The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About04/20/2021 (4)4 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS INDIAN RIVER COUNTY FLORIDA COMMISSION AGENDA TUESDAY, APRIL 20,2021 - 9:00 AM Commission Chambers Indian River County Administration Complex 180127th Street, Building A Vero Beach, Florida, 32960-3388 www.ircgov.com COUNTYCOMMISSIONERS ' Chairman, Joseph E. Flescher, District 2 Jason E. Brown, County Administrator Vice Chairman, Peter D. O'Bryan, District 4 Dylan Reingold, County Attorney Commissioner Susan Adams, District 1 Jeffrey R. Smith, Clerk of the Circuit Court and Comptroller Commissioner Joseph H. Earman, District 3 Commissioner Laura Moss, District 5 This meeting can be attended virtually via Zoom. Instructions can be found at the end of this agenda and also online at www.ircgov.com. 1. CALL TO ORDER 2.A. A MOMENT OF SILENT REFLECTION FOR FIRST RESPONDERS AND MEMBERS OF THE ARMED FORCES 2.B. INVOCATION Pastor Nicole Eastwood, Our Savior Lutheran Church 3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Commissioner Peter D. O'Bryan, Vice Chairman 4. ADDITIONS/DELETIONS TO THE AGENDA / EMERGENCY ITEMS 5. PROCLAMATIONS and PRESENTATIONS 5.A. Presentation of Proclamation Designating the Jackie Robinson Training Complex as the Official Training Facility of the USA Softball National Teams Attachments: JRTC Proclamation 5.B, Presentation of Proclamation Honoring Teddy Floyd on His Retirement from the Indian River County Sheriffs Office Attachments: Proclamation April 20, 2021 Page 1 of 7 5.C. Presentation of Proclamation Designating April 18 Through April 25, 2021 as Crime Victims' Rights Week Attachments: Proclamation 5.D. Presentation of Proclamation Designating the Week of April 18 Through 24, 2021 As National Volunteer Appreciation Week Attachments: Proclamation 6. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 6.A. Regular Meeting of February 9, 2021 6.B. Regular Meeting of February 16, 2021 7. INFORMATION ITEMS FROM STAFF OR COMMISSIONERS NOT REQUIRING BOARD ACTION 7.A. 2nd Quarter FY 2020/2021 Budget Report Attachments: Staff Report 2nd Quarter Budget Report 8. CONSENT AGENDA 8.A. Rejection of Bids for 2021010 - JRTC Ticket Office Building Renovations (IRC -2020) Attachments: Staff Report 8.B. Request to Approve the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Third Set of Housing Rehabilitation Bids (3 Bids) for the County's Housing Rehabilitation CDBG Attachments: Staff Report Bid Tabulation Part 2 Section H(3) of the IRC HAP 8.C. Amendment No. 1 to Work Order No. 1, Atkins North America, Inc.6th Avenue Milling & Resurfacing from US I to 21st Street IRC -1638 Attachments: Staff Report Amendment No. 1 to Work Order No. 1 EXHIBIT A 8.D. Approval of FWC Grant for Indian River County Derelict Vessel Removal Project Attachments: Staff Report FWC Grant Agreement No. 20318 FWC 20318 GrantForm IRC DV Removal Maps April 20, 2021 Page 2 of 7 8.E. Approval of Work Order No. AACE-1 With Andersen Andre Consulting Engineers, Inc. for Construction Testing Services for Moorhen Marsh Low Energy Aquatic Plant System Attachments: Staff Report Work Order AACE-1 Exhibit A - Andersen Andre 8.F. Modification #1 to Subgrant Agreement (EMPA) between the Florida Division of Emergency Management and Indian River County Agreement Number A0090 Attachments: Staff Report EMPA Agreement -Modification 1 8.G. Request to Waive Bid Process for Caustic Soda Chemicals Attachments: Staff Report 8.H. South County Reverse Osmosis Water Treatment Plant Part A Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition System Upgrades, Kimley-Horn and Associates Work Order 4 Attachments: Staff Report Work Order No 4 with KHA dated March 2021 8.I. Change Order to Boromei Construction, Inc., for Data Flow System antenna and Tower Replacement Attachments: Staff Report Change Order to Proposal 8.J. 16th Street Ballfields Release of Right of Entry and Reservation of Mineral Rights Attachments: Staff Report Release 8.K. Fiscal Year 2020 JAGC Allocations Attachments: Staff Report FY20 JAGC Allocations FY20 COP Certificate Of Participation 9. CONSTITUTIONAL OFFICERS and GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES 10. PUBLIC ITEMS A. PUBLIC HEARINGS April 20, 2021 Page 3 of 7 10.A.1. Public Hearing Regarding Florida Power & Light Company's Request for Major Site Plan and Special Exception Use Approval for a Private Heavy Utility (FPL Grove Solar Energy Center) [SP -SE -21-02-04 / 2020090097-88553] (QUASI-JUDICIAL) Attachments: Staff Report Location Map Extended Roadway Grid Network Exhibit Aerial Site Plan 10.A.2. Public Hearing Regarding Sunnyside Up 1, LLC's Request to Rezone +/-40.25 Acres From PDTND to RM -8 (RZON-2008050077-88741) - QUASI-JUDICIAL Attachments: Staff Report Summary Page Rezoning Application Draft Minutes 3/11/2021 PZC Ordinance No.2003-001 Ordinance No.2009-020 Ordinance No.2011-010 Section 911.08(4) Table of Uses Section 902.12(3) Standards of Review Ordinance 10.A.3. Public Hearing Regarding North Sebastian Water and Sewer Project Phase 2 (Legislative) Attachments: Staff Report Assessment Area Map Water Assessment Area Map Sewer Resolution III with Water Assessment Roll - Exhibit A DRAFT Temporary Construction Easement Resolution to accept Utility Easement at Ruffner Lane B. PUBLIC DISCUSSION ITEMS C. PUBLIC NOTICE ITEMS 11. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR MATTERS 12. DEPARTMENTAL MATTERS A. Community Development B. Emergency Services April 20, 2021 Page 4 of 7 C. General Services D. Human Resources E. Information Technology 12.E.1. County Websites, Domains, and Internet -Based Services Attachments: Staff Report Attachment 1 - County Websites Attachment 2 - New Domain Attachment 3 - Web Services F. Office of Management and Budget 12.F.1. Property/Casualty Insurance 2021-22 Attachments: Staff Report AJG Executive Summary G. Public Works 12.G.1. Presentation of the Indian River County Beach Preservation Plan (2019 Update) Attachments: Staff Report Executive Summary 2019 BPP Update Beach and Shores Committee Letter of Support H. Utilities Services 12.11.1. North Sebastian Water and Sewer Project Phase 2, Award of Bid No. 2021019 Attachments: Staff Report Construction Contract Recommendation of Award 13. COUNTY ATTORNEY MATTERS 13.A. Interlocal Agreement with City of Fellsmere for Contractor Licensing Attachments: Staff Report ILA - Contractor License (RL) 13.B. Approval of Developer's Agreement with Ryall Development Group, LLC for Liberty Park Subdivision Attachments: Staff Report Developer's Agreement 14. COMMISSIONERS MATTERS A. Commissioner Joseph E. Flescher, Chairman B. Commissioner Peter D. O'Bryan, Vice Chairman April 20, 2021 Page 5 of 7 C. Commissioner Susan Adams D. Commissioner Joseph H. Earman E. Commissioner Laura Moss 14.E.1. Geohydrology - Updated Survey Attachments: Commissioner's Memorandum IRC 2030 Comp Plan Chapter 3D Geohydrology Suvey & Report (1988) 15. SPECIAL DISTRICTS AND BOARDS A. Emergency Services District 15.A.1. Approval of Meeting Minutes February 02, 2021 15.A.2. Approval of Minutes Meeting of February 9, 2021 15.A.3. Sole Source Purchase of Eleven (11) Stryker CR2 AED Defibrillators Attachments: Staff Report STRYKER QUOTE 10268905 15.A.4. Sole Source Purchase of Eight (8) Stryker Lifepak 15 v4 Cardiac Monitors Attachments: Staff Report Stryker Lifepak Quote B. Solid Waste Disposal District 15.11.1. Approval of Minutes Meeting of February 9, 2021 15.B.2. Approval of Minutes Meeting of February 16, 2021 15.B.3. Final Pay to Geosyntec for Work Order No. 6 - Permit Compliance Monitoring and Reporting - Indian River County Landfill Attachments: Staff Report Geosyntec Project Completion Report 15.B.4. Request to Expand SWDD Recycling Education Services Attachments: Staff Report SWDD Recycling Activities C. Environmental Control Board 16. ADJOURNMENT April 20, 2021 Page 6 of 7 Except for those matters specifically exempted under the State Statute and Local Ordinance, the Board shall provide an opportunity for public comment prior to the undertaking by the Board of any action on the agenda, including those matters on the Consent Agenda. Public comment shall also be heard on any proposition which the Board is to take action which was either not on the Board agenda or distributed to the public prior to the commencement of the meeting. Anyone who may wish to appeal any decision which may be made at this meeting will need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made which includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal will be based. Anyone who needs a special accommodation for this meeting may contact the County's Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Coordinator at (772) 226-1223 at least 48 hours in advance of meeting. Anyone who needs special accommodation with a hearing aid for this meeting may contact the Board of County Commission Office at 772-226-1490 at least 20 hours in advance of the meeting. The full agenda is available on line at the Indian River County Website at www.ircgov.com The full agenda is also available for review in the Board of County Commission Office, the Indian River County Main Library, and the North County Library. Commission Meetings are broadcast live on Comcast Cable Channel 27 Rebroadcasts continuously with the following proposed schedule: Tuesday at 6:00 p.m. until Wednesday at 6:00 a.m., Wednesday at 9:00 a.m. until 5:00 p.m., Thursday at 1:00 p.m. through Friday Morning, and Saturday at 12: 00 Noon to 5:00 p.m. April 20, 2021 Page 7 of 7 5, A, PROCLAMATION DESIGNATING THE JACKIE ROBINSON TRAINING COMPLEX AS THE OFFICIAL TRAINING FACILITY OF THE USA SOFTBALL NATIONAL TEAMS WHEREAS, effective January 2, 2019 Major League Baseball assumed operation of the Jackie Robinson Training Complex in Vero Beach; and WHEREAS, Major League Baseball's mission is to utilize the Jackie Robinson Training Complex to serve as a hub for the growth and development of the games of baseball and softball, and to continue Jackie Robinson's legacy of developing diverse young people both on and off the field ; and WHEREAS, it was announced on January' 23, 2020 that Major League Baseball was to enhance its partnership with USA Softball by becoming the presenting sponsor of the United States Women's National Softball Team's "Stand Beside Her" Tour in preparation for the 2020 Summer Olympics; and WHEREAS, April 12, 2021 marked the start of the United States Women's National Softball Team's first training camp hosted by the Jackie Robinson Training Complex; and I WHEREAS, an open practice session was held at the Jackie Robinson Training Complex on April 16, 2021 providing the local Indian River County community with the opportunity to experience a US Women's National Softball Team practice in'person; and WHEREAS, in July of 2021 the Women's National Softball Team will represent the United States in the 2020 Olympics in Tokyo, Japan. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT PROCLAIMED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA that the Board designates the Jackie Robinson Training Complex as the Official Training Facility of the USA Softball National Teams, and hereby congratulates Major League Baseball on its efforts and success in Indian River County. Adopted this 20th day of April, 2021. , BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA wim- ma 9 :r.%Mr a1.� PROCLAMATION HONORING TEDDY FLOYD ON HIS RETIREMENT FROM THE INDIAN RIVER COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE WHEREAS, Theodore "Teddy" Floyd, after beginning his journey in law enforcement in 1991 and serving with great distinction for thirty years, is retiring from they Sheriffs Office, effective April 30, 2021; and I WHEREAS, Teddy was employed in several different capacities over his lengthy career, including corrections and law enforcement, but spent the majority of his calling serving the citizens in a community policing function; and i WHEREAS, Teddy was a Charter Member of the Community Oriented Policing Enforcement (COPE) Unit in Indian River County in 1994 — affirming that "There is no hope without COPE" — and was among the first deputies assigned to the then newly -formed Crime Prevention Unit in 2002; and WHEREAS, Teddy was bestowed with many commendations and honors, including Law Enforcement Employee of the Year for 1994, the Governor's Point of Light Award in 2009, TC Palm's 2006 "Inspirational Community Leader" recognition, the Exchange Club's Deputy of the Quarter Award in 2007, and entry into the 2006 Federal Congressional Record by Representative Kendrick Meek; and WHEREAS, Teddy has been an active member of many community-based organizations, including the Progressive Civic League, our local NAACP, Habitat for.Humanity, the Treasure Coast Business League, and the Gifford Youth Achievement Center, among many others; and WHEREAS, Teddy worked with extraordinary dedication and diligence to protect and serve the citizens of Indian River County and the State of Florida, earning'the appreciation of five Indian River County Sheriffs and all those who've had the honor of working with him. j NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT PROCLAIMED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that the Board lauds the contributions Teddy Floyd has made to the citizens of Indian River County during his highly -successful law enforcement career, extols his mantra that one should "never look down on a man unless you're picking him up," and wishes him a happy and prosperous retirement. Adopted this 20th day of April, 2021. ; BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, i INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA i Joseph E. Flescher, Chairman Peter D. O'Bryan, Vice Chairman I Susan Adams i Joseph H. Earman Laura Moss 2 5 .Cd PROCLAMATION DESIGNATING APRIL 18 THROUGH APRIL 25, 2021 AS CRIME VICTIMS' RIGHTS WEEK WHEREAS, victims of crime across America need and deserve support and assistance to help them cope with the consequences of crime; and, WHEREAS, National Crime Victims' Rights Week offers us all the opportunity to promote Strength In Unity in helping victims~ and survivors of crime through a wide range of supportive services offered by over 10,000 community and justice system -based programs, and the more than 32,000 federal and state statutes that define and protect their rights; and, WHEREAS, by being united against crime and for victim's rights and services we gain strength as individuals, as communities, and as a nation as a whole, and offer strength to victims who seek to recover in the aftermath of crime; and, WHEREAS, America has joined together annually each April since 1981 to recognize the needs and rights of crime victims and survivors during National Crime Victims' Rights Week. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT PROCLAIMED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA that April 18 through April 25, 2021 be designated as CRIME VICTIMS' RIGHTS WEEK in Indian River County, and the Board honors crime victims and those who serve them during this week and throughout the year. Adopted this 20th day of April, 2021. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA Joseph E. Flescher, Chairman Peter D. O'Bryan, Vice Chairman Susan Adams Joseph H. Earman Laura Moss 3 1 PROCLA,MATION DESIGNATING THE WEEK OF APRIL 18 THROUGH 24, 2021 AS I NATIONAL VOLUNTEER APPRECIATION WEEK WHEREAS, volunteerism strengthens communities, improves social problems, and enhances the overall quality of life for all citizens, including children, seniors, those who are disabled, impoverished, imprisoned, homeless, physically or mentally ill, or otherwise in need of assistance; and, WHEREAS, volunteering changes the lives of volunteers in a positive way by increasing self- confidence, self-esteem and physical well-being; offering the chance to make new friends; and providing opportunities to learn new skills and abilities; and, WHEREAS, volunteering is proven to have a positive influence on businesses that are socially responsible by increasing employee morale, loyalty and teamwork, and building goodwill toward the company; and, ' WHEREAS, nonprofits, charities, community and faith -based groups, schools, volunteer centers, and national service programs in Indian River County have joined together with state and local governments in celebration and praise of volunteers who have given tirelessly and selflessly to the service of others. i NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT PROCLAIMED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA that the week of April 18 through April 24, 2021, be designated as NATIONAL VOLUNTEER APPRECIATION WEEK in Indian River County and the Board encourages all citizens to promote the spirit of volunteerism; to observe the appropriate activities, programs and ceremonies supporting volunteerism; and to participate and engage others in volunteer activities now and for as long as they are able. Adopted this 20th day of April, 2021. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA Joseph E. Flescher, Chairman f 1 Peter D. O'Bryan, Vice Chairman Susan Adams i Joe Earman Laura Moss 4 Z INFORMATIONAL ITEM Indian River County Inter -Office Memorandum Office of Management and Budget TO: Members of the Board of County Commissioners DATE: April 8, 2021 SUBJECT: 2nd Quarter FY 2020/2021 Budget Report FROM: Kristin Daniels Budget Director, Office of Management & Budget Following is the quarterly report for the second quarter of fiscal year 2020/2021. 5 a hod bw 0 as 4 0 6# _O c °D Nq O O �a t r� t c rn a a:E N s � — U at 5 U LL X C) i r O N It P M rlN 0 a) 0 N U c O N n L 0) O L C 0 U N O U C 57 N CL O OR v, 0 N n N N 6 N 'I 0 G v M 'O p� 00 ao 10 v _O c N 4) 4] LLU 0 Q E v p �.j 'c fl 69. O a N C CL o E U U 0. c N N T t co c d O � a 'A d N 0 0)a U N � ad) aa) N � a1 N 6 x .a a O ) a) 0000 0 N O v `p OO 'O ON a a N CN a O aP O O � 0 U O O `a a p a a a m z. EO 'j U U o o M d CL N N X df 0 N 7 a 0 a C (Daa aaoQi 0. Q� C p P > U N � M � O 00 ao i C9 N C� C N N C •00 O a a a O co" N a O N N N T 0 P O O. U O a O N Q _T O •S o u a U a d Q Cl N X ao O L c a�°a a a N O.O; c E P 0 d U N Q wU C4 N i 04 N V) 0 am � a o'. 0 a 0 6 O O. O U j P (x sr N 00 o: co I O o N (V N � O OL M H rR m 3 O0 a c a c C 0 6 N T E O 0_ 421- o 0 a m a Q m p O U C O 3 Ol co o; co � O 'o — N Lq v � Cl) N 69.T L Q d) C O U N z 'O LO N 10 O N T N M O� G a a) 0 .a m c a a) O E M P co E O U C N c 0 0 N Nq O C� N C O. a d 0 0. E O V O. E O U C .O 0 57 m m C lk m C L N h T G M O VI yCIL 4) U Q 12 N O 0) ) O 4) C O 4) V U U Q c O 4) U C O m H O `6 p _ (D E 0 4) 0 C U p 0 C C O C 0 C 0 u 0 0 7 m, N O N O N O N 10 � � 10 � � � v It 10 v � �'� r" 10 v I�r � 't r� r*l 600000066000610000606000 C cN5 O 0 O O O O O O O O O O 1 O O O O 6 O O O O 0 o o o 0 0 c O o m o E � Q i I I 'O V N Lo 10 M O Lo O Lo f\ N O O 0` 10 Cl) N N <t U 00 I, O M 'It O CN 0 0 0 0 CM a Lo CN '-t O �t O LQ�lll O� O I� O O� M S V O� M O� IO N llO 1� Lq M L Lo O, ri O, O, N O O Lo00 a CO CO CO O Lo N 10 M r, M CO r -,O I" M r,O� W N L � Lo n U W 10 N n M — N 10 00 I� � Lo O O N I I I 1 i 1 i z3 I � � O CL O � V 1j U v) C - 0) C: U N O `c s3 _92 2 Q -0O O U O U w O N Q 7 Eo U w Q w a `c E V)O O N w O _� Lu U QLU O w o Q `c a o c U� `c aE a O O V N N Q Q CL�`; <n 0 O O O t� \ O O X OC3a O C N v) W W D W c c C O uO c o .N N~ O \ \ \ \ \ \ 'o 'O -0 -O -0 -d O O O ah V) N �i 3 U 7 E N >,>. >, m m= _ a u LL LL LL LL LL LL 70 = W m C% u u uC: C p LL C U v) N N N N N N\\\\ c 0) 0) O) Q C\ j 0 U W O C c C c C C FO- IO- I=- 1=- C 00 N N N 0) O_ co 0 .- N N N N O N O N N V) ti N> N �, E E E = a o= Q s . i; C� (� U U C� U a h w w w M Z U v> = U O u m � I C`c 23 V V V '-t00 O, -.4- V d' Co I, 0, 'o 0` Lf) 7 O O O O O O O O O O O O � N N N N M M M W 0 O O O O O O O O O O �� M 0 O 0 W M O co O M Lr) Lo Lo O OO O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O -O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 000 O O O O V' t� 0 M r� LO O- O O O O O O, V O M O O r� Lo 0-�10 N U O, O, D` LO O` 10 10 M O O O, O O V' : M O O M O O 01 O O, M N M O O Ol N� N a O M O V' ,O OO OO M O N O hu� 00 OLrj N O O M h M 6� O� N �O O 00 O O O M O, O CO F N M 00 N U O O` O0 00 M M N U 01 N Cl) N N 01 N V IT CN O O N � > O O O O � N � O U> N > p U p O O O U > > > O N w O �\O CL UN„ > 70O u N cz >O > p O OodLLO2 w O � p N > ON 6 N > > O O w CL O N °° w O UU O o a) a >OO O> dT O O - = N N N NN7C a O o. o 0 a a O � X U0OCY) C Q d N UN 0N > O 6U O> CQd 0 \N O UCON p > > `O N N N U N \0 � N OONU Q OdU-wp U U U O O OU W CL O W O O\ L U o U Qm a a L”u p wwoo ° h O N Q> U D \ Q C 6°i LL- C C p � 0) OL w O O W d C 0 d OC N N N U U ' Q U 0 60 O C C C Q Q 0) 0) 0) � �U LQO Q CQ ~ 0 0 0 7C3 L: "OV) OC N V) NNNO E E p E v) V) w w w h__jU7S =U O O ON>>> n -N O U ai N � U O d V V N M M M O, U O, O O 0, LO M u') U') LO M N N LO O O O O O O O O O O O O N N M M V' O - -.�r r� 1" r� O O O d O O O O 0---- '- •- - M M M M V V 1t7 1-t --q LO LO CN �i LO LO LO LO r� LO LO O O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 N 10 co 0 � 0 N v O 'r '0 "o O "R IQ O 10 N 10 N 10 N V �- Q V) N O � O � C 0 O o U V p Q ) U Q) h C C 7 �j O O E Q N O N x W d .O O UC33 U u °� u C C ._ W O"O -O 6 U C C C C C a Q 0� 0 E W m m o Q- o f W C c C c E c O p W a� rn v c Lo = 0 0 0 0 0 0 v N O 16 o. O Go v 0 W O Z E U c O H 'o 6 CL G y O N U E O O O a) a) i C $ a! � E al v � -C - L n Q N 1 N u a > > N CL Q D O ° o o X O E O m ' N U � al O E a L- V a L.L O N a V c N 6 N N c 4 3 a) V c O D T m 'O- c O_ C .Q x�c � O wc Q D O a) .Q v `c w m > 6 E•- u S _a c V L O C � Z a� O 0) N t a O) c cc tG U N ' o U 0 O N C, o e v O N U O N O O a Q m E > O 4 7- o O U a a) a) � O N N IQ O O Cl) e IIRa co O O co O co 10 ti} co 10V (V Cl) 6-31 N O� CO N O` V) 10 t,4 N a M O 0 O M M tli t09- C: f}C ✓3 E 6 CL N Cl) O 0 '7 Ol n tH lo 04 N O P P N Iq N W tR U m 0 N 0 t U V M O 0 0 C C 6 O c rn �a 0) N L w +� cl� t Q U O a) a) j O � L EU (D E 6 N C T O O E Q Q- aa)) OO N a) C -U CO N n � h � N 00 n 00 00 tog. CO Ol Ol N .gy=m K 10 li P R Q P co M Go tri O P N N �O P ri M W M O M w a 0 V O 0 6 y E N O O O O a) o N E E o -C - L n Q N 1 O�t T > > a) D ° o o X O E > O fl_ U 6\ N O v' C E -6 N V a O N a V c N 6 N N c 4 3 p c a, Z z T — c O_ .Q x�c � O wc Q D O a) .Q v `c w m > 6 E•- u S _a c E L O C � a� O W' N t U O) c c O c L U a) O O > > U O O V > c 0 c E _0 N N c "c O C N N -0 a N O 0) Ox (D ° > O - c >_ j a) .� c mo � I >�� O E ) p z �'u U `l—, °o t9 ° N E C c p k E O ( Q U U Uc E 9° m c a 0 _ 6 T 6 > o 4 -OO o a E> C O a) 6 a N E+ E '� r U a a - U m a) ? c� U U N a) m U 6 0 N U N a- Q .c Q O .E U O ^O co I� N O E V n N a P O M h 'O O O M N O� W 0 00 M M � P N V' W P U '� h C a) `m 93 tl+ O r M ,O h O, O, W Ln N V 'o 01 w al b P 00 10 V n h O V O M O o to ' = a m � V = O Qd O P O n N M h N LO n - O V V co 10 Cl) co O 10 N 00 O N M M to (V Ln M 00 I, h N � M W v �o ' W OM W ^ O co 00 'O O al n V V (V O 1l: V LO b4 tR b., tPr tf} F } t? ' tH tPr tPr tf} to:} LO O O LO O co i _ O O O n n O W a s N OD W M co n r, O � ^ m O co U CO O d' LO F" Ln 'V' I, h N GV 4 N L a N tsP efr to+ to -r to+ v> ( j 'Al 64 e,o,r t,v t4 00 o 0 0 P ^ N C) 0 Cl) O LO cM OM M n n^ M O n � 00 n ^ W ^ � � N p) P � O ^ N ^ 'a I M 00 O, ^ a0 tR v} tR ti} 64 N ' t14 V} Ef} N} tf} I N O 0 LL M O C _ a U 'd � j o a ami ac) c LL u LL E N LL C � W Q- � N a a) O C EO N N - a O p) O) E E a a) U L x ( O L -O c _ 0 a Z 16 a� c U Ln O -o O N O co O 0 Or a O N O M O V O M O a o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (9 0 0 o 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 C C 6 O c rn �a 0) N L w +� cl� t Q U O a) a) j O � L EU (D E 6 N C T O O E Q Q- aa)) OO N a) C -U CO N n � h � N 00 n 00 00 tog. CO Ol Ol N .gy=m K 10 li P R Q P co M Go tri O P N N �O P ri M W M O M w a 0 V O 0 E O u N h d C d N K J O Z - C: D O U c 6 N C � O � O c CT O N U Ol U c E E O) T O O Q N Lo b9 O a CL N V v b�1 6\ M 0 O 10 O n N 64 M N N Lo N ef} O D U 6 O C 5 N N m 7 N Z N O H O U v CA OD V W t4 6\ (T M V h CV CO O d t9 O O M P lo e.9 CT CT CT CV op C") b4 i O i o j U N • � C i U O o U a � N eW O v O a z � N C > E 6 U E o T O O O U � ` S O � N N > O � Z �a o' U Q N N 1 6 C4 E N O Q U V i M O N 0 C 0 d Cl! O d -p rn a C W � u c w c as o N Ol M d N 7 C O O O Cl) } rn rq co `y M P - co Q o G O O m ~ cl co 2.O O h N 1., O 10 0. d O P n V LO Cl) m i Vi e>4 U N_ O C' W C Q U ' a Q .� u u. vWi a o � U � W N _p ce 6 W ~ Q ` F 2 Q W C V v O t+9 v b9 eq 76 N `a a �U C 6 c 6 N L O) L c �c C n a V Cl? M n b4 O 00 N tAl O O rlLO t,4 h W CT (T tf} e LO O 04 N 10 Ol Cr P LO CT b9 64 N Il 0 N 0 U 0 2) E N N O O N V -C -C U c :2i O O O O O O v v v v v O m N co CM wn Go co N fM P �O n M P R n O OlM N m co C co Iq n CN n 0 ri W) N O n n O M t? �O K P n M O n �O O n N IT N M N C 7 X Q v Q r C O m N N (f} b4 6\ O O 0 M N M to+ Cl) co N N co V n 64 Q a) T O C V L Q 6 m O O O M O S: U a C a) 6 C O E T 6 Q- E E a W V M 6\ O M Cl) n V b4 N N bf} V Loh CO W') O 69 O T a) Q N U c O 6 Q U 6 `c O U (D U c 6 C N `c U E a) 2 0 N h 64 V N 0 LO 10O O. CO N Cl) b9 M Cl) CV co -9- CN AN V V 69 U N T U C: a) 21 a) E c O 6 U .0 E E O U O a) N N P 04 N O v V CO Cl) V n b9 O Cl) M bar M M N V9. fol 0 c > � 6 O x 7 N � O O > C •N a O O N U N � 3 O _ � 6 t Q yj -a C Cc: .� C a) C Q- 2 N C � C O (D 6 O U U .S T M co O V b9 N_ b N Lq O 0. N Cb co Cr 10 ('9- 04 4N co N W M bg if CT Ca N b19 CA N In 69 N V b9 a) C N! N' U C a) S) O N c (1) clw N t\ b4 0 co b. N Cl) 00 N N b4 O O O Cl) v -i O O O O ({} N' a) U C: 6 C � 6 c a U C C 6 C S] (D O a) Q Q p U N N 0 a) N Q p T S)a) -06 Q Oc O t S) c CN c N z E 6 Q 10 N C S) 6 x C '� 4 C m N a) O a) '00' Q) N c0 O 9 D D 0-0 a) T a a) o a) H 6 S) C O Q O o O a) S) c C NN S) v c a) u � U O N� Q p .o a) Q Z C E C3 c N a U -6 '' O) Q c U 6) Q O 6 V U> FE- w Ci N O O. h N O N V 0. M O V h M M h M w M n CT O CT CO M O M I� V. D` N Cr CO 1, n M N 0• •O P Cr (V N V Z2 N N h M M V 0 b,!> bsr bq} b4 b4 b9 b9 bsr br, b4 bsr b4 N O n W I O •O •NO 7 O V M CT O. •O 0• V V n N CO V V - 0• V M V V M V •O N N O ^ O c`NO O CA LO N •O V •O � cl W O ( . n LO N VOO N .00 V N 0 n .0 co Cl) M V N M N N - N M 64 64 b9 b4 64 64 b4 l!i 1%} 69 b'T t09- Ln 4Ln M 0 O h r, 10 O v 1) LO N (), Ln n V Cr V O O co O N O N 0• M M n •O O O •O P al N O O O CO W W C) M V M 10 O N M N V Cl) 61). 69 69 Ffi bl) 69 69 b9 64 64 64 b9 O C, N O O P NM 00 10 0 O O Ln P n •O � N O O M O^• N CO O LO O •O 0, O •O Cl) Cl) O n O O N N LO O N L Cl) N I, N 64 e9- V9 64 64 to} K} b4 60+ bf} b4 O O N U E a) O O O U o o a) a 0 U C N Ua) a) C 6 U_ 6 •� O U Z Q 6 a) ¢ O C) N O Q N c CC) a) J '`p (U c a) O •C ti 3 a) S) c E c Q) O U U UO = E:> w d CO 0` OO n 01 N M V •O CO O N M O. 0 0 0 0 0 0 N M rl O A �`v CL E O O V uV, W) N C ai � Q o W y (- a) 01 a u W V O C O a) a C � CV vi al ' 0 C m \ a) X W 0 CV F - r Q � � u_ a) O CO m L a) m al N C O .Q U v z D LL u � Q z 0 O O (f} b4 6\ O O 0 M N M to+ Cl) co N N co V n 64 Q a) T O C V L Q 6 m O O O M O S: U a C a) 6 C O E T 6 Q- E E a W V M 6\ O M Cl) n V b4 N N bf} V Loh CO W') O 69 O T a) Q N U c O 6 Q U 6 `c O U (D U c 6 C N `c U E a) 2 0 N h 64 V N 0 LO 10O O. CO N Cl) b9 M Cl) CV co -9- CN AN V V 69 U N T U C: a) 21 a) E c O 6 U .0 E E O U O a) N N P 04 N O v V CO Cl) V n b9 O Cl) M bar M M N V9. fol 0 c > � 6 O x 7 N � O O > C •N a O O N U N � 3 O _ � 6 t Q yj -a C Cc: .� C a) C Q- 2 N C � C O (D 6 O U U .S T M co O V b9 N_ b N Lq O 0. N Cb co Cr 10 ('9- 04 4N co N W M bg if CT Ca N b19 CA N In 69 N V b9 a) C N! N' U C a) S) O N c (1) clw N t\ b4 0 co b. N Cl) 00 N N b4 O O O Cl) v -i O O O O ({} N' a) U C: 6 C � 6 c a U C C 6 C S] (D O a) Q Q p U N N 0 a) N Q p T S)a) -06 Q Oc O t S) c CN c N z E 6 Q 10 N C S) 6 x C '� 4 C m N a) O a) '00' Q) N c0 O 9 D D 0-0 a) T a a) o a) H 6 S) C O Q O o O a) S) c C NN S) v c a) u � U O N� Q p .o a) Q Z C E C3 c N a U -6 '' O) Q c U 6) Q O 6 V U> FE- w Ci N O O. h N O N V 0. M O V h M M h M w M n CT O CT CO M O M I� V. D` N Cr CO 1, n M N 0• •O P Cr (V N V Z2 N N h M M V 0 b,!> bsr bq} b4 b4 b9 b9 bsr br, b4 bsr b4 N O n W I O •O •NO 7 O V M CT O. •O 0• V V n N CO V V - 0• V M V V M V •O N N O ^ O c`NO O CA LO N •O V •O � cl W O ( . n LO N VOO N .00 V N 0 n .0 co Cl) M V N M N N - N M 64 64 b9 b4 64 64 b4 l!i 1%} 69 b'T t09- Ln 4Ln M 0 O h r, 10 O v 1) LO N (), Ln n V Cr V O O co O N O N 0• M M n •O O O •O P al N O O O CO W W C) M V M 10 O N M N V Cl) 61). 69 69 Ffi bl) 69 69 b9 64 64 64 b9 O C, N O O P NM 00 10 0 O O Ln P n •O � N O O M O^• N CO O LO O •O 0, O •O Cl) Cl) O n O O N N LO O N L Cl) N I, N 64 e9- V9 64 64 to} K} b4 60+ bf} b4 O O N U E a) O O O U o o a) a 0 U C N Ua) a) C 6 U_ 6 •� O U Z Q 6 a) ¢ O C) N O Q N c CC) a) J '`p (U c a) O •C ti 3 a) S) c E c Q) O U U UO = E:> w d CO 0` OO n 01 N M V •O CO O N M O. 0 0 0 0 0 0 N M rl 0 0 Z C (D E E O U r a N 2 O c 0 E N 4 E Z T 9 Hy 0, a co N co n M N CD M 00 6') M 10 N r" C M co N 69 V W (T 6a u U c 0 U O c O 0 a P V Cb v M V C>` P 64 O In h o -I O O N 64 O Q a N N N U c a 6 N c � c_ c a -C E oma Q) 0 � T � N m � U C: a 6 U 4) a 0 > t O U N c � CL -0a) H N O N M 6,9 co co N CO M V 64 h N C7 O M (V 69 O O O V 64 6\ O Cn N V co co 64 CO co b (T rsi h CEJ M 0 as 69 16, d n M N m 0 ice i a `c O o c E 0 N 0 w c N a E U � a L, c c U C c 4) c x O N N) a. O . c _a C: N U p N a L 4 N U Y a) d U O 2 Q I ^ N h x) O O N N (N N N 6\ O Cn N V co co 64 CO co b (T rsi h CEJ M 0 as 69 16, d n M N m 0 ice i O N N w O E U L, c c U c 4) c x O N a. E U _a _O N U c 4 N O- E aQ O (J' O 0 U N N U C � •U '� C � O � 6 `c (U C N `c N N NN U 0 N U > 0 Nt2 6 O j O 75 LL N N c a 6 U > U N Q 9 4 a a c 9> ami '� E° Q a ° E E E E .O O 'O O C)O E U c N N N N -0 O O0 O O ao c -o -0 -a a s 0 >O O 0 OE aZa 0O a O c c 0 C3 C3 a -U U_0 U 1a) 4s C3 0- 0 N c-0 0 0 0 c NQ NO) E a h N > aN m ca o m a s E u a 3 Q- c aci Q E T a 0 0 0 c U Z w � w 0 0 0° % w w x CC L t\ V V O C t-, N V N OP V V O N ^ O P V 1\ [�, P MO 1, a h co o_ 00 CrN on Vt,M vI.CO h O K CO h N 10 M M V O V 00 co o M O i N I(j O O O O O O C`7 I� 10 M O O O ^ O 1� O V CT U O V '0 O V V M W M I, M M M Cr 000 LO O ^ 1 ^�LO00W V V V O N V OM M V V 0.C�aaW N N V M N La V 'ON 'O ^ 1 W M O O (T W N M n W M �O 40 ^ h P ^ N 1- C, d M M V V ^ I� .O C' n 1 U Cn •- �O lO V O CO N n V N N M N mK) ^ m m ^ P M -- O Mrl_ Cn K C'7 a0 t� V ^ r CCN N n LO CT N P M ^ N N b4 tf} 1 6 } f T b4 64 6'4 b} 6Ri b4 ff} 6q' b'4 6f1 61) b4 d} O O 001\ N V N W 10 O. n V h 10 M M N M P O V O 1O N 10 n h r,CO N CO W U h CO 10 N N M O M n CO r� h ^ho P 17 O Ld o `) K CO T � CC Ki K ) CO n V M co N p P N ^ n10 N W) 64 64 1 64 1 64 64 6q tO 64 64 64 64 64 64 64 64 64 69- V). �2 co V N M W a LO N V W w N O V O 10 LO N N n Cn O �O M v) Vi IO O KI M '0 h N 00 - P O O C7 ^ ^ n n M ^ n Cn V' ^ KI h N CN Lo n W n h h P M 0� CO M .p N C* h M V N CV M LO ^ ^ 64 64 69 69. b9- //T b9 64 69- 64 6/} 64 64 64 64 b4 64 V} O 5 - c v U o -C c U c o U O c aci E U o U -a a w> N a . E N 0) -> E N C O Q O Z, C a N O N Q E E `_ 0 U N Q p O O N w Q a a O 0 c O O -� •� U Q 6 5 E O Y., E -E O — °' a o„ U x a O 4) 0 Q U a '� =0 0 U Q' Q U cca G W _N U 9 d N N U N CL CO G C ^� V V O- V O LO -- Cn N LO P 10 co 00 O O 0 O 0 0 0 0 0^ 0 0 M 0 V O r, O N N N N N 04 1 N N M V h d t\ U CT P 0, (� N V; N Ol 69 b9 n O O M M M b5 P P M b9 O Cl) M 00 P n to 00 P P ao vi P P 10 10 n C7 N ch b4 V LO 00 O 00 M tR W O N n b N b4 O N N tPr P N M V Cl) C) O bg V LO 00 O N to,)- O t\ V N Ffl c O T N Q (D U C O N -6 c N O � 6 C ` D Q O � � T 0) O 6 c U E N U '- c O O 6 Q aO C U CN V V Cli N N 11 ti} 1 b4 CO P CO LO O V V V 0 P O P 00 O 10 N 69. to cam') l ago I, N O 10 � n V � V � M �O to,). 16 , U O c LUN a O U C: 0 c -c o c c O Q7 d E CO2 > > 0 U w hn 04 1 O N i i 1 0 E a� x O N 0 .0 c (D C _ O p N U U E O N O O N O O O > U a -p x Q 6 C C . p 4) �O a 9 2) N O N U 0 � N N O N T a Evia m O O N h U U oo P O lo co V � tR V) � N h N 00 M N V O M N (0V N b4 b4 coN V N CO 1- 1� V t/f b N U V IP P I 1 1 �I I 1 O U N 1 p 0 o O 00 N V w O 0 a O 0 0 a� a E a E � N C C E N a N Q N a N E E D . -0 O -C C C o N ? xQ _ = ! O O W O. O 6 O F- E E Q QL U N O d N O N =. E N O Q C U E E x ° of of o? a� 6 h O H O a •� .0 N c N c c 6 c a O Q H 0 0 Q H O O Q O U O N o O c0 0 p 0 N o CL EE co Cl) 04'0 00 N P O O 00 V M h Ua U o N O 4) C h H O CL b4 b4 b4 to W C C) ( ^ 10 v O) N M C14 co 10 V O cc v� a a ( O M N N h n M N T v N NO co N V M c0 0 N m X i 0 o bq 64 b4 tf} d M_ M 'o Cl a OO \ t O 00 ,q N O M O O m .Ln. (j tfT b/} 64 b4 W n 00 M p) N N O 07 10 b P M 7 M O a W N � b9' EA 64 64 c a� O � •V U � U o `ccy,U 'o az c U C a D C - O Q O Q U a a o U N Z 1� 0 o O. o � O .— N V; N Ol 69 b9 n O O M M M b5 P P M b9 O Cl) M 00 P n to 00 P P ao vi P P 10 10 n C7 N ch b4 V LO 00 O 00 M tR W O N n b N b4 O N N tPr P N M V Cl) C) O bg V LO 00 O N to,)- O t\ V N Ffl c O T N Q (D U C O N -6 c N O � 6 C ` D Q O � � T 0) O 6 c U E N U '- c O O 6 Q aO C U CN V V Cli N N 11 ti} 1 b4 CO P CO LO O V V V 0 P O P 00 O 10 N 69. to cam') l ago I, N O 10 � n V � V � M �O to,). 16 , U O c LUN a O U C: 0 c -c o c c O Q7 d E CO2 > > 0 U w hn 04 1 O N i i 1 0 E a� x O N 0 .0 c (D C _ O p N U U E O N O O N O O O > U a -p x Q 6 C C . p 4) �O a 9 2) N O N U 0 � N N O N T a Evia m O O N h U U oo P O lo co V � tR V) � N h N 00 M N V O M N (0V N b4 b4 coN V N CO 1- 1� V t/f b N U V IP P I 1 1 �I I 1 O U N 1 p 0 o O 00 N V w O 0 a O 0 N T C O N O CL E o U �o d h N C W Q z u LJd O d v O0 N O m. N Q c CL O Q vs v � m a N x 1 Q O ' CL 4 W c O G T O O O H cc v v m Cr N N Q� 0 c C to} I to+ 6\ 9 co O M V v v tf} V V co co V9. R h V V+ N O co O P b4 C. LL LL O a9 v N 1,9 N T O c N O :Q 0 U 0 7 V O O U Cl) C14 n N tR IM O v co N co co N !A Cr P co tr4 W P n O b4 00 O Cl) N W LO N O tf} V 'V n M rH oo oo N In P N tf} O CU NO O O U+- U s3 U to 10 10 O rlN N b4 W h N M 69. - C ~ O 6 Q 6 � Q O N Lo 3 C: ,p 6 04 O t O O -6 N O O _N O O U C 6 v> C,l W N V M V v Cl) N Cl) R P C, tf} V n N tf} 00 Vi cM N V cV N tf} N i7 N a � m � C N N O x O z U c a LS O C c (D C C3 O E 'i3 a N 9 p E c U O C c - O p 6 U N O CL C C, U U P C U N N N Q J tf} 0 N W m 1!} M N h tf} V O Ln 69- C') N co O tf} t!} O) C 0 E U C x O_ N E N �? O N U O N U O � a O > U -a x O Q N E N N -O C O � � U p E N O N U ov V I 'O P V P M tR VY 1 0 0 N .`moo P 'T C I� co M P P I P V). N 1 V P N O^ O I V P. I N tf} Vi 1 co co acI O � U oD I tf} 4T 1 t O 6 H II r c ° IV t—I O p s z u N Q Z N c O C c O 0 c C iT Q W C _N N Q> > W O O O p O R'. Elf d P N N N N N04 - C ~ O 6 Q 6 � Q O N Lo 3 C: ,p 6 04 O t O O -6 N O O _N O O U C 6 v> C,l W N V M V v Cl) N Cl) R P C, tf} V n N tf} 00 Vi cM N V cV N tf} N i7 N a � m � C N N O x O z U c a LS O C c (D C C3 O E 'i3 a N 9 p E c U O C c - O p 6 U N O CL C C, U U P C U N N N Q J tf} 0 N W m 1!} M N h tf} V O Ln 69- C') N co O tf} t!} O) C 0 E U C x O_ N E N �? O N U O N U O � a O > U -a x O Q N E N N -O C O � � U p E N O N U ov V I 'O P V P M tR VY 1 0 0 N .`moo P 'T C I� co M P P I P V). N 1 V P N O^ O I V P. I N tf} Vi 1 co co acI O � U oD I tf} 4T 1 t O 6 H II r c ° IV t—I c O O O C a -c x m W= O M c M a .c U O N M � M U c d N D to+ O M 10 0 N LU D G r z W CL. N W toi O 0 LIOO 0 P j3 LU G Z Q W d N W t,+ LU Q I 3 w �- E O a "' z w LU H C � O Qu 0 a N T a Cl) O C a u a C N a x N 0) c E H a C O O 10 N If} O O Lq 10N t!-} tf} N O V) V 00 ts> N O N 4- 00 W t{} to+ v 6 N T V > a >' N E T CL rn C: H 6Q 00 O CO CO W P O M 69- 10 4V) t, J U z O U LU Cz G w O LU> ujU 0 Z 0 U w O O 00 O N In In N 0 O N N -r- (D (D t N C C a CL E a) al a� E W 0 V N V P O 10N 09,I M M tog P O O tf} LU " J w J LuV O O Lo N tb O CV 0 O U N O a O Z a C N 00 O, N CO rlz CT VJ tory' t o+ U 0 Lu od cz L 0 0 z z a V Z Lu N O P O P V M M O P L? N N CV 0 0 U N O a O) C O m C O e In -q- LO N V n N N M O N IIIA P N Ii0 LUW I z O' U ¢ m Lu z_ C) m Z 2 (10 O n O V O P N N CV 0 0 a N T _O v O - c a a c C a x N a) C E H 1 CI LO 1 . I n I � I P I � I 60} 1 I � I 6/} 1 U > W OI 1 V) W W 01 Ckf I - . W H O a i Cl) O1 L 1 O 1 T i O C O1 tor tf} Y 3 w ¢'I 0 ml zl, M LU In N O O N N P M 10 O N V 0 O N O N a J 9 N c c O O a U N C) N , N Cl) n V b4 In h CT I\ Ery N N co10 tog- - N Qi, J ' Q cU 02 O O L6 9 4 O CV V 0 0 U N .Q a 3 N Z a C V 10 00 N CO to+ V 10 W CV co ti} tf} U w LUJ z O N V) W W O 2' D_ W I 2' 0i Cl) V O O N M M O 4 N r O N It 0 U N �O Cl c O c C O a C O C CO CO 6y} O n M Cl) Ery to+ I Cie N x' rn 10 OI H x. P v Q 0 V) 10 O 00 n O O N V) 10O V 9 N LO O U N �O a a1. c. O c C O C3 C O W 6f, O Ib 10 69- tog- e+ 9-64 2 P 10 O N P v ui � I 10 b O 00 I\ O N 1010 10 O -, N M N o U N �O a D1 c O c C O V M vl N LQ 0, M to+ V' W c•i N V 60 9- 0 P N N to+ UI N .Q a- 0 O c C O a C V 10 O 10 N vi. 10 O 10 N fl+ 6T 11) Ne 0 0 m O Nt LO LO M O U O O U N �O a- 0 O c C O a C N V M M V., N t M Ip 10 ti} to+ U N o a 0 Z a C O O O 10 N t, } O O O O LO N 64 to+ zz uiC U O z LU3 I . K W =I W V 10 O O O V O P olO N 1 In N O u) ' O I In C0 00 N t!} Ip CO N 04 - to+ C t O a N z a E •c N 0 N U C C, O O N 00 LOP V b4 a O LO V b9- 00 M N to+ N Lu CL Z 0 CL M 10 Cl) O I- 10N N N O 5 D- a) w N co rn N U 0 O 0 V) N P CV co tf} O M t o+ O co N to+ P M M I h t09- -t 4V N V- 10 V I M t4 LO Ib O V N Mal UI � I of I N . W ck� I C ¢ i OI I I 1 I I O10I I M ' O I V L I 7 N I O V N M to+ N V V Cl) V t09- 'IT O too W LU LU > 0 O O V N V N N E N > O N L a M 9 O O O N to+ N N P O, h N m M 64 Z O m W z 0 UJ CZ L W OL W !Y O N N O V In V W P CC) M 00 to+ 00 Ib V to+ CO P Ci Cl) 64 LUU > W Q U ¢ OL Z 0 U K W S O O P V M O V L9 V E E N a N U c 2 a c 75 i D'I c1 C a c N 0 N U C 10 90 O_ M to+ N n v) Cl) O tf} N 10 O V V) N vi - U Z tn Z W 2 O N M V M O V h V 6 P, V V Cl) trr O Iq M bo, P N to+ N z 0 m m U z ¢ z W Z O q V M O V N V N T .0 a N N fl. E O U a N N rn ol Cl) O P Ib P t09- Cl) o+M LO M t09 - C, V In N Ery LU cz G 5 O LU > w U z ¢ z Z 10 O N V M O V V N a M In co tf} P -q- Ib Ib M ti} M to+ CO n h M to+ 10 N V 00 6} M In M 10 t!} LU J CL CLV) E Lu In 0 W LLQ 2 O N P Cl) OLO -I 9 V N V N tR n C1 V f4' P 10 O m too+ W ¢ 3 O w CL Cd L 0 U O N LO M O V V N U C m E N U a a N a C M V M 0 Vo+ t Cl) V M 0 'It t/} 0+ n 00 N b.)- 00 o+of n N O, N to v tf} Q z U z > o W U z U w LUO 10 N O n O N P V M M O CO M h ;0- C) O N to:)- 0 o+O Cl) M ti} O O V to)- V) o+In LU U ¢ r W IL 0 U z 0 U IY LUO N N O O P M M O 00 M D N GaC v) Q 3 O 0 W 1 m � I 0 c 01 M It OI 00 ( CO N I I NI 41V9. n c�7 D P V V N 4 1 t o+ D P D W M -r S LU x 06 W W J w > Z C Q > j z r N N O V N 7 In N r v c O a c a a x W E E N Q N U C a 7 C a C C a C N a, � I U c h Lo M CT N N loO N N N 10 O L6 (T to+ U Z Q w z w Lu 2 O O Ln V M O N N L") O N i g co co0 O V M M bo Cb O O M n bq 00 O 10 M b4 LUz a LUW Lu7- 0 O U Z Q Z z Q 2 O CT lom O N N h O N i lo CT c bo 00 V) V n co tog- 04 loM V tori Luz CL LU ujz O > U O CY LL Q z O N V N Lo co O N N L? O N V U 7 L Q o� N C c O N' E. N U _O Q N N CT Lo n x7 O M 10 M CT Clc) lo bo Cp CO 10 M bo i 0 CT CN co ttr O N O N M t,-)- 0 oO V CT CT bo ujz CL CL 0 } LU LU Z_ 2 U Q z W 2 O O (T V lo lo O N N L9 O N i b4 too H W O cLcL z O zQ U U Q > N N w O N N O N RE 69- Lu CT ) v)uwj - 9 OOaa CC ) oo n ('I O bo oo M O 1) t)} bo U z O Z O G Z O v O U N O O (T m M M O N n LoV V N U N •O Q a) E- 0 O C O h N CYJ 10V b9. M CT M too r, N N CT bo z I -- u) tY O Z x U r, O H U v O O n N O N n V V N 0h0 U N .O Q a) C O O) C O 9 M O M O Zq N M v v bo co N N O N v' 64 V N n bo z 2 E O Z 2 U Q M O H U v O O n V O N n Lo V V N MoM0TbN O M N N h bo 0 co N N 1) v b-, v+ U_ > J Q U Q z O U Lu 2 O N O W P O (T V M M O V U) C!) O CO N M N V Co N b4 N V 7 O M N bo ter uj U Z Q SQN Q Z } Q d Q z L N M W co CT L? O N N M N- 0 0 O 04} w O C 2 o 0 x C W M N bo m M N n 10 b9 - O P CT O 2 v M 0 Q aE U O U M O co O N O M n loO V M o M N 0 O } w O C a U Q 2 C N O O V oNt,9- 04 O O V t!} bo N a 0 2 v 0 O x O U Q V O W O N O M loM O V A o M N 0 O N } w O C a U 0 x a C M M O O 2 b'i oD O O obo.9- too N ai 0 2 v (T 0 U z O U 3 z lo O W O N O M rlloM O V M o loM N 0 O CNw O C a 6 0 2 a C lO Lr) 1) too d 10 b4 eq- a, o rn O 2 v J M M 0 N Q D2 U O U n O M O N O M lo M O V o b loM N C) O } w O C a U M 7) x a C lo W M M V b9 lo O M M V too b4 N O N w O C a U 0 2 a C lo N q V 10 too lo Lo Iq V 10 tog too O a U o 2 n O 0 Z af i w Cr O 00 O N O M lo M O V to oM M N- O N w O C a U 0 M x a C I\ N a V bo r, N of n V b09- e+ w 0 a 0 x J 0 v v O N w O 2 Lu W O N O M lo M O V 10 Lo M o M O O O O N bo 0 O O 10 cn Z C� 11) Lu v) m z N ' h w O CT V) Lo O M O P N 0 O CT 0 N O bo bo U Q5 O O 2 U U O oD W O CT 10 O M CD 10 of N bo Cb 1 CT to bo 2 U Q ujcaO w > 0 } U O M co OO CT -40O P M w I w Lu N I J I Lu I Il O. � I U c O 0, 10 O N O 10 v bo O h Zq 10 V tf} b4 Z W Q a. 0 J Q Lux Lu Q N O O� W co O CT lo 0 CT M L0 q b9- L0 4L0 S Ef} tic�- V Lr) bo V Lo M bo z Q Q m LuO } U O N N co Cb O CT N 0 CT M O Lo o, N too O Lo o, n N b9. bo x J Q Lu c2 CL C O U v) Q O U v) w F- V m O O CT lo h 0 CT M N CT V M bo N CT 7 M bo too N CV V too V N N '7 bo v� w Q x U a_ w 0 w z O CT co O N N Lo CT M O n Cp too O LO LO tf+ v9- z O Q N Z O U w w O 3 O V N O N N Lo O N CT M Lo Cl) C, too N n M CT bo bo (12 (12 Q x U I— 0 LULU z O CT (T co M O N N Ln 0 M n N M too n t\ CV M bpi too 10 Lu _U W Q Z O V) O W rL w w x O O (T M O N 0 N CT M NAE J Cl CL C� Z Q w a O w w 2 O O CT N LoM O N O N CT M tri W O V V 6�} uj U_ > Uf W Q Z O V) O W a 2 O O O� M M O a 0 CV CT M N 1) N >- r N M U U U L N OD •� n C C C) a 0I, H O U N Q Efi ' LU ^ C O a c a 0. x w W Q I Y Z W O. NLU C o Lu I Z p W C4 X N w O U O N Z) a U Q w 1Y Q U O C 7 O U U O 0 N z O c CT N w 10 CT N n W to', t09 U > oofw W' O Q J iU W U Q z O v O n V co M O h (X1 N N CT M n n M LO M yr n r' Cl) LO Cl) 69- b4 U z Q ujz r Q W Q O O 00 00O Cn C70 N N M bt} tfr U z Q N N H LLJ `Z r J z [ tf N O M M O 11) M N N CT M CT O N CT O N V t"- . tF> U Y LuJ Q z O N N W LL ow 0- o O O M M O M LO (T N N CT M N (T 04 N (T N V) to+ HT 0 Q U W w Q 3 2 L w O U O LO M O (16 U) V' N M M Lo n 10 CO LO 1-1 10 ter h W 0 Z H LU W O W S O C, N N m M O M N V N CT M H} tsr z LU od r W W z S U Q w W 2 O O CT V 10 10O M N V N CT M 90 N W 110 yr W N 00 b<r b4 O U LU J O U X Q W W W N Z w O 0 oo m O n O CT CT O ✓j 00 N O O V CT M M M Cb 00 V t� Cl) M 0i Cb V t,4 t/r 1) O CT OD 'V trr LO O CT Co V tfr t<r H Z W U O W Z W Q LL , S N O O CT CT O W O O M 6 N a O V Q N C N X N 1) S E O C V) n N N V t4 10 n N LO V to* b<r v) O rY W W Q z Q Q n b O CT CO 4 to m IO O Oi O 'V a a a N > N t C N E T O Q V rn S E 9 N V] O V) V M b`r CT M v) 10 tfr 10M rll, C) Cl) t4 z Q tY U z_ Q Z N Z m O U Q V N O (T O V M O Lo rl N V) w O Cl) U N 'o Q 3 N z O C LION LQ N t,+ N h rlN tfr tfr Q Z UJi W O W Z O Q U L O U O h V 10 10O N N O N h M U N O Q c O Is C O 0 V) M CO CO 1O N M b4 M Lf) V O V Z, ' L Cb N 00 tfr w U z Q a O U LO N W 0 < W 0 O m V O O O 1010 C3 O N N h O N h M OD CT P O CV t,9- 00 CT 'I Cl) N to f O O O (n n b4 O N [Y W W N z C, D Z n w O_ N CT O 00 d, CT U N O Q 0) c O rn c O 04 N M LOO CT rZ '7 M to', O V V LO Cl) tfr O LO b etr z Y Q CLY Q 0 (Y Q m m w W } O CT O O O O m M V1 10O N rlO N h M U N O 11 rn c 0 0) c O O C O 10 N O � I h N b9l Q LUQ > OL w 11)Z O U w C¢ O J Q x n N O (T O 1O 10O N P, O N h M U N O • Q 1) c O 0) c O c a 1 C N n N N ( ti ( N 1 n i N i i N I &9- i yr ( O U 0 S � c- N I N 1 W ( J v > Q 1 0 i L ' M 00 n O < '0 O V N ( M ( U N •O O_ 0) c 0 rn c O el V) co V LO 00 O tov 10 M M `4- t, t, } M N t9r ol U N •O O_ 0) c O rn c O 0 C 1\ V I 00 N ' 6.r n V _W N tf} O O n z O cQ G J W > 2 W Lo M N O �2 O_ V) 10O V N V N M U N O Q 0) S O rn c O: V, 'V 10 O 00 CT N ' etr i O b4 O M IO N U LU N I W I W H z 1 D � J 1 m 1 .6 1 r Cl) O (T 1 O ( 1 O0 V ' V ' N M ( N D c 0 t .a N O s -c O U C O' CO IQ C•S 00 b9 O M M OD 64 t09- (D 4CD 0 CbW LU X LU Z w w W O W W w W S O C CT M V) V) O (T O N N h Cl) U (D •O Q 0) c Oi 0 O I V LC) N N N M P CO b:} N CT V M V tR O CA 10 to+ > W W Lu U Q Q 2 Y W W O,I O Ui N N O CT O h 10 O CT N O N M U N .O 0)I O 0) c O Cb V n V CT CT tor N O O N fAt 10 h V Cl 04 609- o fr O (Y r 02 m Z Q Cl) O O O N O to 10 10O CT O N U N �O Q 0) S O Is c OI C, N V N tfr N PI V N tPr tsr Z O Q ui cw L O. F� > CL u Wr M O O h 10 10O CT h O N', M LO U CT 0 b4 N CT CT CT V) tR Vr z LLJ 06 r Z S U Q 2 O O [T V 10 V) O M h N N M O' 6 C O N U C N > 3 c O t Q e O N CT 'V Iq N N e+ n N R M h tf} W N m Z LU LULU U O W Z ui3 Q S N O V O CT C, OO -10W O O o y O 0 N 6 Q N w C N t O U N 8 `c a Q e N N 00 M 69- M 4M 00 O V V N b4 O V N N b9 Q J N w Z) ow w O N O 'I M f) t\ N V C O O E c O O N a C 0 9 N 0 M V) OO OO O V., CO n O V) n tR LO N n tf} LIJ U w W N U Z w z z w C' M M M O V M N n LO Iq n LO CT CT F tR Iq O V tf} LU U_ > LU olfQ z O N N W W O CL LU W S O O CT M O V M n N V 7 N Q N U C 6 C 6 c C O C N a m U c e 10 O 00 C10 OD V b<r V V n V M bti V) OX LO N M to U Z Q it Z LU CY 2 O O CT LO R O V M h n W n V) n O LO tsr n V) q tor O O CT O V) V tsr W a 2: CD U O CD C a Q o6 N Q c N a 2 U c e N 00 O LO CO V M b4 V 1\ t4 O N V - tsr Lu 5 IY > O 6 O V N M M N v V v Cr) IIR 10 M b4 V) n N co ti} V LO V t} LU Q 3 r - LL O LU LU O U O M M OO V N M M N v a U O C Q .6 N Q c N 0 2 U C: bR N V V LQ h N 69- 0 40 M 10V V9} N CT O Cl to+ N uj LWL cz cz U w U O CO V) h. O 'I N M M N v V C o 0 C a a x W C W Z Z W N o X W W E a Z C O u u Q C 0' O u u Q E 7 E N Cl N U C U 7 C O 7 C C U c a a� U C M co O M 64 I\ M N b4 M M 00 O N b4 U N 'o Q. 3 Z C M (V LO 64 h Cl) cq LO b4 b4 Z U J d LU X O Q LU3 3 Q F - z LUU N N O, C� 10 V V O b M L" O N V U N 'o a ro Z C o O O LO "'9- 10 410 O O h 64 tog Z LuU Q iiLu Doe N Q 3 Q 3 3 3 N Lo U OOH IT 10 V V O M N 00 N V U N .a a Z C M N n O L b4 M N O v) b4 z LULUU Q CL w Q 113 N Q >w 3 Co N h U OOH U 10 V V O M 10 W n V E 7 N Q- C: C U 7 I C O ' 7 C C O C : d i U j O N ' LO ' V b4 C, � 1 1 "q- (1) M b4 � a, C, M 1 0 U N .O Q c 'O C O a0 h N, M N b4 10 IQ O N Cl) 64 V O 7 64 O �i Lu 0:�I od W Q 2 3 o V) M O N O� P 10 V V O Cl) N N V U N a a3i Z 6 C O 1 O ' W i n 1 b4 I O O 00 1 n 1 b4 b4+ U Q J 0 - LU w i C ' 7 i O W J O'I w 1 Z O' U � o, OI LL 3 ' N (,I: I Lo 1 P f O, f 1 ' V O M 1 In 1 O� N t n I V ' U N O d c O rn C O n O C, V V V b4 Ib V b4 O n V b4 Z Q LLJ OI Z O Q 1- J 3 M M LO P O, P V V O d M 19 U N n V U N 'o Q a3i Z O C O r, n u) b4 O rlM N LO b4 b4 Q x W ao J J 3 O 12 z O V P O�, Ol V V O M h U N V U N 'o Q z C LO 00 W 69- 10 410 W 10 W bq b4 Z LULLJU Q CL w w W LU OI co 10,M tT rn V V O M 1 M i N V E 7 E N Q N U C U 7 C O 7 C C O c m U C h CO O 04 N b9- ,I 4M a IT b4 co M M n b4 Lu Ui Z Qi U N 'o Q 3 Z O C M N N M b4 V a0 N N M 4b4eq- b.). U Y U Q CLY U' Q O J LL � I Q 0 M O Ln a o� N V V O M M b N v V U N .o Q 3 a) Z, C,i M o O 00 64 M U O W b4 b4 Q IL ujU Q IL W Q O U' LO Ln C, O, Ol V V O M CO N n V U N 'o Q 3 z O C N q CO V 61) N q M V b4 b4 Q CL Lu z_ Q W N 3 N O h N U V V O M h M N n V U N 'o Q 4) z O C O O N N N 69- 0 4O O h N 64 b4 Z Q LU U O J CD �I ,. v) x 0 I N O, P V V O M 9 O N I\ V I E 7 E N Q U C a 7 C a 7 C C O C a C � I O O 10 N b4 U M Cl U e4 M 00 M n b4 U N 'o Q 3 Z O C O CNU LO b9- C:) 4O N rn -40 LO b4 1 b4 Q CL LULUJ Q > Z O coco Q 3 C, P O, IT V V O M LO a 0 N V C, O W N b4 M O, n Lo P 64 W P 10 t09 - N H Q CL O V Lo Lo Cl) O OK LO N V N LOO E 7 E N Q- C: C O D' C O 7 C C O C Q) m U 04 N a M 10 O M vi P N V M u) b4 V O n O b4 LU U Z Q Z W x O O P V M O M h V N 0 LO U N 0 Q Z d C M N V) N b4 M n N N b4 b4 Y U Q Q LU m U Z Q Q W Z 0 N O O N O M v) V Cl) O h V N N O LO H C N E N N E U C a) O m U C V M U V (N b4 M N M V h b4 N 10 U V N 64 Z O Q Z ujCL O U Y O 3 O N O N Lo O N O LO O N U M b9 - ,4: 4V rl 10 N b4 W) V M N N b4 O uW. Z 0 Q J m W V O O� Lo N V O LO N M 10 N b4 M LO Cl a N N b4 O O� N O, N b4 W W LL O O N W V M O O� Lo ri N q- 0 O 0 N O N O 7 Q N LL C O O Q O U N 0 LL C) O V V) O N 64 O V O, Cl) b4 0 N M M 00 b4 LLj E J Q J n V O N O M u, V 4' LO O LO N O o M N b4 n W Co n 64 O n M (D N b4 x J Q LLID-- .6 Lu J U Z Q K z O CO N O M W) V N LO O N U C h M P LO b4 M N LO b4 b4 LU Z O x d W O V M O C`7 h V N N O LO CO O O N b4 W V I\ O co bf} M n M 0, 64 uj O w W F CL C> G ' O U O LO O (7 N V N 10 O O M W) V b-)- 't 4V oN Ln b, V b+ O` O n N Ct O rl 0�: a.M C M N N LO N �O t? K �O O �r N 0 N ?24�00-- i INDIAN RIVER COUNTY OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET PURCHASING DIVISION DATE: April 12, 2021 TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS THROUGH: Jason E. Brown, County Administrator Kristin Daniels, Director, Office of Management and Budget FROM: Jennifer Hyde, Purchasing Manager SUBJECT: Rejection of Bids for 2021010 —JRTC Ticket Office Building Renovations (IRC - 2020) BACKGROUND: On behalf of the Public Works Department, sealed bids were solicited for interior renovations to the existing Ticket office building located at Jackie Robinson Training Complex. The minor renovations were designed by Edlund, Dritenbas, Binkley Architects & Associates, PA ("EDB") under a purchase order, and were to include drywall replacement, wall relocations, removal and replacement of selected floor coverings, ceiling grid and tiles, and some minor plumbing upgrades. BID RESULTS: Advertising Date: Bid Opening Date: Broadcast to: Bid Documents Obtained by: Replies: October 18, 2020 December 3, 2020 437 Subscribers 27 Vendors 8 Vendors Firm Location Total Bid Price Proctor Construction Company, LLC Vero Beach $291,522.82 De La Hoz Builders, Inc. Sebastian $313,346.00 Boromei Construction, Inc. Okeechobee $338,618.00 Summit Construction of Vero Beach, LLC Vero Beach $363,632.80 Bill Bryant & Associates, LLC Vero Beach $382,754.00 All -Site Construction, Inc West Palm Beach $416,383.00 Encop, Inc North Lauderdale $437,839.00 Matcon Construction Services, Inc Tampa $494,287.00 The engineer's estimate for the work was $415,000. Staff was preparing a recommendation of award to Proctor Construction Company, LLC as the lowest, responsive and responsible bidder. However, further inspection during an assessment by Wood Environmental identified significant 21 additional repairs that need to be made to the ticket office. Staff has asked EDB to provide a modified scope of work to modify the project plans and, once complete, staff would like to rebid. Funds for the necessary modifications to plans and specifications are available in the Construction in Progress/JRTC Improvements Account (31522019-066510-17003), provided through the Optional Sales Tax. The cost of legal advertisement for the new bid is estimated to be $220. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Board reject all bids received in response to invitation to bid 2021010 and authorize staff to modify the scope of work and readvertise the project for bid. 22 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA MEMORANDUM TO: Jason E. Brown; County Administrator THROUGH: Phillip J. Matson, AICP, Community Development Director THROUGH: Bill Schutt, AICP, Chief, Long -Range Planning FROM: Matt Kalap, Planner, Long -Range Planning DATE: April 7, 2021 SUBJECT: REQUEST TO APPROVE THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT (CDBG) THIRD SET OF HOUSING REHABILITATION BIDS (3 BIDS) FOR THE COUNTY'S -.HOUSING REHABILITATION CDBG It is requested that the following information be given formal consideration by the Indian River County Board of County Commissioners (BCC) at its regular meeting of April 2& 2021. DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS On July 10th 2018, the BCC authorized the Comm unity Development Director to apply for a Housing Rehabilitation Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) for the unincorporated portions of the County. Subsequently, the Florida Department of Economic Opportunity (DEO) awarded a $750,000 grant to the County and the County hired a CDBG consultant, Guardian Community Resource Management to administer the grant. ` Since then, the consultant has worked with courity staff to undertake the required steps to proceed with block grant implementation. These steps included soliciting and obtaining intake application forms from income qualified homeowners in the unincorporated portions of the County (during the month of October 2019), ranking those applicants, procuring services from abstractors, lead-based paint inspectors, and general contractors, soliciting for qualified contractors to bid on rehab projects, soliciting and awarding bids for several of the housing units, and undertaking rehabilitation of those housing units. I 23 CDBG Applicants With respect to applicants, CDBG rules require that they be reviewed for real and/or perceived conflicts of interest by both the CDBG Citizens Advisory Task Force (CATF) and the BCC. On January 10th 2020, the CDBG Citizen's Advisory Task Force (CATF) reviewed the list of CDBG applicants and Pursuant to Section E(3) of Part II of the Housing Assistance Plan (HAP) the CATF members in attendance determined that no conflicts of interest exist. Subsequently, on February 18th 2020 and, on December 15th 2020 (for newly elected commissioners) the BCC reviewed the list of CDBG applicants and also determined that there are no conflicts of interest. Rehabilitation Bids With this Small Cities Housing Rehabilitation CDBG, at least three sets of bids spread out over a year were anticipated; the project has been proceeding accordingly. On August 5th 2020 the County issued invitations to bid on the first four houses. Bids were submitted by the September 4th 2020 deadline and ranked in accordance with CDBG requirements. On October 6th 2020, County staff requested that the BCC approve the first four bids for the Housing Rehabilitation CDBG. Since that approval, County staff coordinated with the County's CDBG administration consultant to complete the necessary contracts and forms and, rehabilitation work on three of the first four homes has been completed (the fourth home is approximately 90% complete). An invitation to bid on the second set of four houses was issued on September 28th 2020. Bids were opened on October 20th 2020. Subsequently, those bids were ranked by the County's CDBG consultant and approved by the BCC. Rehabilitation of those four homes is currently underway. On January 14th 2021, County staff issued the third invitation to bid on CDBG rehab projects and held a public bid opening on February 16th 2021. Five contractors participated in that third bidding process, De La Hoz Builders, Inc., A213 Development, LLC, Kib Construction, Patriot Response Group and, Ka11Kell Builders, Inc. The County's CDBG administration consultant has reviewed and ranked those third set of bids in accordance with CDBG requirements. At this time, it is requested that the BCC review and approve the next set of three (3) Housing Rehabilitation CDBG bids (Attachment 1). ANALYSIS Rehabilitation Bids In regards to evaluation of the bids, the County's CDBG HAP generally requires submitted bids to be ranked by price and that bids be awarded to the lowest responsible bidder within plus or minus fifteen percent (15%) of the pre-bid cost estimates. Section H(3) of Part II of the County's HAP (Attachment 2) provides exceptions to the scoring and awarding of bids as follows: 24 1. Minority Owned Businesses and Women Owned Businesses (MBE/WBE) may be given preference over a non-MBE/WBE contractor if the MBE/WBE contractors price is within 15% of the pre-bid cost estimates and the MBE/WBE contractors price is higher than the lowest bid/bidders price; and 2. No contractor may be awarded more. than two bids per bid round. While priority may be given to MBE/WBE firms, and the County has a cap of no more than 2 bid awards to the same contractor per bid round; the County has the right to reject any and all bids and to award bids in the best interest of the County and applicant. For all of this round's projects, the CDBG administration consultant recommends the County approve the lowest responsible bidder. In two of those three cases, the low bidder happens to be a MBE/WBE contractor (De La Hoz Builders, Inc.). A complete bid tabulation is included as Attachment 1. Outlined in the table below are the consultant's recommendations for bid approval' and amounts to be utilized from CDBG funds. -Applicant.Name and Address Total Bid CDBG funds Contractor Dawn Womack 155 47th Avenue, 32968 $53,498.00*. 100% De La Hoz Builders, Inc. Angela Young 4281 36th Court, 32967 $32,500.00 100% Ka1lKell Builders, Inc. Deloris Morgan 1056 9th Street SW, 32962 $72,413.00 100% De La Hoz Builders, Inc. *WBE/MBE firm, **No Contractor can have more than 2 bids awarded per round FUNDING Funding in the amount of $158,411 is budgeted and available in account number 12913054-033490- 19802, CDBG Grant Fund/Other Contractual Services. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners review the attached Bid Tabulation and approve the following bids; Dawn Womack (155 47th Avenue, 32968) to De La Hoz Builders, Inc. for the bid amount of $53,498.00; 2. Angela Young (428136 th Court, 32967) to Ka11Kell Builders, Inc. for the bid amount of $32,500.00; and 3. Deloris Morgan (1056 9' Street, 32062) to De La Hoz Builders, Inc. for the bid amount of $72,413.00; and ATTACHMENTS 1) Round 3 Housing Rehab CDBG Bid Tabulation with Consultant Recommendation 2) Section H(3) of Part II of Indian River County's Housing Assistance Plan F:\Community Development\CDBG\2017-18 CDBG\BCC Items\Bids\Round 3\BCC APPROVAL of BIDS V3 (with funding source).doc 25 N ti rA C R O E ti CQ C ca 0 is a �� o M O �OO O ` �i O O O O O m i t7 N (aUO?JO Vit) Mg 1S q16 9901 M o N ^o. 4 CO G ao ,o ui O s O c x In °° .rte d c °° rn °° x i e ° ^�R - O O O O O ni ri O OO S O O (2unoA) 1Z),glgE tgzb f" O 2 O O O O 00 00 N M N M 0 as 4 D co n � M � M ra C M m M C cd O y^ Q � - O co o 0 °o �° °o o° °o `r M co (puuzoM) aiiV glLV 991 ° 00 0 •°oma o t e L CO N � � 4 Ln x co 00x " 9 .E L o C •r � R � y a ce O r i 0 Piz a y po v> N S U V Q• r b p f FSI o 0 x x o a 04z °' a N ti rA C R EXHIBIT A INDIAN RIVER COUNTY CDBG-HR HOUSING ASSISTANCE PLAN (EXCERPT: PAGES 38-40) H. Bidding Bidding of potential CDBG and DRI units is conducted by the HRS in conjunction with the County Procurement/Purchasing Department. Applicants review the pre -approved list of eligible contractors before their cases are sent out for bids. Applicants have the right to remove any contractor(s) from the list of prospective bidders for their unit, as long as the removal request is based on non-discriminatory, non -bias, or other non -subjective reasoning and at least three (3) eligible contractors are allowed to bid. The Applicant must be willing to justify the removal of contractor(s) from the bidding list. Applicants may also request additional contractors as bidders. If these Applicant - requested contractors submit the Contractor Application and are approved by the PA and are otherwise eligible, they may be added to the bidders list and bid on the housing rehabilitation work. The HRS will make maximum effort to ensure participation by minority and/or Section 3 owned contracting firms. Under CDBG and DRI, the HRS shall qualify and recommend all contractors and other necessary vendors (lead based paint, asbestos, title search, mold, appraisal, land survey, environmental, etc.) for work the HRS recommends or the program requires on eligible units. In these cases, the County policies shall govern the qualifying and award process, including this HAP. No housing unit owner, occupant, or immediate relative of the same, eitherpersonally or corporately, shall serve as a contractor or sub -contractor to be paid with CDBG funds for the rehabilitation of said building, nor shall they be paid for their own labor with CDBG funds for the rehabilitation of said building. A notice is sent via email, fax or U.S. Mail to each eligible bidder to inform them of the job. Bidding notices will be posted at primary governmental buildings to the maximum practical extent. Advertising for individual jobs will be conducted as necessary but will not exempt contractors form the requirement that they must be pre -qualified. 1. Notification to Bidders (NTB): The HRS or assigned Housing Staff will notify previous program approved Contractors of the availability of the work order and establish a date for the pre-bid conference and bid submission deadline. Bids are opened in the public at the designated time and bid tabulation is prepared. 2. Pre -Construction Meeting: An onsite meeting will be arranged between the homeowner, the approved Contractors and the HRS to review the scope of work and site considerations. This meeting will also serve to allow for Contractor and homeowner introductions and questions. Any questions that arise from the onsite meeting must be submitted in writing to the HRS who is required to answer the question in writing and submit it to all approved present Contractors. Questions may not be answered less than seventy-two (72) hours prior to the established bid submission date. Each contractor MUST attend this pre-bid conference held at the approved unit to be rehabilitated or inspect the house under the Applicant's supervision. Failure to do so will result in automatic rejection of his/her bid(s) for the unit(s). 3. Bid Submission and Award Recommendations: Bids will be submitted on the date and time established in the Notification to Bidders advertisement and awarded in compliance with the HAP requirements and the terms set forth in the NTB advertisements. Sealed bids will be opened at a public bid opening. The HRS will generally recommend that the contract be awarded to the lowest responsible bidder within plus or minus fifteen percent (15 %) of the cost estimate. Bidding procedures will adhere to County purchasing policy. Bids below the fifteen percent (15%) threshold will be reviewed and are not automatically disqualified. minus ten percent (10%) contingency will be assessed for all Section 3 and/or W/MBE firms at the bid opening to ovide incentive, opportunity and encourage the participation of such established business types in accordance withiHrJD requirements. All bid awards will be made available to the participating Contractors and homeowners j----- IThe PA reserves the right to_reject any and all bids and to award in the best interest of the Applicant,and ffhe Applicant must approve the bid award prior to signing contracts. ,No_contracto� wwill-be aallowed-to have more than-two(2) fobs per bid round) , with a maximum award of three (3) jobs under construction at one time without consent of the PA unless: a. The anticipated date of commencement is after the scheduled and estimated date of completion of current jobs; or b. The contractor has demonstrated, through past performance, his/her ability to satisfactorily complete multiple contracts in a timely manner thereby causing no impact on project and program completions. This rule may be waived by the County Commission if it is determined that there is an inadequate pool of qualified bidders, if the other bids are excessive, or if other extenuating circumstances arise. 27 Attachment 2 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA MEMORANDUM 7s CONSENT I TO: Jason E. Brown, County Administrator THROUGH: Richard B. Szpyrka P.E., Public Works Director James W. Ennis, P.E., PMP, Assistant Public Works Director FROM: Rob Skok, Infrastructure Project Manager SUBJECT: Amendment No. 1 to Work Order No. 1, Atkins North America, Inc. 6th Avenue Milling & Resurfacing from US 1 to 211t Street IRC -1638 DATE: April 7, 2021 ' l DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS On March 5, 2019, Work Order No. 1 to Atkins North America, Inc. was approved bythe Board of County Commissioners in the amount of $168,940.00 forthe design services, including permitting & biddingfor the project including the milling & resurfacing of 6th Avenue from US 1 to 211t Street. The purpose of Amendment No. 1 is to provide additional compensation to Atkins North America, Inc. for services regarding design changes requested by the Florida' Department of Transportation, which is funding up to 75% of the project. This amendment for a Not -to -Exceed amount of $18,731.25, brings the total for Work Order No. 1 to $187,671.25. 1 FUNDING Funding in. the amount of $18,731.25 is available from Secondary Roads/6th Avenue resurfacing/Account No. 10921441-053360-19008. Account Name j Account Number Secondary Roads/ 6th Avenue Resurfacing (US Highway 1 to 21St Street 10921441-053360-19008 RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of Amendment No. 1 to Work Order No. 1 with Atkins North America, Inc. authorizing the professional services as outlined in the Scope of Work and authorize the Chairman to execute Amendment No. 1 to Work Order No. 1 on their behalf for a Not -to -Exceed amount of $18,731.25. ' ATTACHMENT Atkins North America, Inc. Amendment No. 1 to Work Order No. 1 EXHIBIT A - SCOP 438074.1 APPROVED AGENDA ITEM FOR APRIL 20, 2021 AMENDMENT 1 TO WORK ORDER 1 6th Avenue Resurfacing US -1 to 2111 Street IRC -1638 This Amendment 1 to Work Order Number 1 is entered into as of this day of 2021, pursuant to that certain Continuing Consulting Engineering Services Agreement for Professional Services entered into as of this 17th day of April, 2018 (collectively referred to as the "Agreement"), by and between INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Florida ("COUNTY") and ATKINS NORTH AMERICA, INC. ("Consultant"). 1. The COUNTY has selected the Consultant to perform the professional services set forth in existing Work Order Number 1, Effective Date March 5, 2019. 2. The COUNTY and the Consultant desire to amend this Work Order as set forth on Exhibit A (Section 1 -Scope of Work) attached to this Amendment and made part hereof by this reference. The professional services will be performed by the Consultant for the fee schedule set forth in Exhibit A (Section 4 - Compensation), all in accordance with the terms and provisions set forth in the Agreement. 3. From and after the Effective Date of this Amendment, the above -referenced Work Order is amended as set forth in this Amendment. Pursuant to paragraph 1.4 of the Agreement, nothing contained in any Work Order shall conflict with the terms of the Agreement and the terms of the Agreement shall be deemed to be incorporated in each individual. Work Order as if fully set forth herein. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Work Order as of the date first written above. CONSULTANT: ATKINS NORTH AMERICA, INC. By: Print Name: Title: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY By: Joseph E. Flescher, Chairman BCC Approved Date: Attest: Jeffrey R. Smith, Clerk of Court and Comptroller By: Deputy Clerk Approved: Approved as to form and legal sufficiency: Jason E. Brown, County Administrator William K. DeBraal, Deputy County Attorney 29 EXHIBIT A ATKINS Proposal to Provide Professional Engineering Services for IRC Project No. 1638 - 611 Avenue Resurfacing Project US -1 to 21" Street Vero Beach, Indian River County, Florida Indian River County (County) is proposing to improve the safety and operation of 6'' Avenue from Highway US -1 to 215` Street. Approximately 3,700 LF (0.7 miles) of the road (15th Place north to 215' Street) are within the city limits of Vero Beach, FL. The proposed improvements consist of milling and resurfacing the existing asphalt pavement, filing in sidewalk gaps, and upgrading pedestrian crossings to current FDOT standards. Included.in the scope of services are survey and geotechnical services for roadway cores. The total length of roadway within the project area is approximately 10,560 LF (2.0 miles). Through Work Order 1 issued March 5''', 2019 Atkins has developed Construction Plans, Specifications and Cost Estimate for the propose improvements. This scope of work for additional services is for redesign work required by FDOT as noted below: SECTION 1 SCOPE OF SERVICES TASK 1: SURVEY UPDATE Based on FDOT comments of the 90% Plans the County provided additional information on the existing right of way location., particularly at and along the intersections of 6'' Avenue from 17"' Street north to 21St Street including the north right of way line of 21" Street. The project surveyor coordinated with the County Surveyor to obtain this information and updated the project survey. TASK 2: ROADWAY AND SIGNAL PLAN REDESIGN The original intent was that the design of proposed improvements that would require additional right of way and/or easement(s), including temporary construction easements in locations where right of way was limited for the construction of sidewalks, miscellaneous drainage improvements and construction access. Atkins coordinated with County staff on those locations and provided sketches for the County's use in contacting the landowners. Following FDOT review of the project FDOT comments required removal of this work and required all work to be done from within the existing right of way. Atkins coordinated with the IRC staff and the project surveyor on the right of location. Based on County staff direction to remove all work outside the right of way Atkins revised the construction drawings after the 90% submittal. This direction was made after receipt of county staff review comments for the 90% plans and while Atkins was finalizing the 100% construction documents for resubmittal to the county. Pagel of 2 October 19, 2020 30 EXHIBIT A ATK1iVS SECTION 2 ASSUMPTIONS AND EXCLUSIONS See original scope of services. SECTION 3 SCHEDULE & DELIVERABLES Work under this Amendment will be incorporated into the 100% Construction Documents. SECTION 4 COMPENSATION The proposed scope of services will be provided on a lump sum basis administered pursuant to the provisions of our master contract dated April 17, 2018 and invoiced monthly based on the percentage of completion of the overall project. Task 1: Survey update $ 2,651.25 Task 2: Roadway and Signal Plan Redesign $ 16,080.00 TOTAL $ 18,731.25 October 19, 2020 Page 2, of 2 31 EXHIBIT A 32 Page 1 of 1 MAN HOUR BREAKDOWN Project: BY: IRC GEC - 6th Avenue Resurfacing Redesign work JHW DATE: 10/19/2020 TASK DESCRIPTION PROGRAM MGR SR ENG III/ PM SR ENG I ENG I CAD DESIGNER Task 1 - Survey Update SUBCONTRACTED Subtotal 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Task 2 - Roadway and Signal Plan Redesign Coord w/ Surveyor & IRC re R/VV 6.0 Roadway Plan Redeisgn 8.0 12.0 12.0 24.0 Signal Plan Redesign 6.0 8.0 8.0 20.0 QAQC 4.0 1 8.0 Subtotal 4.0 28.0 20.0 20.0 44.0 TOTAL HOURS 4.0 28.0 20.0 20.0 44.0 32 Page 1 of 1 , t , INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD MEMORANDUM TO: Jason E. Brown, County Administrator THROUGH: Richard B. Szpyrka, P.E., Public Works Director THROUGH: Eric Charest, Natural ResourcesManager FROM: Molly Klinepeter,, Lagoon Plan Environmental Specialist SUBJECT: Approval of FWC Grant for Indian River County Derelict Vessel Removal Project DATE: April14, 2021 DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS The Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FWC) has awarded Indian River County a $8,150.00 Bulk Derelict Vessel Removal Grant to cover the costs associated with the removal and disposition of four (4) derelict vessels from the Indian River Lagoon within the jurisdictional boundaries of Indian River County. Officers from FWC have investigated the vessels and determined the vessels as derelict in accordance with sections 705.101 (3) and 823.11, Florida Statutes. The derelict designation from FWC allows the County to have the vessels removed and disposed of, improving boating safety and removing these hazards to navigation. CCNK LLG has been selected. as the contractor to perform the removal and disposition of the derelict vessels. FWC prepared the grant agreement (Agreement No. 20318) and forwarded it to the County for review and execution. FUNDING The cost to remove and dispose of the four (4) derelict vessels totals $8,150.00. The FWC Grant will provide the County with 100% reimbursement of the associated costs not to exceed $8,150.00. This task is budgeted for in the Florida Boating Improvement Program — Other Contractual Service Account #13321072-033490. I RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners approve attached Agreement No. 20318 in the amount of $8,150.00 and authorize the Chairman to execute it on behalf of the County. ATTACHMENTS FWC Grant Agreement No. 20318 FW C20318_G ra ntForm IRC DV Removal Maps APPROVED AGENDA ITEM FOR: April 20,2021 33 FWC Agreement No. 20318 STATE OF FLORIDA FLORIDA FISH AND WILDLIFE CONSERVATION COMMISSION AGREEMENT NO. 20318 CFDA Title(s): N/A CFDA No(s).: N/A Name of Federal Agency(s): N/A Federal Award No(s): N/A Federal Award Year(s): N/A Federal Award Name(s): N/A CSFA Title(s).: Derelict Vessel Removal Grant CSFA No(s).: 77005 State Award No(s).: 20318 State Award Year(s): 2020-2021 State Award Name(s): Indian River County Board of County Commissioners This Agreement is entered into by and between the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission, whose address is 620 South Meridian Street, Tallahassee, Florida 32399-1600, hereafter "Commission," and Indian River County BOCC, FEID # 59-6000674, whose address is 1801 27th Street, BLDG. A; Vero Beach, FL. 32960, hereinafter "Grantee." WHEREAS, the Commission and Grantee have partnered together to remove derelict vessels from the waters of the state; and, WHEREAS, Grantee has been awarded Bulk Derelict Vessel Removal Grant 20318; and, WHEREAS, such benefits are for the ultimate good of the State of Florida, its resources, wildlife, and public welfare. Now THEREFORE, the Commission and the Grantee, for the considerations hereafter set forth, agree as follows: 1. PROJECT DESCRIPTION. The Grantee shall provide the services and perform the specific responsibilities and obligations, as set forth in the Scope of Work, attached hereto as Attachment A and made a part hereof (hereafter, Scope of Work). The Scope of Work specifically identifies project tasks and accompanying deliverables. These deliverables must be submitted and approved by the Commission prior to any payment. The Commission will not accept any deliverable that does not comply with the specified required minimum level of service to be performed and the criteria for evaluating the successful completion of each deliverable. If this agreement is the result of Grantee responses to the Commission's request for competitive or other grant proposals, the Grantee's response is hereby incorporated by reference. 34 GRANT - GOVERNMENTAL ENTITY June 2019 Page 1 of 20 FWC Agreement No. 20318 2. PERFORMANCE. The Grantee shall perform the activities described in the Scope of Work in a proper and satisfactory manner. Unless otherwise provided for in the Scope of Work, any and all equipment, products or materials necessary or appropriate to perform under this Agreement shall be supplied by the Grantee. Grantee shall obtain all necessary local, state, and federal authorizations necessary to complete this project, and the Grantee shall be licensed as necessary to perform under this Agreement as may be required by law, rule, or regulation; the Grantee shall provide evidence of such compliance to the Commission upon request. The Grantee shall procure all supplies and pay all charges, fees, taxes and incidentals that may be required for the completion of this Agreement. By acceptance of this Agreement, the Grantee warrants that it has the capability in all respects to fully perform the requirements and the integrity and reliability that will assure good -faith performance as a responsible Grantee. Grantee shall immediately notify the Commission's Grant Manager in writing if its ability to perform under the Agreement is compromised in any manner during the term of the Agreement. The Commission shall take appropriate action, including potential termination of this Agreement pursuant to Paragraph eight (8) below, in the event the Grantee's ability to perform under this Agreement becomes compromised. 