Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
12/03/2019
�ORi� A BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS INDIAN RIVER COUNTY FLORIDA COMMISSION AGENDA TUESDAY, DECEMBER 3, 2019 - 9:00 AM Commission Chambers Indian River County Administration Complex 180127th Street, Building A Vero Beach, Florida, 32960-3388 www.iregov.com COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Chairman Susan Adams Jason E. Brown, County Administrator Vice Chairman Joseph Flescher Dylan Reingold, County Attorney Commissioner Tim Zorc Jeffrey R. Smith, Clerk of the Circuit Court and Comptroller Commissioner Peter O'Bryan Commissioner Bob Solari 1. CALL TO ORDER 2.A. A MOMENT OF SILENT REFLECTION FOR FIRST RESPONDERS 2.B. INVOCATION Pastor Gregory Sempsrott, Vero Bible Fellowship 3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Commissioner Peter D. O'Bryan 4. ADDITIONS/DELETIONS TO THE AGENDA / EMERGENCY ITEMS 5. PROCLAMATIONS and PRESENTATIONS 6. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 6.A. Budget Workshop Meeting of July 17, 2019 Attachments: 07172019 D raft 6.B. Preliminary Budget Hearing of September 11, 2019 Attachments: 09112019 Budget Meeting Minutes Draft 6.C. Final Budget Hearing of September 18, 2019 Attachments: 09182019 Final Budget Hearing Draft December 3, 2019 Page 1 of 6 6.D. Regular Meeting Minutes of August 13, 2019 Attachments: 08132019BCC Draft 7. INFORMATION ITEMS FROM STAFF OR COMMISSIONERS NOT REQUIRING BOARD ACTION 7.A. Update On All Aboard Florida Expenses Attachments: Staff Report All Aboard FL Expenses 7.B. Indian. River County Venue Event Calendar Review Attachments: Staff Report 7.C. 2019-2020 City of Vero Beach Appointments Attachments: Staff Report Vero Beach 2019-2020 7.D. 2019-2020 City of Fellsmere Appointments Attachments: Staff Report Fellsmere 2019-2020 8. CONSENT AGENDA 8.A. 26th Street - Advance Acquisition of Right -of -Way 2601 51st Avenue, Vero Beach, FL 32966 Owner: Theodore Bartosiewicz Attachments: Staff Report PURCHASE AGREEMENT BOUNDARY SURVEY 8.B. Release of Retainage - Work Order No. 12 Morgan & Eklund, Inc., Post Hurricane Dorian Beach Profile Surveys Attachments: Staff Report 8.C. Request to Waive the Bid Process for the Replacement of Blowers for the Sludge Holding Tank at West Regional Wastewater Treatment Facility Attachments: Staff Report Larry Schlitt Construction Inc Proposal 8.D. Groundwater Modeling and Impact Evaluations with CDM Smith Attachments: Staff Report Work Order No 5 with CDM 8.E. Fee Agreement with Hopping Green & Sams, P.A. (HGS) Attachments: Staff Report Fee Agreement December 3, 2019 Page 2 of 6 8.F. Interlocal Agreement with School Board for Maintenance of Special Needs Shelter Generator at Treasure Coast Elementary School Attachments: Staff Report Exhibit A Interlocal Agreement Exhibit B Annual Cost Spreadsheet 8.G. Resolution Canceling Taxes on a Property Purchased by the City of Fellsmere for Public Purposes Attachments: Staff Report Resolution 8.H. Requesting approval of applicants to IRC Census 2020 Community Action Committee Attachments: Commissioner's Memorandum Application 1 (A. Brown) Application 2 (A. Miller) Application 3 (J. Price) 9. CONSTITUTIONAL OFFICERS and GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES 10. PUBLIC ITEMS A. PUBLIC HEARINGS 10.A.1. County Initiated Request to Amend the 5 Year Capital Improvements Program and the Supporting Data and Analysis of the Capital Improvements Element of the Comprehensive Plan for the Period FY 2019/20 - 2023/24 - Legislative Attachments: Staff Report Comprehensive Plan Text Amendment Application Comprehensive Plan Text Amendment Ordinance Strike Through and Underline Version of CIE Appendix A - CIE 2019 B. PUBLIC DISCUSSION ITEMS C. PUBLIC NOTICE ITEMS 10.C.1. Public Notice of Public Hearing Scheduled for December 10, 2019 Concerning Extension of Temporary Moratorium Regarding Biosolids - Legislative Attachments: Staff Report 10.C.2. Public Notice of Public Hearing Scheduled for December 10, 2019 to Consider Adopting an Ordinance to Amend Section 205.09 of the Code of Indian River County - LEGISLATIVE Attachments: Staff Report December 3, 2019 Page 3 of 6 10.C.3. Notice of Public Hearing Scheduled for December 17, 2019: Consideration of an Ordinance to Amend County Code Chapter 308, Indian River County Housing Assistance Program (Legislative) Attachments: Staff Report 11. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR MATTERS 11.A. Letter from the Indian River County Board of County Commissioners thanking Governor Ron DeSantis for his attention to high speed passenger rail safety Attachments: Staff Report Letter re Rail Safety 12. DEPARTMENTAL MATTERS A. Community Development 12.A.1. Consideration of the Gifford Neighborhood Plan Annual Report Card for 2019 Attachments: Staff Report 2019 Report Card 2014 GNP Actions Draft 2019 CIE GNP Projects B. Emergency Services C. General Services 1. Human Services 2. Sandridge Golf Club 3. Recreation D. Human Resources E. Office of Management and Budget F. Public Works G. Utilities Services 12.G.1. Synagro Dewatering and Sewage Sludge Removal Contract Renewal and Price Increase Attachments: Staff Report Sample Extension 13. COUNTY ATTORNEY MATTERS 14. COMMISSIONERS MATTERS A. Commissioner Susan Adams, Chairman B. Commissioner Joseph E. Flescher, Vice Chairman December 3, 2019 Page 4 of 6 C. Commissioner Tim Zorc D. Commissioner Peter D. O'Bryan E. Commissioner Bob Solari 14.E.1. Citizens Against the Train (CATT) Video Attachments: Commissioners Memo 14.E.2. Gifford Gardens and the Affordable Housing Committee. Attachments: Commissioners Memo 15. SPECIAL DISTRICTS AND BOARDS A. Emergency Services District 15.A.1. Approval of Meeting Minutes August 13, 2019 15.A.2. Approval of FY 2019/2020 EMS County Awards Grant: Purchase of Capital/Operating Equipment Using Non -Matching EMS Grant Funds and Grant Resolution Attachments: Staff Report County Grant Form EMS County Awards Grant Application EMS County Awards Grant Resolution B. Solid Waste Disposal District C. Environmental Control Board 16. ADJOURNMENT December 3, 2019 Page 5 of 6 Except for those matters specifically exempted under the State Statute and Local Ordinance, the Board shall provide an opportunity for public comment prior to the undertaking by the Board of any action on the agenda, including those matters on the Consent Agenda. Public comment shall also be heard on any proposition which the Board is to take action which was either not on the Board agenda or distributed to the public prior to the commencement of the meeting. Anyone who may wish to appeal any decision which may be made at this meeting will need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made which includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal will be based. Anyone who needs a special accommodation for this meeting may contact the County's Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Coordinator at (772) 226-1223 at least 48 hours in advance of meeting. Anyone who needs special accommodation with a hearing aid for this meeting may contact the Board of County Commission Office at 772-226-1490 at least 20 hours in advance of the meeting. The full agenda is available on line at the Indian River County Website at www.ircgov.com The full agenda is also available for review in the Board of County Commission Office, the Indian River County Main Library, and the North County Library. Commission Meetings are broadcast live on Comcast Cable Channel 27 Rebroadcasts continuously with the following proposed schedule: Tuesday at 6:00p.m. until Wednesday at 6:00 a.m., Wednesday at 9:00 a. m. until 5:00 p.m., Thursday at 1:00 p.m. through Friday Morning, and Saturday at 12:00 Noon to 5: 00 p.m. December 3, 2019 Page 6 of 6 Indian River County Florida Indian River County Administration Complex 1801 27th Street, Building A Vero Beach, Florida, 32960-3388 www.1rcgov. com Meeting Minutes - Draft Wednesday, July 17, 2019 9:00 AM 2019/2020 Budget Workshop * Tentative Schedule Commission Chambers Board of County Commissioners Bob Solari, Chairman, District 5 Susan Adams, Vice Chairman, District 1 Joseph E. Flescher, District 2 Peter D. O'Bryan, District 4 Tim Zorc, District 3 Jason E. Brown, County Administrator Dylan Reingold, County Attorney Jeffrey R. Smith, Clerk of the Circuit Court and Comptroller Jacqueline Rizzo- Deputy Clerk 1 Board of County Commissioners Meeting Minutes - Draft July 17, 2019 CALL TO ORDER ROLL CALL INVOCATION Rev. Dan Holloway, Unity Spiritual Center of Vero Beach PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Dylan Reingold, County Attorney GENERAL OVERVIEW SESSION JASON E. BROWN, COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR 19-0644 Attachments: Budget Message GENERAL FUND 001-101 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS 001-102 COUNTY ATTORNEY 001-107 COMMUNICATIONS/EMERGENCY SERVICE 110-109 MAIN LIBRARY 001-112 NORTH COUNTY LIBRARY 001-113 BRACKETT LIBRARY 001-118 IRC SOILAND WATER CONSERVATION 001-119 LAW LIBRARY 001-201 ADMINISTRATOR - OPERATIONS 001-202 GENERAL SERVICES 001-203 HUMAN RESOURCES 001-206 VETERANS SERVICE 001-208 EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT Indian River County Florida lige 1 Board of County Commissioners Meeting Minutes - Draft July 17, 2019 001-210 PARKS 001-211 HUMAN SERVICES 001-212 AG EXTENSION 001-215 CONSERVATION LANDS 001-216 PURCHASING 001-220 FACILITIES MANAGEMENT 001-229 OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET 001-237 FPL GRANT EXPENDITURES 001-238 EMERGENCY BASE GRANT 001-241 IS/TELECOMM TRANSFER 001-246 INSURANCE PREMIUMS 001-260 COUNTY ANIMAL CONTROL 001-251 MAILROOM/SWITCHBOARD 001-283 INDIAN RIVER LAGOON 19-0645 Attachments: General Fund Through the use of a PowerPoint Presentation, County Administrator Jason Brown announced that the fiscal year (FY) Proposed Budget for the County is $367,725,135, a decrease of $31,295,303 or 7.84% from the current year. He highlighted the major impacts to the Budget for FY 2019/2020, including an increase of 7% Countywide and 6.97% Unincorporated Area in the tax roll; funding for the Sheriff included continued funding of School Resource Officers at a 50/50 split with the school district; an increase of $397,146 for the Children Services; position increases, health insurance increase of $1.9 million; a focus on technology and cybersecurity enhancements, new IT Director position; increase investment in conservation lands improvements and maintenance; and Full-time position increase - BCC increase of 37 positions at a cost of $2,594,142; 3 full-time Constitutional Officers, 40 total full-time positions. Indian River County Florida Page 2 Board of County Commissioners Meeting Minutes - Draft July 17, 2019 General Fund Budget Overview: • Ad valorem tax roll increase of $4,097,056, or 6.97% • Proposed Millage Rate is 3.5475, up 2.5% from last year Constitutional Officers - an increase of $3,792,700 or 6.5% • State Mandates/Constitutional Officers - 73.7% of the total budget • Children Services - an increase of $397,146 or 23.8% • State Agencies - an increase of $234,846 or 6.7% • Facility Deferred Maintenance and Capital - $777,053 • Indian River Lagoon Master Plan - $200,000 estimated cost • Increase Health Insurance - $842,220 includes Constitutional Officers • Net Increase of 5.5 full-time BCC positions $326,282; Constitutional Officers increase of 3 full-time positions General Fund Expenses for 2019/2020 BCC Departments: • BCC Operations - $1,083,806, a decrease of ($8,636) or (0.8%) • County Attorney - $942,171, a decrease of ($11,824) or (1.2%) • Geographical Information System Transfer - $69,524, a decrease of ($18,199) or (20.7%) • Communication/Emergency Services - $605,025, an increase of $12,608 or 2.1% • Main Library - $2,525,245, a decrease of ($22,289) or (0.9%) • North County Library - $1,123,844, a decrease of ($39,961) or (3.4%) • Brackett Library - $336,649, an increase of $27,308 or 8.8% • Soil Conservation - $53,572, an increase of $2,490 or 0.9% • Law Library - $91,993, an increase of $794 or 0.9% • Administrator - $578,677, a decrease of ($11,759) or (2.0%) • General Services - $151,265, a decrease of ($6,859) or (4.3%) • Human Resources - $547,518, a decrease of ($89,008) or (14%) • Planning & Development - $0, a decrease of ($6,000) or (100%) • Veterans Services - $275,437, an increase of $6,240 or 2.3% • Emergency Management - $435,128, a decrease of ($163,376) or (27.3%) • Parks - $2,672,535, an increase of $52,034 or 2.0% • Human Services - $281,600, an increase of $15,031 or 5.6% • AG Extension - $184,944, a decrease of ($15,801) or (7.9%) • Conservation Lands - $451,534, an increase of $451,534 or N/A • Purchasing - $214,271, an increase of $8,019 or 3.9% • Facilities Management - $4,516,277, an increase of $403,666 or 9.8% • Management and Budget - $332,470, a decrease of ($29,102) or (8.0%) • FPL Grant - $129,580, an increase of $10,312 or 8.6% • EM Base Grant - $105,597, a decrease of ($12,228) or (10.4%) • Computer Services Transfer - $776,431, an increase of $133,066 or 20.7% • Insurance Premiums - $291,715, an increase of $1,397 or 0.5% • Animal Control - $58,720, a decrease of ($18,217) or (3.0%) Indian River County Florida P4ge 3 Board of County Commissioners Meeting Minutes - Draft July 17, 2019 • Mailroom - $165,052, a decrease of ($218,074) or (56.9%) • Indian River Lagoon - $271,560, an increase of $145,480 or 115.4% Total BCC Departments $19,795,140, an increase of $599,246 or 3.1% Chairman Solari announced that Deputy Clerk Maureen Gelfo, Clerk to the Board, was retiring and thanked her for her past 12 years of service to the Board of County Commissioners. The Chairman opened the floor for public comments. Mr. Dan Stump noticed there was money in the Budget for the Law Library and inquired on the location of the library. CONSTITUTIONAL OFFICERS Administrator Brown announced the proposed Constitutional Officers, budget as follows: • Clerk of Court - $1,104,029, an increase of $48,385, or 4.6% • Tax Collector - $1,561,704, a decrease of ($23,400) or (1.5%) presented for informational purposes, their budget is not due until August 1, 2019 • Property Appraiser - $3,178,023, an increase of $65,503 or 2.1% • Sheriff- $53,602,098, an increase of $3,453,723 or 6.3% • Sheriff Electric - $820,800, no change from the current year or 0% • Supervisor of Elections - $1,617,014, an increase of $248,489 or 18.2% • Value Adjustment Board - $60,000, no increase from current year or 0% The proposed total for Constitutional Officers is $61,943,668, an increase of $3,792,700 or 6.5% The Chairman opened the floor for public comments. Clerk of the Circuit Court and Comptroller Jeffery R. Smith commented on Kristin Daniels transition into her new position and noted that she was an excellent Budget Director. Property Appraiser Wesley S. Davis thanked the Board. Leslie Swan, Supervisor of Elections, expressed her appreciation to the Board for their support, and stated that there would be an extra County -wide election that would require a lot of resources. Additionally, there was an unexpected mandate from Governor DeSantis that all ballots and all election material be translated into Spanish. She spoke on cyber security, and made mention that the IT Manager at the Supervisor of Elections Office was going to retire soon, and there was a need for an additional person who would need to be trained through a presidential election cycle, and 2020 redistricting. Ms. Swan mentioned that the Canvassing Board Workshop had been moved to October, and offered the members of the Indian River County Florida 133ge 4 Board of County Commissioners Meeting Minutes - Draft July 17, 2019 Board the opportunity to attend the training. Leslie Swan thanked County Attorney Dylan Reingold for helping her through the challenges and saving the County money. Indian River County Sheriff Loar thanked the Board and appreciated the camaraderie with Administrator Brown. Commissioner O'Bryan talked about the budget cut for the Sheriff's office and how Sheriff Loar had cooperated with adjusting his budget, and commended the Sheriff for working with the Board. Commissioner Flescher thanked Sheriff Loar and all of the Constitutional Officers for their humble requests. Chairman Solari thanked Sheriff Loar. Administrator Brown commended the Sheriff for working with the Board to cut his budget, and stated that he enjoyed working with him on the Budget. 001-300 CLERK OF CIRCUIT COURT AND COMPTROLLER, JEFFREY R. SMITH 19-0646 Attachments: Clerk of the Circuit Court 001-400 TAX COLLECTOR, CAROLE JEAN JORDAN 19-0647 Attachments: Tax Collector 001-500 PROPERTY APPRAISER, WESLEY S. DAVIS 19-0648 Attachments: Property Appraiser 001-700 SUPERVISOR OF ELECTIONS, LESLIE R. SWAN 19-0649 Attachments: Supervisor of Elections 001-114 VALUE ADJUSTMENT BOARD Indian River County Florida i6ge 5 Board of County Commissioners Meeting Minutes - Draft July 17, 2019 19-0650 Attachments: Value Adjustment Board MUNICIPAL SERVICE TAXING UNIT (M.S.T.U.) 004-102 COUNTY ATTORNEY -ELECTRIC ISSUES 004-104 NORTH COUNTY AQUATIC CENTER 004-105 GIFFORD AQUATIC CENTER 004-108 RECREATION 004-115 INTERGENERATIONAL FACILITY 004-116 OCEAN RESCUE 004-161 SHOOTING RANGE 004-204. PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT 004-205 COUNTY PLANNING 004-207 CODE ENFORCEMENT 004-210 PARKS 004-214 ROADS AND BRIDGES 004-234 TELECOMMUNICATIONS 004-400 TAX COLLECTOR 19-0651 Attachments: MSTU MSTU Budget Overview: • Ad valorem tax roll - 6.97% increase, $727,798 in additional revenues • Millage rate - 1. 1506, an increase of 7.2% from last fiscal year • Transfers Out - $5,483,872 to fund Transportation; $21,001,420 to fund Law Enforcement which is a $1,832,195 increase when compared to last year. • Telecommunications joining IT Fund and Parks Conservation Lands joining General Fund - $931,836 reduction • Facility Deferred Maintenance and Capital - $266,000 Indian River County Florida P?ge 6 Board of County Commissioners Meeting Minutes - Draft July 17, 2019 Increased Health Insurance Costs - $62,340 Net Increase of two (2) full-time positions - $105,594 Administrator Brown recommendations for Municipal Service Taxing Unit Departments (MSTU): • County Attorney/Florida Municipal Power Agency - -0-, a decrease of ($3,465) or (100%) • North County Aquatic Center - $1,140,506, an increase of $288,919 or 3.9% • Gifford Aquatic Center - $427,177, a decrease of ($58,163) or (12.0%) • Recreation - $985,482, a decrease of ($38,519) or (3.8%) • Intergenerational Facility - $583263, an increase of $89,740 or 18.2% • Ocean Rescue - $866,266, a decrease of ($34,677) or (3.8%) • Shooting Range - $779,793, an increase of $107,920 or 16.1%, • Community Development - $261,741, an increase of $4,941 or 1.9% • County Planning - $1,240,306, an increase of $7,929 or 0.06% • Code Enforcement - $506,597, a decrease of ($15,661) or (3%) • Parks - -0- moving to General Fund • Roads and Bridges - -0-, ($133,275), or (100%) • Telecommunications -0- moved to the IT Fund • Tax Collector - $80,000, same as last year; budget has not been submitted and is not due until August 1, 2019 Total for M.S.T.U. Departments was $6,890,861, a decrease of ($608,529) or (8.1%) Administrator Brown continued his presentation of the Budget, and provided an overview of the M.S.T.U. Budget expenses by department, as well as the fund millage history. There was an increase in the Millage rate of 7.2% from last fiscal year. Commissioner Zorc commented that the revenues received from the Aquatic Centers were only about 20% of the operating costs. Administrator Brown responded that the pools do not pay for themselves and need to be subsidized bythe taxpayers. The North County Aquatic Center was at 39.6% of the operating costs, and Gifford Aquatic Center was at 18% of the operating costs. Commissioner O'Bryan mentioned that the audio sound system at the Intergenerational Center was not adequate and questioned whether there were funds allocated to upgrade the sound system. Mike Zito, Assistant County Administrator, replied that the center used portable speakers for the sound system and they should be adequate, but he would do an assessment and get back to Administrator Brown. Indian River County Florida 18ge 7 Board of County Commissioners Meeting Minutes - Draft July 17, 2019 Chairman Solari commented about how the aquatic centers, conservation lands and parks were beneficial for the community. The Chairman opened the floor for public comments; there were none. TRANSPORTATION FUND 111-214 ROADS AND BRIDGES 111-243 PUBLIC WORKS 111-244 COUNTY ENGINEERING 111-245 TRAFFIC ENGINEERING 111-281 STORMWATER 19-0652 Attachments: Transportation Fund Transportation Fund Budget Overview: • Staffing increase - Three (3) full-time positions, $159,883 • Increased Health Insurance Costs - $171,420 • Increase in Engineering Fees effective March 1, 2019 - $210,000 increased revenue Administrator recommendations for Transportation Departments: • Road and Bridge - $8,585,978, a decrease of ($603,167) or (6.6%) • Public Works - $362,756, a decrease of ($11,004) or (2.9%) • County Engineering - $2,943,260, an increase of $197,473 or 7.2% • Traffic Engineering - $2,676,292, an increase of $86,155 or 3.3% • Stormwater - $1,078,028, an increase of $72,438 or 7.2% • Total Transportation Departments was $15,646,314, a decrease of ($258,095) or (1.6%) Administrator Brown explained that included in the Transportation Fund Budget was an additional full-time position at Osprey Park to help maintain the Stormwater Park that recently opened, a full-time position in Traffic Engineering, and an increase in the Health Insurance Cost in the amount of $171,420.00. He concluded that the Board approved an increase in Engineering fees effective March 1, 2019, and the increased revenues of $210,000, would help offset the costs. Indian River County Florida l9ge 8 Board of County Commissioners Meeting Minutes - Draft July 17, 2019 The Chairman opened the floor for public comments; there were none. EMERGENCY SERVICES DISTRICT 114-120 FIRE RESCUE 19-0653 Attachments: Emergency Services District Emergency Services District Budget Overview: • Ad valorem tax roll - 7.14% increase, generating $2,280,599 in additional revenues • Millage rate - 2.3655, no change from last fiscal year • Staffing Increase - 13.5 full-time positions, $1,090,570 • Increased Health Insurance Costs - $338,700 • Budgeted ALS charges increasing $150,000 or 2.6% Administrator recommendations for Emergency Services District Expenses for 2019/20_ • Salaries - $20,802,429, an increase of $720,770 or 3.6% • Benefits - $10,790,623, an increase of $841,720 or 8.5% • Operating - $6,088,420, an increase of $326,548 or 5.7% • Hydrant Maintenance - $149,551, an increase of $551 or 0.4% • Capital - $2,169,250, a decrease of ($2,251,231) or (50.9%) • Other Users - $2,189,188, an increase of $996,666 or 83.6% • State Forestry - $13,822, or 0.0% remained the same Administrator Brown announced that the proposed budget total for the Emergency Services District (ESD) was $42,203,283, an increase of $635,024 or 1.5%. He continued that the Ad valorem tax roll has a 7.14% increase, generating $2,280,599 in additional revenue; however, the millage rate would remain the same from last year even though the County added three new fire stations, and 13.5 full-time positions including a Fire Chief position with half of their salary from the Emergency Services District fund. Commissioner Flescher questioned if there was funding in the budget for Station 7. Administrator Brown explained that there was funding for Station 7 and Station 15, currently housed in modular buildings, until the County can acquire land to build Station .7 and Station 15. The Chairman opened the floor for public comments.. John O'Connor, 2076 35th Avenue, President of the International Association of Firefighters Local 2201, requested an increase in the millage rate for employee retention. Indian River County Florida liege 9 Board of County Commissioners Meeting -Minutes - Draft July 17, 2019 Commissioner O'Bryan pointed out the County had increased the millage rate four times over the last five years, coinciding with the increases in the tax roll, and have significantly increased the Emergency Services Budget. Administrator Brown stated the County had some significant increases in the Emergency Services District in prior years, and agreed there were some concerns on recruitment retention, but the County was working through the collective bargaining process between management and the Union. NON -DEPARTMENTAL STATE AGENCIES 001-106 NEW HORIZONS OF THE TREASURE COAST, INC. 001-106 STATE HEALTH DEPARTMENT 001-110 TREASURE COAST REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL 001-110 IR LAGOON NATIONAL ESTUARY PROGRAM COUNCIL 001-110 DEPARTMENT OF JUVENILE JUSTICE 001-111 MEDICAID 001-252 ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL BOARD 001-901 CIRCUIT COURT ADMINISTRATION 001-901 GUARDIAN AD LITEM 001-903 VICTIM ASSISTANCE PROGRAM 001-903 STATE ATTORNEY 001-904 PUBLIC DEFENDER 001-907 MEDICAL EXAMINER 19-0654 Attachments: Non Departmental State Agencies Administrator Brown's recommendations for the Non -Departmental State Agencies: • New Horizons - $319,884, an increase of $9,309 or 3% • State Health Department - $717,155, an increase of $20,888 or 3% Indian River County Florida jape 10 Board of County Commissioners Meeting Minutes - Draft July 17, 2019 • Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council - $65,285, an increase of $1,231 or 1.9% • Indian River Lagoon National Estuary Program - $50,000, no change from current year • Department of Juvenile Justice - $400,000, a decrease of ($50,000) or (11.1 %) fund state mandate. • Medicaid - $1,309,803, an increase of $80,982 or 6.6% • Environmental Control Board - $7,033, no change from current year • Circuit Court Expenses - $387,493, a decrease of ($9,877) or (2.5%) • Guardian ad litem - $137,821, a decrease of ($15,986) or (10.4%) • Victims Assistance Program - $72,218, an increase of $3,256 or 4.7% • State Attorney - $317,525, an increase of $12,302 or 4.0% • Public Defender - $93,357, an increase of $12,866 or 16.0% • Medical Examiner - $451,906, a decrease of ($2,461) or (0.5%) • State Forestry - $13,822, no change from current year Administrator Brown gave an overview of the State Agencies pointing out that the Medical Examiner was currently housed at the Indian River State College Campus and since he was retiring, made mention that the County had been working with three (3) other counties for a permanent facility in St. Lucie County for the Guardian ad litem. The Chairman opened the floor for public comments. Chief Judge Lawrence Mirman, Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, introduced himself and thanked the Board and the Sheriff for their continued support. Miranda Hawker, Administration of the Florida Department of Health in Indian River County, complimented the Board on how hard they were working to improve public health within the County. NON -DEPARTMENTAL 001-110 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DIVISION 001-128 CHILDREN'S SERVICES 001-137 SEBASTIAN COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AREA 001-137 FELLSMERE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AREA 19-0655 Attachments: Non -Departmental Indian River County Florida Me 11 Board of County Commissioners Meeting Minutes - Draft July 17, 2019 Administrator Brown's recommendation for Non -Departmental: • Economic Development Division - $228,505, an increase of $41,255, or 22.0% • Children's Services - $2,062,611, an increase of $397,146, or 23.8% • Sebastian CRA - $221,000, an increase of $11,000, or 5.2% • Fellsmere CRA - $18,000, an increase of $6,000, or 50.0% County Administrator Brown explained there were two (2) Community Redevelopment Areas (CRA), one (1) in Sebastian and another one (1) in Fellsmere, and that the funding was based upon changes in the Ad valorem taxable value. The Chairman opened the floor for public comments. Helene Caseltine, Economic Development Director of the Indian River Chamber of Commerce, thanked the Board for their continuous support. NON-PROFIT ORGANIZATIONS 001-110 MENTAL HEALTH ASSOCIATION 001-110 UNITED AGAINST POVERTY (fka HARVEST FOOD) 001-110 211 PALM BEACHITREASURE COAST 001-110 FOR THE LOVE OF PAWS 001-206 VETERANS COUNCIL OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, INC. 19-0656 Attachments: Non -Profit Organizations Administrator Brown's recommendations for Non -Profit Organizations: • Mental Health Association - $23,843, an increase of $422 or 1.8% • United Against Poverty - $10,642, an increase of $189 or 1.8% • 211 Palm Beach and Treasure Coast - $10,642, an increase of $189 or 1.8% increase per County policy • Veterans Council - $90,000, an increase of $3,700 or 4.3% • Keep Indian River Beautiful (K.I.R.B.) - $55,454, an increase of $2,641 or 5% The Chairman opened the floor for public comments. The following individuals thanked the Board for their support: Indian River County Florida fie 12 Board of County Commissioners Meeting Minutes - Draft July 17, 2019 Angela Guzenski, Chief Operating Officer (COO) Mental Health Association Jim Romanek, Executive Director for the Veterans Council of Indian River County Lt. Colonel Curtis Holden, First Vice -President, Veterans Council of Indian River County Colleen Phillips, Community Relations Specialist for the 211 Help Line Phillip Keeling, Development Manager, United Against Poverty QUASI NON-PROFIT ORGANIZATIONS 001-110 COMMUNITY TRANSPORTATION COORDINATOR (SRA) 001-110 CTC -SRA -SENIOR SERVICES 001-110 GIFFORD YOUTH ACHIEVEMENT CENTER, INC. 001-110 PROGRESSIVE CIVIC LEAGUE OF GIFFORD 001-110 HUMANE SOCIETY OF VERO BEACH & IRC, FL., INC. 001-110 TREASURE COAST HOMELESS SERVICES COUNCIL, INC. 19-0657 Attachments: Quasi Non -Profit Organizations Administrator Brown's recommendations for Quasi -Non -Profit Organizations: • Senior Resource Association - $1,160,000, an increase of $44,200 or 4.0% • Senior Resource Association Grants - -0- remains the same, these are grants received from the State and Federal Agencies to run the GoLine and Community Coach. • Senior Resource Association Senior Services - $125,927, an increase of $2,227 or 1.8%, the County helps support Meals on Wheels and other programs, and provides matching dollars from grants received. • Gifford Youth Center - $99,601, an increase of $1,761 or 1.8% • Progressive Civic League - $12,185, -0- or no change • Humane Society - $370,547, no change • Treasure Coast Homeless Services Council - $15,270, no change The total proposed budget for Quasi -Non -Profit Organizations is $1,783,530, a decrease of $3,694,927 or (67.4%) Administrator Brown reviewed the recommendations for Quasi Non -Profit Organizations and pointed out that these organizations perform a function that the County would have to do otherwise. Indian River County Florida 14.13 Board of County Commissioners Meeting Minutes - Draft July 17, 2019 Chairman Solari mentioned the GoLine grants have not come in for this year from the State for the Senior Resource Association. County Administrator Brown stated there was no interruption of service to the GoLine bus system. The Chairman opened the floor for public comments. The following individuals thanked the Board for their support: Diamond Litty, Public Defender of the 19th Judicial Circuit Karen Diegel, CEO, Senior Resource Association The Chairman called for a recess at 10:29 a.m., and reconvened the meeting at 10:39 a.m., with all members present. DORI SLOSBERG DRIVER EDUCATION SAFETY ACT 137-110 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT 19-0658 Attachments: Dori Slosberg-Driver Education Safety Act Dori Slosberg Drivers Education Safety Act • Indian River County School District - $49,000, an increase of $1,000 or 2.1% • Reserve for Contingency - $8,000, a decrease of ($1,000) or (11.1%) LAND ACQUISITION BONDS 245-117 LAND ACQUISITION BONDS - 2004 REFERENDUM 19-0659 Attachments: Land Acquisition Bonds Land Acquisition Bond 2004 Proposed 2019/20 Budget: • Debt Service Principal - $4,298,000, an increase of $71,000 • Debt Service Interest - $120,649, a decrease of ($70,168) • Other Debt Service Costs - $10,000, no change • Property Appraiser - $70,454, an increase of $6,045 • Tax Collector - $52,000, no change • Cash Forward - $0, a decrease of ($140,000) Administrator Brown announced that the proposed budget for Land Acquisition Bonds was $4,551,103, a decrease from last current year of ($133,123). The millage rate is 0.2568, a decrease of (0.0259) or (9.1%). Indian River County Florida Me 14 Board of County Commissioners Meeting Minutes - Draft July 17, 2019 Administrator Brown explained these are the bonds that were approved by the voters in 2004 to acquire historic and agricultural lands for conservation. Commissioner Zorc inquired when the bonds would reach maturity; Administrator Brown replied the Bonds would reach maturity in 2021. The Chairman opened the floor for public comments; there were none. STREETLIGHTING DISTRICTS. 179 OCEANSIDE 180 OSLO PARK LE:ii �e 10103 711 182 LAURELWOOD 183 ROCKRIDGE 184 VERO HIGHLANDS 186 PORPOISE POINT 187 SINGLE STREET LIGHTS 188 LAUREL COURT 189 TIERRA LINDA 190 VERO SHORES 191 IXORA PARK 192 ROYAL POINCIANA 193 ROSELAND ROAD 194 WHISPERING PINES 195 MOORINGS 196 WALKER'S GLEN 197 GLENDALE LAKES 198 FLORALTON BEACH Indian River County Florida 15 Board of County Commissioners Meeting Minutes - Draft July 17, 2019 199 WEST WABASSO 19-0660 Attachments: Streetlighting Districts Vice Chairman Susan Adams announced the following proposed assessment rates per parcel/acre: • Gifford $23.00 • Laurelwood $36.00 • RockRidge $7.00 • Vero Highlands $36.00 • Porpoise Point $10.00 • Laurel Court $39.00 • Tierra Linda $39.00 • Vero Shores $24.00 • Ixora Park $20.00 • Royal Poinciana $39.00 • Roseland Road $1.00 • Whispering Pines $16.00 • Moorings $9.00 • Walker's Glen $20.00 • Glendale Lakes $40.00 • Floralton Beach $46.00 • West Wabasso $21.00 • Oceanside* $51.00 • Oslo Park* $15.68 *Per Lot Charge Commissioner O'Bryan pointed out that the rate for Oslo Park was being reduced because the residents chose to be taxed for the installation of the lights, leaving only the electricity to be paid. The Chairman opened the floor for public comments; there were none. OTHER M.S.B.U. 171 EAST GIFFORD STORMWATER M.S.B.U. 179 OCEANSIDE STREET PAVING M.S.B.U. 185 VERO LAKE ESTATES M.S.B.U. Indian River County Florida Ile 16 Board of County Commissioners Meeting Minutes - Draft July 17, 2019 19-0661 Attachments: Other M.S.B.U. Other M.S.B.U.'s • Vero Lake Estates - $50.00, per parcel acre, no change • East Gifford Stormwater - $10.00, per parcel acre, no change • Oceanside Street Paving - $415.00, per lot charge, no change Budget Director Kristen Daniels stated that there were no proposed rate changes per parcel/acre for Vero Lake Estates, East Gifford Stormwater, or Oceanside Street Paving. The Chairman opened the floor for public comments; there were none. ENTERPRISE FUNDS 418-221 GOLF COURSE MAINTENANCE 91-11►4crilme /111:3 `._[11MI-N 441-233 BUILDING DEPARTMENT 471-218 UTILITIES - WASTEWATER TREATMENT 471-219 UTILITIES - WATER PRODUCTION 471-235 UTILITIES - GENERAL & ENGINEERING 471-257 UTILITIES - SLUDGE OPERATIONS 471-265 UTILITIES - CUSTOMER SERVICE 471-268 UTILITIES - WASTEWATER COLLECTION 471-269 UTILITIES - WATER DISTRIBUTION 471-282 UTILITIES - OSPREY MARSH 471-292 UTILITIES - SPOONBILL MARSH 472-235 UTILITY IMPACT FEES 19-0662 Attachments: Enterprise Funds Indian River County Florida fj Re 17 Board of County Commissioners Meeting Minutes - Draft July 17, 2019 Administrator Brown listed the following proposed Enterprise Funds: • Golf Course - $3,105,394, an increase of $119,332 • Building Department - $5,041,993, an increase of $395,760 • Utilities- $48,518,774, an increase of $1,409,296 • Utilities - Impact Fees - $2,519,925, an increase of $333,500 The proposed total for the Enterprise fund is $59,186,086, an increase of $2,257,888 Administrator Brown stated the Enterprise Funds were funds that were operating more as a private business and the operations were intended to pay for themselves without the use of taxpayers' dollars. He explained that the Building Department Fund had an increase for an additional position and to implement a new and more efficient permitting software system. He added that the Utilities Department increase is due to adding an additional treatment to reduce the nutrients and to meet the advance waste water treatment standards. Administrator Brown commented that Utility -Impact Fees are based upon the early pay off the of 2009 Bonds Consumer Pricing Index (CPI). Staff was not recommending a CPI adjustment this year. Administrator Brown, in response to the Commissioners Zorc's suggestion of direct hire employees' verses private provider employees, noted that the construction industry has its ups and downs and using a private provider is a better choice than hire direct as far as down times, however, the cost would be lower for in-house employees. The Chairman opened the floor to public comments; there were none. INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS 501 1 FLEET MANAGEMENT 502 1 RISK MANAGEMENT (SELF INSURANCE) 504 EMPLOYEE HEALTH INSURANCE 505-103 IT - GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS 505-234 IT - TELECOMMUNICATIONS 505-241 IT - COMPUTER SERVICES 19-0663 Indian River County Florida f9e 18 Board of County Commissioners Meeting Minutes - Draft July 17, 2019 Attachments: Internal Services Funds Budget Director Kristin Daniels listed the following proposed Internal Service Funds: • Fleet Management - $4,027,893, an increase of $364,847 • Risk Management - $5,725,125, an increase of $856,752 • Employee Health Insurance - $24,257,774, an increase of $2,510,353 • GIS/Information Technology - $3,216,933, an increase of $1,043,418 The proposed total for the Internal Service Fund is $37,227,725, an increase of $4,775,370 Budget Director Kristin Daniels presented the Internal Service Fund and gave an explanation for the increase. Regarding Fleet Management Director Daniels explained an additional mechanic position was added along with a necessary repair to replace the canopy for the fleet fuel island. She mentioned there was a significant increase in Risk Management Workers Compensation Insurance and Employee Health Insurance premiums, and that the GIS/Information Technology was now being added to this fund. The Chairman opened the floor to public comments; there were none. 1:30 P.M. (PUBLIC HEARING) SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL DISTRICT (S.W.D.D.) PROOF OF PUBLICATION OF ADVERTISEMENT FOR HEARING IS ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD. The Board of County Commissioners reconvened as the Board of the Commissioners of the Solid Waste Disposal District. The minutes will be approved at an upcoming Solid Waste Disposal District meeting. County Administrator Jason Brown stated the Solid Waste Disposal District's (S)VDD) proposed budget was $17,857,578, a decrease of $4.4 million. He highlighted that the recommended budget included an additional position to assist the Director of the SWDD, and $500,000 set aside for future cell construction. Commissioner O'Bryan brought to the Board's attention a presentation made by the Utilities Department at the July 9, 2019 Board Meeting regarding the problem of contamination in the recycling containers. He continued that at the July 16, 2019 Board Meeting, the Board voted for tippage fee relief to recycling hauler Tropical Recycling for the amount of contamination coming from the County's recycling program. He was pleased that the County had implemented the educational program and code enforcement to stop the problem where the recycling was being contaminated, but he felt it was not enough. Indian River County Florida 20e 19 Board of County Commissioners Meeting Minutes - Draft July 17, 2019 Commissioner O'Bryan requested the Board's approval to add $48.60 to the proposed SWDD Assessment of $120.90 to cover six months of mandatory County -wide trash pickup beginning April 1, 2020. He felt it .was best to take corrective action now rather than wait 14 months for the next budget hearing. He continued that by adding the assessment to the proposed Budget for FY 2019/20, the increase could be added to the Truth In Millage (TRIM) Notices and still allow further discussions from now to the September 2019 Budget Hearings. Chairman Solari recapped Commissioner O'Bryan's proposal for clarification. A motion was made by Commissioner O'Bryan, seconded by Chairman Solari, to approve a charge of an additional $48.60 for mandatory garbage service for all residents in the unincorporated area of the County for six months beginning April 1, 2020. A discussion ensued on informing the public of the additional assessment and asking the Property Appraiser to include a notification of the SWDD Assessment to be mailed with the TRIM notices. A question was raised whether the provision listed in the existing service contract for mandatory County -wide garbage pickup had expired. Administrator Brown explained the provisions in the contract and suggested that for planning purposes, a proposed rate of $8.50 per month for a total of $51.00 would be advisable. Commissioner O'Bryan amended his motion and Chairman Solari amended his second, to add $51.00 to the SWDD Assessment which would cover six months of mandatory garbage pickup beginning April 1, 2020 for all residents in the unincorporated area of the County. Chairman Solari opened the public hearing. Property Appraiser Wesley S. Davis stated he would be willing to work with the Board on including a notification in the TRIM notices. There being no further speakers, the Chairman Solari closed the Public Hearing. County Attorney Dylan Reingold referred to County Administrator Brown for clarification in regards to the amended rates. Administrator Brown replied that the properties within the cities and outside the Urban Service Area would continue with the current proposed rate of $120.90 per Equivalent Residential Unit (ERU). He continued that the residents in the unincorporated areas and within the Urban Service Area, the rate would be $51.00 higher, for a total of $171.90 per ERU. Indian River County Florida 2afe 20 Board of County Commissioners Meeting Minutes - Draft July 17, 2019 Property Appraiser Wesley S. Davis requested a simplification of the proposed SWDD assessment. He suggested an across the board rate of $171.90 for all residents in the unincorporated areas of the County. He explained that using one rate during the budget workshop and hearings would ensure timely mailing of the TRIM notices as well as setting a rate ceiling for all affected residents. Should the Board decide on mandatory County -wide trash .pickup, the rates could then be lowered to reflect final negotiated rates. Commissioner O'Bryan summarized the proposed rate, amended his motion and Chairman Solari amended his second. A motion was made by Commissioner O'Bryan, seconded by Chairman Solari, to approve a proposed charge of $120.90 per Equivalent Residential Unit (ERU) for residents within the cities and $171.90 per ERU for residents in the unincorporated area of the County and within the urban service area for mandatory garbage service for six months beginning April 1, 2020. The motion carried by the following vote: Aye: 5- Solari, Adams, Flescher, O'Bryan, and Zorc 411-217 SANITARY LANDFILL 411-255 RECYCLING 19-0664 Attachments: Solid Waste Disposal District The Board of Commissioners of the Solid Waste Disposal District adjourned and reconvened as the Board of County Commissioners. CONSTITUTIONAL OFFICERS 001-600 SHERIFF, DERYL LOAR 19-0665 Attachments: Sheriff Chairman Solari stated that the Sheriffs portion of the Budget was discussed earlier and asked if there was anyone from the public who would like to speak on the Sheriffs Budget. Indian River County School Board Chairman Laura Zorc, thanked the Sheriff for including the shared cost of 21 deputies for School Resource Officers. She also thanked the Board for recognizing the importance of security and safety within the school district. Indian River County Florida 2ge 21 Board of County Commissioners Meeting Minutes - Draft July 17, 2019 MISCELLANEOUS FUNDS (Clerk's Note: Miscellaneous Funds was heard following Internal Service Funds and placed here for consistency.) 102 NEW TRAFFIC IMPROVEMENT FEES 103 ADDITIONAL IMPACT FEES 108 RENTAL ASSISTANCE 109 SECONDARY ROAD CONSTRUCTION 117 TREE ORDINANCE FINES 119 TOURIST DEVELOPMENT FUND 120 911 SURCHARGE 121 DRUG ABUSE FUND 123 IRCLHAP/SHIP 124 METRO PLAN ORGANIZATION 127 NATIVE UPLANDS ACQUISITION 128 BEACH RESTORATION 129 NEIGHBORHOOD STABILIZATION PLAN 133 FLORIDA BOATING IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 135 DISABLED ACCESS PROGRAMS 136 INTERGOVERNMENTAL GRANTS 140 COURT FACILITY SURCHARGE FUND 141 ADDITIONAL COURT COSTS 142 COURT TECHNOLOGY FUND 145 LAND ACQUISITION SERIES 2006 19-0666 Indian River County Florida 21e 22 Board of County Commissioners Meeting Minutes - Draft July 17, 2019 Attachments: Miscellaneous Funds Budget Director Kristin Daniels recommendations for Miscellaneous Funds: • New Traffic Improvement Fee - $5,152,500, a decrease of ($4,041,5000) • Additional Impact Fees - $1,686,891, a decrease of ($1,283,324) • Section 8/Rental Assistance - $2,379,195, a decrease of ($14,393) • Secondary Road Construction - $6,781,034, a decrease of ($10,119,580) • Tree Ordinance Fines - $50,000, a decrease of ($373,660) • Tourist Development Fund - $998,450, a decrease of ($1,550,000) • 911 Surcharge - $1,410,156, an increase of $93,746 • Drug Abuse Fund - $50,000, an increase of $25,000 • IRCLHAP/SHIP - $734,290, a decrease of ($199,805) • Metropolitan Planning Organization - $665,078, a decrease of ($185,434) • Native Uplands Acquisition - $240,000, an increase of $25,000 • Beach Restoration Fund - $2,119,677, a decrease of ($4,683,692) • NSP Program - -0-, a decrease of ($750,000) • Florida Boating Improvement Program - $70,000, a decrease of ($416,194) • Disabled Access Programs - $20,000, no change • Intergovernmental Grants - $686,070, a decrease of ($257,829) • Traffic Education Program - $57,000, no change • Court Facility Surcharge - $227,501, a decrease of ($116,967) • Additional Court Costs - $93,986, an increase of $57 • Court Technology Fund - $328,312, a decrease of ($147,429) • Land Acquisition - $210,000, a decrease of ($92,645) The Chairman opened the floor for the public comments. County Attorney Dylan Reingold commented in regards to the Court Cost issues, he noted that contained in the Legislative Priorities Packet from last year within the list of concerns, the County would support policies to increase the service charge fees for recording documents and instruments. DEBT SERVICE/CAPITAL PROJECTS 204 DODGER BONDS 308 CAPITAL RESERVE FUND 315 OPTIONAL ONE -CENT SALES TAX Budget Director Kristin Daniels announced the following Other Debt and Capital Funds: • Dodger Bonds - $500,000, a decrease of ($3,240,000) • Jackie Robinson Training Complex Fund - $800,000, a decrease of ($1,050,000) Indian River County Florida Ne 23 Board of County Commissioners Meeting Minutes - Draft July 17, 2019 • Optional One -Cent Sales Tax - $31,560,215, a decrease of ($12,190,295) The Chairman opened the floor for public comments; there were none. 19-0667 Attachments: Debt Service -Capital Projects The Chairman called for a recess at 11: 01 a.m., and noted that the meeting would reconvene at 1:30 p.m. with the Solid Waste Disposal District. AGGREGATE MILLAGE AGGREGATE MILLAGE RATE IS 6.1192 19-0668 Attachments: Aggregate Millage County Administrator Jason Brown stated the proposed Aggregate Millage Rate was 6.1192, a rolled back difference of 0.4260. RECAP - TOTAL PROPOSED BUDGET AND PROPOSED MILLAGE RATES Jason E. Brown, County Administrator 19-0669 Attachments: Total proposed Budget and Millage Rates Administrator Brown requested a motion to Adopt Proposed Millage Rates. Chairman Solari responded there were no proposed changes that would impact the millage rates budget, and it was proper to have a motion to adopt the proposed millage rates. A motion was made by Commissioner Flescher, seconded by Commissioner O'Bryan, to approve the proposed General Fund Millage Rate of 3.5475 for Fiscal Year 2019/2020. The motion carried by the following vote: Aye: 5 - Solari, Adams, Flescher, O'Bryan, and Zorc A motion was made by Commissioner Flescher, seconded by Commissioner O'Bryan, to approve the proposed Municipal Service Taxing Unit (M.S.T.U.) Indian River County Florida 2aje 24 Board of County Commissioners Meeting Minutes - Draft July 17, 2019 Millage rate of 1.1506 for Fiscal Year 2019/2020. The motion carried by the following vote: Aye: 5 - Solari, Adams, Flescher, O'Bryan, and Zorc A motion was made by Commissioner Flescher, seconded by Commissioner O'Bryan, to approve the proposed Transportation Fund of $17,616,405 for the Fiscal Year 2019/2020. The motion carried by the following vote: Aye: 5 - Solari, Adams, Flescher, O'Bryan, and Zorc A motion was made by Commissioner Flescher, seconded by Commissioner O'Bryan, to approve the Emergency Services District proposed Millage rate of 2.3655 for the Fiscal Year 2019/2020. The motion carried by the following vote: Aye: 5 - Solari, Adams, Flescher, O'Bryan, and Zorc A motion was made by Commissioner Flescher, seconded by Commissioner O'Bryan, to approve the Land Acquisition 2004.Referendum proposed Millage rate of 0.2568 for an Aggregate Millage rate of 6.1192 for the Fiscal Year 2019/2020. The motion carried by the following vote: Aye: 5 - Solari, Adams, Flescher, O'Bryan, and Zorc A motion was made by Commissioner Flescher, seconded by Commissioner O'Bryan, to approve the Total proposed Budget of $367,725,135 for Fiscal Year 2019/2020. The motion carried by the following vote: Aye: 5 - Solari, Adams, Flescher, O'Bryan, and Zorc ADJOURNMENT Chairman Solari announced that there would be the Preliminary Budget Hearing on September 11, 2019 at 5:01 p.m. in the BCC Chambers, and the Final Budget Hearing would be on September 28, 2019 at 5:01 p.m. in the BCC Chambers. There being no further business, the meeting adjourned at 1:58 p.m. Indian River County Florida Me 25 Indian River County Florida Indian River County Administration Complex 1801 27th Street, Building A Vero Beach, Florida, 32960-3388 www. ircgov. com Meeting Minutes - Draft Wednesday, September 11, 2019 MITdIa N Tentative Budget Hearing and Proposed Millage Rates Commission Chambers Board of County Commissioners Bob Solari, Chairman, District 5 Susan Adams, Vice Chairman, District 1 Joseph E. Flescher, District 2 Peter D. O'Bryan, District 4 Tim Zorc, District 3 Jason E. Brown, County Administrator Dylan Reingold, County Attorney Jeffrey R. Smith, Clerk of the Circuit Court and Comptroller Jacqueline Rizzo, Deputy Clerk 27 Board of County Commissioners Meeting Minutes - Draft September 11, 2019 1. CALL TO ORDER Present: 5 - Chairman Bob Solari . Vice Chairman Susan Adams Commissioner Joseph Flescher Commissioner Peter O'Bryan Commissioner Tim Zorc 2. A. A MOMENT OF SILENT REFLECTION FOR FIRST RESPONDERS 2. B. INVOCATION Commissioner Joseph E. Flescher 3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Commissioner Tim Zorc 4. BUDGET OVERVIEW BY COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR, JASON E. BROWN County Administrator Jason Brown provided a brief overview of the proposed 2019/2020 Budget. He announced that the total proposed budget was $367,725,135 and went over the significant items impacting the budget. He explained that there was a proposed increase in the rate for the Solid Waste Disposal District (SWDD) Assessment for County -wide mandatory garbage pickup. He added that the Board, at their August Board Meeting, decided not to move forward with mandatory garbage pickup; therefore, the SWDD rate would be the lower proposed rate of $120.90, instead of the $171.90. Chairman Solari reviewed the individual Ad Valorem Funds and opened the floor for public comments. Linda Masterson, 106 Blue Heron Way, referred to the increase of $451,000 for conservation lands in the General Fund and questioned what fund was it transferred from originally. Administrator Brown stated the $451,000 in Conservation Lands Funds was transferred from the Municipal Service Taxing Funds. He determined that the funds were more appropriately housed in the General Fund since all residents in the County have the ability to access the Conservation Lands. Indian River County Florida 2Nge 1 Board of County Commissioners Meeting Minutes - Draft September 11, 2019 19-0798 Budget Ad 2019-20 Attachments: Budget Ad 2019-20 19-0799 Budget Ad Quarter page Attachments: Budget Ad quarter page budget increase 19-0800 Total Proposed Budget Attachments: Total proposed Budget and Millage Rates 19-0801 Taxing District Summary Attachments: Taxing District Summary 5. AD VALOREM FUNDS 5. A. Ad Valorem Millage and Ad Valorem Budget (Read each fund separately and make motion for each fund after public input). General Fund 19-0804 Proposed millage is 3.5475 and is 7.97% above rollback rate of 3.2856. The proposed budget is $98,852,233. Attachments: General Fund Open for public comments. The Chairman invited public comments; there were none. Consider any proposed changes to tentative budget. Make a motion to adopt the tentative millage. A motion was made by Commissioner O'Bryan, seconded by Commissioner Flescher, to adopt the tentative millage rate of 3.5475, 7.97% above the rolled back rate of 3.2856, for the General Fund. The motion carried by the following vote: Aye: 5 - Chairman Solari, Vice Chairman Adams, Commissioner Flescher, Commissioner O'Bryan, and Commissioner Zorc Indian River County Florida nge 2 Board of County Commissioners Meeting Minutes - Draft September 11, 2019 Make a motion to adopt the tentative budget. A motion was made by Commissioner Flescher, seconded by Commissioner Zorc, to adopt the tentative budget for the General Fund in the amount of $98,852,233. The motion carried by the following vote: Aye: 5 - Chairman Solari, Vice Chairman Adams, Commissioner Flescher, Commissioner O'Bryan, and Commissioner Zorc M.S.T.U. 19-0805 Proposed millage is 1.1506 and is 12.31% above rollback rate of 1.0245. The proposed budget is $34,416,707. Attachments: MSTU Open for public comments. The Chairman invited public comments; there were none. Consider any proposed changes to tentative budget. Make a motion to adopt the tentative millage. A motion was made by Commissioner Flescher, seconded by Commissioner O'Bryan, to adopt the tentative millage rate of 1.1506, 12.31% above the rolled -back rate of 1.0245, for the Municipal Service Taxing Unit. The motion carried by the following vote: Aye: 5 - Chairman Solari, Vice Chairman Adams, Commissioner Flescher, Commissioner O'Bryan, and Commissioner Zorc Make a motion to adopt the tentative budget. A motion was made by Commissioner O'Bryan, seconded by Commissioner Flescher, to adopt the tentative budget for the Municipal Service Taxing Unit in the amount of $34,416,707. The motion carried by the following vote: Aye: 5 - Chairman Solari, Vice Chairman Adams, Commissioner Flescher, Commissioner O'Bryan, and Commissioner Zorc Transportation Fund (No Millage) 19-0806 Proposed budget is $17,616,405. Attachments: Transportation Indian River County Florida _"ge 3 Board of County Commissioners Meeting Minutes - Draft September 11, 2019 Open for public comments. The Chairman invited public comments; there were none. Consider any proposed changes to tentative budget. Make a motion to adopt the tentative budget. A motion was made by Commissioner O'Bryan, seconded by Vice Chairman Adams, to adopt the tentative budget for the Transportation Fund of $17,616,405. The motion carried by the following vote: Aye: 5 - Chairman Solari, Vice Chairman Adams, Commissioner Flescher, Commissioner O'Bryan, and Commissioner Zorc Emergency Services District 19-0809 Proposed millage is 2.3655 and is 5.22% above rollback rate of 2.2481. The proposed budget is $42,203,283. Attachments: Emergency Services District Open for public comments. The Chairman invited public comments; there were none. Consider any proposed changes to tentative budget. Make a motion to adopt the tentative millage. A motion was made by Commissioner Flescher, seconded by Vice Chairman Adams, to adopt the -tentative millage rate of 2.3655, 5.22% above the rolled back rate of 2.2481 for the Emergency Services District. The motion carried by the following vote: Aye: 5 - Chairman Solari, Vice Chairman Adams, Commissioner Flescher, Commissioner O'Bryan, and Commissioner Zorc Make a motion to adopt the tentative budget. A motion was made by Commissioner O'Bryan, seconded by Commissioner Flescher, to adopt the tentative budget for the Emergency Services District, in the amount of $42,203,283. The motion carried by the following vote: Aye: 5 - Chairman Solari, Vice Chairman Adams, Commissioner Flescher, Commissioner O'Bryan, and Commissioner Zorc Land Acquisition Bonds --2004 Referendum Indian River County Florida Mge 4 Board of County Commissioners Meeting Minutes - Draft September 11, 2019 19-0810 Proposed millage is 0.2568 (rollback rate does not apply) and proposed budget amount is $4,551,103. Attachments: Land Acquisition Bonds Open for public comments. The Chairman invited public comments; there were none. Consider any proposed changes to tentative budget. Make a motion to adopt the tentative millage. A motion was made by Commissioner O'Bryan, seconded by Commissioner Flescher, to adopt the tentative millage rate of 0.2568, noting that the rolled back rate does not apply for the Land Acquisition Bonds 2004 Referendum. The motion carried by the following vote: Aye: 5 - Chairman Solari, Vice Chairman Adams, Commissioner Flescher, Commissioner O'Bryan, and Commissioner Zorc Make a motion to adopt the tentative budget. Aggregate A motion was made by Commissioner Flescher, seconded by Vice Chairman Adams, to adopt the tentative budget for the Land Acquisition Bonds 2004 Referendum in the amount of $4,551,103. The motion carried by the following vote: Aye: 5 - Chairman Solari, Vice Chairman Adams, Commissioner Flescher, Commissioner O'Bryan, and Commissioner Zorc Chairman Solari announced the proposed aggregate millage rate is 6.1192, and is 7.48% above the rolled -back rate of 5.6932. 19-0811 Proposed millage is 6.1192 and is 7.48% above rollback rate of 5.6932. Attachments: Aggregate Millage 6. INDIAN RIVER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS SITTING AS SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL DISTRICT BOARD Solid Waste Disposal District Budget (Non -Ad Valorem special District) Indian River County Florida nge 5 Board of County Commissioners Meeting Minutes - Draft September 11, 2019 19-0812 Solid Waste Disposal District Attachments: Solid Waste Disposal District The Board of County Commissioners reconvened as the Board of Commissioners of the Solid Waste Disposal District. 6. A. Announce 2019/2020 Proposed Charge and Budget. 1. $75.56 per Residential Waste Generation Unit ($120.90/flouse) (3.5% increase from current year) $42.00 per Commercial Waste Generation Unit (3.7% increase from current year) Readiness -to -Use Fee $24.69 (0.4% increase from current year) 2. $16,237,578 Budget Commissioner O'Bryan received confirmation from County Administrator Jason Brown that these proposed rates were the original rates before the Board voted to increase the rates for mandatory garbage pickup. Commissioner O'Bryan thanked the Board for their support and consideration of the County -wide mandatory garbage pickup. 6. B. Receive comments from the Public. The Chairman invited public comments; there were none 6. C. Consider any Proposed Amendments. Indian River County Florida "ge 6 Board of County Commissioners Meeting Minutes - Draft September 11, 2019 6. D. Make a motion to adopt tentative non -ad valorem assessment rates. A motion was made by Commissioner O'Bryan, seconded by Commissioner Flescher to adopt the Non -Ad Valorem assessment rates of $75.56 per Residential Waste Generation Unit; $42.00 per Commercial Waste Generation Unit; and Readiness -to -Use Fee of $24.69, for the Solid Waste Disposal District (SWDD). The motion carried by the following vote: Aye: 5 - Chairman Solari, Vice Chairman Adams, Commissioner Flescher, Commissioner O'Bryan, and Commissioner Zorc 6. E. Make a motion to adopt tentative budget. A motion was made by Commissioner Zorc, seconded by Vice Chairman Adams, to adopt the tentative budget for the Solid Waste Disposal District in the amount of $16,237,578. The motion carried by the following vote: Aye: 5 - Chairman Solari, Vice Chairman Adams, Commissioner Flescher, Commissioner O'Bryan, and Commissioner Zorc The Board of Commissioner adjourned the Solid Waste Disposal District meeting, and reconvened as the Board of County Commissioners of the Budget hearing meeting, continuing with the adoption of Non -Ad Valorem Assessment Charges. 7. ADOPTION OF NON -AD VALOREM ASSESSMENT CHARGES 7. A. Announce 2019/2020 proposed charge for each Non -Ad Valorem Assessment District Vice Chairman Adams read the proposed charge for each Non -Ad Valorem Assessment District into the record. The Chairman invited public comments; there were none. 19-0828 Other MSBU Attachments: Other M.S.B.U. 19-0827 Other MSBU and Streetlighting Districts Attachments: Other MSBU and Streetlighting Districts 7. B. Consider any Proposed Amendments and Calculate Revised Charge Indian River County Florida _T4ge 7 Board of County Commissioners Meeting Minutes - Draft September 11, 2019 7. C. Make a motion to adopt Tentative Charge A motion was made by Commissioner O'Bryan, seconded by Commissioner Flescher, to adopt the tentative charges read into the record for each of the Non -Ad Valorem Assessment Districts. The motion carried by the following vote: Aye: 5 - Chairman Solari, Vice Chairman Adams, Commissioner Flescher, Commissioner O'Bryan, and Commissioner Zorc 8. APPROVE NON -AD VALOREM DOLLAR BUDGETS 8. A. Announce 2019/2020 proposed budget 19-0830 Non -Ad Valorem Dollar Budgets Attachments: Non -Ad Valorem Dollar Budgets 19-0831 Miscellaneous funds Attachments: Miscellaneous Funds 19-0832 Debt Service Attachments: Debt Service -Capital Proiects 8. B. Consider any Proposed Amendments The Chairman invited public comments. Linda Masterson, 106 Blue Heron Way, asked if there were any contingencies to work on the beach restoration after Hurricane Dorian under Beach Restoration Fund. Administrator Brown explained the preliminary estimate from the beach erosion damage caused by Hurricane Dorian was about $7,000,000 and the County was pursuing FEMA reimbursement. He added that the County was moving forward with the Sector 5 Project Beach and Dune Restoration Project to increase the quantity of sand and restore losses from Hurricane Dorian. 8. C. Make a motion to adopt tentative budget A motion was made by Commissioner Flescher, seconded by Vice Chairman Adams, to adopt the budget for the Special Revenue Funds for $24,573,800; Debt Service Funds $500,000; Capital Project Funds $32,360,215; Enterprise Funds $59,186,086; and Internal Service Funds $37,227,725. The motion carried by the following vote: Aye: 5 - Chairman Solari, Vice Chairman Adams, Commissioner Flescher, Commissioner O'Bryan, and Commissioner Zorc Indian River County Florida '"ge 8 Board of County Commissioners Meeting Minutes - Draft September 11, 2019 9. ANNOUNCE TIME AND PLACE OF FINAL BUDGET HEARING Final Budget Hearing will be held at 5:01 P.M. on Wednesday, September 18, 2019 at the County Administration building A, Commission Chambers, 1801 27th St, Vero Beach, Florida Chairman Solari read the details of the meeting into the record. 10. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, the Chairman adjourned the meeting at 5:29 p.m. Indian River County Florida _"ge 9 Indian River County Florida Indian River County Administration Complex 1801 27th Street, Building A Vero Beach, Florida, 32960-3388 www. ircgov. com Meeting Minutes - Draft Wednesday, September 18, 2019 5:01 PM Final Budget Hearing to Adopt Budget and Millage Rates Commission Chambers Board of County Commissioners Bob Solari, Chairman, District 5 Susan Adams, Vice Chairman, District 1 Joseph E. Flescher, District 2 Peter D. O'Bryan, District 4 Tim Zorc, District 3 Jason E. Brown, County Administrator Dylan Reingold, County Attorney Jeffrey R. Smith, Clerk of the Circuit Court and Comptroller Jacqueline Rizzo, Deputy Clerk G.C. 37 Board of County Commissioners Meeting Minutes - Draft 1. CALL TO ORDER 2. Rollcall Present: 5 - Chairman Bob Solari Vice Chairman Susan Adams Commissioner Joseph Flescher Commissioner Peter O'Bryan Commissioner Tim Zorc 2. A. A MOMENT OF SILENT REFLECTION FOR FIRST RESPONDERS 2. B. INVOCATION Susan Adams, Vice Chairman 3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Peter D. O'Bryan 4. BUDGET OVERVIEW BY COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR. JASON E. BROWN September 18, 2019 County Administrator Jason Brown provided a brief overview of the proposed 2019/2020 Budget. He announced that the total proposed budget was $367,725,135 and went over the significant items impacting the budget. He explained that there was a proposed increase in the rate for the Solid Waste Disposal District (SWDD) Assessment for County -wide mandatory garbage pickup. He added that the Board at their August Board Meeting, decided not to move forward with mandatory garbage pickup; therefore, the SWDD rate would be the lower proposed rate of $120.90, instead of the $171.90. Chairman Solari opened the floor for public comments; there were none. A. 19-0891 Budget Ad Attachments: Budget Ad B. 19-0892 Budget Ad Quarter page Attachments: Budget Ad Quarter page Indian River County Florida _"ge 1 Board of County Commissioners Meeting Minutes - Draft September 18, 2019 C. 19-0893 Total Proposed Budget Attachments: Total Proposed Budget D. 19-0894 Taxing District Summary Attachments: Taxing District Summary 5. AD VALOREM FUNDS A. Ad Valorem Millage and Ad Valorem Budget (Read each fund separately and make motion for each fund after public input). General Fund B. 19-0879 Proposed millage is 3.5475 and is 7.97% above rollback rate of 3.2856. The proposed budget is $98,852,233. Attachments: RESOLUTIONS - General Fund Chairman Solari presented the General Fund Budget. - Open for public comments. Chairman Solari opened the floor for public comments. Lou Aprile, St. Vincent DePaul Thrift Store, explained they help individuals pay their utility bills and provide motel rooms for the homeless. Since they are constantly being referred to by the EOC and the Treasure Coast Homeless Council, he questioned whether these organizations receive funds from the County. County Administrator Brown responded the Treasure Coast Homeless Council does receive funds from the County through the General Fund and receives various federal grants passed through the County. Typically the money is designated for rent assistance, but there are provisions for utilities in some programs. - Consider any proposed changes to budget. Indian River County Florida 39ge 2 Board of County Commissioners Meeting Minutes - Draft September 18, 2019 - Make a motion to approve the millage rate and adopt millage resolution. A motion was made by Commissioner O'Bryan, seconded by Vice Chairman Adams, to approve the millage rate of 3.5475 for the General Fund, 7.97% above the rollback rate of 3.2856, and to approve Resolution 2019-076, establishing the tax millage rate to be levied upon all real and personal taxable property in Indian River County, Florida, for Fiscal Year 2019/2020 for the General Fund. The motion carried by the following vote: Aye: 5 - Chairman Solari, Vice Chairman Adams, Commissioner Flescher, Commissioner O'Bryan, and Commissioner Zorc - Make a motion to approve dollar amount and adopt budget resolution. A motion was made by Commissioner Flescher, seconded by Vice Chairman Adams, to approve the General Fund Budget in the amount of $98,852,233, and Resolution 2019-077, amending the County Budget Officer's estimates of receipts other than taxes and of balances to be brought forward for Fiscal Year 2019/2020 and adopting a final budget for the General Funds. The motion carried by the following vote: Aye: 5 - Chairman Solari, Vice Chairman Adams, Commissioner Flescher, Commissioner O'Bryan, and Commissioner Zorc M.S.T.U. C. 19-0880 Proposed millage is 1.1506 and is 12.31% above rollback rate of 1.0245. The proposed budget is $34,416,707. Attachments: RESOLUTIONS - MSTU - Open for public comments. Chairman Solari opened the floor for public comments; there were none. - Consider any proposed changes to budget. - Make a motion to approve the millage rate and adopt millage resolution. A motion was made by Commissioner O'Bryan, seconded by Commissioner Flescher, to approve the millage rate 1.1506 for the Municipal Service Taxing Unit (MSTU), 12.31% above the rollback rate of 1.0245, and to approve Resolution 2018-078, establishing the tax millage rate to be levied upon all real and personal taxable property in Indian River County, Florida, for Fiscal Year 2019/2020 for the Indian River County General Purpose Municipal Service Taxing Unit. The motion carried by the following vote: Aye: 5 - Chairman Solari, Vice Chairman Adams, Commissioner Flescher, Commissioner O'Bryan, and Commissioner Zorc Indian River County Florida 40ge 3 Board of County Commissioners Meeting Minutes - Draft September 18, 2019 - Make a motion to approve dollar amount and adopt budget resolution. Chairman Solari presented the budget for the M.S.T.U.. The Chairman opened the floor for public comments; there were none. A motion was made by Commissioner Flescher, seconded by Vice Chairman Adams, to approve the budget in the amount of $34,416,707, and to approve Resolution 2019-079, amending the County Budget Officer's estimates of receipts other than taxes and of balances to be brought forward for Fiscal Year 2019/2020 and adopting a final budget for the Indian River County General Purpose Municipal Service Taxing Unit. The motion carried by the following vote: Aye: 5 - Chairman Solari, Vice Chairman Adams, Commissioner Flescher, Commissioner O'Bryan, and Commissioner Zorc Transportation Fund (No Millage) D. 19-0881 Proposed budget is $17,616,405. Attachments: RESOLUTIONS - transportation - Open for public comments. Chairman Solari presented the proposed budget for the Transportation Fund. Chairman Solari opened the floor for public comments. Joan Johnson, Coral Winds Subdivision, mentioned that her husband Bob Johnson attended the County Board meetings for over twenty years and joked about the gas tax. She thanked the Board for being courteous and respectful to him. - Consider any proposed changes to budget. - Make a motion to approve the dollar amount and adopt budget resolution. A motion was made by Commissioner O'Bryan, seconded by Vice Chairman Adams, to approve the budget in the amount of $17,616,405, for the Transportation Fund, and to approve Resolution 2019-080, amending the County Budget Officer's estimates of receipts other than taxes and of balances to be brought forward for Fiscal Year 2019/2020 and adopting a final budget for the Transportation Fund. The motion carried by the following vote: Aye: 5- Chairman Solari, Vice Chairman Adams, Commissioner Flescher, Commissioner O'Bryan, and Commissioner Zorc Indian River County Florida ftge 4 Board of County Commissioners Meeting Minutes - Draft September 18, 2019 Emergency Services District E. 19-0882 Proposed millage is 2.3655 and is 5.22% above rollback rate of 2.2481. The proposed budget is $42,203,283. Attachments: RESOLUTIONS - ESD - Open for public comments. Chairman Solari opened the floor for public comments; there were none. - Consider any proposed changes to tentative budget. - Make a motion to approve the millage rate and adopt millage resolution. Chairman Solari presented the proposed budget for the Emergency Services District. The Chairman opened the floor for public comments; there were none. A motion was made by Commissioner Flescher, seconded by Commissioner Zorc, to approve the millage rate of 2.3655 for the Emergency Services District, which is 5.22% above the rollback rate of 2.2481, and to approve Resolution 2019-081, establishing the tax millage rate to be levied upon all real and personal taxable property in Indian River County, Florida, for Fiscal Year 2019/2020 for the Indian River County Emergency Services District. The motion carried by the following vote: Aye: 5 - Chairman Solari, Vice Chairman Adams, Commissioner Flescher, Commissioner O'Bryan, and Commissioner Zorc - Make a motion to approve dollar amount and adopt budget resolution. A motion was made by Commissioner Flescher, seconded by Commissioner O'Bryan, to approve the dollar amount of $42,203,283, for the Emergency Services District, and to approve Resolution 2019-082, amending the County Budget Officer's estimates of receipts other than taxes and of balances to be brought forward for Fiscal Year 2019/2020 and adopting a final budget for the Emergency Services District. The motion carried by the following vote: Aye: 5- Chairman Solari, Vice Chairman Adams, Commissioner Flescher, Commissioner O'Bryan, and Commissioner Zorc Land Acquisition Bonds --2004 Referendum Indian River County Florida 42ge 5 Board of County Commissioners . Meeting Minutes -Draft September 18, 2019 F. 19-0884 Proposed millage is 0.2568 (rollback rate does not apply) and proposed budget amount is $4,551,103. Attachments: RESOLUTIONS - land aca - Open for public comments. Chairman Solari opened the floor for public comments; there were none. - Consider any proposed changes to tentative budget. - Make a motion to approve the millage rate and adopt millage resolution. A motion was made by Commissioner O'Bryan, seconded by Commissioner Flescher, to approve the millage rate the Land Acquisitions Bonds -2004 Referendum, of 0.2568, (rollback rate does not apply), and to approve Resolution 2019-083, establishing the tax millage rate to be levied upon all real and personal taxable property in Indian River County, Florida, for Fiscal Year 2019/2020 for the General Obligation Land Acquisition Bond Issue — 2004 Referendum. The motion carried by the following vote: Aye: 5 Chairman Solari, Vice Chairman Adams, Commissioner Flescher, Commissioner O'Bryan, and Commissioner Zorc - Make a motion to approve dollar amount and adopt budget resolution. Aggregate A motion was made by Commissioner Zorc, seconded by Commissioner Flescher, to approve the budget of $4,551,103 for the Land Acquisition Bonds 2004 -Referendum, and approved Resolution 2019-084, amending the County Budget Officer's estimates of receipts other than taxes and of balances to be brought forward for Fiscal Year 2019/20209 and adopting a final budget for the General Obligation Land Acquisition Bond Issue — 2004 Referendum. The motion carried by the following vote: Aye: 5 - Chairman Solari, Vice Chairman Adams, Commissioner Flescher, Commissioner O'Bryan, and Commissioner Zorc Chairman Solari announced the proposed aggregate millage rate of 6.1192, and is 7.48% above the rollback rate. No Action Taken or Required Proposed millage is 6.1192 and is 7.48% above rollback rate of 5.6932. 6. INDIAN RIVER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS SITTING AS SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL DISTRICT BOARD Solid Waste Disposal District Budget (Non -Ad Valorem Special District) Indian River County Florida #3ge 6 Board of County Commissioners Meeting Minutes - Draft September 18, 2019 The Board of County Commissioners reconvened as the Board of Commissioners of the Solid Waste Disposal District (SWDD). Those minutes will be approved at the upcoming SWDD meeting. A. 19-0885 Announce 2019/2020 Proposed Charge and Budget. Attachments: RESOLUTIONS - SWDD 1. $75.56 per Residential Waste Generation Unit ($120.90/House) (3.5% increase from current year) $42.00 per Commercial Waste Generation Unit (3.7% increase from current year) Readiness -to -Use Fee $24.69 (0.4% increase from current year) 2. $16,237,578 Budget - Receive comments from the Public. Chairman Solari opened the floor for public comments; there were no speakers and the Chairman closed the public comments session. Chairman Solari brought up the extra $51 that appeared on the Trim Notice and questioned if the other Commissioners received any comments from the public. The Commissioners & Administrator Brown mentioned they received very. few comments after the initial notice, and since the charge had been dismissed, no comments had been received from the public. - Consider any Proposed Amendments. Indian River County Florida 4P4ge 7 Board of County Commissioners Meeting Minutes - Draft September 18, 2019 - Make a motion to adopt a resolution to approve non -ad valorem Residential and Commercial Waste Generation Unit Charge and Readiness -to -Use Fee. A motion was made by Commissioner O'Bryan, seconded by Commissioner Flescher, to approve the Non -Ad Valorem assessment rates of $75.56 per Residential Waste Generation Unit ($120.90/House), a 3.5% increase from current year; $42.00 per Commercial Waste Generation Unit, a 3.7% increase from current year; and Readiness to Use Fee of $24.69, a 4.0% increase from current year, for the Solid Waste Disposal District(SWDD); and to approve Resolution 2019-085, establishing the assessment rate to be levied upon all real taxable property in Indian River County, Florida, for Fiscal Year 2019/2020 for the Solid Waste Disposal District. The motion carried by the following vote: Aye: 5- Chairman Solari, Vice Chairman Adams, Commissioner Flescher, Commissioner O'Bryan, and Commissioner Zorc - Make a motion to adopt budget resolution. A motion was made by Commissioner O'Bryan, seconded by Commissioner Flescher, to approve the Solid Waste Disposal District (SWDD) budget of $16,237,578, and approve Resolution 2019-086, amending the County Budget Officer's estimates of receipts other than taxes and of balances to be brought forward for Fiscal Year 2019-2020 and adopting a final budget for the Solid Waste Disposal District. The motion carried by the following vote: Aye: 5 - Chairman Solari, Vice Chairman Adams, Commissioner Flescher, Commissioner O'Bryan, and Commissioner Zorc 7. ADOPTION OF NON -AD VALOREM ASSESSMENT CHARGES Vice Chairman Adams presented the Street Lighting District. 7. A. 19-0886 Announce 2019/2020 proposed charge for each Non -Ad Valorem Assessment District Attachments: RESOLUTIONS - MSBU STREETLIGHTS M.S.B.U. • Vero Lake Estates • East Gifford Stormwater • Oceanside Street Paving Street Lighting Districts • Gifford Charge per Parcel Acre/Lot $50.00 per parcel /acre $10.00 per parcel/acre $415.00 per lot $23.00 per parcel/acre Indian River County Florida 43ge 8 Board of County Commissioners Meeting Minutes - Draft • Laurelwood $36.00 per parcel/acre • Rockridge $ 7.00 per parcel/acre • Vero Highlands $36.00 per parcel/acre • Porpoise Point $10.00 per parcel/acre • Laurel Court $39.00 per parcel/acre • Tierra Linda $39.00 per parcel/acre • Vero Shores $24.00 per parcel/acre • Ixora Park $20.00 per parcel/acre • Royal Poinciana $39.00 per parcel/acre • Roseland $ 1.00 per parcel/acre • Whispering Pines $16.00 per parcel/acre • Moorings $ 9.00 per parcel/acre • Walker's Glen $20.00 per parcel/acre • Glendale Lakes $40.00 per parcel/acre • Floralton Beach $46.00 per parcel/acre • West Wabasso $21.00 per parcel/acre • Oceanside $51.00 per lot • Oslo Park $15.68 per lot - Receive comments from the public Chairman Solari opened the floor for public comments; there were none. - Consider any Proposed Amendments and Calculate Revised Charge September 18, 2019 Indian River County Florida Mge 9 Board of County Commissioners Meeting Minutes - Draft September 18, 2019 - Make a motion to adopt a resolution to approve the Non -Ad Valorem Assessment charges. Vice Chairman Adams presented the 2019-2020 proposed charge for each Non -Ad Valorem Assessment District. Chairman Solari invited public comments; there were none. He closed the public comments session. A motion was made by Vice Chairman Adams, seconded by Commissioner Zorc, to approve the charges read into the record for each of the Non -Ad Valorem Assessment Districts, and to approve Resolution 2019-087, establishing the assessment rates to be levied upon certain real property in Indian River County for Fiscal Year 2019/2020 for all the Non Ad Valorem assessments. The motion carried by the following vote: Aye: 5 - Chairman Solari, Vice Chairman Adams, Commissioner Flescher, Commissioner O'Bryan, and Commissioner Zorc 8. APPROVE NON -AD VALOREM DOLLAR BUDGETS 8.A. 19-0887 Announce 2019/2020 Proposed Budget Attachments: RESOLUTIONS - NON TAXING FUNDS - Receive comments from the public Chairman Solari opened the floor for public comments; there were none. • Special Revenue Funds $24,573,800 • Other Debt Service Funds $ 500,000 • Capital Projects $32,360,215 • Enterprise Funds $59,186,086 • Internal Service Funds $37,227,725 - Consider any Proposed Amendments Chairman Solari opened the floor for public comments; there were none. Indian River County Florida 4SPe 10 Board of County Commissioners Meeting Minutes - Draft September 18, 2019 - Make a motion to adopt budget resolution. 9. ADJOURNMENT Chairman Solari opened the floor for public comments; there were none. A motion was made by Commissioner Flescher, seconded by Commissioner Zorc, to approve the Other Special Revenue Funds in the amount of $24,573,800; Other Debt Service Funds in the amount of $500,000; Capital Project Funds in the amount of $32,360,215; Enterprise Funds in the amount of $59,186,086; and Internal Service Funds in the amount of $37,227,725, and to approve Resolution 2019-088, adopting a final budget for the Fiscal Year 2019/2020 for certain Non Taxing Funds of Indian River County. The motion carried by the following vote: There being no further business, the Chairman adjourned the meeting at 5:26 p.m. Indian River County Florida 40e 11 Indian River County Florida * * Meeting Minutes �ORIO� Board of County Commissioners Bob Solari, Chairman, District 5 Susan Adams, Vice Chairman, District 1 Joseph E. Flescher, District 2 Peter D. O'Bryan, District 4 Tim Zorc, District 3 Tuesday, August 13, 2019 1. CALL TO ORDER Jason E. Brown, County Administrator Dylan Reingold, County Attorney Jeffrey R. Smith, Clerk of the Circuit Court and Comptroller 9:00 AM 2.A. A MOMENT OF SILENT REFLECTION FOR FIRST RESPONDERS 2.B. 'INVOCATION Rev. Timothy Womack, First Presbyterian Church of Vero Beach 3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Jason E. Brown 4. ADDITIONS/DELETIONS TO THE AGENDA / EMERGENCY ITEMS Indian River County Administration Complex 1801 27th Street, Building A Vero Beach, Florida, 32960-3388 www.ircgov.com Commission Chambers Added: 13.F. Attorney's Matters -Agriculture Advisory Committee Appointment Moved: Item 5.C. to be heard following Item 5.A. Moved: Item 14.13.1. to be heard following Item 5.D. A motion was made by Commissioner O'Bryan, seconded by Vice Chairman Adams, to approve the Agenda as amended. The motion carried by the following vote: Aye: 4 - Solari, Adams, O'Bryan, and Zorc Absent: 1 - Flescher 5. PROCLAMATIONS and PRESENTATIONS 5.A. Presentation of Indian River County Appropriations Check by Senator Debbie Mayfield And Representative Erin Grall State Representative Erin Grall appeared on behalf of State Senator Debbie Mayfield to present the Board with Appropriations checks for Indian River County. The money would fund two local projects: the North Relief Canal Aquatic Plant Indian River County Florida 49ge 1 Board of County Commissioners Meeting Minutes 4 August 13, 2019 and the North Sebastian Septic to Sewer Phase II conversion. County Administrator Jason Brown mentioned the September 5, 2019 grand opening of the Osprey Acres Stormwater Park and Nature Preserve which was funded with previously procured Appropriations money. Presented 5.B. Presentation of Proclamation Honoring Doris Roy on Her Retirement From Indian River County Board of County Commissioners Office of the County Administrator with Thirty- Five Years of Service Commissioner Solari read and presented the Proclamation honoring Doris (Dori) Roy on her retirement from Indian River County with 35 years of service. The Commissioners and staff each in turn praised Ms. Roy on her competence, knowledge, and helpfulness. The following speakers appeared before the Board with accolades for Ms. Roy: Joe Baird, former County Administrator Joseph Paladin, Black Swan Consulting Jeffrey R. Smith, Clerk of the Circuit Court and Comptroller Alma Lee Loy, "First Lady" of Vero Beach Penny Chandler, former President and CEO of the Indian River County Chamber of Commerce Ms. Roy was joined by members of her family as she thanked all the well-wishers. Read and Presented 5.C. Presentation of Proclamation Honoring Smokey Bear in Indian River County, (Clerk's Note: This item was heard following Item 5.A., but is placed here for continuity.) Commissioner Zorc read and presented the Proclamation to Smokey Bear in honor of his 75th Birthday. Melissa Yunas and Brian Torres, representing the Florida Forest Service, spoke of the importance of fire safety education and thanked several local partners in the community. Read and Presented 6. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 6.A. Regular Meeting of June 4, 2019 Approved 6.B. Regular Meeting of June 11, 2019 Indian River County Florida _"ge 2 Board of County Commissioners Meeting Minutes 4 August 13, 2019 A motion was made by Commissioner O'Bryan, seconded by Vice Chairman Adams, to approve the Regular Meeting Minutes of June 4, 2019 and June 11, 2019, as written. The motion carried by the following vote: Aye: 4 - Solari, Adams, O'Bryan, and Zorc Absent: 1 - Flescher 7. INFORMATION ITEMS FROM STAFF OR COMMISSIONERS NOT REQUIRING BOARD ACTION 7.A. City of Fellsmere Ordinance 2019-03, Voluntary Annexation of +/- 12.655 Acres, is on file for review in the Office of the Clerk to the Board. No Action Taken or Required 73. Florida Public Service Commission, Order NO. PSC -2019 -0288 -CO -EI, petition for approval of optional supplemental power services pilot program and rider by Florida Power and Light Company, is on file in the Office of Clerk to the Board. No Action Taken or Required 7.C. Florida Public Service Commission Agenda for Tuesday, August 6, 2019, 9:30 a.m., a copy of the agenda is on file in the Office of the Clerk. No Action Taken or Required 7.D. Florida Public Service Commission Consummating Order PSC -2019 -0298 -CO -EQ. Petition for approval of renewable energy tariff and standard offer contract, by Florida Power and Light Company, is on file in the Office of the Clerk. No Action Taken or Required 7.E. Proof of Publication of Unclaimed Monies for Cash Bonds Deposited with the Clerk of the Circuit Court prior to January 1, 2018 is on file in the Office of the Clerk to the Board. No Action Taken or Required 7.F. Letter of Support for Bethel Creek for Lagoon Research Project No Action Taken or Required 7.G. Indian River County Venue Event Calendar Review No Action Taken or Required 7.H. Letter regarding new Florida Department of Environmental Protection rules on biosolids No Action Taken or Required Indian River County Florida nge 3 Board of County Commissioners Meeting Minutes 4 August 13, 2019 7.1. Update On All Aboard FL Expenses No Action Taken or Required 7.J. 3rd Quarter FY 2018/2019 Budget Report No Action Taken or Required 7.K. Government Finance Officers Association awarding Indian River County GFOA's Distinguished Budget Presentation Award for the 2018-19 Budget Chairman Solari thanked and congratulated Management and Budget Director Kristin Daniels and her staff for this award. Director Daniels thanked the Board for the recognition. No Action Taken or Required 7.L. Department of Economic Opportunity (DEO) Florida Job Growth Public Infrastructure Grant 2019 No Action Taken or Required 7.M. Letter of Thanks from Laura (Riding) Jackson Foundation Board No Action Taken or Required 7.N. Landfill Closure and Collection Service Changes for the Labor Day Holiday No Action Taken or Required 8. CONSENT AGENDA A motion was made by Commissioner O'Bryan, seconded by Commissioner Zorc, to approve the Consent Agenda as presented. The motion carried by the following vote: Aye: 4- Solari, Adams, O'Bryan, and Zorc Absent: 1 - Flescher 8.A. Checks and Electronic Payments July 5, 2019 to July 11, 2019 Approved 8.B. Checks and Electronic Payments July 12, 2019 to July 18, 2019 Approved 8.C. . Checks and Electronic Payments July 19, 2019 to July 25, 2019 Approved Indian River County Florida 52ge 4 Board of County Commissioners Meeting Minutes 4 August 13, 2019 8.D. Checks and Electronic Payments July 26, 2019 to August 1, 2019 Approved 8.E. Acceptance and Approval of Expenditures of Emergency Management Federally -Funded Subgrant Agreement (EMPG) Agreement Number: G0002 Approved staffs recommendation 8.F. Approval of Renewal for a Class "E" Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity for Senior Resource Association to Provide Wheelchair Services Approved staffs recommendation 8.G. Invitation from John's Island Golf Club for Staff to Participate in a "Public Safety Day" Golf Outing Approved staffs recommendation 8.H. OL73RD LLC's Request for Final Plat Approval for a Subdivision to be known as Orchid Landing [SD -04-02-08 / 2003010063-83225] Approved staffs recommendation 8.1. MG Heine Vero, LLC's Request for Final Plat Approval for Bridgehampton Residential Subdivision [SD -16-05-01 / 2002100165-83140] Approved staffs recommendation 8.J. Consideration of the Indian River County SHIP Program 2019 Annual Report Approved staffs recommendation 8. K. Vero 53 Landings, LLC's Request for Final Plat Approval to Replat Parcel "A", Lot 3, and Tract 1 of The Landings Commercial Subdivision [SD -18-02-04 / 98060121-81957] Approved staffs recommendation 8.L. Applicant's Request for Final PD Plat Approval for the Replat of Lot 2, Lot 3, and Tract A of the Hampton Woods East PD Residential Subdivision [PD -19-07-04 / 95050141-84781] Approved staffs recommendation 8.M. Resolutions Cancelling Taxes on Properties Acquired by Indian River County for Public Purposes Approved Resolution 2019-060 (Crouch), Resolution 2019-061 (Primax Properties), and Resolution 2019-062 (ldlette), cancelling certain taxes upon publicly owned lands, pursuant to Section 196.28, Florida Statutes. Indian River County Florida 53ge 5 Board of County Commissioners Meeting Minutes 4 August 13, 2019 8.N. Jones' Pier Conservation Area Public Use Improvements - Hazard Mitigation Assistance - Donadio & Associates, Architects, P.A. - Work Order No. 1 Approved staffs recommendation 8.0. Award of Bid No: 2019064 Interior Painting at the North County and Main Approved staffs recommendation 8.P. Approval of Work Order No. 1 - Edlund, Dritenbas, Binkley Architects & Associates, P.A. - Kroegel Homestead Conservation Area Restroom Design and Engineering Approved staffs recommendation 8.Q. Approval of Vending Service Agreement Approved staffs recommendation 8.R. Facility Lease Agreement with Vero Beach Foundation Gators Football & Cheer Corporation Approved staffs recommendation 8.S. 2020 Holiday Schedule Approved staffs recommendation 8.T. Health Insurance Additional Health Advocacy Benefit effective August 1, 2019 Approved staffs recommendation 8.U. Miscellaneous Budget Amendment 013 Approved Resolution 2019-063, amending the Fiscal Year 2018-2019 Budget. 8.V. Request to Transfer Florida Department of Health Assets to Indian River County Hospital District Approved staffs recommendation 8.W. Ranking of Firms for RFP 2019060 - FEMA Public Assistance Consulting Services Approved staffs recommendation with the final ranking of firms being: 1) Witt O'Brien's, LLC; 2) Aptim Environmental & Infrastructure, LLC; 3) Vanir Construction Management, Inc.; and 4) Culpepper & Terpening. 