Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
04/23/2019 (3)
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS INDIAN RIVER COUNTY FLORIDA COMMISSION AGENDA TUESDAY, APRIL 23, 2019 - 9:00 AM Commission Chambers Indian River County Administration Complex 1801 27th Street, Building A Vero Beach, Florida, 32960-3388 www.ircgov.com COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Bob Solari, Chairman, District 5 Susan Adams, Vice Chairman, District 1 Joseph E. Flescher, District 2 Peter D. O'Bryan, District 4 Tim Zorc, District 3 Jason E. Brown, County Administrator Dylan Reingold, County Attorney Jeffrey R. Smith, Clerk of the Circuit Court and Comptroller 1. CALL TO ORDER 2.A. A MOMENT OF SILENT REFLECTION FOR FIRST RESPONDERS 2.B. INVOCATION Stan Boling, Community Development Director 3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Commissioner Peter D. O'Bryan 4. ADDITIONS/DELETIONS TO THE AGENDA / EMERGENCY ITEMS 5. PROCLAMATIONS and PRESENTATIONS 5.A. Presentation of Proclamation Honoring Sharon Schalm on Her Retirement From Indian River County Board of County Commissioners Department of Community Development / Metropolitan Planning Organization with Thirteen Years of Service Attachments: Proclamation 5.B. Presentation of Proclamation Honoring Jeffrey Deforest Raynor on His Retirement From Indian River County Board of County Commissioners Department of Emergency Services/Fire Rescue with Thirty Years of Service Attachments: Proclamation April 23, 2019 Page 1 of 5 5.C. Quarterly Recycling Update - April 2019 Attachments: Staff Report 6. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 7. INFORMATION ITEMS FROM STAFF OR COMMISSIONERS NOT REQUIRING BOARD ACTION 7.A. Floodplain Management Annual Progress Report (NFIP CRS Activity 510) Attachments: Staff Report Floodplain Management Progress Report 8. CONSENT AGENDA 8.A. Checks and Electronic Payments April 5, 2019 to April 11, 2019 Attachments: Finance Department Staff Report 8.B. Sealed Bid Sale of 1215 82nd Avenue (Former Fire Station 7) Attachments: Staff Report 8.C. Work Order No. 10, Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc., Indian River Boulevard and 8th Street (IRC -1909) Attachments: Staff Report Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Work Order No. 10 8.D. Award of Bid No: 2019039, Indian River County Courthouse Renovations Project, IRC -1728 Attachments: Staff Report Sample Agreement 8.E. Work Order No. 11, Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc., Indian River Boulevard and 37th Street (IRC -1910) Attachments: Staff Report Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Work Order No. 11 Intersection Realignment Preliminary Design Exhibit 8.F. Miscellaneous Budget Amendment 010 Attachments: Staff Report 2018 2019 Resolution Exhibit "A" April 23, 2019 Page 2 of 5 8.G. Ronald and Susan Brooks' Request for Release of a Portion of an Easement at 437 N. Tangerine Square SW (Citrus Springs Village A) Attachments: Staff Report Maps of Easement Proposed Resolution Releasing Easement 8.H. FDOT Small County Outreach Program (SCOP) Agreement and Resolution Authorizing the Chairman's Signature for 49th Street/Lindsay Road From 58th Avenue to 31st Avenue and Construction Engineering Inspection (CEI) Services Project No. IRC -1414, FM No. 436850-1-54-01 Attachments: Staff Report Indian River County Grant Form Authorizing Resolution FDOT Small County Outreach Program (SCOP) Agreement FM No. 436850-1-54-01 8.I. Due Diligence and Project Review - West Regional WWTF Reclaimed Water Storage, Tetra Tech Amendment No. 1 to Work Order No. 2 Attachments: Staff Report Tetra Tech Limited Phase II ESA 9. CONSTITUTIONAL OFFICERS and GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES 10. PUBLIC ITEMS A. PUBLIC HEARINGS B. PUBLIC DISCUSSION ITEMS C. PUBLIC NOTICE ITEMS 11. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR MATTERS 12. DEPARTMENTAL MATTERS A. Community Development 12.A.1. Applications for BCC Appointees to the Metropolitan Planning Organization Citizens Advisory Committee Attachments: Staff Report Application of Mike Grim Application of Erica Ogilvie Application of Chris Murphy B. Emergency Services C. General Services 1. Human Services April 23, 2019 Page 3 of 5 2. Sandridge Golf Club 3. Recreation D. Human Resources E. Office of Management and Budget 12.E.1. Property/Casualty Insurance 2019-20 Attachments: Staff Report Executive Summary F. Public Works 12.F.1. Request for Waiver Bid Requirements for Paving Services from All Paving Attachments: Staff Report Quote from All Paving G. Utilities Services 12.G.1. John's Island Water Management Reclaimed Water Project - Permitting Status Attachments: Staff Report 12.G.2. Barrier Island Reclaimed Water Main System Analysis - Results Attachments: Staff Report Preliminary Engineering Report Plans for North County Reuse Water Main Study 13. COUNTY ATTORNEY MATTERS 13.A. Temporary Construction Easement For Hole -in -the -Wall Island and Pine Island for Reuse Line Attachments: Staff Report Example Temporary Construction Easement Letter from Indian River County Mosquito Control District, dated February 18, 2019 Letter from Brian Seymour, dated December 3, 2018, with attachments Letter from Paul Bangel, dated October 10, 2001, with attachment Letter from William Hyde, dated May 4, 1999, with attachment Letter from Ernest Cox, dated November 9, 2001 Atlantic Coastal Title Corporation Chain of Title Report dated April 7, 1999 Letter from Louis "Buck" Vocelle, Jr., dated April 16, 2019 Memo from William G. Collins II, dated May 7, 2001 14. COMMISSIONERS MATTERS April 23, 2019 Page 4 of 5 A. Commissioner Bob Solari, Chairman B. Commissioner Susan Adams, Vice Chairman C. Commissioner Joseph E. Flescher D. Commissioner Peter D. O'Bryan E. Commissioner Tim Zorc 15. SPECIAL DISTRICTS AND BOARDS A. Emergency Services District B. Solid Waste Disposal District C. Environmental Control Board 16. ADJOURNMENT Except for those matters specifically exempted under the State Statute and Local Ordinance, the Board shall provide an opportunity for public comment prior to the undertaking by the Board of any action on the agenda, including those matters on the Consent Agenda. Public comment shall also be heard on any proposition which the Board is to take action which was either not on the Board agenda or distributed to the public prior to the commencement of the meeting. Anyone who may wish to appeal any decision which may be made at this meeting will need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made which includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal will be based. Anyone who needs a special accommodation for this meeting may contact the County's Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Coordinator at (772) 226-1223 at least 48 hours in advance of meeting. Anyone who needs special accommodation with a hearing aid for this meeting may contact the Board of County Commission Office at 772-226-1490 at least 20 hours in advance of the meeting. The full agenda is available on line at the Indian River County Website at www.ircgov.com The full agenda is also available for review in the Board of County Commission Office, the Indian River County Main Library, and the North County Library. Commission Meetings are broadcast live on Comcast Cable Channel 27 Rebroadcasts continuously with the following proposed schedule: Tuesday at 6:00 p.m. until Wednesday at 6:00 a.m., Wednesday at 9:00 a.m. until 5:OOp.m., Thursday at 1:00 p.m. through Friday Morning, and Saturday at 12:00 Noon to 5:00 p.m. April 23, 2019 Page 5 of 5 EA rf PROCLAMATION HONORING SHARONSCHALM ON HER RETIREMENT FROM THE INDIAN RIVER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT/METROPOLITANPLANNING ORGANIZATION (MPO) WHEREAS, Sharon Schalm retires from the Indian River County Department of Community Development, MPO effective April 25, 2019; and WHEREAS, Sharon began her career with Indian River County on May 30, 2006, as MPO StaffAssistant III; and WHEREAS, Sharon's duties involved complex tasks and frequent coordination with the Public, local Elected Officials, the School District, Law Enforcement, FDOT, USDOT, and others; and WHEREAS, Sharon has been an integral part of the "MPO Team"; and WHEREAS, the MPO is the recipient of numerous distinctions and awards, including the national award for Outstanding Small MPO and the Designated Official Planning Agency of the Year for the State of Florida; and WHEREAS, Sharon has gained the respect and admiration of all of the MPO's many partner agencies and has executed her duties with professionalism, charisma, enthusiasm, and overall excellence, all of which contributed immeasurably to the success of the MPO. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT PROCLAIMED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that the Board applauds Sharon Schalm's efforts on behalf of the County, and the Board wishes to express their appreciation for the dedicated service she has given to Indian River County for the last thirteen years; and BE IT FURTHER PROCLAIMED that the Board of County Commissioners and staff extend heartfelt wishes for success in her future endeavors! Adopted this 23rd day of April, 2019. V BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS INDL4NRIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA c/c%_toto„t4_, OBob Solari, Chairman RIO�' 41 • s8 PROCLAMATION HONORING LIEUTENANT JEFFREY DEFOREST RAYNOR UPON THE OCCASION OF HIS RETIREMENT FROM INDIAN RIVER COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF EMERGENCY SERVICES WHEREAS, Jeff Raynor began his distinguished dedication to public service with Indian River County as a Firefighter/EMT on April 6, 1989; and, WHEREAS, through diligent work and demonstrated ability he advanced through the Fire Service ranks becoming a Driver/Engineer in 2006 and Fire Lieutenant in 2012 in which he has served his crews and the community with integrity, devotion and selflessness; and WHEREAS, Jeff Raynor's career is filled with all the hallmarks of a great man who humbly did important deeds for the citizens of Indian River County; he maintained the highest standards for himself in regards to his continuing education; he received commendations from superiors, community organizations and countless individuals who benefited from his expertise, sensitivity and efficiency as a first responder; and WHEREAS, Jeff Raynor was well-known to all as one who could be counted on in any situation be it fighting fires, saving lives, keeping his crews safe, training new hires or volunteering his free time to endeavors that enhanced our community; and, WHEREAS, Jeff Raynor, who retires on April 30, 2019, was honored as the 2018 Firefighter of the Year for culminating 30 years of exemplary service to the fire department, his co-workers, and the citizens of Indian River County. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT PROCLAIMED BY THE INDIAN RIVER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, that the Board is grateful to Jeff Raynor for being a true example of an employee who has served his community with integrity, loyalty, commitment, compassion and pride. BE IT FURTHER PROCLAIMED that the Board of County Commissioners and staff extend their sincerest wishes for success in all his future endeavors. Adopted this 23rd Day of April 2019 l'zoRit)N BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA Bob Solari, Chairman �c. � �i INDIAN RIVER COUNTY SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL DISTRICT BOARD MEMORANDUM sc Date: April 10, 2019 To: Jason E. Brown, County Administrator From: Vincent Burke, P.E., Director of Utility Services Thru: Himanshu H. Mehta, P.E., Managing Director, Solid Waste Disposal District (SWDD) Prepared By: Susan Flak, Recycling Education and Marketing Coordinator, SWDD Subject: Quarterly Recycling Update —April 2019 SECOND QUARTERLY UPDATE: For the second quarter of Fiscal Year (FY) 2018/19, the total quarterly recycling tonnages continue to be higher than the previous three years of single -stream recycling. Month FY 2015/16 Tonnages FY 2016/17 Tonnages FY 2017/18 Tonnages FY 2018/19 Tonnages January 1,613 2,030 2,177 2,379 February 1,585 1,606 1,714 1,599 March 1,941 1,900 1,793 1,788 Total Quarterly Tonnage 5,139 5,536 5,684 5,766 RECYCLING RATE UPDATE FOR 2018: On March 31, 2019, Solid Waste Disposal District (SWDD) staff submitted the annual Solid Waste Management Report to the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP). According to the data we submitted to FDEP for review, the recycling rate for Indian River County (IRC) is estimated to be 66% for 2018. Although this is higher than the FDEP-approved 2017 IRC Recycling Rate of 64%, it is short of the FDEP interim goal of the 70% recycling rate by December 31, 2018. The official recycling rates for all Florida counties should be posted by the FDEP by July 1, 2019. RECYCLING COLLECTION EVENTS: During the second quarter, SWDD partnered with Waste Management to host the winter Electronics and Household Hazardous Waste (HHW) Recycling Event on January 26, 2019, at the North County Pool. The event brought in 155 cars and recycled 4,122 lbs. of electronics as well as paint cans, propane tanks, pesticides, and other HHW. 3 - Page 1- CAMPAIGNS AND INITIATIVES: After a generous donation by the Wrap Recycling Action Program (W.R.A.P) sponsor, America's Plastic Makers, SWDD has successfully placed loose plastic film receptacles at each of our five Customer Convenience Centers (CCCs) and the main county landfill. We are experiencing good participation and have accumulated over 20 bags, or approximately 446 pounds, of loose plastic film from these locations in the first month alone. After a close audit, SWDD has concluded that we are experiencing a very low contamination rate as well. We are also working closely with Dan Compas from the Rotary Club of Vero Beach in hopes of getting more commercial businesses to recycle their loose plastic film. So far, the Marsh Landing Restaurant, the Walking Tree Brewery, and Coastal Van Lines are all using film receptacles donated by the Rotary Club of Vero Beach. These entities are bringing their full bags to one of the CCCs or to the main landfill. Overall, IRC SWDD is excited to report a very successful first quarter in the W.R.A.P. campaign. We are optimistic that this program will continue to grow, based on participation rates from both the residential and commercial sectors. - Page 2 - 4 Recycling Update for 2nd Quarter Solid Waste Disposal District Sue Flak Recycling Education and Marketing Coordinator April 23, 2019 Recycling Tonnages for the 2nd Quarter Month January February FY2015/16 Tonnages 1,613 1,585 FY2016/17 Tonnages 2,030 1,606 FY2017/18 Tonnages 2,177 1,714 March Total Quarterly Tonnage 1,941 1,900 1,793 FY2018/19 Tonnages 2,379 1,599 f 1,788 5,139 5,536 5,684 5,766 2018 Recycling Rate Update 50% 34% 60% 53% 60% 70% 64% 66% Let's work together to reach eyd. 1 VabCOCIDatICO should recycled. 2020. Pending FDEP Approval Congr 'ons to our rathe winner ary Ellen Kolbe! Updates... At the 5 CCC's Main County Landfill Commercial WRING TBREWERY COASTAL VAN LINES INC. Rotary Club of Vero Beach Vero's 1st Club -1926 Out in the Community More Landfill Tours! Pelican Island Wildlife Refuge Festival srany Solid Waste Disposal District sonr.toeryclas<an 770.3112 g,)RILL with US...RECYCLC TRASH TALK Main County Library --------------------- CCC Beautification INFORMATIONAL ITEM INDIAN RIVER COUNTY MEMORANDUM TO: Jason E. Brown County Administrator THROUGH: Stan Boling, AICP Community Development Director FROM: Roland M. DeBlois, AICP Chief, Environmental Planning DATE: April 12, 2019 RE: Floodplain Management Annual Progress Report (NFIP CRS Activity 510) It is requested that this item be placed on the agenda of the Board of County Commissioner's regular meeting of April 23, 2019 for informational purposes. DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS As part of Indian River County's participation in the Community Rating System (CRS) of the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP), the County is required to complete a floodplain management annual progress report (CRS Activity 510). Based on the results of the last NFIP audit, the County has maintained its Class 6 certification rating, resulting in a 20% discount to flood insurance premiums in the unincorporated county under the program. Attached is a copy of the annual progress report being submitted by staff to meet program requirements. The County Unified Local Mitigation Strategy (LMS) currently serves as the County's Floodplain Management Plan under the CRS program. The attached report references the LMS and County floodplain management activities as they pertain to the County's participation in the CRS program, and verifies County compliance with program requirements. RECOMMENDATION This item is presented for informational purposes only; no action of the Board is requested or required. ATTACHMENT 1. Floodplain Management Annual Progress Report. C:\Users\legistar\AppData\Local\Temp\BCL Technologies\easyPDF 8\@BCL@580E6A37\@BCL@580E6A37.docx 5 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 1801 27th Street, Vero Beach FL 32960 772-226-1237 / 772-978-1806 fax www.ircgov.com Indian River County Floodplain Management Annual Progress Report April 2019 The Indian River County Unified Local Mitigation Strategy (LMS) serves as the County's Floodplain Management Plan under the Community Rating System (CRS) of the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP). Under CRS Activity 510, the County is required to complete a Floodplain Management Plan annual progress report. This document is that report. Adoption of the LMS / Updates The Indian River County LMS was originally adopted in November 1999 (County Resolution 99- 125). In February 2005, the Board of County Commissioners adopted Resolution 2005-023, approving a 2005 Revised Unified LMS. On July 13, 2010, the Board approved a 2010 Revised Unified LMS (County Resolution 2010-059). In July 2015, the Board adopted a 2015 Revised LMS (County Resolution 2015-078). The 2015 LMS complies with the federal hazard mitigation planning standards contained in 44 CFR 201/6(b) -(d). The 2015 LMS will expire on August 12, 2020. A revised LMS is required to be submitted to the Florida Department of Emergency Management (FDEM) for formal review no later than six months prior to the August 2020 expiration date (i.e., by February 11, 2020). The 2015 Unified LMS can be viewed using the follow web link: http://www.ircgov.com/Boards/LMS/Final-2015-LMS.pdf Purpose and Objectives of the LMS The purpose of the LMS is to develop a unified approach among County and municipal governments for dealing with identified hazards and hazard management problems, including flooding, in the Indian River County area. The LMS serves as a tool to direct the County and municipal governments in their ongoing efforts to reduce the vulnerability to the impacts produced by both natural and man-made hazards. The LMS also helps establish funding priorities for currently proposed mitigation projects and develop priority mitigation projects to be completed with such disaster assistance funds as may be available after a disaster. The primary objectives of the LMS are to: • Improve the community's resistance to damage from known natural, technological and societal hazards; -1— M:\NFIP CRS\CRS 2019\IRC Floodplain Mgt Progress Report April 2019.doc 6 • Place Indian River County in a position to compete more effectively for pre- and post - disaster mitigation funding; • Reduce the cost of disasters at all levels; and • Speed community recovery when disasters occur. Local Mitigation Strategy Working Group A Local Mitigation Strategy Working Group has been established to review and make recommendations concerning the LMS. The Working Group consists of representatives of local municipalities, local organizations and County departments, and is coordinated by staff of the County Emergency Management Division. In 2019, the LMS Working Group will be meeting to make recommendations on an updated LMS, to be submitted to the FDEM no later than February 11, 2020 for formal review. LMS Project Prioritization List The LMS Working Group has established a general Project Prioritization List (PPL) of 37 projects eligible for Hazard Mitigation Grant Program (HMGP) grants and/or other potential funding sources (see Attachment 1). CRS Program Participation The LMS references the importance and benefit of Indian River County's participation in the Community Rating System (CRS) of the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP). Under the CRS, the County undertakes flood protection measures beyond the minimum requirements of the NFIP. By doing so, Indian River County has achieved a "Class 6" certification, resulting in a 20% discount of flood insurance premiums in the unincorporated county. The County achieves CRS points by undertaking various activities that promote flood protection. These activities are conducted by various county departments. Following is a summary of certain ongoing activities by various departments resulting in points under the CRS program: Activity Department(s) CRS Activity # Maintain elevation certificates, make copies of certificates available to the public Building Div. / Planning Div. 310 Provide Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) information, maintain updated FIRMs Planning Div. / Engineering Div. 320 Provide outreach to community / flood protection information Emergency Management 330 Provide credited hazard disclosure measures; information on recorded plats Planning Div. 340 Provide flood protection materials at public library County Library 350 Preserve floodplain in open space through zoning / CPLU / public acquisition Planning Div. 420 Review new development for County Engineering Div. / 430 -2— M:\NFIP CRS\CRS 2019\IRC Floodplain Mgt Progress Report April 2019.doc 7 compliance with flood protection regulations Building Div. / Planning Div. Track substantial improvements / permitting to meet current requirements Building Div. / Planning Div. / ' Engineering Div. 430 Maintain elevation reference marks County surveyor 440 Maintain FIRMs since County participation in NFIP Planning Div. 440 Maintain drainage systems through a regular program Road and Bridge Div. (also IRF Water Control District) 540 Enforce stream dumping regulations Code Enforcement / Public Works / Stormwater Div. 540 Conduct test of flood warning / emergency response program Emergency Management 610 Certified Floodplain Manager Program The Association of State Floodplain Managers (ASFPM) has established a national program for professional certification of floodplain managers. The program recognizes continuing education and professional development that enhance the knowledge and performance of local, state, federal, and private -sector floodplain managers. Staff in the Land Development Section of the County Engineering Division, as well as the County Building Official, have achieved and maintain the status of Certified Floodplain Manager (CFM), which reflects Indian River County's commitment to professional service in implementing the County's floodplain management plan. County Website Access to FEMA Digitized Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRMs) In Indian River County and elsewhere, Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRMs) identify the location of Special Flood Hazard Areas (SFHAs) which are based on 100 -year floodplains. These flood maps are used regularly by the public for flood insurance reasons and by county staff in regulating development in SFHAs. In 2012, FEMA completed a FIRM modernization project in Indian River County, resulting in the County formally adopting revised digital FIRMs effective December 4, 2012. Those revised, current FIRMS are now available for public access and viewing on Indian River County's website (www.ircgov.com ), on the following web pages: http://www.ircgov.com/flood/ https://ircgis.maps.arcgis.com/home/index.html IRC Levee Analysis and Mapping Procedure (LAMP) and Coastal Study Project FIRM Updates In September 2015, representatives from FEMA Region IV and its consultant, AECOM, met with local government officials in an initial "Stakeholder Engagement and Data Collection Meeting." The purpose of the meeting was for FEMA and AECOM to provide an overview to local stakeholders of the levee analysis and mapping process for non -accredited levees, particularly relating to the "Vero Lake Channel A" levee that was under review in conjunction with an appeal by the Sebastian River Improvement District (SRID). The SRID appeal occurred when Indian River County was undergoing its flood insurance rate map (FIRM) modernization in 2012. -3— M:\NFIP CRS\CRS 2019\IRC Floodplain Mgt Progress Report April 2019.doc 8 Since that time, FEMA and AECOM representatives have met with local officials on a number of occasions for discussion and review of draft working maps of revisions relating to Vero Lake Channel A and also relating to a Coastal Study Area update. On September 29, 2017, FEMA issued preliminary revised maps of the Levee Analysis and Coastal Study updates, which are available for public access and viewing through a link on the County's Flood Information web page: http://www.ircgov.com/flood/ . On March 21, 2018, FEMA, in coordination with the County and local municipalities, held an advertised open house at Sebastian River High School inviting the public to view and provide comments on the preliminary revised maps. The preliminary revised maps are currently on schedule to go into effect later this year in September/October 2019. Summary The LMS, which serves as the County's Floodplain Management Plan under the CRS of the NFIP, underwent a five-year update that was approved by the Board of County Commissioners on July 7, 2015. As a part of that update, an LMS Project Prioritization List (PPL) was revised and has since been updated. The 2015 LMS is set to expire in August 2020, and an updated LMS must be submitted to the FDEM for formal review no later than February 11, 2020. Indian River County has achieved and maintains a Class 6 certification under the CRS. Activities are undertaken by various county departments on an ongoing basis to retain the CRS certification, which results in substantial discounts to flood insurance premiums in the unincorporated county. In 2012, FEMA completed a FIRM modernization project in Indian River County, resulting in the County formally adopting revised digital FIRMs effective December 4, 2012. Those FIRMS are available for public access and viewing on Indian River County's website. More recently, representatives of FEMA and its consultant, AECOM, have met with local officials as part of a process to resolve a disputed flood mapping area affected by the Vero Lake Channel A levee, which has been deemed by FEMA to be non -accredited. Preliminary issuance of revised maps affected by the non -accredited Vero Lake Channel A levee, as well as Coastal Study Area revised maps, are on schedule to become effective in September/October 2019. Attachment: LMS Project Prioritization List. -4— M:\NFIP CRS\CRS 2019\IRC Floodplain Mgt Progress Report April 2019.doc 9 Project Priority Project Score Project Description Estimated Project Cost 8 Estimated Time of Completion 8 Est. Federal Share Applicant/ Responsible Party Mitigation to be Accomplished Hazards Mitigated Jurisdiction(s) Involved' Possible Funding Sources Date Confirmed/ Added 1 94 Replace and upgrade roof of the Vero Beach Police Department building. $450,000 12 months $337,500 City of Vero Beach Don Dexter The police department serves as the citys EOC and the existing roof is approximately 30 years old and does not meet current wind load standards. Hurricane/Tropical Storm City of Vero Beach HMGP, CDBG, Pre -disaster Mitigation Program Confirmed HMGP 1/16/19 (Don Dexter). 2 93 Retrofits to the countys public schools that serve as public shelters. $75,000 <12 months $56,250 Indian River County Emergency Management Tad Stone Reduces vulnerability to wind and flood damage and provides for critically needed shelter (primary critical facilities) and reducing the county's safe shelter space deficit. Hurricane and Tropical Storm All Jurisdictions Coastal Construction Building Zone Program; CDBG; DRI; HMGP; Hurricane Program; NFMF - Confirmed 1/5/19 (Tad Stone) 3 93 Fellsmere Culvert Replacement $630,000 6 months $47,250 City of Fellsmere Jason Nunemaker Replacement of all existing culverts along New York/97th Street with RCP at proper intervals to reduce head loss to Park Lateral. Hurricane and Tropical Storm Multiple CDBG, HMGP, DRI, USDA, EDA Confirmed 2/27/19 (Jason Nunemaker) 4 91 Blue Cypress Park access repair $100,000 48 months $75,000 Indian River County Parks Division Kevin Kirwin Provide access to the park, raise roadbed, replace failing culvert, flood mitigation. Tropical Storm/Hurricane, Flood All Jurisdictions HMGP, FWC/DEP, SJRWMD Confirmed 2/27/19 (Kevin Kirwin) 5 89 Open Water and wetland system - Fellsmere South Regional Lake $2,000,000 12 months $1,500,000 City of Fellsmere Jason Nunemaker Open water and wetland system to mitigate flooding and provide nutrient removal for incorporated and Flooding, pollution City of Fellsmere, Indian River County, Fellsmere Water Control District SJRWMD, LWCF, State Appropriation, CDBG-ED, HMGP Confirmed 2/27/19 (Jason Nunemaker) 6 86 Rebuild non -wind code compliant Fire Rescue Stations. $4 million 18 months $3,000,000 Indian River County Emergency Services Tad Stone This will allow these critical facilities to withstand major hurricane impact, and support the personnel on an extended basis with power water and sewer facilities. These projects will benefit all citizens and visitors of Indian River County as well as the surrounding counties we assist through mutual aid by providing uninterrupted Fire Rescue and EMS service during and after a mainr disaster event. Hurricane, Tropical Storm and Flood All Jurisdictions HMGP Confirmed 1/5/19 (Tad Stone) 10 Project Priority Project Score I Project Description Estimated Project Cost & Estimated Time of Completion & Est. Federal Share Applicant/ Responsible Party Mitigation to be Accomplished Hazards Mitigated Jurisdiction(s)Date Involved' Possible Funding Sources Confirmed/ Added 7 85 Conservation Area Prescribed Burn $255,000 12-36 months $191,250 Indian River County Community Development Roland DeBlois Purchase of equipment contract work to treat areas vulnerable to wildfire, especially conservation areas with added material from Hurricane Matthew through mechanical means and prescribed bums. Wildfire All jurisdictions HMGP Confirmed HMGP 1/17/19 (Roland DeBlois) 8 84 Historic Fellsmere Flood Study $50,000 12 months $37,500 City of Fellsmere Jason Nunemaker An accurate flood map will mitigate against future floods by ensuring homes will be properly alevatPrd Flood City of Fellsmere HMGP Confirmed 7/23/18 (Jason Nunemaker) 9 83 Generator project for Sebastian Adult Day Care Center. $100,000 <12 months $75,000 Senior Resource Association, Karen Deigl IRCES, Cory Richter Generator upgrade for the Sebastian Adult Day Care Center to increase the shelter capacity for a step-down shelter for Special Needs Shelter clients. Hurricane/Tropical Storm All Jurisdictions HMGP Confirmed 1/26/18 (Karen Deigl/Cory Richter) 10 83 Elkcam Canal dredging and seawalls $4 million >12 months $3,000,000 City of Sebastian Paul Carlisle Reduces the exposure of possible flooding and property damage to residential homes, businesses, and city owned facilities. Flooding and erosion City of Sebastian HMGP, FMA, SJRWMD, FPMS, USAGE, CDBG Confirmed 2/12/19 (Tim Walker) 11 81 Retrofits to the North County Library to reduce vulnerability to wind and flood damage. $10,000 <12 months Indian River County Public Works Rich Szpyrka Reduces vulnerability of a public building and contents (library) to flooding damage. Severe Weather: including Hurricane, Tropical Storm, Tornado, lightning on 4 Flnnrd All Jurisdictions Public Library Construction Grant; Coastal Construction Building Zone Program; CDBG; DRI; FMAP; HMGP; Hurricane Prnnrnm• KIFMAF Confirmed 3/1/19 (Rich Szpyrka) 12 81 Retrofits to the county's main library to reduce vulnerability to wind and flood damage. $10,000 <12 months Indian River County Public Works Rich Szpyrka Reduces vulnerability of a public building and contents (library) to flooding damage. Severe Weather: including Hurricane, Tropical Storm, Tornado, lightning anrd Flnnrd All Jurisdictions Public Library Construction Grant; Coastal Construction Building Zone Program; CDBG; DRI; FMAP; HMGP; Hurricane Prnnrnm• AIFMF Confirmed 3/1/19 Rich Szpyrka 13 80 Indian Lane drainage canal $933,400 >1 2 months Indian River Shores Joe Griffin Dredging the Indian Lane storm water drainage canal to improve holding capacity and provide better flow from the storm water drainage system Severe Weather: including Hurricane, Tropical Storm, Tornado, lightning and Flood Town of Indian River Shores Flood Plain Management Services, HMGP, FMA, State Preparedness Grant Confirmed 2/27/19 (Joe Griffin) 14 80 Barber Street bridge replacement $2.5 million >12 months $1,875,000 City of Sebastian Paul Carlisle Ensures traffic circulation, emergency response, and public transportation from the city to U.S. #1, C.R. 512, and I- OS Hurricane/tropical storm, erosion, and flooding City of Sebastian CDBG, HMGP, EDA Confirmed HMGP 2/27/19 (Scott Baker) 15 80 George Street canal dredging and seawalls $4 million >12 months $3,000,000 City of Sebastian Paul Carlisle Reduces the exposure of flooding and property damage to residential homes, businesses, and city owned facilities. Hurricane/tropical storm, flooding, and erosion City of Sebastian HMGP, FMA, SJRWMD, FPMS, USACE, CDBG Confirmed 2/12/19 (Tim Walker) 11 Project Priority Project Score Project Description Estimated Project Cost & Estimated Time of Completion & Est. Federal Share Applicant/ Responsible Party Mitigation to be Accomplished Hazards Mitigated - Jurisdiction(s) Involved' Possible Funding Sources Date Confirmed/ Added 16 79 Retrofits to the City of Vero Beach Public Works facility including roof replacement and hardening of building. $2 million >12 months $1,500,000 City of Vero Beach Don Dexter Reduces the vulnerability to category 4 or 5 hurricanes for two critical facilities. Severe Weather: including Hurricane, Tropical Storm, Tomado, lightning onrl t=lnnd City of Vero Beach HMGP, CDBG, EMP&A Trust Fund (DCA), Pre-disaster Mitigation Program (FEMA), Hurricane Program (FEMA) Confirmed 1/16/19 (Don Dexter) 17 79 Fleming Street bridge replacement $2 million >12 months $1,500,000 City of Sebastian Paul Carlisle Ensures traffic circulation, emergency response, and public transportation from the city to U.S. #1, C.R. 512, and l- og Hurricane/tropical storm, flooding, and erosion City of Sebastian CDBG, HMGP, EDA Confirmed 2/27/19 (Scott Baker) 18 79 Replacement of county bridges constructed below the 100-year flood plain for improved access, evacuation and eynncura to flnnrlinn $10 million >12 months $7,500,000 Indian River County Public Works Department Rich Szpyrka Reduces the risk of fatalities (loss of life) during evacuation. Flooding All Jurisdictions CDBG; DRI; Emergency Relief Program; FMAP; HMGP; Hurricane Program; NFMF; STP Confirmed 3/1/19 (Rich Szpyrka) 19 78 Install flood control structures Vero Isles. $60,000 12 months $45,000 City of Vero Beach Don Dexter Installation will help to minimize tidal flooding of the homes and businesses from the Indian River Lagoon to 8th Avenue in the Miracle Mile and Royal Palm Point sh000ina areas. Flooding, hurricane/tropical storm, tsunami City of Vero Beach HMGP, FDEP Confirmed HMGP 1/16/19 (Don Dexter) 20 78 Hibiscus Children's Center $575,000 <12 months $431,250 Hibiscus Children's Center/IRCEM Fortification of group home for 40 at-risk teenagers to allow shelter-in-place. Harden roofs and install generators. Tropical Storm/Hurricane, Flood Vero Beach HMGP Added 2/1/18 (Lisa Wynne) 21 75 Protection of the Surticial Aquifer groundwater quality and quantity as a secondary potable water source through acquisition of primary recharge areas and through the plugging of abandoned artesian wells. $2 million >12 months 51,500,000 Indian River County Community Development Roland DeBlois Reduces the exposure to potential wellfield contamination. Drought All Jurisdictions Capitalization Grants for Drinking Water State Revolving Fund; Conservation Technical Assistance; DRI; HMGP; Planning Assistance to States Program; Water Pollution Control: State and Interstate Program Support; Water Quality Confirmed 1/17/19 (Roland DeBlois) 22 77 Laconia Avenue extension $5 million >12 months 53,750,000 City of Sebastian Paul Carlisle This project will provide a major emergency evacuation route. that will include a new bridge over the St. Sebastian River. It will provide a much-needed major escape route not directly impacted by the Florida East Cnaat Railway. Flooding Sebastian CDBG, Emergency Relief, FMAP, HMGP Confirmed 2/27/19 (Scott Baker) 23 74 Culvert/Pipe for Stonecrop Main ditch alignment $500,000 <12 months $375,000 City of Sebastian Paul Carlisle Ensures circulation of storm water system and reduces possible flooding and property damage. Hurricane/tropical storms, flooding, erosion Sebastian HMGP, FMA, SJRWMD, FPMS Confirmed HMGP 2/12/19 (Tim Walker) 12 Project Priority IProject Score Project Description Estimated Project Cost & Estimated Time of Completion 8 Est. Federal Share Applicant/ Responsible Party Mitigation to be Accomplished Hazards Mitigated Jurisdiction(s) Involved* Possible Funding Sources Date Confirmed/ Added 24 74 Relocation of City of Vero Beach wastewater treatment plant. $25,000,000 36 months $18,750,000 City of Vero Beach Rob Bolton Relocate WWTP located next to the I.R. Lagoon to City owned property located near the WTP at the Vero Beach Airport. Hurricane/tropical storms, tsunami City of Vero Beach HMGP, FMA, EPA Confirmed 1/16/19 (Don Dexter) 25 72 Construction of seawall/revetment along Humiston Beach in the City of Vero Beach. $600,000 >12 months $450,000 City of Vero Beach Don Dexter Residents and business owners will benefit from continued and uninterrupted access to the beach facilities and associated oarkina Flood and erosion Vero Beach HMGP Confirmed HMGP 1/16/19 (Don Dexter) 26 71 Construction of tilting Weir gates across two canals that connect Rockridge subdivision with the lagoon. $6.5 million >12 months $4,875,000 Indian River County Public Works Rich Szpyrka Will prevent flooding in the subdivision during hurricane events. Flood Unincorporated Indian River County HMGP Confirmed 3/1/19 (Rich Szpyrka) 27 67 Study of sea level rise potential impacts to public facilities. $100,000 >12 months $75,000 Indian River County Community Development Roland DeBlois This project will provide information for long range planning of new public facilities and retrofit of existing facilities. Flooding Unincorporated Indian River County HMGP, PDM, EMPA Confirmed 1/17/19 (Roland DeBlois) 28 66 Acquisition of land along the Indian River Lagoon within the Coastal High Hazard Area to reduce potential future losses. Phase I - $2 million Phase II - $7 million >12 months Phase I - $1,500,000 Phase II - $5,250,000 Indian River County Community Development Roland DeBlois Will reduce county exposure by preventing development in a high hazard area. Hurricane, Tropical Storm, Flood and coastal erosion Indian River County and City of Vero Beach Coastal Wetlands Planning, Protection, and Restoration Act; CDBG; DRI; HMGP; NFMF; North American Wetlands Conservation Act Grant Program; Outdoor Recreation: Acquisition, Development, and Planning Confirmed 1/17/19 (Roland DeBlois) 29 64 Culvert replacement for ditch/street crossings $1 million >12 months $750,000 City of Sebastian Paul Carlisle Replace all ditch culverts that intersect streets to promote better drainage. Flood Sebastian CDBG, Emergency Relief, FMAP, HMGP Confirmed HMGP 2/12/19 (Tim Walker) 30 64 Establishment of a county GIS department to improve flood mapping for flood damage reduction. $1 million to $2 million >12 months $750,000 to $1,500,000 Indian River County Public Works Rich Szpyrka Reduces countywide flood exposure by allowing better management of flood zones. Flood All Jurisdictions Challenge 21: Floodplain; Conservation Technical Assistance; FMAP; HMGP; 1 arot Prntartinn• AIFMF Confirmed 3/1/19 (Rich Szpyrka) 31 64 Construction of seawall along Conn Beach in the City of Vero Beach. $1.7 million >12 months $1,275,000 City of Vero Beach Don Dexter This project will provide erosion control, prevent damage to Ocean Drive and the Boardwalk which sustained approximately $1 million in damages from Hurricanes Frances and Hurricane/Tropical Storm, flood and coastal erosion Vero Beach HMGP Confirmed 1/16/19 (Don Dexter) 13 Project Priority Project Score Project Description Estimated Project Cost & Estimated Time of Completion a Est. Federal Share Applicant/ Responsible Party to be Accomplished Hazards Hazards Mitigated Jurisdiction(s) Involved' Possible Funding Sources Date Confirmed/ Added 63 Modifications to the outfall structure at $5000 Indian River County Reduces vulnerability to flooding Flood Unincorporated CDBG; DRI; Emergency Confirmed Stonebridge Subdivision for flood >12 months Public Works at this site. Indian River County Rehabilitation of Flood Control 3/1/19 32 damage reduction. $3,750 Rich Szpyrka Works; FMAP; HMGP; (Rich Szpyrka) Hurricane Program; NFMF; P,,hlir Aeeinrn 33 61 Jones' Pier floodproofing/elevation $800,000 <12 months $600,000 Indian River County Community Development Elevating historic structures to above base flood elevation (BFE); storm shutters; drainage improvements Flooding, Hurricane/tropical storm All Jurisdictions HMGP, DHR Confirmed 1/17/19 (Roland DeBlois) 59 Restoration of critically eroded areas $18 million initial/ Indian River County Reduces storm surge and . Flood City of Vero Beach CDBG; Conservation Plant Confirmed along an 8.3-mile stretch of the $48 million long-term Public Works Department flooding vulnerability. Material Centers, Conservation 3/1/19 Atlantic shoreline in an effort to .>12 months Rich Szpyrka Technical Assistance; DRI; (Rich Szpyrka) 34 provide needed storm protection. $13,500,000/ FMAP; HMGP; Hurricane $36,000,000 Program; Land Protection, Planning Assistance to States 55 Historic Fellsmere Regional Lakes $2,000,000 12 months City of Fellsmere Jason Nunemaker Will mitigate against future floods by storing flood waters Flood City of Fellsmere HMGP Confirmed 7/23/18 35 $1,500,000 within large regional lakes thereby reducing the flood level in the basins served by the ein}nrinn InLne (Jason Nunemaker) 48 Historic Fellsmere Alleyway Grading $1,400,000 12 months City of Fellsmere Jason Nunemaker Will mitigate against future floods by storing flood waters in Flood City of Fellsmere HMGP Confirmed Added 36 $1,050,000 the alleyways thereby reducing the flood level in the basins served by the alleyway flood 7/23/18 (Jason Nunemaker) 48 Historic Fellsmere Stormwater Greenway $1,800,000 12 months City of Fellsmere Jason Nunemaker Will mitigate against future floods by storing flood waters in Flood City of Fellsmere HMGP Confirmed Added 37 $1,350,000 the stormwater greeway thereby reducing the flood level in the basins served by the stormwater 7/23/18 (Jason Nunemaker) 14 JEFFREY R. SMITH, CPA, CGFO, CGMA Clerk of Circuit Court & Comptroller Finance Department 1801 27th Street Vero Beach, FL 32960 TO: HONORABLE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS FROM: ELISSA NAGY, FINANCE DIRECTOR THRU: JEFFREY R. SMITH, COMPTROLLER DATE: April 11, 2019 SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF CHECKS AND ELECTRONIC PAYMENTS April 5, 2019 to April 11, 2019 In compliance with Chapter 136.06, Florida Statutes, all checks and electronic payments issued by the Board of County Commissioners are to be recorded in the Board minutes. Approval is requestedfor the attached lists of checks and electronic payments, issued by the Comptroller's office, for the time period of April 5,:2019 to April 11, 2019. 15 TRANS NBR 380140 380141 380142 380143 380144 380145 380146 380147 380148 380149 380150 380151 380152 380153 380154 380155 380156 380157 380158 380159 380160 38016] 380162 380163 380164 380165 380166 380167 380168 380169 380170 380171 380172. 380173 380174 380175 380176 380177 380178 380179 380180 380181 380182 380183 380184 380185 380186 380187 380188 380189 380190 DATE 04/11/2019 04/11/2019 04/11/2019 04/11/2019 04/11/2019 04/11/2019 04/11/2019 04/11/2019 04/11/2019 04/11/2019 04/11/2019 04/11/2019 04/11/2019 04/11/2019 04/11/2019 04/11/2019 04/11/2019 04/11/2019 04/11/2019 04/11/2019 04/11/2019 04/11/2019 04/11/2019 04/11/2019 04/11/2019 04/11/2019 04/11/2019 04/11/2019 04/11/2019 04/11/2019 04/11/2019 04/11/2019. 04/11/2019 04/11/2019 04/11/2019 04/11/2019 04/11/2019 04/11/2019 04/11/2019 04/11/2019 04/11/2019 04/11/2019 04/11/2019 04/11/2019 04/11/2019 04/11/2019 04/11/2019 04/11/2019 04/11/2019 04/11/2019 04/11/2019 CHECKS WRITTEN VENDOR PORT CONSOLIDATED INC COMMUNICATIONS INTERNATIONAL COMMUNICATIONS INTERNATIONAL TEN -8 FIRE EQUIPMENT INC RANGER CONSTRUCTION IND INC FISHER SCIENTIFIC COMPANY LLC VERO CHEMICAL DISTRIBUTORS INC CHISHOLM CORP OF VERO HENRY SCHEIN INC SAFETY PRODUCTS INC PARALEE COMPANY INC B G KENN INC GRAINGER KELLY TRACTOR CO SAFETY KLEEN SYSTEMS INC WALKER. DISPLAY INC MCMASTER CARR SUPPLY CO ALLIED ELECTRONICS INC BOUND TREE MEDICAL LLC PETES CONCRETE VERO INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY INC CITY ELECTRIC SUPPLY DELL MARKETING LP MYRON L COMPANY BLAKESLEE SERVICES INC BAKER & TAYLOR INC BARNEYS PUMP INC MIDWEST TAPE LLC NORTHERN SAFETY CO INC CENGAGE LEARNING .INC J.IMMYS AIR & REFRIGERATION INC SOFTWARE HARDWARE INTEGRATION SUNSHINE SAFETY COUNCIL INC COMMUNITYASPHALT CORP SUNSHINE REHABILATION CENTER OF IRC INC CLERK OF CIRCUIT COURT CLERK OF CIRCUIT COURT CLERK OF CIRCUIT COURT CITY OF VERO BEACH AMERICAN CANCER ASSOCIATION INDIAN RIVER ALL FAB INC UNITED PARCEL SERVICE INC FERGUSON ENTERPRISES INC FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND FLORIDA GOVERNMENT FINANCE APCO INTERNATIONAL, INC BLUE CROSS & BLUE SHIELD OF FLORIDA INC FLORIDA FISH & WILDLIFE TREASURE COAST HOMELESS SERVICES HENRY F.ISCHER & SONS INC PUBLIX SUPERMARKETS AMOUNT 940.66 24,108.20 890.94 304.75 869.75 101.39 211.47 7,459.80 1,109.92 787.54 6,738.20 246.21 6,611.91 9,240.09 350.29 1,305.70 533.84 241.14 202.25 450.00 214.38 926.78 1,059.79 317.95 65.00 1,883.37 54,795.00 151.94 263.16 460.25 340.70 328.00 1,105.00 836.94 60.00 453.44 4,304.92 1,177.90 2,932.39 800.00 1,065.00 64.34 13,660.65 15,448.23 18.00 200.00 54.90 7,281.06 5,392.00 740.00 131.64 1 TRANS NBR 380191 380192 380193 380194 380195 380196 380197 380198 380199 380200 380201 380202 380203 380204 380205 380206 380207 380208 380209 380210 380211 380212 380213 380214 380215 380216 380217 380218 380219 380220 380221 380222 380223 380224 380225 380226 380227 380228 380229 380230 380231 380232 380233 380234 380235 380236 380237 380238 380239 380240 380241 380242 380243 DATE 04/11/2019 04/11/2019 04/11/2019 04/11/2019 04/11/2019 04/11/2019 04/11/2019 04/11/2019 04/11/2019 04/11/2019 04/11/2019 04/11/2019 04/11/2019 04/11/2019 04/11/2019 04/11/2019 04/1112019 04/1112019 04/11/2019 04/11/2019 04/11/2019 04/11/2019 04/11/2019 04/11/2019 04/11/2019 04/11/2019 04/11/2019 04/11/2019 04/11/2019 04/11/2019 04/11/2019 04/11/2019 04/11/2019 04/11/2019 04/11/2019 04/11/2019 04/11/2019 04/11/2019 04/11/2019 04/11/2019 04/11/2019 04/11/2019 04/11/2019 04/11/2019 04/11/2019 04/11/2019 04/11/2019 04/11/2019 04/11/2019 04/11/2019 04/11/2019 04/11/2019 04/11/2019 VENDOR ROGER CLEVELAND GOLF INC FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP CITY OF SEBASTIAN TIMOTHY ROSE CONTRACTING INC CALLAWAY GOLF SALES COMPANY FLORIDA RECREATION & PARK ASSOC INC FLORIDA RECREATION & PARK ASSOC INC FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT TAYLOR MADE GOLF CO INC BRE-CLEARWATER.OWNER LLC CITY OF FELLSMERE KENNETH CAMPBELL SENIOR STRUNK FUNERAL HOMES & CREMATORY MEDICARE PART B FINANCIAL SERVICES JASON E BROWN TOCOMA RUBBER STAMP & MARKING SYSTEM FLORIDA DEPT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION SHERILEE D PARSELL KEVIN OSTHUS AARP INSURANCE UNITED HEALTH CARE INS COMPANY GREY HOUSE PUBLISHING INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF COUNTY VETERAN SERVICE OFFICERS NATIONAL ALLIANCE FOR YOUTH SPORTS INC TOWN OF INDIAN RIVER SHORES ALAN C KAUFFMANN CIGNA GEICO WYNDHAM PALACE RESORT G K ENVIRONMENTAL INC HEALTH FIRST INS CO FLORIDA DEPT OF FINANCIAL SERVICES FLORIDA OUTDOOR EQUIPMENT INC BLUE CROSS BLUE SHIELD HUMANA BRIDGESTON.E AMERICAS INC HOMETOWN NEWS GATOR'S SOD INC ECONOLITE CONTROL PRODUCTS INC POSITIVE PROMOTIONS JAMES PUBLISHING INC RUSSELL PAYNE INC SCOTT MCADAM CELICO PARTNERSHIP DOWN UNDER TANK TESTING OF FLORIDA INC ANIXTER INC CINTAS CORPORATION NO 2 ELECTRONIC ACCESS SPECIALIST THE CLEARING COMPANY LLC AMOUNT 470.34 26.16 62.56 100.38 27,595.31 197,417.23 927.49 50.00 50.00 81,569.89 462.78 1,258.54 195.00 344.88 60.00 425.00 253.98 702.00 77.48 1,250.00 627.00 225.00 92.39 731.32 432.50 300.00 120.00 160.00 31,336.82 480.00 291.70 430.00 338.00 875.00 240.75 11,860.36 13, 780.26 1,165.21 449.54 3,346.04 1,703.00 7,900.00 524.00 492.27 1,146.00 222.39 65.85 211.54 1,820.00 1,700.00 23.97 188.44 V49.60 17 TRANS NBR 380244 380245 380246 380247 380248 380249 380250 380251 380252 380253 380254 380255 380256 380257 380258 380259 380260 380261 380262 380263 380264 380265 380266 380267 380268 380269 380270 380271 380272 380273 380274 380275 380276 380277 380278 380279 380280 380281. 380282 380283 380284 380285 380286 380287 380288 380289 380290 380291 380292 380293 380294 380295 380296 DATE 04/11/2019 04/11/2019 04/11/2019 04/11/2019 04/11/2019 04/11/2019 04/11/2019 04/11/2019 04/11/2019 04/11/2019 04/11/2019 04/11/2019 04/11/2019 04/11/2019 04/11/2019 04/11/2019 04/11/2019 04/11/2019 04/11/2019 04/11/2019 04/11/2019 04/11/2019 04/11/2019 04/11/2019 04/11/2019 04/11/2019 04/11/2019 04/11/2019 04/11/2019 04/11/2019 04/11/2019 04/11/2019 04/11/2019 04/11/2019 04/11/2019 04/11/2019 04/11/2019 04/11/2019 04/11/2019 04/11/2019 04/11/2019 04/11/2019 04/11/2019 04/11/2019 04/11/2019 04/11/2019 04/11/2019 04/11/2019 04/11/2019 04/11/2019 04/11/2019 04/11/2019 04/11/2019 VENDOR FLORIDA RURALLEGAL SERVICES INC THE SHERWIN WILLIAMS CO SOUTHERN JANITOR SUPPLY INC JOHNS EASTERN COMPANY INC MBV ENGINEERING INC MILES, .ROGER & MARGARET MASTELLER & MOLER INC STAPLES CONTRACT & COMMERCIAL INC SAFETY HARBOR RESORT AND SPA SAFETY HARBOR RESORT AND SPA SAFETY HARBOR .RESORT AND SPA GLOVER OIL COMPANY INC GERELCOM INC ARDAMAN & ASSOCIATES .INC DAYSPRING ORCHID ISLAND PROPERTY MGMT II INC KELLY J TURNER JR D&S ENTERPRISES OF VERO BCH LLC PETER OBRYAN GIS JOBS CLEARINGHOUSE JOHNNY B SMITH KYMISHA HARRIS BRENDA WEBB CHARLES A WALKER FISHER & PHILLIPS LLP MC KEIGHAN, HARRIETTE R MAX OF INDIAN RIVER INC ANTHONY STEWART TREASURE COAST FOOD BANK INC LAW OFFICE OF RUSH LAWSON HLP, INC. NICOLACE MARKETING INC WINSUPPLY OF VERO BEACH WELLCARE HEALTH PLAN SANDY ARACENA FLORIDA MEDICAID HELPING ANIMALS LIVE -OVERCOME NALC GUETTLER BROTHERS CONSTRUCTION LLC CITY DIRECTORIES MURPHY & WALKER P L PICTOMETRY INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION OVERDRIVE INC ALLDATA LLC XYLEM WATER SOLUTION USA INC SOUTHEASTERN SECURITY CONSULTANTS INC ALAN JAY -CHEVROLET CADILLAC SEMS TECHNOLOGIES LLC SEMS TECHNOLOGIES LLC SEMS TECHNOLOGIES LLC MOORE MOTORS INC JOSHUA HARVEY GHIZ REPROGRAPHIC SOLUTIONS INC AMOUNT 4,606.85 205.00 4,744.42 53,045.00 967.50 49.82 27,550.00 742.60 452.00 452.00 452.00 39,259.69 6,062.71 1,573.50 250.00 4,550.00 60.00 102.00 391.76 25.00 290.00 65.00 200.00 180.00 2,2 12.00 148.23 120.00 300.00 68.63 629.81 640.00 3,548.75 18.40 164.45 60.00 268.10 30.00 359.10 135,163.38 313.00 8,042.00 115,311.00 2,452.57 1,500.00 1,776.35 555.00 24,395.00 3,150.00 6,750.00 9,000.00 388.08 9,215.04 24.30 3 TRANS NBR 380297 380298 380299 380300 380301 380302 380303 380304 380305 380306 380307 380308 380309 380310 380311 380312 380313 380314 380315 380316 380317 380318 380319 380320 380321 380322 380323 380324 380325 380326 380327 380328 380329 380330 380331 380332 380333 380334 380335 380336 380337 380338 380339 380340 380341 380342 380343 380344 380345 380346 380347 380348 380349 DATE 04/11/2019 04/11/2019 04/11/2019 04/11/2019 04/11/2019 04/11/2019 04/11/2019 04/11/2019 04/11/2019 04/11/2019 04/11/2019 04/11/2019 04/11/2019 04/11/2019 04/11/2019 04/11/201.9 04/11/2019 04/11/2019 04/11/2019 04/11/2019 04/11/2019 04/11/2019 04/11/2019 04/11/2019 04/11/2019 04/11/2019 04/11/2019 04/11/2019 04/11/2019 04/11/2019 04/11/2019 04/11/2019 04/11/2019 04/1112019 04/11/2019 04/11/2019 04/11/2019 04/11/2019 04/11/2019 04/11/2019 04/11/2019 04/11/2019 04/11/2019 04/11/2019 04/11/2019 04/11/2019 04/11/2019 04/11/2019 04/11/2019 04/11/2019 04/11/2019 04/11/2019 04/11/2019 VENDOR LOWES HOME CENTERS INC CARDINAL HEALTH 110 INC MUNICIPAL EMERGENCY SERVICES INC ALEX MIKLO BURNETT LIME CO INC ATLANTIC ROOFING II OF VERO BEACH INC W&G MAINTENANCE PENGUIN RANDOM HOUSE LLC CARMEN LEWIS PRS CHEMTRADE CHEMICALS CORPORTATION KATE P COTNER TRINOVA -FLORIDA INC THE LAW OFFICES OF BERNARD EGAN & COMPANY MASCHMEYER CONCRETE COMPANY OF FLORIDA CORNERSTONE FAMILY SERVICES OF WEST VIRGINIA HAWKINS INC PRESTIGE HEALTH CHOICE JAMES MAUNEY ANDERSEN ANDRE CONSULTING ENGINEERS INC MOLINA HEALTHCARE MEDICAID UN I FIRST CORPORATION CDA SOLUTIONS INC SUNSHINE HEALTH PLAN MEDICAID GOTTA GO GREEN ENTERPISES INC HYDROMAX USA LLC RACE TO SAFETY TRAINING LLC EGP DOCUMENT SOLUTIONS LLC NORTH AMERICAN OFFICE SOLUTIONS INC EZLINKS GOLF LLC PTE GOLF LLC UNDER THE SUN PRODUCTIONS COVERALL NORTH AMERICA INC DEBBIE CARSON PEOPLE READY INC SUZANNE BOYLL COLE AUTO SUPPLY INC BRADFORD PLACE HOA BETH NOLAN ALLAN D KELLERMAN THOMAS R PILIERO FLORIDA BULB & BALLAST INC ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING SOLUTION INC GOVDIRECT INC WALTER UNGERBUECHLER STUART RUBBER STAMP & SIGN CO INC CORE & MAIN LP WELLMED ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE ASSOCIATES JOHN BOYER WATSON REALTY GROUP LEXINGTON PLACE POA AMOUNT 1,174.55 1,171.08 381.90 220.00 3,165.40 68,503.95 18,980.00 38.55 395.50 681.71 2,460.19 412.23 11,051.24 1,502.00 23,954.65 795.00 425.00 978.75 80.46 6,000.00 6,437.50 190.00 1,451.58 21,032.74 528.37 55.20 49,773.00 175.00 4,670.00 25.00 300.00 243.97 500.00 2,015.00 100.00 8,039.56 19.00 20.85 150.00 81.00 7,500.00 50.00 951.85 8,040.68 95.06 80.01 470.54 13,680.19 149.97 3.381.00 223.49 758.00 150.00 4 TRANS NBR 380350 380351 380352 380353 380354 380355 380356 380357 380358 380359 380360 380361 380362 380363 380364 380365 380366 380367 380368 380369 380370 380371 380372 380373 380374 380375 380376 380377 380378 380379 380380 380381 380382 380383 380384 380385 380386 380387 380388 380389 380390 380391 380392 380393 380394 380395 380396 380397 380398 380399 380400 380401 380402 DATE 04/11/2019 04/11/2019 04/11/2019 04/11/2019 04/11/2019 04/11/2019 04/11/2019 04/11/2019 04/11/2019 04/11/2019 04/11/2019 04/11/2019 04/11/2019 04/11/2019 04/11/2019 04/11/2019 04/11/2019 04/11/2019 04/11/2019 04/11/2019 04/11/2019 04/11/2019 04/11/2019 04/11/2019 04/11/2019 04/11/2019 04/11/2019 04/11/2019 04/11/2019 04/11/2019 04/11/2019 04/11/2019 04/11/2019 04/11/2019 04/11/2019 04/11/2019 04/11/2019 04/11/2019 04/11/2019 04/11/2019 04/11/2019 04/11/2019 04/11/2019 04/11/2019 04/11/2019 04/11/2019 04/11/2019 04/11/2019 04/11/2019 04/.11/2019 04/11/2019 04/11/2019 04/11/2019 VENDOR CHANGE HEALTHCARE LLC STEPHEN STONE JOSEPH LORINO VIKING LANDSCAPING LLC AMERICAN JANITORIAL INC CONCORDANCE HEALTHCARE SOLUTIONS LLC RAMONA MURPHY AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES INC HYDRO CONDUIT LLC PIRATE PEST CONTROL LLC CALITEN LLC JOHN TORRES AMERIGAS PROPANE LP ALL AMERICAN TRAILER CONNECTION INC DAVID MIKE ILLINOIS TOOL WORKS JORDAN POWER EQUIPMENT CORP CK CONTRACTORS & DEVELOPMENT LLC JAMES ROMANEK LIBERTY TIRE RECYCLING LLC AMOUNT 34,092.19 180.00 340.00 7,500.00 3,050.74 781.70 37.00 1,771.91 130,434.80 9.00 33.28 37.50 2,415.98 3,135.00 360.00 69,751.50 4,971.26 154,885 27 180.00 1,628.77 AQUATECH DEWATERING & PUMPING TECHNOLOGIE 862.12 DIOGO LIRA MJ-IAMMED HAMD1 PROCON EXCELLENCE LLC TONY WEEMS JUDITH A BURLEY JIMMY EMERSON CAROL BARKWELL CAREY FRAHM AUDREY A MILLER ANN CARLSON COMMERICAL RISK MANAGEMENT LUDMILA HEILE NORMA R BEAVER ROBERT BONUS QUINTIN K CLARK KRISTIN BARTELSON SUSAN BAYE BRANDEE ANTHONY DESIGN & PHOTOGRAPHY LLC PHILIP KATROVITZ OKSANA MOSENTSEVA SAMBA GARY R WARD CHARLES L WILLIS I RVING A TROOB 1VAN M FORD SOMMERS CONSTRUCTION LLC UTIL REFUNDS UTIL REFUNDS UTIL REFUNDS UTIL REFUNDS UTIL REFUNDS UTIL REFUNDS 120.00 96.00 500.00 88.63 20.00 182.45 25.00 100.00 5.32 8.84 431.20 14.40 49.63 473.21 318.72 25.00 25.00 65.00 494.80 16.32 199.24 100.00 514.40 6.04 216.49 45.00 29.72 46.67 37.57 98.60 50.00 17.59 5 'TRANS NBR DATE VENDOR AMOUNT 380403 04/11/2019 UTIL REFUNDS 100.00 380404 04/11/2019 UT.IL.REFUNDS 85.71 380405 04/11/2019 UTIL REFUNDS 258.30 380406 04/11/2019 UTIL REFUNDS 38.90 380407 04/11/2019 UTIL REFUNDS 69.47 .380408 04/11/2019 UTIL .REFUNDS 139.03 380409 04/11/2019 UTIL REFUNDS 15.37 380410 04/11/2019 UTIL REFUNDS 14.62 380411 04/11/2019 UTIL REFUNDS 78.06 380412 04/11/2019 UTIL :REFUNDS 55.48 380413 04/11/2019 UTIL REFUNDS 33.65 380414 04/11/2019 UTIL REFUNDS 105.16 380415 04/11/2019 UTIL REFUNDS 330.45 380416 04/11/2019 UTIL REFUNDS 88.41 380417 04/11/2019 UTIL REFUNDS 51.69 380418 04/11/2019 UTIL REFUNDS 90.20 380419 04/11/2019 UTIL REFUNDS 66.25 380420 04/11/2019 UTIL REFUNDS 33.44 380421 04/11/2019 UTIL REFUNDS 283.72 380422 04/11/2019 UTIL REFUNDS 29.78 380423 04/11/2019 UTIL REFUNDS 28.85 380424 04/11/2019 UTIL REFUNDS 40.42 380425 04/11/2019 UTIL REFUNDS 72.93 380426 04/11/2019 UTIL REFUNDS 27.32 380427 04/11/2019 UTIL REFUNDS 20.06 380428 04/11/2019 UTIL 'REFUN'DS 18.1.0 380429 04/11/2019 UTIL REFUNDS 41.34 380430 04/11/2019 UTIL REFUNDS 22.86 380431 04/11/2019 UTIL REFUNDS 52.97 380432 04/11/2019 UTIL REFUNDS 69.93 380433 04/11/2019 UT.ILREFUNDS 1.56 380434 04/11/2019 UTIL REFUNDS 55.31 380435 04/11/2019 UTIL REFUNDS 80.88 380436 04/11/2019 UT.IL REFUNDS 42.98 380437 04/11/2019 UTIL REFUNDS 254.21, 380438 04/11/2019 UTIL REFUNDS 47.55 380439 04/11/2019 UTIL REFUNDS 58.84 380440 04/11/2019 UTIL REFUNDS 70.74 380441 04/11/2019 UTIL REFUNDS .16:74 380442 04/11/2019 UTIL REFUNDS 45.59 380443 04/11/2019 UTIL REFUNDS 1,223.29 Grand Total: 1,749,794.43 6 TRANS NBR 6691 6692 6693 6694 6695 6696 6697 6698 6699 6700 6701 6702 6703 6704 6705 6706 6707 6708 Grand Total: ELECTRONIC PAYMENTS - WIRE & ACH DATE 04/05/2019 04/05/2019 04/05/2019 04/05/2019 04/05/2019 04/05/2019 04/05/2019 04/08/2019 04/08/2019 04/08/2019 04/10/2019 04/10/2019 04/11/2019 04/11/2019 04/11/2019 04/11/2019 04/11/2019 04/11/20.19 VENDOR AMOUNT CLERK OF CIRCUIT COURT 5.24 NATIONWIDE SOLUTIONS RETIREMENT INC 5,238.44 IRC FIRE FIGHTERS ASSOC 9.548.56 NATIONWIDE SOLUTIONS RETIREMENT INC 51.461.57 TOTAL ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES, CORP 12,049.22 CULTURAL COUNCIL OF IRC 3,508.20 FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND 11,396.21 IRS -PAYROLL TAXES 427,108.76 FL SDU 5,721.69 THALLE CONSTRUCTION CO INC 1,125,415.99 RX BENEFITS INC 2,283.51 1 R C HEALTH INSURANCE - TRUST 82.531.63 CHARD SNYDER & ASSOCIATES INC 184.00 BLUE CROSS & BLUE SHIELD OF :FLORIDA ,INC 11,550.00 HIGHMARK STOP LOSS 7,338.87 MUTUAL OF OMAHA 2.551.50 IRS -PAYROLL TAXES 15,885.75 ATLANTIC COASTAL LAND TITLE CO LLC 19,152.50 1,792,931.64 1 TRANS. NBR 1014813 1014814 1014815 1014816 1014817 1014818 1014819 1014820 1014821 1014822 1014823 1014824 1014825 1014826 1014827 1014828 1014829 1014830 1014831 1014832 1014833 1014834 1014835 1014836 1014837 1014838 1014839 1014840 1014841 1014842 1014843 1014844 1014845 1014846 1014847 1014848 Grand Total: ELECTRONIC PAYMENT - VISA CARD DATE 04/05/2019 04/05/2019 04/05/2019 04/05/2019 04/05/2019 04/05/2019 04/05/2019 04/05/2019 04/05/2019 04/05/2019 04/05/2019 04/05/2019 04/05/2019 04/09/2019 04/09/2019 04/09/2019 04/10/2019 04/10/2019 04/10/2019 04/10/2019 04/10/2019 04/10/2019 04/10/2019 04/10/2019 04/10/2019 04/10/2019 04/10/2019 04/10/2019 04/10/2019 04/10/2019 04/11/2019 04/11/2019 04/11/2019 04/11/2019 04/11/2019 04/11/2019 VENDOR PARKS RENTAL & SALES INC ROBINSON EQUIPMENT COMPANY INC RING POWER CORPORATION MIKES GARAGE & WRECKER SERVICE INC MEEKS PLUMBING INC SOUTHERN COMPUTER WAREHOUSE INC TOTAL TRUCK PARTS INC SHRIEVE CHEMICAL CO MIDWEST MOTOR SUPPLY CO RECHTIEN INTERNATIONAL TRUCKS METRO FIRE PROTECTION SERVICES INC STAT MEDICAL DISPOSAL INC PACE ANYALYTICAL LLC AT&T WASTE MANAGEMENT INC COMCAST AT&T OFFICE DEPOT BSD CUSTOMER SVC COLD AIR DISTRIBUTORS WAREHOUSE INDIAN RIVER BATTERY DAV ES SPORTING GOODS & TROPHIES APPLE INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY CO GALLS LLC ALLIED UNIVERSAL CORP GROVE WELDERS INC CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DISTRIBUTORS INC HYDRA SERVICE (S) INC COUNTY MATERIALS CORPORATION GUARDIAN ALARM OF FLORIDA LLC EFE INC PRIDE ENTERPRISES L&L DISTRIBUTORS STAT MEDICAL DISPOSAL INC ALLIED DIVERSIFIED OF VERO BEACH LLC NEXAIR LLC PACE ANYALYTICAL LLC AMOUNT 451.75 3,331.31 2.869.11 270.00 527.00 476.29 353.26 4,060.00 390.71 2,078.30 2,492.65 640.00 108.00 18,968.91 1,676.19 539.43 79.47 1,337.57 103.76 507.25 32.40 3.96 993.70 5,007.39 2,601.25 98.32 2,949.87 9.854.40 2,761.50 1,813.12 4.292.34 618.59 265.00 3.200.00 907.38 108.00 76,768.18 1 CONSENT INDIAN RIVER COUNTY OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET PURCHASING DIVISION DATE: April 15, 2019 TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS THROUGH: Jason E. Brown, County Administrator Kristin Daniels, Director, Office of Management and Budget FROM: Jennifer Hyde, Purchasing Manager SUBJECT: Sealed Bid Sale of 1215 82nd Avenue (Former Fire Station 7) BACKGROUND: On February 5, 2019, the Board awarded bid 2019029 in the amount of $28,370 to Barth Construction for the demolition of the Former Fire Station 7 building, located at 1215 82nd Avenue. In response to external inquiries to staff from parties interested in purchasing the structure and parcel, the Board subsequently authorized the sealed bid sale of the facility on March 26, 2019. The demolition was put on hold, but that award was not terminated. ANALYSIS: In accordance with F.S. 125.35, advertisements announcing the sealed bid sale of the facility appeared in the Indian River Press Journal on March 29 and April 5, 2019. Four sealed bids in response to Invitation to Bid 2019053 were received and publicly opened on April 9, 2019 at 2:00 P.M. Bids were accepted in the amounts of $101,000, $40,158, $40,000 and $35,000. During review of the bids, the Public Works Department identified portions of the parcel that need be extracted from the property to facilitate future right-of-way needs, significantly reducing the size of the parcel to be sold. A right-of-way purchase at a later date is anticipated to exceed the revenue received under a sealed bid sale of the property. There is no provision within Florida Statute or County ordinance to enable a negotiation with the high bidder in a sealed bid sale. Staff anticipates the reduced size of the parcel will eliminate interest by the public to purchase, and the remainder of the parcel to be beneficial in the design of any future roadway projects. SOURCE OF FUNDS: Funding for the demolition of the building in the amount of $28,370 will be made available in the Emergency Services District- Other Contractual Services Account (11412022-033490). RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners reject all bids received in response to 2019053 Sealed Bid Sale of Real Property, and authorize the demolition of the building to proceed in accordance with Bid 2019029. 24 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA MEMORANDUM Sc CONSENT TO: Jason E. Brown, County Administrator THROUGH: Richard B. Szpyrka, P.E., Public Works Director FROM: James W. Ennis, P.E., Asst. Public Works Director SUBJECT: Work Order No. 10, Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Indian River Boulevard and 8th Street (IRC -1909) DATE: April 9, 2019 DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS Indian River County Public Works -Traffic Engineering performed a signal warrant engineering analysis on the intersection of Indian River Boulevard and 8th Street. Based upon the engineering analysis staff determined that a traffic signal was warranted for installation at this intersection. On April 17, 2018, the Board of County Commissioners approved the Continuing Consulting Engineering Service Agreement for Professional Services with Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. The purpose of Work Order No. 10 is to provide survey, design and permitting services to add traffic signal mast arm assemblies, pedestrian crosswalks, pavement markings, sidewalks with ADA compliant ramps and associated drainage improvements at the intersection of Indian River Boulevard and 8th Street. Work Order No. 10 is for a total lump sum amount of $67,200.00. FUNDING Funding is budgeted and available Optional Sales Tax/Account No. 31521441-066510-19010/8th Street & IR Blvd Intersection Improvements in the amount of $67,200.00. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of Work Order No. 10 to Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc., authorizing the professional services as outlined in the Scope of Services and requests the Board authorize the Chairman to execute Work Order No. 10 on their behalf for a lump sum amount of $67,200.00. ATTACHMENTS Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Work Order No. 10 AGENDA ITEM FOR APRIL 23, 2019 25 C:\Users\leg istar\AppData\Local\Temp\BCL Technologies\easyPDF 8\@BCL@580EF37C\@BCL@580EF37C. doc WORK ORDER NUMBER 10 8TH STREET AND INDIAN RIVER BLVD SIGNALIZATION — MAST ARMS Project Number: IRC -1909 This Work Order Number 10 is entered into as of this _ day of 2019, pursuant to that certain Continuing Consulting Engineering Services Agreement for Professional Services entered into as of this 17th day of April, 2018 (collectively referred to as the "Agreement"), by and between INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Florida ("COUNTY") and KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. ("Consultant"). The COUNTY has selected the Consultant to perform the professional services set forth on Exhibit A (Scope of Work), attached to this Work Order and made part hereof by this reference. The professional services will be performed by the Consultant for the fee schedule set forth in Exhibit B (Fee Schedule), attached to this Work Order and made a part hereof by this reference. The Consultant will perform the professional services within the timeframe more particularly set forth in Exhibit C (Time Schedule), attached to this Work Order and made a part hereof by this reference all in accordance with the terms and provisions set forth in the Agreement. Pursuant to paragraph 1.4 of the Agreement, nothing contained in any Work Order shall conflict with the terms of the Agreement and the terms of the Agreement shall be deemed to be incorporated in each individual Work Order as if fully set forth herein. EXHIBIT A — SCOPE OF WORK 8th Street & Indian River Blvd Signalization - Mast Arm Assembly The COUNTY desires to improve the intersection by installation of a mast arm traffic signal, pedestrian crosswalks and curb ramps, including sidewalk ramps and landings, associated signage and miscellaneous pavement markings as needed. In addition to the proposed signalization improvements, the County desires to complete the sidewalk facilities connecting the existing sidewalks that are located north and south of the subject intersection along the west side of Indian River Boulevard. It is understood that the COUNTY will provide the geotechnical investigation findings necessary to support the foundation design calculations. A. Topographic Design Survey: The Consultant shall provide topographic design survey services necessary to support and facilitate contemplated design and permitting activities associated with this project. This task will consist of the preparation of digital base map topographic surveys in accordance with the Florida Minimum Technical Standards set forth by the Florida Board of Professional Surveyors in Chapter 61G17-6, Florida Administrative Code, pursuant to Section 472.027, 11Page 26 Work Order No. 10 8th Street & Indian River Blvd - Mast Arm Florida Statutes. B. Signalization Plans: The COUNTY desires to prepare traffic signalization plans associated with the 8th Street and Indian River Boulevard intersection. It is understood that the proposed signalization improvements will consist of a mast arm traffic signal assembly at the subject intersection which will be designed to meet current IRC and FDOT standards. The plans will include the design and layout of proposed signal poles, signal heads, video detection, conduit, and pull boxes. The plans will include all call outs, controller timing chart, signal head details, sign details, controller notes, signal operating plan, overhead street name sign design details, pole schedules, tabulation of quantities. The set of plans will include the following sheets: key sheet; tabulation of quantities; general notes; plan sheet; sign work sheets (if necessary) and mast arm assemblies' data tables. The set of plans shall consist of the following: Notes: (P) -Preliminary, (S) -Substantially Complete, (F) -Final The final design plans will be prepared in accordance with the Indian River County and Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) standards to provide all elements necessary to accommodate the scope of work. This effort will include at a minimum; Key Sheet, General Notes Sheet, Plan Sheets, Cross Section Sheets, Erosion Control Sheets, Page 2 of 7 27 40% 80% 100% Cover Sheet P S F General Notes/ Legend P S F Tabulation of Quantities/ General P S F Roadway Plan Sheets P S F Signing & Pavement Marking Plans P S F Signalization and Pay Item Notes P 5 F Signalization Plans P S F Fiber Optic Plan P S F Standard Mast Arm Tabulation P S F Standard Mast Arm Assemblies Data Table P S F Sign Details P S F Construction Cost Estimate and Quantities P S F Notes: (P) -Preliminary, (S) -Substantially Complete, (F) -Final The final design plans will be prepared in accordance with the Indian River County and Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) standards to provide all elements necessary to accommodate the scope of work. This effort will include at a minimum; Key Sheet, General Notes Sheet, Plan Sheets, Cross Section Sheets, Erosion Control Sheets, Page 2 of 7 27 Work Order No. 10 8th Street & Indian River Blvd - Mast Arm Signalization Sheets, Opinion of Probable Construction Cost and other detail sheets as ,necessary to produce the construction bid plans. The following additional data shall be utilized for development of the plans: 1. The roadway plans sheets will be drawn at a scale of 1" = 40' prepared on 11" x 17" sheets. 2. Plan sheets shall depict existing right-of-way, section lines, property lines, temporary construction easements, and centerline of construction. Horizontal control points with state plane coordinates for all PC's, PT's, curve radius, curve length and horizontal PI's shall be included on the Plan or summarized in an alignment table. 3. Signing and Pavement Markings will be included within the Construction Documents. All signing and pavement markings are to be prepared in accordance with the latest design standards and practices (MUTCD), FDOT Standard Specifications, Indexes, and COUNTY standards. 4. Plans shall include spot grades adequate to describe any proposed grading. 5. Match lines shall not be located within the limits of an intersection. 6. If applicable, soil boring information shall be plotted on cross sections with soil classification and high season water table. 7. All quantities shall reference FDOT Pay Item Numbers. 8. All details shall reference FDOT Index Numbers, where applicable. 9. All specifications shall reference the FDOT Specifications for Road and Bridge Construction. Any deviations or special specifications not included in FDOT Specifications will be provided in the Technical Specifications. 10. Initial (40% completion), interim (80% completion) and Final Plan (100% completion) Submittal shall include the following: i. Three (3) Sets Plans. ii. One (1) Opinion of Probable Construction Cost iii. One (1) CD with drawings in PDF format. Page 3 of 7 28 Work Order No. 10 8th Street & Indian River Blvd - Mast Arm The Consultant will be responsible for producing an opinion of probable cost (OPC) estimate and reviewing and updating the OPC when scope changes occur and/or at designated milestones of the project. A Summary of Pay Items sheet shall be prepared with all required Initial (40%), Interim (80%) and Final Plan (100%) submittals. The Final Plans will be provided signed and sealed. The plans will be prepared based upon English units. The design will be conducted in MicroStation and Geopak. The Final Plans will be provided in Autodesk Civil 3D format. C. Signing and Pavement Marking Plans: Signing and Pavement Marking plans shall include: Preparation of the plan layout, key map, quantities (including signing and pavement marking quantity), tabulation of ,quantities, and detail of major signs. Plans are to be prepared in accordance with the latest design standards and practices (MUTCD), FDOT Standard Specifications, Indexes, and shall be accurate, legible, complete in design and drawn at the same scale as the Roadway Plans, furnished in reproducible form. D. Franchise Utility Coordination: The Consultant will coordinate with franchise utility operators in the vicinity of the project such that the proposed construction activities can be developed to minimize impacts to existing utilities located within the project limits. Franchise utility adjustments, designed by the respective franchise utility, will be requested by the Consultant and reflected within the prepared construction documents. The Consultant will coordinate with the electrical service provider relative to the location and infrastructure required to accommodate the proposed power supply location. E. Jurisdictional Permits: The Consultant will submit a request to St. Johns River Water Management District (SJRWMD) for verification of an Environmental Resource Permit (ERP) exemption as the proposed improvements are consistent with 62-330.051, F.A.C. Page 4 of 7 29 Work Order No. 10 8th Street & Indian River Blvd - Mast Arm EXHIBIT B — FEE SCHEDULE The COUNTY agrees to pay and the Consultant agrees to accept for services rendered pursuant to this Agreement fees inclusive of expenses in accordance with the following: A. Professional Services Fee The basic compensation mutually agreed upon by the Consultant and the COUNTY is as follows: Lump Sum Components Task Labor Fee Topographic Design Survey $ 5,200 Signalization Plans $ 34,400 Signing and Marking Plans $ 16,300 Franchise Utility Coordination $ 8,200 Jurisdictional Permits $ 3,100 Project Total $ 67,200 (THE REMAINDER OF THIS PAGE IS INTENTIONALLY BLANK) Page 5 of 7 30 Work Order No. 10 8th Street & Indian River Blvd - Mast Arm EXHIBIT C — TIME SCHEDULE Upon authorization to proceed by the COUNTY, final design documents are expected to take approximately seven (7) months from the Notice to Proceed (NTP). NTP contingent upon BOCC approval Initial Submittal (40% Design Drawings) Interim Submittal (80% Design Drawings) Final Submittal (100% Design Drawings) 3 months following NTP 5 months following NTP 7 months following NTP (THE REMAINDER OF THIS PAGE IS INTENTIONALLY BLANK) Page 6 of 7 31 Work Order No. 10 8th Street & Indian River Blvd - Mast Arm IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Work Order as of the date first written above. CONSULTANT: KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. By: an God, P.E. Title: Pr ccip al By: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY Bob Solari, Chairman BCC Approved Date: Attest: Jeffrey R. Smith, Clerk of Court and Comptroller By: Approved: Approved as to form and legal sufficiency: Deputy Clerk Jason E. Brown, County Administrator Dylan T. Reingold, County Attorney Page 7 of 7 32 Project Name Task Summary •'•T97:r{/N✓!.656.Z`.Y.3705M.7if •:!:s •::..v:r:r.:Y:vi.