3. AGREEMENT PERIOD. A. Agreement Period and Commission's Limited Obligation to Pay. This Agreement is made pursuant to a grant award and shall be effective upon execution by the last Party to sign and shall remain in effect through 7/5/2021. However, as authorized by Rule 68-1.003, F.A.C., referenced grant programs may execute Agreements with a retroactive start date of no more than sixty (60) days, provided that approval is granted from the Executive Director or his/her designee and that it is in the best interest of the Commission and State to do so. For this agreement, the retroactive start date was not approved. The Commission's Grant Manager shall confirm the specific start date of the Agreement by written notice to the Grantee. The Grantee shall not be eligible for reimbursement or compensation for grant activities performed prior to the start date of this Agreement nor after the end date of the Agreement. For this agreement, pre -award costs are not eligible for reimbursement. If necessary, by mutual agreement as evidenced in writing and lawfully executed by the Parties, an Amendment to this Agreement may be executed to lengthen the Agreement period. 4. COMPENSATION AND PAYMENTS. A. Compensation. As consideration for the services rendered by the Grantee under the terms of this Agreement, the Commission shall pay the Grantee on a cost reimbursement basis in an amount not to exceed $8,150.00.. B. Payments. The Commission shall pay the Grantee for satisfactory performance of the tasks identified in Attachment A, Scope of Work, as evidenced by the completed deliverables, upon submission of invoices, accompanied by supporting documentation sufficient to justify invoiced expenses or fees, and after acceptance of services and deliverables in writing by the Commission's Grant Manager identified in Paragraph ten (10), below. Unless otherwise specified in the Scope of Work, invoices shall be due monthly, commencing from the start date of this Agreement. Invoices must be legible and must clearly reflect the Deliverables that were provided in accordance with the terms of the Agreement for the invoice period. Unless otherwise specified in the Scope of Work, a finalinvoice shall be submitted to the Commission no later than forty-five (45) days following the expiration date of this Agreement to assure the availability of funds for payment. Further, pursuant to Section 215.971(1)(d), F.S., the Commission may only reimburse the Grantee for allowable costs resulting from obligations incurred during the agreement period specified in Paragraph three (3). M GRANT - GOVERNMENTAL ENTITY June 2019 Page 2 of 20 FWC Agreement No. 20318 C. Invoices. Each invoice shall include the Commission Agreement Number and the Grantee's Federal Employer Identification (FEID) Number. Invoices, with supporting documentation, may be submitted electronically to the attention of the Commission's Grant Manager identified in Paragraph ten (10), below. If submitting hard copies, an original and two (2) copies of the invoice, plus all supporting documentation, shall be submitted. All bills for amounts due under this Agreement shall be submitted in detail sufficient for a proper pre -audit and post -audit thereof. Grantee acknowledges that the Commission's Grant .Manager shall reject invoices lacking documentation necessary to justify invoiced expenses. D. Match. Pursuant to grant program guidelines, the Grantee is not required to contribute non-federal match towards this Agreement. If applicable, details regarding specific match requirements are included in Attachment A, Scope of Work. E. Travel Expenses. If authorized in Attachment A, Scope of Work, travel expenses shall be reimbursed in accordance with Section 112.061, F.S. F. State Obligation to Pay. The State of Florida's performance and obligation to pay under this Agreement is contingent upon an annual appropriation and authorization to spend by the Legislature. The Parties hereto understand that this Agreement is not a commitment to future appropriations but is subject to appropriation and authority to spend provided by the Legislature. The Commission shall be the final authority as to the availability of funds for this Agreement, and as to what constitutes an "annual appropriation" of funds to complete this Agreement. If such funds are not appropriated or available for the Agreement purpose, such event will not constitute a default on behalf of the Commission or the State. The Commission's Grant Manager shall notify the Grantee in writing at the earliest possible time if funds are not appropriated or available. G. Non -Competitive Procurement and Rate of Payment. Section 216.3475, F.S., requires that under non-competitive procurements, a Grantee may not receive a rate of payment in excess of the competitive prevailing rate for those services unless . expressly authorized in the General Appropriations Act. If applicable, Grantee warrants, by execution of this Agreement, that the amount of non-competitive compensation provided in this Agreement is in compliance with Section 216.3475, F.S. H. Time Limits for Payment of Invoices. Payments shall be made in accordance with Sections 215.422 and 287.0585, F.S., which govern time limits for payment of invoices. Section 215.422, F.S. provides that agencies have five (5) working days to inspect and approve Deliverables, unless the Scope of Work specifies otherwise. If payment is not available within forty (40) days, measured from the latter of the date the invoice is received or the Deliverables are received, .inspected and approved, a separate interest penalty set by the Department of Financial Services pursuant to Section 55.03(1), F.S., will be due and payable in addition to the invoice amount. Invoices returned to a Grantee due to preparation errors will result in a payment delay. Invoice payment requirements do not start until a properly completed invoice is provided to the agency. I. Electronic Funds Transfer. Grantee agrees to enroll in Electronic Funds Transfer (EFT), offered by the State's Chief Financial Officer, within thirty (30) days of the date the last Party has signed this Agreement. Copies of the Authorization form and a sample blank enrollment letter can be found on the vendor instruction page at: https://www.myfloridacfo.com/Division/AA/Vendors/default.htm 36 GRANT - GOVERNMENTAL ENTITY June 2019 Page 3 of 20 FWC Agreement No. 20318 Questions should be directed to the State of Florida's EFT Section at (850) 413-5517. Once enrolled, invoice payments will be made by EFT. J. Vendor Ombudsman. A Vendor Ombudsman, whose duties include acting as an advocate for vendors who may be experiencing problems in obtaining timely payment(s) from a State agency, may be contacted at (850) 413-5516 or by calling the Chief Financial Officer's Hotline, (800) 342- 2762. 5. RETURN OR RECOUPMENT OF FUNDS. A. Overpayment to Grantee. Pursuant to Section 215.971(1)(e) &(f), F.S., the Grantee shall return to the Commission any overpayments due to unearned funds or funds disallowed pursuant to the terms of this Agreement that were disbursed to Grantee by the Commission. In the event the Grantee or its independent auditor discovers that overpayment has been made, the Grantee shall repay said overpayment within forty (40) calendar days without prior notification from the Commission. In the event the Commission first discovers an overpayment has been made, the Commission will notify the Grantee in writing. Should repayment not be made in a timely manner, the Commission shall be entitled to charge interest at the lawful rate of interest established pursuant to Section 55.03(1), F.S., on the outstanding balance beginning forty (40) calendar days after the date of notification or discovery. Refunds should be sent to the Commission's Grant Manager and made payable to the "The Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission". B. Additional Costs or Monetary Loss Resulting from Grantee Non -Compliance. If the Grantee's non-compliance with any provision of the Agreement results in additional cost or monetary loss to the Commission or the State of Florida to the extent allowed by Florida Law, the Commission can recoup that cost or loss from monies owed to the Grantee under this Agreement or any other agreement between Grantee and the Commission. In the event the discovery of this cost or loss arises when no monies are available under this Agreement or any other agreement between the Grantee and the Commission, the Grantee will repay such cost or loss in full to the Commission within thirty (30) days of the date of notice of the amount owed, unless the Commission agrees, in writing, to an alternative timeframe. If the Grantee is unable to repay any cost or loss to the Commission, the Commission shall notify the State of Florida, Department of Financial Services, for resolution pursuant to Section 17.0415, F.S. 6. COMMISSION EXEMPT FROM TAXES, PROPERTY EXEMPT FROM LIEN. A. Commission Exempt from Taxes. The Grantee recognizes that the State of Florida, by virtue of its sovereignty, is not required to pay any taxes on the services or goods purchased under the terms of this Agreement. Grantee is placed on notice that this exemption generally does not apply to nongovernmental entity recipients, subrecipients, contractors, or subcontractors. Any questions regarding this tax exemption should be addressed to the Commission Grant Manager. B. Property Exempt from Lien. If the Grant involves the improvement of real property titled to the State of Florida, then the following paragraph applies: The Grantee acknowledges that Property being improved is titled to the State of Florida and is not subject to lien of any kind for any reason. The Grantee shall include notice of such exemptions in any subcontracts and purchase orders issued hereunder. 37 GRANT - GOVERNMENTAL ENTITY June 2019 Page 4 of 20 FWC Agreement No. 20318 7. MONITORING. The Commission's Grant Manager shall actively monitor the Grantee's performance and compliance with the terms of this Agreement. The Commission reserves the right for any Commission staff to make scheduled or unscheduled, announced or unannounced monitoring visits. Specific State and Federal monitoring terms and conditions are found in Attachment B, Audit Requirements. Additionally, monitoring terms, conditions, and schedules may be included in Attachment A, Scope of Work. 8. TERMINATION. A. Commission Termination. The Commission may unilaterally terminate this Agreement for convenience by providing the Grantee with thirty (30) calendar days of written notice of its intent to terminate. The Grantee shall not be entitled to recover any cancellation charges or lost profits. The Grantee may request termination of the Agreement for convenience. B. Termination — Fraud or Willful Misconduct. This Agreement shall terminate immediately in the event of fraud or willful misconduct. In the event of such termination, the Commission shall provide the Grantee with written notice of termination. C. Termination — Other. The Commission may terminate this Agreement if the Grantee fails to: 1.) comply with all terms and conditions of this Agreement; 2.) produce each deliverable within the time specified by the Agreement or extension; 3.) maintain adequate progress, thus endangering the performance of the Agreement; or, 4.) abide by any statutory, regulatory, or licensing requirement. Rule 60A-1.006(3), F.A.C., governs the procedure and consequences for default. The rights and remedies of the Commission in this clause are in addition to any other rights and remedies provided by law or under the Agreement. The Grantee shall not be entitled to recover any cancellation charges or lost profits. D. Termination - Funds Unavailability. In the event funds to finance this Agreement become unavailable or if federal or state funds upon which this Agreement is dependent are withdrawn or redirected, the Commission may terminate this Agreement upon no less than twenty-four (24) hours' notice in writing to the Grantee. Said notice shall be delivered by certified mail, return receipt requested or in person with proof of delivery. The Commission shall be the final authority as to the availability of funds and will not reallocate funds appropriated for this Agreement to another program thus causing "lack of funds." In the event of termination of this Agreement under this provision, the Grantee will be compensated for any work satisfactorily completed and any non - cancellable obligations properly incurred prior to notification of termination. E. Grantee Discontinuation of Activities upon Termination Notice. Upon receipt of notice of termination, the Grantee shall, unless the notice directs otherwise, immediately discontinue all activities authorized hereunder. Upon termination of this Agreement, the Grantee shall promptly render to the Commission all property belonging to the Commission. For the purposes of this section, property belonging to the Commission shall include, but shall not be limited to, all books and records kept on behalf of the Commission. 9. REMEDIES. A. Financial Consequences. In accordance with Sections 215.971(l)(a) &(b), F.S., Attachment A, Scope of Work, contains clearly established tasks in quantifiable units of deliverables that must be 38 GRANT - GOVERNMENTAL ENTITY June 2019 Page 5 of 20 11. 12. 10. FWC Agreement No. 20318 received and accepted in writing by the agency before payment. Each deliverable specifies the required minimum level of service to be performed and the criteria for evaluating the successful completion of each deliverable. If the Grantee fails to produce each deliverable within the time frame specified by the Scope of Work, the budget amount allocated for that deliverable will be deducted from the Grantee's payment. In addition, pursuant to Section 215.971(1)(c), the Commission shall apply any additional financial consequences, identified in the Scope of Work. B. Cumulative Remedies. The rights and remedies of the Commission in this paragraph are in addition to any other rights and remedies provided by law or under the Agreement. NOTICES AND CORRESPONDENCE. Any and all notices shall be delivered to the individuals identified below. In the event that either Party designates a different Grant Manager after the execution of this Agreement, the Party will provide written notice of the name, address, zip code, telephone and fax numbers, and email address of the newest Grant Manager, or an individual authorized to receive notice on behalf of that Party, to all other Parties as soon as possible, but not later than five (5) business days after the new Grant Manager has been named. A designation of a new Grant Manager shall not require a formal amendment to the Agreement. FOR THE COMMISSION: Grant Manager Phil Horning Derelict Vessel Program Administrator Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission 620 S. Meridian Street, Room 235I Tallahassee, Florida 32399 (850) 617-9540 Direct (850) 488-9284 Fax Phil.Horning@MyFWC.com AMENDMENT. FOR THE GRANTEE: Grant Manager Molly �K1mepet r Lagoon Plan Environmental Speciali Indian River County BOCC 1801 27th Street, BLDG. A Vero Beach, FL. 32960 772-226-1651; 772-778-9391L__^ Inklinepeter@ircgov.com A. Waiver or Modification. No waiver or modification of this Agreement or of any covenant, condition, or limitation herein contained shall be valid unless in writing and lawfully executed by the Parties. B. Change Orders. The Commission may, at any time, by written order, make a change to this Agreement. Such changes are subject to the mutual agreement of both Parties as evidenced in writing. Any change which causes an increase or decrease in the Grantee's cost or time shall require an Amendment. Minor changes, such as those updating a Party's contact information, may be accomplished by a Modification. C. Renegotiation upon Change in Law or Regulation. The Parties agree to renegotiate this Agreement if federal and/or state revisions of any applicable laws or regulations make changes in the Agreement necessary. PROPERTY RIGHTS. If this Agreement includes Federal funds, the provisions of Sections 200.310-200.316, OMB Uniform Guidance (2 CFR 200), and any language addressing Federal rights, apply. A. Intellectual and Other Intangible Property. GRANT - GOVERNMENTAL ENTITY June 2019 39 Page 6 of 20 FWC Agreement No. 20318 i. Grantee's Preexisting Intellectual Property (Proprietary) Rights. Unless specifically addressed in the Attachment A, Scope of Work, intellectual and other intangible property rights to the Grantee's preexisting property will remain with the Grantee. ii. Proceeds Related to Intellectual Property Rights. Proceeds derived from the sale, licensing, marketing or other authorization related to any intellectual and other intangible property right created or otherwise developed by the Grantee under this Agreement for the Commission shall be handled in the manner specified by the applicable Florida State Statute and/or Federal program requirements. iii. Commission Intellectual Property Rights. Where activities supported by this Agreement produce original writing, sound recordings, pictorial reproductions, drawings or other graphic representations and works of any similar nature, the Commission and the State of Florida have the unlimited, royalty -free, nonexclusive, irrevocable right to use, duplicate and disclose such materials in whole or in part, in any manner, for any purpose whatsoever and to have others acting on behalf of the Commission to do so. If this Agreement is supported by federal funds, the federal awarding agency reserves a royalty -free, nonexclusive and irrevocable right to reproduce, publish, or otherwise use the work for federal purposes, and to authorize others to do so. B. Purchase or Improvement of Real Property This agreement is not for the purchase_or improvement of real property, therefore, th_ e following terms and conditions do not apply.: i. Federal Funds. Any Federal funds provided for the purchase of or improvements to real property are subject to the Property Standards of Sections 200.310 - 200.316, and 200.329, OMB Uniform Guidance (2 CFR 200), as amended. ii. Title. If this agreement is supported by state funds, the Grantee shall comply with Section 287.05805, F. S. This section requires the Grantee to grant a security interest in the property to the State of Florida, the type and details of which are provided for in Attachment A, Scope of Work. Title to state-owned real property remains vested in the state. Title to federally -owned real property remains vested in the Federal government in accordance with the provisions of Section 200.312, OMB Uniform Guidance (2 CFR 200), as amended. iii. Use. Federally -owned real property will be used for the originally authorized purpose as long as needed for that purpose in accordance with Section 200.311, OMB Uniform Guidance (2 CFR 200). State-owned real property will be used as provided in Attachment A, Scope of Work. C. Non -Expendable Property. The following provisions apply to the extent that the grant allows the acquisition of non -expendable property. i. Non -Expendable Property Defined. For the requirements of this section of the Agreement, "non -expendable property" is the same as "property" as defined in Section 273.02, F.S. (equipment, fixtures, and other tangible personal property of a non- consumable and non -expendable nature, with a value or cost of $1,000.00 or more, and a normal expected life of one (1) year or more; hardback -covered bound books that are circulated to students or the general public, with a value or cost of $25.00 or more; and uncirculated hardback -covered bound books, with a value or cost of $250.00 or more). 40 GRANT - GOVERNMENTAL ENTITY June 2019 Page 7 of 20 FWC Agreement No. 20318 ii. Title to Non -Expendable Property. Title (ownership) to all non -expendable property acquired with funds from this Agreement shall be vested in the Commission and said property shall be transferred to the Commission upon completion or termination of the Agreement unless otherwise authorized in writing by the Commission or unless otherwise specifically provided for in Attachment A, Scope of Work. D. Equipment and Supplies. The following provisions apply to the extent that the grant allows the acquisition of equipment and supplies. Title - Equipment. Title to equipment acquired under a Federal award will vest upon acquisition in the non -Federal entity in accordance with Sections 200.313 and 200.314, OMB Uniform Guidance (2 CFR 200). ii. Title — Supplies. Title to supplies will vest in the non -Federal entity upon acquisition. Unused supplies exceeding $5,000.00 in total aggregate value upon termination or completion of the project or program are subject to Section 200.314, OMB Uniform Guidance. iii. . Use — Equipment. Equipment must be used by the non -Federal entity in the program or project for which it was acquired as long as needed 13. RELATIONSHIP OF THE PARTIES. A. Independent Grantee. The Grantee shall perform as an independent grantee and not as an agent, representative, or employee of the Commission. The Grantee covenants that it presently has no interest and shall not acquire any interest that would conflict in any manner or degree with the performance of services required. Each Party hereto covenants that there is no conflict of interest or any other prohibited relationship between the Grantee and the Commission. B. Grantee Training and Qualifications. Grantee agrees that all Grantee employees, subcontractors, or agents performing work under the Agreement shall be properly trained technicians who meet or exceed any specified training qualifications. Upon request, Grantee shall furnish a copy of technical certification or other proof of qualification. C. Commission Security. All employees, subcontractors, or agents performing work under the Agreement must comply with all security and administrative requirements of the Commission. The Commission may conduct, and the Grantee shall cooperate in, a security background check or otherwise assess any employee, subcontractor, or agent furnished by the Grantee. The Commission may refuse access to, or require replacement of, any personnel for cause, including, but not limited to, technical or training qualifications, quality of work, change in security status, or non-compliance with the Commission's other requirements. Such refusal shall not relieve Grantee of its obligation to perform all work in compliance with the Agreement. The Commission, in coordination with the Grantee, may reject and bar from any facility for cause any of Grantee's employees, subcontractors, or agents. D. Commission Rights to Assign or Transfer. The Grantee agrees that the State of Florida shall at all times be entitled to assign or transfer its rights, duties, or obligations under this Agreement to another governmental agency in the State of Florida, upon giving prior written notice to the Grantee. 41 GRANT - GOVERNMENTAL ENTITY June 2019 Page 8 of 20 FWC Agreement No. 20318 E. Commission Rights to Undertake and Award Supplemental Agreements. Grantee agrees that the Commission may undertake or award supplemental agreements for work related to the Agreement. The Grantee and its subcontractors shall cooperate with such other Grantees and the Commission in all such cases. 14. SUBCONTRACTS. Grantee is permitted to subcontract work under this Agreement, therefore the following terms conditions apply. A. Authority. The Grantee shall ensure, and provide assurances to the Commission upon request, that any subcontractor selected for work under this Agreement has the necessary qualifications and abilities to perform in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement. The Grantee must provide the Commission with the names of any subcontractor considered for work under this Agreement; the Commission in coordination with the Grantee reserves the right to reject any subcontractor. The Grantee agrees to be responsible for all work performed and all expenses incurred with the project. Any subcontract arrangements must be evidenced by a written document available to the Commission upon request. The Grantee further agrees that the Commission shall not be liable to the extent allowed by law, to any subcontractor for. any expenses or liabilities incurred under the subcontract and the Grantee shall be solely liable to the subcontractor for all expenses and liabilities incurred under the subcontract. B. Grantee Payments to Subcontractor. If subcontracting is permitted pursuant to Paragraph A, above, Grantee agrees to make payments to the subcontractor upon completion of work and submitted invoice in accordance with the contract between the Grantee and subcontractor. Failure to make payment pursuant to any subcontract will result in a penalty charged against Grantee and paid to the subcontractor in the amount of one-half of one percent (0.50%) of the amount due per day from the expiration of the period allowed herein for payment. Such penalty shall be in addition to actual payments owed and shall not exceed fifteen percent (15%) of the outstanding balance due. C. Commission Right to Reject Subcontractor Employees. The Commission in coordination with Grantee shall .retain the right to reject any of the Grantee's or subcontractor's employees whose qualifications or performance, in the Commission's judgment, are insufficient. D. Subcontractor as Independent Contractor. If subcontracting is permitted pursuant to Paragraph A above, the Grantee agrees to take such actions as may be necessary to ensure that each subcontractor will be deemed to be an independent contractor and will not be considered or permitted to be an agent, servant, joint venture, or partner of the State of Florida. 15. . MANDATORY DISCLOSURE. These disclosures are required by State law, as indicated, and apply when this Agreement includes State funding; and by Federal law, as indicated, and apply when the Agreement includes a Federal award. A. Disclosure of Interested State Employees and Conflict of Interest. This Agreement is subject to Chapter 112, F.S. Grantee shall provide the naive of any officer, director, employee, or other agent who is affiliated with this project and an employee of the State of Florida. If the Agreement includes a Federal award, then the Agreement is also subject to Section 200.112, OMB Uniform Guidance (2 CFR 200). Grantee must disclose, in writing, any potential conflict of interest to the Commission in accordance with applicable Federal awarding agency policy. B. Convicted Vendors. Grantee hereby certifies that neither it, nor any person or affiliate of Grantee, has been convicted of a Public Entity Crime as defined in section 287.133, F.S., nor placed on the 42 GRANT - GOVERNMENTAL ENTITY June 2019 Page 9 of 20 FWC Agreement No. 20318 convicted vendor list. Grantee shall have a continuing obligation to disclose, to the Commission, in writing, if it, its principals, recipient, subrecipient, contractor, or subcontractor, are on the convicted vendors list maintained by the Florida Department of Management Services pursuant to Section 287.133(3)(d), F.S. i. Convicted Vendor List. Pursuant to Subsection 287.133(2)(a), F.S., a person or affiliate who has been placed on the convicted vendor list following a conviction for a public entity crime may not be awarded or perform work as a Grantee, supplier, subcontractor or consultant under a contract with any public entity and may not transact business with any public entity in excess of the threshold amount provided in Section 287.017, F.S., for Category Two for a period of thirty-six (36) months from the date of being placed on the convicted vendor list. The State of Florida, Department of Management Services, Division of State Purchasing provides listings for convicted, suspended, discriminatory and federal excluded parties, as well as the vendor complaint list at: http://www.dms.mvflorida.com/business operations/state purchasin vendor information/co nvicted suspended discriminatory complaints vendor lists ii. Notice of Conviction of Public Entity Crime. Any person must notify the Department of Management Services and the Commission, in writing, within thirty (30) days after conviction of a public entity crime applicable to that person or an affiliate of that person as defined in Section 287.133, F.S. C. Vendors on Scrutinized Companies List. Scrutinized Companies. Grantee certifies that it and any of its affiliates are not scrutinized companies as identified in Section 287.1.35, F.S. In addition, Grantee agrees to observe the requirements of Section 287.135, F.S., for applicable sub -agreements entered into for the performance of work under this Agreement. Pursuant to Section 287.135, F.S., the Commission may immediately terminate this Agreement for cause if the Grantee, its affiliates, or its subcontractors are found to have submitted a false certification; or if the Grantee, its affiliates, or its subcontractors are placed on any applicable scrutinized companies list or engaged in prohibited contracting activity during the term of the Agreement. As provided in Subsection 287.135(8), F.S., if federal law ceases to authorize these contracting prohibitions then they shall become inoperative. D. Discriminatory Vendors. Grantee shall disclose to the Commission, in writing, if they, their subrecipient, contractor, or subcontractor, are on the Discriminatory Vendor List maintained by the Florida Department of Management Services pursuant to Section 287.134(3)(d), F.S. "An entity or affiliate who has been placed on the discriminatory vendor list may not submit a bid, proposal, or reply on a contract to provide any goods or services to a public entity; may not submit a bid, proposal, or reply on a contract with a public entity for the construction or repair of a public building or public work; may not submit bids, proposals, or replies on leases of real property to a public entity; may not be awarded or perform work as a contractor, supplier, subcontractor, or consultant under a contract with any public entity; and may not transact business with any public entity." Section 287.134(2)(a), F.S. Grantee has a continuing duty to disclose to the Commission whether they appear on the discriminatory vendor list. E. Prompt Disclosure of Litigation, Investigations, Arbitration, or Administrative Proceedings. Throughout the term of the Agreement, the Grantee has a continuing duty to promptly disclose to the Commission's Grant Manager, in writing, upon occurrence, all civil or criminal litigation, 43 GRANT - GOVERNMENTAL ENTITY June 2019 Page 10 of 20 FWC Agreement No. 20318 investigations, arbitration, or administrative proceedings (Proceedings) relating to or affecting the Grantee's ability to perform under this agreement. If the existence of such Proceeding causes the Commission concern that the Grantee's ability or willingness to perform the Agreement is jeopardized, the Grantee may be required to provide the Commission with reasonable assurances to demonstrate that: a.) the Grantee will be able to perform the Agreement in accordance with its terms and conditions; and, b.) Grantee and/or its employees or agents have not and will not engage in conduct in performing services for the Commission which is similar in nature to the conduct. alleged in such Proceeding. F. Certain Violations of Federal Criminal Law. If this agreement includes a Federal award, then in accordance with Section 200.113, OMB Uniform Guidance (2 CFR 200), Grantee must disclose, in a timely manner, in writing to the Commission all violations of Federal criminal law involving fraud, bribery, or gratuity violations potentially affecting the Federal award. 16. INSURANCE. The Grantee warrants and represents that it is insured, or self-insured for liability insurance, in accordance with applicable state law and that such insurance or self-insurance offers protection applicable to the Grantee's officers, employees, servants and agents while acting within the scope of their employment with the Grantee. 17. SPONSORSHIP. As required by Section 286.25, F.S., if any recipient, subrecipient, contractor or subcontractor under this grant is a nongovernmental organization which sponsors a program financed wholly or in part by state funds, including any funds obtained through this Agreement, it shall, in publicizing, advertising, or describing the sponsorship of the program, state: "Sponsored by (Grantee's name) and the State of Florida, Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission." If the sponsorship reference is in written material, the words "State of Florida, Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission" shall appear in the same size letters or type as the name of the Grantee's organization. Additional sponsorship requirements may be specified in Attachment A, Scope of Work. 18. PUBLIC RECORDS. A. All records in conjunction with this Grant shall be public records and shall be treated in the same manner as other public records that are under Chapter 119, F.S. B. This Agreement may be unilaterally canceled by the Commission for refusal by the Grantee to allow public access to all documents, papers, letters, or other material subject to the provisions of Chapter 119, F.S., and made or received by the Grantee in conjunction with this Agreement, unless exemption for such records is allowable under Florida law. C. If the Grantee meets the definition of "Contractor" in Section 119.0701(1)(a) F.S., the Grantee shall comply with the following: IF THE CONTRACTOR HAS QUESTIONS REGARDING THE APPLICATION OF THE CHAPTER 119, FLORIDA STATUES, TO THE CONTRACTOR'S DUTY TO PROVIDE PUBLIC RECORDS RELATING TO THIS CONTRACT, CONTACT THE CUSTODIAN OF PUBLIC RECORDS AT: 44 GRANT - GOVERNMENTAL ENTITY June 2019 Page 11 of 20 FWC Agreement No. 20318 850-488-6553, RecordsCustodian(a,myfwc.com, and 620 South Meridian Street, Tallahassee FL 32399 ii. Keep and maintain public records required by the Commission to perform the service. iii. Upon request from the Commission's custodian of public records, provide the Commission with a copy of the requested records or allow the records to be inspected or copied within a reasonable time at a cost that does not exceed the cost provided in Chapter 119, F. S. or as otherwise provided by law. iv. Ensure that public records that are exempt or confidential and exempt from public records disclosure requirements are not disclosed except as authorized by law for the duration of the contract term and following completion of the contract if the Contractor does not transfer the records to the Commission. V. Upon completion of the contract transfer, at no cost, to the Commission all public records in possession of the Contractor or keep and maintain public records required by the Commission to perform the service. If the Contractor transfers all public records to the Commission upon completion of the contract, the Contractor shall destroy any duplicate public records that are exempt or confidential and exempt from public records disclosure requirements. If the Contractor keeps and maintains public records upon completion of the contract, the Contractor shall meet all applicable requirements for retaining public records. All records stored electronically must be provided to the Commission, upon request from the Commission's custodian of public records, in a format that is compatible with the information technology systems of the Commission. 19. COOPERATION WITH INSPECTOR GENERAL.. Pursuant to subsection 20.055(5), F.S., Grantee, and any subcontractor to the Grantee, understand and will comply with their duty to cooperate with the Inspector General in any investigation, audit, inspection, review, or hearing. Upon request of the Inspector General or any other authorized State official, the Grantee shall provide any type of information the Inspector General deems relevant to the Grantee's integrity or responsibility. Such information may include, but shall not be limited to, the Grantee's business or financial records, documents, or files of any type or form that refer to or relate to the Agreement. The Grantee agrees to reimburse the State for the reasonable costs of investigation incurred by the Inspector General or other authorized State official for investigations of the Grantee's compliance with the terms of this or any other agreement between the Grantee and the State which results in the suspension or debarment of the Grantee. Such costs shall include but shall not be limited to: salaries of investigators, including overtime; travel and lodging expenses; and expert witness and documentary fees. 20. SECURITY AND CONFIDENTIALITY. The Grantee shall not divulge to third parties any clearly marked confidential information obtained by the Grantee or its agents, distributors, resellers, subcontractors, officers or employees in the course of performing Grant work. To ensure confidentiality, the Grantee shall take appropriate steps regarding its personnel, agents, and subcontractors. The warranties of this paragraph shall survive the Grant. 21. RECORD KEEPING REQUIREMENTS. A. Grantee Responsibilities. The Grantee shall maintain accurate books, records, documents and other evidence that sufficiently and properly reflect all direct and indirect costs of any nature expended in the performance of this Agreement, in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. B. State Access to Grantee Books, Documents, Papers, and Records. The Grantee shall allow the Commission, the Chief Financial Officer of the State of Florida, the Auditor General of the State of 45 GRANT - GOVERNMENTAL ENTITY June 2019 Page 12 of 20 FWC Agreement No. 20318 Florida, the Florida Office of Program Policy Analysis and Government Accountability or authorized representatives of the state or federal government to have access to any of the Grantee's books, documents, papers, and records, including electronic storage media, as they may relate to this Agreement, for the purposes of conducting audits or examinations or making excerpts or transcriptions. C. Grantee Records Retention. Unless otherwise specified in the Scope of Work, these records shall be maintained for five (5) fiscal years following the close of this Agreement, or the period required for this particular type of project by the General Records Schedules maintained by the Florida Department of State (available at: http://dos.myflorida.com/library-archives/records- management/general-records-scheduleso, whichever is longer. Grantee shall cooperate with the Commission to facilitate the duplication and transfer of such records upon the Commission's request. D. Grantee Responsibility to Include Records Requirements — Subcontractors. In the event any work is subcontracted under this Agreement, the Grantee shall include the aforementioned audit and record keeping requirements in all subsequent contracts. E. Compliance with Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency. Any federal funds awarded under this Agreement must comply with the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA) of 2006. The intent of the FFATA is to empower every American with the ability to hold the government accountable for each spending decision. The result is to reduce wasteful spending in the government. The FFATA legislation requires that information on federal awards (federal financial assistance and expenditures) be made available to the public via a single, searchable website: http://www.USASpending.gov. Grant recipients awarded a new Federal grant greater than or equal to $25,000.00 awarded on or after October 1, 2010 are subject to the FFATA. The Grantee agrees to provide the information necessary, over the life of this Agreement, for the Commission to comply with this requirement. 22. FEDERAL AND FLORIDA SINGLE AUDIT ACT REQUIREMENTS. Pursuant to the FSAA (or Federal) Vendor / Recipient Determination Checklist, the Grantee has been determined to be a recipient of state financial assistance and/or a subrecipient of a federal award. Therefore, pursuant to Section 215.97, F.S. and/or OMB Uniform Guidance (2 CFR 200), the Grantee may be subject to the audit requirements of the Florida and/or Federal Single Audit Acts. If applicable, the Grantee shall comply with the audit requirements outlined in Attachment B, "Requirements of the Federal and Florida Single Audit Acts," attached hereto and made a part of the Agreement, as applicable. 23. FEDERAL COMPLIANCE. As applicable, Grantee shall comply with all federal laws, rules, and regulations, including but not limited to: i. Clean Air Act and Water Pollution Control Act. All applicable standards, orders, or requirements issued under the Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. 7401-7671q), and the Water Pollution Control Act (33 U.S.C. 1251-1387, as amended). ii. Lacey Act, 16 U.S.0 3371-3378. This Act prohibits trade in wildlife, fish and plants that have been illegally taken, possessed, transported or sold. iii. Magnuson -Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act, 16 U.S.C. 1801-1884. This Act governs marine fisheries in Federal waters. iv. Migratory Bird Treaty Act, 16 U.S.C. 703-712. The Act prohibits anyone, unless permitted, to pursue, hunt, take, capture, kill, attempt to take, capture or kill, possess, offer for sale, sell, offer to purchase, deliver for shipment, ship, cause to be shipped, deliver for 46 GRANT - GOVERNMENTAL ENTITY June 2019 Page 13 of 20 FWC Agreement No. 20318 transportation, transport, cause to be transported, carry or cause to be carried by any means whatsoever, receive for shipment, transport of carriage, or export, at any time, or in any manner, any migratory bird, or any part, nest, or egg of such bird. V. Endangered Species Act, 16 U.S.C. 1531, et seq. The Act provides a program for the conservation of threatened and endangered plants and animals and the habitat in which they are found. The Act also prohibits any action that cause a "taking" of any listed species of endangered fish or wildlife. Also, generally prohibited are the import, export, interstate, and foreign commerce of listed species. 24. FEDERAL FUNDS. !No Federal Funds are applied to this Agreement, therefore, the following terms; land conditions do not apply! A. Prior Approval to Expend Federal Funds to Federal Agency or Employee. It is understood and agreed that the Grantee is not authorized to expend any federal funds under this Contract to a federal agency or employee without the prior written approval of the awarding federal agency. B. Equal Employment Opportunity. Executive Order 11246 of September 24, 1965, entitled "Equal Employment Opportunity," as amended by Executive Order 11375 of October 13, 1967, and as supplemented in Department of Labor regulations (41 CFR Chapter 60). Applicable, except as otherwise provide under 41 CFR Part 60, to any grant, contract, loan, insurance, or guarantee involving Federal assisted construction. C. Davis -Bacon Act. The Davis -Bacon Act, 40 U.S.C. 3141-3148, as supplemented by Department of Labor regulations at 29 CFR Part 5. Applicable to contractors and subcontractors performing on federally funded or assisted contracts in excess of $2,000.00 for the construction, alteration, or repair (including painting and decorating) of public buildings or public works. Under this Act, contractors and subcontractors must pay their laborers and mechanics employed under the contract no less than the locally prevailing wages and fringe benefits for corresponding work on similar projects in the area. D. Copeland "Anti -Kickback Act. The Copeland "Anti -Kickback" Act, 40 U.S.C. 3141-3148, and 3146-3148, as supplemented by Department of Labor regulations (29 CFR Part 5). Applicable to contracts awarded by a non -Federal entity in excess of $100,000.00 that involve employment of mechanics or labors. Under this Act, contractors and subrecipients are prohibited from inducing, by any mean, any person employed in the construction; completion, or repair of public work, to give up any part of the compensation to which he or she is otherwise entitled. E. Contract Work Hours and Safety Standards Act. Sections 103 and 107 of the Agreement Work Hours and Safety Standards Act (40 U.S.C. 327-330) as supplemented by Department of Labor regulations (29 CFR part 5). Applicable to construction contracts awarded by Contractors and subcontractors in excess of $2,000.00, and in excess of $2,500:00 for other contracts which involve the employment of mechanics or laborers. Under this Act, contractors and subcontractors must compute wages of mechanics and laborers (workers) on the basis of a standard forty (40) hour work week; provide workers no less than time and a half for hours worked in excess of the forty (40) hour work week; and not require workers to work in surroundings or work conditions that are unsanitary, hazardous, or dangerous. F. Rights to Inventions Made Under a Contract or Agreement. 37 CFR Part 401. If the Federal award meets the definition of "funding agreement" under 37 CFR 401.2(a) and the recipient or Subrecipient wishes to enter into a contract with a small business firm ornonprofit organization regarding the substitution of parties, assignment or performance of experimental, developmental, or research work under the "funding agreement," the recipient or subrecipient must comply with the requirements of 37 47 GRANT - GOVERNMENTAL ENTITY June 2019 Page 14 of 20 FWC Agreement No. 20318 CFR Part 401, "Rights to Inventions Made by Nonprofit Organizations and Small Business Firms Under Government Grants, Contracts and Cooperative Agreements," and any implementing regulations issued by the awarding agency. G. Energy Efficiency. Mandatory standards and policies relating to energy efficiency which are contained in the State energy conservation plan issued in compliance with the Energy Policy and Conservation Act (Pub. L. 94-163, 89 Stat. 871). H. Debarment and Suspension Contractor Federal Certification. In accordance with Federal Executive Order 12549 and 2 CFR Part 1400 regarding Debarment and Suspension, the Grantee certifies that neither it, nor its principals, is presently debarred, suspended, proposed for debarment, declared ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from participation in this transaction by any federal department or agency; and, that the Grantee shall not knowingly enter into any lower tier_ contract, or other covered transaction, with a person who is similarly debarred or suspended from participating in this covered transaction. I. Prohibition against Lobbying. Grantee Certification — Payments to Influence. The Grantee certifies that no Federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid, on or after December 22, 1989, by or on behalf of the Grantee, to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of an agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress, in connection with the awarding, renewal, amending or modifying of any Federal contract, grant, or cooperative agreement. The Grantee also certifies that they have not engaged any registrant under the Lobbying Disclosure Act of 1995 who has made lobbying contacts on behalf of the Grantee with respect to this Contract and its related federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement; or, if the Grantee has engaged any registrant with respect to this Contract and its related Federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement, the Grantee shall, prior to or upon execution of this Contract, provide the Commission Contract Manager a signed declaration listing the name of any said registrant. During the term of this Contract, and at the end of each Calendar quarter in which any event occurs that materially affects the accuracy of this certification or declaration, the Grantee shall file an updated declaration with the Commission's Contract Manager. If any non-federal funds are used for lobbying activities as described above in connection with this Contract, the Grantee shall submit Standard Form -LLL, "Disclosure Form to Report Lobbying", and shall file quarterly updates of any material changes. The Grantee shall require the language of this certification to be included in all subcontracts, and all subcontractors shall certify and disclose accordingly. ii. Grantee — Refrain from Subcontracting with Certain Organizations. Pursuant to the Lobbying Disclosure Act of 1995, the Grantee agrees to refrain from entering into any subcontracts under this Contract with any organization described in Section 501(c)(4) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, unless such organization warrants that it does not, and will not, engage in lobbying activities prohibited by the Act as a special condition of the subcontract. J. Compliance with Office of Management and Budget Circulars. As applicable, Grantee shall comply with the following Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Uniform Guidance (2 CFR 200). 48 GRANT - GOVERNMENTAL ENTITY June 2019 Page 15 of 20 FWC Agreement No. 20318 K. Drug Free Workplace. Pursuant to the Drug -Free Workplace Act of 1988, the Grantee attests and certifies that the Grantee will provide a drug-free workplace compliant with 41 U.S.C. 81. 25. CONTRACT -RELATED PROCUREMENT. A. PRIDE. In accordance with Section 946.515(6), F.S., if a product or service required for the performance of this Contract is certified by or is available from Prison Rehabilitative Industries and Diversified Enterprises, Inc. (PRIDE) and has been approved in accordance with Subsection 946.515(2), F.S., the following statement applies: It is expressly understood and agreed that any articles which are the subject of, .or required to carry out, this contract shall be purchased from [PRIDE] in the same manner and under the same procedures set forth in Subsections 946.515(2) and (4), F.S.; and for purposes of this contract the person, firm or other business entity carrying out the provisions of this contract shall be deemed to be substituted for this agency insofar as dealings with such corporation are concerned. The above clause is not applicable to subcontractors unless otherwise required by law. Additional information about PRIDE and the products it offers is available at http://www.pride-enterprises.org. B. Respect of Florida. In accordance with Subsection 413.036(3), F.S., if a product or service required for the performance of this Contract is on the procurement list established pursuant to Subsection 413.035(2), F.S., the following statement applies: It is expressly understood and agreed that any articles that are the subject of, or required to carry out, this contract shall be purchased from a nonprofit agency for the blind or for the severely handicapped that is qualified pursuant to Chapter 413, F.S., in the same manner and under the same procedures set forth in Subsections 413.036(1) and (2), F.S.; and for purposes of this contract, the person, firm or other business entity carrying out the provisions of this contract shall be deemed to be substituted for the state agency insofar as dealings with such qualified nonprofit agency are concerned. Additional information about the designated nonprofit agency and the products it offers is available at http://www.respectofflorida.org. C. Procurement of Recycled Products or Materials. Grantee agrees to procure any recycled products :or materials which are the subject of or are required to carry out this Contract in accordance with Section 403.7065, F.S.; 26. PROFESSIONAL SERVICES. A. Architectural, Engineering, Landscape Architectural, or Survey and Mapping. If this Agreement is for the acquisition of professional architectural, engineering, landscape architectural, or registered surveying and mapping services, and is therefore subject to Section 287.055, F.S., the following provision applies: The architect (or registered surveyor and mapper or professional engineer, as applicable) warrants that he or she has not employed or retained any company or person, other than a bona fide employee working solely for the architect (or 49 GRANT - GOVERNMENTAL ENTITY June 2019 Page 16 of 20 FWC Agreement No. 20318 registered surveyor and mapper, or professional engineer, as applicable) to solicit or secure this Agreement and that he or she has not paid or agreed to pay any person, company, corporation, individual, or firm, other than a bona fide employee working solely for the architect (or registered surveyor and mapper or professional engineer, as applicable) any fee, commission, percentage, gift, or other consideration contingent uponor resulting from the award or making of this contract. B. Termination for Breach. For the breach or violation of this provision, the Commission shall have the right to terminate the Agreement without liability and, at its discretion, to deduct from the Agreement price, or otherwise recover, the full amount of such fee, commission, percentage, gift, or consideration. 27. INDEMNIFICATION. If Grantee is a state agency or subdivision, as defined in Subsection 768.28(2), F.S., pursuant to Subsection 768.28(19), F.S., neither Party indemnifies nor insures the other Party for the other Party's negligence. If Grantee is not a state agency or subdivision as defined above, Grantee shall be fully liable for the actions of its agents, employees, partners, or subcontractors and shall fully indemnify, defend, and hold harmless the State and the Commission, and their officers, agents, and employees, from suits, actions, damages, and costs of every name and description, including attorneys' fees, arising from or relating to personal injury and damage to real or personal tangible property alleged to be caused in whole or in part by Grantee, its agents, employees, partners, or subcontractors, provided, however, that Grantee shall not indemnify for that portion of any loss or damages proximately caused by the negligent act or omission of the State or the Commission. If this is a Professional Services Agreement as defined in Subsection 725.08 F.S., then notwithstanding the provisions of Subsection 725.06 F.S., the design professional shall only be liable for, and fully indemnify, defend, and hold harmless the State, the Commission, and their officers, agents, and employees, for actions caused in whole or in part, .by the negligence, recklessness, or intentionally wrongful conduct of the design professional and other persons employed or utilized by the design professional in the performance of the Agreement. 28. NON-DISCRIMINATION. No person, on the grounds of race, creed, color, national origin, age, sex, or disability, shall be excluded from participation in, be denied the proceeds or benefits of, or be otherwise subjected to discrimination in performance of this Agreement. 29. SEVERABILITY, CHOICE OF LAW, AND CHOICE OF VENUE. This Agreement has been delivered in the State of Florida and shall be construed in accordance with the laws of Florida. Wherever possible, each provision of this Agreement shall be interpreted in such manner as to be effective and valid under applicable law, but if any provision of this Agreement shall be prohibited or invalid under applicable law, such provision shall be ineffective to the extent of such prohibition or invalidity, without invalidating the remainder of such provision or the remaining provisions of this Agreement. Any action in connection herewith, in law or equity, shall be brought in Leon County, Florida, to the exclusion of all other lawful venues. 30. NO THIRD -PARTY RIGHTS. The Parties hereto do not intend, nor shall this Agreement be construed to grant any rights, privileges or interest to any person not a party to this Agreement. 50 GRANT - GOVERNMENTAL ENTITY June 2019 Page 17 of 20 FWC Agreement No. 20318 31. JURY TRIAL WAIVER. As part of the consideration for this Agreement, the Parties hereby waive trial by jury in any action or proceeding brought by any party against any other party pertaining to any matter whatsoever arising out of or in any way connected with this Agreement, or with the products or services provided under this Agreement, including but not limited to any claim by the Grantee of quantum meruit. 32. PROHIBITION OF UNAUTHORIZED ALIENS. In accordance with Federal Executive Order 96-236, the Commission shall consider the employment by the Grantee of unauthorized aliens a violation of Section 274A(e) of the Immigration and Nationalization Act. Such violation shall be cause for unilateral cancellation of this Agreement if the Grantee knowingly employs unauthorized aliens. 33. EMPLOYMENT ELIGIBILITY VERIFICATION (E -VERIFY). i. Requirement to Use E -Verify. Section 448.095(2) Florida Statute requires the Contractor to: 1.) utilize the U.S. Department of Homeland Security's E -Verify system to verify the employment eligibility of all new employees hired by the Contractor during the Purchase Order term; and 2.) include in all subcontracts under this Purchase Order, the requirement that subcontractors performing work or providing services pursuant to this Purchase Order utilize the E -Verify system to verify the employment eligibility of all new employees hired by the subcontractor during the term of the subcontract. ii. E -Verify Online. E -Verify is an Internet -based system that allows an employer, using information reported on an employee's Form I-9, Employment Eligibility Verification, to determine the eligibility of all new employees hired to work in the United States. The Department of Homeland Security's E - Verify system can be found online at https://www.e-verify.gov. iii. Enrollment in E -Verify. As a condition precedent to. entering a Purchase Order with the Commission, Contractors and Subcontractors shall register with and use the E -Verify system. Failure to do so shall result in the Purchase Order not being issued, or if discovered after issuance, termination of the Purchase Order. iv. E -Verify Recordkeeping. The Contractor further agrees to maintain records of its participation and compliance with the provisions of the E -Verify program, including participation by its subcontractors as provided above, and to make such records available to the Commission or other authorized state entity consistent with the terms of the Contractor's enrollment in the program. This includes maintaining a copy of proof of the Contractor's and subcontractors' enrollment in the E -Verify Program. If a contractor enters into a contract with a subcontractor, the subcontractor must provide the contractor with an affidavit stating that the subcontractor does not employ, contract with, or subcontract with an unauthorized alien. The contractor shall maintain a copy of such affidavit for the duration of the contract. V. Employment Eligibility Verification & Compliance. Compliance with the terms of the Employment Eligibility Verification provision is made an express condition of this Purchase Order and the Commission may treat a failure to comply as a material breach of the agreement. If the Commission terminates the Purchase Order pursuant to Section 448.095(2)(c) Florida Statute, the contractor may not be awarded a public contract for at least 1 year after the date on which the contract was terminated 51 GRANT - GOVERNMENTAL ENTITY June 2019 Page 18 of 20 FWC Agreement No. 20318 and the Contractor is liable for any additional costs incurred by The Commission as a result of the termination of this Purchase Order. 34. FORCE MAJEURE AND NOTICE OF DELAY FROM FORCE MAJEURE. Neither Party shall be liable to the other for any delay or failure to perform under this Agreement if such delay or failure is neither the fault nor the negligence of the Party or its employees or agents and the delay is due directly to acts of God, wars, acts of public enemies, strikes, fires, floods, or other similar cause wholly beyond the Party's control, or for any of the foregoing that affects subcontractors or suppliers if no alternate source of supply is available. However, in the event of delay from the foregoing causes, the Party shall take all reasonable measures to mitigate any and all resulting delay or disruption in the Party's performance obligation under this Agreement. If the delay is excusable under this paragraph, the delay will not result in any additional charge or cost under the Agreement to either Party. In the case of any delay the Grantee believes is excusable under this paragraph, Grantee shall notify the Commission's Grant Manager in writing of the delay or potential delay and describe the cause of the delay either: (1) within ten (10) calendar days after the cause that creates or will create the delay first arose, if Grantee could reasonably foresee that a delay could occur as a result; or (2) within five (5) calendar days after the date Grantee first had reason to believe that a delay could result, if the delay is not reasonably foreseeable. THE FOREGOING SHALL CONSTITUTE GRANTEE'S SOLE REMEDY OR EXCUSE WITH RESPECT TO DELAY. Providing notice in strict accordance with this paragraph is a condition precedent to such remedy. The Commission, in its sole discretion, will determine if the delay is excusable under this paragraph and will notify Grantee of its decision in writing. No claim for damages, other than for an extension of time, shall be asserted against the Commission. Grantee shall not be entitled to an increase in the Agreement price or payment of any kind from the Commission for direct, indirect, consequential, impact, or other costs, expenses or damages, including but not limited to costs of acceleration or inefficiency arising because of delay, disruption, interference, or hindrance from any cause whatsoever. If performance is suspended or delayed, in whole or in part, due to any of the causes described in this paragraph, after the causeshave ceased to exist, Grantee shall perform at no increased cost, unless the Commission determines, in its sole discretion, that the delay will significantly impair the value of the Agreement to the Commission or the State,in which case, the Commission may do any or all of the following: (1) accept allocated performance or deliveries from Grantee, provided that Grantee grants preferential treatment to the Commission with respect to products or services subjected to allocation; (2) purchase from other sources (without recourse to and by Grantee for the related costs and expenses) to replace all or part of the products or services that are the subject of the delay, which purchases may be deducted from the Agreement quantity; or (3) terminate the Agreement in whole or in part. 35. TIME IS OF THE ESSENCE. Time is of the essence regarding the performance obligations set forth in this Agreement. Any additional deadlines for performance for Grantee's obligation to timely provide deliverables under this Agreement including but not limited to timely submittal of reports, are contained in the Scope of Work, Attachment A. 36. ENTIRE AGREEMENT. This Agreement with all incorporated attachments and exhibits represents the entire Agreement of the Parties. Any alterations, variations, changes, modifications or waivers of provisions of this Agreement shall only be valid when they have been reduced to writing, and duly signed by each of the Parties hereto, unless otherwise provided herein. In the event of conflict, the following order of precedence shall prevail; this Agreement and its attachments, the terms of the solicitation and the Grantee's response to the solicitation. 52 GRANT - GOVERNMENTAL ENTITY June 2019 Page 19 of 20 FWC Agreement No. 20318 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed through their duly authorized signatories on the day and year last written below. Indian River County BOCC Signature Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission Executive Director (or designee) Name: Name: Title: Title: Date: Date: Approved as to form and legality: FWC Attorney Signature Attachments in this Agreement include the following: Attachment A Scope of Work Attachment B Requirements of the Federal and Florida Single Audit Acts Exhibit 1 Federal and State Funding Detail Attachment C Cost Reimbursement Contract Payment Requirements Attachment D Derelict Vessel Removal Best Management Practices Attachment E Letter of Return on Investment for the State Attachment F Sample Invoice Form Attachment G Monthly Progress Report Attachment H Certificate of Completion Attachment I Required Documents Submission List Attachment J DV Grant Monitoring Guidelines 53 GRANT - GOVERNMENTAL ENTITY June 2019 Page 20 of 20 GRANT NAME: FWC Bulk Derelict Vessel Removal Grant AMOUNT OF GRANT: $8,150.00 GRANT # FWC20318 DEPARTMENT RECEIVING GRANT: Public Works / Coastal Engineering Division CONTACT PERSON: Molly Klinepeter TELEPHONE: 772) 226-1651 1. How long is the grant for? Valid through 07/05/2021 2. Does the grant require you to fund this function after the grant is over? 3. Does the grant require a match? If yes, does the grant allow the match to.be In -Kind services? 4. Percentage of match to grant N/A % 5. Grant match amount required $ -n- Starting Date: upon execution 6. Where are the matching funds coming from (i.e. In -Kind Services; Reserve for Contingency)? N/A — No Match Required 7. Does the grant cover capital costs or start-up costs? If no, how much do you think will be needed in capital costs or start-up costs: (Attach a detail listing of costs) 8. Are you adding any additional positions utilizing the grant funds? If yes, please list. (If additional space is needed, please attach a schedule.) Yes X No Yes X No Yes No X LYes No Yes X No Acct. Description Position Position Position Position Position 011.12 1 Regular Salaries 011.13 Other Salaries & Wages (PT) 012.11 Social Security 012.12 Retirement — Contributions , 012.13 Insurance — Life & Health 012.14 Worker's Compensation 012.17 S/Sec. Medicare Matching Fourth Year TOTAL 9. What is the total cost of each position including benefits, capital, start-up, auto expense, travel and operating? Salary and Benefits Operating Costs Capital Total Costs 10. What is the estimated cost of the grant to the county over five years? Signature of Preparer: yne4 zQux*th Date: 4/7/2021 Grant Amount Other Match Costs Not Covered Match Total First Year $8,150.00 $ $ $8,150.00 Second Year $0 $ $ $0 Third Year $0 $ $ $0 Fourth Year $0 $ $ $0 Fifth Year $0 $ $ $0 Signature of Preparer: yne4 zQux*th Date: 4/7/2021 Locations of Derelict Vessels ' Indian River County, Florida BREVARD COUNTYAl_ Q Co Legend Derelict Vessels - Municipal Boundaries Cou", Boundary Seagrass 04 Patchy KContinuous, Dense 0 0.751.5 Map ID Case Number DV -1 FWNE-I9-OFF-017733 OV -2 FWNE-20-OFF-000715 OV -3 FWNE-I9-OFF-001953 DV -4 FWNE-20-OFF-011747 1L . rP5 i j`.I SEBASTIAN \, �,•�� \, 'ORCHID UNTYj ROAD 512";x, _ 7— ,� 510 V •` l J. r L_i IN— C. 85TH J'. INDIAN Text 4 RIVER \ -- — - I SHORES 11 53RD ST •\,_ AIA FELLSMERE —00 1 STATE ROAD 60 60 20TH ST ill VERO BEACH? t i \ r O �,' �� 4 • , O , Z = 41ipNWSL 3 4.5 6 Miles —� S T'. C U C I E'—C O U'N T Y IRC DV Removal Maps 9TH ST SW 8.® INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA MEMORANDUM TO: Jason. E. Brown, County Administrator THROUGH: Richard B. Szpyrka P.E., Public Works Director FROM: Keith McCully, P.E., Stormwater Engineer AV SUBJECT: Approval of Work Order No. AACE-1 With Andersen Andre Consulting Engineers, Inc. for Construction Testing Services for Moorhen Marsh Low Energy Aquatic Plant System DATE: April 9, 2021 DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS Bids for construction of Moorhen Marsh Low Energy Aquatic Plant System, a regional stormwater treatment facility that will use managed aquatic plants to remove nitrogen and phosphorus from North Relief Canal water, were received July 14, 2020 and bid prices were significantly higher than anticipated. Consequently, on August 18, 2020, the Board of County Commissioners voted to reject all bids and directed staff to design a more basic managed aquatic plant treatment facility that will result in lower construction costs. Design and permitting phases are complete and the project has been advertised for construction bids, which are due May 4, 2021. Construction testing services are necessary during the facility's construction and Work Order AACE-1 addresses these issues. Andersen Andre Consulting Engineers, Inc. performed geotechnical investigations for design and is very familiar with the site and the Project. The firm has a continuing contract with Public Works Department for professional geotechnical engineering and construction testing/inspection services. Specific services are listed on the attached Work Order. The lump sum professional services fee associated with Work Order No. AACE-1 is $80,505.00. FUNDING Funding is available from Optional Sales Tax/Public Works/CIP-Moorhen Marsh -PC North, Acct #31524338-066510-16018. Funding Source Amount Optional Sales Tax/Public Works/CIP-Moorhen Marsh -PC North, Acct #31524338-066510-16018 $80,505.00 RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends the Board of County Commissioners approve Work Order No. AACE-1 in the amount of $80,505.00, and authorize the Chairman to execute it on behalf of the County. ATTACHMENTS Work Order No. AACE-1 Exhibit A — Andersen Andre APPROVED AGENDA ITEM FOR April 20, 2021 56 This Work Order Number AACE-1 is entered into as of this day of , 2021, pursuant to that certain Continuing Contract Agreement for Professional Services renewed on September 20, 2016 ("Agreement"), by and between Indian River County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida ("COUNTY") and Anderson Andre Consulting Engineers, Inc. ("CONSULTANT"). .The COUNTY has selected the CONSULTANT to perform the professional services set forth in Part 1 of this Work Order. The CONSULTANT will perform the professional services for the fee schedule set forth in Part 2 of this Work Order. The CONSULTANT will perform the professional services within the timeframe set forth in Part 3 of this Work Order, all in accordance with the terms and provisions set forth in the Agreement. Nothing contained in this Work Order shall conflict with the terms of the Agreement and the terms of the Agreement are incorporated in this Work Order as if fully set forth herein. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Work Order as of the date first written above. CONSULTANT BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ANDERSON ANDRE CONSULTING OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY ENGINEERS, INC. In Title: Joseph E. Flescher, Chairman Attest: Jeffrey R. Smith, Clerk of Court and Comptroller am Deputy Clerk Approved: Jason E. Brown, County Administrator Approved as to form and legal sufficiency: William K. Debraal, Deputy County Attorney 57 PART 1 - SCOPE OF WORK The COUNTY has requested that the CONSULTANT provide professional construction testing services during construction of the COUNTY's Moorhen Marsh Low Energy Aquatic Plant System. The Work is more particularly described in Exhibit A, included herein. PART 2.— COMPENSATION AND PARTIAL PAYMENTS 1. Compensation The COUNTY agrees to pay and the CONSULTANT agrees to accept, a not -to -exceed fee of $80,505.00 for services rendered according to Part 1 of this Work Order and as summarized in Exhibit A. Additional services shall be at the hourly rates as set forth in the Agreement. 2. Partial Payments The COUNTY shall make monthly partial payments to the CONSULTANT for all authorized work pertaining directly to this project performed during the previous calendar month. The CONSULTANT shall submit invoices monthly for services performed and expenses incurred pursuant to this Agreement during the prior month. The CONSULTANT shall submit duly certified invoices in duplicate to the Director of the Public Works Department. For lump sum line items, the amount submitted shall be the prorated amount due for all work performed to date under this phase, determined by applying the percentage of the work completed as certified by the CONSULTANT, to the total due for this phase of the work. For time and material line items, the amount submitted shall be based on the actual hours worked and expenses incurred for the billing period. The amount of the partial payment due the CONSULTANT for the work performed to date under these phases shall be an amount calculated in accordance with the previous paragraph and less previous payments. Per F.S. 218.74(2), the COUNTY will pay approved invoices on or before the forty-fifth day after the COUNTY receives the CONSULTANT's invoice. PART 3 - TIME FOR COMPLETION The construction contract completion time is three hundred days following issuance, of a Notice to Proceed. **END OF WORK ORDER** EXHIBIT A ANDERSEN ANDRE CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. Geotechnical Engineering Construction Materials Testing Environmental Consulting Indian River County BOCC Public Works - Stormwater Division 180127"' Street Vero Beach, FL 32960 Attention: Mr. W. Keith McCully, P.E. PROPOSAL FOR CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS TESTING AND MONITORING SERVICES AACE Proposal No. P20-1599 April 7, 2021 (Rev2) MOORHEN MARSH Low ENERGY AQUATIC PLANT SYSTEM (LEAPS® INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA Andersen Andre Consulting Engineers, Inc. (AACB) is pleased to present this proposal for performing construction materials testing and monitoring services for the Moorhen Marsh LEAPS project which is proposed to be constructed on the northeast corner of 66`h Avenue and 53`d Street in Indian River County, Florida. AACE is the Geotechnical Engineer -of -Record for this project, and has previously issued a Subsurface Exploration and GeotecbnicalEngineeringEvaluation report for the project dated October 9, 2019 (RACE File No. 19-140). ; As part of preparing this proposal, we have reviewed the following documents provided to us: Structural Plans prepared by Kimley-Horn (dated 02/22/21) Civil & Mechanical Plans prepared by IRC Public Works Stormwater Division (dated 03/25/21) Hence, based on our conversations and our review of these plan sets, we understand that it is proposed to construct an approximately 17 -acre aquatic plant water treatment facility (Low Energy Aquatic Plant System - LEAPS intended to reduce contamination/pollutants from the water in the adjacent Indian River Farms Water Control District (IRFWCD) North Relief Canal (NRC). The LEAPS facility will have a pump station near the northwest corner of the site, pumping water from the NRC into the facility. The water will pass through pipes/structures into eight water lettuce scrubber basins after which the water will flow over weirs, through solids sumps and discharge/reoxygenation flumes, and into a transfer channel before it is released back into the NRC. The following describes our understanding of the main components of the LEAPS facility as it relates to our work: The intake pump station/headworks structure will include an approximately 20 -ft deep concrete structure (bottom near EL 2.00 ft) [NAVD88 datum throughout], and will be pipe -connected (42"x29" CAP arch) to the NRC. The water lettuce scrubber basins will each have concrete slabs (EL 20.50 ft), milling berms (for service roads) and interior divider walls/curbs. 