8.X. Approval of Annual Contracts for Motor and Pump Repair (RFP 201905 6) Approved staffs recommendation Indian River County Florida 54ge 6 Board of County Commissioners Meeting Minutes 4 August 13, 2019 8.Y. Authorization to Resolicit Concession Services at County Recreation Facilities Approved staffs recommendation 82. Work Order No. 8, REI Engineers, Inc. - IRC Courthouse Parking Garage and Seal Replacement (IRC -1801) Approved staffs recommendation 8.AA. Work Order No. 4, Environmental Science Associates, Jungle Trail Shoreline Stabilization Project (IRC -1823) Approved staffs recommendation 83B. US Highway 1 Landscaping - South County Line to Oslo Road (IRC -1631) Release of Retainage and Change Order No. 1 Approved staffs recommendation 8.CC. Amendment No. 1 to Work Order No. 7, MBV Engineering, Inc., North County Offices at Sebastian Corners Approved staffs recommendation 8.DD. Right -of -Way Acquisition - 66th Avenue Widening Project Owner: Eugene M. Eichelberger 6700 65th Street, Vero Beach, FL 32967 Approved staffs recommendation 8.EE. Facilities Use Agreement - St. Lucie County's Harbour Pointe Artificial Reef Deployments 2019 Approved staffs recommendation 8.FF. Notice of Grant Application for Funding Assistance from State of Florida Beach Erosion Control Program - FY 2020/21 Approved Resolution 2019-064, requesting assistance from the State of Florida Beach Erosion Control Program - FY 2020121. 8.GG. Agreement for Access and Sand Renourishment to Sexton, Inc. Beach Area Approved staffs recommendation 8.HH. Work Order No. 2018007-3, Coastal Technology Corporation, Sector 7 Beach and Dune Re -nourishment - Reconnaissance Survey Approved staffs recommendation 8.11. Work Order No. 2018006-6, APTIM, Sector 3 Beach and Dune Re -nourishment —Reconnaissance Survey Indian River County Florida 5;3ge 7 Board of County Commissioners Meeting Minutes 4 August 13, 2019 Approved staffs recommendation 8.JJ. Work Order No. 19 with Kimley-Horn and Associates - Roseland Elevated Tank Conversion Approved staffs recommendation 8.KK. Request to Waive the Bid Process for the Replacement of Blowers for the Sludge Holding Tank at West Regional Wastewater Treatment Facility Approved staffs recommendation 8. LL. Fourth Amendment to Collateral Development Agreement Related to Jackie Robinson Training Complex Approved staffs recommendation 8.MM. Out of County Travel to attend the Florida Shore & Beach Preservation Association 62nd Annual Conference Approved staffs recommendation 9. CONSTITUTIONAL OFFICERS and GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES 9.A. Indian River County Sheriff Deryl Loar: Requesting to use proceeds resulting from sale of surplus property and vehicles to acquire new like -kind property within the current fiscal year pursuant to Chapter 274, Florida Statutes. Indian River County Sheriff Deryl Loar thanked the Board for their support of the move to online auctions. A motion was made by Commissioner O'Bryan, seconded by Vice Chairman Adams, to approve the request from Indian River County Sheriff Deryl Loar to use net auction proceeds in the amount of $96,627.00 for the acquisition of new, like -kind property within the current fiscal year. The motion carried by the following vote: Aye: 4 - Solari, Adams, O'Bryan, and Zorc Absent: 1 - Flescher 10. PUBLIC ITEMS A. PUBLIC HEARINGS PROOF OF PUBLICATION FOR THESE HEARINGS IS ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD. 10.A.1. Stoneridge, LLC Request to Rezone f 19.24 Acres from RS -3 to RS -6. Located south of 65th Street, west of Lateral "G" Canal, and east of 48th Indian River County Florida 5tge 8 Board of County Commissioners Meeting Minutes 4 August 13, 2019 Avenue. (RZON 2004110052-83770) [Quasi -Judicial] Chairman Solari introduced the parties for the proceeding as Indian River County and Stoneridge, LLC. Each Commissioner, as requested by the Chairman, disclosed ex parte communications, site visits, or independent investigations. The Commissioners also affirmed that they have an open mind and can base their decisions on the evidence presented and the applicable law. The Deputy Clerk administered the Oath to all persons who wished to speak at the hearing. Bill Schutt, Chief of Long Range Planning, and Roland DeBlois, Community Development Director, appeared before the Board with Stoneridge, LLC's rezoning request. Chief Schutt's PowerPoint presentation included a review of existing land use, zoning requirements, concurrency and consistency regulations, and concluded with staffs recommendation to adopt the Ordinance approving the rezoning request. The Chairman opened the Public Hearing. Joseph Paladin, Black Swan Consulting, appeared before the Board as the representative for Stoneridge, LLC. Mr. Paladin explained the reasons for the rezoning request and provided details of the proposed housing development. He requested the Board's approval and made himself available for questions. Commissioner O'Bryan asked and received answers regarding the final density of the development. There being no further speakers, the Chairman closed the Public Hearing. A motion was made by Commissioner O'Bryan, seconded by Vice Chairman Adams, to adopt Ordinance 2019-017, amending the Zoning Ordinance and the accompanying Zoning Map for approximately ±19.24 acres located south of 65th Street, west of Lateral "G" canal, and east of 48th Avenue from RS -3, Single-family Residential District (Up to 3 units/acre), to RS -6, Single-family Residential District (Up to 6 units/acre), and providing codification, severability, and effective date. The motion carried by the following vote: Aye: 4 - Solari, Adams, O'Bryan, and Zorc Absent: 1 - Flescher 10.A.2. Florida Power & Light Company's Request for Major Site Plan and Special Exception Use Approval for a Private Heavy Utility (Orange Blossom Solar Energy Center) [SP -SE -19-06-17 / 2019020003-84142] (Quasi -Judicial) Chairman Solari introduced the parties for the proceeding as Indian River County and Florida Power and Light (FPL). Indian River County Florida 57ge 9 Board of County Commissioners Meeting Minutes 4 August 13, 2019 Each Commissioner, as requested by the Chairman, disclosed ex parte communications, site visits, or independent investigations. The Commissioners also affirmed that they have an open mind and can base their decisions on the evidence presented and the applicable law. The Deputy Clerk administered the Oath to all persons who wished to speak at the hearing. The Chairman opened the Public Hearing. Ryan Sweeney, Senior Planner, appeared before the Board with a PowerPoint presentation describing the major site plan and special exception process needed for the proposed Orange Blossom Solar Energy Center. He continued with the site plan map, Planning and Zoning recommendations, and staffs approval with landscape and project route conditions. Commissioner O'Bryan received confirmation that the energy center's capacity would be low enough to exempt it from the requirements of the Electrical Power Plant Siting Act. Bart Gaetjens, FPL External Affairs Manager, requested the Board's approval and thanked staff for their assistance. Melanie Roger, FPL Project Manager, appeared before the Board with a presentation on FPL's solar energy program. She noted this would be the second solar energy center in Indian River County, and spoke of the benefits of solar energy. The Board asked and received answers from Ms. Roger regarding battery storage and the performance of existing solar centers in Indian River County. James Kelley, Indian River County resident, received information regarding the benefits of solar power to consumers. There being no further speakers, the Chairman closed the Public Hearing. A motion was made by Commissioner O'Bryan, seconded by Vice Chairman Adams, to approve staffs recommendation. The motion carried by the following vote: Aye: 4 - Solari, Adams, O'Bryan, and Zorc Absent: 1 - Flescher B. PUBLIC DISCUSSION ITEMS 10.8.1. Request to Speak from Nicole Knowles Regarding Reduction or Removal of Indian River County Florida —"e 10 Board of County Commissioners Meeting Minutes 4 August 13, 2019 Demolition Lien on Property Located at 4855 34th Avenue Nicole Knowles, 2016 2nd Street, appeared before the Board to request a reduction of the $3,584 demolition lien on her property located at 4855 34th Avenue. Roland DeBlois, Chief of Code Enforcement, recounted that the Code Enforcement Board had previously approved reducing a different code violation fine on this property; however, the demolition lien was still outstanding at a cost of $3,003.68, plus accumulated interest. Chief DeBlois reported that staff would support waiving the interest, but could not reduce the lien. Chairman Solari issued a reminder that the Board could not vote on public discussion items. Commissioner O'Bryan explained that there were tax dollars expended on the demolition which needed to be recouped, and this was the reason the lien could not be waived or reduced. He was in support of eliminating the interest, as had been done in past cases. Vice Chairman Adams supported bringing the issue back under Commissioner O'Bryan's items so that the Board could vote to waive the interest. Commissioner Zorc sought confirmation that there were no outstanding ERUs on the property. County Administrator Jason Brown stated he would have staff research that issue bring it back to the Board. No Action Taken or Required 10.6.2. Public Discussion Request from Gina Kempf re: Tunnel to Towers 5K Invitation to the Community and Board Members Gina Kempf, 835 29th Court, local director of the Tunnel to Towers (T2T) 5K Race appeared before the Board to provide information about the event scheduled for September 14, 2019. Ms. Kempf went on to detail T2T's mission and support programs for military and first responders. In response to a question by Commissioner O'Bryan, Ms. Kempf provided the website address, T2Trun.org, for more information and race registration. No Action Taken or Required 10.8.3. Public Discussion Request from Nancy Kelly re: Rename the Main Library "The Mary Denham Snyder Library" Nancy Kelly, 1015 40th Avenue, appeared before the Board with a request to rename the main library "The Mary Denham Snyder Library". Her Indian River County Florida 59ve 11 Board of County Commissioners Meeting Minutes 4 August 13, 2019 included the accomplishments of Ms. Snyder who worked to expand and improve the Indian River County Library system. A 250 -signature petition in favor of the renaming was also provided to the Board. Ann Marie Rossmell, 344 13th Place SW, spoke of Ms. Snyder's dedication to the County's library and advocated for the name change. Chairman Solari issued a reminder that the Board does not vote on public discussion items. Commissioner O'Bryan supported renaming a meeting room within the main library in honor of Ms. Snyder. No Action Taken or Required The Chairman called a recess at 10:37 a.m. and reconvened the meeting at 10:47 a.m. with Commissioner Flescher absent. C. PUBLIC NOTICE ITEMS 11. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR MATTERS I I .A. 2020 Preliminary State Legislative List of Concerns County Administrator Jason Brown introduced the 2020 Preliminary State Legislative List of Concerns. He noted the importance of the list in providing the Board with a unified voice ahead of the upcoming Florida Association of Counties (FAC) Policy Conference. Administrator Brown went on to introduce an additional legislative item regarding a property along AIA which straddled Indian River County and St. Lucie County. Because the property was split by the county line, there were concerns raised regarding access to emergency services. He described the remedy which would impact the boundary between the counties, and the complexity involved in making the change. Chairman Solari requested the addition of an item which would address Chapter 180 of the Florida Statutes. He explained that the Statute allowed municipalities like the City of Vero Beach to provide utility services to nearby unincorporated areas. The Chairman then read from a letter written by former County Attorney Alan Polackwich which detailed the potential problems of the statute, and the impact to areas of the barrier island. Discussion of Chapter 180 of the Florida Statutes ensued among the Board and County Attorney Dylan Reingold, with Commissioner O'Bryan noting possible opposition from the FAC. Chairman Solari referenced the Polackwich letter as he Indian River County Florida We 12 Board of County Commissioners Meeting Minutes 4 August 13, 2019 directed Attorney Reingold to research the County's legal position on the statute. A motion was made by Commissioner O'Bryan, seconded by Chairman Solari, to have the Chairman and the County Attorney work in collaboration to add modification of Chapter 180 of the Florida Statutes to the County's 2020 State Legislative List of Concerns. The motion carried by the following vote: Aye: 4 - Solari, Adams, O'Bryan, and Zorc Absent: 1 - Flescher A motion was made by Commissioner O'Bryan, seconded by Vice Chairman Adams, to adopt the 2020 Preliminary State Legislative List of Concerns, with the addition of an item addressing the redraw of Indian River County's boundary with St. Lucie County. The motion carried by the following vote: Aye: 4 - Solari, Adams, O'Bryan, and Zorc Absent: 1 - Flescher I I .B. City of Sebastian Annexation County Administrator Jason Brown brought forth for discussion the City of Sebastian's (the City) Petition for Voluntary Annexation of a portion of land owned by the Graves Brothers Company. He stressed that timing was of the essence since the annexation issue was scheduled for a final public hearing before the City Council on August 28, 2019. Administrator Brown referenced County staffs memo written to the City detailing concerns regarding responsibility and capacity for water/wastewater, inconsistencies with the County's 2030 Comprehensive Plan, and the impact to the County's public works infrastructure. He then requested the Board's input on the issues as well as any recommended actions for staff. Discussion ensued among the Board members with each Commissioner stating their thoughts and positions on the various issues. There was agreement on the need for additional discussion, as well as an annexation agreement between the City and the Graves Brothers Company. The Chairman opened the discussion for public comment. Joseph Paladin, representing the Indian River Neighborhood Association (IRNA), clarified that the organization would not support the annexation without an agreement with the land owner. Brian Corrigan, 1051 Mountain Trail, cautioned against moving forward with the precedent -setting annexation absent a clear agreement regarding green space, drainage, and water usage. Indian River County Florida ffe 13 Board of County Commissioners Meeting Minutes 4 August 13, 2019 County Administrator Brown recapped the Board's direction to request having the City table the annexation pending additional communication, as well as an agreement with the Graves Brothers. Commissioner O'Bryan suggested having the Chairman draft a letter to the City stating these requests. County Attorney Dylan Reingold stated that he would act as necessary to preserve the County's legal rights in light of the possible impacts on roadways and utility services. A motion was made by Commissioner O'Bryan, seconded by Chairman Solari, to approve the following actions: 1) Authorize Chairman Solari to draft a letter requesting that the City of Sebastian table the Annexation vote while staff resolves concerns over County services; 2) Grant the County Attorney authority to preserve the rights of the County going forward; and 3) Authorize County staff to attend any meetings related to the Annexation. The motion carried by the following vote: Aye: 4- Solari, Adams, O'Bryan, and Zorc Absent: 1- Flescher 12. DEPARTMENTAL MATTERS A. Community Development B. Emergency Services C. General Services 1. Human Services 2. Sandridge Golf Club 3. Recreation D. Human Resources E. Office of Management and Budget F. Public Works 12.F.1. Award of Bid No. 2019012, Vero Lake Estates 85th Street Petition Paving from 101 st Avenue to 96th Avenue Project, IRC -1628 Public Works Director Rich Szpyrka recounted for the Board that in April 2013, the Vero Lake Estates Municipal Service Taxing Unit (MSTU) Committee provided a prioritized list of roadways that needed to be milled or paved, including the stretch of 85th Street from 96th Avenue to 101 st Avenue. Indian River County Florida Re 14 Board of County Commissioners Meeting Minutes 4 August 13, 2019 Director Szpyrka explained that millings roads, while less expensive than paved roads, degraded faster than had been projected and resulted in time-consuming, short-term fixes. Additionally, the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) did not recognize asphalt millings as a permanent driving surface which left the County without standards to evaluate their construction quality. The project was bid with a base cost for millings and an alternate cost to add paving. Given the concerns with the longevity and quality of millings roadways, staff recommended the alternate bid for paving. A motion was made by Commissioner O'Bryan, seconded by Vice Chairman Adams, to approve staffs recommendation. The motion carried by the following vote: Aye: 4 - Solari, Adams, O'Bryan, and Zorc Absent: 1 - Flescher G Utilities Services 12.6.1. North Sebastian Septic to Sewer Phase 2 Status and Direction Director of Utility Services Vincent Burke appeared before the Board with an update on the North Sebastian Septic to Sewer (S2S) Phase 2 project. He informed the Board that the County had received $500,000 which represented only one-third of the requested funding from a Legislative Appropriations grant. Using a PowerPoint presentation, Director Burke reviewed the timeline of the project to date and the area of Sebastian planned for S2S conversion and water installation. He noted that since the legislative grant was less than needed, staff sought and received approval from the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) to reduce the scope of the project from 201 parcels to 75 parcels. The presentation continued with three (3) suggestions to obtain the funding needed to cover the grant shortfall. Each scenario detailed the cost of providing sewer, water, or both services with variations on the amount of money provided by the optional sales tax fund and the County. Director Burke requested the Board's direction on whether or not to pursue the S2S conversion in reduced form, and he explained the next steps in the process should it be approved. Discussion ensued among the Commissioners on the merits of providing sewer and water to these parcels, and the responsibility of the County to fund the project. Chairman Solari stated his objections to S2S conversions, noting they were not a cost-effective way to reduce nitrogen in the Lagoon. Indian River County Florida 0.15 Board of County Commissioners Meeting Minutes 4 August 13, 2019 The following speakers appeared before the Board: Glenn Powell, 12845 Bay Street, spoke in favor of having the County invest in providing sewer and water services to North Sebastian. Fern Grounds, 2375 11th Court SW, received clarification on the County's Optional Sales Tax fund. The Board returned to discussion of the issue, and agreed to direct staff to move forward with the project. Additionally, the Commissioners approved supporting funding scenario three (3) which used money from the Optional Sales Tax fund, while staff also pursued an additional grant from the St. John's River Water Management District to offset the use of tax dollars. A motion was made by Vice Chairman Adams, seconded by Commissioner O'Bryan, to approve staffs recommendation with Funding Scenario Option 3, which used funds from the Optional Sales Tax Fund while also continuing to pursue additional grant money. The motion carried by the following vote: Aye: 3- Adams, O'Bryan, and Zorc Nay: 1 - Solari Absent: 1 - Flescher 13. COUNTY ATTORNEY MATTERS 13.A. Indian River County, St. Lucie County and Martin County Joint Board Meeting County Attorney Dylan Reingold recalled that Commissioners from Indian River, Martin, and St. Lucie Counties had attended a Joint Board meeting in 2018 during which all three Boards discussed legislative priorities for the upcoming year. Martin and St. Lucie Counties have reached out to the Board to see if there was interest in another joint meeting to discuss the shared 2020 Legislative concerns. Attorney Reingold announced the tentative date for the meeting was October 3, 2019, and noted that Florida statutes required a resolution authorizing participation. A motion was made by Commissioner O'Bryan, seconded by Vice Chairman Adams, to approve Resolution 2019-065, authorizing the Board of County Commissioners for Indian River County to participate in a joint meeting with the St. Lucie County Commission and Martin County Commission to discuss and plan matters of mutual interest; and providing for an effective date. The motion carried by the following vote: Aye: 4 - Solari, Adams, O'Bryan, and Zorc Absent: 1 - Flescher Indian River County Florida Ne 16 Board of County Commissioners Meeting Minutes 4 August 13, 2019 The Chairman called a recess at 12:03 p.m. and reconvened the meeting at 12:18 p.m. with Commissioner Flescher absent. 13.B. Interlocal Agreement with the City of Sebastian Regarding Fire Marshal Services County Attorney Dylan Reingold highlighted details from the negotiated interlocal agreement (ILA) with the City of Sebastian (the City) for Fire Marshall services. Referring to staffs memorandum of July 31, 2019, Attorney Reingold reviewed the services that would be under the City's control, insurance and indemnity provisions, and the experience requirements for newly -hired individuals. He noted that the ILA would be in effect for ten (10) years. A motion was made by Vice Chairman Adams, seconded by Commissioner Zorc, to approve staffs recommendation. The motion carried by the following vote: Aye: 3 - Adams, O'Bryan, and Zorc Nay: 1 - Solari Absent: 1 - Flescher 13.C. Acquisition of Right -Of -Way Parcel 102 for Phase II of 66th Avenue Improvements from Harris Groves, 61 st Street and 66th Avenue Deputy County Attorney William DeBraal appeared before the Board to request approval for acquisition of a portion of the Harris Groves property to be used as right-of-way in the 66th Avenue improvements. The former citrus grove is zoned A-1 Agricultural, and is currently being used as pasture land for the family's cattle business. Attorney DeBraal recounted that in 2008, the Board had offered Harris Groves $148,350 for a 3.75 acre parcel of the property, including damages and costs. When negotiations resumed in July 2017, the property owners presented their own appraisal of $646,000 for the needed portion. After further discussion, an agreement was reached for a sum of $218,500 which included the 3.75 acres, severance damages, replacement of fencing, and relocation of a dirt road. An additional $68,252 would be included for attorney's fees and costs incurred by Harris Groves. Commissioner O'Bryan expressed dismay at the steady increase of land prices along 66th Avenue, and requested a copy of the Harris Groves appraisal which was almost five -times the cost -per -acre of similar properties. Commissioner O'Bryan made a Motion to reject the settlement agreement and instead offer Harris Groves the original $148,350 from 2008 with a seven-day window for acceptance. The Motion failed for lack of a second. Indian River County Florida Oe 17 Board of County Commissioners Meeting Minutes 4 August 13, 2019 Chairman Solari and Commissioner O'Bryan agreed that an analysis of right-of-way costs would be warranted; Vice Chairman Adams also supported returning with an Agenda item to further discuss the issue. A motion was made by Vice Chairman Adams, seconded by Commissioner Zorc, to approve staffs recommendation. The motion carried by the following vote: Aye: 3 - Solari, Adams, and Zorc Nay: 1 - O'Bryan Absent: 1 - Flescher 13.D. Vaping Update County Attorney Dylan Reingold provided the Board with a follow-up to their June 18, 2019 directive to research ways to regulate vaping. Attorney Reingold compared and contrasted Florida law related to tobacco and nicotine devices, local and state ordinances, and measures implemented by Alachua County. He sought guidance from the Board on how they wished to move forward on vaping regulations. Commissioner Zorc and Attorney Reingold discussed enforcement of local ordinances, and the available options to the County regarding local licensing of retailers. Chairman Solari surmised that the real issue lay in the regulation of nicotine rather than delivery vehicles like cigarettes and vaping devices. He suggested that the State change their regulations from cigarettes and vaping devices to focus on nicotine regulation. Commissioner Zorc made a Motion to ask the State to consider nicotine regulation by adding the issue to the County's list of State Legislative priorities. UNDER DISCUSSION, chairman Solari opted to hear from the public before calling for a vote on the Motion. The following speakers addressed the Board: Kylie Savoy, 1040 10th Avenue, presented statistics on smoking and advocated for a local tobacco retail license. Pedro Bernabe, Phoenix Wellness Center, urged the Board to take the lead in local tobacco regulation. Marie Wygonic Blanchard, 1425 22nd Avenue, spoke on nicotine's impact on teenagers, and supported using the Alachua County regulations as a template for Indian River County Florida we 18 Board of County Commissioners Meeting Minutes 4 August 13, 2019 Indian River County. Following public input, Chairman Solari restated the Motion before the Board and called for the vote. A motion was made by Commissioner Zorc, seconded by Chairman Solari, to include adding State control of nicotine regulation to the 2020 State Legislative List of Concerns. The motion carried by the following vote: Aye: 4 - Solari, Adams, O'Bryan, and Zorc Absent: 1 - Flescher 13.E. Opioid Litigation Update County Attorney Dylan Reingold presented an update on the Opioid litigation as he had been directed by the Board on March 6, 2018. His report recapped the following items: consolidation of federal cases into the Multi District Litigation in the Northern District of Ohio; a plan to create a negotiating class which would obtain global settlements of the federal lawsuits; and the State of Oklahoma's civil lawsuit which was headed toward settlement. The following speakers made presentations before the Board: Attorney Cynthia Angelos, Port St. Lucie, presented statistics on the local impact of opioid use and requested that Indian River County join the negotiating class in the federal lawsuit. Attorney Michael Kahn, Melbourne, appeared on behalf of his lawgroup which represents several Florida counties and cities in the negotiating class lawsuit. He provided additional information about the lawsuit and requested Indian River County's participation as well. The Board discussed the presentations, with Chairman Solari noting that the County would need to receive a request for proposal from the law group to consider participation. Commissioner O'Bryan confirmed with Attorney Reingold that local governments would be included unless they specifically opted out. Attorney Reingold stated he did not see any urgency in the matter, but would keep the Board informed. The Board's consensus was to have the County Attorney keep the Board informed of any changes in the case. No Action Taken or Required 13Y. Agriculture Advisory Committee Appointment There was no discussion regarding this item. Indian River County Florida Me 19 Board of County Commissioners Meeting Minutes 4 August 13, 2019 A motion was made by Vice Chairman Adams, seconded by Commissioner Zorc, to appoint Anna Kirkland to fill the unexpired term for the "Associated Industry" representative to the Agriculture Advisory Committee. The motion carried by the following vote: Aye: 4 - Solari, Adams, O'Bryan, and Zorc Absent: 1 - Flescher 14. COMMISSIONERS MATTERS A. Commissioner Bob Solari, Chairman B. Commissioner Susan Adams, Vice Chairman 14.6.1. IRLNEP CCMP Resolution of Support (Clerk's Note: This item was heard following Item S.D. and is placed here for continuity.) Vice Chairman Adams requested the Board's approval of a resolution of support for the Indian River Lagoon Council's (the Council) adoption of the Indian River Lagoon National Estuary Program (IRLNEP) Comprehensive Conservation and Management Plan (CCMP). The Vice Chairman explained that all member counties of the Council were asked to pass similar resolutions as a unified show of support. Dr. Duane DeFreese, Executive Director of the Council, appeared before the Board to expound on the significance of the CCMP which provides information and a list of action items to improve the Lagoon's health. Dr. DeFreese advised that this document should be used as a master plan for staff and other organizations who are working on Lagoon -related projects. He closed by thanking the Board, County staff, and citizens for their support of the IRLNEP. A motion was made by Vice Chairman Adams, seconded by Commissioner O'Bryan, to approve Resolution 2019-066, in support for IRL Council adoption of the Indian River Lagoon National Estuary Program Comprehensive Conservation and Management Plan: "Looking Ahead to 2030". The motion carried by the following vote: Aye: 4 - Solari, Adams, O'Bryan, and Zorc Absent: 1 - Flescher C. Commissioner Joseph E. Flescher D. Commissioner Peter D. O'Bryan E. Commissioner Tim Zorc Indian River County Florida fe 20 Board of County Commissioners Meeting Minutes 4 August 13, 2019 15. SPECIAL DISTRICTS AND BOARDS A. Emergency Services District The Board of County Commissioners reconvened as the Board of Commissioners of the Emergency Services District. The minutes will be approved at an upcoming Emergency Services District meeting. 15.A.1. Approval of Minutes Meeting May 7, 2019 Approved 15.A.2. Approval of Minutes Meeting of May 21, 2019 Approved 15.A.3. Approval of Minutes Meeting June 11, 2019 A motion was made by Vice Chairman Adams, seconded by Commissioner Zorc, to approve the Emergency Services District Meeting Minutes of May 7, 2019, May 21, 2019, and June 11, 2019 as written. The motion carried by the following vote: Aye: 4 - Solari, Adams, O'Bryan, and Zorc Absent: 1 - Flescher 15.A.4. Approval of Affiliation Agreement Renewal between Health Career Institute, LLC and Indian River County Emergency Services District (Clerk's Note: This item was heard following Item 10.B.3. and is placed here for continuity.) Chief Stone was present, however there was no discussion regarding this item. A motion was made by Commissioner O'Bryan, seconded by Commissioner Zorc, to approve staffs recommendation. The motion carried by the following vote: Aye: 4 - Solari, Adams, O'Bryan, and Zorc Absent: 1 - Flescher B. Solid Waste Disposal District The Board of County Commissioners reconvened as the Board of Commissioners of the Solid Waste Disposal District. The minutes will be approved at an upcoming Solid Waste Disposal District meeting. 153.1. Final Pay to Geosyntec for Work Authorization No CCNA-2018 WO No 4 - Evaluation of Landfill Liquids Management Options Indian River County Florida 69e 21 Board of County Commissioners Meeting Minutes 4 August 13, 2019 There was no discussion regarding this item. A motion was made by Commissioner O'Bryan, seconded by Vice Chairman Adams, to approve staffs recommendation. The motion carried by the following vote: Aye: 4- Solari, Adams, O'Bryan, and Zorc Absent: 1 - Flescher 15.6.2. Final Pay to CDM Smith for CCNA 2018 Work Order No. 2 - Contamination Evaluation Plan Implementation There was no discussion regarding this item. A motion was made by Commissioner O'Bryan, seconded by Vice Chairman Adams, to approve staffs recommendation. The motion carried by the following vote: Aye: 4 - Solari, Adams, O'Bryan, and Zorc Absent: 1 - Flescher 15.6.3. Update on Potential Transition to Mandatory Garbage Collection Vincent Burke, Director of Utility Services, and Himanshu Mehta, Managing Director of the Solid Waste Disposal District (SWDD), appeared before the Board with an update to the progress made regarding the implementation of mandatory garbage service in the County. In an effort to stop the use of recycling carts for garbage, the Board voted on July 19, 2019 and July 23, 2019 to execute a provision in their contract with Waste Management to move from subscription service to mandatory/universal collection service for all County residents. Director Mehta used a PowerPoint presentation to further detail the contamination issue, the action plan implemented by SWDD, and the ramifications of having contaminated recycling loads. His presentation also recounted recent discussions with Waste Management regarding the implementation of universal collection, and concluded with staff's recommendation. The Board first discussed and clarified Waste Management's July correspondence which confirmed the contracted rate for residents inside the Urban Service Area (USA), but raised the current subscription rate for residents outside the USA. Additionally, Waste Management requested to waive or redefine negotiated items in their contract which did not expire until September 30, 2022. Discussion continued with Commissioners and staff expressing their dismay at Indian River County Florida 17,#e 22 Board of County Commissioners Meeting Minutes 4 August 13, 2019 Waste Management's rate increase for service outside the USA, as well as their requests to modify their contract at this juncture. The Board also expressed concern for the need to meet state -mandated recycling levels, the legality of Waste Management's requests, and responsibility for contamination oversight. The Chairman opened the discussion to public comment. Fern Grounds, 2375 11th Court SW, spoke in favor of mandatory garbage service in the County. Lisa McKnight, Waste Management Area Public Sector Director, addressed the Board with a prepared statement which outlined the company's issues with their existing contract and the challenges of providing universal service to the County. Members of the Board reacted to Ms. McKnight's statements and concluded the discussion when it was apparent the County and Waste Management were at an impasse. Chairman Solari called for a vote on staff's recommendation to keep the existing system and not implement mandatory pick up at this time. A motion was made by Commissioner O'Bryan, seconded by Vice Chairman Adams, to approve staffs recommendation to refrain from implementing mandatory collection until October 1, 2022. The motion carried by the following vote: ' Aye: 4 - Solari, Adams, O'Bryan, and Zorc Absent: 1 - Flescher 15.6.4. Change Order No. 5 to Thalle (Bid #2018025) Director of Utility Services Vincent Burke appeared before the Board seeking approval of Change Order Number 5 from Thalle Construction for work associated with the County landfill expansion. He noted that the additional costs would be covered by the contingency fund. A motion was made by Vice Chairman Adams, seconded by Chairman Solari, to approve staffs recommendation. The motion carried by the following vote: Aye: 4- Solari, Adams, O'Bryan, and Zorc Absent: 1 - Flescher C. Environmental Control Board 16. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, the Chairman adjourned the meeting at 1:59 p.m. Indian River County Florida Tte 23 Board of County Commissioners Meeting Minutes 4 August 13, 2019 Indian River County Florida 742e 24 INFORMATIONAL INDIAN RIVER COUNTY INTER -OFFICE MEMORANDUM OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET TO: Members of the Board of County Commissioners DATE: November 25, 2019 FROM: Kristin Daniels Director, Office of Management & Budget SUBJECT: UPDATE ON ALL ABOARD FL EXPENSES DESCRIPTION Staff is providing an update to the Board of County Commissioners on actual expenses for All Aboard Florida. Please see the attached document for expenses incurred as of 11/25/19. ATTACHED: • All Aboard Fl. expenses through 11/25/19 spreadsheet. 73 All Aboard Florida Expenses Indian River County Board approved expenses of $186,921 prior to 3/24/15 authorization 3/24/15 Litigation- Board Approved a total of $2.7 million FY 14/15 - 16/17 In addition to prior authorization 10/2/2018 Board approved additional $92,500 11/20/2018 Board aooroved additional 51 million-Budeet amendment 74 Acct#00110214033110-15023 Legal Services Date Vendor Amount Note 11/12/2019 Murphy & Walker $16,222.00 Fees for Legal Services October 2019 Subtotal Expenses FY 19/20 $16,222.00 9/30/2019 Murphy & Walker $19,290.00 Fees for Legal Services Aug & Sept 2019 9/30/2019 Bryan Cave LLP $49,142.40 Fees for Legal Services September 2019 9/30/2019 Bryan Cave LLP $7,161.12 Fees for Legal Services August 2019 9/18/2019 Bryan Cave LLP $107,257.70 Fees for Legal Services July 2019 9/11/2019 Murphy & Walker $18,912.00 Fees for Legal Services -Aug 2019 8/13/2019 Murphy & Walker $6,487.00 Fees for Legal Services June & July 2019 7/10/2019 Murphy & Walker - $13,868.00 Fees for Legal Services June 2019 6/24/2019 Bryan Cave LLP $1,244.00 Fees for Legal Services May 2019 6/12/2019 Murphy & Walker $7,939.10 Fees for Legal Services May 2019 5/29/2019 Bryan Cave LLP $65,848.60 Fees for Legal Services April 2019 5/15/2019 Murphy & Walker $2,656.50 Fees for Legal Services April 2019 5/14/2019 Bryan Cave LLP $75,490.34 Fees for Legal Services March 2019 4/4/2019 Murphy & Walker $8,042.00 Fees for Legal Services March 2019 - 3/26/2019 Bryan Cave LLP $59,154.08 Fees for Legal Services February 2019 3/18/2019 Murphy & Walker $15,988.70 Fees for Legal Service -February 2019 3/18/2019 Bryan Cave LLP $3,577.26 Fees for Legal Service -January 2019 2/21/2019 Murphy & Walker $13,539.54 Fees for Legal Service -January 2019 2/5/2019 Bryan Cave LLP $9,938.49 Fees for Legal Service -December 2018 1/4/2019 Murphy & Walker $9,929.00 Fees for Legal Service -December 2018 12/27/2018 Bryan Cave LLP $26,535.95 Fees for Legal Service -November 2018 12/5/2018 MCDermot,W111 & Emery LLP $10,000.00 IRC Legislative Advocacy Matters -through 10/31/18 12/3/2018 Bryan Cave LLP $16,416.20 Fees for Legal Service -October 2018 Subtotal Expenses FY 18/19 $548,417.98 9/30/2018 McDermot,Will & Emery LLP $10,565.97 IRC Legislative Advocacy Matters -through 9/30/18 9/30/2018 McOermot,Will & Emery LLP $10,000.00 IRC Legislative Advocacy Matters -through 8/31/18 9/30/2018 Bryan Cave LLP $72,352.66 Fees for Legal Service -Sept 2018 9/30/2018 Bryan Cave LLP $60,392.05 Fees for Legal Service -Aug 2018 9/10/2018 Bryan Cave LLP $109,699.89 Fees for Legal Service -July 2018 8/24/2018 McDermot,Will & Emery LLP $10,000.00 IRC Legislative Advocacy Matters- 5/11-7/30/18 8/8/2018 Bryan Cave LLP $49,360.27 Fees for Legal Service -June 2018 7/18/2018 McDermot,Will & Emery LLP $10,000.00 IRC Legislative Advocacy Matters- 4/18-4/20/18 7/17/2018 Bryan Cave LLP $14,257.36 Fees for Legal Services -May 2018 7/2/2018 McDermot,Will & Emery LLP $10,012.00 IRC Legislative Advocacy Matters- 4/6-4/20/18 6/13/2018 Bryan Cave LLP $30,148.74 Fees for Legal Services -April 2018 5/29/2018 McDermot,Will & Emery LLP $10,000.00 IRC Legislative Advocacy Matters- 2/27-4/5/18 5/15/2018 Bryan Cave LLP $23,853.70 Fees for Legal Services -March 2018 5/7/2018 McDermot,Will & Emery LLP $10,000.00 IRC Legislative Advocacy Matters- 2/14-27/18 4/9/2018 Bryan Cave LLP $56,189.09 Fees for Legal Services -Feb 2018 4/9/2018 MCDermot,W111 & Emery LLP _ $10,000.00 IRC Legislative Advocacy Matters-Jan/Feb 3/14/2018 Bryan Cave LLP $58,782.89 Fees for Legal Services -Jan 2018 3/7/2018 McDermot,Will & Emery LLP $10,000.00 IRC Legislative Advocacy Matters-Dec/Jan 2/20/2018 Bryan Cave LLP $32,662.90 Fees for Legal Services -Dec 2017 2/2/2018 McDermot,Will & Emery LLP $10,000.00 IRC Legislative Advocacy Matters -Dec 1/17/2018 Bryan Cave LLP - $6,358.50 Fees for Legal Services -Nov 2017 12/19/2017 McDermot,Will & Emery LLP $10,089.56 IRC Legislative Advocacy Matters-Oct/Nov 12/19/2017 McDermot,Will & Emery LLP $10,000.00 IRC Legislative Advocacy Matters -Sept Subtotal Expenses FY 17/18 $634,725.58 9/30/2017 McDermot,Will & Emery LLP $10,033.78 Fees for Legal Services -Aug & Sept 9/30/2017 McDermot,Will & Emery LLP $10,000.00 IRC Legislative Advocacy Matters 9/30/2017 Bryan Cave LLP $2,995.50 Fees for Legal Services -Sept 2017 9/30/2017 Bryan Cave LLP - $1,119.00 Fees for Legal Services -Aug 2017 9/27/2017 Bryan Cave LLP $13,195.60 Fees for Legal Services -July 2017 8/15/2017 Bryan Cave LLP $5,893.00 Fees for Legal Services- lune 2017 7/17/2017 Bryan Cave LLP $20,729.17 Fees for Legal Services -May 2017 private activity bonds 7/17/2017 Bryan Cave LLP $1,551.00 Fees for Legal Services- May 2017 6/13/2017 Bryan Cave LLP $823.50 Fees for Legal Services -April 2017 1 5/12/2017 Bryan Cave LLP $2,608.50 Fees for Legal Services -March 2017 5/12/2017 Bryan Cave LLP $77.02 Fees for Legal Service -March 2017 private activity bonds 4/10/2017 Bryan Cave LLP $3,385.90 Fees for Legal Services -Feb 2017 4/10/2017 Bryan Cave LLP $375.00 Fees for Legal Services -Feb 2017 private activity bonds 3/8/2017 Bryan Cave LLP $11,097.20 Fees for Legal Services- Jan 2017 3/8/2017 Bryan Cave LLP $14,886.78 Fees for Legal Services -Jan 2017 private activity bonds 2/20/2017 Bryan Cave LLP $342.50 Fees for Legal Services- Dec 2016 2/20/2017Bryan Cave LLP $53,720.93 Fees for Legal Services -Dec 2016 private activity bonds 1/24/2017 Shubin & Bass PAS $4,795.00 Fees for Legal Services -Nov 2016 74 Services ance 75 1/17/2017 Bryan Cave LLP $534.50 Fees for Legal Services-Nov 2016 12/1/2016 Bryan Cave LLP $1,722.50 Fees for Legal Services-Oct 2016 12/1/2016 Shubin & Bass PAS $9,387.20 Fees for Legal Services-Oct 2016 9/30/2016 Bryan Cave LLP $5,060.15 Fees for Legal Services-Sept 2016 9/30/2016 Bryan Cave LLP $20,358.95 Fees for Legal Services-Aug 2016 9/30/2016 Shubin & Bass PAS $28,277.00 Fees for Legal Services-Sept 2016 9/28/2016 Shubin&Bass PAS $15,581.00 Fees for Legal Services-July 2016 9/14/2016 Bryan Cave LLP $3,457.13 Fees for Legal Services-July 2016- private activity bonds 8/16/2016 Bryan Cave LLP $1,754.00 Fees for Legal Services-June 2016 7/19/2016 Bryan Cave LLP $3,561.50 Fees for Legal Services -May 2016 6/21/2016 Shubin & Bass PAS $11,591.49 Fees for Legal Services -May 2016 6/14/2016 Bryan Cave LLP $386.10 Fees for Legal Services-April 2016-private activity bonds 5/3/2016 Shubin & Bass PAS $21,968.25 Fees for Legal Services-March 2016 4/19/2016 Bryan Cave LLP $128,696.58 Fees for Legal Services-March 2016-private activity bonds 4/6/2016 Nabors & Glblin $150.00 Fees for Legal Services-August 2015 3/16/2016 Bryan Cave LLP $31,795.61 Fees for Legal Service-Jan 2016-private activity bonds 2/9/2016 Bryan Cave LLP $16,410.09 Fees for Legal Service -Dec 2015 private activity bonds 1/20/2016 Bryan Cave LLP $50,663.10 Fees for Legal Service-Nov 2015 private activity bonds 12/8/2015 Bryan Cave LLP $27,303.95 Fees for Legal Services Oct 2015 Subtotal Expenses FY 15/16 $807,167.15 9/30/2015 Bryan Cave LLP $7,113.36 Fees for Legal Services-Sept 2015 private activity bonds 9/30/2015 Bryan Cave LLP $55,354.02 Fees for Legal Services-Aug 2015 private activity bonds 8/28/2015 Bryan Cave LLP $6,307.05 Fees for Legal Services-July 2015 8/12/2015 Bryan Cave LLP $37,687.25 Fees for Legal Services -lune 2015 7/1/2015 Bryan Cave LLP $37,048.25 Fees for Legal Services -May 2015 7/1/2015 Bryan Cave LLP $28,871.78 Fees for Legal Services-April 2015 private activity bonds 5/20/2015 Nabors Giblin & Nickerson PA $500.00 Fees for Legal Services 05/12/15 Bryan Cave LLP $145,105.00 Fees for Legal Services 3/24/15 Nabors Giblin & Nickerson PA* $617.49 IRC 1/3 Portion of Legal Fees 12/22/14 Bryan Cave LLP $33,252.60 Fees for Legal Services Subtotal Expenses FY 14/15 $1,064,319.15 9/30/14 Bryan Cave LLP $638.70 Fees for Legal Services Subtotal Expenses FY 13/14 $28,551.80 Services ance 75 Acct#00110111-034020-15023 All Travel Travel Date 7/10/2018 Florida Dept of Transportation $82.84 Public Records Request 4/16/2019 Tim Zorc-FDFC Meeting -Orlando $97.32 4/28/2017 Martin County 50% reimbursement -$3,380.35 50% reimbursement 3/13/2019 Bob Solari-FDFC Meeting -Orlando $92.32 2/20/2017 Atkins North America,lnc. $1,607.00 Drainage Reports & calculations 12/4/2018 Kate Cotner -US Dist Court Hearing -Washington OC -Hotel $174.90 12/1/2016 VB Court Reporters $300.00 St Johns Admin Hearing Subtotal Expenses FY 18/19 $1,406.74 9/30/2018 Subtotal Expenses FY 16/17 $18,779.15 9/30/2018 Kate Cotner -FL Dev Finance Corp Mtg-Orlando-hotel $113.50 9/30/2016 Triad Railroad Consultants $24,758.59 Review AAF 90% & plans 9/11/2018 Kate Cotner -FL Dev Finance Corp Mtg-Orlandc $111.91 9/30/2016 Federal Express $8.18 9/11/2018 Peter O'Bryan- FL Dev Finance Corp Mtg-Orlandc - $91.52 7/12/2016 Dylan Reingold-travel to Wash DC $928.37 AAF Hearing 9/4/2018 Jason E. Brown -FL Dev Finance Corp Mtg- Orlando $91.52 5/23/2016 FederalExpress $6.10 Shipping 5/8/2018 Kate P. Cotner -Capital Hill All Aboard FL Mtg $271.64 4/19/16 GK Environmental $1,875.00 Prelim wetland determination 5/1/2018 American Airlines -Kate Cotner $167.20 1/25/2016 VB Court Reporting $417.50 IRC vs Rogoff 5/1/2018 The Liason Capitol Hill Hotel -Dylan Reingold - $548.74 9/30/2015 Dylan Reingold $412.00 Reimburse for case filing 9/30/2017 Delta Air $191.80 8/25/2015 Railroad Consultant Group $36,053.97 Rail Safety Study 9/30/2017 Jet Blue $168.20 7/14/2015 Federal Express $6.31 Shipping 9/30/2017 Bob Solari -travel to Washington DC $869.98 with OMB,Senator & Congressman & FOOT 6/16/2015 Federal Express $7.84 Shipping 9/30/2017 Kate Cotner -travel to Washington DC $768.02 5/12/2015 Treasury of the United States $570.00 Public Records 6/28/2017 Kate Cotner -Tag Meeting $60.07 mileage to Cocoa Acct#00110111-034020-15023 All Travel Travel Date 4/24/2019 Dylan Reingold-FDFC Meeting on Brightline $400.39 4/16/2019 Tim Zorc-FDFC Meeting -Orlando $97.32 3/13/2019 Peter O'Bryan-FDFC Meeting -Orlando $111.32 3/13/2019 Bob Solari-FDFC Meeting -Orlando $92.32 12/12/2018 Kate Cotner -US Dist Court Hearing -Washington DC -expense $156.89 12/4/2018 Kate Cotner -US Dist Court Hearing -Washington OC -Hotel $174.90 12/4/2018 Kate Cotner -US Dist Court Hearing -Washington DC -Flight $373.60 Subtotal Expenses FY 18/19 $1,406.74 9/30/2018 Dylan Reingold-FL Dev Finance Corp Mtg-Orlando-hotel $113.50 9/30/2018 Kate Cotner -FL Dev Finance Corp Mtg-Orlando-hotel $113.50 9/30/2018 Tim Zorc- FL Dev Finance Corp Mtg-Orlando-hotel $113.50 9/11/2018 Kate Cotner -FL Dev Finance Corp Mtg-Orlandc $111.91 9/11/2018 Dylan Reingold-FL Dev Finance Corp Mtg-Orlando $122.06 9/11/2018 Peter O'Bryan- FL Dev Finance Corp Mtg-Orlandc - $91.52 9/4/2018 Tim Zorc- FL Dev Finance Corp Mtg-Orlando $110.45 9/4/2018 Jason E. Brown -FL Dev Finance Corp Mtg- Orlando $91.52 5/8/2018 Dylan Reingold-Capital Hill All Aboard FL Mtg $161.89 5/8/2018 Kate P. Cotner -Capital Hill All Aboard FL Mtg $271.64 5/1/2018 The Liaison Capital Hill Hotel -Kate Cotner $274.37 5/1/2018 American Airlines -Kate Cotner $167.20 5/1/2018 let Blue -Dylan Reingold $128.20 5/1/2018 The Liason Capitol Hill Hotel -Dylan Reingold - $548.74 Subtotal Expenses FY 17/18 $2,420.00 9/30/2017 Delta Air $191.80 9/30/2017 American Airlines $193.20 9/30/2017 Jet Blue $168.20 9/30/2017 Jet Blue $25.00 9/30/2017 Bob Solari -travel to Washington DC $869.98 with OMB,Senator & Congressman & FOOT Acct#00110214-034020-15023 All Travel 9/30/2017 Kate Cotner -travel to Washington DC $768.02 9/30/2017 Dylan Reingold-travel to Washington DC $753.49 6/28/2017 Kate Cotner -Tag Meeting $60.07 mileage to Cocoa Subtotal Expenses FY 16/17 $3,029.76 4/20/2016 Dylan Reingold $106.26 Hearing 4/6/2016 Aloft Hotel $109.00 MHG Tallahassee AL P -Dylan Reingold 12/16/2015 Kimberly Graham $901.76 Fed Railway Assoc. Mtg-Washington DC 12/2/2015 Kate Cotner -FAC Legislative Conference $19.44 Subtotal Expenses FY 15/16 $1,136.46 9/8/2015 Doubletree Orlando $271.36 Orlando -Travel -FI. Dev. Finance Corp 8/26/2015 Dylan Reingold $75.26 76 8/26/2015 Kate Cotner -$5.36 Orlando -Travel -FL Dev. Finance Corp Acct#11124319-033190 Other Professional Services Date Vendor Amount Notes 7/02/15 CDM Smith Inc - $23,454.00 Work Order 10 EIS 1/02/15 CDM Smith Inc $6,973.40 Work Order 13 Noise Monitoring 1/02/15 CDM Smith Inc $2,122.50 Work Order 10 EIS 11/26/14 CDM Smith Inc $5,605.00 Work Order 10 EIS 11/21/14 CDM Smith Inc $6,585.80 Work Order 13 Noise Monitoring Subtotal Expenses FY 14/1s $44,740.70 9/30/14 CDM Smith Inc $1,937.00 Work Order 13 Noise Monitoring 9/30/14 - CDM Smith Inc $8,077.00 Work Order 10 EIS 8/29/14 CDM Smith Inc $4,135.00 Work Order 10 EIS 8/08/14 CDM Smith Inc $3,125.00 Work Order 10 EIS Subtotal Expenses FY 13/14 $17,274.00 Total Expenses 19/20 $17,337.00 Total Expenses 18/19 $550,267.12 Total Expenses 17/18 $637,344.22 Total Expenses 16/17 $223,471.97 Total Expenses 15/16 $870,867.50 Total Expenses 14/15 $1,154,211.26 Total Expenses 13/14 $45,825.80 Total expenses processed as of 11/25/2019 $3,499,324.87 Total Board authorized budget for FY 19/20 $497,432.88 Total Board authorized budget for FY 18/19 $550,267.12 Total Board authorized budget for FY 17/18 $637,344.22 Total Board authorized budget for FY 16/17 $223,471.97 Total Board authorized budget for FY 15/16 $870,867.50 Total Board authorized budget for FY 14/15 $1,154,211.26 Total Board authorized budget for FY 13/14 $45,825.80 Total budgeted 13/14-19/20 $3,979,420.75 Remaining Balance $480,095.88 77 G� A ORI'D Indian River County Venue Event Calendar Review For more information go to www.ircgov.com - Event Calendar Indian River Youth Livestock -Swine Weigh Dec 6-8 @ IRC Fairgrounds: • Friday - Sunday - Youth livestock / swine weigh. Vero Beach Gun Show Dec_ 7-8 @ IRC Fairgrounds: • Saturday 9am-5pm Sunday 9am-4pm. 30th Annual Indian River County Senior Championship 7.B www.patribtshows.com Dec 7-8 @ Sandridge Golf Club: • Sat & Sun: Sam - $125.00 per player includes golf, prizes and lunch on Sunday. 32nd Annual Treasure Coast Amateur Championship Dec 7-8 @ Sandridge Golf Club: • Sat & Sun Sam: Amateur male/female competitors of any age welcome - $125 each. Friends of the Library Fashion Show Dec 9 @ IRC Main Library: • IIam- Tickets can be purchased for $5 donation = proceeds go to the Library. FREE Open House - iG Gymnastics Coming January 2020 Dec 10 & Dec 12 @ iG Center: • 1pm: Preschool Session 2pm: Mommy & Me Session Santa's Calling! - FREE Phone Call From Santa Himself! Dec 12 @ IRC Recreation Dept. (iG Center): • 5-8pm- Register from Nov 11 -Dec 11 for a FREE phone call from Santa! SUPERSIZED FREE Family Movie Night - featuring "The Santa Clause" Dec 14 @ Gifford Aquatic Center: Brought to you by the IRC Recreation Dept. • 5pm: Fun activities. 6pm: FREE Movie. Sponsored By Proctor Construction Co. Community Office Hours Event Dec 19 @ North IRC Library: • l Dam- One on one with Commissioner Susan Adams. Escape Room: Ringing in the New Year Dec 31 @ Brackett Library: • 1pm- Can you escape the room? Grab your friends and register in advance$ Citrus Classic by Maximum Velocity Gymnastics Jan 4 @ iG Center: • 8am-8pm: Gymnastics tournament. South County Community Meeting Jan 6 @ iG Center: • 5:30-7pm: Local topics with Commissioner Peter O'Bryan. Preschool Gymnastics Program Begins Jan 7 @ iG Center: • 1pm: Preschool Session 2pm: Mommy & Me Session Dog Man Party Jan 11 @ IRC Main Library: • 10:30am- Enjoy games and crafts about our favorite part dog, part human hero! Vero Beach Winter Arts and Crafts Expo www.patriotshows.com Jan 11-12 @ IRC Fairgrounds: • Sat: loam-5pm & Sun: loam-4pm. Event by Patriot Productions. Community Office Hours Event Jan 16 @ North IRC Library: • I Oam- One on one with Commissioner Susan Adams. 2nd Annual Youth Sports Summit Jan 18 @ iG Center: • l Dam-2pm: One stop visit for. all your Local Youth Sports information for 2020. Daddy Daughter Dance REGISTRATION BEGINS Jan 20 @ iG Center: • 9am-8pm: Registration is $42.80 per couple. Dance is Feb 22, 2020. Youth Baseball - Spring REGISTRATION BEGINS Jan 25 @ iG Center: • 9am-4pm: Registration is $45 per child. Season begins early April 2020. Spring Break Camp REGISTRATION BEGINS Jan 27 @ iG Center: • 9am-8pm: Registration is $75 per child. Spring Break is March 23-27. 79 7 C r December 3, 2019 Informational Item INDIAN RIVER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS INTER -OFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: Members of the Board of County Commissioners DATE: November 22, 2019 SUBJECT: 2019-2020 City of Vero Beach Appointments FROM: Tina Cournoyer Executive Assistant to County Administrator Please find the City of Vero Beach liaison assignments to the County and Regional Boards for 2019- 2020. Back-up included. CITY OF VERO BEACH COMMITTEE APPOINTMENTS 2019-2020 1. TREASURE COAST COUNCIL OF LOCAL GOVERNMENTS This Board meets the first Wednesday of every month at 10:00 a.m. The meetings are held in conference room #3 in the Roger Poitras Annex Building (off of Virginia Avenue). Councilmember Rey Neville 2. TREASURE COAST REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL This Board meets the third Friday of each month at 9:30 a.m. The meetings are held in Stuart, Florida. Vice Mayor Laura Moss 3. COUNTY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL (EDC) This Committee meets the third Tuesday each month at 3:30 p.m.. The meetings are held in the first floor conference room at the County Administration Building. Councilmember Robbie Brackett 4. TOURIST DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL This Committee meets on an as needed basis. The meetings are held at the County Administration Building. Vice Mayor Laura Moss 5. METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION (MPO) This Board meets the second Wednesday of each month at 10:00 a.m. The meetings are held in the first floor conference room at the County Administration Building. The City has two full members and one alternate member serving on this Board. Vice Mayor Laura Moss, Councilmember Joe Graves, Councilmember Rey Neville 6. TREASURE COAST. LEAGUE OF CITIES M-4 This Board meets the third Wednesday of every other. month at 10:30 a.m. at different locations on the Treasure Coast. Mayor Tony Young 7. BEACH AND SHORE PRESERVATION ADVISORY COMMITTEE This Committee meets the third Monday of each month at 3:00 p.m. in the first floor conference room located in the County Administration Building. Councilmember Robbie Brackett 8. ELECTED OFFICIALS OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE This Committee meets once a year on the second Friday in April at 9:00 a.m. at the County Administration Building. Councilmember Joe Graves 9. COUNTY AFFORDABLE HOUSING COMMITTEE Vice Mayor Laura Moss 10. INDIAN RIVER COUNTY 2020 COMMUNITY ACTION COMMITTEE Vice Mayor Laura Moss 82 December 3, 2019 Informational Item INDIAN RIVER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS INTER -OFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: Members of the Board of County Commissioners DATE: November 22, 2019 SUBJECT: 2019-2020 City of Fellsmere Appointments FROM: Tina Cournoyer Executive Assistant to County Administrator Please find the City of Fellsmere liaison assignments to the County and Regional Boards for 2019-2020. Back-up included. 83 2019-2020 CITY OF FELLSMERE REPRESENTATION INDIAN RIVER COUNTY- COMMITTEES & ADVISORY BOARDS Must be Elected Officials 1. TREASURE COAST COUNCIL OF LOCAL GOVERNMENTS Joel Tyson, Mayor — Member Gerald "Jerry" Renick, Council Member - Alternate Member Meets Monthly 1st Wednesday @ 10:00 a.m., Ft. Pierce 2. TREASURE COAST REGIONAL LEAGUE OF CITIES Joel Tyson, Mayor — Member Gerald "Jerry" Renick, Council Member - Alternate Member 3. BEACH & SHORE PRESERVATION Inocensia "Ino" Hernandez, Council Member — Member Jessica Salgado, Mayor Pro -Tem — Alternate Member 4. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL Jessica Salgado, Mayor Pro -Tem Inocensia Hernandez — Council Member -Alternate Member 5, ELECTED OFFICIALS OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE Jessica Salgado, Mayor Pro - Tem — Member Inocensia Hernandez, Council Member—Alternate Member 6. METROPOLT/AN PLANN/NG ORGANIZAT/ON Gerald "Jerry" Renick, Council Member — Member Jessica Salgado, Mayor Pro -Tem - Alternate Member Meets bi-monthly 3rd Wed. @ 10:00 am Various locations Meets Monthly 3rd Monday at 3:00 pm IRC Admin Bldg B Meets Monthly 3`d Tuesday @ 3:30 pm IRC Admin Bldg B Meets once per year Meets Monthly 2nd Wednesday @ 10 am IRC Admin Bldg B 7. SCHOOL CONCURRENCY WORKING GROUP COMMITTEE Jessica Salgado, Mayor Pro - Tem— Mark D. Mathes, City Manager Meets twice per year: 15tweek of February, 3rd week of March, & Warren W. Dill, City Attorney IRC Admin Bldg A TREASURE COAST REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL Gerald "Jerry" Renick, Council Member BOCC Census Committee Nicholas Rojas, Planner I Staff Appointments MPO BICYCLE ADVISORY COMMITTEE Chief Keith Touchberry MPO TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE Mark D. Mathes, City Manager Nicholas Rojas, City Planner I, Alternate AFFORDABLE HOUSING ADVISORY COMMITTEE Mark D. Mathes, Member Nicholas Rojas, City Planner I, Alternate FACT Jessica Salgado, Mayor Pro - Tem Citizen Appointments MPO CITIZENS ADVISORY COMMITTEE Clarence Korker Meets Monthly 31d Friday at 9:30 a.m./Stuart Meets 411' Thursday Monthly @ 2 p.m., IRC Admin Bldg. B Meets 4d' Friday Monthly @ 10 a.m., IRC Admin Bldg B As Needed Meets 1st Tuesday Monthly @ 2 p.m., IRC Admin Bldg B SCHOOL PLANNING CITIZEN OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE Meets once per year— April @ 3 p.m., IRC Admin Bldg B Yolanda Gamez IRCCOM LIST_19-zo FI NAL(3).DOC INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA MEMORANDUM TO: Jason E. Brown, County Administrator THROUGH: Richard B. Szpyrka, P.E., Public Works Director FROM: Monique Filipiak, Land Acquisition Specialist SUBJECT: 26th Street—Advance Acquisition of Right -of -Way 260151st Avenue, Vero Beach, FL 32966 Owner: Theodore Bartosiewicz DATE: November 13, 2019 DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS Theodore Bartosiewicz owns a 0.27 acre parcel of property located at 260151St Avenue, Vero Beach, FL 32966. Staff was recently approached by Mr. Bartosiewicz who wants to sell the property. The subject property was built in 1954 and is zoned RS -6 Single -Family Residential District, up to six units/acres. As part of the Indian River County Comprehensive Plan's five-year Capital Improvement Element, the widening of 26th Street to four lanes between 43`d and 58th Avenues, is included and allocates funds for the purchase of right-of-way. This parcel is located on the northwest corner of 5111 Avenue and 26th Street and due to right of way needs for the project, acquisition of 0.27 acres of the parcel is warranted. The County obtained an appraisal of the property indicating a value of $100,000.00. The County offered the appraised value to Mr. Bartosiewicz and he accepted the offer. Once the necessary right-of-way has been taken from the parcel, the remaining parcel and associated structure can be sold. FUNDING Funding for this expenditure in the amount of $100,000.00 is available from Acct #10215241-066120- 06011, Traffic Impact Fees/District II/ROW/26th Street/43rd Ave to 58th Ave. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends the Board approve $100,000.00 forthe purchase of 0.27 acres of property located at 260151St Avenue, Vero Beach, FL 32966 and authorize the Chairman to execute the purchase agreement on behalf of the Board. Staff also recommends the Board authorize the Purchasing Division to advertise the unneeded portion of the parcel for sale. ATTACHMENTS Purchase Agreement Boundary Survey APPROVED AGENDA ITEM FOR: December 3, 2019 85 we "i AGREEMENT TO PURCHASE, SELL, AND LEASE REAL ESTATE BETWEEN INDIAN RIVER COUNTY AND THEODORE BARTOSIEWICZ THIS AGREEMENT TO PURCHASE AND SELL REAL ESTATE ("Agreement') is made and entered into as of the day of , 201.9, by and between Indian River County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida ("the County"), and Theodore Bartosiewicz., ("the Seller) who agree as follows: WHEREAS, Seller owns property located at 260151 st Avenue, Vero Beach, Florida 32966. A legal description of the property is attached to this agreement as Exhibit"A" and incorporated by reference herein; and WHEREAS, the County is purchasing right-of-way for the future expansion of 26th Street; and WHEREAS, in order to proceed with road expansion plans, the County needs to purchase property to be used as right-of-way from landowners adjacent to 26th Street; and WHEREAS, the County was contacted by the Seller to purchase the parcel of approximately 0.27 acres of property as depicted on Exhibit "B", and WHEREAS, the County is currently purchasing property/right-of-way from willing sellers; and NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual terms, conditions, promises, covenants and premises hereinafter, the COUNTY and SELLER agree as follows: 1. Recitals,, The above recitals are affirmed as being true and correct and are incorporated herein. 2. Agr_eement_to Purchase and Sell.. The Seller hereby agrees to sell to the County, and the County hereby agrees to purchase from Seller, upon the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement that certain parcel of real property located at 2601 51st Avenue, Vero Beach, Florida and more specifically described in the legal description attached as Exhibit "A", fee simple, containing approximately 0.27 acres,.all improvements thereon, together with all easements, rights and uses now or hereafter belonging thereto (collectively, the "Property"). 2.1 Rurchase-Price, Effective Date. The purchase price . ("Purchase Price") for the Property shall be $100,000.00 (One Hundred Thousand and 00/100 Dollars). The Purchase Price shall be paid on the Closing Date. The Effective Date of this Agreement shall be the date upon which the County shall have approved the execution of this Agreement, either by approval by the Indian River County Board of County Commissioners at a formal meeting of such Board or by the County Administrator pursuant to his delegated authority. 86 3. Title. Seller shall convey marketable title to the Property by warranty deed free of claims, liens, easements and encumbrances of record or known to Seller; but subject to property taxes for the year of Closing and covenants, restrictions and public utility easements of record provided (a) there exists at Closing no violation of any of the foregoing; and (b) none of the foregoing prevents County's intended use and development of the Property ("Permitted Exceptions"). 3.1 County may order an Ownership and Encumbrance Report or Title Insurance Commitment with respect to the Property. County shall within fifteen (15) days following the Effective Date of this Agreement deliver written notice to Seller of title defects. Title shall be deemed acceptable to County if (a) County fails to deliver notice of defects within the time specified, or (b) County delivers notice and Seller cures the defects within thirty (30) days from receipt of notice from County of title defects ("Curative Period"). Seller shall use best efforts to cure the defects within the Curative Period and if the title defects are not cured within the Curative Period, County shall have thirty (30) days from the end of the Curative Period to elect, by written notice to Seller, to: (i) to terminate this Agreement, whereupon shall be of no further force and effect, or (ii) extend the Curative Period for up to an additional 90 days; or (iii) accept title subject to existing defects and proceed to closing. 4. Representations of the Seller. 4.1 Seller is indefeasibly seized of marketable, fee simple title to the Property, and is the sole owner of and has good right, title, and authority to convey and transfer the Property which is the subject matter of this Agreement, free and clear of all liens and encumbrances. 4.2 From and after the Effective Date of this Agreement, Seller shall take no action which would impair or otherwise affect title to any portion of the Property, and shall record no documents in the Public Records which would affect title to the Property, without the prior written consent of the County. 4.3.1 There are no existing or pending special assessments affecting the Property, which are or may be assessed by any governmental authority, water or sewer authority, school district, drainage district or any other special taxing district. 5. Default. 5.1 In the event the County shall fail to perform any of its obligations hereunder, the Seller shall, at its sole option, be entitled to: (i) terminate this Agreement by written notice delivered to the County at or prior to the Closing Date and thereupon neither the Seller nor any other person or party shall have any claim for specific performance, damages, or otherwise against the County; or (ii) waive the County's default and proceed to Closing. 5.2 In the event the Seller shall fail to perform any of its obligations hereunder, the County shall, at its sole option, be entitled to: (i) terminate this Agreement by written notice delivered to the Seller at or prior to the Closing Date and thereupon neither the County nor 87 any other person or party shall have any claim' for specific performance, damages or otherwise against the Seller; or (ii) obtain specific performance of the terms and conditions hereof; or (iii) waive the Seller's default and proceed to Closing: 6. Closing 6.1 The closing of the transaction contemplated herein ("Closing" and "Closing Date") shall take place within 45 days following the execution of the contract by the Chairman of the Board of County Commissioners. The parties agree that the Closing shall be as follows: (a) The Seller shall execute and deliver to the County a warranty deed conveying marketable title to the Property, free and clear of all liens and encumbrances and in the condition .required by paragraph 3. (b) The County will assume the Seller's current lease with Tenants, Nick and Ember Pappas until the expiration date of March 1, 2020. The Seller shall have removed all of their personal property and equipment from the Property and shall deliver possession of the Property to County in the same or better condition that existed at the Effective Date hereof. (c) If Seller is obligated to discharge any encumbrances at or prior to Closing and fails to do so, County may use a portion of Purchase Price funds to satisfy the encumbrances. (d) If the Seller is a non-resident alien or foreign entity, Seller shall deliverto the County an affidavit, in a form acceptable to the County, certifying that the Seller and any interest holders are not subject to tax under the Foreign Investment and Real Property Tax Act of 1980. (e) The Seller and the County shall each deliver to the other such other documents or instruments as may reasonably be required to close this transaction. 6.2 Taxes. All taxes and special assessments which are a lien upon the property on or prior to the Closing Date (except current taxes which are not yet due and payable) shall be paid by the Seller. 7. .Closing Costs; Expenses. County shall be responsible for preparation of all Closing documents'. 7.1 County shall pay the following expenses at Closing: 7.1.1 The cost of recording the warranty deed and any release or satisfaction obtained by Seller pursuant to this Agreement. 7.1.2 Documentary Stamps required to be affixed to the warranty deed. 7.1.3 All costs and premiums for the owner's marketability title insurance commitment and policy, if any. 7.2 Seller shall pay the following expenses at or prior to Closing: 7.2.1 All costs necessary to cure title defect(s) or encumbrances, other than the Permitted Exceptions, and to satisfy or release of record all existing mortgages, liens or encumbrances upon the Property. 8. Miscellaneous._ 8.1 Controlling Law. This Agreement shall be construed and enforced in accordance with the laws of the State of Florida. Venue shall be in Indian River County for all state court matters, and in the Southern District of Florida for all federal court matters. 8.2 ,Condemnation. In the event that all or any part of the Property shall be acquired or condemned for any public or quasi -public use or purpose, or if any acquisition or condemnation proceedings shall be threatened or begun prior to the Closing of this transaction, County shall have the option to either terminate this Agreement, and the obligations of all parties hereunder shall cease, or to proceed, subject to all other terms, covenants, conditions, representations and warranties of this Agreement, to the Closing of the transaction contemplated hereby and.receive title to the Property; receiving, however, any and all damages, awards or other compensation arising from or attributable to such acquisition or condemnation proceedings. County shall have the right to participate in any such proceedings. 8.3 Entire Agreement.. This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement between the parties with respect to this transaction and supersedes all prior agreements, written or oral, between the Seller and the County relating to the subject matter hereof. Any modification or amendment to this Agreement shall be effective only if in writing and executed by each of the parties. 8.4 Assignment and Binding Effect. Neither County nor Seller may assign its rights and obligations under this Agreement without the prior written consent of the other party. The terms hereof shall be binding upon and shall inure to the benefit of the parties hereto and their successors and assigns. 8.5 Notices. Any notice shall be deemed duly served if personally served or if mailed by certified mail, return receipt requested, or if sent via "overnight' courierserviceorfacsimile transmission, as follows: If to Seller: Theodore Bartosiewicz 617 San Carlos Drive Grand Prairie, TX 75051-4104 If to County: Indian River County 1801 27th Street Vero Beach, FL. 32960 Attn: Land Acquisition/Monique Filipiak :' Either party may change the information above by giving written notice of such change as provided in this paragraph. 8.6 .Survival and Benefit. Except as otherwise expressly provided herein, each agreement, representation or warranty made in this Agreement by or on behalf of either party, or in any instruments delivered pursuant hereto or in connection herewith, shall survive the Closing Date and the consummation of the transaction provided for herein. The covenants, agreements and undertakings of each of the parties hereto are made solely for the benefit of, and may be relied on only by the other party hereto, its successors and assigns, and are not made for the benefit of, nor may they be relied upon, by any other person whatsoever. 8.7 Attorney's Fees and Costs. In any claim or controversy Iarising out of or relating to this Agreement, each party shall bear its own attorney's fees, costs, and expenses. 8.8. :Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in two or more counterparts, each one of which shall constitute an original. 8.9. County Approval Required: This Agreement is subject to approval by the Indian River County as set forth in paragraph 2. 8.10 Beneficial Interest Disclosure: In the event Seller is a partnership, limited partnership, corporation, trust, or any form of representative capacity whatsoever for others, Seller shall provide a fully completed, executed, and sworn beneficial interest disclosure statement in the form attached to this Agreement as an exhibit that complies with all of the provisions of Florida Statutes Section 286.23 prior to approval of this Agreement by the County. However, pursuant to Florida Statutes Section 286.23 (3) (a), the beneficial interest in any entity registered with the Federal Securities and Exchange Commission, or registered pursuant to Chapter 517, Florida Statutes, whose interest is for sale to the general public, is exempt from disclosure; and where the Seller is a non-public entity, that Seller is not required to disclose persons or entities holding less than five (5%) percent of the beneficial interest in Seller. 90 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed this Agreement asof the date first set forth above. INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Approved by BCC U Theodore Bartosiewicz Date ATTEST. Jeffrey R. Smith, Clerk of Court and Comptroller By: Deputy Clerk Approved: Jason E. Brown, County Administrator Approved as to Form and Legal Sufficiency: County Attorney 91 EXHIBIT "A" South 85 feet of Lot 21, HAMPSHIRE SUBDIVISION, according to the plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book 2,. Page 99, of the Public Records of Indian River County, Florida. Commonly known as: 2601.51 st Avenue, Vero Beach, FL 32966 Parcel ID Number: 32-39-33-00004-0000-00021.1 92 Page 1 of 1 EXHIBIT "B" Indian River County, Florida Property Appraiser ParcelID OwnerName PropertyAddress 32393300004000000021.1 BARTOSIEWICZ THEODORE 2601 51ST AV VERO BEACH, FL 32966 Notes 93 http://wwtiv.ircpa.org/PrintMap.aspx 11/8/2019 I 5 � ti cq s lit I CF t g y RS %4 i fit Si BF 9 B It y p�'b �R>? cIx C N dii a 8 E$ } ¢ B ;E n E •, „ o c d 0 O 7 M O M Qt U < N m Fiempehlre Su�dh4slon o E �..� F I fix I I I U O 8j n Stet Avenue Ai U ,:T.:'l,�Ij.•-- --.jw ..— --._T..-- k$ Y1 y z ,.�.a ; - k y" l" J=, L C y!' `$a 9 6 ed 4 gQ 3 YY O O r �2g9ax +d3 5 x $ M v o N l N a — Y F (tA! YAe tet aRl $" J j els .e Ia.3F�e. 4� w z •C s, mmmt—aue aL---- t L �/)----Y----haalaa-- --- ...._. Q w ` I l P t �------------------- ..... • _ -- t a DRi n Bi l 3 r . cc 0 9dF E g o adi� b� i ui bi U. gg l I > els — Z 1E bi is • T � 01 I � se � 9 y rypryp�� pWb 3 � � Ns < E g • w � 6 �q5 R W� � �E Q1 i � K Lt• 2 3S w .......... R66 p� d_ z b mom. 5 n ce uaaaao r I:= v �r G } li 5 � ti cq s lit I CF t g y RS %4 i fit Si BF 9 B It y p�'b �R>? cIx C N dii a 8 E$ } ¢ B ;E n E •, „ o c d 0 O 7 M O M Qt U < N m Fiempehlre Su�dh4slon o E �..� F I fix I I I U O 8j n Stet Avenue Ai U ,:T.:'l,�Ij.•-- --.jw ..— --._T..-- k$ Y1 y z ,.�.a ; - k y" l" J=, L C y!' `$a 9 6 ed 4 gQ 3 YY O O r �2g9ax +d3 5 x $ M v o N l N a — Y F (tA! YAe tet aRl $" J j els .e Ia.3F�e. 4� w z •C s, mmmt—aue aL---- t L �/)----Y----haalaa-- --- ...._. Q w ` I l P t �------------------- ..... • _ -- t a DRi n Bi l 3 r . cc 0 9dF E g o adi� b� i ui bi U. gg l I > els — Z 1E bi is • T � 01 I � se � 9 y rypryp�� pWb 3 � � Ns < E g • w � 6 �q5 R W� � �E Q1 i � K Lt• 2 3S w .......... R66 p� d_ z b mom. 5 n ce uaaaao r I:= g. INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD MEMORANDUM TO: Jason E. Brown County Administrator THROUGH: Richard B. Szpyrka, P.E. Public Works Director FROM: Kendra Cope, M.S. Natural Resources Manager SUBJECT: Release of Retainage - Work Order No. 12 Morgan & Eklund, Inc. Post Hurricane Dorian Beach Profile Surveys DATE: November 20, 2019 DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS On October 4, 2016, the Board approved a contract with Morgan and Eklund, Inc. (M&E) for Professional Land Surveying and Mapping Services for a two-year term. The Board amended the Contract on October 18, 2016. M&E is the selected County Consultant for professional onshore/offshore hydrographic surveying services. On September 17, 2019, the Board approved Work Order No. 12, in the amount of $57,750:00 for services related to post Hurricane Dorian countywide hydrographic surveying (beach profile) for the Sector 3, Sector 5, Sector 7 Beach and Dune Restoration Project areas and additional surveying needed to finish a post Hurricane countywide (22.4 miles) monitoring effort. All onshore and offshore beach profile surveys are conducted along the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) Range Monuments at approximately 1,000 foot intervals (alongshore) and extend from the vegetated dune seaward to a location approximately 40 feet offshore (cross -shore). Survey data from summer profile surveys are provided to FDEP. To date all work is 100% complete. The total amount of retainage withheld under Work Order No. 12, is $5,775.00. A copy of the invoice is available for review in the Public Works office. FUNDING Local funding of Beach Restoration includes a portion of Local Option Tourist Tax. Funding for the release of retainage in the amount of $5,775.00 is budgeted and available in the Beach Restoration Fund, Hurricane Dorian Account No. 128-206000-19028. Post storm beach profile surveys may be eligible for FEMA reimbursement if funding becomes available. Page 2 95 Post Hurricane Dorian Beach Profile Surveys Retainage Agenda Item for December 3, 2019 RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends the Board approve the release of all withheld retainage under Work Order No.12 in the amount of $5,775.00. APPROVED AGENDA ITEM FOR: DECEMBER 3, 2019 96 B,C- Consent Item Indian River County, Florida Department of Utility Services Board Memorandum Date: November 18, 2019 To: Jason E. Brown, County Administrator From: Vincent Burke, PE, Director of Utility Services Prepared By: Arjuna Weragoda, PE, Capital Projects Manager Subject: Request to Waive the Bid Process for the Replacement of Blowers for the Sludge Holding Tank at West Regional Wastewater Treatment Facility Descriptions and Conditions: On May 15, 2018, the Indian River County Board of County Commissioners (BCC) approved Work Order No. 1 to Schulke, Bittle and Stoddard, LLC, (SBS) to provide professional engineering services for design, bidding assistance and construction management services for the failing blowers and the blower building at the West Regional Wastewater Treatment Facility (WRWWTF). On August 13, 2019, BCC authorized the Purchasing Manager to issue a purchase orderto Excelsior Blower Systems, Inc., to direct purchase two blower assemblies. As part of the direct purchase, Excelsior has now provided shop drawings, and the shop drawings have been reviewed and approved by SBS and Indian River County Department of Utility Services (IRCDUS) staff. Analysis: In the meantime, SBS prepared plans and specifications and solicited price proposals for the installation of the new blower assemblies and demolition of the existing building, including electrical work, from five contractors. The five contractors are as follows: • Paragon Electric • Moss Kelley • Contract Service Electric • Manning Electric • Larry Schlitt Construction, Inc. Although, all five contractors showed interest, only two submitted price proposals. The other three declined submitting proposals verbally to our consultant. The two contractors who submitted price proposals are Paragon and Larry Schlitt. Contractor Proposal Amount Larry Schlitt Construction, Inc $ 38,100.00 Paragon Electric of Vero, Inc $ 81,306.00 F:\Utilities\UTILITY - Engineering\WWTF - West Regional\Blower Building Rehab 2018\BCC Items\Agenda - Waive Bid Process - 9., Construction.docx Funding: Funds for this project are derived from the capital budget in the Utilities operating fund. Utilities operating funds are generated from water and sewer revenues. Description Account Number Amount WRWWTF Blower Room Replacement 471-169000-18521 $38,100.00 Recommendation: Staff recommends the Board of County Commissioners waive the bid process and, pending receipt and approval of the required insurance by the Risk Manager, authorize the Purchasing Division to issue a purchase order to Larry Schlitt Construction, Inc., in the amount of $38,100.00 for the installation of the new blower assemblies and demolition of the existing building including electrical work at the West Regional Wastewater Treatment Facility. Attachment(s): 1. Larry Schlitt Construction, Inc. Proposal 98 LARRY SCHLITT CONSTRUCTION, INC. 1000 291h Avenue Vero Beach, FL 32960 License #CBC059392 Cell (772)473-2088;0 Office (772)473-2066 Email: Ischlittconst@belIsouth.net PROPOSAL Date Job 11/12/2019 west Regional 8405 8th Street Wastewater Treatment Vero Beach, FL 32968 Facility To: Job Location: Indian River County Dept. of Utilities West Regional Wastewater Treatment Facility 180127th Street 8405 8th Street Vero Beach, FL 32960 Vero Beach, FL 32968 Description Estimate for work at the West Regional Wastewater Treatment Facility in IRC, 8405 8th Street, which includes: • Remove existing metal structure • Remove two (2) blowers • Keep one (1) blower operational during demo • Pour new pad for the new blower • Set new rack and install new control panels • Set one (1) new blower and hookup • Remove last blower and pour new pad • Install 2nd new blower and hook up • Install one (1) new pole light • Install step down transformer and new 120/240 volt panel • Reconnect 120 volt circuits • Step down transformer and outdoor panel Subtotal: $35,100.00 Contractor's Fee: $3,000.00 Total Cost: 38 100.00 All material is guaranteed to be as specified, and the above work to be performed in accordance with he drawings .and specifications submitted for above work and completed in a substantial workmanlike manner for the sum of $38,100.00 (Thirty -Eight Thousand One Hundred Dollars and no cents) With payments to be made as follows: Draw Schedule to be determined 99 Any alteration or deviation from above specifications involving extra costs will be executed only upon written order, and will become an extra charge over and above the estimate. All agreements contingent upon strikes, accidents, or delays beyond our control. Owner Supplied Items: All materials supplied by the Owner or Others are to be on site at the start.of the project. It is the responsibility of the Owner to ensure the owner -supplied items are in sufficient condition to be installed and that all necessary parts to install such items are present. The Owner bears all responsibilities pertaining to the condition, performance, and warranties of owner -supplied items. Larry Schlitt Construction, Inc. shall install owner -supplied items "as -is" and shall bear no responsibility, either explicit or implied, for the item or for its condition, performance, or warranty. Respectfully Submitted: By: Lawrence Schlitt, President for Larry Schlitt Construction, Inc. Note: This proposal may be withdrawn if not accepted within 15 days. Acceptance of Proposal: The above prices, specifications, and conditions are satisfactory and are hereby accepted. You are authorized to do the work as specified. Payment will be made as outlined above. Accepted By: Owner Date 100 CONSENT AGENDA Indian River County, Florida Department of Utility Services Board Memorandum Date: November4, 2019 To: Jason E. Brown, County Administrator From: Vincent Burke, PE, Director of Utility Services Prepared By: Arjuna Weragoda, PE, Capital Projects Manager Subject: Groundwater Modeling and Impact Evaluations with CDM Smith Descriptions and Conditions: Indian River County Department of Utility Services (IRCDUS) owns and operates two (2) regional potable watertreatment plants (WTP). The South County WTP withdraws groundwaterfrom seven existing Upper Floridan Aquifer (UFA) production wells, while the North County WTP relies on groundwater from nine existing UFA production wells. The St. Johns River Water Management District (SJRWMD) requires that proposed groundwater withdrawals be evaluated against the following water resources evaluation criteria: • No interference with other existing legal users; • Cannot induce saline water intrusion; • Cannot cause or contribute to pollution of the water resources; • Cannot adversely affect existing offsite land uses by more than 10 percent (measured in both quantity and quality of water degradation); • Cannot produce environmental impacts (e.g., harm to wetlands); and • No lowering of Minimum Flows and Levels (MFLs) for designated water bodies. Analysis: Staff requested CDM Smith Inc. (CDM) prepare a proposal to update the groundwater modeling. The work order will be provided in accordance with the Agreement for Professional Services Contract No. 2018008 dated April 17, 2018. The scope is more specifically described in the attached Work Order No. 5. The total negotiated cost for the groundwater modeling in Work Order No.5 is a sum amount of $64,800. Funding: Funds for this project are derived from the other professional services account in the Utilities operating fund. Utilities operating funds are generated from water and sewer sales. Description Account Number Amount Other Professional Services 47123536-033190 $64,800 101 F:\Utilities\UTILITY - Engineering\WATER\CUP-10524\Admin\Agenda - Groundwater 11-4-19.docx Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of Work Order No. 5 and requests that the Board of County Commissioners authorize the Chairman to execute the Work Order on their behalf to engage the services of CDM Smith for a sum amount of $64,800.00. Attachment: .Work Order No.5 with CDM. (5 Pages) 102 CCNA2018 WORK ORDER 5 GROUNDWATER MODELING AND IMPACT EVALUATIONS IN SUPPORT OF MODIFICATION OF WATER USE PERMIT NUMBER 10524 This Work Order Number 5 is entered into as of this_ day of , 2019, pursuant to that certain Continuing Consulting Engineering Services Agreement for Professional Services entered into as of this 17th day of April, 2018 (collectively referred to as the "Agreement"), by and between INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Florida ("COUNTY") and CDM Smith ("Consultant"). The COUNTY has selected the Consultant to perform the professional services set forth on Exhibit A (Scope of Work), attached to this Work Order and made part hereof by this reference. The professional services will be performed by the Consultant for the fee schedule set forth in Exhibit B (Fee Schedule), attached to this Work Order and made a part hereof by this reference. The Consultant will perform the professional services within the timeframe more particularly set forth in Exhibit C (Time Schedule), attached to this Work Order and made a part hereof by this reference all in accordance with the terms and provisions set forth in the Agreement. Pursuant to paragraph 1.4 of the Agreement, nothing contained in any Work Order shall conflict with the terms of the Agreement and the terms of the Agreement shall be deemed to be incorporated in each individual Work Order as if fully set forth herein. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Work Order as of the date first written above. CONSULTANT: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY By: Print Name: Title: By: , Chairman BCC Approved Date: Attest: Jeffrey R. Smith, Clerk of Court and Comptroller By: Deputy Clerk Approved: Approved as to form and legal sufficiency: Jason E. Brown, County Administrator Dylan T. Reingold, County Attorney 103 EXHIBIT A CCNA-2018 WO NO. 5 FOR INDIAN RIVER COUNTY UTILITIES GROUNDWATER MODELING AND IMPACT EVALUATIONS IN SUPPORT OF MODIFICATION OF WATER USE PERMIT NUMBER 10524 This Work Order, when executed, shall be incorporated in and become part of the Agreement for Professional Services (Contract #2018008) between Indian River County (OWNER), and CDM Smith Inc. (CONSULTANT), dated April 17, 2018, hereafter referred to as the Agreement. PROJECT BACKGROUND The OWNER owns and operates two Water Treatment Plants [WTPs], the South County WTP and North County WTP. The South County WTP withdraws groundwater from seven existing Upper Floridan Aquifer (UFA) production wells, while the North County WTP relies on groundwater from nine existing UFA production wells. OWNERS's existing Consumptive Use Permit (CUP) (10524) currently allows for a total combined groundwater withdrawal allocation of 12.838 million gallons per day [mgd], with 6.438 mgd from the North County wellfield and 6.40 mgd from the South County wellfield. The current CUP expires on October 11, 2031. OWNER has experienced an increase in demand due to population growth and domestic self -supply users switching over to OWNER's water supply. OWNER began a draft application requesting modification of the existing CUP to the St. Johns River Water Management District (SJRWMD) in 2016. Groundwater modeling was performed to determine if there would be impacts on the water resources, environment, or other permitted users due to the anticipated increases in OWNER withdrawals from the UFA. CONSULTANT used a modified version of the South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD) East Coast Floridan Aquifer Model (ECFM) to perform the impact analysis for the UFA. Since the ECFM did not include the Surficial Aquifer System (SAS), the SJRWMD Coupled Aquifer [COUAQ] model was used to determine the drawdown in the Surficial Aquifer System (SAS) due to increased pumping and groundwater level drawdown in the UFA. The groundwater modeling results and analysis were summarized in a report that along with the model input and output files were submitted to the SJRWMD in support of the draft CUP application. SJRWMD staff previously approved the model as the best tool available for UFA uses in the area and the results of the modeling and impact evaluations. In 2016, the primary obstacle for the OWNER in obtaining their CUP modification was impacts to existing legal users near the north wellfield. OWNER developed a mitigation plan which was accepted and approved by the Board of County Commissioners and SJRWMD. Due to the resurgence of development, the OWNER must now modify the permit to account for the new and future demand projections. Based on actual groundwater withdrawals and an approximate 2 percent increase in demands over time (including an expanded service area), the 2050 demand was calculated to be 23.81 mgd. This is an increase from the existing EOP withdrawal of 12.838 mgd , which was used in the draft 2016 CUP application and the associated groundwater modeling and impact CDM Smith 104 analysis. Additional modeling simulations are therefore necessary to determine whether the new demand of 23.81 mgd will cause any adverse impacts to water resources, environmental resources, and other legal users. This Work Order has been developed to provide the groundwater modeling services with the new projected 2050 demands in support of the CUP modification. , SCOPE OF WORK The following is a description of the work to be provided under this Work Order. TASK 1- GROUNDWATER MODELING AND IMPACT EVALUATIONS The CONSULTANT will perform the required groundwater modeling for inclusion in the initial permit application submittal to SJRWMD. Modeling will be performed using the modified ECFM for the increased UFA allocation and COUAQ model to determine impacts on the SAS consistent with the 2016 modeling and be required by SJRWMD for.the 2020 CUP application. These models were used during previous permit modification attempt in 2016 that were initially accepted by SJRWMD. Up to three (3) groundwater modeling simulations will be performed using the End -of -Permit (EOP) withdrawals for all permitted users, IRCU wells pumping at 0 mgd, and at the requested allocation increase of 23.81 mgd. These three simulations are listed below: 1. Simulation 1 (SIM 1) — IRCU wells and other legal user wells within the model domain pumping at their current EOP withdrawal rate. The CONSULTANT has received a geodatabase from SJRWMD containing EOP withdrawals for all permitted users within the model domain. Simulation 2 (SIM2) — IRCU wells pumping turned off (0 MGD) and other permitted user wells within the model domain pumping at their current EOP withdrawal rate. SJRWMD no longer uses 1995 conditions as baseline conditions and uses "pumps off' (0 mgd) for the applicant's withdrawal for this simulation. 