Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1994-068RESOLUTION NO. 94- 68 RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA AMENDING THE DEVELOPMENT ORDER (D.O.) APPROVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS FOR _ THE HARBOR TOWN CENTER MALL DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT (D.R.I.). WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 380 Florida Statutes, the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida has adopted Resolution No. 89-31A (adopted March 28, 1989) establishing the Development Order approving the Harbor Town Center Mall Development of Regional Impact, and has adopted Resolution No. 89-128 (adopted September 26, 1989) amending said Development Order, and has adopted Resolution No. 92-13 (adopted January 28, 1992) amending said Development Order, and has adopted Resolution No. 94-1 (adopted January 4, 1994), and WHEREAS, Attorney Steve L. Henderson on behalf of the project developer, CBL & Associates Properties, Inc., has formally applied for and has agreed to certain language changes within the Development Order (D.O.) relating to certain traffic conditions, and WHEREAS, the Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council and Department of Community Affairs have indicated no objections to approving the request and have indicated that the request does not constitute a substantial deviation, NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida that: 1. The Board of County Commissioners finds that the requested and proposed changes to the Development Order do not constitute a substantial deviation, pursuant to Chapter 380 Florida Statutes. 2. The notification of proposed change application and materials submitted on behalf of the developer, including the transportation analysis performed by Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. dated October 1993, and including subsequent and related staff and applicant correspondence, are hereby incorporated by reference into the Application for Development Approval (ADA) for the project. 3. All conditions and restrictions specified in the project Development Order (Resolution No. 89-31A, and as amended by Resolution No. 89-128, Resolution No. 92-13, and Resolution No. 94-1), shall remain in full force and effect. 4. Development Order condition $32, as found in Resolution 89- 31A, is hereby amended as follows: 1132. No site plan shall be released and no building permits shall be issued for any portion of the Harbor Town Center project until contracts have been let by the County for the following intersection improvements, including traffic signal installation and/or modifications as warranted by the City, County, or State criteria: a. US 1/49th Street Eastbound one right -turn lane Coding: Words in ® type are deletions from existing law. Words underlined are additions. RESOLUTION NO. 94-f b. US 1/53rd Street signalization warrant analysis; and Eastbound one left -turn lane C. US 1/CR 510 Westbound one left -turn lane d. US 1/West Site Entrance Northbound one right -turn lane Westbound one right -turn lane ■ Southbound second left turn lane mn� Southbound one left -turn lane Coding: Words in ® type are deletions from existing law. Words underlined are additions. 2 RESOLUTION NO. 94-68 Indian River Boulevard/ 53rd Street signalization; and Northbound modify right -turn lane to one right-turn/through lane one throu h lane Eastbound one left -turn lane f. 53rd Street/Project Driveway Southbound one right -turn lane g_ In recognition that there rom Westbound MMM Westbound one riaht-turn lane r be lower levels o rth Street and Osl de a monitoring stud on this US 1 segmen Lssuance of the firs g with annual update e level of service i acnieve ievei or service .•ll,, on the above aescriDea segment of US 1 have been programmed for construction. All above configurations shall be permitted and constructed in accordance with City, County, and State criteria. No certificates of occupancy shall be iss"ed for any portion of the Harbor Town Center project until the intersection improvements under a, b, c, d., e, f, and g above have been completed, as certified by the Indian River County Public Works Director. The foregoing resolution was offered by Commissioner Macht and the motion was seconded by Commissioner Adams , and, upon being put to a vote, the vote was as follows: Chairman John W. Tippin Vice Chairman Ken Macht Commissioner Fran B. Adams Commissioner Richard N. Bird Commissioner Carolyn K. Eggert Coding: Words in ® type are deletions from existing law. Words underlined are additions. 3 RESOLUTION NO. 94- 68 This Chairman thereupon declared the resolution duly passed and adopted this 24 day of Mav , 1994. �rQ,. INDIAN RIVER COUNTY COMMISSIONERS INpi VER 591M'W, FLORIDA al ak `' C AN, John ippin T nj u ATTEST: �... .. Je y K. Ra on County Clerk by APPROVED AS TO PLANNING'MATTERS: Obert M. Keating AI APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGAL SUFFICIENCY: tCell- William G. Collins Deputy County Attorney u\c\s\htmdri.res Codings Words in ® type are deletions from existing law. Words underlined are additions. 4