834 SW Swan Avenue, Port St. Lucie, Florida 34983 Ph: 772-807-9191 Fx: 772-807-9192 www.aaceinc.com 59 PROPOSAL FOR CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS TESTING AND MONITORING SERVICES MOORHEN MARSH LOW ENERGY AQUATIC PLANT SYSTEM (LEAPSTM) INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA AACE PROPOSAL No. P20-1599 • The solids sumps will have concrete slabs (bottom elevation varies) with overflow weirs (EL 22.44) and concrete flumes with their lowest elevation at 18.50. • The transfer channel (un -lined) will have a bottom elevation of 15.50 and a design water elevation of 18.50. • The transfer channel will be pipe -connected (36" CAP) to the NRC through Structure S1 which will have bottom elevation of 11.28. • Current site elevations are on the order of 17.50 to 19.00 (former citrus grove with furrows and planting beds). As such, after leveling of the site, an average of ±2 feet of fill will likely be needed to raise the overall site grades. Additional project components include perimeter stormwater retention areas (some with interconnecting piping/ structures), a single -story pole barn operations building, perimeter earthen berms, an asphalt paved entrance roadway, unpaved/stabilized interior drive aisles/services roads, etc. W understand that the services for which we are preparing this proposal include: • Monitor proofrolling and backfilling operations and perform in-place density tests as required by the project specifications. • Perform in-place density testing for building pads, driveways and parking areas, slab -on -grades, footings, pipe and structure/pump station backfill, etc. • Sample and test compressive strength of concrete for building construction, weirs, footings, slab -on -grade, basins bottom slabs, etc. • Sample fill and backfill soils for modified Proctor laboratory testing. • Sample subgrade and base materials for LBR laboratory testing. • Geotechnical and Construction Materials Testing engineering consulting throughout the project duration, as needed. • Potential pre- and post -construction video survey of existing/adjacent structures (if needed). • Potential vibration monitoring during compaction efforts (if needed). As such, AACE staff will be on site to observe the work and perform tests to determine substantial compliance (relative to the services of our firm) with the project plans, specifications, and design concepts. AACE staff will not direct the Contractor nor will we have the authority to stop work. Please be aware that neither the presence of our field representatives nor the observation and testing by AACE shall imply our responsibility for defects discovered in the construction work. Further, it is understood that our firm will not be responsible for job or site safety on this project. job site safety is the sole responsibility of the selected Contractor. The proposed budget in this proposal was established based on a "man-hour basis", rather than a "per - test" basis, since it will be difficult to estimate the precise number of density tests and concrete sampling events for this kind of project. Another challenge to a "per -test" proposal is the periodic need for a 2 technician (e.g. during larger concrete pours). As such, for budgeting purposes, we are proposing that AACE staff be involved full-time with the project for approximately 5 months (-20 weeks) out of the overall 10 -month construction schedule, allowing for full-time presence during some periods and lesser to no presence during other periods. 60 PROPOSAL FOR CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS TESTING AND MONITORING SERVICES MOORHEN MARSH Low ENERGY AQUATIC PLANT SYSTEM (LEAPSTn INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA AACE PROPOSAL No. P20-1599 Hence, we estimate the cost of our services will be $80,505.00 (itemized on page 4). The actual cost of AACE's services will be a function of work actually performed in accordance with the fees in our Continuing Services contract with Indian River County. Contractor efficiency, methodology and changes in testing frequencies may affect the overall cost. We will notify you in advance if it appears that the cost estimate will be exceeded. To authorize us to proceed with this project, please execute and return to us a copy of the attached Professional Services Agreement form or a Purchase Order number. If you have any questions or if we can provide any additional information, please feel free to contact us at your convenience. Best Regards, ANDERSEN ANDRE CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. Peter G. Andersen, P.E. David P. Andre, P.E. Principal Engineer Principal Engineer ANDERSEN ANDRE CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC, WWW.AACEINC.COM ACCS PROPOSAL FOR CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS TESTING AND MONITORING SERVICES MOORHEN MARSH Low ENERGY AQUATIC PLANT SYSTEM (LEAPSTM) INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA AACE PROPOSAL No. P20-1599 Estimated Man -Hours (based on an approximate 5-month/20-week involvement) • Sr. Project Engineer; 20 weeks @ 3 hours/week @ $120.00/hour................................ $7,200.00 • Sr. Engineering Technician; 20 weeks @ 40 hours/week* @ $59.00/hour......................... $47,200.00 • Technical Secretary; 20 weeks @ 2 hours/week @ $48.00/hour............ $ , ...................... 1920.00 (*Assuming 8 -hour work days, Monday through Friday) Laboratory Testing • 15 Proctor Tests @ $85.00/test............................................................ $1,275.00 • 4 LBR Tests @ $315.00/test............................................................... $1,260.00 • Allowance for acceptability testing (organic content, percent fines, carbonate content, etc.) ............ $1,500.00 Concrete Testing Proposed Sampling/Testing Frequency; A minimum of one set of four (4) cylinders (7 -day, 2x28 -day and Hold cylinder) and one slump test will be made for every pour, and for each 50 cubic yards for larger pours. We have also include an allowance for air content and unit weight testing, if needed. • Concrete/Grout Sampling; estimated 150 sets @ $88.00/set.................................... $13,200.00 • Air Content (if needed); 50 tests @ $35.00/test............................................... $1,750.00 • Unit Weight (if needed); 50 tests @ $45.00/test................................................ $2,250.00 • Allowance for cylinder pick-up (not scheduled with other work) and limited standby during concrete pours; 50 hours @ $59.00/hour........ $ ...................... 2950.00 TOTAL ANTICIPATED TESTING BUDGET ........... $80,505.00 The following conditions apply to this project: (1) When not present full-time, the Contractor (or Indian River County Representative) must contact Andersen Andre Consulting Engineers, Inc. at (772) 807-9191. a minimum of 24 hours prior to any testing and 48 hours prior to weekend, holiday and evening work. (2) Unit rates apply to standard working days, Monday through Friday, 7:30 a.m to 5:00 p.m. Testing and hourly rates will be increased by 50% for weekend, holiday or after-hours services. (3) If our testing estimate for a specific work element is insufficient for that particular activity, resources from another work element can be used without prior authorization from the client as long as our total cost estimate is not exceeded. We will notify you in advance if it appears that the cost estimate presented in the attached unit fee schedule will be exceeded. (4) Asphalt sampling/ testing, is not included herein. We will be pleased to revise this proposal to include such testing, if needed. ANDERSEN ANDRE CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. WWW.AACEINC.COM ANDERSEN ANDRE CONSULTING ENGINEERS, Inc. PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT AACE Proposal No: P20-1599 Project Name: PROPOSAL FOR CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS TESTING AND MONITORING SERVICES MOORHEN MARSH LOW ENERGY AQUATIC PLANT SYSTEM (LEAPSTM) Client: Indian River County BOCC Address: 180127' Street Public Works - Stormwater Division Vero Beach, FL 32960. Attn: Mr. W. Keith McCully, P.E. Client hereby requests and authorizes Andersen Andre Consulting Engineers, Inc. ("AACE") to perform the following services: Provide Construction Materials Testing services for the proposed MOORHEN MARSH LOW ENERGY AQUATIC PLANT SYSTEM (LEAPS) project, as detailed herein. Estimated Budget: $80,505.00 Payment Terms: Net 30 days from invoice date; invoices will be sent every four weeks for continued or extended projects. Interest charges, 1'/2% per month following the due date. Proposal Acceptance: By accepting this Proposal, the Terms and Conditions of this Proposal, including the Terms on this page, and Andersen Andre Consulting Engineers, Inc.'s General Conditions appearing on the reverse side of this page are incorporated herein by reference. In the event this Professional Services Agreement was received by facsimile or via email, Client hereby confirms that the above described Proposal, the Terms and Conditions of this Proposal, including the Terms on this page, and Andersen Andre Consulting Engineers, Inc.'s General Conditions have been made available and are incorporated in this agreement. PURSUANT TO FLORIDA STATUTES SECTION 558.0035 (2013) AN INDIVIDUAL EMPLOYEE OR AGENT MAY NOT BE HELD INDIVIDUALLY LIABLE FOR NEGLIGENCE. Accepted by CLIENT: Accepted for AACE: By: N Title: Date: Billing Address: By. Name: Peter G. Andersen, P.E. Title: Principal Engineer Date: April 7, 2021 aev2) Phone/Email: 63 AACE GENERAL CONDITIONS 1- Parties And Scope Of Work: Andersen Andre Consulting Engineers, Inc. (hereinafter referred to as "RACE") shall include said company, its individual professionals, particular division, subsidiary or affiliate performing the Work. "Work" means the specific geotechnical, analytical, testing, environmental or other service to be performed by AACE as set forth in AACE's proposal, the Client's acceptance thereof, both incorporated herein by this reference, and these General Conditions. "Client" refers to the person or business entity ordering the Work to be done by AACE. If the client is ordering the Work on behalf of another, the Client represents and warrants that the Client is the duly authorized agent of said party for the purpose of ordering and directing said Work. Further, Client shall disclose any such agency relationship to AACE in writing before the commencement of AACE's Work hereunder. Client agrees that AACE's professional duties are specifically limited to the Work as set forth in AACE's proposal. The Client assumes sole responsibility for determining whether the quantity and the nature of the Work ordered by the Client is adequate and sufficient for the Client's intended purpose. Client shall communicate these General Conditions to each and every third party to whom the Client transmits any part of AACE's Work. AACE's Work is for the exclusive use of Client, and its properly disclosed principal. In no event shall AACE have any duty or obligation to any third party. The ordering of Work from AACE shall constitute acceptance of the terms of AACE's proposal and these General Conditions. 2 - Scheduling of Work: If AACE is required to delay commencement of the work, or if, upon embarking on its work, AACE is required to stop, delay or otherwise interrupt the progress of work as a result of changes in the scope of work requested by the client, to fulfill the requirements of third parties, interruptions in the progress of construction, or other causes beyond the exclusive reasonable control of AACE, additional charges will be applicable and payable by the Client. 3 - Responsibility: AACE's work shall not include determining, supervising, or implementing the means, methods, techniques, sequences or procedures of construction. AACE shall not be responsible for evaluating, reporting or affecting job conditions concerning health, safety or welfare. AACE's work or failure to perform same shall not in any way excuse any contractor, subcontractor or supplier from performance of its work in accordance with the contract documents. 4 - Payment: Payment shall be due within 30 days after date of invoice. Interest at the rate of 18% per annum (or the highest rate allowable by law) from 30 days after date of invoice to date payment is received will be added to all amounts not paid within 30 days after date of invoice. All attorney fees and expenses associated with collection of past due invoices will be paid by Client. 5 - Right -of -Entry: Unless otherwise agreed, Client will furnish right -of -entry on the property for RACE to make the planned borings, surveys, and/or explorations. AACE will take reasonable precautions to minimize damage to the property caused by its equipment and sampling procedures, but the cost of restoration or damage which may result from the planned operations is not included in the contracted amount. If Client desires to restore the property to its former condition, AACE will accomplish this and add the cost to its fee. 6 - Damage to Existing Man-made Objects: It shall be the responsibility of the Owner or his duly authorized representative to disclose the presence and accurate location of all hidden or obscure man-made objects relative to field tests, sampling, or boring locations. When cautioned, advised or given data in writing that reveal the presence or potential presence of underground or overground obstructions, such as utilities, AACE will give special instructions to its field personnel. As evidenced by your acceptance of this proposal, Client agrees to defend, indemnify and save harmless AACE from all claims, suits, losses, personal injuries, death and property Lability resulting from subsurface conditions or damages to subsurface structures or man made objects, owned by CLent or third parties, occurring in the performance of the proposed work, whose presence and exact locations were not revealed to AACE in writing, whether such claims or damages are caused in whole or in part by RACE, and agree to reimburse AACE for expenses in connection with any such claims or suits, including reasonable attorney's fees. Client's obligation to indemnify is limited to $1 million per occurrence, which Client agrees bears a reasonable commercial relationship to the Work undertaken by RACE. Client further agrees that these general conditions are a part of the Work's specifications or bid documents, if any. 7 - Warranty and Limitation of Liability: AACE shall perform services for Client in a professional manner, using that degree of care and skill ordinarily exercised by and consistent with the standards of competent consultants practicing in the same or a similar locality as the project. In the event any portion of the services fails to comply with this warranty obligation and AACE is promptly notified in writing prior to one year after completion of such portion of the services, AACE will re -perform such portion of the services, or if re -performance is impracticable, AACE will refund the amount of compensation paid to AACE for such portion of the services. This warranty is in Leu of all other warranties. No other warranty, expressed or implied, including warranties of merchantability and fitness for a particular purpose is made or intended by the proposal for consulting services, by furnishing an oral response of the findings made or by any representations made regarding the services included in this agreement. In no event shall AACE be liable for any special, indirect, incidental, or consequential loss or delay or time -related damages. The remedies set forth herein are exclusive and the total liability of consultant whether in contract, tort (including negligence whether sole or concurrent), or otherwise arising out of, connected with or resulting from the services provided pursuant to this Agreement shall not exceed the total fees paid by Client or $y50,000.00, whichever is greater. Client may, upon written request received within five days of Client's acceptance hereof, increase the limit of AACE's liability by agreeing to pay AACE an additional sum as agreed in writing prior to the commencement of AACE's services. This charge is not to be construed as being a charge for insurance of any type, but is increased consideration for the greater liability involved. For services involving or relating to pollution, it is further agreed that the Client shall indemnify and hold harmless RACE and their consultants, agents and employees from and against all claims, damages, losses and expenses, direct and indirect or consequential damages, including but not limited to fees and charges of attorneys and court and arbitration costs, arising out of or resulting from the performance of the work by RACE, or claims against AACE arising from the work of others. This indemnification provision extends to claims against AACE which arise out of, are related to, or are based upon, the disposal, discharge, escape, release or saturation of vapors, fumes, acids, alkalis, toxic chemicals, liquids, gases or any other material, irritant, contaminant or pollutant in or into the atmosphere or on, onto, upon, in or into the surface or subsurface. Client's obligation to indemnify is limited to $1 million per occurrence, which Client agrees bears a reasonable commercial relationship to the Work undertaken by RACE. Client further agrees that these general conditions are a part of the Work's specifications or bid documents, if any. 8 - Sampling or Testing Location: Unless specifically stated to the contrary, the fees included in this proposal do not include costs associated with professional land surveying of the site or the accurate horizontal and vertical locations of tests. Field tests or boring locations described in our report or shown on our sketches are based on specific information furnished to us by others or estimates made in the field by our technicians. Such dimensions, depths or elevations should be considered as approximations unless otherwise stated in the report. 9 - Sample Handling and Retention: Generally test samples or specimens are consumed and/or substantially altered during the conduct of tests and RACE, at its sole discretion, will dispose (subject to the following) of any remaining residue immediately upon completion of test unless required in writing by the Client to store or otherwise handle the samples. (a) NON HAZARDOUS SAMPLES: At Client's written request, RACE will maintain preservable test samples and specimens or the residue therefrom for thirty (30) days after submission of AACE's report to Client free of storage charges. After the initial 30 days and upon written request, AACE will retain test specimens or samples for a mutually acceptable storage charge and period of time. (b) HAZARDOUS OR POTENTIALLY HAZARDOUS SAMPLES: In the event that samples contain substances or constituents hazardous or detrimental to human health, safety or the environment as defined by federal, state or local statutes, regulations, or ordinances ("Hazardous Substances" and "Hazardous Constituents", respectively), AACE will, after completion of testing and at Client's expense: (I) return such samples to Client, (ii) using a manifest signed by Client as generator, will have such samples transported to a location selected by Client for final disposal. Client agrees to pay all costs associated with the storage, transport, and disposal of such samples. Client recognizes and agrees that AACE is acting as a bailee and at no time does AACE assume title of said waste. 10 - Discovery of Unanticipated Hazardous Materials: Hazardous materials or certain types of hazardous materials may exist at a site where there is no reason to believe they could or should be present. AACE and Client agree that the discovery of unanticipated hazardous materials constitutes a changed condition mandating a renegotiation of the scope of work or termination of services. AACE and Client also agree that the discovery of unanticipated hazardous materials may make it necessary for AACE to take immediate measures to protect health and safety. AACE agrees to notify Client as soon as practicable should unanticipated hazardous materials or suspected hazardous materials be encountered. Client encourages AACE to take any and all measures that, in AACE's professional opinion, are justified to preserve and protect the health and safety of AACE's personnel and the public. Client agrees to compensate AACE for the additional cost of working to protect employees' and the public's health and safety. In addition, Client waives any claim against RACE, and agrees to defend, indemnify and save AACE harmless from any claim or liability for injury or loss arising from AACE's discovery of unanticipated hazardous materials or suspected hazardous materials. Client also agrees to compensate AACE for any time spent and expenses incurred by AACE in defense of any such claim, with such compensation to be based upon AACE's prevailing fee schedule and expense reimbursement policy relative to recovery of direct project costs. 11- Joint and Several Liability: The concept of joint and several liability is basically this: When two or more parties are considered responsible for causing injury or damage, anyone of the parties may be made to provide compensation for as much as 100% of the damages assessed. When applied to hazardous materials projects, it is possible that the concept of joint and several liability could be construed to make AACE partly or wholly responsible for damages created directly or indirectly by the hazardous materials. Client agrees that it would be unfair for AACE to be exposed to such an action, because AACE had nothing whatsoever to do with the creation of the hazardous condition. Accordingly, Client waives any claim against RACE, and agrees to defend, indemnify and save AACE harmless from any claim or liability for injury or loss arising from application of a joint and several Lability concept that would, in any manner, hold or seek to hold AACE responsible for creating a hazardous condition or permitting one to exist. Client also agrees to compensate AACE for any time spent and expenses incurred by AACE in defense of any such claim, with such compensation to be based upon AACE's prevailing fee schedule and expense reimbursement policy relative to recovery of direct project costs. 12 - Legal Jurisdiction: The parties agree that any actions brought to enforce any provision of this Agreement shall only be brought in a court of competent jurisdiction located in St. Lucie County, Florida. All causes of action arising out of AACE's Work shall be deemed to have accrued and the applicable statutes of limitation shall commence to run not later than either the date of substantial completion of the Work for acts or failures to act occurring prior to substantial completion, or the date of issuance of final payment for acts or failures to act occurring after substantial completion of the Work. 13 - Force Majeure: AACE shall not be held responsible for any delay or failure in performance of any part of this Agreement to the extent such delay or failure is caused by fire, flood, explosion, war, strike, embargo, government requireme t, civil or military authority, acts of God, act or omission of subcontractors, carriers, c� or other similar causes beyond its control. 84F. INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA CONSENT MEMORANDUM 1 TO: Honorable Board of County Commissioners THROUGH: Jason E. Brown, County Administrator FROM: Tad Stone, Director Department of Emergency Services DATE: April 14, 2021 SUBJECT: Modification #1 to Subgrant Agreement (EMPA) between the Florida Division of Emergency Management and Indian River County Agreement Number A0090 It is respectfully requested that the information contained herein be given formal consideration by the Board of County Commissioners at the next scheduled meeting. DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS: i The Indian River County Board of County Commissioners executed an agreement with the Florida Division of Emergency Management on June 9, 2020 for the Emergency Management Preparedness Assistance Grant (EMPA). The EMPA grant is used to enhance and improve emergency management mitigation, planning, response and recovery directly affecting the lives and property of Indian River County residents and visitors. The Florida Division of Emergency Management has submitted Modification #I to Agreement Number A0090 which modifies certain emergency management requirements to comply with the grant. FUNDING: The original agreement was for $105,806 and -modification #1 to the agreement increases the amount of funds by $23,150 (total funding amount of $128,956) in the General Fund/Emergency Management Grant/EMAP Fees account (00123825-034840). Account Description Account Number Amount EMAP Fees 00123825-034840 $23,150 RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of Modification #1 of State Funded Subgrant Agreement A0090 between the State of Florida, Division of Emergency Management and Indian River County Emergency Management. ATTACHMENTS: 1. EMPA Agreement Modification #1 65 MODIFICATION #1 TO SUBGRANT AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE DIVISION OF EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AND INDIAN RIVER COUNTY This Modification is made and entered irito by and between the State of Florida, Division of Emergency Management ("the Division"), and Indian River County ("Recipient"), to modify Contract Number A0090, which began on July 1, 2020 ("the Agreement"). WHEREAS, the Division and the Recipient have entered into the Agreement, pursuant to which the Division has provided a subgrant to Recipient under the State Homeland Security Grant program of $105,806; WHEREAS, the Division and the Recipient desire to modify the Agreement; WHEREAS, the parties desire to increase the amount of funds by $23,150.00; WHEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises of the parties contained herein, the parties. agree as follows: 1. Paragraph 4(a) and (c) of the Agreement is hereby amended to read as follows: (9) FUNDING CONSIDERATION (a) This is a cost -reimbursement Agreement, Subject to the availability of funds. I (c) The Division will reimburse the Sub -Recipient only for allowable costs incurred by the Sub -Recipient in the successful completion of each deliverable: The maximum 'reimbursement amount for each deliverable is outlined in. Proposed Budget Detail Worksheet (Attachment A (2)) and Scopes of Work (Attachment A). The maximum reimbursement amount for the entirety of this Agreement is $128,956.00 2. The funds to be disbursed under this Agreement are increased by the sum of 23150.00 so that the total funding hereunder is $128,956.00. The funds subgranted to the Recipient under this Modification must be used in accordance With the following requirements as outlined in the Agreement. 3. The Scope of Work (Attachment A) to 'the Agreement, is hereby modified asset forth in 1st Revised Attachment A to this Modification, which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference.! 4. The Allowable Costs and Eligible Activities —Budget Direction, Attachment (1) to the Agreement, is hereby modified as set forth in 1 st Revised Attachment A to 66 this Modification, which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. 5, The Proposed Program Budget Detail Worksheet, Attachment A (2) to the Agreement, is here by modified as set forth in 15t Revised Attachment A to this Modification, which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. 6. All provisions of the Agreement being modified and any attachments thereto in conflict with this Modification, shall be and are hereby changed to conform with this Modification, effective as of the date of the last execution of this Modification by both parties. 7. All provisions not in conflict with this Modification remains in full force and effect and are to be performed at the level specified in this Agreement. 67 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Modification as of the dates set out below. RECIPIENT: INDIAN RIVER COUNTY By: Name and Title: Date: DIVISION OF EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT am Name and Title: Jared Moskowitz, Director Date: M I FY 2020 — 2021 EAAPA AGREEMENT ATTACHMENT A = SCOPE OF WORK 1. GENERAL POLICY Recipient shall comply with the following requirements, and if applicable, ensure all contracts require compliance with the following requirements. In carrying out this Agreement, Recipient shall provide all necessary personnel, materials, services, and facilities, except otherwise provided herein, to carry out the program. Recipient shall designate an individual, referred to by Division as the Grant Manager, who will be responsible for ensuring that the following activities are adhered to: + Planning; Organization; ; + Equipment; • Training; • Exercise; and • Management and Administration The intent of the Emergency Management Preparedness and Assistance Grant (EMPA) is to provide state funds to assist local grovernments in preparing for all hazards as authorized by section 252.373, Florida Statutes. EMPA shall be awarded to a county for the use and benefit of the County Emergency Management Agency. Funds shall be allocated to implement and administer county emergency management programs including management and administration. Consistent with Rule 27P-19.010(11), Florida Administrative Code, the Division shall determine allowable costs in accordance with 2 C.F.R. Part 200, entitled ", Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards." IL RECIPIENT RESPONSIBILITIES Recipient shall support efforts to build and sustain core capabilities across the Prevention, Protection, Mitigation, Response, and Recovery mission areas described in the National Preparedness Goat. Counties must be able to prepare for, respond to, recover from, and mitigate against natural and man- made disasters/emergencies. Each Emergency Management staff person must work the number hours and assume the responsibilities for the dudes in their official position description as well as provide the coordination and support for all incidents within their, jurisdiction. TASKS AND QUARTERLY Di;LNERASLES Recipient must successfully complete the following tasks and deliverables throughout the period of performance. Quarterly Tasks (Form1 B) will need to be provided each quarter to show completion or progress towards the completion of each task. Quarterly deliverables must be submitted to the Grant Manager's email address provided in Subparagraph15(b) as stated in the Scope of Work. Recipient must also provide a certification of completion on the deliverable checklist. `r �� 'c:t:�: 69 :a t +;ti "_,r-C�fnxz��r „"^t v"" _.;:i �-'�='.- •""'i F,{' -?.�� _z_ � - h y. �: N..,cv--`'• .,nti�":�rr`4'"x.::t,'.�co.5i�r iz ate' .cam "t';.,.-� R ~ Rol Z41611111zliff4j, A. EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT STAFF Each County Emergency Management Agency must annually certify their commitment to employ and maintain either a Full-time Director or Part-time Coordinator consistent with Rule 27P-19.005(4) and (5), Florida Administrative Code. I Pursuant to section 252,38(1)(c), Florida Statutes, the County Emergency Management Agency shall perform emergency management functions throughout the territorial limits of the county in which it Is organized. Additionally, the County Emergency Management Agency shall conduct such activities outside its territorial limits as required by law and in accordance with state and county emergency management plans and mutual aid agreements. j The County Emergency Management Agency shall serve as liaison for and coordinator of municipalities' requests for state and federal assistance during post -',disaster emergency operations.. If the Recipient is a county with a population of 75,000 or more, then the Recipient shall employ a full-time county emergency management director. If the Recipient is a county with a population less than 75,000, or if the Recipient is a county that is a party to an interAurisdictional emergency management agreement entered into pursuant to section 252.38(3)(b), Florida Statutes then the Recipient shall employ either: • An Emergency Management Coordinator who works at least twenty (20) hours a week in that capacity; or, • A full-time director In order to demonstrate successful completion of ail required tasks for Quarter 1, the Recipient must submit ttie following items in the Division's SharePoint portal or WebEOC: DELIVERABLES: s • . The Division Exhibit 4, certification letter for the full-time Emergency Management Director or part-time Coordinator; in accordance with Rule 27P-19.004, Florida Administrative Code each quarter; • The Division Form 4 --Staffing Detail and position descriptions for funded emergency management staff; • A guarterly Report as outlined in Quarterly Reports (Attachment A(3)); and • The full-time Emergency Management Direct o is or part-time Coordinator's certified timesheets or mystubs. l Reporting Requirements: Quarter 1� 2 3 -7Quarter�4 � j��Q�yuarttteffr lilii� �� Qi�iyY ?1•'_• {Quarter L��Li�� .. £ rlG'_W I Supporting Documentation; Invoices, receipts, paystubs, earning statements, cancelled checks, credit card statements, bank statements for proof of paymet at least equal to the amount of reimbursement requested for this quarter. 70 c,.; T' z r "Y .'�'d "'k-? ,r°4{ n•r---nom-�•rc,:e •ri�;=t„,rx,� fgy�rz-•__-iv:.. _.. --+U "�-..r"'�-�..fv''��' �N � �� s .i.r_x�c �; �� 1`X- ,ca3.:-rm� •;�.: <,.��'-� Ct-y.ffv �.��v�, �F` l� A. QUARTERLY MATCH Throughout the period of this Agreement, and as required by Rule 2713-19.011(1), Florida Administrative Code, the Recipient shall match base grant funds "at the amount either equal to the average of the previous three years' level of county general revenue funding of the County Emergency Management Agency or the level of funding far the County Emergency Management Agency for the last fiscal year, whichever is lower." NOTE: Rule 27P-19.011(1), Florida Administrative Code, states: "County general revenue funding for 911 services, emergency medical services; law enforcement, criminal justice, public works or other services outside the emergency management responsibilities assigned to the County Emergency Management Agency by section 252.38, Florida Statutes., shall not be included in determining the "level of county funding of the County Emergency Management Agency."' In accordance with Rule 2713-19.011(2), Florida Administrative Code, and if "exceptional financial circumstances" exist, then the Recipient may request from the Division a match reduction, DELIVERABLES: • The Division Form 3 - Local Budget Match Certification; • A copy of the current and accurate County Emergency Management Local Budget (General Revenue) including the budget approval date. All requests for a budget match -reduction shall be requested no later than 45 days after the county budget has been approved; • A copy of the local EM general revenue expenditure (general ledger) report. Reporting Requirements: TASK 3: RESPONSE CAPABILITIES A. SITE IDENTIFICATION DATA/LOCATIONS AND HURRICANE SHELTER RETROFIT Throughout the period of this Agreement, the Recipient must maintain current county emergency management and other contacts through the Division's SharePoint including County Director and Alternate contacts, State Mutual Aid Agreement contacts, and many more; The Recipient must maintain SharePoint site identification data including location and attribute Information for fire stations, law enforcement, emergency medical services, emergency operations centers) and call centers; The Recipient must maintain WebEOC site identification location and attribute information of all pre- identified County Staging Areas (CSAs) and County Points of Distribution (PODs), and; The Recipient must complete, and upload Hurricane Shelter Retrofit information in WebEOC portal in accordance with Florida's statewide Hurricane Shelter Space Deficit Elimination program. 71 .DELIVERABLES: • Attachment F - The Recipient must maintain current county emergency management and other contacts through the Division's SharePoint including County Director and Alternate contacts, State Mutual Aid Agreement contacts, and many more; • Attachment . -IF - Maintain site data in SharePoint including location and attribute information for all fire stations, law enforcement, emergency medical services, emergency operations center(s) and call centers; • Attachment F - Maintain site data in WebEOC including location and attribute information for all pre -identified sites for County Staging Areas (CSAs) and County Points of Distribution (PODs); • Attachment G - Complete the Hurricane Shelter Retrofit Items A -G in the worksheet provided no later than March 31, 2021 and upload into WebEOC. Reporting Requirements: Quarter 1 Quarter 2 Quarter 3 Quarter 4 ' _ ► NIA ''"^''Diiiv Submit = Updates N/Ar NIA G Ditl les Due Only � 4r ;,� 'i u • +r{ :� t�.�; �s �-.;�uL•e.:.�-ry"�.: 2 �§t" s:.�.f'y :rnj-'• c _ . _ 'vP`''::4.�'�. �'��s'srr. �*ir«F.,�.. ;:�;:....`�--' :zi��«11•'"hr::T:T� K"""''Lyw...��"-�i..,...�• ..R� " I TASK 4: RECOVERY CAPABILITIES A. DISASTER RECOVERY CENTER LOCATIONS I Throughout the period of this Agreement, the Recipient must maintain potential Disaster Recovery Center (DRC) locations and provide basic information in WebEOC which identifies physical location, contact persons, site characteristics, interior, office characteristics, phone service, and sketches. DELIVERABLES • Attachment H - Support of Recovery capabilities (Attachment H), identify potential Disaster Recovery Center (DRC) locations and provide basic information in WebEOC. Reporting Requirements: Quarter 1 Quarter 2 j Quarter 3 Quarter 4 l NIA NIA NIA ''"^''Diiiv - - 1 TASK 5: Emergency Management Accreditation Program (EMAP) EMAP is a voluntary standards, assessment, and accreditation process for disaster preparedness Programs. The standard assesses the Recipient's documentation and processes through all phases of emergency management. The standard requires an all -hazard and whole -community approach to emergency management in-line with the priorities of the Division. If a Recipient receives an "Accredited" status, it is valid for five years, after which time the!Recipient must apply for reaccreditation. Recipients 72 undergoing reaccreditation are assessed by all of the standards as thoroughly as during their initial accreditation. RECIPIENT QUALIFiCATIONS • Must be a Florida County with an established emergency management agency as defined in section 258.38(1), Florida Statutes; and • Must be committed to completing, and eventually complete, the EMAP Accreditation Process. RECIPIENT RESPONSIBILITIES • Coordinate its EMAP Accreditation process directly with the EMAP organization; • Provide the Division with estimated dates and dollar amounts associated with EMAP accreditation fees; • Forward official EMAP Invoices and proof of payment to the Division as it relates to the reimbursable costs below; and • Successfully complete the EMAP Accreditation Process under this agreement or subsequent agreement. DELIVERABLES When submitting requests for reimbursement, the recipient is required to include the following: • A signed letter requesting reimbursement to include which fee(s) to be reimbursed iAW Section F in Attachment A (1) and the requested amount; • The official EMAP invoice(s) attached to the signed letter; and; • Proof of payment to EMAP for the attached invoice(s). REIMBURSEMENT OF FUNDS: Disbursement of funds under this agreement is contingent upon the Recipient working towards, or receiving, EMAP accreditation. If, after receiving funds, the Recipient fails to receive, or is denied accreditation by EMAP, or the Recipient fails to pay funds due to EMAP, all funds dispersed under this agreement will be refunded to the Division, even if the failure to receive EMAP accreditation occurs in a subsequent fiscal year. Reporting Requiremenis: Quarter 1 Quarter 2 ! Quarter 3 Quarter 4 '~ t.: 73 FY 2020 — 2021 EMPA AGREEMENT ATTACHMENT A (1) ALLOWABE COSTS AND ELIGIBLE ACTIVITIES — BUDGET DIRECTIONS I. CATEGORIES AND ELIGIBLE ACTIVITIES The 2020 EMPA Funding Guidance allowable costs are divided into the following categories: Planning, Organization, Equipment, Training, Exercise, and Management and Administration. A. PLANNING Planning spans all five National Preparedness Goal (the Goal) mission areas and provides a baseline for determining potential threats and hazards, required capabilities, required resources, and establishes a framework for roles and responsibilities. Planning provides a methodical way to engage the whole community in the development of a strategic, operational, and/or community-based approach to preparedness. Plans should have prior review and approval from the respective DEM state program. Funds may not be reimbursed for any plans that are not approved. EMPA Program funds may be used to develop or enhance emergency management planning activities. Some examples include, but not limited to: • Emergency Operation. Plans/ Local Comprehensive Emergency Management Planning • Communications Plans • Administrative Plans • Whole Community Engagement/Planning • Resource Management Planning • Sheltering and Evacuation Planning • Recovery Planning • Continuity Plans For planning expenditures to qualify for reimbursement under this Agreement, the Recipient must submit a final plan to the Division and the Division's Natural Hazard Planning Manager must approve that pian. As part of any request for reimbursement for planning expenditures, the Recipient must submit the following to the Division: • Copies of contracts or agreements prior to contracting with consultants or sub -contractors providing services; • Invoice from any consultant/contractor involved in the planning (Note — grant agreement must be referenced on the invoice); • Copies of all planning materials and work product (e.g. meeting documents, copies of plans); • If a meeting was held by Recipient, an agenda and signup sheet with meeting date must be included; • Proof of payment (e.g, canceled check: electronic funds transfer, credit card statement); • Complete debarment form and/or Sam.gov for any contractors/consultants; • Proof of purchase methodology (e.g. quotes, sole source, state contract, competitive bid results); • Invoices and proof of payment for Travel costs (e.g., airfare, mileage, per diem, hotel) related to planning activities. B. OPERATIONAL EMPA Program funds may be used for all day -today preparedness activities in support of the four phases of emergency management (preparedness, response, recovery, and mitigation). Reimbursable personnel costs include salary, overtime, and. backfill, compensatory time off, and associated fringe benefits. Rules 27P-19.004 and 27P-19.0061, Florida Administrative Code,, outline the minimum performance level (definition below). Each Emergency Management staff person must be available to work the 74 number of hours and assume the responsib6ities for the duties In their official position description as well as provide the coordination and support for all incidents within the jurisdiction on a 24-hour basis. Personnel Cost - Rules 27P-11.004, 2713-11.0061, Florida Administrative Code: Counties with populations of 75,000 or more must have a full-time emergency management director. Counties with populations of less than 75,000 or party to an inter -jurisdictional emergency management agreement entered into pursuant to section 252.38(3)(b), Florida Statutes, that is recognized by the Governor by executive order or rule, are encouraged to have a full-time director. However, as a minimum, such a county must have an emergency management coordinator who works at least twenty (20) hours a week in that capacity. "Full-time Emergency Management Director" means a single professional emergency management program Administrator working full-time as identified in the position description established by the governing body of the jurisdiction.. Eligible "Operational Costo items include, but are not limited to: • Salaries and Fringe Benefits • Copies of certified timesheets with employee and supervisor signature documenting hours worked or Division Form 6 - Time and Effort and proof employee was paid (paystubs, earning statements, and.payroll expenditure reports). • Utilities (electric, water 2nd sewage) • Service/Maintenance agreements (provide vendor debarment and service agreement for contractual .services) • Office Supplies/Materials • IT Software Upgrades • Memberships • Publications • Postage • Storage • Other Personnel/Contractual Services • Reimbursement for services by a person(s) who is not a regular or full-time employee filling established positions. This includes but is not limited to temporary employees, student or graduate assistants, fellowships, part time academic employment, board members, consultants, and other services. • Consultant Services require a pre -approved Contract or purchase order by the Division. Copies of additional quotes should also be supplied when requesting pre -approval. These requests should be sent to the grant manager for the Division for review. Funding for Critical Emergency Supplies Critical emergency supplies --such as shelf stable products, water, and basic medical supplies --are an allowable expense under EMPA. DHS/FEMA must approve a state's five-year viable inventory management plan prior to allocating grant funds for stockpiling purposes. The five-year plan should include a distribution strategy and related sustainment costs if the grant expenditure is over $100,000. Operational Costs Supporting Documentation if the recipient seeks reimbursement for operational activities, then the following shall be submitted: • For salaries, provide copies of certified timesheets with employee and supervisor signature documenting hours worked or Division Form 6 - Time and Effort and proof employee was paid (paystubs, earning statements, payroll expenditure reports). • Expense items need to have copies of invoices, receipts and cancelled checks, credit card statements, bank statements for proof of payment. All documentation for reimbursement amounts must be clearly visible and defined (i.e., highlighted, underlined, circled on the required supporting documentation). 75 C. EQUIPMENT Provided the cost of the item qualifies as reasonable and necessary for the successful completion of a task required by this Agreement, an item on the FEMA AEL that is specifically coded for the Emergency Management Performance Grant ("EMPG°) Program satisfies the minimum level of service for an equipment purchase under this Agreement. If an item qualifies as reasonable and necessary, and if the item is EMPG-coded on the FEMA AEL, then the Recipient does not need to obtain permission from the Division prior to purchasing the item in order to seek reimbursement. If the Recipient seeks.reimbursement for the purchase of an Item that isnot EMPG-coded on the FEMA AEL, then the Recipient must receive permission from the Division prior to purchasing the item. If the Recipient purchases such an Item without receiving permission from the Division beforehand, then the Division will not provide any reimbursement for that purchase. Allowable equipment includes equipment from the following AEL categories: • Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) (Category 1) • Information Technology (Category 4) • Cybersecurity Enhancement Equipment (Category 5) • Interoperable Communications Equipment (Category 6) • Detection Equipment (Category 7) • Power Equipment (Category 10) • Chemical, Biological, Radiological, Nuclear, and Explosive (CBRNE) Reference Materials (Category 11) • CBRNE Incident Response Vehicles (Category 12) • Physical Security Enhancement Equipment (Category 14) • CBRNE Logistical Support Equipment (Category 19) • Other Authorized Equipment (Category 21)' The Authorized Equipment List (AEL) is a list of approved equipment types allowed under FEMA's preparedness grant programs and can be located at httos://www.fema.Qov/authorized-equiprnent4ist. If Recipients have questions conceming the eligibility of equipment, they' shall contact their Grant Manager for clarification. Recipients should analyze the cost benefits of purchasing versus leasing equipment, especially high cost items and those subject to rapid technical advances. Large equipment purchases must be identified and explained, For more information regarding property, management standards for equipment, please reference 2 C.F.R. Part 200, including 2 C.F.R. §§ 200.310, 200.313, and 200.316. Equipment Acquisition Costs Supportinra_Documentation • Provide copies of invoices, receipts and cancelled checks, credit card statements, bank statements for proof of payment • Provide the Authorized Equipment List .(AEL) # for each equipment purchase. D. TRAINING EMPA Training funds may be used for a range of emergency management -related training activities to enhance the capabilities of state and local emergency management personnel through the establishment, support, conduct, and attendance of training. Training should foster the development of a community - oriented approach to emergency management that emphasizes engagement at the community level, strengthens best practices, and provides a path toward building sustainable resilience. The Recipient can successfully complete an. authorized course either by attending or by conducting that course. • In order to receive payment for successfully attending a training course, the Recipient must provide the Division with a certificate of completion; additionally, the Recipient must provide the 76 Division with all receipts that document the costs incurred by the Recipient in order to attend the course. In order to receive payment for successfully conducting a course, the Recipient must provide the Division with the course sign -in sheet. Additlonally, the Recipient must provide the Division with all receipts that document the costs incurred by the Recipient in order to conduct the course. In order to receive payment for successfully conducting a workshop, the recipient must provide the Division with workshop sign -in sheets and materials used for workshop. Additionally, the Recipient must provide the Division with all receipts that document the costs incurred by the Recipient in order to conduct the workshop. For training, the number of participants must be a minimum of fifteen (15) in order to Justify the cost of holding a course. For questions regarding adequate number of participants, please contact the Division State Training Officer for course specific guidance. Unless the recipient receives advance written approval from the State Training Officer for the number of participants, then the Division must reduce the amount authorized for reimbursement on a pro -rata basis for any training with less than fifteen (15) participants. When conducting a training that shall include meals for the attendees, the recipient shall submit a request for approval to the Division no later than twenty-five (25) days prior to the event to allow for both the Division and the Department of Financial Services to review. The request for meals must be submitted on letterhead and must include the date of exercise, agenda, number of attendees, and costs of meals. Allowable training -related costs include the following: • Develop, Deliver, and Evaluate Training. This includes costs related to administering the training: planning, scheduling, facilities, materials and supplies, reproduction of materials, and equipment. Training should provide the opportunity to demonstrate and validate skills seamed, as well as to identify any gaps in these skills. Any training or training gaps, including those for children and individuals with disabilities or access and functional needs, should be identified in the Integrated Preparedness Program (IPP) and addressed in the training cycle. States are:; encouraged to use existing training rather than developing new courses. When developing new courses states are encouraged to apply the Analyze, Design, Develop, Implement and Evaluate (ADDIS) model for instruction design. • Overtime and Backfill. The entire amount of overtime costs, including payments related to backfilling personnel, which are the direct result of attendance at FEMA and/or approved training courses and programs are allowable. These cosic are allowed only to the extent the payment for such services is in accordance with the policies of the state,or units) of local government and has the approval of the state or FEMA, whichever is applicable. In no case is dual compensation allowable. That is, an employee of a unit of government may not receive compensation from their unit or agency of government AND from an award for a single period of time (e.g., 1:00 p.m. to 5:00 p.m,), even though such work may benefit both activities. • Travel. Travel costs (e.g., airfare, mileage, per diem, and hotel) are allowable as expenses by employees who are on travel status for official business related to approved training. • Hiring of Full or Part -Time Staff or Contractors/Consultants. Full or part-time staff or contractors/consultants may be hired to support direct training -related activities. Payment of salaries and fringe benefits must be in accordance with the policies of the state or unit(s) of local government and have the approval of the state or FEMA, whichever is applicable. • Certification/Recertification of Instructors. Costs associated with the certification and re- certification of instructors are allowed. States are encouraged to follow the FEMA Instructor Quality Assurance Program to ensure a minimum level of competency and corresponding levels of evaluation of student learning. This is particularly important for those courses which involve training of trainers. Conferences The Division recognizes the important role that conferences can play in the professional development of emergency managers. 2 C.F.R: §200.432 defines the term conference as "a meeting, retreat, seminar, symposium, workshop or event whose primary purpose is the dissemination of technical information beyond the non -Federal entity and is necessary and reasonable for successful performance under the Federal award." Rule 691-42.002(3), Florida Administrative Code, defines the term conference as: The coming together of persons with a common interest or interests for the purpose of deliberation, interchange of views, or for the removal of differences or disputes and for discussion of their common problems and interests. The term also includes simliar meetings such as seminars and workshops which are large formal group meetings that are programmed and supervised to accomplish intensive research, study, discussion, and work in some specific field or on a governmental problem or problems. A conference does not mean the coming together of agency or interagency personnel. For travel to a conference or convention to qualify for reimbursement, the cost must be reasonable and attendance at the conference must be necessary for the successful completion of a task required by this Agreement. Provided the cost qualifies as reasonable and necessary for the successful completion of a task required by this Agreement, travel to a conference that complies with the requirements of Rule 691-42.004, Florida Administrative Code, satisfies the minimum level of service for conference. travel under this Agreement, In pertinent part, Rule 691-42.004(1), Florida Administrative Code, states "No public funds shall be expended for attendance at conferences or conventions unless • The main purpose of the conference or convention is in connection with the official business of the state and directly related to the performance of the statutory duties and responsibilities of the agency participating; • The activity provides a direct educational or other benefit supporting the work and public purpose of the person attending; • The duties and responsibilities of the traveler attending such meetings are compatible with the objectives of the conference or convention; and • The request for payment of travel expenses is otherwise incompliance with these rules. Provided the cost qualifies as reasonable and necessary for the successful completion of a task required by this Agreement, and provided any related travel complies with the requirements of Rule 691-42.004, Florida Administrative Code, conferences may qualify for reimbursement under this Agreement: Requests for reimbursement for payment of the registration fee or for a conference or convention must include: • A statement explaining how the expense directly. relates to the Recipient's successful performance of a task outlined in this Agreement; • A copy of those pages of the agenda that itemizes the registration fee; • A copy of local travel policy; and, • A copy of the travel voucher or a statement that no travel costs were incurred, if applicable. When a meal is included in a registration fee, the meal allowance must be deducted from the reimbursement claim, even if the traveler decides for personal reasons not to eat the meal, See section 112.061(6)(c), Florida Statutes rNo.one, whether traveling out of or In state, shall be reimbursed for any meal or lodging included in a convention or conference registration fee paid by the state°). A continental breakfast is considered a meal and must be deducted if included in a registration fee for a convention or conference. However, in the case where a meal is provided by a hotel orairline, the traveler shall be allowed to claim the meal allowance provided by law. Class A, Class B, and Class C Travel: • Class A travel is continuous travel of 24 hours or more away from official headquarters. The travel day for Class A is based on a calendar day (midnight to.midnight). • Class B travel is continuous travel of less than 24 hours which involves overnight absence away from official headquarters. The travel day for Class B travel begins at the same time as the travel period. • Class C travel is short or day trips in which the traveler is not away from his/her official headquarters overnight. Class C allowances are currently not authorized for reimbursement. Per diem shall be calculated using four six -hour periods (quarters) beginning at midnight for Class A or when travel begins for Class B travel. Travelers may only switch from actual to per diem while on Class A travel on a midnight to midnight basis. A traveler on Class A or B travel who elects to be reimbursed on a per diem basis is allowed $20.00 for each quarter from the time of departure until the time of return. Reimbursement for. Mea! Allowances.That Exceed the Staiie Rates The Division shall not reimburse for any meal allowance that exceeds $6 for breakfast, $11 for lunch, or $19 for dinner unless: • For counties — the requirements of section 112.061(14), Florida Statutes, are satisfied; • The costs do not exceed charges normally'allowed by the Recipient in its regular operations as the result of the Recipient's written travel policy (in other words, the reimbursement rates apply uniformly to all travel by the Recipient); and, • The costs do not exceed the reimbursement rates established by the United States General Services Administration ("GSA") for that locale (see httus://www,gsa,nov/portal/content/104877). 1 Hotel Accommodations • A traveler may not claim per diem or lodging reimbursement for overnight travel within fifty (50) miles (one-way) of his or. her headquarters or residence unless the circumstances necessitating the overnight stay are fully explained by the traveler and approved by the Division. • Absent prior approval from the Division, the cost of any hotel accommodation shall not exceed $150 per night. Tralning Costs Supporting Documentation • Copies of contracts or agreements with consultants or sub -contractors providing services; • Copies of invoices, receipts and cancelled checks, credit card statements and bank statements for proof of payment; I • Copies of the agenda, certificates and/or sign in sheets (if using prepopulated sign in sheets they must be certified by the Emergency Management Director or'Lead Instructor verifying attendance). ; 79 For travel and conferences related to EMPA activities: • Copies of all receipts must be submitted (i.e., airfare, proof of mileage, toll receipts, hotel receipts, car rental receipts, etc.) Receipts must be itemized and match the dates of travel/conference; • Copies of Conferences must be providing an agenda. Proof of payment is also required for all travel and conferences. If the Recipient ;seeks reimbursement for travel costs that exceed the amounts stated in section 112.061(6)(b), Florida Statutes ($6 for breakfast, $11 for lunch, and $19 for dinner), then the Recipient must provide documentation that: The costs are reasonable and do not exceed charges normally allowed by the Recipient in its regular operations as a result of the Recipient's written travel policy; and participation of the individual in the travel is necessary to the Federal award. E. EXERCISES Exercises conducted with grant funds should test and evaluate performance towards meeting capability targets established in a jurisdiction's Integrated Preparedness Program (iPP) for the core capabilities needed to address its greatest risks. Allowable Exercise-Retated Costs + Design, Develop, Conduct and Evaluate an Exercise. This includes costs related to planning, meeting space and other meeting costs, facilitation costs, materials and supplies, travel, and documentation. Recipients are encouraged to use free pudic space/locations/facilities, whenever available, prior to the rental of space/locations/facilities. Exercises shall provide the opportunity to demonstrate and validate skills .learned, as well as to identify any gaps in theseskills. Gaps identified during an exercise including those for children and individuals with disabilities or access and functional needs, shall be identified in the AARAP and addressed in the exercise cycle. • Hiring of Contractors or Consultants: Contractors or Consultants may be hired to support direct exercise activities. Payment of salaries and fringe benefits must be in accordance with the policies of the state or unit(s) of local government and have the approval of the state. The services of contractors/consultants may also be procured to support the design, development, conduct and evaluation of exercises. • Overtime and Backfill. The entire amount of overtime costs, including payments related to backfilling personnel, which are the direct result of time spent on the design, development and conduct of exercises are allowable expenses. These costs are allowed only to the extent the payment for such services is in accordance with the policies of the local government. In no case is dual compensation allowable. That is, an employee of a unit of government may not receive compensation from their unit or agency or government AND .from an award for a single period of time (e.g., i:00 p.m. to 5:00 p.m.), even though such work may benefit both activities. Travel. Travel costs (e.g., airfare, mileage, per diem, hotel) are allowable as expenses by employees who are on travel status for official business related to the planning and conduct of the exercise activities. • Supplies. Supplies are items that are expended or consumed during the course of the planning and conduct of the exercise activities (e.g., gloves, non-sterile masks, fuel, and disposable protective equipment), • Other Items. These. costs are limited to items. consu med in direct support of exercise activities such as the rental of space/locations for planning and conducting an exercise, rental of equipment, and the procurement of other essential nondurable goods. Recipients are encouraged to use free public space/locations, whenever available, prior to the rental of space/locations. Costs associated with inclusive practices and the provision of reasonable accommodations and modifications that facilitate full access for children and adults with disabilities are allowable. When conducting an exercise that shall include meals for the attendees, the recipient shall submit a request for approval to the Division no later than twenty-five (25) days prior to the event to allow for both the Division and the Department of Financial Services to review. The request for meals must be submitted on letterhead and must include the date of exercise, agenda, number of attendees, and costs of meals. Unauthorized Exercise -Related Costs • Reimbursement for the maintenance and/or wear and tear costs of general use vehicles (e.g., construction vehicles) and emergency response apparatus (e.g., fire trucks, ambulances). The only vehicle costs that are reimbursable are fueligasoline or mileage; • Equipment that is purchased for permanent installation and/or use, beyond the scope of exercise conduct (e.g., electronic messaging signs); • Durable and non -durable goods purchased for installation and/or use beyond the scope of exercise conduct. If the recipient seeks reimbursement for exercise activities, then the following shall be submitted: + Documentation clearly indicating the purpose/objectives of the exercise (e.g. Situation Manual, Exercise Plan); After -action report with Improvement Plan (AARAP), Sign -In sheets, Agenda; • Receipts and proof of payment (e.g: canceled check, electronic funds transfer confirmation, credit card statement, bank statement) for supplies expenditures (e,g. copying paper, gloves, tap, etc.); • Invoices and proof of payment for Travel costs (e.g., Internal travel voucher, airfare, mileage, per diem, hotel) related to exercise activities; • . Proof of purchase methodology, if applicable (e.g. quotes, sole source, state contract, competitive bid results). No later than ninety (90) days after completion of an exercise, the recipient must upload to the Division's SharePoint portal at: https:/Ioortal.floridadisaster.orrx an After Action Report (AAR) that includes the • following: An Improvement Plan; and, A roster of participants. F. Emergency Management Accreditation Program (EMAP) This is a cost -reimbursement agreement for the actual costs associated with EMAP Accreditation, as outlined below and stated on official EMAP invoices. Prior to reimbursement, deliverables are subject to review and acceptance by the Division. The criteria for acceptance of deliverables are based on the most recent regulations,'guidelines, or directives related to the particular task and deliverable. The three reimbursable EMAP fees under this agreement are: • EMAP Application Fee: Issued by EMAP after Recipient submits their application for assessment. This fee Is currently estimated at $7500, subject to the actual invoice from EMAP. + EMAP On -Site Assessment Fee: Required by EMAP before the Recipient's on-site assessment. This fee is currently estimated to be between $10,000 and $15,000, subject to the actual invoice from EMAP. + EMAP Accreditation Fee: Required by EMAP before Recipient's EMAP Accreditation is granted. This fee is currently estimated to be between $2000 and $6000, subject to the actual invoice from EMAP. G. MANAGEMENT AND ADMINISTRATIVE (M&A) M&A activities are those defined as directly relating to the management and administration of EMPA Program funds, such as financial management and monitoring. It should be noted that.salaries of state and local emergency managers are not typically categorized as M&A, unless the state or local EMA chooses to assign personnel to specific M&A activities. Management and Administrative Costs Supporting Documentation • Copies of certified timesheets with employee and supervisor signature documenting hours worked or Division Form S - Time and Effort and proof employee was paid (paystubs, earning statements, and payroll expenditure reports); • Costs for M&A activities are allowed up to 5'/0 of the total award amount. Supplanting Prohibited Section 252.372, Florida Statutes, states that the monies from the EMPA Trust Fund "may not be used to supplant existing funding." Additionally, Rule 27P-19.003(3), Florida Administrative Code, states: "Funds received from the [EMPAJ Trust Fund may not be used to supplant existing funding, nor shall funds from one program under the Trust Fund be used to match funds received from another program under the Trust Fund." OTHER CRITICAL. INFORMATION A. RULE 27P-19, FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE COD_ E Rule 270-19.010(11), Florida Administrative Code, states, "Allowable costs shall be determined in accordance with applicable Federal Office of Management and Budget Circulars..." Therefore, unless a specific exception applies, 2 CFR Part 200 Subpart A (Definitions) and Subpart E (Cost Principles) shall apply to this Agreement. Expenses In order to qualify for reimbursement under the terms of this. Agreement, an expense incurred by the Recipient must be reasonable and necessary for the successful completion of a task required by this Agreement. If an expense fails to qualify as either reasonable or necessary to successfully compete a task, then the Division shall not provide any reimbursement for that expense. NOTE: This Scope of Work recognizes that each Recipient: • Might be at a different level of preparedness than another Recipient • Operates within a unique geography • Faces unique threats and hazards • Serres a unique population Therefore, what might qualify as reasonable and necessary for one Recipient to successfully complete a task under this Agreement might not qualify as reasonable and necessary for another Recipient to successfully complete a task. Conversely, what might not qualify for one may qualify for another. In order to avoid a "one size file all" approach, this Agreement provides some level of flexibility. If a unique cost (e.g. equipment not listed on the EM PG AEL) qualifies as reasonable and necessary for the successful completion of a task under this Agreement, and if the Recipient receives permission from the Division prior to incurring that unique cost, then the Division shall reimburse the Recipient for that cost. Performance In order to qualify for reimbursement under the terms of this Agreement, the Recipient's performance must satisfy the minimum level of service required for the successful completion of a task required by this Agreement. If the performance fails to satisfy the minimum level of service, then the Division shall not provide any reimbursement for that performance. B. INDIRECT COSTS Indirect cost is allowable under this program as described in 2 C.F.R. Part 200, including 2 C.F. R. § 200.414. Recipients with a negotiated cost rate agreement that desire to charge indirect costs to an award must provide a copy of their negotiated indirect cost rate agreement at the time of application. :1 Recipients that are not required by 2 C.F.R. Part 200 to have a negotiated indirect cost rate agreement but are required by 2 C.F.R. Part 200 to develop an Indirect cost rate proposal must provide a copy of their proposal at time of application. Post -award requests to charge Indirect cost will be considered on case-by-case basis and based upon the submission of an agreement or proposal. C. PROCUREMENT All Procurement transactions will be conducted in a manner providing full and open competition and shall comply with the standards articulated in: • 2 C.F.R. Part 200; • Chapter 287, Florida Statues: and, Any local procurement policy. Per 2 CFR 200.318 through 200.326, Recipients are required to adhere to ceriain procurement standards for entering contracts for personnel or services. This includes full and open competition, methods of procurement to follow, federal or passthrough entityreview, and including federal provisions intro contracts. D. FINANCIAL CONSEQUENCES Actions to Address Noncompliance: In the case of any potential or actual noncompliance, The Division may place special conditions on an award per 2 C.F.R. §§ 200.207 and 200.338, Division may place a hold on funds until the matter is corrected, or additional information Is provided per 2 C.F.R. § 200.338, or it may do both. In the event the noncompliance is not able to be corrected by imposing additional conditions or if the recipient refuses to correct the matter, Division may use other remedies, allowed under 2 C.F.R. § 200.338, These remedies include actions to disallow costs, recover funds, wholly or partly suspend, or terminate the award, initiate suspension, and debarment proceedings, withhold further federal awards, or take other actions that may be legally available. Reference., 2 C.F.R. 200 -- Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards 83 FY 2020 — 2021 EMPA AGREEMENT ATTACHMENT A (2) PROPOSED PROGRAM BUDGET DETAIL WORKSHEET The Recipient shall use the Emergency Management Preparedness and Assistance ("EMPA") Trust Fund monies authorized by this Agreement in order to complete the tasks outlined in the Scope of Work (Attachment A). The "Proposed Program Budget Detail Worksheet" serves as a guide for both the Recipient and the Division during the performance of the tasks outlined in the Scope of Work (Attachment A). I Prior to execution of this Agreement, the Recipient shall complete the "Proposed Program Budget Detail Worksheet" listed below. If the Recipient fails to complete the "Proposed Program Budget Detail Worksheet", then the Division shall not execute this' Agreement. After execution of this Agreement, the Recipient may change the allocation amounts in the "Proposed Program Budget Detail Worksheet." If the Recipient changes the "Proposed Program Budget Detail Worksheet", then the Recipient's quarterly reports must include an updated "Proposed Program Budget Detail Worksheet" to reflect current expenditures. i BUDGET SUMMARY AND EXPENDITURES RECIPIENT: INDIAN RIVER, COUNTY OF AGREEMENT: A-0090 1. PLANNING j 2. ORGANIZATION 104,550.80 3. EQUIPMENT ( 1,255.20 4. TRAINING Emergency Operations Plan 5. EXERCISE 6. EMAP $23,150.00 6. MANAGEMENT AND ADMINISTRATION 7. TOTAL AWARD 128,956.00 ,1=Y; 2021 iP} R SED. P# OG A UQGIEI �DEYAII.'_`Y a iKSNE > 1GI8LE AanvM1 S' A1lowahfe Planning Costs �' - r ��' fQuantitaY� � Un%t Cost Total Cost=. Emergency Operations Plan Salaries and Fringe Benefits (Contractors and Consultants Supplies Travel/per diem related to planning activities z"'aPL:IINNINGXi�ENDIT€1RS. ,AIIoWabie'Orgateization Costs x ;� ;' -s; Costtity'iQuan Tai Salaries and Fringe Benefits (EM Personnel) 1 $100,000 $100,000 Salaries and Fringe Benefits,(Contractors-oand Consulfants : Utilities (electric; :water and sewage), Service%Ma`intenance agreement's 1 $1,188.00 $1,188.00 Office Supplies/'Material's 1 $3,362.80 $3,362.80 IT`Softy aiwL7pgrades Memberships 1. Publications r Postage i Storage. � _ t;>,e� ae' ,+� k f+��- � N h 3 .n•s•e• �3: �F .,C�. ,Wxfi � •'' a f 4 3 -A viable Eq ipmenrt A quisitioin=Costs`' � ,Gr 4k�L.�E Quantity 4 Unit Cos j wr .L+ a T tat Co t r " tr ?,'..l'T •a`-' }i.�r'� .�` A c'� 'Cjs• �� yk+ lsonai precbve equlpmei�t S 1tx,��4,. n. L 1 ^s _ 11... � •. fS. ,._ .. ".f ..- �. {r'}xws5 4 ai 1r.C•.c._ 7�..r, !•�. �`..'1Y..Y�..'G(�'x.Y., 'S .- r-ihs�.. -T� s `�y .c�$^P'� _ r4'h Y1.y��"�a'�xA -t .J2 Cyber 3ecticity.e har�cement equiprnent;��'� �;.��'� ��All xaQ� ti.'"�: v t "L.� Y a �+; �' .J"' ..vy f-tV" r "? "+ suf i T*.3�rr.•� .+: r v �N- - c � - 3.>'' +>a"�...r. • � r- r e: tnfero�ierableorrtmunications equipmentq;. .4«" ........- .:.... .. ... �. a. fc _ ;fit et'ectioraCnpm nt�Y''tijLri��a^�LC.�vxSswyf �ii`ak`cgPrwihiRaEt ,y,..q�.- .ix3'. '�'�a••��5'"n '7 3- -�-� : '�c�`T,�a�•. R� roP �iy�i�?+cy�F<�,'�";r(�rs�� r..« !M•.�^^e'.P 4 reJ� sYh. ,( 1"-'V ii ,.:e•[" `t -<' Pawerie uiDment � � 4 > �'�fS;.i:`[d�_.�_..._�.alc^�� S��,c?= �RtVER#e enceMartals -S YF t - Z .•`.�„'%�'R !`4 � +fihe.�Y- 'tii'1n:q g,� ,Cn'•� �W t�M�[�,� �' x•.d ��.C+,��. r��,t�[ri: a�WY� •c3 *t?N• „CBRRIE Incldef�Res Onse�Vef�+�%s�c>"�.� �;�'��:-.�� ...��.:r�.� t��x �: �•�",tlt. t`!'+ �r��'-b�i�`�� ;c' ]�•fi - 1' t i". _. r tx'-It ..iri'� cct vx �Ji •y,'�> xv^,�..,..-. dr.-L�S - I?hyslcalSecu tyEnhahcement Equipment 'may ._.r .. _ ._t.. '�;a .. �. �'ja, _� ";a b ' �eAi k.'�?e - t . ,� '_t^'k-r—,;5 X57'' r a ; t7 •S 1� � a' na •' �Y.�✓r l� � r �Y d�%�:f" F� r _ - -�':�# - N �' -. - �11`_+�'f G r ii o �c'�r�i�?'�r�'��r��_'.f3-�Y=�� uL'3rNi�^]Ng� .•iii'4 4'i�, }`..wh�'.xi G•Ii... ti+l� -"_,{..P.+��Z�3'j��z-�•'.'Ji�A:.. �iD. Q ��..L� CBRNE Logistical SupportEquipment 19AF-01-MOB- Ramps 4 $298.40 $1,193.60.. K'�-I3n 's- �`..- 7 +k '•"L nit'' a 4^35§".x>rr �tiaer authorized Fowl rraent�coStS i ?c F d ,� n �4 Y} fY fi4f S iF N „q...n.. Rif f,. % 53'Y n++A!'.'t('a...., e�:•,•i-S.r.. �r.';L,.>P .:r- xl�F T F 75� iNT � R -_.e. _. _...�,.x..-3. :cs .. :21 GN 00 OCEQ - EOC Equipment & Supplies (provide description -of EOC equipment & supplies) 16AC-04VETS-Equipment and Supplies ;.. ._ 2 __$30.80 $61,.60 V -i `' M. i�eRSL. .S^'h•; P .t3:'•a 4.1 q .r .6 X ��{it�tiitlEt+iT4EXPBf�IG?i i ES- jr k' r� �`Ot-,i: •. 1255 ,�F a ', h+.3."`u". `"'.z� v "�` c".," x'tj3t •r'i�E} rfi :i•'.it n.b%k>_.si MIR AAllowable TraMI NO9g,"y1- t r x� w 4 .aa.