3. Simulation 3 (SIM3) — IRCU wells pumping at their requested withdrawal rate for 2050 (23.81 mgd) and other permitted user wells within the model domain pumping at their current EOP withdrawal rate. These simulations are consistent with the requirements outlined by the SJRWMD in an email dated October 30, 2019. The latest EOP water use withdrawal database will be obtained from the SJRWMD for other permitted users. The wells from this database will be compared to the permitted user wells used during the previous modeling in 2016. Any wells that have been abandoned or capped since 2016, will be removed from the model while any wells that have been permitted since 2016 will be added to the model. The distribution of the 2050 (SIM3) pumping rate between IRCU North and South wellfields will be made after consultation with the OWNER. Model simulations will be used to determine the effects, if any, from the pumpage of the OWNER's wellfield(s) based on the following resources evaluation criteria: CDM Smith 105 • No interference with other existing permitted uses (permitted user experiences 10 percent or greater reduction in withdrawal capability); • Cannot induce saline water intrusion (movement in saline water interface or change in groundwater geochemistry); • Cannot create or contribute to pollution of the water resources; • Cannot adversely affect existing offsite land uses; • Cannot produce impacts to wetlands; and • No lowering minimum flow and levels for designated water bodies. CONSULTANT will produce maps showing the anticipated cone of depression for each wellfield pumping scenario and contours of incremental and cumulative groundwater level drawdown due to pumping. These maps will be used in the evaluation of potential impacts to the resource evaluation criteria above. A modeling report describing the model that was used, a description of the simulations performed, the results of the modeling and impact evaluations including figures and tables will be submitted to the OWNER for review and comment. The CONSULTANT will review and incorporate OWNER comments and finalize the groundwater modeling memorandum. This final report will be used to support the application to renew and modify the OWNER's CUP. The groundwater modeling and impact evaluation Technical Memorandum and model input/output files will be included with the permit application package on the SJRWMD ePermitting portal. TASK 2 - PROJECT AND QUALITY MANAGEMENT Activities performed under this task consist of those general functions required to maintain the project on schedule, within budget, and that the quality of the work products defined within this Work Order is consistent with CONSULTANT's standards and the OWNER's requirements. Specific activities included are identified below: Subtask 2.1- Project Quality Management CONSULTANT maintains a Quality Management System (QMS) on all projects. In accordance with the QMS, a project planning and scope review meeting will be conducted at the start of the project. In addition, the CONSULTANT's Technical Specialists will perform quality reviews of the deliverables identified in Task 1. Subtask 2.2 - Project Status Reports CONSULTANT's project manager will prepare and submit monthly written status reports with each invoice for an anticipated project duration of 4 months. OTHER SERVICES NOT INCLUDED IN THIS WORK ORDER This Work Order does not include the following items: • Development of a water conservation plan • Development of a Reuse Feasibility Study; • Unaccounted for water use survey; Smith 106 Preparation of a Consumptive Use Permit application Permit application fee; or Modeling changes for Requests for Additional Information. OWNER's RESPONSIBILITIES The OWNER will provide all available data requested by the CONSULTANT for the purpose of completing the aforementioned tasks. The data necessary for this project are, but not limited to the following: • Projected water use demands for IRCUD in electronic format. The OWNER will also provide a timely review of all work products. SCHEDULE It is anticipated that the Project will take a total of 3 months to complete, starting within two weeks of receipt of a formal notice to proceed (NTP). The groundwater modeling report with impact evaluations is estimated to be completed within 90 days of Notice -to -Proceed. CONSULTANT will prepare an updated detailed schedule within the first 10 calendar days after Notice to Proceed. COMPENSATION AND PAYMENT Compensation for the work described in this Work Order shall be made on the basis of a lump sum fee. The lump sum fee for. Tasks 1 and 2, inclusive, is $64,800 as shown in Exhibits B-1 and.6-2. CONSULTANT will invoice OWNER on a monthly basis based on percent complete. For invoice purposes only, the value of each task is as shown in the Table 1. Table 1 TASK VALUE FOR INVOICE PURPOSE TASK DESCRIPTION VALUE 1 Groundwater Modeling and Impact Evaluations $57,390 2 Project and Quality Management $7,410 TOTAL WORK ORDER NO. 6 - LUMP SUM $64,800 Smith 107 Consent Item Indian River County, Florida Department of Utility Services Board Memorandum Date: November 21, 2019 To: Jason E. Brown, County Administrator From: Vincent Burke, PE, Director of Utility Services Subject: Fee Agreement with Hopping Green & Sams, P.A. (HGS) Background/Analysis: On July 9, 2018, the County Administrator, pursuant to chapter 105 of the Indian River County Code of Ordinances, signed a not -to -exceed fee agreement with HGS for $50,000. The purpose of the agreement was to utilize the expertise of HGS to assist the County in the preparation of its Consumptive Use Permit (CUP) application package. That work is still on going, and othertasks and data collection assignments are required in order to support a CUP application so that the Indian River County Department of Utility Services (IRCDUS) can apply to increase its water allocation under the permit to meet the needs of its residents and customers over the next 20-30 years. As of November 2019, the fee agreement funds have been exhausted. Staff is requesting a new fee agreement to be approved by the Board of County Commissioners (BCC) that would allow IRCDUS/HGS to continue its discussions with consultants, to develop strategies and approaches to meet the CUP criteria, to meet with Saint Johns River Water Management District (SJRWMD) staff in multiple pre -application meetings to address permitting issues, to prepare and review permit application materials, and to review and edit draft permitting documents. Attachment 1 is the fee agreement. It is anticipated that an additional $45,000 would be required to fulfill the remaining work needed to submit the application. However, this amount does not cover any costs associated with litigating any administrative challenge to the permit by any third party (which is not anticipated to occur, but is possible). Funding: Funds for this project are derived from the other professional services account in the Utilities operating fund. Utilities operating funds are generated from water and sewer sales. Description Account Number Amount Other Professional Services 47123536-033190 $45,000.00 F:\Utilities\UTILITY - Engineering\WATER\CUP-10524\Hopping Green and Sams\Agenda-HGS 11_21_2019.docx Page 1pL2_ Recommendation: Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners approve the fee agreement with Hopping Green & Sams, P.A. for services preparing and reviewing Indian River County Department of Utility Services' Consumptive Use Permit application materials, and authorize the Chairman to execute the agreement on their behalf. Attachments: 1. Fee Agreement F:\Utilities\UTILITY - Engineering\WATER\CUP-10524\Hopping Green And Sams\Agenda-HGS 11_21_2019.Docx 109 FEE AGREEMENT I. PARTIES THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into by and between the following parties: A. Indian River County ("Client") Department of Utility Services c/o Vincent Burke Administration Building A 180127' Street Vero Beach, FL 32960-3388 and B. Hopping Green & Sams, P.A., ("HGS") 119 South Monroe St., Suite 300 (32301) P.O. Box 6526 Tallahassee, FL 32314 II. SCOPE OF SERVICES In consideration of the mutual undertakings and agreements contained herein, the parties agree as follows: A. Client agrees to employ and retain HGS as its attorney and legal representative to assist Client in renewing its consumptive use permit (CUP) and increasing the water allocation under that permit to meet Client's future water needs. This includes working with Client's staff and consultants to develop strategies and approaches to meet the CUP criteria; attending multiple pre -application and other meetings with the St. Johns River Water Management District staff to address permitting issues; preparing and reviewing permit application materials; and reviewing and editing draft permit documents. This representation does not include defending this CUP against an administrative or legal challenge from a third party, which would be covered by a separate agreement should such challenge occur. 110 B. HGS accepts such employment and agrees to serve as attorneys for and provide legal representation to the Client in connection with those matters referenced above. III. CLIENT FILES The files and work product materials ("client file") of the Client generated or received by HGS will be maintained by HGS in its regular offices. At the conclusion of the representation, the client file will be stored by HGS in accordance with HGS' document retention policies but held no longer than 5 years unless specifically directed otherwise by Client, or unless the client file is requested by Client in which event HGS will return the client file to Client assuming all fees and obligations established in this Agreement have been satisfied in accordance with the terms herein. IV. FEES A. The Client agrees to compensate HGS for services rendered in connection with any matters covered by this Agreement according to the agreed upon hourly billing rates for individual HGS lawyers, plus actual expenses incurred by HGS in accordance with the attached standard Expense Reimbursement Policy (Attachment A, incorporated herein by reference). The hourly rates of the attorney(s) who are initially expected to handle the bulk of Client's work are Eric Olsen $405/hour, David Childs $290/hour, Timothy Riley $290/hour, and Erin Tilton $250/hour. To the extent other HGS attorneys or law clerks provide work on this matter, those rates will be provided to Client. Paralegals are billed at $125/hour, legal assistants at $100/hour and the range of hourly rates for HGS attorneys is $245-$550. B. To the extent practicable and consistent with the requirements of sound legal representation, HGS will attempt to reduce Client's bills by assigning each task to the person best able to perform it at the lowest rate so long as he or she has the requisite knowledge and experience. HGS' hourly billing rates are reevaluated annually prior to the beginning of the calendar year and are subject to change each year at that time. Annually revised hourly billing rates will not be put into effect without notice to and consent by Client; however, Client's consent will not be unreasonably withheld for annual adjustments of up to $15/hour. 111 C. In addition to billing for hourly rates, HGS will include costs and expenses (including interest charges on past due statements) on its billing statements for Client reimbursement in accordance with the attached standard Expense Reimbursement Policy (Attachment A). V. FLORIDA EXECUTIVE AND LEGISLATIVE BRANCH LOBBYING LAWS Florida law requires any individual participating in executive or legislative branch lobbying to register as an executive or legislative branch lobbyist and report any fees associated with such representation. To the extent that HGS represents Client on matters before executive branch agencies, or before applicable legislative entities, Client agrees to sign client consent forms required by Florida lobbying law and agrees to registration of HGS attorneys as lobbyists and the reporting of fees associated with such representation. VI. BILLING AND PAYMENT The Client agrees to pay HGS monthly billings for fees and expenses incurred within thirty (30) days following receipt of a statement from HGS. HGS shall not be obligated to perform further legal services under this Fee Agreement if any such billing statement remains unpaid longer than thirty (30) days after submittal to and receipt by Client. Non-payment of fees shall be a basis for HGS to immediately withdraw from the representation without regard to remaining actions necessitating attention by HGS as part of the representation. VII. ATTORNEY'S FEES AND COSTS In the event of a dispute arising under this Agreement, whether or not a lawsuit or other proceeding is filed, each party shall bear their own costs and attorney's fees. Venue of any such action shall be exclusive in the state courts for Indian River County, Florida. VIII. TERMINATION Either party may terminate this Fee Agreement upon providing prior written notice to the other party at its regular place of business. All fees due and payable in accordance with this Agreement shall accrue and become payable pursuant to the terms of this Agreement through the date of termination. 112 IX. WAIVER OF POTENTIAL CONFLICTS The Client agrees and understands that HGS represents numerous landowners and businesses that have or may seek legislation and permits, land use approvals, leases, or other similar authorizations from the Client as a governmental entity which may be adverse to Client as a governmental entity. The Client understands that HGS' work for these other entities in these contexts has no bearing on, and is unrelated to, the work HGS does for Client. The Client expressly acknowledges that such representations by HGS of other entities may be currently ongoing or may arise in the future and, to the extent allowed by Rule 4-1.7, Florida Rules of Professional Conduct, does hereby waive any associated conflict that may exist. However, this conflict waiver shall not extend to or cover any representation by HGS that is adverse to the Indian River County Utilities Department or Solid Waste and Disposal District (SWDD), and HGS agrees not to represent any other entity in any matter adverse to the Indian River County Utilities Department or SWDD. Client enters into this conflict waiver only after being fully advised of the risks and advantages of representation burdened with a conflict of interest, reasonably available alternatives, and having had an opportunity to seek the advice of counsel and to raise any questions or concerns with regard to this waiver. X. PUBLIC RECORDS COMPLIANCE A. Client is a public agency subject to Chapter 119, Florida Statutes. HGS shall comply with Florida's Public Records Law. Specifically, HGS shall: (1) Keep and maintain public records required by the Client to perform the service. (2) Upon request from the Client's Custodian of Public Records, provide the Client with a copy of the requested records or allow the records to be inspected or copied within a reasonable time at a cost that does not exceed the cost provided in Chapter 119 or as otherwise provided by law. (3) Ensure that public records that are exempt or confidential and exempt from public records disclosure requirements are not disclosed except as authorized by law for the duration of the contract term and following completion of the contract if HGS does not transfer the records to the Client. 113 (4) Upon completion of the contract; transfer, at no cost, to the Client all public records in possession of HGS or keep and maintain public records required by the Client to perform the service., If HGS transfers all public records to the Client upon completion of the contract, HGS shall destroy any duplicate public records that are exempt or confidential and exempt from public records disclosure requirements. If HGS keeps and maintains public records upon completion of the contract, HGS shall meet all applicable requirements for retaining public records. All records stored electronically must be provided to the Client, upon request from the Custodian of Public Records, in a format that is compatible with the information technology systems of the Client. B. IF HGS HAS QUESTIONS REGARDING THE APPLICATION OF CHAPTER 119, FLORIDA STATUTES, TO HGS'S DUTY TO PROVIDE PUBLIC RECORDS RELATING TO THIS CONTRACT, CONTACT THE CUSTODIAN OF PUBLIC RECORDS AT: (772) 226-1424 publicrecordsAircgov.com Indian River County Office of the County Attorney 180127' Street Vero Beach, FL 32960 C. Failure of HGS to comply with these requirements shall be a material breach of this Agreement. XI. TERMINATION IN REGARDS TO F.S. 287.135: HGS certifies that it and those related entities of HGS as defined by Florida law are not on the Scrutinized Companies that Boycott Israel List, created pursuant to s. 215.4725 of the Florida Statutes, and are not engaged in a boycott of Israel. In addition, if this agreement is for goods or services of one million dollars or more, HGS certifies that it and those related entities of HGS as defined by Florida law are not on the Scrutinized Companies with Activities in Sudan List or the Scrutinized Companies with Activities in the Iran Petroleum Energy Sector List, created pursuant to Section 215.473 of the Florida. Statutes and are not engaged in business operations in Cuba or Syria. Client may terminate this Contract if HGS is found to have submitted a false certification as provided under section 287.135(5), Florida Statutes, been placed on the Scrutinized Companies with Activities in Sudan List or the Scrutinized Companies with Activities in the Iran 114 Petroleum Energy Sector List, or been engaged in business operations in Cuba or Syria, as defined by section 287.135, Florida Statutes. Client may terminate this Contract if HGS, including all wholly owned subsidiaries, majority-owned subsidiaries, and parent companies that exist for the purpose of making profit, is found to have been placed on the Scrutinized Companies that Boycott Israel List or is engaged in a boycott of Israel as set forth in section 215.4725, Florida Statutes. XII. EXECUTION OF AGREEMENT This Agreement shall be deemed fully executed upon its signing by HGS and the Client. The contract formed between HGS and the Client shall be the operational contract between the parties. XIII. ENTIRE CONTRACT This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement between the parties. Accepted and Agreed to: INDIAN RIVER COUNTY HOPPING GREEN & SAMS, P.A. LOW Vice President Its: Date: Date: 115 HOPPING GREEN & SAMS P.A. EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT POLICY The following is Hopping Green & Sams' standard expense reimbursement policy. This policy applies unless a different arrangement has been negotiated based on the unique circumstances of a particular client or matter. All expenses are billed monthly. Billings ordinarily reflect expenses for the most recent month, except where there are delays in receiving bills from third party vendors. Interest. For all statements outstanding ninety (90) days past the invoice date, simple interest at a rate of one percent (1%) per month (twelve percent per annum) will be assessed on the outstanding fees and expenses. Photocopying and Printing. In-house photocopying and printing is charged at $0.25 per page (black & white) and $.50 per page (color). Outside copying is billed as a pass-through of the outside vendor's charges. Facsimile. Outgoing facsimile transmissions are charged at $1.00 per page. There is no charge for incoming faxes. Postage. Postage is billed at actual cost. Overnight Delivery. Overnight delivery is billed at actual cost. Local Messenger Service. Local messenger service is billed at the IRS approved reimbursement rate. Computerized Legal Research. Charges for computerized legal research are billed at an amount approximating actual cost. Travel. Travel (including air fare, rental cars, taxicabs, hotel, meals, tips, etc.) is billed at actual cost. Where air travel is required, coach class is used wherever feasible. Out-of-town mileage is billed at the IRS approved reimbursement rate. Consultants. Unless prior arrangements are made, consultants are ordinarily employed directly by the client. Where consultants are employed by the firm, their charges are passed -through with no mark-up. The client is responsible for notifying the firm of any particular billing arrangements or procedures which the client requires of the consultant. Other Expenses. Other outside expenses, such as court reporters, agency copies, etc. are billed at actual cost. Word Processing and Secretarial Overtime. No charge is made for word processing. No charge is made for secretarial overtime except in major litigation matters where unusual overtime demands are imposed. Attachment A 116 8. F Office Of Consent Agenda 12/03/2019 Dylan Reingold, County Attorney William K. DeBraal, Deputy County Attorney Susan J.. Prado, Assistant county Attorney INDIAN RIVER COUNTY MEMORANDUM TO: The Board of County Commissioners ATTORNEY FROM: William K. DeBraal, Deputy County Attorney DATE: November 20, 2019 SUBJECT: Interlocal Agreement with School Board for Maintenance of Special Needs Shelter Generator at Treasure Coast Elementary School In 2006, the School Board and the County cooperatively applied for and obtained a State Grant for an emergency generator and such other equipment necessary to support the generator to provide emergency electrical service for a special needs shelter. The grant was managed by the Florida Division of Emergency Management. The generator was installed at the County's special needs shelter, Treasure Coast Elementary School, on County Road 510 in Sebastian. The 1,000 KW diesel generator is of a size and capacity to supply power to the entire school building in case of a power outage, including the air conditioning and any other medical equipment required by the special needs shelters' inhabitants. Normally, the School Board will install a much smaller generator at a school site that will operate the emergency lighting at the school during a power failure. This large generator requires monthly testing and maintenance, including replacing the diesel fuel on an annual basis. The State was responsible for the maintenance and repair of the generator equipment until February 7, 2013, at which time the warranty period expired and the County and School Board became responsible for the maintenance and have shared equally in these costs. In the fall of 2018, the fuel tank on the generator at Treasure Coast Elementary leaked, prompting an extensive fuel clean-up and replacement of the -fuel tank on a temporary and permanent basis. The cost of the repairs and fuel spill clean-up was $88,426.00 and the County's 50% share of this expense of $44,213.00 was approved by the Board at its meeting of August 13, 2019. The parties decided it would be proper to set forth the School Board's and the County's responsibilities for the generator both now and into the future. 117, The Interlocal Agreement, attached to this memorandum, provides for the following duties to be performed by the School Board: • Purchasing of Fuel to Maintain 72 Hour run time • Annual Load Bank Testing • Annual Certification of Fuel Monitoring System • Annual Fuel Cleaning and Polishing • Annual Fuel Tank Storage License Fee • Annual Fuel Storage Pollution Policy • Cost Associated with Fuel Spill Cleanup The County shall be responsible for reimbursing the School Board for 50% of all reasonable and necessary costs and expenses incurred by the School Board in performing preventative maintenance, periodic maintenance, and repair of the generator and related equipment. The annual cost for generator maintenance and repair is estimated to be $8,566.00 as evidenced by the spreadsheet attached to this memo. FUNDING: Funding for current year maintenance and repair costs will be funded via budget amendment from General Fund Reserve for Contingency, while subsequent fiscal year costs will be budgeted accordingly. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Board approve the Interlocal Agreement between the Indian River County Board of County Commissioners and the School Board of Indian River County concerning the maintenance and repair of the emergency power generator for the Special Needs Shelter at Treasure Coast Elementary School and authorize the Chairman to execute the agreement on behalf of the Board. Attachments: Exhibit "A" Interlocal Agreement Exhibit "B" Annual Cost Spreadsheet Copies to: Robert Michael, CHEM, Director of Physical Plant School District of Indian River County 118 INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE INDIAN RIVER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS AND THE SCHOOL BOARD OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY CONCERNING THE MAINTENANCE AND REPAIR OF THE EMERGENCY POWER GENERATOR FOR THE SPECIAL NEEDS SHELTER AT TREASURE COAST ELEMENTARY SCHOOL This Interlocal Agreement ("Agreement") is entered into this day of , 2019, ("Effective Date") between the Indian River County Board of County Commissioners, (hereinafter "County") and the School Board of Indian River County (the "School Board"), collectively referred to as the Parties. WHEREAS, Section 163.01, Florida Statutes, known as the "Florida Interlocal Cooperation Act of 1969," authorizes local governmental units to make the most efficient use of their powers by enabling them to cooperate with other localities on a basis of mutual advantage and thereby to provide services and facilities in a manner and pursuant to forms of governmental organization that will accord best with geographic, economic, population and other factors influencing the needs and development of local communities; and WHEREAS, Part 1 of Chapter 163, Florida Statutes permits 'public agencies" as defined in Section 163.01(3)(b), to enter into interlocal agreements with each other to. exercise jointly any power, privilege, or authority which such agencies share in common and which each might exercise separately; and WHEREAS, the Florida Legislature has found that safeguarding the life and property of its citizens by installation of a generator at special needs shelters capable of running the shelter's air conditioning system and any necessary medical devices during the times of a declared emergency is a vital part of a community's emergency preparations; and WHEREAS, in 2006 the Parties cooperatively obtained an emergency power generator, fuel tank, generator housing structure, and such other mechanical, electrical and plumbing equipment necessary to support the generator and to provide the necessary electrical service (hereinafter "Equipment") for a special needs shelter through a State Grant managed by the Florida Division of Emergency Management; and WHEREAS, the Equipment was placed at Treasure Coast Elementary School which is the County's special needs shelter; and WHEREAS, the State initially was responsible for the maintenance and repair of the Equipment until February 7, 2013, at which time the County and School Board became responsible for the maintenance and repair; and WHEREAS, the Parties wish to document their agreement for the maintenance repair of the Equipment. 119 NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises contained herein, the Parties agree as follows: Recitals The. Parties agree that the foregoing recitals are true and correct and are incorporated herein by this reference. 2. Maintenance and Repair The School Board shall perform or cause to be performed the reasonable and necessary preventative maintenance, periodic maintenance, and repair of the Equipment. This shall include, but is not limited to: Purchasing of Fuel to Maintain 72 Hour run time; Annual Load Bank Testing; Annual Certification of Fuel Monitoring System; Annual Fuel Cleaning and Polishing; Annual Fuel Tank Storage License Fee; Annual Fuel Storage Pollution Policy; and Cost Associated with Fuel Spill Cleanup. 3. Reimbursement The County shall be responsible for reimbursing the School Board for 50% of all reasonable and necessary costs and expenses incurred by the School Board in performing preventative maintenance, periodic maintenance, and repair of the Equipment. The School Board shall submit an invoice on a quarterly basis documenting all reasonable and necessary costs and expenses incurred by the School Board to the County through its Office of Management and Budget. The County may require reasonable additional documentation of costs and expenses sufficient to document the expenditures per the County's Office of Management and Budget. Reimbursement requests will normally be paid within 30 days following the County's receipt of the invoices but in no event more than 60 days unless the County formally disputes in writing some or all of the costs and expenses as set forth therein. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the County shall reimburse all undisputed costs and expenses no later than 60 days from. receipt of the invoice. If.the County disputes a cost or expense, the County shall within 15 days of receipt of the invoice provide the School Board with a written explanation of the basis of the dispute with regard to the disputed cost or expense and the Parties shall attempt to resolve the dispute in accordance with paragraph 5, below. If after examination of the generator system, the School Board recommends significant maintenance or repair beyond the normal maintenance of the system, the School Board shall provide notice of those significant repairs each year by June 30 so the County may budget for the repairs accordingly. In the event of an unforeseen major mechanical failure occurs rendering the generator unfit for service unless prompt repairs are made, the School Board shall promptly advise the County of the failure. The School Board shall effect the needed repairs advising the County of the estimated cost and upon completion of the repairs submit a final bill to the County for payment within 45 days. 120 4. Waiver and Delay No waiver or delay of any provision of this Agreement at any time will be deemed a waiver of any other provision of this Agreement at such time or will be deemed a waiver of such provision at any other time. 5. Dispute Resolution As a condition precedent to a Party bringing any suit for breach of this Agreement, that party must first notify the other Party in writing of the nature of the purported breach and seek in good faith to resolve the dispute through negotiation. If the Parties cannot resolve the dispute through negotiation, they may agree to mediation with a qualified third party acceptable to both Parties. The existence of a dispute shall not excuse the Parties from performance pursuant to this Agreement. This remedy is supplemental to any other remedies available at law. 6. Filing A copy of this Agreement shall be filed with the Clerk of the Circuit Court in and for Indian River County, Florida. 7. Force Majeure No party shall. be obligated to perform any duty, requirement or obligation under this Agreement if such performance is prevented by fire, hurricane, earthquake, explosion, wars, sabotage, accident, flood, acts of God, strikes, or other labor disputes, riot or civil commotions, or by reasons of any other matter or condition beyond the control of any Party, and which cannot be overcome by reasonable diligence and without unusual expense ("Force Majeure"). In no event shall a lack of funds on the part,of any Party be deemed Force Majeure. 8. Survival Provisions contained in this Agreement that,.by their sense and context, are intended to survive the expiration or termination of this Agreement, shall so survive. 9. Waiver of Jury Trial EACH OF THE PARTIES HERETO KNOWINGLY, VOLUNTARILY, AND INTENTIONALLY WAIVES THE RIGHT EITHER OF THEM MAY HAVE TO A TRIAL BY JURY IN RESPECT OF ANY LITIGATION BASED HEREON, OR ARISING OUT OF, UNDER OR IN CONNECTION WITH THIS AGREEMENT. 10. Indemnification Subject to the provisions and only within the limitations of Section 768.28, Florida Statutes, and without waiving sovereign immunity, the Parties recognize their 121 respective tort liability for injury or loss of property, personal injury, or death caused by the negligent or wrongful act or omission of any employee acting within the scope of the employee's office or employment. It is expressly understood that this provision shall not be construed as; i) a waiver of any right, defense or immunity that the Parties have under Chapter 768.28, Florida Statutes, or any other statute, ii) an agreement by either Party hereto to indemnify the other; or iii) consent by either Party to be sued by third. parties. Each Party covenants to maintain sufficient general liability and worker's compensation coverage, unless self-insured, regarding its respective liability, throughout the term of this Agreement. 11. Insurance The Parties warrant that they are self-insured and agree to maintain general liability insurance as required by law. The Parties further agree to provide each other with a copy of said insurance certificates, upon request. Further, the School Board shall provide a copy of the Annual Fuel Storage Pollution Policy to the County upon request. 12. Non -Discrimination The Parties shall not unlawfully discriminate against any individual on the basis of his or her race, age, religion , ancestry, color, ethnicity; gender, national origin, marital status, familial status, disability, sexual orientation, genetic information, or gender identity or expression with respect to any activity occurring or under this Agreement. 13. Modifications This Agreement may be modified or amended only by mutual written consent of the Parties. 14. Execution, Term and Termination The term of this Agreement shall commence upon the Effective Date and shall remain in effect until December 31, 2022, and shall automatically renew for 2 successive five year periods, expiring on December 31, 2032. This Agreement may be replaced or sooner by a mutually agreed upon substitute agreement. 15. Notice Any notice, request, demand, consent, approval or permitted by this Agreement shall be given or made elected by the party giving such notice, by any of delivery to the other party; or (2) Delivery by comm (3) Mailed by registered or certified mail (postage pr the addresses of the parties shown below: Indian River County: County Administrator other communication required or in writing and shall be served, as the following methods: (1) Hand rcial overnight courier service; or paid), return receipt requested at 122 1801 27th Street, Building A Vero Beach, FL, 32960 School Board: The School Board of Indian River County 6500 57th Street Vero Beach, FL 32967 16. Choice of Law and Venue The validity, interpretation, construction, and effect of this Agreement shall be in accordance with and governed by the laws of the State of Florida, only. The location for settlement of any and all claims, controversies, or disputes, arising out of or relating to any part of this Agreement, or any breach hereof, as well as any litigation between the parties, shall be Indian River County, Florida for claims brought in state court, and the Southern District of Florida for those claims justiciable in federal court. 17. Prior Agreements This Agreement incorporates and includes all prior and contemporaneous negotiations, correspondence, conversations, agreements, and understandings applicable to the matters contained herein and the parties agree that there are no commitments, agreements, or understandings concerning the subject matter of this Agreement that are not contained herein. Accordingly, it is agreed that no deviation from the terms hereof shall be predicated upon any prior representations or agreements, whether oral or written. 18. Construction/Interpretation of Agreement Each party has participated equally in the negotiation and drafting of this Agreement. In the event a court is required to interpret any provision of this agreement, the provision shall not be interpreted for or against either party upon the basis that such party was or was not the preparer of this Agreement. 19. Severability If any term or provision of this Agreement or the application thereof to any person or circumstance shall, to any extent, be held invalid or unenforceable for the remainder of this Agreement, then the application of such term or provision to persons or circumstances other than those as to which it is held invalid or unenforceable shall not be affected, and every other term and provision of this Agreement shall be deemed valid and enforceable to the extent permitted by law. 123 20. Public Record This Agreement is subject to and governed by the laws of the State of Florida, including without limitation Chapter 119, Florida Statutes, which generally makes public all records or other writings made or received by the Parties. The Parties acknowledge their legal obligation to comply with Section 119.0701, Florida Statutes. The Parties further agree not to disclose public records that are otherwise exempt, or confidential and exempt, from public record disclosure unless specifically authorized by law. To the extent either Party has any questions regarding the application of Chapter 119, Florida Statutes, to the duties and obligations to provide public records relating to this Agreement, the Party shall discuss such questions with the other Party's custodian of records. IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties hereto have executed this Agreement as of the date first written above. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY By: Susan Adams, Chairman Approved by BCC: ATTEST: Jeffrey R. Smith, Clerk of Court and Comptroller By: Deputy Clerk Approved: Jason E. Brown, County Administrator Approved as to form and legal sufficiency: William K. DeBraal, Deputy County Attorney 124 THE SCHOOL BOARD OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY 0 Laura Zorc, Chairman Date Approved: Attest: Dr. Susan Moxley, Interim Superintendent 125 S / F a 00 = 2 $ zT k / � c ƒ „ (D B % _ \ Q j \ 3 0 k & /E S In / k / / I rj < ® « 2J X z E E . [ „ G �fe \ 0 q ~ z C4 I R CL f \ x CIO} aj k < k%f// 4 co » q b ) / k \ C: CO \ \ ƒ _ / ® © { F r« e % q m � / % @ _ ± �_ } © ; / _ k ) $ $ k/ kƒ 2 2 k J < m r 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 00 0 0 0 3 a a 0 e a g S q q 3� @ S / 2 4 m 0 2 2 / uj - o x § m \ # � § / t 2 < Q)0 0(D xLjj a a (D 00 ) k (In § / k 2 \ _ © ° ■ e $ § J# 3\\ S I J 2 e~ 3 # ƒ ® k C 2 u 2»« . � e m 2=_ c c c \ « m 2 § _ $ « « 2 m w 2 c c 2 $ / k \ k [ ƒ § 7 m 2 § & @ \ c 2 « 0 \ / ; / § § k ¥ $ \ - e c - > 1 W � a { ' § m \ 2 c \ 0 q § 5 E § / k \ \ \ ƒ 2 § � k CONSENT: 12/3/19 Ofce of INDIAN RIVER COUNTY ATTORNEY Dylan Reingold, County Attorney William K. DeBraal, Deputy County Attorney Susan J. Prado, Assistant County Attorney MEMORANDUM TO: Board of County Commissioners FROM: William K. DeBraal - Deputy County Attorney DATE: November 20, 2019 SUBJECT: Resolution Canceling Taxes on a Property Purchased by the City of Fellsmere for Public Purposes The City of Fellsmere purchased a parcel of land and is presently using the property for the public purposes of stormwater retention. For this reason, a resolution has been prepared for consideration by the Board for removing the below recited property from the tax roll for ad valorem taxes for current and future years. Parcel # 31-37-00-00004-0020-00054.0 Lot 54, Block 2, Hall, Carter & James Subdivision site address: Lincoln Street, Fellsmere, Florida 32948 purchased from: Marjorie Hale Gornell nka Marjorie Lisette Hale Warranty Deed recorded in Book 3243, Page 1627 FUNDING: There is no cost associated with this item. RECOMMENDATION: Authorize the Chairman of the Board of County Commissioners to execute the Resolution to cancel current and future ad valorem taxes upon the publicly owned land, and the Clerk to send a certified copy of the Resolution to the -Tax Collector and Property Appraiser so that the current ad valorem taxes and future ad valorem taxes may be cancelled. /nhm Attachment: Resolution cc: Carole Jean Jordan - Tax Collector Wesley Davis - Property Appraiser Warren W. Dill, City Attorney, City of Fellsmere Putnam Moreman, CPA, CGFM — Finance Director 127 Parcel # 31-37-00-00004-0020-00054.0 Lot 54, Block 2, Hall, Carter & James Subdivision site address: Lincoln Street, Fellsmere, FL 32948 Purchased from Marjorie Hale Gornell nka Marjorie Lisette Hale public purposes: stormwater retention RESOLUTION NO. 2019- A RESOLUTION OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, CANCELLING CERTAIN TAXES UPON PUBLICLY OWNED LANDS, PURSUANT TO SECTION 196.28, FLORIDA STATUTES. WHEREAS, section 196.28, Florida Statutes, allows the Board of County Commissioners of each County to cancel and discharge any and all liens for taxes, delinquent or current, held or owned by the county or the state, upon lands heretofore or hereafter conveyed to or acquired by any agency, governmental subdivision, or municipality of the state, or the United States, for road purposes, defense purposes, recreation, reforestation, or other public use; and WHEREAS, such cancellation must be by resolution of the Board of County Commissioners, duly adopted and entered upon its minutes properly describing such lands and setting forth the public use to which the same are or will be devoted; and WHEREAS, upon receipt of a certified copy of such resolution, proper officials of the county and of the state are authorized, empowered, and directed i to make proper entries upon the records to accomplish such cancellation and to do all things necessary to carry out the provisions of section 196.28, F.S.; 128 RESOLUTION NO. 2019 - NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that: Any and all liens for taxes delinquent or current against the following described lands, which were purchased by the City of Fellsmere from Marjorie Hale Gornell nka Marjorie Lisette Hale, for use by the municipality for stormwater retention, are hereby cancelled pursuant to the authority of section 196.28, F.S. See Warranty Deed describing lands, recorded in Book 3243 at Page 1627, Public Records of Indian River County, Florida. The resolution was moved for adoption by Commissioner , and the motion was seconded by Commissioner , and, upon being put to a vote, the vote was as follows: Chairman Susan Adams Vice Chairman Joseph E. Flescher Commissioner Tim Zorc Commissioner Peter D. O'Bryan Commissioner Bob Solari 129 RESOLUTION NO. 2019 - The Chairman thereupon declared the resolution duly passed and adopted this day of December, 2019. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA In Susan Adams, Chairman ATTEST: Jeffrey R. Smith, Clerk of Circuit Court and Comptroller Deputy Clerk Tax Certificates Outstanding X Yes No Current Prorated Tax Received and Deposited with Tax Collector $ -0- Approved as to form and legal sufficiency: By: William K. DeBraal Deputy County Attorney 130 = r, December 3, 2019 ITEM 8 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS INTER -OFFICE MEMORANDUM TOS: Members of the Board of County Commissioners DATE: November 25, 2019 SUBJECT: Requesting approval of applicants to IRC Census 2020 Community Action Committee FROM: Chairman Susan Adams Commissioner, District 1 Discussion Item: I'd like to request the Board's approval for the first three of our IRC Census 2020 Community Action Committee volunteers, specifically Mr. Tony Brown, Ms. Alma Miller, and Ms. Julianne Price. Their resumes are included. 131 -R-ECEIVED ROV 19 2019 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY APPLICATION FOR COMMITTEE APPOINTMENT BOARD OF COUNT Y COMMISSION Last First Name, Name: Brown 1 & Middle Init: Anthony J. Today's Date: 1 11/18/19 Email Address: lbustason0yahoo.com Home Address (No P.O. Boxes): 5-7f11C1, .*z-. egeaelzFZ- Home Phone: Work Phone:17g- Cell Phone: How long have you been a resident of Indian River County? Are you a full or part time resident? Check one: Full Time 0 Part Time ❑ Please list current employer or business. If retired, please list any business experience that may be applicable to the committee. i ill H- Zk, C eaAl �(°arrsul��r�/ AtdiII . oa/ Z v�er�; Please list any licenses you presently hold: Please list any organization of which you are currently a member: Indian River NAACP Gifford Progressive Civic League Please list any other committees or boards you currently sit on: ,5u}n,6L�h'ydre, rP l /j�vrscrrr Xre,-, Continued on next page 132 Place a check mark next to the committee(s) you would like to serve on: AFFORDABLE HOUSING ADVISORY COMMITTEE r t 'i AGRICULTURE ADVISORY COMMITTEE BEACH & SHORE PRESERVATION ADVISORY COMMITTEEEl CHILDREN'S SERVICES ADVISORY COMMITTEE a CODE ENFORCEMENT BOARD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT CONSTRUCTION BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT & APPEALS El ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL HEARING BOARD INDIAN RIVER COUNTY CENSUS 2020 COMMUNITY ACTION COMMITTEE MPO BICYCLE ADVISORY COMMITTEE MPO CITIZEN ADVISORY COMMITTEE PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION SCHOOL PLANNING CITIZEN OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE TOURIST DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL TRANSPORTATION DISADVANTAGED LOCAL COORDINATING BOARD TREASURE COAST REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL — COMPREHENSIVE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY ❑ VALUE ADJUSTMENT BOARD — MUST OWN HOMESTEAD PROPERTY WITHIN INDIAN RIVER COUNTY Please print and return the completed application, along with a current resume, to the Board of County Commission office, 1801 27th Street, Vero Beach, FL. 32960, or by fax at 772-770-5334. Please note: All applications are kept on file for 6 months. -------- i Print ._ 133 Anthony I Brown Objective To promote and protect people's civil rights, health and disadvantaged communities well-being. Education Vero Beach High School, Graduated 1971. Columbia School Broadcasting, 1975-1977 National Housing Management School, 1986 Indian River State College Corrections Academy, 1983 Positions Held United States Airforce Warehouseman, GS -5 1977-1979 George State University Police Force, 1976 WAXE Radio 1370 AM, 1980-82 Florida Dept. of Corrections, 1982-86 Indian River Housing Authority, Property Manager 1986-1995 FDOH— Indian River, Environmental Consultant 2014 -present Organizations Indian River NAACP, President and Area Director Gifford Progressive Civic League Boys 2 Men Greatness Mentoring Program References Julianne Price, FDOH, 772-794-7445 Miranda Hawker, FDOH, 772-794-7452 Home Address: 4159 57th St., Vero Beach, FL 32967 Phone: 404-771-3675 Email: bustason@yahoo.com 134 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY �" CEIVED APPLICATION FOR COMMITTEE APPOINTMENT NOV 19 2019 Last Miller First Name Name: & Middle Init: Alma OOARDOF CO NTY N Today's Date: 11/18/2019 Email Address: glennandalma@gmail.com I Home Address (No P.O. Boxes): 11758 Laconia Street, Sebastian, FL 32958 Home Phone: 1772 589-6341 Work Phone: Cell Phone: 772 633-4724 How long have you been a resident of Indian River County? 20 YEARS Are you a full or part time resident? Check one: Full Time ✓I Part Time Please list current employer or business. If retired, please list any business experience that may be applicable to the committee. Please list any licenses you presently hold: Please list any organization of which you are currently a member: NAACP of Indian River Wabasso Church of God F icaac nbi any utner cornmmees or hoards you currently sit on: Board Member - Every Dream Has a Price uontinuea on next page 135 Place a check mark next to the committee(s) you would like to serve on: AFFORDABLE HOUSING ADVISORY COMMITTEE ❑ AGRICULTURE ADVISORY COMMITTEE F -1 BEACH BEACH & SHORE PRESERVATION ADVISORY COMMITTEE - ❑. CHILDREN'S SERVICES ADVISORY COMMITTEE ❑ CODE ENFORCEMENT BOARD ❑ COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT ❑ CONSTRUCTION BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT & APPEALS ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL ❑ ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL HEARING BOARD ❑ INDIAN RIVER COUNTY CENSUS 2020 COMMUNITY ACTION COMMITTEE Q MPO BICYCLE ADVISORY COMMITTEE ❑ MPO CITIZEN ADVISORY COMMITTEE ❑ PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION ❑ SCHOOL PLANNING CITIZEN OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE ❑ TOURIST DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL F -1 TRANSPORTATION TRANSPORTATION DISADVANTAGED LOCAL COORDINATING BOARD - ❑ TREASURE COAST REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL - COMPREHENSIVE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY ❑ VALUE ADJUSTMENT BOARD - MUST OWN HOMESTEAD PROPERTY WITHIN INDIAN RIVER COUNTY ❑ Please print and return the completed application, along with a current resume, to the Board of County Commission office, 1801 27th Street, Vero Beach, FL. 32960, or by fax at 772-770-5334. Please note: All applications are kept on file for 6 months. Print - 136 r ECEfV'.ED Al AnaMiller I �,�1�V 19 2019 JWARD OF COUNTY Human Services Program Specialisf°lOUSSION Contact 1758 Laconia Street Sebastian, FL 32958 772 589-6341 (H) 772 633-4724 (C) glennandalma@gmail.com Education College of St. Elizabeth 2 Convent Rd Morristown, NJ 07960 B.S. Business Administration Human Resources Objective As a former retiree, interested in opportunities to utilize my work, education and life experiences as assets to enhance community well- being. Experience Jan 1975 to June 1998 Manager • Business Card Program Manager • AT&T July 2000 to February 2013 Staff Assistant • Environmental Health • FL Dept of Health June 2017 to Present Human Svc Program Specialist • P.A.C.E. EH • FL Dept of Health Health Department Liaison to encourage, empower and ensure improved health and wellness for residents of underserved communities in Indian River County. Key Skills I Communication Project Management Budget Planning Marketing Public Speaking Excellent verbal and written communication skills demonstrated by frequent moderator for community and faith -based events; compose documentation for organization reports, work plans and meeting minutes. Leadership • NAACP of Indian River Executive Board — Health Chair and Economic Development & Housing Co -Chair • Board Member—affordable housing nonprofit • Board Secreta!y..— Indian River HIV/AIDS Awareness Network References: Julianne. Renk Price, Sr. Analyst— FL Dept of Health Indian River 772 794-4775 137 RECEIVED NOV 19 2014 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY APPLICATION FOR COMMITTEE APPOINTMENT BOARD OF•C0UNTY COMMISSION Last "j First Name , Name: Price I & Middle Init::-KKPi , Today's Date: 11/18/19 Email Address: Julianne.Price gflhealth.gov� Home Address (No P.O. Boxes): 2179 10th Ave. Vero Beach, FL 32960 Home Phone: 772-713-688 Work Phone: a Z—y Cell Phone: How long have you been a resident of Indian River County? 16 years Are you a full or part time resident? Check one: Full Time ❑✓ Part Time ❑ Please list current employer or business. If retired, please list any business experience that may be applicable to the committee. F—V C -e- (KO Please list any licenses you presently hold: Please list any organization of which you are currently a member: Indian River NAACP Please list any other committees or boards you currently sit on: %, 6 AXI-bk 1ti nued on next page 138 Place a check mark next to the committee(s) you would like to serve on: AFFORDABLE HOUSING ADVISORY COMMITTEE AGRICULTURE ADVISORY COMMITTEE BEACH & SHORE PRESERVATION ADVISORY COMMITTEE CHILDREN'S SERVICES ADVISORY COMMITTEE CODE ENFORCEMENT BOARD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT CONSTRUCTION BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT & APPEALS ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL ❑ ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL HEARING BOARD INDIAN RIVER COUNTY CENSUS 2020 COMMUNITY ACTION COMMITTEE a MPO BICYCLE ADVISORY COMMITTEE MPO CITIZEN ADVISORY COMMITTEE PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION SCHOOL PLANNING CITIZEN OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE TOURIST DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL TRANSPORTATION DISADVANTAGED LOCAL COORDINATING BOARD TREASURE COAST REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL — COMPREHENSIVE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY VALUE ADJUSTMENT BOARD — MUST OWN HOMESTEAD PROPERTY WITHIN INDIAN RIVER COUNTY Please print and return the completed application, along with a current resume, to the Board of County Commission office, 1801 27th Street, Vero Beach, FL. 32960, or by fax at 772-770-5334. Please note: All applications are kept on file for 6 months. Print 139 RECEIV;E111 Julianne Price, R. S. IN1:OV 19 2019 2179 10t" Ave. Vero Beach, FL 32960 BOARD OF COU1%r1`3, 772-71.3-6883 Cell/772-794-7445 Work cQM"kirs's1o>r•: Julianne.Price@flhealth.gov Education I attended the University of North Carolina at Asheville and earned a Bachelor of Science Degree in Environmental Studies with a Natural Resource Management Focus. I have taken master level courses from USF and am a graduate of the Center for Disease Control's Environmental Public Health Leadership Institute. Licenses/certifications I hold certifications from the Florida Department of Health in food service, biomedical waste, and onsite sewage and disposal to include permitting and inspections. I also am accredited as a Registered Sanitarian (R.S.) and am part of the emergency response strike team for FL. Professional Experience I have been employed by the Florida Department of Health in Indian River (DOH -IR) since January 2004, initially as an Environmental Specialist. Currently, l am a Community Health Improvement Manager for DOH -IR. My duties are extensive, but generally pertain to community health improvement planning and serving as the Statewide PACE EH Coordinator for the Florida Department of Health since 2006. Additionally, I founded and am President of a nonprofit housing organization called Every Dream Has A Price,.lnc. in Feb. 2008. I've completed numerous projects such has building homes in a day and working on over 250 home rehab. projects for people in need. Publications and Research I have been involved in securing over $40 million of grants for communities in FL. Please view the Indian River County link at: hqp://www.floridahealth.eovlhealthy-environments/pace-eh/index.htmi Florida Journal of. Environmental Health, June 2005 Florida Journal of Environmental Health, June 2004 Florida Journal of Environmental Health, April 2007 Journal of Environmental Health; May 2008, Sept. 2009, April 2012, October 2013 Awards "Rookie of the Year," August 2006, Florida Environmental Health Association "Jim Parker Award," June 2005, NACCHO-ASTHO The Jim Parker Award recognizes and encourages initiatives to establish and improve collaboration between state and local health departments. 5 Davis Productivity Awards, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2012 Featured in the Public Health Grand Rounds, May 2007 Harvard's Bright Idea Award for Innovation "Complete award listing available upon request" Professional organizations and community service National Environmental Health Association, since 2008 Indian River County Affordable Housing Advisory Committee, Chairwoman Every Dream Has .A Price, President, since Feb. 2008 Keep Indian River Beautiful, Board Member, 2009-2010 NACCHO Environmental Health Advisory Board Chair since June 2013 -June 2018 "Complete list of organization and community service available upon request" 140 ircgov.com l2 3 f l Page 6 of 10 8-d . The Indian River County Board of County Commissioners has created the Indian River County Census 2020 Community Action Committee. The goals of a Complete Count Committee are to: - Make everyone in the community aware of Census 2020; and - Motivate the community to participate in the census by filling out the census form and returning it immediately. The committee will be active until June 2020. The committee will have fifteen members as follows: • One representative from the Board of County Commissioners • Two representatives from the Gifford area • One representative from the Oslo area • One representative from the Wabasso area • One representative from the Fellsmere area • One representative from the School Board { • One representative from the City of Vero Beach appointed by the city council • One representative from the City of Sebastian appointed by the city council • One representative for City of Fellsmere appointed by the city council • One representative for Town of Indian River Shores appointed by the town council • One representative from Town of Orchid appointed by the town council • One representative from a local business • One representative from a local faith -based organization • One representative from the local media We invite interested individuals to submit a committee application (http://www.ircgov.com/Boards/Committee_Application.pdf) which can be found on the County's Boards and Committees webpage (http://www.ircgov.com/Boards/index.htmj. Public Notice - CDBG Program Available Housing Assistance (Public_Notices/CDBG_Applicant_pdf) T RD - t http://www.ircgov.com/ 12/2/2019 (0-,/�r I. INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA MEMORANDUM TO: Jason E. Brown; County Administrator THROUGH: Roland Deblois AICP Community Development Director THROUGH: Bill Schutt, AICP Chief; Long Range Planning FROM: Matt Kalap Long Range Planner DATE: November 19, 2019 RE: County Initiated Request to Amend the 5 Year Capital Improvements Program and Supporting Data and Analysis of the Capital Improvements Element of the Comprehensive Plan for the Period FY 2019/20 —2023/24. Plan Amendment Number: CPTA 2019080183-85311 It is requested that the following information be given formal consideration by the Board of County Commissioners at its regular meeting of December 3, 2019. BACKGROUND On February 13, 1990, Indian River County adopted its comprehensive plan. As required by state law, all development activities must be consistent with the comprehensive plan, and all county activities must conform to plan policies. Occasionally, the plan must be updated to reflect the latest and best available information and to address changed conditions. Additionally, the plan must periodically be reviewed and revised in order to reflect the community's changing needs and desires. While state law allows local governments to amend their comprehensive plans periodically, there is no requirement that local governments annually update their comprehensive plan, except for the Capital Improvements Element. The Capital Improvements Element (CIE) of the plan is different from the other plan elements. Unlike the other elements, the CIE must be amended every year. This is required both by plan policy and by state regulations. During the 2011 session, the legislature made various changes to state growth management rules, 141 and some of the changes relate to Capital Improvements Element requirements. Among the changes brought about by enactment of House Bill 7207 (Chapter 2011-139, Laws of Florida), one eliminated the financial feasibility requirement of the Capital Improvements Program (CIP), while another added a requirement that the Capital Improvements Program list those projects that are necessary to maintain locally established level of service standards; identify projects as fully funded or unfunded, and give projects a level of priority for funding. With those amendments, the state legislature preserved the ability of local governments to amend their Capital Improvements Program through a more direct and accelerated process than most other comprehensive plan amendments. According to state law, amendments to the Capital Improvements Program schedule and its supporting data and analysis may be accomplished by following local government ordinance adoption/amendment procedures. Those procedures require only one adoption hearing, while other types of comprehensive plan amendments must be processed through the state's "Expedited Amendment" process, which involves multiple public hearings and several months of review. Consistent with state requirements, County staff has prepared the annual update of the County's existing Capital Improvements Element. A copy of the draft updated CIE is attached. Even though state statute no longer requires that local Capital Improvements Programs be financially feasible, the County's Capital Improvements Program is financially feasible. Because this CIE amendment is a complete update of the 5 year Capital Improvements Program and its supporting data and analysis, all related tables, charts, graphs and associated text were updated. Updates are shown with strike thr-eug and underlines and are limited to the text and tables of the CIE. Adding strike through and underlines to the charts, graphs, and entire appendices would have made the length of the document excessive and the resulting document confusing. Consequently, those items have been updated without strike-throughs and underlining. ANALYSIS In revising the 5 Year Capital Improvements Program and supporting data and analysis, staff used much the same methodology as it employed in preparing the original version. That involved coordinating with the budget and finance departments to obtain data on past revenues and expenditures as well as forecasted future revenue and expenditure amounts. Also, each county department was contacted to determine the status of its capital improvements program. For each department, information on completed projects, proposed projects, costs, revenues, prioritization, and other factors was collected. Projects were then reviewed by the budget department and revised as necessary to ensure financial feasibility. Based upon those data, planning staff revised the various tables and the text of the 5 Year Capital Improvements Program and supporting data and analysis. The result of those changes is an accurate, financially feasible, and up-to-date capital improvements program. Proposed Changes to the Capital Improvements Element 142 0 Capital Improvements Program Appendix A of the CIE (Attachment 4) is the County's proposed Capital Improvements Program (CIP). It lists all programmed capital improvements for fiscal years 2019/20 through 2023/24. Within the CIP, each project was selected based upon need and the County's financial ability to fund it. As shown within the CIP, the total cost for all of the projects for the next five fiscal years is $390,169,564. That is $54,356,238 more than the $335,813,326 cost of the current (last) five year CIP and represents a 16.19% increase. Much of this increase reflects increases from existing county funding sources and from external sources due to increased development activity and continually improving market conditions. Those funding sources include assessments and user fees, gas taxes, impact fees, local option sales taxes, developer contributions, and the Florida Department of Transportation. As structured, the CIP consists of ten separate categories, with dedicated funding sources listed after each project. The ten separate categories are: Coastal Management, Conservation and Aquifer Recharge, Emergency Services, Facilities Management, Law Enforcement and Corrections, Parks and Recreation, Sanitary Sewer and Potable Water, Solid Waste, Stormwater Management, and Transportation. A comparison of the existing (last) 5 year CIP expenses by category to the proposed 5 year CIP expenses by category appears on page 5 of this agenda item. Coastal Management Planned coastal management projects occurring within the next five years include beach nourishment in sector 3, sector 5, and sector 7 of the coastline. Those projects will be funded by the Federal Emergency Management Agency, Florida Department of Environmental Protection, and the County's beach restoration fund. The total expenditure amount for the projects within this category for fiscal years 2019/20 through 2023/24 is $25,000,000, representing 6.41% of the overall CIP expenditure within the next 5 years. Conservation and Aquifer Recharge For conservation capital projects, the focus is on improvements to conservation lands. Those improvements include construction of passive recreational access facilities such as boardwalks, kayak launches, associated improvements such as parking and restroom facilities, and projects to stabilize/improve/preserve historic structures. These projects will be funded from numerous sources including: environmental land bonds, grants, optional sales tax, boating improvement funds, upland mitigation funds, Windsor property exchange donation, and park impact fees. The total expenditure amount for the projects within this category for fiscal years 2019/20 through 2023/24 is $11,239,398, representing 2.88% of the overall CIP. 143 Emergency Services For the next five fiscal years, emergency services capital projects total $19,216,635 and represent 4.93% of the overall CIP. Proposed projects within this category include but are not limited to acquisition of multiple ambulances (med units), fire engines, tankers, brush trucks, replacement of Emergency Services Station 7, and construction of new Emergency Services Station 15. Funding for these improvements comes from impact fees, one -cent local optional sales tax, and emergency services district millage. Parks and Recreation Capital improvements projects related to recreation and open space include improvements to existing recreation areas such as Victor Hart Sr. Complex (fka Gifford Park), Hosie -Schuman Park, Hobart Park, 58th Avenue ballfields, and County Fairgrounds. All of the recreation and open space projects identified in Appendix A will be paid for with one -cent local option sales tax revenue, golf club user fees, general fund loan, Windsor fund, Fairgrounds improvement fund, 16th Street Ballfield sale funds, and impact fees. The expenditures within this category for fiscal years 2019/20 through 2023/24 total $11,989,997, representing 3.07% of the overall CIP. Facilities Management As listed within Appendix A, facilities management capital improvements projects represent 4.63% of the overall CIP for fiscal years 2019/20 through 2023/24 and total $18,060,000. These projects include improvements such as construction of new courtroom facilities, acquisition of land for future buildings, Building B expansion, LED lighting, fiber optic cable connectivity, library renovations, North County Library expansion, and costs for replacement of various county building roofs. The projects will be funded through various sources, including one cent local option sales tax revenue, impact fees, and building department fund. Law Enforcement and Corrections Planned law enforcement and corrections capital improvements projects include development of corrections medical housing and corrections recreation yard expansion, and a sheriff facility expansion needs design. These projects will be funded by impact fees and one cent local option sales tax revenue. The total amount of expenditures for projects within this category for fiscal years 2019/20 through 2023/24 is $9,005,000, representing 2.31 % of the overall CIP and representing an 7.66% decrease in cost over last year's law enforcement and corrections 5 year CIP. Sanitary Sewer and Potable Water Within the next five years, there are potable water and sanitary sewer capital improvements projects planned at various locations within the county. Projects planned for fiscal years 2019/20 through 144 2023/24 include construction of several water mains (new and replacement), North County (Sebastian) septic to centralized sewer conversions, meter conversions to an Advanced Metering Infrastructure (AMI) system, and south waste water treatment facility improvements. The potable water and wastewater projects will be funded through one cent local option sales tax, user fees, grants, assessments, and capacity charges. The sanitary sewer and potable water category accounts for 20.92% of the overall CIP, or $81,630,549, during the five year CIP time period. Solid Waste In the next five years, solid waste capital improvements will involve expansion of Cell III of Segment 3 of the landfill, a new single stream recycling building, new automated scale system, emergency access roadways, and site drainage improvements at the landfill. These improvements total $14,300,000 during the five year CIP time period, account for 3.67% of the overall CIP, and representing an 44.44% increase in cost over last year's solid waste 5 year CIP. Projects in the proposed 5 year CIP will be funded by assessments and user fees. Stormwater Management For stormwater management, capital improvements include construction of a canal treatment system in the North Relief Canal, Osprey Acres Floway and Nature Preserve, and East Gifford Stormwater Improvements. The stormwater management projects identified in Appendix A will be paid for with one -cent local option sales tax revenue, grant funds, stormwater MSBU funds, and Vero Lake Estates assessments. The expenditures within this category for fiscal years 2019/20 through 2023/24 total $15,425,000, representing 3.95% of the overall CIP. Transportation As the costliest CIP category, transportation includes intersection improvements, road widenings, sidewalk installations, turn lanes, paving, and related projects throughout the county. Generally, capital improvements to county maintained roads are funded by traffic impact fees, the County's one cent local option sales tax revenue, and gas tax revenue, while sidewalks are funded through grants, one cent local option sales tax revenue, and gas tax revenue. Some expenditures for roads are also funded by the State of Florida, developers, and grants. Overall, the transportation category expenditures represent nearly half (47.24%) of the entire five year CIP and totals $184,302,985, an amount which is $11,716,535 more than last year's five year transportation CIP of $172,586,450. Comparison of Existing (Last) 5 Year CIP Expenses by Category to Proposed 5 Year CIP Expenses by Category Category FY 2018/19-2022/23 FY 2019/20-2023/24 Difference $ Difference % Coastai Management N/A $25,000,000 $25,000,000 N/A 145 Conservation & Aquifer Recharge $6,599,381 $11,239,398 $4,640,017 70.31% Emergency Services $20,673,635 $19,216,635 -$1,457,000 -7.05% General Services/Facilities Management $18,059,182 $18,060,000 $818 0.00 % Law Enforcement & Corrections $9,695,000 $9,005,000 -$690,000 -7.12 % Recreation & Open Space $9,803,718 $11,989,997 $2,186,279 22.30% Sanitary Sewer & Potable Water $65,209,250 $81,630,549 $16,421,299 25.18% Solid Waste $9,900,000 $14,300,000 $4,400,000 44.44% Stormwater Management $23,286,710 $15,425,000 -$7,861,710 -33.76% Transportation $172,586,450 $184,302,985 $11,716,535 6.79% Total $335,813,326 $390,169,564 $54,356,238 16.19% Project. Modifications With the improved economy, County revenue increased in Fiscal Year 2019/20. For all funding sources except "other sources", County revenue is expected to continue to slowly increase through Fiscal Year 2023/24 above what was previously forecasted in the prior year's Capital Improvements Program. With this year's update, some projects have had their time frames extended, some have had their funding sources changed as priorities have shifted, and projects previously underfunded have been designated to receive additional projected funding. While some project time frames have been extended, none of the extensions will impact development project concurrency reservations. By extending the time frame of transportation projects, the County can utilize its limited resources to complete priority concurrency related projects within the overall capital improvements program. In effect, the County can delay some projects so that other projects will remain fundable and so that additional priority projects may be funded. By funding necessary projects and other priority projects, and by extending the time frames for other projects, the County is maintaining a financially feasible capital improvements element. Financial Feasibility Although state statute no longer requires local capital improvements programs to be financially 146 feasible, Indian River County's CIP is financially feasible. Overall, the CIP includes a summary of revenues and expenditures. The revenue and expenditure summary is included to demonstrate the financial feasibility of the CIP. That summary is included on page 20 of Appendix A of the CIP (see Attachment 4) and shows that, in fact, the County's Capital Improvements Program is financially feasible over the 5 year period by balancing revenues and expenditures. Indian River Lagoon Proiects At the August 16, 2016 Board of County Commissioners meeting, the Board directed staff to commit to spending 20% of the proceeds of the first five years of the extended one -cent local option sales tax on lagoon -related projects, if the tax was renewed by the voters in November 2016. On November 8, 2016, Indian River County residents voted to extend the one -cent local option sales tax effective January 1, 2020 through December 31, 2034. Consequently, the County has a goal of spending 20% of the one cent optional sales tax proceeds on lagoon -related projects for the first five years of the extension, starting with January 1, 2020 and ending with December 31, 2024 (FY 2019/20 — 2024/25). With the approval of the extension of the one -cent local option sales tax, the proposed 5 year Capital Improvements Program schedule allocates at least 20% of projected one -cent local option sales tax revenue to lagoon related projects during the portion of the FY 2019/20 —2023/24 period covered by the proposed plan. As proposed, the CIP directly allocates $19,051,603 out of a total of approximately $96 million (adjusted for start of sales tax extension) in projected one -cent local option sales tax revenue to lagoon related projects from Fiscal Years 2019/20 through 2023/24. For this CIE, the 20% applies to 60% of Fiscal Year 2019/20 one -cent local option sales tax revenue (Fiscal year starts on October I st 2019, sales tax reservation starts January 1' 2020) and 100% of the one -cent local option sales tax revenue for Fiscal Years 2019/20-2023/24. The 20% allocation is within the Stormwater Management, Conservation, Parks and Recreation, and Sanitary Sewer and Potable Water sections of the CIP. The lagoon benefiting projects listed in those sections of the proposed Capital Improvements Element include the following: • Hallstrom Farmstead water, sewer, restrooms • North Sebastian Sewer Phase 2A design, engineering and CEI • North Sebastian Sewer Phase 2B design, engineering and CEI • Floravan Shores Septic to Sewer, engineering • Sebastian Highlands Septic to Sewer Unit 2 and Unit 5 design and engineering • Miscellaneous lagoon projects • Lost Tree Islands restoration, replanting • Captain Forester Hammock Preserve wetland restoration, dock replacement • Indian River Lagoon Greenway wetland restoration/water quality improvement project 147 Jones Pier public access improvements, wetland creation, shoreline enhancement Dale Wimbrow Park and Donald MacDonald Campground Septic to Sewer improvement/campground enhancement Fairgrounds Ag Pavilion, improvements to wastewater In addition to the above listed lagoon benefiting projects of the proposed CIP, there are numerous projects with secondary benefits to the lagoon listed in the Transportation section of the proposed CIP. Those projects include certain road projects that will treat run-off from older improvements that currently provide no treatment. The projects listed in the Transportation section are proposed to be funded in part through the one -cent local option sales tax. Notes are included in the CIP sections indicating specific projects with additional Indian River Lagoon benefits. • Existing Conditions and Analysis Sections In addition to the changes made to Appendix A, all of the data in the existing conditions and analysis sections of the CIE have been updated to reflect current conditions. Those data include past revenue and expenditure figures for county operations as well as forecasted revenue and expenditure figures. • Concurrency Management Section Indian River County maintains a record of building permits issued to owners of parcels/lots. Those records are maintained as part of the County's concurrency management system. As permits are issued, county staff enters development impact information on those lots into the concurrency management system and subtracts the public facility capacity utilized from available capacities within the concurrency management system. Data from that system were used to assess the need for capital projects and inclusion in the proposed CIE update. Consistency with the Comprehensive Plan Comprehensive plan amendment requests are reviewed for consistency with all applicable policies of the comprehensive plan. As per section 800.07(1) of the county code, the comprehensive plan may be amended only in such a way as to preserve the internal consistency of the plan. The goals, objectives and policies are the most important parts of the comprehensive plan. Policies are statements in the plan that identify the actions which the county will take in order to direct the community's development. As courses of action committed to by the county, policies provide the basis for all county land development decisions. While all comprehensive plan policies are important, some have more applicability than others in reviewing plan amendment requests. Of particular applicability for this amendment request is the following policy: • Future Land Use Element Policy 14.3 148 The most important policy to consider in evaluating a plan amendment request for consistency with the county's comprehensive plan is future land use element policy 14.3. This policy requires that at least one of four criteria be met in order to approve a comprehensive plan amendment request. Those criteria are: ■ a mistake in the approved plan; ■ an oversight in the approved plan; ■ a substantial change in circumstances affecting the subject property; or ■ a swap or a reconfiguration of land uses at separate sites. In this case, the proposed amendment to the CIE meets the third criterion of policy 14.3 of the future land use element. Since the CIE was last revised, some capital improvements have been completed, others have been added, revenue projections have changed, and priorities have been modified. Those circumstances warrant the amendment. • Capital Improvements Element Policies 1.1, 1.2, 1.3, 1.5, 1.10, and 1.11 Capital improvements element policies 1. 1, 1.2, 1.3, 1.5, 1.10 and 1.11 require the County to maintain and implement a capital improvements program which is evaluated and updated periodically. Those policies also describe how the county will evaluate and prioritize capital improvements. By updating the capital improvements program in accordance with those requirements, the proposed amendment is consistent with those policies. • Capital Improvements Element Policy 1.9 Capital improvements element policy 1.9 states that the county shall include all capital expenditures in excess of $100,000 in its schedule of improvements. Since the proposed CIE update amendment identifies all capital expenditures in excess of $100,000, the proposed amendment is consistent with capital improvements element policy 1.9. While the referenced policies are particularly applicable to this request, other comprehensive plan policies and objectives also have relevance. For that reason, staff evaluated the proposed amendment for consistency with all applicable plan policies and objectives. Based upon that analysis, staff determined that the proposed amendment is consistent with the comprehensive plan. RECOMMENDATION Based on the analysis conducted, staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners approve the update to the 5 Year Capital Improvements Program for the period FY 2019/20-2023/24 and supporting data and analysis of the Capital Improvements Element (CIE) of the Comprehensive Plan by adopting the attached ordinance. 149 ATTACHMENTS 1.) Comprehensive Plan Text Amendment Application 2.) Comprehensive Plan Text Amendment Adoption Ordinance (Clean version of CIE on File in BCC Office) 3.) Strike Through and Underline Version of CIE 4.) 5 Year Schedule of Capital Improvements F:\Community Development\Comprehensive Plan Text Amendments\CIE\2019\BCC item\BCC Adoption Item - 2019 CIE Clean.doc 150 Capital Improvements APPLICATION FORM Element Amendment COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TEXT AMENDMENT (CPTA) INDIAN RIVER COUNTY Planning Division accepts Comprehensive Plan Text Amendment applications only during the months of January and July of each year (except that Capital Improvements Element Amendments may be initiated by the County anytime during the year in accordance with Florida Statutes, Section 163.3177(3)(b)). Each application must be complete when,.,. submitted and must include all required attachments. An incomplete apptica_tionywil1inot . be processed and will be returned to the applicant. Assigned Project Number: CPTA - Signature of Owner or Agent: Please attach the following items to this application. Do not ignore any of the following items. Indicate "N/A" if an item is not applicable. What is the proposed amendment's citation in the Comprehensive Plan? Include the element or sub -element, page number, and if applicable, the objective and policy number(s). Capital Improvements Element — various changes to entire element for annual update. 2. What is the exact language proposed to be added and/or deleted from the plan? Numerous changes for annual update. 3. What is the purpose of the request? Annual update. 4. What is the justification for the request? Change in conditions. Provide an analysis of the proposed amendment's consistency with all applicable goals, objectives, and policies of the comprehensive plan. NA 6. Provide an analysis of the proposed amendment's impact on public facilities and services. NA 7. Provide an analysis of the proposed amendment's environmental impacts. NA 8. Provide a check, money order or cash in the amount of NA , made payable to Indian River County. THE APPLICANT MUST ATTEND A PRE -APPLICATION CONFERENCE WITH LONG-RANGE PLANNING SECTION STAFF PRIOR TO APPLYING. FACommunity Development\Comprehensive Plan Text Amendments\CO20I MPTA FORM:doc 151 Attachment 1 Current Owner/Applicant Agent Name: Indian River County Board of County Commissioners Community Development-_ Department Staff Complete Mailing Address: 180127" Street, Vero Beach, FL 32960-3365 Same Phone # (including area code (772) 226 —1243 Same Fax #(including area code 772 978 —1806 Same E -Mail: Contact Person: Bill Schutt Signature of Owner or Agent: Please attach the following items to this application. Do not ignore any of the following items. Indicate "N/A" if an item is not applicable. What is the proposed amendment's citation in the Comprehensive Plan? Include the element or sub -element, page number, and if applicable, the objective and policy number(s). Capital Improvements Element — various changes to entire element for annual update. 2. What is the exact language proposed to be added and/or deleted from the plan? Numerous changes for annual update. 3. What is the purpose of the request? Annual update. 4. What is the justification for the request? Change in conditions. Provide an analysis of the proposed amendment's consistency with all applicable goals, objectives, and policies of the comprehensive plan. NA 6. Provide an analysis of the proposed amendment's impact on public facilities and services. NA 7. Provide an analysis of the proposed amendment's environmental impacts. NA 8. Provide a check, money order or cash in the amount of NA , made payable to Indian River County. THE APPLICANT MUST ATTEND A PRE -APPLICATION CONFERENCE WITH LONG-RANGE PLANNING SECTION STAFF PRIOR TO APPLYING. FACommunity Development\Comprehensive Plan Text Amendments\CO20I MPTA FORM:doc 151 Attachment 1 ORDINANCE NO. 2019 - AN ORDINANCE OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AMENDING THE TEXT OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN'S CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT BY UPDATING THE COUNTY'S 5 YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM (CIP) SCHEDULE AND RELATED DATA AND ANALYSIS SECTIONS; AND PROVIDING SEVERABILITY AND EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners adopted the Indian River County Comprehensive Plan on February 13, 1990, and WHEREAS, F.S. 163.3177(3)(b) requires an annual review and update of the County's Capital Improvements Program; and WHEREAS, F.S. 163.3177(3)(b) exempts amendments to the County's 5 year CIP from the standard comprehensive plan amendment process and instead allows the County to amend the County's 5 year CIP schedule and related data and analysis sections by ordinance through the County's standard ordinance adoption procedures, which involve holding only one public hearing; and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County, pursuant to F.S.125.66(2), advertised for a Public Hearing to Consider Adopting an Ordinance Amending the County's 5 year CIP schedule and related data and analysis sections of the Capital Improvements Element of the Comprehensive Plan; and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County held an Adoption Public Hearing on December 3rd, 2019, at which parties in interest and citizens were heard; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida, that: SECTION 1. Amendment to the Schedule of Capital Improvements Program Indian River County hereby adopts the 5 year CIP schedule and related data and analysis section of the Capital Improvements Element; (Exhibit A). SECTION 2. Financial Feasibility The Board of County Commissioners finds that the proposed amendment of the 5 Attachment 2 152 ORDINANCE NO. 2019 - year CIP schedule and related data and analysis section of the Capital Improvements Element is financially feasible. SECTION 3. Repeal of Conflicting Provisions All previous ordinances, resolutions, or motions of the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida, which conflict with the provisions. of this ordinance are hereby repealed to the extent of such conflict. SECTION 5. Severability It is declared to be the intent of the Board of County Commissioners that, if any provision of this ordinance is for any reason finally held invalid or unconstitutional by any court of competent jurisdiction, such provision shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision and such holding shall not affect the validity of the remaining provisions. SECTION 6. Effective Date A certified copy of this ordinance shall be filed with the Department of State by the clerk of the Board of County Commissioners within 10 days of enactment by the Board of County Commissioners and shall take effect upon filing with the Department of State. This ordinance was advertised in the Press -Journal on the 171' day of November, 2019, for a public hearing held on the 3rd day of December, 2019, at which time it was moved for adoption by Commissioner , seconded by Commissioner , and adopted by the following vote: Susan Adams, Chairman Joseph E. Flescher, Vice Chairman Bob Solari, Commissioner Tim Zorc, Commissioner Peter D. O'Bryan, Commissioner BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY Susan Adams, Chairman 153 ORDINANCE NO. 2019 - ATTEST: Jeffrey R. Smith, Clerk of Court and Comptroller BY: Deputy Clerk This ordinance was filed with the Department of State on the following date: APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGAL SUFFICIENCY Dylan Reingold, County Attorney APPROVED AS TO PLANNING MATTERS Roland M. DeBlois, AICP Community Development Director FACommunity Development\Comprehensive Plan Text Amendments\CIE\2019\Ordinance\Ordinance - CIE 2019.doc 154 Indian River County 2030 Comprehensive Plan Chaster 6 111:1011111 Indian River County Community Development Department Supplement #_; Adopted December _, 2019, Ordinance 2019 - Exhibit A 155 TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Figures..................................................:..................................................................................... as Listof Tables......................................................................................................................................... iii Introduction............................................................................................................................................1 ExistingConditions................................................................................................................................2 FinancialResources........................................................................................................................... 2 Expenditures....................................................................................................................................18 ExistingOutstanding Debt...............................................................................................................21 Local Policies and Practices............................................................................................................22 Analysis................................................................................................................................................ 26 Analysis of the Timing and Location of Capital Improvements...................................................... 26 NeedsAssessment............................................................................................................................31 FiscalAssessment............................................................................................................................33 Fiscal Assessment Summary...........................................................................................................37 Concurrency Management Plan.......................................................................................................... 37 ProjectApplicability........................................................................................................................38 ServiceStandards.............................................................................................................................38 Demand.............................................................................................:.............................................. 39 Availabilityof Capacity...................................................................................................................41 Regulation........................................................................................................................................ 44 MonitoringSystem..........................................................................................................................44 Applicability....................................................................................................................................45 Goal, Objectives and Policies..............................................................................................................46 Implementation, Evaluation, and Monitoring...................................................................................... 55 Implementation................................................................................................................................ 55 Evaluation and Monitoring Procedures........................................................................................... 57 APPENDIXA: Five Year Schedule of Capital Improvements.............................................................. A APPENDIX B: 2040 Roadway Improvement Plan............................................................................... B APPENDIX C: School District of Indian River County Capital Improvements Schedule .................... C APPENDIXD: School District oflndian River County Summary of Estimated Revenue .................... D Community Development Department Adopted December _, 2019, Ordinance 2019-_ Indian River County 156 Figure Title Page Figure 6.1 Ad Valorem Taxes (Property Taxes)............................................................................. 