�fS -....._._ Summary 8th Street and Indian River Boulevard Signalization Manhours for project Task Principal Senior Registered Professional Designer Support Remarks Professional Professional 1 Staff $225 $200 $145 $110 $130 $60 Design Analysis 0 22 14 22 2 2 Utility Coordination 4 10 8 24 6 12 Signing and Marking Plans 4 7 24 15 18 0 Signalization Plans 8 44 80 20 80 0 Total Hours = 16 83 126 81 106 14 Labor Fee = $3,600 $16,600 $18,270 $8,910 $13,780 $840 Sub -Total Fee = $62,000 Design Topo Fee = $5,200 Project Total Fee = $67,200 8th Street and Indian River Blvd Workplan.xls Page 1 • W Design Analysis Activity: Design Analysis / Review ,....:'tr:;':',1.6.92 f19,70f` Bahr: 9.;2Z f ,:q2 fJ:?."JJ. X.X.'0! IZ r .r ; : r• s, %; f .,T... . . Task Principal Senior Registered Professional Designer Support Remarks Professional Professional 1 Staff Contract File 2 - 2 Cost Estimate 6 6 Cost est. conducted at 40%, 80% and 100% Coordination IR County 16 Three review submittals to County Field Review 8 8 Site Visits Computation Book & Quantities 4 8 QC/QA Project Management 4 Subtotal 0 22 14 4 22 2 Page 2 Utilities Activity: Utility Plans .�__.....,......,w....r...�.. sr. s:i: tr:�. _r....'. .......�w,,.._r'L;::.........:.�.`.�:.'.a...........rw�.-.. ..... ..._.s .....::GJ}s' r_:.. ...,. Task Principal Senior Registered Professional Designer Support Remarks Professional Professional 1 Staff Ex: Utility Reveiw 8 24 B Coordination w/ Util Co.'s - Request es -built data Electrical Service Provider Coordination Meeting 6 6 4 QC/QA 4 Project Management 4 Subtotal 4 10 8 24 6 12 Page 3 Activity: Signing and Marking Plans Task Principal Senior Registered Professional Designer Support Remarks Professional Professional 1 Staff Signing and Marking Plans Bth Street & Indian River Blvd 3 24 15 18 2 sheets @ 30 hrs/ sht Includes sidewalk connectivity improvements QC/QA 4 Project Management 4 Subtotal 4 7 24 15 18 0 Activity: Signalization Design Task Principal Senior Registered Professional Designer Support Remarks Professional Professional 1 Staff 8th Street & Indian River Blvd Mast -Arm Signalization Design 20 80 80 Foundation Structural Design 20 20 QC/QA 8 Project Management 4 Subtotal 8 44 80 20 80 0 Bp CONSENT INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA MEMORANDUM TO: Jason E. Brown, County Administrator THROUGH: Richard B. Szpyrka, P.E., Public Works Director FROM: Andy P. Sobczak, Infrastructure Project Manager SUBJECT: Award of Bid No: 2019039 Indian River County Courthouse Renovations Project IRC -1728 DATE: April 9, 2019 DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS On December 1, 2015 the Board of County Commissioners approved an Architectural and Engineering Services Agreement for building renovations at the Indian River County Courthouse in the amount of $213,634.00 with the Architectural Design Firm Pierce, Goodwin, Alexander, Linville (PGAL). The renovations include the construction of a new courtroom on the second floor of the courthouse and the conversion of the first floor Law Library into new office space. Following PGAL's completion of design, the project was advertised and a bid opening was held on March 1, 2019. Two (2) qualified bids were received for the project, a detailed tabulation of the bids is on file and available for viewing in the County Engineering Division. The two successful bidders and their respective bids are as follows: 1. W&J Construction Corp. $1,750,416.00 2. Barth Construction, Inc. $2,618,335.00 W&J Construction Corp. is considered to be the lowest, responsive, responsible bidder for the project with a bid totaling $1,750,416.00. This bid is $264,584.00 below the engineer's cost estimate of $2,015,000.00. Upon checking references, County Staff, has determined that W&J Construction Corp, Inc. has successfully completed similar construction projects. FUNDING Funding for the Indian River County Courthouse Renovations Project in the amount of $1,750,416.00 is available in Court Facility Surcharge/Facilities Mgmt./New Courtroom Facilities, Acct #14022019-066510-12009 in the amount of $87,451.00 and in Optional Sales Tax/Facilities Mgmt/Construction Acct #31522019-066510-12009 in the amount of $1,662,965. 38 Page 2 Award of Bid No: 2019039 Indian River County Courthouse Renovations Project April 23, 2019 BCC Meeting RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the project be awarded to W&J Construction Corp. in the amount of $1,750,416.00. Staff further recommends the Board approve the sample agreement and authorize the Chairman to execute said agreement after review and approval of both the agreement and required Public Construction Bond by the County Attorney as to form and legal sufficiency, and the receipt and approval of required insurance by the Risk Manager. ATTACHMENTS Sample Agreement APPROVED AGENDA ITEM FOR APRIL 23, 2019 F:\Public Works\ENGINEERING DIVISION PROJECTS\1728 IRC Courthouse Renovations Project \1-Admin\Agenda Items \Award of Bid\IRC-1728_AOB_20190409.doc 39 SECTION 00520 - Agreement (Public Works) TABLE OF CONTENTS Title Page ARTICLE 1- WORK 2 ARTICLE 2 - THE PROJECT ARTICLE 3 - ENGINEER ARTICLE 4 - CONTRACT TIMES ARTICLE 5 - CONTRACT PRICE ARTICLE 6 - PAYMENT PROCEDURES ARTICLE 7 - INDEMNIFICATION ) ) \\\\ ARTICLE 8 - CONTRACTORS REPRES`ATIONS: 5 ARTICLE 9 - CONTI ACT DOCUMENT\S, 6 � ARTICLE -1'0 MISCELLANEOUS 7 \\/‹. /\/./ 2 2 3 3 5 FTHE REMAINDER OF THIS PAGE WAS LEFT BLANK INTENTIONALLY] @BCL@F80D3400,0 00520 - 1 C:\Users\Iegistar\AppData\Local\Temp\BCL Technologies\easyPDF 8\@BCL@F80D3400\@8CL@F80D3400.doc SECTION 00520 - Agreement (Public Works) THIS AGREEMENT is by and between INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, a Political Subdivision of the State of Florida organized and existing under the Laws of the State of Florida, (hereinafter called OWNER) and (hereinafter called CONTRACTOR). OWNER and CONTRACTOR, in consideration of the mutual covenants hereinafter set forth, agree as follows: ARTICLE 1 - WORK 1.01 CONTRACTOR shall complete all Work as specified or indicated/in the Contract Documents. The Work is generally described as follows:> This project includes renovation work to the first and second floor of the existing Indian River County Courthouse. The fist -floor Law Library ,area will be renovated to house Probate/Juvenile offices that are'curr-ently located on the second floor. The second -floor area where obate%Juvenile\officesiare'located will be renovated into a new courtroom. The work includes demolition" of existing walls, ceilings, casework and finishes. The new\work to include walls, ceilings, casework, millwork, modular and courtroom (furniture, finishes, lighting, av/telecom, mechanical, plumbing, electrical and security. ARTICLE 2 - THE PROJECT 2.01 The Project for whic the Work -u ` r the Contact Documents may be the whole or only a part is generally described as follows Project Name:; NDIAN RIVER\COUNTY-COURTHOUSE RENOVATIONS PROJECT County Project Number IRC -1728 Bid Number: 2019039/ Pr c dress:,20 O,16TH AVENUE, VERO BEACH, FLORIDA 32960 ARTICLE 3 — ENGINEER 3.01 \Th d an River ounty Public Works Department is hereinafter called the ENGINEER and will act as OWNER's representative, assume all duties and responsibilities, and have the rights and authority assigned to ENGINEER in the Contract Documents in connection with the -,completion of the Work in accordance with the Contract Documents. ARTICLE 4 - CONTRACT TIMES 4.01 Time of the Essence A. All time limits for Milestones, if any, Substantial Completion, and completion and readiness for final payment as stated in the Contract Documents are of the essence of the Contract. B. The construction sequence for the first and second floor improvements shall be completed in the following order: @BCL@F80D3400.1 00520 - 2 C:\Users\Iegistar\AppData\Local\Temp\BCL Technologies\easyPDF 8\@BCL@F80133400\@BCL@F80133400.doc 1) Construction on the first -floor Law Library area must be completed first. Completion shall be measured by the issuance of an Indian River County Building Division Certificate of Occupancy (CO), and the move -in ready condition of the project area. 2) Construction on the second -floor project area may not begin until a CO is issued for the first floor area, and the occupants of the second floor have fully vacated and moved to the new first -floor area. 4.02 Days to Achieve Substantial Completion, Final Completion and Final Payment A. The Work will be substantially completed on or before the 27Oth,calendar day after the date when the Contract Times commence to run as provided/in paragraph 2.03 of the General Conditions, and completed and ready for final<payment !in/accordance with paragraph 14.07 of the General Conditions on or before ther30Ot alendar day after the date when the Contract Times commence to run. 4.03 Liquidated Damages A. CONTRACTOR and OWNER recognize that t me,is of the essence of,this Agreemel t and that OWNER will suffer financial lossiif th"e Work isnot completed within the times specified in paragraph 4.02 above, plus any extensions thereof,allowd in accordance with Article 12 of the General Conditions'Liquidated damages will commence for this portion of work. The parties also recognize'the delays;,expense, and difficulties involved in proving in a legal proceeding the actual loss suffered by/OWNER if the Work is not completed on time. Accordingly, instead of requi\ngw any�such proof, OWNER and CONTRACTOR agree that as liquidated damages for�delay (but not as a penalty), CONTRACTOR shall pay OWNER $1,665:OO'fo� each realenda?\day that expires after the time specified in paragraph 4.02 for Subst ,ntial-Completion untilthe Work is substantially complete. After Substantial Completion if CONTRACTOR shall neglect, refuse, or fail to complete the remaining Work within the\C tract Time or any proper extension thereof granted by OWNER, CONTRACTOR shall pay OWNER $1,665.00 for each calendar day that expires after the time,specified'in,paaragraph>4.02 for completion and readiness for final payment until the Work is completed and,ready for final payment. V \/`� ARTICLEONTRACT PRICE 5.01 OWNER ssl a I 'pay jCONTRACTOR for completion of the Work in accordance with the Corstract-Documentyn amount in current funds equal to the sum of the amounts dete mined pur udnt to paragraph 5.01.A and summarized in paragraph 5.01.B, below: A. For all Work, at -the prices stated in CONTRACTOR's Bid, attached hereto as an exhibit. B. THE CONTRACT SUM subject to additions and deductions provided in the Contract:: Numerical Amount: $ Written Amount: ARTICLE 6 - PAYMENT PROCEDURES 6.01 Submittal and Processing, of Payments @BCL@F80D340042 00520 - 3 C:\Users\IegistaMppData\Local\Temp\BCL Technologies\easyPDF 8\@BCL@F8003400\@BCL@F801)3400.doc A. CONTRACTOR shall submit Applications for Payment in accordance with Article 14 of the General Conditions. Applications for Payment will be processed by ENGINEER as provided in the General Conditions and the Contract Documents. 6.02 Progress Payments. A. The OWNER shall make progress payments to the CONTRACTOR on the basis of the approved partial payment request as recommended by ENGINEER in accordance with the provisions of the Local Government Prompt Payment Act, Florida Statutes section 218.70 et. seq. The OWNER shall retain ten percent (10%) of the payment amounts due to the CONTRACTOR until fifty percent (50%) completion of the work. After fifty percent (50%)completion of the work is attained as certified to OWNER by ENGINEER infw'riting, OWNER shall retain five percent (5%) of the payment amount due 4? :CONTRACTOR until final completion and acceptance of all work to be performedlby CONTRACTOR under the Contract Documents. Pursuant to Florida Statutes section'218.735(8)(b), fifty percent (50%) completion means the point at which the County as OWNER has expended fifty percent (50%) of the total cost of the constructionJseniices work purchased under the Contract Documents together with all costs associatil with existing change orders and othejadditions"off modifications.to the construction services work provided under the Contract Documents. } 6.03 Pay Requests. A. Each request for a progress payment shall be submitted on the application for payment form supplied by'OWNER and,the application for payment shall contain the CONTRACTOR'S certification. All`prbgress payments will be on the basis of progress of the -Work measured\by the schedule of values established, or in the case of unit`\price work based oh the number of units completed. After fifty percent (50%)\completion,\ end pursuant to Florida Statutes section 218.735(8)(d), the`CONTRACTOR may submit a pay request to the County as OWNER for` to one half (1/2)'of the retainage held by the County as OWNER, and the'County-as OWN.ER\shall promptly make payment to the CONTRACTOR unless such amounts -are -the subject of a good faith dispute; the subject of a claim pursuant to Florida/Statutes section 255.05; or otherwise the subject of a --claim or\demand by the County as OWNER or the CONTRACTOR. The CONTRACTOR acknowledges that where such retainage is attributable to the labor, services or materials supplied by one or more subcontractors or suppliers, Contractor shall timely remit payment of such retainage to those --subcontractors and suppliers. Pursuant to Florida Statutes section 218.735(8)(c), CONTRACTOR further acknowledges and agrees that: 1) the County as (OWNER' shall receive immediate written notice of all decisions made by CONTRACTOR to withhold retainage on any subcontractor at greater than five percent (5%) after fifty percent (50%) completion; and 2) CONTRACTOR will not seek release from the County as OWNER of the withheld retainage until the final pay request. 6.04 Paragraphs 6.02 and 6.03 do not apply to construction services work purchased by the County as OWNER which are paid for, in whole or in part, with federal funds and are subject to federal grantor laws and regulations or requirements that are contrary to any provision of the Local Government Prompt Payment Act. In such event, payment and retainage provisions shall be governed by the applicable grant requirements and guidelines. 4,21 00520 - 4 C:\Users\legista r\Ap p Data\Local\Temp\BCL Technologies \easyPD F 8\@BCL@ F80 D3400\@BC L@ F80D3400.doc 6.05 Acceptance of Final Payment as Release. A. The acceptance by the CONTRACTOR of final payment shall be and shall operate as a release to the OWNER from all claims and all liability to the CONTRACTOR other than claims in stated amounts as may be specifically excepted by the CONTRACTOR for all things done or furnished in connection with the work under this Contract and for every act and neglect of the OWNER and others relating to or arising out of the work. Any payment, however, final or otherwise, shall not release the CONTRACTOR or its sureties from any obligations under the Contract Documents or the Public Construction Bond. ARTICLE 7 - INDEMNIFICATION 7.01 CONTRACTOR shall indemnify OWNER, ENGINEER, arid !others in accordance with paragraph 6.20 (Indemnification) of the General Conditions t\thecoonstruction Contract. ARTICLE 8 - CONTRACTOR'S REPRESENTATIONS \ v r 8.01 In order to induce OWNER to enter into this Agreement CONTRACTOR 1 following representations: A. CONTRACTOR has examined andjcarefully studied the .Contract Documents and the other related data identified in the Bidding Document's. B. CONTRACTOR has visited thee\Sit wand become familiar with and is satisfied as to the general, local, and Site conditions that may affect cost, progress, and performance of the Work.\, C. CONTRACTOR is farniliaysith--and is,,sa\tissfied'as to all federal, state, and local Laws and Regulations that may affecost, pr`` ; and performance of the Work. D. CONTRACT,\OR has carefully` studied all: (1) reports of explorations and tests of subsurface conditions at -or contiguous to the Site and all drawings of physical conditions in or relating oto\existirigsurface\or subsurface structures at or contiguous to the Site (except Underground ,Facilities, which have been identified in the Supplementary ,/Conditions as provided in paragraph 4.02 of the General Conditions and (2) reports and drawings of a Hazardous Environmental Condition, if any, at the Site which have been identifed'in t eh ; pp entary Conditions as provided in paragraph 4.06 of the General Conditions. E. CONTRACTOR has obtained and carefully studied (or assumes responsibility for having done so) ail dditional or supplementary examinations, investigations, explorations, tests, studies, and data concerning conditions (surface, subsurface, and Underground Facilities) at or contiguous to the Site which may affect cost, progress, or performance of the Work or which relate to any aspect of the means, methods, techniques, sequences, and procedures of construction to be employed by CONTRACTOR, including applying the specific means, methods, techniques, sequences, and procedures of construction, if any, expressly required by the Contract Documents to be employed by CONTRACTOR, and safety precautions and programs incident thereto F. CONTRACTOR does not consider that any further examinations, investigations, explorations, tests, studies, or data are necessary for the performance of the Work at the Contract Price, within the Contract Times, and in accordance with the other terms and conditions of the Contract Documents. @BCL@F80D340044 00520 - 5 C:\Users\legistar\AppData\Local\Temp\BCL Technologies\easyPDF 8\@BCL@F80D3400\@BCL@F80D3400.doc G. CONTRACTOR is aware of the general nature of work to be performed by OWNER and others at the Site that relates to the Work as indicated in the Contract Documents. H. CONTRACTOR has correlated the information known to CONTRACTOR, information and observations obtained from visits to the Site, reports and drawings identified in the Contract Documents, and all additional examinations, investigations, explorations, tests, studies, and data with the Contract Documents. I. CONTRACTOR has given ENGINEER written notice of all conflicts, errors, ambiguities, or discrepancies that CONTRACTOR has discovered in the Contract Documents, and the written resolution thereof by ENGINEER is acceptable to CONTRACTOR. J. The Contract Documents are generally sufficient to indicate- and convey understanding of all terms and conditions for performance and furnishing of the.Work. ARTICLE 9 - CONTRACT DOCUMENTS 9.01 Contents A. The Contract Documents consist of the foilo niw g 1. This Agreement (pages 00520-1 to 00520-9,incl a sive); 2. Notice to Proceed (page 0‘51-1,); \\\ \\ 3. Public Construction Bond (pages,00610-1 to;00610-3, inclusive); 4. Sample Certificate oft -lability Insu c \(age 00620-1); 5. Contractors Applicationfor\Pa�nt (pages 00622-1 to 00622-6 inclusive); J 6. Certificate of Substantia` rnpletio n (pages 00630-1 to 00630-2, inclusive); 7. Contractor's Final Certification of the Work (pages 00632-1 to 00632-2, inclusive); 8. Professional Surveyor & Mapper's Certification as to Elevations and Locations of the Work (p ge,.00634; 1); �_f V 9: ---General Conditions (pages 00700-1 to 00700-44, inclusive); 10. Supplementary Conditions (pages 00800-i to 00800-11, inclusive); 11. Specifications as listed in Division 1 (General Requirements) and IRC -1728 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY COURTHOUSE RENOVATIONS PROJECT (Project Specifications); 12. Drawings consisting of a cover sheet and sheets numbered A0.10 through E4.01, inclusive, with each sheet bearing the following general title: INDIAN RIVER COUNTY COURTHOUSE RENOVATIONS; 13. Addenda (if applicable ); 14. Appendices to this Agreement (enumerated as follows): 15. CONTRACTOR'S BID (pages 00310-1 to 00310-6, inclusive); @BCL@F80D340045 00520 - 6 C:\Users\I egista r\AppData\Loca I\Temp\BCL Technologies \ea syPDF 8\@BCL@ F80 D3400\@BCL@ F80 D3400.doc 16. Bid Bond (page 00430-1), Qualifications Questionnaire (pages 00456-1 to 00456-4, inclusive), List of Subcontractors (page 00458-1); 17.Sworn Statement Under Section 105.08, Indian River County Code, on Disclosure of Relationships (pages 00452-1 to 00452-2, inclusive); 18.Certification Regarding Prohibition Against Contracting with Scrutinized Companies (page 00460-1); 19.The following which may be delivered or issued on or after the Effective Date of the Agreement and are not attached hereto: a) Written Amendments; b) Work Change Directives; c) Change Order(s); ARTICLE 10 - MISCELLANEOUS 10.01 Terms A. Terms used in this Agreement will have t eh meanings indicated in the General Conditions. 10.02 Assignment of Contract A. No assignment by a<party`ereto ofan�y`ighs under or interests in the Contract will be binding on another parity beereto�withyout the written consent of the party sought to be bound; and, specifically but�with:outlimitation, moneys that may become due and moneys that are duet ay not be'`as\signed.without such consent (except to the extent that the effect of this `strict n may\I:ie\!imited/by law), and unless specifically stated to the contrary in any written consent to an assignment, no assignment will release or discharge the assignor fr'orn anduty or res nsibility under the Contract Documents. 10.03 Successors ors and Assigns / A� OWNER and CONTRACTOR each binds itself, its partners, successors, assigns, and \i'egal representati TS\tothe other party hereto, its partners, successors, assigns, and legal representatives)in;respect to all covenants, agreements, and obligations contained in the Contract Documents. 10.04 Severability- A. everability A. Any provision or part of the Contract Documents held to be void or unenforceable under any Law or Regulation shall be deemed stricken, and all remaining provisions shall continue to be valid and binding upon OWNER and CONTRACTOR, who agree that the Contract Documents shall be reformed to replace such stricken provision or part thereof with a valid and enforceable provision that comes as close as possible to expressing the intention of the stricken provision. 10.05 Venue @BCL@F80D340046 00520 - 7 C:\Users\legistar\AppData\Local\Temp\BCL Technologies\easyPDF 8\@BCL@F80D3400\@BCL@F80D3400.doc A. This Contract shall be governed by the laws of the State of Florida. Venue for any lawsuit brought by either party against the other party or otherwise arising out of this Contract shall be in Indian River County, Florida, or, in the event of a federal jurisdiction, in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida. 10.06 Public Records Compliance A. Indian River County is a public agency subject to Chapter 119, Florida Statutes. The Contractor shall comply with Florida's Public Records Law. Specifically, the Contractor shall: (1) Keep and maintain public records required by the County to pesrform the service. (2) Upon request from the County's Custodian of Public Records provide County with a copy of the requested records or allow the records to be inspected or copied within a reasonable time at a cost that does not exceed the cost provided in.Chapter 119>or as otherwise provided by law. (3) Ensure that public records that are exempt or confidential and exempt frompublic o�s records disclosure requirements are not discld\exceppu t\ s authorized"by law for the duration of the contract term and following'ompletion of the contract4if the contractor does not transfer the records to the County. (4) Upon completion of the contract, transfer., at4no,cost, to the County all public records in possession of the Contractor or keep and maintain public records required by the County to perform the service. If the Contradtortransfers�all public records to the County upon completion of the contract, the Contractor shall destroy any duplicate public records that are exempt or confidential hand -,exempt lfrom'pubIic records disclosure requirements. If the contractor keeps and maintains,public`reords upon completion of the contract, the Contractor shall meet all appl ci a b.le'requrements for retaining public records. All records stored electronically must be provided.t` the County, upon request from the Custodian of Public Records; in`forrmat that compatible with the information technology systems of the County. \\ B. ,-IF-THE CONTRACTOR HAS QUESTIONS REGARDING THE APPLICATION OF CHAPTER 119, FLORIDA STATUTES, TO THE CONTRACTOR'S\DUTY TO PROVIDE PUBLIC RECORDS RELATING TO,,,THIS-CONTRACT, CONTACT THE CUSTODIAN OF PUBLIC RECORDS AT. (772)-2261424 publicrecordseircgov.com Indian River County Office of the County Attorney 1801 27th Street Vero Beach, FL 32960 C. Failure of the Contractor to comply with these requirements shall be a material breach of this Agreement. @BCL@F80D3400407 00520 - 8 C:\UsersU egi sta Mpp Data\Local\Temp\BCL Technologies\easyPDF 8\@BCL@ F80 D3400\@BC L@ F80 D3400. doc IN WITNESS WHEREOF, OWNER and CONTRACTOR have signed this Agreement in duplicate. One counterpart each has been delivered to OWNER and CONTRACTOR. All portions of the Contract Documents have been signed or identified by OWNER and CONTRACTOR or on their behalf. This Agreement will be effective on , 20 (the date the Contract is approved by the Indian River County Board of County Commissioners, which is the Effective Date of the Agreement). OWNER: INDIAN RIVER COUNTY CONTRACTOR: By: By: Bob Solari, Chairman By: Jason E. Brown, County Administrator APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGAL SUFFICIENCY: By: Dylan Reingold, County Attorney Jeffrey R. Smith, Clerk of Court and Comptroller Attest: (SEAL) D°ep 1y -Clerk Designated-Representati Vie: Named Richard B. Szpyrka., P.E. Title: cP f blic Work Ds ri ecto? 1801 27th Street—~, Vero Beach; -Florida 32960 (772) 226-1234 1 Facsimile: (772)/178-9391 Attest (C irit`ractor) (CORPORATE, SEAL) \Address for giving notices: v License No. (Where applicable) Agent for service of process: Designated Representative: Name: Title: Address: Phone: Facsimile: (If CONTRACTOR is a corporation or a partnership, attach evidence of authority to sign.) * * END OF SECTION * * @BCL@F80D340048 00520 - 9 C:\Users Vegistar\AppData\Local\Temp\BCL Technologies\easyPDF 8\@BCL@F8003400\@BCL@F80D3400.doc INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA MEMORANDUM TO: Jason E. Brown, County Administrator THROUGH: Richard B. Szpyrka, P.E., Public Works Director FROM: James W. Ennis, P.E., Asst. Public Works Director SUBJECT: Work Order No. 11, Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Indian River Boulevard and 37th Street (IRC -1910) DATE: April 9, 2019 DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS Indian River County Public Works has reviewed the traffic volumes and Level of Service (LOS) for the intersection of Indian River Boulevard and 37th Street. Based upon the review, staff determined that the intersection is currently operating at a LOS of 'F' (failing). In addition to this, a review of the crash history at the intersection indicated that an intersection realignment could result in a reduction in the frequency and severity of accidents at this location. In order to improve the intersection's LOS and reduce the frequency of accidents, re -aligning the intersection into the traditional perpendicular configuration ("T" intersection) and facilitating safety improvements was necessary. On April 17, 2018, the Board of County Commissioners approved the Continuing Consulting Engineering Service Agreement for Professional Services with Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. The purpose of Work Order No. 11 is to provide geotechnical, design, and permitting services to re -align the 37th Street Roadway, add additional eastbound and northbound turn lanes, replace the signal mast arm assemblies, provide pedestrian crosswalks, pavement markings & signage, sidewalks with ADA compliant ramps and associated drainage improvements at the intersection of Indian River Boulevard and 37th Street. Work Order No. 11 is for a total lump sum amount of $194,680.00. FUNDING Funding is budgeted and available in Optional Sales Tax/Account No. 31521441-066510-19011/37th Street & IR Blvd Intersection in the amount of $194,680.00. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of Work Order No. 11 to Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc., authorizing the professional services as outlined in the Scope of Services and requests the Board authorize the Chairman to execute Work Order No. 11 on their behalf for a lump sum amount of $194,680.00. ATTACHMENTS Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Work Order No. 11 Intersection Realignment Preliminary Design Exhibit AGENDA ITEM FOR APRIL 23, 2019 C:\Users\legistar\AppData\Local\Temp\BCL Technologies\easyPDF 8\@BCL@680EAA50\@BCL@680EAA50. doc 49 WORK ORDER NUMBER 11 37T" STREET & INDIAN RIVER BOULEVARD INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS Project Number: IRC -1910 This Work Order Number 11 is entered into as of this _ day of , 2019, pursuant to that certain Continuing Consulting Engineering Services Agreement for Professional Services entered into as of this 17th day of April, 2018 (collectively referred to as the "Agreement"), by and between INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Florida ("COUNTY") and KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. ("Consultant"). The COUNTY has selected the Consultant to perform the professional services set forth on Exhibit A (Scope of Work), attached to this Work Order and made part hereof by this reference. The professional services will be performed by the Consultant for the fee schedule set forth in Exhibit B (Fee Schedule), attached to this Work Order and made a part hereof by this reference. The Consultant will perform the professional services within the timeframe more particularly set forth in Exhibit C (Time Schedule), attached to this Work Order and made a part hereof by this reference all in accordance with the terms and provisions set forth in the Agreement. Pursuant to paragraph 1.4 of the Agreement, nothing contained in any Work Order shall conflict with the terms of the Agreement and the terms of the Agreement shall be deemed to be incorporated in each individual Work Order as if fully set forth herein. EXHIBIT A SCOPE OF WORK The COUNTY desires to reconstruct the 37th Street and Indian River Boulevard intersection as to remove the acute intersection angle such that vehicular site lines are improved. Within the limits of the intersection improvement, additional auxiliary lanes consisting of dual northbound left turn and dual eastbound right turn lanes will be incorporated into the overall improvement. In addition, the intersection will be reconstructed with current standard mast -arm signalization components. The County agrees to provide (in a timely manner) the following material, data, or services as required in connection with the work to be performed under this Agreement; all of which information the CONSULTANT may use and reasonably rely upon: A. Provide the CONSULTANT with a geotechnical investigations, traffic counts, preliminary data or reports available, existing location surveys, topographic surveys, and related documents required to complete the construction documents. B. Provide the CONSULTANT with all available drawings, right-of-way maps, and other documents in the possession of the County pertinent to the project. C. The County shall make provisions for the CONSULTANT to enter upon public and private property as required for the CONSULTANT to perform his services. D. The County will promptly execute all permit applications and provide application and review fees necessary to expedite the acquisition of any local, state or federal permits made necessary by the project. E. The County will pay for all permit fees. 50 Work Order No. 11 37th Street & Indian River Blvd Intersection Improvements The PROJECT LIMITS are projected to extend 1,600 feet along 37th Street and 2,250 feet along Indian River Boulevard for a total project length of 3,850 feet (0.73 miles). A. Roadway Analysis and Plans: Roadway set of plans shall consist of the following: Notes: P — Preliminary, C — Complete, but subject to change, F - Final The plans will be prepared based upon English units. Design will be conducted in MicroStation and Geopak. The following additional data shall be utilized for development of the plans: 1. The roadway plans sheets will be drawn at a scale of 1" = 40' prepared on 11" x 17" sheets. 2. Plan sheets shall depict existing right-of-way, section lines, property lines, temporary construction easements, and centerline of construction. Horizontal control points with state plane coordinates for all PC's, PT's, curve radius, curve length and horizontal PI's shall be included on the Plan or summarized in an alignment table. 3. Plans shall include spot grades adequate to describe any proposed grading. 4. Match lines shall not be located within the limits of an intersection. 51 60% 90% 100% Cover Sheet C C F Summary of Pay Items P C F Typical Sections C C F Summary of Quantities & General Notes P C F Summary of Drainage Structures Sheets P C F Project Layout C C F Plan and Profile Sheets (40 scale) C C F Intersection Plan & Details p C F Special Details P C F Drainage Structure Sheets P C F Roadway Soil Survey P C F Cross Sections at 100 ft intervals p C F Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plans P C F Signage & Pavement Marking Plans (40 scale double plan) C C F Signalization Plans P C F Construction Cost Estimate and Quantities C C F Notes: P — Preliminary, C — Complete, but subject to change, F - Final The plans will be prepared based upon English units. Design will be conducted in MicroStation and Geopak. The following additional data shall be utilized for development of the plans: 1. The roadway plans sheets will be drawn at a scale of 1" = 40' prepared on 11" x 17" sheets. 2. Plan sheets shall depict existing right-of-way, section lines, property lines, temporary construction easements, and centerline of construction. Horizontal control points with state plane coordinates for all PC's, PT's, curve radius, curve length and horizontal PI's shall be included on the Plan or summarized in an alignment table. 3. Plans shall include spot grades adequate to describe any proposed grading. 4. Match lines shall not be located within the limits of an intersection. 51 Work Order No. 11 376 Street & Indian River Blvd Intersection Improvements 5. If applicable, soil boring information shall be plotted on cross sections with soil classification and high season water table. 6. All quantities shall reference FDOT Pay Item Numbers. 7. All details shall reference FDOT Index Numbers. 8. All specifications shall reference to County and/ or FDOT Specifications for Road and Bridge Construction. Any deviations are special specifications not included in FDOT Specifications are required in the Technical Specifications. 9. Initial, interim and Final Plan Submittal shall include the following: Three (3) Sets of Signed and Sealed Plans. ii. One (1) Opinion of Probable Construction Cost iii. One (1) CD with drawings in PDF format. iv. The CONSULTANT will provide construction documents and calculations in sufficient quantity as required by the various reviewing agencies. B. Drainage analysis and Plans: 1. Perform drainage investigations and analysis necessary to prepare a design which will drain the project in accordance with the County, St Johns River Water Management District (SJRWMD) and Army Corps of Consultants (ACOE) design criteria. The work will include the analyses for the following: a. Determine Base Clearance Water Elevation Analyze, determine, and document high water elevations which will be used to set roadway profile grades. Determine surface water elevations at cross drains, floodplains, outfalls and adjacent storm water ponds. Determine groundwater elevations at intervals between the above-mentioned surface waters. b. Design of Stormwater Management Facility Design stormwater management facilities to meet requirements for stormwater quality treatment and attenuation. Develop proposed pond layout (shape, contours, slopes, etc.), perform routing calculations, and design the outlet control structure. c. Design of Storm Drains Develop a "working drainage map", determine runoff, inlet locations, and spread. Calculate hydraulic losses (friction, utility conflict and, if necessary, minor losses). Determine Design tailwater and, if necessary, outlet scour protection. d. Drainage Design Documentation Report Compile drainage design documentation into report format. Include documentation for all the drainage design tasks and associated meetings and decisions. 2. A Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) will be developed in conjunction with this project. The site specific SWPPP is a requirement of both the EPA National Pollutant Discharge Elimination 52 Work Order No. 11 37th Street & Indian River Blvd Intersection Improvements System (NPDES) General Permit for Stormwater Discharges from Construction Activities, and the FDEP Generic Permit for Stormwater Discharges from Construction Activities. C. Jurisdicational Permitting: The Consultant shall prepare permit applications for the St Johns River Water Management District (SJRWMD) and Army Corp of Consultants (ACOE) for submittal by the County. This will consist of all required evaluation, design, coordination, and follow-up work necessary to support permit applications. The County will review the permit applications as necessary. The Consultant shall assemble and be responsible for the final submittal. The Consultant shall prepare permit sketches for submission by the County to ACOE and SJRWMD for dredge and fill activities, if necessary. The Consultant shall submit all permit sketches on 8.5" x 11" sheets. Sketches shall be neatly scaled, signed and sealed, and reproducible. 1. Environmental Resource Permitting/Section 404 Permitting The Consultant will prepare and submit the joint Environmental Resource Permit (ERP) application package to the SJRWMD and the ACOE. The application includes the ERP standard forms and a compilation of supplemental materials such as permit sketches, Vegetation (FLUCFCS), soils, quadrangle and FEMA -FIRM maps. The Consultant will coordinate on the behalf of the County with each agency identified in this task. This may include up to one (1) meeting with the agencies to discuss requests for additional information (RAI), and written responses to one (1) request for additional information (RAI) including plan modifications. This scope assumes that mitigation measures will not be necessary or required. This scope assumes that coordination with US Fish and Wildlife Service through the preparation of Biological Assessments or Biological Opinions will not be required. Permit application submittals will be made subsequent to the 60% plan set submittal approval by the County. D. Signing and Pavement Marking Plans: Signing and Pavement Marking plans shall include: Preparation of the plan layout, quantities (including signing and pavement marking quantity) and tabulation of quantities. All plans are to be prepared in accordance with the latest design standards and practices (MUTCD), FDOT Standard Specifications, Indexes, and shall be accurate, legible, complete in design and drawn at the same scale as the Roadway Plans, furnished in reproducible form. Plans will be included with the roadway plans and submitted as indicated above. E. Utility Coordination: The CONSULTANT will coordinate with franchise utility operators in the vicinity of the project such that the proposed construction activities can be developed to minimize impacts to existing utilities located within the project limits. Any utility permitting and relocation design required to accommodate the proposed improvements will be addressed as an additional service relative to this scope of work. 53 Work Order No. 11 376 Street & Indian River Blvd Intersection Improvements F. Signalization Plans: Mast -arm traffic signal configurations at the 37th Street and Indian River Boulevard intersection will be designed to meet current County and FDOT standards. Luminaires will be provided on each mast arm pole. The pole analysis and design of the signal systems will be completed and submitted to County for review. Signalization plans will be included with the roadway plans and submitted as indicated above. (THE REMAINDER OF THIS PAGE IS INTENTIONALLY BLANK) 54 Work Order No. 11 37th Street & Indian River Blvd Intersection Improvements FEE SCHEDULE The COUNTY agrees to pay and the Consultant agrees to accept for services rendered pursuant to this Agreement fees inclusive of expenses in accordance with the following: A. Professional Services Fee The basic compensation mutually agreed upon by the Consultant and the COUNTY is as fol lows: Lump Sum Components Task Labor Fee Roadway Analysis and Plans $ 89,135 Drainage Analysis and Plans $ 25,330 Erosion Control and SWPPP $ 7,750 Jurisdictional Permitting $ 23,540 Signing and Marking Plans $ 10,075 Utility Coordination $ 8,200 Signalization Plans $ 30,650 Project Total $ 194,680 (THE REMAINDER OF THIS PAGE IS INTENTIONALLY BLANK) 55 Work Order No. 11 376 Street & Indian River Blvd Intersection Improvements TIME SCHEDULE Upon authorization to proceed by the COUNTY, final design documents are expected to take approximately nine (9) months from the Notice to Proceed (NTP). NTP Upon BOCC Approval Phase II Submittal (60% Design Plans) 3 months following NTP Phase III Submittal (90% Design Plans) 6 months following NTP Phase IV Submittal (Final Design Plans) 9 months following NTP (THE REMAINDER OF THIS PAGE IS INTENTIONALLY BLANK) 56 Work Order No. 11 37th Street & Indian River Blvd Intersection Improvements IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Work Order as of the date first written above. CONSULTANT: KIMLEY-HORN A INC. By: Title: SSOCIATES, Principal d, P.E. By: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY Bob Solari, Chairman BCC Approved Date: Attest: Jeffrey R. Smith, Clerk of Court and Comptroller By: Approved: Approved as to form and legal sufficiency: Deputy Clerk Jason E. Brown, County Administrator Dylan T. Reingold, County Attorney 57 Project Name Task Summary ., , .'i`Y. 11J�1.T�'J` Summary 37th Street & Indian River Boulevard Intersection Project Manhours for project f1'.�{f�TJI���y...<�lii'el..�f?:.'1. �. >. �Y1:.: �•%:_�.:(�:�:.:�..1,..�Nrf�'.�fii i Task Principal Senior Registered Professional Designer Support Remarks Professional Professional 1 Staff $225 $200, $145 $110 $130 $60• Design Analysis 2 54 56 0 24 12 Roadway Plans 12 27 73 75 223 0 Drainage Plans 10 15 80 86 129 0 Permitting 4 38 56 20 28 18 Utility Coordination 4 10 8 24 6 12 Signing and Marking Plans 4 7. 9 15.8 36.4 0 Signalization Plans 8 39• 80 15 60 0 Tota! Hours = 44 190 362 235.8 506.4 42 Labor Fee = $9,900 $38,000 $52,490 $25,938 $65,832 $2,520 Roadway Fee = $194,680 Design Topo Fee = By County Geotechnical Fee = By County Tota! Fee =• $194,680 37th Street & IRB Workplan.xls Page 1 58 Design Analysis Activity: Design Analysis Task Principal Senior Registered Professional Designer Support Remarks Professional Professional 1 Staff Contract File 2 2 Project Coordination Geotech Sub -consultant Provided by IRCO Surveyor Provided by IRCO County Eng Dept 40 20 8 Four review submittals/ meetings Cost Estimating 4 20 20 Cost est conducted at 30%, 60%, 90% and Finals Project Specifications and Quantities 4 12 2 QC/QA 4 Project Management 4 Subtotal 4 54 52 0 20 12 Page 2 59 Rdwy Plans Activity: Roadway Plans Task Principal Senior Registered Professional Designer Support Remarks Professional Professional 1 Staff Cover Sheet 2 4 Typical Section and Notes 2 2 4 Summary of Quantities Sheet 8 16 16 2 sheets Plan/Profile Sheets 37th Street 4 11 15 45 3 sheets at 25 hrs/sht Indian River Blvd 5 15 20 60 5 sheets at 20 hrs/ sht HorizlVert Control Sheet 4 8 12 Cross Sections 37th Street 3 9 12 36 100 ft Sections plus driveways (20) @ 3.0 hrs per Indian River Blvd 3 8 10 30 100 ft Sections plus driveways (20) @ 2.5 hrs per Miscellaneous Const. Details 4 10 16 1 sheet of details @ 30hrs/sht QC/QA 12 Project Management 4 Subtotal 12 27 73 75 223 0 Page 3 60 Drainage Plans Activity: Drainage Plans Task Principal Senior Registered Professional Designer Support Remarks Professional Professional 1 Staff Drainage Analysis 37th Street 2 20 30 8 Includes cross drain design Indian River Blvd 8 10 4 Field Review 2 8 8 site visits Stormwater Management Facitity & Drainage Maps 37th Street 18 8 12 1 stormwater facilities @ 40 hrs per Indian River Blvd Summary of Drainage Structures 4 16 1 sheets at 20 hrs per sheet Drainage Structure Sheets 37th Street 2 7 10 29 12 structures at 4 hours per Indian River Blvd Stormwater Pollution Prev. Plans 37th Street 2 6 8 24 2 sheets at 10 hrs/sht Indian River Blvd 3 9 12 36 3 sheets at 10 hrs/sht QC/QA 10 Project Management 4 Subtotal 10 15 80 86 129 0 Page 4 61 Activity: Permiting Task Principal Senior Registered Professional Designer Support Remarks Professional Professional 1 Staff Pre -application Meetings SJRWMD 8 8 2 USACE 8 8 2 Preliminary Exhibits for Permit 2 4 2 8 Permit Package SJRWMD 2 8 4 4 ERP USACE 2 8 4 4 Request for Information SJRWMD 8 16 8 16 4 ACOE 4 4 2 4 2 QC/QA Project Management 4 4 ISubtotal 4 38 56 20 28 18 Permits Required SJRWMD ERP ACOE - nationwide 62 Utilities Activity: Utility Plans Task Principal Senior Registered Professional Designer Support Remarks Professional Professional 1 Staff Ex. Utility Reveiw 8 24 8 Coordination w/ Util Co.'s - Request as -built data Electrical Service Provider Coordination Mtg 6 6 4 QC/QA 4 Project Management 4 Subtotal 4 10 8 24 6 12 Page 6 63 Sign & Mark Activity: Signing and Marking Plans Task Principal Senior Registered Professional Designer Support Remarks Professional Professional 1 Staff Field Inventory 4 Plan Sheets (double plan) 37th Street 1 4 4.8 14.4 2 sheets at 12 hrs/sht Indian River Blvd 2 5 7 22 3 sheets at 12 hrs/ sht QC/QA 4 Project Management 4 Subtotal 4 7 9 15.8 36.4 0 Page 7 64 Signalization Activity: Signalization Task Principal Senior Registered Professional Designer Support Remarks Professional Professional 1 Staff 37th Street & Indian River Blvd Mast -Arm Signalization Design 20 80 60 Foundation Structural Design 15 15 QC/QA 8 Project Management 4 Subtotal 8 39 80 15 60 0 Page 8 65 00°~ 4_~oet -1,111~0•1. I^~~ 66 I Ns -----'--------- ,.. | | ( •N ` | t. \ 'C.t,b \ ' '_-----' .. | || ' | || |' ' | | | |/| / � ! | ` | \ | \ ` ��� �� ` ' \ \ � ^ \ - -~ TTI7TII H S TRE T ^-- ' ' — ~ — ___ -- �� --- —~� r ` --- � �� ` ` � �==' `. _'__'__'__A` tio ---'------ -----' -----------'----''l | \` . . ' I \ / | ° " IONS Kmv « U.41(4441 4044444 !OM e7:11:.Ir��0041.0444W0444 umox�va�mo�000m��xmwuo mrCOUNTY -------'- 5777I STREET REALIGNMENT ^=, =� °~ ° ,C="� ,, � "°n�=, xrrH SzmaErxmom«LxZArmuN oMpannoMsmTemoJErr 00°~ 4_~oet -1,111~0•1. I^~~ 66 Consent Agenda Indian River County Interoffice Memorandum Office of Management & Budget To: Members of the Board of County Commissioners From: Kristin Daniels Director, Office of Management & Budget Date: April 16, 2019 Subject: Miscellaneous Budget Amendment 010 Description and Conditions 1. On April 9, 2019, the Board of County Commissioners approved the demolition and disposal of the Wabasso Fishing Pier. Exhibit "A" appropriates insurance proceeds in the amount of $944,824 to fund the project. 2. Due to faulty electric meters, the North County Aquatics Center has received a back bill from FP&L for $55,098. Additionally, $25,457 will be needed for the electric bills going forward for this fiscal year. Exhibit "A" appropriates funding of $80,555 from MSTU/Reserve for Contingency. 3. On April 9, 2019, the Board of County Commissioners approved the Utility by Highway Contractor Agreement for Water and Sewer Construction on SR 60 and 43rd Avenue. The City of Vero Beach will reimburse the County $1,869,852 for the work. Exhibit "A" appropriates this funding. 4. Funds in the amount of $13,530 are needed due to the retirement of the Human Services employee. Exhibit "A" appropriates funding from General Fund/Reserve for Contingency. 5. Funds in several projects need to be "rolled over" to the new fiscal year. Exhibit "A" appropriates funding of $650,000 from Optional Sales Tax/Cash Forward -Oct 1st, $300 from Beach Restoration/Cash Forward- Oct 1st and $578 from General Fund/Cash Forward -Oct 1st 6. On March 26, 2019, the Board of County Commissioners approved the NexusWorx-Fiber documentation system, Project Phase -2. Exhibit "A" appropriates the funding of $292,538 from MSTU/Cash Forward -Oct 1st Staff Recommendation Staff recommends the Board of County Commissioners approve the budget resolution amending the fiscal year 2018-2019 budget. 67 RESOLUTION NO. 2019- A RESOLUTION OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AMENDING THE FISCAL YEAR 2018-2019 BUDGET. WHEREAS, certain appropriation and expenditure amendments to the adopted Fiscal Year 2018-2019 Budget are to be made by resolution pursuant to section 129.06(2), Florida Statutes; and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County desires to amend the fiscal year 2018-2019 budget, as more specifically set forth in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and by this reference made a part hereof, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that the Fiscal Year 2018-2019 Budget be and hereby is amended as set forth in Exhibit "A" upon adoption of this Resolution. This Resolution was moved for adoption by Commissioner , and the motion was seconded by Commissioner and, upon being put to a vote, the vote was as follows: Chairman Bob Solari Vice -Chairman Susan Adams Commissioner Peter D.O'Bryan Commissioner Joseph E. Flescher Commissioner Tim Zorc The Chairman thereupon declared this Resolution duly passed and adopted this day of , 2019. INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA Attest: Jeffrey R. Smith Board of County Commissioners Clerk of Court and Comptroller By By Deputy Clerk Bob Solari, Chairman BY APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGAL SUFFICIENCY COUNTY ATTNEY Resolution No. 2019 - Budget Office Approval: Kristin Daniels, Budget Director Budget Amendment: 010 Entry Number Fund/ Department/Account Name Account Number - Increase Decrease 1. Revenue Florida Boating Improvements/Cash Forward -Oct 1st 133039-389040 $944,824 $0 Expense Florida Boating Improvements/Other Contractual Services/Huntcane Matthew 13321072-033490-17001 $944,824 $0 2. Expense MSTU Fund/NCAC/Electric Services 00410472-034310 $80,555 $0 MSTU Fund/Reserve for Contingency 00419981-099910 $0 $80,555 3. Revenue Optional Sales Tax/Reimbursement/43rd Ave- 18th St to 26th Street 315038-369940-06041 $1,869,852 $0 Expense Optional Sales Tax/43rd Ave- 18th St to 26th Street 31521441-066510-06041 $1,869,852 $0 4. Expense General Fund/Human Services/Other Contractual Services 00121164-033490 $13,530 $0 General Fund/Reserve for Contingency 00119981-099910 $0 $13,530 5. Revenue Optional Sales Tax/Cash Forward -Oct 1st 315038-389040 $650,000 $0 Beach Restoration Fund/Cash Forward -Oct 1st 128039-389040 $300 $0 General Fund/Cash Forward -Oct lst 001039-389040 $578 $0 Expense Optional Sales Tax/Public Works/PC Main Relief Canal Upgrade 31524338-066510-16001 $650,000 $0 Beach Restoration Fund/Other Operating Supplies/Conservation Effort 12814472-035290-16035 $300 $0 General Fund/General Services/All Travel 00120213-034020 $578 $0 6. Revenue MSTU/Cash Forward -Oct 1st 004039-389040 $292,538 $0 Expense 1 of 4 69 Resolution No. 2019 - Budget Office Approval: Kristin Daniels, Budget Director Budget Amendment: 010 Entry Number Fund/ Department/Account Name Account Number Increase Decrease MSTU/Telecommunications/Other Professional Services 00423437-033190 $292,538 $0 2 of 4 70 Compare Munis to CIE In Munis Project Account # Archie Smith Fish House 31521072-066510-14004 $200,000 Oyster Bar 31521072-066390-18009 $0 Harmony Oaks Oyster Bar 10321072-066510-18008 10321072-066510-18009 $0 $100,000 Jones Pier 00421072-066510-18010 $0 Add account 31521072-066510-18010 New Roof Admin Bldg 31522019-066510-16003 $0 Health Dept Roof 31522019-066510-16028 $0 Courthouse 3152209-066510-16029 $0 Chillers for Admint 31522019-066510-17013 $0 Jail Roof 31522019-066510-16030 $0 HVAC 31522019-066390 encumbered 1023675 New Account Number Optional Sales Tax/Faciltities Mgmt/Courthouse Parking Garage Rennovation Half Cent sales tax new roofs at dodgertown Park/Rec Impact Fees 58th Ave ballfields 71 Should be $0 $165,000 $59,660 $0 money being used already $264,645 $240,000 $200,000 ??done?? $509,408 ??done?? 30000 in CIE- rollover = 736,310 682,422 in CIE99777 1078431 in CIE- balance=613,622 31522019-066510-xxxxx 004-17003 10321072-066510-18001 72 FG CONSENT INDIAN RIVER COUNTY MEMORANDUM TO: Jason E. Brown County Administrator DEPARTMENT HEAD CONCURRENCE: Stan Boling, AICP Community Development Director THROUGH: Roland M. DeBlois, AICP Chief, Environmental Planning & Code Enforcement FROM: Kelly Buck Code Enforcement Officer DATE: 4/11/2019 RE: Ronald and Susan Brooks' Request for Release of a Portion of an Easement at 437 N. Tangerine Square SW (Citrus Springs Village A) It is requested that the Board of County Commissioners formally consider the following information at its regular meeting of April 23, 2019. DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS The County has been petitioned by Ronald and Susan Brooks, owners of a lot at 437 N. Tangerine Square SW in Citrus Springs Village A Planned Development (PD), for release of a 10 -foot wide portion of a 25 -foot wide rear yard "Type C" landscape buffer easement. The purpose of the partial easement release request is to allow for construction of a screen enclosure (see attached maps). Similar structures have been allowed where "Type C" buffer requirements are maintained. ANALYSIS The request has been reviewed by the County Planning Division; the County Surveyor; Village "A" Homeowners Association, Inc.; and the Villas of Citrus Springs Architectural Review Committee. The County Planning Division has no objection to the request provided that required landscape for the "Type C" buffer is maintained in the remaining 15 feet of buffer, and that the screen enclosure meet required building setbacks from property lines. Other than those items (which the owners have agreed to), none of the reviewing agencies expressed an objection to the requested partial release of easement. Therefore, it is staff's position that the requested partial easement release, with the applicant's agreement to meet buffer and setback requirements, would have no adverse impacts to the subject property or to other properties. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Board, through adoption of the attached resolution, approve release of the 10 -foot portion of the 25 -foot wide landscape easement described in the resolution. 73 RONALD & SUSAN BROOKS Release of Easement Page 2 ATTACHMENTS 1. Maps depicting easement proposed for release. 2. Proposed County Resolution Releasing Easement. ease.bccmemo proj./appl. no. 2004070104/84057 74 1044114 ay.41„.4 604. CITRUS SPRINGS VILLAGE -A--P D. - PRASE II A REPLAT OF A PORTION OF CITRUS SPRINGS VILLAGE "A' -PADA, AS RECORDED iN PLAT BOOK 161. PAGE 77. OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA A PLANNED.DEVELOPMENT iN SECTION 21. TOWNSHIP 33 SOUTH. RANGE 39 EAST. INDIAN RIVER COUNTY. FLORIDA DEDICATION STATE Of 1LMDOA COUMY Or 1ND1AN RIVER RAM ALL ST MESE PAESCMS TRA1 SUITT= PAOTMERS, A TURIN GENERAL IARINERSRI?. ALE S(077E WW1 Of TML SAID UNOS QE0G1SET AND PLATTED 106RE1N AS CITRUS SPAN= VILLAGE '4' • PD9P0A6 11. A PUNNED 031031101*ENT M INDIAN RIVER COUNTY. HAS CAUSED SA10 LINOS 70 SE COMM AND PUTTED AS SEDER HEREON AND DOLS HEREBY DEDICATE AS FOLIAR U ALL STREETS AND 01GR7SOI-*AY SEDER ON TRIS FLAT ARL HEREBY DECLARED 10 01 AND SHALL 0L0AR0 50(YAft. THEY ARE DEDICATED TO AND SMALL SE TM PERPETUAL 04INTEN4NG£ ONI6AT(OR GEMS GTS SPRAYS N4ST31R 11011S01114146ASSOC/A7ION, INC. 000 TME USE AND BLMEER OF THE 00NER8 AND RESIDENTS Of GUMS SPRINGS ALL 171311E .0U7000111LS INCLUDING BUT NOT IAMB TO 1oLICE. 110E 40810.0.060 SMALL RAVE TM31 00687 70 U G0 TK MAWS 100 rot =RAT Of PE010003010 THEIR ILESFE177Y6 g1716S, A4 MILAN PROVIDERS. INCLUDING CAME rELEVI8000 SERVICES. SHALL HAVE TNL 00GHI TO 0131 TOL STRUTS I0 EHE COURSE 0f C6NS7RUAING. INSTALLING. MAMMAIN1NC AND OPERATING THEIR RESPECTIVE SERVICES AND UTILITY 31ACILITIL8, THE BOARD Of COUNTY 0311YISSf00t91S or INDIAN RIVED COUNTT.- 31L0010A SMALL RAVE NO RL5IOYSIDIIITY. DUTY 011 LIABILITY 000750EVL0 REGARDING SAID STREETS. U THE UTILITY CASUISTS AS MEN ARE DEDICATED IN PERPETUITY TO INDIAN RIVER MINTY /OR THE 661/5TRUCT/00. THATAILU100. HAIN7LMANCE AND OPERATION 0r UTILITIES BY AM 10001DL1(0 INCLUDING CABLE TELEVISION 6ERYICTS /N CO0,U9.E4E ERN SUCK GROWN Gt5 MC 01121U13005 AS MAY RE ADOPTED 1001 VIM TO TME ST THE BOARD 0f COUNTY CO6100210NEAS Or SIMIAN R14E71 COMM /!MM 11300( TARO UIIU7T LABERENTS ARE 5001EQ TO TML RR -07 or UM 10T TO RAVE A DRIVER AT TOR INGRESS/EGRESS AS APPROVER BY TEE MIRY, A) 5031 MOMS EASES:NTS AS SWAIN ARE SEAMY 6INCATED IN PERPL7UI1Y TOR GAVS1Al3RDV MC 0AINTE7A10CE Of DRAINAGE CAGLITIE6 AND SEAll. BF TM PER1CNAL MNNTp1AVCE 0011CA7100 of TRE V11LA6E 'A' XOYL00N1AS ABSOGATION. 104 INDIAN BIP(* 1013707 SHALL NAVE TM NCM SLIT NOT IKE OBIIGATIOM TO PERMS EYPX.0XC1 MAINTENANCE OR 5.910 EASNR77 MINT YARD DRAINAGE EASEMENTS ARE SINEW TO TEE RIGH' 01 EAU, LOT N ARE A 08[301741 FOR IN6RES.S/EG._. AS APPA0YE0 BY THE COUNTY, 14) TBE URDSUIE EASEK7T5 0330 AUr7IAS ARE RIAERV D0DETATLO'7D u0 SNAU. 01 701077031370115 VA1NTENASGL 00110170030 M Or T 0000.4 ,' -A' 0OMES0WERS ASSOGAT1013, TMG. TEL ITNL 0000 M NOT THE 0DU0ATION TO_PLEFORNMAIMENMGSOM SAID EASEMENTS. 0) TRACT 1..0 15 000)CAT00 TO AND SHALL RE THC PERPETUAL MAINTENANCE 0*11GA70N Or TEE VILLAGE 'A- NDMEOENLRS ASSOCIATION. INC /0R REMAINS AND DRAINAGE PURPOSES. INDIAN R11'ER =NTT SMALL RAVE THE RIGHT BUT E07 TEE OBLIGATION TO PLNOA0 MRCS 21 00177106016500031031541010460 A-0 0) AIL ROAD 1004775-0r SAY ARE 116D1CA7ED TO 100700 aria =NIT AS 4TIUTY 00050077018.30014130131317 00.13111 RAS TRC RIGH f0 CANSTRUC7, OPERATE ARO NAIMAIM MAIER AND SLYER DRUMS *01030 SND 0060T6-00 PAT. 1) TEE LAU MAINTENANCE EASL0LMS ARE HEREBY DEDICAR:0 TO AND SHALL BL /of 1501001VAt 34011[NASt1 O7L164710N Of 1K WILMA 'A' HolUDON:RS ASSOGATIOR, INC. IEE NEO: 3000MENANGE INDUS AVER COWRY SNAIL NAVE THE =MT BUT NOT ENE OBLICATpN TO USE THE EASE7EMS To MIME 0AIMLNAVCE ON TRACT5 M 410 A-1. tEHfE7VA1 N61000µ0 MA.SY 10016 1 NENY/1 Er4'L00NIO/NC09 43500f441100,100NG1ro0 00655050974 010070 Of PAY AND OMEN AREAS WITHIN CITRUS SPNNCS. 10 E1NLSR 0NLRE0F. THE ABOVE NAND ?4310031050701 065 CAUSED ?MESE PALM TS TO AT SIGNED 64 CORA A HALEY. 0667010. Of MND 77.6. ITS CORPORATE GENERAL FANNER 007' ANO ERR )N{ AUTIURRY of RS HARD Of DIMMERS. `.^Kl /"�C r��!✓v1 A TR! 5 OAT or 1." EOM RN[SS Er: KLM N0M1. E• s r MYRA TRR�CO�0470 ( ItAL PIN AATNER SNDA FITNESS. AA+4A4 S � SUNTREE PARTNERS A f A GENERAL IAR1M3ISRIP, PNM NAME: 9.111i1.. Sh0#0.114 ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO DEDICATION SPATE Of MAMA COU0fr or INDIAN RIVER THE I/8/601116 IISTSUITT EAS AGRNOIl5DCEO BEIORE V£ TRIS SAT 01 Wo6A0� EO04, 07 MRA A. HALEY. PRESIDENT Of 0101, INC. CORPORATE GENERAL PAR70T11 OP =HIRER FARRIERS. A FLORIDA ((('5141.54071000571100060001! Of The PA17NTRSH1P, ORE 1S IIRSD1ALLY 0.140E14 00 RE AND TAME AN OATS. NOTARY MU& PRINTED 060E i 40.617._s•. . 0( C6SS70.R ,Do 007111 IV ",, .317 YT OMISSION EXPIRES-D.4f• %q.%00 r MORTGAGEES CONSENT STATE' 0/'11RLRfMIQRi1 OR/n•+hC TOL 3100E0S/6600 Miff MIMES PRAT R IS Tiff 1331070 0r 000061OES. UENS OR OMR E010000A763S UM THE PROEM 07900910 STEM AND 0= SEREST ION 1N AO CONSENT To TSL DEOI6AT700 Br TSL mom TNEREOT AND AOETfs tog 17(1. 00R7GACES. NESS AND 07MER FICUMBRANCPS OMEN ARE ACCORDED IN OP3KIAL RET000 DOOR aef.1.9(3 100. AND 0171GAL RECORD MA Rot FAGS 0745 OF TIE 171004E EMUS 0r 101441 R1Yp0 count, 1'IR •N• SD ILI. 61 LVDOIDI1007ED TO FSE REDICA7NN SEM MER,EGN. 00 OTTNTSS 08EREOf. TOL SAID CARR SAS CAUSED TR.E PRESENTS TO PE 910057 EY RS_YJ6 P1N01*K ST AND EMI TRE AUEEOA1TT or ITS MED Or DIRECTORS THIS ULDAY Of J7093 0 (04 040011)4 0 NA / �- •(rr� 1 .-� DT: N '11N10A SA7M0fAl00Ay �J Tr(-S�� DY: DATE -44.10.1... PA/A7 NAIQ;.A:�3 �f rail • �+ PRNESS- Ppp 1E.� m. �A. 0100 N00NI.,n4. e•I1I1 - M. I570ni3Ow ACKNOWLEDGEMENT TO MORTGAGEE'S, CONSENT STATE Of FLORIDA TT COUNor tib ORNJyE Ah 7HL 1QEEOC1OS 165 44SNOPlE6CE0 EL7ORE K TEl5/ILDAY DF_Hav CWC. ET 1 '"4w . J. 8484... TNL,IIre v1C5R1317L 6 049111'14 0 0& MA 00 BESAV Of SND 0400.W50115 ILRSORA4Y 51NA1RS0 0r OR IROMGED 48 1DLN71r/CAT0OR. raw NAY£ $LLiol+UI b. &dm LOCATION SKETCH 315513074 PROJECT SITE A D« A. :. DATE OAY/D 0 JONES. ISAL T1<1.12: 1 t. 1171 SRN SPACE. SCUM 31P00430 SCAED EL tt100 WA 40.1 1 �,01{ : 71:,1011i333 t[ LAb��AAAA']]]1112 4.4 7c h 1- El. ?ONNSHIP 13 SOUTH, RANCE 00 EAST 00310ARTS MM0t6T1ONS. OR RESERVATIONS 0011310701709 MIMED` 00 USES 0f THE 075,010301180800 /N T615 /UT AK FILED IN 01F1CAL RECORD ROOK 176. PACE 106.1901 MUG RECORDS 01 IMAM RIVER RUNTY, 1l0H1M LEGAL DESCRIPTION A PARCE). Or LAD 09101 A FERMOO OF CITRUS SPRINGS VILLAGE -A'AO ACCORDING TO T01 PUT THEREOF, AS RECORDED 111 PLAT 0000 30 PALL 77. Of TM MUG RECORDS Of INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA SAID PARCEL =LAMED AS MIENS; TRACTS 1..0. Ad MO A-ID.101R7131 STRINGS VILLAGE -A --PO. ACC0011)14 TO TEE PUT 10!00201 A0 RECORDED IS PLAT 0000 NL PACE A, of TNL PUMA =COEDS Of OMAN )1VER COUNTY. FLORIDA ALSO DLSYRID31D AS: A roA6I. 0r tAND LYING IN MOM "ft 1011S0IP 13 SOUTH. RANCE Al EAST. INDIAN R01020 f 371311, 1000173.0556010E7AS 1011406. MINUTESPCT MSSOME 10 I/4fGCOSNRID R OF SAID , SECTIO9 Pt MEN 0 1755110 40 C[CKES TO IOTA net MT: THEME 7031 00RHW ST DECREES Of r RRA AP1 crt S 9!171706' Vi L0013NC4 -a ID. AWDRDMG TO TRE PUT 003103101. AS RECORDED FII PUT DOM IO PACE 77,05 TRE ?VCUG RECoRf�O0S,SOf0fDINDIAN M'ER =KY FONDA. AND THE £EPoI T of BWSN10010 Or INS NDS �.6AW04 005 PARCEL OM RACING 0f' 8NP T�6AD1SE 1704*C1 of 731.101317 fF b] Top1f2 SORB 0 (WORSTS R NIMRES 00 SECONDS RM. A 01STANCE Or 10071 MT TO Tor Awn 0r 010VATURE Of A IO.Y-TANCOT =EVE. CONCAVE TO 105 $OUTEREST. RAVING A RADIUS Of 10000 FEET. A CENTRAL ANGIE Or OF DEGREES 33 0IN1IfE6 13 01060S. ANDA GOAD 0r L3300 /PLT REARING 00110 TO DECAMP O DM= R SECONDS EAST: THENCE 601/111AOT ALEN; SAID WRVS A 01STANCE Of 03700 PEA: 7REMCt SURD 0 DECREES 0 NINI7ES A SECONDS NEST A DISTANCE Or 41270 1E17: MSC( WEEN N DECREES 44 01NUTES 33 SI'LONDS 0E9r. A INSTANCE 0111000 TW: TNERC0 600)70 0 REGALES D MINUTES A 8310695 MLA DISTANCE Of RN FELT. TEEM 001770 63 7560055 W EMUS 136!'101107 REST, A INSTANCE 0113000 /PET: THERU 00070 0 DECREES D EMIRS 77 SECONDS CAST 4 DISTANCE Of f7074 MT: THEME NOM* 01 MALES CD MINUTES 33 91000103 Pm. A DMA= 0I ROW IW: TOMS SOWN 0 DECREES 0 011ME6 A 8L1ARU5 FEST. A DISTANCE of 0019 fur TREKS NORIA e3 DECREES 40 M1NUfUS E3 SECONDS EMT. A DISTANCE Of 000 W AYR: THENCE MITE 0 DECREES 0 0INUTE8 A SECONDS REST A INSTANCE Of 610 0717: 7131X6 MUM ES RI SE ES AS 11730!316 03 5EC00DS SLB!, A DISTMGE Of ROW 1591; 4000 MVO 0 OEORE(S 0 0100115 A WANDS EAST .00 DISTANCE Of 00010 FEET 70 IDE MINT OF 020300I.NG. CONTAINING 01014 ACRES. MORE 000 LESS. SWAM - -. - 4' CO(N/SS(00 0 i.011%108 Ij PNN7 NAVE - . - • R • IR C011117551013 EXPIRES 10.0.000 TITLE CERTIFICATE In LANDS AS 66CN=L0 AND OWN RR TRIS PLAT AK N TEP EASE 01. AND AKA DEI =RD TITLE 19 HELD SY SWEET PARTNERS. A FI0Ef0A GENERAL PAOTRLAS0IP. AND ALL TARES NAVE BEEN FAIR 00 SAID 1ROPE017 AS MONAD Y 9117132. rLO01DA STATUTES AND THE O17IGAL MORD BODS MD P4031 WEBERS Of A4 MORTGAGES. LIENS. ON OTHER DIO NERAACES AGAINST TEE LAND AND THE NAVES OF ALL PE100008 M UNK AN :MEREST IN SUES 1031045E LIEN OA ENCVNARANC0B ARE LISPED 1511019, Ci/ttGAL RECORD SOON 130, /ACE RA /N FAVOR Of TWIST WOW NATIONAL WE NM ?MEN AS E4GROV/A 9.41(6. MA 0111GAL 011000 00000 1317. PACE 1747 100 1001000 OI FIRST UMW NAT10A1 BANE IO11 AN00N AS PA000VIA SANE. NA ALL IN Tit PUBLIC *3150005 Of INDIAN RIVES (ANTI, f10RIDA DATED mrs 7 / EWA Br. 1.11176 E. NfALY.'AYtORNET AT IAV CERTIFICATE OF APPROVAL BY 17.400 M COUNTY COIf0ISS00NER8 PLAT BOOK IS PAGE 10 DOCKET NO,l599598 1115 IS TO =RIM THAT DV MA40. O ILO Of /Sprit ND4.7111 10058 1106 FLAT PAS APPROVED AND EM *DAD 0IGRS-0F-GAY AS UTILITY EASEMENTS MD ENE UIILITT LAMENTS ARE MEREST ACGPRED Sr IK MED Of COUNTY COV111SSI0NER0 0f INDIAN MYER COUNTY. rtOR/DA G(A10fAN or on BOARD 4�i4sG,wJAGJ.C�i:w ''y CESRR Of ERE 00gR0V00 AS TD PONY (AUNIT ArT010104/1/ CERTIFICATE ERMINES AND AMROY PROAL MIS ./9 AONINSTOA1OR CERTIFICATE OF CLERK STATE 0/' E M10A GOWN Or 1001411 RAVER .DAY Or 77Lr 1.15175910 A DAMOR, DERE 01 INE CIRCUIT COMM Or RADIA RIVER 001017.010.9101. DD PEWIT CURDY 10463 *AYE OXAVINEO THIS PUT M C17IN1 �SPIVNCS-VILLIGE 'A"fO • INOSE 11 ANO TMA:41.k_.,,;;;„.... COI .3315ERX190000CVE01901 L A 01 EERSTMC UOS 031 11!31STATE M RANOA AND*-IIYD70(5 DAY OE 4ANDDtDAV1ALfl0A1LAT 80N 15 117E OFFICE 061P 0TNT KENT Or MS CA i WI/M Of 1ND1M RIYCR COUNrV. EW1DA /0(� p p %,•N'O1EMRLT 0 00017005'07: (.AA71 .! t•:J •`� IN AM SER =RR ORM r A D .0•4iCOUNTY SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE '. REVIEWED EY TSE. UNDCRSk �IRIS FUT Of wows RPM= YESSIONNAL SURVEYOR AND MAPPE R IIOY 031 NDURDAS � ?L 1 _` .. COYISSRNTAS Or 1N01AN RIVER mon. ICE CONTORVITY 70 THE RERUIRtVERT8 Of GRAFTER m DE TEE /10110A ETAAM319. - : Y- 015/1510 0801(. (0 1 0 RIVER NLIN'IY SUIEOLYIA AND YAPPER AEOIST 01 .., b. 17,.1 EDS DAfCD2M�1ODy.20vA SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE kW A1C DEN SY THESE PRESENTS TEAT in UNDERS056E0, ECM A STATE Or - 11.01UOA 1)66*0ED AND 0EG1STpE5 31000350041,55101700 ANO RAPIER WES 17905031 CERTIFY MAT 013 SWERBER R. NOT NE COVRETED TK SUEVET 0/ ENE LOW AS SROEN R0 THE 0ORCO104 PLR: THAT SAID PLAT IS A CON= /RE5[MA700 K THE LEVDS MUM 0ffi=018E0 9X0 PUTTED 0R SUBDIVIDER IRAs 13SRAPT REUE D= 110911TNT8 AND PERMANENT CC.MROL DYNES NAVE HIEN SET AS REQUIRED BY CHAPTER 177 11UAIDA STAINES ASO TME INDIAN R(V9R MIRE MUIR ISM AND PUTTING 0000NMGE; MAT ALL WRVS? • INFORMATION SHORN MEAT MWS ISE REOVIREYENTS Of TRE MOS MILD ORDER C3.A69 I STANDARDS TEAT THIS PUT NWS ENE 0E0910L1TNT3 Of OWNER M. [100101 STAT�.TES. AND THAT SAID [ANTI TS LOCATED IN INDIAN RIVER COWRY. fL0010A DATE.. /.� SICKED '090!000 1:44 /1007CS5100AL SURVEYOR AND YAPPER 'LICENSE METER AID7. STATE Of FONDA 400V698: SUR 11T0 3 AM VERO KFACM. 10614000 63003e0 THIS 1005TRU13117 /WARM 611 10 R1V15(00 DATE OAY/D 0 JONES. ISAL 1171 SRN SPACE. SCUM 31P00430 SCAED EL tt100 � DATE Of 3OEPAAAT/ON, 0/11/1001 i� RS4195 PER IRS h SHEET 1 OP SHEETS 75 CITRUS SPRINGS VILLAGE ""A ""-P,D, - PHASE II A REPLAT OF A PORTION OF CITRUS SPRINGS VILLAGE "A"-P.D.. AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 16. PACE 77 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY. FLORIDA A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT IN SECTION 21. TOWNSHIP 33 SOUTH, RANCE 39 EAST. INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA POINT OF BEGINNING NW CORNER TRACT A10 00 0 00 700 100 SCAF-LE, 18 30' 10ET N 0735727r 1327.80' MEET :DARTER CORNER s0GT100 OL N 461056'4 374070' POINT OF COMMENCEMENT SMITH QUARTER GORIER sEGT/AN LI CURVE TABLE NORAD/US 0E5TA ARL TAN 8/6006D GN 8EA8/86" 18 7500' 25/0931' 3253' 18.74' 3207' S 2454177 19 7500' 12'08"OS' 1589' 757' 1595' S 0675707/ 20 50.00' 894070 7825 4377 7011 S 4413643E 21 5800' 9079'40" 7883' 5029' 70.91 S 452/774 12 7500' 694020 1/739' 7457' 10576' S 443943E 23 2500' 894020' 3913' 2485' 5525' S 4436435 24 2500' 907949' 39.4/' 2514' 3546' S 4521574 25 7500' 2705"59' 3547' 18,07 3514' N 3702078 P6 7500' 26'56'05' 3195 /727' 3360 S 7733047 57 7500' 16.3650' 2324' 1171' 53/5' S 817048E 28 7500 2358476' 3080' 153f 30,00' S 6120:705 29 7500' 247444 3173' /610' 3/49 S 974110E 30 7500 24/444 3175 1810' 3149' S 1379567 35 7500' 907940' 11824' 7143" /0637 S 4321174 43 7500' 013115" /99 100' 139' S 0034754' 44 /5000' 359758' 9530' 4965' 9428' N 3409507 45 15000' /6'0740' 41.56' YELP .41.82' N 0749737 46 /5000 573935' /37,86' 7425 )1306- S 363/73.4 L PROFD5L0 STRUCTURES 10 RE SINGLE TAMELY LOTS £ NmN9/8W Y1(/3FLZONE AE PAE1101MNUM£R 720MOIEMA83, EE & 110 GON5TR11CTION, TRE£5, 011 SHRUBS SOU BE PLACED IN EASEMENTS MRMOUT MTV APPROVAL 4 THERE MAY BE ADDITIONAL RESTRICTIONS THAT ARE NOT RECORDED ON THIS PUT WEIGH MAT BE FOUND 10 TEE THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF 0N01AN RISER mum'. 0, THE NORTH UNE OF THE SUBJECT /80PER/0.. BCTREEN THE /OUNO PERMANENT REFERENCE 57NVME7TS. IS ASSURED TO REM S OYF0OYE, AND ALL OTHERBE.WNGS ARE RELATIVE THERETO. 0. 1R PBM IS'DICATEB PERMANENT REFERENCE 00000627 4 0000 SET Q1 INDICATES PERMANENT 9520RENCE MONUMENT 40003 FOUND • FCP INDICATES AT/BORSET • DEDICATES ANGLE 81 OR P.C. BOUNDARY. PROPERTY, OR ROM, UNE '50,58, • NATIONAL GEODETIC VERTICAL DATUM LO28 AD/DRIVEN!. a (R) - RADIAL DE - DRAINAGE EASEMENT •.AE - ACCESS LAMENT ' I/O - MUTT EASEMENT 1310 - LANE MAINTENANCE EASEMENT NAD - NORTH AMERICAN DATUM NOTICE - FLOOD HA7ARO NARNINC IND/AN /133/88..97166988�9900(( 11 RIVER FARMS WATER CONTROL DISTRICT SOUTH RELIEF CANAL 250' RICHT OF WAY -'83' BU/GOING SETBACK S 992833E 75118 4500 4500' 45.69 45.00' 43,00' 416 32 33 34 35.36 00 37 h h h ''J h r•F0' 044/2305 9 11II1/T7 EAS 7540 13148' /017! 4500' ti r 31t $ TH11 PROPERTY NAY BE S1.18/E6T TO FLOODING DURING A 100 YEAR BASE FLOOD EVENT. ToU SHOULD CONTACT LOCAL BUILDING AND TONING 059020ALS AND OBTAIN TBE LATEST INFORMATION REGARDING /1400 ELEVATIONS AND RESTRICTIONS ON DEVELOPMENT Won HONG PLANS FOR TIE USE OF THIS PROPERTY, FWD 00751 BASE FLOOD EL5045000 FOR THE PROPERTY IOCLUD£0 1N 7115 PLAT DS 820 96,V0. VI 4, 29.30 ry 28 S 5,483tSE 132.23' 272398 S 09'46'97£ 115.00' S 8999''49',01T /3500' S 88 5 B SYE 13500' 24 S 84233'7 15500' a SDE 0.15 22 S 89'4633'£ 15500' 1i $ S 89'483,7.5 K 1 15500' 1 20 S 89'1033 I 119 \ 15500• 5' ACCESS EASED NT PER PLAT BOOK /8 PACE 77 1186376610 83538/102 LINE TABLE Line B4ann9 Distance LDS 897853E 710' L7 978'575 750' LIP 407878500 1/3 N 19/8337 29.98' CPS NOTE THE STATE PLANE COORDINATES SNOW HEREON ARE DOSED UPON THE FLORIDA EAST TONE STATE /LANE COORDINATE SYSTEM HAD 7900 ADJUSTMENT AND MERE ESTABLISHED USING INDIAN RIVER COUHTT MOhVM6J4S OPS 47 AND GPS 48 R5 CONTROL STATIONS, •l. S -07 r. n. 4 „ ENT 7y PLAT BOOK 18 PAGE I DOCKET NO 1599598 SUBJECT LOT 38 254007 HIDE TYPE G r -r BUTTER LANDSCAPE I EASEMENT PROJECT BENCHMARK 1 TOP OF PRM 211 AGED 4100' 39 � 8 h .97 S00'37077,, 3022' w 20! 0.8154'35 NORTH TANGER/NZSX17 "Y36a S4UARA' SW "— y 0 00 37500 50' PR/VAT 18/07 T ISA)' 11 ITT', OF PS„ 1_ /0 DR TRACE 4 UT/ I £ASE EAT - L <2S i5 `( e t 87 88 89 90 1 T L, 44D.or o ' 85 ° a86 '8 $ g 91 ' 92 14 .: � � L6 01 04 snE- 1 >. � ; I*41 > E-'' t 70.00' 52.50• 7.50' /SAO" e ' 1 /3000' 2 W I S 99'2 'S3' ,y S 892839'£ I W 45 Ig Q4> ! p' (. ♦ TRACT 'A-5' o aIps RECREATION 93 a C I N8940 ' I y d �I` RECRE T IQ 4+-6UE „ S 8948'93'£ I ' j 430.08' g a� C y•l-(4.),.� 6vEE8 w000 - i'ii 46 y -s ss-4Bzr y- c 5'" S-RgY4B4.i3—{ C.I W `.1— rJO.OJ $' , u ` 1 -755°6"- $1W. . -'0 NB�B937F I$ a ti '� W 0.Y c , s 89'4933 £I.j$) V . 1 130.00' I ',i f 8948'37 F R y ) 48 a 1 13000' E.. z .' w$ 96 i N 89'49137 *I b sB82TrP h ¢a a 58040931E 0)/ h 49 i% t h' ,.o. WI p r3ooD h $ 87 %, / e l, N89' 85,57, q 5I PS' g 8t89904T7 [-4••, O. 2 5 '4 15 Fair. tar 13008' E �� I W 5 /50 1$�. MAINTENANCE EASEMENT ill 18000 $ 98 1 26175' - 15600 1 80 , N 89'4931'1 o N 93'49337 18000 130.06 51 99 s 00%/277 17.14• 5 1LOlA 1 42 14 N B8'407P'E (111'" & 43 89'48'337, k � .rADEh h 1500' 3750'- 12.10' 1 130.00 44 4'09'48'337 8978'53'1 181,00 5. 84 v 89'4873'7 •I 1300' 83 CITRUS SPRINGS VILLAGE "A" PD PLAT BOOK 16. PAGE 77 PROPERTY MINERS ARE PROHIBITED FROM PLANTING ANY CARIBBEAN FRUIT PLY HOST PLANT AS SPECIFIED BELOR AND .ARE OE001RED TO REMOVE ENE SAME. 11 ANT EXISTS: 64111.6 GUAVA, COMMON GUAVA, LOQUAT. ROSE APPLE. SURINAM CHERRY. THIS INSTRUMENT PREPARED 8Y : DAv/o M. /ONES PROFESSIONAL SURVEYOR 1 MAPPER 3899 09T9 SQUARE VERO BEACH.FL 00980 PHONE (772)87-9870 NILE THIS PLAT AS RECORDED IN ITS GRAPHIC FORM, IS THE OFFICIAL DEPICTION OF INE SUBDIVIDED LANDS 625501BED HEREIN AND MILL 1N NO OROUM1140250 BE SUPPLANTED IN AU1NORm BY ANY OTHER CRAPRIC OR DIGITAL PAIR or THE PUT. THERE MAY 8E ADDITIONAL RES7R06110NS THAT ARE NOT RECORDED ON THIS PLAT TWAT MAY BE FOUND IN THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF THIS (=RTY, N071G@ ROUTINE MAINTENANCE (e. VOTING. ETC) Or EASENENTE SHALL BE THE RESPO.sI01U1T of TME LOT/ PRPOER71 MINERS AND N07 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY. THE MINIMUM FINISH FLOOR AND NEGHANICAL EQUIPMENT PAD ELEVATIONS tali ALL JOTS HUMIN /HIS PLAT IS £0.10 8078, SHEET 2 OF 2 SHEETS 76 II, BOOK 18, PAGES OUNTY, FLORIDA. Lore' 4i I! 1.0WINYE=I / n il FINAL SURVEY L INDIAN RIVER FARMS WATER CONTROL DISTRICT SOUTH RELIEF CANAL • 250' RIGHT OF WAY S 89'28'53" E S 89'28'53' E (M) 45.00' (P) AND (M) TOP OF BANK 4 S+MALE��+ LOT 37 • TOP OF BANK 0 17.30' 10' WIDE EASEMENT PORTION PROPOSED FOR RELEASE 25.00' WOE LANDSCAPE EASEMENT ai COVERED CONCRETE PA110 13.12' 10.00' 0/S R CONCRETE A/C SLAB ELEVATION a h� y,D '( 22.95 a u§ .4.00 NSSS 8 " 2�no• EC COvEREDCONCREIE PORCH n 10.00' WIDE DRNNACE AND WI= EASEMENT N 00'31'07" E (P) - N 00'31'07" E (M) CONCRETE AOEWAUN WATER METERS CONCRETE SIDEWALK --- 0.67' mix axiom BLOCK WALL ON PROPERTY UNE - 10.33' ri l , 19.67' 17.0' WIDE CONCRETE DRIVEWAY el 15:00' 0/5 a O O enin 21.7 33 00 bb 0 0 U1 Ui LOT 39 N 89'28'53" W (P) N 89'28'53" W (M) 45:00' (P) AND (M) CABLE 1Eli74S10N SD110E TELEPHONE SERVICE ELECTRIC SERVICE 25.00' (P) AND (M)• U D" EDGE, OFIPAVETNENT 45.00' (P) AND (M) LINE ONE N 89'28'53" W (P) N 89'28'53" W, (M) S 00'31'07" W (P) S 00'31'07' w(m) • 25.00' (P) AND (M) -'2.0' WIDE CONCRETE VALLEY CURER f FOUND P9 NM. 1N 09455 f'- WASHER PCP 1.5 3909 (PDIt4T OF CURVATURE) SET PK NAIL 04 DISK. / N 99'28'53" W (M) SITE EN PNMMN945 N 89'28'53" w (P) ELEVATION - 10.90 (BASIS OF BEARINGS) NORTH TANGERINE SQUARE SW (50' PRIVATE RIGHT-OF-WAY) 4CHMARK REFERENCE: JND 4" X 4" CONCRETE MONUMENT WITH ASS SCREW IN CENTER AT THE NORTHWEST RNER OF THE PLAT OF LEGEND LAKES, P.D. ASE 1. ELEVATION = 21.57 NATIONAL )DETIC VERTICAL DATUM OF 1929. UNE ONE SET PK NAIL IN DISK ROWNS PLS 4945 .