++t� �rar t` i<xs Y'Sa' �.._ k 'i ..-i��'-?' Y.�"'��1.2-+n�...-.,i.�'G-.:N'{�''fi'i;F. r.,t.Fn ?',�".�x. K+2.. ... l.A.�a FI. ,v.:�ii:�.h�"1;C��+rx/eg:•i�.i 7.�'�`i"..t' 3 r` t� ''� S �quant�ty i 6..':,.._,c. _. iaidi T'' rS"i"• TC" i�'-r F' +..:i to �'Unit�Cost�Total �. �� tsh.:�witi3 �-.. f j. is, _'Ri�!'_.t(rrr.•�+g" r�` +LL"'Y Cost °°- b , Y� �' p•t. 85 Salaries and Fringe Be_h,6fits (EM Personnel) -Salaries and Fringe Benefits (Contractors and Consultants Develop, Deliver Tra"hing Workshops 'and Conferences Certification/Recertification:of Instructors Travel Supplies Qve.ft,ime and Backfill 7. Un X�pst, Salaries and Fringe Benefits (EM Personnel) Salaries and Fringe Benefits (Contractors and Consultants 'Design., Develop, Conduct and Evaluate an Exercise in accordance with HSEEP standards Exercise, Planni.rng Workshop Travel Supplies: Overtime and B,ack,fill ZIL aIERCISE,E W —ffo-t. -5- os; - WJWCo§V'4.��- ,Quantity EMAP Appli cation.Fe.e 1 $5,500.00 $5,500.00 EMAP Oh-Sit6 Assessment Fee 1 $14,150.00 $14,150.00 EMAP Accreditation Fee 1 $3,500.00 $3,500.00 Ell 'EMA MIES-- TQTA�!�, 0'15kkkbif 50- ;f 0 Q . Ailvwabl�e Management and Administration Costs : Quantity,4` UnWC-61-�`" dtaftdifg ',�JW5 a w&id) U#' -iJ Salaries and Fringe Benefits (EM Personnel) M- It— M, IT R rf ggs,4$ ii-A D ME M W.10 41"110 11 11 M 09 0 '0 91 06 Q-1 nm *0,�` REVISION DATE: Consent Item �`a Indian River County, Florida Department of Utility Services Board Memorandum Date: April 7, 2021 To: Jason E. Brown, County Administrator From: Vincent Burke, PE, Director of Utility Services Through: Cindy Corrente, Finance Manager, Utility Services Prepared by: Terry Southard, Operations Manager, Utility Services Subject: Request to Waive Bid Process for Caustic Soda Chemicals Background / Analysis: Indian River County Department of Utility Services (IRCDUS) has two (2) water production facilities that use caustic soda for the treatment of water. With most chemicals used in water production, staff goes out to bid for an annual locked -in rate. However, the caustic soda market is quite volatile, and the bid process does not yield the best prices. Therefore, staff typically seeks price quotes every 8-12 weeks in order to ensure we are getting the lowest cost available for caustic. As a result, we process several purchase orders each year for caustic. IRCDUS typically obtains quotes from the same three vendors: Allied Universal Corp, Brenntag Mid -South Inc., and Harcros Chemicals Inc. It is staff's intention to encumber a minimum of $50,000.00 each time a quote is obtained. Encumbrances over $35,000.00 require the County Administrator's approval. Funding: Funds for caustic soda are available in the Chemical account within the Utilities Operating Fund. Utilities operating funds are generated from water and sewer revenues. A total of $256,000.00 is budgeted for caustic soda in Fiscal Year 2020/2021, with $106,000.00 remaining available. Description Account Number Amount Water Production/Chemicals 47121936-035230 $106,000.00 Recommendation: Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners waive the requirement for bids for caustic soda and authorize the Purchasing Manager to approve purchase orders up to the available budgeted amount to the vendor offering the lowest or best quote. 87 F:\Utilities\UTILITY- EMPLOYEE FOLDERS\Terry South ard\Agendas\Agenda-219 Chemical Caustic Soda Waive Bid Process cmc jh.docx 0' Consent Item Indian River County, Florida Department of Utility Services Board Memorandum Date: March 23, 2021 To: Jason E. Brown, County Administrator From: Vincent Burke, PE, Director of Utility Services Through: Jennifer Hyde, Purchasing Manager Prepared by: Terry Southard, Operations Manager, Utility Services Subject: South County Reverse Osmosis Water Treatment Plant Part A Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition System Upgrades, Kimley-Horn and Associates Work Order 4 Background/Analysis: Indian River County Department of Utility Services (IRCDUS) owns and operates two water plants: the South County Reverse Osmosis (SCRO) Water Treatment Plant (WTP) located at 1550 9th Street SW, Vero Beach, and the North County Reverse Osmosis (NCRO) WTP located at 775158 th Ave, Vero Beach. In 2014, Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc., (KHA) prepared a Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition (SCADA)/Program Logic Control (PLC) System Evaluation for the two water treatment plants and provided recommendations for improvements. The study recommended phasing of the project in order to support each subsequent improvement while also maintaining operations at the plants. The recommendation has since evolved to include a redundancy and resiliency approach through the addition of a new high service pump PLC, independent of the main PLC. Pursuant to the Agreement for Professional Services for Water Plant and Water Resources Engineering Services Request for Quotation 2019070, KHA has provided Work Order 4 to prepare bid documents, assist IRCDUS with bidding/procurement, provide construction phase services for proposed improvements, and the integration labor required to program each of the respective upgrades to the main PLC and proposed high service pump panel. Funding: Funds for this project in the amount of $133,884.00 are derived from the Renewal and Replacement (R&R) budget in the Utilities operating fund. Utilities operating funds are generated from water and sewer sales. Description Account Number Amount WTF SCADA System Updates 47121936-044699-19536 $133,884.00 F:\Utilities\UTILITY - EMPLOYEE FOLDERS\Terry Southard\Agendas\Agenda-South RO Part A SCADA Upgrades Vb.Doc Page 18f.3 Recommendation: Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners approve Work Order No. 4 with Kimley-Horn and Associates, in the amount of $133,884.00, for professional services to include design, bidding, procurement, construction phase assistance, and integration labor required to program each upgrade to the main program logic control and high service pump panel, and authorize the Chairman to execute said work order on their behalf. Attachment: 1. Work Order No. 4 with KHA dated March 2021 F:\Utilities\UTILITY - EMPLOYEE FOLDERS\Terry Southard\Agendas\Agenda-South RO Part A SCADA Upgrades Vb.Doc 89 AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FOR WATER PLANT AND WATER RESOURCES ENGINEERING SERVICES RFQ2019070 WORK ORDER 4 Indian River County Utilities Department Part A — Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition System Upgrades (SCADA) at South Oslo Road Water Treatment Plant , This Work Order Number 4 is entered into as of this_ day of , 202, pursuant to that certain AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FOR WATER PLANT AND WATER RESOURCES ENGINEERING SERVICES RFQ2019070 entered into as of this 5th day of November, 2019 (collectively referred to as the "Agreement"), by and between INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Florida ("COUNTY") and Kimlev-Horn and Associates, Inc., ("Consultant"). I The .COUNTY has selected the Consultant to perform the professional services set forth on Exhibit A (Scope of Work), attached to this Work Order and made part hereof by this reference. The professional services will be performed by the Consultant for the fee schedule set forth in Exhibit B (Fee Schedule), attached to this Work Order and made a part hereof by this reference. The Consultant will perform the professional services within the timeframe more particularly set forth in Exhibit C (Time Schedule), attached to this Work Order and made a part hereof by this reference all in accordance with the terms and provisions set forth in the Agreement. Pursuant to paragraph 1.4 of the Agreement, nothing contained in any Work Order shall conflict with the terms of the Agreement and the terms of the Agreement shall be deemed to be incorporated in each individual Work Order as if fully set forth herein. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Work Order as of the date first written above. CONSULTANT: Print Name: Brian Good, P.E. Title: Senior Vice President BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY By: Chairman , BCC Approved Date: Attest: Jeffrey R. Smith, Clerk of Court and Comptroller i By: I Deputy Clerk Approved: Jason E. Brown, County Administrator i Approved as to form and legal sufficiency: Dylan T. Reingold, County Attorney 90 EXHIBIT #1 Part A - Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition (SCADA) System Upgrades at South Oslo Road Water Treatment Plant PROJECT UNDERSTANDING In 2014, Kimley-Horn prepared a SCADA/PLC System Evaluation for the North and South water systems and provided recommendations for improvements. The study presented the phasing to be able to support each subsequent improvement while also maintaining operations of the WTP. Following the first task of remediation, the subsequent task included installation of a new main PLC. This recommendation has since evolved to improve upon the County's redundancy and resiliency approach through the addition of a new high service pump PLC, independent of the Main PLC. The intent of this work is to allow the Oslo facility the ability to pump water to customers should there be a failure in the main PLC, or a need for treatment to be down for maintenance. The 2014 evaluation provided recommendations to replace the Main PLC as part of step 2. Given the time that has elapsed since and the failures that have occurred recently, it is IRCU's desire to implement these improvements immediately. The sequence of the proposed improvements to the WTP control system is provided to sustain operations and ensure reliability of treatment operations throughout upcoming improvements to the WTP. Accordingly, the County has requested Kimley-Horn:prepare a scope of services to provide the design, bidding, construction, programming, and integration assistance to initiate these improvements. IRCU had originally allocated $355,000 for wellfield PLC replacements, but desires to utilize these funds to address the Main and HSP PLC improvements at the WTP in accordance with the recommendations of the original study. Conceptual cost estimate for this proposed work is $350,000. The following scope outlines the work necessary to prepare bid documents, assist the County with bidding/ procurement, provide construction phase services for the proposed improvements, and the integration labor required to program each of the respective upgrades to the Main PLC and proposed High Service Panel. 91 K:\WPB_Civil\General\Black\Florida\IRCU\Oslo - PLC Part A\20210325 - Scope - Oslo PLC Part A Scope.docx Page 1 of 5 SCOPE OF WORK Consultant will utilize the services and provide coordination of Control Systems Design, Inc., and C&W Engineering for SCADA system integration and electrical engineering in the execution of these tasks. TASK 1- DESIGN PHASE SERVICES Consultant will prepare bid documents consisting of site plan depicting improvements which are needed for present and future phasing, and panel drawings and specifications for replacement and installation of new Remote I/O and PLC panels. Drawings will consist of control panel details, subplate layout, dead front layout, wiring diagrams, and specified PLC and I/O equipment. The drawings will depict modifications to the Main PLC and the proposed High Service Pump PLC. Consultant will prepare design deliverables at 100% design interval. Design deliverables will consist of plans, specifications with bid item list, and opinion of probable construction costs (OPCC). Consultant will perform one (1) site visit for data collection. TASK 2 - BID PHASE Consultant will provide coordination with IRCU purchasing department for bidding the proposed. improvements. Consultant will attend one (1) pre-bid meeting and respond to reasonable number of questions from potential bidders. TASK 3 - CONSTRUCTION PHASE SERVICES Consultant will attend one (1) pre -construction meeting with the Contractor, Owner, Electrical Engineer, and Integrator. Consultant will review shop drawings for conformance with the bid documents. It is assumed that up to three (3) shop drawings will be reviewed. Consultant will respond to a reasonable number of requests for information (up to 4 assumed). Consultant will review Contractor's monthly applications for payment. 92 K:\WPB_Civil\General\Black\Florida\IRCLI\Oslo - PLC Part A\20210325 - Scope - Oslo PLC Part A Scope.docx Page 2 of 5 Consultant will attend up to three (2) progress meetings on-site. Consultant will assist the Owner with closeout documentation review prior to completion of the project. TASK 4 - PROGRAMMING AND INTEGRATION Consultant will review and completely vet the current HMI migration to VTScada, test and verify operations local and with all external systems. Checkout and update of all PLC to HMI interfaces including scaling and troubleshooting all points will be performed to establish a baseline completed migration. Contractor will design/ Install New HSP PLC Control panel, relocate all I/O from existing main PLC, test, verify and Consultant will program the new PLC and get working directly with VTScada HMI. Consultant will modify Main PLC Panel to remove the right most PLC5, A/B switch interconnecting wiring to make PLC5A a stand-alone PLC and install a new ControlLogix PLC rack with two EN2T modules, CLX, and a network switch provided by the contractor. SCHEDULE In general, the following schedule is anticipated and consultant will work as expeditiously as possible to meet it: Task 1: 2 weeks after NTP issuance Task 2: 2 months (based on IRC procurement schedule) Task 3: 5 months after Contractor awarded project Task 4: To occur concurrent to Task 3 ADDITIONAL SERVICES The following services are not included in the Scope of Services for this project, but may be required depending on circumstances that may arise during the execution of this project. Additional services include, but may not be limited to the following: • Purchase/ installation of PLC hardware, panels, electrical components, etc. 93 K:\WPB_Civil\General\Black\Florida\IRCU\Oslo - PLC Part A\20210325 - Scope - Oslo PLC Part A Scope.docx Page 3 of 5 i ITEMS FURNISHED BY OWNER i The following items will be furnished, by the Owner and are necessary for completion of the tasks described herein. • Access to WTP site • Panel record drawings • Coordination during programming and integration FEESCHEDULE We will provide these services in accordance with our Continuing Consulting Engineering Services Agreement for Professional Services dated April 17th, 2018, by and between INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Florida ("COUNTY") and Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc., ("Consultant"). The Consultant will provide professional services for a lump sum fee as follows: Task No. i Task Task Fee Task 1 Design Phase I $ 7,623 Task 2 Bid Phase ' $ 2,879 Task 3 Construction Phase $ 12,516 Task 4 Programming and Integration $110,866 c TOTAL LUMP SUM FEE 1 $133,884 94 K:\WPB_Civil\General\Black\Florida\IRCU\Oslo - PLC Part A\20210325 - Scope - Oslo PLC Part A Scope.docx Page 4 of 5 kn �o V) 0o v3 in o0 » 0000 69 7�W r b9 M 69 W 69 �O 00 b9 O `^ V V Oo F" 6�9 69 69 69 69 �j 0 69 m tM.l EA 6M9 -It 69 00 6M9 69 6M9 In fA yrj 69 6�9 O � Q I to Vi O 1 In Ww (n 6q O — — — C N o U F , �, rj T I viw� 1 j j U z — ¢ z � ly Q O N F a Q — — — — I — H U N M N •-- •-- M •--� N N r •r M N � D\ c jc W J F E C Cr 00 S tz o! ¢ Q cn F z �o rn TI cn o E� z Sam p �� a 6 V 0 5 0 � o z x �a�cL :-o s �o 3� .6 a3 zxQrN¢� �3 C) o x AU 8 UU 41u) cz aU U U cmUo cnUU Consent Item�Y" Indian River County, Florida Department of Utility Services Board Memorandum Date: April 1, 2021 To: Jason E. Brown, County Administrator From: Vincent Burke, PE, Director of Utility Services Through: Jennifer Hyde, Purchasing Manager Prepared by: Duke Hawkins, Assistant Operations Manager, Utility Services Subject: Change Order to Boromei Construction, Inc., for Data Flow System Antenna and Tower Replacement Background/Analysis: Indian River County Department of Utility Services (IRCDUS) uses Data Flow Systems to monitor and control 350 sewage lift stations. The communication system consists of three (3) polling loops located at Kings Tank, Roseland Tank, and the West Regional Wastewater Treatment Facility (WWTF). The West Regional WWTF antenna and tower were installed in 1996 to serve as the southwest forwarding terminal unit (FTU). The antenna and tower needed to be replaced. On September 15, 2020, Bid #2020049 was awarded to Boromei Construction, Inc., (Boromei) from Okeechobee, FL, as the second lowest responsive, responsible bidder, for a total bid price in the amount of $109,663.00. The notice to proceed (NTP) was issued on November 6, 2020. Boromei Construction, Inc., submitted a proposed Change Order #1 for $4,500.00 to cover the post material inspection/post construction inspection' (PMI/PCI). This is a requirement per Indian River County Building Department Permit #2020111489. This was an unforeseen requirement that was not accounted:for in the bid. At this time, we are requesting a change order to Bid #2020049 with Boromei Construction, Inc. in the amount of $4,500.00 for a PMI/PCI. Funding: Funds for this project of $4,500.00 are derived from the Data Flow Antenna Replacement account in the Utilities Operating Fund. Utilities operating funds are generated from water and sewer sales. Description Account Number Amount Data Flow Antenna Replacement 47126836-044699-19547 $4,500.00 F:\Utilities\00_UTILITY - AGENDA TEMPLATE & GUIDELINES\2021 Agenda Items\042021 Data Flow Tower\Agenda-Data Flow Page 1 of 2 Tower Change Order 1_21-0407.Doc 96 Recommendation: Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners approves the change order to Bid #2020049 with Boromei Construction, Inc., in the amount of $4,500.00, and authorize the Chairman to execute the change order on their behalf. Attachment: 1. Change Order to Proposal F:\Utilities\00_UTILITY - AGENDA TEMPLATE & GUIDELINES\2021 Agenda Items\042021 Data Flow Tower\Agenda-Data Flow Tower Change �7 Orderl_21-0407.Doc 7 Qoromei Construction. CHANGE ORDER PROJECT: Iridian River County CHANGE ORDER NUMBER: 1 Name, address) 1800 27th St. DATE: 3.25 .2021 Vero Beach, FL OWNER'S PROJECT NO: 2020049 i CONTRACT DATE: 9.22.2020 CONTRACTOR: Borornei Construction, Inc. CONTRACT FOR: Name, address) 420B NW 3rd St. Okeechobee, FL 34972 The Contract is changed as follows: The addition of costs for inspection fees. ! I Boromei Construction, Inc i $ 4,500.00 i The original Contract Sum) (Guaranteed Maximum Price) was $ 109,663.00 Net change by previously authorized Change Orders $ The (Contract Sum) (Guaranteed Maximum Price) prior to this Change Order was $ 109,663.00 i The (Contract Sum) (Guaranteed Maximum Price) will be (increased) (decreased) (unchanged) by this Change Order in the amount of , $ 4,500.00 The new (Contract Sum) (Guaranteed Maximum Price) including this Change Order will be $ 114,163.00 The Contract Time will be (increased) (decreased) (unchanged) by O days. The date of Final Completion as of the date of this Change Order therefore is NOTE This summary does not reflect changes in the Contract Sum, Contract Time or Guaranteed Maximum Price which have been authorized by Construction Change Directive. I CONTRACTOR OWNER: Boromei Construction, Inc. Indian River County Address Address 420B NW 3rd St. 1800 27th St. ; Okeechobee. FL 34972 Vero Beach, FL 32960 J BY BY DATE DATE i I M., MEMORANDUM TO: Board of County Commissioners FROM: Dylan Reingold, County Attorney DATE: April 9, 2021 SUBJECT: 16th Street Ballfields Release of Right of Entry and Reservation of Mineral Rights BACKGROUND. As part of the donation of the 16th Street Ballfields from the Jimmy Graves Foundation/Sports Complex to the School District, the School District has requested the County to release any right, reservation, title or interest it may have to any phosphate, metal, mineral, and petroleum interests on the property pursuant to section 270.11, Florida Statutes. In exchange, the School District has agreed that the School District of Indian River County, its heirs, successors and assigns, will not mine for any phosphate, metal, mineral, or petroleum on the property. The County Attorney's Office and the attorneys for the School District have drafted the attached release setting forth this agreement. FUNDING. There is no funding associated with this matter. RECOMMENDATION. The County Attorney's Office recommends that the Board approve the Release of Right of Entry and Reservation of Mineral Rights and authorize the, Chair to execute the Release after final review and approval by the County Attorney. ATTACHMENTS. Draft Release of Right of Entry and Reservation of Mineral Rights. 99 PREPARED BY AND RETURN TO: Catherine D. Reischmann, Esq. Garganese, Weiss, D'Agresta & Salzman, P.A. P.O. Box 2873 Orlando, FL 32802-2873 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA RELEASE OF RIGHT OF ENTRY AND RESERVATION OF MINERAL RIGHTS KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: that INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, a Florida political subdivision, does hereby release any right, reservation, title or interest it may have to any phosphate, metal, mineral, and petroleum interests pursuant to §270.11, Florida Statutes, insofar as said reservations affects the following described lands lying and being in Indian River County, Florida: SEE EXHIBIT "A" ATTACHED HERETO. In exchange, the SCHOOL BOARD OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, a Florida political subdivision, hereby covenants and agrees that the School Board of Indian River County, its heirs, successors and assigns, will not mine for any phosphate, metal, mineral, or petroleum on the property described in Exhibit "A". below. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Release as of the date indicated [signature pages to follow] 100 ATTEST: Jeffrey R. Smith, Clerk of Courts And Comptroller By: Deputy Clerk (SEAL) Approved as to form and legal sufficiency: Dylan Reingold, County Attorney INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS By: Joseph E. Flescher, Chairman Approved by BCC: Approved as to conforming to County policy: Jason E. Brown, County Administrator 101 1 i WITNESSES: SCHOOL BOARD OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, a Florida political subdivision By: David K. Moore, Ed. D., Superintendent (print) Date: (print) STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF INDIAN RIVER The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me by means of ❑ physical presence or ❑ online notarization, this day of , 2021, by David K. Moore, Ed. D., Superintendent of the School Board of Indian River County, Florida, (check one) ❑ who is personally known to me or ❑ who produced as identification. Notary Public — State of Florida Print Name: My Commission expires: 102 EXHIBIT "A" Commence at the Southwest corner of the Southeast 1/4 of said Section 2, Township 33 South, Range 39 East, Indian River County, Florida; thence run North 00 degrees 02 minutes 39 seconds East, along the West line of the Southeast 1/4 of Section 2, a distance of 80.00 feet to a point on the Westerly extension of the North right of way line of 16th street; thence run South 89 degrees 40 minutes 13 seconds East along said Westerly extension, a distance of 80.00 feet to the East right of way line of 20th Avenue, for a Point of Beginning; thence run along said East right of way line of 20th Avenue, North 00 degrees 02 minutes 39 seconds East, parallel with and 80.00 feet East of the West line of the Southeast 1/4 of said Section 2, a distance of 650.41 feet; thence departing said East right of way line, run South 89 degrees 25 minutes 35 seconds East, a distance of 373.62 feet; thence run South 00 degrees 10 minutes 11 seconds West, a distance of 48.55 feet; thence run South 89 degrees 43 minutes 15 seconds East, a distance of 243.87 feet; thence run South 00 degrees 14 minutes 16 seconds West, a distance of 136.70 feet; thence run South 89 degrees 48 minutes 41 seconds East a distance of 250.00 feet to a point on the West right of way line of 17th Avenue; thence run South 00 degrees 36 minutes 02 seconds West, along said West right of way line, a distance of 464.40 feet to a point on the North right of way line of 16th street; thence departing said West right of way line, run North 89 degrees 40 minutes 13 seconds West along said North right of way line, parallel with and 80.00 feet North of the South line of the Southeast 1/4 of said Section 2, a distance of 862.40 feet to the Point of Beginning. LESS AND EXCEPT that portion of the above described property which is noted on the survey as IRC EMERGENCY SVCS DIST PARCEL and being more particularly described as follows: A proper legal description and survey prepared by a licensed Florida registered land surveyor should be provided for review for Indian River Property Appraiser's Parcel 433390200000700000001.0 103 S. k. CONSENT AGENDA INDIAN RIVER COUNTY INTER -OFFICE MEMORANDUM OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET TO: Members of the Board of County Commissioners DATE: April 14, 2021 SUBJECT: Florida Department of Law Enforcement FY2020 Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant (JAG) Program FROM: Kristin Daniels Director, Management and Budget DESCRIPTIONS AND CONDITIONS Indian River County has been notified by the Florida Department of Law Enforcement (FDLE), Office of Criminal Justice Grants, that $51,033 has been allocated in grant funds for FY 2020 Justice Assistance Grant Countywide (JAGC). RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners authorize Chairman Joseph E. Flescher to execute the Certificate of Participation. 104 Fiscal Year 20201JAGC Allocations County Allocation County Allocation Alachua $71,953 Lake $78,204 Baker $23,107 Lee $162,684 Bay $81,291 Leon $90,077 Bradford $34,834 Levy $32,005 Brevard $131,689 Liberty $19,848 Broward $348,691 Madison $41,934 Calhoun $19,708 I Manatee $103,811 Charlotte $58,368 ! Marion $84,659 Citrus $39,679 Martin $53,186 Clay $48,611 Monroe $55,199 Collier $84,138 Nassau $39,917 Columbia $38,642 Okaloosa $67,078 Dade $551,650 Okeechobee $58,352 Desoto $32,596 Orange $292,766 Dixie $23,274 Osceola $82,691 Duval $239,400 Palm Beach $277,983 Escambia $105,334 Pasco $106,511 Flagler $35,748 I Pinellas $236,358 Franklin $34,832 1 Polk $168,323 Gadsden $24,390 Putnam $60,054 Gilchrist $18,687 i Santa Rosa $43,333 Glades $14,806 ! Sarasota $94,379 Gulf $37,527 Seminole $112,827 Hamilton $43,393 4 St. Johns $53,560 Hardee $34,432 r St. Lucie $79,881 Hendry $64,820 Sumter $43,990 Hernando $49,480 Suwannee $31,137 Highlands $50,648 Taylor $34,417 Hillsborough $288,815 Union $13,424 Holmes $23,446 ; Volusia $129,365 Indian River $51,033 Wakulla $19,840 Jackson $23,355 Walton $28,161 Jefferson $29,627 Washington $26,060 Lafayette $19,206 I Total JAGC $5,599,224 105 I CERTIFICATE OF ,PARTICIPATION Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Gant (JAG) Program Mr. Cody Menacof Office of Criminal Justice Grants Florida Department of Law Enforcement 2331 Phillips Road Tallahassee, Florida 32308 Dear Mr. Menacof: This letter provides notification that the i I County Board of Commissioners Accepts Declines to serve as the coordinating unit of government for the Florida Department of Lwet Enforcement's Edward Byrne Memorial Justice'Assistance Grant (JAG) Countywide Program. I understand, for the purposes of the JAG Countywide Program, the county can only request and approve applications for eligible subrecipients. In order to meet eligibility requirements, the county, and each organization or agency identified through the 51 % planning process (as provided by Florida Administrative Code, Chapter 11 D-9.002), must be able to document compliance with the following requirements prior to receiving a subaward: f • 2 C.F.R. Part 25—Universal Identifier and System for Award Management (SAM) Requirements • 8 U.S.0 §1373 & 1644—Communication Between Governments and the Immigration and Naturalization Service • 28 C.F.R. Part 42—Nondiscrimination; Equal Employment Opportunity; Policies and Procedures • 2 C.F.R. §200.318-326—Federal Procurement Standards • 2 C.F.R Part 200.300-309—Standards for Financial and Program Management For purposes of coordinating the preparation of application(s) for grant funds with the Office of Criminal Justice Grants, the following individual is designated as County Coordinator for the county's FY20 JAG Countywide subawards: i Name: ; Agency: Title: I� Address: Email: + City: Phone: +; zip: i f I acknowledge and understand the responsibility placed upon the county to ensure grant funds are used for improving criminal justice and subawards, as identified through the 51% process, are only approved to eligible subrecipients. Sincerely, Chair County Board of Commissioners 106 Rule Reference 11D-9.006 OCJG-024 (Rev. March 202 1) INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA MEMORANDUM TO: Jason E. Brown; County Administrator THROUGH: Phillip J. Matson, AICP; Community Development Director THROUGH: Ryan Sweeney; Chief, Current Development FROM: John Stoll; Senior Planner, Current Development DATE: April 9, 2021 SUBJECT: Florida Power & Light Company's Request for Major Site Plan and Special Exception Use Approval for a Private Heavy Utility (FPL Grove Solar Energy Center) (SP -SE -21-02-04 / 2020090097-885531 It is requested that the data herein presented be given formal consideration by the Board of County Commissioners (BCC) at its regular meeting of April 20, 2021. DESCRIPTION & CONDITIONS Lucido & Associates, on behalf of Florida Power & Light Company (FPL), have submitted an application for major site plan and special exception use approval to construct a private heavy utility (FPL Grove Solar Energy Center). The subject site is approximately 579.68 acres in size and is located at the southwest corner of Oslo Road (91h Street SW) and 162"d Avenue SW (see attachment 1). The site is zoned A-2, Agricultural -2 (up to 1 unit per 10 acres), a zoning district in which special exception use approval is required for private heavy utilities (including solar energy centers). The proposed solar energy center will consist of solar panel arrays, stabilized access pathways, and a collector yard (see attachment 4). Planning and Zoning Commission (PZC) Recommendation: This item was originally scheduled for a public hearing by the PZC on April 8, 2021. Due to a lack of a quorum, the public hearing was opened and continued to a special call meeting on April 15, 2021. Staff will provide the PZC's recommendation to the Board of County Commissioners (BCC) during the public hearing scheduled for the regular BCC meeting of April 20, 2021. Board of County Commissioners (BCC) Review: The BCC now needs to consider the special exception use request for the proposed private heavy utility (solar energy center), conduct a public hearing, and make a recommendation to approve, approve with conditions, or deny the request. Pursuant to Section 971.05 of the LDRs, the BCC is to consider the appropriateness of the requested use for the subject site and compatibility of the use with the surrounding area. The BCC may recommend reasonable conditions and safeguards necessary to mitigate impacts and to ensure compatibility of the use with the surrounding area. 107 ANALYSIS 1. Size of Development: 2. Zoning Classification: 3. Land Use Designation: 4. Impervious Area: 5. Open Space: 579.68 acres A-2, Agricultural -2 (up to 1 unit per 10 acres) AG -2, Agricultural -2 (up to 1 unit per 10 acres) Proposed: 1,217,375 square feet or 27.95 acres Required: 80% Proposed: 95% Note: The solar arrays are post -mounted above the existing grade (i.e. the existing ground level), which will remain unaltered underneath the arrays. The open ground underneath the arrays is considered open space. 6. Traffic Circulation: The project site is split into two equal halves by the north/south St. Johns Improvement District (SJID) canal #S-8, and that canal will remain in place (see attachment 4). Therefore, access to the eastern half of the project site will be provided via an existing driveway connection to Oslo Road immediately east of canal #S-8, and access to the western half will be provided via an existing driveway connection immediately west of canal #S-8. The proposed site layout includes a modified grid network of 16' to 20' wide stabilized access pathways to allow maintenance vehicles access throughout the site. Based on the project's low traffic generation, a traffic impact study was not required. However, a County right-of-way (ROW) permit will be required for any heavy loads utilizing County ROW during project construction. Also, based on the project location and the status/ownership of the adjacent rights-of-way, right-of-way dedications are not required for the subject project. None of the adjacent rights-of-way are owned or maintained by the County. The project's driveway locations, design, and internal circulation plan have been reviewed and approved by Traffic Engineering and Fire Prevention. 7. Off -Street Parking: The subject site will be an unmanned, restricted access solar energy center, and will be accessed only by authorized maintenance crews on an infrequent basis. The LDRs do not require permanent off-street parking spaces for such uses. The proposed site layout provides adequate space for maintenance vehicles to maneuver and park within the site. Therefore, the project site plan provides sufficient parking area on-site. 8. Landscape Requirements: Based on the site's location, the project layout, and the type of proposed improvements, the Community Development Director has agreed to reduce most of the project's landscape requirements per Section 926.05(8) of the County LDRs. However, the project is required to provide a total of 30 drought -tolerant canopy trees along the east, west and south perimeters of the collector yard. The project's landscape plan shows the required landscape improvements, and those landscape improvements shall be installed prior to the issuance of a project certificate of occupancy (C.O.). Environmental Issues: During recent environmental surveying of the project site, a crested caracara nest was located immediately south of the project site. Therefore, the site has been designed to accommodate a 985 -foot buffer around the caracara nest (see attachment 41.08o solar panels, collector yard improvements, or battery storage will be located within the 985 - foot caracara nest buffer, and the applicant will be required to obtain all required environmental agency permits (e.g. USFWS), prior to site plan release. No other environmental issues exist on the project site. 10. Stormwater Management: The applicant submitted a preliminary stormwater management plan that has been reviewed and approved by Public Works. That plan proposes to utilize the existing grove furrows/ditches to convey and treat the minimal amount of stormwater runoff that will be generated by the project. Prior to site plan release, the applicant must obtain a County Type `B" Stormwater Permit pursuant to Chapter 930 of the County LDRs. 11. Utilities: The project will be an unmanned facility, and does not include any proposed restroom facilities at this time. Therefore, no well or septic permits are required or proposed at this time, and any future restroom facilities would require well and septic permits from the Department of Health and a minor staff -level amendment to the site plan. The County Department of Utility Services and the Department of Health have reviewed and approved the proposed site plan. 12. Extended Roadway Grid Network: Per Policy 3.8 of the Transportation Element of the County Comprehensive Plan, the County must consider protection of the extended roadway grid network during the site plan review and approval process. The applicant has provided an extended roadway grid network exhibit showing all potential extended roads that may cross the site at some time in the future (9th Street SW/Oslo Road, 13th Street SW, 17th Street SW, and 162nd Avenue SW). Please see attachment Q. The provided exhibit shows an alternate corridor alignment for two potential extended road locations (13th Street SW and 17th Street SW). That alternate alignment corresponds with the proposed on-site stabilized access paths, and is clear of proposed solar panel arrays. Staff has reviewed the proposed alternate corridor alignment and has confirmed that the alignment provides adequate protection for the extended roadway grid network, as shown on the project site plan. 13. Specific Land Use Criteria: Pursuant to LDR section 971.44(2), the following criteria for private heavy utilities apply to this project: Per Chapter 901, the definition of utilities, public and private — heavy includes "all major electrical generation plants (generating fifty (50) megawatts or more), major sewage treatment and disposal facilities, and major water purification plants; " Note: The proposed use (FPL Grove Solar Energy Center) will generate 74.5 megawatts of power and meets the definition of a private heavy utility. 2. Any power generation facility shall be consistent with the provisions of the Florida Electrical Power Plan Citing Act, Chapter 23, Section 23.09191 F. S.; Note: The proposed solar energy center will have a maximum gross capacity of 74.5 megawatts which is less than the 75 megawatt threshold. The proposed facility is therefore exempt from the Florida Electrical Power Plant Siting Act. 3. All below -ground high voltage cables within a utility right-of-way shall be made known to the public through the use of signs posted therein; 109 Note: There are no proposed below -ground high voltage cables within a utility right-of-way. Therefore, the above referenced signage criteria do not apply to the subject project. It should be noted that "high voltage" warning signs will be provided in English and Spanish along the perimeter security fence of the collector yard. 4. The disposal of all waste, gaseous, liquid or solid, shall comply with all federal, state and local laws; Note: It is anticipated that no hazardous or toxic waste will be generated by the proposed project. The applicant has acknowledged that if there is any disposal of waste, gaseous, liquid, or solid, such disposal will comply with all federal, state, and local laws. S. Between all above -ground facilities, (except distribution and collection facilities) and adjacent properties having a residential land use designation, a Type 'A" buffer (reduce to "B" buffer where abutting a local roadway, reduce to "C" buffer where abutting a Thoroughfare Plan roadway) (with six-foot opaque screening) as specified in Chapter 926, Landscaping shall be provided; Note: All of the adjacent properties have an AG -2, Agricultural -2 (up to 1 unit per 10 acres) agricultural land use designation, and no adjacent property has a residential land use designation. Therefore, the above referenced landscape buffer requirements do not apply to the subject project. 6. In all zoning districts except the industrial districts, all equipment, machinery, and facilities which cannot, by their size or nature, be located within an enclosed building shall be separated from adjacent properties having a residential land use designation by a Type "C" buffer (with six-foot opaque screening) as specified in Chapter 926, Landscaping; Note: As described in item 5 above, all of the adjacent properties have an AG - 2, Agricultural -2 (up to 1 unit per 10 acres) agricultural land use designation, not a residential land use designation. Therefore, the above referenced landscape buffer requirements do not apply to the subject project. 7. Driveways located in close proximity to adjacent properties having a residential land use designation shall provide a six-foot opaque screening between the driveway and adjacent property. An eight foot opaque screen may be required if deemed necessary to mitigate noise and visual impacts. Note: As described in item 5 above, all of the adjacent properties have an AG -2, Agricultural -2 (up to 1 unit per 10 acres) agricultural land use designation, not a residential land use designation. Therefore, the above referenced driveway screening requirements do not apply to the subject project. 110 14. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: North: Oslo RD/ SJID Canal, Citrus Groves / A-2 East: SJID Canal/Citrus Groves / A-2 South: 17th Street SW, Citrus Groves / A-2 West: Vacant / A-2 All conditions recommended by staff have been accepted by the applicant. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the BCC grant major site plan and special exception use approval for a private heavy utility facility (solar energy center) to be known as FPL Grove Solar Energy Center with the following conditions: 1. Prior to site plan release, the applicant shall obtain all required environmental agency permits related to the nearby crested caracara nest. 2. The applicant shall obtain a County right -.of --way (ROW) permit for any heavy loads utilizing County ROW during project construction. 3. Prior to issuance of a project certificate -of occupancy (C.O.), the applicant shall install all required landscape improvements as shown on the approved project landscape plan. ATTACHMENTS 1. Location Map 2. Extended Roadway Grid Network Exhibit 3. Aerial 4. Site Plan 111 I i MS anuanV puZ91 iJ � I i ' � N N I i N bA I N � w O E E U O e N N e z r 9s' W a F§ fat if d d D m ow c o R S g ii -- - - - - - - - - - -- -------------- - - - - ----------------- - - - - -- -------- - - - - �� - -- -- - - - - �f -- -- -------------- - - - - -- - - •as •uoa F oaura nu,"aism EAE "a"i,llY�'333(Ol:" mm�ru�znxn ,vuc oue �@y gg � W i13MOdtl4R101i b31N3� l,'J213N3 Ntl105 3/�02191dd gY� v x sgo3e� AM/dWOJ1H9fl------------------------------------------------ U Q Z Illllll w I it i ,i 1 o vii � :•ir }I � w w F - I w I �� r` I ; t� Ii I' I I � IF 1 L__ ----------------- .. __. --------------------- lilt i ------------------------ -----------------------� i i ::- i13MOdtl4R101i b31N3� l,'J213N3 Ntl105 3/�02191dd N O N O f O � o � � n O I O rD �D N c� r� n CD O O cn cn e I w, I CD CD CD CD CD CD _0 CD CD CD i �r CD e --r CD i N c� r� n CD O O cn cn r r 162"d Avenue r __ w1 i T Li � r n a 122nd Avenue z " oro 0 P N GQa IF !(IT, 'n w � r C (D fD 71 El Avenue JHTHAV -. 98TNhV CD •�. V..r..•.v... . 3 � N J 24 p .P� r 0 0 1 ... .. .... ..._ o r , - �t�iF.tirBrw�. ,Y,�. �. vYx ..«..... ; '��- •� �i^^..l^�iS +b�'b"5Y&^,S„'p'?Li^"M,.^�*"m�*.a.nw..:cw`Aawne+nawamu��.«�w �', . ' AS 1 fit. FRR Ifil CL MEOW 1 -J J i g{ 11JJ i 1 $ 1- 1- iw� Y { IS 1�<G k'.r kx � di, ad S "W}6 C y �"§ t K.r �� frc. 4 hili j� f tij �{.I>r). h,�r $3Y '� �i � 5x.�,`�, t 13 �a��,ky'Y,l =aYYkid"%yM P W, '}: }�.�`Mky,�i9 P .1 �r 1.1 '4T, � 4 'k! �Cix 4,�Rj� }S' � %9yf '"i rys• }� „�+C, ,V.�� 1. � j�� r4dq•Y i � �� 'F FY. +p i ,r�1x � Y 2i�� i f' Y{,• '�.y "�`t ?'C� �'�1� f y�� •�i+`�Y2� 1 Y�% -�, rl '� L .Po-`. a� �y Lrt_vZf Fi A �ik�'(¢`�Il� g 155 Y''_ a Yr ^�F t ! res 1} �� P-41 Mv'. �� i I• } .� .Y 4 81'Vt �� i`3t' i A. �, a• �� +�.� Sfi'}''' F'1�... %�`4 O'� �'�RT Ya �`�Y „„�l 'J f,r.i1 k£�a '� `�.„ yP1 "'e".�'yv i NO dzr „y 3 �� ' �- t�'x. z, y''f 9 a� �t?..:-'t �" re '°�''i. an.p �.�x � fix, h Y "t•'�.,x, ::{, BMW Ml 1 vX. 5�N � Yit AW £ . IIIA � � ( �y `�#-.a !°i �S'�' �`X y� b � �;r ri ll � 3� �' S'�". '' �`",`x6 M" '}fi'i' • ay � `"y�� a� j � . — _ �I liii 12'I :if 2 - ii rl i -J J i g{ tiaMhrz�s a't SII}I r 11 , lrfr# ti qj f f a I�r3jf£>3 j ii 0 l'� ff flf af� t# -'far 3 Fg� a g t : Li gf � r z`x 'aI;aila -1t zsMs2{".. CD eC/—f- IFI¢rjj_E I r %`I # Fr } H+ - iilq �s Z a l€ a JO a = r to a �"{ !"'L• 1-.I 3 3' f,33'.j ?I fY F -f s a.3{f�tg 311 P" r �� r j'fr Ifs# /° r- tj 3,` sp r1#Yra aa3 f � P�cF i i a l��ilt�l t r ; � � rt �zn rra s t�°p x# s a7tri Pa t' r 3 t 1 f t� r ��tr air y atssx �a��x+ IE`i ,I¢� � fl � rr� ��sa1 Idj� t .' � a�1 j i3q j ) 4, UD, r'f II<Tal fri, t' cn €sa; =ai', la'# t 3 � ➢p(v g II iYa dk �Tr i riff ' I €ha;f is ;� ajTs 1 i; a r Ili ira � t Y r I,r I f Ef €Jl f€F_' M tee+ cr .�j f li a I i }a/I f u'�s� ° /� r �y pa tF j�Fr a�, s _ 0 '`ir,l tri +�tir 1 r t i a, I �F a •' t- EIa � � :F F t f1 f a - t t f r "aft ' ife73da f.rf t �t � llf.`'1 Pln `' 1 I � I I I • I 3S"£ �� "T `f amt %+'� d g £�. d • V �i 1?2�S ig•< . Xa't g '_ �.-p yi �, �t�(% � 5p� �l y,Fi� x+iq' g � �r S • E ,4 Y f�f �' F. Y 5 §£^ ,x 'fie-z5'-Y fgg �Y F 'I i 4 c "* � 'Arg "� ;� .❑ �. � ��".�f {��_: °� — `r'k 0 F--F� CD c --r CD CD O• O p CD CD CD, CD U4 CD O CD CD r CD CD CD 0 g O'll i 3 O con CL a O p CD r ♦ I m t j t'l n L 20 co 1 { i rMIL CL m NY 1 '�. � �, I , � �.. a •. � Of - + 1 i 1 I ro CD- cn o CD,' CD Cn l 0 0 o —n- �� '0 r -4 - Az >o v 'RP I -n RR k4 CD 0 (D % mn lrj IN 0 OA "' I rIJ V, It 2 &0 0- 0 (D rIJ V, It 2 &0 0- Tq, 115-1-1 I s ("� -015- 1�) t � k Y � , � o a - def t w � Q 4 m s � i d x� ("� -015- 1�) i ~s ° LI + _- ....". ryyAlT ewrornr I li Pa a� U e Via. iCD P, B 9 $ . Y ° °gpp "fid N � 4 � ^ q7�c�d HF ng g iD C .c lt Xe °F Rm 8 -P b �» y � F4;R7 A r pn!i m MRMa�� a Rm 8 MT S m x $ 114 ��g p F �; r g ..flip:FSS �R y � F4;R7 A r pn!i m ,B � Rm MT m 114 ��g p 5 FPL GROVE NfEiI R a c a £ 'S" ENERGY CE"� 1 "* °"•` _ P flARW MATR 6 LW COMPANY Jacobs ' R] � O�. �• rNA LormM OVA6f00T, R.� �' "y'�t. o :s0 � RV fMT rnrrenanomttn 110f0AriVTnlrrOr �U lf!! w...aw..,er 0 b Io 3� I I 7 d �oN a IH �mw I i yx4-�" �06b SMO 4JW' p1. IMP Rik r in $TO 111 �w t f 3 k �pir; E yQp Hyyl tpp N Q 3z ��<g +Zn yp� sY nNCAO vi U-0 1 u�-' E 3°e� T 'boar7�6 !a - i'n1:n'i t £ a f�Ti $ nt X1 Rt kw k a g 4 � C 0 1 n a 1 x ¢�^+ ,mfr 4x1 �� alto 0 poF SAN, Hxm f� l4A g; QjjjL}}J�, ^ pA SIR •!F 444 `v. _ .Y K w �all i x. � icl yam.'° • ° 1 j � ,ay�..� � .i Oct un two 0 1 1 ii -9 3, � I s^ If I I C1 C � � fi'►,C" c . til 1 1 ii -9 3, W • 1 h-1 • • . • • I s t • } .. . r ... . �W 0 o aum r* 0 .� mat -.. 0 0 � (Ar I ■ m CCD my \ 0 ■ 11-116-x FRI '�g_ ins-zr 'fig ,I -as � ses°telp". PART Or. TH E'USA TODAY NETWORK Indian River Press Journal 1801 U.S. 1, Vero Beach, FL 32960 AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION Attn: Kathy Charest INDIAN RIVER COUNTY PLANNING 1801 27 TH STREET VERO BEACH, FL 32960 STATE OF WISCONSIN COUNTY OF BROWN Before the undersigned authority personally appeared, said legal clerk, who on oath says that he/she is a legal clerk of the Indian River Press Journal, a daily newspaper published at Vero Beach In Indian River County, Florida: that the attached copy of advertisement was published in the Indian River Press Journal in the following issues below. Affiant further says that the said Indian River Press Journal is a newspaper published in Vero Beach in said Indian River County, Florida, and that said newspaper has heretofore been continuously published in said Indian River County, Florida, daily and distributed in Indian River County, Florida, for a period of one year next preceding the first publication of the attached copy of advertisement; and affiant' further says that she has neither paid or promised any person, firm or corporation any discount, rebate, commission or refund for the purpose of securing this advertisement for publication in the said newspaper. The Indian River Press Journal has been entered as Periodical Matter at the Post Offices in Vero Beach, Indian River County, Florida and has been for a period of one year next preceding the first publication of the attached copy of advertisement. 04/04/2021 t. Subscribed and W ti. to before on April 4, 2021 Notary, State of WI, County of Brown TAI=iA Mo NDL(-)(: H NO°Lary Pul.-ilir.. Strata of Wisconsin My commission expires August 6, 2021 Publication Cost: $191.52 Ad No: 0004653396 Customer No: 1310785 PO #: # of Affidavits2 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING - SPECIAL EXCEPTION USE This is notice of a publit`hearing of the Indian River County goard,of County Commissioners to consider grantirtg'speciai ex. sept{orf, use a- Val for the constructioh of an F :L electrical al facilityy (solar farm) to be located a ,16255, 9th Street, 3W;'Sectlon 29; `Township 335, Range 37E.:Please seethe attach. - ed location map. A.pubiic hearing, atwhich will antl-citizdns sh'Ali hava ail opportunity to tie heard, will be held bye thb Board of County:.Corr mmissioneof Iridian .River County, � lori'da, In the County Commission Chambers of the Coun ' Atlministration 8u�lding, ,located at 1801 27th Street, Vero Beach, 'Florida ;on Tuesday, April 20. 2021. at9 00 a;in: ,Please clkect.p'lahning related questions to the Current Develop= merit Pl6nning;Sectwn at9:772 2f•1690. All -documents pertarn� ing ;to !his reqquest are 4n file in the india.n River County Plan - Hing DIvisiori,;located at 1$01 27th:Street wfthrn building A" of the "County Administration tbmplex, Documents. may here viewed liy member's of.thc,public:durfng normal busihess hours: All members ofthe public are'invited to attend and parti6pate in the public hearing. Anyone who may wish to, appeal= any decision, whichmay be made at this nnockiri vol riiCod to ensure that a verbatim re- t ortl.;of the pcoGe dintls is made ,.-which includes testimony and evidence'uparrwhich t c appeal is bawds ANYONE WHO NEEDS A SPECIAL ACCOmMODATiON FOR THIS MEETING MUST CONTACT THE`CQUNTY'S' AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT (ADA) COORDINATOR Ar 22 U- 3 AT LEAST 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE OF THE MEETING. INDIAN RIVER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS BY -s- Joseph E. Flescher, Chairman `O I Publish: April 4, 2021 TCN4653396 10. A. b 2—M INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA MEMORANDUM TO: Jason E. Brown; County Administrator THROUGH: Phillip J. Matson, AICP; Community Development Director THROUGH: Bill Schutt, AICP; Chief, Long Range Planning FROM: Matt Kalap; Planner, Long Range Planning DATE: April 12, 2021 RE: Sunnyside Up 1, LLC's Request to Rezone Approximately ±40.25 Acres Located North of the Indian River Mall, Between 66th and 58th Avenues and, South of 261h Street from PDTND, Planned Development Traditional Neighborhood Design to RM -8, Multiple Family Residential District (up to 8 units/acre) (RZON2008050077-88741) [Quasi -Judicial] It is requested that the following information be given formal consideration by the Indian River County Board of County Commissioners (BCC) at its regular meeting of April 20" 2021. DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS This request is to rezone ±40.25 acres located south of and adjacent to 26th street approximately ±775 feet east of 66th avenue and approximately ±700 feet west of 58th avenue and north of the Indian River Mall, from PDTND, Planned Development Traditional Neighborhood Design, to RM -8, Multiple Family Residential District (up to 8 units per acre). The purpose of this request is to secure the zoning necessary to develop the ±40.25 acre site at a density consistent with the density allowed by the site's comprehensive plan land use designation. The subject site is depicted in the image below (Figure 1). Fieure 1 - Existine Zoniniz Man Denictine Subiect Site 0 Is ME �M = uimtrl �� ►s nwmnn uu n : r. - nnrmfiii . \+►��a� �� gmnmm- . ` IM -1 mar � a �amr u = . p. _ =_ imuniuimmu► ��o�'xnm rwh��giu' p� $ . . it ' i . /,Gitl!IIIIIunmuueintmr' �innmm�rt,► � � � IIaIIIII wuu uuum 116 Planning and Zoning Commission Action On March 11th 2021 a public hearing to consider this rezoning request was held before the Indian River County Planning and Zoning Commission (PZC). There were multiple interested individuals from the community in attendance. Five of whom, from the Woodfield Planned Development, spoke and expressed concerns regarding potential impact from construction activities, impacts of new trips (traffic) and, aesthetics once a use is developed on the site. A petition from the Woodfield Planned Development signed by approximately 150 residents was also presented that expressed concerns related to traffic and construction anticipated from potential development of the site (petition on file in the Community Development Department). At the public hearing the PZC listened to and acknowledged the concerns from the public. Clarification was provided regarding the rezoning process and the fact that. there is no site plan proposed as part of the rezoning. Clarification was also provided that any future proposed site plan will be reviewed by the County and at that time site design, impact on roadways, and construction issues would be reviewed/considered. The PZC offered to have staff notify those interested via e- mail when a site plan proposal is submitted for review. After taking and considering public comment, the PZC voted 5 - 0 to recommend that the Board of County Commissioners approve the rezoning request. For reference, the March 11th 2021 PZC minutes are included as Attachment 3 to this report Existing Land Use Pattern As shown in Figure 2, the properties surrounding the subject site consists of the Indian River Mall, natural/vegetated area (under a conservation easement), commercial retail uses, multiple -family residential uses, and single-family residential -uses. Additionally, the subject site is in close proximity to employment opportunities that are within the State Road 60 and 66' Avenue Commercial/Industrial node. The subject site contains five separate vacant parcels each of which are vegetated with native and invasive vegetation. Figures 3 and 4 show that the parcels directly to the south of the subject site are currently zoned A-1, Agricultural District (up to 1 unit per 5 acres); RM -6, Multiple Family Residential District (up to 6 units per acre); RS -6, Single Family Residential District (up to 6 units per acre); and CG, General Commercial District, which includes the Indian River Mall. Parcels directly to the east are zoned RS -6, Single Family Residential District (up to 6 units per acre), further east beyond those parcels is the Palm Estates condominium development (zoned RM -8). The properties to the north are currently zoned PD, . Planned Development and contains the Woodfield residential subdivision. Also directly north of the subject site is the Bella Rosa residential subdivision zoned RM -8, Multiple Family Residential District (up to 8 units per acre). Directly to the west is land zoned RM -8, Multiple Family Residential District (up to 8 units .per acre) which is currently developed with the Bella Vista Isles residential subdivision. 117 T•._____ 1% A ___'_I T--_—_—_ L_ C,'t_ _--J A ,'---- � TT___ l... J r' ' 1 S .,J I fir L. ►i �rLt } '� }apt �{� �J {I�dra�i� �,:a''�� ►��u.�''-. �3• .1f �1iJrSys f _ I 1j. Vero) Awl' �a Woodfield i',; w �Be8Cf1�. Woodfieldt C, A u y. u 26 Street: ._ . •,:. Y 1�.► Y� 26v' Street Bella Rosa _ M1� •r°, Pr i :.,,; Bella Vista :�" i -. ,a Palm Isles N urates ' UUMMSf Q� Indian River Mall46- "' s i Lowes - it Tar et et Sm a } '; ` Pu611x :, � = s � ; i SR60/20t Street -�,.� -LLLL 771f�" ' Subject Site 4� �. - 40.25 Acre r 118 � � RS -3 RS -fir' Future Land Use Pattern As shown in Figure 5, the subject site is designated M-1, Medium -Density Residential -1, on Indian River County's Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Map. The M-1 designation permits single- family and multi -family residential uses with densities of up to 8 units per acre. The properties directly to the east, west and south of the subject site also have an M-1 future land use designation. Also directly to the south of the subject site is the only site in Indian River County with an RC, Regional Commercial future land use designation; that site contains the Indian River Mall. The properties to the north of the subject site, across 26th Street, have an L-2 future land use designation. The L-2 future land use designation permits single-family and multi -family residential uses up to 6 units per acre. Environment The subject site is currently vacant and vegetated. Prior to development, the site will be reviewed by County Environmental Planning staff for tree preservation requirements under Chapter 927 of the Indian River County Land Development Regulations. Based on County records, no wetlands or any other environmentally sensitive habitat have been identified within the subject site. According to Flood Insurance Rating Maps, .the subject site is within Flood Zone X (area of minimal flood hazard). As with all development, a more detailed environmental review will be conducted during the development approval process. Utilities and Services The subject site is within the Urban Service Area of the County. Water Service is available from the North and South County Reverse Osmosis Plants (interlinked), which currently have sufficient capacity to accommodate the additional demand generated by the subject rezoning request. Wastewater service is available from the Central Regional Wastewater treatment plant. The West Regional Wastewater Treatment Plant has sufficient capacity to accommodate the additional demand generated by the subject rezoning request. Per Indian River County Land Development Regulations, the applicant may be required to pay hook-up and other customary fees and comply with other routine administrative procedures. If approved, rezoning does not guarantee any vested rights to receive Water and Wastewater treatment service. Transportation System The subject site abuts 26th Street. This roadway is classified as an Urban Minor Arterial road on the Indian River County Roadway Functional Classification Map. Located within an approximate 150-160 foot wide public right-of-way (width varies), this segment of 26th Street is a two lane paved road. Also within this County right-of-way is the Sub Lateral A -3-E Canal. This section of 26th Street is listed in the 5 -year Capital Improvements Program (CIP) of the County's Comprehensive Plan. Those improvements include widening 26th Street from two lanes to four lanes beginning at 43rd Avenue and ending at 66th Avenue. In addition to widening, the intersections of 26th street and 58th and 66th Avenues will be improved to accommodate the widening of 26th Street to four lanes. However, while these improvements are listed in the County's 120 5 -year CIP; they are not fully funded and only right-of-way acquisition is planned to occur within the next 5 years. Historic Approvals on the Subiect Site On March 4th 2003 the BCC approved a rezoning request initiated by Simon Property Group, LP to change the subject site from 4.5 acres of A-1, Agricultural -I District; 16.6 acres of RM -6, Multiple -Family Residential (up to 6 units/acre); and 19.2 acres of RS -6, Single -Family Residential (up to 6 units/acre) to RM -8, Multiple -Family Residential (up to 8 units/acre) (see Attachment 4). Subsequently on January 20th 2009, the BCC reviewed and approved a request from Sunnyside Up 1, LLC to rezone the subject site from RM -8, Multiple -Family Residential (up to 8 units/acre) to PDTND, Planned Development Traditional Neighborhood Design. That approval allowed for up to 354 residential units (a mix of single and multiple family) and approximately 32,000 square feet of commercial/retail space with a reverter clause stating that if no project construction had commenced within 10 years from approval of the ordinance, the PD zoning would terminate and revert back to the prior RM -8 zoning. In 2009, the BCC modified this planned development's reverter deadline to increase it by 2 years (see Attachment 5). Subsequently on December 13th 2011, the BCC extended the reverter deadline 7 additional years to January 20th 2029 (see Attachment 6). The current rezoning request, if approved, would revert the subject site back to the RM -8 zoning district that was previously approved by the BCC in 2003. Zoning District Differences In terms of potential uses, there are a few substantial differences between the existing PDTND district and the proposed RM -8 district. The most notable difference between the existing PDTND district and proposed RM -8 district, is that the proposed RM -8 zoning district allows for a maximum of approximately 322 residential units while the existing PDTND district allows for a total of 354 residential units and 32,000 sq. ft. of commercial floor area. The purpose statement for these zoning districts, found in the County's Land Development Regulations (LDRs), are as follows: Planned Development Traditional Neighborhood Design: The Planned Development Traditional Neighborhood Design zoning district is established for the following purposes; • To implement the policies of the comprehensive plan. • To provide for planned residential communities, containing a variety of .building arrangements, planned commercial and tourist commercial centers, planned industrial parks, planned public and quasi -public facilities, or planned multiple use centers which include a diversity of residential, commercial, industrial and public uses that are complementary and compatible with adjacent areas and developed in accordance with an approved development plan. • To allow diversification of uses, structures, and open spaces in a manner compatible with existing and pennitted land uses on abutting properties. • To reduce energy costs through a more efficient use of land design and smaller networks of utilities and streets. than is possible through application of other: zoning districts and subdivision requirements. • To ensure that development will occur according to the limitations of use, design, density, 121 coverage and phasing stipulated on an approved development plan. • To preserve the natural amenities and environmental assets of the land by encouraging the preservation and improvement of scenic and functional open areas • To encourage an increase in the amount and use of open space areas by permitting a more economical and concentrated use of building areas than would be possible through conventional zoning districts. • To provide maximum opportunity for application of innovative concepts of site planning in the creation of aesthetically pleasing living, shopping and working environments on properties of adequate size, shape and location. • To provide an incentive for the development of housing units affordable to households with low and moderate incomes. In Short, the PDTND district is a flexible zoning district which is intended to provide an appropriate balance between the intensity of development and the adequacy of support services and facilities. Multiple -Family Residential Districts: The multiple -family districts are established to implement the policies of the Indian River County Comprehensive Plan for managing land designated for residential uses, providing opportunities for multifamily residential units and, ensuring adequate public facilities to meet the needs of residents. These districts are also intended to implement the County's housing policies by providing opportunities for a varied and diverse housing supply. To compare and contrast these two districts, the RM -8, Multiple -Family Residential district (up to 8 units per acre) and the PDTND, Planned Development Traditional Neighborhood Design district both allow multi -family residential uses. However, the PDTND district allows for 9.5% of the project area to be used for commercial/retail space, while the RM -8 district does not allow for any commercial/retail space. A detailed list of uses allowed in the RM -8 zoning district is included as Attachment 7 to this report. ANALYSIS In this section, an analysis of the reasonableness of the rezoning request will be presented. Specifically, this section will include an analysis of the request's: • Impact on public facilities; • Consistency with the County's Comprehensive Plan; • Consistency with the County's Land Development Regulations (LDRs) • Compatibility with the surrounding area; and • Potential impact on environmental quality. Impact on Public Facilities The subject site is located within the Urban Service Area, an area deemed suited for urban scale development. Within the Urban Service Area, the comprehensive plan establishes standards for: Transportation, Potable Water, Wastewater, Solid Waste, Stormwater Management, and Recreation (Future Land Use Element Policy 3.1). Adequate provision of those services is necessary to ensure the continued quality of life enjoyed by the community. To ensure that the minimum acceptable standards for those services and facilities are maintained, the comprehensive plan requires that new development be reviewed for a concurrency determination. For rezoning 122 requests, that review is undertaken as part of the conditional concurrency determination application process. As per section 910.07 of the County's LDRs, conditional concurrency review examines the available capacity of each facility with respect!to a proposed project. Since rezoning requests are not projects, County regulations call for the concurrency review to be based upon the most intense use of the subject property allowed within the requested rezoning district. For RM -8 rezoning requests, the most intense use of a property (according to the County's LDR's) is the maximum number of units that could be built on the site, based on the size of the property and maximum density under the proposed rezoning. As per section 910.07(2) of the Concurrency Management Chapter of the County's Land Development Regulations, projects which do not increase land use density or intensity are exempt from concurrency requirements. As shown on the next page, since the County's concurrency management system assigns a lower land use intensity to uses within the RM -8 district than it does to uses in the approved PDTND district there will be no increase in density or intensity of the uses due to this rezoning request. Therefore, this request is exempt from the county's concurrency determination requirement. 1. Size of Area to be Rezoned: 2. Existing Zoning District: 3. Proposed Zoning District: 4. Most Intense Use of Subject Property Under Existing Zoning District: 5. Most Intense Use of Subject Property Under Proposed Zoning District: Consistency with Comprehensive Plan ± 40.25 acres PDTND, Planned Development Traditional Neighborhood Design District RM -8, Multiple -Family Residential District (up to 8 units/acre) 308 Multiple -Family Units, 46 Single -Family Units arid, 32,000 sq. ft. of retail/commercial 322 Multiple -Family Units Rezoning requests are reviewed for consistency with all applicable policies of the comprehensive plan. Rezoning requests must also be consistent with the overall designation of land uses as depicted on the Future Land Use Map. In this case, the subject property is designated M-1, Medium -Density Residential -1, on the Future Land Use Map. Since RM -8 zoning is allowed in the M-1 district, the proposed zoning is consistent with the Future Land Use Map. Other than the Future Land Use Map, the goals, objectives, and policies are the most important parts of the comprehensive plan. Policies are statements in the plan that identify the actions which the county will take in order to direct the community's development. As courses of action committed to by the county, policies provide the basis for all county land development decisions. While all comprehensive plan policies are important, some have more applicability than others in 123 reviewing rezoning requests. Of particular{ applicability for this request are the following objectives and policies: Future Land Use Element Obiective 1 Future Land Use Element Objective 1 states' that the county will have a compact and energy efficient land use pattern; an overall low density character. By allowing the subject site to be developed in a manner that is consistent with the site's land use designation, the request allows a more compact and energy efficient land use pattern within the Urban Service Area. This request will also reduce the maximum number of units that could be built on the subject site. For these reasons, the request is consistent with Future Ll and Use Element Objective 1. i Future Land Use Element Policies 1.13 and 1.14 Future Land Use Element Policy 1.13 states that medium density residential uses shall be located within the Urban Service Area. In addition, Future Land Use Element Policy 1.14 states that the M-1, Medium -Density Residential -1, land use designation is intended for residential uses with densities up to 8 units/acre. Since the subject property is located within the county's Urban Service Area, is located within an area designated as M-1 on the county's Future Land Use Map, and the proposed zoning district would permit residential uses no greater. than the 8 units/acre permitted by the M-1 designation, the proposed request is consistent with Policies 1.13 and 1.14. Future Land Use Element Policy 1.43 Future Land Use Element Policy 1.43 provides criteria that the Board of County Commissioners may use to determine whether or not a proposed zoning district is appropriate for a particular site. Below is a table listing the specific rezoning criteria from Policy 1.43 for multiple zoning districts and staff determinations of how the criteria are met. Table 1 Proposed Residential Multiple Family RM -8 Zoning District Review Criteria Meets Comments Criteria? 1. Adjacent to other multiple -family Yes The subject site is adjacent to multiple family districts areas ; to the west, south and, northeast. 2. Adjacent to employment centers Yes The subject site is adjacent to the Indian River Mall I and near commercial uses along State Road 60. 3. Along Arterial and collector roads, Yes' The subject site is along an Urban Minor Arterial road particularly to buffer single family areas ' and would act as a buffer to single family areas to the north from more intense development along State Road 60. 4. Adjacent to commercial uses, Yes The subject site is adjacent to the Indian River Mall particularly to buffer single family areas. and would buffer single family areas to the north from more intense development along State Road 60. 124 5. Not abutting single family areas on all Yes The subject site is not abutting single family areas on sides all sides. The subject site abuts single family on its east side. Future Land Use Element Obiective 2 In unincorporated Indian River County, all residential development greater than 0.2 units/acre, and all non -agriculture related commercial/industrial uses will be located within the Urban Service Area, which contains the infrastructure and services needed to accommodate such development. Any development on the subject site would be within the Urban Services Area of the County. Future Land Use Element Policy 2.2 Future Land Use Element Policy 2.2 states that the county shall encourage and direct growth into the Urban Service Area through zoning and LDRs. Since the proposed rezoning would allow and encourage more development on the subject property and the subject property is within the Urban Service Area, the request implements Future Land Use Element Policy 2.2. Transportation Element Policy 8.1 Transportation Element Policy 8.1 states that the County will implement Future Land Use Element policies which restrict urban sprawl, limit strip commercial development, promote infill, encourage TND projects, promote public transportation, and encourage higher intensity uses in major corridors. Since the subject site is proposed to be rezoned to a higher intensity residential use and is within close proximity to SR 60 and Indian River State College, the request supports Transportation Element Policy 8.1 Housing Element Policy 1.9 Housing Element Policy 1.9 is under an overall objective to increase housing affordability. This policy states that the County shall support housing developments near transportation hubs, major employment centers, and mixed use development by expediting the permit process for these types of housing projects. Allowing increased density of multi -family zoning will provide more opportunity for developers to increase the supply of owner occupied and renter. occupied housing which can, over time, decrease the cost of housing (supply vs. demand). Since the subject site proposed to be rezoned is within close proximity to SR 60, the Indian River Mall, and Commercial/Industrial Nodes, the request supports Housing Element Policy 8.1. Housing Element Objective 2 Housing Element Objective 2 states that within its residential areas, Indian River County will have adequate sites to accommodate current and anticipated housing demand for all income groups and groups with special housing needs. This objective also states that these sites shall have an appropriate land use and zoning designation which allows for a balanced housing market with a mixture of housing types, including mobile and manufactured homes. Consistent with this objective, the proposed rezoning would allow and encourage more multi -family residential development, which is proposed in response to current and anticipated housing demand. 125 While the referenced policies are particularly applicable to this request, other Comprehensive Plan policies and objectives also have relevance. For that reason, staff evaluated the subject request for consistency with all applicable plan policies and objectives. Based upon that analysis, staff determined that the request is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. Consistency with the County Land Development Regulations (LDRs) Rezoning requests must be consistent with all applicable sections of the County LDRs, including Section 902.12(3) standards of review. A copy of those standards are included as Attachment 8 to this report. With this rezoning request, staff determined that the request is consistent with the LDR review standards listed in Section 902.12(3). Compatibility with the Surrounding Area There are a variety of uses adjacent to the subject site, with the subject site serving as a transitional area from the commercial uses to the south to the lower density residential uses, the church, and the electrical substation, to the north and east. Therefore, it is staff's position that the requested zoning district is appropriate for the site and that development under this zoning district will be compatible with surrounding land uses. Generally, multi -family residential development is compatible with commercial uses. There are two reasons for this, 1) multi -family development can buffer single-family uses from more intense commercial uses. 2) multi -family development provides more housing choices for residents who want to live near employment opportunities. Because the subject site is situated between an,L-2, Low -Density Residential -2 neighborhood to the north and, the County's only RC, Regional Commercial designated land to the south, the most appropriate use of the subject property is multi -family residential. Multi -family residential on the subject site will serve the community as a transitional area between the regional commercial use (the Indian River Mall) and nearby single-family residences. A small segment of the subject site's southeast perimeter directly abuts single-family homes (Rivera Estates). The County's LDRs requires that buffers be constructed when multi -family development abuts single-family development. Due to the large size of the subject site and presence of Native Upland habitat, 10-15% of the site will be required to be set aside as Native Upland habitat. While a fee may be paid in lieu of the set aside, land used as set aside can provide additional buffering to adjacent single-family homes. All in all, this request is not anticipated to have adverse impacts on surrounding areas. For this reason, staff can confirm that the requested RM -8 zoning is compatible with development in the surrounding area. Potential Impact on Environmental Quality The subject site proposed to be rezoned from PDTND to RM -8 currently contains vacant, partially vegetated lands. Since this site contains no land designated as environmentally sensitive or protected, such as wetlands or sensitive uplands, development of the site is anticipated to have minor adverse impacts on environmental quality. Additionally, the most intense use of the site 126 under the.proposed RM -8 zoning is less intense compared to the current PDTND zoning. When new development is proposed for the subject site, a more detailed environmental analysis will be conducted during the development approval process. CONCLUSION Based on the analysis, staff has determined that the requested zoning district is compatible with surrounding areas, is consistent with the comprehensive plan, meets all concurrency criteria, will have no negative impacts on environmental quality, and meets all applicable rezoning criteria. Most importantly, the subject site is located in an area deemed suitable for medium density multi- family uses. For these reasons, staff can support this request. RECOMMENDATION Based on the analysis, staff and the Planning and Zoning Commission recommend that the Board of County Commissioners approve this request to rezone the subject site from PDTND to RM -8 by adopting the proposed rezoning ordinance. This action, if approved by the BCC, will supersede and invalidate ordinance No. 2011-010 (Attachment 6). ATTACHMENTS. 