3 Figure6.2 Enterprise Funds........................................................................................................... 3 Figure 6.3 User Fees and Charges.......................................................... Figure 6.4 Special Assessments............................................................... Figure 6.5 Impact Fees............................................................................ Figure 6.6 Local Discretionary Sales Surtax .......................................... Figure 6.7 Tourist Development Tax ....................................................... Figure 6.8 Local Option Fuel Tax........................................................... Figure 6.9 Franchise Fee/Tax................................................................. Figure 6.10 Local Government Half -Cent Sales Tax .............................. Figure 6.11 County Revenue Sharing ...................................................... Figure 6.12 Constitutional Fuel Tax ....................................................... Figure 6.13 County Fuel Tax................................................................... Figure 6.14 Alcoholic Beverage License Tax .......................................... Figure 6.15 Mobile Home License Tax .................................................... Figure 6.17 General Government Expenditures by Function ................. Figure 6.18 Future Capital Improvements Expenditures ........................ Community Development Department Adopted December _, 2019, Ordinance 2019-_ ......................... 4 ......................... 4 ......................... 5 ......................... 6 ......................... 7 ......................... 9 ....................... 10 ....................... 13 ....................... 14 ....................... 15 ....................... 15 ....................... 16 ....................... 16 ....................... 20 ....................... 35 Indian River County 157 Table Title Page Table 6.1: Indian River County Revenue Sources(FY2017118)................................................... 2 Table 6.2: Optional Tourist Taxes on Transient Rental Facilities ................................................. 8 Table 6.3: Local Fuel Tax Rates.................................................................................................. 10 Table 6.4: Indian River County General Revenues By Source ..................................................... 17 Table 6.5: Indian River County General Government Expenditures By Function ....................... 18 Table 6.6: Indian River County Existing Long Term Debt........................................................... 22 Table 6.7: Overall General Revenue Projection Summary.......................................................:.. 28 Table 6.8: Earmarked Projected Revenue by Comprehensive Plan Element ............................... 29 Table 6.9: Indian River County Tax Base and Millage Projections ............................................. 30 Table 6.10: Future Capital Improvement Expenditures for Indian River County &.................... 31 Table 6.11: Indian River County Overall General Expenditures Projection Summary ............... 33 Table 6.12: Projected Expenses for Water, Sewer, and Solid Waste ........................................... 34 Table 6.13: Indian River County Overall Operating Cost Projections ........................................ 34 Table 6.14: Indian River County Estimated Ability to Raise Bonds Without A Public Vote........ 35 Table 6.15 Indian River County Bond Schedule........................................................................... 36 Table 6.16: Service Level Measures for Concurrency Related Facilities .................................... 39 Table 6.17: Monitoring System Design........................................................................................ 44 Table 6.18: Monitoring System Tasks........................................................................................... 45 Table 6.19: Capital Improvement Element Implementation Matrix ............................................. 55 Table 6.20: Capital Improvements Element Evaluation Matrix ................................................... 58 Community Development Department Adopted December _, 2019, Ordinance 2019-. Indian River County 158 159 The Capital Improvements Element (CIE) summarizes the needed capital facilities identified in the county's comprehensive plan and describes the financial means by which identified needed facilities are to be funded. The CIE also demonstrates the economic feasibility of the entire comprehensive plan and prioritizes the funding of all the public facilities identified in the county's comprehensive plan based on the level of need and the availability of funds. For purposes of this element, a capital improvement is a substantial facility (land, building, or major equipment) that costs at least $100,000 and which is required to maintain adopted level -of -service standards or to meet objectives identified in the county's comprehensive plan. Included in the CIE are an existing conditions section, an analysis section, a concurrency management section, a goals, objectives, and policies section, and an implementation section. While financial resources and existing local policies and practices are discussed in the existing conditions section, the fiscal condition of both the county and its comprehensive plan, as well as other issues concerning capital improvement projects, are assessed in the analysis section of this element. In the concurrency management section, the administrative framework for maintaining public facility service levels is addressed while the county's overall capital improvements strategy is discussed in the goals, objectives and policies section. Finally, a 5 -Year Schedule of Capital Improvements, as well as monitoring and evaluation programs, can be found in the implementation section of this element. 160 Existing Conditions Financial Resources One of the chief functions of the Capital Improvements Element is to inventory the major sources of revenue available to the county. Those revenue sources determine the county's capability to fund needed capital improvements. Table 6.1 lists the county's local, state, and federal revenue sources and indicates the amount of revenue collected from each source during FY 2017/18. Table 6.1 also shows the percentage distribution of total revenue received by Indian River County for each of the revenue sources. 161 Table 6.1: Indian River County Revenue Sources (FY 2017/18) Federal Sources State Sources Local Sources Amount % of Total Amount % of Total Amount % of Total ($1,000) Revenue ($1,000) Revenue ($1,000) Revenue Various Grants $9,724 3.57% Local Government Half -Cent Sales Tax $9,908 3.63% Ad Valorem Taxes $98,639 36.17% Total Federal $9,724 3.57% County Revenue Sharing $3,797 1.39% Enterprise Funds $56,327 20.65% Constitutional Fuel $1,853 0.68% User Fees and $17,133 6.28% Tax Charges $818 0.30% $546 0.20% County Fuel Tax Special Assessments $69 0.03% $7,245 2.66% Alcoholic Beverage License Tax Impact Fees Distribution of $447 0.16% $18,708 6.86% Sales and Use Local Discretionary Taxes to Counties Sales Surtax $106 0.04% $3,025 1.11% Mobile Home Tourist Development License Tax Tax $7,620 2.79% $3,830 1.40% Various Grants Local Option Fuel Tax Total State $24,618 9.03% Franchise Tax $9,443 3.46% $3,903 1.43% Interest Income $19,566 7.17% Other $238,370 .87.41% Total Local $272,712 100.00% otal All Sources FT 161 Local sources consist of revenues that are levied, collected and disbursed at the local level solely at the discretion of Indian River County. Those local sources are shown in table 6. 1, and are described in further detail below. • Ad Valorem Taxes (Property Taxes) Ad Valorem taxes are taxes levied on the assessed value (net of any exemptions) of real and personal property. This tax is commonly referred to as "property tax." Ad valorem taxes are generally assessed in mills; that is, thousandths of a dollar of assessed value. The state mandated millage cap is 10 mills per local government, excluding voted millages. In FY 2017/18, Indian River County imposed an aggregate millage rate of 5.9901. According to County policy, ad valorem taxes may be used for both operating and capital project expenditures. Table 6.1 shows that, in FY 2017/18, Indian River County collected approximately $98 639 in ad valorem taxes In FY FY Figure 6.1: Ad Valorem Tax Revenue by FY $120,000 $100,000 $9,7.939 $so,lsz $64,714 $80,000 $72,716 $76,634 $66,970 $60,000 i $40,000 i $20,000 i $0 12/13 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 ® Revenue (in thousands) Source: Indian River County Finance Department 2017/18, ad valorem taxes represented 36.17% of all revenues collected by Indian River County. Figure 6.1 displays the ad valorem tax revenue collected by Indian .River County over the last six fiscal years. As shown, ad valorem tax revenue has increased each year since FY 2012/13. The increase relates to a continually improving housing and property market. • Enterprise Funds Within governmental entities, there are often various departments that provide goods and services to the public in a manner similar to the private sector. Such departments, classed under the general title "enterprise funds;" must raise revenues from outside the government sector. Generally enterprise Figure 6.2: Enterprise Fund Reserve by FY $60,000- $501000- $40,000 60,000-$50,000-$40,000 $30,000 $20,000 $10,000 $o 12/13 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 B Revenue (in thousands) Source: Indian River County Finance Department departments assess a fee to the customer using the goods or services provided by that department. In 162 Table 6.1 shows that enterprise fund revenue represented 20.65% of Indian River County's total funds for FY 2017/18. Figure 6.2 displays the enterprise fund revenue collected by Indian River County over the last six fiscal years. During that time period, enterprise fund revenue increased 29.05%. • User Fees and Charges User fees and charges represent revenue received by the county for providing various general services. Those fees and charges are necessary because taxes alone cannot totally keep up with the increasing costs of services. This category includes fees collected by the Tax Collector's Office, the Clerk of the Circuit Court, the Property Appraiser's Office, the Sheriff's Department, and the Recreation and Parks Department. This category also includes other miscellaneous user fees charged by the county for general services not financed by other fund sources. In FY 2017/18, user fees and charges represented 6.28% of all funds collected by Indian River County. Figure 6.3: User Fees and Charges by FY $19,000 $18,558 $18,500 $18,077 $18,000 $17,500 $17,133 $17,000 $16,500 $16,007 $16,000 $,3,333 $15,500 $15,000 j $14,500 $14,000 12/13 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 ® Revenue (in thousands) Source: Indian River County Finance Department Figure 6.3 displays user fees and charges collected by Indian River County over the last six fiscal years.. During that time period, revenue from user fees and charges varied, but overall increased 7.27%. • -. Special Assessments Special assessments are compulsory payments levied on real property for specific benefits generated by public investments or services. By law, the assessment levied must fairly reflect the actual costs of the improvements. County revenues which fall under the general category of special assessments consist of street paving assessments, street lighting district assessments, as well as assessments for water, sewer, and drainage improvements. Figure 6.4: Special Assessments Revenue by FY $800 $700 $600 $536 $562 $546 $481 $505 $500 �. 7 $400 $300 i $200 $100 i $- 12/13 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 m Revenue (in thousands) Source: Indian River County Finance Department 163 Special Assessment revenue represented 0.20% of county funds for FY 2017/18. Figure 6.4 displays the revenue collected by Indian River County through special assessments over the last six fiscal years. During that time period, revenue from special assessments increased by 13.51 %. Impact Fees An impact fee is a one-time charge, fee, or assessment levied as a condition of subdivision or site plan approval, building permit issuance, or other development or construction approval when the revenues collected are intended to fund the costs of capital improvements for public facilities. Since 1986, Indian River County has levied traffic impact fees on new development projects. In June of 2005, Indian River County began to levy 8 new impact fees. At the same time, the County increased the existing traffic impact fee rates. The nine impact fees include: traffic, emergency services, parks and recreation, public schools, solid waste, correctional facilities, law enforcement, libraries, and public buildings. On March 3, 2009, the Board of County Commissioners considered several alternatives to reduce impact fees for the purpose of stimulating economic development in the county. After discussion, the Board decided to suspend collection of five of the county's nine impact fees for six months. The five suspended impact fees were: emergency services, correctional facilities, public buildings, law enforcement, and solid waste. On September 22, 2009 and again on March 16, 2010, the Board of County Commissioners voted to further extend the suspension of the five impact fees. At its March 16, 2010 vote, the Board of County Commissioners extended the suspension of the five impact fees to March 31, 2011. On March 15, 2011 and again on March 13, 2012, the Board of County Commissioners re-evaluated the impact fee suspension and ultimately voted to continue suspending three of the five previously suspended impact fees. Those three fees were: public buildings, correctional facilities, and solid waste facilities. The March 13, 2012 vote of the Board of County Commissioners suspended the three fees until March 31, 2014. On March 11, 2014 the Board of County Commissioners voted to suspend the same three impact fees until March 31, 2015 or until the County could complete its most recent impact fee review and adopt a new impact fee schedule. By early April 2014 the County had completed the nonresidential portion of its impact fee review and on April 22, 2014 the Board of County Commissioners adopted 164 Figure 6.5: Impact Fee Revenue by FY $8,000 -- $7,245 $7,000 $s,2s2 $6,000 $5,704 $5,281 $5,000 $a 218 $4,000 $3,215 $3,000 $2,000 $1,000 $- 12/ 13 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 ® Revenue (in thousands) Source: Indian River County Finance Department traffic, emergency services, parks and recreation, public schools, solid waste, correctional facilities, law enforcement, libraries, and public buildings. On March 3, 2009, the Board of County Commissioners considered several alternatives to reduce impact fees for the purpose of stimulating economic development in the county. After discussion, the Board decided to suspend collection of five of the county's nine impact fees for six months. The five suspended impact fees were: emergency services, correctional facilities, public buildings, law enforcement, and solid waste. On September 22, 2009 and again on March 16, 2010, the Board of County Commissioners voted to further extend the suspension of the five impact fees. At its March 16, 2010 vote, the Board of County Commissioners extended the suspension of the five impact fees to March 31, 2011. On March 15, 2011 and again on March 13, 2012, the Board of County Commissioners re-evaluated the impact fee suspension and ultimately voted to continue suspending three of the five previously suspended impact fees. Those three fees were: public buildings, correctional facilities, and solid waste facilities. The March 13, 2012 vote of the Board of County Commissioners suspended the three fees until March 31, 2014. On March 11, 2014 the Board of County Commissioners voted to suspend the same three impact fees until March 31, 2015 or until the County could complete its most recent impact fee review and adopt a new impact fee schedule. By early April 2014 the County had completed the nonresidential portion of its impact fee review and on April 22, 2014 the Board of County Commissioners adopted 164 a revised reduced nonresidential impact fee schedule with an effective date of May 5, 2014. The residential impact fee review was completed in September of 2014 and a revised residential impact fee schedule was adopted by the Board of County Commissioners on October 14, 2014 with an effective date of February 2, 2015. For both the nonresidential impact fee schedule and the residential impact fee schedule the Board of County Commissioners voted to not collect the correctional facilities, solid waste facilities, and libraries impact fees at this time. Figure 6.5 shows that more than seven million dollars of impact fee revenue was collected in FY 2017/18. This is nearly six and a half million dollars more than what was collected in FY 2010/11. Impact fee revenues decreased during the Great Recession, gradually increased through FY 2015/16 and slightly decreased in FY 2016/17. During the past six years revenue from impact fees have increased 125.35%. Local Discretionary Sales Surtax Pursuant to s. 212.055, F.S, local governments are authorized to levy numerous types of local discretionary sales surtaxes. Under the provisions of s. 212.054, F.S., the local discretionary sales surtaxes apply to all transactions subject to the state tax imposed on sales, use, services, rentals, admissions, and other authorized transactions. The surtax is computed by multiplying the rate imposed by the county where the sale occurs by the amount of the taxable sale. This sales tax can be levied on most transactions under $5,000. According to state law, Indian River County is eligible to impose a Local Figure 6.6: Local Discretionary Sales Surtax by FY $20,000 $18,708 $18,000 $16,000 $14,000 $12,000 $10,000 $8,000 $6,000 $4,000 $2,000 12/13 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 © Revenue (in thousands) Source: Indian River County Finance Department Government Infrastructure Surtax of either 0.5% or 1.0%. Currently, Indian River County imposes the 1.0% Infrastructure Surtax. Procedurally, the Local Government Infrastructure Surtax must be enacted by a majority vote of the Board of County Commissioners and approved by voters in a countywide referendum. That surtax, which may be imposed for a maximum period of fifteen years, was imposed by Indian River County in April, 1989, and was renewed by voters in November, 2002 and again in November 2016. Generally, the proceeds must be expended to finance, plan, and construct infrastructure; to acquire land for public recreation or conservation or protection of natural resources; or to finance the closure of local government-owned solid waste landfills that are already closed or are required to close by order of the Department of Environmental Protection. 165 Table 6.1 shows that local sales surtax revenue represented 6.86% of all funds collected by Indian River County in FY 2017/18. Figure 6.6 displays the Local Discretionary Sales Surtax revenue received by Indian River County over the last six fiscal years. This local revenue source increased by 36.47% over that period. Distribution of surtax proceeds is based on the specifics of an interlocal agreement or through a formula based on population. In Indian River County, Local Infrastructure Surtax revenue is distributed to county government and municipal governments through a formula based on population. Currently, twenty-five of the sixty-seven Florida counties levy a Local Government Infrastructure Surtax. Within Indian River County's region, Martin and St. Lucie counties do not levy the surtax. While Okeechobee County is eligible to levy the infrastructure surtax, it instead levies a Small County Surtax of 1%. That is another local discretionary sales surtax. Tourist Development Tax Any county in the state may, subject to a vote of the citizenry, impose a Tourist Development Tax. The transient rental trade is the primary base for the levy of the tourist tax. Any lodging agreement for six months or less is subject to the tax. Generally, the tourist tax levy is one or two percent. Counties, however, may set an additional one percent above the original tax through an extraordinary vote of the governing board or by referendum. Further, if a professional sports franchise facility is located within a county, an additional one to two percent tourist tax may also be levied. The first one percent professional sports franchise Figure 6.7: Tourist Development Tax Revenue by FY $3,500 $3,025 $3,000 $2,818 $2,500 $2,267 $2,433 $2,000 $1918 $, $1,500 $1,000 $500 12/13 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 ® Revenue (in thousands) Source: I nd ian River Cou my Finance Department facility tax may be authorized by a majority vote of the governing board of the county, while the second one percent tax must be authorized by a majority plus one vote of the governing board of the county. Currently, Indian River County imposes the original two percent tourist tax, the additional one percent tax, and an additional one percent professional sports franchise facility tax. Out of Florida's sixty-seven counties, sixty-three currently levy a tourist tax. Of those sixty-three counties, fifty-three counties, including Indian River County, impose an additional one percent tourist tax; forty-four counties, including Indian River County, impose a one percent professional sports franchise tax, and thirty counties impose the second one percent professional sports franchise tax. 166 Table 6.2 displays the tourist taxes imposed in counties that are geographically proximate to Indian River County. Compared to neighboring counties, Indian River County imposes a similar level of tourist taxes. Palm Beach County has the highest tourist tax levy of the six counties listed (6.0%), followed by Brevard, St. Lucie, and Martin Counties at 5.0%. While Indian River County has a tourist tax rate of 4.00%, Okeechobee County has the lowest tourist tax levy at 3.0%. Table 6.2: Optional Tourist Taxes on Transient Rental Facilities Original Professional Additional Maximum County Tourist Additional Sports Professional Potential % Total % Levy Tax Franchise Sports Tax Facility Tax Franchise Tax Le vy Brevard 2.00% 1.00% 1.00% 1.00% 5.00% 5.00% Indian River 2.00% 1.00% 1.00% ---------- 5.00% 4.00% Martin 2.00% 1.00% 1.00% 1.00% 5.00% 5.00% Okeechobee 2.00% 1.00% ---------- ---------- 5.00% 3.00% Palm Beach 2.00% 1.00% 1.00% 1.00% 6.00%* 6.00%* St. Lucie 2.00% 1.00% 1.00% 1.00% 5.00% 5.00% Note: Shading indicates those counties eligible to impose a particular tax *Palm Beach County is 1 out of 9 counties in the state that can also impose a 1% High Tourism Impact Tax, which it currently does levee. Source: The Florida Legislature's Office of Economic and Demographic Research website: November 2019 The Local Option Tourist Tax can be used for the following purposes: (1) Acquire, construct, extend, enlarge, remodel, repair, improve, maintain, operate, and promote one or more publicly owned and operated convention centers, such as sports stadiums, coliseums, or auditoriums within the district that the tax is imposed; (2) Acquire, construct, extend, enlarge, remodel, repair, improve, maintain, operate, and promote aquariums, or museums that are publicly owned and operated or owned and operated by a not-for-profit organization and open to the public, within the boundaries of the county or subcounty special taxing district in which the tax is levied; (3) Promote zoological parks that are publicly owned and operated or owned and operated by not-for-profit organizations and open to the public; Community Development Department Indian River County Adopted December , 2019, Ordinance 2019- $ 167 (4) Promote and advertise tourism nationally, internationally, and in the State of Florida; (5) Fund convention bureaus and other tourist information bureaus as county agencies or by h h 1-1-1- f C nt coract wrt . t e aer o ommerce or similar associations in the county; (6) Finance beach park facilities, or beach, channel, estuary, or lagoon improvement, maintenance, renourishment, restoration, and erosion control, including construction of beach groins and shoreline protection, enhancement, cleanup, or restoration or inland lakes and rivers to which there is public access as those uses relate to the physical preservation of the beach, shoreline, channel, estuary, lagoon, or inland lake or river; (7) Pledge the revenues to secure and liquidate revenue bonds issued by the county, subject to certain limitations. Figure 6.7 shows the Tourist Development Tax revenue received by Indian River County over the last six fiscal years. Since FY 2012/13, Tourist Development Tax revenue has increased73.55%. ➢ Local Option Fuel Tax Local governments are authorized to levy up to twelve cents of local option fuel taxes in the form of three separate levies. Those levies are: ➢ a one to six cent local option fuel tax; ➢ a one to five cent local option fuel tax; and ➢ a ninth cent fuel tax. Indian River County currently imposes the full six cents of the one to six cent fuel tax. That tax applies to every net gallon of motor and diesel fuel sold within the county. The one to six cent fuel tax may be authorized by an ordinance adopted by a majority vote of the governing body or voter approval in a county -wide referendum. Generally, the proceeds may be used to fund transportation expenditures. Table 6.1 shows that local option fuel tax revenue represented 1.40% of all funds collected by Indian River County for FY 2017/18. Figure 6.8 shows that, since FY 2012/13 there has been an upward trend with local option fuel tax revenue for the county. The increase in local option fuel tax revenue 168 Figure 6.8: Local Option Fuel Tax Revenue by FY $4,500 $4,000$3,830 $3,508 $3,574 $3,651 $3,500 $3,145 $3,133 $3,000 $2,500 $2,000 $1,500 $1,000 $500 $ 12/13 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 ® Revenue (in thousands) Source: Indian River County Finance Department Figure 6.7 shows the Tourist Development Tax revenue received by Indian River County over the last six fiscal years. Since FY 2012/13, Tourist Development Tax revenue has increased73.55%. ➢ Local Option Fuel Tax Local governments are authorized to levy up to twelve cents of local option fuel taxes in the form of three separate levies. Those levies are: ➢ a one to six cent local option fuel tax; ➢ a one to five cent local option fuel tax; and ➢ a ninth cent fuel tax. Indian River County currently imposes the full six cents of the one to six cent fuel tax. That tax applies to every net gallon of motor and diesel fuel sold within the county. The one to six cent fuel tax may be authorized by an ordinance adopted by a majority vote of the governing body or voter approval in a county -wide referendum. Generally, the proceeds may be used to fund transportation expenditures. Table 6.1 shows that local option fuel tax revenue represented 1.40% of all funds collected by Indian River County for FY 2017/18. Figure 6.8 shows that, since FY 2012/13 there has been an upward trend with local option fuel tax revenue for the county. The increase in local option fuel tax revenue 168 can be attributed to an improving economy and lower fuel prices which have led to an increase in fuel consumption. All sixty-seven Florida counties levy the full $0.06 of the original local option fuel tax. Table 6.3 identifies the local fuel taxes levied in Indian River County and in other counties in the region. As shown in Table 6.3, Saint Lucie, Martin, Okeechobee, and Palm Beach counties all levy the highest allowable fuel taxes at $0.12 per gallon. Those four counties impose both the Ninth Cent Fuel Tax and the One to Five Cent Local Option Fuel Tax. While Indian River County is eligible to levy the Ninth -Cent Fuel Tax and the One to Five Cent Local Option Fuel Tax either by extraordinary vote of the Board of County Commissioners or by voter approval in a countywide referendum, it does not currently levy either tax. At this time, fifty-three of the sixty-seven Florida counties levy the Ninth -Cent Fuel Tax, while thirty-four of the sixty-seven Florida counties impose at least a portion of the One to Five Cent Local Option Fuel Tax. Table 6.3: Local Fuel Tax Rates County One to Six Cent Local Option Fuel Tax One to Five Cent Local Option Fuel Tax Ninth Cent Fuel Tax Total Local Fuel Tax Brevard $0.06 -------- -------- $0.06 Indian River $0.06 -------- -------- $0.06 Martin $0.06 $0.05 $0.01 $0.12 Okeechobee $0.06 $0.05 $0.01 $0.12 Palm Beach $0.06 $0.05 $0.01 $0.12 St. Lucie $0.06 $0.05 $0.01 $0.12 Source: The Florida Legislature's Office of Economic and Demographic Research website: November 2019. Franchise Fee/Tax Counties and municipalities may exercise their home rule authority to impose a fee upon a utility for the grant of a franchise and the privilege of the utility using the local government's rights-of-way to conduct the utility's business. Franchise fees are typically levied through a franchise agreement negotiated between the local government and the utility provider. Indian River County receives franchise revenue from electric, water, sewer, garbage, and cable television franchises. Table 6.1 shows that franchise fee revenue represented 3.46% of all funds collected by Indian River County in FY 2017/18. Figure 6.9 shows that since FY 2012/13 franchise fee revenue collected by Indian River County increased 7.13%. 169 Other Miscellaneous Revenue Included in this category are various administrative fees, licenses and permits, fines, interest income, rental income, private contributions, and other miscellaneous revenues. This source of revenue for Indian River County represented 7.17% of all funds collected in FY 2017/18. Borrowing As needed, the county uses borrowing as a financing vehicle to raise money for public purposes that are beyond the realm of current cash reserves, operating revenue and reasonable taxation. Currently, borrowing money to pay for 1 b d Figure 6.9: Franchise Fee/Tax Revenue by FY $9,500 r$9,448 $9,400 $9,300 $9,200 $9,100 $9,000 $8,900 $8,800 $8,700 $8,x00 $8,500 �� mill 12/13 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 ® Revenue (in thousands) Source: Indian River County Finance Department capita improvements can e one through either short-term or long-term financing. Short term financing is usually accomplished by the use of bond pools, notes, private placements with banks, and the public placement of Voted General Obligation debt. Long term financing is usually achieved through the issuance of bonds sold on the public market. According to state law, local governments may sell bonds for capital improvements without a referendum of the voters if the pledge used for the bond is a non -ad valorem revenue source. Conversely, any bond issue pledging ad valorem taxes requires approval through a voter referendum. General Obligation Bonds are bonds that are secured by the full faith and credit of the issuing government. Those bonds are secured by a pledge of the issuer's ad valorem taxing power. According to state law, the amount of ad valorem taxes necessary to pay the debt service on general obligation bonds is not subject to the constitutional property tax millage limits. Such bonds constitute debts of the issuer and require approval through a voter referendum prior to issuance. Revenue bonds are bonds payable from a specific source of revenue, where the full faith and credit of the issuer is not pledged to repay the bonds. Because revenue bonds are payable from identified sources of revenue, bond holders may not compel taxation or legislative appropriation of funds for payment of debt service. Pledged revenues may be derived from operation of financed projects, grants, or other specified non -ad valorem taxes. A public referendum is not required prior to issuance or validation of such obligations. In the past, the county has issued revenue bonds to finance improvements to its sanitary sewer, potable water, and golf course facilities. Also, revenue bonds have been issued to finance the cost of construction of various capital improvement projects. 170 Deposits from bond revenues are put into the respective bond fund accounts for those projects, whereby funds are specifically designated for a particular project, and user charges are used to pay off the debt. Special assessment bonds are bonds issued to pay for capital improvements that impact specific areas or groups of property owners. Proceeds from the assessments levied against benefiting property owners are used to pay off the bond debt. The issuance of those bonds does not need to be approved by voter referendum. Revenue bonds and special assessment bonds are similar in nature, except that special assessment bond debt is paid -off by assessments levied against benefiting property owners and not from ongoing user charges. The county has issued special assessment bonds for solid waste disposal. The issuance of tax anticipation or bond anticipation notes is an example of a short-term (less than five years) method of financing. Notes usually have higher interest rates than bonds and have shorter maturity dates than bonds. Tax anticipation notes are issued in advance of a new fiscal year to cover gaps in the budget before property taxes are received, while bond anticipation notes are issued in anticipation of the receipt by the county of proceeds from the sale of corresponding future bond issues. The county currently has no outstanding tax or bond anticipation notes. Additional Optional Local Revenue Sources Occasionally, the use of additional revenue sources may be necessary, depending on priorities mandated by the Board of County Commissioners and the availability of existing revenue sources. In such cases, Indian River County has two options to increase local revenues. One is to implement new taxes that are permitted by state regulation, while the other is to increase existing taxes and fees that are imposed by the county. Additional local revenue sources available to Indian River County include the Ninth Cent Fuel Tax, the One to Five Cent Local Option Fuel Tax, and the Professional Sports Franchise Facility Tax. Both the Ninth Cent Fuel Tax and the One to Five Cent Local Option Fuel Tax are taxes on the purchase of fuel. With the Ninth Cent Fuel Tax, a one cent per gallon tax on motor fuel and special fuel can be levied on fuel purchases in the county. Revenue from the Ninth Cent Fuel Tax may be shared with municipalities, but counties are not required by law to share the proceeds. Authorized uses for revenue collected from the Ninth Cent Fuel Tax include paying the costs and expenses of establishing, operating, and maintaining a transportation system and related facilities. Additional uses include funding the acquisition, construction, reconstruction, and maintenance of roads. The One to Five Cent Local Option Fuel Tax is a one to five cents tax that can be levied upon every gallon of motor fuel sold in Indian River County. Revenues from that fuel tax must be shared among all eligible jurisdictions in the county as a result of an interlocal agreement or by an historical transportation expenditures formula. Authorized uses for revenue collected from the 171 One to Five Cent Fuel Tax include transportation expenditures needed to meet the requirements of the Capital Improvements Element of the Comprehensive Plan. A Professional Sports Franchise Facility Tax is a levy of up to 1% on any lodging agreement for six months or less. Revenue from this tax may be used to pay the debt service on bonds issued to finance the construction, reconstruction, or renovation of a professional sports franchise facility. State Sources Revenue classified as state sources may be generated locally but collected by the state and returned to the county. Table 6.1 displays the state revenue sources applicable to Indian River County. Those sources are described in further detail below. Local Government Half - Cent Sales Tax Figure 6.10: Half Cent Sales Tax Revenue $12,000 by FY $10,000 $8 885 $9,044 $9,432 $9,908 $7,829 $8,220 $8,000 I $6,000 r TT $4,000 $2,000 $- 12/13 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 IM Reven ue (in thousands) Source: Indian River Cou nty Finance Department The Local Government Half Cent Sales Tax Program allocates 8.9744% of net sales tax proceeds remitted by sales tax dealers in a county to a special account administered by the Department of Revenue; that account is the Local Government Half Cent Sales Tax Clearing Trust Fund. Those funds are then earmarked for distribution to the governing body of the county and each municipality within the county. Distribution of those monies within the county is determined by a formula that uses a weighting factor based on the population of the incorporated and unincorporated areas and multiplies that factor by 8.9744% of the sales tax proceeds received by the county. In FY 2017/18, Indian River County received $9,908,000 through the half -cent sales tax. As shown in Table 6. 1, that amount represented 3.63% of all funds collected by Indian River County during the 2017/2018 fiscal year. Figure 6.10 displays the funds made available to Indian River County through the half -cent local government sales tax over the last six fiscal years. Overall, Indian River County's half -cent sales tax revenue increased between Fiscal Year 2012/13 and Fiscal Year 2017/18. Occasionally, governments can receive supplemental distributions by meeting special eligibility criteria; however, in no case can the total supplemental and ordinary distribution exceed the maximum per capita amount allowed by law. Governments are allowed wide latitude in using the half cent sales tax. For counties, the law provides only that half cent sales tax revenue be used for countywide tax relief or countywide programs. 172 • County Revenue Sharing The current structure of the county revenue sharing program consists of two revenue sources. Those sources include 2.90% of net cigarette tax collections and 2.0810% of sales and use tax collections. Proceeds are collected by the state and then distributed to eligible counties based on an allocation formula. There are no use restrictions on the distributed revenue; however, there are some statutory limitations regarding those funds being used as a pledge for indebtedness. To receive distribution proceeds through the county revenue sharing program, counties must meet the following criteria: Figure 6.11: County Revenue Sharing by FY $4,000 $3,797 $3,601 $3,797 $3,500 $3,333 $2,894 $3,082 $3,000 $2,500 $2,000 $1,500 P$1,000 $500 12/13 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 ® Revenue (in thousands) Source: Indian River County Finance Deparment (1) Law enforcement officers and firefighters are certified and meet state requirements; (2) Certification of taxable value for a property tax levy is made in a timely and correct manner to the Department of Revenue; (3) The county's most recent financial reports must have been sent to the Department of Financial Services, and post audits of those statements and accounts must have been provided. Table 6.1 shows that county revenue sharing funds represented 1.39% of all funds collected by Indian River County in FY 2017/18. Figure 6.11 shows that, between Fiscal Year 2012/13 and 2017/18, Indian River County's revenue sharing gradually increased. FIGURE 6.12: Constitutional Fuel Tax Revenue by FY $1,900 $1,850 $1,800 $1,750 $1,700 $1,650 $1,600 $1,550 $1,500 $1,450 $1,400 12113 13114 14/15 1516 16/17 17/18 11 Revenue (in thousands) Source: Indian River County Finance Department 173 • Constitutional Fuel Tax The constitutional fuel tax is defined as an excise or license tax of two cents per gallon of motor fuel, dih f 1 f 1 mpose upon t e first sa e or first remova from storage (after importation into Florida). Revenues from this levy become state funds at the time of collection by the refiner, importer or wholesaler. In its current form, the constitutional fuel tax is a state -shared revenue source for counties only. Applying a distribution formula, the state allocates proceeds to counties to the extent necessary to comply with all obligations to or for the benefit of holders of bonds, revenue certificates, and tax anticipation certificates or any refunds secured by any portion of the tax proceeds. After complying with the necessary debt service obligations, the state distributes a county's surplus funds to its governing body. Figure 6.13: County Fuel Tax by FY $840 $820 $800 $780 $760 $740 $720 $700 $680 $660 $640 $620 .Elm -T 12/13 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 ® Reven ue (in thousands) Source: Indian RiverCou my Finance Department Table 6.1 shows that revenue received from the constitutional fuel tax levy represented 0.68% of total revenue received by Indian River County in FY 2017/18. Figure 6.12 shows that, over the last six fiscal years, constitutional fuel tax revenue received by Indian River County increased by 15.11 %. • County Fuel Tax The county fuel tax is levied on motor fuel at the rate of one cent per net gallon. The legislative intent of this tax is to reduce a county's reliance on ad valorem taxes. Funds received from this tax can be used by a county for transportation -related expenses, including the reduction of bond indebtedness incurred for transportation purposes. Table 6. l ,shows that funds received through the county fuel tax levy represented 0.30% of all revenue collected by Indian River County in FY 2017/18. Figure 6.13 shows that, over the last six fiscal years, county fuel tax revenue received by Indian River County increased 17.19%. Figure 6.14: Alcoholic Beverage License Tax by FY $80 $70 $ss $ss —$61 $61 $59 $60 $57 $50 $40 $30 $20 $10 12/13 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 ® Revenue (in thousands) Source: Indian River County Finance Department 174 Alcoholic Beverage License Tax Alcoholic beverage license taxes are levied on manufacturers, distributors, vendors, and sales agencies of alcoholic beverages in Florida. The tax is administered, collected, enforced, and distributed to local governments by the Division of Alcoholic Beverages and Tobacco within the Department of Business and Professional Regulation. Twenty-four percent of the license taxes imposed on the sale of beer, wine and liquor collected within a county is returned to the county Tax Collector. The remaining funds are used to operate the division and contribute to the operation of the Office of the Secretary of Business Regulation. Table 6.1 shows that the county received approximately $69,000 from this tax in FY 2017/18, 0.03% of all revenue received by Indian River County. Figure 6.14 shows that, over the last six fiscal years, alcoholic beverage license tax revenue received by Indian River County fluctuated. Distribution of Sales and Use Taxes to Counties According to Florida Statutes, a guaranteed entitlement of $29,915,500 is equally distributed among Florida's sixty-seven counties, providing each county's general revenue fund with $446,500. Table 6.1 shows that revenue received from the Distribution of Sales and Use Taxes represented 0.16% of revenues received by Indian River County in FY the Board of County Commissioners. Mobile Home License Tax An annual license tax is levied on all mobile homes and park trailers, and on all travel trailers and fifth -wheel trailers exceeding thirty-five feet in body length. The license taxes, ranging from $20 to $80 depending on body length, are collected in lieu of ad valorem taxes. The taxes are collected by county tax collectors and remitted to the Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles. From each license, two deductions are made. The first is a deduction of $1.50 by the Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles, with proceeds deposited into the State General 2017/18. Uses for this revenue are determined by Figure 6.15: Mobile Home License Tax Reven FY $114 $113 $112 $110 $110 $108 $108 $107 $1os $106 $104 $103 $102 j $100 $9s 12/13 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 ® Revenue (in thousands) Source: I nd ian River Cou my Finance Department Revenue Fund. The second is a deduction of $1.00, with proceeds deposited into the Florida Mobile Home Relocation Trust Fund. The remaining balance is deposited into the License Tax Collection Trust Fund for distribution to units of local government. A county government is eligible to receive proceeds from this tax if taxable mobile home units are located in its unincorporated area. An authorized use of the proceeds is not specified in the current law. 175 Table 6.1 shows that funds received through the mobile home license tax represented0.04% of all revenue received by Indian River County in FY 2017/18. Figure 6.15 shows that, mobile home license tax revenue received by Indian River County fluctuated between FY 2012/13 and FY 2017/18. Various Grants Table 6.1 shows that funds received in the form of state grants represented 2.79% of funds received by the county in FY 2017/18. Those state grant funds received by the county originated from the Division of Emergency Management, the Florida Housing Finance Corporation, the Florida Department of State, the Florida Department of Environmental Protection, the Florida Department of Transportation, the Florida Department of Revenue, the Florida Department of Law Enforcement, the Florida Department of Economic Opportunity, and the Florida Department of Health. Federal Sources Federal funds are either granted directly to local governments or passed through state agencies for administration and monitoring. Those grants are usually distributed on a competitive basis rather than by formula allocations, thereby making forecasts of future revenues difficult. For the purpose of revenue forecasts, those sources will be assumed to remain constant. During FY 2017/18 the county received approximately $9,724,000 in federal funds. Those funds represented 3.57% of all funds received by Indian River County in FY 2017/18. Overall Revenue Sources As mandated by state statute, the financial resources of the county are categorized according to the state Chart of Accounts. The categories in the state Chart of Accounts are taxes, licenses and permits, intergovernmental revenue, charges for services, fines and forfeitures, and miscellaneous revenues. Table 6.4 identifies the total amount of historic revenue generated from those sources for fiscal years 2012/13 through 2017/18. Table 6.4: Indian River County General Revenues By Source Fiscal Year Licenses & Intergovernmental Charges for Fines & Miscellaneous Totals Taxes Pen -nits Revenue Services Forfeitures Revenues 2012/2013 $88005,422 $12,769,844 $30,800,036 $59,536,566 $778,575 $4,934,481 $196,824,924 2013/2014 $94,585,345 $14,321,389 $30,873,889 $63,414,219 $1,004,374 $4,141,341 $208,340,557 2014/2015 $100,182,672 $18,471,625 $33,624,651 $62,987,961 $924,860 $4,548,434 $220,740,203 2015/2016 $109,101,602 $19,872,044 $33,535,027 $62 868 855 $1,708,273 $10,591,490 $237 677 291 2016/2017 $115,774,419 $19,558,052 $31,587,431 $64,685,312 $1,680,464 $9,058,093 $242,343,771 2017/2018 $125,723,036 $22,425,960 $37,168,177 $67,769,381 $1,739,585 $17,885,999 $272,712,138 Source: Indian River County Comprehensive Annual Financial Report, 2017/18 & Indian River County Finance Department. Community Development Department Indian River County Adopted December , 2019, Ordinance 2019-_ 17 176 Figure 6.16 displays the distribution of revenue by the same categories listed in table 6.4 for each of the last six fiscal years. Figure 6.16: Distribution of General Revenues By Category 2013 0 44.71% . ° 15.65% 2.51% 30.25% 0.40% 45.90% 8.36% 14.11% 4.46% 26.45% 0.72% ® Taxes © Charges for services Expenditures 2014 45.40% 6.87% �- - 14.82% 99% n 4Ro/ 30.44% 2017 47.77% 8.07% 13.03% 74%— 26.69% 0.69% B Licenses & Permits ■ Fines & Forfeitures 2015 45.38 0 _ 8.37% 15.23% 2.06% 0.42% 28.53% 12.2% 2018 ,1— 37.0% 0 ��I I .70 2.6% 6.0% 12.5% 3.71 0 Intergovernmental Revenue B Miscellaneous Revenues In the previous sub -section, the various revenue and income sources currently utilized by Indian River County were reviewed. This sub -section of the Capital Improvements Element identifies how those monies are allocated to meet the County's needs. Table 6.5 presents the County's overall general expenditures by category for fiscal years 2012/13 through 2017/18. Table 6.5: Indian River County General Government Expenditures By Function and by FY Fiscal Year 2012/13 2013/14 2014/15 5/6 2016/17 2017/18 General Government $21,965,255 $21,517,147 $23,569,495 02,3 !$4;9114881487105 $29,456,693 $30,631,940 Public Safety $66,908,328 $70,368,651 $74,492,323 $81,251,970 $89,841,802 $92,695,363 Physical Environment $46,668,122 $49,893,042 $48,474,272 $55 578 221 $59,317,463 Transportation $37,687,588 $34,859,058 $29,812,672 $30,991,899 $29,314,242 $31,359,379 Economic Environment $2 581 401 $1,106,886 $436,320 $424,593 $437,031 $426,085 Human Services $6,952,460 460 $7178542 $7,519,756 $7.868.392 $8.116.910 $9,302,125 Community Development Department Indian River County Adopted December , 2019, Ordinance 2019-_ 18 177 Source: Indian River County Comprehensive Annual Financial Report 2017/18. Table 6.5 shows expenditures in nine categories. Depending on the county's activities in any given fiscal year, the level of expenditures may fluctuate for certain categories. Figure 6.17 displays the percentage distribution of Indian River County's general expenditures over the last six fiscal years. Figure 6.17: General Government Expenditures by Function 2013 31.6% 10.4% 22.1% a, 3.9% 17.8% 2.9% 6.9% 3.286 1.2% 2016 35.5% 10.1% 21.50i 2.3%0-- .3% 13.5% 2.9% 10.6% 3.4390%/. 0.2% o General Government ® Transportation ® Culture/Recreation General Government 33.1% 2014 10.1% 23.5% 2.7% i 16.4% 3.10% 7.2% 3.38 °/11 _.. * Public Safety ■ Economic Environment IM Court Related 2015 34.4% 10.9% 22.4% 2.5% 13.8% 3.1 % 9.2% 3.477 6 0.2% 2.2% 2.1% 2.6 ❑ Physical Environment ❑ Human Services * Debt Service 37.0% JOW 23.7% 12.5% A major classification of services provided by Indian River County, the general government expenditure category, consists of activities undertaken by the legislative and administrative branches of the county government. Departments such as the Board of County Commissioners, County Administrator, Personnel, and Purchasing fall into this category, as do all Constitutional Officers, Community Development Department Indian River County Adopted December , 2019, Ordinance 2019-_ 19 178 Fiscal Year 2012/13 2013/14 2014/15 2016/17 2017/18 Culture/Recreation $14,613,121 $15,178,817 $19 857 345 $15891840 $14980 225 Court Related $6054,822 $6 487 906 $6 677 909 a247 $6 755 050Debt Service $8168 704 $5684616 $5446 070 $5,230,520 $5,270,153 TOTAL $211,599,801 $212,274,665 $216,286,162 $228,775,010 $240,622,309 $250.522.778 Source: Indian River County Comprehensive Annual Financial Report 2017/18. Table 6.5 shows expenditures in nine categories. Depending on the county's activities in any given fiscal year, the level of expenditures may fluctuate for certain categories. Figure 6.17 displays the percentage distribution of Indian River County's general expenditures over the last six fiscal years. Figure 6.17: General Government Expenditures by Function 2013 31.6% 10.4% 22.1% a, 3.9% 17.8% 2.9% 6.9% 3.286 1.2% 2016 35.5% 10.1% 21.50i 2.3%0-- .3% 13.5% 2.9% 10.6% 3.4390%/. 0.2% o General Government ® Transportation ® Culture/Recreation General Government 33.1% 2014 10.1% 23.5% 2.7% i 16.4% 3.10% 7.2% 3.38 °/11 _.. * Public Safety ■ Economic Environment IM Court Related 2015 34.4% 10.9% 22.4% 2.5% 13.8% 3.1 % 9.2% 3.477 6 0.2% 2.2% 2.1% 2.6 ❑ Physical Environment ❑ Human Services * Debt Service 37.0% JOW 23.7% 12.5% A major classification of services provided by Indian River County, the general government expenditure category, consists of activities undertaken by the legislative and administrative branches of the county government. Departments such as the Board of County Commissioners, County Administrator, Personnel, and Purchasing fall into this category, as do all Constitutional Officers, Community Development Department Indian River County Adopted December , 2019, Ordinance 2019-_ 19 178 except the Sheriff. As shown in table 6.5, $30,631,940 was spent on general government services in FY 2017/.18. Between fiscal years 2012/13 and 2017/18, general government expenditures increased by 39.46%. In FY 2017/18, general government services represented 12.23% of all county expenses. Public Safety The Sheriff s Department, Fire Services, Advanced Life Support, Emergency Management, and the Medical Examiner fall under the category of Public Safety. As shown in table 6.5, the county, in FY 2017/18, spent $92,695,363 for public safety services. Since FY 2012/13, public safety expenditures have increased by 38.54%. Public safety represented 37.0% of all county expenses in FY 2016/17. Physical Environment The physical environment classification encompasses the county's water and waste water utilities, the Solid Waste Disposal District (SWDD), the Soil and Water Conservation District, and the Environmentally Sensitive Land Acquisition Fund. Table 6.5 shows that $59,317,463 was spent on these activities in FY 2017/18. Since FY 2012/13, physical environment expenditures have increased by 27.10%. Physical environment services represented 23.68% of all county expenses in FY 2017/18. Transportation Departments under the transportation category include Road and Bridge, County Engineering, Secondary Roads Construction, and Traffic Engineering. Those departments are responsible for designing, constructing, overseeing, and maintaining the county's roads and drainage systems. As shown in table 6.5, the county spent $31,359,379 on transportation facilities in FY 2017/18. Since FY 2012/13, transportation expenditures have decreased by 16.79%. Transportation expenses represented 12.52% of all county expenses in FY 2017/18. Economic Environment Included in the economic environment category are the costs of providing services which develop and improve the economic condition of the community and its citizens. Up to June 30, 2011, Veteran Services, the Housing Authority, and the Economic Development Division of the Indian River County Chamber of Commerce primarily undertook that function. On July 1, 2011, the Housing Authority was officially separated from the County; consequently, its expenditures are no longer reported here. Table 6.5 shows that $426,085 was spent on economic environment services in FY 2017/18. Since FY 2012/13, economic environment expenditures have decreased by 83.49%. Economic environment expenses represented 0.17% of all county expenses in FY2017/18. Higher expenses between FY 2011/12 and FY 2013/14 were the result of expenditure of Neighborhood Stabilization Program Community Development Block Grant funds, one time grants provided to lessen the negative effects of the economic downturn/recession and housing collapse. 179 Human Services Human Services cover the cost of providing services for the care, treatment, and control of human illness, injury or disabilities, and for the welfare of the community as a whole and its individuals. The Health Department, Welfare, Medicaid, and Children's Services fall into this category. Table 6.5 shows that the County spent $9,302,125 on human services in FY 2017/18. Since FY 2012/13, human services expenditures have increased by 33.80. Human Services represented 3.71% of all county expenses in FY 2017/18. Culture/Recreation All costs associated with providing and maintaining cultural and recreational facilities and activities for the benefit of citizens and visitors fit into this category. County libraries, parks, recreation operations, and the golf course are included here. As shown in table 6.5, the County spent $14,980,225 on those services in FY 2017/18. Since FY 2012/13, cultural/recreation expenditures have increased by 2.51 %. Culture/recreation expenses represented 5.98% of all County expenses in FY 2017/18. Court Related All costs of operating the judicial branch of Indian River County Government are classified here. That category includes the County Court, Circuit Court, State Attorney's Office and Public Defender. As shown in table 6.5, expenditures from that category totaled $6,540,045 in FY 2017/18. Between fiscal years 2016/17 and 2017/18, Court Related expenditures increased by 8.01%. Court Related costs represented 2.61% of all county expenses in FY 2017/18. Debt Service Debt service consists of interest and payments made by the county on its debt. That figure includes principal retirement, interest and other miscellaneous debt service. As table 6.5 indicates, total County debt service expenditures were $5,270,153 in FY 2017/18. Since FY 2012/13, debt service expenditures have decreased by 35.48%. Debt service expenses represented 2.10% of all County expenses in FY 2017/18. Existing Outstanding Debt At the end of FY 2019/20, Indian River County's outstanding debt, comprised of revenue bonds and general obligation bonds, stood at $14,597,000. That is shown in table 6.6. Currently, Enterprise Funds comprise 21.74% of the overall debt (Utility Dept), leaving $11,423,000 in bonds paid from general governmental funds. In November 2001, Indian River County issued the remaining $11,000,000 of the $26,000,000 Environmentally Sensitive Land Acquisition general obligation 180 bonds originally approved by voters in 1992. Also in 2001, the County issued $16,810,000 in Spring Training Facility Bonds to finance the acquisition and expansion of the Dodgertown spring training facility (now known as Historic Dodgertown). In 2004, Indian River County voters approved the issuance of up to an additional $50,000,000 in Environmentally Sensitive Land Acquisition general obligation bonds. As a result, Indian River County issued $48,600,000 in Environmentally Sensitive Land Acquisition general obligation bonds in 2006. While the county refinanced its 1996 Series Water and Sewer Bonds in 2005 and the majority of its 1993 Series A Water and Sewer Bonds in 2009, the County retained a portion of the 1993 Series A Water and Sewer Bonds with a maturity of 2011 because it was more cost efficient than rolling the entire amount into the 2009 Water and Sewer Bonds. That portion of the water and sewer bond has since been paid off. More recently, in 2015 the 2005 Series Water and Sewer Revenue Bonds and the 2006 Series Environmental Lands Acquisition Bonds were refinanced. Those bonds were refinanced to take advantage of better interest rates. In addition, the debt issuance for the 2009 series Water and Sewer Bonds were paid off and the Spring Training Facility bonds were partially paid off during fiscal year 2018/19. This has substantially decreased the County's total bond debt. Table 6.6: Indian River County Existing Long Term Debt Initial Amount Average Final Amount Remaining Interest Maturity Bond Rating Security Pledge rr,09/30/2018 Rate Water & Sewer Revenue Bonds: 2015 Series $7,171,000 3,174,000 1.65% 2022 N/A Water & Sewer Revenues Recreation Revenue Bonds 2001 Series Spring$16 810000 4,155,000 o 487/0 2031 AAA/FGIC State Funds &Tourist Tax Training Facility ,,. (Insured) Voted G.O. Bonds Environmental Lands Acquisition $20,369,000 7,268,000 1.66% 2021 N/A General Obligation 2015 Series Total Bonds $14,597,000 Outstanding Source: Indian River County Budget 2019/20. Local Policies and Practices As part of the capital improvements planning process, it is important to do an inventory of current Indian River County policies and practices that guide the timing, location, expansion, or increase in Community Development Department Indian River County Adopted December , 2019, Ordinance 2019-_ 22 181 capacity of capital facilities. Those policies and practices relate to the county's existing level -of - service standards, impact fee programs, comprehensive plan, and enterprise fund accounts. Existing Level -of -Service Standards Level -of -service (LOS) standards are indicators of the extent or degree of service provided by, or proposed to be provided by, a facility based on and related to the operational characteristics of the facility. Level -of -service standards indicate the capacity per unit of demand of each public facility. Level -of -service standards can affect the timing and location of development by guiding development to areas where facilities may have excess capacity. Indian River County has level -of -service standards for capital facilities as follows: ➢ Correctional Facilities (Countywide) • 4.5 beds per 1,000 permanent plus weighted peak seasonal population ➢ Fire/EMS (Countywide, excluding Indian River Shores) • .089 Stations per 1,000 permanent plus weighted peak seasonal population ➢ Law Enforcement (Unincorporated County) • 2.09 officers per 1,000 permanent plus weighted peak seasonal population ➢ Libraries (Countywide) • 580 building square feet per 1,000 permanent plus weighted peak seasonal population • 3,200 library material items per 1,000 permanent plus weighted peak seasonal population • 0.7 computers per 1,000 permanent plus weighted peak seasonal population • 0.2 other library equipment items per 1,000 permanent plus weighted peak seasonal population ➢ Potable Water (County Service Area) • 250 gallons per day per equivalent residential unit ➢ Public Buildings (Countywide) • 1.99 building square feet per capita for permanent plus weighted peak seasonal population ➢ Parks/Recreation (Unincorporated County) • 6.61 acres per 1,000 permanent plus weighted peak seasonal population ➢ Sanitary Sewer (County Service Area) • 250 gallons per day per equivalent residential unit 182 ➢ Schools (School Service Area): • 100 percent of Florida Inventory of School Houses (FISH) capacity for each public school type (elementary, middle, and high). ➢ Solid Waste (Countywide) • 2.2 tons per capita per year or 3.67 cubic yards per capita for permanent plus weighted peak seasonal population per year ➢ Stormwater Management • New drainage systems shall mitigate the impacts of a 25 year/24 hour design rainfall event • Minimum road crown elevation for existing roads shall be raised during resurfacing/rebuilding to the flood elevation resulting from the 2 year/24 hour storm event on local roads • The center two lanes of rebuilt roads must be at or above flood levels resulting from a 10 year/24 hour storm event on Arterial and Collector roads • All drainage basins will meet the following level -of -service standards: - • By 2000 - 2 year/24 hour storm event By 2005 - 5 year/24 hour storm event By 2010 - 10 year/24 hour storm event ➢ Transportation (Roadways) • Level -of -Service "D" during peak hour, peak season, and peak direction conditions on all TRIP grant funded roads as well as all freeway, arterial, and collector roadways, with the exception of the following two, which will operate at level of service "E" plus 20%: • 27th Ave — South County Line to SR 60 • 43rd Ave - Oslo Road to 16th Street For SIS/Florida Intrastate Highway System roadways, level of service `B" is adopted for rural areas, and level of service "C" is adopted for urban areas. ➢ Transit One-hour headways shall be maintained on all fixed transit routes Level -of -service standards are discussed in further detail in individual Comprehensive Plan Elements. Asset-based level of service standards for impact fee calculation purposes are provided in the Impact Fee Ordinance (Title X). Capital Improvements Program A capital improvements program (CIP) is a list of capital expenditures to be incurred each year over a fixed period of years to meet anticipated capital needs. In Indian River County, the CIP identifies the projects that the County plans to undertake in the next five years and presents an estimate of the costs and the resources needed to finance the projects. Revenue sources within the first year of the CIP 183 reflect current fund balances as well as anticipated annual revenue collection. Within the first three years of the CIP, projects are funded entirely with "committed" revenue sources. "Committed" revenue sources are revenue sources that currently exist. Projects in years four and five of the CII' may be funded partially through "planned" revenue sources. "Planned" revenue sources are sources available to the County that have not been utilized. The Capital Improvements Element (CIE) itself consolidates the capital improvements needs of all elements of the Comprehensive Plan into an overall five-year Capital Improvements Schedule. The overall program lists the needs, costs, timeframes, priorities, and the necessary financial resources to implement the identified capital improvement projects in the various elements of the plan in the next five years. Impact Fees/Capacity Charges Impact fees are charges to developers for off-site improvements that must be provided by the local government to serve new development. That financing technique is one strategy that the County uses to implement the CIE. Currently, the County has nine impact fees in place; those are traffic impact fees, which became effective in 1986, and eight additional impact fees which became effective in June of 2005. Those eight impact fees are assessed for the following service delivery categories: solid waste, public schools, fire/ems, parks and recreation, correctional facilities, law enforcement, libraries, and public buildings. In 2009, the Board of County Commissioners (BCC) voted to suspend five of the nine impact fees for a period of six months. Their intent in doing so was to help encourage development during the economic recession. Since then, the BCC has voted several times to maintain the suspension of at least three of the impact fees. Most recently, the Board of County Commissioners completed a review of all impact fees, and on April 22, 2014 adopted a revised reduced nonresidential impact fee schedule with an effective date of May 5, 2014 and adopted a revised residential impact fee schedule on October 14, 2014 with an effective date of February 2, 2015. For the new impact fee schedule, the Board of County Commissioners voted to not collect the correctional facilities, solid waste facilities, and libraries impact fees at this time. In October 1999, the county's water and sewer impact fees were reclassified as capacity charges. A capacity charge is a fee charged to the direct beneficiaries of water and sewer improvements in order to fund the capital cost incurred by the water and wastewater utility to provide capacity to serve new utility customers. Enterprise Funds Enterprise funds are used to account for operations financed and operated in a manner similar to private businesses, when the intent of the governing body is that the full costs of providing the service to the general public on a continuing basis be financed or recovered primarily through user charges. Currently, the County operates its solid waste services, golf course facility, building division services, and utility services as enterprise funds. 184 As a tool for affecting the timing and location of development, user charges may be designated to vary with the quantity and location of the service provided. Thus, charges could be greater for providing services further from urban areas and less for distances closer to urban areas. In this way, user charges could affect the economics of development locating further away from urban areas. Analysis The analysis section of this element assesses the County's historic and projected revenue and expenditure patterns to determine the County's fiscal ability to provide adequate capital improvements. Those capital improvements have been identified in other comprehensive plan elements and are needed to meet the demands of existing and future development. As part of this analysis, revenue and expenditure projections are identified and analyzed, and a fiscal assessment of needs (costs) versus projected available revenue is included. Analysis of the Timing and Location of Capital Improvements Objectives and policies from the Future Land Use Element, Potable Water Sub -Element, Sanitary Sewer Sub -Element, Recreation and Open Space Element, Public School Facilities Element, and the Transportation Element, as well as policies followed by the Sheriff's office and County departments such as Emergency Management, Corrections, Libraries, and Solid Waste, have the most direct effect on the timing and location of capital improvements. Through planning for future improvements to the transportation system, the Transportation Element directly affects the development potential of property. Also affecting the development potential of property are the water and sewer connection requirements and the availability of parks, and public school capacity. Within the Future Land Use Element (FLUE), the assignment of land use density and intensity, as well as the urban service area regulations, affect the timing and location of capital improvements. Consistent with the FLUE and urban service area requirements in the County's comprehensive plan, the County provides public facilities and services to promote compact development by emphasizing infill development in urban areas and maximizing the efficiency of existing facilities and services in underutilized areas. The FLUE also limits urban sprawl and ensures that adequate facilities will be present to accommodate future growth. Maximizing the use of existing facilities and controlling urban sprawl will contribute to a cost-effective and efficient service delivery system. Using the County's official Future Land Use Map and Future Thoroughfare Plan Map, as well as the County's water and wastewater connection matrix, in planning for future locations of facilities provides for efficient and orderly expansion of public facilities, provides for efficient growth in desired areas, discourages growth in undesirable areas, and protects environmentally sensitive lands. 185 Consistent with that policy, development orders are issued only after a determination is made that adequate public facilities and services will be available to meet the demand of new development. Overall, the objectives of the FLUE, Transportation Element, Parks and Recreation Element, Potable Water Sub -Element, Sanitary Sewer Sub -Element, and the Public School Facilities Element are furthered by the extension of facilities and services in a logical and efficient manner. That is accomplished by implementing the adopted Capital Improvements Element and its corresponding Schedule of Capital Improvements. Successful and efficient implementation of those items ensures that facilities and services will be in place concurrent with future demand. If a capital improvements project is not included in the adopted Schedule of Capital Improvements and the improvement is required to maintain adopted level -of -service standards, future development will be prohibited until the necessary facilities are in place. That, in effect, indirectly controls the timing and location of future development and, in turn, furthers the implementation of the Future Land Use Element and Transportation Element objectives. Appendix A constitutes the County's five year schedule of capital improvements. The purpose of the CIP is to ensure that improvements to existing facilities and construction of new facilities are completed as needed. By implementing the five year schedule of capital improvements, the county will ensure that appropriate areas will be served by needed facilities, thus maintaining adopted levels of service. Besides implementing the components of this element, the County coordinates with the St. Johns River Water Management District (SJRWMD) and the various state agencies, such as the Florida Department of Transportation, when those agencies program facility or service improvements within Indian River County. The continuation of that coordination will ensure that the plans of state agencies and the SJRWMD will be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and the timing and location of capital improvements as identified in the CIE. Forecasted Revenues In order to develop a financially feasible schedule of capital improvements, projected revenues over the five-year CIP time period are calculated. Those revenues are then compared to anticipated expenditures on capital improvements. For the first three years of the plan, only committed and available revenue sources are utilized. In developing revenue estimates for that process, the County considers historic revenue trends, current and anticipated economic conditions, population and growth trends, legislative changes, and any other factors that may impact future revenue streams. That analysis is far more complex than projecting prior trends into the future. That is evident in the forecasted revenues shown in this section. Since the start of the decline of the housing boom and throughout the economic recession that followed, there was a gradual decrease in most of the County's revenue sources. With the ongoing economic recovery, forecasts show for all revenue sources except "Other Sources", an increase in 186 total revenue through FY 2023/24, of 10.38%. The "Other Sources" category included revenue sources such as grants that can vary year to year. Many of the revenue sources identified in the CIP have unique characteristics. For example, sales taxes react differently than gas taxes to similar circumstances. The analysis accounts for such differences. Because gas taxes are levied on a per gallon basis rather than a price percentage basis like the sales tax, gas taxes do not increase as a result of rising prices the way that sales taxes do. Further, gas taxes do not typically decline as significantly as sales taxes during economic slowdowns. For property taxes, impact fees, user fees, interest earnings, and other revenues, additional behavioral characteristics were considered in forecasting future receipts. All such forecasts were developed with the use of professionally accepted methodologies. To ensure a financially balanced CIP (see Appendix A), scheduled expenditures were constrained by projected revenues. As part of this capital improvements element, the County's general revenues were forecasted for fiscal years 2019/20 through 2023/24. This section addresses general revenues and earmarked projected revenues as well as the county's tax base and millage rate projections. Overall Forecasted Revenues Table 6.7 summarizes the County's forecasted revenue for fiscal years 2019/20 through 2023/24. Those revenues include the County's general governmental funds, enterprise funds, and internal funds. As table 6.7 shows, general revenue collected by the County is forecast to decrease from fiscal year 2019/20 to fiscal year 2023/24 with revenues from "Other Sources" such as grants decreasing. Projecting a decrease in grant funding due to uncertainty of future grants is a conservative approach. Actual grant funding may be greater than projected. Table 6.7: Overall General Revenue Projection Summary . FY 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 2023/24 TOTAL Taxes $145,293,007 $148,925,000 $152,648,000 $156,464,000 $$160,376,000 $763,706,007 Permits, Fees & $33,021,441 $33,847,000 $34,693,000 $35,560,000 $36,449,000 $173,570,441.00 Special Assess. Intergovern- $23,501,341 $24,089,000 $24,691,000 $25,308,000 $25,941,000 $123,530,341.00 ment Charges for $83,195,900 $85,276,000 $87,408,000 $89,593,000 $91,833,000 $437,305,900.00 Services Judgements, Fines & $463,120 $475,000 $487,000 $499,000 $511,000 $2,435,120.00 Forfeitures Interest & $9,061,049 $9,288,000 $9,520,000 $9,758,000 $10,002,000 $47,629,049.00 Misc. Other Sources $123,445,299 $112,300,161 $82,680,698 $93,474,906 $72,350,983 $484,252,047 TOTAL $417,981,157 $414,200,161 $392,127,698 $410,656,906 $397,462,983 $2,032,428,905 Source: Indian River County Office of Management and Budget. Community Development Department Indian River County Adopted December 1 2019, Ordinance 2019-_ 28 187 Earmarked Projected Revenues Earmarked revenues are revenues that are restricted in terms of use. Such revenues may be found in the Transportation Element, Sanitary Sewer Sub -Element, Potable Water Sub -Element, and Solid Waste Sub -Element. Table 6.8 provides a summary of earmarked revenue forecasts by applicable comprehensive plan element for fiscal years 2019/20 through 2023/24. As shown.in table 6.8, forecasted transportation revenues are broken down by their sources. Earmarked forecasted transportation revenues are expected to increase by 5.96% over the next five fiscal years, from $28,206,075 in FY 2019/20 to $29,996,211 in FY 2023/24. For potable water and sanitary sewer, earmarked revenue is expected to increase by 9.40% over the next five fiscal years, from $37,117,014 in FY 2019/20 to $40,970,000 in FY 2023/24. Over the next five years, earmarked revenue for solid waste is expected to increase by 9.40% from $16,237,578 in FY 2019/20 to $17,924,000 in FY 2023/24. Table 6.8: Earmarked Projected Revenue by Comprehensive Plan Element Transportation Potable Local 1 cent Fiscal Water & Solid Waste Year as Constitutional County Traffic optional Interest on Total Sanitary Gas Tax* Gas Tax Tax Impact Fee sales tax Gas Tax Sewer 2019/20 $3,600,000 $1,877,925 $815,000 $2,843,150 $19,000,000 $70,000 S28.206,075 $37,117,014 $16,237,578 2020/21 $3,600,000 $1,897,000 $823,000 $2,872,000 $19,380,000 $70,000 $28,642,000 $38,045,000 $16,644,000 2021/22 $3,600,000 $1,916,000 $831,000 $2,901,000 $19,767,600 $70,000 $29,085,600 $38,996,000 $17,060,000 2022/23 $3,600,000 $1,935,000 $839,000 $2,930,000 $20,162,952 $70 000 $29,536,952 $39,971,000 $17,487,000 2023/24 $3,600,000 $1,954,000 $847,000 $2,959,000 $20,566,211 1 $70,000 $29,996,211 $40,970,000 $17,924,000 Source: Indian River County Office of Management and Budget. • Tax Base, Assessment Ratio, Millage Rate Table 6.9 summarizes the county's tax base forecasts which are categorized by fund through FY 2023/24. Overall, the countywide ad valorem tax base is the same as the general fund category identified in table 6.9. no Table 6.9: Indian River County Tax Base and Millage Projections General Fund M.S.T.U. Emergency Services District Environmental Land Fiscal Acquisition Year Tax Base Millage Tax Base Millage Tax Base Millage Tax Base Millage 2019/20 $18,576,104,581 3.5475 $10,222,741,396 1.1506 $15,223,270,315 $18,576,104,581 0.2568 2.3655 1 2020/21 $19,133,387,718 3.5475 $10,529,423,638 1.1506 $15,679,968,424 2.3655 $19,133,387,718 0.2465 2021/22 $19,707,389,350 3.5475 $10,845,306,347 1.1506 $16,150,367,477 2.3655 $19,707,389,350 0.2367 2022/23 $20,101,537,137 3.5475 $11,062,212,474 1.1506 $16,473,374,827 2.3655 $20,101,537,137 0.2272 2023/24 $20,503,567,880 3.5475 $11,283,456,723 1.1506 $16,802,842,324 2.3655 $20,503,567,880 0.2181 Source: Indian River County Office of Management and Budget. As shown in table 6.9, the county has a Municipal Service Taxing Unit (MSTU) and an emergency services district, each with a separate millage. Changes to the Capital Improvements Program All County revenue sources except "Other Sources" are expected to increase at a rate of 2.5% through Fiscal Year 2023/24 and all County revenue sources except for Judgements, Fines & Forfeitures are projected to be above what was previously forecasted in the prior year's Capital Improvements Program. With respect to the "Other Sources" funds, the decreasing yearly amount is due to uncertainty in grant funds, as that funding source is dependent on a number of factors including but not limited to economic conditions, and the competitiveness of grant applications. With this year's update, some projects have had their timeframes extended and some have had their funding sources changed as priorities have shifted, and projects previously underfunded have been designated to receive additional projected funding from sources that have become available. This includes projected increased revenue from assessments and user fees, gas taxes, various impact fees, and developer funded construction projects due to projected increased development activity and continually improving market conditions. While some project time frames have been extended, none of the extensions will impact development project concurrency reservations. By extending the timeframe of transportation projects, the County can utilize its limited resources to complete priority concurrency related projects within the overall capital improvements program. In effect, the County needs to delay some projects so that other projects will remain fundable and so that additional priority projects maybe funded. By funding necessary projects and other priority projects, and by extending the time frames for other projects, the County is maintaining a financially feasible capital improvements element. As allowed by state law, the County can consider the additional capacity to be produced by those anticipated nearer term roadway improvement projects as being available now for concurrency purposes. As such, a development project impacting a deficient link canproceed despite the deficient 189 link, where a roadway improvement project for the deficient link will be under construction no later than three years after issuance of the first building permit for the development project. Needs Assessment' Based on public facility requirements identified in the other comprehensive plan elements, this needs assessment identifies the capital improvements required to provide sufficient infrastructure to meet proposed levels of service for existing and new development. For purposes of the CIE, a capital improvement is a substantial facility (land, building or major equipment) that costs at least $100,000 and may be paid for in phases. Table 6.10 identifies capital improvement needs through fiscal year 2023/24 for conservation & aquifer recharge, emergency services, general services, law enforcement & corrections, recreation and open space, stormwater management, sanitary sewer and potable water, solid waste, transportation, and public schools. Appendix A provides a detailed list of projects associated with each of the comprehensive plan elements as well as those projects associated with individual department capital improvements programs. Not included in Appendix A are projects associated with the Public School Facilities Element. Those projects are found in Appendix C. Detailed capital improvement schedules, which list each improvement project, are provided in each applicable Comprehensive Plan Element or within individual master plans for the respective governmental service. Table 6.10: Future Capital Improvement Expenditures for Iridian River County & Indian River County School District Element or Category 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 2023/24 Total Coastal Management $5,000,000 $20,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $25,000,000 Conservation & Aquifer Recharge $3,439,398 $1,425,000 $1,325,000 $2,325,000 $2,725,000 $11,239,398 Emergency Services $7,421,635 $4,650,000 $2,145,000 $2,700,000 $2,300,000 $19,216,635 General Services/Facilities Management $7,850,000 $2,575,000 $3,375,000 $2,485,000 $1,775,000 $18,060,000 Law Enforcement & Corrections $200,000 $2,650,000 $1,500,000 $4,655,000 $0 $9,005,000 Recreation & Open Space $4,962,878 $3,197,119 $2,080,000 $900,000 $850,000 $11,989,997 Sanitary Sewer & Potable Water $17,772,723 $14,535,279 $17,840,126 $4,440,188 $27,042,233 $81,630,549 Solid Waste $1,570,000 $4,430,000 $50,000 $1,250,000 $7,000,000 $14,300,000 Stormwater Management $9,435,000 $3,300,000 $2,290,000 $200,000 $200,000 $15,425,000 Transportation $40,115,997 $38,158,448 $34,928,572 $54,099,968 $17,000,000 $184,302,985 Total $97,767,631 $94,920,846 $65,533698 $73,055,156 $58,892,233 $390,169,564 Public School Facilities* $12,004,666 $14,969,041 $15,651,343 $23,106,775 $18,576,087 $84,307,912 *The School District of Indian River County has the fiscal responsibility for capital improvement expenditures for public school facilities. Community Development Department Indian River County Adopted December , 2019, Ordinance 2019-_ 31 190 Figure 6.18 graphically displays the forecasted capital improvements expenditures for the County during the next five fiscal years. As indicated, the sum of the total projected costs for each of the elements for the five year period is $390,169,564. Some public facilities, such as public education and health systems, are provided countywide, but are not the fiscal responsibility of the County. The County, however, is required by state statutes to provide some funds to the Indian River County Health Department (IRCHD). Consistent with state law, the Secretary of the Florida Department of Health appoints the administrator of the IRCHD with the concurrence of the Board of County Commissioners. The IRCHD maintains its financial records, and prepares its own financial report separate from the county. In the Public School Facilities Element of the County's comprehensive plan, there is an analysis and description of public schools. Based on general locational criteria for public schools, it is assumed that any new facilities which may be constructed in the County by 2023/24 will be located within existing infrastructure service areas or designated expansion areas. Therefore, those systems may be considered to be adequately served by appropriate infrastructure. Figure 6.18: Future Capital Improvement Expenditures $60,000,000 $50,000,000 $40,000,000 $30,000,000 $20,000,000 $10,000,000 $0 ` FY 2019/20 FY 2020/21 FY 2021/22 FY 2022/23 FY 2023/24 nCoastal Management GCdnservalion and Aquifer Recharge nErergency Services NFaciges Management CLaw Enforcement ■Paftand Recreation ESanitary Sewer B Potable Water asold Waste UStonmwater Management aTransponatlon Source: Indian River Countv Office of Management and Budget. 191 Fiscal Assessment This section examines the County's ability to fund the capital improvements listed in table 6. 10, with the exception of public school facilities, and assesses whether sufficient revenue will be available within the existing budget framework utilized by the County to fund the needed improvements at the time that those improvements will be required. This assessment process consists of forecasting future revenue receipts and comparing those receipts to anticipated expenditures. With this process, it is possible to quantify annual revenue surpluses and shortfalls, providing a basis for examining opportunities for financing needed capital improvements. The expenditure estimates include operating costs. For the public school facilities listed in table 6.10, the School District of Indian River County is responsible for funding the capital improvements. The School District's adopted "Summary of Capital Improvements Program" (Appendix C) and "Summary of Estimated Revenue" (Appendix D) provide a detailed review of the financial feasibility of the School District's Five Year Capital Plan. Projected Expenditures Table 6.11 shows the County's projected expenditures for fiscal years 2019/2020 through 2022/2023. By fiscal year 2023/24, the County is forecasted to have annual expenditures totaling $397,462,983. In FY 2023/24, the category projected to have the largest expenditures is the Public Safety category. For the five-year period beginning in fiscal year 2019/20 and ending in fiscal year 2023/24, the County's expenditures are forecast to decrease by 4.98%. Table 6.11: Indian River County Overall General Expenditures Projection Summary FY 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 2023/24 General Gov't. Services $66,277,888 $62,464,000 $64,761,000 $65,406,000 $66,269,000 Public Safety $109,035,731 $111,249,000 $110,193,000 $116,567,000 $114,242,000 Physical Environment $92,370,545 $85,347,279 $84,703,126 $72,993,188 $103,364,233 Transportation $67,479,332 $66,205,448 $63,676,572 $83,566,968 $47,204,000 Economic Environment $503,942 $517,000 $530,000 $543,000 $557,000 Human Services $9,715,152 $9,958,000 $10,207,000 $10,462,000 $10,724,000 Culture/Recreation $23,672,718 $37,250,119 $16,484,000 $15,664,000 $15,983,000 Debt Service $5,050,341 $3,518,315 $483,000 $482,750 $486,750 Other $43,875,508 $37,691,000 $41,090,000 $44,972,000 $38,633,000 TOTAL $417,981,157 $414,200,161 $392,127,698 $410,656,906 $397,462,983 Source: Indian River County Office of Management and Budget. Community Development Department Indian River County Adopted December , 2019, Ordinance 2019-_ 33 192 Earmarked Projected Expenditures Table 6.12 identifies the projected expenditures for the water, sewer, and solid waste enterprise funds for fiscal years 2019/20 through 2023/24. Those expenditures include operating expenses and other expenses for each year. According to law, all revenues from capacity charges must be spent on infrastructure improvements that benefit the payer of the capacity charge. Therefore, capacity charge revenue and expenditure amounts increase and decrease with development. For that reason, forecasting capacity charge revenues and expenditures is difficult. That system, however, ensures that new development will not reduce levels of service below County minimums. Table 6.12: Projected Expenses for Water, Sewer, and Solid Waste Fiscal Year Potable Water & Sanitary Sewer Solid Waste 2019/20 $54,889,737 $17,807,578 2020/21 $52,580,279 $21,074,000 2021/22 $56,836,126 $17,110,000 2022/23 $44,411,188 $18,737,000 2023/24 $68,012,233 $24,924,000 Source: Indian River County Office of Management and Budget. In FY 2023/24, the forecast expenses for potable water and sanitary sewer services are expected to be $68,012,233. That is an increase of 25.51% from the FY 2019/20 forecast expenses of $54,889,737. Table 6.12 shows that, in FY 2023/24, the projected expenses for solid waste services are expected to be $24,924,000. That is an increase of 39.96% from the FY 2019/20 projected figure of $17,807,578. Operating Cost Projections Table 6.13 provides forecasts of overall operating costs for the County for fiscal years 2019/20 through 2023/24. In fiscal year 2023/24, the County is forecast to incur approximately $299,937,750 in operating costs. Based on the figures shown in Table 6.13, the county's operating costs are forecast to increase 8.54% between 2019/20 and 2023/24. Table 6.13: Indian River ounty Overall Operating Cost Projections Fiscal Year Total Operating Costs 2019/20 $276,338,018 2020/21 $281,588,315 2021/22 $285,504,000 2022/23 $292,629,750 2023/24 $299,937,750 Source: Indian River County Office of Management and Budget Community Development Department Indian River County Adopted December , 2019, Ordinance 2019-_ 34 193 Projected Debt Capacity Debt Financing is one way that the county has provided for its capital facility needs. The primary rationale for providing capital facilities through indebtedness is that it spreads the cost of a facility over its useful life and thus is paid for by those who will use the facility. Table 6.14 identifies the amount of revenue that the County can raise by issuing revenue bonds. Those bonds can be issued without a public vote. That table identifies the County's bonding capacity for 10, 20, and 30 years. As table 6.14 indicates, the County's available bonding capacity for a 10 year issue is $222,800,000, while its bonding capacity for a 30 year issue is $488,800,000. Table 6.14: Indian River ounty Estimated Abili to Raise Bonds Without A Public Vote Pledge Sources Ten Years (Bond Interest Rate @ 1.40%) Twenty Years (Bond Interest Rate 0,1.80%) Thirty Years (Bond Interest Rate @ 2.0% Half Cent Sales Tax $90,500,000 $166)500,000 $226,300,000 Gas Taxes $60,200,000 $108,000,000 $126 500 000 Tourist Tax $19,600,000 $35,200,000 $47,200,000 County Revenue Program First Guaranteed Entitlement $1,900,000 $3 400,000 $4,600,000 County Revenue Program Second Guaranteed Entitlement $3,900,000 $7,100,000 $9,500,000 Sub -Total $176,100,000 $320,200,000 $414,100,000 Possible Pledge Sources Franchise Fees $42,200,000 $75,700,000 $101,600,000 Road Impact Fees $20,900,000 $36700,000 $48,900,000 Sub -Total $63,100,000 $112,400,000 $15015009000 TOTAL $239,200,000 $432,600,000 $564,600,000 *Rates are comparable term AAA rated municipal bond yields as of 9/25/2019. Source: Indian River County Office of Management and Budget. Debt Service Obligations In table 6.15, the County's debt service obligations for current and anticipated bond issues are summarized. Debt service is payment of principal and interest on obligations resulting from the issuance of bonds. As table 6.15 indicates, the County's major anticipated outstanding debts are for 194 water and sewer revenue bonds, environmentally sensitive land acquisition bonds, and spring training facility revenue bonds. 