--SITE BENCNN RK ONE ELEVATION - 20.34 LEGEND: Q = SET 5/8' IRON REB4R WITH CAP ROWNS P.L.S. NUMBER 4945 • = SET PK NAL IN DISK ROWNS PLS. NUMBER 4945 QO = MANHOLE = CATCH BASIN = FIRE HYDRANT = WATER METER 0 = WOOD POWER POLE = CONCRETE POWER POLE = ANCHOR AND GUT WIRE_ • • -- = OVERHEAD WARES = NOT TO SCALE — X - = FENCEUNE 12.99' (P) 12.99' (M) ( NOTES: 1) LANDS SHOWN HEREON WERE NOT ABS FOR. EASEMENTS, OWNERSHIP AND/OR -OF-WAYS OF RECORD. 2) NO UNDERGROUND OR INTERIOR IMPRO' WERE LOCATED EXCEPT AS NOTED. 3)LEGAL DESCRIPTION AS SUPPLIED BY C 4BUILDING TIES ARE 90' OR RADIAL TO PROPERTY LINE. 5) AU. EASEMENTS .SHOWN ARE PER RECC UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. DATE OF LAST FIELD WORK: 09/22/2005 PLOT GATE ANO TIME 09/27/2005 3:45 LOT SQUARE FOOTAGE: 0.134± ACRE SCALE: 1" = 20' 77 RESOLUTION NO. 2019 - A RESOLUTION OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, RELEASING A PORTION OF AN EASEMENT ON LOT 38, CITRUS SPRINGS VILLAGE "A" PD PHASE II WHEREAS, Indian River County has an interest in a 25 -foot wide rear yard landscape easement on Lot 38 of Citrus Springs Village "A" PD Phase II; and WHEREAS, Ronald R. Brooks and Susan K. Brooks, the owners of the lot, have made application to Indian River County requesting that the County release a 10 -foot portion of the easement; and WHEREAS, the owners have agreed to satisfy county landscape requirements within the remaining 15 -foot width of the easement not proposed for release, and to meet county building setback requirements for a proposed screen enclosure to be constructed within the 10 -foot easement portion proposed for release; and WHEREAS, based on those agreed to conditions, the retention of the 10 -foot portion of the easement, as described below, serves no public purpose; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida that: INDIAN RIVER COUNTY DOES HEREBY RELEASE and abandon all right, title, and interest that it may have in the following described easement portion: the south ten (10) feet of the north twenty-five (25) foot rear yard Type "C" Buffer Landscape Easement of Lot 38, Citrus Springs Village "A"P.D. Phase II, according to the replat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 18, Page 10 of the Public Records of Indian River County, Florida. This partial release of easement is executed by Indian River County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, whose mailing address is 1801 27th Street, Vero Beach, Florida 32960. THIS RESOLUTION was moved for adoption by Commissioner , seconded by Commissioner , and adopted on the 23rd day of April, 2019, by the following vote: Chairman Bob Solari Vice -Chairman Susan Adams Commissioner Joseph E. Flescher Commissioner Peter O'Bryan Commissioner Tim Zorc The Chairman declared the resolution duly passed and adopted this 23rd day of April, 2019 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA By: Bob Solari, Chairman ATTEST: Jeffrey R. Smith, Clerk of Court and Comptroller By: Deputy Clerk 78 RESOLUTION NO. 2019 - APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: County Attorney ease.bccdoc proj/apl. no. 2004070104/84057 Cc: Applicant: BROOKS, RONALD R & SUSAN K 437 N TANGERINE SQ SW VERO BEACH, FL 32968 79 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA MEMORANDUM CONSENT TO: Jason E. Brown, County Administrator THROUGH: Richard B. Szpyrka, P.E., Public Works Director FROM: James W. Ennis, P.E., PMP, Assistant Public Works Director SUBJECT: FDOT Small County Outreach Program (SCOP) Agreement and Resolution Authorizing the Chairman's Signature for 49th Street/Lindsay Road From 58th Avenue to 31st Avenue and Construction Engineering Inspection (CEI) Services Project No. IRC -1414, FM No. 436850-1-54-01 DATE: April 9, 2019 DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS Indian River County applied for and received a Small County Outreach Program (SCOP) Grant from the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) in the amount of $832,547.00 for the resurfacing of 49th Street from 58th Avenue to 31st Avenue as well as for Construction Engineering Inspection (CEI) services (estimated total cost for the project is $1,110,063.00). The proposed improvements will include milling of existing pavement, installation of superpave asphaltic concrete, curb and gutter, guardrail upgrades, sodding, and installation of thermoplastic pavement markings. The County's portion is estimated to be $277,516.00. FUNDING Per the SCOP grant agreement, the County must fund the project and then request reimbursement of the grant share from FDOT to a maximum amount of $832,547.00 of the total cost for the project. Funding for the County's cost share in the amount of $277,516.00 of the estimated cost is budgeted in the Account No. 10921441-053360-17027/Secondary Roads/49th St Resurface 58th Ave to 31st Ave. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends the Board of County Commissioners approve the Small County Outreach Program (SCOP) Agreement and Resolution and authorize the Chairman to execute the same. ATTACHMENTS 1. Indian River County Grant Form 2. Authorizing Resolution 3. FDOT Small County Outreach Program (SCOP) Agreement FM No. 436850-1-54-01 APPROVED AGENDA ITEM FOR APRIL 23, 2019 80 C:\Users\legistar\AppData\Local\Temp\BCL Technologies\easyPDF 8\@BCL@780E773D\@BCL@780E773D.doc GRANT NAME: FDOT Small County Outreach Program (SCOP) 49th St/Lindsay Rd from 58th Ave/CR-613 to 31st Ave GRANT # 436850-1-54-01 AMOUNT OF GRANT: $832,547.00 DEPARTMENT RECEIVING GRANT: Public Works CONTACT PERSON: James W. Ennis P.E., Asst Public Works Director TELEPHONE: (772) 226-1221 1. How long is the grant for? Until June 30, 2021 Starting Date: When signed by FDOT 2. Does the grant require you to fund this function after the grant is over? 3. Does the grant require a match? If yes, does the grant allow the match to be In -Kind services? 4. Percentage of match to grant 25 Yes X No X Yes No Yes X No 5. Grant match amount required 777,516 6. Where are the matching funds coming from (i.e. In -Kind Services; Reserve for Contingency)? This is budgeted and funded with Secondary Roads gas tax — fund 109. 7. Does the grant cover capital costs or start-up costs? Yes X No If no, how much do you think will be needed in capital costs or start-up costs: $ N/A (Attach a detail listing of costs) 8. Are you adding any additional positions utilizing the grant funds? If yes, please list. (If additional space is necded, please attach a schedule.) Yes X No Acct. Description Position Position Position Position Position 011.12 Regular Salaries $ 1,110,063.00 Second Year $ $ $ 011.13 Other Salaries & Wages (PT) Fourth Year 012.11 Social Security Fifth Year 012.12 Retirement — Contributions 012.13 Insurance — Life & Health 012.14 Worker's Compensation 012.17 S/Sec. Medicare Matching TOTAL _ 9. What is the total cost of each position including benefits, capital, start-up, auto expense, travel and operating? Salary and Benefits Operating Costs Capital Total Costs 10. What is the estimated cost of the grant to the county over five years? $ 277,516.00 Signature of Preparer: Date: 81 Grant Amount Other Match Costs Not Covered Match Total First Year $ 832,547.00 $ $ 277,516.00 $ 1,110,063.00 Second Year $ $ $ $ Third Year Fourth Year $ Fifth Year Signature of Preparer: Date: 81 RESOLUTION NO. 2019 - RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA AUTHORIZING THE CHAIRMAN'S EXECUTION OF A SMALL COUNTY OUTREACH PROGRAM (SCOP) AGREEMENT WITH THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (FDOT) FOR 49TH STREET/LINDSAY ROAD FROM 58TH AVENUE/CR-613 TO 31ST AVENUE RESURFACING AND CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING INSPECTION (CEI) SERVICES. WHEREAS, the resurfacing 49th Street/Lindsay Road from 58th Avenue/CR-613 to 31st Avenue is an Indian River County priority project; and WHEREAS, the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) is prepared to provide funds to pay a portion of the cost for resurfacing of 49th Street/Lindsay Road from 58th Avenue/CR-613 to 31st Avenue, curb and gutter, guardrail upgrades, sodding, and installation of thermoplastic pavement markings under the Small County Outreach Program (SCOP); and WHEREAS, the Indian River County Board of County Commissioners is responsible for paying $277,516.00 of the estimated cost of the project costs as its portion of the required local match. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that the Chairman of the Board is hereby authorized to make, execute, and deliver to the State of Florida, Department of Transportation, a Small County Outreach Program Agreement for the aforementioned project. The foregoing resolution was offered by Commissioner who moved its adoption. The motion was seconded by Commissioner and, upon being put to a vote, the vote was as follows: Chairman Bob Solari Vice -Chairman Susan Adams Commissioner Peter D. O'Bryan Commissioner Joseph E. Flescher Commissioner Tim Zorc The Chairman thereupon declared the resolution passed and adopted this day of , 2019. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA By Bob Solari, Chairman Attest: Jeffrey R. Smith, Clerk of Court and Comptroller By: Deputy Clerk Approved as to Form and Legal Sufficiency William K. DeBraal, Deputy County Attorney 82 C:\Users\legistar\AppData\Local\Temp\BCL Technologies\easyPDF 8\@BCL@700E62E4\@BCL@700E62E4.doc STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION STATE -FUNDED GRANT AGREEMENT 525-010-60 PROGRAM MANAGEMENT 02/19 FPN: 436850-1-54-01 Fund: GRSC, SCOP, SCED FLAIR Category: 085576 Org Code: 5504 30 10 404 FLAIR Obj: 751000 FPN: Fund: FLAIR Category: Org Code: FLAIR Obj: FPN: Fund: FLAIR Category: Org Code: FLAIR Obj: County No:88 Contract No: Vendor No: VF596-000-679-003 THIS STATE -FUNDED GRANT AGREEMENT ("Agreement") is entered into on (This date to be entered by DOT only) by and between the State of Florida Department of Transportation, ("Department"), and INDIAN RIVER ("Recipient"). The Department and the Recipient are sometimes referred to in this Agreement as a "Party' and collectively as the "Parties". NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual benefits to be derived from joint participation on the Project, the Parties agree to the following: 1. Authority: The Department is authorized to enter into this Agreement pursuant to Sections 334.044, 334.044(7), and (select the applicable statutory authority for the program(s) below): ❑ Section 339.2817 Florida Statutes, County Incentive Grant Program (CIGP), (CSFA 55.008) El Section 339.2818 Florida Statutes, Small County Outreach Program (SCOP), (CSFA 55.009) ❑ Section 339.2816 Florida Statutes, Small County Road Assistance Program (SCRAP), (CSFA 55.016) ❑ Section 339.2819 Florida Statutes, Transportation Regional Incentive Program (TRIP), (CSFA 55.026) E Insert Legal Authority , Insert Funding Program Name , Insert CSFA Number The Recipient by Resolution or other form of official authorization, a copy of which is attached as Exhibit "E", Recipient Resolution, and made a part of this Agreement, has authorized its officers to execute this Agreement on its behalf. 2. Purpose of Agreement: The purpose of this Agreement is to provide for the Department's participation in CONSTRUCTION AND CEI (RESURFACING) OF 49TH ST/LINDSEY RD FROM 58TH AVE/CR-613 TO 31ST AVENUE, as further described in Exhibit "A", Project Description and Responsibilities, attached to and incorporated into this Agreement ("Project"); to provide Department financial assistance to the Recipient; state the terms and conditions upon which Department funds will be provided; and to set forth the manner in which the Project will be undertaken and completed. 3. Term of the Agreement, Commencement and Completion of the Project: This Agreement shall commence upon full execution by both Parties and the Recipient shall complete the Project on or before JUNE 30, 2021. If the Recipient does not complete the Project within this time period, this Agreement will expire on the last day of the scheduled completion as provided in this paragraph unless an extension of the time period is requested by the Recipient and granted in writing by the Department prior to the expiration of this Agreement. Expiration of this Agreement will be considered termination of the Project. The Recipient acknowledges that no funding for the Project will be provided by the State under this Agreement for work on the Project that is not timely completed and invoiced in accordance with the terms of this Agreement, or for work performed prior to full execution of the Agreement. Notwithstanding the expiration of the required completion date provided in this Agreement and the consequent potential unavailability of any unexpended portion of State funding to be provided under this Agreement, the Recipient shall remain obligated to complete all aspects of the Project identified in Exhibit "A" in accordance with the remaining terms of this Agreement, unless otherwise agreed by the Parties, in writing. Page 1 of 14 83 STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION STATE -FUNDED GRANT AGREEMENT 525-010-60 PROGRAM MANAGEMENT 02/19 Execution of this Agreement by both Parties shall be deemed a Notice to Proceed to the Recipient for the design phase or other non -construction phases of the Project. If the Project involves a construction phase, the Recipient shall not begin the construction phase of the Project until the Department issues a written Notice to Proceed for the construction phase. Prior to commencing the construction work described in this Agreement, the Recipient shall request a Notice to Proceed from the Department. 4. Amendments, Extensions and Assignment: This Agreement may be amended or extended upon mutual written agreement of the Parties. This Agreement shall not be assigned, transferred or otherwise encumbered by the Recipient under any circumstances without the prior written consent of the Department. 5. Termination or Suspension of Project: The Department may, by written notice to the Recipient, suspend any or all of the Department's obligations under this Agreement for the Recipient's failure to comply with applicable laws or the terms of this Agreement until such time as the event or condition resulting in such suspension has ceased or been corrected. The Department may also terminate this Agreement in whole or in part at any time the interest of the Department requires such termination. a. If the Department terminates the Agreement, the Department shall notify the Recipient of such termination in writing within thirty (30) days of the Department's determination to terminate the Agreement, with instructions as to the effective date of termination or to specify the stage of work at which the Agreement is to be terminated. b. The Parties to this Agreement may also terminate this Agreement when its continuation would not produce beneficial results commensurate with the further expenditure of funds. In this event, the Parties shall agree upon the termination conditions through mutual written agreement. c. If the Agreement is terminated before performance is completed, the Recipient shall be paid only for that work satisfactorily performed for which costs can be substantiated. Such payment, however, may not exceed an amount which is the same percentage of the contract price as the amount of work satisfactorily completed is a percentage of the total work called for by this Agreement. All work in progress on the Department right-of-way will become the property of the Department and will be turned over promptly by the Recipient. d. Upon termination of this Agreement, the Recipient shall, within thirty (30) days, refund to the Department any funds determined by the Department to have been expended in violation of this Agreement. 6. Project Cost: a. The estimated cost of the Project is $1,110,063.00. This amount is based upon the Schedule of Financial Assistance in Exhibit "B", attached and incorporated in this Agreement. The Schedule of Financial Assistance may be modified by execution of an amendment of the Agreement by the Parties. b. The Department agrees to participate in the Project cost up to the maximum amount of $832,547.00 and, additionally the Department's participation in the Project shall not exceed Th% of the total cost of the Project, and as more fully described in Exhibit "B", Schedule of Financial Assistance. The Department's participation may be increased or reduced upon a determination of the actual bid amounts of the Project by the execution of an amendment. The Recipient agrees to bear all expenses in excess of the amount of the Department's participation and any cost overruns or deficits incurred in connection with completion of the Project. c. The Department's participation in eligible Project costs is subject to, but not limited to: i. Legislative approval of the Department's appropriation request in the work program year that the Project is scheduled to be committed; ii. Approval of all plans, specifications, contracts or other obligating documents and all other terms of this Agreement; and Page 2 of 14 84 STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION STATE -FUNDED GRANT AGREEMENT 525-010-60 PROGRAM MANAGEMENT 02/19 iii. Department approval of the Project scope and budget at the time appropriation authority becomes available. 7. Compensation and Payment: a. The Department shall reimburse the Recipient for costs incurred to perform services described in the Project Description and Responsibilities in Exhibit "A", and as set forth in the Schedule of Financial Assistance in Exhibit "B". b. The Recipient shall provide quantifiable, measurable, and verifiable units of deliverables. Each deliverable must specify the required minimum level of service to be performed and the criteria for evaluating successful completion. The Project and the quantifiable, measurable, and verifiable units of deliverables are described more fully in Exhibit "A", Project Description and Responsibilities. Any changes to the deliverables shall require an amendment executed by both parties. c. Invoices shall be submitted no more often than monthly and no less than quarterly by the Recipient in detail sufficient for a proper pre -audit and post -audit, based on the quantifiable, measurable and verifiable deliverables as established in Exhibit "A". Deliverables and costs incurred must be received and approved by the Department prior to reimbursements. Requests for reimbursement by the Recipient shall include an invoice, progress report and supporting documentation for the period of services being billed that are acceptable to the Department. The Recipient shall use the format for the invoice and progress report that is approved by the Department. d. Supporting documentation must establish that the deliverables were received and accepted in writing by the Recipient and must also establish that the required minimum standards or level of service to be performed based on the criteria for evaluating successful completion as specified in Exhibit "A" has been met. All costs invoiced shall be supported by properly executed payrolls, time records, invoices, contracts or vouchers evidencing in proper detail the nature and propriety of charges as described in Attachment F — Contract Payment Requirements. e. Travel expenses are not compensable under this Agreement. f. Payment shall be made only after receipt and approval of deliverables and costs incurred unless advance payments are authorized by the Chief Financial Officer of the State of Florida under Chapters 215 and 216, Florida Statutes or the Department's Comptroller under Section 334.044(29), Florida Statutes. ❑ If this box is selected, advance payment is authorized for this Agreement and Exhibit "G", Alternative Advance Payment Financial Provisions is attached and incorporated into this Agreement. If the Department determines that the performance of the Recipient is unsatisfactory, the Department shall notify the Recipient of the deficiency to be corrected, which correction shall be made within a time -frame to be specified by the Department. The Recipient shall, within thirty (30) days after notice from the Department, provide the Department with a corrective action plan describing how the Recipient will address all issues of contract non-performance, unacceptable performance, failure to meet the minimum performance levels, deliverable deficiencies, or contract non-compliance. If the corrective action plan is unacceptable to the Department, the Recipient will not be reimbursed to the extent of the non-performance. The Recipient will not be reimbursed until the Recipient resolves the deficiency. If the deficiency is subsequently resolved, the Recipient may bill the Department for the unpaid reimbursement request(s) during the next billing period. If the Recipient is unable to resolve the deficiency, the funds shall be forfeited at the end of the Agreement's term. Recipients receiving financial assistance from the Department should be aware of the following time frames. Inspection and approval of deliverables and costs incurred shall take no longer than 20 days from the Department's receipt of the invoice. The Department has 20 days to deliver a request for payment (voucher) to the Department of Financial Services. The 20 days are measured from the latter of the date the invoice is received or the deliverables and costs incurred are received, inspected, and approved. Page 3 of 14 85 g. STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION STATE -FUNDED GRANT AGREEMENT 525-010-60 PROGRAM MANAGEMENT 02/19 If a payment is not available within 40 days, a separate interest penalty at a rate as established pursuant to Section 55.03(1), Florida Statutes, will be due and payable, in addition to the invoice amount, to the Recipient. Interest penalties of less than one (1) dollar will not be enforced unless the Recipient requests payment. Invoices that have to be returned to a Recipient because of Recipient preparation errors will result in a delay in the payment. The invoice payment requirements do not start until a properly completed invoice is provided to the Department. A Vendor Ombudsman has been established within the Department of Financial Services. The duties of this individual include acting as an advocate for Recipient who may be experiencing problems in obtaining timely payment(s) from a state agency. The Vendor Ombudsman may be contacted at (850) 413-5516. The Recipient shall maintain an accounting system or separate accounts to ensure funds and projects are tracked separately. Records of costs incurred under the terms of this Agreement shall be maintained and made available upon request to the Department at all times during the period of this Agreement and for five years after final payment is made. Copies of these documents and records shall be furnished to the Department upon request. Records of costs incurred include the Recipient's general accounting records and the project records, together with supporting documents and records, of the contractor and all subcontractors performing work on the project, and all other records of the contractor and subcontractors considered necessary by the Department for a proper audit of costs. h. Progress Reports. Upon request, the Recipient agrees to provide progress reports to the Department in the standard format used by the Department and at intervals established by the Department. The Department will be entitled at all times to be advised, at its request, as to the status of the Project and of details thereof. If, after Project completion, any claim is made by the Department resulting from an audit or for work or services performed pursuant to this Agreement, the Department may offset such amount from payments due for work or services done under any agreement which it has with the Recipient owing such amount if, upon demand, payment of the amount is not made within 60 days to the Department. Offsetting any amount pursuant to this paragraph shall not be considered a breach of contract by the Department. The Recipient must submit the final invoice on the Project to the Department within 120 days after the completion of the Project. Invoices submitted after the 120 -day time period may not be paid. k. The Department's performance and obligation to pay under this Agreement is contingent upon an annual appropriation by the Legislature. If the Department's financial assistance for this Project is in multiple fiscal years, a notice of availability of funds from the Department's project manager must be received prior to costs being incurred by the Recipient. See Exhibit "B" for funding levels by fiscal year. Project costs utilizing any fiscal year funds are not eligible for reimbursement if incurred prior to funds approval being received. The Department will notify the Recipient, in writing, when funds are available. I. In the event this Agreement is in excess of $25,000 and has a term for a period of more than one year, the provisions of Section 339.135(6)(a), Florida Statutes, are hereby incorporated: "The Department, during any fiscal year, shall not expend money, incur any liability, or enter into any contract which, by its terms, involves the expenditure of money in excess of the amounts budgeted as available for expenditure during such fiscal year. Any contract, verbal or written, made in violation of this subsection is null and void, and no money may be paid on such contract. The Department shall require a statement from the comptroller of the Department that funds are available prior to entering into any such contract or other binding commitment of funds. Nothing herein contained shall prevent the making of contracts for periods exceeding 1 year, but any contract so made shall be executory only for the value of the services to be rendered or agreed to be paid for in succeeding fiscal years, and this paragraph shall be incorporated verbatim in all contracts of the Department which are for an amount in excess of $25,000 and which have a term for a period of more than 1 year." Page 4 of 14 86 STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION STATE -FUNDED GRANT AGREEMENT 525-010-60 PROGRAM MANAGEMENT 02/19 m. Any Project funds made available by the Department pursuant to this Agreement which are determined by the Department to have been expended by the Recipient in violation of this Agreement or any other applicable law or regulation, shall be promptly refunded in full to the Department. Acceptance by the Department of any documentation or certifications, mandatory or otherwise permitted, that the Recipient files shall not constitute a waiver of the Department's rights as the funding agency to verify all information at a later date by audit or investigation. n. In determining the amount of the payment, the Department will exclude all Project costs incurred by the Recipient prior to theexecution of this Agreement, costs incurred prior to issuance of a Notice to Proceed, costs incurred after the expiration of the Agreement, costs which are not provided for in the latest approved Schedule of Financial Assistance in Exhibit "B" for the Project, costs agreed to be borne by the Recipient or its contractors and subcontractors for not meeting the Project commencement and final invoice time lines, and costs attributable to goods or services received under a contract or other arrangements which have not been approved in writing by the Department. 8. General Requirements: The Recipient shall complete the Project with all practical dispatch in a sound, economical, and efficient manner, and in accordance with the provisions in this Agreement and all applicable laws. a. The Recipient must obtain written approval from the Department prior to performing itself (through the efforts of its own employees) any aspect of the Project that will be funded under this Agreement. ❑ If this box is checked, then the Agency is permitted to utilize its own forces and the following provision applies: Use of Agency Workforce. In the event the Agency proceeds with any phase of the Project utilizing its own forces, the Agency will only be reimbursed for direct costs (this excludes general overhead). b. The Recipient shall provide to the Department certification and a copy of appropriate documentation substantiating that all required right-of-way necessary for the Project has been obtained. Certification is required prior to authorization for advertisement for or solicitation of bids for construction of the Project, including if no right-of-way is required. c. The Recipient shall comply and require its contractors and subcontractors to comply with all terms and conditions of this Agreement and all federal, state, and local laws and regulations applicable to this Project. d. The Recipient shall have the sole responsibility for resolving claims and requests for additional work for the Project by the Recipient's contractors and consultants. No funds will be provided for payment of claims or additional work on the Project under this Agreement without the prior written approval of the claim or request for additional work by Department. 9. Contracts of the Recipient a. The Department has the right to review and approve any and all third party contracts with respect to the Project before the Recipient executes any contract or obligates itself in any manner requiring the disbursement of Department funds under this Agreement, including consultant or construction contracts or amendments thereto. If the Department exercises this right and the Recipient fails to obtain such approval, the Department may deny payment to the Recipient. The Department may review the qualifications of any consultant or contractor and to approve or disapprove the employment of such consultant or contractor. b. It is understood and agreed by the parties hereto that participation by the Department in a project that involves the purchase of commodities or contractual services or the purchasing of capital equipment or the equipping of facilities, where purchases or costs exceed the Threshold Amount for CATEGORY TWO per Chapter 287.017 Florida Statutes, is contingent on the Recipient complying in full with the provisions of Chapter _287.057 Florida Statutes The Recipient shall certify to the Department that the purchase of commodities or contractual services has been accomplished in compliance with Chapter 287.057 Florida Statutes It shall be the sole responsibility of the Recipient to ensure that any obligations made in accordance with this Section comply with the current threshold limits. Contracts, purchase orders, task orders, Page 5 of 14 87 STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION STATE -FUNDED GRANT AGREEMENT 525-010-60 PROGRAM MANAGEMENT 02/19 construction change orders, or any other agreement that would result in exceeding the current budget contained in Exhibit "B", or that are not consistent with the Project description and scope of services contained in Exhibit "A" must be approved by the Department prior to Recipient execution. Failure to obtain such approval, and subsequent execution of an amendment to the Agreement if required, shall be sufficient cause for nonpayment by the Department. c. Participation by the Department in a project that involves a consultant contract for engineering, architecture or surveying services, is contingent on the Recipient's complying in full with provisions of Section 287.055, Florida Statutes, Consultants' Competitive Negotiation Act. In all cases, the Recipient shall certify to the Department that selection has been accomplished in compliance with the Consultants' Competitive Negotiation Act. d. If the Project is procured pursuant to Chapter 255 for construction services and at the time of the competitive solicitation for the Project 50 percent or more of the cost of the Project is to be paid from state -appropriated funds, then the Recipient must comply with the requirements of Section 255.0991, Florida Statutes. 10. Design and Construction Standards and Required Approvals: In the event the Project includes construction the following provisions are incorporated into this Agreement: a. The Recipient is responsible for obtaining all permits necessary for the Project. b. In the event the Project involves construction on the Department's right-of-way, the Recipient shall provide the Department with written notification of either its intent to: i. Award the construction of the Project to a Department prequalified contractor which is the lowest and best bidder in accordance with applicable state and federal statutes, rules, and regulations. The Recipient shall then submit a copy of the bid tally sheet(s) and awarded bid contract, or ii. Construct the Project utilizing existing Recipient employees, if the Recipient can complete said Project within the time frame set forth in this Agreement. The Recipient's use of this option is subject to approval by the Department. c. The Recipient shall hire a qualified contractor using the Recipient's normal bid procedures to perform the construction work for the Project. For projects that are not located on the Department's right-of-way, the Recipient is not required to hire a contractor prequalified by the Department unless the Department notifies the Recipient prior to letting that they are required to hire a contractor prequalified by the Department. d. The Recipient is responsible for provision of Construction Engineering Inspection (CEI) services. The Department reserves the right to require the Recipient to hire a Department pre -qualified consultant firm that includes one individual that has completed the Advanced Maintenance of Traffic Level Training. Administration of the CEI staff shall be under the responsible charge of a State of Florida Licensed Professional Engineer who shall provide the certification that all design and construction for the Project meets the minimum construction standards established by Department. The Department shall have the right to approve the CEI firm. The Department shall have the right, but not the obligation, to perform independent assurance testing during the course of construction of the Project. Subject to the approval of the Department, the Recipient may choose to satisfy the requirements set forth in this paragraph by either hiring a Department prequalified consultant firm or utilizing Recipient staff that meet the requirements of this paragraph, or a combination thereof. e. The Recipient is responsible for the preparation of all design plans for the Project. The Department reserves the right to require the Recipient to hire a Department pre -qualified consultant for the design phase of the Project using the Recipient's normal procurement procedures to perform the design services for the Project. All design work on the Project shall be performed in accordance with the requirements of all applicable laws and governmental rules and regulations and federal and state accepted design standards for the type of construction contemplated by the Project, including, as applicable, but not limited to, the applicable provisions of the Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) and the AASHTO Policy on Geometric Design of Streets and Highways. All design work for any portion of the Project to be located on Page 6of14 88 STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION STATE -FUNDED GRANT AGREEMENT 525-010-60 PROGRAM MANAGEMENT 02/19 Department right-of-way shall conform to all applicable standards of the Department, as provided in Exhibit "F", Terms and Conditions of Construction, which is attached to and incorporated into this Agreement if a portion of the Project will be located on FDOT's right of way. f. The Recipient shall adhere to the Department's Conflict of Interest Procedure (FDOT Topic No. 375-030- 006) or Conflict of Interest Procedure for State Funded Grant Programs (FDOT Topic No. 750-000-002). The Recipient will provide copies of the final design plans and specifications and final bid documents to the Department's Construction Project Manager prior to commencing construction of the Project. The Department will specify the number of copies required and the required format. 9. h. The Recipient shall require the Recipient's contractor to post a payment and performance bond in accordance with applicable law. i. The Recipient shall be responsible to ensure that the construction work under this Agreement is performed in accordance with the approved construction documents, and that it will meet all applicable Recipient and Department standards. J. Upon completion of the work authorized by this Agreement, the Recipient shall notify the Department in writing of the completion of construction of the Project; and for all design work that originally required certification by a Professional Engineer, this notification shall contain an Engineers Certification of Compliance, signed and sealed by a Professional Engineer, the form of which is attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit "C", Engineers Certification of Completion. The certification shall state that work has been completed in compliance with the Project construction plans and specifications. If any deviations are found from the approved plans, the certification shall include a list of all deviations along with an explanation that justifies the reason to accept each deviation. k. The Recipient shall provide the Department with as -built plans of any portions of the Project funded through the Agreement prior to final inspection. 11. Maintenance Obligations: In the event the Project includes construction then the following provisions are incorporated into this Agreement: a. The Recipient agrees to maintain any portion of the Project not located on the State Highway System constructed under this Agreement for its useful life. If the Recipient constructs any improvement on Department right-of-way, the Recipient ❑ shall ® shall not maintain the improvements located on the Department right-of-way made for their useful life. If the Recipient is required to maintain Project improvements located on the Department right-of-way beyond final acceptance, then Recipient shall, prior to any disbursement of the State funding provided under this Agreement, also execute a Maintenance Memorandum of Agreement in a form that is acceptable to the Department. The Recipient has agreed to the foregoing by resolution, and such resolution is attached and incorporated into this Agreement as Exhibit "E". This provision will survive termination of this Agreement. 12. State Single Audit: The administration of resources awarded through the Department to the Recipient by this Agreement may be subject to audits and/or monitoring by the Department. The following requirements do not limit the authority of the Department to conduct or arrange for the conduct of additional audits or evaluations of state financial assistance or limit the authority of any state agency inspector general, the Auditor General, or any other state official. The Recipient shall comply with all audit and audit reporting requirements as specified below. a. In addition to reviews of audits conducted in accordance with Section 215.97, Florida Statutes, monitoring procedures to monitor the Recipient's use of state financial assistance may include but not be limited to on- site visits by Department staff and/or other procedures including, reviewing any required performance and financial reports, following up, ensuring corrective action, and issuing management decisions on weaknesses found through audits when those findings pertain to state financial assistance awarded through Page 7 of 14 89 STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION STATE -FUNDED GRANT AGREEMENT 525-010-60 PROGRAM MANAGEMENT 02/19 the Department by this Agreement. By entering into this Agreement, the Recipient agrees to comply and cooperate fully with any monitoring procedures/processes deemed appropriate by the Department. The Recipient further agrees to comply and cooperate with any inspections, reviews, investigations, or audits deemed necessary by the Department, the Department of Financial Services (DFS) or the Auditor General. b. The Recipient, a nonstate entity as defined by Section 215.97(2)(n), Florida Statutes, as a recipient of state financial assistance awarded by the Department through this Agreement is subject to the following requirements: i. In the event the Recipient meets the audit threshold requirements established by Section 215.97, Florida Statutes, the Recipient must have a State single or project -specific audit conducted for such fiscal year in accordance with Section 215.97, Florida Statutes; applicable rules of the Department of Financial Services; and Chapters 10.550 (local governmental entities) or 10.650 (nonprofit and for-profit organizations), Rules of the Auditor General. Exhibit "D" to this Agreement indicates state financial assistance awarded through the Department by this Agreement needed by the Recipient to further comply with the requirements of Section 215.97, Florida Statutes. In determining the state financial assistance expended in a fiscal year, the Recipient shall consider all sources of state financial assistance, including state financial assistance received from the Department by this Agreement, other state agencies and other nonstate entities. State financial assistance does not include Federal direct or pass-through awards and resources received by a nonstate entity for Federal program matching requirements. ii. In connection with the audit requirements, the Recipient shall ensure that the audit complies with the requirements of Section 215.97(8), Florida Statutes. This includes submission of a financial reporting package as defined by Section 215.97(2)(e), Florida Statutes, and Chapters 10.550 (local governmental entities) or 10.650 (nonprofit and for-profit organizations), Rules of the Auditor General. iii. In the event the Recipient does not meet the audit threshold requirements established by Section 215.97, Florida Statutes, the Recipient is exempt for such fiscal year from the state single audit requirements of Section 215.97, Florida Statutes. However, the Recipient must provide a single audit exemption statement to the Department at FDOTSingleAudit@dot.state.fl.us no later than nine months after the end of the Recipient's audit period for each applicable audit year. In the event the Recipient does not meet the audit threshold requirements established by Section 215.97, Florida Statutes, in a fiscal year and elects to have an audit conducted in accordance with the provisions of Section 215.97, Florida Statutes, the cost of the audit must be paid from the Recipient's resources (i.e., the cost of such an audit must be paid from the Recipient's resources obtained from other than State entities). iv. In accordance with Chapters 10.550 (local governmental entities) or 10.650 (nonprofit and for-profit organizations), Rules of the Auditor General, copies of financial reporting packages required by this Agreement shall be submitted to: Florida Department of Transportation Office of Comptroller, MS 24 605 Suwannee Street Tallahassee, FL 32399-0405 Email: FDOTSincileAuditna dot.state.fl.us And State of Florida Auditor General Local Government Audits/342 111 West Madison Street, Room 401 Tallahassee, FL 32399-1450 Email: flaudgen localgovt a(�,aud.state.fl.us Page 8 of 14 90 • STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION STATE -FUNDED GRANT AGREEMENT 525-010-60 PROGRAM MANAGEMENT 02/19 v. Any copies of financial reporting packages, reports or other information required to be submitted to the Department shall be submitted timely in accordance with Section 215.97, Florida Statutes, and Chapters 10.550 (local governmental entities) or 10.650 (nonprofit and for-profit organizations), Rules of the Auditor General, as applicable. vi. The Recipient, when submitting financial reporting packages to the Department for audits done in accordance with Chapters 10.550 (local governmental entities) or 10.650 (nonprofit and for-profit organizations), Rules of the Auditor General, should indicate the date the reporting package was delivered to the Recipient in correspondence accompanying the reporting package. vii. Upon receipt, and within six months, the Department will review the Recipient's financial reporting package, including corrective action plans and management letters, to the extent necessary to determine whether timely land appropriate corrective action on all deficiencies has been taken pertaining to the state financial assistance provided through the Department by this Agreement. If the Recipient fails to have an audit conducted consistent with Section 215.97, Florida Statutes, the Department may take appropriate corrective action to enforce compliance. viii. As a condition of receiving state financial assistance, the Recipient shall permit the Department, or its designee, DFS or the Auditor General access to the Recipient's records including financial statements, the independent auditor's working papers and project records as necessary. Records related to unresolved audit findings, appeals or litigation shall be retained until the action is complete or the dispute is resolved. c. The Recipient shall retain sufficient records demonstrating its compliance with the terms of this Agreement for a period of five years from the date the audit report is issued and shall allow the Department, or its designee, DFS or the Auditor General access to such records upon request. The Recipient shall ensure that the audit working papers are made available to the Department, or its designee, DFS or the Auditor General upon request for a period of five years from the date the audit report is issued unless extended in writing by the Department. 13. Restrictions, Prohibitions, Controls and Labor Provisions: a. A person or affiliate who has been placed on the convicted vendor list following a conviction for a public entity crime may not submit a bid on a contract to provide any goods or services to a public entity; may not submit a bid on a contract with a public entity for the construction or repair of a public building or public work; may not submit bids on leases of real property to a public entity; may not be awarded or perform work as a contractor, supplier, subcontractor or consultant under a contract with any public entity; and may not transact business with any public entity in excess of the threshold amount provided in Section 287.017, Florida Statutes, for CATEGORY TWO for a period of 36 months from the date of being placed on the convicted vendor list. b. In accordance with Section 287.134, Florida Statutes, an entity or affiliate who has been placed on the Discriminatory Vendor List, kept by the Florida Department of Management Services, may not submit a bid on a contract to provide goods or services to a public entity; may not submit a bid on a contract with a public entity for the construction or repair of a public building or public work; may not submit bids on leases of real property to a public entity; may not be awarded or perform work as a contractor, supplier, subcontractor or consultant under a contract with any public entity; and may not transact business with any public entity. c. An entity or affiliate who has had its Certificate of Qualification suspended, revoked, denied or have further been determined by the Department to be a non -responsible contractor may not submit a bid or perform work for the construction or repair of a public building or public work on a contract with the Recipient. d. No funds received pursuant to this Agreement may be expended for lobbying the Florida Legislature, judicial branch, or any state agency, in accordance with Section 216.347, Florida Statutes. e. The Department shall consider the employment by any contractor of unauthorized aliens a violation of Section 274A(e) of the Immigration and Nationality Act. If the contractor knowingly employs unauthorized aliens, such violation will be cause for unilateral cancellation of this Agreement. Page 9 of 14 91 STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION STATE -FUNDED GRANT AGREEMENT f. The Recipient shall: 525-010-60 PROGRAM MANAGEMENT 02/19 i. Utilize the U.S. Department of Homeland Security's E -Verify system to verify the employment eligibility of all new employees hired by the Recipient during the term of the contract; and ii. Expressly require any subcontractors performing work or providing services pursuant to the state contract to likewise utilize the U.S. Department of Homeland Security's E -Verify system to verify the employment eligibility of all new employees hired by the subcontractor during the contract term. g. The Recipient shall comply and require its contractors and subcontractors to comply with all terms and conditions of this Agreement and all federal, state, and local laws and regulations applicable to this Project. 14. Indemnification and Insurance: a. It is specifically agreed between the parties executing this Agreement that it is not intended by any of the provisions of any part of this Agreement to create in the public or any member thereof, a third -party beneficiary under this Agreement, or to authorize anyone not a party to this Agreement to maintain a suit for personal injuries or property damage pursuant to the terms or provisions of this Agreement. The Recipient guarantees the payment of all just claims for materials, supplies, tools, or labor and other just claims against the Recipient or any subcontractor, in connection with this - Agreement. b. To the extent provided by law, Recipient shall indemnify, defend, and hold harmless the Department against any actions, claims, or damages arising out of, relating to, or resulting from negligent or wrongful act(s) of Recipient, or any of its officers, agents, or employees, acting within the scope of their office or employment, in connection with the rights granted to or exercised by Recipient hereunder, to the extent and within the limitations of Section 768.28, Florida Statutes. The foregoing indemnification shall not constitute a waiver of sovereign immunity beyond the limits set forth in Florida Statutes, Section 768.28, nor shall the same be construed to constitute agreement by Recipient to indemnify the Department for the negligent acts or omissions of the Department, its officers, agents, or employees, or for the acts of third parties. Nothing herein shall be construed as consent by Recipient to be sued by third parties in any manner arising out of this Agreement. This indemnification shall survive the termination of this Agreement. c. Recipient agrees to include the following indemnification in all contracts with contractors, subcontractors, consultants, or subconsultants (each referred to as "Entity" for the purposes of the below indemnification) who perform work in connection with this Agreement: "To the extent provided by law, [ENTITY] shall indemnify, defend, and hold harmless the [RECIPIENT] and the State of Florida, Department of Transportation, including the Department's officers, agents, and employees, against any actions, claims, or damages arising out of, relating to, or resulting from negligent or wrongful act(s) of [ENTITY], or any of its officers, agents, or employees, acting within the scope of their office or employment, in connection with the rights granted to or exercised by [ENTITY] hereunder, to the extent and within the limitations of Section 768.28, Florida Statutes. The foregoing indemnification shall not constitute a waiver of sovereign immunity beyond the limits set forth in Florida Statutes, Section 768.28. Nor shall the same be construed to constitute agreement by [ENTITY] to indemnify [RECIPIENT] for the negligent acts or omissions of [RECIPIENT], its officers, agents, or employees, or third parties. Nor shall the same be construed to constitute agreement by [ENTITY] to indemnify the Department for the negligent acts or omissions of the Department, its officers, agents, or employees, or third parties. This indemnification shall survive the termination of this Agreement." d. The Recipient shall provide Workers' Compensation Insurance in accordance with Florida's Workers' Compensation law for all employees. If subletting any of the work, ensure that the subcontractor(s) and subconsultants have Workers' Compensation Insurance for their employees in accordance with Florida's Page 10 of 14 92 STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION STATE -FUNDED GRANT AGREEMENT 525-010-60 PROGRAM MANAGEMENT 02/19 Workers' Compensation law. If using "leased employees" or employees obtained through professional employer organizations ("PEO's"), ensure that such employees are covered by Workers' Compensation insurance through the PEO's or other leasing entities. Ensure that any equipment rental agreements that include operators or other personnel who are employees of independent contractors, sole proprietorships or partners are covered by insurance required under Florida's Workers' Compensation law. e. If the Recipient elects to self -perform the Project, and such self -performance is approved by the Department in accordance with the terms of this Agreement, the Recipient may self -insure and proof of self-insurance shall be provided to the Department. If the Recipient elects to hire a contractor or consultant to perform the Project, then the Recipient shall, or cause its contractor or consultant to carry Commercial General Liability insurance providing continuous coverage for all work or operations performed under the Agreement. Such insurance shall be no more restrictive than that provided by the latest occurrence form edition of the standard Commercial General Liability Coverage Form (ISO Form CG 00 01) as filed for use in the State of Florida. Recipient shall, or cause its contractor to cause the Department to be made an Additional Insured as to such insurance. Such coverage shall be on an "occurrence" basis and shall include Products/Completed Operations coverage. The coverage afforded to the Department as an Additional Insured shall be primary as to any other available insurance and shall not be more restrictive than the coverage afforded to the Named Insured. The limits of coverage shall not be less than $1,000,000 for each occurrence and not Tess than a $5,000,000 annual general aggregate, inclusive of amounts provided by an umbrella or excess policy. The limits of coverage described herein shall apply fully to the work or operations performed under the Agreement, and may not be shared with or diminished by claims unrelated to the Agreement. The policy/ies and coverage described herein may be subject to a deductible and such deductibles shall be paid by the Named Insured. No policy/ies or coverage described herein may contain or be subject to a Retention or a Self -Insured Retention unless the Recipient is a state agency or subdivision of the State of Florida that elects to self -perform the Project. Prior to the execution of the Agreement, and at all renewal periods which occur prior to final acceptance of the work, the Department shall be provided with an ACORD Certificate of Liability Insurance reflecting the coverage described herein. The Department shall be notified in writing within ten days of any cancellation, notice of cancellation, lapse, renewal, or proposed change to any policy or coverage described herein. The Department's approval or failure to disapprove any policy/ies, coverage, or ACORD Certificates shall not relieve or excuse any obligation to procure and maintain the insurance required herein, nor serve as a waiver of any rights or defenses the Department may have. f. When the Agreement includes the construction of a railroad grade crossing, railroad overpass or underpass structure, or any other work or operations within the limits of the railroad right-of-way, including any encroachments thereon from work or operations in the vicinity of the railroad right-of-way, the Recipient shall, or cause its contractor to, in addition to the insurance coverage required above, procure and maintain Railroad Protective Liability Coverage (ISO Form CG 00 35) where the railroad is the Named Insured and where the limits are not less than $2,000,000 combined single limit for bodily injury and/or property damage per occurrence, and with an annual aggregate limit of not less than $6,000,000. The railroad shall also be added along with the Department as an Additional Insured on the policy/ies procured pursuant to the paragraph above. Prior to the execution of the Agreement, and at all renewal periods which occur prior to final acceptance of the work, both the Department and the railroad shall be provided with an ACORD Certificate of Liability Insurance reflecting the coverage described herein. The insurance described herein shall be maintained through final acceptance of the work. Both the Department and the railroad shall be notified in writing within ten days of any cancellation, notice of cancellation, renewal, or proposed change to any policy or coverage described herein. The Department's approval or failure to disapprove any policy/ies, coverage, or ACORD Certificates shall not relieve or excuse any obligation to procure and maintain the insurance required herein, nor serve as a waiver of any rights the Department may have. g. When the Agreement involves work on or in the vicinity of utility -owned property or facilities, the utility shall be added along with the Department as an Additional Insured on the Commercial General Liability policy/ies procured above. 15. Miscellaneous: a. In no event shall any payment to the Recipient constitute or be construed as a waiver by the Department of any breach of covenant or any default which may then exist on the part of the Recipient and the making Page 11 of 14 93 STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION STATE -FUNDED GRANT AGREEMENT 525-010-60 PROGRAM MANAGEMENT 02/19 of such payment by the Department, while any such breach or default shall exist, shall in no way impair or prejudice any right or remedy available to the Department with respect to such breach or default. b. If any provision of this Agreement is held invalid, the remainder of this Agreement shall not be affected. In such an instance, the remainder would then continue to conform to the terms and requirements of applicable law. c. The Recipient and the Department agree that the Recipient, its employees, contractors, subcontractors, consultants, and subconsultants are not agents of the Department as a result of this Agreement. d. By execution of the Agreement, the Recipient represents that it has not paid and, also agrees not to pay, any bonus or commission for the purpose of obtaining an approval of its application for the financing hereunder. e. Nothing in the Agreement shall require the Recipient to observe or enforce compliance with any provision or perform any act or do any other thing in contravention of any applicable state law. If any of the provisions of the Agreement violate any applicable state law, the Recipient will at once notify the Department in writing in order that appropriate changes and modifications may be made by the Department and the Recipient to the end that the Recipient may proceed as soon as possible with the Project. f. This Agreement may be executed in one or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which shall constitute the same Agreement. A facsimile or electronic transmission of this Agreement with a signature on behalf of a party will be legal and binding on such party. g. The Department reserves the right to unilaterally terminate this Agreement for failure by the Recipient to comply with the provisions of Chapter 119, Florida Statutes. h. The Recipient agrees to comply with Section 20.055(5), Florida Statutes, and to incorporate in all subcontracts the obligation to comply with Section 20.055(5), Florida Statutes J• This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Florida. In the event of a conflict between any portion of the contract and Florida law, the laws of Florida shall prevail. The Recipient agrees to waive forum and venue and that the Department shall determine the forum and venue in which any dispute under this Agreement is decided. This Agreement does not involve the purchase of Tangible Personal Property, as defined in Chapter 273, Florida Statutes. 16. Exhibits. a. Exhibits A, B, D, and E, and Attachment F are attached to and incorporated into this Agreement. b. ® The Project will involve construction, therefore, Exhibit "C", Engineer's Certification of Compliance is attached and incorporated into this Agreement. c. ❑ A portion or all of the Project will utilize the Department's right-of-way and, therefore, Exhibit F, Terms and Conditions of Construction in Department Right -of -Way, is attached and incorporated into this Agreement. d. ❑ The following Exhibit(s), in addition to those listed in 16.a. and 16.b., are attached and incorporated into this Agreement: e. Exhibit and Attachment List Exhibit A: Project Description and Responsibilities Exhibit B: Schedule of Financial Assistance *Exhibit C: Engineer's Certification of Compliance Page 12 of 14 94 STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION STATE -FUNDED GRANT AGREEMENT Exhibit D: State Financial Assistance (Florida Single Audit Act) Exhibit E: Recipient Resolution *Exhibit F: Terms and Conditions of Construction in Department Right -of -Way *Exhibit G: Alternative Pay Method Attachment F — Contract Payment Requirements *Additional Exhibit(s): 525-010-60 PROGRAM MANAGEMENT 02/19 *Indicates that the Exhibit is only attached and incorporated if applicable box is selected. The remainder of this page intentionally left blank. Page 13 of 14 95 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement on the date(s) below. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS STATE OF FLORIDA INDIAN RIVER COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (Name of RECIPIENT) BY: BY: TITLE: CHAIRMAN TITLE: DIRECTOR OF TRANSP. DEVELOPMENT Print Name: BOB SOLARI Print Name: STACY L. MILLER, P.E, Date: Date: OFFICE OF THE GENERAL COUNSEL ATTEST: LEGAL REVIEW: Jeffrey R. Smith, Clerk of Court & Comptroller By: , Deputy Clerk See attached encumbrance form for date of Funding approval by Comptroller. APPROVED AS TO FORM & LEGAL SUFFICIENCY: Recipient's LEGAL REVIEW: Print Name: WILLIAM K. DEBRAAL DEPUTY COUNTY ATTORNEY Page 14 of 14 96 STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION STATE -FUNDED GRANT AGREEMENT EXHIBIT "A" PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND RESPONSIBILITIES FPN: 436850-1-54-01 525-010-60 PROGRAM MANAGEMENT 09/17 Page 1 of 1 This exhibit forms an integral part of the State -Funded Grant Agreement between the State of Florida, Department of Transportation and INDIAN RIVER COUNTY (the Recipient) PROJECT LOCATION: ❑ The project is on the National Highway System. ❑ The project is on the State Highway System. PROJECT LENGTH AND MILE POST LIMITS: 1.748 MILES, 49TH STREET FROM 58TH AVE. TO 31ST AVE. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: RESURFACING 49TH STREET (LINDSEY RD) FROM 58TH AVE. (CR -613) TO 31ST AVE. The proposed improvement will include Construction and CEI, milling of existing pavement, installation of superpave asphaltic, sodding and installation of thermoplastic pavement markings. SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS BY RECIPIENT: The Agency is required to provide a .copy of the design plans for the Department's review and approval to coordinate permitting with the Department, and notify the Department prior to commencement of any right-of-way activities. The Recipient shall commence the project's activities subsequent to the execution of this Agreement and shall perform in accordance with the following schedule: a) Construction to be completed by November 30, 2020. If this schedule cannot be met, the Recipient will notify the Department in writing with a revised schedule or the project is subject to the withdrawal of funding. SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS BY DEPARTMENT: 97 Florida Statues: 334-044(7) EXHIBIT A SCOPE OF WORK & DELIVERABLES 49TH Street (LINDSEY ROAD) from 58th AVENUE (CR -613) to 31st AVENUE FM# 436850-1-54-01 This Project will be performed for resurfacing 49th Street from 58th Avenue to 31st Avenue. The proposed improvements will include but no limited to construction and CEI, milling and existing pavement, installation of superpave asphaltic concrete, sodding and installation of thermoplastic pavement markings. 98 EXHIBIT A DELIVERABLES FM# 436850-1-54-01 Item No.Description Unit Estimated QtY 101-1 MOBILIZATION LS 1 102-1 MAINTENANCE OF TRAFFIC LS 1 104-1 EROSION AND WATER POLLUTION CONTROL LS 1 110-1-1 CLEARING AND GRUBBING LS 1 120-1 REGULAR EXCAVATION LS 1 120-6 EMBANKMENT (COMPACTED IN PLACE) CY 1458 160-4 TYPE B STABILIZATION 12" SHOULDER (LBR-40) SY 2554 285-709 OPTIONAL BASE GROUP 9 (10" LIMEROCK) LBR-100 TWO LIFTS SY 1893 327-70-6 MILL EXISTING ASPHALT PAVEMENT 1 1/2" AVERAGE DEPTH SY 32019 334-1-53 TYPE SP -12.5 ASPHALTIC CONCRETE (1-1/2" THK) (WIDENING) TRAFFIC C, PG 76- 22 SY 1089 334-1-53A SP -12.5 ASPHALTIC CONCRETE (0" to 3" THK) (OVERBUILD) (TRAFFIC C, PG 76- 22) SY 10955 337-7-83 FRICTION COURSE TYPE F.C. 12.5 (PG 76-22, PMA) (1-1/2" THK) TRAFFIC C SY 33108 520-1-10 CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER (TYPE F) LF 4917 522-2 CONCRETE SIDEWALK AND DRIVEWAYS SY 38 527-2 DETECTABLE WARNING SF 32 536-1-1 GUARDRAIL - ROADWAY GENERAL TL -3 LF 350 536-85-26 GUARDRAIL -END TREATMENT TYPE CRT EA 4 570-1-2 PERFORMANCE TURF - SODDING (BAHIA) SY 10133 700-1-50 SINGLE POST SIGN (RELOCATE) AS 6 700-1-11 SINGLE POST SIGN (BIKE ROUTE) AS 5 706-3 RPM (BI-DIRECTIONAL (AMBER/AMBER) EA 602 711-4 BICYCLE LANE MARKING, THERMOPLASTIC (WHITE) EA 21 711-11-125 THERMOPLASTIC, TRAFFIC STRIPE, WHTTE,SOLID,24" LF 151 711-11-141 THERMOPLASTIC,TRAFFIC STRIPE,WHITE,SKIP,6" (2'-4') GM 0.165 711-11-141 THERMOPLASTIC,TRAFFIC STRIPE,WHITE,SKIP,6" (6'-10') GM 0.146 711-11-170 THERMOPLASTIC, STANDARD, WHITE, ARROW EA 18 711-11-224 THERMOPLASTIC,TRAFFIC STRIPE,YELLOW,SOLID,18" LF 651 711-11-241 THERMOPLASTIC,TRAFFIC STRIPE,YELLOW,SKIP,6" (6 '-10') GM 0.027 711-16-101 THERMOPLASTIC,TRAFFIC STRIPE, WHITE,SOLID,6" GM 3.115 711-16-201 THERMOPLASTIC,TRAFFIC STRIPE,YELLOW,SOLID,6" GM 3.531 CEI CLASSIFICATIONS Sr. Project Engineer Project Administrator Sr. Inspector Inspector Inspector AIDE Quality Control (QC) Manager Earthwork Construction Inspector Level 1 Earthwork Construction Inspector Level 2 Asphalt Paving Technician Level 1 Asphalt Paving Technician Level 2 99 STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION STATE -FUNDED GRANT AGREEMENT EXHIBIT "B" SCHEDULE OF FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE 525-010-60 PROGRAM MANAGEMENT 09/17 Page 1 of 2 RECIPIENT NAME & BILLING ADDRESS: INDIAN RIVER COUNTY 1801 27TH STREET VERO BEACH, FL 32960 FINANCIAL PROJECT NUMBER: 436850-1-54-01 I. PHASE OF WORK by Fiscal Year: FY 2019 FY2020 FY2021 TOTAL Design- Phase 34 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $0.00 Maximum Department Participation - (Insert Program Name) % or $ % or $ cro or $ % or $ 0.00 Maximum Department Participation - (Insert Program Name) % or $ % or $ % or $ % or $ 0.00 Maximum Department Participation - (Insert Program Name) or $ or $ or $ % or $ 0.00 Local Participation (Any applicable waiver noted in Exhibit "A") or $ 0.00 or $ 0.00 or $ 0.00 or $0.00 In -Kind Contribution $ $ $ $ 0.00 Cash $ $ $ $ 0.00 Combination In-Kind/Cash $ $ $ $ 0.00 Right of Way- Phase 44 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $0.00 Maximum Department Participation - (Insert Program Name) % or $ or $ or $ or $ 0.00 Maximum Department Participation - (Insert Program Name) % or $ or $ or $ or $ 0.00 Maximum Department Participation - (Insert Program Name) or $ or $ % or $ ok or $0.00 Local Participation (Any applicable waiver noted in Exhibit "A") % or $ 0.00 or $ 0.00 or $ 0.00 or $0.00 In -Kind Contribution $ $ $ $ 0.00 Cash $ $ 0.00 $ $ 0.00 Combination In-Kind/Cash $ $ $ $ 0.00 Construction/CEI - Phase 54 $ 453,331.00 $ 656,733.00 $ 0.00 $1,110,064.00 Maximum Department Participation - (SMALL COUNTY 75% 75% or or $ 339,998.00 $ 492,549.00 or or $ $ 832,547.00 OUTREACH PROGRAM) % % Maximum Department Participation - (Insert Program Name) or or $ $ % ok or or $ $ 0.00 Maximum Department Participation - (Insert Program Name) % % or or $ $ % % or or $ $ 0.00 Local Participation (Any applicable waiver noted in Exhibit "A") 25% 25% or or $ 113, 333.00 $ 164,184.00 or or $ 0.00 $277,517.00 In -Kind Contribution $ $ $ $ 0.00 Cash $ 113,333.00 $ 164,184.00 $ $ 277,517.00 Combination In-Kind/Cash $ $ $ $ 0.00 100 STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION STATE -FUNDED GRANT AGREEMENT EXHIBIT "B" SCHEDULE OF FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE 525-010-60 PROGRAM MANAGEMENT 09/17 Page 2 of 2 COST ANALYSIS CERTIFICATION AS REQUIRED BY SECTION 216.3475, FLORIDA STATUTES: I certify that the cost for each line item budget category has been evaluated and determined to be allowable, reasonable, and necessary as required by Section 216.3475, F.S. Documentation is on file evidencing the methodology used and the conclusions reached. Norma C. Corredor District Grant Manager Name Signature Date 101 Insert Phase and Number (if applicable) $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $0.00 Maximum Department Participation - (Insert Program Name) % or $ % or $ .% or $ % or $0.00 Maximum Department Participation - (Insert Program Name) % or $ % or $ % or $ % or $ 0.00 Maximum Department Participation - (Insert Program Name) % or $ % or $ % or $ % or $ 0.00 Local Participation (Any applicable waiver noted in Exhibit "A") or $ 0.00 or $ 0.00 or $ 0.00 or $0.00 In -Kind Contribution $ $ $ $ 0.00 Cash $ 1 $ $ $ 0.00 Combination In-Kind/Cash $ $ $ $ 0.00 11. TOTAL PROJECT COST: $453,331.00 $656,733.00 $0.00 $1,110,064.00 COST ANALYSIS CERTIFICATION AS REQUIRED BY SECTION 216.3475, FLORIDA STATUTES: I certify that the cost for each line item budget category has been evaluated and determined to be allowable, reasonable, and necessary as required by Section 216.3475, F.S. Documentation is on file evidencing the methodology used and the conclusions reached. Norma C. Corredor District Grant Manager Name Signature Date 101 STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION STATE -FUNDED GRANT AGREEMENT EXHIBIT "C" ENGINEER'S CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE 525-010-60 PROGRAM MANAGEMENT 09/17 Page 1 of 1 Engineer's Certification of Compliance. The Recipient shall complete and submit the following Notice of Completion and, if applicable, Engineer's Certification of Compliance to the Department upon completion of the construction phase of the Project. NOTICE OF COMPLETION STATE -FUNDED GRANT AGREEMENT Between THE STATE OF FLORIDA, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION and INDIAN RIVER COUNTY PROJECT DESCRIPTION:Construction and CEI (Milling and resurfacing) of 49th Street (LINDSEY ROAD) from 58th Ave. (CR -613) to 31St Avenue. FPID#: 436850-1-54-01 In accordance with the Terms and Conditions of the State -Funded Grant Agreement, the undersigned provides notification that the work authorized by this Agreement is complete as of , 20_. By: Name: Title: ENGINEER'S CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE In accordance with the Terms and Conditions of the State -Funded Grant Agreement, the undersigned certifies that all work which originally required certification by a Professional Engineer has been completed in compliance with the Project construction plans and specifications. If any deviations have been made from the approved plans, a list of all deviations, along with an explanation that justifies the reason to accept each deviation, will be attached to this Certification. Also, with submittal of this certification the Recipient shall furnish the Department a set of "as -built" plans certified by the Engineer of Record/CEI. SEAL: By: Name: Date: P.E 102 STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION STATE -FUNDED GRANT AGREEMENT EXHIBIT D STATE FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE (FLORIDA SINGLE AUDIT ACT) 525-010=60 PROGRAM MANAGEMENT 09/17 Page 1 of 1 THE STATE RESOURCES AWARDED PURSUANT TO THIS AGREEMENT CONSIST OF THE FOLLOWING: Awarding Agency: Florida Department of Transportation State Project Title and CSFA Number: ❑ County Incentive Grant Program (CIGP), (CSFA 55.008) ® Small County Outreach Program (SCOP), (CSFA 55.009) El Small County Road Assistance Program (SCRAP), (CSFA 55.016) ❑ Transportation Regional Incentive Program (TRIP), (CSFA 55.026) ❑ Insert Program Name, Insert CSFA Number *Award Amount: $832,547.00 *The state award amount may change with supplemental agreements Specific project information for CSFA Number is provided at: https://apps.fldfs.com/fsaa/searchCataloq.aspx COMPLIANCE REQUIREMENTS APPLICABLE TO STATE RESOURCES AWARDED PURSUANT TO THIS AGREEMENT: State Project Compliance Requirements for CSFA Number are provided at: https://apps.fldfs.com/fsaa/searchCompliance.aspx The State Projects Compliance Supplement is provided at: https://apps.fldfs.com/fsaa/compliance.aspx 103 STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION STATE -FUNDED GRANT AGREEMENT ATTACHMENT F 525-010-60 PROGRAM MANAGEMENT 09/17 Page 1 of 1 CONTRACT PAYMENT REQUIREMENTS Florida Department of Financial Services, Reference Guide for State Expenditures Cost Reimbursement Contracts Invoices for cost reimbursement contracts must be supported by an itemized listing of expenditures by category (salary, travel, expenses, etc.). Supporting documentation shall be submitted for each amount for which reimbursement is being claimed indicating that the item has been paid. Documentation for each amount for which reimbursement is being claimed must indicate that the item has been paid. Check numbers may be provided in lieu of copies of actual checks. Each piece of documentation should clearly reflect the dates of service. Only expenditures for categories in the approved agreement budget may be reimbursed. These expenditures must be allowable (pursuant to law) and directly related to the services being provided. Listed below are types and examples of supporting documentation for cost reimbursement agreements: (1) Salaries: A payroll register or similar documentation should be submitted. The payroll register should show gross salary charges, fringe benefits, other deductions and net pay. If an individual for whom reimbursement is being claimed is paid by the hour, a document reflecting the hours worked times the rate of pay will be acceptable. (2) Fringe Benefits: Fringe Benefits should be supported by invoices showing the amount paid on behalf of the employee (e.g., insurance premiums paid). If the contract specifically states that fringe benefits will be based on a specified percentage rather than the actual cost of fringe benefits, then the calculation for the fringe benefits amount must be shown. Exception: Governmental entities are not required to provide check numbers or copies of checks for fringe benefits. (3) Travel: Reimbursement for travel must be in accordance with Section 112.061, Florida Statutes, which includes submission of the claim on the approved State travel voucher or electronic means. (4) Other direct costs: Reimbursement will be made based on paid invoices/receipts. If nonexpendable property is purchased using State funds, the contract should include a provision for the transfer of the property to the State when services are terminated. Documentation must be provided to show compliance with Department of Management Services Rule 60A-1.017, Florida Administrative Code, regarding the requirements for contracts which include services and that provide for the contractor to purchase tangible personal property as defined in Section 273.02, Florida Statutes, for subsequent transfer to the State. (5) In-house charges:Charges which may be of an internal nature (e.g., postage, copies, etc.) may be reimbursed on a usage log which shows the units times the rate being charged. The rates must be reasonable. (6) Indirect costs:If the contract specifies that indirect costs will be paid based on a specified rate, then the calculation should be shown. Contracts between state agencies, and or contracts between universities may submit alternative documentation to substantiate the reimbursement request that may be in the form of FLAIR reports or other detailed reports. The Florida Department of Financial Services, online Reference Guide for State Expenditures can be found at this web address http://www.myfloridacfo.com/aadir/reference guide/. 