1. Summary Page 2. Rezoning Application 3. Unapproved March 1 Ph 2021 Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes 4. Ordinance 2003-001 (Approving RM -8) 5. Ordinance No. 2009-020 (PDTND Reverter) 6. Ordinance No. 2011 -0 10 (PDTND Reverter) 7. Section 911.08(4) Table of Uses allowed in Multiple -Family districts 8. Section 902.12(3), Standards of Review 9. Rezoning Ordinance FACommunity Development\Rezonings\Sunnyside Up I, LLC - 2008050077-88741\BCC\BCC staff report (40.25 acres -Sunnyside Up 1 LLC).docx 127 GENERAL Applicant: Location: Acreage: Land Use Desi ation: Existing: Requested Zoning: Existing Land Use SUMMARY PAGE Sunnyside Up 1, LLC 6205 26th Street, Vero Beach, Florida 32966 +/- 40.25 acres M-1, Medium Density Residential -1 (8 units/Acre) PDTND; Planned Development Traditional Neighborhood Design RM -8, RI sidential Multi -Family District (up to 8 units/acre) Vacant, Wooded lot ADJACENT LAND ' North: Woodfield, PD Planned development; South: The Indian River Mall, CG General Commercial District, Vacant, A-1 (up to 1 unit/5 acres) Stormwater Management, RM -6, Multiple Family Residential District (up to 8 units/acre); East: Bella Rosa, RM -8, Multiple Family Residential (up to 8 units/acre), Rivera Estates, RS -6, Single Family Residential (up to 6 units/acre); West: Bella Vista Isles, RM -8 Residential Multiple Family (up to 8 units/acre). A INFRASTRUCTURE I Potable water service is available within +/- t/4 mile and wastewater service is available within +/- t/2 mile i ENVIRONMENTAL CONSTRAINTS None_ Floyd 7nne X PUBLIC NOTIFICATION STAFF RECOMMENDATION Approval nnlu� �♦ H o l o n— .. ��u�rrin;�ra I lt• �awi nii = 10 F_02�2�� I�IIIII IIIIIII� 1, VIIIA IIIIIl111 i ATTACHMENT 1 128 Planning and Board of Zoning County Commission Commissioners Staff Contact: Matt Kalap Matt Kalap Date 2/24/2021 4/4/2021 Advertised: # of Surrounding Property 110 — Total 110 -- Total Owner Notifications: Date Notification 2/24/2020 4/5/2021 Mailed: Date Sign 2/24/2020 4/5/2021 Posted: STAFF RECOMMENDATION Approval nnlu� �♦ H o l o n— .. ��u�rrin;�ra I lt• �awi nii = 10 F_02�2�� I�IIIII IIIIIII� 1, VIIIA IIIIIl111 i ATTACHMENT 1 128 APPLICATION FORM REZONING REQUEST (RZON) INDIAN RIVER COUNTY Each application must be complete when submitted and must include all required attachments incomplete applications will not be processed and will be returned to the applicant. Assigned Project Number: RZON - 2008050077-88741 Current Owner Applicant (Contract Purchaser) Agent Name: Sunnyside Up I, LLC Remi Properties, InC Bruce BarketV Collins Brown Complete Mailing Address: 900 CasUe Hanro r Circle, Vero Beach. FL 32963 1802 S. Fiske Blvd., Rockledge, FL 32955 756 Beachland Blvd., Vero Beach, FL 32963 Phone(including area code) 772-234-3118 321-632-3444 772-231-4343 Fax#: (including area code) 321-632-1405 E -Mail: De@Navobuilders.com Pvavala@remipropertiesinc.com Bbarkett@veDlaw.com Contact Person: David Ederer Paul Vavala Bruce Barkett Signature of Owner or Agent: Property Information Site Address: 6205 26th Street, Vero Beach, FL and adjacent properties Site Tax Parcel I.D. #s: See attached Exhibit A Subdivision Name, Unit Number, Block and Lot Number (if applicable) Existing Zoning District: PDTN D Existing Land Use Designation: M-1 Requested Zoning District: RM -8 Total (gross) Acreage of Parcel:40.3 1 Acreage (net) to be Rezoned: 40.3 Existing Use on Site:Vacant Land Proposed Use on Site: Multifamily - Rental Apartments 'HIE APPLICANT MUST ATTEND A PRE -APPLICATION CONFERENCE WITH LONG-RANGE PLANNING SECTION STAFF PRIOR TO APPLYING IN ORDER TO RESOLVE OR AVOID PROBLEMS CONNECTED WITH THE REZONING REQUEST. 129 Attachment 2 REZONING APPLICATION CHECKLIST Please attach the foUowing items to this application. Do not ignore any of the items. Indicate "N/A" if an item is not applicable. ITEMS Applicant's Checklist Staff Checklist I. Fee: $3,000.00 2. Completed Rezoning Application Form (front page) 3. Letter of Authorization from Current Owner(s) OR Current Owner is Applicant 4. Verified statement (separate letter) naming every individual or entity having legal or equitable ownership in the property. 5. One (1) Copy of the current Owner's Deed 6. A Current Owner's Title Policy OR A Certificate of Title from a Title Company OR An attorney' s written opinion evidencing fee . ownership of the property. 7. One (1) SEALED boundary survey of the area to be rezoned. The boundary survey shall include, but not be limited to the following: D a legal description of the land to be rezoned D . the size of the land to be rezoned D the public road right-of-way width ofadjacent roads; and D a north arrow 8. Electronic version (MS Word is preferable) of the legal description 9. Copy of Approved Concurrency Certificate OR Copy of filed application for Concurrency Certificate, including traffic study, if applicable NOTE: ITEMS 2-6 MUST INDICATE THE SAME OWNERSHIP OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY. Revised: June 10, 2019 FACommunity Development\APPLICAT!ONS\Comp. Plan and Rezoning applications\rezoningrequestfonn - Updated 20 I9.docx 130 Attachment 2 PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION There was a meeting of the Indian River County (IRC) Planning and Zoning Commission (PZC) on Thursday, March 11, 2021 at 7:00 p.m. in the Commission Chambers of the County Administration Building, 1801 27th Street, Vero Beach, Florida. You may hear an audio of the meeting; review the meeting agenda, backup material and the minutes on the Indian River County website hftps://www.ircqov.com/Boards/PZC/2021.htm Present were members: Chairperson Dr. Jonathan Day, District 4 Appointee; Vice Chairperson Mr. Todd Brognano, Member at Large; Ms. Beth Mitchell, District 1 Appointee; Mr. Curtis Carpenter, District 3 Appointee; Mr. Jordan Stewart, Member at Large (via conference phone); and Ms. Teri Barenborg, non-voting School Board Representative. Also, present were IRC staff: Mr. Dylan Reingold, County Attorney; Mr. Phil Matson, Community Development Director; Mr. Bill Schutt, Long -Range Planning Chief; Mr. Matt Kalap, Planner, Long -Range Planning and Ms. Vanessa Desnoyers, Recording Secretary. Due to the coronavirus pandemic, there was sufficient room within the chambers to satisfy recommended social distancing measures. Call to Order and Pledge of Allegiance Chairperson Dr. Jonathan Day called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. and all stood for the Pledge of Allegiance. Additions and Deletions to the Agenda There were none. Approval of Minutes ON MOTION BY Mr. Curtis Carpenter, SECONDED BY Ms. Beth Mitchell, the members voted (5-0) to approve the minutes of the February 11, 2021. The motion passed. 131 Public Hearings Chairperson Dr. Jonathan Day read the following into the record: A. Sunnyside Up 1, LLC's: Request to Rezone Approximately +/- 40.25 acres located North of the Indian River Mall, between 66th and 58th Avenues, and South of 26th Street from PDTND, Planned Development Traditional Neighborhood Design to RM -8, Multiple Family Residential District (up to 8 units/acre) (RZON2008050077-88741) [Quasi -Judicial] Chairperson Dr. Jonathan Day asked the Commissioners to reveal any ex - parte communication or conflict that would not allow them to make an unbiased decision. The members stated that they had not had any ex -parte communication. The secretary administered the testimonial oath to those present who wished to speak at tonight's meeting on this matter. Mr. Matt Kalap reviewed information regarding the proposed site and gave a PowerPoint presentation, copies of which are on file in the Board of County Commissioners (BCC) Office. At the conclusion of the presentation, staff recommended that the PZC recommend that the BCC approve the request to rezone the subject site from PDTND to RM -8. Mr. Bill Schutt clarified components of the presentation dealing with buffering between potential existing uses and potential future uses if the rezoning were approved. Mr. Schutt also provided a brief history of the rezoning of the subject site indicating that prior to being rezoned to PDTND, the property was zoned RM - 8. Dr. Johnathan Day opened the floor for public comment James Ackerman, of 6176 Coverty PI, stated that he believes there has been a miscommunication between developers and the community. He questioned the developer's plans for stoplights, and traffic circulation. Dr. Day informed Mr. Ackerman that a future meeting when a development proposal is made, the County will have more detailed plans pertaining to the project relating to traffic circulation, turn lanes, stoplights and that the only issue for discussion presently is the rezoning issue. Mr. Reingold reiterated that after the vote, residents will have an opportunity to speak to Staff and voice any additional concerns before the BCC meeting. County staff requested that interested individuals leave their email addresses so that staff could provide project information when it is submitted to the County Technical Review Committee. 132 Mr. Gary Staggs, of 3182 Sussex Way, thanked county staff and submitted a petition for the record to the Commission and asked that they seriously consider the residents' concerns about the issues presented in the petition. Chairman Day asked for the petition to be shared during the Board of County Commissioners public hearing on this rezoning request. Mr. Steve Tebow, of 6237 Thames PL, stated that he is 300 feet from the project and where the development would be. He questioned what would _happen to the trees and plans for the buffer (along 26th Street). He stated that the dust from building, traffic noise and construction will affect them. Chairman Day asked if Mr. Steve Tebow was aware that commercial development could happen under the current PDTND zoning, Mr. Steve Tebow acknowledged he is aware of that fact. Mr. Tom Mancini, of 6400 Oxford Circle, questioned if a decision has already been made to approve this request. Mr. Reingold explained that this was a quasi- judicial proceeding, that has no pre -determined outcome. Mr. Mancini questioned buffer requirements, if the road would be widened and voiced additional concerns. Chairman Day explained that the project is still in its infancy and those questions are beyond the scope of this hearing. Vice Chairman Brognano stated that if this request receives approval from the Planning and Zoning Commission it would then have to receive final approval from the Board of County Commissioners. Then, if approved by the Board of County Commissioners the developer would need to submit plans for any proposed development. Mr. Tom Mancini asked if 26th street would be widened. Director Phil Matson explained that RM -8 type development is not permitted outside the Urban Service Area and that this request would reduce development intensity on the subject site from the Commercial and residential uses already approved under the PDTND and the capacity threshold for 26th street would not be broken by development on the subject site. Mr. Joe Hudak, of 3185 Astor Ave questioned if there would be a commercial business in the zoning district and, if 322 residential units are guaranteed to be developed on the subject site. Director Phil Matson re -iterated that 322 units is a maximum and more details will be available at a later time. Director Matson responded that when the County receives a site plan there will be more information to share with the residents. Dr. Johnathan Day closed the floor for public comment 133 ON MOTION BY Mr. Todd Brognano, SECONDED BY Ms. Beth Mitchell, the members voted (5-0) to recommend that the BCC approve the request to rezone the subject site from PDTND to RM -8. Commissioner's Matters Ms. Mitchell stated that she is unavailable for the April 8, 2021 meeting. Planning Matters There were none. Attorney's Matters There were none. Adjournment There being no further business,,the meeting adjourned at 7:39 p.m. 134 Note: This is a copy from the original file used to prepare the proposed ordinance. An Executed copy of this Ordinance is on file in the County Community Development Department ORDINANCE NO. 2003 - AN ORDINANCE OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE AND THE ACCOMPANYING ZONING MAP FOR 40.3 ACRES LOCATED BETWEEN 26TH STREET AND INDIAN RIVER MALL, FROM A-1, AGRICULTURAL DISTRICT (UP TO 1 UNIT/5 ACRES), RM -6, MULTIPLE -FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (UP TO 6 UNITS/ACRE) AND RS -6, SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (UP TO 6 UNITS/ACRE), TO RM -8, MULTIPLE -FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (UP TO 8 UNITS/ACRE); AND PROVIDING CODIFICATION, SEVERABILITY, AND EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission, sitting as the local planning agency on such matters, has held a public hearing and subsequently made a recommendation regarding this rezoning request; and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida, did publish and send its Notice of Intent to rezone the hereinafter described property; and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners has determined that this rezoning is in conformance with the Comprehensive Plan of Indian River County; and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners has held a public hearing pursuant to this rezoning request, at which parties in interest and citizens were heard; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED, by the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida, that the zoning of the following described properties situated in Indian River County, Florida, to -wit: THAT CERTAIN PARCEL OF LAND LYING AND BEING IN PART OF TRACT 4 OF SECTION 5, TOWNSHIP 33 SOUTH, RANGE 39 EAST, ACCORDING TO THE LAST GENERAL PLAT OF LANDS OF THE INDIAN,RIVER FARMS COMPANY SUBDIVISION AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 2, PAGE 25, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA, NOW LYING AND BEING IN INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, Page 1 of 4 Attach%nt 4 Note: This is a copy from the original file used to prepare the proposed ordinance. An Executed copy of this Ordinance is on file in the County Community Development Department ORDINANCE NO. 2003 - SAID PARCEL OF LAND LYING SOUTH AND CONTIGUOUS TO THE SOUTH RIGHT- OF - WAY -LINE OF "SUB -LATERAL A-3 CANAL" INDIAN RIVER FARMS WATER CONTROL DISTRICT, 30.00 FEET WIDE RIGHT-OF-WAY; EAST OF AND CONTIGUOUS TO THE EAST LINE OF THE 72.00 FEET WIDE NORTH "MALL ENTRANCE ROAD" BEING PART OF LOT 10 OF THE "INDIAN RIVER MALL— THE MALL SUBDIVISION", PLAT BOOK 14, PAGE 59- 59A, INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA; NORTH OF AND CONTIGUOUS TO THE NORTHERLY BOUNDARY LINE OF SAID LOT 9 AND 10 OF "INDIAN RIVER MALL - THE MALL SUBDIVISION"; AND WEST OF AND CONTIGUOUS TO THE EAST LINE OF AFOREMENTIONED TRACT 4, SECTION 5, TOWNSHIP 33 SOUTH, RANGE 39 EAST(PARCEL I.D. # 05-33-39-00000-3000-00001.0). CONTAINING 4.5 ACRES MORE OR LESS is changed from A-1, Agricultural District (up to 1 unit/5 acres) to RM -8 , Multiple -Family Residential (up to 8 units/acre) THAT CERTAIN PARCEL OF LAND LYING AND BEING IN PART OF TRACT 1 AND TRACT 2 OF SECTION 5, TOWNSHIP 33 SOUTH, RANGE 39 EAST, ACCORDING TO THE LAST GENERAL PLAT OF LANDS OF' THE INDIAN RIVER FARMS COMPANY SUBDIVISION AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 2, PAGE 25, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA, NOW LYING AND BEING IN INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, SAID PARCEL OF LAND LYING SOUTH OF AND CONTIGUOUS TO THE SOUTHERLY BOUNDARY LINES OF THOSE CERTAIN PARCELS DESIGNATED ON THE INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA TAX MAPS AS PARCEL IIA AND PARCEL 1, PARCEL I.D. NO. 05-33-39-00000-1000-00003.2 AND PARCEL I.D. NO. 05-33-39-00000-1000-00003. 1; NORTH OF LOT 9 OF "THE INDIAN RIVER MALL — THE MALL SUBDIVISION" AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 14, PAGES 59-59A, INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA; WESTERLY OF THOSE CERTAIN PARCELS DESIGNATED ON THE INDIAN RIVER COUNTY,FLORIDA TAX MAPS AS PARCEL I.D. NO. 05-33-39-00000-1000-00002.2 AND PARCEL I.D. NO. 05-33-39-00000-1000-00004.0. CONTAINING 19.2 ACRES MORE OR LESS! is changed from RS -6, Single -Family Residential (up to 6 units/acre) to RM -8, Multiple -Family Residential (up to 8 units/acre) AND Page 2 of 4 Attachment 4 Note: This is a copy from the original file used to prepare the proposed ordinance. An Executed copy of this Ordinance is on file in the County Community Development Department ORDINANCE NO. 2003 - THOSE CERTAIN PARCELS OF LAND LYING AND BEING IN PART OF TRACT 2 AND TRACT 3 OF SECTION 5, TOWNSHIP 33 SOUTH,.RANGE 39 EAST ACCORDING TO THE LAST GENERAL PLAT OF LANDS OF THE INDIAN RIVER COMPANY SUBDIVISION AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 2, PAGE 25, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA, NOW LYING AND BEING IN INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, PARCEL I.D. NO. 05-33-39-0.0000-1000-00003.3 LYING SOUTH AND CONTIGUOUS TO THE SOUTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF "SUB -LATERAL A-3 CANAL" INDIAN RIVER FARMS WATER CONTROL DISTRICT 30.00 FEET WIDE RIGHT-OF-WAY; EAST OF AND CONTIGUOUS TO THE WEST LINE OF AFOREMENTIONED TRACT 3 OF SECTION 5, TOWNSHIP 33 SOUTH, RANGE 39 EAST; NORTH OF AND CONTIGUOUS TO THE NORTHERLY LINE OF LOT 9 OF "INDIAN RIVER MALL — THE MALL SUBDIVISION" AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 14, PAG 59-59A, INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA; WESTERLY OF AND CONTIGUOUS TO THAT CERTAIN PARCEL OF LAND AS DESIGNATED ON THE INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA TAX MAPS AS PARCEL I.D. NO. 05-33-39-00000-1000-00003.2; AND PARCEL I.D. NO. 05-33-39-00000-1000-00004.0 LYING SOUTH AND EAST OF THAT CERTAIN PARCEL DESIGNATED ON THE INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA TAX MAPS AS PARCEL I.D. NO. 05-33-39-00000-1000-00003.0; NORTH OF AND CONTIGUOUS TO THE NORTHERLY LINE OF AFOREMENTIONED LOT 9, WEST OF THE WEST BOUNDARY LINE OF "PLAT OF RIVERA ESTATES" PLAT BOOK 1, PAGE 12, INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA. CONTAINING 16.6 ACRES MORE OR LESS. is changed from to RM -6, Multiple -family Residential District (up to 6 units/acre) to RM -8, Multiple -Family Residential (up to 8 units/acre) All with the meaning and intent and as set forth and described in said Land Development Regulations. This ordinance shall become effective upon filing with the Department of State. Approved and adopted by the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida, on this 4th day of March, 2003. This ordinance was advertised in the Press -Journal on the 19th day of February, 2003, for a public hearing to be held on the 4th day of March, 2003, at which time it was moved for adoption by Page 3 of 4 Attach Bgnt 4 Note: This is a copy from the original file used to prepare the proposed ordinance. An Executed copy of this Ordinance is on file in the County Community Development Department ORDINANCE NO. 2003 - Commissioner , seconded by Commissioner , and adopted by the following vote: Is Chairman Kenneth R. Macht Vice -Chairman Caroline D. Ginn Commissioner Fran B. Adams Commissioner Arthur R. Neuberger Commissioner Thomas S. Lowther BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY BY: Kenneth R. Macht, Chairman ATTEST BY: Jeffrey K. Barton, Clerk This ordinance was filed with the Department of State on the following date: APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGAL SUFFICIENCY William G. Collins II, Deputy County Attorney APPROVED AS TO PLANNING MATTERS Page 4 of 4 Attachlfint 4 Note: This is a cony from the original file used to prepare the proposed ordinance. An Executed copy of this Ordinance is on file in the County Community Development Department i ORDINANCE NO. 2003- . i i Robert M. Keating, AICP; Community Development Director Indian River Co. Approved Date Admin. Legal Bud et Dept. Risk Mgr. F:\Community Development\Users\LONG RANGE\Rzon\Simon Property\ORD.doc Page 5 of 4 i Attach%nt 4 Note: This is a copy from the original file used to prepare the proposed ordinance. An Executed copy of this Ordinance is on file in the County Community Development Department I ORDINANCE NO. 2009-.020 AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA EXTENDING THE DEADLINE BY THREE YEARS FOR PLANNED DEVELOPMENTS TO COMMENCE CONSTRUCTION OR HAVE THEIR ZONING REVERT TO THE SITE'S ORIGINAL (PRE -PLANNED DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL) ZONING; AND PROVIDING FOR EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County has approved four (4) Planned Development projects and included within those approvals is a requirement that the � Planned Development zoning approval sunset if project construction did not commence by a certain date; and WHEREAS, due to current economic conditions the Board finds that it is reasonable to extend those deadlines for an additional three years; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA that the zoning reverter deadlines for construction commencement of the following planned developments be extended for three years: Liberty Park PD to October 14, 2018 [revises Ordinance No. 2008-017] Mandala Club PD to May 17, 2011 [revises Ordinance No. 2005-016] Turtle Creek Preserve PD to April 4, 2014 [revises Ordinance No. 2006-009] Sunnyside Up PD to January 20, 2022 [revises Ordinance No. 2009-001] EFFECTIVE DATE. This ordinance shall take effect upon filing with the Florida Department of State. This ordinance was advertised in the Vero Beach Press -Journal on the 26th day of October, 2009, for a public hearing to be held on the loth day of November, 2009, at which time it was moved for adoption by Commissioner Flescher, seconded by Commissioner O'Bryan, and adopted by the following vote: Wesley S. Davis, Chairman Ave 140 Attachment 5 ORDINANCE NO. 2009 - Joseph E. Flescher, Vice Chairman Aye Commissioner Gary C. Wheeler Ave Commissioner Peter D. O'Bryan Ave Commissioner Bob Solari Aye The Chairman thereupon declared the ordinance duly passed and adopted this 10th day of November, 2009. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSION INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA In ATTEST: Jeffrey K. Barton, Clerk Deputy Clerk Wesley S. Davis, Chairman ACKNOWLEDGMENT by the Department of State of the State of Florida, this day of )2009. 2 FACommunity Development\Rezonings\Sunnyside Up I, LLC 2008050077-88741\PD Reverter\PD extensions.doc 141 Attachment 5 II I Note: This is a copy from the original file used to prepare the proposed ordinance. An Executed copy of this Ordinance is on file in the County Community Development Department ORDINANCE NO. 2011-.010 AN ORDINANCE OF.THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA FURTHER EXTENDING THE DEADLINE BY SEVEN (7) YEARS FOR PLANNED DEVELOPMENTS TO COMMENCE CONSTRUCTION OR HAVE THEIR ZONING REVERT TO THE SITE'S ORIGINAL (PRE -PLANNED DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL) ZONING; AND PROVIDING FOR EFFECTIVE DATE. I WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County had approved four (4) Planned Development projects and included within those approvals is a requirement that the Planned Development zoning approval sunset if project construction did not commence by a certain date; and 1 WHEREAS, one of the four projects is no longer viable due to foreclosure, therefore only three of the four approved projects are the subject of this ordinance; and , WHEREAS, due to current economic conditions the Board finds that it is reasonable to further extend those deadlines for an additional seven (7) years; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA that the zoning reverter deadlines for construction commencement of the following planned developments be further extended for seven (7) years: State Liberty Park PD to October 14,'2025 [revises Ordinance Nos. 2008-017 and 2009-020] Turtle Creek Preserve PD to April 4, 2021 [revises Ordinance Nos. 2006-009 and 2009-020] Sunnyside Up PD to January 20, 2029 [revises Ordinance Nos. 2009-001 and 2009-020] EFFECTIVE DATE. This ordinance shall take effect upon filing with the Florida Department of 142 Attachment 6 ORDINANCE NO. 2011-.010 This ordinance was advertised in the Vero Beach Press -Journal on the 28th day of November, 2011, for a public hearing to be held on the 13th day of December, 2011, at which time it was moved for adoption by Commissioner Solari, seconded by Commissioner Flescher, and adopted by the following vote: Chairman Gary C. Wheeler Aye Vice Chairman Peter D. O'Bryan Ave Commissioner Wesley S. Davis Absence Commissioner Joseph E. Flescher Aye Commissioner Bob Solari Aye The Chairman thereupon declared the ordinance duly passed and adopted this 13th day of December, 2011. ATTEST: Jeffrey K. Barton, Clerk M Deputy Clerk BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSION INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA ME Gary C. Wheeler, Chairman ACKNOWLEDGMENT by the Department of State of the State of Florida, this day of , 2011. 2 143 Attachment 6 (4) Uses. Uses in the multiple -family districts are classified as permitted uses, administrative permit uses, and special exception uses. Site plan review shall be required for the construction, alteration and use of all structures and buildings except single-family dwellings. EXPAND Attachment 7 https://library.municode.com/fl/indian_river county/codes/code_of ordinances?nodeld=COOR_TITIXLADERE_CH911zb—S911.08MUMIREDI 117 District Uses RM -3 RM -4 RM -6 RM -8 RM -10 Agricultural Noncommercial A A A A A nurseries and greenhouses Noncommercial A A A A A stables Residential Accessory single- A A A A A family dwelling unit I Small lot single- - - I A A A family subdivision Single-family P P P P P dwellings SF dwelling P P P P P (attached) Duplex P P P P P Multifamily P P P P P dwellings A Attachment 7 https://library.municode.com/fl/indian_river county/codes/code_of ordinances?nodeld=COOR_TITIXLADERE_CH911zb—S911.08MUMIREDI 117 Attachment 7 https://library.municode.com/fl/indian_river county/codes/code_Of ordinances?nodeld=COOR_TITIXLADERE_CH911Z0_S911.08MUMIREDI District Uses RM -3 RM -4 RM -6 RM -8 RM -10 Single-family A A A A A docks and private observation/fishing piers on vacant lots Bed and S S S A A breakfasts Residential resort - - S S S Guest cottage and A A A A A servant's quarters Small-scale A A A A A Traditional Neighborhood Design (TND). Institutional Child or adult care S S S A A facilities Foster care P P P P P facilities Group home (level I) A A A P P Attachment 7 https://library.municode.com/fl/indian_river county/codes/code_Of ordinances?nodeld=COOR_TITIXLADERE_CH911Z0_S911.08MUMIREDI https:Hlibrary.municode.com/fl/indian_river county/codes/code_of ordinances?nodeId=COOR_TITIXLADERE_CH911ZO—S911.08MUMIREDI District Uses RM -3 RM -4 RM -6 RM -8 RM -10 Adult congregate A A A P P living facility (8 residents maximum) Group home (level S S S A A II &III) Adult congregate S S S A A living facility (20 residents maximum) Group homes S S S S S (residential centers) ' Adult congregate S S S S S living facility (21+ residents) Residential - - - S S treatment centers Total care facilities - - - S S Places of worship A A A A A Cemeteries S S S S S Community Service 149 https:Hlibrary.municode.com/fl/indian_river county/codes/code_of ordinances?nodeId=COOR_TITIXLADERE_CH911ZO—S911.08MUMIREDI Attachment 7 https://library.municode.com/fl/indian_river_County/codes/code_of ordinances?nodeld=COOR_TITIXLADERE_CH911Z0_S911.08MUMIREDI District Uses RM -3 RM -4 RM -6 RM -8 RM -10 Cultural and civic facilities - - - S S Emergency services P P P P P Schools, primary and secondary S S S S S Colleges and universities S S S S S Libraries S S S S S Community centers S S S A A Government administrative buildings S S S S S Civic and social membership organizations - - - S S Recreation Beach clubs S S S S S Country clubs S S S S S Golf courses S S S S S Attachment 7 https://library.municode.com/fl/indian_river_County/codes/code_of ordinances?nodeld=COOR_TITIXLADERE_CH911Z0_S911.08MUMIREDI https:Hlibrary.municode.com/fl/indian_river county/codes/code_of ordinances?nodeld=COOR_TITIXLADERE_CH911ZO—S911.08MUMIREDI District Uses RM-3 RM-4 RM-6 RM-8 RM-10 Public parks and A A A A A playgrounds Tennis facilities S S S S S Yacht clubs S S S S S Health and fitness S S A A A clubs Public/private S S S S S docks utility Communications A l A l A 1 A l A l towers (wireless facilities including cell towers) Communications towers (non- wireless facilities including TV and radio broadcast towers) Amateur radio (accessory use) Less than 80 P P P P P feet -WInxihmAn https:Hlibrary.municode.com/fl/indian_river county/codes/code_of ordinances?nodeld=COOR_TITIXLADERE_CH911ZO—S911.08MUMIREDI Attachment https://library.municode.com/fl/indian_river_County/codes/code_of ordinances?nodeld=COOR_TITIXLADERE_CH911ZO—S911.08MUMIREDI District Uses RM -3 RM -4 RM -6 RM -8 RM -10 80 feet or S S S S S taller (see 971.44(4) for special criteria) Commercial Up to 70 feet: P P P P P Camouflaged Non- - - - - - camouflaged 70 feet to 150 feet: A A A A A Camouflaged i Monopole - - - - - (minimum of 2 users) Not - - - - - camouflaged and not monopole Over 150 feet: Attachment https://library.municode.com/fl/indian_river_County/codes/code_of ordinances?nodeld=COOR_TITIXLADERE_CH911ZO—S911.08MUMIREDI P - Permitted use A - Administrative permit use S - Special exception use 1 For wireless commercial facilities regulations, see subsection 971.44(5), Section 4 use table. AttachmenI 5D t I https://library.municode.com/fl/indian_river_County/codes/code_of ordinances?nodeld=COOR_TITIXLADERE_CH911Z0_S911.08MUMIREDI District Uses RM -3 RM -4 RM -6 RM -8 RM -10 All tower - - - - - types (see 971.44(1) for special criteria) Limited public and S S S S S private utilities Public and private S S S S S utilities heavy P - Permitted use A - Administrative permit use S - Special exception use 1 For wireless commercial facilities regulations, see subsection 971.44(5), Section 4 use table. AttachmenI 5D t I https://library.municode.com/fl/indian_river_County/codes/code_of ordinances?nodeld=COOR_TITIXLADERE_CH911Z0_S911.08MUMIREDI Section 902.12. - Amendments to the land development regulations text and official:zoning atlas. (3) Standards of review. In reviewing the application of a proposed amendment to the text of the land development regulations or an application for a proposed amendment to the official zoning atlas, the board of county commissioners and the planning and zoning commission shall consider: (a) Whether or not the proposed amendment is in conflict with any applicable portion of the land development regulations; (b) Whether or not the proposed amendment is consistent with all elements of the Indian River County Comprehensive Plan; (c) Whether or not the proposed amendment is consistent with existing and proposed land uses; (d) Whether or not the proposed amendment is in compliance with the adopted county thoroughfare plan; ! (e) Whether or not the proposed amendment would generate traffic which would decrease the service levels on roadways below level adopted in the comprehensive plan; (f) Whether or not there have been changed conditions which would warrant an amendment; (g) Whether or not the proposed amendment would decrease the level of service established in the comprehensive plan for sanitary sewer, potable water, solid waste, drainage, and recreation; (h) Whether or not the proposed amendment would result in significant adverse impacts on the natural environment; i (i) Whether or not the proposed amendment would result in an orderly and logical development pattern, specifically identifying any negative effects on such pattern; (j) Whether or not the proposed amendment would be in conflict with the public interest, and is in harmony with the purpose and interest of the land development regulations; as well as (k) Any other matters that may be deemed appropriate by the planning and zoning commission or the board of county commissioners in review and consideration of the proposed amendment such as police protection, fire protection, and emergency medical services. NOTE: Some of these items of consideration may be deemed as inapplicable in the review and approval of Land Development Regulation amendment requests. 151 AN ORDINANCE OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE AND THE ACCOMPANYING ZONING MAP FOR APPROXIMATELY ±40.25 ACRES LOCATED SOUTH OF AND ADJACENT TO 26th STREET APPROXIMATELY ±775 FEET EAST OF 66th AVENUE AND APPROXIMATELY ±700 FEET WEST OF 58th AVENUE AND NORTH OF THE INDIAN RIVER MALL, FROM PDTND, PLANNED DEVELOPMENT TRADITIONAL NEIGHBORHOOD DESIGN, TO RM -8, MULTIPLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (UP TO 8 UNITS PER ACRE); AND PROVIDING CODIFICATION, SEVERABILITY, AND EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission, sitting as the local planning agency on such matters, held a public hearing and subsequently made a recommendation regarding this rezoning request; and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida, did publish and send its Notice of Intent to rezone .the hereinafter described property; and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners held a public hearing pursuant to this rezoning request, at which parties in interest and citizens were heard; and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners determined that this rezoning is in conformance with the Comprehensive Plan of Indian River County. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida, that the zoning of the following described property situated in Indian River County, Florida, to -wit: SITUATED IN THE NORTH 1/2 OF SECTION 5, TOWNSHIP 33 SOUTH, RANGE 39 EAST, INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA: COMMENCING AT A POINT BEING 50.0 FEET EAST AND 30.0 FEET SOUTH OF THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE NORTHWEST ONE QUARTER OF SECTION 5, TOWNSHIP 33 SOUTH, RANGE 39 EAST; RUN PARALLEL TO THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 5, SOUTH 89°46'03" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 687.22 FEET TO THE PRINCIPAL POINT AND PLACE OF BEGINNING OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIPTION: 152 RUNNING PARALLEL TO THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 5, SOUTH 89°46'03" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 1921.89 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE CONTINUING RUNNING PARALLEL TO THE SAID NORTH LINE OF SECTION 5, SOUTH 89°45'58" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 333.91 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE PLAT OF BELLA ROSA, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 23, PAGE 25, INDIAN RIVER COUNTY RECORDS; THENCE SOUTH 00°14'14" WEST, ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID PLAT, A DISTANCE OF 504.22 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER THEREOF; THENCE NORTH 55034'30" EAST, ALONG THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID PLAT OF BELLA ROSA, A DISTANCE OF 116.02 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE DEPARTING THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID PLAT, PROCEED NORTH 87-09'12" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 7.99 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE NORTH 55044'03" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 222.15 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE NORTH 21033'17" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 8.58 FEET TO A POINT ON THE AFOREMENTIONED SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID PLAT OF BELLA ROSA, AND FOR THE FOLLOWING SIX (6) COURSES: NORTH 55034'30" EAST, A DISTANCE OF; 100.40 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE NORTH 89°40'41" EAST, A DISTANCE OF -258.58 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE I SOUTH 000 15'52" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 100.15 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE NORTH 89°41'01" EAST, A DISTANCE OF1143.04 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE NORTH 00°15'06" EAST, A DISTANCE OFA 100.17 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE NORTH 89°40'41" EAST, A DISTANCE OFA 173.33 FEET TO A POINT, THENCE DEPARTING SAID SOUTHERLY LINE, PROCEED SOUTH 84009'32" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 73.53 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE NORTH 48°00'05" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 11.87 FEET TO A POINT ON THE AFOREMENTIONED SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID PLAT OF BELLA ROSA,- THENCE ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY LINE, PROCEED NORTH 89°40'41" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 27.78 FEET TO A POINT, THENCE DEPARTING SAID SOUTHERLY LINE, PROCEED SOUTH 55°15'05" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 10.10 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE NORTH 84019'18" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 62.17 FEET TO A POINT ON THE AFOREMENTIONED SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID PLAT OF BELLA ROSA; THENCE ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY LINE, PROCEED NORTH 89040'41" EAST, A' DISTANCE OF 324.13 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE DEPARTING SAID SOUTHERLY LINE, PROCEED SOUTH 83016'45" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 66.01 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE NORTH 47052'06" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 12.14 FEET TO A POINT ON THE AFOREMENTIONED SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID PLAT OF BELLA ROSA; THENCE NORTH 89°40'41" EAST, ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY LINE, A DISTANCE OF 72.83 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID PLAT OF BELLA ROSA, THENCE DEPARTING SAID PLAT, PROCEED ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE OF THAT CERTAIN PARCEL CONVEYED TO INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, AS DESCRIBED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 1147, PAGE 499, PUBLIC 153 RECORDS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY; THENCE FOR THE FOLLOWING TWO (2) COURSES: SOUTH 00017'48" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 277.03 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE SOUTH 33036'26" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 143.82 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTHERLY LINE OF THE PLAT OF RIVIERA ESTATES, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 1, PAGE 12, AND PLAT BOOK 10, PAGE 33, ALL IN THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY; THENCE NORTH 89052'20" WEST, ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID PLAT OF RIVIERA ESTATES, A DISTANCE OF 683.12 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID PLAT; THENCE SOUTH 00°16'43" WEST, ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID RIVIERA ESTATES, A DISTANCE OF 320.46 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 9 OF THE PLAT OF INDIAN RIVER MALL — THE MALL SUBDIVISION, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 14, PAGE 59, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA; THENCE ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID LOT 9, FOR THE FOLLOWING TWELVE (12) COURSES: NORTH 89045'00" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 917.66 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE NORTH 47006'42"' WEST, A DISTANCE OF 69.27 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE NORTH 57°51'42"' WEST, A DISTANCE OF 330.00 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE NORTH 32°08'18" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 122.35 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE NORTH 57°51'42" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 556.50 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE SOUTH 87008'18"' WEST, A DISTANCE OF 550.00 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE NORTH 00014'29" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 143.38 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE NORTH 89°45'31" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 770.02 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE SOUTH 00014'29" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 230.00 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE NORTH 89°45'31" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 250.00 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE NORTH 44°45'31" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 35.36 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE NORTH 00°14'29" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 424.77 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. CONTAINING 40.25 ACRES is changed from PDTND, Planned Development Traditional Neighborhood Design District to RM -8, Multiple -Family Residential District (up to 8 units per acre). 154 All with the meaning and intent and as set forth and described in said Land Development Regulations. This ordinance shall become effective upon filing with the Department of State. Approved and adopted by the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida, on this 20th day of April, 2021. This ordinance was advertised in the Press -Journal on the 4th day of April 2021, for a public hearing to be held on the 20th day of April, 2021 at which time it was moved for adoption by Commissioner , seconded by , and adopted by the following vote: Joseph E. Flescher, , Chairman Peter D. O'Bryan, Vice Chairman Susan Adams, Commissioner Joseph Earman, Commissioner Laura Moss, Commissioner BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY BY: Joseph E. Flescher, Chairman ATTEST BY: Jeffrey Smith, Clerk Of Circuit Court.and Comptroller This ordinance was filed with the Department of State on the following date: 155 APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGAL SUFFICIENCY William K. DeBraal, Deputy County Attorney APPROVED AS TO PLANNING MATTERS Phillip J. Matson, AICP; Community Development Director FACommunity Development\Rezonings\Sunnyside Up I, LLC - 2008050077-88741\BCC\ADA compliant attachments\A9.doc 156 /P -q- �� N � 0 z 3. N. r+ GHQ fD O 70 C M m Z no C m 00 r r+ n /P -q- �� 9 0 m q� Isc,o-3 • CLCL C (A N (A• 6Q-. N = i M r+ O (n rt =r A r+ m --h r* a) S N N CL 0) r+ A I-, (D —. n N• m Gni A r+ `C - - (D A m -s O :E rD :3 M (A (D inCL -� z CL r+ m CD CL —r.=re —• rD cD r+ ;v o = z No —M 00= r+ — N M A A r =5• C• VA M rt M C. (D 9 0 m q� Isc,o-3 O � N r+ O r+ r+ 0, O A s° M• m CL c A 13 3 N M m O cn O rt loft m 3 �c G cO G m MN m s s MN m m _. -♦, Vol m O O y• m m cn' X O.� < c0i� m N _m O Q• MO A M O � A �m Cr O O m CL O < Q m O m M r+ • T m t2. O B m M, Cr O 9� O O CL _f m m m O • N A m O m m s m n A .O O m m m ul f -h 0 N N N n .O Cr A CL N O • ' w C O O � � O O � N r+ O r+ r+ 0, O A s° M• m CL c A 13 3 N M m O cn O rt loft m 3 �c G cO G m MN m s s MN m m _. -♦, Vol m O O y• m m cn' X O.� < c0i� m N _m O Q• MO A M O � A �m Cr O O m CL O < Q m O m M r+ • T m t2. O B m M, Cr O 9� O O CL _f m m m O • N A m O m m s m n A .O O m m m ul f -h 0 N N N n .O Cr A CL N O • • • A O =� =rO (D Z S m Q. m < �• m y 00 (D 3 =- 0 0 r+ ft< r ' rD �,. s " o X O M � p CD' �_ fD A A � \ °O Be m o 0'. 5• v N r+ CL n N tD N M �D ara' 0 �; = Z o a 0 3• No y r 3 ,� �• r m c m � a) *.W o o<�= °_ � r . M �* o _. CL -Eh n role m m feel ° c O < .gym m�� r+ `A -3 —'� �� — r-� . oo M w � mN r+ v < o o= m m o m�+ gmmq r' 7'° ° �' o M -a f -h c, Z * _. pm3° f+ _ _. 0 �' --h < v z v /A, Is)G-5 • Cr (D rt m mo o_ (D Oma,2. rot O O M 13 m N M S 0 0 0 =- 0 a- m M � o , r h 00 —h M o A � � �• _. r+ r+ C �OM(IQ o ' r• r+ 0. MO O `+ m _. LA -h momh O� r+ o �• w m U1 rl L _ 4 Mr+ 0 O r+ � N � r+ N (DO � — � A C. rw. m 0 m M o a�. —O H N M m M 00 O :• F • m�3�v M = 00 Q (A a) N UQ MT = CL O CL m =r o Gq 3 M 3 �33tot �' < o. _ . m <� 0 (A y o`�0 �m�00 O M�.�CA r+ -� S CU _. m -7h O A Cm v� 0 a, p m CL O r+ �* O --h WO N O 3 3 ILI Ja�-� i �`Y � � 4� R?.�'.ri �.f' afZ b� _ Y � Y x:. ,�i�•W i 'z- hili _ 1 M i - -- >:�ntd�m�+�+adz' � t Cv r ✓^` .?+, g Y a4� �• ��*"'� ��'�r ��e� ��'' � ��e�� INC" 4 � �t � �<�„� i �' �`' � � - - <� � K 3.49 "Fi�tHl Yb3 ��"(C S �+lj�, �p'.'� � � 3 �-0j .�t,^. '' •�,� n` �,... - k off.�`r �� -511227 �ot f s'pp, 7 On ` RE TIP - I PORN AMN o oq p 3:,�'�" }h� r ROT ELM 140 1�t zr "z wcw.,,,a. " sit, 7zkAR C S.i`R am v' e • � � � ��; . �:�� .. .._ .. ��. � , �'' �� - �;u��City of Vero Beach;; CL CA (D �. • OrQ O' C: m Cr CL m 0 m CLm N rt S N Q i IA M rF CL m CL O -t Z 3 CL 0 r'~ i rt Ift m m m 3 O rt m Z UQ S r~ a� m rh O i r+ O fu rt r+ m m CL rF A rh i m rot m m CL m Vf, O rt m A m E CL � v m r rt o �v N N o -• M �• r+ m m a� N L 4 r+ CD C 3 0 E + Z 0 > m 00 ro I e-+- r+ a�•wo,• "CL., 90 CL I . oft 101 rut (D VQ I -co CD (D I N O • m C O 3 m r+ N CD ;o m r+ O r+ m ii 0 3 m s N C� • MMI S 7 M% m m r+ 7A 00, ci O A m A w< r�10 D 3 N (D om qg. /560 )i CL rm#L CD CL C CD O CD m rMIL FD -3 M U) C Oil O, 0, a � 1 � 1 CD �1 01 �1 CD C � �1 - •I rNIL n =rO 2 0 CL r O -� CD O !MI` 0 ■ 0 m WN X CD CD CD 13 rMIL CD cn O rMI: O -� N _. O rMIL �m CD � tn, r-q-IL O CD L.i CD 0 !■■I` O r v 1Pq, 15-6 -12- TI • qr rel' O � n fD e-+ CD M C (D �. o D N N r) S n O r+ T • rein m n r'L o Ln 3 M c° r+ 3 f�D N O 0 rD O m 0 cr ��+ N -n • a C fl+ C m C r D C m C o Seems CD N � < W (. D 90 n O TI e-+ fD Q C CD T m Q m 0 ENNI . n N W 90 N N mPb Ln T r. fD O (A r+ m O Cr A m r+ Re (DD N r+ lllr\ r+ S (D 1141n-l� • O 1 r+ V) O V) =3 . orq CL m 0 3 3 O m 3 0 3 m Ln T M 3 M r+ M O 5�I_,j L • O 3 0 Ln —h Q 0 3 M rn O Ln O Qn X rot fu fl+ Be M M 3 M r+ M O .0 9 r� a M n r+ [i 0 qq, /S(p -/� i N n O O r+ =r �. —. m cn 0 M� CD � � cD n o < V + r c„ O Cl N CL 0 7v S N m n �< N' m _ O � f+ O �+ �. 3 r �M N o �� o Mme— < somme cu (D =+ om — o o M r' n c� yr N � �e • f+ s� m 0 MOO a'; m A CL rt 0 �• 0 �AE 0 C. CL i m m m r+ h CL m m O 0) A r+ /?9, i5b- l(� M 0 CLr)c � �- m. (D D CL _. . M CD �M � o fu to 0 r -t o N� 3 m _. O -• M M � �. A rr+ 0 -• cli 0� CL m < C. A m �• O'Q 0. O r CL F c m FL rD -• V) ca r+ r) rt r+ m V) elm 13 n C fD r+ 0 m m 3 m — rt OrQ • f+ s� m 0 MOO a'; m A CL rt 0 �• 0 �AE 0 C. CL i m m m r+ h CL m m O 0) A r+ /?9, i5b- l(� L City of Vero Beach . . 0 o o c� ^�,* ,O•a �, Er S O G) M go _ O D vo CO Z c� cn @ go v M N o v �go �. rn C N o -� O (nM � �- o Q �, m m Cn -. -4� cQ < O U) CD 3 v a O :3O N C O �1 : C O vO O ;0 OO ;u :3 . ;:p C'1 O c rn cD O O ND M Z. O 0 3 O a' C' Cr CD IV2. ISCa-l� c • G � Q CL =I �. 3 0 (� =r r+ m C n 0 m -0 r) M r+ 0 Q0 i N � N m 00 N. 00 m 0 rt =r m CD Q r O m �v CQ CL A m 0. 3 cr i rt Cl) cn :• CD CL m — w h CD i. CD CQ G Z rt CD CL CD m —i CT3D `Ci m 3 •0 V O Q � to � a rr N L m m m p C F•i F� dq� QO rr m : -%. Grq ._. cr -% CO M Ln cn _a m �' m e M M M � w — N W M 90 � U7 �„ r N + 1-4 � IV f < 3 O O :3 ul N m. m N C m r+ cn O O � cr N 3 cr i rt Cl) cn :• CD CL m — w h CD i. CD CQ G Z rt CD CL CD m Q 0 a° 57 In cr co CD to V* 0 z 03 10 = CL 15' se WEI 20' F, T c 0 0 0 CA �. • IMD a) a:uu • CL • MMI • \ti • • m • • \\ . • n n 0 Vf r+ � cr C� (D (� rF � X n v�' N r"F Ln O r-+ �_ S H ` Q O 0 � m m CL 1 W n 0 3 n , Ipq, /S & -) 0 ou n n 0) O C m r+ s m MN m N O Ml m m r+ r+ O r) 0 (D O N 00 (n v m z r+ O 4�li v o rr N O Ul ou n n 0) O C m r+ s m MN m N O Ml m m r+ r+ O r) N A O -t 00 (n ou n n 0) O C m r+ s m MN m N O Ml m m r+ r+ O =r go+ (rQ m CL 1g. iso -�1 r) N O O r r+ O*Q n r+ O 3 CL -. o r+ �- cD =r go+ (rQ m CL 1g. iso -�1 fig. r56 as im _0 0 11 0 (D CL -0 cu (D CL 0 (D rnC 0 0 3 Treasure Coast New. PART OF THE USA TODAY NETWORK Indian River Press Journal 1801 U.S. 1, Vero Beach, FI -32960 AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION 0 INDIAN RIVER CO PLANNING 1801 27TH ST VERO BEACH, FL 32960 ATTN KATHY CHAREST RECi STATE OF WISCONSIN COUNTY OF BROWN Before the undersigned authority personally appeared, said legal clerk, who on oath says that he is a legal clerk of the Indian River Press Journal, a daily newspaper published at Vero Beach in Indian River County, Florida: that the attached copy of advertisement was published in the Indian River Press Journal in the following issues below. Affiant further says that the said Indian River Press Journal is a newspaper published in Vero Beach in said Indian River County, Florida, and that said newspaper has heretofore been continuously published in said Indian River County, Florida, daily and distributed in Indian River County, Florida, for a period of one year next preceding the first publication of the attached copy of advertisement ; and affiant further says that she has neither paid or promised any person, firm or corporation any + discount , rebate, commission or refund for the purpose of securing this advertisement for publication in the said newspaper. The Indian River Press Journal has been entered as Periodical Matter at the Post Offices in Vero Beach, Indian River County, Florida and has been for a period of one year next preceding the first publication of the attached copy of advertisement. 4!412021 Subscribed and sworn to before on April 4th, 2021 Notary, State of WI, County of Brown TARA MONDLOCH Notary Public. State of Wisconsin My commission expires: August 6, 2021 Publication Cost: $315.00 Ad No: GC10619393 Customer No: 463755 PO#: PUBLIC NOTICE ACOMMUNITY mvsCOPIMENT 1q. 15b -A BEFORE THE BOARD OF COUNTY. COMMISSIONERS OF _ INDIAN RIVER COUNTY NOTICE OF REZONING - PUBLIC HEARING The Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County. Florida, will consider the adoption of a county ordinance rezoning land within the unincorporated portion of Indian River County. A public hearing at which parties in interest and citizens shall have an opportunity to be heard. will be held on Tuesday, April 20, 2021. at 9:00 a.m. in the County Commission Chambers of the County Administration Building, Building A, located at 1801 27th Street, Vero Beach, Florida. The proposed ordinance to rezone the subject property is entitled: AN ORDINANCE OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA. AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE AND THE ACCOMPANYING ZONING MAP FOR APPROXIMATELY ±40.25 ACRES LOCATED SOUTH OF AND ADJACENT TO 26th STREET APPROXIMATELY +/- 775 FEET EAST OF 66th AVENUE AND APPROXIMATELY +/- 700 FEET WEST OF 58th AVENUE AND NORTH OF THE INDIAN RIVER MALL, FROM PDTND, PLANNED DEVELOPMENT TRADITIONAL NEIGHBORHOOD DESIGN, TO RM -8, MULTIPLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (UP TO 8 UNITS PER ACRE); AND PROVIDING CODIFICATION, SEVERABILITY, AND EFFECTIVE DATE. The rezoning application may be inspected by the public at the Community Development Department of the County Administration Building A, located at 1801 27th Street, Vero Beach, Florida, between the hours of 8:30 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. on weekdays. For more information, contact Matt Kalap at (772) 226-1243. The Board of County Commissioners may adopt another zoning district, other than the district requested, provided that the adopted zoning district is consistent with the county's comprehensive plan. Anyone who may wish to appeal any decision that may be made at this meeting will need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is based. Anyone who needs a special accommodation for this meeting must contact the County's Americans with Disabilities Act Coordinator at (772) 226-1223, at least 48 hours in advance of the meeting. Indian River County Board of County Commissioners By: -s- Joseph E. Flescher, , Chairman Existing Zoning Map Sunnyside Up 1, LLC Rezoning Request RS -6 RS 3 rl v ITT" g '. n R5-3 PO'sF1it7tY RMS $`t2M r ti M6 �� ; RS 6� RM -8 Q!iL1iL:i RM 6 � G � jCG CG n a • CG A'' ' 93 +/= 40.25Acids _ sRM17W, s lwl N —uw� nue ��_ r6dgta,PUTNO ry-RNI & ,r TCPALM.COM 1 SUNDAY. APPIL 1•)411 : It mor tDYt(r Er B•d IrtHT... ADVERTISEMENT FOR NOS INDIAN RIVER COUNTY Sy• iomriIndtAA Nmr CWnly until Lp4 9. ]Di,�nFaall CWaa.Ii beyvVb- m:H,d ' a ..'ad ,nmlop. and UUR heal IIIc Nmr e aimeH pelf i0z�ioic su.ifn Ufl> RO,p 1A_ Impmrtmrn[- 4%. bc> ihou:0 le oae2 ntetl P,,Nnninq Oi>h-CIA tpp0 , )[•• S:rr611 Vme ,H Il Fla Wa eldf sal be -,as cE1I- XV , Nf eN d ehw ). B D.M1L. onrine day pn�r,J ,EA.aa a �omeeredat<rp:<d. epenr as l i.1 ,d ro�lomanl 'nlHd dnd :I t pa< Irrmm w 'Iof mo'om.wr"d cp[ur. naq ISere,o. :e0:ei eP : : ar q �,oia<w,v n Saida: Gen' .: N:FJWaSnu�H rgen<.nrDapvrvnrn,irtuope ,•w:aw:ing. mNr t m• 'i -F.11 q1. b. Gritterini oic D. W. a, a ✓< 1.9c rga.tom. 411 nnperrls may wbmh enc al CN EiU pr+W a A Imlf pea .;are %vm�n �: ,�`:• f. teak n rine e dr VVldlad I�asc1 „11 mcn�f BSD r5f-rx- 4 f.,dTrw,«be mDIni So m B1 an Au Do[umem a31G BN onIf PELF >rwud by :ne B',WM aM bt a 4vY�lird t r, rr tntfrd �nS e• anyOSanlra.. -t rilld` en do b.dnE rn the Ssne of HD 1,i IF, Bid Sr<uriry ,II M rn ": m dl na Ir mM.n (Syr .5 is, ai l r n.. aorsnnr,nrk Tn� e e io ineran enemy a .11. Cemmifsix: Nf. M I••f Wena IN Con::ict deivaI. is to ^e BacUrr, S avis Cenira0 ni,n IN, Ca ;,rvi.. lu•nlah �F k" :d al NUG$ e`r. W low aro nn it n,Nn Mr aI 'v n- N", coumy. If ab0er tats ,o do so. U'e FW s«v'in- Mal M rl:a.nt0 by a}es and m: n cr,Dry. t,. earmv :runs Ise rrgnl o halo o .,v clod e•f " �n!)y (t91 daeh, Ise okne rnp//. 1 r'an.ef l t'd, irdvnoly<is. !n SHIN M aenr ,hr Ns[ .,,e•eU o' ImANn F-1 County. Florae. e CPunV%• w tuber Y L:OJM :a bill pre -r.- all AIf al-WAIIIIATORY gcpic Y be h. d on M01W),I`PpN -9. x0)1 H 1 :00AM; o it a• IS,, SIN s: SW. ♦ 6ia.1, ibr:da. )15v2. w FIAANCf Ai MIS CONE ERU:CE 5 IGMLT EN- COURAGED. A_=f illv np: Oe Mlommtr r, INDIAN RIVER CC.— B)' lar.n.ler rtydY RrnA'ati.W'a,aSe: IC'A:a657a1 Iminn .11i,.V1 nl b053 r[.1 mo ell"rlcrio+. uci7 FfP'PYo�Pepe+a ancw.l P,Ipel li:..7".-C pn Hwa D•Ivkl .1 Pdi,n (olnly r,Quesrr u xbr, Iu aaFS;ddereewh fanlM xua xtemaed sreP, el won Ou•Icox a,d rrtrnr o! :frau hrcun Ler pro MJ i.4- ,n nn, POOF REPAIR`AND MAIWINI-C_ m, o`,, ,1 m ",m:i, w„nm •I, f.x1 t,wh,l ill nxa s, Asfm c n:Y . rtn�n n>rl �n•�i ns ealCovrl:5. ��erfe, rw'1 r.4pPea modes,rd ane bxrr C Ire ma'mr,y r,;,n Vr. F. M•alman fin'ews TMrdrrtnq In,bunien rnad<J IremaOM.ncSla�Cer- ma,rmrmUe�,anUt-ar`�um oR1 d/ <en:iOry leH (,.rte. le Dalrmme GCil,0) S`nf. M c-., .Gn:rlr CII { r Adifl r aro, NOTE: AL: E"T1EC SIVE BI ptEill C .-O HITS ARE KIT I. CCN1ACTULNYD"NW.3EI W 3Er O[ THE SNRCrr STAFF AN IKE SCIMSPECT OTHER THAN TME SPECIFIED CON TACT PERSON. ViaE's a rMeura9ed nt r - o ConMRal Jt•II�•xde Ci!�Oil. W n,,:w R)2) SSa50S0 N --las"'. T<ealm ""I" Api Pvdnh: Apra a, }0}: TCNaE]rIJ:O BOARD 01 COUNTY COM ISSIONERS PEOVEST FOR WOUNTYOOLLSA Sealetl Proc Is rd I Se w 'u A ,1 M Awt.w:S Ow I. 2.0o Vuyyir A nw. fon Pie•x, it a1.9R1. .ad.-.,. slay B. Iexl, 1 n bitlde Th. board [ .a - q and all Cbl; wual.Da in pa•: won a pl- IF— dn- c«IF— F oolul :which herr Me I,,? Es. nE. RIO. Bid 0r 11, and c h r agrWeb Slee n hNyYAvarn.f11 OonN(rrmFror}INeer NnmsUw M- oats o' Cmm,y Cxmitlian• Sc lair 111 ,Fbn0a ay' -111 � ne, HrnnM. P1.9 TCN05u7l362TI320x1 Public NDSkas IN, UC NOTICE OF OCS MEETING zlrsl2on ozs cousduoATEo The OF oil cnSI Sudr 4 0, an10 �ngia CFEI1. Har, C `irew(.D•rgsC'rrn79npu; steam bw• �r.rP.a 'NI. A-,-> I AWroa:• ma41y SLoOQDW Ger ]ear of cfedi ^4 h rveaade ,o INr ry tN Im0rovrmino IN, VI emhi, l- ddxem , Ne C1ty. Slice tun y mm: br ee fe, one of ,re Id-m:mg namnte+: 1e,k Pr . To aid ^ ine Prremion diminali0 1 ,Tums a dight; dzvNepmm! nada al •par• INIar -trey 4«au� r ' Ing <a d.iims serb<w and nvn<d:He :hma: to M. h<aun a >velbrr of ,rr <nm- IN.n npn <f Mrn hole v 1M COSG WAD""'. den eie�tve•gloibot !code aetl I-:.. rMabdH�oH : Oevelopmer.,. and .IderNopmerr. nl rrMn <ial H SpttiG, , 0ae w11 arg1.tn n e xfpro,.4.1 reads Ga ad..; l of xmH haea an •m <:al � an hAd.m i aL a• jeo �.. q ..nsl�rgr�.in w• n< t taenl .rto:n:. Sondes..2!l Allam, pl apt Ada,D las i,, -- i.1 re- q�,piTa ,ne nnM ni uLa�dei brat 1-Nilyd, a . IV— n.i::nq, The Ctty FlrRl"I. rxome U:Irm ane 9geeM Y Prrelk in w c08G FIT is Mei bmbTem. C oxen. a M< CRT el pan s, tV,W IN. eVr-mY2eleii l`t`IIf1 (Punta Cham::ns Ill ).W. Pnn S, la i BHe. Pon Ss Lu. ce. xOxl a i,1 x�, n d,ereahe• Pasf�de. M r•rlaw.armn < Mub mh`w�Ire, bins n is lAafla Comm j1 ,y weq•ann am•mdrne, Inn^• ;77b R],.TS95 a,mai: fa9ri,y,A lnr p+dn mw,mq is bnnq Public NDti(eq OTTO:ORTR-RCE NCT CE OF PUBOC HEAFSNG TM al, kna: m :"e Cil, I F INeNa, ibrida, pure••, Io 5,1lion 103, of chN nfa.Ra ;I :ne MowayH AC•il " }0I nab pudic N Ings n Ili, CRT Mai (nmmUSUsn CA,mbHL 100 NonN JS t-ignwa 1, For, pkrce. Honda, a: tr �r al- ]aycwn vat.1FIN jolmv'i,y: apnm- 1J;001'rcs,ian Mr corkfi,lenal N. wi:N Ns Fam Comlm:,len A., I a lin m.y - I< Fall, N mal re,PMrrtyo :lane A.- tulii aamR bar aj pli,mxtlp ) n :N Ciry CkA't oHI", City If. ICO NorM us NipN. av l for:=:.rct. Fbrta. r litA3 11UPINIG 10 Ap FfA; TIIE DECISION Or THE CITY (OM•.uSf,CN AS TO THE EOREGOrNG IE ADVISED TNAT A AECOID OF 1101"UINGi CH .PPEA,, AND THAI SUCH at& SON htaY NEED to ENSURE THAT A WRBATIM RECORD of paOCEFO,mi IS MME IN- OV]MGt TESTIMONY D W.EN-E VON W'IdH C THE AFH AI If 101E BASED. 1n acrore.n< YAM In.Aan.ri. se♦;IN cwbd:Un and r;i n xEE( xq Hn•iu [sae .nlq fon I'll Cbam0"Na aayy Ucipa eo In IIsi, Or+^ I Oer Ne01(r Ala[ 1772,),CE]-3053 a[ Iq,[ U Inca tod.m N'. FLLbw :�. Caa, CN, Oak daH •x: Nb .Fyeel a.)dlt TCNC6131. CITY OF SEBASTIAN, FL Rpvnl ler Heposala ITB ax1W1 tarilanrnerrwt lo. romre µrya, aerebemeAt and 1 •A• rtpait n Sebaa- I.^ Manliwl Nrpon Re Cry .1 Sebasdan IF r IRE,oroq m halrom 9wnhed Cennane-a{pnsuurien tom. ne n nrl bpm<n: YVladeU Mt pot e A ale I� eco . Is ` a.t,l, n FI, AIX- k, rrle<Kw - CIA 7„enc e�r,�wGu: Public Notice <an Ilemrm[H* ;ate w «- Nei( w pa e•m apeme-1 >ylltm. N I Snd�ded : Me + e0 h ,M re of he fpnaN awlax of LRDx.;.N of 'aimay •A' avrm H tan R,mwava3f any mn fa 3' a DNI,, wd-fix.. ITR DUE DATE Gtr, 5. EOE, as Ldp PM E5T A ROfFLRANDATORY Ne•5o• li[itadon M W wal b. hdd Z111'00 AM ESr on Apel t D31 in IM City Hap C,u A Cn.mbtrt t 1175 Nal" Sveeb S.1.1- Fwk. "x55. A site rail will br [ery duned.Ilm the rr 411 AE 1NOUTS - All i id. «ry Evmiry Nn R0 IN., oMY br ened to YNserOciryolxba nr.no•q [ASTDAY FOR OUESTtONS: Asl7 1.. 2021 by rw of li.i DOCUMEIETS: Sdidtad^n da[ .0 a be dmvnloab orm,�a o m. un: ,burr. ds all aAd VII Rd..mt.lom Ire Ildeax Dw: Aprtl s, x021 BID SU5MKSq[b OMC. altopud at O-ymHall"f Veil + wrm•.lilyofscbasuvLmy , l dr Nlal[ on thb ISP antl o,Pr, bid Dppwl,mm�. INOUIFIES - AV in"uirin «ry Sslog tN, rtR MYI only be erf d to YrnnOthyolxba s41norg. DOCL•MENTS: Solicha,Icn 4- ois be OwMcad 0, a dS,.,,Anilfs lbsit.. vtndwdnL.lom. rte RY.ax DRI: <pN x ]9n RID 5U3MI5m. ON par .V bMfslonf • RI x a«epted at Cly HIM Vi111 wew.[Nyo/x� Uaaayy bids ser bkolroommNdl w aurora bid ., Dub,vil7-17. ]OxI 1CfKi]7111 ce of fon Harx Nol%e of iariaiWr. IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF IMF NNET[ENTM IUDICI<L CIROI,rt W AND OR ST. LUGS COVAnY, FLORIDA CIRCUIT COUNT CASE NO: 2021G SPA IN RE- FORFEOURE CF X111 BMSVJ 01YOIli ORT PIERCE n l,wel Use Fon R1- Polke Dewrncem. Hai.IH KENNEDY FMCINALD LUMP - KIN, SR OaimanL KOTICE C1 ACTION FOR FOR. PHIN,1E PROCEEDINGS TO Alt E.som OR El"Ws IrAMNG OR O.AIMDIG TO HAVE ANY NGIrt, TITLE OR I NTRBI N THE PROPERTY HE tn. DfscR1RED: Du ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED Ihn. an.LSCA P"_, Ie IN. florid. Cor-wi,, ,cl_ A'. nM hero I:bd by allblill CUT al Fat -1- nn b.h.:i of INe,Fon 1`11111 P0. - ,I- C.,,". 5-INl [e Covml• yyler fxlrryhua Eben n 1; D.Vafs`IRedRI` ,Ph d nods ,nr aboprap1- aDind Io co— . Ce„n in 3,. Lan c<wH N, rtarba, la mr %rd ,' of F.dli:uve .11. IN. abaue-Oe• try due goof inatf1enM�G au[ sed in it'.1ml- al Flaw"' I— dealiryw:thronvab1C pu.wanl t thrid. dw v,Vale Icrhl:u•e ACL - Haturnlx.70)IGI1. HiNid, As 'Hlry City <Narr.y M V..�. FL 3:9511 Rnnw,h hMtr. Te.nryodrynl 7A.onon� OIIl.s1.6Eo0 II u Feta area Nil. won a Las .by w,p lc em any u[om �. (n p.nippnt in „clog, Far n'o n[. cede at n1` [a, ro Yo- m. prmobn a <er�enmaln�r[t. aim.Y Suit, 111. Pon sl. FI 9EG. 1111I 110170.UI0. O. If It }ye�U.a un ]15.9 o- +.wi<e im pub: p,0 4 L 11, 3011 ICN<E10150 thrice of Salt P-" Pt • $' ,lin ..are al E301 SE SI— FL 3[907 new,NnnC I<,e set c(ti• parry I«red at me Fa. Ly 1M LYcav lis: of O[• on IN, I— wriaIXlt ear H ar o"Fll AaT., w ar .Irtd ,ncnr;,r r dlx•iI. Der nH s r" neuxne'W grwdfoa •d Iamfle ;ice 1,10.2mccm 'rq Carlon a-. i lion. Ili.— r' im Cll.;,. ,fy .Mme[ n 0.0. IES i rmf and -41m., H,Pha W6F. laSna[klel P•tl b See rNnagHfor dnadl. 8001; Elk Gat.1• unit 11081; NO MHrN a, 11,202' Taut ar.hel uAN NO3e, RN TCN16SO411 xlr may IN vaithdr:a.n as .rN NOTICE OF MIFUC HEARING-SPEOM EXCEPTION USE TNh it nmk. el • Wdk MMSnq el 1.+1 Indian I4vrr Cc - Bond of Cpanry Canmislianrn Ip co al grandag SPICY .4 le0,bn ,Ae apyyr I far Ma tomValicn o1 an fP: Yml:kal ,.Neratlan I.RiN (, IoM ro be loxxd at msS 9th Sv SIV; S«lien x9, Townmip 115. RfA,. 5)E. If.. .. IF. Had. ed lowdcn maG. A Wd'a hear« �n whits pWa 1 in i ""s a ! [iYitm iNll E an WP .ny to be NarnA, wdl he herd CWnry CcmmiNfaners 1 Indies I,. Counmtyy, FIn i �" 1he eum':IrnOrynp.ElO[smo n N'_e vr°c 6ein FIinil:"� TVetd.y. AprR 30, 111 Y 9.00 am. HenH 6re<I N nringarinw eUtni ,D,hr Cunrnt 0emt"0 m H.rmhy SeNcn at ))x -x161690. An davmrms Aenain nn 1n ,Isis �un nr Ella In the Ind4n Nver Cwny Ham IDNis-1 .ted n IB01 ]Tr4 SN<n aN:hi, buatlinq •A' o' Nevedf�ly mem'maeriNor�tl a F'. 0,rin Dau I pusinni ovri� NI __, o, the WLIk M. ImitW to.:tew and Panrdptla rn the Public Mmtnq. ill mntlenal l, mee!in4 .wilt apexed ,o mw eklh I arrnballm ed of ,he Fruredrg is d.. 1,,Nih Incn.ieF ,n4mony aw rberae upon wli[, Me .,P" h bnM ANYONE WHO NEEDS A SPECIAL ACCOMMODATION OR THS FETING MUST CONTACT THE COUNTY'S AMERICA!:S LMTr. DISABILITIES ACT (ADAI CODRDINATOR A- 2241125 AT LEAST M HOURS IN ADVANCE OF THE MEERNG. INDIAN RIVER CO- so EUFlexherM>ry'SyNTP3 1 y PubGdc AAAI4. x0)i'.__.......... ..._........ . TCNai53,96 OkTDHE 771E. RQ4ISp_Df:LQJ;Pjj1 G!?A.LlASS1Q«E1E5 �1 y]JCE OF Rj,7.0 B\nl.\FG - PURE IC I IEARf\G T. B[wrd M Cpun Commis<ienen rat InJian If-, C -nm Ilonda, %ill eonsidtt the Pduplion of a cwmr Drdi'm n iog,ad M,hinlhcpnin<mpnmmd ry,ni^n of Indian Rian County- APnNich rbav ufiich park, and wit- y1W1 hVpp.,I-i[y lu be hn�:•J,h an %9li he hcld en 71Nsday. -Ap:EI VI, YCI. m 9:01a.m. in 1M Co Fy CcHiVI r. Cn.mbcra a III• Counlr Adm\em ia&Rusi, F1.nlorida. 1le ,. FIwd at INDI ?i 11 $«,t- r,pnad nrdil;aa. In rcrmM: RIM cn4;.. PNpnly a amlkh,l. AN ORDINANCE OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY.. FLORIDA. AMENDING TIIE I:OVING ORDINANCE AND THE AC('OMISANYING ZONING \IAP FOR APPROXIMATELY 2411.;$ ACRES LOCATED SO= 017 AND ADJACI:'\-1' TO 26M SiTRELF AIM'RUNI MATELS' +A 775 FEET T!AST OF Isms, AITNUE AND APPROXIMATELY M. 70) FEET %vFST OF MIN.. AVENUE AND NORTH OF THE INDIAN RIVER SCALL FROM PDTNO. PLANNED DEVELOPMENT TRADITIONAL NEIGHBORHOOD DESIGN. '10 RSI -S. StL UIPLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRI('T IOPTON I NITS PER ACRE]: AND PRUVIDING CODIFICATION. SEVERABILITY.. AND EF'FECIIS'E!)A'1"E. The g urplir:Ni". may b• m -r-1.1 by lb, !Nn4. al IAC CDmmpnily 1), 1., fmml I31W. I .Y the CS1Ptt,aAtiFlmui BuihFhf.a,mTOrA•n., L CIyi,rnkfhauI4rNnu3.:ralot'ntnISN.:UaWI mu2s7.:mnth and3:D4p,,da� \taRAspv 17' 2,32a lL47:. 'Ill. Itna,d r.f C•,unly ('ommi<uuavn mV, odgl: n Ibcrring Jistril. n,her Man the Jirtrin .yuu•Inl. pmaidc:lethal III.•aduP«d Rnp ingduirki Iaixm wdl-th If, ....PA15:.cmnpreh<misa plan. AVWn, eke FP wish In Pp,, 1 am' M-isiavl IhV n HG male Pt this meetia^ %ill nrrJ In <n<ure IR r a txThati,n I of IN, pA¢c<.imy is NI de, unli, m1,We> Ihr Yxn.•ny anJ svi,kno ulvn Mikb the ppp,%I isha M. :A,qv %iru ra -[], a •I�ccJ eVx..n,id.6w fur Ihis D'eclinynr uFt -r Ihr Ernntyt Am<rinn< lath iNrhilhin .-lel Cn n1 n:nnr 111 I'7-)?Sbl_?.:n foal Ja hour. i0 aJYanc<uf the nu•,•Iin} IaJian Kilar ('n,ml! Rlurnl of Crwnly l'nmmiuinncn fly. -s• J..,b E. Iaax+ r. Cnnkl:l:ul %Inn+,sq t, llcwu.:-r.rya,n .r.--- ' ULA i .T,�i.}�Ja'•'S�- S �.a is IF r Wi �S [ Flea •..,,I.... 1. Mr Kti `°111 Fi:ass ifieds.tepalm.com ro•+M«N;,N;=dI :EVdFddsay Classifies WsaH R • FtiFep,n mor tDYt(r Er B•d IrtHT... ADVERTISEMENT FOR NOS INDIAN RIVER COUNTY Sy• iomriIndtAA Nmr CWnly until Lp4 9. ]Di,�nFaall CWaa.Ii beyvVb- m:H,d ' a ..'ad ,nmlop. and UUR heal IIIc Nmr e aimeH pelf i0z�ioic su.ifn Ufl> RO,p 1A_ Impmrtmrn[- 4%. bc> ihou:0 le oae2 ntetl P,,Nnninq Oi>h-CIA tpp0 , )[•• S:rr611 Vme ,H Il Fla Wa eldf sal be -,as cE1I- XV , Nf eN d ehw ). B D.M1L. onrine day pn�r,J ,EA.aa a �omeeredat<rp:<d. epenr as l i.1 ,d ro�lomanl 'nlHd dnd :I t pa< Irrmm w 'Iof mo'om.wr"d cp[ur. naq ISere,o. :e0:ei eP : : ar q �,oia<w,v n Saida: Gen' .: N:FJWaSnu�H rgen<.nrDapvrvnrn,irtuope ,•w:aw:ing. mNr t m• 'i -F.11 q1. b. Gritterini oic D. W. a, a ✓< 1.9c rga.tom. 411 nnperrls may wbmh enc al CN EiU pr+W a A Imlf pea .;are %vm�n �: ,�`:• f. teak n rine e dr VVldlad I�asc1 „11 mcn�f BSD r5f-rx- 4 f.,dTrw,«be mDIni So m B1 an Au Do[umem a31G BN onIf PELF >rwud by :ne B',WM aM bt a 4vY�lird t r, rr tntfrd �nS e• anyOSanlra.. -t rilld` en do b.dnE rn the Ssne of HD 1,i IF, Bid Sr<uriry ,II M rn ": m dl na Ir mM.n (Syr .5 is, ai l r n.. aorsnnr,nrk Tn� e e io ineran enemy a .11. Cemmifsix: Nf. M I••f Wena IN Con::ict deivaI. is to ^e BacUrr, S avis Cenira0 ni,n IN, Ca ;,rvi.. lu•nlah �F k" :d al NUG$ e`r. W low aro nn it n,Nn Mr aI 'v n- N", coumy. If ab0er tats ,o do so. U'e FW s«v'in- Mal M rl:a.nt0 by a}es and m: n cr,Dry. t,. earmv :runs Ise rrgnl o halo o .,v clod e•f " �n!)y (t91 daeh, Ise okne rnp//. 1 r'an.ef l t'd, irdvnoly<is. !n SHIN M aenr ,hr Ns[ .,,e•eU o' ImANn F-1 County. Florae. e CPunV%• w tuber Y L:OJM :a bill pre -r.- all AIf al-WAIIIIATORY gcpic Y be h. d on M01W),I`PpN -9. x0)1 H 1 :00AM; o it a• IS,, SIN s: SW. ♦ 6ia.1, ibr:da. )15v2. w FIAANCf Ai MIS CONE ERU:CE 5 IGMLT EN- COURAGED. A_=f illv np: Oe Mlommtr r, INDIAN RIVER CC.— B)' lar.n.ler rtydY RrnA'ati.W'a,aSe: IC'A:a657a1 Iminn .11i,.V1 nl b053 r[.1 mo ell"rlcrio+. uci7 FfP'PYo�Pepe+a ancw.l P,Ipel li:..7".-C pn Hwa D•Ivkl .1 Pdi,n (olnly r,Quesrr u xbr, Iu aaFS;ddereewh fanlM xua xtemaed sreP, el won Ou•Icox a,d rrtrnr o! :frau hrcun Ler pro MJ i.4- ,n nn, POOF REPAIR`AND MAIWINI-C_ m, o`,, ,1 m ",m:i, w„nm •I, f.x1 t,wh,l ill nxa s, Asfm c n:Y . rtn�n n>rl �n•�i ns ealCovrl:5. ��erfe, rw'1 r.4pPea modes,rd ane bxrr C Ire ma'mr,y r,;,n Vr. F. M•alman fin'ews TMrdrrtnq In,bunien rnad<J IremaOM.ncSla�Cer- ma,rmrmUe�,anUt-ar`�um oR1 d/ <en:iOry leH (,.rte. le Dalrmme GCil,0) S`nf. M c-., .Gn:rlr CII { r Adifl r aro, NOTE: AL: E"T1EC SIVE BI ptEill C .-O HITS ARE KIT I. CCN1ACTULNYD"NW.3EI W 3Er O[ THE SNRCrr STAFF AN IKE SCIMSPECT OTHER THAN TME SPECIFIED CON TACT PERSON. ViaE's a rMeura9ed nt r - o ConMRal Jt•II�•xde Ci!�Oil. W n,,:w R)2) SSa50S0 N --las"'. T<ealm ""I" Api Pvdnh: Apra a, }0}: TCNaE]rIJ:O BOARD 01 COUNTY COM ISSIONERS PEOVEST FOR WOUNTYOOLLSA Sealetl Proc Is rd I Se w 'u A ,1 M Awt.w:S Ow I. 2.0o Vuyyir A nw. fon Pie•x, it a1.9R1. .ad.-.,. slay B. Iexl, 1 n bitlde Th. board [ .a - q and all Cbl; wual.Da in pa•: won a pl- IF— dn- c«IF— F oolul :which herr Me I,,? Es. nE. RIO. Bid 0r 11, and c h r agrWeb Slee n hNyYAvarn.f11 OonN(rrmFror}INeer NnmsUw M- oats o' Cmm,y Cxmitlian• Sc lair 111 ,Fbn0a ay' -111 � ne, HrnnM. P1.9 TCN05u7l362TI320x1 Public NDSkas IN, UC NOTICE OF OCS MEETING zlrsl2on ozs cousduoATEo The OF oil cnSI Sudr 4 0, an10 �ngia CFEI1. Har, C `irew(.D•rgsC'rrn79npu; steam bw• �r.rP.a 'NI. A-,-> I AWroa:• ma41y SLoOQDW Ger ]ear of cfedi ^4 h rveaade ,o INr ry tN Im0rovrmino IN, VI emhi, l- ddxem , Ne C1ty. Slice tun y mm: br ee fe, one of ,re Id-m:mg namnte+: 1e,k Pr . To aid ^ ine Prremion diminali0 1 ,Tums a dight; dzvNepmm! nada al •par• INIar -trey 4«au� r ' Ing <a d.iims serb<w and nvn<d:He :hma: to M. h<aun a >velbrr of ,rr <nm- IN.n npn <f Mrn hole v 1M COSG WAD""'. den eie�tve•gloibot !code aetl I-:.. rMabdH�oH : Oevelopmer.,. and .IderNopmerr. nl rrMn <ial H SpttiG, , 0ae w11 arg1.tn n e xfpro,.4.1 reads Ga ad..; l of xmH haea an •m <:al � an hAd.m i aL a• jeo �.. q ..nsl�rgr�.in w• n< t taenl .rto:n:. Sondes..2!l Allam, pl apt Ada,D las i,, -- i.1 re- q�,piTa ,ne nnM ni uLa�dei brat 1-Nilyd, a . IV— n.i::nq, The Ctty FlrRl"I. rxome U:Irm ane 9geeM Y Prrelk in w c08G FIT is Mei bmbTem. C oxen. a M< CRT el pan s, tV,W IN. eVr-mY2eleii l`t`IIf1 (Punta Cham::ns Ill ).W. Pnn S, la i BHe. Pon Ss Lu. ce. xOxl a i,1 x�, n d,ereahe• Pasf�de. M r•rlaw.armn < Mub mh`w�Ire, bins n is lAafla Comm j1 ,y weq•ann am•mdrne, Inn^• ;77b R],.TS95 a,mai: fa9ri,y,A lnr p+dn mw,mq is bnnq Public NDti(eq OTTO:ORTR-RCE NCT CE OF PUBOC HEAFSNG TM al, kna: m :"e Cil, I F INeNa, ibrida, pure••, Io 5,1lion 103, of chN nfa.Ra ;I :ne MowayH AC•il " }0I nab pudic N Ings n Ili, CRT Mai (nmmUSUsn CA,mbHL 100 NonN JS t-ignwa 1, For, pkrce. Honda, a: tr �r al- ]aycwn vat.1FIN jolmv'i,y: apnm- 1J;001'rcs,ian Mr corkfi,lenal N. wi:N Ns Fam Comlm:,len A., I a lin m.y - I< Fall, N mal re,PMrrtyo :lane A.- tulii aamR bar aj pli,mxtlp ) n :N Ciry CkA't oHI", City If. ICO NorM us NipN. av l for:=:.rct. Fbrta. r litA3 11UPINIG 10 Ap FfA; TIIE DECISION Or THE CITY (OM•.uSf,CN AS TO THE EOREGOrNG IE ADVISED TNAT A AECOID OF 1101"UINGi CH .PPEA,, AND THAI SUCH at& SON htaY NEED to ENSURE THAT A WRBATIM RECORD of paOCEFO,mi IS MME IN- OV]MGt TESTIMONY D W.EN-E VON W'IdH C THE AFH AI If 101E BASED. 1n acrore.n< YAM In.Aan.ri. se♦;IN cwbd:Un and r;i n xEE( xq Hn•iu [sae .nlq fon I'll Cbam0"Na aayy Ucipa eo In IIsi, Or+^ I Oer Ne01(r Ala[ 1772,),CE]-3053 a[ Iq,[ U Inca tod.m N'. FLLbw :�. Caa, CN, Oak daH •x: Nb .Fyeel a.)dlt TCNC6131. CITY OF SEBASTIAN, FL Rpvnl ler Heposala ITB ax1W1 tarilanrnerrwt lo. romre µrya, aerebemeAt and 1 •A• rtpait n Sebaa- I.^ Manliwl Nrpon Re Cry .1 Sebasdan IF r IRE,oroq m halrom 9wnhed Cennane-a{pnsuurien tom. ne n nrl bpm<n: YVladeU Mt pot e A ale I� eco . Is ` a.t,l, n FI, AIX- k, rrle<Kw - CIA 7„enc e�r,�wGu: Public Notice <an Ilemrm[H* ;ate w «- Nei( w pa e•m apeme-1 >ylltm. N I Snd�ded : Me + e0 h ,M re of he fpnaN awlax of LRDx.;.N of 'aimay •A' avrm H tan R,mwava3f any mn fa 3' a DNI,, wd-fix.. ITR DUE DATE Gtr, 5. EOE, as Ldp PM E5T A ROfFLRANDATORY Ne•5o• li[itadon M W wal b. hdd Z111'00 AM ESr on Apel t D31 in IM City Hap C,u A Cn.mbtrt t 1175 Nal" Sveeb S.1.1- Fwk. "x55. A site rail will br [ery duned.Ilm the rr 411 AE 1NOUTS - All i id. «ry Evmiry Nn R0 IN., oMY br ened to YNserOciryolxba nr.no•q [ASTDAY FOR OUESTtONS: Asl7 1.. 2021 by rw of li.i DOCUMEIETS: Sdidtad^n da[ .0 a be dmvnloab orm,�a o m. un: ,burr. ds all aAd VII Rd..mt.lom Ire Ildeax Dw: Aprtl s, x021 BID SU5MKSq[b OMC. altopud at O-ymHall"f Veil + wrm•.lilyofscbasuvLmy , l dr Nlal[ on thb ISP antl o,Pr, bid Dppwl,mm�. INOUIFIES - AV in"uirin «ry Sslog tN, rtR MYI only be erf d to YrnnOthyolxba s41norg. DOCL•MENTS: Solicha,Icn 4- ois be OwMcad 0, a dS,.,,Anilfs lbsit.. vtndwdnL.lom. rte RY.ax DRI: <pN x ]9n RID 5U3MI5m. ON par .V bMfslonf • RI x a«epted at Cly HIM Vi111 wew.[Nyo/x� Uaaayy bids ser bkolroommNdl w aurora bid ., Dub,vil7-17. ]OxI 1CfKi]7111 ce of fon Harx Nol%e of iariaiWr. IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF IMF NNET[ENTM IUDICI<L CIROI,rt W AND OR ST. LUGS COVAnY, FLORIDA CIRCUIT COUNT CASE NO: 2021G SPA IN RE- FORFEOURE CF X111 BMSVJ 01YOIli ORT PIERCE n l,wel Use Fon R1- Polke Dewrncem. Hai.IH KENNEDY FMCINALD LUMP - KIN, SR OaimanL KOTICE C1 ACTION FOR FOR. PHIN,1E PROCEEDINGS TO Alt E.som OR El"Ws IrAMNG OR O.AIMDIG TO HAVE ANY NGIrt, TITLE OR I NTRBI N THE PROPERTY HE tn. DfscR1RED: Du ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED Ihn. an.LSCA P"_, Ie IN. florid. Cor-wi,, ,cl_ A'. nM hero I:bd by allblill CUT al Fat -1- nn b.h.:i of INe,Fon 1`11111 P0. - ,I- C.,,". 5-INl [e Covml• yyler fxlrryhua Eben n 1; D.Vafs`IRedRI` ,Ph d nods ,nr aboprap1- aDind Io co— . Ce„n in 3,. Lan c<wH N, rtarba, la mr %rd ,' of F.dli:uve .11. IN. abaue-Oe• try due goof inatf1enM�G au[ sed in it'.1ml- al Flaw"' I— dealiryw:thronvab1C pu.wanl t thrid. dw v,Vale Icrhl:u•e ACL - Haturnlx.70)IGI1. HiNid, As 'Hlry City <Narr.y M V..�. FL 3:9511 Rnnw,h hMtr. Te.nryodrynl 7A.onon� OIIl.s1.6Eo0 II u Feta area Nil. won a Las .by w,p lc em any u[om �. (n p.nippnt in „clog, Far n'o n[. cede at n1` [a, ro Yo- m. prmobn a <er�enmaln�r[t. aim.Y Suit, 111. Pon sl. FI 9EG. 1111I 110170.UI0. O. If It }ye�U.a un ]15.9 o- +.wi<e im pub: p,0 4 L 11, 3011 ICN<E10150 thrice of Salt P-" Pt • $' ,lin ..are al E301 SE SI— FL 3[907 new,NnnC I<,e set c(ti• parry I«red at me Fa. Ly 1M LYcav lis: of O[• on IN, I— wriaIXlt ear H ar o"Fll AaT., w ar .Irtd ,ncnr;,r r dlx•iI. Der nH s r" neuxne'W grwdfoa •d Iamfle ;ice 1,10.2mccm 'rq Carlon a-. i lion. Ili.— r' im Cll.;,. ,fy .Mme[ n 0.0. IES i rmf and -41m., H,Pha W6F. laSna[klel P•tl b See rNnagHfor dnadl. 8001; Elk Gat.1• unit 11081; NO MHrN a, 11,202' Taut ar.hel uAN NO3e, RN TCN16SO411 xlr may IN vaithdr:a.n as .rN NOTICE OF MIFUC HEARING-SPEOM EXCEPTION USE TNh it nmk. el • Wdk MMSnq el 1.+1 Indian I4vrr Cc - Bond of Cpanry Canmislianrn Ip co al grandag SPICY .4 le0,bn ,Ae apyyr I far Ma tomValicn o1 an fP: Yml:kal ,.Neratlan I.RiN (, IoM ro be loxxd at msS 9th Sv SIV; S«lien x9, Townmip 115. RfA,. 5)E. If.. .. IF. Had. ed lowdcn maG. A Wd'a hear« �n whits pWa 1 in i ""s a ! [iYitm iNll E an WP .ny to be NarnA, wdl he herd CWnry CcmmiNfaners 1 Indies I,. Counmtyy, FIn i �" 1he eum':IrnOrynp.ElO[smo n N'_e vr°c 6ein FIinil:"� TVetd.y. AprR 30, 111 Y 9.00 am. HenH 6re<I N nringarinw eUtni ,D,hr Cunrnt 0emt"0 m H.rmhy SeNcn at ))x -x161690. An davmrms Aenain nn 1n ,Isis �un nr Ella In the Ind4n Nver Cwny Ham IDNis-1 .ted n IB01 ]Tr4 SN<n aN:hi, buatlinq •A' o' Nevedf�ly mem'maeriNor�tl a F'. 0,rin Dau I pusinni ovri� NI __, o, the WLIk M. ImitW to.:tew and Panrdptla rn the Public Mmtnq. ill mntlenal l, mee!in4 .wilt apexed ,o mw eklh I arrnballm ed of ,he Fruredrg is d.. 1,,Nih Incn.ieF ,n4mony aw rberae upon wli[, Me .,P" h bnM ANYONE WHO NEEDS A SPECIAL ACCOMMODATION OR THS FETING MUST CONTACT THE COUNTY'S AMERICA!:S LMTr. DISABILITIES ACT (ADAI CODRDINATOR A- 2241125 AT LEAST M HOURS IN ADVANCE OF THE MEERNG. INDIAN RIVER CO- so EUFlexherM>ry'SyNTP3 1 y PubGdc AAAI4. x0)i'.__.......... ..._........ . TCNai53,96 OkTDHE 771E. RQ4ISp_Df:LQJ;Pjj1 G!?A.LlASS1Q«E1E5 �1 y]JCE OF Rj,7.0 B\nl.\FG - PURE IC I IEARf\G T. B[wrd M Cpun Commis<ienen rat InJian If-, C -nm Ilonda, %ill eonsidtt the Pduplion of a cwmr Drdi'm n iog,ad M,hinlhcpnin<mpnmmd ry,ni^n of Indian Rian County- APnNich rbav ufiich park, and wit- y1W1 hVpp.,I-i[y lu be hn�:•J,h an %9li he hcld en 71Nsday. -Ap:EI VI, YCI. m 9:01a.m. in 1M Co Fy CcHiVI r. Cn.mbcra a III• Counlr Adm\em ia&Rusi, F1.nlorida. 