195 Table 6.15 Indian River County Bond Schedule FY Ending Environmentally Sensitive Land Acquisition Water & Sewer Revenue Refunding Bonds Spring Training Facility Revenue Bonds 2015 Series 1.66% $20,369,000 2015 Series 1.65% $7,170,000 2001 Series 4.87% $16,810,000 Interest $120,649 $52,371 $209,238 Principal $4,298,000 $1,042,000 $290 000 Total $4,418,649 $1,094,371 $499,238 2020 Balance $2,970,000 $2,132,000 $3,865,000 Interest $49,302 $35,178 $194,013 Princi al $2,970,000 $1,058,000 $305,000 Total S3,019,302 $1,093,178 $499,013 2021 Balance $0 $1,074,000 $3,560,000 Interest $17,721 $178,000 Principal $1,074,000 S305,000 2022 Total $1,091,721 $483,000 Balance $0 $3,255,000 Interest $162,750 Principal $320,000 Total $482,750 2023 Balance $2,935,000 Interest $146,750 Principal $340,000 Total $486,750 2024 Balance $2,595,000 Interest $129,750 Princi al $355,000 Total $484,750 2025 Balance $2,240,000 Interest $112,000 Principal $375,000 Total $487,000 2026 Balance $1,865,000 Interest $93,250 Principal $390,000 Total $483,250 2027 Balance $1,475 000 Interest $73,750 Princi al $410,000 2028 Total $483,750 195 Source: Indian River County Office of Management and Budget. Fiscal Assessment Summary This section provides an analysis of the County's revenues and expenditures for its capital improvement needs for the five-year period beginning in FY 2019/20 and ending in FY 2023/24. While Appendix A details all of the capital improvement projects for the next five fiscal years for each individual comprehensive plan element by cost, timeframe, and revenue source(s), Table 6.7 provides general revenue projections for the County through fiscal year 2023/24. As shown in Table 6.7, the County will generate $2,031,428,904.50 in revenues from general funds, enterprise funds, and internal funds from fiscal year 2019/20 to fiscal year 2023/24. Sources of those funds include sales taxes, property taxes, grants, impact fees, and other revenues. The funding needed for the capital improvements listed within Appendix A will come from that $2,031,428,904.50. Overall, the County will have enough revenue to cover the costs associated with the five year capital improvements program. For all projects contained within the County's Capital Improvements project list, the total estimated cost is $389,169,564 for the next five fiscal years. This is 19.15% of the overall general fund revenues for the same time period. Concurrency Management Plan To ensure that level -of -service standards are maintained, it is necessary to have a system in place that provides the criteria for measuring facility capacity, assessing development demand on applicable 196 Table 6.15 Indian River CountyBond Schedule FY Ending Environmentally Sensitive Land Acquisition Water & Sewer Revenue Refunding Bonds Spring Training Facility Revenue Bonds 2015 Series 1.66% S20,369,000 2015 Series 1.65% $7,170,000 2001 Series 4.87% $16,810000 Balance $1,065,000 Interest S53,250 Principal S430,000 Total $483,250 2029 Balance $635,000 Interest $31,750 Principal $455,000 Total $486,750 2030 Balance $180000 2031 Interest $9,000 Principal $180000 Total $189,000 Balance $0 Source: Indian River County Office of Management and Budget. Fiscal Assessment Summary This section provides an analysis of the County's revenues and expenditures for its capital improvement needs for the five-year period beginning in FY 2019/20 and ending in FY 2023/24. While Appendix A details all of the capital improvement projects for the next five fiscal years for each individual comprehensive plan element by cost, timeframe, and revenue source(s), Table 6.7 provides general revenue projections for the County through fiscal year 2023/24. As shown in Table 6.7, the County will generate $2,031,428,904.50 in revenues from general funds, enterprise funds, and internal funds from fiscal year 2019/20 to fiscal year 2023/24. Sources of those funds include sales taxes, property taxes, grants, impact fees, and other revenues. The funding needed for the capital improvements listed within Appendix A will come from that $2,031,428,904.50. Overall, the County will have enough revenue to cover the costs associated with the five year capital improvements program. For all projects contained within the County's Capital Improvements project list, the total estimated cost is $389,169,564 for the next five fiscal years. This is 19.15% of the overall general fund revenues for the same time period. Concurrency Management Plan To ensure that level -of -service standards are maintained, it is necessary to have a system in place that provides the criteria for measuring facility capacity, assessing development demand on applicable 196 facilities, and monitoring service levels for applicable facilities. That system will set the parameters for issuing development orders consistent with level -of -service standards. While this concurrency management plan sets policies and establishes a process, the specific application of this system is through the County's land development regulations. As per state requirements, those regulations define the details of the concurrency management system and establish its administrative requirements. The major purpose of the concurrency management system is to detail the specifics of implementing the County's level -of -service standards. For that reason, the concurrency management system must apply to . all development activity in the County. The system must then identify the applicable standards for each facility, the geographic scope of each facility, and the method of monitoring facility capacity changes. Most importantly, this system must specify when facilities are considered available. Project Applicability All development orders issued by the County and identified below must comply with the concurrency management plan and meet level -of -service standards. Development orders are County approvals for construction and/or land development activity. Specifically, development orders consist of the following: comprehensive plan amendments, rezonings, site plan approvals, preliminary plat approvals, development of regional impact (DRI) approvals, planned development preliminary approvals, and building permit approvals for multi --family projects. Within Indian River County, the impact from the construction of a single family home on an existing subdivision platted lot or legally created single-family parcel will constitute a de minimus impact on public facilities and thus be exempt from the concurrency requirement. Concurrency traffic impacts for single-family homes will be accounted for through tracking single-family trips and an annual traffic count update of the County's Concurrency Management System. Single — family trips tracked through this accounting system will be considered in development project traffic studies. Service Standards Level -of -service standards for concurrency related facilities are established in this plan for the following facilities: sanitary sewer, potable water, solid waste, stormwater management, recreation, public schools, and transportation. Those are explained in detail in the applicable comprehensive plan elements. For each facility, level -of -service is a measure of the relationship between demand for the service and the capacity of the facility. Capacity, however, is measured differently for each type of facility. Table 6.16 identifies both the capacity and demand measures for each public facility. Those measures are addressed in detail, and existing capacities are identified in the applicable Comprehensive Plan Elements. 197 Table 6.16: Service Level Measures for Concurrency Related Facilities Public Facility Category Specific Facility Capacity Measure Demand Measure Geographic Scope Transportation Roadway Volume of cars Peak Season/Peak Affected Roadways accommodated over time Direction/Peak Hour Trips Sanitary Sewer Treatment Plant Treatment design capacity Generation Rate (GPD) Service Area Potable Water Treatment Plant Treatment design capacity Generation Rate (GPD) Service Area (GPD) Solid Waste Landfill Volume in active cell (cubic Generation Rate (tons per Entire County yards) capita per year) Recreation Parks Acres of park land Acres of parks per Entire County thousand population Stormwater Management Drainage Volume of water Volume of stormwater Basin conveyances outfalling for design storm Education* Public Schools (K- Number of students Enrolled Students/ Future Service Area 12) accommodated over time Student Generation "Limited to participating Schools owned and operated by the Indian River County School District Concurrency requires that each facility within the geographic scope of a proposed project's impact area have sufficient capacity to accommodate the project's demand. If that capacity is not available, the project cannot be approved. The principal function of the concurrency management system then is to provide a mechanism whereby demand and capacity measures can be compared on a project by project basis. Table 6.16 provides the criteria for establishing a demand to capacity comparison for a proposed project. While most of the characteristics are self-explanatory, one needs clarification; that is the geographic scope for the traffic public facility category. For concurrency purposes, affected roadways are those roadways impacted by a project's traffic. Regardless of size, all projects impact the roadway on which the project fronts. In addition, other roadways further removed from the project may be impacted. For concurrency purposes, two lane roadways which are assigned 8 or more peak hour/peak season/peak direction project trips and four or more lane roadways that are assigned 15 or more peak hour/peak season/peak direction project trips are considered impacted roadways. For transportation concurrency related facilities, level -of -service standards are applied to all impacted roadways. Those level -of -service standards range from A to F and are associated with peak hour/peak season/peak direction trips. Demand Demand is an important component of the concurrency management system. Essentially, demand is a measure of facility use. When compared to facility capacity, demand can indicate the level -of -service for the facility. 198 As depicted in Table 6.16, demand can be measured quantitatively for each public facility category. While the demand function for each facility consists of applying a rate to the number of facility users, estimation of total demand is more complex.. For concurrency management purposes, demand can be divided into three types: existing, committed, and projected. Each must be considered separately for purposes of concurrency management. Existing Demand Existing demand is simply the current level of use for a facility. For a roadway, it is the number of peak hour/peak season/peak direction trips; for a school, it is the number of full-time enrolled students; for water and wastewater treatment plants, it is the existing flow volume measured in gallons per day. Those figures are included within applicable plan elements. Existing demand then reflects the use of a facility by the current population. When compared to capacity, existing demand can show if the facility has unused capacity or if it is functioning over capacity. Existing demand, however, is not static. As population increases and dwelling units come on-line, existing demand increases. Those increases in existing demand can be identified through facility use measurements. For example, regular traffic counts done on roads or treatment plant flow records are examples of facility use measurements indicating existing demand levels. As existing demand levels for facilities are updated, committed demand levels must be reduced if projects representing committed demand have come on-line. Committed Demand Committed demand is a measure of the impact that approved development projects with reserved capacity will have on facilities. When added to existing demand for a facility, the committed demand for that facility will produce a more accurate estimate of unused capacity. That estimate of unused capacity represents the amount of capacity that can realistically be allocated to new projects. Committed demand must be determined by identifying all projects for which capacity has been reserved through issuance of initial concurrency certificates which are still valid. Then the specific facilities that will be impacted by those projects with reserved capacities must be determined; those facilities will be roadways and the landfill, and they may be treatment plants, drainage conveyances, and recreation facilities. Finally, the total demand on each facility attributable to committed demand will be determined. Applicable elements of the plan identify the rates to be applied to each project to determine facility demand. Traffic volumes, for example, can be derived by applying a trip rate to the size of the project. Sanitary sewer and potable water both have rates of 250 gallons per day per equivalent residential unit. Other public facility rates are discussed fully in their applicable Comprehensive Plan Element. 199 Like existing demand, committed demand must be determined on a facility by facility basis. For example, both existing demand and committed demand must be determined for each mai or roadway, each school, each treatment plant, each major drainage conveyance, and the active cell in the landfill. Also, like existing demand, committed demand estimates must be modified as projects are completed; committed demand estimates must also be modified as new development orders are approved and old development orders are terminated. Protected Demand The third type of demand is projected demand. This consists of two types. One is non- committed/non-reserved, single-family lot demand for all subdivisions, while the other is new project demand. Non-committed/non-reserved single-family lot projected demand to the facility impacts associated with construction on individual single-family lots in platted subdivisions and construction on legally established individual single-family unplatted lots and acreage will constitute a de minimus impact on public facilities and thus be exempt from concurrency review. Single-family home traffic impacts will be accounted for through tracking single-family trips for use in development project traffic studies and annual traffic count updates. The second type of projected demand is new project demand. For each new project, demand estimates must be made on a facility by facility basis. Only if sufficient available capacity exists for each facility to be impacted can the project be approved and a development order issued. Upon issuance of a development order, the estimated impacts on each facility would be considered as committed demand. Availability of Capacity Facility capacity can be assessed two different ways. First, facility capacity can be determined by facilities that are existing and available; examples would be existing treatment plants and existing roadways with a set number of lanes. The second manner for assessing facility capacity is to consider both existing, in -the -ground facilities as well as facility expansions or new facilities which are programmed but not yet existing. As part of the concurrency review process, the capacity of existing, in -the -ground facilities will be considered in all cases. Programmed facilities will be considered in assessing capacity for each public facility category when the following conditions are met: ➢ For sanitary sewer, potable water, solid waste and drainage facilities: 200 1. A development order or permit is issued subject to the condition that, at the time of the issuance of a certificate of occupancy or its functional equivalent, the necessary facilities and services are in place and available to serve the new development; or 2. At the time the development order or permit is issued, the necessary facilities and services are guaranteed in an enforceable development agreement to be in place and available to serve new development at the time of the issuance of a certificate of occupancy or its functional equivalent. ➢ For parks and recreation facilities: 1. At the time the development order or permit is issued, the necessary facilities and services are in place or under actual construction; or 2. A development order or permit is issued subject to the condition that, at the time of the issuance of a certificate of occupancy or its functional equivalent, the acreage for the necessary facilities and services to serve the new development is dedicated or acquired by the local government, or funds in the amount of the developer's fair share are committed; and a. A development order or permit is issued subject to a condition that the necessary facilities and services needed to serve the new development are in place or under actual construction not more than one year after issuance of a certificate of occupancy or its functional equivalent; or b. At the time the development order or permit is issued, the necessary facilities and services are the subject of a binding executed agreement which requires the necessary facilities and services to serve the new development to be in place or under actual construction not more than one year after issuance of a certificate of occupancy or its functional equivalent; or c. At the time the development order or permit is issued, the necessary facilities and services are guaranteed in an enforceable development agreement, to be in place or under actual construction not more than one year after issuance of a certificate of occupancy or its functional equivalent. ➢ Transportation supply (capacity). Transportation supply shall be determined on a segment by segment basis. For concurrency purposes, all segments on the county's thoroughfare plan shall be considered. Capacity for segments will be based either on FDOT's generalized capacity tables or individual segment capacity studies approved by the public works director pursuant to the criteria specified in Chapter 952, Traffic. Transportation supply for each segment is: 1. The segment's existing peak hour, peak season, peak direction capacity; or 201 2. The segment's new roadway capacity if facility expansion for the segment is proposed and if: a. At the time a development order or permit is issued, the necessary facilities and services are in place or under construction; or b. A development order or permit is issued subject to a condition that the facility expansion needed to serve the new development is included in the county's adopted five-year schedule of capital improvements and is scheduled to be in place or under actual construction not more than three years after issuance of the project's first building permit or its functional equivalent. The schedule of capital improvements may recognize and include transportation projects included in the first three years of the adopted Florida Department of Transportation five year work program. In order to apply this provision to a facility expansion project, the Capital Improvements Element must include the following policies: i. The estimated date of commencement of actual construction and the estimated date of project completion. ii. A provision that a plan amendment is required to eliminate, defer, or delay construction of any road or mass transit facility or service which is needed to maintain the adopted level of service standard and which is listed in the five-year schedule of capital improvements (for Indian River County, this is included in Policy 1.2 of this Element); or 3. The segment's new roadway capacity if, at the time a development order or permit is issued, the facility is the subject of a binding executed agreement which requires the facility to be in place or under actual construction no more than three years after the issuance of the project's first building permit or its functional equivalent; or 4. The segment's new roadway capacity if, at the time a development order or permit is issued, the facility is guaranteed in an enforceable development agreement, to be in place or under actual construction not more than three years after issuance of a building permit or its functional equivalent. 5. The segment's new roadway capacity if facility expansion for the segment is the subject of a proportionate fair -share agreement. In such case, the segment capacity increase reflected in the proportionate fair share agreement shall be available only to the party or parties to the proportionate fair share agreement. ➢ For school facilities: A residential development order or permit shall be issued only if the needed capacity for the particular service area is available in one or more contiguous service areas. 202 Regulation No development order shall be issued for any project where the project's demand in conjunction with existing demand and committed demand will exceed the capacity of a facility at the service level established in this plan. Level -of -service analysis will be undertaken during the review of each project for which development order approval is required. Monitoring System To effectively implement the concurrency requirement, it is necessary to maintain an estimate of available capacity for each public facility subject to level -of -service requirements. By maintaining an accurate and current available capacity estimate for each facility, projected demand from development applications can be compared to the available capacity for the facility to determine if the project can be approved. The purpose of the monitoring program is to maintain a current estimate of available capacity for each facility. With the exception of public schools, the monitoring system portion of the concurrency management plan is maintained by the county's planning division. Effective July 1, 2008, the School District initiated and now maintains the monitoring system portion of the concurrency management plan for public schools. Using a network computer system and database management software, records were developed and are maintained for each specific facility. Based upon information iri the specific comprehensive plan elements, total capacity figures for each applicable facility are maintained in database files established for each public facility category. Capacity figures are modified as facilities are expanded or as criteria specified in the availability of capacity section are met, thereby allowing a programmed expansion to be considered for capacity determination purposes. Through contact with other county departments, planning staff are able to modify capacity estimates as soon as facility characteristics are changed. Table 6.17 depicts the general structure of the monitoring system database file for each public facility category. That table shows that available capacity for each specific facility is a function of total capacity less existing demand and less committed demand. The demand section of this concurrency management plan identifies the methodology for assessing demand. Table 6.17: Monitoring S stem Design Public Facility Specific Total Capacity Existing Demand Committed Demand Available Capacity Category Facilities Peak season/ peak Annual count (average) Volume estimated from (Total Capacity) - (Existing Traffic Roadways direction/ peak (peak season/peak approved Development Demand) - (Committed Demand) hour (LOS D) direction/peak hour) Orders (DO) Sanitary Sewer Treatment Design flows Existing flows Volume estimated from (Total Capacity) - (Existing Plants approved DO's Demand) - (Committed Demand) Potable Water Treatment Design flows Existing flows Volume estimated from (Total Capacity) - (Existing Plants approved DO's Demand) - (Committed Demand) 203 Table 6.17: Monitoring S stem Design Public Facility Specific Total Capacity Existing Demand Committed Demand Available Capacity Category Facilities MPO Annually Identify existing flows for each water and sewer treatment plant Utilities Solid Waste Landfill Active cell design Active cell volume used Volume estimated from (Total Capacity) - (Existing Annually Estimate existing flows for drainage conveyances capacity Annually approved DO's Demand) - (Committed Demand) Ongoing Do annual student counts (FTE) for public schools to determine existing demand School District (Acres per thousand (Acres per thousand Planning Recreation Parks Park Acreage population) X (existing population) X (projected (Total Capacity) - (Existing population) population for approved Demand) - (Committed Demand) Do's) Drainage Volume of stormwater Drainage Volume Existing flows allowed to outfall for (Total Capacity) - (Existing conveyances approved DO's Demand ) - ( Committed Demand) Public Permanent Annual Enrollment Students estimated from (Total Capacity) - (Existing Education Schools(K-12) Student Stations Count (FTE) approved residential Demand) - (Committed Demand) (FISH) Development Orders) To implement the monitoring system, the following actions shown in table 6.18 will be necessary. Table 6.18: Monitoring System Tasks Action Responsible Department Timing Do quarterly traffic counts for thoroughfare plan roads to determine existing demand Engineering Annually Compile quarterly ridership statistics for all fixed routes MPO Annually Identify existing flows for each water and sewer treatment plant Utilities Annually Estimate Landfill (active cell) volume used Utilities Annually Estimate population and apply park standard to determine park existing demand Planning Annually Estimate existing flows for drainage conveyances Engineering Annually Enter data received from other departments into computer Planning Ongoing Do annual student counts (FTE) for public schools to determine existing demand School District Annually Add estimated demand for new projects to committed demand total upon issuance of DO Planning Ongoing Maintain records of units/projects receiving a certificate of occupancy, maintain demand estimates from those units/projects, subtract estimated demand for those units/projects for committed demand once existing demand is updated Planning Ongoing Applicability The concurrency management plan monitoring system has applicability to more than just level -of - service measurement. It also provides the basis for assessing facility expansion needs and therefore capital improvements programming. By maintaining an accurate and up-to-date estimate of available capacity, the need for facility expansion can be recognized before all capacity is used. By incorporating the monitoring system into the capital improvements programming process, capital budgets can be prepared based on reliable information and valid estimates of need. 204 Goal, Objectives and Policies Goal It is the goal of Indian River County to provide needed capital improvements through the use of sound fiscal decision making. Objectives and Policies Obiective 1: Construction of Capital Facilities By 2024, the county will have completed those capital improvements schedule projects that replace obsolete or worn-out facilities, eliminate existing deficiencies or accommodate desired future growth. Policy 1.1: The county shall maintain a five-year capital improvement program and pursuant to Section 163.3177(3)(b) F.S. evaluate and update that program every year to reflect existing and future public facility needs of the county. This capital improvement program will ensure that the plan is financially feasible and that the adopted level -of -service standards are achieved and maintained. Policy 1.2: The county and the School District shall undertake only those capital improvements included within this element's adopted capital improvements program. Pursuant to Section 163.3177(3)(b) F.S., the Capital Improvements Element will be reviewed every year. If any facility identified in the Schedule of Capital Improvements is delayed or deferred in construction, or is eliminated from the capital improvements program, and this delay, deferral, or elimination will cause the level -of -service to deteriorate below the adopted minimum level of service standard for the facility, a comprehensive plan amendment will be required to adjust the Schedule of Capital Improvements. The annual update of the capital improvement element shall be done with a single public hearing before the Board of County Commissioners and a copy of the ordinance amending the Capital Improvements Element shall be transmitted to DEO. Policy 1.3: The county shall evaluate and prioritize its capital improvement projects based on following criteria. These criteria are ranked in order of importance. ➢ Preservation of the health and safety of the public by eliminating public hazards; ➢ Compliance with all mandates and prior commitments; ➢ Elimination of existing deficiencies; ➢ Maintenance of adopted level -of -service standards; ➢ Provision of infrastructure concurrent with the impact of new development; ➢ Protection of prior infrastructure investments; ➢ Consistency with the county plan and plans of other agencies; ➢ Accommodation of new development and redevelopment facility demands; ➢ Consistency with plans of state agencies and water management districts that provide public facilities within the local government's jurisdiction; 205 ➢ Promotion of compact development by discouraging growth outside of urban service areas; ➢ Demonstration of linkages between projected growth and facility location; ➢ Utilization of the economies of scale and timing of other improvements; ➢ Reduction of operating costs; ➢ Adjustment for unseen opportunities, situations, and disasters. Policy 1.4: The county shall implement the policies of the Potable Water, Sanitary Sewer, and Solid Waste sub -elements of the Comprehensive Plan. Since these are enterprise account funded elements, capital expenditures identified in these elements shall be funded principally from revenues derived from the applicable systems. Polio: The county shall prioritize and implement the programs identified in the Transportation, Recreation and Open Space, Stormwater Management, Conservation, and Future Land Use Elements of the Comprehensive Plan. Policy 1.6: The county shall not eliminate or reallocate budgeted appropriations for road improvement projects required to meet the adopted level -of -service standards unless the applicable projects will be constructed by other means and remain concurrent with the county's Schedule of Capital Improvements. Policy 1.7: The county shall continue to allocate funds for the replacement and the renewal of infrastructure in an amount which will minimize the operating costs of the infrastructure and maximize the life of the infrastructure. Policy 1.8: The county shall manage its long-term general obligation debt in such a manner that the ratio of the debt service millage to the countywide operating millage does not exceed 20%. Policy 1.9: The county hereby defines a capital improvement as an improvement with a cost that exceeds $100,000. Policy 1.10: The Schedule of Capital Improvements shall contain a mix of capital expenditures, including projects to eliminate existing deficiencies, to upgrade and replace existing facilities, and to construct new facilities. Policy 1.11: The county shall maintain a procedure in its annual budget review requiring each county department to include in its annual budget request applicable expenditures as identified in the capital improvements program of the appropriate Comprehensive Plan Element as well as department's capital improvements. Policy 1.12: The county hereby adopts the 2019-2020 through 2023-2024 Indian River County School District Five -Year Facilities Work Plan. The Indian River County School District Five -Year Facilities Work Plan will be evaluated and updated annually to reflect existing and future public school facility needs of the county. This will ensure that the Indian River County School District 206 Five -Year Facilities Work Plan is financially feasible and that the adopted level -of -service standard for public schools is achieved and maintained. Objective 2: Development in Coastal High Hazard Areas Through 2030, development in coastal high hazard areas will not increase beyond the density or intensity levels indicated on the current Future Land Use Map. Policy 2. 1: The coastal high hazard area is defined as the area of the county designated as evacuation zones for a category one hurricane. Policy 2.2: The county shall not increase land use density and intensity, in the coastal high hazard area, beyond that reflected in the county's current Future Land Use Map. Polio: The county shall make appropriations for infrastructure in coastal high hazard areas only to maintain the adopted level -of -service standards. Policy 2A The county shall ensure that the replacement of infrastructure in the coastal high hazard area will be limited to maintaining the adopted level -of -service standards. Policy 2.5: The county shall require that all developments and all single-family units in coastal high hazard areas fully pay the cost for required infrastructure improvements through impact fees, capacity charges, developer dedications, assessments, and contributions. Polio The county shall not use public funds to subsidize increased density or intensity of urban development in coastal high hazard areas; however, public beach, shoreline access, resource restoration, or similar projects may be constructed. Obiective 3: Maintenance of Established Level -of -Service Standards Through 2030, adopted levels -of -service will be maintained for all concurrency facilities. Policy 3.1: The county hereby adopts the concurrency management system as described within this element. The county shall maintain Land Development Regulation (LDR) Chapter 910, Concurrency Management System, which implements the plan's concurrency management system. In accordance with the concurrency management system of this plan and LDR Ch. 910, the county will not approve any development project where the impacts of such a project would lower the -existing level -of - service on any facility below that facility's adopted minimum level -of -service standard. Policy 3.2: The county shall approve development only in accordance with the utility connection matrix identified in the Sanitary Sewer and Potable Water Sub -Elements. 207 Policy 3.3: The county shall, concurrent with the impact of new development, provide the infrastructure necessary to maintain the levels -of -service identified in the various elements of the Comprehensive Plan. Where development is proposed and is consistent with all applicable regulations but one or more public facilities is/are operating at an inadequate service level, the applicant may at his expense make facility improvements to increase facility capacity when such improvements are consistent with county plans and receive county approval. Polio: The county shall make land use decisions based on the planned availability of facilities to maintain adopted level -of -service standards. Policy 3.5: The county hereby adopts Concurrency Management level -of -service standards for public facilities that are established in the other Comprehensive Plan Elements and which are stated below: ➢ Stormwater Management: The county hereby adopts the following level -of -service standard for all new drainage systems within the unincorporated county: ➢ New development requiring major site plan approval or subdivision platting shall construct a complete drainage system to mitigate the impacts of a 25 year/24 hour design rainfall event using the soil conservation service type 2 modified rainfall curves. ➢ Post development runoff for any drainage basin shall not exceed pre -development runoff unless a maximum discharge rate has been adopted and the discharge does not exceed that rate. If a maximum discharge rate has not been adopted for a basin, post development discharge may not exceed pre -development discharge. By 2023, all existing roadways in the county shall be improved to meet the following level -of -service standards: ➢ Minimum road crown elevation for existing roads shall be raised during resurfacing/rebuilding to the flood elevation resulting from the 2 year/24 hour storm event on local streets. ➢ The center two lanes of rebuilt roads must be at or above flood levels resulting from a 10 year 24 hour storm event on Arterial and Collector roads. ➢ All drainage basins will meet the following level of service standard: 10-Year/24 Hour Storm Event The county hereby adopts the following water quality level -of -service standard: ➢ As a minimum, retention of the first one inch of rainfall is required prior to offsite discharge. An additional 50% treatment is required for all direct discharge into the Sebastian River and into the Indian River Lagoon due to its designation as an outstanding Florida water, as required by state law. 208 ➢ Potable Water The following level -of -service standard is adopted for the county's potable water facilities, and shall be utilized for determining the availability of facility capacity and demand generated by a development: ➢ Countywide level -of -service standard of 250 gallons per day per equivalent residential unit. ➢ Solid Waste The following level -of -service standard is adopted for solid waste facilities in the county, and shall be used as the basis for determining the availability of facility capacity and demand generated by a development: Countywide level -of -service standard of 2.2 tons or 3.67 cubic yards per capita for permanent plus weighted peak seasonal population per year. ➢ Sanitary Sewer The following level -of -service standard is adopted for the county's sanitary sewer facilities, and shall be utilized for determining the availability of facility capacity and demand generated by a development: ➢ Countywide level -of -service standard of 250 gallons per day per equivalent residential unit with a peak monthly flow factor of 1.25. ➢ Recreation & Open Space The county adopts the following recreation level -of -service standard: ➢ County wide level -of -service standard of 6.61 recreation acres/1,000 permanent plus weighted peak seasonal population. ➢ Transportation The county adopts traffic circulation level -of -service standards as follows: ➢ Level -of -Service "D" during peak hour, peak season, peak direction conditions, on all TRIP grant funded roads as well as all freeway, arterial, and collector roadways, with the exception of the following two, which will operate at level of service "E" plus 20%. 27th Ave — South County Line to SR 60 43rd Ave — Oslo Road to 16th Street ➢ Level -of -Service "D" plus 20% during peak hour, peak season, peak direction conditions on the following roads until such time that a major capacity improvement, 209 as specified below, is constructed. At such time that the major capacity improvement is constructed, the level of service for that road shall be "D" during peak hour, peak season, peak direction conditions. CR 510 — 66th Avenue to US Highway 1 (scheduled for widening) 37th Street — US Highway 1 to Indian River Boulevard (scheduled for widening or alternatively mitigated by extension of Aviation Boulevard from US 1 to 37th Street) During the time period before major capacity improvements are provided for these two roads, proposed major development projects approved by the planning and zoning commission or board of county commissioners that will impact either or both of the roads may, based on a traffic study approved by the Public Works Director, be approved with conditions related to provisions for interim roadway improvements that mitigate project impacts on one or both roads. For SIS/Florida Intrastate Highway System roadways, level of service `B" is adopted for rural areas, and level of service "C" is adopted for urban areas. Polio The county hereby adopts level -of -service standards for selected public facilities as follows: ➢ Correctional Facilities The county adopts the following correctional facilities level -of -service standard: ➢ County wide level -of -service standard of 4.5 beds/1,000 permanent plus weighted peak seasonal population ➢ Fire/EMS The county adopts the following Fire/EMS level -of -service standard: ➢ County wide (excluding Indian River Shores) level -of -service standard of .089 Stations per 1,000 permanent plus weighted peak seasonal population ➢ Law Enforcement The county adopts the following Law Enforcement level -of -service standard: ➢ Unincorporated County level -of -service standard of 2.09 officers per 1,000 permanent plus weighted peak seasonal population ➢ Libraries 210 The county adopts the following Libraries level -of -service standards: ➢ County wide level -of -service standard of 580 building square feet per 1,000 permanent plus weighted peak seasonal population ➢ County wide level -of -service standard of 3,200 library material items per 1,000 permanent plus weighted peak seasonal population ➢ County wide level -of -service standard of 0.7 computers per 1,000 permanent plus weighted peak seasonal population ➢ County wide level -of -service standard of 0.2 other library equipment items per 1,000 permanent plus weighted peak seasonal population ➢ Public Buildings The county adopts the following Public Buildings level -of -service standard: ➢ County wide level -of -service standard of 1.99 building square feet per capita for permanent plus weighted peak seasonal population. ➢ Schools The county adopts the following Schools level -of -service standard: Schools (School Service Areas): ➢ 100 percent of Florida Inventory of School Houses (FISH) capacity for each public school type (elementary, middle, and high). ➢ Transit The County adopts the following transit level -of -service standard: ➢ One-hour headways shall be maintained on all fixed transit routes. Objective 4: Future Development's Share of Capital Costs Through 2030, new developments will bear a proportionate share of the cost required to maintain adopted level -of -service standards. Policy 4.1: The county shall use impact fees, capacity charges, assessments, developer dedications and contributions, to pay for infrastructure improvements and services needed to satisfy future needs while maintaining adopted level -of -service standards. Policy .4.2: The county shall conduct research to identify new sources of revenue for funding capital improvement projects. Objective 5: Local Government's Ability to Provide Required Services and Facilities 211 Through 2030, the county will ensure that it is able to fund and provide required services and facilities. Policy 5.1: The county shall not approve land use amendment requests unless those requests are consistent with the concurrency management system requirements of this element. Policy 5.2: In the event that the planned capacity of public facilities is insufficient to serve all applicants for development orders, the county shall schedule capital improvements to serve developments in the following order of priority: ➢ Single-family units in existing platted subdivisions or on existing legal, buildable parcels ➢ Affordable housing projects ➢ New development orders permitting redevelopment ➢ New development orders permitting new developments where the applicant funds the infrastructure expansion in exchange for future reimbursement ➢ New development orders permitting new developments without developer participation Policy 5.3: The county shall extend facilities and services to serve areas only within the existing Urban Service Area or as allowed by Policy 5.7 of the Potable Water Sub -Element and Policy 5.8 of the Sanitary Sewer Sub -Element of the Comprehensive Plan. Policy 5.4: The county shall coordinate with other local, state, and federal agencies as well as private entities to create an efficient capital improvements schedule that provides the following general benefits while minimizing the financial burden of providing facilities and services: ➢ Reduction of overall capital and operating expenditures by the development of multi -use facilities; ➢ More efficient land use patterns and phasing; ➢ Reduction of overlapping, duplicating, and administrative procedures; ➢ Implementation of adopted physical, social, and economic goals and policies in a least -cost manner; ➢ Better coordination of public capital investment with private capital expenditures. Polio: The county shall continue utilizing enterprise funds for the provision of Sanitary Sewer, Potable Water, and Solid Waste facilities. The debt for enterprise funds is to be paid by user fees, capacity charges, and other appropriate sources. Policy 5.6: The county shall finance the capital cost of non -enterprise fund supported public facilities (e.g., roads, stormwater management, and parks) from current revenue, bond issues, impact fees, capacity charges, assessments, and other appropriate sources. Policy 5.7: The county shall use general obligation bonds and other sources to raise the funding required to provide those public facilities that cannot be constructed with user fees, revenue bonds, impact fees, capacity charges, or other dedicated revenue sources. 212 Polices 5_8: Developments, which require public facility infrastructure improvements that will be financed by county debt, shall have their development orders conditioned on the issuance of the county debt or the substitution of a comparable amount of non -debt revenue. Policy 5.9: Pursuant to state law, the Schedule of Capital Improvements may be adjusted by ordinance and not deemed to be an amendment to the Comprehensive Plan when the amendment relates to corrections, updates, or modifications concerning costs, revenue sources, acceptance of facilities pursuant to dedications which are consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, or the date of construction of any facility except transportation facilities enumerated in the Schedule of Capital Improvements. For transportation facilities, a delay in construction of a facility which causes the level -of -service of that facility to deteriorate below the adopted minimum level -of -service standard for the roadway will require a comprehensive plan amendment. Policy .10: The county shall ensure that all capital improvements identified in the various elements of the Comprehensive Plan are completed according to schedule. The only acceptable delays will be those which are subject to one of the following: ➢ Projects providing capacity equal to, or greater than, the delayed project are accelerated within or added to the Schedule of Capital Improvements; ➢ Modification of development orders issued conditionally or subject to the concurrent availability of public facility capacity provided by the delayed project. Such modification shall restrict the allowable amount and schedule of development to that which can be served by the capacity of public facilities according to the revised schedule; or ➢ Amendment of the plan to reduce the adopted standard for the level -of -service for public facilities until the fiscal year in which the delayed project is scheduled to be completed. 213 Implementation, Evaluation, and Monitoring Implementation An important part of any plan is its implementation. Implementation involves execution of the plan's policies. It involves taking actions and achieving results. For the Capital Improvements Element, implementation involves various activities. While some of these actions will be ongoing, others are activities that will be taken by certain points in time. For each policy in this element, table 6.20 identifies the type of action required, the responsible entity for taking the action, the timing, and whether or not the policy necessitates a capital expenditure. To implement the Capital Improvements Element, several different types of actions must be taken. These include: development of mechanisms for funding new facilities, adoption of land development regulations and ordinances, execution of interlocal agreements, coordination, and preparation of studies and evaluation and monitoring reports. Overall, the Capital Improvements Element implementation responsibility will rest with the Office of Management and Budget. Besides its responsibilities as identified in table 6.18, the planning department has the additional responsibility of ensuring that other entities discharge their responsibilities. This will entail notifying other applicable departments of capital expenditures to be included in their budgets, notifying other departments and groups of actions that must be taken, and assisting other departments and agencies in their plan implementation responsibilities. As part of the Capital Improvements Element, the county has developed a Concurrency Management Plan, which ensures the maintenance of the adopted level -of -service standards. Through the Concurrency Management Plan, the county will measure facility capacity, assess development demand, and maintain a Capital Improvements Program which ensures that the level -of -service standards are maintained. Table 6.19: Capital Improvement Element Implementation Matrix Policy Type of Action Responsibility Timing Capital Expenditure 1.1 Maintain the CIP OMB/PD Ongoing No 1.2 Follow the CIP PD Ongoing No 1.3 Prioritize capital improvement projects OMB/PD/SD Ongoing No 1.4 Implement recommendations Appropriate County Departments/SD Ongoing Yes 1.5 Prioritize and implement programs Appropriate County Departments/SD Ongoing Yes 214 Table 6.19: Capital Improvement Element Implementation Matrix Policy Type of Action Responsibility Timing Capital Expenditure 1.6 Maintain previous commitments BCC/PWD/SD Ongoing No 1.7 Replacement and renewal of infrastructure Appropriate County Ongoing No Departments/SD 1.8 Budget Management OMB/SD Ongoing No 1.9 Define capital improvement PD/OMB Ongoing No 1.10 Capital Budget Management OMB/SD Ongoing No 1.11 Capital Improvements Management OMB/SD Ongoing No 1.12 School District Fiver -Year Facilities Work Plan SD Ongoing Yes 2.1 Define costal high hazard area DCA Ongoing No 2.2 Maintain density and intensity levels of current FLU PD Ongoing No Map 2.3 Budget management Appropriate County Departments Ongoing Yes 2.4 Maintain LOS standards Appropriate County Ongoing Yes Departments 2.5 Funding mechanisms BCC/Private Developers Ongoing No 2.6 Infrastructure replacement strategy Appropriate County Ongoing No Departments 3.1 Maintain concurrency management system PD Ongoing No 3.2 Follow connection matrix of Comprehensive Plan Sub- Appropriate County Ongoing No Elements Departments 3.3 Maintain adopted LOS standards PD Ongoing No 3.4 Land use decisions BCC Ongoing No 3.5 Adopt LOS standards BCC/SD/Appropriate County Departments Ongoing No 4.1 Impose regulations Appropriate County Ongoing Yes Departments 4.2 Conduct research OMB/PD Ongoing No 4.3 Work with municipalities BCC/SD/Other Local Ongoing No Governments in IRC 5.1 Approve land use changes only if infrastructure can BCC Ongoing No support land use change 5.2 Prioritize capital improvements BCC/SD/Appropriate Ongoing No County Departments 215 Table 6.19: Capital Improvement Element Implementation Matrix Policy Type of Action Responsibility Timing Capital Expenditure 5.3 Extension of facilities and services BCC/Appropriate County Ongoing No Departments Appropriate County 5.4 Create an efficient capital improvements schedule Departments/Other Ongoing No Government Agencies 5.5 Utilize enterprise funds OMB Ongoing No 5.6 Finance non -enterprise fund supported projects OMB Ongoing No 5.7 Fund the construction of public facilities OMB/SD Ongoing Yes 5.8 Permitting Requirements BCC/Appropriate County Ongoing No Departments 5.9 Amending the Schedule of Capital Improvements BCC/OMB/PD/SD Ongoing No 5.10 Complete the Schedule of Capital Improvements BCC/SD/AppropriateCounty 2024 No Departments 5.11 Adopt a Priority Transportation Capital Improvements BCC/PWD/MPO Ongoing No Schedule BCC = Board of County Commissioners DCA = Department of Community Affairs FDOT = Florida Department of Transportation MPO = Metropolitan Planning Organization OMB = Office of Management and Budget PD = Planning Department PWD = Public Works Department SD = School District Evaluation and Monitoring Procedures To be effective, a plan must not only provide a means for implementation; it must also provide a mechanism for assessing the plan's effectiveness. Generally, a plan's effectiveness can be judged by the degree to which the plan's objectives have been met. Since objectives are structured, as much as possible, to be measurable and to have specific timeframes, the plan's objectives are the benchmarks used as a basis to evaluate the plan. Table 6.20 identifies each of the objectives of the Capital Improvements Element. It also identifies the measures to be used to evaluate progress in achieving these objectives. Most of these measures are quantitative, such as adopting land development requirements, which ensure the maintenance of the level -of -service standards, adopting a capacity monitoring system and others. Besides the measures, table 6.20 also identifies timeframes associated with meeting the objectives. The Planning Department staff will be responsible for monitoring and evaluating the Capital Improvement Element. This will involve collection of data and compilation of information regarding facility capacity, expansion, and new development permitted. This will be done on a regular basis. 216 As part of the county's Concurrency Management System, the Planning Department will continually monitor the facility capacity to ensure that level -of -service standards will be maintained. Table 6.20: Capital Improvements Element Evaluation Matrix Objective Measure Timeframe 1 Existing deficiencies in county services and/or obsolete or worn-out facilities 2024 2 Land use density and intensity in Coastal High Hazard Area 2030 3 Level -of -service provided for county services 2030 4 Existence of appropriate Land Development Regulations 2030 5 Completion of the Schedule of Capital Improvements 2030 While monitoring will occur on a continual basis, formal evaluation of the Capital Improvements Element will occur annually. The formal evaluation and appraisal of the entire Comprehensive Plan will occur every ten years (dependent upon the schedule adopted by the Florida Department of Community Affairs). Besides assessing progress, the evaluation and appraisal process will also be used to determine whether the Capital Improvements Element objectives should be modified or expanded based on revisions to state statutes and changing conditions not identified and addressed as part of the annual CIE update. In this way, the monitoring and evaluation of the Capital Improvements Element will not only provide a means of determining the degree of success of the plan's implementation; it will also provide a mechanism for evaluating needed changes to the plan element not otherwise addressed in the yearly update of the Capital Improvements Element. As discussed in the above paragraphs, the evaluation and monitoring procedures identified for the Capital Improvements Element are basically the same for the entire Comprehensive Plan. These procedures have been used in the past to prepare the county's Evaluation and Appraisal Report and will be used by the county in subsequent Evaluation and Appraisal Reports. The monitoring and evaluation of this plan is critical to ensure that the policies are effective in achieving the plan's goals and objectives. Each individual element of the plan contains provisions and measures to be used in the review of the element. Each element contains an Implementation and Evaluation Matrix and monitoring procedures, which are currently being used to prepare the current Evaluation and Appraisal Report and will be used to prepare future Evaluation and Appraisal Reports. In addition, a great portion of the plan monitoring will be in conjunction with the concurrency management system which is designed to ensure that approved level -of -service standards are maintained and that sufficient capacity exists in the various services and facilities. Other evaluation of the plan or plan elements is likely to occur in the day to day application of the mandated regulations, which will result in plan amendments. 217 The formal Evaluation and Appraisal Report required by law is currently providing and in subsequent versions will provide a complete review of the plan and be conducted in compliance with the public participation procedures adopted for the development of this plan. As part of the monitoring system, all appropriate baseline data is currently being updated and will be updated. Besides assessing progress, the evaluation and appraisal process is and will also be used to determine whether the objectives should be modified or expanded. In this way the monitoring and evaluation of the Comprehensive Plan Elements not only provides a means of determining the degree of success of the plan's implementation; it also provides a mechanism for evaluating needed changes to the plan element. FACommunity Development\Comprehensive Plan Text Amendments\CIE\2019\2019 Capital Improvements - Clean for Ordinance.doc 218 9- 000000000000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 coo 0 0 x 0 0 0000000000X0000 0 010 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 e0 0 O 0 0 o 0 0 N 0 0 0 0 01 O 0 0 10 N 10 M t0 O N O e'1 N U'i O t0 10 fA e'� m l0 O N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 0 10O r o o O C 0 O O_ tD �' F en Vi en M M � rn en -en en»in en 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 OO 0 0 O O 0 0 en fn O O O O to O O en fA O O O o O O N 0 0 O N O O O O O 0 0 0 0 - N O NO NM O 10 O nM O O O O V jA fn to to to Vi fA LL O O 0 0 C o 0 0 O C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 00 0000000000000000 ' o0 0 o o a a a to w en en rn oo O 10 O 0 0 0 0 0 O nj MN O N O O 10 O O O VI y1 rM en 69 69 di b�9 o 0 O O 0 0 O O 0 0 O O 0 00 O O 0 CO. 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o o 00000000000000 0 C en en en rn en w o 0 00000 0 o O en en en en en N O 000 0 N On N N V) y en en rA «n o o O O o o O O 0 0 O O 0 0 O O 0 0 O O 0 0 O O 0 0 O O 0 0 o O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C ren en en en en en 0 0 0 0 o en 0 o en 0 vs w vs o N o a o 0000i o C O O O O o O O 0 0 O O 0 0 O O 0 0 O O 0 0 O O 0 0 O O 0 0 O O O� 0 O OO 0 O W O en O O o O W en N r di en en O 0. N V N N 100 N t�0 1�f1 Vi 100 eN0 fn V QJ jn N r M � b9 fn en fn y en Lu V `o a '- C C L 0 LL E v O E m L mLL M N rn O C o 0 v C) C ? m o M a` -6 m Z c ' c LL D_ v o x CO W A L°w 4U w~ a d c y C7 c N LL w _o rn� g (7 2i n E Q a c U N c> �C�= mavo6 E �v rnQ C o mesa L v u 'ZS 0 0_ z o JO_ N m m n lO no .>caN°i U LL Z N n T o 0: CL U E �cp 2 J d U fit J >i U 0 f- F 9- 0 Q c o o oep7B iEn C 3 L d G J u t 9 G L LL IL < E W G N pD G T y " O ' c � G a � o pp a z r 0 } } } } } } } } } z } z 0 z o z } } } } } .E v c w° c CO O O D! Q 4 a Q O m a m O O Q $ Q a O F 12 in � fn fA fA � � FN/f � fA fA Fit }O 0 FA 0 O O 0 O O dl 0 fA 0 0 fA fi! 0 O O !A 0 O O I1! 0 0 O to O M fn o N c o 0 h D fA o c fA O !A o N 0 fA 0 K O r {L C O O fA O C O O fA O O O N O O in O O fit O C fA O fA O O to {A O y C K O fA O fA O fA O O N Z2 Vt O O O O N r a C O C O v01 O O O O O FA C O O Vi O M O O (/1 fn O fn O Fit C (A O N O fit C O N EA O Fn O � O F1! 0 Y k. 0 dt 0 Fn 0 o c 0 0 rn 0 0 fn Fn 0 0 fn 0 0 vt » 0 fn 0 0 » 0 Fn 0 o o 0 N 0 0 Fn Fn 0 fn 0 fn 0 vt Q(n O } a o in 0 N 0 F/1 fA 0 FA 0 fA L C � Q Q ❑ _ — —4 c v M < n M o n y r 3 3 o c Q E > E > Q G � E E c 0 e 0 E o ep pp 9g _ o 3 0 o 0 0 co cc it 0 0°Y o 0 v Z LZ 0C 0 � v � i G c 'E 'E E N' fn fn '" e Y G == co v m u E g E e E eE E eee E E v d v aan u G uSC u v u E € €c o o �. G` G =•E -E = n = -- c c c �• G7 < d! G G< S r 0 S 3 2' c' O E E S F S F- = a S S S ° ° 0 co Q N U C C � E R Q R 08 N G � ^ICo ER � � z A �o 'b E v E o C U Q a O U O C E Tc E � z E Et E o s ac a V >.'•+. n e i n t E a C T — q L � Q' 6 T y U � 0 s T � a 0 0 } r r r r I �6 z E i cEo g' v u c U m K m 4' c Y. o f F oge = u C � c c vi N � o• vi N N O' h a o � a E E Ci c ,n n h .. 0 c e 3 O O a ¢'. a m v �i O O F 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 C 0 O 0 O 0 O N 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O a M O } c v> o fn o (n c vi c vi o 0 Fn o �n c » o o 0 (n 0 Fn 0 o 0 69 0 o o Yi 0 vi 0 O c (A N N } O fn O dl O f/1 O (n O df O fn O V3 O fn C fl3 O C O O O O O O O O O � O fn O y O O O O O } O M O i/1 O O O O (� O fn C O VI O fA O 4i O O O O O O O f9 O fA O O O O } O N O. C R. O O y O O � — fn M (fi O O h bpi O O O R M O O V1 H fA N b Vf Vi in fA fA fA O O N df N C E Q c a c n$ o = 8 8 v 8 .2 c •• c u c > > � y" > u— i s d E a c o 0 o c 3 u uO n U U U E O E O€ E O E' O n b G L a C S y> y C> P 1 G C L U YU c U U y v v V• U U U. U E c 2 c c y c u o =-I c 0 m> E> h E m E m o E L y w — Oa"' OZ ? 3.E U Ua' Uv U co Q N U C C � E R Q R 08 N G � ^ICo ER � � z A �o 'b E v E o C U Q a O U T C O C y C Z T U n O p .2 2 ; w vd0_.wza U neo: n a 3 ¢'. en c a: '- a •:. c: z n � u 3 Cr _ 0 0 9 z z z z z z z z z z Y Y Y Y i E E o � � •o p O c E x v v v- S e1. o h 3 N p cL c c U C) h h c E v — p C z C (] C N z C U 4 O O C O O F 30 O 25 O 5 h 25 ol U O I O O a m° O F o 0 0 � c 0 0 IA o 0 o 0 N F/1 0 0 c o P fA 0 0 o {A 0 o o c � in 0 c c o 4f 0 o c c � 0 0 c o N fA 0 o c 0 •- fA 0 c c 0 � FA 0 o c 0 � 4�i 0 0 o 0 FA 0 0 O 0 � h 0 0 o 0 N iA 0 0 O 0 — o 0 o o in x a N — 0 o 0 O_ 0 �n 0 vi 0 o 0 O 0 �n 0 o 0 vOi 0 (n 0 o 0 vOi 0 0 0 O_ o 0 0 O_ c 0 0 O_ o o 0 O_ 0 rn 0 Fn 0 o 0 O 0 o 0 0 vOi c 0 0 N Y w w O O O O fn C O O fA O O O fA O � O fn O fn O O O C df O O O O fn O N O Vi O i/3 O i9 O O O O M O (A O C C O (� .. C G h di O O N N M O O O O i� O N O O O O in O fn O O O O � O � O in O in O y C O O O O O O di O O O M N Y w � 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o o 0 0 0 0 0 0 c c o c o c o c Y w c N Y w 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o c o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 p: L N p p C y C U C Y Y C L C Y C E E E E v C vc c c c c n � 'C 9 � a n E c t c o Z y °' u < < < u v v v E di i E E ai E V 3 0 3 c c � � 912v? < •e < < •� < < < < < < 3 c v Z v v Cv CU - 'v Y L V L d d Y L y 0 O O O U U v VE v c w c c ..cn. c c v c c vg E E E E r. r a r •L o p p._ U ° u V o._ U n o._ U � o.- U o._ V o.- U o.- U ° O' 0 E o E E E p F o •y S` c I c •c c �� c 'c - ay Eu Ow O svol 2 F.Co' F�o, •�n cc �n -p . > 5 c o o".0 -.. to pO, °`L' se yc c cEO vCap c A [onil m Np Ca . U1 T 0 z C. O N N U F C � C U E rJ A O ++ N c O o L Y A � E � z N -—— r N T a G U Q C G T" Y r O C G . O U aa� T y U N T v O V � v � n. n n N-- iY _ q n n n n C � C — C F E E c c E c c E c E c Ev cc .. m m O O m 0 O m O m O m 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 vi 0 0 o c 0 0 o o` o g o v+ o 0 ri o ri �c _ G (A fA N Vi N h�— o c o 0 o co 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N N Y Fn Hf 0 0 in d1 O O O O vOi- N 0 0 O O V3 h 0 0 O O C O O 0 0 - - Vi O O O N 0 0 - - V3 N- 0 0 - - in 0 00 - O d! O O O N 0 - O H r 0 0 O O 0 0 O O O v3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 O O K 0 0 � } 0 0 0 0 1 o N 0 vi v 0 v 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C O O O �+i v3 O O O O - O O O to - O O - - - - - - - O O Vi r Lr. 0 0 0 o a 0 0 0 O O 0 0 O O O O C O O h in in C O 00 O v� of Yl - in r Lr. `o_ 0 o E yy 2 y G C C n d U U T Vl V] n u y U -� E E E cimuEa4<'aiiii HFOmmmmr7,F N Q C. O N N U F C � C U E rJ A O ++ N c O o L Y A � E � z � U yQ a G U Q C O U 0 Z � � T Y C C �d to a T y c w C• 9 T 9 Y 9 � •O �_ O m m m m ai f%1 y N °1 N h y h y fA V1 h N N V] N VJ V] V] N N V1 —" —o —0 —0 —cc — c �- -"� c c c 2 co oc ococ oc� oc 0cc cc oc cc o O OE O O 00 co 0 o 0 c 0 0 o 0 0 0 c c o 0 0 c O c o 0 o c 0 c o p o 0 0 c o 0 0 0 0 0 0 o C 0 0 0 0 C o 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 o c p o 0 0 c c 0 o g o 0 0 c O o O o c vi n o o� O O o O c o vyyt 0 N of 0 t� b R 0 o h vi o n O 0 O 0 0 b pOp aOa F d' C O O O O O O C O O O O OC C O C 0 0 0 0 O O O Vi fA f/) fA fn !/i N fA O O O fH O Vl K (A M O C O C O O F13 fn O O O C O O � N r w p fA O M� O O O N OO O p O 0 0 0 0 C O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 p O 0� O M O O G� O di fn N C O O O O 0 O O 0 0 V3 fA 0 0 0 0 0 0 N h (A N fA N (A N N N � O O O fn O O (/i 0 O O fA O 0 O O O N 0 C O N Vi 0 0 O H1 o 0 O Vi O c O O M M O O O O o 0 O O fn f/1 0 O 0 0 0 O O 0 0 N O O O O C � N O O N � N r c fA c c o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 M in N O O L O O b1 h V! VI O V! O F/1 N N FA N O�� O O 0 O O 0 0 h O O O O O vi O (A N M r Ls. O O O O O O O O O O O O in O O O fn O O O O O O O O C O O O O O O O O f/I O O O VI M O OO N C O C O O O O C 0 C O C 0 0 O O O N rt n O O N� O } c m vc c � c c c N ais < N E C c C v > q c U 3 o ov co o ca vc E c o y a t m c w < c E ` ? y n c m E E •y E o y D m v ..1 a Z o .E 3 p ac w 3 g g �� � � V° E cn c a cv 3 v 3 .�' m co m :-0 w U U s U a a 3 3 a 3 r.5 r �� r O=< U u c 0� u' W Z Z 0 m 0 m m Z v m F O O w vl O 0 mu L 7 Z O 7 Z O 5_ Z C LL] Z U L} U U •O O C w 0 z n n - ea c �• .o T " G LEp O C• 7 T � d v. � c h E m m v - u Qi V1 h N � C C G n 3 '- O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o vi F Q M c c vi vi o vi o c Fn d3 O r NI F/1 O O O O O O O O O O N o N � � r m o � o 0 0 N 0 0 N } � � Li O O O O � O � O di M d3 r {L dl d! H1 O O O O NO T O N vi O N M } Lr. C 0 2 C 0 2 c C`L 0 c 0 G 0 c v 0 0 0Eu c x d E T 5 O vv` C O 9 �y I W A U U U E L W Q W L E a m y _ Q 9 L 'Ea E z aU°� 0 0 0 O O y L _ V O O CD q y a n `� _UU _ _ uu O k 0 of t-0 '.nom O tR:C . h — O eC O O a N O L O G" Z O N O e O .� a c G '•: p O 'O c° ttai� e�i E O Yi. o S w« 3 VI OD N T = T — C a r. r 3 G S 1' r} r r r r z° } = a v v fn u rLi L G E E F fi 12 Z y a � -S = r o o o O a r vi �c o0 b n N o o O �i ? ri V1 0 o O 0 0 O F N N } {i NI O } e } cz O O a O N } {L O O YJ b O O N W O. O } W fn V vi �O �O O O O O O L n O G O c Z _ a Env Y < < ¢ a 'O g v O eD p, di °d °d .o o t c c c 4. c r E E U a o E E = E U a i > > o <c`n> E E E < t < < e a 7_ 3 °—' E c r -E U E L W Q W C� - a• r � w0 U LL C y� — r � on Y o c ? - a v F a a r 3 F;, S C• S T a Y �zz }z ti Ll Y >^Y Z z z z i.Z� Yi c Yi LL u e"i Yi' Yi Yi Yi 0 u `u E � � rn rn � •� � h � h .. � rn � rn � � � a O O a u. a 0 a O a a O c. O a a F o 0 c 0 0 c 0 0 o oco 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 I- c o 0 0 0 0 A 0 0 o 0 0 c 0 D c N 0 0 o c c c En o o c n a a F d H 0 Y w 0 0 0 0 D o c o 0 o N vi 0 0 0 0 o c h vi 0 0 0 0 0 0 c o � w n O > Q6 O M O fn O M O O 6A fA O O N fA C fA 0 6A 0 0 fn O O 00 O O O O O O 47 O O O M O O O iA O O O OO N � .•. N O in O (n O (/) O 0 O �/1 O � 0 0 O G O O N ii9 O N O d1 O O dl n7 O Ln O N O df C O O fn O Vi O O O b M O O O N � w O N 0 d 0 d 0 d 0 0 o 0 c c o o o - r a M w 0 c o c c c o 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 O eo L y y :p y L y a J U n v F E z x y E U E cn o _ 44 c v: y E i U c'n y o 0 G C G E. 4 .v O C VI Vl E E E y U 3 c 3> a 0. E c c c c c '> y o L u y A �> E o E.. Q E U c 'o a v. U �; 3' a � LU s 11 = E z m' a z 3 3 m a a z F F F C� r - R 0. V i c u t L a u C" C L v r DoE__ cc C � W U C C j t � � y N T 04 Y � . C a� T � 3 O L00 ; z } r > } } } z° z° z° z z z z z° z° z z z° z° z z° E E E E E E S O "J. Y LL LL Y LL Y LL Y LL Y LL i _ v a% u T u T'o No h E m E v O o— N E i E u T u �. u T _T u- E— y= E - - O O O LL LL O G LL u_ U [L U U LL CO {L C vi L y L y G G L� G v�•i U y v� •� n V vUi C y 6 d 6 6 d 'G y C y ULL ULL OOciOG 7 < 5 0 0 G 5 <Uti ULL ULL ULL BOG :70< O O O OO O O O O V V O P O M V O^ O a n n N int C C b O O 0 O 0 O O O O O 0 O 0 0 O O O< O 00 R n O O O o: O O st �n V e+i oC r O N V O O O O C N O vi O M CN (A M fn fn — in 0 o n N � � } LL r � » } 0 0 0— N o n r O O O O da N N •- fn R (A �D } LL IL0 0 0 0 O O n C h r n r T N N O O (A N Ya � }}C iay O O O O O C O C O O G V) Vi O O N fA C O C O h O O O O N O to C fA 0 O O 0 � O O O O fn O O O O � O (A 000 f/3 fn LA O V! O O fA V3 O O O (9 Hi ^ N O (A fA h N cSO 2 2 2 2 2 c c o 0 U o U U .� c U u o U c U . � o U U t U U �.. O o U D 0 0 U U N 0 0 U U r C � a a G N < N m N m N c O C < a 3 h r G 6 d L L G C 23 � � r E E U U c U U .12 y 3 ea! c v ani � a a � `yc• a3 ��°. t c a ay, t-0 O CO CO y t eD rd 00 O 7w 7tv 0 7w C C 7_czi �i v O C" O 7_ � � T Y C •C aG T w o a j G`W b T L m z z z z } z z }, r z z z z z z z z z z z z z r z O 6 E 6 E G E Y 6 E Y 6 E G E Y 6 E c E Y c E u `u cu s „h �i y yu O T � v ti U �, ti U v u vu v� �• v. U T vu ai T U T u T L n E �, �, •• d .d y r �.• �• G N V Y d 6 v Y 6 1 d G y d G V L L d G N v -;.,I 6 y _ 6; 6 y 50 0 <5 0 0 50 0 a Uri o 0 7y '� :SIU o c ri c j o Uti o j c Uti o O c Uti o J'j 0 0 0 Uri 0 O 0 Uri 0 Uri 0 Uo. 0 a` rn a o O O O O N O O N 00 O O O O O in O O rA 0 0 C Fn O o to O I O — n O o » O x^ r� F d � o v� c o o o O O N oOC p p rn n o p » rn o rn 0 0 rA Fn 0 - 0 vi o o O v01 O » o c G O p Fn o o O vpi O -- c o - O vpi 0 - 0 vi o » O v3 cn v> N � o n o N N O Q N Y ? C C O O t7 N O M O O fA W C O Vi f9 O G O M O VI O O in N O O O � O (A O O O vi O N O to C M C O fn O N O vl O M O fA O� fA oo O W O N � N (f N O O--- O n O O O o -- p OO O O O O O -- O O M O O O h O O O M O - O O O O O - O N O N -- iA O h O h - O oOG oQ0 C ~ Od0 OdC O r R } Gs. c ♦n o 0 en �n 0 o o » O c o o rn O n 0 0 % vi 69 o v� O vi oc vj vi v> o O to Fn - rn o O o O vi o O N r ry N O (L fA N Fn iA � O N N O C � W O h O in O fn O da O fA O di O h O O O p iA C O O M O M O O O � r r n 0 W G C ... C C C C O N ^ U U rj U s U o U U m U U o O L 4] •E E K c 3 .� L- N rn v c c s fi 3 •�c-�� LLI E ad om U n'• 2 a 3J rn di oy, a � o°y' o � ` i 2 3 2 to � to � N � � L .� ,] ,] � n j uj % G.I U v] 4j c U F J F 0 0 z C T y Y o ' p o r G a l`r T y G S 0 v ° ti t ti t ry t� r rtz t; t t", t u v v c --d M --d 4J�--d &S M -d M E E E E E E E E E E E °.f <<< G G G G <<< G 00 C 0 0 0 C O 0 0 0 0 C C 0 0 0 0 0 0 C C O 0 0 O c 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 F 0 0 o c o 0 0 0 0 0 � 0 0 N c r v> vi vi to to vi to vt rn o0 0 O O 0 0 in M 0 0 in f/1 0 0 O M O 0 fn 0 0 d1 fn 0 0 to O O N N 00 O O � } 0 to 0 0 di to 0 0 fA bl 0 0 O en O O fn O O M N O O fn O O N O } O O v, 0 t� 0 0 O N O O 0 0 O O O O O C 0 0 fA C O O 0 N3 0 0 M to 0 0 O O O O O O C to O C EA M O H O N1 H } Iz. 0 W 0 0 O O C O O O 0 0 2-22 O C 0 0 O 9882. O O O O C O O O O O O O d1 O O O O � Gr 0 - v E 09 n O zs 3 E E 9 09 °•e a` U m E O S 2 E m ca ' cEo c. Y 3 3 a E cn c o t l ❑ v: in S Z Z E W£ in z F \ # 3 W z 2k� \\/ \/\ !! £ z z z z z 2 4 f 2 E ( ) / \ \ k\ \ \\\ o"I o ± > O'l & A & ¥ � § § } / 9 / \/\ ¥ �E� k)\ ){)))3)]\/k / /\ /\) § }f{){){®\(\ / Ee E/( §: k`52§e:e§2;ƒ E {®§f§frim#!{k +-zlzlz.22�� t �,o c - J e/E;eAE/a«±3 )0 5); ;IF - W k ( � � ) E Pt Z Z > 7! ] !! ) § \} \ \ §I a!4 & ! ■« § ;sE R !! ! $< # !!!K4 --- ----- ---- ----- ---- $ i ---- ----- ## # # # ## I \ #f ! E _ �1Z 5 S e gEE C Eg i J & U E »t. so �e �a3 z a - e 'E ,; 'E 'E E EG W Y E U b Q germ :i�X G � c � R R F- _ _ S [QQa7 Jpp Ci V - - 8 E Q� S pR S 5G�� S, pri S 25 55-�� S o r yy q 25 X qq E �« `�.•' � QQ E w www w w www w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w g IR W w u' h1u y u u - o - o y M r'' u v ` °e u'. F - �5 E - _U.U. u y u e n 2 41 j E F - y. YY n RP EE yy yy yy ;3 3 '54 b Q r Q J B i :i r� � i' i i =4 i S € C` 0 o fi t'. .j Q E � � I - � � E y E 9 E r Q MW a M N T } T } Z Z Y c 5 a 2 2 F F 4 F c E ' S e ' = o❑ e - e S a�a 8 8 12 �a 8 8 €8 g 88�a8 88 8 Z p 2 L q 2 Vl C U a:aU — — E ECt E E E E _ v_ _ v 5 t - - 9 1.9-r Z8 a M N E La L r. j i� F ti II, F LL S 8 8 - Ci E F r� � � e x 8 _ _ - R C7 s -<s. sx $S Q s s 62 62 �� a E E g u gu E - �� aa�a> a a } / ' } !!! a � � • ) \ §§§ !� } � % \! r . � . ;! ! \ \ ■ - � # # ## # # § - : !!■ ! »! r! \Beef !! ! @ # \ ; ! / ))u ) { ; \2: ®®k M M N N N �o C, N OO M 07 7 V) 6"3 69 N N O O O O O O O O N^ '7 V1 t- �-- t- O O O O It O O l� R b •-- ^ N M O O N M 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 o 0 C CD C N^ V' �o V 00 vl o V1 N �O 0 M 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O N 0 0— %G M I` O b O O tfj O 0o O 10 �o tn" N V) M v1 O O O b O O o0 O� 7 N O M M C, V1 t- O �o V1 V1 V1 I` V' t-- V1 I` C, V1 ^ 01 O V) �o M ^_ C\ M N 69 v) Vj O 10 O v- O O V1 �o R' US M ff- 69 oq N I` 00 O O : 00 Vl t-.- .-- M o9 t- r- 69 <t 00 •--� O O 69 N 69 b9 ^ 69 to 69 0 o O .M^ o 69 0 0 00 0 69 69 O O M F 00 69 69 69 to - 6�9 Vl O Vl 6�9 O 569 69 669 G, V1 N N M O I` En Vl �o O o\ 7 V vl N O N oN O to O E9 — ff3 66 9 669 669 66s 6�9 69 tai) 69 fn O 'o O O O O O O O O O O O O O O M O O O O O O O O ON V) 69 00 1 O O us 69 O O O O Vf O O V9 69 69 O Ci O C O C 0% I` 69 69 O O 69 O O V) 69 69 to O� 7 N M M O O 't to O O O O 69 O V1 69 E9 69 O O V1 r C\ V1 M EA 00 C, Cl 0 0 O O 0 0^ C\ th b O cD N O 0 O M N lq V' Ci M O In .�-i r- V) O O w N N vl t- t` Vl E1 ^ M M 7 O M n ^ N O� M ^ N 00 N 7 O N 69 69 69 69 69 69 69 ON 69 m v) 69 69 69 M Yi O N 6q C\ M M lc O 0 It 69 r- 00 N N O 0 O 0 cN c t+1 b C\ .-• O O N N O kn Vl t - O1 • V V wON cl t r V1 Sr. r V t- ^ Ci O t- 69 69 Gs 69 .-- 69 69 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Do 0 0 0 0 Cl CT O o O O O o O O r 69 O O O O &I EA 0 C 0 O 0 O 0 O 69 N to 69 0 C 0 O 0 O 69 ut C\ 69 69 O O O O O O 69 O O 69 00 V1 M N O vl O to O O O O O O O V1 00 N O O v) n O M I` C� O V1 O O vi O O O � b M N — N ai ¢ M O v) V1 C� I` cl ' — O I` N O N 69 en Ef) 69 69 Gn d 69 69 69 A N 601) V 69 L kn 69 h QN d O O T 2 ce 'd v Gam„ w Z .E c r O EA m 10 0 O 0 69 0 69 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 Ni w CT 0 &) 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O V' V- 0 69 0 Ef3 0 E s 0 O 7 n 0 O 0 O 0 69 00 l� O O O O O v) O O O O O O DD O O N N ^ O O O O Vl 10 Vl Cl^ vl l� O 10 O O 00 Vi N N vl O O O l% C� l% C\ C\ N o0 [% O O\ n E9 g n V1 N — O O N 00 7 N O N Hi Gn M 69 — 69 6A �o N3 N Efi M 66 N 69 00 V) -� 69 Vi EA � 7 W O00 69 \CO O t- o0 0 69 0 69 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O t, O Vl r m M V N o O 0 O CN r O EA O Is O O Cl O I` N O O O 69 O 69 th O n O— O O O O%C N Vl Oo O O t% O O O O O — O N O O O O vl O N Vi N O vl vl O I` O 00 N G N Vl M ' N O O O D vl ^ N O t-- M M 07 w G1 r 00 O ^ M '7 h 69 vl .-• ut o0 O 00 N to N N— M N— I` M N N M I` 69 V1 O N Hi H3 ^+ E9 fff E/i — EA 69 69 69 69 N bA 69 00 N3 w N 0 07 0 0 0 0 0 0 CN �c �o ^ h^ N O O O O M O O l� 00 c- — 69 O o^ M O O &I O o O O O O EA Cl v �C oo N cl �D Cl O v, N Iq Vl Mi O C O O Efi N 69 O -- N N M O '7 O In Vi vl O O M In Vl N to 00 - G1 00 O O O V to — vl N O vl v) N 00 O o 00 V1 O VI N Vl r- V t- In -' lll� n n. � C'i 6q 69 N � C\ t-- �� W 1, O N ^ 69 EA O M M 69 N 69 00 Ni M M V1 to 69 69 Efi 69 69 w v nc C � u 3 W G U 7 N V a 2 w E o � to E V 9 W y V ttl CA W c C o !] E CL o c c x -o `y w aci W U ti> X 0 m W c w N d o W e H v u .7 o aEi b Z a W �- m 2to o u^ d> o o m o E a z v'., cn ti °? • 5 E o y a U c E c 9 + y a y V o E ai C2 n V z a cc 7 W ._. V ca _� C 0 y _ C E N r A 00 c '� m o F.,, Q ti o d c 3 a u7„ 0 ti ti Q H > r D m a> o° w y E A a g 02 a a o CC Q d m m m U 0 w W W W C7 fi F 3 0 In F O > 3 F- M M N N N �o C, N OO M 07 7 V) 6"3 69 00 Vl O O n F O O 7 :; C\ M O O O C, C^ 7 0 0 0 0 00 C\ �o to C\ b O Vl 00 0 O Vi N D\ M^ N N �C O 07 M O N O b 15 O V3 Vf 69 Efi ffj M 69 us OO O O O O O 69 O O M M O O O O O O M M O V1 O O O Vi O O N N O O O O O O N N t� M I Vl oo -11' O O O O N O O O\ o0 eq cDN N — o9 t- r- 69 r- 00 69 Efi 69 N 69 b9 ^ 69 to 69 0 o O O o 00 0 0 00 0 O O O O O O O O O O 00 O O O O 'o cl to - Vl O Vl Vn O O O O G, V1 N N M O I` oo 7 Vl �o O o\ 7 V vl N O N oN O to O E9 — ff3 66 9 669 669 66s 6�9 69 tai) 69 r 69 O O O O O 'o O O N o0 OO O O O o O c O 0^ N O 0 O 0 r - O\ to V) to O O (D O O 06 M N M I- fel O V1 oo O C' oo V1 H) c\ N N C\ M V1 N 't to 69 69 69 E9 69 69 EA M EA �O 69 0 cD 0 0 0 0 0 0^ C\ O O O cD O 0 N vl O In O r- to O O w O Ng N 7 Vn t` Vl E1 ^ M Vl M 7 O M n ^ N O� 69 V4 69 69 69 69 69 69 M 69 ON 69 m v) O O o0 M O O N C\ M M lc O 0 O C r- 00 N N O 0 O 0 cN c t+1 b C\ .-• O O N N O kn Vl t - O1 • V V wON cl t r V1 7 r V t- ^ Ci O t- 69 69 Gs 69 .-- 69 69 69 E!i 69 `o t V L V3y O V d 7 c � E U ai ¢ oo. � en e d A V L C h QN d O O T 2 ce 'd v Gam„ Z .E c r x x c o c o E m o E o U W w 3 a E'n En lw F F M M N N N �o C, N OO M 07 7 V) 6"3 69 C� N 'man � 3 CCs ; ' a 0 o to � U o a O O f,. 03 Ocn bo . --I-I E- c O to Y aM� .O U N L7 a a0 C6 m ca O V n U C:) ab N C's 0 3 �' 0 a y� U CS � En ° CCs 0 C-) (, O O N o j ° y ct O o -0 v lz `Wa H U F a .E o .a Cr ti ° F" O r. o c U 04 04 Lr yy O 4. 0.) O F >,C4 0 N N bb O CLI d •pppO"��� N O O 7 qO 3 M N N (O N O N (Mp pO N "' cc (lyyV t2�� (Oy� aa yN �Oy �NNy_ O�l O O Q 0 fpm O O N �S O ^ O in ce ca N N ry '• n N O L 69 h W 0 11111 Hill 11111 tS W`- d o o �o $ �i m �v c o co i0 m (CR� (by N boy Cm pip c'ra •'"' q a n a) W CL E �� Q o w C m C m J J J J m J N J N J N J N J -If J N J N J N J N J N J N O LL.E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E �9?z9.€.9 €99 9 � o Z9 v e Jsr v Jer Q ` J J J .O0�7 c C pCp C Cm C C Q= CC mC yCy mC yCy N C N N N N N A 2 iy - _--- Z$ 2 2 2 2 Z y S c o = dr V d CL � W w _ _ m _ O 0 w = a o (i1 N Q L M a 4 5 Q a o{ w ao o m a)a c c N w N $' Q -05<p 1C14 �$mp 3 Q Q Q Q O 1A O 10 N O c N Q E E y y m m pg11 C� �- a Qa � QQQamm v�aQQa LA Z P w a a 0 a M 5�i fN U 0 Q q �s 2 N v^ 9 oNo o 0 N N bb O CLI 0 ^L— CL f� E 0- E CU U 0 cu E E r� c# LO R b w U kn N 0 00 Q 00 NNk Mcl S Q cn m N N N tri in aS a0 tq kRf to fn » N o e o gw o cm co r.- N N 4 r m n8 NN !S O ill N Wi N w kd c CSO N N eA aD fv �N N n r M f f 4m ^ W) co, fD to C3 S p g M N Q O O le t0 -tr to tp� O n O m pp K N sn Capp og o ��9f �y lV N f0 1p iY 01 ( 1t7 f -, co to w. en �o�� 00'e "$ 0 0 0 0 5� 5� Q o 1 so ra r v � � o aoo ey Im �� k rQ N �i Ca �i ko m Y b p Qf W icy C7 0 inN Of k4 oO r- of cv aD N Y!•" O C7 C7 Ip W ap N f u3 N kD tel' N tZ t+f M V2 (((��� O O 140 o g p 6 0 0 0 O C O O 1 O O O o O N IL f Q tatca cc -q OR tl'I ccyiea n' sob ui 9 i c Gl Gi ( o C a0 N .- h O Iti kA t6 Q� k7 �f v T fA i N RO q N A ri tV CO , i e pf f,f O m .� 'n O c N C �0 r0 ea u b r y C m n c E a u a It n OA as a �p v 1 .Z _� a� �n'ccI q x �� E a1 O tp o H z a► 06o c ►O.1 m C .c tCY co► aei k a in m _ as C n a 3 d)in Y E -9 ti '' ti ?m mEg� 2a d m E P m fjj W a C V o tll tii E 3 C? o tj'tij r? .. N a t' v .H 0�C � ,� Sc qQ" qtt I'lc�c3 `z � O 6x xRifa: i out a �i�x$a N C �. R b w U kn N 0 00 Q 00 �k � � _ \ # # k(k o e 2 Sis q���F��2 § § (qr e§ &w V. - § (§ k � k cn k § 2 2(§ \d 0 o m o(>_ � � � L. 0 I ; � � _ \ A .9 on Alt 0 r0 r p t4�gy7�j y � 1,12 Ifle ✓1pO OO pO � 5g O IR c .. n. io Id of 03 iO a �i vOi vii a, O H O rM-r � mo Q O ry O O rn n !� Q VOi 0 c 06 N 16 O ni m o ra M m c' O 03 C `? O O r ni M N o 1 0 �O C u Inl g M ST ^S. N OWY M O O .`'o'1 VJ .Qi3.r Vr1 M VJ CJ O nl O 9 �r u !-i {Z' CSI �PF^�+Gyi .n M q H K h O O� b C) W N �J O M Off+ O m T M N1 bi pO p O O O Vti ,'�"rr O O O O K POO v1 .Ni O O O h N N h O N n O O S O O h'f M vl O! O M7 A I Vi fR �t N N y O h O « M M (e� 44 r„ ni r' O r�pp ni o ni a o r� pp p p vV��% o Gil ~R �, �. 1�0 �• V � � � �rryy'M^^ M O O O O M � .n+1� O O 4 "i ;�OO„i �n��! v V1 O rt q O O M 0 O O O M b m M ti NJ r� O q N O b -0 b D O O N O I c? o— Q o N O O N K O r M O M 'y O •`i f9 W Q 9 in of r L # Q � d h0 n rn oA o JX'e I ryON�jC H W W W vet U r� C.) rG f-+ I� Q 0.�iC O' .9 Local 1.50 Mill Expenditure For Maintenance, Repair and Renovation Anticipated expenditures expected from local funding s=oes over the years covered by the current worts plan. Item 2019-2020 Actual Budget 2020-2021 Projected 2021-2022 Projected 2022-2023 Projected 2023 -2024 Projected Total Remaining MaN and Repair from IS Mills 55 879A46 $9,575,816 $10,337.988 $9,117,345 S13,483,625 $48,394220 MaintenancpJRepair Salaries $3,343,645 33,5013,000 $3,500,000 $3,5,00,000 63,51)[3,000 $17,343,545 School Bus Purchases 311,050,600 $1,050,000 S1,050,000 $1,050,000 $1,050,000 $5,250,000 Other Vehicle Purctases 5100,000 S200,000 so $200,000 $0 3500,000 Capital Outlay Eqafipment so so so so -$0 $0 RentfLease Payments $0 so so $o $0 COP Debt Service $1 0,070,590 $10,063,80 $10,065,090 5110,068,090 310,062,250 $50,329,860 Rent/Lease Relocatables 5490,000 S4013,0130 $400,000 $400,000 $400,000 $2,000,000 Environmental Probtents $0 so $o so $0 $o s_1011.14 Debt Seribce so so $o so $0 $0 Special Facirdres UnstrucUon Accmull $0 so so $o $0 $0 Premiums for Property C2%mlltj Insurance -1011.71 (4a,:b) $1,211,991 $o so so $o $1,211,991 Ouarffied School Construction Bonds CPSM) S1,300,125 $1,300,125 $1,300,125 $1,300,125 $1,300,125 $6,500,625 Quarified Zone Academy Bonds (OZAB) so so so so $0 $o State Charter School Cap'W Outlay $1214,934 31,880,460 $1,880,460 $1 j880,460 31,880,460 58,736,774 Impact Fees 'RESTFUCTED RINDS FOR FUnJRE CAPACITY PRODUCING PROJECT DUE TO GROWTH' 31.700,000 51,300,000 $1,300,000 $1,300,000 31,3130,000 $6,900,000 Performance Contracting; Debt Service S891,287 so $o so $0 $891,287 Local Expendiilm Totals: $27,162.018 329,270,241 1 $29,833,6631 $28,816,0201 S32,976,460 1 $148,058,402 Revenue 1.60 Mill Revenue Source Schedule of Estimated Capital Ougay Revwue from each currently approved smrrce vAtich is estimated to be available for expenditures on the projects included in the tentative district ladUes zwk pFogm. All amounts are NET'atter owsidering carrywer balances, interest earned., new COP's, 1011-14 and 1011.15 :loans, etc- Districts cannot use 1.5 -UM ftwuls, err salaries except for those explicitly associated with maintenancefrepair projects- (1011.71 (5), F.S-) Community Development Department Adopted December , 2019, Ordinance 2019_ Page D-2 244 Hem Fuad 2019-2020 2020-2021 2021-2022 2022 - 2023 2023-2024 Total PECO Non ConstrucfKm 340 Actual Value Projected Projected Projected Projected so (1) Non-exempt property 360 $19;910,506,448 520,919;100,000 S21,879,900,000 $22,892,700,000 $23,909;000,000 $109,5111,206,448 assessed valuation $0 $306,030 $306,030 $34030 $306,030 $1,224,12(1 (2) The Minege projected for 360 1;50 150 1.50 1.50 1.S0 $59,195 discretionary capdal ou>tPay per s_1011.71 $136,051 $133,051 $135,031 $135y051 $135,051 $675255 (3) Fun value of the 5 -W -M21 $33;449,651 $35,,144;066 535,758= 536,459,736 $40,167,120 $163,978,827 discretionary ca" outFay per x_1011.71 (4) Varue of the portion of the 1:50 370 52x;671,129 &30;123,504 $31,507,056 532,96.5,488 $34,428,M $157,695,137 Will ACTUALLY levied (5) Difference of ftm (3) and (4), $4.778,522 ss O'2D„564 S5,251,176 $5,494,248 $5,738,160 $26,282,690 PECO Revenue Source The figure In the rav deskna`y-d "PECO r42Mtenance^ who be subtracted from funds available for new construction because PECO maintenance dollars cannot be used for new construction - Item Fund 2019 - 2020 Actual Budge, 2020-2021 Projected 2021-2022 Projected 2022-2023 Projected 2023-2024 Projected Total PECO Non ConstrucfKm 340 3u $0 $0 $0 so so PECO Maintenance Expernditures 360 Su $306,030 $306,030 $305,030 $305,030 $1,224,1120 Diistrtrted $0 $306,030 $306,030 $34030 $306,030 $1,224,12(1 CO & DS Revenue Source Revenue from CapiM Oerti I and Debt Semrrce funds. Item Fund 2019-2020 2M - 2024 2021-2022 2022-2023 2023-2024 Total Actual6udget Projected iProjected Projected Projected CO & DS Cash Flan -Rough 360 $123,212 $123212 $123,212 $123,212 $123,212 $616AW Diistrtrted CO F IDS Interest on 360 $11,$39 $11,t13L $11;639 $11,839 S11,M $59,195 Undistributed CO $136,051 $133,051 $135,031 $135y051 $135,051 $675255 Community Development Department Adopted December , 2019, Ordinance 2019= Page D-3 245 Fair Share Revenue Source All legally bindit commitments for proportionate fair share ncifrgation for impacts on public school fadlifies roust be included in the 5 -year district work progranb Nothing reported for this section. Sales Surtax Referendum Specific urinal- tcl about any referendum four a 1 -cent or' Cent surtax referendum during the previous year_ Did the school district hold a surtax referendum during the past fiscal year 2018 - 2019? No Additional Revenue Source Awl additional revenue sources Vein 2019-2020 Actual Value. 2020-2021 Projected 2021 -2022 Projected 2022-2023 Projected 2023-2024, Projected Total Proceeds from a s-101 11-1415 F -S_ 'Loans so $ri so $0 so � Distrix$ Bonds -Voted local bond referendum proceeds per s_9, Art VM State Constitution se so $0 $0 so so Promds frorn Specoall Arta Bonds so $0 so sm Estmaled Re we from, C® & DS ®crowd Sade so $0 $0 $0! so � Proceeds ftn Voted Capilal lmrp asemoerds mniDlage so so $0 so so s0 Other Remove for Others Capitatl ejects so $0 $0 $01 so Sul Prods from 19 cent sales surtax autticriced Dig will board so $0 $0 $0 so sa Pow ftmra local gammmental infrastnretwe sates surtax s0 $o $o $0, s0 so Pmceeftfmm'nCertificatesol PatudPation (woos) We 90 $0 $0 so s0 $0 Classrooms First Hand picoeeds amount authorized in FY 1297--% s0 $0 $0 $0, so so Classrooms for las so $0 $0 $0 So SD DisWctEquity RecAgnffan s0 $0 $0 $0 so so Federal Grants sot $0 $0 $0 $o so Proportionate share mitigation (actual . cash revenue cno j, not in hind donabiorwq so $0 $0 $0 so so Impact fees reused $1,3430,II0 $1,300,000 $1,300,1000 '$1,300,000 $1,3DD,ow $6,9MAM Private donations $ID $0 so $0 So sD Community Development Department Adopted December , 2019, Ordinance 2019_ Page D-4 246 Grants fam beag qxvemments or not .for- SO $0 $0 $0 so so profit d ni aliions Budget Projected :Projected Projected Projected $675,255 Gnkwest, blcArutmg PreftOn Investment $16,124 $16,125 $16,125 $16,125 $16,125 $60624 Revelry from Bonds pledging proceeds so $0 $0 $0 S0 10 torn 9 cent or W cent Sales Surtax (SN'162,018) ($29,WO.241) ($29;833,663) ($26,616:0201 (S3Z,976,,460) (ST43. MMM) ToM turd Balance Carried Forward so $700;000 $0 S6,00)[M so $6„7MOM General Ca3xW Ouitay Obtrguaed Ftmd S9 $0 $0 $0 $0 So Balance Canned Formard From Total $1,5+39,111 $853,263 '$1,673,393 '54,149,468 $1,452,544 $91637,735 Frmd Ball rrce Canoed Forward SIS Faulffes ConstrucEDn AODCW, $1,214,934 $432;756 $432;756 $432,756 $432,756 W-94!5558 Ore Ceffrt - W Cemt Sales Surtax Debt S+0 $0 $0 $0 so so Service From ToM Fund Balance Carried Fomhard Cap W Outlay Prok4ls Fri (Balance $o $0 $0 $0 $o so Carried Fdrawd Fu mn Total Fund Bakuoa� Camri�ed Fortr,2rd 5ubtfltal $2,931,458 $2,445,881 $1,748,6$1 $7,748,881 $1,746„881 $16,6iS M Total Revenue Summary Vern Name 2019-2020 2020-2021 2021 - 2022 2022-2023 2023-2024 Fite Year Total CO $ DS Reverme Budget Projected :Projected Projected Projected $675,255 Local 1-5'(:«4311 N3 nary Capr3al Outlay $28,671,129 $30,123,504 531,507,055 S32,M,488 $34,428,-%0 $1157„646,137 Rem $2„931,00 $2,448,881 $1,746,881 57,748,881 $1,748,Seti $16,621.6e562 PECO and 1510 IMain1 and Other 15 (SN'162,018) ($29,WO.241) ($29;833,663) ($26,616:0201 (S3Z,976,,460) (ST43. MMM) PaL11 Expernditmres $3,437,195 $3,557,325 $12,033,400 $3,336,432 $25,939,572 -- - - - - - - -- --- -- l PECO t.4abrlerrance Revenue S0 $306;030 $306,030 330&,030 $3136,001) $1„224,1M Avaikole 1-W hUdI forNew $1,5+39,111 $853,263 '$1,673,393 '54,149,468 $1,452,544 $91637,735 Consuucllon Kern Name 2019 - 20211 Budget 2020-2021 Projected 2021-2022 Projected 2022-2023 Projected 2023-2024 Projected Five. Year Total CO $ DS Reverme $135,0151 $135.051 $135,051 $135,051 $135,051. $675,255 PECO Mmu Construrdmn Revenue S0 $0 $0 $0 9D so OtherfAddi ai Revenue $2„931,00 $2,448,881 $1,746,881 57,748,881 $1,748,Seti $16,621.6e562 TotalAddidonal Revenue $3,06&143 $2,583,'932 51,883,932 $7;683,932 SIM3,932 $17.301437 Total Available Revenue$4,575,220 $3,437,195 $3,557,325 $12,033,400 $3,336,432 $25,939,572 -- - - - - - - -- --- -- l Community Development Department Adopted December , 2019, Ordinance 2019= Page D-5 247 Indian River County 2030 Comprehensive Plan Indian River County Community Development Department Supplement #_; Adopted December 2019, Ordinance 2019 - Attachment 3. 248 TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Figures .................................................................................................................................... ... as Listof Tables........................................................................................................:......:......................... iii Introduction............................................................................................................................................ l ExistingConditions................................................................................................................................2 FinancialResources........................................................................................................................... 2 Expenditures....................................................................................................................................19 ExistingOutstanding Debt...............................................................................................................22 Local Policies and Practices............................................................................................................23 Analysis................................................................................................................................................ 27 Analysis of the Timing and Location of Capital Improvements......................................................27 NeedsAssessment............................................................................................................................32 FiscalAssessment............................................................................................................................34 Fiscal Assessment Summary...........................................................................................................39 Concurrency Management Plan.......................................................................................................... 40 ProjectApplicability........................................................................................................................40 ServiceStandards.............................................................................................................................40 Demand............................................................................................................................................ 42 Availabilityof Capacity...................................................................................................................43 Regulation........................................................................................................................................ 46 MonitoringSystem..........................................................................................................................46 Applicability....................................................................................................................................48 Goal, Objectives and Policies.............................................................................................................. 49 Implementation, Evaluation, and Monitoring...................................................................................... 58 Implementation................................................................................................................................ 