104 Consent Item INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF UTILITY SERVICES Date: April 11, 2019 To: Jason E. Brown, County Administrator From: Vincent Burke, P.E., Director of Utility Services Prepared By: Arjuna Weragoda, P.E., Capital Projects Manager Subject: Due Diligence and Project Review - West Regional WWTF Reclaimed Water Storage, Tetra Tech Amendment No. 1 to Work Order No. 2 DESCRIPTIONS AND CONDITIONS: On March 26, 2019, the Indian River County Board of County Commissioners (BCC) approved Work Order No. 2 to Tetra Tech, Inc., to perform a due diligence study prior to the purchase of undeveloped land located at the southwest corner of 82nd Avenue and 4th Street. ANALYSIS: On April 3, 2019, Tetra Tech staff and Indian River County Department Utility Services (IRCDUS) staff, accompanied by personnel from the property owner, conducted a site visit as part of Work Order No. 2. During the site visit, the consultant and IRCDUS staff realized the need for a limited Phase II ESA to be conducted as part of the 90 -day due diligence study. Staff requested Tetra Tech submit a proposal for the additional testing and evaluation. In the essence of time, once the proposal was submitted and reviewed by staff, and with permission from the County Administrator and Purchasing Manager, staff requested a Purchase Order be issued to Tetra Tech in accordance with the 2018 Continuing Contract Agreement for Professional Services. The additional work to be performed is detailed in the proposal and attached as Attachment 1. Staff is preparing to come back to the BCC in June with the results of the due diligence, prior to the expiration of the 90 -day period. FUNDING: Funds for the due diligence investigation are derived from the Other Professional Services account in the operating fund. Operating fund revenues are generated from water and sewer sales. Description Account Number Amount Other Professional Services 47123536-033190 $12,960.00 C:\Users\legistar\AppData\Local\Temp\BCL Technologies\easyPDF 8\@BCL@580E5A73\@BCL@580E5A73.docx 105 Consent Item RECOMMENDATION: Purchase Order No. 83342 was issued to Tetra Tech, Inc., on April 15, 2019, for a sum amount of $12,960.00, which would bring the total sum amount to $68,440.00 for Work Order No. 2. Staff requests that the Indian River County Board of County Commissioners approve Amendment No. 1 to Work Order No. 2 and incorporate the purchase order into the work order so that the limited Phase 11 Environmental Site Assessment work can be performed, given time is of the essence in having the due diligence study completed. ATTACHMENT(s): 1. Tetra Tech; Limited Phase II ESA (7 Pages) C:\Users\legistar\AppData\Local\Temp\BCL Technologies\easyPDF 8\@BCL@580E5A73\@ BCL@580E5A73.docx 106 TETRA TECH April 10, 2019 Arjuna Weragoda, P.E. Indian River County Department of Utility Services 1801 27th Street, Vero Beach 32960-3388 Email: aeragoda@ircgov.com Subject: Proposal to Indian River County for Due Diligence and Project Review West Regional WWTF Reclaimed Water Storage Change Order for Limited Phase II Environmental Site Assessment Dear Mr. Weragoda: Tetra Tech, Inc. (Tetra Tech) is pleased to provide Indian River County with this Scope of Work for Limited Phase II Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) services for the Premier Citrus, LLC properties, located at 200 90th Avenue, 8250 1st Street, and 375 82nd Avenue, Vero Beach, Florida, 32968 (Site). Indian River County is evaluating the property purchase and construction of a reclaimed water storage area on a parcel located immediately to the south of the West Regional Waste Water Treatment Facility (WWTF). BACKGROUND Indian River County needs additional storage of reuse water from the West Regional WWTF during the rainy season when the necessity for reuse water is limited. The West Regional WWTF is sized for a treatment capacity of 6 million gallons per day (MGD). The plant is currently operating at approximately 2 MGD but can only discharge approximately 0.4 MGD or exceed the load allocations into the relief canal. The remainder of the treated water is sent back to the community for reuse. The goal of the proposed reclaimed water storage will be to provide sufficient capacity to store water during the wet season and supply reuse water in the dry season and achieve a zero discharge to the relief canal. The county has identified an approximately 250 -acre parcel immediately to the south of the West Regional WWTF as a potential site for the reclaimed water storage. It is zoned RS -3 and is a citrus grove. The County contacted Tetra Tech to complete due diligence required to assess this potential project, zoning and permitting issues associated with project, geotechnical conditions, limitations from Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) or other agencies, and other business and environmental risks associated with the purchase of the proposed parcel. Tetra Tech conducted a Phase I ESA as part of Work Order No.2 under Tetra Tech's Continuing Consulting and engineering Services Agreement with Indian River County. Although the assessment has not been finalized, Recognized Environmental Conditions (RECs) were identified, and a Limited Phase II ESA was recommended on an expedited turnaround to meet the 90 -day due diligence period. RECs identified to date include: Tetra Tech, Inc. 1 I Riverside Drive, Suite 204, Cocoa, FL 32922 Tel 321.636.6470 Fax 321.636.6473 www.tetratechgc0r7 Mr. Arjuna Weragoda, P.E April 10, 2019 Page 2 • Former citrus grove - Potential releases of metals, pesticides, and herbicides. • Former citrus grove pesticide/herbicide washout areas - Potential releases of metals, pesticides, and herbicides. • Farm fuel and "spray oil" above ground storage tanks — Potential releases of metals, pesticides, herbicides, and petroleum products • Tank laydown area - Potential releases of metals, pesticides, herbicides, and petroleum products SCOPE OF WORK TASK 1— MOBILIZATION- $1,240 This task includes the arrangement of all subcontractors, supplies, and equipment, as well as the preparation of the Site -Specific Health and Safety Plan (HASP) and utility location and clearance. Health and Safety Plan Tetra Tech will prepare a separate stand-alone site-specific HASP detailing the safe work practices to ensure field activities comply with the appropriate safety requirements of the Occupational Safety and Health administration (OSHA). The HASP will also note the physical and chemical hazards that may potentially be present at the Site as well as a map and directions to the nearest hospital. Utility Location and Clearance Tetra Tech will contact the Sunshine One Call underground utility clearance hotline prior to drilling to mark publicly accessible utilities. It is the responsibility of the property point of contact to provide site access and approve all boring locations prior to drilling. Tetra Tech will hand clear all borings; however, Tetra Tech will not be responsible for damage to any utility not brought to its attention. TASK 2 — SOIL AND GROUNDWATER SAMPING AND ANALYSIS IN THE MAINTENANCE AREA - $8,927 Drilling and Sample Collection All borings will be hand augered in the first five feet to minimize the likelihood of damage to unidentified subgrade utilities. A total of 14 2 -inch diameter borings will be hand augered at the site. One temporary monitoring wells will be installed by Ardaman and Associates via hand auger. Borings will be screened with a properly calibrated PID. Samples will be collected in accordance with Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) Standard Operation Procedures (SOPS) as specified in FDEP-SOP-001/01 FS 2200 for water samples and FDEP- SOP-001/01 FS 3000 for soil samples. TETRA TECH 108 Mr. Arjuna Weragoda, P.E April 10, 2019 Page 3 Soil Sampling and Analysis Former citrus grove Soil sampling will be conducted at 4 boring locations in the grove area via hand auger. Surface samples will be collected at the 0- to 1 -foot interval. Analysis of each sample in this area of concern (AOC) will include pesticides via USEPA Method 8081, 8082, and 8141; herbicides via USEPA Method 8151; and arsenic via USEPA Method 6010. This sampling was included in the Work Order 2, and no additional costs are associated with this subtask. Former citrus grove pesticide/herbicide washout areas Exact washout locations were not identified; however, washout areas are anticipated to be located near the well areas, where water supplies were present. Tetra Tech will collect soil samples in the vicinity of the wells located in the maintenance area and in the vicinity of the corner of 4th Street and 90th Avenue. At each location a surface sample will be collected at the 0 - to 1 -foot interval, and a second sample will be collected at the 1- to 2 -foot interval. Analysis of each sample in this AOC will include pesticides via United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) Method 8081, 8082, and 8141; herbicides via USEPA Method 8151; and arsenic via USEPA Method 6010. Farm fuel and spray oil above ground storage tanks Two regulated aboveground storage tanks are present on the property. Historical records show the tanks to be incompliance since the earliest available record in 1991; however, the tanks are visible on the aerial photographs in the current configuration as early as 1974. Other structure in this vicinity prior to 1974 may have also housed tanks for similar use. Tetra Tech will collect soil samples on each of the four sides of the diked containment area. At each location a surface sample will be collected at the 0- to 1 -foot interval. If PID readings are detected, a sample will be collected at the interval with the highest detected PID reading. If no PID readings are detected, a second sample will be collected at the 2- to 3- foot interval. Analysis of each sample in this AOC will include Benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and xylenes (BTEX) and methyl tert-butyl ether (MTBE) via USEPA Method 8260; polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH) via USEPA Method 8270; and Total Recoverable Petroleum Hydrocarbons (TRPH) via FLPRO. A composite of the 0- to 1- foot interval and a second composite sample of the deeper interval will be analyzed for pesticides via USEPA Method 8081, 8082, and 8141; herbicides via USEPA Method 8151; arsenic via USEPA Method 6010. Tank Laydown area A total of 12 steel petroleum tanks were present in a row in the maintenance yard at the time of the Phase I ESA site reconnaissance. Tetra Tech will collect soil samples on each of the four sides of the tank laydown area. At each location a surface sample will be collected at the 0- to 1 - foot interval. If PID readings are detected, a sample will be collected at the interval with the highest detected PID reading. If no PID readings are detected, a second sample will be collected at the 2- to 3- foot interval. TETRA TECH 109 Mr. Arjuna Weragoda, P.E April 10, 2019 Page 4 Analysis of each sample in this AOC will include BTEX and MTBE via USEPA Method 8260; PAH via USEPA Method 8270; and TRPH via FLPRO. A composite of the 0- to 1- foot interval and a second composite sample of the deeper interval will be analyzed for pesticides via USEPA Method 8081, 8082, and 8141; herbicides via USEPA Method 8151; arsenic via USEPA Method 6010. Groundwater Sampling One boring in the Farm fuel and "spray oil" above ground storage tanks area will be converted to 1 -inch diameter temporary monitoring well to collect a groundwater sample for laboratory analysis. The boring with the highest detected PID reading will be selected for groundwater sampling. If no PID readings were detected, the northern side of the contained area will be selected for well installation. PVC well screen will be installed to a depth three feet below the observed groundwater or to boring refusal. The well screen will be 5 -feet long, with 0.010 -inch slots installed at the bottom of the boring above which solid PVC riser will be installed to above the ground surface. A small volume of water will be extracted to develop the well. The temporary monitoring well will be purged and sampled as specified in FDEP-SOP-001/01 FS 2200 no less than 24 -hours and no more than 48 -hours after development is completed. Analysis of the groundwater sample will include pesticides via USEPA Method 8081, 8082, and 8141; herbicides via USEPA Method 8151; arsenic via USEPA Method 6010, BTEX and MTBE via USEPA Method 8260; PAH via USEPA Method 8270; TRPH via FLPRO; and ethylene dibromide (EDB) via USEPA Method 8011. Following sample collection, the temporary well locations will be abandoned by backfilling them with hydrated bentonite flush to the ground surface. Laboratory Analysis and QA/QC Requirements The samples will be submitted under chain -of -custody to Pace Analytical Services, a National Environmental Laboratory Accreditation Program (NELAP)-certified laboratory for analysis with a 5 -day turnaround time. All soil and groundwater samples will be analyzed by the following methods, as noted above and provided in the table below: • BTEX by USEPA Method 8260B • PAHs by USEPA Method 8270C • TRPH by FLPRO Method • Arsenic by EPA Method 6010 • Pesticides including organochlorine pesticides by USEPA Method 8081 and organophosphorus pesticides by USEPA Method 8141 • Herbicides by USEPA Method 8151 • Ethylene Dibromide (EDB) No QA/QC samples will be collected. A summary of the laboratory samples is provided in Table 1, below. TETRA TECH 110 Mr. Arjuna Weragoda, P.E April 10, 2019 Page 5 TABLE 1 AOC Location Soil (S) or Ground- water (G) Sample Location ID Depth Laboratory ID 0 N 't;'°p O o W O ' w o e co S3 .o _o o .a ' Q q cg a 7 >C'a w Q a o t Hoo w (feet bgs) Analysis Grove S 01 0.0-1.0 Grove -S-01-01.0 1 1 1 S 02 0.0-1.0 Grove -S-02-01.1 1 1 1 S 03 0.0-1.0 Grove -S-03-01.2 1 1 1 S 04 0.0-1.0 Grove -S-04-01.3 1 1 1 Wash Out 1 S 01 0.0-1.0 WO1-S-01-01.0 1 1 1 S 01 1.0-2.0 WO1-S-01-02.0 1 1 1 Wash Out 2 S 01 0.0-0.5 W02 -S-01-01.0 1 1 1 S 01 1.0-2.0 W02 -S-01-02.0 1 1 1 1 1 1 AST S 01 0.0-1.0 AST -S-01-01.0 1 1 1 C C C S 01 2.0-3.0 AST -S -01 -TBD 1 1 1 C C C S 02 0.0-1.0 AST -S-02-01.0 1 1 1 C C C S 02 2.0-3.0 AST -S -01 -TBD 1 1 1 C C C S 03 0.0-1.0 AST -S-03-01.0 1 1 1 C C C S 03 2.0-3.0 AST -S -01 -TBD 1 1 1 C C C S 04 0.0-1.0 AST -S-04-01.0 1 1 1 C C C S 04 2.0-3.0 AST -S -01 -TBD 1 1 1 C C C G TBD TBD AST-TMW-TBD-TBD 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Tank Laydown S 01 0.0-1.0 TL -S-01-01.0 1 1 1 C C C S 01 TBD TL -S -01 -TBD 1 1 1 C C C S 02 0.0-1.0 TL -S-02-01.0 1 1 1 C C C S 02 TBD TL -S -01 -TBD 1 1 1 C C C S 03 0.0-1.0 TL -S-03-01.0 1 1 1 C C C S 03 TBD TL -S -01 -TBD 1 1 1 C C C S 04 0.0-1.0 TL -S-04-01.0 1 1 1 C C C S 04 TBD TL -S -01 -TBD 1 1 1 C C C Grab Samples Composite Samples 18 18 18 1 9 9 9 4 4 4 Total 18 18 18 1 13 13 C- One sample composited from each boring at each depth per area ( a total of 4 samples). 13 Investigation Derived Waste (IDW) Advancement of these borings may result in the generation of investigation -derived waste (IDW) such as drill cuttings, excess soil from sampling, excess groundwater and decontamination water. All soil IDW will be placed back in the location from which it was collected. Groundwater IDW will be discharged to the ground in the vicinity where it was collected. TASK 3 - BUILDING MATERIAL SURVEY- WILL NOT BE COMPLETED Based on the age of buildings (constructed in 1964) at the Site, a building material survey was recommended to identify the presence, location, and condition of suspected asbestos containing TETRA TECH 111 Mr. Arjuna Weragoda, P.E April 10, 2019 Page 6 materials (ACM) and lead based paint (LBP). Water intrusion was also observed; however, a mold survey will not be completed. TASK 4 - REPORTING - $2,793 Tetra Tech will prepare a draft letter reports for the Phase II ESA. Summarizing the investigation activities and results of sampling. The draft report will include: a brief description of field activities; the results, conclusions, and recommendations of the investigation; figures showing the sampling locations; a table summarizing the concentrations of detected analytes compared to the applicable regulatory screening criteria; and, attachments with boring logs, and laboratory reports. After receipt of comments, Tetra Tech will finalize the letter reports within 3 working days. The final letter report will be signed and sealed by a Florida Licensed Professional Geologist. PROJECT ' SCHEDULE The approximate duration noted for each task is based on our current understanding and best estimates of time required to perform the basic services and may be subject to change upon agreement between Indian River County and Tetra Tech. Task Timeline Notice to Proceed (NTP) April 12, 2019 Draft Summary Report to the County June 4, 2019 County Comments on Draft Summary Report to Tetra Tech June 8, 2019 Final Summary Report to the County June 12, 2019 ASSUMPTIONS Tetra Tech's scope of services and project costs were developed with the following assumptions: • Tetra Tech will review available data provided by Indian River County. • Surveying services are not included. • Tetra Tech assumes IRC will provide reasonable access to the site for drilling activities and Phase II ESA sampling, including the building interiors, as needed. • Tetra Tech assumes the Phase II ESA field sampling will occur concurrently with Geotechnical borings. PROJECT COST The estimated costs are based on our current understanding of the project requirements and best estimates of level of effort required to perform the basic services and may be subject to change upon agreement between Indian River County and Tetra Tech. The estimated project costs are shown in Table 2, below. This project would be provided as lump sum per task not to exceed $12,960. TETRA TECH 112 Mr. Arjuna Weragoda, P.E April 10, 2019 Page 7 TABLE 2 Personnel Classification Hourly Rate Task 1. Mobilization Task 2. Phase 11 ESA Task 3. Building Material Survey Task 4 Summary Report Subtotal Hours Total s Cost s Cost Hours Cost s Cost Project Manager $159 2 $318 10 $1,591 0 $0 6 $955 18 $2,864 Engineer IV $137 6 $822 0 $0 0 $0 5 $685 11 $1,507 Professional Geologist $173 0 $0 3 $520 0 $0 4 $693 7 $1,214 Scientist V (Biologist) $120 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 80 GIS Analyst 11 $90 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 4 $360 4 $360 Contract Administrator $100 1 $100 0.5 $50 0 $0 1 $100 2.5 $249 Labor Total 9 $1,240 14 $2,161 0 $0 20 P $2,793 43 $6,194 Travel and ODCs Unit Cost Units Cost Units Cost Units Cost Units Cost Subtotal Units Travel from Cocoa to IRC $70 $0 2 $140 0 $0 $0 2 5140 Travel and ODCs Total $0 $140 $0 $0 $140 Subcontracto r (cos t +10 %) Unit Cost Units Cost Units Cost Units Cost Units Cost Subtotal Units Pb03 Environmental Monitoring (Lead) $1,740 $0 $0 0 $0 $0 0 $0 Pb03 Environmental Monitoring (Asbestos) $3,280 $0 $0 0 $0 $0 0 $0 Pb03 Environmental Monitoring (Mold) $2,900 $0 $0 0 $0 $0 0 $0 Equipment Rental $451 $0 1 $496 80 $0 1 $496 Laboratory (Pesticides) $175 $0 9 $1,733 80 $0 9 $1,733 Laboratory (Herbicides) $110 $0 9 $1,089 80 $0 9 $1,089 Laboratory (BTEX) $35 $0 18 $693 $0 $0 18 $693 Laboratory (PAH) $70 $0 18 $1,386 80 $0 18 $1,386 Laboratory(FLPRO) $45 $0 18 $891 80 $0 18 $891 Laboratory (EDB) $38 $0 1 $42 $0 $0 1 $42 Laboratory (Arsenic) $30 $0 9 $297 $0 $0 9 $297 Subcontractor Total $0 $6,626 $0 $0 $6,626 PROJECT TOTAL $1,240 $8,927 $0 $2,793 $12,960 Indian River County will be invoiced each month for services rendered during the previous calendar month based on percent complete. Tetra Tech shall be paid for all invoices within 30 days of an approved submittal. Tetra Tech looks forward to working with you on this project. We are available to discuss our approach with you in detail at your convenience. Should you have any questions regarding this proposal, please contact me at (321) 636-6470. Project Manager Cc: Brian Watson, P.E., Tetra Tech Dave Giddens, P.G. TETRA TECH 113 April 23, 2019 Community Development INDIAN RIVER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS INTER -OFFICE MEMORANDUM To: Members of the Board of County Commissioners Date: April 16, 2019 Subject: Applications for BCC Appointees on the Metropolitan Planning Organization Citizens Advisory Committee (MPO CAC) From: Ed Offutt, Commissioner Assistant I would appreciate the Board's review of the three listed applicants to fill the two vacant BCC Appointee positions on the MPO CAC. Attachments: Application of Mike Grim Application of Erica Ogilvie Application of Chris Murphy 114 J Name: t&rOJ 11 2 ( )1 . INDIAN RIVER COUNTY APPLICATION FOR COMMITTEE APPOINTMENT Jon Michael Grim Full Name: Jon Michael Grim Street Address (No P.O. Boxes): Home Phone: n/a Date: �--� mic Civ J 03/09/19 Email Address: mikegrim ®comcast.net 1327085th Street Work Phone: n/a How long have you been a resident of Indian River County? Cell Phone: 804-921-3761 3 years 8 months Are you a full or part time resident? Check one: Full Time__ Part Time❑ Please Ilst current employer.or business. If retired, please list any business experience that may be applicable to the committee. Retired from 30 year career in banking covering full spectrum of responsibilities -_commercial and residential lending, business development, branch management, etc. Ability to work as team member or lead, collect and analyze data, present findings. More recently, worked with other Fellsmere-area property owners on Initiative that led County Commission to approve expansion of road grading and maintenance to previously excluded roadways. For the past four years, Board Member and Sponsor Liaison for Fellsmere Frog Leg Festivarwifh responsibility for sponsor management, including, communications, information collection,.new sponsorship solicitations, etc. Please list any licenses you presently hold: Please list any organization of which you are currently a member: The Hundred Club of Indian River County Fellsmere Area Property Owners Association Republican Veterans of Indian River County Please list any other committees or boards you currently sit on: Fellsmere Frog Leg Festival Continued on next page 115 Place a check mark next to the committee(s) you would like to serve on: AFFORDABLE HOUSING ADVISORY COMMITTEE n AGRICULTURE ADVISORY COMMITTEE n BEACH & SHORE PRESERVATION ADVISORY COMMITTEE fl CHILDREN'S SERVICES ADVISORY COMMITTEE U CODE ENFORCEMENT BOARD n COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT CONSTRUCTION BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT & APPEALS DEVELOPMENT REVIEW AND PERMIT PROCESS ADVISORY COMMITTEE n ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL HEARING BOARD ■ MPO BICYCLE ADVISORY COMMITTEE n MPO CITIZEN ADVISORY COMMITTEE PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION n SCHOOL PLANNING CITIZEN OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE n TOURIST DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL TRANSPORTATION DISADVANTAGED LOCAL COORDINATING BOARD n TREASURE COAST REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL — COMPREHENSIVE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY n VALUE ADJUSTMENT BOARD — MUST OWN HOMESTEAD PROPERTY WITHIN INDIAN RIVER COUNTY n Please print and return the completed application, along with a current resume! to the Board of County Commission office, 1801 27th Street, Vero Beach, FL. 32960, or by fax at 772-770-5334. Please note: All applications are kept on file for 6 months. Print 116 Jon Michael Grim 13270 85'h Street • Fellsmere, FL 32948 MikeGrim@comcast.net 804.921.3761 Skills and Abilities Teamwork Decision Making Leadership Relationship Building Self-motivation Adaptability Verbal Communication Conflict Resolution Follow-through Experience Fellsmere Frog Leg Festival Fellsmere, FL Budget Committee Member March 2019 to Current • Assist in establishing budget for upcoming Festival. Board Member and Sponsor Liaison October 2015 to Current • Responsible for sponsor management, including communications, information collection, new sponsorship solicitations, etc. Self -Employed Chesterfield, VA Independent Contractor September 2007 to December 2016 (Retired) • Commercial and residential real estate liquidation. First Community Bank (Common Wealth Bank, prior to June 2003) Richmond, VA Senior Vice President March 2004 to August 2007 Vice President May 2003 to February 2004 • Responsible for regional loan growth from $126 million to $180 million. • Coordinated branch expansion in Chesterfield and Hanover Counties, Virginia. • Managed commercial processors and special assets department. • Loan approval responsibility for managers of all regional branch offices. Assistant Vice President - Commercial Loans September 2002 to April 2003 • Business development. • Responsible for inspections of new construction and advances of all proceeds. • Analyzed applicants' financial status, credit and property evaluation to determine feasibility of granting loans; prepared report of findings. WesBanco Clarksburg, WV Assistant Vice President March 1996 to June 2002 • Responsible for business origination and management of $25 million loan portfolio consisting of 80% commercial and 20% residential. • Excellent track record for total portfolio delinquency (under 1 %). • Approved loans within specified limits and referred loans to loan committee for approval. • Ensured loan agreements were complete and accurate according to policy. • Contacted customers and business, community and civic organizations to promote goodwill and generate new business. One Valley Bank Clarksburg, WV Assistant Vice President January 1993 to March 1996 • Recommended approval of customer applications for lines and extension of lines of credit, commercial loans, real estate loans, consumer credit loans and credit card accounts. 117 Jon Michael Grim Page 2 The Empire National Bank (Merger with One Valley Bank, 1994) Clarksburg, WV Personal Banking Officer September 1990 to January 1993 Consumer Lending Officer May 1989 to September 1990 FirstBank Branch Manager • Managed branch. Nutter Fort, Shinnston & Bridgeport, WV November 1988 to May 1989 • Directed activities to implement institution's policies, procedures and practices concerning granting and extending lines of credit, commercial loans, real estate loans and consumer credit loans. • Expedited communication between upper level management and general personnel. • Contacted customers and business, community and civic organizations to promote goodwill and generate new business. • Examined, evaluated and processed loan applications. • Maintained high standards of excellence. • Interviewed and hired workers. • Helped oversee all aspects of lending. Manager, Installment Loan Operations Commercial Loan Officer Assistant Branch Manager Consumer Banking Officer Bank of Hundred Student Loan Officer Teller August 1987 to November 1988 January 1986 to November 1987 February 1985 to January 1986 November 1984 to January 1985 Hundred, WV July 1983 to October 1984 June 1981 to July 1983 Education and Training Numerous Risk Management Association and American Bankers Association courses. One Valley Bank Supervisory/Management Workshop. West Virginia School of Banking. 1993 Graduate. Successful Life Course. Fairmont State College, Clarksburg, WV. Hundred High School, Hundred, WV. Organizations and Awards The Hundred Club of Indian River County. Republican Veterans of Indian River County (non -veteran member). Fellsmere-area Property Owners Association. Big Brothers Big Sisters Greater Richmond (Virginia) & Tri -Cities Volunteer. Arthritis Association Volunteer. Risk Management Association, Board Member. Clarksburg WV Kiwanis, Member. United Way Volunteer, Business Sector. Banking Administration Institute, Board of Directors, 1991 - 1994. 118 25. 2019 3:G4P�ovM\Rea Name: King/Remax INDIAN RIVER COUNTY APPLICATION FOR COMMITTEE APPOINTMENT Erica V. Ogilvie Full Name: Erica V. Ogilvie Street Address (No P.Q. Boxes): Home Phone: 772-581-7233 Date: Jo. 6077 P. 2/3 1()CD cnc 03110/19 Email Address: ericeogilvieggmail.com 1021 Genesee Ave. Sebsatian, FI 32958 Work Phone: How long have you been a resident of Indian River County? CeII Phone: 772-633-4779 30 years Are you a full or part time resident? Check one: Full Time Part Timet I Please list current employer or business. if retired, please list any business experience that may be applicable to the committee. Self Employed Realtor Remax Crown Realty Please list any licenses you presently hold: Real Estate License Please list any organization of which you are currently a member: St. Sebastian Church, Italian America Civic Association, National Association of Realtors, Graduate of the Real Estate lnstituta. Please list any other committees or boards you currently sit on: Realtor Board of Indian River County MLS Committee Goverment Affairs Committee Brevard County Board of Realtors Continued on next' page 119 Mar. 25.2019 3:04PM Realty King/Remax Place a check mark next to the committee(s) you would like to serve on: No. 6077 AFFORDABLE HOUSING ADVISORY COMMITTEE AGRICULTURE ADVISORY COMMITTEE BEACH & SHORE PRESERVATION ADVISORY COMMITTEE CHILDREN'S SERVICES ADVISORY COMMITTEE fl CODE ENFORCEMENT BOARD fl COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT El CONSTRUCTION BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT & APPEALS x DEVELOPMENT REVIEW AND PERMIT PROCESS ADVISORY COMMITTEE jfl ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL , 0 ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL HEARING BOARD 11 MPO BICYCLE ADVISORY COMMITTEE MPO CITIZEN ADVISORY COMMITTEE PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION • SCHOOL PLANNING CITIZEN OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE fl TOURIST DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL fl TRANSPORTATION DISADVANTAGED LOCAL COORDINATING BOARD Ej TREASURE COAST REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL — COMPREHENSIVE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY VALUE ADJUSTMENT BOARD — MUST OWN HOMESTEAD PROPERTY WITHIN INDIAN RIVER COUNTY [-- . „ 0044 pi.e.ii,t..afia,i.-sgiiiiini0Z04§1,40 :ptiiterefe:SOrn to the Board of County Commission office, 1801 27th Street, Vero Beach, FL. 32960, or by fax at 772-770-5334. Please note: All applications are kept on file for 6 months. Y 415_ 120 Experience RE/MAX Crown Realty, Sebastian FL 2000 -present REALTOR° ERA Mid Florida, Sebastian FL 1997-1999 REALTOR® Community and Civil Associations Member of Board of Realtors — since 1997 Chairman of Events Community — 2004-2005 Chairman of Habit for Humanities Community — 2002-2004 Member of Italian American Civic Association 2016 -present Member of Italian American Club —2010- present Member Board of Realtors Government Affairs Committee -2017 -present Board of Realtors MLS Committee — present Member of the Exchange Club — 2006 —2009 Education Branford High School, Branford CT Graduated 1988 Designations RE/MAX Hall of Fame RE/MAX 100% Club GRI- Gradate REALTOR® Institute Designation ePRO Certification Erica V. Ogilvie 1021 Genesee Avenue, Sebastian FL 32958 772-633-4779/ ericaogilvie@gmail.com 121 From: Erica Ogilvie [mailto:ericaogilvie@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2019 3:18 PM To: Tina Cournoyer <tcournoyer@ircgov.com> Subject: Re: MPO CAC Hi Tina, My intent was to be a participant on the MPO CAC board. Thank you, Erica Erica V. Ogilvie Realtor Remax Crown On Mar 27, 2019, at 1:35 PM, Tina Cournoyer <tcournoyer@ircgov.com> wrote: Ed- She faxed her application to the BCC office...attached. Erica—can you please clarify that you wish to be considered for MPO CAC, since that box is not checked on your application? Thanks! Tina From: Ed Offutt Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2019 1:04 PM To: Phil Matson <pmatson@ircgov.com> Cc: Tina Cournoyer <tcournoyer@ircgov.com> Subject: MPO CAC Hi Phil – We received a committee application from Erica Ogilvie a short time ago, and note that she did not ask to be considered for the MPO CAC. Was this intentional, or did you expect her to apply for the CAC? If you did expect her to apply for CAC, I will contact her and ask for an email I can include with her application, expressing her revised intent. Best regards ed Edwin J. Offutt Commissioner Assistant (Districts 2 and 3) Indian River County 180127th Street 122 Name: INDIAN RIVER COUNTY APPLICATION FOR COMMITTEE APPOINTMENT Christopher Murphy Full Name: Christopher Murphy Street Address (No P.O. Boxes): Home Phone: 772-233-3178 Date: 9/22/16 -updated 4/10/19 Email Address: cmeng2@att.net 780 Blackpine Drive, Vero Beach, FL 34968 Work Phone: 772-233-3178 How long have you been a resident of Indian River County? CeII Phone: 772-233-3178 12 yrs+ Are you a full or part time resident? Check one: Full Timers Part Timer Please list current employer or business. If retired, please list any business experience that may be applicable to the committee. Knight McGuire & Associates, Inc.- Experienced in both private sector and public sector projects that involve any of the following: Community and neighborhood re -development, transportation planning, water & sewer utility operations, planning (i.e. zoning/ long range planning), grant acquisition, water resources and governmental budgeting Please list any licenses you presently hold: Florida Professional Engineer Florida Real Estate Sales Associate Florida 220 Insurance License Please list any organization of which you are currently a member: Boy Scout Troop 473 Please list any other committees or boards you currently sit on: Environmental Control Hearing Board Continued on next page 123 Place a check mark next to the committee(s) you would like to serve on: AFFORDABLE HOUSING ADVISORY COMMITTEE ❑ AGRICULTURE ADVISORY COMMITTEE C BEACH & SHORE PRESERVATION ADVISORY COMMITTEE ❑ CHILDREN'S SERVICES ADVISORY COMMITTEE u CODE ENFORCEMENT BOARD C COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT ✓ CONSTRUCTION BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT & APPEALS ❑ ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL ❑ ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL HEARING BOARD R1 MPO BICYCLE ADVISORY COMMITTEE ❑ MPO CITIZEN ADVISORY COMMITTEE J PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION I7 I SCHOOL PLANNING CITIZEN OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE ❑ TOURIST DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL TRANSPORTATION DISADVANTAGED LOCAL COORDINATING BOARD ❑ TREASURE COAST REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL — COMPREHENSIVE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY ❑ VALUE ADJUSTMENT BOARD — MUST OWN HOMESTEAD PROPERTY INDIAN RIVER COUNTY r1WITHIN Please print faid(anco(ilko completed application, along 2pgErm resume to the Board of County Commission office, 1801 27th Street, Vero Beach, FL. 32960, or by fax at 772-770-5334. Please note: All applications are kept on file for 6 months. 124 Resume for consideration for appointment to Indian River County Volunteer Committee Positions September 2016 Chris Murphy, P.E., ME, MPA 780 Blackpine Drive Vero Beach, FL 32968 Phone: 772-233-3178 Email: cmeng2@att.net Education: Master of Engineering, University of Florida, 2008 Master of Public Administration, University of Central Florida, 1999 Bachelor of Science, University of Florida, 1994 Experience: 2006-2018: CivilSury Design Group, Inc., Director of Engineering (10yrs) 2003-2005: Port Orange, FL- Community Development Engineer (3yrs) 2000-2006: Weldon Land Development, Inc. (6yrs/owner) 1999-2000: Longwood, FL- City Engineer (2yrs) 1996-1999: Winter Springs, FL- Stormwater Utility Manager (3yrs) 1994-1996: Martin County BOCC- Engineering Assistant (1.5yrs) Activities: Boy Scouts of America, Assistant Scout Master, Troop 473 Rotary Club of Vero Beach, Board Member Other Licensure/Certifications Florida Professional Engineer Florida Real Estate Sales Associate License Florida P&C 220 Insurance License 125 TO: THRU: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Indian River County, Florida Memorandum Jason Brown, County Administrator Kristin Daniels, Director, OMB Beth Martin, Risk Manager April 5, 2019 Property/Casualty Insurance 2019-20 /2E/ Please consider the following for inclusion on the April 23, 2019 Board of County Commissioners' agenda. Background In preparation for the May 1, 2019 renewal, staff worked with Arthur J. Gallagher Risk Management Services, Inc. (AJG) to secure the most comprehensive, cost-efficient property and casualty insurance program for the County. On February 5, 2019 the County extended the service agreement with AJG for one year, and we present a program with a 6.36% percent premium increase based upon increased inland marine (heavy equipment and vehicles) value and property insurance premiums. Additionally, the cyber liability coverage was expanded to include network interruption and privacy notification services. The table below summarizes the lines of coverage and costs. It is followed by a discussion detailing variables that impacted renewal rates. Coverage Property Equipment Breakdown Inland Marine Terrorism Liability NCBR Terrorism Property Terrorism Crime Public Entity Excess Liability Excess Workers Compensation Cyber Hull/P&I GL/parking lot Fee TOTAL Summary Current Renewal Increase Change $1,221,337 $1,326,994 $105,657 8.65% 10,890 10,742 (148) -1.36% 59,790 67,193 7,403. 12.38% 11,500 11,122 (378) -3.29% 7,275 6,685 (590) -8.11% 9,500 8,729 (771) -8.12% 5,005 5,005 0 0.00% 153,300 151,825 (1,475) -0.96% 171,216 171,468 252 0.15% 19,443 27,522 8,079 41.55% 7,808 7,808 0 0.00% 1,976 1,888 (88) -4.45% 175,000 175,000 0 0% $1,854,040 $1,971,981 $117,941 6.36% 126 Analysis Attached, please find the detailed Executive Summary prepared by Erica Connick, Account Executive, AJG. Several charts within the Executive Summary detail the various lines of coverage. Highlights of the renewal are: Property: Total insured property values decreased 2.27% with the transfer of Historic Dodgertown properties coverage to that organization. The renewal was fully marketed to 30 markets, yet with the industry facing insured losses from Florence and Michael along with the California wildfires, the property market has hardened. At the same time, the County has recovered $5,688,375 from Matthew and is to receive an estimated $3,435,183 for Irma, representing 115% of the premium paid for the last five policy years. The table below illustrates historical premium data: Policy Year Exposure Premium Annual Rate Limits Purchased Named Storm Limit 2007-08 342,013,377 2,387,500 0.7 150,000,000 50,000,000 2008-09 414,241,373 1,950,350 0.47 150,000,000 50,000,000 4/1/09- 5/1/10 426,623,770 1,412,500 0.33 175,000,000 25,000,000 2010-11 301,589,497 1,350,000 0.45 200,000,000 50,000,000 2011-12 347,436,734 1,049,302 0.3 200,000,000 50,000,000 2012-13 332,426,422 1,316,000 0.4 200,000,000 25,000,000 2013-14 333,657,066 1,264,537 0.38 200,000,000 25,000,000 2014-15 342,345,764 1,205,000 0.35 200,000,000 35,000,000 2015-16 343,203,562 994,238 0.29 200,000,000 35,000,000 2016-17 352,048,567 948,446 0.27 200,000,000 40,000,000 2017-18 365,509,174 984,710 0.27 200,000,000 40,000,000 2018-19 381,676,150 1,240,000 0.32 200,000,000 40,000,000 2019-20 372,933,092 1,324,438 0.36 200,000,000 40,000,000 Equipment Breakdown: The $10,742.00 renewal premium is a 1.36% premium decrease. Inland Marine: The premium increased 12.38% with a renewal premium of $67,193.00. Included in this line of coverage are vehicles valued over $100,000.00, contractors' equipment, rented and leased equipment and golf carts. The premium increase is based upon a 7% rate decrease but increased inventory in the line of coverage. The loss limit has also been increased from $15 million to $20 million. Terrorism: Renewal premiums have decreased. For the property program, the premium is $8,729.00. For the liability program, the premium is $17,807.00. Crime: The premium remains the same upon renewal. Coverage will remain with the incumbent carrier, Hanover. 127 Public Entity Excess Liability Package: The 0.96% decrease includes coverage for drones. The package includes excess general liability, auto liability, public officials' liability, miscellaneous liability, employee benefits liability, law enforcement activities and EMS operations. Premium is $151,825.00. Excess Workers' Compensation: The market for public employer workers' compensation is extremely limited due to fire and police exposures which are subject to presumption laws. Nevertheless, the renewal proposal from Safety National again offers a $650,000.00 self-insured retention. While payroll slightly decreased, there was an increase in costs based upon increased exposure with the addition of a fourth helicopter. Cost for renewal is $171,468.00. Cyber Liability: The County initially purchased this coverage in 2014, and the renewal premium of $27,522.00 expands coverage for network interruption and privacy event services. Hull and Protection & Indemnity: Premium remains $7,808.00 for this watercraft coverage. General Liability/Parking Lot: This stand-alone policy provides coverage for the First Baptist Church adjacent to the Main Library and used by Library patrons as a parking area. The County is contractually required to maintain this coverage. The annual premium is $1,888.00. Fee: This annual fee remains the same at $175,000.00 for broker services to AJG. Funding Funding in the amount of $1,971,981 for insurance coverage is budgeted and available in the Self Insurance Fund, Other Insurance account (account number 50224613-034590). The Self Insurance Fund is an internal service fund that allocates charges to the County's user funds. Recommendation Staff recommends that the Board approve the renewal and authorize staff to bind coverage for May 1, 2019 through April 30, 2020 with a current annual premium of $1,971,981 based upon the current schedule of values and coverage selections and approve the included broker annual fee of $175,000.00. Approved for Agenda April 23, 2019 128 Indian River County Board of County Commissioners Executive Summary C:CORE36CI Arthur J. Gallagher Risk Management Services, Inc. appreciates the opportunity to present this proposal for your consideration. We are very pleased to present Indian River County BOCC with a comprehensive property and casualty insurance proposal effective May 1, 2019 - May 1, 2020 Market Conditions In early 2017, insurance industry surplus was approaching record levels and the market was continuing a softening trend. With capital continuing to increase, carrier competition and demand for growth kept rates down in the core property and casualty lines with the exception of auto liability. Unfortunately, the past two years of loss activity has changed the direction of the market, summarized below: • In 2017, industry property losses exceeded $100 Billion mainly due to hurricanes Harvey, Irma, and Maria (HIM), leading to a tightening of the property market in 2018. Average rate increases for Florida loss -free programs were approximately +10%. • In 2018, hurricanes Florence & Michael along with the California wildfires lead to a further hardening of the property market going into 2019's renewals • As a result of 2 unprofitable years, nearly all carriers both domestically and internationally are re -underwriting their books of business. Certain Lloyds syndicates are shutting down their direct insurance businesses, and multiple domestic carriers are cutting back capacity, or dramatically increasing rates These challenges have resulted in a difficult property market in 2019 - the market has actually gotten worse as the year has progressed. Many loss -free, $1 Billion+ TIV accounts are experiencing 15% to 20% rate increases in Florida this year. Smaller accounts have experienced fewer challenges than those programs, where you have a large percentage of the overall market engaged on the program. In addition to the pressure and hardening of the property insurance market, we continue to see deterioration of results and upward rate pressure in the Auto liability. The rest of the casualty lines are flat or up slightly. Catastrophe Model In order to assist in selection of an appropriate named windstorm limit of insurance, we have included the windstorm catastrophe model. Critical Return Prob. Period RMS VERSION 9.1 RMS VERSION 11 (2013) [_ l[ Ground Up rGross Loss 0.20%11 500'[ $ 58,734,3451[$49,150,564_] x0.40%1 Ground Up -Gross Loss RMS VERSION 18 (2019) [ Ground Up 1 Gross Loss - 80,633,3303 $73,681,555J, $ 57,573,0-$ 52,708,665 61,388,653] 2501 $ 35,108,293J $29,864,682 $ 1.00%1 100 [$ 20,074,369[[$14,119,862JL$ AAL $ - 786,1871x$ 599,166,; $ [$55,425,938] E$ 40,138,592 X35,824,4651 44,226,4317V39,260,026[ $ 25,659,47-77f,_$ 22,086,5891 25,048, 777 $21,353,155 [$ 11,589,316 [$ 9,104,369] 984,4§-617$ 755,490! $ 471,4321$ 351,9001 �I'r Gallagher Insurance I Risk Management I Consulting Indian River County Board of County Commissioners C:CORE36CY Per your request we approached three appraisal firms for updated appraisals and to obtain secondary COPE on the County's buildings. Below you will find a brief overview of what was received: Firm Description of Services Estimated Cost per Building Total Estimated Cost ASSETWORKS Re -Appraised Approximately 108 buildings, over $150,000 each (Valuation for Building/Structures, Modeling of Contents, COPE, GPS, Modeling of Contents, Flood Zones) $160 $17,280 Re -Appraised Approximately 123 buildings over $100,000 each (Valuation for Building/Structures, Modeling of Contents, COPE, GPS, Modeling of Contents, Flood Zones) $155 $19,065 Additional Buildings - Per above "cost per building" option chosen CBIZ Valuation of 69 buildings over $500,000 $15,000 Valuation of 35 buildings over $1,500,000 $10,000 DUFF & PHELPS Sampling of 29 buildings (Fire Stn, Courthouse, Health Dept, Main Library, Jail, Lift Station, Largest Water Treatment) $17,000 $17,000 This additional data will help with your model results and will assist the carriers in the future at providing the County with competitive rates. Overview of 2017 Property Renewal In 2016 the County has submitted a claim for Hurricane Mathew which currently exceeds the 40% loss ratio the rate agreement was subject to. The claim was still in its early stages during renewal negotiations and the adjuster was still collecting data to properly value the claim and evaluating coverage. As a result, we approached your incumbent markets early and they all agreed to the rate agreement in place. We also negotiated to extend the flat rate agreement to 2018 renewal subject to the 40% loss ratio. However the rate agreement was not applicable to the 2018 renewal due to 2017 and 2018 losses. Insurance I Risk Management I Consulting Indian River County Board of County Commissioners SogCORE360" Historical Results The chart below shows the annual changes in limits, values, premiums, rates and named storm limit back to 2007. Exposure r 07-08 — T $342,013,3771 08-09 $414,241,373 Premium $2,387,500 $1,950,350 Annual Rate $0.70 Limits Purchased $0.47 Named Storm Limit 150,000,000 150,000,000 ;j 175,000,000 ' 50,000,0001 50,000,000 4/1/09-5/1/10 10-11 $426,623,770 $1,412,500 ' $0.33 $301,589,497 $1,350,000' $0.45'[ 200,000,000. $1,049,302 $0.30 L 200,000,000 50,000,000 25,000,000 50,000,000 11-12 $347,436,7341 12-13 13-14 $332,426,422 `i.„ $1,316,000 $0.40 ! 200,000,000 $333,657,066 ! $1,264,5377 $0.38 ! 200,000,000 25,000,000 , 25,000,000 14-15 1 $342,345,764 $1,205,000 $0.35 ; 200,000,000 35,000,000 15-16 $343,203,562 $994,238 $0.29 ; 200,000,000 35,000,000 L 16-17 17-18 18-19 19-20 $352,048,567 $365,509,1741' $381,605,432 $372,933,092 $948,446 $984,710 $1,221,289 $1,324,438 $0.27 f 200,000,000 $0.27 200,000,000 $0.32 200,000,000 $0.36. 200,000,000 40,000,000 40,000,000 40,000,000 40,000,000 Hurricane Mathew & Irma Losses The County's renewal continues to be challenging due to the paid Mathew claim and the pending Irma claim. Below goes over the County's submitted claims in the last two policy years. Mathew Loss Claim Payment IRMA Loss Claim Payment* Schedule Locations MUL - Beaches Property in the Open TOTAL $1,37.1,986 i 'f $13,129,096' $3,171,072 $17,672,153 t $688,375', - - - - L $2,009,443 $935,183_ $2,500,0007r $3,761,160,1 $2,500,0__001 $2,500,000 $55,135 $ $5,688,375 Estimate Paid out Claims Total Premium last 5 years Loss Ratio for last 5 Years $5,825,738 $3,435,1831 — Jr $9,123,558 $7,934,268 Current Property Insurance Program Indian River County's current property insurance program is based on total insurable values of $381,676,150 and provides a program limit of $200 million with $40 million for Named Windstorm Coverage, $25 million each for Flood and Earthquake Aggregate Annually except $10 million for Special Flood Hazard Area. The policy deductible is $100,000 with a 5% Named Hurricane with a maximum per occurrence of $5 million. The current total annual premium, including assessments is $1,221,337 with a rate per $100 in values of $.32 excluding terrorism coverage. Indian River County Board of County Commissioners ::: CORE360" The County's total insurable values for the 2018-19 renewal decreased from $381,605,432 to $372,933,092, a total decrease of 2.27%. We did increase the building values by 3% however the decrease in value is a result of removing the Dodger Town Property. Where we are at Today: We have fully marketed the County's renewal to 30 markets. This year we have been struggling with filling capacity at a reasonable price within the primary layers. The County's primary layer currently has five carriers however Evanston wanted to move to a higher layer and Ironshore wanted to decrease their participation. We have added Berkshire (National Fire & Marine), Lloyds of London — Syndicate Beazely and Endurance. We have also replaced Colony as their layer price was 11% higher than our highest quote and they no longer want to accept Hurricane deductibles. Terms continue to be scrutinized therefore the following will be changed at renewal: • Newly Acquired Property — Changed from 120 days to 90 Days reporting • Excluded Property o Miscellaneous Property in the Open — Last year the miscellaneous sublimit of $2,000,000 was removed and the intent was to exclude this property going forward. However to clarify the intent carrier's want to add this as a specific item under the Property Excluded section of the coverage form. Miscellaneous Property in the Open will be defined as real and/or personal property within the territorial limits, which property is at risk of the Insured at inception of the policy but has not been listed on a report provided to the insurer at inception. o Golf Course Tees, Greens and Fairways — Again the intent is to not cover this property under the current policy however to clarify the intent this property will be specifically named within the Property Excluded section. o Definitions will be added further clarifying carrier's intent to not cover land, land improvements or property in the open. o Electronic Data — Several carriers include their own definitions for Cyber and electronic data. The majority of the marketplace is moving for all electronic data being excluded however caused Cyber and/or a Windstorm, Flood, Fire, etc. We attempt to negotiate non -cyber perils to be covered. However in 2019 we are losing the majority of these battles. o No coverage for pre-existing damages • We continue to have a few other terms and conditions that are in negotiation. If we are not successful with their removal, we will let you know. This year the final premium including surcharges is $1,326,994; a $105,657 increase over expiring. Overall that is a 10.97% rate increase from expiring. Equipment Breakdown In 2017, Travelers agreed to a 3.15% rate decrease and rate agreement through 2019 subject to a 30% loss ratio. The County's renewal premium is $10,742; a 2.27% decrease. The following coverage enhancements remain on the 2019 renewal: 1. Expediting Expense is provided up to policy limit, the expired limit was $1,000,000 — The carrier will agree to pay reasonable extra costs to make temporary repairs or expedite permanent repairs, which would ultimately reduce the total cost of the claim. 2. Claim data expense limit of $25,000 which will allow you to pay for expenses you incurred in preparing the claims data, this can include appraisals, preparing income statements, and other documentation; previously no coverage was provided. 3. Deductible Waiver — Your equipment breakdown deductible will be waived if you suffer a loss that is covered via your property program and the equipment breakdown policy. 4. Off Premise Equipment Coverage — Provides coverage to covered equipment that suffers a breakdown and is located at a temporary location that is not a covered location. 5. Amend Knowledge of Occurrence to executive officer or risk manager 5 Gallagher Insurance I Risk Management I Consulting Indian River County Board of County Commissioners oosCORE360' Inland Marine — Vehicles over $100,000, Contractors Equipment, Rented & Leased Equipment and Golf Carts In 2017 we approached six markets on your behalf and received various declinations except XL. Markel, your incumbent offered a 7% rate decrease, and agreed to increase the loss limit from $15 million to $20 million. Markel agreed to remove the following "property not covered" from the Auto Physical Damage form: a. Property while being used or operated in other than "Fire Department activities;" b. Tires or Glass. In 2018 Markel offered a 1.22% rate increase as well as a rate agreement for the 19-20 renewal and they have agreed to offer a flat rate as long as one or more conditions in the agreement were not met. The County will need to continue the audit the current policy and the County will need to provide the rental expenditure for leased equipment. Terrorism Property, NCBR Property & Terrorism Liability including NCBR The County's Terrorism & NCBR policy covers all locations currently reported on your Property program, and inland marine schedule. The total insured value for this renewal is $402,525,974; a 1% exposure decrease. The NCBR Property Damage coverage and Terrorism Liability including NCBR terms and conditions are per expiring. The renewal premium is $17,807; a 5.2% decrease. The Terrorism Property Damage policy renewal premium is $8,729; an 8% decrease. The Terrorism policy will remain on the Vehicle A form which follows your all risk placement with sublimits that override the all- risk in respect to terrorism only. These sublimits include Claims Preparation, Transit, Seepage Contamination and Pollution / Clean-up, etc. The policy provides financial loss as a result of a threat, loss of attraction including non -damage to the insured out to a 2.5 mile radius from an insured location and denial of access including non -damage out of 2.5 mile radius from an insured location. In 2018 we negotiated a three year policy subject to a 5% rate decrease with annual installments subject to no losses or major reductions in exposure (20% increase in insured value.) Crime In 2018 we marketed your policy to Hanover and Travelers. The County decided to remain with Hanover and opted for another three year term with annual installments. The installment due at this time is $5,005. Exposure T Premium 1 Annual Rate 14-15 $ 14,816,005 $ 45,854 $ 0.3095 15-16 $ 19,531,041 $ 53,032 $ 0.2715 16-17 $ 21,970,630 $ 53,606 $ 0.2440 17-18 $ 22,973,220 $ 51,771 $ 0.2254 18-19 $ 25,088,873 $ 59,790 $ 0.2383 19-20 $ 29,592,882 $ 67,193 $ 0.2271 Change 17.95% 12.38% -4.71% The County will need to continue the audit the current policy and the County will need to provide the rental expenditure for leased equipment. Terrorism Property, NCBR Property & Terrorism Liability including NCBR The County's Terrorism & NCBR policy covers all locations currently reported on your Property program, and inland marine schedule. The total insured value for this renewal is $402,525,974; a 1% exposure decrease. The NCBR Property Damage coverage and Terrorism Liability including NCBR terms and conditions are per expiring. The renewal premium is $17,807; a 5.2% decrease. The Terrorism Property Damage policy renewal premium is $8,729; an 8% decrease. The Terrorism policy will remain on the Vehicle A form which follows your all risk placement with sublimits that override the all- risk in respect to terrorism only. These sublimits include Claims Preparation, Transit, Seepage Contamination and Pollution / Clean-up, etc. The policy provides financial loss as a result of a threat, loss of attraction including non -damage to the insured out to a 2.5 mile radius from an insured location and denial of access including non -damage out of 2.5 mile radius from an insured location. In 2018 we negotiated a three year policy subject to a 5% rate decrease with annual installments subject to no losses or major reductions in exposure (20% increase in insured value.) Crime In 2018 we marketed your policy to Hanover and Travelers. The County decided to remain with Hanover and opted for another three year term with annual installments. The installment due at this time is $5,005. Indian River County Board of County Commissioners ::: CORE360" Public Entity Excess Liability Brit has offered a renewal premium of $151,825 which is a $1,475 decrease from expiring. Brit offered a rate agreement for in 2018 for the 2019 renewal subject various terms and conditions which the County met. The only major change to the policy was mid-term we added liability coverage for drones. Brit will continue to offer loss control funds, this is a cost sharing arrangement and they will reimburse you 50% of the total cost up to $3,000. The services have to be pre -approved in order for the County to receive a refund. As discussed during the pre -renewal the County consider signing up for the TEAM Platform which offers safety and HR trainings for your employees. Brit continues to require Johns Eastern to follow their TPA guidelines to address how they expect them to manage and communicate claims. Excess Workers Compensation The Excess Workers Compensation market continues to be limited in Florida for entities that have Police and/or Fire exposures which are subject to presumption laws. As a result many entities our forced to take spit retentions with Police/Fire retentions of $750,000 to $1 million. In 2015, we were successful in negotiating $650,000 retention for all classifications except $1 million for USL&H and Jones Act. In 2016 we negotiated on your behalf a flat rate with Safety as well as a rate agreement for 2017, 2018 and 2019. The renewal premium is $171,468; a $252 increase. Please note the payroll did go down by 5%. The renewal was not quoted flat due to an increased in exposure; adding a fourth helicopter. The helicopter was obtained in May 2018 however was not reported until this renewal. Cyber / Excess Cyber Liability In 2014 the County purchased Cyber Liability with AIG. This year AIG has offered three options: 1. Expiring limit $1,000,000 with expiring terms and conditions — renewal premium $19,100; a $343 decrease 2. Expiring limit $1,000,000 with coverage enhancements — premium $27,522 ($8,422 additional premium) 3. Limit $3,000,000 with coverage enhancements — premium $42,829 ($23,729) AIG has made the following material changes to the renewal terms and conditions: Form Option 2 & 3 Option 1 NA Network Interruption waiting hours 10 hours Network Interruption waiting hours 12 Hours 129376 Updated GDPR Endorsement — broader now includes for wrongful New form included 06/18 collection 125872 Reputation Based Income Loss Coverage Endorsement —14 day No Coverage 07/17 waiting period — Provides coverage for adverse publicity as a result of an actual or alleged security failure or privacy event - Sublimit provided equals half the Event Management 129607 Material Interruption Definition Amended Endorsement — Adds to Coverage provided only for 07/18 Network Interruption Coverage to the definition of material network interruption that is interruption a voluntary shutdown. This would be when you considered material — which voluntary or intentionally shutdown your computer system under means the interruption is the ownership, operation or control of the insured, by or at the measurable and is caused direction of the Chief Information Security Officer of the insured, after the discovery of a security failure, with reasonable belief that such shutdown would limit the loss directly by a security failure 131159 Loss Definition Amended Endorsement — provides carve back for Excludes fine and penalties 11/18 fines and penalties imposed by governmental agency arising from if uninsurable by law of the Regulatory Action, where insurable by applicable law jurisdiction 117896 Privacy Event Services Coverage endorsement (affected person Current coverage is capped 05/14 limit) = Provides coverage for notification, call centers and credit monitoring up to 1,000,000 max individuals; 100 minimum at policy limit 7 Indian River County Board of County Commissioners =:=CORE360" Form Option 2 & 3 Option 1 Difference individuals and is not subject to the limit on the policy. Property 123143 Impersonation Fraud Coverage Section — Provides coverage for No coverage within current 01/17 fraudulently -induced instruction by means of electronic, telegraphic, cable, teletype, fax, phone or written instruction Cyber Form — Crime policy currently has $ 10,742.00 directing financial institution to transfer funds from a transfer $50,000 with a $5,000 Inland Marine account, communicated by the insured or your employee upon the insured or your employee was fraudulently instructed who appears to authorized by your company or a vendor for $100,000 excess of deductible $ 7,403.00 $25,000 deductible Terrorism Liability 124318 Other Insurance Clause Amended Endorsement Insured Option — Policy reads Excess 08/17 Overlapping Property Policy Coverage — Allows insured to choose if duplicated coverage which policy will respond first $ 7,275.00 Watercraft — Hull / Protection & Indemnity The renewal premium offered by Great America is $7,808; a flat renewal. General Liability — Parking Lot This year we moved the Parking lot General Liability policy to a May 15t renewal to run con -current with the other policies we place on your behalf. A flat renewal of $1,888.00; 4.45% decrease. The carrier had one change to the policy amending the definition of "insured contract." This change is important as it the policy will no longer provide coverage for damage to the parking lot. You should review your contract and let us know if your required to provide property damage liability or just bodily injury liability. It may not specify. County overview of expiring vs. renewal program for all coverages Below you will find an expiring vs. renewal premium summary: Coverage 18-19 Premium 19-20 Premium Difference % Change Property $ 1221,337.00 $ 1,326,994.00 $ 105,656.50 8.65% Equipment Breakdown $ 10,890.00 $ 10,742.00 $ (148.00) -1.36% Inland Marine $ 59,790.00 $ 67,193.00 $ 7,403.00 12.38% Terrorism Liability $ 11,500.00 $ 11,122.00 $ (378.00) -3.29% NCBR Terrorism $ 7,275.00 $ 6,685.00 $ (590.00) -8.11% Pro.ert Terrorism $ 9,500.00 $ 8,729.00 $ 771.00 -8.12% Crime $ 5,005.00 $ 5,005.00 $ - 0.00% Public Entity Excess Liability $ 153,300.00 $ 151,825.00 $ (1,475.00) -0.96% Excess Workers Compensation $ 171,216.00 $ 171,468.00 $ 252.00 0.15% Cyber $ 19,443.00 $ 27,522.00 $ $8,079 41.55% Hull / P&I $ 7,808.00 $ 7,808.00 $ - 0.00% General Liability — Parking Lot $ 1,976.00 $ 1,888.00 $ (88.00) -4.45% Fee $ 175,000.00 $ 175,000.00 $ - 0.00% TOTAL $ 1,854,040.00 $ 1,971,980.50 $ 117,940.50 6.36% Conclusion We look forward to reviewing this proposal with you in detail and truly appreciate your business. In the following pages we will review the results, changes, enhancements and options by each line of coverage: Michael Gillon Area President Erica Connick, ARM -P Area Senior Vice President 1 Gallagher Insurance I Risk Management ( Consulting INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA MEMORANDUM /2F/ DEPARTMENTAL TO: Jason E. Brown, County Administrator FROM: Richard B. Szpyrka, P.E., Public Works Director SUBJECT: Request for Waiver of Bid Requirements for Paving Services from All Paving DATE: April 11, 2019 DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS On March 21, 2017, the Board approved the award of the Annual Bid for Asphalt Paving and Resurfacing to Community Asphalt Corp. for a term of one year with the option for two one-year renewals, subject to satisfactory performance, vendor acceptance, and the determination by Public Works that renewal of this annual bid is in the best interest of Indian River County. In March of 2018, Purchasing issued the first of the two one-year extensions of the Annual bid. Staff was preparing to move forward with the second renewal of the Annual Bid when Public Works was notified by Community Asphalt's primary subcontractor, All Paving, that they had not been paid by Community Asphalt for numerous County projects. Public Works staff and Purchasing reached out to Community Asphalt for information regarding this issue, but we have not been provided with information to address our concerns. All Paving has since suspended work for Community Asphalt due to non-payment. Community Asphalt has not responded to a request to provide a financial statement for staff to evaluate in consideration of an extension. As such, on March 31, 2019 the Annual Bid for Paving and Resurfacing contract with Community Asphalt expired, as staff was not willing renew the contract without Community Asphalt addressing non-payment to the subcontractor. All Paving has been providing paving services to the County as a subcontractor to Community Asphalt and has been performing well. This work includes a Public Works paving project in the Florida Ridge area, which is partially complete, and has been halted due to the expiration of the Community Asphalt contract. All Paving has provided a cost estimate of $79,155 to finish the project. Staff is requesting that the Board waive the requirement for bids and authorize the Purchasing Division to issue a purchase order in the amount of $79,155 to All Paving to complete the project. A new Annual Bid for Asphalt Paving and Resurfacing is being finalized and will be advertised to facilitate necessary work going forward. FUNDING Funding available in the amount of $79,155 in Secondary Roads/Roads and Bridges/Road Resurfacing Acct No. 10921441- 053360. RECOMMENDATIONS Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners waive the requirement for bids for this project and authorize the Purchasing Division to issue a purchase order in the amount of $79,155 to All Paving for completion of the paving project in Florida Ridge. ATTACHMENTS Quote from All Paving APPROVED AGENDA ITEM FOR April 23, 2019 C:\Users\Iegistar\AppData\Local\Temp\BCL Technologies\easyPDF 8\@BCL@880E27BB\@BCL@880E27BB.doc 136 ALL Paving Offices: Lauderdale Jupiter Maples Orlando Tampa 0 1-888-439-ROAO 301 Indian River County �P,roject' ATTN:Jeff Hoffman 4550 41st Street Vero Beach, Florida. 32960 OFC: (772) 770-0483 CELL: (772) 713-0483 EMAIL: jhoffman c(�.ircgov.com Florida Ridge Paving Project 4550 41st Street Vero Beach, Florida. 