1le ,. FIwd at INDI ?i 11 $«,t- r,pnad nrdil;aa. In rcrmM: RIM cn4;.. PNpnly a amlkh,l. AN ORDINANCE OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY.. FLORIDA. AMENDING TIIE I:OVING ORDINANCE AND THE AC('OMISANYING ZONING \IAP FOR APPROXIMATELY 2411.;$ ACRES LOCATED SO= 017 AND ADJACI:'\-1' TO 26M SiTRELF AIM'RUNI MATELS' +A 775 FEET T!AST OF Isms, AITNUE AND APPROXIMATELY M. 70) FEET %vFST OF MIN.. AVENUE AND NORTH OF THE INDIAN RIVER SCALL FROM PDTNO. PLANNED DEVELOPMENT TRADITIONAL NEIGHBORHOOD DESIGN. '10 RSI -S. StL UIPLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRI('T IOPTON I NITS PER ACRE]: AND PRUVIDING CODIFICATION. SEVERABILITY.. AND EF'FECIIS'E!)A'1"E. The g urplir:Ni". may b• m -r-1.1 by lb, !Nn4. al IAC CDmmpnily 1), 1., fmml I31W. I .Y the CS1Ptt,aAtiFlmui BuihFhf.a,mTOrA•n., L CIyi,rnkfhauI4rNnu3.:ralot'ntnISN.:UaWI mu2s7.:mnth and3:D4p,,da� \taRAspv 17' 2,32a lL47:. 'Ill. Itna,d r.f C•,unly ('ommi<uuavn mV, odgl: n Ibcrring Jistril. n,her Man the Jirtrin .yuu•Inl. pmaidc:lethal III.•aduP«d Rnp ingduirki Iaixm wdl-th If, ....PA15:.cmnpreh<misa plan. AVWn, eke FP wish In Pp,, 1 am' M-isiavl IhV n HG male Pt this meetia^ %ill nrrJ In <n<ure IR r a txThati,n I of IN, pA¢c<.imy is NI de, unli, m1,We> Ihr Yxn.•ny anJ svi,kno ulvn Mikb the ppp,%I isha M. :A,qv %iru ra -[], a •I�ccJ eVx..n,id.6w fur Ihis D'eclinynr uFt -r Ihr Ernntyt Am<rinn< lath iNrhilhin .-lel Cn n1 n:nnr 111 I'7-)?Sbl_?.:n foal Ja hour. i0 aJYanc<uf the nu•,•Iin} IaJian Kilar ('n,ml! Rlurnl of Crwnly l'nmmiuinncn fly. -s• J..,b E. Iaax+ r. Cnnkl:l:ul %Inn+,sq t, llcwu.:-r.rya,n .r.--- ' ULA i .T,�i.}�Ja'•'S�- S �.a is IF r Wi �S [ Flea •..,,I.... 1. Mr Kti `°111 10-A-5, Public Hearing Indian River County, Florida Department of Utility Services Board Memorandum Date: April 20, 2021 To: Jason E. Brown, County Administrator From: Vincent Burke, PE, Director of Utility Services Subject: North Sebastian Water and Sewer Phase 2, Public Hearing Descriptions and Conditions: On March 09, 2021, the Indian River County Board of County Commissioners (BCC) unanimously approved Resolutions I and Resolutions II for the North Sebastian Water and Sewer Project. The table below summarizes the grant funding obtained for the project: Description Agency Amount FY 2020/2021 Cost Share Grant SJRWMD $ 1,280,818.771 WQ restoration Grant and Amend. 1 FDEP $ 3,250,000.002 Indian River Lagoon Cost Share IRLNEP $ 204,017.693 Total $ 4,734,836.46 1: 1Sewer only 2, 3: These grants to cover both water and sewer costs Analysis: The North Sebastian Water and Sewer Project Phase 2 is a continuation of the work that began in 2014 when a study was conducted by a local engineering firm, Masteller and Moler, Inc. (M&M). Construction of the commercial portion of the sewer project, known as Phase I, was completed in late 2019. Since that time, pursuant to BCC direction, staff conducted local town -hall type meetings with residents, met with interested parties, and solicited grant agencies to help offset the capital costs needed to construct the sewer infrastructure for Phase II. The North County Water and Sewer Project Phase 2 seeks to install centralized water and sewer to certain properties off Roseland Road between 128th Court and 135th Lane, portions of Ercildoune Heights and to properties along Ruffner Lane. For the water portion of the project (see Attachment 1), the County will be installing approximately 16,750 lineal feet (LF) of water main. Some existing parcels are already served by County water off Roseland Road, others have utilized complex connection agreements, while some properties have temporary service agreements that require them to participate in any future utility assessment project. In all, there are 161 properties that will be included in the water assessment project. Portions of the water main project not covered by grant funding would be funded by the benefitting properties through a special assessment. assessments, the BCC shall declare by resolution the nature and location of the proposed improvements, the part or portion of the cost thereof to be paid by special assessments, the manner in These are typically handled by Resolution I (Providing), Resolution II (Time and Place), Resolution III (Public Hearing/Confirming), and once the project is complete, Resolution IV (As Built). F:\Utilities\UTILITY - Engineering\Projects - Utility Construction Permits\IRC - North Sebastian S2S (M&M)\Agenda Items\Phase III Public 157 Hearing\Agenda North Sebastian S2S and Water Assessment Reso III 04.20.2021.docx 11 P a g e The public hearing is scheduled for Tuesday, April 20, 2021, at 9:05 am in the Indian River County Commission Chambers. A preliminary assessment roll and assessment plat have been prepared and are on file with the Clerk to the BCC and the Indian River County Department of Utility Services (IRCDUS). See Attachment 3 for the water assessment roll. Staff has done the following communications to notify property owners of the project: • Notification of Resolution I in the local newspaper publication on April 4, 2021, and advertisements for the public hearing were on April 6, 2021,and April 13, 2021 • March 10, 2021: Mailed letters to all properties within the project area • Emailed stakeholders who have provided their email addresses • Held a project meeting at the City of Sebastian City Hall on Monday, April 6, 2021, to go over the project, answer questions, and to remind residents of the public meeting The BCC, in its capacity to oversee the water assessment process, shall meet as the equalizing board to hear and consider any and all support for, or complaints against, proposed special assessments, and it shall adjust and equalize the special assessments on the basis of justice and right according to Chapter 206 (Special Assessments) of the Indian River County (Attachment 3 — Resolution III and Assessment Roll). For the sewer portion of Phase 2, the county will install approximately 15,400 -LF of gravity main, 54 manholes and a central lift station. There are 196 benefitting properties. Property owners will receive a benefit from the sewer installation but will not be assessed due to the grant funding. They will, however, be required to connect once the construction is complete and FDEP clearance is obtained. See Attachment 2 for a map of the area. The Certificate of Dedication within the plat of the River Trees Subdivision that includes Ruffner Lane (Plat Book 9, Page 24) states that all streets and easements are dedicated for the use of the property owners in the subdivision with the full knowledge that the same are not dedicated to the public until there is a formal acceptance of these streets, and/or easements, or any part thereof by the County. Therefore, as part of the subject item, a Resolution has been prepared for the County to formally accept an easement over, across, and underthe private road known as Ruffner Lane as well as the platted 10' wide easements that abut Ruffner Lane for the sole purpose of public utilities, but not to accept the street as a public street or for maintenance of the street. (Attachment 5 — Easement Resolution) Costs: The estimated construction cost is approximately $4,100,000.00, and the estimated project cost is approximately $5,900,000.00. The total project cost includes soft costs such as engineering design, construction inspection services, impact fee costs, and septic system abandonment. The table below identifies the project funding sources: Agency Amount FDEP: $ 3,250,000.00 IRLNEP: $ 204,017.69 SJRWMD: $1,280,818.77 Optional Sales Tax (OST): Sewer Impact fee offset (201 properties) $ 561,996.00 Benefitting Property Contributions Assessment Fees (Design/CEI Costs) $ 361,890.00 Water Impact Fee/Miscellaneous Fees ($1,505.39 for 161 properties) $ 242,367.79 Total Project Funding: $5,901,090.25 F:\Utilities\UTILITY - Engineering\Projects - Utility Construction Permits\IRC - North Sebastian S2S (M&M)\Agenda Items\Phase III Public 158 Hearing\Agenda North Sebastian S2S and Water Assessment Reso III 04.20.2021.docx 2 1 P a g e For the water portion of the assessment, costs are estimated as follows: Total Project Cost for Water: $ 2,005,536.62 Portions of Grant Funding for Water: $ (1,643,646.62) Remaining Funding Needed: $ 361,890.00 Benefitting Properties: 161 Assessment Cost per Property: $ 2,247.76 Note: There are other connection costs of waterimpact fee, 6ccountsetup, meter required ($1505.39) outside of assessment With the proposed project, the County would leverage the grant funding and utilize optional sales tax to incentivize property owners to connect to sewer and water. By doing so, the County and funding agencies will be assured that all sewer connections would be made, all septic systems would be abandoned, and all potable water connections would be done according to code. No sewer connections would be made unless property is also connected to water. This last part would allow IRDCUS to have proper billing for water in/sewer out, rather than having just a sewer only account, should a property owner elect not to hook up to county water. The installation of potable water would assist the Florida Department of Health's (FLDOH) area of concern with existing parcels that are not large enough to have the necessary setback requirements from septic system and well (domestic self -supply). The 2030 Indian River County Comprehensive Plan Potable Water Sub -Element Table 3.6.10 lists Ercildoune Heights as one such subdivision that has undersized lots while using private wells. This conversion to central water would be in accordance with 2030 Indian River County Comprehensive Plan Potable Water Sub -Element Object 2, which states that by 2030 at least 75% of all existing residential units in the County will be connected to a regional potable water system. Funding: Grant funds for the project are as follows: Description Agency I Amount Amount FY 2020/2021 Cost Share Grant SJRWMD $ 1,280,818.771 WQ restoration Grant and Amend. 1 FDEP $ 3,250,000.001 Indian River Lagoon Cost Share IRLNEP $ 204,017.693 Total $ 4,734,836.46 1: Only 33% of the sewer only project can be used, not water 2, 3: These grants to cover both water and sewer costs Optional Sales tax funds to be used for sewer impact fee offset/ incentive to connect: Account Name Account Number I Amount Optional Sales Tax/Sebastian Phase 2 Water & Sewer 1 31526836-006510-17513 1 $561,996.00 For the water portion of the assessment, revenues are as follows: Account Name Account Number Amount Sebastian Phase 2Water & Sewer ', 473-169000-17513 $361,890.00 Water Impact Fee 472034-343650 $209,300.00 Miscellaneous Income 471034-343670 $ 33,067.79 Funds for the water assessment project are derived from the Assessment Fund. Assessment Fund revenues are generated from fees paid by the benefitting property owners. F:\Utilities\UTILITY - Engineering\Projects - Utility Construction Permits\IRC - North Sebastian S2S (M&M)\Agenda Items\Phase III Public 159 Hearing\Agenda North Sebastian S2S and Water Assessment Reso III 04.20.2021.docx 3 1 P a g e Capital fund revenues are generated from impact fees. Furthermore, new growth has created the need for the expansion or construction of the facilities, and that new growth will benefit from the expansion or construction of the facilities. Recommendation: Open the public hearing and, after receiving input, consider adopting Resolution III with any revisions based on that public input. Accept an easement for utility purposes. Attachment(s): 1. Assessment Area Map Water 2. Assessment Area Map Sewer 3. Resolution III with Water Assessment Roll Exhibit A 4. DRAFT Temporary Construction Easement 5. Resolution to accept Utility Easement at Ruffner Lane F:\Utilities\UTILITY - Engineering\Projects - Utility Construction Permits\IRC - North Sebastian S2S (M&M)\Agenda Items\Phase III Public 160 Hearing\Agenda North Sebastian S2S and Water Assessment Reso III 04.20.2021.docx 4 1 P a g e 10 f 165 189 172 166 tai 130 164 d 173 170 31 1 162 ,• 175 178 / 154 132 78 ,W \ 177 170 181 5 \� 103 102 a2 183 1a 1eo 7 �x ,65 15 505 214 106 e6 x ' ,a0 139 u 'K 211 ,n 1a / i fi? u2 us 146 27 :.` 147 150 28 212 152 151` 149 120 / 128 127 207 �ff / J 201 97 13 107 Esri, HERE, Garmin, (c) OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS user community L NORTH COUNTY WATER/SEWER Legend 161 ft ?;PROJECT WATER ASSESSMENT PROJECT Parcels_W —S —Boundary_02_2021 Project®Water(13)C3Mter_Sewer(148) oete: 411212021 37 u 38 38 4 43 'tea u G 45 41 u 165 189 172 166 tai 130 164 d 173 170 31 1 162 ,• 175 178 / 154 132 78 ,W \ 177 170 181 5 \� 103 102 a2 183 1a 1eo 7 �x ,65 15 505 214 106 e6 x ' ,a0 139 u 'K 211 ,n 1a / i fi? u2 us 146 27 :.` 147 150 28 212 152 151` 149 120 / 128 127 207 �ff / J 201 97 13 107 Esri, HERE, Garmin, (c) OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS user community L NORTH COUNTY WATER/SEWER Legend 161 ft ?;PROJECT WATER ASSESSMENT PROJECT Parcels_W —S —Boundary_02_2021 Project®Water(13)C3Mter_Sewer(148) oete: 411212021 4.1 Ct. 505 —.A N Esri, 4RE,'Garmin, (c) �Op'hStreetMap contributors, and the GIS user Community NORTH COUNTY WATER I SEWER LP`alr:"e'ls -qNug- (6) ®Water Sewer (148) Sewer (48) 162 PROJECT PHASE 2 _W_S_:Boundary_02-2021 Project SEWER COLLECTION PROJECT Date: 4/1212021 Public Hearing (Third Reso.) RESOLUTION NO. 2021- A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, CONFIRMING THE SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS IN CONNECTION WITH A WATER MAIN EXTENSION TO SERVE 13700-13990 RUFFNER LANE WITHIN RIVER TREES; AND 14365 78TH AVENUE, 14355 AND 14370 80TH AVENUE WITHIN ERCILDOUNE HEIGHTS SUBDIVISION NO. 1; AND ALL PROPERTIES WITHIN ERCILDOUNE HEIGHTS SUBDIVISION NO. 2; AND ALL PROPERTIES LYING NORTHWEST OF BAY STREET (83RD AVENUE), ALL PROPERTIES WITHIN BLOCKS 1, 2, 3 AND 4; 8240 133RD COURT AND 8225, 8245 AND 8255133RD PLACE WITHIN BLOCK 14, 8230, 8240 AND 8250133RD PLACE, 8235, 8245 AND 8255 134TH STREET WITHIN BLOCK 15, 8240 134TH STREET, 13400 82"D COURT, AND 8235 AND 8255 135TH STREET WITHIN BLOCK 16, OF THE PLAT OF WAUREGAN ON FLEMING GRANT; AND ALL PROPERTIES WITHIN BLOCKS B-1 (LESS RIGHT-OF-WAY), B-2, B-3 AND B-4 (RIVER FRONT), ALL PROPERTIES WITHIN BLOCK B-2 (RAILROAD FRONT), ALL PROPERTIES WITHIN BLOCKS 1, 2 AND 3, AND 12805 AND 1283582 ND COURT WITHIN BLOCK 5, AND 12820 AND 12846 82"D COURT WITHIN BLOCK 6, AND 12920 AND 12940 82"D COURT WITHIN BLOCK 8, AND 12948 AND 12960 82"D COURT WITHIN BLOCK 9, AND 12970 AND 12980 82"D COURT WITHIN BLOCK 10, OF THE TOWNSITE PLAT OF ROSELAND, FLORIDA, LOCATED WITHIN UNINCORPORATED INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA; AND PROVIDING FOR SPECIAL ASSESSMENT LIENS TO BE MADE OF RECORD. WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County ("Board") has, by Resolution No. 2021-020 adopted on March 9, 2021, determined to make special assessments against certain properties to be specially benefited and serviced by a water main extension ("Assessment Project") benefiting 13700-13990 Ruffner Lane within River Trees; and 14365 78th Avenue, 14355 and 14370 801h Avenue within Ercildoune Heights Subdivision No. 1; and all properties within Ercildoune Heights Subdivision No. 2; and all properties lying northwest of Bay Street (831d Avenue), all properties within Blocks 1, 2, 3 and 4; 8240 133rd Court and 8225, 8245 and 8255 1331d Place within Block 14, 8230, 8240 and 8250 1331d Place, 8235, 8245 and 8255 134th Street within Block 15, 8240 134th Street, 13400 82nd Court, and 8235 and 8255135th Street within Block 16, of the Plat of Wauregan on Fleming Grant; and all properties within Blocks B-1 (less right-of-way), B-2, B-3 and B-4 (river front), all properties within Block B-2 (railroad front), all properties within Blocks 1, 2 and 3, and 12805 and 12835 82nd Court within Block 5, and 12820 and 12846 82nd Court within Block 6, and 12920 and 12940 82nd Court within Block 8, and 12948 and 12960 82nd Court within Block 9, and 12970 and 12980 82nd Court within Block 10, of the Townsite Plat of Roseland, Florida, located within unincorporated Indian River County, Florida, ("the Assessment Area"); and WHEREAS, Resolution No. 2021-020 described the method of assessing the cost of the Assessment Project against the specially benefited properties in the Assessment Area and how the special assessments imposed on the specially benefited properties in the Assessment Area are to be paid; and WHEREAS, Resolution No. 2021-020 was published in the Indian River Press Journal on April 4, 2021, as required by Section 206.04, Indian River County Code; and 163 RESOLUTION NO. 2021 - WHEREAS, Resolution No. 2021-021, adopted by the Board on March 9, 2021, set a time and place for a public hearing at which the owners of the specially benefited properties in the Assessment Area to be assessed for the Assessment Project and other interested persons would have the chance to be heard as to any and all complaints as to the Assessment Project and the special assessments imposed on the specially benefited properties in the Assessment Area, and for the Board to act as required by Section 206.07, Indian River County Code; and WHEREAS, notice of the time and place of the public hearing was published in the Indian River Press Journal on April 6, 2021 and on April 13, 2021 (at least twice, one week apart; the last being at least one week prior to the hearing), as required by Section 206.06, Indian River County Code; and WHEREAS, the land owners of record were mailed notices on March 12, 2021 (at least ten days prior to the hearing), as required by Section 206.06, Indian River County Code; and WHEREAS, the Board, on Tuesday, April 20, 2021, at 9:05 a.m. (or as soon thereafter as the public, hearing was heard) conducted the public hearing with regard to the special assessments; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, as follows: 1. The foregoing recitals are affirmed and ratified in their entirety. 2. The special assessments imposed for the Assessment Project against the specially benefited properties in the Assessment Area shown on the assessment roll attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and incorporated herein by this reference are hereby confirmed and approved, and shall remain legal, valid, and binding first liens upon and against the specially benefited properties shown on attached Exhibit "A until paid in full. The special assessments for the Assessment Project shall constitute a lien against the specially assessed property in the Assessment Area equal in rank and dignity with the liens of all state, county, district or municipal taxes, and other non -ad valorem assessments. Except as otherwise provided by law, such special assessment lien shall be superior in dignity to all other liens, titles and claims, until paid. The special assessment lien shall be deemed perfected upon adoption by the Board of this Resolution and recordation of this Resolution in the Official Records of the County maintained by the Clerk of Indian River County. Such recordation shall constitute prima facie evidence of the validity of the special assessments imposed for the Assessment Project in the Assessment Area. 3. The special assessment imposed per parcel is in the amount of $2,247.76,. and shall be due and payable and may be paid in full without interest within 90 days after the.date of the passage of the as -built resolution by the Board. The as -built resolution occurs after completion of the improvements. If not paid in full within the 90 -day period from the passage of the as -built resolution, then the special assessment may be paid in ten equal yearly installments of principal plus interest; said interest rate to be determined by the Board when the improvements are completed. 2 164 RESOLUTION NO. 2021- 4. The Board hereby finds and determines that the special assessments imposed in accordance with this Resolution and Resolution Nos. 2021-020 and 2021-021 provide an equitable method of funding the construction of the Assessment Project based upon the current uses, sizes, zoning and development potential of the parcels which are equally benefited by the provision of water, and thus the allocation of the assessment will be equal per parcel as described in Resolution No. 2021-020. The Board hereby finds and determines that the properties assessed by this Resolution will receive special benefits equal to or greater than the cost of the special assessment. The resolution was moved for adoption by Commissioner , and the motion was seconded by Commissioner and, upon being put to a vote, the vote was as follows: Chairman Joseph E. Flescher Vice Chairman Peter D. O'Bryan Commissioner. Susan Adams Commissioner Joseph H.. Earman Commissioner Laura Moss The Chairman thereupon declared the resolution duly passed and adopted this 20th day of April, 2021. Attest: Jeffrey R. Smith, Clerk of Court and Comptroller By Deputy Clerk Approved as to form and legal sufficiency: By Dylan Reingold, County Attorney BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA M Joseph E. Flescher, Chairman Attachment: Exhibit "A" - Assessment Roll (to be recorded on Public Records) 165 ..•.�, INDIAN RIVER COUNTY — DEPARTMENT OF UTILITY SERVICES NORTH COUNTY WATER / SEWER PROJECT S2S PHASE 2 — WATER ASSESSMENT PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL— RESOLUTION 3 Exhibit A Parcel# 30382100001000000001.0 Assessment= $2,247.76 Owner TREASURE COAST GETAWAYS INC Secondary Owner Map ID: 134 Mailing Address 8335135TH LN SEBASTIAN FL 31958 Legal PLAT OF WAUREGAN ON FLEMING GRANT PBB 1-75 LOT 1 Site Address 1357583RD AVE Revision Date: 4/8/2021 Parcel# 30382100001000000002.0 Assessment= $2,247.76 Owner TREASURE COAST GETAWAYS INC Secondary Owner Map ID: 205 Mailing Address 8335135TH LN SEBASTIAN FL 32958 Legal PLAT OF WAUREGAN ON FLEMING GRANT PBB 1-75 BEING MORE PART DESC AS FOLL LOT 2 LESS PARCEL AS IN OR BK 560 PP 2283 & LESS FOLL DESC PARC: BEG A T NE CO R OF SAID LOT 2; TH CONT NW ON NE BDRY OF LOT 2; 520 FTTO A PT BEING POB; TH CONT NW 125 FT; TH RUN SW 175 FT PERPENDICULAR TO NW BDRY TO A PT ON BDRY COMMON TO LOT 2 & 3; TH SE 125 FT; TH NE 175 FT TO TRUE POB. Site Address 8315 135TH LN Revision Date: 4/8/2021 Parcel# 30382100001000000002.1 Assessment= $2,247.76 Owner BISHOP, BEN AUSTIN and SUZANNE C Secondary Owner Map ID: 135 Mailing Address 8301135TH LN SEBASTIAN FL 32958 Legal PLAT OF WAUREGAN ON FLEMING GRANT PBB 1-75 BEING MORE PART DESC AS FOLL THAT PORT OF LOT 3 BEING MOREPART DESC AS FOLL; FOR A COMMENCEMENT BE GIN AT THE INT OF THE NLY R/W LINE OF BAY ST WITH THE NELY LINE OF THE FLEMING GRANT; TH RUN S 44 DEG 54 MIN 43 SEC W ALONG THE NLY R/W LINE OF AFORESAID BAY ST A DIST OF 165.97 FT TO THE NELY COR OF LOT 2; SAID PLAT OF WAUREGAN; TH RUN S 4 5 DEG 00 MIN 00 SEC W A DIST OF 95.0 FT, TO THE POB OF THIS DESC; TH RUN S 45 DEG 04 MIN 22 SEC W A DIST OF 80.00 FT TO A PT DIVIDING LOTS 2 & 3; SAID PLAT OF WAUREGAN; TH RUN NWLY ALONG THE LINE DIVIDING SAID LOTS 2 & 3 A DIST OF 500.0 FT TH RUN NELY A DIST OF 175.0 FT TO A PT ON THE LINE DIVIDING LOTS 1 & 2; SAID PLAT OF WAUREGAN; TH RUN SELY A DIST OF 370.0 FT TO THE NELY COR OF LANDS DESC IN OR SK 897 PG 45; TH RUN S 45 DEG 00 MIN 00 SEC W A DIST OF 9S.0 FT TH RUN SELY A DIST OF 130.0 FTTO THE POB. SUBJECT TO A 12.0 FT WIDE INGRESS/EGRESS & UTILITY EASEMENT OVER THE NLY 12.0 FT THEREOF. LESS THE FOLLOWING DESC PCL THE SE 350 FT OF THE NW 160.00 FT OF THE SE 645.00 FT OF LOT 2 WAUREGAN PLAT SEC 21 FLEMING GRANT TWP 30 S REG 38 E MORE PART DESC AS FOLLOWS; BEG AT THE NE COR OF SAID LOT 2; TH CONT NW OF THE NE B DY OF LOT 2; 520.00 FT TO A POB;TH RUN SW 175.00 FT PERPENDICULAR TO THE NW BDY TO A PT ON THE BDY COMMON TO SAID LOT 2 & 3 THE WAUREGAN PLAT;TH RUN SE 35.00 FT ON SAID BDY OF LOT 2 & LOT 3; TH RUN NE 175.00 FT TO SAID NE BDY OF LOT 2; TH R UN NW 35.00 FT ALONG SAID NE BDY OF LOT 2 TO THE POB" Site Address 8301 135TH LN Revision Date: 4/8/2021 Page 1 166 µ'r4 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY — DEPARTMENT OF UTILITY SERVICES + NORTH COUNTY WATER / SEWER PROJECT S2S PHASE 2 — WATER ASSESSMENT PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL — RESOLUTION 3 Exhibit A Parcel# 30382100001000000001.1 Assessment= $2,247.76 Owner TREASURE COAST GET AWAY INC Secondary Owner Map ID: 136 Mailing Address 8335135TH LN SEBASTIAN FL 32958 Legal PLAT OF WAUREGAN ON FLEMING GRANT PBB 1-75 BEING MORE PART DESC AS FOLL NW 125 FT OF SE 645 FT OF LOT2; MORE PART DESC AS FOLL, BEG AT NE COR OF SAID LOT 2; TH CONT NW ON NE BDRY OFLOT 2 DIST OF S20 FT TO A PT BEING THEPOB; TH CONT NW 125 FT; TH RUN SW 175 FT PERPENDICULAR TO NW BDRY TO A PT ON BDRY COMMON TO LOT 2 & LOT 3; TH SE 125 FT,•TH NE 175 FT TO TRUE POB; ALSO INC THE FOLLOWING DESC PCL THE SE 35.00 FT OF THE NW 160.00 FT OF THE SE 645.00 FT OF LOT 2 WAUREGAN PLAT SEC 21 FLEMING GRANT T WP 30 S RGE 38 E PBS 1-178 MORE PART DESCAS FOLLOWS; BEG AT THE NE COR OF SAIDLOT 2; TH CONT NW OF THE NE BOY OF LOT 2; 520.00 FT TO A POB; TH RUN SW 175.00 FT PERPENDICULAR TO THE NW BOY TO A PT ONTHE BOY COMMON TO SAID LOT 2 & LOT 3 TH E WAUREGAN PLAT, • TH RUN SE 35.00 FT ON SAID BOY OF LOT 2 & LOT 3; RUN NE 175.00FT TO SAID NE BOY OF LOT 2; TH RUN NW 35.00 FT ALONG SAID NE BOY OF LOT 2 TO THEPOB Site Address 8311 135TH LN Revision Date: 4/8/2021 Parcel# 30382100001000000002.3 Assessment= $2,247.76 Owner KEYES, PAMELA KAY (LE) Secondary Owner ZERNDT, TIMOTHY JAMES (TRS) Map ID: 137 Mailing Address 1006 RUISDAEL CIR NOKOMIS FL 34275 Legal PLAT OF WAUREGAN ON FLEMING GRANT PBB 1-75 BEING MORE PART DESC AS FOLL A PORT OF LOT 2 MORE PART DESCAS FOLL; COM AT INTERSECTION OF NLY R/W LINE OF BAY ST (A/K/A 83RD AVE) & FLEMING GRANT LINE & RUN S 44 DEG 54 MIN 43 SEC W ALONG SAID NLY R/W 165.97 FT TO POB; SAID PT ALSO BEING SELY COR OF LOT 2;TH S 45 DEG 00 MIN 00 SEC W 9S FT; TH N44 DEG 58 MIN 48 SEC W 130 FT; TH N 45 D EG 00 MIN 00 SEC E 95 FT TO ELY LINE OFSAID LOT 2; TH S 44 DEG 58 MIN 48 SEC EALONG SAID ELY LINE OF LOT 2 DIST OF 130 FT TO POB. Site Address 8300135TH LN Revision Date: 4/8/2021 Parcel# 30382100001000000003.0 Assessment= $2,247.76 Owner GREENAWAY, BRIAN Secondary Owner PARADOA, AMBERLY Map ID: 138 Mailing Address 1034 CLEARMONTST SEBASTIAN FL 32958 Legal FLEMING GRANT PLAT SHOWING THE SUBDIVISION OF THE PBB 1-72 BEING MORE PART DESC AS FOLL: THE E HALF OF LOT 3 BEING 100 FT IN WITH AND RUNNING FROM BAY STREET TO THE SEBASTIAN RIVER Site Address 13555 83RD AVE Revision Date: 4/8/2021 Page 2 167 .... , INDIAN RIVER COUNTY - DEPARTMENT OF UTILITY SERVICES NORTH COUNTY WATER / SEWER PROJECT S2S PHASE 2 - WATER ASSESSMENT PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL- RESOLUTION 3 Exhibit A Parcel# 30382100001000000003.1 Assessment= $2,247.76 Owner STEWART, BONNIE Secondary Owner Map ID: 6 Mailing Address 8120SSEACRESTDR VERO BEACH FL 32963 Legal PLAT OF WAUREGAN ON FLEMING GRANT PBB 1-75 BEING MORE PART DESCAS FOLL W2/ 2 OF LOT 3 & LOT 4, LESS PARC CONVEYED TO FRANK J ZORC 1R IN D BK 56 PP 69; AND SUBJECT TO DRAINAGE/MAINTENANCE EASEMENT REC OR BK 1711/837. Site Address 1354583RD AVE Revision Date: 4/8/2021 Parcel# 30382100001000000004.0 Assessment= $2,247.76 Owner ROGALA, FRANK J (COTR) and ROSE A (COTR) Secondary Owner Map ID: 133 Mailing Address PO BOX 866 ROSELAND FL 32957 Legal PLAT OF WAUREGAN ON FLEMING GRANT PBB 1-75 BEING MORE PART DESC AS FOLL PART OF LOT 4 DESC AS COM AT ACOR IN THE NLY LINE OF BAY ST WHICH IS COMMON TO LOTS 4 & S;RUN N 46 DEG 06 MINE; ALONG BAY ST; DIST OF 25 FT TO A PT.TH RUN N 43 DEG 54 MIN W DIST OF 309.35 FT TO A PT; BEING THE POB. TH RUN N 43 DEG 54 MIN W A DIST OF 343.51 FT TO A PT.TH RUN N 46 DEG 11 MIN E A DIST OF 87.6 5 FT TO A PT; TH RUN S 43 DEG 52 MIN 20SEC E A DIST OF 109.68 FT TO A PT; TH RUN S 82 DEG 38 MIN 42 SEC E A DIST OF 87.88 FT TO A PT; TH RUN S 44 DEG 06 MIN 04SEC E A DIST OF 166.23 FT TO A PT; TH RUN S 46 DEG 32 MIN 10 SEC W A DIST OF 14 3.19 FT TO THE POB. Site Address 13537 83RD AV Revision Date: 4/8/2021 Parcel# 30382100001000000004.1 Assessment= $2,247.76 Owner ROGALA, FRANK J (COTR) and ROSE A (COTR) Secondary Owner Map ID: 1 Mailing Address PO BOX 866 ROSELAND FL 32957 Legal PLAT OF WAUREGAN ON FLEMING GRANT PBB 1-75 BEING MORE PART DESC AS FOLL FROM AN IRON PIPE LOCATED ON SE COR OF LOT 1; WAUREGAN SUB & FLEMING G RANT LINE; RUN S 46 DEG 06 MIN W ALONG NR/W LINE OF BAY ST 601.0 FT TO A PIPE ON POB; TH CONT S 46 DEG 06 MIN W ALONG R /W 140 FT; TH N 43 DEG 54 MIN W PARALLELTO W LINE OF LOT 4 DIST OF 309.35 FT; TH N 46 DEG 06 MIN E 141.62 FT; TH S 43 D EG 36 MIN E 309.36 FT TO POB. Site Address 13535 83RD AV Revision Date: 4/8/2021 Page 3 168 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY- DEPARTMENT OF UTILITY SERVICESNORTH COUNTY WATER / SEWER PROJECT S2S PHASE 2 - WATER ASSESSMENT (.0a PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL- RESOLUTION 3 Exhibit A Parcel If 30382100001000000004.2 Assessment= $2,247.76 Owner ROGALA, GEORGE and LINDA Secondary Owner Map ID., 185 Mailing Address PO BOX 866 ROSELAND FL 32957 Legal PLAT OF WAUREGAN ON FLEMING GRANT PBB 1-75 BEING MORE PART DESC AS FOLL BEG ATA COR IN THE NLY LINE OF BAYST WHICH IS COMMON TO LOTS 4 & 5; N 43 DEG 54 MIN W,• ALONG THE LINE BETWEEN LOTS 4 & 5; A DIST OF 1007.5 FT; M/LTO THE SHORE OF SEB RIVER, THEN MEANDER THE SHORE OF THE SEB RIVER; NELYA DISTOF 114.56 FT TO A PT. • THEN RUN S 43 DEG52 MIN 20 SEC OF 374.58 FT TO A PT, • THEN RUN S 46 DEG 11 MIN 30 SEC INA DIST OF87.65 FT TO A PT; S 43 DEG 54 MIN E A DIST OF 652.86 FT TO A PT IN THE NLY LINE OF BAYST,• THEN RUN S 46 DEG 06 MIN W ADIST OF 25.00 FT TO THE POB. Site Address 1353983RD AV Revision Date: 4/8/2021 Parcel# 30382100001000000005.0 Assessment= $2,247.76 Owner ROGALA, FRANK J (COTR) and ROSE A (COTR) Secondary Owner Map ID: 186 Mailing Address PO BOX 905 ROSELAND FL 32957 Legal PLAT OF WAUREGAN ON FLEMING GRANT PBB 1-75 BEING MORE PART DESC AS FOLL BEG AT COR IN THE NLY LINE OFBAY ST WHICH IS COMMON TO LOTS 4 & S; RU N N 43 DEG 54 MIN W ALONG THE LINE BETWEEN LOTS 4 & 5; A DIST OF 1007.5 FT; M/LTO THE SHORE OF SEB RIVER; TH MEANDER T HE SHORE OF THE SEB RIVER, SWLY A DIST OF 152.30 FT TO A PT LYING 150 FT S OF AND NORMAL TO THE COMMON LINE BETWEEN LOTS 4 & 5; TH RUN S 43 DEG 54 MIN E A DIST OF 328.06 FT M/L TO A PT; TH RUN N 46 DEG06 MIN E A DIST OF 60 FT TO A PT; TH RU N S 88 DEG 51 MIN 59 SEC E A DIST OF 91.99 FT TO A PT; TH RUN 5 43 DEG 54 MIN EA DIST OF 588.04 FT TO A PT IN THE N LIN E OF BAY ST; TH RUN N 46 DEG 06 MIN E ADIST OF 25.00 FT TO THE POB." Site Address 13529 83RD AV Revision Date: 4/8/2021 Parcel# 30382100001000000005.1 Assessment= $2,247.76 Owner ROGALA, FRANK J (COTR) & ROSE A (COTR) Secondary Owner Map ID: 187 Mailing Address PO BOX 905 ROSELAND FL 32957 Legal PLAT OF WAUREGAN ON FLEMING GRANT PBB 1-75 BEING MORE PART DESC AS FOLL COMM AT A NLY LINE OF BAY ST WHICH IS A COMMON CORNER TO LOTS 4 & 5; A ND RUN S 46 DEG 06 MIN W ALONG THE NLY LINE OF BAY ST A DIST OF 25 FT TO A PT; TH RUN N 43 DEG 54 MIN W A DIST OF 348.04 FT TO THE POB. TH RUN S 46 DEG 08 MIN WA DIST OF 125 FT TO A PT; TH RUN N 43 DEG 54 MIN W A DIST OF 305.01 FT TO A PT; TH RUN S 88 DEG 51 MIN 59 SEC E A DISTOF 91.99 FT TO A PT; TH RUN S 43 DEG 54MIN E A DIST OF 240.00 FT TO THE POB. Site Address 13515 83RD AV Revision Date: 4/8/2021 Page 4 169 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY- DEPARTMENT OF UTILITY SERVICES NORTH COUNTY WATER / SEWER PROJECT S2S PHASE 2 - WATER ASSESSMENT �� J PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL - RESOLUTION 3 Exhibit A Parcel# 30382100001000000005.2 Assessment= $2,247.76 Owner BULLARD, JAMES R M & EMILY G Secondary Owner Map ID: 188 Mailing Address 13455 BAY ST SEBASTIAN FL 32958 Legal PLAT OF WAUREGAN ON FLEMING GRANT PBB 1-75 BEING MORE PART DESCAS FOLL 80 FT OFF SWLY SIDE OF LOT 5; D BK 26 PP 577 Site Address 1345583RD AV Revision Date: 4/8/2021 Parcel# 30382100001000000005.3 Assessment= $2,247.76 Owner Confidential Secondary Owner Map ID: 189 Mailing Address Legal PLAT OF WAUREGAN ON FLEMING GRANT PBB 1-75 BEING MORE PART DESC AS FOLL COM MENCEATACOR INTHE NLYLINE OF BAYSTWHICH ISACOMMON CORNERTO LOTS 4 & 5; AND RUN S46 DEG 06 MIN WALONG THE NLY LINE OF BAY STA DIST OF 25.0 O FT TO THE POB. TH RUN N 43 D Site Address Revision Date: 4/8/2021 Parcel# 30382100001000000006.0 Assessment= $2,247.76 Owner FITTS, JERE J (LE) Secondary Owner Map ID: 190 Mailing Address 13445 83RD AVE SEBASTIAN FL 33958 Legal PLAT OF WAUREGAN ON FLEMING GRANT PBB 1-75 BEING MORE PART DESC AS FOLL: LO T6ASINDBK26PP81&DBK38PP538LESS SWLY75FT Site Address 13445 83RD AV Revision Date: 4/8/2021 x. ,»! .`. Le! ... ... °�_.. , . -3', r... _, .k„.',.a...a,...'hC.K`m..'' $..✓ »3., .;�'a..�a .,. ".'� aPxrw � D was to -,a. ..3Wn..sy;fa:t _401F, Page 5 170 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY — DEPARTMENT OF UTILITY SERVICES- - -'`� ""R�' NORTH COUNTY WATER / SEWER PROJECT S2S PHASE 2 — WATER ASSESSMENT � PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL— RESOLUTION 3 Exhibit A ' Parcel # 30382100001000000006.1 Assessment= $2,247.76 Owner STEINKE, CARL E & KAREN K Secondary Owner Map ID: 191 Mailing Address 13425 BAY ST SEBASTIAN FL 32958 Legal PLAT OF WAUREGAN ON FLEMING GRANT PBB 1-178 & 179 ALL OF LOT 6 LYING N OF BAY ST, EXCEPT THAT PART NOF LOT 6 LYING WITHIN 75 FT OF THE BDRY LINE BETW EEN LOTS 6 AND 7" Site Address 1342583RDAV Revision Date: 4/8/2021 Parcel# 30382100001000000006.2 Assessment= $2,247.76 Owner BROWN, R D (TR) & JUANITA (TR) Secondary Owner Map ID: 192 Mailing Address PO BOX 27 ROSELAND FL 32957 Legal PLAT OF WAUREGAN ON FLEMING GRANT PBB 1-75 BEING MORE PART DESC AS FOLL THAT PART OF LOT 6 DESC AS FOLL; BEG AT PT WHERE THE SWLY LOT LINE OF LOT 6 (LINE DIVIDING LOT 6 & 7) INTERSEECTS WITH THE SEBASTIAN RIVER; TH RUN INA SELY DIRECTION 525.00 FT; MORE OR LES S TO THE R/W OF BAY ST WHICH IS THE SWLY COR OF LOT 6; TH RUN IN A NELY DIRECTION ALONG THE R/W OF BAY ST WHICH IS THE SELY LOT LINE OF LOT 6 DIST OF 75.0 FT TO A CONCRETE MONUMENT; TH RUN IN A NWLYDIRECTION PARALLELTO THE SWLY LOT LINE OF SAID LOT 6 DIST OF 658.91 FT; MORE ORE LESS TO THE SHORELINE OF THE SEBASTIANRIVER; TH RUN IN A SLY & SWLY DIRECTION MEANDERING THE SHORE OF THE SEBASTIAN RIVER TO THE POB; LESS & EXCEPTTHE FOLLPOR OF LOT 6; BEG AT THE SWLY COR OF LOT 6; WHICH IS THE INTERSECTION OF THE SWLY LINE OF LOT 6 & THE NWLY R/W LINE OF BAY ST; TH RUN IN A NELY DIRECTION ALONG THE R/W OF BAY ST & ALONG THE SELY LOT LINE OF SAID 6 DIST OF 75.0 FT TO A CONCRETE MONUMENT; TH RUN NWLY PARALLEL TO TH E SWLY LOT LINE OF SAID LOT 6 DIST OF 200.0 FT; TH RUN SWLY PARALLEL TO THE SELYLOT LINE OF LOT 6 DIST OF 75.0 FT; TH R UN SELY ALONG THE SWLY LOT LINE OF LOT 6DIST OF 200.0 FT TO POB & TOG WITH THATPORT OF LOT 7 FACING BAY ST & RUNNING T 0 THE SEBSATIAN RIVER AS SHOWN ON PLAT OF WAUREGAN PBS 1-178 DESC AS FOLL, BEG AT THE SE COR OF SAID LOT 7; BEING THAT E LY COR OF SAID LOT 7 THAT ADJOINS BAY ST; TH RUN IN A SWLY DIRECTION ALONG BAY ST FOR A DIST OF 100.0 FT TO A PT ON THE SLY LINE OF SAID LOT 7; TH RUN IN A NWLYDIRECTION ALONG A LINE PARALLEL WITH THEELY LINE OF LOT 7 TO THE SEBASTIAN RIVE R; TH RUN IN A NLY DIRECTION ALONG THE SEBASTIAN RIVER TO THE NELY COR OF SAID LOT 7; TH RUN IN A SELY DIRECTION ALONG S AID ELY LINE OF SAID LOT 7 TO THE SELY COR OF SAID LOT 7; BEING POB OF THIS LANDHEREIN DESC IN OR BK 1222 PP 2014 (D BK 26 PP 81 & D BK 38 PP S38). Site Address 13405 83RD AV Revision Date: 4/8/2021 Parcel# 30382100001000000007.1 Assessment= $2,247.76 Owner KANDEL, PHILLIP H Secondary Owner MOYERS, DONNA Map ID: 193 Mailing Address 13345 83RD AVE SEBASTIAN FL 32958 Legal PLAT OF WAUREGAN ON FLEMING GRANT PBB 1-75 BEING MORE PART DESC AS FOLL SWL Y 90 FT OF LOT 7 & NELY 30 FT OF LOT 8 AS DESC IN BK 256 PP 215. Site Address 13345 83RD AV Revision Date: 4/8/2021 Page 6 171 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY — DEPARTMENT OF UTILITY SERVICES NORTH COUNTY WATER / SEWER PROJECT S2S PHASE 2 — WATER ASSESSMENT PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL — RESOLUTION 3 Exhibit A Parcel If 30382100001000000008.0 Assessment= $2,247.76 Owner VOLK, KARL F and SUSAN F Secondary Owner Map ID: 194 Mailing Address 1333383RD AVE SEBASTIAN FL 32958 Legal PLAT OF WAUREGAN ON FLEMING GRANT PBB 1-75 BEING MORE PART DESC AS FOLL LOTS LESS FOLL DESC PARC, • COM AT SW COR OF LOT 8; TH S 89 DEG 12 MIN 51 SEC E ALONG N R/W LINE OF BAY ST 87.74 FT TO POB; TH N 00 DEG 47 MIN 10 SECE 110 FT; TH N 89 DEG 12 MIN 23 SEC W 18.50 FT,• TH N 00 DEG 47 MIN 08 SEC E 103.62 FT,• TH S 89 DEG 13 MIN 42 SEC E 17.69FT,• TH N 00 DEG 47 MIN 20 SEC E 109.09 FT TO A PT ON THE SAFE UPLAND LINE OF THE SEBASTIAN RIVER; TH ALONG SAFE UPLANDLINE N 45 DEG 06 MIN 49 SEC E 16.74 FT; TH N 54 DEG 15 MIN 47 SEC E 86.06 FT TOINTERSECTION WITH E LINE OF PARC OF LANDAS DESC HEREIN; TH ALONG E PROP LINE S 00 DEG 41 MIN 19 SEC W 39.65 FT, • TH CONTALONG E PROP LINE 363.41 FT TO A PT ONN R/W LINE OF BAY ST (80 FT R/W); TH ALO NG SAID R/W LINE N 89 DEG 11 MIN 51 SECW 87.74 FT TO POB & ALSO LESS NELY30 FT. Site Address 1333383RD AV Revision Date: 4/8/2021 Parcel# 30382100001000000008.1 Assessment= $2,247.76 Owner DOODY, LORRAINE S Secondary Owner Map ID: 195 Mailing Address 3855 NE 23RD AVE POMPANO BEACH FL33064 Legal PLAT OF WAUREGAN ON FLEMING GRANT PBB 1-75 BEING MORE PART DESC AS FOLL A PART OF LOT 8 DESC AS FOLL; COM AT SW COR OF LOT 8; S 89 DEG 12 MIN 51 SEC E ALONG N R/W LINE OF BAY ST 87.74 FT TO POB; TH N 00 DEG 47 MIN 20 SEC E120 FT, TH N 89 DEG 12 MIN 23 SEC W 18. 50 FT; TH N 00 DEG 47 MIN 08 SEC E 103.62 FT; TH S 89 DEG 13 MIN 42 SEC E 17.69 FT; TH N 00 DEG 47 MIN 20 SEC E 109.09 FT TO A PT ON THE SAFE UPLAND LINE OF SEB RIV; TH ALONG SAFE UPLAND LINE N 45 DEG 06 MIN 49 SEC E 26.74 FT; TH N 54 DEG 15 MIN 47 SEC E 86.06 FT TO INTERSECTION WITH E LINE OF PCL OF LAND AS DESC HEREIN: TH ALONG E PROP LINE S 00 DEG 41 MIN 19 SEC W 39.65 FT; TH CONT ALONG E PROP LINE 363.41 FT TO A PT ON N R/W LINE OF BAY ST (80 FT R/W); TH ALONG SAID R/W LINE N 89 DEG 12 MIN 51 SEC W 87.74 FT TO POB. Site Address 13335 83RD AV Revision Date: 4/8/2021 Parcel# 30382100001001000001.0 Assessment= $2,247.76 Owner TOUGH, NANCY B Secondary Owner RUESGA, KATHLEEN G RUESGA, SERGIO E Map ID: 196 Mailing Address 13465 83RD AVE SEBASTIAN FL 32958 legal PLAT OF WAUREGAN ON FLEMING GRANT PBB 1-75 BEING MORE PART DESC AS FOLL BLK 1 LOTS 1,2 & E1/2 OF LOT 3 Site Address 13450 83RD AV Revision Date: 4/8/2021 172 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY - DEPARTMENT OF UTILITY SERVICES NORTH COUNTY WATER / SEWER PROJECT S2S PHASE 2 - WATER ASSESSMENT PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL - RESOLUTION 3 Exhibit Parcel# 30382100001001000003.0 Assessment= $2,247.76 Owner REYNOLDS, TONY Secondary Owner REYNOLDS, ROBIN Map ID: 197 Mailing Address 13430BAYST SEBASTIAN FL 32958 Legal PLAT OF WAUREGAN ON FLEMING GRANT PBB 1-75 BEING MORE PART DESC AS FOLL W 1 12 OF LOT 3, LOT & E112OFLOT 5 BLK1 Site Address 1343083RDAV Revision Date: 4/8/2021 Parcel# 30382100001001000005.0 Assessment= $2,247.76 Owner WOOD, ANTHONY TODD & AMY MARIE Secondary Owner Ma ID: 198 Mailing Address 13085 83RD AVE SEBASTIAN FL 32958 Legal PLAT OF WAUREGAN ON FLEMING GRANT PBB 1-75 BEING MORE PART DESC AS FOLL BLK 1 W 1/2 LOT 5 & ALL LOT 6 Site Address 8290 134TH ST Revision Date: 4/8/2021 Parcel # 30382100001001000007.0 Assessment= $2,247.76 Owner BOYER, DEBORAH L Secondary Owner Map ID: 199 Mailing Address 1666 WHITMORE ST SEBASTIAN FL 32958 ! Legal PLAT OF WAUREGAN ON FLEMING GRANT PBB 1-75 BEING MORE PART DESC AS FOLL BLK 1 LOT 7 & N 1/2 LOT 8 1 f Site Address 8280134TH ST Revision Date: 4/8/2021 Page 8 173 W`Rn INDIAN RIVER COUNTY — DEPARTMENT OF UTILITY SERVICES NORTH COUNTY WATER / SEWER PROJECT S2S PHASE 2 — WATER ASSESSMENT PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL — RESOLUTION 3 Exhibit A ^ Parcel# 30382100001001000008.0 Assessment= $2,247.76 Owner FLEMING, SCOTT Secondary Owner Map ID. 11 Mailing Address 71 MARIOMI RD NEW CANAAN CT 06840 Legal PLAT OF WAUREGAN ON FLEMING GRANT PBS 1-75 BEING MORE PART DESCAS FOLL BLK 151/2 LOT 8 & ALL LOT9 Site Address 134TH ST Revision Date: 4/8/2021 Parcel# 30382100001001000010.0 Assessment= $2,247.76 Owner SCOCOZZO, KENNETH Secondary Owner Map ID: 108 Mailing Address PO BOX 63 ROSELAND FL 32957 Legal PLAT OF WAUREGAN ON FLEMING GRANT PBB 1-75 BEING MORE PART DESC AS FOLL BLK 1 LOTS 10, 11 & 12" Site Address 8265135TH ST Revision Date: 4/8/2021 Parcel# 30382100001002000001.0 Assessment= $2,247.76 Owner PETERSEN, PAUL Secondary Owner Map ID: 109 Mailing Address 13350 BAY ST SEBASTIAN FL 32958 Legal PLAT OF WAUREGAN ON FLEMING GRANT PBB 1-75 BEING MORE PART DESC AS FOLL BLK 2 LOTS 1, 2 & 3, LESS SELY 50 FT Site Address 13350 83RD AV Revision Date: 4/8/2021 Page 9 174 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY- DEPARTMENT OF UTILITY SERVICES NORTH COUNTY WATER / SEWER PROJECT S2S PHASE 2 - WATER ASSESSMENT PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL - RESOLUTION 3 Exhibit A Parcel# 30382100001002000001.1 Assessment= $2,247.76 Owner MEYER, JOEL L Secondary Owner BLONDER, LEONARD (2/7) FRANK, STEFAN (1/7) GROSSBART, JACK (1/7) 1 GROSSBART, NANCY (1/7) PALEY, MICHELE (LEONARD'S) Map ID: 2 Mailing Address 9500SHIGHWAYAIA MELBOURNE BEACH FL 32951 Legal PLAT OF WAUREGAN ON FLEMING GRANT PBB 1-75 BEING MORE PART DESCAS FOLL BLK 2 SELY 50 FT OF LOTS 1,2 &3" Site Address 134TH ST Revision Date: 4/8/2021 Parcel# 30382100001002000004.0 Assessment= $2,247.76 Owner FREEMAN, JESSE E & KATHLEEN B Secondary Owner Map ID: 167 Mailing Address 1333083RD AVE SEBASTIAN FL 32958 Legal PLAT OF WAUREGAN ON FLEMING GRANT PB81-75 BEING MORE PART DESC AS FOLL BLK 2 LOT 4 & ELY 1/2 LOT 5 Site Address 13330 83RD AVE Revision Date: 4/8/2021 Parcel# 30382100001002000005.0 Assessment= $2,247.76 Owner DEHMER, BARBARA Secondary Owner Map ID: 168 Mailing Address PO BOX 268 ROSELAND FL 32957 Legal PLAT OF WAUREGAN ON FLEMING GRANT PBB 1-75 BEING MORE PART DESC AS POLL BLK 2 W LY 1/2 LOT 5 & ALL LOT 6 Site Address 13328 83RD AV Revision Date: 4/8/2021 Page 10 175 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY- DEPARTMENT OF UTILITY SERVICES - NORTH COUNTY WATER / SEWER PROJECT S2S PHASE 2 - WATER ASSESSMENT PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL - RESOLUTION 3 ExhibitA' Parcel# 30382100001002000007.0 Assessment= $2,247.76 Owner BURNS, MARY COOKE (TR) Secondary Owner Mop ID: 169 Mailing Address 531BELMONTAVE BOWLING GREEN KY42101 Legal PLAT OF WAUREGAN ON FLEMING GRANT PBB 1-75 BEING MORE PART DESC AS FOLL LOT 7& PART OF LOT 8 A D SK 64, PP 485 BLK 2 Site Address 8181133RD PL Revision Date: 4/8/2021 Parcel # 30382100001002000008.0 Assessment= $2,247.76 Owner FREEMAN, PATRICK H Secondary Owner Map ID: 170 Mailing Address 8260133RD PL SEBASTIAN FL 32958 Legal PLAT OF WAUREGAN ON FLEMING GRANT PBB 1.75 BEING MORE PART DESC AS FOLL: BLK 2 LOT 9 AND A POR OF LOT 8 BEING MORE PART DESC AS FOLL: COM AT A POINT ON THE SLY LOT LINE OF SAID LOT 8 WHERE SAID LINE INTERSECTS MANATEE AVE, SAID POINT BEING THE POB; RUN NELY ALONG THE SAID SLY LOT LINE OF LOT 8 LOT 8; TH NELY ALONG SAID REAR LINE FOR A TO THE REAR LOT LINE OF DIST OF 25 FT TO A POINT; TH RUN SWLY ON A LINE PARA TO THE SLY LOT LINE TO A POINT, TH SELY ALONG THE FRONT LOT LINE OF SAID LOT 8 FOR A DIST OF 25 FT TO THE POB." Site Address 8260133RD PL Revision Date: 4/8/2021 Parcel# 30382100001002000010.0 Assessment= $2,247.76 Owner MEYER, JOEL L Secondary Owner Map ID: 171 Mailing Address 9500 S HIGHWAY AlA MELBOURNE BEACH FL 32951 Legal PLAT OF WAUREGAN ON FLEMING GRANT PBB 1-75 BEING MORE PART DESC AS FOLL BLK 2 LOT 10 & N 1/2 LOT 11 Site Address 8275 134TH ST Revision Date: 4/8/2021 Page 11 176 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY - DEPARTMENT OF UTILITY SERVICES NORTH COUNTY WATER / SEWER PROJECT S2S PHASE 2 - WATER ASSESSMENT PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL- RESOLUTION 3 Exhibit A Parcel# 30382100001002000011.0 Assessment= $2,247.76 Owner BARBER, AUBREY Secondary Owner Map ID: 172 Mailing Address PO BOX 453 ROSELAND FL 32957 Legal PLAT OF WAUREGAN ON FLEMING GRANT PBB 1-75 BEING MORE PART DESCAS FOLL: BL K 2 51/2 LOT 11 & ALL LOT 12 Site Address 8265134TH ST Revision Date: 4/8/2021 Parcel# 30382100001003000001.0 Assessment= $2,247.76 Owner WHITAKER, JAMES R & REBECCA C Secondary Owner Map ID: 173 Mailing Address 8295 133RD PL SEBASTIAN FL 32958 Legal PLAT OF WAUREGAN ON FLEMING GRANT PBB 1-75 BEING MORE PART DESC AS FOLL BLK 3LOT 1&ELY 12LOT 2 Site Address 8295133RD PL Revision Date: 4/8/2021 Parcel# 30382100001003000002.0 I Assessment= $2,247.76 Owner HOLDSWORTH, MURIEL (LE) I Secondary Owner HOLDSWORTH, ALAN HOLDSWORTH, JIM HOLDSWORTH, JOHN HOLDSWORTH, MURIEL MIKOLAICIK, LINDA Map ID: 174 Mailing Address 13326 BAY ST SEBASTIAN FL 32958 Legal PLAT OF WAUREGAN ON FLEMING GRANT PBB 1-75 BEING MORE PART DESC AS FOLL BLK 3 W LY 1/2 LOT 2 & ALL LOT 3 Site Address 13326 83RD AV Revision Date: 4/8/2021 r . Page 12 177 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY- DEPARTMENT OF UTILITY SERVICES NORTH COUNTY WATER / SEWER PROJECT S2S PHASE 2 - WATER ASSESSMENT PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL- RESOLUTION 3 Exhibit A Parcel # 30381100001003000004.0 Assessment= $2,247.76 Owner SABOL, BRUCE and MARGARET A Secondary Owner Map ID: 175 Mailing Address PO BOX 1060 ROSELAND FL 32957 Legal PLAT OF WAUREGAN ON FLEMING GRANT PBB 1-75 BEING MORE PART DESCAS FOLL BLK 3 LOT 4 & ELY 1/2 LOTS Site Address 1332083RDAV Revision Date: 4/8/2021 Parcel# 30382100001003000005.0 Assessment= $2,247.76 Owner MEEKIN, STEVE & FRANCES Secondary Owner LARSON, DANIEL & SUSAN Map ID: 176 Mailing Address 141 GREGORY MANOR YOUNGSVILLE NC 27596 Legal PLAT OF WAUREGAN ON FLEMING GRANT PBB 1-75 BEING MORE PART DESC AS FOLL BLK 3 WLY 1/2 LOT 5 & ALL LOT 6 Site Address 13310 83RD AV Revision Date: 4/8/2021 Parcel $1 30382100001003000007.0 Assessment= $2,247.76 Owner ROTH, ARTHUR F and CHERYL Secondary Owner Map ID: 177 Mailing Address W6055 PIERS GORGE RD NORWAY MI 49870 Legal PLAT OF WAUREGAN ON FLEMING GRANT PBB 1-75 BEING MORE PART DESC AS FOLL BLK 3 LOT 7 AS D BK 16, PP 130" Site Address 8282133RD CT Revision Date: 4/8/2021 Page 13 178 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY - DEPARTMENT OF UTILITY SERVICES NORTH COUNTY WATER / SEWER PROJECT S2S PHASE 2 - WATER ASSESSMENT PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL - RESOLUTION 3 .f rR Exhibit A Parcel# 30382100001003000010.0 Assessment= $2,247.76 Owner HECKENSTALLER, RICHARD IR & CAROLYN Secondary Owner Map ID: 178 Mailing Address 8285133RD PL SEBASTIAN FL 32958 Legal PLAT OF WAUREGAN ON FLEMING GRANT PBB 1-75 BEING MORE PART DESC AS FOLL BLK 3LOTS 10&11 Site Address 8285133RD PL Revision Date: 4/8/2021 Parcel# 30382100001003000012.0 Assessment= $2,247.76 Owner SHANNON, STEVE A and KELLY L Secondary Owner - Map ID: 179 Mailing Address PO BOX 1193 ROSELAND FL 32957 Legal PLAT OF WAUREGAN ON FLEMING GRANT PBB 1-75 BEING MORE PART DESC AS FOLL BLK 3 LOTS 8,9 & 12" Site Address 8271133RD PL Revision Date: 4/8/2021 Parcel# 30382100001004000001.0 Assessment= $2,247.76 Owner LECLAIR, MARIA Secondary Owner CAPPS, MICHEAL ANTHONY Map ID: 180 Mailing Address 8275 133RD CT SEBASTIAN FL 32958 Legal PLAT OF WAUREGAN ON FLEMING GRANT PBB 1-75 BEING MORE PART DESC AS FOLL BEG AT A POINT FORMED BY THE SLY ROW OF BAY ST WITH THE ELY ROW OF F.E.C. RR TH RUN NELY ALONG THE SLY ROW OF BAY ST A DIST OF 69.3 FT TO THE INTERSECTION OF THE SLY ROW OF SAY ST WITH TH WLY ROW OF CENTRE ST TH RUN SELY ALONG SAID WLY ROW OF CENTRE ST A DIST OF 598.8 FT TO THE POINT WHERE THE WLY ROW OF CENTRE ST INTERSECTS THE ELY ROW OF THE F.E.C. RR TH RUN NWLY ALONG SAID ELY ROW OF THE F.E.C. RR A DIST OF 602.79 TO POB Site Address 8275133RD CT Revision Date: 4/8/2021 Page 14 179 p•'rwr. INDIAN RIVER COUNTY - DEPARTMENT OF UTILITY SERVICES NORTH COUNTY WATER / SEWER PROJECT S2S PHASE 2 - WATER ASSESSMENT �f PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL - RESOLUTION 3 Exhibit A Parcel If 30382100001014000001.0 Assessment= $2,247.76 Owner HALLA, SHARON Secondary Owner MORALES, MARTIN Map ID., 181 Mailing Address 8255133RD PL SEBASTIAN FL 32958 Legal PLAT OF WAUREGAN ON FLEMING GRANT PBB 1-178 BEING MORE PART DESC AS FOLL ALL OF BLK 14 LOT 1 AND THAT PORTION OF LOT 2 BLK 14 WAUREGAN DESCAS FOLL BEG AT THE NEL YCDR OF LOT 2 BLK 14 BEING THE NORTHERNMOST COR OF LOT 2 FACING MANATEE AVE TH RUN IN A SWLY DIR AL THE N SIDE OF LOT 2 FOR A DIST OF 150 FT TO THE REAR NWLY COR OF LOT 2 TH RUN IN A SELY DIRECTION AL THE REAR LOT LINE OF LOT 1 FOR A DIST OF 25 FT TO A POINT TH RUN IN A NELY DIRECTION ON A STRAIGHT UNE THAT IS PARA TO THE NLY SIDE LOT LINE OF SAID LOT 2 FOR A DIST OF 150 FT TO A POINT ON THE FRONT LOT LINE OF SAID LOT 2 THAT IS 25 FT FROM THE NELY COR OF SAID LOT 2 TH RUN NWLY DIRECTION AL THE SAID FRONT LOT LINE OF LOT 2 TO THE POB (BEING THE NLY 112 OF LOT 2) Site Address 8255133RD PL Revision Date: 4/8/2021 Parcel# 30382100001014000002.0 Assessment= $2,247.76 Owner CIANCI, LISA F Secondary Owner Map ID: 182 Mailing Address 8245133RD PLACE SEBASTIAN FL 32958 Legal PLAT OF WAUREGAN ON FLEMING GRANT PBB 1-75 BEING MORE PART DESC AS FOLL BLK 14 S 1/2 LOT 2 & ALL LOT 3 Site Address 8245133RD PL Revision Date: 4/8/2021 Parcel If 30382100001014000004.0 Assessment= $2,247.76 Owner BAILEY, GEORGE W Secondary Owner Map ID: 183 Mailing Address 8225 133RD PL SEBASTIAN FL 32958 Legal PIAT OF WAUREGAN ON FLEMING GRANT PBB 1-75 BEING MORE PART DESC AS FOLL BLK 14LOTS 4&5 Site Address 8225133RD PL Revision Date: 4/8/2021 Page 15 180 N't'kry INDIAN RIVER COUNTY - DEPARTMENT OF UTILITY SERVICES NORTH COUNTY WATER / SEWER PROJECT S2S PHASE 2 - WATER ASSESSMENT PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL - RESOLUTION 3 Exhibit A ^' Parcel # 30382100001014000010.0 Assessment= $2,247.76 Owner 1MH VENTURES CORPORATION Secondary Owner - Map ID: 7 Mailing Address PO BOX 780832 SEBASTIAN FL 32978 Legal PLAT OF WAUREGAN ON FLEMING GRANT PBB 1-75 BEING MORE PART DESCAS FOLL BLK 14 LOTS 10,11 & 12" Site Address 8240133RD CT Revision Date: 4/8/2021 Parcel# 30382100001015000001.0 Assessment= $2,247.76 Owner COLBURN, KYLE A Secondary Owner Map ID: 130 Mailing Address 8255134TH ST SEBASTIAN FL 32958 Legal PLAT OF WAUREGAN ON FLEMING GRANT PBB 1-75 BEING MORE PART DESC AS FOLL BLK 15 LOT 1 & NWL Y 20 FT LOT 2 Site Address 8255134TH ST Revision Date: 4/8/2021 Parcel# 30382100001015000002.0 Assessment= $2,247.76 Owner CADLE, TERRY L Secondary Owner Map ID: 131 Mailing Address PO BOX 443 ROSELAND FL 32957 Legal PLAT OF WAUREGAN ON FLEMING GRANT PBB 1-75 BEING MORE PART DESC AS FOLL SEL Y 30 FT OF LOT 2; & N W LY 35FT OF LOT 3 BLK 15 Site Address 8245134TH ST Revision Date: 4/8/2021 Page 16 181 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY- DEPARTMENT OF UTILITY SERVICES NORTH COUNTY WATER / SEWER PROJECT S2S PHASE 2 - WATER ASSESSMENT_ j PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL - RESOLUTION 3 Exhibit A Parcel# 30382100001015000003.0 Assessment= $2,247.76 Owner MORROW, JACKA & JUDITH E Secondary Owner - Map ID: 132 Mailing Address 7550 NWS RIVER DR MEDLEY FL 33166 Legal PLAT OF WAUREGAN ON FLEMING GRANT PBB 1-75 BEING MORE PART DESCAS FOLL BLK 15 SELY 15 FT LOT 3 & ALL LOT 4 Site Address 8235134TH ST Revision Date: 4/8/2021 Parcel# 30382100001015000007.1 Assessment= $2,247.76 Owner ASSMUS, DIRK SecondaryOwner MODEL, TINA Map ID: 5 Mailing Address AM ECKPFAD 8B 63762 GROSSOSTHEIM GERMANY Legal PLAT OF WAUREGAN ON FLEMING GRANT PBB 1-75 BEING MORE PART DESC AS FOLL NWL Y 25 FT LOT 7 AND ALL OF LOT 8 Site Address 8230 133RD PL Revision Date: 4/8/2021 Parcel# 30382100001015000009.0 Assessment= $2,247.76 Owner RYDER, GARY Secondary Owner DALY, RICHARD Map ID: 153 Mailing Address 8240 133RD PL SEBASTIAN FL 32958 Legal PLAT OF WAUREGAN ON FLEMING GRANT PBB 1-75 BEING MORE PART DESC AS FOLL: BL K15LOTS 9&10 Site Address 8240133RD PL Revision Date: 4/8/2021 W Page 17 182 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY - DEPARTMENT OF UTILITY SERVICES "~'+ NORTH COUNTY WATER / SEWER PROJECT S2S PHASE 2 - WATER ASSESSMENT 144 / PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL- RESOLUTION 3 Exhibit A `;::�� Parcel# 30382100001015000011.0 Assessment= $2,247.76 Owner HERRERA, SIGIFREDO GARCIA & Secondary Owner GARCIA, ANALILIA Map ID: 154 Mailing Address 8250133RD PL SEBASTIAN FL 32958 Legal PLAT OF WAUREGAN ON FLEMING GRANT PBB 1-75 BEING MORE PART DESCAS FOLL BLK 15 LOTS 11&12 Site Address 8250133RD PL Revision Date: 4/8/2021 Parcel# 30382100001016000001.0 Assessment= $2,247.76 Owner WHITE, JAMES M and KELLI IO Secondary Owner Map ID: 155 Mailing Address 8255135TH ST SEBASTIAN FL 32958 Legal PLAT OF WAUREGAN ON FLEMING GRANT PBB 1-75 BEING MORE PART DESC AS FOLL BLK 16 LOTS 1&2 - Site Address 8255 135TH ST Revision Date: 4/8/2021 Parcel# 30382100001016000003.0 Assessment= $2,247.76 Owner PREUSS, RONNIE IRIS Secondary Owner MELNICK, GAIL Map ID: 156 Mailing Address 10996 MULBERRY ST SEBASTIAN FL 32958 Legal PLAT OF WAUREGAN ON FLEMING GRANT PBB 1-75 BEING MORE PART DESC AS FOLL BLK 16 LOTS 3 & 4 & NLY 1/2 LOT 5 Site Address 8235 135TH ST Revision Date: 4/8/2021 en Page 18 183 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY— DEPARTMENT OF UTILITY SERVICES NORTH COUNTY WATER / SEWER PROJECT S2S PHASE 2 — WATER ASSESSMENT PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL — RESOLUTION 3 Exhibit A`` Parcel# 30382100001016000010.0 Assessment= $2,247.76 Owner STARK, DAVID Secondary Owner Map ID: 160 Mailing Address PO BOX 355 ROSELAND FL 32958 Legal PLAT OF WAUREGAN ON FLEMING GRANT PBB 1-75 BEING MORE PART DESC AS FOLL NWL Y 35 FT OF LOT 10 & SELY 30FT OF LOT 11; BLK 16 (OR SK 409 PP 145) Site Address 8240134TH ST Revision Date: 4/8/2021 r Parcel # 30382100001016000011.0Assessment= $2,247.76 Owner MAGIE, JAMES & Secondary Owner MAGIE,JUDY Map ID: 161 Mailing Address 92 CRABBY RD LOCH SHELDRAKE NY 12759 Legal PLAT OF WAUREGAN ON FLEMING GRANT PBB 1-75 BEING MORE PART DESC AS FOLL BLK 16 N W LY 20 FT LOT 11 &ALL LOT 12 Site Address 13400 82ND CT Revision Date: 4/8/2021 Parcel# 30382100001999900001.0 Assessment= $2,247.76 Owner HYDEN, PATRICIA E Secondary Owner Map ID: 162 Mailing Address PO BOX 985 ROSELAND FL 32957 Legal PLAT OF WAUREGAN ON FLEMING GRANT PBB 1-75 BEING MORE PART DESC AS FOLLCOMMENCING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THAT CERTAIN UNNUMBERED LOT IN THE TOWN OF WAUREGAN SAID UNNUMBERED LOT LYING DIRECTLY ABOVE AND IN A NORTHWESTERLY DIRECTION FROM BLOCK 3 TOWN OF WAUREGAN AND SAID CORNER BEING FURTHER DESCRIBED AS THAT SOUTHEASTERLY CORNER ON SAID UNNUMBERED LOT WHERE BAY STREET AND MANATEE AVENUE INTERSECT THENCE RUN SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG BAY STREET TO A POINT THAT 15 282 FEET SOUTHWEST OF SAID CORNER AND ON THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID UNNUMBERED LOT SAID POINT BEING THE POINT OF BEGINNING THENCE RUN ON A STRAIGHT LINE IN A NORTHWESTERLY DIRECTION INTO THE WATERS OF THE SEBASTIAN RIVER SAID LINE BEING PARALLEL TO MANATEE AVENUE THEN RUN ALONG THE SHORE OF THE SEBASTIAN RIVER IN A SOUTHWESTERLY DIRECTION TO THE EASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF THE F.E.C. RAILWAY THENCE RUN IN A SOUTHEASTERLY DIRECTION ALONG THE EASTERLY RIGHT? OF -WAY LINE OF SAID F.E.C. RAILWAY TO THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID UNNUMBERED LOT THENCE RUN ALONG THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID UNNUMBERED LOT IN A NORTHEASTERLY DIRECTION TO THE POINT OF THE BEGINNING WITH ALL RIPARIAN RIGHTS APPERTAINING THERETO SAID ABOVE DESCRIBED LAND BEING IN THE TOWN OF WAUREGAN AS THE SAME IS RECORDED IN THE PLAT FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY FLORIDA (AND FORMERLY RECORDED IN BREVARD COUNTY FLORIDA) IN PLAT BOOK 1 PAGE 75 SAID LAND NOW LYING AND BEING IN INDIAN RIVER COUNTY FLORIDA Site Address 13305 83RD AV Revision Date: 4/8/2021 Page 19 184 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY — DEPARTMENT OF UTILITY SERVICES NORTH COUNTY WATER / SEWER PROJECT S2S PHASE 2 — WATER ASSESSMENT PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL — RESOLUTION 3 Exhibit ''."✓` Parcel# 30382100001999900002.0 Assessment= $2,247.76 Owner KLEMENS, KENNETH B and DORIS Secondary Owner Map ID: 163 Mailing Address 201 S KETCHAM AVE AMITYVILLE NY 11701 Legal PLAT OF WAUREGAN ON FLEMING GRANT PBB 1-75 BEING MORE PART DESC AS FOLL W 5 0 FT OF E 282 FT OF UNNUMBERED LOT LYING BETWEEN FEC RY & MANATEE AVE & N O F BAY ST AS D BK 59 PP 493 Site Address 1331183RD AV Revision Date: 4/8/2021 Parcel# 30382100001999900003.0 Assessment= $2,247.76 Owner GALLAGHER, MICHAELI Secondary Owner Map ID: 164 Mailing Address 13315 BAY ST SEBASTIAN FL 32958 Legal PLAT OF WAUREGAN ON FLEMING GRANT PBB 1-75 BEING MORE PART DESC AS FOLL THE W 66 FT OF E 232 FT OF UNNUMBERED LOT BETWEEN FEC RY & MANATEE AVE & N OF BAY ST AS D BK 85 PP 429 (OR BK 475, PP 333)" Site Address 13315 83RD AV Revision Date: 4/8/2021 Parcel# 30382100001999900004.0 Assessment= $2,247.76 Owner TOMSIC, JEFFREY (TR) & PATRICIA (TR) Secondary Owner Map ID: 165 Mailing Address 4013 MCTYRES COVE RD MIDLOTHIAN VA 23112 Legal PLAT OF WAUREGAN ON FLEMING GRANT PBB 1-75 BEING MORE PART DESC AS FOLL BEGINNING ATA POINT 100 FEET SOUTHWEST OF THE INTERSECTION OF THE NORTH RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF BAY STREET AND THE WEST RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF MANATES AVENUE OF THE PLAT OF WAUREGAN SUBDIVISION AS FILED IN THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF BREVARD COUNTY FLORIDA THENCE RUN SOUTHWESTWARDLY ALONG THE SAID NORTH RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF BAY STREET FOR A DISTANCE OF 66 FEETTO A POINT THENCE RUN NORTH 43 DEG 54 MIN WEST ON A PARALLEL TO AND 166 FEET FROM WAID WEST RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF MANATEE AVENUE INTO THE WATER OF SEBASTIAN BAY THENCE RUN ALONG THE WATERS EDGE OF SEBASTIAN BAY IN A NORTHERLY DIRECTION TO A POINT 100 FEET WEST OF THE WEST RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF MANATEE AVENUE THENCE RUN SOUTH 43 DEG 54 MIN EAST TO SAID POINT OF BEGINNING Site Address 13325 83RD AVE Revision Date: 4/8/2021 ro 3i {�d..s TR Page 20 185 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY — DEPARTMENT OF UTILITY SERVICES NORTH COUNTY WATER / SEWER PROJECT S2S PHASE 2 — WATER ASSESSMENT PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL — RESOLUTION 3 Exhibit Parcel# 3038210000199990000S.0 Assessment= $2,247.76 Owner BAKER, CHRISTOPHER JOHN Secondary Owner I Map ID: 166 Mailing Address 1332983RDAVE SEBASTIAN FL 32958 Legal PLAT OF WAUREGAN PBB 1-178/179 A PLOT OF LAND LYING IN THE TOWN OF WAUREGAN DESC AS FOLL FROM A POB AT THE INTRSCTN OF THE N R/W LINE OF BAY ST AND THE W R/W LINE OF MANATEE AVE OF THE PLAT OF WAUREGAN SID RUN SW AL SAID N R/W LINE OF BAY ST A DIST OF 100 FT TO A POINT TH R N43 -54W ON A LINE PARALLEL TO AND 100 FT FROM SAID W R/W LINE OF MANATEE AVE INTO THE WATERS OF SAN SEBASTIAN RIVER TH RUN AL THE WATERS OF SAN SEBASTIAN RIVER IN A NRLY DIRECTION TO THE W R/W OF MANATEE AVE EXT TH RUN S43 -54E AL SAID W R/W TO SAID POB Site Address 1332983RDAVE Revision Date: 4/8/2021 Parcel# 30382100001999900005.1 Assessment= $2,247.76 Owner WAUREGAN BOAT CLUB INC Secondary Owner Map ID: 200 Mailing Address PO BOX 718 ROSELAND FL 32957 Legal PLAT OF WAUREGAN ON FLEMING GRANT PBB 1-75 BEING MORE PART DESC AS FOLL ALL THAT 80.00 FT STRIP OF LAND CALLED MANATEE AVE OF ABAND RESOLUTION NO 2010-056 AS DESC IN OR SK 2430 PG 1233 LYING N OF BAY ST BETWEEN LOT 8 & THAT AREA MARKED "RESERVED" AS SHOWN ON THE PLAT OF THE TOWN OF WAUREGAN PBB 1-75 Site Address 1333183RD AV Revision Date: 4/8/2021 Parcel# 30382100005000000000.1 Assessment= $2,247.76 Owner INDIAN RIVER COUNTY Secondary Owner I I Map ID: 214 Mailing Address (LOC 4100 #5112) VERO BEACH FL 32960 Legal TOWNSITE OF ROSELAND PBS 1-43 ALL THAT PART OF BAIRD ST LYINGBETWEEN SEBAST IAN AVE & SEBASTIAN RIVER AS R BK 69 PPS 461 & 465. Site Address 12973 83RD AV Revision Date: 4/8/2021 Page 21 186 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY — DEPARTMENT OF UTILITY SERVICES rr �� NORTH COUNTY WATER / SEWER PROJECT S2S PHASE 2 — WATER ASSESSMENT PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL— RESOLUTION 3 Exhibit A ^a^° Parcel If 30382100005001000001.0 Assessment= $2,247.76 Owner BLACK, O'DONNA & WILLIAM A Secondary Owner Map ID: 139 Mailing Address 1299083RDAVE SEBASTIAN FL 32958 Legal TOWNSITE OFROSELAND PBS 1-43 LOTS 1 & 2 BLK 1 & INC THATABANALLEYWAYABU TTING LOTS 1 & 2 BLK 1 TOWNSITE OF ROSELAND PER IRC RESOLUTION 2015-025 AS DESC IN OR BK 2827 PG 1940 Site Address 1299083RDAV Revision Date: 4/8/2021 Parcel# 30382100005001000003.0 Assessment= $2,247.76 Owner SABOL, TRACY D Secondary Owner - Map ID: 140 Mailing Address 1525 LOUISIANA AVE SEBASTIAN FL 32958 Legal TOWNSITE OF ROSELAND PBS 1-43 LOT 3 BLK 1 & INC THAT ABAN ALLEYWAY ABUTTING LOT 3 BLK 1 TOWNSITE OF R OSELAND PER IRC RESOLUTION 2015-025 AS DESC IN 0 R BK 2827 PG 1940 Site Address 12980 83RD AV Revision Date: 4/8/2021 Parcel# 30382100005001000004.0 Assessment= $2,247.76 Owner CARLSON, CHARLOTTE A Secondary Owner Map ID: 141 Mailing Address PO BOX 507 ROSELAND FL 32957 Legal TOWNSITE OF ROSELAND PBS 1-43 LOTS 4 & 5 BLK 1 & INC THAT ABAN ALLEYWAY ABU TTING LOTS 4 & 5 BLK 1 TOW NSITE OF ROSELAND PER IRC RESOLUTION 2015-025 AS DESC IN OR SK 2827 PG 1940 Site Address 12974 83RD AV Revision Date: 4/8/2021 I. '_ .. - '.. ... -: :. .. .t �:_.` .--_--.:_'__ - .'- . c,igr•F::.-r.t ':y'ar!`tC � - '_oar Page 22 187 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY - DEPARTMENT OF UTILITY SERVICES cm) NORTH COUNTY WATER / SEWER PROJECT S2S PHASE 2 - WATER ASSESSMENT PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL-RESOLUTION3 ExhibitA Parcel# 3038210000S001000006.0 Assessment= $2,247.76 Owner GOODWIN, JOHN WJR and MARGARETE Secondary Owner Map ID: 142 Mailing Address PO BOX 1063 ROSELAND FL 32957 Legal TOWNSITE OF ROSELAND PBS 1-43 LOTS 6 & 7 BLK 1 & INC THAT ABAN ALLEYWAYABU MNG LOTS 6 & 7 BLK I TOW NSITE OF ROSELAND PER IRC RESOLUTION 2015-015 AS DESC IN OR BK 2827 PG 1940 Site Address 8220129TH PL Revision Date: 4/8/2021 Parcel $1 30382100005001000008.0 Assessment= $2,247.76 Owner SABOL, TRACY Secondary Owner WPM: 143 Mailing Address PO BOX 235 ROSELAND FL 32957 Legal TOWNSITE OF ROSELAND PBS 1-43 LOT 8 BLK 1 & INC THAT ABAN ALLEYWAY ABUTTING LOT 8 BLK 1 TOWNSITE OF R OSELAND PER IRC RESOLUTION 2015-025 AS DESC IN O R BK 2827 PG 1940 Site Address 12985 82ND CT Revision Date: 4/8/2021 Parcel# 30382100005001000009.0 Assessment= $2,247.76 Owner SABOL, TRACY Secondary Owner Map ID: 144 Mailing Address 1525 LOUISIANA AVE SEBASTIAN FL 32958 Legal TOWNSITE OF ROSELAND PBS 1-43 LOTS 9 & 10 BLK 1 & INC THAT ABAN ALLEYWAY AB UTTING LOTS 9 & 10 BLK 1 T OWNSITE OF ROSELAND PER IRC RESOLUTION 2015-025 AS DESC IN OR BK 2827 PG 1940 Site Address 12995 82ND CT Revision Date: 4/8/2021 Page 23 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY — DEPARTMENT OF UTILITY SERVICES r �; NORTH COUNTY WATER / SEWER PROJECT S2S PHASE 2 — WATER ASSESSMENT PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL— RESOLUTION 3 Exhibit A Parcel# 30382100005002000001.0 Assessment= $2,247.76 Owner MESSNER, DIANA H (LE) Secondary Owner MESSNER, DEEN M (LE) Map ID: 145 Mailing Address PO BOX 1182 ROSELAND FL 32978 Legal TOWNSITE OF ROSELAND BLK 2 LOTS 1 THRU 3 PBS 1-43 Site Address 1294683RDAV Revision Date: 4/8/2021 Parcel# 30382100005002000004.0 Assessment= $2,247.76 Owner MAHER, DANIEL JR Secondary Owner MAHER, ELIZABETH ANN (H) & Map ID: 146 Mailing Address 400 INDUSTRIAL CIR SEBASTIAN FL 32958 Legal TOWNSITE OF ROSELANDBLK 2 LOT 4 PBS 143 Site Address 12940 83RD AVE Revision Date: 4/8/2021 Parcel# 30382100005002000005.0 Assessment= $2,247.76 Owner MORRISON, JOHN F Secondary Owner Map ID: 147 Mailing Address P.O. BOX 775 ROSELAND FL 32957 Legal TOWNSITE OF ROSELANDBLK 2 LOT 5 PBS 143 Site Address 8280129TH CT Revision Date: 4/8/2021 189 Y /A INDIAN RIVER COUNTY - DEPARTMENT OF UTILITY SERVICES NORTH COUNTY WATER / SEWER PROJECT S2S PHASE 2- WATER ASSESSMENTE�,^ PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL - RESOLUTION 3 Exhibit A �• Qr m Parcel# 30382100005002000006.0 Assessment= $2,247.76 Owner LINCOLN, DAVID SCOTT Secondary Owner LINCOLN, KIM MARIE Map ID: 148 Mailing Address 12953 82ND CT SEBASTIAN FL 32958 Legal TOWNSITE OF ROSELAND BLK 2 LOT 6 PBS 1-43 Site Address 12953 82ND CT Revision Date: 4/8/2021 Parcel# 30382100005002000007.0 Assessment= $2,247.76 Owner HEINZ, NANCY Secondary Owner Map ID: 149 Mailing Address PO BOX 1282 ROSELAND FL 32957 Legal TOWNSITE OF ROSELANDBLK 2 LOT 7 PBS 1-43 Site Address 12955 82ND CT Revision Date: 4/8/2021 Parcel# 30382100005002000008.0 Assessment= $2,247.76 Owner BECKEL, KELLI E and TODD A Secondary Owner Map ID: 150 Mailing Address 12965 82ND CT SEBASTIAN FL 32958 Legal TOWNSITE OF ROSELANDBLK 2 LOTS 8,9 & 10 PBS 1-43" Site Address 12965 82ND CT Revision Date: 4/8/2021 x5"y� µ.. Page 25 190 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY - DEPARTMENT OF UTILITY SERVICES NORTH COUNTY WATER / SEWER PROJECT S2S PHASE 2 - WATER ASSESSMENT PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL- RESOLUTION 3 Exhibit A Parcel 30382100005003000001.0 Assessment= $2,247.76 Owner 33 CORPORATION INC Secondary Owner Map ID: 151 Mailing Address PO BOX 64-4397 VERO BEACH FL 32964 Legal TOWNSITE OF ROSELANDBLK 3 LOT 1 PBS 1-43 Site Address 1292683RDAV Revision Date: 4/8/2021 Parcel# 30382100005003000002.0 Assessment= $2,247.76 Owner 33 CORPORATION INC Secondary Owner Map ID: 152 Mailing Address PO BOX 64-4397 VERO BEACH FL 32964 Legal TOWNSITE OF ROSELANDBLK 3 LOT 2 PBS 1-43 Site Address 12920 83RD AV Revision Date: 4/8/2021 Parcel# 3038210000So03000003.0 Assessment= $2,247.76 Owner 33 CORPORATION INC Secondary Owner Map ID: 8 Mailing Address PO BOX 64-4397 VERO BEACH FL 32964 Legal TOWNSITE OF ROSELANDBLK 3 LOT 3 PBS 1-43 Site Address 12916 83RD AV Revision Date: 4/8/2021 Page 26 191 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY - DEPARTMENT OF UTILITY SERVICES NORTH COUNTY WATER / SEWER PROJECT S2S PHASE 2 - WATER ASSESSMENT�� PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL - RESOLUTION 3 Exhibit A^� Parcel# 30382100005003000004.0 Assessment= $2,247.76 Owner VAN HART, EARL N and JOHN H & Secondary Owner VAN HART, EARL JR Map ID: 127 Mailing Address PO BOX 1331 ROSELAND FL 32957 Legal TOWNSITE OF ROSELANDBLK 3 LOT 4 PBS 1-43 Site Address 1291283RDAV Revision Date: 4/8/2021 Parcel# 30382100005003000005.0 Assessment= $2,247.76 Owner SABOL, TRACY Secondary Owner Map ID: 128 Mailing Address 1525 LOUISIANA AVE SEBASTIAN FL 32958 Legal TOWNSITE OF ROSELANDBLK 3 LOT 5 PBS 1-43 Site Address 12906 83RD AV Revision Date: 4/8/2021 Parcel# 30382100005003000006.0 Assessment= $2,247.76 Owner KELSO, KIP 1R and CATHY LYNN Secondary Owner Map ID: 129 Mailing Address PO BOX 57 ROSELAND FL 32957 Legal TOWNSITE OF ROSELANDBLK 3 LOT 6 PBS 1-43 Site Address 12905 82ND CT Revision Date: 4/8/2021 71�°+'fe° �*, �'"ii� Page 27 192 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY - DEPARTMENT OF UTILITY SERVICES 3 NORTH COUNTY WATER / SEWER PROJECT S2S PHASE 2 - WATER ASSESSMENT PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL- RESOLUTION 3 1 Exhibit A Parcel# 30382100005003000007.0 1 Assessment= $2,247.76 Owner 33 CORPORATION INC Secondary Owner I i Map ID: 9 Mailing Address PO BOX 64-4397 VERO BEACH FL 32964 Legal TOWNSITE OF ROSELANDBLK 3 LOTS 7 & 8 PBS 1-43 1 I I I Site Address 12915 82ND CT y Revision Date: 4/8/2021 Parcel# 30382100005003000009.0 Assessment= $2,247.76 Owner MOREL, RICKY DALE Secondary Owner 1 I Map ID: 120 Mailing Address 8285 129TH CT I SEBASTIAN FL 32958 1 Legal TOWNSITE OF ROSELANDBLK 3 LOTS 9 & 10 PBS 1-43 1 I 1 Site Address 8285 129TH CT 1 Revision Date: 4/8/2021 Parcel# 30382100005005000006.0 I Assessment= $2,247.76 Owner GONZALEZ, DANIEL I Secondary Owner I i I Map ID: 107 Mailing Address 13305 ROSELAND RD #69 ROSELAND FL 32957 1 Legal TOWNSITE OF ROSELANDBLK 5 LOT 6 PBS 1-43 1 I I 1 I I Site Address 12805 82ND Cr I Revision Date: 4/8/2021 193 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY — DEPARTMENT OF UTILITY SERVICES � ? NORTH COUNTY WATER / SEWER PROJECT S2S PHASE 2 — WATER ASSESSMENT PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL— RESOLUTION 3 Exhibit A Parcel# 30382100005005000007.0 Assessment= $2,247.76 Owner PO WELL, GLENN E & Secondary Owner KIMBERLY, W SCOTT Map ID: 13 Mailing Address PO BOX 450 ROSELAND FL 31957 Legal TOWNSITE OF ROSELANDBLK 5 LOTS 7,8 & 9 PBS 1-43" Site Address 1283582ND CT Revision Date: 4/8/2021 Parcel# 30382100005006000002.0 Assessment= $2,247.76 Owner COOPER, SHAMBALA ANN Secondary Owner Map ID: 95 Mailing Address 412 DORSET DR COCOA BEACH FL 32931 Legal TOWNSITE OF ROSELAND PBS 1-43 LOT 2 LESS THE E 15.00 FT ALSOINC LOTS 3 & 4 BLK 6 Site Address 12846 82ND Cr { Revision Date: 4/8/2021 Parcel# 30382100005006000005.0 I Assessment= $2,247.76 Owner GONZALEZ, DANIEL III I Secondary Owner Map ID: 96 Mailing Address 13305 ROSELAND RD BOX 69 ROSELAND FL 32957 Legal TOWNSITE OF ROSELANDBLK 6 LOT 5 PBS 1-43 Site Address 12820 82ND CT Revision Date: 4/8/2021 Page 29 194 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY — DEPARTMENT OF UTILITY SERVICES NORTH COUNTY WATER / SEWER PROJECT S2S PHASE 2 — WATER ASSESSMENT PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL — RESOLUTION 3 Exhibit Parcel If 30382100005008000001.0 Assessment= $2,247.76 Owner ROSELAND UNITED METHODIST CHURCH INC Secondary Owner Map ID: 201 Mailing Address PO BOX 157 ROSELAND FL 32957 Legal TOWNSITE OF ROSELANDBLK 8 LOTS 1 & 2 PBS 1-43 Site Address 1194082ND CT Revision Date: 4/8/2021 Parcel# 30382100005008000003.0 Assessment= $2,247.76 Owner RICHARDSON, PATRICIA & Secondary Owner HERMAN, MARK W TRICIA Map ID: 97 Mailing Address PO BOX 236 ROSELAND FL 32957 Legal TOWNSITE OF ROSELANDBLK 8 LOTS 3,4 & S PBS I-43" Site Address 12920 82ND CT Revision Date: 4/8/2021 Parcel# 30382100005009000001.0 Assessment= $2,247.76 Owner ROSELAND UNITED METHODIST CHURCH INC Secondary Owner Map ID: 87 Mailing Address PO BOX 157 ROSELAND FL 32957 Legal TOWNSITE OF ROSELANDBLK 9 LOTS 1 TO 3 INC PBS 1-43 Site Address 12960 82ND CT Revision Date: 4/8/2021 Page 30 195 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY - DEPARTMENT OF UTILITY SERVICES NORTH COUNTY WATER / SEWER PROJECT S2S PHASE 2 - WATER ASSESSMENT PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL- RESOLUTION 3 Exhibit A ' Parcel# 30382100005009000004.0 Assessment= $2,247.76 Owner ROSELAND UNITED METHODIST CHURCH Secondary Owner Map ID: 207 Mailing Address PO BOX 257 ROSELAND FL 32957 Legal TOWNSITE OF ROSELANDBLK 9 LOTS 4 & 5 INC PBS 1-43 Site Address 1294882ND CT Revision Date: 4/8/2021 Parcel# 30382100005010000003.0 Assessment= $2,247.76 Owner BURKEN, DAVID R and CARRIE Secondary Owner Map ID: 27 Mailing Address 14460 BOTH AVE SEBASTIAN FL 32958 Legal TOWNSITE OF ROSELANDBLK 10 LOTS 1 TO 4INC PBS 1-43 Site Address - 12980 82ND CT I Revision Date: 4/8/2021 Parcel # 30382100005010000005.0 Assessment= $2,247.76 Owner HOLTZCLAW, DAVID C & SHARON E Secondary Owner Map ID: 28 Mailing Address 1949 SUNSET DR VERO BEACH FL 32962 Legal TOWNSITE OF ROSELANDBLK 10 LOT S PBS 1-43 Site Address 12970 82ND CT Revision Date: 4/8/2021 Page 31 196 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY- DEPARTMENT OF UTILITY SERVICES NORTH COUNTY WATER / SEWER PROJECT S2S PHASE 2 - WATER ASSESSMENT ` PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL- RESOLUTION 3 Exhibit A •'�f Parcel# 30382100005031000001.0 Assessment= $2,247.76 Owner WOOD, ANTHONY T& AMY M Secondary Owner Map ID. 102 Mailing Address 1308583RDAVENUE SEBASTIAN FL 32958 Legal TOWNSITE OF ROSELANDBLK B-1 LOTS 1&2 RI VER FRONTLESS R/WPBS 1-43 Site Address 1308583RDAV Revision Date: 4/8/2021 Parcel# 30382100005031000003.0 Assessment= $2,247.76 Owner JOHNSON, LEONARD L & ELAINE G Secondary Owner Map ID: 103 Mailing Address PO BOX 52 ROSELAND FL 32957 Legal TOWNSITE OF ROSELANDBLK B-1 LOT 3 RIVER FRONT PBS 1-43 Site Address 13035 83RD AV I Revision Date: 4/8/2021 Parcel# 30382100005032000001.0 1 Assessment= $2,247.76 Owner BAKER, SUSAN (LE) i Secondary Owner BAKER, ERNEST BARDLEY (LE) BAKER, SUSAN T (TR) Map ID: 104 Mailing Address PO BOX 415 ROSELAND FL 32957 Legal TOWNSITE OF ROSELANDBLK B-2 LOTS 1 & 2 RIVER FRONT PBS 1-43 Site Address 12995 83RD AV Revision Date: 4/8/2021 tea_*- Page 32 197 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY— DEPARTMENT OF UTILITY SERVICES NORTH COUNTY WATER / SEWER PROJECT S2S PHASE 2 — WATER ASSESSMENT PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL — RESOLUTION 3 Exhibit k :^ Parcel If 30382100005032000003.0 Assessment= $2,247.76 Owner COLBERT, JERROLD M (TR) Secondary Owner - Map ID: 105 Mailing Address PO BOX 96 ROSELAND FL 32957 Legal TOWNSITE OF ROSELANDBLK B-2 LOTS RIVER FRONT PBS 1-43 Site Address 1298583RDAV Revision Date: 4/8/2021 Parcel# 30382100005032000004.0 Assessment= $2,247.76 Owner HOROWITZ, STUART and LI CHEN Secondary Owner Map ID: 106 Mailing Address 12975 83RD AVE SEBASTIAN FL 32958 Legal TOWNSITE OF ROSELANDBLK B-2 LOTS 4 & 5 RIVER FRONT PBS 1-43 Site Address 12975 83RD AV Revision Date: 4/8/2021 Parcel# 30382100005033000001.0 Assessment= $2,247.76 Owner INDIAN RIVER COUNTY Secondary Owner Map ID: 211 Mailing Address (LOC 4100 #5113) VERO BEACH FL 32960 Legal TOWNSITE OF ROSELANDALL OF RIVER FRONT BLK B-3 Site Address 12955 83RD AV Revision Date: 4/8/2021 Page 33 198 yfYk,. INDIAN RIVER COUNTY - DEPARTMENT OF UTILITY SERVICES NORTH COUNTY WATER / SEWER PROJECT S2S PHASE 2 - WATER ASSESSMENT PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL- RESOLUTION 3 Exhibit A� Parcel# 30382100005034000001.0 Assessment= $2,247.76 Owner INDIAN RIVER COUNTY Secondary Owner Mop ID: 212 Mailing Address (LOC4100#5114) VERO BEACH FL 32960 Legal TOWNSITE OF ROSELANDBLK B-4 ALL OF RIVE R FRONT Site Address 1191583RD AV Revision Date: 4/8/2021 Parcel# 30382100005037000001.0 Assessment= $2,247.76 Owner SIGGINS, AARON A & ELIZABETH A Secondary Owner Map ID: 15 Mailing Address 1127 LAPRESA AVE SPRING VALLEY CA 91977 Legal TOWNSITE OF ROSELANDBLK B-2 LOTS 1 & 2 RAILROAD FRONT PBS 1-43 Site Address 8280130TH ST Revision Date: 4/8/2021 Parcel# 30382100005037000003.0 Assessment= $2,247.76 Owner BECKER, CHARLENE & Secondary Owner SIDEY, JEAN Map ID: 80 Mailing Address 149 ROYAL PALM ST SEBASTIAN FL 32958 Legal TOWNSITE OF ROSELANDBLK B-2 LOTS 3,4 & 5 RAILROAD FRONT PBS 1-43" Site Address 8250130TH ST Revision Date: 4/8/2021 Page 34 199 ..