58 Evaluation and Monitoring Procedures...........................................................................................60 APPENDIXA: Five Year Schedule of Capital Improvements.............................................................. A APPENDIX B: 2040 Roadway Improvement Plan............................................................................... B APPENDIX C: School District of Indian River County Capital Improvements Schedule .................... C APPENDIX D: School District of Indian River County Summary of Estimated Revenue .................... D Community Development Department Adopted December 2019, Ordinance 2019-_ Indian River County 249 Figure Title Figure 6.1 Ad Valorem Taxes (Property Taxes)......................................................... Figure 6.2 Enterprise Funds...............................................................: . ....................... Figure 6.3 User Fees and Charges .................................................. ........................... Figure 6.4 Special Assessments.................................................................................. Figure6.5 Impact Fees............................................................................................... Figure 6.6 Local Discretionary Sales Surtax...................................:......................... Figure 6.7 Tourist Development Tax.......................................................................... Figure 6.8 Local Option Fuel Tax.............................................................................. Figure 6.9 Franchise Fee/Tax.................................................................................... Figure 6.10 Local Government Half -Cent Sales Tax ................................................. Figure 6.11 County Revenue Sharing......................................................................... Figure 6.12 Constitutional Fuel Tax.......................................................................... Figure6:13 County Fuel Tax...................................................................................... Figure 6.14 Alcoholic Beverage License Tax............................................................. Figure 6.15 Mobile Home License Tax....................................................................... Figure 6.17 General Government Expenditures by Function .................................... TS------ f 10 T'--,- --- ^----'`--I T---------------`- T'------- 7z. Page ..... 3 .3 .4 .4 .5 .6 .7 .9 10 13 14 154-4 ... 15 16 16 20 35 Indian River County 250 Table Title Page Table 6.1: Indian River County Revenue Sources (FY 2017/18) ................................................... 2 Table 6.2: Optional Tourist Taxes on Transient Rental Facilities ................................................. 8 Table 6.3: Local Fuel Tax Rates.................................................................................................. 10 Table 6.4: Indian River County General Revenues By Source ..................................................... 18 Table 6.5: Indian River County General Government Expenditures By Function ....................... 19 Table 6.6: Indian River County Existing Long Term Debt........................................................... 23 Table 6.7: Overall General Revenue Projection Summary.......................................................... 29 Table 6.8: Earmarked Projected Revenue by Comprehensive Plan Element ............................... 30 Table 6.9: Indian River County Tax Base and Millage Projections ............................................. 31 Table 6.10: Future Capital Improvement Expenditures for Indian River County &.................... 32 Table 6.11: Indian River County Overall General Expenditures Projection Summary ............... 35 Table 6.12: Projected Expenses for Water, Sewer, and Solid Waste ........................................... 36 Table 6.13: Indian River County Overall Operating Cost Projections ........................................ 36 Table 6.14: Indian River County Estimated Ability to Raise Bonds Without A Public Vote........ 37 Table 6.15 Indian River County Bond Schedule.............................................................:..... 38 Table 6.16: Service Level Measures for Concurrency Related Facilities .................................... 41 Table 6.17: Monitoring System Design........................................................................................ 47 Table 6.18: Monitoring System Tasks........................................................................................... 47 Table 6.19: Capital Improvement Element Implementation Matrix ............................................. 58 Table 6.20: Capital Improvements Element Evaluation Matrix ................................................... 61 Community Development Department Adopted December . , 2019, Ordinance 2019 - Indian River County 251 252 The Capital Improvements Element (CIE) summarizes the needed capital facilities identified in the county's comprehensive plan and describes the financial means by which identified needed facilities are to be funded. The CIE also demonstrates the economic feasibility of the entire comprehensive plan and prioritizes the funding of all the public facilities identified in the county's comprehensive plan based on the level of need and the availability of funds. For purposes of this element, a capital improvement is a substantial facility (land, building, or major equipment) that costs at least $100,000 and which is required to maintain adopted level -of -service standards or to meet objectives identified in the county's comprehensive plan. Included in the CIE are an existing conditions section, an analysis section, a concurrency management section, a goals, objectives, and policies section, and an implementation section. While financial resources and existing local policies and practices are discussed in the existing conditions section, the fiscal condition of both the county and its comprehensive plan, as well as other issues concerning capital improvement projects, are assessed in the analysis section of this element. In the concurrency management section, the administrative framework for maintaining public facility service levels is addressed while the county's overall capital improvements strategy is discussed in the goals, objectives and policies section. Finally, a 5 -Year Schedule of Capital Improvements, as well as monitoring and evaluation programs, can be found in the implementation section of this element. 253 Existing Conditions Financial Resources One of the chief functions of the Capital Improvements Element is to inventory the major sources of revenue available to the county. Those revenue sources determine the county's capability to fund needed capital improvements. Table 6.1 lists the county's local, state, and federal revenue sources and indicates the amount of revenue collected from each source during FY i^t�TFY 2017/18. Table 6.1 also shows the percentage distribution of total revenue received by Indian River County for each of the revenue sources. Table 6.1: Indian River County Revenue Sources (FY 2016/17) (FY 2017/181 Federal Sources State Sources Local Sources Amount % of Total Amount % of Total Amount % of Total ($1,000) Revenue ($1,000) Revenue ($1,000) Revenue Various Grants $9,724 $8;939 3.57% 3.6894 Local Government Half -Cent Sales Tax 9 908 &9;43 3.63% 3.99% Ad Valorem Taxes $98,639 $90,192 36.17% 2' Total Federal $9,72 $8;939 3.57% X689,; County Revenue Sharing 3 797 $3691 1.39% ° 1.490% Enterprise Funds $56.327 20.65% 21.77% Constitutional Fuel Tax $1,853$1,814 0.68% User Fees and Charges 17133 :7 6.28% 6-Fi�96 818 $893 0.30% JL46 $562 0.20% County Fuel Tax " Special Assessments nn�zoi Alcoholic Beverage License Tax 69 $66 0.03% 983% Impact Fees J2.145 $3, 94 2.66% 233016 Distribution of J447 $447 0.16% $18,708 6.86% Sales and Use 048% Local Discretionary $1:7,624 7.2, - :0 Taxes to Counties Sales Surtax 106 $193 0.04% 13_0 2 5 &41, 8 1.11% Mobile Home Tourist Development 1_169,; License Tax Tax $7,620 $4$38 2.79% 13_830 $3,� 1.40% Various Grants 2:000% Local Option Fuel ,�, oio Tax Total State $24,618 $21,403 9.03% 8.70; Franchise Tax $9.448 $9 139 3.46% Wig; 3 903 $2;223 1.43% Interest Income 9-94% 19 566 7.17% Other 4� $238,370 87.41% Total Local $21�z gra; $272,712 100.00% Total All Sources $242,344 }66;60°/, 254 Local Sources Local sources consist of revenues that are levied, collected and disbursed at the local level solely at the discretion of Indian River County. Those local sources are shown in table 6. 1, and are described in further detail below. • Ad Valorem Taxes (Property Taxes) Ad Valorem taxes are taxes levied on the assessed value (net of any exemptions) of real and personal property. This tax is commonly referred to as "property tax." Ad valorem taxes are generally assessed in mills; that is, thousandths of a dollar of assessed value. The state mandated millage cap is 10 mills per local government, excluding voted millages. In �'�"�17FY 2017/18, Indian River County imposed an aggregate millage rate of 5.83495.9901. According to County policy, ad valorem taxes may be used for both operating and capital project expenditures. Table 6.1 shows that, in €Y2016/17FY 2017/18,. Indian River County collected a proximatel enn , 92 00CIOR 639 in ad Figure 6.1: Ad Valorem Tax Revenue by FY $120,000 ---- $100,000 �� $90,192 $84,714 $80,000 $72,716 $76,634 f $60,000 $40,000 Tai $20,000 $o 12/13 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 ® Revenue (in thousands) Source: I nd ian River County Finance Department p Y �� valorem taxes. In FY 2414/4-7FY 2017/1.8, ad valorem taxes represented x°,;36.17% -of all revenues collected by Indian River County. Figure 6.1 displays the ad valorem tax revenue collected by Indian River County over the last six fiscal years. As shown, ad valorem tax revenue 'm'^ id in 2012,113, and -has increased each year since -4ienFY 2012/13. The increase relates to a continually improving housing and property market. • Enterprise Funds Within governmental entities, there are often various departments that provide goods and services to the public in a manner similar to the private sector. Such departments, classed under the general title "enterprise funds," must raise revenues from outside the 255 Figure 6.2: Enterprise Fund Reserve by FY $601000- 60,000-$50,000 $50,000 $40,000 $30,000- 30,000-$20000 $20000-1 $10,000 - $o , 12/13 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 01 Revenue(in thousands) Source: Indian River County Finance Department 255 Table 6.1 shows that enterprise fund revenue represented 21.77-0,;20.65% of Indian River County's total funds for F�"�TFY 2017/18. Figure 6.2 displays the enterprise fund revenue collected by Indian River County over the last six fiscal years. During that time period, enterprise fund revenue increased 2229:05%. • User Fees and Charges User fees and charges represent revenue received by the county for providing various general services. Those fees and charges are necessary because taxes alone cannot totally keep up with the increasing costs of services. This category includes fees collected by the Tax Collector's Office, the Clerk of the Circuit Court, the Property Appraiser's Office, the Sheriff's Department, and the Recreation and Parks Department. This category also includes other miscellaneous user fees charged by the county for general services not financed by other fund sources. In �'�'�FY 2017/18 user fees and charges represented Figure 6.3: User Fees and Charges by FY 12/13 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 C3 Revenue (in thousands) Source: Indian River County Finance Department 0e6.28% of all funds collected by Indian River County. Figure 6.3 displays user fees and charges collected by Indian River County over the last six fiscal years. During that time period, revenue from user fees and charges varied, but overall increased 8.4 7.27%. • _ Special Assessments Special assessments are compulsory payments levied on real property for specific benefits -generated by public investments or services. By law, the assessment levied must fairly reflect the actual costs of the improvements. County revenues which fall under the general category of special assessments consist of street paving assessments, street lighting district assessments, as well as assessments for Figure 6.4: Special Assessments Revenue by FY $800 $700 $600 $536 $562 $546 $500 $481 $505 $400 $300 $200 $100 $- 12/13 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 0 Revenue (in thousands) Source: Indian River County Finance Department 256 water, sewer, and drainage improvements. Expenditures of special assessment revenue are restricted to public improvement projects that directly benefit the property owner or payee. For example, street paving assessment revenues must be spent on paving streets that directly benefit the payer of the assessment. Special Assessment revenue represented 0.23-0,;0.20% of county funds for FY ''�/17FY 2017/18. Figure 6.4 displays the revenue collected by Indian River County through special assessments over the last six fiscal years. During that time period, revenue from special assessments increased by 13.51%.. Impact Fees An impact fee is a one-time charge, fee, or assessment levied as a condition of subdivision or site plan approval, building permit issuance, or other development or construction approval when the revenues collected are intended to fund the costs of capital improvements for public facilities. Since 1986, Indian River County has levied traffic impact fees on new development projects. In June of 2005, Indian River County began to levy 8 new impact fees. At the same time, the County increased the existing traffic impact fee rates The nine im act fees include• I �I p traffic, emergency services, parks and recreation, public schools, solid waste, correctional facilities, law enforcement, libraries, and public buildings. On March 3, 2009, the Board of County Commissioners considered several alternatives to reduce impact fees for the purpose of stimulating economic development in the county. After discussion, the Board decided to suspend collection of five of the county's nine impact fees for six months. The five suspended impact fees were: emergency services, correctional facilities, public buildings, law enforcement, and solid waste. On September 22, 2009 and again on March 16, 2010, the Board of County Commissioners voted to further extend the suspension of the five impact fees. At its March 16, 2010 vote, the Board of County Commissioners extended the suspension of the five impact fees to March 31, 2011. On March 15; 2011 and again on March 13, 2012, the Board of County Commissioners re-evaluated the impact fee suspension and ultimately voted to continue suspending three of the five previously suspended impact fees. Those three fees were: public buildings, correctional facilities, and solid waste facilities. The March 13, 2012 vote of the Board of County Commissioners suspended the three fees until March 31, 2014. On March 11, 2014 the Board of County Commissioners voted to suspend the same three impact 257 Figure 6.5: Impact Fee Revenue by FY $8,000 $7,000 $6,000 $5,000 $4,000 $3,000 $2,000 $1,000 $- 12/ 13 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 ® Revenue (in thousands) Source: Indian River County Finance Department I �I p traffic, emergency services, parks and recreation, public schools, solid waste, correctional facilities, law enforcement, libraries, and public buildings. On March 3, 2009, the Board of County Commissioners considered several alternatives to reduce impact fees for the purpose of stimulating economic development in the county. After discussion, the Board decided to suspend collection of five of the county's nine impact fees for six months. The five suspended impact fees were: emergency services, correctional facilities, public buildings, law enforcement, and solid waste. On September 22, 2009 and again on March 16, 2010, the Board of County Commissioners voted to further extend the suspension of the five impact fees. At its March 16, 2010 vote, the Board of County Commissioners extended the suspension of the five impact fees to March 31, 2011. On March 15; 2011 and again on March 13, 2012, the Board of County Commissioners re-evaluated the impact fee suspension and ultimately voted to continue suspending three of the five previously suspended impact fees. Those three fees were: public buildings, correctional facilities, and solid waste facilities. The March 13, 2012 vote of the Board of County Commissioners suspended the three fees until March 31, 2014. On March 11, 2014 the Board of County Commissioners voted to suspend the same three impact 257 p traffic, emergency services, parks and recreation, public schools, solid waste, correctional facilities, law enforcement, libraries, and public buildings. On March 3, 2009, the Board of County Commissioners considered several alternatives to reduce impact fees for the purpose of stimulating economic development in the county. After discussion, the Board decided to suspend collection of five of the county's nine impact fees for six months. The five suspended impact fees were: emergency services, correctional facilities, public buildings, law enforcement, and solid waste. On September 22, 2009 and again on March 16, 2010, the Board of County Commissioners voted to further extend the suspension of the five impact fees. At its March 16, 2010 vote, the Board of County Commissioners extended the suspension of the five impact fees to March 31, 2011. On March 15; 2011 and again on March 13, 2012, the Board of County Commissioners re-evaluated the impact fee suspension and ultimately voted to continue suspending three of the five previously suspended impact fees. Those three fees were: public buildings, correctional facilities, and solid waste facilities. The March 13, 2012 vote of the Board of County Commissioners suspended the three fees until March 31, 2014. On March 11, 2014 the Board of County Commissioners voted to suspend the same three impact 257 fees until March 31, 2015 or until the County could complete its most recent impact fee review and adopt a new impact fee schedule. By early April 2014 the County had completed the nonresidential portion of its impact fee review and on April 22, 2014 the Board of County Commissioners adopted a revised reduced nonresidential impact fee schedule with an effective date of May 5, 2014. The residential impact fee review was completed in September of 2014 and a revised residential impact fee schedule was adopted by the Board of County Commissioners on October 14, 2014 with an effective date of February 2, 2015. For both the nonresidential impact fee schedule and the residential impact fee schedule the Board of County Commissioners voted to not collect the correctional facilities, solid waste facilities, and libraries impact fees at this time. Figure 6.5 shows that near4y-siK--more than seven* million dollars of impact fee revenue was collected in FY 2�1647FY 2017/18. This is nearly five ^;a A baa millie^six and a half million dollars more than what was collected in FY 2010/11. Impact fee revenues decreased during the Great Recession, gradually increased through FY 2015/16 and slightly decreased in FY 2016/17. During. the past six years revenue from impact fees have increased 125.35%. Local Discretionary Sales Surtax Pursuant to s. 212.055, F.S, local governments are authorized to levy numerous types of local discretionary sales surtaxes. Under the provisions of s. 212.054, F.S., the local discretionary sales surtaxes apply to all transactions subject to the state tax imposed on sales, use, services, rentals, admissions, and other authorized transactions. The surtax is computed by multiplying the rate imposed. by the county where the sale occurs by the amount of the taxable sale. This sales tax can be levied on most transactions under $5,000. According to state law, Indian River County is eligible to impose a Local Figure 6.6: Local Discretionary Sales Surtax by FY $20,000$18,7 08 $18,000 $16,000 $14,000 INS ON ON $12,000 $10,000 $8,000 $6,000 $4,000 $2,000 IN 1101 1101 ON $- 1011111�ON, 12/13 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 ® Revenue (in thousands) Source: Indian River County Finance Department Government Infrastructure Surtax of either 0.5% or 1.0%. Currently, Indian River County imposes the 1.0% Infrastructure Surtax. Procedurally, the Local Government Infrastructure Surtax must be enacted by a majority vote of the Board of County Commissioners and approved by voters in a countywide referendum. That surtax, which may be imposed for a maximum period of fifteen years, was imposed by Indian River County in April, 1989, and was renewed by voters in November, 2002 and again in November 2016. Generally, the proceeds must be expended to finance, plan, and construct infrastructure; to acquire land for public recreation or conservation or protection of natural resources; or to finance the closure of local government-owned solid waste landfills that are already closed or are required to close by order of the Department of Environmental Protection. Table 6:1 shows that local sales surtax revenue represented 7 6.86% of all funds collected by Indian River County in �'�"�FY 2017/18. Figure 6.6 displays the Local Discretionary Sales Surtax revenue received by Indian River County over the last six fiscal years. This local revenue source increased by 28.56-1,; 36.47% over that period. Distribution of surtax proceeds is based on the specifics of an interlocal agreement or through a formula based on population. In Indian River County, Local Infrastructure Surtax revenue is distributed to county government and municipal governments through a formula based on population. Currently, twenty-five of the sixty-seven Florida counties levy a Local Government Infrastructure Surtax. Within Indian River County's region, Martin and St. Lucie counties do not levy the surtax. While Okeechobee County is eligible to levy the infrastructure surtax, it instead levies a Small County Surtax of 1%. That is another local discretionary sales surtax. Tourist Development Tax Any county in the state may, subject to a vote of the citizenry, impose a Tourist Development Tax. The transient rental trade is the primary base for the levy of the tourist tax. Any lodging agreement for six months or less is subject to the tax. Generally, the tourist tax levy is one or two percent. Counties, however, may set an additional one percent above the original tax through an extraordinary vote of the governing board or by referendum. Further, if a professional sports franchise facility is located within a county, an additional one to two percent tourist tax may also be levied. The first one percent professional sports franchise Figure 6.7: Tourist Development Tax Revenue by FY $3,500 i $3,000 $2,500 $2,000 $1,500 - $1,000 $500 12/13 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 ® Revenue (in thousands) Source: Indian River County Finance Department facility tax may be authorized by a majority vote of the governing board of the county, while the second one percent tax must be authorized by a majority plus one vote of the governing board of the county. Currently, Indian River County imposes the original two percent tourist tax, the additional one percent tax, and an additional one percent professional sports franchise facility tax. Out of Florida's sixty-seven counties, sixty-three currently levy a tourist tax. Of those sixty-three counties, fifty-three counties, including Indian River County, impose an additional one percent tourist tax; forty-four counties, including Indian River County, impose a one percent professional sports franchise tax, and thirty counties impose the second one percent professional sports franchise tax. 259 Table 6.2 displays the tourist taxes imposed in counties that are geographically proximate to Indian River County. Compared to neighboring counties, Indian River County imposes a similar level of tourist taxes. Palm Beach County has the highest tourist tax levy of the six counties listed (6.0%), followed by Brevard, St. Lucie, and Martin Counties at 5.0%. While Indian River County has a tourist tax rate of 4.00%, Okeechobee County has the lowest tourist tax levy at 3.0%. Table 6.2: Optional Tourist. Taxes on Transient Rental Facilities Original Professional Additional Maximum County Tourist Additional Sports Professional Potential % Total % Levy Tax Tax Franchise Sports Le Levy Facility Tax Franchise Tax Brevard 2.00% 1.00% 1.00% 1.00% 5.00% 5.00% Indian River 2.00% 1.00% 1.00% ---------- 5.00% 4.00% Martin 2.00% 1.00% 1.00% 1.00% 5.00% 5.00% Okeechobee 2.00% 1.00% ---------- ---------- 5.00% 3.00% Palm Beach 2.00% 1.00% 1.00% 1.00% 6.00%* 6.00%* St. Lucie 2.00% 1.00% 1.00% 1.00% 5.00% 5.00% Note: Shading indicates those counties eligible to impose a particular tax *Palm Beach County is 1 out of 9 counties in the state that can also impose a 1% High Tourism Impact Tax, which it currently does levee. Source: The Florida Legislature's Office of Economic and Demographic Research website: November 20182019 The Local Option Tourist Tax can be used for the following purposes: (1) Acquire, construct, extend, enlarge, remodel, repair, improve, maintain, operate, and promote one or more publicly owned and operated convention centers, such as sports stadiums, coliseums, or auditoriums within the district that the tax is imposed; (2) Acquire, construct, extend, enlarge, remodel, repair, improve, maintain, operate, and promote aquariums, or museums that are publicly owned and operated or owned and operated by a not-for-profit organization and open to the public, within the boundaries of the county or subcounty special taxing district in which the tax is levied; (3) Promote zoological parks that are publicly owned and operated or owned and operated by not-for-profit organizations and open to the public; Community Development Department Indian River County Adopted December , 2019, Ordinance 2019-_ 8 260 (4) Promote and advertise tourism nationally, internationally, and in the State of Florida; (5) Fund convention bureaus and other tourist information bureaus as county agencies or by L h r111__1_ f contract wrt t e er o Commerce or similar associations in the county; (6) Finance beach park facilities, or beach, channel, estuary, or lagoon improvement, maintenance, renourishment, restoration, and erosion control, including construction of beach groins and shoreline protection, enhancement, cleanup, or restoration or inland lakes and rivers to which there is public access as those uses relate to the physical preservation of the beach, shoreline, channel, estuary, lagoon, or inland lake or river; (7) Pledge the revenues to secure and liquidate revenue bonds issued by the county, subject to certain limitations. Figure 6.7 -shows the Tourist Development Tax revenue received by Indian River County over the last six fiscal years. Since FY 2011,112FY 2012/13, Tourist Development Tax revenue has increased 75.5�/�73.55%. ➢ Local Option Fuel Tax Local governments are authorized to levy up.to twelve cents of local option fuel taxes in the form of three separate levies. Those levies are: ➢ a one to six cent local option fuel tax; ➢ a one to five cent local option fuel tax; and ➢ a ninth cent fuel tax. Indian River County currently imposes the full six cents of the one to six cent fuel tax. That tax applies to every net gallon of motor and diesel fuel sold within the county. The one to six cent fuel tax may be authorized by an ordinance adopted by a majority vote of the governing body or voter approval in a county -wide referendum. Generally, the proceeds may be used to fund transportation expenditures. Table 6.1 shows that local option fuel tax revenue represented �°l01.40% of all funds collected by Indian River County for FY ''�TFY 2017/18. Figure 6.8 shows that, between since FY 'z FY 2012/13 and FY 20144 -5 -there has been a dewi+war-d an upward trend with local option fuel tax 261 Figure 6.8: Local Option Fuel Tax Revenue by FY $4,500 $4,000 $3,508 $3,574 $3,651 $3,830 $3,500 $3,145 $3,133 $3,000 $2,500 $2,000 $1,500 $1,000 $500 12/13 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 ® Revenue (in thousands) Source: Indian River County Finance Department Figure 6.7 -shows the Tourist Development Tax revenue received by Indian River County over the last six fiscal years. Since FY 2011,112FY 2012/13, Tourist Development Tax revenue has increased 75.5�/�73.55%. ➢ Local Option Fuel Tax Local governments are authorized to levy up.to twelve cents of local option fuel taxes in the form of three separate levies. Those levies are: ➢ a one to six cent local option fuel tax; ➢ a one to five cent local option fuel tax; and ➢ a ninth cent fuel tax. Indian River County currently imposes the full six cents of the one to six cent fuel tax. That tax applies to every net gallon of motor and diesel fuel sold within the county. The one to six cent fuel tax may be authorized by an ordinance adopted by a majority vote of the governing body or voter approval in a county -wide referendum. Generally, the proceeds may be used to fund transportation expenditures. Table 6.1 shows that local option fuel tax revenue represented �°l01.40% of all funds collected by Indian River County for FY ''�TFY 2017/18. Figure 6.8 shows that, between since FY 'z FY 2012/13 and FY 20144 -5 -there has been a dewi+war-d an upward trend with local option fuel tax 261 revenue for the county. , revenue�neantly�c�eased. Them rincrease in local option fuel tax revenue can be attributed to an improving economy and lower fuel prices which have led to an increase in fuel consumption. All sixty-seven Florida counties levy the full $0.06 of the original local option fuel tax. Table 6.3 identifies the local fuel taxes levied in Indian River County and in other counties in the region. As shown in Table 6.3, Saint Lucie, Martin, Okeechobee, and Palm Beach counties all levy the highest allowable fuel taxes at $0.12 per gallon. Those four counties impose both the Ninth Cent Fuel Tax and the One to Five Cent Local Option Fuel Tax. While Indian River County is eligible to levy the Ninth -Cent Fuel Tax and the One to Five Cent Local Option Fuel Tax either by extraordinary vote of the Board of County Commissioners or by voter approval in a countywide referendum, it does not currently levy either tax. At this time, fifty-three of the sixty-seven Florida counties levy the Ninth -Cent Fuel Tax, while thirty-four of the sixty-seven Florida counties impose at least a portion of the One to Five Cent Local Option Fuel Tax. Table 6.3: Local Fuel Tax Rates County One to Six Cent Local Option Fuel Tax One to Five Cent Local Option Fuel Tax Ninth Cent Fuel Tax Total Local Fuel Tax Brevard $0.06 -------- -------- $0.06 Indian River $0.06 -------- -------- $0.06 Martin $0.06 $0.05 $0.01 $0.12 Okeechobee $0.06 $0.05 $0.01 $0.12 Palm Beach $0.06 $0.05 $0.01 $0.12 St. Lucie $0.06 $0.05 $0.01 $0.12 Source: The Florida Legislature's Office of Economic and Demographic Research website: November 20192019. Franchise Fee/Tax Counties and municipalities may exercise their home rule authority to impose a fee upon a utility for the grant of a franchise and the privilege of the utility using the local government's rights-of-way to conduct the utility's business. Franchise fees are typically levied through a franchise agreement negotiated between the local government and the utility provider. Indian River County receives franchise revenue from electric, water, sewer, garbage, and cable television franchises. 262 Table 6.1 shows that franchise fee revenue represented 3.77-0,;3.46% of all funds collected by Indian River County in �'�"�TFY 2017/18. Figure 6.9 shows that since FY' 2 FY 2012/13 franchise fee revenue collected by Indian River County increased 5.920' and ^s+--eeePA f years Hutt^ to 7.13%. Other Miscellaneous Revenue Included in this category are various administrative fees, licenses and permits, fines, interest income, rental income, private contributions, and other miscellaneous revenues. This source of revenue for Indian River County represented 4.780-7.17% of all funds collected in FY ''� FY 2017/18. Borrowing As needed, the county uses borrowing as a financing vehicle to raise money for public purposes that are beyond the realm of current cash reserves, operating Figure 6.9: Franchise Fee/Tax Revenue by FY $9,500 $9,aa8 $9,400 $9,311 $9,300 — $9,274 $9,200 $9,181 1 $9,130 $9,100 $9,000 $8,900 $8,819 $8,800 $8,700 $8,600 $8,500 12/13 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 revenue and reasonable taxation. ® Revenue (in thousands) Currently, borrowing money to pay for Source: I nd ian River Cou nty Finance Department capital improvements can be done through either short-term or long-term financing. Short term financing is usually accomplished by the use of bond pools, notes, private placements with banks, and the public placement of Voted General Obligation debt. Long term financing is usually achieved through the issuance of bonds sold on the public market. According to state law, local governments may sell bonds for capital improvements without a referendum of the voters if the pledge used for the bond is a non -ad valorem revenue source. Conversely, any bond issue pledging ad valorem taxes requires approval through a voter referendum. General Obligation Bonds are bonds that are secured by the full faith and credit of the issuing government. Those bonds are secured by a pledge of the issuer's ad valorem taxing power. According to state law, the amount of ad valorem taxes necessary to pay the debt service on general obligation bonds is not subject to the constitutional property tax millage limits. Such bonds constitute debts of the issuer and require approval through a voter referendum prior to issuance. Revenue bonds are bonds payable from a specific source of revenue, where the full faith and credit of the issuer is not pledged to repay the bonds. Because revenue bonds are payable from identified sources of revenue, bond holders may not compel taxation or legislative appropriation of funds for 263 payment of debt service. Pledged revenues may be derived from operation of financed projects, grants, or other specified non -ad valorem taxes. A public referendum is not required prior to issuance or validation of such obligations. In the past, the county has issued revenue bonds to finance improvements to its sanitary sewer, potable water, and golf course facilities. Also, revenue bonds have been issued to finance the cost of construction of various capital improvement projects. Deposits from bond revenues are put into the respective bond fund accounts for those projects, whereby funds are specifically designated for a particular project, and user charges are used to pay off the debt. Special assessment bonds are bonds issued to pay for capital improvements that impact specific areas or groups of property owners. Proceeds from the assessments levied against benefiting property owners are used to pay off the bond debt. The issuance of those bonds does not need to be approved by voter referendum. Revenue bonds and special assessment bonds are similar in nature, except that special assessment bond debt is paid -off by assessments levied against benefiting property owners and not from ongoing user charges. The county has issued special assessment bonds for solid waste disposal. The issuance of tax anticipation or bond anticipation notes is an example of a short-term (less than five years) method of financing. Notes usually have higher interest rates than bonds and have shorter maturity dates than bonds. Tax anticipation notes are issued in advance of a new fiscal year to cover gaps in the budget before property taxes are received, while bond anticipation notes are issued in anticipation of the receipt by the county of proceeds from the sale of corresponding future bond issues. The county currently has no outstanding tax or bond anticipation notes. Additional Optional Local Revenue Sources Occasionally, the use of additional revenue sources may be necessary, depending on priorities mandated by the Board of County Commissioners and the availability of existing revenue sources. In such cases, Indian River County has two options to increase local revenues. One is to implement new taxes that are permitted by state regulation, while the other is to increase existing taxes and fees that are imposed by the county. Additional local revenue sources available to Indian River County include the Ninth Cent Fuel Tax, the One to Five Cent Local Option Fuel Tax, and the Professional Sports Franchise Facility Tax. Both the Ninth Cent Fuel Tax and the One to Five Cent Local Option Fuel Tax are taxes on the purchase of fuel. With the Ninth Cent Fuel Tax, a one cent per gallon tax on motor fuel and special fuel can be levied on fuel purchases in the county. Revenue from the Ninth Cent Fuel Tax may be shared with municipalities, but counties are not required by law to share the proceeds. Authorized uses for revenue collected from the Ninth Cent Fuel Tax include paying the costs and expenses of establishing, operating, and maintaining a transportation system and related facilities. Additional uses include funding the acquisition, construction, reconstruction, and maintenance of roads. 264 The One to Five Cent Local Option Fuel Tax is a one to five cents tax that can be levied upon every gallon of motor fuel sold in Indian River County. Revenues from that fuel tax must be shared among all eligible jurisdictions in the county as a result of an interlocal agreement or by an historical transportation expenditures formula. Authorized uses for revenue collected from the One to Five Cent Fuel Tax include transportation expenditures needed to meet the requirements of the Capital Improvements Element of the Comprehensive Plan. A Professional Sports Franchise Facility Tax is a levy of up to I% on any lodging agreement for six months or less. Revenue from this tax may be used to pay the debt service on bonds issued to finance the construction, reconstruction, or renovation of a professional sports franchise facility. State Sources Revenue classified as state sources may be generated locally but collected by the state and returned to the county. Table 6.1 displays the state revenue sources applicable to Indian River County. Those sources are described in further detail below. Figure 6.10: Half Cent Sales Tax Revenue $12,000 by FY _ $10,000 $9,0aa $9,432 $91908 $7,829 $8,220 $8,685 $8,000 � i � � I $6,000 i $4,000 $2,000 $- IF 12/13 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 m Revenue (in thousands) Source: Indian River County Finance Department Local Government Half -Cent Sales Tax The Local Government Half Cent Sales Tax Program allocates 8.9744% of net sales tax proceeds remitted by sales tax dealers in a county to a special account administered by the Department of Revenue; that account is the Local Government Half Cent Sales Tax Clearing Trust Fund. Those funds are then earmarked for distribution to the governing body of the county and each municipality within the county. Distribution of those monies within the county is determined by a formula that uses a weighting factor based on the population of the incorporated and unincorporated areas and multiplies that factor by 8.9744% of the sales tax proceeds received by the county. In F�"�/7FY 2017/18, Indian River County received $9,432,000-$9,908,000 through the half -cent sales tax. As shown in Table 6.1, that amount represented 0-3.63% of all funds collected by Indian River County during the 2016,117 2017/2018 fiscal year. Figure 6.10 displays the funds made available to Indian River County through the half -cent local government sales tax over the last six fiscal years. Overall, Indian River County's half -cent sales tax revenue increased between Fiscal Year 2011/122012/13 and Fiscal Year 2n�2017/18. 265 Occasionally, governments can receive supplemental distributions by meeting special eligibility criteria; however, in no case can the total supplemental and ordinary distribution exceed the maximum per capita amount allowed by law. Governments are allowed wide latitude in using the half cent sales tax. For counties, the law provides only that half cent sales tax revenue be used for countywide tax relief or countywide programs. + County Revenue Sharing The current structure of the county revenue sharing program consists of two revenue sources. Those sources include 2.90% of net cigarette tax collections and 2.0810% of sales and use tax collections. Proceeds are collected by the state and then distributed to eligible counties based on an allocation formula. There are no use restrictions on the distributed revenue; however, there are some statutory limitations regarding those funds being used as a pledge for indebtedness. To receive distribution proceeds through the county revenue sharing program, counties must meet the following criteria: Figure 6.11: County Revenue Sharing $4,000 by FY 3,$3,797 $3,601 $3,500 $3,333 $3,082 $3,000 $z,ssa $2,500 $2,000 fl $1,500 $1,000 $500 $- 12/13 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 ® Revenue (in thousands) Source: Indian River County Finance Deparment (1) Law enforcement officers and firefighters are certified and meet state requirements; (2) Certification of taxable value for a property tax levy is made in a timely and correct manner to the Department of Revenue; (3) The county's most recent financial reports must have been sent to the Department of Financial Services, and post audits of those statements and accounts must have been provided. Table 6.1 shows that county revenue sharing funds represented 1.49-1,;1.39% of all funds collected by Indian River County in FY 7FY 2017/18. Figure 6.11 shows that, FIGURE 6.12: Constitutional Fuel Tax Revenue by FY $1,900 $1,85 $1,850 $1,800 $1,750 $1,700 $1,650 $1,600 $1,550 $1,500 $1,450 $1,400 12113 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18, 11 Revenue (in thousands) Source: Indian River County Finance Department between Fiscal Year 201 1z 12 2012/13 and 12017/18, Indian River County's revenue sharing gradually increased. 266 • Constitutional Fuel Tax The constitutional fuel tax is defined as an excise or license tax of two cents per gallon of motor fuel, imposed upon the first sale or first removal from storage (after importation into Florida). Revenues from this levy become state funds at the time of collection by the refiner, importer or wholesaler. In its current form, the constitutional fuel tax is a state -shared revenue source for counties only. Applying adistribution formula, the state allocates proceeds to counties to the extent necessary to comply with all obligations to or for the benefit of holders of bonds, revenue certificates, and tax anticipation certificates or any refunds secured by any portion of the tax proceeds. After complying with the necessary debt service obligations, the state distributes a county's surplus funds to its governing body. Figure 6.13: County Fuel Tax by FY $840 $820 $800 $780 $760 $740 $720 $700 $680 Elm M M M Eli $660 $640 $620 -, 12/13 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 ® Revenue (in thousands) Source: I ndian River County Finance Department Table 6.1 shows that revenue received from the constitutional fuel tax levy represented 0.75-03; 0.68% of total revenue received by Indian River County in FY 2016/172017/18. Figure 6.12 shows that, over the last six fiscal- years, constitutional fuel tax revenue received by Indian River County A b J3 -C9-0/15 11 ° increase y /o. • County Fuel Tax The county fuel tax is levied on motor fuel at the rate of one cent per net gallon. The legislative intent of this tax is to reduce a county's reliance on ad valorem taxes. Funds received from this tax can be used by a county for transportation -related expenses, including the reduction of bond indebtedness incurred for transportation purposes. Table 6.1 shows that funds received through the county fuel tax levy represented 0.330,;-0.30% of all revenue collected by Indian River County in FY X72017/18. Figure 6.13 shows that, Figure 6.14: Alcoholic Beverage License Tax by FY $80 - $70 $60 $50 $40 $30 $20 $10 $ M 0 Eli - 12/13 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 M Reven ue (in thousands) Source: Indian River County Finance Department 267 �1 ■ ■ I■ ill■ ■ ■ 267 over the last six fiscal years, county fuel tax revenue received by Indian River County increased Alcoholic Beverage License Tax Alcoholic beverage license taxes are levied on manufacturers, distributors, vendors, and sales agencies of alcoholic beverages in Florida. The tax is administered, collected, enforced, and distributed to local governments by the Division of Alcoholic Beverages and Tobacco within the Department of Business and Professional Regulation. Twenty-four percent of the license taxes imposed on the sale of beer, wine and liquor collected within a county is returned to the county Tax Collector. The remaining funds are used to operate the division and contribute to the operation of the Office of the Secretary of Business Regulation. Table 6.1 shows that the county received approximately $66,0)4-j69 000 from this tax in FY 2n�2017/18, 0.03% of all revenue received by Indian River County. Figure 6.14 shows that, over the last six fiscal years, alcoholic beverage license tax revenue received by Indian River County fluctuated. Distribution of Sales and Use Taxes to Counties According to Florida Statutes, a guaranteed entitlement of $29,915,500 is equally distributed among Florida's sixty-seven counties, providing each county's general revenue fund with $446,500. Table 6.1 shows that revenue received from the Distribution of Sales and Use Taxes represented -0.1 0 0.16% of revenues received by Indian River County in FY 2016,1172017/18. Uses for this revenue are determined by the Board of County Commissioners. Mobile Home License Tax An annual license tax is levied on all mobile homes and park trailers, and on all travel trailers and fifth -wheel trailers exceeding thirty-five feet in body length. The license taxes, ranging from $20 to $80 depending on body length, are collected in lieu of ad valorem taxes. The taxes are collected by county tax collectors and remitted to the Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles. From each license, two deductions are made. The first is a deduction of $1.50 by the Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles, with $114 $112 $110 $108 $106 $104 $102 $100 $98 Figure 6.15: Mobile Home License Tax Revenue by FY 12/13 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 ® Revenue (in thousands) Source: Indian River County Finance Department 268 proceeds deposited into the State General Revenue Fund. The second is a deduction of $1.00, with proceeds deposited into the Florida Mobile Home Relocation Trust Fund. The remaining balance is deposited into the License Tax Collection Trust Fund for distribution to units of local government. A county government is eligible to receive proceeds from this tax if taxable mobile home units are located in its unincorporated area. An authorized use of the proceeds is not specified in the current law. Table 6.1 shows that funds received through the mobile home license tax represented -0:05;/0.04% of all revenue received by Indian River County in FY 2016/172017/18. Figure 6.15 shows that, mobile home license tax revenue received by Indian River County fluctuated between FY 1-2012/13 and FY 12017/18. Various Grants Table 6.1 shows that funds received in the form of state grants represented X000,; 2.79% of funds received by the county in FY 4046472017/18. Those state grant funds received by the county originated from the Division of Emergency Management, the Florida Housing Finance Corporation, the Florida Department of State, the Florida Department of Environmental Protection, the Florida Department of Transportation, the Florida Department of Revenue, the Florida Department of Law Enforcement, the Florida Department of Economic Opportunity, and the Florida Department of Health. Federal Sources Federal funds are either granted directly to local governments or passed through state agencies for administration and monitoring. Those grants are usually distributed on a competitive basis rather than by formula allocations, thereby making forecasts of future revenues difficult. For the purpose of revenue forecasts, those sources will be assumed to remain constant. During FY 2016/1:7.2017/18; the county received approximately $8�-929,000-$9,724,000 in federal funds. Those funds represented 3..68-1,; 3.57% of all funds received by Indian River County in FY 2016,1172017/18. Overall Revenue Sources As mandated by state statute, the financial resources of the county are categorized according to the state Chart of Accounts. The categories in the state Chart of Accounts are taxes, licenses and permits, intergovernmental revenue, charges for services, fines and forfeitures, and miscellaneous revenues. Table 6.4 identifies the total amount of historic revenue generated from those sources for fiscal years 2011,112 2012/13 through 2016,1172017/18. 269 Table 6.4: Indian River County General Revenues By Source Fiscal Year Licenses & Intergovernmental Charges for Fines & Miscellaneous Totals Taxes Permits Revenue Services Forfeitures Revenues 699;472;369 c11,"T-r-�86,235 $29,832,306 $3.7,664,49 S739;273 96,344,$61 c1nc� �"o-.-+5-,�,�°c 2012/2013 $88,005,422 $12,769,844 $30,800,036 $59,536,566 $778,575 $4,934,481 $196,824,924 2013/2014 $94,585,345 $14,321,389 $30,873,889 $63,414,219 $1,004,374 $4,141,341 $208,340,557 2014/2015 $100,182,672 $18,471,625 $33,624,651 $62,987,961 $924,860 $4,548,434 $220,740,203 2015/2016 $109,101,602 $19,872,044 $33,535,027 $62 868 855 $1,708,273 $10 591 490 $237,677,291 2016/2017 $115,774,419 $19,558,052 $31,587,431 $64,685,312 $1,680,464 $9,058,093 $242,343,771 2017/2018 5125.723.036 I 322.425.960 537.168.177 $67.769.381 51.739.585 517.885.999 $272.712.138 Source: Indian River County Comprehensive Annual Financial Report, 2016-17.2017/18 & Indian River County Finance Department. Figure 6.16 displays the distribution of revenue by the same categories listed in table 6.4 for each of the last six fiscal years. Figure 6.16: Distribution of General Revenues By Category 2013 44.71% 6.49% 15.65% 2.51% 30.25% 0.40% 45.90% 8.36% 14.11% u y 4.46% 26.45% 0.72% O Taxes G Charges for Services 2014 45.40% - 6.87% 14.82% 99% n 411% 30.44% 2017 47.77% 8.07% 13.03% 74% 0.69% 26.69% ® Licenses & Permits M Fines & Forfeitures 2015 45.38% 8.37% 15.23% 2.06% 2% 28.53% 0.4 2018 37.0% 12.2% is 2.-� 23.7% 21.69%.6.0% 12.5% 3.71 % 0.2% O Intergovernmental Revenue B Miscellaneous Revenues 270 Expenditures In the previous sub -section, the various revenue and income sources currently utilized by Indian River County were reviewed: This sub -section of the Capital Improvements Element identifies how those monies are allocated to meet the County's needs. Table 6.5 presents the County's overall general expenditures by category for fiscal years 201142 2012/13 through 2016/1-2017/18. Table 6.5: Indian River County General Government Expenditures By Function and by FY Fiscal Year 2012/132014112 2013/14 3 2014/15 2013/14 2015/16 241446 2016/17 2017/18 General Government $21,965,255 $21,517,147 $23,569,495 $23,028,473 $29,456,693 $30,631,940 Public Safety $66,908328 $H9490�96 $70,368,651 $74,492323 $81,251,970 &74,491_423 "� $89,841,802 $92,695363 $783Fi8-6§4 QQ+3� $89441-893 Physical Environment $46,668,122 c"„�^'_ $49,893,042 $48,474,272 $49,148,815 $55,578,221 $59,317,463 $46,665-122 $49,893943 $48,474,27-2- $494-49-813 Transportation $37,687,588 $34,859,058 $97.687.588 $29:812,672 $30,991,899 $29,314,242 $� $31,359,379 $34439-,M S29,812,02 c2_n z�T�4a Economic Environment $2,581A01$1,106,886$436,320 V_-_0244-94 `�Q 10, 4�n' $ F F96 836 $424,593 S436,344 $437,031 $434393 $426,085 W7-,0 Human Services $6,952,460 "149"93, $7,178542 519,756 $7,868,392 $& 116.9 10 x$68 39? $9,302,125 U444,944 $61932-468 c� ,�, �'Q-`�".� &7 `�, X19,756 Culture/Recreation $14,613,121 �4 $15,178,817 $19,857,345 $24.240,179 $15,891,840 c1n��� $14,980,225 crn c��1 Q, 7 c,n o��c c,c�o4-,88 Court Related $6,054,822 a16 6 487 066 O<A 21 6$ , 77,909 a $6,605,682 $6,755,050 $6,540,045 Debt Service $8,168,704$5,684,616 $.19-4$6-983 5446 070 $5-684 6�Ei $5,215,007 5 230 52$5,270,153 S5,N5 097 cc�220 $8,168-704 S5,446,94 TOTAL $211,599,801 $ 13 068 63.3 $212,274,665 $216,286,162 $228,775,010 $240,622,309 $250,522,778 63-44 9,804, 9212 ,2,66 oon ccc �2 e��o�—''cT^oro' n 1240 6 309 Source: Indian River County Comprehensive Annual Financial Report,'_044-` "201 /l . Table 6.5 shows expenditures in nine categories. Depending on the county's activities in any given fiscal year, the level of expenditures may fluctuate for certain categories. Figure 6.17 displays the percentage distribution of Indian River County's general expenditures over the last six fiscal years. 271 Figure 6.17: General Government Expenditures by Function 2013 31.6°6 10.4% 22.1% 3.9% 17.8% 3286 1.2% 2016 35.5% 10.1% 21.5°i 2.3%21-90% . 10-. 6%- 13.5% 3.4 0.2% ® General Government ® Transportation C Culture/Recreation General Government 33.1% 2014 10.1 % 23:5% 2.7% / 16.4% 3.1 %J 7.2% 3.38-17,_. 2017 37.3% 12.2% 2.2% 2.8% 6.6% 12.2% 3.373% o 0.2 /o IN Public Safety W Economic Environment m Court Related 2015 34.4% 10.9% 22.4% 2.5% "s 13.8% 3.1 %)9.2% 3.477 0 0.2% 2018 -"- 37.0% 2.1% 23.7% 2.6%Y6.0% 12.5% 3.71 % __, ❑ Physical Environment ® Human Services im Debt Service A major classification of services provided by Indian River County, the general government expenditure category, consists of activities undertaken by the legislative and administrative branches of the .county government. Departments such as the Board of County Commissioners, County Administrator, Personnel, and Purchasing fall into this category, as do all Constitutional Officers, except the Sheriff.- As shown in table 6.5, $29,456,693 $30,631,940 was spent on general government services in FY 2016/17 2017/18. Between fiscal. years '0122012/13 and -:10-1-6.11-72017/18, general government expenditures increased by 339.46%. In FY 201-64' 2017/18, general government services represented 12.240,% 12.23% of all county expenses. Public Safety The Sheriff s Department, Fire Services, Advanced Life Support, Emergency Management, and the Medical Examiner fall under the category of Public Safety. As shown in table 6.5, the county, in 1✓Y-201647--FY 2017/18, spent Q4°,4 11, $92,695,363 for public safety services. Since FY Community Development Department Indian River County Adopted December , 2019, Ordinance 2019-_ 20 272 2911f-122012/13, public safety expenditures have increased by 29.85-0038.54%. Public safety represented 3 7.34°437.0% of all county expenses in FY 201-6,117 2016/17. Physical Environment The physical environment classification encompasses the county's water and waste water utilities, the Solid Waste Disposal District (SWDD), the Soil and Water Conservation District, and the Environmentally Sensitive Land Acquisition Fund. Table 6.5 shows that $5521$59,317,463 was spent on these activities in FY 20'x? 2017/18. Since FY41� 2012/13, physical environment expenditures have increased by , ''�27.10%. Physical environment services represented 23.1-0.07; 23.68% of all county expenses in FY 2016/17 2017/18. Transportation Departments under the transportation category include Road and Bridge, County Engineering, Secondary Roads Construction, and Traffic Engineering. Those departments are responsible for designing, constructing, overseeing, and maintaining the county's roads and drainage systems. As shown in table 6.5, the county spent $29,314,242.$31,359,379 on transportation facilities in FY 2016/17 2017/18. Since FY 2011-,1122012/13, transportation expenditures have decreased by10.4-5-% 16.79%. Transportation expenses represented " 12.52% of all county expenses in FY 29117 2017/18. Economic Environment Included in the economic environment category are the costs of providing services which develop and improve the economic condition of the community and its citizens. Up to June 30, 2011, Veteran Services, the Housing Authority, and the Economic Development Division of the Indian River County Chamber of Commerce primarily undertook that function. On July 1, 2011, the Housing Authority was officially separated from the County; consequently, its expenditures are no longer reported here. Table 6.5 shows that $437, PA$426,085 was spent on economic environment services in FY 2016/17 2017/18. Since FY 201142-2012/13, economic environment expenditures have decreased by 79.390%-83.49%. Economic environment expenses represented 0.18°00-0.17%0 of all county expenses in FY20464-7-2017/18. Higher expenses between FY 2011/12 and FY 2013/14 were the result of expenditure of Neighborhood Stabilization Program Community Development Block Grant funds, one time grants provided to lessen the negative effects of the economic downturn/recession and housing collapse. Human Services Human Services cover the cost of providing services for the care, treatment, and control of human illness, injury or disabilities, and for the welfare of the community as a whole and its individuals. The Health Department, Welfare, Medicaid, and Children's Services fall into this category. Table 6.5 273 shows that the County spent Q8,'�049,302,125 on human services in FY'^�47 2017/18. Since FY 201142 2012/13, human services expenditures have increased by 17e33.80. Human Services represented X37.03; 3.71% of all county expenses in FY'�iT2017/18. Culture/Recreation All costs associated with providing and maintaining cultural and recreational facilities and activities for the benefit of citizens and visitors fit into this category. County libraries, parks, recreation operations, and the golf course are included here. As shown in table 6.5, the County spent $15 40$14,980,225 on those services in FY 7-2017/18. Since FY 1 2412/13, cultural/recreation expenditures have increased by 15.040,; 2.51%. Culture/recreation expenses represented 6.60-%-5.98% of all County expenses in FY X2017/18. Court Related All costs of operating the judicial branch of Indian River County Government are classified here. That category includes the County Court, Circuit Court, State Attorney's Office and Public Defender. As shown in table 6.5, expenditures from that category totaled $6,755,050.$6,540,045 in FYI 2017/18. Between fiscal years 2015,1162016/17 and 72017/18, Court Related expenditures increased by2-'8.01 %. Court Related costs represented 2.8 1 -0,; 2.61% of all county expenses in FY 201647 2017/18. Debt Service Debt service consists of interest and payments made by the county on its debt. That figure includes principal retirement, interest and other miscellaneous debt service. As table 6.5 indicates, total County debt service expenditures were $5,'300-$5,270,153 in FY''n� 2017/18. Since FY241444 2012/13, debt service expenditures have decreased by 50.121,v 35.48%. Debt service expenses represented 2 2.10% of all County expenses in FY�n� 2017/18. Existing Outstanding Debt At the end of FY ;10 1 6 /172019/20, Indian River County's outstanding debt, comprised of revenue bonds and general obligation bonds, stood at x$14,597,000. That is shown in table 6.6. Currently, Enterprise Funds comprise 444"0 21.74% of the overall debt (Utility Dept), leaving $2 ,18,"$11,423,000 in bonds paid from general governmental funds. In November 2001, Indian River County issued the remaining $11,000,000 of the $26,000,000 Environmentally Sensitive Land Acquisition general obligation bonds originally approved by voters in 1992. Also in 2001, the County issued $16,810,000 in Spring Training Facility Bonds to finance the acquisition and expansion of the Dodgertown spring training facility (now known as Historic Dodgertown). 274 In 2004, Indian, River County voters approved the issuance of up to an additional $50,000,000 in Environmentally Sensitive Land Acquisition general obligation bonds. As a result, Indian River County issued $48,600,000 in Environmentally Sensitive Land Acquisition general obligation bonds in 2006. While the county refinanced its 1996 Series Water and Sewer Bonds in 2005 and the majority of its 1993 Series A Water and Sewer Bonds in 2009, the County retained a portion of the 1993 Series A Water and Sewer Bonds with a maturity of 2011 because it was more cost efficient than rolling the entire amount into the 2009 Water and Sewer Bonds. That portion of the water and sewer bond has since been paid off. More recently, in 2015 the 2005 Series Water and Sewer Revenue Bonds and the 2006 Series Environmental Lands Acquisition Bonds were refinanced. Those bonds were refinanced to take advantage of better interest rates. In addition, the debt issuance for the 2009 series Water and Sewer Bonds were paid off and the Spring Training Facility bonds were partially paid off during fiscal year 2018/19. This has substantially decreased the County's total bond debt. Table 6.6: Indian River County Existing Long Term Debt Initial Amount Average Final Amount Remaining Interest maturity Bond Rating Security Pledge C&09/30/2018 Rate Water & Sewer Revenue Bonds: 2015 Series $7,171,000 40 9,088 1•.65% 2 022 N/A Water & Sewer Revenues3,174,000 ' 7009 Serie &26,,;70,,000 4'4 -20 -,GN 3.68% 2-924 Ak4AA Water PSewer Revenue Recreation Revenue Bonds 2001 Series Spring $16,810,000 365,000 4.155,000 4.87% 2031 AAA/FGIC State Funds &Tourist Tax Training Facility (Insured) Voted G.O. Bonds Environmental 1 `�88 Lands Acquisition $20,369,000 7,268,000 1.66% 2021 N/A General Obligation 2015 Series Total Bonds $3900 $14,597,000 Outstanding Source: Indian River County Budget 2444-92019/20. Local Policies and Practices As part of the capital improvements planning process, it is important to do an inventory of current Indian River County policies and practices that guide the timing, location, expansion, or increase in capacity of capital facilities. Those policies and practices relate to the county's existing level -of - service standards, impact fee programs, comprehensive plan, and enterprise fund accounts. Community Development Department Indian River County Adopted December 9 2019, Ordinance 2019-_ 23 275 Existing Level -of -Service Standards Level -of -service (LOS) standards are indicators of the extent or degree of service provided by, or proposed to be provided by, a facility based on and related to the operational characteristics of the facility. Level -of -service standards indicate the capacity per unit of demand of each public facility. Level -of -service standards can affect the timing and location of development by guiding development to areas where facilities may have excess capacity. Indian River County has level -of -service standards for capital facilities as follows: ➢ Correctional Facilities (Countywide) • 4.5 beds per 1,000 permanent plus weighted peak seasonal population ➢ Fire/EMS (Countywide, excluding Indian River Shores) • .089 Stations per 1,000 permanent plus weighted peak seasonal population ➢ Law Enforcement (Unincorporated County) • 2.09 officers per 1,000 permanent plus weighted peak seasonal population ➢ Libraries (Countywide) • 580 building square feet per 1,000 permanent plus weighted peak seasonal population • 3,200 library material items per 1,000 permanent plus weighted peak seasonal population • 0.7 computers per 1,000 permanent plus weighted peak seasonal population • 0.2 other library equipment items per 1,000 permanent plus weighted peak seasonal population ➢ Potable Water (County Service Area) • 250 gallons per day per equivalent residential unit ➢ Public Buildings (Countywide) • 1.99 building square feet per capita for permanent plus weighted peak seasonal population ➢ Parks/Recreation (Unincorporated County) • 6.61 acres per 1,000 permanent plus weighted peak seasonal population ➢ Sanitary Sewer (County Service Area) • 250 gallons per day per equivalent residential unit ➢ Schools (School Service Area): • 100 percent of Florida Inventory of School Houses (FISH) capacity for each public school type (elementary, middle, and high). 276 ➢ Solid Waste (Countywide) 2.2 tons per capita per year or 3.67 cubic yards per capita for permanent plus weighted peak seasonal population per year ➢ Stormwater Management • New drainage systems shall mitigate the impacts of a 25 year/24 hour design rainfall event • Minimum road crown elevation for existing roads shall be raised during resurfacing/rebuilding to the flood elevation resulting from the 2 year/24 hour storm event on local roads • The center two lanes of rebuilt roads must be at or above flood levels resulting from a 10 year/24 hour storm event on Arterial and Collector roads • All drainage basins will meet the following level -of -service standards: • By 2000 - 2 year/24 hour storm event • By 2005 - 5 year/24 hour storm event • By 2010 - 10 year/24 hour storm event ➢ Transportation (Roadways) • Level -of -Service "D" during peak hour, peak season, and peak direction conditions on all TRIP grant funded roads as well as all freeway, arterial, and collector roadways, with the exception of the following two, which will operate at level of service "E" plus 20%: • 27th Ave — South County Line to SR 60 • 43' Ave - Oslo Road to 16th Street For SIS/Florida Intrastate Highway System roadways, level of service "B" is adopted for rural areas, and level of service "C" is adopted for urban areas. ➢ Transit One-hour headways shall be maintained on all fixed transit routes Level -of -service standards are discussed in further detail in individual Comprehensive Plan Elements. Asset-based level of service standards for impact fee calculation purposes are provided in the Impact Fee Ordinance (Title X). Capital Improvements Program A capital improvements program (CIP) is a list of capital expenditures to be incurred each year over a fixed period of years to meet anticipated capital needs. In Indian River County, the CIP identifies the projects that the County plans to undertake in the next five years and presents an estimate of the costs and the resources needed to finance the projects. Revenue sources within the first year of the CIP reflect current fund balances as well as anticipated annual revenue collection. Within the first three years of the CIP, projects are funded entirely with "committed" revenue sources. "Committed" revenue sources are revenue sources that currently exist. Projects in years four and five of the CIP 277 may be funded partially through "planned" revenue sources. "Planned" revenue sources are sources available to the County that have not been utilized. The Capital Improvements Element (CIE) itself consolidates the capital improvements needs of all elements of the Comprehensive Plan into an overall five-year Capital Improvements Schedule. The overall program lists the needs, costs, timeframes, priorities, and the necessary financial resources to . implement the identified capital improvement projects in the various elements of the plan in the next five years. Impact Fees/Capacity Charges Impact fees are charges to developers for off-site improvements that must be provided by the local government to serve new development. That financing technique is one strategy that the County uses to implement the CIE. Currently, the County has nine impact fees in place; those are traffic impact fees, which became effective in 1986, and eight additional impact fees which became effective in June of 2005. Those eight impact fees are assessed for the following service delivery categories: solid waste, public schools, fire/ems, parks and recreation, correctional facilities, law enforcement, libraries, and public buildings. In 2009, the Board of County Commissioners (BCC) voted to suspend five of the nine impact fees for a period of six months. Their intent in doing so was to help encourage development during the economic recession. Since then, the BCC has voted several times to maintain the suspension of at least three of the impact fees. Most recently, the Board of County Commissioners completed a review of all impact fees, and on April 22, 2014 adopted a revised reduced nonresidential impact fee schedule with an effective date of May 5, 2014 and adopted a revised residential impact fee schedule on October 14, 2014 with an effective date of February 2, 2015. For the new impact fee schedule, the Board of County Commissioners voted to not collect the correctional facilities, solid waste facilities, and libraries impact fees at this time. In October 1999, the county's water and sewer impact fees were reclassified as capacity charges. A capacity charge is a fee charged to the direct beneficiaries of water and sewer improvements in order to fund the capital cost incurred by the water and wastewater utility to provide capacity to serve new. utility customers. Enterprise Funds Enterprise funds are used to account for operations financed and operated in a manner similar to private businesses, when the intent of the governing body is that the full costs of providing the service to the general public on a continuing basis be financed or recovered primarily through user charges. Currently, the County operates its solid waste services, golf course facility, building division services, and utility services as enterprise funds. As a tool for affecting the timing and location of development, user charges may be designated to vary with the quantity and location of the service provided. Thus, charges could be greater for providing services further from urban areas and less for distances closer to urban areas. In this way, user charges could affect the economics of development locating further away from urban areas. 278 Analysis The analysis section of this element assesses the County's historic and projected revenue and expenditure patterns to determine the County's fiscal ability to provide 'adequate capital improvements. Those capital improvements have been identified in other comprehensive plan elements and are needed to meet the demands of existing and future development. As part of this analysis, revenue and expenditure projections are identified and analyzed, and a fiscal assessment of needs (costs) versus projected available revenue is included. Analysis of the Timing and Location of Capital Improvements Objectives and policies from the Future Land Use Element, Potable Water Sub -Element, Sanitary Sewer Sub -Element, Recreation and Open Space Element, Public School Facilities Element, and the Transportation Element, as well as policies followed by the Sheriff's office and County departments such as Emergency Management, Corrections, Libraries, and Solid Waste, have the most direct effect on the timing and location of capital improvements. Through planning for future improvements to the transportation system, the Transportation Element directly affects the development potential of property. Also affecting the development potential of property are the water and sewer connection requirements and the availability of parks, and public school capacity. Within the Future Land Use Element (FLUE), the assignment of land use density and intensity, as well as the urban service area regulations, affect the timing and location of capital improvements. Consistent with the FLUE and urban service area requirements in the County's comprehensive plan, the County provides public facilities and services to promote compact development by emphasizing infill development in urban areas and maximizing the efficiency of existing facilities and services in underutilized areas. The FLUE also limits urban sprawl and ensures that adequate facilities will be present to accommodate future growth. Maximizing the use of existing facilities and controlling urban sprawl will contribute to a cost-effective and efficient service delivery system. Using the County's official Future Land Use Map and Future Thoroughfare Plan Map, as well as the County's water and wastewater connection matrix, in planning for future locations of facilities provides for efficient and orderly expansion of public facilities, provides for efficient growth in desired areas, discourages growth in undesirable areas, and protects environmentally sensitive lands. Consistent with that policy, development orders are issued only after a determination is made that adequate public facilities and services will be available to meet the demand of new development. Overall, the objectives of the FLUE, Transportation Element, Parks and Recreation Element, Potable Water Sub -Element, Sanitary Sewer Sub -Element, and the Public School Facilities Element are 279 furthered by the extension of facilities and services in a logical and efficient manner. That is accomplished by implementing the adopted Capital Improvements Element and its corresponding Schedule of Capital Improvements. Successful and efficient implementation of those items ensures that facilities and services will be in place concurrent with future demand. If a capital improvements project is not included in the adopted Schedule of Capital Improvements and the improvement is required to maintain adopted level -of -service standards, future development will be prohibited until the necessary facilities are in place. That, in effect, indirectly controls the timing and location of future development and, in turn, furthers the implementation of the Future Land Use Element and Transportation Element objectives. Appendix A constitutes the County's five year schedule of capital improvements. The purpose of the CIP is to ensure that improvements to existing facilities and construction of new facilities are completed as needed. By implementing the five year schedule of capital improvements, the county will ensure that appropriate areas will be served by needed facilities, thus maintaining adopted levels of service. Besides implementing the components of this element, the County coordinates with the St. Johns River Water Management District (SJRWMD) and the various state agencies, such as the Florida Department of Transportation, when those agencies program facility or service improvements within Indian River County. The continuation of that coordination will ensure that the plans of state agencies and the SJRWMD will be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and the timing and location of capital improvements as identified in the CIE. Forecasted Revenues In order to develop a financially feasible schedule of capital improvements, projected revenues over the five-year CIP time period are calculated. Those revenues are then compared to anticipated expenditures on capital improvements. For the first three years of the plan, only committed and available revenue sources are utilized. In developing revenue estimates for that process, the County considers historic revenue trends, current and anticipated economic conditions, population and growth trends, legislative changes, and any other factors that may impact future revenue streams. That analysis is far more complex than projecting prior trends into the future. That is evident in the forecasted revenues shown in this section. Since the start of the decline of the housing boom and throughout the economic recession that followed, there was a gradual decrease in most of the County's revenue sources. With the ongoing economic recovery, forecasts show for all revenue sources except "Other Sources", an increase in total revenue through FY 2022,123 2023/24, of�°,;10.38%. The "Other Sources" category included revenue sources such as grants that can vary year to year. Many of the revenue sources identified in the CIP have unique characteristics. For example, sales taxes react differently than gas taxes to similar circumstances. The analysis accounts for such 280 differences. Because gas taxes are levied on a per gallon basis rather than a price percentage basis like the sales tax, gas taxes do not increase as a result of rising prices the way that sales taxes do. Further, gas taxes do not typically decline as significantly as sales taxes during economic slowdowns. For property taxes, impact fees, user fees, interest earnings, and other revenues, additional behavioral characteristics were considered in forecasting future receipts. All such forecasts were developed with the use of professionally accepted methodologies. To ensure a financially balanced CIP (see Appendix A), scheduled expenditures were constrained by projected revenues. As part of this capital improvements element, the County's general revenues were forecasted for fiscal years -2018,119-2019/20 through 2422442023/24. This section addresses general revenues and earmarked projected revenues as well as the county's tax base and millage rate projections. • Overall Forecasted Revenues Table 6.7 summarizes the County's forecasted revenue for fiscal years 21-9-2019/20 through �n 39023/24. Those revenues include the County's general governmental funds, enterprise funds, and internal funds. As table 6.7 shows, general revenue collected by the County is forecast to decrease from fiscal year 2n�2019/20 to fiscal year ==32023/24 with revenues from "Other Sources" such as grants decreasing. Projecting a decrease in grant funding due to uncertainty of future grants is a conservative approach. Actual grant funding may be greater than projected. Table 6.7: Overall General Revenue Projection Summary FY 201.849-2019/20 2019/20 2020/21 2020/24-2021/22 2024fa22022/23 20aa4 2023/24 TOTAL Taxes s!35,293,,4§0 $145,293 007 $138;676;099 $148,925,000 $142143;800 $152,648,000 $145,69:7,000 $156,464,000 $149;339,888 ILD176 000763 X48,50 706 0 7 Permits, Fees & Special Assess. $31,56:7,629 $3o z�nw 933166,.000 e'�88 $34;845;009 $163;930;633 $33,021,441 33 847.000 $34.693.000 35 560 AOQ $36-449.000173 570 441.00 Intergovern- $22,880,216 $23 n�00 $24,039,009 $24,639,000 $25,255,0 $129,264,216 ment 23 501 341 $24,089,000 $2091,000 $253 8 000 $25,941,000 $123,530,341.00 Charges for $77,006,893 $78;932,888 $ 00 $ 00 $85,001,0 S494,772,89 c4n�99 Services $83395.900 $85.276.000 $87.40&000 000 $89 593 000 19L833,000 000 $437 305 900.00 Judgements, Fines & $440168 $429,909 $434-000 $442,089 $443-800 $2,156,160 Forfeitures $463,120 $475,000 $487,000 iMoffl 1511,000 $2 435_1 2000 Interest & eo�0 $5-489-880 $8,701,,099 $8,949•,889 $9,142,999 $43 c�0 Misc. $9.061,0 9 $9,288,000 19,520000 oQ 758 000 $10.002 000 47 629 04 . Other Sources �� 532 4--,�='-'� $191,529,443 eon 188 23 "T`o'=" $79,923,833 $67,4 40,191 $450,194,233 $123,445.29 $112300,161 1 $82,680,698 $23,474,906 1 172150 983 1 $484 252 047 TOTAL $397,552, n 417,981,157 $3o�449 $414.200.161 1 $368,572,234 392 127 693 6376,643-893 JILQ&56 906 1 c � o�srr,475,1n91 1122A62M 1 $1,897,999,625 $2,032,428,2Q5 Source: Indian River County Office of Management and Budget. Community Development Department Indian River County Adopted December , 2019, Ordinance 2019-_ 29 281 Earmarked Projected Revenues Earmarked revenues are revenues that are restricted in terms of use. Such revenues may be found in the Transportation Element, Sanitary Sewer Sub -Element, Potable Water Sub -Element, and Solid Waste Sub -Element. Table 6.8 provides a summary of earmarked revenue forecasts by applicable comprehensive plan element for fiscal years 2n�2019/20 through 2022432023/24. As shown in table 6.8, forecasted transportation revenues are broken down by their sources. Earmarked forecasted transportation revenues are expected to increase by 6..4--07; 5.96% over the next five fiscal years, from $27,4 6Q,-GNJ2j206,075 in FY 201892019/20 to $29�-33438T$29,996,211 in FY 2022432023/24. For potable water and sanitary sewer, earmarked revenue is expected to increase by 9.41--0,;9.40% over the next five fiscal years, from $34,744$37,117,014 in FY 20�2019/20 to $38,395,000 $40,970,000 in FY 232023/24. Over the next five years, earmarked revenue for solid waste is expected to increase by 9.41.0,;9.40% from $15,881,20-5$16,237,578 in FY 20i81119-2019/20 to $1 1 m�wnn$17924000 in FY n,, 2022/232023/24. _ Table 6.8: Earmarked Projected Revenue by Comprehensive Plan Element Transportation Potable Local 1 cent Fiscal Water & Solid Waste Year Constitutional County Traffic Interest on Sanitary as optional Total Gas Tax* Gas Tax Tax Impact Fee sales tax Gas Tax Sewer 29is.49 2019/20 $3780;000 $3.600.000 $1;833;088 $1.877.925 $888;888 S815.000$2.843.150 $3,8M,00 M8,250;988 $19.000.000 $70.000 $27,460;009 S2&206,075 075 S34,43,944 3 I I 14 $is o�nne $16.237.578 3819/38 $3;73;;889 600 000 $1;843;999 1 8 $89&,808 $2,84;,Q0 2 5i8,6i5,008 $70.000 $27;916;998 28 6420 0 $35,654;889 4 $16,278,999 1 44 X2020/21 '2020rLT 2021/22 $3,-74;880 $3,600,00 $1;864;888 S 1,916,OOQ $846;888 $831,$2.901.000 $271;088 $4;487388 1 $70.000 $28,3;9;388 $29,085,600 $36345,888 $38,996,009 $16683-088 L17.060.000 2'0222'3 2022//23,316m $3,813;888 $1,989,808 $824;888 $2,,984,888 $18;367;946 $28,859,046 $3,439;888 $4:1,!0 ,000 RaL= HUM IZXO-000 IZLL62 952 $70,000 2 5 6 52 1 487 000 2023/24 $3,858;880 $};599;999 $832;880 $2,929,00 cin , 4 3o $38,396,00 9 3 600 000 1954 4 2 2 566 211 $70 000 29 996 211 4$17,924,000 Source: Indian River County Office of Management and Budget • Tax Base, Assessment Ratio, Millage Rate Table 6.9 summarizes the county's tax base forecasts which are categorized by fund through FY 2022E232023/24. Overall, the countywide ad valorem tax base is the same as the general fund category identified in table 6.9. 282 Table 6.9: Indian River County Tax Base and Millage Projections Fiscal General Fund M.S.T.U. Emergency Services District Environmental Land Acquisition Year Tax Base Millage Tax Base Millage Tax Base Millage Tax Base Millage 30iwi8 2019/20 $17,369,356,65 518576104581 3.4694 3,5475 $938-5,018;162 $10,22p2,7�4p1,3�9�6 j.0:733 1.1506 S14,262,14;,851 115.223.270.315 2.3665 2,336`5`5 c„'Ror "'�� "o SIS.5576.104,581 041:7 0�.215f688 2'0x8'9 2020/21 -gJi'a;964 39,916 $19.133.387.718 3.4694 .5475 4v9,968-,4.18;588 510.529.423.638 1 ngag 1.1506 S14,832,639,45 515.679.968.424 2..m 2.3655 U"64,130,916 519.133.387.718 0171.4 0.2465 29s�6,153 2021/22 519.707.389.350 3.4604 47 610,36,,16;,644 510.845.306.347 1 nom,]] 11 $15,425,939,116 � 516150.36-477 2.3655 2.3655 $18,786,696,153 519.70-389.350 02604 0.2367 2929F21 2022/23 $�„999 $20,101,537.13 3.4604 1 3.5475 $18 5154 8;8 $11.062,212,474 •.^�14 1.1506 $16,042,976,681 ' $16.473.374,827 2.3655 2.3655 $19338,163,999 520.101.537.137 93401 0.2272 392IQ.2 2023/24 c,n i 1�<nn ccn<nn ccnA 520.503.567.880 4604 I 3:5475 cl 1,2;3,116,545 511.283.456.723 33 T1506 516.802.842.324 9 2.3655 ( _ 520.50356-880 0;3401 11111 Source: Indian River County Office of Management and Budget. As shown in table 6.9, the county has a Municipal Service Taxing Unit (MSTU) and an emergency services district, each with a separate millage. Changes to the Capital Improvements Program All County revenue sources except "Other Sources” are expected to increase at a rate of 2.5% through Fiscal Year 2022/23 2023/24 and all County revenue sources except for Judgements, Fines & Forfeitures are projected to be above what was previously forecasted in the prior year's Capital Improvements Program. With respect to the "Other Sources" funds, the decreasing yearly amount is due to uncertainty in grant funds, as that funding source is dependent on a number of factors including but not limited to economic conditions, and the competitiveness of grant applications. With this year's update, some projects have had their timeframes extended and some have had their funding sources changed as priorities have shifted, and projects previously underfunded have been designated to receive additional projected funding from sources that have become available. This includes projected increased revenue from assessments and user fees, gas taxes, various impact fees, and developer funded construction projects due to projected increased development activity and continually improving market conditions. While some project time frames have been extended, none of the extensions will impact development project concurrency reservations. By extending the timeframe of transportation projects, the County can utilize its limited resources to complete priority concurrency related projects within the overall capital improvements program. In effect, the County needs to delay some projects so that other projects will remain fundable and so that additional priority projects maybe funded. By funding necessary projects and other priority projects, and by extending the time frames for other projects, the County is maintaining a financially feasible capital improvements element. As allowed by state law, the County can consider the additional capacity to be produced by those anticipated nearer term roadway improvement projects as being available now for concurrency 283 purposes. As such, a development project impacting a deficient link can proceed despite the deficient link, where a roadway improvement project for the deficient link will be under construction no later than three years after issuance of the first building permit for the development project. Needs Assessment' Based on public facility requirements identified in the other comprehensive plan elements, this needs assessment identifies the capital improvements required to provide sufficient infrastructure to meet proposed levels of service for existing and new development. For purposes of the CIE, a capital improvement is a substantial facility (land, building or major equipment) that costs at least $100,000 and may be paid for in phases. Table 6.10 identifies capital improvement needs through fiscal year2022�232023/24 for conservation & aquifer recharge, emergency services, general services, law enforcement & corrections, recreation and open space, stormwater management, sanitary sewer and potable water, solid waste, transportation, and public schools. Appendix A provides a detailed list of projects associated with each of the comprehensive plan elements as well as those projects associated with individual department capital improvements programs. Not included in Appendix A are projects associated with the Public School Facilities Element. Those projects are found in Appendix C. Detailed capital improvement schedules, which list each improvement project, are provided in each applicable Comprehensive Plan Element or within individual master plans for the respective governmental service. Table 6.10: Future Capital Improvement Expenditures for Indian River County & Indian River Coun School District Element or Category 3918AA 2019/20 2"940-2QLOL21 } 2021/22 20211A22 r 383b/232022/23 2023/24 Total Coastal Management $5.000,000 $20,000.000 L0 LO LQ $25,000.000 Conservation & A uifer Rechar a 9 g $1,Y� 649,3811 $3,439,398 $943,880 1 425 0 $1;830;080 $1,325.000 ,$1800 $2.3_5.000 $1,635,009 $2,725,000 $6;594381 $11,239.398 Emergency Services $4 ,969,635 635 ","',"5 $7.421.635 $5;895;080 $4,650,000 $1-;875,$80 $2.145.000 x_,670-,800 $2,700,000 $3•,0;$,000 $2.300.000 $20 --o 673,6315 $19.216,635 General Services/Facilities Management $12,089,,18.2 $7.850.000 $3,030,000 $2.575.000 $1;550,880 $3,375,000 $338,$00 2 485 000 $530,009 $1,775,000 $18,059 1$3 $18.060.000 Law Enforcement &Corrections$1,500,000$4,655,000 &899 $34 200 000 $0 $2,650,000 $3,200,000 $1,500;808 $4,655,900 $0 $9,69-5,,080 $9.005.000 Recreation & Open Space $4,962.878 c1 1 n1z $3,nn19 9 $1,161,188 $2.080.000 $9,000 $900,000 $1,100,000 $850.000 $9,803,7-19 $11.989.997 Sanitary Sewer & Potable Water $17,772,723 $19,1.61,0 $14,535,279 $1-0;894;888 $17.840,126 $11.1,2x`,000 $4.440188 $4;300,008 $27.042.233 $63289158 $81,630.549 Solid Waste $6,400,009 $1.570,000 $3,500,000 $4.430.000 50 000$7,000,000 $8 $1,250,000 $9,900,000 $14,300.000 Community Development Department Indian River County Adopted December , 2019, Ordinance 2019-_ 32 284 Table 6.10: Future Capital Improvement Expenditures for Indian River County & Indian River Coun School District Element or Category 2048i!9-2019/20 20040-2020/21 3020F2.1- 2021/22 202442 2022/23 202V23 2023/24 Total Stormwater Management $9,4� $3,300,0004 ,3w,000 $2,290,000 $3,613,069 $200,000 63,650,928 $200,000 23-,_$6,,7-10 $15,425,000 Transportation $41,404 $401 1nc�5 997 nnn $38� ezc 15Gzz8,4ccn 48 $$334,28,5722 cco86 $5544,0A9668 cnn n�88 $17,000,0000C $172586,450 $184,302,985 Total enc ave $97 767T63+u� $77,106,464 $94,920,846 35v,0n9�'Stl $65,533698 $58,092,655 $73,055,156 346 $58,892,233 $335 ,843,326 $390,169,564 Public School Facilities* $,�T $12,004,666 $�2,6§6,691 $14,969,041 $,n$ n 117,2LO5 $15,651,343 $15,561,487 � $23,106,775 $16,980,919 $18,576,087 ------ $84,307,912 *The School District of Indian River County has the fiscal responsibility for capital improvement expenditures for public school facilities. Figure 6.18 graphically displays the forecasted capital improvements expenditures for the County during the next five fiscal years., As indicated, the sum of the total projected costs for each of the elements for the five year period is $335,813,326$390,169,564. Some public facilities, such as public education and health systems, are provided countywide, but are not the fiscal responsibility of the County. The County, however, is required by state statutes to provide some funds to the Indian River County Health Department (IRCHD). Consistent with state law, the Secretary of the Florida Department of Health appoints the administrator of the IRCHD with the concurrence of the Board of County Commissioners. The IRCHD maintains its financial records, and prepares its own financial report separate from the county. In the Public School Facilities Element of the County's comprehensive plan, there is an analysis and description of public schools. Based on general locational criteria for public schools, it is assumed that any new facilities which may be constructed in the County by 2022/232023/24 will be located within existing infrastructure service areas or designated expansion areas. Therefore, those systems may be considered to be adequately served by appropriate infrastructure. 285 Figure 6.18: Future Capital Improvement Expenditures $60,000,000 $50,000,000 $40,000,000 $30,000,000 $20,000,000 $10,000,000 $o is FY 2019/20 FY 2020/21 FY 2021/22 FY 2022/23 FY 2023/24 oCoastal Managernant GConservation and Aquifer Recharge oEmergenq Services ■Faclilles Hanagernant oLaw Erdorcemerit mParksaWReaeaBon mSantary Sewer B Potable Water OSoidWaste 09tomnwatar Management ciTransponation Source: Indian River County Office of Management and Budget. Fiscal Assessment This section examines the County's ability to fund the capital improvements listed in table 6. 10, with the exception of public school facilities, and assesses whether sufficient revenue will be available within the existing budget framework utilized by the County to fund the needed improvements at the time that those improvements will be required. This assessment process consists of forecasting future revenue receipts and comparing those receipts to anticipated expenditures. With this process, it is possible to quantify annual revenue surpluses and shortfalls, providing a basis for examining opportunities for financing needed capital improvements. The expenditure estimates include operating costs. For the public school facilities listed in table 6. 