32960 Florida Ridge Paving LISTED SERVICES Asphalt Paving - 750 Tons Preparation and cleaning of surface area Apply D.O.T. approved tack coat to surface Apply 1" of D.O.T. approved SP 9.5 hot mix asphalt Asphalt will be 1" after compaction with a 3-5 ton vibratory roller. Re -roll with an asphalt tire (rubber) roller $96.00 Per ton $2.50 Per Gallon (Included in Price_ ALL Paving Offices: Ft_ Jupefet Naples, Orlando, Tampa o 14188 -439, -ROAD MOT Setup MOT Lane Closure per index 603 $1,602.00 ALL Paving Offices: Lauderdale, Jupiter, Naples, Orlando Tampa 0 1 -888 -439 -ROAD P..roject' Florida Ridge Paving THANK YOU FOR THE OPPORTUNITY TO SUBMIT THIS QUOTATION. Grand Total: $79,155.00 If you have any questions or concerns please feel free to contact us! gsi ALL Pavin Daren Daly, JD I AtlPaving.com Cell: 954-234-6381 Chief Operating Officer Toll Free: 9-888-439-ROA'D Email: Daren@AIIPaving.com Offices Lauderdale, Jupiter, Naples, Orlando, e Tampa FDOT dQ ICC f S+ All Pay] ng.com ALL Paving Offices: Ft_ Lauderdale, Jupiter, Naples, Orlando Tampa Q 1 -888 -439. -ROAD Florida Ridge Paving Acceptance of proposal; We would like to thank you for the opportunity to visit your property and the possibility to earn your project and business. We are committed to providing our customers with great service and workmanship on all of our projects. Our commitment to customers is why we always Warranty our projects and stand behind our work. To proceed with our proposal please sign the area below and return a copy either electronically to your estimator on the project to our office at infoalloaving.com. Name Company/Community Address City State/Province Zip/Postal Code Telephone Fax Email Method of Payment El Check made payable to All Paving enclosed for. $ Signature Date Paving °Wices:[�Lauderdale Jupiter Naples Orlando Tampa U1-888-4139-ROAD General Terms and Conditions WARRANTY: • All Paving Inc. guarantees all work performed for up to two years from completion (Sealcoating is good for one year.) • All Paving Inc. will not be responsible for damaged caused by individuals entering the construction zone once area is marked and barricaded. • New Asphalt Overlay warranty is dependent upon existing foundation. • All Paving cannot guarantee 100% drainage in areas where the design grade is less than 1% fall. • Hiring party is responsible for blueprints, plans, engineering, layout, testing, bonds and as -built by others. • License and Insured U22269,17 -3B -20781-X WORK TERMS: • It is understood and agreed that all work is performed "weather permitting". • This proposal is based on work being completed during the hours of 7:OOAM and 5:OOPM, Monday through Friday, excluding holidays and weekends. • Cars parked in the work area are the responsibility of the owner and delays will be billed at $250.00/ per hour. • Owner agrees to pay asphalt over -runs at $125.00 per ton if leveling is required for surface drainage or low-lying areas. PERMITTING • Permit fees billed as actual. • Expediting fees billed in addition to the cost of permit: Broward- $250 minimum. Other Counties - $500 minimum. • This proposal does not include the cost of permit fees, inspection fees or impact fees which may be required from the various agencies or municipalities having jurisdiction. • If Owner/Authorized Agent directs this work to be completed without required permitting, all costs including, but not limited to, fees, expediting and fines are the responsibility of the Owner/Authorized Agent. • 90% of contract amount and change orders must be paid prior to completing punch list items and/or any changes for additional work required by cities or municipalities. PAYMENT: • Change orders, additions or extras requested by Owner, Contractor or Municipality will be invoiced as an addition to the contract and shall not delay payment of the original contract sum. • The prices used in this proposal are based on the condition that all work quoted will be accepted in total, • 50% Deposit is due upon signed contract. • 30% Is due upon Day 1 of work. • 18% is due at completion • 2% Percent of the contract amount may be withheld until permits are closed without. • A Notice to Owner will be filed on this project according to Florida Statute. • Any unpaid balance after thirty (30) days after receipt of invoice shall bear interest from that date forward at 10% per month • Owner is responsible for all collections fees and expenses DISCLAIMERS: • Conflicts with irrigation, electrical and utilities are to be repaired by owners at their expense. • This proposal, including all terms and conditions, shall become a legally binding attachment to any contract entered into between All Paving Inc. and the financially responsible company for which the work will be performed. • The parties agree and consent that the terms stated herein are a full and complete integration of material terms are contained herein and no previous terms, oral or written, that are not contained herein are excluded intentionally. • In the event of a dispute regarding this contract, the financially responsible party for which the work is performed agrees to pay reasonable attorney fees, collection costs and all related costs incurred until such dispute is settled. • In the event of a dispute regarding this contract, the proper venue is the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit of Florida in and for Palm Beach County, Florida. • This contract shall be governed by, and construed and enforced in accordance with, the internal laws in effect in the State of Florida. Departmental Item INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF UTILITY SERVICES Date: April 12, 2019 To: Jason E. Brown, County Administrator From: Vincent Burke, P.E., Director of Utility Services Prepared By: John M. Boyer, P.E., Utilities Engineer Arjuna Weragoda, P.E., Capital Projects Manager Subject: John's Island Water Management Reclaimed Water Project - Permitting Status DESCRIPTIONS AND CONDITIONS: John's Island Water Management (JIWM), Inc., is a Florida not-for-profit corporation whose address is 1 Turtle Beach Road, Vero Beach, Florida 32963. JIWM has provided, and continues to provide, irrigation supply to the residents and golf courses within the Town of Indian River Shores (IRS). JIWM, in looking to diversify its fresh water irrigation supply, approached the Indian River County Department of Utility Services (IRCDUS) in 2016 to inquire about the possibility of providing 1 million gallons per day (1 MGD) of reclaimed water (a.k.a. "reuse water") for irrigation purposes. As part of the signed agreement on December 5, 2017, JIWM submitted a Utilities Construction Permit (UCP) application to IRCDUS on or about January 19, 2018, through their engineering consultant, Knight McGuire Associates (KMA) for the construction of a 16 -inch reclaimed water transmission main. ANALYSIS: The permit documents depict approximately 21,000 linear feet (If) of 16 -inch diameter reuse water main, including approximately 5,200 If of horizontal directional drill (HDD) below the Indian River Lagoon. The proposed 16 -inch reclaimed water main will connect to an existing 16 -inch reclaimed water main at the intersection of 77th Street and Old Dixie Highway, run south along Old Dixie Highway to 69th Street, and east under US Highway 1 along 69thStreet to the Indian River Lagoon. The subaqueous alignment of the proposed HDD runs between the east end of 69th Street, below Hole in the Wall Island and Pine Island, to the OId Winter Beach Bridgehead Park at the west end of OId Winter Beach Road (OWBR). The proposed reuse main then continues on to John's Island via OId Winter Beach Road and south along Highway A1A. Note the OWBR portion of the reuse main has already been installed. Out of an abundance of caution, and due to the technically complex and environmentally sensitive nature of the subaqueous portion of this project, IRCDUS reached out to engineering firm Brierley Associates for a peer review of the proposed subaqueous bore design. Brierley Associates has extensive knowledge and experience in large -diameter, long-distance horizontal directional drilling. In the time since, KMA has retained the services of an HDD expert and has worked to address the comments issued by both Brierley Associates and IRCDUS staff. As of this agenda, there are still pending items that need to be addressed before IRCDUS can issue the UCP. C:\Users\I egista r\Ap pData\Loca I\Temp\BCL Technologies\easyPDF 8\@BCL@ 280E3985\@BCL@ 280E3985.docx 142 Departmental Item On February 15, 2019, IRCDUS staff issued a request for additional information to KMA, including comments from both Brierley Associates and IRCDUS staff. To date, KMA has not submitted a response. FUNDING: Funds for the John's Island Water Management Reclaimed Water Project Permit Review are derived from the Other Professional Services account in the operating fund. Operating fund revenues are generated from water and sewer sales. Note these funds have already been encumbered. Description Account Number Amount Other Professional Services 471-23536-033190 $15,347.43 If the BCC decides to move forward with this project, then staff will bring an agenda item back to the Board for approval for additional funding for IRCDUS infrastructure upgrades required for the reclaimed water requested byJIWM and Construction Engineering Inspection (CEI) assistance. RECOMMENDATION: This is only an update of the status of the Utility Construction Permit to the Indian River County Board of County Commissioners, and no decision is requested of this item. C:\Users\legistar\AppData\Local\Temp\BCL Technologies\easyPDF 8\@BCL@280E3985\@BCL@280E3985.docx 143 Indian River County Board of County Commissioners Meeting April 23, 2019 • History Permits Crossings I. Benefits Summary lo 2016 Johns Island Water Management (JIWM) requested reclaimed water to be supplied by Indian River County Department of Utility Services (IRCDUS) m 12/5/2017 BCC approved 25 -year agreement with JIWM m 02/20/2018 Town of IRS Franchise Agreement with IRC I. 2016 -Present JIWM began permitting process for a subaqueous pipeline m 01/19/2018 Knight McGuire Associates submitted Utility Construction Permit (UCP) to IRCDUS m 02/15/2019 UCP additional information requested m 04/22/2019 Additional information Submitted Proposed Route 1 92O1 13e14/0, ii/ozo USACOE Issued SAJ-2017-01558 NWP12_03 19 17 11. SJ RWM D Issued 18846-3 FDEP ERP Pending 31-0357074-001 IRC UCP Pending UCP # 4143. Additional info needed. IRC R/W Pending ROW # TBD. Multiple changes since PW received August 2018 plans. February 8, 2019, FDEP letter to JIWM: Page 1 FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF Emironmental Protection NEWEST anA uaTmxrcx. (k.1, Sle arms rust xaRa.m_C^cnm C 1. bela Pew he. par et many etzno.a.a4r .1W es yom I et tor m•PasetYllswess.2e.sepael res. As lee♦ Hots a eke bw be*es .1:17. tme(x .Itas P.+.....*RO PnaleimeRe..�tw. it. ba..er aepuv..Ite ..e.(,bay.x agree s. WTm TWTFCewbm ..ern Ctr w..aRMLmfTmYaµea IR.+61,017 MC. t,....011.0.MRm'.Rmax�rq If the County asserts that they have the ROW ** across these two islands, then please submit a construction easement for Hole in The Wall Island and Pine Island granting Johns Island Water Management, the real property interest, to install the pipeline within/below this ROW. If the County decides against asserting the ROW across the islands, please submit the proposed construction easements from the Mosquito Control District, the owner of Hole in The Wall Island, and Lost Tree Village Corporation, the owner of Pine Island, to Johns Island Water Management. Additionally, submit appropriate easements from each property owner of the islands to Indian River County for the perpetual operation and maintenance of the pipeline ** April 23, 2019, Agenda item 13.A. under County Attorney's matters February 8, 2019 FDEP letter to JIWM: Page 2 Johns Island Water Management Page 2 oft FeMmay S. 2019 To =name the processing of your application the Depatvea t oral =sive a response aith'm 90 days of this letter unless a written raping for additional ebur to f6OVideVle requested idonuation 11 submitted and approved Pursuant to Chapter 62-330 and Section 120.60 F S., failure of n applicant to onside timely requested inf.:moon M -t a apphom doQice may result in denial of the app:emion. If}aahxxany goekiemt,Please nomad Monica So:acool at 561481-669$orbye-mail at Morn. SovmoolTfloridaDEP.Foc. Smeetely, Diane Pupa Prop am Adoemstrotm Permitting and Waste Ckany Somteasi District cc- MEP— Monica Sosxaol, Dae Pupa. Chis Welles David Knight - Knight Maguire 8 A.csoaales. Jtt dasisal7echbfm resaa Vincent &nix— lndiao Rises Courts- Utilities Direcrm, sfirrkC$irrumr cos To continue the processing of your application, the Department must receive a response within 90 days of this letter unless a written request for additional time to provide the requested information is submitted and approved. Pursuant to Chapter 62- 330 and Section 120.60, F.S., failure of an applicant to provide timely requested information by the applicant deadline may result in denial of the application. Date Issued: February 8, 2019 90 days: May 09, 2019* * Extension possible Stakeholders CP J I POA • JIWM • EOR: • HDD Engineer: • Environmental Consultant: • Hydrogeologic Consultant: John's Island Property Owners Association Mr. Korpar, Mr. Nelson, Mr. Moller David Knight, PE, Knight McGuire Associates, Inc. Juan Barraneche, PE Southern Underground Industries Hobe Sound Environmental Consultants, Inc. JLA Geosciences, Inc. w Stakeholders • Wildlife/ Environment • Concerned citizens • Town of Indian River Shores • COVB • Neighbors • Barrier Island residents • County Residents • Sea Oaks/ Sea Oaks Property Owners Association • NGOs (CWC/ MRC) • Indian River County - Board of County Commissioners o Utilities Department - Jim Williams, PE: Subject Matter Expert - Joe Schulke, SBS o Public Works o Community Development • Agencies • FDEP, SJRWMD, USACOE, FDOT lw Risk m Technically Difficult m Geologic Fault I. Noise m Protected Species I. Frack out w Spills/Breaks 1. Benefits m IRL ow Water Quality I. Alternative Routing HDD "Fact Sheet" Drilling Fluid • HDD uses water-based drilling fluids • Typically contains bentonite and other additives • Usually possible to use all NSF -approved materials • Non-toxic but turbidity can be harmful to some species Bentonite • Also known as Wyoming Bentonite or Sodium Bentonite • Naturally -occurring fine clay material formed by the decomposition of volcanic ash •, Used for drilling mud, cat litter, cosmetics and other uses Unique due to high absorption and swelling properties • NSF -60 Certification • Product meet the regulatory requirement of US EPA and FL DEP for drinking water • Certification process included toxicity testing and evaluation Common Additives • • Needed to enhance specific properties of fluid — viscosity, lubricity, gel strength, filtration, etc. PAC — polyanionic cellulose polymer Filtration control Derived from plant material Also used in foods, pharmaceutical, leather, ceramic and other industries Used in water treatment plants Usually NSF approved and non-toxic HDD "Fact Sheet" Risk of Inadvertent Release (IR) or `Frac-Out' • Depends on geology and geotechnical characteristics and drilling methods and procedures • Sandysoils are usually better due to greater strength, measured by friction angle • Mitigating Strategies • Design considers geology and geotechnical characteristics • Estimate formation limit pressure • Estimate drilling pressure • Drill with pressure instrument — real-time downhole measurement • •bmpare real-time with estimated pressure — allows adjustment before IR occurs Casing pipe at each end to protect near -surface soils and features Intersect Pilot Hole — Drill from both sides to reduce drilling pressure • Divers to monitor within river Risk of Leak or Damage to Pipe and Ability to Repair Damage is very unlikely — almost always during construction or testing before being placed into operation Pipe can be monitored for Teaks or damage Pressure Testing (305 psi/ 150/ 80) Repairs can be achieved by: • Sliplining — Pull a smaller pipe through damaged pipe • Excavation - If depth is shallow and on land HDD "Fact Sheet" Geologic Anomalies Fault — Presence not confirmed, more likely a dissolution and subsidence feature • Fault or dissolution/subsidence "will have no impact" on the HDD project (JLA Geosciences, Inc.) Sinkholes — Uncommon in the project area • In this area "Sinkholes are few, shallow, of small diameter, and develop gradually." (USGS) • No known sinkholes in project area 'Industry Experience - HDD • In the past 10 years, 4,000+ ft. HDD crossings have become routine • Number of 4,000 + ft. HDD Crossings: Estimated to be many thousands • Number of 4,000 + ft. FPVC: 20 Fusible PVC Pipe • 16" DR14 AWWA C-900 Pipe • Previous successful HDD installations of 7,000' and 6,600' • Port St. Lucie: 2 @ 7,000' HDD of 32" diameter pipe • 'Safe' or 'Allowable' tensile capacity of 176,000 lbs. • Lab tested to 380,000 lbs. tensile limit HDD "Fact Sheet" Location of Pipe • Guidance systems for pilot hole are very accurate (ParaTrack 2: ±2%) • Surface casing will control location near surface • Can be surveyed after pipe installation if exact location is critical Vibration • Below noticeable level unless within ±20' of the drill rig (vibration from diesel engine ) • Soft soils usually do not transmit vibration created by drilling Noise • Like all construction, elevated sound levels are produced by equipment • Sound barriers greatly reduce noise impacts • Common industry practice to install sound barriers Existing IRL Crossings 6 COV B 2 IRC 3FPL 4 Detail"8" _ 20" Water;Main,.'' iOvirier COVB` HDD Crossings of Significance io Significant • Sensitivity of location: River, estuary, wetland • Size: Diameter and/or Length of bore List of Significant HDD Crossing Projects Location No. City/Region State Length Diameter Comments Material 12 Port St. Lucie FL 7020 32 Line A FPVC 13 Port St. Lucie FL 7020 32 Line B FPVC 14 Green Cove Springs FL 7390 16 Steel 15 Miami FL 5917 8 Steel 16 Miami FL 5013 8 Steel 17 Miami FL 5188 8 Steel 18 Key West FL 2800 16 Bundle Pull (2x8 & 3x6) HDPE 19 Panama City FL 4500 24 FPVC 20 St. Petersburg FL 4000 24 FPVC 21 Daytona Beach FL 2385 30 FPVC 22 Jacksonville FL 4000 30 Steel 23 Jacksonville FL 6500 36 Steel 24 Jacksonville FL 3500 8 Steel 25 Jacksonville FL 4000 42 Steel 26 Jacksonville FL 3600 8 Steel 27 Tampa FL 2000 20 FPVC 28 Largo FL 2550 20 FPVC 29 Bay County FL 2400 30 FPVC 30 New Smyrna Beach FL 2300 6 Bundle Pull (3 x 6") FPVC 31 Bradenton FL 2200 20 FPVC 32 Sarasota FL 2900 14 FPVC 33 Destin FL 2000 30 FPVC 34 Sun City Center FL 2120 30 FPVC 35 Naples FL 3350 20 FPVC 36 Sarasota FL 2120 16 FPVC 37 Orange Park FL 3000 20 FPVC • 80 HDD Crossings of Significance • 26 are in Florida • Mr. Williams had involvement in most examples North American Society for Trenchless Technology (NAST7) NASTT's 2017 No -Dig Show Washington. D.C. April 9-12, 2017 MM -T2-04 Record Setting Dual Casing Crosses Indian River by HDD Jim Williams, P1 Mears (irony, Houston, TX Mike Muelkr, P1?, Pours Engineers, Sr. f ouis. MO Ron Haldeman, PE. pears Group, H0124100, TX Tom Nanta Underground Solonms. Poway, CA Sara Maloney. Underground Saharans, Poway, CA BKS RACT 111 The Indian Riser trolling project was one portion of a I3.65•milc alrfmned lin new, redirattam 230 kV tmdert7nuM ekcutc transmission hoes. Mulhpk installation methods were required throughout Ibc projcck including open net trench raasstion. dere miermunnels, and fuse separate hors)Antal directional drills. Of the installations, the mop significant and technically challenging nem the record breaking dual 7,020.foos Indian Riser casing 00.9iinp installed using horirmtal directional drilling, The casing for this hnslalbnon needed to he noo-conduetne, safe, and economical. Installation had to be as mimrnally dismptise m possible as the gripe would be aerially navigated through 900 -feet of gummed mangrove and floated a,500 fen through a lagoon. The casing used was 32 -inch DR21 fusible n 4cMoe de pipe inserted ileo a 46inch rearmed bore !role, completed using imams -et drilling by o 1,100,000 pound capacity I11)D rig and a ,nulkr 140.000 pound ng, The ehalknges of the assembly, handling, and inatallstion of die two 383 toe casings, the full scale testing of the 30 - inch in',emal diomna rut itys. and the one to measurement of drag form to email intermediate fusion tenpin. arc discussed. 2. INTRODUCTION The unstable nature 01 mere meths runs comers to the need 10 increase Ow 0sblhty of the national power tgrply. In arras that regularly face severe wea•JKr, such a, hurricanes, tornados, and oanlgwkes. maintaining access to e steady source Of power Is intperatisc. A lack of ties -mirky can hamper relief and recovery cfforn while tapered clowned liner can be an additional suoee of danger, By increasing sedund*ney in then delivery burs, power companies are able to provide improved smioe lo their customers in an increased number of ps lootlalty dangerous siluatio•,R. An area that Is particularly susceptible to severe wanks is the peninsular state of Florida. Both coags ate regularly 'armed by '$unmoor mason" and can suffer significant damage to both public and prime propeny each time severe weather systems pus through. elm damage may nem from high winds. floodin. o combination of the Iwo. Paper UM -T2-04 . 1 Record Setting Dual Casing Crosses Indian River by HDD Dual Bores 7,020 Feet Under IRL 46 inch Bore Hole 32 inch DR21 FPVC pipe 900 feet protected Mangrove 2016 Trenchless Tech New Install Project of the Year FPL FPL: Dual 7,020 feet JIWM: 5,680 feet 'FPL Reamed Bore Hole: 46 inch x2 JIWM Reamed Bore Hole: 26 inch x 1 FPL vs JIWM Bore Length 23.6% longer Ream Diameter: 76.9% larger Drawings Not To Scale (NTS) - Shown for general purposes Treatment Process Wastewate Primary Treatment 1"__1 Secondary _ Advanced Treatment Treatment 1 t,......_ 1 1 Disinfection Reclaimed Water Sludge Treatment, Use or Disposal nfluent v. Effluent 250 200 0) E 150 0 T72 100 0 c 0 50 Wastewater Treatment Facility Influent vs Treated Reclaimed Water Effluent V Total Nitrogen Total Phosphorus Biochemical Oxygen Demand Total Suspended Solids Wastewater Influent 60.7 6.6 225 217 • Reuse Water 5.5 0.34 2 1 Indian River County Wastewater Treatment Facilities Total Nitrogen Total Phosphorus CBOD Total Suspended Solids 1 MGD Reclaimed Water sent to John's Island Annual Daily Averages (mg/L) 5.5 0.34 2 1 (lbs/day) 45.87 2.84 16.68 8.34 Tertiary treatment and disinfection of wastewater at IRCDUS Wastewater Treatment Facilities provides a high degree of treatment which reduces levels of Nitrogen and Phosphorus beyond those that are required by regulation for the Water Reuse Program (Florida Administrative Code 62-610). Annual Average Influent and Effluent concentrations, along with a flow rate of 1 MGD are depicted in graphs above. Benefits of Reuse Irrigation versus surface water discharge 10 Additional Reuse Water avoids use of potable or ground water for irrigation • Maximizing the use of reclaimed water with a diversified selection of alternative sources can help stretch traditional freshwater supplies (i.e. UFA) Address IRCDUS' water conservation plan Reduce saline intrusion I. Implement IRCDUS' Septic to Sewer plan SJRWMD supports the expansion of reuse systems I. Per SJRWMD, this is the most environmentally beneficial solution to reduce nutrient loading, to help offset future water supply needs and to provide for Tong -term growth in the area. High- quality groundwater supplies may not be able to meet all future needs Benefits of Reuse Public reuse Golf course Other direct systems irrigation reuse reuse Wastewater Treatment and Reuse in SJRWMD, 2017 Percentage of total treated flow Groundwater recharge n n 0 Public reuse systems Golf course irrigation reuse Other direct reuse Groundwater recharge Surface water discharge Other disposal Surface water Other disposal discharge 117.72 mgd 36.12 mgd 31.23 mgd 31.96 mgd 143.94 mgd 2937 mgd • mod =million gallons per day . Other direct muse Indudes edible and other communal crops, MIA gushing. COrranarclal car washing, an protectInn. IMuserbl, etc . Groundwater mdurg• Mdudes perwlatlon ponds, rapid Meltration bairns And absorption gelds In recharge areas. .Omer disposal lncudsspercolation ponds, rapid infiltration basins and absorption buds In discMro• etas, spray haldsand deep watt mlactfon. Public reuse systems Golf course irrigation reuse Other direct reuse Wastewater Treatment and Reuse in Indian River County, 2017 Percentage of total treated flow Groundwater recharge Public reuse systems Golf course Irrigation reuse Other direct reuse Groundwater recharge Surface water discharge Other disposal Surface water Other disposal discharge 3.00 mgd 4.37 mgd 0.00 mgd 0.00 mgd 0.01 mgd 0.82 mgd . mod=m111on gallons per day • Otho direct rouse Includes edible and other aommardal crops, to/•t *ninny, commercial car washtng, am protection, industrial, etc • Groundwater recharge includes parmlaaon ponds, rapid Idfhration basins and absorption gelds In recharge areas. • Other disposal Includes percolation pond; rapid infitration badns and absorption gelds In discharge areas, spray herds and deep wen Infection. Ji) Reclaimed Water and Florida's Water Reuse Programs Appro, mately 663 million gallons of reclaimed water is used every day in Florida (Florida Department of En ronmental Protection, 2009). Florida is a recognized leader in the use of reclaimed water and its reuse rogram was the first recipient of the United States Environmental Protection Agency Water Efficiency Leader Award in 2006. Encouraging and promoting reuse in Florida is a state objective for conserving freshwater supplies and preserving rivers, streams, lakes, and aquifers. 1 This document is AE448, one of a series of the Agricultural and Biological Engineering Department, Florida Cooperative Extension Service, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, University of Florida. Original publication date July 2009. Reviewed July 2012. Visit the EDIS website at http://edis.ifas.ufl.edu. Florida's population is expected to increase from 16 million in 1995 to 22 million by the year 2020 and freshwater needs are expected to grow from 8.2 to 9.1 billion gallons per day (Florida Council of 100, 2003). Currently a large percentage (40-60%) of potable water (drinking quality water) is used for non -potable needs such as landscape irrigation. Conservation measures such as irrigating with reclaimed water is one way to reduce the use of existing potable water supplies. Reusing water has several environmental benefits: • Reduced groundwater withdrawals; • Reduced need for new drinking water supplies such as new surface water withdrawals or desalination plants; • Reduced need for new drinking water infrastructure such as storage reservoirs, pipelines and water treatment plants; and • Improved water quality of the natural environment by reducing the amount of nutrients that are discharged directly to surface and groundwaters. SJRWMD: Reuse Week May 19-25, 2019 AGENDA REQUEST FOR GOVERNING BOARD MEETING April 9.2019 MEMORANDUM TO: Governing Board THROUGH: Ann 8. Shortelle, PhD. Executive iDirector FROM: Scott Laidlaw. Bureau Chief Bureau of Water Supply Planning SUBJECT: Declaration of the Third Week of May as Water Reuse Week RECOMMENDATION Approval of proclamation declaring May 19-25, 2019 as Florida Water Reuse Week, BACKGROUND Since 2007. the State of Ronda, the Department of Environmental Protection, water management diisUtcts, water utilities, bcaf governments and water -related organizations such as the WateReuse Association have declared the third week in May as "Florida Water Reuse Week' to promote and encourage efficient use of reclaimed water. The largest use for reclaimed water is irrigation and May is typically the month when irrigation demands peak due to hot and dry conditions. Reclaimed water provides a means for conserving and augmenting Florida's precious water resources and is key to meeting future demands. DISCUSSION Approval of this resolution demonstrates the District's continued support of the use and expansion of reclaimed water. This nem supports the District's core mission and strategic initiatives through maximizing the beneficial use of reclaimed water to offset potable water supplies and restore water levels and natural systems. Approval of this resolution demonstrates the District's continued support of the use and expansion of reclaimed water. This item supports the District's core mission and strategic initiatives through maximizing the beneficial use of reclaimed water to offset potable water supplies and restore water levels and natural systems. UCP # 4143 Remaining Items m Reference: February 15, 2019 comment letter. 1. Hydraulic Analysis (revised per comments, signed & sealed) 2. Water Hammer Analysis (revised per comments, signed & sealed) 3. Additional soil borings 4. Additional information regarding the A1A right of way 5. Jurisdictional Permits: o FDOT Utility (US 1 and A1A) o FDEP ERP (Subaqueous Crossing) 6. Inadvertent Returns Contingency Plan 7. Spill Prevention, Control, and Countermeasure (SPCC) Plan 8. Hydro -fracture Calculations (revised per comments, signed & sealed) 9. HDD Design Calculations (revised per comments, signed & sealed) 10. HDD Construction Specification update 11. Construction Plans UCP # 4143 Remaining Items ▪ Attached to Permit: • Inadvertent Returns Contingency Plan; • Spill Prevention, Control, and Countermeasure (SPCC) Plan; • Hydro -fracture Calculations; • HDD Design Calculations; • HDD Construction Specification; and • Construction Plans Condition of Permit: • Construction Oversight: In addition to typical EOR construction oversight and certification, the Applicant will also be required to have an HDD Expert (PE, registered in Florida) provide additional construction oversight for the subaqueous HDD. HDD Expert shall be responsible to ensure the contractor's means and methods comply with the HDD design, and to address issues that may arise during construction of the HDD. • Provision of access easement over John's Island private roadways for maintenance of IRC -owned facilities. Asset transfer m w No transfer will occur until all conditions of the UCP have been met N. Satisfactory installation, site restoration w Satisfactory pressure testing I. Formalized close out: • As -Built information/record drawings true and correct • Bill of sale • No liens or encumbrances • Grants of easements • Maintenance bond Timeline/ Summary im Determination of ROW • Issuance of Temporary Construction Easement 11. Submittal to FDEP for review FDEP issuance of ERP • Note: Stakeholders have verbally stated the ERP will be challenged through the DOAH process: 11-12 months per FDEP N. Mosquito District/BCC agreement: F.S. 164 Process? UCP issues need to be settled IRC ROW permit still required Regular Agenda Item INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF UTILITY SERVICES Date: To: From: Prepared By: Subject: April 10, 2019 Jason E. Brown, County Administrator Vincent Burke, PE, Director of Utility Services Arjuna Weragoda, PE, Capital Projects Manager Barrier Island Reclaimed Water Main System Analysis - Results DESCRIPTIONS AND CONDITIONS: Indian River County Department of Utility Services (IRCDUS) has historically provided reclaimed water (a.k.a. reuse) to area golf courses for irrigation. As part of the February 24 2018, Reclaimed Water Franchise Agreement between the Town of Indian River Shores (Town) and Indian River County, there is a requirement for the County to study the feasibility of serving other Town communities with reclaimed water within three years. On December 11, 2018, the Indian River County Board of County Commissioners (BCC) approved Work Order No. 3 to Schulke, Bittle & Stoddard, LLC, (SBS) to perform an engineering feasibility analysis to run a reuse transmission main along the A1A corridor to a proposed storage and repump station at the Sea Oaks Wastewater Treatment Plant (SOWWTP) site. The primary goal of the evaluation was to look at the feasibility of constructing a reuse distribution and/or transmission main along the A1A corridor. Therefore, please note flow rates to the barrier island, distribution points, and tank siting are very preliminary and are based on numerous assumptions and could be subject to change. Currently, IRCDUS delivers reuse to numerous golf course sites, and the quantities vary depending on our disposal needs, their irrigation needs, and seasonal precipitation. ANALYSIS: The analysis primarily focused on the following three (3) tasks: • Existing Utility Locates • Hydraulic Modeling • Preliminary Opinion of Probable Cost Existing Utility Locates: Given the tight constraints of existing infrastructure within the A1A corridor, in order to accurately determine the feasibility of a reuse distribution and/or transmission main, SBS's sub- contractor performed extensive existing utility locates in, around, and under the A1A right-of-way corridor. SBS's sub -contractor physically located the existing underground utilities via pot holing. 144 Page 2 of 5 Hydraulic Modeling: As part of the analysis, several modeling scenarios were evaluated. Those scenarios are detailed in the report under Hydraulic Analysis. The hydraulic analyses were divided into four (4) specific scenarios based on existing and proposed flow rates. Scenario A — Current Delivery: These flows were based on a one year snap shot of what IRCDUS has delivered. Scenario B — Flows to Barrier Island Communities within the IRCDUS service area plus John's Island: The consultant evaluated all the existing Consumptive Use Permits (CUPs) within the IRCDUS service area and included the allocated amounts from the CUPs. For areas that did not have a CUP, the consultant assumed 1 million gallons per year to irrigate one acre. Also included in this scenario is the requested demand of 1 million gallons per day (mgd) for John's Island. These allocations are detailed under Appendix B of the report. Scenario C — Flows to Barrier Island Communities within the IRCDUS service area plus John's Island plus a portion of City of Vero Beach Service Area: The difference in this Scenario versus Scenario B is the addition of The Shores and Carlton River Club. Scenario D-- Maximum Capacity of System: In this scenario, minimum flows were allocated as done in Scenario C. The only difference is that additional demands were placed at different locations until system pressures fell below minimum criteria. The purpose of this scenario was to evaluate the maximum capacity that could be delivered given some of the existing infrastructure, proposed infrastructure, and proposed assumptions. The below graphical representation outlines the above scenarios. Graphical Representation of the Scenarios 5 4.5 4 j 3.5 L 2.5 < 2 1.5 1 0.5 0 MIMI WWI MO IMITL. Lri =I MMININIMMEININ A g Scenario c x North BI = JI % COVB D C:\Users\legistar\AppData\Local\Temp\BCL Technologies\easyPDF 8\@BCL@B80DD750\@ BCL@B80DD750.docx 145 Page 3 of 5 Preliminary Opinion of Probable Cost: The Engineering consultant performed a preliminary opinion of probable cost based on recent projects and industry pricing. The opinion of probable cost was broken into three (3) components as follows: • Proposed Transmission Main • Proposed Distribution Main • Proposed Storage and Re -pump Station Proposed Transmission Main: This portion of the project entails installing a 16 -inch reuse transmission main along the east side of A1A approximately 4,500 linear feet (LF) from the intersection of County Road (CR) 510 and A1A south to the existing SOWWTP (currently not in operation). The consultant's construction estimation for this portion is approximately $1.5 million. Proposed Distribution Main: The subject estimation was to run a 12 -inch reuse distribution and/or transmission main south from the SOWWTP to Old Winter Beach Road along the east side of A1A approximately 8,300 LF. The estimation for this portion is approximately $2.2 million. Although the consultant did not perform any utility locates, geotechnical information, and surveying data, they did compute an opinion of probable cost to run a 12 -inch reuse main from Old Winter Beach Road approximately 1000 LF south to Johns Island's existing pump station. The engineers estimated cost for this is an additional $219,000.00 Proposed Storage and Re -pump Station: Proposed installation of a three -million -gallon storage tank and pumping facilities within the inactive SOWWTP. The engineer's opinion of probable cost is approximately $3.1 million. The soft costs, which include fees associated with engineering, surveying, bidding, and construction engineering inspection, are approximately $485,875.00, or 7% of the total project cost. Pending the outcome of today's Indian River County Board of County Commissioners (BCC) decision(s), a preliminary schedule, subject to change, could look as follows: TASK DESCRIPTION ESTIMATED TIME 1 Procure Engineering Consultant 3 to 6 months from BCC direction 2 Biddable Contract Documents & Plans 6 to 8 months from notice to proceed 3 Recommend award of Contract 2 to 3 months from Task 2 completed 4 Begin Construction/Pre-Con 1 month from Task 3 completed 5 Substantial Completion 6 to 8 months after Task 4 6 Final Completion 1 to 2 months after Task 5 TOTAL ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION TIME FOR THE PIPE LINE 19 TO 27 MONTHS TOTAL ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION TIME FOR THE TANK 24 -MONTHS FROM NTP FOR CONSTRUCTION According to the consultant's evaluation of the A1A corridor, the constructability of a transmission and distribution main along the east side of A1A is feasible. As part of that investigation, the consultant C:\Users\legistar\AppData\Local\Temp\BCL Technologies\easyPDF 8\@BCL@ B8ODD750\@BCL@ B8ODD750.docx 146 Page 4 of 5 recommends the construction of a storage and re -pump facility. These facilities were also recommended in the 2004 and 2007 Master Plans. Furthermore, the Consultant recommends a phased approach where the first phase would install the transmission and distribution mains along A1A, and the second phase would construct the storage and pumping facility. Although IRCDUS staff can support a phased project, IRCDUS's goal is a long-term sustainable delivery of reclaimed water to the Barrier Island communities, thus a storage and re -pump solution is a necessary part of this project for operational efficiency and future deliveries. Keep in mind that this is a JIWM project, and while the BCC directed staff to research the viability of installing water mains along the A1A corridor, the following information in the report and agenda item is presented to assist the BCC in deciding which option may be the best path forward. However, the County does not have the ability to unilaterally choose the preferred route. Additionally, there may be limitations on the ability of JIWM to utilize the funding, already assessed for the subaqueous line, to be used instead for the A1A route, based on conversations between county staff and JIWM. Options for consideration: A1A Route: If the BCC decides to move forward with the A1A option after hearing the other items pertaining to the directional bore project under the Indian River Lagoon and the right-of-way issues associated with that project, then: 1. Direct staff to re -negotiate with John's Island for the A1A project cost, less the storage and re - pump facilities. The storage and re -pump facilities are not currently programmed in the Utilities capital improvement element. 2. Direct staff to work with Sea Oaks on the logistics and schedule of the storage and re -pump station. Note Sea Oaks property management is currently utilizing the inactive SOWWTF site to conduct daily management tasks. 3. Direct staff to negotiate surveying, design, bidding and construction services assistance contracts and prepare a Request for Qualifications (RFQ) package to solicit qualified consultants in order to comply with the Consultant's Competitive Negotiation Act (CCNA). An RFQ process will add approximately three to six months. Subaqueous Route: If the BCC decides to proceed with the sub -aqueous route, then this A1A study can be retained for future use. The subaqueous line will need to gain regulatory approval and all Utility Construction Permit (UCP) approvals not only before the construction begins, but while the construction occurs and post installation. If the installation is deficient or not up to acceptable horizontal directional drill (HDD) installation standards and/or County standards, then the transfer of assets cannot occur and IRCDUS may be unable to accept the operation and maintenance responsibilities. FUNDING: The Barrier Island Reuse water main feasibility was previously approved by the BCC for a total amount of $102,800.00 and was budgeted in the 472-169000-18532 account. If the project does not come to fruition, the Utility Capital Fund reserve expenses, associated with growth and expansion in the system, will have to be transferred to Other Professional Services in the operating fund. C:\Users\legistar\AppData\Local\Temp\BCL Technologies\easyPDF 8\@BCL@B80DD750\@BCL@B80DD750.docx 147 Page 5 of 5 The Subaqueous line will be funded by JIWM and will only be dedicated to the County upon successful completion of all regulatory agency approvals and Utility Construction Permit requirements. If the A1A route is considered, JIWM contribution would need to be negotiated /determined. If the A1A line project moves forward, a portion of the costs (storage tank/re-pump facility) would likely be funded by the Utilities Capital Fund. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Indian River County Board of County Commissioners consider the results of the A1A Barrier Island Reuse Water Main Feasibility Study. The report indicates that the east side of the A1A corridor is in fact feasible and cost -competitive with the subaqueous route. It is important to note that John's Island Water Management is constructing the subaqueous line, and while the County does not have the ability to unilaterally determine the routing of the proposed line, it does and will require the design and construction to meet or exceed industry standards as well as the County's utility construction requirements. ATTACHMENT(s): 1. Preliminary Engineering Report for the North IRC Barrier Island Reuse Water Storage and Pumping Facilities (47 Pages) 2. Plans for North County Reuse Water Main Study (22 Pages) C:\Users\legista r\AppData\Local\Temp\BCL Technologies\easyPDF 8\@BCL@ B80DD750\@ BCL@ B80DD750.docx 148 Preliminary Engineering Report for the North Indian River County Barrier Island Reuse Water Storage & Pumping Facilities Indian River County, Florida Ari 019 epared for: Indian River oun y o e •artment of Utility Services 1809 27th Street col Bea ch, Florida 32960 Prepared By: SCHULKE, BITTLE & STODDARD, L.L.C. CIVIL & STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING • LAND PLANNING • ENVIRONMENTAL PERMITTING 1717 Indian River Blvd, Suite 201 Vero Beach, FL 32960 (772) 770-9622 (772) 770-9496 Fax Joseph W. Schulke, P.E. FL #47048 149 Executive Summary Schulke, Bittle & Stoddard, LLC has been authorized by the Indian River County Department of Utility Services (IRCDUS) to prepare a report determining the feasibility to provide irrigation quality re-claimed water (Reuse Water) for the North Indian River County barrier island vicinity, including the feasibility to run new reuse water mains south on SR A -1-A, from CR 510 to Old Winter Beach Road, and the report will provide preliminary recommendations for the size and location of the reuse water transmission main and distribution mains in SR A -1-A, and size of storage tanks and pumping station(s) to be located at the Sea Oaks WWTP site. The Reuse system infrastructure is generally located along approximately 2.4 miles (12,720 If) of A -1-A, from CR 510 to Old Winter Beach Road. Feasibility to provide irrigation quality re-claimed water (Reuse Water) The reuse transmission and distribution mains contemplated with this preliminary engineering report and evaluation are proposed along SR A -1-A between CR 510 and Old Winter Beach Road. Right of way width is limited, and existing roadway and utility improvements limit the area available to install the reuse mains. Therefore, a detailed evaluation of the constructability of the reuse main was prepared, and it was determined that adequate area is available to install the proposed reuse mains along the east side of SR A -1-A using the directional bore method of pipe installatio Preliminary Recommendations: System specifications, size an•fl•w allocations This report provides an estimate of the potential maxim de . and fose water from all communities on the North barrier island, from Old Winter Beach Roa o to Windsor. This estimate approaches 4.2 MGD. However, the likely demand will be lower. Gosidering t at of the 4.2 MGD estimated demand, at least 2.25 MGD of this estimated demand comes from evelop► eats / communities within the COVB utility service area. Currently the COVB provides limite a oun of reuse water to several developments (including John's Island). Some existing de„ .elopme t specially those lying in the city's service area who may be able to refuse service, may notonnec�t to IRCDUS reuse water. This report also models and estimate D 'reuse i Fastructure capacity and has found that the reuse transmission system / pipe netw o TId •oten Tally deliver 4.34 MGD of reuse water (if available). However, actual capacity of th IRCflU re se system (the entire system) to deliver reuse water is likely lower. It will be many years efore the requisite quantity of reuse water is available from the county's three WWTP's. In addition, the capacit f theiobart reuse storage tank and pumping facility may be a limitation. The facility was designed to deli er GD with a 3.0 MG storage tank. Consider that if total barrier island demand reached 4.2 MGD, and a fisting mainland demand is 0.79 MGD (Redstick and JI West), the total demand from the Hobart facility could approach 5.0 MGD, or over 3 times its original design. Further, the transmission mains (double 12" parallel mains) that cross (and hang from) the Wabasso Bridge are older system components, and IRCDUS may not want these lines constantly running at peak capacity. It is SBS recommendation that IRCDUS plan to construct facilities that will provide for the future demand of at least 3.116 MGD of reuse water to the North Barrier Island. This flow allocation is depicted and listed in Scenario C in the Hydraulic modeling and is summarized as follows: -1.964 MGD - flow to north barrier island communities within IRCDUS service area -1.0MGD -toJI -0.153 MGD - to COVB service area - the Shores and River Club 3.116 MGD total Cost of Improvements: The engineer's opinion of probable cost to construct the recommended improvements are as follows: -16" Reuse Transmission Main: -12" Reuse distribution main/ services: -Sea Oaks Reuse water storage and pumping facilities: -Ext. of reuse main from OWBR to JI exist. pump station: -Surveying, engineering, permitting, administration, CAI: -Total Cost: $1,494,478.87 $2,134,399.40 $3,053,020.00 $ 218, 730.00 $ 485,875.00 $7,386,503.27 150 Recommendation: It is SBS recommendation that IRCDUS plan to construct facilities that will provide for the future demand of at least 3.116 MGD of reuse water to the North Barrier Island. This flow allocation is depicted and listed in Scenario C in the Hydraulic modeling and is summarized as follows: -1.964 MGD - flow to north barrier island communities within IRCDUS service area -1.0 MGD - to JI -0.153 MGD - to COVB service area - the Shores and River Club 3.116 MGD total Two system models (C-2 and C-3) that were proposed with this flow allocation are favorable 1. With storage and pumps: These flow allocations have been modeled and results indicate that the allocated flows are provided with consistently high pressures with the storage tank and pump capabilities (system model C-2). 2. Without storage and pumps: While pressures drop up to 30+- psi at the furthest demand nodes, the same flows can be provided without the tank and pump (system model C-3). This may not be a desirable long-term solution. The burden will be on the Hobart tank and pumping facilities to provide pressurized reuse water to the developments/ communities on the barrier island without a backup or fail safe that the proposed Sea Oaks 3.0 MG Reuse water storage tank provides. The improvements can be phased utilizing both system models C-2 and C-3:. o Phase 1: Limit the construction to just transmission ain and distribution main system components (the pipe network) of system C-2 (and as provided in C-3). o Phase 2: construction of the 3.0 MG reuse storage nk and pumping facilities. IRCDUS will monitor the future growth of the reuse water de a d and decide when to implement Phase 2. 'Ts The specific system recommended are the systems 'tied in C-3 and C-2, implemented as a phased project. The system consists of the lowing. • Phase 1 (system C-3): All reuse to the barrier island is fed front o`bartTank and pumps. There is not a new tank or pumps at Sea Oaksthi tim=. Existing 16" transmission line on CR 510 to A -1- A, which feeds the existi Windsor, and feeds both a new 16" line and existing 8" line south to Sea o - s par .lel mains). These parallel lines feed into a new 12" line that runs fro, Oaks soarto Old Winter Beach Road. • Phase 2 (syste From the Hobart <a�nn and pu ps, an existing 16" transmission line runs on CR 510 to A- 1 -A, which feeds an=Zistir8" line north to Windsor (and Orchid) and feeds a new 16" line south to Sea Oak where reuse will be stored in a new tank (3 MG). A new pump facility will pump the reuse water into the distribution lines, including an existing 8" line which runs north to Disney, and a new 12" new line which routes south to Old Winter Beach Road to feed JI, the Shores and River Club. System C-2 is recommended as a final solution because: • It provides high and consistent pressures throughout its service area. • It relies on the Hobart tank and pumping facilities to deliver pressurized water to Orchid/ Windsor (1.369 MGD), which reduces the volume of reuse water going to and pumped from the new Sea Oaks reuse storage tank and pumping facility to only 1.607 MGD. • The 3.0 MG tank will provide ample storage and buffer for a system with tank capacity at 188% of daily flow (*recommended min. storage capacity is equivalent to 100% of daily flow requirement; Dept of Army — Tech manual no. 5-813-4). • 1.607 MGD flow requires a min. 1115 GPM pump capacity (ADF). SBS recommends that the pumping facility mimics that at the existing Hobart reuse storage tank and pumping facility. This system has (1) 250 gpm (at 195 ft.) jockey pump and (3) 850 gpm (at 195 ft.) service pumps. The system is designed to have any two of the three 850 gpm pumps in operation at one time, with a total capacity of 1700 gpm (2.4428 MGD ADF). The additional pump capacity (1700 gpm vs 1115 gpm) provides a buffer for any unanticipated peak demands caused by multiple irrigation systems unexpectantly running simultaneously • The system can provide additional capacity (up to 3.505 MGD - reference model D-2151 1.1 Jntroduction Schulke, Bittle & Stoddard, LLC has been authorized by the Indian River County Department of Utility Services (IRCDUS) to prepare a report determining the feasibility to provide irrigation quality re-claimed water (Reuse Water) for the North Indian River County barrier island vicinity, including the feasibility to run new reuse water mains south on SR A -1-A, from CR 510 to Old Winter Beach Road, and the report will provide preliminary recommendations for the size and location of the reuse water transmission main and distribution mains in SR A -1-A, and size of storage tanks and pumping station(s) to be located at the Sea Oaks WWTP site. The Reuse system infrastructure is generally located along approximately 2.4 miles (12,700 If) of A -1-A, from CR 510 to Old Winter Beach Road. This Preliminary Engineering Report describes the manner in which proposed improvements to the IRCDUS reuse transmission and distribution systems could be integrated into the County's existing reuse water system. The Report provides an overview of the County's existing reuse water system and describes other reuse water system improvements that need to be completed in order to fully utilize the proposed improvements. The proposed improvements generally are described as follows: 1. A new utility connection will be made to at the new 16" diameter reuse transmission main wijI along A -1-A south of CR 510. It will connect 510 and SR A -1-A and will run along the e 510 to the inactive North County (Sea Oaks) along SR A -1-A from CR 510 north t existing 16" reuse main that runs alon inert section of CR 510 and SR A -1-A. A placeexisting 8" transmission main theexisting6" transmission main at CR of SR -1-A south 4,749 If from CR P. The existing 8" reuse main running main connected to and fed from the The estimated cost oft eii�tra smi si • n main is: $ 1,494,478.87 (see AFPndix A) 2. A new reuse distribution ne or will consist of: a. Ru Hing nort f om Sea Oaks: the existing 8" reuse transmission main that was re- laced . the new 16" main will be converted to a distribution main. This m. in r pproximately 4,700 If along SR A -1-A, from Sea Oaks to CR 510. b. Running south, from Sea Oaks: a new 12" reuse water distribution main will be installed from Sea Oaks and will run along the east side of SR A -1- A, south approximately 8,594 If to Old Winter Beach Road, where it will connect to a recently constructed existing 16" reuse main in Old Winter Beach Road c. Along the length of the reuse water distribution mains, stub -outs with valves will be located at strategic locations for the future connection and distribution of reuse water to several communities, providing irrigation quality reuse water. The estimated cost of the distribution system is: $ 2,134,399.40 (see Appendix A) 3. A 3.0 MG Reuse Water Storage Tank and a pumping facility are proposed to be located at the Sea Oaks WWTP, to store reuse water that is delivered from the new larger diameter reuse transmission main. The pumping facility will pump from the storage tanks into a new 152 2 reuse main distribution network which will distribute reuse water to the north and south of Sea Oaks WWTP. The estimated cost of the storage tank, pumps and related infrastructure is: $ 3,053,020.00 (see Appendix A) Additional tasks, including surveying and engineering, permitting, construction observation and inspections, and construction administration are necessary to complete the project. The estimated cost of these additional tasks and fees are: $ 485,875.00 (see Appendix A) )Backaround Information Indian River County owns and operates wastewater treatment plants strategically located throughout the unincorporated areas of the County. These wastewater plants are referred to as the South WWTP, West WWTP, Central WWTP and North P. Currently all of these plants are in operation with the exception of the North County WWTP. The North County WWTP currently functions as a re -pump station with all flows tra smi a the Central WWTP. The North WWTP may be re -activated in the future when wary ted byte sowth of wastewater flows in the North County area. Analysis of Wastewater Treatment Plant Flows: provided the following wastewater treatment 1515 t 30, 2018. The information provided indicated the ,-mp�7er County Utilities Department staff ^ormation for the year ending November owing wastewater treatment plant flows: esign Plant Actual Average Capacity Daily Flow (influent) South WWTP 2.0 MGD 0.780 MGD West WWTP 6.0 MGD 2.125 MGD Central WWTP 4.0 MGD 2.222 MGD North WWTP 1.0 MGD 0.000 MGD* 13.0 MGD 5.1 MGD *The North WWTP is currently a repump station and is not treating any flow. Currently, the County disposes of treated effluent from its wastewater treatment plants via its reuse transmission system(s) to its artificial wetland system located at the County's West WWTP site (1.22 MGD), to various golf course and residential developments on the mainland (2.88 MGD), and to several residential developments and one golf course on the North barrier Island (0.58 MGD). 153 3 Current Reuse Water Demands Analysis: Indian River County Utilities staff provided the following reuse water usage summary for the year (December 2017 to November 30, 2018): Existing Reuse Customer A. Mainland Indian River Club Golf Course Grand Harbor Golf Course Hawk's Nest Golf Course Sandridge (Dunes) Golf Course Sandridge (Lakes) Golf Course Red Stick Golf Course John Island West Golf Course Sub -total Reuse Water B. Barrier Island Orchid Island 0' GD Disney Resort 0. GD Bermuda Bay GD Sub -total Reuse Water 0.58 MGD Actual Use 0.62 MGD 0.29 MGD 0.20 MGD 0.61 MGD 0.37 MGD 0.57 MGD 0.22 MGD 2.88 , GD C. Manmade Wetlan s Wetlands Total Reuse Wate 1.22 MGD 4.68 MGD As described above, total flows to wastewater treatment plants for the year ending November 30, 2018 was 5.1 MGD, and total treated reuse water flows from the wastewater treatment plants was 4.68 MGD. (approx. 0.4 MGD is disposed of in the R.I.B. system at the West WWTP during wet weather). County Utilities Staff has advised Schulke, Bittle & Stoddard, LLC. that a minimum flow of 0.700 MGD needs to be delivered into the manmade wetland system to maintain the quality of its hydro period. Adjusting for the required 0.700 MGD treated effluent minimum that must be delivered into the manmade wetland system, the amount of reuse water currently available for reuse customers is 3.98 MGD. It is the County's goal to decrease the amount treated effluent discharged into the manmade wetland system, and to implement reuse system improvements to allow for increasing the amount of treated effluent from the mainland (south, west and central wastewater treatment plants) that can be delivered to existing or new reuse water users on the North Barrier island. The following background information describes more quantitatively the County's current reuse disposal locations and estimated what is currently available to the north barrier island: 154 4 IRCDUS Reuse Water Allocation • ADF — All WWTPs: (Less wet weather loss at RIB): (Less wetlands): Less 0 0 0 0 0 Indian River Club: Grand Harbor: Hawks Nest: SR Lakes: SR Dunes: Average daily flow to Hobart Tank: 5.102 MGD (0.420) (1.220) (0.622) (0.292) (0.196) (0.372) (0.613) 4.682 MGD 3.462 MGD 2.840 MGD = 2.548 MGD = 2.352 MGD 1.980 MGD 1.367 MGD 1.367 MGD Alk Flow to Hobart tank: Less o JI West*: o Red Stick*: Current Average Daily flow to Barrier Island: 1.367 MG (01216) 1.151 MGD 0.577 MGD 0.577 MGD *This allocation reflects current operation. ever as operational flexibility, and can re-route this flow allocation from either the Hobart facility, or diWt•distributsn from the VVVVTP's distribution system (by-passing Hobart). Current Flow to Barrierslla d: Add o Reduce wetland flow: 1.22 MGD — 0.70* MGD = 0.577 MGD +0.520 Total current flow available to Barrier Island: *Minimum to sustain wetlands is 0.70 MGD 1.097 MGD 1.097 MGD Available Average Daily Flow to Barrier Island: ADF to Island: Less o Orchid Isle: o Disney: 1.097 MGD (0.441) _ (0.054) _ 5 0.656 MGD 0.602 MGD 155 o Bermuda Bay: (0.090) Total current flow available to new customers: = 0.512 MGD 0.512 MGD Service Area Evaluation: The County desires to increase reuse flows to add (in a phased approach) barrier island reuse water customers including but not limited to Windsor and Johns Island, and other surrounding communities. At John's Island and Windsor, irrigation systems exist for both golf course and property owner association (POA) landscape improvements. Many other communities along the North barrier island operate irrigation systems for common areas and in many locations, the developments have centralized irrigation systems for all the residential properties. It is expected that demand for reuse water from all the communities on the North barrier Island from Old Winter Beach Road to Windsor could approach 4.2 MGD Wabasso Causeway to A -1-A 0.141 MGD A -1-A, from CR 510 north to Windsor 1.369 MGD A -1-A, from CR 510 south to Baytree (IRCDUS' *) 0.454 MGD A -1-A, from Marbrisa to Old Winter Beach VB SA*) 2.255 MGD Total: 4.219 MGD *SA = "service area" Reference Appendix B "Service detailed evaluation of the potential of the total demand for irrigation q North Barrier Island. alua`tion — Estimated Reuse Water Demands" for a rea on he North Barrier Island, including an estimate br existing and proposed developments on the Hydraulic Analysis: A hydraulic analysis of the proposed IRCDUS North Barrier Island reuse transmission system / pipe network was modeled using WaterCAD to help determine system component requirements, including reuse main size and pump system capacity (Refence Appendix C). Within the hydraulic models prepared to analyze the delivery of reuse water, the pumps at both the existing Hobart and proposed Sea Oaks storage and pumping facilities were modeled as a tank with a water elevation equivalent to 85 psi (195 ft. above grade). Essentially, the model assumes that the available reuse water is not limited and delivered at 85 psi from the pumping facility. The open-ended pipes at the delivery points were modeled based on the assumption that flow control was provided at all delivery points equivalent to the estimated average daily flow at each development / community. A peak demand factor was not used (PF = 1.0). It is acknowledged that individual irrigation systems are generally designed to deliver daily water needs in a much shorter time period (less than 24 hours). However, the delivery of reuse water is assumed to occur evenly throughout any given 24 hour day — due to proactive restrictions and scheduling controls by IRCDUS which ensure a nearly constant delivery of reuse water over each 156 6 and every 24 hour period. Further, it is understood that the potential customers with greatest irrigation needs (Le. John's Island, Windsor, Sea Oaks, Orchid) have the capacity to store reuse water onsite, which will provide additional assurances that the system will not be burdened with significant periods of high peak demands. Attached within Appendix C "WaterCAD Model Results" are results of several evaluations summarized as follows: Scenario A: This models the current IRCDUS flow allocation (using data from December 2017 to November 2018. (Total flow allocation of 1.097 MGD: current 0.585 MGD flow to north barrier island, and available 0.512 MGD, diverted from the manmade wetlands to JI): A-1. (refer to Appendix C, p. EX -01). Existing 16" transmission line on CR 510 to A -1-A, which feeds a new 16" Transmission line south to Sea Oaks and a new tank (3 MG). New Pumps at Sea Oaks to distribution mains: 8" exist line north to Windsor, 12" new line south to Old Winter Beach Road -(Tank delivery: 83.3 psi / Orchid : 75.4 psi / JI : 83.0 A-2. (refer to Appendix C, p. EX -02). Existing 16" rhtsmission ' e on CR 510 to A -1-A, which feeds an existing 8" line north to Windsor, and new " line outh to Sea Oaks and a new tank (3 MG). New pumps to distribution mains: 8 x i e north to Disney, 12" new line south to Old Winter Beach Road. -(Tank delivery: 83.7 psi / Orchid : 80.5 A-3. (refer to Appendix C, p. EX -03). ll re se o island fed from Hobart Tank and pumps. No new tank or pumps at Sea Oak4. E !sting " transmission line on CR 510 to A -1-A, which feeds the existing 8" line north o " i • sor, - n • feeds both the new 16" line and existing 8" line south to Sea Oaks (parallel mains). T e 6 reduces to a new 12" line from Sea Oaks south to Old Winter Beach Ro -(No Tank / Orchid: • si. / ' I ; a 2. • si) Note All models provide near y t e same high delivered pressures. A-3 provides adequate flow and delivery pressure without a ank or pumps. Scenario B: This models an estimated flow allocation for all current and potential future reuse customers within the IRCDUS service area and additional flow to the John's Island development. The basis of the flow allocation was estimated to be the sum of: the flow allocations of all developments with an existing SJRWMD CUP, plus an estimated flow allocation of 1.0 MGY per acre of irrigated area for developments without a SJRWMD CUP, plus 1.0 MGD flow allocation for John's Island development. (Total flow allocation of 2.964 MGD: estimated 1.964 MGD flow to north barrier island communities within IRCDUS service area, and an additional 1.0 MGD to JI): B-1. (refer to Appendix C, p. EX -04). Existing 16" transmission line on CR 510 to A -1-A, which feeds a new 16" Transmission line south to Sea Oaks and a new tank (3 MG). New Pumps at Sea Oaks to distribution mains: 8" exist line north to Windsor, 12" new line south to Old Winter Beach Road -(Tank delivery : 53 psi / Windsor : 7.40 psi / JI : 79.2 psi) 157 B-2. (refer to Appendix C, p. EX -05). Existing 16" transmission line on CR 510 to A -1-A, which feeds an existing 8" line north to Windsor, and a new 16" line south to Sea Oaks and a new tank (3 MG). New pumps to distribution mains: 8" exist line north to Disney, 12" new line south to Old Winter Beach Road. -(Tank delivery — 56 psi, Windsor — 16.7 psi, JI — 79.3 psi) B-3. (refer to Appendix C, p. EX -06). All reuse to island fed from Hobart Tank and pumps. There is not a new tank or pumps at Sea Oaks. Existing 16" transmission line on CR 510 to A -1-A, which feeds the existing 8" line north to Windsor, and feeds both the new 16" line and existing 8" line south to Sea Oaks (parallel mains), which reduces to a new 12" line from Sea Oaks south to Old Winter Beach Road. -(No Tank / Windsor : 16.7 psi / J1- 51.4 psi) Note; B-2 provides the highest and most consistent pressures to all communities. B-3 provides adequate flow and low but acceptable delivery pressure without a tank or pumps. Scenario C: This model is the same estimated flow allocation as Scenario B, plus an additional flow allocation into the COVB service area for the Shores arl&River Club developments (Total flow allocation of 3.116 MGD: estimated 1.964 MGD flo t north barrier island communities within IRCDUS service area, additional 1.0 MGD to JIB _nd n additional 0.153 MGD to COVB service area - the Shores and River Club): C-1. (refer to Appendix C, p. EX -07). Existing 16" transmission line on CR 510 to A -1-A, which feeds a new 16" Transmission line southo Sea a aks� 'ti a new tank (3 MG). New Pumps at Sea Oaks to distribution mains: 8" exist line (o h to w indsor, 12" new line south to Old Winter Beach Road -(Tank delivery : 49 psi / Wind C-2. (refer to Appendix C, • EX - feeds an existing 8" line tank (3 MG). New pu ps to Old Winter Beach Road -(Tank delivery : 53 psi ing 16" transmission line on CR 510 to A -1-A, which r, and a new 16" line south to Sea Oaks and a new tion mains: 8" exist line north to Disney, 12" new line south r : 13.6 psi / JI : 77.8 psi) C-3. (refer to Appendix C, p. EX -09). All reuse to island fed from Hobart Tank and pumps. There is not a new tank or pumps at Sea Oaks. Existing 16" transmission line on CR 510 to A -1-A, which feeds the existing 8" line north to Windsor, and feeds both the new 16" line and existing 8" line south to Sea Oaks (parallel mains), which reduces to a new 12" line from Sea Oaks south to Old Winter Beach Road. -(No Tank / Windsor : 13.5 psi / J1: 46.6 psi) Note: C-2 provides the highest and most consistent pressures to all communities. C-3 provides adequate flow and low but acceptable delivery pressure without a tank or pumps. Scenario D: This model is the same estimated flow allocation as Scenario C, plus additional flow allocations into the COVB service area until the system failed. The purpose was to estimate the maximum capacity of the transmission and distribution system on the North barrier Island (Additional flows were incrementally increased in each version D-1, D-2 or D-3 below, until the system failed to deliver flows at adequate pressures. Failure was considered to be a pressure below the following: 10 psi at the top of the Wabasso bridge, 15 psi at the Sea Oaks tank, or 5 psi at Windsor). The total flow allocation varies per model below, and included an estimated 1.964 158 8 MGD flow to north barrier island communities within IRCDUS service area, additional 1.0 MGD to JI, an additional 0.153 MGD for the Shores and River Club, and additional flow allocation for the COVB service area determined below: D-1. (refer to Appendix C, p. EX -10). Existing 16" transmission line on CR 510 to A -1-A, which feeds a new 16" Transmission line south to Sea Oaks and a new tank (3 MG). New Pumps at Sea Oaks to distribution mains: 8" exist line north to Windsor, 12" new line south to Old Winter Beach Road -(Bridge : 10.6 psi / Tank delivery : 15.3 psi / Windsor : 7.3 psi / JI : 64.8 psi) - (Max Capacity: 4.34 MGD: 1.964 MGD IRCDUS SA, 1.0 MGD JI, 0.153 MGD Shores/ River Club, 1.22 MGD additional for COVB SA) D-2. (refer to Appendix C, p. EX -11). Existing 16" transmission line on CR 510 to A -1-A, which feeds an existing 8" line north to Windsor, and a new 16" line south to Sea Oaks and a new tank (3 MG). New pumps to distribution mains: 8" exist line north to Disney, 12" new line south to Old Winter Beach Road. - (Bridge : 27.5 psi / Tank delivery : 43 psi / Windsor ; 5.0 i / JI : 74.4 psi) -(Max Capacity: 3.51 MGD: 1.964 MGD IRCDUS SA, 1.OJilGD JI, 0.153 MGD Shores/River Club, 0.39 MGD additional for COVB SA) D-3. (refer to Appendix C, p. EX -12). All reuse to island fed from Hobart Tank and pumps. There is not a new tank or pumps at Sea Oaks. xistang 16" transmission line on CR 510 to A -1-A, which feeds the existing 8" line north to Win~ o , and feeds both the new 16" line and existing 8" line south to Sea Oaks (parall -1 a'ns), whir, reduces to a new 12" line from Sea Oaks south to Old Winter Beach Road. -(Bridge : 27.5 psi / No Tank / Wi dsor : . ' : 34.1 psi) -(Max Capacity: 3.51 MGD: 1.9 • ' IR D S SA, 1.0 MGD JI, 0.153 MGD Shores/ River Club, 0.39 MGD additional fo Note: D-1 provides the highest same 3.51 MGD capacity However, D-3 provides th cap city of 4.34 MGD. While D-2 and D-3 provide the s hh gher and more consistent delivered pressures. w without a tank or pumps, but at very low pressures. Comprehensive Reuse System Improvements The ability for IRCDUS to deliver additional reuse water to the North Barrier Island will require meeting several system needs: 1. Adequate available reuse water: Currently the total available reuse water quantity is 4.68 MGD from all the IRCDUS wastewater treatment plants. With 0.52 MGD diverted from the artificial wetlands to the Hobart storage tank, under current operating conditions, there is 1.097* MGD available that can be pumped to the North barrier Island. (Existing IRCDUS service area customers on the barrier island currently receive 0.577 MGD, which results in 0.512 MGD of unallocated flow that is available to John's Island or other potential customers on the island. There is an estimated 4.22 MGD maximum potential demand from existing and proposed communities on the North Barrier Island, but 1.097 MGD* available. IRCDUS may want to pursue the availability of other water sources, such as mixing surface waters with the reuse waters from the IRFWCD or other sources or re -allocating the distribution of reuse water. 159 9 *This allocation reflects current operation. However, IRCDUS has operational flexibility, and can re -allocate reuse water flows, sending more to the North Barrier Island and less to mainland recipients. Conversely, during wet -weather periods IRCDUS may need to evaluate other disposal options other than golf courses. 2. Hobart Tank/ pump upgrades: Currently the Hobart reuse water storage and pumping facilities has the capacity to deliver 1.6 MGD. The system was designed with (1) 250 gpm at 195 ft. jockey pump and (3) 850 gpm at 195 ft service pumps. The system is designed to have any two of the three 850 gpm pumps in operation at one time, with a 16 hour per day cycle time. Currently, approximately 1.367 MGD of Reuse water is pumped to and pumped from the Hobart facility. The Hobart facility will require upgrades to meet any additional flow allocations to the North barrier island. Scenario A: -Total all current Reuse pumped from Hobart: -1.097 MGD to island, 0.520 MGD diverted from wetlands: Total Reuse 300 gpm additional capacity needed Scenario B: -Total all current Reuse pumped from Hobart: -2.964 MGD to island, 2.387 MGD additional from Total Reuse 2250 gpm additional capacity Scenario C: -Total all current Reuse pumped -3.116 MGD to island, 2.539 Total Reuse 2400 gpm addi Scenario D: -Total all current Reuse u� p_edjftom Hobart: 1.367 MGD -4.340 MGD to island, 3.773 MD additional from Hobart: +3.763 MGD Total Reuse 5.130 MGD > 1.60 MGD 3680 gpm additional capacity needed 3. North Barrier Island Reuse system improvements: The system improvements necessary include: 1.367 MGD 0.520 MGD 1.887 MGD > 1.60 MGD .367 MGD +2.387 MGD 3.754 MGD > 1.60 MGD 1.367 MGD +2.539 MGD 3.906 MGD > 1.60 MGD a. Construct a new 16" diameter reuse transmission main south along SR A -1-A. This main will replace the existing 8" transmission main along A -1-A. It will connect to the existing 16" transmission main at CR 510 and SR A -1-A, and will run along the east side of SR A- 1 -A south 4749 If from CR 510 to the inactive Sea Oaks VWVTP located within the Sea Oaks community. b. Construct a new reuse distribution network, including: • Running north: the existing 8" reuse transmission main that was re -placed by the new 16" main will be converted to a distribution main. This main is approximately 4,700 If along SR A -1-A, from Sea Oaks to CR 510. 160 10 • Running south: a new 12" reuse water distribution main will be installed from Sea Oaks and will run along the east side of SR A -1-A, south along SR A -1-A, approximately 8,594 If to Old Winter Beach Road, where it will connect to a recently constructed 16" reuse main in Old Winter Beach Road • Along the length of the reuse water distribution mains, stub -outs with valves will be located at strategic locations for the future connection and distribution of reuse water to several communities, providing irrigation quality reuse water. c. Construct a 3.0 MG reuse storage tank and a pumping facility. Optional systems that were considered are. Scenario A: Tank and Pump not needed Scenario C - (C-2): 1.607 MGD flow. 1115 gpm min. / 195 ft. pump capacity Scenario D — (D-1): 4.199 MGD flow. 2915 gpm min. / 195 ft. pump capacity Scenario D — (D-2): 1.995 MGD flow. 1385 gpm min. / 195 ft. pump capacity Constructabilitv The reuse transmission and distribution mains co tt5 empl�ated wit is preliminary engineering report and evaluation are proposed along SRA -1-A etween CR 510 and Old Winter Beach Road. Right of way width is limited, and existing roadway andIrray improvements limit the area available to install the reuse mains. Therefore, a detail d evaluation fj he constructability of the reuse main was prepared, and it was determined that ade to ms's available to install the proposed reuse mains along the east side of SR A-1- using the irectio al bore method of pipe installation. This evaluation included: 1. Obtained locates fro all utili ro iders. This is was provided by painting and flagging the location of thet, tail ies a' on th route. 2. Obtained availablebuilts of record from all utility providers. 3. Prepared a detailed rout sriey of SR A -1-A from CR 510 to Old Winter Beach Road. (by a registered land sou eyor). The survey included the location of the `location paint and flags" from utility providers, topography, location of any above ground utilities and other infrastructure. 4. The physical location of existing utility infrastructure on SR A -1-A ROW was obtained. After review of utility as-builts and utility field locates, it was determined that the east side of the ROW appeared to be the least congested and best location for a new reuse main. To confirm, a licensed utility contractor was retained to excavate a 6 ft. deep trench perpendicular to the road every 750 ft. +/- and other strategic locations, from the EOP to the ROW line, along the proposed A -1-A route. The utility contractor and surveyor recorded the location and depth of all utilities encountered with each excavation, and a cross section of every location was drawn depicting the existing grade, location, depth and elevation of each utility. 5. An Engineering base plan (CAD drawing) of existing conditions along the route of A -1-A was prepared, incorporating the information and drawings obtained or created via steps 1-4 above. The base plan was evaluated to determine the best route for the new reuse transmission and distribution mains. The east side of SR A -1-A was confirmed to be the least congested and easiest route to construct the new reuse main. 161 11 6. Geotechnical data was obtained (borings every 750' +/-) and results confirmed that there were no deleterious materials (rock, muck, etc.) that could cause constructability issues. 7. Preliminary construction plans were prepared depicting the new 16" reuse Transmission main and 12" reuse Distribution main, and the location of service laterals. Due to the ROW area constraints, the reuse mains were designed to be installed by the horizontal directional bore method. This method permits the installation of polyethylene reuse main piping via a method of drilling a horizontal shaft thru the soil (approximately 5' to 8' deep) and then pulling the pipe back thru the shaft. The pipe is heat fused / butt welded to provide a long continuous pipe. A Directional bore contractor and utility contractor the engineer has consulted with has advised that this method within the sandy soils encountered along the route can be accomplished in 750 ft. pulls. This method allows the installer to avoid potential conflicts with pavement improvements or existing utilities by allowing the installer to plan and selecting bore pit locations where adequate area is available, and by boring beneath and/ or around the conflicting facilities. Preliminary construction plans are included as an attachment to this report. 