing Instructions and Guidelines 8.N. Children's Services Advisory Committee's Recommendation of Focus Areas of Need, Request for Proposal, and Agency Grant Contract for FY 2019-20 Attachments: Staff Report Request For Proposal Focus Areas of Need RFP Press Release Sample Contract - Agency Grant Contract 8.0. Miscellaneous Budget Amendment 008 Attachments: Staff Report 2018 2019 Resolution Exhibit "A" March 26, 2019 Page 4 of 8 8.P. Budget Amendment 009 Intergovernmental Coordinator/Public Information Officer Position Attachments: Staff Report 2018 2019 Resolution Exhibit "A" 8.Q. Indian River County Community Needs Assessment Funding Commitment for FY2019/2020 Attachments: Staff Report Indian River Community Foundation Letter 03-20-19 9. CONSTITUTIONAL OFFICERS and GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES 9.A. Indian River County Supervisor of Elections Leslie Rossway Swan: Request to have the Revenue from the February 26, 2019 City of Vero Beach Special Election be Rolled into the Supervisor of Elections 2018/2019 Budget; and Request for Permission to Relocate Two Polling Places Attachments: Supervisor of Elections Correspondence Dated March 19, 2019 9.B. Indian River County Supervisor of Elections Leslie Rossway Swan: Request Authorization for the County's 15% Match, Budgeted in the Supervisor of Elections FY 2018-2019 Approved Budget, to Receive Federal Election Activities Funds Attachments: Supervisor of Elections Correspondence Dated March 19, 2019 10. PUBLIC ITEMS A. PUBLIC HEARINGS B. PUBLIC DISCUSSION ITEMS 10.B.1. Request to Speak from Pickleball University Regarding Expansion of Courts Attachments: Request to Speak Form C. PUBLIC NOTICE ITEMS 11. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR MATTERS 12. DEPARTMENTAL MATTERS A. Community Development March26,2019 Page5of8 12.A.1. Final Recommendations from the Development Review and Permit Process Advisory Committee Attachments: Staff Report 11-6-18 BCC Meeting Minutes 01-16-19 DRPPAC Meeting Minutes Examples of PD Project Public Benefit Trade -Offs Proposed LDR Amendment 03-31-18 DRPPAC Littoral Zone Agenda Item 09-19-18 DRPPAC Littoral Zone Agenda Item B. Emergency Services C. General Services 1. Human Services 2. Sandridge Golf Club 3. Recreation D. Human Resources E. Office of Management and Budget F. Public Works 12.F.1. Egret Marsh Stormwater Park Tours Attachments: Staff Report Egret Marsh Tour Flyer Egret Marsh Presentation for TV G. Utilities Services 12.G.1. 286 +1- acre Purchase and Sale Agreement Attachments: Staff Report Purchase and Sale Agreement 12.G.2. Due Diligence and Project Review West Regional WWTF Reclaimed Water Storage, Tetra Tech Work Order No. 2 Attachments: Staff Report Tetra Tech CCNA-2018 Work Order No 2 12.G.3. Point Source Facilities Allocations and Canals Reclassification, Tetra Tech Work Order No. 3 Attachments: Staff Report Tetra Tech CCNA-2018 Work Order No 3 March 26, 2019 Page 6 of 8 12.G.4. Reclaimed Water Master Plan Attachments: Staff Report Work Order No 2 and supporting documents 12.G.5. Collier Creek Estates Subdivision Water Assessment Project: Contractor's Final Pay Request & Change Order #1; Resolution IV: Collier Creek Phases 1, 1A, and 1B; and, Resolution IV: Collier Creek Phase 2 and Harbor Point (Phase 3) Attachments: Staff Report Pay Application #5 - Final Pay Change Order #1 - Final Resolution IV - Collier Creek Phase 1 1A and 1B Resolution IV - Collier Creek Phase 2 and Phase 3 (Harbor Point) 13. COUNTY ATTORNEY MATTERS 13.A. First Amendment to Water, Wastewater and Reclaimed Water Franchise Agreement Between The City of Fellsmere and Indian River County Attachments: Staff Report Fellsmere Franchise Agreement Amendment Exhibit A — Legal Description, 7399 -Annexation & Location Boundary 14. COMMISSIONERS MATTERS A. Commissioner Bob Solari, Chairman B. Commissioner Susan Adams, Vice Chairman C. Commissioner Joseph E. Flescher D. Commissioner Peter D. O'Bryan 14.D.1. Request to Paint a Mural at the Main Library Attachments: Commissioner's Memorandum Request Letter and Details E. Commissioner Tim Zorc 14.E.1. Regulatory and Tax Fairness Within the Car Rental and Peer -to -Peer Car Sharing Industries Attachments: Commissioner's Memorandum 15. SPECIAL DISTRICTS AND BOARDS A. Emergency Services District B. Solid Waste Disposal District 15.B.1. Approval of Minutes Meeting of December 18, 2018 March 26, 2019 Page 7 of 8 15.B.2. Approval of Minutes Meeting of January 15, 2019 15.B.3. Approval of Minutes Meeting of January 22, 2019 15.B.4. Approval of Minutes Meeting February 5, 2019 15.B.5. Approval of Minutes Meeting of February 12, 2019 15.B.6. Approval of Minutes Meeting of February 19, 2019 15.B.7. Change Order No. 3 to Thalle (Bid #2018025) Attachments: Staff Report CDM Smith Letter of Recommendation and Change Order Form C. Environmental Control Board 16. ADJOURNMENT Except for those matters specifically exempted under the State Statute and Local Ordinance, the Board shall provide an opportunity for public comment prior to the undertaking by the Board of any action on the agenda, including those matters on the Consent Agenda. Public comment shall also be heard on any proposition which the Board is to take action which was either not on the Board agenda or distributed to the public prior to the commencement of the meeting. Anyone who may wish to appeal any decision which may be made at this meeting will need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made which includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal will be based. Anyone who needs a special accommodation for this meeting may contact the County's Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Coordinator at (772) 226-1223 at least 48 hours in advance of meeting. Anyone who needs special accommodation with a hearing aid for this meeting may contact the Board of County Commission Office at 772-226-1490 at least 20 hours in advance of the meeting. The full agenda is available on line at the Indian River County Website at www.ircgov.com The full agenda is also available for review in the Board of County Commission Office, the Indian River County Main Library, and the North County Library. Commission Meetings are broadcast live on Comcast Cable Channel 27 Rebroadcasts continuously with the following proposed schedule: Tuesday at 6:OOp.m. until Wednesday at 6:00 a.m., Wednesday at 9:00 a.m. until 5:00 p.m., Thursday at 1:00 p.m. through Friday Morning, and Saturday at 12:00 Noon to 5:00 p.m. March 26, 2019 Page 8 of 8 PROCLAMATION DESIGNATING THE DAY OF APRIL 9, 2019, AS EQUAL PAY DAY WHEREAS, 56 years after the passage of the 1963 Equal Pay Act, women, especially minority women, continue to suffer the consequences of unequal pay; and, WHEREAS, according to the US Census Bureau, women working full time, year round in 2016 typically earned 80% of what men earned doing the same or comparable work, indicating little change or progress in pay equity; and, WHEREAS, in 2009, the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act was signed into law, which gives back to employees their day in court to challenge a pay gap; and, WHEREAS, according to the National Committee on Pay Equity 2016, college-educated women working full time earn 1.2 million dollars less than their male peers do over a lifetime; and, WHEREAS, 42 percent of mothers with children under the age of 18 are their families' primary or sole breadwinners, making pay equity critical to families' economic security; and, WHEREAS, according to The Fight for Pay Equity: A State Roadmap for Florida, the median annual earnings in 2017 for men in Florida was $42,261 compared to $36,746 for women — an earnings ratio of just 87%, or fourth out of all states and the District of Columbia; and, WHEREAS, fair pay strengthens the security of families today and eases future retirement costs while enhancing the American economy. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT PROCLAIMED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA that the day of April 9, 2019, be designated as Equal Pay Day in Indian River County and the Board encourages all citizens to recognize the full value of women's skills and contributions to the labor force and to further encourage businesses to conduct an internal pay evaluation and to ensure women are being paid fairly and equally. Adopted this 26th day of March, 2019. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA Bob Solari, Chairman Susan Adams, Vice Chairman Peter D. O'Bryan Joseph E. Flescher Tim Zorc 1 A41 SIMPLE TRUTH ABOUT THE GENDER PAY GAP FALL 2018 EDITION ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The Fall 2018 edition of The Simple Truth about the Gender Pay Gap was written by AAUW Senior Researcher Kevin Miller and Senior Vice President for Public Policy and Research Deborah J. Vagins. Director of Federal Policy Anne Hedgepeth and State Policy Counsel Kate Nielson contributed additional writing, and Research Assistant Raina Nelson provided research support. We are grateful for the contributions of former members of our research, policy, and editorial teams who helped build The Simple Truth into a preeminent source for facts and guidance on the gender pay gap. AAUW thanks our members and supporters for their generous support in making this publication and organization possible, especially the members of the Mooneen Lecce Giving Circle. Published by AAUW 1310 L St. NW, Suite 1000 Washington, DC 20005 www.aauw.org connect@aauw.org 202.785.7700 Copyright © 2018 AAUW All rights reserved Printed in the United States of America First printing: 2011 160-18 © THE SIMPLE TRUTH ABOUT THE GENDER PAY GAP 1 Fall 2018 Edition AAUW • www.aauw.org TABLE OF CONTENTS Foreword 4 Introduction 5 What Is the Pay Gap? 7 Where Do the Data Come From? 7 State -Level Data 7 How Does the Pay Gap Affect Women of Different Demographics? 9 Race/Ethnicity 9 Age 10 Disability 10 Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity 11 How Does Education Affect the Pay Gap? 12 What Causes the Pay Gap? 14 Occupational Segregation 14 The Motherhood Penalty 16 Direct Gender and Race Discrimination and Bias 17 Conclusion 18 Recommendations 19 Individuals 19 Employers 19 Conducting Pay Audits 20 Prohibiting Retaliation for Wage Disclosure 20 Banning the Use of Prior Salary History 21 Government 22 Federal 22 State 24 What Should I Do If I Experience Pay Discrimination at Work? 25 Take Action with AAUW 26 Bibliography 27 AAUW • www.aauw.org THE SIMPLE TRUTH ABOUT THE GENDER PAY GAP 1 Fall 2018 Edition FOREWORD Research has been a key element of AAUW's work for women's pay equity since the release of our 1896 report Compensation in Certain Occupations of Women Who Have Received College or Other Special Training. Research empowers our members and other advocates with the facts they need to express the problems associated with the gender pay gap: It's real, it's persistent, and it's causing economic hardships for women and their families. And, as demonstrated by the fact that we've been working on this issue since 1896, the gap is closing too slowly. This year AAUW released its strategic plan with a vision to achieve equity for all. Closing the gender pay gap is a core element of our work to improve women's economic security, and our research informs and enhances our ongoing programs and advocacy that are pushing to end the pay gap. We continue to advocate for much-needed federal legislation that would strengthen fair -pay laws and level the playing field for women. We've also been proud to support and witness real progress at the local and state level, as lawmakers devise creative approaches to closing the gender pay gap. We promote best practices for employers, and we are working to empower women to secure their financial futures. In partnership with cities and organizations across the United States, our Start Smart and Work Smart salary negotiation workshops and newly -launched online e -learning tool are expanding to help millions of women secure the pay they deserve. Pay equity will continue to be an AAUW priority until the gap is fully eliminated. We hope this new edition of The Simple Truth motivates and empowers you as you join us in this cause. Julia T. Brown, Esq. Board Chair Kimberly Churches Chief Executive Officer THE SIMPLE TRUTH ABOUT THE GENDER PAY GAP 1 Fall 2018 Edition AAUW • www.aauw.org INTRODUCTION 1 n 2017, women working full time and year-round in the United States typically were paid just 80 percent of what men were paid, a gap of 20 percent (Fontenot et al., 2018). The gap has narrowed since 1960, due largely to women's progress in education and workforce participation and to men's wages rising at a slower rate. At the rate of change between 1960 and 2017, women are expected to reach pay equity with men in 2059. But even that slow progress has stalled in recent years. If change continues at the slower rate seen since 2001, women will not reach pay equity with men until 2106 (figure 1). The gender pay gap has lifelong financial effects. For one, it contributes directly to women's poverty. In 2017, 13 percent of American women ages 18-64 were living below the federal poverty level, compared with 9 percent of men. For ages 65 and older, 11 percent of women and 8 percent of men were living in poverty (Fontenot et al., 2018). The pay gap follows women throughout their time in the workforce, and even after they leave the workforce. Employers' use of women's prior salary history to set their wages in new jobs means wage discrimination carries forward from job to job, compounding over time. And because women typically are paid less than men during working years, women receive less income than men do from Social Security, pensions, and other sources when they retire. (Fischer & Hayes, 2013). Other benefits, such as disability and life insurance, are also smaller for women because these benefits usually are based on earnings. The impact of the pay gap has also broadened in recent years as a result of changes in family structure. Between 1967 and 2015, the proportion of mothers working outside the home and contributing at least FIGURE 1: Women's Median Annual Earnings as a Percentage of Men's for Full-time, Year-round Workers 1960-2017 and Projections Projection of 1960 — 2017 Trend Projection of 2001— 2017 Trend Equity in 2059 Equity in 2106 0 CO o O O 0 O 0 O 0 O O N O N O N O 100% 95% 90% 80% 75% 70% 65% 60% 55% 50% 0 O N Source: AAUW analysis of Fontenot (2018) AAUW • www.aauw.org THE SIMPLE TRUTH ABOUT THE GENDER PAY GAP 1 Fall 2018 Edition a quarter of the family's earnings rose from less than a third (28 percent) to nearly two-thirds (64 percent). Today, 42 percent of mothers with children under the age of 18 are their families' primary or sole breadwinners (Glynn, 2016). As families increasingly rely on women's wages to make ends meet, the gender pay gap directly affects more men and children as well. Closing the gender pay gap would have a large impact on women, their families, and the economy. Eliminating the gender pay gap by increasing women's pay to match that of men of the same age and education level would cut the poverty rate for all working women in half, regardless of their family structure. Closing the gender pay gap would also provide a boost to the economy. Providing equal pay to women would increase the wages paid into the economy by $513 billion, which represents 3 percent of the 2016 gross domestic product (Milli et al., 2017). This guide provides key facts about the gender pay gap in the United States. Included are breakdowns of the gender pay gap by race and ethnicity, by education, by age, and by occupation, as well as a detailed discussion of the causes of the gender pay gap. In addition, the guide provides detailed recommendations about how individuals, employers, and policymakers can contribute to closing these pay gaps. O THE SIMPLE TRUTH ABOUT THE GENDER PAY GAP 1 Fall 2018 Edition Because of the gender pay gap women have less money for a rainy day. AsIan a fl a `�'k ►•k+ i women i,' ►+ Whne +is62%'Nby- + Sl F women � i +it a++ axai, + x• Alattve k+ • • t " ss°�` x,�• 9i i r xaNowcion' Bock1i, l 6 c + x 4. , women +x Werner' x ,Ametttan i . ---'1c i ,aswAnodmelan Hilx4epone •k xi +Rs.. + 'i+ ' R + a J k ii [ NapMni `i0,.e*te*O''YN +1 i 1 Close the gap of flghttor(okpa ttrg. WOMEN IN THE U.S. CARE TYPICALLY PAID! [80 CENTS FOR EVERY DOLLAR PAID TO MEN. AAUW • www.aauw.org WHAT IS THE PAY GAP? The pay gap is the difference in men's and women's median earnings, usually reported as either the earnings ratio between men and women or as an actual pay gap, as defined below. The median value is the middle value, with equal numbers of full-time workers earning more and earning less. In 2017, median annual earnings in the United States for women and men working full time and year-round were $41,977 and $52,146, respectively (Fontenot et al., 2018). Women's Median earnings [Men's median earnings—Women's median earnings] Earnings Ratio = Pay Gap = Men's median earnings Men's median earnings $41,977 2017 Earnings Ratio = — 80.499 80% 2017 Pay Gap = $52,146 [$52,146—$41,977] $52,146 - 19.501 20% The ratio and gap above are calculated comparing women of all races and ethnicities to men of all races and ethnicities. The gap in the earnings for women of different racial and ethnic groups is usually calculated with white, non -Hispanic men as the comparison group. These comparisons are discussed in the following sections. Earnings can also be reported on a weekly basis. The gender pay gap in weekly earnings tends to be slightly smaller than the pay gap in terms of annual earnings. In 2017, the pay gap in median weekly earnings was 18 percent (U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, 2018a). WHERE DO THE DATA COME FROM? Federal agencies, such as the U.S. Census Bureau, the U.S. Department of Education, and the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, conduct surveys of individuals, households, and businesses to gather information about people's salaries and other earnings. Most reports on national workforce participation, pay, and pay differences depend on data from the Current Population Survey (CPS) (www.census.gov/cps), the country's primary source of labor force statistics. The CPS is a monthly survey with a sample of 100,000 households, sponsored jointly by the Census Bureau AAUW • www.aauw.org and the Bureau of Labor Statistics (U.S. Census Bureau, 2016). The estimate of the pay gap using weekly earnings is based on the annual average of median weekly earnings for the previous year, usually released every January by the Bureau of Labor Statistics (www.bts. gov/cps). The estimate of the pay gap using annual earnings is based on the CPS Annual Social and Economic Supplement, which is published each September by the Census Bureau and the Bureau of Labor Statistics. Compared with other government surveys, the CPS provides more detailed information on income. In recent years, this information has been published in the report Income and Poverty in the United States (Fontenot et al., 2018). STATE -LEVEL DATA A pay gap can also be calculated for each state (figure 2). The American Community Survey (ACS) (www. census.gov/acs) is a detailed annual survey distributed to a broad sample of U.S. households; it supplements the U.S. census of all Americans, which only occurs once per decade. The ACS is often used (including in this report) to estimate more detailed analyses of subpopulations and geographical areas, such as the THE SIMPLE TRUTH ABOUT THE GENDER PAY GAP 1 Fall 2018 Edition O 4-7 state -level pay gap and the gap for smaller racial/ethnic groups (e.g., Native Hawaiian or other Pacific Islander and American Indian or Alaska Native workers). The reason is that it includes more households -approximately 3 million per year -compared with the 100,000 surveyed in the CPS (U.S. Census Bureau, 2016). The ACS results are released annually in September, and briefs based on the survey can be found on the Census Bureau's website. According to ACS data, in 2017 the pay gap was smallest in California, where women were paid 89 percent of what men were paid. The largest was in Louisiana, where women were paid 69 percent of what men were paid (figure 2). Note: National data include workers ages 15 and older and are based on the Current Population Survey. State -level statistics include workers ages 16 and older are based on the American Community Survey. Source: Fontenot et al. (2018), U.S. Census Bureau (2018a) FIGURE 2: Median Annual Year-round Workers, Earnings and by State Men Earning Ratio for and Gender, 2017 Women $46,78_3 566,679 Full-time, Earnings Ratio 89% California _ ]i- 552,487 District of Columbia $74,877_1, 89% New. York $55,636 , - $48,901 $36,746 [ 88% [Florida , $42,261]' 87% [Delaware $54,657]T $47,052 S41,976 - S52,3811 [ 86% [Vermont $48,924]7 86% Maryland S61,26i 86% [Arizona $46,681 S39,675 85% [North.Carolina $46 r S38,784 538,784 [ 84% [Rhode Island _ _ $55,183' $46,146 $37,880 84% Nevada $45,439 [ 83% [New Mexico $42,690. $65,939,[ $62,9761 $35,523f 83% Massachusetts S54,646 $52,120 83% Connecticut [ 83% [Georgia $47,114,[ $38,958 $40,618 S45,798 $47,472 S36,8121 [ 83% [Maine 549,476 $55,814] [ T 82% Minnesota 82% [Alaska $57,9431 [ 82% [Tennessee $45,032.1 $50,9651 82% Oregon $41,572 82% J [Colorado 554;869 $44,733 $40,236 82% [Texas S49,414 [ [ 81% Hawaii S51,594 f 541,6641 81% United States $52,146 i S52,111 $41,977 S41,929 80% Pennsylvania [ 80%_ New Jersey i. $64;497 [ - $51,346 [ $51,563] $51,538 80% [Wisconsin S40,930 S40,964 [ 80% [North Dakota 79% [New Hampshire i - $57,966 r $57;690]r $46,044 79% Virginia S45,692 79% [Arkansas $43;266 $34,154 79% _ ] Iowa 1 S50,295 , S39,658 535,9641 79% [Montana [ $45,616 79% Kentucky $46,2891 S36,487 797. Missouri $47,436 f 537,339; 79% [Wahington [ $60,893 [ S47,681 78% Michigan [ $51,749 r-- S40,453 i _ 78% Ohio.[ $51,0001[ r $39,774[ S43,149, 78% 78% Illinois [ S55,585 [Wyoming [ S51,948 S40,200j 77% South.Carolina [ $45,477 $35,142; 77% Nebraska_ [ S50;293' $38,7261 537,931 S35,4881 77% 77% 77% Kansas [ S49,267, [ S46,114' [Oklahoma [South Dakota [ S46,170 $35,424 77% [Mississippi i 542,287 $32,441'[ 77% Idaho i $46,241 $47,42-5 $34,665 [ 75% West Virginia% $35,078 [ 74% 73% Alabama' $48,199 S35,414 [Indiana r $50,78) S37,167 73% [Utah 1 552,249_ S37,252 71% [Louisiana i $50,445 S34,708 69% 0 THE SIMPLE TRUTH ABOUT THE GENDER PAY GAP 1 Fall 2018 Edition AAUW • www.aauw.org A- $ HOW DOES THE PAY GAP AFFECT WOMEN OF DIFFERENT DEMOGRAPHICS? The pay gap affects women from all backgrounds, at all ages, and of all levels of educational achievement, although earnings and the gap vary depending on a woman's individual situation. RACE/ETHNICITY The overall gender pay gap is useful for understanding the impact of gender on women's pay, but there is no single gender pay gap or race pay gap since women of different backgrounds have very different experiences and earnings. However, across all racial and ethnic groups, women working full time are typically paid less than men in the same group (figure 3). Among full-time workers in 2017, Hispanic or Latina, American Indian or Alaska Native (AIAN), black or African American, and Native Hawaiian or other Pacific Islander (NH PI) women had tower median annual earnings compared with non - Hispanic white and Asian women. 580,000 S70,000 S60,000 $50,000 $40,000 $30,000 $20,000 $10,000 $0 FIGURE 3: Median Annual Earnings, by Race/Ethnicity and Gender, 2017 66,221 S58 014 $51,824 $31,364 $33,571 $38,887 $40,370 $35;96 $42,135 $45,506 Hispanic or Latina/o Source: U.S. Census Bureau (2018a) American Indian or Alaska Native Black or Native Hawaiian and White African American Other Pacific Islander (non -Hispanic) Asian Because non -Hispanic white men are the largest and most advantaged demographic group in the labor force, they are often used as a benchmark for the earnings of women of different races and ethnicities. Compared with the salaries of white men, Asian women's salaries show the smallest gender pay gap, at 85 percent of white men's earnings. The gap was largest for Hispanic women, who were paid only 53 percent of what white men were paid in 2017 (figure 4). AAUW • www.aauw.org FIGURE 4: Women's Earnings as a Percentage of White Men's Earnings, by Race/Ethnicity, 2017 Note: Based on median annual earnings of full-time, year-round workers. CPS includes workers 15 and older, ACS includes workers 16 and older. The CPS is the preferred data source for income estimates, but lacks sufficient sample size for reporting on smaller demographic groups. See page 7 for a more detailed description of the CPS and ACS. Source: U.S. Census Bureau (2018a, 2018b) THE SIMPLE TRUTH ABOUT THE GENDER PAY GAP I Fall 2018 Edition O Current Population Survey (CPS) American Community Survey (ACS) Hispanic or Latina 53% 54% Black or African American 61% 62% . White (non -Hispanic) 77% 78% Asian 85% 89% Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander -- 62% American Indian or Alaska Native -- 58% Note: Based on median annual earnings of full-time, year-round workers. CPS includes workers 15 and older, ACS includes workers 16 and older. The CPS is the preferred data source for income estimates, but lacks sufficient sample size for reporting on smaller demographic groups. See page 7 for a more detailed description of the CPS and ACS. Source: U.S. Census Bureau (2018a, 2018b) THE SIMPLE TRUTH ABOUT THE GENDER PAY GAP I Fall 2018 Edition O Though these are the major racial and ethnic divisions for which the U.S. government routinely provides pay breakdowns, it's important to recognize that the figures can obscure substantial variation within those groups. For instance, among Asian women in the United States, women of Indian and Chinese descent are on average paid better than the typical white man, but Burmese, Hmong, and Laotian women on average are paid significantly less -60 percent or less of what white men are paid (National Partnership for Women and Families, 2018). AGE Earnings for both female and mate full-time workers tend to increase with age, though earnings increase more slowly after age 45 and even decrease after age 55. The gender pay gap also grows with age, and differences among older workers are considerably larger than differences among younger workers. In 2017, for full-time workers ages 20-24, women were paid 90 percent of what men were paid on a weekly basis. As workers grow older and progress in their careers, median earnings for women grow more slowly than median earnings for men, resulting in larger gaps for women (figure 5). Women 55-64 years old are paid 78 percent as much as men in the same age range, a gap that is more than double the gap for women ages 20-24. $1,200 $1,000 S800 $600 $400 $200 $0 FIGURE 5: Median Weekly Earnings, by Gender and Age, 2017 ■ Women ■ Men XX% Women's earnings as a percentage of men's earnings S1,062 $1,103 $1,098 16 to 19 years 20 to 24 years 25 to 34 years 35 to 44 years 45 to 54 years 55 to 64 years 65 years and older Note: Based on median usual weekly earnings of full-time wage and salary workers, 2017 annual averages Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (2018c) DISABILITY Disability status is a challenging demographic to capture because it includes many different disabilities and conditions. In the current ACS questionnaire, disability is measured by answering questions related to six disability types: hearing, vision, cognitive, ambulatory, self-care, and independent living (U.S. Census Bureau, 2017). People with disabilities are paid significantly less than people without a disability. In 2017, median pay for women with disabilities was 72 percent that of men with disabilities; women with a disability made 48 percent as much as men without a disability (figure 6). (These data include all workers regardless of full-time or year-round status.) 43) THE SIMPLE TRUTH ABOUT THE GENDER PAY GAP 1 Fall 2018 Edition AAUW • www.aauw.org There are many factors that contribute to the pay gap for individuals with disabilities, ranging from lack of access to educational and employment opportunities to direct bias and discrimination. One likely factor is a provision of the Fair Labor Standards Act, which makes it legal to pay some people with disabilities less than minimum wage. About 150,000 Americans with disabilities are paid less than minimum wage, in some cases as little as pennies per hour (U.S. Department of Labor, 2018; U.S. Department of Justice, 2015). SEXUAL ORIENTATION AND GENDER IDENTITY A study of the pay received by gay men, lesbians, and bisexual men and women found that all three groups have labor market outcomes that diverge from heterosexual workers. Gay men are paid less than straight men, while lesbians are paid more than straight women, but both differences are attributed primarily to differences in family structure: Gay men do not receive the "fatherhood bonus" that many straight men receive, while lesbians are more likely than straight women to avoid the "motherhood penalty" due to a lower likelihood of having children (see below on the causes of the pay gap). Bisexuals seem to face lower earnings primarily as a result of discrimination (Mize, 2016). However, the gender pay gap is consistent across sexual orientation: Regardless of sexual orientation, women tend to have lower earnings than men. As a result, eliminating the gender pay gap would lower poverty rates for couples that include at least one woman (Williams Institute, 2015). When analyzing the gender pay gap, it's also important to include people who do not identify with the gender they were assigned at birth. The Williams Institute estimates that 1.4 million adults in the United States identify as transgender (2016). More than one-quarter of respondents to a survey of transgender people reported an income of less than $20,000 annually, while another analysis found that 15 percent of transgender people have earnings less than $10,000 annually, compared to 4 percent of the general population (Grant et al., 2011). Transgender people frequently experience harassment and discrimination AAUW • www.aauw.org FIGURE 6: Median Annual Earnings by Disability Status and Gender, 2017 $50,000 $40,000 $30,000 $20,000 $10,000 SO With a disability ■ Women ■ Men Source. U.S. Census Bureau (2018a) No disability in the workplace because of their gender identity, as well as discrimination and obstacles in other domains that further harm their economic security (U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, 2018a; Center for American Progress, 2015). People who transition from male to female gender expression experience a drop in pay after the transition, while those who transition from female to male gender expression see no difference in pay or even a small increase (Grant et al., 2011; Schilt and Wiswall, 2008). The experiences of transgender people provide insight into gender stereotypes and bias and how these factors play a role in the gender pay gap. While the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) does currently assert that lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender workers are protected from wage discrimination under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, 2018a), these groups still lack uniform federal legislative protections against workplace discrimination. Federal court rulings and state and local laws are inconsistent, meaning that workplace protections for LGBT workers are not sufficiently robust or comprehensive with respect to challenging their wage gaps. THE SIMPLE TRUTH ABOUT THE GENDER PAY GAP I Fall 2018 Edition Q A- I I HOW DOES EDUCATION AFFECT THE PAY GAP? As a rule, earnings increase as years of education increase for both men and women. Though more education is an effective tool for increasing earnings, women's median earnings are less than men's median earnings at every level of academic achievement (figure 7). In Graduating to a Pay Gap: The Earnings of Women and Men One Year after College Graduation, AAUW found that just one year after college graduation, women were paid 82 percent of what men were paid (AAUW, 2012). $2,000 $1,750 $1,500 $1,250 $1,000 $750 $500 $250 $0 FIGURE 7: Median Weekly Earnings, by Level of Education and Gender, 2017 • Women ■ Men XX% Women's earnings as a percentage of men's earnings $1,737 S1,378 S584 Less than a high school diploma High School graduate Some College or Associate degree Bachelor's degree Advanced degree Note: Based on median usual weekly earnings of full-time wage and salary workers, ages 25 and older, 2017 annual averages. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (2018b) Across all racial and ethnic groups, American women now earn more college and postgraduate degrees than men (U.S. Department of Education, 2016b). Though education does not eliminate the gender pay gap, the success of women in postsecondary education is helping to narrow the overall gender pay gap. Without women's greater educational attainment, the current gender pay gap would be larger (Blau and Kahn, 2017). However, women with college degrees who work full time make, on average, 26 percent less than their male peers with college degrees (figure 7). It is important to note that this gap is larger than the gap for women overall; although women with degrees have higher earnings than women without degrees, men with degrees have even higher earnings. And even when ® THE SIMPLE TRUTH ABOUT THE GENDER PAY GAP I Fall 2018 Edition women gain degrees in more lucrative majors and pursue higher -paying occupations, women still tend to be concentrated in lower -paying subfields and are paid less across fields, even with advanced degrees (Carnevale, 2018). Furthermore, earnings at different education levels are affected by race and ethnicity, as well as gender. White women are paid more than black and Hispanic women at all education levels (figure 8). Research suggests that differences in education and other measurable factors explain part of the difference in earnings between racial and ethnic groups. However, as is the case with gender, part of the racial and ethnic pay gap cannot be explained by other factors known to affect earnings and is likely due to discrimination. AAUW • www.aauw.org $1,600 $1,400 S1,200 $1,000 $800 S600 S400 $200 S FIGURE 8: Median Weekly Earnings of Women, by Race/Ethnicity and Level of Education, 2017 $1,462 $1,306 S573_$539 $627 $591 Less than a high school diploma High School graduate $663 $717 $ $633 Some College or Associate degree $9i $897 $1,031$1,090 Bachelor's degree • Hispanic or Latina ■ Black or African American • White (non -Hispanic) ■ Asian Advanced degree Note: Based on median usual weekly earnings of full-time wage and salary workers, ages 25 and older, 2017 annual averages. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (2018b) As discussed above, the gender pay gap persists across education levels and is worse for black and Hispanic women, even among college graduates. As a result of the pay gap, women who complete college degrees are less able than men initially to afford college and then less able to pay off their student loans promptly afterwards. As a result, women pay more in interest and make payments for a longer time. Women take on larger initial loans than men, with black women holding more debt than any other group when graduating with a bachelor's degree. AAUW's research estimates that women hold nearly two-thirds—or almost $900 million—of outstanding student debt in the United States (AAUW, 2018a). Student debt and the pay gap mean that women have a more difficult time making ends meet while they are repaying their loans. In 2012, among students who graduated in 2007-08, women working full time had paid off 33 percent of their student loan debt on average, while men working full time had paid off 44 percent of their debt. Black AAUW • www.aauw.org and Hispanic women working full time are paid considerably less than men from these groups, and they struggle to pay off student loans promptly: Four years after graduation, black and Hispanic women had paid off less than 10 percent of their debt—much less than other women and men (figure 9). While repaying student loans, approximately 1 in 3 female college graduates experience difficulty meeting their financial obligations, compared to 1 in 4 men; more than half of black women with bachelor's degrees experience financial difficulties while repaying student loans (AAUW, 2018a). FIGURE 9: Cumulative Student Debt for 2007-08 College Graduates, by Gender and Race/Ethnicity Source: AAUW analysis of U.S. Department of Education (2015) THE SIMPLE TRUTH ABOUT THE GENDER PAY GAP 1 Fall 2018 Edition A-13 Total average debt owed, 2009 Total average debt owed, 2012 Percentage of debt paid off, 2009-12 Men $22,656 $12,793 44% Women $24,126 $16,105 33% Asian S19,687 $7,679 61% White (non -Hispanic) $24,479 S15,417 37% Black or African American S26,535 $24,116 9% Hispanic or Latina $21,626 $21,026 3% Source: AAUW analysis of U.S. Department of Education (2015) THE SIMPLE TRUTH ABOUT THE GENDER PAY GAP 1 Fall 2018 Edition A-13 WHAT CAUSES THE PAY GAP? The gap of 20 cents on the dollar between men and women working full time and year- round is a statistical fact, though the overall pay gap summarizes a huge diversity of women and life circumstances. The origins of the pay gap are also more complicated than a single cause. From birth, gendered perceptions and expectations mean that boys and girls have different experiences and take different paths through education and training on their way to the workforce. Factors such as race, class, sexual orientation, and disability mean different women have different opportunities and advantages. Once in the workforce, women and men again face gendered perceptions, expectations, and other biases. As a result of the cumulative impact of gendered experiences and biases, women and men participate in the workforce in different ways and are treated differently by employers. As noted above, women's greater educational attainment is helping to shrink the gap overall. Furthermore, unionization exerts a larger positive effect on women's wages than men's, also decreasing the size of the gap (U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, 2018c). But the remaining 20 cent pay gap is the result of the cumulative effect of the ways that men's and women's experiences and treatment in the workforce still differ and reduce women's earnings. Men and women may be steered toward different industries and occupations. Sectors and jobs where men tend to work are, on average, better compensated than those where women tend to work. Moreover, due to work and home structures still built around the presumption that women will be primary caretakers, women are more likely to drop out of the workforce temporarily as a result of parenting or other family obligations. Women of color experience outcomes and pay that are worse than would be expected as a result of race and gender separately, suggesting that gendered racism is a distinct contributor to the gap. The remaining gap apart from these factors cannot be explained by other observable characteristics. Many researchers attribute it to direct gender bias and discrimination. THE SIMPLE TRUTH ABOUT THE GENDER PAY GAP 1 Fall 2018 Edition OCCUPATIONAL SEGREGATION Early in boys' and girls' educational experiences, there are gendered expectations regarding what boys and girls are "good" at or "should" be focusing on. These different expectations, as well as external pressure to conform to stereotypes about gender roles, follow women and men into classes and extracurricular activities, their college majors, and their career directions. In 2017 the U.S. civilian workforce included 160 million full- and part-time employed workers. Of these, 53 percent were men, and 47 percent were women (U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, 2018d). But women and men tend to work in different kinds of jobs. Women are disproportionately represented in education, office and administrative support, and health care occupations. Men are disproportionately represented in construction, maintenance and repair, and production and transportation occupations (U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, 2018e). Segregation by occupation is a major factor behind the pay gap. Even though a pay gap exists within nearly every occupational field, jobs traditionally associated with men tend to pay better than traditionally female -dominated jobs that require the same level of skill (Hegewisch & Hartmann, 2014). Occupational segregation is facilitated through the practice of "steering" Steering occurs when women are channeled into jobs with lower pay (or lower long-term pay potential) than other similar jobs, based on the AAUW • www.aauw.org A•ly perception of "women's work." Therefore, compensation disparities can arise where employers track women into low-paying jobs or limit their opportunities for promotions or transfers to better jobs. Occupational gender segregation has decreased over the last 40 years, largely due to women moving into formerly male -dominated jobs, especially during the 1970s and 1980s, and to faster growth of more evenly mixed -gender occupations in the 1990s. But integration has stalled since the early 2000s. Occupational segregation also continues to affect some women more than others: Of all racial and ethnic groups, Hispanic women and men are the least likely to work in the same jobs (Hegewisch & Hartmann, 2014). Working in traditionally male fields will likely improve wages for individual women, but it is unlikely to eliminate the pay gap. Women in such male -dominated jobs as computer programming still face a pay gap compared with men in the field, even though women in such jobs may be paid higher salaries than women in traditionally female fields. And moving into a higher - paying field can have diminishing returns for women over time. A study of 50 years of U.S. workforce data concluded that when an influx of women enters a previously male -dominated profession, average wages for the occupation as a whole actually decrease, even for men in the field (Levanon et al., 2009). Women are not drawn to low-paying fields because they desire low pay; the work that women do is valued less than work done by men because that work is done by women. Men are paid more watching cars (as parking lot attendants) than women are paid watching children (as child care workers), but few would argue that the former is more intrinsically valuable work (U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, 2018e). The research and data indicate, therefore, that women experience pay gaps in nearly every line of work, regardless of occupational qualifications or setting. Among the 114 occupations held by at least 50,000 men and 50,000 women in 2017, 107 had a statistically significant pay gap favoring men and six had non- significant gaps. Only one occupation had a "reverse" gap favoring women. Considering the gap in pay, along with the number of women employed in an occupation, allows for a rough estimate of how much women in that occupation could gain from equal pay: 519.6 billion for financial managers, 519.5 billion for doctors and surgeons, 510.7 billion for lawyers, and 510.0 billion for chief executives. Below are the gender pay gaps for the 10 largest occupations for women (figure 10). FIGURE 10: Women Employed, Earnings, Pay Ratio, and Total Occupation Gap, Largest Occupations for Women, 2017 Source: U.S. Census Bureau (2018a) AAUW • www.aauw.org THE SIMPLE TRUTH ABOUT THE GENDER PAY GAP I Fall 2018 Edition Women Employed Men's Median Earnings Women's Median Earnings Gender Pay Ratio Occupation Gap Registered nurses 2,092,489 571,590 565,612 92% $12,509,000,000 Secretaries and administrative assistants 2,060,289 542,566 $38,470 90% $8,439,000,000 Elementary and middle school teachers 1,933,074 $55,197 $50,766 92% $8,565,000,000 Customer service representatives 1,196,513 $37,623 532,893 87% 55,660,000,000 First-line supervisors of retail sales workers 1,177,835 $47,774 535,217 74% 514,790,000,000 Nursing, psychiatric, and home health aides 1,071,789 $30,125 526,816 89% $3,547,000,000 Accountants and auditors 1,014,827 $77,320 $60,280 78% 517,293,000,000 Office clerks, general 734,622 $39,160 $35,226 90% $2,890,000,000 First-line supervisors of office and administrative support workers 729,985 $57,466 $46,555 81% $7,965,000,000 Bookkeeping, accounting, and auditing clerks 723,342 545,254 $39,939 88% 53,845,000,000 Source: U.S. Census Bureau (2018a) AAUW • www.aauw.org THE SIMPLE TRUTH ABOUT THE GENDER PAY GAP I Fall 2018 Edition THE MOTHERHOOD PENALTY Becoming a parent produces very different professional outcomes for women and men. Mothers working full time are paid 71 percent as much as fathers (National Women's Law Center, 2018). Taking time away from the workforce or cutting back hours, both more common scenarios for mothers than fathers, hurts earnings (Bertrand et al., 2010). Many employers and industries still prioritize long, continuous, traditional work hours rather than flexible schedules, a preference that tends to put women with children at a disadvantage (Goldin, 2014). In 2017, 71 percent of mothers of children under age 18 participated in the labor force, compared with 93 percent of fathers of children under age 18 (U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, 2018f). Many working mothers also encounter a "motherhood penalty," which extends beyond their actual time out of the workforce. Experimental studies have documented that employers are less likely to hire mothers (including mothers who never left the workforce) than they are to hire women without children, and when employers do make an offer to a mother, they offer her a lower salary than they offer to other women (Correll £r Benard, 2007; Kricheli-Katz, 2012). The magnitude of the penalty for mothers in the workforce has remained steady for the past few decades or even increased slightly for some mothers after accounting for education and work experience (Lee et al., 2018). Fathers, in contrast, do not suffer a penalty compared with other working men. Many fathers actually receive higher wages after having a child, known as the "fatherhood bonus" (Killewald, 2013; Budig, 2014). The very different experiences of women and men who become parents are the result of gendered norms and expectations, institutional systems built around a worker who is not a primary caretaker, and a lack of systemic supports for new parents in the United States. Nearly every other country in the world mandates access to paid leave for new mothers, and most developed countries provide similar leave for new fathers. In the United States, there is no national paid parental leave right or system and only 15 percent of workers receive paid parental leave from their employers (Raub et al., 2018, U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics 2017). As a result, most new parents must cobble together other types of paid leave, take shorter leaves than they would prefer, or return to work as soon as possible after childbirth to avoid lost wages. Another factor making it difficult for women to participate fully in the American workforce is the expectation they will continue to be primary caretakers. Compounding this is limited availability and high price of child care, especially care for young infants and toddlers. The average price of child care in the United States is $8,800 per child per year, and the average for infants in child care center settings is $11,100. Costs are much higher in cities and states with higher costs of living (Child Care Aware of America, 2017). Paying for child care for one or more children may be impractical or impossible for parents with low incomes, who are disproportionately women. As a result, mothers who might otherwise remain in the workforce may lose years of earnings and salary history as they care for their children. THE SIMPLE TRUTH ABOUT THE GENDER PAY GAP 1 Fall 2018 Edition AAUW • www.aauw.org DIRECT GENDER AND RACE DISCRIMINATION AND BIAS Not all of the gender and race pay gaps can be explained by observable differences in college major, occupation, work hours, and time out of the workforce. Direct discrimination and bias against women in the workplace are also culprits in the pay gap. Each year, the EEOC receives thousands of sex, race, and other pay discrimination complaints, and many of these are decided or resolved in favor of the person who filed the charge (U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, 2018b). In part due to persistent sex discrimination, women are also less likely than men to reach the highest -paying leadership and executive positions. In 2015, women held only 26 percent of private -sector executive positions, and women of color are particularly unlikely to hold such positions (AAUW, 2016). In addition, women make up just 22 percent of chief executives of nonprofit organizations with annual budgets of $50 million or more—despite making up about 75 percent of the nonprofit workforce—and female chief executives of nonprofits experience a pay gap relative to men who lead organizations of similar size (AAUW, 2018b). How do we know that discrimination and bias directly affect women's pay? Researchers look for the "unexplained" pay gap after statistically accounting for other factors. For instance, after accounting for college major, occupation, economic sector, hours worked, months unemployed since graduation, GPA, type of undergraduate institution, institution selectivity, age, geographical region, and marital status, AAUW found a remaining 7 percent difference between the earnings of male and female college graduates one year after graduation. That gap jumped to 12 percent 10 years after college graduation (AAUW, 2012; AAUW Educational Foundation, 2007). Other researchers have reached similar conclusions about gender discrimination and the pay gap when controlling for certain factors. For instance, a study of medical researchers found an unexplained gap of 6 percent between comparable men and women in the field, and a recent study of the American workforce as a whole found an unexplained gap of 8 percent (Jagsi et al., 2012; Blau & Kahn, 2017). As noted above, women of different racial and ethnic groups in the United States have widely varying gaps in their earnings when compared to white men. These statistics reflect cumulative disadvantages resulting from different circumstances and opportunities, including direct and structural racial bias, the effect of gender bias, and the intersectional effect of belonging to groups that experience unique stereotypes and bias (e.g. black women). For instance, while alt women are underrepresented in executive positions relative to their labor force participation, black women are the most underrepresented of any group (AAUW, 2016). The intersectional impact of race and gender biases contributes to the overall gender pay gap, as women of color experience pay outcomes that are worse than would be predicted by the additive effect of race and gender separately (Blau and Kahn, 2017). In other words, when closely examining the impact of race and gender (as well as other factors) on the pay of black men, black women, white men, and white women, it is clear that black women experience a large gap that cannot be attributed to other observable characteristics, such as occupation and education, or by race or gender separately (Paul et al., 2018). Black women's education and other labor force characteristics are now such that they would be expected to be paid more than black men if gender bias were not a factor. Yet they are still paid less (Paul et al., 2018). Women of different racial and ethnic backgrounds all have different experiences of discrimination, but biases based on race, gender, and the intersection of race and gender all contribute measurably to the overall gap. AAUW • www.aauw.org THE SIMPLE TRUTH ABOUT THE GENDER PAY GAP 1 Fall 2018 Edition CONCLUSION The gender pay gap is persistent and ongoing: It has closed by less than a nickel during the 21st century. Statistics show clearly that women experience a pay gap in every state, at every age, across all racial and ethnic groups, and in nearly every occupation. Women working full time in the United States are paid 20 percent less than men, despite greater educational attainment. This gap is a result of gender norms and bias that are woven throughout women's experiences in the workforce. Estimates of the "unexplained" pay gap are often treated as estimates of the effect of direct pay discrimination on women's earnings, but the impact of occupational segregation, motherhood penalties, and racial biases on women's careers and earnings cannot be dismissed, even if researchers can statistically account for them. Moreover, there are factors that exacerbate the pay gap over a woman's career. For example, the common employer practice of basing a worker's starting pay and pay increases on previous pay carries forward any earlier pay gap from job to job. Additionally, the practice of penalizing workers for discussing wages in the workplace makes it harder for individual women to detect or address the effects of bias and discrimination, making the gap resistant to change. Closing the gender pay gap requires addressing all of the causes of the gap by changing cultural norms, improving employer behavior, and implementing public policy initiatives. AAUW takes a multipronged approach that calls on individuals, employers, and policymakers to end the gender pay gap for the benefit of women, their families, and society. THE SIMPLE TRUTH ABOUT THE GENDER PAY GAP 1 Fall 2018 Edition AAUW • www.aauw.org RECOMMENDATIONS The gender pay gap is unlikely to go away on its own, but there are many things that can make a difference. Here are some steps that individuals, employers, and policymakers can take to ensure fair pay. INDIVIDUALS Because most employers have latitude when it comes to pay, negotiating one's salary can pay off. While women can't negotiate around discrimination, it is helpful for them to know their market value and to push for better wages. Traditionally, it has been socially acceptable for men to negotiate for raises because negotiating conforms to the stereotype of men as assertive. But negotiation is especially tricky for women because some behaviors that work for men, like self -promotion and assertiveness, may backfire on women (Carter Er Silva, 2011; Bowles & Babcock, 2013). Knowing what your skills are worth, making clear what you bring to the table, emphasizing common goals, and maintaining a positive attitude are some negotiation tactics that have been shown to be effective (Babcock Er Laschever, 2008). To empower women with the skills they need to successfully negotiate salary and benefits, AAUW offers salary negotiation workshops. Start Smart is designed to help college women who are about to enter the job market, and Work Smart offers training to women already in the labor force, training them to negotiate for a new job, raise, or promotion. These workshops help women determine their market worth based on their skills, experience, performance, qualifications, and responsibilities on the job. And they provide the tools and business strategies women need to successfully negotiate for fair pay for the rest of their careers. Additionally, individuals can also take steps to influence employers and governments—letters to your legislators and local papers, blogs, and tweets are just a few examples. Joining an organization like AAUW can make all of these activities easier, especially if you use our templates and resources and connect with our network of activists. EMPLOYERS Equal pay is important for legal and ethical reasons, but it can also be good for employers' bottom lines and employee recruitment and retention. Believing that an employer is fair improves workers' morale (Cohen-Charash Er Spector, 2001; Kim, 2009). Work performance has also been linked to the perception of organizational justice (Colquitt et al., 2001). In other words, workers who believe that they are paid fairly are more likely to contribute their best effort to the job. Surveys have also found that employee satisfaction is highly connected to whether employees feel they AAUW o www.aauw.org are paid fairly and how fair and transparent their employer's approach to pay is, but women are more likely to feel "in the dark" about compensation in the workplace (Payscale, 2017; Glassdoor, 2015). There are many practices employers can voluntarily implement to help close the wage gap, including analyzing their wage data and conducting regular pay audits; prohibiting retaliation against their employees for discussing, disclosing or inquiring about their wages; and eliminating the practice of using prior salary history to set the wages of new employees. THE SIMPLE TRUTH ABOUT THE GENDER PAY GAP 1 Fall 2018 Edition Conducting Pay Audits Consider the example of one employer that voluntarily decided to audit its pay practices: In 2015, Salesforce performed a comprehensive pay audit and analysis of 17,000 employees that led to salary adjustments for 6 percent of employees and a 33 percent increase in the number of women who were promoted that year (Zarya, 2016). Salesforce's actions garnered attention across the country. Understanding the critical role employers play in ensuring equal pay for the nation's workforce, the Obama administration announced a White House Equal Pay Pledge for private sector companies committed to equal pay for their employees. These companies committed to conducting annual gender pay analyses across occupations; reviewing hiring and promotion processes and procedures to reduce unconscious bias and structural barriers; and embedding equal pay efforts into broader company initiatives (The White House, 2016). After the end of the administration, Simmons College now hosts the Employers for Pay Equity Consortium. As of September 2018, more than 35 companies had joined the consortium, including Delta Airlines, Deloitte, Facebook, Gap Inc., General Motors, Johnson Er Johnson, Microsoft, PepsiCo, and Staples. Employers can use audits to monitor and address gender pay differences to great effect. For example, Minnesota requires public -sector employers to conduct a pay -equity study every few years and eliminate pay disparities between female -dominated and male -dominated jobs requiring comparable levels of expertise (Minnesota Management and Budget). Employers use a job -evaluation tool to compare jobs on such dimensions as the complexity of issues encountered; the depth and breadth of knowledge needed; the nature of interpersonal contacts required; and the physical working conditions. This allows employers to identify different jobs—for example, delivery van drivers and clerk typists—that require similar levels of knowledge and responsibility. Employers then compare wages of predominantly female jobs with those of predominantly male jobs of comparable skill levels. If they find that women are consistently paid less than men for jobs requiring similar levels of knowledge and responsibility, the employer makes the necessary salary increases. The state's efforts have been hugely successful: Since the 1970s, Minnesota has virtually eliminated the pay gap in public -sector jobs of comparable value (Legislative Office on the Economic Status of Women, 2016). Companies must be sure that they continue to analyze pay decisions— when salaries are set, when job functions change, when bonuses are awarded or raises given—to ensure that salaries remain equitable. Prohibiting Retaliation for Wage Disclosure One significant reason the gender pay gap is closing so slowly is that pay disparities are notoriously difficult to detect. Generally, salaries are not public. Because many employees have no way of knowing when they are shortchanged, it's hard for them to contest pay discrimination on their own. Furthermore, employees may face retaliation for inquiring about wages because some workplaces have pay secrecy policies that punish or even fire employees for disclosing or inquiring about their own wages or the wages of a co-worker. Such punitive pay -secrecy policies make it difficult for workers to remedy wage disparities because they cannot find out if they're being paid less. In 2011, a national survey by the Institute for Women's Policy Research (IWPR) found that about half'of employees said they worked in a setting where managers either formally prohibited or discouraged discussions of wages and salaries (Institute for Women's Policy Research, 2011). According to IWPR, pay secrecy was particularly common in the private sector, where 61 percent of employees are either discouraged or prohibited from discussing wage and salary information. CI THE SIMPLE TRUTH ABOUT THE GENDER PAY GAP 1 Fall 2018 Edition AAUW • www.aauw.org Pt =lb In contrast, only 14 percent of public -sector employees in the IWPR study reported that pay discussions were either discouraged or prohibited. This higher degree of transparency in the public sector may be related to the greater gender pay equity found in the federal government. Federal workers can easily see how their salaries compare with others at their grade level and geographical location. The U.S. Office of Personnel Management makes public the salary and wage range for each level of federal worker and additional locality pay for areas where the cost of living is higher (U.S. Office of Personnel Management, 2016). Among white-collar federal workers, women were paid 87 percent of what men were paid in 2012, compared with 77 percent in the workforce as a whole in 2012 (U.S. Office of Personnel Management, 2014). In recognition of this problem, President Obama signed an executive order in 2014 banning retaliation for wage disclosure for federal contracting employers, reaching approximately 26 million workers. Moreover, there are limited protections under state laws and the federal National Labor Relations Act, and the_EEOC recently issued guidance describing when employers' retaliation for employees' wage disclosure or inquiries may violate Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. However, these protections do not reach all employees and circumstances. Therefore, as we continue to fight for uniform federal protections, as a best practice, AAUW recommends that employers do not impose punitive pay -secrecy policies in the workplace. They hurt employees' ability to share information to facilitate equal opportunities in the workplace and impede effective enforcement of pay discrimination laws. A more open approach can foster the perception that compensation is handled fairly and can improve employee morale (Payscale, 2017). Banning the Use of Prior Salary History The practice of using past salaries to set current wages perpetuates the gender pay gap because it assumes that prior salaries were fairly established by previous employers. Relying on salary history allows a new employer to continue underpaying a woman who faced a pay gap and lost wages due to bias or discrimination at a previous job. Salary history questions can also introduce bias and discrimination into the recruitment process of a company that may be attempting to avoid it. Employers should prohibit the use of salary history and instead use market research to determine what the position is worth to the organization. If a woman starts her career with a pay gap tainted by prior discrimination, it's likely to follow her from job to job. As discussed below, there are also state and federal efforts working to eliminate these practices, but in the meantime, employers can take this important action on their own. LATINAS IN THE U.S. FOR EVERY DOLLAR PAID TO WHITE MEN. AAU , AAUW • www.aauw.org THE SIMPLE TRUTH ABOUT THE GENDER PAY GAP 1 Fall 2018 Edition 49 GOVERNMENT Federal Congress plays a vital role in addressing discrimination in employment. But current legal protections have not yet ensured equal pay for women and men. Congress should act and pass laws like the Paycheck Fairness Act, which would update the Equal Pay Act of 1963. The Paycheck Fairness Act would close existing loopholes in the law; strengthen penalties for equal pay violations; prohibit the use of salary history in employment decisions; prohibit retaliation against workers who voluntarily discuss or disclosure their wages; and support data collection and research. In addition, Congress should take action on the Pay Equity for All Act, which would prohibit employers from using salary history to determine future pay. Additionally, Congress should move forward with the Fair Pay Act, which would provide solutions aimed at curbing the financial impact of occupational segregation for women and workers of color. Congress can also address one of the gap's underlying causes by creating a national system of paid parental leave. The Family and Medical Insurance Leave (FAMILY) Act would create a national paid family and medical leave insurance program for all workers. Congress should also make it easier for families to deal with the costs associated with child care responsibilities by funding early childhood education programs and improving access to high-quality and affordable child care. Moreover, strong administrative protections to ensure equal pay are necessary too. However, some administrative actions put in place by the Obama administration are now under attack. In 2016, the EEOC announced a new pay data collection, which would have begun collecting critical wage data based on sex, race, and ethnicity from private employers and from federal contractors with 100 or more employees. This data collection could help the EEOC better identify wage discrimination and encourage voluntary compliance by companies. The Trump administration halted this collection. AAUW urges the administration to reinstate this critical collection. ® THE SIMPLE TRUTH ABOUT THE GENDER PAY GAP 1 Fall 2018 Edition FEDERAL EQUAL PAY LEGISLATION TIME LINE 1918 • Following World War I, the U.S. Department of Labor created the Women in Industry Service to address women's tabor issues and to bring governmental attention to the rights of female workers. This was the predecessor agency to the U.S. Department of Labor Women's Bureau. 1920 • The U.S. Department of Labor Women's Bureau was founded to promote the welfare of wage-earning women. 1938 • The Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) was enacted to improve labor conditions and practices for workers by regulating minimum wage, overtime pay, record- keeping, and other labor standards. 1945 • The Women's Equality Bill, the first federal pay equity legislation, was introduced by AAUW member Rep. Chase Going Woodhouse (D -CT). 1961 • President Kennedy established the first national Commission on the Status of Women to address women's equality, which soon after issued a report detailing employment discrimination against working women, helping lead to the later passage of the Equal Pay Act. 1963 • The Equal Pay Act became law, requiring employers to provide employees equal pay for equal work regardless of sex. 1964 • Title VII of the Civil Rights Act was passed, barring employment discrimination on the basis of race, color, religion, sex, or national origin in employment practices and conditions of employment, including hiring, firing, promotion, and compensation. AAUW • www.aauw.org A -aa. 1967 • The Age Discrimination in Employment Act became law, protecting workers 40 years and older. 1972 • Title IX of the Education Amendments, the first comprehensive federal law to prohibit sex discrimination in education, was enacted. 1990 • Title I of the Americans with Disabilities Act was passed to protect against discrimination based on disability status, including in employment. 1993 • The Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA) was signed into law by President Clinton, providing unpaid protected leave for employees in need of time off for family and medical related issues. 1994 • The Fair Pay Act, which addresses unequal pay between female -dominated jobs equivalent to male -dominated jobs, was first introduced. The legislation would take steps to protect employees who discuss their pay and require employers to preserve wage - related data for submission to the EEOC. As of the 115th Congress, the bill has yet to pass. 1997 • The Paycheck Fairness Act, an update to the Equal Pay Act of 1963, was first introduced. The current bill would close loopholes, strengthen remedies to prevent pay discrimination, ban the use of prior salary history, prohibit retaliation against workers who discuss, disclose, or inquire about their wages, and direct the EEOC to collect wage related data. Every year since 1997 the legislation has been reintroduced, even passing the House in 2009 before falling short in the Senate. As of the 115th Congress, the bill has yet to pass. AAUW • www.aauw.org 2008 • The Americans with Disabilities Amendments Act (ADAAA) was passed to update and strengthen the ADA of 1990. The law made a number of significant changes to the definition of "disability" under the ADA and addressed problematic court decisions that had made the ADA weaker over time. 2009 • The Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act was enacted to address the unfortunate Supreme Court case, Ledbetter v. Goodyear, which sided with Ledbetter's employer in her pay discrimination case, overturning 40 years of precedent in discrimination cases. The law clarifies that pay discrimination can occur when a pay decision is made, when an employee is subject to that decision, or at any time that an employee is injured by the decision. 2014 • President Barack Obama signed AAUW- supported executive orders to increase pay protections for women. The provisions directed the federal government to collect more wage data and prohibited federal contractors from retaliating against their workers for discussing, disclosing, or inquiring about their wages. 2016 1 The Pay Equity for All Act, which would prohibit the use of prior salary history before making a job offer, was first introduced. As of the 115th Congress, the bill has yet to pass. 2017 • President Donald Trump halted implementation of the EEOC's pay data collection tool, which would have helped to better identify trends in pay disparities based on gender, race, and ethnicity. THE SIMPLE TRUTH ABOUT THE GENDER PAY GAP 1 Fall 2018 Edition a3 State As AAUW continues to press for additional federal equal pay protections, states are moving forward with laws to ensure that women receive pay equity. Currently, nearly every state has a law prohibiting employers from paying workers differently based solely on their sex. But many of these laws are limited in scope or are not enforced. Every state has room to make its pay equity laws stronger. The states with no protections against pay discrimination tend to have the biggest pay gaps. However, states with stronger laws do not FIGURE 11: Map of States with Equal Pay Provisions, 2018 *HI State Equal Pay Laws, by Strength Source: AAUW None Weak Moderate Strong necessarily have the smallest gaps. Strong pay equity laws help close the pay gap, but, as discussed above, the gap itself is affected by other issues, such as occupational segregation, access to paid leave, and discrimination. State laws addressing the pay gap vary considerably. For example, each state's laws apply to different subsets of employees: Some state laws cover all employees, others affect only public or only private employees, and still others regulate only employers who have more than a certain number of workers. Currently, two states—Alabama and Mississippi— have no state pay equity or sex -based employment discrimination regulations. All other states have at least some basic equal pay protections. But roughly one-third of states also have major loopholes in those protections that allow employers to continue to pay women less than men. For example, Louisiana's equal pay protections apply only to public employers, which generally have a more transparent pay structure than do private employers. This leaves a major hole in the state's otherwise relatively comprehensive equal pay legal structure. Several states do not prohibit employers from retaliating against employees who take legal action to remedy wage discrimination, making it risky for women to come forward. On the positive side, a handful of states have particularly robust laws governing equal pay. For example, THE SIMPLE TRUTH ABOUT THE GENDER PAY GAP 1 Fall 2018 Edition California limits the excuses employers can use to pay women less than men to only a "bona fide factor other than gender;' such as education, training, or experience (as opposed to reasons based solely on gender stereotypes). Maryland prohibits employers from withholding information about promotions or assigning or directing employees into less -favorable career tracks—known as "mommy tracking." Massachusetts, as well as a growing number of other states and cities, prohibits employers from using the prior salary history of potential employees to set their future wages. Tennessee subjects employers who violate the law to substantial fines and damage payments, emphasizing the seriousness of a violation. New Jersey requires all employers entering into a contract with the state to file a report with information about employee wages and hours categorized by gender, race, ethnicity, and job. AAUW advocates that all states pass—and enforce— equal pay laws, as well as develop innovative ways to chip away at the gap. We continue to push for federal pay equity legislation, regulation, and enforcement to protect employees and assist employers. AAUW also educates the public about this persistent problem and its effect on working families. These efforts are critical as we work to close the gender pay gap. AAUW • www.aauw.org WHAT SHOULD I DO IF I EXPERIENCE PAY DISCRIMINATION AT WORK? Both the Equal Pay Act of 1963 and Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 prohibit sex -based pay discrimination. Title VII and other federal statutes protect against pay discrimination on other bases as well. There also may be state laws that provide additional protection. If you feel you may be a victim of pay discrimination, these basic steps can help you get started. AAUW has additional resources available at bit.ly/MyRightsAtWork. 1. Put it in writing. Record the discriminatory pay 4. practices you believe are taking place. Keep copies of your salary records, pay stubs, and any other wage -related information. 2. Do your homework. For more information on your rights, call the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity 5. Commission (EEOC) hotline at 800.669.4000. Even if you aren't ready to file a discrimination charge, you can speak with an EEOC counselor about your legal rights. Also, find out whether your state has an equal pay law and check out which provisions are included at www.aauw.org/ resource/state-equal-pay-laws. 3. Seek help. Check your employee handbook. Your company may have an equal employment officer or human resources representative who can help you understand the internal grievance procedure, file an internal complaint, or access other tools to resolve problems, if you feel comfortable. Get legal advice. Consider speaking with an attorney who has specific experience with sex discrimination in the workplace. Learn more about your options at www.aauw.org/what-we-do/legal- resources/legal-referral-network. Act quickly. Depending on the path you pursue, there may be a time limit involved. State laws, Title VII, and the Equal Pay Act may all have different time limits involved in filing a claim. Learn more at www.eeoc.gov. 6. Find a support network. Discrimination at work is a difficult thing to face alone and the process of fighting discrimination can be very stressful. Seek support from friends and family. 7. Prepare fora long haul. Filing a discrimination lawsuit is a lengthy process, but others have succeeded in fighting discrimination, and you can too. Continue to do good job at work and keep a record of what you're working on. Make copies of your job evaluations and any letters or memos that show you are performing well, and keep them at home. AAUW • www.aauw.org THE SIMPLE TRUTH ABOUT THE GENDER PAY GAP 1 Fall 2018 Edition TAKE ACTION WITH AAUW • For the latest information on the status of pay equity legislation, federal policies, and actions that you can take to narrow the pay gap, visit fightforfairpay.org. • Visit satary.aauw.org to find out how to attend a Start Smart or Work Smart salary negotiation workshop or bring one to your community. • Join AAUW's Action Network to keep up with equal pay advocacy and to receive notices to tell your legislators what you think at bit.ly/aauw-action. • Learn about your rights at work and what you can do if you believe you're being paid unfairly or otherwise discriminated against at bit.ly/MyRightsAtWork. • Learn about the status of pay equity laws in your state and take action at www.aauw.org/ resource/state-equal-pay-laws. •Get the facts on current issues facing women at www.aauw.org/what-we-do/research. • Join AAUW and help secure pay equity for all at www.aauw.org/join. THE SIMPLE TRUTH ABOUT THE GENDER PAY GAP 1 Fall 2018 Edition AAUW • www.aauw.org BIBLIOGRAPHY AAUW. (2012). Graduating to a pay gap: The earnings of women and men one year after college graduation, by C. Corbett and C. Hill. Washington, DC: Author. AAUW. (2016). Barriers and bias: The status of women in leadership, by C. Hill, K. Miller, K. Benson, & G. Handley. Washington, DC: Author. AAUW. (2018a). Deeper in debt: Women and student loans, by K. Miller (2018 update). Washington, DC: Author. AAUW. (2018b). Broken ladders: Barriers to women's representation in nonprofit leadership, by K. Miller and D. Vagins. Washington, DC: Author. AAUW Educational Foundation. (2007). Behind the pay gap, by J. G. Dey Er C. Hill. Washington, DC: Author. Babcock, L., & Laschever, S. (2008). Ask for it: How women can use the power of negotiation to get what they really want. New York: Bantam Dell. Bertrand, M., Goldin, C., & Katz, L. F. (2010). Dynamics of the gender gap for young professionals in the financial and corporate sectors. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 2, 228-55. Blau, F. D., & Kahn, L. M. (2017). The gender wage gap: Extent, trends, and explanations. IZA Discussion Paper Series. Journal of Economic Literature 2017 55(3) 789- 865, 9656. Bonn, Germany: Institute for the Study of Labor. https://pubs.aeaweb.org/doi/pdfplus/10.1257/ jel.20160995http://ftp.iza.org/dp9656.pdf. Bowles, H. R., & Babcock, L. (2013). How can women escape the compensation negotiation dilemma? Relational accounts are one answer. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 37(1), 80-96. Budig, M. J. (2014). The fatherhood bonus and the motherhood penalty: Parenthood and the gender gap in pay. Washington, DC: Third Way. content. thirdway.org/publications/853/NEXT_-_Fatherhood_ Motherhood.pdf. Carnevale, A. P., Smith, N., Er Gulish, A. (2018). Women Can't Win. Washington: Georgetown University Center on Education and the Workforce. Carter, N. M., Er Silva, C. (2011). The myth of the ideal worker: Does doing all the right things really get women ahead? Catalyst. www.catalyst.org/system/ fi les/The_Myth_of_the_Ideal_Worker_Does_Doing_ All_the_Right_Things_Really_Get_Women_Ahead.pdf. Center for American Progress and Movement Advancement Project. (2015). Paying an Unfair Price: The Financial Penalty for Being Transgender in America. Denver: Movement Advancement Project. Child Care Aware of America. (2017). Parents and the High Cost of Child Care. Arlington: Child Care Aware of America. Cohen-Charash, Y., Er Spector, P. E. (2001). The role of justice in organizations: A meta-analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 86, 278-321. Colquitt, J. A., Conlon, D. E., Wesson, M. J., Porter, C. 0., & Ng, K. Y. (2001). Justice at the millennium: A meta -analytic review of 25 years of organizational justice research. Journal of Applied Psychology 86, 425-45. Correll, S. J., Er Benard, S. (2007). Getting a job: Is there a motherhood penalty? American Journal of Sociology 112(5): 1297-1338. Fischer, J., & Hayes, J. (2013). The importance of Social Security in the incomes of older Americans: Differences by gender, age, race/ethnicity, and marital status. Washington, DC: Institute for Women's Policy Research. Fontenot, K., Semega, J., & Kollar, M. (2018). Income and Poverty in the United States: 2017. Washington: U.S. Census Bureau. Glassdoor. (2016). Global Salary Transparency Survey: Employee Perceptions of Talking Pay. Mill Valley: Glassdoor. Glauber, R. (2008). Race and gender in families and at work: The fatherhood wage. Gender and Society 22(1): 8-30. AAUW • www.aauw.org THE SIMPLE TRUTH ABOUT THE GENDER PAY GAP I Fall 2018 Edition Glynn, S. J. (2016). Breadwinning mothers are increasingly the U.S. norm. Washington, DC: Center for American Progress. www.americanprogress.org/issues/ women/reports/2016/12/19/295203/breadwinning- mothers-are-increasingly-the-u-s-norm. Goldin, C. (2014). A grand gender convergence: Its last chapter. American Economic Review 104(4): 1091- 119. scholar.harvard.edu/files/goldin/files/goldin_ aeapress_2014_1.pdf. Grant, J. M., Mottet, L. A., Er Tanis, J. (2011). Injustice at every turn: A report of the National Transgender Discrimination Survey. National Transgender Discrimination Survey www.thetaskforce.org/static_ html/downloads/reports/reports/ntds_full.pdf. Hartmann, H., Hayes, J., Er Clark, J. (2014). How equal pay for working women would reduce poverty and grow the American economy. Washington, DC: Institute for Women's Policy Research. Hegewisch, A., Er Hartmann, H. (2014). Occupational segregation and the gender wage gap: Ajob half done. Washington, DC: Institute for Women's Policy Research. Institute for Women's Policy Research. (2011). Pay secrecy and wage discrimination. IWPR Fact Sheet. iwpr.org/publications/pay-secrecy-and-wage- discrimination. Jee, E., Misra, J., Er Murray -Close, M. (2018). Motherhood penalties in the U.S., 1986-2014. Washington: Washington Center for Equitable Growth. Jagsi, R., Griffith, K. A., Stewart, A., Sambuco, D., DeCastro, R., Er Ubel, P. A. (2012). Gender differences in the salaries of physician researchers. Journal of the American Medical Association 307(22): 2410-17. Killewald, A. (2013). A reconsideration of the fatherhood premium: Marriage, coresidence, biology, and fathers' wages. American Sociological Review 78(1): 96-116. Kim, H. (2009). Integrating organizational justice into the relationship management theory. (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from All Academic Research. THE SIMPLE TRUTH ABOUT THE GENDER PAY GAP 1 Fall 2018 Edition Kricheli-Katz, T. (2012). Choice, discrimination, and the motherhood penalty. Law and Society Review 46(3): 557-87. Legislative Office on the Economic Status of Women (2016). Pay equity: The Minnesota experience. Table: Average salaries in state government employment by year, 1976-2014. www.oesw.leg.mn/PDFdocs/Pay_ Equity_Report2016.pdf. Levanon, A., England, P., & Allison, P. (2009). Occupational feminization and pay: Assessing causal dynamics using 1950-2000 U.S. Census data. Social Forces 88(2): 865-91. sf.oxfordjournals.org/ content/88/2/865.short. Milli, J., Huang, Y., Hartmann, H., Er Hayes, J. (2017). The Impact of Equal Pay on Poverty and the Economy. Washington: Institute for Women's Policy Research. Minnesota Management and Budget. (n.d.). Local government pay equity. https://mn.gov/mmb/ employee-relations/compensation/laws/local-gov/ local-gov-pay-equity. Mize, T. D. (2016). Sexual Orientation in the Labor Market. American Sociological Review, 1132-1160. National Partnership for Women and Families. (2018). Asian American and Pacific Islander Women and the Wage Gap. Washington: National Partnership for Women and Families. National Women's Law Center. (2018). Motherhood Wage Gap for Mothers Overall: 2016 State Rankings. Retrieved from National Women's Law Center: https:// nwlc-ciw49tixgw5lbab.stackpathdns.com/wp- content/uploads/2017/05/Motherhood-Wage-Gap- Overall-Table.pdf Paul, M., Hamilton, D., Er Darity, W. J. (2018). Discriminatory penalties at the intersection of race and gender in the United States. Retrieved August 13, 2018, from https://equitablegrowth.org/discriminatory- penalties-at-the-intersection-of-race-and-gender-in- the-united-states/ AAUW • www.aauw.org P -Ag PayScale. (2017). New PayScale study reveals employees' perceptions about pay fairness and transparency are five times more impactful on engagement than actual compensation. Retrieved August 13, 2018, from https://www.payscale.com/about/press-releases/ new-payscale-study-reveals-employees-perceptions- pay-fairness-transparency-five-times-impactful- engagement-actual-compensation Raub, A., Nandi, A., Earle, A., De Guzman Chorny, N., Wong, E., Chung, P., Heymann, J. (2018). Paid Parental Leave: A Detailed Look at Approaches Across OECD Countries. Los Angeles: WORLD Policy Analysis Center. Schecter, A., Alba, M., & Schone, M. (2013). More disabled workers paid just pennies an hour. Retrieved August 2018, from https://www.nbcnews.com/news/ investigations/more-disabled-workers-paid-just- pennies-hour-v19916979 Schilt, K. (2011). Just one of the guys? Transgender men and the persistence of gender inequality. Chicago: University of Chicago. U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2017). Employee Benefits Survey, Leave benefits: Access. https://www. bls.gov/ncs/ebs/benefits/2017/ownership/civilian/ table32a.htm U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2018a). Current population survey annual average data tables. Table 37. www.bts.gov/cps/cpsaat37.htm. U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2018b). Usual weekly earnings of wage and salary workers, fourth quarter 2017. Economic News Release USDL-18-0079. https:// www.bls.gov/news.release/pdf/wkyeng.pdf. U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2018c). Highlights of women's earnings in 2017. Retrieved from https:// www.bls.gov/opub/reports/womens-earnings/2017/ U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2018d). Current population survey annual average data tables. Table 2. www.bls.gov/cps/cpsaat02.htm. U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2018e). Current population survey annual average data tables. Table 39. www.bls.gov/cps/cpsaat39.htm. U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2018f). Economic News Release, Employment Characteristics of Families News Release. Retrieved from https://www.bls.gov/news. release/famee.htm U.S. Census Bureau. (2014). Disability. www.census. gov/people/disability/methodology/acs.htrnl. U.S. Census Bureau. (2016). Fact sheet: Differences between the American Community Survey (ACS) and the Annual Social and Economic Supplement to the Current Population Survey (CPS ASEC). www.census. gov/topics/income-poverty/poverty/guidance/data- sou rces/acs-vs-cps.html. U.S. Census Bureau (2018a). American community survey 1 -year estimates. Data tables available from American FactFinder, factfinder.census.gov. U.S. Census Bureau. (2018b). Current population survey: Annual social and economic supplements. Table P-38. www.census.gov/data/tables/time-series/ demo/income-poverty/historical-income-people.html. U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics. (2015). Baccalaureate and beyond longitudinal study 2008/12. Data analysis system available from nces. ed.gov/datalab. U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics. (2016a). nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d16/tables/ dt16_104.10.asp. U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics. (2016b). Table 322.20. Bachelor's degrees conferred by postsecondary institutions, by race/ethnicity and sex of student: Selected years, 1976-77 through 2014-15. nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d16/tables/ dt16_322.20.asp. AAUW • www.aauw.org THE SIMPLE TRUTH ABOUT THE GENDER PAY GAP 1 Fall 2018 Edition U.S. Department of Justice. (2015). Justice Department Reaches Proposed ADA Settlement Agreement On Oregon's Developmental Disabilities System. https:// www.justice.gov/opa/pr/justice-department-reaches- proposed-ada-settlement-agreement-oregons- developmental U.S. Department of Labor. (2018). Wage and Hour Division (WHD), Community Rehabilitation Programs (CRPs) List. https://www.dol.gov/whd/ specialemployment/CRPlist.htm U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. (2018a). What You Should Know About EEOC and the Enforcement Protections for LGBT Workers. Retrieved from https://www.eeoc.gov/eeoc/newsroom/wysk/ enforcement_protections_lgbt_workers.cfm U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. (2018b). Enforcement and Litigation Statistics. https:// www.eeoc.gov/eeoc/statistics/enforcement/. THE SIMPLE TRUTH ABOUT THE GENDER PAY GAP 1 Fall 2018 Edition U.S. Office of Personnel Management. (2014). Government wide strategy on advancing pay equality in the federal government. www.opm.gov/policy- data-oversight/pay-leave/reference-materials/reports/ governmentwide-strategy-on-advancing-pay-equality- in-the-federal-government.pdf. U.S. Office of Personnel Management. (2016). Pay and leave salaries and wages. www.opm.gov/policy-data- oversight/pay-leave/salaries-wages. Williams Institute. (2015). The impact of wage equality on sexual orientation poverty gaps. williamsinstitute.law.ucla. edu/wp-content/uploads/Impact-of-Wage-Equality-on- Sexual-Orientation-Poverty-Gaps-June-2015.pdf. Williams Institute. (2016). How many adults identify as transgender in the United States? williamsinstitute. law.ucla.ed u/wp-content/uploads/How-Many-Ad u lts- Identify-as-Transgender-in-the-United-States.pdf. Zarya, Valentina. (2016). Salesforce spent $3 million on equal pay—here's how many employees got raises as a result. Fortune. fortune.com/2016/03/08/ salesforce -equal -pay. AAUW • www.aauw.org Active Adult Communities] 'B1 UIDL I Ex 9:00 Brought to you by Hildmh 282N AM PM Intergenerational Center 1590 Oslo Road, SW Vero Beach 32962 verobeach4laa‘ uwnei • 75?1V4,0° r "t6.3 • The event is free but please register at verobeach-fLaautcnet/fundrafsers • "Pt tkr4 Senior Apartments 1 Independent' [jiving Congregate 1 Group Horne Assisted Living Memory Care NiiriFdiity Continuing Cori Retirement Cornmunity ICCRCJ Reholyiltation Level of Care Premier Sponsor Indian Rivcr Mr/1km! Crater 4, gigGladlitri0 information Presentations Demonstrations nior Ex Sponsored by Brought to you by ri Cleveland Clinic Indian River Hospital FLORIDA EYE INSTITUTE LIFE IS LOOKING BETTER ALREADY 772-569-9500 1 fleye.com Encompass Health Rehabilitation Hospital of Treasure Coast • • •• • • • Senior Resource Association RENAISSANCE SENIOR WING of VERO BEACH AAU1/49 Florida ISION EYE CENTER 0 SENIORS Helping SENIORS° ...a way to give and to receive ctva HOME HEALTH 4 A VNA fFREMICAte, r\� Pelican Landing Assisted Living and Memory Care TrikyHome Healthcare i1 ClearCaptions� Vendor Booths Exit to Presentation Room 48 47 48 49 50 61 0 L Exit to Courtyard 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 12 13 17 18 19 23 24 28 29 30 34 35 9 10 11 14 15 18 20 21 22 26 28 27 31 32 33 38 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 AAU19) empowering women since 1881 Our Mission To advance gender equity for women and girls through research, education and advocacy. Locally, we support scholarships, grants and programs for women and girls in Indian River County and advocate for women's rights VeroBeach-fl. aauw. net io Like us on: facebooko @AAUWVero Beach Brought to you by Intergenerational Center 1590 Oslo Road, SW. Vero Beach 32962 verobeach-R.aauw.net OSLO ROAD Vendors by Booth Number Presentations 1 Treasure Coast Community Health Screenings: Dental. and Blood Sugar 2 Soter. Senior Living and Family Advocates 3 Schlitt Services 4 The Beet -nifty Vero Beach 5 Future Care Genetics Hereditary Cancer, and Pharmacogenetic Tests 6* VNA Of the Treasure Coast • Screening: Blood Pressure 7 Raymond James.Financial 8 Law Offices of Jennifer D. Peshke, P.A. 9 Comfort Keepers 10* Freedom Health 11 Senior Resource Association 12 211 Helpline Treasure Coast 13* Seniors Helping Seniors 14 Friends After Diagnosis 15 Coastal Concierge Services 16* Pelican. Landing Screening: Memory 17* Cleveland Clinic Indian River Hospital° 18* Encompass Health 19* Health First 20 AAUW Vero Beach 21* Clear Captions 22 Vero. Beach.Theatre Guild 23 United Health Care 24 Amore. Travel 25 Cbx-Giffard- Seawinds *Sponsors: Premier/Platinum, Silver, - and Bronze 26 The Old Voices 27 Your Aging and Disability Resource Center 28 Rooney & Rooney, P.A. 29 30* Activa Home Health 31* Renaissance Senior Living 32 Grace Rehab of Vero Beach 33 Care. Patrol of the Treasure Coast 34 TC Prosthetic & Orthotic Services 35 Veterans Council of IR County 36 White Glove Moving and Storage 37 Florida Baptist Retirement Center 38 Indian River Publishers 39* Florida Eye Institute Screenings: Vision and Glaucoma 40 UBS Financial Services 41 Deaf and Hard -of -Hearing Services 42 Tree of Life for Healing and Wellness Screenigs: Depression and Anxiety 43 Home Instead 44 VOXX Life 45 Judith. of Vero 46 Green Gables. Assisted Living 47 Aizheirner.& Parkinson Association 48 Nightingale- Private Care 49. Fielders lnstitute.for Lifelong Learning 50 Griffin. Chiropractic Care. 51* Trilogy Home Healthcare Please go to Presentation Rooms 112A&B 9:45 Hospice. Myths vs. AM Facts Filling' in the Holes about Hospice Angela Bingaman, VNA of the Treasure Coast 10:30 Diabetes and Eye Care Dr. Thomas Baudo, Florida Eye Institute 11:15 Advanced Treatment for Stroke Dr. Akram Shhadeh, Interventional Neurology, Cleveland Clinic Indian River Hospital 12 Skin Cancer Prevention Noon & Treatment Options Dr. Lilia Correa -Seim, Dermatologist and. MORS Surgeon, Scully -Welsh Cancer Center 5,C, PROCLAMATION DESIGNATING MARCH 30, 2019 AS INDIAN RIVER STEAM FEST DAY WHEREAS, the citizens of Indian River County see the benefit of educating children in the areas of Science, Technology, Engineering, Art, and Math (STEAM); and WHEREAS, STEM fields are important to the economy and general well-being of our community because they are the underpinning of manufacturing, food production, and health care; and WHEREAS, artists, designers, and writers provide new insights and perspectives that can sow the seeds of scientific progress; and WHEREAS, between 2017 and 2027, the number of STEM jobs will grow 13 percent, compared to 9 percent for non -STEM jobs; and WHEREAS, we need creative people to form productive collaborations with scientists, educators, and technologists to make a positive impact on the world; and WHEREAS, Indian River County is committed to investing in the education of all young people by providing expanded learning opportunities in the fields of Science, Technology, Engineering, Art, and Math; and WHEREAS, Indian River STEAM Fest Day will be commemorated in Indian River County, Florida on March 30, 2019. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT PROCLAIMED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA that March 30, 2019 be designated as Indian River STEAM Fest Day in Indian River County. Adopted this 26th day of March, 2019. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA Bob Solari, Chairman Susan Adams, Vice Chairman Joseph E. Flescher Peter D. O'Bryan Tim Zorc 4 Informational Item Office of the INDIAN RIVER COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR Jason E. Brown, County Administrator Michael C. Zito, Assistant County Administrator MEMORANDUM TO: Members of the Board of County Commissioners FROM: Jason E. Brown County Administrator DATE: March 15, 2019 SUBJECT: Non -Binding Memorandum of Understanding for Research, Education and Training, Florida Atlantic University Board of Trustees Last year the Harbor Branch Oceanographic Institute (HBOI) Foundation provided a grant to establish the Florida Center for Coastal and Human Health for the purpose of addressing the Health of Florida Coastal Ecosystems and Communities. Dr. James M. Sullivan, Executive Director, Florida Atlantic University (FAU) — HBOI, was in touch with Indian River County (IRC) Staff last fall as we dealt with the red tide issue. During our communications, Dr. Sullivan offered Indian River County the opportunity to become a stakeholder in the FAU-HBOI Harmful Algal Bloom (HAB) Center. It is the intent of FAU-HBOI to actively work toward education and engagement of the public on research results and work being undertaken to fill a critical need for understanding the significant health threats associated with environmental changes on the Indian River Lagoon ecosystem. Toward that end, I have executed a Non -Binding Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) for Research, Education,• and Training with the FAU Board of Trustees. No funding is required to participate, but IRC is committing staff collaboration in research, educational, and training projects. Should any future joint projects be proposed which would require funding participation, a separate contract would be necessary and would be brought to the Board for consideration and authorization. For your information, please find attached the Executive Summary of the FAU-HBOI Florida Center for Coastal and Human Health. Also attached is the MOU which specifies the Objectives and Activities in which IRC will participate. Attachments: Executive Summary Non -Binding Memorandum of Understanding 5 '7 A HARBOR BRANCH FLORIDA ATLANTIC UNIVERSITY' Ocean Sc ence for o Better wow The Florida Center for Coastal and Hannan Health; Addressing the Health of Florida Coastal Ecosystems and Communities. This Center is made possible by an initial grant of $650Kfronr the Harbor Branch Oceanot,rap/ric Institute Foundation and officially started research operations August 1, 2018 Executive Summary The effects of both environmental and anthropogenic change are evident in Florida coastal waters, where warming temperatures, nutrient eutrophication, sea level rise, changing precipitation patterns and so called "tropicalization" are creating documented ecological shifts. The Florida coastal region that is the focus of the proposed Center's research is the Indian River. Lagoon (IRL) ecosystem and associated watersheds (including Lake Okeechobee), where ecological shifts have already begun to negatively affect the ecosystem, communities and human health through exposure to an increasing number of harmful algal bloom (HAB) events and suites of toxins. The IRL ecosystem is likely one of the most HAB impacted estuaries in the United States in terms of diversity of HAB species, number and extent of blooms, and resultant range of toxins that may ultimately affect the humans that live and work in the region. Understanding the connections between a changing environment and 'HABs, and resultant human health issues is the central mission of the proposed Center. The specific aims of the Center during its first year of funding are: I. Assess HAB dynamics in the IRL ecosystem and associated environmental drivers using direct sampling and remote sensing. 2. Develop advanced genomics methods to define the drivers of HAB community dynamics and toxin production. 3. Use sentinel species and human epidemiology studies (and hospitalization data) to define mechanisms and the extent of trophic uptake of HAB toxins in bosh wildlife and humans. 4. Identify metabolites/toxicity in samples collected by the research projects that may represent a threat to human health or that are predictive of HAB community structure and toxin production. 5. Disseminate the results of the Center through both stakeholder meetings and the creation of a display at the HBOI Ocean Discovery Visitor Center that conveys to the public the mission and results of the Center. Center Summary: The proposed, highly integrated Center will fill a critical need for understanding the significant health threats associated with environmental changes in the IRL ecosystem, and how these threats will be affected by climate change and anthropogenic changes HARBOP BPA//CF-1 OCEANOGRAPHIC INSTITUTE 5600 US 1 North Fort Pierce, Ft. 34946 tel: 772-242-2400 Ocean Science for a Better World www.fau.edu/hboi An Equal ©pporturiity/ Equ4l P,ccess fr6titution HARBOR BRANCH FLORIDA ATLANTIC UNIVERSITY' Ocean Science We Setter world' (e.g. nutrient pollution) in the system. A primary focus will be on HABs, but other factors (viruses, pathogenic bacteria, influx of deleterious chemicals) will be incorporated into the Center's mission over time. The major products of the Center will include an in-depth characterization of HAB ecology in the IRL system (e.g. distributions, physiology, environmental drivers, taxonomy with metagenomics, toxicity), the refinement of an ecosystem level model to predict the effects of environmental change on the occurrence, distributions and transport of HABs in the IRL ecosystem, a better understanding of the functional microbial landscape of the IRL, and how this landscape changes in relation to HAB ecological dynamics, as well as a better understanding of functional genetic components responsible for toxin regulation and biosynthesis, a new understanding of HAB toxin trophic transfer in important components of the IRL aquatic food web (i.e. indicator species) and lastly, epidemiological studies on the direct exposure of regional human populations to HAB toxins. The Center will actively seek to educate and engage the public on Center results and work with numerous state and local stakeholders to fill a major scientific need required to protect the health and safety of the region's population. For more information please contact: James M. Sullivan. Ph.D. Executive Director Florida Atlantic University - Harbor Branch Oceanographic Institute 5600 U.S I North, Fort Pierce, FL 34946 email: isullivan@fau.edu, office: 772-242-2445, cell: 401-290-7156 website: http:!/fau.edu/hboi/about/admin ops.php HARBORBPANCH OCEANOGRAPHIC (NSTfUTE 5600 US 1 North Fort Pierce, FL 34946 tel: 772-242-2400 Ocean Science for a Better World www.fau.edu/hboi An Eauol Opportunity/ Equal Access In7;itution NON-BINDING MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING For RESEARCH, EDUCATION, and TRAINING Between INDIAN RIVER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS And FLORIDA ATLANTIC UNIVERSITY BOARD OF TRUSTEES IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have executed this non-binding Memorandum of Understanding as of Ihe. day and year of the tast signature indicated below, 'Indian River County Board of:County Commissioners Florida Atlaodc . �8om�ofTruutecx By Date: March Ei2010 8 INTRODUCTION WHEREAS, Indian River County c, IRC ") has developed expertise in Coastal, Lagoon, ana Environmental Protection And is interested in developing partnerships with academic institutions for the purpose of research, education and training; and WHEREAS, Florida Atlantic University (FAU) is an educational and research institution with mutual interests to IRC ; and WHEREAS, this Memorandum of Understanding ('MOU") will establish a mechanism for the Parties to plan cooperative research and educational activities; and WHEREAS, each Party to this MOU recognizes the unique expertise of the other; and NOW THEREFORE, the undersigned Parties agree as follows: I. AUTHORITIES The Parties represent that they are each authorized under the laws of the State of Florida to enter into an MOU where such MOU promotes its objectives and mission. II. OBJECTIVES The objectives of this MOU are: To allow the Parties to plan collaborate},ie research, educational, and training activities of mutual interest. Where appropriate and as mutually agreed upon, to jointly seek sources of external support to fund these planned collaborative efforts. To make available to thepublic, other researchers and faculty those facts, methods and new findings that are discovered through that research, and to share specialized scientific equipment, physical facilities and support services in ways that will expand and provide more cost effective research and education for the Parties. 