•,,; INDIAN RIVER COUNTY - DEPARTMENT OF UTILITY SERVICES a j may: NORTH COUNTY WATER / SEWER PROJECT S2S PHASE 2 - WATER ASSESSMENT PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL - RESOLUTION 3 Exhibit Parcel# 30381500001001000015.0 Assessment= $2,247.76 Owner SCOTT, JOHN S and DENA E Secondary Owner Map ID: 48 Mailing Address 1435580THAVE SEBASTIAN FL 31958 Legal ERCILDOUNE HEIGHTS SUB NO 1 PBI 3-74 LOT 15 BLKA & LOT 16 BLKA ERC ILDOUN E HGT5 SUB NO 2 PBI 4-5 & ALSO INCA PARC OF LAND LYING BETWEEN LOTS IS &16 OF ABOVE MENTIONED SUBS & BULKHEAD LI NE AS IN R BK 222 PP 779 & R BK 218 PP65 Site Address 1435580THAV Revision Date: 4/8/2021 Parcel# 30382500001002000003.0 Assessment= $2,247.76 Owner FOWLER, OCIA (TRS) Secondary Owner FOWLER, CHARLES W (TRS) Map ID: 50 Mailing Address 1437080TH AVENUE SEBASTIAN FL 32958 Legal ERCILDOUNE HEIGHTS SUB NO 1 BLK B LOT 3 PBI 3-74 Site Address 14370 80TH AV Revision Date: 4/8/2021 Parcel# 30382500001002000004.0 Assessment= $2,247.76 Owner MILYAK, ALBERT JOHN and DIANNE B 1 Secondary Owner Map ID: 51 Mailing Address 14365 78TH AVE SEBASTIAN FL 32958 Legal ERCILDOUNE HEIGHTS SUB NO i BLK B LOT 4 PBI 3-74 Site Address 14365 78TH AV Revision Date: 4/8/2021 s Page 35 200 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY - DEPARTMENT OF UTILITY SERVICES NORTH COUNTY WATER / SEWER PROJECT S2S PHASE 2 - WATER ASSESSMENT PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL - RESOLUTION 3 Exhibit A Parcel# 30382500002001000017.0 Assessment= $2,247.76 Owner TRAFICANTE, RUSSELL J Secondary Owner Map ID. 53 Mailing Address 1431580THAVE SEBASTIAN FL 32958 Legal ERCILDOUNE HEIGHTS SUB NO 2 BLK A LOT 17 CBI 4-5 Site Address 1432580THAV Revision Date: 4/8/2021 Parcel# 30382500002001000018.0 Assessment= $2,247.76 Owner TRAFICANTE, RUSSELL & BETTI Secondary Owner Map ID: 54 Mailing Address 14315 80TH AVE SEBASTIAN FL 32958 Legal ERCILDOUNE HEIGHTS SUB NO 2 BLK A LOT 18 PBI 4-5 Site Address 14315 80TH AV Revision Date: 4/8/2021 Parcel# 30382500002001000019.0 Assessment= $2,247.76 Owner GAVIN, DEAN R (TR) & ROSE M (TR) Secondary Owner Map ID: 55 Mailing Address 14265 80TH AVE SEBASTIAN FL 32958 Legal ERCILDOUNE HEIGHTS SUB NO 2 BLK A LOTS 19 & 20 PBI 4-5 Site Address 14265 80TH AV Revision Date: 4/8/2021 Page 36 201 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY - DEPARTMENT OF UTILITY SERVICES NORTH COUNTY WATER / SEWER PROJECT S2S PHASE 2 - WATER ASSESSMENT PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL - RESOLUTION 3 Exhibit A '•pro' Parcel# 30382500002001000021.0 Assessment= $2,247.76 Owner WEGEL, FRANK& KATHERINEH Secondary Owner Map ID: 56 Mailing Address 8060142ND ST SEBASTIAN FL 32958 Legal ERCILDOUNE HEIGHTS SUB NO 2 BLKA LOT 21 PBI 4-5 Site Address 8060142ND ST Revision Date: 4/8/2021 Parcel # 30382500002001000022.0 Assessment= $2,247.76 Owner SHIPLEY, JOHN Wand SHARON M Secondary Owner Map ID: 57 Mailing Address 8080142ND ST SEBASTIAN FL 32958 Legal ERCILDOUNE HEIGHTS SUB NO 2 BLK A LOT 22 PBI 4-5 Site Address 8080142ND ST Revision Date: 4/8/2021 Parcel # 30382500002002000007.0 Assessment= $2,247.76 Owner RIZZER, JOHN A 1 Secondary Owner I I 1 Map ID: 58 Mailing Address 14345 78TH AVE I SEBASTIAN FL 32958 I Legal ERCILDOUNE HEIGHTS SUB NO 2 BLK B LOT 7 PBI 4-5 Site Address 14345 78TH AV Revision Date: 4/8/2021 Page 37 202 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY - DEPARTMENT OF UTILITY SERVICES NORTH COUNTY WATER / SEWER PROJECT S2S PHASE 2 - WATER ASSESSMENT PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL- RESOLUTION 3 y�' 4r Exhibit A I,�p� Parcel# 30382500001002000008.0 Assessment= $2,247.76 Owner MELLIN, ROBERT P and DAWN K Secondary Owner Map ID: 59 Mailing Address 1432578TH AVE SEBASTIAN FL 32958 Legal ERCILDOUNE HEIGHTS SUB NO 2 BLK B LOTS PBI 4-5 Site Address 1432578TH AV Revision Date: 4/8/2021 Parcel # 30382500002002000009.0 Assessment= $2,247.76 Owner W EDDI NGTON, DONALD JON & CINDY SUE Secondary Owner Map ID: 60 Mailing Address 14300 80TH AVE SEBASTIAN FL 32958 Legal ERCILDOUNE HEIGHTS SUB NO 2 BLK B LOT 9 PBI 4-5 Site Address 14300 80TH AV Revision Date: 4/8/2021 Parcel# 30382500002002000010.0 Assessment= $2,247.76 Owner LAZEA, EMILIA Secondary Owner Map ID: 61 Mailing Address 152 OCEAN ST I LYNN MA 01902 1 Legal ERCILDOUNE HEIGHTS SUB NO 2 BLK B LOT 10 PBI 4-5 Site Address 7800143RD ST Revision Date: 4/8/2021 203 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY - DEPARTMENT OF UTILITY SERVICES NORTH COUNTY WATER / SEWER PROJECT S2S PHASE 2 - WATER ASSESSMENT PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL- RESOLUTION 3 Exhibit A "mom Parcel# 30382500002002000011.0 Assessment= $2,247.76 Owner JOHNSON, ERIC N and KAREN E & Secondary Owner JOHNSON, KEVIN SCOTT & JESSICA Map ID: 62 Mailing Address 7870145TH ST SEBASTIAN FL 31958 Legal ERCILDOUNE HEIGHTS SUB NO 1 BLK B LOT 11 PB14-5 Site Address 1436080THAV Revision Date: 4/8/2021 Parcel# 30382500002006000001.0 Assessment= $2,247.76 Owner KINCAID, DALE Secondary Owner Map ID: 63 Mailing Address 7999143RD ST SEBASTIAN FL 32958 Legal ERCILDOUNE HEIGHTS SUB NO 2 BLK F LOT 1 PBI 4-5 Site Address 7999143RD ST Revision Date: 4/8/2021 Parcel# 30382500002006000002.0 Assessment= $2,247.76 Owner BOORSE, FRANCES C (LE) Secondary Owner BOORSE, CURTIS F MCMILLAN, CAREN A Map ID: 64 Mailing Address 7989 143RD ST SEBASTIAN FL 32958 Legal ERCILDOUNE HEIGHTS SUB NO 2 BLK F LOT 2 PBI 4-5 Site Address 7989143RD ST Revision Date: 4/8/2021 w. + F' .#'..� Page 39 204 ID_ INDIAN RIVER COUNTY — DEPARTMENT OF UTILITY SERVICES NORTH COUNTY WATER / SEWER PROJECT S2S PHASE 2 — WATER ASSESSMENTPRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL —RESOLUTION 3 I Exhibit A Parcel # 30382500002006000003.0 Assessment= $2,247.76 Owner MINNICH, MARK Secondary Owner MAINHART, MARTHA I i Map ID: 65 Mailing Address 7840142ND WAY SEBASTIAN FL 32958 Legal ERCILDOUNE HEIGHTS SUBDIVISION NO 2 BLK F LOT 3 PBI4 - 5 I Site Address 7840142ND WAY I� Revision Date: I 4/8/2021 :.,.14... ' Parcel# 30382500002006000004.0 I Assessment= $2,247.76 Owner PALMER, GREGORY 8 & I Secondary Owner RICHARDS, KAREN M I I I Map ID: 66 Mailing Address 7880142ND WAY I SEBASTIAN FL 32958 1 Legal ERCILDOUNE HEIGHTS SUB NO 2 PBI 4-5 A PORT OF LOT 4 BLK F MORE PARTDESC AS FOLL: COM AT SW COR SAID LOT 4 B LK F; RUN E 86.45 FT TO POB OF FOLL DESCPARC: TH N 43 DEG 17 MIN 20 SEC W 145.21 FT; TH N 63 DEG 04 MIN 00 SEC E 135.95 FT; TH S 54 DEG 28 MIN 35 SEC E 78.66 FT; TH S 35 DEG 10 MIN 00 SEC W 148.72 FTTO POB. 1 I I I Site Address 7880142ND WAY j Revision Date: 4/8/2021 Parcel# 30382500002006000004.1 Assessment= $2,247.76 Owner WUNDERLICH, JOEL & JACKIE - Secondary Owner I Map ID: 67 Mailing Address 14240 80TH AVE 1 SEBASTIAN FL 32958 Legal ERCILDOUNE HEIGHTS SUB NO2 PBI 4-5 A PORT OF LOT 4 BLK F MORE PARTDESC AS; BEG AT SW COR OF SAID LOT 4; RU N N07 DEG 04 MIN 27 SEC W 106.51 FT; THS 43 DEG 17 MIN 20 SEC E 145.21'FT; THRUN W86.45 FT TO POB & ALSO ALL LOT 5 (OR BK 0730 PP 323) (OR BK 1339 PP 863) I I I 1 Site Address 14240 80TH AV ' Revision Date: 4/8/2021 Page 40 205 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY - DEPARTMENT OF UTILITY SERVICES NORTH COUNTY WATER / SEWER PROJECT S2S PHASE 2 - WATER ASSESSMENT PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL - RESOLUTION 3 (i"" ExhibitA � Parcel 30382500002007000001.0 Assessment= $2,247.76 Owner BOWEN, JEFFREY F and PAMELA 5 Secondary Owner Map ID: 68 Mailing Address 14190815TAVE SEBASTIAN FL 32958 Legal ERCILDOUNE HEIGHTS SUB NO 2 BLK G LOT 1 PBI 4-5 Site Address 1419081STAV Revision Date: 4/8/2021 Parcel# 30382500002007000002.0 Assessment= $2,247.76 Owner HENRY, CAREY & TIFFINIE SeconclarV Owner Map ID: 69 Mailing Address 8065 142ND ST SEBASTIAN FL 32958 Legal ERCILDOUNE HEIGHTS SUB NO 2 BLK G LOT 2 PBI 4-5 Site Address 8065 142ND ST Revision Date: 4/8/2021 Parcel 30382500002007000003.0 I Assessment= $2,247.76 Owner NEWPORT HOLDINGS LLC i Secondary Owner Map ID: 70 Mailing Address 52 WALTHAM ST LEXINGTON MA 02421-5407 Legal ERCILDOUNE HEIGHTS SUBDIVISION NO 2 PBI 4 - 5 BLK G LOT 3 Site Address 8045142ND ST Revision Date: 4/8/2021 Page 41 206 w+� INDIAN RIVER COUNTY - DEPARTMENT OF UTILITY SERVICES NORTH COUNTY WATER / SEWER PROJECT S2S PHASE 2 - WATER ASSESSMENT PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL- RESOLUTION 3 Exhibit A Parcel# 30382500002007000004.0 Assessment= $2,247.76 Owner HECK, JAMES R and BONNIE L Secondary Owner Map ID: 71 Mailing Address 8035142ND ST SEBASTIAN FL 32958 Legal ERCILDOUNE HEIGHTS SUB NO 2 BLK G LOT 4 PBI 4-5 Site Address 8035142ND ST Revision Date: 4/8/2021 Parcel# 30382500002007000005.0 Assessment= $2,247.76 Owner BROWN, ROY (TR) Secondary Owner Map ID: 72 Mailing Address 8025142ND ST SEBASTIAN FL 32958 Legal ERCILDOUNE HEIGHTS SUB NO 2 BLK G LOT 5 PBI 4-5 Site Address 8025 142ND ST Revision Date: 4/8/2021 Parcel # 30382500002007000006.0 Assessment= $2,247.76 Owner MARK, JAMES E and MELINDA M Secondary Owner Map ID: 73 Mailing Address 8005142ND ST SEBASTIAN FL 32958 Legal ERCILDOUNE HEIGHTS SUB NO 2 BLK G LOT 6 PBI 4-5 Site Address 8005 142ND ST Revision Date: 4/8/2021 Page 42 207 a... , INDIAN RIVER COUNTY- DEPARTMENT OF UTILITY SERVICES NORTH COUNTY WATER / SEWER PROJECT S2S PHASE 2 - WATER ASSESSMENT PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL - RESOLUTION 3 1 Exhibit A Parcel# 30382500002007000007.0 1 Assessment= $2,247.76 Owner BENNETT, LORI i Secondary Owner f I Map ID: 74 Mailing Address 8006141STST SEBASTIAN FL 32958 Legal ERCILDOUNE HEIGHTS SUB NO 2 BLK G LOT 7 PBI 4-5 1 1 i Site Address 8006141STST I Revision Date: 4/8/2021 Parcel# 30382500002007000008.0 I Assessment= $2,247.76 Owner POWELL, HOWARD T and HILDA T i Secondary Owner 1 i Map ID: 75 Mailing Address 8026141ST ST SEBASTIAN FL 32958 1 Legal ERCILDOUNE HEIGHTS SUB NO 2 BLK G LOT 8 PBI 4-5 i 1 I Site Address 8026141ST ST I i Revision Date: 4/8/2021 Parcel# 30382500002007000009.0 1 Assessment= $2,247.76 Owner SHELHAMER, DONALD and VIRGINIA i Secondary Owner Map ID: 76 Mailing Address PO BOX 160 ROSELAND FL 32957 Legal ERCILDOUNE HEIGHTS SUB NO 2 BLK G LOT 9 PBI 4-5 Site Address 8036141ST ST I Revision Date: 4/8/2021 Page 43 208 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY- DEPARTMENT OF UTILITY SERVICES NORTH COUNTY WATER / SEWER PROJECT S2S PHASE 2 - WATER ASSESSMENT PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL- RESOLUTION 3 I Exhibit A ' �^ Parcel# 30382500002007000010.0 1 Assessment= $2,247.76 Owner BECK, DIANE M & SecondaryOwner RITTER, DAVID G i Map ID: 77 Mailing Address 8046141STST i SEBASTIAN FL 32958 1 Legal ERCILDOUNE HEIGHTS SUB NO 1 BLKG LOT 10 PBI 4-5 1 i Site Address 8046141STST I Revision Date: 4/8/2021 Parcel # 30382500002007000011.0 1 Assessment= $2,247.76 Owner PARKINS, DONNA JEAN ILE) Secondary Owner PARKINS, DEREK ALLEN I i Map ID: 78 Mailing Address 8066141ST ST 1 SEBASTIAN FL 32958 1 Legal ERCILDOUNE HEIGHTS SUB NO 2 BLK G LOT 11 PBI 4-5 } I I i Site Address 8066 141ST ST I Revision Date: 4/8/2021 Parcel# 30382500002007000012.0 Assessment= $2,247.76 Owner STATES, SANDRA ANNE 1 Secondary Owner I i Map ID: 79 Mailing Address 14150 81ST AVE SEBASTIAN FL 32958 Legal ERCILDOUNE HEIGHTS SUB NO 2 BLK G LOT 12 PBI 4-5 1 I I I I Site Address 14150 81ST AV Revision Date: 4/8/2021 Page 44 209 ,,, * INDIAN RIVER COUNTY - DEPARTMENT OF UTILITY SERVICES f iw NORTH COUNTY WATER / SEWER PROJECT S2S PHASE 2 - WATER ASSESSMENT PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL -RESOLUTION 3 Exhibit A Parcel# 30382500002008000001.0 Assessment= $2,247.76 Owner STOCKER, REX (TR) Secondary Owner Map ID: 17 Mailing Address 1409581STAVE SEBASTIAN FL 32958 Legal ERCILDOUNE HEIGHTS SUB NO 2 BLK H LOT 1 PBI 4-5 Site Address 1409081STAV Revision Date: 4/8/2021 Parcel# 30382500002008000002.0 Assessment= $2,247.76 Owner RODRIGUEZ, JOSEPH A and LINDA M Secondary Owner Map ID: 18 Mailing Address 8065141ST ST SEBASTIAN FL 32958 Legal ERCILDOUNE HEIGHTS SUB NO 2 BLK H LOT 2 PBI 4-5 Site Address 8065 141ST ST Revision Date: 4/8/2021 Parcel# 30382500002008000003.0 Assessment= $2,247.76 Owner COLEMAN, ROBERT M and RHONDA K Secondary Owner Map ID: 19 Mailing Address 8045 141ST ST SEBASTIAN FL 32958 Legal ERCILDOUNE HEIGHTS SUB NO 2 BLK H LOT 3 PBI 4-5 Site Address 8045 141ST ST Revision Date: 4/8/2021 Page 45 210 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY - DEPARTMENT OF UTILITY SERVICES NORTH COUNTY WATER / SEWER PROJECT S2S PHASE 2 - WATER ASSESSMENT PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL- RESOLUTION 3 a�' •r, Exhibit A Parcel If 30382500002008000004.0 Assessment= $2,247.76 Owner KELLY, KENNETH C and 5HIRLEYA Secondary Owner Mop ID: 20 Mailing Address 80351415TST SEBASTIAN FL 32958 1 Legal ERCILDOUNE HEIGHTS SUB NO 2 BLK H LOT 4 PSI 4-5 1 I I 1 I Site Address 8035141ST ST Revision Date: 4/8/2021 Parcel# 30382500002008000005.0 Assessment= $2,247.76 Owner BECKETT, KENNETH G and DOLORES R Secondary Owner I I I Map ID: 21 Mailing Address 8025141ST ST I SEBASTIAN FL 32958 1 Legal ERCILDOUNE HEIGHTS SUB NO 2 BLK H LOT 5 PBI 4-5 i I Site Address 8025141ST ST I Revision Date: 4/8/2021 Parcel# 30382500002008000006.0 1 Assessment= $2,247.76 Owner REGO, CINDY A I Secondary Owner I 1 I Map ID: 22 Mailing Address 8005141ST ST i SEBASTIAN FL 32958 1 Legal ERCILDOUNE HEIGHTS SUBDIVISION NO 2 BLK H LOT 6 PBI 4-5 I I I I I i Site Address 8005 141ST ST Revision Date: 4/8/2021 24z,. Page 46 211 u•r+� INDIAN RIVER COUNTY - DEPARTMENT OF UTILITY SERVICES NORTH COUNTY WATER / SEWER PROJECT S2S PHASE 2 - WATER ASSESSMENT PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL- RESOLUTION 3 Exhibit A Parcel # 30382500002008000007.0 Assessment= $2,247.76 Owner HENDERSON, KAMAIA L and BION A Secondary Owner Map ID: 23 Mailing Address 8006140TH ST l SEBASTIAN FL 32958 Legal ERCILDOUNE HEIGHTS SUB NO 2 BLK H LOT 7 PBI 4-5 i Site Address 8006140TH ST Revision Date: 4/8/2021 Parcel# 30382500002008000008.0 Assessment= $2,247.76 Owner CLARKE, JENNIFER L Secondary Owner i Map ID: 24 Mailing Address 8036140TH ST SEBASTIAN FL 32958 Legal ERCILDOUNE HEIGHTS SUBDIVISION NO 2 BLK H LOT 8 PBI 4 - 5 i I Site Address 8036 140TH ST j Revision Date: 4/8/2021 Parcel# 30382500002008000009.0 Assessment= $2,247.76 Owner ALTER, STANLEY 1 and CAROLINE S Secondary Owner Map ID: 25 Mailing Address 8046140TH ST SEBASTIAN FL 32958 Legal ERCILDOUNE HEIGHTS SUB NO 2 BLK H LOTS 9 & 10 PBI 4-5 f Site Address 8046140TH ST Revision Date: 4/8/2021 Page 47 212 W`'rk INDIAN RIVER COUNTY — DEPARTMENT Of UTILITY SERVICES NORTH COUNTY WATER / SEWER PROJECT S2S PHASE 2 — WATER ASSESSMENT i PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL— RESOLUTION 3 Exhibit A',*^ Parcel# 30382500002008000011.0 Assessment= $2,247.76 Owner COLEMAN, RHONDA KAY Secondary Owner COLEMAN, ROBERT M Map ID: 26 Mailing Address 8045141STST SEBASTIAN FL 32958 Legal ERCILDOUNE HEIGHTS SUB NO 2 BLK H LOT 11 PBI 4-5 Site Address 8066140TH ST Revision Date: 4/8/2021 Parcel# 30382500002008000012.0 Assessment= $2,247.76 Owner HALCOMB, GEORGE M (TR) Secondary Owner Map ID: 16 Mailing Address PO BOX 790 VERSAILLES IN 47042 Legal ERCILDOUNE HEIGHTS SUB NO 2 BLK H LOT 12 PBI 4-5 Site Address 14020 81ST AV Revision Date: 4/8/2021 Parcel# 30382500002011000001.0 Assessment= $2,247.76 Owner LECK, RICHARD C and KATHY C Secondary Owner Map ID: 29 Mailing Address 14195 81ST AVE SEBASTIAN FL 32958 Legal ERCILDOUNE HEIGHTS SUB NO 2 BLK K LOT 1 PBI 4-5 Site Address 14195 81ST AV Revision Date: 4/8/2021 — r.T Page 48 213 N iR, INDIAN RIVER COUNTY — DEPARTMENT OF UTILITY SERVICES NORTH COUNTY WATER / SEWER PROJECT S2S PHASE 2 — WATER ASSESSMENT PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL— RESOLUTION 3 Exhibit A Parcel# 30382500001011000002.0 Assessment= $2,247.76 Owner WILLIAMSON, PHILIP JOHN & ANN MEADOW Secondary Owner Map ID: 30 Mailing Address 6680 LUSTER DRIVE HIGHLAND MD 20777 Legal ERCILDOUNE HEIGHTS SUB NO 2 BLK K LOT 2 PBI 4-5 s Site Address 1415581STAV Revision Date: 4/8/2021 Parcel 30382500002011000003.0 i Assessment= $2,247.76 Owner RYAN, SCOTT K Secondary Owner Map ID: 31 Mailing Address PO BOX 620226 OVIEDO FL 32762 Legal ERCILDOUNE HEIGHTS SUB NO 2 BLK K LOT 3 PBI 4-5 Site Address 14125 81ST AV Revision Date: 4/8/2021 Parcel If 30382500002011000004.0 Assessment= $2,247.76 Owner STOCKER, REX (LE) Secondary Owner STOCKER, JULIE A (TRS) Map ID: 32 Mailing Address 1409581ST AVE SEBASTIAN FL 32958 Legal ERCILDOUNE HEIGHTS SUB NO 2 BLK K LOT 4 PBI 4-5 Site Address 14095 81ST AV Revision Date: 4/8/2021 Page 49 214 w'•R,; INDIAN RIVER COUNTY- DEPARTMENT OF UTILITY SERVICES NORTH COUNTY WATER / SEWER PROJECT S2S PHASE 2 - WATER ASSESSMENT PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL- RESOLUTION 3 Exhibit A Parcel# 30382500002011000005.0 Assessment= $2,247.76 Owner HALCOMB, GEORGE M (TR) Secondary Owner Map ID: 33 Mailing Address PO BOX 790 VERSAILLES IN 47042 Legal ERCILDOUNE HEIGHTS SUB NO 2 BLK K LOT 5 PB14-5 Site Address 14055815TAV Revision Date: 4/8/2021 Parcel# 30382500002011000006.0 Assessment= $2,247.76 Owner UHLHORN, IVANKA Secondary Owner Map ID: 34 Mailing Address 14025 81ST AVE SEBASTIAN FL 32958 Legal ERCILDOUNE HEIGHTS SUB NO 2 BLK K LOT 6 PBI 4-5 Site Address 14025 81ST AV Revision Date: 4/8/2021 Parcel # 30382500009000100001.0 Assessment= $2,247.76 Owner BERNI, STEPHEN & MAROLYN C Secondary Owner Map ID: 35 Mailing Address 13990 RUFFNER LN SEBASTIAN FL 32958 Legal RIVER TREES BLK A LOT 1 & 1/13 INT IN TRACT A PBI 9-24 Site Address 13990 RUFFNER LN Revision Date: 4/8/2021 Page 50 215 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY - DEPARTMENT OF UTILITY SERVICES c.8, NORTH COUNTY WATER / SEWER PROJECT S2S PHASE 2 - WATER ASSESSMENTPRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL- RESOLUTION 3 Exhibit A Parcel# 30382S00009000100002.0 Assessment= $2,247.76 Owner SIMON, ANDREW & ALICE Secondary Owner Map ID., 36 Mailing Address 13920 RUFFNER LN SEBASTIAN FL 32958 Legal RIVER TREES BLK A LOT 2 & 1/13 INT IN TRACT A PBI 9-24 Site Address 13920 RUFFNER LN Revision Date: 4/8/2021 Parcel# 30382500009000100003.0 I Assessment= $2,247.76 Owner FIELDS, DOUGLAS I Secondary Owner FIELDS, DEBORAH H Map ID: 37 Mailing Address 13890 RUFFNER LANE SEBASTIAN FL 32958 Legal RIVER TREES BLK A LOT 3 & 1/13 INT IN TRACT A PBI 9-24 Site Address 13890 RUFFNER LN Revision Date: 4/8/2021 Parcel# 30382500009000100004.0 Assessment= $2,247.76 Owner JOHNSTON, KEVIN R & SUANNE 1 Secondary Owner Map ID: 38 Mailing Address 13860 RUFFNER LANE SEBASTIAN FL 32958 Legal RIVER TREES BLK A LOT 4 & 1/13 INT IN TRACT A PBI 9-24 Site Address 13860 RUFFNER LN Revision Date: 4/8/2021 Page 51 216 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY - DEPARTMENT OF UTILITY SERVICES NORTH COUNTY WATER / SEWER PROJECT S2S PHASE 2 - WATER ASSESSMENT PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL- RESOLUTION 3 Exhibit A Parcel 30382500009000100005.0 1 Assessment= $2,247.76 Owner STEWART, JOHN LADD & CHRISTINE CHILDERS I Secondary Owner 1 I I Map ID: 39 Mailing Address 13820 RUFFNER LN I SEBASTIAN FL 32958 1 Legal RIVER TREES BLK A LOT 5 & 1/13 INT IN TRACT A PBI 9-14 1 I I I Site Address 13820 RUFFNER LN I Revision Date: 4/8/2021 Parcel# 30382500009000100006.0 I Assessment= $2,247.76 Owner PYLE, CATHY ERGLE 1 Secondary Owner I I I Ma ID: Mailing Address 13790 RUFFNER LN i �40 SEBASTIAN FL 32958 1 Legal RIVER TREES PBI 9 - 24 BLK A LOT 6 AND A 1/13 INTEREST IN POR OF TR A AND ALSO INC FOLL DESC PARC SEC 25 TWN 30 RNG 38 GOVT LOT 2 FROM THE SW COR OF GOV LOT 2 RUN N AL THE W LINE OF I GOV LOT 2 A DIST OF 617.80 FT TH N35 -10-00E 1295.37 FTTH 535-12-OOE A DIST OF 754.45 FT TH N40 -27-45E A DIST OF 77.29 FT TH 538-22-34E A DIST OF 201.57 FT TH N41 -37-26E A DIST OF 321.42 FT MORE OR LESS TO W SHORE OF IND RIV AND POB TH RETRACING LAST MENTIONED COURSE RUN 541-37-26W A DIST OF 321.42 FT MORE OF LESS TH RUN 540-24-57W A DIST OF 88.59 FT TH 542-54-44E A DIST OF 198.66 FT TH N41 -43-23E 409.36 FT MORE OR LESS TO THE W SHORE OF IND RIV TH NWLY MEANDERING SAID W SHORE TO POB LESS 30 FT ROW FOR OLD US HWY NO 1 (NOW RIVER RD) AL THE NELY PORTION OF SAID PARCEL I I Site Address 13790 RUFFNER LN I Revision Date: 4/8/2021 Parcel# 30382500009000100007.0 Assessment= $2,247.76 Owner GLOVER, TIMOTHY C I Secondary Owner I Map ID: 41 Mailing Address 9446 FLEMING GRANT RD I MICCO FL 32976 1 Legal RIVER TREES BLK A LOT 7 & 1/13 INT IN TRACT A PBI 9-24 1 1 I i I Site Address 13700 RUFFNER LN Revision Date: 4/8/2021 Page 52 217 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY — DEPARTMENTOFUTILITYSERVICES r NORTH COUNTY WATER / SEWER PROJECT S2S PHASE 2 — WATER ASSESSMENT PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL— RESOLUTION 3 Exhibit A Parcel# 30382500009000200002.0 Assessment= $2,247.76 Owner SCARAVAGLIONE, DAVID (H) Secondary Owner Map ID: 42 Mailing Address PO BOX 120340 MELBOURNE FL 32940 Legal RIVER TREES BLK B LOT2 & 11131NT IN TRACT A PBI 9-24 Site Address 13925 RUFFNER LN Revision Date: 4/8/2021 Parcel# 30382500009000200003.0 Assessment= $2,247.76 Owner KEY, COLLEEN CAROL ' Secondary Owner ROBERTSON, GORDON ALAN 1 I J Map ID: 43 Mailing Address 13895 RUFFNER LN I SEBASTIAN FL 32958 1 Legal RIVER TREES BLK B LOT 3 & 1/13 INT IN TRACT A PBI 9-24 1 I Site Address 13895 RUFFNER LN Revision Date: 4/8/2021 Parcel# 30382500009000200004.0 Assessment= $2,247.76 Owner MALIN, MICHAEL & BARBARA B Secondary Owner Map ID: 44 Mailing Address 13825 RUFFNER LN SEBASTIAN FL 32958 Legal RIVER TREES BLK B LOT 4 & 1/13 INT IN TRACT A PBI 9-24 Site Address 13825 RUFFNER LN Revision Date: 4/8/2021 LM Page 53 218 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY - DEPARTMENT OF UTILITY SERVICES NORTH COUNTY WATER / SEWER PROJECT S2S PHASE 2 - WATER ASSESSMENT PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL- RESOLUTION 3 Exhibit A+ Parcel 30382500009000200005.0 Assessment= $2,247.76 Owner ROLOFF, LLOYD Secondary Owner Mop ID: 45 Mailing Address PO BOX 781302 SEBASTIAN FL 32978 Legal RIVER TREES BLK B LOTS & 1/13 INT IN TRACTA PBI 9-24 Site Address 13795 RUFFNER LN Revision Date: 4/8/2021 Parcel # 30382500009000200006.0 1 Assessment= $2,247.76 Owner ROSIER, MARIE D Secondary Owner Map ID: 46 Mailing Address 13725 RUFFNER LN SEBASTIAN FL 32958 Legal RIVER TREES BILK B LOT 6 & 1/13 INT IN TRACT A PBI 9-24 Site Address 13725 RUFFNER LN Revision Date: 4/8/2021 Parcel # Assessment= Owner Secondary Owner Map ID: Mailing Address Legal Site Address Revision Date: Page 54 219 o z 1 � o r-+ r c ftft Lnr (D�. p cu � C CD Ul) N NJ Ai NJ n rIj N rDC m r+ 2A T, 00o e 0 00 � 0�0 O000ao � oa � 0 p4 04 n44Q aoe o0on a nO�A 1 o t. N CD G NJ ti w S C W, T CL JO T CL+ (DD N j e-+ O o �v O N < ��+ cD i 0' O o N fD 0►q ' � �. O 0 'a O r+ e r+ O. QLn Q r D (D N D a z .I� w N V N NN D W O Ul W � � O O M O O W C W h O I--� C1 �I O 00 r+ Q1 l� O �l W W, T CL fD cu rD t rD O y;� -n r- = -0 (3) -0� � rD -0N rD O CD 3 r+ = T -� o o (-D 7N CD o 3 3 -vo m_ 3 rD X O- O co CL C n N O f4 cn 00 Cu O rD fD O rt O N < O � T CU -n T O 0 O �, :3 O n rD Ln n rD O � Ln L r rD 3 i r ,/A - -Liq - 5 0 (D T (D D W v N m x N ' (D + Un0 c a = _. Uup m , C(D %. 0 N 10'1'1 UQ - N N Q � OrQ O m a' w r) l0 L Q' O un .-% 'O N � O O -O (D r+ (D rD cn 4W. t/} i/-). 4j)- 4/4 U1 I� W lC N W (!1N N N> O N N p1 O O �O O W 00 w 00 p O= �D01 l0 l0 O O �I O 00 O P+ O Op 6 VN7 L0 v w ,/A - -Liq - 5 0 n m n fA 4�j ai9-t, D rt r) r r+ (D o (D N r+ (7 A _ r+ (D Ot (DD �� 06) � Q � (D N (D m -- 'r �I I m O N W N O OLn O -t A 0 n m n fA 4�j ai9-t, � N N 0 NJ w m CA f+ (D CL 'pq";m - I D D L - O N NLA 3 m CA f+ (D CL 'pq";m - I r1 L•� �r �J m 3 m rm+ rn N CD � is C Can m O O m a � (oo�1� O NAL ry wSa O ao _aOwy�� .�CC ro w Cs O O m tl' Q a N d (V -� T Z O 95 -i FL w N O c nii N n211 `c n Ka �p�N� N Q NR C Ln a w (D O � �• N o D a m o N proj t@D, p a � a '� 3 � N• � N m 3 o a w z n g t7 d rm 3��7tp croi. d^m 4 m �p 3 Z _ ro d d ? ac ba ro o 5 c �. $ro fy m D y t m � �p SK pl l�C d 40i an ro ro >1 @' AO. o p O 0 c i M � � �w�3a c0 C f4 N d d $ L1" I p G c aro :3 m �R ~ w 3 n� ns 2 nFL +�aa3 � �.ro� �O 3 (Dcmn ?oa M 0. � o oa9aa roto (an .6 a a n o f i i 1. i a 1 r1 L•� �r �J m 3 m rm+ rn U m Ln CL � rb �* v I CD ;o � -0 g QQ� Z3 ul (D N� a rD I rn orb�or°o3 O CD A o r+ CL �Co D O p' CL lb CL 0 O!! O a �• Q � � cn n 0 0 (A o N rh a � o ro rij 0 0 N a N N � C. cx rb rro U1 (�j-1 O O p ro o w � A S • Q0p -p Ln CD (D CD 0 3 Ul cu LnN 0 p > � N N CMD K O r—+. N < � N • C7 O C7 (D r �' =3 r-+ - 0� C7 O O 0 O 3 O 3 Z 3 n Ln LA n O (D 3 r' rn f�A • B al -p Ln (D live 0 CT O (D O a N N C7 (D r r=r - C7 0� 0 O Z n O (D 3 r' rn f�A B (� l J • ul 3 • < CD O CD O ` G)N � 3 O O CD n O fD r+ �' �I cD �• � 0O (D _0 r-+ N =3 O---'h (D �. CD -n fD �D =3 0 -• OO • C:- OrU CD � 0. m (D 0� � O O � CD n r•f• r.f. • _0 �G r+ r -r O �• � CD � O r+ n CD c 3 CD � cin (U Ln Ln 3 T m m CL Wo • un V1 O ` G)N � 3 O � CD cD �• � _0 r-+ m .0 [ 3 0 -• '< CD 0. m C Z O � � � r•f• r.f. UQ � r -r i n �• CD � r+ n c CD � cin (U Ln T m m CL n � (D O < r+ CD (D CD rCLn t- O_ _• c - r+ e-+ � O• �Ln 3 CD rte+ m m A O 3 3 m cu O. O ' o = O fD CD -� to O O -� o- 5 3 r+ �D r+ r* S Q. O -p r+ O _. O �' n 3 �• O O -• O O -h r+ CD O CD n r+ m m A O 3 3 m cu O. O �l N r+ 50 r.d Tq -�q - 13 Indian River Press Journal 1801 U.S. 1, Vero Beach, FL 32960 AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION INDIAN RIVER COUNTY ATTORNEYS OFFIC 1801 27TH ST VERO BEACH, FL 32960-3388 STATE OF WISCONSIN COUNTY OF BROWN Before the_ undersigned author, p0r ovally_ rap,peared,,,.said legal clerk, who on oath says that he/she is a legal clerk of the Indian River Press Journal, a daily newspaper published at Vero Beach in Indian River County, Florida: that the attached copy of advertisement was published in the Indian River Press Journal in the following issues below. Affiant further says that the said Indian River Press Journal is a newspaper published in Vero Beach in said Indian River County, Florida, and that said newspaper has heretofore been continuously published in said Indian River County, Florida, daily and distributed in Indian River County, Florida, for a period of one year next preceding the first publication of the attached copy of advertisement; and affiant further says that she has neither paid or promised any person, firm or corporation any discount, rebate, commission or refund for the purpose of securing this advertisement for publication in the said newspaper. The Indian River Press Journal has been entered as Periodical Matter at the Post Offices in Vero Beach, Indian River County, Florida and has been for a period of one year next preceding the first publication of the attached copy of advertisement. . 04/06/2021, 04/13/2021 Subscribed and sw r o before on April 13;,2021: Notary, State of WI, County of Brown TARA MQNDL_OCH Notary Public State of VVisconsin My commission expires August 6, 2021 Publication Cost: $287.28 Ad No:0004655026 Customer No: 1310775 PO #: Roseland # of Affidavits la..: _. . IEC 3 < ;ate APR � � 2021 r_0UN o ATTORNEY'S NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ON PROPOSED SPECIAL ASSESSMENT NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Board of County Commis- sioners of Indian River County, Florida, will conduct a Public Hearing to consider approving a special assessment project in connection with a water main extension in the area of Rose- land to include certain special- ly benefited properties within River Trees, Ercildoune Heigghts Subdivision No. 1, Ercildoune Heights Subdivi- sion No. 2, Plat of Wauregan on Fleming Grant and the Townsite Plat of Roseland, Florida, located within unin- corporated Indian River Coun- ty, Florida. The Public Hearing will be held on Tuesday, April 20, 2021 at 9:05 a.m., or as soon thereafter as the matter may be heard, in the County Com- mission Chambers located on the first floor`of Building A of the County Administrative Complex, 1801 27th Street, Vero Beach, Florida 32960, at which time interested parties may be heard with respect to the proposed project and as- sessment. Any proposed documents, in the description of each property to be assessed and the amount to be as- sessed to each property, may be ascertained by the public during regular business hours (8:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m., Mon- day through Friday) at either the Office of the Clerk to the Board of County Commission- ers, located on the second floor of Building A of the County Administrative Com- plex, 1801 27th Street, Vero Beach, Florida or the Depart- ment of Utility Services, locat- ed on the first floor of Build- ing A of the County Adminis- trative Complex. Anyone who may wish to ap- peal any decisionwhich may be made at this meeting will need to ensure that a verba- tim record of the proceedings is made, which includes testi- mony and evidence upon which the appeal is based. Anyone who needs a special accommodation for this meet- ing must contact the County's Americans With Disabilities Act (ADA) Coordinator at 772- 226-1223 at least 48 hours in advance of the meeting. INDIAN RIVER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS JOSEPH E. FLESCHER, CHAIR- MAN Publish: April 6, 13, 2021 TCN4655026 Tq � )� q. IS- Prepared by and return to: Office of Indian River County Attorney 1801 271" Street Vero Beach, FL 32960 772-226-1425 Part of Parcel ID. No. TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT This TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT, made and executed this day of 2021, by whose mailing address is hereinafter called GRANTOR to Indian River County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida; whose address is 1801 27th Street, Vero Beach, Florida 32960-3388, hereinafter called GRANTEE.. Whenever used herein, the terms GRANTOR and GRANTEE include all parties to this instrument and their heirs, legal representatives, successors and assigns. _ WITNESSETH: That GRANTOR, for and in consideration of the sum of ONE DOLLAR and other consideration, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, does hereby grant unto the GRANTEE a TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT on, over, across, and beneath the following described land, situate in Indian River County, Florida, to -wit: Legal Description: Insert Legal Description or See Attached Exhibit A. This easement is for the purpose of abandoning an existing private Onsite Sewage Treatment and Disposal System (OSTDS) and domestic self -supply connection from a well and installing and connecting waste water to centralized sewer system and centralized potable water to the existing structure, including all work incidental to performing such activities. This easement shall expire after the abandonment of the OSTDS and connection to centralized water and sewer system are completed and the utility account for the property is activated. �1 220 IN WITNESS WHEREOF the GRANTOR has herein set his hands and seals the day and year first above written. Signed, sealed and delivered in the presence of: signature: printed name: signature: printed name: [individual form] STATE OF COUNTY OF M The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me, by means of presence or ❑ online notarization, this day of , 2021 by who is ❑ personally known or ❑ produced identification in the NOTARIAL SEAL: [corporate form] STATE OF _ COUNTY OF NOTARY PUBLIC printed name: Commission No.: Commission expiration: ❑ physical form of The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me, by means of ❑ physical presence or ❑ online notarization, this day of , 2021 by , the of , a (state) corporation, on behalf of the corporation, who is ❑ personally known or ❑ produced identification in the form of NOTARY PUBLIC printed name: NOTARIAL SEAL: Commission No.: Commission expiration: 2 221 RESOLUTION NO. 2021- A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, FORMALLY ACCEPTING AN EASEMENT FOR UTILITY PURPOSES ONLY, OVER, ACROSS AND UNDER THE PRIVATE ROAD RIGHT -OF' -WAY AND ADJACENT PLATTED 10' EASEMENTS ABUTTING THE PRIVATE ROAD OF RUFFNER LANE IN THE RIVER TREES SUBDIVISION WITHIN UNINCORPORATED INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA. WHEREAS, by Confirming Resolution No. 2021- , the Board of County Commissioners approved a special assessment project for a water main extension and sewer main extension (the "utilities") to be constructed from Bay Street along Ruffner Lane within River Trees Subdivision; and WHEREAS, the utilities are to be constructed within the private roadway labeled as Ruffner Lane on the plat of River Trees Subdivision; and WHEREAS, in order for Indian River County to construct and maintain the utilities within the private roadway, it is necessary for Indian River County to have an easement within the private roadway; and WHEREAS, the plat of River Trees Subdivision, recorded in Plat Book 9, Page 24, has specific dedication language that all streets and easements are for the use of the property owners in the subdivision, with the full knowledge that the same are not dedicated to the public until there is a formal acceptance of these streets and/or easements, or any part thereof, by the County; and 1 222 Attachment 3 RESOLUTION NO. 2021 - WHEREAS, it is the desire of the Board of County Commissioners to only formally accept an easement for utility purposes over, across and under Ruffner Lane and the adjacent platted 10' easements within River Trees Subdivision, and it is not the intention of the Board of County Commissioners to accept the roadway as public, nor the maintenance of said roadway, NOW, THEREFORE, ,BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA that: 1. The Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida expressly and formally accepts an easement for utility purposes only, over, across and under the private roadway labeled as Ruffner Lane and the, adjacent platted 10' easements on the plat of River Trees Subdivision, as recorded in Plat Book 9, Page 24 of the Public Records of Indian River County, Florida. 2. The Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida does not accept the roadway as a public road nor the maintenance for the road. This resolution was moved for adoption by Commissioner , and the motion was seconded by Commissioner , and, upon being put to a vote, the vote was as follows: Chairman Joseph E. Flescher Vice Chairman Peter D. O'Bryan Commissioner Susan Adams Commissioner Laura Moss Commissioner Joe Earman 2 223 Attachment 3 The Chairman thereupon declared the resolution duly passed and adopted this 20th day of April, 2021. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA By_ ATTEST: Jeffrey R. Smith, Clerk of Court and Comptroller By: Deputy Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGAL SUFFICIENCY: By: Dylan Reingold County Attorney Joseph E. Flescher, Chairman 3 224 v PART'THE USA TODAY.�NE7WAOftK Indian River Press Journal 1801 U.S. 1, Vero Beach, FL32960 AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION INDIAN RIVER COUNTY PLANNING ; 1801 27TH STREET VERO BEACH, FL 32960 STATE OF WISCONSIN COUNTY OF BROWN Before the undersigned authority personally appeared, said legal clerk, who on oath says that he is a legal clerk of the Indian River Press Journal, a daily newspaper published at Vero Beach in Indian .River County, Florida: that the attached copy of advertisement was published in the Indian River Press Journal in the following issues below. Affiant ' further says that the said Indian River Press Journal ' is a newspaper published in Vero Beach in said '. Indian River County, Florida, and that said ; newspaper has heretofore been continuously published in said Indian River County, Florida, daily and distributed in Indian River County, Florida, for a period of one year next preceding the first publication of the attached copy of advertisement ; and affiant further says that she has neither paid or promised any person, firm or corporation any discount , rebate, commission or refund for the purpose of securing this advertisement for publication in the said newspaper. The Indian River Press Journal has been entered as Periodical Matter at the Post Offices in Vero Beach, Indian River County, Florida and has been for a period of one year next preceding the first publication of the attached copy of advertisement. 4/4/2021 J Subscribed and sworn to before on April 411), 2021 Notary, State of WI, County of Brown TARA MONDLOCH Notary Public State of Wisconsin My commission expires: August 6, 2021 Publication Cost: $2,109.60 Ad No: GC10614671 Customer No: 463755 PO#: PUBLIC NOTICE c RESOLUTION NO. 2021-2020 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, PROVIDING FOR A WATER MAIN EXTENSION TO SERVE 13700.13990 RUFFNER LANE WITHIN RIVER TREES; AND 14365 78TH AVENUE, 14355 AND 14370 80TH AVENUE WITHIN ERCILDOUNE HEIGHTS SUBDIVISION NO. 1; AND ALL PROPERTIES WITHIN ERCILDOUNE HEIGHTS SUBDIVISION NO. 2; AND ALL PROPERTIES LYING NORTHWEST OF BAY STREET (83RD AVENUE), ALL PHUPLH I IES Wl l Hill 8LUCKS 1, Z. 3 ANU 4; 82411 133H COUH I ANU 822b, 8245 AND 6255133RD PLACE WITHIN BLOCK 14, 8230, 8240 AND 8250 133RD PLACE, 8235, 8245 AND 8255134TH STREET WITHIN BLOCK 15, 8240134TH STREET, 134D0 82ND COURT, AND 8235 AND 8255135TH STREET WITHIN BLOCK 16, OF THE PLAT OF WAUREGAN ON FLEMING GRANT; AND ALL PROPERTIES WITHIN BLOCKS 0-1 (LESS RIGHT-OF-WAY), B-2, B-3 AND B-4 (RIVER FRONT), ALL PROPERTIES WITHIN BLOCK 8-2 (RAILROAD FRONT), ALL PROPERTIES WITHIN BLOCKS 1, 2 AND 3, AND 12805 AND 12835 82ND COURT WITHIN BLOCK S. AND 12820 AND 12846 82ND COURT WITHIN BLOCK 6, AND 12920 AND 12940 82ND COURT WITHIN BLACK 8, AND 12948 AND 12960 82ND COURT WITHIN BLOCK 9, AND 12970 AND 12980 R2ND COURT WITHIN BLOCK 10, OF THE TOWNSITE PLAT OF ROSELAND, FLORIDA, LOCATED WITHIN UNINCORPORATED INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA; PROVIDING THE TOTAL ESTIMATED COST, METHOD OF PAYMENT OF ASSESSMENTS, NUMBER OF ANNUAL INSTALLMENTS, AND DESCRIPTION OF THE AREA TO BE SERVED. WHERFA.S, the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River Countyhas determined that the improvements herein described are necessary to promote the pull is wellare of the county and has delermined lodefmy the cost thereof by special assessments against certain specialty benefited properties to be serviced by a wader main extension benefiting 13700.13990 Ruffner Lane within River Trees, and 14365 78th Avenue.14355 and 14370 60th Avenue within Ercildmme Heights Subdivision No, I: and all properties within Ercfldoune Heights Subdivision No. 2: and all properties lying northwest of Day Street (83rd Avenue),ail properties within Blocks 1, 2.3 and 4: 8240 1331d Court and 8225, 6245 and 8255133rd Place within Block 14, 8230, 8240 and 8250 133rd Place, 8235, 8245 and 8255 134th Street within Block 15,8240 134th Street. 13400 82nd Court and 8235 and 6255 135th Street within Block 16, of the Plat of Waurc9an on Fleming Grand: and all properties within Blocks D-1 gess right-of-way), B-2,8-3 and B-4 (river front), all properties within Block B-2 (railroad front), all properties within Blocks 1, 2 and 3, and 12805 and 12835 82nd Court vviilhin Block 5. and 12820 and 12846 82nd Court within Block G, and 12920 and 12940 B2nd Court within Block 8, and 12948 and 12960 82nd Court within Block 9. and 12970 and 12980 82nd Court within Block 10. of )the Tovnsite Plat of Roseland. Florida, located within unincorporated Indian River County, Florida NOW, I HEREFORE. HE I RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY. FLORIDA, as follows: 1, The County does hereby determine Thal a water main shall be extended to serve 13700-13990 Ruffner Lane within River Trees; and 14365 7 811h Averfue,14355 and 14370 801h Avenue within E(cildoune Heights Subdivision No. I; and all properties within Ercildoune Heights Subdivision No. 2: and all properties lying northwest of Ray Street (83rd Avenue), an properties within Blocks 1, 2,3 and 4; 8240133rd Court and 0225, 8245 and 8255133rd Place within Block 14, 8230, 8240 and 8250133rd Place. 8235, 8245 and 8255134th Street within Block 15,8240 134th Street, 13400 82nd Court, and 8235 and 8255135th Street within Block 16. of the Plat of Wauregan on Fleming Grant; and all properties within Blocks 0-1 fless right-of-way), 0-2, 8-3 and B-4 (river front), all properties wilhin Block B-2 (railroad Conti, all properties within Blocks 1 2 and 3, and 12805 and 12835 B2nd Court within Block 5, and 12820 and 12846 82nd Court within Block 6, and 12920 and 12940 82nd Cowl vdlhin Black B. and 12948 and 12960 82nd Court within Block 9, and 12970 and 12900 02nd Court within Block 10, of the Townsite Plat of Roseland, Florida. located within unincorporated Indian River County, Florida, to specially benefit 161 parcels ('Improvements'), and that the cost thereof shall be specialty assessed in accordance vdth the provisions of Sections 206,01 through 206.09 of The Code of Indian River County. 2. As access to water provides an equal benefit to each property served, the assessment will be equal per parcel. 3. The estimated cost for the Improvements is $361,990.00 or $2,247,76 per parcel to be paid by Me properties specially benefited as shown on the assessment pial on file with the Department of Utility Services and the Clerk to the Board. Assessments are to be levied against certain lots and lands adjoining and contiguous or bounding and abulling upon the Improvements or specially benefited thereby and further designated by the assessment plat wilh respect to the special assessments, 4, A special assessment In the amount of 52,247.76 per parcel may be assessed against each of the specially benefited properties designated on the assessment plat on file with the Clerk to the Board,This special assessment may be raised or lowered by action of the Board of County Commissioners serving as the equalizing board at the public hearing, as set forth in Section 206,07 of The Code of Indian River County. 5, The special assessments shall be due and payable and may be paid In full within 90 days after the date of the as -built resolution of the Board with respect to credits against the special assessments after completion of me Improvements (the "Credit Date") without interest, It not paid in full, the special assessments may be paid to len (10) equal yearly installments of principal plus inlefest. If not paid when due, there shall be added a penalty of 1-1/2% of the principal not paid when due, The unpaid balance of the special assessments shall bear interest until paid at a rate to be determined by the Board of County Commissioners when the Improvements are completed, 6, There is presently on file with the Department of Utnity Services and the Clerk to the Board an assessment plat showing (he area to be assessed, plans and specifications for the Improvements and an estimate of the cost of the proposed Improvements. All of these are open to inspection by the public at (he Department of Utility Services and the clerk to the Board,. 7. A proposed preliminary assessment roll with respect to the special assessments is on file with the Department of Utility Services and the Clerk to the Board. B -Upon the adoption of this resolution the Department of Utility Services shall cause this resolution (along with a map showing the areas to be served) to be published at least one time in life Indian River Press Journal before the public hearing as required by Section 206.04 of The Code of Indian River County. The resolution was moved for adoption by Cornmissionef Moss, and the oration was seconded by Commissioner Adams and, upmi being put to a vote, the vote. vias as follows: Chairman Joseph E.Flescher AYE Vice Chairman Peter D. O'Bryan AYE Commissioner Susan Adams AYE Commissioner Joseph H. Earman AYE Commissioner Laura Mass AYE. The Chairman thereupon declared the resolution duly passed and adopted this 91h day of btareh, 2021, ATTEST: Jeffrey R. Smith, Clerk of BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Cnwt and Comptroller INDIAN RIVER COUNTY. FLORIDA By: Randi Waralow. Deputy Clerk By: Joseph E. Flcscher, Chairman Approved as to form and legal sufficiency: By: Dylmh Reingold,Cnunty Allnrney Vq azo )- INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA 17. E MEMORANDUM TO: Jason E. Brown, County Administrator FROM: Dan Russell, Information Technology Director SUBJECT: County Websites, Domains, and Internet -Based Services. DATE: April 12, 2021 County staff is seeking a board discussion and direction regarding County websites, domains, and internet-based services. County staff periodically reviews and updates the numerous websites and domains maintained for the County and various departments within the organization. In discussions with County staff, Commissioner Earman has expressed an interest in upgrading the County website(s). As part of this preliminary discussion, the Commissioner provided a list of other Florida County websites that might serve as a model for the features and aesthetic look -and -feel he desired to see in a new website for Indian River County. The Martin County website, martin.fl.us, was the Commissioner's top choice of those websites on the list. In an effort to harmonize the next website update with the Commission's expectations, staff is seeking further direction from the Board on the website development process going forward. Information Technology staff has reviewed a preliminary list of requirements and features desired, should the Board of County Commissioners vote to proceed with a project to upgrade the County website. It is anticipated that staff would present further detailed specifications for the Board's consideration as part of this process. 1. The website should establish an identity for Indian River County and openly promote our best attributes. 2. Each page should have a clear intention for the user while establishing a focal point where the most important information can be easily found. 3. Each page should consider the most common way visitors scan a website: starting from the top and left of the site. Subsequently, website features should be aligned on a grid layout with columns and sections that line-up, feel balanced and orderly, and overall result in an aesthetically -pleasing appearance. Information should be clean, simple, and non -confusing. 4. The IRC website should use a standardized color palette (five or fewer total colors) and a limited number of fonts (three or fewer). 5. Website imagery must be high-quality and professional in appearance. Overall tone of the imagery should match the standardized color palette. 6. Users must be able to intuitively navigate the website, and navigation techniques should be consistent between pages. 7. All Departments should have access to and control over the content they present to the user. The website should be easily accessible for editing so the Departments can keep their information current. 8. The website should load quickly (within 2-3 seconds) based on the performance capabilities of 225 the IRC server system, given that a user has "average" bandwidth at home and a mid -grade PC. 9. The website must be mobile -friendly. 10. Contact info for specific County employees and functions must be readily -accessible and include phone, email, and social media. There should be an easy-to-use contact form, a staff directory ("telephone book"), and a map function, and these should be present on every page. 11. The website should have a prominent, graphical calendar function displaying the current month and highlighting key meetings and happenings. 12. The home page will have an "I want to..." feature that logically and quickly takes the user to a page. that satisfies the intent of her/his visit. Reporting an issue must be particularly simple and straightforward. 13. The home page should offer residents an easy tool for identifying their County Commissioner. 14. External agencies should be linked, especially the other IRC constitutional offices and State of Florida agencies/departments. 15. County employees should be easily able to track which webpage features/information items are gaining the most public interest at any time. The most popular search results should be directly linked on the home page. 16. The County website should be prominent on Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, and other popular social media sites. Content Management System (CMS) Item 7 in the list above sets a requirement that all departments should have access to and control over the content they present to the user and the website should be easily accessible for editing so the Departments can keep their information current. In order to accomplish that requirement, the County website would have to be moved from static HTML pages, currently updated and managed by IT staff, to a database -driven Content Management System (CMS) to allow for department staff to make changes and updates to website content within each department (Content changes would be held for moderation and approved by IT staff to ensure ADA accessibility standards are applied.) A CMS system shares a group of template pages across the entire site, allow for uniformity of design elements, and the ability to make design changes across the entire site by changing the design style of the template pages. The actual content resides in a single database and is inserted into template pages. Single County Website Moving the County websites to a Content Management System (CMS) would require a single website domain name (a single website) to function as a CMS is intended. The County currently has 14 websites with different domain names spread across multiple departments. (See Attachment 1 — County Websites) New Domain Name If a consolidation to a single website and domain name was to occur due to a shift to CMS, it would be an opportune time to consider moving to a single domain designated for government -use -only (.gov) and to brand Indian River County in a way previously not achieved with the abbreviated domain ircgov.com. (See Attachment 2 — New County Domain) Web Services The County utilizes a number of 3rd party vendors and public web -facing products to conduct business with the public and internal staff. Most of these products would not change with an upgraded County website (See Attachment 3 — Web Services). However, a project to upgrade the County website could include new integrated online services such as a "report a pothole" feature or similar. 226 According to Martin County staff, their 2014 web project initial investment was $250K, with —$150K in annual maintenance (over five years, Martin County has spent close to $1 M on the website). Our costs will likely differ, however, this information provides a general indication of potential costs. Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners discuss the Indian River County websites, domains, and internet-based services to determine board interest in. (a.) an upgraded website project, (b.) consolidating websites and allowing for departmental staff updates of web content through a Content Management System (CMS), (c) a new County domain name, and (d.) any new web services not currently being offered. Based upon Board direction, staff would present a set of specifications and requirements for Board consideration at a later date. Attachment 1 — County Websites Attachment 2 — New County Domain Attachment 3 — Web Services 227 f t9 \ �s \ SO /k I ! » !£ § f 2a { . , \ Ln � E O r') t ■ / � ■ � ! a � § INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA Information Technology Department New Internet Domains for Indian River County The .gov Domain The .gov top-level domain (TLD) facilitates collaboration among government -to -government, government -to -business, and government -to -citizen entities. The TLD authorizes domain names for bona fide US -based government organizations, at the federal, state, and local levels..gov makes government services easy to identify on the internet. Indian River County has already branded "gov" in the current county domain name but a .gov domain would be a further positive step in ensuring an identity as, a government organization. Naming Convention Regulations for .gov Domains The naming conventions for .gov domains are regulated by Federal Policy (§102-173.55 - § 102- 173.60). (See details below) and would allow for a number of options for Indian River County. Naming conventions are described in depth in paragraphs 55 through 60 of the Federal Policy (§102- 173.55 - § 102-173.60). The rules for local -government domains are the following: (a) To register any second -level domain within dot-gov, County or. Parish governments must register the County's or Parish's name or abbreviation, the word "county" or "parish" (because many counties have the same name as cities within the same State), and a reference to the State in which the county or parish is located. However, the use of the State postal code should not be embedded within a single word in a way that obscures the postal code. (b) The preferred format for county or parish governments is to denote the State postal code after the county or parish, optionally separated by a dash. Examples of preferred domain names include— (1) Richmondcounty-ga.gov; (2) Pwc-county-va.gov; and (3) Countyofdorchestor-sc.gov. (c) If third -level domain naming is available from the State government, counties or parishes are encouraged to register for a domain name under a State's registered second -level (e.g., richmondcounty.ga.gov). City and county exception requests To qualify for an exception, you should meet at least one of.the following three criteria: 229 1. Unique: City and county names that are not duplicated by any other city, town, borough, village, or equivalent, elsewhere in the country at the time of issuance can be registered without needing a reference to the state name. This will be determined by using Census Bureau's National Places Gazetteer Files. 2. Well-known: Certain cities are so well-known that they may not require a state reference to clearly communicate location. The list of US "dateline cities" in the Associated Press Stylebook will be reviewed.. 3. Most populous: Census maintains population data for the United States. DotGov will allow the largest 30 cities' names to be registered without a state suffix. The authorization letter should provide your organization's. rationale for meriting an exception. Abbreviations are not authorized unless an exception is granted. DotGov will arbitrate all exceptions to naming convention policy. Ease of Use for residents, business, and visitors Staff recommends selecting a simple name with the least amount of punctuation. County staff verbally speaks the County domain name frequently on phone calls while sending people to the County website or giving email addresses so the spoken domain should be clear, concise, and limit punctuation to avoid potential misspellings and errors. For instance, it's easier to say and remember "Indian River County Florida Dot Gov" than it is to say and remember "Indian River hyphen County hyphen F L Dot Gov". The current County domain, ircgov.com, frequently gets confused with a .gov domain, leading to errors while contacting staff via email or accessing the website. Designating the organization as a government should be done within the TLD of .gov rather than within the name preceding it. Indian River County Exemption With a unique name like. Indian River, the County should qualify for exemption 1 (listed above) which would allow the County to drop the state designation. Miami Dade County was given an exemption to drop the state and county designation (miamidade.gov) and Indian River might also qualify for a similar exemption. Indian River County Branding In reviewing the federal policy and the other .gov domains issued for Florida, it is unclear if an exemption could be granted for the domain irc.gov. Regardless, it is staff's recommendation to take this opportunity to brand the name Indian River since the abbreviation irc does not provide any information about the organization to residents, visitors, or businesses. .gov Domain Name Options Here are options for .gov domains to consider, in order of most recommended for the reasons listed above: • indianriver.gov (with approved exemption for both co and fl) • indianrivercounty.gov (with approved exemption for fl) • Indianriverfl.gov, (with approved exemption for co) • Indianrivercountyfl.gov • indianrivercofl.gov • indianriver-co-fl.gov 230 • indianriver-fl.gov (with approved exemption for co) • indianrivercounty-fl.gov • countyofindianrive rfl.gov • countyofindianriver.gov (with approved exemption) .gov 3rd Level Domain (domain.fl.gov) Section (c) of the federal regulations for .gov specify that if third -level domain naming is available from. the State government, counties or parishes are encouraged to register for a domain name under a State's registered second -level (e.g., rich mondcounty.ga.gov). There are currently two Florida counties with 3rd level .gov domains, dixie.fl.gov and santarosa.fl.gov so'the option is available from the State government. However, adding more punctuation (an additional "dot") into the spoken domain could complicate the ease of use, as mentioned above. 3rd level ,gov domain options are: • Indianriver.fl.gov (with approved exemption for co) • Indianrivercounty.fl.gov • Indianriverco.fl.gov • indianriver-co.fl.gov • countyofindianriver.fl.gov The .us Domain Although not reserved for government use as .gov is, the .us domain is the internet country code top- level domain (TLD) for the United States. Registrants of .us domains must be U.S. citizens, residents, or organizations, or a foreign entity with a presence in the United States. There are several Florida Counties using .us domains. Options forms domains are: • indianrivercounty.us • indianriverfl.us • indianriver-fl.us • indianriver.us is not available 4th level .us Domain The US Department of Commerce (DoC) has specifically stated that no new 3rd level locality domain. .us domains can be delegated until further notice, I.E. indianriver.fl.us. In addition; the DoC has only allowed fourth level county domain names beginning with "co." Options for 4th level .us domains are: • co.indianriver.fl.us • co.indian-river.fl.us 231 Other Florida County Sites . ov state/county exem tiol I .us 4th level alachuacounty.us hamiltoncountyfl.com myokaloosa.com bakercount Lorg hardeecounty.net [o.okeechobee.fl.us aycountyfl.go , hendryfla.nef ocfl.net r.0fQr�g9unt, L o hernandocounty.us osceola.org revardfl. o i hlandsfl. o pbcgov.com broward.org hillsboroughcounty.org pascocountyfl.net calhouncountygov.com holmescount' laxom pinellascounty.org charlottecountyfl.com ksarrcounty .go , F;ffl. polk-county.net citrusbocc.com ersaircouqt A1.o Putnam-fl.com claXcounty2Lv.com lafa ettecoun lorida.org santarosaftgov_ ollie.rcoun= ., . o ex ec - u telfl.nad sc ov.net columbiacountyfla.coni leecov.com u o desotobocc.com onco rk fl. c s'cfl.us ixie.fl.go� levycounty.org �r>roo go coj.net libertybocc.com t rent '009 myescambia.com madisoncountyfl.com suwcounty.org flag lercounty.org mymanatee.org to lorcount gov.com franklincountyflorida.com marioncountyfl.org4l. - oI adsdeonQ , h co* martin.fl.us volusia.org gilchrist.fl.us i.amidade.gov mywakulla.com m glades.com ori ae Eo.walton.fl.us ulfco= n �- t�. nassaucountyfl.com wash ingtonfl.com 232 � IA 0 E N u o 0 N C oo v O O C • c c w v c $ 'e E o o " w a �' T C "° m- C u° , E o N v v w o _ U v r c W a v° N Z2 m E o _� o °� V v C 10 E w" vm u�'� °° crL a N V J L N E W C C ry C y C 7 L j c O. S2 6L ooru w • o o -o J C fQ i w V J = n u c= N E G! U> .• • o c b e C j n 3 E y L c v c w 0 C �+ 0 N > O N y V1 > o y R N N 7 y 7 7 { b H Z Y G a w U w ll O_ h w l7 E vi Y c h • • m c c = `a o m cIz Ij � m o r -6 d w Q m r y V o _ � C O E O t C I NSC .d. yC >ns > u < 3 3 m �a w N E M mm Y a _ ` a" V /C C V oz U 4 _ 00 d r0 f d I I i - 1 V I li • • Al 1 J L 1_ _ •� � m Y d S. V $'E m c 2 c v _00 �z " 4 8 U N W d' • S J • fn ro • D O • d Q N � � U) c W S - ---- ' F c E Z U' E -0 ' E , 4 • Om • • z � w 4— aJ p '• • U bA Q O Q v O 0 Vi rp � Q c ai b�0 (v C0 -0 • 4-1 p `� p -1 .c • O pO QJ .LA .. V 4-+ bA 0- � co a) c • N_ CO 'ate C 'p .■ O W C C: N � • • w p E cp > p a) • • JJ L : � 1 •� G rQ 4-1 ui > = C Cai p �n C -0 CO • O 0 c ce z L i.+ • a- W 0 aJ 0.0 a) Q a UwL 0 `c 3 3 c m ° o 3 o u c c E 0 �. a O 6 n a m °c o U " (D m F m m o ro o a o 10 0 a L i E€ o'ac$ P c w a c E 0 '0 mti rn� 0rnm (}a b a 6 0+ a Q cc o ^" •u a�•.•� X1=.11 L ,+a a N a a U V / m O• me V t� V I n 0 l< 0 E3 (D 0) (D rr =3 (D (D (D r) LA 0 0 ua o 0 _0 (D 3 w n 71 J*& I D=7 o.(DX(D� o (D (D a()NmrNr a°"S NCL) �3'c O rr (D rN-r �'* a cin n J• N' �' G 30 rt °='•tA J. O W N rt rt O N r - rt,? (D ? 'v -0 UnO _ (D. rr 'O tea. a�- Ln cn' O vi (D:a, 3 uo a n' ua N C N1. `� -; ° Q! =) (D N T� S31 O (D N (D 0. Oi `< n r+ �- �. rr (D ° V V . D /�� L J. �, 1: o � /1 J. C V r) (D --i � �`V r+ x°oma<�n O' 0" tea° `<� ao� -�° (=Dr �-+,°0-3 spa a p- 0-0- N IN N a' a a, J. a C � J. 'rt r+N CA N r.N.. J • c N _ N rr {. .�0-0 i'N �. . �� 'n rNt � = - ao� rn N ? 0 (DD ., -°p OO W � !� (D N �. (A." rt � S �� T�� r"+3 O(D ° n d N N =3 C n jJ -O (D rt O -t X N N 3 3 N _ N' oJ•� N �' O- `C � (D (D N • (D ri � � d D e -+N = C (D (D —o- N r+. a r'7 N (D 0 N i t 1� w N (D lD � � u�a N ' (D 00 rNy, C 3• a S O< 1(D D w r -r n (D O 3 rt rpt 0o 0 �1 0r+ (D N N C N �ID 0 O C �. a (D rtr o - (D S I- r rD rr rr r+ 0- c' r rD (D� •` C a i. lD r+cu ! S 0 rr -n0 -,— 0 -0 (D rt 1-1 r•+ ,O N(D°•-,3 �n (D (D a r) (D rr d 0— r+ (D (D -.M rn O-ua ca - (A N _0 (A rn �Ua r (i (D N r+ r+ 00(D-�+ N O 0 `< w LA rr (D (D to 0M0� a—tea dr* r* fv N N "0 O O N 0 r-+ 3 NFi•33 dam' N wrt0� rr (D O `G . 0ryrt S N�-r<0 r 0 � rr �(Drn Lv rt -0 0 t% O C. +�:��O rO-0�OCO N .a (D (D m N � 0 O rt d 0 � r* oW^< �S 3' (D Dn 0 'C O 0 ,rr rr+ o -o "a (D n 0 � E5' C rr �D ::3(D C w �CO'0.N o a -r �' S vaNO 0 rD (D rr C r* --- 01A rD -+,O Nrr0 OC ID !n. i =3 ^ a J � (D CDN �D n NtA H0 V) O= uo (DON rt (Dd -w rOrCD n :E m � � � 0 w=13 m 0 `D E' � iv tN N O--+%<. �'�ma (D r+ r+ (D w rt 0 ��C�. v+ O (D tA =(DNn O -� O 0 C aC=,� � n -0 ag 0-rn( 0CA rn� . rr+ n J Q.n O0O� 0 a3 Q N (D lD � � u�a N ' (D 00 rNy, C 3• a S O< 1(D D w r -r n (D O 3 rt rpt 0o 0 �1 0r+ (D N N C N �ID 0 O C �. a (D rtr o - (D S I- r rD rr rr r+ 0- c' r rD (D� •` C a i. lD r+cu ! S 0 rr -n0 -,— 0 -0 (D rt 1-1 r•+ ,O N(D°•-,3 �n (D (D a r) (D rr d 0— r+ (D (D -.M rn O-ua ca - (A N _0 (A rn �Ua r (i (D N r+ r+ 00(D-�+ N O 0 `< w LA rr (D (D to 0M0� a—tea dr* r* fv N N "0 O O N 0 r-+ 3 NFi•33 dam' N wrt0� rr (D O `G . 0ryrt S N�-r<0 r 0 � rr �(Drn Lv rt -0 0 t% O C. +�:��O rO-0�OCO N .a (D (D m N � 0 O rt d 0 � r* PO V rt 0a DDi C o =r_ (D -1 — N p C N =3rD N Q- ° 3 OJ ��1p a N ort Q N (D r+ r.r 0 � (D N H? n (D c� (D UQ (D 9-°a X- CDs =3 �3 uQ ;o — M Q r* r* ° c fD 0 (D * Q�' < (D N ID '� —n Q rr n N n A) u4 `� (1 3 cp fD N W < rt jw N Q C 0 w N rD m aw r+ ° r* Wa Q+ n N Q a N N SL Q 7 f"F vi• e -r Q (D L Ln (D N Q O. n Q n < o m H (D N Q " Q tA, rt Q =r Q 0 "0 < (� ill r+ (D (D — r* a) .�S 0 1 3 r+ N n 0 0 N � O • r -r N N? !1 r -r � O p C X, M C =r �D d C7 C r1 5 =r m =' < rt N C _ ? 3 r* 0-N n rr cr (D O rt O �• r•r G'N m 1p k O (D N =rw O Oo rtO Q -O-, (D O CO c („ r.C ( c a n Uo w =r <(p "p = 3 < NLA (D�., to p C 1 N =r N -0 �., -�, = 0 CD 3• rrt O o'a d O rr CA U4 3 Vf W CD O r. 3 7 rpt 3 rr�-r `G G 'O `< . 0N rt C Ua bO Co < '* ( un rrt Q v'�fo� �D0 =:CD �- �,n' s N CL� O rtc m m3 c -h 3 = 0 iw fir* u' -==r� 3 N � (JN4 c �• rt Q N r.q. s � r.��., a 'r.�rF°Fi��''•`�"�-.� . - � �1 1 � C71 •A W o -I 1 -I f1 . sv rn n -i (D cp CU, iC a C:N �' N. 3 e r "0 O _O Sy C �h OO (D, ^, (D Q) �� Ua N O on C 3 n �' (D Crd N. N O (D a rt O (D Q (D N Q c ' O (D. N "O (D (D r. O N UQ N -0N O�, �• 3 H C N = O N O ? rpt �- ((D 0 CTn o_ o o.rt'M (D O' (D (� ((DD LA N vo 1 3 rr (D UQ rr+ (D 7' rrua rt (D 0 1w 1 1 N 4 d 1 w... D N rt n N N N �o rt N.cu 0-°3 cra�(Acu rD O UQ (D Sv r, CD ua 30 rn rn (D N N O rrt N 3 rt O rD rt rrt (D 0 0 O O (D r -r rr UOQ o r+ ry N �M0W 3 3-o o N r+ o.� Uo N U"O CD OQ CD U = (D N (D c r+N v C: O w � n o n o 0 N 0-w r* 0-3 5) (D '0 O O O -° < crQ CO a (DN�,-1 n a� m -1 r+ ��aoo rn `< °" 3 <' L n N O it o rn(D 0 r+ N D Ua r+ N CU rr+ `. 3 N rD (D 0 UQ .� n rD t.+ (D rt r) rt5 rr =r V) r+ O O N %<. CD UO r-+ C r+ N Ul 3 d(D pro c D�aC: r-+ Dir-+= < 0,00 CIL 3� N 0- _ h UQ CD O O Q O 3 aa- c N O (D d W(DW =3 "S � N w rt cu = 3 rn ON r -r a � r+ o rt N O a O- r+ Sv CD -h N =r i•1 r+ 0 o n c rn 3 3aLV sv � rrt r*o o =3 �oC l'1 cOn 0- CD c - O rn < I rtn�o' N O N 0 �(D L rn r* N 0 =;-CD O (D N a o r-+ D UQ =3 c Nr+ ;' O rt CD r* (D (D N W M a r+ r+ o a r N CD Sv 3 -Z (D rn L -v a N �� o (DM c (D< N N ,;O�-7 v L/) �. (D =OMNI • O (D 0 o �. Uo N Q m0 UG �— c � r -r UoO C l 1 N N � rte-* (D .-- o- rr r -r 3 r -r m N o C vrti ,p N `j r -f rn ( V �. r) N N 3 = �• r+ r � V (D r--r �' N r.f. 7 -- � i -�-� ��' s a - v v v v CL Q m n c cin o 0 < ru .o 0 0- (D 0 X (D 0 0 -, n 0 Eu- a � Eu- m 0 tra c o 0 =r << w G -0 s o 0) a o M 0 3 (D r* � �. 3 o cr o o � -� n 0 W 0 Q Ln r -r C1 o O sv-D-;, UO (D uac3rt� o n rt. N (D N C1 r r `< O � n c O �•Qno 2D .�'N�a N O � •�.r N r* r -r r* m� - iv Q- vaort N C o ' o Ln N 0 < w uQ I o O O0 = -op o n = o e-+ rr rrt Nn p N — N = N n o (D CD �-oe-+a uo 3 Q r -r << o p rrt o �' ? ua Sv o �. o = cU N a3 Q� Q(D o ° r+ o �D r O N `G O r% W _. rr+ v 0 3 I— 1 Tq . -,r3v- /t .ON fD ua (D 0) < e -t- (D �-' aQL) 0,0 rn (D. Vf n rt O N m N � C n �- � r -r N =r (D n O fD C C O o rt O n c -� a cu c c n _0 --I 0 0� a: d N C: rO-h rr-t N D- N C o 3 N cr C N � r—t `- O � r -r C � d C (D r+ il► � `G a a � c o ao C �• N � N � r T � n• N T WN 3Q e ,. m, Y ' " 6�h m 9 %'• pj N;KEE n T WN 3Q e ,. m, Y � aim � 6�h m dyD P, ✓ Ln� " Ham g n FEfl, � mo..,-." aim, P, n - .' ^ Ln� " Ham g n FEfl, � mo..,-." aim, P, 0 0- LA 0 Q -0 0 0 m n m o 3 LA r* � N d � 3 :� m m < �• m m r+ n :�D c W() r+ N a Uc N r+ - 0 rt rt 0 N Ul n m o0 r+ l< r-+ � � N r+ � C: r* r* m W W R� 0- m C) N =3 -.-& sv r 0-0 < -I m 0 n < r+ m l< -1 m r* '1 r Vo I 0.9 0 .1• /N I N N .W.A • O �ql. �3vvs- G) � � r` LA o - \ \ z4- |§[ CL n } ( 0 \ } $ $ / \ ƒ 0 { rn }§ ow ] }\ rD / 0C). < \ k /3 } 7 00 \ \. -�' CD \ a)\ :3& c ' " f 7 / ...... 'D 0)m �. 7 m & 8� 7]/ § & a 2 < . \ / & E ` \M� f2-0 . ET =r >e ) . ,aw» :7§ ) \}j ` / \ / \\/ - § i \ CCL . � \Ln 2 k m : e ( 4-� - & 12, F'. !. DEPARTMENTAL MATTERS INDIAN RIVER COUNTY INTER -OFFICE MEMORANDUM OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET DATE: April 20, 2021 TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS THROUGH: Jason E. Brown, County Administrator FROM: Kristin Daniels, Director, Office of Management and Budget Cynthia Stanton, Risk Manager SUBJECT: Self -Insurance Funds and Direct Writing Insurers for Property and Casualty Insurance BACKGROUND: In preparation for the May 1, 2021 renewal, staff worked with Arthur J. Gallagher Risk Management Services, Inc. (AJG) to secure the most comprehensive, cost-efficient property and casualty insurance program for the County. The table below summarizes the lines of coverage, limits and renewal costs, followed by the variables impacting the 2021 renewal rates. There was a total overall increase of 10.99% for the Indian River County insurance renewal. Renewal Summary Policy Coverage Policy Limits Current Premium Renewal Premium Premium Increase Premium Change Property (Non -Utility) $165 Mil $579,247 $650,004 $70,757 12.22% Property (Utility) $60 Mil $1,231,397 $1,351,104 $119,707 9.72% Flood Multi $8,637 $8,637 $0 0.00% Equipment Breakdown $100 Mil $8,842 $9,827 $985 11.14% Terrorism Property Damage $10 Mil $11,686 $16,750 $5,064_ 43.33% NCBR PD & Liability $10 Mil $23,095 $24,950 $1,855 8.03% Inland Marine $20Mil/$2.5 Mil $76,528 $94,513 $17,985 23.50% Crime $1 Mil $5,005 $6,597 $1,592 31.81% Public Entity Excess Liability $2 Mil/$4Mil $161,000 $182,100 $21,100 13.11% Excess Workers Comp Statutory Max $198,202 $229,137 $30,935 15.61%. Cyber $1 Mil $24,301 $30,368 $6,067 24.97% Hull/P&I $1 Mil $7,390 $7,761 $371 5.02% Church Parking Lot Liability $1 Mil $1,790 $2,087 $297 16.59% Statutory AD&D $75,000 $6,192 $6,166 -$26 -0.42% AJG Brokers Fee $175,000 $175,000 $0 0.00 Total $2,518,312 $2,795,001 $276,689 F_10 -_99-/Z_ 235 ANALYSIS: Attached, please find the detailed Executive Summary prepared by Erica Connick, Account Executive, AJG. Several charts within the Executive Summary detail the various lines of coverage. Major highlights of the renewal are as follows: Property Program: This year the program was marketed to 36 markets to ensure the best possible options. Indian River County's property insurance renewal program is based on total insurable values of $295,252,980 and provides a program limit of $165 million with $40 million for Named Storm Coverage, $25 million each for Flood and Earthquake Aggregate Annually except $10 million for Special Flood Hazard Area. The policy deductible is $100,000 with a 5% Named Hurricane with a maximum per occurrence of $5 million. We have received rate increases between 8% and 14%. The final renewal premium is $1,351,104 which is a 9.72% rate increase. Below you will find the material changes for the renewal: 1. Remove $250,000 sublimit for Personal Property Outside the U.S.A 2. Communicable Disease Exclusions 3. Add an aggregate to the Mold sublimit of $2,000,000 4. Post Loss Assignment Exclusion — The insurance will not apply to any expenses submitted that the County assigned their rights or interests to the vendor used to make repairs as a result of a covered claim 5. Updated edition dates for Exclusions related to virus, bacteria and/or microorganism 2021 Utility Renewal Overview The County's renewal is based on a total insured value of $242,955,795. Star's renewal proposal is $650,004; a 12.22% rate increase, all other terms remain as expiring. Excess Workers Comp: This market continues to be limited in Florida for public entities that have Police and/or Fire exposures which are subject to the presumption laws. The County. payroll is $92,767,840 which represents a 4% increase over expiring. The retention remains as expiring, with a premium increase of $30,935 or 15.61%. Inland Marine: The program was marketed to fifteen markets and received various declinations from carriers refusing to quote stating they could not provide the requested coverage or compete with the current program. The last several years the Auto Physical Damage coverage has become more difficult to market as carriers are concerned with the high value and concentration of vehicles in any one location. This year the carrier reduced the Named Windstorm and Flood sublimits from $20,000,000 to $2,500,000 however all others perils (such as fire, collision, vandalism) remain the same with a $20,000,000 limit. The quoted premium for a $20,000,000 limit for Named Windstorm and Flood is $197,081 or a 161% premium increase. Staff recommends the $2,500,000 in Named Windstorm coverage since all vehicles over $100,000 in value are not parked in a known flood zone and are dispersed to different locations in the event of a hurricane. This coverage reflects a $17,985 or 23.5% increase over last year's premium. Crime: The program was marketed to several markets and received competitive quotes. In the last few years, the County suffered a Crime loss totaling :$288,220 which was handled by Hanover Insurance. This year Hanover has offered another three-year term renewal program with a $1,592 or 236 32% increase in premium which is less than the alternative quote received from Travelers with a 38% increase in premium. FUNDING: The County's property and casualty coverage is funded through the Self Insurance Fund (502). This is an Internal Service fund that is supported by charges to operational funds of the County. The current fiscal year's portion of the proposed premium will be funded from account number 50224613-034590 (Self Insurance Fund - Other Insurance). Since the insurance program renews mid- year and encompasses two fiscal years, an increase in. funding for the upcoming fiscal year will be necessary to fund the overall 10.99% in premium increases. Since the Self Insurance Fund is supported by all other departments, the premium costs are distributed across all County departments. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board approve the proposed renewal and authorize staff to bind coverage for May 1, 2021 through April 30, 2022 with a current annual premium of $2,795,001. The renewal premium is based upon the current schedule of values, coverage selections and includes the annual broker fee of $175,000.00. ATTACHMENT: AJG Executive Summary 237 Indian River County Board of County Commissioners Gallagher *O CORE 360' Executive Summary Arthur J. Gallagher Risk Management Services, Inc. appreciates the opportunity to present this proposal for your consideration. We are very pleased to present Indian River County BOCC with a comprehensive property and casualty insurance proposal effective May 1, 2021 – May 1, 2022. This executive summary provides a high-level overview of our renewal accomplishments and alternatives for consideration. It is broken into the following components: • Marketplace Analysis – current insurance industry conditions • Property Program Analysis • Casualty Program Renewal MARKETPLACE ANALYSIS As we enter 2021, a number of compounding factors are driving the current insurance marketplace. First, there has been a substantial increase in the number of large weather-related loss events. Second, interest rates remain near historical lows, and third, the industry is dealing with an increasing loss trend in liability lines. Each of these factors help drive up prices and reduce coverage availability. Add to all these factors a global pandemic and a tightening in the reinsurance marketplace—the market is experiencing a high sense of uncertainty. This uncertainty is contributing to the feeling that this is a time where'the market has entered into a new phase of recalibration. Many would call this recalibration a hard market for certain lines of coverage and industries in the U.S. This hardening market is an underwriting -driven marketplace. In a traditional hard market, capital (and consequently capacity) is reduced, thereby limiting the availability of insurance. This marketplace is driven by the need for underwriters to make a profit from underwriting versus relying on investment income. Carriers remain intensely focused on underwriting discipline, ensuring they secure the right terms and pricing on certain lines of coverage that have historically not performed from an underwriting standpoint. The pace of the United States' economic recovery and the outcome of the active hurricane season could alter some of the underlying fundamentals of the current marketplace. However, in all likelihood, the conditions that exist today are not changing anytime soon, and it will take carriers some time re -underwriting their books of business to overcome the challenges associated with the current marketplace. Accordingly, all market indications point to a continuation of premium increases for the balance of the year and throughout 2021. Property Market The pace of change in the property marketplace continues to accelerate beyond most other lines of coverage. Loss trends have continued to outpace pricing models and, as a result, we have seen underwriters accelerate pricing increases especially over the last year." • Three of Gallagher's largest property carriers reported average rate increases of 22% on their national property book. • Due to rising loss trends and inadequate pricing, the national account property space (TIV > $125M) has been under distress for a large number of carriers. • The changes in coverage terms and conditions in the property marketplace have been significant. Increasing deductibles, shrinking sublimits—especially in catastrophic exposed geographies (CAT)—and carriers' conservative limit deployment can lead to less favorable terms and conditions for clients. • The rise in non -catastrophic (convective) storm losses continues to impact the industry. • Florida 2021 renewals – To date we have seen on average 5-20% rate increases on loss free accounts. Accounts that received an above average increase in 2020, have received a below average rate increase for 2021. Indian River County Board of County Commissioners V IN Gallagher 90 CORE 360' According to The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, the 2020 Atlantic hurricane season saw the highest number of named storms on record with 30 named storms in total. Hurricanes and typhoons are not the only weather-related events wreaking havoc on the market. In early August, the upper Midwest was impacted by a derecho weather event, which brought straight-line wind speeds in excess of 100 mph to portions of Illinois, Iowa, Minnesota and Wisconsin. There were numerous reports of widespread damage, especially across Iowa. In addition, ongoing wildfires impacted California, Washington and Oregon. On top of that insurer could suffer record first-quarter catastrophe losses after the historic winter storm in Texas. All in, the industry continues to experience significant catastrophic losses. Workers' Compensation Overall, workers' compensation rates increased slightly from prior quarters, which is noted in other public sources of information, including CIAB (+1.5%). We predicted that reduced exposures, negative rates and lower-than-expected claim frequency would lead to reduced premiums for insureds, and a better-than-expected combined ratio for carriers. • Multiple carriers noted positive rate increases on workers' compensation renewals in the second half of 2020. Reserve development trends are the driving force behind major changes in the workers' compensation marketplace, and they have remained favorable. As a result, we do not expect the workers' compensation marketplace to start behaving like the property or excess markets anytime soon; however, we believe we are at the beginning of a turning point in the workers' compensation marketplace. We think this turn will be more gradual—moving from its current state of slightly negative to slightly positive in the coming quarters. • Certain industries tied to the COVID-19 crisis, such as Construction, Healthcare, Food and Agriculture, etc., face an increased risk of exposure. • There are many scenarios and prognostications about COVID-19, and the possibility that presumption of compensability maybe extended to all employees could impact the workers' compensation industry. • More than 20 states have now proposed or enacted COVID-19-related workers' compensation bills. Casualty Market Primary General Liability, Law Enforcement and Errors & Omissions General liability loss costs continued to rise in the fourth quarter as the overall legal landscape continues to shift in the U.S. • The frequency of large judgments, increases in litigation financing and an empowered plaintiff bar continue to challenge the industry. • The median average verdict for the top 50 cases in the U.S. has doubled in the past four years.