8. A Preliminary construction cost estimate for the placement of the mains along the route from CR 510 to Old Winter Beach Road was prepared (see Appendix A) -16" Reuse Transmission Main: $1,494,478.87 -12" Reuse distribution main/ services $2,134,399.40 - Sea Oaks Reuse water storage and pumpi facilities: 3,053,020.00 - Surveying, engineering, permitting, administra{oj„C�Al: 485,875.00 -Total Project Cost: $7,167,773.27 12 162 Conclusion of Preliminary Engineering Report This report provides an estimate of the potential maximum demand for reuse water from all communities on the North barrier island, from Old Winter Beach Road north to Windsor. This estimate approaches 4.2 MGD. However, the likely demand will be lower. Considering that of the 4.2 MGD estimated demand, at least 2.25 MGD of this estimated demand comes from developments / communities within the COVB utility service area. Currently the COVB provides limited amounts of reuse water to several developments (including John's Island). Some existing developments, especially those lying in the city's service area who may be able to refuse service, may not want to connect to IRCDUS reuse water. Reasons vary, but one may be the significant costs that would be realized by any development to modify its irrigation system to take reuse water. Another obstacle may be the actual cost to purchase the reuse water from IRCDUS when the perception is that groundwater and/ or surface water is free. This report also models and estimates the reuse infrastructure capacity and has found that the reuse transmission system / pipe network could potentially deliver 4.34 MGD of reuse water (if available). However, actual capacity of the IRCDUS reuse system (the entire system) to deliver reuse water is likely lower. It will be many years before the ,equisite quantity of reuse water is available from the county's three WWTP's. In addition, the a acity of the Hobart reuse storage tank and pumping facility may be a limitation. The facili , was esigned to deliver 1.6 MGD with a 3.0 MG storage tank. Consider that if total barrier islarl' deman .eached 4.2 MGD, and existing mainland demand is 0.79 MGD (Redstick and JI Well ;the total de ; and from the Hobart facility could approach 5.0 MGD, or over 3 times its orig' 1 d si n. Further, the transmission mains (double 12" parallel mains) that cross (and ang fro the Wabasso Bridge are older system components, and IRCDUS may not want theseli s co star,tly running at peak capacity. Recommendation: It is SBS recommendation that RG-DIan to construct facilities that will provide for the future demand of at least 3.116 M D o e se a er to the North Barrier Island. This flow allocation is depicted and listed in Scerati.o C in th Hydraulic modeling and is summarized as follows: -1.964 MGD - flow to north1barrier island communities within IRCDUS service area -1.0 MGD - to JI -0.153 MGD - to COVB service area - the Shores and River Club 3.116 MGD total Two system models (C-2 and C-3) that were proposed with this flow allocation are favorable 1. With storage and pumps: These flow allocations have been modeled and results indicate that the allocated flows are provided with consistently high pressures with the storage tank and pump capabilities (system model C-2). 2. Without storage and pumps: While pressures drop up to 30+- psi at the furthest demand nodes, the same flows can be provided without the tank and pump (system model C-3). This may not be a desirable Tong -term solution. The burden will be on the Hobart tank and pumping facilities to provide pressurized reuse water to the developments/ communities on the barrier island without a backup or fail safe that the proposed Sea Oaks 3.0 MG Reuse water storage tank provides. 163 13 The improvements can be phased utilizing both system models C-2 and C-3:. o Phase 1: Limit the construction to just transmission main and distribution main system components (the pipe network) of system C-2 (and as provided in C-3). o Phase 2: construction of the 3.0 MG reuse storage tank and pumping facilities. IRCDUS will monitor the future growth of the reuse water demand and decide when to implement Phase 2. The specific system recommended are the systems modeled in C-3 and C-2, implemented as a phased project. The system consists of the following: • Phase 1 (system C-3): All reuse to the barrier island is fed from Hobart Tank and pumps. There is not a new tank or pumps at Sea Oaks at this time. Existing 16" transmission line on CR 510 to A -1- A, which feeds the existing 8" line north to Windsor, and feeds both a new 16" line and existing 8" line south to Sea Oaks (parallel mains). These parallel lines feed into a new 12" line that runs from Sea Oaks south to Old Winter Beach Road. • Phase 2 (system C-2) From the Hobart Tank and pumps, an existing 16" 1-A, which feeds an existing 8" line north to Wien line south to Sea Oaks where reuse will b facility will pump the reuse water into the which runs north to Disney, and a new 12" new Beach Road to feed JI, the Shores a trans ission line runs on CR 510 to A- sor (an Orchid) and feeds a new 16" sstoreUn a ne 3 tank (3 MG). A new pump 1stn �b�tion lines, including an existing 8" line line which routes south to Old Winter System C-2 is recommended as a final • It provides high and consiste • It relies on the Hobart tank Windsor (1.369 MGD) twhich from the new Sea 0 • The 3.0 MG tank 188% of daily flow flow requirement; Dept utio •cause: pres ure t' roughout its service area. an • e amping, acilities to deliver pressurized water to Orchid/ reduces he volume of reuse water going to and pumped stora tank and pumping facility to only 1.607 MGD. rovide ar ple storage and buffer for a system with tank capacity at om eer%ded min. storage capacity is equivalent to 100% of daily — Tech manual no. 5-813-4). • 1.607 MGD flow requires a'min. 1115 GPM pump capacity (ADF). SBS recommends that the pumping facility mimics that at the existing Hobart reuse storage tank and pumping facility. This system has (1) 250 gpm (at 195 ft.) jockey pump and (3) 850 gpm (at 195 ft.) service pumps. The system is designed to have any two of the three 850 gpm pumps in operation at one time, with a total capacity of 1700 gpm (2.4428 MGD ADF). The additional pump capacity (1700 gpm vs 1115 gpm) provides a buffer for any unanticipated peak demands caused by multiple irrigation systems unexpectantly running simultaneously • The system can provide additional capacity (up to 3.505 MGD - reference model D-2). Additional requirements: 1. Obtaining and delivery of adequate reuse water. There is an estimated 3.116 MGD potential demand from existing and proposed communities on the North Barrier Island for this system recommendation, but only 1.097 MGD available under current operating conditions. Until and/ or in addition to the anticipated future Indian River County growth (with corresponding increases in wastewater generated), IRCDUS may want to pursue the availability of other water sources, such as mixing surface waters with the reuse waters 164 14 from the IRFWCD or other sources or re -allocating the distribution of reuse water. 2. Upgrading the Hobart reuse tank and pumping facilities: Currently, approximately 1.367 MGD of Reuse water is pumped to and pumped from the Hobart facility. The Hobart facility has a current pump capacity limited to 1.60 MGD. Only a minimal increase in reuse water demand will require the addition of pump(s) / pump capacity. The estimated existing and future demand from the barrier island for the recommended system is 3.116 MGD. Hobart will need the addition of another 2400 gpm of pumping capacity. ‹c's 15 165 Annendix A Cost estimate for the construction of the North Barrier Island Reuse System Improvements 166 16 Sea Oaks 3.0 MG Ground Reuse Water Storage Tank & Pumping Facilities Construction Cost Estimate 16" Transmission Main (C.R. 510 to Sea Oaks) UNIT QUANTITY UNIT PRICE TOTAL Mobilization LS 1 $ 40,000.00 $ 40,000.00 M.O.T. LS 1 $ 12,000.00 $ 12,000.00 S.W.P.P.P. LS 1 $ 3,000.00 $ 3,000.00 Testing LS 1 $ 5,000.00 $ 5,000.00 Construction Stake-ODUAS-Builts LS 1 $ 6,000.00 $ 6,000.00 Restoration (Compact, Grade & Sod) LS 1 $ 10,010.00 $ 10,010.00 16" Directional Bore/HDPE Pipe LF 4,749 $ 219.00 $ 1,040,031.00 16" PVC Pipe LF 30 $ 175.00 $ 5,250.00 16"x16" Tapping Sleeve EA 1 $ 8,500.00 $ 8,500.00 16" M.J.G.V. W/(2) MJ Adaptor, (2) Long Sleeve & PVC Pipe EA 6 $ 18,212.00 $ 109,272.00 16" M.J. 45 BD W/(2) MJ Adaptor, (1) Long Sleeve & PVC Pipe EA 2 $ 7,516.00 $ 15,032.00 16" M.J. 90 BD W/(2) MJ Adaptor, (1) Long Sleeve & PVC Pipe EA 2 $ 7,516.00 $ 15,032.00 16" Plug EA 1 $ 700.00 $ 700.00 Air Release Valve (Concrete, Pipe, Saddle & Gravel) EA 2 $ 12,900.00 $ 25,800.00 Sidewalk Demo/Replacement SF 286 $ 7.44 $ 2,127.84 Asphalt Patch SY 56 $ 32.00 $ 1,792.00 Short Service (Proposed) - Assume 6" \ \/ / Subtotal $ 1,299,546.84 Contingency 15% LS 1 n $ 194,932.03 $ 194,932.03 EA Subtotal $ 1,494,478.87 Distribution Main & Services UNIT QUANTITY\ UNIT PRICE TOTAL A. Distribution Main LS / ) \ \ $ 60,000.00 Mobilization LS/ / 1 `‘,$ •N 50,000.00 $ 50,000.00 M.O.T. LS\ \\ / 1) $-' 20,000.00 $ 20,000.00 S.W.P.P.P. LS `, - /1 $ 3,500.00 $ 3,500.00 Testing f\LS LS \ \1 $ 5,000.00 $ 5,000.00 Construction Stake-Out/As-Builts ( , . LSA \ $ 10,000.00 $ 10,000.00 Restoration (Compact. Grade & Sod) \ \ CS.. `1 $ 30,030.00 $ 30,030.00 12" Directional Bore/HDPE Pipe , \LF' / x/8,594 $ 162.00 $ 1,392,228.00 12" PVC Pipe / \ \ LFA 80 $ 155.00 $ 12,400.00 12" M.J.G.V. W/ (2) MJ Adaptor, (2) Long Sleeve & PA Pipe \ ) \EA 12 $ 7,582.00 $ 90,984.00 12" Plug \ \,/ ! . EA' 2 $ 500.00 $ 1,000.00 Air Release Valve (Concrete, Pipe, Saddle & Gravel_ \ ( `..../EA 3 $ 12,900.00 $ 38,700.00 12"x12" M.J. Tee W/ (3) MJ Adaptor, (2) Logg""Sleeve 0VC,Pipe, EA 2 $ 7,640.00 $ 15,280.00 12" 90 Deg. Bend W/(2) MJ Adaptor, (1) 14ng'Sleeve'& PVC Pipe/ EA 2 $ 5,280.00 $ 10,560.00 12" 45 Deg. Bend W/(2) MJ Adaptor, (1) bong`Sleeve &`PVC Pipe EA 1 $ 5,280.00 $ 5,280.00 B. Distribution Services \ \ 1 J Short Service (Proposed) - Assume 6" \ \/ / EA 1 $ 6,500.00 $ 6,500.00 Short Service (On Existing) - Assume 6" \ / EA 2 $ 8,000.00 $ 16,000.00 Long Service (Proposed) - Assume 6" EA 2 $ 17,000.00 $ 34,000.00 Long Service (On Existing) - Assume 6" EA 2 $ 18,500.00 $ 37,000.00 6" 90 Deg. Bend W/(2) MJ Adaptor, (1) Long Sleeve & PVC Pipe EA 8 $ 4,350.00 $ 34,800.00 6" 45 Deg. Bend W/(2) MJ Adaptor, (1) Long Sleeve & PVC Pipe EA 4 $ 4,350.00 $ 17,400.00 6" PVC Pipe LF 225 $ 75.00 $ 16,875.00 Sidewalk Demo/Replacement SF 1017 $ 7.44 $ 7,566.48 Asphalt Patch SY 28 $ 32.00 $ 896.00 Subtotal $ 1,855,999.48 Contingency 15% LS 1 $ 278,399.92 $ 278,399.92 Subtotal $ 2,134,399.40 Sea Oaks Tank & Pump Station UNIT QUANTITY UNIT PRICE TOTAL Mobilization LS 1 $ 60,000.00 $ 60,000.00 S.W.P.P.P. LS 1 $ 5,000.00 $ 5,000.00 Testing LS 1 $ 10,000.00 $ 10,000.00 Construction Stake-Out/As-Builts LS 1 $ 15,000.00 $ 15,000.00 3.0 MG Pre -Stressed Concrete Tank & Foundation * LS 1 $ 1,400,000.00 $ 1,400,000.00 Packaged Pump Station " LS 1 $ 695,000.00 $ 695,000.00 Site Clearing & Preparation LS 1 $ 62,780.00 $ 62,780.00 Yard Piping LS 1 $ 148,300.00 $ 148,300.00 Drainage System & Final Grading LS 1 $ 41,460.00 $ 41,460.00 Electrical LS 1 $ 27,250.00 $ 27,250.00 Monitoring & Control LS 1 $ 33,170.00 $ 33,170.00 167 J:\2018\18-122 IRCDUS A1A Re -Use Main C3D\Documents\Cost Estimate\Cost Estimate.xlsx Paved Parking & Driveway LS 1 $ 51,170.00 $ 51,170.00 Landscape & Irrigation LS 1 $ 14,810.00 $ 14,810.00 Project Documents & Closeout LS 1 $ 5,100.00 $ 5,100.00 Misc./Incidental Construction LS 1 $ 85,760.00 $ 85,760.00 12" MJGV* Subtotal $ 2,654,800.00 Contingency 15% LS 1 $ 398,220.00 $ 398,220.00 EA Subtotal $ 3,053,020.00 * 3.0 MG Pre -Stressed Concrete Tank & Foundation Includes: - Pre-Stress/Shotcrete Walls - 4" Membrane Slab - Concrete Dome - Standard Accessories - Exterior Paint - Excludes Site Work, Piping, Interior Coatings & Baffling Pump Station Package Includes: - 41'x14' Enclosed Structure - (1) 250 GPM Pump - (3) 850 GPM Pumps - Provisions to Add (Future) (2) 1700 GPM Pumps Extension of Reuse Main - OWBR to JI Exist. Pump Station UNIT QUANTITY UNIT PRICE TOTAL Mobilization LS 1 $ 5,000.00 $ 5,000.00 MOT LS 1 ,i,, $ 2,350.00 $ 2,350.00 12" DB HDPE LF 1000F $ 162.00 $ 162,000.00 12" MJGV* EA „411 $ 7,582.00 $ 7,582.00 12" MJ PUG EA Subtotal $ 500.00 $ 500.00 _ 4W1‘1•1., 12" 90 MJ BD* EA ,>r 1 "IN 1$, 5,280.00 $ 5,280.00 Restoarion LSAT r 1' I$6, 3,000.00 $ 3,000.00 Sidewalk demo/repair SPIN 1 42c 0 $' 7.44 $ 1,488.00 Testing LS '1- WW1 $ 1,500.00 $ 1,500.00 Survey / as-builts / lb,,,LS $ 1,500.00 $ 1,500.00 IMO Subtotal $ 190,200.00 Contingency 15% N Es O., `1 $ 28,530.00 $ 28,530.00 % Subtotal $ 218,730.00 'Includes (2) MJ adaptors (2) long sleeves and PVC pipe **This number does not include surveying, engineering.. a 'g permitting. It has been represented that JI has prepa ed a aafor this 12" reuse main extension. Cost for CAI i ssume to bb7coDred in the estmated costs for the other reuse prove a ts.� Construction Grand Total 1 $ 6,900,628.27 Engineering/Professional UNIT QUANTITY UNIT PRICE TOTAL Engineering/Surveying Design LS 1 $ 350,000.00 $ 350,000.00 Inspections/Certifications LS 1 $ 50,000.00 $ 50,000.00 Permit Application/Costs LS 1 $ 22,500.00 $ 22,500.00 Subtotal $ 422,500.00 'Contingency 15% LS 1 $ 63,375.00 $ 63,375.00 Subtotal $ 485,875.00 Transmission Main Sub -Total $ 1,494,478.87 Distribution Main & Service Sub -Total $ 2,134,399.40 Tank & Pump Sub -Total $ 3,053,020.00 OWBR to JI Exist. Pump Station Extension $ 218,730.00 Engineering/Professional Sub -Total $ 485,875.00 Grand Total $ 7,386,503.27 168 J:12018\18-122 IRCDUS A1A Re -Use Main C3D\Documents\Cost Estimate\Cost Estimate.xlsx Appendix B Service Area Evaluation (Estimated Reuse Water Demands) 169 19 Appendill B Servke Area Evaluation (Estimated Reuse Water Demands) 1191221RCDUS AIA R.•Use Main Analysis CR 510Nsieth WM... IRCOUS Pelf... Sequence No Project Name Received Date Issue Dale Expired.) Dote Permit Stows 518WM0 Project 00e2g0 Cur Yea Water Alloc.(MGY) Allocation Sources Total Mlocano0 MGT Total Development Area Irrigation Area Irrigation% Flow MGT/Acre 5.460 GPM 200.003 Node6 270 4 Windsor 9/3/2013 10/11/2013 4/13/7019 kuued 230.76 965 1.4 241.4 416 1429 34.4 169 06614 459.385 24 270 4 WbM10. 9/3/2013 10/11/2013 4/13/2019 Issued 230.78 1429 Surface 260 9 Orchid Island 2/20/2013 3/20/2013 3/7/2020 Issued 278.2 100.4 258.2 436 276 - 634 0.93 0.7074 494.248 12 200 9 Orchid Island 2/20/2013 3/20/2013 3/7/2020 issued 278.2 - 157.8 Surface QI no Fut to Wen-Mm115 TOTAL 499 6 1.369 6060 Permit No Sequence No Project Name Received Date Issue Dale Expiration Dale Permit Status SIRWMDProiect Acreage CM Year W.ler Alloc.(MG0) Allocation Sources Taal Allocation MGT Total Development Area Rrlgalbn Area 4114431on% Flow4360/Dire MGD GPM Junction Node 8 10001 4 a Orchid Grave 10/25/2001 5/20/2002 5/20/2012 Issued 1099 1.5 1.4 31.3 39.17 10.99 28.1 1.03 0.0304 23.139 150 30001 4Old OnMs1Gmve 10/25/2001 5/10/2002 5/20/1022 Issued 10.99 96 Surface 82406 2 Marsh bland 6/7/2012 7/10/2012 6/15/2022 Issued 8.57 d 12.52 27.2 8.52 31.3 1.47 0 034 23.810 d6 82406 2 Marsh Island 6/7/2012 7/10/1012 6/15/2022 Issued 8.57 652 Surface 2373 5.60 Environmental Lmrrdng Center 660 7/30/2001 1.00 00153 10.65 2.76 N/A 2.76 51 4.6 9.0 0.60 00076 5.251 139 N/A 3.45 Season's at Orchid 3.45 35.0 1.00 0.0094 656 143 N/A 12.79 3603 12.79 35.5 1.00 0.0350 24.332 15 61/2 12.6] Orchld Com (RM Mkehel Creek) 2257 35.0 1.00 0034] 20.11 144 2351 8.70 2643 8.7 32.9 1.00 0.0238 16.553 148 • 31/0 717 As..# 1ew6 Jungle 11330& 510 ;."‘•;•71 / 57.9 090 0.1964 136.42 16 2353 3.64 10.4 3.64 350 1.00 00100 6.925 155 T0TA1 51509 0.141 8450 c2.0 alta 8.881.08Fncvrnaoumemumnmxmea Permit No Sequence No IMAM> Project Name Received Dale Issue Date Expiration Dale Pat MI Status SIRWMD Role. Acreage Cur Year Water Alloc.(MGV) 68001tmn Sources Allocation MGT Total Develo ant Area / r /') � 4t18a/ 1 \40aee MIge0 Flow MGY/bate MGO GPM fun.. Node 4459 3 Onneys Vero eeaeh Ru8n 5/23/2002 6/28/1002 6/28/2022 1sued 8 1.4 616202 22 ! / 36. 0.88 00192 13.32 1) 4459 3 Disnees Vero Beach Resort 5/23/2002 6/28/2002 6/28/2022 Issued 8 5.6 WA Disney West 9.10 16 9.10 35.0 1.00 00249 17.31 140 14/4 C00.6600e 5.60 J11i0, 660 35.0 1.00 00153 10.65 141 N/A 1400 Snore Club 3.45 \9.85.. 1 3.45 35.0 1.00 0.0094 656 143 N/A Bermuda Club 12.6] i06 �s 2257 35.0 1.00 0034] 20.11 144 2351 4 Sea Wks t/28/11113 2/18/10/3 2/18/1023 Issued 71 15.9 90,60, 717 As..# All N ►/' ;."‘•;•71 / 57.9 090 0.1964 136.42 16 2353 d Sea Oaks 1/28/2013 2/16/2013 2/18/2023 Issued 71 45.8 N/A Grand %arbu(hA 1.63 4.5 Ij 1.61 35.0 1.00 00094 3.06 146 67589 Zlsland Dub 10/29/200310/29/2003 7/6/2031 Issued 45.0 9.(19 <1.,(17,.. 7.1 �j 45.1 46.8 100 0.]246 6651 13 67569 2 Island Club 10/29/200310/29/1003 1/6/2011 8sued 45.4 3638 Surface/ 2238 2 Baytree Condo - 33/12/199812/30/1998 . 12/30/2018 Issued 9.7 99 0--.926.6.10 9.7 33.9 093 00247 17.12 9 CA SIO South. 11605IsYM-COVE .J070196.165:5975 J". [/1 MG 1602062 1.964 MGD \ 0.494 713mR N0 Sequence No 0,0)101 Name Received Dale 6102 Del, Ewinn00 Dale Permit Status SIRWMD RONn Acreage Cur Yea SV) A110c.(MGV) AB.can �� 30,31,, 1AIIi Total Development A74e 83142110, Area 409.2)03 % 310w 8107/Acre MGD 6064 Junction 504. 0 5708 5 Marhrh. Nwn,owners Associa wn 11/12/2010 11/19/2014 11/19/2024 issued 35 366 '5 1 / 366 71.5 3S 49.0 1.05 01003 69.63 N/A N/A - Sea Colony West 1.40 4 1.40 35.0 1.00 0.0038 2.66 N/A N/A SU Colony last 3.06 6.8 . . 308 35.0 3.00 00044 586 N/A WA Avalon 2.99 8.54 2.99 35,0 1.00 0.0082 5.69 0/0 50295 3 Indian Trails 8/17/2018 6(28/2018 8/28/2038 Issued 13 3.2 601600 35.5 76 16 211 2.22 0.0973 67.54 N/A 50295 3 Indian Trails 4/17/2018 8/28/2018 8/24/2038 Issued 13 32.3 N/A Ocean Pearl East 4.53 12.95 4.53 35.0 1.00 00124 8.62 N/A N/A Ocean Pearl West 3.48 9.94 348 35.0 100 0.0095 662 N/A N/A The Strand 11.80 33.71 11.80 35.0 1.00 0.0323 22.45 16/0 81/4 205063e2n 1.61 4.61 1.61 35.0 1.00 0.0044 3.07 69A N/A Palm Island Plantation 19.80 56.56 19.80 35.0 100 0.0547 37.66 81/6 WA Carlton Vere Reach 6.30 1513 5.30 35.0 4.00 0.0145 10.08 N/A 70018 2 Carlton River Club 7/5/2017 7/20/2017 5/22/2022 Issued 28 9.8 265 135 1619 30.9 101 0.0781 50.22 157 70018 2 Carlton River Chub 7/6/2017 7/20)2017 5/22/2022 issued 28 167 Surface 130735 1 The Shores 6/7/2012 7/9/2012 7/5/2032 Issued 38.2 1074 21.31 71.2 3620 53.7 0.71 0.0748 51.96 156 130735 1 The Shares 6/7/2012 7/9/2012 - 7/5/2032 Issued 38.2 1657 Surface 2361 7 John's Island (1.5 Mod) 4/5/2011 10/15/2012 7/2/2030 Issued 625.2 39.87 SMae 386.23 625 0011/01 0.62 1.0582 734.84 N/A 11.10 1.76 MGD 2361 7 John's Island ILO M0d) 4/5/2011 10/15/2012 7/2/2030 Issued 6252 13666 2361 7 John's Island (Lir Mod) 4/5/2011 10/15/2012 7/2/2030 Issued 625.2 203.7 9665 9 Johns Island Club 3/9/1016 6/11/2015 6/9/2035 Issued 226.2 20 255.1 227 000/0) 1.12 0.6989 485.35 N/A 9665 9lohns Island Club 3/9/2015 6/11/2015 6/9/2035 Issued 2262 55.89 Surface 9665 9Johns Island Chris 3/9/2015 6/11/2015 6/9/2035 Issued 276.2 179.21 Surface Notes 1 legend: -ASSUMED 35%68065 AREA IRRIGATED -ASSUMED 1.0 MGT/ACRE - ASSUMED I.0 MGV/AC• IRRIGATION AREA - ASSUMED IRRIGATION AREA (SEASONS). PERVIOUS AREA (SEE ATTACHED SeTE PLAN -ASSUMED IRRIGATION AREA (ORCHID COVE -561 "MICHAEL CR611" 51TE PIAN BY 585) /COMMON TRACTS TOTAL 823.274 BT KHA) • 70% a (LOTS • 40%)• 2.255 MGD RECREATION / LANDSCAPE 1RC005011. COVE. 4.219 MG0 20 Appendix C WaterCAD Model Results Scenario A: This models the current IRCDUS flow allocation (using data from December 2017 to November 2018. (Total flow allocation of 1.097 MGD: current 0.585 MGD flow to north barrier island, and available 0.512 MGD, diverted from the man made wetlands to JI): System A-1: p. EX -01 System A-2: p. EX -02 System A-3: p. EX -03 Scenario B: This models an estimated flow allocation for all current and potential future reuse customers within the IRCDUS service area and additional flow to the John's Island development. The basis of the flow allocation was estimated to be the sum of: the flow allocations of all developments with an existing SJRWMD CUP, plus an estimated flow allocation of 1.0 MGY per c of irrigated area for developments without a SJRWMD CUP, plus 1.0 MGD flow allocation for John's s a d development. (Total flow allocation of 2.964 MGD: estimated 1.964 MGD flow to north barrier islan co nities within IRCDUS service area, and an additional 1.0 MGD to JI): System B-1: p. EX -04 System B-2: p. EX -05 System B-3: p. EX -06 Scenario C: This models the same allocation into the COVB service area fo 3.116 MGD: estimated 1.964 M additional 1.0 MGD to JI, and System C-1: p. EX -07 System C-2: p. EX -08 System C-3: p. EX -09 Scenario D: This models the same estimated flow allocation as Scenario C, plus additional flow allocations into the COVB service area until the system failed. The purpose was to estimate the maximum capacity of the transmission and distribution system on the North barrier Island (Additional flows were incrementally increased in each version D-1, D-2 or D-3 below, until the system failed to deliver flows at adequate pressures. Failure was considered to be a pressure below the following: 10 psi at the top of the Wabasso bridge, 15 psi at the Sea Oaks tank, or 5 psi at Windsor). The total flow allocation varies per model below, and included an estimated 1.964 MGD flow to north barrier island communities within IRCDUS service area, additional 1.0 MGD to JI, an additional 0.153 MGD for the Shores and River Club, and additional flow allocation for the COVB service area determined below: location as Scenario 8, plus an additional flow a d River Club developments (Total flow allocation of barrier island communities within IRCDUS service area, MGD to COVB service area - the Shores and River Club): . System D-1: p. EX -10 System D-2: p. EX -11 System D-3: p. EX -12 *See pp. 6-9 for detailed explanation of systems A-1 to A-3, B-1 to B-3, C-1 to C-3, and D-1 to D-1, and see applicable graphics on pp. EX -01 to EX -12 in this appendix. 171 21 LAST SAVED: rat2019 ett12,51 PM; SAVED Sr JOHN TINAWItt DRAWING: JA2Ditrt 8-122 IRCOUS At A RE4SE MAIN C3CMPRODUCTtON DRAVVINOSLEXHICITSISCENARICI NO. lArtiODEL 'MOM: PLOT DATE:Ur/201S lit36.56 1111 11111 umiak ‘woik •"mmumn. -* firjmuma 110 ei 111111111 MA REUSE MAIN SCHULKE, BITTLE & STODDARD, L.L.C. am a STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING • !AND FUNNING • ENVIRONWEN7At PERNIMNG CEMTFICATION Cr Al1NCRIZA110X NO, OCCOSICe • 1717 INDIAN RIVER BLVD., SUITE 201 VERO BEACH, FLORIDA 32960 TEL 772)770-9822 FAX 772 / 770-9496 EMAIL infoaosengineera.uxn SYSTEM A-1 W/ DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM FROM WINDSOR TO J.I. 18-122 IRCDUS AIA Re -Use Main Analysis- APPUCABLE FOR SYSTEMS A-1, A-2 & A-3 CR 510 North to Windsor- IRCDUS Permit No Sequence No Project Name Received Date Issue Date Expiration Date Permit Status SJRWMD Project Acreage Cur Year Water Alloc.(MGY) Allocation Sources Total Allocation MGT Total Development Area Irrigation Area Irrigation IS Flow MGY/Acre MGD GPM Junction Node 8 260 9 Orchid Island John's island 160.97 ,E IlW 186.88 0.4410 306.250 22 CR 510 East to Wert - IRCDUS TOTAL 160.965 0.441 MGD Permit No Sequence No Project Name Received Date Issue Date Expiration Date Permit Status SJRWMD Project Acreage Cur Year Water Alloc.(MGY) Allocation Sources Total Allocation MGT Total Development Area Irrigation Area Irrigation % Flow MGY/Acre MGD GPM Junction Node R GPM Junction Node R John's island ,E IlW 186.88 TOTAL 0 38 0.000 MGD CR 510 South to IRCDUS Southern Limit of Service - IRCDUS Permit No Sequence No Project Name Received Date Issue Date Expiration Date Permit Status SIRWMD Project Acreage Cur Year Water Alloc.(MGY) Allocation Sources Total Allocation MGY Total Development Area Irrigation Area Irrigation % Flow MGY/Acre MGD GPM Junction Node 8 Disney's Vero Beach Resort 19.71 0.0540 37.50 17 Bermuda Club 32.85 0.0900 62.50 144 John's Island & COVB lam, 52.56 ".111.0.144 MGD IRCDUS: 0.585 MGD Permit No Sequence No Project Name Received Date Issue Date Expiration Date Permit Status SJRWMD Project Acreage Cur Yea Alloc.(M Y ater Alioca i n u s Total Allocation MGY Total Development Area Irrigation Area Irrigation % Flow MGY/Acre MGD GPM Junction Node R John's island ,E IlW 186.88 0.5120 355.56 38 'Notes & Legend: 1. ALL °ALLOCATIONS° ARE CURRENT/ EXISTING DEMANDS 23 TOTAL 186.88 0.512 MGD IRCDUS +11: 1.097 MGD LAST SAVE. 4/9/201911.41 07 AM; SAVED SY: JOHN TINAWIN: DRAWING: J. 13016115-122 IRCDUS AIA RE -USE MAIN C3CAPRODUCTION DRAWINOSIEXHIBITSLSCENARIO NO. 2A1MODEL MOM PLOT DATE: 45/20191141:16 AM • i ii NIL • INN 11111 AMR 111 1.1 1 RDA ME AA pnnym� , pnu;il8 t\tales afi,d L � .■O■■ 0001 IIIIIII IIS ■ ZIPS _yam ilia e."It_ mato ). 11 1 l4/O/ iN1 t111V!//JllIA 7.; 1111 CJ Surd goo zutifir z. i ♦nm.4.n► - - yv dI�E19m�1` i a AIMUII/MU / .Iillllillit►�� p r m m z 0 0. n 0 0 8 0 s 11*►jl 4iiiiilj7li■i► sr it #•f��MW will/ #r v 113111ir; .; all �� /I� iii 111"► m.. us ♦ 6��i11ii/►2 .. omen am ma EMs MUM �1 % �i /!ii► ..... . • 0 mos look u. p C _11111111;_ 1 s— .1/.1=orm ! :� "I 111I11111111114*` i _ 11111111111 i3 1111 r 6 c U) m D m m O N AIA REUSE MAIN SCHULKE, BITTLE & STODDARD, L.L.C. CML & SIOUCTURAC ENGINEERING • LAND PLANNING • ENVIRONMENTAL PERMI777NG CEROFlCAI10N OF AUTHORIZATION NO.: 00006866 1717 INDIAN RIVER BLVD., SUITE 201 VERO BEACH, FLORIDA 32960 TEL 772 / 770-9622 FAX 772 / 7705496 EMAIL inlc@sbsengineers.com SYSTEM A-2 W/ DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM FROM DISNEY TO J.I. 18422 IRCDUS AIA Re -Use Main Analysis • APPLICABLE FOR SYSTEMS A4, A-2 & A-3 CR 510 North to Windsor- IRCDUS Permit No Sequence No Project Name Received Date Issue Date Expiration Date Permit Status SIRWMD Project Acreage Cur Year Water AIIoc.(MGY) Allocation Sources Total Allocation MGY Total Development Area Irrigation Area irrigation % Flow MGY/Atte MGD GPM Junction Node 4 260 9 Orchid Island Disney's Vero Beach Resort \ /•,... / 160.97 a 19.71 0.4410 306.250 22 CR 510 East to West - IRCDUS TOTAL 160.965 0.441 MGD Permit No Sequence No Project Name Received Date Issue Date Expiration Date Permit Status SJRWMD Project Acreage Cur Year Water AIIoc.(MGY) Allocation Sources Total Allocation MGY Total Development Area Irrigation Area Irrigation % Flow MGY/Acre MGD GPM Junction Node R TOTAL 0.000 MGD CR 510 South to IRCDUS Southern Limit of Service- IRCDUS Pennit No Sequence No Project Name Received Date Issue Date Expiration Date Permit Status SJRWMD Project Acreage Cur Year Water AIIoc.(MGY) Allocation Sources a Total Allocation MGY Total Development Area Irrigation Area Irrigation % Flow MGY/Ave MGD GPM Junction Node it • John's Island Disney's Vero Beach Resort \ /•,... / / a 19.71 0.5120 0.0540 37.50 17 Bermuda Club Ste- 't, 32.85 0.0900 62.50 144 `TOTAL Ni, 52.56 i 1,0.144 MGD IRCDUS: 0.585 MGD John's Island & COVB Permit No Sequence No Project Name Received Date Issue Date Expiration Date Permit Status SJRWMD Project Acreage Cur Yeah ate Ailoc.IMGY � AIloca n 5d'Orcgs Total Allocation • MGT Total Development Area Irrigation Area Irrigation % Flow MGY/Acre MGD GPM Junction Node 8 John's Island \ /•,... / 186.88 0.5120 355.56 38 'Notes & Legend: 1. ALL "ALLOCATIONS" ARE CURRENT/ EXISTING DEMANDS 25 TOTAL 186.88 0.512 MGD IRCDUS*ll: 1.097 MGD LAST SAVED: V9/2019 11.49'51 AM; SAVED ED' JOHN TINAMAN: DRAVANG' .M2013118-122 IRCOUS P1A RE-U5E MAIN C301PRODUCTION DRAWINGSIEXHIBRSISCENARIO N0.3A/M002L 3AOWG. PLOT DATE' 4/9/2019 11 47.01 AM 4 tit ii Jiaul 2 EN = \\\\\\? ,,, MAI T.. == IN VOL IN L. ■— 2 IS Ng lomm ‘i- v. .A1111111111k ‘11- mum- n 1 ■r 1 IIPd_• NM ISS SIM MEEK NIMBI 11111 OU/1 1111111 "iwminim p$I IMsuire?if/P,•30---waTto law 41 1111 IuIuIu B1 rural \li�l_t111111011111111111,,, 11110 \ VI11111 Z \ •101111140,4\ 10.11.1-41•101.. ♦ 101,00 0\0. MIR .. • MN distfrirel. ft, 11 �tf id 14 1' r k\ B AIWATA Iiiiint 74 pill lit VI _}1 Ifitn :. .1 Writ, If ifi k •� ti 4, itip\ � ltlitJlt $ � �.. .,.. ,........1.„„. 4...2 , ,\,, P yr A s■11111: �. SI :anum 00 1. sit %Ay% It. . . (or A Ile II — 1• .Ir X11111-- -11► �s APVIRIV 0 8� T �1��\11111111 iUUIWf0!`- ! �11� 1111111y � 411111i� �� i1114 �411L ii 11 iniu© � p 8 c V3NV 331 N3S 8AO31VIIN31Od ONV1515,NNOf VAN 33IAM3S 5(103NI 3 0 00W 000'0 3 0 0 44 Or 411 • family 0 0 , 4011111111111112 \4* -14111111110,1 o C113 2-0 tilitur ■ O 1111 inint1oin /� NM att V3lV 33Ina3S unun sn03a1 D G 0 ILA ■ AIA REUSE MAIN SCHULKE, BITTLE & STODDARD, L.L.C. CIVIL & STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING - LAND PUNNING • ENVIRONMENTAL PERMITTING CERRRCASON OF AUD10R12AMIN NO.: 00000888 1717 INDIAN RIVER BLVD., SUITE 201 VERO BEACH, FLORIDA 32960 TEL 772 / 770.9622 FAX 772 / 770.9496 EMAIL info@sbsengineers.com SYSTEM A-3 W/O DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM @ SEA OAKS 18-122 IRCDUS A1A Re -Use Main Analysis-'APPUCABLE FOR SYSTEMS A-1, A-2 & A-3 CR 510 North to Windsor- IRCDUS Permit No Sequence No Project Name Received Date Issue Date Expiration Date Permit Status SIRWMD Project Acreage Cur Year Water Alloc.(MGY) Allocation Sources Total Allocation MGY Total Development Area Irrigation Area Irrigation % Flow MGY/Acre MGD GPM Junction Node R 260 9 Orchid Island SIRWMD Project Cur Year Water 160.97 Allocation Development 0.4410 306.250 22 TOTAL 160.965 0.441 MGD CR 610 East to West - IRCDUS Permit No Sequence No Project Name Received Date Issue Date Expiration Date Permit Status SJRWMD Project Acreage Cur Year Water Ailoc.(MGY) Allocation Sources Total Alioation MGY Total Development Area Irrigation Area irrigation % Flow MGY/Atte MIS GPM Junction Node R _ John's Island SIRWMD Project Cur Year Water Allocation Allocation Development 0.5120 355.56 38 Junction TOTAL 0 Sequence No Project Name Received Date Issue Date 0.000 MGD CR 510 South to IRCDUS Southern Limit of Service - IRCDUS John's Island & COVB Permit No Sequence No Project Name Received Date Issue Date Expiration Date Permit Status SIRWMD Project Acreage Cur Yea ater Alioc.(MGY Alloca ion 5odrees Total Total Irrigation Area Irrigation % Flow MGY/Acre MGD GPM Junction Node 4 _ John's Island SIRWMD Project Cur Year Water Allocation Allocation Development 0.5120 355.56 38 Junction Permit No Sequence No Project Name Received Date Issue Date Expiration Date Permit Status Acreage Ailoc.(MGY) Sources ,MGY Area Irrigation Area Irrigation % Flow MGY/Acre MGD GPM Node 6 Disney's Vero Beach Resort / 19.71 0.0540 37.50 17 Bermuda Club s. 32.85 0.0900 62.50 144 Y6TOT L lik, 52.56 `r ' .0.144 MGD _I IRCDUS: 0.585 MGD John's Island & COVB Permit No Sequence No Project Name Received Date Issue Date Expiration Date Permit Status SIRWMD Project Acreage Cur Yea ater Alioc.(MGY Alloca ion 5odrees Total Allocation MGY Total Development Area Irrigation Area Irrigation % Flow MGY/Acre MGD GPM Junction Node 4 John's Island w d 01w 186.88 0.5120 355.56 38 'Notes & Legend: 1. ALL "ALLOCATIONS" ARE CURRENT/ EXISTING DEMANDS 27 TOTAL 186.88 • 0.512 MGD IRCDUS*!!: 1.097 MGD LAST SAVED: 4/9/2019 11.37:55 AM; SAVED BY. JOHN T1NAWIN: DRAWING. J.12018118-1221RCDUS A1A RE -USE MAIN C30IPR000CTION DRANANOSIEXHIBITSLSCENARIO N0. 1 B'MODEL 18.01NO: PLOT DATE: 4/9/2019 11 08.03 AM 8 41 • 411. "ea 2471111 11 4 .111 ii: auM 4wiiAllhop1.4=1 ■%���ir�• /LLL `1 LE MP411111114117 INN = : , ti I LuhIL sia Nu m Now ok wog ME MI MI Eel 01 riikt wilniew_ s NINA �i �� t1/t/Illlfl 0 �tW�l�ti'IWYYI�lir t a O' IIIIII•m i z z 0 ars; 111 ',� All'►� x1111 111111 1� 11 r t '� 1111 �1111�11Ipi11l�//1: =11111�1111I= • O G1 0 rn 0 AIA REUSE MAIN SCHULKE, BITTLE & STODDARD, L.L.C. CIVIL & STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING • LAND PLANNING • ENVIRONMENTAL PERMITTING CERTIFICATION OF AUTHORIZATION NO.: 00008888 1717 INDIAN RIVER BLVD., SUITE 201 VERO BEACH, FLORIDA 32960 TEL 772 / 770-9622 FAX 772 / 770-9498 EMAIL Info@sbsengmeers.com SYSTEM B-1 W/ DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM FROM WINDSOR TO J.I. 18.122 IRCDUS ALA Re -Use Main Analysis - APPLICABLE FOR SYSTEMS B-1, B-2 & 8.3 CR 510 North to Windsor- IRCDUS Permit No Sequence No Project Name Received Date Issue Date Expiration Date Permit Status SIRWMD Project Acreage Cur Vear Water Alloc.(MGY) Allocation Sources Total Allocation MGT Total Development Area Irrigation Area Irrigation % Flow MGV/Acre MGD GPM Junction Node 6 270 4 Windsor 9/3/2013 10/11/2013 4/13/2019 Issued 230.78 98.5 Surface 241.4 416 142.9 34.4 1.69 0.6614 459.285 24 270 4 Windsor 9/3/2013 10/11/2013 4/13/2019 Issued 230.78 142.9 Surface 260 9 Orchid Island 2/20/2013 3/20/2013 3/7/2020 Issued 278.2 100.4 258.2 436 278 63.8 0.93 0.7074 491.248 22 260 9 Orchid Island 2/20/2013 3/20/2013 3/7/2020 Issued 278.2 157.8 Surface CR 510 East to West - IRCDUS TOTAL 499.6 1.369 MGD Permit No Sequence No Project Name Received Date Issue Date Expiration Date Permit Status SJRWMD Project Acreage Cur Vear Water Alloc.(MGY) Allocation Sources Total Allocation MGV Total Development Area Irrigation Area Irrigation % Flow MGY/Acre MGO GPM Junction Node 0 10001 4 Old Orchid Grove 10/25/2001 5/20/2002 5/20/2022 Issued 10.99 1.5 Surface 11.1 39.17 10.99 28.1 1.01 0.0304 21.119 150 10001 4 Old Orchid Grove 10/25/2001 5/20/2002 5/20/2022 Issued 10.99 9.6 Surface 82406 2 Marsh Island 6/7/2012 7/10/2012 6/15/2022 Issued 8.57 4 12.52 A. 27.2 8.52 31.3 1.47 0.0343 23.820 46 82406 2 Marsh Island 6/7/2012 7/10/2012 6/15/2022 Issued 8.57 8.52 Surface 2373 16 Environmental Learning Center 35.0 7/30/2001 0.0153 10.65 141 2.76 % r 2.76 51 4.6 9.0 0.60 0.0076 5.251 139 N/A 9.85 Season's at Orchid 35.0 1.00 0.0094 6.56 143 N/A f 12.79 36.03 12.79 35.5 1.00 0.0350 24.332 15 N/A 36.2 Orchid Cove (flu Micahel Creek) 35.0 1.00 0.0347 24.11 144 2351 ®%`'41 8.70 26.43 8.7 32.9 1.00 0.0238 16.553 148 N/A 126 Lewis Jungle Trail & 510 57.9 0.98 0.1964 136.42 16 2351 J ,/ 3.64 10.4 3.64 35.0 1.00 0.0100 6.925 155 TOTAL 51509 0.141 MGD CR 510 South to IRCDUS Southern Limit of Service - IRCDUS Permit No Sequence No Project Name Received Date Issue Date Expiration Date Permit Status SIRWMD Project Acreage ,.:.% Cur Year iter,, Alloc.(MG) \ / ,... N i ilatiun J Aac Spurce> Total Allocation MGY Total Development Area Irrigation Area Irrigation % Flow MGY/Acre MGD GPM Junction Node 8 4459 3 Disney's Vero Beach Resort 5/23/2002 6/28/2002 6/28/2022 Issued 8 1.4 Surface 7 22 8 36.4 0.86 0.0192 13.32 17 4459 3 Disney's Vero Beach Resort 5/23/2002 6/28/2002 6/28/2022 Issued - b N/A Disney West < `, , 9.10 26 9.10 35.0 1.00 0.0249 17.31 140 N/A Coralstone \ ( 5.60 16 5.60 35.0 1.00 0.0153 10.65 141 N/A North Shore Club • ' __ N. 345 9.85 3.45 35.0 1.00 0.0094 6.56 143 N/A Bermuda Club ,, N. " N/ 12.67 36.2 12.67 35.0 1.00 0.0347 24.11 144 2351 4 Sea Oaks 1/28/2013 2/28/2013 2/18/2023 Issued 1 25.9 Surface 71.7 126 73 57.9 0.98 0.1964 136.42 16 2351 4 Sea Oaks 1/28/2013 2/28/2013 2/18/2023 Issued ` 1 ` 45.8 N/A Grand Harbor Club / 1.61 4.6 1.61 35.0 1.00 0.0044 3.06 146 67589 2 Island Club 10/29/2003 10/29/2003 2/6/2021 Issued 5.4 9.03 45.47 97.1 45.4 46.8 1.00 0.1246 86.51 13 67589 2 Island Club 10/29/2003 10/29/2003 2/6/2021 Issued . 45.4 36.38 Surface 2238 2 Bayree Condo 11/12/1998 12/30/1998 12/30/2018 Issued 9.7 9 9 28.6 9.7 33.9 0.93 0.0247 17.12 9 John's Island & COVB TOTAL 165.5975 0.454 MGD IRCDUS: 1.964 MGD Permit No Sequence No Project Name Received Date Issue Date Expiration Date Permit Status SIRWMD Project Acreage Cur Year Water Alloc.(MGY) Allocation Sources Total Allocation MGY Total Development Area Irrigation Area Irrigation % Flow MGY/Acre MGD GPM Junction Node 6 John's Island 365.00 1.0000 694.44 38 'Notes& Legend: Inm VZ - ASSUMED 35% GROSS AREA IRRIGATED - ASSUMED 1.0 MGY/ACRE = ASSUMED 1.0 MGY/AC • IRRIGATION AREA TOTAL 365.00 1.000 MGD -ASSUMED IRRIGATION AREA (SEASONS) = PERVIOUS AREA (SEC ATTACHED SITE PIAN 8Y KHA) • 70% - ASSUMED IRRIGATION AREA (ORCHID COVE -SEE "MICHAEL CREEK" SITE PLAN BV1BS) _ (LOTS • 4033)+ RECREATION / LANDSCAPE 1.0 MGD ALLOCATION FOR JOHN'S ISLAND 29 IRCDUS*11: 2.964 MGD 6 NMMO N0.28\MOOEL 6 GRAPHIC SCALE 0 1000 1500 2000 (IN FEET) 1 inch = 1000 ft. J-143 HOR711 SHORE CLUB 00094 MOR 6181 P9 IRCDUS UTILITY SERVICE AREA COVB UT1UTY SERVICE AREA vy� 1 PRM `lam 11 �� i � _1111/ G 111 J-9 BATt1EE CONDOS 0.0347 MOD: 62.43 PS J-146 GRANO HARBOR CLUB 0.0044 MOIR 8257 P9 0.1984 .1-18 SEA OARS IICO: 6196 P9 .1-17 CONEYS YERO BEACH RESORT 0.0193 MGD; 6100 P9 J•141 CORALM0.01 MOD 6591 P9 dl rr Ire /I 11Illi(1 Mao mim •nUn111 *11 3-22 -ORCHID ISLAND 07074 WM 3679 P9 (( :�24 lill U 11111 06674:MIMEO rc11671 PS TaILEVaillill. .150 0.0300474OMO 50 � 3-155 LENS ANGIE MAIL 0.0100 MOD: 6A68 P9 .1-46 MAR91 !SAND DOM MOOR 6633 P9 .7-139 EM97MBENTAL LEAVING COMP 00076 MSO: 66.98 PS "' yi is 10 0.030MD .-67 ! .-137 70P 66 BRIDGE EL • f760' 11-1 OUTFLOW) 07161 195 HEAD PUMP 2.984 MOO FLOW 10 MO TAW( RE -USE VbLUME SUMMARY, IRCDUS SERVICE AREA JOHN'S ISLAND POTENTIAL COVB SERy� ICE AREA Mf /F TOTAL RE -USE VOLU E /L•964 MGD / 1.000 MGD / 0.000 MGD 2.964 MGD LEGEND • SERVICE NODES - EXISTING SERVICE FUTURE SERVICE EXIST. FEED FROM HOBART TANK PROP. FEED FROM HOBART TANK EXIST. FEED FROM SEA OAKS VVINTP ---- PROP. FEED FROM SEA OAKS W WTP w w (i)� G70 m Z } gOLU ZD ODw tomo co u)0 0 LL A1A REUSE MAIN EX -05 180 18-122 IRCOUS A1A Re -Use Main Analysts- APPLICABLE FOR SYSTEMS B-1, 8-2 & B-3 CR 510 North to Windsor - IRCDUS Permit No Sequence No Project Name Received Date Issue Date Expiration Date Permit Status StRWMD Project Acreage Cur Year Water AIIoc.IMGY) Allocation Sources Total Allocation MIT Total Development Area Irrigation Area Irrigation % Flow MGY/Ave MGD GPM Junction Node 4 270 4 Windsor 9/3/2013 10/11/2013 4/13/2019 Issued 230.78 965 "y 1,4 241.4 416 142.9 34.4 1.69 0.6614 459.285 24 270 4 Windsor 9/3/2013 10/11/2013 4/13/2019 Issued 230.78 142.9 Surface 260 9 Orchid Island 2/20/2013 3/20/2013 3/7/2020 Issued 278.2 100.4• 258.2 436 278 63.8 0.93 0.7074 491.248 22 260 9 Orchid Island 2/20/2013 3/20/2013 3/7/2020 Issued 278.2 157.8 Surface CR 510 East to West - IRCDUS TOTAL 499.6 1.369 MGD Permit No Sequence No Project Name Received Date Issue Date Expiration Date Permit Status 51RWMO Project Acreage Cur Year Water Alloc.IMGY) Allocation Sources Total Allocation MGY Total Development Area Irrigation Area Irrigation % Flow MGY/Ave MGD GPM Junction Node 8 10001 4 Old Orchid Grove 10/25/2001 5/20/2002 5/20/2022 Issued 10.99 1.5 "y 1,4 11.1 39.17 10.99 28.1 1.01 0.0304 21.119 150 10001 4 Old Orchid Grove 10/25/2001 5/20/2002 5/20/2022 Issued 10.99 9.6 Surface 82406 2 Marsh Island 6/7/2012 7/10/2012 6/15/2022 Issued 8.57 4 12.52 27.2 8.52 31.3 1.47 0.0343 23.820 46 82406 2 Marsh Island 6/7/2012 7/10/2012 6/15/2022 Issued 8.57 8.52 Surface 4\ 2373 Environmental Learning Center 7/30/2001 16 5.60 35.0 2.76 0.0153 2.76 51 4.6 9.0 0.60 0.0076 5.251 139 N/A /' Season's at Orchid N., N. 3.45 9.85 3.45 35.0 1.00 12.79 36.03 12.79 35.5 1,00 0.0350 24.332 15 N/A Orchid Cove (fka Micahel Creek) `‘ s f 12.67 36.2 12.67 ...NJ' \ 8.70 26.43 8.7 32.9 1.00 0.0238 16.553 148 N/A 2/18/2023 Lewis Jungle Trail & 510 161/4 '1/41 25.9 Surface - 73.7 126 f' / 3.64 10.4 3.64 35.0 1.00 0.0100 6.925 155 CR 510 South to IRCDUS Southern Limit of Service- IRCOUS AL "\51.509 V 0.141 MGD Permit No Sequence No Project Name Received Date Issue Date Expiration Date Permit Status SJRWM0 Project Acreage �iaa.,�� Cur Year tttt,,,,Z••=k Alloc.IMGN\ ,E ••\> 1M -cation Source? Total Allocation MIS Total Development Area Irrigation Area Irrigation % Flow MGY/Ave MGD GPM Junction Node 4 4059 3 Disney's Vero Beach Resort 5/23/2002 6/28/2002 6/28/2022 Issued ,8 "y 1,4 Surface 7 22 8 36.0 0.88 0.0192 13.32 17 4459 3 Disney's Vero Beach Resort 5/23/2002 6/28/2002 6/28/2022 Issued 8 8 N/A Disney West / ; J '^' ,1V 9.10 26 9.10 35.0 1.00 0.0249 17.31 140 N/A Corahtone ( -.•••=/ 5.60 16 5.60 35.0 1.00 0.0153 10.65 141 N/A North Shore Club /' -N% N., N. 3.45 9.85 3.45 35.0 1.00 0.0094 6.56 143 N/A Bermuda Club f `‘ s f 12.67 36.2 12.67 35.0 1.00 0.0347 24.11 144 2351 4 Sea Oaks 1/28/2013 2/28/2013 2/18/2023 Issued 161/4 '1/41 25.9 Surface - 73.7 126 73 57.9 0.98 0.1960 13642 16 2351 4 Sea Oaks 1/28/2013 2/28/2013 2/18/2023 Issued \ 1/ 45.8 N/A Grand Harbor Club ii 1.61 4.6 1.61 35.0 1.00 0.0044 3.06 146 67589 2 Island Club 10/29/2003 10/29/2003 2/6/2021 Issued 45.4 9.09 45.47 97.1 45.0 46.8 1.00 0.1246 86.51 13 67589 2 Island Club 10/29/2003 10/29/2003 2/6/2021 Issued 45.4 36.38 Surface 2238 2 Baytree Condo 11/12/1998 12/30/1998 12/30/2018 Issued 9.7 9 9 28.6 9.7 33.9 0.93 0.0247 17.12 9 John's Island & COVB TOTAL 165.5975 0.454 MGD IRCDUS: 1.964 MGD Permit No Sequence No Project Name Received Date Issue Date Expiration Date Permit Status SJRWMD Project Acreage Cur Year Water Alloc.(MGY) Allocation Sources Total Allocation MGY Total Development Area Irrigation Area Irrigation % Flow MGY/Acre MGD GPM Junction Node 8 John's Island 36500 1.0000 694.44 38 Notes & Legend: 00 - ASSUMED 35% GROSS AREA IRRIGATED - ASSUMED 1.0 MGY/ACRE =ASSUMED LO MGY/AC • IRRIGATION AREA TOTAL 365.00 1.000 MGD -ASSUMED IRRIGATION AREA (SEASONS) = PERVIOUS AREA (SEE ATTACHED SITE PLAN BY KHA) • 70% - ASSUMED IRRIGATION AREA (ORCHID COVE - SEE "MICHAEL CREEK" SITE PLAN BY SBS) _ (L0T5 . 41116), RECREATION / LANDSCAPE - 1.0 MGD ALLOCATION FOR JOHN'S ISLAND 31 IRCOUSa11: 2.964 MGD 9 SE MAIN C3DIRRODUCTION DRAVNNGSIEXHIBITSISCENMIO NO.9BtMODEL 4/9/201911:8 00 AM, SAVED BY: JOHN TIN GRAPHIC SCALE 0 1000 1500 2000 (IN FEET) 1Inch = 1000 ft. IRCDUS UTILITY SERVICE AREA COVB UTILITY SERVICE AREA J-9 BAYINEE CONDOS 0.0247 M60 54.55 PS .1-146 GRAND HARBOR CLUB 60044 4M 55.69 P9 4-,0 SEA OMS 0.1964 1106 85.33 P9 J- J 19AND CLUB 0.1246 MOD; 5315 PS J_743 NORM 9401E CLUB 0.0094 IRM 56.80 P9 DISNEY'S LERO BEACH RESORT 0.0192 MRF 57.03 PS CROW MAN° 07074 MOIR 2674 P9 J-24 R 06874 0.5514 IRA �,. ter\ v IIIIII► �A 111/ tr2EritEsT X146 //iJr��A41P aa249 I azo2 itioSZ P9 1w OW .1 II 0Tar c.111 r LIIIIIIIIII UMPIII i IIIiI IIilI i J-150 CLD ORCHID 690W 0.a704 MSD; 56.96 P9 .II mei J-155 LERIS JUNGLE 1RA 1R411.0.0100 NM 5668 P9 RE -USE VOLUME SUMMARY / IRCDUS SERVICE AREA /964 MGD JOHN'S ISLAND / 1.000 MGD POTENTIAL COVB SERVICE AREA / 0.000 MGD TOTAL RE -USE VOLUME / 2.960 MGD HARSH ISLAND 00343 MLEC 66.33 P9 OJ0WpaECENTERu !EARWIG CE1107 00076 MRF 85.96 PS J-87 & J-127 ' 1CP OF BRIDGE .32 LEGEND • SERVICE NODES - EXISTING SERVICE - FUTURE SERVICE - EXIST. FEED FROM HOBART TANK ---- PROP. FEED FROM HOBART TANK w u) Z Q 2po 1mw 0 0 U -1 0 0 0 1- 6a w J w -J J 2 0 0) AIA REUSE MAIN EX -06 182 18.122 IRCDUS ALA Re -Use Main Analysis - APPLICABLE FOR SYSTEMS B-1, 8-2 & B-3 CR 510 North to Windsor •IRCDUS Permit No Sequence No Project Name Received Date Issue Date Expiration Date Permit Status SIRWMD Project Acreage Cur Year Water Alloc.(MGY) Allocation Sources Total Allocation MGY Total Development Area Irrigation Area Irrigation % Flow MGY/Acre MGD GPM Junction Node R 270 4 Windsor 9/3/2013 10/11/2013 4/13/2019 Issued 230.78 98.5 Surface 241.4 416 142.9 34.4 1.69 0.6614 459.285 24 270 4 Windsor 9/3/2013 10/11/2013 4/13/2019 Issued 230.78 142.9 Surface 260 9 Orchid Island 2/20/2013 3/20/2013 3/7/2020 Issued 278.2 100.4 258.2 436 278 63.8 0.93 0.7074 491.248 22 260 9 Orchid Island 2/20/2013 3/20/2013 3/7/2020 Issued - 278.2 157.8 Surface CR 510 East to West - IRCDUS TOTAL 499.6 1.369 MGD Permit No Sequence No Project Name Received Date Issue Date Expiration Date Permit Status SIRWMD Project Acreage Cur Year Water Alloc.(MGY) Allocation Sources Total Allocation MGY Total Development Area Irrigation Area Irrigation % Flow MGY/Acre MGO GPM Junction Node 8 10001 4 Old Orchid Grove 10/25/2001 5/20/2002 5/20/2022 Issued 10.99 1.5 Surface 31.1 39.17 1099 28.1 101 0.0304 21.119 150 10001 4 Old Orchid Grove 10/25/2001 5/20/2002 5/20/2022 Issued 10.99 9.6 Surface 82406 2 Marsh Island 6/7/2012 7/10/2012 - 6/15/2022 Issued 8.57 d 12.52 27.2 8.52 313 147 0.0343 23.820 46 82406 2 Marsh Island 6/7/2012 7/10/2012 6/15/2022 Issued 8.57 832 Surface E! 2373 16 Environmental Learning Center 35.0 7/30/2001 0.0153 10.65 141 2.76 / 2.76 51 4.6 9.0 0.60 0.0076 5.251 139 N/A 9.85 Season's at Orchid 35.0 1.00 0.0094 6.56 . 143 N/A !1 12.79 36.03 12.79 35.5 1.00 0.0350 24.332 15 N/A 36.2 Orchid Cove (flu Micahet Creek) 35.0 1.00 0.0347 24.11 144 2351 ,,,N,J "r 8.70 26.43 8.7 32.9 1.00 0.0238 16.553 148 N/A 126 Lewis Jungle Trail &510 57.9 0.98 0.1969 13642 16 2351 / f ' 3.64 10.4 3.64 35.0 1.00 0.0100 6.925 155 CR 510 South to IRCDUS Southern Limit of Service - IRCDUS TOTAL 51.509 0.141 MGD Permit No Sequence No Project Name Received Date Issue Date Ezpiratlon Date Permit Status SIRWMD Project Acreage ''�� Cur Year vs at+eatio Alloc.(MG) \ J Source) Total Allocation MIS Total Development Area Irrigation Area Irrigation % Flow MGY/Acre MGD GPM Junction Node R 4459 3 Disney's Vero Beach Resort 5/23/2002 6/28/2002 6/28/2022 Issued ,8 ` \ \ 14 Surface 7 22 6 36.4 0.88 0.0192 13.32 17 4459 3 Disney's Vero Beach Resort 5/23/2002 6/28/2002 6/28/2022 Issuetl8 - \ 1 15.6 N/A Disney West N `., f _, N.r 9.10 26 9.10 35.0 1.00 0.0249 17.31 140 N/A Coralstone - \ ( "•.`T 5.60 16 5.60 35.0 1.00 0.0153 10.65 141 N/A North Shore Club _ "1,.. \ \ 3.45 9.85 3.45 35.0 1.00 0.0094 6.56 . 143 N/A Bermuda Club N1 12.67 36.2 12.67 35.0 1.00 0.0347 24.11 144 2351 4 Sea Oaks 1128/2013 2/28/2013 2/18/2023 Issued 5. N. 1) 25.9 Surface 71.7 126 73 57.9 0.98 0.1969 13642 16 2351 4 Sea Oaks 1/28/2013 2/28/2013 2/18/2023 Issued \ N All 45.8 N/A Grand Harbor Club •a f 1.61 4.6 1.61 35.0 1.00 0.0044 3.06 146 67589 2 Island Club 10/29/2003 10/29/2003 2/6/2021 Issued `..045.4 9.09 45.47 97.1 45.4 46.8 1.00 0.1246 86.51 13 67589 2 Island Club 10/29/2003 10/29/2003 2/6/2021 Issued 45.4 36.38 Surface 2238 2 Baytree Condo 11/12/1998 12/30/1998 12/30/2018 Issued 9.7 9 9 28.6 9.7 33.9 0.93 0.0247 17.12 9 John's Island & COVB TOTAL 165.5975 0.454 MGO IRCDUS: 1.964 MGD Permit No Sequence No Project Name Received Date Issue Date Expiration Date Permit Status SIRWMD Project Acreage Cur Year Water Alloc.)MGY) Allocation Sources Total Allocation MGY Total Development Area Irrigation Area Irrigation % Flow MGY/Acre MGD GPM Junction Node 4 John's Island 365.00 1.11(100 694.44 38 Notes & Legend: 00 W - ASSUMED 35% GROSS AREA IRRIGATED - ASSUMED 1.0 MGY/ACRE = ASSUMED 1.0 MGY/AC • IRRIGATION AREA TOTAL 365.00 1.000 MGD • ASSUMED IRRIGATION AREA (SEASONS) = PERVIOUS AREA (SEE ATTACHED SITE PIAN 8Y MIA) • 7096 -ASSUMED IRRIGATION AREA (ORCHID COVE - SEE "MICHAEL CREEK" SITE PLAN BY 585) _ (LOTS • 4096) * RECREATION / LANDSCAPE -1.0 MGD ALLOCATION FOR JOHN'S ISLAND 33 IRCDUS • 1I: 2.964 MGD C3DIPRODUCTION DRAWINGSIEXHIBITSIWCENARIO NO.1C1MODEL 1C.DWC; PLOT DATE 4/9/2019 1 01516122 IRCOUS AIA RE•U LAST SAVED. 402019 9:19 45 AM; SAVED BY: JOHN TINAWIN: ORA GRAPHIC SCALE 0 1000 1500 2000 (IN FEET( l inch= 1000 ft. IRCDUS UTILITY SERVICE AREA COVB UTIUTY SERVICE AREA J-9 BAY1REE CONDOS 0.6247 61.9.1 J-36 JOHN'S ISLAND MOM 77.74 P9 J-146 GRAND HARBOR CLUB 0.0044 MOM 5130 P9 J-10 0.1964 Wet 75.56 P9 .1-13 ISLAND CLUB 0.1246 MOM 8252 P9 J-143 NORM 91011E CLUB 0.0094 Alla 0456 P9 J-156 SHORES 6.0745 MW n.7 1%111N .1-17 019EYS VERO BEACH RESORT 0.0192 MOM 54.59 P9 PROPOSED .10 MD TANK 0-151 SEA ONES 9W7P W5 m OEM J-141 CCRALSTONE 0.0104 MGM 9457 P9 r40 DISNEY 6 X49 AKA 5419 P9 1111111 1111 III J-22 - ORCHID ISLAND Q7074 MOM 19-47 P9 J-24 :114IOSOR 65514 MOM{ 7.39 P9 1311r.- I J-15 SEASONS6. MW; 54.00 P9 RE -USE VOLUME SUMMARY IRCDUS SERVICE AREA J-150 OLD ORCHID GR0W 60.704 AICD; 56.00 P9 J-155 LEVIS MOLE TRAIT. 0.0100 11G0. 6640 P9 JOHN'S ISLAND POTENTIAL COVB SERVICE AREA TOTAL RE -USE VOLUIvE J-46 MAWS 19AN0 Q0343 MSD; 64.70 P9 J-1.19 EMMMMIFMAL LEARNING OE747ER 0.0075 MIM 5.170 P9 .1-57 ! .7-127 70P OF ORIODF EL - 27Q0' .34 3.116 MGD LEGEND • SERVICE NODES - EXISTING SERVICE FUTURE SERVICE - EXIST. FEED FROM HOBART TANK ---- PROP. FEED FROM HOBART TANK - EXIST. FEED FROM SEA OAKS W WTP ---- PROP. FEED FROM SEA OAKS W WTP 0 J J 0 0 0 0 V) 5ES w m w -J J 2 0 0) A1A REUSE MAIN EX -07 184 10-122 IRCDUS A1A Re -Use Main Analysis - APPLICABLE FOR SYSTEMS C-1, C-2 & C-3 CR 510 North to Windsor - IRCDUS Permit No Sequence No Project Name Received Date Issue Date Expiration Date Permit Status SIRWMD Project Acreage Cur Year Water Alloc.(MGY) Allocation Sources Total Allocation MGY Total Development Area Irrlgatlon Area Irrigation % Flow MGY/Acre MGD GPM Junction Node R 270 4 Windsor 9/3/2013 10/11/2013 4/13/2019 Issued 230.78 98.5 1.8 241.4 416 142.9 34.4 1.69 0.6614 459.285 24 270 4 Windsor 9/3/2013 10/11/2013 4/13/2019 Issued 230.78 142.9 Surface 260 9 Orchid Island 2/20/2013 3/20/2013 3/7/2020 Issued 278.2 100.4 256.2 436 278 63.8 0.93 0.7074 491.248 22 260 9 Orchid Island 2/20/2013 3/20/2013 3/7/2020 Issued 278.2 157.8 Surface CR 510 East to West- IRCDUS TOTAL 499.6 1.369 MGD Permit No Sequence No Project Name Received Date Issue Date Expiration Date Permit Status SJRWMD Project Acreage Cur Year Water Alloc.(MGY) Allocation Sources Total Allocation M00 Total Development Area Irrigation Area Irrigation% Flow MGY/Acre MGD GPM Junction Node0 10001 4 Old Orchid Grove 10/25/2001 5/20/2002 5/20/2022 Issued 10.99 1,5 1.8 11.1 39.17 10.99 28.1 1.01 0.0304 21.119 150 10001 4 Old Orchid Grove 10/25/2001 5/20/2002 5/20/2022 issued 10.99 9.6 Surface 82406 2 Marsh Island 6/7/2012 7/10/2012 6/15/2022 Issued 8.57 4 12.52 27.2 8.52 31.3 1.47 0.0343 23.820 46 82406 2 Marsh Island 6/7/7012 7/10/2012 6/15/2022 Issued 8.57 8.52 Surface 2373 ai15,60Ma Environmental learning Center 5.60 7/30/2001 1.00 Mae 0.0153 10.65 2.76 N/A 2J85 51 4.6 9.0 0.60 0.0076 5.251 139 N/A Roil 145 is Season's at Orchid 3.45 35.0 1.00 0.0094 6.56 143 N/0 101112.79 i 36.03 -=12.79 - ------ 35.5 - ktmeit1.00 Rama- 0.0350 24.332 15 N/A 12.67&6 Orchid Cove (fka Micahel Creek) 12.67 - 35.0 �rxaer 1.00 moo 0.0347 24.11 144 2351 Mil 8.70 PM 26.43 1/28/2013 2/28/2013 2/18/2023 Issued 16553 148 N/A 71.7 Lewis Jungle Trail &510 73 57.9 0.98 0.1964 136.42 16 .S m3,64 gm 10.4 3.64 35.0 -.".'.w"Ox1.00 NeNte, 0.0100 6.925 155 CR 510 South to IRCDUS Southern Limit of Service - IRCDUS FdTAt 0.141 51!509 Permit No Sequence No Project Name Received Date Issue Date Expiration Date Permit Status SJRWMD Project Acreage Cur Year Water Alloc.(MGY) �3 Allocotian� total - A)ocatlon M YG Total Development Area Irrlgatlon Area Irrigation% Flow MGY/Acre MGD GPM Junction 9040 bree5 4459 3 Disney's Vero Beach Resort 5/23/2002 6/28/2002 6/28/2022 Issued B 1.8 510(n-ix/IBM ➢ 7 22 B 36.4 0.88 0.0192 13.32 17 4459 3 Disney's Vero Beach Resort 5/23/2002 6/28/2002 6/28/2022 Issued 8 .., 5.6 MAY v N/A Carlton River Club Disney West 7/20/2017 5/22/2022 Issued 28 9.8 28.5 MR9,10M 26 9.10 35.0 1.00 NOM 0.0249 17.31 140 N/6 Carlton River Club Coralstone 7/20/2017 5/22/2022 Issued 28 18.7 Surface 3661 ai15,60Ma 16 5.60 35.0 1.00 Mae 0.0153 10.65 141 N/A b ice- Roil 145 is 9.85 3.45 35.0 1.00 0.0094 6.56 143 N/0 BNorth emwda Club Bermuda Club ,,,m1;-'41"". � i •f 12.67&6 36.2 12.67 - 35.0 �rxaer 1.00 moo 0.0347 24.11 144 2351 4 Sea Oaks 1/28/2013 2/28/2013 2/18/2023 Issued i Mk .9 Surface 71.7 126 73 57.9 0.98 0.1964 136.42 16 2351 4 Sea Oaks 1/28/2013 2/28/2013 2/18/2023 Issued 71 5.8 N/A Grand Harbor Club SIM 1.61 MS 4.6 1.61 35.0 ,.++flat:+1.00 raIN ., 0.0044 3.06 146 67589 2 Island Club 10/29/2003 10/29/2003 2/6/2021 Issued M45.4 9.09 45.47 97.1 45.4 46.8 1.00 0.1246 86.51 13 67589 2 Island Club 10/29/2003 10/29/2003 2/6/2021 Issued 15.4'' 36.38 Surface 2238 2 0395380 Condo 11/12/1998 12/30/1998 12/30/2018 Issued 9) e 9 9 28.6 9,7 33.9 0.93 0.0247 17.12 9 John's island & COVB TOTAL 165.5975 0.454 MGD IRCDUS: ' 1.964 MGD Permit No MINIININ Sequence No 1111111=1 Project Name John's Island ® Received Date ®illa Issue Date Expiration Date PermitStatus 11•111 SIRWMD Project Acreage Cur Year Water Alloc.(MGY) Allocation Sources 1111.1 Total Allocation MGY MP Total Development Area IIMOPIM=HE Irrlgatlon Area Irrigation % IIIM Flow MGY/Acre MIIIIIe MGD 1.0000 GPM 8694.441 Junction Node d I.38•11 130735 1 The Shores 6/7/2012 7/9/2012 7/5/2032 Issued aMNIIIII 38.2 10.74 111365.00 27.31 71.2 38.20 53.7 0.71 0.0748 53.96 156 130735 1 The Shores 6/7/2012 7/9/2012 7/5/2032 Issued 38.2 16.57 Surface 70018 2 Carlton River Club 7/5/2017 7/20/2017 5/22/2022 Issued 28 9.8 28.5 135 28.19 20.9 1.01 00761 54.22 157 70018 2 Carlton River Club 7/5/7017 7/20/2017 5/22/2022 Issued 28 18.7 Surface Notes & Leg nd: - ASSUMED 35%00055 AREA IRRIGATED - ASSUMED 1.0 MGY/ACRE = ASSUMED 1.0 MGY/AC • IRRIGATION AREA TOTAL 420.81 1.153 MGD - ASSUMED IRRIGATION AREA (SEASONS). PERVIOUS AREA (SEE ATTACHED SITE PLAN BY KHA) • 70% -ASSUMED IRRIGATION AREA (ORCHID COVE - SEE "MICHAEL CREEK" SITE PLAN 8Y SUS) _ (LOTS • 40%) a RECREATION / LANDSCAPE - 1.0 MGD ALLOCATION FOR JOHN'S ISLAND 35 IRCDUS a COVB all: 3.116 MGD DRANINGS\EXHIBIT8l4CENARIO NO.2C1MODEL 2C.D4AG; PLOT DATE 4/9/2019 11 41:19 AM fi GRAPHIC SCALE 0 1000 1500 2000 IsTz IN FEET J finch= 1000 ft. '7-143 NORTH SHORE CLUB 00094 MOM 8191 P9 IRCDUS UT1UTY SERVICE AREA COVB UT1UTY SERVICE AREA J-38 431411'S ISLAND 1.0000 YOM 7741 PSI BAYO7EE CONDO 0.0247 MOM 81.90 P9 4-146 HARBOR 0.0044 A 81J08P9 J -16 SEA OARS 0.1964 ISM 8195 P9 4-13 ISLWD 007 0.1246 M� 8169 J-17 DISNEY'S 1890 BEACH RESORT 0.m92 MOM 8169 P9 J-144 34.OA CLUB 710 0.0347 Mm: 6392 P9 PROPOSED .10 YD TANG J-151 SEA OAKS MP 4-141 CORALS70NE 00163 MGP. 8191 P9 r ■ �...� it PROP ••- .,.:.1.�_� ..■ .....r......• IN ...IiI ....� it Pa al inure P9 °C�11/ il1A... UN ■.■■....w �CCr1111 Ow. 111111 norXII 1111 111\\� : 1 Miiirop, dr, II 44* SO 141/ =4:.♦;" � 11 Els �'61i1or '7-156 110740 MOt 7740 P9 l-/ 4-22 - ORCHD SURD 127074 MEA 25.07 P9 - 4-24 Q66l4 R 0.6814 MCA 101111111111111111 11 J 11(ili 4-15 SEASONS 0 GRC19O 710350 Ma, 66.00 P9 4-150 OLD ORCNID GROVE 04504 NM 5680 P9 4-155 mos JINGLE MAIL 0.0100 ERA 56.79 P9 RE -USE VbLUME SUMMARY / IRCDUS SERVICE AREA JOHN'S ISLAND POTENTIAL COVB SERVICE AREA TOTAL RE -USE VOLUME / 4-48 HARSH ISLAND 0.0.313 MEA 64.11 P9 J-139 E10190111ENTAL LEARNING CEN1ER MOM M 8170 P9 .36 0.964 MGD / 1.000 MGD / 0.153 MGD 3.116 MGD LEGEND • SERVICE NODES - EXISTING SERVICE - FUTURE SERVICE ▪ EXIST. FEED FROM HOBART TANK PROP. FEED FROM HOBART TANK - EXIST. FEED FROM SEA OAKS WNTP ▪ PROP. FEED FROM SEA OAKS OW4TP U J 0 cc 0 0 0 w w J 2 Cf) A1A REUSE MAIN EX -08 186 18-122 IRCDUS A1A Re -Use Main Analysis - APPLICABLE FDR SYSTEMS C-1, C-2 & C-3 CR 510 North to Windsor - IRCDUS Permit No Sequence No Project Name Received Date Issue Date Expiration Date Permit Status SIRWMD Project Acreage Cur Year Water Alloc.(MGY) Allocation Sources Total Allocation MGY Total Development Area Irrigation Area Irrigation% Flow MGY/Acre MGD GPM Junction Node** 270 4 Windsor 9/3/2013 10/11/2013 4/13/2019 Issued 230.78 98.5 Sbrface/ 241.4 416 142.9 34.4 1.69 0.6614 459.285 24 270 4 Windsor 9/3/2013 10/11/2013 4/13/2019 Issued 230.78 142.9 Surface 260 9 Orchid Island 2/20/2013 3/20/2013 3/7/2020 Issued 278.2 100.4 1 258.2 436 278 63.8 0.93 0.7074 493.248 22 260 9 Orchid Island 2/20/2013 3/20/2013 3/7/2020 Issued 278.2 157.8 Surface TOTAL 4996 1.369 MGD CR 510 East to West - IRCDUS Permit No Sequence No Project Name Received Date Issue Date Expiration Date Permit Status SIRWMD Project Acreage Cur Veer Water Alloc.(MGY) Allocation Sources Total Allocation MIT Total Development Area Irrigation Area Irrigation % Flow MGY/Acre MGD GPM Junction Node # 10001 4 Old Orchid Grove 10/25/2001 5/20/2002 5/20/2022 Issued 10.99 1.5 Sbrface/ 11.1 39.17 10.99 28.1 1.01 0.0300 21.119 150 10001 4 Old Orchid Grove 10/25/2001 5/20/2002 5/20/2022 Issued 10.99 9.6 Surface 82406 2 Marsh Island 6/7/2012 7/10/2012 6/15/2022 Issued 8.57 4 1 12.52 27.2 8.52 31.3 1.47 0.0343 33.820 46 82406 2 Marsh Island 6/7/2012 7/10/2012 6/15/2022 Issued 8.57 8.52 Surface 2373 16 Environmental Learning Center 35.0 7/30/2001 0.0153 10.65 141 2.76 $366 51 4.6 9.0 0.60 0.0076 5.251 139 N/A 9.85 Season's at Orchid 35.0 ,,,,LLARte 1.00 Warta. 00094 6.56 143 N/A 135 06412.79 36.03 - 12.79, . - =, 35.5 ., ocao,, 4.00 000000 0.0350 24.332 15 N/A 36.2 Orchid Cove(fka Micahel Creek) 35.0 --.e.taa 1.00a 0.0347 24.11 144 2351 4 .9I, 8.70 SW 26.43 r . -. 8.7 ., -_ 32.9 .t,asa 1.003oA07• 0.0238 16.553 148 N/A 126 Lewis Jungle Trail & 510 57.9 0.98 0.1964 136.42 16 2351 ,s,5 3,64 Atte 10.4 3.64 35.0 '73'1.00'.0 0.0100 6.925 155 CR 510 South to IRCDUS Southern Limit of Service - IRCDUS L 500509 , 0.141 MGD Permit No Sequence No Project Name Received Date Issue Date Expiration Date Permit Status SIRWMD Project Acreage Cur Year Water Alloc.(MGY) source �lloytion TT 1ao.,tal (ncation Total Development Area Irrigation Area Irrigation % Flow MGV/Acre MGD GPM Junction Node# 4459 3 Disney's Vero Beach Resort 5/23/2002 6/28/2002 6/28/2022 Issued 8 1. Sbrface/ 7 22 8 36.4 0.88 0.0192 13.32 17 4459 3 Disney's Vero Beach Resort 5/23/2002 6/28/2002 6/28/2022 Issued 8 5.6 Sourced N/A Area Disney West Irrigation % Flow MGY/Acre MGD GPM Node ** AmIlk , ,�� 1 ;R9.10 H&'a. 26 9.10 35.0 ;,bksl:v1.004360V 0.0249 17.31 140 5/0 71.2 Coralstone 53.7 0.73 MIM1.0000 0.0748 4694.441 51.% =381 156 , 1 388115.60 1 16 5.60 35.0 ,00403. 1.00 H931' 0.0153 10.65 141 N/A North Shore Club . SIN... II1R7 ,'13.450064 9.85 3.45 35.0 ,,,,LLARte 1.00 Warta. 00094 6.56 143 N/A 135 Bermuda Club 20.9 1.01 0.0781 54.22 �'y- 70018 2 W312.678@0 36.2 12.67 35.0 --.e.taa 1.00a 0.0347 24.11 144 2351 4 Sea Oaks 1/28/2013 2/28/2013 2/18/2023 Issued 1 � i .9 Surface 71.7 126 73 57.9 0.98 0.1964 136.42 16 2351 4 5e0 Oaks 1/28/2013 2/28/2013 2/18/2023 Issued 1 45.8 5/4 Grand Harbor Club.S ' 1.61 4.6 1.61 35.0 ..1,109.11.00363S% 0.0044 3.06 146 67589 2 Island Club 10/29/2003 10/29/2003 2/6/2021 Issued'41 73,4 9,09 45.47 97.1 450 46.8 1.00 0.1246 86.51 13 67589 2 Island Club 10/29/2003 10/29/2003 2/6/2021 Issued °°��y��y A '' 36.38 Surface 2238 2 Baytree Condo 11/12/1998 12/30/1998 12/30/2018 Issued 19 9 9 28.6 9.7 33.9 0.93 0.0247 17.12 9 TOTAL 165.5975 0.454 MGD John's bland & COVB IRCDUS: 1.964 MGD Notes & Legend: 00 - ASSUMED 35% GR05S AREA IRRIGATED -ASSUMED 1.0 MGY/ACRE =ASSUMED 1.0 MGV/AC • IRRIGATION AREA TOTAL 420.81 1.153 MGD -ASSUMED IRRIGATION AREA (SEASONS). PERVIOUS AREA (SEE ATTACHED SITE PLAN BY 636) • 70% - ASSUMED IRRIGATION AREA (ORCHID COVE - SEE "MICHAEL CREEK" SITE PLAN BY SBS) _ (LOTS • 40%), RECREATION / LANDSCAPE -1,0 MGD ALLOCATION FOR JOHN'S 15LAN0 37 IRCDUS +COVE ♦ JI: 3.116 MGD Total Total SJRWMD Project Cur Year Water Allocation Allocation Development Junction Permit No '1.111111 Sequence No MI1111 Project Name John'sl,land Received Date Issue Date Expiration Date 0,01110111010s Acreage Alloc.(MGY) Sourced MGT Area irrigation Area Irrigation % Flow MGY/Acre MGD GPM Node ** 130735 1 The Shores 6/7/2012 7/9/2012 0 7/5/2032 I Issued 38.2 10.74 IMINIMI •365.001 2731 71.2 38.20 53.7 0.73 MIM1.0000 0.0748 4694.441 51.% =381 156 130735 1 The Shores 6/7/2012 7/9/2012 7/5/2032 Issued 38.2 16.57 Surface 70018 2 Carlton River Club 7/5/2017 7/20/2017 5/22/2022 Issued 28 9.8 285 135 28.19 20.9 1.01 0.0781 54.22 157 70018 2 Carlton River Club 7/5/2017 7/20/2017 5/22/2022 Issued 28 18.7 Surface Notes & Legend: 00 - ASSUMED 35% GR05S AREA IRRIGATED -ASSUMED 1.0 MGY/ACRE =ASSUMED 1.0 MGV/AC • IRRIGATION AREA TOTAL 420.81 1.153 MGD -ASSUMED IRRIGATION AREA (SEASONS). PERVIOUS AREA (SEE ATTACHED SITE PLAN BY 636) • 70% - ASSUMED IRRIGATION AREA (ORCHID COVE - SEE "MICHAEL CREEK" SITE PLAN BY SBS) _ (LOTS • 40%), RECREATION / LANDSCAPE -1,0 MGD ALLOCATION FOR JOHN'S 15LAN0 37 IRCDUS +COVE ♦ JI: 3.116 MGD 4 GS,EXNIBITSISCENARIO NO. k1 DRAWING: J.12012416 2019 11 M:56 AM; SAVED BY: JO GRAPHIC SCALE 0 1000 1500 2000 (IN FEET) 1 inch = 1000 ft. IRCDUS UTILITY SERVICE AREA COVB uTlUTY SERVICE AREA J-0 0.0247 M001 50.50. .-140 GRARO HMOI7 CMB 0.0044 MOD 5219 P9 .1-7S SEA OARS 07054 MOO; 53.24 P9 .-N ISMO CU9 0.1245 MOP, 51.51 P9 .-143 NOM 9109E CLUB 00094 MOD: 5557 P9 .-17 09dE1'S VERO BEACH RESORT 0.0192 NOD 5.188 P9 .-144 5575875 5 00347 MODLS 5545 P9 J-147 CORALSTONE 00752 0.0153 MOP. 5557 P9, If tit J-22 GRIM ISLAND 0.7074 MGD 25.51 PSL 4-24 1966542 0.5514 MGD IAla1 Iuu1= uunc Otilr �rlllrl 2212/01/ _. 2521252///5 155525525/u 225255555 .1-150 CD MCAD GROW 00304 MIS 58.00 P9 SEASONS 0 CROW 0.0350 10D 50.00 P9 .010• JUNGLE 0 AKA 56 0. 79 P9 MARSH I4 0.034.7 7700 84. 1 PS F74MRa.9ENTAL LEA147N0 654169 0.0076 AM 63.70 PST .1-139 ?(OUTFLOW) MART TANK (UT20 FLO0 7•i11Yf 195 NM PILAW 5118 MGD FLOW 0.5 RE -USE VQLUME SUMMARY / IRCDUS SERVICE AREA .964 MGD JOHN'S ISLAND 1.000 MGD /0.153 POTENTIAL COVB SERVICE AREA MGD TOTAL RE -USE VOLUME / 3.116 MGD LEGEND • SERVICE NODES - EXISTING SERVICE - FUTURE SERVICE - EXIST. FEED FROM HOBART TANK ---- PROP. FEED FROM HOBART TANK U J J 0 cc 0 0 0 1- (i] oS w m w J U AIA REUSE MAIN EX -09 188 18-122 IRCDUS AIA Re -Use Main Anoksis • APPLICABLE FOR SYSTEMS 0.1, C•2 & C•3 CR 010 North to Windsor- IRCDUS Perm0 No Sequence No Project Name Received Date Issue Date Expiration Date Permit Status SIRWMD Project Acreage Cur Year Water Altoc(MGY) Allocation Sources Total Allocation MGY Total Development Area Irrigation Area IrdgatIon% Flow MGY/Acre MGD GPM Junction Node*/ 270 4 Windsor 9/3/2013 10/11/2013 4/13/2019 Issued 230.78 98.5 Sbj18t/J'-�' 241.4 416 142.9 34.4 1.69 0.6614 459.285 24 270 4 Windsor 9/3/2013 10/11/2013 4/13/2019 Issued 230.78 142.9 Surface 260 9 Orchid Island 2/20/2013 3/20/2013 3/7/2020 Issued 270.2 100.4 _. 258.2 436 278 63.8 0.93 0.7074 491.248 22 260 9 Orchid Island 2/20/2013 3/20/2013 3/7/2020 Issued 278.2 157.8 Surface TOTAL 499.6 1.369 MGD CR 510 East to West - IRCDUS Permit No Sequence No Protect Name Received Date Issue Date Expiration Date Permit Status SJRWMD Project Acreage Cur Year Water Altoc(MGY) Allocation Sources Total Allocation MGY Total Development Area Ircigetlon Area Irrigation% Flow MGY/Acre MGD GPM Junction Nodea 10001 4 Old Orchid Grove 10/25/2001 5/20/2002 5/20/2022 issued 10,99 1.5 Sbj18t/J'-�' 11.1 39.17 10.99 28.1 1.01 0.0304 21.119 150 10001 4 Old Orchid Grove 10/25/2001 5/20/2002 5/20/7022 Issued 10.99 9.6 Surface 82406 2 Marsh Island 6/7/2012 7/10/2012 6/15/2072 Issued 8.57 4 F ( 12.52 27.2 8.52 31.3 1.47 0.0343 23.820 46 82406 2 Marsh Island 6/7/7012 7/10/2012 6/15/2022 Issued 8.57 8.52 Surface 2373 I6 Environmental Learning Center 35.0 7/30/2001 0.0153 10.65 141 2.76 2 2.781 51 4.6 9.0 0.60 0.0076 5.251 139 N/A 9.85 Season's at Orchid 35.0 1.00 0.0094 636 143 N/A 12.79 36.03 12.79 35.5 1.00 0.0350 24.332 15 N/A 36.2 Orchid Cove (Aa Micahei Creek) 35.0 1.00 0.0347 24.11 144 2351 4 8.70 26.43 8.7 32.9 1.00 0.0238 16.553 148 N/A 126 Lew1,1ungle Trail & 510 57.9 0.98 0.1961 136.42 16 2351 v 3.64 10.4 3.64 35.0 1.00 0.0100 6.925 155 CR 510 South to IRCDUS Southern Umit of Service • IRCDUS TOTA2 511109/2 4/ 0.141 MBD V Permit No Sequence No Project Name Received Date hsue Date Expiration Date Permit Status SIRWMD Project Acreage Cur Year Water(/ Afloc(MGY) ` Alkcotlon� Sotireelitaa.. otal A ation MG Total Development Area Initiation Area Irrigation 96 Flow MGY/Axe MGD GPM Junction Node 4459 3 Disney4 Vero Beach Resort 5/23/2002 6/28/2002 6/28/3022 hi8ed 8 1,9 Sbj18t/J'-�' 7 22 B 36.4 0.88 0.0192 13.32 17 4459 3 Disney's Vero Beach Resort 5/23/2002 6/28/2002 6/28/2022 issued 8 6 fw±'/ _' N/A 71.2 Disney West 53.7 0.71 0.0748 51.96 156 4,0/"4. F ( 9.10 26 9.10 35.0 1.00 0.0249 17.31 140 N/A 2 Corehtone 7/5/2017 7/20/2017 5/22/2022 Issued 28 p"- }- N-45.60 28.5 I6 5.60 35.0 3.00 0.0153 10.65 141 N/A 2 North Shore Club 7/5/2017 7/20/2017 5/22/2022 Issued 28 NZ.V.9*ci</ ''9 3,45 9.85 3.45 35.0 1.00 0.0094 636 143 N/A Bermuda Club AR3/t ss. N:71A 32.67 36.2 12.67 35.0 1.00 0.0347 24.11 144 2351 4 Sea Oaks 1/28/2013 2/28/2013 2/18/2023 Issued ,/,-;.1,-71 � vE'' 9 3udace 73.7 126 73 57.9 0.98 0.1961 136.42 16 2351 4 Sea Oaks 1/28/2013 2/28/2013 2/18/2023 Issued 71 '- 5.8 N/A Grand Harbor Club `,..-N r 1.61 4.6 1.61 35.0 1.00 0.0044 3.06 146 67589 2 Island Club 10/29/2003 10/29/2003 2/6/2021 Issued ", 4,6 `' 9.09 45.47 97.1 45.4 468 1.00 0.1246 86.51 13 67589 2 Island Club 10/29/2003 10/29/2003 2/6/2021 Issued 454 #' 36.38 Surface 2238 2 64731ee Condo 11/12/1998 12/30/1998 17/30/7018 Issued 977 9 9 28.6 9.7 33.9 0.93 0.0247 17.12 9 TOTAL 165.5975 0.454 MGO John's bland & COVE IRCDUS: 1.964 MGD Permit No Sequence No Project Name Received Date Issue Date Expiration Date Permit Status SJRWMD Project Acreage Cur Year Water Alloc.(MGY) Allocation Sources Total Allocation MGY Total Development Area Irrigation Area Irrigation% Flaw MGY/Arte MGD GPM Junction Node 8 John's Island . ' 365.00 1.0000 694.44 _ 38 130735 1 The Shores 6/7/2012 7/9/2012 7/5/2032 Issued 33.2 10.74 27.31 71.2 38.20 53.7 0.71 0.0748 51.96 156 130735 1 The Shores 6/7/2012 7/9/2012 7/5/2032 Issued 38.2 16.57 Surface 70018 2 Carlton River Club 7/5/2017 7/20/2017 5/22/2022 Issued 28 9.8 --- - 28.5 135 28.19 20.9 1.01 0.0781 54.22 157 70018 2 Carlton RNer CNb 7/5/2017 7/20/2017 5/22/2022 Issued 28 18.7 Surface Notes & Legend: - ASSUMED 35% GROSS AREA IRRIGATED - ASSUMED 1.0 MGY/ACRE =ASSUMED 1.0 MGY/AC • IRRIGATION AREA TOTAL 420.81 1.153 0300 - ASSUMED IRRIGATION AREA (SEASONS) • PERVIOUS AREA (SEE ATTACHED SITE PLAN BY101.4) • 7094 - ASSUMED IRRIGATION AREA (ORCHID COVE - SEE 'MICHAEL CREEK' SITE PUN 8Y 186) _ (LOTS • 40)3)+ RECREATION / LANDSCAPE - 1.0 MGD ALLOCATION FOR JOHN'S ISLAND 39 IRCDUS+COVE+lb 3.116 0350 8.122 IRCOUS Al A REUSE MAIN C301PR GRAPHIC SCALE 0 1000 1500 2000 (IN FEET ) IInch = 1000 k. IRCDUS UTILITY SERVICE AREA COVB UTILITY SERVICE AREA YIREE CONDOSS 9A 00247 WGO 7510 P57 J-3 POTENTIA. 0019 ALLOCATICH 0.6120 MGR 6517 P9 GIUND _.1-146 CLUB 00044 1100 80.87 POTENTIAL COl9 ALLOCATION- - 06120 MOR 69.68 P9 .1-150 JOHN'S STAID 1.0000 MOR 84.78 PSL J-16 SEA 0465 0.1864 MOR 7157 PSL .-143 0.0094g SWORE 2-13 STAID 0212 01246 MOR 76.59 P9 3-17 O19JEY'S 1980 MICR RESORT 0.0192 MOR 54.50 P51 PROPOSED 10 MD TANN 0-151 SEA OAKS IMP 4.199 aCt .1-22 OROm ISLAND 0.7074 MGO 19.39 P9 2-24 WINDSOR - 06814 M0} L7.30 P9] 2-141 CORA.STOIIE 0.010.7 MGR 64.48 PSL J- 40 1.11 .::�.: 0.0249 MDISNEY GC 5450. P9��! 11.1 Mal ■ 11111111MMIMPLI 1111 ■INN= J-15 SEAtSDVS 0 OROW 0.0360 WO; 27.63 PSL LIMITING FACTOR IS PSI AT TANK RE -USE V T U I ITTTfI I I F .1-150 00 ORCHID 0201£ 00304 MGR 27.83 PSL .-155 LENS JINGLE TRAIL 0.070016,'0 29.3* P9 IRCDUS SERVICE AREA LUME SUMMARY JOHN'S ISLAND POTENTIAL COVB SERI'ICE AREA TOTAL RE -USE VOLUME 2-148 OR0ND COTE MARSH ISLAND 0.0343 MOR 42.95 PSL 2-139 EN*WONEENTAL !EARNING CENTER 0.0078 MOD; 42.14 P9 .1-87 It 2-127 IOP OF BRIDGE fa0 R-1 (OUTFLOW) OUR (O 30 MO MAW 195 HEAD PUMP 4.340 MGD FLOW o 14636 MGD /1.0000 MGD / 1.3769 MGD 4.3405 MGD LEGEND • SERVICE NODES - EXISTING SERVICE - FUTURE SERVICE EXIST. FEED FROM HOBART TANK ---- PROP. FEED FROM HOBART TANK - EXIST. FEED FROM SEA OAKS W WIP ---- PROP. FEED FROM SEA OAKS VWV7P 2 LU �� >O w�cl O COO CO Z 0 LL LL 0 0 0 0 0 V/ 06 W -J m LU J CD AIA REUSE MAIN EX -10 190 18-122 IRCDUS A1A Re -Use Main Analysis - APPLICABLE FOR SYSTEM D-1 CR 510 North to Windsor- IRCDUS Permit No Sequence No - Project Name Received Date Issue Date Expiration Date Permit Status SJRWMD Project Acreage Cur Year Water Alloc.(MGY) Allocation Sources Total Allocation MGT Total Development Area irrigation Area Irrigation % Flow MGY/Ave MGD GPM Junction Node 8 270 4 Windsor 9/3/2013 10/11/2013 4/13/2019 Issued 230.78 98.5 Sur dce"j 243,4 416 142.9 34.4 1.69 0.6614 459.285 24 270 4 Windsor 9/3/2013 10/11/2013 4/13/2019 Issued 230.78 142.9 Surface 260 9 Orchid Island 2/20/2013 3/20/2013 3/7/2020 Issued 278.2 100.4 1 258.2 436 278 63.8 0.93 - - 0.7074 491.248 22 260 9 Orchid Island • 2/20/2013 3/20/2013 3/7/2020 Issued 278.2 157.8 Surface CR 510 East to West- IRCDUS TOTAL 499.6 1.369 MGD Permit No Sequence No Project Name Received Date Issue Date Expiration Date Permit Status SJRWMD Project Acreage Cur Year Water Alloc.(MGY) Allocation Sources Total Allocation MGT Total Development Area Prigat1on Area Irrigation% Flow MGV/Acre MGD GPM Junction Nodea 10001 4 Old Orchid Grove 10/25/2001 5/20/2002 5/20/2022 Issued 10.99 1.5 Sur dce"j 11.1 39.17 10.99 28.1 1.01 -0.0304 21.119 150 10001 4 Old Orchid Grove 10/25/2001 5/20/2002 5/20/2022 Issued 10.99 9.6 Surface 82406 2 Marsh Island 6/7/2012 7/10/2012 6/15/2022 Issued 8.57 4 1 12.52 27.2 8.52 31.3 1.47 0.0393 23.820 46 82406 2 Marsh Island 6/7/2012 7/10/2012 6/15/2022 Issued 8.57 8.52 Surface 2373 16 Environmental Learning Center 35.0 7/30/2001 0.0153 10.65 141 2.76 2 2.76, 51 4.6 9.0 0.60 0.0076 5.251 139 N/A 9.85 Season's at Orchid 35.0 1.00 0.0094 6.56 143 N/A 12.79 3603 12.79 35.5 1.00 0.0350 24.332 15 N/A 36.2 Orchid Cove (fka Miwhel Creek) 35.0 1.00 0.0347 24.11 144 2351 4 8.70 26.43 8.7 32.9 1.00 0.0238 16.553 148 N/A 126 Lewis Jungle Trail & 510 57.9 0.98 0.1964 136,42 16 - 2351 4 3.64 10.4 3.64 35.0 1.00 0.0100 6.925 155 CR 510 South to IRCDUS Southern Limit of Service - IRCDUS TOTAL 51.509 Na,, 0.141 MGt11 Permit No Sequence No Project Name Received Date Issue Date Expiration Date Permit Status SJRWMD Project Acreage Cur Year Water Alloc.(MGY) (,SourceNs1, \ Allbcatlon \All Total tion MGV Total Development Area Irrigation Area Irrigation% Flow MGV/Acre MGD GPM Junction Node a 4459 3 Disney's Vero Beach Resort 5/23/2002 6/28/2002 6/28/2022 Issued 8 1.4 Sur dce"j 7 22 8 36.4 0.88 00192 1332 17 4459 3 Disney's Vero Beach Resort 5/23/2002 6/28/2002 6/28/2022 Issued 8 5.6 r ,„, f N/A 71.2 Disney West 53.7 0.71 00748 51.96 156 ,rN 1 9.10 26 9.10 35.0 1.00 0.0249 17.31 140 N/A 2 Coralstone 7/5/2017 7/20/2017 5/22/2022 Issued 28 xi y1 1 t `i, 5,60 16 5.60 35.0 1.00 0.0153 10.65 141 N/A 2 North Shore Club 7/5/2017 7/20/2017 5/22/2022 Issued 28 \ ,� Surface 3,45 9.85 3.45 35.0 1.00 0.0094 6.56 143 N/A Bermuda Club _ \ 3 & 5 12.67 36.2 12.67 35.0 1.00 0.0347 24.11 144 2351 4 Sea Oaks 1/28/2013 2/28/2013 2/18/2023 Issued ,f, 71 25.9 Surface 71.7 126 73 57.9 0.98 0.1964 136,42 16 - 2351 4 Sea Oaks 1/28/2013 2/28/2013 2/18/2023 Issued / of i `Na,\ ` \ N45 8 N/A Grand Harbor Club \ \ ! 1.61 4.6 1.61 35.0 1.00 0.0044 3.06 146 67589 2 Island Club 10/29/2003 10/29/2003 10/29/2003 2/6/2021 Issued ` , 4§q 9.09 45.47 97.1 45.4 46.8 1.00 0.1246 66.51 13 67589 2 Island Club 10/29/2003 2/6/2021 Issued 85.4 ►,j 36.38 Surface 2238 2 Baytree Condo 11/12/1998 12/30/1998 12/30/2018 Issued 9.7 f 9 9 28.6 9.7 33.9 0.93 0.0247 17.12 9 John's Wand & COV8 TOTAL 165.5975 0.454 MGD IRCDUS: 1.964 MGD Permit No Sequence No Project Name Received Date Issue Date Expiration Date Permit Status SJRWMD Project Acreage Cur Year Water Alloc.(MGY) Allocation Sources Total Allocation MIT Total Development Area Irrigation Area Irrigation% Flow MGY/Ave MGD GPM Junction Node John's Island 365.00 1.0000 694.44 38 130735 1 The Shores 6/7/2012 7/9/2012 7/5/2032 Issued 38.2 10.74 27.31 71.2 38.20 53.7 0.71 00748 51.96 156 130735 1 The Shores 6/7/2012 7/9/2012 7/5/2032 Issued 38.2 16.57 Surface 70018 2 Carlton River Club 7/5/2017 7/20/2017 5/22/2022 Issued 28 9.8 28.5 135 28.39 20.9 1.01 0.0781 54.22 157 70018 2 Carlton River Club - 7/5/2017 7/20/2017 5/22/2022 Issued 28 18.7 Surface N/A - POTENTIAL CMS ALLOCATION 44676 1.2240 85000 3 & 5 Notes & Leg nd: - ASSUMED 35% GROSS AREA IRRIGATED - ASSUMED 1.0 MGY/ACRE = ASSUMED 1.0 MGY/AC • IRRIGATION AREA TOTAL 867,57 2.377 MGD - ASSUMED IRRIGATION AREA (SEASONS). PERVIOUS AREA (5E6 ATTACHED SITE PLAN BY KHA) • 70% -ASSUMED IRRIGATION AREA (ORCHID COVE - SEE "MICHAEL CREEK" SITE PLAN BV SBS) _ (LOTS' 40%)+ RECREATION / LANDSCAPE / - POTENTIAL COVE ALLOCATION -1.0 MGD ALLOCATION FOR JOHN'S ISLAND 41 IRCDUS +COVE+JI: 4.340 MGD PLOT DATE' 4/9/2019 1 1:45'20 AM 1221RCDU5 AIA RE -USE MAIN CDDIPRODUCTION DRAWINGSIEXH 0 ra �I 61 GRAPHIC SCALE 0 1000 1500 2000 Isse (IN FEET I l inch= 1000 ft. J-143 NORTH SHORE CLUB 00094 Max 8189 P9 IRCDUS UTILITY SERVICE AREA COVB UTIUTY SERVICE AREA J-9 DAYTIME CONDOS 00247 uctx 80.31 P9 .-146 GRAND HARBOR CLUB 00044 *495 8274 P9 3-18 SEA OAKS 01984 MGD; 8194 P9 PROPOSED_ 10 110 TANIT J-17 09NEY5 VERO BEACH RESORT 0.0192 MOD; 8168 P9 -1,to ilia0.1894 MID: 77.79 PSL MI WI MI ■ ,, , ii PROP � MI OZil •� ri Elm i. j ;Ana I■fldii■ mai ■ UM SII a Il ■■■r/11111111: II ,aa, iron UMW/ I in in in T 1 �I111. 11►:D • • .illlt► 4OU1►/fir- �•� 40 -3 PO7E 019 4019 ALLOCATION 01944 74.81P9 J-38 JOKY 1.0000 utD 74.4444 PSL P9 J-458, ME 00748 1101274.43 P9 iljg tAILUZI J-14, CORAISTONF 00153 MCD•. 83.419 PSL, J-22 ORO/0 ISLAND Q7074 MOD: 17.12 PSL .1-24 11aSOR 086814 111111u■I■1IIN (111111111111111 -� 11111111 11■1IC " 21111111111: �4 Ir------ ---- LIMITING FACTOR In �no M 25.0 P91 AT WINDSOR1 �11„S 0ID dtnnnc 11 00350 *495 47.82 P9 •8111111111111111 1111 8� 11!1118 J-150 OW ORCHID GROVE 00704 INA 47.91 P9 J-155 1001JUNGLE 00 9400 48.800 P9 RE -USE VOLUME SUMMARY / IRCDUS SERVICE AREA ).4636 MGD JOHN'S ISLAND /1.0000MGD POTENTIAL COVB SERSICE AREA / 0.5417 MGD TOTAL RE -USE VOLUME 3.5053 MGD WASH ISLAND 00343 Ma$ 5103 PSL J-139 ENNRCWIE/(TAL LEARNING @1199 00071 MOk 57.50 P9 LEGEND • SERVICE NODES - EXISTING SERVICE - FUTURE SERVICE EXIST. FEED FROM HOBART TANK ---- PROP. FEED FROM HOBART TANK EXIST. FEED FROM SEA OAKS VVNTP ---- PROP. FEED FROM SEA OAKS WIMP U J J 0 0 0 0 Ats W W LU -J -J 2 0 V) AIA REUSE MAIN EX -11 192 18-122 IRCDUS ALA Re -Use Main Analysis - APPLICABLE FOR SYSTEMS 13-2 & D-3 CR 110 North to Windsor- IRCDUS Permit No Sequence No Project Name Received Date Issue Date Expiration Date Permit Status SJRWMD Project Acreage Cur Year Water Alloc.(MGY) Allocation Sources Total Allocation MGY Total Development Area Irrigation Area Irrigation % Flow MGY/Acre MCI GPM Junction Node Jr 270 4 Windsor 9/3/2013 10/11/2013 4/13/2019 Issued 230.78 985 '-:> 241.4 416 142.9 34.4 1.69 0.6614 459.285 24 270 4 Windsor 9/3/2013 10/11/2013 4/13/2019 Issued 230.78 142.9 Surface 260 9 Orchid island 2/20/2013 3/20/2013 3/7/2020 Issued 278.2 100.4 1 258.2 436 278 63.8 0.93 0.7074 491.248 22 260 9 Orchid Island 2/20/2013 3/20/2013 3/7/2020 Issued 278.2 157.8 Surface CR 510 East to West- IRCDUS TOTAL 499.6 1.369 MGD Permit No Sequence No Project Name Received Date Issue Date Expiration Date Permit Status SJRWMD Project Acreage Cur Year Water Alloc.(MGY( Allocation Sources Total Allocation MGY Total Development Area Irrigation Area Irrigation 96 Flow MGY/Acre MGD GPM Junction Nodel 10001 4 Old Orchid Grove 10/25/2001 5/20/2002 5/20/2022 Issued 10.99 1.5 '-:> 11.1 39.17 10.99 28.1 1.01 0.0304 21.119 150 10001 4 Old Orchid Grove 10/25/2001 5/20/2002 5/20/2022 Issued 10.99 9.6 Surface 82406 2 Marsh Island 6/7/2012 7/10/2012 6/15/2022 Issued 8.57 4 1 12.52 27.2 8.52 31.3 1.47 0.0343 23.820 ' 46 82406 2 Marsh Island 6/7/2012 7/10/2012 6/15/2022 Issued 857 8.52 Surface 2373 5.60 Environmental Learning Center 5.60 7/30/2001 1.00 0.0153 10.65 2.76 N/A 2.7649 51 4.6 9.0 0.60 0.0076 5.251 139 N/A 3.45 Season's at Orchid 3.45 35.0 1.00 0.0094 6.56 143 N/A 12.79 36.03 12.79 35.5 1.00 0.0350 24.332 15 N/A 12.67 Orchid Cove (fka Micahel Creek) 12.67 35.0 1.00 00347 24.11- 144 2351 8,70 26.43 8.7 32.9 1.00 0.0238 16.553 148 N/A 71.7 Lewis Jungle Trail & 510 73 579 0.98 01964 736.42 16 2351 3.64 10.4 3.64 35.0 1.00 0.0100 6.925 155 CR 510 South to IRCDUS Southern Unlit of Service - IRCDUS TOTAL 1 51109 0.143 MGD. Permit No Sequence No Project Name Received Date Issue Date Expiration Date Permit Status SJRWMD Protect Acreage Cur Year Water ` Alloc.