2 9 III. ACTIVITIES In furtherance of the above objectives, the Parties agree that each will do the following: Appoint a Coordinator to assist in developing and planning collaborative research, educational, and training projects. Each party will identify the name and contact information for its Coordinator, 2. Continue to provide salaries, benefits, and travel costs of employees during such time as they are involved in planning collaborative activities in accordance with its standard policies and as budgetary considerations permit. As specific collaborative research, educational and training activities are identified and the roles of each Party are agreed upon, those collaborative efforts will be reduced to writing as contracts and signed by the Parties. Any collaborative research agreements arising from this MOU will include, but not be limited to, provisions setting forth the approved budget, specific financial and administrative arrangements, a description of the scope of work to be performed, the rights to intellectual property arising from the collaborative research effort and the right to publish. This MOU does not necessarily anticipate any present exchange of monies between Parties or guarantee specific funding, Future joint projects will require a separate contract pursuant to paragraph 6 of Article III herein. IV. NONDISCRIMINATION IN EMPLOYMENT In connection with the performance of work under this MOU, the Parties agree not to discriminate against any employee, student, or applicant for employment because of sex, race, religion, color, handicap. or national origin. V. AMENDMENTS AND REVIEW The terms of this MOU may be amended only by written mutual agreement, effective when signed by the Parties. VI. TERM AND TERMINATION 3 10 This MOU shall be in effect and automatically renew annually unless any Party, at any time, provides written notice of its intent to withdraw from it, VII. NOTICE Any notice required to be given under this MOU shall be in writing and deemed to have been given at the earlier of when actually received if delivered by hand or by telecopy or, if sent by mail to the party's address given below, five (5) days after mailing. A party may change the address for notice purposes by sending a notice of change of address in conformity with this paragraph. Notice to IRC Indian River County Administrator I$01 lith Street, Building A Fero Reach, }=I, 32i9(i0- 3358 Notice to FAU: FAU 777 Glades Road Boca Ratori, FL 33431 .Attn: Vice President of Research VIII. USE OF NAME The Parties agree not to use each others names in any advertising or other form of publicity without the prior written consent of that Party. However, the Parties agree in advance that each may use the name of the other in announcing this MOU. IX. This MOU shall be construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Florida. 11 March 26, 2019 INFORMATIONAL ITEMS INDIAN RIVER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS INTER -OFFICE MEMORANDUM To: Members of the Board of County Commissioners Date: March 19, 2019 Subject: BCC Appointee Vacancies on the Metropolitan Planning Organization Citizen Advisory Committee (MPO CAC) From: Tina Cournoyer, Commissioner Assistant This is notification that the MPO CAC has vacancies for two BCC Appointee positions. Meetings are held on the first Tuesday of each month at 2:00 p.m. in County Administration Building "B", 1800 27th Street, Vero Beach, Florida. Anyone interested in serving on the MPO CAC will need to submit an application and resume to the Board of County Commissioners Office, County Administration Building A., 1801 27th Street, Vero Beach, FL 32960. Applications can be accessed on-line at http://www.ircgov.com/Boards/Committee Application.pdf or at the Board of County Commissioner's Office. C:\Users\legistar\AppData\Local\Temp\BCL Technologies\easyPDF 8\@BCL@600E4292\@BCL@600E4292.doc12 • 1 PROCLAMATION HONORING SUZANNE C. MASTERS ON HER RETIREMENT FROM INDIAN RIVER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS DEPARTMENT OF GENERAL SERVICES, LIBRARY SERVICES DIVISION Suzanne C. Masters retires from Indian River County Library Services Division effective March 28, 2019; and WHEREAS, Suzanne C Masters began her career with Indian River County on November 3, 2001, as a Library Clerk. In May 2005 she was promoted to a Library Technical Assistant position until her next promotion in December 2012 to a Library Associate I, the position she held until her retirement. Suzanne served as Liaison to the Gifford Youth Achievement Center and was instrumental in providing Library Services to the children of the Gifford Community; and WHEREAS, Suzanne C Masters has served this County and the Public with distinction and selflessness. During her seventeen years of service, she was dedicated, and her work was greatly appreciated by her employer, citizens, and co-workers alike; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT PROCLAIMED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDL4N RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that the Board applauds Suzanne C. Masters efforts on behalf of the County, and the Board wishes to express their appreciation for the dedicated service she has given to Indian River County for the last seventeen years; and BE IT FURTHER PROCLAIMED that the Board of County Commissioners and staff extend heartfelt wishes for success in her future endeavors! Adopted this 26t1: day of March 2019. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS INDLANRIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA Bob Solari, Chairman rs j A vkll PROCLAMA TION HONORING JOSEPHSTEPHENS ON HIS RETIREMENT FROM INDL4NRIVER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS/TRAFFIC ENGINEERING DIVISION WHEREAS, Joseph Stephens retires from Indian River County Traffic Engineering Division effective March 28, 2019; and WHEREAS, Joseph Stephens began his career with Indian River County on June 16, 1995, as a Maintenance Worker I for Parks Division, and on April 19, 1996, he received a promotion to Maintenance Worker V for Traffic Engineering Division. On October 29, 1999, Joseph Stephens received a promotion to Marking Technician for Traffic Engineering Division, where he continued in that capacity until his retirement; and WHEREAS, Joseph Stephens has served this County and the Public with distinction and selflessness. During his twenty-four years of service, he was dedicated, and his work was greatly appreciated by the employer, citizens, and co-workers alike; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT PROCLAIMED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that the Board applauds Joseph Stephens's efforts on behalf of the County, and the Board wishes to express their appreciation for the dedicated service he has given to Indian River County for the last twenty fouryears; and BE IT FURTHER PROCLAIMED that the Board of County Commissioners and staff extend heartfelt wishes for success in his future endeavors! Adopted this 26th day of March, 2019. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA Bob Solari, Chairman _�� -1` 7E PROCLAMA TION HONORING MICHAEL FEATHERS ON HIS RETIREMENT FROM INDIAN RIVER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS FACILITIES MANAGEMENT DIVISION WHEREAS, Michael Feathers retires from Indian River County Facilities Management Division effective April 4, 2019; and WHEREAS, Michael Feathers began his career with Indian River County on April 24, 1984 as a Tradesworker 1, and he served in this capacity until his retirement; and WHEREAS, Michael Feathers has served this County and the Public with distinction and selflessness. During his thirty-five years of service, he was dedicated, and his work was greatly appreciated by the employer, citizens, and co-workers alike; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT PROCLAIMED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that the Board applauds Michael Feathers' efforts on behalf of the County, and the Board wishes to express their appreciation for the dedicated service he has given to Indian River Countyfor the last thirty-five years; and BE IT FURTHER PROCLAIMED that the Board of County Commissioners and staff extend heartfelt wishes for success in his future endeavors! Adopted this 26th day of March, 2019. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS INDIANRIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA Bob Solari, Chairman 0 IntiZAW,..Z.Otb,i AVIS .1s. t..414.0%..-ftStMir51441 . CERTIFIED MAIL 7011 3490 0000 1075 7426 MOO 14,2019' The Honorable Bob'Solari Board Of County Commission Indian River:County 189.1 - 27.0 Street Vero. Beach, FL 3296.0 CE MAR .1 8 2019 80.4,P-00.Couvriz • COPi.t.A114$4011 RE: :Notice :of Public Heating Dept Commissioner ail: /. )3. .P.iitgtiant to. R . a'tenot6ink:youi. of ba in Inteto annex 12.655 acres,..more or less, known as Ro-Fd by merger with Ameiican Mutual Corp, Property; into the City of .Vellsmere... The first reading Of Ordinance 2019-03, will be held during our City..:Council Meeting on March tist, :2619; with: anticipated adoption: approval on. April 18;.:2919: 'EnCIOSed please..find.a..copy of Ordinance No: 2010703;,. the display advertisement along. With a'location $hOUld.-yOU. have: any ObeStions. recjiiire .anY :additional information please 'do • not- beSitatesto caU nie. sincqT9Ni. Nunernaker pityManager 3.RN/dC.k: 2 SQ thOrange Street Fellsrriere, Florida 32948-6700 Phone: 772-571-1616 Fax: 772-571-8615 .D-1§TRI3O ttw; LrT Administrator • Attorney .Cottliteudily D,v.. Enteri.:Setvicit ilumaniteourceis OAR . Pali( Worhs ALS Itecrentipe.. 111ilitierServiOs, Other bac_ 16 :NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING: FOR ANNEXATION The city°dna of: the City of :Fellsmere, Thdian River County, :Florida, will hold a Public Hearings on. April 40 and April 18th,2019 beginning at 7.:00p,m, in the City Council Chambers, 22 S Orange Street, Fellsmere; FL, to 'consider the adoption oren Ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE - NO. 2019-03 AN :ORDINANCE 'OF THE CITY. OF FELLSMERE, INDIAN :RIVER COUNTY/ FLORIDA, PROVIDING FOR VOLUNTARY ANNEXATION OF 12:.E55 ACRES MORE • OR LESS, LOCATED 'ON THE, SOUTH SIDE OF COUNTY ROAD 512 EAST OF INTERSTATE HIGHWAY NO 95, EAST OF THE RACETRAC SERVICE STATION AND WEST OF 106:TH AVENUE INTO THE CITY OF FELLSMERE; PROVIDING FOR RATIFICATION, PROVIDING FOR LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPERTY ANNEXED, PROVIDING FOR. REDEFINING THE BOUNDARY OF THE CITY LIMITS; PROVIDING FOR INTERIK LAND USE AND ZONING CLASSIFICATION, PROVioiNq, OF FILING WITH THE CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT, DEPARTMENT OF -STATE AND THE CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY; pROVOIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; PROVIDING FOR CONFLICTS. AND PPROVIDING FOR AN .EFFECTIVE DATE. "A portion :of verb i..a.kes'Otates,5ub4i.ViSibri, .blocks, A through D and abutting -..abandoned :road rights -Of -Way along 1060 :.Court and 107th Court and the .complete legal .cieStribtibri, by Metesand bounds and Ordinarite Can be :Obtained frorn the. Office. of fhe City 'Clerk". INSERT MAP Exhibit "A" here :Copies 'of:the proposed •.Ordinance and legal description: by .metes and tounds are availablefor review in the:.Office of the city"Ciptk.22 S. Orange Street, Fellsmere, 'Ft:between the hours Of8:30 a.rtiand 12 noon and 1100:P.M. to 5.::00 p m, Monday through Friday. The Theetihg It. Open to 'the. public and the Public, is invited to. attend and be heard With respect to the proposed Ordinance, public: Hearings .may be continued fromilmeto timet .Any person whomay•wish,to appeal any decision which may be made at this hearing will need to ensure that a verbatim record Of the proceedings is made; which record: includes the testimony and evidence upon, which the appeal: is to be based. Any person who may need -special accommodations for this meeting must contact the City Clerk's Office at (772):646-6301 at least. 48 hours ih advance of -the meeting. Cuaiquiere que desea apelar cualquier decision que se puede. ihacer ,en esta reunion, rieteitar*: tomar en ,q.ienta que un, regiStroel. pie de Ia 'tetra de los actOS se hacei que el registo intlUye .el: testinioniO y la evidencia SObre que Ia apelacion se boa* cuaiquier persona que puede necesitar Ios alojamientos eSPeciales para esta reunion debe .toritactar EMPleado de Ia .Ciudad '(772) 646-6301 por io rnenos 4.$ horat en avancede Ia reunion. CITY OF FELLSMERE by: Deborah C, Krages, CMC City RfOlti51411,0IsF,J2k..4:W0 Local Section -Press Journal -(March 27th a(A0:04.14,20:.) • ahpecO0oryL_Tra.4pfSpOplyJinpl.DaQ 17 WWD 1.7,19 ORDINANCE No.2019.-03 AN ORDINANCE OF THE:CITY OFFELLSMERE,INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, PROVIDINGFOR VOLUNTARY ANNEXATION' OF 12.85 ACRES MORE: OR LESS LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF COUNTY ROAD, 512 EAST OF INTERSTATE HIGHWAY NO 95, EAST OF Tag RACETRAC SERVICE STATION AND WEST OF 106Th AVENUE INTO THE CITY OF FELISMERg; PROVIDING FOR RATIFICATION; PROVIDING FOR LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF THE:PIZOIsERTY ANNEXED;::PROVIDING FOR:REDEFINING THE: BOUNDAIW OF THE CITY LEVITIS; PROVD)Is1G,FORINTERIK LAND USE AND ZONING CLASSIFICATION;PROVIDING FOR FILING WITH TRE CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT, DEPARTMENT' OF STATE AND TRE CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY;PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY;, PROVIDING FOR CONFLICTS 11:(9•91ppsrp FQR, AN ;EFFECTIVE DATE. EREAS, RO,Ect Corp., :a Florida corporatiOn. as StieceSsor.by. Merger. with Anterian Mutual Corp., a Florida corporation recorded in OfficialReterda Book 467, Page 462 of ibc'Public Rccords:ollikliarr — River County, Florida (the "Owner!), ;the Owner of the land. described herein, has petitioned! the City for voluntary annexation Of Said land and dile *public. notice of this action has been giVenand. WHEREAS, the. City Council has determined :that the land described herein is stibstantially contiguous to the present boundary of the City, will net result in the creation of any enclaves and constitutes a r6O'solfably bo**t od4ipil to:the incorporated teritiarY Of the Cit; and WHEREAS, the City.' Council of the City of FellaMerejlorida, finds and determines that the •annexation ofsaid land is in best httereStOf the city: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED. BY THE CITY •COUNCIL OF THE .CITY OF FEILSMERE,. INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1, :RATIFICATION. The.abovereeitals are hereby.ratified; confirmed,udoptectund incorporated.hereinias.legislatiVesnndings of the -City 'Council., SECTION 2. PROPERTY ANNEXED. The follosvingdescribed,land heing!situated in the unincorporated areaof Indian River COunty,State of 'Merida; is hereby annexed intothe. Cityof Fellsmere; Florida: SeeExhibit AV:ate:died-hereto and by this reference -bade a parthereof. The annexed land is also shoWn On the map attached hereto, as Exhibit "13'i, and by this reference made a part hereof SECTION:3. BOUNDARY OF CITY LIMITS REDEFINED, On the effective date of this Ordinance, the cOrpOratelimits and boundary linesOf the City of Fellsmere, Indian River County, :Florida, shall .be redefined toinclude therein the above described land. SECTION 4. INTERIM LAND ,USE AND ZONING CLASSIFICATION: To the extent necessary the interiin land :use and zoning Classification- for .this property shall be consistent with the .proviiions of State la*, SECTIONS. FILING. Following adoption of this Ordinancei the City Clerk is hereby directed to (0.00979941D0c.1 ) — Page 1 of 2 18 file:a:copy with the Clerk of C ken tcourti, Indian River county; FlOrid.. a, the ObietAdutinistrativeOfficet-of Indian River Cennty,P ler' daand withthe.Departinentqf State:within seven(7)days tifter:adoPt fon, Foliowing adioption:.'9ftiji.,Ordiilaaca, the CityClerk. ishereby directed to file a revision of Article I Doundarienf the City Charter With the.Department of State within thirty (30) days after adoption; The City Cleric:is also hereby directed tosubmit within, said. thirty (30) days A copy of such revision .to. the Office of Econoniic: and IDetnegraPhie Research along a statement specifyirighepOpu lager) census effect and the affected land area. . . SECTION '6. .SEVERABILITY; If any 'section; parrof :a sentence, .phrase :or. Word: of, this Ordiitanceisfar any ?!.00s0.0 4e1t130:be unconstitutional, inoperative Or void, suckhOldings shall not affect the remaining witiO.risitoi.Ofand. it shall be:.construedto have' been thelegislative intent to pas s. this Ordinance without such .unconstitutionali invali&orinoperativepart; SECTION 7. CONFLICT& .All ordinances or. parts. of ordinances in conflict herewith :are repealed: tothe extent of conflict. SECTION 8. EFFECTIVE DATE. Following its adoption and. recordation, including the AnnekationAgreetrientattaelled•hereto-as-ExhibitiV,Ittsigne&by-the45,vneriDeveloper-andanyMerigagee(a),. thisOrdinance shall become effective. The foregoing:Ordinance wasinoved foradoption by:Cott n.cilMem ber The motinnwassecondedby.COnneil 'Member and,:upon being put to a vote, The Vota:was as follows: Mayer; Joel Tyson. Council: Member Fernando Herrera Council Member IrioCensiagernandez Council Member Sata.J. Sava& Counzil Mein bcr Jessica Salgado The: Mayor thereupon •cieclared, this Ordiaanee fully passed and adopted this day of ,2,01:9. CITY OF FELLSMERE, FLORIDA. Joel Tyson, Mayor ATTEST: Deborah Krages, CMC, City *Clerk IIIEREBY CERTIFY that Notice ofthe public hearings onthiltirdinancemas.published in thel'ress JOhrnal,;wrequiredby,StAWStatgc, that the foregoing Qidttinqp,wa$ dilly pased.antl adopted - on ,to day of, 2019, and the, first reading Was :held on the . . . day of . ... .., 2019, and that the first public hearingwas heldon the day of 2619, and that the .secoridpublic hearing andr final read i ngwas held on the day of ,2O19. 'Deborah C. Pages, cMC, City Clerk (0607904.DOc.i. ) •-•,-Page (11'2 19 EXHILOT "A" LE:GAL DES' N METES AND. BOUNDS PEKSU RVEYOR [Oly)THENORTHVyEST[ORNEKoFTHESOUTHEAST1/410FTHE5bUTHEAST1/4OF3ECTI8N 2Q,.TOWNSHIP 31 SOLITH,:RANGE 38.'EAST,'INDIAN RIVER COUNP(,,FLORIPA;' THENCE SOUTH 013.°15'40" DEPARTMENTOF:UAWORTATIox mAr.s.KTIONs808-2:403; THENCE iSfoRTH 88°10136 EAST ALONG. .THESAIDSOUTH.RIGHTtiP WAY.LINE dr STATE ROAD:#512-,:.A DISTANCE -OF 890,23. FEET TO TH E'POINT OF: Bt6INNING .br'• THE FiEllEIN DESCRIBED PARCEL'. FROM.SAID POINT OF BEGINNING,. CONTINUE. INTERSECTION WITH NEWEST :LINE.OF:BL,OCK B, VERO LAKE ESTATESUNITH=4,, ACCORDI TO PLAT THEREOF AS.RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 6, .PAGE 31,:.OF THE.PUBLIt.preoiips•OF iNpIAN RivFR COUNTY, FLOttiDA. THENCE NORTH 00°2110",EAST.ALONG.THE SAID WEST LINE or BLOCK B A DISTANCE 'OF 3.94 FEBTg A.POINT OF0RV.ATUREOFA�B�L��V �ENC��� NGSwD -[URVEH/0/NGABAD|U�OfIS�OFet THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE /QF9O^1S'S5",FURANARC LENGTH Of 3939''.FEETTOA POINT ON THE NORTH LINE dr.SAID BLQCK B AND A POINT OF TANGENCY;. THEN[EsbUTAm9W1.$^:A5TAL1)NGTHESAIANORTHi|NEOFBLO[KRAND8LOCkAOFS4|DVERO LAKE ESTATES UNIT H4 A DISTANCE OF548.80FEET TO: AN INEERSECrION W!TFI TUE WEST RIGHT 0F WAY UNEOF:1UGTH/VENUEA:s,�xd N(]NTHESA|D.PLAJOFVERDIAKEESTAT[SUN|TH.4.ANDA Pn(N7'OFCURVATURE 'OF A CIRCULAR CURVE; H NCEAi8NGSAUJVxBTmGHTnFVVAYumE SOUTHEASTERLY AND ALONG SAID CURVE, 1-IAVING A RADIUS OF 25 00 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE nF.89,45'O7�FOR AN ARC LENGTH OF 39 16 FEET TO A POINT OF TANGENCY,THENCE 'CONTINUE ALONG SAID WEST RIGHT OFWAY SOuTHbh"Z2'4.9"yVE3TADISTANCE oFS01.9OFEE7ToA oOoxTOTcVRVfTV0EQF&C|BCOL&W.CUVVE; TdENCE CONTINUE ALONG SAID WEST RIGHT OF WAY AND SOUTHWESTERLY ALONGSAID.CURVE, HAVING A RADIUS OF 25.K.FEET, THROUGH •A CENTRAL ANGLE OF89^S0'14"^pOKAmAR[L8VGTHOF39.2OFEET TO.APOINT ONTHE NQRTHR\GHT.QFWAY LINE DF94THSTREET A3'SHOVVNON'THE 34|b'pLATQFVER0'LAKEESTATES uN}T*KAmDAPo|mToF TANGENCY.;. THEOC.E.NORTH 89°46'57'WESTAI,ONG SAID NORTH,RIGHT OF WAY LINE A DISTANCE OF. 1187,76 FEET TO A POINTOF CURVATURE OF A CIRCULAR CURVE, THENCEORTHVVE5TERLYALONG SAID g)VVE,.HAVING AnAD|VSpF2,Ssp.FEET, THROUGH ACENTRAL ANGLE OF90.°02.37".,FbRANARC LENGTH OF 39 29 FEET TO A POINT ON THE EAST RIGF-IT OF WAY LINE OF x08TkiAyENVExSDHOVyNnm THESAID:PLAT OF VERO LAKE ESTATES.UNIT H-4 AND A POINT OF'TANGENCYTHENCE NORTH 00i5'40" EAST ALONG SAID EAST RIGHT OF'VVA/UNE. A0STANcE[}p02.GWF�!THENdES0VTH$9rS1'26" EAST A0STANCE.:0p.y.FEFT; THEN[ENo0TH:OQr16'4CY^EAST ADISTANCE QFA2Q.66FEET TOTHE PO|NTOFFgo|NNlmG. 5Ai}.rkieELCONTAN$SS1,268.151:WABEFEETOR12iaS5 A[RC5:68ORE1OVL[S6' 20 EXHIBIT "64!.. E5dstlng RiLiCeIrcX, Slte NIASTELLER &W101114; O. CCN5Vatia e5. *rows OrOmar...aim mot 1655_7746119£Er -,5106.2; VCR4PEEAM, ly.GRIPA.37464 (TM 5675200, / *AX17721 no-nis • • l'!=1;0p0' TSG Site' 1- (HcitChed) G.R. 512 (Fellsmere Rd.) :0 ztA ifk5 0 14-th'.5t 4:113rd .St llst St 0 14,11t -s: of. ?Nrine?cditlptn (Shaded) 14tet 5t 13rd St .c12nd St 11st :Location map TritctOr Supply COMpapy. 01ty of Feliturkeiti 02/2812019: JEFFREY R. SMITH, CPA, CGFO, CGMA Clerk of Circuit. Court & Comptroller Finance Department 1801 27th Street Vero Beach, FL 32960 TO: HONORABLE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS FROM: ELISSA NAGY, FINANCE DIRECTOR THRU: JEFFREY R. SMITH, COMPTROLLER DATE: March 7, 2019 SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF CHECKS AND ELECTRONIC PAYMENTS March 1, 2019 to March 7, 2019 In compliance with Chapter 136.06, Florida Statutes, all checks and electronic payments issued by the Board of County Commissioners are to be recorded in the Board minutes. Approval is requested for the attached lists of checks and electronic payments, issued by the Comptroller's office, .for the time period of March 1, 2019 to March 7, 2019. 22 TRANS NBR 378745 378746 378747 378748 378749 378750 378751 378752 378753 378754 378755 378756 378757 378758 378759 378760 378761 378762 378763 378764 378765 378766 378767 378768 378769 378770 378771 378772 378773 378774 378775 378776 378777 378778 378779 378780 378781 378782 378783 378784 378785 378786 378787 378788 378789 378790 378791 378792 378793 378794 378795 378796 378797 378798 378799 378800 378801 378802 DATE 03/01/2019 03/01/2019 03/01/2019 03/01/2019 03/01/2019 03/01/2019 03/01/2019 03/01/2019 03/01/2019 03/01/2019 03/01/2019 03/01/2019 03/01/2019 03/01/2019 03/01/2019 03/01/2019 03/01/2019 03/01/2019 03/01/2019 03/01/2019 03/012019 03/01/2019 03/01/2019 03/01/2019 03/01/2019 03/01/2019 03/01/2019 03/01/2019 03/01/2019 03/01/2019 03/012019 03/01/2019 03/01/2019 03/01/2019 03/01/2019 03/01/2019 03/01/2019 03/01/2019 03/01/2019 03/01/2019 03/01/2019 03/01/2019 03/01/2019 03/01/2019 03/01/2019 03/01/2019 03/01/2019 03/01/2019 03/01/2019 03/01/2019 03/01/2019 03/01/2019 03/01/2019 03/01/2019 03/01/2019 03/01/2019 03/01/2019 03/01/2019 CHECKS WRITTEN VENDOR AMOUNT ORANGE COUNTY HOUSING & CD 681.45 VERO BEACH EDGEWOOD PLACE LP 566.00 GRACES LANDING LTD 9,498.00 LINDSEY GARDENS LTD 2,592.00 WILLIE C REAGAN 446.00 RIVER PARK ASSOCIATES LIMITED 14,329.00 CREATIVE CHOICE HOMES XVI LTD 16,080.00 DAVID YORK 596.00 ST FRANCIS MANOR OF VERO BEACH, 256.00 TREASURE COAST HOMELESS SERVICES 1,237.00 FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT 288.00 VENETIAN APARTMENTS OF VERO BEACH 386.00 PINNACLE GROVE LTD 3,281.00 VERO CLUB PARTNERS LTD 16,805.00 DAVID SPARKS 378.00 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY HOUSING AUTHORITY 1,584.00 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY HOUSING AUTHORITY 257.00 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY HOUSING AUTHORITY 416.00 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY HOUSING AUTHORITY 518.00 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY HOUSING AUTHORITY 3,530.00 CRAIG MERRILL 897.00 CHRISTINE SALTER 477.00 HAGGERTY FAMILY LTD 367.00 SUNQUEST INC 4,421.00 THE PALMS AT VERO BEACH 11,543.00 DAVID CONDON 657.00 HILARY MCIVOR 702.00 PELICAN ISLES' LP 6,980.00 SUNCOAST REALTY & RENTAL MGMT LLC 4,489.00 OAK RIVER PROPERTIES INC 433.00 SONRISE VILLAS LTD 1,864.00 ADINA GOLDMAN 615.00 INDIAN RIVER RDA LP 4,213.00 GEORGE THUYNS 638.00 LAZY J LLC 2,008.00 JESSE LEWIS 667.00 SYLVIA MCNEILL 727.00 SKOKIE HOLDINGS INC 679.00 ROGER WINSLOW 468.00 OSLO VALLEY PROPERTIES INC 205.00 SAID S MOOBARK 1,335.00 LINDSEY GARDENS II LTD 7,034.00 ANTHONY ARROYO 695.00 AHS HOLDINGS GROUP LLC 2,043.00 DANIEL CORY MARTIN 517,00 YVONNE KOUTSOFIOS 54.00 ALAN R TOKAR 679.00 VERO BEACH VILLAS I LLC 457.00 BRIAN E GALLAGHER 540.00 HOUSING AUTHORITY 775.08 STEPHANIE WATCHEK FOUNTAIN TRUST 162.00 SCOT W I LKE 510.00 THEODORE BARTOSIEWICZ 497.00 FOUNDATION FOR AFFORDABLE RENTAL 19,785.00 RICHARD KUSSEROW 469.00 ARE JAY INVESTMENTS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY IT 509.00 JOHN T STANLEY 782.00 WEDGEWOOD RENTALS LLC 1,593.00 1 23 TRANS NBR 378803 378804 378805 378806 378807 378808 378809 378810 378811 378812 378813 378814 378815 378816 378817 378818 378819 378820 378821 378822 378823 378824 378825 378826 378827 378828 378829 378830 378831 378832 378833 378834 378835 378836 378837 378838 378839 378840 378841 378842 378843 378844 378845 378846 378847 378848 378849 378850 378851 378852 378853 378854 378855 378856 378857 378858 378859 378860 378861 378862 DATE 03/01/2019 03/01/2019 03/01/2019 03/01/2019 03/01/2019 03/01/2019 03/01/2019 03/01/2019 03/01/2019 03/01/2019 03/01/2019 03/01/2019 03/01/2019 03/04/2019 03/07/2019 03/07/2019 03/07/2019 03/07/2019 03/07/2019 03/07/2019 03/07/2019 03/07/2019 03/07/2019 03/07/2019 03/07/2019 03/07/2019 03/07/2019 03/07/2019 03/07/2019 03/07/2019 03/07/2019 03/07/2019 03/07/2019 03/07/2019 03/07/2019 03/07/2019 03/07/2019 03/07/2019 03/07/2019 03/07/2019 03/07/2019 03/07/2019 03/07/2019 03/07/2019 03/07/2019 03/07/2019 03/07/2019 03/07/2019 03/07/2019 03/07/2019 03/07/2019 03/07/2019 03/07/2019 03/07/2019 03/07/2019 03/07/2019 03/07/2019 03/07/2019 03/07/2019 03/07/2019 VENDOR ALMA LUCKETT MCLAUGHLIN PROPERTIES LLC MYRIAM MELENDEZ WATSON REALTY GROUP JAMES R LYONS SHEJI LLC TONY GUTIERREZ PAUL CARONE WILLIE C REAGAN THE PALMS AT VERO BEACH HELPING HANDS REAL ESTATE & INVESTMENT CO MAXIPLEX LLC PAMELA CHAVEZ BRANDON ROUER PORT CONSOLIDATED INC COMMUNICATIONS INTERNATIONAL COMMUNICATIONS INTERNATIONAL SSES INC TEN -8 FIRE EQUIPMENT INC RANGER CONSTRUCTION IND INC VERO CHEMICAL DISTRIBUTORS INC RICOH USA INC VELDE FORD INC SAFETY PRODUCTS INC AT&T WIRELESS DATA FLOW SYSTEMS INC GRAINGER KELLY TRACTOR CO WILD LAND ENTERPRISES INC HACH CO CLIFF BERRY INC ALLIED ELECTRONICS INC BOUND TREE MEDICAL LLC PETES CONCRETE VERO INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY INC NEWMANS POWER SYSTEMS DELL MARKETING LP GOLF SPECIALTIES INC BLAKESLEE SERVICES INC BAKER & TAYLOR INC MIDWEST TAPE LLC H D INDUSTRIES INC BAKER DISTRIBUTING CO LLC CENGAGE LEARNING INC PALM TRUCK CENTERS INC PENWORTHY COMPANY GO COASTAL INC COMMUNITY ASPHALT CORP RIVER PARK ASSOCIATES LIMITED CREATIVE CHOICE HOMES XVI LTD FERGUSON ENTERPRISES INC PETTY CASH INDIAN RIVER COUNTY SHERIFF NAN MCKAY AND ASSOCIATES INC LIVINGSTON PAGE BLUE CROSS & BLUE SHIELD OF FLORIDA INC JANITORIAL DEPOT OF AMERICA INC TREASURE COAST HOMELESS SERVICES PUBLIX SUPERMARKETS ROGER CLEVELAND GOLF INC AMOUNT 825.00 1,363.00 522.00 3,388.00 407.00 439.00 593.00 621.00 850.00 1,133.00 1,229.00 900.00 700.00 1,270.00 794.40 24,108.20 1,654.00 5,689.59 1,788.28 1,068.26 594.03 162.98 1,136.06 1,834.30 931.40 408.08 570.23 2,140.14 29.92 344.07 451.50 144.24 163.60 6,050.00 54.52 3,023.80 10,505.09 1,500.00 65.00 2,167.18 532.21 225.56 78.10 432.81 568.60 844.48 125.10 125,867.25 502.00 350.00 670.15 30.00 30.00 892.50 60.00 27.44 162.32 270.39 24.54 94.65 2 TRANS NBR 378863 378864 378865 378866 378867 378868 378869 378870 378871 378872 378873 378874 378875 378876 378877 378878 378879 378880 378881 378882 378883 378884 378885 378886 378887 378888 378889 378890 378891 378892 378893 378894 378895 378896 378897 378898 378899 378900 378901 378902 378903 378904 378905 378906 378907 378908 378909 378910 378911 378912 378913 378914 378915 378916 378917 378918 378919 378920 378921 378922 DATE 03/07/2019 03/07/2019 03/07/2019 03/07/2019 03/07/2019 03/07/2019 03/07/2019 03/07/2019 03/07/2019 03/07/2019 03/07/2019 03/07/2019 03/07/2019 03/07/2019 03/07/2019 03/07/2019 03/07/2019 03/07/2019 03/07/2019 03/07/2019 03/07/2019 03/07/2019 03/07/2019 03/07/2019 03/07/2019 03/07/2019 03/07/2019 03/07/2019 03/07/2019 03/07/2019 03/07/2019 03/07/2019 03/07/2019 03/07/2019 03/07/2019 03/07/2019 03/07/2019 03/07/2019 03/07/2019 03/07/2019 03/07/2019 03/07/2019 03/07/2019 03/07/2019 03/07/2019 03/07/2019 03/07/2019 03/07/2019 03/07/2019 03/07/2019 03/07/2019 03/07/2019 03/07/2019 03/07/2019 03/07/2019 03/07/2019 03/07/2019 03/07/2019 03/07/2019 03/07/2019 VENDOR ACUSHNET COMPANY FLORIDA WATER & POLLUTION CONTROL FLORIDA WATER & POLLUTION CONTROL FLORIDA WATER & POLLUTION CONTROL FLORIDA WATER & POLLUTION CONTROL FLORIDA WATER & POLLUTION CONTROL FLORIDA WATER & POLLUTION CONTROL TIMOTHY ROSE CONTRACTING INC TIMOTHY ROSE CONTRACTING INC CALLAWAY GOLF SALES COMPANY FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT WESTIN INNIBROOK RESORT TAYLOR MADE GOLF CO INC GIFFORD YOUTH ACHIEVEMENT CENTER INC KENNETH CAMPBELL SENIOR SUNSHINE STATE ONE CALL OF FL INC GREY HOUSE PUBLISHING ALAN C KAUFFMANN VETERANS ADMINISTRATION ARNOLD AIR CONDITONING INC KEEP INDIAN RIVER BEAUTIFUL INC RAMADA INN & CONFERENCE CENTER NABORS GIBLIN & NICKERSON PA BRIDGESTONE AMERICAS INC ECONOLITE CONTROL PRODUCTS INC THE PALMS AT VERO BEACH TRANE US INC CELICO PARTNERSHIP U S BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION VAN WAL INC BLUE PLANET ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS INC SYNAGRO-WWT INC FASTENAL COMPANY SOUTHERN JANITOR SUPPLY INC OCLC ONLINE COMPUTER LIBRARY CENTER ETR LLC STAPLES CONTRACT & COMMERCIAL INC GLOVER OIL COMPANY INC 'ADMIN FOR CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT ADMIN FOR CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT ADMIN FOR CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT GERELCOM INC ARDAMAN & ASSOCIATES INC NORTH CAROLINA CHILD SUPPORT PAK MAIL JOHNNY B SMITH DANE MACDONA'LD GLOBALSTAR USA CHARLES A WALKER GUARDIAN COMMUNITY RESOURCE MANAGEMENT WINSUPPLY OF VERO BEACH ROBERT & DIANA LYNN LITTLETON BRENNTAG MID -SOUTH INC STATE FARM INS COMPANIES INC ECMC OVERDRIVE INC XYLEM WATER SOLUTION USA INC KEITH GROCHOLL PROMATIC INC PROMATIC INC AMOUNT 3,539.77 115.00 115.00 305.00 305.00 325.00 325.00 9,756.00 43,541.98 675.68 57,683.93 567.00 2,048.14 7,745.67 40.00 1.007.83 89.25 200.00 186.70 228.00 8,064.44 125.10 18,964.69 1,212.88 515.00 400.00 860.00 174.15 944.69 60.00 222.00 36.321.90 145.51 2.506.24 453.39 151.66 128.05 33,637.07 295.56 299.94 167.36 1.886.64 1.849.00 105.69 168.56 190.00 120.00 189.67 80.00 2,250.00 87.11 500.00 8,075.07 742.93 289.25 4,588.21 4,587.55 60.00 59.18 142.66 3 TRANS NBR 378923 378924 378925 378926 378927 378928 378929 378930 378931 378932 378933 378934 378935 378936 378937 378938 378939 378940 378941 378942 378943 378944 378945 378946 378947 378948 378949 378950 378951 378952 378953 378954 378955 378956 378957 378958 378959 378960 378961 378962 378963 378964 378965 378966 378967 378968 378969 378970 378971 378972 378973 378974 378975 378976 378977 378978 378979 378980 378981 378982 DATE 03/07/2019 03/07/2019 03/07/20 19 03/07/2019 03/07/2019 03/07/2019 03/07/2019 03/07/2019 03/07/2019 03/07/2019 03/07/2019 03/07/2019 03/07/2019 03/07/2019 03/07/2019 03/07/2019 03/07/2019 03/07/2019 03/07/2019 03/07/2019 03/07/2019 03/07/2019 03/07/2019 03/07/2019 03/07/2019 03/07/2019 03/07/2019 03/07/2019 03/07/2019 03/07/2019 03/07/2019 03/07/2019 03/07/2019 03/07/2019 03/07/2019 03/07/2019 03/07/2019 03/07/2019 03/07/20 19 03/07/2019 03/07/2019 03/07/2019 03/07/2019 03/07/2019 03/07/2019 03/07/2019 03/07/2019 03/07/2019 03/07/2019 03/07/2019 03/07/2019 03/07/2019 03/07/2019 03/07/2019 03/07/2019 03/07/2019 03/07/2019 03/07/2019 03/07/2019 03/07/2019 VENDOR NEWSOM OIL COMPANY REPROGRAPHIC SOLUTIONS INC LOWES HOME CENTERS INC MUNICIPAL EMERGENCY SERVICES INC ALEX MIKLO BURNETT LIME CO INC TREASURE COAST TURF INC PENGUIN RANDOM HOUSE LLC CARMEN LEWIS STRAIGHT OAK LLC ASW LLC DEBORAH CUEVAS FAMILY SUPPORT REGISTRY COAST TO COAST COMPUTER PRODUCTS INC TRINOVA -FLORIDA INC THE LAW OFFICES OF AMERITAS COBRA GOLF INCORPORATED HAWKINS INC FLORITURF SOD INC RICHARD SZPYRKA ANDERSEN ANDRE CONSULTING ENGINEERS INC KENDRA COPE INDIAN RIVER. LACROSSE ASSOCIATION INC CATHEDRAL CORPORATION UNIFIRST CORPORATION SOLAR SOLUTIONS WINDOW TINTING INC SITEONE LANDSCAPE SUPPLY LLC BARSALOU VENTURES LLC ADVANCE STORES COMPANY INCORPORATED EGP DOCUMENT SOLUTIONS LLC WURTH USA INC ENDRESS & HAUSER INC EASTERN PIPELINE CONSTRUCTION INC AC VETERINARY SPECIALTY SERVICES COLTON PARKER MATHESON TRI -GAS INC PEOPLE READY INC COLE AUTO SUPPLY INC JAMES W ENNIS CANON FINANCIAL SERVICES INC FORERUNNER TECHNOLOGIES INC WILLIAM S SCOTT NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE BETH NOLAN ADVANCED ROOFING INC WILLIAM SCOTT SECURITAS ELECTRONIC SECURITY INC THOMAS R PILIERO NESTLE WATERS NORTH AMERICA TOTAL ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES CORP CORE & MAIN LP BROWNELLS INC GOMEZ BROTHERS IRRIGATION LLC WOERNER AGRIBUSINESS LLC REXEL USA .INC SHELBROUGH SAFETY LLC STEPHEN STONE JOSEPH LORINO AMERICAN JANITORIAL INC AMOUNT 518.68 11.70 2,439.83 890.58 110.00 12,678.40 1,167.10 928.80 299.50 103.65 105.20 60.00 9.66 173.62 5,883.77 300.00 27.915.52 1,228.03 507.50 94.00 98.75 4,573.00 91.80 2,000.00 515.04 1,848.23 132.00 1,242.63 158.00 75.44 592.49 58.91 640.00 2,850.00 193.80 120.00 3,890.25 9,099.01 1,054.43 117.75 237.12 4,925.00 98.75 107.22 122.00 26,071.55 29.00 5,135.73 50.00 42.90 749.84 22.854.79 6,744.55 405.00 407.00 1,775.91 1,000.00 60.00 80.00 3,050.74 4 TRANS NBR 378983 378984 378985 378986 378987 378988 378989 378990 378991 378992 378993 378994 378995 378996 378997 378998 378999 379000 379001 37.9002 379003 379004 379005 379006 379007 379008 379009 379010 379011 379012 379013 379014 379015 379016 379017 Grand Total: DATE 03/07/2019 03/07/2019 03/07/2019 03/07/2019 03/07/2019 03/07/2019 03/07/2019 03/07/2019 03/07/2019 03/07/2019 03/07/2019 03/07/2019 03/07/2019 03/07/2019 03/07/2019 03/07/2019 03/07/2019 03/07/2019 03/07/2019 03/07/2019 03/07/2019 03/07/2019 03/07/2019 03/07/2019 03/07/2019 03/07/2019 03/07/2019 03/07/2019 03/07/2019 03/07/2019 03/07/2019 03/07/2019 03/07/2019 03/07/2019 03/07/2019 VENDOR CONCORDANCE HEALTHCARE SOLUTIONS LLC RAMONA MURPHY AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES INC HYDRO CONDUIT LLC VERONIQUE ORY STURIALE TMS EQUIPMENT SERVICES SOUTHERN COATINGS INC PIRATE PEST CONTROL LLC CALITEN LLC COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS AMERIGAS PROPANE LP AMERIGAS PROPANE LP KANSAS PAYMENT CENTER PSI TECHNOLOGIES INC JOHN J DRISCOLL DAVID MIKE JORDAN POWER EQUIPMENT CORP BALLOONS ETC INC JAMES ROMANEK RENFRO CORPORATION STUMP PRINTING CO INC MICHAEL DUNLEAVY CANOPY SPECIALIST HEALTHSTAT INC SHARON WELSH R.1 VERFRONT PACKING COMPANY LLC FLORIDA INDIAN HOBBYIST ASSOCIATION DIOGO LIRA REBECCA D SMITH JOHN P DONOHUE SPECIAL OLYMPICS FLORIDA INC CHRISTOPHER ROLLE CHRISTINA A TASCON TERRA MC LAUGHLIN MASTERSON ADVISORS LLC AMOUNT 482.38 65.00 2,902.69 8,408.80 30.00 1,750.00 5,556.85 592.00 33.28 154.00 154.00 469.54 219.69 3,628.00 130.00 110.00 312.78 636.44 120:00 344.87 739.81 60.00 600.00 6,250.00 3,383.82 1,634.38 250.00 80.00 50.00 90.15 421.87 100.00 5.45 150.00 5,141.97 832,820.54 5 TRANS. NBR 1014644 1014645 1014646 1014647 1014648 1014649 1014650 1014651 1014652 1014653 1014654 1014655 1014656 1014657 1014658 1014659 1014660 1014661 1014662 1014663 1014664 1014665 1014666 1014667 1014668 1014669 1014670 1014671 1014672 1014673 1014674 Grand Total: ELECTRONIC PAYMENT - VISA CARD DATE 03/01/2019 03/06/2019 03/06/2019 03/06/2019 03/06/2019 03/06/2019 03/06/2019 03/06/2019 03/06/2019 03/06/2019 03/06/2019 03/06/2019 03/06/2019 03/06/2019 03/06/2019 03/06/2019 03/06/2019 03/06/2019 03/06/2019 03/06/2019 03/07/2019 03/07/2019 03/07/2019 03/07/2019 03/07/201.9 03/07/2019 03/07/2019 03/07/2019 03/07/2019 03/07/2019 03/07/2019 VENDOR AT&T HELENA CHEMICAL COLD AIR DISTRIBUTORS WAREHOUSE :INDIAN RIVER OXYGEN :INC DEMCO INC AMERICAN CONCRETE INDUSTRIES INC APPLE INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY CO ALLIED UNIVERSAL CORP IRRIGATION CONSULTANTS UNLIMITED INC GROVE WELDERS INC COMO OIL COMPANY OF FLORIDA GLOBAL GOLF SALES INC BRIDGESTONE GOLF .INC CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DISTRIBUTORS INC HYDRA SERVICE (S) INC EASY PICKER GOLF PRODUCTS INC EF.E INC OFFICE DEPOT BSD CUSTOMER SVC COMCAST POLYDYNE INC ROBINSON EQUIPMENT COMPANY INC MIKES GARAGE & WRECKER SERVICE INC MEEKS PLUMBING INC RECORDED' BOOKS LLC SOUTHERN COMPUTER WAREHOUSE INC TOTAL TRUCK PARTS INC PRIDE ENTERPRISES SHRIEVI: CHEMICAL CO METRO FIRE PROTECTION SERVICES INC STAT MEDICAL DISPOSAL INC PACE ANYALYT1CAL LLC AMOUNT 547.02 795.93 684.99 71.00 1,641.04 710.00 198.35 2.453.65 59.15 828.00 70.00 430.30 1,572.48 131.81 1.699.87 892.37 1.045.32 62.07 280.27 2.576.00 986.57 1.623.00 256.55 419.80 2,174.52 16.50 23.00 4,004.00 689.50 325.00 216.00 28,484.06 28 TRANS NBR 6597 6598 6599 6600 6601 6602 6603 6604 6605 6606 6607 6608 6609 6610 6611 6612 6613 6614 6615 6616 6617 P -CARD 6618 6619 Grand Total: ELECTRONIC PAYMENTS WIRE & ACH DATE 03/01/2019 03/01/2019 03/01/2019 03/01/2019 03/01/2019 03/01/2019 03/01/2019 03/01/2019 03/01/2019 03/01/2019 03/04/2019 03/04/2019 03/04/2019 03/04/2019 03/04/2019 03/04/2019 03/04/2019 03/04/2019 03/04/2019 03/04/2019 03/04/2019 03/04/2019 03/05/2019 03/07/2019 VENDOR INDIAN RIVER COUNTY SUPERVISOR OF ELECTIONS 92,596.64 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY SHERIFF 4,076,513.98 CHARD SNYDER & ASSOCIATES INC 312.00 WEST HEALTH ADVOCATE SOLUTIONS INC 1,480.05 CLERK OF CIRCUIT COURT 86,776.25 C E R SIGNATURE CLEANING 5,250.00 ST LUCIE BATTERY & TIRE CO l .000.00 ALLSTATE 175.92 AMERICAN FAMILY LIFE ASSURANCE CO 19,067.36 MUTUAL OF OMAHA 7,329.08 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY PROPERTY APPRAISER 94.68 BLUE CROSS & BLUE SHIELD OF FLORIDA INC 36,500.00 BLUE CROSS & BLUE SHIELD OF FLORIDA INC 400.00 1 R C HEALTH INSURANCE - TRUST 7,570.84 I R C HEALTH INSURANCE - TRUST 631,135.40 IRC CHAMBER OF COMMERCE 13,033.16 FL RETIREMENT SYSTEM 630,155.78 MUTUAL OF OMAHA 17,593.34 HIGHMARK STOP LOSS 23,192.10 HIGHMARK STOP LOSS 254.16 FIDELITY SECURITY LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY 3,560.38 TD BANK, N.A. 9,352.03 RX BENEFITS INC 224,758.08 CULTURAL COUNCIL OF IRC 6,711.60 5,894,812.83 29 1 JEFFREY R. SMITH, CPA, CGFO, CGMA Clerk of Circuit Court & Comptroller Finance Department 1801 27th Street Vero Beach, FL 32960 TO: HONORABLE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS FROM'. ELISSA NAGY, FINANCE DIRECTOR T.HRU: JEFFREY R. SMITH, COMPTROLLER DATE: March 14, 2019 SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF CHECKS AND ELECTRONIC PAYMENTS March 8, 2019 to March 14, 2019 In compliance with Chapter 136.06, Florida - Statutes, all checks and electronic payments issued by the Board of County Commissioners are to be recorded in the Board minutes. Approval is requested for the attached lists of checks and electronic payments, issued by the Comptroller's office, for the time period of :March 8, 2019 to March 14, 2019. 30 TRANS NBR 379018 379019 379020 379021 379022 379023 379024 379025 379026 379027 379028 379029 379030 379031 379032 379033 379034 379035 379036 379037 379038 379039 379040 379041 379042 379043 379044 379045 379046 379047 379048 379049 379050 379051 379052 379053 379054 379055 379056 379057 379058 379059 379060 379061 379062 379063 379064 379065 379066 379067 379068 379069 379070 379071 379072 379073 379074 379075 DATE 03/13/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/20I9 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 CH ECKS WRITTEN VENDOR VIKING LANDSCAPING LLC PORT CONSOLIDATED INC COMMUNICATIONS INTERNATIONAL TEN -8 FIRE EQUIPMENT INC FISHER SCIENTIFIC COMPANY LLC VERO CHEMICAL DISTRIBUTORS INC PALMDALE OIL COMPANY INC RICOH USA INC KIMLEY HORN & ASSOC INC HENRY SCHEIN INC VELDE FORD INC SAFETY PRODUCTS INC DATA FLOW SYSTEMS INC DELTA SUPPLY CO GRAINGER WILD LAND ENTERPRISES INC CLIFF BERRY INC AVERY DENNISON CORPORATION ALLIED ELECTRONICS INC INDIAN RIVER CONTRACTING LLC NATIONAL FIRE PROTECTION ASSOC BOUND TREE MEDICAL LLC ECOTECI1 CONSULTANTS INC TIRESOLES OF BROWARD INC CITY ELECTRIC SUPPLY CHILDCARE RESOURCES OF IRC INC NEWMANS POWER SYSTEMS DELL MARKETING LP BAKER & TAYLOR INC BRANDTS APPLIANCE SERVICE INC MIDWEST TAPE LLC K & M ELECTRIC SUPPLY BAKER DISTRIBUTING CO LLC ATKINS NORTH AMERICA INC PALM TRUCK CENTERS INC GO COASTAL INC FLORIDA ASSOCIATION OF COUNTIES INC LINDSEY GARDENS LTD CREATIVE CHOICE HOMES XVI LTD PING INC CLERK OF CIRCUIT COURT CLERK OF CIRCUIT COURT INDIAN RIVER COUNTY HEALTH DEPT CITY OF VERO BEACI-I FERGUSON ENTERPRISES INC FLORIDA DEPT OF TRANSPORTATION JANITORIAL DEPOT OF AMERICA INC WAL MART STORES EAST LP ROGER CLEVELAND GOLF INC FLORIDA WATER & POLLUTION CONTROL FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP TYLER TECHNOLOGIES INC MORGAN & EKLUND INC TIMOTHY ROSE CONTRACTING INC TRAFFIC PARTS INC CALLAWAY GOLF SALES COMPANY AMOUNT 7,500.00 913.02 453,211.59 594.66 66.58 348.72 8,369.09 173,69 1,622.50 387.90 20.18 423.19 2,227.43 158.18 3,730.33 11.22 280.00 959.00 202.70 669.51 1,525.50 5,262.98 5,332.00 770.48 405.12 23,959.00 484.82 17,100.00 5,100.66 210.90 519.23 3.767.61 121.21 2,929.80 638.42 91.50 50.00 621.00 450.00 1,858.90 446.03 223.00 796.80 2.980.87 1,975.60 19.00 1,417.02 160.63 1,989.83 325.00 29.24 53.26 57.38 950.00 25,300.00 164,840.96 2.283.00 5,067.33 1 TRANS NBR 379076 379077 379078 379079 379080 379081 379082 379083 379084 379085 379086 379087 379088 379089 379090 379091 379092 379093 379094 379095 379096 379097 379098 379099 379100 379101 379102 379103 379104 379105 379106 379107 379108 379109 379110 379111 379112 379113 379114 379115 379116 379117 379118 379119 379120 379121 379122 379123 379124 379125 379126 379127 379128 379129 379130 379131 379132 379133 379134 379135 DATE 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 VENDOR FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOCIATION PEACE RIVER ELECTRIC COOP INC KENNETH CAMPBELL SENIOR WASTE MANAGEMENT INC CATHOLIC CHARITIES DIOCESE OF PALM BCH LANGUAGE LINE SERVICES INC STRUNK FUNERAL HOMES & CREMATORY TOCOMA RUBBER STAMP & MARKING SYSTEM TREASURE COAST SPORTS COMMISSION INC IRC HEALTHY START COALITION INC IRC HEALTHY START COALITION INC IRC HEALTHY START COALITION INC IRC HEALTHY START COALITION 'INC IRC HEALTHY START COALITION INC WINDSOR PROPERTIES ALAN C KAUFFMANN ARNOLD AIR CONDITONING INC INDIAN RIVER COUNTY HISTORICAL JOHN BROWN & SONS INC VERO CLUB PARTNERS LTD INDIAN RIVER COUNTY HOUSING AUTHORITY BRIDGESTONE AMERICAS INC ECONOLITE CONTROL PRODUCTS INC THE PALMS AT VERO BEACH CELICO PARTNERSHIP WILLIAM SCHUTT CINTAS CORPORATION NO 2 FASTENAL COMPANY UNITED RENTALS NORTH AMERICA INC MBV ENGINEERING INC MBV ENGINEERING INC CENTRAL PUMP & SUPPLY INC MASTELLER & MOLER INC STAPLES CONTRACT & COMMERCIAL INC GLOVER OIL COMPANY INC ACOUSTI ENGINEERING COMPANY OF FLORIDA GERELCOM INC ARDAMAN & ASSOCIATES INC ORCHID ISLAND PROPERTY MGMT 11 INC PETER OBRYAN PAK MAIL TOTAL TEMPERATURE INSTRUMENTATION INC JOHNNY B SMITH GATES HOUSE ENTERPRISES LLC CHARLES A WALKER INDIAN RIVER RDA LP REDLANDS CHRISTIAN MIGRANT ASSOC GUARDIAN COMMUNITY RESOURCE MANAGEMENT AAPMVR CORP ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES COUNCIL OF IRC KWACKS INC ROBERT SOLARI NICOLACE MARKETING INC ALERT ALL CORPORATION AMERICAN SIGNAL COMPANY WEST CONSTRUCTION INC GUETTLER BROTHERS CONSTRUCTION LLC LINDSEY GARDENS II LTD AMOUNT 58,458.44 663.16 110.00 218.07 120.00 194,923.62 4,867.64 124.60 425.00 22.54 1,360.00 2,500.00 5,000.00 5,000.00 5,000.00 1.666.66 4,565.57 240.00 415.00 3,987.50 13,570.00 393.00 16.00 547.68 524.00 621.00 1.696.80 201.64 43.72 191.55 19,000.00 850.00 15.3 84.25 188.29 600.00 186.93 36,360.55 2,816.00 3,008.00 213.00 675.00 111.32 24.12 3,661.42 170.00 75.95 120.00 534.00 4,822.51 1,000.00 1,619.50 3,852.39 19,043.08 92.32 318.75 395.00 36,450.00 216.486.21 117,907.99 400.00 2 TRAINS NBR 379136 379137 379138 379139 379140 379141 379142 379143 379144 379145 379146 379147 379148 379149 379150 379151 379152 379153 379154 379155 379156 379157 379158 379159 379160 379161 379162 379163 379164 379165 379166 379167 379168 379169 379170 379171 379172 379173 379174 379175 379176 379177 379178 379179 379180 379181 379182 379183 379184 379185 379186 379187 379188 379189 379190 379191 379192 379193 379194 379195 DATE 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/.14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 VENDOR AMOUNT FLORIDA COAST EQUIPMENT INC 43,820.04 BERMUDA SANDS APPAREL LLC 618.45 DANIEL CORY MARTIN 713.00 KEITH GROCHOLL 60.00 VEROTOWN LLC 475.00 WATERSIDE HOMES OF VERO BEACH LLC 400.00 TAMPA CRANE & BODY INC 2,183.60 REHMANN GROUP LLC 9,865.00 OCEAN RESEARCH & CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION II' 238.79 TAW ORLANDO SERVICE CENTER INC 2,681.95 REPROGRAPHIC SOLUTIONS INC 31.50 LOWES HOME CENTERS INC 2,052.74 CARDINAL HEALTH 110 ,INC 3,314.74 PPG ARCHITECTURAL FINISHES INC 352.85 MUNICIPAL EMERGENCY SERVICES INC 768.75 ALEX MIKLO 110.00 BURNETT LIME CO INC 3,166.80 TREASURE COAST TURF INC 450.00 CARMEN LEWIS 347.50 KRAUS ASSOCIATES INC 22,475.00 SOUTHERN MANAGEMENT LLC 22,438.00 STEWART & STEVENSON FDDA LLC 1,452.93 STEWART & STEVENSON FDDA LLC 1,058.00 SUSAN ADAMS 131.90 REI ENGINEERS INC 1,021.00 TRINOVA -FLORIDA INC 3,398.92 BERNARD EGAN & COMPANY 16,996.00 ARROW INTERNATIONAL 1,115.50 MASCHMEYER CONCRETE COMPANY OF FLORIDA 3,640.00 COBRA GOLF INCORPORATED 1,309.92 CORNERSTONE FAMILY SERVICES OF WEST VIRGINIA 425.00 HAWKINS INC 1,167.25 RANDY KING 1,223.60 SCRIPPS NP OPERATING LLC 773.37 JC CODE & CONSTRUCTION CONSULTANTS INC 970.40 JENNIFER HYDE 31.15 UNIFIRST CORPORATION 1,218.52 CDA SOLUTIONS INC 35,711.54 SOLAR SOLUTIONS WINDOW TINTING INC 288.00 SITEONE LANDSCAPE SUPPLY LLC 158.82 EGP DOCUMENT SOLUTIONS LLC 99.00 FLORIDA EAST COAST HOLDINGS CORP 3,600.00 EZLINKS GOLF LLC 300.00 SHEILA O'SULLIVAN 117.22 ICON SUPPLY INC 6,446.98 COVERALL NORTH AMERICA INC 2,230.00 DEBBIE CARSON 100.00 PEOPLE READY INC 8,892.64 AQSEPTENCE GROUP INC 239.45 CANARX GROUP INC 7,207.10 COLE AUTO SUPPLY INC 1,304.94 KONICA MINOLTA BUSINESS SOLUTIONS 1,047.40 BETH NOLAN 67.00 THOMAS R PILIERO 45.00 RECYCLING ROCKS LLC 1,400.00 FLORIDA BULB & BALLAST INC 3,354.50 NESTLE WATERS NORTH AMERICA 13.94 CALVIN GIORDANO & ASSOCIATES INC 10,856.25 CORE & MAIN LP 41,890.29 JOE PAYNE .INC 15,885.48 3 TRANS NBR 379196 379197 379198 379199 379200 379201 379202 379203 379204 379205 379206 379207 379208 379209 379210 379211 379212 379213 379214 379215 379216 379217 379218 379219 379220 379221 379222 379223 379224 379225 379226 379227 379228 379229 379230 379231 379232 379233 379234 379235 379236 379237 379238 379239 379240 379241 379242 379243 379244 379245 379246 379247 379248 379249 379250 379251 379252 379253 379254 379255 DATE 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 VENDOR AMOUNT BROWNELLS INC 6,350.40 WARREN CATER SON 200.00 DJD EQUIPMENT HOLDINGS LLC 2,624.99 TIMOTHY L DURFEE 4,485.00 BOTTOMS UP BEVERAGE OF FLORIDA LLC 868.00 TYKES & TEENS INC 6,403.00 BIKE WALK INDIAN RIVER COUNTY INC 1,625.00 THERNELL MILLS 60.00 STEPHEN STONE 160.00 JOSEPH LORINO 20.00 DIRECTV GROUP INC 44.25 RESCUE TRAINING ASSOCIATES INC 1,900.00 ELITE PROPERTY MANAGEMENT GROUP LLC 150.00 APTIM ENVIRONMENTAL & INFRASTRUTURE INC 24,097.23 EMPIRE PIPE ORLANDO LLC 14,874.00 PICKLEBALL UNIVERSITY INC 556.00 AUSTIN HUNT 400.00 CONCORDANCE HEALTHCARE SOLUTIONS LLC 111.90 RAMONA MURPHY 59.50 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES INC 354.54 MATTHEW GURNSEY 350.00 HYDRO CONDUIT LLC 62,988.40 VERONIQUE ORY STURIALE 60.00 LUBRICATION ENGINEERS INC 975.00 PREMIER LANDSCAPE SOLUTIONS OF IR LLC 3,390.00 TERRACON CONSULTANTS INC 1,648.75 JOHN TORRES 40.00 KINDERGARTEN READINESS COLLABORATIVE 5,363.63 AMERIGAS PROPANE LP 841.13 AMERIGAS PROPANE LP 2,171.68 AMERIGAS PROPANE LP 2,300.41 COONEY SURVEYING & MAPPING LLC 1,900.00 GOLFTNI INC 708.00 JOHN J DRISCOLL 170.00 DAVID MIKE 120.00 BENEFIT EXPRESS SERVICES LLC 25,728.75 JORDAN POWER EQUIPMENT CORP 193.95 AQUATIC PLANTS OF FL INC 2,614.25 THE I -TURD GROUP INC 11,652.00 DROPBOX INC 5,100.00 RALPH V WEBB 19,422.00 COASTLINE COOLING LLC 25.00 SYTECH INC 1,500.00 DIOGO LIRA 120.00 GEORGE KAHLE 9,726.54 CHERYL TURNER 92.53 VINCENT SNYDER 170.00 LAUREL BROWN 692.06 KIMBERLY K MOIRANO 12.99 GRANT WRITING USA 455.00 VERO BEACH LAND COMPANY LLC 2.312.21 MHAMMED HAMDI 204.00 UTIL REFUNDS 43.26 UTIL REFUNDS 48.03 UTIL REFUNDS 50.05 UTIL REFUNDS 43.26 UTIL REFUNDS 48.71 UTIL REFUNDS 16.96 UTIL REFUNDS 145.37 UTIL REFUNDS 27.56 4 TRANS NBR 379256 379257 379258 379259 379260 379261 379262 379263 379264 379265 379266 379267 379268 379269 379270 379271 379272 379273 379274 379275 379276 379277 379278 379279 379280 379281 379282 379283 379284 379285 379286 379287 379288 379289 379290 379291 379292 379293 379294 379295 379296 379297 379298 379299 379300 379301 379302 379303 379304 379305 379306 379307 379308 379309 379310 379311 379312 379313 379314 379315 DATE 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/1412019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 VENDOR UTIL REFUNDS UTIL REFUNDS UTIL REFUNDS UTIL REFUNDS UTIL REFUNDS UTIL. REFUNDS UTIL REFUNDS UTIL REFUNDS UTIL REFUNDS UTIL REFUNDS UTIL REFUNDS UTIL REFUNDS UTIL REFUNDS UTIL REFUNDS UTIL REFUNDS UTIL REFUNDS UTIL REFUNDS UTIL REFUNDS UTIL REFUNDS UTIL REFUNDS UTIL REFUNDS UTIL REFUNDS UTIL REFUNDS UTIL REFUNDS UTIL REFUNDS UTIL REFUNDS UTIL REFUNDS UTIL REFUNDS UTIL REFUNDS UTIL REFUNDS UTIL REFUNDS UTIL REFUNDS UTIL REFUNDS UTIL REFUNDS UTIL REFUNDS UTIL REFUNDS UTIL REFUNDS UTIL REFUNDS UTIL REFUNDS UTIL REFUNDS UTIL REFUNDS UTIL REFUNDS UTIL REFUNDS UTIL REFUNDS UTIL REFUNDS UTIL REFUNDS UTIL REFUNDS UTIL REFUNDS UTIL REFUNDS UTIL REFUNDS UTIL REFUNDS UTIL REFUNDS UTIL REFUNDS UTIL REFUNDS UTIL REFUNDS UTIL REFUNDS UTIL REFUNDS UTIL REFUNDS UTIL REFUNDS UTIL REFUNDS AMOUNT 100.00 97.32 15.23 82.71 66.44 8.10 52.75 14.93 43.26 72.94 44.74 42.58 4.32 21.83 86.54 41.37 66.24 73.78 81.71 94.84 91.39 42.76 51.02 1.78 55.93 87.08 136.60 270.23 51.81 74.40 74.40 44.22 10.90 141.55 79.15 70.82 70.46 19.03 82.95 80.22 59.62 43.26 61.61 44.13 69.49 93.12 71.20 84.51 95.44 36.68 69.15 359.36 100.00 11.11 54.45 70.74 81.93 57.62 65.74 42.30 5 TRANS N13R 379316 379317 379318 379319 379320 379321 . 379322 379323 379324 379325 379326 379327 379328 379329 379330 379331 379332 379333 379334 379335 379336 379337 379338 379339 379340 379341 379342 Grand Total: DATE 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03114/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/.14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 VENDOR UTIL REFUNDS UTIL REFUNDS UTIL REFUNDS UT1L REFUNDS UTIL REFUNDS UTIL .REFUNDS UTIL REFUNDS UTIL REFUNDS UTIL REFUNDS UTIL REFUNDS UT1L REFUNDS UT1L REFUNDS UT1L REFUNDS UTIL REFUNDS UTIL.REFUNDS 'UTIL REFUNDS UTIL 'REFUNDS UTI L. REFUNDS UTIL REFUNDS UTIL REFUNDS UT1L REFUNDS UT1L REFUNDS UT.ILREFUNDS UTIL REFUNDS UTIL REFUNDS UTIL REFUNDS UTIL REFUNDS AMOUNT 71.60 29.02 40.29 64.32 42.62 89.48 7.45 88.82 26.26 124.05 27.59 54:31 40.84 72.28 36.29 57.08 41.89 65.47 72.94 230.47 58.99 46.60 45.98 54.37 66.84 87.96 9.20 2,084,264.15 6 TRANS. NBR 1014675 1014676 1014677 1014678 1014679 1014680 1014681 1014682 1014683 1014684 1014685 1014686 1014687 1014688 1014689 1014690 10.14691 1014692 Grand Total: ELECTRONIC PAYMENT - VISA CARD DATE 03/12/2019 03/12/2019 03/12/2019 03/13/2019 03/13/2019 03/13/2019 03/13/2019 03/13/2019 03/13/2019 03/13/2019 03/.13/2019 03/13/2019 03/13/2019 03/13/2019 03/13/2019 03/13/2019 03/13/2019 03/14/2019 VENDOR AT&T WASTE MANAGEMENT INC COMCAST COMCAST INDIAN RIVER BATTERY INDIAN RIVER OXYGEN INC GALLS LLC ALLIED UNIVERSAL CORP IRRIGATION CONSULTANTS 'UNLIMITED INC GROVE WELDERS INC GLOBAL GOLF SALES INC CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DISTRIBUTORS INC AUTO PARTNERS LLC l-IYDRA SERVICE (S) INC COUNTY MATERIALS CORPORATION IMAGENET CONSULTING LLC EFE INC COMCAST AMOUNT 20,500.39 5,701.11 323.75 128.78 654.25 3,653.25 88.75 7,729.46 28.20 13,829.11. 803.90 97.47 63.93 3.526.73 6,074.40 187.78 1,092.29 352.83 64,836.38 1 TRANS Nl3R 6620 6621 6622 6623 6624 6625 6626 6627 6628 6629 6630 6631 6632 6633 6634 6635 6636 6637 6638 6639 6640 6641 6642 Grand Total: ELECTRONIC PAYMENTS - WIRE & ACH DATE 03/08/2019 03/08/2019 03/08/2019 03/08/2019 03/08/2019 03/08/2019 03/08/2019 03/08/2019 03/11/2019 03/11/2019 03/11/2019 03/12/2019 03/.12/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 03/14/2019 VENDOR NATIONWIDE SOLUTIONS RETIREMENT INC I R C HEALTH INSURANCE - TRUST C ER SIGNATURE CLEANING BLUE CROSS & BLUE SHIELD OF FLORIDA INC HIGHMARK STOP LOSS NATIONWIDE SOLUTIONS RETIREMENT INC 1RC FIRE FIGHTERS ASSOC TOTAL ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES CORP IRS -PAYROLL TAXES IRS -PAYROLL TAXES FL SDU IRS -PAYROLL TAXES CULTURAL COUNCIL OF IRC BLUE CROSS & BLUE SHIELD OF FLORIDA INC I R C HEALTH INSURANCE- TRUST FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE MUTUAL OF OMAHA IRS -PAYROLL TAXES HIGHMARK STOP LOSS RX BENEFITS INC AMOUNT 51,205.78 7,570.84 3,680.00 400.00 254.16 5,317.55 9,789.28 11,933.70 6,325.65 419,801.49 5,462.60 64.48 3,081.40 11,250.00 83,250.19 2,883.92 33,262.02 1,414.71 2,266.60 2,565.50 13,466.05 7,148.25 2,342.83 684,737.00 1 CONSENT INDIAN RIVER COUNTY OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET PURCHASING DIVISION DATE: March 11, 2019 TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS THROUGH: Jason E. Brown, County Administrator Kristin Daniels, Budget Director FROM: Jennifer Hyde, Purchasing Manager SUBJECT: Disposition of Former Fire Station 7 BACKGROUND: On February 5, 2019, the Board awarded bid 2019029 for the Demolition of former Fire Station 7 at 1215 82nd Avenue to Barth Construction, Inc. of Vero Beach for $28,370.00. The station has not operated from that site since mid -2015, and the building's condition has deteriorated. A purchase order has been issued, and Barth has begun the application process, but a demolition permit has not yet been issued by the Building Department. Staff has since been contacted by an individual that has expressed interest in purchasing the entire parcel, including the building slated for demolition. A change order to PO 82937 has been issued asking Barth to cease all demolition activities until further direction by the County. Barth has agreed to this request. ANALYSIS The sale of county -owned property to a non -adjacent property owner must be made through auction or sealed bid sale. Sealed bids can be solicited beginning March 31, 2019 and accepted until 2:00 p.m. on April 9, 2019, and presented to the Board on April 16, 2019. Staff recommends no action on the bid to demolish the structure be taken at this time, in the event no acceptable bid to purchase, as determined by the Board, is received. SOURCE OF FUNDS: Required advertisement of the sale is estimated to cost $160 and will be made available in the Fire Rescue — Legal Ads Account (11412022-034910). RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Board declare the property located at 1215 82"d Avenue (parcel 33381100001008000001.0) excess to the County's needs and direct staff to solicit offers for the property, as is, by sealed bid. 39 Office of Consent Agenda 03/26/2019 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY ATTORNEY Dylan Reingold., County Attorney William K. DeBraal, Deputy County Attorney Kate Pingolt Cotner, Assistant County Attorney MEMORANDUM TO: Board of County Commissioners FROM: William K. DeBraal, Deputy County Attorney DATE: March 11, 2019 SUBJECT: Third Amendment to Lease Agreement with Gifford Youth Achievement Center, Inc. In 2002, the Gifford Youth Activity Center, Inc. n/k/a Gifford Youth Achievement Center, Inc. (GYAC) entered into a Lease Agreement with the Board of County Commissioners (Board) for use of the Gifford Youth Activity Center located at 4875 43rd Avenue, Vero Beach, FL. The Lease Agreement called for an annual payment of $1.00 per year for a term of 40 years for the 4.34 acres of land. In January 2015, the Lease Agreement was extended to a term of 99 years to enable the GYAC to compete more favorably for grant funds and donations. On March 6, 2018, the Lease Agreement was amended for a second time to approve construction of a single story 13,000 square foot classroom building on the leased premises. The classroom building is designed for an additional story to be added at a later date. During the construction process, the project engineer expressed the need for additional property to be added to the Lease Agreement to be used for stormwater treatment. A small area of approximately 780 square feet (0.02 acres) near the northwest corner of the leased premises is needed in order to satisfy stormwater treatment requirements. Please see the sketch and legal description attached to the proposed Third Amendment to Lease Agreement. Staff has no objection to the Third Amendment. Funding. There is no direct funding impacted by this Third Amendment of Lease Agreement. Recommendation. Staff recommends that the Board authorize the Chairman to sign the Third Amendment to Lease Agreement between Indian River County and Gifford Youth Achievement Center, Inc. to add an additional 0.02 acres of property to the Lease Agreement to provide for the treatment of stormwater as a result of the new classroom building. Staff further recommends the Board authorize the Chairman to execute the resolution approving the lease amendment as required by Florida Statutes §125.38. Attachments: Third Amendment to Lease Agreement Sketch and Legal Description Resolution Approving Lease Amendment 40 THIRD AMENDMENT TO LEASE AGREEMENT THIS THIRD AMENDMENT TO LEASE AGREEMENT ("Third Amendment") dated as of March 7th , 2019, between the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, a political subdivision of the State of Florida (hereinafter called the "Board") whose address is 1801 27th Street, Vero Beach, FL 32960 and GIFFORD YOUTH ACTIVITY CENTER, INC. n/k/a GIFFORD YOUTH ACHIEVEMENT CENTER, INC., a Florida not for profit corporation (hereinafter called "GYAC") whose address is 4875 43rd Avenue, Vero Beach, FL 32967. BACKGROUND RECITALS A. On January 6, 1998, the Indian River County Board of County Commissioners as landlord entered into a lease agreement with the Progressive Civic League of Gifford, Florida, Inc. as tenant for the Gifford Youth Activities Center. B. On April 9, 2002, the Board considered a request made by the Gifford Youth Activity Center, Inc. with the support of the Progressive Civic League to become the tenant of the Gifford Youth Activity Center pursuant to a new lease. C. On November 19, 2002, the Board approved a new lease with the Gifford Youth Activity Center, inc. as tenant, for a term of forty (40) years at a rate of $1.00 per year. D. On January 20, 2015, the Board extended the lease with the GYAC, now known as the Gifford Youth Achievement Center to a 99 -year lease, with an ending date of December 31, 2114. E. On March 6, 2018, the Board approved a Second Amendment to Lease Agreement in order for plans for GYAC to build an additional structure on the leased premises consisting of a one story, 13,000 square foot classroom building that could be expanded to add a second story of 13,000 square feet in the future. F. During the construction of the classroom building, it was discovered that additional property for stormwater treatment was needed requiring a Third Amendment to the 2002 Lease. The Board and GYAC desire to enter into a Third Amendment to Lease Agreement to add the property needed for the required stormwater treatment. NOW THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, and intending to be legally bound, the parties agree as follows: BACKGROUND RECITALS. The Background Recitals are true and correct and form a material part of this Lease. AMENDMENT. The Lease dated November 19, 2002, shall be amended to add the real property to the leased premises for stormwater treatment purposes, and that property is more specifically depicted on the sketch and legal description attached as Exhibit "A" and incorporated by reference herein. UNCHANGED. Unless amended above, the terms and conditions of the Lease dated November 18, 2002 shall remain unchanged. 1 41 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Landlord and Tenant have executed this Third Amendment to Lease Agreement the day and year first above written. GIFFORD YOUTH ACHIEV ME 1 1 t_L‘ By:. An•elia Perry Executive Dir , INC. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA Witnessed by: signature:_/c1Pfa 'ittiNen, printed name: 7ivshri. Fiserson signature: printed name: By: Date approved by Board: 3/19/19 Bob Solari, Chairman ATTEST: Jeffrey R. Smith, Clerk of Court and Comptroller By: Deputy Clerk Approved as to Form and Legal Sufficiency n Approved William K. DeBraal Jason E. Brown Deputy County Attomey County Administrator 2 42 Exhibit "A" Legal Description & Sketch for a Stormwater Easement at the Gifford Youth Achievement Center Site Indian River County, Florida Sheet 1 of 2 Not Valid Without All Sheets SURVEYORS.. NOTES 1) THE BASIS OF BEAR/NGS IS THE EAST LINE OF SECTION 21 WHICH BEARS S00'10'46"W. 2) THIS SKETCH EXISTS SOLELY FOR 7HE PURPOSE OF ILLUSTRATING THE LEGAL DESCRIPTION TO WHICH IT IS ATTACHED. 3) ALL DIMENSIONS ARE CALCULATED UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 4) THIS SKETCH MEL'S 7HE STANDARD PRAC77CES FOR SURVEYING AS SET FORTH BY THE FLORIDA BOARD OF PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYORS IN CHAPTER 5J-17, FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE, PURSUANT TO SECTION 472.027, FLORIDA STATUTES LEGEND R/W RIGHT-OF-WAY NO. NUMBER R RADIUS L LENGTH CH CHORD DISTANCE CB CHORD BEARING PSM PROFESSIONAL SURVEYOR AND MAPPER d DELTA N NORTH S SOUTH E EAST W WEST GYAC GIFFORD YOUTH ACHIEVEMENT CENTER LEGAL DESCRIPTION COMMENCING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF TRACT 9, SECTION 21, TOWNSHIP 32 SOUTH, RANGE 39 EAST, THENCE S0070'46"W, ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID SECTION 21; A DISTANCE OF 30.00 FEET TO AN INTERSECT70N WITH THE SOUTH RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF THE LATERAL A-8 CANAL; THENCE N89 46'19"W ALONG SAID SOUTH RIGHT OF WAY UNE, A DISTANCE OF 61289 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE EXISTING GIFFORD YOUTH ACHIEVEMENT CENTER LEASE; THENCE SOUTH 0070'46" WEST ALONG TT -IE SAID GIFFORD YOUTH ACHIEVEMENT CENTER LEASE BOUNDARY A DISTANCE OF 40.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THE HEREIN DESCRIBED EASEMENT THENCE CON77NUE SOUTHERLY ALONG SAID LEASE BOUNDARY LINE, A DISTANCE OF 10.00 FEET; THENCE CONTINUE ALONG SAID LEASE LINE SOUTH 22'49'08" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 38.15 FEET; THENCE, LEAVING SAID LEASE BOUNDARY, NORTH 48'47'57" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 55.00 FEET THENCE NORTH 0853'43" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 15.00 FEET; ]HENCE SOUTH 76'23'2B" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 25.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. CONTAINING 779.42 SQUARE FEET OR 0.0179 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. 0__...a: Ie1N "This is NOT a Boundary Survey" Drawn by: BMM Checked by File nameDate Scale Drawing Name DMT 7158 12/25/19 NONE 7158 -Pond -ease Masteller, Moler & Taylor, Inc. PROFESSIONAL SURVEYORS AND MAPPERS LAND SURVEYING BUSINESS #4644 1655 27th Street, Suite 2 Vero Beach, Florida 32960 Phone: (772) 564-8050 Fax:. (772) 794-0647 NOT VALID WITHOUT THE SIGNATURE AND THE ORIGINA SED SEAL OF A FLORIDA LICENRVEYD MAPPE AVID TAYLOR P.L.S. 5243 43 Exhibit "A" Legal Description & Sketch for a Stormwater Easement at the Gafford Youth Achievement Center Site Indian River County., Florida Sheet 2 of 2 Not Valid Without All Sheets NW CORNER OF GYAC LEASE S76232'280;5 25.00'E N08 53'43"E 15.00' N48'47'57"W 55;00' POINT OF COMMENCEMENT NE CORNER TRACT 9, SECTION 21—T32S—R39E LATERAL A-8 CANAL (30' R/W) 50010'46"W 30.00' S0010'46'41/ 40.00' N89 46'19"W 612.89' POINT OF BEGINNING lig Ell -S0070'461W 10 00' SUBJECT STORMWATER EASEMENT V000LF MODULAR 522'49'08"E 38.15' GYAC LEASE BOUNDARY \� STEMWALL LOCATION LEGAL DESCRIPTION & SKETCH "This is NOT a Boundary Survez" MULTI -STORY CBS BUILDING SOUTH R/W LINE LATERAL A-8 CANAL j 50.00 hI Drawn by: Checked by File name BMM DMT 7158 12/25/19 1 Scale - Drawing Name 1"=80' 7158 -pond -ease Mastelier, Moler & Taylor, Inc: PROFESSIONAL SURVEYORS AND MAPPERS LAND SURVEYING BUSINESS #4644 1655 27th Street, Suite 2 Vero Beach, Florida 329,60 Phone: (772) 56.4-8050 Fax: (772) 794-0647 NOT VALID WITHOUT THE SIGNATURE AND THE ORIGINAL :_ ISED SEAL OF A FLORIDA UCENS ,' VEYOR AND MAI'PE AVID TAYLOR P.L.S. 5243 RESOLUTION NO. 2019- A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, APPROVING A THIRD AMENDMENT TO LEASE AGREEMENT WITH THE GIFFORD YOUTH ACHIEVEMENT CENTER, INC., FOR COUNTY OWNED PROPERTY KNOWN AS THE GIFFORD YOUTH ACHIEVEMENT CENTER. WHEREAS, the Gifford Youth Activity Center, Inc. n/k/a the Gifford Youth Achievement Center, Inc. ("GYAC"), and the Board of County Commissioners (Board) entered into a Lease Agreement for County -owned property located at 4875 43`d Avenue, Vero Beach, Indian River County, Florida ("Property") on November 19, 2002, for a term of 40 -years, at a rental rate of $1.00 per year for use as an activity center for area youths; and WHEREAS, on January 20, 2015, the Board amended and extended the Lease Agreement to a term of 99 -years to continue their use of the Property; and WHEREAS, On March 6, 2018, the Board approved a Second Amendment to Lease Agreement for GYAC to construct a one story classroom building on the Property that in the future could be expanded to add a second floor and to construct such future improvements with the prior consent of the Board; and WHEREAS, during the construction process, it was discovered that and additional 780 square feet (0.02 acres) needed to be added to the Lease Agreement to be used for stormwater treatment; and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners finds that such use of the County owned Property promotes the County's interests and welfare; and WHEREAS, the GYAC is a Florida not for profit corporation and a corporation organized exclusively for charitable and educational purposes as set forth in section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA: 1. In accordance with Florida Statutes §125.38, the Board finds that: a. The Gifford Youth Achievement Center, Inc. ("GYAC") has made proper application as required for a Third Amendment to the lease of the Property; b. the 0.02acre Property is not needed for County purposes; c. The use of the Property for stormwater treatment for the a classroom and youth achievement center promotes the County interests and welfare; 2. The Board approves and authorizes the Chairman to execute the Third Amendment to Lease Agreement between the Board and the GYAC, adding an additional 0.02 acres to the Property for stormwater treatment, described in the attached Exhibit "A". 3. The Third Amendment to Lease Agreement is entered into pursuant to the authority of Florida Statutes §125.01 and §125.38. 1 45 RESOLUTION NO. 2019- - The foregoing Resolution was offered by Commissioner and seconded by Commissioner , and, upon being put to a vote, the vote was as follows: Chairman Bob Solari Vice Chairman Susan Adams CommissionerJoseph E. Flescher Commissioner Peter D. O'Bryan Commissioner Tim Zorc The Chairman thereupon declared the Resolution duly passed and adopted this 26th day of March, 2019. Attest: Jeffrey R. Smith, Clerk of INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA Court and Comptroller BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS By Deputy Clerk Approved: Jason E. Brown County Administrator Approved as to form and legal sufficiency: liam K. D-Braal Deputy County Attorney 2 By Bob Solari, Chairman 46 Exhibit "A" Legal Description & .Sketch for a Stormwater Easement at the Gifford Youth Achievement Center Site Indian River County, Florida Sheet I of 2 Not Valid Without All Sheets SURVEYORS .NOTES 1) THE BASIS OF BEARINGS IS 771E EAST LINE OF SECTION 2t WHICH BEARS S00'10'46"W. 2) THIS SKETCH EXISTS SOLELY FOR THE PURPOSE OF ILLUSTRATING THE LEGAL DESCRIPTION TO WHICH IT IS ATTACHED. 3) ALL DIMENSIONS ARE CALCULATED UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 4) THIS SKETCH MEETS THESTANDARD PRACTICES FOR SURVEYING AS SET FORTH BY THE FLORIDA BOARD OF PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYORS IN CHAPTER 5J-17, FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE, PURSUANT TO .SECTION 472.027, FLORIDA STATUTES. LEGEND R/W RIGHT-OF-WAY NO. NUMBER R RADIUS L LENGTH CH CHORD DISTANCE CB CHORD BEARING PSM PROFESSIONAL SURVEYOR AND MAPPER d DELTA N NORTH S SOUTH E EAST W WEST GYAC GIFFORD YOUTH ACHIEVEMENT CENTER LEGAL DESCRIP710N COMMENCING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF TRACT 9, SECTION 21, TOWNSHIP 32 SOUTH, RANGE 39 EAST THENCE 50070'46"W, -ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID SEC770N 21; A DISTANCE OF 30.00 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION NTH THE SOUTH RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF 7HE LATERAL A-8 CANAL; THENCE N89'46'19"W ALONG SAID SOUTH RIGHT OF WAY LINE, A DISTANCE OF 61289 FEET TO 7HE NORTHWEST CORNER OF 7HE EXISTING GIFFORD YOUTH ACHIEVEMENT CENTER LEASE; THENCE SOUTH 0070'46" WEST ALONG THE SAID GIFFORD YOUTH ACHIEVEMENT CENTER LEASE BOUNDARY A DISTANCE OF 40.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THE HEREIN DESCRIBED EASEMENT, THENCE CON77NUE SOUTHERLY ALONG SA/D LEASE BOUNDARY LINE, A DISTANCE OF 10.00 FEET, THENCE CON77NUE ALONG SAID LEASE LINE SOUTH 22'49'08" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 38.15 .FEET THENCE, LEAVING SAID LEASE BOUNDARY, NORTH 48'47'57" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 55.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 0853'43" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 15.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 76'23'28" EAST A DISTANCE OF 25.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING CONTAINING 779.42 SQUARE FEET OR 0,0179 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. H s C„ I "This is NOT a Boundary Survey Drawn by: BMM Checked by File name I DateScale Drawing Name DMT 7158 2/25/19 j NONE 17158 -Pond -ease Masteller, Moler & Taylor, .Inc. PROFESSIONAL SURVEYORS AND MAPPERS LAND SURVEYING BUSINESS #4644 1655 27th Street, Suite 2 Vero Beach, Florida 32960 Phone: (772) 564-8050 Fax: (772) 794-0647 NOT VALID INITHOUT THE SIGNATURE ANb THE ORIGINA. ` SED SEAL OF A FLORIDA UDEN RVEYD MAPP AVID TAYLOR P.L.S. 5243 47 Exhibit "A" Legal Description & Sketch for a Stormwater Easement at the Gifford Youth Achievement Center Site Indian River County, .Florida Sheet 2 of 2 Not Valid Without All Sheets NW CORNER OF GYAC LEASE — — _ — — — _ — _ _ — LATERAL A-8 CANAL (30' R/W) 30070'46"W 30.00' POINT OF COMMENCEMENT NE CORNER TRACT 9, SECTION 21—T32S—R39E S76 23'28 E 25.00' N0853'43"E 15.00' N4847'571W. 55.00' SUSPECT STORMWATER EASEMENT GYA,C LEASE BOUNDARY 50070'46"W 40.00' N89 46'19"W 612.89' POINT OF BEGINNING gig E:g 50070'46"W 10.00' VODUL4 MODULAR 522'49'08"E 38.15' STEMWALL LOCATION MULTI -STORY CBS BUILDING SOUTH R/W LINE LATERAL A-8 CANAL L AL _ . SCRIP lON& S TCH "This is NOT a Boundary Survey" Drawn by: Checked .by File name I Date I Scale . Drawing Name BMM DMT 7158 2/25/19 1"_80° 7158 -pond -ease Masteller, Moler & Taylor, Inc. PROFESSIONAL SURVEYORS AND MAPPERS LAND SURVEYING BUSINESS #4644 1655 27th Street, Suite 2 Vero Beach, Florida 32960 Phone: (772) 564-8050 Fax: (772) 794-0647 NOT VALID WITHOUT THE SIGNATURE AND THE ORIGINAL SED SEAL OF A FLORIDA LICENS VEYOR. AND MAPPE AVID TAYLOR P.L.S. 52433 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA AGENDA ITEM Assistant County Administrator / Department of General Services Parks & Conservation Resources Division CONSENT BCC Meeting 03-26.2019 Date: To: March 15, 2019 The Honorable Board of County Commissioners Thru: Jason E. Brown, County Administrator Michael C. Zito, Assistant County Administrator Kristin Daniels, Budget Director Kevin Kirwin, Director, Parks & Conservation Resources From: Beth Powell, Assistant Director, Park & Conservation Resources Subject: Award of Bid 2019042 — Jones' Pier Fruit Stand Replica DESCRIPTIONS AND CONDITIONS: On August 14, 2018, the Board of County Commissioners executed a State of Florida Division of Historical Resources Small Matching Grant for the Jones' Pier Conservation Area Fruit Stand and related educational signage. On the same date, the Board also approved Work Order #3 to MBV Engineering, Inc. ("MBV") for the architectural and engineering design for the Fruit Stand. The reconstruction of the Fruit Stand is a part of the larger improvements on the Jones' Pier Conservation Area which includes public access facilities, the wetland creation and hammock restoration. The Fruit Stand will serve as a key interpretive feature on the conservation area providing visitors with educational material about the site and adjacent features including the Indian River Lagoon and Historic Jungle Trail. MBV completed the design, engineering and bid specifications for the Fruit Stand in January 2019 and the design was approved by the Division of Historical Resources. The construction of the Fruit Stand and other grant obligations must be completed by June 30, 2019, in order to qualify for reimbursement. ANALYSIS: Two bids were submitted, however, one was disqualified for failure to sign the bid form. The sole responsive and responsible bid was provided by Indian River Docks, LLC. The budget for the reconstruction of the Fruit Stand is $25,000 plus additional costs related to site survey and site preparation. The qualifying bid by Indian River Docks, LLC in the amount of $23,122.50 has met all necessary purchasing requirements and is registered with the Building Division. Indian River Docks has successfully completed other projects for the County, including the Archie Smith Fish House Dock. 49 FUNDING: On December 4, 2018, the Board of County Commissioners approved an update to the 5 Year Capital Improvements Program for the period of FY 2018/19-2022/2023. Within this plan, $27,550 is identified in FY2018/19 for the Division of Historical Resources Grant (approved by the BCC on 8/14/18) with a County match of $27,550. The match for this grant is funded through the Jones' Pier Preserve Public Access Improvements/Windsor Properties Exchange Donation. Funding for the match as well as other improvements to the site is available in the following account: GL #00421072-066510-18010 Windsor Properties Exchange Donation RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board award bid number 2019042 to Indian River Docks, LLC. Staff further recommends that the Board approve the sample agreement and authorize the Chairman to execute it after review and approval by the County Attorney as to form and legal sufficiency, and after approval of the required insurance by the Risk Manager. ATTACHMENTS: Sample Agreement — Bid Number 2019042 APPROVED AGENDA ITEM FOR MARCH 26, 2019 50 2019042 Jones Pier Fruit Stand Sample Agreement THIS AGREEMENT is by and between INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, a Political Subdivision of the State of Florida organized and existing under the Laws of the State of Florida, (hereinafter called OWNER) and (hereinafter called CONTRACTOR). OWNER and CONTRACTOR, in consideration of the mutual covenants hereinafter set forth, agree as follows: ARTICLE 1- WORK CONTRACTOR shall complete all Work as specified or indicated in the Contract Documents. The Work is generally described as follows: Site preparation and construction of a fruit stand based on the Architectural Plans and Engineering Drawings included as part of the bid package. ARTICLE 2 -THE PROJECT The Project for which the Work under the Contract Documents may be the whole or only a part is generally described as follows: Project Name: Jones Pier Fruit Stand Replica Construction Bid Number: 2019042 Project Address: 7700 Jungle Trail, Vero Beach, FL 32963 ARTICLE 3 - CONTRACT TIMES 3.1 Time of the Essence A. All time limits for Milestones, if any, Substantial Completion, and completion and readiness for final payment as stated in the specifications are of the essence of the Agreement. 3.2 Days to Achieve Substantial Completion, Final Completion and Final Payment A. The Work will be completed and ready for final payment on or before June 15, 2019. ARTICLE 4 - CONTRACT PRICE 4.1 OWNER shall pay CONTRACTOR for completion of the Work an amount in current funds equal to the sum of the amounts determined pursuant to paragraph 4.01.A and summarized in paragraph 4.01.B, below: A. For all Work, at the prices stated in CONTRACTOR's Bid, attached hereto as an exhibit. B. THE CONTRACT SUM subject to additions and deductions provided in the Contract Documents: Page 21 of 31 51 2019042 Jones Pier Fruit Stand Numerical Amount: $ Written Amount: ARTICLE 5 - PAYMENT PROCEDURES 5.1 Method of Payment Owner shall make only one payment for the entire amount of the contract when the work has been completed. Upon a determination of satisfactory completion, the COUNTY Project Manager will authorize payment to be made. All payments for services shall be made to the CONTRACTOR by the COUNTY in accordance with the Local Government Prompt Payment Act, as may be amended from time to time (Section 218.70, Florida Statutes, et seq.). 5.2 Acceptance of Final Payment as Release The acceptance by the CONTRACTOR of final payment shall be and shall operate as a release to the OWNER from all claims and all liability to the CONTRACTOR other than claims in stated amounts as may be specifically excepted by the CONTRACTOR for all things done or furnished in connection with the work under this Agreement and for every act and neglect of the OWNER and others relating to or arising out of the work. Any payment, however, final or otherwise, shall not release the CONTRACTOR or its sureties from any obligations under this Agreement, the Invitation to Bid or the Public Construction Bond. ARTICLE 6 - INDEMNIFICATION 6.01 CONTRACTOR shall indemnify and hold harmless the OWNER, and its officers and employees, from liabilities, damages, losses and costs, including, but not limited to, reasonable attorney's fees, to the extent caused by the negligence, recklessness, or intentional wrongful misconduct of the CONTRACTOR and persons employed or utilized by the CONTRACTOR in the performance of the Work. ARTICLE 7 - CONTRACTOR'S REPRESENTATIONS 7.1 In order to induce OWNER to enter into this Agreement CONTRACTOR makes the following representations: A. CONTRACTOR has examined and carefully studied the Contract Documents and the other related data identified in the Invitation to Bid documents. B. CONTRACTOR has visited the Site and become familiar with and is satisfied as to the general, local, and Site conditions that may affect cost, progress, and performance of the Work. C. CONTRACTOR is familiar with and is satisfied as to all federal, state, and local Laws and Regulations that may affect cost, progress, and performance of the Work. Page 22 of 31 52 2019042 Jones Pier Fruit Stand D. CONTRACTOR has obtained and carefully studied (or assumes responsibility for having done so) all additional or supplementary examinations, investigations, explorations, tests, studies, and data concerning conditions (surface, subsurface, and Underground Facilities) at or contiguous to the Site which may affect cost, progress, or performance of the Work or which relate to any aspect of the means, methods, techniques, sequences, and procedures of construction to be employed by CONTRACTOR, including applying the specific means, methods, techniques, sequences, and procedures of construction, if any, expressly required by the Contract Documents to be employed by CONTRACTOR, and safety precautions and programs incident thereto. E. CONTRACTOR does not consider that any further examinations, investigations, explorations, tests, studies, or data are necessary for the performance of the Work at the Contract Price, within the Contract Times, and in accordance with the other terms and conditions of the Contract Documents. F. CONTRACTOR is aware of the general nature of work to be performed by OWNER and others at the Site that relates to the Work as indicated in the Contract Documents. G. CONTRACTOR has correlated the information known to CONTRACTOR, information and observations obtained from visits to the Site, reports and drawings identified in the Contract Documents, and all additional examinations, investigations, explorations, tests, studies, and data with the Contract Documents. H. CONTRACTOR has given OWNER written notice of all conflicts, errors, ambiguities, or discrepancies that CONTRACTOR has discovered in the Contract Documents, and the written resolution thereof by OWNER is acceptable to CONTRACTOR. I. The Contract Documents are generally sufficient to indicate and convey understanding of all terms and conditions for performance and furnishing of the Work. ARTICLE 8 - CONTRACT DOCUMENTS 8.1 Contents A. The Contract Documents consist of the following: (1) This Agreement (pages 1 to_, inclusive); (2) Notice to Proceed (3) Public Construction Bond (pages to , inclusive); (4) Certificate of Liability Insurance (5) Invitation to Bid 2019042 (6) Addenda (numbers to , inclusive); (7) CONTRACTOR'S Bid Form (pages to , inclusive); Page 23 of 31 53 2019042 Jones Pier Fruit Stand (8) Bid Bond (pages inclusive); (9) Drug Free Workplace Form (pages to , inclusive) (10)Sworn Statement Under Section 105.08, Indian River County Code, on Disclosure of Relationships (pages to , inclusive); (11) Certification Regarding Prohibition Against Contracting with Scrutinized Companies (12)The following which may be delivered or issued on or after the Effective Date of the Agreement and are not attached hereto: a) Written Amendments; b) Work Change Directives; c) Change Order(s). ARTICLE 9 - MISCELLANEOUS 9.1 Terms A. Terms used in this Agreement will have the meanings indicated in the Invitation to Bid. 9.2 Assignment of Contract A. No assignment by a party hereto of any rights under or interests in the Agreement will be binding on another party hereto without the written consent of the party sought to be bound; and, specifically but without limitation, moneys that may become due and moneys that are due may not be assigned without such consent (except to the extent that the effect of this restriction may be limited by law), and unless specifically stated to the contrary in any written consent to an assignment, no assignment will release or discharge the assignor from any duty or responsibility under the Contract Documents. 9.3 Successors and Assigns A. OWNER and CONTRACTOR each binds itself, its partners, successors, assigns, and legal representatives to the other party hereto, its partners, successors, assigns, and legal representatives in respect to all covenants, agreements, and obligations contained in the Contract Documents. 9.4 Severability A. Any provision or part of the Contract Documents held to be void or unenforceable under any Law or Regulation shall be deemed stricken, and all remaining provisions shall continue to be valid and binding upon OWNER and CONTRACTOR, who agree that the Contract Documents shall be Page 24 of 31 54 2019042 Jones Pier Fruit Stand reformed to replace such stricken provision or part thereof with a valid and enforceable provision that comes as close as possible to expressing the intention of the stricken provision. 9.5 Venue A. This Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of Florida. Venue for any lawsuit brought by either party against the other party or otherwise arising out of this Agreement shall be in Indian River County, Florida, or, in the event of a federal jurisdiction, in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida. 9.6 Public Records Compliance A. Indian River County is a public agency subject to Chapter 119, Florida Statutes. The Contractor shall comply with Florida's Public Records Law. Specifically, the Contractor shall: (1) Keep and maintain public records required by the County to perform the service. (2) Upon request from the County's Custodian of Public Records, provide the County with a copy of the requested records or allow the records to be inspected or copied within a reasonable time at a cost that does not exceed the cost provided in Chapter 119 or as otherwise provided by law. (3) Ensure that public records that are exempt or confidential and exempt from public records disclosure requirements are not disclosed except as authorized by law for the duration of the contract term and following completion of the contract if the contractor does not transfer the records to the County. (4) Upon completion of the contract, transfer, at no cost, to the County all public records in possession of the Contractor or keep and maintain public records required by the County to perform the service. If the Contractor transfers all public records to the County upon completion of the contract, the Contractor shall destroy any duplicate public records that are exempt or confidential and exempt from public records disclosure requirements. If the contractor keeps and maintains public records upon completion of the contract, the Contractor shall meet all applicable requirements for retaining public records. All records stored electronically must be provided to the County, upon request from the Custodian of Public Records, in a format that is compatible with the information technology systems of the County. . IF THE CONTRACTOR HAS QUESTIONS REGARDING THE APPLICATION OF CHAPTER 119, FLORIDA STATUTES, TO THE CONTRACTOR'S DUTY TO PROVIDE PUBLIC RECORDS RELATING TO THIS CONTRACT, CONTACT THE CUSTODIAN OF PUBLIC RECORDS AT: (772) 226-1424 Dublicrecords(ciirceov.com Indian River County Office of the County Attorney 1801 27th Street Page 25 of 31 55 2019042 Jones Pier Fruit Stand Vero Beach, FL 32960 C. Failure of the Contractor to comply with these requirements shall be a material breach of this Agreement. Article 10: TERMINATION OF CONTRACT A. The occurrence of any of the following shall constitute a default by CONTRACTOR and shall provide the OWNER with a right to terminate this Contract in accordance with this Article, in addition to pursuing any other remedies which the OWNER may have under this Contract or under law: (1) if in the OWNER's opinion CONTRACTOR is improperly performing work or violating any provision(s) of the Contract Documents; (2) if CONTRACTOR neglects or refuses to correct defective work or replace defective parts or equipment, as directed by the Engineer pursuant to an inspection; (3) if in the OWNER's opinion CONTRACTOR's work is being unnecessarily delayed and will not be finished within the prescribed time; (4) if CONTRACTOR assigns this Contract or any money accruing thereon or approved thereon; or (5) if CONTRACTOR abandons the work, is adjudged bankrupt, or if he makes a general assignment for the benefit of his creditors, or if a trustee or receiver is appointed for CONTRACTOR or for any of his property. B. OWNER shall, before terminating the Contract for any of the foregoing reasons, notify CONTRACTOR in writing of the grounds for termination and provide CONTRACTOR with ten (10) calendar days to cure the default to the reasonable satisfaction of the OWNER. C. If the CONTRACTOR fails to correct or cure within the time provided in the preceding Sub -Article B, OWNER may terminate this Contract by notifying CONTRACTOR in writing. Upon receiving such notification, CONTRACTOR shall immediately cease all work hereunder and shall forfeit any further right to possess or occupy the site or any materials thereon; provided, however, that the OWNER may authorize CONTRACTOR to restore any work sites. D. The CONTRACTOR shall be liable for: (1) any new cost incurred by the OWNER in soliciting bids or proposals for and letting a new contract; and (2) the difference between the cost of completing the new contract and the cost of completing this Contract; (3) any court costs and attorney's fees associated with any lawsuit undertaken by OWNER to enforce its rights herein. E. TERMINATION FOR CONVENIENCE: OWNER may at any time and for any reason terminate CONTRACTOR's services and work for OWNER's convenience. Upon receipt of notice of such termination CONTRACTOR shall, unless the notice directs otherwise, immediately discontinue the work and immediately cease ordering of any materials, labor, equipment, facilities, or supplies in connection with the performance of this Contract. Upon such termination Contractor shall be entitled to payment only as follows: Page 26 of 31 56 2019042 Jones Pier Fruit Stand (1) the actual cost of the work completed in conformity with this Contract and the specifications; plus, (2) such other costs actually incurred by CONTRACTOR as are permitted by the prime contract and approved by the OWNER. Contractor shall not be entitled to any other claim for compensation or damages against the County in the event of such termination. F. TERMINIATION IN REGARDS TO F.S. 287.135: CONTRACTOR certifies that it and those related entities of respondent as defined by Florida law are not on the Scrutinized Companies that Boycott Israel List, created pursuant to s. 215.4725 of the Florida Statutes, and are not engaged in a boycott of Israel. In addition, if this agreement is for goods or services of one million dollars or more, CONTRACTOR certifies that it and those related entities of respondent as defined above by Florida law are not on the Scrutinized Companies with Activities in Sudan List or the Scrutinized Companies with Activities in the Iran Petroleum Energy Sector List, created pursuant to Section 215.473 of the Florida Statutes and are not engaged in business operations in Cuba or Syria. OWNER may terminate this Contract if CONTRACTOR is found to have submitted a false certification as provided under section 287.135(5), Florida Statutes, been placed on the Scrutinized Companies with Activities in Sudan List or the Scrutinized Companies with Activities in the Iran Petroleum Energy Sector List, or been engaged in business operations in Cuba or Syria, as defined by section 287.135, Florida Statutes. OWNER may terminate this Contract if CONTRACTOR, including all wholly owned subsidiaries, majority-owned subsidiaries, and parent companies, that exist for the purpose of making profit, is found to have been placed on the Scrutinized Companies that Boycott Israel List or is engaged in a boycott of Israel as set forth in section 215.4725, Florida Statutes. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, OWNER and CONTRACTOR have signed this Agreement in duplicate. One counterpart each has been delivered to OWNER and CONTRACTOR. All portions of the Contract Documents have been signed or identified by OWNER and CONTRACTOR or on their behalf. Page 27 of 31 57 2019042 Jones Pier Fruit Stand This Agreement will be effective on , 20 (the date the Agreement is approved by the Indian River County Board of County Commissioners, which is the Effective Date of the Agreement). OWNER: CONTRACTOR: INDIAN RIVER COUNTY By: By: Bob Solari, Chairman (Contractor) By: (CORPORATE SEAL) Jason E. Brown, County Administrator APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGAL SUFFICIENCY: By: Dylan Reingold, County Attorney Jeffrey R. Smith, Clerk of Court and Comptroller Attest: Attest Address for giving notices: License No. (Where applicable) Deputy Clerk (SEAL) Agent for service of process: Designated Representative: Name: Designated Representative: Title: Name: Address: Title: Phone Address: Email Page 28 of 31 Phone: Email: (If CONTRACTOR is a corporation or a partnership, attach evidence of authority to sign.) 58 Consent Agenda - B.C.C. 3.26.19 Office of INDIAN RIVER COUNTY ATTORNEY Dylan Reingold, County Attorney William K. DeBraal, Deputy County Attorney Kate Pingolt Cotner, Assistant County Attorney MEMORANDUM TO: Board of County Commissioners FROM: Dylan Reingold, County Attorney DATE: March 13, 2019 SUBJECT: Release of Demolition Lien BACKGROUND. On August 18, 2015, Indian River County recorded the attached lien on the property located at 13185 76`h Court (the "Property") for the demolition of a nuisance structure. The lien was for $6,715.40. The lien noted that the lien would accrue interest at a rate of 5.75%. In December 2017, Red Bird Investments, LLC purchased the Property via a tax deed sale. Recently, Red Bird Investments, LLC reached out to me stating that they were unaware of the lien. Initially, Red Bird Investments, LLC indicated they wanted to have the lien reduced by fifty percent. I explained that since the lien was for actual costs expended by Indian River County, staff was not willing to support the request, but that staff would support a waiver of the interest accrued. Red Bird Investments, LLC was agreeable to the waiver of just the interest. The County Attorney's Office recommends that the Indian River County Board of County Commissioners ("Board") waive the interest, so long as the lien of $6,715.40 is paid. Once paid, the County Attorney's Office recommends that the Board authorize the County Attorney's Office to prepare a release or satisfaction of the lien. FUNDING. Lien proceeds totaling $6,715.40 will be deposited into MSTU Fund/Other Miscellaneous Revenue account number 004038-369900. The costs of recording the satisfaction of the lien will be borne by Red Bird Investments, LLC. RECOMMENDATION. The County Attorney's Office recommends that the Indian River County Board of County Commissioners waive the interest, so long as the lien of $6,715.40 is paid. Once paid, the County Attorney's Office recommends that the Board authorize the County Attorney's Office to prepare a release or satisfaction of the lien. ATTACHMENT Lien C.IUsersllegistarWppDatalLocallTemp\BCL Technologiesle yPDF 81QBCL@D80DDBlEIQBCLQD8ODDBIE docs 59 Page 1 of 1 3120150050788 RECORDED IN THE RECORDS OF JEFFREY R. SMITH, CLERK OF CIRCUIT COURT INDIAN RIVER CO FL BK: 2871 PG: 2137, 8/20/2015 3:59 PM This document was prepared by and should be returned to: Indian River County Attorney's Office 1801 27'" Street Vero Beach, FL 32960 772.226-1425 LIEN THIS LIEN, filed the 1 8th day of August , 2015, by INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, pursuant to the authority of the Code of Indian River County, Section 403.08, Property Maintenance Code, for costs incurred by Indian River County, Florida, to remove nuisance structures from property located within Indian River County, and described as follows: Lot 17, INDIAN RIVER TWIN ESTATES SUBDIVISION, Jean's Unit, according to the Plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book 8, at Page 31, of the Public Records of Indian River County, Florida. Parcel No. 30-38-36-00004-0010-00017.0 The name of the record owner of the above-described property is: Linda Jackson THIS LIEN is filed against the real property to secure the payment of Six Thousand Seven Hundred Fifteen and 40/100. Dollars ($6,715.40), for the cost of demolition and removal of the nuisance structures. THIS LIEN shall, from the date of filing, accrue interest at the rate of five and three-quarters percent (5.75%) per annum, until the total amount, including interest, has been paid. INDIA COUNTY, FLORIDA Wesley S. Da is, Chairman Board of County Commissionero ATTEST: Jeffrey R. Smith, Clerk of zy. Circuit Court and Com .''oll: r BCC approved: August 18, 201392': Bv: Deputy Cler STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF INDIAN RIVER APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGAL St* BY DEPUTYYCOOU rt1PArr9(MIEY The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 18th day of At1��r , 2015, by Wesley S. Davis, Chairman of the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida, who is personally known to me. onlitusik#00YLPi ,tf, NOTARY PUBLIC: * r `'I = Signature • s°• L°$* Printed name: Misty ' Pursel "tik #FF ;oma; Commission No.: FF 65450 Ng'� �,,, 4'$ Commission Expiration: SEAL: 4sfr;r:ky`.3.T4 `` p 1/11/18 v Q.,C ••. COaNTY ..OP •: 60 http://ori.indian-river.org///Document/GetDocumentForPrintPNG/?request=AQAAANCM... 3/13/2019 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA MEMORANDUM TO: Jason E. Brown; County Administrator THROUGH: Stan Boling, AICP; Community Development Director FROM: John W. McCoy, AICP; Chief, Current Development DATE: March 14, 2019 SUBJECT: Ray Sheltra's Request for Affidavit of Exemption Approval with County Acceptance of Limited Access Easement [AOE-18-09-03 / 2002100140-82208] It is requested that the data herein presented be given formal consideration by the Board of County Commissioners at its regular meeting of March 26, 2019. DESCRIPTION, CONDITIONS, & ANALYSIS: Carter Associates, Inc., on behalf of Raymond W. Sheltra, has submitted an application for an Affidavit of Exemption (AOE) to be known as the Sheltra Affidavit of Exemption. The project consists of a total of 3 lots on 17.53 acres, and is located on the south side of 49th Street, just west of 66th Avenue [see attachment 2]. The property is zoned A-1, Agricultural -1 (up to 1 unit/5 acres), and has an AG -1, Agricultural -1 (up to 1 unit/5 acres) future land use designation. During the development review process for the subject AOE, Public Works staff indicated that a limited access easement would be required along the project's 49th Street frontage, except for the project's approved shared driveway common entrance location on the east side of the property, and the existing driveway located on the west side of the property [see attachment 3]. The limited access easement is required in order to control and/or limit the number of driveway connections and/or culvert crossings on 49th Street, and is proposed to be dedicated to the Board. In essence, the proposed limited access easement will allow the County to enforce common use of the limited common entrance connections to 49th Street to serve all 3 lots. A typical AOE can be approved at the staff level. However, because the subject AOE proposes to dedicate a 5' wide limited access easement to the Board, the Board must consent to the acceptance of dedication of the limited access easement. Upon acceptance by the Board, staff can concurrently approve the subject AOE and have the appropriate documents recorded in the public record. The applicant has submitted an AOE layout that shows the required limited access easement to be dedicated to the Board. The layout has been reviewed by staff, including Public Works, and is acceptable. The Board is now to consider acceptance of the dedication of the limited access easement from the Sheltra Affidavit of Exemption, as part of the AOE approval. C:\Users\legistar\AppData\Local\Temp\BCL Technologies\easyPDF 8\@BCL@400E7F02\@BCL@400E7F02.docx 61 RECOMMENDATION: Based on the analysis, staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners accept the dedication of the limited access easement and authorize the chairman to execute the subject Affidavit of Exemption. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Application 2. Location Map 3. Affidavit of Exemption Layout C:\Users\legistar\AppData\Local\Temp\BCL Technologies\easyPDF 8\@BCL@400E7F02\@BCL@400E7F02.docx 6� i L i Uamrzr 0.? r r fr.1= .:t? 1 j\T !?ORPI PROJECT NANO (FLirpr7): Rey Shelin 3 -Lot Affidavit of Exemption Pre-app1.catione"e ra" ct name & uunbor: „fot,1100figi jf a , atema Computer assigned praje t#: AVM 1,Da/40 WO? Plan A013. t 8-09-013 OWNER: (PLEASE NT) Raymond W. Sheltra NAME 6.825 49th Sweat ADDRESS Vero Beach, FL 32967 Crt ` , STATE, M' (772) x.3-81 61 PIENv,:Il ay a@sheitracontracting.com EMAIL ADDRESS Raymond Sheltrs CONTACT PERSON AGENT (?LEASE PRINT) NAmE ADDRESS CITY, STATE, ZIP PHONE NUMBER EMAII, ADDRESS CONTACT PERSON PoJ4 C-4 CS-11-1-atfi U SIGNATURE OF OWNER OR AGENT PROW"' ENCU' ER: (PLEA ERNI) Caller Asso-C ates; inc. NI -2M 1706 21st Street ADDRESS Vero Beach, FL 32960 cnY,STATE, zip ._ (772)5624191 PROJECT SURVEYOR: (PLEASE EMIT) Care Associates, inc. NAM3 1708 21st Street ADDRESS Vero Bach, Fl_ 32960 CTr'Y, STATE, EP (772)562-4191 PHONE NUNDt PHONE NUDZER johnb©crteFasso .co davidU©c rterassoc.com EMA , ADDRESS E isAE. ADDRESS John i- . Slum, P.E. David E. Luethj , PSS+ CONTACT PERSON CONTACT PERSON 130127'" Steel, Clem Beaoi FL 32950 F:itas acnityDswelopmenlAPRICA :pp1kit I all AAid avkaPEsc trcaApp.KP Ref iemdArt 12016 Page 1 coATTACHMENT 1 SITE TAX IMPS: M-39-19-00001-0090-0007.0 P7.OJEC`T USE: Single -Family Residential IS ALL OR A PORTION OF TBE PROJECT IN AN'ENVLIONMENTALLY SSNSMVEn AREA AS ADDRESSED 114 THE PROJECT PRE -APPLICATION CONFERENCE? YES 1 - . NO r- ZONING: A-1 FLUB: A - i TOTAL (GROSS) ACREAGE OF PAR(RL: 17.53 ARBA OF DEVELOPMENT (NET) ACREAGE: 17.53 • TOTAL NUMBER OF LOTS: 3 MIS= (UNITS PER ACE): 1 / 5.84 **PLEASE F1L O JT APPLICATION SUB1V SS_CN .«b. r�ITIDAVrr OF EX re :'"ION /i.IT ICA 7ON SSTh3MI.JS. IO' N lam. ' rYCLIST j TATER (mark "N/A'= v.tere applicable) 1. Formal Pre-Apr.lication Code ,e Field 2. $1,000.00 Application Fee TSTA* 3. Completes Affidavit of Exemption Application Forza 4. Ten (10) Copies of tbe project layout (24" X 36" karat) 5. Two (2) Sealed Site Surveys ;✓ 6. Two (2) aerials of site with project overlay, F2'ol S owing sm.