10, the School District of Indian River County is responsible for funding the capital improvements. The School District's adopted "Summary of Capital Improvements Program" (Appendix C) and "Summary of Estimated Revenue" (Appendix D) provide a detailed review of the financial feasibility of the School District's Five Year Capital Plan. Projected Expenditures Table 6.11 shows the County's projected expenditures for fiscal years 92019/2020 through X22022/2023. By fiscal year 2022232023/24, the County is forecasted to have annual 286 expenditures totaling $371,475,191$397,462,983. In FY 2022/232023/24, the category projected to have the largest expenditures is the Public Safety category. For the five-year period beginning in fiscal year 20184 92019/20 and ending in fiscal year_2.0 32023/24, the County's expenditures are forecast to decrease by 6.560,;4.98%. Table 6.11: Indian River County Overall General Expenditures Projection Summary FY 20449 2019/20 2nd 2020/21 202W2l 2021/22 202i42 2022/23 2922423 2023/24 General Gov't. Services $69,071,904$55,287,000$55,449,000$55,nar 66 277 888 62 464 000 64 761 000 432,,0 $65,406,000 $56;985;888 $66,269_000 Public Safety $1 A l ,1-58;$66 $186338;089 S 109,7774;800 008 $11�' 1moo^ 109 035 731 $111,249,000 $i 10 193,000 $116,567,000 $114,242.000 Physical Environment c87,n�v�-vm. r $92.370,545 $8 93;888. $85,347,279 $73,560,00 $84,703,126 $73,69:7,069 $72,993,188 $-Q,''w- ^-o $103,364,233 Transportation no d $67,479.332 $62,228,650$56, $66 205 448 2 Gr� 92 JELL76 572 $61,455,986$56,996388 $83 566 968 47 204 000 Economic Environment cn c� $503 942 $464,088 $517,000 $4761000 $530,000 $488,000 1L43 000 $588;888 $557.000 Human Services $9;076,-548 $9,715,152 $9 3A-3,@88 $9,958,000 $9,536;888 $10,207,000 $9;774;888 $10,462,000 $4&018,000 $10,724,000 Culture/Recreation 23 672 718 $24,39:7,944 JEJ2L50 119 $24,066,88 $16,484,000 $26,128,000 $15,664,000 $25,165,0009 $15,983,000 Debt Service $5,541,051 � a c�80 a c�T $ n��o 3 $5 050 341 $3.518,315 $483 000 $482,750 $486750 Other $40,087,996 $97,904,900 $37;691888 $41,099;888 $38;832,008 $43 875 508 37 691 000 iiLQ90 000 44 972 000 $38.633,000 TOTAL c397 ccs mn �"'�-'� $417 981 157 $389 855 nn9 414 200 161 $968,572,234 JR&L2=7 698 $976,549,899 410 656 906 wl nuc 191 �'.'-.-'.'_ 397 462 983 Source: Indian River County Office of Management and Budget. Earmarked Projected Expenditures Table 6.12 identifies the projected expenditures for the water, sewer, and solid waste enterprise funds for fiscal years 2018/192019/20 through 202X232023/24. Those expenditures include operating expenses and other expenses for each year. According to law, all revenues from capacity charges must be spent on infrastructure improvements that benefit the payer of the capacity charge. Therefore, capacity charge revenue and expenditure amounts increase and decrease with development. For that reason, forecasting capacity charge revenues and expenditures is difficult. That system, however, ensures that new development will not reduce levels of service below County minimums. 287 Table 6.12: Projected Expenses for Water, Sewer, and Solid Waste Fiscal Year Potable Water & Sanitary Sewer Solid Waste 291849 2019/20 $50 993, 94 54 889 737 $22,281-,245--$17.807.578 2019,429 2020/21 $54,815,90-0-15 2 580 279 $19-77 �-,A98- 21 074 000 402041-2021/22 $59,639-999- 56 836 126 "i-,6gg0 17 110,000 2.921,122 2022/23 $48 gq;gg� 44 411 188 Q" '�,- n � 18 737 000 242W23-2023/24 $42-895,000•$68.012 233 $1 39;999- 24,924200Q Source: Indian River County Office of Management and Budget. In FY 2n�2023/24, the forecast expenses for potable water and sanitary sewer services are expected to be $42,895,000$68,412,233. That is andeeFease increase of 15.88-%0 25.51% from the FY 2019,1192019/20 forecast expenses ofQ50�94$54,889,737. Table 6.12 shows that, in FY29224-23 2023/24, the projected expenses for solid waste services are expected to be x,000$24,924,000. That is an deer -ease of 21.320 39.96% from the FY 2018/19,2019/20 projected figure of $22,281,-2,M$17,807,578. Operating Cost Proiections Table 6.13 provides forecasts of overall operating costs for the County for fiscal years 2018,119 2019/20 through 2822,1232023/24. In fiscal year 2922/232023/24, the County is forecast to incur approximately $284,848;875$299,937,750 in operating costs. Based on the figures shown intTable 6.13, the county's operating costs are forecast to increase 8.3 80748.54% between 20184 92019/20 and 2022/23,2023/24. Table 6.13: Indian River ounty Overall Operating Cost Projections Fiscal Year Total Operating Costs 241-8/-19-2019/20 c26 M7 276 338 018 2049/29-2020/21 $268,244,989: 281 588 315 2022041-2021/22 c274 823,5^24- 285.504 000 'n'—P=_' 2022/23 $27 9 $292.629 750 292?/2� 2023/24 $284048..875-$299 937 750 Source: Indian River County Office of Management and Budget Projected Debt Capacity Debt Financing is one way that the county has provided for its capital facility needs. The primary rationale for providing capital facilities through indebtedness is that it spreads the cost of a facility over its useful life and thus is paid for by those who will use the facility. Table 6.14 identifies the amount of revenue that the County can raise by issuing revenue bonds. Those bonds can be issued without a public vote. That table identifies the County's bonding capacity for 10, 20, and 30 years. As table 6.14 indicates, the County's available bonding capacity for a 10 year issue is $222,800,000, while its bonding capacity for a 30 year issue is $488,800,000. Table 6.14: Indian River ounty Estimated A'bili to Raise Bonds Without A Public Vote Ten Years Twenty Years Thirty Years Pledge Sources (Bond Interest Rate @ (Bond Interest Rate (Bond Interest Rate @ 24"0 1.40%) 1.80%) 2.0% Half Cent Sales Tax $84,199;899 1222-0-0-00 $146,700;000 $166,500,000 $1-909,-000 $226,300,000 Gas Taxes $36;980;009 16Q-200 000 $97,400,000 $108 000 000 $113,000,0 $126,500,000 Tourist Tax $18,200,000 19 600 000 $-31,300,000 35 200 00047 $48,909,000 200 000 County Revenue Program $3,190,080 $4,000,090 First Guaranteed Entitlement $1,8gg_ggQ-1 900 000 $3400,000 $4 600 000 County Revenue Program Second Guaranteed S3,7A8,A00 $6;400;999 $8300,000 Entitlement $3,900,000 $7,100,000 9 500 000 Sub -Total $1b4,700,908 $176,100,000 $284,900,000 1 $320 200 000 $358;990;990 $414,100.,000 Possible Pledge Sources Franchise Fees $39;699,000 $42,200 000 $67,800,000 $75,700,000 $88300;009 $101,600,000 Road Impact Fees $1,83AA;A99 20 900 000 $31,700,000 K620 -0-0001!i $41,40Q,000 8 900 000 Sub -Total $58,190,000 $63,100,000 $99,500,000 $112,400,000 $129;900;000 $150,500,000 TOTAL $232,800,M $239 200000 $384,400,000 $432,600,000 $488,800,000 $564,600,000 *Rates are comparable term AAA rated municipal bond yields as of SPNP-B189/25/2019. Source: Indian River County Office of Management and Budget. Debt Service Obligations In table 6.15, the County's debt service obligations for current and anticipated bond issues are summarized. Debt service is payment of .principal and interest on obligations resulting from the issuance of bonds. As table 6.15 indicates, the County's major anticipated outstanding debts are for water and sewer revenue bonds, environmentally sensitive land acquisition bonds, and spring training facility revenue bonds. 289 290 Table 6.15 Indian River County Bond Schedule FY Ending "'^'^ ,:eF Environmentally Reve P.fanding Sensitive Land Bends Acquisition Water & Sewer Revenue Refunding Bonds Spring Training Facility Revenue Bonds 2009 Sefies 3.6 2015 Series 1.66% X379-889 $20,369,000 2015 Series 1.65% $7,170,000 2001 Series 4.87% $16,810,000 1nteFeSl $784A0 $324-1-39 $85.994 &N4,740 $? kAA 888 $350-088 T-0+81 00 PA ] 9/ n�� ' p�66,7/cO/1�/ .tnp �tC C12'f� 'fnn�p � Qe �t T�rT�J��pS�tlV �Q�� InteFes4 �'���3?p'�V�tltl ��pC7'tltl�Sp'C�tl�tl C7''1n[�.QnoQnwQ TT__..__1' Tat6 ��� pOt�f Q�Y�/tl(i�'tl��TpJ�O.Tp00�0 �/��� 204.9 Balanee Q` 1 t'] I C npnw QJ'1"1"�T000 �TT000 T1000'OVtl Interest 5363-730 319041-7- 12 64 $52,371 $25:7:7 1 o'T 209 238 �t c nnn &2444 -,QW Principal 2w &4227-999 4298 000 $1,042,000 $64-5-_000-$290,000 Total 84^� „7,81,, 4 41 64 $1,094,371 $8;2-163. 499 238 2020 Balance &-7269,400-$Z970,000 $2,132,000 $4-465-098 5 Interest $459 AA0 $120,649-5A-9302 $35,178 $234-8-75 194 013 Principal $1- 43A;908 $4-298-988- 2 970 000 $1 058 000 563Q888 305 0 0 Total 5?-88A�A0 cA ^� -.;-7647 3 019 302 $1,093,178 178 $874.535- 499 013 2021 Balance 36378 9A8 $3978490-$0 $1,074,000 &3444,000-$3,560,000 Interest 0 949-38? $17,721 5199749- 178 000 Principal- 53-978-989 $1,074,000 &3",400-$305 000 Total &34490-- $1,091,721 49--'n0- 483 00 2022 Balance $4;98;888 $0 $0 $3-3}0-008 3 255 000 2023 Interest Qv ;808 c "�, r3 30n� 162 750 Principal 388 8A8 5328 008$320,000 Total 511� $495-388- 482 75 Balance U-1348;889 53-00400- 2 —935M0 Interest 367 888 S 159,590- 146 750 Principal 51 348-0A8 &349,400-1340,000 2024 Total $4W,-500-,$486.750 Balance $3-858.888 2 595,000 Interest $1-42 588- 129 75 2025 Principal $333-099 $355 000 Total $497409 4 4 750 Balance P—,44,400-$1,24_0000 Interest Q' ^4'38 $112,000 Principal $375,000 2026 Total $499,:750-1487,000 Balance $?-18,889. 1 865 000 2027 Interest 586 000 $93,250 290 Source: Indian River County Office of Management and Budget. Fiscal Assessment Summary This section provides an analysis of the County's revenues and expenditures for its capital improvement needs for the five-year period beginning in FY 24M/�2019/20 and ending in FY 22332023/24. While Appendix A details all of the capital improvement projects for the next five fiscal years for each individual comprehensive plan element by cost, timeframe, and revenue source(s), Table 6.7 provides general revenue projections for the County through fiscal year 2023/24. As shown in Table 6.7, the County will generate $1,897,999,62-5--_$2,031,428.,904.50 in revenues from general funds, enterprise funds, and internal funds from fiscal year 20184 9 2019/20 to fiscal year 2.0 2 2023/24. Sources of those funds include sales taxes, property taxes, grants, impact fees, and other revenues. The funding needed for the capital improvements listed within Appendix A will come from that$1,897,999,624$2,031,428,904.50. Overall, the County will have enough revenue to cover the costs associated with the five year capital improvements program. For all projects contained within the County's Capital Improvements project list, the total estimated cost is $335,413,326 $389,169,564 for the next five fiscal years. This is 291 Table 6.15 Indian River County Bond Schedule FY Ending WateF& Sewer Environmentally Revenue n.,.. D,efiinding. Sensitive Land Bends Acquisition Water & Sewer Revenue Refunding Bonds Spring Training Facility Revenue Bonds 2099 SeFies 3. 2015 Series 1.66% $368888 5203691000 2015 Series 1.65% $7170000 2001 Series 4.87% $16,810,000 Principal $398-980- 390 000 Total $496,490-$483,250 Balance $1-738-888 1 475 0 0 Interest $86588 3 750 Princi al "W490-1410,000 Total $496, -NO -1483.750 2028 Balance X328-888- 1 0 5 Interest W,400-153,250 Principal $430,000 Total $496,000-11a3_250 2029 Balance U90400-$635 000 Interest $44J,5040431,750 Principal $433-888- 455.000 Total $499,509-11M 750 2030 Balance $435,0004180,000 000 Interest $2a-, 9 000 Principal $43388$180,000 2031 Total $436--38- 189 000 Balance $0 Source: Indian River County Office of Management and Budget. Fiscal Assessment Summary This section provides an analysis of the County's revenues and expenditures for its capital improvement needs for the five-year period beginning in FY 24M/�2019/20 and ending in FY 22332023/24. While Appendix A details all of the capital improvement projects for the next five fiscal years for each individual comprehensive plan element by cost, timeframe, and revenue source(s), Table 6.7 provides general revenue projections for the County through fiscal year 2023/24. As shown in Table 6.7, the County will generate $1,897,999,62-5--_$2,031,428.,904.50 in revenues from general funds, enterprise funds, and internal funds from fiscal year 20184 9 2019/20 to fiscal year 2.0 2 2023/24. Sources of those funds include sales taxes, property taxes, grants, impact fees, and other revenues. The funding needed for the capital improvements listed within Appendix A will come from that$1,897,999,624$2,031,428,904.50. Overall, the County will have enough revenue to cover the costs associated with the five year capital improvements program. For all projects contained within the County's Capital Improvements project list, the total estimated cost is $335,413,326 $389,169,564 for the next five fiscal years. This is 291 719.15% of the overall general fund revenues for the same time period. Concurrency Management Plan To ensure that level -of -service standards are maintained, it is necessary to have a system in place that provides the criteria for measuring facility capacity, assessing development demand on applicable facilities, and monitoring service levels for applicable facilities. That system will set the parameters for issuing development orders consistent with level -of -service standards. While this concurrency management plan sets policies and establishes a process, the specific application of this system is through the County's land development regulations. As per state requirements, those regulations define the details of the concurrency management system and establish its administrative requirements. The major purpose of the concurrency management system is to detail the specifics of implementing the County's level -of -service standards. For that reason, the concurrency management system must apply to all development activity in the County. The system must then identify the applicable standards for each facility, the geographic scope of each facility, and the method of monitoring facility capacity changes. Most importantly, this system must specify when facilities are considered available. Project Applicability All development orders issued by the County and identified below must comply with the concurrency management plan and meet level -of -service standards. Development orders are County approvals for construction and/or land development activity. Specifically, development orders consist of the following: comprehensive plan amendments, rezonings, site plan approvals, preliminary plat approvals, development of regional impact (DRI) approvals, planned development preliminary approvals, and building permit approvals for multi --family projects. Within Indian River County, the impact from the construction of a single family home on an existing subdivision platted lot or legally created single-family parcel will constitute a de minimus impact on public facilities and thus be exempt from the concurrency requirement. Concurrency traffic impacts for single-family homes will be accounted for through tracking single-family trips and an annual traffic count update of the County's Concurrency Management System. Single — family trips tracked through this accounting system will be considered in development project traffic studies. Service Standards Level -of -service standards for concurrency related facilities are established in this plan for the following facilities: sanitary sewer, potable water, solid waste, stormwater management, recreation, 292 public schools, and transportation. Those are explained in detail in the applicable comprehensive plan elements. For each facility, level -of -service is a measure of the relationship between demand for the service and the capacity of the facility. Capacity, however, is measured differently for each type of facility. Table 6.16 identifies both the capacity and demand measures for each public facility. Those measures are addressed in detail, and existing capacities are identified in the applicable Comprehensive Plan Elements. Table 6.16: Service Level Measures for Concurrency Related Facilities Public Facility Category Specific Facility Capacity Measure Demand Measure Geographic Scope Transportation Roadway Volume of cars Peak Season/Peak Affected Roadways accommodated over time Direction/Peak Hour Trips Sanitary Sewer Treatment Plant Treatment design capacity Generation Rate (GPD) Service Area Potable Water Treatment Plant Treatment design capacity Generation Rate (GPD) Service Area Solid Waste Landfill Volume in active cell (cubic Generation Rate (tons per Entire County yards) capita per year) Recreation Parks Acres of park land Acres of parks per Entire County thousand population Stormwater Management Drainage Volume of water Volume of stormwater Basin conveyances outfalling for design storm Education* Public Schools (K- Number of students Enrolled Students/ Future Service Area 12) 1 accommodated over time I Student Generation *Limited to participating Schools owned and operated by the Indian River County School District Concurrency requires that each facility within the geographic scope of a proposed project's impact area have sufficient capacity to accommodate the project's demand. If that capacity is not available, the project cannot be approved. The principal function of the concurrency management system then is to provide a mechanism whereby demand and capacity measures can be compared on a project by project basis. Table 6.16 provides the criteria for establishing a demand to capacity comparison for a proposed project. While most of the characteristics are self-explanatory, one needs clarification; that is the geographic scope for the traffic public facility category. For concurrency purposes, affected roadways are those roadways impacted by a project's traffic. Regardless of size, all projects impact the roadway on which the project fronts. In addition, other roadways further removed from the project may be impacted. For concurrency purposes, two lane roadways which are assigned 8 or more peak hour/peak season/peak direction project trips and four or more lane roadways that are assigned 15 or more peak hour/peak season/peak direction project trips are considered impacted roadways. 293 For transportation concurrency related facilities, level -of -service standards are applied to all impacted roadways. Those level -of -service standards range from A to F and are associated with peak hour/peak season/peak direction trips. Demand Demand is an important component of the concurrency management system. Essentially, demand is a measure of facility use. When compared to facility capacity, demand can indicate the level -of -service for the facility. As depicted in Table 6.16, demand can be measured quantitatively for each public facility category. While the demand function for each facility consists of applying a rate to the number of facility users, estimation of total demand is more complex. For concurrency management purposes, demand can be divided into three types: existing, committed, and projected. Each must be considered separately for purposes of concurrency management. Existing Demand Existing demand is simply the current level of use for a facility. For a roadway, it is the number of peak hour/peak season/peak direction trips; for a school, it is the number of full-time enrolled students; for water and wastewater treatment plants, it is the existing flow volume measured in gallons per day. Those figures are included within applicable plan elements. Existing demand then reflects the use of a facility by the current population. When compared to capacity, existing demand can show if the facility has unused capacity or if it is functioning over capacity. Existing demand, however, is not static. As population increases and dwelling units come on-line, existing demand increases. Those increases in existing demand can be identified through facility use measurements. For example, regular traffic counts done on roads or treatment plant flow records are examples of facility use measurements indicating existing demand levels. As existing demand levels for facilities are updated, committed demand levels must be reduced if projects representing committed demand have come on-line. Committed Demand Committed demand is a measure of the impact that approved development projects with reserved capacity will have on facilities. When added to existing demand for a facility, the committed demand for that facility will produce a more accurate estimate of unused capacity. That estimate of unused capacity represents the amount of capacity that can realistically be allocated to new projects. Committed demand must be determined by identifying all projects for which capacity has been reserved through issuance of initial concurrency certificates which are still valid. Then the specific facilities that will be impacted by those projects with reserved capacities must be determined; those 294 facilities will be roadways and the landfill, and they may be treatment plants, drainage conveyances, and recreation facilities. Finally, the total demand on each facility attributable to committed demand will be determined. Applicable elements of the plan identify the rates to be applied to each project to determine facility demand. Traffic volumes, for example, can be derived by applying a trip rate to the size of the project. Sanitary sewer and potable water both have rates of 250 gallons per day per equivalent residential unit. Other public facility rates are discussed fully in their applicable Comprehensive Plan Element. Like existing demand, committed demand must be determined on a facility by facility basis. For example, both existing demand and committed demand must be determined for each major roadway, each school, each treatment plant, each major drainage conveyance, and the active cell in the landfill. Also; like existing demand, committed demand estimates must be modified as projects are completed; committed demand estimates must also be modified as new development orders are approved and old development orders are terminated. Proiected Demand The third type of demand is projected demand. This consists of two types. One is non- committed/non-reserved, single-family lot demand for all subdivisions, while the other is new project demand. Non-committed/non-reserved single-family lot projected demand to the facility impacts associated with construction on individual single-family lots in platted subdivisions and construction on legally established individual single-family unplatted lots and acreage will constitute a de minimus impact on public facilities and thus be exempt from concurrency review. Single-family home traffic impacts will be accounted for through tracking single-family trips for use in development project traffic studies and annual traffic count updates. The second type of projected demand is new project demand. For each new project, demand estimates must be made on a facility by facility basis. Only if sufficient available capacity exists for each facility to be impacted can the project be approved and a development order issued. Upon issuance of a development order, the estimated impacts on each facility would be considered as committed demand. Availability of Capacity Facility capacity can be assessed two different ways. First, facility capacity can be determined by facilities that are existing and available; examples would be existing treatment plants and existing roadways with a set number of lanes. The second manner for assessing facility capacity is to consider 295 both existing, in -the -ground facilities as well as facility expansions or new facilities which are programmed but not yet existing. As part of the concurrency review process, the capacity of existing, in -the -ground facilities will be considered in all cases. Programmed facilities will be considered in assessing capacity for each public facility category when the following conditions are met: ➢ For sanitary sewer, potable water, solid waste and drainage facilities: 1. A development order or permit is issued subject to the condition that, at the time of the issuance of a certificate of occupancy or its functional equivalent, the necessary facilities and services are in place and available to serve the new development; or 2. At the time the development order or permit is issued, the necessary facilities and services are guaranteed in an enforceable development agreement to be in place and available to serve new development at the time of the issuance of a certificate of occupancy or its functional equivalent. ➢ For parks and recreation facilities: 1. At the time the development order or permit is issued, the necessary facilities and services are in place or under actual construction; or 2. A development order or permit is issued subject to the condition that, at the time of the issuance of a certificate of occupancy or its functional equivalent, the acreage for the necessary facilities and services to serve the new development is dedicated or acquired by the local government, or funds in the amount of the developer's fair share are committed; and a. A development order or permit is issued subject to a condition that the necessary facilities and services needed to serve the new development are in place or under actual construction not more than one year after issuance of a certificate of occupancy or its functional equivalent; or b. At the time the development order or permit is issued, the necessary facilities and services are the subject of a binding executed agreement which requires the necessary facilities and services to serve the new development to be in place or under actual construction not more than one year after issuance of a certificate of occupancy or its functional equivalent; or c. At the time the development order or permit is issued, the necessary facilities 296 and services are guaranteed in an enforceable development agreement, to be in place or under actual construction not more than one year after issuance of a certificate of occupancy or its functional equivalent. ➢ Transportation supply (capacity). Transportation supply shall be determined on a segment by segment basis. For concurrency purposes, all segments on the county's thoroughfare plan shall be considered. Capacity for segments will be based either on FDOT's generalized capacity tables or individual segment capacity studies approved by the public works director pursuant to the criteria specified in Chapter 952, Traffic. Transportation supply for each segment is: 1. The segment's existing peak hour, peak season, peak direction capacity; or 2. The segment's new roadway capacity if facility expansion for the segment is proposed and if. a. At the time a development order or permit is issued, the necessary facilities and services are in place or under construction; or b. A development order or permit is issued subject to a condition that the facility expansion needed to serve the new development is included in the county's adopted five-year schedule of capital improvements and is scheduled to be in place or under actual construction not more than three years after issuance of the project's first building permit or its functional equivalent. The schedule of capital improvements may recognize and include transportation projects included in the first three years of the adopted Florida Department of Transportation five year work program. In order to apply this provision to a facility expansion project, the Capital Improvements Element must include the following policies: i. The estimated date of commencement of actual construction and the estimated date of project completion. ii. A provision that a plan amendment is required to eliminate, defer, or delay construction of any road or mass transit facility or service which is needed to maintain the adopted level of service standard and which is listed in the five-year schedule of capital improvements (for Indian River County, this is included in Policy 1.2 of this Element); or 3. The segment's new roadway capacity if, at the time a development order or permit is issued, the facility is the subject of a binding executed agreement which requires the facility to be in place or under actual construction no more than three years after the issuance of the project's first building permit or its functional equivalent; or 297 4. The segment's new roadway capacity if, at the time a development order or permit is issued, the facility is guaranteed in an enforceable development agreement, to be in place or under actual construction not more than three years after issuance of a building permit or its functional equivalent. 5. The segment's new roadway capacity if facility expansion for the segment is the subject of a proportionate fair -share agreement. In such case, the segment capacity increase reflected in the proportionate fair share agreement shall be available only to the party or parties to the proportionate fair share agreement. ➢ For school facilities: A residential development order or permit shall be issued only if the needed capacity for the particular service area is available in one or more contiguous service areas. Regulation No development order shall be issued for any project where the project's demand in conjunction with existing demand and committed demand will exceed the capacity of a facility at the service level established in this plan. Level -of -service analysis will be undertaken during the review of each project for which development order approval is required. Monitoring System To effectively implement the concurrency requirement, it is necessary to maintain an estimate of available capacity for each public facility subject to level -of -service requirements. By maintaining an accurate and current available capacity estimate for each facility, projected demand from development applications can be compared to the available capacity for the facility to determine if the project can be approved. The purpose of the monitoring program is to maintain a current estimate of available capacity for each facility. With the exception of public schools, the monitoring system portion of the concurrency management plan is maintained by the county's planning division. Effective July 1, 2008, the School District initiated and now maintains the monitoring system portion of the concurrency management plan for public schools. Using a network computer system and database management software, records were developed and are maintained for each specific facility. Based upon information in the specific comprehensive plan elements, total capacity figures for each applicable facility are maintained in database files established for each public facility category. Capacity figures are modified as facilities are expanded or as criteria specified in the availability of capacity section are met, thereby allowing a programmed expansion to be considered for capacity determination purposes. Through contact with other county departments, planning staff are able to modify capacity estimates as soon as facility characteristics are changed. 298 Table 6.17 depicts the general structure of the monitoring system database file for each public facility category. That table shows that available capacity for each specific facility is a function of total capacity less existing demand and less committed demand. The demand section of this concurrency management plan identifies the methodology for assessing demand. Table 6.17: Monitoring S stem Design Public Facility Specific Total Capacity Existing Demand Committed Demand Available Capacity Category Facilities Engineering Annually Compile quarterly ridership statistics for all fixed routes I MPO Annually Peak season/ peak Annual count (average) Volume estimated from I (Total Capacity) - (Existing Traffic Roadways direction/ peak (peak season/peak approved Development Demand) - (Committed Demand) Planning Annually hour (LOS D) direction/peak hour) Orders (DO) Annually Sanitary Sewer Treatment Design flows Existing flows Volume estimated from (Total Capacity) - (Existing School District Plants Add estimated demand for new projects to committed demand total upon issuance of DO pproved DO's Demand) - (Committed Demand) Potable Water Treatment Design flows Existing flows I olume estimated from (Total Capacity) - (Existing Plants approved DO's Demand) - (Committed Demand) Solid Waste Landfill Active cell design Active cell volume used I F olume estimated from (Total Capacity) - (Existing capacity approved DO's Demand) - (Committed Demand) Acres per thousand (Acres per thousand I population) X (projected (Total Capacity) - (Existing Recreation Parks Park Acreage population) X (existing population for approved Demand) - (Committed Demand) population) Do's) Drainage I olume of stormwater Drainage Volume Existing flows allowed to outfall for (Total Capacity) - (Existing conveyances approved DO's Demand) - (Committed Demand) Public Permanent Student Stations Annual Enrollment Students estimated from I approved residential (Total Capacity) - (Existing Education Schools 12 �" ) (FISH) Count E �) Development Orders) Demand - Committed Demand ) ( ) To implement the monitoring system, the following actions shown in table 6.18 will be necessary. Table 6.18: Monitoring System Tasks Action Responsible Department Timing Do quarterly traffic counts for thoroughfare plan roads to determine existing demand I Engineering Annually Compile quarterly ridership statistics for all fixed routes I MPO Annually Identify existing flows for each water and sewer treatment plant I Utilities Annually Estimate Landfill (active cell) volume used I Utilities Annually Estimate population and apply park standard to determine park existing demand Planning Annually Estimate existing flows for drainage conveyances Engineering Annually Enter data received from other departments into computer ( Planning Ongoing Do annual student counts (FTE) for public schools to determine existing demand I School District Annually Add estimated demand for new projects to committed demand total upon issuance of DO Planning Ongoing Maintain records of units/projects receiving a certificate of occupancy, maintain demand estimates from those units/projects, subtract estimated demand for those units/projects for committed demand once existing demand is updated Planning Ongoing Community Development Department Indian River County Adopted December , 2019, Ordinance 2019-_ 47 299 Applicability The concurrency management plan monitoring system I service measurement. It also provides the basis for asses capital improvements programming. By maintaining an capacity, the need for facility expansion can be recc incorporating the monitoring system into the capital im budgets can be prepared based on reliable information a applicability to more than just level -of - g facility expansion needs and therefore urate and up-to-date estimate of available ized before all capacity is used. By ovements programming process, capital valid estimates of need. 300 Goal, Objectives and Policies Goal It is the goal of Indian River County to provide needed c sound fiscal decision making. Objectives and Policies Objective 1: Construction of Capital Facilities By X2024, the county will have completed those ca replace obsolete or worn-out facilities, eliminate existing growth. tpital improvements through the use of improvements schedule projects that iencies or accommodate desired future Policy 1.1: The county shall maintain a five-year capital improvement program and pursuant to Section 163.3177(3)(b) F.S. evaluate and update that program every year to reflect existing and future public facility needs of the county. This capital improvement program will ensure that the plan is financially feasible and that the adopted level -of -service standards are achieved and maintained. Policy 1.2: The county and the School District shall and included within this element's adopted capital improv 163.3177(3)(b) F.S., the Capital Improvements Element wi identified in the Schedule of Capital Improvements is dE eliminated from the capital improvements program, and thi the level -of -service to deteriorate below the adopted mii facility, a comprehensive plan amendment will be reqs Improvements. The annual update of the capital improve] public hearing before the Board of County Commissioners Capital Improvements Element shall be transmitted to DE Policy 1.3: The county shall evaluate and prioritize its following criteria. These criteria are ranked in order of in ➢ Preservation of the health and safety of the ➢ Compliance with all mandates and prior co ➢ Elimination of existing deficiencies; ➢ Maintenance of adopted level -of -service A ➢ Provision of infrastructure concurrent with ➢ Protection of prior infrastructure investmer ➢ Consistency with the county plan and plan; ➢ Accommodation of new development and i ➢ Consistency with plans of state agencies public facilities within the local goverm rtake only those capital improvements nents program. Pursuant to Section . be reviewed every year. If any facility ayed or deferred in construction, or is delay, deferral, or elimination will cause mum level of service standard for the red to adjust the Schedule of Capital ent element shall be done with a single ad a copy of the ordinance amending the capital improvement projects based on portance. by eliminating public hazards; the impact of new development;. ts; of other agencies; edevelopment facility demands; water management districts that provide is jurisdiction; 301 ➢ Promotion of compact development by di areas; ➢ Demonstration of linkages between proje ➢ Utilization of the economies of scale and ➢ Reduction of operating costs; ➢ Adjustment for unseen opportunities, sith ing growth outside of urban service growth and facility location; ng of other improvements; and disasters. Policy IA: The county shall implement the policies of the Potable Water, Sanitary Sewer, and Solid Waste sub -elements of the Comprehensive Plan. Since these are enterprise account funded elements, capital expenditures identified in these elements shall be funded principally from revenues derived from the applicable systems. Policy 1.5: The county shall prioritize and implement the urograms identified in the Transportation, Recreation and Open Space, Stormwater Management, Conservation, and Future Land Use Elements of the Comprehensive Plan. Policy 1.6: The county shall not eliminate or reallocate budgeted appropriations for road improvement projects required to meet the adopted level -of -service standards unless the applicable projects will be constructed by other means and remain concurrent with the county's Schedule of Capital Improvements. Policy 1.7: The county shall continue to allocate funds I for the replacement and the renewal of infrastructure in an amount which will minimize the o erating costs of the infrastructure and maximize the life of the infrastructure. Policy 1.8: The county shall manage its long-term ratio of the debt service millage to the countywide Policy 1.9: The county hereby defines a capital exceeds $100,000. Polices: The Schedule of Capital Improvements including projects to eliminate existing deficiencies, to construct new facilities. obligation debt in such a manner that the ng millage does not exceed 20%. as an improvement with a cost that contain a mix of capital expenditures, de and replace existing facilities, and to Policy 1.11: The county shall maintain a procedure in its annual budget review requiring each county department to include in its annual budget request applicable expenditures as identified in the capital improvements program of the appropriate Comprehensive Plan Element as well as department's capital improvements. Policy 1.12: The county hereby adopts the 24' 9-2019-2020 through 22022 28232023-2024 Indian River County School District Five -Year Facilities V6k Plan. The Indian River County School District Five -Year Facilities Work Plan will be evaluated and updated annually to reflect existing and 302 future public school facility needs of the county. This School District Five -Year Facilities Work Plan is fmanc: service standard for public schools is achieved and main Through 2030, development in coastal high hazard areas intensity levels indicated on the current Future Land Use 1 Policy 2.1: The coastal high hazard area is defined as the zones for a category one hurricane. Policy 2.2: The county shall not increase land use density area, beyond that reflected in the county's current Future I Policy 2.2.3: The county shall make appropriations for to maintain the adopted level -of -service standards. ensure that the Indian River County feasible and that the adopted level -of - not increase beyond the density or of the county designated as evacuation intensity, in the coastal high hazard Use Map. in coastal high hazard areas only Policy 2.4: The county shall ensure that the replacement of infrastructure in the coastal high hazard area will be limited to maintaining the adopted level-of-sdvice standards. Policy 2.5: The county shall require that all developments Ind all single-family units in coastal high hazard areas fully pay the cost for required infrastructure improvements through impact fees, capacity charges, developer dedications, assessments, and contribu4ons. Policy 2.6: The county shall not use public funds to sub; development in coastal high hazard areas; however, restoration, or similar projects may be constructed. Through 2030, adopted levels -of -service will be Polices: The county hereby adopts the concurrency me element. The county shall maintain Land Development Re Management System, which implements the plan's concur with the concurrency management system of this plan and any development project where the impacts of such a p service on any facility below that facility's adopted minis increased density or intensity of urban is beach, shoreline access, resource for all concurrency facilities. gement system as described within this lation (LDR) Chapter 910, Concurrency ,icy management system. In accordance )R Ch. 910, the county will not approve ect would lower the existing level -of - level -of -service standard. Policy 3.2: The county shall approve development only iri accordance with the utility connection matrix identified in the Sanitary Sewer and Potable Water Sub -Elements. 303 Policy 3.3: The county shall, concurrent with the im infrastructure necessary to maintain the levels -of -service Comprehensive Plan. Where development is propose regulations but one or more. public facilities is/are oper applicant may at his expense make facility improvement improvements are consistent with county plans and recei` Policy 3.4: The county shall make land use decisions maintain adopted level -of -service standards. Policy 3.5: The county hereby adopts Concurrency Mana facilities that are established in the other Comprehensive ➢ Stormwater Management: The county hereby adopts the following level -of -service the unincorporated county: ➢ New development requiring major site I construct a complete drainage system to design rainfall event using the soil con curves. ➢ Post development runoff for any drainag runoff unless a maximum discharge rate h exceed that rate. If a maximum discharge development discharge may not exceed p: By 2023, all existing roadways in the county shall be im] standards: ➢ Minimum road crown elevation for resurfacing/rebuilding to the flood eleva event on local streets. ➢ The center two lanes of rebuilt roads must 10 year 24 hour storm event on Arterial a ➢ All drainage basins will meet the followii 10-Year/24 Hour Storm Event The county hereby adopts the following water quality le ➢ As a minimum, retention of the first one discharge. An additional 50% treatment Sebastian River and into the Indian Ri, outstanding Florida water, as required by act of new development, provide the dentified in the various elements of the and is consistent with all applicable ing at an inadequate service level, the to increase facility capacity when such county approval. on the planned availability of facilities to nt level -of -service standards for public Elements and which are stated below: for all new drainage systems within approval or subdivision platting shall igate the impacts of a 25 year/24 hour ation service type 2 modified rainfall basin shall not exceed pre -development ; been adopted and the discharge does not ate has not been adopted for a basin, post development discharge. to meet the following level -of -service isting roads shall be raised during resulting from the 2 year/24 hour storm at or above flood levels resulting from a Collector roads. level of service standard: ;1 -of -service standard: ich of rainfall is required prior to offsite required for all direct discharge into the ;r Lagoon due to its designation as an tate law. 304 ➢ Potable Water The following level -of -service standard is adopted for the be utilized for determining the availability of facility development: ➢ Countywide level -of -service standard of 25 unit. ➢ Solid Waste ty's potable water facilities, and shall acity and demand generated by a per day per equivalent residential The following level -of -service standard is adopted for solid waste facilities in the county, and shall be used as the basis for determining the availability of facili{y capacity and demand generated by a development: Countywide level -of -service standard of 2.2 tons or 3.67 cubic yards per capita for permanent plus weighted peak seasonal population per year. ➢ Sanitary Sewer The following level -of -service standard is adopted for the c be utilized for determining the availability of facility development: Countywide level -of -service standard of 25 unit with a peak monthly flow factor of 1.,' ➢ Recreation & Open Space The county adopts the following recreation level -of -cervi ➢ County wide level -of -service standard of 6 weighted peak seasonal population. ➢ Transportation The county adopts traffic circulation level -of -service s ➢ Level -of -Service "D" during peak hour, TRIP grant funded roads as well as all freeN the exception of the following two, which 20%. ry's sanitary sewer facilities, and shall acity and demand generated by a gallons per day per equivalent residential standard: 1 recreation acres/1,000 permanent plus rds as follows: season, peak direction conditions, on all y, arterial, and collector roadways, with ill operate at level of service "E" plus 27th Ave — South County Line to SR 60 43rd Ave — Oslo Road to 16th Street 305 ➢ Level -of -Service "D" plus 20% during conditions on the following roads until suc as specified below, is constructed. At such is constructed, the level of service for that season, peak direction conditions. CR 510 — 66th Avenue to US High 37th Street — US Highway 1 to Ind: widening or alternatively mitigated US 1 to 37�h Street) During the time period before major ca two roads, proposed major development commission or board of county commis roads may, based on a traffic study a] approved with conditions related to prov mitigate project impacts on one or both For SIS/Florida Intrastate Highway System roadways, and level of service "C" is adopted for urban areas. eak hour, peak season, peak direction time that a major capacity improvement, me that the major capacity improvement gad shall be "D" during peak hour, peak y 1 (scheduled for widening) River Boulevard (scheduled for extension of Aviation Boulevard from ty improvements are provided for these ects approved by the planning and zoning .ers that will impact either or both of the ved by the Public Works Director, be is for interim roadway improvements that of service "B" is adopted for rural areas, Policy 3.6: The county hereby adopts level -of -service standards for selected public facilities as follows: ➢ Correctional Facilities The county adopts the following correctional facilities level -of -service standard: ➢ County wide level -of -service standard of 4!.5 beds/1,000 permanent plus weighted peak seasonal population ➢ Fire/EMS The county adopts the following Fire/EMS level-of-sei ➢ County wide (excluding Indian River Stations per 1,000 permanent plus weig ➢ Law Enforcement The county adopts the following Law Enforcement level standard: res) level -of -service standard of .089 peak seasonal population =service standard: ➢ Unincorporated County level -of -service standard of 2.09 officers per 1,000 permanent plus weighted peak seasonal population 306 ➢ Libraries The county adopts the following Libraries level -of -service 'standards: ➢ County wide level -of -service standard ofd 580 building square feet per 1,000 permanent plus weighted peak seasonal pop, ➢ County wide level -of -service standard of permanent plus weighted peak seasonal pope ➢ County wide level -of -service standard of 0. weighted peak seasonal population ➢ County wide level -of -service standard of 0.2 permanent plus weighted peak seasonal pope ➢ Public Buildings ,200 library material items per 1,000 computers per 1,000 permanent plus library equipment items per 1,000 The county adopts the following Public Buildings level -of -service standard: ➢ County wide level -of -service standard of 1 199 building square feet per capita for permanent plus weighted peak seasonal ➢ Schools The county adopts the following Schools level -of -service Schools (School Service Areas): ➢ 100 percent of Florida Inventory of School Houses type (elementary, middle, and high). ➢ Transit The County adopts the following transit level -of -service si ➢ One-hour headways shall be maintained on Through 2030, new developments will bear a adopted level -of -service standards. capacity for each public school fixed transit routes. share of the cost required to maintain Policy 4.1: The county shall use impact fees, capacity charges, assessments, developer dedications and contributions, to pay for infrastructure improvements and services needed to satisfy future needs while maintaining adopted level -of -service standards. Policy 4.2: The county shall conduct research to identify new sources of revenue for funding capital improvement projects. 307 Through 2030, the county will ensure that it is able to facilities. Policy 5. The county shall not approve land use a consistent with the concurrency management system Policy 5.2: In the event that the planned capacity of applicants for development orders, the county shall developments in the following order of priority: ➢ Single-family units in existing platted subdivisi, ➢ Affordable housing projects ➢ New development orders permitting redevelops ➢ New development orders permitting new dei infrastructure expansion in exchange for future ➢ New development orders permitting new deveh s and Facilities and provide required services and requests unless those requests are its of this element. facilities is insufficient to serve all zle capital improvements to serve or on existing legal, buildable parcels ments where the applicant funds the bursement ;nts without developer participation Policy 5.3: The county shall extend facilities and service's to serve areas only within the existing Urban Service Area or as allowed by Policy 5.7 of the Potable Water Sub -Element and Policy 5.8 of the Sanitary Sewer Sub -Element of the Comprehensive Plan. Policy 5.4: The county shall coordinate with other local, entities to create an efficient capital improvements scl benefits while minimizing the financial burden of provi ➢ Reduction of overall capital and operating expo facilities; ➢ More efficient land use patterns and phasing; ➢ Reduction of overlapping, duplicating, and adm ➢ Implementation of adopted physical, social, and e, and federal agencies as well as private ile that provides the following general facilities and services: tures by the development of multi -use procedures; goals and policies in a least -cost manner; . ➢ Better coordination of public capital investment with private capital expenditures. Policy 5.5: The county shall continue utilizing enterprise fui ds for the provision of Sanitary Sewer, Potable Water, and Solid Waste facilities. The debt for enterprise funds is to be paid by user fees, capacity charges, and other appropriate sources. Policy The county shall finance the capital cost of non -enterprise fund supported public facilities (e.g., roads, stormwater management, and parks) from current revenue, bond issues, impact fees, capacity charges, assessments, and other appropriate sources. 308 Policy 5.7: The county shall use general obligation bonds and other sources to raise the funding required to provide those public facilities that cannot be constructed with user fees, revenue bonds, impact fees, capacity charges, or other dedicated revenue sources. Policy 5.8: Developments, which require public facility infrastructure improvements that will be financed by county debt, shall have their development orders conditioned on the issuance of the county debt or the substitution of a comparable amount of non -debt revenue. Policy 5.9: Pursuant to state law, the Schedule of Capital Improvements may be adjusted by ordinance and not deemed to be an amendment to the Comprehensive Plan when the amendment relates to corrections, updates, or modifications concerning costs, revenue sources, acceptance of facilities pursuant to dedications which are consistent with Ithe Comprehensive Plan, or the date of construction of any facility except transportation facilities enumerated in the Schedule of Capital Improvements. For transportation facilities, a delay in construction of a facility which causes the level -of -service of that facility to deteriorate below the adopted minimum level -of -service standard for the roadway will require a comprehensive plan amendment. Policy 5.10: The county shall ensure that all capital improv of the Comprehensive Plan are completed according to schf those which are subject to one of the following: ➢ Projects providing capacity equal to, or greater tl within or added to the Schedule of Capital Improv( );I. Modification of development orders issued coni availability of public facility capacity provided by shall restrict the allowable amount and schedule of by the capacity of public facilities according to the ➢ Amendment of the plan to reduce the adopted sta facilities until the fiscal year in which the delayed > identified in the various elements The only acceptable delays will be the delayed project are accelerated orally or subject to the concurrent delayed project. Such modification -lopment to that which can be served ised schedule; or •d for the level -of -service for public ect is scheduled to be completed. 309 Implementation An important part of any plan is its implementation. Implerhentation involves execution of the plan's policies. It involves taking actions and achieving results. For the Capital Improvements Element, implementation involves various activities. While some of these actions will be ongoing, others are activities that will be taken by certain points in time. For each policy in this element, table 6.20 identifies the type of action required, the responsible entity for taking the action, the timing, and whether or not the policy, necessitates a capital expenditure. To implement the Capital Improvements Element, several (different types of actions must be taken. These include: development of mechanisms for funding new facilities, adoption of land development regulations and ordinances, execution of interlocal agreements, coordination, and preparation of studies and evaluation and monitoring reports. Overall, the Capital Improvements Element implementation responsibility will rest with the Office of Management and Budget. Besides its responsibilities as identified in table 6.18, the planning department has the additional responsibility of ensuring that other entities discharge their responsibilities. This will entail notifying other applicable departments of capital expenditures to be included in their budgets, notifying other departments and iroups of actions that must be taken, and assisting other departments and agencies in their plan implementation responsibilities. As part of the Capital Improvements Element, the county as developed a Concurrency Management Plan, which ensures the maintenance of the adopted level -of -service standards. Through the Concurrency Management Plan, the county will measure facility capacity, assess development demand, and maintain a Capital Improvements Program I which ensures that the level -of -service standards are maintained. Table 6.19: Capital Improvement Element implementation Matrix Policy Type of Action Responsibility Timing Capital Expenditure 1.1 Maintain the CIP I OMB/`PD Ongoing No 1.2 Follow the CIP PDI Ongoing No 1.3 Prioritize capital improvement projects I OMB/PD/SD Ongoing No 1.4 Implement recommendations Appropriate County Departments/SD Ongoing Yes 1.5 Prioritize and implement programs AppropriateICounty Departments/SD Ongoing Yes 310 I Table 6.19: Capital Improvement Element Implementation Matrix Policy Type of Action I Responsibility Timing Capital Expenditure 1.6 Maintain previous commitments I BCC/PWD/SD Ongoing No 1.7 Replacement and renewal of infrastructure Appropriate County Departments/SD Ongoing No 1.8 Budget Management OMB/SD Ongoing No 1.9 Define capital improvement i PD/OMB Ongoing No 1.10 Capital Budget Management I OMB/SD Ongoing No 1.11 Capital Improvements Management I OMB/,SD Ongoing No 1.12 School District Fiver-Year Facilities Work Plan SD Ongoing Yes 2.1 Define costal high hazard area DCA Ongoing No 2'2 density and intensity levels of current FLU PE Ongoing No Maintain P 2.3 . Budget management Appropriate County Departments Ongoing Yes 2.4 Maintain LOS standards Appropriate County Departments Ongoing Yes 2.5 Funding mechanisms 1 BCC/Private Developers Ongoing No 2.6 Infrastructure replacement strategy Appropriate County Departments Ongoing No 3.1 Maintain concurrency management system PD Ongoing No 3 2 Follow connection matrix of Comprehensive Plan Sub- Appropriate County Ongoing No Elements Departments 3.3 Maintain adopted LOS standards 1 PD Ongoing No 3.4 Land use decisions I BCC Ongoing No 3.5 Adopt LOS standards BCC/SD/Appropriate County Departments Ongoing No 4.1 Impose regulations Appropriate County Departments Ongoing Yes 4.2 Conduct research OMB/,PD Ongoing No 4.3 Work with municipalities 1 BCC/SD/Other Local Governments in IRC i Ongoing No 5 1 Approve land use changes only if infrastructure can BC' Ongoing No support land use change 5.2 Prioritize capital improvements BCC/SD/Appropriate County Departments Ongoing No 311 Table 6.19: Capital Improvement ElementlImplementation i Matrix Policy Type of Action Responsibility Timing Capital Expenditure 5.3 Extension of facilities and services BCC/Appropriate Departments County Ongoing No Appropri Ite County 5.4 Create an efficient capital improvements schedule Departments/Other Ongoing No Government Agencies 5.5 Utilize enterprise funds ON B Ongoing No 5.6 Finance non -enterprise fund supported projects O 1 B Ongoing No 5.7 Fund the construction of public facilities OMB/SD I Ongoing Yes 5.8 Permitting Requirements BCC/Appropriate Departments County Ongoing No 5.9 Amending the Schedule of Capital Improvements BCC/OMB/PD/SD Ongoing No 5.10 Improvements Complete the Schedule of Capital Im p p p BCC/SD/AI Y ppropriate X32024 No County Departments 5.11 Adopt a Priority Transportation Capital Improvements gCC/P 1D/MPO Ongoing No Schedule BCC = Board of County Commissioners DCA = Department of Community Affairs FDOT = Florida Department of Transportation MPO = Metropolitan Planning Organization OMB = Office of Management and Budget PD = Planning Department PWD = Public Works Department SD =School District Evaluation and Monitoring Procedures To be effective, a plan must not only provide a means for implementation; it must also provide a mechanism for assessing the plan's effectiveness. Generally, a plan's effectiveness can be judged by the degree to which the plan's objectives have been met. Since objectives are structured, as much as possible, to be measurable and to have specific timeframes, the plan's objectives are the benchmarks used as a basis to evaluate the plan. Table 6.20 identifies each of the objectives of the Capital the measures to be used to evaluate progress in achieving are quantitative, such as adopting land development requi the level -of -service standards, adopting a capacity mot measures, table 6.20 also identifies timeframes associates The Planning Department staff will be responsible Improvement Element. This will involve collection of svements Element. It also identifies objectives. Most of these measures ts, which ensure the maintenance of g system and others. Besides the with meeting the objectives. monitoring and evaluating the Capital and compilation of information regarding 312 facility capacity, expansion, and new development permitted. This will be done on a regular basis. As part of the county's Concurrency Management System, the Planning Department will continually monitor the facility capacity to ensure that level -of -service! standards will be maintained. Table 6.20: Capital Improvements Element Evaluation Matrix Objective Measure I Timeframe 1 Existing deficiencies in county services and/or obsolete or worn-out fal ilities 2-8232024 2 Land use density and intensity in Coastal High Hazard Area I 2030 3 Level -of -service provided for county services 2.030 4 Existence of appropriate Land Development Regulations 2030 5 Completion of the Schedule of Capital Improvements I 2030 While monitoring will occur on a continual basis, formal evaluation of the Capital Improvements Element will occur annually. The formal evaluation and appraisal of the entire Comprehensive Plan will occur every ten years (dependent upon the schedule adopted by the Florida Department of Community Affairs). Besides assessing progress, the evaluation and appraisal process will also be used to determine whether the Capital Improvements Element objectives should be modified or expanded based on revisions to state statutes and changing conditions not identified and addressed as part of the annual CIE update. In this way, the monitoring and evaluation of the Capital Improvements Element will not only provide a means ofdetermining the degree of success of the plan's implementation; it will also provide a mechanism for evaluating needed changes to the plan element not otherwise addressed in the yearly update of the Capital Improvements Element. As discussed in the above paragraphs, the evaluation and monitoring procedures identified for the Capital Improvements Element are basically the same for he entire Comprehensive Plan. These procedures have been used in the past to prepare the county's Evaluation and Appraisal Report and will be used by the county in subsequent Evaluation and Appraisal Reports. The monitoring and evaluation of this plan is critical to ensure that the policies are effective in achieving the plan's goals and objectives. Each individual element of the plan contains provisions and measures to be used in the review of the element. Each element contains an Implementation and Evaluation Matrix and monitoring procedures, which are currently being used to prepare the current Evaluation and Appraisal Report and will be used to prepare future Evaluation and Appraisal Reports. In addition, a great portion of the plan monitoring will I management system which is designed to ensure that a maintained and that sufficient capacity exists in the various of the plan or plan elements is likely to occur in the d, regulations, which will result in plan amendments. in conjunction with the concurrency roved level -of -service standards are rvices and facilities. Other evaluation to day application of the mandated 313 The formal Evaluation and Appraisal Report required by 1aw is currently providing and in subsequent versions will provide a complete review of the plan and bei conducted in compliance with the public participation procedures adopted for the development of this plan. As part of the monitoring system, all appropriate baseline updated. Besides assessing progress, the evaluation and determine whether the objectives should be modified or evaluation of the Comprehensive Plan Elements not only of success of the plan's implementation; it also provides a to the plan element. FACommunity Development\Comprehensive Plan Text Amendments\CIE\2019\2019 is currently being updated and will be isal process is and will also be used to :Ided. In this way. the monitoring and Ides a means of determining the degree ianism for evaluating needed changes Improvements strikethrough.doc 314 C E i p a E R 'c R U N Q 0 O y U 0 L O v _ v K ry U W� d d a� T „ O D c w r (z Yi Yi �i �i ii C L C z O z Oi z UYi c c 9 Z V] v _ x F E y E x F m c x F x F v x F c U u O >° Q I {i Q LL W y c U v u VCuu v 6 y C G Gq� c c a O O m a m a i,. a O a J W v C7 F O O a G F 0 FA 0 fA 0 69 0 NW o c M o fA 0 0 0 HI d! 0 M 0 dl 0 Hl 0 0 coo in 0 o fn fn n v°Ci fA o 0 !� 0 o N 0 } W 0 0 0 h 0 o o c o 0 c 0 o � 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 M O W 0 O 0 r 0 vOi o O c c O c Oh o 0 0 o c o 0 0 0 0 O h o c o } W O in O dl C O O fn O O O fn O O M O O fA O !n O f/) O O M d3 O V! O Vf O fn O fn O fn O O fA fA O (A O fA O V! C C } W O O h O O O vOi � O (A O C h 43 C iA C i9 O C M N O M O fn O N O N O O O O � O O Hi in O fn O Vi O fn T O W N h VI N di b O+ f/3 N N O O in O O O dl O O O fn O O O N O O h V3 iA iA —_ o0 M O C O f/I O O O 41 Y v = O O C .nn C C E b E E E° opp e Q e E e � v y o E E C E° � 0 0 0 0 < < � E o b' E E u y > > S >> �i J O V y LL ° .. E E o E -E T TY TU y v E E E E E E E E c Y Y `o 2 o 2 L n L c s z € <<ON ON 0 as 0 £o £ X4.:2 res ° °3 N Q 2 � : �)�(/ p - /\/j[ 2±y 21 9 2 � : C) rqN u F C � � G E � Q O II. ^^O = N E k O Q p U •c � E y E a U < E c F c c c o cp Too L at o w�Fatr`�. •� c v, uiO 0 Z z w g- -=� >' U nn o •� u � �o w z z ti a c E� y = C O J G G � Q A N N N N C T y Y t O C . = a' a T n T ti C O O O O O O O ti (y z z z z z z z z z z } } } } } C = 9 E F F F FSP > c N h n C Z .• V N 3 o c = to o O F- `-j U O 01 7 v F` `•� G d U V1 11 O �` 1 G O G O p p. F� 0 0 0 0 o 0 c 0 o o o c c o o 0 c 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 » c 0 » o 0 V 0 0 in 0 o M 00 a IIL M N 0 o 0 fn o dj c vi o o 0 VNI o `n O o 0 vi O o o 0 M 00 c 0 d! c 0 di 0 o 0 o o 0 Vi c d+ O ds o o 0 N 0 0 0 C fn 0 0 C N � N O N } w O O h O N O O M O O VN3 O Vi O O O O M O M C C O fA O N O O � O N O O fn O O N� O O yNj N N } O O d) O O O O Vf O O O O d) O O C O C O O d! O O O O O O � O O O O O O O O O Vi O O O O O fA O fl3 O O O O O d3 O N3 O fA O di O M O O O O O d! O VI O in O N p O O dl O O } O O O r O N O di O O O O O O O O b OO - - O di O O - O - O - O - O - O - O - O V! O+ P V! = I. v O V N A L d d d qEi d d v n3 O• O• L '� L .G L L L L a C y O z < < $ d o v o v d e d v V = U 0 3 0 o rv c < •� < < < < < < < < 3 E v v it v c o 0 U U s U . `' w o `c 00 c � v c °0 GD co � C° m c 00 `� C0 O � E E E E a= to e, a m s a Y co a U O o U o O U o U . .E U c U c U O U� c U c 0 • E- s E s E s E x .2 in v v n a - � ` � = � e e e = 2 c E rL' v O E o F O F y o y F 0 c 0 LUo. s o t n o n a Q •� a r •.• v C' •• o L' ., o c L' ., o o F 8 .. o F &' .. o o F H o� F; L' `c L' ., o `o m o u cIdo "o c c "n v c p 'g' c c E o c e n c,7 vim a N a v y .-to E .-i E .a E v S .. v a .. v .. .:7 .. a v :.' a U a U U ac' U 5 f - C) rqN u F C � � G E � Q O II. ^^O = N E k O Q p U •c � E y E a U < 0 7_ C a T y 0 o j q T 'O C ti fi U N T y O � y 4 4C 2 n L n c to Z Z F F .Z F F -� F '� C C C C— G C -- C C C C C O� O O E EwmOOmO E a a E a $ E a E a E$ c 0 0 o c 0 0 c o .. c o 0w0u�0[u00 0 0 c o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o �n M 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 c vi 0 0 c o 0 0 o c 0 0 o vi 0 0 N n` c lo lc �c "_ P C fn Vf fn fn � M in y dl O C O O O O O O O O O C O 0 0 0 N LL V3 V3 O O O C vOi vOi d) MN O C !fi h O O O N O fA O .. fA O C 0 W (A 0 0 M (n 0 IA O O N 0 N Ni O O O O vOi VO1 O O O O � O �/1 f/1 in d1 d) N 0 C O O O 0 d1 O O O y � N � 0 0 fA Vi 0 0 C C O C 0 0 N O O N 0 C N O C fn M O O fA fA O C O� V ry O O �/1 O ? H � � w O C 0 0 O O 0 0 O O Hf O O 0 fn 0 0 � di 0 0 Vi to 0 0 fA (n 0 0 Vi O O O 0 0 f/3 Y3 O O 0 0 O O fn O O O O O O Vi } (s. 0 0 (A F9 0 0 O O 0 0 {A O 0 0 fA 4i 0 0 C M 0 0 O O 0 0 O O �n M M qin } O O O N O vl N oC O da t�f iA w a. .. O 9 V Y Y y Q O c U O. E << u u G 6 ^ C C o c � S' C U CD G u In h v O- �.. E � E E E 'g .ae EE E E �' .u. �' " c E E 2 o n c W ni Lu << w i.. ii. F F O ul w m x in F 0 z � N T - en +' Y `o y, G T y O 0 � r� r�tr} }> e m m m m F � •c F= A F F � F� F F F F F F F F F F F F F V1 � V1 y N VI v N :� In VJ VI V1 N VI 7 1 1 7 O O O G 0 0 C C C C O C O G C G •O d a 0 4 6 G d 6 G 6 6 6 G G G G O E m O E 00- 0- 01000 O O 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o c c c o c c 0 0 o a o 0 0 o c c o o c o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D o c 0 o N c c o 0 0 0 o N o 0 0 0 D o c C fA N) Nrl � � fA � - 6A fn � 6A � � dP' fA M � 6A iN9 69 � � 69 E•A f/t M x 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o c c o o c o 0 0 0 0 0 0 o c c n » v3 » » » vi ✓+ o c o � o v+ � vi Fn o 0 c 0 Fn o 0 » » o D c o o c N N 6A M Fn Fn 4A L9 r � r m o c o 0 0 o c o cc o 0 0 0 0 0 o c o 0 0 o c o u+ u+ o 0 o Fn 0 Fn c 0 c.. o .n » 0 c 0 o 0 0 0 0.. 0 0 0 o 0 0 c o O O O h vOi ? N N h O vOi � r Y � a 0 o c o 0 0 0 o c o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o c o 0 0 0 0 6A in O C C O O O O O O O O CO O O O O O O O O O O O f9 M Hi M O O O O d3 O 6A O N bA bA bA Yl O O 6A EA C c O O O O C O O O vt O } bA bA O O O O O C O C O O C O C O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C O C O C O O O O O O M O O (A f9 nA C 0 O C 0 0 O Fn 0 6A f/i in 0 O 0 0 O O C O O O O O vOi vCt f� N C R N vl r ry O N vhf C L C E C 6 c � o N c L � c e U U t G C c Y ppE E til [� .o o c c p cc o r� g s uu:.� otiti3rs�z c°E 120000 u u u [sl z Z m m m m F w w w U Z Z Z z f z z C\ N U U C C � y C E : C) a� u _ Q O � N E _ItZ O � �-0 E A U U y U E y E o U d O z n n - en ' o C o � G a 0. T % C• 9 T 7 J J } [y [� } � c W a E F= F F 0 o m c Oa 3 J " 0 O S O O O O 0 C O O 0 0 O O O O of O O v O vi O C F e 0 Y 4. fn » 0 0 0 0 0 0 o c n � � Y 4. 0 0 n 0 � 0 � k o voi 0 o 0 o zon o 0 � O O } N � N k. O O C O. O O N O N (L 0 2 0 Z c c v � Z c c LV r. el a cc I 41 N U U U F U co Q O. W (A U -- O\ Cl N U G C � y F E 2 0 E u c U 'E .SE4 Eov�v ° Cy � �-E' ° z o Go > c G 6 cr'� n� W W c c cv co N Ca L C €y a c y O L �°.. O C O O Qj 01 4d a� C O L O N O v E G':. O o m 0 0 0 O N d N U N M u y O t7 E > > >> N ^ v n L G C G Y W YC O L e a; '- .Y " O � C 6 E c .. y y a o. n. 0 a 'O ri tc.. m m m U y n c 3 fn j E .a C1 V E� vJ c c c E E p Cr U< <> U p T � G 08 E Z° U O •O y y x h y E E K O f_ G G � O c •o � � C o u y y a a O O F O O � a r vi �p r vi O O epi ri O C O C co Q O. W (A -- O\ Cl N U G C � y F ° z o c _ c c y W 1. Y Qj 01 4d a� C t� e+ E o m 0 0 0 ` eo O t7 E > > >> L C v n L G C G Y W YC O L E c .. y y a o. n. 0 a 'O E m m m U y n c 3 fn j E .a C1 V E� vJ c c c E E p Cr U< <> U p 08 E U A c� i-�i rn oC7- CIO aril �m _ a `s CIO oil 0 0 6 8 W w r } r r r Z Z Z r Z Z Z Z T Z r r w C W w C �3 w 16 4 L 16. 4, ti li {i k c o d o E u u u u u o u rn E E ' Q E n E E E x a E n E E _ � c a O O a r aI O'l i O, a O a ON O i a 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 c O 0 0 0 D o c C O 0 0 o o g O O 0 o 0 O 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 C o 0 O O 0 O O 0 o O 0 o 0 0 0 c o 0 0 o o O r P P Q DG � (n O fn G Vr � fA O h � to h V3 C VNi rN O fn Vi O Yl O to O � h O Vrf � r) h X N N W O rn O M O (n O O N rn O O dl Fn O O O O rn O N O O fn N O O. O V1' O rn O dl O O NI (n 0 rn 0 C C N w O di J 6A FA iA fn fn fA M Vi to O O O� O LA N O (A O to O } W N r W rn rA FA o vi c o 0 o 0 on rA rA <n rA rA rn o rn 0 o 0 0 0 � o rn w rn rn c 0 0 o rn o rn c c c o rn o o rA » rn o rn 0 o 0- o P .•i yr } w 0 c 0 0 vi o 0 0 o a 0 0 0 o 0 » vi 0 0 rn rn o o 0 0 c v3 o o o FA 0 0 0 rn 0 o 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 sA o o 0 o v+ z r ac } W � Y U u o m d E E z x y a o: d ° E •� a P� ��� E w y c= H a E L' x E a a E z y m o 9 12 m 04T r Tum n v �ooY� �' e� Q 2 3- c m M —L d d ti v a V v i 0 o C 6 fOL I[J Z d' C G � ._ •• Y Y Y v. v C = F yr E e e a ci C 3 5h O = E as aari Zm aZ3 30v`a is .tea, �[- t -F A c� 0 o I n x N Z;; } Z;; LL c C O 0 O O o O di V O K fn a O O fn 43 O fn O fn O f/i V R r O fA O Vi O Vi O i9 O (A O 4i O (n O F! O fn O fA O O O O o O {n O O f7 VJ r } � U O L L a H F/1 M 6 i C fA Vi fn } O C O O O vO1 O OD\ O �J R N O Vi 4i 'C a � fl! V1 as w T y L O O O O O O O O O C O � CD „� O O (n NI O O fn (n O O� N O O O O vt N O Vi O d3 O N C O C vi O N O O C O 0 N 0 C O C O O � O M O M O O di M O M C O M in N O C G � } a Cl N ly ?}}}z ? z zzz° z z z J�- z Y z z z z z z O E Y E Y E E E Y E — Y U C h LL LL K F K F K F F n F LL LL E" LL LL co O F n y C C C C ', c 0 C 0 •� C 0 C 0 O o '� c co 0 oc co U G E 'E — a U U a a c � U U U U a s n c V N E 00 V c 0 U E C U U U 'Q'G .� LL U U U ,c U y U O U U N U U O N C d 'G U {i U LL o o V o G 5 G 0 0 G 5< U li U v: o U u: U w o G o 0 G O O O O O 0 sf O 0 �O O O N R h R .. .. C .. O O O O O O O x 0 0 7 �n R r'i x h 0 N 7 O O O vi O O N O N O n vOi O O d � N E 0 o n x N Z;; } Z;; LL C O 0 O O o O di V O K fn a O O fn 43 O fn O fn O f/i V R r O fA O Vi O Vi O i9 O (A O 4i O (n O F! O fn O fA O O O O o O {n O O f7 VJ r } � a H F/1 M fA Vi fn } O C O O O vO1 O OD\ O �J R N O Vi 4i � fl! V1 w O O O O O O O O O C C O h O O (n NI O O fn (n O O� N O O O O vt N O Vi O d3 O N C O C vi O N O O C O 0 N 0 C O C O O � O M O M O O di M O M C O M in N O C } Cl N ly u U C C C C C C ', c 0 C 0 •� C 0 C 0 O o '� c co 0 oc co U G E 'E � a a c � ,� a� F a v a s O 00 V c 0 U a> of Q C U U U U .� LL U U U ,c U y U O U U N U U O N C c E vOi O O d � N E .7 b c $� 'n�'+ 1cNru eU eU eU �U, U Q 3 h II II o 0 .� P Q Q h' .Z P P Q Q Q Q P Q r C m 2 Z G � C T Y " o ' c m � 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 G o `n va Fn y o �n 0 rn �n � o 0 w vi o 0 U o U o U m 0 U Q a� O e °? T m N T " 3 O � 0 0 0 o O O o 0 0 o O o 0 0 a = c o 0 o c N t� 9 T 'O } Lt m W W z z z z Y z z }} O (A 7 z z z z z z z z z z z z Y• O v m E .v E Y E JC } E Y Nc E Y E Y c E Y E E Y V1 U n W W L 'c 'C W L e 3 — y W L E .. W L LI !sJ W L m 'eG-o y W e W 4 El m L 'J C v � vi E u U „ U v v v U v u L U v — E v ci T u T <+ T i+ �. r, T 0 u u w43 C L 6 v N U N G y d OC y G y 6 0 C O< 0 0 O C 7 7 0 . O N 7 V w O o O O 5 eo 7 5 0 0 a N 00 U w 0 c C 5 0 o O U W 0 c O 5 0 o C U W 0 0 O 7 o o O U w c c C j .. .. O 7 j 0 O O O U w 0 o O j 0 0 O U ¢. 0 0 O U w U 0 0 O v �� v r o 0 o �i o c o c c o vi = a vi N Fn c h vj o n c N v`�i vi h o o h 0 c o o c o o c r_ » o or P in vi N o r in 0 o � � Fvi i P o 0 .� •� N h' .Z .2 0 r C m 2 Z G � W c m � 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 fn `n va Fn y o �n 0 rn �n � o 0 w vi o 0 U o U o U m 0 U Q 0 O e °? T m N O � 0 0 0 o O O o 0 0 o O o 0 0 o c o 0 o c N t� O N Lt m C (n O O fA fA O O O iA O C O M Q O O � Vi O (A C Ni O M O fA G O O t1 t E w O v m .v > } o Nc c c W 'c 'C VI h Q vrvi C1 O N O 0 C C � E 'd �O aC A o C N E .Ia o A E d �A C a c E ¢ p u Q .� .� •� .� .Z .2 en C m 2 Z G � 2 c m � U U U C U 9 U o U U m U U Q C O e °? T m N O � m v in •- K x c G t E w 0 v m .v > o Nc c c 'c 'C e 3 — y E E .. u !xl LI !sJ m 'eG-o y h 'C 'J C G � E u � a 2, � L• � a mG w43 SP ca c O v �� cam' Kw �U 00 00 O� u U UO Um u G Ztci U (p VI h Q vrvi C1 O N O 0 C C � E 'd �O aC A o C N E .Ia o A E d �A C a c E ¢ p u Q O z _T O N d U C G � � G E � t: p Ca o N � F �1 a R CU N T a k � E � z Q U �Q o' o � � a 0 o C U Q r 'C G O U T v a T 'O C L u 1 U L V L N L LL 4 LL LL LL LL LL LL t Li. LL LL E E E E E E E ' E E E G < G <1<1<1<1 4 < < o o 0 c 0. g o 0 00 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 coo 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 c o c c o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 F 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 `n 0 0 v } 0 c 0 0 o 0 LL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o c o 0 N N O in O fl1 O _ � } LL 0 Fn 0 0 f/1 dl 0 0 in N 0 0 C N O O N O O N N O O F/t O O � N a } h � h N LL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o } fr. 0 0 0 0 0 c o n n vi 0 0 0 o o 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 o n o isi 0 0 0 c N } fn rsi (n en _ Lr. 0 U ° E 2 0 a` a m 3 3 c E v c E d o _T O N d U C G � � G E � t: p Ca o N � F �1 a R a k � E � z Q U �Q O � � a 0 o C U Q C O U 'i M 0 c d = Y " o � o ' a 6 ++ � d 3 O G `cl a b T C L. a' zp zp zp zp zp z r > > a r c C v 6 � L• ti F= F ol O ol 0-1 w` O O F 0 c 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 o o 0 0 c C o c 0 o 0 0 o 0 0 c 0 0 0 o o 0 0 0 c 0 � N M C o ry N 0 o N � M � }}O C O in O in O in O C 00 iA O N O fA O 4i O fA O O in fn C 8 O N N } O (n O d3 C fA O fn O O O O O C O O iN/) fNli O (n C V3 C H O O in O O O O O O O � } Lr. C bi O O O O O O O fA 0 H3 0 N! i9 O (n O fA O fA O O Vi O O O O � O O O O O n N1 O O O C O O O O O iA O O O C O O O O O O V! b3 O O O O O O O C O O O vi O O O fn O O in O O O to N r n n rd 9 c0 Z o C p 3 U •� U U U E N r o v � v x � � •`. o •O C e0 n E 5 Ejjjjjj 5 � Z v Z° Z 7_ E n E o z a Z cn eo snt2n2n2.�_z E0 E0� � V 5 U L U y G G C G Y=. T s E s E s E s E o g E E W U? w a e o E c E o E o E p, Z n Z n Z a Z $ a Q G W i F i F a F a F v°• > O U Iil o tir c F F F 'i M Q Q E Mw 72 Al =r-4 h f,. i `t „y i E E A U A U d d 3 _ s s s s �s C 2 «� 3 2 E E ,e°e EE b Q != m f= F a s; » ❑ i= _ z 3 � z: s E = 3= z m v v o - E p6. b Q MW Vii. Y G 0 pp 'd A ° E F _ Q rgry G o S E 25 E I 3 Z 2 £ € 3 1! 8 m M 3- 9M 'g E3� ME3- 3 8 3 - z u1. m�a u 8 8 R �6 8 8�"��� _ S .9 - t. 3 - C 'c E € �' �.191 ¢ G < 6 6 � T � h °E E - 5 49 65 66 V t d 43 c - U A � d F F A 8 H F E U L _ a v 8 8 88 8888 88 88 I I5� RR 5Q2 r - k� m e L� a D Ci E E E E E E O S 11 ti - - - c - h _ F E2 c E 2< 5 5 585 58 I 58 qs .iv x :i U P Q 5 -'e < 79 € e 9 _ iq ��'�� •' `'� EmsE_' G" 5 b f � F S - 19, E - - x 1= F Q qQ5s� RRRR pQ gg QQ QQp QQ g QQQ itc gg pQQ H ty F � k'. f. Zi YV ��» �� a$(,�OQJN r•� � a$a$ � ai � n_ �agaV m m c c E E E - c i z• P Q E u e c ob"5 a f F= F F F E _ _ F F L FqQ SS Qy pQ S Qq 525 Q Q $ o$$ Q F F m Pm F M yO� im OQQ QO S 5 UQ � • , 4�i g 5� U >QQ 6 • Q Rg'c'1?§ s«Q 525 � «����� � QQ o 0 0 o QQ Q y 33 55�2 ??3p �8 S 8-acg, S S S 25b E o E='e 25 i� 8 8 88 S 5f S �a�g+ u ¢ v u { w ¢ o tc s o c" o c o Eq F It 9 = r a 5 3 = E N O n E F H F hE K 41 s> > F L� Q a 6/ Y V W � F � N N O^ O O O O O O O N^ Vl l� ^ tD O O O O� 00 Cl 0 0 [� 7 l0 ^ ^ N M O O N M 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0� O N^ N b 7 00 n O Vl N �0 O M Cl O O O O O O O N lc O C O O --� b to ^ M n N O O b M O vl O O Vn Vl O Vl w 7 O Vl b l� b- N^ V) Vl O N �O V1 - V Cl V1 N O O O O O l0 V O O O O 00 V1 a l0 F V) C:' 69 69 N tl) 00 M O ao Vl m h M 69 69 �D 69 Vl 69 Vl 'r•-- N �C •--• O O O vi O Vl O N 69 69 O tV 69 r4 N r- O M Vi v Vl oo 7 O Cl O 0 N NVi 69 69 M FV) ^ 69 69 r- 69 6�9 00 Vl 69 613 69 6N9 N Vi 69 ^ 69 to fN 00 0 0 0 00 0 0 0o Ic 0 O 0 O 0 C C. C 0 O^ 0o O C O 0 l0 Cl 69 Vl O vl vi O O 60 O O Vi 10 00 O O o 69 0 U) 0 O C. O 0 69 0 O 0 69 Cl 69 0 69 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 69 M t- 0 69 0 V1 0 O 0 69 0 O 0 69 0 69 O, 69 Cl .11 O rl O 69 6s O O Vj O Vel t, C 0 C O O V! 0� O M O �C O O O 00 O 0 0 O to Cl 00 0 Vl O N O M N vi vi n V7 N OO C M N O O 00 N try t7 O O O M M I'1 Vl O O V t- V Vl Cl G1 Cl Mcq O V) b to O V- b9 69 69 69 69 V3 69 69 Vl 69 69 69 O O O O D\ 69 O O 00�00{ tY N O O CD O O^ N O O Vl O Vl 69 t- Vl O O 00 O f/i Vl l0 r- In Vl lc 4\ ^ M vl M It O M ul ^ N C, -^ 7 N N M�'o M W R OCD 69 Vl fn V3 W ^ 69 69 M a 0o toO O oo M O O O Ol c-1 M Cl O cc l� O O O O Oo M b 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 O o 0 0 o Cl o o CJ o 0 o CD O; r Vj O O 69 69 O O O O 69 N 69 O O O 69 Vl 69 69 O O O 69 Cl 69 00 M O O O O O O O O O O C O �O 00 O O O Vi C O C� t- O O O O O to L O O to � N N U Vl ^ vl N O M O O O 7 V1 Vl N Vl O Ol n n M C\ Cl V1 O ^ O O O h M N m �• U at a• c a0i C O EO O N 69 ° 69 69 69 Ul V) 69 N V3 tn V C 69 N 0 U 69 O C C%] M W d .G = A O �+ 0 c 3 " Cl 69 o00 'D O 0 69 0 69 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 Vi 00 Cl O 61� O O o O 0 O 0 O 0 69 0 69 0 69 o O It t, O O O O O 69 Q 00 a cs t� O 0 C 0 C n C 0 0 0 n. V) cn O 00 C O N N ^ O O C> O Vl b Vl O ^ Vj t- O b O O 00 N „y N Vl vl 69 O N O O Vl n Cl [l Cl C\ N b 00 n O Cl t� 7 vl N G1 ^ O V' O N 00 It N N M^ l0 N M N o0 SI)b O N 69 69 V! 69 69 69 69 69 69 Vi w Vi W O Vi c0 10 Co 0 t- 00 O Vi O 69 C> O CD Cl CD O CD O h O v) t- 00 M 7 N 0 O 0 O Cl t- 0 Vi 0 69 0 O 0 O t- N O 0 O 69 O os to O n O^ C O O O lc N Vl oc O O r- 0 0 0 0 O rl ^ O NN O O O O vi O N M N O v) vi O l� O 00 N N Vl M V� V O O O - Cl 'C V1 ^ N O I- M M oc o0 D\ n oc O ^ M 7 r- 69 Vl V1 oc O 00 N tq N O N V3 d' 69 ^ M&" Vi N 69 ^ [� 69 M 69 N 69 N 63 M N r- 69 to 00 N 0, 69 69 69 W N O o It 0 0 0 0 Cl 0 as b 1^ n^ N O o 0 o M O o l� 00 o^ -- 69 o 0^ M 0 0 69 O C O C O 0 69 O V b oo N C� b c O I N � V1 n O C Cl 0 O o 66 N n 69 O^ o^ N r N M O V O V1 Vl C0 O M V1 vi N vj 00 ^ CT a0 O O O 7 Vl vj C) M N t- 00 0 O 00 V1 O N t-- Vl r V n ^ l� Cl M 69 69 N c t- 00 M N 69 O M N 00 M M Vl Cl N 69 69 M 69 69 613 Vi Hj 69 Vj 69 � w v 9 C O y 7 W C Ei O A N o a w E U c 00 c a E t F o a 0 s N D o ti v U > y O O W mx O En h O d O a� rn y .2 U c W O O � 7 N £ ¢ J •O N� C� E 0. pq rG- In C. n. E �, °� E ai c a f a C Cn E A r U o F Q ti U o¢ c 3 a o o N y U U O A U E 'ty Gi W A 0.' ^- Q Q P] a1 93 U 0 W L. u. tz o _E F .-1 O cn rn F U U > > 3 IE- Q a 6/ Y V W � F � 00Vl O O t- G -,O O -n 7 ClM m lc O O O C Gs cl IT I (D O 0 o 00 Cl b to • G, l0 O M C, O O ut N C, N N C O Cl b O V. O- ^ a oo Cl ^ ^ v a o fA b9 Y3 69 V) 69 69 M 69 OO O O O M O O O m O O O O O O 69 o O M N O O O O O O '*' N vi O Vl O N O O O tV N M N r- O M I-- t w Vl oo 7 O Cl O 0 N 0 O a 00 N N ^ 69 t- r- 69 t- 00 Vl 69 613 N Vi 69 ^ 69 to fN 00 0 0 0 00 0 0 0o Ic 0 O 0 O 0 C C. C 0 O^ 0o O C O 0 l0 Cl kn �I Vl O vl vi O O O O 0, Vl N m O t- w 'r Vl 10 O C1 d' Vl N O N CN O V1 O 69 69' O 69 69 69 6s Vi Vj Vel t, 69 V! OO O O O �C O O N 00 0 0 C C 0 0 0 Vl N M N vi vi n O O CJ 00 OO C Vl O R 00 N try t7 M I'1 Vl O 00 69 N G1 III V- Vi O 69 69 69 V3 69 69 Vl M V3 l0 69 O O O O D\ Cl O O 00�00{ b O O CD O O^ N O O Vl O Vl O t- Vl O O 00 O N V Vl l0 r- In Vl lc 4\ ^ M vl M It O M ul ^ N C, -^ 7 N N M�'o M W R OCD 69 Vl fn V3 69 ^ 69 69 M a 0o toO O oo M O O O Ol c-1 M Cl O cc l� O O O O Q\ Q\ M b N CS O O N N o kn h M t -r v. n ^ Cl O t - 14 6q V1 69 69 .-. 69 69 69 V 69 C, 69 L U >. U a ip 3 m U at a• c a0i C O EO ° °- eu V C N 0 U O C C%] M d .G = A O �+ 0 c 3 " y° C a a d `bn W a cs c U U W is J n. V) cn F E- Q a 6/ Y V W � F � co N to 3 Cd 0 o �. o O O cd M 0 o }� co aIZ4 co 0 N .r a U ,N b a o �rq O CIS O Cd ti Q. 3 cq 0 ca cz ca saI O cd U 4 di b cc 03 �. � 04 C0 to o o 0 3 o 0 No ca c') �ct 0 3 O 'G C-1 fs 0 o U 03 '� m � o N X. >1 N O > o M O O b 5 Ca `eco a . o .o .� Q. •5 +� Jo-, . o .to O O U >O > O O �.�-4 M M I- N N n n 9 '900 C O O N 7 O 4D b 69 w O a O (py tp C O N(d a Q "v', N of N C� !00 M W N N M V N O u W Ld h p O O rpt 8 N cV CO w q' O M l0%! N O N N p g O N tu�j 40 C �y g co N tppp OnC�� O appp f�Vy CD fLq N N dd N N y fA 49 fA d/i M 1011 Esq o m 8NN 0 C N e8� N N N (q col ��} mq 6H dI N fA 49 af! N R s s o g � ^ cv o c c 0 c 0 .a u (A O y 'u x x N =� di n N N N 0 N N N N J N N N N N N O d U. E E E E E E ES s99.9 E E E E E a' el 11 � e A Z �$ > 4S }i �s `s Z Z Z Z Z I 0 Q CLx co W y ' c Q y 07 y � I � a U o�p R V cD y 1(f O C7 t0 ° 7 7 y 07 fn (A q+ 4ry > Q m > > y y 1A O N a 7 N Oi * V 9 N $$ OS N p�j Cf Q jt OD C `c E r 10v im e pE y� c c my Xj IE Q fL y ' 8 o E y c c cY E E M S S 3 N E 6 a 2 0t N a 0 U U U w 0 M M I- u LN �, �J c 0) E L CILE tsu cu �J 0L �M V SF— 0 I1 E N CQ N C N N N 0 N O N 01 O N ao � r r � N N $1mt�S�'sp ui N m bv�F g tp(� to Qf CV to r N IF t+! C9 O C, C o 0 o o a o c+0 N h O to Cif N tq 'C CS i v M tts' � S 1 4 W CV m N N I O � CD en 0 W I N b ao "8 25 �n f: In g CO tv r I co w �pj O N ¢! e p Cnp. N qry rl �= M E r CV m V 4 0 0 0 Q O N 7y N a =f d CL C CD O 'K 07 iQ V ' CD r l" 1� r tf 4 9J C C4 co N o Cf t� vg � U N G � m CG m b o W 4 m a co es 7a c IC m a W d Q =f d CL OI C O/ b�re k d�. c 8 0 •R 8Am ed Amto N o Cf t� i I I I U r M M Ln N O W Q Cb N r� iCq– a o CL � � k _ ■ as _)■ #� k m ;(� ( \00 Qw # $ §)k � � Seg S}■ kcq ■ $ k `B C4 ® – - — » K k27}§ y ¥ {d iCq– a o CL � � k _ ■ as _)■ #� k m ;(� ( \00 Qw U CN M O a 1y JAWO q EE •� z i �vt tiO M 1�/pl {on V1 O g O S q �O b� t`.d ti �rr/111 � � �•1 N N� 8 vOt aNr Obi O M1 O � b M IM1 Ot O O � rod! ... � .n .+ O� b f`• � � V\ bf n Od 00 v'1 � M ' P fx O. M � 7+ gyp" I"! N .fir VN •/O't uN'h t2 O 90 S %O C4 crMOO rO fM O OOd T N M C� 0� N C> N n0 O b O M M V1 O O O O h O h h O O V • lar N �! R O�p O N ^i O ^ O i Oi O g -'R Q rt O O "p' iO �Nj' /��p gd .SQQ3 [7 N M f �1 M H v1 rri CO .r '_ r O O eJCD N e4 !+i N ..i C !q !A wy..,� (� O N M v�'1 r O fn O w O O O O O O J8 JC O p,! �2 O • rl1 M n M w� ai O b �•• M N M El' M P O M N M N q O 4f O M O O O M10 M 00 C Q 10 a O � OL O O M O O t( M O �O !O Ct N Pi M1 (� fr O Y� 0 ^1 a i4 V d 'V O � V � 7 u tn r L^ W, 110, �a a OW o S � � f • i � � � Sid i? � PG � � Z' 'r 4 �j °! A Q LC (� � •q P LG• ��' • �° w 5 H H d U U 0.. cin G O~ r N M I•! A N b ! � .w nl H n � H H r~i � n N N N CN M O a 1y Local 1.50 Mill Expenditure iFor Maintenance, Repair and Renovation Anticipated expenditures expected from local funding sources over the years coveredby the current work plan. Item 2019 - 2020 Actual Budget 2020-2021 Projected 2021 - 2022 Projected 2022-2023 Projected 2023-2024 Projected Total Remaincng Maint and Repair from 1,5 Mills $5,873;446 '$9,575,816 $10,337,988 $9,117;345 513,483;625 $48,394;220 MaintenancefRepaicSalaries $3,343,645 '$3,500,000 I $3,500,000 $3,500,000 $3,5001000 $17,343,645 School Bus Purchases $1,050,0400 $1,050,000 $1,050,000 $1,050,000 $1,050;000 $5,250,OD0 Other Vehicle Purchases $1051,000 $200,000 1 $0 $200,000 $o $500,000 Capital Outlay Equipment $0 $o I $0 $0 $0 $0 Rent/Lease Payments $0 $o $0 $0 $0 $0 COP Debt Service 310,070,50 $10,063,840 ($10,065,090 $10;068,090 $10,062,250 $50,329,860 RenuLease Relocatab'les S400,000 $400,000 I 5400.000 $400,000 $400;000 $2,000,000 Environmental Problems $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 3.1011.14 Debt Service $0 so I SO $0 $0 $0 Special Facilities Construction Account $0 $o ( $0 $0 $o $0 Premiums for Property Casualty 'Insurance -1011.71 (4ab) $1,211,991 $0 50 $0 $0 $1,211,991 Qualified School Construction Bonds (QSCB) $1,300,125 $1,300,125 I $1,300,125 $1,300,125 51,300,125 $6,500,625 Qualified Zone Academy Bonds (QZAB} $0 $0 I $0 $0 $0 $o0 State Charter School Capital Outlay $1,214,934 $1,880,460 I '$1,880,460 $1;880,460 $1,19-00,460 $8,735,774 Impact Fees 'RESTRICTED FUNDS FOR FUTURE CAPACITY PRODUCING PROJECT DUE TO GROV0TFI" $1,700,000 $1,3013,013D j '$1,300,000 $1,300,000 $1,300,000 $6,900,000 Performance Contractirng Debt Service 5891,287 so I $o $o so $891,287 Local Expenditure Totals. $27,162,018 $29.270,241 29;833,663 $28,816,020 532,976,460 $148,058,402 Revenue I I i 1.60 Mill Revenue Source i Schedule of Estimated Capital Outlay Revenue from each currently approved source which is estimated to be available for expenditures on the projects included in the tentative district facilities work program. All amounts are NET after considering carryover balances, interest earned, new COP's, 1011.14 and 1011 A5 loans, etc_ Districts cannot use 1.5 -loth funds for salaries except for those explicitly associated with main'tenancefrepair projects. (1011.71 (5), F.S_) Community Development Department Adopted December , 2019, Ordinance 2019= Page D-2 340 Item Fund 2019-2020 2020-2021 2021-2022 2022-2023 2023-2024 Total PECO 'New Construction 340 Actual Value Projected Projected I Projected Projected PECO! Maintenance Expenditures (1) Won -exempt property 9D $19,910,506,448 '$20,919,100,000 $21,879,900, 0 $22,892,700,000 $23,909;000,000 $109,511,206,448 assessed valuation $306,030 1 $306,031 1 5306,030 i $1,224;121! (2) The M'illege projected for 360 1;50 150 1_i 1.50 1.50 $59,195 discretionary capital outlay per s.1011.71 $135,051 $135,051 $135,05' $135,051 $135,051 $675,255 (3) Full value of the 1.50-1411 $33,449,651 5:15,144,086 $36,758,232 $38,459,736 $40,167,120 $163;978, discretionary capital outlay per $.1011.71 (4) Value of the portion of the 1.50 370 $28,671,129 $30;123,504 531,507,056 $32,965;488 $34,428,960 $157;696,137 -Mal ACTUALLY levied (5) Difference of lines (3) and (4) $4,778,522 $5,020,584 S5,251,11161 $5,494,248 $5,738,160 $26,282,690 PECO Revenue Source The figure in the row designated "PECO 14afntenance" wiN be subtracted from funds available for new construction because PECO !maintenance dollars cannot be used for new construction. Item Fund 2019-2020 Actual Budget 2020-2021 Projected 2021 - 2,022 I Projected 2022-2023 Projected 2023 - 2024 Projected Total PECO 'New Construction 340 SD $0 3 $m $D $0 PECO! Maintenance Expenditures CO & DS Cash Flov. through 9D $306,030 $306,03 5306,030 $306,03D $1,224,120 $123,212 $616,060 $0 $306,030 1 $306,031 1 5306,030 $306,030 $1,224;121! CO $ DS Revenue Source Revenue from Capital Outlay and Debt Service funds_ Ite m Fund 2019-2020 2020-2021 2021-2022 2022-2023 2023-2024 Total Actual Budget Projecled Projected I Projected Projected CO & DS Cash Flov. through 360 $123212 $123,212 $123,211 $123,212 $123,212 $616,060 Distributed CO & DS Interest on 360 311,836 $11,834 $11,839 $11,839 $11,63.9 $59,195 Undistnbuted CO $135,051 $135,051 $135,05' $135,051 $135,051 $675,255 Community Development Department Adopted December , 2019, Ordinance 2019= Page D-3 341 Fair Share Revenue Source AD legally binding commitments for proportionate fair -share mitigation for impacts on public school facilities must be included in the 5 -year district work program_ Nothing reported for this section_ Sales Surtax Referendum Specific information about any referendum for a 1 -cent or'/ --cent surtax referendum during the previous year_ Did the school district hold a surtax referendurn during the past fiscal year 2018 - 20191 No Additional Revenue Source Any addilionai revenue sources Item 2019-2020 ActualVatue 2020-2021 Projected 2021-20221 Projected! 2022-2023 Projected 2023-2024 Projected Total Proceeds from a s.101 1.14115 F.S_ Loom so $D to $0 $D so District Bonds -Voted local bond referendum proceeds per s.9, Art VU State Constitution so $0 to s0 S13 so Proceeds from Special Act Bonds so $0 $01 s0 so so Estimated Revenue from CO & DS Bond Sale $0 $0 to so so so Proceeds from voted Capital Improvements millage so so $0 so s0 Other Revenue for Other Capital Propects s0 $o to so so so Proceeds from id2 cent sales surtax authorized by school board so So$D SO so so Proceeds from local governmental infrastructure sales surtax so $o o SO s1) so Proceeds from Certificates of Participation (COP'S) Sale s0 SO to so so so Classrooms f=irst Bond proceeds amount. authorized in FY 1997-98 so So so s0 so so Classrooms for lids $o to $0 so so District Equity Recognition so $o to $0 so so Federal Grants so $o o $0 so $0 Proportionate share mitigation (actual cash revenue only, not in kind donations) so $0 so so so so Impact fees received $1jo ADD $1,300,000 S1,300,000 $1,300,000 $1,31)01,013[1 $6;900,000 Private donations $13 $o So so I $0 $A Community Development Department Adopted December ,-2019, Ordinance 2019= Page D-4 Mp-j Grants from Vocal govemmmnts or nol-for- So $0I 2021 - 2022 $0 $0 So 90 profit organizations Budget Projected Projected S 133,051 Projected Projected $135,051 Interest, Includirng Profit On InveSiment $16,124 $16,125 &16,125 $16,125 $16,125 $80,624 Revenue from Bonds pledging proceeds So $0 $2;931,458 $0 $0 $o so from 1 cent or 112 cent Sales Surtax PECO and 15 NO Maint and Other 1.5 ($27,162,016) ($29,270,241) ($29; ,663) ($28;616:020) (S3Z,976,460) Total Fund Balance Carried Forward S0 $700;000 54,575,220 $3,437,195 $3,557,325 $12,033,400 $3,336.432 $26,939,5721 $0 56,004,000 So $6,700,000 General Capital Oullay Obligated Fund SD $0 $306;030 $0 $0 $0 so Balance Carried Forward From Total Available 150 Mill for Men? $1,569,111 $853,263$1, 1 ,393 54:149,468 $1,452,540 Fund Balance Carried FomaraC CORS1FUC9011 i Special Fa Mies Construc5on Account $1,214,934 $432,756 $ i332 756 $432,756 $432,756 $2,945,55 One Cent -112 Cent Sales Surtax Debt So $0 $0 $0 So so Servroe From Total Fund Balanoe Carried I Forward Capital Outlay Pmjects Funds 54 $0 $o so $o 5o Carred'Forward Fr= Total Fund I Balance Carried Forward Sublotal $2;931,058 52,448,881 S1, 48,881 S7„746,881 $1,748,881 $16,626,582 Total Revenue Summary Vern Name 201,9- 20.210 2020-2021 2021 - 2022 2020-2021 Projected 2022-2023 2023 - 2024 Five Year Total Five Year Total! Budget Projected Projected S 133,051 Projected Projected $135,051 Lecall_5'PAMIl3iscrefjorraryCapital Outlay $28,671,129 $30,123,504 531,507;056 '$32,965,488 $34,428,9@0 $157;696,137 Revenue Other/Additional Revenue $2;931,458 1 S1,748,881 j, 57,748,881 $1,748,881 PECO and 15 NO Maint and Other 1.5 ($27,162,016) ($29,270,241) ($29; ,663) ($28;616:020) (S3Z,976,460) ($148,058,402) Mill Expendr2ures Total Available Revenue 54,575,220 $3,437,195 $3,557,325 $12,033,400 $3,336.432 $26,939,5721 i PECO ipelaintenanoe Revenue S4 $306;030 $306,030 5306030 $346,030 $1;224,120 Available 150 Mill for Men? $1,569,111 $853,263$1, ,393 54:149,468 $1,452,540 $9,637,735 CORS1FUC9011 i Community Development Department Adopted December , 2019, Ordinance 2019- - Page D-5 343 Item Name 2019 - 202,0 Budget 2020-2021 Projected 2021 - 2022 Projected 2022 - 2023 Projected 2023-2024 Projected Five Year Total! CO 9 133S Revenue $135,051 $13S,051 S 133,051 $135,051 $135,051 $675,255 PECO 'NTT ConstrucUen Revenam $0 $0 $0 $0 So so Other/Additional Revenue $2;931,458 $2,448,881 S1,748,881 j, 57,748,881 $1,748,881 $16;626,5&2 Tonal Additional Revenue $3,066.149 $2,583,932 Sl 83,932 S7;683,932 $1,863,932 $17,301,837 Total Available Revenue 54,575,220 $3,437,195 $3,557,325 $12,033,400 $3,336.432 $26,939,5721 Community Development Department Adopted December , 2019, Ordinance 2019- - Page D-5 343 A \i E U (u Q N Q W E U cu 9 C y n3 n. 3F2z o °-° v0 •E n d C � C a e. O CO C. r T 9 I � C v y z r z z z L rl v v � � v 0 c c p a2i til to c L x F E E j x ai F m o U F F tj F a E ti E Q C4° C Y y y O 0 •D 'OI 'D C O . ,O 4i C C o ma m ka C C y o` a o �'�3c� F o400 30 04 00 0 0 0 o c o 0 0 0 0 0 O d) fA O !A O W V1 O fA O Ni O 1� M fA N in 41 (n r O b1 O O Fn VI fn rt !n O N F 0 c c 0 o o 0 0 0 0 c 00 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 O O o a 0 o 0 1 0 h 0 o 0 o o c voi 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 c 0 0 0 N O N r m 0 to 0 vi 0 o O 00 o O o Fn c O c » o vi 0 0 0 vt 0 y 0 to 0 0 cn 0 0 `n Fn 0 » 0 to 0 Fn o 0 r 0 0 0 0 c � rn 0 0 0 0 0 0 o c o 0 0 0 0 o o � 0 0 0 0 0 P' O N r tr. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o c <A o h 0 f/i 0 FA 0 0 0 o n fA o fA 0 fA O_ C c v c E Y 4 E 'E o ° E L G oL, s a s 0 E cc_ o 0 o < C e E E n n G � nM o c v v °� a c: F 3 m m 'F- x rLil L W c v W t v v L ii m U U 'a E O N G L E L' L .. FF I.O. .. c FF 4 Y CC y 0 O O cCC W O ti L� {i Li 9 ti N° N y yp E E E E W< -�J < C << ai 2 2 0 :2 C 4' O E O E 1 F 11 4- c1 will N Q W E U cu 9 LIE er a- 0 M c 1 " L c F �� F c o o d p n Z S n V c a U E o c ca Y o O O ' n v L a L a� v rv d•O C 7 '� C � Z n = = `tri 0 L, O O �v°. a O m O — O b O vOi fn O t� � O h O � O H fA C chi O h fA N N O r �i O O Yi O O fA O C fA O in O vOi Vl O F M N O } a o 0 0 0 0 o c c o M 0 o Hf c N di o 0 in \ O } O O O O O O O O O O O O O M O O O O fA O C O O O O O fn C } G. N � I � N C } O fA OO fA O O C O O O v01 O 6A O fn O H O O O N N O Vl O O O v01 O M O f/3 O N C N O O O v0f O } L I O C e C T C Q fL y Y r Y •^ ., .^ C c mo Q C O O C E! e n 75 25 cU E' E3 E E_ = '> U •oE L y V v n C s O U c C O ori U GC C O U C O U $ G C y U Y U O U U U y 9 � a a Q e e o Iv c a > 0 EU eagG E °° 3 u0 U .QEa LIE er a- 0 M c 1 a) E C C o cEo Too V w as" -F°- a s v .°oma w w c n n N N N N M N _T Y � O � C Q L L L T H 'o o F k G k" 0 0 0 o c v v Yi v Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z LL E E c o _ u Q � e v ° U C' In n n. E n O ' W RS •O C � Z �. U � •o � o Lr. z C E L �' � i O O Y en C O F `5 o .O O H O a O F� a U O `Z � O ,C-, m 01 1 0 n 0 n 0 ry 0 o 0 e 0 g o o 0 c 0 0 c 0 0 c 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 x � 0 c 0 0 » 0 o o 0 c o o 0 00 Fn o 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 o c 0 c c 0 o Fn 0 (n 0 o 0 0 . 0 .. 0 0 0 O fA � dl fn in fA fA iA � M N � N } 4. } Li G O O (A O FA O O O (A O O C f/i C fA O M O fA O O C fA O O O fA O �/1 O f/1 O F/f O V3 O O O (n O V3 O O O VI O O O fA O O O N rN L�. C O fA d) O C M V3 O O _ (A iff bl fn fn O O ti Fn d3 !A ^ O N � O O O p0 O O O vi O fn p C O OC G bi O F/1 C O O O O - OO fA Vi C Vi c fA O O O h O fA O M O fl1 O fn O O h C } {L N •�C K C G C C fn O Vi O O O O O O O fA O � bi O vi O !n O fn O V1 O (n O bi O (A O iA C fA C fA C ° � C C C �• I G, LE _ C V V U E E E E u E E E s s c 3 c c 3 c c 4' o E L 9 L C •� c c C L n " .. y .. n N $ L Y c c o °0 0 g E d El He 2 u v u u= " ` o - o .E " °` m ° c° 'E v m c E m o �'� w o° eo o c G a E E E eo E co E cn c U s U n U Z U a U E u � 'E u' U E U n a E• n E h � c o L+. 0 _E c -E c °c o E G 3 +0 c cG. � W v01 (0n No Kv Jo J v .0 E ..0. vo Un. Ua UQ Un Uc 19 a) E 0 z r N O C p; a T y 3 G 9 L � y O i5 6 V � s Y n X 0 X 1.= rn _ =- C 0 0 0 O O O C O EmmOOtuO Ec c E c E c. E c c 0 0 0 0 o c Oat o 0 OatO 0 0 0 0 [u00 0 o n _ 0 0 0 0 0 vi vi r c c o c o vi o o �n c N ri o N �n ri �o �- cin in vi an an vi vi vj - 0 0 rn vi 00 o c vi o 0 0 o c o . . c o 0 0 H } O O fn VI c o 0 0 C OO O O rn O O O o rn 0 C O F/1 Yl vi o 0 N O O in M O C fA fn- Fn rn O O » o 0 � C O N 7' 0 0 0 0 v� N O O � O O N! in C 0 C O O O 0 0 � O O 0 0 F/1 Vl 0 0 � f/J 0 0 fn in 0 0 O Fn O 0 0 fA O O � N } {L N � � 0 0 O O 0 0 0 0 O O 0 0 0 0 ti 0 O O 0 O in O O C O iA in C O Vi fA O O fA V3 C O fA O O 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .n n C 0 0 0 o vi ec o n o .o E O 2 L n c E E G << " Ki Vl N '� N to d c..U'. y j c cn E E c �u a i a a' y y d m r i a W m o .m 12 �iww<C i z i F =Owwmoc nF° Me 00 It C U cu Q wla 0 7_ c � •o Y o a a a`w 9 T 7 � CD CD Cd CO a N u h y VI Vl U N v N N In Vl h fn VI N N fn h N — to - - - - - - - - - - - c c o 0 o c o 0 0 0 co o c c O E m O E 0 0 E 0 E o o o 0 O O O 0 0 0 O O c o0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o c o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o c 0 0 o c o 0 o 0 0 c g o o g o 0 0 0 O O OO O O O O C O 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O C O N V3 VI - - - - - - O O O O - O - Vf O O O O . O O . . O O O C O C O h M O T N N N N y N 6A O o C y N r w 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o c o c o 0 0 - o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 vi v+ �n �n o 0 c h 0 yr o 0 o vi 0 .n v> vi o 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 Fn vi o 0 c o 0 0 N p Vi N to N fA to fA N N } � w O O O O OC O O O O O O C O O O C O O O O O 0 0 d3 i.9 O. O O O O O N M O-- O O- O H O O O C fA - O O O O C O O H � � } w 0 �n 0 Fn 0 » 0 0 fn o 0 0 v� o 0 0 `n v3 0 0 » vi 0 0 o vi 0 0 » �n 0 » 0 ur 0 0 d♦ o 0 0 » o 0 c o 0 0 0 v 0 o 0 0 0 0 o 0 c o o vi C fA � N f9 r w OO O O O O O C O fA O O h O O O fA C O G o^ 0 0 o O 0 O O G O h C O o O O o O C 0 C O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O vi O N h O O vi O r O O O G O h O h N O u C c, o — C e p o a c o cu c h y, m c w c E v o 2� m O O �• 0� g Lt] VJ .0 ��e• O G O v Y D C •^] `�_ m J J C C L 49 >> ww m p n n w 3: , I g ?� a du,- o w G U y c U, cv - - 9 uw : Lc U u0� n K u v co m! U U U E 3 3 3 •5 C C D= c 7 Z o3i 7_ m' m' m m F w w u�i U Z Z Z Z f i Z Z .W -t U 2 z ii F Q ^C W E U cu Q 0 z � � T C � O Y O � G L d a � Cyt T 'O W � a y = = v = LU L` g co 0 o O O O 0 0 0 0 0 C C C 0 0 V1 N O r � F 0 0 0 0 0 e n c N } v. v! O O O O O C O O n C C h N �C v1 b ' 6A H3 a N dt Fn O O N N C O � O O r N } � � iL O O O O O O O � O V) Vi } O O O d! 0 fn 0 0 fli O O O D` O } O O 2 2 e c e o :a c c 0 � c 7 c c 0 0 0 = 5 5 a o c_ c c u tv 6 C t t t7 vii U Ulu Fo- ALF ►i -1--a c a) E U ca .F.r Q u''vi uuZ3 c' 2.1c �a ui�.�°. aN �i,o en y- o 0 aa 0U 0U — y c' o0•�oU� 3 c P r Z=— L O •O O+ u N 'u C O D y 5 O h u 0 n C L N L N N d N U N h U L O 7 K G 0 3 V — � N T Y o ' aL L` w 9 >. 9 o ti v � O J— C U U L C m G L O F O O Q` r vi �p r N O O O O O O e 0 r Q. M 0 N r cz c o o 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O H O c (n iA i9 f0/i bOi } {i N } O C C O O O C N fJi 00 O b O O Vi O fn O fli O O O O O T N b oC O• O N r L vi �c in fn n d) o o � (n n � o o (A r ri fA 0 c c 0 4 0 •� a c c c m o o Q O t C C v it i v 2 c to C C 5 K� m O C O n a 0 'y o3 2 z o c _ = n •- E a. < en > o 3 Eo ►i -1--a c a) E U ca .F.r Q !-4 � o< •y _h O W Cy m E< 0 �p y 7 •� O o� � d d o Y � .� c v o IM C • o C = a ♦ 6 a � T ti 3 o e j p; 5 9 T 7 } W W } } }} 'z z z } z z z z T Z } } W W W W W Yi W W W W W 0 C 'r� 711 CEO 3c° - a O O i r+ i 0 a O IN a O iI OI O a a 0 o c vai 0 c o in 0 o 0 » 0 0 0 0 0 0 v`^'i in 0 0 0 0 0 o � Fn 0 0 c vs 0 0 c vNi 0 0 0 0 o o �i v3 0 0 0 v`^'i 0 0 0 Fn 0 0 0 v�Oi 0 0 0 o 0 0 vri � o c o vri r P P n n c Y 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 OO W N } W c o 0 0 o c o 0 o c o 0 � c 0 iA o 0 0 0 0 fA 0 0 0 Ni N ry Y O O O (n O 0 C (n O C o 0 0 O O C O C C O fn 0 Fn 0 0 41 fn O fA O O M O O O� O O O O O O � �0 C O O O a 0 � W N i W O O O C O O O O i 1 O O O -t. r M1 O a 0 O O 00 O h O O O_ O O C O O O C O O C O h O O C 0 O 0 0 C O 0p � a W V t Y Iv c �• 9 3 o o z a r n 3 J- C ,c n a uE L- ci] u] w E U N .� .. �c ocO U c E o x y .G .'F- 3 g t i E r c ti N vW E 04 04 aEE G o U 3= c U a O e W m72d d N ti m v o a W a � 3 a c m r�.O en `O r`.O r? � 3 v v eeu s' .� � Y• a O D m o c E o 7_m c !-4 0 L n K 4 J E G G _ oEz � � T e . G a � T � i z } z z z z z z z } z} } } z Z Z z Z z d E G E G E G E 6 E G E O Y Y Y Y Y c a V U V N .'n.. Vl G c to N c V U V V y h C y y C — a E v E v — — E E �_ o rr` Z` °' — E d .0 C C C •C C '� O 'Q —11 .-. 6 - u y y v UIi UIi OgUO< 5 < 5 O O < 5 <Ua Ua .7 UIi Uv: ,70 <' j0 < O O O Y Y O O R M O e 0 O O o O 0 0 0 Oc 0 O 0 O o O a o ac O FA n c O V df Fn o h O r fA r oe di v+ r � �O o N e{ O O C 0 O 0 0 C 0 O 0 0 vi O N o vi rn O n fA trC yj to N ryry � � c c r x H � � C O O O O O O fA st O K (/� Ot O G fn Vi O (n O (n O� fn C fA 10 •Ni O fA O fn O f/ O (n O Fn O O O fn O O O O H O O in O O fA fn N N o o ^ z r o — W O O O O C T OG C V O 7G O C O O O O O O O O O O N O O O O r fA vCf- N Y N r C• fA ` R M M N �O O O N } w 0 0 0� c o0 0 Fn r r fn a o vi vi o o fn o Fn Fn o vi Fn N O HI O ffl N Vt r h N �D � M R O fn Z2 h in 69 O } L O O O O O O O C in (A C O <n M O C O (A 0 OC 0 iA 0 - :OO i- ! C o - O C .. -- O in O ... - fA iA cOo fA fA fn C Q C } C O M O O Hi Ni h fA h iN/i 1 h fA O r C N h {r. C C C C C G C C C C C C G C - 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2> G 2 e 2 2= 2 2 v o Iy V oc U U .� o U c .�p v Iy o U o IU c :d o U U L o U U �^ 0 o U 0 0 U U N 0 0 U U E E W E 3 N N m m C < U E E `u v v •2, `� �� c � a' E E�w 3w y—m 3w Biu - E c U c U c U c U = E u s c y •w " ap c0 v Gp v id — � CO L CO 2 [] a v 'cn 'm 'eo 'an v 'y = 'eo 'eu 'y o o c o o in `L ,Z 15 z IL Z I!J Z {tl 3 O R [L] LL LU N U cu Q i z z C T • O C � a v G CL G T N ; a` c• .0 t {i Ii Z z z z } z z }} } 7_ Z 7 z z 7_ Z% Z Z. Z. Z Z Z J z O E Y u E Y E E E Y E Y E Y E Y E Y VJ d c n LL LL cv"D 4 m W `D LL lD LL le LL °1f.D LL m LL eD a_ Yi L u u u u u u v u U u — E Li. O C .• G 4. 4. ti _ ti. LL LL _ k Y .- _ G. v 4. d — _ C V W U •� _ 6 y li U ti {i N d _ G y LL d _ 6" G eyj y j 0 G j j j U ii p �7 'j U ci � U w :516 5 Uri! 5 7 :] U ii j U v°'. U w U �:• c 0 0 c o 0 0 0 0 o a 0 0 N c C o OO N o N 0 O 0 O 0 O o O c G o O of O o O o c O O o O 0 O 0 O 0 O o O N r h N NN 0 vi 0 0 o o C O O O 0 o v> rn c o w rn c (n o 00 rn Fn » 0 Fn o c O O c Fn c o O C O o » of o O O 0 » 0 0 o rn O O 0 `n o sA c cn o � sn N O N N O N e7 O O C Vi fA � Yl M fA 4NA N 4A VNi VI a O N! O O M fn O O M M C O C N O bA O OO fn N O O di O V1 O O O iA O 4A O F/ O Fn C O H M O f/1 O M O fn O (n- O OD DC 00 YJ C Q O O Hi 00 O O O O O O VNi O O O O O h O O M O O O M O O O. .. O O ., � O h OO O�N h N N N 00 N 00 M O {Ta LL c f/1 fn bA O fn O O 6A O — r•1 � Vi fA Vf Vi LA M O O � fn N fA O O O O F/J (n O O N r r O N N O — N } } W 0 0 0 0 a o o Q o 0 0 0 0 o c o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N [z N O M 4A iA � fn � � fA 43 fn 43 b3 43 V3 O fA O 6A fA N O M ^ } (L } � C OO O C O O 2.2 S42 c Z E o 2 2 2 u p '^ T p � p h uu u O .. U$ u O U u m u u v O E T a °• e Nw 3 d j a h o a E a E Q = m 3 C v d V) L E W O O (l 'E v u O m C O O C .E aGi C W .w W .0 c `� N u od W ° E E T o 4i 3,w c cD c xW 3 ❑ 3 F, aW aW UW � `E `u of `v U °' ya u] o cY7 �n0 a' Cw r- aU Of] Op :D Up uw Zri U rn Dd U ,t ;:r k M 4-0 fin' W E U co Q 0 0 0 0 o to » o 0 0 o c O O O O Vi H O O O O O ti 0 7_ CON r Y O i a � T y �x ti T 9 G ti W W ti ti ti ti ti [i fi tz U ` a3we�Ri-;3 fed 4-4l E E E E E E E E E E E 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 c o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 c 0 rn o vt rA 0 0 » 0 0 0 0 0 0 c r 0 o 0 o 0 0 � 0 0 to rn 0 0 n » 0 0 to » 0 » 0 0 » rA 0 0 rn o 0 0 0 0 � r 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 o c 0 0 o 0 o c o 0 0 OOC � V N 0 M 0 0 Fn fn 0 0 M fn 0 0 O fA O M O O !n to O O fA C N � C } O h N O h M Lr. O � O C O to O O 0 0 O O 0 0 O O 0 0 EA O O O 0 Ni 0 0 Hi X 0 0 0 0 O O O O c o e v> O O o+ O O n c a 0 » o c o c 0 0 o 0 0 c to o c n» 0 C 0 0 0 o O 0 0 0 0 o 0 o Y 0 0 00 00 0 � c � m 0 U n E 0 9 N O L 3 E ` y wpm G0 > 12 � tvi n%n -05 AS7z Em Ev: ZF Le k ;' kn M nC W E U cu Q co Q ^C W /E i U cu Q � c z ``�v`� f E aG T n O D; G r T •O >> O O O O O O Yi u. Yi L m z z z z z z } y }} 0 v a U F (= e N F c F F y F F `o o o y 3 •o � o € .o 0 O O v h O> I O 1 O 1in O O C F 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 c M 0 0 0 o o o 0 0 N c o c o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o o N N d' � � N N M N O (A 0 0 N N N N N N 0 0 O } 0. N � N C O in O N O (n O N O O O F/1 O O O N O N O N O O fn h O O C N } {i. O N O fn O d] O N O O O O O O O N O fn O N O O O N O O O C � N r G O } Cz. O C C C O (A O 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O N M fn C C O O N C O C O O O O O �O O O O O v01 O O N N O O O O � O O O O f9 O G G N N O O O O Yf C O O O o00 V N } C C - U'5.,U U U L U N N CO C E av' C ti- o o 1 e_o G< Z N Z o z° z •° tJ Z .B- G •Z n Z 2 2 e2 2 e2<- '"_ Z Ev, Eve e 2 CN 0 2 5 0� v o n `c ti 5 0 s >, c c s E s Et E fp E= r E E g V g n -2o y N O N u c E 7 E E E .� w G Z Z 7 47 U GF U GF U GF V GF N> OU til o W o F FF co Q ^C W /E i U cu Q z z QQ QQ yQ� s s qa a P. a F w q 2555 tiv�iS vii �" ❑t -Q- � p - 4- 3jj S 55225S�5522 d p FpQ. p V [i � Q L HQ _ �Q QQ QQ Q 25 5, € 8 8� R I QQ EO s s ❑t � p 3jj S d p FpQ. p V [i � Q L HQ _ �Q QQ QQ Q 25 5, € 8 8� R I QQ N J AI j+ c c � -- 2 _ 4 L So 5.5 f f 2 EO 6 � 4� 2• L P� 2 9 e Q F � E 4 @@ yy o �LA .� t •� u L v .3 R R .s 9 m E z z° z z' 5 5 Frd- E F 6 hp FRR 6 pQQ _ Q �q` ¢ gU• q Q QQ QQ Q QQ- Sa'E8 � � Sg� $ n g � �,r � L u�.•en x S S X J-1 E, S' n 88 8 8S 8 8 8 8; QQ M Q5� � b 8 8 8 8 21 t` EE 5 b - � 73 6 a Lo C6 2E� rc`ocg v� z E E a i• z° z° z° r r F 0 E F F= § § I n ISI p 2� 2 � � 2 - - � 2� � � 2 •' 2 E 2 a p p p j 4 cam" E � r E E � 6 - - _ � O y z3 z"3 till -I -l i - a Lo C6 IO 0 N C c `o r0 a of � O � N C d O `I O y > E d o � 0 c � E E a U Q o c a P c V Pepe N m ��o v fopQ � ^ 1 i i > > a :I i• z x' r S � ti 8 d 1 d d ❑ _ � • G � F Ike- Cq �$ w � 2pQ$ Qy E.'. � q� E Q_ %� QQ SE QQ � = QQ b g=�: Q� Zi � 25 L, y_�� E pp S pp_ QQ L; E Y QQ S Q�Q 4 4 S 25 S E d y .. - _ n E r L A E _ IO 0 N C c `o r0 a of � O � N C d O `I O y > E d o � 0 c � E E a U Q M cP� bP� bQ � �. L• z• r r � E 2s i• T i• i• 7 y } J Jy, yy L �c FQpE- QF 44 q ¢ � S Q Q� k 99 pp E QQ E 0 $ 88 25 � k 8 — 8 18 Hilx L _ U V RP LA M c p ` pit AtliE r i- I n ,r. k' f.• 5 5 3 s it A _ € -119 € $ 8 11 - IN € 8 8 t. 2 $ 2 2 X 4 2 h Q� ra`3u d $ _ C= G= 9 o v - - - 0 N Q E I I ' Z > - l'I r > sss A y y E E .�$ 2i E,SE = e S S „o$ 0 0 o Zl 8 8 $x 2 s w w w w w w w T C w w n w w w w 3 0 z �•C� C �� E Ai c e_eG a d d S � 8 _ - 0 N Q N N O^ O O O O O O O N^ V C, t'1 I` ^ tD O O O O V O O I� V K) ^ ^ N Nl O O N Nl O C O O O O O O O O O O V N^ V b V m o7 ll O �n N �o O M O O O C O C O O N b O O Cl C ^^ -^ b v! ^ M (- O Ki O Cl v1 O oo O b b 69 vi N ! V Vl O O O b O O 00 0, V ^ N O M M O\ V1 l� O b V1 V1 V1 V [� Vl ^ n G\ h^ .-- Q\ O Vl b^ M .--• ON M N 69 v1 69 O b O Vl V N O N O b h 00 b .••1 R 69 C, 7 In G9 G/i N !� DD O ... 00 Vl N I- I` .--� M �n W V O C7 O 0 N 7 .--� .--• finO N O ^ 09 .M-.^ I` 69 t` 00 69 69 6A 69 69 ^ 69 V1 fig N69 fH 69 o M F DD 69 69 69 b 61) 0 O 0 O 0 C 0 O 0 O 669 69 V) b C, .moi M V1 O h V1 O O O O C1 IA N O oo V1 O V V1 o C, N M I- V b C, V N N O 6,) N O b o O O O 0 Cl O O 0 0 0 0 O O M O O 0 O O O O 0 O, 0 69 00 n O o 69 69 O 0 O 0 69 O 0 69 69 69 O 0 O 0 O o 69 n 69 69 O C :» O C 69 69 69 Vi a V O M O w M O OO N M V I- M O Vl m C Cl V1 C, N C^ 00 NC>^ O N 69 o ON 69 N Gn- l� V1 10 N 69 V M N O O M 6H V V c M 0 0 ^ c, O O 00 1n N ul t` O O^ M O O V OVD M^ V1 N 00 I` O O N O p V O N r- n N Hi 69 M N M V IT O to M 69 N a V N 69 (A 69 69 69 .-- 69 Hi 69 M 69 O, 66 69 00 N)o V vi 00 M O O rl .r O G\ M M b O O O O I-- oc N I- O O O O C% C, M b O O N Cr O w vl r V V 000 10 o\ � k V r M I- I- H3 V I` ^ C% O 1, N 00000000000000000 fff V3 69 69 -••. 69 Vj Vj V 69 ON 69 C,0000000or 0u`n 69 00 O O 69 69 O O O O O O O O 69 N b 69 O O O O O C 69 H09 Ci 69 CD C 0 O 0 O 69 O O Vi 00 to M A O O O O O O 00 O In O I` O O O vl O b \ N vl ^ vl N 0 M 0 O Cl V v1 Vl R N Vl o cl t` n^ M C O\ V v h o ^ 0 O o n M N O u > E v u a3 O N u 69 c R 69 69 69 � f/i fA b9 r4 o 69 a cn 1n 3 3 R T E! C,4 '0R O 2. iy r R C N I yo >L w 000 c m 3 3 0 :? u C Oo0 69 b 0 0 0 69 0 69 0 O C. o 0 O 0 o 0 69 00 C, 0 b9 0 0 0 0 0 0 o Cl v V o 69 0 69 0 69 0 O v h O O 0 O o Vi v 00 h 0 0 0 0 0 Vl O O O O O O 00 O O N N ^ C� CD C' > CD Vi b � O ^ I` O 10 O O 00 \ N V7 O O C kn I% C, 1% C, CT N b 00 r- O C\ I" 69 V I- N G\ .-• 0 V 0 N 00 ? N N bq M -• b N tom) N 2.0 b O N 69 69 69 69 69 69 69 6969 69 V 69 w O 00O O O O o 0 0 61 00 V O O C\ O o 0 0 I� O O O 1n 6A b O 00 69 69 O O O O O I` M N O O I` 69 69 O o N O 69 6A O .-1 ^ O N O C7 0 C7 61 o N 61 N O V7 O I` O 00 N N M N O O O N I` M 00 r- O M n V1 " O N N N V M N I- lel N N M I- 69 h O N 69 69 -- 69 69 69 - 69 69 69 69 69 N Hj 69 00 69 w N O O V 0 0 0 0 0 0 D\ b b^ I� ^ N O O O O M O O l� 00 p ^ 69 0 O^ M 0 O WA O O O O o O 69 O V b of N C1 b cl O vl N � V1 M O 0 O O 69 N f/i O^ C ^ N t` N m V O I� V O " h V1 O O M " " N viC, 00 b 07 O O O V ut ^- " N O vn N I- 00 O 0 00 O V1 „may C'I` nI` V V I- V h C1 M 69 69 N CT r- N 69 O M N 00 M M N^ 69 69 69 O� N E/j 69 M 69 W) VA Va -- 69 V) 69 b 69 69 V1 V c O C O 7 u ti A U •� 7 �' V o a W E o c E C F G W y d W r R o A E [u aCi v U > x O W W c W oui 0 0 u d Eto c R E E 7 L ti K V] E H t A OD c U O 0 Q v. V a CO '� u u w O c yr b CF a� ' y u °' E Q H rn o-- E '� A W E A a o ;? n. .w-1 o x aapammUAwW W WCC-ao��F���>3F 00In O O I` C, O O v1 V C, t'1 M to O O Cl C C1 nC V O O O O 00 D\ b N C, K) O �/1 C, O O N M N ^ N b O O O W C1 M 'C O r- N V O M b .w R ^ C\ DD C\ ^ ^ V V O O 69 69 69 69 69 69 69 ! M Gn 69 69 Oo O O O M o o O M 0 O 0 O 0 O 69 C7 O M N O O O O C7 O th N vi O In O N O O O N N N I- O M I- I- �n W V O C7 O 0 N 0 O ON 00 N N ^ 09 !` I` 69 t` 00 69 69 6A N 69 69 ^ 69 V1 fig O O o 0 0 DD o 0 00 b 0 O 0 O 0 C 0 O 0 O 00 O O O O b C, .moi M V1 O h V1 O O O O C1 IA N O oo V1 O V V1 o C, N M I- V b C, V N N O O N Gs V) &I 6V9 V) h r (A 0 0 0 0 0 b o O N 00 O O O O O N O O I, as N Vi Vi Vi O O O O O w M rq N M V I- M O Vl m C V 00 69 C, N N C^ M Iq NC>^ 69 N 69 M^ 69 69 N Gn- l� N 69 V M kn b N 6H 69 67 0 0 0 0 c, O O 00 b O O O O^ N O O V OVD CD V1 O O I` O O a0 O p N V ^ Vl b r- n N N b N C\ --^ M M N M V IT O to M W 00 N a V N 69 (A 69 69 69 .-- 69 69 69 M 69 O, 66 00 N)o O 00 M O O rl .r O G\ M M b O O O O I-- oc N I- O O O O C% C, M b O O N Cr O V1 vl r V V 000 10 o\ � k V r M I- I- H3 V I` ^ C% O 1, N fff V3 69 69 -••. 69 Vj Vj V 69 ON 69 0u`n L d A L a 3 O C u R R } O v G E O u > E v u a3 u 'u- c R �+ � u o a cn cEi 3 3 R T E! C,4 '0R O 2. iy r R C N I yo >L R 000 c m 3 3 0 :? u C o o E'm m m 0 o$ er o U w W -1 c. En In C/) !- F Indian River Court County Commis December 3, County Initiated Request Board of sioners 2019 Amend the Capital Improvements Element (CIE) of the Comprehensive Plan Purpose of Compreher Amendme 12/3/2019 Item 10.A.1. ive Plan Text t • To Recognize Changes in Existing and Future Public Facility Needs & Changes in Funding • To comply with yearly CIE update requirement of State Law and County Comprehensive Plan Policy 364-1 CIE Adoj)tion Process • Different from standard plan amendments • Requires only one public heari • No Planning and Zoning Commission review • No state agency review CIE Preuaration • Joint Effort By Several County Departments • Managed By Planning Staff • Directed By Budget Department 12/3/2019 Item 10.A.1. 12/3/2019 Item 10.A.1. Highlighted Changes • Updated Existing Revenue information and Updated Revenue Projections • Updated Appendix A, Indian River County Five -Year Schedule of Capital Improvements (CIP) • Updated/Revised All Tables, Figures & Corresponding Text Forecasted Revenue • Increased Forecasted Revenue —Continually improving market conditions • Programmed Revenue Sources fund all five years of CIP 44— 3 12/3/2019 Item 1O.A.1. Appendix A -Five Year CIP Schedule • This 5 Year CIP for FY 2019/20 to FY 2023/24 • Total 5 Year CIP Expenditures Increased-by.16.19% from $335,813,326 (last year) to $390,169,564 (proposed) • Projected Revenues will Match Projected Expenses • Level of Service Standards Maintained • Transportation nearly 50% of total expenditures (47.24%) Appendix A - 5 Year Capital ,Improvements Plan Expenditures BV Cate or - Elcmentjor Category 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22' 2022/23lr s 2023%24 { Total ' ... v .. ..-...:::::::::x:::: :::••::::.:::m:a•us::::::: Coastal M inngemenf i;ii $5 000 000 00 ;03:$20000 000:3::: ':fE §EE$0 S03f? €f;8?? 3iE Ei:E $0 3 -: _ t 14 e4:iS0 -$25000000 t0 ::.0 Conservahon &Aquifer : , e:I:Si€€S?'. $3439398 $1325000 52325;000.3:0;: $2725000,;Ed •;:.,- $I1 239398 . :::::..::::::- :: l mer enc Senlees 57421635 54650000 , $2145000 52700000 52,300,000 $19216635 g. Y..,... .. ..: ':,........ ::::::.......:. FacilitMtinagement > '' '1;:$7;850;000 $2 375,000„ 375000 $23485;000 i5E1 $1 775 000 - __ $18 060 000 ,.. .. ...........:........................................................:.:.... :::::::•:::::: ::: 4SmVIL�w:Enforcement & .:.:......:......:..:::•:::r :: 1:: 1 0 0^^i" 3 655 000 0' : $9 005 000 $200'000 $2.650,000:`;6; , $ 5 0 00 $4 $ , Cor,rechons ,,........:::: i. .:::...............: ..................... • ::::::................. :: ; ...a:::: 06:::000: 003:006¢::3 .:0:003:3 3t0 3o3::a0 :.3:a3::::::::::::::::: s:::; ::::::::.::; ::, :::.•.•:. Recrcilhtin'en S aces[a:....:..............30=.........,;;..:.........,......:::....;....;.............................;...,-:00;3; .•. p, _ p .... ,$4,962,878 $3 197 119-$2,080,000.;ii1:i ''•"0i$900,000 �;;;;;; ? $850.000 $ll 9899t:t97- , .....• ..... ::::: ..............•...... ,...,..................::; ...........................-.. 533..:........:....... ..... ::..... ..:::;..-: 772 723 $14 533 279 $F7 840 126 $4 440.18& $27092 233 $81 630 549 Wafer;, _:r_ L......,. amtary ewer' ota :::............................... ::::•• •.......... ............. i. 90'000'.iiE 3i^3 430 000:3031 ......:: 30'000 Pii3iii Ee¢. 1.250 000 :iiiii{$7 000 000 $14 300'000 ...::.::..::.........:..:... ........ ::.::::...:.:.:..:::::::::: ........ S:to. rmeaterMnnagemcnth..., $9;435;000 a E :5: S2$3 ' $_ .:. 229;3 ........:...::.. $200,000 3 425 000 , 0 . _,.� ...............................•.......................................... ........._ ortahtin: , Ttansp $40115°997 $38'158448•_••• $34928572 --$54,099,9(i8111;'1111SI7,000;000 :. $184302985 ........... ................... ........................._.............................................................................. ...............•..::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ..................:.....,.................................................................................-................,............... ,. _.............. ap:..........._., ............... 70fa1;393p9{;g; ;:;gp;;.cp;; ;; g:„p:3i333 633$9776T63PiE3 3$9J,920846:i ...,$65;533698;3EE :3F$73;055;156' it ":ii4E$58,892;2333i33 i?•$390;169;564: ::::::;::::::::::::::::r.::r.::::::::e:::::::_:::::: �:: ^::::::r:r•::a::: s::v::::::.::::::r.:::::::::::: ::r.::::::�:::s::a ^:iii:idi"r:e e3i:E.....::3u33:a....._ 3 5-_�i •:•:<:^:: {;F :•: 12/3/2019 Item 10.A.1. One -Cent Local Option Sales Tax • August 16, 2016: BCC directed staff to commit to spending 20% of the proceeds of the first five years of the extended one -cent local option sales tax on lagoon -related projects, if the tax was renewed by the voters in November 2016. First five years of "extension": FY 2019/20 to FY 2023/24 • November 8, 2016: IRC residents voted to extend the one -cent local option sales tax From December 31, 2019 until December 31, 2034 • CIE needs to meet 20% lagoon expenditure for the years FY 2019/20, FY 2020/21, FY 2021/22, FY 2022/23, and FY 2023/24 covered by this proposed 5 year CIP Lagoon Benefiting Projects Funded by 20% One -Cent Local Option Sales Tax Set -Aside FY 19/20 — FY 23/24 • Stormwater CIP: $13.05 Million out of projected $96.28 Million (adjusted for start of sales tax extension) in FY 19/20 - FY 23/24 sales tax funds allocated to lagoon benefiting projects • Conservation CIP: $1,600,000 out of projected $96.28 Million (adjusted for start of sales tax extension) in FY 19/20 - FY 23/24 sales tax funds allocated to lagoon benefiting projects 304-5 12/3/2019 Item 10.A.1. Lagoon Benefiting Projects Funded by 20% One -Cent Local Option Sales Tax Set -Aside FY 19/20 — FY 23/24 Recreation/Parks CIP: $800,000 out of projected $96.28 Million (adjusted for start of sales tax extension) in. FY 19/20 - FY 23/24 sales tax funds allocated to lagoon benefiting projects Water & Sewer CIP: $3.6 Million out of projected $96.28 Million (adjusted for start of sales tax extension) in FY 19/20 - FY 23/24 sales tax funds allocated to lagoon benefiting projects Lagoon Benefiting Projects Funded by One -Cent Local Option Sales Tax FY 19/20 — FY 23/24 Stormwater Projects • PC North — (Moorhen Marsh) North Relief Canal Treatment System = $8,050,000 • Sub regional Managed Aquatic Plant Systems = $600,000 • Osprey Acres Floway and Nature Preserve = $360,000 • East Gifford Storm Water Improvements including outfall to 41St Street Pond = $50,000 • Total Maximum Daily Load Utility Effluent Storage — Land= $1,800,000 — Construction= $2,190,000 12/3/2019 Item 10.A.1. Lagoon Conservation Projects • Hallstrom Farmstead Water, Sewer, Restrooms= $200,000 • Jones Pier and Preserve Wetland Improvements = $800,000 • Indian River Lagoon Greenway Wetland Restoration/Water Quality Improvement = $300,000 • Captain Forster Hammock Wetland Restoration= $300,000 Other Lagoon Benefiting Projects Funded by One -Cent Local Option Sales Tax Not Part of 20% Calculation • Numerous projects with secondary lagoon benefits — Road improvement projects that retain/treat stormwater that currently discharge into canals and indirectly into the lagoon 3(4 ' 7 12/3/2019 Item 10.A.1. Projected Transportation Revenue i- V 2019/20 FY 2020/2 1 FY 2021/22 FY 2022/23 Gas Tae $8,720,926 $2,375,000 $2,375,000 $2,375,000 $2,375,000 $18,220,926 Traffic Impact Fees District 1 $6,100,959 $739,573 $746,968 $754,438 $761,982 $9,103,920 Traffic Impact Fees District 11 $5,818,675 $1,382,654 $1,396,761 $1,410,718 $1,424,525 $11,433,333 Traffic Impact Fees District 111 $3,780,873 $749,774 $757,271 $764,844 $772,492 $6,825,254 Optional Sales Tax (60%, 60%, 60%,60%,6 0%). $39,617,252 $11,628,000 $11,860,560 $12,097,771 $12,339,727 $87,543,310 Street Lighting MSBU $50,000 $0' $0 $0 $0 $50,000 VLE Assessments $700,000 $0 $0 $700,000 $0 $1,400,000 Subtotal County Funded $64388,685 $16.375.000 $17,136,560 $18,102,771 $17,673,727 $134,576,743 Developer Funded Construction $3,700,000 $900,000 $1,750,000 $1,400,000 $0 $ 7,750,000 FDOT Funded Construction $8,425,409 $11,025,607 $6,996,598 $15,528,628 $0 $41,976,242 Total Revenue $76,914,094 $28,300,608 $25,883,158 $35,031,399 $17,673,726 $184,302,985 Transportation Projects Completed (FY 18/19) or Under Construction • 58th Ave. Reclamation & Resurfacing — 26th. St. to 491h St. (adding bike lanes) • Indian River Blvd Sidewalk — 37th Street to 53rd Street •45th St. Beautification Phase II — Culverting Canal and installing sidewalk (GNP Action 7.3 & 9.3) • 43rd Avenue, 49th Street to 53rd Street (new road, developer funded) -CR-512 Resurfacing from S Myrtle Street to 125th Avenue •Signalization of Indian River Boulevard & Grand Harbor Drive •491h Street Resurfacing from 31St Avenue to 58th Avenue -Old Dixie & Highlands Intersection Improvements 12/3/2019 Item 10.A.1. Transportation Projects Already Bid or Soon to be Bid (Construction costs listed in 1St _year) • 43rd Ave./SR 60 — 18th St. to 26th St. (4 lanes) •43r6 Avenue Sidewalk (Airport Drive West to 41 st Street) — GNP Action 7.2 -58th Avenue Resurfacing — 57th Street to CR 510 (includes left turn lanes at 69th Street and adding bike lanes) -CR 512 @ Roseland Road, (southbound to westbound right turn lane) •Signalization of Indian River Boulevard @ 81h Street Other Major Non -Transportation Projects • Two New Emergency Service Fire Stations (Replace #7 and New #15) • North Sebastian Septic to Sewer — Phase II • Sebastian Highlands Septic to Sewer • AMR/AMI Meter Conversion (Potable Water) • Design, Permitting and Construction of Cell 3 of Segment 3 Class 1 Landfill • New Court Room Facilities • New Roofs for Various County buildings • Corrections Medical Housing and expansion of Recreation Yard Facilities • Sheriff Facility Improvements and Needs Design 12/3/2019 Item 10.A.1. Summary • Increased forecasted revenue • Project time frames extended, and project costs modified • Level of Service Standards maintained • 20% of the extended One -Cent Local Option Sales Tax in years 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 allocated to lagoon related projects • CIE is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan • CIE is Financially Feasible Recommendation That the Board of County Commissioners approve the update to the 5 Year Capital Improvements Program for the period FY 2019/20 — 2023/24 and supporting data and analysis of the Capital Improvements Element (CIE) of the Comprehensive Plan by adopting the proposed ordinance 3(4-10 1D.C, I MEMORANDUM TO: Board of County Commissioners FROM: Dylan Reingold - County Attorney DATE: November 18, 2019 RE: Public Notice of Public Hearing Scheduled for December 10; 2019 Concerning Extension of Temporary Moratorium Regarding Biosolids The Board of County Commissioners will hold a Public Hearing on Tuesday, December 10, 2019, at 9:05 a.m. or as soon thereafter as the matter may be heard, to consider adoption of the following: AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AUTHORIZING AN EXTENSION OF THE TEMPORARY MORATORIUM FOR AN ADDITIONAL 180 DAYS, OR UNTIL A COMPREHENSIVE REVIEW OF THE IMPACT ON THE COUNTY'S ECOSYSTEM IS COMPLETED, WITHIN THE UNINCORPORATED AREAS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY PROHIBITING LAND APPLICATION ACTIVITIES OF CLASS B BIOSOLIDS; PROVIDING FOR ADDITIONAL STUDY AND POSSIBLE REGULATION OF CLASS B BIOSOLIDS APPLICATION ACTIVITIES; PROVIDING FOR EXHAUSTION OF ADMINISTRATIVE REMEDIES; AND PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY, REPEAL OF CONFLICTING PROVISIONS, AND AN EFFECTIVE DATE. The public hearing will be held in the County Commission Chambers located on the first floor of Building A of the County Administrative Complex, 1801 27`h Street, Vero Beach, Florida 32960. /nhm 365 6, c.z, ilia Syror�_1121Bali kyji TO: Board of County Commissioners FROM: Dylan Reingold - County Attorney DATE: November 22, 2019 RE: Public Notice of Public Hearing Scheduled for December 10, 2019 to Consider Adopting an Ordinance to Amend Section 205.09 of the Code of Indian River County The Board of County Commissioners will hold a Public Hearing on Tuesday, December 10, 2019, at 9:05 a.m. or as soon thereafter as the matter may be heard, to consider adoption of the following: AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AMENDING SECTION 205.09 (SALE AND CONSUMPTION OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES AT DESIGNATED RECREATIONAL FACILITIES) OF CHAPTER 205 (PARKS AND RECREATION) OF THE CODE OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA IN ORDER TO ALLOW FOR CONSUMPTION OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES AT THE GIFFORD YOUTH ACHIEVEMENT CENTER SUBJECT TO THE TERMS OF THE LEASE; AND PROVIDING FOR CODIFICATION, SEVERABILITY, REPEAL OF CONFLICTING PROVISIONS, AND AN EFFECTIVE DATE. The public hearing will be held in the County Commission Chambers located on the first floor of Building A of the County Administrative Complex, 180127 th Street, Vero Beach, Florida 32960. /nhm 366 (0,C, 3. INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA MEMORANDUM TO: Jason E. Brown, County Administrator THROUGH: Roland DeBlois, AICP; Interim Community Development Director FROM: Bill Schutt, AICP; Chief, Long Range Planning DATE: November 21, 2019 SUBJECT: Notice of Scheduled Public Hearing for Upcoming Board Meeting It is requested that the following information be given formal consideration by the Board of County Commissioners at its regular meeting of December 3, 2019. DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS: Please be advised that the following public hearing item has been scheduled for Board consideration: December 17, 2019 Consideration of an Ordinance to Amend County Code Chapter 308, Indian River County Housing Assistance Program [Legislative] RECOMMENDATION: The above referenced public hearing item is provided for the Board's information. No action is needed at this time. 367 giV ER c Consent OG2 Dec 3, 2019 Office of the * INDIAN RIVER COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR Jason E. Brown, County Administrator Michael C. Zito, Assistant County Administrator MEMORANDUM TO: Members of the Board of County Commissioners FROM: Brian Sullivan Legislative Affairs & Communications Manager DATE: November 25, 2019 SUBJECT: Letter from the Indian River County Board of County Commissioners thanking Governor Ron DeSantis for his attention to high speed passenger rail safety BACKGROUND In response to fatal accidents along the Florida East Coast Rail Corridor, Governor Ron DeSantis recently asked the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) to look into the issue of high speed passenger rail safety. The Governor's directive follows a letter from the Florida Transportation Commission to FDOT which brought forward concerns regarding high speed passenger rail safety from citizen advocacy groups in the state. Senator Debbie Mayfield and Representative Tyler Sirois have filed legislation which would clarify the authority and duties of FDOT with respect to high speed passenger rail systems throughout the state of Florida and which would also implement certain safety standards to be followed in the construction and maintenance of those rail systems. FUNDING N/A RECOMMENDATION 368 The safety of Indian River County residents and visitors is paramount and the County is committed to ensuring any high speed passenger rail system traveling through the County is equipped with adequate and efficient safety measures to prevent injuries or fatalities. In order to achieve this goal and ensure these safety measures are implemented, coordination between local stakeholders, the Legislature, the Governor's office, and FDOT is vital. Accordingly, County staff recommends that the Indian River County Board of County Commissioners prepare a letter to Governor DeSantis raising the importance of high speed passenger rail safety and thanking him for his attention to the issue. ATTACHMENT N/A 369 FLORIDA TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION Ron Howse, Chairman Jay Trumbull, Vice -Chairman John Browning Richard Burke Julius Davis David Genson Teresa Sarnoff November 4, 2019 Kevin J. Thibault, P.E., Secretary Florida Department of Transportation 605 Suwannee Street, MS 57 Tallahassee, Florida 32399-0450 Re: Rail Safety Concerns Dear Secretary Thibault: Ron DeSantis Governor Thank you for your leadership since returning to the Department in January of this year. Your dedication to the success of Florida's transportation network is evident as you daily lead the Florida Department of Transportation through this time of extraordinary growth and expansion of the State's population and roadway system. The mission of the Florida Transportation Commission (FTC) is to provide leadership in meeting Florida's transportation needs through policy guidance on issues of statewide importance and by maintaining oversight and public accountability for the Department of Transportation and other statutorily specified transportation authorities. As such, the Commission is interested in any, and all, transportation issues pertaining to our mission. An issue of statewide importance is the safety of all users of the transportation facilities across the state. Recently, the FTC has been made aware of concerns from citizen advocacy groups related to rail safety in the state. Florida Department of Transportation's role in oversight of passenger rail with respect to maintenance, safety, revitalization, and expansion is subject to the concerns raised. The FTC is aware of the 2018 General Appropriations Act, which directed the Office of Program Policy Analysis and Government Accountability (OPPAGA) to contract with FLORIDA TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION 605 Suwannee Street, MS -9, Tallahassee, FL 32399-0450 3,,0 Office (850) 414-4105 1 Fax (850) 414-4234 www.ftc.state.fl.us November 4, 2019 Re: Rail Safety Concerns Page Two an independent consultant to study existing and planned passenger rail, including high speed passenger rail, in the state. In order for the FTC to respond appropriately to the concerns raised, please provide the Department's response to the findings and recommendations of the OPPAGA report, including all related activities and responses to the OPPAGA report. Furthermore, please provide the detailed responses to inquiries the Department received related to rail safety concerns over the past 12 months. Sincerely, Ron Howse, Chairman Florida Transportation Commission 371 12, A, 1, INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA MEMORANDUM TO: Jason E. Brown, County Administrator THROUGH: Roland DeBlois, AICP Community Development Director FROM: Bill Schutt, AICP Chief, Long -Range Planning DATE: November 18, 2019 RE: Consideration of the Gifford Neighborhood Plan Annual Report Card for 2019 It is requested that the following information be given formal consideration by the Board of County Commissioners at its regular meeting of December 3, 2019. DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS From May 2013 through July 2014, the county performed an update of the 2002 Gifford Neighborhood Plan. The updated plan was adopted by the Board of County Commissioners on July 15, 2014. That plan was the culmination of a grass roots effort by the Progressive Civic League of Gifford, Gifford residents, and Indian River County to improve the quality of life and economic conditions for Gifford residents. Through considerable interaction with residents of Gifford at community meetings, county staff prepared the neighborhood plan which presents a strategy and a series of actions to address issues, concerns, and opportunities identified by Gifford residents. Approval of the plan committed the Board (as well as other responsible parties) to undertake specific actions identified in the "action plan" section of the overall neighborhood plan. . Action 1.5 of the plan states the following: "Each year, through .2020, the County Planning Division will provide a Gifford Neighborhood Plan 2014 action plan/implementation plan "report card" to the Progressive Civic League of Gifford and will present the report card to the Board of County Commissioners at a Board of County Commissioners meeting". This report and the attached implementation matrix "report card" constitute the fifth annual report card for the Gifford Neighborhood Plan 2014, and has been provided to the Progressive Civic League of Gifford. The Board is now to review the attached Gifford Neighborhood Plan annual report card for 2019. 372 ANALYSIS The Gifford Neighborhood Plan 2014 is a 108 page plan that contains an introduction and description of the planning process, data (existing conditions), analysis, action plan, implementation and funding sections, and appendices containing reference information including a history of Gifford. Following its July 15, 2014 approval, the plan has been implemented as specified in the plan's action plan and implementation sections. • Action Plan The action plan section (strategies, objectives, and actions) is "the heart" of the neighborhood plan (attachment # 2). As structured, the action plan contains 15 objectives that relate to major issues and topics identified during community meetings. Following is the list of the neighborhood plan objectives in the order presented in the plan: 1. Communication/Coordination 2. Housing Rehabilitation/Property Maintenance 3. Demolition/Repair of Dilapidated and Unsafe Structures 4. Housing Ownership 5. Economic Development/Employment/Technical Training 6. Illegal Uses, Non -conformities, and Land Use Compatibility 7. Sidewalk Improvements 8. Street Maintenance 9. 45th Street/ MLK Blvd "Main Street" Beautification and Improvements 10. Traffic/Safety Improvements 11. Drainage Improvements 12. Street Lighting 13. Park Improvements 14. Funding 15. Crime Prevention/ Law Enforcement. Under each objective, there is a set of specific actions that contribute to meeting the objective. Each action item identifies a specific action, a responsible party or parties, and either a completion date (year) or an indication that the action is to be implemented on an on-going basis. Responsible parties identified in the action plan include: the Planning Division, the Public Works Department, the Parks Division, Code Enforcement, the Progressive Civic League of Gifford, the School Board, Indian River State College, Road and Bridge, Traffic Engineering, Indian River Farms Water Control District, the Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO), the Health Department, the Sheriff's Office, the County Attorney's Office, and the Indian River County Chamber of Commerce. Overall, the plan contains 82 specific actions. Community Development Department staff has coordinated with all responsible departments, entities, and the Progressive Civic League of Gifford to ensure implementation of the plan's actions. As shown on the attached "report card" matrix (attachment # 1), of the 82 actions in the plan, 33 had 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, or 2019 due dates and all of those actions, except one, were completed or are in progress. 373 There are three actions with either 2018 or 2019 due dates that are in progress; one element of one of those actions (Action 7.3) is on hold and is re -stated below. "Action 7.3 and 7.4 — By 2018, the County Public Works Department will repair, connect, and construct the sidewalk along 45th Street, from 43rd Avenue to U.S. #1 and by 2021 along 4511 from 43rd Avenue to 58' Avenue, where necessary right-of-way is available (has been acquired). The County will seek to install segments of a 451h Street sidewalk between 43rd Avenue and 5811 Avenue prior to 2021." As reported at a 2017 PCLG meeting, and as reported to the Board that same year, the 45th Street sidewalk connection to U.S. 1 in the vicinity of the railroad is not possible at this time due to the timing of All Aboard FloridaBrightline proposed improvements that preclude sidewalk construction at this time. To be re -considered as All Aboard FloridaBrightline improvements move forward. This action is currently on hold. With respect to items 7.3 and 7.4 of the Gifford Neighborhood Plan, Public Works continues to pursue the three intersection improvement of 41St, 45th, 491h Street and Old Dixie and US -1. The County recently met with Virgin Trains regarding the railroad crossing and the design proposed by Virgin Trains. We have provided the plans to Virgin Trains Engineering Team and they are evaluating the plans for incorporation into the Virgin Trains Crossing Plans. A sidewalk between 43`d and 58th Avenue does not exist. Design of this segment of 45th Street roadway and sidewalk was awarded on February 6, 2018. This item may be completed ahead of the 2021 date. The two "in progress" actions are Action 10.2 and Action 11.8. Both are re -stated and discussed below. "Action 10.2 — By 2019, the County will signalize and/or improve the 581h Avenue/451h Street and 58th Avenue 49th Street intersections, if adequate right-of-way has been obtained. The Progressive Civic League of Gifford will assist the County during the right-of-way acquisition process." The completion date for this project should be changed to 2020 as the project will be completed by a developer in that year. "Action 11.8 — By 2018, the County's Public Works Department will coordinate with the Indian River Farms Water Control District (IRFWCD), identify any appropriate safety barriers along canals in Gifford that are warranted by accident data and that the District will allow, and report its findings to the Board of County Commissioners and the Progressive Civic League of Gifford. Findings shall include an evaluation of culverting improvements associated with Action 9.3." The completion date of action 11.8 was changed last year to 2019. This action is currently in progress. Public Works is currently working to identify appropriate safety barriers along canals. There are 43 ongoing actions in the plan that require periodic implementation. All 43 ongoing actions have been completed and continue to be implemented (100%), including on-going communication between staff, community leaders, and community residents. 374 Larger projects called for in the action plan, such as the 45th Street beautification project, were completed ahead of schedule. With that project, staff from several departments "stepped up" to obtain funding, design the project, obtain easements, adjust or expand project scope, and implement construction of improvements. Since 2014, a limited number of action items were delayed for specific reasons as approved by the Board. For each of the few items delayed, new deadlines are in place. Some actions were completed ahead of schedule and some items were expanded in scope during implementation. Finally, some significant improvements have been made in the Gifford area since 2014 that are not referenced in the Action Plan. Such improvements include projects at the Victor Hart Sr. Complex. Following is a summary of the implementation of the Gifford Neighborhood Plan actions. Action Timeframe # of Actions Actions Implemented Actions in Progress or on hold Actions Not Due Yet Ongoing 43 43 ---- ---- Completion date between 2014-2019 33 30 3 ---- Completion date after 2019 1 6 16 ---- 6 Total 1 82 1 79 3 6 FUNDING Implementation of the Gifford Neighborhood Plan 2014 will continue to require use of various current and future funding sources. Funding sources include the General Fund, gas taxes, sales taxes, the MSTU, grants, and other appropriate funding sources. Beginning in 2014, larger projects in Gifford were incorporated into the County's Capital Improvements Element (CIE) and that practice continued in 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018 and is included in the draft 2019 CIE update. The Board will consider the full CIE update on December 3, 2019. An updated copy of the draft Gifford Neighborhood Plan Schedule of Capital Improvements 2019 is attached (attachment #3). CONCLUSION The neighborhood plan's "action plan" section contains a total of 82 actions; each action is related to an objective and is structured to identify a specific task, a responsible party or parties, and a completion date or indication that implementation is on-going. For the 2019 "report card" period, all actions with a 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, or 2019 due date and all ongoing actions have been completed or are in progress. Where appropriate, updated completion dates have been added to certain "in -progress" items as described in this report. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners review and accept the Gifford Neighborhood Plan 2019 implementation report card. ATTACHMENTS 1. Implementation Matrix "2019 Report Card" 375 2. GNP Action Plan (strategies, objectives, and actions) 3. Draft 2019 CIE Gifford Neighborhood Plan Items FACommunity Development\Gifford Plan\Staff Reports\GNP 2019 Report Card- BCC agenda item 12-3-2019.docx 376 2 t. ^O Q W O �U � C +� O � v V1 Q, C � d 0 Q 0 Q 0 Q 0 Q 0 Q 0 Q 0 Q 0 Q 0 Q 0 Q 0 Q 0 Q 0 Q to to to bl) O O O 0 0 0 O O O O 0 to 0 O H to o to 0 �rl 0 0 r. 0 0 to 0 O 0 t 0 to 0 0 0 0 to � O N 4. C O Q GJ CA V, O GJ O N O N 0 0 0 N UJ N N N N O U IE �+ �a .� o � o It., o •= o Ir. o oor.�oct h o 0 o�- 0 U UU u UUUUUUUw UwUwUw Uwc7¢ 0 0 ° 0to o y� CL w� y � 0� �' a�� W W� W o o� � E fl U CA .b u 0W o w o co �WN H o °� N 0 o U o U 0 U 0 0 0 a O U o °WWUrn UQU o UWU w A O V M t1r) 00 mN t/•) N_ M r r M 00 t- en O 'b rA 'n v a� O Q O Q O Q O Q O cn Q Q O Q O Q O Q O Q O Q O Q O Q O Q O Q O Q bA bA bA bq bA bA b4 bA bA bq bA bA b4 bq bq bA O bbo O bl O to O tQ O b�q O O O tD O th O b�A O O bbD O t-0 O b�A O to H O O O O O bl O t O O O O O O O O t O C 'O 0 0 0 0 to 0 � � U v1 a a a as a a :o :o :O bA M bA bA a ix W� a a a a a a a a a a a a.a a bAa to Q y a a��3 0a"o Cc) 0 a w U � � N ., ct C7 `° O N s; �, O y. ��, W U v bA O N t/) O �S", O ��..;' O iZi �a a% •�"-� 4� cd 4-i '" ��. .. � O m, °� .semS". o b o N o Qi �J bD • v� rA 0 kr) 00 t- en o� M _ oU� `-' Cd bq � bA � rA .o o «S x � ++ 3r 00 "rn 0 G� O cto V �P-W o x� �00� CID U O O s Cj N .Q N 3 :i C) O � +•' U U N U U U U U U U U U U U U Cd r U) v O Q O Q^"Q O O Q O Q O Q O Q O Q O QQ O O Q O QQ O O Q (1) ^� 010 xa Mtixcn bA bA bA bA bA bA b() bA bA bA bq bA m to it S"•�i"r �-i fir" �," L: L: L: S"+ , �' %' G: �."f-i i-� O bOD O b�A O bbA o ti) OO U) bbD o bo O to o 0 bOA O to O O mrl O b�A o H O O O O O O O r. O 00 O O O O O i� ctU � � O O O O O O Q" o �a"'� w�aa �d as a a cxv� P-4 i~i i~r i~ 14-E W rQ •r,n o a4 PQ Al O O O �+ ii ir bA bQ bA bq b0 r3 �+ cC cC 0 cz b cm V) ..� S m ct 03. yU 'j - Cd O c�C o Cd O N N ;z C� w a a a a a a P. ri a; unon cn a, >1 co U 'C ot: Q U cn 4 cn� U Cd 'O m a m con `+ i onZ ' W PL ., o� ° 3 m�� c a, cn o bA �. O 7:$ Cd° .,_, ° a as :; �? �; U U o .� 3 -v G,1 '� •� �s..o b •� � ° •� � � � 0 � 0 � � 0 .° -o u o � Q w 0 a404 w4�:!C7P-�c��lUv�x. f�i� wC-��wWW> d�1 DC7 A O V) N � M •-+ �-� .-•� V) 00 00 00 .�-i . M o� M O 00 M Y w U b�A O d CAO O CZ}� O � � ,� � .O � • O oq m w OCd 'o I Cd O •rn c� � V4 a) o O 3 a CO UO 4" s w U O tt U A .•i �..yy 0 W u Q V_•-' (� O Q •O O U U � ,> C,3 m V0 0 on 0 C Qct y Q' ��. �1�o�GA3.�0 Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q bA v) to to H N N 0 N 0 N 0 N 0 N 0 N 0 N 0 N O � p„o Q a� U cl,a� -0 a -0 a - o a� L7' PC O N Q O U N •.�-� .� 0 U sir iia O O O U UW a a UUUcn W bc � � .fl o o o C40 _O 0 42 Q. •� .� cqj -0 �:s (� 0 � CLII) U � C',W (:d C,30 °^ w °' o �0 a o o Otc N '° 00 D a pco P4 VD Qct .� P. .°' r-)( 'l� W �cn a 0 P"', 0 Uri 0 O 00 M 00 M O � � M ON O O O O O O O O O O (:� O U O U O U bA A v-, to kr) kr) kr) vn 00 H 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N N N N N N N NCIO N N N N N .w p rA 0 Q C/�] ° O O o CA v W a ,� C�v� � vat a � a � a aavaQa CA ri) co CA o� bi) bi) �•� m ca m bo 0 °4.1 ° cz o -d ; -" O s� o tn M � a� E� o° ria o `' uCA x Y U aoi �C/a ca d �'M ut' CZ�a°� �� ° �• °va Ct 40. U U cd M M� 0- a b > ~" �' 0 N O ria o � p a) M O M � oQ o-� > °� ��� o Cl. P, �.0� a� y o . b xcd ° � o o o 0o o y ,� ° o y (D � o o va �. -. ° ° a 00 O a>i U aO�i 4-4 .d O E� va �W c4w�r¢�Q�ddP,., uZ cn-t C7�-N Wva �� �C�Uva C 0 It \0 Vl N d C\ N N M o M N ' M vi \ kr) N 01 1 — .-r 00 M N 00 M M U Ud -. O, > Y ct F4 0 'y m " " � 'Op�q " ice " • � U O � .- cn O O N b `� Q" Q) a� C.)0.w b ° Q 'n ' m � v' U a �1 a' (Don s to a o 3 0 o oma" W rn O S�. 1 N¢ O -0 P. -o -d v� Vcd R 4 4-4 �' �+ cn 0 oC,3 N U > � O N N O �, O U r D U U i'" p N O c� O aD P. � m U p ^O y0i R! Q. �1 t1 Qr .d U G1 > p U ,� U -a C.)� C5' y 1401 $Ml V O O O O O O p �1 O 0 0O Q U U U U U o 6n ¢, w �. o O J� U F- Q wo A 00 00 00 00 .. N N N C)N N � � O O ai (2j co CJD M M U 'v, 0 0 0 0 En cn �Y an � b P-4 �Uci o m-d� 0 �j -E5U�a U V U Q b024 cd , bA O Q, cC °�° ° N . 73 O . . H � °Qwwc7Q�C, asd 0 N 00 M M 00 M crj 03..-� M ','"+ Ri ' VI iti 03 ::3 CZ 3.. u "o 06 clq to 4-4 78 �' cn 0 = E� cA E� on Oo ¢" �' cC .fl s1 y O cd bq rn iG it y o 4-4 -v o °�' ° o�n -v o ° co ' U a° U i� .� O •� 3-. O .� MC,3 M to v� "� M CJ NCIO tb �" _ .� cd U ~ • �� —U O bA ° _In U to O N S� U aS iU U U U H .., -- cn Q U U U 04 � NI N 'C • O\ O� O C1 O N N O N O O ' N N N N O N C � Q U W W U U •� O O O O O O O iY•,aa a a a a a a a U Q cn C4 U Fj bD 0 �� a O En . Vj N DC U Q (� S. ctl O N U 00 kn in GJ d > M U C/)P U V] G O c� ti nom, O O O 40, m�� cn �U, N U U v1 v� U U �bA N O C�j cn N dM tD cn y Q t"r O ej00-- M 00 M V. 00 M + m%�" i -i Cd Cd C/) > N " ¢ cd O C NO ^� ~ �, >, O N m m -0 3 � p N ° ° U P. o � � N 0 O N o cid •� � � � � U a..`:: N � � � � "p O U .' 'C U O� m t4;;p. ^rj Q v _O °� 3 .o cz C,30 o -4.0 4r, a) cd ° ° .-� cd O U `d r° pp 0 N O V ti = .w N y C, V CJ � .r O N yr GJ } ., Ocl � U y o 3� O .� O O N ;:s r C N N N � .p 4: N .s= bA cd y 0 C'4 > G � iUi O N O .-� N � �c°nZ � � 'n �. Ua-���� O O xZ� FW�yD • rq H 0 N C:) N C N C:) N � � o � 3 o v� a, U C� W U Q a a a 0 0 a� O O C 4.1 bA O U O Q -r, j O Q t" O C cn Z M cd N cn U n Q C,3 tj d, m o ¢ kCIO b U .d > ai CA O r.Q. j •v H iw v P. r� � � a � A 0 v v� 00 00 V. 00 M MSI M E o mE C No Lt 0 Cd o •� awn 'I'l 0 o ° 0 ca an � Eb 3 CZ ~ W 61.31 ri o 0 ~ �r M U U V q O O O 'b O o 0 U � O rA zy 0, w0 w N Q bo M `° w -�F b 'o >•0 O O O O O v U QJ el ~ O •~ N U bA � � v� N �U O u, ,rA o o� �0 'or� Oiv N�••r Cd z 0 � d cd N � -0 . En °o 03 ocz cd an �, � •� ~ o o o o Ell ° cn 0 o zCdCd y . as •� O t+ O U as v U Cwr -0 it V 0 i" cn O 0 COU O 0 .w-, °Cd O �; .O .0 '�G asU` .N .N -0 cd +' U � U � ° � � Ir.z to �0 ... � oo� z � ����UDcn '� �O �.~~ O;-, ,0 ° �° U a, U .� M c;tl U U C Cd c rA w -v m b w r, �� r o o0 v cd Cl cts v 3 Q No ° o .� o 'O N —03 O P-4 kn as CU Ct Q" O � 03 O 40 rA o o b o bin ° b i Ucz. a� a� �o �cl °°H WiQncn 4zi t, o ° 'O 4° . cn cd bb 40 4-4 as • � ca � a as3 o c cncd a c cd Q b o o C3 o a o o a to " o -0 t j �+ o E 411° Q% N O •.y /.' Q) �iM J .yo • 0 -0cn o un 03 ai p � 'L± � °� CC •L, CJ y � � y by •�, �-•� C4 � •—, cn "O �, ° �-, cC u °E O O O �, Q' cn •p i. Cr U ^C U O., 'v, U U o w '� cz cn y 0 O W .O c� O N O M d S •� +� y �? y O U U bA cC in m . U • ¢ .� O . Q U O N O O r� O O p .fl t+ TS O bOA +C� O GG Q Q uN C.7 C,3'n Q aU \,O N ao +, M E 4. 0 4. s7 0 0 cl zn u CIS °oCdbrio o •� w �° > . o o a•,�v. . w C"" •� O 4� v cid rn .. GL tom. O v' x A y �. crj rA •� O y � C G� O RS � � CL i. � O >, � O ° u O bA GL U U Ufa:. h OO �bA 3 y p° p .tU 4;4+w rA ''"' +.�+ ice. � v 0 � � R..b � � •Q' � C7 � ypy � cj rA 40 cn cz cd rA Z'Acd .� `� .d a� �•' � c •� � coe � � � � -o Q o � a. o }' ci C9 EA PC Po CZ CZ U C � at -• c� ..., b10 ca .-p a� 9, � EA ej JQ PW �jj � �4•rr O .N C". V O � Sr p ^� �" � Lri O r-+ � � � C/] i -•i .� ��" rh � ,� � � hLi U V 6V'i• :Zr W i -i"' ►-� bA .L it op N 'O (y N U O 0 o t- N oo }, M E 'C3 m 003 J, v� 'O p b p p + p ca rA is O° OrA C,3 O En Q) U03 O b O Q) p p OCZ N p b 4 a 'O p. N c� O O N -- p p is R ty j cC 3 rn O N C� G Q cid �, Q bA p gyp. 4-4 +� ° p bD O S], V] 3 O .d cd p p ° b co 42) cn p p .. cts o p o o -o V a cd N (� p ws. O p U 3" orA p �cn i po 0 4� Q N p 4� .'3 U p Cd U .� UD .� O ti 0 �cn � n � 0 N p O � 3 p 2 U «i O 03 rn� p M ;3 b cd " O cq3R O N Ni"-,0 O N 3 t : tp• b j, E ED0 0 O gyp, C � p p U0 ct C) a m �' c� p U '� 3 C) O V w up� U o b 0 3 o p '° U r i o°�°cn U U O ^C7 bA bA V NO t" p (V N N c� U O bA p �j _ O I I v I O M c I a �, s.. 'CJ cn p N N bAgyp, M '+� O y O O O �t �'O 0 0 0 0 U CZ U U V c)I WUa: 00 N 00 M � E U cu Q 0 0 A O=4* 4211 ct Ct a ,aio o ° c k ° O v N v 9 v� -dcncrj y0 y •G ,� a� .ter O . vii 'd bA 03 Q~� u CU Q o� z C)Q ,E,� our �u o o bin bo U U o o > ° >" toO �E w� 3 o U O CO •� .� �+ ..fir+" fn to bD CA 0°o o CAW O ti) ;> .�v 0ctj .� N V rn � p Lt 4-4 cli~ ~ y ice•, O ~ "' "dC U � � y c'O, � E � •� � y � H O � ,� �, � cOi 'A•� ° .. C,3 v c ocl 0 o � o W ° o a �°, 4., � C4-, o ct t. •� y .� 0 v U p O N Qj �"° cvc*� ori cl p" yo at 'm cc"i � o\ N 00 M � N E U cu Q on .. N ^" O cid s- L% Zi CdU W N Ca, U Q, d yU 'd O m U 4° O 4] 0 O .� Nct to 0 0M 4, o pcn rn to Rc U En cp O N N .fl 1� -t O s- r� cd co N U N 'b Cd 5 111 > o y ° cz ° U b U O• •• � s� "C1 73 U° y U s" > 'b O C U 3 U c � i�r v� Cid t N p '� N cn co U10 m rn 0 C4 cd . U O ' D b > cd3 O allcncd En Q" =r � .. O Zi U ¢ o U bn O El s, '. +, N H V'« U ° U uL U � cn Om .. u N N 44 N ,p 0 3U N N U ¢ [� .�" s . .sem O „� (� cd d H H O is I ,� Cd N M N 00 , cn N 3V, bn V7 C~d V7 V7 c!1 V7 N 0 Cl, If,Cd �" ��-� �". t". ""' �". t-. ice, �". �", �", c`' • Q, �", �", U O O O O° 'd O N O O O U O .�- U• .-, U �, U R U r3 U k U Cd U cd U y U o O b N 421 0 o U N o � � U U 42. �. "C7 �' N bo cn O (D D y. '. m (� O U to N N O O b bo o ° 9n a p 'O O N o ct cl t° 3 co 0 ° N En ° � '� � U 3 rX w Q) p~ ,� b Cd ° ar j a; 09 U W ° ca u O o • � on N 3 ,� 4-4 W � Cd 4 C7 �.� Dcz U cu El El ° rA "I� "a al 0 m CO 0 t" r r^1 ikj n (w^� 6 C% � = Z ° O~ °O o ir "C CCS 4" to Cl .� o o rA o °�' •� cc 4) >O >, O s v C a>b �� >z con (D a� M � i � a� ° o s . �, .. 4. a U Or. N Cd O rA �y O (�3 4•q %y rA 4-4 O O O W �y NWW/1l y y Vi Q �..i-1r Ui:� W U 6i rfiri O Zin ii C� ,N Qn Qn U 0 W5 bo 1_ y�j V�J Vel �Cl ''WA H c •o ~ v ° L 42 Ca a ww� Cd s O U ai tea«, L7��ena v "'O U U O p •� � 3 U 4M r, 0 .--� N N. Ct -�- -- GJ 'A i a Li it . V. �!" .. cC rA V u w ~ C7 3 w ° o a� o it r v� s� � 4-4 03 ° c A. ° 0 W .03 U O x o w � .. o a��i ^C ani .A U o cq N U U N 14 'y W I i o «3 I -o 3 y v c3 p +6. 00 �bn ice. O U Cl O� O 03 Q C's U cu El El N N 'Y p O0 03 cC - cn NCa N M O O N N — �bbrl. M C) w o . 3 P. (D o �, °) 3 0 `44 bq y0 v o O r �° (Dv °�' 3 000 :C3 07 0 I � a� 03 .d CO .o �� b L7 � Q O P d — U Q 3� d m M = N o N .ti `gin bA ' GJ N C/) s" to Qaj '� ti Ri .� O +moi 4-; U �3 xN c OO cd an o ci °'dam oM� Q (D d cd m a,� o C,3 o M Q o `tS:j u a� m Q (D cdo > GG a NW cid c C/� O cn U) O N ��. N O O r) r3 O M oo 'b O M O U Q. Q > Cd r3 N a! 0 N NC ^O 0 s`n. -- cn M O 3 b a 'o acd 1-:1 >, 10 Q, Q cri U �, U b� U'ri) U OU 00— 0 � . (D00 OC 3 v' o N cc -o U ICI'34 v a� cidCrj N ami' i; N W �' W o o W �, • m lzl- M M^ O O -0 M r. s0. •�i U N ;3�; OU 00 cn O V O bA O O O Q ON 2 W , � � C's � Q ..fl C G i U cu Q �M 4--1 O N bbq U ° N T C � O 3 ° • �, p a-�y U �y vUi .�+ goy O O a as� bA O 4� O O bA ' `n •� U O U O �/ • 'r U U � 00 rn -- N r r, o ... as > M to U x 'v C b � co Q � rA M tp U N p tO r� Q >] cn b co m ° CO O N ai N S a cCCO U o � o $.. U 00 .d M C/� C ct to 0 M O • :: U QU CC "d 03 C "G v m ,y UO U CCS as �° En tf) y m 4-4 t° bo 03 U rA a y o Q. U .fl U C7 U 4.1 No 3 ��° `�°•� o> o v N «3 N¢ N > N N O W a o En v i I I U M o I N OM d v 'C7 00 00 00 - 00 8 C�6 ? p c�, o o ct o o " _ °o 0 •`�' Q ice- Q Q Q Q C/] o Q Cf Cl) Q Q �M 4--1 O N bbq U ° N � O (D O O � � as� bA O 4� O O bA ' `n •� U O U O �/ • 'r U U � 00 rn -- cci N r r, o ... as .cd o o to U x 'v C b � co o - a, tp �M 4--1 O N bbq U ° cn in � m 0 U �' +U- 'd sU". 10 o cz o�, 3 O . d > U -0 � a� 0 day 40, � co ° ~ 03 ons o '° x a ( rn 00 � o 4-4 Go N ct 0 Q .O sem, N asC� N M O 03 bA v7 4 -co U 4-4 U �� U� c� 'C Off-+ O %. 4l; bA U Q oc in C13 cz cli En ct 14 cn o cz c kn P-4 o CA 03 U cz 3 0 >, u. C,3 r- o im oo. o � � 3 � o � � � o o � o 0 _ U o~ °Otn Ile `� b 4E fin ti O ~ •� '~ ., N ° �" ~ cv ~ H 4� U�1 o o ami I O t' �r N O F V Nom- U d o g 0 GG . d � N M c E ca Q rl 0 N I bJ C • U M ~ o ~ ° U ° C/I ctj U Q Q ¢ 'CS C'scd Q . y p a „O o 0 4°to o w N cd � ca '� � •� U a) � � c� o � � � � ~ • � •.,�~, � � SZ' U Q, cid � � 4� "a O • ^" M "O a) Ur b Q 0 o Q a) ° bl) "� U a) � 'CS "d M � � � • � s � a) . ° U 4-4 03 r Q O O� O U rn 3 j a) -d s� ` cq c� p O 4 a > .� a) " M -p ° 0 U a) O ' -0 o o r pct � ,� � O 'n 0 0 o ban � � a) .N � o • ~ bjD U cd a ° p 0 �• O U O p U 0 O U U y, L: P-0 c° cd s� a) C�3 cO U a3 O O woo F+ C'4 �a,-o wm ° w�� o M aap�LZ cd 4° cp ��" Q aj 0 3 0 o cj o° U o Cd 0 o o U O o o° 0 >'o �. Q ° w day- o o d � °w dQa dv Q..� U d�•3.� bJ C • U ov,q orA M ,� cn 4-4 En 03 to M cu 411 Ic 4-0 C,3 03 cl 41- Ln 4-4 U ., o .. C,3 -o Q. an 40.bh U '� o C7 enM 42 a� ° rl p •° a ° a) S"~- m � U o ct Q, sem". b p ��r �� N N U • � c�"j Cl. O , 9 3 a) oo 4-4U cd cC U bA ,= -- Cd cd G-� O U �+ L. O cl cz U� r. •� U U N U N �. "2 Cd +s- bA 4" O 4� o En 0 03 Is a, O �„ rA C3 co rn o czs .� cd 4� mcqj mai QUa �� 3 o ;3 03 03 � �' "ate. ° o E bn moo ° tj >~ o U on ocn Cl rA 06 oN x b cl oN NN a ° N u on M .� I m t o I 10 I m v a. cz bQ cd O b O cp O O 0 0 'O 0 0 0 O N Ocn ° 'bQQ Wt� � M C a, o. w oono N o�- Ucd cC i�, 0 vi t+ 0 o a 0� co m 4 0 30 U cu° -o ta jol 03 .r Cd OU Q) O O 0 a3 Cd (D 0 O .d En 0 p x U 40 is U � O U i" 0 n N a 0 ¢ ° '~ y c Z O N +� 0 c� 'd N p +`n+ �! N dN U d p C/� 4 v� cd .� 0 . cn N O bq Q O O U 'b Q, ¢ O — 0 4-, p bA - U 0 cd 0$, G", Q � cn �. . '� V b0 CJ r3 E} O 4o mco 10 c0 'D 0 i CS 3 0 Q O 44 0 O p GJ bA O s, «i .Oco U` 'd No �� .0 'O Cl) cc N �, O 'O °o QU �0 ` y ° 0 p -O o Cd o 0 o cz -"4 � �. a p ,- 40. V '� °' �° o Cd P, U o 00 O C 0 N' O O N ^C N 0 N N y °n E w W 0 -o W 0, CZ M CA 3 O O t~ U .0 0 U Q, U 0 9 y0 U U U 0 F-4 U u �I Z3 Q) hoo h I � N M C: E U ca I' bio v O O � o � U � ani z•' CL ¢+ � � u �I Z3 Q) hoo h I � N M C: E U ca I' v O O � TS bA ice, O u � p Sr W O Cl 4. a� p c� z � pp�r+ v� •� �' U O bA 3 6> bOA :b it 'v U a E v u �I Z3 Q) hoo h I � N M C: E U ca I' o n 3 O � Q W r 0 L 0 0 C `- ,° y •� w ° O_ .O.V 9 9 O � E c E 5�m3�� u��G •� v B N T C7 C O T � 2 N r •� w` h n ti E y O U o L H O F O a O N QQ C� p. - QI y w w w w www w w w w w w w w w w w w d y 7 n r O L �f�1+ G a o 0 ow o 0 � � w V o 0 0 o s N w O 46 O O H O K 0 C O O O O L o � � w °° t v 0 0 of a C C ` 1' V, p n e a a 7_ G � � c; _ E Q e �• E e > > cy c� U €a €z L 2 c � ti va ., J a a s N C T E •o o z 4r cnL G G E Q El: y� "a z r r C C 12/3/2019 Item 12.A.1. Board of County Commissioners December 31 2019 2019 Gifford Neighborhood Plan Implementation Report Card Background In May 2013 BCC directed staff to update the 2002 Gifford Neighborhood plan 2 12/3/2019 Item 12.A.1. Plan Update Process (2013-2014) - PCLG and Staff hosted 11 public meetings -Numerous County departments, staff, non - BCC offices, and agencies participated -Gifford residents and interested parties participated -Staff research, data collection, analysis -Re-Write of the 2002 Plan 3 BCC Approved the Gifford Neighborhood Plan 2014 On July 15, 2014 AOD- 2 12/3/2019 Item 12.A.1. Gifford. Neighborhood Flan "Gifford Forever" I Indian RiverCouni} Board of Counts Commissioners July 15, 2014 GNP Contains 15 Objectives and 82 Actions •Each objective •has specific action items •Each action item addresses who, what, when •Each action must be implemented by its due date 6 4W-3 12/3/2019 Item 12.A.1. Objective and Action Topics Include: • Communication • Housing • Economic Development • Streets, Sidewalks, Parks • 45th Street Beautification Project GNP -related projects now in adopted County CIE 2019 GNP Implementation Report Card *Implementation of the Plan started before July 15, 2014 approval 933 Actions had 2014-2019 due dates, 30 completed (91%), 3 are in progress (total 100%) •42 Ongoing Actions, all completed (100%) vim 12/3/2019 Item 12.A.1. Actions in Progress • "Action 7.3 — B�20�18, the County Public Works Department will repair, connect, and construct the sTi sidewalk a of ng45th Street from 43rd Avenue to U.S. #1 and by 2021 along 45th Street from 43rd Avenue to 58 venue, where necessary right -off way is available (has been acquired). The County will seek to install segments of a 45 Street sidewalk between 43rd Avenue and 58th Avenue prior to 2021." • "Action 7.4 — By 2024, the County Public Works Department will repair, connect, and construct as sidewalk along along 41st Street from 58th Avenue to U.S. #1, and a sidewalk along 49th Street from Fire Station 11 t�1, where necessary rig'�fway is available (has been acquired) and adequate fundinga�l,een obtained:' As reported at a 2017 PCLG meeting, and to the Board that same year, sidewalk in vicinity of the railroad is not possible at this time due to timing of All Aboard Florida/Brightline (Virgin Trains) proposed improvements that preclude sidewalk construction at this time. Public Works continues to pursue the three intersection improvement of 41st 45th 49th Street and Old Dixie and US #1. • County recently met with Virgin Trains regarding the railroad crossing and the design proposed by Virgin Trains. • County provided plans to Virgin Trains Engineering Team and they are evaluating the plans for incorporation into the Virgin Trains Crossing Plans. Actions in Progress With respect to Action 7.3, the 45th Street sidewalk between 43rd Avenue and 58th Avenue was awarded February 6, 2018. This item may be completed ahead of the 2021 date. G� 12/3/2019 Item 12.A.1. Actions In Progress 'Action 11.8 — By 2018, the County's Public Works Department will coordinate with the Indian River. Farms Water Control District (IRFWCD), identify any appropriate safety barriers along canals in Gifford that are warranted by accident data and that the District will allow, and report its findings to the Board of County Commissioners and the Progressive Civic League of Gifford. This item is in progress. Completion date should be changed to 2020 due to staff workload. Actions in Progress • "Action 10.2 — By 2019, the County will signalize and/or improve the 58th Avenue/45th Street and 58th Avenue 49th Street intersections, if adequate right-of-way has been obtained. The Progressive Civic League of Gifford will assist the County during the right-of-way acquisition process." Completion date for this project should be changed to 2020 as the project will be completed by a developer in that year. M 12/3/2019 Item 12.A.1. Coordination with the PCLG Per Action 1.5 of the plan the draft "report card" was provided to the Progressive Civic League of Gifford (PCLG) Recommendation BCC review and accept the GNP 2019 implementation report card M 12/3/2019 Item 12.A.1. Gifford Neighborhood Plan 2014 information on county website: www.ircgov.com http://www.irccdd.com/Gifford/index.h tml 15 12 'suirewsaper PARTOF ;THE't75A"TODAY;NETWORK Indian River Press Journal 1801 U.S. 1, Vero Beach, FL 32960 AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION INDIAN RIVER COUNTY PLANNING 1801 27 TH STREET VERO BEACH, FL 32960. STATE OF WISCONSIN COUNTY OF BROWN Before the undersigned authority personally appeared, said legal clerk, who on oath says that he/she is a legal clerk of the Indian River Press Journal, a daily newspaper published at Vero Beachin Indian River Press Journal, a daily newspaper published at Vero Beach in Indian River County, Florida: that the attached copy of advertisement was published in the Indian River Press Journal in the following issues below. Affiant further says that the said Indian River Press Journal is a newspaper published in Vero Beach in said Indian River County, Florida, and that said newspaper has heretofore been continuously published in said Indian River County, Florida, daily and distributed in Indian River County, Florida, for a period of one year next preceding the first publication of the attached copy of advertisement; and affiant further says that she has neither paid or promised any person, firm or corporation any discount, rebate, commission or refund for the purpose of securing this advertisement for publication in the said newspaper. The Indian River Press Journal has been entered as Periodical Matter at the Post Offices in Vero Beach, Indian River County, Florida and has been for a period of one year next preceding the first publication of the attached copy of advertisement. November 17, 2019 Subscribed and sworn to before on November 17, 20191. a.L'o—yY� uY" cQ.lr- §— Notarv. State of WI. Countv of Brown TARA MONDLOCH Notary Public State of Wisconsin My commission expires August 6, 2021 Publication Cost: $153.90 Ad No: 0003889724 Customer No: 1310785 PO #: This is not an invoice q i BEFORE THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER ADOPTING AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE COUNTY'S COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT NOTICE IS HEREBYGIVEN that the, Board of County Commis - of Indian River County, Ftoriifa;,, shall hold a public hearing to ,cdinaider the adop- tion of, a cquAty ,ordinance amending; 06-' next. of "the, comprehensive;. -plan, .:at .!its iegulai__;iiWoog ;.pon Tuesday; Dec@ ntier,3; 2'019 at 9:00,a:m or as soon thereafter . as the matter may be heard, in the County Commission �Charitbers of County Adminfstiaiion. Building A,,.,focated at 1801 27th Street, .;Vero, Beach, Flori- da: Ntatters affecting `your poisonat :and rproperty', .rights' may iia rd 'and :acted upon., hit.,. _interested perons ate invtfeii ' to atlerid 'andstie heard.' The title of the proposed ordi- nance is as follows: AN ORDINANCE OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA AMENDING THE TEXT OF THE COMPREHENSIVEPLAN'SCAP- ITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELE MENT; AND PROVIDING SEVERABILITYAND EFFECTIV DATE. The plan amendment applica- tion may be inspected by the public at the Gdfnfnunity06- velopment DepatlnieYi!_ locai_t ed m County. A'd I I , 9tratidri Building A .located at 1801 27th Street, , ero Beach, Flori- da, between the hours of 8:30 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. on week- days. For more information, contact the Long Range Plan- ning Section at (772) 226- 1241.. Amendments to _ the propos¢d ordinance, 'may. !.be, ,made by the.; loai`d, of ,Cd' .4y, ;Comm(ssioners at the pu!{ is hearing. ANYONE WHO MAY WISH TO APPEAL ANY DECISION WHICH MAY BE MADE AT THIS MEETING WILL NEED TO ENSURE THAT A VERBATIM RECORD OF THE PROCEED INGS IS MADE, WHICH IN- CLUDESTHE TESTIMONY AND EVIDENCE UPON WHICH THE APPEAL IS BASED, ANYONE WHO NEEDSA SPE CIAL ACCOMMODATION FOF THIS MEETING MUST CON- TACT THE COUNTY'S AMERI- CANS WITH DISABILITIESACT COORDINATOR AT (772) 226- 1223 AT LEAST 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE OF THE MEETING. INDIAN RIVER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS By: -s- Bob Solari, Chairman Pub: November 17, 2019 TCN 3889724 0 eUV -1 �2C,7. 1. Departmental Item Indian River County, Florida Department of Utility Services Board Memorandum Date: November 6, 2019 To: Jason E. Brown, County Administrator From: Vincent Burke, PE, Director of Utility Services Cindy Corrente, Utility Finance Manager Through: Jennifer Hyde, Purchasing Manager Prepared By: Terry Southard, Operations Manager, Utility Services Rich Meckes, Wastewater Superintendent Subject: Synagro Dewatering and Sewage Sludge Removal Contract Renewal and Price Increase Background/Analysis: The purpose of this agenda is three -fold. First, it is to seek the Indian River County Board of County Commissioners (BCC) approval for the second 12 -month extension with Synagro, in accordance with Bid Number 2016018. Second, it is to seek BCC approval for a Synagro-requested rate increase, effective January 2020. Third, staff recommends the BCC authorize the Purchasing Manager to process a change order on Purchase Order 84540 to Synagro for hauling to increase it by $11,000. This is to cover the difference between the current encumbered amount of $420,000 and the projected amount of $430,570.01 (rounded up to $431,000). On March 1, 2016, the BCC approved the award for Bid Number 2016018 to Synagro for the operations of the Residual Dewatering Facility and sewage sludge removal. Indian River County Department of Utility Services (IRCDUS) has contracted with Synagro for residual dewatering and sewage sludge removal since 2005. Article 7 of the agreement states that the contract period is binding for three consecutive years from the date of the agreement with an additional two 12 -month terms. The first 12 -month extension expires February 29, 2020. The second extension would expire on February 28, 2021. The terms of the contract allows for modification of pricing upon mutual agreement of both parties. In a letter dated October 30, 2019, Synagro requested a price adjustment of 1.33%, effective January 2020. The new rates are reflected in the table below. F:\UtilitieALITILITY - EMPLOYEE FOLDERS\Richard Meckes\Sludge and Plant\Agenda-Synagro Renewal 2020 Q.doc Page4 f� Actual Cost Projected Projected Projected Service Current Recommended MarSept. Cost Cost Annual Price Price 2019-Sept. 0019 Oct. -Dec. Jan. - Sept. Total 2019 2020 Sludge Hauling $0.0279 $0.0283 $241,872.43 $103,659.61 $326,910.40 $430,570.01 Per gallon Sludge Dewatering $208.08 $210.85 $199,119.09 $85,336.75$250,301.30 $335,638.05 Perton F:\UtilitieALITILITY - EMPLOYEE FOLDERS\Richard Meckes\Sludge and Plant\Agenda-Synagro Renewal 2020 Q.doc Page4 f� Funding: Funds for this project are derived from the Utilities operating fund. Utilities operating funds are generated from water and sewer sales. Funds have been encumbered to cover the projected annual totals. Description Account Number Total Amount 218 Sewage Sludge Removal 47121836-044730 $430,570.01 257 Other Professional Services 47125736-033190 $335,638.05 Recommendation: The staff of Indian River County Department of Utility Services recommends that the Board of County Commissioners (BCC) approve the renewal of the contract with Synagro for the second 12 -month term, approve the 1.33% price increase effective January 1, 2020, and authorize the Chairman to execute the sample extension after approval by the County Attorney as to form and legal sufficiency. Staff also recommends the BCC authorize the Purchasing Manager to process a change order on Purchase Order 84540 to Synagro in regard to hauling for an increase of $11,000 in order to cover the difference between the current encumbered amount of $420,000 and the projected amount of $430,570.01 (rounded up to $431,000). Attachment: Sample Extension F:\Utilities\UTILITY - EMPLOYEE FOLDERS\Richard Meckes\Sludge And Plant\Agenda-Synagro Renewal 2020 V2.Doc 402 SECOND EXTENSION AND AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT FOR OPERATIONS OF THE BIOSOLIDS DEWATERING FACILITY, SLUDGE DEWATERING AND HAULING This Second Extension and Amendment (Second Extension) to that certain Agreement to provide Operations of the Biosolids Dewatering Facility, Sludge Dewatering and Hauling services is entered into effective as of January 1, 2020 by and between Indian River County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida ("County") and Synagro South, LLC ("Contractor"). BACKGROUND RECITALS WHEREAS, the County and the Contractor entered into an Agreement for Operations of the Biosolids Dewatering Facility, Sludge Dewatering and Hauling Services effective March 1, 2016; and WHEREAS, Paragraph 7 of the Agreement contains the term and renewal provisions; and WHEREAS,, the first term commenced effective as of March 1, 2016 and ended on February 28, 2019; and WHEREAS, the first extension commenced effective as of March 1, 2019 and will terminate on February 29, 2020; and WHEREAS, Paragraph 4 of the Agreement authorizes Contractorto request modification to pricing annually; and WHEREAS, pursuant to the Agreement, the parties desire to extend the Agreement for an additional one year period and add certain provisions to the Agreement; and NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing, and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the County and the Contractor agree as follows: 1. The background recitals are true and correct and form a material part of this First Extension. 2. The second renewal term shall commence effective March 1, 2020 and shall end on February 28, 2021; no additional renewals are available. 3. Contractor has requested and County has agreed to a 1.33% increase in pricing from $0.0279 to $0.0283 per gallon for hauling and from $208.08 to $210.86 per ton for dewatering, beginning on January 1, 2020. 3. All other terms and provisions of the Agreement shall be unchanged and remain in full force and effect. 403 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Second Extension to be executed effective the day and year first set forth above. OWNER: INDIAN RIVER COUNTY By: Chairman LIM Jason E. Brown, County Administrator APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGAL SUFFICIENCY: CONTRACTOR: 0 Attest (Contractor) (CORPORATE SEAL) By: Dylan Reingold, County Attorney Address forgiving notices: Jeffrey R. Smith, Clerk of Court and Comptroller Attest: Deputy Clerk (SEAL) Designated Representative: Name: Richard Meckes ' Title: Wastewater Superintendent Utilities Operations 4350 41 st Street Vero Beach, FL 32967 (772) 226-3400 Facsimile: (772) 226-3419 License No. (Where applicable) Agent for service of process: Designated Representative: Name: Title: Address: Phone: Facsimile: (If CONTRACTOR is a corporation or a partnership, attach evidence of authority to sign.) 404 I.E. i, December 3, 2019 Item No. 141 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS INTER -OFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: Members of the Board of County Commissioners DATE: November 26, 2019 SUBJECT: Citizens Against The Train (CATT) Video FROM: Bob Solari Commissioner, District 5 CATT has produced a series of videos as it continues to get Virgin Trains to do the right thing. I would like to show the first video and then see if the Board will allow the video and future videos to be put on the County T. V. and website. Thank you, :•. 405 14.E-2., December 3, 2019 Item 14.E. INDIAN RIVER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS INTER -OFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: Members of the Board of County Commissioners DATE: November 26, 2019 SUBJECT: Gifford Gardens and the Affordable Housing Committee FROM: Bob Solari Commissioner, District 5 Would like to discuss with the Board the possible tasking of the Affordable Housing Committee with using the former Gifford Gardens property as a template project for affordable housing and discuss having the County Attorney bring a foreclosure project against the owner of the Gifford Gardens property. Thank you. :.. 406 t5.A.2, DISTRICT INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA MEMORANDUM TO: Honorable Emergency Services District Board of Commissioners THROUGH: Jason E. Brown, County Administrator THROUGH: Tad Stone, Director Department of Emergency Services FROM: Stephen R. Greer, Captain Fire Rescue Division DATE: November 20, 2019 SUBJECT: Approval of FY 2019/2020 EMS County Awards Grant: Purchase of Capital/Operating Equipment Using Non -Matching EMS Grant Funds and Grant Resolution It is respectfully requested that the information contained herein be given formal consideration by the Emergency Services District Board of Commissioners at the next regular scheduled meeting. DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS: The Department of Health, Bureau of Emergency Medical Services (EMS), is authorized by Chapter 401, Part II, Florida Statutes, to distribute county grant funds. The funds are then made available to eligible county governments to improve and expand their prehospital emergency medical services. The grant program is an innovative process, which enables EMS agencies to enhance EMS systems through the Board of County Commissioners. It should be noted that the conditions of the grant require the County to ensure that the EMS grant funds will not be used to supplant or replace any existing EMS budget allocations and the resolution must include a statement, to that effect. The grant conditions also require a separate accounting of the EMS funds from all other funds. Historically, the County Awards Grant has been used to purchase medical related equipment or equipment that will assist in the delivery of the service. ALTERNATIVES AND ANALYSIS: The county grant funds are derived from surcharges on various traffic violations. Funding in the amount of $16,456.00 has been allocated to Indian River County for FY 2019/2020. The grant funds will be utilized as indicated in the grant application for equipment and 407 services to improve and expand the Advanced/Basic Life Support EMS prehospital system. The equipment proposed and justification for purchase in the expenditure plan is as follows: Stryker Lucas 3.1 Mechanical CPR Device The Lucas 3.1 by Stryker is a state of the art Mechanical CPR Device which will aid us in performing continuous chest compressions as recommended in the 2015 AHA CPR Guidelines. FUNDING: No local funds are utilized in the execution of this grant. These grant dollars are from allocated monies through surcharges on certain traffic violations. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the FY 2019/2020 EMS Grant and resolution to purchase the equipment as noted in the attachments. Staff further recommends that the Board of County Commissioners authorize the Chairman to execute the necessary documents to obtain funds from the Department of Health in the amount of $16,456.00 and authorize budget amendments, as required, to receive and expend the grant funds. In order to comply with the requirements of this Grant, staff is also seeking authorization for the establishment of a unique accounting code designator for all County Awards Grant deposits, disbursements, interests accrual and rollover of funds, as they are required to be maintained in a separate fund or account for inspection by the State EMS Monitoring and Compliance Unit. ATTACHMENTS: 1. County Grant Form 2. EMS County Awards Grant Application 3. EMS County Awards Grant Resolution 408 GRANT NAME: EMS County Awards Grant GRANT #. Description AMOUNT OF GRANT: $ 16.456.00 Position DEPARTMENT RECEIVING GRANT: Emergency Services Fire Rescue Position CONTACT PERSON: Steve Greer PHONE NUMBER: 772-226-3864 Regular Salaries 1. How long is the grant for? 1 year Starting Date: TBD N/A 2. Does the grant require you to fund this function after the grant is over? Yes X No 3. Does the grant require a match? Yes X No If yes, does the grant allow the match to be In Kind Services? Yes No 4. Percentage of match N/A 0% N/A 5. Grant match amount required $ N/A N/A 6. Where are the matching funds coming from (i.e. In Kind Services; Reserve for Contingency)? N/A Social Security 7. Does the grant cover capital costs or start-up costs? Yes No If no, how much do you think will be needed in capital costs or start up costs $ (Attach a detail listing of costs) $ 012.12 8. Are you adding any additional positions utilizin the grant funds? Yes X No If yes, please list. (If additional space is needed, please attach a schedule.) Acct. Description Position Position Position Position Position 011.12 Regular Salaries N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 011.13 Other Salaries & Wages (PT) N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 012.11 Social Security N/A $ Fifth Year $ $ 012.12 Retirement -Contributions 012.13 Insurance -Life & Health 012.14 Worker=s Compensation 012.17 S/Sec. Medicare Matching TOTAL 9. What is the total cost of each position including benefits, capital, start-up, auto expense, travel and operating? Salary and Benefits Operating Costs Capital Total Costs N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 10. What is the estimated cost of the grant to the county over five years? Signature of Preparer: Date: 409 Grant Amount Other Match Costs Not Covered Match Total First Year $ $ $ $ Second Year $ $ $ $ Third Year $ $ $ $ Fourth Year $ $ $ $ Fifth Year $ $ $ $ Signature of Preparer: Date: 409 Instructions: County Government Application Form 2019-2020 The amount of your new grant is in the "Total" column of the county amount table at the state EMS website link. The first application form page has five numbered items. The first three are self-explanatory. However, note that Item 2 on the first application page is where the county's authorized person must provide his/her signature and date. Item 4 describes the content of the "resolution." Please provide this in your county's customary format and approval process. The resolution must be current; or if a previous resolution has continuing authority, include a message from a lead county official stating that the resolution is still in -effect, with a copy of it. Item 5 of the first page of the application form asks for the name of the organization(s) to which you decide to allocate funds from your new county grant. The second page of the application form is the budget page, and one of these budget pages is needed for each organization listed in item 5, The budget page for each organization must have on it specific and quantifiable items or services, with the cost for each unit or type of item or service. All costs combined must total to the exact amount of new funds for your grant. You can request budget changes after the new grant begins. Your budget totals in the application should be added for you if you place your cursor over a subtotal or total field, Light click your mouse, then left click "Update Field." You should copy this form on your computer to use it. If you place the application in restricted editing mode, you can use your keyboard Tab key to go from field to field. Request for Grant Fund Distribution Form Request for Grant Fund Distribution Form: this is the last page herein and you must complete the top part of the form. State EMS will complete the bottom part, as indicated on the form. The address on this form must be an address in the state MyFloridaMarketplace (MFMP) system. A mailing address you place on this form is not usable by state finance if it is not in the MFMP system. Ask a staff member of your organization who does cash transactions with the state for the organization name to use on the Distribution Form, the address, and its corresponding 9 -digit federal tax ID plus its 3 -digit sequence code. Otherwise, no funds can be sent to you until this situation is resolved. If needed, you can contact MFMP customer service at 1-866-352-3776 Monday to Friday, 8 a.m. to 6 p.m., or by email at: MvFloridaMarketPlace(a�dms.Myflorida.com. 410 EMS COUNTY GRANT APPLICATION FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH Emergency Medical Services Program Complete all items ID. Code The State EMS Program will assign the ID Code — leave this blank C80 1. Count Name: Indian River Count Business Address: 1800 27'h Street Vero Beach, FL 32960 Telephone: 772 223-3900 Federal Tax ID Number Nine Digit Number): VF 59-60006764 2. Certification: (The applicant signatory who has authority to sign contracts, grants, and other legal documents for the county) I certify that all information and data in this EMS county grant application and its attachments are true and correct. My signature acknowledges and assures that the county shall comply fully with the conditions outlined in the Florida EMS County Grant Application. Signature: Date: Printed Name: Susan Adams Position Title: Chairman, Board of County Commissioners 3. Contact Person: (The individual with direct knowledge of the project on a day-to-day basis and has responsibility for the implementation of the grant activities. This person is authorized to sign project reports and may request project changes. The signer and the contact person may be the same.) Name: Stephen R. Greer Position Title: Captain Address: 4225 43rd Ave Vero Beach, FL 32967 Telephone: 772-226-3864 Fax Number: 772-978-1820 E-mail Address: sgreer@ircgov.com 4. Resolution: Attach a resolution from the Board of County Commissioners certifying the grant funds will improve and expand the county pre -hospital EMS system and will not be used to supplant current levels of county expenditures. We cannot process for funds without this resolution. 5. Organization List: Complete a budget page(s) for each organization, which at your option you will provide funds. List the organization(s) below. (Use additional pages if necessary) DH 1684, December 2008 (Rev. July 2018) 64J-1.015, F.A.C. 411 BUDGET PAGE A. Salaries and Benefits: For each position title, provide the amount of salary per hour, FICA per hour, other fringe benefits, and the total number of hours. Amount TOTAL Salaries = $ 0.00 TOTAL FICA & Other Benefits = Total Salaries & Benefits = $ 0.00 B. Expenses: These are travel costs and the usual, ordinary, and incidental expenditures by an agency, such as, commodities and supplies of a consumable nature excluding expenditures classified as operaung ca itai outtay ksee next category). List the item and, if applicable, the quantity Amount I Total Expenses = I $ 0.00 1 C. Vehicles, equipment, and other operating capital outlay means equipment, fixtures, and other tangible personal property of a non -consumable and non -expendable nature with a normal expected life OT one year or more. List the item and, if applicable, the quantity Amount Lucas 3.1 Mechanical CPR Device 1 16,456.00 1 UH 1684, Uecember 2UU8 Total Vehicles & Equipment = I $ 16,456.00 I 2 Grand Total = 412 FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES (EMS) GRANT UNIT REQUEST FOR GRANT FUND DISTRIBUTION In accordance with the provisions of section 401.113(2) (a), Florida Statutes, the undersigned hereby requests an EMS grant fund distribution for the improvement and expansion of pre -hospital EMS. DOH Remit Payment To: The agency name, address, and federal ID number must be in the state MyFloridaMarketPlace (MFMP) system. Ask a finance person in your organization who does business with the state to provide these. Name of Agency: Indian River County Board of County Commissioners Mailing Address: 1800 27th Street Vero Beach, FL 32960 Federal 9 -digit Identification number: VF 59-60006764 3 -digit seq. code 070 Authorized County Official: Signature Date Susan Adams, Chairman Type or Print Name and Title Sign and return this page with your application to: Florida Department of Health Emergency Medical Services Unit, Grants 4052 Bald Cypress Way, Bin A-22 Tallahassee, Florida 32399-1722 Do not write below this line. For use by State Emergency Medical Services Section Grant Amount for State to Pay: $ Approved. By: Approved By: Signature of State EMS Unit Supervisor Signature of Contract Manager State Fiscal Year: 2019 - 2020 Organization Code E.O. 64-61-70-30-000 05 Federal Tax ID: YF Grant Beginning Date: Grant ID: Code: C80 OCA Object Code SF005 751000 Seq. Code: Grant Ending Date: Date Date Category 059998 DH 1767P, December 2008 (rev. June 8, 2018), incorporated by reference in F.A.C. 64J-1.015 3 413 RESOLUTION NO. 2019- A RESOLUTION OF THE EMERGENCY SERVICES DISTRICT BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS, INDIAN RIVER COUTY, FLORIDA, AUTHORIZING THE APPLICATION FOR FUNDING COUNTY EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES (EMS) GRANT AWARDS TO BE SUBMITTED TO THE STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, BUREAU OF EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES. WHEREAS, The Florida Department of Health, Bureau of Emergency Medical Services announced that applications for funding County Emergency Medical Services (EMS) Grant awards are now being accepted and a grant application has been prepared for Indian River County; and WHEREAS, an application for grant funds for fiscal year 2019/2020 has been prepared by the County; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE EMERGENCY SERVICES DISTRICT BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that the Chairman is authorized to sign and execute the application for EMS grant funds certifying that monies from the EMS Grant Program For Counties will improve and expand the County's pre -hospital EMS system and that the funds will not be used to supplant existing County EMS budget allocations. The foregoing Resolution was offered by Commissioner who moved its adoption. The motion was seconded by Commissioner and, upon being put to a vote, the vote was as follows: Chairman Susan Adams Vice -Chairman Joseph E. Flescher Commissioner Peter D. O'Bryan Commissioner Tim Zorc Commissioner Bob Solari The Chairperson thereupon declared the resolution duly passed and adopted this third day of December 2019. ATTEST: Jeffrey R. Smith, Clerk of Court and Comptroller Approved as to form and legal sufficiency: M William K. DeBraal Deputy County Attorney EMERGENCY SEVICES DISTRICT BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA ff-W Susan Adams, Chairman 414