(MGY) \SUWCes Allocation Total Allbc tion MG) Total Development Area Irrigation Area Irrigation 96 Flow MGY/Acte MGD GPM Junction Nodel 4459 3 Disney's Vero Beach Resort 5/23/2002 6/28/2002 6/28/2022 Issued 8 1.45urface"` '-:> 365.00 22 g 36.4 0.88 0.0392 13.32 17 4459 3 Disney's Vero Beach Resort 5/23/2002 6/26/2002 6/28/2022 Issued 6 _ 5.6, ; 8 1 0 GRAPHIC SCALE 0 1000 1500 2000 (IN FEET 1 inch = 1000 ft. NOM3-143 SHORE CELS 0.0004 10247272 P9 IRCDUS UTILITY SERVICE AREA COVB UTIUTY SERVICE AREA 000 c7 " c .1 3 COMB AILOCARIN 0.1044 M06 3485 P9 J-0 BAYIRE 4 CONDOS 0.0247 Nal; 40.08 P9 J-144 GRAM HARBOR a.UB 0.0044 AMR 42.52 P9 J-16 SEA OAKS 0.1064 NGD: 44.23 P9 J- 3 ISLAM CLUB 0.1248 WO 41.43 P9 ■.I ■■ mess No adillagni Pouritimm 4\iriiii ErOppimmui i•t I MI NI J-5 CONN ALOG90N 0.1944 1101:K 3756 P9 3-36 YAMS ISLAND 1.0000 NOD: 34.22 P9, J-17 DISNEY'S 1010 8EAO1 RESORT 0.0192 1101:k 4510 P9 a E165T �il�dab Al l�0%Op o% %r Ifs �: � il. /i.CC .: 1::: rrl i C: ,i 'ce 1111111111111111111111 %u11■ LIIIIIIIIIIIIIu 3 22 111•En iii ii .....211111111111atom fSLAND 11 raw I.1.88._.. = — a7074 1DO 17-04 P9 ZIMITINO FACTOR ..P'"'S.D PSI AT VNNOSOR r 2 I • a 4881 1K2k 14:4:_I 011.10011 1 111u01ghufumiaow* 111111111111 d-1 11E 94ORES 0.0746 11910 34.18 P9 3-141 CORASTOIE 00153 AND: 44.72 P9 J-1501 01D ata60 (ROPE 58304 1822; 47.91 P9 SEA5 SONS O ORCHID 0.0350 I4118 47.92 P9 3-166 00AIME P9 RE -USE VbLUME SUMMARY IRCDUS SERVICE AREA 4636 MGD JOHN'S ISLAND 2..0000 MGD POTENTIAL COVB SERVICE AREA / 0.5417 MGD TOTAL RE -USE VOLUME 7 3.5053 MGD J-44 1lAR91 ISLAND 0.031.7 MOk 5503 P9 4-139 0NNRONIENTAL LEARINO maim a0070 NM 57.50 P9 LEGEND - • SERVICE NODES — EXISTING SERVICE — FUTURE SERVICE EXIST. FEED FROM HOBART TANK --- PROP. FEED FROM HOBART TANK J J 0 0 0 0 w 00 J 2 0 lV N w AIA REUSE MAIN EX -12 194 18-122 IRCDUS AIA Re -Use Main Analysis - APPLICABLE FOR SYSTEMS D-2 & 0-3 CR 510 North to Windsor- IRCDUS Permit No Sequence No Project Name Received Date Issue Date Expiration Date Permit Status SJRWMD Project Acreage Cur Year Water Alloc.(MGY) Allocation Sources Total Allocation MGY Total Development Area Irrigation Area Irrigation% Flow MGY/Acre MGD GPM Junction Node 270 4 Windsor 9/3/2013 10/11/2013 4/13/2019 Issued 230.78 98.5 Surfacellaites 243.4 416 142.9 34.4 1.69 0.6614 459285 24 270 4 Windsor 9/3/2013 10/11/2013 4/13/2019 Issued 230.78 142.9 Surface 260 9 Orchid Island 2/20/2013 3/20/2013 3/7/2020 Issued 278.2 100.4 1 258.2 436 278 63.8 0.93 0.7074 491.248 22 260 9 Orchid Island 2/20/2013 3/20/2013 3/7/2020 Issued 278.2 157.8 Surface CR 510 Fast to West • IRCDUS TOTAL 499.6 1.369 MGD Permit No Sequence No Project Name Received Date Issue Date Expiration Date Permit Status SJRWMD Project Acreage Cur Year Water Alloc.(MGY) Allocation Sources Total Allocation MGY Total Development Area Irrigation Area Irrigation % Flow MGY/Acre MGD GPM Junction Nodea 10001 4 Did Orchid Grove 10/28/2001 5/20/2002 5/20/2022 Issued 10.99 13 Surfacellaites 11.1 39.17 10.99 281 1.01 0.0304 21.139 150 10001 4 Old Orchid Grove 10/25/2001 5/20/2002 5/20/2022 Issued 10,99 9.6 Surface 82406 2 Marsh Island 6/7/2012 7/10/2012 6/15/2022 Issued 8.57 4 1 1252 27.2 8.52 313 1.47 0.0343 23.820 46 82406 2 Marsh Island 6/7/2012 7/10/2012 6/15/2022 Issued 8.57 8.52 Surface 2373 5.60 Environmental Learning Center 5.60 7/30/2001 1.00 0.0153 10.65 2.76 N/A 2.76,A, 51 4.6 90 0.60 0.0076 5.251 139 N/A 3.45 Season's at Orchid 3.45 35.0' 1.00 0.0094 6.56 143 N/A 12.79 36,03 12.79 35.5 1.00 0.0350 24.332 15 N/A . 12.67 Orchid Cove (fka Micelle' Creek) 12.67 35.0 1.00 0.0347 24.11 144 2351 8.70 26.43 8.7 32.9 1.00 0.0238 16.553 148 N/A 71.7 Lewis Jungle Trail & 510 73 57.9 0.98 0.1964 136.42 16 2351 3.64 - 10.4 3.64 35.0 1.00 0.0100 6.925 155 CR 510 South to IRCDUS Southern Limit of Service - IRCDUS TOTpE 6 5111:1 0.141 MGD, Permit No Sequence No Project Name Received Date Issue Date Expiration Date Permit Status SJRWMD Project Acreage Cur Year Water Alloc.(MGY) gr Allocation Sources Total rilatIon MGY Total Development Area Irrigation Area Irrlgatlon% Flow MGY/Acre MGD GPM Junction Node 4459 3 Disney's Vero Beach Resort 5/23/2002 6/28/2002 6/28/2022 Issued 8 1.4 Surfacellaites `. 365.00,E 22 8 36.4 0.88 0.0192 1332 17 4459 3 Disney's Vero Beach Resort 5/23/2002 6/28/2002 6/28/2022 Issued 8 _ 5.6 2731 N/A 38.20 Disney West 0.73 0.0748 5196 156 130735 1 9.10 26 9.10 350 1.00 0.0249 17.31 140 N/A Carlton River Club Coralstone 7/20/2017 5/22/2022 Issued 28 9.6 28.5 5.60 16 5.60 35.0 1.00 0.0153 10.65 141 N/A Carlton River Club North Shore Club 7/20/2017 5/22/2022 Issued 28 18.7 AMRIleus N/A 3.45 9.85 3.45 35.0' 1.00 0.0094 6.56 143 N/A 141.91' Bermuda Club 0.3888 _ _ `+� . 12.67 36.2 12.67 35.0 1.00 0.0347 24.11 144 2351 4 Sea Oaks 1/28/2013 2/28/2013 2/18/2023 Issued 461371 Wk. N,W25.9 Surface 71.7 126 73 57.9 0.98 0.1964 136.42 16 2351 4 Sea Oaks 1/28/2013 2/28/2013 2/18/2023 Issued 71 •5A N/A Grand Harbor Club 1.61 4.6 1.61 35.0 1.00 0.0044 3.06 146 67589 2 Island Club 10/29/2003 10/29/2003 2/6/2021 Issued 45)4 909 45,47 97.1 45.4 46.8 1.00 0.1246 86.51 13 67589 2 Island Club 10/29/2003 10/29/2003 2/6/2021 Issued 54 i,,/9a✓ 36.38 Surface 2238 2 Baytree Condo 11/12/1998 12/30/1998 12/30/2018 Issued 9.7 9 9 28.6 9.7 33.9 0.93 0.0247 17.12 9 John's Island & COVB TOTAL 165.5975 0.454 MGD IRCDUS: 1.964 MGD Permit No Sequence Na Protect Name Received Date Issue Date Expiration Date Permit Status SJRWMD Project Acreage Cur Year Water Alloc.(MGY) Allaca9on Sources Total Allocation MGY Total Development Area Irrigation Area Irrlgatlon% Flow MGY/Acre MGD GPM Junction Node ».L-8 = iso ';..--.'t _"- John's island, ., .,, ,:-." ,,"- -"^-.r';.. -, .r •r. s --^r> 3�t-)Jr>--, .<..,.r .. .. _, a., __ -, `. 365.00,E 130735 1 The Shores 6/7/2012 7/9/2012 7/5/2032 Issued 38.2 10.74 2731 71.2 38.20 53.7 0.73 0.0748 5196 156 130735 1 The Shores 6/7/2012 7/9/2012 7/5/2032 Issued 38,2 16.57 Surface 70018 2 Carlton River Club 7/5/2017 7/20/2017 5/22/2022 Issued 28 9.6 28.5 135 28,19 20.9 1.01 0.0781 54.22 157 70018 2 Carlton River Club 7/5/2017 7/20/2017 5/22/2022 Issued 28 18.7 Surface N/A POTENTIAL COVB ALLOCATION- --- .-- - -- - '- 141.91' 0.3888 270.00 3&5 Notes & Le end: - ASSUMED 35%69015 4REA IRRIGATED - ASSUMED 1.0 MGY/ACRE = ASSUMED 1.0 MGY/AC IRRIGATION AREA TOTAL 562.72 1.542 MGD - ASSUMED IRRIGATION AREA (SEASONS). PERVIOUS AREA (SEE ATTACHED SITE PLAN BY MA)* 70% - ASSUMED IRRIGATION AREA (OR0117 COVE -SEE "MICHAEL CREEK" SITE PLAN BY 565 ) _ (LOTS .4090* RECREATION / LANDSCAPE / - POTENTIAL COVE ALLOCATION - 1.0 MGD ALLOCATION FOR JOHN'S ISLAND 45 IRCDUS+COVB+JI: 3.505 MGD PLANS FOR NORTH COUNTY RE -USE WATER MAIN STUDY AIA FROM C.R. 510 TO OLD WINTER BEACH ROAD, INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA a F vi 8.1 beiow g C+8 'ft. START OF PROJECT DEVELOPMENTS • DISNEY VACATION CLUB AT VERO BEACH DEVELOPMENTS -CORALSTONE • NORTH SHORE CLUB -BERMUDA CLUB -SEA OAKS EAST - SEA OAKS WEST DEVELOPMENTS • FLORIDA CONSERVATION AND RECREATIONAL LANDS • GRAND HARBOR BEACH CLUB - BAYTREE VILLAS - BAYTREE OCEAN VILLAS DEVELOPMENTS • BAYTREE VILLAS • BAYTREE OCEAN VILLAS -MARBRISA SEASIDE VILLAGE MARBRISA •SEA COLONY - INDIAN TRAILS • AVALON SUBDIVISION -OCEAN PEARL EAST -OCEAN PEARL WEST DEVELOPMENTS - OCEAN PEARL EAST -OCEAN PEARL WEST - VERO BEACH ESTATES EAST - VERO BEACH ESTATES WEST • PALM LSLAND PLANTATION -CARLTON VERO BEACH SUB. DEVELOPMENTS - PALM ISLAND PLANTATION -CARLTON VERO BEACH SUB. • PALM ISLAND PLANTATION CABANAS -.IOHMS ISLAND - RIVER CLUB CONDOS -GRAND HAVEN 9 • L X71 END OF PROJECT mi., fill LOCATION MAP SCHULKE, BITTLE & STODDARD, L.L.C. CIVIL & STRUCTURAL ENGINEER/NG •LAND PLANNING. ENVIRONMENTAL PERMITTING CERTIFICATION OF AUTHORIZATION NO.: 00008688 1717 INDIAN RIVER BLVD., SUITE 201 VERO BEACH, FLORIDA 32960 TEL 772 / 770-9622 FAX 772 / 770-9496 EMAIL info@sbsengineers.com Sheet List Table Sheol Sheet Title Number C-000 COVER 1 FROM STATION 433+14.3 (C.R. 510) 70 417+84.6 1A FROM STATION 433+14.3 (C.R. 510) 70 417+84.6 ID MOT -HOLING' SECTIONS 2 FROM STATION 417+84.6 TO 390+88.3 2A FROM STATION 417+84.6 TO 390+88.3 213 MOT -HOLING` SECTIONS 3 FROM STATION 390+88.3 TO 364+19.8 3A FROM STATION 390+88.3 TO 364+19.8 38 `POT -HOLING` SECTIONS 4 FROM STATION 364+19.8 TO 337+52.7 4A FROM STATION 364+19.8 TO 337+52.7 48 "POT -HOLING" SECTIONS 5 FROM STATION 337+52.7 TO 320+41.3 5A FROM STATION 337+52.7 TO 320+41.3 58 `POT-HOUNG• SECTIONS 6 FROM STATION 320+41.3 TO 306+27.7 (OLD WINTER BEACH ROAD) 6A FROM STATION 320+41.3 TO 306+27.7 (OLD WINTER BEACH ROAD) 68 `POT•HOLING" SECTIONS 7 SEA OAKS 3M TANK WASTE WATER TREATMENT PLANT 7A SEA OAKS 3M TANK WASTE WATER TREATMENT PLANT 8 SOIL BORING REPORTS J OLE sowtelturnvrArpN CALE 196 'y M Ma i :M'N arcs (..„-r mai Pal aaw NOTE: DISNEY HAS EXISTING RE -USE CONNECTION r cw.lasl AIA ..._........ wr�f'' ^r rNM/Ea arcs PL., iEsal ...Os 4, ono °,1 17.w�l • .®�I mr.MP 121AN, t _ - STATE w.P.OAD A_1•A _ — _ _ - --+-:y 704 .-4:Z. ra"— _.~r.3rAw 3/rrh moi— _ '� .�w.n.rr <.•a. _ � — .p—> —1_ _ a..�. � — _ --ese•lefres..M.a2usavanseamaemeemas "g"'" dl ds dT sr pP wNlurcl — w,.4 .... Fs,. way I — Cdp`at[I��C' _ 'm1C_�"—•si.,, �...— — Oji--�°f Z�..+�, — u[ • —r - a f MC I C NOTE: DISNEY HAS EXISTING RE -USE CONNECTION 1 r roc NTOM r MwmWq SYNBOLIEGENO 0,14.0.11.0 WHIM wsnia swoon ma.eG eft .141.11CIBTA NORTH GRAPHIC SCALE r t Y T t 1 NOTE: DISNEY HAS EXISTING RE -USE CONNECTION NOTE: DISNEY HAS EXISTING REUSE CONNECTION r wNWa n— — (antler) INC w to--t.M apace — rMw•Wq �p1Y 'rM w IRQ rMu1AC NORTH SNORE CLUE SUS ACRES 7 LOTS r varlet% 111.041111 7/P Ir arc wMIRCX "O 2 I I i STATE ROAD A- I -A - __ — II'fl__- o'77-Irr _-moo-0au ` I I nu T I1 2,5--iiegas-F6_ a.d/�--pw--rw .• ve_aIt---� er .✓ -, _ IThtl,c R'It —aa.maA ZrMW6Rq of •Ji J I[ B dT _ T . / 1=1,!_s__;.....,—,:.:::_i_.d r. „,. 4, . _ - -'"- - - 1 1 Wir +"fyiil i"7"11 TA' r' P_______4-40,,,,,-: 1sa. dT w wR mei r INV WY WI 'gyp aKl L/P p N.st)�ivr O,a.ftlmw•I NOTE: DISNEY HAS EXISTING REUSE CONNECTION j �e 0 - 9 I p •y�SNEY VACATION SLUR AT VERO SEALI�.� n o-a•u� 331ST ACRES -L TOO UNITS ,f� • •Aw,r.'PYC PH Nal to NOTE: DISNEY HAS EXISTING RE -USE CONNECTION CORALSTONE :1523 ACRES .. INC fid �, • a / Ir -Y2'2` G, •u fi '` J• rSNEY VACATION 4AC AT VERO SEI101 , :+A+A ACRES t j+ f;A r PVC SSW) PVC • 1-: se • 1; I• :MwKRW % PVC"".+w — % nmel «tV�� Of 1P4 r PVC 1 Of W NOTE:—\r..cwr.nws, DISNEY HAS EXISTING 4,0•00010c1 RE -USE CONNECTION I —P �_— W_ w o.w.mui i d7 � An an-'i'CfrmRwrviR w cn em� SI T[POADA_1-A-r.'._-- -.---- - i [ 0.000 • �. - ae .A4R_ ae = - ' •— = =tea = PW-- IXr i• ABBREVIATIONS: IVCT .C�nITICa w.� DsnEY VACATION CLUB AT VERO MAC 232.67 ACRES • *NOWT, SYMBOL 1ECEN0 NOTE: DISNEY HAS EXISTING RE -USE CONNECTION EgtLOOP.O.t. WO .Pe,., -) ....., ,... ,11.+0i, c,P... m.WAN,..aw,.ru. I w I ' •0.11N, NORTH GRAPHIC EC -ALE t r , 1/. NOTE: ,3 DISNEY HAS EXISTING RE -USE CONNECTION, f �-' REUSE NOTE :H AS'EECj s,STINO i`.�, +p_ rw.c samc CONNECTION G IRei _ r« 1N+— — _ QPR� \ P �rW �.'� u�' ' �f'"---7.------,:, mac. p lit' r..nRel �rR��,_ �_ .__ . HAa STATE ROAD A - I -A--1a - — _ - -1 i - I "-r— -..cr :'.Nrr - - -."11 I cn to v xwr _ _gi�pp _ ' l@ _ _ 4 r Y � ,64.gJ--- _ OC x.. _ - - alL r r ''''"": �,' x''.7 roc '- — —dire --_°gin -rvemRa - • 1111111.' 7r6 11111111111 - NOTE: DISNEY HAS EXISTING REUSE CONNECTION SNE? VACATION CLUB AT VENO [EAC x 3237 ACRES. x 200 UNITS y en.c0,410.) / wx3Aq RTH5 •R CLUB x S.$S ACRES 'LOTS NOTE: DISNEY HAS EXISTING REUSE CONNECTION ...11f12,12l O.. MAO.. 1/...<111N. f OnvoyOffan. Ilmdf0.0-16.1..rOUOISSO101,41,,,, fOrinO VOODOO4JutoCADIff AIA RE -USE MAIN INDIAN RIVER COUNTY UTIUTIES DEPARTMENT "POT—HOUNG" SECTIONS SCHULKE, BITTLE & STODDARD, L.L.C. e .571WITAIl ENCIVERMG • lAVO FtWIC • DIVROWEIML MIMING Cflf•ICAOLN Of fif110612004 11•3-t =OMB 177 INDIAN RIVER BLVD, SUTE 201 VERO BEACH, FLORIDA 32960 TEL 772 r 7700922 FAX 772 / 7700406 EMIL4100SS.no/n..nco,,, -Gcc wN nan DISNEY VACATION / CLUB AT VERO BEACH *13.14 ACRESI NORTH SHORE CLUB 5995 ACRES TLOT5 C) PVC CT/1- a — Iwc) O -..�cR�.1N�RN•-� „es. 46� - rOvctN)wq fr .W33N3 O novae q snarcw✓ 1 •ad r o• n+>.z 3x a -- -RipA.i+�El' MRCL�r�a•\B+ a -IN+' �� da • dat— I da 0/2 'da da 101 0 AM r 7,13 40 d INC EFC O3c) E/P • �a EFF3Rc) qr^ rno4EFM)wq-T 3803gI STATE ROTO A- I -A -..-mo -ornr >Toaar__—.nc--G E/7 3/P : --3. EFe 030) REMCRIEW o. 1� 0033 dT 0.0 w+/ MUD 4—__ 177=.3,- _ .0- �B AM. RE µ� MC)A r evc w4ORcl ' - - — ' _rrowMlwagr ▪ - -_ �E-,oeE wM t" 393 RAMO ...�- q f- -71 . ,rIRR) NORTH SHORE CLUB 36.85 ACRES 7 LOTS revC fill I8C) CORALSTONE 31593 ACRES B 3 e�"Aer, '0.1./C aft) • r P70 WN OEC) wR MCI ..r - 4x37 bA6s 66900 1174,U1-.-..Enterk vrq.AAiti[crVfA9l Ery r, E/P E/P F/P 'ev EJP E/P 1r amp OB (RC) 070F)F0I (PRP) , yew PI r EFF (wc) •r 30 \) h"' 70Mairoma 30 PVC V/141.C) - • t9 ANC1 _..:,� E/P E/P •'"/ •°"v 6 STATE ROAD A- N"X•".Vir” ll A l ---1--- �Mw----�---�j—,�..,-- uro.sswia—cr •�, 770 nRcr 770 oe gniit evcwN63c) A�.yty. RF da pl. N3 DIY IY -r •en,� 6U 4V• U5l rteR)C NJ 805,3 4250E 44 =211011.1"233..-1411.---CY RE r -_ -113110$ IDI, rI vVt v< •+ 3737 Fselw SEA OAKS EAS * 22.97 ACRES IA1 1 BERMUDA CLUE 5$3.16 ACRES 63 UNITS I � I,r e70wN Mcl E/n�� Jr F/e 'x. 7 HAd ars Lamp. OGLiE Nov FIELOI r PVC MIMI > �PvC CRC) "•_`713'7 nr R — — E1 737? 3/9 ow [RLOCATE v. E/P oninc a''mons, paer -or —mss—FS 11, REPO I 401 Ar,v A. y r I&))wc) EA' IeTAlt T ua =R W - pbp on) 137./ ft(' PVC ESe OF- e1 `•faY , ' `� �Ss� - CILMECHO la t�r r PVC N (PIC) 5' 121 rI lA) SYMBOL LEGEND Ef.6,14,4111-411.6EVell t551 MI. OM COMO PONCAINE reran, EXIS11.1410.041611,0•17 WE Awa~' ,r' P70 WN P • Form • lar46•4)86 r rr9v4.45- 14J MM. SLEEVE tZMOOLI ./ IYw0PO BERMUDA CLUB 3 38.16 ACRES 93 UNITS OAKS EAS 52297ACRE5 1 ✓ 433"3, vs.. 4 {r Li "' .r m 34403 .✓ .✓ ,07000x)80) u .r. ®.. a . - -.—r-.-..m-11.•24," r �NN202030) oa . 1NA (COULD NO f '__- E/0 p STATF,fr,OAD A -I -A _ HELD) w rMR(IMI 1 b, - � PEQfNryit)-6 — ,.,t. - - —F— - - —,f-;" — - - — - - 77.....t._.:,....., - .r y aAn uuSTi1 B 0) -- -. MO.) x'f RBAI ,tv • SEA OAKS EAS1� 1222.37 ACRES SEA OAKS WEST f 93.65 ACRES Y 190 UNITS . -.�_TF _••�_-R -..1N- MOM) LocAllvi RBA) �yN w MVO RAW v r evc 9FP0901 // ex pRel •• r d da dl / 37 d3 JK•e >2: 4 703 &E-.0 EL/ C.7 dm"' ..-. ew ____..-- .. `t✓ RfKN. POLL ▪ DISMOCKIVII D - OR<E Io,.v.4 w,00.0..0.110. 2...J e«IE r mpg ABBREVIATIONS FM OM) SEA OAKS WEST 293.93 ACRES WO UNITS 1.. ssw 92. rTN • — .....7--__-E, w u Rt - - J.-. l2.11E;C 3 — 3•<n+. v a' AM I 37070 ESP WI:_�..• i0;.�: a/ d3 da ,r703(8 —7 NORTH GRAPHIC SCALE T 1• T T ,1019@)• IT 00 SEA OAKS ViE5T S 93.63 ACRES 3190 UNITS L 1 8 1 ti D 00160' -IN \ I I 37 PVC RAMC) e WRay 200 2 `ie=`1344 I � NORTH SHORE nc�w 3 rf.0 SS WI 2- 0 pISNEY VACATION 11 r CLUE AT VEIIO BREACH `' 2SAS ACRES „A/�<2.� r - _ +•! ^t•ne wNPt, N! 1Lon '4, -. 21AttACRES:; VI LiWr ____ al �,. y �I t_l ,,(�� ^racer a r - - a W - -.-.- a - - - a'r, •.-. s1M , eT)-3�r -• .7,RR . �S'_ _. e.1. 1...... ai ,l=-...-41 Ne --.8I �-.r0.............4a-..WS-.�ir++,/P...w+�/F.�c� r• ..., PC) 18 Rove Coal 1.! Lr - STATE ROgD A-1 •A r 742E77SM rr0WPt) VP --•• .CYT C/7 W e/T' CUL HA8 Ara V- 1 NORTH SHORE CLUB ISA ACRES. r 782.1.8.1 111 e-ar - A ASIS rr.YC NN(MC/ ■ - rM -N4.- - 274212c00•43 ou 881 v A 1 NciNWCI se ® •9 .Jil}7�'�rT : , 0 — Q aM�'IM1— -i__L icer 17 initIA �'° tr70O3r WOv l 1 u1CWINAGISPITT Maria. .0 Tr, •J role(22 w NORTH SNORE CLUB 2183 ACRES T LOTS SI_ r Ric 71 .82) CCRALSTONE 216.3 ACRES .C'ffw pAc,-- Ir NniA 08• 4.801 13ER21 LUB 232.13 ORES QQ lit• . ▪ a�E Cwt SCM* PMS {Mea r..wE ..1E vvE ANjE 12-2.222 ASCE a+.mr-1* w 'J111_ =iAH-, S�AWACI EP e/T e/ EA - 41 r.•2vac P*, uupnc, MCI e,f • STATE ROAD A- It RoR °E— E Pc, ____—._—_y—______(_____—_ --A- 'a" ,700 cl • 8247" ---aa fki r TR (215/ IS M2MIMC1 //' .4 ukCrcl °utEw -�1� �g —t— 4_•=l- 1 rrwctnaRE) iyN '.•s:aLYir�M�. Mb. 1^' —* °/'a ME 820,37 7 "4 RIC) Ec�RN, ——a 3C .-- S(RT Va -k; y -3_a -H I� -ice .-�- - r wcfElM 1 PIP SYMBOL LEGEND 411.111.01.9.11410. 61:1114 KwinuatORML1101.1. r. 17 8844 (N ERS. OAC B 2 80.10 ACRES 3Nan M�E11 OAKS EAST T/ ACRis 1 ---■ --33 - S UM OM LRol LOCATE m.'atuw.rW�•• n 7- rvC roc ORO TS PEA OAKS EAST] 2 2S87 ACRES - X40: • °carer - RV 0, lrrcEif Q "-1fia'. IT PVC wMNlq ,A•rora4.d 1 Yui. EP E/1 ti STATUOAD A t A — Roar° ✓- , aw-.-..-a S4 taFf MRI 18701.11 �OAKSEA3 SEA OARS WEST' 23.20 ACRES 2180 U/ATS -IT o --�- T/> ',nom Ste r RTC) N3 4/3 d,d) 43 N) a.r—�fa.Aaa «s•,�-v1E-----aiwL awe--..r='Er—aR ---nryal�,4 • r 8221 ti ,ml va 1wM3g2 Iry ® 1111111164.:116.:01raft OLITMOGINWtt 11161.°0 E WM GaMW ,mow e>K ABBREVIATIONS: CON• MVO MOW. CI rOAKS wear 2,380 ACRES 2120 UMTS NORTH GRAPHIC SCALE t ? T T IT MR SEA OAKS WEST 2380 ACRES 2120 UNITS T 1■lel E • AM 1 INC en PCI :ohm r PVC MC) • 3 j v 2A 3,7412.2' .,,t,no.M.44,41....*A.ts,/.1vms,mr*pern46wmp* tAzAss t&44scstg tAztssag A e A & A A AzAAcgce A'4,—;scutf, L t4p4;AEAA i9 I A f,IzzA,A41-01 AIA RE -un MAIN INDIAN RIVER COUNTY UTIUTIES DEPARTMENT "POT—HOLING" SECTIONS I SCHULKE, BITTLE S, STODDARD, L.L.O. / 5116/11.204. OCNBEAB/ • WV RNAING • 41441400•404,1 IMMO OFRICATION 0 NJ 444.4041 MEL WOMB 1717 INDIAN RIVER BLVD., SUITE 201 VERO DUCK BLORIDA 321.3 2E4272 T20.9522 FAX 772 7704426 MAL viaestaanginevcoom 3YL87ACRE2I OS EAS MEN 4'111.111 l —a „to.. �T rwu(1cl FLORIDA CONSERVATION AND RECREATIONAL LANDS Y6.78 ACRES EM M EM I I� r w___ r y W V Fvc d Efilia NS �1 0106 81001-7_ All,• ..�.�!7�1�!�'��A�./.� D w1Gitl's'_�`— D' rI Q SEA OARS WEST' • r ±83.66 ACRES Y 180 UNITS SAI-c Pvc WMR EM / GRAND HARBOR BEACH CLUB Y 4.63 ACRES INC Y"meq C/1• —bq -- -n4q—.04A E/P en.WM)° STATt,ROAD A -I -A- ___� 1•01PFM IRC) FM 010 EM .3' /rtlP fA1 RC1 _ r PVC EN, 7041 EM a..—ng =tfrite-IXq..="Rfbq — r6 a O 010 — —A= 13 W PARaa�g61 Ps-.rW IT—w WI -TA— 7�—E7,{q r 3,. c g410 10141! --4 --s. ---I-- -,,e,• I ����p' Ryr 'PMRcI 1 n6 Z tlFYE�q—"'r—drMl--i[" —FdIGA RAA �d .11..64011 r OREM OKI rRP RE RCI IT PVC 8800C) • rucv rte, �a9 wl[(RC) PVC a IR.) r e•RP f / / UOCONFRL¢D WATER BFRVICE 100 RPO FOUND R RC "Ae AMLT'FILM FLORIDA CONSERVATION AND RECREATIONAL LANDS *3121 ACRES / M —�3 FLORIDA CONSERVATION AND RECREATIONAL LANDS Y10.14 ACRES Pq L =% Iz wcER it Pvc A EM •A I 0104 WMRCI PMIRCI �,T WRrocati 1 ar Wr 1TM iAPP06LEEVEswn.RUi T339308Rnl - ..,y _ _ I_ lyrwweo STATE ROAD A - i -A ,", ,",re oruW � 1FNRCI a° ue -,:FB c,,,r.�m ° .Em= aw =E�- — tl Ee. IT PVC WMIRCI .118 M---aWr—A- - --70 ,�. B Ni -i` — 8 A."— —� 3 ii AR- — — 8 A- (IT we wN O.) ER -ar " E/F FA 1°1 e"FMIR0) rk••• FN '�° —ani --bq Laq---bq--- MI 6 tr PI/CWMIRq •r-V-aWTT•h Air- + y0 AN ARF.. —BE} —13M E MMMMMM -121 PVC MIMIC) 10. RC1 L4 •44.Bsacl --aql—— M(R0) IT 101 /U 'WO 11 P FLORIDA CONSERVATION AND RECREATIONAL LANDS Y 3121 ACRES ,` ° r- FLORIDA CONSERVATION AND RECREATIONAL LANDS Y 10.14 ACRES FLORIDA CONSERVATION AND RECREATIONAL LANDS 137.21 ACRES ri -/ BAYTREE OCEAN VILLAS YNUM ACRES .NM • ANIS SAw --B EMB AIF E/P8 AR- �e 3 EM 8 AER mfr Sa _ 1 ft .•89(100) CI EM JAB @i>WF/ STATE ROAD A-1 -A - - - _ y 0190333 EM E/P `um��r+ _'E "r�r�'�-��,`ar Vii"' F -y, , i_'L�' firAr rAnI I mewr / SYMBOL LEGEND - 10.11110001TA/re SEMI - 0.1".inanfi WINCE 0.04 "Er�°""` Nw � r PYC0MR0) Cr -7W Rn wN nncl 0 0.940.00901 POWER ME IX( 000040140.010c6 Off 80811•10/ rAYTREE VILLAS *18.10 ACRES n EM HA.3 tr PVCVq IRci PRI ABBREVIATIONS' 140 • NOM RMI100111TY 4114,0120.40 T M 1M I0_---tlW— reuriar NORTH GRAPHIC SCALE t ? ? ? EM I a IAV) -Dl ri y --all AFF EM 1— CI IONA P 203 111 3 4- 9A /S--112 - iDANS FLORIDA CONSERVATOR I [ FES [,,. -'• slif]ACRES� '' RECREATIONAL LARDa:SYS ACRES — =rrwOV /• �J' -- -- _— I ti -MR— — - - — ----- 7 —� = -- a.� 3— [•:.% : _�__ r +rROwRRCI. �. - . Z— PF if r asp _ `''--- _ _ il. - _r WM�rc o• r.r ..r.. - - -•Yr agar a — — ---11r --12r ... l� 6R 1..-=..PT. _et 1 �' - FCaWRMCIV—e.--.hA-- • �>i1rRC-2101N —Rn[n --tln —cc. pt..a0•LR—ame---Gln ---i�� CRnT` �Rn [R ✓ T [R -`R y .rwwlRc� STATIC P.OAD Ai. _A ♦ '.0 i / mom ,/ _� — - - ,./..=' _ _ —1_ _ _ F -._„,,,,,N.- _ 4. _ ... - n.riyv Jrl• .,:.....!e. run IRG�� - - _ � � •••• . -y.,._ _ _.•._ _ _ ..._ - - —I- _122a -r .. - ,_}— [ IY ROFe 0e 01Y} ...4�I r PHalal r 0 wv 1 FR IReI WI 1 J .0= -L .--_f . •50 ✓2 rrvc bec 7, N [R [R .• L 17 I M T � rr OFr.RIq R �R I ca --an --Griivl l[ G n nYdc ZGLLL = �n� Rn - ---[iier. ---a70 . - w a 1 Sa�:*. 1!�� -- - - - ..... ,` er. [:'Ar .iDS Dl dR— ._ ..... . _• •• •�[ ���� _ i.. _ ikRi+Vi-- wr�iiYYr -C !._- Irk. 00 it 1 _ - Wf��•� • .0rrN01= �"f,`�rl FLORIDA CONSERVATOR AND REATI NAL LA RECREATIONAL E SFA DANSVJE `\ \ [-� �1�`�l�l,[Fl\�\1F�\w W �� E1e0 UMTS rwOV•Rua GRAND HARBOR ORS l` BEACH CLUB * 4.33 ACRES LI r5 7 -ORwN WCI r�J' r a UNCGAn[.pw.tOl MY. .� .� -.^_+Y • ....up., FLORIDA CONSERVATION RECREATIONAL LANDS I •I i OM IRO 0,0.0 MRe,s1x.Kr MIN L .. jj., ear. f� _ • 01014 ACRES __:mill IANIRMI1 M. CO t 114111r }rrl�t� =-vim-----•ro.-,Oc,uL!- _ Ni -'6� ="sc.- ar�� ar ar_--Dir'- - nI- • rvcnv rF.cw.ly rx>iP'= --aw'-- --°` _ eAw-�-e.[+a- AF.- - e •R- t •.- a A[[- M ��r cR w L TMw.V[G IN; �Ir ov I SLEee 4x.7 ia. v LIrFucwunlxl u EIF w - -AFw.ro _ STATE_ROAD A. I -A _ ~ _ _ ,� -�•rf __-'-f-_—.�J _—_y: 9-- 1 a,.,.: .�. .Awn,. tHzti -----1-_—r'✓--- 4.34*I[R ../ ---r-----y-- e. r __—I__ l"',-;-- .J 0 ..I .J ':..�-.-� �i -mn- -an- [R _ -f-on--an-- --R cn - n T.- - - --Mgda- �t8s+vn- qA-3R�Ti�[C-af..- Rawl • 'lGl1A — _ _ Ne FD11 FLORIDA CONSERVATION AlIr NA RECREATIOL LANDr S 1111 ACRES FLORIDA CONSERVATOR AND , BAYIRIIOCiAN NLLAS 1•Tr w[ TAPPING amel •rF.10V RECREATIONAL LANDS Irlq Osl4CI '� 1N LF V,� ]O,N ACRW 11 1,11/0 v 0 r- -- --- :10.11 ACRES �.�, _ __— -- --- ----jam �Irrcw.nRc� - , L y •----------------------- _ ts"----I_ R[_ IYMw.O1cI • --.. ---1. --.. --1. - - - _ _- -.-1. --.w - .-el 74.....t3....-_- _ It •NA --e ANf--vra•.. —__.�'0f1• ..• -C --v:--_.1r—. 'Vic nI aA=—eAFF_{: . L.—a AR-- eAx-1--e.w---EA--r, — ]l� - OM_=eASA41 N— AiDimaAsr-°-1r—...... [ Few - c v [ [R [R [A [R - - IHA-12I --i [R tR �f' cR-. [R - [R - +T LR --.T- • . • C� l r..". ..1 _ _ HAa '._4' STATE ROAD A.1 -A `� 4__y -_�__IYFw=.IIRc�[_� ��__ -! �! ."� -• _ _ !___ __ u^.' __ *—'":N A� e • •.' t-31 a fuaL— MWWII= I 1 12 III:— Ir — •�ri.vcI.ORCI 4 "'�:✓��-- [R [R LR •( rde Lim► J.r,.�..A._• . --�— — -- ----�',—.�1TP7�1 NM.. a rrrlr .. .�. .1.�----:rr ..:rte— -- ---' •---- -- - ...•— -� NAS r�0� �Cnr �r!rra'lRc]YTREE I tiCTS CVI RES, I I FLORIDA• CONSERVATION AND D.. .• R i N F CY Mw.RIq - � 44.. 1. SYADDI. LEGEND au---.ABBREVNAIIONS' �_ .G.0.• ti• — •p, o:..A .R]cors -arrortAttiaaal - NORTH ® GRAPHIC SCALE *•.:••••....../.11.21.u1 QI' a•RRn.aAoa. (01@' ___.•— m1.av mmlowG.nu. 1 50.70 a r r a 4- 9A /S--112 .511,4,411.75.1.te.• S oz wzsgtt: wssuu 1 4 = zsecgg& .UT, . • .1 ‘. MA RE—USE MAIN INDIAN RIVER COUNTY UTI IES DEPARTMENT "POT—HOUNG" SECTIONS SCI—IULKE, BITTLE & STODDARD, L.L.C. N r 4 $•• -, :' ' '• ", '' \ — • ONE I MOUS* DOWNS • JAW MOM • INAROIMIgt 1{1011711:6 1717 MAN RfVER BIND.. SUITE 201 VERO BEACH. FLORFDA 32960 TEL,7217769:02 FAX172117003496 EMAIL inrsal....."0.,ggs, ..., ..g, ...: Ityrw APPB° r>rso wavaPLuol a t _60 SAN---IXYN1---O SNS---°[ Df BBQ fN'--- ae lxrcl ow “69:77 m+e / ,r Pic WS p0C) BAYT ILL OCEAEI� VILLAS S 90.94 ACRES ,r Pvt.. ORc) Ur .11 ,roww[I pc) 1 MARBRISA SEASIDE VILLAGE S S.17 ACRE4 Ery1- PVC WS ER ` Wc) wr'i --, , P WSMq 1 I 1 rPVC ORc) he 1,-19,11P )MC) A ,rine Lal Ir IRR(. r MRMlR0) • • r PVC Vrolt0val Irwov•wuo rw 4Rq-A 0ARBRISA SEASIDE VILLAGE S 0.17 ACRES 0TRAYEE VILLAS Y 16.10 ACRES J 4' PVC MIMIC) l 0M 1A) Itr NARBRISA 259.20 ACRES 32 UNITS & 67 LOTS SEA COLONY 20.01 ACRES OV MUM, 0 Exc' 0 MA -"I rwo)c Ir .0B)- moi. 9"PW SS (COM 2VB).7 ✓ FA 1 { STATE ROAD A- I -A VCYn,Iwve) $ ,{I } =attar0 i •� J ,R 4" PVC PI(COVB) r PVcasl5OVB) DE SN • 550006) Tr ELJcowl 6ff if 1.0.1.0111 , P007510050) • - ALON DAM 52. CRES -\ %f rNOPEwu1COVB1 F7BwiAR�as. b «.Ri'71- $140vvAnco , a Bu- —:1- 1:_47";-7 CB19STATE F.OAD A -I -A �- r"'BI�YBI �+r w6(���l Man r PVC (WW1 ✓ P„s ACES *4. :a 011 ACRES - _ r Pvcv[u 7Rc) r PVC WY MO.) E/P 9 At-. - --,„ J tisztol- HMI r PVC 61COVB)Vuhs *, r IRR'O) NOIAN TRAILS S 1.09 ACRES C PVC WM(LY[06) N 01 SEA COLONY ±6.75 ACRES 16 LOTS r PVC (COM) / SYMBOL LEGEND ABBREVIATIONS MO • NOW 4111VES • 40, rr.N TRAILS S 10.96 ACRES SS LOTS oil I -- N7 PVC PMICOVB) / ICWEF5 TRAILJ • EsISMOVCCOOd•p14.11•04E ®Pavan PM[ rus,MaPru[,sla. L� J SEA COLONY *6.76 ACRES 16 LOTS _ rBrarlP�—'- - 100 os OCEAN PEARL WEST S 5.66 ACRES 19 LOTS EPN PEARL EAST 219.95 AC RES S LOTS r nic0M(0000) • Y a+ r°Psslc00W MARBRISA S 69.20 ACRES 32 UNITS 5 87 LOTS r Pse ss Dom I r PVC sslC0v6l .1 — • Pvc WM(COVIN "Trec as Ic0V0) 100ve W6lcove) 1-' TO' E/P�E/➢��..j�t ,,✓ /v�O E/P --teni Bit- 4 biy r PVC RA iCOV5) NORTH GRAPHIC SCALE r PVC CLOYS) {i Pm9 11W•Y IrIRR1al st v i 4 a 1 0 J 0 CL 0 0 0 V) etl w m W J 2 0 Sn !IL No 1 i; 2 = wo QZS 4A a"W 'i• 1••••.-�-O[iY�---aW1---dMY---CIW-- rWOW(PLw INC WOK) _ ARBRJSA SEAs10E iI Iir-rum rpm r� rive a,n SIMILES OC tr.vc Hl0ec1 �_ ( -'z'-c. % \ _` • larir iii � / VILLAS CRBRaga ..�-- 'TOP wx MC, tiN1ACRE +'� _ _ L ; ->r- �_ - Y------ — ° -._ SSL -�• -_- _ ...--' - ar_-r' r- ..,._. VP 1 ,TPCWN _ wxlnn ,-' r I raw: moan W� STALE ROAD I A_ yr ` - :. - _� 1 - .... ', - _ _ I - - - ' . _ _ f- _ _ o- _ _ . - _ _ _ . _ o wr IRn - y - _ C j:.. .: 1 r. e ,Yalf' x'Y tRn_l• [ �� !n •• - " wGrieei -- - ' ": yr cn '' En !�r E -�--moi raxwxam .. � / y �R t" 'I.�I - • -.� t ��J�_r .. - 1-„,. M]I pe-- . ,� =-------- rave Ila)+) ,r wxtwc) t 1� i {1A (ACRES MAME. F ci=r r� 11 HI M61 .• {,-'-----,roNo /r _ '---: IP-- wury riA Sl UMTS R 17 Lon it Z) - l • y r -�' T`eI ,�>` I r.n, nn) rm wRICOHI lvti YARBRISA SEAs)0E1 / VILLAGE -T � $�5���j, - SEA COLONY y+�IiA M ACRES �_r.,- % ./ $ L -L GL moo., rL }�• $1.17 ACRES rM, n A o rle w.,eoHl G' I� , •_ ; ,r (COM �A�A " -6Y. •�--- __ 9•'••••••••'_ 4d4'- yi - ----- --------- - AA= �.;...�. _- .J ..• - - -- ---------- 11� - _ __ .. _ . . - . s-. _._ ...., �� - _P� i e•'�'Y�e--E ..��...__-., � V. 'rte=_ .•... r 50.1 IIA1 1 -� t---''�----1-- 1--- -- r` - '---mA.ulrMlrc�1- 1 ,r 1 �` -move i - {--rAKmiwH) --- -- ® -,0 ,»a _� STATE AD.lAa 1----'�N - -----•y-- i v ,f f ~� s _ Ormlmvel) ' - cl xlcovel n ) eOve - --• rave -,e, ' ♦ 1 1 1 - •t, 27 7/4;',-;"•P',„•?///7,•••- 0 v in -✓ KeY11 .1 /e��: / //r _�t' •� J _ T1 -- . --'— 3c-ar.rra. - - J - .. .1N - n'r. zR- -4➢ ..rr_a . •1, •, �" ;f weer N, •a•�� -Na ••• •• -Ifs@��_W. •__ _ _. �T - �rwR N9 A.S. . _-� - ------ - or _ { .L,' IA err __... M ■ i6E IMR8RISA--- (, I1Xt 213.}0 ACRES "` - 0 f• PVC MIM% O SEA COLONY 11.71 ACRES C(" . p -?i IE1 ��_ A VALON SUMS t3S'L.LO:L�] r.n m Nov C� 9'j4r EAN' ' EAer-......Z.:---.1,_ a1rN� c_.,-. 1E rNC `" `' „ `' ° �i.r -_ Ko.)[' 11LSSA '. WPM, rave w.'oo`'q Eton• rrvcmtG0vs1 lCrre rocas/cowl A 1 _ wrrA.sl.. MM IRx an- - --�.—_ ___ - V : .. -OW,. CONI raKwx K0v11 • .' uP - - ._Q.� . _ �((� _ -'�- _ _ �_ 'bn_ ami- _ .: .r-- A� ••a.c a -9 & I t ` ._ . lr7 - - e A •-• , 7s- ,# • - -_- y` .,. -w . .1 r,Kaewx KOHL np - � \ ."Yf.7�t1„•., -,-- _iA A r tr ae N---� STATE ROAD A- ) -n ',vrolcoH)� i ,rrnwYtewlny'f} 1 ,_. - - --- - � _ KOH( 1 � xc `a • . : ,r 0- _ Z� - !if. /,i� nr ,�' _ R _ 1 rPA: 1•1•1I00H1 O I (rl ' _ y -`- N r > 'a% Cf - - rpveMK0vS1 _ _ - /, '•BSL _ _-• _ . _ raverNlc0w1' � �'-�.E_ ...... - tea•. . � � �•1__ --- 7. i A _ ..-.�- l_ -- _ , �• ., r a e M(COYe) 11 .M. SEA COL / NnAK4 1175 ACRESr l /� ) OCEAN PEARL WEST 21.14 ACRES _ •�- --- �- ,YIMGI) 1LOTS 11 m LOTS / mLOn /u {emus T�Iy is Lon ' } i '`�Trl 444/// ---.- Oamoumxamnr•MI ,n -•-••••••=•••.- i.a.1rMery MI ABBREVIATIONS \ . DISIVirtiVieMer...91 ...A MiTI•999•91•IMPOACAMAL ree•••911iMont COMM u NORTH ---"- innro.. x.r, El N ---•• - w a .._ GRAPHIC SCALE yronomay 0 tori-w.acm,rra,•i,..a oe,xeaw. a 1 T T .i.A.,xi mi.a..xc,mx I T --• nn SS S.S,SD,ntn Q roan 1_ _7w 1 0 J 0 CL 0 0 0 V) etl w m W J 2 0 Sn !IL No 1 i; 2 = wo QZS 4A N 00 0110Nv �� STATION. 66.60Sm SECTION 1r AT STATION -352.4.n LOP a 1 2 U 0 E.0 g ztriz z x) Iw O a 4B `ie=iri / IwMIrM ni'w s4ra�..v�i�itP M ?T Wl^= •mGr * .. waeRov ,_ - R m «--e . Ar _Q�---d1 M.� rpvs ((meek .s r u3w' I B< - mMr-.0 C eslCovelI'r P.M. (COM -iii- -• I- — - A if ..N maim r PVC SS(C0V8) VERO BEACH ESTATES EAST 20.38 ACRES , —I 1 rPVC FMI<OV81 N ---}Sq r03P M_ 01 OCEAN PEARL EAST 212.88 ACRES 8 LOTS Q VERO BEACH ESTATES EAST S 8.35 ACRES E/P ��-...r M AqM a-rr M+qe --op �_ .....-__1115_-ice -g, � azolS= .4 r WIM50 oWwMlcglsl ,Yr E/P DIP E/P 1 Ery Ir OP wMICOPEC •,J1 7/ STATE ROAD A -I -A•04 r 3,'-.904—__ti—__—.w._—_ w;Fala;;.; E/P �d4 E/P rPVC FNJP (C.6) (u� OH(WCII ar*4 E/' ER E/P w r a rPVC PM (CCM ; 0•I EA, 4 — a eTAO MCP /> a E• OCEAN PEARL WEST' S S.S4 ACRES 18 LOTS 0 )80IA) - I 1 I� r HOPE we(COWS E -PVC I(COVB) .�t.y�: �'✓Ir3K IN it •-�Fti[.y .FIs. E/0 E E/P E/P et� It Ir WRI-0 lE VERO BEACH ESTATES WEST S3tAS ACRES r H0Pewt(E4ve) CARLTON VEROBPAC SUBDMSION 2 84.111 ACRES 81WCWM(COM 1 .-s EN PLIIPWM(COVB)L/P STATE ROAD A- I -A .4 1 —I- t - it80C FM)COVe) IX�-1,.V��_ EN aaFll Of a •• EP w IP 0M(COVE) P. PVC FM (COM a t 0/ a W �-R Twa`W r VERO BEACH ESTATES WEST 2 31.88 ACRES a0.vax.'N 4a ..CE EL."aa w MY e.:_ cEwR - w CYY !ulaf;;F,���-T; E'Y • rRAI, SYMBOL LEGEND ---.— EFISITOI.AeERQ(). iFIEMOM We E.0-nlerom vwiwwaz ® 4,35•110 xc 4.1 raE Eru (00030 .1310143 MIMS I.VIOSPRICAll. 41111, ME VI Ma (MA•••••1. nE 4 .mWPM IwRCVS - -. EMU. WIDE•214•114DATTI. L -2 .wEPrr ABBREVIATIONS' RC • NOM •IVEA GOWN 6/7 PAW ISLAND PLANTATION SSSAB ACRES 87 LOTS• CONDOS r HOFS WS ICOV81 0 PVC FM ICOV81..."' r%CFM(COVR 4 • :P r Ir WRIA IY l8 L ami .. • lEo -li - -= a.-- .Ir aow (COM 4. MP-I— M,•1 r° -t• 1 E/P - E --�_ WAI-0 NORTH GRAPHIC SCALE r r r r I*048) lY IN9) E i 5 t ie-`itz / E/P AEL E147 Amp. - 1. PVC POI ICOVPI a all tvc SAT./ r1 L .10 a.... • Ir MIA ap• *SI COW) 0,cur.alsr— 7 • 5TA\N 7 RO,,PI T NPIE CCIPIC) 9 OCEAN PEARL BAST t 1215 ACRES LOTS 8 9 ....NS .A VERO BEACH ELTA,TE.AS.EAREIT — - - 1:21 rai4 C/P - .10 e PVC ix (co.P) 113 E/P • 21°1111111110111.111111111111111,01210WRMIMI ‘-‘7515 1111.41411 CR CC PI 40 410111IMMIIIMINNEW....M11111111111•1111411111M1 VERO BEACH ESTATES WEST t 32AS ACRES IT -PASS," VERO BEACH ESTATES EAST 2479 ACRES 77 ct �. )10/111.1 /CO.) PVC WV KOH •OL •Nt mt. r-nr. Is-Pwc P , A!N AD4.I-- =E pr4s a:PAMont) SEP IP PVC W- M (CCOMT.IC "PfM1P( C171)O1 RCt SATEROAD A. -A EP E/T E/rPNc/5)7 2 CARLTON MO BEACH SUBDIVISION * 14,11 ACRES 'V1 9 a NIC - • i k icon) r100/E.NOVS) R a gs'I.iCpO VERO BEACH ESTATES WEST *TIM ACRES INI111111111111111, JIMMilmag III2r•Vp 7)4 t. jr4.ta Pvcws (coy., ,011.141,00.I5) 0 — -0 1 - co.rtsia6As 474 4 EIP ' It AI— — 1.1 IT PP IT PRP) PALM ISLAND PLANTATION t 11111 *3 10* 117 LOTS • CONDOS AA•mmr• !NOP! 0:0V11) -AWL • 4 t " NOPE WS IGO SY141101LEGEP0 L.BBREPATIONS. ............ WM. 94PA5IP401 PM Ma 1.1”10.03410..1•Ctt .......).!....e nil. ...).....„.1). —3 C4111110/151at PIC•Mln.eDLIMI1OLONVI MOH • 11..talefire POLVtIlolea UST. KIWI 111.01.14.141.1 0.010 VIM CM •St- .............. ...141wk.101164 Cr, Sr. MENO WARM — — —•..— (112.011XOLNIZOINIMIT Mt LJ NM Ill NORTH CRAPMC SCALE 8 5A Tita iTZ 1 G666gg i e Ti 6s6ssggg “4 L' 1'I 6G6'a6urt, C> 13 T. 6G'e664g4 6G66'g;,6 0 / AIA RE—USE MAIN INDIAN RIVER COUNTY UTILITIES DEPARTMENT N. "POT—HOLING" SECTIONS SCHULKE, BITTLE & STODDARD, L.L.C. pe a 31171.47M p • WO RAW • OMRONAIENAL PRICTINC I COMM ' a "0= 01.6t03 1117 INDIAN RIVER BLVD.. Sure 201 VERO BEAON, FLORIDA 32660 TEL 17717706Q2 FAX 772/770 496 EMAIL ireo(Es6snBmetn.mm dr • J FF n f _b in::: Pry 1 �I roPvn lCC'lal• 1 t�rwrewaNww A,•,•,,,,, qA �__ a ___I__—__I—__y___ Imo_ __y �je) KP.N a W — w 1 aPY_Pq�_ I �� �—IX � ..aM Iraml-0 CARLTON VERO BEACH SUBDIVISION S 14J1 ACRES 11 r Pvc wR /rA.,, �. 6....41.4PAUE ISLAND PLANTATION / �lOMN's lsuND' CABANAS u cm. ANMAN 1 1 V��.4 STAMCRES J 3 _p,,� 4w =urwP. ¢ar�usw/- —mt..' wiiuLS !!'UIl/ITGYIENI —M•.. 1+_: d1� aa11�P AA- —�I.A-- a:,.........r.r.:::::—Ae• e AA-y-0ar__ Jr1, �r � 7r-.A.vr Pve es mar TAM ROAD A. I I.9 •°` Tr Irmw0lr 17.7v sirui T/P-1— i me aiWA% —4ati ---aw_.f-,CTRJl —?- --611.x. —..OL pP——a® ..AIKAA ETT' -c cP .�.... _. f Iron to a moi.. .3e, �m• .1O0 �r I1_ I1 1E PAW ISLAND PLANTATION SUM ACRES 17 LOTS. CONDOS NNW 416( 01. RIVER CLUB AT CARLTON CONDOS !11.1$ACRES sYNBOLIECEHO LOST.O.MA 11.10:1 PIN ti W.A..ou 1E1 MOIL 49.1.41 �.�_ .e,.�.,�...,,...n.... G rm.vwwumu WIMP,/ ABBREVIAO0Ns' “Ort 0.131•001111,%1111.1.OG 1,111111.111 4'wC,S(00va) NORTH GRAPHIC SCALE T 1 T T T t (ono) l ar.s w Ir PVCEN I00,V s 1 CARLTON VERO BEACH SUBDIVISION *11.01 ACRES • -'...{--I.IS--- •a-.aElr-a--IOW7:,...:1-2± .7"L: Fav 1 �ml(o�ova --a • ..-- r�ram..Dove IAAl a rM vn ICONS 2 liifiri.ii.4._ SN cN CR ¢/P ,r INC rMICOVIN R --an--- a---an---nry---nn raAys ▪ 0411, I;.▪ r-C'ZY-.� - rPona wa Imus) PALE ISLAND PLANTATION 131148 ACRES t/ LOTS • CONDOS 1IE rll� PALM ISLAND PLANTATION CABANAS S 2.31 ACRES Itis/ ++ql.�� -_. --=a~- a` al.N_-eAN---�.lsc..a--e. \\ a.---aw5.- Ir aPwN imva � a r - �r MY Koval„ qP TATE ROAD , l,A .✓ ---- -vbyyl:2 - - -I- - --- --2- 1 I^ t l .I�l, • an - - -Van -J.! IrnL.m G JOHN'S ISLAO Of APO r Mrn(m7a A —a • - ra---o r MSvx CUM) -a+r --ar— IrorP(*aa Ir orwx rcoPEI rr RcwiCR -) - - IY' RNER CLUB AT CARLTON CONDOS S tt,11 ACRES :1 rx umJJr usaar 9avNA.15I //%I lrHaPf+4Cove.J ■A ani 0 rPVC •N Imus) Ir PVC / I ` cN a - - cn- — cn• r IT- �= BT �I - - mar ;,jam a - : `,0-�TM'r �;?`-a IN u2 =� tr cal...alcove) 1=I 1r0PRR(coal 1 : 1 r' :'0 C.' .A, STATE ROAD A. I •A •'''' ,✓ _ r_ _}_ _ __I_ __ _ - - _ _ - ___ _ _ ,,,,..7,a,..- xArilr 0 __ -------I---_-- 1 Nacwlmva ( wlCoval .) a _ -. - -��--- - . . _, - am r afi'� a =--� -c Ir orwmrcovaJt 11 4 Ir PA IN 5TMDOL LEOENQ • LCITNOCATCX PAN •••__u • MI. ION --� nox.PI O61141111t ! 1.10.1041•443 PAM. • xt Nxtgt.u111,6 CR1 MT ABBREVIATIONS' A- paws awe r xorerrlrcwa�! �� ICPVC AWaE(U14 YKI IAP *0403000*1 NORTH GRAPHIC SCATS T T T T (anal 1y-tl cn n S 0 I° 8A PIZ t 6 6 6 CO 5 MA RE -USE MANI INDIAN REYER COUNTY UTIUTIES DEPARTMENT "POT-HOUNG. SECTIONS I SCHULKE, SITTLE &-STODDARD, L.L.C. Olt * smowatt meows PIRARAM2 '04600.01ffit frial7TING contIM 51, 4$044.10s 0.0te 7717 INDIAN RIVER BLVO„. SUM 2O VERO REACH, FLORIO& 32980 TEL 772i X70.622 VAX 772/77041974 EMAILinto*RbonguRentom j WATER TREATMENT WNW N CJI SYMBOL LEGEND VAR. WNW. -•-- EamwratuWWW Ms/ RL EMT. WNW. ▪ .Tal MTN _—•• _ Imnagrsm.wowRvnw 4 rW▪ T..TA ra�txrae NG DTAw.NATOT,TRre WINNRMROF.MOMN NTNT LJ SORT NI ABBREVIATIONS COW MA. NORTH GRAPHIC SCALE ? T T 7 i• AIA RE—USE MAIN MOAN RIVER COUNTY UTILITIES DEPARTMENT SEA OAKS 3M WASTE WATER TREATMENT PLANT SCHULKE, BITTLE & STODDARD, L.L.C. COI & s17ACfl OMEN& • tAte RAW • MIRCNIMMAL MOOTING C1PMC.4111 or r000.0200 rco *IMO 1117 114201N MIER BLVD. SLUE 201 VERO BEACH. FLORIDA =so TEL 2721 7204522 fAX1172117043490 EMAllSteetoorrol000rs.a. 26 rt. 60 - t I 1 il 1 . , ' t' I ill I, tz!! 'fl in L. le rt. Ig ; - 7-4 1#741 Alt" .;:a ,. , I. 1111 - ' . %x , .1, ,. I i ,.; . , ' t' I ill I, tz!! 'fl in Ig ; - 7-4 1#741 Alt" .;:a ,. , 4. [ r 1 , 1 1T r t a : , • 1 -P: .* ' • ' ' ' , "'t 1 ' 41 ' , ) • 1111' r:,--.------• L. i !fl 1r. '4 '- '. '' i . ' S re • i.g . -, , ., 'P' - — - 5 .., , ,. 1 ' fi __,,,,„ . 0 , . . •. ,.,, it/ ---,4 ,',, ,G0/;•41 ; 5. '----, , t« r '/.. , r'. . ' ,, , 4.-- r '' .- . - ` tf . . , ' • . . , fill ti i ti 111111 0 0 AIA RE -USE MAIN INDIAN RIVER COUNTY UTIUTIES DEPARTMENT SOIL BORING REPORT l.! f' i • .,..t.t., 'v... • 1 i fill ti i ti 111111 • 1111' r:,--.------• L. le ; I - l.! f' i • .,..t.t., 'v... • ri 1 f i fill ti i ti 111111 • 1111' r:,--.------• L. le l.! f' i • .,..t.t., 'v... • ,f it fl9 fill ti i ti 111111 • 1111' , • 11 L. :to ; I l.! f' i • ' 1 e " ;•.--__i II .11 ,1111 ! I fill ti i ti 111111 . l.! f' i .. 111 : ' 1 e " ;•.--__i II .11 ,1111 ! ' I' 9 ' 1: 1 i -J. . , • 11 l.! f' i .. 111 : ' • 1 i -J. : `1 di •.. , SCHULKE, BITTLE & STODDARD,' L.L.C. ow a mama macaw • !NV PUMAS • 011IROAKVAL FERMIUM 0,11111,401 Of PLINCOUTC•I 00005111111 1717 MAN RIVER BLVD., SLUE 201 VERO BEACH. FLORIDA 32902 TEL 772 / 7709022 FAX 772 / 7704198 EMAIL trlognbsongineors.com EFS .4 MU I V. INDIAN RIVER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONER'S MEETING APRIL 23, 2019 H ISTORY > December, 2004: 2004 Water, Wastewater & Reclaimed Water Master Plan prepared by PBS&J identified a 16" Reuse main along A1A & Converting the Sea Oaks WWTP to Storage & Re -pump Facility > March, 2007: 2007 Reclaimed Water Reuse Implementation Plan prepared by Brown & Caldwell; Project R -010 -Extend service from the Sea Oaks WWTP (converted to storage under WWTP-7) south along A1A to the John's Island Development > December, 2011: BCC approved W.O. No. 1 to SBS to perform a conceptual design & hydraulic analysis to facilitate reclaimed water service to Indian River Shores and the North Barrier Island (south of CR 510) > March, 2012: Stop work was issued to SBS > December, 2018: BCC approved W.O. No. 3 to SBS to engage them in an engineering feasibility analysis to run transmission/distribution main along A1A with a storage/ re -pump station > April 23, 2019: Present Results of the engineering feasibility study z Z �Io 0 -o 0 m 0 A 2 m 3 A f nm PROPOSED 2007-2008 REUSE WATER MAINS PROPOSED 2008-2009 REUSE WATER MAINS PROPOSED 2009.2010 REUSE WATER MAINS PROPOSED 2010.2011 REUSE WATER MAINS PROPOSED 2011-2012 REUSE WATER MAINS r 1 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT - - - - EXIST1NG REUSE WATER MAINS zr -. EXCERPTS FROM PREVIOUS MASTER PLANS Executive' Summary Table ES -22 County Recommended Reclaimed Water System Improvements PROJECT No. DESCRIPTION 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025 PROJECT 1 CONVERT 8" LATERAL "G" FORCE MAIN TO REUSE MAIN. $50,000 PROJECT 2 CONVERT 16" 77TH ST BRINE LINE TO REUSE MAIN. $50,000 _ (PROJECT -3) (24"DIRECTIONALBORE'REUSE MAIN UNDERINDIAN RIVER L'AGOON) $2,500;000 (PROJECT 4) ("CONSTRUCT16".REUSE MAIN ALONG;CR510-AND'SRAIA TO. SEA OAKS $350.000 '{PROJECT (ON VERT SEA -OAKS WVVrF TO STORAGE -AND REPUMP FACILITY) 82.430.000 PROJECT 6 CONSTRUCT rF A 5 MGD RIB SITE ADJACENT TO CENTRAL REGIONAL $860;000 PROJECT'7 PERMIT FOR ADDITIONAL 2 MGD AT WEST REGIONAL $7,000 PROJECT 8 (ALT 1) CONSTRUCT A 5 MGD RIB SITE ADJACENT TO SOUTH REGIONAL VWVTF AND A 16", 9,000' REUSE TRANSMISSION MAIN. PROJECT 8, (ALT 2) CONSTRUCT A 16" REUSE TRANSMISSION MAIN PARALLEL TO EXISTING MAIN SOUTH REGIONAL TO WEST REGIONAL WETLANDS. $4,100,000 PROJECT 9 CONSTRUCT 5 MGD WETLANDS NEAR OR ADJACENT TO NORTH WVVTF. $1,012.000 PROJECT 10 UPGRADE EFFLUENT QUALITY AT CENTRAL REGIONAL TO PERMIT PUMPING TO AWETLAND SITE. 82.000,000 PROJECT 11 ADD ONE PUMP TO'EXSITING WETWELL AT CENTRAL REGIONAL VWVTF. $32.000 PROJECT 12 UPGRADE PUMPING SYSTEM CENRAL SERVICE TO WEST REGIONAL WETLANDS OR FUTURE WETLANDS SITE. 86.850.000 PROJECT 13 CONSTRUCT 24" REUSE TRANSMISSION MAIN ALONG,CR 510 TO CR 512 FOR FELLSMERE AND SEBASTIAN. $15,000,000 PROJECT 14 CONSTRUCT 5 MGD VVETLANDS NEAR OR ADJACENT TO WEST WETLANDS. $15.25M TOTAL $10,347,000 $1,012,000 $2,032,000 $21,860,000 $16.26M ES -49 Indian River County Mester Plan -Update PBS&J 4071124.XX Final Report December 2004 ANALYSIS Primary Focus of the Feasibility Study ➢ Existing Utility Locates: • Contacted ALL Utility Providers within the corridor • Obtained ALL available As -Built Drawings • A licensed Utility Contractor excavated from the EOP to R/W every 750' interval & recorded the location & depth of ALL utilities encountered ➢ Hydraulic Modeling • WaterCad software was utilized to perform the hydraulic analyses • Modeling included existing infrastructure from the Hobart tank over the Wabasso Causeway to A1A • Four (4) Scenarios (A, B, C, & D) for 3 different configurations were modeled ➢ Preliminary Opinion of Probable Cost • Geotechnical data was obtained to ascertain the soil suitability for HDD construction • OPC was broken into Transmission, Distribution, Storage & Re -Pump, and Soft Cost New Transmission/Distribution Main with Storage/Re-Pump Station at Sea Oaks: >ALL Barrier Island Communities along A1A potentially could receive reclaimed via storage/re- pump station GRAPHIC SCALE 1000 ��-500 2000� (IN FEET 1 hKh. 1000 R. ,1 0M. PO DSC, 1010 EG01 0703 DOM NM, I/•1 t D ' 10111111■■a• to MN, 13 21076 MA 1147 /! MEI 03060 • 4-,. • osel• 1AIr1. �I nflla IilII 1 X111 11111WM11H1 11..1...... ._ • 2000 Y P9 4— SIMS MO 0034.0 Otto 01 Fla 011.10 •OWAL /GIIe•00 tarns 20076 _CI 6170 P9 IRCCUS UTRJTY SERVICE AREA COVE UTILITY SERVICE AREA 151,11536 CONOOS 20147 WL( a503Le0 P9 F1W 0000. 0111:4 100 0-76 .w soft �00 a Ai SWAIM WONT CUM 20011 WC* 84.0 PA m 6 F1« 06117 MU 47.22FA HRt»m A0 w MCR .11•STA OATS •111T 4-,03 CTSMT1 EST 0Wa.IOX MAO PS IF11ii.i Eunlutuu■a IF = - ane 2Pam wt MOO AA c y° 11. JAW 0100 UM SPA CROOT .1-10 001Era".1 WIT D'ART/1t F.4' 3 ♦`'i, OA1) , Iwo •• `I , FW • A-rn W)CRNOSE 0' NOIM11NP *254050 01�2R11m UW a.:``aatYJ ® ■ PA ^i �■■■ 1■1M -i`i�% law • ■i E I. roijr1 p iwo ri 11 MN IM f E • , it. ' f4RA- = MU; ill %k 11 1 v MOH IAII LIT Ms. rr■ No < 1 it` L VA 1.4161: I. � � ��� _ 1 1f'na IIIV *coma, 1, V .-,m Mr NowPOTTO 17.7.1 dew 4- RE -USE VOLUME SUMMARY f 1RCOUS SERVICE AREA ,1.554 MGD 1011M5 !SAND / 1.000 3300 POTENTIAL COVDSERJICE AREA / 0.153 MOD TOTAL RE-USEVOWAEE / 3.116 M00 EL GEND • SERVICEN0010 — EKISTINO SERVICE — FUTURE SERVICE - MST. FEED FROM HOSART TANK — PROP. FEED FROM HOBART TANK - EXIST. FEED FROM SEA OAKS TWOS - PROP. FEED FROM SEA OAKS WW TP A1A REUSE MAIN EX -07 CONFIGURATIONS EVALUATED - CONTINUED New Transmission/Distribution Main, Storage/Re-Pump Station At a Later Date: >ALL Barrier Island Communities south & north of CR -510 along A1A will receive reclaimed via existing & proposed transmission/distribution main. GRAPHIC SCALE 1500 mao FEET 1 Imh 1000 R. IRCOUS UTILITY SERVICE AREA COVB UTILITY SERVICE AREA J�i5�1 RE -USE V )LUME SUMMA IRCOUSSEmnaAREA /ORRSIRAMD RV 0 MIA 1.000 MGo POTENTIAL cove 5E10.10E AREA / 0.153 MGO 00301REUSE VW/HIE 7 5116 MGD LEGEND • SEkVICE NODES — ExTOT00000EE FUTURE SERVICE - EAST. FEED FROM NORART TAM( - PROP. FEED FROM NOEART TANK A1A REUSE MAIN EX -09 CONFIGURATIONS EVALUATED - CONTINUED New Transmission/Distribution Main with Storage/Re-Pump Station at Sea Oaks: >ALL Barrier Island Communities south of CR -510 along A1A will receive reclaimed via storage/re-pump station. North of CR -510 Communities fed via existing main. GRAPHIC SCALE 0 1000 1500 2000 (1N FEET) 1 605. 1000 R. IRCDUS UTILITY SERVICE AREA _ COVB UTIUTY SERVICE AREA ua� I 0-17 astars 14310 MCP MST Waal WS IIIIS PS a F�U a0 InmmnnIItIJ _em s� � ni 6010m11 ISPO P9 MOM 11034.1 04,1 Pal ROOM //.2T 6170 PS RE -USE VOLUME SUMMARY/ 1RCDUS SERVICE AREA ,4.065 MED 1011t151LAND 1 / 5.000 MOD POTENTIAL COWS SERVICE AREA / 0.153 000 TOTAL REUSE VOLUME / 3.116 MOD LEGEND EIMICE NOOES - IDOSTRIO SERVICE • FUTURE SERVICE EXIST. FEED FROM NOSART TAMC PROP. FEED FROM 6OSART TANK - EXIST. FEED FROM SEA OAKEI WWTP PROP. FEED FROSI SFA OAKS WWTP U J ci 8 8 N co m U, A1A REUSE MAIN $°fiAPe EX -08 OPINION OF PROBABLE COST GRAPHIC SCALE 0 1000 1500 2000 (IN FEET) finch= 1000 ft. TRANSMISSION MAIN COST $ 1.5 MILLION DISTRIBUTION MAIN COST $ 2.2 MILLION 1110 d1 110 ■ rap. ■■. 0111 KW Alla ■■a ■ $0 001 0 ,!�m 0011 isallilitA ���� � X11■ 11111111 �� Alto. ■11�� !rrrrrl� ��� y ,A■ ■U■ ■■•r . \IIInuiwr ii UIr111�.i ■■. 11111enma W- -4;,p pi■■■■ ■■■m ?1 RAGE: ': L i P FACI Roo 11 3.1 M r OTHER COST ✓ HOBART PUMP STATION UPGRADES: $200,000.00 ✓ SOFT COST (I.E. DESIGN, BIDDING, CEI): $485,875.00 1 1 Vol 77TH STREET STORAGE & REPUMP Google Maps: Street View 2011 Google Maps: Aerial Time unknown CONCEPTUAL PROFILE DEPICTION Assumed B • RECOMMENDATION > SBS Recommends Scenario C-2, Depicted on Exhibit EX -08: • New 16" transmission line to Sea Oaks • New Storage & Re -Pump Station at Sea Oaks, • New 12" distribution line south from Sea Oaks to JI > IRCDUS offers the following for consideration: • If BCC Elects A1A route o Direct staff to re -negotiate A1A project cost with JI o Direct staff work with Sea Oaks on the logistics of proposed storage tank/re-pump facility o Direct staff to prepare RFQ for engineering services • If BCC Elects the Sub -Aqueous Route o Table the A1A study for future use o Continue with the UCP and ROW permitting process PIPE INSPECTION- REPORT ISSUED 2017 ➢ (2) 12" Pipes • Same a (1) 16" pipe >Visual Inspections >Coupon testing >Pipe Integrity >Hanger system Integrity ➢ Lateral movement >Coastal Exposure ➢In service 1995 • 22+ years of operation at time of report 1 1 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY UTILITIES DEPARTMENT REPORT OF REUSE WATER PIPELINE INSPECT/ONS WABASSO BRIDGE CROSSINGS OF THE INDIAN RIVER PREPARED BY: CARTER ASSOCIATES, INC CONSULTING ENGINEERS AND LAND SURVEYORS COA 205/L0 20S 1708 2r Street Vero Reach, FL 32960 Telephone: (771) 362-4191 September. 1017 PIPE INSPECTION — RECOMMENDATION IN 2017 > Do Nothing • Loss of est. 25% or 0.12" thickness • Can last another 10 years • Another evaluation in 2026 • Fluid not pumped at design pressure class >Replace • Both 12" lines $1.8M (2016 $$)* • Single 16" line $ 1.3M (2016)* • Pipe costs ^' same $260K (2016)* Recommendation: • Adequate thickness to maintain 350 psi for another 10 years • Operate until 2026 • Replacement of one 16" pipe, not dual 12" more economical • FPVC recommended • Evaluate integrity in 2026 and determine path forward at that time *Note: The above costs are for comparison only and do not constitute the complete costs of the entire scope of work for the replacement of the existing pipes. /34 County Attorney's Matters - B.C.C. 4.23.19 Office of INDIAN RIVER COUNTY ATTORNEY Dylan Reingold, County Attorney William K. DeBraal, Deputy County Attorney Kate Pingolt Cotner, Assistant County Attorney MEMORANDUM TO: Board of County Commissioners FROM: Dylan Reingold, County Attorney DATE: April 17, 2019 SUBJECT: Temporary Construction Easement For Hole in the Wall Island and Pine Island for Reuse Line BACKGROUND On December 5, 2017, the Indian River County Board of County Commissioners ("Board") entered into an agreement with John's Island Water Management, Inc., ("JIWM") for Indian River County ("County") to provide reclaimed water to JIWM. Reclaimed water is available at the County reclaimed water facility located at 77th Street (the "Agreement"). At its own expense, JIWM is required to design, obtain all necessary permits, and construct a reclaimed water transmission line to County and Florida Department of Environmental Protection ("DEP") requirements to deliver the reclaimed water from the County 77th Street facility to JIWM. JIWM is currently in the permitting process to obtain permits from the County and DEP. As part of the permitting process, DEP has requested that the County either sign the permit application as a co -applicant or provide temporary easements to JIWM to install the subaqueous crossing from the west side of the Indian River Lagoon ("IRL") at 69th Street to Old Winter Beach Road on the east side of the IRL. On July 10, 2018, the Board approved a temporary construction easement under 69th Street, Old Winter Beach Road and the County owned bridge tender property at the west end of Old Winter Beach Road. By providing the easements, the County will not become an applicant on the project and will limit liability during the permitting and/or construction of the project. After the Board approved the temporary construction easement, JIWM requested that the Indian River County Mosquito Control District ("District") provide an easement for the construction under Hole -in -the - Wall Island. The District voted not to approve the easement for the project. On February 18, 2019, the chairman of the District wrote me the attached letter stating that the District "believes that the County does not possess any ownership interest in Hole in the Wall Island..." Documents received from the District indicate that their attorney in 2009, at the time the District obtained Hold in the Wall Island, noted that it appeared that the County had a road easement over the island. Douglas Carlson, Executive Director for the Director in an email to Jason Brown and myself, dated January 16, 2019, stated that "[i]n the Board meeting minutes that I provided to you on Monday, you will see that Michael O'Haire determined in 2009 that IRC did have a right-of-way across Hole -in -Wall which was based on a 2009 title search." On April C l UsersllegistarlAppDatalLomflTemplBCL TechnologiesleastPDF 81@BCL@BOODC7DCI@BCL@BOODC7DCdoc 218 Board of County Commissioners April 17, 2019 - Page 2 of 3 16, 2019, Louis "Buck" Vocelle, Jr. sent a letter to the Board stating that "IRMCD does not recognize that IRC has any ownership interest in Hole -in -the -Wall Island." Mr. Vocelle's letter is attached. Mr. Vocelle's letter references a memo written by former County Attorney, then Deputy County Attorney, William G. Collins II, dated May 7, 2001, which is also attached. Since then, JIWM approached the County claiming that the County owns a 70 -foot wide right-of-way over Hole -in -the -Wall Island where the proposed reuse pipe would be constructed and thus sought another temporary construction easement over Hole -in -the -Wall Island from the County. The County Attorney's Office researched the issue as to whether the County owned the right-of-way over Hole -in -the -Wall Island. It appears that the County does have ownership of the right-of-way over Hole - in -the -Wall Island. On December 3, 2018, Brian Seymour, from the Gunster law firm wrote a letter to me stating that "Nile County's ownership is evidenced in two separate title documents." Mr. Seymour's letter is attached. The first basis identified by Mr. Seymour is from 1923 when St. Lucie County as predecessor to the County claimed for public use a 70 -foot wide strip of land across Hole in the Wall Island, Pine Island, and upland portions across from Pine Island to the Atlantic Ocean. A copy of the Minute Book page, which was attached to the letter from Mr. Seymour, is attached. As noted by Mr. Seymour, the right-of-way was developed and used for roadway purposes. Mr. Seymour also pointed out that in November 1959, the County received fee simple interest over the 70 - foot right-of-way strip from Fred and Adriana Tuerk. By the record found in Official Records Book 86, Page 292, Tuerk conveyed fee simple interest to the County of a 70 -foot strip over Hole in the Wall Island, which was located 35 feet on either side of the centerline of what was referred to as Winter Beach Bridge Road. Mr. Seymour concluded that he was unable to find that the County had ever abandoned its interest in the right-of-way obtained in 1923 nor conveyed the ownership of the right-of-way that was received from the Tuerk family. It has been pointed out that the Option Agreement among the Estate of Fred R. Tuerk, et als. and Lost Tree Village Corporation, dated October 8, 1968, refers to the November 1959 record merely as an easement. Additionally, the Indian River Property Appraiser website does not indicate County ownership over the right-of-way over Hole -in -the -Wall Island. However, the recorded document refers to the transfer of fee simple interest to the County. This position was analyzed by the County Surveyor and Public Works Department who share the opinion that the right-of-way is still owned by the County. This position is consistent with the position taken by the County Attorney's Office back in the late 1990's and early 2000's. A letter from Paul Bangel, dated October 10, 2001 is attached. Please note that at that time two attorneys from the Gunster law firm wrote letters claiming that the County did not own the right-of-way over Hole -in -the -Wall Island. One of those letters accused the County of making a "late -blooming and spurious claim." These letters, which are attached, appear at odds with the most recent opinion issued by the Gunster law firm. In the spring of 1999, the County Attorney's Office requested Atlantic Coastal Title Corporation to perform a chain of title report, which concluded title was with Horse's Head, Ltd. The report did not include any information about the November 1959 record. The report, which is attached, did contain an informational note about the St. Lucie County reservation. I have reached out to Jason Beal, who had prepared the chain of title report, about the issue, however he said it could cost the County up to $1,500 to perform additional analysis of the issue. In December 1959, the Board adopted a resolution, which is attached, where all county roads, with some limited exceptions, within the Town of Indian River Shores were expressly abandoned. Section F (of the C.IUsersliegistarWppDataiLocallTempIBCL TeclmologiesleasyPDF8I@BCL©BOODC7DCIQBCL(a)BOODC7DC doc 219 Board of County Commissioners April 17, 2019 - Page 3 of 3 1959 resolution states "[a]ny and all other public County roads situated within the limits of the Town of Indian River Shores EXCEPT ..." The property exclusions to Section F do not appear to include Hole - in -the -Wall Island. There has been an argument that the right-of-way was not a County road, but was actually a State Road at that time and thus was not abandoned by the County. However, there is no evidence of when the state jurisdiction passed back to the County in later years. Finally, it has been argued that the County's rights have been extinguished through the Marketable Record Title Act. However, section 712.03, Florida Statutes specifically excludes "[r]ecorded or unrecorded easements or rights, interest or servitude in the nature of easements, rights-of-way and terminal facilities, including those of a public utility or of a governmental agency, so long as the same are used and the use of any part thereof shall except from the operation hereof the right to the entire use thereof." I have confirmed with the County Surveyor that the County does still use a part of the areas dedicated to the County in fee simple in November 1959. Thus, I believe that the Marketable Record Title Act does not extinguish the County's interest in the 70 -foot strip over Hole -in -the -Wall Island. I will note that although the analysis provided above has been centered on Hole -in -the -Wall Island, the same analysis applies to Pine Island. Although the issue is murky, I do believe that the County does own the 70 -foot wide right-of-way strip over Hole -in -the -Wall Island and Pine Island. Thus, consistent with the Board action taken on July 10, 2018, I recommend that the Board approves a temporary construction easement consistent in nature as the prior temporary construction easement for the reuse pipe project. Please note that pursuant to section 3 of the Agreement, JIWM is responsible for providing the bill of sale and grants of easements to the County for the reuse pipe. As previously explained to JIWM, JIWM will need to provide the necessary title work to demonstrate that the County has title to the 70 foot strip over both islands. FUNDING No funding is necessary for this item. JIWM will pay for the costs of the recording of the temporary construction easement. RECOMMENDATION The County Attorney's Office recommends that the Indian River County Board of County Commissioners approve the granting of a temporary construction easement, similar in form to that approved by the Board on July 10, 2018, and authorize the Chairman to execute said easement on behalf of the County upon review and approval of the easement by the County Attorney and County Surveyor as to form and legal sufficiency. ATTACHMENTS Example Temporary Constriction Easement Letter from Indian River County Mosquito Control District, dated February 18, 2019 Letter from Brian Seymour, dated December 3, 2018, with attachments Letter from Paul Bangel, dated October 10, 2001, with attachment Letter from William Hyde, dated May 4, 1999, with attachment Letter from Ernest Cox, dated November 9, 2001 Atlantic Coastal Title Corporation Chain of Title Report dated April 7, 1999 Letter from Louis "Buck" Vocelle, Jr., dated April 16, 2019 Memo from William G. Collins II, dated May 7, 2001 C IUsersllegismrUppDalalLocallTempIBCL TechnologiesleasyPDF 81( BCL@B00DC7DCI@BCL@B00DC7DCdoc 220 Prepared by and return to: Indian River County Attorney's Office 1801 27th Street TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT This TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT, made and executed t day of • , 2018, by Indian River County, a political subdivision of th- tate of Florida, whose address is 1801 27th Street, Vero Beach, Florida 32960-3388 hereinafter called GRANTOR, to Johns Island Water Management, Inc., a Florida Not F Profit Corporation, whose address is 1 Turtle Beach Road Vero Beach, FL 32963, herei after called GRANTEE, WITNESSETH: That GRANTOR, for and in consideration of the sum of ONE DOLLAR and other consideration, receipt of which is hereby acknowledg= d, does hereby grant unto the GRANTEE a TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASE NT on, over, across, and beneath the following described land, situate in Indian River Co - nty, Florida, to -wit: EXHIBIT "A" ATTACHED HERETO AND + DE A PART HEREOF This easement is for the purpose of conduct' boring, pipe installation, dewatering, gra dredging, etc., authorized under Departme the [name of project goes here]. This e Grantor for the operation and ma Environmental Protection permit # automatically expire. This easeme all necessary Utilities and Public construction activities, such as; directional ing, sloping, sodding, clearing, excavating, of Environmental Protection permit # for ement shall exist until the permit is transferred to tenance phase, or until Florida Department of expires, at which time this easement shall does not relieve GRANTEE of the obligation to obtain orks permits from GRANTOR. IN WITNESS WHEREOF the first above written. Signed in the presence o the following witnesses: sign: print : t RANTOR has herein set its hand and seal the day and year sign: print: JOHNS ISLAND WATER MANAGEMENT, INC. By: Title: STATE OF/FLORIDA COUNTYOF /Acknowledged before me this day of , 2018 by , as of ' Johns Island. Water Management, Inc, a Florida 'Not For Profit Corporation, with full authorization from its • 221 board, who is either personally known to me or has produced (driver's license/passport) as identification. SEAL: NOTARY PUBLIC: sign: print: Commission No.: • Commission Expiration: Approv-. as to Form and Legal ufficiency: 222 Prepared by and retum to: ,Indian River County Attorney's Office 1801 27th Street Vero Beach, FL 32960 3120180044207 RECORDED IN THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF JEFFREY R SMITH, CLERK OF COURT INDIAN RIVER COUNTY FL BK: 3134 PG: 99 Page 1 of 10 7/19/2018 8:44 AM D DOCTAX PD $0.70 TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT This TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT, made and executed this 13t relay of July , 2018, by Indian River County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, whose address is 1801 27th Street, Vero Beach, Florida 32960, hereinafter called GRANTOR, to John's Island Water Management, Inc., a Florida not for profit corporation, whose address is 1 Turtle Beach Road, Vero Beach, FL 32963, hereinafter called GRANTEE, WITNESSETH: That GRANTOR, for and in consideration of the sum of ONE DOLLAR and other consideration, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, does hereby grant unto the GRANTEE a TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT on, over, across, and beneath the following described land, situate in Indian River County, Florida, to -wit: EXHIBIT "A" ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE A PART HEREOF This easement is for the purpose of conducting construction activities, such as; directional boring, pipe installation, dewatering, grading, sloping, sodding, clearing, excavating, dredging, etc., authorized under Department of Environmental Protection permit application # 357074-001 for the Johns Island Water Management Subaqueous Reuse Pipe. This easement shall exist until the permit is transferred to GRANTOR for the operation and maintenance phase, or until Florida Department of Environmental Protection permit for permit application #357074-001 expires, at which time this easement shall automatically expire. GRANTEE shall return the land to the same condition as it was found at the beginning of this easement. This easement does not relieve GRANTEE of the obligation to obtain all necessary Utilities and Public Works permits from GRANTOR. GRANTOR shall in no way be liable or responsible for any accident or damage that may occur in conjunction with any of the activities described in this easement. GRANTEE shall defend, hold harmless and indemnify GRANTOR with respect to any and all actions, causes of action, liabilities, losses, damages or expenses (including reasonable attorneys' fees) arising out of or relating to any negligence, intentional misconduct or breach of applicable law by GRANTEE in conjunction with any of the activities described in this easement. This Temporary Construction Easement is to be recorded in the public records of Indian River County, Florida; and GRANTEE shall record a release or termination of the Temporary Construction Easement at the applicable time of either permit transfer or expiration as indicated above. 1 IN WITNESS WHEREOF the GRANTOR has herein set its hand and seal the day and year first above written. ATTEST: Jeffrey R. Smith, Clerk of Circuit Court and Comptroller By. 1006 Deputy Clerk Approved as to form and legal sufficie By: Dylan Reingeld, County Attorney .i. conrM;, O" INDIAN RIVER COUNTY ';�� +s%.�. .�NQ By: Peter D.O'Bryan,Chairn �', Board of County Cornmissione�'SReQuriri�'F`.:"-•" BCC approved: July 10, 2018 ACCEPTANCE John's Island Water Management, Inc., a Florida not for profit corporation, hereby accepts the within Temporary Construction Easement and agrees to the terms thereof. Dated this /73 day of '- cf1 , 2018. Signed 'in, the presence of the following witnesses: � sign: 41 . , •-- print name: / firi 41141RWININIIIVR sign: print n JOHN'S ISLAND WATER MANAGEMENT, INC. By: printed na • 11oe title: ✓'s,-}'" (President or Vice President) [remainder of page intentionally left blank] 2 ,A9) STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF INDIAN RIVER Ackn wledged b fore me this J3` ' day of ,ft,/ 1 , 2018, by '11740i103t�li�rr3 e the ✓`e.S e of John's Island Water Manage(nent, Inc., a Florida not for profit corporation, who executed on behalf of and with full authority of the corporation, and who is either personally known to me or has produced (driver's license or passport) as identification. SEAL: 3 NOTARY PUBLIC: sign: 4(.44/� print: ,l 1fur1l`e.. rit1 Commission No.:0 Commission Expiration: ar ° Notary Public State of Florida Mary Eunice Smith A*a My Commission FF 939672 OF or Expires 01/0612020 Indian River Mosquito Control District 5655 41st Street Vero Beach, Florida 32967 Phone: 772.562.2393 Fax: 772.562.9619 http://irmosquito.com irmcd@irmosquito2.org DOUGLAS CARLSON, Director February 18, 2019 Mr. Dylan Reingold Indian River County Attomey 1801 27th Street Vero Beach, FL 32960 Re: Proposed Johns Island reuse waterline under Hole -in -Wall Island Dear Mr. Reingold, FEB 2Z 20/9 DFjCt\15y„a This letter is to inform you and the Indian River County Board of County Commissioners that at our Feb. 12, 2019 Board meeting, the Board voted that they do not agree with your Feb. 11, 2019 e-mail message. In that message you wrote: "I believe that the County does have an ownership interest in the right of way over both Hole in the Wall Island and Pine Island." After reviewing various legal documents, our Board believes that the County does not possess any ownership interest in Hole in the Wall Island and that the alternate route using the CR510 causeway deserves serious consideration. Sincerely y s (Buck) Vocelle, Chai Cc: IRC Board of aunty Commissioners Ms. D. Pupa, FDEP Ms. J. Smith, FDEP 223 GUNSTER FLORIDA'S LAW FIRM FOR BUSINESS Pending Number: 00046792.00001 Writer's Direct Dial: (561) 650-0621 Writer's E -Mail Address: bseymour@gunster.com December 3, 2018 VIA E-MAIL dreingold(2 iircgov.com Indian River County Attorney's Office C/O Dylan Reingold 1801 27th Street Vero Beach, FL 32960-3365 Re: Hole in the Wall Island Right of Way Dear Mr. Reingold: Thank you for taking the time to discuss the issues associated with the right of way over Hole in the Wall Island, specifically relative to the ability to provide the opportunity to bring reclaimed water to John's Island. As you know, this is an environmentally sustainable project that has long been in the works. The last issue in making it happen is the provision of the reclaimed water pipe under Hole in the Wall Island. John's Island Water Management, Inc. ("JIWM") hoped to avoid the issue of ownership of right of way over Hole in the Wall Island by working with the Indian River Mosquito Control District ("District") to obtain an easement to provide for the reclaimed water pipe. Unfortunately, the District refused to provide the easement. Now that the District has failed to work with JIWM, we have gone back to review what rights Indian River County ("County") has relative to the Hole in the Wall Island. We have determined that the County owns a 70 -foot right of way over Hole in the Wall Island ("HITW ROW"). The County's ownership is evidenced in two separate title documents. The County's initial ownership of the HITW ROW, along with other rights of way, came in 1923. At that time, St. Lucie County as predecessor to the County claimed for public use a 70 - foot wide strip of land across Hole in the Wall Island, Pine Island, and upland portions across from Pine Island to the Atlantic Ocean. This is shown by three separate paragraphs in Minute Book 4, Page 77, with the HITW ROW identified in the first paragraph. A copy of the Minute Book page is attached for your consideration. Over time, this was developed and used for roadway purposes. As additional ownership interest, the County received a Warranty Deed from Fred and Adriana Tuerk. As you know, the Tuerk family had acquired significant lands in the County, Phillips Point 777 South Flagler Drive. Suite 500 East West Palm Beach, FL 33401 p 561-655-1980 f 561-655-5677 GUNSTER.COM Boca Raton 1 Fort Lauderdale 1 Jacksonville I Miami 1 Orlando 1 Palm Beach I Stuart 1 Tallahassee 224 Tampa 1 The Florida Keys 1 Vero Beach !West Palm Beach 1 Winter Park Johns Island Water Management Inc. December 3, 2018 Page 2 including Hole in the Wall Island. By the deed recorded at Official Records Book 86, Page 292, Tuerk conveyed to the County .a 70 foot strip over Hole in the Wall Island which was located 35 feet on either side of the centerline of what was referred to as Winter Beach Bridge Road. This is identified in the final paragraph of the described property in the deed, which is attached for your reference. We have not found that the County has ever abandoned its interest in the HITW ROW obtained in 1923 nor conveyed the ownership thereof that was received from the Tuerk family. We did find that the County abandoned interests in other property by way of a Resolution recorded at Official Records Book 87, Page 493. Specifically, the County abandoned the upland property after crossing Pine Island and to the Atlantic Ocean that was identified in the 1923 minute book; this was the third paragraph. Importantly, the 70 -foot strip over Hole in the Wall Island that is the HITW ROW was not identified in the Resolution. Based on our review of the above referenced documents, all of which are attached for your convenience, it appears that Indian River County maintains ownership over the right of way across Hole in the Wall Island. As the owner of that property, the County has the right to convey an easement for the placement of the reclaimed water pipe. We hope that this is helpful in your discussions. Please let us know if you have any questions. Sincerely, Cc: John's Island water Management Inc. (Via E-mail) Jim.Moller@jiproperties.com WPB_ACT1VE 9026152.1 GUNSTER, YOAKLEY. & STEWART, P.A. ATTORNEYS AT LAW 225 r ? , ST. LUCIE'CUUNTI CUMMIbluDilimo::.': ............„.. •,..,..t.a.BC/ORD,. JUNE 2, 1923 . PAGE No. 12 .4, 'PAE 77 . , td by law linder • --.1 7.• •i- ..- ' we ..t,illy .to ;4% • di soharged. • n Li -1-;::-N.,- I i -.......„2,, . • - -.- - J.o.wynn Birt ' Bell -1 . rsi Iri -.! ., , _, --J • , k :‘.-..r. ' • .. 1,--' • - • L,..) .. ..... • .. ...- law. dainmmq, • Road 00mmittee. ern It no protest. is flied with the Board, stele will be deeleree c public oounty rood rafter hiving given 'thirty days. notice of news. . Ito proiiiet hoeing boon tho. establishment of a iniblio ocunty road as • follows, suan is hereby declared a yellin eounty.rot.41 by this bourd: • • •teginning et a point oh the west shore of itole-in-the-wan island whioh Point is 199*.9 feet test ena. dOB feet north of ..the southwest ,e02ner 01 6410tiOrt iVIO (2) „Ivowneltip thirty two (32), southltengi tr:rty nine. (M) Boot, ran north ,60 degrees and 23 mimetes. • East 1790 feet to Us Piet share et Islands .# -s18obeginning Q t a "point on. the visit demo of Irina Isliond.'.whioh voliat is 4460.9 . _ OGt oast 229941 het xiortit oi the.:South west owner. of Ueotion l'Ino (2) aosinlehip txt t.o .(it) itOfl Fte thirtv nine: UMMato run.. north 8 do pees end BB minutia i • • . . . No et 690 feet totba i?,fist diore Of ' !• • ••• • - ' . • • itaso- 1)08i/irking at Q ioint on the Beet honk el the Litton whieh B&30. feet south and 264#1 feat wootei Intiratiotion ofthe ooet bank of the:Wien 42.vor' • .• • ; with the north line of i•ounnhip „Writ tiro (BE), South, Lenge thirtY YAM' 429) f4st, run ,. north 60.1egreee eird 26 alizeitei Out 46 feat, thence on eq.! degree mid 0 minute curve to • • . . . tt MB 2�it, 4bkoe 6th 18ilagroin and BO.'panutesEast .690 itesti•-•*44,t10112:1..-. .4. • Qt2 t*t Lobi 20 -$41 Thent4L2eat ana Para-. '• . ....__._ ...... • . •• - lei In t11!_$d3 . way of • atid toed to be . • peoteit ZO teet oieTe or less to the z&titratitie 006Q21* ...SA right ot .• ;. 70 teet. ed.cie. .f.:•:".:;:-•-•-• •,', -7.:;--•";'• •.1 -; :"':1: .....*:-.-1:•••,: "iI:z.., • -: .. • • - - - •• • :.• • \ow d againot the establishment Of a pubILO 'eas4tly.lo.e.d., • • • • 3 ... • . ••• 4. .• • • • io. oB 'esia zoo& !Wit* deoierea yablio • °aunty rot: a by this toor4.1.:3*. • • • . • ..- - • :•• • .. •r• .A .: B 0 0411 ing t ho ntereeo on of •the oentre lino of,. wastfat.."/Iort•Ateio? .V.I.tili the: :- - .:. ..• - Beath a Orptiii iit 11. late 'et-,the..;iit7 ei Vat 21'31'004' 13, ing . . . : . . • .: - - • , : -' ',." ••' 1..• :1'4 ' 2 " .::-:•'. ''', :•''... :--"'"•'. •:•4•:`'' ;;10,:- - -•,31/••• ''•••••••"':.. 1..... '? '••:11.1i:":1.!...... t.V.:c ...t. : 1 •:: , : i " •••• .. ... , • .11:: ::.11:?.. •/•••11.f.:, -..-.c: •:1.'.''' . '' .4...L.. ... .,... ,. . .. -..,ii sir, pi ee 3 . .. • . .4' .:. . : , • •.,,;1,...-•,,s-,124 •:i:;4.„kr..' • /11TV,At • ''''• .--.-.7. ' . . • ' •••••-• . •• • .1 ' - ' :: *. ..• ••_; '& ' - • ..: iitik•A Ten,:- ..1, . Ilit"..i' • . ' . ' ' ' • - •' . • :. • • : ' ' ' -- ,1": • •;:'.'.•%,. • "..''.' — ; ,•.•:;:.1•;.,Ilig.r:.; vi'•.''''.. .." ... . • , ., . 1. .-ii / ::. . — t...;.‘:,..1.,-3 ":-.... sl. “,,,ri:fi,ii:111:4411.1; • * +he men% line °fel) , .: • • . - .0*.e.p.,T, li•iiii/e)i II.j) I.NstiO .,.fot..1,4•1; • i;,..., ..) ,t.., •,..• • ..rp ! teep. ito :to .L, theme a 0tog. tusza,e.it. then0e 3 1 deg VI stiki .` • • ;.••=..4 , • . •*. • • . • . • .. • • • . . . • ' • • , • 226 10/3/2018 Landmark Web Official Records Search :— mg , t�. -. i3`:;c..., DI:. i lits. ';iahF*fa,.. .. _• 1. A,.t.•;:.•,.,:• aaauem w® -• saa•:ro Pref. n.ti. a...4.re' w., n. eC .' i'. .OFFICIAL 'RECORD • .. • • Mb infkatate, Blade this • 3rd_ '. day of November • ' ;A.D. 19 59. ° 8. Fred It: Tuerk and Adriena Titerk, hie wife, e/ the Coady' of Iadian River . and State of Florida .. - part les of the first part, and Indian River County. a political subdivision of the State , f whose mailing address is Indian -River County'Courthouse, yero,Beech, -• ( Fiori of Me County of Indian River - • and State of lrlprtha ' port y of the second part. lifitatsseth, that iKd said pall les o/ /lie first part. for and in consideration of the slim of Ten and no/100 Dollars. and other good and 'vahmbte cothtderattoua to them In hand paid. the receipt whereof Is hereby acknowl- edged. have granted, bargained. aotd and conveyed, and by there presents do grant.• by. gain. sell, convey and confirm onto the said party • 4 the second part audita sue eeriot and assigns forever. all that certain pared of land lying and being to Me County o/ Indian R Iver. and Stole of Florida - , more particularly described as follouss • a•, A right of way for a public road over. on and across the North 70 feet of that part of the South 11.5 acres of Government Lot 10. Seaton 36. Township 31'South. Range 39 East, which Ilea East of State Road A1A according to the right of way map of Section 8807-102. as filed in the office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Indian River County. Florida. • This right of way is conveyed for a public road and 1f ever -the same is used for a public beach, then it shall be a public beach for • the citizens of the Winter Beach area of Indian River County; ALSO, . • •i A right of way for a public road 70 feet In width, the same being 35 feet on either side of a centerline described as follows; From"the gate across the old cotinry road, said gate lying 35 feet South and 15 feet West of the Southeast corner of Government Lot 1, Section 1. Township 32 South. Range 39 Easi. rut North 9 degrees 11 minutes East a distance of 70.62 feet to the centerline of old State Road A1A, the same being the point of beginning; thence run 219.34 feet along thea rc of a curve concave oo the North. said curve having a radius of 991.12 - feet to the P.C.; thence North 67 degrees 15 minutes 30 seconds East a distance of 1290 feet to Station 306 -1- 28.72 on the centerline of State Road A1A, according to the right of way map of Section 8807-102, as filed in the office of the -Clerk of the Circuit Court of Indian River CoUncy. Florida; ALSO, •• A right of way for a public road 70 feet in width, the same being 35 feet on elth_r side of the centerline as the 'same has now and heretofore existed across Hole in - the Walt Island and across Pine Island (Orchid island) in the Indian River, the same being known as the Winter Beach Bridge Road. _ - • Togeiht with all the tenements. hereditament, and appurtenanrn, with every privilegge. right. flits. Inlne,t and estate. dower and right of dower. o�w�Yt er.. reversion, remainder and easement thereto 1 helonging or In anywise appretaining.lime s yO Iand to NM Ihr same h. fee simple forever. • And the add 'met les of the first part do covenant with the sold part y of the second pori that they are lawfully seated of the raid premises, Mat they are free from nit rneanebrances and that they have Sowf rt hr and law. Int sad urisy to sett the same. and the said part les of the first twN da hereby/ally warrant the title to ,all land. and will defend she tam,. against the lour/at claims nJ ail prisons tehamaort er. in ttnsss 1Vhertof, the said part lea o/ the first part ha VC hereunto set their hands and seal a the day and year above written. Signed. sealed and delivered In our presences kna T��'.....- 0 • 227 http://ori.indian•river.org/search/index?theme=.blue§ion=searchCriteriaBookPage&quickSearchSelection=# 1/1 • :"I: 't „It • 4�• �' .i f �! •., d�,rd�9 4�V. u r. 1 i41{%' } � `L-475,1‘, � •;•.1;ul Y� 6C'Fi {y 'N Cd(j; N iti•$: ;:e • i j 40%. ! ti--CC����� Mi n ,� .•,•�`:f ijj•.h43a'i✓- �'.r•1a'\I-'71. •••s�'iti;�iZr.ti•'?t. .°101162 °1 11' ae(ts-viii E� '�a 44ii'I :g t ri— i n".ilSR .t , • L1C '-"I (. �,.: �� . � r .: r Lifej!r•,, rf ':��i?tt .Fa .0 �r (.i aC :::! '. ,u.:c�l'!a�Jt•n7vli:t'd xi at t. F 1iiS ^4 Y Y '{r' r� u a { i i3 7 ii..m.