�ding 20Q feet 7. One (1) copy of to Owner's Dead 8. Letter o0- Authorization from Ower if ovine- is not the applicant 9. Response from Ire -Application (comment by comment) i✓_ ICOI 27th Street, Vero Beach FL 32950 FACommvgtyDava1Anrort1AFPLiCATIGNSC urDev cppRadicrAtiffidavft of an Aivat ' &riod ATZU 7.016 Page 2 $fi MOMENT 1 32391900001007000002 1 • sq0-LATER41. A -8-w, 32391900001008000001 1 19TH ST (I.IN!:S. Y RD) A-1 32391300001009000007 0 • • • 323920000010050000010 • 32391900001015000003 0 32391900001016000002 0 323919000020000000010 OC LU O. 8 • w • • 11 0) • a • SUR; LATERA!. A -8-E • 4 • • • • • s • • PINE'LN • • • INFORMATIONAL MAP - NOT A SURVEY The Information on this map la taken from retlable sources, However, Its accuracy Is not guaranteed. Location Map 65 ET 2. GRID mRx GRAPHIC SCALE ea .mxe P UNE TABLE UNE A LENGTH DIRECTION Ll 11.43' 5 10' 12' 43" E L2 61.65' 5 15' 07' 51' W L3 126.83' N 77 22' 42" W L4 67.79' N 84' 30' 20" W L5 9.46' 500'03' 19'E L6 229.68' 5 89' 55' 45' W L7 15.91' N 10' 12' 43' W L8 71.59' S 00' 03' 19' E N_@9k2.04 w 4 ix N 0098'15' E 1324.80 v SHELTRA AFFIDAVIT OF EXEMPTION A DIVISION OF LAND UNDER THE AFFIDAVIT OF EXEMPTION PROCESS LYING WITHIN A PORTION OF TRACT 9 OF SECTION 19, TOWNSHIP 32 SOUTH. RANGE 39 EAST, ACCORDING TO THE LAST GENERAL PLAT OF LANDS OF THE INDIAN RIVER FARMS COMPANY, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 2, PAGE 20. ST LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA SAID LANDS NOW LYING AND BEING IN INDIAN RIVER COUNTY. FLORIDA THERE MAY BE ADDITIONAL COVENANT$, RESTRICTIONS. OR RESERVAPONS AFFECTING THE OWNERSHIP OR USE OF 114E PROPERTY SHOWN THAT ARE NOT RECORDED ON THIS AFRDAWT OF EXEMPTION THAT MAY BE FOUND IN THE PUBUC RECORDS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY. FLORIDA. FAST UNE TRACT 10\ ',WEST UNE TRACT 9 WEST 13 ACRES OF TRACT 9 (LESS AND EXCEPT) PARCEL ID: 32391900001009000009.0 W 325.00 S 0010'28" NOT A PART 3131 ' OF THIS PUT FOUND 1/2' DIA REBAR/ STAMPED "CARTER ASSOC.' REPLACE WON SET 4'x4'8.24' CONCRETE MONUMENT/DISK STAMPED 'PRM LB 205' PLAT 8.M./1: 20.71 NAVD'88 N: 1217652.73 E 829081.54 PARCEL ID: 32391900001009000008.0 4'84'824' CONCRETE MONUMENT STAMPED 'PRM LB 205' PARCEL 3 250,091.31 S.F. SET 4'x4'824' CONCRETE MONUMENT STAMPED 'PRM LB -40' DRAINAGE EASEMENT LACE AN (a 4.5 AND MAIEASEMECE �IJ / MSEMENTICE EASEMENT I / EASEMENT 5.74 ACRES N 0014'05' E 427.00' 8053'27 W 58.2? ONT� MG PARCEL 2 313,062.13 S.F. 7.19 ACRES 31 I FOUND 1/2' DIA REBAR/ PARCEL ID: STAMPED "CARTER ASSOC.' 32391900001009000007.0 10 -,..<1. L 7J....,REPJACE V/TH_SET._4_84'X24'__ �� `C7 ��/� CONCRETE MONUMENT/DISK y G STMAPED 'PRM LB 205' PLAT B.M.e2: 21.10 NAVD'98 _ N: 1217651.61 o � � C 62967021 m p V m 5 89'Sr2Y E h N 00'08'33' E 427.0 m 5 � 60' DRAINAGE. 10051Y 5 89'53'27' E 60.00' k ACCESS EASEMENT /50 /// //�/ �j30' ACCESS EE/ASEME T 918952'04500 60.00'—I�j///j// /��j//////////'05//s86:40:77/ //�..." 1 11 PARCEL 1 200,270.23 S.F. 4.60 ACRES Qx� Sg EAST 1G ACRES OF TRACT 9 (LESS ANO EXCEPT) NOT A PART OF THIS PLAT /EAST UNE TRACT 9 15ECI1ON UNE QQ0ig QP N 80' R.O.W. INDWI RIVER FARMS - WATER CONTROL DISTRICT LATERAL 'A' CANAL 20' R.O.W. MAP CR 505 S-505 6651 AVE SECTION /88530 I.R.00., FL N 00'08'15' E 132482' 6651 AVENUE/C.R. 615-- _ 30'1_ LATERAL 'A" CANAL r30. STAPAPE0 WI .COR LB205 _C16S&ZO' It601AN FiER FARE6 C.)."1"/O—.—T—.—.—.—.—.— P.B. 2, PC 25, S.LCO., Fl_ 9: 1217680.83 ` E: 830079.28 \CAAL R.O.W. UNE EAST 1/4 SECTION CORNER OF SECTION 19-32-39 h WEST 1/4 SECTION CORNER OF SECTION 20-32-39 T. T. Q�� OF THIS PLAT 30' R.O.W., "COUNTY ROAD' DB 413 PC. 23, S.IfCO., FL Q%� bE 4 0 .14 Pg fls 50' R.O.W. INDIAN RIVER FARMS WATER CONTROL DISTRICT LATERAL 'A' CANAL 30' R.O.W. MAP C.R. 505 5-505 66111 AVE - SECTION #88530 I.R.00., FL PLAT BOOK: PAGE: CFN: CLERK'S FILE NUMBER NOTICE 1. FLOOD ZONE: 0115 AFFIDAVIT OF EXEMPTION PLAT UES WITHIN FLOOD ZONE "AE" (EL. 21.0 FEET N.A.V.D. '88). AND FLOOD ZONE "X", AS SHOWN ON FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP (FIRM) NUMBER 12061CO2378, PANEL 0352. SUFFIX H MAP EFFECTIVE DATE DECEMBER 4, 2012 AND MAP INDEX DATED DECEMBER 4, 2D12. 2. FLOOD HAZARD WARNING: THIS PROPERTY MAY BE SUBJECT TO FLOODING DURING THE 19 ANNUAL CHANCE FLOOD. YOU SHOULD CONTACT THE INDIAN RIVER COUNTY BUILDING DIVISION TO OBTAIN THE LATEST INFORMATION REGARDING FLOOD ELEVATIONS AND RESTRICTIONS ON DEVELOPMENT BEFORE MAKING PLANS FOR THE USE OF THE PROPERTY. CURVE TABLE CURVE LENGTH RADIUS DELTA CHORD BEARING DISTANCE TANGENT Cl 59.71' 135.00' 025'20'35' 5 02' 27' 34" W 59.23' 30.35' C2 53.44' 35.00' 087'29'26' 5 50 52' 35" W 48.40' 33.50' C3 73.70' 50.00' 084'27'01' N 42' 16' 50' W 67.20' 45.38' 04 47.12' 30.00' 089'59'04' N 44' 56' 13' E 42.42' 29.99' C5 41.81' 30.00' 079'51'32' 5 50 08' 29" E 3851' 25.11' LEGEND B.M. BENCH MARK B BENCH MARK SYMBOL C.R. - COUNTY ROAD N.A. V.D. NORTH AMERICAN VERTICAL DATUM - INDIAN RIVER FARMS WATER CONTROL DISTRICT I R.00., FL. = INDIAN RIVER COUNTY. FLORIDA I.R.F.CO.SD.= INDIAN RIVER FARMS COMPANY SUBDIVISION S.LCO.. FL.- ST. LUCIE COUNTY. FLORIDA ® e EASEMENT P.B. - PLAT BOOK PG. = PACE 0.9.8./0.11. - OFFICIAL RECORD BOOK BOOK P.C.P. PERMANENT CONTROL POINT PARKER KALON (P.K.) NAIL AND BRASS DISK STAMPED 'CARTER ASSOC. PCP LB 205" P.R.M. = PERMANENT REFERENCE MONUMENT R/W R.O.W. = RIGHT-OF-WAY LA.E. - LIMITED ACCESS EASEMENT WT.COR. WITNESS CORNER C M. = CONCRETE MONUMENT (4'54') ▪ - FOUND CONCRETE MONUMENT (4"04") AS NOTED FDRC 0 = FOUND 1/2' DIAMETER X 18' LONG REBAR WITH CAP STAMPED CARTER ASSOC.' (TYP.) 5 P.R.M. = SET PERMANENT REFERNCE MONUMENT (4'04"X24' CONCRETE MONUMENT PATH 2' DIAMETER ALUMINUM DISK STAMPED CARTER ASSOC. PRM LB 205") • - DENOTES 1/2' DIAMETER X 18' LONG REBAR WITH CAP STAMPED "CARTER ASSOC." (TYP.) • DENOTES SET "MAO' NAIL/TAB STAMPED "MT.COR.LB205" • G.P.S. MONUMENT NW�NE = SECTION CORNER SW 5E CARTER ASSOCIATES. INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS AND PROFESSIONAL SURVEYORS AND MAPPERS 1708 21et STREET VERO BEACH, FLORIDA 32960 TEL (772) 562-4191 FAX (772) 562-7180 PROJECT 9 17-8365 SHEET 3 OF 3 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA MEMORANDUM TO: Jason E. Brown; County Administrator THROUGH: Stan Boling, AICP Community Development Director THROUGH: Sasan Rohani, AICP Chief, Long -Range Planning FROM: Bill Schutt, AICP Chief, Long Range Planning DATE: March 15, 2019 SUBJECT: Request for the Board of County Commissioners to Approve and to Authorize the Board Chairman to Sign the Impact Fee Update Consultant Services Contract It is requested that the following information be given formal consideration by the Board of County Commissioners at its regular meeting of March 26, 2019. DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS On June 13, 2017, three years after the most recent 2014 impact fee update, the Board of County Commissioners (BCC) reviewed the County's impact fee schedule, considered updating it, and decided to postpone an impact fee schedule update until 2019. On November 20, 2018, the BCC reviewed a draft scope of services for a Request for Proposals (RFP) for a consultant to update six (6) of the County's impact fees (excludes Correctional Facilities, Solid Waste Facilities, and Library Facilities), update the local growth rate and the availability of "buy down" revenue used in the Affordable Growth model, and evaluate the County's three separate transportation impact fee benefit districts (north, central, and south county). After discussion, the BCC authorized staff to initiate the consultant selection process. Subsequently, staff incorporated the approved Scope of Services into an RFP (Request for Proposals) for consultant services and issued the RFP on December 14, 2018. By the January 18, 2019 submittal deadline, the County received two (2) proposals, which were thereafter distributed to a consultant selection committee to review. That selection committee, comprised of Stan Boling, Community Development Director, Kristin Daniels, Budget Director, and Phil Matson, Metropolitan Planning Organization Staff Director met on February 1, 2019 to review the results of their independently evaluated and scored proposals in accordance with the County Purchasing 1 67 Manual and the criteria established in the RFP. Based on the written proposal, staff experience, and other factors, the committee ranked Tindale -Oliver and Associates, Inc. as number one for impact fee update consultant services. On February 12, 2019, the Board of County Commissioners reviewed and approved the selection committee's recommendation and authorized staff to proceed with contract negotiations with the number one ranked firm, Tindale -Oliver and Associates, Inc. (and the subsequent ranked firm, should negotiations with the higher ranked firm fail). ANALYSIS Since Board approval of the consultant selection committee's recommendation, staff has successfully negotiated a proposed contract with the top ranked consultant (Attachment 1). That contract contains tasks authorizing the consultant to: 1. utilize the latest available data to update land acquisition and infrastructure costs; 2. review existing and adopted levels of service to determine the LOS that can be used in the fee calculations; 3. update impact fee credits based on the availability of other funding sources; 4. update the Affordable Growth Model based on a reexamination of growth rate assumptions and available "buy down" revenue; 5. develop an updated impact fee cost schedule; and 6. review existing traffic impact fee benefit districts and make recommendations regarding boundary changes and/or reduction in number of districts. The negotiated cost for impact fee update consultant services to be provided by Tindale -Oliver and Associates, Inc. is $149,529. That amount is $27,634 less than the $177,163 original proposed amount in the consultant's response to the County's RFP and is over $50,000 less than the impact fee update the same consulting firm completed for the county in 2014. Based upon the project schedule included in Appendix A of the proposed contract, the impact fee study update is scheduled to take approximately 9 months to complete. This schedule is consistent with the County's anticipated 9 month project time frame listed in the RFP. The proposed schedule anticipates that a Notice to Proceed will be issued on April 1, 2019, with a draft Technical Report submittal in late September and a final report submittal in late October. A total of three public meetings are anticipated during the months of October through November 2019 for review and adoption of the impact fees. FUNDING Charges from the impact fee consultant will be paid with revenue from the Impact Fee administration fund - Impact Fees/Administration/Other Professional Services (10320415- 033190). 2 68 RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners: 1. Approve the proposed contract between the Board of County Commissioners and Tindale - Oliver and Associates, Inc. for impact fee update consultant services; and 2. Authorize the Chairman to execute the contract. ATTACHMENT 1.) Proposed contract between the Indian River County Board of County Commissioners and Tindale -Oliver and Associates, Inc. for impact fee update consultant services. F:\Community Development\Impact Fee\IMPACT FEE STUDIES\2018 Update\Consultant Contract\BCC Item - Impact Fee Consultant Contract.docx 3 69 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY IMPACT FEE UPDATE STUDY CONSULTANT CONTRACT By and Between INDIAN RIVER COUNTY And TINDALE-OLIVER AND ASSOCIATES, INC. THIS CONTRACT FOR THE INDIAN RIVER COUNTY IMPACT FEE UPDATE STUDY between Indian River County, hereafter referred to as "County", and Tindale -Oliver and Associates, Inc., Impact Fee Study Consultant, hereafter referred to as "Consultant" is entered into this 26th day of March, 2019. I. Duration of the Contract This contract is valid from March 26, 2019 until January 1, 2020 unless canceled by either Consultant or County, after a 30 day written notice. Consultant shall commence work within seven (7) days after receiving the notice to proceed, unless notice to proceed indicates otherwise. The contract may be extended upon written approval by the County. II. Scope of Services Scope of Services is attached to this contract as Appendix "A". III. Compensation Method (Fees) The professional services described in the Scope of Services, including all travel expenses and other direct expenses, will be provided for a total cost of $149,529.00. 1. County shall pay to Consultant a mutually agreed upon lump sum professional fee for each activity as shown on Appendix "B" of this contract, to be paid in monthly installments as invoiced by Consultant. Each monthly invoice will document the work performed. Upon submittal of an invoice documenting the completion of all or a portion of one or more of the Tasks listed in the Scope of Services, the County Project Manager will determine if the Tasks or portions thereof have been satisfactorily completed. Upon a determination of satisfactory completion, the County Project Manager will authorize payment to be made for the Task, Tasks, or portions thereof. All payments for services shall be made to Consultant by County in accordance with the Local Government Prompt Payment Act (Florida Statutes §218.70 et seq.) 2. The County Project Manager shall have the sole right to reduce (or eliminate, in whole or in part) any portion of the services at any time and for any reason, upon written notice to Consultant specifying the nature and extent of the reduction. In such event, Consultant shall be fully compensated for the services already performed and also for the services remaining to be done and not reduced or eliminated. Attachwnt 1 3. The County Project Manager may, at any time and for any reason, direct Consultant to suspend services (in whole or in part) under this Agreement. Such direction shall be in writing, and shall specify the period during which services shall be stopped. Consultant shall resume its Services upon the date specified, or upon such other date as the County Project Manager may thereafter specify in writing. Where County has suspended the services under this Agreement for a period in excess of six (6) months, the compensation of Consultant for such suspended services may be subject to modification. The period during which the services are stopped by County shall be added to the time of performance of this Agreement; provided, however, that any stoppage of services not approved or caused by the actions or inactions of County shall not give rise to any claim against County by Consultant. 4. The County, during any fiscal year, shall not expend money, incur any liability, or enter into any contract which, by its terms, involves the expenditure of money in excess of the amounts budgeted as available for expenditure during such fiscal year. Accordingly, the County's performance and obligation to pay under this Agreement is contingent upon any annual appropriation by the Indian River County Board of County Commissioners. IV. Insurance and Indemnification 1. Consultant shall not commence work on this Agreement until it has obtained all insurance required under this paragraph and such insurance has been approved by County's representative. 2. Consultant shall indemnify and hold harmless County, its officers and employees, from liabilities, damages, losses, and costs, including, but not limited to, reasonable attorneys' fees, to the extent caused by the negligence, recklessness, or intentionally wrongful conduct of Consultant and other persons employed or utilized by Consultant in the performance of this Agreement. 3. Consultant shall maintain during the term of this Agreement the following insurance: A. Business Automobile Liability Insurance covering all owned, non -owned and hired vehicles with minimum limits of liability of $500,000 per occurrence Combined Single Limit for bodily injury and property damage. B. Commercial General Liability Insurance for premises/operations, products/completed operations, contractual liability, and independent contractors with a minimum combined single limit of $500,000 per occurrence. C. Worker's Compensation Insurance in compliance with Chapter 440, Florida Statutes, as presently written or hereinafter amended. The policy must include Employers Liability with a limit of $100,000 for each accident, $500,000 for disease (policy limit), and $100,000 for disease (each employee). 4. All insurance policies shall be issued by companies authorized to do business under the laws of the State of Florida. All such insurers must have an A.M. Best rating of no less than A - VII. 2 F:\Community Development\Impact Fee\IMPACT FEE STUDIES\2018 Update\Consultant Contract\2019 Impact Fee Contract - FINALdoZ l 5. Consultant shall furnish certificates of insurance to County prior to the commencement of operations, which certificates shall clearly indicate that Consultant has obtained insurance in the type, amount, and classification as required for strict compliance with this section and that no material change or cancellation of this insurance shall be effective without thirty (30) days prior written notice to the County. 6. Compliance with the foregoing requirements shall not relieve Consultant of its liability and obligations under this section or under any other portion of this Agreement. V. Audit Rights County reserves the right to audit the records of Consultant related to this contract at any time during the execution of the work included herein and for a period of three years after final payment is made. Bills for fees or other compensation for services or expenses shall be submitted to County in detail sufficient for a proper pre -audit and post audit thereof. VI. Other Requirements and Legal Notices • Debarment Consultant certifies that he has not been debarred from bidding, proposing, or contracting for federal, state, or local government programs or activities. • Independent Contractor It is specifically understood and acknowledged by the parties hereto that Consultant or employees or subcontractors of Consultant are in no way to be considered employees of County, but are independent contractors performing solely under the terms of the Agreement and not otherwise. • Assignment Consultant shall not assign this contract without the express written approval of County via executed amendment. • Miscellaneous 1. The terms of this Agreement may be modified upon the mutual agreement of Consultant and County as confirmed in writing. 2. It is mutually agreed between County and Consultant that this Agreement, including all attachments to it, constitutes an agreement, made in Florida, and that it shall be construed according to the laws of the State of Florida. Venue for any lawsuit brought by either party against the other party or otherwise arising out of this agreement shall be in Indian River County, Florida, or, in the event of federal jurisdiction, in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida. 3. All remedies provided in this Agreement shall be deemed cumulative and additional, and not 3 F:\Community Development\Impact Fee\IMPACT FEE STUDIES\2018 Update\Consultant Contract\2019 Impact Fee Contract - FINAL.do72 in lieu or exclusive of each other or of any other remedy available to either party, at law or in equity. If any legal action or other proceeding is brought for the enforcement of this Agreement or because of an alleged dispute, breach, default or misrepresentation in connection with any provisions of this Agreement, each party shall bear its own costs. 4. If any term or provision of this Agreement or the application thereof to any person or circumstance shall, to any extent, be held invalid or unenforceable for the remainder of this Agreement, then the application of such term or provision to persons or circumstances other than those as to which it is held invalid or unenforceable shall not be affected, and every other term and provision of this Agreement shall be deemed valid and enforceable to the extent permitted by law. • Written Notices Any notice of cancellation of this contract shall be in writing and given by certified mail, return receipt requested, or in person with proof of delivery, to the addresses below, or such other address as either party shall have specified by written notice to the other party delivered in accordance herewith: Consultant: County: • Termination Steve Tindale Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. 1000 North Ashley Drive Suite 400 Tampa, FL 33602-3719 Stan Boling, AICP Community Development Director Indian River County 1801 27th Street Vero Beach, FL 32960 Fax #: (772) 978-1806 Phone #: (772) 226-1253 1. This Agreement may be terminated: 1) by County, for any reason, upon thirty (30) days prior written notice to Consultant; or 2) by Consultant, for any reason, following thirty (30) days prior written notice to County; or 3) by the mutual agreement of the parties; or 4) as may otherwise be provided below. In the event of the termination of this Agreement, any liability of one party to the other arising out of any Services rendered, or for any act or event occurring prior to the termination, shall not be terminated or released. 2. In the event of termination by County, County's sole obligation to Consultant shall be payment for those portions of satisfactorily completed performed work previously authorized. Such payment shall be determined on the basis of the hours of work performed by Consultant, or the percentage of work complete as estimated by Consultant and agreed upon by County up to the time of termination. In the event of such termination, County 4 F:\Community Development\Impact Fee\IMPACT FEE STUDIES \2018 Update\Consultant Contract \2019 Impact Fee Contract - FINAL.do73 may, without penalty or other obligation to Consultant, elect to employ other persons to perform the same or similar services. 3. The obligation to provide services under this Agreement may be terminated by either party upon seven (7) days prior written notice in the event of substantial failure by the other party to perform in accordance with the terms hereof through no fault of the terminating party. 4. In the event that Consultant merges with another company, becomes a subsidiary or makes any other substantial change in structure or in the following principals or project manager Steve Tindale, P.E., County reserves the right to terminate this Agreement in accordance with its terms. 5. In the event of termination of this Agreement, Consultant agrees to surrender any and all documents prepared by Consultant for County in connection with this Agreement, of which County shall have full ownership thereof. Consultant shall retain copies of such documents for record purposes. 6. In the event that this Agreement is terminated by either party prior to Consultant's satisfactory completion of all work as described in the Scope, the project will be deemed abandoned, and no compensation will be paid by County to Consultant for tasks or portions thereof not yet satisfactorily completed. 7. County may unilaterally cancel this Agreement for refusal by Consultant to allow public access to all documents, papers, letters, or other material subject to the provisions of Chapter 119 Florida Statutes and made or received by Consultant in conjunction with this Agreement. 8. County may terminate this Agreement in whole or in part if Consultant submits a false invoice to County. 9. County may terminate this Contract if Consultant is found to have submitted a false certification as provided under section 287.135(5), Florida Statutes, been placed on the Scrutinized Companies with Activities in Sudan List or the Scrutinized Companies with Activities in the Iran Petroleum Energy Sector List, or been engaged in business operations in Cuba or Syria, as defined by section 287.135, Florida Statutes. 10. County may terminate this Contract if Consultant, including all wholly owned subsidiaries, majority-owned subsidiaries, and parent companies that exist for the purpose of making profit, is found to have been placed on the Scrutinized Companies that Boycott Israel List or is engaged in a boycott of Israel as set forth in section 215.4725, Florida Statutes. VII. CCNA Warranty and Truth -in -Negotiation Certificate 1. Consultant warrants that he has not employed or retained any company or person other than a bona fide employee working solely for Consultant to solicit or secure this Agreement and that he has not paid or agreed to pay any person, company, corporation, individual or firm other than a bonafide employee working solely for Consultant any fee, commission, 5 F:\Community Development\Impact Fee\IMPACT FEE STUDIES\2018 Update\Consultant Contract\2019 Impact Fee Contract - FINAL.do'14 percentage, gift or other compensation, contingent upon or resulting from the award or making of this Agreement.. 2. Execution of this Agreement by Consultant shall act as the execution of a truth -in - negotiation certificate certifying that the wage rates and costs used to determine the compensation provided for in this Agreement are accurate, complete and current as of the date of the Agreement and no higher than those charged Consultant's most favored customer for the same or substantially similar service. The wage rates and costs shall be adjusted to exclude any significant sums should County determine that the wage rates and costs were increased due to inaccurate, incomplete or noncurrent wage rates or due to inaccurate representations of fees paid to outside consultants, if any such outside consultants are used with the prior written approval of County. County shall exercise its rights under this "Certificate" within one (1) year following final payment. County has the authority and right to audit Consultant's records under this provision. County does not hereby waive any other right it may have pursuant to Florida Statutes section 287.055, as it may be from time -to - time amended. VIII. Responsibilities of the Consultant 1. The services rendered by Consultant shall be commenced upon written notice from the County. Consultant agrees to complete the Project within the time frame specified in the Scope of Services. 2. Consultant shall not commence work under this contract until it receives a written Notice to Proceed from the County. 3. Consultant shall submit copies of all proposed changes to the project scope of services for review and approval by County before authorization of any contract change order. After said review and approval by County, changes shall not be effective unless in writing and properly executed by the parties. 4. Consultant, as a part of the consideration hereof, does hereby covenant and agree that: 1) in connection with the furnishing of services to County hereunder, no person shall be excluded from participation in, denied the benefits of, or otherwise subjected to discrimination in regard to the services to be performed by Consultant under this Agreement on the grounds of such person's race, color, creed, national origin, religion, physical disability, age or sex; and 2) Consultant shall comply with all existing requirements concerning discrimination imposed by any and all applicable local, state, and federal rules, regulations, or guidelines, as such rules, regulations, or guidelines may be from time to time amended. 5. Consultant shall designate a representative to keep County staff informed as to all aspects of the project work. The name and address of Consultant's designated representative is: Steve Tindale, 1000 North Ashley Drive, Suite 400, Tampa, FL 33602. 6. Consultant shall have all records and project work accessible for inspection and review by County at such time as is mutually agreeable to all parties. 6 F:\Community Development\Impact Fee\IMPACT FEE STUDIES\2018 Update\Consultant Contract\2019 Impact Fee Contract - FINAL.do75 7. Consultant shall keep and maintain financial, invoice, and employment records pertaining to the contractual obligation between County and Consultant for pre -audit and post -audit purposes for a period of three (3) years following the completion of all project work, or until all claims and audit findings involving the records have been received, whichever is later. County, or any of its duly authorized representatives shall have access to any books, documents, papers, and records of Consultant which are directly pertinent to this Agreement, for the purpose of making audit, examination, excerpts, and transcription. 8. Consultant shall forward all documentation as it pertains to the project to the designated County Project Manager. Name: Stan Boling Address: Indian River County, 1801 27th Street, Vero Beach, FL 32960. 9. It is understood and agreed that all documents, including reports and other data prepared or obtained by Consultant in connection with its services hereunder, shall be delivered to, and become the property of, County prior to final payment to Consultant. 10. In connection with professional services to be rendered pursuant to this contract, Consultant further agrees to: A. Maintain an adequate staff of qualified personnel. B. Ensure that plans meet all current federal, state and local laws, rules, or ordinances applicable to the work. C. Cooperate fully with County in the scheduling and coordination of all phases of the work. D. Cooperate and coordinate with other County consultants, as directed by County. E. Report the status of the work to County upon request and hold pertinent data, calculations, field notes, records, sketches and other projects open to the inspection of County or its authorized agent at any time. F. Interpret plans and other documents; correct errors and omissions and prepare any necessary plan revisions not involving a change in the scope of the work required, at no additional cost within thirty (30) calendar days of notice by County, or upon a determination of Consultant of the existence of such errors or omissions, whichever event shall first occur. 11. Consultant shall, during the entire term of this Contract, procure and keep in full force, effect, and good standing any and all necessary licenses, registrations, certificates, permits, and any and all other authorizations as are required by local, state, or federal law, in order for Consultant to render its services as described in this Agreement. Consultant shall also require all sub -consultants to comply with the provisions of this section. IX. Responsibilities of the County 1. County shall provide Consultant access to appropriate records, documents, and other materials necessary to complete the project. 7 F:\Community Development\Impact Fee\IMPACT FEE STUDIES\2018 Update\Consultant Contract\2019 Impact Fee Contract - FINAL.do76 2. The County Project Manager shall represent County in all technical matters pertaining to the work and performance of this Contract, and his responsibilities shall include: A. Examination of all reports, surveys, and other documents presented by Consultant and rendering, in writing, decisions pertaining thereto within a reasonable time so as not to materially delay the work of Consultant. For purposes of this contract, reasonable period of time will mean four (4) weeks from receipt of applicable material. B. Transmission of instructions, receipt of information, interpretation and definition of County policies and decisions with regard to the work covered by this Contract. C. Transmission of prompt written notice to Consultant whenever County observes or otherwise becomes aware of any defects or changes necessary in the project. X. Prohibited Interests No member, officer, or employee of County or of the member governments during his/her tenure or for two years thereafter shall have any interest, direct or indirect, in this Agreement or the proceeds thereof. This requirement also applies to any subcontract entered into by Consultant concerning this proj ect. XI. Public Entity Crime Affidavit As provided by Florida Statute 287.133(2)(a), a person or affiliate who has been placed on the convicted vendor list following a conviction for a public entity crime may not submit a bid on a contract to provide any goods or services to a public entity, may not submit a bid on a contract with a public entity for the construction or repair of a public building or a public work, may not submit bids on leases of real property to a public entity, may not be awarded or perform work as a contractor, supplier, subcontractor, or consultant under a contract with any public entity, and may not transact business with any public entity in excess of the threshold amount provided in Florida Statute 287.017 for Category Two for a period of 36 months from the date of being placed on the convicted vendor list. Any person must notify the County within 30 days after a conviction of a public entity crime applicable to that person or to an affiliate of that person. By its execution hereof, CONSULTANT certifies that neither it nor an affiliate is on the convicted vendor list. XII. Entire Contract This Contract and its Attachments hereto embody the whole agreement of the parties, and there are no provisions, terms, conditions, or obligations other than those contained herein. This Contract shall supersede all previous communications, representations, or oral agreements between the parties, and no amendment hereto shall be effective unless reduced to writing and signed by the parties hereto. XII. Subcontracting Services assigned to sub -consultants must be approved in advance by County. The sub -consultants 8 F:\Community Development\Impact Fee\IMPACT FEE STUDIES\2018 Update\Consultant Contract\2019 Impact Fee Contract - FINAL.do'77 must be qualified by County to perform all work assigned to them. XIII. Public Records Compliance A. Indian River County is a public agency subject to Chapter 119, Florida Statutes. The Consultant shall comply with Florida's Public Records Law. Specifically, the Consultant shall: (1) Keep and maintain public records required by the County to perform the service. (2) Upon request from the County's Custodian of Public Records, provide the County with a copy of the requested records or allow the records to be inspected or copied within a reasonable time at a cost that does not exceed the cost provided in Chapter 119 or as otherwise provided by law. (3) Ensure that public records that are exempt or confidential and exempt from public records disclosure requirements are not disclosed except as authorized by law for the duration of the contract term and following completion of the contract if the Consultant does not transfer the records to the County. (4) Upon completion of the contract, transfer, at no cost, to the County all public records in possession of the Consultant or keep and maintain public records required by the County to perform the service. If the Consultant transfers all public records to the County upon completion of the contract, the Consultant shall destroy any duplicate public records that are exempt or confidential and exempt from public records disclosure requirements. If the Consultant keeps and maintains public records upon completion of the contract, the Consultant shall meet all applicable requirements for retaining public records. All records stored electronically must be provided to the County, upon request from the Custodian of Public Records, in a format that is compatible with the information technology systems of the County. B. IF THE CONSULTANT HAS QUESTIONS REGARDING THE APPLICATION OF CHAPTER 119, FLORIDA STATUTES, TO THE CONSULTANT 'S DUTY TO PROVIDE PUBLIC RECORDS RELATING TO THIS CONTRACT, CONTACT THE CUSTODIAN OF PUBLIC RECORDS AT: (772) 226-1424 publicrecords(a ircgov.com Indian River County Office of the County Attorney 1801 27th Street Vero Beach, FL 32960 C. Failure of the Consultant to comply with these requirements shall be a material breach of this Agreement. 9 F:\Community Development\Impact Fee\IMPACT FEE STUDIES\2018 Update\Consultant Contract\2019 Impact Fee Contract - FINAL.do78 IN WITNESS OF THE FOREGOING, the parties have read this contract and attachments to it and have affixed their signatures, effective on the date first appearing above. Consultant: By Printed Name and Title Date Witness: INDIAN RIVER COUNTY By its Board of County Commissioners By Bob Solari, Chairman Date Approved by BCC: Attest: Jeffrey R. Smith, Clerk of Court And Comptroller By By Deputy Clerk Printed Name Approved: Jason E. Brown County Administrator Approved as to form and legal sufficiency: William K. DeBraal Deputy County Attorney 10 F:\Community Development\Impact Fee\IMPACT FEE STUDIES\2018 Update\Consultant Contract\2019 Impact Fee Contract - FINAL.doC 9 APPENDIX A Consultant Contract Indian River County Impact Fee Update - 2019 TabK&L Project Approach & Project Schedule This section of the proposal provides a brief background review, followed-up with project approach. BACKGROUND REVIEW/ UNDERSTANDING Located on south central Florida's eastern coast, Indian River County has a current population of 150,000. As shown in Figure 1 below, the County experienced an average annual growth rate of 2.5% between 2000 and 2008. Similar to many other communities, this growth rate decreased to 0.4% per year during the economic downturn between 2009 and 2015. Since then, the population growth rate reached 1.9% per year, reflecting the recent recovery. Most of this growth is occurring in unincorporated county while the five municipalities, located mostly in the coastal areas of the county, accommodate almost 35% of the population within 10% of the land area. Similar to population growth trends, taxable value per capita in Indian River County increased at an average rate of 13% per year between 2000 and 2006. Between 2007 and 2013, the tax base per capita declined. Over the past five years, the tax base started to increase again. These fluctuations in property tax revenues, shown in Figure 2 on the next page, along with population growth make it important for local governments to use alternative revenue sources for government services. To address the infrastructure costs associated with new growth, Indian River County instituted a countywide traffic impact fee program in 1986. Due to the level of growth, the Board of County Commissioners (BCC) in 2005, approved impact Figure 1: Annual Population Growth Rate (2000-2018: 3 -yr Running Avg) Indian River County Florida 0.00% 8 0 8 ' g o Source: BEBR, Volume 51, Bulletin 180, January2018 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY l Impact Fee Update o 0 0 Tindalero liver K & L -1 www.tindaleoliver.com Tab K & L: Project Approach & Project Schedule 25.0% 20.0% 15.0% 10.0% 5.0% 0.0% -s.0% -10.0% -15.0% Figure 2: Taxable Value per Capita Growth Rate ..Indian River County onmpFlorida aO0 O�1 00 0�' OOp Ooh O06 �0 O0% 0O9 01� O�1 O�1 O�1 O1Q O,h O�6 a� ��� O�� 010 011 011 p15 p1A 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Source: Florida Property Valuations and Tax Databook fees for eight additional service/facility categories. Subsequently, as part of the 2014 update, the BCC suspended three of these (correctional facilities, solid waste, and libraries). At this time, to comply with the Impact Fee Ordinance requirements and to reflect most recent data, the County is interested in updating the fees that are currently in place, including: > Traffic > Public Education Facilities > Fire/Emergency Services > Law Enforcement > Public Buildings > Parks In addition, the study will include the update of the Affordable Growth Model based on a review of population growth trends and projections, and available revenue to buy down the fees. PROJECT APPROACH This scope of services to prepare an impact fee update study is organized into six major tasks that outline the analysis related to initial background review/data collection, technical analysis to update the fee for the six program areas, administrative fee update, update of the transportation impact fee benefit districts, update of the Affordable Growth Model, a technical report and meetings/presentations. The work plan for each of the six major tasks is presented in the remainder of this section. SCOPE OF SERVICES TASK 1: Data Collection and Analysis (Addresses Portions of Task 1 of the RFP Scope) Upon receipt of the Notice to Proceed, Tindale Oliver will coordinate with the County the collection of the specific studies, data, previous current policies and procedures, and other related information necessary to complete the study. Some of the data items that wilt be collected include: > Updated capital asset inventories for each service areas. Tindale Oliver will provide the 2014 files obtained during the previous study for the County staff to update. In the case of school impact fee, the inventory will be updated based on the most recent FISH report. Public education administrative, maintenance and fleet inventories will be based on those included in the 2014 study. INDIAN RIVER COUNTY 1 Impact Fee Update K&L-2 Tndale K<OIiver www.tindateoliver.com Tab K & L: Project Approach & Project Schedule > Indian River County MPO 2040 Cost Feasible Plan. > Actual costs of construction and right-of-way acquisitions for roadway projects completed over the past five year as well as on-going projects. > Recent construction project costs, recent bids, and land purchases/appraisals for each service area. > Non -impact fee funding sources and levels used for each infrastructure included in the study. Tindale Oliver will facilitate a kickoff meeting with key County staff to review the data needs and data items received, identify and discuss major technical, legal, and policy issues; coordinate staff/Tindale Oliver responsibilities; and refine the project schedule as necessary. Some of the technical and policy issues that will be discussed include the following: > Role of impact fees in funding infrastructure in Indian River County and level of flexibility needed to meet the County's goals. > Affordable Growth methodology and changes in the County's growth levels. > Alternative funding available for each service area. > Establishment of needs in terms of future projects. > Realignment of benefit districts. > Any administrative or implementation related issues/concerns. TASK 2: Impact Fee Technical Analysis (Addresses Portions of Task 1 of the RFP Scope) This task addresses the update of the six impact fee program areas, which will reflect the capital costs of providing infrastructure in each program area in Indian River County. This work effort includes the update of the inventory of existing facilities; preparation of a demand component; a review of the construction, land, right-of-way, vehicle, equipment, and other related costs; and credits. Subtask 2.1- Inventory of Existing and Planned Facilities As mentioned previously, the County will provide an updated inventory of the six infrastructure types within the County, as well as planned facilities. The roadway inventory includes all non -local classified roadways in the county. The fire/EMS and law enforcement facility inventories include stations and other buildings, vehicles, and equipment. The public buildings inventory includes general government buildings and other support facilities. The parks inventory includes park land and recreational facilities, such as baseball/softball fields, tennis courts, playgrounds, etc. The public education facilities inventory will be obtained from the FISH report and includes school buildings, administrative and maintenance buildings, land, and white and yellow fleets. A summary of capital asset inventory for each program area will be incorporated into the technical report. Subtask 2.2 - Level of Service Analysis Tindale Oliver will document the County's current, achieved level of service (LOS) and its adopted LOS in the Comprehensive Plan, as available. This will determine the appropriate LOS that can be used in the impact fee calculations. In addition, a comparison of County's achieved LOS and adopted LOS standard to those in other Florida counties will also be provided. Subtask 2.3 - Demand Component Tindale Oliver will calculate the demand component for each impact fee program area. In the case of transportation, demand is measured in terms of vehicle miles of travel (VMT). Tindale Oliver has an extensive database that includes trip characteristics studies for over 40 land uses. The demand component will be updated based on secondary data sources, such as the latest ITE Trip Generation Handbook, Tindale Oliver's trip characteristics database, and any alternative studies that may have been conducted in Indian River County. Parks and recreation impact fees typically are charged to residential land uses only, and demand is measured in terms of population per housing unit. This information will be obtained from the American Community Survey. Consistent with the current adopted methodology, functional population will be used for law enforcement, fire/EMS, and public buildings impact fees. Functional population INDIAN RIVER COUNTY 1 Impact Fee Update K&L-3 Tindale><®fiver www.tindaleoliver.com Tab K & L: Project Approach & Project Schedule measures the benefit to each land use based on the presence of people at that land use throughout the day. In other words, land uses are charged for the availability of these services based on full-time equivalent persons present at each land use throughout the day. For public education facilities, demand is measured in terms of student generation rate. Tindale Oliver has developed a Geographic Information Systems (GIS) -based approach that ties student addresses to parcel addresses from the Property Appraiser's database. We used this approach in school impact fee studies for several counties, including Indian River County, which resulted in a more accurate and detailed demand component. The student generation rates will reflect the average number of public school students by type of school (elementary, middle, high) per housing unit and will be calculated for each type of dwelling unit (single-family, multi- family, mobile home, etc.). Finally, as part of this task, land uses included in the County's impact fee schedules will be reviewed and discussed with the County to determine if certain changes are necessary. This work effort will be documented in the technical report. Subtask 2.5 - Cost Component The cost component for each impact fee program area will be calculated to reflect the current cost of adding capacity in Indian River County. Cost elements reviewed will include design and engineering inspection, construction, right-of- way, bridge construction costs, roadway safety improvements, land purchase, vehicle/equipment purchase, and other related costs. Tindale Oliver will review the Capital Improvement Programs, Long Range Transportation Plan, the Capital Improvement Element of the Comprehensive Plan, the Indian River County School District Capital Improvement Plan and Master Plan, annual budgets/reports, recent bids, recently - completed local projects (past five years), recent land/ROW purchases or appraisals, and other relevant documents to identify capital service facility system improvement costs that may be considered in the calculation of the cost component of the impact fee formula for the County. This information will compared to and/ or supplemented with Tindale Oliver's cost databases that include information from other Florida jurisdictions. In the case of school impact fees, local cost estimates will be compared to the construction costs established by the Department of Education (DOE) to comply with the 2016 legislation requiring school districts to limit their spending on new construction to estimates prepared by DOE. Based on discussions with the School District and County staff input, the appropriate cost level will be used in the final calculations. This work effort will be documented in the technical report. Subtask 2.6 - Credit Component Tindale Oliver wilt review historical and projected capital improvement funding sources and expenditures for land, construction, design and engineering inspection and other related costs in Indian River County. These may include the recently extended local option sales tax, fuel tax, ad valorem tax, grants, and other non -impact fee funding. Debt service for any bond proceeds used for capacity expansion projects will be reviewed and documented as appropriate. These calculations will reflect any recent and/or anticipated changes in how the capital assets are funded. This information will be used to prepare the credit component of the impact fee formula. This work effort will be documented in the technical report. Subtask 2.7 - Transportation Impact Fee Benefit Districts (Addresses Task 4 of the RFP scope) Tindale Oliver will review existing three impact fee benefit districts and make recommendations regarding any boundary changes and/or reduction in the number of districts. The analysis will be based on a review of physical or man- made barriers, municipal boundaries, travel patterns in the county, revenue generation in each benefit district and other similar criteria. If desired by the County, as part of this analysis, Tindale Oliver will identify any regional roads that may be eligible for funding from all districts. TASK3: Update of Affordable Growth Model (Addresses Task 2 of the RFP scope) As part of the 2014 update study, Tindale Oliver developed an affordable growth model for Indian River County. This model evaluates the available INDIAN RIVER COUNTY 1 Impact Fee Update Tindale""Oliver K & L - 4 www.tindaleoliver.com Tab K& L: Project Approach & Project Schedule funding sources and levels for capacity projects compared to projected growth levels and adjusts fees accordingly. This approach recognizes the new development's impact is moderated in more urbanized areas with a larger population and tax base and available infrastructure compared to more suburban/rural areas with high growth rate and limited tax base and infrastructure. Based on the analysis outlined in Task 2 as well as projected population growth levels, this task will update the affordable growth model to assist the County in developing incentives to encourage the desired types of future development. Results of this task will be incorporated in the draft technical report. Task 4: Updated Fee Schedules and Technical Report Subtask 4.1- Updated Fee Schedules (Addresses Task 3.2 of the RFP Scope) Based on the analysis conducted in Tasks 1 through 3, an updated fee schedule will be developed for each service area. The fee schedules will reflect the preferred policy and other alternatives selected by the County, as appropriate. Subtask 4.2 - Administrative Review and Fee Update (Addresses Task 3.1 of the RFP Scope) Tindale Oliver wilt review the current procedures and other relevant information available from the County to estimate staff time associated with administering the existing impact fee program. Based on this information, the annual costs for administering the impact fee program will be estimated and an update of the administrative fees will be prepared. This update will comply with the state requirement of administrative costs not exceeding actual cost of administering the program. Tindale Oliver will also review administration policies an procedures and make recommendations for improvements, if necessary. Subtask 4.3 - Technical Report (Addresses Task 5.2 of the RFP Scope) Results of Tasks 1 through 4.2 will be summarized in a draft technical report. The technical report will include all information, estimates, projections, and data analysis as well as any assumptions made and methodologies employed to complete these tasks. Upon receipt of comments from the County, Tindale Oliver will make the necessary revisions to the draft report and prepare the final report, which will incorporate input from the County and other community groups and agencies as appropriate. TASK 5: Meetings and Presentations (Addresses Task 5.1 of the RFP Scope) As part of this study, the following meetings and presentations will be conducted: > Kickoff conference call meeting. > One conference call meeting with the County staff to review draft report findings and prepare for public meetings. > Three in-person meetings/workshops/public hearings for review and adoption of the impact fees. During these days, Tindale Oliver will also be available to meet with County staff separately. For all presentations, Tindale Oliver will prepare user-friendly, easy -to -follow materials in PowerPoint and provide drafts to County staff for review prior to the each meeting/presentation. In addition to these formal meetings, Tindale Oliver will be in close contact with the County's Project Manager to ensure that the County is aware of the study's progress. TASK 6: Impact Fee Update Requirements and Provisions of Work (Addresses Task 6 of the RFP Scope) Tindale Oliver will complete the study in nine months from the issuance of the Notice to Proceed, provided that the County provides the necessary data and schedules public meetings in a timely manner. A preliminary schedule is provided on the next page, which can be adjusted to better meet the County's needs. Tindale Oliver will submit written progress reports on a monthly basis describing the work performed on each task. In addition, on a monthly basis, we will submit one originally signed copy of an invoice package to the County's Project Manager. INDIAN RIVER COUNTY 1 Impact Fee Update Tindale) << liver K & 1- 5 www.tindaleoliver.com Tab K& L: Project Approach & Project Schedule Indian River County Comprehensive Impact Fee Update Tindale Oliver Proposed Project Timeline TEC3Description CEM Receipt of Notice to Proceed April 1, 2019 Submittal of the Data Needs Memo April4, 2019 Kick-off Conference Call Week of April 8, 2019 Receipt of All Requested Data April 10, 2019 Tasks 1 thru 4 Analyses April - December, 2019 Submittal of Draft Technical Report September 30, 2019 Draft Report Review Conference Call Week of October 7, 2019 Submittal of Final Report October 31, 2019 Public Meetings October/November, 2019 Public Hearing November/December, 2019 QUALITY ASSURANCE/QUALITY CONTROL The Tindale Oliver Team has a reputation for completing projects on time while meeting or exceeding the clients' expectation of quality. This is accomplished through the development of detailed tasks, time management practices, project staff meetings with assigned personnel, and regular communication with the client project manager. To ensure that the study stays on schedule, the Tindale Oliver Team conducts weekly internal project meetings to communicate on the progress Project Criteria Assumptions Project Protocols Detailed Review Data Input/Output Editorial Review Technical Review of this project to ensure that we continue to meet the project schedule. In terms of communicating with the County staff, in addition to the periodic meetings outlined under the Scope of Services, the Tindale Oliver Team will be in contact with the County staff on a regular basis through phone conferences regarding any questions about the data, progress of the study, and other related issues. In the past, Tindale Oliver has been consistently successful in keeping its clients informed of their study's progress. Project Plan Project Approach Schedule Timelines Budgets Project Team lir QUALITY CONTROL QUALITY 3 SCHEDULE 4C ASSURANCE ADHERENCE Cet4r; • Control/Assurance 2/ COST 7 CONTROL 5 COMMITMENT TO QUALITY INDIAN RIVER COUNTY I Impact Fee Update Tindale> Oliver K & L- 6 www.tindateoliver.com APPENDIX B Consultant Contract Indian River County Impact Fee Update - 2019 COST PROPOSAL As shown on the Proposal Pricing table below, the professional fees and expenses associated with the Indian River County Impact Fee Update are estimated at $149,529 for the update of transportation, fire/emergency services, law enforcement, public buildings, parks, and public education facilities impact fees, which includes two conference calls and three in-person meetings. Tab M Cost Proposal This is a lump sum budget which includes all services and necessary travel, and the County will be invoiced monthly for the portion of the work completed. A detailed breakdown of the budget is included on the following page. Tindale Oliver will be happy to respond to any questions from County staff to clarify our proposed cost and/or provide additional information as necessary. Indian River County Impact Fee Update Tindale Oliver Proposal Pricing Table Task 1 Data Collection and Analysis $98,549 Task 2 Methodology -- Update Affordable Growth Model $11,637 Task 3 Update Fee Schedule $12,995 Task 4 Transportation Impact Fee Benefit District $5,525 Task 5 Final Report $6,232 Task 6 Meetings & Presentations $14,591 Total $149,529 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY I Impact Fee Update M-1 Tindale> liver www.tindaleoliver.com Tab M: Cost Proposal Indian River County Impact Fee Update Tindale Oliver Proposed Project Budget IQ3 EEC/ 0 Project =EV $200.00 Project =MIR 160.00 auflair @iWO $131.00 Planner/ CM= $80.00 SrPlannin•, ®ice 4 Q Admin eariaii am 5+ fag in :me BURDENED &ET iisym • TASK]. DATA COLLECTION AND REVIEW 3.0 6.0 4.0 1.0 0.0 LO 15.0 $2352 1.1 Send Data Request Memorandum 1.0 2.0 1.0 1.0 5.0 $727 12 Review Flackground Materials& Data Received 7.0 4.0 3.0 1.0 10.0 $1,575 TASK2 IMPACT FEE TECHNICAL ANALYSIS 61.0 153.0 323.01 216.0 51.01 6.01 810.0 $101,822 2.A UPDATE TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE 24.0 59.0 124.0 62.0 11.0 LO 282.0 $36,837 2.A1 Inventory/LOS 3.0 10.0 18.0 14.0 1.0 46.0 $5,822 2.A2 Cost Component 7.0 15.0 32.0 18.0 4.0 76.0 $9,860 2.A3 Credit Component 4.0 12.0 34.0 18.0 3.0 71.0 $8,975 2.A4 Demand Component 4.0 14.0 25.0 3.0 46.0 $G,G55 2.A5 Benefit District Ana lysis 6.0 8.0 15.0 9.0 4.0 42.0 $5,525 2.8 UPDATE EDUCATIONAL FACILITIES IMPACT FEE 13.0 39.0 85.0 47.0 29.0 1.0 214.0 $26,322 2.B1 Inventory 3.0 5.0 8.0 7.0 1.0 LO 25.0 $3,187 2.B2 Cost Component 4.0 12.0 22.0 15.0 3.0 SG.0 $7,115 2.B3 Credit Component 3.0 14.0 23.0 14.0 54.0 $7,065 2.B4 Demand Component 3.0 8.0 32.0 11.0 25.0 79.0 $8,955 2.0 UPDATE PARKS IMPACT FEE 8.0 25.0 37.0 39.0 3.0 1.0 113.0 $14,012 2.C1 Inventory/LOS 2.0 6.0 11.0 8.0 LO 28.0 $3,557 2.C2 Cost Component 2.0 10.0 14.0 18.0 3.0 47.0 $5,555 2.C3 Credit Component 2.0 6.0 7.0 9.0 24.0 $3,025 2.C4 Demand Component 2.0 3.0 5.0 4.0 14.0 $1,875 2.D UPDATE PUBLIC BUILDINGS IMPACT FEE 6.0 13.0 25.0 23.0 2.0 1.0 70.0 $8,717 2.D1 Inventory/LOS 2.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 1.0 18.0 $2,267 2.D2 Cost Component 1.0 5.0 6.0 5.0 2.0 19.0 $2,360 2.03 Credit Component 2.0 2.0 8.0 5.0 17.0 $2,200 2.D4 Demand Component 1.0 2.0 6.0 7.0 16.0 $1,890 2.E UPDATE LAW ENFORCEMENT IMPACT FEE 5.0 8.0 25.0 22.0 3.0 1.0 64.0 $7,712 2.E1 Inventory/LOS 1.0 2.0 5.0 6.0 1.0 1.0 16.0 $1,822 2.E2 Cost Component 1.0 2.0 6.0 5.0 2.0 16.0 $1,880 2.E3 Credit Component 1.0 2.0 8.0 4.0 15.0 $1,920 2.E4 Demand Component 2.0 2.0 6.0 7.o 17.0 $2,090 2.F UPDATE FIRE/EMS FACILITY IMPACT FEE 5.0 9.0 27.0 23.0 3.0 LO 68.0 $8,222 2.F1 Inventory/LOS 1.0 3.0 7.0 6.0 1.0 1.0 19.0 $2.252 2.F2 Cost Component 2.0 2.0 6.0 6.0 2.0 18.0 $2,160 2.F3 Credit Component 1.0 2.0 8.0 4.o 15.0 $1,920 2.F4 Demand Component 1.0 2.0 6.0 7.0 16.0 $1,890 TASK3 UP ATE OF AFFORDABLE GROWTHMODEL 10.0 18.0 31.01 20.0 12.01 1.01 92.0 $11,637 3.1 Affordable Growth Analysis 10.0 18.0 31.01 20.0 12.01 1.01 92.0 511,631 TASK4 FEE SCHEDULES & TECHNICAL REPORT 16.0 34.0 55.0 33.0 6.0 1.0 145.0 $19,227 4.1 Fee Schedule Preparation 6.0 12.0 22.0 18.0 58.0 $7,530 4.2 Administrative Cost Calculations 4.0 12.0 15.0 9.0 40.0 $5,465 4.3 Prepare Draft and Final Reports 6.0 10.0 18.0 6.0 6.0 1.0 4/.0 S6.232 TASK6 MEETINGS AND PRESENTATIONS 31.0 39.0 9.01 9.0 0.01 3.01 91.0 $14,591 6.1 Kick-off Meeting (Conf Call) 3.0 3.0 1.0 7.0 $1,152 6.2 One Conference Call to Present Draft Impart Fee Study Results 4.0 6.0 3.0 3.0 1.0 17.0 $7,477 6.3 ThreeAdditional Meetings 24.0 30.0 6.0 6.0 1.0 6/.0 510,962 TOTAL PROJECT BUDGET 121.0 250.0 422.01 279.0 69.01 12.01 1,153 $149,529 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY I Impact Fee Update Tindale} Oliver www.tindaleoliver.com INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA MEMORANDUM CONSENT TO: Jason E. Brown, County Administrator THROUGH: Richard B. Szpyrka, P.E., Public Works Director FROM: Monique Filipiak, Land Acquisition Specialist SUBJECT: 37th Street and Indian River Boulevard - Acquisition of Right -of -Way 3725 Indian River Boulevard, Vero Beach, FL 32960 Owner: EGV 1, LLC DATE: March 14, 2019 DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS Public Works is purchasing right-of-way for reconfiguring the intersection of 37th Street and Indian River Boulevard to a standard T-type signalized intersection. The County needs to acquire the triangular shaped parcel located at the northwest corner of Indian River Boulevard and 37th Street for this purpose. EGV 1, LLC owns the 0.32 acre unimproved parcel of property located at 3725 Indian River Boulevard, Vero Beach, FL 32960. The property is zoned OCR Office Commercial, Residential District. Staff obtained an appraisal of the property indicating a value of $175,000.00. The County offered EGV 1, LLC $175,000.00 to purchase the property. After a few weeks of negotiations with the landowner's attorney, Bruce Barkett, all parties agreed on $175,000.00 purchase price, and $3,500 for attorney fees. The total to be paid at closing is $178,500.00. FUNDING Funds for this expenditure are budgeted and available from Optional Sales Tax/ROW/37th Street/US 1 to Indian River Boulevard Account # 31521441-066120-13009. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends the Board approve the Purchase Agreement for the 0.32 acres of property located at 3725 Indian River Boulevard, Vero Beach, FL 32960, and authorize the Chairman to execute the purchase agreement on behalf of the Board. ATTACHMENTS Purchase Agreement APPROVED AGENDA ITEM FOR: March 26, 2019 88 C:\Users\legista r\AppData\Local\Temp\BCL Technologies \easyPDF 8\@BCL@000EC620\@BCL@OOOEC620.doc AGREEMENT TO PURCHASE AND SELL REAL ESTATE BETWEEN INDIAN RIVER COUNTY AND EGV 1, LLC THIS AGREEMENT TO PURCHASE AND SELL REAL ESTATE ("Agreement") is made and entered into as of the day of , 2019, by and between Indian River County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida ("the County"), and EGV 1, LLC, a Florida limited liability company ("the Seller) who agree as follows: WHEREAS, Seller owns property located at 3725 Indian River Boulevard, Vero Beach, Florida 32960. A legal description of the property is attached to this agreement as Exhibit "A" and incorporated by reference herein; and WHEREAS, the County is purchasing right-of-way for the reconfiguring of the intersection of nth Street and Indian River Boulevard to a standard T-type intersection; and WHEREAS in order to proceed with the road plans, the County needs to purchase property to be used as right-of-way from landowners adjacent to 37th Street and Indian River County Boulevard; and WHEREAS, the County contacted the Seller and offered to purchase the parcel of approximately 13,939 square feet or 0.32 acres of property as depicted on Exhibit "A", and WHEREAS, the County is currently purchasing property/right-of-way from willing sellers: and NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual terms, conditions, promises, covenants and premises hereinafter, the COUNTY and SELLER agree as follows: 1. Recitals. The above recitals are affirmed as being true and correct and are incorporated herein. 2. Agreement to Purchase and Sell. The Seller hereby agrees to sell to the County, and the County hereby agrees to purchase from Seller, upon the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement that certain parcel of real property located at 3725 Indian River Boulevard, Vero Beach, Florida and more specifically described in the legal description' attached as Exhibit "B", fee simple, containing approximately 0.32 acres, all improvements thereon, together with all easements, rights and uses now or hereafter belonging thereto (collectively, the "Property"). 2.1 Purchase Price, Effective Date. The purchase price ("Purchase Price") for the Property shall be $175,000.00 (One Hundred Seventy- Five Thousand 00/100 Dollars) plus attomey's fees not to exceed $3,500.00. The total paid on the Closing Date will be $178,500.00. The Purchase Price shall be paid on the Closing Date. The Effective Date of this Agreement shall be the date upon which the County shall have approved the execution of this Agreement, either by approval by the Indian River County Board of County 89 Commissioners at a formal meeting of such Board or by the County Administrator pursuant to his delegated authority. 3. Title. Seller shall convey marketable title to the Property by warranty deed free of claims, liens, easements and encumbrances of record or known to Seller; but subject to property taxes for the year of Closing and covenants, restrictions and public utility easements of record provided (a) there exists at Closing no violation of any of the foregoing; and (b) none of the foregoing prevents County's intended use and development of the Property ("Permitted Exceptions"). 3.1 County may order an Ownership and Encumbrance Report or Title Insurance Commitment with respect to the Property. County shall within fifteen (15) days following the Effective Date of this Agreement deliver written notice to Seller of title defects. Title shall be deemed acceptable to County if (a) County fails to deliver notice of defects within the time specified, or (b) County delivers notice and Seller cures the defects within thirty (30) days from receipt of notice from County of title defects ("Curative Period"). Seller shall use best efforts to cure the defects within the Curative Period and if the title defects are not cured within the Curative Period, County shall have thirty (30) days from the end of the Curative Period to elect, by written notice to Seller, to: (i) to terminate this Agreement, whereupon shall be of no further force and effect, or (ii) extend the Curative Period for up to an additional 90 days; or (iii) accept title subject to existing defects and proceed to closing. 4. Representations of the Seller. 4.1 Seller is indefeasibly seized of marketable, fee simple title to the Property, and is the sole owner of and has good right, title, and authority to convey and transfer the Property which is the subject matter of this Agreement, free and clear of all liens and encumbrances. 4.2 From and after the Effective Date of this Agreement, Seller shall take no action which would impair or otherwise affect title to any portion of the Property, and shall record no documents in the Public Records which would affect title to the Property, without the prior written consent of the County. 4.3.1 There are no existing or pending special assessments affecting the Property, which are or may be assessed by any govemmental authority, water or sewer authority, school district, drainage district or any other special taxing district. 5. Default. 5.1 In the event the County shall fail to perform any of its obligations hereunder, the Seller shall, at its sole option, be entitled to: (i) terminate this Agreement by written notice delivered to the County at or prior to the Closing Date and thereupon neither the Seller nor any other person or party shall have any claim for specific performance, damages, or otherwise against the County; or (ii) waive the County's default and proceed to Closing. 5.2 In the event the Seller shall fail to perform any of its obligations hereunder, the 90 County shall, at its sole option, be entitled to: (i) terminate this Agreement by written notice delivered to the Seller at or priorto the Closing Date and thereupon neither the County nor any other person or party shall have any claim for specific performance, damages or otherwise against the Seller; or (ii) obtain specific performance of the terms and conditions hereof; or (iii) waive the Seller's default and proceed to Closing: 6. Closing. 6.1 The closing of the transaction contemplated herein ("Closing" and "Closing Date") shall take place within 45 days following the execution of the contract by the Chairman of the Board of County Commissioners. The parties agree that the Closing shall be as follows: (a) The Seller shall execute and deliver to the County a warranty deed conveying marketable title to the Property, free and clear of all liens and encumbrances and in the condition required by paragraph 3. (b) If Seller is obligated to discharge any encumbrances at or prior to Closing and fails to do so, County may use a portion of Purchase Price funds to satisfy the encumbrances. (c) If the Seller is a non-resident alien or foreign entity, Seller shall deliver to the County an affidavit, in a form acceptable to the County, certifying that the Seller and any interest holders are not subject to tax under the Foreign Investment and Real Property Tax Act of 1980. (d) The Seller and the County shall each deliver to the other such other documents or instruments as may reasonably be required to close this transaction. 6.2 Taxes. All taxes and special assessments which are a lien upon the property on or priorto the Closing Date (except current taxes which are not yet due and payable) shall be paid by the Seller. 7. Personal Property. 7.1 The Seller shall have removed all of its personal property, equipment and trash from the Property. The Seller shall deliver possession of the Property to County vacant and in the same or better condition that existed at the Effective Date hereof. 7.2 Seller shall deliver at Closing all keys to locks and codes to access devices to County, if applicable. 8. Closing Costs; Expenses. County shall be responsible for preparation of all Closing documents. 8.1 County shall be responsible for all expenses at Closing which include the following: 8.1.1 The cost of recording the warranty deed and any release or satisfaction obtained by Seller pursuant to this Agreement. 91 8.1.2 Documentary Stamps required to be affixed to the warranty deed. 8.1.3 All costs and premiums for the owner's marketability title insurance commitment and policy, if any. 8.2 All costs necessary to cure title defect(s) or encumbrances, other than the Permitted Exceptions, and to satisfy or release of record all existing mortgages, liens or encumbrances upon the Property. 9. Miscellaneous. 9.1 Controlling Law. This Agreement shall be construed and enforced in accordance with the laws of the State of Florida. Venue shall be in Indian River County for all state court matters, and in the Southern District of Florida for all federal court matters. 9.2 Entire Agreement. This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement between the parties with respect to this transaction and supersedes all prior agreements, written or oral, between the Seller and the County relating to the subject matter hereof. Any modification or amendment to this Agreement shall be effective only if in writing and executed by each of the parties. 9.3 Assignment and Binding Effect. Neither County nor Seller may assign its rights and obligations under this Agreement without the prior written consent of the other party. The terms hereof shall be binding upon and shall inure to the benefit of the parties hereto and their successors and assigns. 9.4 Notices. Any notice shall be deemed duly served if personally served or if mailed by certified mail, return receipt requested, or if sent via "overnight" courier service orfacsimile transmission, as follows: If to Seller: If to County: Bruce Barkett, Attorney Collins Brown Barkett 756 Beachland Boulevard Vero Beach, FL 32963 Indian River County 1801 27th Street Vero Beach, FL 32960 Attn: Land Acquisition/Monique Filipiak Either party may change the information above by giving written notice of such change as provided in this paragraph. 9.5 Survival and Benefit. Except as otherwise expressly provided herein, each agreement, representation or warranty made in this Agreement by or on behalf of either party, or in any instruments delivered pursuant hereto or in connection herewith, shall 92 survive the Closing Date and the consummation of the transaction provided for herein. The covenants, agreements and undertakings of each of the parties hereto are made solely for the benefit of, and may be relied on only by the other party hereto, its successors and assigns, and are not made for the benefit of, nor may they be relied upon, by any other person whatsoever. 9.6 Attorney's Fees and Costs. In any claim or controversy arising out of or relating to this Agreement, each party shall bear its own attomey's fees, costs, and expenses. 9.7 Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in two or more counterparts, each one of which shall constitute an original. 9.8 County Approval Required: This Agreement is subject to approval by the Indian River County Board of County Commissioners as set forth in paragraph 2. 9.9 Beneficial Interest Disclosure: In the event Seller is a partnership, limited partnership, corporation, trust, or any form of representative capacity whatsoever for others, Seller shall provide a fully completed, executed, and sworn beneficial interest disclosure statement in the form attached to this Agreement as an exhibit that complies with all of the provisions of Florida Statutes Section 286.23 prior to approval of this Agreement by the County. However, pursuant to Florida Statutes Section 286.23 (3) (a), the beneficial interest in any entity registered with the Federal Securities and Exchange Commission, or registered pursuant to Chapter 517, Florida Statutes, whose interest is for sale to the general public, is exempt from disclosure; and where the Seller is a non-public entity, that Seller is not required to disclose persons or entities holding Tess than five (5%) percent of the beneficial interest in Seller. 93 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed this Agreement as of the date first set forth above. INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS EGV 1, LLC a Florida Limited Liability Company / Bob Solari, Chairman William Gregory, Man in`j'MOmber Approved by BCC Date .9- ATTEST: Jeffrey R. Smith, Clerk of Court and Comptroller By: Deputy Clerk Approved: Jason E. Brown, County Administrator Approved as to Form and Legal Sufficiency: Deputy County Attorney 94 EXHIBIT "A" COM AT A R/R SPIKE REPORTED TO BE IN S - 1/4 COR OF SEC 25-32-39 & RUN ALONG THE SEC LINE N 89 DEG 44 MIN 30 SEC E, , 686.49 FT TO A PT; TH RUN N 00 DEG 03 - MIN 30 SEC W, PARA W/ W LINE OF THE SE 1/4 OF SAID SEC, 55.0 FT TO N LINE OF , BARBER ST & POB; TH RUN N 00 DEG 03 MIN - 30 SEC W, 167.1 FT TO A PT; TH RUN S 44 DEG 56 MIN 05 SEC E, 234.99 FT TO A PT , IN THE N LINE OF BARBER ST; TH RUN - ALONG N LINE S 89 DEG 44 MIN 30 SEC W, 165.81 FT TO THE POB AS DESC IN OR BK , 997 PG 179." PARCEL ID Number: 32-39-25-00000-7000-00002.2 Commonly known as: 3725 Indian River Boulevard, Vero Beach, FL 32960 95 EXHIBITB BOUNDARY SURVEY FOR: INDIAN RIVER COUNTY ENGINEERING DIVISION INDIAN RIVER COUNTY PROJECT NO. 2019-002 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA GRAPHICer -- SCALE ),O;# ,� wanner ,eE _ 37th Streeter Street 051. �vvaR - IPaEli9a� mr'i... .P737ar�+ 7-mauw u-7— REVISION SWAN!, and Abbreviation: NTT A UNMATED N OTe ZGRAPN OAT 05NCRETENONMENT eT COURSE 551i PEEN Ir.I.VCIECOLNTI 0550 NOM ELEVATICN IWO PON MN NIC KANNANTED WV. AtenTitT Pn• 51151.01555.155159 .55 OFPX45.1.115COROS MONPATTEN COUR.P7N NAT..51.1.5,05 COUNT5PUT WONMT. MINT 05TONGENT 0 •aw ETE DATE 0Y INDIAN RIVER COUNTY MA 27TH STREET VERO BEACH. FL 32900 177215a82e DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS ENGINEERING DIVISION Lncetlan Mao (alua lxtloal Pan r nan Es N • VesT 5oaTOF TNT TECi c arENT TOTE IOM ION051.55555N.mEEr rm EntEawa,e>N«NaEN WNNEn,ln..0 FEET TOT morn no. NuN SOWN RET RUN54.1504355.5 505115.5 8001115r4.155WTST. 15511 MT!! PONT GI 613510111.1. nae PEm Som OFFwRN ALICENa®rw ,.Ne w Wt. �aaT. TNT 05.0.535.15176141151.1CTINIST aB;OINT a a�ARaENT05SURVEY N; RTAIONN SURVEY °ADAYSTIENT ITIONOTEDNTTCE . neBaaoma,.,P>.<.LO,m,NNa«nHB„E015E,.0,,3. OW TWA 60.0UNDANNUPTENANCTNAINVIISITIE NAVE ,,. ___ m1wa1ENNe.In<,Nee CANS .Nana 1EeEP_,P„EF,TE,L®aPE ,EH,EnE,YaEa„wH 4. NIS NAM,. PPEPASNONImartllR BENVITOTAITILEKU .Me9aeIHEREaaY TIMMY ON MUM NI THE PLNUCRECOPOSOIINTNNRNEROOMITY,RON0.5. 5 1155 DOLRONNI DOM WRENN SIREVETEDNIO 051551.51E0 INNIN RIVER COWRY PERSONEL COI T. CATE OFTTINNINT5 01.1010.1153 =NW WAS PREPARIENTON MAN INIANTEN NW, FICONNA01524STINTTNE COOL TM NTONCNTAL CONINCT MORE USED ran T,E PRENTANTION OF TINS MAVEN NEM VERINED511502043ANT.5.5415MENT. E NV MOMS NOP awnwE RaPmEa,ABExvrwvxmSCALL FlcasrtaLEwEM. ▪ ANDAISVCON NT SOS =NO. TOIN.SLATMN. S. ANAUSUNIPIENT3 alionNNENNON AND Wel FON TNT FININPATC411, DNS SUITYLNIME t55.4UPVEY MET. ATA SCAN w. maemwMINN 5141.150,15C•51ITILLTS OOD MN! PE.E1Ewlwrv....NNEtlRNew NYAND NEM.E1NTNN.CT M N15.LII tl MTeMN.55E1.1.11053..,MP w1 I/THE sUBJECTINNNTERTICONTAtN51122.5}.5,15015M OP 5E56 CeHlfia,lion ypiµV wR5 ONIAL/C 5.05LEYON11 i50.451,5 w IMAM ceRTIT TINT TM MUMMY CURVET 51.5NN HEREON VAS COINN5170,14350. DIRECT..515 TOINKINANNICSLVVEY 15 IT5.6.5540 CCM., TO 'NE PEST 055(5 CINITIFYINAT TNT 510.0.4iT SURVEY MEETSE517.14.0.05 OF wEuwrm FORM PwcTCT.EuxlnEnECTION MIN/ ROMA ma ¶Entlau5TET .PmwnwTN[aat TE NONA • ONAIT NAIL N.C.14 CERNIMONT NO. SID NN, 2B NGLETT 32S scat e�VixaWtD 1ST NEe>eaa, 0.91CN EVwE 39E 43-0 2.49 2019-002 EGV 1 LLC PARCEL (ADDRESS 3725 INDIAN RIVER BLVD) BOUNDARY SURVEY INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA CONSENT MEMORANDUM TO: Jason Brown, County Administrator FROM: Manny Cabo, Telecommunications Manager THROUGH: Richard B. Szpyrka, P.E., Public Works Director SUBJECT: Proposal for NexusWorx - Fiber Documentation System — Project Phase -2 DATE: March 14, 2019 BACKGROUND Indian River County Public Works Department, through IRC Telecommunications Division recently deployed a secure web -portal based system of municipal fiber optic infrastructure documentation, fiber mapping, and fiber record keeping, for all IRC Outside Plant (OSP), and IRC Inside Plant (ISP) fiber optic network assets. OSP is all fiber optic cable that is located outside any County or IRC Fiber Consortium buildings. ISP is all fiber optic cable located inside any County or IRC Fiber Consortium buildings. The first completed phase of the IRC fiber optic network documentation `pilot project' is known as NexusWorx Phase -1. The NexusWorx application is a product of Byers Engineering Inc., who also manages the mirrored web -portal sites that support this application. The database, records, and all collected OSP and ISP information, is the property of Indian River County BOCC. NexusWorx project Phase -2 is the next sequential step in fully documenting the IRC municipal fiber optic network grid. Phase -2 of the NexusWorx project will document an area north of the IRC South Relief Canal, within a logically selected area, extending north to 45th Street, in Vero Beach. In the east/west coverage area, NexusWorx Phase -2 will range from Highway AIA on the east perimeter, west to 1-95. As with the NexusWorx Phase -1 project, the scope of work will be two tiered. Byers Engineering Inc. will develop the OSP project scope of work, and provide it to Gerelcom Inc., who will go out in the field and open all IRC fiber optic splices and fiber optic patch panels to fully document all IRC fiber connections contained within. Byers Engineering personnel will collect and document all of the ISP fiber information. Once all of the data has been collected, Byers Engineering Inc. will compile and enter all of the data collected, within the NexusWorx Project Phase -2 scope of work area, into the NexusWorx web -portal, for daily use and administration by IRC personnel. The total cost of the Phase 2 Fiber Documentation System process is $292,538.00. ANALYSIS The proposed Phase -2 component of the NexusWorx fiber documentation project described, entails the collection of all IRC field fiber optic network grid data, within the specified coverage area of project Phase -2, by Byers Engineering Inc. to include all of the following: OSP fiber assets to include all underground fiber optic handholds, fiber pull boxes, fiber patch panel housings, IRC traffic fiber cabinets, underground and aerial fiber optic splice enclosures - information detailing the point-to-point fiber optic splice connections contained within each fiber optic splice housing, - within the specified Phase -2 project area. 97 C:\Users\legistar\AppData\Local\Temp\BCL Technologies\easyPDF 8\@BCL@580E77CA\@BCL@580E77CA.docx PAGE TWO Agenda Item: Proposal for NexusWorx Application - Project Phase -2 - March 14, 2019 ISP fiber assets to include all fiber optic patch panel connections within County and shared resource IRC Fiber Consortium building sites - information detailing the point-to-point fiber jumper connections at each fiber optic patch panel, - within the specified Phase -2 project area. After all OSP and ISP fiber network field data has been collected, Byers Engineering Inc. will enter and configure all of the collected fiber infrastructure data into the NexusWorx portal application, to be directly managed by IRC staff at completion of the process. FUNDING The cost for the Byers Engineering NexusWorx segment of the NexusWorx Phase -2 project is $121,100.00 The estimated cost for the Gerelcom Inc. segment of the NexusWorxPhase-2 project is $171,438.00. The NexusWorx Phase -2 project, in the amount of $292,538.00 will be funded by way of a budget amendment from MSTU/Cash Forward -Oct 1st to MSTU/Telecommunications/Other Professional Services- Account # 00423437-033190. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the IRC Board of County Commissioners review and approve the proposed NexusWorx - Fiber documentation system — Project Phase -2. ATTACHMENTS Byers Phase 2 Proposal Gerelcom Phase 2 Quote Fiber Survey Phases Map APPROVED AGENDA ITEM FOR 03/26/19 98 C:\Users\legistar\AppData\Local\Temp\BCL Technologies\easyPDF 8\@BCL@580E77CA\@BCL@580E77CA.docx BYERS Indian River County Implementation ENG�COMP NY BYERS ENGINEERING COMPANY Proposal To Indian River County, Florida Implementation of NexusWorx Phase 2 Byers Engineering Company Mark McDougald - Director Fiber Solutions 6285 Barfield Road Atlanta, GA 30328 404.843.1000 404.843.2000 Fax 99 hotliBYERS ENGINEERING Revision History: Indian River County Implementation Date Issue Author Notes 07/03/2017 1.0 Mark McDougald 11/30/2017 2.0 Mark McDougald Remove estimated cost for splice verification and added End User training scope & cost. 04/11/2018 3.0 Mark McDougald Remove Phase 3 cost 01/31/2019 4.0 Mark McDougald Verified date and updated footer date Copyright © 2019- Byers Engineering Company, Atlanta GA - All rights reserved 400 hit113;ER EPIASY Indian River County Implementation TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Overview 4 2. Project Scope 5 3. Process And Task 5 4. Assumptions 7 5. End User Training 8 6. Cost Breakdown 8 7. Timeline 9 Copyright © 2019- Byers Engineering Company, Atlanta GA - All rights reserved 401 BYERS _'� ENGINEERING COMPANY Indian River County Implementation 1. OVERVIEW This proposal is Byers response to Indian River County's (IRC) requests for a survey and inventory of your fiber optic facilities and encode a next phase of the IRC network into Byers NexusWorx fiber management system. In 2017 Byers has conducted a field survey and inventory, including splice verification, for a pilot area. This pilot project has refined the data points needing to be captured and populated in NexusWorx and as such is reflected in this proposal. The remaining portion of the network has been divided into two phases, 2 and 3. This proposal contains the cost and effort for only phase 2, any references to phase 3 are for information only. In this phase, Byers, unlike the pilot, will not be responsible for the splice verification effort, but IRC will utilize their vendor of choice for this verification. Byers will identify the splice locations as part of our survey and inventory and provide detail list to IRC of these splice locations with fiber cable sizes. We will update the connectivity based on the splice verification data provided from the splice verification vendor and connectivity data from the ISP inventory. Unlike the Pilot this phase will include a single limited (please see details in section 3 — Phase 1 GIS Update) update of features. The migration during the Pilot was performed for the entire network and this data is being updated independently in NexusWorx from the counties GIS. Its Byers recommendation that NexusWorx be the primary source of record for the fiber network data and that data is exported from NexusWorx and loaded into the counties GIS, but it appears the counties GIS group is undertaking their own independent survey and updated of the GIS data. This will be problematic to maintain to independent data stores, keeping these in sync will be near impossible as both databases move forward. Also in addition to these phases Byers effort and cost includes electronically locating the underground conduit runs or direct buried fiber cables in the following scenarios. 1. Conduit runs where Conduit Access Points documented in the GIS but not discovered in the field. 2. Conduit runs where Conduit Access Points are greater than 600' apart. This is to discover 3. For all direct buried segments. These locates had to be performed on segments in the Pilot were expected Handholes were not discovered or the path of the fiber was difficult to predict. Byers pricing is based on the task and scope as defined within this document and estimated units as outlined below. Byers' lump sum price for each phase including all travel and expenses are as follows. Copyright © 2019- Byers Engineering Company, Atlanta GA - All rights reserved 4102 Miles Location Underground & Buried Path Aerial Path Cabinets ISP Locations (Buildings) Phase 2 68 48 77 82 Byers' lump sum price for each phase including all travel and expenses are as follows. Copyright © 2019- Byers Engineering Company, Atlanta GA - All rights reserved 4102 VERS ENGINEERING _ Indian River County Implementation • Phase 2 - $117,900 Byers expects utilize two survey crews with a lead performing ISP Inventories, they should be local in Indiana River for 4-5 weeks performing the survey. In addition to the survey and encoding of facilities Byers as included a discounted price to conduct the three day training course. This is our standard training course and covers all the features and functionality of the application including all editor functions. Day 1 is for all users and Days 2 and 3 are for Editor only. 2. PROJECT SCOPE The final implementation for the entire IRC network has been subdivided into two project areas which are identified on the map images below. The areas are; Red highlighted areas Pilot, Yellow Phase 2 and Blue is Phase 3 3. PROCESS AND TASK Phase 1— GIS Data Update In this initial phase Byers will utilize an export of the county's GIS database, same format and structure provide in the pilot, and will perform a cross check between these features and what was previously provided. Any new features or coordinate changes in the new phases will be loaded into NexusWorx based on the same import rules from the Pilot project. We will not update what has already been updated for Copyright © 2019- Byers Engineering Company, Atlanta GA - All rights reserved 403 BYERS ENGINEERING COMPANY Indian River County Implementation the Pilot area. Phase 2 — OSP/ISP Field Inventory The following covers the task and data that will be collected from the field inventory of ISP and OSP plant. All work will be performed by Byers employees, who primarily are based in our Atlanta office. Byers has offices across the county, including Florida (Orlando and West Palm Beach) and will utilize resources when available from any of these locations. Our Florida operations are almost 100% dedicated to performing OSP Engineering for AT&T. At the end of each substantial segment within each phase, Byers will provide a splice location report, this data can be provided to IRC's splice verification vendor for this task. • Electronic locate of underground facilities in the following scenarios o Conduit runs where Conduit Access Points documented in the GIS but not discovered in the field. o Conduit runs where Conduit Access Points are greater than 600' apart. This is to discover additional Conduit Access Points that might be buried. o For all direct buried segments. • At Underground Handholes o Type and Size o Lid Rating o Locate Ball present. o Number, Type, and Size of Ducts and/or Innerducts o Fiber Optic Cable; Manufacture, Size, Sequentials (at Duct, at Splice Case or Center) o Verify splice closure presence. o Site Pictures. • Aerial Locations o Denote and verify Splice Locations and/or Slack Loops. o Site Pictures. • Traffic Cabinets o Fiber Terminating Devices, Type, Manufacture, Model, Serial #, Number of Ports o Fiber Optic Cable; Manufacture, Size, Sequentials (at Duct, at Splice Case or Center) o Cross -connect (jumpers) Details — Where possible, we do not disconnect or demount equipment. o Site and cabinet content pictures. • Equipment Locations (Buildings) o Fiber Terminating Devices, Type, Manufacture, Model, Serial #, Number of Ports, Port Connector Types. o Terminating Conduit — Number, Type and Size of Ducts and/or Innerduct. o Fiber Optic Cable; Manufacture, Size, Sequentials (at Duct, at Splice Case or Center) o Cross -connect (jumpers) Details - Where possible, we do not disconnect or demount equipment. o Rack Details — Type, Size and rack positions for equipment. o Site & equipment pictures • Poles o Only visual verification will be performed on Poles, meaning a check to see of pole exists and cable is attached. o * May verify cross -connect details at OPGW cross -connect' s, this depends on access and if access does not require by a bucket truck or can be provided by IRC. Phase 3 — NexusWorx Infrastructure Update. The updating of data in NexusWorx will include the following items: Copyright © 2019- Byers Engineering Company, Atlanta GA - All rights reserved 404 BYERS ENGWEERING COMPANY Indian River County Implementation o Breaking Fibers Optic Cables at inventoried splice locations not found in the GIS data. o Breaking Conduit segments o Updating Conduit Duct Groups • Number of Ducts • Size • Type o Updating Fiber Device attributes including but not limited to: • Manufacture • Size • Strand Group • A_ID • A_Size_Sequential • Z_ID ■ Z_Size_Sequential ■ Length • Owned % values o Creating Equipment Location features (Fiber Termination Location) with following attributes. • Site Identification Name o Import Fiber Devices into Traffic Cabinets and Equipment Locations (Buildings) with following attributes. • Comments (Common Name) • Manufacture ■ Model (If available) • Fiber Mode • IP Address (If available) • Trunk Ports o Attachment of digital pictures for: • Conduit Access Points • Cabinets • Equipment Locations o Creating Building Footprints o Creating Racks and mounting fiber devices and attaching pictures. Phase 4 —Build Splice Connectivity in NexusWorx. Upon completion of splice verification by IRC's vendor and providing data that aligns with Byers needs a NexusWorx data technician will utilize the field verified splice data and our ISP connectivity data to build fiber strand and/or port connectivity in NexusWorx. Byers will need to work with IRC to define a Fiber Path naming convention that will be utilized. 4. ASSUMPTIONS The following are the assumptions regarding each phase. Phase 1 — GIS Data Update — • This will be a cross compare to the initial migrated GIS database, and we'll upload into NexusWorx any new features in GIS, not in the initial data load or removed from the county's GIS as long as the removal appears logical. This is only for the Phase 2 area. • We expect the delta between these data sets is expected to be less than 5%. • Below are the rules utilized in the initial migration and the same applies for the update: o Fibers will be loaded only from County Fiber Optic Cable feature class since this Copyright © 2019- Byers Engineering Company, Atlanta GA - All rights reserved 405 BERS ENGINEERING Indian River County Implementation contains all of the consortium fibers. o Fiber Optic Cable feature class contains Copper cables and Conduits which will be extracted and loaded into Copper Cable and Conduit Duct Bank features. o The County Handhole feature class contains, in addition to Handholes, Patch Panel, Traffic Cabinets, and Splice Closure locations. Only Handholes, Traffic Cabinets, and Splice Locations will be loaded with these features. o Fiber Termination or Building locations will be generated from Fiber Building feature class. o Byers will add new attributes to capture percentage ownership. o All data appears to geographically accurate so that no updates will be performed on these features. Fiber cables may be offset to the structures or conduit running line. Phase 2 — OSP/ISP Field Inventory & NexusWorx Update • No Manholes exist or any underground structure is requiring mechanical pumping or ventilation. • All Handholes should be visible or can be discovered by; electronic locating method or GPS location. Byers will not be rodding or pressurize conduit to discover Handhole locations. • Any Handholes/Pull Boxes that cannot be discovered, then determined with IRC's interaction to be covered by hard surface or at unreasonable depths will be the responsibility of IRC to expose for Byers access. Byers will then inventory these locations as long as access can be performed safely within OSHA requirements without additional safety equipment and while survey crews are in local. • Byers will collect GPS for any new features and update for those that appear to be inaccurate from the GIS. • IRC will coordinate and/or provide access to building/ISP locations that will work within the timeframe while Byers personnel are on-site. • IRC will provide any requirements, procedures and/or key's required for accessing traffic cabinets. Phase 4 - Build Splice Connectivity in NexusWorx. • Splice Vendor will provide data in similar or improved fashion than what was provide for the Pilot. Byers can provide an example. • Byers timeline assumes that the splice verification vendor can perform their work within an expected timeline that allows Byers to complete our work. It's expected the will work almost parallel with the survey and inventory crews. 5. END USER TRAINING IRC has requested as part of this effort for Byers to conduct a full end-user training. In that this will occur while field survey and inventory is ongoing Byers will reduce our typical three day training course price. However, this will be our standard three day training that covers all the features and functionality of the application including all editor functions. Day 1 is for all users and Days 2 and 3 are for Editor only. Byers will provide training manuals and trainer, IRC will provide location, internes access and the trainees will need a laptop or PC provided by IRC. 6. COST BREAKDOWN Phase 2 — • GIS Data Update - $3,500 • OSP Field Inventory and Survey— $103,750 • Data Encoding & Connectivity — $10,650 Copyright © 2019- Byers Engineering Company, Atlanta GA - All rights reserved 406 iivSYERS ENGINEERING COMPANY Indian River County Implementation End User Training — • Standard 3 day course on-site at IRC location with up to 7 attendees. = $3,200. 7. TIMELINE Byers' expects that we can produce our deliverables for within 120 calendar days of a notice proceed or PO from IRC for the services as outlined in this proposal. Copyright © 2019- Byers Engineering Company, Atlanta GA - All rights reserved 407 GEREL !,t VOICE / DATA -FIBER 1/04/2019 Manny Cabo Telecommunications Manager Indian River County BCC Business: 772-226-1000 Office: 772-226-1318 Cell #: 772-532-2381 mcaboPircgov.com -4 Fr;(rb 4 • RE: Nexusworx Phase II Project Gerelcom, Inc. proposes a budgetary value for the Phase 2 work of verification of splices within approximately 105 handholes throughout the county to be $171,438.00. This is based on the value of the work completed during Phase 1 of the project plus a 5% increase in our costs. The average splice verification value is $1,632.74 per location. Any variation in the quantity of locations needed to be surveyed will be added, or deducted upon final invoicing. Please do not hesitate to call with any questions or concerns. Sincerely, Bryan Lanham, RCDD Vice President 560 N.W. Enterprise Drive, Port St. Lucie, Florida 34986 * (772) 340-5998 * Fax (772) 340-3666 E-mail: email@gerelco.com * Website: www.aerelco.com 108 Indian River County — Fiber Optic Survey Phases Map 109 $ - I< Consent Agenda Item INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF UTILITY SERVICES Date: March 13, 2019 To: Jason E. Brown, County Administrator From: Vincent Burke, P.E., Director of Utility Services Prepared By: John M. Boyer, P.E., Utilities Engineer Subject: Work Order No. 1 for Southeastern Surveying 45th Street Improvements Water and Sewer Utility Relocations BACKGROUND Public Works is proposing the installation of new stormwater structures and piping as part of their project #1722 — 45th Street Improvements. Note that this area is for locations west of 43rd Avenue and out to 58th Avenue. The project construction plans indicate 40 locations where the proposed stormwater structures and piping may conflict with existing Indian River County Department of Utility Services (IRCDUS) water and sewer utilities. IRCDUS has therefore decided to hire a survey and mapping company that specializes in locating underground utilities to verify the horizontal and vertical location of its water and sewer mains. ANALYSIS On October 4, 2016, the Board of County Commissioners (BCC) approved the Continuing Contract for Professional Survey & Mapping Services with Southeastern Surveying and Mapping Corporation. In accordance with that agreement, and the renewal of said agreement dated September 18, 2018, Southeastern Surveying and Mapping Corporation will provide professional surveying services to verify the location of IRCDUS water and sewer mains. The resulting data will be utilized by the project's design consultant in the preparation of Engineering Design plans. FUNDING Funds for the project will be derived from the 45th Street Water Main account in the Operating Fund. Operating funds are derived from water and sewer sales. Description Account Number Amount 45th Street 471-169000-16503 $ 27,073.00 RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends the Board of County Commissioners approve Work Order No. 1 with Southeastern Surveying and Mapping Corporation for a lump sum amount of $27,073.00. ATTACHMENTS 1. Work Order No. 1 2. Southeastern Surveying and Mapping Corporation Proposal 110 C:\Users\legista r\AppData\Local\Temp\BCL Technologies\easyPDF 8\@BCL@ D00D292F\@BCL@D00D292F.docx WORK ORDER#1 45th Street Improvements Water & Sewer Utility Relocations This Work Order Number 1 is entered into as of this 26th day of March, 2019, pursuant to that certain Annual Professional Surveying and Mapping Services Master Agreement dated October 04, 2016 and that certain Renewal of Annual Professional Surveying and Mapping Agreement dated September 18, 2018, collectively referred to as the "Agreement" by and between INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Florida ("COUNTY") and Southeastern Surveying and Mapping Corporation ("SURVEYOR"). The COUNTY has selected the SURVEYOR to perform the professional services set forth on Exhibit A (Proposal dated February 21, 2019), attached to this Work Order No. 1 and made part hereof by this reference. The professional services will be performed by the SURVEYOR for the fee schedule set forth in Exhibit A, attached to this Work Order and made a part hereof by this reference. The SURVEYOR will perform the professional services within the timeframes more particularly set forth in Exhibit A, attached to this Work Order and made a part hereof by this reference all in accordance with the terms and provisions set forth in the Agreement. Nothing contained in any Work Order shall conflict with the terms of the Agreement and the terms of the Agreement shall be deemed to be incorporated in each individual Work Order as if fully set forth herein. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Work Order as of the date first written above. SURVEYOR: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY By: By: M. Scott Sowards Bob Solari, Chairman Print Name: Title: Utility Division Project BCC Approved Date: Manager Attest: Jeffrey R. Smith, Clerk of Court and Comptroller By: Approved: Approved as to form and legal sufficiency: Deputy Clerk Jason E. Brown, County Administrator Dylan T. Reingold, County Attorney 111 Steven L. Anderson, Jr., PSM, PLS Charles M. Arnett, PSM Michael D. Brown, PSM Eric E. Cain, PSM John K. Carr, PSM Michael L. Dougherty, PSM James M. Dunn, II, PSM Thomas F. Ferguson, PSM Ronnie A. Figueroa. PSM, GISP Tate B. Flowers, PSM, PLS Robert W. Gardner, PSM Brian R. Garvey, PE GISP Joseph R. Gore, PLS Daniel J. Henry, PSM, PLS Ryan E. Johnson, PSM Gary B. Krick, PSM (Retired) Brad J. Lashley, PSM, PLS Myron F. Lucas, PSM /t/t///LI UI 1m ,\ Csoetheastent. Suri�e� n /" v Southeastern Surveying and Mapping Corporation Serving the Southeast Since 1972 100% Employee Owned James E. Mazurak, PSM Thomas K. Mead, PSM, PLS Timothy 0. Mosby, PSM Andrew A. Perry, PSM James L. Petersen, PSM William C. Rowe, PSM Tony G. Syfrett, PSM, PLS Thomas P. Young, Jr., PSM, GISP Kirk R. Hall, El, GISP Brad A. Stroppel, El, GISP Brian E. Latchaw, GISP Patrick J. Phillips, GISP Donna L. Hendrix, CST IV Mark W. Klaers, CST IV David M. Rentfrow, CST IV Steve D. Smith, CST IV Land Surveying & Mapping Services • Sub -Surface Utility Designation & Location Services • Geographic Information Systems • GPS Asset Inventories February 21, 2019 Via Email: jbover(a,ircgov.com Mr. John M. Boyer, PE Utilities Engineer IRC Department of Utility Services 1801 27th Street — Building A Vero Beach, FL 32960 (772) 226-1823 RE: IRC Project 1722 — 45th Street Improvements 45th Street — 43rd Street to 58th Avenue Section 28, Township 32 South, Range 39 East, Indian River County, Florida Dear Mr. Boyer, We are pleased to submit our proposal for Subsurface Utility Verification (Penetrating) on the above referenced project. SCOPE OF WORK: 1. Coordinate Sunshine 811 and utility locates to include supplemental calls to each locator to expedite the field marking of each subsurface utility as required by law. 2. Expose the subject utilities by using non-destructive vacuum excavation methods at forty (40) specific locations as indicated on plan sheets provided and marked by client in the field. The Client is to stake test hole locations. 3. Confirm/determine the vertical and horizontal position of the subject utilities and record the information, using the locate marks provided by the utility owners and/or their representatives unless otherwise specifically requested by client. 4. Any asphalt/concrete removed will be repaired using like materials. 5. Tie each test hole location to a minimum of three visible physical features to enable this data to be added to your base map and also enable future recovery. 6. Provide all.M.O.T. required for Test Holes. Permitting for roadway work will be provided by IRC Department of Utility Services. 6500 All American Blvd 1130 Highway 90 Orlando, FL 32810 Chiptey, FL 32428 407.292.8580 850.638.0790 407.292.0141 Fax 850.638.8069 Fax Lakeside Executive Center 8641 Baypine Road Suite 5 Jacksonville, FL 32256 904.737.5990 904.737.5995 Fax 119 West Main Street Tavares, FL 32778 352.343.4880 352.343.4914 Fax 10 East Lake Street Kissimmee, FL 34744 407.944.4880 407.944.0424 Fax University Corporate Park 10770 North 46th Street Suite C-300 Tampa, FL 33617 813.898.2711 813.898.2712 Fax 410 Honeysuckle Road Dothan, AL 36305 334.648.0288 Licenses: PSM: Florida Professional Surveyor & Mapper • PLS: Alabama Professional Land Surveyor • PE: Professional Engineer Certifications: El: Engineering Intern • GISP:: Geographic Information Systems Professional • CST: Certified Survey Technician 112 Page 2 Mr. John M. Boyer, PE IRC Project 1722 — 45th Street Improvements February 21, 2019 The final product will be test hole reports/sketches of the project area reflecting all pertinent data for your use. Terms and Conditions It is understood that the IRC Department of Utility Services construction contractor is responsible to abide by Sunshine 811, Florida State Statutes Chapter 556.106 and all applicable laws, and regulations that pertain to the services provided. IRC Department of Utility Services will make available all plans and utility records that have been obtained for this site. However, the information provided by IRC Department of Utility Services is also dependent upon a Sunshine 811 request for utility owners and/or their representatives to mark their buried underground plant at the project site as required by law. Southeastern Surveying and Mapping Corporation (SSMC) has a right to rely on the accuracy of such plans and utility records and will notify IRC Department of Utility Services if there are any patently or reasonably identifiable defects in the documents. IRC Department of Utility Services is aware that due to the inherent uncertain nature of subsurface utilities, including but not limited to deficient or misrepresentation of prints, SSMC cannot guarantee that all subsurface utility lines will be accounted for. SSMC will ensure that all reasonable efforts are made to identify the location of said underground utilities and provide the best available information within the project area with the use of Ground Penetrating Radar, Electronic Line Locating Equipment and Vacuum Excavation methods, as needed. Additional research will only be conducted by SSMC if requested in writing by IRC Department of Utility Services. In accordance with the Underground Facility Damage Prevention and Safety Act, the Design Engineer shall perform sufficient Utility Coordination with the Utility providers in this location to affirm the information from SSMC's efforts and confirm that no other subsurface utility is possibly undetected by these efforts. SSMC shall not be held liable for any latent or unreasonably discoverable utilities in the project area. Furthermore in the event of a claim regarding the services provided in the proposal, SSMC shall have liability for reasonable and necessary defense costs to the extent caused by SSMC's negligence. M.O.T. will be used only if absolutely necessary and these invoice charges will be an addition to the total per day rate and reflected on our invoice to you. Note: If permitting is required for said work, these charges will also be additional and reflected on our invoice to you. Note: Test Holes that require a depth of greater than ten (10) feet, or require a substantial amount of increased effort (sleeving, shoring, de -watering, etc.), then said Test Holes may need to be negotiated separately on a case by case basis if normal vacuum excavation practices do not allow said utilities to be exposed. Note: All utility sizes given are outside diameter unless otherwise specified and are approximate only due to uncontrollable field conditions that may be encountered during excavation. Note: Any additional overlaying or restoration of pavement, other than the replacement of materials removed and cold patched, will be the responsibility of IRC Department of Utility Services. t:\data\proposal\utility division\irc project 1722 - 45th street improvements_irc dept of utility servs.docx <SoUthea.. ,Survey..in / 1' 1 I t 7 Page 3 Mr. John M. Boyer, PE IRC Project 1722 — 45th Street Improvements February 21, 2019 Our fee for this project will be as follows: Test Holes/Day Rate: $512.00 Dirt/Each (anticipate 13) $571.00 Asphalt/Concrete/Each (anticipate 27) M.O.T. (SSMC) $500.00 per Lane Closure/Day Rate (10) $931.00 per Lane Closure/Night Rate Permitting: (If Required) $103.00 per hour + cost of permit $6,656.00 $15,417.00 $5,000.00 The fee estimate for the proposed scope of services is valid for six (6) months from the date of proposal. We anticipate completion of the above described work within five (5) weeks after receipt of approved permit and written notice to proceed. SSMC will submit monthly invoices electronically via email as an attachment. SSMC requires each client to provide its Accounts Payable contact information along with any invoicing deadlines and requirements per project. Please complete the attached Contact Information Sheet and return to SSMC Project Manager listed below with your signed proposal letter or executed agreement. Payment is due upon completion of the work and prior to release of project information. We accept VISA and MasterCard for your payment convenience. Notice to Owner • For all construction related projects a Notice to Owner will be filed. We look forward to the opportunity to work with you on this project. Sincerely, M. Scott Sowards Utility Division Project Manager MSS:gac t:\data\proposal\utility division\ire project 1722 - 45th street improvcments_irc dept of utility servs.docx fSOuthe`a3 4urveyht Page 4 Mr. John M. Boyer, PE IRC Project 1722 — 45th Street Improvements February 21, 2019 If the above scope, period of service and method of compensation meets with your approval, please execute below and email to SSMC as notice to proceed along with the notice of commencement. If your firm prefers using your own standard PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT in lieu of this proposal letter, this document MUST BE furnished to SSMC, negotiated, and executed prior to the commencement of any service. Send all Agreements to: Orlando Corporate Office 6500 All American Boulevard Orlando, FL 32810. Fax: 407-292-0141 Email: infonsoutheasternsurveying.com Your firm agrees that by (1) signing and returning this Proposal, or (2) partial or complete performance under this Proposal and SSMC has not received, negotiated and/or executed a PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT, then it is agreed that THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS IN THIS PROPOSAL SHALL GOVERN THE SERVICES RENDERED. Furthermore, if requested, your firm acknowledges that by accepting this Proposal, SSMC will provide your firm with an insurance certificate that (1) contains the project name and (2) lists your firm as the certificate holder. The person executing this document must indicate that he/she is a Principal and/or Corporate Officer. If the signatory is not a Principal and/or Corporate Officer, a Letter of Authorization on company letterhead signed by a Principal and/or Corporate Officer, MUST be provided that specifically states that signatory has the authority to bind the parties by entering into this agreement. ACCEPTED BY: Principal / or Corporate Officer Title Printed Name Date t:\data\proposalknility division\irc project 1722 - 45th street improvements_irc dept of utility servs.docx outhea eSouttea erns, Surveyit> C \� rhrltt l Surveying and Mapping Geographic information Systems Subsurface Utility Engineering Serving the Southeast Since 1972 Orlando Corporate Office: 6500 All American Boulevard, Orlando, FL 32810 • (407) 292-8580 Chipley Office: 1130 Highway 90, Chipley, FL 32428 • (850) 638-0790 Jacksonville Office: Lakeside Executive Center, 8641 Baypine Road, Suite #5, Jacksonville, FL 32256 • (904) 737-5990 Kissimmee Office: 10 East Lake Street, Kissimmee, FL 34744 • (407) 944-4880 Tampa Office: University Corporate Park, 10770 North 48th Street, Suite C300, Tampa, FL 33617 • (813) 898-2711 Tavares Office: 119 West Main Street, Tavares, FL 32778 • (352) 343-4880 Alabama Office: 410 Honeysuckle Road, Dothan, AL 36305 • (334) 648-0288 CONTACT INFORMATION SHEET Company Name: Physical Address: Mailing Address: Office Phone: Principal Owner/Manager. Accounts Payable Contact: Accounts Payable Email: Please provide the following information: Fax Number: Email: Phone: Invoicing Deadlines: ❑ Yes 0 No (If yes, please provide your invoice schedule) Return this form via email to info cAsoutheasternsurveyinq.com and the Southeastern Surveying and Mapping Corporation (SSMC) Project Manager upon acceptance of a signed proposal or contract. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact a representative from SSMC and we will be happy to assist you. SSMC Contact Information Accounts Receivable Orlando, Kissimmee, Tampa, & Tavares Tina Via Phone: (407) 292-8580 ext. 2252 Email: tvia(@southeasternsurvevinq.com Leonilla John Phone: (407) 292-8580 ext. 2249 Email: liohn Gnsoutheasternsurveyinq.com Contracts 1 Certificate of Insurance All Offices Rebecca Bess Phone: (407) 292-8580 ext. 2202 Email: rbess(osoutheastemsurveyinq.com Accounts Receivable Chipley Tammy Hicks Phone: (850) 638-0790 ext. 3225 Email: thicks Gnsoutheasternsurveyinq.com File Name: 1\navision\admin\datalformslap contact information sheet (revised).docx Rev. Date: August 31, 2018 Accounts Receivable Jacksonville Savanna Howard Phone: (904) 737-5990 ext. 4301 Email: showard4southeastemsurveyinq.com 116 Consent Agenda Item INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF UTILITY SERVICES Date: March 6, 2019 To: Jason E. Brown, County Administrator From: Vincent Burke, P.E., Director of Utility Services Prepared By: Arjuna Weragoda, P.E., Capital Projects Manager Subject: Work Order No. 1 with Arcadis for Design, Procurement and Construction Administration to Rehabilitate the RAS/WAS Pumps at the Central Wastewater Treatment Plant DESCRIPTIONS AND CONDITIONS: Indian River County Department of Utility Services (IRCDUS) operates the Central Wastewater Treatment Facility (CWWTF) located in Gifford at 3550 49th Street. The expansion to the CWWTF, which included the construction of the clarifiers, was done in 1999. A condition assessment of the facility was conducted recently by Arcadis as a part of the County's asset management program. During this assessment, it was found that the Return Activated Sludge (RAS) Pumps and Waste Activated Sludge (WAS) Pumps as well as the associated piping and valves were in poor condition due to equipment age and environmental corrosion, and are recommended for replacement. ANALYSIS: In January 2019, staff requested Arcadis to submit a proposal for professional engineering services to remedy the RAS/WAS system at the CWWTF. Per the Continuing Consulting Engineering Services Agreement for professional engineering services dated April 17, 2018, Arcadis submitted a proposal for design, bidding assistance and construction management services. Arcadis has submitted Work Order No. 1, which includes providing professional services for design, specifications/bid documents, and construction observation to rehabilitate the RAS/WAS pump system at the Central Wastewater Treatment Facility. The total negotiated cost for the professional services is a sum amount of $66,523. The negotiated cost has been broken into different tasks. The engineers estimated construction cost for these improvements covered in the Scope of Work for Work Order No. 1 will be approximately $370,000.00. FUNDING: Funds for this project are derived from the renewal and replacement budget in the operating fund. Operating funds are generated from water and sewer revenues. 117 Description Account Number Amount CWWTF RAS/WAS Rehabilitation 47123536-044699-19516 $66,523.00 RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners approve Work Order No. 1 with Arcadis, in the amount of $66,523.00, for Professional Services that include design, specifications/bid documents, and construction observation services to rehabilitate the Return Activated Sludge/Waste Activated Sludge pump system at the Central Wastewater Treatment Facility, and authorize the Chairman to execute said work order on their behalf. ATTACHMENT(s): 1. Work Order No.1: RAS and WAS pump replacement (10 Pages) C:\Users\legista r\AppData\Local\Temp\BCL Technologies\easyPDF 8\@BCL@880EFOD8\@BCL@880EF0D8.docx 118 CCNA2018 WORK ORDER 1 RAS and WAS Pump Replacement at the Central WWTP This Work Order Number 1 is entered into as of this 26 day of March, 2019, pursuant to that certain Continuing Consulting Engineering Services Agreement for Professional Services entered into as of this 17th day of April, 2018 (collectively referred to as the "Agreement"), by and between INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Florida ("COUNTY") and Arcadis US ("Consultant"). The COUNTY has selected the Consultant to perform the professional services set forth on Exhibit A (Scope of Work), attached to this Work Order and made part hereof by this reference. The professional services will be performed by the Consultant for the fee schedule set forth in Exhibit B (Fee Schedule), attached to this Work Order and made a part hereof by this reference. The Consultant will perform the professional services within the timeframe more particularly set forth in Exhibit C (Time Schedule), attached to this Work Order and made a part hereof by this reference all in accordance with the terms and provisions set forth in the Agreement. Pursuant to paragraph 1.4 of the Agreement, nothing contained in any Work Order shall conflict with the terms of the Agreement and the terms of the Agreement shall be deemed to be incorporated in each individual Work Order as if fully set forth herein. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Work Order as of the date first written above. CONSULTANT: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY By: 1'-,+'"� By: David O'Connor , Chairman Print Name: Title: Associate V. P. BCC Approved Date: Attest: Jeffrey R. Smith, Clerk of Court and Comptroller By: Approved: Approved as to form and legal sufficiency: Deputy Clerk Jason E. Brown, County Administrator Dylan T. Reingold, County Attorney 119 ATTACHMENT A SCOPE OF SERVICES PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR RAS AND WAS PUMP REPLACEMENT AT THE CENTRAL WASTEWATER PLANT 1 OVERVIEW 1.1 Background Indian River County (COUNTY) operates the 4 MGD Central Region Wastewater Treatment Plant. A condition assessment of the facility was recently completed as a part of the COUNTY asset management program. During this assessment it was found that the Return Activated Sludge (RAS) Pumps and Waste Activated Sludge (WAS) Pumps and associated piping and valves were in poor condition due to equipment age and environmental corrosion and are recommended for replacement. The COUNTY has requested a proposal from Arcadis U.S., Inc. (CONSULTANT) to provide professional engineering services for design, phasing plan for operations and bidding, and limited construction administration services. The proposed work will be authorized as a task order under the existing General Professional Services Agreement, between the COUNTY and CONSULTANT, dated February 24, 2017. The terms and conditions of the referenced Contract apply. 1.2 Design Concept The general design concept as discussed on a call between COUNTY and CONSULTANT on January 9, 2019 is as follows: • Replace existing RAS and WAS Pumps with new pumps of equal capacity and head of the pumps being replaced • Replace existing piping, valves and sensors associated with the RAS and WAS pumps • Replace existing seal water piping at pumps • Develop phasing plan for construction to ensure continued operation • Develop bid documents, provide pre-bid support, and bid recommendation • Provide limited construction administration services • Produce record drawings based on contractor supplied "as builts" and conditions observed during site visits 120 2 SCOPE OF WORK 2.1 Task 1 — Project Management The CONSULTANT will provide the following services throughout the duration of the project as needed: • Coordination between CONSULTANT Project Team and COUNTY Project Team. • Manage project schedule and budget. • Prepare and distribute agendas and support documentation for project meetings and workshops. • Prepare and distribute meeting summaries from project meetings and workshops. • Prepare and submit monthly progress reports and invoices. • Preparation and implementation of Quality Control Plan and CAD Plan Deliverables: • Meeting Summaries • Monthly Progress Reports • Monthly Invoices 2.2 Task 2 —Project Kickoff and Site Visit CONSULTANT shall prepare and lead one project kickoff meeting with appropriate COUNTY staff to review the scope of work, project schedule, data needs and key milestones. Prior to the kickoff meeting, CONSULTANT will submit a proposed agenda that will include: (1) items to be discussed, (2) specific questions to be answered, and (3) additional data requests. Immediately following the project kickoff meeting, CONSULTANT and COUNTY will conduct a walkthrough of the RAS/WAS Pumps to gather necessary information on the system configuration and operation. The team will obtain input on the design, operational and maintenance issues, and will interview staff to identify RAS/WAS system constraints and requirements. 2.3 Task 3 — Basis of Design 2.3.1 Draft Preliminary Design Technical Memorandum Utilizing information obtained from the kickoff meeting, site visit and data provided by the OWNER, CONSULTANT will assess and confirm the limits of the replacement needs for the associated piping, valves, wiring and appurtenances associated with the RAS/WAS Pumps. CONSULTANT will review available information on the existing RAS/WAS Pumps, including as -built drawings, equipment cut sheets, and historical operating data to establish replacement requirements for the new pumps. As part of this assessment, CONSULTANT will identify up to three suitable pump/motor manufacturers that can meet the 121 performance and retrofit requirements to replace the existing pumps within the existing site with minimal modifications and have the manufacturer provide a list of installations of their equipment within Florida. CONSULTANT will develop concept level construction costs for the replacement of the pumps along with a preliminary construction schedule and phasing plan that will allow for construction/replacement work to occur while the Central Wastewater Plant is maintained in service. CONSULTANT will prepare a draft Preliminary Design Technical Memorandum summarizing the findings and recommendations of the pump replacement assessment. The memorandum will be submitted to the COUNTY for review and comment. An electronic copy (.pdf) of the draft memorandum will be submitted to the COUNTY. Task 2.3.2 Meeting to Review Draft Technical Memorandum Within about two weeks after the draft technical memorandum submittal, CONSULTANT will lead a meeting with the COUNTY to review the information presented in the memorandum and gather OWNER comments. The meeting will serve as an open forum to discuss preliminary design issues, including equipment preferences. Task 2.3.3 Final Preliminary Design Technical Memorandum Upon receiving comments at the review meeting, CONSULTANT will finalize the preliminary design recommendations and prepare and submit a Final Preliminary Design Technical Memorandum. An electronic copy (.pdf) of the final memorandum will be submitted to the COUNTY. 2.4 Task 4 — Detailed Design Based upon the recommendations presented in the Preliminary Design Technical Memorandum, the CONSULTANT will develop design documents. These design documents will consist of Contract Drawings and Technical Specifications and will be incorporated by the COUNTY into a bid package for public procurement. The COUNTY'S Standard "front end" documents consisting of General Conditions will be utilized. Contract Drawings will be prepared in AutoCAD 2018 or later version. Technical Specifications will follow the MasterFormat® 2016 from the Construction Specifications Institute (CSI). The Final Design will be delivered at two stages of completion to allow for input by the COUNTY. The stages will be 90% and 100%/Bid Ready. At each stage, an engineer's opinion of probable construction cost (EOPCC) will be provided. 122 2.4.1 90% Design CONSULTANT will prepare a 90% design submittal composed of contract drawings (11"x 17") and draft technical specifications and bid form. Five hard copies of the 90% design package and one electronic copy will be submitted to the COUNTY for review. 2.4.2 90% Design Submittal Review Meeting CONSULTANT will prepare and lead one meeting to review the 90% design submittal and discuss COUNTY comments within about two weeks after the submittal of the 90% contract documents. CONSULTANT will prepare and distribute a meeting agenda and minutes documenting comments and action items from the design review meeting. 2.4.3 100% Design/Bid submittal Based on the comments received from the COUNTY on the 90% design submittal, CONSULTANT will prepare a 100%/Bid design submittal composed of contract drawings (11" x 17") and final technical specifications and bid form. CONSULTANT will provide five hard copies and an electronic copy in .pdf format of the final specifications and plans. 2.4.4 Construction Cost Estimates and Schedule An opinion of probable construction costs and schedule will be prepared for each of the 90% and 100% (final opinion of construction cost) submittals. The opinion of construction costs will utilize appropriate contingency factors for the level of completion at the various design stages. 2.4.5 QA/QC Quality Assurance/Quality Control: The CONSULTANT will provide quality assurance and quality control (QA/QC) reviews at each major milestone deliverable (90%) of the project. For this service, the CONSULTANT will utilize the services of senior and/or experienced professional engineers across the disciplines represented in the design. The professionals, who will make up the QA/QC Team, will purposely be staff not routinely engaged in the project. The QA/QC Team will prepare written comments at the appropriate stages of the design that will be incorporated into revised documents. 2.5 Task 5 — Bidding Services The COUNTY will procure services from a qualified General Contractor (GC) through a public procurement process. The CONSULTANT will provide the following services in connection with the public procurement: 1. Attend a pre-bid meeting and site visit. COUNTY to prepare and publish all addenda and clarifications. 123 2. Prepare draft responses to requests for information from prospective bidders. Prepare responses for addenda to interpret, clarify or expand the contract documents 3. CONSULTANT will contact up to two references of the apparent low bid contractor to assess qualifications. 4. Prepare a conformed set of drawings and specifications incorporating revisions from addenda during the bidding phase. COUNTY to confirm bids are compliant with the bid requirements. COUNTY to provide compiled Microsoft Excel file with each bidder's cost information. Alternative equipment proposed by potential bidders will not be evaluated by CONSULTANT during the bidding process. Deliverables: • Written responses to questions received during bidding process via email • Bid evaluation letter • Conformed documents (final pdf digitally signed and sealed) 2:6 Task 6 — Construction Management Services The following construction phase services are predicated on one construction contract with an estimated 6 -month construction duration to substantial completion. Full-time onsite observation of construction or resident project representative (RPR) services are not included. 2.6.1 Meetings and Site Visits The CONSULTANT shall arrange and lead a construction kickoff meeting, during which the COUNTY, the CONSULTANT and the contractor shall discuss project requirements, define responsibilities, and receive the contractor's plan to complete the work. The CONSULTANT shall conduct up to six 4 -hour site visits during the replacement of the pumps to confirm the work appears to be proceeding in accordance with the design. Upon substantial completion of the work, the CONSULTANT shall conduct a site visit with the Contractor and COUNTY to develop a punch list of outstanding work items. Upon completion of the work, the CONSULTANT shall conduct a final site visit to confirm the work is in conformance with the contract documents. The CONSULTANT shall submit a summary report following each site visit. 2.6.2 Construction Administration The contractor will prepare shop drawings for the selected equipment and other components of the work as specified in the contract documents. These shop -drawing submittals will be reviewed by the CONSULTANT for compliance with the design concept and contract requirements. The CONSULTANT shall provide a recommendation on the submittal to the OWNER. 124 The CONSULTANT shall also receive and respond to contractor Requests for Information (RFI) or request for clarification of the contract documents or design intent. The CONSULTANT 2.6.3 Startup Assistance The CONSULTANT shall assist the OWNER and the contractor during checkout, startup and commissioning. It is anticipated that installation, startup and acceptance will be completed one pump at a time to ensure the facility can remain operational throughout construction. CONSULTANT startup and testing assistance will include presence at startup testing; providing technical guidance during operational confirmation and acceptance testing; and reviewing test data. The CONSULTANT shall be available for a one four-hour day for startup and testing. Review of Contractor Pay Applications is not included in this scope of services. 2.7 Task 8 — Post -Construction Activities The CONSULTANT will provide the following services during and subsequent to the completion of the construction: 2.7.1 Record Drawings: CONSULTANT will prepare final record drawings from the Contractor supplied "as -built" information. The CONSULTANT provide COUNTY with one PDF set. 3 SCHEDULE A preliminary schedule of the work (calendar days from notice to proceed) is summarized below. The schedule is based upon a notice to proceed (NTP) date of February 8, 2019. Table 3. Preliminary Schedule Milestone Completion Ctaa Completion Notice to Proceed (NTP) 0 25 -Mar -19 Kick-off 14 14 8 -Apr -19 Draft TM 30 44 8 -May -19 County Review 14 58 22 -May -19 125 Final TM 30 88 21 -Jun -19 90% Submittal 60 148 20 -Aug -19 County Review 14 162 3 -Sep -19 100%/Bid Ready Submittal 21 183 24 -Sep -19 Bidding Services As needed Construction As needed (estimated 6 Management Services months of construction) 4 COMPENSATION AND METHOD OF PAYMENT The compensation to be paid to the CONSULTANT for providing the services described in the above scope of work will be on a "lump sum by task" basis as described in the breakdown provided in the Attached Fee Schedule. The lump sum compensation for labor services shall not exceed $66,523. The CONSULTANT may adjust budget between tasks as needed, if the total lump sum is not exceeded. The CONSULTANT will submit invoices to the COUNTY's Project Manager for work performed during each calendar month. Invoicing will be accompanied by a brief description of the work effort completed during the billing period. 5 ASSUMPTIONS/EXCLUSIONS The following text describes the assumptions made in the creation of this scope of services and the estimated engineering services fee for this project. Should the scope of the work of the project exceed these assumptions, the CONSULTANT may request additional fees. Assumptions include: • No permits are required • The COUNTY will provide available record drawing of the existing facilities • Resident Inspection will be performed by the COUNTY or another designated representative. • Verification of construction activities will be performed by the COUNTY or other designated representative. • Construction and field reports will be developed by the COUNTY or other designated representative. 126 FEE SCHEDULE IRC RAS WAS Fee Estlmabe_drea Indian River County Central Wastewater Plant RASNJAS Pump Replacement Design Fee Estimate 9 Owner's Allowance Principalry Sr. Project Manager Sr. Mechanical / Civil / Environmental Engineer Sr Bectdcal Engineer Engineer (Mechanical / Civil / Environmenteal Electrical Engineer Designer CADD Drafter Total Hours Total Labor Cost Expense. Total Cost s:1gel Owner's Allowance O'Connor MID CEP _ C Mg ail= =KO 'CD $0 50 TASK DESCRITION 1 Project Management 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 50 Total Hours and Fee 8 Monthly Invoice and Status Reports 2 8 160 88 76 0 444 564,773 10 52,163 5250 52,413 5416.30 576876 5168.36 5738.00 5138.00 599.33 563.42 Task 1 -Total Hours 2 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 $2,163 $250 $2,413 2 Data Collection Kick -o0 Meeting 4 4 4 12 $2.091 $2,091 As -built review 8 8 16 51,899 $1,899 Task 2- Total Hours 0 4 4 0 12 0 8 0 28 $3,989 50 $3,989 3 Basis of Design Report MechanicaWard Piping 4 32 36 55,089 $5,089 Electrical/18C 4 16 20 52,881 32,881 Prepp Preliminary Design TM (Draft end Final) 8 8 51,104 31,104 QAIQC 2 2 4 $865 $865 Task 3 - Total Hours 2 2 4 4 40 16 0 0 68 59 940 50 59,940 4 Design 90% Design MechanicalNard Piping 8 24 24 0 56 $7,043 $7,043 BectricalA&C 18 24 16 58 $7,932 57,932 QC 2 4 6 $1.298 90% Total 2 4 8 18 24 24 40 0 114 516,272 $0 516,272 100% Design (Bid Ready) MechanicalNard Piping 4 8 12 24 $2,969 $2,969 EIectricelABC 4 8 12 51,777 51,777 QC 2 4 6 $1,298 100%Total 2 4 4 4 8 8 120 42 56,045 56,045 Task 4 -Total Hours 4 8 12 22 32 32 52 0 162 $22,317 50 $22,317 5 Permitting Building Department 0 0 00 50 FDEP Construction Permit 0 So 30 Task S- Totol Hours 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 50 6 Bidding Services -- " -- -- - Pre -Bid Conference 4 4 8 51,417 5500 51,917 Respond to Bidders RFIs 2 4 8 14 52,210 52,210 Review Bids 2 4 6 $985 5985 Conform Documents 2 2 4 8 16 52,116 52,116 Task 6 - Total Hours 0 10 0 6 20 0 8 0 44 56,728 500 57,228 7 Construction Administration Meetings and Site Visits 4 _ _ 4 4 24 _ 24 60 $8,836 51,000 59,836 Submittal Review 2 16 16 34 $4,849 RFI Response 2 4 4 4 14 $2,331 Startup 2 4 4 10 01,779 51,779 Task 7 -Total Hours 0 10 12 12 44 40 0 0 118 $17,796 81,000 518,796 8 Post Construction Services Record Drawings 2 2 2 8 14 51,840 $1,840 Ta1c-li:Tofaf7lours - 0 2 0 2 2 0 6 -0- 14 51,840 58 81,84b 9 Owner's Allowance Owner's Allowance $0 50 Task 9- Total Hours 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 50 Total Hours and Fee 8 44 32 46 160 88 76 0 444 564,773 $1,750 566,623 Project Billable Rates 5216.30 5416.30 576876 5168.36 5738.00 5138.00 599.33 563.42 $ ,144. o.00 128 1 011 3/19/2019 Consent Agenda Item INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF UTILITY SERVICES Date: To: From: Through: Prepared By: Subject: March 26, 2019 Jason E. Brown, County Administrator Vincent Burke, P.E., Director of Utility Services Cindy Corrente, Utilities Finance Manager Rita Strickland, Utilities Accountant Paymentus Merchant Services Banking Documents DESCRIPTIONS AND CONDITIONS: On December 18, 2018, the Board of County Commissioners (BCC) approved Paymentus as the Indian River County Department of Utility Services (IRCDUS) merchant service provider and authorized the Chairman to endorse the Paymentus Master Services Agreement, after review and approval by the County Attorney's, office. The attached documents were reviewed by the County Attorney's office, who has recommended that the BCC Chairman sign the documents. FUNDING: There are no additional funds needed for the attached documents to be signed. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners authorize the Chairman to endorse the documents from Paymentus. ATTACHMENTS: Paymentus Master Services Agreement Chase — Additional Company Application Paymentus —ACH Origination Addendum Chase — Government Owned Addendum Chase—Submitter Merchant Payment Processing Instructions and Guidelines 129 Page 1 of 1 Pay (11 entails MASTER SERVICES AGREEMENT Client: Client Address: Contact for Notices to Client: Estimated Yearly Bills / Invoices: Indian River County Department of Utility Services, Florida 1801 27th Street, Vero Beach, Florida 32960 Cindy Corrente, Utility Finance Manager 528,000 This Master Services Agreement ("Master Agreement") is entered into as of the Effective Date below , by and between the Client ("Client") identified above and Paymentus Corporation, a Delaware Corporation ("Paymentus"). WHEREAS Paymentus desires to provide and the Client desires to receive certain services under the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement. Paymentus provides electronic bill payment services to utilities, municipalities, insurance and other businesses. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants hereinafter set forth, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties, intending to be legally bound, hereby covenant and agree as follows. This Agreement consists of this signature page, General Terms and Conditions, and the attachments ("Attachments") with schedules ("Schedules") listed below: Schedule A: Paymentus Service Fee Schedule This Agreement represents the entire understanding between the parties hereto with respect to its subject matter and supersedes all other written or oral agreements heretofore made by or on behalf of Paymentus or Client with respect to the subject matter hereof and may be changed only by agreements in writing signed by the authorized representatives of the parties. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Agreement to be executed by their duly authorized representatives. Y COAi,'p'.. Ti;moo �(.y. *-.6:i".. . ; 4 Client: INDIAN RIVER CO1JW�� � ':" _ Paymentus: B j Y tgr> *1 B n C Name: Bob Solari �T�-, '{f$` ..‘)C• d;=� Name: /r'1�9�/C S4L,4� ''�' 9u QTY, . Title: Chairman Title: Date: December 18, 2018 Date: /? ^ /7 r ZiV,K- ATTEST: Jeffrey R. Smith, Clerk of Court //nand Comp roller. APPROVED AS TO FORM BY: [�/+ ���,/l ri; AD LEGAL SUFFICIENCY 'Deputy Clerk ` Master Services Agreement - Absorbed Confidential & Proprietary BY DYLAN REINGOLD COUNTY ATTORNEY Page 1 of 8 100205 130 Paymentus GENERAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS 1 Definitions: For the purposes of this Agreement, the following terms and words shall have the meaning ascribed to them, unless the context clearly indicates otherwise. 1.1 "Agreement " or "Contract" shall refer to this Agreement, as amended from time to time, which shall constitute an authorization for the term of this contract for Paymentus to be the exclusive provider of services, stated herein, to the Client 1.2 "User" shall mean the users of the Client's services 1.3 "Effective Date" shall be the last date upon which the parties signed this Agreement. The Agreement will not be effective against any party until the said date 1.4 "Launch Date" shall be the date on which Client launches this service to the Users 1.5 "Payment" shall mean Users to make payments for Client's services or Client's bills 1.6 "Payment Amount" shall mean the bill amount User wants to pay to the Client. 1.7 "Services" shall include the performance of the Services outlined in section 2 of this Agreement 1.8 "Paymentus Authorized Processor" shall mean a Paymentus authorized merchant account provider and payment processing gateway 1.9 "Average Bill Amount" shall mean the total amount of Payments collected through Paymentus system in a given month dividedbythe number of the Payments for the same month. 2 Description of Services to be performed 2.1 Scope of Services Paymentus shall provide Users the opportunity to make Payments by Visa, MasterCard, Discover, E -check and other payment methods as deemed necessary by Paymentus. Payments may be made by Interactive Telephone Voice Response Master Services Agreement — Absorbed Confidential & Proprietary System ("IVR") or secure Internet interface provided at the Paymentus Corporation's web site or other websites part of Paymentus' Instant Payment Network ("WebSites"), collectively referred to as the ("System" or "Platform"). 2.2 Professionalism Paymentus shall perform in a professional manner all Services required to be performed under this Agreement. 3 Compensation 3.1 No Cost Installation Paymentus will charge no fees related to the initial setup and personalization of its standard service for both Web and IVR interfaces. 3.2 Paymentus Service Fee For each payment, Paymentus will charge a Paymentus Service Fee as per Schedule A (hereinafter called "Paymentus Service Fee"). 4 Payment Processing 4.1 Integration with Client's Billing System At no cost to Client, Paymentus will develop one (1) file format interface with Client's billing system using Client's existing text file format currently used to post payments to Client's billing system. Client will be responsible to provide Paymentus with the one file format specification and will fully cooperate with Paymentus during the development of the said interface. If Client chooses to create an automated file integration process to download the posting file, due to Paymentus security requirements, Client will use Paymentus specified integration process. Paymentus platform is an independent full service fully hosted platform per PCI -DSS requirements for a fully hosted solution. As such, Paymentus platform does and can function independent of any billing system integration. A payment posting file can be emailed or downloaded from Paymentus Agent Dashboard. If Client chooses to have Paymentus platform integrated with its billing system, Paymentus offers two options: Page 2 of 8 100205 131 Pay r ? onto (i) Paymentus standard integration specification that Client can use to integrate its billing systems with Paymentus platform ("Standard Integration"); (or) (ii) Paymentus to either customize or configure its platform to integrate with Client using file specification or APIs supported by Client's billing system ("Client Specific Integration") If Client chooses Standard Integration, Paymentus agrees to fully cooperate with Client and -provide its specification to Client. Paymentus also agrees to participate in meetings with Client's software vendor to provide any information or clarifications needed to understand Standard Integration. If Client chooses Client Specific Integration, Paymentus agrees to develop such integration at no cost to Client, provided however, Client agrees to fully cooperate with Paymentus and cause its software vendors to fully cooperate with Paymentus. Client agrees to provide all specification required for Client specific integration. Client further agrees to participate in testing with Paymentus and if needed, cause its billing software vendors to participate in testing. Based on Client's use of Paymentus platform and respective modules selected under this Agreement, Paymentus will require the following integration points: (i) For one time Payment Module: a. Customer Information — Text File or Real- time b. Payment Posting — Text File or Real-time (ii) For Recurring Payment Module a. Text File (iii) For E -billing Module a. Billing Data - Text File or Real-time link to billing data (iv) For ECM Module a. Audience File — Text File for customer engagement messages Each of these can be based on Standard Integration or Client Specific Integration. Should the Client choose to change billing systems during the term of this agreement, Paymentus agrees to establish the requisite integration with the new billing system at no cost to the Client. 4.2 PCI Compliance Master Services Agreement — Absorbed Confidential & Proprietary For PCI Compliance, Client has two options for using Paymentus platform: (i) Paymentus Fully Hosted Solution ;or (ii) Any other configuration To substantially reduce or eliminate any PCI compliance risks and to render all Client systems out of scope from PCI compliance requirements, Client agrees to use Paymentus' fully hosted service where Paymentus uses its own platform to capture Payments and to manage the entire (end to end) user experience from all channels for Payment acceptance: Web, Mobile, IVR, POS devices, recurring payments, Ebill Presentment ("Paymentus Fully Hosted Solution"). If Client chooses any other integration such as third party web pages integrated with Paymentus APIs, third party gateway pages, or its own IVR systems or POS solution not provided by Paymentus, or a cashiering module from third party, Client expressly agrees that Client shall not be exempt from PCI requirements and shall be liable for any data breaches occurring at its own systems as Client's recognizes that Client systems are participating in the transactions and are in scope for PCI compliance. Under such circumstances, Paymentus shall not be responsible for any PCI obligations outside of Paymentus own Platform and Paymentus expressly disclaims any PCI or security obligations related to Client systems or any third party systems that participate in the payment transactions. Paymentus highly recommends that Client uses Paymentus Fully Hosted Solution to substantially reduce its PCI compliance and data breach risks. If Client chooses to use any other option other than Paymentus Fully Hosted Solution, Client agrees and warrants that Client shall remain PCI compliant throughout the term of this Agreement. For clarity, just because Client uses PCI compliant applications such as its billing software, it does not eliminate the need for Client to be PCI compliant For clarity, if Client systems are participating in payment transactions in any form, Client systems fall within PCI compliance scope. 4.3 Explicit User Confirmation Paymentus shall confirm the dollar amount of all Payments to be charged to a Card and electronically obtain the User approval of such charges prior to initiating Card authorizations transaction. Paymentus will provide User with electronic confirmation of all transactions. Page 3 of 8 100205 132 Pay, entus 4.4 Merchant Account Paymentus will arrange for the Client to have a merchant account with the Paymentus Authorized Processor for processing and settlement of the credit card transactions. 4.5 Card Authorization For authorization purposes, Paymentus will electronically transmit all Card transactions to the appropriate card associations in real time as the transactions occur. 4.6 Settlement Paymentus together with its authorized Card processor shall forward the payment transactions to the appropriate card organizations for settlement directly to the Client's depository bank account previously designated by the Client (hereinafter the "Client Bank Account"). Paymentus will debit the Paymentus Service Fees from Client's account on a monthly basis. Paymentus together with Paymentus Authorized Processor will continuously review its settlement and direct debit processes for its simplicity and efficiencies. Client and Paymentus agree to fully co- operate with each other if Paymentus were to change its settlement and invoicing processes. 5 General Conditions of Services 5.1 Service Reports Paymentus shall provide Client with reports summarizing use of the Services by Users for a given reporting period. 5.2 User Adoption Communication by Client Client will make Paymentus' Services available to its residential and commercial Clients by different means of Client communication including a) through bills, invoices and other notices; b) by providing IVR and Web payment details on the Client's website including a "Pay Now" or similar link on a mutually agreed prominent place on the web site; c) through Client's general IVR/Phone system; and d) other channels deemed, appropriate by the Client. Paymentus shall provide Client with logos, graphics and other marketing materials for Client's use in its communications with its users regarding the Services and/or Paymentus. Master Services Agreement — Absorbed Confidential & Proprietary Both parties agree that Paymentus will be presented as a payment method option. Client will communicate Paymentus option to its end residential and commercial Clients wherever Client usually communicates its other payment methods. 5.3 Independent Contractor Client and Paymentus agree and understand that the relationship between both parties is that of an independent contractor. 5.4 Client's Responsibilities In order for Paymentus to provide Services outlined in this Agreement, the Client shall co-operate with Paymentus by: (i) Client will enter into all applicable merchant Card or cash management agreements. (ii) For the duration of this Agreement, Client will keep a bill payment link connecting to Paymentus System at a prominent and mutually agreed location on the Client website. The phone number for the IVR payment will also be added to the web site. Client will also add the IVR payment option as part of the Client's general phone system. (iii) User Adoption marketing as described in 5.2. (iv) Within 120 days of the merchant account setup, Client will launch the service to the Users. (v) For the purpose of providing Client a posting file for posting to Client's billing system, Client will provide the file format specification currently used to post its payments to the billing system. Client will fully cooperate with Paymentus and provide the information required to integrate with Client's billing system. 6 Governing Laws This Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the state of Florida. 7 Communications 7.1 Authorized Representative Each party shall designate an individual to act as a representative for the respective party, with the authority to transmit instructions and receive Page 4 of 8 100205 133 Paymentus information. The parties may from time to time designate other individuals or change the individuals. 7.2 Notices All notices of any type hereunder shall be in writing and shall be given by Certified Mail or by a national courier or by hand delivery to an individual authorized to receive mail for the below listed individuals, all to the following individuals at the following locations: To Client C/O: Cindy Corrente Address: 1801 27th Street, Vero Beach, Florida 32960 Email:ccorrente@ircgov.com To Paymentus C/O: President and CEO Address: 13024 Ballantyne Corporate Place Suite 450 Charlotte, NC 28277 Email: ceoa.pavmentus.com Notices shall be declared to have been given or received on the date the notice is physically received if given by hand delivery, or if notices given by US Post, then notice shall be deemed to have been given upon on date said notice was deposited in the mail addressed in the manner set forth above. Any party hereto by giving notice in the manner set forth herein may unilaterally change the name of the person to whom notice is to be given or the address at which the notice is to be received. 7.3 Amendment of Agreement Modifications or changes in this Agreement must be in writing and executed by the parties bound to this Agreement. 7.4 Severability If a word, sentence or paragraph herein shall be declared illegal, unenforceable, or unconstitutional, the said word, sentence or paragraph shall be severed from this Agreement, and this Agreement shall be read as if said word, sentence or paragraph did not exist. 7.5 Attorney's Fees Should any litigation arise concerning this Agreement between the parties hereto, the parties agree to bear their own costs and attorney's fees. Master Services Agreement — Absorbed Confidential & Proprietary 7.6 Confidentiality Unless required by law, client will not disclose to any third party or use for any purpose inconsistent with this Agreement any confidential or proprietary non-public information it obtains during the term of this Agreement about Paymentus' business, operations, financial condition, technology, systems, no -how, products, services, suppliers, Clients, marketing data, plans, and models, and personnel. Paymentus will not disclose to any third party or use for any purpose inconsistent with this Agreement any confidential User information it receives in connection with its performance of the services. 7.7 Intellectual Property In order that the Client may promote the Services and Paymentus' role in providing the Services, Paymentus grants to Client a revocable, non-exclusive, royalty -free, license to use Paymentus' logo and other service marks (the "Paymentus Marks") for such purpose only. Client does not have any right, title, license or interest, express or implied in and to any object code, software, hardware, trademarks, service mark, trade name, formula, system, know-how, telephone number, telephone line, domain name, URL, copyright image, text, script (including, without limitation, any script used by Paymentus on the IVR or the WebSite) or other intellectual property right of Paymentus ("Paymentus Intellectual Property"). All Paymentus Marks, Paymentus Intellectual Property, and the System and all rights therein (other than rights expressly granted herein) and goodwill pertain thereto belong exclusively to Paymentus. 7.8 Force Majeure Paymentus will be excused from performing the Services as contemplated by this Agreement to the extent its performance is delayed, impaired or rendered impossible by acts of God or other events that are beyond Paymentus' reasonable control and without its fault or judgment, including without limitation, natural disasters, war, terrorist acts, riots, acts of a governmental entity (in a sovereign or contractual capacity), fire, storms, quarantine restrictions, floods, explosions, labor strikes, labor walk -outs, extra -ordinary losses utilities (including telecommunications services), external computer "hacker" attacks, and/or delays of common carrier. 7.9 Time of the Essence Paymentus and Client acknowledge and agree that time is of the essence for the completion of Page 5 of 8 100205 134 P ym oWais the Services to be performed and each parties respective obligations under this Agreement. 8 Indemnification 8.1 Paymentus Indemnification and Hold Harmless Paymentus agrees to the fullest extent permitted by law, to indemnify and hold harmless the Client and its governing officials, agents, employees, and attorneys (collectively, the "Client Indemnitees") from and against all liabilities, demands, losses, damages, costs or expenses (including reasonable attorney's fees and costs), incurred by any Client lndemnitee as a result or arising out of (i) the willful misconduct or negligence of Paymentus in performing the Services or (ii) a material breach by Paymentus of its covenants. 8.2 Client Indemnification and Hold Harmless Client agrees to the limit set forth in Florida Statutes Section 768.28, to indemnify and hold harmless Paymentus, its affiliates, officers, directors, stockholders, agents, employees, and representatives, (collectively, the "Paymentus Indemnitees") from and against all liabilities, demands, losses, damages, costs or expenses (including without limitation reasonable attorney's fees and expenses) incurred by any Paymentus Indemnitee as a result or arising out of (i) the willful misconduct or negligence of Client related to the Services or (ii) a material breach of Client's covenants. 8.3 Warranty Disclaimer Except as expressly set forth in this Agreement, Paymentus disclaims all other representations or warranties, express or implied, made to the Client or any other person, including without limitation, any warranties regarding quality, suitability, merchantability, fitness, for a particular purpose or otherwise of any services or any good provided incidental to the Services provided under this Agreement. 8.4 Limitation of Liability Notwithstanding the foregoing, the parties agree that neither party shall be liable to the other for any lost profits, lost savings or other special, indirect or consequential damages, even if the party has been advised of or could have foreseen the possibility of such damages. Master Services Agreement — Absorbed Confidential & Proprietary 9 Term and Termination 9.1 Term The term of this Agreement shall commence on the effective date of this Agreement and continue for a period of 5 (five) years ("Initial Term") from the Launch Date. At the end of the Initial Term, the client will have the option to renew for 3 successive three (3) year periods with prior written notice. 9.2 Termination in Regard to F.S. 287.135 Paymentus certifies that it and those related entities of respondent as defined by Florida law are not on the Scrutinized Companies that Boycott Israel List, created pursuant to s. 215.4725 of the Florida Statutes, and are not engaged in a boycott of Israel. Client may terminate this Contract if Paymentus, including all wholly owned subsidiaries, majority- owned subsidiaries, and parent companies that exist for the purpose of making profit, is found to have been placed on the Scrutinized Companies that Boycott Israel List or is engaged in a boycott of Israel as set forth in Section 215.4725, Florida Statutes. Page 6 of 8 100205 135 Pay entus Material Breach A material breach of this Agreement shall be cured within 90 (ninety) days ("Cure Period") after a party notifies the other of such breach. In the event, such material breach has not been cured within the Cure Period, the non -breaching party can terminate this Agreement by providing the other party with a 30 (thirty) days notice. 9.3 Upon Termination Upon termination of this Agreement, the parties agree to cooperate with one another to ensure that all Payments are accounted for and all refundable transactions have been completed. Upon termination, Paymentus shall cease all Services being provided hereunder unless otherwise directed by the Client in writing. 10 Public Records Compliance Client is a public agency subject to Chapter 119, Florida Statutes. Payment shall comply with Florida's Public Records Law. Specifically, Paymentus shall: (1) Keep and maintain public records required by the Client to perform the service. (2) Upon request from the Client's Custodian of Public Records, provide the Client with a copy of the requested records or allow the records to be inspected or copied within a reasonable time at a cost that does not exceed the cost provided in Chapter 119 or as otherwise provided by law. (3) Ensure that public records that are exempt or confidential and exempt from public records disclosure requirements are not disclosed except as authorized by law for the duration of the contract term and following completion of the contract if the contractor does not transfer the records to the Client. Master Services Agreement — Absorbed Confidential & Proprietary (4) Upon completion of the contract, transfer, at no cost, to the Client all public records in possession of Paymentus or keep and maintain public records required by the Client to perform the service. If Paymentus transfers all public records to the Client upon completion of the contract, Paymentus shall destroy any duplicate public records that are exempt or confidential and exempt from public records disclosure requirements. If Paymentus keeps and maintains public records upon completion of the contract, Paymentus shall meet all applicable requirements for retaining public records. All records stored electronically must be provided to the Client, upon request from the Custodian of Public Records, in a format that is compatible with the information technology systems of the Client. IF PAYMENTUS HAS QUESTIONS REGARDING THE APPLICATION OF CHAPTER 119, FLORIDA STATUTES, TO THE PAYMENTUS' DUTY TO PROVIDE PUBLIC RECORDS RELATING TO THIS CONTRACT, CONTACT THE CUSTODIAN OF PUBLIC RECORDS AT: (772) 226-1424 publicrecords a(�ircgov.com Office of the County Attorney 1801 27th Street Vero Beach, FL 32960 Failure of the Contractor to comply with these requirements shall be a material breach of this Agreement. Page 7 of 8 100205 136 Paymentus Schedule A — Paymentus Service Fee Schedule Paymentus Service Fee charged to the Client will be based on the following model: Absorbed Fee Model Absorbed Model Average Bill Amount: $57.00 Paymentus Service Fee • Full Pass through of Interchange and Assessments for all Credit/Debit Cards (Visa, MasterCard, American Express, Discover) plus $0.44 per authorization • $0.00 per ACH/eCheck for one-time echeck payments and the option to add auto -payments from legacy solutions pre -loaded or starting as new Solution Components include: • Online One Time Payment • Self -Service Customer Portal • Pay-by-Email/Secure PDF eBilling • IVR/Automated Phone Payments • Text -2 -Pay • Paperless eBilling o Outbound Customer Notifications • Staff Portal & Agent Dashboard O Paymentus Payment Processing Services • Point 2 Point Counter/POS payments Note: Maximum Amount per Payment is $2,000.00. Multiple payments can be made. Paymentus may apply different limits per transactions for user adoption or to mitigate risks. Chargebacks will be billed at $9.95 each. Includes unlimited outbound messages per month. Indian River will work with AUS to provide the updated API for Paymentus. Encrypted card readers will be provided at the request of the County for $225.00 each; the first five will be billed at no charge. Master Services Agreement — Absorbed Confidential & Proprietary Page 8 of 8 100205 137 ADDITIONAL COMPANY APPLICATION CHASE 0 J.P. Morgan SECTION 1: COMPANY INFORMATION To help prevent the funding of terrorism and money laundering require us to obtain, verity, and record information that identifies each person who opens an account. In order ask for your business name, physical address, and government identification number in order to verify your identity. Legal Name Of Company To Be Amended To The Agreement County of Indian River — Board of County Commissioners activities, Federal law and JPMC policies to comply with these requirements, we will Business Start / Date of Incorporation 06/29/1925 (MM/DD/YYYY) Physical Address (No PO Box or Paid Mail Box) 1801 27th St. Taxpayer ID/EIN 59-6000674 City Vero Beach State FL Zip Code 32960 Registered Trade Name (DBA Name) Primaryeontact Cindy Corrente Telephone Number (with area code) 772-226-1832 Date of Birth Ownership: Stock Exchange Ticker Symbol Telephone if Subsidiary of Public Company 111 Public Ill Private . Non -Profit I♦ ' For Non -US Persons: Social Security Number, Passport Number and Country of Issuance or other similar identification number may be substituted. Please Note For Canadian Individuals This Number Is Optional Government Issued ID fl: Type of ID (ex. Passport): Country of Issuance: 0 Other Govemment Entity: WebsiteURL http://www.ircutilities.com/ II Individual 1 Sole Proprietor II Corporation . Partnership 0 Government GOV • LLC IfLLC,TaxedAs: II Disregarded Entity . Corporation III Partnership Primarysourceof revenueforthelegalentity Water and sewersales. If Government Owned or a Non Government Organization what is the primary source of funding? Water and sewer sales. • Does the merchant Identify their legal entity as one of the following: Bank, Non-0peratinglAsset Holding Company, Fund, None of these? None of these State of Formation N/A Date of Formation Trading Symbol Fiscal YearEnd(MMIDD/YYYY) Has Merchant EverFiled ForBankruptcy? No If,Yes,WhatChapter? Filing Date Emergence Date Do The Financials Of The Additional Company Stand Alone Or Consolidated? None of these 11, Consolidated, Indicate Name Of The Company The Financials Are Included In What Is The Relationship Between The Additional Company And The Company Which Entered The Agreement? Other Relationship FSL sub merchant • ` : • " ` Each •wner Signing Authorizes JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A. And Paymentech, LLC As Part Of This Investigation, To Obtain And Review Third Party Credit Bureau Reports On Such Owner. Ownership details must be provided for each individual or Legal Entity Owner with a 10% or greater ownership interest. IName of Individual/Sole Proprietor or Entity/Parent Company CorporateTitie SSNIEIN' OR I I Non -US Person N/A Street Address (Individual/Sole Proprietor use home address) (No PO Box or paid mailbox) Percentage of Ownership: %o City State ZipCodo Date of Birth (if Entity) Is Entity publicly traded? Stock Exchange Ticker Symbol Country of Domicile Telephone if ■ No II Yes ' For Non -US Persons: Social Security Number, Passport Number and Country of Issuance or other similar identification number may be substituted. Please Note For Canadian Individuals This Number Is Optional Government Issued ID fl: Type of ID (ex. Passport): Country of Issuance: ADDITIONAL COMPANY MINI APP US APRIL 2018 1 PAGE 1 OF 3 138 ADDITIONAL COMPANY APPLICATION CHASE 0 J.P. Morgan 1 C ;,1 Name of Individual/Sole Proprietor or Entity/Parent Company CorporateTitle SSNlEIN' OR ri Non -US Person N/A Street Address (Individual/Sole Proprietor use home address) (No PO Box or paid mailbox) Percentage of Ownership: /0 City State Zip Code Date of Birth (if Entity) Is Entity publicly traded? Stock Exchange Ticker Symbol Country of Domicile Telephoned ■ No ■ Yes • For Non -US Persons: Social Security Number, Passport Number and Country Please Note For Canadian Individuals Government Issued ID &: Tweet ID (ex. Passport): of issuance or other similar identification This Number Is Optional Cou:dryof Issuance: number may be substituted. Do you have any additional Owners (not listed above) that have 10% or greater ownership, either directly or indirectly? ❑ Yes Owner/Officer Addendum required (Sates Representative will provide) ❑ No NOTE IF AN ENTITY/PARENT COMPANY IS LISTED IN SECTION 2 ABOVE THAT HAS 10% OR GREATER OWNERSHIP OF THE APPLICANT, IDENTIFY ANY OWNERS (INDIVIDUALS AND/OR ENTITIES) OF THE ENTiTY/PARENT COMPANY THAT ULTIMATELY HAVE 10% OR GREATER OWNERSHIP IN THE APPLICANT ON THE ADDITIONAL OWNER/OFFICER ADDENDUM (SALES REPRESENTATIVE WILL PROVIDE) 0 Controlling Officer— an individual with significant responsibility for managing the legal entity Name N/A Street Address (provide home address. No PO Box or paid mailbox) Country City State Zip Code 1 U Key Decision Maker Le. Senior Mgr.2 U Chairman 3 U Chief Executive Officer 4 U Chief Financial Officer 5 U Chief Operations Officer 6 U President 7 U Other (specity) DOB SSNIEIN• OR Non -US Person(seebelow) Selections (1-7) above require a Date of Birth (DOB) and SSNIEIN• (or if you selected "Non -Profit" in section 1 B) 8 • Board of Directors(select) MI Voting • Non -Voting • For Non -US Persons: Social Security Number, Passport Number and Country of Issuance or other similar Identification number may be substituted. For Canadian individuals, this field Is optional Government Issued ID 4: Type of ID (ex. Passport): CountryofIssuance: Do you have any additional owners not listed above that have 10% or greater ownership, either directly or indirectly? 0 Yes Owner/Officer Addendum required (Sates Representative will provide) 0 No Note: 11 an Entity/Parent Company is listed above In section 5 that has 10% or greater ownership of the applicant, please identify any owners (Individuals and/or Entitles)of that Entity/Parent Company that ultimately have 10% or greater ovmership in the applicant on the Additional Owner/Officer Addendum (Sales Representative will provide) Is there anyone not listed above who has authority to make financial decisions or control company policy on behalf of your business? ❑ Yes Officer/Officer Addendum required (Sales Representative will provide) ❑ No ADDITIONAL COMPANY MINI APP US APRIL 2018 I PAGE 2 OF 3 139 ADDITIONAL COMPANY APPLICATION CHASE 0 J P..Morgan 0 Authorized Representative C '. Name Bob Solari, Chairman of Indian River County Board of County Commissioners Street Address (if individual provide home address. No PO Box or paid mailbox) 1801 27th Street Country Indian River County City Vero Beach State Florida Zip Code 32960 SECTION 3: AUTHORIZED ADMINISTRATOR FOR ACCOUNT BOARDING AUTHORIZED ADMINISTRATOR FOR PURPOSES OF ACCOUNT BOARDING AND IMPLEMENTATION MEANS AN OWNER, PARTNER, OFFICER, EMPLOYEE OR OTHER AGENT OF THE MERCHANT THAT HAS BEEN APPOINTED BY AN EXECUTIVE OF MERCHANT AND WHO IS DULY AUTHORIZED TO PROVIDE INFORMATION AND EXECUTE DOCUMENTATION ON BEHALF OF AND RELATED TO MERCHANT IN ORDER TO FACILITATE THE INITIAL SET UP OF MERCHANTS'S ACCOUNT WITH CHASE PAYMENTECH. PER CHASE PAYMENTECH POLICY, AUTHORIZED ADMINISTRATORS ARE NOT PERMITTED TO MODIFY THE MERCHANT'S ACCOUNT WITH CHASE PAYMENTECH AFTER COMPLETION OF THE INITIAL SET UP OF MERCHANTS'S ACCOUNT. SUCH CHANGES MUST BE MADE, BY AN EXECUTIVE OR FINANCIAL CONTACT, AS APPLICABLE AND AS THOSE ROLES ARE DEFINED BY MERCHANT. (Photocopy of signature below is valid for the release of information requested and will remain valid until the termination or expiration of the Merchant Agreement) Merchant Name (Printed) N/A Merchant Signature Merchant Tide (Printed): Date Telephone Number Email Address SECTION 4: CERTIFICATION I, THE UNDERSIGNED, BEING AN OFFICER/PRINCIPAL OF County of Indian River - Board of County Commissioners REPRESENT AND WARRANT THAT THE STATEMENTS MADE ON THIS DOCUMENT ARE CORRECT AND FACTUAL. JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A ("MEMBER") AND PAYMENTECH, LLC ("PAYMENTECH" OR "CHASE PAYMENTECH") ARE AUTHORIZED TO CONDUCT ANY NECESSARY INVESTIGATION, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, AUTHORIZATION FOR A BANK TO RELEASE STANDARD BANKING INFORMATION. (Photocopy of signature below is valid for the release of information requested and will remain valid until the termination or expiration of the Merchant Agreement) Merchant Name (Printed) County of Indian River - Board of County Commissioners Merchant Signature MerchantTitle(Pdnted): Chairman of Indian River County Board of County Commissioners Date IF THE SIGNER HAS NOT ALREADY PROVIDED IT ABOVE, A RESIDENTIAL ADDRESS IS PREFERRED IF AVAILABLE (NO PO BOX OR PAID MAILBOX). IF NOT AVAILABLE, BUSINESS ADDRESS IS ACCEPTABLE. Street Address City State Zip Note: Each Merchant is required to submit a W9 with this application. ADDITIONAL COMPANY MINI APP US APRIL 2018 1 PAGE 3 OF 3 140 Paymentus 13024 Ballantyne Corporate Place Suite 450 Charlotte, NC 28277 ACH ORIGINATION ADDENDUM This ACH Origination Addendum ("Addendum") is entered into as of by and between county of Indian River - Board of County Commissioners Corporation, a Delaware corporation ("us"). ("you") and Paymentus This Addendum applies if you have a Master Services Agreement or any other agreement with us (including for this purpose, any affiliate) and we currently or in the future process Automated Clearinghouse ("ACH" or "e -check") transactions for you. This Addendum highlights those additional terms that apply to our processing of ACH transactions for you. Unless otherwise defined in this Addendum, capitalized terms in this Addendum have the meanings set forth in the Master Services Agreement or as defined in the NACHA Operating Rules (as defined below). The ACH network is controlled and managed by the National Automated Clearinghouse Association ("NACHA") and its member organizations and is governed by certain operating rules ("Rules"). The Rules require that all Originators (like you), and Third -Party Senders (like us) must be bound to the Rules. You are authorizing us to submit ACH debit and credit entries on your behalf. As an Originator of debit and credit entries, you accept the obligations as defined in the Rules insofar as you perform the functions identified in the Rules. We further accept our obligations as a Third -Party Sender insofar as we perform the functions identified in the Rules for you. Depending on the circumstances, either you or we will obtain your customers' consent to debit or credit their bank account. The consents will be in the form and manner that complies with the Rules. If authorizations were obtained prior to your agreement with us (and/or from another Third -Party Sender or Third -Party Service Provider), you agree to retain proof of this consent and provide it to us upon request within five (5) business days. If a customer has stopped payment or revoked authorization for a transaction, you agree not to reinitiate this payment until a new authorization is obtained from the customer. You acknowledge that ACH entries may not be initiated that violate the laws of the United States. You may not, and may not attempt to (and we will not and will not attempt to on your behalf) send or receive funds to or from a person, entity, or state where such transactions are prohibited by applicable law and will not initiate transactions on behalf of another person or entity for which you are not the ultimate beneficiary. You acknowledge that we have a responsibility to monitor and review your ACH originated activity for compliance with this Addendum, the Rules and applicable laws, regulations and orders as well as for security, legal, fraud and any other legitimate purpose as permitted by law. This includes the right to review your records and you agree to provide access to any information reasonably requested in connection with any review. If you are found to have breached any term of this Addendum or the Rules, we may terminate or suspend this Addendum by giving you written notice, which will be effective immediately. NACHA may amend the Rules at any time, and we may amend this Addendum or make changes to Services as necessary to comply with the Rules. If we make those changes, we will provide you with a copy of the amended Addendum or a description of the Services changes, which in either case will be effective when we make it available to you. Signed By: 141 CHASE 014 Paymentech Government Owned Addendum (Municipal Utilities, Municipalities, Gov't Agencies) Rev. GOV 08/2016 This Addendum supplements the Merchant Application And/or Agreement executed and submitted by County of Indian River— Board of County Commissioners(Merchant Legal Name - "Merchant"). As such, this Addendum shall (i) be deemed incorporated into and a part of Merchant's Application to establish a Merchant account with Paymentech, LLC and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. and (ii) in accordance with such Merchant Application and Agreement, constitute a part of the entire Agreement governing all Merchant accounts. FUNCTION Merchant is a Government Entity. Function of Merchant. Water and sewer sales. Authorized Purpose of Govemment Entity? Provide water and sewer services. Government Website URL • http://www.ircutilities.com/ Authorized Representative 1, the undersigned, certify: • that I am an officer or other authorized representative of the Merchant ("Authorized Representative") and • that I am duly authorized to enter into agreements on behalf of Merchant and to legally bind Merchant to such agreements. • that 1 am duly authorized to submit this Addendum and all information contained herein on behalf of the Merchant. By submitting this Addendum, Merchant, through the undersigned Authorized Representative • represents and warrants that the person submitting this Addendum is duly authorized to enter into agreements on behalf of Merchant and to legally bind Merchant to such agreements. • represents and warrants that all information contained within this Addendum is true, complete and not misleading. X Authorized Representative: Signature Print Name Date Page 1 of 1 142 CHASE Om SUBMITTER MERCHANT PAYMENT PROCESSING INSTRUCTIONS AND GUIDELINES (For use by Paymentus' U.S.-based clients) Paymentech, LLC ("Paymentech" or "we", "us" or "our" and the like), for itself and on behalf of JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. ("Member"), is very excited about the opportunity to join Paymentus Corporation in providing you with state-of-the-art payment processing services. When your Customers pay you through Paymentus Corporation, you may be the recipient of a Card funded payment. The organizations that operate these Card systems (such as Visa U.S.A., Inc. and MasterCard International Incorporated; collectively, the "Payment Brands") require that you (i) enter into a direct contractual relationship with an entity that is a member of the Payment Brand and (ii) agree to comply with Payment Brand Rules as they pertain to applicable Card Transaction you submit through Paymentus Corporation. You are also required to fill out an Application with Paymentech. The Application provides Paymentech with information relative to your processing practices and expectations. By executing this document, you are fulfilling the Payment Brand Rule of entering into a direct contractual relationship with a member, and you are agreeing to comply with Payment Brand Rules as they pertain to Transactions you submit for processing through the Paymentus Corporation service. We understand and acknowledge that you have contracted with Paymentus Corporation to obtain Card processing services on your behalf and that Paymentus Corporation may have agreed to be responsible for your obligations to us for such Transactions and as set forth in these guidelines. The following information is designed to inform and assist you as we begin our relationship. 1. Your Acceptance of Cards • You agree to comply with all Payment Brand Rules, as may be applicable to you and in effect from time. You understand that we may be required to modify these instructions and guidelines in order to comply with requirements imposed by the Payment Brands. • In offering payment options to your customers, you may elect any one of the following options. These acceptance options above apply only to domestic transactions: (1) Accept all types of Visa and MasterCard cards, including consumer credit and debit/check cards, and commercial credit and debit/check cards; (2) Accept only Visa and MasterCard credit cards and commercial cards (If you select this option, you must accept all consumer credit cards (but not consumer debit/check cards) and all commercial card products, including business debit/check cards); or (3) Accept only Visa and MasterCard consumer debit/check cards (If you select this option, you must accept all consumer debit/check card products (but not business debit/check cards) and refuse to accept any kind of credit cards). • If you choose to limit the types of Visa and MasterCard cards you accept, you must display appropriate signage to indicate acceptance of the limited acceptance category you have selected (that is, accept only debit/check card products or only credit and commercial products). • For recurring transactions, you must obtain a written request or similar authentication from your Customer for the goods and/or services to be charged to the Customer's Card, specifying the frequency of the recurring charge and the duration of time during which such charges may be made. 2. Settlement • Upon our receipt of your Transactions, we will process your Transactions to facilitate the funds transfer between the various Payment Brands, you and Paymentus Corporation. Unless otherwise agreed to by the parties, after we receive credit for such Transactions, we will provide provisional credit to one or more of the Bank Account(s) you designate herein under the "Funding Schedule" section. • You must not submit Transactions for payment until the goods are delivered, shipped, or the services are performed. If a Customer disputes being charged for merchandise or services before receiving them, the result may be a Chargeback to you. INTERNAL PAYMENTECH USE PDF Merchant Name: County of Indian River - Board of County Commissioners Page 1 of 4 Paymentech Contract No. 000160 143 3. Charkebacks • You may receive a Chargeback for a number of reasons. The following are some of the most common reasons for Chargebacks, but in no way is this meant to be an exhaustive list of all Chargeback reasons: (1) You do not issue a refund to a Customer upon the return or non-delivery of goods or services; (2) An authorization/approval code was required and not obtained; (3) The Transaction was fraudulent; (4) The Customer disputes the Card sale or the signature on the sale documentation, or claims that the sale is subject to a set-off, defense or counterclaim; or (5) The Customer refuses to make payment for a Card sale because in the Customer's good faith opinion, a claim or complaint has not been resolved, or has been resolved by you but in an unsatisfactory manner. 4. Data Security and Privacy • By signing below, you represent to us that you do not have access to any Card Information (such as the Customer's primary account number, expiration date, security code or personal identification number) and you will not request access to such Card Information from Paymentus Corporation. In the event that you do happen to receive Card Information in connection with the processing services provided by Paymentus Corporation or Paymentech under these guidelines, you agree that you will not use it for any fraudulent purpose or in violation of any Payment Brands or applicable taw and you will comply with all applicable Payment Brand Rules and Security Standards. If at any time you believe that Card Information has been compromised, you must notify us promptly and assist in providing notification to the proper parties. You must ensure your compliance with all Security Standards that are applicable to you and which may be published from time to time by the Payment Brands. If any Payment Brand requires an audit of you due to a data security compromise event or suspected event, you agree to cooperate with such audit. You may not use any Card Information other than for the sole purpose of completing the Transaction authorized by the Customer for which the information was provided to you, or as specifically allowed by Payment Brand Rules, or required by law. In the event of your failure, including bankruptcy, insolvency or other suspension of business operations, you shall not sell, transfer or disclose any materials that contain Transaction information or Card Information to third parties. S. Fundinw Schedule • In order to receive funds from Paymentech, you must maintain one or more bank account(s) at a bank that is a member of the Automated Clearing House ("ACH") system and the Federal Reserve wire system (the "Bank Account"). You must designate at least one Bank Account for the deposit and settlement of funds and the debit of any fees and costs associated with Paymentech's processing of the Transactions (all such designated Bank Accounts shall be collectively referred to herein as the "Settlement Account"). You authorize Paymentech to initiate electronic credit and debit entries and adjustments to your Settlement Account in accordance with this Section 5. We will not be liable for any delays in receipt of funds or errors in Settlement Account entries caused by third parties, including but not limited to delays or errors by the Payment Brands or your bank. • Unless otherwise agreed to by the parties, the proceeds payable to the Settlement Account shall be equal to the amounts received by us in respect of your Card transactions less all Chargebacks, Customer refunds and other applicable charges. Such amounts will be paid into the Settlement Account promptly following our receipt of the funds. If the proceeds payable to the Settlement Account do not represent sufficient credits, or the Settlement Account does not have a sufficient balance to pay amounts due from you under these guidelines, we may pursue one or more of the following options: (i) demand and receive immediate payment for such amounts; (ii) debit a Bank Account for the amount of the negative balance; (iii) withhold settlement payments to the Settlement Account until all amounts are paid, (iv) delay presentation of refunds until a payment is made to us of a sufficient amount to cover the negative balance; and (v) pursue any remedies we may have at law or in equity. • Unless and until we receive written instructions from you to the contrary, all amounts payable by Paymentech to you will be deposited in the Settlement Account designated and authorized by you as set forth below: Name of Bank: TD Bank Account Name: Indian River County BCC/Utilities Account Bank Routing Number: 067014822 Account Number: XXX)0X1 813 Reference: INTERNAL PAYMENTECH USE PDF Merchant Name: County of Indian River— Board of County Commissioners Page 2 of 4 Paymentech Contract No. 000160 144 6. Definitions "Application" is a statement of your financial condition, a description of the characteristics of your business or organization, and related information you have previously or concurrently submitted to us,. including credit and financial information. "Card" is an account, or evidence of an account, authorized and established between a Customer and a Payment Brand, or representatives or members of a Payment Brand that you accept from Customers as payment for a good or service. Payment Instruments include, but are not limited to, credit and debit cards, stored value cards, loyalty cards, electronic gift cards, authorized account or access numbers, paper certificates and credit accounts. "Chargeback" is a reversal of a Transaction you previously presented to Paymentech pursuant to Payment Brand Rules. "Customer" is the person or entity to whom a Card is issued or who is otherwise authorized to use a Payment Instrument. "Member" is JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. or other entity providing sponsorship to Paymentech as required by all applicable Payment Brand. Your acceptance of Payment Brand products is extended by the Member. "Payment Brand" is any payment method provider whose payment method is accepted by Paymentech for processing, including, but not limited to, Visa, U.S.A., Inc., MasterCard International, Inc., Discover Financial Services, LLC and other credit and debit card providers, debit network providers, gift card and other stored value and loyalty program providers. Payment Brand also includes the Payment Card Industry Security Standards Council. "Payment Brand Rules" are the bylaws, rules, and regulations, as they exist from time to time, of the Payment Brands. "Card Information" is information related to a Customer or the Customer's Card, that is obtained by you or Paymentus Corporation from the Customer's Card, or from the Customer in connection with his or her use of a Card (for example a security code, a PIN number, or the customer's zip code when provided as part of an address verification system). Without limiting the foregoing, such information may include a the Card account number and expiration date, the Customer's name or date of birth, PIN data, security code data (such as CVV2 and CVC2) and any data read, scanned, imprinted, or otherwise obtained from the Payment Instrument, whether printed thereon, or magnetically, electronically or otherwise stored thereon. "Paymentech", "we", "our", and "us" is Paymentech, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, having its principal office at 14221 Dallas Parkway, Dallas, Texas 75254. "Security Standards" are all rules, regulations, standards or guidelines adopted or required by the Payment Brands or the Payment Card Industry Security Standards Council relating to privacy, data security and the safeguarding, disclosure and handling of Payment Instrument Information, including but not limited to the Payment Card Industry Data Security Standards ("PCI DSS"), Visa's Cardholder Information Security Program ("CISP"), Discover's Information Security & Compliance Program, American Express's Data Security Operating Policy, MasterCard's Site Data Protection Program ("SDP"), Visa's Payment Application Best Practices ("PABP"), the Payment Card Industry's Payment Application Data Security Standard ("PA DSS"), MasterCard's POS Terminal Security program and the Payment Card Industry PIN Entry Device Standard, in each case as they may be amended from time to time. "Transaction" is a transaction conducted between a Customer and you utilizing a Card in which consideration is exchanged between the Customer and you. [Signature page to follow] INTERNAL PAYMENTECFI USE PDF Merchant Name: County of Indian River - Board of County Commissioners Page 3 of 4 Paymentech Contract No. 000160 145 Please acknowledge your receipt of these instructions and guidelines and your agreement to comply therewith. Agreed and Accepted by: Agreed and Accepted by: County of Indian River- Board of County Commissioners PAYMENTECH, LLC for itself and on behalf of MERCHANT LEGAL NAME (Print or Type) JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. 1801 27th St., Vero Beach, FL 32960 Address (Print or Type) By: By (authorized signature) Print Name: By; Name, Title (Print or Type) Date Agreed and Accepted by: Paymentus Corporation 3455 Peachtree Rd NE 5th FI, Atlanta, GA 30326 Address (Print or Type) By (authorized signature) By, Name, Title (Print or Type) Date Title: Date: Address: 4 Northeastern Boulevard, Salem, NH 03079 INTERNAL PAYMENTECH USE PDF Merchant Name: County of Indian River - Board of County Commissioners Page 4 of 4 Paymentech Contract No. 000160 146 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA AGENDA ITEM Assistant County Administrator / Department of General Services CONSENT AGENDA BCC 03-26-2019 DATE: TO: March 13, 2019 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS THRU: Jason Brown, County Administrator THRU: Michael Zito, Assistant County Administrator FROM: Leigh Anne Uribe, Human Services Director SUBJECT: Children's Services Advisory Committee's Recommendation of Focus Areas of Need, Request for Proposal, and Agency Grant Contract for FY 2019-20 By recommendation of Children Services Advisory Committee, attached are the Focus Areas of Need, the Request for Proposal (RFP) and Agency Grant Contract as pertaining to the funding of children's programs in Indian River County for FY 2019-20. BACKGROUND Each year, in accordance with ordinance 99-01, the Children Services Advisory Committee (CSAC) initiates the grant process by identifying and prioritizing unmet and under -met needs to be addressed in programs and services funded for children in Indian River County for the upcoming fiscal year. The data evaluated is derived from the children's needs assessment performed every 3- 5 years and updated annually, the result of which is set -forth in the Focus Areas of Need. Once determined, the RFP is written and then advertised, outlining the funding priorities and focus areas therein. The RFP also includes instructions, administrative requirements, evaluation criteria, and general guidelines for all agencies applying for funding. It is noteworthy that while a reevaluation of the needs assessment data occurred, no change was warranted in the Focus Areas for FY 2019-20 over the previous year. A comprehensive community- wide needs assessment is currently underway, however. The results of the assessment, which is expected to conclude by the year's end, will be available for the next grant cycle in 2020. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Board accept the Focus Areas of Need and RFP for FY 2019-20, as well as the Agency Grant Contract as submitted, and authorize the County Administrator to execute the individual contracts after review and approval by the County Attorney. ATTACHMENTS Request for Proposal Focus Areas of Need RFP Press Release Agency Grant Contract (Sample — Not to be executed) 147 C:\Users\legistar\AppData\Local\Temp\BCL Technologies\easyPDF 8\@BCL@800EEA91\@BCL@800EEA91.docx 2019-2020 REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL CHILDREN SERVICES ADVISORY COMMITTEE INTRODUCTION The Children's Services Advisory Committee of Indian River County was formed by Indian River County Ordinance 99.01, Chapter 103, as an advisory board to the Indian River County Board of Commissioners. Section 103.20. Purpose. The purpose of the Children's Services Advisory Committee is to promote healthy children in a healthy community. The term "healthy" encompasses socioeconomic, physical, environmental, educational, and behavioral health. Section 103.21. Objective. 1) The objective of the Children's Services Advisory Committee is to provide a unified system of planning and delivery, within which children's needs can be identified, targeted, evaluated, and addressed by the Children's Services Advisory Committee. 2) Definition of a child: any person who has not attained the age of eighteen (18) years; also, a minor. The Children's Services Advisory Committee recommends funding for programs to the Board of County Commissioners. The final decision for funding will be made by the Indian River County Board of County Commissioners. The Children's Services Advisory Committee is seeking programs that provide services to children and families of Indian River County as identified in the 2014/15 Indian River County Community Needs Assessment. Applications are accepted from government agencies, for- profit and not-for-profit organizations, and from individuals. MISSION STATEMENT The mission of the Children's Services Advisory Committee is to facilitate and coordinate the planning and development of an effective and collaborative health and human services delivery system to meet the needs of the children and families of Indian River County. The Children's Services Advisory Committee strongly supports cultural diversity and encourages its funded programs to demonstrate the inclusion of all children and families in program development and implementation. VISION STATEMENT The efforts of the Children's Services; Advisory Committee will ensure the development of a shared vision for the health and human services delivery system in Indian River County enabling funding sources and providers to define and perform their roles in a dynamically changing environment. OVER -ARCHING OUTCOMES • Improve the capacity of children in Indian River County to succeed to adulthood in a safe, healthy and productive manner. • Support caregivers — a child's most important resource — to be and do what is needed to shepherd children into adulthood in a safe, healthy and productive manner. RFP Instructions - 1 148 CHILDREN SERVICES PRIORITY OF FUNDING BACKGROUND The 2014/15 Indian River County (IRC) Community Needs Assessment provided valuable information to help guide the Children Services Advisory Committee (CSAC) in identifying essential children's services. Parts of this data was re-evaluated in 2018. Grant requests will be considered based on the criteria outlined below. LARGER PICTURE The community must start taking a long-term view focusing 15-25 years out. We have a cycle of poverty in IRC that has been increasing and needs to be broken. Interventions should start as early as possible in a child's life in order to have the greatest impact. IRC agencies should use best practices. a. Evidence based with measurable outcomes over time b. Cost effective/efficient c. Skilled executive, program, and board leadership d. Strong fiscal management e. Opportunity for broad impact (replicable, scalable, lever gable) Focus should be on the pockets of poverty. Given that IRC poverty is in geographically disbursed pockets and that we have unique transportation problems, we must always keep in mind that services need to be available where and when people need and can access them. We must utilize the best mediums to clearly communicate what, when and where these services are available. Collaboration in the community is essential and can help optimize human and financial resources, expose and eliminate overlap. The considerations highlighted above have precedence over the actual CSAC Focus Areas listed below. FOCUS AREAS OF NEED (ranked in order by the Advisory Team at the completion of the Needs Assessment process and updated for clarity) Mental health affects every Focus Area. We have decided not to make mental health a separate Focus Area, but to evaluate mental health interventions relevant to each Focus Area. 1. Early Childhood Development This encompasses birth to age 5. For the younger children this would mean improving the interactions they have beginning at birth with their caregivers and with focus on physical, social emotional and cognitive development. It would include improving the quality at childcare, PreK and Voluntary PreK providers as well as improving financial accessibility by leveraging available federal and state funds. Why: Research shows that the period 0-5 is the most important time for brain development. Physical, social emotional and cognitive skills can be significantly impacted during this time. RFP Instructions - 2 149 2. Build Parent Capacity This encompasses improving parenting skills at every age of a child's life and providing support mechanisms for parents, including the pre -natal period. A priority would be new parents in particular first time and single parents and those in the poverty pockets. Why: A parent is a child's first and most important teacher. We need to equip parents to be the good parents that they all want to be. 3. After school and summer recreational activities and academic enrichment programs They need to be free/affordable and accessible (transportation) to parents and children. They should include a literacy/tutoring component. We hold agencies to a high standard of what constitutes academic enrichment. Mentoring programs are included. There is a Targe gap of programs for children 12+. Why: Children need to develop positive out of school outlets that keep them engaged in school, promote their health and provide connections (to sports/hobbies, a person or group, etc.). There is a wealth of data supporting extended day and extended year. 4. Middle and High School programs that address risky behavior Programs that help adolescents and teens develop the tools to become productive, healthy and law-abiding citizens and address risky behavior (alcohol, tobacco, vaping, drugs, delinquency, teen pregnancy, STDs, bullying, etc.) Why: There is a lot of at -risk behavior and we need to ensure that it is addressed early and repeatedly. EVALUATION CRITERIA The proposals will be reviewed and evaluated by the Grant Review Sub -Committee, which consists of members of the Children's Services Advisory Committee and other citizens of Indian River County. STANDARDS FOR EVALUATION 1. The program addresses, directly or indirectly, one or more of the Children's Services Advisory Committee's Focus Areas. 2. The program incorporates a system to bring the target population in need of services to the program. 3. The program has a substantial impact, directly or indirectly, on the achievement of one or more of the Children's Services Advisory Committee's Focus Areas of Need and incorporates measurable outcomes to demonstrate such impact. 4. The focus of the program is early intervention: the prevention of a problem before it occurs rather than the treatment and rehabilitation of an individual after the problem occurs. 5. The amount of funding requested is a wise investment of community funds. The amount spent is reasonable relative to the number of persons served and the results achieved. 6. The agency offering the program has the organizational capacity to deliver the program successfully (management, financial stability, board effectiveness, community support, etc.) 7. This program is part of a coordinated collaborative approach designed to achieve one of the Children's Services Advisory Committee's Focus Areas. RFP Instructions - 3 150 GUIDELINES TIMETABLE 1. Proposals are due by 2:00 PM on MAY 7, 2019, ONLINE VIA e-CIMPACT. Late proposals will not be accepted. 2. The Grant Review Sub -Committee will evaluate agency proposals on June 6-8, 2019. 3. The Grant Review Sub -Committee will present funding recommendations to the Children's Services Advisory Committee for approval on June 10, 2019. 4. Approved funding recommendations will be presented to the Board of County Commissioners at the Budget Hearing in June, followed by formal notifications to all agencies regarding the funding of their proposal(s). 5. Grant contracts will be mailed out in September 2019. Contract dates will run October 1, 2019 through September 30, 2020. DISQUALIFICATION Any one, or a combination of the two items listed below, will disqualify an applicant from further consideration as a qualified applicant. 1. Failure to include proof of ability to obtain all required liability insurance having Indian River County as an additional insured, contained in the contract attached to the proposal. 2. Failure to submit all portions of the proposal by stated deadline. REQUIREMENTS • All agencies, or individuals, receiving a grant will be required to mention the Children's Services Advisory Committee and Indian River County as a funder, or partial funder of the program, in all printed material and press releases. • All agencies, or individuals, receiving a $100,000 grant or more, will be required to provide Indian River County with a financial audit within 180 days after the end of the agency's fiscal year. The following items will NOT be reimbursed by the Indian River County Board of County Commissioners, or by the Children's Services Advisory Committee: • Any expense not outlined in the agency's funding application • Capital expenses of any amount • Cell phone charges • Costs incurred by applicants in responding to the RFP • Expenses other than those related to the curriculum or staffing of the program • Expenses incurred prior to the first date of the grant • Travel expenses not related to the delivery of the program • Travel outside of Indian River County • Paid Time Off - sick or vacation day payments for employees All materials and supporting documentation submitted in response to the RFP become public documents and the property of the Indian River Board of County Commissioners. RFP Instructions - 4 151 SPECIAL CONTRACT TERMS AND CONDITIONS Contract Procedures • For Profit Applicants must provide a copy of most recent Federal Tax Return with application. Period of Performance • Grant contract will run from October 1, 2019 through September 30, 2020. • Program monitoring, written quarterly reports, and mid -year presentations to the Grant Review Sub -Committee will be developed with grant recipients after contract finalization. Invoicing and Payment • All payments are based on reimbursement. • All requests for payment should be submitted to Indian River County Human Services Department, Attention: Leigh Anne Uribe, 1900 27th Street, Vero Beach, Florida 32960. • Request for payment must be submitted in a timely manner (monthly, if possible). • Reimbursements will be limited to 25% of the contracted dollar amount during each calendar quarter unless preapproval is granted (Oct -Dec, Jan -March, Apr -June, July -Sept). • Each reimbursement request must have a Cover Sheet detailing all expenses. For each expense listed, a backup invoice and any other pertinent data must be attached. If the agency requests reimbursement for salaries, other related documentation (i.e., copies of payroll checks, payroll tax checks, invoices, checks for benefits) must be included. • Travel inside the county will be reimbursed according to Florida Statute 112.061. • Payment may be delayed for three reasons; o Improper filing of request o Not filing quarterly reports with the Department of Human Services within 30 days after the end of each quarter o Not filing the agency's audit, as required by IRC, in a timely manner THE CHILDREN'S SERVICES ADVISORY COMMITTEE AND THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS RESERVE THE RIGHT TO REJECT ANY OR ALL PROPOSALS, TO WAIVE ANY NON -SUBSTANTIVE DEFICIENCY OR IRREGULARITY, AND TO AWARD A CONTRACT IN WHAT THE CHILDREN'S SERVICES ADVISORY COMMITTEE AND BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS BELIEVE TO BE IN THE BEST INTEREST OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY CHILDREN. RFP Instructions - 5 152 CHILDREN SERVICES PRIORITY OF FUNDING BACKGROUND The 2014/15 Indian River County (IRC) Community Needs Assessment provided valuable information to help guide the Children Services Advisory Committee (CSAC) in identifying essential children's services. Parts of this data was re-evaluated in 2018. Grant requests will be considered based on the criteria outlined below. LARGER PICTURE The community must start taking a long-term view focusing 15-25 years out. We have a cycle of poverty in IRC that has been increasing and needs to be broken. Interventions should start as early as possible in a child's life in order to have the greatest impact. IRC agencies should use best practices. a. Evidence based with measurable outcomes over time b. Cost effective/efficient c. Skilled executive, program, and board leadership d. Strong fiscal management e. Opportunity for broad impact (replicable, scalable, lever gable) Focus should be on the pockets of poverty. Given that IRC poverty is in geographically disbursed pockets and that we have unique transportation problems, we must always keep in mind that services need to be available where and when people need and can access them. We must utilize the best mediums to clearly communicate what, when and where these services are available. Collaboration in the community is essential and can help optimize human and financial resources, expose and eliminate overlap. The considerations highlighted above have precedence over the actual CSAC Focus Areas listed below. FOCUS AREAS OF NEED (ranked in order by the Advisory Team at the completion of the Needs Assessment process and updated for clarity) Mental health affects every Focus Area. We have decided not to make mental health a separate Focus Area, but to evaluate mental health interventions relevant to each Focus Area. 1. Early Childhood Development This encompasses birth to age 5. For the younger children this would mean improving the interactions they have beginning at birth with their caregivers and with focus on physical, social emotional and cognitive development. It would include improving the quality at childcare, PreK and Voluntary PreK providers as well as improving financial accessibility by leveraging available federal and state funds. Why: Research shows that the period 0-5 is the most important time for brain development. Physical, social emotional and cognitive skills can be significantly impacted during this time. 153 2. Build Parent Capacity This encompasses improving parenting skills at every age of a child's life and providing support mechanisms for parents, including the pre -natal period. A priority would be new parents in particular first time and single parents and those in the poverty pockets. Why: A parent is a child's first and most important teacher. We need to equip parents to be the good parents that they all want to be. 3. After school and summer recreational activities and academic enrichment programs They need to be free/affordable and accessible (transportation) to parents and children. They should include a literacy/tutoring component. We hold agencies to a high standard of what constitutes academic enrichment. Mentoring programs are included. There is a large gap of programs for children 12+. Why: Children need to develop positive out of school outlets that keep them engaged in school, promote their health and provide connections (to sports/hobbies, a person or group, etc.). There is a wealth of data supporting extended day and extended year. 4. Middle and High School programs that address risky behavior Programs that help adolescents and teens develop the tools to become productive, healthy and law-abiding citizens and address risky behavior (alcohol, tobacco, vaping, drugs, delinquency, teen pregnancy, STDs, bullying, etc.) Why: There is a lot of at -risk behavior and we need to ensure that it is addressed early and repeatedly. 