•i 4 I; "r#tI.ISW ,��4, Rr.�t 1 .��;IEI.:''a'r.".i����1�'� �'rLii5 „;+'ICk;iC't�r-n.C:^ �a.�,'%;�. iii ., '+1<. '�iatr.',r��C�; ., FEW 0 • Telephone: (561) 567-8000 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS 1840 25th Street, Vero Beach, Florida 32960-3365 OFFICE OF October 10, 2001 COUNTYATTORNEY Paul G. Bangel* County Attorney William G. Collins II* Deputy County Attorney Michael C. Zito Assistant County Attorney *Board Certified by the Florida Bar Board of Legal Specialization and Education in City; County & Local Government Law Telephone: Extension 1424 Suncom: 224-1424 Fax: (561) 569-4317 e-mail: ircattorney@bcc.co. indian-river.fl.us Emest A. Cox, III, Esq. Gunster, Yoakley & Steward, P.A. 777 S. Flagler Drive Philips Point East Tower, Suite 500 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Facsimile 561-655-5677 Re: Old Winter Beach Road Dear Mr. Cox: Consistent with previous correspondence, a copy of which is attached, I take this opportunity to reiterate this Office's position that an Indian River County right -of --way (Old Winter Beach Road) extends across the width of Hole in the Wall Island as well as across the southern tip of Pine Island. St Johns River Water Management District Permit Number 4 -061 -0164 -ERP, regarding Hole in the Wall Island, states: "Permit issuance does not relieve you from the responsibility of obtaining permits from any federal, state and/or local agencies asserting concurrent jurisdiction for this work." The Indian River County Board of County Commissioners Resolution dated December 1, 1959, did not serve to vacate the entire subject right-of-way. Rather, Section 1.D. served to vacate only that portion of the seventy foot right-of-way Tying east of Government Lots 1 and 2. (That part Tying within Government Lots 1 and 2 in Section 1, Township 32 South, Range 39 East, was excepted from the vacation, and, the remainder of Old Winter Beach Road was not described in the vacation.) Section 1.F. of the resolution did not apply to the subject right- of-way because, having been addressed in Section 1.D., Old Winter Beach Road was not among the "other public County roads situated within the limits of the Town of Indian River Shores" being vacated. 232 Ernest A. Cox, Ill, Esq. Gunster, Yoakley & Steward, P.A. Page two October 10, 2001 If you would like to discuss this matter please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, Paul G. angel County Attorney Enclosure: Letter dated August 23, 1999, from Charles P. Vitunac cc: Board of County Commissioners James E. Chandler, County Administrator Robert M. Keating, AICP, Community Development Director 233 Telephone: (561) 567-8000 OFFICE OF COUNTY ATTORNEY Charles P. Vitunac County Attorney William G. Collins II Deputy County Attorney Terrence P. O'Brien Assistant County Attorney Telephone: Ext. 424 Suncom: 224-1424 FAX: (561) 770-5095 e-mail: cvitunac�a 'ndian- river.lib flus BOA ) OF COUNTY COMMISS11 ER, 184-0 -25th-Street, Vero Beach, Florida 3260 9 August 23, 1999 Horse's Head, Ltd. One John's Island Drive Vero Beach, Florida 32963 Re: Application #4 -061 -164A -ERP Horse's Head, Ltd. Gentlemen: It is our understanding that the St. John's River Water Management District granted the above application with a condition that the road bed bisecting Hole -in -the -Wall Island be breached to allow the free flow of water across the island. This letter restates .the County's position that this 70' right-of-way on the island is County property as a result of action by the St. Lucie County Commission on June 2, 1923, Book 4, Page 77 of the Official records of St. Lucie County. The County has never relinquished any rights in this 70' right-of-way, which was for a number of years an active road known as State Road 508. It appears that your claim to title to this right-of-way is based on Resolution 108986 of the Board of County Commissioners dated December 1, 1959. This resolution purports to abandon "all other County Roads" Within the limits of the Town of Indian River Shores. At the time of this resolution, the road in question was designated State Road 508. There is no record of that designation being removed; therefore, the resolution did not pertain to this property. The fact that County land lies unused for many years does not create an abandonment under Florida law. In view of the foregoing, you are advised that any breach of this road bed and any incursion into the 70' County right-of-way will be viewed as a trespass by the County. Please govern yourself accordingly. Very truly yours, Charles P. Vitunac County Attorney TPO/sw 234 ... ....... ..a.ul W'1r4-14.1C t7L .<5:• p'19do GUNSTER, YOAKLEY, VALDES-FAULT & STEWART, P.A. ATTORNEYS AT LAw WA. FACSIMILE & U.S. MAIL May 4, 1999 M. J. Angelo Assistant General Counsel St. Johns River Water Management District P.O. Box 1429 Palatka, FL 32178 JOHNS R:vcg vyrrg :i { : Oli} ;i•( MAY 1 0 1999 • -0(01-011AMA -e Re: Wieler and Town of Indian River Shores v. Horse's Head, Ltd. and St. Johns River Water Management District Dear Mary Jane: In his April 15, 1999 correspondence, Kenneth R. Macht, Chairman of the Indian River County Board of County Commissioners, essentially asserts that the County owns the right-of-way proposed for mitigation purposes 'on Hole -in -the -Wall Island by virtue of an.actiort takerrby the St. Lucie County Commission on June 2, 1923. Simply put, Mr. Macht is mistaken. Leaving aside for the moment the obvious fact that this same right-of-way has been abandoned by the County by virtue of some 40 years or more of non-use, the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida adopted a resolution on or about December 16, 1959, a copy of which is attached hereto, stating in relevant part 1. That this Board has heretofore determined upon its own motion by resolution duly adopted to vacate, abandon, discontinue, close and renounce and disclaim any right of said County and the public in and to any land in connection with certain public roads and parts thereof described as follows: F. Any and all other public Countv roads situated withinthe limits of the Town of Indian River Shores. except. however, the following.. . (emphasis supplied] The resolution then goes on to except from the coverage of this paragraph certain roads or parts thereof lying, elsewhere in the Town of Indian River Shores but clearly and unmistakably Doi excepting from the ambit of this paragraph the road/right-of-way on Hole -in -the -Wall Island (which is located within the territorial limits of the Town). In other words, by clear and unequivocal official action in 1959, the Indian River County Board of County Commissioners took the very action that Mr. Macht in his correspondence claims has never been done, i.e., the abandonment of the right -of - 215 South Monroe Street. Suite 830 • Tallahassee. FL. 32301 (904) 222-6660 Fax: (904) 2224002 e-mail: clientzerviccoltunsteccom FORT LAUDERDALE • MiAMI • PALM OEACH • STUART • TAI,LAHA55Et; • vFAO af•ACJ1 • WEST PALM, BEACH X1110,3e. 235 • M. I. Angelo May 4, 1999 Page 2 rs.J. VC" WM I CM way by the County. Mr. Macht should do his homework better. F'AGE 03 I hope and trust that this resolves this late.blootrdng and spurious claim. Of course. if you have any other questions, please do not hesitate to give me a call. Very truly yours, c,3'Qlsx;suev._kl-tc61%.__ William L. Hyde WLH:nl Mark Gronceski Ernest A. Cox, 111, Esquire Charles M. Bayer, Jr. Steve Melchiori 236 ' 05/04/99 TUE 11:47 FAX se 11 1599 7 1 JUMM MIVtK WA 1 ti{ PAGE 04 J. I. REALBSTATE O O z BE rT RESOLVED ty the Beard of Indust 13lver Cotatty, Florida, thai slats Board dues herewith* fled and deicers hitt as follows; t. That this Bond has herosofore determined U$itat 1 volution duly adopted as vacate, sbendoo, d =ounce and disclaim any right of said County nod the In eannectlea with cicala public reads std para thereof described VI A. 'Thant punkas of the 330 -toot dedleades now geed for S`eace Road No. ARA as stows Retain NO. 2 of Soathero Shares Subdivision, Attending b plat thereof recorded in Pbt 6'* 2, page 64, of the public record* of Indian Riva Conary, Florida. lying more testa sixty (60) feet of (rein the Baseline of Survey as shows eat the fight y asap of Section 8407-102. Stade Road AIA. Wed in the office of do Clerk of the Ctre2dt Court for [edtan River Gouaty, Florida. EXCEPTING therefrom area 'leaded kw 23 -bot radial returns at Be duseather Lasa D. .A Il that pet of the eight of way of former State Road MA encoding froth the North line of Suver Stores Subdivision, {lain Nos. 1 and 2. awarding es plata thereof recorded in the office of the Clert *1 the Circuit Court of Indian River County. Florida, le Plat Boot 4. pages 45 and 69, respecttvoly, to the South 1Ion of the Tomtit indite R her Stares, ea the same *soar exists. that Iles outside the limbs bd State Road I4o. klA. accordhsg to the Ante of way map of Section 1807-102. State Bose AIA. as Riad Ip Ciao • *face of the Gut of the Ctraitt Court of Indian River . Conary, Florida. C. Ali that put of the public County toad as dealg- eated In Minute *toot 3. pogo 392, of the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucre Canny, ny, Ploclda, commonly trout, as thalami !sued Road. haat Iles' sitttsin the Undo of the Town of Indian lover Shores, which said road is described as follows: lkgimting at the South eared of the Orddd and Narrows Road sunning Southeast 392 feet to the dfrlsios, lino • between the McD esld and Pannell I. thence Ralf MSS feet to the Southeast corner of the McDonald land, teen due South bemoan the Mandl and taker hated m the andira Rhrcr 1505 feet corner withl.l.P. H.vut1e05, utas along river to D. H. Mathis Abtthweat corner. then along lndtae Alter to Southwest corner of Govern- ment Lot Me. 5. section 36. township 31 South. Range 237 `• uS/04/99 TUE 11:48 FAISe )1 1599 OFFICIAL REcuHR Wu* 81.494 t JUI't`A K1Yt( WA t tt< J.I. REALESTATE CO. 39 East, to s cabbage tree to keine the Ed. Walker- • house. thence South 45 degrees East ee the South corner • Of Lot 8. Section 13. Tawoship 32 South, Rango 40 East. then one-half mile South on ani( saaivn the , thea East 900 feet, thea to degrees Eau of South to Public School tbuse, then Utile directive to a pdint 350 feet North of the Chamberlain house, ciente East to Atiande Geese. thence along batch 4375 fret to Pabn Avenue, thea Wast on Palet Avenue 3450 feet M Indian River Drive, thea South on todtan River Drive 430 tett ea Live Oats A1re0Ue. then 1000 feet Swath on Lantana Avenue, thee West to Bridge. Sa td t a4 to be 30 feet tit. AU that part of the County public stead as described Mutate Book 4, page 77, of the Eased of C,oenty Cana - All a a- y - tstaatoners of St. Lnete Com, Florida, described as tr �� follows: 4,0 Beginning at a point ea the Batt baste et Wien River syt oaf 1 which Is 2230.3 teat South sad 254.1 feet West of the tgas intersection, of the Eau bank of ledlan River with the North line o1 Township 32 South. Range 39 East, rue Atotth 60 degrees and 20 minute* East 45 feet, thence h 'on a 12 degree and 0 atbtvva curve to the lett 348 tent. V thence Noah 18 degrees and 30 minutes East 690 feet, conte or less, to apoiat which is 1320 (tet South of the aforesaid Toitdship line. Thence East and parallel to the said Township tate 4230 feet, Mon or lege, in the Adandc Ocean. The right of way of said road to be 70 feet wide; • • however, that pan thereof which lies in Rerainent,��} a. To�eae $2 ;,�_ s�aro S9 -mat• . E. AU that pats of the right of way of termor State • Solid MA extending trout -fife South unfits of the Zbwa of Indian River Shores to the North lbaits of the Down. • of14dlaa Riva Shores iytngouteide the limits of State Road AIA, according to the sight of way map of Section • 3807.102, Stara Road illA, as tile4 to etre office of the Cleat et the Clra de Caere el iadtie River Gouatyr. - Fbri EXCEPT, however, that pin thereof described • as follows: • Any. ane all parts thereof 'king in Government Lets 1, end 2, Sectlsa S. Township 32 Scutt,. °.Range 39 East, • sod 'except any parts thereof lying North 61 sats eecdoe. F. Airy see all otter puhtle County toads situated within the penins of the Town of tedlse River Shores. EXCEPT. however, the tollowtog: . • (1) That part thereat which Use in Government Lots 1 and 2 to Secdoa 1, Township 32 South. Range 39 East. (2)Amy and all pats of brinier State Road ALA lying la Governing= Loa 1 and 2. Section 1, Town- ship 32 -South, Rine 39 Cast, and except aayparts• thereof tying North of sad sestsaa, • - 2 - • Sec .2 32 s - 3 e • PAGE 05 X003 238 03/84/88 TUE 11:48 FAX sr'"" 131 1588 r • . • 1•- >. ;, r •. a i J.I. REAIESTATE CO.:` - OFFICIAL RECORD. *oma 87 714.495 (31 Pram the ;tate across the old County road, acid gate Lying 33 feet South and 15 tort Vest of the Southeast corner of Government Lot 1, Section 1, Township 32 South. Raagr 39 East: run North 4 degrees 11 minutes East a distance zaf 70,62 feet ist the centerline of old State Road AIA, rho same bei the point of beginning: thence run 219.34 foot along the arc of h► cure ooncsve to the North. mid cum Sieg a radios of 991.12 fact to the F.C.; theme ?Taint 67 degrees 1S tninut:as 30 moods East a drat:met of 1140 feet to Station 306 4. 28.7 on the centerline of State Rous ALA According eo tba right of way meg of Section 4807- 102, as Mod in the office of Lha Clark of the Circuit Courtof•Lndias livor County. Florida. (4) 'Me North 70 feet of hat pail of the South 11.5 acres ooid overumo4t Lot 10, Station 36 - sblp.3( South, Range 39 East, that Iles Past of State Road AIA, aoosrding ' the right of way map of Section 8801.102. Ailed the same saw beita to Indian River County. Florida. • 2. That this Bond has published nocicb thereof ono time in tho Vero beach Frans jour ai,:+ newspaper of geaeral ciecolatioo in Indian River Ceaanty, Florida, said publitatksn being published at least two (2) weeks prior as the date stared therein far, stash public heartsg, as will more daily appear .by proof of publication 'flied in Mc records of airs Board. • 3. That each of the sbpvs described public roads k ,act a state or federal highway. - • 4. That i ptiblte hearlag thereon. hag *ea geld byli;?he Baar+d.af C000ty Contottsaloears of Indian -River Con4y, Florida, in the (Mee of said Board In the Iodise River County Courthouse, Vero Beaelt, Florida, on . • • Ceder i, 1959, at 1i1f00 o'clock A.M.;. and, BB fT FURTHER RESOLVED that tits Board does herewith vacate. abandon, discontinue. dose. rcrouncc and disclaim any right of the County and the public in sed to any Isad in connection with the enticing otic roads .berehabefore described. wow c.w.o... 1 ow.. s,,,•..,...... -- •__ _._. _ .. • r►•ivc Ub e004 • .. . 239 n1 FRI 14:29 FAX 581 655 5677 GUNSTER YOAKLEY ATTORNEYS AT LAW VIA FACSIMILE (561) 569-4317 and U.S. MAIL Paul G. Bangel, Esq. County Attorney INDIAN RIVER COUNTY 1840 25th Street Vero Beach, FL 32960-3365 GUNSTER SN52173403 Om rn2NUMBER: 19713.1 WRrr°St`s['MOT DIAL NUMUR: (561) 650-0593 W erra•s E-MAIL ADDRESS: ecox@gunster.com November 9, 2001 Re: OLD WINTER BEACH ROAD Dear Mr. Bangei: This letter follows up on your letter to me dated November 2, 2001 regarding Old Winter Beach Road. As you and I discussed briefly many months ago, the County's understanding as to its alleged right-of-way on Hole in the Wall Island is incorrect. This issue was raised a number of years ago by the County in the context ofthe St. Johns River Water Management District permitting ofthe Horse's Head project and was addressed at that time. The conclusion was that any interest that the County may have once had to a right-of-way for public road purposes across Hole in the Wall Island was abandoned by the County many years ago, as is recorded in the public records, and there is no public road on Hole in the Wall Island. As the County has no right-of-way over Hole in the Wall Island, County right-of-way permits under Chapter 312 of the County Code are not required. if you have any questions or would like to discuss this further, please contact me at your convenience. Sincerely, Ernest A. Cox EAC/dtw/613902.1 Gunstcr, Moakley & Stewart, P.A. Phillips Poim 777 South Flagler Drive, Suitt 500 East • West Palm Beach, til- 33401.6194 (561) 655.1980 Fax: (561) 655-5677 e-mail: elientservices@gunster.com • www.guaatcr.00rn PORT LAUDERDALE • M1AMI • PALM eEAUI • sruARr • TALLANARPEE • VERO UPACM • WEST PAU.4 0EAO• [002 240 Held -10/-;3y 13c'*( Y KUM: H1'LHflt11L VVPA= 2# L. 1 u O 1 A'Oa i]1=:0O tit,n 1./ ATLANTIC COASTAL TITLE CORPORATION 3850 20th Street Suite 6, Vero Beach, Florida 32960 Telephone: (407) 569-4364 INVOICE To: Indian River County Attorney 1840 25th Street Vero Beach, Florida 32960 Date Report Typed: April 7,1999 ACTC Report Number. 99034302 ;`- Customer's Reference: Hole in the WaU Island Current Fee: Horse's Head, Ltd., a Florida limited partners Search Fee (Chain of Title Report) Copy Cost Total Amount Due 150.00 7.00 157.00 ThLS is an invoice for services, and !s DUE UPON RECEIPT. The Company does not allow any abatement or forgiveness of charges in the event of cancellation if ooiiec t on efforts become necessary, the Company shall be entitled to reasonable ettCmey's fees and Costs. The Company's liability for daims upon this product shall be reduced by the amount of any outstanding invoices owed to the' Company by the customer. Reliance upon the product to which tli invoice is att*ched shall constitute acceptance by the customer of the terms hereof.' 241 APR -07 -Ss 13.46 FRoM.A'r'LAN'r'1L 1LM1STAL ;Q » 1 L=.`1.0 1 00 000001 ACTC File No: 99034302 Customer Ref: Hole in the Wall Island This report is issued to: Indian River County Attorney 1840 25th Street Vero Beach, Florida 32960 This is to certify that the Company did cause to be conducted o search of the Public Records of the county in which the herein described land is located; as to the lands hereinafter described; for the purpose of disclosing the chain of ownership for the period identified. Mortgage or lien encumbrances have been ignored, and no search has been made to determine the status of real property taxes or special assessments that might affect the land_ No representation is made hereby as to the insurability or marketability of title or the legal sufficiency of any instrument reported herein. 1. The lands that are the subject of this report are described as follows: Being more particularly described in Deed recorded itt Official Records Book 1193, at Page 1897, of the Public Records of Indian River County, Florida, a copy of which is incorporated herein be reference. 2. A search of the Public Record was conducted beginning on October 5,1935 at 8:00 AM and continued through 5:00 PM on the certification date given below; and it was found that title to the land hereinabove descnbed was apparently vested In: Horse's Head, Ltd., a Florida limited partnership 3. The "chain of title" to said lands, and the matters reported herein, are as follows: As to the North 112 of Hole in the Wall Island: ed in favor of Fred R. Tuerk, recorded in Q. R_Bc �1 ;at Page;= ENV (99034302) Printed April 7,1999 - Page 2 242 RPR -07-99 13,49 FROM.RTLANT14.: VUHbiMJ. 1 u+ o o a o ca. .... (b) Option Agreement between Adriana K. Martin, George Reynolds Tuerk and Conrad Tuerk, as Co -Executors of the Last Will and Testament of Fred R. Tuerk, deceased; Herbert J. Knudten and Sophia Knudten, his wife; Adriana K. Martin and George R. Tuerk, as Trustees of the George E. O. Tuerk Trust; Conrad Tuerk, as Trustee of the Elizabeth C. Tuerk Trust, and Elizabeth C. Tuerk, a single person "Optioners," and Lost Tree Village Corporation, a Florida corporation "Optlonee", recorded on March 3, 1969, in O. R. Book 309, at Page 2. (c) Deed in favor of Florida First National Bank at Vero Beach, recorded on March 27,1970, in 0. R. Book 345, at Page 393. (d) Deed in favor of Lost Tree Village Corporation, a Florida corporation, dated August 12,1974, and recorded in O. R. Book 474, at Page 294, (e) Deed in favor of Horse's Head, Ltd, a Florida limited partnership, recorded on December 31, 1997, in O. R. Book 1186, at Page 2301; and re-recorded on February 17, 1998, in 0. R. Book 1193, at Page 1897. As to the South 112 of Hole in the Wall Island: in favor of Indian River Islands Corporation, recorded on ober 5,1935, in Deed Bo• 25, at.Page 2 (b) Deed in favor of Elizabeth Hansen, recorded on May 26, 1950, in Deed Book 59, at Page 291. (c) Deed in favor of Fred R. Tuerk, dated September 1, 1956; and Imo , recorded in Deed Book 113, at Page 348. (d) Deed in favor of Horse's Head, Ltd, a Florida limited partnership, �: recorded on December 31, 1997, in O. R. Book 1186, at Page 2301; and tt �� re-recorded on February 17, 1998, in O. R. Book 1193, at Page 1897. INFORMATIONAL NOTE: Reservation of Public County Road, as reserved and according to instrument recorded in County Commissioners Minutes Book 4, at Page 77, of the Public Records of St Lucie County, Florida. No other matters were dlscovereci during the period searched that appear to affect the "chain of title" as herelnabove resited, or use of the land. ENV (99034302) Printed April 7, 1999 - Page 3 243 APR -07-99 1349 FROM,ATLADITIQ CUA5Te.L 11.21b1:3UWWtV Irektart.. 4/4 Certified to Indian River County Attorney as of hflarch 9, 1999 (the "Effective Date"). ATLANTIC COASTAL TITLE CORPORATION ACTC File No: 99034302 Customer Ref: Hole in the Wall Island ENV ( 034302) Printed April 7, 1999 - Page 4 Aarlawlia767701,i 244 RD4A - RECORDING DEPARTMENT -- DATE 4/07/99 RR4A ' DOCUMENT SEARCH TIME 14:48:11 .... Doc# 1035507 Date 12/31/97 Time 2:32 Book 1186 Page 2301 . s Fees - Rcdng-$ 42.00 State-$ 700.00 Intang-$ .00 Type WARRANTY DEED Brief Desc M/B IN/NEAR 1/2/11/13-32-39 ETC & JOHN'S ISLAND PL ATS 29 47 34 M/B IN/NEAR ETC, SEE INSTRUMENT LOT SUBDIVISION BLK SE TW RG WEEK TIMESHARE UNIT 01 32 39 APT CONDOMINIUM UNIT Dir LOST TREE VILLAGE CORPORATION Inv HORSE'S HEAD LTD Return-Instr CALL To PREMIER TITLE COMPANY INC CMD 1 to return to Main Menu CMD 2 FOR PARCEL NBRS. 245 Alan kuer Morito antro/ grict LOUIS "BUCK" VOCELLE, CHAIR TOM LOWTHER, VICE -CHAIR JANICE BRODA, SECRETARY/TREASURER DOUGLAS CARLSON, DIRECTOR 5655 41st STREET VERO BEACH, FLORIDA 32967 PHONE: (772) 562-2393 * FAX: (772) 562-9619 http://irmosquito.com * irmcd@irmosquito2.org April 16, 2019 TO: INDIAN RIVER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS This letter is to express the Indian River Mosquito Control District's (IRMCD) concern, as announced by County Attorney Dylan Reingold, that at the upcoming April 23, 2019 meeting of the Indian River County Board of Commissioners (BOCC), two items relating to the proposed Johns Island Reuse Waterline will be considered. He announced that a discussion of the Schulke, Bittle study which investigates an alternate pathway for the pipe will occur, followed by BOCC consideration to provide to Johns Island a temporary construction easement across Hole - in -Wall Island. The authority to make such an award is based on Mr. Reingold's opinion that IRC owns a 70 ft. swath across the center of the island under which the pipeline is proposed to be placed. While IRMCD is pleased that a study into an alternate route is underway, based on our understanding of an approx. 6 -month timeframe to carry out such a study, an April 23 discussion is premature. This is especially the case given that the proposed release date for the report will occur less than one week before the scheduled April 23, 2019 BCC meeting. That analysis and public discussion needs to be completed. before the second item is considered, that being the proposed granting by IRC to Johns Island of a temporary construction easement. Based on these points, we request that a BOCC discussion be postponed until at least thirty days after it has been completed and circulated for public consumption. Additionally, IRMCD does not recognize that IRC has any ownership interest in Hole -in -Wall Island. Based on IRMCD's review of pertinent documents, including a memorandum dated May 7, 2001 authored by former County Attorney William G. Collins, II, we conclude that IRMCD owns the entire island in fee -simple title. Two former attorneys with the Gunster Yoaldey law firm reached a similar conclusion. Thus, the BOCC has no legal authority to grant to John's Island a temporary construction easement across Hole -in -Wall Island. Should the BOCC vote to grant such a construction easement on April 23, 2019, the IRMCD will be forced to consider any and all options including legal action in the form of a complaint for an emergency temporary injunction and declaratory relief. Thank you for your attention to the above. Since Louis "Buck" Vocelle, Jr Chair - Indian River osquito Control District 246 Oce of INDIAN RIVER COUNTY ATTORNEY Paul G. Bangel, County Attorney* William G. Collins II, Deputy County Attorney* *Board Certified, City, County and Local Government Law MEMORANDUM TO: Commissioner Ruth Stanbridge FROM: William G. Collins II — Deputy County Attorney DATE: May 7, 2001 SUBJECT: Ownership of Old North Winter Beach Road on Hole in the Wall Island William L. Hyde, Esq. in a letter to Mary Jane Angelo, the Assistant General Counsel of the St. John's River Water Management District on May 4, 1999 claimed title for Horse Head Ltd. to the old road bed for Old North Winter Beach Road as it traversed Hole in the Wall Island by virtue of a Resolution adopted by the Board of County Commissioners on December 1, 1959 which vacated, abandoned and discontinued, closed and renounced any right of the County and the public to certain public roads including: "F. Any and all other public county roads situated within the limits of the Town of Indian River Shores, except, however, the following ..." Certain exceptions that don't concern the island were then listed. A County claim to title to the road bed would be possible if: 1. Hole in the Wall Island was not within the corporate limits of the Town of Indian River Shores on December 1, 1959; or 2. The road was not a County road at the time the Resolution was adopted, but rather was part of the state road system. 1840 256 Street, Vero Beach, Florida 32960 (561) 567-8000, Extension 1424 • Facsimile (561) 569-4317 ircattorney@bcc.co.indian-iiver.fl.us 247 As to the first, Jeff Maasch from the Property Appraiser's Mapping Unit researched his records and provided a map which indicated that Hole in the Wall Island was a part of the Town of Indian River Shores as of June 29, 1957 by virtue of Chapter 57-1415, Laws of Florida. As to the second, Public Works Director Jim Davis indicated that most of the roads on the state secondary system were transferred to the County in the late '70s. We then consulted a list of the state primary and state secondary road systems adopted June 20, 1956. At that time, included on the state primary road system was State Road A -1-A and State Road 5, also known as U.S. 1, as well as State Road 60. Also included was the State Road 502 which appears to be Beachland Boulevard from State Road 60 east to A -1-A. The state secondary road system which was transferred to County control and jurisdiction in the late 70's included S-510 from State Road 512 to the south and east; S-611 from the St. Lucie County line to State Road 60 at Vero Beach; S- 505 from State Road 60 north to State Road 510; S-512 from State Road 60 to State Road 512 southwest of Fellsmere; S -505-A from Oslo Road north to the Relief Canal; and S-630 from State Road S-505 to State Road 5 at Vero Beach (South Gifford Road). CONCLUSION: Because Hole in the Wall Island was within the corporate limits of the Town of Indian River Shores on December 1, 1959, and North Winter Beach was not part of the state road system, the road right-of-way for North Winter Beach Road through Hole in the Wall Island would have effectively been vacated by the County's 1959 resolution. (As an aside, the application with St. John's states in part that "the applicant has an agreement with FP&L, acceptable to district legal staff, allowing the removal of the dike and the placement of the FP&L feeder line under ground." An exhibit to the application with a revision date of 2/2/99 shows a 25 -foot FP&L easement running through the former road bed with a 40 -foot by 40 -foot FP&L easement at the east and west termini of the road on Hole in the Wall Island.) WGC/nhm cc: Paul G. Bangel — County Attorney 2 248 Lost Tree Village Corporation April 16, 2019 Bob Solari, Chairman Board of County Commissioners Indian River County, FL bsolari@ircgov.com Subject: Hole in the Wall Island Dear Chairman Solari: There has been recent debate about the proposal to run a pipeline under the Indian River Lagoon for irrigation of communities on the barrier island. While the Indian River County Commission awaits the results of an engineering feasibility report regarding the proposed pipeline, we wanted to provide additional information and background. In 2001, Lost Tree Village Corporation put an island known as Hole in the Wall into conservation. At about 130 acres, it is one of the largest islands in the center of the Indian River Lagoon between the Wabasso Causeway and the Merrill Barber Bridge. Hole in the Wall Island had been negatively impacted by mosquito control activities and the wetlands were in need of restoration. As part of the conservation strategy, invasive exotics such as Brazilian Peppers and Australian Pines were removed, mangroves were planted around the perimeter shoreline, and culverts with risers were installed to help restore the wetlands. In 2004, hurricanes wiped out some of the shoreline vegetation causing erosion and impacting habitat value. Lost Tree repaired the damage and replanted the shoreline. In 2009, after the restoration was completed, Lost Tree deeded Hole in the Wall Island to the Indian River Mosquito Control District so they could better manage and conduct mosquito control activities on the Island. A Rotational Impoundment Management Pian was implemented whereby the island is flooded periodically to kill salt marsh mosquitoes. Lost Tree needed someone to own the property, ensure it was maintained and still allow for the Mosquito Control District to fulfill their primary government function of mosquito control. Other conservation properties such as the Lost Tree islands, the Scrub Jay property on Route 510 and others were deeded to the County, the Town of Indian River Shores, the City of Vero Beach, the State of Florida, Johns Island Property Owners Association or the St. Johns River Water Management District. Lost Tree granted a conservation easement to the St. John's River Water Management District for Hole in the Wall and then deeded it to Mosquito Control so they could continue to manage it for mosquito control purposes and preservation. LTVC lath thud LOST TREE PRESERVE 11300 U.S. Highway One, Suite 100, Palm Beach Gardens, FL 33408 Office: (561) 626-9711 Fax: (561) 626-9641 Lost Tree Village Corporation Lost Tree is always seeking partnerships that will preserve our properties for the public, be good stewards of the land and maintain them in perpetuity. Over the years, Lost Tree has worked closely with Mosquito Control giving them access to our properties and we look forward to continuing and enhancing that working relationship as we restore other mosquito impoundment areas to improve habitats, fisheries, water quality and mosquito control. With respect to Hole in the Wall Island, it was never our intention that ownership of the island could be used as a means to block Indian River County from providing irrigation water to the main barrier island residents. Using reuse water for irrigation has been a part of Indian River Lagoon Restoration plans for many years and is a better alternative than wells or drinking water. As stated on the St. Johns River Water Management District website, "By using reclaimed water, communities can conserve traditional freshwater supplies and provide an environmentally responsible alternative to disposal of wastewater." Improving and maintaining the health of the Indian River Lagoon is a part of the environmental legacy of Lost Tree Village and Johns Island and all of our former and current land holdings between the Environmental Learning Center on the North to Fritz Island and the Marina on the South. We are all concerned about the health of the River and reuse water is a positive conservation tool that benefits the environment. Rather than using drinking water for irrigation or disposing treated wastewater (wasting it) through spray fields or injection into the ground, using reuse water for irrigation is more sustainable. The sale of reuse water also subsidizes sewer rates for the entire county and will help with the continued conversion of septic tanks to sewer system along the lagoon. It also provides a cost-effective alternative to shallow point wells for irrigation. Regarding the risk of the pipeline breaking and treated water escaping, in the unlikely event of that occurring, pressure gauges will automatically signal and shut valves on either end before any water escapes. Safeguards must be in place to protect the lagoon from any negative impacts and this should be included in the permits for the project. We believe that reuse water for irrigation, along with removing septic tanks and restoration efforts that improve habitat and water quality, are all part of a comprehensive strategy. Any increase in the cost of providing reuse water will only encourage local point wells or the use of drinking water for irrigation. We support the County's efforts to improve the reuse distribution system including the pipeline under Hole in the Wall Island. If the goal is to have a healthy, beautiful ecosystem in the county, using the reuse water is the environmentally responsible thing to do. Sincerely, ae.e.4.A( Chuck Bayer President of Lost Tree Village Corporation cc: Board of County Commissioners Mosquito Control Board Doug Carlson Mike Korpar (all via email) 11300 U.S. Highway One, Suite 100, Palm Beach Gardens, FL 33408 Office: (561) 626-9711 Fax: (561) 626-9641 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY COMMISSION MEETING: 23 APRIL 2019 COMMENT FROM: R. GRANT GILMORE, JR., PH.D. RE: Johns Island Reuse Water Supply Extension Project I am making this comment based on information I received from chemists (ORCA chemists) that have studied the waste water effluent from the Indian River County Central treatment plant after treatment and also studied the Indian River Lagoon between the Wabasso Causeway and Johns Island using benthic sediment traps where wastewater effluent is presently being spread . As you must realize the State of Florida and Indian River County have been impacted negatively by declining water quality. The negative impacts have not only endangered human health, but have killed millions of aquatic animals around the state and within the Indian River Lagoon. This means we are at a critical period to remediate these conditions before they have additional major negative influence on local and Florida economies. The effluent that is to be shipped to the barrier island at Johns Island/Indian River Shores contains a variety of toxins, nutrients and residual elements that can cause disease in humans and long term damage to the health of the Indian River Lagoon, I understand that pharmaceutical products, herbicide residues (glyphosate) and pesticide byproducts can be present in the effluent. ORCA scientists found a peak concentration of the residual toxin microcystin opposite Indian River Shores/Johns Island along with sucralose a tracer of human sewage waste products. Microcystin is now a well-known toxin produced by the cyanobacteria Microcystis now blooming and causing human health problems on a global level. Microcystin is a carcinogen produced in concentrated blooms of Microcysis spp. when it is enhanced by high nutrient levels and also by glyphosate found in Roundup herbicide. ORCA found sucralose levels were also high at this location revealing a human waste/sewerage source of the contaminants. Since the barrier island at this location had sewer service, not septic tanks, they wondered what the sucralose source was? Was it the reuse water presently being used near this location? Sucralose levels in Indian River County reuse water at the central plant was considerably higher than the city reuse water indicating many of the deleterious human contaminants were in higher concentration in the County reuse water that was destined to be applied to the barrier island. Two things concerned me relative to the potentially dangerous impacts of this project in transporting large quantities of contaminated County reuse water to the barrier island, literally the banks of the Indian River Lagoon: We now know from abundant evidence elsewhere in Florida and along the Indian River Lagoon that human waste products even after treatment have caused health problems and disease in humans and aquatic life, including valuable regional fisheries. So, why increase "reuse water" levels on a low elevation barrier island adjacent to the Indian River Lagoon, particularly, when this Lagoon is presently experiencing significant water quality problems, fishery decline and negative economic impacts due to declining water quality? In summary, the addition of toxic reuse water to the barrier island in higher concentration, and dispersed over a larger area, than present reuse water activities will undoubtedly increase nutrient and toxin loading in the Indian River Lagoon in the narrows within Indian River County. This will have negative impacts on the shellfish and fisheries and on those who consume fish from this Lagoon representing a major economic impact and health risk to Indian River County residents who live on the Lagoon and those who utilize the Lagoon for recreation and employment. If you can drink it as pure uncontaminated potable water, then it would be an asset. Unfortunately, it is not and contains toxins. because settlers Europea endured hurricanes pristine marshes homesteads drained pineapples discharge wetlands lagoon. receives freshwater Florida's steam -driven e tended traveled paddleboats Railroad residents automobile industry A HISTORY OF THE LAQOON bridges altering causeways spawne lagoon, populate Population increasing boome The Indian River Lagoon (IRL) is an estuary that covers one-third of Florida's East Coast from New Smyrna to Jupiter. Known locally as the Indian River, the lagoon supports more species than any other estuary in the U.S. The lagoon formed as sea levels rose and fell and rose again. It was a nearshore trench in the Atlantic Ocean when the earth was mostly covered with water. During glacial periods, the sea receded and the area that is now the lagoon was a grassland savanna situated 30 miles inland. As sea level rose again, the current barrier island system was established, creating the Indian River Lagoon by disconnecting it from the ocean. Historically, storm events sent waves over the barrier island, creating new inlets that temporarily connected the lagoon to the ocean, only to be closed again by sand carried south by coastal currents and winds. The lagoon's rich diversity and abundance is due to its location along a climate boundary and its proximity to the Gulf Stream, which approaches within 5 miles of the south lagoon. In the past, ocean fish migrating in the Gulf Stream got swept into the lagoon through inlets and found a perfect spawning ground that was warm, protected, and rich in food. New species evolved and adapted to lagoon conditions. Rays, sawfish, sharks, porpoises and dugongs (ancient manatees) were prolific in ancient times. The indigenous people who lived along the lagoon thousands of years ago were healthy and tall, thriving on abundant fish and shellfish. They left large shell mounds (middens) of refuse from thousands of clam, oyster, and mussel dinners. The Spanish who traveled along the coast of Florida from the 1500-1700's called it the "Lost Lagoon" because they would stormwater nutrient blooms pollution covers po ution healthy, causes sunlight habitats. lagoon. phytoplankto seagrasses Drainage Pro Marine Resources Council IRL Heath Update 2 ept, demonstrate SaveTheIRL.org LETTER FRP- WE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR We know the lagoon is in bad shape why do we need a report to tell us? The purpose of the Indian River Lagoon Health Update is not to reiterate what we already know. The goal is to evaluate changes in the lagoon's health over time so we can see improvement and target efforts where they are most needed. It is a message of hope for our community and a means to evaluate restoration success. Our goal is to produce this report annually, to answer the basic question: Is the lagoon getting better or worse? This initial report shows the change in water quality and seagrass health over the past 20 years to compare it with future conditions. Overall, the lagoon is healthier near inlets where polluted water is mixing with ocean tides. The Indian River Lagoon (IRL) regions that are shallow and have no ocean inlets are particularly susceptible to damage from pollution because the water never leaves. In these regions (like the Mosquito Lagoon, North IRL, and Banana River) muck and algae accumulate, cutting off the light that needs to reach seagrasses. This report has uncovered an alarming lack of data in some areas of the estuary, especially in the southernmost South IRL where there are no water quality monitoring sites at all. State funding cuts have resulted in fewer monitoring stations TABLE OF CONTENTS 131 ASSESSING LAGOON HEALTH FIVE INDICATORS OF HEALTH w� n Ale Marine Resources Council and a reduction in the parameters being collected. The Marine Resources Council (MRC), Marine Discovery Center, Florida Oceanographic Society and the Loxahatchee River District are joining forces to create a single volunteer network to collect more water quality dap and fill in the gaps that the agencies are missing. But even with these efforts, it is still not enough. We need to let our state leaders know that funding for on-going monitoring is important to assess the lagoon's health. (See page 14 to learn more.) The IRL needs help and our community is coming together to help it. We need our political leaders to support policies, funding initiatives, and programs to help the lagoon. The MRC continues to work with our partners throughout the lagoon to educatE youth on lagoon science, to restore shorelines, and to engage citizens in conducting science to inform policy. It's our lagoon, and together we can bring the IRL back to health. Thank you for all that you do for the Indian River Lagoon. WATER QUALITY & HABITAT SCORES ;1[0 STORY OF THE NORTH LAGOOI ?AGE STORY OF THE SOUTH LAGOON inGEI LAGOON RESTORATION Marine Resources Council IRL Health Update 2018 • gle:;11L 'PAGE 14 WHAT CAN YOU DO? 000 2 SaveTheIRL.o Tq.2 -$-� The Irici yanliter.lLagoon indicatorstoassess mans ement decisions a patient s'vital.:signs,_-- r�s�� �. health issues? .lagoon *Pt': rgos11 seagra ,.. nitrrOgen and turbidity like.:blod Just asthe_ health: vindicators, establish'ed lagooh`health indicators. Health lagoon Update medical diagnose defines guide doctor phosphorus, including chlorophyll -a, indica ors cholesterol medical pressure. agencies alues For' exa inple,. St. District::e'stablished Nitrogenr(N)ihould (mgh) ,fol -Ate Banana There aredtfferentttargets �aYtmati:.;,,. '�+ 10 lagoon tgions defined characteristics: Th, e10 Lagoon, ,whichtsdivided (north, central and .s(4th), :the Norte; Lagoon; the Banana;FZiVer3Lagoon `theCen River Lagoon, which' is;d7rded two Photo Credit: R. Spratt itiJ ,h�71�k.�: i`12i 'Rib tn` -�B10 U o o : 1 7 g t n ii OSIA1 '-fljii )rxe€ utC-�f y:L .a;Cci.r evaliatin targets Water Management concentra ion exceed Lagoon Total milligrams/liter estab ished regions include estuarine Mosquito subregions VOIUSIA THE subregions - 10 Regions of the Indian River Lagoon NO, IRL fr j IB'e n`e n`ajRlver Legend IRL Region Mosquito Lagoon North Q Mosquito Lagoon Central © Mosquito Lagoon South r; Banana River North IRL t.J Central IRL North n Central IRL South n South IRL North r---) South IRL Central Q South IRL South Counties ST. Wp£ ;S`ou161RL1N it� Mao, 0 3.75 75 15 22.5 30 iSou[tiflRL�ti,S`oufh' Marine Resources Council RL Health Update 201 8 Scoring the lagoon's health was done by comparing actual water quality and seagrass measurements with the regulatory targets set by state and federal agencies. Thedifference between the targets and the actual values was calculated for each indicator and placed into score categories. Scores for the four water quality indicators (nitrogen, phosphorus, turbidity, and chlorophyll -a) were averaged into Water Quality Scores. The seagrass scores were used for the Habitat Scores. There are two categories of failing scores (<50 and 50-59) and two categories of poor -average grades (60-69 and 70- 79). Meeting the healthy target is considered to be in the good category (80-89) and conditions are very good (>_ 90) if the region is better than the healthy target. Where "No Data" is listed, there was no longer any water quality monitoring conducted. Regulatory targets, offset calculations, and data are available at SaveThelRL.org. 3 GRADING CATAGORIES < 50 EXTREMELY POOR 50 TO 59 60 TO 69 70 To 79 80 TO 89 GOOD VERY POOR POOR FAIR VERY4GOOD - SaveThelRL.org Seagrass reduces erosion and provides habitat and food for many types of lagoon life. The seagrass scores below clearly show the recent seagrass losses throughout the lagoon, even in the Mosquito Lagoon South, where historically seagrass has thrived. There are several reasons- for these losses. Seagrass needs saltwater and high levels of light to survive. Heavy freshwater drainage into the lagoon negatively impacts seagrass, especially if salinity SEAGRASS SCORES drops below 10 parts per thousand for long periods of time. Drainage canals and stormwater also bring sediment into the lagoon, which can smother seagrass and prevent light from reaching the bottom. Too much nitrogen and phosphorus feed excessive algae and phytoplankton which reduce the amount of light reaching seagrass on the bottom. Using herbicides and driving propelled boats through shallow seagrass beds can also destroy seagrass. Seagrass does not grow in the North Mosquito Lagoon due to natural conditions (NA in chart below). YEAR -*r Mosquito Lagoon Mosquito Lagoon Central Mosquito Lagoon South ' ,Banana River North IRL Central IRL North Central IRL South South IRL North South IRL Central South IRL South 1994 NA 61) 70 co, 58 70 66 57 54 72 199s N A 6 70 62F CD 168! 5.6 5 9 NO DATA NO DATA 1996 NA 67 86 6J 59 72 680 57 CO 73 1997 NA 643 0 71 60 73 74 58iimi7'3 1998 INA 66 liblill 74 v5. 75 11Thl CCI IMO 73 1999 moo NA NA 66 NM80 IIM 73 75 68i 74 6'8', 7359V 9} z'D 74 73 2001 NA 111M 80 IMIIIIMI 75 7351NMI 2002 NA 113311111TO 71 NMI ,69'Ems 56 53 80 2003 NA I 8'4 70 66 9 72 57 52 78 2004 NA 58 8M2 71 70 65; 62 73 73 77 69 6.41, 54 53 tA 52 78 2005 NA 57 - zoos NA 58 '81 80 64 78 72 58 55 77 2007 NA 60) 86 87 71 a2 70 61 EMI 78 2008 NA 66 66 fl0 ig3 D3 79 70Ill 71 76 77 75 59 62% 53 7.9 78 2009 NA 53 2010 NA IBM DD MAME 79 75 61! _ 5+5 2011 2012 NA N A 61 O1113111 8'O . ... gib 6'j Bp 11M11- 0- c 57 _4D �1M� ltUllilinlillEN 2013 NA n 78 50 ,1 &571 1.5.4 57 ;621 77 2014 NA 6,„6 79 56 64; 50 57 5t8 5+5 77 2016 NA 61- 78 W 6_P33 59 15.1.0 56 72 2016 NA C30 74 99' - €377 l 56 51 U 6A EXTREMELY POOR Marine Resources Council IRL Health Update 2018 4 Photo credit: SJRWMD Photo credit: SJRWMD SaveThelRL.org Pc) 2q -g- 1 gg Phosphorus (P) is a key nutrient for lagoon health that can be harmful in excess. The table at the right shows phosphorus scores got worse in most of the lagoon in 2010, at the same time the lagoon started to experience persistent algae blooms. Although the Clean Water Act requires phosphorus reductions, concentrations have significantly increased in many lagoon regions. Reducing phosphorus concentrations in the lagoon will improve lagoon health. Phosphorus comes from many sources such as wastewater, wash water of all kinds (car washing, pressure washing, etc.), fertilizers, and sediments. It enters the lagoon through groundwater, stormwater, and canal discharges. Most cities and counties in the lagoon watershed passed fertilizer ordinances that do not allow phosphorus to be applied to the lawn without a soil test confirming it is needed. Check the BeFloridianNow.com website for more information. NITROGEN SCORES EAR Mosquito Lagoon North Mosquito Lagoon Central Mosquito Lagoon South Banana RiverIRL North Central IIRL North Central IRL South South IRL North South IRL Central South IRL South I 1996 SJ 71 79 3Q0-ZiJF 1907 04 , 72 7S L6i i 7 78 . _ 1998 , - 1 - CE JD , 0 Ccx _ i_ 1999 73 ' _ _ Sli 75 Al a co g 2000 77 , 73 OV 76 2001 Q ' (40 7 1 , 78 , 78 CO 2002 78;.6:Z __ 76 77 2003 (6116 SI ._0. n 2004 7 , 71 C13 oil 2005 ca a a i 2 G 75 _ .. 6241 QE3 CO Ca 2007 3@ 71 gl -Cij — co 2008 78 • 4 a 2009 CO ca a 743 2010, a) 60 La _ CID CI? 2011 i 76 . co 2012 76 .0) .., $,.621 77 00 2013 6 4 64 N 0 DATA Marine 2014 79 _ NO DATA 2015 tJ 75 71 6 NO DATA Resources Council Update 2018 5 N 0 DATA 1 IRL Health 1 1996 1997 1998 1999 :Mosquito Lagoon !North 2002 2003 2005 2006 2007 2008 65; 74 84 75 6� 8 68 G_9 Mosquito Lagoon Central PHOSPHORUS SCORES Mosquito Lagoon South iBa na na River North IRL Central IRL North Central IRL South South IRL North South IRL Central South IRL South 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 73 76 90 89 X67 62 73 88 78 CO 92 87 CO 92 91 90 NO DATA NO DATA (6,g) [6'0` 5g3 5 3 NO DATA NO DATA VERY GOOD 3: Nitrogen Nitrogen (N) is another key nutrient necessary to the lagoon's health. However, in excess it can be devastating, causing algae blooms and lowered dissolved oxygen in the water, which chokes out life. The Clean Water Act requires local municipalities to reduce the discharge of nitrogen. Twenty years of data show that these efforts are paying off, as nitrogen levels in some areas of the lagoon have significantly decreased over the past 20 years. The table to the left shows how nitrogen scores were better in the decade from 2005-2015, during which we also had seagrass increases. The nitrogen scores severely declined in 2016, the same year the brown tide caus an extensive fish kill in the Banana River and North I' In the southernmost portion of the South IRL, all wa quality monitoring was discontinued in 2013, thus t missing data thereafter. Nitrogen enters the lagoon through many sourc Water contaminated with nitrogen from fertilize septic tanks, leaking wastewater infrastructure, a animal waste enters the lagoon through stormwa drains, canals and seepage. It is also being releas by the black ooze known as "muck" that covers ab 11% of the lagoon bottom. Marine Resources Council IRL Health Update 2018 6 SaveTheIRL MIVERY GOOD Chlorophyll -a measures the amount of algae in the water, and lagoon health suffers with increasing algae. The table below shows that chlorophyll -a scores dramatically declined from 2009-2016 as algae super blooms expanded through the lagoon. Historically, algae blooms and fish kills would be occasional events during lif.'_;;'" • warm summer months, however the IRL has recentl experienced persistent algae blooms covering hundred of acres and lasting for months, resulting in extensive fish kills, seagrass losses, and marine mammal deathE Canal discharges also carry toxic algae into areas of thi South IRL. CH LOQOPHYLL-A SCORES YEAR 4 Mosquito Lagoon North Mosquito Lagoon Central Mosquito Lagoon South Banana River North IRL Central IRL North Central IRL South Sou h 1 IRL North South IRL Central South IRL South 1996 6Z 6,6, 68' 63 31_36 69 6.6 70 ctiai 78 li97 OA 78 69 so 6 7 7 0 , '7 4 67 68 go 1998 to 7 9 62 64 ' 66, 61, 60 60 a igg9 .103 72 0 64 t 66 71 , 6. 77 2000 cJ 75 69 68 -5-Y0) 63 66 70 , 77 03 2001 • 72 7 5 7 0 61 iv tjjai . Sir 75 ' 7.0 , so 2002 oi 8 _ 62 678J _ 60 68 72 66 I8J4) 2003 8 0 10) CC3 /IteS 0.) cij 77 65 go 2004 49) g63 72 f_14 63.61 :81.71 67 6 2 i 2005 71 78 78 a 69 75 44k 78 6 8 co 73 84 Ift)1 71 gCLO 2007 a 'to) 11,4) NI 75 16 6 2008 go; i .., 73 64. 66 (OA 69 69 , 2009 65 67 77 66 ' ' 6 64 'Fa ; 79 a 2010 71 63 64 aril 66 0, 1531 _ 9 CO a ' 7 69 2012 a RS _ a __ 72 _ 1 I ' 0 6? #4, 184 CV 2013 :68 613.-753 7- Ca 1.§A !till)) ti),) 78 NO DATA 2014 79 70 76 68 63 NO DATA 2015 74 61..13:- i519)T4 73 79 70 NO DATA 2016 fLIV 4 3[5461 69 6,5 go; NO DATA EXTREMELY POOR Marine Resources Council IRL Health Update 2018 7 .org - a o _ 92' �g - � t' • aThIfiilT Turbidity is a measurement of water clarity. Dirty water loaded with sediments and disturbed muck increases turbidity and decreases water clarity. Historical accounts describe the clear "turquoise blue" water in the lagoon that one could see through to the bottom. The data demonstrate that turbidity significantly increased over the 20 years from 1996-2016. Sediment enters the lagoon from canal discharges, stormwater pipes, and run-off. Photo credit: J. Cenker Muck on the bottom is easily stirred up by wind and wave action, muddying the waters until it settles again. Extensive algae blooms also increase turbidity. Clear water is important for the lagoon's seagrasses that must receive sunlight to photosynthesize and grow. Without seagrasses, fisheries decline, manatees starve, and the health of the lagoon decreases. TUBI ODITY SCORES Y R Mosquito Lagoon North Mosquito Lagoon Centrai Mosquito Lagoon South Banana River North IIRL Central IRL North Central II'RL South South IRL North South 'IRL Central South IRL South 1996 :S1 57 67, 71 `8A 73 78 72 62: 69: 1997 r16.3, 45*3 77 QS QS 73 78 54 �6, 4 77 1998 66 59 73 810 S 74 76 51: 68 89 1999 (4 fl 64 94 +8.5 77 7966' S9 415j 2 , co 87 93 97 89 78 Cl) 70 74 g9 2001 1 © 8 '8�2 82 73 73 67 74 CO 2002 G5 57 73 79 +8 75 76 63' 70 85 2003 53 St3 75 74 79 75 79 73 73 2004 E:30 73 70 73 78 73 79 72 6_7; i86 200s 6'8 :fi9; 71 92 79 76 83 73 56 81 200s 76 66, 80 8999 78 76 a 75 i60. 77 2007 i 91 >8g 96 98' 8*3 ) 92 71 64 (8;8 2008 59 70 8ti7 80 43, 74 �8a G7 70 88 2009 70 75 84 CO _ 90 74 78 73 719 2010 6g 51 79 74 78 64 71 73 79 8.9 2011 06) 49 6`O: 5*2 EP 58 56 75 8J1 Cgi 20112 0 51 6`O 9 fi ;88889F81 7 7 78 7 9 8$ 2013 79 70 7'9 el X8_33 a*2 a 77 79 NO DATA 2014 76 .6z4 !+U u 79 91 79 77 NO DATA 2015 75 [61 56 `"8�5 1812 76 79 79 74 NO DATA 2016 T$}3 [etz ra 76 71 79 X88 74 77 NO DATA Marine Resources Council IRL Health Update 2018 8 SaveTheIRL.org I�q 24g'!3 monitoring station data may ypo; extremelor, the overall.score for region may average out to circles show`the `score; for .the station and the'' region color score,0all of the stations. of'the lagoon arrcr compare regions ee.: other, {a'reas of the 'Iess'°healthv n terms of (,yellow). specific shows t�''("� .i +1 +A t>�:t': n. •:C py our team calculated annual water quality,:�and habitat healthaco s'infeachgoonrare'a.=Wate quality scores Were :developed Yusinngg '_lithe water quality: in`dic' ors: nitro en : ph'os horns, turbidity, and cliloroph, 'ylaHaabita tL cores looked at the fifth= indicator:-seagrass3 The;maps M,;.a-.mss ~ l° are divided 'into -the north mouth. acid show the average scores in :20.16 fgr,eachonitoring station and each area, Asq you`canAsee circles, we have, monitoring stations throughout the lagoon to provide waqu ter,'ality andKhabitat regions, habitat abo,i, habitat? >In m soe qualliitfy sco e :is good ,and bad;►. an'dln others it is_ the} th, eB auana-River1had poor ore habitat(scs In120'-6, which tide caused -the ;e)densive area YWhere are the monitoring worst scores located? • 2016 HABITAT Mosquito Lagoon_ North .:§5 HABITAT INDICATOR WATER QUALITY INDICATORS 2016 SCORES Monitoring. Station North IRL=51 CM3 • BREVARD SaJ. 11t a 5lan 70 — 79 (Fair) 60 — 69 (Poor) 50 — 59 (Very Poor) 0 — 49 (Extemely Poor) No Data Counties Marine Resources Council IRL Health Update 2018 9 SaveTheIRL.or: Pr 2o•i4 J ,s [r Can we open an inlet and flush the lagoon out? The story of the North Lagoon is about decades of pollution discharged into regions of the lagoon that never circulate due to a lack of ocean access. The North Lagoon has only two inlets 100 miles apart that connect regions of the lagoon to the Atlantic Ocean. The New Smyrna Inlet located in the Mosquito Lagoon North and the Sebastian Inlet located in the Central IRL North do not generate adequate flow to move nutrients out to sea. These nutrients become more and more concentrated in the North Lagoon, causing catastrophic algae blooms, seagrass losses, and the accumulation of muck. Additionally, agricultural ditching, urban development, and flood control channels have increased the amount of water discharged into the North Lagoon, contributing millions of pounds of pollutants to the area. Although it is tempting to think that opening a new inlet will solve this problem, predictive models suggest that there would be little impact. Tidal influences would be very localized and may not generate enough water flow to flush the area. Opening an inlet would also send pollution out to our ocean and beaches. Furthermore, it would disrupt the flow of sand reaching the beaches south of it, resulting in costly beach renourishment and inlet dredging projects. That being said, engineers at Florida Tech continue to evaluate this possibility, running simulations to determine its effectiveness. Brown tide. Photo credit: C. Rubadoux. Florida Today March 2013 Solving the problems in the North Lagoon requires reducing the pollutants that are entering it, restoring the filtration systems that have been removed, and removing the muck that has accumulated on the bottom. There is no easy fix. It took decades of pollution to cause these problems and it will take decades of hard work to solve them. Marine Resources Council IRL Health Update 2018 10 Brown tide. Photo credit: R. Spratt SaveTheIRL.org DD Why does the water quality look so good The South Lagoon is somewhat of a special case, where the watershed has been dramatically altered by the construction of the C-44 canal. The C-44 canal connects Lake Okeechobee to the south fork of the St. Lucie River which discharges into the South IRL Central. Lake Okeechobee is managed as a reservoir for large-scale agriculture. When there is a drought and the lake is low, water managers reserve water in the lake to use for agricultural irrigation. When it starts to rain arid lake levels are high, billions of gallons of nutrient rich, silt -laden fresh water are discharged into the estuary causing toxic algae blooms, high turbidity, and low salinity. These conditions kill seagrass and are a threat to lagoon and human health. The South IRL has three relatively large, well -spaced inlets that allow the lagoon water to exchange with the ocean. Water quality in the South IRL appears to when the seagrass is completely gone? be better than other regions like the Banana River or the Mosquito Lagoon. One reason is that the nutrients are quickly diluted by ocean water near the inlets. Secondly, even though salinity can be low after fresh water discharges from Lake Okeechobee, salinity is not being considered a health indicator because there are no established regulatory targets throughout thE lagoon. Third, many monitoring stations have beer discontinued and certain important water quality parameters, (harmful algal blooms, for example) aren' monitored at all. Clearly, regulatory standards tha examine nitrogen and phosphorus levels do no capture the picture of toxic algae, sudden salinit' change, and turbidity that is effectively killing the South Lagoon. Nutrient pollution is a problem, but th( elephant in the room for the South IRL is the Laki Okeechobee discharges. Marine Resources Council IRL Health Update 2018 11 Lake Okeechobee releases coming through the South IRL and St. Lucie Inlet in Photo credit: J. ThurlowLjp SaveTheIRL 2.4S 80 — 89 (Good 70 — 79 (Fair) 60—GS(Poor) 50-58(Very Poor) 0 — 49 (Extemely Poor) No Data Great blue heron during algae bloom. Photo credit: R. Fatzinger Marine Resources Council IRL Health Update 2018 12 SaveTheIm-mu E8600H LsTrncGkn LAND `." AT[E R CONNECTION $ <1NLAND I j FLOW e FISH KILL OYSTER LOSS SEAGRASS LOSS CLAM LOSS OCEAN FLOW 1- MUCK COMMERCIAL FISHING A BLOOM ALGAE LOOMLGAE ;U A � � \ < rRECREATION %ow 74t- •Aor r FRESHWATER ••• 411611HIMI Lagoon Restoration is a Marathon, Not a Sprint AQUATIC SPECIES INPUT SYMBOLS The lagoon is linked to the land that surrounds it through a series of canals, tributaries, and storm drains. Everything that we do on the land impacts the lagoon, whether it is cutting new drainage canals, building new roads and buildings, or fertilizing the lawn. Restoring the lagoon's health is fundamentally about reducing all of the sources of pollution entering it from the watershed. Restoring the lagoon to a healthy system will take a united lagoon community approaching the problem from many different angles. We need to implement better stormwater strategies that encourage water to percolate into the ground instead of running off into the lagoon. We need to improve our wastewater infrastructure and require high efficiency septic tanks. We need to establish natural lagoon buffers, reduce fertilizer and herbicide use, and adopt alternative landscapes. At the same time, we need to restore living resources like mangroves, shellfish, and seagrasses and remove the muck that continues to pollute the lagoon from the bottom. There is no quick fix to the problem. It will take decades to bring our lagoon back to a healthy, highly productive system. Marine Resources Council IRL Health Update 2018 13 Fortunately, our lagoon community is inspired and highly motivated to bring our estuary back to health. Brevard County residents successfully passed a half -cent sales tax dedicated to lagoon restoration. Many cities have signed an agreement to work cooperatively to protect and restore the lagoon. New nonprofits have emerged to join the community of organizations dedicated to lagoon protection and restoration. In addition, the Marine Resources Council regularly assembles community conferences to reach consensus on priority actions and support lagoon protection policies. We engage citizen scientists in research to monitor the lagoon, to identify pollutant sources, and to map and prioritize muck management projects. We grow and plant thousands of mangroves on the lagoon shoreline every year to help filter water, stabilize the shoreline and provide much-needed fish and bird habitat. We reach out to adult and youth audiences with updates on the lagoon, progress reports, and strategies to reduce pollution. It will take our entire community's efforts to bring our lagoon back to health, and these projects are the beginning. ?ti SaveThe&RL.org o Apply slow-release nitrogen Gagitanoft (tim cdo a wiz calbgio 91E021 i Cii elk& September & @to tb title (DO d di& ted.1 Gilanigked311121113001129200 lagoon once BeFloridianNow.org tow 01h9 mibeilmilAng0 op Ole flazonlim edinkg 011Gatezail driveway, through TIloillOoragew nweaftartIat cft9 Laila •. cIippngsCS CO (1112 0221aEad KIM? PC:1117 Rig) tow MIA stormdraintam eridcontactc mtrAy ey 0 02 wop mule) about Eft@ eaminad3 dieatEla049 herbicides 0 Ctal gap illiaanin Opemeua tik septic Gm& schedule o WZIUD EGG CM tzglituP EGSTLIZ OGIG NG checked filkia (11:11B ail house a) al2 IrEd GO tiara MD fin% Datil@ gimulaillan leaking out, digaBamiuGEMD comes, Gitie flU GM to Ohm EMIG meamaisu OMB= plant tbCnalliffpaiddischarge lla? a Eft c Ma old gag groundwater Speak website 0 late at4SaveTheIRL.org. involved! going lagoon. Photo credit: MRC Meeig51236zuzgoeffiyinformed ji4bI*3 Marine Resources Council IRL Health Update 2018 14 Mangrove planting. Photo credit: MRC SaveTheIRL.org qelAg-ig Dolphin: $50,000+ Galesi Family Foundation IRL National Estuary Program Manatee: $25,000-$49,999 Jim and Jonnie Swann Corporation Pridmore Family Foundation, Inc. Mangrove: $10,000-$24,999 Applied Ecology, Inc. MRC LagoonFest 2016 Uppercase, Inc. Snook: $5,000-$9,999 Bass Pro Shops Melbourne BMW The Moir Family Northrop Grumman Redfish: $1,000-$4,999 David R. Heil, P.A. Vince Lamb Oyster: Up to $999 Col. Jim and Marcia Ridenour Conradina Chapter of the Florida Native Plant Society Douglas and Mary Sphar Helayne Ray Joseph and Sylvana Strawn Leon Stein MJ Waters Nancy Roberts and Mike Godfrey Raymond Fink Tim Deratany and Liz Lamb Turtle Coast Sierra Club This project was supported almost entirely by community members like you. Please support the next Health Update by contributing online at SaveTheIRL.org. A copy of the official registration and financial information may be obtained from the Division of Consumer Services by calling toll-free within the state. Registration does not imply endorsement, approval, or recommendations by the state. The toll-free number of the department is 1 -800 -HELP -FLA (435-7352)—calling from within the state of Florida, or (850) 410-3800—vcalling from outside of Florida. The department's website is www.800helpfla.com. [s. 496.412(1)(c), F.S.]. (4 Z r 2,0 Photo credit: J. Cenker DATE: April 22, 2019 TO: Indian River County Board of County Commissioners FROM: Ruth Stanbridge, President, Indian River County Historical Society We will be providing some comments on this private project that is being proposed for the Winter Beach Bridge Road corridor and its bridgeheads. This 1920s "post and view" road is listed on Indian River County's Comprehensive Land Use Plan as a Scenic and Historic Road. It is also eligible for recognition as a Florida Heritage Landmark. Whether owned entirely by the County or partially owned by the Mosquito Control District, this historic bridge road and its bridgeheads are public properties. Both the County and the District, as governmental bodies, must determine (before issuing any permits or allowing any easements) what is in the best interest of the public. The historical and natural resources of Indian River County should have the highest priority. The Historical Society believes this proposed project is NOT in the best interest of the public. The future revenue stream - promised - will fall far short of the damages, destruction, and future impacts to the resources in this area of the Indian River. There are other alternatives - already identified - that will provide the needs of the John's Island development and other developments on Orchid Island. • Since this project is NOT about drinkable (potable) water; when the leak occurs, it will be questionable wastewater that flows into a very fragile part of the Indian River Lagoon at the Narrows. • This project is NOT about protecting or enhancing natural areas. On the contrary, the proposed plans call for the placement of large, heavy directional drilling equipment on the top of a mature natural coastal hammock with 100 -year-old trees and maritime understory. Clear cutting will take place and this natural area and historic site will be destroyed. • Also, this proposed project will be tunneling under the historical Bridgetender's Park and through the root systems of mature native trees and cultural (and possible archaeological) artifacts that may be there. • The public's fishing and launching area at the 69th Street bridgehead will be impacted and damaged by the placement of another set of directional drilling equipment. • Last, but not least, storage of this questionable wastewater will be in open ponds on a narrow barrier island limited in land mass, with high-water tables, and storm surges. Of course, all sorts of signage will be needed to advise not to drink, eat the fish, or wash your hands in these wastewater ponds. • NO, this proposed project is NOT in the best interest of the public and taxpayers of Indian River County. This is a private project requested by a private development to irrigate a private golf course! The Historical Society respectfully ask this Board to reject any requests that would destroy, damage or bring impacts to the scenic and historic Winter Beach Bridge Road and its bridgeheads both on the mainland at 69th Street and on Orchid Island at the Bridgetender's Park. Thank you. ql Dig The cul-de-sac in the ROW of Winter Beach Bridge Road to be clear cut for directional drilling equipment. Western edge of the cul-de-sac...mature maritime hammock & understory replaced by drilling equipment below. • I- 3 *.r7M. 1 ::fi' r,. L. Tts Extensive further old-growth destruction is now planned at end of Old Winter Beach Rd. EXCAVATOR (From most recent pipeline pion g documents dated 12/10/18) 1'1� _ BUFFER ZONE E EASEMENT(P) ��yy� DRILL RIG 1 Y A720'XX 10'w ORILL'•� STEERING TRXILER. 7 6; 91d HOUSE sanitary manhole \ frim .el 5.87 tlow1ino el 2.19 ao' DRAINAGE UTILITY EASEMEN (P) j!OUMPSTER_' Note: Tree canopy under drilling equipment — underground directional drilling will extend into Bridgetender's Park (double black line on left]. Clear cutting of 100+plus trees and all understory. al21t,A4 Bridgetender's Park where further damage could occur to root systems and cultural/archaeological artifacts. ("C.-) HISTORIC BRIDGE TEDDER'S SITE CLOSED DUSK TILL DAT,t( qq 24g { John's Island -- Club—West% Course S ��Q��edo� �ti�O `app `die ,`�t\�o .\55 p • 6e• �Qeo'� 5\ Wastewater Effluent°.1 Source Tank r' \ 0 •\ 'OLO W1141E41', :BEACH RD' Existing County infrastructure: o .4116. i John's Island Club IRCGIS, IRCPA IRC Planning Dept Existing 16" JI private irrigation pipeline: 1 00.00.00, ramaileOlem .10101WMIONO 1110.111110.011s 4000111•1140. 4000 411.10010MM IWOOMMINOr 011=111.11.01, ei1,1011100010. 40110141110,10 IMAM diblemempor ftwaspoop anippoompor ONIONIONIIM 414110010Memooll, memolIMMINNII 11111011=1.11t Comparison: Two of the Top 10 Most -challenging HDD Projects in the US* * Brierley Associates, in its August 2018 report to County, referring to John's Island's proposed pipeline: "To my knowledge, there have only been around 10 HDD crossings attempted at this length with plastic pipe." qQ 24g as St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant Transmission Line John's Island's Wastewater Effluent Pipeline Alternatives available None (1) Existing County pipe (2) Existing JIWM pipe Risk justification: Customers served 4.8 Million One private community Engineer Large, multinational firm with deep HDD skills David Knight and staff in Vero, Beach Contractor Fortune 400 company with industry-leading HDD experience ? Risk of liquid nutrient leakage into Lagoon No Yes County liability None Unlimited after one year * Brierley Associates, in its August 2018 report to County, referring to John's Island's proposed pipeline: "To my knowledge, there have only been around 10 HDD crossings attempted at this length with plastic pipe." qQ 24g as Setting the Record Straight on the John's Island Reuse Waterline Fiction Fact "This waterline will only exist to supply a golf course." This project will serve John's Island residents, not the golf course. It is completely self-funded, yet all IRC taxpayers will benefit due to the revenues generated by the additional sale of reuse water. After its construction, nearby communities will be able to tap into the waterline for their needs as well. "Running the waterline via existing piping on the Wabasso Bridge will satisfy John's Island's needs in a more environmentally -friendly manner." This method would not provide enough water supply to meet John's Island's current needs, especially during the summer months. Piping on the bridge is more prone to damage due to susceptibility to severe weather and hazards associated with its exposure. Any water leaked from the bridge would still enter the Lagoon. "Drilling in the Indian River would utilize fracking, a process widely -recognized as threatening to the surrounding environment." I This is in noway related to horizontal directional drilling method to be utilized in the waterline's construction. 'Fracking' refers to the crude oil extraction technique in which high-pressure pumps fracture and release oil reserves from thousands of feet below ground. Drilling for this project will occur at approximately 75 feet and through sand, which is among the easiest and safest substances to drill through. "Drilling in the Indian River Lagoon could lead to 'frack outs' that damage the surrounding environment." The firm hired has never experienced a frac- out on a subaqueous drill of their design, and the risk of frack-outs in the project is almost non-existent. SUI uses various methods to specifically mitigate the risk of frack-outs, including using divers to monitor the drill path during installation. The drilling fluids to be utilized are completely safe and non-toxic. https://www.johnsislandwaterline.org/ "Drilling beneath the Indian River Lagoon may affect the local aquifer or local fault lines, potentially even causing an earthquake." Expert geologists consulted by JIWM have attested that there is no risk to local geological formations. There is also no risk whatsoever of the drilling process causing an earthquake. The top of the Floridan Aquifer in eastern Indian River County is known to be at a depth of between 300 and 500 feet, while drilling for the waterline will reach approximately 75 feet. "The pipeline's construction will threaten many of the plants and wildlife that make their homes in and around the Indian River Lagoon." JIWM commissioned environmental biologists to review this project and provide a series of safeguards that will ensure impacts to the local ecosystem are kept to an absolute minimum. All the recommended safeguards will be implemented and actively monitored. This firm also worked with the St. John's River Water Management District and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers to complete an Environmental Assessment and a Submerged Aquatic Vegetation Survey. Both concluded that there would be no significant impact either above or below the Indian River Lagoon. The waterline will meet all DEP requirements. "Reuse water contains unsafe nutrients and is bad for the environment." Treated reuse water does not constitute a major source on excess nutrients. Reuse meets the strict water quality standards established and enforced by the Florida Department of Environmental Protection. Irrigation using reclaimed water reduces the need for chemical fertilizers. "The waterline could burst, spilling its contents into the Indian River Lagoon." Similar underwater pipelines have been in use throughout Florida for decades without bursting. The driller is highly qualified and has never experienced a pipe failure during drilling and installation. "The waterline's construction will cause too much noise." SUI has successfully utilized noise mitigation methods on many previous projects and will keep peak noise levels well below the allowable threshold. A specialty firm will be commissioned to continuously monitor noise and vibration levels. https://www.iohnsislandwaterline.org/ Oct. 2.03 -� Throughout the Years'- 1943 Throughout the Years - 1957 q.2,*())--