154 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: 2019-2020 REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL CHILDREN'S SERVICES ADVISORY COMMITTEE The Children's Services Advisory Committee (CSAC), an advisory committee to the Indian River County Board of County Commissioners, is now accepting applications for the new grant period beginning October 1, 2019 through September 30, 2020. This Request for Proposal (RFP) allows not-for-profit and for-profit organizations, government agencies and individuals, to apply for funding of programs for Indian River County children. Organizations submitting proposals will be required to demonstrate how their proposed program's focus and impact are aligned with at least one of the Focus Areas of Need outlined below. The deadline for submission is Tuesday, May 7, 2019 by 2:00 PM. FOCUS AREAS OF NEED Mental health affects every Focus Area. We have decided not to make mental health a separate Focus Area, but to evaluate mental health interventions relevant to each Focus Area. 1. Early Childhood Development This encompasses birth to age 5. For the younger children this would mean improving the interactions they have beginning at birth with their caregivers and with focus on physical, social emotional and cognitive development. It would include improving the quality at childcare, PreK and Voluntary PreK providers as well as improving financial accessibility by leveraging available federal and state funds. 2. Build Parent Capacity This encompasses improving parenting skills at every age of a child's life and providing support mechanisms for parents, including the pre -natal period. A priority would be new parents in particular first time and single parents and those in the poverty pockets. 3. After school and summer recreational activities and academic enrichment programs They need to be free/affordable and accessible (transportation) to parents and children. They should include a literacy/tutoring component. We hold agencies to a high standard of what constitutes academic enrichment. Mentoring programs are included. There is a large gap of programs for children 12+. 4. Middle and High School programs that address risky behavior Programs that help adolescents and teens develop the tools to become productive, healthy and law-abiding citizens and address risky behavior (alcohol, tobacco, vaping, drugs, delinquency, teen pregnancy, STDs, bullying, etc.) The complete RFP and instructions are attached. Please review before completing the funding application. For questions related to the RFP and grant application process, please contact Leigh Anne Uribe at (772) 226- 1467 or leigh.uribe@flhealth.gov. For technical support, please contact Nate Bruckner at (772) 567-8900 or nate.brucknerPunitedwayirc.org. 155 SAMPLE AGENCY GRANT CONTRACT Indian River County Grant Contract This Grant Contract ("Contract") entered into effective this 1st day of October 2019 by and between Indian River County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, 1800 27th Street, Vero Beach FL, 32960 ("County") and (Recipient), of (Address) for (Name of Program). Background Recitals A. The County has determined that it is in the public interest to promote healthy children in a healthy community. B. The County adopted Ordinance 99-1 on January 19, 1999 ("Ordinance") and established the Children's Services Advisory Committee to promote healthy children in a healthy community and to provide a unified system of planning and delivery within which children's needs can be identified, targeted, evaluated and addressed. C. The Children's Services Advisory Committee has issued a request for proposals from individuals and entities that will assist the Children's Services Advisory Committee in fulfilling its purpose. D. The proposals submitted to the Children's Services Advisory Committee and the recommendation of the Children's Services Advisory Committee have been reviewed by the County. E. The Recipient, by submitting a proposal to the Children's Services Advisory Committee, has applied for a grant of money ("Grant") for the Grant Period (as such term is hereinafter defined) on the terms and conditions set forth herein. F. The County has agreed to provide such Grant funds to the Recipient for the Grant Period (as such term is hereinafter defined) on the terms and conditions set forth herein. NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and promises herein contained, and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and adequacy of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties agree as follows: 1. Background Recitals. The background recitals are true and correct and form a material part of this Contract. 2. Purpose of Grant. The Grant shall be used only for the purposes set forth in the complete proposal submitted by the Recipient attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and incorporated herein by this reference (such purposes hereinafter referenced as "Grant Purposes"). 3. Term. The Recipient acknowledges and agrees that the Grant is limited to the fiscal year 2019/20 ("Grant Period"). The Grant Period commences on October 1, 2019 and ends on September 30, 2020. 156 SAMPLE AGENCY GRANT CONTRACT 4. Grant Funds and Payment. The approved Grant for the Grant Period is ($ ). The County agrees to reimburse the Recipient from such Grant funds for actual documented costs incurred for Grant Purposes provided in accordance with this Contract. Reimbursement requests may be made no more frequently than monthly. Each reimbursement request shall contain the information, at a minimum, that is set forth in Exhibit "B" attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. All reimbursement requests are subject to audit by the County. In addition, the County may require additional documentation of expenditures, as it deems appropriate. 5. Additional Obligations of Recipient. 5.1 Records. The Recipient shall maintain adequate internal controls in order to safeguard the Grant. In addition, the Recipient shall maintain adequate records fully to document the use of the Grant funds for at least three (3) years after the expiration of the Grant Period. The County shall have access to all books, records, and documents as required in this Section for the purpose of inspection or audit during normal business hours at the County's expense, upon five (5) days prior written notice. 5.2 Compliance with Laws. The Recipient shall comply at all times with all applicable federal, state, and local laws, rules, and regulations. 5.3 Quarterly Performance Reports. The Recipient shall submit quarterly, cumulative, Performance Reports to the Human Services Department of the County within fifteen (15) business days following: December 31, March 31, June 30, and September 30. These reports should include but not limited to the number of unduplicated children served during the quarter, and the progress the agency has made toward meeting their goals and objectives as they stated in their RFP response. 5.4 Audit Requirements. If Recipient receives $100,000 or more in the aggregate from all Indian River County government funding sources, the Recipient is required to have an audit completed by an independent certified public accountant at the end of the Recipient's fiscal year. Within 180 days of the end of the Recipient's fiscal year, the Recipient shall submit the audit to the Indian River County Office of Management and Budget. The fiscal year will be as reported on the application for funding, and the Recipient agrees to notify the County prior to any change in the fiscal period of Recipient. The Recipient acknowledges that the County may deny funding to any Recipient if an audit required by this Contract for a prior fiscal year is past due and has not been submitted by May 1. 5.4.1 The Recipient further acknowledges that, promptly upon receipt of a qualified opinion from their independent auditor, such qualified opinion shall immediately be provided to the Indian River County Office of Management and Budget. The qualified opinion shall thereupon be reported to the Board of County Commissioners and funding under this Contract will cease immediately. The foregoing termination right is in addition to any other right of the County to terminate this Contract. 5.4.2 The Indian River County Office of Management and Budget reserves the right at any time to send a letter to the Recipient requesting clarification if there are any questions regarding a part of the financial statements, audit comments, or notes. 5.5 Insurance Requirements. Recipient shall, no later than October 1, 2019, provide to the Indian River County Risk Management Division a certificate or certificates issued by an insurer or insurers authorized to conduct business in Florida that is rated 157 SAMPLE AGENCY GRANT CONTRACT not less than category A-: VII by A.M. Best, subject to approval by Indian River County's risk manager, of the following types and amounts of insurance: (i) Commercial General Liability Insurance in an amount not less than $1,000,000 combined single limit for bodily injury and property damage, including coverage for premises/operations, products/completed operations, contractual liability, and independent contractors; (ii) Business Auto Liability Insurance in an amount not less than $1,000,000 per occurrence combined single limit for bodily injury and property damage, including coverage for owned autos and other vehicles, hired autos and other vehicles, non -owned autos and other vehicles; and (iii)Workers' Compensation and Employer's Liability (current Florida statutory limit) (iv)In the event that children are supervised, Sexual Molestation Liability Insurance in an amount not less than $1,000,000 each occurrence/claim. 5.6 Insurance Administration. The insurance certificates, evidencing all required insurance coverages shall be fully acceptable to County in both form and content, and shall provide and specify that the related insurance coverage shall not be cancelled without at least thirty (30) calendar days prior written notice having been given to the County. In addition, the County may request such other proofs and assurances as it may reasonably require that the insurance is and at all times remains in full force and effect. Recipient agrees that it is the Recipient's sole responsibility to coordinate activities among itself, the County, and the Recipient's insurer(s) so that the insurance certificates are acceptable to and accepted by County within the time limits set forth in this Contract. The County shall be listed as an additional insured on all insurance coverage required by this Contract, except Workers' Compensation insurance. The Recipient shall, upon ten (10) days' prior written request from the County, deliver copies to the County, or make copies available for the County's inspection at Recipient's place of business, of any and all insurance policies that are required in this Contract. If the Recipient fails to deliver or make copies of the policies available to the County; fails to obtain replacement insurance or have previous insurance policies reinstated or renewed upon termination or cancellation of existing required coverages; or fails in any other regard to obtain coverages sufficient to meet the terms and conditions of this Contract, then the County may, at its sole option, terminate this Contract. 5.7 Indemnification. The Recipient shall indemnify and save harmless the County, its agents, officials, and employees from and against any and all claims, liabilities, losses, damage, or causes of action which may arise from any misconduct, negligent act, or omissions of the Recipient, its agents, officers, or employees in connection with the performance of this Contract. 5.8 Public Records. The Recipient agrees to comply with the provisions of Chapter 119, Florida Statutes (Public Records Law). The Recipient shall comply with Florida's Public Records Law. Specifically, the Recipient shall: (1) Keep and maintain public records that ordinarily and necessarily would be required by the County in order to perform the service. (2) Provide the public with access to public records on the same terms and conditions that the County would provide the records and at a cost that does not exceed the cost provided in chapter 119 or as otherwise provided by law. 158 SAMPLE AGENCY GRANT CONTRACT (3) Ensure that public records that are exempt or confidential and exempt from public records disclosure requirements are not disclosed except as authorized by law. (4) Meet all requirements for retaining public records and transfer, at no cost, to the County all public records in possession of the Recipient upon termination of the Agreement and destroy any duplicate public records that are exempt or confidential and exempt from public records disclosure requirements. All records stored electronically must be provided to the County in a format that is compatible with the information technology systems of the County. Failure of the Recipient to comply with these requirements shall be a material breach of this Agreement. IF THE CONTRACTOR HAS QUESTIONS REGARDING THE APPLICATION OF CHAPTER 119, FLORIDA STATUTES, TO THE CONTRACTOR'S DUTY TO PROVIDE PUBLIC RECORDS RELATING TO THIS CONTRACT, CONTACT THE CUSTODIAN OF PUBLIC RECORDS AT: (772)226-1424 PUBLICRECORDSIRCGOV.COM Indian River County of the County Attorney 1801 27th Street Vero Beach, FL 32960 6. Termination. This Contract may be terminated by either party, without cause, upon thirty (30) days prior written notice to the other party. In addition, the County may terminate this Contract for convenience upon ten (10) days prior written notice to the Recipient if the County determines that such termination is in the public interest. 7. Availability of Funds. The obligations of the County under this Contract are subject to the availability of funds lawfully appropriated for its purpose by the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County. 8. Standard Terms. This Contract is subject to the standard terms attached hereto as Exhibit C and incorporated herein in its entirety by this reference. 9. Sovereign Immunity. Nothing herein shall constitute a waiver of the County's sovereign immunity. 10. Notification. Recipient shall notify County of all changes in Recipient's senior management and of any litigation filed against or by Recipient. 159 SAMPLE AGENCY GRANT CONTRACT IN WITNESS WHEREOF, County and Recipient have entered into this Contract on the date first above written. INDIAN RIVER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Approved: Approved as to form and legal sufficiency: Jason Brown, County Administrator Dylan Reingold, County Attorney RECIPIENT: By: Agency Name: 160 SAMPLE AGENCY GRANT CONTRACT DCHIBIT A [Copy of proposal cover page] 161 SAMPLE AGENCY GRANT CONTRACT EXHIBIT B [From policy adopted by Indian River County Board Of County Commissioners on May 16, 2017.] "D. Nonprofit Agency Responsibilities After Award of Funding 1. Indian River County provides funding to all nonprofit agencies on a reimbursement basis only. 2. All reimbursable expenses must be documented by an invoice and/or a copy of the canceled check. Any expense not documented properly to the satisfaction of the Office of Management & Budget and/or the County Administrator may not be reimbursed. 3. If an agency repeatedly fails to provide adequate documentation, this may be reported to the Board of Commissioners. In the event an agency provides inadequate documentation on a consistent basis, funding may be discontinued immediately. Additionally, this may adversely affect future funding requests. 4. Expenditures may only be reimbursed from the fiscal year for which funding was awarded. For example, no expenditures prior to October 1st may be reimbursed with funds from the following year. Additionally, if any funds are unexpended at the end of a fiscal year, these funds are not carried over to the next year unless expressly authorized by the Board of Commissioners. 5. All requests for reimbursement at fiscal year-end (September 30th) must be submitted on a timely basis. Each year, the Office of Management & Budget will send a letter to all nonprofit agencies advising of the deadline for reimbursement requests for the fiscal year. This deadline is typically early to mid-October, since the Finance Department does not process checks for the prior fiscal year beyond that point. 6. Each reimbursement request must include a summary of expenses by type. These summaries should be broken down into salaries, benefits, supplies, contractual services, etc. If Indian River County is reimbursing an agency for only a portion of an expense (e.g. salary of an employee), then the method for this portion should be disclosed on the summary. The Office of Management & Budget has summary forms available. 7. Indian River County will not reimburse certain types of expenditures. These expenditure types are listed below. a. Travel expenses for travel outside the County including but not limited to; mileage reimbursement, hotel rooms, meals, meal allowances, per Diem, and tolls. Mileage reimbursement for local travel (within Indian River County) is allowable. b. Sick or Vacation payments for employees. Since agencies may have various sick and vacation pay policies, these must be provided from other sources. c. Any expenses not associated with the provision of the program for which the County has awarded funding. d. Any expense not outlined in the agency's funding application. 8. The County reserves the right to decline reimbursement for any expense as deemed necessary." 162 SAMPLE AGENCY GRANT CONTRACT EXHIBIT C STANDARD TERMS FOR GRANT CONTRACT 1. Notices: Any notice, request, demand, consent, approval or other communication required or permitted by this Contract shall be given or made in writing, by any of the following methods: facsimile transmission; hand delivery to the other party; delivery by commercial overnight courier service; or mailed by registered or certified mail (postage prepaid), return receipt requested at the addresses of the parties shown below: County: Leigh Anne Uribe, Director Indian River County Human Services 1900 27TH Street Vero Beach, Florida 32960-3365 Recipient: 2. Venue; Choice of Law: The validity, interpretation, construction, and effect of this Contract shall be in accordance with and governed by the laws of the State of Florida, only. The location for settlement of any and all claims, controversies, or disputes, arising out of or relating to any part of this Contract, or any breach hereof, as well as any litigation between the parties, shall be Indian River County, Florida for claims brought in state court, and the Southern District of Florida for those claims justifiable in federal court. 3. Entirety of Agreement: This Contract incorporates and includes all prior and contemporaneous negotiations, correspondence, conversations, agreements, and understandings applicable to the matters contained herein and the parties agree that there are no commitments, agreements, or understandings concerning the subject matter of this Contract that are not contained herein. Accordingly, it is agreed that no deviation from the terms hereof shall be predicated upon any prior representations or agreements, whether oral or written. It is further agreed that no modification, amendment or alteration in the terms and conditions contained herein shall be effective unless contained in a written document signed by both parties. 4. Severability: In the event any provision of this Contract is determined to be unenforceable or invalid, such unenforceability or invalidity shall not affect the remaining provisions of this Contract, and every other term and provision of this Contract shall be deemed valid and enforceable to the extent permitted by law. To that extent, this Contract is deemed severable. 5. Captions and Interpretations: Captions in this Contract are included for convenience only and are not to be considered in any construction or interpretation of this Contract or any of its provisions. Unless the context indicates otherwise, words importing the singular number include the plural number, and vice versa. Words of any gender include the correlative words of the other genders, unless the sense indicates otherwise. 6. Independent Contractor. The Recipient is and shall be an independent contractor for all purposes under this Contract. The Recipient is not an agent or employee of the County, and any and all persons engaged in any of the services or activities funded in whole or in part performed pursuant to this Contract shall at all times and in all places be subject to the Recipient's sole direction, supervision, and control. 7. Assignment. This Contract may not be assigned by the Recipient without the prior written consent -of the County. 163 O. Consent Agenda Indian River County Interoffice Memorandum Office of Management & Budget To: Members of the Board of County Commissioners From: Kristin Daniels Director, Office of Management & Budget Date: March 20, 2019 Subject: Miscellaneous Budget Amendment 008 Description and Conditions 1. The Florida Department of Labor has invoiced the County for Unemployment Compensation in the Recreation Department, North County Pool and Fire Rescue. Exhibit "A" appropriates $127.00 from MSTU/Reserve for Contingency and $537 from Emergency Services/Reserve for Contingency. 2. Personnel changes in the SWDD/Recycling Department require health insurance to be budgeted. Exhibit "A" appropriates $10,500 from SWDD/Cash Forward -Oct 1St 3. Several projects/funds need to be "rolled over" or reallocated into the current budget year. Exhibit "A" appropriates funding from Cash Forward -Oct 1st from Florida Boating Improvements Fund for $51,775, Single Street Lights for $200, Optional Sales Tax for $240,000 and Native Uplands for $50,000. 4. On December 18, 2018, the Board of County Commissioners approved an ordinance establishing an amnesty program for certain utility delinquency charges. On January 8, 2019, the Board of County Commissioners approved an ordinance permitting the release of ERU's. The current bad debt amount associated with these ordinances is $1,829,075 with staff estimating an additional $500,000 prior to the July 8th deadline. Exhibit "A" appropriates funding of $2,329,075 from Utilities/Cash Forward -Oct 1St to the Bad debt/Water/Sewer expense. 5. The Road & Bridge Department is in need of a 55 -ton lowboy trailer. Exhibit "A" appropriates funding of $55,000 from Transportation Fund/Cash Forward -Oct 1St 6. On November 20, 2018, the Board of County Commissioners approved the FWC Grant Agreement to assist in funding 2 artificial reefs. Exhibit "A" appropriates the grant in the amount of $55,250. 7. On November 6, 2018, the Board of County Commissioners approved a grant award from the Indian River Lagoon National Estuary Program for a wetland project the Jones' Pier Conservation Area. Exhibit "A" appropriates the grant in the amount of $61,000. 8. On November 6, 2018, the Board of County Commissioners approved a grant award from the Florida Inland Navigation District (FIND) for the Jones Pier Conservation Area in the amount of $130,000 and a grant award from the FIND/Waterways Assistance Program for the OiseS Bar Marsh Trail in the amount of $120,000. Exhibit "A" appropriates the grants. 44 Members of Board of County Commissioners March 20, 2019 Page 2 of 3 9. On March 5, 2019, the Board of County Commissioners approved the Housing Rehabilitation CDBG grant in the amount of $750,000. Exhibit "A" appropriates the grant and expenditures. 10. On October 16, 2018 the Board of County Commissioners approved the FDOT Service Development Grant in the amount of $300,000 to continue Go -line Saturday hours. On November 20, 2018, the Board of County Commissioners approved the FDOT Block Grant in the amount of $531,885, and the Section 5311 grant in the amount of $69,776. On February 12, 2019 the Board of County Commissioners approved the FDOT Intercounty transit service to St. Lucie County grant in the amount of $360,000, and the FDOT Service Development Grant for ADA door to door service in the amount of $450,000. Exhibit "A" appropriates the total of $1,711,661 in grant funding. 11 On March 5, 2019, the Board of County Commissioners approved the annual HUD Grant Renewals. Exhibit "A" appropriates the grant funding in the amount of $216,078. 12. On March 12, 2019 the Board of County Commissioners approved funding the Property Appraiser's. Office $8,500 for an audit for the time period of October 1, 2018 through January 7, 2019. Exhibit "A" appropriates $8,500 from General Fund/Reserve for Contingency. 13. Several positions have been reclassified in the Parks/Conservation Land Department. Additionally, a temporary position in County Planning has become a permanent part-time position. Exhibit "A" appropriates funding of $47,609 from MSTU/Reserve for Contingency 14. An accounting adjustment to book the pension liability is expensed in the Enterprise Funds annually. Exhibit "A" appropriates funding of this expense from Cash Forward -Oct 1 St for the following funds: SWDD $30,000, Sandridge $26,000, Building Dept.$110,000, Utilities Dept. $400,000, Fleet $20,000, Self -Insurance $7,000, Employee Health $7,000, Information Technology $45,000. 15. Insurance and pharmacy claims are higher than anticipated. Exhibit "A" appropriates funding of $1,400,000 for pharmacy claims which will be offset by pharmacy rebate revenues. An additional 600,000 is needed to fund health insurance claims which is to be funded from Employee Health Fund/Cash Forward -Oct 1st 16. On January 8, 2019, the Board of County Commissioners approved the updated DEO Grant - living shoreline at Round Island Park in the amount of $13,500. Exhibit "A" appropriates the grant. 165 Members of Board of County Commissioners March 20, 2019 Page 3 of 3 17. On February 12, 2019, the Board of County Commissioners approved the purchase of the Dodgertown Golf Course Property in the amount of $2,450,000. Exhibit "A" appropriates funding of $250,000 from Tourist Tax/Cash Forward -Oct 1st and $2,200,000 from Optional Sales Tax/Cash Forward -Oct 1St Staff Recommendation Staff recommends the Board of County Commissioners approve the budget resolution amending the fiscal year 2018-2019 budget. 166 RESOLUTION NO. 2019- A RESOLUTION OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AMENDING THE FISCAL YEAR 2018-2019 BUDGET. WHEREAS, certain appropriation and expenditure amendments to the adopted Fiscal Year 2018-2019 Budget are to be made by resolution pursuant to section 129.06(2), Florida Statutes; and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County desires to amend the fiscal year 2018-2019 budget, as more specifically set forth in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and by this reference made a part hereof, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that the Fiscal Year 2018-2019 Budget be and hereby is amended as set forth in Exhibit "A" upon adoption of this Resolution. This Resolution was moved for adoption by Commissioner , and the motion was seconded by Commissioner and, upon being put to a vote, the vote was as follows: Chairman Bob Solari Vice -Chairman Susan Adams Commissioner Peter D.O'Bryan Commissioner Joseph E. Flescher Commissioner Tim Zorc The Chairman thereupon declared this Resolution duly passed and adopted this day of , 2019. INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA Attest: Jeffrey R. Smith Board of County Commissioners Clerk of Court and Comptroller By By Deputy Clerk Bob Solari, Chairman BY APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGAL SUFFICIENCY COUNTY ATTkNEY Resolution No. 2019 - Budget Office Approval: Kristin Daniels, Budget Director Budget Amendment: 008 Entry Number Fund/ Department/Account Name Account Number Increase Decrease 1. Expense MSTU/North County Pool/Unemployment Compensation 00410472-012150 $62 $0 MSTU/Recreation/Unemployment Compensation 00410872-012150 $65 $0 MSTU/Reserve for Contingency 00419981-099910 $0 $127 Emergency Services/Fire Rescue/Unemployment Compensation 11412022-012150 $537 $0 Emergency Services/Fire Rescue/Reserve for Contingency 11412022-099910 $0 $537 2. Revenue SWDD/Cash Forward -Oct 1st 411039-389040 $10,500 $0 Expense SWDD/Recycling/Insurance-Life & Health 41125534-012130 $10,500 $0 3. Revenue FL Boating Improvements/Cash Forward -Oct 1st 133039-389040 $51,775 $0 Single Street Lights/Cash Forward -Oct 1st 187039-389040 $200 $0 Optional Sales Tax/Cash Forward -Oct 1st 315039-389040 $240,000 $0 Native Uplands/Cash Forward -Oct 1st 127039-389040 $50,000 $0 MSTU/State Grant/DHS Grant -Jones Pier Fruit Stand 004033-334700-18010 $27,500 $0 MSTU/Cash Forward -Oct 1st 004039-399040 $0 $27,500 Expense FL Boating Improvements/Parks/Other Contractual Svcs/Hurricane Matthew 13321072-033490-17001 $51,775 $0 Single Street Lights/Electric Services 18728041-034310 $200 $0 Optional Sales Tax/Parks/Jones Pier Improvements 31521072-066510-18010 $240,000 $0 Native Uplands/Parks/Junes Pier Improvements 12721072-033490-18010 $50,000 $0 4. Revenue Utilities/Cash Forward -Oct 1st 471039-389040 $2,329,075 $0 Expense Utilities/Customer Services/Bad Debt/Water-Sewer 47126536-036510 $2,329,075 $0 168 Resolution No. 2019 - Budget Office Approval: Kristin Daniels, Budget Director Budget Amendment: 008 Entry Number Fund/ Department/Account Name Account Number Increase Decrease 5. Revenue Transportation Fund/Cash Forward -Oct 1st 111039-389040 $55,000 $0 Expense Transportation Fund/Road & Bridge/Other Machinery & Equipment 11121441-066490 $55,000 $0 6. Revenue Beach Restoration/FWC Grant -Artificial Reef 128033-331700-14013 $55,250 $0 Expense Beach Restoration/Orchid Island Artificial Reef 12814472-066510-14013 $55,250 $0 7. Revenue Optional Sales Tax/IRL Grant/Jones Pier 315033-337700-18010 $61,000 $0 Expense Optional Sales Tax/Jones Pier Improvements 31521072-066510-18010 $61,000 $0 8. Revenue MSTU/FIND Grant/Jones Pier 004033-337710-18010 $130,000 $0 Optional Sales Tax/FIND Grant/Oyster Bar 315033-337710-18009 $120,000 $0 Expense MSTU/Parks/Jones Pier Improvements 00421072-066510-18010 $130,000 $0 Optional Sales Tax/Parks/Oyster Bar Boardwalk & Parking 31521072-066390-18009 $120,000 $0 169 Resolution No. 2019 - Budget Office Approval: Kristin Daniels, Budget Director Budget Amendment: 008 Entry Number Fund/ Department/Account Name Account Number Increase Decrease 9 Revenue CDBG/Grant #19DBON104001 H03 129033-331554-19802 $750,000 $0 Expense CDBG Grant/Other Professional Services 12913054-033190-19802 $103,000 $0 CDBG Grant/Other Contractual Services 12913054-033490-19802 $637,500 $0 CDBG Grant/All Travel 12913054-034020-19802 $4,000 $0 CDBG Grant/Postage 12913054-034210-19802 $1,000 $0 CDBG Grant/Legal Ads 12913054-034910-19802 $1,500 $0 CDBG Grant/Office Supplies 12913054-035110-19802 $1,000 $0 CDBG Grant/Inter-Dept. Expenses 1293054-036990-19802 $2,000 $0 10. Revenue General Fund/FDOT Service Development Grant 001033-334420 $750,000 $0 General Fund/FDOT PublicTransit Block Grant 001033-334450 $531,885 $0 General Fund/FDOT Transit Corridor Grant 001033-334407 $360,000 $0 General Fund/Section 5311 Grant -SRA 001033-331423 $69,776 $0 Expense General Fund/Agencies/SRA/Community Transportation Coordinator 00111041-088230-54001 $1,711,661 $0 11. Revenue HUD Grants/Coctra Grant#FLO113L4H091806 136033-331601-19803 $7,938 $0 HUD Grants/Alcohohope Grant#FL0114L4H091811 136033-331601-19804 $37,488 $0 HUD Grants/HMIS Grant#FLO116L4H091811 136033-331601-19805 $2,950 $0 HUD Grants/New Chronics #FLO119L4H091811 136033-331601-19806 $71,424 $0 HUD Grants/COC TRA2 #FL0338L4H091805 136033-331601-19807 $6,248 $0 HUD Grants/Chronics #FL0360L4H091809 136033-331601-19808 $24,552 $0 HUD Grants/Family Rent #FL0380L4H091804 136033-331601-19809 $7,884 $0 HUD Grant/New Horizons #FL0440L4H091807 136033-331601-19811 $57,594 $0 170 Resolution No. 2019 - Budget Office Approval: Kristin Daniels, Budget Director Budget Amendment: 008 Entry Number Fund/ Department/Account Name Account Number Increase Decrease Expense HUD Grants/Coctra Grant#FL0113L4H091806 13616364-036730-19803 $7,938 $0 HUD Grants/Alcohohope Grant#FL0114L4H091811 13616364-036730-19804 $37,488 • $0 HUD Grants/HMIS Grant#FL0116L4H091811 13616364-08871-19805 $2,950 $0 HUD Grants/New Chronics #FL0119L4H091811 13616364-036730-19806 $71,424 $0 HUD Grants/COC TRA2 #FL0338L4H091805 13616364-036730-19807 $6,248 $0 HUD Grants/Chronics #FL0360L4H091809 13616364-036730-19808 $24,552 $0 HUD Grants/Family Rent #FL0380L4H091804 13616364-036730-19809 $7,884 $0 HUD Grant/New Horizons #FL0440L4H091807 13616364-036730-19810 $57,594 $0 12. Expense General Fund/BCC/External Auditors 00110111-033210 $8,500 $0 General Fund/Reserve for Contingency 00119981-099910 $0 $8,500 13. Expense MSTU/County Planning/Salaries-Part Time 00420515-011130 $33,072 $0 MSTU/County Planning/Social Security 00420515-012110 $2,051 $0 MSTU/County Planning/Retirement 00420515-012120 $2,732 $0 MSTU/County Planning/Workers Compensation 00420515-012140 $50 $0 MSTU/County Planning/Medicare 00420515-012170 $480 $0 MSTU/Parks/Conservation Land/Salaries 00421072-011120 $7,956 $0 MSTU/Parks/Conservation Land/Social Security 00421072-012110 $494 $0 MSTU/Parks/Conservation Land/Retirement 00421072-012120 $658 $0 MSTU/Parks/Conservation Land/Medicare 00421072-012170 $116 $0 MSTU/Reserve for Contingency 00419981-099910 $0 $47,609 171 Resolution No. 2019 - Budget Office Approval: Kristin Daniels, Budget Director Budget Amendment: 008 Entry Number Fund/ Department/Account Name Account Number Increase Decrease 14. Revenue SWDD/Cash Forward -Oct 1st 411039-389040 $30,000 $0 Sandridge/Cash Forward -Oct 1st 418039-389040 $26,000 $0 Building Dept/Cash Forward -Oct 1st 441039-389040 $110,000 $0 Utilities Dept/Cash Forward -Oct 1st 471039-389040 $400,000 $0 Fleet/Cash Forward -Oct 1st 501039-389040 $20,000 $0 Self Insurance/Cash Forward -Oct 1st 502039-389040 $7,000 $0 Employee Health/Cash Forward -Oct lsdt 504039-389040 $7,000 $0 Information Technology/Cash Forward -Oct 1st 505039-389040 $45,000 $0 Expense SWDD/Landfill/Pension Expense 41121734-012900 $30,000 $0 Sandridge/Admin/Clubhouse/Pension Expense 41823672-012900 $26,000 $0 Building Department/Pension Expense 44123324-012900 $110,000 $0 Utilities Dept/General & Engineering/Pension Expense 47123536-012900 $400,000 $0 Fleet/Vehicle Maintenance/Pension Expense 50124291-012900 $20,000 $0 Self Insurance/Risk Management/Pension Expense 50224613-012900 $7,000 $0 Employee Health/Health Insurance/Pension Expense 50412719-012900 $7,000 $0 Information Technology/Computer Services/Pension Expense 50524113-012900 $45,000 $0 15. Revenue Employee Health/Misc Revenue/Pharmacy Rebates 5040389-369954 $1,400,000 $0 Employee Health/Cash Forward -Oct 1st 504039-389040 $600,000 $0 Expense Employee Health/Health Insurance/Pharmacy Claims 50412719-034586 $1,400,000 $0 Employee Health/Health Insurance/Insurance Claims 50412719-034580 $600,000 $0 172 Resolution No. 2019- . Budget Office Approval: Kristin Daniels, Budget Director Budget Amendment: 008 Entry Number Fund/ Department/Account Name Account Number Increase Decrease 16. Revenue General Fund/DEO Grant/Reef Site @ Round Island 001033-334353 $13,500 $0 Expense General Fund/Lagoon/Other Professional Services 00128337-033190 $13,500 $0 17. Revenue TouristTax/Cash Forward -Oct 1st 1-19039-389040 $250,000 $0 Optional Sales Tax/Cash Forward -Oct 1st 315039-389040 $2,200,000 $0 Optional Sales Tax/Fund Transfer In 315039-381020 $250,000 $0 Expense Tourist Tax/Fund Transfer Out 11919981-099210 $250,000 $0 Optional Sales Tax/Dodgertown-AII Land 31516275-066110 $2,450,000 $0 173 Consent Office of the INDIAN RIVER COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR Jason E. Brown, County Administrator Michael C. Zito, Assistant County Administrator MEMORANDUM TO: Members of the Board of County Commissioners FROM: Jason E. Brown County Administrator Dylan Reingold County Attorney DATE: March 18, 2019 SUBJECT: Budget Amendment 009 Intergovernmental Coordinator/Public Information Officer Position Background and Analysis On July 1, 2014, the Indian River County Board of County Commissioners ("Board") discussed the issue of creating and funding an "Intergovernmental Relations and Grants Coordinator" position. As part of the discussion the Board requested that the County Attorney's Office create a plan analyzing the alternatives for future lobbying efforts with respect to obtaining funding and positive legislative results at the state level. On July 15, 2014, the Board approved the concept of having an attorney in the County Attorney's Office serve as the point person with one or more lobbying firms, other counties and our legislators and their staff in promoting Indian River County's (the "County") priorities. At the time, the County Attorney's Office was staffed with someone who had the skill set to immediately fill the role, Assistant County Attorney Kate Cotner. Unfortunately, Kate Cotner has been given the opportunity to further her career elsewhere and thus as the County Attorney looks to hire a new Assistant County Attorney, I thought it was important to discuss examining the intergovernmental coordinator role. Since 2014, whether the issue was the sale of the City of Vero Beach electric utility, Brightline or biosolids, the "County has become more involved in legislative matters. And the work is not constrained to the two months of session. There are committee weeks prior to session and meetings that take place with agencies throughout the year. 174 Board of County Commissioners March 18, 2019 Page 2 Back in 2014, one of the options presented to the Board was to fund an intergovernmental coordinator position. This person would not replace the need to hire a lobbyist, but instead would monitor and track all budgetary and legislative issues on behalf of the County and work with a lobbying firm when necessary to protect the County's interests and support the Board's legislative priorities. There are several benefits to creating and funding a full-time person as an intergovernmental coordinator. This person would be able to focus on the County's issues in Tallahassee without balancing other job-related responsibilities. Additionally, this person could serve as a public information officer, coordinating with our local governments and local organizations and the press on important County issues. County staff has identified a growing need for a public information officer to coordinate communications on matters of significance to the County (e.g. Indian River Lagoon efforts, All Aboard Florida/Brightline, Biosolids). Frequently, these issues result in legislative priorities as well. A designated public information officer would also be beneficial during emergencies such as hurricanes, which, while rare in frequency, can have a significant impact on the County and our residents. Such position would report to the County Administrator. This would allow the County Attorney to hire a new Assistant County Attorney who would work full time on legal issues in the County Attorney's Office. The workload for the County Attorney's Office has increased with the faster pace of development activity as well as right-of-way acquisition, and this would additionally prepare the County Attorney's Office for future staff transitions anticipated in the next couple of years. Funding Funding for the proposed position in the amount of $98,679 will be provided by the attached budget amendment from General Fund/Cash Forward Oct PS` Staff Recommendation Staff recommends the Board of County Commissioners approve the proposed budget resolution amending the fiscal year 2018/19 budget to add a position in the County Administrator's Office that will support the County's legislative priorities as well as serving as the public information officer. 175 RESOLUTION NO. 2019- A RESOLUTION OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AMENDING THE FISCAL YEAR 2018-2019 BUDGET. WHEREAS, certain appropriation and expenditure amendments to the adopted Fiscal Year 2018-2019 Budget are to be made by resolution pursuant to section 129.06(2), Florida Statutes; and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County desires to amend the fiscal year 2018-2019 budget, as more specifically set forth in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and by this reference made a part hereof, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that the Fiscal Year 2018-2019 Budget be and hereby is amended as set forth in Exhibit "A" upon adoption of this Resolution. This Resolution was moved for adoption by Commissioner , and the motion was seconded by Commissioner and, upon being put to a vote, the vote was as follows: Chairman Bob Solari Vice -Chairman Susan Adams Commissioner Peter D.O'Bryan Commissioner Joseph E. Flescher Commissioner Tim Zorc The Chairman thereupon declared this Resolution duly passed and adopted this day of , 2019. INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA Attest: Jeffrey R. Smith Board of County Commissioners Clerk of Court and Comptroller By By Deputy Clerk Bob Solari, Chairman BY APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGAL SUFFICIENCY COUNTY AT*IONEY Resolution No. 2019 - Budget Office Approval: Kristin Daniels, Budget Director Budget Amendment: 009 Entry Number Fund/ Department/Account Name Account Number Increase Decrease 1. Revenue General Fund/Cash Forward -Oct 1st 001039-389040 $98,679 $0 Expense General Fund/County Administator/Salaries 00120112-011120 $75,000 $0 General Fund/County Administator/Social Security 00120112-012110 $4,650 $0 General Fund/County Administator/Retirement 00120112-012120 $6,195 $0 General Fund/County Administator/Medicare 00120112-012170 $1,088 $0 General Fund/County Administator Insurance -Life & Health 00120112-012130 $10,679 $0 General Fund/County Administator/Worker's Compensation 00120112-012140 $113 $0 General Fund/County Administator/OPEB 00120112-012160 $954 $0 177 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA AGENDA ITEM Assistant County Administrator / Department of General Services CONSENT BCC Meeting 03-26-2019 Date: March 20, 2019 To: The Honorable Board of County Commissioners Thru: Jason E. Brown, County Administrator Michael C. Zito, Assistant County Administrator From: Sheila S. Votzi, Staff Assistant IV - Department of General Services Subject: Indian River County Community Needs Assessment Funding Commitment for FY2019/2020 BACKGROUND: In order to comply with the Indian River County Ordinance 99-01, a Children's Services Advisory Committee (CSAC) needs assessment is to be conducted every 3 years to ensure that funds are targeted towards the areas of greatest need in the community. On March 12, 2019, the Board of County Commissioners approved the allocation of $50,000 for FY 2019/20 from the children's services budget toward the cost of conducting the needs assessment. In order to obtain more useful data, the 2019 needs assessment will be a collaborative effort between CSAC, Department of Health, United Way, and Indian River Community Foundation. As with CSAC, these organizations all rely upon assessments to identify areas of need within the community to help guide efforts and develop priorities and strategies to address the gaps in services. Indian River Community Foundation has entered into a Consultant Agreement with Q -Q Research Consultants, LLC, who was found to be the best suited to perform the scope of services required. Indian River Community Foundation has submitted a letter requesting Indian River County to join the Health Department of Indian River County, United Way of Indian River County and Indian River Community Foundation in funding of the development of a Community Needs Assessment Report. FUNDING: On March 12, 2019, the Board approved FY 2019/20 total funding for Children's Services of $2,062,611, which includes $50,000 to fund the needs assessment study. RECOMMENDATION: Staff respectfully requests the Board of County Commissioners approve contributing $50,000 to the development of the Community Needs Assessment Report and authorize the County Attorney's Office to draft a contract with Indian River Community Foundation which will be brought back to the Board for approval. ATTACHEMENTS: Indian River Community Foundation's letter dated March 20, 2019 APPROVED AGENDA ITEM FOR MARCH 26, 2019 C:\Users\legistar\AppData\Local\Temp\BCL Technologies\easyPDF 8\@BCL@D80D1FE1\@BCL@D80D1FE1.doc 178 INDIAN RIVER COMMUNITY FOUNDATION BOARD OF DIRECTORS Chairman Neill A. Currie Immediate Past Chair Scott E. Alexander Vice Chairman Rebecca F. Emmons • Treasurer Debra K. Lockwood Secretary Jennifer M. Watson At Large Robert B. Burr, Jr. Philip E. Coviello Marybeth Cunningham Ronald L. Edwards Kathryn B. Healy Patricia A. Hemingway Hall Richard G. McDermott, Jr. Raymond J. Oglethorpe Sandra L. Rolf Brian M. Shambo Sue M. Tompkins President and CEO Jeffrey R. Pickering March 20, 2019 Jason E. Brown County Administrator Indian River County 1801 27th Street Vero Beach, FL 32960 Dear Mr. Brown: Enclosed is a copy of the consultancy agreement with Q -Q Research Consultants, LLC and Indian River Community Foundation for the Indian River County Community Needs Assessment. Based on communication from Miranda Hawker and Julianne Price with the Health Department of Indian River County, I have been notified that Indian River County has agreed to be a funding partner in this agreement with a commitment of $50,000 towards the total contract amount of $110,000. Listed below is a schedule of commitments from current funding partners. Indian River Community Foundation United Way of Indian River County Health Department of Indian River County $30,000 $30,000 $50,000 $110,000 Indian River Community Foundation will invoice the County in the amount of $50,000 due October 1, 2019 and agrees to work with the County in establishing a Memorandum of Understanding. If you have any questions, please contact me at 772.492.1407 or ieff.pickerinq(a ircommunityfoundation.orq. Jeffrey R. Pickering President and CEO Building a Better Community Through Donor -Driven Philanthropy Mailing: P.O. Box 643968 I Vero Beach, FL 32964 179 Physical: 5070 N. Highway A1A, Ste 200 I Vero Beach, FL 32963 772.492.1407 (P) 1772.492.1408 (F) I www.ircommunityfoundation.org Leslie R. Swan Supervisor of Elections Indian River County March 19, 2019 The Honorable Bob Solari Chairman,, Board of County Commissioners Indian River County 1801 27th Street, Building A Vero Beach FL 32960 Dear Chairman Solari: The Supervisor of Elections office conducted a special city council election on February 26, 2019 for the City of Vero Beach. The City of Vero Beach has reimbursed the Supervisor of Elections office for the cost of conducting this election. The revenue received from the City of Vero Beach is $ 24,416.00. I am requesting to have the revenue received from the February 26, 2019 special election to be rolled into the Supervisor of Elections 2018/2019 budget. These election costs were not accounted for in our initial 2018/2019 budget. Should you have any questions regarding the appropriation of these funds please do not hesitate to contact me. I am also seeking approval to relocate two polling sites: Pcts. 2/3 Fellsmere City Council Chambers will be relocated to the Fellsmere Community Bible Church located at 12 N. Hickory Street, Fellsmere. Pcts. 5/12 Liberty Magnet School will be relocated to the School District of IRC located at 6500 57th Street, Vero Beach. The Fellsmere Boys and Girls Club is relocating to the Fellsmere City Council Chambers building, therefore, the facility will no longer be available as a polling site. In addition, I have received several phone calls from parents at Liberty Magnet School expressing their concern about "outsiders" on campus on Election Day. 4375 43rd Avenue • Vero Beach, FL 32967 I Office: (772) 226-3440 ( Fax: (772) 770-5167 I wwwvoteindianriver.coxn March 19, 2019 Page Two (2) Upon the Board's approval, the Supervisor of Elections office would like to move forward with the relocation of both polling places. The Elections Office, per F.S. 101.71(2), will mail a new voter information card to all voters residing within the precincts that are being relocated. I respectfully request the Board of County Commissioners approve the proposed relocation plan and also the reimbursement of funds to the Supervisor of Elections budget for conducting the 2019 City of Vero Beach Special Election. Most sincerely, .1,L4,LA Leslie R. Swan Supervisor of Elections Enclosures 181 IRC Supervisor of Elections 4375 43rd Ave Vero Beach, FL 32967 Bill To CITY OF VERO BEACH TAMMY BURSICK, CITY CLERK P.O. BOX 1389 VERO BEACH, FL 32961-1389 Description # of Voters Invoice Date Invoice # 2/14/2019 5142070 Rate 1 Amount SPECIAL ELECT... 1 Special Municipal Election: February 26, 2019 12,208 2.001 24,416.00 Phone # 772-226-3443 Fax # 772-770-5367 E -Mail tboyle@voteindianriver.com 1 $24,416.00 Web Site wwicvoteindianriver.com 18t Date 1/30/2019 Time 07:56 AM Election 86 Leslie Rossway Swan Supervisor of Elections Book Closing Party Summary by Precinct for SPECIAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION Closing Date = Jan/28/2019 Precinct Total Dems Rens Nag Other LPF 17.0 4,618 938 2,593 1,044 33 10 0 19.0 1,325 338 659 309 14 5 0 19.1 829 247 371 203 7 1 0 23.0 2,751 882 1,104 736 20 9 0 24.0 598 225 170 189 7 7 0 24.1 6 1 2 3 0 0 0 24.2 328 110 119 96 1 2 0 25.0 1,753 406 906 419 20 2 0 Total 12,208 3,147 5,924 2,999 102 36 0 Page 1 Indian River County, FL 183 Leslie RSwan Supervisor of Elections Indian River County March 19, 2019 The Honorable Bob Solari Board of County Commissioners Indian River County 1800 27th Street, Building A Vero Beach, FL 32960 Dear Chairman Solari: The Department of State is authorized to distribute to all 67 county Supervisors of Elections a sum total oftwo million dollars (2,{00\O0U)innon-recurring funds for fiscal year 201O—ZO19from the Federal Grants Trust Fund, pursuant to section 251 of the HeIp America Vote Actof 2002 (HAVA) and the Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance (CFDA) 90.401 ("Help America Vote Act Requirements Payments). These funds are being provided to Indian River County in the ongoing effort to improve the administration of federal &ections. In order to receive the Federal Election Activities Funds, the Legislature requires the Chairman of the Board ofCounty Commissioners to certify that the county will match the state funcls of $17,609.22 with the 15% county match of $I'641.38. have enclosed the Certficate Regarding Matching Funds for your signature. The matching funds have already been budgetedin the Supervisor of Elections FY 2018-2019 approved budget. In addition, the Chairman of the Board of County Commssionersrs is required to certify that the county has purchased and made available sufficient equipment for casting and counting ballotsto meet the needs of Indian River County electors for the flext regularly scheduled general election. 1 have enclosed the Certificate of Equipment for Casting and Counting Ballots for your signature. can certifythat our county has sufficient equipment for casting and countng ballots to meet the needs of Indian River County electors for the next regularly scheduled general election. Please execute both certificates and returri them to the Supervisor of Elections office at your earliest convenience. Thank you for your attention to this matter. Most sincerely, Leslie Rossway Swan Supervis�r of Elections Enclosures ATTACHMENT AtoMOA #2U1D-2U19-0003 3081 SPECIAL CATEGORIES GRANTS AND AIDS - FEDERAL ELECTON ACTIVITIES (HELP AMERJCA VOTE ACT) FROM FEDERAL GRANTS TRUST FUND... S2,000,000 Funds in Specific Appropriation 3081 shall be distributed to county supervisorof elections to be used for election administration activities such as voter education; pollworker training; standardizing elections results reporting; or other federal election administrative activities as approved by the Department of State. County supervisors of elections will receive funds only after providing the Department of State a detailed description of the programs that wifl be implemented. Funds distributed to county supervisors of elections require a certification from the county that matching funds wiU be provided in an amount equal to fifteen percent of the amount to be received from the state. Also, before a county supervisor of elections receives funds for any software or hardware technoogy, including, but not Iimited to, any emerging technoogy that enhances or facilitates the delivery of absentee ballots, the casting and counting of valid votes, voting system audits or recount processes, and the certification of accurate and complete official election results, the software or technology must first be certified or approved, whichever is applicable, by the Department of State. Additionally, before the supervisor can receive funds for emerging or enhancing technology, the county supervisor of elections and the chairperson of the county governing body must certify that the county has purchased and made available sufficient equipment for casting and counting ballots to meet the needs of the county electors including reducing the wait time at the polls during the early voting period and on election day for the next regularly scheduled general election. To be eligible, a county must segregate federal funds and required county matching dollars in a separate account established to hold only such funds. Funds in this account must be used ony for the activities for which the funds were received. Funds shall remain in the account to be used for the same purposes for subsequent years or until such funds are expended. Supervisors of elections shall report to the Department of State any unspent funds remaining on June 30 of each fiscal year. 185 ATTACHMENT B to MOA 2018-2019-0003 FLORIDA OEPARTMEN1' OF STATEDIVSION OF ELECTIONS Count Allocation of Hel America Vote Act Funds - Federal Election Administration Activities - FY 2018-2019 County Voting Age Population (2,010 Census) Amount ' Federal Election Activities Funds Minimum Payment Amnount' Federal Election Activities Funds Voting Age Population Amount ' Federal Election Activities Funds Minimum + Per population Amount p� ' 1S% Match By County Funds Alachua 203'051 $ 5'000.00 $ 22.844.44 $ 27,844.44 $ 4,176.67 Baker 20,068 $ 5,000.00 2'257.77 $ 7,257.77 $ 1,088.67 Bay 131,776 5'800.00 14'825.58 19'825.58 $ 2'973.84 Bradford 22'885 5'000.00 2'574J0 $ 7'574.70 $ 1,136.20 Brevard 435'690 5'000.00 49'017J1 54,017.71 8'102.66 Broward 1'356.717 $ 5'000.00 152'638J2 $ 157'638J2 $ 23,645.81 Calhoun 11'493 $ 5'000.00 $ 1'29I03 $ 6.293.03 $ 943.95 Charlotte 137,100 $ 6'000.00 g 15'424.56 $ 20\424.56 $ 3.06368 Citrus 118,842 5'000.00 13,370.43 $ 18,370.43 $ 2'755.56 Clay 140,695 5,000.00 15'829.02 $ 20,829.02 3'124.35 Collier 258,873 5'000.00 $ I9.124.76 34'124J5 $ 5,118.71 Columbia 52.338 $ 5'000.00 5,888.34 g 10'888.34 $ 1/63325 , DeSoto 27'027 $ 5'000.00 3.040.70 $ 8,840J0 1'206l0 Dixie 13'278 $ 5'000.00 1,493.85 $ 6,493.85 $ 974.08 Duval 660'749 $ 5'000.00 74,338.19 $ 79'338.19 $ 11'900J3 Escambia 233^465 $ 6'000.00 26'26620 31'266.20 $ 4,689.93 Flagler 76.660 5'00100 $ 8'624J1 $ 1I624J1 2'043.71 Franklin 9,579 5'000.00 $ 1'077.69 $ 6'077.69 $ 911.65 ' Gadsden 35'184 $ 5,000.00 3'058.42 8'958.41 $ 1,343.76 Gilchrist 13'308 $ 5'000.00 1'497.23 g 6,497.23 $ 974.58 Glades 10,467 $ 5,000.00 1'177.60 $ 0'177.60 $ 926.64 Gulf 13'289 $ 5.000.00 1'495.09 $ 6,495.09 $ 974.26 Hamilton 11,886 5,000.00 1'337.26 $ 6,337.25 950.59 Hardee 30'056 $ 5'000.00 2,256/42 7'256.42 1,088.46 Hendry 28'254 $ 5'000.00 3'178.74 8'178J4 1,2I6.81 Hernando 138'620 $ 5.000.00 15^595.57 $ 30,595.57 $ 3,089.34 Highlands 80,814 $ 5'000.00 $ 9'092.05 $ 14'092.05 $ 2.113.81 Hillsborough 935'018 $ 5,000.00 $ 105'195.08 $ 110,195.08 $ 16,529.26 Holmes 15'545 $ 5'000.00 1'760.16 6,760.16 $ 1.014.02 Indian River 112'076 5,000.00 $ 13'603.22 g 17,609.22 2,641.38 Jackson 39,839 $ 5'000.00 4.482.12 9'482.12 $ 1,42232 Jefferson 12'013 $ 5'000.00 $ 1,351.63 $ 6,351.53 952J3 Lafayette 7,085 $ 5,000.00 797,10 $ 5'797.10 869.57 Lake 235'311 $ 5,000.00 26,473.88 $ 31'473.88 $ 4,721.08 Lee *97,885 $ 6'000.00 $ 56,015.02 61'015.02 $ 9'152.25 �eon 221,514 $ 5,000.00 24'921.64 29,921.64 $ 4,48825 Levy 32,172 5`000.00 3,619.54 $ 8,619.54 1'29I.93 Liberty Ei588 $ 5'000.00 741,19 5'741.19 861.18 Madison 15'037 $ 5'000.00 I.691J5 6'691J5 1'003,76 Manatee 256i550 $ 5.000.00 $ 28,86I40 33'863.40 $ 5'079.51 Marion 267'117 $ 5'000.00 30\052.25 $ 36'052.25 $ 5'257.84 Martin 120,572 $ 5'000.00 13,565.07 18,566.07 $ 2'784.76 Miami -Dade I.950'707 5,000.00' � 219.46612 $ 224,466.12 33.069.92 Monroe 62'089 $ 5'000.00 6,986.38 $ 11'985.38 1'797.81 Nassau 57,395 $ 5,000.00 $ 6,457.28 1I'457.38 $ 1'718.59 Oko|^mea 140,434 $ 5'000.00 15'799.66 $ 20,799.66 $ 3,119.95 186 ATTACHMENT B to MOA 2018-2019-0003 FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF STATE-DMSION OF EIECTIONS County Allocation of HeIp America Vote ActFunds - Federal Election Administration Activities - FY 2018-2019 County Voting Age Population (2010 Census) Amount - Federal Election Activities Funds Minimum Payment Amount - Federal Election Activities Funds Voting Age Population Amount - Federal Election Activities Funds Minimum + Per population Amount - 15% Match By County Funds Okeechobee 30,412 5'00000 g 3,421.53 $ 8,421.63 $ 1,263.23 Orange 875,809 5�00.00 98,533.71 $ 103,533J1 16,530.06 Osceola 198'269 5.000.00 22'306.44 $ 27'306.44 4,095.97 Palm Beach 1'851'250 g 5'000.00 118'271.87 $ 123'271.87 18,49078 Pasco 366i124 5'000.00 $ 41.191.12 46.191.12 6'928.67 Pinellas 753,654536 $ 5'000.08 $ 84'790.55 $ 89,790.55 13'468.58 Polk 460'359 $ 5'000.00 51,793.12 $ ' 56.793.12 8,518.97 Putnam 57'579 $ 5'000.00 E,477.98 $ 11,477.98 $ 1'721J0 St. Johns 146,188 5,000.00 16,447.02 21,447.02 $ 3.217.05 St. Lucie 215'781 5'000.00 24.276.64 $ 29,276.64 $ 4'391.50 Santa Rosa 115'163 $ 5'000.00 12'955.52 $ 17'956.52 $ 2,693.48 Sarasota 319,713 5'000.00 35'969.61 $ 40'969.61 $ 6'14544 Seminole 325'537 6.000.00 36.624.85 $ 41.624.85 $ 6'243J3 Sumter 84'908 $ 5'000.00 9'552.65 $ 14'552.65 $ 2'182.90 Suwannee 32'10I 6'000.00 3,611.67 $ 8'611.67 $ 1'291J5 Taylor 18'125 $ 5'000.00 2'03917 $ 7,039.17 $ 1'056.88 Union 12'525 $ 5.000.00 1,409.14 6,409.14 96137 Volusia 401'320 5'800.00 45'150.88 50,150.88 s 7.522.63 WakwUa 23'851 6'000.00 2'683.38 $ 7'683.38 1,152.51 Walton 43,713 5'000.00 $ 4,917.97 $ 9,917.97 1'48770 Washington 19'626 $ 5.000.00 2'308.04 $ 7,208.04 $ 1'08121 TOTAL 14,799,219' $335,000.00 1,665,000.00 $ 2,000,000.00 300,000.00 Formula for Allocation: Each county starts with a minimum payment ($5,000). Remaining unds are allocated by voting age population (2010 Census) in each county. FY 2018-2019 Appropriation - Federal Election Administration Activities Total funds tn6eallocated byminimum payment ($6,0nPx67) Total funds to be allocated by votin age population Voting Age Popuation (2010 Census) - Statewide Per voting age population funding multipller $2,000,000.00 $335,000.00 $1,665p00.00 14,799,119.00 0.1125 187 ATTACHMENT E of MOA 2018-2019-0003 Certificate County Match to Federal Grant Trust Funds under the Help America Vote Act Bob Solari , Chairman of the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida, do hereby certify that the Board of County Commissioners shall provide the county Supervisor of Elections a minimum 15% county match* to the total amount that the county Supervisor of Elections may request and receive from the State in FY 2018-19. The Board shall. appropriate an amount equal to or greater than $2,641.38 . I understand that if the Board fails to appropriate the matching funds, all funds received from the State for this grant during the 2018-2019 state fiscal year, including interest, will be required to be returned to the Department of State and shall revert to the Federal Grant Trust Funds. Chairman, Board of County Commissioners Date *See Attachment B to Memorandum of Agreement for Calculation DS -DE 127 Revised 09/2018 188 we, Bob� �� Solari IndianCertificate of Equipment for Casting and Counting Ballots River����Q��m ��......�� Indian River ATTACHMENT 0 of MOA 2018'2819-0003 Supervisor of Elections and Chairperson of Board of County Commissioners, of County, Florida, do hereby certify that prior to the receipt and use of fiscal year 2018-2019 NAVA funds for the purchase of State -approved or certified (whichever is applicable) emerging or enhancing software or hardware technology as allowable per Attachment A, the county has purchased and rnade available sufficient equipmentforcastingandcoundn8baUots to meet the needs of the county electors for the next regularly scheduled genera|e|ection. If the Florida Department of State determines that there is insufficient equipment for cating and counting ballots for the next regularly scheduled Oenpral election as herein certified, we shall return the HAVA funds that were used to purchase other emerging or enhancing software and hardware technoogy to the State, , Supervisor of Eeif ��/4 �/'�K�� �� ^�/ | �/���� / cx Chairman, Board of County Commissioners Date Date DS -DE 135 Revised 6/18 89 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSION REQUEST TO BE SCHEDULED FOR PUBLIC DISCUSSION Any organization or individual wishing to address the Board of County Commission shall complete this form and submit it to the Indian River County Administrator's Office. PUBLIC DISCUSSION INFORMATION Indian River County Code Section 102-04(10)(b): as a general rule, public discussion items should be finite' d to matters on whir' h the commission may take actio' n huliau River County Cade Sectio' n 102.07(2): limit remarks to three minutes unless adtlitional time is granted by the commission NAME OF INDIVIDUAL OR ORGANTLATION: C ( tf (1, gdiersir(i ADDRESS: ../76 e)X /-7) (:)._ PHONE: _ ir 0 et1 • F SUBJECT NIA4'I'Wv. FOR DISCUSSION: 1 X (-Z- 5 / C-3 C 017:3 IS A DIGITAL/ELECTRONIC PRESENTATION PLANNED? IS THIS AN APPEAL OFA DECISION 1 1 YES ca. NO WHAT RESOLUTION ARE YOU , REQUESTING OF THE COMMISSION?it) CZ5S (19/ nove o 7-161A G-.-- (Y) .2_ /0 t_D cf I / cr -7— ARE PUBLIC FUNDS OR ACTIVITIES REQUIRED? YES I NO WHAT FUNDS OR ACTIVITIES ARE REQUIRED TO MEET THIS REQUEST? / /L0C t---37 n 0, r—tr• 2' 12c 02 - Transmitted to Administrator Via: Interactive Web Form E -Mail Hand Delivered Phone COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR: Jason E. Brown MEETING DATE: //71) rC, G 2-0 t9 Decarmenif 190 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA MEMORANDUM TO: Jason E. Brown; County Administrator FROM: Stan Boling, AICP; Community Development Director DATE: March 11, 2019 SUBJECT: Final Recommendations from the Development Review and Permit Process Advisory Committee It is requested that the data herein presented be given formal consideration by the Board of County Commissioners at its regular meeting of March 26, 2019. BACKGROUND On July 11, 2017, the Board of County Commissioners (Board) established the Development Review and Permit Process Advisory Committee (Committee). Subsequently, on August 15, 2017 the Board finalized committee appointments and the Committee conducted its first meeting on October 18, 2017. The Committee convened for 10 monthly meetings, taking a "summer recess" in 2018, and had a long list of accomplishments working with staff and gaining Board approval on a number of development process improvements and streamlining adjustments as well as an updated development review fee schedule. On October 18, 2018, the Committee automatically sunsetted after its initial 12 months of service. Prior to that sunsettingat its October 17 meeting, the Committee voted, to request one or two g, q additional meetings in order to formulate final recommendations to the Board on six topics identified by the Committee as unfinished business. At its November 6, 2018 meeting the Board considered the Committee's request and authorized the Committee to hold up to two additional meetings for its final recommendations on the six topics, with a final sunset date of February 28, 2019 (see Attachment 1). The Committee conducted what turned out to be its final meeting on January 16, 2019. At that meeting, the Committee considered its six topics and formulated all final recommendations. At the end of that meeting, the Committee voted unanimously to end all Committee business and sunset the Committee effective immediately with no further meeting to be held (see Attachment 2). Since the January 16, 2019 Committee meeting, staff coordinated with a Committee member regarding potential landscaping regulation changes discussed at the January 16th meeting. Now, staff hereby presents the Committee's final recommendations for the Board's consideration. C:\Users\legistar\AppData\Local\Temp\BCL Technologies\easyPDF 8\@BCL@AOODEBA3\@BCL@AOODEBA3.docx 191 t21,A.1 ANALYSIS Below is a listing of each of the six final topics identified and discussed by the Committee, pertinent information related to each topic, and the Committee's final recommendation. 1. Building permit items to be researched, specified, and brought forward by Committee member Robert Banov. It was suggested at the October 17, 2018 Committee meeting that Mr. Banov first contact staff regarding the specific items he is interested in prior to Committee discussion. Prior to the January 16, 2019 Committee meeting, Mr. Banov met with staff about his concerns, including concerns about inspection sequencing. All concerns were addressed during that meeting. At the January 16, meeting, Mr. Banov confirmed that all matters had been resolved. Recommendation: None 2. Discussion of a policy to require a cost benefit analysis with future proposed changes affecting the development industry. This policy was initially discussed in concept at the October 17, 2018 meeting. During the January 16, 2019 meeting, staff noted that one approach it has used in the past to evaluate potential costs of proposed changes is to provide a "typical project" cost impact. Staff also noted that the benefits and justification for a proposed change are usually provided in either quantitative data, qualitative terms, or in terms of maintenance and/or life cycle cost savings. Recommendation: That the Board make it a general policy that for proposed changes affecting the development industry, a cost benefit analysis using quantitative, qualitative, or life cycle approaches be presented to decision makers including the Board of County Commissioners. NOTE: Staff supports this recommendation. 3. Discussion of planned development (PD) project "public benefits" policy. This existing policy applies to PD applications only and is used to justify special exception or PD zoning approval of reduced lot sizes, reduced setbacks, and increased densities compared to standard conventional development. This policy relates to PD applicant's providing trade- offs and/or innovative designs comparing a proposed PD to a conventional development. Examples of "public benefit" trade-offs include: providing turn lanes when not otherwise strictly required, right-of-way donations, increased open spaces and tree protection, providing run-off treatment for adjacent public road improvements, and providing for public infrastructure and/or public space (e.g. park site or school site donation). After discussion at the January 16 meeting, the Committee asked that a list of trade-off examples be made available. Staff has created that list which is attached (see Attachment 3). C:\Users\legistar\AppData\Local\Temp\BCL Technologies\easyPDF 8\@BCL@AOODEBA3\@BCL@AOODEBA3.docx 192 Recommendation: None 4. Discussion of landscaping items (one landscape item was scheduled for action at the October 17, 2018 meeting but was not considered due to time constraints). Based on a previous request from Committee member Chuck Mechling, staff proposed an LDR change to codify more flexibility with palm tree credits for canopy trees. That proposal would codify staff's existing practice, and was included in the Committee's October 17, 2018 meeting packet. The Committee ran out of time and did not get to that item at its October 17, 2018 meeting. At the January 16, 2019 meeting staff stated that it continued to support the proposal (see Attachment 4). Committee member Chuck Mechling indicated that he would meet with staff on other landscape regulation ideas prior to the Committee's final recommendations going to the Board. Staff has now met with Mr. Mechling and, in addition to the palm tree credit code changes, is supportive of conducting a future field meeting with Mr. Mechling, nursery and horticulture experts, and other interested parties to consider converting some current landscape ordinance size standards to standards more readily used in the nursery and horticulture industry. Recommendation: Adopt the proposed amendment codifying flexibility 011 palm tree canopy credits. NOTE: Staff supports this recommendation. 5. Consideration of having an on-going development industry committee such as the DRPPAC or the former PSAC. Staff continues to use the Committee email group to notify interested parties on matters that impact the development industry. At the January 16, 2019 meeting, the Committee decided to not pursue this issue. Recommendation: None 6. Re -consideration of a previous Committee recommendation on littoral zone requirements. Littoral zone requirements were discussed and acted on by the Committee in September 2018 when vice-chairman Joe Paladin was absent. Up to that point, the Committee had twice discussed littoral zone requirements and had come to focus on slope requirements which could be adjusted in the land development regulations without requiring a comprehensive plan amendment. At its September 2018 meeting, however, the Committee voted to recommend eliminating County littoral zone requirements entirely by changing the comprehensive plan and land development regulations and "defaulting" to St. Johns River Water Management District requirements regarding littoral zones. Said District requirements provide for use of littoral zones as an option but not as a design requirement. The vice- chairman was interested in this item and has asked that the Committee reconsider its recommendation on County littoral zone requirements. At its January 16 meeting, the Committee considered multiple motions to change its September recommendation on littoral zone requirements (see Attachment 2). In the end, the Committee failed to pass a motion and C:\Users\legistar\AppData\Local\Temp\BCL Technologies\easyPDF 8\@BCL@AOODEBA3\@BCL@AOODEBA3.docx 193 so its September 2018 recommendation remains unchanged. To provide the Board background on littoral zones and littoral zone requirements, staff has attached its reports for the March 2018 and September 2018 Committee meetings (see Attachments 5 and 6). Recommendation: That the Board amend the comprehensive plan and land development regulations to eliminate County littoral zone requirements and follow the requirements and design criteria of the St. Johns River Water Management District. NOTE: Staff does not support the Committee's recommendation. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Board consider the Committee's fmal recommendations and provide staff direction on any of those recommendations the Board wishes to pursue. ATTACHMENTS 1. Minutes from November 6, 2018 BCC meeting 2. Minutes from January 16, 2019 DRPPAC meeting 3. Examples of PD Project Public Benefit Trade-offs 4. Proposed LDR amendment 5. Staff Report on Littoral Zones for March 2018 Committee Meeting 6. Staff Report on Littoral Zones for September 2018 Committee Meeting C:\Users\legistar\AppData\Local\Temp\BCL Technologies\easyPDF 8\@BCL@AOODEBA3\@BCL@AOODEBA3.docx 194 Board of County Commissioners Meeting Minutes - Final November 6, 2018 area of operation permission to the Escambia County Housing Finance Authority to undertake the financing through multi -family housing revenue bonds for improve in connection with the Orange Blossom Village Project. Attachments: Staff Report Application for Tax Exempt Financing Proposed Resolution County Administrator Jason Brown presented the re ' est of the Escambia County Housing Finance Authority to issue Multifamil ' ousing Revenue Bonds to make improvements to the 80 -unit Orange Blos . si Village located at 3300 12th Court in Vero Beach. He noted that no fundi i : is required from the Board. Helen Feinberg, represen ' ' : e Escambia County Housing Finance Authority, was present in support of t Authority's request. A motion was m . • e by Commissioner Adams, seconded by Commissioner Zorc, to approve - olution 2018-108, approving Indian River County as an area of operatio • or the Escambia County Housing Finance Authority with respect to the fins ing or refinancing by the Authority of the acquisition, upgrading, conditioning, rehabilitating, improving and beautifying of a multi -family housing facility located in Indian River County; providing for repeal of conflicting provisions; and providing an effective date. The motion carried by the following vote: Aye: 4 - Chairman O'Bryan, Vice Chairman Solari, Commissioner Adams, and Commissioner Zorc Absent: 1 - Commissioner Flescher 12. DEPARTMENTAL MATTERS A. Community Development is * 12.A.1. 18-2454 Consideration of Request for Two Additional Meetings of the Development Review and Permit Process Advisory Committee Recommended Action: Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners consider the Committee's request and authorize the Committee to hold up to two additional meetings to consider the additional topics listed in the staff report and forward final recommendations for future consideration by the Board. Attachments: Staff Report Resolution establishing the Committee Table of DRPPAC Accomplishments Draft minutes of October 18, 2018 DRPPAC Community Development Director Stan Boling presented the request of the Indian River County Florida 19&e 10 Board of County Commissioners Meeting Minutes - Final November 6, 2018 Development Review and Permit Process Advisory Committee (Committee), to hold two additional meetings, which would bring the total number of meetings to 12. He used a PowerPoint presentation to outline the additional topics the Committee would like to discuss, and suggested that the extra meetings be held in January and February of 2019. Commissioners O'Bryan and Solari discussed their opposition to one of the Committee's pending discussion items, which pertained to the creation of an ongoing Development Industry Committee. Commissioner Zorc commented on the pre -application process followed in St. Lucie County as a good model. Chairman O'Bryan requested that the Committee members be advised that they will remain under the Sunshine Law for the additional meetings. The following speakers addressed the Board in support of the additional Committee meetings: Deb Robinson, Chairman of the Committee, Vice President of Laurel Homes, stressed the need for a pathway between building industry professionals and the County. Joseph Paladin, President of Black Swan Consulting and Atlantic Coast Development, and Vice Chairman of the Committee, provided input on pre -application meetings. Commissioner Adams spoke to the County's responsibility to facilitate communication between the County and other entities, such as building industry professionals, and to keep them informed of upcoming County business. County Administrator Jason Brown recognized the contributions of the Committee members and supported the additional meetings. A motion was made by Vice Chairman Solari, seconded by Commissioner Zorc, to authorize the Development Review and Permit Process Advisory Committee (Committee) to hold up to two additional meetings to consider the additional topics listed in the staff report and forward final recommendations for future consideration by the Board, with a final sunset date of February 28, 2019 for the Committee. The motion carried by the following vote: Aye: 4 - Chairman O'Bryan, Vice Chairman Solari, Commissioner Adams, and Commissioner Zorc Absent: 1 - Commissioner Flescher B. Emergency Services Indian River County Florida 116ie 11 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW AND PERMIT PROCESS ADVISORY COMMITTEE (DRPPAC) The Indian River County (IRC) Development Review and Permit Process Advisory Committee (DRPPAC) met at 9:00 a.m. on Wednesday, January 16, 2019, in the County Administration Building, Building B, 1800 27th Street, Vero Beach, Florida. You may hear an audio of the meeting; review the agenda and the Minutes on the IRC website — http://www.ircgov.com/Boards/DRPPAC/2019.htm. Present were: Chairperson Debb Robinson, District 1; Vice -Chairman Joe Paladin, District 2; Christopher Murphy, Member -at -Large; John Wesley Mills, District 3; Robert Banov, District 4; Bruce Redus, District 4; Chuck Mechling, District 5; Greg Burke, Member -at -Large; and John Blum, District 5. Absent were: Robin Raiff, District 1; Carter Taylor, District 2; Raymond Sheltra, Member -at -Large; and Stephen Melchiori, Alternate; and (all unexcused). Others Present were: Jason Brown, County Administrator; Bill DeBraal, Deputy County Attorney; Stan Boling, Director, Community Development; Rich Szpyrka, Director, Public Works; Vincent Burke, Director, Utilities; Scott McAdams, Building Official; John McCoy, Chief, and Bill Schutt, Senior Planner, Community Development; Dave Johnson, Fire Marshall; Ryan Sweeney, Senior Planner; Misty L. Purse!, Commissioner Assistant and Recording Secretary. Call to Order and Welcome Chairman Robinson called the meeting to order at 9:06 a.m., at which time it was determined there was a quorum present. Chairperson and Vice Chairperson Elections — Action Required ON MOTION BY Mr. Paladin, SECONDED BY Mr. Burke, the Committee voted unanimously (9-0) to re-elect Debb Robinson as Chairman of the Development Review and Permit Process Advisory Committee for 2019. ON MOTION BY Mr. Mechling, SECONDED BY Chairman Robinson, voted unanimously (9-0) to re-elect Joseph Paladin as Vice Chairman of the Development Review and Permit Process Advisory Committee for 2019. Additions and Deletions to the Agenda There were none. 1 BCCC:\Users\kcharest\AppData\Local\Microsoft\Windows\Temporary Internet Files\Content.Outlook\14HORIBI\January 16 Minutes.doc 197 Approval of the Minutes of October 17, 2018— Action Required ON MOTION BY Mr. Mechling, SECONDED by Vice Chairman Paladin, the Committee voted unanimously (9- 0) to approve the minutes of October 17, 2018, as presented. Old Business a) Building Permit Item(s) from Robert Banov Discussion ensued; no action taken. b) Policy on cost benefit analysis for proposed changes affecting the development industry ON MOTION BY Vice Chairman Paladin, SECONDED by Mr. Burke, the Committee voted unanimously (9-0) to recommend implementation of a cost benefit analysis policy for proposed changes affecting the development industry with analysis (quantitative, qualitative, or life cycle approaches) presented to decision -makers such as Board of County Commissioners. c) Planned Development (PD) "public benefits" policy Discussion ensued; no action taken. Through a common request of the Committee, Mr. Boling would provide a list of "for example" or "including, but not limited to" public benefit PD trade-off items as an attachment to assist the public in understanding what was involved with a PD, at such time the committee's recommendations are brought to the Board of County Commissioners. d) Landscaping Item(s) / proposed flexibility on palm canopy tree credits ON MOTION BY Mr. Mechling, SECONDED by Mr. Blum, the Committee supported a proposed amendment already drafted by staff to allow a number of species alternatives and more flexibility on palm canopy tree credits. UNDER DISCUSSION, Mr. Burke supported flexibility in allowing different species to be used. Mr. Mechling also suggested taking into consideration nursery availability for product. THE CHAIRMAN CALLED FOR THE QUESTION, and the Motion passed unanimously (9-0). 2 BCCC:\Users\kcharest\AppData\Local\Microsoft\Windows\Temporary Internet Files\Content.Outlook\14HORIBI\January 16 Minutes.doc 198 e) Having an on-goinq development industry committee No action taken. f) Reconsideration of Committee recommendation on County littoral zone requirements ON MOTION BY Vice Chairman Paladin, SECONDED by Mr. Mechling to keep the littoral zone and change the slope to an 8 -to -1 slope, and change the Land Development Regulations. UNDER DISCUSSION, Mr. Mechling rescinded his second; the MOTION DIED. A MOTION WAS MADE BY Vice Chairman Paladin, to change the slope to a 6 -to -1, instead of the 10 -to -1 slope, with the required littoral planning by meeting Saint John's River Water Management District's requirements, with the minimum of 15 percent. MOTION DIED FOR THE LACK OF A SECOND. ON MOTION BY Mr. Murphy, SECONDED by Vice Chairman Paladin to support staff's recommendation and the Committee recommends to the Board of County Commissioners to direct staff to conduct an evaluation of littoral zones with a recommendation to be modified to a minimum of 6 -to -1 slope; and a reduction of littoral zone plantings be reduced from 30 percent to 15 percent and complies with Saint John's River Water Management District's littoral requirements, consistent with meeting the Indian River County Code. UNDER DISCUSSION, Mr. Murphy rephrased his Motion. ON MOTION BY Mr. Murphy to support staffs recommendation for the Committee to recommend to the Board of County Commissioners to (1) direct staff to modify the slope to 6 -to -1 from 10 -to -1 to provide conformance to the minimum in the Comprehensive Plan; (2) the littoral plantings percentage requirement be reduced from 30 percent to 15 percent; and (3) be meeting Saint John's River Water Management District's littoral standard, it meets the County's requirement. MOTION DIED FOR THE LACK OF A SECOND. 3 BCCC:\Users\kcharest\AppData\Local\Microsoft\Windows\Temporary Internet Files\Content.Outlook\14HORIBI\January 16 Minutes.doc 199 New Business a) Explanation of Approved Utility Rate — Vincent Burke Mr. Vincent Burke, Director, Utilities briefed the Committee on the findings of a utility rate consultant; wherein the Board of County Commissioners approved the changes, with a public hearing approving the solution. He continued the new utility rates would go into effect March 1, 2019, taking note of the tier changes. No action taken. Other Matters ON MOTION BY Vice Chairman Paladin, SECONDED by Mr. Redus, the Committee voted unanimously (9-0) to end all committee business and sunset this committee, effective immediately. No further committee meeting will be held. Mr. DeBraal indicated since the committee had concluded its business and sunsetted, members were no longer bound by committee sunshine law restrictions. Adjournment There being no further business, Chairperson Robinson adjourned the meeting at 11:50 a.m. 4 BCCC:\Users\kcharest\AppData\Local\Microsoft\Windows\Temporary Internet Files\Content.Outlook\14HORIBI\January 16 Minutes.doc 200 EXAMPLES OF PD PROJECT PUBLIC BENEFIT TRADE-OFFS Items provided by a PD project over and above what would be provided by a conventional development • Uncompensated dedications/donations, and construction of improvements 1. Off-site traffic improvements (e.g. turn lanes, increased turning radii) 2. Off-site pedestrian improvements (e.g. sidewalk connections, filling-in sidewalk gaps, sidewalk/path widening) 3. Public parks, open spaces, school sites (may include land and infrastructure improvements and/or fill that serve dedicated public lands) 4. Rights-of-way for existing and future public roads 5. Public access through a project to increase connectivity (e.g. vehicular and/or pedestrian) • Project design enhancements and innovations 6. Increased open space (e.g. large common green space tracts) 7. Large buffers (e.g. increased width, plantings, features) 8. Wetland and/or native upland vegetation preserves (e.g. large tracts, special tree protections) 9. Drainage areas sized and designed to accommodate run-off from adjacent public roads and/or other public facilities 10. Increase setbacks or other special development restrictions (e.g. strategic building height and building mass limitations to address building scale, architectural upgrades, publically accessible common amenities) • Provision of affordable housing (density bonus may apply) Note: this is not an exclusive list AttachmeMIS ORDINANCE 2019 - AN ORDINANCE OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, CONCERNING AN AMENDMENT TO ITS LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS (LDRS); PROVIDING FOR AN AMENDMENT TO CHAPTER 926, LANDSCAPE AND BUFFER REGULATIONS; BY AMENDING SECTION 926.06, LANDSCAPE MATERIALS STANDARDS; AND BY PROVIDING FOR REPEAL OF CONFLICTING PROVISIONS; CODIFICATION; SEVERABILITY; AND EFFECTIVE DATE. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA THAT THE INDIAN RIVER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS (LDRS) CHAPTER 926, LANDSCAPE AND BUFFER REGULATIONS, BE AMENDED AS FOLLOWS: SECTION #1: Amend LDR Section 926.06(3), Trees; as follows: (a) Canopy trees: 1. Canopy trees, except for narrow canopy tree species identified under [subsection] 926.06(3)(d)1.b., below, shall be species having an average mature crown spread of greater than fifteen (15) feet (under local climatic conditions) and having a trunk(s) with over five (5) feet of clear wood. "Clear wood" refers to that portion of the trunk between the ground and the lowest lateral limbs. 2. All new canopy trees shall be planted in a planting area of at least one hundred forty-four (144) square feet, with minimum dimensions being at least twelve (12) feet in any direction. Larger areas may be required by the community development director or his designee for newly planted or existing trees to be preserved, as required by Chapter 927, tree protection. 3. Clusters of palms, such as sabal palms, may be used as canopy trees provided that a minimum of three (3) palms are clustered to equal one (1) canopy tree. Clusters of palms and specimen palms (specified below), if used, shall consist of no more than one-third (1/3) of the total canopy tree requirement. a. A multi -trunk palm may be substituted for one (1) canopy tree provided that the total height of the combined clear trunks (ground to lowest frond, measured along the truck) is a minimum of eighteen (18) feet. b. A Canary Island date palm, Sylvester palm, of Bismark palm, or palm with a similar quality large "frond canopy" with a clear trunk of at least two (2) feet and an overall height of at least twelve (12) feet may count as one (1) canopy tree. Such a palm may count as two (2) canopy trees if it has a clear trunk of at least eight (8) feet and an overall height of at least eighteen (18) feet. c. A palm of the Roystonea genus with a minimum clear trunk of ten (10) feet may be counted as one (1) canopy tree. Bold Underline: Additions to Ordinance Strike through: Deleted Text from Existing Ordinance 2021 ORDINANCE 2019- 4. Minimum canopy tree spacing shall be provided as follows: a. Between full canopy trees (e.g. oak, pine, bay): twenty-five (25) feet. b. Between narrow canopy tree varieties (e.g., cypress and holly) not including magnolia: Fifteen (15) feet. c. Between full canopy trees and narrow canopy tree varieties (e.g., cypress and holly) not including magnolia: Twenty (20) feet. SECTION #2: SEVERABILITY If any clause, section or provision of this Ordinance shall be declared by a court of competent jurisdiction to be unconstitutional or invalid for any cause or reason, the same shall be eliminated from this Ordinance and the remaining portion of this Ordinance shall be in full force and effect and be as valid as if such invalid portion thereof had not been incorporated therein. SECTION #4: REPEAL OF CONFLICTING ORDINANCES The provisions of any other Indian River County ordinance that are inconsistent or in conflict with the provisions of this Ordinance are repealed to the extent of such inconsistency or conflict. SECTION #5: INCLUSION IN THE CODE OF LAWS AND ORDINANCES The provisions of this Ordinance shall become and be made a part of the Code of Laws and Ordinances of Indian River County, Florida. The sections of the Ordinance may be renumbered or relettered to accomplish such, and the word "ordinance" may be changed to "section", "article", or any other appropriate word. SECTION #6: EFFECTIVE DATE This Ordinance shall take effect upon filing with the Department of State. This ordinance was advertised in the Press -Journal on the day of , 2019, for a public hearing to be held on the day of , 2019, at which time it was moved for adoption by Commissioner , seconded by Commissioner , and adopted by the following vote: Chairman Bob Solari Vice Chairman Susan Adams Commissioner Joseph E. Flescher Commissioner Tim Zorc Commissioner Peter D. O'Bryan Bold Underline: Additions to Ordinance Strike through: Deleted Text from Existing Ordinance 2032 ORDINANCE 2019 - BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY The Chairman there upon declared the ordinance duly passed and adopted this day of , 2019. BY: Bob Solari, Chairman ATTEST: Jeffrey R. Smith, Clerk of Court and Comptroller BY: Deputy Clerk This ordinance was filed with the Department of State on the following date: APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGAL SUFFICIENCY Dylan Reingold, County Attorney APPROVED AS TO PLANNING MATTERS Stan Boling, AICP; Community Development Director Bold Underline: Additions to Ordinance ugh:: Deleted Text from Existing Ordinance 2043 ITEM 4b INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA MEMORANDUM TO: Members of the Development Review and Permit Process Advisory Committee THROUGH: Stan Boling, AICP Community Development Director FROM: Roland M. DeBlois, AICP Chief, Environmental Planning & Code Enforcement DATE: March 14, 2018 SUBJECT: County Stormwater Pond/Lake Design and Littoral Zone Requirements It is requested that the Development Review and Permit Process Advisory Committee consider the following information at the Committee's meeting of March 21, 2018. BACKGROUND & ANALYSIS In conjunction with its mining and excavation regulations, Indian River County has required, since 1988, littoral zone plantings in association with stormwater pond/lake creation. A littoral zone is that portion of a pond or lake that is designed to contain rooted aquatic plants. Such zones are (and have been) required based on a number of public benefits, such as pollutant treatment, biological community enhancement, and residential subdivision amenity aesthetics. Prior to 2007, the County required littoral zone plantings for any created or expanded waterbody greater than '/2 acre in size, except in cases where the St. Johns River Water Management District (SJRWMD) had permitting jurisdiction and did not require littoral zones due to permanent pool volume design or other design parameters. At that time, the County required that, where used by applicants, littoral zones be planted on a 6:lor flatter slope and cover 30% of the waterbody surface, consistent with SJRWMD requirements. In March 2007, the County, in consideration of recommendations from the Pelican Island Audubon Society, adopted Ordinance 2007-012, which amended the County's littoral zone requirements to apply to expanded or created waterbodies on project sites exceeding 10 acres. Under the 2007 ordinance revisions, the County required littoral zones irrespective of SJRWMD's allowed alternatives to littoral zones, which requirement still applies today. The County's current littoral zone requirements, as revised in 2007 and further reviewed through a series of 2008 mining regulation workshops and hearings, also call for a 10:1 slope, a change from the 6:1(or flatter) slope that was required by the County previous to 2007 and is still required by the SJRWMD when littoral zones are proposed. Also in 2007, the County revised its landscape ordinance to require that, for proposed lakes/ponds or lake/pond systems that are one (1) acre in area or larger, the lake/pond bank must be designed in a "non- rectangular, irregular shape to provide an aesthetic amenity" (see County Code Section 926.10(3), Attachment 1 to this report). M:\LDRs\Littorai zone info\DRPPAC pond shape and littoral zone req staffrpt for 3-21-18.doc 205 1 County Code Section 934.06(2) sets forth the County's littoral zone planting and maintenance requirements (see Attachment 2). Those requirements allow for a variety of littoral zone planting configurations within a lake/pond system. Pond/Lake Maintenance In addition to providing criteria for littoral zone design and plantings, County Code Section 934.06(2) sets forth maintenance requirements for such zones and associated waterbodies, consistent with SJRWMD rules. Attachment 3 to this report is an excerpt from SJRWMD's Environmental Resource Permit Applicant's Handbook relating to wet detention pond design and performance, including littoral zone design and maintenance. Both the County and SJRWMD require 80% coverage of littoral zones by suitable native aquatic plants within a specified timeframe. Indian River County recognizes the public benefits of littoral zones, as evidenced by the County's requirement of such zones for the past 30 years. Over those years, as a result of multiple ordinance workshops and pubic hearings, the County's littoral zone requirements have been tweaked, but the fundamental requirement of littoral zones associated with pond creation has remained, and staff continues to support that requirement or alternatives that provide comparable benefits. Concerning littoral zone and overall pond/lake maintenance, the requirement under Section 926.10(3) that lakes/ponds "be designed in a non -rectangular, irregular shape to provide an aesthetic amenity" has been brought to staff's attention as a potential maintenance challenge, in that irregular shorelines may result in "nooks and crannies" that are difficult to maintain. On that issue, staff's position is that the irregular shape requirement is non-specific enough to allow for design flexibility to address potential maintenance concerns, such as allowing the opportunity to "cluster" littoral zone areas vs. even distribution throughout a pond shoreline, or to undulate the shoreline design in a gradual manner to account for and allow maintenance access once the pond is completed. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Committee review the County's littoral zone and pond design requirements, as codified in the County's code and consider whether or not any changes are warranted. ATTACHMENT: 1. County pond/lake design and landscape criteria [LDR Section 926.10(3)] 2. County littoral zone requirements [LDR Section 934.06(2)] 3. Excerpt from SJRWMD's Environmental Resource Permit Applicant's Handbook M:\LDRs\Littoral zone info\DRPPAC pond shape and littoral zone req staff rpt for 3-2.1-18.doc 206 2 Section 926.10. - Nonvehicular area landscaping standards. (1) General landscaping treatment. All nonvehicular open spaces, on any site proposed for development in all zoning districts, except for single-family dwellings shall conform to the landscaping requirements provided in Section 926.06. Nonvehicular open space is ground that is not covered by buildings, paving, or other structures. (2) Canopy trees required. Canopy trees shall be planted in the nonvehicular open space to meet the following requirements: (a) Multiple -family residential zoning districts and mobile home residential zoning districts requiring site plan approval: a minimum of one tree per each one thousand (1,000) square feet of nonvehicular open space or fraction thereof; (b) Commercial zoning districts (except "heavy commercial") and medical districts: a minimum of one (1) tree per each two thousand (2,000) square feet of nonvehicular open space or fraction thereof; (c) Heavy commercial, and industrial zoning districts: a minimum of one (1) tree per each three thousand (3,000) square feet of nonvehicular open space or fraction thereof. (3) Canopy trees required around lakes/ponds including stormwater retention/detention areas. For proposed lakes/ponds or lake/pond systems that are one (1) acre in area or larger, the lake/pond bank must be designed in a non -rectangular, irregular shape to provide an aesthetic amenity. Regardless of size, all lakes/pond shall have at least three native, water tolerant trees planted per one hundred (100) feet of shoreline. The trees may be clustered along the upland shoreline in a manner that facilitates access for lake maintenance. Littoral zones shall be provided as required in Section 934.05. The common areas contiguous with and above the littoral zones are subject to the non -vehicular landscaping requirements set forth in 926.10. and the landward edges of the littoral zone shall be clearly delineated by a raised lip. (Ord. No. 90-16, § 1, 9-11-90; Ord. No. 97-29, § 9, 12-16-97; Ord. No. 2007-012, § 1, 3-20-07) ATTACH ENT 1 207 Section 934.06, - Mining standards. (1) Procedural sequence. Mining operations are subject to the following procedural sequence: (a) Discussion or "pre -application" meeting with SJRWMD. (b) Traffic impact methodology meeting with Public Worksfrraffic Engine (c) Site plan pre -application conference. (d) Formal site plan submittal, (e) Initial TRC review. (f) Final TRC review. (g) Planning and Zoning Commi '.n review and approval. 1. Reviewed by Be. . of County Commissioners if appealed. (h) Initial annua ning permit. (i) "Pre- .nstruction"/site work meeting with staff. Annual mining permit renewal. Site restoration and final inspection/closeout. (k) (2) Littoral zone and water management. On project sites exceeding ten (10) acres in area, any excavation or mining activity in the unincorporated county which results In the creation or expansion of a waterbody (as defined In Chapter 901) shall be subject to the following standards, except as specifically exempted in section 934.04. The requirements of this section shall not apply to small lot single-family subdivisions, which are intended to provide workforce or affordable housing. (a) A littoral zone(s) shall be established as part of the created waterbody. A design and management plan must be submitted which shall: 1. Include a topographic map of the proposed littoral zone(s) showing the control elevation contour and the minus two -and -one -half -foot control water elevation contour, and include a cross-sectional view of the littoral zone(s) planting design, showing the required slopes from the top of the bank to a depth of two and one-half (236.) feet below the control water elevation; 2. Specify how vegetation is to be established, including the extent, method, type and timing of any planting provided; 3. Provide a description of any water management procedures to be followed in order to ensure the continued viability and health of the littoral zones; 4. Include a plan view which documents the location and extent of the littoral zones, including the percentage of the waterbody surface area (at control elevation) covered by vegetated littoral zones. (b) The established littoral zone(s) shall consist of native vegetation, and shall be maintained permanently as part of the waterbody. All landscaping, littoral zone revegetation plans and lake management plans shall comply with St. John[s] River Water Management District rules. (c) Littoral zone design requirements: 1. The slope for the planted littoral zone shall be no steeper than one (1) foot vertical to ten (10) feet horizontal to a distance of five (5) feet waterward of the designated planted littoral zone area. Excluding the planted littoral zones, slopes shall not exceed one (1) foot vertical to four (4) feet horizontal. Certified drawings of the littoral zone slopes must be sent to the planning division within thirty (30) days of slope construction. 2. Littoral zones shall comprise at least thirty (30) percent of the waterbody surface area, or twenty- one (21) square feet per lineal foot of shoreline, whichever is less. Littoral zones must be located 208 'i HMEHT between one (1) foot above ordinary water level (OWL) and two (2) feet below OWL, as determined by the applicant's engineer or designee unless otherwise approved by the community development director or his designee. 3. The littoral zone shall be provided with a minimum of six (6) inches of sand topsoil mix, unless otherwise approved, and planted with at least five (5) species at an average spacing of two (2) feet on center. Inter -plant spacing will vary with species, and must be depicted on the littoral zone vegetation plan. 4. A minimum of one (1) tree shall be provided for every five hundred (500) square feet of littoral zone coverage. The proposed trees must be a minimum of five (5) feet in height at time of planting (measured at planting depth) and consist of native, freshwater wetland varieties (e.g. red bay, red maple, bald cypress, loblolly bay). 5. Appropriate species for littoral zone plantings, including trees, are fisted in Chapter 926. Appendix E. (d) Conformance: 1. The planted littoral zone shall meet eighty (80) percent coverage within six (6) months, and be less than five (5) percent exotic or invasive non-native plant species after the first year. Monitoring reports are required, and must be submitted to staff at time zero (0), ninety (90) days, six (6) months, and one (1) year after planting. The applicant must notify the planning division forty-eight (48) hours prior to completion 'of littoral zone planting. 2. For subdivision or affidavit of exemption projects, littoral planting zones shall be preserved and maintained as a common improvement, and shall be identified graphically and in writing in a restrictive covenant in a form acceptable to the county attorney's office. The plat or affidavit of exemption document shall reference the restrictive covenant. The restrictive covenant shall be reviewed by the planning division and county attorney's office prior to recording. 3. Planting of the littoral zones shall be completed prior to issuance of a certificate of completion or the first certification of occupancy for any lot adjacent to or abutting the lake, whichever occurs first. 4. All excavations must comply with "Best Management Practices for the Construction Industry." 5. Planted littoral zones must be maintained in perpetuity in compliance with these planting requirements and with "Best Management Practices." 6. For mining projects that propose agricultural use as part of the site restoration plan, installation of littoral zone plants, with the exception of shoreline trees as required in subsection 934.06(2)(c)4, shall not be required until the site Is converted to a nonagricultural use. All other Littoral Zone and Water Management standards, including provision of littoral zone slopes, and installation of shoreline trees, shall be satisfied and completed at the time of mining site restoration. (e) The water management system, including swales and interconnected wetlands and lakes, must be specifically designed to Inhibit siltation and eutrophication processes. To ensure this, the applicant must submit an environmental management and lake monitoring plan, specifying the method for monitoring the system and corrective actions should eutrophication and/or siltation occur. (0 A fifteen -foot -wide access maintenance easement shall be provided for every one thousand (1,000) feet of shoreline. This easement shall extend from below control elevation of the lake to a public or private road right-of-way, and shall be labeled and depicted on the site plan and stormwater management permit plans. (g) The littoral zone will be considered as fully creditable towards the 2:1 mitigation ratio for freshwater 209 emergent wetlands; (ref. Chapter 928, Wetland and Deepwater Habitat Protection). (h) Off-site discharge shall meet all applicable state and federal water quality standards, including standards for turbidity and other regulated constituents and parameters. The method for testing, collecting, and reporting baseline and monitoring data to the SJRWMD shall be noted, and testing/monitoring locations shall be depicted on the site plan and stormwater management permit plans. (3) Groundwater and environmental protection. (a) All applicable state and federal groundwater and groundwater impact regulations shall be satisfi (b) Excavation activity shall occur only above the confining layer. (c) All existing or proposed on-site wells that penetrate the confining layer shall either be gro rid and plugged in accordance with SJRWMD standards or brought up to current SJRWMD standat-ds for such wells. Such wells shall be properly plugged or upgraded and properly monumented . d flagged prior to issuance of the initial mining permit. (d) The following setbacks shall be maintained from excavation areas below the wr season groundwater level (excludes temporary recharge ditches and similar temporary excavatio s used for water recharge): 1. Thirty (30) feet to any plugged or unplugged well that penetrates t confining layer. 2. One hundred (100) feet to preserved on-site jurisdictional wetla ds or native uplands. 3. Three hundred 9300) feet to known off-site jurisdictional we nds, native uplands, and improved pasture lands. 4. One thousand (1,000) feet to the nearest existing or pr posed city or county public water supply well that uses the surficial aquifer (the aquifer that 'es above the confining layer) as a source of potable water. (e) The mining operation shall not adversely affect th 'hydro-period of preserved Jurisdictional wetlands on site or known off-site jurisdictional wetlands. T project site plan, stormwater management plans, and pollution prevention plans shall demonstrat ow the hydro-period of on-site and known off-site jurisdictional wetlands will be maintained o the satisfaction of SJRWMD. Extraction and on-site processing tech iques that involve blasting or use of active chemical agents are prohibited. This prohibition Is baseon a finding that such techniques are not necessary to extract or process recoverable materials k .wn to exist within Indian River County, and is intended to avoid potential adverse groundwat impacts as well as noise and vibration nuisances. (g) Any contaminated soils id= tified on site shall be handled in accordance with applicable state and federal standards, as directed . the Department of Health (DOH). (h) Project site plans a permit plans shall incorporate all appropriate recommendations and best management pr. tices (BMPs) contained or identified within the project hydrology report. The county is authorized to - gage professional services to review project hydrology reports and charge applicants the cost of suc services. 1. U receipt of a project hydrology report, the county has sixty (60) days to provide the applicant omments on the hydrology report. Prior to scheduling the project for consideration by the Planning and Zoning Commission, the applicant shall respond to each comment in writing. c and nuisance mitigation. The noise and nuisance requirements of Chapter 974 shall be satisfied. Normal operation of vehicles shall be deemed to meet Chapter 974 requirements. 1. Pumps, crushers, and processing equipment (including portable equipment but not including 'vehicles) used on site shall be placed behind berms, located below surrounding ground level, or (f) 210 A. ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE PERMIT APPLICANT'S HANDBOOK, VOLUME II: FOR USE WITHIN THE GEOGRAPHIC LIMITS OF THE ST. JOHNS RIVER WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT October 1, 2013 ST. JOHNS RIVER WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT 4049 Reid Street Palatka, FL 32177-2529 (386) 329-4500 A HMENT a 211 8.0 Wet Detention Design and Performance Criteria. 8.1 Description These systems are permanently wet ponds which are designed to slowly release collected stormwater runoff through an outlet structure. A schematic of a typical wet detention system is shown in Figure 8-1. There are several components in a wet detention system which must be properly designed to achieve the required level of stormwater treatment. A description of each design feature and its importance to the treatment process is presented below. The design and performance criteria for wet detention systems are discussed below. 8.2 Treatment Volume For wet detention systems, the design treatment volume is the greater of the following: (a) one inch of runoff over the drainage area (b) 2.5 inches times the impervious area (excluding water bodies) Additional treatment volume is required for systems which discharge directly to Class I, Class II, Outstanding Florida Waters, or Class III waters which are approved, conditionally approved, restricted, or conditionally restricted for shellfish harvesting (see section 8.13 of this Volume). 8-1 212 T.O.B. y� TT j t If n -r Littoral zone creation (if required) Outfall structure Sod Peak attenuation (if required) Th Weir Average water fable elevation 6 1 1 v NWL Treatment volume —' r(Tz` Control Elevation Permanent pool (Max. depth = 12 ft.) Tib -m! 111- iut 1 "' = fr 8.3 Recovery Time The outfall structure shall be designed to drawdown one-half the required treatment volume within 24 and 30 hours following a storm event, but no more than one-half of this volume will be discharged within the first 24 hours. 8.4 Outlet Structure The outlet structure generally includes a drawdown device (such as an orifice, "V" or square notch weir) set to establish a normal water control elevation and slowly release the treatment volume (see Figures 8-2 and 8-3 for schematics). The design of the outfall structure must also accommodate the passage of ground water baseflows and flows from upstream stormwater management systems (see Figure 8- 4). The control elevation shall be set at or above the design tailwater elevation so the pond can effectively recover the treatment storage. Also, drawdown devices smaller than 6 square inches of cross-section area that is 2 inches wide or less than 20 degrees for "V" notches shall include a device to eliminate clogging. Examples of such devices include baffles, grates, screens, and pipe elbows. 8.5 Permanent Pool The permanent pool shall be sized to provide at least a 14 -day average residence time during the wet season (June - October). Additional permanent pool volume may be required for wet detention systems which directly discharge to Class I, Class II, or Outstanding Florida Waters (see section 8.13 of this Volume). 8-3 214 Cs TN) uozivapp laM T.O.B. Littoral zone creation (if required) Ouffoll structure — Sod Peak attenuation (if required) 1— v Average water table elevation 6 j WL Treatment volume Weir Permanent pool (Max. depth = 12 ft.) Orifice Outflow pipe II=1I►=iIt--1.• Control Elevoiion 00 Typical wet detention outfall structure (N.T.S.) NWt. Emergency overflow Peak discharge attenuation storage (ti required) _ Treoiment volume T Permanent pool volume Overflow weir Bteeddown orifice FRONT VIEW Typical wet detention outfall structure with "V" -notch we Jmer9enc overflow Peak discharge attenuation storage tit required) NWL — — Treatment volume Permanent pool volume Overflow weir V—notch weir 20 min. FRONT VIEW Without Baseflow IEmergency overflow Peak d seharge attenuation storage (0 required) With Brief low Permanent pool volume r Peak d schargo attenuation storage W required) Treatment volume ____ .________. — PIWL Basefiow Discharge Capacity 8.6 Littoral Zone The littoral zone is that portion of a wet detention pond which is designed to contain rooted aquatic plants. The littoral area is usually provided by extending and gently sloping the sides of the pond down to a depth of 2-3 feet below the normal water level or control elevation. Also, the littoral zone can be provided in other areas of the pond that have suitable depths (i.e., a shallow shelf in the middle of the lake). The littoral zone is established with native aquatic plants by planting and/or the placement of wetland soils containing seeds of native aquatic plants. A specific vegetation establishment plan must be prepared for the littoral zone. The plan must consider the hydroperiod of the pond and the type of plants to be established. Livingston et al. (1988) has published a list of recommended native plant species suitable for littoral zone planting. In addition, a layer of muck can be incorporated into the littoral area to promote the establishment of the wetland vegetation. When placing muck, special precautions must be taken to prevent erosion and turbidity problems in the pond and at its discharge point while vegetation is becoming established in the littoral zone. The following is a list of the design criteria for wet detention littoral zones: (a) The littoral zone shall be gently sloped (6H:1 V or flatter). At least 30 percent of the wet detention pond surface area shall consist of a littoral zone. The percentage of littoral zone is based on the ratio of vegetated littoral zone to surface area of the pond at the control elevation. (b) The treatment volume should not cause the pond level to rise more than 18 inches above the control elevation unless the applicant affirmatively demonstrates that the littoral zone vegetation can survive at greater depths. (c) Within 24 months of completion of the system or as specified by permit condition, 80 percent coverage of the littoral zone by suitable aquatic plants is required. (d) Planting of the littoral zone is recommended to meet the 80% coverage requirement. As an alternative to planting, portions of the littoral zone may be established by placement of wetland top soils (at least a four inch depth) containing a seed source of desirable native plants. When utilizing this alternative, the littoral zone must be stabilized by mulching or other means and at least the portion of the littoral zone within 25 feet of the inlet and outlet structures must be planted. 8.7 Littoral Zone Alternatives 8-8 219 As an option to establishing and maintaining vegetative littoral zones as described in section 8.6, the applicant can provide either: (a) An additional 50% of the appropriate permanent pool volume as required in section 8.5 or 8.13, or (b) Pre-treatment of the stormwater prior to the stormwater entering the wet detention pond. The level of pre-treatment must be at least that required for retention, underdrain, exfiltration, or swale systems. See section 8.11 of this Volume for additional information on pre-treatment. 8.8 Pond Depth Wet detention systems shall provide for a maximum pond depth of 12 feet and a mean depth (pond volume divided by the pond area at the control elevation) between 2 and 8 feet. 8.9 Pond Configuration The average length to width ratio of the pond must be at least 2:1. If short flow paths are unavoidable, the effective flow path can be increased by adding diversion barriers such as islands, peninsulas, or baffles to the pond. Inlet structures should be designed to dissipate the energy of water entering the pond. Examples of good and poor pond configurations are given in Figure 8-5. 8-9 220 Examples of good and poor wet detention pond configurations (N.T.S.) Poor Pond Configuration Length : Width ratio < 2:1 Good Pond Configuration Length : Width ratio > 2:1 8.10 Ground Water Table To minimize ground water contributions which may lower treatment efficiencies, the control elevation shall be set at or above the normal on-site ground water table elevation (Yousef et al. 1990). This elevation may be determined by calculating the average of the seasonal high and seasonal low ground water table elevations. Ground water inflow (baseflow) must be considered when the control elevation is set below the normal ground water table elevation or the project utilizes underdrains (i.e., road underdrains) to control ground water conditions on-site. The design of the outfall structure must provide for the discharge of baseflow at the design normal water level in the pond. Baseflow rates must be included in the drawdown calculations for the outfall structure. Baseflow shall also be considered in the permanent pool residence time design. Establishment of the normal water level in the pond will also be influenced by baseflow conditions (see Figure 8-4). 8.11 Pre-treatment "Pre-treatment" is defined as the treatment of a portion of the runoff prior to its entering the wet detention pond. Pre-treatment increases the pollutant removal efficiency of the overall stormwater system by reducing the pollutant loading to the wet detention pond. Pre-treatment may be used to enhance the appearance of the wet detention pond or meet the additional treatment criteria for discharges to receiving water which are classified as Class I, Class II, Outstanding Florida Waters (OFWs), or Class II1 waters which are approved, conditionally approved, restricted, or conditionally restricted for shellfish harvesting. For developments where the appearance of the lake is important, pre-treatment can reduce the chances of algal blooms and slow the eutrophication process. Some types of pre-treatment practices include utilizing vegetative swales for conveyance instead of curb and gutter, perimeter swales or berms around the lake, oil and grease skimmers on inlet structures, retention storage in swales with raised inlets, or shallow landscaped retention areas (when soils and water table conditions will allow for adequate percolation). For systems in which pre-treatment is utilized to meet the additional design criteria requirements for systems which direct discharge to Class I, Class II, OFWs, or Class III waters which are approved, conditionally approved, restricted, or conditionally restricted. for shellfish harvesting , pre-treatment practices must meet the appropriate design and performance criteria for that BMP. Acceptable types of pre-treatment include the following: (a) Retention systems which meet the design and performance criteria in section 5, 8-11 222 (b) Underdrain systems which meet the design and performance criteria in section 6, (c) Exfiltration trench section 7, or (d) Swales systems which meet the design and performance criteria in section 9. Alternative pre-treatment methods will be evaluated on a case-by-case basis by the District. Applicants or system designers are encouraged to meet with District staff in a pre -application conference if alternative methods are proposed. 8.12 Pond Side Slopes The pond must be designed so that the average pond side slope measured between the control elevation and two feet below the control elevation is no steeper than 3:1 (horizontal:vertical). 8.13 Direct Discharges to Class I, Class II, OFWs, or Shellfishing Waters Wet detention systems which discharge to Class I, Class II, OFWs, or Class III waters which are approved, conditionally approved, restricted, or conditionally restricted for shellfish harvesting, must provide either: (a) An additional fifty percent of both the required treatment and permanent pool volumes (b) Pre-treatment of the stonnwater prior to the stormwater entering the wet detention pond. The level of pre-treatment must be at least that required for retention, underdrain, exfiltration, or swale systems (see section 8.11 of this Volume). 8.14 References Camp Dresser & McKee Inc (CDM). 1985. An Assessment of Stormwater Management Programs. Prepared for Florida Department of Environmental Regulation, Tallahassee, Florida. Livingston, E.H., E. McCarron, J. Cox, P. Sanzone. 1988. The Florida Land Development Manual: A Guide to Sound Land and Water Management. Florida Department of Environmental Regulation, Nonpoint Source Management Section, Tallahassee, Florida. Yousef, Y.A., M.P. Wanielista, L.Y. Lin, and M. Brabham. 1990. Efficiency Optimization of Wet Detention Ponds for Urban Stormwater Management (Phase I and 11). University of Central Florida, Orlando, Florida 8-12 223 Item 4a INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Members of the Development Review and Permit Process Advisory Committee Stan Boling, AICP Community Development Director September 5, 2018 Consideration of Committee Recommendation on County Stormwater Pond/Lake Design and Littoral Zone Slope Requirements It is requested that the Development Review and Permit Process Advisory Committee consider the following information at the Committee's meeting of September 19, 2018. BACKGROUND At its March 21, 2018 meeting, the Committee considered information presented by staff and discussed County littoral zone planting requirements which have been in place since March 2007. During discussion it was reported that the current (11 year old) requirements were the result of recommendations and public input from a number of stakeholders with expertise, and that in practice the current regulations provided design flexibility while yielding benefits of habitat creation, aesthetics, and water quality treatment. Staff noted that only minor changes could be made to the requirements without also changing the Comprehensive Plan which includes specific policies on providing littoral zones in new developments (see Attachment 3). During Committee discussion, concerns were expressed regarding maintenance, nuisance situations, and attracting wildlife to stormwater areas possibly containing heavy metals from road run-off (see Attachment 1). After the March 21, 2018 meeting, Committee member Chuck Mechling met with staff (John McCoy and Roland DeBlois) and an engineer to discuss practical matters related to the County's existing littoral zone requirements. In the end, it seemed that the County had sufficient design flexibility except for one issue: the minimum slope requirement of the littoral zone planting area. The current County code requires a 10'horizontal to 1'vertical minimum slope requirement versus a flatter minimum slope requirement in the Comprehensive Plan of only 6' horizontal to 1' vertical. That difference is not a conflict but does represent a stricter code standard intentionally adopted in 2007. As stated during the Committee's June 26, 2018 follow-up discussion on the issue, the steeper 6:1 slope takes up less stormwater common area than the flatter 10:1 slope and would allow more development area for lots, allowing for more lots and reducing costs on a per lot basis. At the June 26, 2019 meeting, Committee members indicated a desire to consider the slope requirement issue at a future meeting and staff agreed to bring the matter back to the Committee (see Attachment 2). F:\Community Development\Development Review and Permit Process Advisory Committee (DRPPAC)\09-19-18 Mecting\Item 4a - County 224 Stormwater Pond Lake Design and Littoral Zone Slope Requirements,docx Item 4a The Committee now needs to consider making a recommendation (or not) on the County's littoral zone slope requirements. ANALYSIS Littoral zone planting shelf areas need to be established at a relatively flat slope to function well, providing a good environment for shoreline and shallow wetland plantings in an environment of fluctuating water levels. According to Professor Gail Hansen (UF Department of Environmental Horticulture Center for Landscape Conservation and Ecology), water bodies that do not fluctuate greatly on average need a gentler or flatter littoral zone slope. Dr. Hansen referred staff to Collier County littoral zone standards (minimum slope of 8:1; see Attachment 4) and Pinellas County standards (4:1 minimum and 10:1 desirable). Staff s research indicates that littoral zone minimum slope requirements vary but tend to fall between 6:1 and 10:1 (see Attachment 4). A sample of minimum littoral zone requirements or BMPs (Best Management Practices) is as follows: Indian River County 10:1 Pinellas County 10:1 (desirable) Collier County 8:1 Jacksonville 8:1 Lake County 6:1 FDOT/Water Management Districts 6:1 Pinellas County 4:1 (minimum) Unlike other issues discussed by the Committee, the littoral zone planting slope requirement is an important practical and technical development issue but it is not a development process issue. To date, the Committee has focused its efforts on process -related issues resulting in review process streamlining and associated development regulation changes. With respect to, littoral zone slope requirements, it is staff's position that rather than making a specific technical recommendation it would be more appropriate for the Committee to identify littoral zone slope requirements as an important substantive issue needing review by stakeholders with expertise and consideration by the Board of County Commissioners. Consequently, staff believes that the Committee should recommend that the Board of County Commissioners consider initiating a review of the issue with stakeholders. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Committee recommend that the Board of County Commissioners direct staff to conduct an evaluation of littoral zone slope requirements with stakeholders and report back to the Board of County Commissioners. ATTACHMENTS 1. Minutes from March 21, 2018 Committee Meeting 2. Minutes from June 26, 2018 Committee Meeting 3. Indian River County Comprehensive Plan Littoral Zone Policies 4. Littoral Zone Slope Requirements in Other Jurisdictions F:\Community Development\Development Review and Permit Process Advisory Committee (DRPPAC)\09-19-18 Meeting\Item 4a - County 2S5 Stormwater Pond Lake Design and Littoral Zone Slope Requirements.docx Mr. Brown noted that the requirements have been through a committee at s point in time and there are many different perspectives on what . . r not. Re- evaluating tree protection requirements will involve - group of interested parties. Ms. Robinson re. u - - : at this issue be tabled and be brought back at a future meetin • , " pecific examples to look at in more detail. By way of consensus the mittee members agreed to bring this item back for further discussion. b) Consideration of County Stormwater Pond/Lake Design and Littoral Zone Requirements Mr. DeBlois explained that the littoral zone is the portion of a pond or lake that is designed to contain rooted aquatic plants and are required based on a number of public benefits, such as pollutant treatment, biological community enhancement and residential subdivision amenity aesthetics. Mr. McCoy noted that the requirements are to make project sites look more natural and that staff will work with applicants to meet the requirements. Mr. Mechling cited some examples of ponds that are basically square or regular in shape, but are planted so the shape is softened, and confirmed that staff always works with applicants on pond design. Mr. Taylor shared some other examples used in the design of ponds that provide better aesthetics. Mr. Boling stated that it could be beneficial to come up with some specific criteria to codify the flexibility used in practice. Mr. Szpyrka suggested that the criteria should not be so restrictive that it boxes the developers into specific configurations. Mr. Blum noted difficulties experienced in placing the ponds and the littoral zones next to home sites. Ms. Robinson agreed that the areas are hard to maintain, especially next to home sites. She added that the lack of proper maintenance can cause issues with water quality from the ponds. Mr. Blum advised that there are some new rules by the Saint John's Water Management District. Mr. Boling stated that it may be worth reviewing ponds out in the field constructed under the old and newer rules as well as habitat creation, water quality and other C:\Users\sjohnson\AppData\Local\Microsoft\Windows\INetCache\Content.Outlook\SEU7ML71\DRPPAC Minutes 03212018.docx APPROVED 4 226 Attachment 1 issues. He noted that anything more than minor changes would require a Comprehensive Plan amendment since current littoral zone standards are required in the Comprehensive Plan. An LDR change would also be required. Ms. Robinson expressed concern with the impact of the ponds on the wildlife as they are designed to carry off heavy metals from the roads and yards that are poisonous to them. Mr. Boling agreed that the ponds do carry hazardous chemicals, but it also provides a place for them to live as pristine habitats have disappeared over time. Mr. Mechling stated that the committee could use some input from outside experts and information on plantings and other factors to keep down the algae blooms. Mr. Redus suggested that there needs to be some flexibility to customize the ponds to each project. Mr. Boling agreed that there could be some flexibility, but that there needs to be certain criteria outlined that must be met so that the staff has a standard on which to base their interpretations. Mr. Sweeney added that flexibility without some criteria would slow down the review process. By way of consensus the committee members agreed to bring this item back for further discussion. c) Consideration of Landscaping "Flexibility" Items Mr. Boling provided some background information regarding a proposal to the land development regulation for "infill plantings" and littoral zon which was proposed during the June 20, 2017, Board of County meeting. nge antings, mmissioners Mr. Mechling stated that he would like to look at the di i ences between the current and proposed land development regulations, as • -•posed in the update, as well as a cost analysis of each. Mr. Paladin noted that he would als• e to look at the cost of maintenance of items versus the initial cost under th - rrent and proposed regulations. Ms. Robinson expre = -d concern with obtaining landscaping material that is required as man the growers had been impacted by the hurricanes. Mr. Mec• ' g stated that there is a shortage also because many of the communities imped by the hurricanes had procured the existing stock and there has not been ough time for regrowth. C:\Users\sjohnson\AppData\Local\Microsoft\Windows\INetCache\Content.Outlook\SEU7ML71\DRPPAC Minutes 03212018.docx APPROVED 5 227 Attachment 1 Mr. Boling summarized discussions included a review of a base package inspections fees (subdivisions separate from site plan) with basic or streamlined co for complete/responsive applications and additional costs for incomplete/unre-•onsive applications spelled out. He opined there were more inspections currently th -. there had been in the past due to bigger scaled projects and with workforce not fro the area, who are responsible for the construction. Vice Chairman Paladin opined one of the problems be' a development project from 15 years past, experienced next to the old development, changed the old develop realized now was when ew development being built nt; i.e., drainage. Chairperson Robinson asked for sta o bring back more data for clearer justification on costs for inspections. (c) Date for Se • tember October Meetin • s - Action Required Mr. Boling confirmed - s committee would not be meeting in the months of July and August. It was th- •nsensus of the Committee members to continue regular schedule meetings b- . nning in September, and October; the third Wednesday morning at 9:00 a.m. Mr.: • ing stated October, 2018 was the 12 month sunset date for this committee's work, - ess the Board of County Commissioners extended the date. He shared the Co ittee had two remaining matters to focus on in the remaining two meetings: velopment review fees and any final process items. Other Matters (a) Littoral Shelf and Lake Shape Regulations - Chuck Mechling Mr. Mechling reported he met with John McCoy and Roland Deblois in Community Development to discuss the level of difficulty or practicality for an engineer, when planning a small 10 -acre project with a storm retention concept, with the lake being required to be regular shaped, having several steps to incorporate, as well as the financial costs for those requirements. Mr. John McCoy confirmed the LDRs required a 10 -to -1 slope; wherein the comprehensive plan required a 6 -to -1 slope; two variant slopes depending upon what was being reviewed. Mr. Mechling stated it appeared the County had flexibility in case- by-case projects, depending upon the size, shape and justification. Mr. McCoy said from an LDR perspective, evaluating whether some objective language criteria could be included for lake shape, such as "including, but not limited to" would eliminate some of the back and forth reviews and provide guidance within the LDRs for design professionals. C:\Users\kcharest\AppData\Local\Microsoft\Windows\Temporary Internet Files\Content.Outlook\14HORIBI\06 2618 Minutes.docx UNAPPROVED 7 228 Attachment 2 Mr. Boling stated there was flexibility in the Code and in practice; however, it may make sense to place additional examples in the Code to communicate better. He said in reference to the slope differences, the comprehensive plan sets a minimum, with the LDRs being stricter. He continued the question was whether this committee wished to review the issue, which was not a development process issue. Mr. Mechling stated he hoped this committee would wish to review the slope differences as it made a huge design difference, as well as a relevant cost difference. Mr. Boling agreed to bring this issue back to the committee for discussion. Announcement of Next Meeting The next meeting of the Development Review and Permit Pro - : dvisory Committee will be Wednesday, September 19, 2018 at 9:00 • onference Room B1-501, Building B, 1800 27th Street, Vero Beach. Adjournment Th - - • - ing no further business, Chairperson Robinson adjourned the meeting at a.m. C:\Users\kcharest\AppData\Local\Microsoft\Windows\Temporary Internet Files\Content.Outlook\14HORIBI\06 26 18 Minutes.docx UNAPPROVED 8 229 Attachment 2 Comprehensive Plan Conservation Element enforcement actions, as necessary, to ensure the protection of wetlands and surface water quality. Policy 2.7: The county shall prohibit the creation of new navigable canals or waterways connected to the Indian River Lagoon or St. Sebastian River. Excavation of any existing canal shall not be for the purpose of obtaining fill. Maintenance dredging of existing artificial navigable canals shall be the minimum necessary to accomplish the dredging purpose and shall be permitted in accordance with FDEP Rule 40C -4.051(11)(b), F.A.C., and under Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899, as administered by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. Policy 2.8: The county, in its land development regulations, shall require littoral zone vegetation plantings for artificially created ponds on project sites exceeding ten (10) acres in area. When littoral zones are required, the following minimum requirements shall apply: A minimum of 30 percent of the waterbody surface area or 21 square feet per lineal foot of shoreline, whichever is less, shall be planted with native littoral vegetation, and shall be maintained permanently as part of the waterbody; A minimum of one (1) tree, consisting of a native freshwater wetland species, shall be planted for every 500 square feet of littoral zone coverage; The water management system shall be designed to prevent siltation and eutrophication; ➢''. A design and management plan, specifying remedial methods for correcting potential siltation, eutrophication, and/or infestation by nuisance species, shall be required; receu(id W-1- 2.6t3 ➢\ Consistent with Florida Administrative Code (FAC) Section 40C -42.026(4)(d), the planted littoral zone area shall consist of a 6:1 or flatter slope. Policy 2.9: Consistent with Policy 4.2 of the Stormwater Management Sub -Element, the county shall, by 2012, request a formal meeting with representatives from all of the F.S. 298 Special Drainage Districts in the county to discuss the following issues: conducting comprehensive basin inventories, adopting maximum discharge limitations and pollutant load reduction goals (PLRGs), and setting level -of -service standards for water quality and flood protection. Policy 2.10: Consistent with Policy 2.5 of the Coastal Management Element and Objective 7 of the Stormwater Management Sub -Element, the county will establish water quality level - of -service (WQLOS) standards for each drainage basin identified in the Stormwater Community Development Department Indian River County 124 230 Attachment 3 Comprehensive Plan Stormwater Management Sub -Element Policy 7.12: The county shall require littoral zone vegetation plantings for all new artificially created ponds on project sites exceeding ten (10) acres in area.' Policy 7.13: The county shall pursue grant funding to establish stormwater filtration systems on the North and South Main Relief Canals. OBJECTIVE 8 Land Use Through 2030, all land uses and land use densities within Indian River County will be in compliance with the Future Land Use Plan map. Policy 8.1: The county will allow only low density land uses in areas designated as flood prone (within the 100 year floodplain) as depicted on the Future Land Use Map. The only exception is where platted subdivisions were developed prior to existing regulations. Policy 8.2: The county will assess the drainage capability of all lands proposed for a change in land use designation and not approve land use changes where drainage service levels will not be met. Policy 8.3: The county shall promote infill development by improving and maintaining the existing drainage facilities in the developed areas of the county. PLAN IMPLEMENTATION An important part of any plan is its implementation. Implementation involves execution of the plan's policies by taking actions and achieving results. For the Stormwater Management Sub -Element, implementation involves various activities. While some of these actions will be ongoing, others are activities that will be taken by certain points in time. For each policy in this element, Table 3.E.2 identifies the type of action required, the entity or entities responsible for taking the action, the timing, and whether or not the policy necessitates a capital expenditure. To implement the Stormwater Management Sub -Element, several types of actions must be taken. These include, but are not limited to: development of new stormwater facilities, upgrading/retrofitting existing stormwater facilities, revising land development regulations and ordinances, intergovernmental coordination and execution of interlocal agreements, establishing a stormwater utility, and development and adoption of a stormwater master plan. Community Development Department Indian River County 45 231 Attachment 3 Inflow Baffle o• Skimmer S H WT Treat me nt Volume Lit-ored Zone (3.5') Softment Sump Outfall Structure with Bleed -Down Orifice Deeper Area —r Inflow Si'�I1JdT ''� Treatment Volume f7;15-7-- Littered 51Littoral Zone (3.51 10:1 Slope (Desirable) 14:1 Minimum) SHWT— Seasonal High Water Table Sediment Sump lJ t'' Outfall Structure with V -Notch Weir Deeper Area 10:1 Slope (Desirable} (4:1 Minimum) SHWT— Seasonal High Water Table Attachment 4 Design Guidelines for County Required Littoral Shelf Planting Areas (LSPA) [STEP 1: Consult Regulations The requirements for design, maintenance and alteration of Littoral Shelf Planting Areas (LSPAs) can be found in the Collier County Land Development Code Chapter 3, Section 3.05.10. https://library.municode.com/HTML/13992/level2/CH3REPR 3.05.00VEREPRPR.html# CH3REPR 3.05.00VEREPRPR 3.05.07PRST#TOPTITLE For information about regulated exotics refer to Chapter 5B-64.011 of the F.A.C. [STEP 2: Determine the Hydroperiod A hydroperiod can be defined as the number of days per year that an area of land is dry or the length of time that there is standing water at a location (Gaff et al. 2000). Hydroperiods are one of the biggest factors affecting littoral plants within a stormwater lake and should be considered whenever designing a littoral shelf planting area (LSPA). Hydroperiod and planting elevation in a stormwater lake are interconnected. The tolerance level of different wetland plants varies. Some plants can survive in deeper water with year-round flooding. Other plants cannot survive deep water but still need some flooding. Once the hydroperiod of a lake is approximated, each plant's maximum water depth and flooding duration must be considered before determining its planting elevation. Table 1 lists the approximate hydroperiod ranges for some typical native wetland plants. The plants have been divided into 4 planting zones (Figure 1). These planting zones are determined based on a plant's maximum water depth (the maximum water depth under which a plant can survive) and flooding duration (the amount of time a plant can survive under water). 1 Collier County Natural Resources Dept July 2f84 Attachment 4 Control Elevation (C.E.) or wet season water table Figure 1. Planting Zones (A) Deep — These plants need at least 9 —11 months of flooding per year and can survive in] water that is 3 feet deep or greater. [(B) Mid — These plants need at least 3.5 — 8.5 months of flooding per year and can survive in' water that is 2 to 3 feet deep. r(C) Shallow — These plants typically grow in water that is 1 to 2 feet deep and are inundated by water for at least 2.5 months annually. '(D) Transitional — These plants can survive in water that is 0 to 1 foot deep and do not need to be completely flooded. Some just require wet or soggy soils. [Step 3: Determine Planting Elevation Most stormwater pond levels in Collier County fluctuate quite a bit between the wet and dry seasons. Each elevation along a shoreline has a different hydroperiod and is based on the yearly fluctuation between the Dry Season Water Table (DSWT) and the Control Elevation (C.E.). The DSWT should be the average water elevation during the driest time of the year — typically the months of April and May. The C.E. (wet season water table) should be the average water elevation during the wettest time of the year — typically the months of September and October. Some lakes may only fluctuate by 1 foot; others may fluctuate by as much as 6 feet. In ponds with a fluctuation of 5' or greater, plant survival can be a challenge. It is advised that only the hardiest of plant species be chosen in lakes with this type of fluctuation. This will increase the likelihood of vegetative success and higher potential for propagation. Hardy species might include: spikerush, soft rush, bulrush, alligator flag and sand cord grass. 2 Collier County Natural Resources Dept July am Attachment 4 Table 2 is an estimate of the planting elevations for the groups of plants from Table 1, according to average water level fluctuation Table 2. Estimated Planting Elevations Based on Hydroperiod Fluctuation Zone &Cp[3fluctuation Zone (A) & (B) 2' or greater below C.E. (C) & (D) 0' - 2' below C.E. Zone J'Cpgreater fluctuation (A) 3' or greater below C.E. (B) 2'- 3' below C.E. (C) 1'- 2' below C.E. (D) 0' to 1' below C.E. This is a simplified table. When designing a LSPA, keep in mind that many plants and trees may fit multiple categories. Some (A) plants may survive at (B), (C), and (D) plant levels; some (B) plants may survive at (C) and (D) plant levels, and so on. Just remember that almost all of these plants will be underwater at some point during an average rainfall year. 3 Collier County Natural Resources Dept July 2(36 Attachment 4 [Step 4: Select Design If you are modifying an existing pond to meet current code or are excavating a new pond, the current littoral planting code is intended to concentrate the littoral plantings in one area of the lake — a Littoral Shelf Planting Area (Figure 2). Keep inmind that the design figures below are examples and only original plans specific to each unique site will be accepted as part of the permit submittal. Littoral Planting Shelf Area Figure 2 Each pond is different and designs can vary. Figures 3 — 8 represent possible LSPA design cross-sections. These are only suggested guides and the LSPA design should not be based solely on these figures. 4 Collier County Natural Resources Dept July 2rsq Attachment 4 Figure 3 5 Collier County Natural Resources Dept July Attachment 4 Figure 5 Figure 6 Figure 7 6 Collier County Natural Resources Dept July 9 Attachment 4 Bulkhead Figure 8 (A) For retrofitting older ponds, refer to Collier County Land Development Code Chapter 3, Section 3.05.10. Section C specifically outlines the requirements for existing lakes. Historically, littoral shelves within Collier County have been planted on stormwater lake shorelines graded at a 4:1 slope (Figure 9). If your pond was in existence before 2001, you most likely have a 4:1 slope. This steep slope will limit the planting design to a thin strip of vegetation that lines the shore (Figure 10). 7 Collier County Natural Resourcys.Qeat July 301 Attacnmen Figure 10 [Current LSPA Design Requirements and Other Suggestions > The LSPA must have an average slope of 8:1. Terraced step- downs in elevation can have a larger slope as long as flatter areas are present to create an average slope of 8:1 > Only the surface where the LSPA is planted is required to be at an 8:1 slope. The remaining shoreline can be sloped with a maximum 4:1 slope. ➢ If you have a steeper (>4:1 slope) shoreline outside the LSPA, Bacopa is a good ground cover that will follow the water line. It may brown slightly during drier months, but will benefit from irrigation run-off produced by existing sprinkler systems. Bacopa should help with erosion control on steeply sloped shorelines. > GRASS CARP AND LSPAs DO NOT MIX!!!! Grass carp will eat aquatic plants. If you already have grass carp, you may need to exclude themfrom the LSPA's to prevent plant damage. Consult FL Fish and Wildlife for additional information http://mvfwc.com/wildlifehabitats/invasive-plants/grass-carp/. 8 Collier County Natural Resources.Deot July 3Qzoi Attathmen Table 1: Suggested Plants for Littoral Shelf Planting Area (LSPA) and Stormwater Retention Ponds in Collier County c nr Oty Proposed Elevation Below C.E. (feet) Planting Zone Plant type Common Name Scientific Name spp. = multiple species within that genus Comments Flooding Duration at Proposed Elevation (months) Size/height requirement Plant Spacing maximum 0 - 1' Transition (D) Herbaceous Salt grass / spike grass Distichlis spicato Brackish water only 0 - 2. 12" min 36" on center 0 - 1' Transition (D) Herbaceous Muhly grass Muhlenbergia capillaris 0 - 2 12" min 36" on center 0 - 1' Transition (D) Herbaceous Seashore paspalum Paspalum vaginatum Brackish water only 0 - 2 12" min 36" on center 0 - 1' Transition (D) Herbaceous Cord grass Sportina bakeri 0 - 2 12" min 36" on center 0 - 1' Transition (D) Herbaceous Fakahatchee grass Tripsacum dactyloides Can grow very tall but dwarf varieties are available 0 - 2 12" min 36" on center 1- 2' Shallow ( C) Herbaceous Blue maidencane Amphicarpum muhlenbergianum 1- 3 12" min 36" on center 1- 2' Shallow ( C) Herbaceous Canna lily Canna accida Perennial accent plant 1- 3 12" min 36" on center 1- 2' Shallow ( C) Woody -shrub Button bush Cephalanthus occidentalis 1- 3 lgallon 5' 1- 2' Shallow ( C) Woody -tree Buttonwood Conocarpus erectus 1- 3 3gallon/ 4' min 20' 1- 2' Shallow ( C) Herbaceous Swamp lily Crinum americanum Accent plant blooming in summer; mix in with other herbaceous vegetation due to it spreading slowly 1- 3 12" min 36" on center 1- 2' Shallow ( C) Herbaceous Spikerush Eleocharis spp 1- 3 12" min 36" on center 14 1 2' Shallow ( C) Herbaceous Horsetail Equlsetum hvemale Naturalizes; food for waterfowl 1- 3 12" min 36" on center 'A IN 1- 2' Shallow ( C) Woody -tree Dahoon holly Ilex cassine 1- 3 3gallon/ 4' min 20' 9 CoNier County Natural Resources Dept July 2014 Attachment 4 Table 1: Suggested Plants for Littoral Shelf Planting Area (LSPA) and Stormwater Retention Ponds in Collier County +C °Pier 'Covivity Proposed Elevation Below C.E. (feet) Planting Zone Plant type Common Name Scientific Name spp. = multiple species within that genus Comments Flooding Duration at Proposed Elevation (months) Size/height requirement Plant Spacing maximum 1- 2' Shallow ( C) Woody -shrub Christmas Berry Lycium carolinianum Brackish water only 1- 3 lgalion/ 12" min 36" on center 1- 2' Shallow ( C) Herbaceous Muhly grass Muhlenbergia capillaris Colorful pink inflorescence 1- 3 12" min 36" on center 1- 2' Shallow ( C) Herbaceous Maidencane Panicum hemitomon Can be confused with torpedo grass 1- 3 12" min 36" on center 1- 2' Shallow ( C) Herbaceous Pickerelweed Pontedaria cordata Accent plant blooming late summer 1- 3 12" min 36" on center 1- 2' Shallow ( C) Woody -tree Royal palm Roystonea reqina 1- 3 3gallon/ 4' min 20' 1- 2' Shallow ( C) Herbaceous Arrowhead Sagittaria spp 1- 3 12" min 36" on center 2 - 3' Mid (B) Herbaceous Canna lily Canna laccido Perennial accent plant 3 - 6 12" min 36" on center 2 - 3' Mid (B) Herbaceous Sawgrass Cladium iamaicense 3 - 6 12" min 36" on center 2 - 3' Mid (B) Herbaceous Blue flag iris spp. Accent plant blooming in spring 3 - 6 12" min 36" on center 2 - 3' Mid (B) Herbaceous Soft rush / Needle rush Juncus spp. 3 - 6 12" min 36" on center 2 - 3' Mid (B) Woody -tree Red (Swamp) maple Acer rubrum 3 - 6 3gallon/ 4' min 20' 2 - 3' Mid (B) Woody -tree Paurotis Palm Acoelorrhaphe wrightii Multi -stemmed small palm 3 - 6 3gallon/ 4' min 20' N 2 - 3' Mid (B) Woody -tree Cypress Taxodium spp 3 - 6 3gallon/ 4' min 20' .P to 3' - deeper Deep (A) Woody- shrub Giant Leather fern Acrosticum danaeifolium 6 - 9 igallon 5' 10 Collier County Natural Resources Dept July 2014 Attachment 4 Table 1: Suggested Plants for Littoral Shelf Planting Area (LSPA) and Stormwater Retention Ponds in Collier County Proposed Elevation Below C.E. (feet) Planting Zone Plant type Common Name Scientific Name spp. = multiple species within that genus Comments Flooding Duration at Proposed Elevation (months) Size/height requirement Plant Spacing maximum 3' - deeper Deep (A) Woody -tree Pond apple Annona 4labra May not be commercially available 6 - 9 3gallon/ 4' min 20' 3' - deeper Deep (A) Herbaceous Sawgrass Cladium iamaicense Serrated leaves install in areas with minimal maintenance needed. fresh and brackish 6 - 9 12" min 36" on center 3' - deeper Deep (A) Woody -tree Pop ash Fraxinus caroliniana 6 - 9 3gallon/ 4' min 20' 3' - deeper Deep (A) Herbaceous Spatterdock Nuphar advena Small yellow flower 6 - 9 12" N/A 3' - deeper Deep (A) Herbaceous Water lily Nymphaea spp. Showy flower 6 - 9 N/A N/A 3' - deeper Deep (A) Herbaceous Bulrushes Scirpus spp Grows very tall can block pond view 6 - 9 12" min 36" on center 3' - deeper Deep (A) Herbaceous Alligator flag Thalia aeniculata 6 - 9 12" min 36" on center N . A 11 Collier County Natural Resources Dept July 2014 Attachment 4 ,Reference Gaff, H., DeAngelis, D.L., Gross, L.J., Salinas, R., and M. Shorrash. 2000. Ecological Modeling 127:33-52. 12 Collier County Natural Resources. Dept July �QT�} a men 4 Jacksonville Design Guidelines and Best Practices Handbook Prepared By: Miller. Sellen Conner & Walsh 246 Attachment 4 I.'CKSONVII.LE DESIGN li CrrF1.INES AND BEST PRACTICES HANDBOOK 1.1.16 Stormwater Retention Design and Placement Stormwater ponds arc all, too often designed to purely serve a functional use fora site as opposed to being integrally designed as a site amenity. The following design guidelines are focused on improving the visual quality of stormwater design systems as they relate to overall site design. 1.1.16a Wet stormwater ponds shall be designed as integral visual site amenities m a project. Sufficient pond slopes and maintenance casements shall be provided to prevent the fencing of the proposed ponds. Where absolutely necessary, due to safety concerns, the city staff reserves the right to waive this requirement (sec Photo Exhibit 1.1.16a) Upland Tree Aquatic Tr I . Photo Exhibit 1.1.16a Pond slopes and maintenance casements are preferred to avoid pond fencing. 1.1.16b Stormwater ponds shall be designed to have the appearance of natural water bodies to the largest extent possible. Ponds shall be designed to have curvilinear perimeters and shall not be designed to be square or rectilinear in shape or appearance. 1.1.16c Wet stormwater ponds shall be designed to hold water at a controlled elevation that maintains a consistent aesthetic appearance. Ponds shall not be designed to have radical fluctuations in maintained water level. Top of Bank Figure 1.1.16d Typical Wet Pond Littoral Zone Section 161 Site Design Upland Zone (5:1 max.) slope Length Varies Natural Maintained Water Level (NWL) Aquatic Plant Material Littoral Shelf _ (8:1 max.) slope Length Varies 2'-0" Above NWL Water Depth 30" below NWL max. 247 Attachment 4 APPENDIX C STORMWATER MANAGEMENT DESIGN STANDARDS LAKE COUNTY, FLORIDA 1 248 Attachment 4 b. The pond's water storage volume below the outlet structure's control elevation, or the low season water table, shall provide a minimum residence time of 14 days. c. The pond shall be designed with a littoral shelf in accordance with the following: 1) The littoral zone shall be gently sloped 6:1 (horizontal: vertical) or flatter. At least 25 percent of the wet detention system surface area shall consist of a littoral zone. The percentage of littoral zone is based on the ratio of vegetated littoral zone to surface area of the pond at the control elevation. Above the outlet structure's control elevation, the steepest side slopes shall be 4:1 (horizontal: vertical). 2) The pollution abatement volume should not cause the pond level to rise more than 18 -inches above the control elevation unless it is demonstrated that the littoral zone vegetation can survive at greater depths. 3) Eighty percent coverage of the littoral zone by suitable aquatic plants is required within the first twenty-four months of completion of the system. 4) To meet the 80% coverage requirement, planting of the littoral zone is recommended. As an alternative, portions of the littoral zone may be established by placement of wetland top soils (at least a four inch depth) containing a seed source of desirable native plants. When utilizing this alternative, the littoral zone must be stabilized by mulching or other means and at least the portion of the littoral zone within 25 feet of the inlet and outlet structures must be planted. d. In lieu of the requirements in Part V.D.(2)c. above, the applicant may provide either of the following: 1) At least fifty percent additional permanent pool volume over that specified in paragraph (b), above; or 2) Pre-treatment of the stormwater pursuant to paragraph A.(1) and A.(2) of the Pollution Abatement Section. e. Be designed so the flow path through the pond has an average length to width ratio of at least 2:1. The alignment and location of inlets and outlets should be designed to maximize flow paths in the pond. If short flow paths are unavoidable, the effective flow path should be increased by adding diversion barriers such as islands, peninsulas, or baffles to the pond. Inlet structures shall be designed to dissipate the energy of water entering the pond. f. Be designed so that bleed down structure invert elevations are at or above the estimated post -development wet season water table elevation. Provide for permanent maintenance easements or other acceptable legal instruments to allow for access to and maintenance of the system, including the pond, littoral zone, inlets, and outlets. 9 249 Attachment 4 MARCH 2010 DRAFT DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AND WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICTS ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE PERMIT STORMWATER QUALITY APPLICANT'S HANDBOOK DESIGN REQUIREMENTS FOR STORMWATER TREATMENT SYSTEMS IN FLORIDA <insert effective date> Soutl-m. st Florida FLORIDA" Viler Aia,za,.:?elliL'11t Ms/lid .,1 250 Attachment 4 14.0 MANAGED AQUATIC PLANT SYSTEM (MAPS) DESIGN CRITERIA 14.1 Description Managed Aquatic Plant Systems (MAPS) are aquatic plant -based BMPs which remove nutrients through a variety of processes related to nutrient uptake, transformation, and microbial activities. Examples of MAPS include planted littoral zones and floating wetlands. In the latter example, harvesting of the biomass is an essential process of the BMP. Generally, wet detention systems by themselves can't achieve the required levels of nutrient removal from stormwater. In nearly all cases, a BMP treatment train will be required when using a wet detention system. Sometimes components of the BMP treatment train include source controls or pretreatment BMPs such as retention or swales to reduceeither the stormwater volume or nutrient concentrations in stormwater discharged to the wet detention system. However, in many areas, high water tables and slowly percolating soils do not make infiltration practices practical or effective. Managed Aquatic Plant Systems (MAPS) can be incorporated into a wet detention BMP treatment train to provide additional treatment and nutrient removal after the wet pond has provided reduction of pollutants through settling and other mechanisms that occur within the wct pond. 14.2 Nutrient Removal Effectiveness and Credits The stormwater treatment nutrient removal effectiveness and credits for the different types of MAPS shall be based on data obtained from monitoring of these systems in Florida. The nutrient removal credits associated with MAPS shall be calculated using the BMP Treatment Train Equations set forth is Section 1.3 of this Handbook. Table 14.1 summarizes the proposed nutrient reduction credits based on the data that is currently available. It is anticipated that more data will become available and included during the rule adoption process. Table 14.1 Nutrient Removal Credits for MAPS Type of MAPS TN Removal TP Removal Littoral zone 10% 10% Floating Wetland Mats or Islands 20% - 40% 20% - 40% The applicant must provide independent scientific data based on Florida field monitoring to validate the nutrient load reduction of any MAPS proposed for use. 14.3 Littoral Zone Design Criteria Littoral zones are an optional component of wet detention systems. The littoral zone is that portion of a wet detention pond which is designed to contain rooted aquatic plants. The littoral area is usually provided by extending and gently sloping the sides of the pond down to a maximum depth of four feet below the normal water level or control elevation. One of the difficulties of successful littoral zone establishment and maintenance is the frequent changes in water level elevations within a wet detention pond. Experience has shown that long term survival of littoral zones is best when they are not located adjacent to private lots. Consequently, littoral zones typically are located near the outfall of a wet detention pond or along areas with common ownership. Littoral zones should also be considered in other areas of the pond that have depths suitable for successful plant growth such as a shallow shelf between the inflow sumps and the rest of the pond or on a shallow shelf in the middle Stormwater Quality Handbook 120 ** Draft 3-17-2010** 251 Attachment 4 of the pond, provided maintenance can be undertaken. If treatment credit is proposed for littoral zones placed adjacent to private lots, the applicant shall provide additional assurances through their legal operation and maintenance documents or through an easement that the littoral zone will be maintained as permitted. The littoral zone is established with native aquatic plants by planting and/or the placement of wetland soils containing seeds of native aquatic plants. A specific vegetation establishment plan must be prepared for the littoral zone. The plan must consider the water elevation fluctuations of the wet detention pond and the ability of specific plants to be established. A list of recommended native plant species suitable for Iittoral zone planting is included in Table 14-2. In addition, a layer of muck soil can be incorporated into the littoral area to promote the establishment of the wetland vegetation. When placing muck, special precautions must be taken to prevent erosion and turbidity problems in the pond and at its discharge point while vegetation is becoming established in the Iittoral zone. The following is a list of the design criteria for wet detention littoral zones: (a) The littoral zone shall be gently sloped (6H:1V .or flatter). At least 30 percent of the wet detention pond surface area shall consist of a littoral zone. The percentage of littoral zone is based on the ratio of vegetated littoral zone to surface area of the pond at the control elevation. (b) The bleeddown volume should not cause the pond level to rise more than 18 inches above the control elevation unless the applicant affirmatively demonstrates that the littoral zone vegetation can survive at greater depths. (c) Within 24 months of completion of the system, 80 percent coverage of the littoral zone area by suitable aquatic plants is required with no more than 10% consisting of exotic or nuisance species such as cattails or primrose willow. (d) Planting of the littoral zone is recommended to meet the 80% coverage requirement. As an alternative to planting, portions of the littoral zone may be established by placement of wetland top soils (at Ieast a four inch depth) containing a seed source of desirable native plants. When using this alternative, the littoral zone must be stabilized by mulching or other means and at least the portion of the littoral zone within 25 feet of the inlet and outlet structures must be planted. (e) In parts of Florida, the Channelled Apple Snail has been shown to decimate littoral zone vegetation so designers need to be aware of this problem and will be required to provide additional assurances that'damage done to the vegetation will be repaired within one month. (f) Replanting shall be required if the percentage of vegetative cover falls below the permitted level. The native vegetation within the littoral zone shall be maintained as part of the system's operation and maintenance plan. Undesirable species such as cattail and other exotic or nuisance plants shall be controlled and removed as needed. Stormwater Quality Handbook 121 ** Draft 3-17-2010** 252 Attachment 4 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA MEMORANDUM DEPARTMENTAL TO: Jason E. Brown, County Administrator THROUGH: Richard B. Szpyrka P.E., Public Works Director FROM: Alexis Peralta, Stormwater Educator & Fertilizer Enforcement SUBJECT: Egret Marsh Stormwater Park Tours DATE: March 13, 2019 DESCRIPTION In recent months Stormwater Staff has received great interest for tours at Egret Marsh Stormwater Park and Wildlife Sanctuary. Promoting one of our most innovative and effective projects not only shows the community the effort the County has put in to protecting our Indian River Lagoon and cleaning our local waterways but also encourages citizens to do their part in reducing pollution, protecting our stormwater runoff, and connecting more with nature. Since November 2018, many diverse groups (including the Clean Water Coalition, Lagoon wide IFAS Extension agents, and students through the Audubon Advocates Program) have gone out to enjoy all Egret Marsh has to offer, totaling at over 200 people. Each tour is limited to 15 people maximum for safety as well as to preserve the wildlife in their natural habitat; parking is also limited. Tours include a presentation of the algal turf scrubber, stormwater pollution education, and a walkthrough of the facility to view the wildlife living within the manmade wetlands. It is important to point out to guests that while Egret Marsh is filtering approximately 10 million gallons of stormwater a day, it is also protecting threatened listed species of birds that have come to the facility to nest and seek shelter, and this has become just as an important part to protecting our local environment. Florida's Department of Environmental Protection Aquatic Preserves has come out to record the Wood Stork sightings and agree that Egret Marsh has become much more valuable in its regard to protecting special wildlife species and preserving our wetland habitats. Tours are scheduled through the Stormwater Educator, are free of charge, and can last from 30 minutes to 90 minutes. For more information please contact Alexis Peralta at aperalta a(�ircgov.com or call 772-226-1565. FUNDING N/A RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends the promotion of tours available at Egret Marsh via the website, County Facebook pages, and the Government TV channel. ATTACHMENTS - Egret Marsh Tour Flyer - Egret Marsh Presentation for TV APPROVED AGENDA ITEM FOR MARCH 26, 2019 253 C:\Users\legistar\AppData\Local\Temp\BCL Technologies\easyPDF 8\@BCL@DOODDD6E\@BCL@DOODDD6E.doc An Algal Turf Scrubber Facility: Utilizing algae to filter and remove nutrients from the stormwater before reaching the Indian River Lagoon. MON 254 By Alexis Peralta, IRC Stormwater Educator 255 Reducing Stormwater Pollution • Algal Turf Scrubber- filtering nutrients, nitrogen and phosphorous, from approximately 10 million gallons of stormwater ,a day! • Personal- pollution Yprevention� learn simple ways we can all reduce pollution to the Indian River Lagoon 256 Nutrient Removals per Year: 13,200 lbs of Nitrogen 3,000 lbs of Phosphorous 257 Wildlife Sanctuary Offering a safe space for protected species and local wildlife! 258 Protected Species of Birds (Endangered, Threatened, and Special Concern) Juvenile Bald Eagle Snowy Egret Limpkin Protected Species of Birds (Endangered, Threatened, and Special Concern) ek• r t Roseate Spoonbill Little Blue Heron Osprey Sandhill Crane 260 Protected Species of Birds (Endangered, Threatened, and Special Concern) Groups hosted since 11/2018 • Audubon Advocates (5th grade afterschool program) • Pelican Island Audubon • Harmful Algal Bloom committee • Clean Water Coalition • IFAS Extension Agents • DEP Aquatic Preserves • Private group tours Totaling 226 people! 262 C©m £©h NJ�� 0Egtellilarsh SParke Xi 7295 4th ST Vero Beach FL 32968 (Closed to,thePuubflic) 1 :44 141 0: : : : 47••••4 1 :44 to 4 ,,, 1 k ,. . y , , , . i . . . . .,,,e i . . : ' ' , , i' , i ;'' , ' , f A An Algal Turf Scrubber Facility: Utilizing algae to filter and remove nutrients from the stormwater before reaching the Indian River Lagoon. 263 Departmental Agenda Item INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF UTILITY SERVICES Date: To: From: Subject: March 18, 2019 Jason E. Brown, County Administrator Vincent Burke, P.E., Director of Utility Services 286 +/- acre Purchase and Sale Agreement DESCRIPTIONS AND CONDITIONS: The West Regional Wastewater Treatment Facility (WRWWTF) is currently operating under Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) permit FL0041637. The existing plant is currently rated at 6.0 million gallons per day (MGD) annual average daily flow (AADF) permitted capacity. Adjacent to the WRWWTF is an existing 4.0 MGD AADF discharge from the plant to the created wetland. The Wetland Treatment System (WTS) is sized at 169 acres +/- with wetted area totaling approximately 135 +/- acres consisting of one deep settling pond, nine deep marsh flow through cells and three shallow marsh cells with a final storage outfall cell at the southwest corner of the site into the Lateral D canal near 1-95. Under, routine operating conditions, the Indian River County Department of Utility Services (IRCDUS) receives and treats the domestic wastewater using advanced treatment capabilities in order to separate the solids and further process the liquids and to then create reclaimed or reuse water. For most of the year, IRCDUS supplies multiple golf course locations this irrigation quality reuse water in lieu of those locations using groundwater. During times of heavy influent flows or when there is unusually high precipitation, the WRWWTF must still treat the wastes it receives and send the reclaimed water out to the system. As receiving ponds fill up, the only option is for the reclaimed water to be sent to the WTS where additional biological treatment occurs. When that scenario occurs, there is a possibility for permitted discharge to the Lateral D canal to start. During those intermittent discharges, the FDEP permit requires that certain parameters must be met for water quality and quantity, and that nutrient levels must be tracked. The current WRWWTF FDEP permit is issued under the federal program for the Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) National Point -Source Discharge Elimination System (NPDES). The Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) for the facility, in concert with the Basin Action Management Plan (BMAP) for this area, is structured in order to comply with the EPA's mandate and has very restrictive Waste Load Allocations (WLA) tied to the WRWWTF for Total Nitrogen (TN) and Total Phosphorus (TP). The FDEP permit and associated WLAs restrict the way IRCDUS is able to operate the WTS in attempting to stay at or below the WLA. Thus, IRCDUS is seeking alternative wet weather reclaimed water storage/disposal options for the WRWWTF. This need is especially critical since the County has been experiencing tremendous growth as well. IRCDUS has processed an average of 125 new meter installs each month for the past 18 months, and this growth 264 Page 1 of 5 C:\Users\legistar\AppData\Local\Temp\BCL Technologies\easyPDF 8\@BCL@700E00A8\@BCL@700E00A8.docx represents additional demand on the WWTFs the county operates. Therefore, as the County embarks on the Septic to Sewer initiative, the need to have a diverse reclaimed water system and storage alternative is ever more prudent. ANALYSIS: Currently, the WRWWTF has three options regarding its reclaimed water. First, it can send flows to its land application sites, which could include business parks, commercial parks, industrial parks and irrigation of golf courses or residential developments. Primarily, IRCDUS sends this water to golf courses through the unincorporated portions of the county. Secondarily, it can use Rapid Infiltration Basins (RIBS), but these RIBS are small in size and have limited volumetric capacity to handle daily flows from the WWTF's. Lastly, the flow is diverted to the WTS for further treatment. The South County WWTF, operating under FDEP permit FLA0101435, has most of its reuse water flow go towards the Indian River Club to be used for irrigation. However, there are times when their receiving ponds are full so the FDEP permit requires that the reclaimed water flow be redirected to the WRWWTF WTS. Due to the WLA constraints at the WRWWF, the potential for South WWTF flows, and the fact that there has been tremendous growth in the southern portion of the unincorporated area, there is a need to diversify the irrigation options and increase alternative storage and disposal sites should the golf courses be unable to take additional reclaimed water during heavy precipitation or reduced demand events. On January 22, 2019, the Indian River County Solid Waste and Disposal District (SWDD) Board rejected staff's recommendation to conduct a feasibility study for use of a deep injection well for disposal of the leachate, centrate and/or reclaimed water. Staff, as part of its ongoing research into disposal options, has reached out to an adjacent property owner for the potential to purchase 286 +/- acres of undeveloped land. Several years ago, an 80 -acre property just east of the WRWWTF was going through the approval process for development. At that time, there were concerns that a high-end subdivision (Stoneybrook) would have issues from its new residents being so close to a large wastewater facility. Indeed, after some residents began to complain about odor from the WRWWTF, the Board of County Commissioners (BCC) awarded a low bid to R.J. Sullivan in January 22, 2013, for $1.02M to build an anaerobic odor control solution. In 2007, it was known that the subject property to the south of the WRWWTF was to be developed into a 547 -unit Planned Development (PD) called Indian Springs. This was about the time the great recession occurred, and any such plans came to a halt. Now that the economy has picked up and the fact that there could be an interchange at the Oslo corridor in the next 5-7 years (pending successful design and financial approval of the project by FDOT), there is concern that additional homes could be built at this site. Not only would those homes represent more flows to the WRWWTF (approximately 137,000 gallons annual average daily flow (AADF)), but the additional residents may have concerns about the WWTF being next door to their homes. Thus, it is recommended that a visual and olfactory buffer be obtained to help insulate the WRWWTF from neighbors and to help with wet weather discharge options. Three Potential Uses It is anticipated that the proposed site could serve more than one purpose. This idea is subject to engineering vetting and additional research into the matter before a final judgement can be rendered as to the validity of such an idea. As part of a separate agenda item, there is a need to hire a professional engineering firm to assist IRCDUS with a feasibility study into the subject property in order to perform a 265 Page 2 of 5 C:\Users\legistar\AppData\Local\Temp\BCL Technologies\easyPDF 8\@BCL@700E00A8\@BCL@700E00A8.docx proper due diligence and to see if there are any "fatal flaws" from an economic, developmental, regulatory or hydraulic standpoint. First, as described previously, the pressures to increase the septic to sewer conversions to help the Indian River Lagoon, if successful, will create additional demand at the County's WWTFs. There is a need to have additional reclaimed water delivery options as well as land disposal options should wet weather or reduced demand events occur. Second, when IRCDUS is sending its reuse to the golf course sites, there could be an opportunity to draw in canal water from the Lateral D onto the site to keep the ponds hydrated and for nutrient reduction treatment. It is hoped that any such nutrient reduction from the canal system could be used as part of the County's innovative and holistic approach to TMDL reduction to assist with cleaning up the lagoon. Part of this research, subject to regulatory approval, is that any such reduction from the Lateral D canal system could be banked for potential future use should the WRWWTF ever exceed its WLA limits or as another innovative "scrubber" system that the County has that is instrumental as part of its aggressive TMDL removal efforts. Third, there could be a possibility for a combination water storage/ TMDL reduction site associated with a public park. According to Community Development, a park with walking trail facilities would be allowed under the site land use (L-1 low density Residential for the property East of 1-95, AG -2 Agricultural for the 44 -acre +/- piece West of 1-95) and zoning (RS -3 Residential Single -Family East of 1-95, A-2 Agricultural West of 1-95). Note that the triangular piece, west of 1-95 and accessible from 4th Street. under 1-95, is outside the Urban Service Area (USA). There also appears to be some existing low-lying areas and/or wetlands on the rectangular piece east of 1-95. The proposed project use (Limited Utility) would be the same category as the Osprey Acres Floway and Nature Preserve Project and would go through the special exemption and site plan process like the Osprey Acres. As noted in the Indian River County Comprehensive Plan, Recreation and Open Space Element, the following policies may be applicable: Policy 1.5 By2018, the county shall complete a needs analysis of its recreation services. This analysis will include an assessment of the type of parks and facilities needed in Indian River County, the quantity of facilities needed, the location where those facilities are needed, the current use of facilities, and a comparison of county needs to national standards for recreation services, and unique local conditions relevant to recreation services. Policy 1.9 By 2018, the Recreation Division shall evaluate new funding options, including privatization and partnerships. Policy 1.12 The county shall continue to charge park and recreation impact fees to fund a portion of the park system's capital budget needs. Policy 2.3 Avenue. The county shall give Parkland acquisition priority to the area south of SR 60, west of 43rd 266 Page 3 of 5 C:\Users\legistar\AppData\Local\Temp\BCL Technologies\easyPDF 8\@BCL@700E00A8\@BCL@700E00A8.docx As noted in the Indian River County Comprehensive Plan, Sanitary Sewer Sub -Element, the following policy is applicable: Policy 5.2 Proposed capital improvement projects shall be evaluated and ranked according to the following three priority level guidelines: • Level One - whether the project is needed to protect public health and safety, to fulfill the county's legal commitment to provide facilities and services, or to preserve or achieve full use of existing facilities. • Level Two - whether the project increases efficiency of use of existing facilities, prevents or reduces future improvement costs; provides service to developed areas lacking full service or promotes in -fill development. • Level Three - whether the project represents a logical extension of facilities and services within the urban service area. With respect to any potential multi -use project, the County's Park and Conservation Resources, along with the Recreation Division, could have an opportunity to work with Public Works and IRCDUS for Public Park space, Nutrient reduction and wet weather water storage. Access to the site could be from 4th Street and would be advantageous since that road serves current and future development on both sides of 1-95. Trails, common trailhead parking and restroom facilities, picnic and multi-purpose fields could be potential uses for a site that could encompass 10 acres +/- similar in size to the existing Charles Park located in South Vero. A recent appraisal by Armfield Wagner #44836 for a 306.40 -acre agricultural parcel located along the south side of 4th Street east of 82"d Avenue was conducted in February of 2018. The 306 -acre property is outside of the Urban Service Area (USA). At that time, the opinion of market value for the fee simple property using the Sales Comparison Approach valued the property at $4,300,000 ($14,000/acre). This was the initial basis of discussion with the Premier property representatives in 2018. Upon further deliberations, staff and the Premier representative reached a consensus for a mutually agreed upon price for the 286 +/- acre conglomerate of three parcels (2 of which are inside the USA and 1 is outside the USA). The Purchase and Sale agreement is presented to the BCC for consideration and approval, subject to a 90 - day due diligence investigation. Such research will be performed by a professional engineering firm providing services to IRCDUS as part of the 2018 Continuing Contract Agreement for Professional Services. It is staff's intent to bring back a summary of finding in June 2019, prior to the expiration of the 90 -day due diligence time period. Should the BCC, at that time, choose not to proceed, they would vote to sign the Exhibit B portion of the agreement terminating the sale process. Should the BCC continue to move forward with the purchase, the 90 -day time period would expire, and the closing would happen within 30 days thereafter. FUNDING: There are three funding sources anticipated for the purchase of the subject properties. 1. Optional Sales Tax — 20% of optional sales tax monies are set aside for projects affiliated with the Indian River Lagoon initiative - $1.8 million is budgeted the County's CIE in Fiscal Year 20/21 for a TM DL/Utility/Effluent Storage project. 267 Page 4 of 5 C:\Users\legistar\AppData\Local\Temp\BCL Technologies\easyPDF 8\@BCL@700E00A8\@BCL@700E00A8.docx 2. Park impact fees are available for a western corridor park - $1 million is budgeted in the County's CIE in Fiscal Year 22/23. 3. Utility Impact Fees — Growth has caused the need for additional sites to dispose of or "park" reclaimed water. $1.8 million is budgeted the County's CIE in Fiscal Year 20/21 for a TMDL/Utility/ Effluent Storage project. Should the BCC approve the proposed land purchase, a budget amendment will be necessary to allocate funding for the project into the current fiscal year. Note that there could be additional investment needed to further design and construct the site. Those costs are not known at this time and the funding required for any future potentialproject are not part of this agenda item and would be brought back to the BCC for approval at a future date. Description Account Number Percent Amount Optional Sales tax 31524338-066110-19009 45% $2,160,180.00 Park Impact Fees 10321072-066110-19009 10% $ 480,040.00 Utility Impact Fees 472-169000-19009 45% $2,160,180.00 Total 100% $4,800,400.00 RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners authorize the Chairman to sign the purchase and sale agreement for the Premier Citrus LLC properties for $4,800,400.00. ATTACHMENT(s): 1. Purchase and Sale Agreement 268 Page 5 of 5 C:\Users\legistar\AppData\Local\Temp\BCL Technologies\easyPDF 8\@BCL@700E00A8\@BCL@700E00A8.docx AGREEMENT TO PURCHASE AND SELL REAL ESTATE THIS AGREEMENT TO PURCHASE AND SELL REAL ESTATE ("Agreement") is made and entered into as of the day of , 2019, by and between Indian River County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida ("County"), whose address is 1801 27th Street, Vero Beach, FL 32960 and Premier Citrus, LLC, a Florida Limited Liability company, whose address is 625 66th Avenue SW Vero Beach, FL 32968 ("Sellers"), who agree as follows: 1. Agreement to Purchase and Sell. The Seller hereby agrees to sell to the County, and the County hereby agrees to purchase from Seller, upon the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement, three parcels of real property totaling approximately 306.40 acres, generally described as follows: • Indian Springs Parcel is approximately 204.96 acres in size • Seminole Acres Parcel is approximately 42.64 acres in size • Ranch Road Parcel approximately 38.54 acres in size The three contiguous parcels form a rectangle being bordered by 82nd Avenue to the east, 4th Street to the north, 90th Avenue to the west and 1St Street SW to the south, County of Indian River, State of Florida more specifically described on composite Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated by reference herein and all improvements thereon, together with all easements, rights and uses now or hereafter belonging thereto (collectively, the "Property"). County is required to purchase, and close on, all three properties on the same closing date defined herein, unless separate closing dates are agreed upon by the parties in writing. 2. Purchase Price, Effective Date. The purchase price (the "Purchase Price") for the Property shall -be as follows: • Three Million,. Five Hundred Eight Six Thousand, Eight Hundred Dollars ($3,586,800.00) for the Indian Springs parcel based on a per acre price of $17,500 per acre. • Five hundred ninety six thousand nine hundred sixty dollars ($596,960.00) for the Seminole Acres parcel based on a per acre price of $14,000 per acre. • Five Hundred Ninety Six Thousand Nine Hundred and Sixty Dollars ($596,960.00) for the Ranch Road parcel based on a per acre price of $16,000 per acre. For a total of four million eight hundred thousand four hundred dollars ($4,800,400.00). The Purchase Price shall be paid on the Closing Date. The Purchase Price shall be final, and shall not be readjusted for any changes in the final surveyed acreage of the Property. The Effective Date of this Agreement shall be the date upon which the County shall have 269 approved the execution of this Agreement, by approval by the Indian River County Board of County Commissioners at a formal meeting of such Board. 3. Contingencies. This Agreement shall be contingent upon approval by the Indian River County Board of County Commissioners at a formal meeting of the Board. 3.1 This Agreement shall also be contingent upon receipt by the County of satisfactory soil tests, surveys, wildlife studies and reports as to the suitability of the Property to be used for water retention, storage and/or nutrient treatment purposes. It shall also be contingent on receipt of a Phase I environmental assessment. It shall be the sole discretion and determination of the County as/to •.the suitability of the Property for water retention, storage and/or nutrient treatment puposes. The"County shall have ninety (90) days from the Effective Date to make the suitability determination. If the County determines that the Property is not suitable for any of the above retention purposes, it shall inform the Seller in writing and this Agreement shall become null and,void. See Exhibit "B" attached and incorporated by reference herein. 4. Title. Seller shall convey marketable title to'the Property by warranty deed free of claims, liens, easements and encumbrances of record or known to Seller; but subject to property taxes for the year of Closing and covenants, restrictions and public utility easements of record provided (a) there exists at Closing no violation of any of the foregoing; and (b) none of the foregoing prevents County's intended use and development of the Property ("Permitted Exceptions"). , 4.1 County may order an Ownership and Encumbrance Report or Title Insurance Commitment with respect to the Property. County shall within thirty (30) days following the Effective Date of this Agreement deliver written notice to Seller of title defects. Title shall be deemed acceptable to County if (a) County fails to deliver notice of defects within the time specified, or (b) County delivers notice and Seller cures the defects within thirty (30) days from receipt of notice from County of title defects ("Curative Period"). Seller shall use best efforts to cure the defects within the Curative Period and if the title defects are not cured within the curative Period, County shall have thirty (30) days from the end of the Curative Period to elect, by written notice to Seller, to: (i) terminate this Agreement, whereupon this Agreement shall be of no further force and effect; (ii) extend the Curative Period for up to an additional 90 days; or (iii) accept title subject to existing defects and proceed to closing. 5. Representations of the Seller. 5.1 Seller is indefeasibly seized of marketable, fee simple title to the Property, and is the sole owner of and has good right, title, and authority to convey and transfer the Property which is the subject matter of this Agreement, free and clear of all liens and encumbrances. 5.2 From and after the Effective Date of this Agreement, Seller shall take no action which would impair or otherwise affect title to any portion of the Property, and shall record no documents in the Public Records which would affect title to the Property, without the prior written consent of the County. 5.3 There are no existing or pending special assessments affecting the Property, which are or may be assessed by any governmental authority, water or sewer authority, school district, drainage district or any other special taxing district. 5.4 Seller shall permit the County or its agents to access the property upon reasonable notice to perform the necessary testing and examinations in order to determine the suitability of the Property for the County's purposes. Following the completion of the testing and examination, the Property shall be returned to its original condition, reasonable wear and tear excepted. 5.5 Seller does not make any warranties or.represeritations regarding the condition of the property or its suitability for County's specific purpose. It is further acknowledged by Seller and County that the property is in as -is condition, and Seller shall not be required to repair or remediate any unfavorable conditions found upon the property, other than title defects as specified further in this Section 5. 6. Default. 6.1 In the event the County shall fail to perform any of its obligations hereunder, the Seller shall, at its sole option, be entitled to: (i) terminate this Agreement by written notice delivered to the County at or prior to the Closing Date and thereupon neither the Seller nor any other person or party shall have any claim for specific performance, damages, or otherwise against the County; or (ii) waive the County's default and proceed to Closing. 6.2 In the event the Seller shall fail to perform any of its obligations hereunder, the County shall, at its sole option, be entitled to: (i) terminate this Agreement by written notice delivered to the Seller at or prior to the Closing Date and thereupon neither the County nor any other person or'party shall have any claim for specific performance, damages or otherwise against the Seller; or (ii) obtain specific performance of the terms and conditions hereof; or (iii) waive the Seller's default and proceed to Closing: 7. Closing. 7.1 The closing of the transaction contemplated herein ("Closing" and "Closing Date") shall take place within 90 days following the Effective Date of this Agreement. The parties agree that the Closing shall be as follows: (a) The Seller shall execute and deliver to the County a warranty deed conveying 271 marketable title to the Property, free and clear of all liens and encumbrances and in the condition required by paragraphs 3 and 4. (b) The Seller shall have removed all of its personal property and equipment from the Property and Seller shall deliver possession of the Property to County vacant and in the same or better condition that existed at the Effective Date hereof. (c) If Seller is obligated to discharge any encumbrances at or prior to Closing and fails to do so, County may use a portion of Purchase Price funds to satisfy the encumbrances. (d) If the Seller is a non-resident alien or foreign entity, Seller shall deliver to the County an affidavit, in a form acceptable to the County, certifying thafthe Seller and any interest holders are not subject to tax under the Foreign Investment and Real Property Tax Act of 1980. (e) The Seller and the County shall each deliver to the other such other documents or instruments as may reasonably be required to Close this transaction. ` 7.2 Taxes. All taxes and special.assessments which are a lien upon the property on or prior to the Closing Date (except current taxes which are'not yet due and payable) shall be paid by the Seller. 8. Closing Costs: Expenses. County or its Agent, shall be responsible for preparation of all Closing documents. 8.1 County shall pay the following expenses at Closing: 8.1.1 The cost of recording the warranty deed and any release or satisfaction obtained by Seller pursuant to this Agreement. 8.1.2 Documentary Stamps required to be affixed to the warranty deed. 8.1.3 All costs and premiums for the owner's marketability title insurance commitment and policy, if any. 8.2 Seller shall pay the following expenses at or prior to Closing: 8.2.1 All costs necessary to cure title defect(s) or encumbrances, other than the Permitted Exceptions, and to satisfy or release of record all existing mortgages, liens or encumbrances upon the Property. 8.2.2 Pro -rated property taxes, if any. 272 8.2.3 Two Percent (2%) Commission on the sales price, payable to Grow Florida Land, LLC. 9. Miscellaneous. 9.1 Controlling Law. This Agreement shall be construed and enforced in accordance with the laws of the State of Florida. Venue shall be in Indian River County for all state court matters, and in the Southern District of Florida for all federal court matters. 9.2 Entire Agreement. This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement between the parties with respect to this transaction and supersedes -all prior agreements, written or oral, between the Seller and the County relating to the subject matter hereof. Any modification or amendment to this Agreement shall be effective only if in writing and executed by each of the parties. 9.3 Assignment and Binding Effect. Neither County nor Seller may assign its rights and obligations under this Agreement without the prior. written consent of the other party. The terms hereof shall be binding upon and shall inure to the benefit of the parties hereto and their successors and assigns. 9.4 Notices. Any notice shall be deemed duly served if personally served or if mailed by certified mail, return receipt requested, or if sent via "overnight" courier service or facsimile transmission, as follows: If to Seller: Premier Citrus, LLC 625 66th Avenue,SW Vero Beach, FL 32968 With Copy To: Beckett C. Horner, Esq. 1515 Indian River Blvd., Suite A-220 Vero Beach, FL 32960 If to County: • Iridian River County 1801 27th Street Vero Beach, FL 32960 Attn: Vincent Burke, Utilities Director Either party may change the information above by giving written notice of such change as provided in this paragraph. 9.5 Survival and Benefit. Except as otherwise expressly provided herein, each agreement, representation or warranty made in this Agreement by or on behalf of either party, or in any instruments delivered pursuant hereto or in connection herewith, shall survive the Closing Date and the consummation of the transaction provided for herein. 273 The covenants, agreements and undertakings of each of the parties hereto are made solely for the benefit of, and may be relied on only by the other party hereto, its successors and assigns, and are not made for the benefit of, nor may they be relied upon, by any other person whatsoever. 9.6 Attorney's Fees and Costs. In any claim or controversy arising out of or relating to this Agreement, each party shall bear its own attorney's fees, costs, and expenses. 9.7. Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in two or more counterparts, each one of which shall constitute an original. 9.8 Beneficial Interest Disclosure: In the event Seller is a partnership, limited partnership, corporation, trust, or any form of representative. capacity whatsoever for others, Seller shall provide a fully completed, executed, and sworn beneficial interest disclosure statement in the form attached to this Agreement as an 'exhibit that complies with all of the provisions of Florida Statutes.Section 286.23 prior to approval of this Agreement by the County. However, pursuant to Florida Statutes Section 286.23 (3) (a), the beneficial interest in any entity registered with the Federal Securities and Exchange Commission, or registered pursuant to Chapter 517, Florida Statutes, whose interest is for sale to the general public, is exempt from disclosure; and, where the Seller is a non-public entity, that Seller is not required to disclose persons or entities holding less than five (5%) percent of the beneficial interest in Seller. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed this Agreement as of the date first set forth above. PREMIER CITRUS, LLC INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA a Florida Limited Liability company BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS By: By: Name: Title: Bob Solari, Chairman Date Signed: Date Approved: Witnessed by: Attest: Jeffrey R. Smith, Clerk of Court And Comptroller By 274 Printed Name: Deputy Clerk Witnessed by: Printed Name: Approved for BCC Agenda Jason E. Brown County Administrator Approved as to form And legal sufficiency. William K. DeBraal Deputy County Attorney 275 EXHIBIT A LEGAL DISCRIPTION 276 EXHIBIT B TERMINATION NOTICE AND AGREEMENT Indian River County ("County") hereby executes this Termination Notice and Agreement (this "Notice of Termination") as of this day of , 2019 (the "Termination Effective Date"). RECITALS A. County and Premier Citrus LLC, a Florida limited liability company ("Sellers") entered into a certain Agreement to Purchase and Sell Real Estate dated , 2019 (the "Agreement") pursuant to which' Seller agreed to sell ,and County agreed to purchase the Property (as such term is defined in the Agreement). B. Pursuant to this Notice of Termination, County desires to terminate the Agreement in accordance with the terms thereof.. NOW, THEREFORE, pursuant to this Notice of Termination and in accordance with the terms of the Agreement, County hereby notifies Seller and agrees as follows: 1. As of the Termination Effective Date, the Agreement is terminated and of no further force and effect. Neither County nor Seller shall have any further rights or obligations thereunder; provided, however, and notwithstanding the foregoing, County acknowledges and agrees that County shall remain obligated with respect to any and all obligations that by the express terms of the Agreement are intended to survive termination of the Agreement. 2. County warrants and represents that it has previously or simultaneously herewith delivered to Seller all Due Diligence Reports (as such term is defined in the Agreement). 3. County hereby acknowledges and agrees that it has no right, title, claim or interest in and to the Property. 4. County warrants and represents that to the extent County undertook any physical testing of the Property which modified the physical condition of the Property, County has fully 277 restored the Property to its original condition. IN WITNESS WHEROF, County has caused this Notice of Termination to be executed as of the Termination Effective Date. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA BY: Bob Solari, Chairman BCC Approved: Approved: By: Jason Brown, County Administrator Attest: Jeffrey R. Smith, Clerk of Court and Comptroller By: Deputy Clerk Approved as to form and legal sufficiency William K. Debraal ‘SZ:7 Deputy County Attorney 278 s'Prope Stoney BroOk'Fa'ims - 80 ac ,1i 'aunils • 15 unsolo inote Acs. - 44ac 12TH S (OS D L � &!%z p * Q\ \& 2 ri .y:■ 5 5` §k �- ■�dPDTNDy■ \ « PN* OUNb Amu Departmental Item INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF UTILITY SERVICES Date: March 14, 2019 To: Jason E. Brown, County Administrator From: Vincent Burke, P.E., Director of Utility Services Prepared By: Arjuna Weragoda, P.E., Capital Projects Manager Subject: Due Diligence and Project Review West Regional WWTF Reclaimed Water Storage, Tetra Tech Work Order No. 2 DESCRIPTIONS AND CONDITIONS: Indian River County has experienced significant growth in the last five years and has also undertaken a robust septic to sewer conversion program. The Indian River County wastewater collection and treatment system covers a large geographical area that is comprised of six sewer service areas: North Regional, Sea Oaks, Central Regional (Gifford), West Regional, Blue Cypress and South Regional. It is important to note that currently both Sea Oaks and the North Regional areas pump raw wastewater to the Central Regional Wastewater Treatment Facility (WWTF) for treatment. The treated effluent is currently used for irrigation, discharged to the wetlands for further treatment or discharged to Rapid Infiltration Basins (RIBs). The County is in need of additional treated effluent storage or disposal options consisting of either (or a combination of) a wetland treatment system, RIBs, reservoir storage, above ground storage tanks, spray fields or Aquifer Storage and Recovery (ASR) wells, especially during wet weather periods. Current Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) allocations to surface waters at the West Regional WWTF have restricted the Indian River County Department of Utility Services (IRCDUS) in operating the existing wetland system to its design limitations, and therefore, other alternative disposal methods must be evaluated. ANALYSIS: The previous item on the agenda was for the Indian River County Board of County Commissioners (BCC) to authorize the agreement to purchase undeveloped land located at the southwest corner of 82"d Avenue and 4th Street. To assist the County in identifying issues associated with the purchase of the property, Tetra Tech, as part of their 2018 Continuing Contract Agreement for Professional Services (CCNA), provided a scope of work to perform this due diligence investigation. Tetra Tech is familiar with this type of analysis as they have performed similar evaluations in the past. The attached Tetra Tech Work Order No. 2 is broken down into seven tasks that will research/perform the following: 1) General Property, Land Use, Permitting, and Zoning Review, 2) Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessment (ESA), 3) Ecological Review, 4) Geotechnical Analysis, 5) Stormwater Review, 6) Summary Report, and 7) Conceptual Design The intent is to invest in the necessary research to fully understand the issues associated before purchasing the property and its intended use due to the complexity of such a project. In addition, staff C:\Users\legistar\AppData\Local\Temp\BCL Technologies\easyPDF 8\@BCL@200E6002\@BCL@200E6002.docx 279 Departmental Item thought it would be helpful to identify, as best as possible, potential future investments associated with storage of reclaimed/canal water system so that the BCC can make an educated decision whether to pursue the subject property purchase now knowing that sizeable future investments may be required. Such costs are subject to environmental, economic and logistical issues that will be identified in the due diligence investigation. The purchase agreement has a due diligence ending date of June 24, 2019. In accordance with the contract, the County has until 5:00 pm on Monday, June 24, 2019, to notify the seller if the purchase agreement is to be terminated. Should the County wish to purchase the land after it has performed its due diligence investigation, the closing date will be set immediately after the 90 -day due diligence expires. Staff anticipates working with Tetra Tech to complete the tasks associated in the Work Order in order to bring back an update to the BCC at the June 18, 2019, meeting so staff can report on the summary of findings. The BCC can then choose to approve or cancel the purchase at that time. The total negotiated cost to perform the engineering services for the due diligence investigation and project review in Tetra Tech's Work Order No. 2 is $55,480.00. FUNDING: Funds for the due diligence investigation are derived from Other Professional Services account in the operating fund. Operating fund revenues are generated from water and sewer sales. Description Account Number Amount Other Professional Services 471-23536-033190 $55,480.00 RECOMMENDATION: Staff requests that the Board of County Commissioners authorize the Chairman to sign the Tetra Tech CCNA-2018 Work Order No. 2 for the Due Diligence and Project Review of West Regional WWTF Reclaimed Water Storage. ATTACHMENT(s): 1. Tetra Tech CCNA-2018 Work Order No.2: Due Diligence and Project Review West Regional WWTF Reclaimed Water Storage (8 Pages) C:\Users\legista r\AppData\Local\Temp\BCL Technologies\easyPDF 8\@BCL@200E6002\@BCL@200E6002.docx 280 CCNA2018 WORK ORDER 02 West Regional WWTF Reclaimed Water Storage This Work Order Number 02 is entered into as of this 26th day of March, 2019, pursuant to that certain Continuing Consulting Engineering Services, Agreement for Professional Services entered into as of this 17th day of April, 2018 (collectively referred to as the "Agreement"), by and between INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Florida ("COUNTY") and Tetra Tech, Inc. ("Consultant"). The COUNTY has selected the Consultant to perform the professional services set forth on Exhibit A (Scope of Work), attached to this Work Order and made part hereof by this reference. The professional services will be performed by the Consultant for the fee schedule set forth in Exhibit B (Fee Schedule), attached to this Work Order and made a part hereof by this reference. The Consultant will perform the professional services within the timeframe more particularly set forth in Exhibit C (Time Schedule), attached to this Work Order and made a part hereof by this reference all in accordance with the terms and provisions set forth in the Agreement. Pursuant to paragraph 1.4 of the Agreement, nothing contained in any Work Order shall conflict with the terms of the Agreement and the terms of the Agreement shall be deemed to be incorporated in each individual Work Order as if fully set forth herein. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Work Order as of the date first written above. CONSULTANT: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY By: i.,74---A-(--j,7By: Matthew Shelton , Chairman Print Name: Title: Project Manager BCC Approved Date: Attest: Jeffrey R. Smith, Clerk of Court and Comptroller By: Approved: Approved as to form and legal sufficiency: Deputy Clerk Jason E. Brown, County Administrator Dylan T. Reingold, County Attorney 281 UTETRA TECH March 14, 2019 Arjuna Weragoda, P.E. Indian River County Department of Utility Services 1801 27th Street, Vero Beach 32960-3388 Email: aweragoda(ircaov..com Subject: Proposal to Indian River County for Due Diligence and Project Review West Regional WWTF Reclaimed Water Storage Dear Mr. Weragoda: Tetra Tech, Inc. (Tetra Tech) is pleased to provide Indian River County with this Scope of Work for services to provide due diligence services to assess a.potential property purchase and construction of a reclaimed water storage area on a parcel located immediately to the south of the West Regional Waste Water Treatment Facility (WWTF). BACKGROUND Indian River County needs additional storage of reuse water from the West Regional WWTF during the rainy season when the necessity for reuse water is limited. The West Regional WWTF is sized for a treatment capacity of 6 million gallons per day (MGD). The plant is currently operating at approximately 2 MGD but can only discharge approximately 0.4 MGD or exceed the load allocations into the relief canal. The remainder of the treated water is sent back to the community for reuse. The goal of the proposed reclaimed water storage will be to provide sufficient capacity to store water during the wet season and supply reuse water in the dry season and achieve a zero discharge to the relief canal. The county has identified an approximately 250 -acre parcel immediately to the south of the West Regional WWTF as a potential site for the reclaimed water storage. It is zoned RS -3 and is a citrus grove. The County contacted Tetra Tech to complete due diligence required to assess this potential project, zoning and permitting issues associated with project, geotechnical conditions, limitations from Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) or other agencies, and other business and environmental risks associated with the purchase of the proposed parcel. Tetra Tech, lnc. 1 1 Riverside Drive. Sake 204. Cocoa. FL 32922 Te; 321.636.6.470 Fax 321.636.6473 wwW.,etr. cCli com 282 Mr. Arjuna Weragoda, P.E March 14, 2019 Page 2 SCOPE OF WORK Task 1— General Property, Land Use, Permitting, and Zoning Review - $6,046 An overall assessment of site suitability based on current State of Florida waste water treatment regulations and other potential limitations will be completed. We will consider the following with our due diligence: Existing permits or other encumbrances based on a review of Florida Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) Oculus and St. Johns River Water Management District (SJRWMD) records; Evaluation of surrounding land uses and restrictions provided by those uses (specifically the air strip to the south); Hydrologic survey; Permitted potable wells within a one -mile radius; Proximity to on and off-site water bodies, including wetlands; Proximity to airports; Proximity to power lines; Setbacks; County zoning and determination if rezoning is required; Determination if mining permit is required; Off-site improvement requirements; Summary of applicable permits, permit fees, and potential limitations associated with each permit as well as anticipated timeframe needed to obtain each permit; We assume that traffic impacts and availability of utilities are not an issue for the site. Task 2 — Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) - $4,031 The Phase I ESA identifies the potential for existing environmental contamination from a review of present and historical land uses. The Phase I ESA is a due diligence document to ensure that those undertaking or investing in a project are fully aware of environmental contamination issues as well as the associated liability. Tetra Tech will complete a historical and regulatory records review of the Site and adjacent properties. To facilitate the regulatory records review, a database review report will be procured from Environmental Data Resources, Inc. (EDR). Historical records to be reviewed include, but are not limited to, Sanborn Maps, city directories, Flood Insurance Rate Maps, water well records, and U.S. Geological Survey 7.5 -minute topographic quads. Tetra Tech will complete the following ESA Field activities at the subject site: • Reconnaissance of the Site and adjoining properties and selected properties identified during the database review, where appropriate per ASTM E1527-13; • Site interviews of key personnel; TETRA TECH 283 Mr. Arjuna Weragoda, P.E March 14, 2019 Page 3 • Reviews of federal, state, local and tribal (if applicable) records as defined in ASTM E1527-13; • Incorporate All Appropriate Inquiries components which include a review of market value prices for the property adjacent properties and an environmental liens search as defined by E1527-13; • Identify areas on site that will require analytical sampling assessment through records search and site visit. Based on the findings of the historical records review and site reconnaissance, Tetra Tech will prepare an ASTM Phase I ESA Report for the Site. The report will be prepared in accordance to ASTM E1527-13. Task 3 — Ecological Review (Limited) - $3,562 For this task we propose a field and desktop due diligence effort to make an initial assessment on the potential development constraints including wetlands, threatened & endangered species, and potential mitigation options for impacts to natural resources. The following scope will detail the components included with each of the three fatal flaw review topics provided, including Wetlands Habitat Classification and Quality, Threatened and Endangered Species habitat evaluation, and Federal Emergency Management Agency's flood zone information. The desktop investigation will include National Wetlands Inventory (NWI) wetlands, U.S. Department of Agriculture -Natural Resources Conservation Service (USDA-NRCS) soils, Florida Land Use, Cover, and Forms Classification System (FLUCFCS) mapping of on-site land uses, Florida Fish & Wildlife Conservation Commission (FFWCC) listed species habitats and associated data, U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service (USFWS) Consultation Areas, and any other applicable publicly available resources with potential to effect. Additionally, Tetra Tech will provide the development constraints and potential permitting related to threatened and endangered species for which the Project site may provide suitable habitat. Task 4 — Geotechnical Analysis - $28,028 A geotechnical analysis is required to determine suitability of the 250 -acre property to support the reclaimed water storage. For this evaluation, borings should be focused on the proposed berm area. Since the berm locations have not been designated, we recommend 4 borings along a north -south transect, and 4 borings along an east -west transect (8 borings total) be completed to a depth of approximately 60 feet or to the bedrock, using standard penetration test. Tetra Tech's geologist will provide drilling oversight and will prepare detailed boring logs of each location. Percolation tests will also be completed on site in six locations. Additional borings and testing should be completed once the conceptual design is better defined. Three Shelby Tube samples will be collected, in addition to approximately 10 bagged samples for geotechnical laboratory testing. Testing will include sieve/gradation, atterberg, hydraulic conductivity, and soil strength. Specific testing will be determined based on samples recovered. Data obtained from the laboratory testing will be used to prepare a preliminary determination of soil bearing capacity and settlement (using an assumed berm height with 4:1 slopes). Since the site is an active citrus grove, it is assumed that soil samples will be required to assess the potential for contamination from past site activities. Based on this assumption, surface soil TETRA TECH 284 Mr. Arjuna Weragoda, P.E March 14, 2019 Page 4 samples will be collected from four areas and analyzed for: pesticides, herbicides, and arsenic. If maintenance and/or fuel storage areas or other hazardous materials use or storage are identified, additional sampling and analysis may be required. Task 5 - Stormwater Review -$8,133 A desktop review of the drainage and flood conditions of the site will be completed to coordinate the potential constructability of the potential reclaimed water storage area. We note that the establishment of a flood elevation, if not available from FEMA, is beyond the scope of this project. We will estimate the floodplain compensation that would be required if the land were to be developed. The following documents will be reviewed as part of this evaluation: ERPs for the property comprising the 250 -acre parcel, if available; Topographic survey for the property comprising the 250 -acre parcel, if available; Conservations easements for the property comprising the 250 -acre parcel, if available; Readily available USDA soil information; Readily available USGS topographic information to determine overall drainage patterns; Local stormwater regulations; and Results of geotechnical analysis. Task 6 - Summary Report - $5,680 A summary report of all findings will be prepared for this due diligence effort, and will include: General Property, Land Use, Permitting, and Zoning Review; Results of the Phase I ESA (provided as a separate Appendix); Results of the Geotechnical Analysis; Results of the Ecological Review: • Identification of threatened and endangered species which have potential to inhabit the site and permitting action necessary to mitigate in the event of development of the site; • Results of the desktop mapping analysis; and • Other potential development constraints raised during the investigation including permitting issues. General summary and conclusion of design and permitting limitations anticipated for the site. Tetra Tech will provide general order of magnitude costs for the design, permitting and construction of the proposed reclaimed water storage facility. The estimates will be made without detailed engineering data and subsequently will have a wide accuracy range. Please note that this level of cost estimating is intended for project screening, concept evaluation and alternative scheme analysis. TETRA TECH 285 Mr. Arjuna Weragoda, P.E March 14, 2019 Page 5 Task 7 (future scope) — Conceptual Design Based, on the assessment competed above, an assumed area available for development will be established, maximum berm height will also be established, resulting in and assumed maximum reclaimed water storage capacity. Design criteria will be provided by IRC to compete the conceptual design for the reclaimed water storage. Additional scope will be prepared for this task upon completion of the above summary. The conceptual design will also include a probable cost estimate for the design, permitting and construction of the conceptual water storage facility. PROJECT SCHEDULE The approximate duration noted for each task is based on our current understanding and best estimates of time required to perform the basic services and may be subject to change upon agreement between Indian River County and Tetra Tech. Task Timeline Notice to Proceed (NTP) March 26, 2019 Draft Summary Report and Skype Meeting with the County June 4, 2019 County Comments on Draft Summary Report to Tetra Tech June 8, 2019 Final Summary Report to the County June 12, 2019 ASSUMPTIONS Tetra Tech's scope of services and project costs were developed with the following assumptions: • Tetra Tech will review available data provided by Indian River County. • Surveying services are not included. • Ecological and geotechnical data for this stage of the project is incomplete for the final design and permitting. Additional ecological and geotechnical investigation will be required to complete the final design. • A limited Phase II ESA scope of work (soil sampling and analysis) is provided based on known site conditions to reduce mobilization costs and project timeline; however, additional Phase II ESA activities may be required and proposed based on Phase I ESA findings. • Tetra Tech assumes IRC will provide reasonable access to the site for drilling activities and Phase I ESA site walk. • Design criteria will be provided by IRC to complete the conceptual design for the reclaimed water storage facility. Unless otherwise indicated, the proposed reclaimed water storage facility will consist of a lined, ring -dike system. • IRC will provide sufficient information in order to size the proposed reclaimed water storage facility. TETRA TECH 286 Mr. Arjuna Weragoda, P.E March 14, 2019 Page 6 o It is assumed that a detailed design analysis and subsequent value engineering will occur during the design phase and a more detailed cost estimate will be completed at that time. PROJECT COST The estimated costs are based on our current understanding of the project requirements and best estimates of level of effort required to perform the basic services and may be subject to change upon agreement between Indian River County and Tetra Tech. The estimated project costs are shown in the attached Table 1. This project would be provided as lump sum per task not to exceed $55,480. Indian River County will be invoiced each month for services rendered during the previous calendar month based on percent complete. Tetra Tech shall be paid for all invoices within 30 days of an approved submittal. Tetra Tech looks forward to working with you on this project. We are available to discuss our approach with you in detail at your convenience. Should you have any questions regarding this proposal, please contact me at (321) 636-6470. Sincerely, ew D. Shelton Project Manager Cc: Brian Watson, P.E., Tetra Tech TETRA TECH 287 TABLE 1 - Cost Estimate - Indian River County West Regional WWTF Reclaimed Water Storage Personnel Classification Hourly Rate Task 1. General Property, Land Use, Permitting, and Zoning Review Task 2. Phase 1 ESA Task 3. Ecological Review Task 4. Geotechnical Analysis Task 5 Stormwater Review Task 6. Summary Report Subtotal Hours Total Hours Cost Hours Cost Hours Cost Hours Cost Hours Cost Hours Cost ProjcctManagcr 5159 5 5796 10 $1,591 2 5318 16 52,546 8 51,273 10 51,591 51 58,115 Engineer IV $137 20 52,740 10 $1,370 0 50 28 $3,836 20 $2,740 5 S685 83 511,372 Senior Engineer $195 12 52,340 0 50 0 50 0 50 15 52,925 8 $1,560 35 56,825 Scientist V (Biologist) $130 0 SO 0 SO 20 52,596 0 SO 0 SO 5 5649 25 53,245 GIS Analyst II 5110 0 50 4 5438 5 5548 5 5548 10 51,095 10 51,095 34 $3,723 Contract Administrator $100 1 $100 1 5100 1 5100 2 5200 1 5100 1 5100 7 5698 Enginccring Technician 566 0 SO 0 $0 0 SO 8 5528 0 SO 0 50 8 $528 Labor Total 38 $5,976 25 $3,499 28 $3,562 59 $7,657 54 $8,133 39 $5,680 243 534,506 Travel and ODCs Unit Cost Units Cost Units Cost Units Cost Units Cost Units Cost Units Cost Subtotal Units Travel from Cocoa to IRC S70 1 S70 1 $70 0 50 2 S140 0 SO 0 SO 4 5280 Lodging(nights) $183 0 SO 0 SO 0 50 8 51,464 0 SO 0 SO 8 $1,464 Travel day per dicm S46 0 SO 0 50 0 SO 4 $183 0 SO 0 SO 4 5183 Per diem 561 0 50 0 SO 0 SO 6 5366 0 SO 0 SO 6 5366 Mobilization of Drilling Equipment 5450 0 50 0 50 0 50 2 5900 0 $0 0 SO 2 S900 Standard Pcnctration Test (per foot) 516.5 0 SO 0 50 0 50 480 57,920 0 50 0 50 480 57,920 Piezometer wells (per foot) S25 0 50 0 50 0 50 120 $3,000 0 SO 0 50 120 $3,000 Permeability Tcsts (per slug tcst) 5500 0 50 0 50 0 50 6 $3,000 0 50 0 50 6 $3,000 InternalLabTest- PercentFincs $55 0 SO 0 50 0 $0 20 $1,100 0 50 0 50 20 51,100 Internal Lab Tcst - Attcrbcrg Limits $125 0 SO 0 50 0 $0 4 5500 0 50 0 50 4 $500 Internal Lab Test - Sicve Analysis $65 0 SO 0 50 0 SO 6 $390 0 50 0 $0 6 5390 Travel and ODCs Total $70 $70 $0 518,963 50 50 519,103 Subcontractor (cost +10%) Unit Cost Units Cost Units Cost Units Cost Units Cost Units Cost Units Cost Subtotal Units EDR Reporting 5420 0 SO 1 5462 0 SO 0 50 0 SO 0 50 1 5462 Laboratory (Pesticides Organochlorine) 565 0 SO 0 SO 0 SO 4 $286 0 SO 0 50 4 $286 Laboratory (Pesticides Organophosphorus) S110 0 SO 0 SO 0 SO 4 5484 0 SO 0 $0 4 5484 Laboratory (Arsenic) 535 0 SO 0 50 0 SO 4 5154 0 SO 0 SO 4 5154 Laboratory (Herbicides) 5110 0 SO 0 SO 0 SO 4 5484 0 SO 0 50 4 5484 Subcontractor Total $0 $462 $0 $1,408 $0 $0 $1,870 PROJECT TOTAL $6,046 S4,031 53,562 S28,028 $8,133 S5.680 555,480 288 12.G,3 Departmental Item INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF UTILITY SERVICES Date: March 12, 2019 To: Jason E. Brown, County Administrator From: Vincent Burke, P.E., Director of Utility Services Prepared By: Eric Charest, Environmental Compliance Analyst Arjuna Weragoda, P.E., Capital Projects Manager Point Source Facilities Allocations and Canals Reclassification, Tetra Tech Work Order No. 3 Subject: DESCRIPTIONS AND CONDITIONS: Indian River County Department of Utility Services (IRCDUS) was formed when the unincorporated areas of Indian River County's water, wastewater, and solid waste utility services were consolidated under one department. IRCDUS now provides water and wastewater services to more than 50,000 direct accounts. The potable water system, which is the largest in the County, provides water to approximately 110,000 people and businesses in its service area. The water system includes two reverse osmosis water treatment plants with two disposal sites for the demineralization concentrate. IRCDUS's wastewater collection and treatment system covers a Targe geographical area that is comprised of five sewer service areas: North Regional, Sea Oaks, Central Regional (Gifford), West Regional and South Regional. The treated effluent is currently used as reclaimed for irrigation, discharged to the wetlands for further treatment or discharged to Rapid Infiltration Basins (RIBs). IRCDUS's three surface water disposal sites - Osprey Marsh, Spoonbill Marsh, and the West Regional Wetlands - have stringent Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) allocations. These point source allocations were incorporated into each facility's permit and is within the Central Indian River Lagoon (IRL) Basin Management Action Plan (BMAP). The Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) is in the process of reevaluating the Central IRL BMAP to create an update for the next steps in BMAP implementation. IRCDUS is interested in evaluating options to aggregate the point source facilities allocations to account for the Targe nutrient reductions occurring at these facilities and to allow for operational flexibility in meeting BMAP allocations. ANALYSIS: To assist the County in this endeavor, Tetra Tech, as part of their 2018 Continuing Contract Agreement for Professional Services (CCNA), provided a scope of work. In order for IRCDUS to have the flexibility in meeting BMAP allocations, Tetra Tech proposed the following outline in Exhibit A under Work Order 3. 289 C:\Users\legistar\AppData\Local\Temp\BCL Technologies\easyPDF 8\@BCL@COODAC39\@BCL@COODAC39.docx Task 1- Coordination Meeting with FDEP: In this task Tetra Tech and County staff will discuss in detail IRCDUS' request to aggregate the wasteload allocations identified in the three-point source National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permits. Part of that discussion is to determine a path forward that may include reclassifying some of the drainage canals within the County and then aggregating the point source NPDES facility wasteload allocations. Task 2 - Waterbody Reclassification: Depending on the outcome of Task 1, a portion, or ALL, of Task 2 will be completed. Task 3 - Aggregate Permit: Depending on the outcome of Task 1, Task 2 (Waterbody Reclassification) may or may not be completed. But if the result of Task 1 is to have a portion, or ALL, of Task 2 completed, then Task 3 will only be completed once concurrence of waterbody reclassification has been received by the FDEP. If Task 1 completion receives concurrence from FDEP, then Task 3 can be completed without Task 2. In this scenario, Task 2 will not be performed or billed. Therefore, fees to be paid under Tetra Tech's Work Order No. 3 is dependent on the results of each task (i.e., if Task 1 and 3 are successfully completed, then payment will only be made for those tasks). A detailed project cost of each task is outlined in Work Order No. 3. The total negotiated cost to perform the evaluation for the point source facilities allocations and canals reclassification in Tetra Tech's Work Order No. 3 is $27,010.00. FUNDING: Funds for the due diligence investigation are derived from Other Professional Services account in the operating fund. Operating fund revenues are generated from water and sewer sales. Description Account Number Amount Other Professional Services 47123536-033190 $27,010.00 RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of Work Order No. 3 authorizing the mentioned professional services and requests the Board of County Commissioners to authorize the Chairman to execute Work Order No. 3 on their behalf for a total sum amount of $27,010.00 to Tetra Tech. ATTACHMENT(s): 1. Tetra Tech CCNA-2018 Work Order No.3: Point Source Facilities Allocations and Canals Reclassification (7 Pages) C:\Users\legistar\AppData\Local\Temp\BCL Technologies\easyPDF 8\@BCL@COODAC39\@BCL@ COODAC39.docx 290 CCNA2018 WORK ORDER 03 Point Source Facilities Allocations and Canals Reclassification This Work Order Number 03 is entered into as of this 26th day of March, 2019, pursuant to that certain Continuing Consulting Engineering Services Agreement for Professional Services entered into as of this 17th day of April, 2018 (collectively referred to as the "Agreement"), by and between INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Florida ("COUNTY") and Tetra Tech, Inc. ("Consultant"). The COUNTY has selected the Consultant to perform the professional services set forth on Exhibit A (Scope of Work), attached to this Work Order and made part hereof by this reference. The professional services will be performed by the Consultant for the fee schedule set forth in Exhibit B (Fee Schedule), attached to this Work Order and made a part hereof by this reference. The Consultant will perform the professional services within the timeframe more particularly set forth in Exhibit C (Time Schedule), attached to this Work Order and made a part hereof by this reference all in accordance with the terms and provisions set forth in the Agreement. Pursuant to paragraph 1.4 of the Agreement, nothing contained in any Work Order shall conflict with the terms of the Agreement and the terms of the Agreement shall be deemed to be incorporated in each individual Work Order as if fully set forth herein. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Work Order as of the date first written above. CONSULTANT: By: By: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY Matthew Shelton " , Chairman Print Name: Title: Project Manager BCC Approved Date: Attest: Jeffrey R. Smith, Clerk of Court and Comptroller By: Approved: Approved as to form and legal sufficiency: Deputy Clerk Jason E. Brown, County Administrator Dylan T. Reingold, County Attorney 291 Exhibit A TETRA TECH February 28, 2019 Eric Charest Indian River County Department of Utility Services 1801 27th Street Vero Beach, Florida 32960 Email: echarestircgov.com Subject: Proposal to Indian River County Department of Utility Services for Point Source Facilities Allocations and Canals Reclassification Dear Mr. Charest: Tetra Tech, Inc. (Tetra Tech) is pleased to provide the Indian River County Department of Utility Services (IRCDUS) with this proposal for services to support aggregating the point source National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) facility allocations and reclassifying canals, as needed. BACKGROUND Indian River County is a stakeholder in the Central Indian River Lagoon (IRL) Basin Management Action Plan (BMAP). The BMAP was adopted in 2013 and it did not assign detailed allocations to stormwater. However, the adopted total maximum daily load (TMDL) assigned allocations to the point source NPDES facilities using the 95th percentile of each facility's annual loads from the period of 2000 through 2005 (based on measured monthly flows and nutrient concentrations, not the facility design capacity). These point source allocations were incorporated into each facility permit. IRCDUS has three facilities within the Central IRL BMAP that discharge to surface waters within the IRL basin: West Regional Wastewater Treatment Facility (WWTF), North County Reverse Osmosis (RO) Concentrate Discharge Facility, and South County RO Concentrate Discharge Facility. The Florida Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) is in the process of reevaluating the Central IRL BMAP to create an update for the next steps in BMAP implementation. The Central IRL BMAP will include detailed allocations to the stormwater sources. IRCDUS is interested in evaluating options to aggregate the point source facility allocations to account for the large nutrient reductions occurring at these facilities and to allow for flexibility in meeting BMAP allocations. The wasteload allocations are set so aggregating the permits gives IRCDUS flexibility in achieving the TMDL. Aggregating the permits would recognize the investment that IRCDUS has made into their point sources facilities and would allow IRCDUS to keep up with growth and the facilities' hydraulic design capacities. The aggregate permit will be a separate permit from the individual facility permits. Tetra Tech, Inc. 11 Riverside Drive, Suite 204, Cocoa, FL 32922 Tel 321.636.6470 Fax 321.636.6473 www.tetratec 92 Eric Charest February 28, 2019 Page 2 of 4 SCOPE OF WORK Tetra Tech is proposing the following tasks to assist Indian River County with meeting their TMDL and BMAP allocations. Task 1. Coordination Meetings IRCDUS staff have had preliminary discussions with DEP staff about aggregating the point source facility allocations into one permit. Based on initial feedback from DEP staff, it seems that if some of the waterbodies are reclassified from "streams" that must meet Class III water quality standards to "canals" that have less stringent water quality requirements, it may be easier for DEP to approve an aggregate permit. The West Regional WWTF discharges through the following canals: Lateral D Canal, Lateral C Canal, and Main Canal. The South County RO Concentrate Discharge Facility discharges through the following canals: Sub -Lateral J-1 Canal, Lateral J Canal, and South Relief Canal. The first step in this process will be to hold a meeting(s) with DEP assessment and BMAP staff to discuss in detail IRCDUS' request to aggregate the point source NPDES facility allocations and determine the path forward — reclassifying all or some of the canals named above and then aggregating the point source NPDES facility allocations or only aggregating the allocations. Tetra Tech will coordinate with IRCDUS and DEP staff to set up the meeting(s) and will attend the meeting(s) in-person with DEP. Tetra Tech will prepare a summary from each meeting to have a record of the discussion. This task would include up to two meetings with DEP. If, through coordination with DEP, it is determined that all or some of the canals listed above need to be reclassified, coordination meeting(s) will be needed with the Indian River Farms Water Control District (IRFWCD) since these canals are owned by the district. Tetra Tech will coordinate with IRCDUS, IRFWCD staff, and the district's engineers to set up a meeting(s) to discuss the reclassification. Tetra Tech will prepare a meeting summary from each meeting to have a record of the discussion. This would include up to two meetings with IRFWCD, and Tetra Tech will attend one meeting in-person. Task 2. Waterbody Reclassification This task would be completed only if DEP requires that some or all the canals named above be reclassified to provide an aggregate allocation for the NPDES facilities permits. These waterbodies can be reclassified as canals if information is provided to demonstrate that they meet the following requirements: • Be man-made, or predominantly channelized or predominantly physically altered; • Be primarily used for water management purposes, such as flood protection, stormwater management, irrigation, or water supply; and • Have marginal or poor stream habitat or habitat components, such as a lack of habitat or substrate that is biologically limited, because the conveyance has cross sections that are predominantly trapezoidal, has armored banks, or is maintained primarily for water conveyance. 293 Eric Charest February 28, 2019 Page 3 of 4 Tetra Tech will work with IRCDUS staff and IRFWCD staff to gather information and create geographic information system (GIS) maps to provide the following details to DEP in support of reclassification: • Map showing the waterbody identification (WBID) numbers for the canals. • Historical and current photographs or topographic maps showing that the waterbody is either manmade or predominately channelized or physically altered. • Information on the current primary purpose of the waterbody such as a narrative description, photographs, operational protocols, permits, memorandums of understanding, contracts, etc. • Demonstration of maintenance such as records of herbicide application, physical removal of aquatic substrate, dredging of sediments, or removal of riparian trees. • Details on the land uses, point sources, and municipal separate storm sewer systems (MS4s) in the area. • Details or the affected TMDLs and BMAP area. Tetra Tech will work with IRCDUS to submit this documentation and will assist with providing additional details for up to two requests for additional information from DEP to obtain approval for the reclassification. Task 3. Aggregate Permit This task will occur after receiving approval from DEP for the waterbody reclassification in Task 2 or after the meeting with DEP in Task 1, if it is determined that the streams do not need to be reclassified to aggregate the permits. Tetra Tech will coordinate with IRCDUS staff, DEP staff in the local district office, and DEP BMAP staff to determine what information is needed to create an aggregate permit. The purpose of the aggregate permit will be to aggregate the wasteload allocation assigned to three IRCDUS point source NPDES facilities to provide flexibility in meeting the TMDL load allocations. The aggregate permit will be a separate permit from the individual facility permits. Tetra Tech will assist IRCDUS staff in preparing the application and supporting documents for the aggregate permit. Tetra Tech will also assist with providing additional details for up to two requests for additional information from DEP to obtain the aggregate permit. PROJECT SCHEDULE Tetra Tech anticipates commencing project activities upon receipt of a task order authorization from IRCDUS. This project is anticipated to be completed by September 30, 2019. This schedule may be subject to change upon agreement between IRCDUS and Tetra Tech. ASSUMPTIONS Tetra Tech's scope of services, project costs, and schedule were developed with the following assumptions: • IRCDUS and IRFWCD will provide supporting materials in a timely manner. 294 Eric Charest February 28, 2019 Page 4 of 4 • DEP will review materials submitted for the waterbody reclassification and aggregate permit in a timely manner. • IRCDUS will pay the fees associated with the waterbody reclassification and aggregate permit. PROJECT COST The estimated costs are based on our current understanding of the project requirements and best estimates of level of effort required to perform the basic services and may be subject to change upon agreement between IRCDUS and Tetra Tech. The estimated project costs are shown in the table below. This proposed project would be completed on a time and materials basis not to exceed $27,010. The rates provided below are estimated, and rates provided on invoices will be based on direct labor multiplier of 3.0 for each staff member, as outlined in the Indian River County Professional Services Hourly Rate Fee Schedule, provided as Exhibit 1 of the Continuing Contract Agreement for Continuing Engineering Services RFQ2018008. Personnel Classification Hourly Rate Task 1. Coordination Meetings Task 2. Waterbody Reclassification Task 3. Aggregate Permit Subtotal Hours Total Hours Cost Hours Cost Hours Cost Project Manager $155 34 $5,270 60 $9,300 40 $6,200 134 $20,770 GIS Analyst II $110 0 $0 30 $3,300 16 $1,760 46 $5,060 Contract Administrator $100 4 $400 2 $200 2 $200 8 $800 Labor Total 38 55,670 92 512,800 58 58,160 188 $26,630 Travel Unit Cost Units Cost Travel from Tallahassee to Indian River County $380 1 $380 $380 Travel Total $380 $380 PROJECT TOTAL 527,010 IRCDUS will be invoiced each month for services rendered during the previous calendar month based on a time and materials basis. Tetra Tech shall be paid for all invoices within 30 days of an approved submittal. Tetra Tech looks forward to working with you on this project. We are available to discuss our approach with you in detail at your convenience. Should you have any questions regarding this proposal, please contact me at (850) 536-8115 or Matt Shelton at (321) 637-8009. Sincerely, Marcy Frick Project Manager Cc: Matthew Shelton, Tetra Tech Brian Watson, P.E., Tetra Tech 295 Posltlon/Titles Exhibit 8 Tetra Tech, Inc. Indian River County Professional Services Hourly Rate Fee Schedule Effective October 1, 2017, through September 30, 2020t11 Raw Labor Rates Direct tabor Raw tabor Rates x Multiplier Rate Minimum Maximum Multiplier Minimum Maximum Protect Management Sr Project Manager $ 52.00 $ 80.00 3.0 5 156.00 $ 240.00 Project Manager $ 41.00 $ 68.00 3.0 5 123.00 $ 204.00 Engineers Principal Engineer $ 70.00 $ 99.00 3.0 $ 210.00 5 297.00 Sr. Engineer 5 50.00 $ 79.00 3.0 S 150.00 $ 237.00 Engineer V $ 39.00 5 61.00 3.0 $ 117.00 $ 183.00 Engineer IV $ 32.00 $ 49.00 3.0 $ 96.00 5 147.00 Engineer !II $ 26.00 5 40,00 3.0 $ 78.00 $ 120.00 Engineer II 5 24.00 $ 34.00 3.0 $ 72.00 $ 102.00 Engineer! $ 22.00 $ 29.00 3.0 5 66.00 $ 87.00 Engineering Technician $ 12.00 $ 22.00 3.0 $ 36.00 5 66.00 Scientists Scientist Vl $ 45.00 $ 71.00 3.0 $ 135.00 $ 213.00 Scientist V $ 31.00 $ 57.00 3.0 $ 93.00 $ 171.00 Scientist IV $ 27.00 $ 38.00 3.0 $ 81.00 $ 114,00 Scientist III $ 24.00 5 30.00 3.0 $ 72.00 5 90.00 Scientist 11 $ 20.00 $ 26.00 3.0 $ 60.00 $ 78.00 ScientistI $ 19.00 $ 23.00 3.0 $ 57.00 -$ 69.00 Design Professionals Sr CAD/Eng Designer II 5 39.00 $ 52.00 3.0 5 117.00 $ 156.00 Sr CAD/Eng Designer 1 $ 26.00 $ 40.00 3.0 $ 78.00 $ 120.00 CAD/EngineeringDeslgneril $ 24.00 $ 33.00 3.0 $ 72.00 $ 99.00 CAD/EngineeringDesigneril $ 18.00 $ 24.00 3.0 $ 54.00 $ 72.00 CAD/Engineering Designer $ 16.00 $ 21.00 3.0 $ 48.00 $ 63.00 Surveyors Sr Land Surveyor 5 41.00 5 50.00 3.0 $ 123.00 5 150.00 Land Surveyor $ 28.00 5 40.00 3.0 $ 84.00 5 120.00 Survey Crew Chief $ 24.00 5 38.00 .3.0 5 72.00 5 114.00 Survey Tech $ 17.00 5 30,00 3.0 5 51.00 5 90.00 Architects Architectural Program Mgr $ 65.00 $ 85.00 3.0 5 195.00 $ 255.00 5r Architect $ 55.00 $ 75.00 3.0 $ 165.00 $ 225,00 Architect $ 35.00 $ 55.00 3.0 $ 105.00 $ 165.00 Architectural Designer 5 17.00 $ 35.00 3.0 $ 51.00 $ 105,00 Construction Professionals Construction Project Rep $ 22.00 $ 42.00 3.0 $ 66.00 5 116.00 Construction. Manager II $ 50.00 5 70.00 3.0 $ 150.00 $ 210.00 Construction Manager l 5 38.00 5 54.00 3.0 $ . 114.00 $ 162.00 Construction Administrator $ 23.00 $ 39.00 3.0 $ 69.00 $ 117.00 GISAnafysts Sr Analyst 5 30.00 5 65.00 3.0 $ 90.00 $ 195.00 Project Analyst 1i $ 24.00 $ 40.00 3.0 $ 72.00 $ 1.20.00 Project Analyst! S 18.00 $ 28.00 3.0 $ 54.00 5 84.00 Protect Administration Sr Project Administrator $ 27.00 5 35.00 3.0 5 81,00 $ 105.00 Project Administrator $ 15.00 $ 32.00 3.0 $ 45.00 $ 96.00 Project Assistant $ 12.00 5 22.00 3.0 $ 36.00 $ 66.00 Contract Administrator 5 25.00 $ 36.00 3.0 $ 75.00 $ 108.00 Subconsultant Cost r 20% Reimbursable Expenses Engineer's ReimbursableTravel/Mileage At Cost Other Direct Costs At Cost ['/These hourly billing rates will remain effective for the initial duration of this Agreement, and may be renegotiated should an additional renewal period be exercised. 296 Exhibit C Point Source Facilities Allocations and Canals Reclassification PROJECT SCHEDULE Tetra Tech anticipates commencing project activities upon receipt of a task order authorization from IRCDUS. This project is anticipated to be completed by September 30, 2019. This schedule may be subject to change upon agreement between IRCDUS and Tetra Tech. 297 12,G. Departmental Item INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF UTILITY SERVICES Date: March 14, 2019 To: Jason E. Brown, County Administrator From: Vincent Burke, P.E., Director of Utility Services Prepared By: Arjuna Weragoda, P.E., Capital Projects Manager Subject: Reclaimed Water Master Plan DESCRIPTIONS AND CONDITIONS: On November 13, 2018, the Indian River County Board of County Commissioners (BCC) authorized staff to negotiate a cost proposal for a detailed evaluation of a Re -use Master Plan using one of the engineering firms from the 2018 Continuing Consulting Engineering Services Agreement for Professional Services. ANALYSIS: Indian River County has historically provided reclaimed water (a.k.a. re -use) to area golf courses for irrigation. Currently, the existing re -use pipe network is not pressurized. Most of the distribution of re -use is discharged to self-contained ponds via open ended pipes. The last reuse master plan study was completed in 2004. Since then, numerous changes/additions to our system have occurred. The Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) prefers the wastewater effluent to be re -used rather than surface water discharge. Therefore, this evaluation will not only focus on hydraulic modeling and future demand, but also on regulatory compliance considerations now and potentially in to the future. Typically, the general practice when addressing future utility funding requirements to support an expansion of pressurized re -use countywide is for the utility to first identify the capital requirements and associated timetables through engineering studies, including a capital program funding feasibility study. Therefore, the master plan is the first part of the evaluation where the County would identify the capital requirements and associated timetables to implement those requirements. The work order has been provided in accordance with the Continuing Contract Agreement for Professional Engineering Services with Atkins dated April 17, 2018. The scope is more specifically described in the attached Work Order No. 2. The total negotiated cost for Work Order No. 2 is a total sum amount of $174,909. 298 C:\Users\legistar\AppData\Local\Temp\BCL Technologies\easyPDF 8\@BCL@ F80D8908\@BCL@ F80D8908.docx FUNDING: Funding for the Reuse Master Plan is available within the Utilities Operating Fund. Operating fund revenues are generated from water and sewer sales. Description Account Number Amount Other Professional Services 47123536-033190 $174,909.00 RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of Work Order No. 2 authorizing the mentioned professional services and requests the Board of County Commissioners to authorize the Chairman to execute Work Order No. 2 on their behalf for a total sum amount of $174,909.00 to Atkins. ATTACHMENT(s): Work Order No. 2 and supporting documents (12 Pages) 299 • Page 2 of 2 C:\Users\l egista r\AppData\Local\Temp\BCL Technologies\easyPD F 8\@BCL@ F80D8908\@BCL@ F80D8908. docx CCNA2018 WORK ORDER 02 RECLAIMED WATER MASTER PLAN This Work Order Number _ is entered into as of this — day of , 201, pursuantto that certain Continuing Consulting Engineering Services Agreement for Professional Services entered into as of this 17"' day of April, 2018 (collectively referred to as the "Agreement"), by and between INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Florida ("COUNTY") and Atkins ("Consultant"). The COUNTY has selected the Consultant to perform the professional services set forth on Exhibit A (Scope of Work), attached to this Work Order and made part hereof by this reference. The professional services will be performed by the Consultant for the fee schedule set forth, in Exhibit B (Fee Schedule), attached to this Work Order and made a part hereof by this reference. The Consultant will perform the professional services within the timeframe more particularly set forth in Exhibit C (Time Schedule), attached to this Work Order and made a part hereof by this reference all in accordance with the terms and provisions set forth in the Agreement. Pursuant to paragraph 1.4 of the Agreement, nothing contained in any Work Order shall conflict with the terms of the Agreement and the terms of the Agreement shall be deemed to be incorporated in each individual Work Order as if fully set forth herein. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Work Order as of the date first written above. CONSULTANT: By: Print Name: t,,(; j-J,A�t 1 , Title: By: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY , Chairman v� 1 / - Q rc, peiji BCC Approved Date: Attest: Jeffrey R. Smith, Clerk of Court and Comptroller By: Approved: Approved as to form and legal sufficiency: Deputy Clerk Jason E. Brown, County Administrator Dylan T. Reingold, County Attorney 300 Indian River County Reclaimed Water Master Plan Scope of Services IRCDUS desires to expand its reclaimed water system and has requested ATKINS to update a detailed Reclaimed Water Master Plan. The proposed scope of services includes the following tasks. Task 1 Data Collection Objective: Obtain the necessary data required for development of the Reclaimed Master Plan. Data may be summarized in sections of the Master Plan document or may be used as inputs to model development. ATKINS and IRCDUS will work together to identify data and compile a list of documents that may be needed to complete the Reclaimed Water Master Plan. It is assumed that data relevant to the Master Plan will be in databases, GIS, and spreadsheets. It is anticipated that the data collection should be completed within a four-week time period. After the initial data is collected, ATKINS will identify data that is missing or data that will need additional efforts to collect. This data will subsequently serve as the basis for the development of the hydraulic models that will be used to help in developing and evaluating reclaimed alternatives. IRCDUS AND ATKINS will agree on a time to freeze all data inputs and updates for Master Planning purposes. The following data will be gathered from IRCDUS and other public sources for use in the Master Planning efforts. The level of effort for this task assumes that this information is readily available, accessible and complete for the purposes of this Master Plan: a Reports on existing facilities as completed by IRCDUS 's other Consultant(s), including but not limited to, the latest edition of the reclaimed water master plan, facility asset information, and related studies. ■ Existing permits for reclaimed facilities, including FDEP operating permits. e Growth projections and future reclaimed water demands will be obtained from the IRCDUS planning and related internal departments. o GIS mapping data containing land use and population projections by parcel and containing a road/street database complete and detailed enough for the geocoding process. o GIS data containing pipelines, facilities, service areas, roads, etc., that will be necessary for completion of the Master Plan. o Existing hydraulic models with associated databases for the reclaimed water systems. e Reclaimed Water billing and customer information to supplement the overall projections developed in the UF Bureau of Economic and Business Research (BEBR), to be used in the Master Plan. o Historical monthly reclaimed water billing data and water production data in electronic 301 format by major plant (or service area). o Historical water quality data, for wastewater and reclaimed water. ie Pump curves of the high service pumps, size and operating levels of the storage tanks, pertinent yard piping, and other information needed to mimic the WWTPs reclaimed facilities in the hydraulic model. o Hydrologic flow and stage records and relevant statistics (daily time series, monthly average and median flows, etc.). Reclaimed water quality records and relevant statistics (weekly/monthly time series, monthly average and median concentrations, etc.) for water supply sources. o Data concerning existing effluent disposal systems and future reclaimed water systems anticipated, regarding IRCDUS 's reclaimed water system. e Historical operations and maintenance (O&M) cost data by major categories. o System maintenance and failure records including pipe break reports, any pipe replacement or rehabilitation, and other maintenance history information. ® Known interconnections from other systems that have master meters capable of providing accurate flow data. • Summaries of key interlocal agreements, developer agreements, and agreements with cities, counties or utilities as IRCDUS wants considered in the Master Plan. Generally, service area boundaries will be sufficient for planning purposes. • Copy of IRCDUS recent bid data for reclaimed water projects. Task 2 GIS Data Gathering and Analysis, Service Area Analysis, and Demand Projections Objective: Gather and analyze GIS data for use in the Master Planning process and develop reclaimed water demands for the forecast period. Subtask 2.1 GIS Data Gathering and Analysis Subtask 2.1.1 GIS Information Gathering This subtask will be one of the first items to be initiated after the kickoff meeting. This subtask will serve to collect existing IRCDUS GIS files that will serve as the basis for the hydraulic model and to collect IRCDUS demographic and planning GIS files to support the population and demand projection efforts. Our approach includes on-site time to review the GIS data with key staff to better understand the current state of spatial data collection within IRCDUS. Subtask 2.1.2 GIS Information Gathering - Other ATKINS will meet with the following agencies to collect additional GIS related files that will support the Master Planning effort. They are: • St Johns River Water Management District (SJRWMD) • University of Florida Bureau of Economic and Business Research (UF BEBR) Subtask 2.1.3 GIS Data Summary Workshop ATKINS propose conducting a GIS data summary workshop meeting to review with IRCDUS, the results of the data gathering effort. The purpose of the meeting will be to agree on the data collected and identify additional data "deficiencies" that will need to be collected to develop and/or enhance the Master Planning or modeling effort and robust enough for future inclusion in asset management (CMMS) and enterprise GIS implementation. If these data are critical to 302 the Master Planning task, and are not available, ATKINS will identify additional services that may be needed to fill these needs. Subtask 2.2 Service Area Analysis and Demand Projections An evaluation will be conducted on whether sections of the service area are economically, hydraulically feasible and worthy of including reclaimed water service. Demand projections will be omitted from areas that deem not feasible. The development of reclaimed water demands will include service areas confirmed feasible for reclaimed water distribution. Subtask 2.2.1 Review of Previous Master Plans ATKINS will review and summarize the most current master planning documents for reclaimed water. The demand data used for previous master planning efforts will be summarized and categorized land uses identified for the demand development. Subtask 2.2.2 Growth Projection Evaluation Future growth projections will be developed from data published by the University of Florida Bureau of Economic and Business Research (BEBR) and the SJRWMD population projections, as well as discussions with IRCDUS. ATKINS will utilize the current IRCDUS Land Plan to categorize each parcel within IRCDUS 's service areas. ATKINS will participate in one meeting with staff from the IRCDUS Planning Department to identify planned development and projected growth through the 20 -year planning period. Subtask 2.2.3 Current and Historical Data Review ATKINS will review and summarize IRCDUS 's current reclaimed water billing data; historical reclaimed water production; historical wastewater treatment; and SCADA at the reclaimed water pump stations. Subtask 2.2.4 Development of Demands/Flows Utilizing the demand and flow data compiled in Subtasks 3.2.1 through 3.2.3, ATKINS will develop current and projected reclaimed water demands for IRCDUS 's service areas. ATKINS will develop low, medium, and high demand projections through a collaborative effort with IRCDUS. Reclaimed water demands will consist of average day, maximum day, and peak hour scenarios. The demands and flows will be developed in such a manner as to be useful in the reclaimed water distribution system model (i.e. within areas and nodes - of the reclaimed water system). Projections will include 5,10, and 20 -year horizons. Subtask 2.2.5 Demand Projection Workshop ATKINS will develop a summary of the population / demand forecast data and will prepare and facilitate a workshop with IRCDUS to review the various agency demand forecasts. The purpose of this workshop is to secure IRCDUS concurrence with demand projections. Subtask 2.3 Technical Memorandum ATKINS will summarize the GIS data collected in Task 3.1 and the demand projections developed in Task 3.2 in a Technical Memorandum. The Technical Memorandum will identify any deficiencies that require additional research or effort to collect or develop. Three copies of the draft Technical Memorandum will be submitted to IRCDUS for review. Comments received 303 on the draft Technical Memorandum will be incorporated into the Master Plan. One copy of the draft Technical Memorandum will be provided in Portable Document Format (PDF). Task 3 Hydraulic Modeling Objective: Obtain copies of existing hydraulic models from IRCDUS (assumed WaterCAD), review, update and run hydraulic models for the reclaimed water system. ATKINS will obtain and review the existing system hydraulic models developed by prior IRCDUS CONSULTANT(S) and recommend modifications or enhancements, prior to updating the models, model assumptions, and growth projections. Atkins will identify data that is missing or data that will need additional efforts to collect, which may require additional services. Subtask 3.1 Hydraulic Models Setup This task consists of preparing the existing hydraulic model for IRCDUS 's reclaimed water system. The model elements that will be reviewed include pumping facilities, storage tanks in the system, and major transmission/distribution lines (6 -inch and larger pipe). ATKINS assumes that the GIS, CAD, and record drawing files that are available and to be provided by IRCDUS are complete with the attributes (i.e. diameter, pipe material, coordinates, fittings with sufficient resolution, pump station locations) required for the creation of the hydraulic models. ATKINS also assumes that the files have undergone a quality assurance/quality control (QA/QC) process by IRCDUS. Atkins also assumes that the GIS of the modeled pipes and nodes were checked for connectivity (i.e. gaps and overshoots/undershoots have been eliminated). ATKINS included 80 hours in the budget for quality control of these files and to incorporate this data into the hydraulic models. This scope of work does include effort to input the appropriate characteristics of plants and pump stations into the models relative to steady-state modeling approaches and does not include effort to add existing pipes to the models that are not present in the GIS files. Additionally, the SUBCONSULTANT has included limited time to interview IRCDUS staff to obtain insight on system issues and characteristics related to the modeling. Subtask 3.2 Hydraulic Models Validation Of critical importance to the use of any hydraulic model as a predictive tool is a comprehensive validation effort. ATKINS shall calibrate the current hydraulic model to observed actual conditions derived from IRCDUS's SCADA system as part of past master planning efforts. An allowance of 40 hours has been included to perform validation through hydraulic model analyses using available flow monitoring and SCADA data. Additional effort required beyond the allowance will require an amendment to this Scope of Work. Subtask 3.3 Development of Future Model Scenarios ATKINS will incorporate three future demand scenarios into the model using demand data for the 5,10 and 20 demand years. The general modeling approach to develop Master Plan recommendations includes: 304 Subtask 3.3.1 Reclaimed Water Model ATKINS will perform hydraulic modeling analyses to identify areas in the system with possible deficiencies in the distribution system during present and future demand scenarios. These locations will be identified by running the system under peak -hour demand conditions, using a criterion of a minimum pressure of 45 psi at all locations. Areas of low pressure will be identified, and additional piping recommendations will be provided to alleviate the issues. The hydraulic model will be used to evaluate alternatives needed to meet future reclaimed water demands. Improvements may consist of new reclaimed water mains; new pumps at existing pump stations, new booster pump stations, and new storage tanks. Attention will be made to HSPs, GSTs and SCADA controls that may be needed, as a result of the modeling analysis. Subtask 3.4 Technical Memorandum ATKINS will develop a Technical Memorandum summarizing the results of the hydraulic modeling. Three copies of the draft Technical Memorandum will be submitted to IRCDUS for review. One copy of the draft Technical Memorandum will be provided in Portable Document Format (PDF). A half day workshop with IRCDUS will be conducted to review the draft Technical Memorandum and hydraulic modeling. Comments received on the draft Technical Memorandum will be incorporated into the Master Plan. Additionally, ATKINS will provide IRCDUS with digital copies of final model scenarios. Task 4 Review Regulatory Compliance Considerations Objective: Identifif regulatory compliance issues that will have an effect on the Reclaimed Master Planning process. Current and future regulations and permitting requirements will be important considerations in maintaining and expanding the existing system. In this task, ATKINS will identify regulatory issues that may be relevant to the Master Plan. Information relative to these acts, rules, or programs within the context of master planning will be briefly summarized in a Technical Memorandum. This work will be accomplished through the following subtasks: Subtask 4.1 Existing Regulations Summarize existing regulations (federal/state/local) regulations concerningreclaimed water including cross connection control program offered by the County. Existing reuse connection requirements are defined in County's existing Land Development Regulation (LDR) Section 918.06. Consultant will summarize any proposed changes that may be required to this section of LDR as result of the master plan. County will undertake the process to make the changes to the LDR. Subtask 4.2 Existing and Pending Permits Summarize existing permits, as well as, any pending or future permits that will be required for reclaimed water supply and quality, and facility siting (federal/state/local), covering the same categories as listed above. 305 Subtask 4.3 Future and Pending Regulations Summarize pending regulations and permits (currently drafted but not promulgated). For example, there are several currently pending federal regulations governing groundwater and distribution systems that should be considered before any facility upgrades (Emerging Contaminants, Numeric Nutrient, Ground Water Rule, Total Coliform Rule, Water Treatment Residuals, and Stage 2 Disinfection Byproducts Rule). Subtask 4.4 Contact State and Federal Regulators Review the regulatory and permitting summary through meetings with state/local regulators and phone calls with federal regulators. These meetings/phone calls will not be extensive but geared to understand regulators thinking on pending and future regulations. Subtask 4.5 Technical Memorandum The impact of current and future regulations to IRCDUS identified from Subtasks 5.1 through 5.4 will be summarized in a Technical Memorandum which will be submitted to IRCDUS for review and comment. Three copies of the draft Technical Memorandum will be submitted to IRCDUS for review. One copy of the draft Technical Memorandum will be provided in Portable Document Format (PDF) on a CD. Comments received on the draft Technical Memorandum will be incorporated into the Master Plan. Task 5 Development of Construction Cost Estimates Objective: Development of estimates of probable construction costs across all of IRCDUS 's asset classes, to create an equitable assessment of costs for project comparisons and prioritization. ATKINS will provide the following services related to development of a standardized method for establishing estimates of probable construction costs: ATKINS will review and summarize recent bid data collected by IRCDUS to initiate the development of standardized costs for individual items typically associated with the construction of reclaimed systems. These items will include, but may not be limited to, excavation and backfill, pipeline materials and installation, valves, pump stations, storage tanks, and ancillary items such as roadway repair and resurfacing. ATKINS will review and summarize its own recent bid data (gathered from the region -Florida and Georgia) in similar construction site environment and project types. ATKINS will summarize the data obtained and reviewed in tabular form. The costs will be tied to the date the Master Plan work is completed. The table will include bid item descriptions and unit costs, along with any assumptions made in the development of the estimated costs. The data will be tied to a regional index (either using ENR's adjusted construction cost index, or a similar index) to allow for the escalation of costs for projects recommended in future capital improvement plans (i.e. when looking at the master plans during the planning period, costs will be able to be re -estimated closer to the actual date of implementation). The summary will also include guidance regarding relative contingency levels/ranges for probable construction costs (as projects progress from master planning to design and construction) as well as standardized unit item classifications for typical collection and distribution system projects (i.e. standardized form that resembles a bid tabulation). Three copies of the draft Construction Cost Estimate 306 Summary Technical Memorandum will be submitted to IRCDUS for review. One copy of the draft Technical Memorandum will be provided in Portable Document Format (PDF) on a CD. Comments received on the draft Technical Memorandum will be incorporated into the Master Plan. Task 6 Evaluation and Findings Workshop Objective: Conduct a workshop with IRCDUS staff to compare alternatives and select a recommended plan. ATKINS will prepare for and conduct a workshop to go over the findings, alternatives, and recommendations of the tasks supporting the Master Plan. One of the goals of the workshop will be to compare reclaimed water alternative costs and non -cost factors and to select the recommended plan. Preparation for this workshop will include the development of maps, graphics and tables of costs and non -cost factors for the alternatives. The purpose of the workshop will be to select a recommended plan. A one -day workshop with IRCDUS staff will be included. ATKINS will prepare a summary of the workshop noting information presented and decisions made. Task 7 Development of a Comprehensive Master Plan Objective: The Master Plan will compile the system evaluation and planning information from the asset classes into a single document and will include a comprehensive capital improvement plan spanning the asset classes. ATKINS will compile a Master Plan covering IRCDUS 's reclaimed water treatment systems. ATKINS will develop the Master Plan based on the results of the tasks included in this Scope of Work. Subtask 7.1 Draft and Final Version of the Master Plan ATKINS will prepare one draft and the final version of the Master Plan as described in this section. The document will include the following sections: n Executive Summary - The CONSULTANT will prepare an Executive Summary of the Master Plan. ■ Introduction - ATKINS will develop and prepare an introduction that will include a brief outline of the Master Plan, including goals and objectives and brief descriptions of the subsequent sections. n Development of Reclaimed Water Demands -The section will include a summary of the work completed under Task 3 of this Scope of Work. Current and future land use (coordinated with local land plans); development of typical reclaimed water demands; and estimates of future demands and applicable peaking factors at 5 -year, 10 -year, and 20 -year planning horizons. 307 o Development of Construction Cost Estimates - Atkins will develop and prepare this section of the Master Plan. The section will include a summary of the work completed under Task 6 of this Scope of Work. The section will summarize the methodology developed and summary of the "typical" opinions of probable construction costs used in the evaluation of the individual asset class facilities. ■ Wastewater Management - Atkins will develop and prepare this section of the Master Plan. This section will include a description of the IRCDUS 's wastewater treatment facilities. • Reclaimed Water System - Atkins will develop and prepare this section of the Master Plan. This section will include a description of the IRCDUS 's reclaimed system under current and future demands; recommendations for improvements for storage, reclaimed mains, and pumping facilities in 5 -year, 10 -year, and 20 -year planning horizons; opinions of probable construction costs; and prioritized recommended improvements. ▪ Comprehensive Recommendations and Implementation Plan - Atkins will develop a Comprehensive Recommendations and Implementation Plan, which will prioritize the recommended improvements for IRCDUS 's reclaimed water system. Atkins will develop a Comprehensive Recommendations and Implementation Plan by combining the recommendations of the various asset class facilities into a single plan developed to achieve IRCDUS 's overall goals and objectives. o Atkins will develop the recommended plan in sufficient detail to recommend capital improvement projects for the planning period, but with particular emphasis on the first 5 years, the second 5 years and the 10 -year increment thereafter. It is in this task that phasing will be developed for the recommended plan. The hydraulic models will be used to analyze needs in five-year increments. Proposed road improvements will be considered in developing the phasing plan. • Three copies of the Draft Master Plan will be prepared for IRCDUS review. Comments received on the Draft Master Plan will be incorporated into the Final Master Plan. This scope assumes only one revision to the Master Plan will be prepared (one Draft and one Final). Three copies of the final document will be prepared. IRCDUS will consolidate all internal review comments and submit to CONSULTANT. One copy of the final report will be provided in Portable Document Format (PDF) on a CD. Electronic files with pertinent hydraulic pipe model runs and GIS files will be provided. ▪ Upon finalization of the master planning document with CIP development and cost estimates, funding requirements, identification of funding sources, and a rate structure analysis will be completed separately in Phase II of the Reclaimed Water Master Plan. Task 8 Project Management Objective: ATKINS will nzanage the Master Planning effort and update IRCDUS Management and staff on a periodic basis to connnunicate the progress of the project. 308 Consists of the overall project management related to CONSULTANT's internal financial, schedule and status reporting; development of subconsultant scopes; subconsultant contractual matters; interdisciplinary and team communication related to drawings, computer file, and specifications; and review conferences with IRCDUS and agencies and related documentation. ATKINS will perform the following tasks as part of the project management: ✓ Perform general project coordination and management activities, including general administrative activities for this authorization, as well as specific coordination activities with the team members, including IRCDUS and associated key staff members. o Prepare and submit to IRCDUS progress report, project schedules and invoices for this assignment. Progress Reports and updated project schedules will be prepared and submitted to IRCDUS on a monthly basis to advise and highlight the overall progress of the Master Planning activities, as well as identify items completed, and on-going and pending activities. The monthly progress reports will also include a summary description of the pending activities, any potential issues identified, any potential impact to the schedule, any potential change in scope of services, and a summary of information and actions needed by IRCDUS. The monthly progress reports will include percent completes for each task and for the overall project. These reports will be submitted by the second to last Friday of each month. o Conduct general project meetings during the course of the work (with a budget of 6 meetings). III. SCHEDULES AND TIME CONSTRAINTS Within ten days after the execution of the Work Order, the CONSULTANT shall provide a detailed project schedule with start and finish dates. The proposed preliminary schedule, shown below, will commence from the execution of the Work Order and will be updated to include dates. 309 FIGURE 1 IRCDUS Reclaimed Water Master Plan Schedule 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Project Plan and Kickoff Meeting 1. Data Collection 2. GIS Data Gathering and Analysis, Service Area Analysis, and Demand Projections 3. Hydraulic Modeling 4. Review Regulatory Compliance Considerations 5. Development of Construction Cost Estimates 6. Evaluation and Findings Workshop 7. Development of a Comprehensive Master Plan 8: Project Management x x x x x x x x x' x x x x x x x x x 310 IRCDUS Reclaimed Water Master Plan Fixed Fee Tasks Task Project Director Senior Engineer III Engineer 1 Senior Designer 11 Senior GIS Analyst Administrative Assistant Total Hours 1o01ia Billing Rate $ 215.00 S 175.00 S 116.00 S 130.00 S 145.00 6 85.00 Hours Hours Hours Hours Hours ' Hours 0 Project Work Plan and Kickoff Meeting 4 24 12 6 0 8 54 $ 7,912.00 0.1 Work Plan 16 8 6 6 0.2 Kickoff Meeting 4 8 4 2 1 Date Collection 2 4 24 0 0 6 38 5 4,594.00 1.0 Data Collection 2 4 24 6 2 GIS, Service Area, and Demand Projections 10 0 20 0 18 0 48 S 7,080.00 2.1 GIS Data Gathering and Analysis 4 12 10 2.2 Service Area Analysis and Demand Projections 6 8 8 3 Hydraulic Modeling 10 4 86 0 0 30 130 $ 15,376.00 3.1 Hydraulic Models Setup 24 4 3.2 Hydraulic Models Validation 30 2 3.3 Development of Future Model Scenarios 4 24 8 3.4 Technical Memorandum 6 4 8 16 4 Review Regulatory Compliance Considerations 2 18 72 0 0 16 106 S 12,942.00 4.1 Existing Regulations 2 2 24 2 4.2 Existing and Pending Permits 2 6 2 4.3 Future and Pending Regulations 4 16 2 4,4 Contact Stale and Federal Regulators 4 16 2 4.5 Technical Memorandum 4 8 8 5 Development of Construction Cost Estimates 10 0 0 0 4 14 S 2,090.00 5.0 Development of Construction Cost Estimates 10 4 6 Evaluations end Findings Workshop 16 0 0 0 0 15 31 S 4.715.00 8.0 Evaluations and Findings Workshop 16 15 7 Development of a Comprehensive Master Plan 40 40 130 24 0 80 294 S 38,900.00 7.0 Draft and Final Version of the Master Plan 40 40 130 24 60 8 Project Management 8 80 0 0 0 40 128 S 19,120.00 8.0 Project Management 8 80 40 Total Hours 92 178 344 30 18 181 843 Total Labor Amount 5 112,729.00 Subconsultant Labor (KMAC Consulting) S 59.680.00 Total Expenses S 2.500.00 Grand Total Fixed Fee 8 174,909.00 Atkins Labor Page 1 oft 2/11/2019 311 Date: To: 12,G5 Departmental INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF UTILITY SERVICES March 15, 2019 Jason E. Brown, County Administrator From: Vincent Burke, P.E., Director of Utility Services Prepared By: John M. Boyer, P.E., Utilities Engineer Subject: Collier Creek Estates Subdivision Water Assessment Project: Contractor's Final Pay Request & Change Order #1; Resolution IV: Collier Creek Phases 1, 1A, and 16; and, Resolution IV: Collier Creek Phase 2 and Harbor Point (Phase 3) BACKGROUND: On March 14, 2017, the Indian River County (IRC) Board of County Commissioners (BCC) adopted Resolution III confirming the special assessments in connection with the water main extension for Collier Creek Estates Utility Phases 1, la, and lb. Subsequently, on June 13, 2017, the BCC adopted Resolution III for Collier Creek Estates Utility Phase 2 and Harbor Point Utility Phase 3, and directed staff to combine all phases into one bid package and advertise for bids. All phases combined included a total project budget of $1,256,250.00, and: a. A total of two hundred one (201) benefitting parcels as part of the special assessment lien; b. An assessment cost per parcel of $6,250.00; and c. Allowed owners of benefitting properties to finance the assessment cost of $6,250.00 through the County for up to 10 years, payable in ten equal yearly installments at an annual interest rate of 5.00% (Set by the BCC each January). ANALYSIS: Contractor's Final Pay Request: The combined project was advertised on July 12, 2017, bids were opened on August 16, 2017, and the contract awarded on October 3, 2017. The notice to proceed was issued December 11, 2017. The successful bid price of $1,291,717.40 was 2.8% higher than the approved budget. However, since the successful bid price included a $75,000.00 force account, the BCC, in its capacity to oversee the assessment process as the equalizing board per IRC Ordinance Chapter 206 (Special Assessments), authorized staff to move forward with the construction of the water main. The project is now complete and the contractor, Timothy Rose Construction, has applied for final payment. 312 Page 1 of 3 Collier Creek Estates Subdivision (Utility Phases 1, la, lb, & 2) and Harbor Point Subdivision (Utility Phase 3) Petition Water Assessment Project Bid No. 2017-067 To date, Timothy Rose Contracting, Inc. has been paid $1,027,094.99. The attached Pay Request #5 - Final Pay includes the remainder of work complete and all retainage totaling $109,295.03. Also attached is Change Order #1, which details a reduction of the contract price from $1,291,717.40 to $1,136,390.02. Pay Request #5 — Final Pay and Change Order #1 will release the County from further obligations to the contractor. Actual Project Cost: Project costs are summarized in the table below: Item Description Estimated Combined Cost at Resolution III Contract Price Authorized by BCC (October 3, 2017) Actual Project Cost - (Final) Collier Creek Water Assessment $1,256,250.00 $1,291,717.40 $ 1,194,100.80* *The Actual Project Cost includes construction and all surveying, IRC staff time, and permitting/miscellaneous fees (totaling $57,710.78), and is approximately 95% of the Estimated Combined Cost at Resolution III. The resulting cost savings will reduce the per -parcel cost for benefitting properties. There are 201 benefitting properties in the project. Thus, the Final Per -Parcel Cost will be: $ 1,194,100.80 / 201 = $5,940.80 Owners of benefitting properties that pre -paid the assessment amount of $6,250.00 will be refunded the difference. To date, 120 of the 201 benefitting properties have opened accounts and connected to the new IRC Department of Utility Services' (IRCDUS) water system. IRC Interest Rate In January 2019, the BCC approved an interest rate of 5.5%. However, the Collier Creek Water Assessment project was approved, and its construction completed during calendar years 2017 and 2018 while the County's interest rate was set at 5.0%. That interest rate was communicated to the project's residents during public meetings, telephone conversations, etc. Staff therefore recommends the BCC approve Resolution IV with an interest rate of 5.0% for both assessment (per parcel) costs and impact fees. FUNDING: Funds for the project will be derived from the Assessment Fund. Assessment Fund revenues are generated from connection fees paid by the benefitting property owners available in the Utilities assessment fund account. Description Account Number Amount Collier Creek Water Assessment 473-169000-16515 $ 1,194,100.80 C:\Users\legistar\AppData\Local\Temp\BCL Technologies\easyPDF 8\@BCL@580E0855\@BCL@580E0855.docx Page 2 of 3 313 Collier Creek Estates Subdivision (Utility Phases 1, la, lb, & 2) and Harbor Point Subdivision (Utility Phase 3) Petition Water Assessment Project Bid No. 2017-067 RECOMMENDATION: Staff requests authorization from the Board of County Commissioners for the following: a. Approve application for Payment No. 5 — Final Pay in the amount of $109,295.03 to Timothy Rose Contracting and Change Order #1; b. Adopt Resolution IV for Collier Creek Phases 1, 1A, and 1B with a per parcel cost of $5,940.80 and interest rate of 5.0% for assessment costs and impact fees; and c. Adopt Resolution IV for Collier Creek Phase 2 and Harbor Point Phase 3 with a per parcel cost of $5,940.80 and interest rate of 5.0% for assessment costs and impact fees. d. Authorize staff to refund the $309.20 difference in per -parcel cost between Resolution III ($6,250.00) and Resolution IV ($5,940.80) ATTACHMENTS: 1. Pay Application #5 — Final Pay 2. Change Order #1 - Final 3. Resolution IV — Collier Creek Phase 1, 1A, and 1B 4. Resolution IV — Collier Creek Phase 2 and Phase 3 (Harbor Point) C:\Users\legistar\AppData\Local\Temp\BCL Technologies\easyPDF 8\@BCL@580E0855\@BCL@580E0855.docx Page 3 of 3 314 APPLICATION FOR PAYMENT NO. 5 To: Indian River County Department of Utilities Services From: Timothy Rose Contracting Contract: Bid No. 2017-067 Project: Collier Creek Estates OWNER's Contract No. UCP # 4125 For Work accomplished through the date of: 02/14/19 (OWNER) (CONTRACTOR) ENGINEER's Project No. 4125 1 Original Contract Price: $1,291,717.40 2 Net change by Change Orders and Written Amendments (+ or -): $0.00 3 Current Contract Price (1 plus 2): $1,291,717.40 4 Total completed and stored to date $1,136,390.02 5 Retainage (per Agreement): 5% of completed Work: $0.00 10% of stored material: $0.00 Total Retainage: $0.00 6 Total completed to date less retainage (4 minus 5): $1,136,390.02 7 Less previous Application for Payments: $1,027,094.99 8 DUE THIS APPLICATION (6 MINUS 7): $109,295.03 CONTRACTOR'S Certification: The undersigned CONTRACTOR certifies that (1) title to all Work, materials and equipment incorporated in said Work or otherwise listed in or covered by this Application for Payment will pass to OWNER at time of payment free and clear of all Liens, security interests and encumbrances; (2) all Work covered by this Application for Payment is in accordance with the Contract Documents and not defective; and (3) the labor and materials listed on this Application for Payment have been used in the construction of this Work and payment received from the last progress payment has been used to make payments to all subcontractors, laborers, material, men and suppliers except as listed below: Dated 02/25/19 State of FLORIDA County of INDIAN RIVER Subscribed and sworn to before me this 14 day of February, 2019 MY COMMISSION n' F'90457`s s'.,.r :off° EXPIRES: October 03, 20I9 f, Notary Public My Commission expires: 10/03/19 B Timoth Ros ontracting Payment of the above AMOUNT DUE THIS APPLICATION is recommended. Dated 2�uo(20/9 EJCDC No. C -700-E (2002 Edition) By: N,R L.% j-ef t&f4(i9 Prepared by the Engineers Joint Contract Documents Committee and endorsed by The Associated General Contractors of America and the Construction Specification Institute 00800-26 315 Pay Application 5 - Summmary of Values Collier Creek Estates Phases 1, 1A, 18, 2 and Harbor Point Phase 3 Water Assessment Project Item No. Item Description Quantity Measure Scheduled Value Previous Periods This Period Total Complete %Complete Balance to Finish Unit Prke Total Quantity Total Quantity Total Quantity Total Quantity Total 1 Construction Stakeout 1 LS $ 4,200.00 $ 4,200.003 54,200.00 0 50.00 1 54,200.00 100.0% 0 50.00 2 Maintenance of Traffic 1 15 5 25,000.00 5 25,000.00 0.8 520,000.00 0.2 55,000.00 1 525,000.00 100.0% 0 50.00 3 Connect to Existing Main 3 EA 5 4,896.00 $ 14,688.00 3 514,688.00 0 50.00 3 514,688.00 100.0% 0 50.00 4 Wet Tap - 8"x8" w/ 8" RS Tapping Gate Valve 1 EA $ 3,952.00 $ 3,952.00 1 53,952.00 0 50.00 1 53,952.00 100.0% 0 $0.00 5 Install Water Main - 8" C-900 PVC 7,730 LF $ 29.00 $ 224,170.00 6657 5193,053.00 0 50.00 6,657 5193,053.00 86.1% 1,073 531,117.00 6 Install Water Main - 8" DR -31 HOPE (HDD) 890 IF $ 80.00 $ 71,200.00 837 566,960.00 0 50.00 837 566,960.00 94.0% 53 54,240.00 7 Install Water Main - 6" C-900 PVC 4,625 IF $ 27.00 $ 124,875.00 3582 596,714.00 0 $0.00 3,582 596,714.00 77.4% 1,043 528,161.00 8 Install Water Main • 6" OR -11 HOPE (HDD) 330 IF 5 76.00 $ 25,080.00 106 58,056.00 0 50.00 106 58,056.00 32.1% 224 517,024.00 9 Install Water Main - 4" C-900 PVC 2,340 LF 5 20.51 5 47,993.40 1962 540,240.62 0 50.00 1,962 540,240.62 83.8% 378 57,752.78 10 Install Water Main • 4" 09.11 HDPE (HDD) 240 LF $ 55.00 5 13,200.00 228 $12,540.00 0 50.00 228 512,540.00 95.0% 12 5660.00 11 Install r PE Water Main 500 IF $ 21.00 $ 10,500.00 0 50.00 0 50.00 0 $0.00 0,0% S00 510,500.00 12 Install Driveway Bore 82 EA $ 1,980.00 $ 162,360.00 81 5160,380.00 0 50.00 81 5160,380.00 98.8%1 51,980.00 13 Install Gate Valve - 8" w/ Box 10 EA $ 1,878.00 $ 18,78000 10 518,780.00 0 50.00 10 518,780.00 100.0% 0 50.00 14 Install Gate Valve • 6" w/ Box 10 EA $ 1,510.00 5 15,100.00 9 513,590.00 0 50.00 9 513,590.00 90.0% 1 51,510.00 15 Install Gate Valve-4"w/Box 9 EA $ 1,192.00 $ 10,728.00 9 510,728.00 0 50.00 9 510,728.00 100.0% 0 50.00 16 Install Water Service- Single Short 42 EA 5 1,087.00 5 45,654.00 42 545,654.00 0 50.00 42 545,654.00 100.0% 0 50.00 17 Install Water Service - Single Long 43 EA 5 1,637.00 5 70,391.00 43 570,391.00 0 50.00 43 570,391.00 100.015 0 50.00 18 Install Water Service - Double Short 26 EA 5 1,900.00 $ 49,400.00 19 536,100.00 0 50.00 19 536,100.00 73.116 7 513,300.00 19 Install Water Service. Double Long 33 EA $ 2,600.00 5 85,800.00 33 585,800.00 0 50.00 33 585,800.00 100.0% 0 $0.00 20 Install Fire Hydrant Assembly w/ 6" Gate Valve & Box 14 EA 5 5,199.00 5 72,786.00 14 572,786.00 0 50.00 14 572,786.00 100.0% 0 50.00 21 Restoration 13,600 IF $ 2.75 $ 37,400.00 0 50.00 13,600 537,400.00 13,600 537,400.00 100.0% 0 50.00 22 Pressure Testing, Disinfection & Clearance 1 LS $ 9,800.00 $ 9,800.00 1 59,800.00 0 50.00 1 59,800.00 100.0% 0 50.00 23 As•BuIIt Survey 1 15 $ 6,000.00 $ 6,000.00 0 $0.00 1 $6,000.00 1 56,000.00 100.0% 0 50.00 24 Public Construction Bond 1 is $ 12,660.00 $ 12,660.00 1 512,660.00 0 50.00 1 512,660.00 100.0% 0 $0.00 25 Mobilization - See Section 01025 for Maximum Price 1 1.5 5 55,000.00 555,000.00 1 555,000.00 0 50.00 1 555,000.00 100.0% 0 50.00 26 Farce Account1 is $ 75,000.00 539,082.60 1 539,082.60 WCD2-20 install Fire Hydrant Assembly w/ 6" Gate Valve & Box 1 EA $ 5,199.00 $ 5,199.00 1 55,199.00 1 55,199.00 100.0% 0 50.00 WCD 3 -17 Install Water Servke • Single Long (Add) 13 EA $ 1,637.00 $ 21,281.00 13 521,281.00 0 50.00 13 521,281.00 100.0% 0 50.00 WCD 3 - 19 Install Water Servke • Double Long (Add) 1 EA 5 2,600.00 5 2,600.00 3 52,600.00 0 $0.00 l 52,600.00 100.0% 0 50.00 WCD 3 - A Install 4" Bollards 14 EA $ 300.00 5 4,200.00 50.00 14 54,200.00 14 54,200.00 100.0% 0 50.00 WCD 3 • g Remove Water Service • SE Corner 201 Arega Street 1 EA $ 175.00 $ 175.00 50.00 1 5175.00 1 5175.00 100.0% 0 50.00 WCD 4 • A Remove and Replace Sidewalk 51.3 SY $ 48.00 $ 2,462.40 51.3 52,462.40 51.3 52,462.40 100.0% 0 50.00 Original Contract) 51,291,717.40 51,081,152.62 555,237.40 Total Complete: 51,136,390.02 88.0% Amt. Remaining: 5155,327.38 316 00310.3 Change Order #01 — Final PROJECT.: Collier Creek Estates Phases 1, 1A, 1B, 2 and Harbor Point Phase 3 Water Assessment Project DATE OF ISSUANCE: February 22, 2019 OWNER: Indian River County Dept. of Utility Services CONTRACTOR: Timothy Rose Construction OWNER's, Project No.: 2017-067 Reason for Change Order: Adjust contract for Final Pay Request, to include Work Change Directives (WCD) 2 and 3 (attached), add "Remove and Replace Sidewalk," reduce certain unit quantities, and delete the force account. Attachments: CO 1 Itemized Schedule, WCD 2, WCD 3, & WCD 4 CHANGE IN CONTRACT PRICE: Description Amount Original Contract Price $1,291,717.40 Net Increase (Decrease) from previous Change Orders No. : $0 Contract Price prior to this Change Order: $1,291,717.40 Net increase (decrease) of this Change Order: ($155,327.38) Contract Price with all approved Change Orders: $1,136,390.02 ACCEPTED: CONTRACTOR (Signature) Date: Z., 210 lq RECO By: CHANGE IN CONTRACT TIMES Description Time Original Contract Time: Substantial Completion: Final Completion: (days or dates) Net change from previous Change Orders No.: Substantial Completion: Final Completion: (days) Contract Time prior to this Change Order: Substantial Completion: Final Completion: (days or dates) Net increase (decrease) this Change Order: Substantial Completion: Final Completion: (days or dates) Contract Time with all approved Change Orders: Substantial Completion: Final Completion: (days or dates) U ies Engineer (Sig , ure) Date: "6 2OI7 APPROVED: By: OWNER (Signature) Date: F:\U6litiestUTILITY - Engineering\Projects - Assessment Projects1000Assessments_2017_Proposed102_PortionCollierCreek_HarborPoint\Construction Phase\WCD100942 - Change OrderO1.docc 00942-1 317 Change Order #1 - Summary Collier Creek Estates Phases 1, 1A, 1B, 2 and Harbor Point Phase 3 Water Assessment Project Pay Item No. Item Description Quantity Unit of Measure Unit Price Total Price WCD 2 - Add Fire Hydrant WCD 2 - 20 Install Fire Hydrant Assembly w/ 6" Gate Valve & Box 1 EA $ 5,199.00 $ 5,199.00 Total WCD 2: $ 5,199.00 WCD 3 WCD 3 -17 Install Water Service - Single Long (Add) 13 EA $ 1,637.00 $ 21,281.00 WCD 3 -19 Install Water Service - Double Long (Add) 1 EA $ 2,600.00 $ 2,600.00 WCD 3 - A Install 4" Bollards 14 EA $ 300.00 $ 4,200.00 WCD 3 - B Remove Water Service - SE Corner 201 Arega Street 1 EA $ 175.00 $ 175.00 Total WCD 3: $ 28,256.00 WCD 4 WCD 4 - A Remove and Replace Sidewalk 51.3 SY $ 48.00 $ 2,462.40 Total WCD 4: $ 2,462.40 Addition/Deletions 5 Install Water Main - 8" C-900 PVC -1,073 LF $ 29.00 $ (31,117.00) 6 Install Water Main - 8" 0R-11 HDPE (HDD) -53 LF $ 80.00 $ (4,240.00) 7 Install Water Main - 6" C-900 PVC -1,043 LF $ 27.00 $ (28,161.00) 8 Install Water Main - 6" DR -11 HDPE (HDD) -224 LF $ 76.00 $ (17,024.00) 9 Install Water Main - 4" C-900 PVC -378 LF $ 20.51 $ (7,752.78) 10 Install Water Main - 4" DR -11 HDPE (HDD) -12 IF $ 55.00 $ (660.00) 11 Install 2" PE Water Main -500 LF $ 21.00 $ (10,500.00) 12 Install Driveway Bore -1 EA $ 1,980.00 $ (1,980.00) 14 Install Gate Valve - 6" w/ Box -1 EA $ 1,510.00 $ (1,510.00) 18 Install Water Service - Double Short -7 EA $ 1,900.00 $ (13,300.00) 26 Force Account -1 LS $ 75,000.00 $ (75,000.00) Total Additions/Deletions: $ (191,244.78) Total CO #1: -$155,327.38 318 Pay Requests-CollierCreek.xlsx 00310-3 WORK CHANGE DIRECTIVE 02 PROJECT: Collier Creek Estates Phases 1, 1A, 1B, 2 and Harbor Point Phase 3 Water Assessment Project DATE OF ISSUANCE: August 13, 2018 OWNER: IRC Dept. of Utility Services, 1801 27th Street, Vero Beach, 32960 CONTRACTOR: Tim Rose Construction OWNER's Project No.: 2017-067 ENGINEER: IRCDUS CONTRACT FOR: ENGINEER's Project No.: You are directed to proceed with the following change(s): Description: Add fire hydrant to north end of Harbor Pointe Drive. Purpose of Work Directive Change: Add fire hydrant to north end of Harbor Pointe Drive. Attachment(s) (list documents supporting change): N/A. If a claim is made that the above change(s) have affected Contract Price or Contract Time, any claim for a Change Order based thereon will involve one of the following methods of determining the effect of the change(s). Method of determining change in Contract Price: Method of determining change in Contract Time: [ ] Time and Materials [X] Contractor's records 14) Unit Prices [] Cost plus fixed fee Estimated increase (decrease) in Contract Price $5,199.00 . If the change involves an increase, the estimated amount is not to be exceeded without further authorization. [ ] Engineer's records [ ] Other Estimated increase (decrease) in Contract Time 0 days*. If the change involves an increase, the estimated time is not to be exceeded without further authorization. *Substantial Completion Date is August 30, 2018; Final Completion Date is October 1, 2018. Once the Work covered by the directive is completed or final cost and time determined, Contractor should submit documentation for inclusion in a change Order. - THIS IS A DIRECTIVE TO PROCEED WITH A CHANGE THAT MAY AFFECT THE CONTRACT PRICE OR THE CONTRACT TIME. A CHANGE ORDER, IF ANY, SHOULD BE CONSIDERED PROMPTLY. RECOMMENDED: A- ' r OVED: By: N/A By: i ! / Inspector Utilities gineer Date: rate: August 13, 2018 ACCEPTED: By: '.—,----�- Contractor Date: 319 WORK CHANGE DIRECTIVE 03 PROJECT: Collier Creek Estates Phases 1, 1A, 1B, 2 and Harbor Point Phase 3 Water Assessment Project DATE OF ISSUANCE: October 31, 2018 OWNER: IRC Dept. of Utility Services, 1801 27th Street, Vero Beach, 32960 CONTRACTOR: Tim Rose Construction OWNER's Project No.: 2017-067 ENGINEER: IRCDUS CONTRACT FOR: ENGINEER's Project No.: You are directed to proceed with the following change(s): Revise water service unit quantities. Description: Add water services as described on the attached spreadsheet. These items shall be added at their respective unit prices. Add bollards at 7 fire hvrdants and remove water service per proposal. Attachment(s): Spreadsheet, Contractor's Proposal If a claim is made that the above change(s) have affected Contract Price or Contract Time, any claim for a Change Order based thereon will involve one of the following methods of determining the effect of the change(s). Method of determining change in Contract Price: Method of determining change in Contract Time: [ ] Time and Materials [ ] Contractor's records [X] Unit Prices [X] Contractor's Proposal Estimated increase (decrease) in Contract Price $28.256.00 . If the change involves an increase, the estimated amount is not to be exceeded without further authorization. [ ] Engineer's records [X] Owner's Records Estimated increase (decrease) in Contract Time 62 days*. If the change involves an increase, the estimated time is not to be exceeded without further authorization. *Substantial Completion Date is August 30, 2018; Final Completion Date is November 30, 2018. Once the Work covered by the directive is completed or final cost and time determined, Contractor should submit documentation for inclusion in a change Order. THIS IS A DIRECTIVE TO PROCEED WITH A CHANGE THAT MAY AFFECT THE CONTRACT PRICE OR THE CONTRACT TIME. A CHANGE ORDER, IF ANY, SHOULD BE CONSIDERED PROMPTLY. RECOMMENDED: a ' ' ' OVED• By: N/A Inspector Date: ACCEPTED: �. By: Date: /1. h Utili s Engineer te: October 31.2018 .� . Contractor 320 Work Change Directive #3 Collier Creek Estates Phases 1, 1A, 1B, 2 and Harbor Point Phase 3 Water Assessment Project Pay Item No. Item Description Quantity Unit of Measure Unit Price Total Price WCD 3 17 Install Water Service - Single Long (Add) 13 EA $ 1,637.00 $ 21,281.00 19 Install Water Service - Double Long (Add) 1 EA $ 2,600.00 $ 2,600.00 - Install 4" Bollards 14 EA $ 300.00 $ 4,200.00 Remove Water Service - SE Corner 201 Arega- Street 1 EA $ 175.00 $ 175.00 Total WCD 3: $ 28,256.00 Pay Requests-CollierCreek.xlsx 00310-3 321 Timothy Rose Contracting, Incorporated 1360 SW Old Dixie 1-Iwy Suite 106 Vero Beach FL 32962 Phone : 772.564.7800 Email : TimRose7@comcast.net Bill To Indian River County Utilities 1800 27th Street Building B Vero Beach, FL 32960-3365 Invoice Invoice # 6153-155 Ship To: Collier Creek WCD4—.3 Thank you for your business. Total Invoice Amount Payments/Credits Applied Balance Due $4,375.00 $0.00 $4.375.00 322 P.O. No. Payment Terms Invoice Date: Due on receipt 11/1/2018 Quantity Description Unit Price Amount 14 1 Install 2 each - 4" Bollards ® 7 Hydrants Remove Water Service - SE Corner 201 Arega 300.00 175.00 4,200.00 175.00 Thank you for your business. Total Invoice Amount Payments/Credits Applied Balance Due $4,375.00 $0.00 $4.375.00 322 WORK CHANGE DIRECTIVE 04 PROJECT: Collier Creek Estates Phases 1, 1A, 1B, 2 and Harbor Point Phase 3 Water Assessment Project DATE OF ISSUANCE: November 13, 2018 OWNER: IRC Dept. of Utility Services, 1801 27th Street, Vero Beach, 32960 CONTRACTOR: Tim Rose Construction OWNER's Project No.: 2017-067 ENGINEER: IRCDUS CONTRACT FOR: ENGINEER's Project No.: You are directed to proceed with the following change(s): Remove & Replace Sidewalk. Description: Demolish existing and form & pour replacement sidewalk along Easy Street near Wimbrow Dr. Attachment(s): Contractor's Proposal If a claim is made that the above change(s) have affected Contract Price or Contract Time, any claim for a Change Order based thereon will involve one of the following methods of determining the effect of the change(s). Method of determining change in Contract Price: Method of determining change in Contract Time: [ ] Time and Materials [ 1 Contractor's records [ ] Unit Prices [X] Contractor's Proposal Estimated increase (decrease) in Contract Price $2,462.40 . If the change involves an increase, the estimated amount is not to be exceeded without further authorization. [1 [] Engineer's records Owner's Records Estimated increase (decrease) in Contract Time 0 days*. If the change involves an increase, the estimated time is not to be exceeded without further authorization. *Substantial Completion Date is August 30, 2018; Final Completion Date is November 30, 2018. Once the Work covered by the directive is completed or final cost and time determined, Contractor should submit documentation for inclusion in a change Order. THIS IS A DIRECTIVE TO PROCEED WITH A CHANGE THAT MAY AFFECT THE CONTRACT PRICE OR THE CONTRACT TIME. A CHANGE ORDER, IF ANY, SHOULD BE CONSIDERED PROMPTLY. RECOMMENDED: By: N/A By Inspector Date: ACCEPTED: Contractor P OVED: tilities Engineer Date: November 13, 2018 Date: 1 t 13 323 Timothy Rose Contracting, Incorporated 1360 SW Old Dixie Hwy Suite 106 Vero Beach FL 32962 Phone : 772.564.7800 Email : TimRose7@comcast.net Bill To Indian River County Utilities 1800 27th Street Building B Vero Beach, FL 32960-3365 Invoice Invoice # 6153-160 Ship To: Collier Creek IVCD N5 WCD #4 Thank you for your business. Total Invoice Amount Payments/Credits Applied Balance Due $2,462.40 $0.00 $2,462.40 324 P.O. No. Payment Terms Invoice Date: Due on receipt 11/9/2018 Quantity Description Unit Price Amount 51.3 Remove & Replace 10511- 4.311 wide sidewalks - 51.30 Sq Yds 48.00 2,462.40 Thank you for your business. Total Invoice Amount Payments/Credits Applied Balance Due $2,462.40 $0.00 $2,462.40 324 As Built (Final Reso.) Collier Creek Phase 1, to & 18 RESOLUTION NO. 2019- A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, CERTIFYING "AS -BUILT" COSTS IN CONNECTION WITH A WATER MAIN EXTENSION FROM 699 S. EASY STREET TO AND INCLUDING 774 S. EASY STREET; 193 CHELLO AVENUE TO AND INCLUDING 209 CHELLO AVENUE; 100 BECKER AVENUE TO AND INCLUDING 109 BECKER AVENUE; 100 CHARLES AVENUE TO AND INCLUDING 108 CHARLES AVENUE; 738 HOLDEN AVENUE TO AND INCLUDING 786 HOLDEN AVENUE; AND 800 HOLDEN COURT TO AND INCLUDING 807 HOLDEN COURT, WITHIN THE SUBDIVISION OF COLLIER CREEK ESTATES, PHASES 1, 3, 4, 5 AND PORTIONS OF PHASES 2 AND 6, LOCATED WITHIN THE CITY OF • SEBASTIAN, IN INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA; AND SUCH OTHER CONSTRUCTION NECESSITATED BY SUCH PROJECT; PROVIDING FOR FORMAL COMPLETION DATE, AND DATE FOR PAYMENT WITHOUT PENALTY AND INTEREST. WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County ("Board") determined that a water main extension from 699 S. Easy Street to and including 774 S. Easy Street; 193 Chello Avenue to and including 209 Chello Avenue, 100 Becker Avenue to and including 109 Becker Avenue; 100 Charles Avenue to and including 108 Charles Avenue; 738 Holden Avenue to and including 786 Holden Avenue; and 800 Holden Court to and including 807 Holden Court, within the subdivision of Collier Creek Estates, Phases 1, 3, 4, 5 and portions of Phases 2 and 6, located within the City of Sebastian, in Indian River County, Florida are necessary to promote the public welfare of the county; and WHEREAS, on Tuesday, March 14, 2017, the Board held a public hearing at which time and place the owners of property to be assessed appeared before the Board to be heard as to the propriety and advisability of making such improvements; and WHEREAS, after such public hearing was held the Board adopted Resolution No. 2017- 028, which confirmed the special assessment cost of the project to the property specially benefited by the project in the amounts listed in the attachment to that resolution; and WHEREAS, now that the project has been completed, the Director of Utility Services has certified the actual "as -built" cost to be less than the cost in confirming Resolution No. 2017-028, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, as follows: 1. To avoid interest and penalty charges, payment may be made within ninety days after passage of this resolution (Resolution No. 2019- ). F:1Attonney\Naney\DOCS1UTl1. PROJECTS Collier Creek Phase 1, IA it ID . resolution 4 assessment projccl.docx 325 RESOLUTION NO. 2019- 2. Payments bearing interest at the rate of 5.00% per annum may be made in ten annual installments, the first to be made twelve months from the due date. The due date is the date of passage of this resolution. 3. The final assessment roll for the_ project listed in Resolution No. 2017-028 shall be as shown on the attached Exhibit "A." 4. The assessments, as shown on the attached Exhibit "A," shall stand confirmed, and will remain legal, valid, and binding first liens against the property against which such assessments are made until paid. 5. The assessments shown on Exhibit "A," attached to Resolution No. 2017-028, were recorded by the County on the public records of Indian River County, and the lien shall remain prima facie evidence of its validity. The resolution was moved for adoption by Commissioner , and the motion was seconded by Commissioner , and, upon being put to a vote, the vote was as follows: Chairman Bob Solari Vice Chairman Susan Adams Commissioner Joseph E. Flescher Commissioner Tim Zorc Commissioner Peter D. O'Bryan The Chairman thereupon declared the resolution duly passed and adopted this day of , 2019. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA Attest: Jeffrey R. Smith, Clerk of the Circuit Court and Comptroller By By Bob Solari, Chairman Deputy Clerk Approved for form and legal suffi Dylan eingold, County Attorney 2 326 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY — DEPARTMENT OF UTILITY SERVICES COLLIER CREEK — PHASE 1, 1A & 1B WATER ASSESSMENT PROJECT FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL— RESOLUTION 4 Parcel # 31391800005000100001.0 Assessment= _ $5,940.80 Owner BORTOU-FERGUSON, WENDY Secondary Owner #1 Secondary Owner #2 Mailing Address 699 S EASY ST SEBASTIAN FL 32958 Legal COWER CREEK ESTATES PHASE I - BLK A LOT 1 PBl 15-11 Site Address 699 S EASY ST Revision Date : 3/8/2019 Parcel # 31391800005000100002.0 Assessment= $5,940.80 Owner EDWARDS, JOSHUA B & VIVIAN Secondary Owner #1 _ Secondary Owner #2 Mailing Address 196 CHELLO AVE SEBASTIAN FL 32958 Legal COLLIER CREEK ESTATES PHASE 1- BLK A LOT 2 PBI 15-11 Site Address 196 CHELLO AV Revision Date : 3/8/2019 Parcel # 31391800005000100003.0 Assessment= $5,940.80 Owner EBERLE, RICHARD WAYNE and DEANN MARIE Secondary Owner #1 Secondary Owner #2 _ Mailing Address 194 CHELLO AVE - SEBASTIAN FL 32958 - Legal COLLIER CREEK ESTATES PHASE I - UK A LOT 3 PBI 15-11 Site Address 194 CHELLO AV Revision Date : 3/6/2019 EXHIBIT "A" 327 One 10(47 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY — DEPARTMENT OF UTILITY SERVICES COLLIER CREEK — PHASE 1, 1A & 1B WATER ASSESSMENT PROJECT FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL — RESOLUTION 4 Parcel # 31391800005000100004.0 Assessment= $5,940.80 Owner LIVINGSTON, MARK A and ALLISON L Secondary Owner #1 Secondary Owner #2 Mailing Address 193 CHELLO AVE SEBASTIAN FL •32958 Legal COLLIER CREEK ESTATES PHASE 1- BLK A LOT 4 PBI 15-11 Site Address 193 CHELLO AV Revision Date c 3/8/2019 Parcel # 31391800005000100005.0 Assessment= 55,940,80 Owner COLOMBINO FAMILY TRUST Secondary Owner #1 Secondary Owner #2 Mailing Address 1313 PALERMO WAY LANTANA FL 33462 Legal COLLIER CREEK ESTATES PHASE 1- BLK A LOT 5 PBI 15-11 Site Address 195 CHELLO AV Revision Date : 3/8/2019 Parcel # 31391800005000100006.0 Assessment= $5,940.80 Owner LACHOWICZ, GARY A and NICKI LYNN Secondary Owner #1 Secondary Owner #2 Mailing Address 197 CHELLO AVE SEBASTIAN FL 3.2958 Legal COLLIER CREEK ESTATES PHASE 1- BLK A LOT 6 PBI 15-11 Site Address 197 CHELLO AV Revision Date • 3/8/2019 328 Paee 2 of 4i, INDIAN RIVER COUNTY — DEPARTMENT OF UTILITY SERVICES COLLIER CREEK PHASE 1, 1A & 1B WATER ASSESSMENT PROJECT FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL — RESOLUTION 4 Parcel # 31391800005000100007.0 Assessment=_ $5,940.80 Owner FJ WEBB FAMILY LP (1/2) & Secondary Owner #1 WEBB, FRANCIS J (TR) (1/2) Secondary Owner #2 Mailing Address 1744 SOUTH BOWERS RD MILFORD DE 19963 Legal COLDER CREEK ESTATES PHASE I - BLK A LOT 7 PBI 15-11 Site Address 701 S EASY ST Revision Date : 3/8/2019 Parcel # 31391800005000100008.0 Assessment= $5,940.80 Owner EDWARDS, JOSHUA B & VIVIAN Secondary Owner #1 Secondary Owner #2 Mailing Address 196 CHELLO AVE SEBASTIAN FL 32958 Legal COLLIER CREEK ESTATES PHASE I - BLK A LOT 8 P61 15-11 Site Address 703 S EASY ST Revision Date : 3/8/2019 Parcel # 31391800005000100009.0 Assessment= $5,940.80 Owner VERNON, CAROLYN J & _ Secondary Owner #1 VERON, GARY L Secondary Owner #2 Mailing Address 708 S EASY ST SEBASTIAN FL 32958 Legal COLLIER CREEK ESTATES PHASE I - BLK A LOT 9 PBI 15-11 Site Address 705 S EASY ST Revision Date : 3/8/2019 329 Pae 3 of4i INDIAN RIVER COUNTY -- DEPARTMENT OF UTILITY SERVICES COLLIER CREEK — PHASE 1, 1A & 1B WATER ASSESSMENT PROJECT FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL— RESOLUTION 4 Parcel # 31391800005000200001.0 Assessment= 55,940.80 Owner WOLZ, MICHAEL E and SUSAN F .Secondary Owner #1 Secondary Owner #2 Mailing Address 200 CHELLO AVE SEBASTIAN FL 32958 Legal COLLIER CREEK ESTATES PHASE I - BLK B LOT 1 P8115-11 Site Address 200 CHELLO AV Revision Date : 3/8/2019 Parcel # 31391800005000200002.0 Assessment= $5,940.80 Owner BARRINEAU, JOHN T & TAMMY H Secondary Owner #1 Secondary Owner #2 Mailing Address 202 CHELLO AVE SEBASTIAN FL 32958 Legal COLLIER CREEK ESTATES PHASE 1- BLK B LOT 2 PBI 15-11 Site Address 202 CHELLO AV Revision Date : 3/8/2019 Parcel # 31391800005000200003.0 Assessment= $5,940.80 Owner HARRINGTON, ROGER S (LE) and RANNELL L (LE) Secondary Owner #1 HARRINGTON, CHRISTOPHER R _• Secondary Owner #2 HARRINGTON, ROGER 5 JR Mailing Address 204 CHELLO AVE SEBASTIAN FL32958 Legal COLLIER CREEK ESTATES PHASE I - BLK B LOT 3 P13115-11 Site Address 204 CHELLO AV Revision Date : 3/S/2019 330 Palle 4 or 47 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY — DEPARTMENT OF UTILITY SERVICES COLLIER CREEK PHASE 1, 1A & 1B WATER ASSESSMENT PROJECT FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL— RESOLUTION 4 Parcel # 31391800005000200004.0 Assessment= $5,940.80 Owner FORGATCH JOHN D Secondary Owner #1 Secondary Owner #2 Mailing Address 640 KINGFISH RD NORTH PALM BEACH FL 33408 Legal COLLIER CREEK ESTATES PHASE I - BLK B LOT 4 PBI 15-11 Site Address 206 CHELLO AV Revision Date : 3/8/2019 Parcel # 31391800005000200005.0 Assessment= $5,940.80 Owner CRONIN, BRADFORD F and PAULINE T Secondary Owner #1 Secondary Owner #2 Mailing Address 208 CHELLO AVE SEBASTIAN FL 32958 Legal COLLIER CREEK ESTATES PHASE I - BLK B LOT 5 PBI 15-11 Site Address 208 CHELLO AV Revision Date : 3/8/2019 Parcel # 31391800005000200006.0 • Assessment= $5,940.80 Owner HEINZ, H DENNIS and GAIL Secondary Owner #1 Secondary Owner #2 Mailing Address LAKESIDE DR BLOCK ISLAND RI 02827 Legal COLLIER CREEK ESTATES PHASE I -.BLK B LOT 6 PBI 15-11 Site Address 209 CHELLO AV Revision Date : 3/8/2019 331 Paet5 of 47 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY -- DEPARTMENT OF UTILITY. SERVICES COLLIER CREEK — PHASE 1, 1A & 18 WATER ASSESSMENT PROJECT FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL— RESOLUTION 4 Parcel It 31391800005000200007.0 Assessment= $5,940.80 Owner CHIECA, ROBERT and MARIE Secondary Owner #1 SecondaryOwner #2 Mailing Address 207 CHELLO AVE SEBASTIAN FL 32958 Legal COLLIER CREEK ESTATES PHASE I - BLK B LOT 7 PBI 15-11 Site Address 207 CHELLO AV Revision Date : 3/8/2019 Parcel # 31391800005000200008.0 Assessment= $5,940.80 Owner DRESCHER, RICHARD B & ELSE Secondary Owner #1 Secondary Owner #2 Mailing Address 205 CHELLO AVE SEBASTIAN FL 32958 Legal COLLIER CREEK ESTATES PHASE I - BLK B LOT 8 PBI 15-11 Site Address 205 CHELLO AV Revision Date : 3/8/2019 Parcel # 31391800005000200009.0 _ _ _ _ Assessment= $5,940.80 Owner HOFFMAN, BRUCE M and NAHIR Secondary Owner #1 Secondary Owner #2 Mailing Address 203 CHELLO AVE SEBASTIAN FL 32958 Legal COLLIER CREEK ESTATES PHASE! - BLK B LOT 9 MI 15-11 Site Address 203 CHELLO AV Revision Date : 3/8/2019 332 mare 6 of 47 . INDIAN RIVER COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF UTILITY SERVICES COLLIER CREEK PHASE 1, 1A & 1B WATER ASSESSMENT PROJECT FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL— RESOLUTION 4 Parcel # 31391800005000200010.0 Assessment= $5,940.80 Owner MCDERMOTT, JOYCE R (LE) & THOAS M JR Secondary Owner #1 MCDERMOTT, THOAS M J - - Secondary Owner #2 Mailing Address 700 S EASY ST SEBASTIAN FL 32958 Legal COLLIER CREEK ESTATES PHASE I - SLK 8 LOT 10 PBI 1S-11 Site Address 700 S EASY ST Revision Date : 3/8/2019 Parcel # 31391800005000200011.0 Assessment= $5,940.80 Owner DUVALL, MARIE ANGELIQUE Secondary Owner #1 Secondary Owner #2 Mailing Address 702 S EASY ST - - ---- -------- --- SEBASTIAN FL 32958 Legal COLLIER CREEK ESTATES PHASE I - BLK 8 LOT 11 PBI 15-11 Site Address 702 S EASY ST Revision Date : 3/8/2019 Parcel it -- - --- - --- - 31391800005000200012.0 Assessment= $5,940.80 Owner GRACE, PETER T and KATHLEEN M Secondary Owner #1 Secondary Owner #2 Mailing Address 704 5 EASY ST SEBASTIAN FL 32958 Legal COLLIER CREEK ESTATES PHASE I - BLK B LOT 12 PBI 15-11 Site. Address 704 $ EASY ST Revision Date : 3/8/2019 333 Paee7ofa7, INDIAN RIVER COUNTY — DEPARTMENT'OF UTILITY SERVICES COLLIER CREEK — PHASE 1, 1A & 1B WATER ASSESSMENT PROJECT FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL— RESOLUTION 4 Parcel # 31391800005000200013.0 Assessment= $5,940.80 Owner CONLON, JOHN M and BETTY M Secondary Owner #1 Secondary Owner #2 Mailing Address 706 S EASY ST SEBASTIAN FL 32958 Legal COLLIER CREEK ESTATES PHASE I - BLK'B LOT 13 PBI 15-11 Site Address 7.06 S EASY ST Revision Date : 3/8/2019 Parcel # 31391800006000100010.0 Assessment= $5,940.80 Owner FORSTE, ROBERT (LE) & NANCY (LE) & STACY E _ Secondary Owner #1 CLARKE, STACY E Secondary Owner #2 Mailing Address 707 S EASY ST SEBASTIAN FL 32958 Legal COLLIER CREEK ESTATES PHASE TWO - BLK A LOT 10 PBI 15-39 Site Address 707 S. EASY ST Revision Date ; 3/8/2019 Parcel # ------ - --- 31391800006000100011.0 Assessment= $5,940.80 Owner _ THIM MER, JAMES D & MEGAN M Secondary Owner #1 Secondary Owner #2 - Mailing Address 709 S EASY STREET SEBASTIAN FL 32958 Legal COLLIER CREEK ESTATES PHASE TWO - BLK A LOT 11 PBI 15-39 Site Address 709 5 EASY ST Revision Date : 3/8/2019 334 �are8oi47 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY — DEPARTMENT OF UTILITY SERVICES COLLIER CREEK — PHASE 1, 1A & 16 WATER ASSESSMENT PROJECT FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL -- RESOLUTION 4 Parcel # 31391800006000100012.0 Assessment= $5,940.80 Owner THANOMSIN, NINATTHAKAN Secondary Owner #1 Secondary Owner #2 Mailing Address 711 S EASY ST SEBASTIAN FL 32958 Legal COWER CREEK ESTATES PHASE TWO - BLK A LOT 12 PBI 15-39 Site Address 711 S EASY ST Revision Date : 3/8/2019 Parcel # 31391800006000100013.0 Assessment= $5,940.80 Owner ALE55O, BRUCE & MARGARET Secondary Owner #1 Secondary Owner #2 Mailing Address 713 S EASY ST SEBASTIAN FL 32958 Legal COLLIER CREEK ESTATES PHASE TWO - BLK A LOT 13 PBI 15-39 Site Address 713 S EASY ST Revision Date : 3/8/2019 Parcel # 31391800006000100014.0 Assessment= $5,940.80 Owner GEARY, JOHN E and NANCY R Secondary Owner #1 Secondary Owner #2 Mailing Address 715 S EASY ST SEBASTIAN FL 32958 Legal COLLIER CREEK ESTATES PHASE TWO - BLK A LOT 14 PBI 15-39 Site Address 715 S EASY ST Revision Date : 3/8/2019 335 — Pane 9 of 47 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY — DEPARTMENT OF UTILITY SERVICES COLLIER CREEK — PHASE 1, 1A & 1B WATER ASSESSMENT PROJECT FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL — RESOLUTION 4 Parcel # 31391800006000100015.0 Assessment= $5,940.80 Owner KINDLER, KENNETH LEIGH & CHERYL LYNNE Secondary Owner #1 Secondary Owner #2 Mailing Address 717 S EASY ST SEBASTIAN FL 32958 Legal COLLIER CREEK ESTATES PHASE TWO - BLK A LOT 15 PBI 15-39 Site Address 717 S EASY ST Revision Date : 3/8/2019 Parcel # 31391800006000200014.0 Assessment= $5,940.80 Owner LEEDHAM, R W (LE) and MARY (LE) Secondary Owner #1 LEEDMAN, MARY (TR) Secondary Owner #2 LEEDHAM, R W (TR) Mailing Address 708 S EASY ST SEBASTIAN FL 32958 Legal COLLIER CREEK ESTATES PHASE TWO - BLK B LOT 14 PBI 15-39 Site Address 708 S EASY ST Revision Date : 3/8/2019 Parcel # 31391800006000200015.0 Assessment= $5,940.80 Owner HOLMES, CALVIN TRUMAN JR & TAMMY Secondary Owner #1 Secondary Owner #2 Mailing Address 710 S EASY ST SEBASTIAN FL 32958 Legal COWER CREEK ESTATES PHASE TWO - BLK 13 LOT 15 PBI 15-39 Site Address - 710 S EASY ST - Revision Date : 3/8/2019 336 Pan 10_of 47. INDIAN RIVER COUNTY — DEPARTMENT OF UTILITY SERVICES COLLIER CREEK —.PHASE 1, 1A &.1B WATER ASSESSMENT PROJECT FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL— RESOLUTION 4 Parcel # 31391800006000200016.0 Assessment= $5,940.80 Owner WILLIAMS, JACKIE Secondary Owner #1 Secondary Owner #2 Mailing Address 712 S EASY ST SEBASTIAN FL 32958 Legal COLLIER CREEK ESTATES PHASE TWO - BLK 8 LOT 16 PBI 15-39 Site Address 712 S EASY ST Revision Date : 3/8/2019 Parcel # 31391800006000200017.0 Assessment= $5,940.80 Owner NAGY, BELA G JR and ELISSA R Secondary Owner #1 Secondary Owner #2 _ Mailing Address 714 S EASY ST SEBASTIAN FL 32958 Legal COLLIER CREEK ESTATES PHASE TWO - BLK 8 LOT 17 PBI 15-39 Site Address 714 S EASY ST Revision Date : 3/8/2019 Parcel # 31391800006000200018.0 _ Assessment= $5,940.80 Owner ELFORD, JAMES R III and MARY JA NE Secondary Owner #1 Secondary Owner #2 Mailing Address 716 S EASY ST SEBASTIAN FL 32958 Legal COLLIER CREEK ESTATES PHASE TWO - BLK 8 LOT 18 P81 15-39 Site Address 716 S EASY ST Revision Date ; 3/8/2019 337 Pace 11 Mai INDIAN RIVER COUNTY — DEPARTMENT OF UTILITY SERVICES COLLIER CREEK — PHASE 1, 1A & 1B WATER ASSESSMENT PROJECT FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL RESOLUTION 4 Parcel # 31391800007000500019.0 Assessment= $5,940.80 Owner FLEMING, BRUCE W Secondary Owner #1 Secondary Owner #2 Mailing Address 720 S EASY ST SEBASTIAN FL 32958 Legal COWER CREEK ESTATES PHASE THREE - BLK E LOT 19 PBI 15-66 Site Address 720 S EASY ST Revision Date : 3/8/2019 Parcel # 31391800007000600023.0 Assessment= $S,940.80 Owner GALLAGHER, JAMES J & JUD ITH EVANS Secondary Owner #1 Secondary Owner #2 Mailing Address 766 HOLDEN AVE - SEBASTIAN FL 32958 Legal COLLIER CREEK ESTATES PHASE THREE - BLK F LOT 23 PBI 15-66 Site Address 766 HOLDEN AV Revision Date : 3/8/2019 Parcel # 31391800007000600024.0 Assessment= $5,940.80 Owner Confidential Secondary Owner #1 Secondary Owner #2 Mailing Address Legal COLLIER CREEK ESTATES PHASE THREE - BLK F LOT 24 PBI 15-66 Site Address Revision Date : 3/8/2019 338 Pae 12 of 47 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY — DEPARTMENT OF UTILITY SERVICES COLLIER CREEK — PHASE 1, 1A &18 WATER ASSESSMENT PROJECT FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL —.RESOLUTION 4 Parcel # 31391800007000600025.0 Assessment= $5,940.80 Owner ABRAHAM, ANTHONY MICHAEL &JENNIFER BOLSTER Secondary Owner #1 Secondary Owner #2 Mailing Address 121 AMHEARST IN SEBASTIAN FL 32958 — Legal COLLIER CREEK ESTATES PHASE THREE - BLK F LOT 25 PBI 15-66 Site Address 770 HOLDEN AV Revision Date : 3/8/201.9 Parcel # 31391800007000600026.0 _ Assessment= $5,940.80 Owner CLINTON, BRIAN J and JOAN M Secondary Owner #1 _ Secondary Owner #2 Mailing Address 772 HOLDEN AVE SEBASTIAN FL 32958 Legal COLLIER CREEK ESTATES PHASE THREE - BLK F LOT 26 PBI 15-66 Site Address 772 HOLDEN AV Revision Date : 3/8/2019 Parcel # 31391800007000600027.0 Assessment= $5,940.80 Owner HALL, PATRICK and SHARON Secondary Owner #1 Secondary Owner #2 Mailing Address 774 HOLDEN AVE SEBASTIAN FL 32958 Legal COLLIER CREEK ESTATES PHASE THREE - BLK F LOT 27 PBI 15-66 Site Address 774 HOLDEN AV Revision Date : 3/8/2019 339 Paee 13.ofA7, INDIAN RIVER COUNTY— DEPARTMENT OF UTILITY SERVICES COLLIER CREEK — PHASE 1, 1A & 1B WATER ASSESSMENT PROJECT FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL — RESOLUTION 4 Parcel # 31391800007000600028.0 Assessment= $5,940.80 Owner BLOCK, ALFRED L (COTR)(TOK) & JUDITH A (COTR)(TOK) Secondary Owner #1 Secondary Owner #2 Mailing Address 776 HOLDEN AVE _ _ SEBASTIAN FL 32958 Legal COLLIER CREEK ESTATES PHASE THREE - BLK F LOT 28 PBI 15-66 Site Address 776 HOLDEN AV Revision Date : 3/8/2019 Parcel # 31391800007000600029.0 _ Assessment= $5,940.80 Owner KETCHAM, DENNIS TYLER & CYNTHIA LEA _ Secondary Owner #1 Secondary Owner #2 Mailing Address 778 HOLDEN AVE SEBASTIAN FL 32958 Legal COLLIER CREEK ESTATES PHASE THREE - BLK F LOT 29 PBI 15-66 Site Address 778 HOLDEN AV Revision Date : 3/8/2019 Parcel # 31391800007000600030.0 Assessment= $5,940.80 Owner KULLY, JOHN Secondary Owner #1 Secondary Owner #2 Mailing Address 780 HOLDEN AVE SEBASTIAN FL 32958 Legal COLLIER CREEK ESTATES PHASE THREE - BLK F LOT 30 PBI 15-66 Site Address 780 HOLDEN AV Revision Date : 3/8/2019 340 Pave 14 of A7 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY — DEPARTMENT OF UTILITY SERVICES COLLIER CREEK — PHASE 1, 1A & 1B WATER ASSESSMENT PROJECT FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL — RESOLUTION 4 Parcel # 31391800007000600031.0 Assessment= $5,940.80 Owner SPIVAK, MERRILL M (TR)(TOK) Secondary Owner #1 Secondary Owner #2 Mailing Address 782 HOLDEN AVE SEBASTIAN FL 32958 Legal COLLIER CREEK ESTATES PHASE THREE - BLK F LOT 31 PBI 15-66 Site Address 782 HOLDEN AV Revision Date ; 3/8/2019 Parcel # 31391800007000600032.0 Assessment= 55,940.80 Owner BUCHHEIT, GEORGE Secondary Owner #1 Secondary Owner #2 • Mailing Address 784 HOLDEN AVE SEBASTIAN FL 32958 Legal COLLIER CREEK ESTATES PHASE THREE - BLK F LOT 32 PBI 15-66 Site Address 784 HOLDEN AV Revision Date 3/8/2019 Parcel # 31391800007000600033.0 Assessment= $5,940.80 Owner WALKER, JARROD & _ Secondary Owner #1 WALKER, FRANCES Secondary Owner #2 Mailing Address 786 HOLDEN AVE SEBASTIAN FL 32958 Legal COLLIER CREEK ESTATES PHASE THREE - SLK F LOT 33 PBI 15-66 Site Address 786 HOLDEN AV Revision Date ; 3/8/2019 341 Paee 15 of 47 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY — DEPARTMENT OF UTILITY SERVICES COLLIER CREEK —PHASE 1, 1A & 1B WATER ASSESSMENT PROJECT FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL — RESOLUTION 4 Parcel # 31391800007000800010.0 Assessment= $5,940.80 Owner THEIMER, HANSJUERGEN & Secondary Owner #1 KING, USA A Secondary Owner #2 Mailing Address 767 HOLDEN AVE SEBASTIAN FL 32958 Legal COLLIER CREEK ESTATES PHASE THREE - BLK H LOT 10 PBI 15-66 Site Address 767 HOLDEN AV Revision Date : 3/8/2019 Parcel # 31391800007000800011.0 Assessment= $5,940.80 Owner CLARK, GERALD E (LE) and ELEANORE 1 _ Secondary Owner #1 CLARK, ELEANORE L (COTRS) Secondary Owner #2 CLARK, GERALD E (COTRS) Mailing Address 769 HOLDEN AVE SEBASTIAN FL 32958 Legal COLLIER CREEK ESTATES PHASE THREE - BLK H LOT 11 PBI 15-66 Site Address 769 HOLDEN AV Revision Date : 3/8/2019 Parcel # 31391800007000800012.0 Assessment= $5,940.80 Owner BRITTON, LON G & PAMELA S Secondary Owner #1 Secondary Owner #2 Mailing Address 771 HOLDEN AVE SEBASTIAN FL 32958 Legal COLLIER CREEK ESTATES PHASE THREE - BLK H LOT 12 PBI 15-66 Site Address 771 HOLDEN AV Revision Date : 3/8/2019 342 Pape 16.014i INDIAN RIVER COUNTY — DEPARTMENT OF UTILITY SERVICES COLLIER CREEK — PHASE 1, 1A & 1B WATER ASSESSMENT PROJECT FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL— RESOLUTION 4 Parcel # 31391800007000800013.0 Assessment= $5,940.80 Owner KRUPA, STEPHEN Secondary Owner #1 _ Secondary•Owner #2 Mailing Address 773 HOLDEN AVE SEBASTIAN FL 32958 Legal COLLIER CREEK ESTATES PHASE THREE - BLK H LOT 13 PBI 15-66 Site Address 773 HOLDEN AV Revision Date : 3/8/2019 Parcel # 31391800007000800014.0 Assessment= $5,940.80 Owner ALDRICH, JANICE LEE ------ --- - Secondary Owner #1 Secondary Owner #2 Mailing Address 1750' 20TH AVE tIE-7 _ VERO BEACH FL 32960-0425 Legal COLLIER CREEK ESTATES PHASE THREE - BLK H LOT 14 PBI 15-66 Site Address 775 HOLDEN AV Revision Date : 3/8/2019 Parcel # _ 31391800007000800015.0 Assessment= $5,940.80 Owner WELLMAN, JAMES E & CONNIE S Secondary Owner #1 Secondary Owner #2 Mailing Address 783 HOLDEN AVE SEBASTIAN FL 32958 Legal COLLIER CREEK ESTATES PHASE THREE - BLK 11 LOT 15 PBI 15-66 Site Address 783 HOLDEN AV Revision Date : 3/8/2019 343 Pase17of47 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY — DEPARTMENT OF UTILITY SERVICES COLLIER CREEK — PHASE 1, 1A & 1B WATER ASSESSMENT PROJECT FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL— RESOLUTION 4 Parcel # 31391800007000800016.0 Assessment= $5,940.80 Owner ST ANGELO, EDWARD JR Secondary Owner #1 Secondary Owner #2 . Mailing Address 785 HOLDEN AVENUE SEBASTIAN FL 32958 Legal COLLIER CREEK ESTATES PHASE THREE - BLK H LOT 16 PBI 15.66 Site Address 785 HOLDEN AV Revision Date 3/8/2019 Parcel # 31391800007000800017.0 Assessment= $5,940.80 Owner GHIGLIO TTY, HENRY (COTRS)(TOK) and AUDREES Secondary Owner #1 Secondary Owner #2 _ Mailing Address 774 S EASY ST SEBASTIAN FL 32958 Legal COWER CREEK ESTATES PHASE THREE - BLK H LOT 17 PBI 15-66 Site Address 774 S EASY ST Revision Date : 3/8/2019 Parcel # 31391800007000800018.0 Assessment= $5,940.80 Owner STANILKA, TONY and JOYCE L Secondary Owner #1 Secondary Owner #2 Mailing Address 772 S EASY ST SEBASTIAN FL 32958 Legal COLLIER CREEK ESTATES PHASE THREE - BLK H LOT 18 PBI 15-66 Site Address 772 S EASY ST Revision Date : 3/8/2019 344 Pape -18 of A7 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY — DEPARTMENT OF UTILITY SERVICES COLLIER CREEK — PHASE 1, 1A & 1B WATER ASSESSMENT PROJECT FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL— RESOLUTION 4 Parcel # 31391800007000800019.0 Assessment= $5,940.80 Owner HARTMAN, ROBERT E Secondary Owner #1 HARTMAN, ROBIN A Secondary Owner #2 Mailing Address 770 S EASY ST _ SEBASTIAN FL 32958 Legal COLLIER CREEK ESTATES PHASE THREE - BLK H LOT' 19 PBI 15-66 Site Address 770 S EASY ST Revision Date : 3/8/2019 Parcel # 31391800007000900001.0 Assessment= $5,940.80 Owner SUNNYCALB, JAMES & OLIVIA _ Secondary Owner #1 Secondary Owner #2 Mailing Address 721 S EASY ST SEBASTIAN FL 32958 Legal COWER CREEK ESTATES PHASE THREE - BLK I LOT 1 PBI 15-66 Site Address 721 S EASY ST Revision Date : 3/8/2019 Parcel # 31391800007000900022.0 Assessment= $5,940.80 Owner EPISCOPO, ANTHONY Secondary Owner #1 SILVA, VICTORIA S Secondary Owner #2 Mailing Address 40875 N ELIME RD ANTIOCH IL 60002 Legal COLLIER CREEK ESTATES PHASE THREE - BLK I LOT 22 PBI 15-66 Site Address 771$ EASY ST Revision Date : 3/S/2019 345 Page 19 of 47 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY — DEPARTMENT OF UTILITY SERVICES COLLIER CREEK — PHASE 1, 1A & 1B WATER ASSESSMENT PROJECT FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL— RESOLUTION 4 Parcel # 31391800007000900023.0 Assessment= $5,940.80 Owner CHIUSANO, GERALD & JENNIFER R Secondary Owner #1 Secondary Owner #2 Mailing Address 773 S EASY ST SEBASTIAN FL 32958 Legal COLLIER CREEK ESTATES PHASE THREE - BLK 1 LOT 23 PBI 15-66 Site Address 773 S EASY ST Revision Date 3/8/2019 Parcel # 31391800007001000001.0 Assessment= $5,940.80 Owner KAHN, JAMES A Secondary Owner #1 Secondary Owner #2 Mailing Address 801 HOLDEN CT SEBASTIAN FL 32958 Legal COLLIER CREEK ESTATES PHASE THREE - BLK J LOT 1 PBI 15-66 Site Address 801 HOLDEN CT Revision Date : 3/8/2019 Parcel # 31391800007001000002.0 Assessment= $5,940.80 Owner TICE, CHARLES G Secondary Owner #1 Secondary Owner #2 Mailing Address 803 HOLDEN CT SEBASTIAN FL 32958 Legal COLLIER CREEK ESTATES PHASE THREE - BLK J LOT 2 PBI 15-66 Site Address 803 HOLDEN CT Revision Date : 3/8/2019 346 Pae 20 0E47 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY - DEPARTMENT OF UTILITY SERVICES COLLIER CREEK - PHASE 1, 1A & 1B WATER ASSESSMENT PROJECT FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL RESOLUTION 4 Parcel # 31391800007001000003.0 Assessment= $5,940.80 Owner LARRABEE, PETER N & DIANE C Secondary Owner #1 Secondary Owner #2 Mailing Address 805 HOLDEN CT SEBASTIAN FL 32958 Legal COLLIER CREEK ESTATES PHASE THREE - BLK J LOT 3 PBI 15-66 Site Address 805 HOLDEN Cr Revision Date : 3/8/2019 Parcel # 31391800007001000004.0 Assessment= $5,940.80 Owner CALVERT, WILLIAM DEAN and JENNIFER MARI Secondary Owner #1 - - Secondary Owner #2 Mailing Address 807 HOLDEN CT SEBASTIAN FL 32958 Legal COLLIER CREEK ESTATES PHASE THREE - BLK J LOT 4 PBI 15-66 Site Address 807 HOLDEN CT Revision Date ; 3/8/2019 Parcel # 31391800007001000005.0 Assessment= $5,940.80 Owner MCEWEN, MITCH and ROBIN Secondary Owner #1 Secondary Owner #2 Mailing Address 806 HOLDEN Cr SEBASTIAN FL 32958 Legal COLLIER CREEK ESTATES PHASE THREE - BLK J LOT 5 P81 15-66 Site Address 806 HOLDEN CT Revision Date : 3/8/2019 347 Paee.21 of 47, INDIAN RIVER COUNTY — DEPARTMENT OF UTILITY SERVICES COLLIER CREEK — PHASE 1, 1A & 1B WATER ASSESSMENT PROJECT FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL-= RESOLUTION 4 Parcel # 31391800007001000006.0 _ Assessment= $5,940.80 Owner ROSS, SCOTT and DONNA Secondary Owner #1 Secondary Owner #2 Mailing Address 804 HOLDEN COURT SEBASTIAN FL 32958 Legal COLLIER CREEK ESTATES PHASE THREE - BLK J LOT 6 PBI 15-66 Site Address 804 HOLDEN CT Revision Date : 3/8/201.9 Parcel IS 31391800007001000007.0 Assessment= $5,940.80 Owner GIRAN, KAREN MARIE Secondary Owner #1 Secondary Owner #2 Mailing Address 802 HOLDEN CT SEBASTIAN FL 32958 Legal COLLIER CREEK ESTATES PHASE THREE - BLK 1 LOT 7 PBI 15-66 Site Address 802 HOLDEN CT Revision Date : 3/8/2019 Parcel # 31391800007001000008.0 Assessment= $5,940.80_ Owner PACOWSKI, ROSTISIAW (LE) & ANNE Y (LE) Secondary Owner #1 KORZENIOWSKI, ELIZABETH SKINNER, EMILY) Secondary Owner #2 MULKERRIN, KRISTEN SKINNER, MATTHEW A Mailing Address 800 HOLDEN CT - ------ -- -- - SEBASTIAN FL 32965 Legal COLLIER CREEK ESTATES PHASE THREE - BLK J LOT 8 PBI 15-66 Site Address 800 HOLDEN CT Revision Date : 3/8/2019 348 Pase 7z of_47d INDIAN RIVER COUNTY — DEPARTMENT OF UTILITY SERVICES COLLIER CREEK — PHASE 1, 1A & 1B WATER ASSESSMENT PROJECT FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL — RESOLUTION 4 Parcel # 31391800008000600017.0 Assessment= $5,940.80 Owner HAWS, FRANKLIN and ANITA V Secondary Owner #1 Secondary Owner #2 Mailing Address 754 HOLDEN AVE SEBASTIAN FL 32958 Legal COLLIER CREEK ESTATES PHASE FOUR - BLK F LOT 17 P81 16-26 Site Address 754 HOLDEN AV Revision mate : 3/8/2019 Parcel # 31391800008000600018.0 Assessment= $5,940.80 Owner PASLEY, MICHAEL CHRISTOPHER Secondary Owner #1 Secondary Owner #2 Mailing Address 756 HOLDEN AVE SEBASTIAN FL 32958 Legal COLLIER CREEK ESTATES PHASE FOUR - BLK F LOT 18 PBI 16-26 Site Address 756 HOLDEN AV Revision Date : 3/8/2019 Parcel # 31391800008000600019.0 Assessment= $5,940.80 Owner S_ HA RLA ND, JOSEPH T & DEANA M Secondary Owner #1 Secondary Owner #2 Mailing Address 758 HOLDEN AVE SEBASTIAN FL 32958 Legal COLLIER CREEK ESTATES PHASE FOUR - BLK F LOT 19 PBI 16-26 Site Address 758 HOLDEN AV Revision Date : 3/8/2019 349 Pae 23 of 471 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY — DEPARTMENT OF UTILITY SERVICES COLLIER CREEK — PHASE 1, 1A & 1B WATER ASSESSMENT PROJECT FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL — RESOLUTION 4 Parcel # 31391800008000600020.0 Assessment= $5,940.80 Owner BRUNELLE, DAVID P and SANDRA M Secondary Owner #1 Secondary Owner #2 Mailing Address 762 HOLDEN AVE SEBASTIAN FL 32958 Legal COLLIER CREEK ESTATES PHASE FOUR - BLK F LOTS 20 & 21 PBI 16-26 Site Address 762 HOLDEN AVE Revision Date : 3/8/2019 Parcel # 31391800008000600022.0 Assessment= $5,940.80 Owner CARROLL, TERRI Secondary Owner #1 Secondary Owner #2 Mailing Address 764 HOLDEN AVE SEBASTIAN FL 32958 Legal COLLIER CREEK ESTATES PHASE FOUR - BLK F LOT 22 PBI 16-26 Site Address 764 HOLDEN AV • Revision Date ; 318/2019 Parcel # 31391800008000700001.0 Assessment= $5,940.80 Owner WALDRON, MEGAN & _ Secondary Owner #1 DALLY, PATRICIA Secondary Owner #2 Mailing Address 100 CHARLES AVE SEBASTIAN FL 32958 Legal COLLIER CREEK ESTATES PHASE FOUR - BLK G LOT 1 PBI 16-26 Site Address 100 CHARLES AV Revision Date : 3/8/2019 350 Paee 24 of 4i INDIAN RIVER COUNTY — DEPARTMENT OF UTILITY SERVICES COLLIER CREEK — PHASE 1, 1A & 16 WATER ASSESSMENT PROJECT FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL — RESOLUTION 4 Parcel # 31391800008000700002.0 Assessment= $5,940.80 Owner BALDASSANO, PAUL A JR (TR)(TOK) Secondary Owner #1 Secondary Owner #2 Mailing Address 102 CHARLES AVE SEBASTIAN FL 32958 Legal COLLIER CREEK ESTATES PHASE FOUR - BLK G LOT 2 PBI 16-26 Site Address 102 CHARLES AV Revision Date : 3/8/2019 Parcel # 31391800008000700003.0 Assessment= $5,940.80 Owner O'DEA, MICHAEL D and MARGARET P Secondary Owner #1 Secondary Owner #2 Mailing Address 104 CHARLES AVE SEBASTIAN FL 32958 Legal COLLIER CREEK ESTATES PHASE FOUR - BLK G LOT 3 PBI 16-26 Site Address 104 CHARLES AV Revision Date ; 3/8/2019 Parcel # 31391800008000700004.0 Assessment= $5,940.80 Owner FOY, ANDREW J (LE) Secondary Owner #1 FOY, ANDREW J Secondary Owner #2 GUILIANO, ANN MARIE Mailing Address 106 CHARLES AVE SEBASTIAN FL 32958 Legal COLLIER CREEK ESTATES PHASE FOUR - BLK G LOT 4 PBI 16-26 Site Address 106 CHARLES AV . Revision Date : 3/8/2019 351 Paee-2S of 47 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY — DEPARTMENT OF UTILITY SERVICES COLLIER CREEK — PHASE 1, 1A & 1B WATER ASSESSMENT PROJECT FINAL ASSESSMENT, ROLL — RESOLUTION 4 Parcel # 31391800008000700005.0 Assessment= $5,940.80 Owner QIZILBAS_ H , ALI A & ZAHIDA Secondary Owner #1 _ Secondary Owner #2 Mailing Address 108 CHARLES AVE SEBASTIAN FL 32958 Legal COLLIER CREEK ESTATES PHASE FOUR - BLK G LOT 5 PBI 16-26 Site Address 108 CHARLES AV Revision Date : 3/8/2019 Parcel # 31391800008000800001.0 Assessment= $5,940.80 Owner PAPARIAN, RAYMOND P JR & Secondary Owner #1 FIDRE, JEAN M Secondary Owner r #2 Mailing Address 123 INDIAN TRAIL WAKEFIELD RI 02879 Legal COLLIER CREEK ESTATES PHASE FOUR - BLK H LOT 1 P81 16-26 Site Address 101 CHARLES AV Revision Date : 3/8/201.9 Parcel # 31391800008000800002.0 Assessment= $5,940.80 Owner HUDON, ROBERT and GINETTE Secondary Owner #1 Secondary Owner #2 Mailing Address 103 CHARLES AVE SEBASTIAN FL 32958 Legal COLLIER CREEK ESTATES PHASE FOUR - BLK H LOT 2 PBI 16-26 z Site Address 103 CHARLES AV Revision Date : 3/8/2019 352 Pave 26 of 47. INDIAN RIVER COUNTY — DEPARTMENT OF UTILITY SERVICES COLLIER CREEK — PHASE 1, 1A & 18 WATER ASSESSMENT PROJECT FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL— RESOLUTION 4 Parcel # 31391800008000800003.0 Assessment= $5,940.80 Owner BUCKINGHAM, DONALD C and KYONG C Secondary Owner #1 Secondary Owner #2 Mailing Address :105 CHARLES AV SEBASTIAN FL 32958 Legal COLLIER CREEK ESTATES PHASE FOUR - IRK H LOT 3 PBI 16-26 Site Address 105 CHARLES AV Revision Date : 3/8/2019 Parcel # 31391800008000800004.0 Assessment= $5,940.80 Owner RIZWI, TABASSUM Secondary Owner #1 Secondary Owner #2 Mailing Address 8540 SEACREST -- -- --- - ------- VERO BEACH FL 32963 _ Legal COLLIER CREEK ESTATES PHASE FOUR - BLK H LOT 4 P81 16-26 Site Address 107 CHARLES AV Revision Date : 3/8/2019 Parcel # 31391800008000800005.0 Assessment= $5,940.80 Owner LEWIN, GILBERT (LE) & LEIGH C (LE) Secondary Owner #1 LEWIN, GILBERT R (TRS) & LEIGH C (TRS) Secondary Owner #2 _ Mailing Address 757 HOLDEN AVE SEBASTIAN FL 32958 _ Legal COLLIER CREEK ESTATES PHASE FOUR - UK H LOT 5 PBI 16-26 Site Address 757 HOLDEN AV Revision pate • 3/8/2019 353 Paee 27 of 47 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY — DEPARTMENT OF UTILITY SERVICES COLLIER CREEK — PHASE 1, 1A & 1B WATER ASSESSMENT PROJECT FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL -- RESOLUTION 4 Parcel # 31391800008000800006.0 Assessment= $5,940.80_ Owner STULTS, JOHN F & CHERYL L Secondary Owner #1 Secondary Owner #2 Mailing Address 759 HOLDEN AVE SEBASTIAN FL 32958 Legal COLLIER CREEK ESTATES PHASE FOUR - BLK H LOT 6 P81 16-26 Site Address 759 HOLDEN AV Revision Date : 3/8/2019 Parcel # 31391800008000800007.0 Assessment= $5,940.80 Owner MATHISEN, NORMAN A (TRS)(TOK) & CHRISTINE (TRS)(TOK) Secondary Owner #1 Secondary Owner #2 Mailing Address 761 HOLDEN AVE SEBASTIAN FL 32958 Legal COLLIER CREEK ESTATES PHASE FOUR - BLK H LOT 7 PBI 16-26 Site Address 761 HOLDEN AV Revision Date : 3/8/2019 Parcel # 31391800008000800008.0 Assessment= $5,9.40.8.0 Owner EDWARDS, RICHARD H & Secondary Owner #1 EDWARDS, PATRICIA L _ Secondary Owner #2 Mailing Address 763 HOLDEN AVE SEBASTIAN FL 32958 Legal COLLIER CREEK ESTATES PHASE FOUR - BLK H LOT 8 P81 16-26 Site Address 763 HOLDEN AV Revision Date : 3/8/2019 354 Paee 28 of 47. INDIAN RIVER COUNTY — DEPARTMENT OF UTILITY SERVICES COLLIER CREEK — PHASE 1,1A & 18 WATER ASSESSMENT PROJECT FINAL ASSESSIVIENT ROLL—'RESOLUTION 4 Parcel # 31391800008000800009.0 Assessment= $5,940.80 Owner CUMMINGS, CAROL A (LE) Secondary Owner #1 CUMMINGS, ARNOLD 8 (COTR) Secondary Owner #2 CUMMINGS, CAROL (COTR) Mailing Address 765 HOLDEN AVE SEBASTIAN FL 32958 Legal COLLIER CREEK ESTATES PHASE FOUR - BLK H LOT 9 PBI 16-26 Site Address 765 HOLDEN AV Revision Date : 3/8/2019 Parcel # 31391800008000800020.0 Assessment= $5,940.80 Owner CLUTTS, MELVIN E and NANCY B Secondary Owner #1 Secondary Owner #2 Mailing Address 768 S EASY ST SEBASTIAN FL 32958 Legal COLLIER CREEK ESTATES PHASE FOUR - BLK H LOT 20 PBI 16-26 Site Address 768 S EASY ST Revision Date : 2/8/2019 Parcel # 31391800008000800021.0 Assessment= $5,940.80 Owner SIMCHICK, EDWARD M (LE) & DALE IRENE (LE) Secondary Owner #1 SIMCHICK, EDWARD ALEXEY Secondary Owner #2 Mailing Address 766 S EASY ST SEBASTIAN FL 32958 Legal COLLIER CREEK ESTATES PHASE FOUR - BLK H LOT 21 PBI 16-26 Site Address 766 S EASY ST . Revision Date : 3/8/2.019 355 Paee 29 of47 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY — DEPARTMENT OF UTILITY SERVICES COLLIER CREEK --- PHASE '1,1A & 1B WATER ASSESSMENT PROJECT FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL— RESOLUTION 4 Parcel # _ 31391800008000800022.0 _ _ Assessment= $5,940.80 Owner BROWN, DORIS 1 (TR) Secondary Owner #1 Secondary Owner #2 Mailing Address 764 S EASY ST SEBASTIAN FL 32958 Legal COLLIER CREEK ESTATES PHASE FOUR - BLK H LOT 22 PBI 16-26 Site Address 764 S EASY ST Revision Date : 3/8/2019 Parcel # 31391800008000800023.0 Assessment= $5,940.80 _ Owner WHITMORE, HOWARD Secondary Owner #1 Secondary Owner #2 Mailing Address 950 GREENBRAIR AVE SEBASTIAN FL 32958 Legal COLLIER CREEK ESTATES PHASE FOUR - BLK H LOT 23 PBI 16-26 • Site Address 762 S EASY ST Revision Date : 3/8/2019 Parcel # 31391800008000800024.0 Assessment= $5,940.80 Owner HUMPHREY, MICHELLE DAWSON and DAVID STANLEY III Secondary Owner #1 Secondary Owner #2 Mailing Address 6240 E MIRROR LAKE DR #207 SEBASTIAN FL 32958 Legal COLLIER CREEK ESTATES PHASE FOUR - BLK H LOT 24 PBI 16-26 Site Address 760 S EASY ST Revision Date : 3/8/2019 356 Daae 30 of 47, INDIAN RIVER COUNTY — DEPARTMENT OF UTILITY SERVICES COLLIER CREEK — PHASE 1, 1A & 1B WATER ASSESSMENT PROJECT FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL -- RESOLUTION 4 Parcel # 31391800008000900013.0 Assessment= $5,940.80 Owner VANCE, STEPHEN and CINDY Secondary .Owner #1 Secondary Owner #2 Mailing Address 753 S EASY ST SEBASTIAN FL 32958 Legal COLLIER CREEK ESTATES PHASE FOUR - BLK I LOT 13 PBI 16-26 Site Address 753 S EASY ST Revision Date : 3/8/2019 Parcel # 31391800008000900014.0 Assessment= $5,940.80 Owner CANNON, MARK B & LISA ANNE Secondary Owner #1 Secondary Owner #2 Mailing Address 755 S EASY ST SEBASTIAN FL 32958 Legal COLLIER CREEK ESTATES PHASE FOUR - BLK I LOT 14 PBI 16-26 Site Address 755S EASY ST Revision Date : 3/8/2019 Parcel # 31391800008000900015.0 Assessment= $5,940.80 Owner HALL, CALVIN & SHIRLEY Secondary Owner #1 _ Secondary Owner #2 • Mailing Address 9127 NW 41ST MANOR CORAL SPRINGS FL 33065 Legal COLLIER CREEK ESTATES PHASE FOUR - BLK I LOT 15 PBI 16-26 Site Address 757 S EASY ST Revision Date : 3/8/2019 357 Pace 31of 47 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY — DEPARTMENT OF UTILITY SERVICES COLLIER CREEK — PHASE 1, 1A & 1B WATER ASSESSMENT PROJECT FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL — RESOLUTION 4 Parcel # 3139180000800.0900016.0 _ Assessment= $5,940.80 Owner COHN, ROBERT D (LE) and SHIRLEY.' (L Secondary Owner #1 COHN, ROBERT Secondary Owner #2 COHN, SHIRLEY JEAN Mailing Address 759 S EASY ST SEBASTIAN FL 32958 Legal COLLIER CREEK ESTATES PHASE. FOUR - BLK I LOT 16 PBI 16-26 Site Address 759 S EASY ST Revision Date : 3/8/2019 Parcel # _ 31391800008000900017.0 Assessment= $5,940.80 Owner DANGER, BRUNO P and LISA M Secondary Owner #1 Secondary Owner #2 Mailing Address 761 S EASY ST SEBASTIAN FL 32958 Legal COLLIER CREEK ESTATES PHASE FOUR - BLK I LOT 17 PBI 16-26 Site Address 7615 EASY ST Revision Date : 3/8/2019 Parcel # 31391800008000900018.0 Assessment= $5,940.80 Owner SERVICE, PAUL Secondary Owner #1 Secondary Owner #2 Mailing Address PO BOX 94 PORTJERVIS NY 12771 Legal COLLIER CREEK ESTATES PHASE FOUR - BLK 1 LOT 18 PBI 16-26 Site Address 763 S EASY ST Revision Date 3/8/2019 358 Pae.e 32 of 47, INDIAN RIVER COUNTY — DEPARTMENT OF UTILITY SERVICES COLDER CREEK — PHASE 1, 1A & 18 WATER ASSESSMENT PROJECT FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL — RESOLUTION 4 Parcel # 31391800008000900019.0 Assessment= $5,940.80 Owner BUNNELL, JAMES R & TINA K Secondary Owner #1 _ _ Secondary Owner #2 Mailing Address 765 S EASY ST SEBASTIAN FL 32958 Legal COLLIER CREEK ESTATES PHASE FOUR - BLK I LOT 19 PBI 16-26 Site Address 765 S EASY ST Revision Date : 3/8/2019 Parcel # 31391800008000900020.0 Assessment= 65,940.80 Owner KORONA, ALFRED & GRACE Secondary Owner #1 Secondary Owner #2 _ Mailing Address — 767 S EASY ST v . SEBASTIAN FL 3295$ Legal COLLIER CREEK ESTATES PHASE FOUR - BLK I LOT 20 PBI 16-26 • Site Address 767 S EASY ST Revision Date 3/8/2019 Parcel # 31391800008000900021.0 Assessment= $5,940.80 Owner JOHNSON, NANCY C (TR) Secondary Owner #1 Secondary Owner #2 Mailing Address _917 FRANCISCAN AVE SEBASTIAN FL 32958 Legal COLLIER CREEK ESTATES PHASE FOUR - BLK 1 LOT 21 PBI 16-26 Site Address 769 S EASY ST Revision Date : 3/8/2019 359 Paee-3333ot47 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY — DEPARTMENT OF UTILITY SERVICES COLLIER CREEK — PHASE 1, 1A & 1B WATER ASSESSMENT PROJECT FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL., RESOLUTION 4 Parcel # 31391800009000500020.0 Assessment= $5,940.80 Owner LAMACCHIA, FRANK R & DOREEN I Secondary Owner #1 Secondary Owner #2 Mailing Address 722 S EASY ST SEBASTIAN FL 32958 Legal COLLIER CREEK ESTATES PHASE FIVE - BLK E LOT 2Q PBI 17-28 Site Address 722 5 EASY ST Revision Date : 3/8/2019 Parcel # 31391800009000500021.0 Assessment= $5,940.80 Owner CHATFIELD, RICHARD R & KIM Secondary Owner #1 Secondary Owner #2 Mailing Address 441 CANDLE AVE SEBASTIAN FL 32958 Legal COLLIER CREEK ESTATES PHASE FIVE - BLK E LOT 21 PBI 17-28 Site Address 724 5 EASY ST Revision Date : 3/8/2019 Parcel # 31391800009000500022.0 Assessment= $S,940.80 Owner MEES, LILLIANA B & VIRGINIA A Secondary Owner #1 FORSYTH,-VIRGINIA A Secondary Owner #2 Mailing Address 726 S EASY ST SEBASTIAN FL32958 Legal COLLIER CREEK ESTATES PHASE FIVE - BLK E LOT 22 PBI 17-28 Site Address 726 S EASY ST Revision Date : 3/8/2019 360 Paee 39 of_47, INDIAN RIVER COUNTY — DEPARTMENT OF UTILITY SERVICES COLLIER CREEK — PHASE 1, 1A & 1B WATER ASSESSMENT PROJECT FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL— RESOLUTION 4 Parcel # 31391800009000500023.0 Assessment= $S,940 80 Owner MOLNAR, CHRISTOPHER ANDREW Secondary Owner #1 Secondary Owner #2 Mailing Address 16900 SW 276 STREET _ HOMESTEAD FL 33301 Legal COLLIER CREEK ESTATES PHASE FIVE - BLK E LOT 23 PBI 17-28 Site Address 728 S EASY ST Revision Date : 3/8/2019 Parcel # 31391800009000500024.0 Assessment= $5,940.80 Owner DAVENPORT, MICHELE SULLIVAN Secondary Owner #1 Secondary Owner #2 Mailing Address 556 SOUTH WATERLOO RD DEVON P A 19333 Legal COLLIER CREEK ESTATES PHASE FIVE - BLK E LOT 24 PBI 17-28 Site Address 730 S EASY ST Revision Date : 3/8/2019 Parcel # 31391800009000500025.0 Assessment= $5,940__.80 Owner FAGNANT, ALDA P & JAMES Secondary Owner #1 Secondary Owner #2 Mailing Address 732 S EASY ST SEBASTIAN FL 32958 Legal COLLIER CREEK ESTATES PHASE FIVE - BLK E LOT 25 PBI 17-28 Site Address 732 S EASY ST Revision Date : 3/8/2019 361 Paae-3S of_47. INDIAN RIVER COUNTY— DEPARTMENT OF UTILITY SERVICES COLLIER CREEK — PHASE 1, 1A & 1B WATER ASSESSMENT PROJECT FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL— RESOLUTION 4 Parcel It 31391800009000500026.0 Assessment= $5,940.80 Owner RUNYON, JAMES A and MIRIAM C Secondary Owner #1 Secondary Owner #2 Mailing Address_ 734 S EASY ST SEBASTIAN FL 32958 Legal COLLIER CREEK ESTATES PHASE FIVE - BLK E'LOT 26 PBI 17-28 Site Address 734 S EASY ST Revision Date : 3/8/2019 Parcel # 31391800009000500027.0 Assessment= _ $5,940.80 Owner HOWARD, NORMAN J ill & _ Secondary Owner #1 HOWARD, NORMAN J JR Secondary Owner #2 • Mailing Address 738 S EASY ST SEBASTIAN FL 32958 Legal COLLIER CREEK ESTATES PHASE FIVE - BLK E LOT 27 PBI 17-28 Site Address 736 S EASY ST Revision Date : 318/2019 Parcel # 31391800009000500028.0 Assessment= _ $5,940.80 Owner HOWARD, NORMAN JACKSON III (TR) Secondary Owner #1 JOINES-HOWARD, LINDA JOYCE (TR) Secondary Owner #2 Mailing Address 738 S EASY ST SEBASTIAN FL 32958 Legal COLLIER CREEK ESTATES PHASE FIVE - BLK E LOT 28 P61 17-28 Site Address 738 S EASY ST Revision Date : 3/8/2019 362 Pace 36 of 47 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY — DEPARTMENT OF UTILITY SERVICES COLLIER CREEK PHASE 1, 1A & 1B WATER ASSESSMENT PROJECT FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL— RESOLUTION 4 4- 1114' Parcel # 31.391800009000500029.0 Assessment= $5,940.80 Owner O'KEEFE, WILLIAM E and BARBARA J _ Secondary Owner #1 Secondary Owner#2 Mailing Address 740 S EASY. ST SEBASTIAN FL 32958 • Legal .COLLIER CREEK ESTATES PHASE FIVE - BLK E LOT 29 PBI 17-28— Site Address 740 S EASY ST Revision Date 3/8/2019 Parcel # 313918000090.0.0500030.0 Assessment= $5,940.80 Owner GILL, WALTER 0 and GAIL M Secondary Owner #1 Secondary Owner #2 Mailing Address 742 S EASY ST SEBASTIAN FL32958 Legal COLLIER CREEK ESTATES PHASE FIVE - BLK E LOT 30 PBI 17-28 Site Address 742 S EASY ST Rovision Date 3/8/2019 Parcel # 31391800009000600001.0 Assessment= $5,940.80 OWner DESAI, SURESH R & (TR)(TOK)& _ Secondary Owner #1 DESIA, MINAXI S Secondary Owner #2 , Mailing Address 100 BECKER AVE SEBASTIAN FL 32958 Legal COLLIER CREEK ESTATES PHASE FIVE - BLK F LOT 1 P13117-28 Site Address 100 BECKER AV Revision Date : 3/8/2019 363 pace 37 of 47 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY — DEPARTMENT OF UTILITY SERVICES COLLIER CREEK = PHASE 1, 1A & 1B WATER ASSESSMENT PROJECT FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL — RESOLUTION 4 Parcel # 31391800009000600002.0 Assessment= $5,940.80 Owner TORTORELLO, PETER Secondary Owner #1 Secondary Owner #2 Mailing Address 102 BECKER AVE SEBASTIAN FL 32958 Legal COLLIER CREEK ESTATES PHASE FIVE - BLK F LOT 2 PBI 17-28 Site Address 102 BECKER AV Revision Date 3/$/2019 Parcel # 31391800009000600003.0 _ Assessment= $5,940.80 Owner MARCELLINO, PAUL and JESSIE ANN Secondary Owner #1 Secondary Owner #2 Mailing Address 104 BECKER AVE _ SEBASTIAN FL 32958 Legal COLLIER CREEK ESTATES PHASE FIVE - BLK F LOT 3 P01 17-28 Site Address 104 BECKER AV Revision Date : 3/8/201.9 Parcel # 31391800009000600004.0 Assessment= $5,9.40.80 Owner DURING, DONALD G and PATRICIA A Secondary Owner #1 Secondary Owner#2 Mailing Address 15 JAMES LN - - LEVITTOWN NY 11756 Legal COLLIER CREEK ESTATES PHASE FIVE - BLK F LOT 4 PBI 17-28 Site Address 106 BECKER AV Revision Date : 3/8/2019 364 Pale 38 of 47 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY — DEPARTMENT OF UTILITY SERVICES COLLIER CREEK — PHASE 1, 1A & 1B WATER ASSESSMENT PROJECT FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL — RESOLUTION 4 Parcel # 31391800009000600005.0 Assessment= $5,940.80 Owner FORSTER, ALAN J & Secondary Owner #1 FORSTER, CHRISTINA L Secondary Owner #2 Mailing Address 745 HOLDEN'AVE SEBASTIAN FL 32958 Legal COLLIER CREEK ESTATES PHASE FIVE - BLK F LOT 5 PBI 17-28 Site Address 745 HOLDEN AV Revision Date : 3/8/2019 Parcel # 31391800009000600006.0 Assessment= $5,940.80 Owner RHEIN, JEFFREY M and SUSAN L Secondary Owner #1 Secondary Owner #2 _ Mailing Address 743 HOLDEN AVE SEBASTIAN FL 32958 Legal COLLIER CREEK ESTATES PHASE FIVE - BLK F LOT 6 PBI 17-28 Site Address 743 HOLDEN AV Revision Date : 3/8/201.9 Parcel # 31391800009000600007.0 Assessment= $5,940.80 Owner DEDRICK, ERIK & DEANA _ Secondary Owner #1 Secondary Owner #2 Mailing Address 741 HOLDEN AVE SEBASTIAN FL 32958 Legal COLLIER CREEK ESTATES PHASE FIVE - BLK F LOT 7 PBI 17-28 Site Address 741 HOLDEN AV Revision Date : 3/S/2019 365 Pain 39of47 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY — DEPARTMENT OF UTILITY SERVICES COLLIER CREEK — PHASE 1, 1A & 1B WATER ASSESSMENT PROJECT FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL— RESOLUTION 4 \4t,'"4:%1•:" Parcel # 313918000090006000. 08.0 Assessment= $S,940.80_ Owner BLECKER, EDGAR and ELVA Secondary Owner #1 Secondary Owner #2 Mailing Address 739 HOLDEN AVE SEBASTIAN FL 32958 Legal COLLIER CREEK ESTATES PHASE FIVE - BLK F LOT 8 PBI 17-28 Site Address 739 HOLDEN AV Rev6ion Date : 3/8/2019 Parcel # 31391800009000600009.0 Assessment= $5,940.80 Owner JOHNSTON, GARY WAYNE E and SALLY ANITA Secondary Owner #1 Secondary Owner #2 _ Mailing Address - ---- ---- 738 HOLDEN AVE SEBASTIAN FL 32958 Legal COLLIER CREEK ESTATES PHASE FIVE - BLK F LOT 9 PBI 17-28 Site Address 738 HOLDEN AV Revision Data : 3/8/2019 Parcel # 31391800009000600010.0 Assessment= $5,940.80 Owner HEISS, JOHN M JR•& Secondary Owner #1 HOLSTEIN, DEBRA L — Secondary Owner #2 Mailing Address 740 HOLDEN AVE SEBASTIAN FL 32958 Legal COLLIER CREEK ESTATES PHASE FIVE - BLK F LOT 10 PBI 17-28 Site Address 740 HOLDEN AV Revision Date : 3/8/201.9 366 Pane40of47 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY — DEPARTMENT OF UTILITY SERVICES . COLLIER CREEK — PHASE 1, 1A & 1B WATER ASSESSMENT PROJECT FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL — RESOLUTION 4 Parcel # 31391800009000600011.0 Assessment= $5,940.80__ Owner MANZI, AL and PHYLLIS Secondary Owner #1 - Secondary Owner #2 Mailing Address 742 HOLDEN AVE - --- ----- - ---- SEBASTIAN FL 32958 Legal COLLIER CREEK ESTATES PHASE FIVE - BLK F LOT 11 PBI 17-28 Site Address 742 HOLDEN AV Revision Date 3/8/2019 Parcel # 31391800009000600012.0 Assessment= $5,940.80 Owner MARTIN, ROBERT E (LE) & KEMBERLYA (LE) Secondary Owner #1 MARTIN, KEMBERLY A (TRS) Secondary Owner #2 MARTIN, ROBERT E (TRS) Mailing Address 744 HOLDEN AVE SEBASTIAN FL 32958 Legal COLLIER CREEK ESTATES PHASE FIVE - BLK F LOTS 12 & 13 PBI 17- 28 Site Address 744 HOLDEN AV Revision Date : 3/8/2019 Parcel # 31391800009000600014.0 Assessment= $5,940.80 Owner NIELSEN-CITO, DIANE R & Secondary Owner#1 CITO, GARY Secondary Owner #2 Mailing Address 748 HOLDEN AV SEBASTIAN FL 32958 Legal COLLIER CREEK ESTATES PHASE FIVE - BLK F LOT 14 PBI 17-28 Site Address 748 HOLDEN AV Revision Date 3/8/2019 367 Paee 41 of 47 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY — DEPARTMENT OF UTILITY SERVICES COLLIER CREEK — PHASE 1, 1A & 16 WATER ASSESSMENT PROJECT FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL— RESOLUTION 4 Parcel # 31391800009000600015.0 Assessment= $5,940.80 Owner KINKAID, ROGER ALAN Secondary Owner #1 Secondary Owner #2 Mailing Address 2751 AINA LANI DR PAKALNI HI 96768 Legal COLLIER CREEK ESTATES PHASE FIVE - BLK F LOT 15 PBI 17-28 Site Address 750 HOLDEN AV Revision Date : 3/8/2019 Parcel # 31391800009000600016.0 Assessment= $5,940.8.0_ Owner ZORICK, JOHN M &'KAREN L Secondary Owner #1 Secondary Owner #2 Mailing Address 752 HOLDEN AVE SEBASTIAN FL 32958-5047 Legal COLLIER CREEK ESTATES PHASE FIVE - BLK F LOT 16'PBI 17-28 Site Address 752 HOLDEN AV Revisions Date : 3/8/2019 Parcel # 31391800009000700006.0 Assessment= 55,940.80 Owner MYERS, RICHARD L& Secondary Owner #1 CATON, JENNIFER A Secondary Owner #2 Mailing Address 109 BECKER AVE SEBASTIAN FL 32958 Legal COLLIER CREEK ESTATES PHASE FIVE - BLK G LOT 6 PBI 17-28 Site Address 109 BECKER AV Revision Date : 3/8/201) 368 Paee 42 -of 47 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY — DEPARTMENT OF UTILITY SERVICES COLLIER CREEK — PHASE 1, 1A & 1B WATER ASSESSMENT PROJECT FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL— RESOLUTION 4 Parcel # 31391800009000700007.0 Assessment= $5,940.80 Owner LEIPERT, GABRIELE A Secondary Owner #1 Secondary Owner #2 Mailing Address 107 BECKER AVE _ SEBASTIAN FL 32958 • Legal COLLIER CREEK ESTATES PHASE FIVE - BLK G LOT 7 PBI 17-28 Site Address 107 BECKER AV Revision Data : 3/8/2019 Parcel # 31391800009000700008.0 Assessment= $5,940.80_ Owner PERANI, ROBERT&JEAN Secondary Owner #1 Secondary Owner #2 Mailing Address 105 BECKER AVE SEBASTIAN FL 32958 Legal COLLIER CREEK ESTATES PHASE FIVE - UK G LOT 8 P81 17-28 Site Address 105 BECKER AV Revision Date : 318/2019 Parcel # 31391800009000700009.0 Assessment= $5,940.80 Owner PARKER, GREGORY (TRS)(TOK) & ERLINDA (TRS)(TOK) Secondary Owner #1 Secondary Owner #2 - Mailing Address 103 BECKER AVE SEBASTIAN FL 32958 Legal COLLIER CREEK ESTATES PHASE FIVE - BLK G LOT 9 PBI 17-28 Site Address 103 BECKER AV Revision Date : 3/8/2019. 369 Page 43 of 47, INDIAN RIVER COUNTY — DEPARTMENT OF UTILITY SERVICES COLLIER CREEK — PHASE 1, & 1B WATER ASSESSMENT PROJECT FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL — RESOLUTION 4 Parcel # 31391800009000700010.0 Assessment= $5,940.80 Owner KEEPING, KAREN 1 Secondary Owner #1 Secondary Owner #2 Mailing Address 101 BECKER AVE SEBASTIAN FL 32958 Legal COLLIER CREEK ESTATES PHASE FIVE - BLK G LOT 10 PBI 17-28 Site Address 101 BECKER AV Rnvision pate : 3/8/2019 Parcel # 31391800009000900006.0 - Assessment= $5,940.80 Owner BARONE, LOUIS & KAREN Secondary Owner #1 Secondary Owner #2 Mailing Address 739 S EASY ST • SEBASTIAN FL 32958 Legal COLLIER CREEK ESTATES PHASE FIVE - BLK I LOT 6 PBI 17-28 Site Address 739 S EASY ST Revision Date : 3/8/2019 Parcel # 31391800009000900007.0 Assessment= $5,940.80 Owner JOHNSON, ROBERT F and LYNN DAVIS _ Secondary Owner #1 Secondary Owner #2 Mailing Address 7415 EASY ST SEBASTIAN FL 32958 Legal COLLIER CREEK ESTATES PHASE FIVE - BLK I LOT 7 PBI 17-28 • Site Address 741 S EASY ST Revision Date : 3/8/2019 370 Page 44 of 47 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY — DEPARTMENT OF UTILITY SERVICES COLLIER CREEK —PHASE 1, 1A & 1B WATER ASSESSMENT PROJECT FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL — RESOLUTION 4 Parcel # 31391800009000900008.0 Assessment= $5,940.80 Owner GURECK1, JOHNS & KATHARINE Secondary Owner #1 Secondary Owner 12 Mailing Address 743 5 EASY ST SEBASTIAN FL 32958 Legal COWER CREEK ESTATES PHASE FIVE - BLK I LOT 8 PBI 17-28 Site Address 743 S EASY ST Revision Date : 3/8/2019 Parcel # 31391800009000900009.0 Assessment= $5,940.80 Owner FOLLEY, CHRISTOPHER T & JOANNE A Secondary Owner #1 DRINKWATER, JOANNE A Secondary Owner #2 Mailing Address 745 S EASY ST SEBASTIAN FL 32958 Legal COLLIER CREEK ESTATES PHASE FIVE - BLK I LOT 9 PBI 17-28 Site Address 745 S EASY ST Revision Date : 3/8/2019 Parcel it 31391800009000900010.0 Assessment= _ $5,940.80 Owner JOHNSTON, JOHNT (TR) & MARCIA L (TR) Secondary Owner #1 Secondary Owner #2 Mailing Address 747 S EASY ST SEBASTIAN FL 32958 Legal COLLIER CREEK ESTATES PHASE FIVE - BLK I LOT 10 PBI 17-28 V Site Address 747 S EASY ST Revision Date : 3/S/201.9 371 Pape 45 OF 47 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY — DEPARTMENT OF UTILITY SERVICES COLLIER CREEK— PHASE 1, lA & 1B WATER ASSESSMENT PROJECT FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL— RESOLUTION 4 Parcel # 31391800009000900011.0 Assessment= $5,940.80 Owner WOJCIKIEWICZ, TOMASZ and BARBARA Secondary Owner #1 Secondary Owner #2 Mailing Address 749 S EASY ST SEBASTIAN FL 32958 Legal COLLIER CREEK ESTATES PHASE FIVE -BLK I LOT 11 PBI 17-28 Site Address 749 S EASY ST Revision Date : 3/8/2019 Parcel # 31391800009000900012.0 Assessment= $5,940.80 Owner GURECKI, JOHN S & KATHARINE H Secondary Owner #1 Secondary Owner #2 Mailing Address 7515 EASY ST SEBASTIAN FL 32958 Legal COLLIER CREEK ESTATES PHASE FIVE - BLK I LOT 12 PBI 17-28 Site Address 751 S EASY ST Revision Date : 3/8/201D Parcel # 3139180001100090000.2.0 Assessment= $5,940.80 Owner REINH A RT, KIM (TR) Secondary Owner #1 _ Secondary Owner #2 Mailing Address 5080 HARMONY CIRCLE #103 VERO BEACH FL 32967 Legal COLLIER CREEK ESTATES PHASE SIX - BLK I LOT 2 P81 17-76 Site Address 729 S EASY ST Revision Date : 3/8/2019 372 PaRe 46of-47, • INDIAN RIVER COUNTY — DEPARTMENT OF UTILITY SERVICES COLLIER CREEK — PHASE 1, 1A & 1B WATER ASSESSMENT PROJECT FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL — RESOLUTION 4 Parcel # 31391800011000900003.0 Assessment= .$5,940.80 Owner SPILLIS, LAURA ANN Secondary Owner #1 SPILL'S, ABIGAIL BALDWIN Secondary Owner #2 Mailing Address 733 S EASY ST -- ------ - - - - SEBASTIAN FL 32958 Legal COLLIER CREEK ESTATES PHASE SIX - BLK I LOT 3 P8I 17-76 Site Address 733 S EASY ST Revision Date : 3/8/2019 Parcel 0 31391800011000900004.0 Assessment= $5,940.80 Owner DISCENZA, TRAVIS E & SUSAN K Secondary Owner 01 Secondary Owner 02 Mailing Address 735 S EASY ST SEBASTIAN FL 32958 Legal COLLIER CREEK ESTATES PHASE SIX - BLK I LOT 4 PBI 17-76 Site Address 735 S EASY ST Revision Date : 3/8/2019 Parcel # 31391800011000900005.0 Assessment= $5,940.80 Owner SIWICKI, DAVID.) and SANDRA L Secondary Owner #1 Secondary Owner #2 Mailing Address 737 S EASY ST SEBASTIAN FL 32958 Legal COLLIER CREEK ESTATES PHASE SIX - BLK I LOT 5 PBI 17-76 Site Address 737 S EASY ST Revision Date : 3/8/2019 373 Pane 47.of97 As Built (Final Reso.) Collier Creek Phase 2 & Phase 3 Harbor Point RESOLUTION NO. 2019- A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, CERTIFYING "AS -BUILT" COSTS IN CONNECTION WITH A WATER MAIN EXTENSION FROM 101 BARBARA COURT TO AND INCLUDING 108 BARBARA COURT; 101 AREGA STREET TO AND INCLUDING 110 AREGA STREET; 201 AREGA STREET TO AND INCLUDING 213 AREGA STREET; 200 HUNT COURT TO AND INCLUDING 204 HUNT COURT; AND 201 BANKS COURT TO AND INCLUDING 203 BANKS COURT, WITHIN PORTIONS OF PHASES TWO AND SIX OF THE SUBDIVISION OF COLLIER CREEK ESTATES (UTILITY PHASE 2); AND PROVIDING FOR A WATER MAIN EXTENSION FROM 100 HARBOR POINT DRIVE TO AND INCLUDING 117 HARBOR POINT DRIVE; AND 900 S. FLEMING STREET TO AND INCLUDING 907 S. FLEMING STREET WITHIN HARBOR POINT SUBDIVISION (UTILITY PHASE 3), LOCATED WITHIN THE CITY OF SEBASTIAN, IN INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA; AND SUCH OTHER CONSTRUCTION NECESSITATED BY SUCH PROJECT; PROVIDING FOR FORMAL COMPLETION DATE, AND DATE FOR PAYMENT WITHOUT PENALTY AND INTEREST. WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County (`Board") determined that a water main extension from 101 Barbara Court to and including 108 Barbara Court; 101 Arega Street to and including 110 Arega Street; 201 Arega Street to and including 213 Arega Street; 200 Hunt Court to and including 204 Hunt Court; and 201 Banks Court to and including 203 Banks Court, within portions of Phases Two and Six of the subdivision of Collier Creek Estates (Utility Phase 2); and a water main extension from 100 Harbor Point Drive to and including 117 Harbor Point Drive; and 900 S. Flemming Street to and including 907 S. Fleming Street within Harbor Point Subdivision (Utility Phase 3), located within the City of Sebastian, in Indian River County, Florida are necessary to promote the public welfare of the county; and WHEREAS, on Tuesday, June 13, 2017, the Board held a public hearing at which time and place the owners of property to be assessed appeared before the Board to be heard as to the propriety and advisability of making such improvements; and WHEREAS, after such public hearing was held the Board adopted Resolution No. 2017- 055, which confirmed the special assessment cost of the project to the property specially benefited by the project in the amounts listed in the attachment to that resolution; and WHEREAS, now that the project has been completed, the Director of Utility Services has certified the actual "as -built" cost to be less than the cost in confirming Resolution No. 2017-055, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, as follows: P:Wtturney\N ncy\COCSW rfl. PROJT CTS\Callier Creek PlIA5C 2 and Phare 3 Harbor point . resolution 4 assessment project docx 374 RESOLUTION NO. 2019- 1. To avoid interest and penalty charges, payment may be made within ninety days after passage of this resolution (Resolution No. 2019- ). 2. Payments bearing interest at the rate of 5.00% per annum may be made in ten annual installments, the first to be made twelve months from the due date. The due date is the date of passage of this. resolution. 3. The final assessment roll for the project listed in Resolution No. 2017-055 shall be as shown on the attached Exhibit "A." 4, The assessments, as shown on the attached Exhibit "A," shall stand confirmed, and will remain legal, valid, and binding first liens against the property against which such assessments are made until paid. 5. The assessments shown on Exhibit "A," attached to Resolution No. 2017-055, were recorded by the. County on the public records of Indian River County, and the lien shall remain prima facie evidence of its validity. The resolution was moved for adoption by Commissioner , and the motion was seconded by Commissioner , and, upon being put to a vote, the vote was as follows: Chairman Bob Solari Vice Chairman Susan Adams Commissioner Joseph E. Flescher Commissioner Tim Zorc Commissioner Peter D. O'Bryan The Chairman thereupon declared the resolution duly passed and adopted this day of , 2019. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA Attest: Jeffrey R. Smith, Clerk of the Circuit Court and Comptroller By By Bob Solari, Chairman Deputy Clerk Approved for fo . nd legal - ciency: 2 375 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY — DEPARTMENT OF UTILITY SERVICES PORTION OF COLLIER CREEK AND HARBOR POINT — PHASE 2 & 3 WATER ASSESSMENT PROJECT FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL— RESOLUTION 4 Parcel # 3138130000.70.00000001.0 Assessment= $5,9.40.80 Owner KING, JOHN A (TR)(TOK) Secondary Owner #1 Secondary Owner #2 Mailing Address 901.5 FLEMING ST SEBASTIAN FL 32958 Legal HARBOR POINT SUB - LOT 1 PBI 14-77 Site Address 901 S FLEMING ST Revision Date : 3/12/2019 Parcel # 31381300007000000002.0 Assessment= $5,940.80 Owner CURTIS, WILLIAM R & DAWN E Secondary Owner #1 Secondary Owner #2 Mailing Address 101 HARBOR POINT DR SEBASTIAN FL 32958 Legal HARBOR POINT SUB - LOT 2 PBI 14-77 Site Address 101 HARBOR POINT DR Revision Date : 3/12/2019 Parcel # 31381300007000000003.0 Assessment= $5,940.80 Owner BETANCOURT, STEVEN & THERESA ANN Secondary Owner #1 Secondary Owner #2 Mailing Address 103 HARBOR POINT DR SEBASTIAN FL 32958 Legal HARBOR POINT SUB - LOT 3 FBI 14-77 Site Address 103 HARBOR POINT DR Revision Date : 3/12/2019 EXHIBIT "A" 376 Paee 1 of 20 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY — DEPARTMENT OF UTILITY SERVICES PORTION OF COLLIER CREEK AND HARBOR POINT -- PHASE 2 & 3 WATER ASSESSMENT PROJECT FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL — RESOLUTION 4 Parcel # 31381300007000000004.0 Assessment= $5,940.80 Owner BUSH, LISA Secondary Owner #1 Secondary Owner, #2 Mailing Address 105 HARBOR POINT DR SEBASTIAN FL 32958 Legal HARBOR POINT SUB - LOT 4 PBI 14-77 Site Address 105 HARBOR POINT DR Revision Date : 3/12/2019 Parcel # 31381300007000000005.0 Assessment= $5,940.80 Owner RANDOLPH, JAMES A (LE) & BARBARA M (LE) Secondary Owner #1 RANDOLPH, BARBARA K (COTRS) Secondary Owner #2 RANDOLPH, JAMES A (COTRS) Mailing Address 107 HARBOR POINT DR SEBASTIAN FL 32958 Legal HARBOR POINT SUB - LOT 5 P81 14-77 Site Address 107 HARBOR POINT DR ReAs(on Date ; 3/12/2019 Parcel # 31381300007000000006.0 _ Assessment= $5,940.80 Owner MIHELICH, JOSEPH M and KAREN A Secondary Owner #1 Secondary Owner #2 Mailing Address 109 HARBOR POINT DR SEBASTIAN FL 32958 Legal HARBOR POINT SUB - LOT 6 PBI 14-77 Site Address 109 HARBOR POINT DR Revision Date : 3/12/2019 377 Paee2of20 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY — DEPARTMENT OF UTILITY SERVICES PORTION OF COLLIER CREEK AND HARBOR POINT --- PHASE 2 & 3 WATER ASSESSMENT PROJECT FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL— RESOLUTION 4 Parcel # 31381300007000000007.0 Assessment= $5,940.80 Owner ARLOTTA, MICHAEL and TRACY Secondary Owner #1 Secondary Owner #2 Mailing Address_ 111 HARBOR POINT DR_ SEBASTIAN FL 32958 Legal HARBOR POINT SUB - LOT 7 PBI 14-77 Site Address 111 HARBOR POINT DR Revision Date : 3/12/2019 Parcel # 31381300007000000008.0 Assessment= $5,940.80 Owner CHERRY, LAWRENCE J & JILL M Secondary Owner #1 _ Secondary Owner #2 Mailing Address _ 113 HARBOR POINT DR SEBASTIAN FL 32958 Legal HARBOR POINT SUB - LOT 8 PBI 14-77 Site Address 113 HARBOR POINT DR Revi,ion Date: 3/12/2019 Parcel # 31381300007000000009.0 Assessment= $5,940.80 Owner PASCHALL, GREGORY S and REBECCA A Secondary Owner #1 Secondary Owner #2 Mailing Address 115 HARBOR POINT DR SEBASTIAN FL 32958 Legal HARBOR POINT SUB - LOT 9 PBI 14-77 Site Address 115 HARBOR POINT DR Revision Date : 3/12/2019 378 Pane-3—of 2d INDIAN RIVER COUNTY -- DEPARTMENT OF UTILITY SERVICES PORTION OF COLLIER CREEK AND HARBOR POINT PHASE 2 & 3 WATER ASSESSMENT PROJECT FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL— RESOLUTION 4 Parcel # 31381300007000000010.0 Assessment= $5,94.0.80 Owner TAllIA, NORMA P (TR)(TOK) Secondary Owner #1 Secondary Owner #2 Mailing Address 117 HARBOR POINT DR SEBASTIAN FL 32958 Legal HARBOR POINT SUB - LOT 10 PBI 14-77 Site Address 117 HARBOR POINT DR Revision Date : 3/12/2019 Parcel # 31381300007000000011.0 Assessment= $5,940.80 Owner GAMBRELL, LESLIE C and DEBRA A Secondary Owner #1 Secondary Owner #2 _ Mailing Address 116 HARBOR POINT DR SEBASTIAN FL 32958 Legal HARBOR POINT SUB - LOT 11 PBI 14-77 Site Address 116 HARBOR POINT DR Revision Date : 3/12/2019 Parcel # 31381300007000000012.0 Assessment= $5,940.80 Owner GRIMALDI, RAYMOND V (TR)(TOK and MARCIA! (TR)(TOK) Secondary Owner #1 Secondary Owner #2 Mailing Address 114 HARBOR POINT DR SEBASTIAN FL 32958 Legal HARBOR POINT SUB - LOT 12 PBI 14-77 Site Address 114 HARBOR POINT DR Revision Dale : 3/12/2019 379 Paae 4 of -0 INDIAN RIVER' COUNTY — DEPARTMENT OF UTILITY SERVICES PORTION OF COLLIER CREEK AND HARBOR POINT — PHASE 2 & 3 WATER ASSESSMENT PROJECT FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL RESOLUTION 4 Parcel # 31381300007000000013.0 Assessment= $5,940.80 Owner CLARK, ROBERT S and DOROTHY C Secondary Owner #1 Secondary Owner #2 Mailing Address 112 HARBOR POINT DR SEBASTIAN FL 32958 Legal HARBOR POINT SUB - LOT 13 PBI 14-77 Site Address 112 HARBOR POINT DR Revision Date : 3/12/2019 Parcel # 31381300007000000014.0 Assessment= $5,940.80 Owner RAMSAY, MARIE (TR) Secondary Owner #1 Secondary Owner #2 Mailing Address 709 NE 18TH AVE FORT LAUDERDALE FL 33304 Legal HARBOR POINT SUB - LOT 14 PBI 14-77 Site Address 110 HARBOR POINT DR Revision Date 3/12/2019 Parcel # 31381300007000000015.0 Assessment= $5,940.80 Owner NEWMAN, MARK L& KAREN L Secondary Owner #1 Secondary Owner #2 Mailing Address 7 TEE LANE PORT JEFFERSON STATION NY 11776 Legal HARBOR POINT SUB - LOT 15 PBI 14-77 Site Address 108 HARBOR POINT DR Revision Date • 3/12/2019 380 Paee 5 of 20 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY — DEPARTMENT OF UTILITY SERVICES PORTION OF COLLIER CREEK AND HARBOR POINT — PHASE 2 & 3 WATER ASSESSMENT PROJECT FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL— RESOLUTION 4 Parcel # 31381300007000000016.0 Assessment= $__5,940.80 Owner GROCHOWSK$, ALAN E & LYNN Secondary Owner #1 SWEENEY-CSIKORTOS, LYNN Secondary Owner 02 Mailing Address 106 HARBOR POINT DR SEBASTIAN FL 32958 Legal HARBOR POINT SUB - LOT 16 PBI 14=77 Site Address 106 HARBOR POINT DR Revision Date : 3/12/2019 Parcel # 31381300007000.000017.0 Assessment= $5,940.80 Owner LAVISKA, JOHN R JR & NANCY A _ Secondary Owner #1 Secondary Owner #2 Mailing Address 104 HARBOR POINT DR SEBASTIAN FL 32958 Legal HARBOR POINT SUB - LOT 17 PBI 14-77 Site Address 104. HARBOR POINT DR Revision Date : 3/12/2019 Parcel # 31381300007000000018.0 Assessment= $5,9.40.80 Owner MATTUCCI, ROBERTJ and BARBARAJ Secondary Owner #1 Secondary Owner #2 _ Mailing Address 5361 N MESA DR CASTLE ROCK CO 80108 Legal HARBOR POINT SUB - LOT 18 PBI 14-77 Site Address 102 HARBOR POINT DR Revision Date : 3/12/2019 381 Paae6oi20 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY — DEPARTMENT OF UTILITY SERVICES PORTION OF COLLIER CREEK AND HARBOR POINT — PHASE 2 & 3 WATER ASSESSMENT PROJECT FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL— RESOLUTION 4 vf',"" Parcel # 31381300007000000019.0 Assessment= $5,940.80 Owner SAMUELSON, DAVID A and SHERRYA Secondary Owner #1 Secondary Owner #2 Mailing Address 100 HARBOR POINT DR SEBASTIAN FL 32958 Legal HARBOR POINT SUB - LOT 19 PBI 14-77 Site Address 100 HARBOR POINT DR Revision Date 3/12/2019 Parcel # 31381300007000000020.0 Assessment= $5,940.80. Owner MCELWAIN, BLANE & NANCY Secondary Owner #1 Secondary Owner 112 Mailing Address 907 S FLEMING ST SEBASTIAN FL 32958 Legal HARBOR POINT SUB - LOT 20 PBI 14-77 Site Address 907 S FLEMING ST Revision Date 3/12/2019 Parcel # 31381300007000000021.0 Assessment= $5,940.80 Owner DODD, CHARLES E and DENISE S Secondary Owner #1 _ Secondary Owner #2 Mailing Address 906 FLEMING ST SEBASTIAN FL 32958 Legal HARBOR POINT SUB - LOT 21 PBI 14-77 Site Address 906 S FLEMING ST Revision Date : 3/12/2019 382 Paae 7,of 20 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY — DEPARTMENT OF UTILITY. SERVICES PORTION OF COLLIER CREEK AND HARBOR POINT — PHASE 2 & 3 WATER ASSESSMENT PROJECT FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL— RESOLUTION 4 Parcel # 31381300007000000022.0 Assessment= 55,940.80 Owner GRAHAM, ROBERT & VICKI Secondary Owner #1 Secondary Owner #2 Mailing Address 904 S FLEMING ST SEBASTIAN FL 32958 Legal HARBOR POINT SUB - LOT 22 PBI 14-77 Site Address 904 S FLEMING ST Revision Date : 3/12/2019 Parcel # 31381300007000000023.0 Assessment= $5,940.80 Owner KNOTTS, DAVID 0 and d DIANE M Secondary Owner #1 Secondary Owner #2 Mailing Address 902 S FLEMING ST SEBASTIAN FL32958 Legal HARBOR POINT SUB - LOT 23 PBI 14-77 Site Address 902 S FLEMING ST Revision Date : 3/12/2019 Parcel # 31381300007000000024.0 Assessment= $5,940.80 Owner BRINK, THOMAS A & NANCY J Secondary Owner #1 Secondary Owner #2 Mailing Address 900 FLEMING ST SEBASTIAN FL 32958 Legal HARBOR POINT SUB - LOT 24 PBI 14-77 Site Address 900 S FLEMING ST Revision Date : 3/12/2019 383 Paec 8 of 20 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY — DEPARTMENT OF UTILITY SERVICES PORTION OF COLLIER CREEK AND HARBOR POINT — PHASE 2 & 3 WATER ASSESSMENT PROJECT FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL— RESOLUTION 4 Parcel # _ 31391800006000300001.0 Assessment= $5,940.80 Owner GLEASON, SHELDON I. & Secondary Owner #1 GLEASON, JAMES E Secondary Owner #2 Mailing Address 101 BARBARA CT SEBASTIAN FL 32958 Legal COLLIER CREEK ESTATES PHASE TWO - BLK CLOT 1 PBI 15-39 Site Address 101 BARBARA CT Revision Date : 3/12/2019 Parcel # 31391800006000300002.0 Assessment= $5,940.80 Owner AGHA, TAHIR H QIZILBASH & _ Secondary Owner #1 QIZTLBASH, ZAKIA B Secondary Owner #2 Mailing Address 103 BARBARA CT SEBASTIAN FL32958 Legal COLLIER CREEK ESTATES PHASE TWO - BLK C LOT 2 PBI 15 -39 -------------- Site Address 103 BARBARA Cr Revision Date : 3/12/2019 Parcel # 31391800006000300003.0 Assessment= $5,940.8.0_ Owner HULL, RICHARD G and MUNICENT E Secondary Owner #1 Secondary Owner #2 Mailing Address 105 BARBARA CT SEBASTIAN FL 32958 Legal COLLIER CREEK ESTATES PHASE TWO - BLK C LOT 3 PBI 15-39 Site Address 105 BARBARA CT Revision Date : 3/1212019 384 Paee.9 of.20 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY — DEPARTMENT OF UTILITY SERVICES PORTION OF COLLIER CREEK AND HARBOR POINT— PHASE 2 & 3 WATER ASSESSMENT PROJECT FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL — RESOLUTION 4 Parcel # 31391800006000300004.0 Assessment= $5,940.80 Owner SMITH, MICHAEL J JR and ANGELA MARIE Secondary Owner #1 Secondary Owner #2 Mailing Address 107 BARBARA CT SEBASTIAN FL 32958 Legal COLLIER CREEK ESTATES PHASE TWO - BLK C LOT 4 PBI 15-39 Site Address 107 BARBARA CT Ri.vision Date 3/12/2019 Parcel # 31391800006000300005.0 Assessment= 55,940.80 Owner MCCARDELL, JAMES R & Secondary Owner #1 WOOD, PAMELA H Secondary Owner #2 Mailing Address 108 BARBARA CT SEBASTIAN FL 32958 Legal COLLIER CREEK ESTATES PHASE TWO - BLK C LOT 5 PBI 15-39 Site Address 108 BARBARA CT Revision Date ; 3/12/2019 Parcel # 31391800006000300006.0 Assessment= $5,940.80 Owner PRUDENT', ANTHONY & ELIZABETH Secondary Owner #1 Secondary Owner #2 Mailing Address 106 BARBARA CT SEBASTIAN FL 32958 Legal COLLIER CREEK ESTATES PHASE TWO - BLK C LOT 6 PBI 15-39 Site Address 106 BARBARA CT Revision Date : 3/12/2019 385 Paee 10 of 20 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY — DEPARTMENT OF UTILITY SERVICES PORTION OF COLLIER CREEK AND HARBOR POINT— PHASE 2 & 3 WATER ASSESSMENT PROJECT FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL — RESOLUTION 4 Parcel # 31391800006000300007.0 Assessment= $S,940.80 Owner Confidential _ Secondary Owner #1 Secondary Owner #2 Mailing Address Legal COLLIER CREEK ESTATES PHASE TWO - BLK C LOT 7 PBI 15-39 Site Address Revision Date : 3/12/2019 Parcel # 31391800006000300008.0 Assessment= $5,940.80 Owner t KELLY, JAMES J & JOANNE Secondary Owner #1 Secondary Owner #2 Mailing Address PO BOX 1386 SAGHARBOR NY 11963 Legal COLLIER CREEK ESTATES PHASE TWO -131.1( C LOT 8 P81 15-39 Site Address 102 BARBARA CT Revision Date : 3/12/2019 Parcel # 31391800006000400001.0 Assessment= $5,940.80 Owner HENDERSON, BETH H Secondary Owner #1 Secondary Owner #2 Mailing Address 101 AREGA ST SEBASTIAN FL 32958 Legal COWER CREEK ESTATES PHASE TWO - BLK D LOT 1 P81 15-39 • Site Address 101 AREGA ST Revision Date : 3/12/2019 386 Page 11 -of 20 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY —.DEPARTMENT OF UTILITY SERVICES PORTION OF COLLIER CREEK AND HARBOR POINT— PHASE 2 & 3 WATER ASSESSMENT PROJECT FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL-- RESOLUTION 4 Parcel # 31391800006000400002.0 Assessment= $5,940.80 Owner PURAKOVICS, JOHN and LINDSAY Secondary Owner #1 _ Secondary Owner #2 Mailing Address 103 AREGA ST SEBASTIAN FL 32958 Legal COLLIER CREEK ESTATES PHASE TWO - BLK 0 LOT 2 PBI 15-39 Site Address 103 AREGA ST Revision Date : 3/12/2019 Parcel # 31391800006000400003.0 Assessment= _ $5,940.80 Owner DEMPSEY, DOROTHY M and MARK E Secondary Owner #1 _ Secondary Owner #2 Mailing Address 105 AREGA ST SEBASTIAN FL 32958 Legal COLLIER CREEK ESTATES PHASE TWO - BLK 0 LOT 3 PBI 15-39 Site Address 105 AREGA ST Revision Date : 3/12/2019 Parcel # 31391800006000400004.0 Assessment= $5,940.80 Owner ALTVATER, HENRY L and EDITH E Secondary Owner#1 Secondary Owner #2 Mailing Address 472 FLEMING ST SEBASTIAN FL 32958 Legal COLLIER CREEK ESTATES PHASE TWO - BLK D LOT 4 PBI 15-39 Site Address 107 AREGA ST Revision Date : 3/12/2019 387 Paee12 of 20 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY - DEPARTMENT OF UTILITY SERVICES PORTION OF COLLIER CREEK AND HARBOR POINT- PHASE 2 & 3 WATER ASSESSMENT PROJECT FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL- RESOLUTION 4 Parcel # 31391800006000400005.0 Assessment= .$5,940.80 Owner PAUL, ANDREW (LE) & BARBARA (LE & NEIL R II Secondary Owner #1 PAUL, ANDREW H III _ Secondary Owner 02 PAUL, NEIL R II Mailing Address 109 AREGA ST SEBASTIAN FL 32958 _ Legal COLLIER CREEK ESTATES PHASE TWO - BLK D LOT 5 P81 15-39 Site Address 109 AREGA ST Revision Date : 3/12/2019 Parcel # 31391800006000400006.0 Assessment= $5,940.80 Owner DUNN, DEAN L & LAURA Secondary Owner #1 Secondary Owner #2 • Mailing Address 110 AREGA ST SEBASTIAN FL 32958 Legal COLLIER CREEK ESTATES PHASE TWO - BLK D LOT 6 PBI 15-39 Site Address 110 AREGA ST Revision Delta : 3/12/2019 Parcel # 31391800006000400007.0 Assessment= $5,940.8. 0 Owner WALKER, JOHN J JR Secondary Owner #1 ANDERSON, REBECCA R Secondary Owner 02 Mailing Address 114 SALAZAR LN SEBASTIAN FL 32958 Legal COLLIER CREEK ESTATES PHASE TWO - BLK D LOT 7 PBI 15-39 Site Address 108 AREGA ST Revision Date : 3/12/2019 388 Page 13 of 20 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY — DEPARTMENT OF UTILITY SERVICES PORTION OF COLLIER CREEK AND HARBOR POINT — PHASE 2 & 3 WATER ASSESSMENT PROJECT FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL RESOLUTION 4 Parcel # 31391800006000400008.0 Assessment= $5,940.80 Owner PALLON, ANTHONY CJR and KAREN T Secondary Owner #i Secondary Owner #2 Mailing Address 106 AREGA ST SEBASTIAN FL 32958 Legal COLLIER CREEK ESTATES PHASE TWO - BLK D LOT 8 PBI 15-39 Site Address 106 AREGA ST Revision Date : 3/12/2019 Parcel # 31391800006000400009.0 Assessment= 55,940.80 Owner KAPALKA,'THADDE_ USJ _ Secondary Owner #1 Secondary Owner #2 Mailing Address 104 AREGA ST SEBASTIAN FL 32958 Legal COLLIER CREEK ESTATES PHASE TWO - BLK D LOT 9 PBI 15-39 Site Address 104 AREGA ST Revision Date : 3/12/2019 Parcel # 31391800006000400010.0 Assessment= $5,940.80 Owner BENNETT-CROSDALE, DIANA (TRS) Secondary Owner #1 Secondary Owner #2 Mailing Address PO BOX 880642 PORT ST LUCIE FL 34988-0642 Legal COLLIER CREEK ESTATES PHASE TWO - BLK D LOT 10 PBI 15-39 Site Address 102 AREGA ST - -- Revision Date : 3/12/2019 389 Page 14 of 20 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY — DEPARTMENT OF UTILITY SERVICES PORTION OF COLLIER CREEK AND HARBOR POINT -- PHASE 2 & 3 WATER ASSESSMENT PROJECT FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL — RESOLUTION 4 Parcel # 31391800011000S00001.0 Assessment= $5,940.80 Owner HORNE, MAURINE & BARRY _ Secondary Owner #1 Secondary 'Owner #2 Mailing Address 110 SALAZAR LN SEBASTIAN FL 32958 Legal COLLIER CREEK ESTATES PHASE SIX - BLK E LOT 1 PBI 17-76 Site Address 200 HUNT CT Revision Date : 3/12/2019 Parcel # 31391800011000500002M Assessment= $5,940.80 Owner SAVAGE, JAMES A (TR) & GRACE A (TR) Secondary Owner #1 Secondary Owner #2 , Mailing Address 204 HUNT CT SEBASTIAN FL 32958 Legal COLLIER CREEK ESTATES PHASE SIX - BLK E LOT 2 PBI 17-76 Site Address 202 HUNT CT Revision Date : 3/12/2019 Parcel # 31391800011000500003.0 Assessment= $5,940.80 Owner SAVAGE, JAMES A (LE) & GRACE A (LE) Secondary Owner #1 SAVAGE, ERIC J Secondary Owner #2 Mailing Address 204 HUNT CT SEBASTIAN FL 32958 Legal COLLIER CREEK ESTATES PHASE SIX - MX E LOT 3 PBI 17-76 Site Address 204 HUNT CT Revision Date : 3/12/2019 390 Paee15of20 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY — DEPARTMENT OF UTILITY SERVICES PORTION OF COLLIER CREEK AND HARBOR POINT PHASE 2 & 3 WATER ASSESSMENT PROJECT FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL— RESOLUTION 4 Parcel # 31391800011000500004.0 Assessment= $5,940.80 Owner FROST, GEOFFREY T and LOREN L Secondary Owner #1 Secondary Owner #2 - ---- -- ---- -- Mailing Address 1076 STONE ST RAHWAY NJ 07065 Legal COLLIER CREEK ESTATES PHASE SIX - BLK E LOT 4 PBI 17-76 Site Address 203 HUNT CT Revision Date : 3/12/201,9 Parcel # 31391800011000500005.0 Assessment= $5,940.80 Owner FRANKLIN, RICHARD A Secondary Owner #1 Secondary Owner #2 Mailing Address - 756 LAYPORT DR SEBASTIAN FL 32958 Legal - COLLIER CREEK ESTATES PHASE SIX - BLK E LOT 5 PB1 17-76 Site Address 201 HUNT CT Revision Dale : 3/12/2019 Parcel # 31391800011000500006.0 Assessment= $5,940.80 Owner BRADSTREET, RONALD W (TR) Secondary Owner #1 Secondary Owner #2 Mailing Address PO BOX 7121 LACONIA NH 03247 Legal COLLIER CREEK ESTATES PHASE SIX - BLK E LOT 6'PBI 17-76 Site Address 208 AREGA ST Revision Date • 3/12/2019 391 Paee 16 of 20 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY — DEPARTMENT OF UTILITY SERVICES PORTION OF COLLIER CREEK AND HARBOR POINT — PHASE 2 & 3 WATER ASSESSMENT PROJECT FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL — RESOLUTION 4 Parcel # 31391800011000.500007.0 Assessment= $5,940.80 Owner Confidential Secondary Owner #1 Secondary Owner #2 Mailing Address Legal COLLIER CREEK ESTATES PHASE SIX - BLK E LOT 7 PBI 17-76 Site Address Revision Date : 3/12/2019 Parcel # 31391800011000500008.0 Assessment= _ $5,940.80 Owner HEINZ, DENNIS S & Secondary Owner #1 GREER, GRETA C Secondary Owner #2 Mailing Address 1369 OLD TOWN RD BLOCK ISLAND RI 02807 Legal COLLIER CREEK ESTATES PHASE SIX - BLK E LOT 8 PBI 17-76 Site Address 212 AREGA ST Revision Date : 3/12/2019 Parcel # 31391800011000500009.0 _ Assessment= $5,940.80 Owner TEMPESTA, MATTHEW Secondary Owner #1 Secondary Owner #2 Mailing Address 229 POND VIEW LN SMITHTOWN NY 11787 Legal COLLIER CREEK ESTATES PHASE SIX - BLK E LOT 9 PBI 17-76 Site Address 213 AREGA ST Revision Date • 3/12/2019 392 Parte 17 -of 20 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY — DEPARTMENT OF UTILITY SERVICES PORTION OF COWER CREEK AND HARBOR POINT- PHASE 2 & 3 WATER ASSESSMENT PROJECT FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL RESOLUTION 4 Parcel # 31391800011000500010.0 Assessment= $5;940.80 Owner LEMOI, RUSSELL G and PATRICIA M Secondary Owner #1_ Secondary Owner #2 Mailing Address 211 AREGA ST SEBASTIAN FL 32958 Legal COLLIER CREEK ESTATES PHASE SIX - 811( E LOT 10 PBI 17-76 • Site Address 211 AREGA ST Retsion Date : 3/12/2019 Parcel # 31391800011000500011.0 Assessment= $5,940.80_ _ Owner ZAIDI, SPED IRFAN (COTRS)(TOK) and MUNAWAR SULTANA (COTRS)(TOK) _ Secondary Owner «1 Secondary Owner «2 Mailing Address 209 AREGA STREET SEBASTIAN FL 32958 Legal COLLIER CREEK ESTATES PHASE SIX - BLK E LOT 11 PBI 17-76 Site Address 209 AREGA ST Revision Date : 3/12/2019 Parcel # 31391800011000500012.0 Assessment= $5,940.80 Owner FRANKLIN, RICHARD Secondary Owner #1 Secondary Owner #2 Mailing Address 756 LAYPORT DR SEBASTIAN FL 32958 Legal COLLIER CREEK ESTATES PHASE SIX - 811( E LOT 12 PBI 17-76 • Site Address 207 AREGA ST Revision Date : 3/12/2019 393 Pae 18 of 20 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF UTILITY SERVICES PORTION OF COLLIER .CREEK AND HARBOR POINT PHASE 2 & 3 WATER ASSESSMENT PROJECT FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL— RESOLUTION 4 Parcel it 31391800011000500.0.13.0 Assessment= $5,940.80 Owner MITCHELL, ITCHELL, SE AN P Secondary Owner #1 Secondary Owner #2 Mailing Address 82-76 61ST RD MIDDLE VILLAGE NY 11379 Legal COLLIER CREEK ESTATES PHASE SIX - BLK E LOT 13 PBI 17-76 Site Address 205 AREGA ST Revision Date : 3/12/2019 Parcel # 31391800011000500014.0 Assessment= $5,940.80 Owner KELLER, PATRICIAA and ARTHUR V Secondary Owner #1 _ Secondary Owner #2 Mailing Address 136 REGATTA ST MELBOURNE FL 32951 - - ---------------------- ---- -- - - Legal COLLIER CREEK ESTATES PHASE SIX - BLK E LOT 14 PBI 17-76 Site Address 203 AREGA ST Revision Date : 3/12/2019 Parcel # 31391800011000500015.0 Assessment= $5,940.80 Owner KELLER, PATRICIA A and ARTHUR V Secondary Owner 111 Secondary Owner #2 Mailing Address 136 REGATTA ST MELBOURNE FL 32951 Legal COLLIER CREEK ESTATES PHASE SIX - BLK E LOT 15 PBI 17-76 Site Address 201 AREGA ST Revision Date : 3/12/2019 394 'Pane 10 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF UTILITY SERVICES PORTION OF COLLIER CREEK AND HARBOR POINT _ PHASE 2 & 3 WATER ASSESSMENT PROJECT FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL— RESOLUTION 4 Parcel # 31391800011000500016.0 Assessment= $5,940.80 Owner WEISMAN, RICHARD & DIANE Secondary Owner #1 Secondary Owner #2 Mailing Address 202 BANKS CT SEBASTIAN FL32958-6551 Legal COLLIER CREEK ESTATES PHASE SIX - BLK E LOT 16 PBI 17-76 Site Address 202 BANKS CT Revision Date : 3/1212019 Parcel # 31391800011000500017.0 Assessment= $5,940.80 Owner Confidential Secondary Owner #1 Secondary Owner #2 Mailing Address • Legal COLLIER CREEK ESTATES PHASE SIX- BLK E LOT 17 PBI 17-76 Site Address Revision Date : 3/12/2019 Parcel # 31391800011000500018.0 Assessment= $5,940.80 Owner HUBBART, LOIS & JOHN Secondary Owner #1 MARTIN, JOHN Secondary Owner #2 Mailing Address 5547 3RD RD LAKEWORTH FL 33467 Legal COLLIER CREEK ESTATES PHASE SIX - BLK E LOT 18 PBI 17-76 Site Address 201 BANKS CT Revision Date : 3/12/2019 395 Paeee220 of 20 County Attorney's Matters - B.C.C. 3.26.19 Office of INDIAN RIVER COUNTY ATTORNEY Dylan Reingold, County Attorney William K. DeBraal, Deputy County Attorney Kate Pingolt Cotner, Assistant County Attorney MEMORANDUM TO: Board of County Commissioners FROM: Dylan Reingold, County Attorney DATE: March 18, 2019 SUBJECT: First Amendment to Water, Wastewater and Reclaimed Water Franchise Agreement Between The City of Fellsmere and Indian River County BACKGROUND On December 4, 2018, the Indian River County Board of County Commissioners (the "Board") approved a water, wastewater and reclaimed water franchise agreement with the City of Fellsmere (the "Agreement"). Pursuant to section 9 of the Agreement, the service area described in the Agreement can be expanded to include lands by amendments approved by the City Council of the City of Fellsmere and the Board. The owner of 12.655 acres of property located southeast of I-95 and CR 512 is seeking to annex into the City of Fellsmere. The first reading of the annexation ordinance is scheduled for March 21St. The property owner wishes to be served by the Indian River County Department of Utility Services. Thus, the County Attorney's Office has drafted this first amendment to the Agreement (the "Amendment"), which will expand the service area under the Agreement to serve this property. FUNDING There is no direct funding requirement for the Amendment. As required in the Agreement, Indian River County Department of Utility Services will collect and transmit to the City Fellsmere their utility tax and franchise fee split. The County split franchise fee will be collected and transferred to the general fund account. RECOMMENDATION The County Attorney's Office recommends that the Indian River County Board of County Commissioners authorize the Chairman to execute the Amendment. ATTACHMENTS First Amendment to Water, Wastewater and Reclaimed Water Franchise Agreement C l UsersllegislarlAppDa(alLocallTempIBCL TechnolopesleasvPDF 81@BCL@800E8ADE1@BCLQ800E8ADE.dac 396 FIRST AMENDMENT TO WATER, WASTEWATER AND RECLAIMED WATER FRANCHISE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF FELLSMERE, FLORIDA AND INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA THIS FIRST AMENDMENT TO WATER, WASTEWATER AND RECLAIMED WATER FRANCHISE AGREEMENT (hereinafter "Amendment") is entered into as of the day of , 2019, (hereinafter "Effective Date") by and between the City of Fellsmere, Florida (hereinafter "FELLSMERE") and Indian River County, Florida (hereinafter "COUNTY"). WHEREAS, on December 4, 2018, FELLSMERE and COUNTY entered into a Water, Wastewater, and Reclaimed Water Franchise Agreement (the "Agreement'), which allowed COUNTY to provide water, wastewater and reclaimed water utility services within those portions of the corporate limits of FELLSMERE in which it is more beneficial for the COUNTY to serve; WHEREAS, FELLSMERE and COUNTY wish to expand the Service Area set forth in the Agreement to include the property described in the attached Exhibit "A"; NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and the mutual benefits to be derived from compliance by the parties with the covenants contained herein, and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged by the parties, the parties agree as follows: Section 1. Adoption of "Whereas" Clauses. The foregoing "Whereas" clauses are adopted and incorporated herein. Section 2. Franchise Service Area Boundary Change. Pursuant to section 9 of the Agreement, the Service Area is expanded to include the property described in the attached Exhibit "A". Section 3. Other Agreement Provisions. All other provisions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. Section 4. Effective Date. This Amendment shall not be effective until the property described in Exhibit "A' is annexed into FELLSMERE. SIGNATURE PAGE FOLLOWS Page 1 of 2 397 IN WITNESS THEREOF, the parties have set their hands and seals the date entered below. ATTEST: CITY OF FELLSMERE By: Deborah C. Krages Mayor City Clerk (SEAL) Date: Reviewed as to form and legal sufficiency: Warren W. Dill City Attorney BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA By: Bob Solari, Chairman Date: Approved by BCC: ATTEST: Jeffrey R. Smith, Clerk of Circuit Court and Comptroller By: Deputy Clerk APPROVED BY: Jason E. Brown, County Administrator APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGAL SUFFICIENCY Dylan Reingold, County Attorney Page 2 of 2 398 LEGAL DESCRIPTION METES AND BOUNDS PER SURVEYOR COMMENCE AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 20, TOWNSHIP 31 SOUTH, RANGE 38 EAST, INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA; THENCE SOUTH 00°15'40" WEST ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4, A DISTANCE OF 108.65 FEET TO A POINT ON THE SOUTH RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF STATE ROAD #512 AS SHOWN ON FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION MAP SECTION 88081-2403; THENCE NORTH 88°16'13" EAST ALONG THE SAID SOUTH RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF STATE ROAD #512, A DISTANCE OF 390.23 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THE HEREIN DESCRIBED PARCEL; FROM SAID POINT OF BEGINNING, CONTINUE NORTH 88°16'13" EAST ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE A DISTANCE OF 300.20 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE WEST LINE OF BLOCK B, VERO LAKE ESTATES UNIT H-4, ACCORDING TO PLAT THEREOF AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 6, PAGE 31, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA. THENCE NORTH 00°21'47" EAST ALONG THE SAID WEST LINE OF BLOCK B A DISTANCE OF 3.94 FEET TO A POINT OF CURVATURE OF A CIRCULAR CURVE; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE, HAVING A RADIUS OF 25.00 FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 90°15'55", FOR AN ARC LENGTH OF 39.39 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTH LINE OF SAID BLOCK B AND A POINT OF TANGENCY; THENCE SOUTH 89°22'18" EAST ALONG THE SAID NORTH LINE OF BLOCK B AND BLOCK A OF SAID VERO LAKE ESTATES UNIT H-4 A DISTANCE OF 548.80 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE WEST RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF 106TH AVENUE AS SHOWN ON THE SAID PLAT OF VERO LAKE ESTATES UNIT H-4 AND A POINT OF CURVATURE OF A CIRCULAR CURVE; THENCE ALONG SAID WEST RIGHT OF WAY LINE SOUTHEASTERLY AND ALONG SAID CURVE, HAVING A RADIUS OF 25.00 FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 89°45'07", FOR AN ARC LENGTH OF 39.16 FEET TO A POINT OF TANGENCY; THENCE CONTINUE ALONG SAID WEST RIGHT OF WAY SOUTH 00°22'49" WEST A DISTANCE OF 501.90 FEET TO A POINT OF CURVATURE OF A CIRCULAR CURVE; THENCE CONTINUE ALONG SAID WEST RIGHT OF WAY AND SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE, HAVING A RADIUS OF 25.00 FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 89°50'14", FOR AN ARC LENGTH OF 39.20 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTH RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF 94TH STREET AS SHOWN ON THE SAID PLAT OF VERO LAKE ESTATES UNIT H-4 AND A POINT OF TANGENCY; THENCE NORTH 89°46'57" WEST ALONG SAID NORTH RIGHT OF WAY UNE A DISTANCE OF 1187.76 FEET TO A POINT OF CURVATURE OF A CIRCULAR CURVE; THENCE NORTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE, HAVING A RADIUS OF 25.00 FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 90°02'37", FOR AN ARC LENGTH OF 39.29 FEET TO A POINT ON THE EAST RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF 108TH AVENUE AS SHOWN ON THE SAID PLAT OF VERO LAKE ESTATES UNIT H-4 AND A POINT OF TANGENCY; THENCE NORTH 00°15'40" EAST ALONG SAID EAST RIGHT OF WAY LINE A DISTANCE OF 162.63 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89051'26" EAST A DISTANCE OF 339.99 FEET; THENCE NORTH 00°15'40" EAST A DISTANCE OF 328.66 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. SAID PARCEL CONTAINS 551,268.1 SQUARE FEET OR 12.655 ACRES MORE OR LESS. 399 Exhibit A ('N O Existing 1"=1,000' RaceTrac Site L TSG Site (Hatched) -6 c N G.R. 512 (Fellsmere Rd) O j!; '✓_'' _ ; Lir Jou j j 4 ��frM1 A O ‘..._. a) Goth St G4ti St il Q Gerd 5t Limits of Gerd St Annexation 4 g (Shaded) -o G2ncq St dN O G2nc St 05 4 gist 5t 4 < Gist 5t S O MMASTELLER & MOILER, INC. Location Mapcor�u.nWc Tractor Supply Company City of Fellsmere 02/28/2o1a Sheet No. cacr i $iosiel " a � � �-�°° F"X � � �*-' .,,,,,,,....,„4 ----1_ 1 r ----/--57I7512(iesmereRoad) ~-1-------- ----__--_-----------__._-- _� (R/W Varies) ----- _ ___`-------------- (_ c=== II ,- — -- �, EE:::Z7}---------- (- n c Q— 1 ' r____ — _- -- m'Zs—— `. olaceTrac I N ' Existing Site I ` I II �� II II II II 1I• J \ 1 / \ I I \---------------------- 1 ---- ___ ----------------- ----- '------ 94th Street — (60' R/W) m j Q p 1 o U L 0� �f h o� I o U w �� i rliN IZIF 1"=150' 106th Avenue _ — (80 RNVL _._ �IASTELLER & IAOLER, INC.Sheet MLimits of Annexation No. ��^�H ��w Sir - z ,, , gym, �-�°° F gym, �°-� Tractor Supply Company City of Felismere 02/28/2019 2 3 March 26, 2019 ITEM 14.D.1 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS INTER -OFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: Members of the Board of County Commissioners DATE: March 15, 2019 SUBJECT: Request to Paint a Mural at the Main Library FROM: Peter O'Bryan Commissioner, District 4 Commissioners: I request the Board to consider a request from the Learning Alliance / Moonshot Moment to paint an environmental -themed mural at the Main Library Thanks. 402 Good Morning Mr. O'Bryan, The Learning Alliance in partnership with the School District of Indian River County, SEA a Difference/ORCA and a local teaching artist is planning a Moonshot Community in Action Network (MCAN) event at the Main Library in Vero Beach on Saturday, May 4th. This event will consist of booths for families to visit that will have interactive stations educating them about our Lagoon and the issues we are facing. The purpose of the event is to make visible how we are a Moonshot Community in Action and showcasing how literacy helps address solving challenges related to the lagoon and calls people to action. As the focal point of this day and in coordination with the local mural project, the teaching artist will facilitate families to complete a mural for the library. The library has given permission for the use of the parking lot and to create a temporary mural that will be placed into the library. The request that we are asking for is permission to have the mural painted on a wall, either exterior or on the interior hallway or children's section wall. I am beginning this request with you to see if this needs to be put on a County Commission agenda or is there another avenue that we need to proceed? The date is quickly approaching, so this does have some urgency in the need to move forward on how to proceed. I look forward to your quick response, feel free to call my cell phone for further details. Teri Barenborg Kids at Hope Treasure Hunter School Board Member District #4 School District of Indian River County 772-564-3083 office 772-925-5398 cell This is the day that we make a difference for children. Under Florida's "Public Records" law, absent a specific exclusion, written communications to or from the School District of Indian River County employees are considered public records. E-mail communication with this correspondent may be subject to public and/or media disclosure upon request. 403 From: Patti Fuchs <pfuchs(ciirclibrary.org> Date: Tue, Mar 12, 2019 at 10:57 AM Subject: Mural Event To: Tracey Wehking <twehking(a�irclibrary.org>, Tanya Huff <thufffn,irclibrary.org> Update on the Mural Event: The vision of the event is to create a touchstone for a larger initiative that connects protecting the lagoon with literacy. The mural will be painted at the event by members of the public. (think "paint by numbers") The mural design will be by a local artist using artwork created by children around the county involved in Learning Alliance/Moonshot programs. The mural is reportedly going to be in the style of Keith Haring. Besides the painting of the mural, the Learning Alliance and up to four local environmental organizations, will be providing hands-on activities. The mural and activities (tables/tents) will be set up outside, on the SE lawn. In case of inclement weather they can be moved inside of the large meeting room. There will be a live Mermaid photo op which will take place inside the Children's Dept Story Time room. The Moonshot Rocket Bus will be in attendance and parked in the parking lot, adjacent to the activities. That will be the only use of the actual parking lot. The activities will all take place either on the lawn or inside. The event will take place from 10:30 to 1:30. We are still confirming a date, but it will be either May 4th or May 1 lth. That confirmation will be coming very shortly. c. Regarding the locations of the mural, they would ideally like for it to be permanent and outside. The SE corner would probably be the ideal location. They have made the argument that the murals in downtown Vero are multiplying. They will be promoting a walking tour of the murals, and argue that this would be a great way to bring people to the library. Patti Fuchs Children's Librarian Indian River County Library System 772 770 5060 ext 4132 404 March 26, 2019 ITEM 14.E.1 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS INTER -OFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: Members of the Board of County Commissioners DATE: March 21, 2019 SUBJECT: Regulatory and tax fairness as it relates to the car rental and peer-to-peer car sharing industries FROM: Tim Zorc Commissioner, District 3 Discussion Item: I'd like to discuss regulatory and tax fairness as it relates to the car rental and peer-to-peer car sharing industries. I would ask that the Clerk of Court monitor this emerging tax issue just as he monitors short- term rentals. 405 Coalition Advocates for Regulatory & Tax Fairness within Car Rental & Peer -to -Peer Car -Sharing Industries March 19, 2019 TALLAHASSEE, Fla. --(BUSINESS WIRE) --Mar 19, 2019 --`Driving Florida Forward' today launched an effort to advocate for regulatory and tax fairness within the car rental and peer-to-peer car -sharing industries during the 2019 Legislative Session. `Driving Florida Forward' is advocating for forward -thinking legislative changes that would ensure uniformity for all car rental and peer-to-peer car -sharing operators on car rentals, airport regulations and taxes remitted, as well as put customer transparency and safety first. "The Florida Association of Counties believes it is in Floridians' best interest to have a fair regulatory structure in place for the car rental and peer-to-peer car sharing industries," said Hendry County Commissioner Karson Turner, president of the Florida Association of Counties, which is a member of Driving Florida Forward. "By holding peer-to-peer car sharing services to the same standard that apply to traditional car sharing companies, local governments can create a safe and responsible environment for these companies and new emerging technologies to thrive." Florida is known as a leader in technology and innovation, setting the stage for new and emerging technologies and exploring unique and innovative ways to bring goods and services to Floridians and those who visit the Sunshine State. One example of this is the peer-to-peer car -sharing platforms that have seen growth in recent years. "The Auto Rental Association of South Florida supports legislation this session that addresses how the peer-to-peer car -sharing industry in Florida is regulated and taxed," said Ed Bernal, vice president of the Auto Rental Association of South Florida, which is a member of Driving Florida Forward. "For nearly 5o years, we've witnessed how our industry has transformed thanks to forward -thinking and innovative ideas. However, with this everchanging industry, it is also important to make sure everyone in the car rental and peer-to-peer car -sharing businesses are playing by the same rules and regulations. This session, we join `Driving Florida Forward' in asking that all car rental and peer-to-peer car -sharing operators are looked at equally for what they are — car rentals." Legislation has been filed in the Florida Senate (Senate Bill 1148 by Senator Keith Perry (R -Gainesville)) and Florida House of Representatives (House Bill 1111 by Representative Chris Latvala (R -Clearwater)) relating to the Vehicles for Rent or Lease. 406 Driving Florida Forward is asking the Florida Legislature to address the following tenets as they consider legislation regarding peer-to-peer car -sharing platforms and traditional car rentals: 1. Clarify that the use of a vehicle by a person who does not own it for compensation — through a website or at a counter — is still.a "rental transaction;" 2. Allow for fair competition among long-standing and new methods of renting vehicles; and 3. Ensure taxes owed to the state for facilitating a rental transaction are remitted. "A rental is a rental is a rental — it is as simple as that," said Brewster Bevis, senior vice president of state and federal affairs of Associated Industries of Florida, which is a member of Driving Florida Forward. "An equitable and level playing field does not stifle innovation, but there is a legal framework that should be followed for everyone in an industry. If you are marketing your company as a car rental service, then you should operate under the same regulatory and tax framework as those you are competing with in the industry." "We are proud to be part of such a diverse and forward -thinking coalition like this," said Alan Levine, president and general manager for Enterprise Holdings in Florida. "Not only are we all working together to put financial transparency and consumer fairness out front and center in Florida, but we also want to make sure that local as well as out-of-town car rental customers are properly protected whenever safety recalls are involved." Also in support of `Driving Florida Forward' is the American Car Rental Association and Hertz Corporation. SB 1148, by Senator Perry, has been referred to the Senate Infrastructure and Security Committee; Appropriations Subcommittee on Transportation, Tourism and Economic Development; and Appropriations Committee. HB 1111, by Representative Latvala, has been referred to the House Transportation and Infrastructure Subcommittee, Transportation and Tourism Appropriations Subcommittee, and State Affairs Committee. View source version on businesswire.com:https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/2o1902 19005947/e LIZ CONTACT: Sarah Bascom,sarah@bascomllc.com, 850.294.6636 Kristen Bridges,kristen@bascomllc.com, 850.545.1917 407 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL DISTRICT BOARD MEMORANDUM Date: March 15, 2019 To: Jason E. Brown, County Administrator From: Vincent Burke, P.E., Director of Utility Services Prepared By: Himanshu H. Mehta, P.E., Managing Director, Solid Waste Disposal District Subject: Change Order No. 3 to Thalle (Bid #2018025) DESCRIPTIONS AND CONDITIONS: On April 10, 2018, the Indian River County (IRC) Solid Waste Disposal District (SWDD) awarded Bid No. 2018025 in the amount of $16,034,260.00 to Thalle Construction Company (Thalle), Inc. of Hillsborough, North Carolina, for the construction of the Landfill Segment 3 Cell 2 Expansion, Segment 2 Partial Closure and Landfill Gas System Expansion project. A Notice to Proceed (NTP) was issued on May 9, 2018. Substantial completion of Segment 2 Partial Closure and Landfill Gas System Expansion phase (Milestone 1) is 180 calendar days (November 5, 2018), and substantial completion of Landfill Segment 3 Cell 2 Expansion phase (Milestone 2) is 360 calendar days (May 4, 2019) from the NTP. Final completion is 390 calendar days (June 3, 2019) from the NTP. On September 17, 2018, Thalle submitted a request to our engineer, CDM Smith, for a 105 -days -in -contract - time extension for Milestone 1, identifying wet conditions as a basis for this request. On November 5, 2018, the SWDD Board approved Change Order No. 1 to Thalle extending Milestone 1 to February 18, 2019. On February 12, 2019, the SWDD Board approved Change Order No. 2 to ThaIle for a deductive change order in the amount of $2,659,127.14 as a result of direct purchase items resulting in a revised contract amount of $13,375,132.86. Our project engineer, CDM Smith, has reviewed and recommended approval of a request for rain days and additional work associated with the project under this request for Change Order No. 3. ANALYSIS: CDM Smith reviewed the request and submitted a recommendation letter on March 15, 2019, to approve the request by Thalle for additional rain days and additional work associated with this project. The additional work is associated with the installation of an underdrain along the bottom edge of the liner that ties into the original Segment 1 project that is closed to 1-95. This original cell was closed with a clay cap and this new underdrain will help protect the transition from the new liner to the existing clay by diverting water away from it. The proposed work includes a budget of $12,236.97 and four (4) additional work days. Per CDM Smith, the new Milestone 1 date would be moved from February 18, 2019, to March 17, 2019 to account for 23 additional days due to rain and 4 additional days for the underdrain work. Similarly, Milestone 2 and final completion dates are respectively changed by 27 days to May 31, 2019 and June 30, 2019 . The total contract price is unchanged as there is contingency funding available to cover the additional cost. Staff supports the recommendation from CDM Smith. @BCL@300E4AF2.docx 408 Page 1 of 2 FUNDING: The Segment 3 Cell 2 Expansion and Segment 2 Partial Closure projects are funded from separate revenue sources; 'specifically, the closure cost is paid from an escrow account long established per Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) requirements. The additional underdrain work is associated with the closure project. The total contract price is unchanged as thereis contingency funding available to cover the additional cost. Iffli)(n.2018025 .THALLE GONSTRUGTION GOMPANY GE, DESCRIPTION AGGOUNT AMOUNT Construction — Segment 3 Cell 2 Expansion 411-169000-17025 - Construction — Segment 2 Closure 411-239006 (Escrow) $ 12,236.97 Change Order No. 3 $ 12,236.97 RECOMMENDATION: Solid Waste Disposal District staff recommends that its Board approve and authorize the Chairman to execute the change order in contract time for Milestone 1, Milestone 2 and Final Completion by 27 days and allow the use of $12,236.97 from contingency funding to Thalle Construction Company, Inc. for the Segment 3 CeII 2 Expansion, Segment 2 Partial Closure and Landfill Gas System Expansion project. ATTACHMENT: 1. CDM Smith Letter of Recommendation and Change Order Form @BCL@300E4AF2.docx 409 Page 2 of 2 I CDM Smith 1701 Highway A 1 A Suite 301 Vero Beach, Florida 32963 tel: 772 2314301 fax: 772 2314332 March 21, 2019 Mr. Himanshu Mehta, P.E. Managing Director Solid Waste Disposal District 1325 74th Ave SW Vero Beach, FL 32968 Reoelvedby SWDD MAR 21 2019 Indian River County Landfill Subject: Indian River County Solid Waste Disposal District. Segment 3 Cell 2 Expansion, Segment 2 Partial Closure, and Landfill Gas System Expansion IRC Contract No.: 2018025 Change Order No. 3 — Rain Delays and Additional Closure Drain Dear Mr. Mehta: Transmitted herewith are three copies of the Change Order Number 3 which grants the contractor 27 additional days for Milestone 1, the Segment 2 partial closure activity, Milestone 2, Segment 3 Cell expansion and the final completion. Twenty-three of the days are granted for work that was impacted by rain and wet working conditions. While rain is not always a cause for delay on typical construction projects, it is more impactful to operations on the placement of fill and working on the landfill sideslopes. Four additional days are associated with the installation of an underdrain along the bottom edge of the liner that ties into Segment 1. Note the existing Segment 1 was previously closed with clay and this underdrain will help protect the transition from the new LLDPE liner to the existing clay by capturing water and diverting it to the stormwater downcomers. This portion of the change order will move $12,236.97 from contingency to the project budget without a change to the overall contract of the project. We trust the enclosed is sufficient for your review and the Board's approval. If you need any additional information or clarification, please do not hesitate to contact our office. Sincerely, Martin J. Lewis, P.E., BCEE, PMP Project Manager CDM Smith Inc. MJL/jj 410 WATER + ENVIRONMENT+TRANSPORTATION + ENERGY + FACILITIES CSmith Mr. Himanshu Mehta, P.E. March 21, 2019 Page 2 Attachment File: PW PL1 6706-228608.05.06.70 cc: Eric Grotke, CDM Smith Kevin Vann, CDM Smith Reinaldo Gonzalez, Thalle 411 ij24 3.do« © 2018 CDM Smith 6706-221060 All Rights Reserved Issued for Bid/January 2018 Indian River County Landfill, CHANGE ORDER No. 03 Project: Segment 3 Cell 2 Expansion, Segment 2 Partial Closure, and PROJECT Landfill Gas System Expansion 113 DATE OF ISSUANCE March 21, 2019 EFFECTIVE DATE March 26, 2019 OWNER Indian River County OWNER'S Contract No. IRC Bid No. 2018025 CDM Smith Project No. 6706- 228608 CONTRACTOR Thalle Construction Co., Inc. ENGINEER CDM Smith Inc. You are directed to make the following changes in the Contract Documents: Description: 27 day extension to the Milestone 1, Milestone 2 and Final Completion Time Reason for change order: Wet weather conditions and side slope working conditions. Additional Drainagai Attachments: (List documents sunnorting chance) CHANGE IN CONTRACT PRICE Original Contract Price $ 16.034.260.00 CHANGE IN CONTRACT TIME Original Contract Times Milestone 1 - November 5, 2018 Substantial Completion: 5/4/2019 Ready for final payment: 6/3/2019 Days or dates Net changes from previous Change Orders No.1 to No. 2 Net change from previous Change Orders No. 1 to No. 2 $ -$2,659,127.14 Milestone 1 + 105 days days Contract Price prior to this Change Order $ 13,375,132.86 Contract Time prior to this Change Order Milestone 1 - February 18, 2019 Substantial Completion: No change Ready for final payment: No Change Days or dates Net Increase(decrease) in tlhis Change Order Move $12,236.97 from contingency into active $ project, no change to overall contract price. Net Increase in this Change Order Milestones + 27 days; MS -1 =3/17/2019, MS -2 = .5/31/2019, Final Completion = 6/30/2019 Contract Price with all approved Change Orders $ 13 375.132.86 Contract Time with all approved Change Orders Substantial Completion: 5/31/2019 Ready for final payment: 6/30/2019 Days or dates RECOM By: APPROVED: ACC By: ENG ER (Au iorized Signature) OWNER (Authorized Signature) CONTRACTOR Signature) Date: 03/21/2019 Date: Date: rized 3121 2a(.9 EJCDC No. C-800 (2007 Edition) Prepared by the Engineers Joint Contract Documents Committee and endorsed by The Associated General CONTRACTORs of America. Conformed - May 2018 Supplementary Condiiifis 0080IS - INDIAN RIVER COUNTY SEGMENT 3 CELL 2 EXPANSION, SEGMENT 2 PARTIAL CLOSURE, AND LANDFILL GAS SYSTEM EXPANSION Rain Delays CDM Smith Project No. 6706-228608 Date Thalle Rain Log Republic Rain Log Vero Beach Airport' CDM Smith Rec. 01 -Nov -18 Trace 0.04 0 02 -Nov -18 Trace 1.1 0.27 0 03 -Nov -18 0.7 0.6 0 0 04 -Nov -18 0.6 0.61_ 0_ 05 -Nov -18 Trace 1 06 -Nov -18 Trace 1 07 -Nov -18 Trace _ 0 08 -Nov -18 0.1 0.2 1 09 -Nov -18 Trace 1 10 -Nov -18 Trace 0 11 -Nov -18 Trace 0.1 0 12 -Nov -18 1.1 0.8 0.32 0 13 -Nov -18 1.5 0.6 0.02 1 14 -Nov -18 Trace 1 15 -Nov -18 Trace 0.1 0.1 1 16 -Nov -18 Trace _ 0 17 -Nov -18 Trace 0 18 -Nov -18 Trace 0 19 -Nov -18 Trace 0.1 0.04 0 20 -Nov -18 Trace 0:82 0 21 -Nov -18 Trace 0.01 0 22 -Nov -18 Trace 0 23 -Nov -18 Trace 0 24 -Nov -18 Trace 0.8 0.6 0 25 -Nov -18 Trace 0 26 -Nov -18 Trace 0 27 -Nov -18 0.6 3.4 2:66 1 28 -Nov -18 Trace 0.01 0 29 -Nov -18 Trace 0 30 -Nov -18 Trace 0 Thalle Requested Days 10 Subtotal Days Recommended: Notes: CDfil 8 March 07, 2019 Date Tholle Rain Log Republic Roln Log Vero Beach Airport CDM Smith Rec. 01 -Dec -18 Trace 0.04 0 02 -Dec -18 Trace 0 03 -Dec -18 Trace 0.6 0 0 04 -Dec -18 0.06 0.06 1 05 -Dec -18 Trace 0 06 -Dec -18 Trace 0 07 -Dec -18 Trace 0 08 -Dec -18 Trace 0 09 -Dec -18 0.1 0 10 -Dec -18 Trace 0 11 -Dec -18 Trace 0 12 -Dec -18 Trace 0.8 0 13 -Dec -18 0.1 0.2 0.01 1 - 14 -Dec -18 Trace 0 15 -Dec -18 0.6 0 16 -Dec -18 Trace 0 17 -Dec -18 Trace 0 18 -Dec -18 Trace 0 19 -Dec -18 0.1 0.1 0.04 0 20 -Dec -18 0.9 0:82 _ 1 21 -Dec -18 0.1 0.01 1 22 -Dec -18 Trace 0 23 -Dec -18 Trace 0 24 -Dec -18 Trace 0.8 0.6 0 25 -Dec -18 Trace 0 26 -Dec -18 Trace 0 27 -Dec -18 Trace 3.4 2:66 0 28 -Dec -18 0.1_ 0.01 0 29 -Dec -18 Trace 0 30 -Dec -18 Trace 0 31 -Dec -18 Trace 0 Thalle Requested Days 8 Claimed Days By Thalle Vero Beach Airport Referenced for comparison only Subtotal Days Recommended: 4 Total Thalle Requested Days: 33 Date Thalle Rain Lo g Republic Rain Lo g Vero Beach Airport* CDM Smith Rec. 01 -Jan -19 Trace 0.04 0 02 -Jan -19 Trace 0 03 -Jan -19 0.5 0.03 1 04 -Jan -19 0.01 0.1 0 05 -Jan -19 Trace 0 06 -Jan -19 Trace 0 07 -Jan -19 Trace 0 08 -Jan -19 Trace 0 09 -Jan -19 Trace 0 10 -Jan -19 Trace 0 11 -Jan -19 Trace 0 12 -Jan -19 Trace 0.8 0 13 -Jan -19 Trace 0.5 0.89 0 14 -Jan -19 Trace 0 15 -Jan -19 Trace 0 16 -Jan -19 Trace 0 17 -Jan -19 Trace 0 18 -tan -19 Trace 0 19 -Jan -19 0.4 0.1 0 20 -Jan -19 0.25 0.23 0 21 -Jan -19 Trace 0 22 -Jan -19 Trace 0 23 -Jan -19 0.01 0 24 -Jan -19 1.1 0.8 0.6 1 25 -Jan -19 1 1 26 -Jan -19 1.1 0 27 -Jan -19 2.4 3.4 2:66 1 28 -Jan -19 Trace 1 29 -Jan -19 0.2 1 30 -Jan -19 Trace 1 31 -Jan -19 Trace 0 Thalle Requested Days 9 Subtotal Days Recommended: 7 Dote Thalle Rain to g Republic Rain to g Vero Beach Airport* CDM Smith Rec. 01 -Feb -19 Trace 0.04 0 02 -Feb -19 Trace 0 03 -Feb -19 Trace 0 04 -Feb -19 Trace 0 05 -Feb -19 Trace 0 06 -Feb -19 Trace 0 07 -Feb -19 Trace 0 08 -Feb -19 Trace 0 09 -Feb -19 Trace 0 10 -Feb -19 Trace 0 11 -Feb -19 Trace 0 12 -Feb -19 0.01 0.8 13 -Feb -19 1.1 0.5 0.89 1 14 -Feb -19 Trace 1 15 -Feb -19 Trace 0 16 -Feb -19 Trace 0 17 -Feb -19 Trace 0 18 -Feb -19 Trace 0 19 -Feb -19 Trace 0 20 -Feb -19 Trace 0 21 -Feb -19 Trace 0 22 -Feb -19 Trace 0 23 -Feb -19 Trace 0 24 -Feb -19 Trace 0.01 0 25 -Feb -19 Trace 0 26 -Feb -19 0.01 0 27 -Feb -19 1.1 0.5 ' 0.85 1 28 -Feb -19 Trace 1 Thalle Requested Days 6 Subto al Days Recommended: Total Rain Days Recommended by CDM Smith: 23 Extension of time associated with Toe Drain on Segment I: 4 Total Recommended Days Extension to Milestone 1: 27 413 77RSOR Nnv flpr. Ian and FPh Rain 1 nvc.xic THA LEE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY A TULLY GROUP COMPANY Established 1947 February 14, 2019 VIA EMAIL: LewisMJ@cdmsmith.com Martin Lewis, P.E., BCEE Construction/Project Manager CDM ,Smith, Inc. 1701 Florida A1A #301 Vero Beach, Florida 32963 Subject: Project: Indian River County Landfill Segment 3 Cell 2 Expansion, Segment 2 Partial Closure. And Landfill Gas System Expansion. West Slope Toe Drain Dear Mr. Lewis, In response to the Request for Proposal received on February 7, 2019, Thalle is pleased to present this proposalfor furnishing all labor, equipment, materials and incidentals to perform the additional work for placing a toe drain on the west slope. It is to be noted that the toe drain to be installed is quoted with pipe and geotextile only. The installation of rock is not included in this proposal. Ifit is found that rock needs to be installed, Thalle will provide an additional cost for installing the rock. The total price for the additional work requested by CDM Smith $12,236.97 (twelve thousand two hundred thirty-six thousand dollars and ninety-seven cents). Attached to this letter is the breakdown of the $12,236.97 (twelve thousand two hundred thirty-six thousand dollars and ninety-seven cents). For this additional work Thalle is requesting 4 days in contract time extension. Find attached the price breakdown. If you have any further questions or concerns, do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, einaldo Gonzalez, PM Thalle Construction cc. Chris Haverstrom P.E. , Thalle Himanshu H. Mehta P.E. , TRC Dan Lauth, CDM Smith Amy M. Hightower, P.E. , CDM Smith 900 NC Highway 86 North, Hillsborough, NC 27278 1 office: 919.245.1490 I fax: 919.241.1659 ( www.thalle414 THALLE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY A TULLY GROUP COMPANY THALLE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY1INC. Indian River County Segment 3 Cell 2 Expamsiom, Segni ent 2 Parti dh hnsure, ani! Landfill Gas SystemlExpansion IiEErti: Orme Buffet Area- Existing Lift Station DATE Established 1947 14 -Feb -,19 DESCRIPTION QTY UJB my APT.OUNT IABOR Supenintentfen i 32:00 Iktlf1 $ 45.42 $ 1,453.44 Operators 36.00 GMhE $ 32.00 $ 1,1521)D Lalborer5 24.00 IM}E $ 22.00 $ 528.00 SUB TOTAL $ 3,133.49 EQUfPMEfJT Polaris- 6 Seater 32.00 EH 4.92 157.44 Kornatsu(61 4.00 EH s 2807 $ 112.28 CAT 308 32.00 EH $ 17.50 $ 560.00 Nand T0015 32.00 EH $ 14.00 $ 448.00 Can partn.r 32.00 EH $ 38.88 $ 1;244.16 Fuel 1.00 LS $ 530100 $ 530.00 SUB -TOTAL S 3,051.88 MATERIALS AND SUBCONTRACTOR 4" Preferated Pipe 1260 LF $ 1.10 $ 1,33600 'Geoter file Fdli rir Boz 1 EA . $ 870.55 ;. 870.55 ,GeotexrilefatrAc8oz. FE.D 1 EA $ S35.00 $ 375.00 SUB TOTAL $ 2,631.55 SUB-10TALLs $ 8,816.87 OVERTIME FACTOR 011 1.A80I 10% 10% $ 313.34 LABOR BoURDEPO 48.21% $ 1,510.63 SUB -TOTALS S 10,640.35 15% MARK UP $ 1,596.13 TOTAL $ 12,236097 900 NC Highwoy 86 North, Hillsborough, NC 27278 1 office: 919.245.1490 1 Fox: 919.241.1659 1 wrwa.Ihalle4.1r5