` • One area worth watching in the coming months is whether there is a liability exposure for companies failing to adequately follow and communicate public health guidelines. For example, a company not providing appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE). • Governments with poor loss experience may find it difficult to purchase expiring coverage limits at a reasonable price. • Many insureds that have had to cut limits while paying even higher premiums. • Sexual molestation and traumatic brain injury claims continue to be the hardest hit; limits are restricted, with higher limits almost unavailable at any price. Strong risk manaaement policies and nrocedures must hp in nlacP to nurchasP this coverage; your claims history wil • In addition to communicable disease misconduct (SAM), and traumatic bre Indian River County Board of County Commissioners Gallagher •••CORE360- • Law Enforcement markets pushing for 20% rate increases at a minimum based on current environment for police officers and police departments due to civil unrest Commercial Auto Liability Despite several years of price increases in commercial auto liability, rates continued to increase in the fourth quarter despite a drop in claim frequency due to the COVID-19 pandemic. • Loss costs are rising as new technologies make vehicles more expensive to repair. We expect carriers to continue to push rate increases across the board in commercial auto liability. Accordingly, we do not anticipate much change in the casualty environment in 2021. The fact of the matter is that rates still have a long way to catch up to loss -cost trends. General liability and commercial auto costs will continue to climb modestly, and the industry will keep a careful watch on the impact of COVID-19 on the workers' compensation marketplace. CYBER The Market Hardens • The cyber insurance market hit an inflection point in 2020. All signs indicate that we have moved from a long period of flat to falling cyber insurance premiums to a marketplace where underwriters are regularly seeking substantial rate increases for the public space. This trend cuts across most industry sectors. Cyber Claim Trends • The hardening cyber market has been driven mostly by an increase in frequency and severity of ransomware claims that manifested in 2019 and continue to occur in 2020. According to their 2020 Beazley Breach Briefing * Beazley reported a 131 % increase in ransomware attacks compared to the previous year. To make matters worse, reports of seven and eight figure ransom demands are becoming common. Many of these attacks targeted IT managed service providers which often allow criminals to impact hundreds of their customers downstream. • Cyber claim trends also were driven by significant social engineering attacks. In February the FBI released their 2019 Internet Crime Report ** revealing $3.5 billion in losses due to cyber -crime in 2019, with $1.7 billion directly attributed to Business Email Compromise attacks. Heightened Cyber Risk: COVID-19 and the Remote Workforce • With the sudden onset of COVID-19 in March, the majority of the global workforce was moved to remote locations in an effort to stop the spread of the Coronavirus. In doing so, it became apparent for many organizations that their staff may be operating in an environment that is inherently less secure that their normal office space. Questions were raised regarding insecure Wi-Fi networks, the usage of personal devices, video conferencing platforms potentially being open to cyberattacks, and whether or not the increased strain on IT networks could lead to business interruption losses. We have seen an increase in frequency in cyber claims directly attributed to employees working outside their normal environments. Several COVID-19 themed criminal phishing campaigns are being aimed directly at the remote workforce. In light of these circumstances, it would be prudent to review cyber polices to evaluate the scope of the policy coverage and how it may cover cyber losses related to the use of employee -owned devices and remote networks. Specific focus should be on how a policy might define "computer networks", "computer systems" and other key terms. In addition, policyholders should be aware that cyber claims costs for business interruption losses are almost always impacted by waiting periods before coverage will apply and limited to a specific period of restoration. In addition, while some policies expand coverage for system failure, coverage for these losses could be limited to outages stemming from only specific outsourced providers. Finally, if faced with a social engineering loss it is possible that lost funds may not be covered in the cyber policy and that other policies, such as crime policies, may apply. Review these polices carefully to see whether any portion of the loss may be covered. • SOURCE: Indian River County Board of County Commissioners 000 Gallagher oo* CORE 360- • * httgs://www.beazley.com/news/2020/beazley breach briefing 2020.html • ** httgs://pdf.ic3.gov/2019 IC3Report.odf Challenging Risk Profile Characteristics While the hardening market is not as severe as compared with the market of the early 2000s, pockets of the marketplace certainly resemble that of a traditional hard market. Due to the variability that we're seeing in this market and specific account characteristics, individual rates may vary from the ranges noted at the beginning of this report. Property Program Analysis Catastrophe Model Results Non -Utility Program In order to assist in selection of an appropriate named windstorm limit of insurance, we have included the windstorm catastrophe model. Full Total Insured Value Total Insured Value Utility Estimate Non -Utility Program 2020 Excluding Utilities 2021 0.10% 1,000 $ 79,836,524 $ 45,158,477 $ 34,678,047 742,301 387,152 i u,4uu,4na 2017 Property Overview In 2016 the County has submitted a claim for Hurricane Mathew which exceeded the 40% loss ratio the rate agreement was subject to. The claim was still in its early stages during renewal negotiations and the adjuster was still collecting data to properly value the claim and evaluating coverage. As a result, we approached your incumbent markets early and they all agreed to the rate agreement in place. We also negotiated to extend the flat rate agreement to 2018 renewal subject to the 40% loss ratio. However the rate agreement was not applicable to the 2018 renewal due to 2017 and 2018 losses. Historical Results The chart below shows the annual changes in limits, values, premiums, rates and named storm limit back to 2007. xposureremium :11Annual Rate emits NamedStorm IF 11 Purchased Limit 07-08 $342,013,377 $2,387,500 $0.701 150,000,0001 50,000,000 08-09 $414,241,37-3-' $1,950,350 - $0.47 '', 150,000,000 ' , 50,000,000 ; 4/1/09-5/1/10 $426,623,770 $1,412,500 $0.33 175,000,000 25,000,000 10-11 $301,589,497 � $1,350,000 $0.45 200,000000 50,000,000 11-12 $347,436,734 $1,049,302 $0.30 200,000,000 T. 50,000,000 12-13 $332,426,422 $1,316,000 $0.40 '; 200,000,000 25,000,000 - 13-14 $333,657,066 $1,264,537 $0.38 - 200,000,000 ' _ .._ _ .. 25,000,000 14-15 $342,345,764 $1,205,000 $0:35 ' 200,000 000 35,000,000 15-16 $343,203,562 $994,238 $0.29 200,000,000 35,000,000 7 - 1am�c Indian River County Board of County Commissioners 000 Gallagher OcP CORE 360' Exposure Premium Annual Rate Limits ame form Purchased Limit A!� A f111 LI1 AAA L/_�T ASA AAI AIS AIT AIT I V'II WJJL,VTJ,JJ( WJTJ,TTJ WV.LI LVV,VVV,VVV TV,VVV,VVV 17-18 $365,509,174 $984,710 $0.27 200,000,000 7 40,000,000 ; 18-19 $381,605,432 $1,221,289 $0.32 200,000,000 40,000,000 19-20 $372,933,092 $1,324,438 $0.36 200,000,000 40,000,000 20-21 $548,820,748 $1,876,307 $0.34 225,000,000 70,000,000 In 20-21 we recommended spitting the program into two towers (utility and non-utility), the above includes the combined results. Hurricane Mathew 8r, Irma Losses The County's renewal continues to be challenging due to the paid Mathew claim and the Irma claim. Below goes over the County's submitted claims in the last two policy years. Schedule Locations MUL - Beaches Property in the Open TOTAL 2020 Property Overview Mathew $2,009,443, IRMA Loss Claim Pa mentPa P=1 $3,171,072 $2,500,000 Maim ment* $- $1,371,986 1, $688,375 $2,009,443, $935,183 $13,129,0961 $2,500,000 $3,761,160 $2,500,000 $3,171,072 $2,500,000 $55,135 $- $17,672,153 $5,6881375 $5,825,738-" $3,435,183 Estimate Paid out Claims $9,123,558 Total Premium last 5 years $6,355,238 Loss Ratio for last 5 Years 144% The County's total insurable values for the 20-21 renewal increased from $381,605,432 to $548,820,748, a total increase of 47%. The increase was due to an appraisal the County completed in 2019. The appraisal allowed us to identify the County had enough Utility assets to carve out and approach Star Tech, an MGA that specializes in Utility programs. We offered several program options and the County decided to go with the two separate program towers: • Standalone Layered Program (Non -Utility Assets) with Star Tech (Utility Assets) o Total Premium excluding Fees $1,876,307, o Additional premium of $549,313 expiring, a 3.92% decrease in rate. Two major advantages gained by providing coverage for the Utility assets on a separate policy are a cost savings as well as an increase in the total overall limits and Named Storm limits available in catastrophic loss. The Starr Tech Utility program includes a $30,000,000 limit for Named Storm that is separate from the coverage provided on the non-utility assets, which will provides the County coverage levels on both programs which are in excess of a 500 year probable maximum loss. s Ga lagher Insurance Risk Management I Consulting Indian River County Board of County Commissioners 2021 Non -Utility Renewal Overview Non -Utility f00%-SI00M Xs of SOM Homeland tns. Co. of NY 300% -Sam X5 of$35A1__.—..- 25%- 55M P/O $IOM XS of $75M EvaMton 10% t0%10% Pnmary 11.1 Primary tronslare E.Kxgwxe - Lloyds 000 Gallagher Oo©CORE 360' NS 54M ou EQ & flood snm occ / A99 Each 15%Pn,wy ur AmAfscrOUX Pnmary 51`11A Flood (Va Ca M) 13erksh m SIoM OCC/A99 Non - Utility Deductibles All Peds 5100,000 Per Occurrence except Flood - Special Flood Hazard Area 5% of the vatue per uMt of urstrrwKe, minimum SIM000 and a maw SW Per AU0tlW Flood $200,000 Ammed Fhmkt -5%of the ratue per win of insurance, mimrn¢m 5100.000 and a max SSM Per oc K eme hesrrdloUon: S1O.000 Per Ocautrence ot", Deductibles A11PYrils $1OOA000 PM Oocivrence except Flood - Special Flood Hazard Area 5% of TN, minimum 5750.= Per Occurrence (execs of NFIP, whether purchased or Trot) Aft..d Windsttmn -5%of nV, mirdmum S1 OAM Per Oavrrence Utility scorn $60M All Parlls S30M NS SI5M 0SM $25M EQ Agg 10M Agg hood extept $FHA SIM ACE This year we fully marketed Indian River's property program to 36 markets to ensure the best possible outcome. Indian River County's property insurance renewal program is based on total insurable values of $295,252,980 and provides a program limit of $165 million with $40 million for Named Storm Coverage, $25 million each for Flood and Earthquake Aggregate Annually except $10 million for Special Flood Hazard Area. The policy deductible is $100,000 with a 5% Named Hurricane with a maximum per occurrence of $5 million. We have received rate increases between 8% and 14%. The final renewal premium is $1,351,104 which is an 8.74% rate increase. Below you will find the material changes for the renewal: 1. Remove $250,000 sublimit for Personal Property Outside the U.S.A 2. Communicable Disease Exclusions 3. Add an aggregate to the Mold sublimit of $2,000,000 4. Post Loss Assignment Exclusion — The insurance will not apply to any expenses submitted that the County assigned their rights or interests to the vendor used to make repairs as a result of a covered claim 5. Updated edition dates for Exclusions related to virus, bacteria and/or microorganism 2021 Utility Renewal Overview The County's renewal based on a total insured value of $242,955,795. Star has offered two options this year and we recommend you keep limits Der exoirina: Description 2021 — Option 1 (Expiring Limits) 2021 — Option 2 (Reduced Limits) Policy Limit — Any One Occurrence $60,000,000 $60,000,000 Earth Movement —Aggregate $25,000,000 $25,000,000 Flood (including storm surge) - Aggregate $10,000,000 $5,000,000 Special Flood Hazard Area — Aggregate $1,000,000 $1,000,000 Named Windstorm — Any One Occurrence $30,000,000 $10,000,000 Premium and Fees $650,004 $580,063 Difference from expiring $70,757 / 12.22% increase $816 increase / .14% N Nagher nagement I Consulting Indian River County Board of County Commissioners O00 Gallagher ooO CORE 360' Flood The Starr Tech Utility Property program includes $1,000,000 Aggregate in Special Flood Hazard Area (SFHA). The County Utility schedule has $34,330,128 in SFHA. Last year we recommended the County purchase NFIP blanket flood coverage for four specified buildings at South Central WWTP the renewal premium is $8,637. This coverage would be primary and provides an additional $1,250,500 in additional flood limit and includes a $25,000 Per Building Deductible. Equipment Breakdown In 2020 the County's Equipment Breakdown policy came off a three year rate agreement. We received two quotes and we recommend the County remain with the Incumbent, Travelers. Travelers has included the following -material changes on renewal: 1. Added Water Damage sublimit of $100,000, expiring policy provided up to policy limit. 2. Removed Deductible Waiver — This waived your deductible if the claim also triggered your Property policy and exceeded your property deductible. 3. Removed Underground Pressure Vessel and Piping coverage — This exclusion was removed as the exposure no longer applies to the assets being covered. This exclusion was carried forward last year from 2019 when the program included Utility assets. The Equipment Breakdown policy with Travelers is for the non-utility assets as presented in our Property section with a total insured value of $295,252,980. The renewal premium with Travelers is $9,827. This is a $985 which is an 11 % increase. The Utility Assets Equipment Breakdown coverage is included in Star Tech / ACE American Ins. Co. Inland Marine — Vehicles over $100,000, Contractors Equipment, Rented & Leased Equipment and Golf Carts We approached fifteen markets on your behalf and received various declinations stating they could not compete with your current program or provide coverage requested. The last several years Auto Physical Damage has become more difficult to place. Carriers our concerned with concentration of vehicles or equipment. Your renewal carrier has added a $2,500,000 sublimit for each peril of Named Wind Storm and Flood. The expiring program included Named Windstorm and Flood up to the $20,000,000 policy limit. We received the following: 1. Allianz - $20,000,000 Policy limit with $5,000,000 for Named Wind Storm and Flood = $160,000 (indication) 2. Colony— Provide Excess Coverage over $2,500,000 Named Wind Storm and Flood sublimits The County has a high concentration of vehicles and equipment located at 41St Street. The departments have items stored on 41St Street includes Road and Bridge, Utility Operations and Water & Sewer for approximately $8 million. 10 GaIa0, Insurance I Risk Management Consulting Limit Premium Annual Rate Rate Increase Markel $20,000,000 except $2.5M for Flood and NS $94,513 $0.2667 22.28% Markel / Colon $10,000,000 $182,810 $0.5158 143% Markel/Colony $20,000,000 $197,081 $0.5561 161% The County has a high concentration of vehicles and equipment located at 41St Street. The departments have items stored on 41St Street includes Road and Bridge, Utility Operations and Water & Sewer for approximately $8 million. 10 GaIa0, Insurance I Risk Management Consulting Indian River County Board of County Commissioners Historical Overview o00 Gallagher oo* CORE 360' The County will need to continue the audit the current policy and the County will need to provide the rental expenditure for leased equipment. Terrorism Property, NCBR Property & Terrorism Liability including NCBR The County's Terrorism & NCBR policy covers all locations currently reported on your Property program, and inland marine schedule. The total insured value for this renewal is $573,397,830; a .71 % exposure increase. The renewal premium is $24,950. The Terrorism Property Damage policy renewal premium is $11,750. We recommend the County purchase the Liability coverage being offered. The County has two choices: 1. Add Liability and share the $10 million limit for $2,500 2. Add Liability for dedicated limit of $3,000,000 Any One Occurrence/ $6,00,000 Aggregate for $5,000 The combined Terrorism premium is $41,700; a 20% increase from expiring. The Terrorism policy will remain on the Vehicle A form which follows your all risk placement with sublimits that override the all- risk in respect to terrorism only. These sublimits include Claims Preparation, Transit, Seepage Contamination and Pollution / Clean-up, etc. The policy provides financial loss as a result of a threat, loss of attraction including non -damage to the insured out to a 2.5 mile radius from an insured location and denial of access including non -damage out of 2.5 mile radius from an insured location. The NCBR Property Damage and Liability coverage form has been updated. The prior policy only provided coverage if the chemical, biological, nuclear or radiological weapons were result of terrorism or sabotage. The new form provides coverage to scheduled property as long as the damage is a result of chemical, biological, biochemical, radiological or nuclear material. Crime In 2018 we marketed your policy and the County remained with Hanover and opted for a three year term with annual installments. The County suffered a Crime loss during the three year term for $288,220. This year we marketed your program and received competitive option from Travelers and Hanover. Hanover has updated their Government form from an ISO 2006 to the latest 2015 edition. SUBJECT OF Form Exposure Premium Annual Rate 14-15 $14,816,005 $45,854 $0.3095 15-16 $19,531,041 $53,032 $0.2715 16-17 $21,970,630 $53,606 $0.2440 17-18 $22,973,220 $51,771 $0.2254 18-19 $25,088,873 $59,790 $0.2383 19-20 $29,592,882 $67,193 $0.2271 20-21 $34,365,792 $74,954 $0.2181 Change 3.12% 26% 22.28% The County will need to continue the audit the current policy and the County will need to provide the rental expenditure for leased equipment. Terrorism Property, NCBR Property & Terrorism Liability including NCBR The County's Terrorism & NCBR policy covers all locations currently reported on your Property program, and inland marine schedule. The total insured value for this renewal is $573,397,830; a .71 % exposure increase. The renewal premium is $24,950. The Terrorism Property Damage policy renewal premium is $11,750. We recommend the County purchase the Liability coverage being offered. The County has two choices: 1. Add Liability and share the $10 million limit for $2,500 2. Add Liability for dedicated limit of $3,000,000 Any One Occurrence/ $6,00,000 Aggregate for $5,000 The combined Terrorism premium is $41,700; a 20% increase from expiring. The Terrorism policy will remain on the Vehicle A form which follows your all risk placement with sublimits that override the all- risk in respect to terrorism only. These sublimits include Claims Preparation, Transit, Seepage Contamination and Pollution / Clean-up, etc. The policy provides financial loss as a result of a threat, loss of attraction including non -damage to the insured out to a 2.5 mile radius from an insured location and denial of access including non -damage out of 2.5 mile radius from an insured location. The NCBR Property Damage and Liability coverage form has been updated. The prior policy only provided coverage if the chemical, biological, nuclear or radiological weapons were result of terrorism or sabotage. The new form provides coverage to scheduled property as long as the damage is a result of chemical, biological, biochemical, radiological or nuclear material. Crime In 2018 we marketed your policy and the County remained with Hanover and opted for a three year term with annual installments. The County suffered a Crime loss during the three year term for $288,220. This year we marketed your program and received competitive option from Travelers and Hanover. Hanover has updated their Government form from an ISO 2006 to the latest 2015 edition. SUBJECT OF Form Hanover Discovery Hanover Discovery Travelers Discovery Employee Dishonesty $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 Forgery or Alteration $100,000 $100,000 $1,000,000 Inside Premises- Theft of Money & Securities $50,000 $50,000 $100,000 Inside Premises -Robbery or Safe Burglary of Other Property $50,000 $50,000 $100,000 11 d. Ga Iagher Insurance Risk Management Consulting Indian River County Board of County Commissioners #** Gallagher •*• CORE 360' SUBJECT OF INSURANCE 18-20 Hanover 21-23 Hanover $50,000 21-23 Travelers Not Provided Outside Premises $50,000 Computer Fraud $250,000 $250,000 Not Provided Funds Transfer Fraud $250,000 $250,000 Not Provided Money Orders & Counterfeit Currency $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 Credit Card Forgery or Alteration $1,000,000 $1,000,000 Included in Forgery or Alteration Destruction of Electronic Data or Computer Programs $10,000 $10,000 $50,000 Faithful Performance of Duty Coverage- Per Loss $1,000,000 $1,000,000 Included in Employee Dishonesty Prior Theft or Dishonesty $25,000 $25,000 Not Applicable False Pretense/ Social Engineering Fraud $50,000 50,000 Not Covered Claim Expense . - Deductibles Not Applicable Not Applicable $5,000 Per Loss except Pe $5,000 1 $5,000 1 $5,000 Employee Dishonesty $5,000 $25,000 $5,000 Destruction of Electronic Data or Computer Programs $10,000 $10,000 $5,000 False Pretense/ Social Engineering Fraud Deductibles $5,000 $10,000 Not Covered Per Loss except $5,000 $5,000 $5,000 Employee Dishonesty $5,000 $25,000 $5,000 Destruction of Electronic Data or Computer Programs $10,000 $10,000 $5,000 False Pretense/ Social Engineering Fraud $5,000 $10,000 Not Covered Premium Three Year Annual Installment $5,005 $6,597 except Year 3 - $6,616 $6,914 % Change 31.81% 38% Public Entity Excess Liability In 2020 the County was coming off a rate agreement with Brit. We marketed your program to five markets and coverage remained with Brit for a 6% rate increase. This year based on expiring marketing we approached Safety National. Safety declined to quote based on current premium. Brit has offered a renewal premium of $182,100 which is a $21,100 increase from expiring. This is a 13% premium increase. Based on the current Casualty market conditions, the rate increase is in line. This year Brit has moved to a new coverage form and here are the material changes: 1. Our current policy has nine coverage sections. The new form has ten coverage sections. 2. The intent is liability limits cannot be stacked, loss is recoverable under ONE coverage section 3. Added exclusion for: Any liability arising out of the flooding, cracking, seepage, accidental discharge, partial or complete structural failure or over -topping of a DAM for which the INSURED is legally liable. A DAM is defined as: DAM means any artificial barrier, including, but not limited to, spillways, berms or reservoirs that have the ability to impound water for the purpose of storage and/or control of water that is greater than 25 feet in height with storage capacity of more than 15 acre-feet or greater than 6 feet in height with storage capacity of more than 50 acre-feet. DAM also means levees and any dam classified as high hazard. 4. The Law Enforcement Liability now includes an exclusion for Auto Liability. This ensures Auto Liability claims addressed within Auto Liability coverage section. 5. Your expiring Errors & Omissions, Law Enforcement and General Liability sections included coverage for Sexual Abuse and Sexual Harassment. Sexual Abuse now has its own claims made coverage form and dedicated limit. The new coverage form requires potential claims be reported within 180 days after initial discovery of any actual, attempted or pending allegation. Many insured historically had Occurrence coverage within their General Liability and this is a trend we are seeing across the industry. The retro date for this section is May1, 2021. Prior Sexual Abuse coverage for the County was written on an Occurrence form. 12 Indian River County Board of County Commissioners 000 Gallagher oo®CORE 360' 6. Extended Reporting Period changed from 100% max annual premium to 200% max annual premium 7. Added Exclusion for Communicable Disease Brit will continue to offer loss control funds, this is a cost sharing arrangement and they will reimburse you 50% of the total cost up to $3,000. The services have to be pre -approved in order for the County to receive a refund. Brit continues to require Johns Eastern to follow their TPA guidelines to address how they expect them to manage and communicate claims. Excess Workers Compensation The Excess Workers Compensation market continues to be limited in Florida for entities that have Police and/or Fire exposures which are subject to presumption laws. As a result many entities our forced to take spit retentions with Police/Fire retentions of $750,000 to $1 million. In 2015, we were successful in negotiating $650,000 retention for all classifications except $1 million for USL&H and Jones Act. In 2016 we negotiated on your behalf a flat rate with Safety as well as a rate agreement for 2017, 2018, 2019 and 2020. The renewal premium is $229,137; a 12.27% rate increase at expiring retentions. Renewal Options SIR—Premium Rate $650,000 except $1 M for USL&H / Jones Act $229,137 $.247 $750,000 except $1 M for USL&H / Jones Act $202,234 $.218 Based on our review of losses from 2010 to present the divisions with the largest total incurred: 1. Fire Rescue - $5,245,429 2. Sheriff - $4,746,568 3. Road & Bridge - $2,112,500 We did approach Arch as well for a quote however they declined based on the current rate. Cyber / Excess Cyber Liability The County obtained its first Cyber Liability policy in 2014. The carrier was AIG and they provided a $1,000,000 limit with a $25,000 Deductible. Last year, coverage was moved to Travelers for a savings of $7,035. In 2020, the County suffered a security incident and used.True Digital to respond to the event. True Digital is not an approved vendor under Traveler's policy. We approached six markets and received one renewal quote and two indications, three declinations. 1. Star—. Indicated $40k to $50k premium with a $250k minimum retention and 25% coinsurance for all coverages triggered from a ransom event 2. Ascent— Indicated $38k with $100k in retention and cannot offer any Cyber Crime coverage 3. Tokio— Indicated a minimum of $30k range with a $50k in retention Travelers has offered a renewal quote of $30,368; a $6,067 premium increase with the expiring limit. of $1,000,000 and a $25,000 Deductible. This is a 25% rate increase. We requested True Digital be approved as the County's Forensic Vendor for future incidents. However based on the volatility of the market, the carrier does not want to approve prior to an event. Therefore if the County was to have another incident, they should approach the claims adjuster for approval to use True Digital prior to County incurring any expenses. 13 Ga agher nsu anc Ri MI. a en Go s 3 Indian River County Board of County Commissioners O00 Gallagher 0*•CORE360• We expect this coverage line to continue to evolve in the next couple of years. We recommend anticipating your deductible be increased in future renewals along with the premium. Ancillary Policies Watercraft Protection & Indemnity / Hull The renewal premium offered by Great America is $7,761; a 5% increase. Church General Liability The renewal premium is $2,087; a 16% increase. Several forms have been updated with new edition dates. 'Statutory AD&D (Firefighters & Sheriff) The renewal annual premium is $6,166; a Flat renewal. The County can agree to a two year term with annual installment for $5,953 ($213) or a two-year pre -paid for $11,906. County overview of expiring vs. renewal program for all coverages The following table provides an overall snapshot of the 2020 vs. 2021 1 Non -Utility Property $579,247 $650,004 12.22% 2 Utility Property $1,231,397 $1,351,104 9.72% 3 Flood $8,637 $8,637 0.00% 4 Equipment Breakdown $8,842 $9,827 11.14% 5 Terrorism Property Damage $11,686 $16,750 43.33% 6 NCBR Property Damage / Terrorism Liability $23,095 $24,950 8.03% 7 Inland Marine $76,528 $94,513 23.50% 8 Crime $5,005 $6,597 31.81% g Parking lot GL $1,790 $2,087 16.59% 10 Excess General Liability, Excess Public Officials & Employment Practice, Excess Auto Liability $161,000 $182,100 13.11% 11 Excess Workers Compensation $198,202 $229,137 15.61% 12 Privacy & Network Security Liability $24,301 $30,368 24.97% 13 Watercraft Hull & P&I $7,390 $7,761 5.02% 14 Statutory AD&D $6,192 $6,166 -0.42% 15 Gallagher Fee $175,000 $175,000 0.00% $2,518,312 $2,795,001 Difference from Expiring $276,689 10.99% GAGED.. Utility Property— Reduce Named Storm and Flood sublimits ($69,941) Terrorism Liability — Share limit with $10M Property Damage ($2,500) Indian River County Board of County Commissioners OOO Gallagher Oe*CORE360- Conclusion We look forward to reviewing this proposal with you in detail and truly appreciate your business. In the following pages we will review the results, changes, enhancements and options by each line of coverage: Michael Gillon Erica Connick, ARM -P Area President Area Senior Vice President Ga agMConsulling Insurance Risk Manage Inland Marine - $10M Limit (including Windstorm and Flood $88,297 Inland Marine- $20M Limit (including Windstorm & Flood) $102,568 Excess Workers Comp - $750k SIR ($26,903) including Sheriff Accidental Death & Dismemberment (Two Year ($213) Term with Annual Installment) Conclusion We look forward to reviewing this proposal with you in detail and truly appreciate your business. In the following pages we will review the results, changes, enhancements and options by each line of coverage: Michael Gillon Erica Connick, ARM -P Area President Area Senior Vice President Ga agMConsulling Insurance Risk Manage (?A11 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA MEMORANDUM TO: Jason E. Brown, County Administrator THROUGH: Richard B. Szpyrka, P.E., Public Works Director FROM: Eric Charest, Natural Resources Manager SUBJECT: Presentation of the Indian River County Beach Preservation Plan (2019 Update) DATE: April 5, 2021 DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS Indian River County developed and adopted its first comprehensive Beach Preservation Plan (BPP) in 1988, which included a management strategy for addressing coastal erosion along the County's 22.4 miles of shoreline. The BPP has been subsequently updated in 1998, 2002, 2008 and 2015. On April 17, 2018 the Board of County Commissioners (BCC) approved a contract with Stantec Consulting Services, Inc. for professional coastal engineering services in Indian River County under RFQ 2018008. On December 4, 2018, the BCC approved Work Order No. 1 with Stantec Consulting Services, Inc. for professional coastal engineering services related to updating the County's Beach Preservation Plan. The 2019 Update to the BPP is complete and is being presented to the Board for approval. The BPP is an advisory document only, and approval does not commit the County to any specific action. In addition to staff recommendation, on March 15, 2021, the County's Beach and Shore Preservation Advisory Committee made a supporting motion recommending approval of the 2019 BPP Update. The main izoals of the 2019 BPP update are consistent with previous versions and include: • Avoid adverse impacts to environmental resources including nearshore Hardbottom • Assess the vulnerability of upland property up to future storm events • Document the overall performance of the management program from 2013 through 2019 Some of the highlights of the BBP update include: • Erosional and/or accretional rates observed on the beaches within the County from the 2013 through 2019 time period. 250 • An evaluation of the County's beach management efforts, demonstrating continued success of the program with an annualized shoreline change of 0.3 ft/yr over the 2013 through 2019 time period. • An evaluation of alternative beach management options was also performed for this update. This included strategies such as no action, beach fill, and use of coastal armoring structures; concluding that the beach fill alternative remains the lowest, most cost- effective strategy for future beach management. • An outline of future program costs for planning purposes, 'including long term projections going out to 2034. • An overview of potential funding sources to implement the plan. FUNDING Local funding of Beach Restoration includes. a portion of Local Option Tourist Tax Revenue. No funding is required to approve the 2019 Update to the Beach Preservation Plan. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Board approve the 2019 Update to the Beach Preservation Plan. ATTACHMENT Executive summary of the 2019 update to the BPP Beach and Shores Committee Letter of Support The complete Beach Preservation Plan can be viewed at the County's Coastal Engineering office in Public Works APPROVED AGENDA ITEM FOR APRIL 20. 2021 251 2019 BEACH PRESERVATION PLAN UPDATE INDIAN RIVER COUNTY Executive Summary The Atlantic coastline of Indian River County is an indispensable asset providing economic and recreational value, critical environmental habitat, and storm protection. Property along the County's coast has an appraised value of approximately $4 billion, which accounts for approximately 20 percent of the total property value within the County. The County's beaches are estimated to have a recreational benefit of $33.1 million annually through the tourist industry and use by residents. The coastline and surrounding ecosystems are also home to a variety of endangered and threatened species, providing foraging, nesting, and nursery habitats. The beach and dune system also serve as a vital defense from coastal storms by dissipating wind and wave energy. The first Beach Preservation. Plan (BPP) was developed in 1988 to evaluate and maintain the resources along the coastline under the County's Coastal Restoration Program. Indian River County has funded periodic updates to the BPP, occurring in 1998, 2002, 20083 2015, and 2019. The purpose of the current update is to support the County in managing its beaches, assess the impact of recent storm events, evaluate current vulnerability to future storm events, and document the overall performance of the management program from 2013 to 2019. As of 2005, the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) has classified 15.7 mi of Indian River County's 22.4 mi shoreline as "critically eroded", a 73% increase from 9.1 mi, following the 2004 hurricane season. General shoreline trends were determined looking at the annualized shoreline change. Nourishment efforts in the 2002 to 2013 time period have been successful, with a Countywide shoreline change of 2.6 ft/yr. Previous BPP updates have shown that Sectors 3, 5, 6, 7, and 8 experienced a shoreline advance that was either greater than the advances seen in the previous two time periods (1972 to 1986 and 1986 to 2005), or a reversal of a previous shoreline retreat. Sectors 1 and 2 also experienced an advance from 2002 to 2013, though it was less of an advance than the 1986 to 2005 time period. Sector 4 is the only sector with an average shoreline reversal in the 2002 to 2013 time period, in contrast to an average advance in the 1986 to 2005 time period. The Countywide annualized shoreline change, from 2013 to 2019, was 0.3 ft/yr, which is less than that of any of the previous time periods. Sectors 2, 6, and 8 experienced shoreline advance/accretion. These sectors have historically been more stable than the rest of the County. All other sectors experienced shoreline retreat, ranging from -1.7 ft/yr in Sectors 4 and 7 to -0.3 ft/yr in Sector 5. These values indicate that overall, 2013 to 2019 was a period of on average of shoreline advance in the County but less than `� 252 2019 BEACH PRESERVATION PLAN UPDATE INDIAN RIVER COUNTY previous years, a trend due mainly to a lack of beach nourishment activity in some Sectors and the impact from several hurricanes. As a result, several strategic management recommendations are presented herein. The past 20 years of carrying out the recommendations in the BPP have shown to be effective in mitigating erosion along the coastline. However, based on the results within this BPP update and the expected impacts of climate change it is recommended that adjustments be made to the management strategies. Planning for climate change is paramount to the County's successful management of the beaches and preparation for a resilient future. Most importantly, continued implementation of sand bypassing and beach nourishment projects in Sectors 1 & 2, and Sectors 3, 4, 5, and 7 respectively are recommended. However, planning for more frequent maintenance events and replenishment after storm events is necessary to increase project performance and combat expected impacts of climate change. 253 J BEACH AND SHORE PRESERVATION ADVISORY COMMITTEE VERC, March 15, 2021 David Barney 1550 Penlynn Street Sebastian, FL 32958 Dear Chairman Flescher: On behalf of the Indian River County Beach and Shore Preservation Advisory Committee, I am writing this letter to advise you of our support for the final draft of the 2019 Beach Preservation Plan (BPP). The document is expected to be presented for approval by the Board of County Commissioners (BCC) at an upcoming, regularly -scheduled meeting. The text has been carefully reviewed by our Committee members and we feel it is an excellent blueprint for protecting one of our County's most precious natural resources. In fact, at our meeting on March 15, 2021, the members voted unanimously (8-0) to accept the revised BPP and recommend it to the BCC for approval. Should you have any detailed questions regarding our thought process, please feel free to contact me directly at 772-913-2349 or daveconb a amail.com. Sincerely, David Barney, Chairman Indian River County Beach and Shore Preservation Advisory Committee CC: Rich Szpyrka, Director of Public Works Eric Charest, Natural Resources Manager, Coastal Engineering Division 1801 27th Street, Building A Vero .Beach, FL 32960 (772) 226-1490 254 t S" * .......... 1.9 70 (D r) (D CL 0 0- 1 1 1 00~ F�w b`'c" C37 P 1eWXE W N e M-11 —'� Pk xl #w �. t :.MAE`' t� 1..4 _ X : REE a� ��'� F Ca OD fro OJ O) OUR OOf . 0 O� • ^O��1BY 11O�A CO - V t 1 NWIMM C) Cyl 91 ��.. �•. 3 i £ ^r ��i !X' CuB ""I co cn cD AR ;77 "^gip cD CL I<< cn m CD ' C�� r« mxro �' c ch ' CD CD c'<�: W3 , O rng 0 -� -0 N W Q,, a� 7a O) � 1 C f < ro 0 `� MEIII g 3E' ,11 Indp � m 'S mME nri o ' CD g� rn A' Pk xl #w �. :.MAE`' _ X : REE a� ��'� F Ca 3 pry �FDEP R•McnumeMs - - - - - in a+ . 'o U � ir+•. �i 'in �' _ere 'ca in ;i+ in iS ter b � :� �i `ci 'v.: . ii IRn .� sz us �,, f �,,,, �,, �•r.Lt.I 3i as 41 f�IJ�„•t111u111LP,��J..11..i1111� Q.• 6” G v ,,� crys Z;� , F �+ ,, iii 'u�• iv IJ iu AA 't�„�,�a,,, iry^.a�-ryry'�'. �. 1 % �.n G�:^��(a+ . -m{1v�,��yC��q��^�,i�++ ��ry�ry-�-ry��u ..^.•1. •.i '-1_^..1"t7"fwTnTt'rTT'ST�'.Tf'!'1`I'tf"11''3'TTI,f'1'1"'tY�'Y"i`fT''li'1'f"�'9T4'�4T.i•'77.1 _ '�'a�rYl',""�P`�7-f!'11 -.. op i t. } F t` e _ a7at0J 7y0y ,:,56, i Ul- a El Cl cn U W N a 9 M .O � N O N Ln N "O N N O c7 f7 rt O O cn Q Wcn CD 01 Q (D r r O N O O. � W O O O (n --n 0 O 5 . O O M �� fA eft ¢c f 'Alf it. Ina 4 1pq. z4-) / APT, "z I s s b i!. =s � f i� i Y. 14, 4 ttt (; u i .- � < 1pq. z4-) / ��'i,•`� W�*z,€'-.tz `'£ �St i yi.'�s .cty'�.T°l *c �35•k .� '.i`% UE IW a d r b0, PM "ro A� r� d � '"��, _ p �, � •® ® fit'. VI JF out ON MR rz , �,� qsr t `moi ��r ti� z. �uT��•, �� 1 a �. � '•rp� r�7� �t3i' F cx. '�N'�d�t, ,.�S��i„��.e `xx.' � � a, ' - ''�'�Tr a�' �- ��"f��}'�;)£�S� `��r� ��3`a�� ,�(�, a �� ► pan ��. a 1 -, - " �,�' *i. ,L '{A�.C'•T'; �� i�ri� �jp.�i�i',�fi y r73� i '` y"+lts�� , - - Sea level rise (ft) I %RW N O llt N t/1 N Lt W N A Ul V1 0 lq� Zq-IV �)q, �5q- J.�� 1. t a j� St r ^ w 1, 0/ �5v - / 8 N m 03 C37 Ln.1, It U) (D V) hi (D C37 0 7v V) 1< Nt (D --Ox � baa EL- V) V) rp 1A =1 C: rD (D --- wix (D WZA,1� (D UD 0 M Lo 1W, 'Y r Y- X to ai wrq,, leva- v N. 0 V) Ln e W-54 (n P;z aft't -0 , Va, (D =3 J-4 CL (D 'KA m s 1Pq, ��-A/ r ri r i { x r J 4 1Pq, ��-A/ fig. 2s -v- �3 �, �-s�- � Departmental Indian River County, Florida Department of Utility Services Board Memorandum Date: April 13, 2021 To: Jason E. Brown, County Administrator From: Vincent Burke, P.E., Director of Utility Services Prepared By: John M. Boyer, P.E., Utilities Engineer Subject: North Sebastian Water and Sewer Project Phase 2, Award of Bid No. 2021019 Background: On January 29, 2021, the Indian River County (IRC) Purchasing Department opened sealed contractor's bids forthe North County Water and Sewer Project Phase 2. Of the ten (10) bids received, two (2) were disqualified by the Purchasing Manager as being non-responsive. The eight (8) responsive bids were forwarded to the project's engineering consultant, Masteller & Moler, Inc. (MM) for review, and they have returned the recommendation of award (Attachment 1). Analysis: As described in their, recommendation, MM is not satisfied that the apparent low bidder, Southern Underground Industries, Inc., is qualified or capable of successfully undertaking the project. MM goes on to recommend that the project be awarded to the next lowest bidder, Centerline, Inc. The two bids are compared in the following: Southern Underground Industries, Inc. $3,726,644.00 Centerline, Inc. $3,881,269.00 Centerline's bid is an increase of $154,625.00 (4%) over Southern Underground Industries' bid. However, Southern Underground Industries, Inc. is unknown to the Indian River County Department of Utility Services (IRCDUS) staff, and the negative reviews returned to MM are cause for concern for a project of this complexity and importance. In contrast, Centerline, Inc.. is known by IRCDUS staff to be a responsible and capable contractor, and their references returned good reviews. IRCDUS staff therefore agrees with MM's recommendation to award the bid to Centerline, Inc. The Purchasing Manager has received and is reviewing a timely protest by Southern Underground, asserting that they are the lowest, responsive and responsible bidder. The inclusion of this staff report in the agenda indicates that protest has been denied and Southern Underground will be anticipated to make an appeal of that denial before the Commission. Page I of 22 F:\Utilities\UTILITY - Engineering\Projects -Utility Construction Permits\IRC - North Sebastian S25 (M&M)\Agenda Items\Phase II\Bid 255 Award\BCC Agenda Item Centerline.docx North County Water & Sewer Phase 2 Award of Bid #2021019 Funding: Much of the project cost will be covered by grant funds from the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP), the Indian River Lagoon National Estuary Program (IRLNEP), and the St Johns River Water Management District (SJRWMD). The remainder will be paid for by Optional Sales Tax funds and assessment funds. Funds for the water portion of the project are derived from the assessment levied against the benefiting properties. Project Funding: Agency Account Number Amount FDEP N/A $3,250,000.00 IRLNEP N/A $ 204,017.69 SJRWMD N/A $1,280,818.77 IRC Optional Sales Tax 31526836-066510-17513 $ 561,996.00 Sebastian Phase 2 Water & Sewer 473-169000-17513 $ 361,890.00 Water Impact Fee 472034-343650 $ 209,300.00 Miscellaneous Income 471034-343670 $ 33,067.79 Total Project Funding: $5,901,090.25 Recommendation: Staff recommends the Board of County Commissioners award the North County Water and Sewer Project Phase 2 to Centerline, Inc. for $3,881,269.00. Attachments: 1. Construction Contract Recommendation of Award; Masteller & Moler, Inc. 256 Page 2 of 2 February 18, 2021 Mr. Vincent Burke, Director Indian River County Department of Utility Services 1801 27th Street Vero Beach, Florida 32960 RE: Indian River County North County Water & Sewer System Phase 2 Construction Contract Recommendation of Award Bid No. 2021019; UCP #3556 Our File # 1422-2 Dear Mr. Burke: Bids were received for the referenced project and opened on January 29, 2021 at 2:00 p.m. Ten (10) General Contractors submitted bids, which varied from a low of $3,726,64400 to a high of $5,337,0940-0 with two (2) of the contractors' bids being disqualified. The Engineer's Estimate for the project was $4,400;00000. The low bidder is Southern Underground Industries, Inc. of Pompano Beach, Florida. Our office has reviewed each of the eligible eight (8) submitted bids for correctness and completeness of the bid form and the lowest three submitted bids for correctness and completeness of bid package. We have found the low bidder's bid documents to be complete and in order. The following is a summary of the bid submittals: Name & Location Total Bid Bid Package 1. Southern Underground Industries, Inc. (Pompano Beach, FL) 2. Centerline, Inc. (Palm City, FL) 3. DP Development, LLC (Palm Springs, FL) 4. Timothy Rose Contracting, Inc (Vero Beach, FL) 5. Ric -Man Construction Florida, Inc (Deerfield Beach, FL) 6. Lanzo Construction Co., Florida (Deerfield Beach, FL) 7. Giannetti Contracting Corporation (Pompano Beach, FL) 8. Prime Construction Group, Inc. (Orlando, FL) $3,726,644.00 Complete $3,881,269.00 Complete $4,118,951.00* Complete Corrected from $4,123,951.00 $4,131,255.39 Bid Form Complete $4,427,965.40* Bid Form Complete Corrected from $4,32,965.40 $4,831,457.54 Bid Form Complete $4,841,740.00 Bid Form Complete $5,337,094.00 Bid Form Complete * Mobilization exceeds amount specified in Section 01025 ($120,000.00 allowed; $125,000.00 submitted); however, even with the corrected amount, they are still not the low bidder. 257 Mr. Vincent Burke 02/18/2021 Page 2 of 2 After checking the submitted previous project references, we are not satisfied that Southern Underground Industries, Inc. are qualified or appears to be capable of successfully undertaking this project. Sean C. Green, E.I., of Masteller & Moler, Inc., initially contacted three (3) of the submitted references for previous projects most similar to the work proposed with Bid No. 2021019 and received two (2) favorable reviews and recommendations and one (1) negative review and a recommendation to not contract with Southern Underground Industries, Inc. for the proposed work. Following the initial three (3) phone interviews, and given the nature of the negative review received, additional references were requested from Southern Underground Industries, Inc. for projects specific to gravity sewer installation and roadway restoration. An additional phone interview was conducted with a reference for a project in the City of Arcadia, Florida for the installation of 8" PVC gravity sewer and related sewer laterals, manholes, and roadway restoration. Additionally, the project consisted of water main installation and related appurtenances, and is representative of the works proposed under Bid No. 2021019. This follow-up interview also resulted in a negative review and recommendation to not contract with Southern Underground Industries, Inc. for the proposed work. Reference forms were sent to the Project Managers to be completed and are attached herewith in Appendix A, "Southern Underground Industries, Inc. Reference Forms". Julie L. Karleskint, PE, City of Arcadia provided a negative review of Southern Underground Industries, Inc. during the phone interview, but did not return the Reference Form. The Town of Palm Beach, who provided the other negative review, returned an incomplete Reference Form and stated that a written referral would not be provided. As a result of the negative reviews and recommendation to not proceed with Southern Underground Industries, our firm proceeded with contacting references listed for the next lowest correct bidder, Centerline, Inc. of Palm City. Sean C. Green, E.I., of Masteller & Moler, Inc. telephone interviewed three (3) references given by the Centerline, Inc. and received favorable comments. In addition, our office has had experience with Centerline, Inc. on several of our utility projects and has been pleased with their performance. Reference forms were also sent to the Project Managers for the past projects performed by Centerline, Inc. and are attached herewith in Appendix B, "Centerline Inc. Reference Forms". All three (3) references provided completed reference forms. Based on the bid package and references, and contingent upon approval of their bid package by the County Attorney, I am hereby recommending award of the contract for Indian River County Bid # 2021019 to, Centerline, Inc. of Palm City, Florida in the amount of $3,881,269.00. Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any questions or comments. Sincerely, MASTELLER & MOILER, INC. Earl H. Masteller, PE, BCEE President EHM/cab cc: John Boyer, PE, Utilities File #1422-2 (2021019_N C W& S P h 2_Awa rd Recom_21-0218. docx) 258 1-3-4, MEMORANDUM TO: Board of County Commissioners FROM: Dylan Reingold, County Attorney DATE: April 8, 2021 SUBJECT: Interlocal Agreement with City of Fellsmere for Contractor Licensing BACKGROUND. Section 400.01(1) of the County's Code of Ordinances requires all persons engaged in the business of construction, contracting, and subcontracting to have a valid certificate of competency issued by either the Indian River County Building Department or the Florida Department of Business and Professional Regulation. The City of Fellsmere has approached the County about using the County's certificate of competency in lieu of the City's own certificate of competency. The City would also like to use the County's Construction Board of Adjustments and Appeals in lieu of the City establishing its own regulatory board to monitor persons and entities performing contracting activities. The County Attorney's Office and the City have worked to draft the attached interlocal agreement. Under the agreement, the County would be responsible for issuing certificate of competency licenses and renewals to contractors and to schedule Construction Board of Adjustment and Appeals hearings pertaining to such licenses and renewals, if necessary. The City would be responsible for reporting, investigating, researching and prosecuting any contractor licensing complaints pertaining to any work conducted in the City. The agreement may be terminated for any reason by either party upon 90 days' written notice. FUNDING. The City of Fellsmere will pay for the recording of the interlocal agreement and for the reporting, investigating, researching and prosecuting of any contractor licensing complaints pertaining to any work conducted in the City. Thus, there is no funding associated with this matter. RECOMMENDATION. The County Attorney's Office recommends that the Board approve the interlocal agreement. ATTACHMENTS. Draft interlocal agreement 259 INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN INDIAN RIVER COUNTY AND THE CITY OF FELLSMERE REGARDING THE CITY OF FELLSMERE'S ACCEPTANCE OF A CERTIFICATE OF COMPETENCY ISSUED BY THE INDIAN RIVER COUNTY BUILDING DEPARTMENT THIS INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT (the "Agreement"), made and entered into this day of , 2021, between Indian River County, Florida (the "County") and the City of Fellsmere, a municipal corporation created pursuant to the laws of the State of Florida (the "City"), provides for the City's acceptance of the County's issuance of certificates of competency to contractors. WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, Chapter 400 of the County's Code of Ordinances sets forth the contractor and building regulations applicable to any person engaging in the business of construction, contracting, and subcontracting within the County's jurisdiction; and WHEREAS, Section 400.01(1) of the County's Code of Ordinances requires all persons engaged in the business of construction, contracting, and subcontracting to have a valid certificate of competency issued by: (i) the Indian River County Building Department in accordance with Chapter 400 of the County's Code of Ordinances; or (ii) the Florida Department of Business and Professional Regulation in accordance with Chapter 489, Florida Statutes; and WHEREAS, the City desires to accept the County's certificate of competency in lieu of the City's own certificate of competency, to which the County has no objection; and WHEREAS, the City also desires to utilize the County's Construction Board of Adjustments and Appeals in lieu of the City establishing its own regulatory board to monitor persons and entities performing contracting activities, to which the County has no objection, and to accept any decision made by the County's Construction Board of Adjustments and Appeals Board, including, but not limited to, the suspension or revocation of a certificate of competency; and WHEREAS, the City and the County share a common goal of ensuring that all persons engaged in the business of construction, contracting, and subcontracting are qualified and competent to engage in such activity; and WHEREAS, the City and the County are mutually committed to address the aforementioned concerns; and 260 WHEREAS, pursuant to section 489.131(10), Florida Statutes, "[n]o municipal or county government may issue any certificate of competency or license for any contractor defined in s. 489.105(3)(a) -(o) after July 1, 1993, unless such local government exercises disciplinary control and oversight over such locally licensed contractors, including forwarding a recommended order in each action to the board as provided in subsection (7)"; and WHEREAS, Section 489.131(11), Florida Statutes, states "[a]ny municipal or county government which enters or has in place a reciprocal agreement which accepts a certificate of competency or license issued by another municipal or county government in lieu of its own certificate of competency or license allowing contractors defined in s. 489.105(3)(a) -(o), shall file a certified copy of such agreement with the board not later than 60 days after July 1, 1993, or 30 days after the effective date of such agreement." NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual undertakings and agreements herein contained and assumed, and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are acknowledged by the parties, the County and City agree as follows: SECTION 1. RECITALS INCORPORATED. The above recitals are true and correct and are incorporated herein by this reference. SECTION 2. PUBLIC PURPOSE. The City and County are entering into this Agreement in order to allow the City to delegate certain functions pertaining to certificate of competency licensing in accordance with subsections 10 and 11 of section 489.131, Florida Statutes. This Agreement serves a municipal purpose and satisfies, fulfills, and is pursuant to and for a public purpose, is in the public interest, and is a proper exercise of each party's power and authority with respect to their individual governmental authority. SECTION 3. DURATION, TERMINATION, AND AMENDMENT. (a) The term of this Agreement commences on the Effective Date. (b) This Agreement shall remain in full force and effect unless terminated per section 3(c); (c) This Agreement may be terminated for any reason by either party upon 90 days' written notice to the other party. This Agreement may only be amended by the mutual consent of the parties and in the same manner as its original adoption. SECTION 4. DUTIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES. 261 (a) County shall be responsible for issuing certificate of competency licenses and renewals to contractors and to schedule Construction Board of Adjustment and Appeals hearings pertaining to such licenses and renewals, if necessary. (b) City shall be responsible for reporting, investigating, researching and prosecuting any contractor licensing complaints pertaining to any work conducted in the City. (c) Within thirty (30) days of the Effective Date of this Agreement, the City shall file a certified copy of this Agreement with the State of Florida Construction Industry Licensing Board as required by Section 489.131(11), Florida Statutes. SECTION 5. CONSTRUCTION BOARD OF ADJUSTMENTS AND APPEALS. County's Construction Board of Adjustments and Appeals shall be used to monitor persons and entities performing contracting activities. SECTION 6. NOTICE. (a) Unless specified by a party in writing otherwise, all notices, demands, or other papers required to be given or made by this Agreement, or which may be given or made, by either party to the other, will be given or made in writing and addressed as follows: City: City Manager City of Fellsmere 22 S. Orange Street Fellsmere, FL 32948 with a copy to the City Attorney County: County Administrator 180127 th Street Vero Beach, Florida 32960-3365 with a copy to the County Attorney The parties will consider notice to be properly given if (1) personally delivered; (2) sent by certified U.S. Mail, return receipt requested; or (3) sent by an overnight letter delivery company; and (b) The parties will consider the effective date of notice to be the date personally delivered; or, if sent by U.S. Mail, the date of postmark; or, if sent by an overnight letter delivery company, the date the notice was picked up by the overnight letter delivery company from the party giving notice. SECTION 7. SOVEREIGN IMMUNITY. Nothing contained herein shall be construed as a waiver or attempted waiver of any immunity from, or limitation of, liability either party has under 262 the Doctrine of Sovereign Immunity of Section 768.28, Florida Statutes, and the Florida Constitution. SECTION & BUSINESS RELATIONSHIP. The City and the County are not partners, or joint ventures or agents of each other for any activities pursuant to this Agreement, and no such relationship between them shall be deemed to exist by virtue of this Agreement. SECTION 9. CONSTRUCTION. The headings of the sections of this Agreement are for the purpose of convenience only, and shall not be deemed to expand, limit, or modify the provisions contained in such Sections. All pronouns and any variations thereof shall be deemed to refer to the masculine, feminine or neuter, singular or plural, as the identity of the party or parties may require. The parties hereby acknowledge and agree that each was properly represented by counsel and this Agreement was negotiated and drafted at arm's length so that the judicial rule of construction to the effect that a legal document shall be construed against the draftsperson shall be inapplicable to this Agreement. SECTION 10. MERGER AND MODIFICATION. This Agreement incorporates and includes all prior and contemporaneous negotiations, correspondence, conversations, agreements or understandings applicable to the matters contained herein and the parties agree that there are no commitments, agreements, or understandings of any nature whatsoever concerning the subject matter of the Agreement that are not contained in this document. Accordingly, it is agreed that no deviation from the terms hereof shall be predicated upon any prior or contemporaneous representations or agreements, whether oral or written, unless the provisions of the parol evidence rule applies. SECTION 11. GOVERNING LAW AND VENUE. This Agreement, including all attachments hereto, shall be construed according to the laws of the State of Florida. Venue for any lawsuit brought by either party against the other party or otherwise arising out of this Agreement shall be in Indian River County, Florida, or, in the event of federal jurisdiction, in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida. SECTION 12. CONFLICT. To the extent of any conflict between this Agreement and any existing City or County agreement, this Agreement will be deemed to be controlling. This Agreement is not intended to amend or repeal any existing City or Indian River County ordinance. SECTION 13. SEVERABILITY. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or portion of this Agreement is, for any reason, held invalid or unconstitutional by any court of competent jurisdiction, such section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct, and independent provision and such holding shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Agreement. 263 SECTION 14. RECORDATION. This Agreement shall be recorded in the Office of the Circuit Court in Indian River County. The City shall bear the costs of recordation of this Agreement. SECTION 15. EFFECTIVE DATE. This Agreement will become effective upon its filing with the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Indian River County, Florida, as required by Section 163.01 (11), Florida Statutes. APPROVED this day of INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA By: Joseph E. Flescher, Chairman ATTEST: Jeffrey R. Smith, Clerk of Court and Comptroller M. Deputy Clerk APPROVED: By: Jason E. Brown, County Administrator Approved as to form and legal sufficiency. By: Dylan Reingold, County Attorney F.-Attorney/Dylan/2021.03.15 ila - Contractor License (RL).docx 2021. CITY OF FELLSMERE, a municipal corporation and political subdivision of the State of Florida 1-2 Joel Tyson, Mayor ATTEST: Maria Suarez -Vazquez City Clerk APPROVED: By: Mark D. Mathes, City Manager Approved as to form and legal sufficiency. By: Warren W. Dill, City Attorney 264 i 3. B. MEMORANDUM TO: Board of County Commissioners FROM: William K. DeBraal, Deputy County Attorney THROUGH: Richard B. Szpyrka, P.E., Public Works Director DATE: April 13, 2021 SUBJECT: Approval of Developer's Agreement with Ryall Development Group, LLC for Liberty Park Subdivision BACKGROUND. In 2008, Ryall Development Group, LLC (Ryall) received conceptual PD approval to develop approximately 587.57 acres as a Planned Development Traditional Neighborhood Design ("PDTND") for a project known as Liberty Park (Project). The Project is located on the east and west sides of 66th Avenue, south of County Road 510 and north of 81st Street. The Project's Phases 1-A and 1-B have been submitted for preliminary PD plat approval. While the Project is a traditional neighborhood design, it is also a planned development and approval must include benefits to the public, such as right-of-way contributions, stormwater treatment and existing roadway improvements. The first two phases will consist of a total of 159 units. A sketch of the project highlighting Phases 1-A and 1-B is found below in Figure 1. 265 .ALVNJAII LN", 7 IT Figure 1. INU 266 As part of the PD process, Ryall is required to enter into a Developer's Agreement with the County in order to receive preliminary PD plat approval. The parties now bring the proposed Developer's Agreement to the Board for consideration and approval. The terms of the Developer's Agreement are as follows: In conjunction with the development of Phase 1-A of the Project, Ryall will design,. permit, and construct 81St Street from its current terminus at Liberty Park School to 70th Avenue. Upon its completion, this section of 81 St Street will be dedicated to the County for use as a public street. Similar to the agreement entered into with DiVosta for construction of 53rd Street,. Ryall will be responsible for the maintenance of any landscaping or irrigation installed in the right-of-way. If Ryall installs landscaping and/or irrigation in the County right-of-way, a Memo of Understanding (MOU) will be required before permitting of said improvements. • In conjunction with the development of Phases 1-A and 1-B of the Project, Ryall will design, permit, and construct 70th Avenue from 81st Street to the Sebastian River Improvement District R13E drainage ditch. This roadway section will be dedicated to the County by the final plat for each phase. In conjunction with development of Phase 1-B of the Project, the Developer will design, permit and construct 70th Avenue from the Sebastian River Improvement District R13E drainage ditch to County Road (CR) 510. If CR 510 remains unimproved (not widened to 4 -lane divided section) at the time the Developer proposes to construct 70th Avenue between SRID R13E drainage ditch and CR 510, the Developer will be responsible for the cost to design and construct a temporary span wire traffic signal, if warranted by a Traffic Impact Study. Should CR 510 be improved consistent with the FDOT planned PD&E improvements (4 -lane divided section) prior to.the Developer moving forward with the 70th Avenue improvements between SRID R13E and CR 510, it is anticipated that a traffic signal will have been constructed at CR 510 and Power Line Road (70th Avenue) intersection in conjunction with FDOT proposed widening that could be utilized. This roadway section will be dedicated to.the County by the final plat for this phase. If Ryall constructs a lake on the Ryall Stormwater Park Tract prior to the County constructing 66th Avenue from 81St to 851h Streets, then Ryall agrees to incorporate sufficient capacity to provide stormwater treatment for the impervious area for the right-of-way of 661 Avenue from 81 St Street to 85th Street in its four -lane improved condition. However, if the County elects to proceed with widening 66th Avenue before Ryall constructs a stormwater pond on the Ryall Stormwater Park Tract, then the County will be responsible for all costs associated with the construction of drainage improvements for 66th Avenue between 81St Street and 85th Street, and Developer will provide a suitable location within the Park to permit the County to construct a temporary stormwater facility. Within 60 days from the date of this Agreement, Ryall will dedicate to the County without compensation the 6 needed right-of-way parcels for 66th Avenue between 81st Street and County Road 510, and all right-of-way on 81 st Street east of 66th Avenue. A sketch of the right-of-way parcels is attached to the Developer's Agreement. • Developer will design, permit, and excavate an extension of the Sebastian River Drainage District D1 3E drainage ditch from 69th Avenue eastward for a distance of 1,300 feet, more or less. Developer and County shall each be responsible for Y2 of all associated costs. As you may recall, the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) is in the planning stages of expanding County Road 510 from 2 to 4 lanes adjacent to the Project. Depending on the timing of the Ryall Project, the County's 66th Avenue Project and the CR 510 FDOT project, additional or amended Developer 267 Agreements may be necessary. All road construction pursuant to this Agreement shall be in compliance with FDOT standards. FUNDING. Funding for this project, 66th Avenue/69th Street to 85th Street, is programmed in the County's 5 -year CIE. Funding sources include Traffic Impact Fees- Account # 10215141-066510-16009, total 5 year budget $6,100,000; Traffic Impact Fees 2020- Account# 10415141-066510-16009 total 5 year budget $1,658,955; and Optional Sales Tax- Account # 31521441-066510-16009 total five year budget $2,820,924. RECOMMENDATION. Staff recommends that the Indian River County Board of County Commissioners approve the Developer's Agreement with Ryall Development Group, LLC for the Liberty Park Project and authorize the Chairman to execute the Agreement. Attachment:. Developer's Agreement Copies to Richard B. Szpyrka, P.E., Public Works Director Bruce Barkett, Esq. Ryall Development Group 268 LIBERTY PARK, PHASE 1A AND 1B DEVELOPER'S AGREEMENT BETWEEN INDIAN RIVER COUNTY AND RYALL DEVELOPMENT GROUP, LLC. THIS AGREEMENT ("Agreement") is made and entered into this , day of , 2021, by and between Ryall Development Group, LLC., a Florida limited liability company, whose address is PO Box 1779, Vero Beach, FL 329614779 ("Developer") and Indian River County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida ("County") whose address is 180127 th Street, Vero Beach, FL 32960, ("County"), WITNESSETH WHEREAS, in 2008, Developer applied to, and received from, Indian River County, approval to develop approximately 587.57 acres as a Planned Development Traditional Neighborhood Design ("PDTND") for a project known as Liberty Park; and WHEREAS, County and Developer share mutual goals and have determined that they are able to assist each other with respect to certain items related to the development of Liberty Park, including roadway and drainage improvements, right-of-way acquisition, and other improvements some of which were included as conditions of approval for the Liberty Park PDTND; and WHEREAS, County and Developer desire to enter into this Agreement with respect to development of Phase IA and Phase 113 of the Liberty Park PDTND to set forth the terms and conditions to which they have agreed with respect to the matters contained herein; NOW, THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the premises described herein and the sum of TEN DOLLARS ($10.00) and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged by both parties, the County and the Developer do hereby covenant, stipulate, and agree as follows: 1. Recitals Incorporated: The foregoing recitals are incorporated as if fully restated herein. 2. Developer representations: A. Developer represents that Phase 1 A of the Liberty Park PDTND will consist of up to 128 homes to be located south of Sebastian River Improvement District R -13E drainage ditch, east of 70th Avenue, and north of 81st. Street, together with additional non-residential lands as shown and described on Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made apart hereof. B. At the time Developer elects to develop Phase IB of Liberty Park PDTND, it will consist of up to 31 residential units and it will be located north of the Sebastian River Improvement District R -13E drainage ditch, and at that 269 time Developer shall, in conjunction with said development, design, permit, and construct 70th Avenue as a two lane roadway for a distance of 1320 +/- feet from Sebastian River Improvement District R13 -E to CR 510 , in compliance with design plans and standards which have been approved by Indian River County. 81" Street Construction: In conjunction with the development of Phase IA of Liberty Park PDTND, the Developer will design, permit, and construct 81" Street from its current terminus at Liberty Park School to 70th Avenue. All road construction shall be in compliance with design plans and standards which have been approved by Indian River County through the County's right-of-way permitting process in accordance with Chapter 312 of the Indian River County Code of Ordinances. Upon completion of construction, this section of 81St Street shall be dedicated to the County for use as a public street. The County shall not be responsible for the maintenance of any landscaping or irrigation installed by the Developer in the County right-of-way. If the Developer installs landscaping and/or irrigation in the County right-of-way, a Memo of Understanding (MOU) will be required before permitting of said improvements. 70t' Avenue Construction: In conjunction with the Development of Phase 1- B and 1 A of Liberty Park PDTND, Developer will design, permit, and construct 70th Avenue from 81St Street to the Sebastian River Improvement District RI 3E drainage ditch. All road construction shall be in compliance with design plans and standards which have been approved by Indian River County through the County's right-of-way permitting process in accordance Chapter 312 of the Indian River County Code of Ordinances. Upon completion of construction, this section of 70th Avenue shall be dedicated to the County for use as a public street. In conjunction with Development of Phase 1B of Liberty Park PDTND, the Developer will design, permit and construct 70th Avenue from the Sebastian River Improvement District R13E drainage ditch to County Road (CR) 510. If CR 510 remains unimproved (not widened to 4 -lane divided section) at the time the Developer proposes to construct 701h Avenue between SRID R13E drainage ditch and CR 510, the Developer will be responsible for the cost to design and construct a.temporary span wire traffic signal, if warranted by a Traffic Impact Study. Should CR 510 be improved consistent with the FD.OT planned PD&E improvements (4 -lane divided section) prior to the Developer moving forward with the 70th Avenue improvements between SRID R13E and CR 510, it is anticipated that a traffic signal will have been constructed at CR 510 and Power Line Road (70th Avenue) intersection in conjunction with the FDOT proposed the widening that could be utilized. The County shall not be responsible for the maintenance of any landscaping or irrigation installed by the Developer in the County right-of-way. If the Developer installs landscaping and/or irrigation in the County right-of-way, a Memo of Understanding (MOU) will be required before permitting of .said improvements. Should the Developer propose an alternative development plan, the Developer may submit a Traffic Impact Study supporting the plan evaluating alternative transportation routes/improvements 270 that may demonstrate other off-site improvements in lieu of a temporary traffic signal at the 70th Avenue/CR 510 intersection. 5. Chanted Condition: The parties acknowledge that Condition 7.b. of the October 28, 2008 Liberty Park approval letter required the Developer to complete a sidewalk on the south side of County Road 510 between 64th Avenue and 66th Avenue. The parties further acknowledge that due to plans by the Florida Department of Transportation ("FDOT") to widen County Road 510 to a four -lane road any sidewalk construction by the Developer in compliance with this condition prior to the construction of Phase IA would be destroyed by the FDOT County Road 510 construction project. Therefore, the parties agree that this condition is waived. 6. Rvall Stormwater Park: The Ryall Stormwater Park Tract is depicted on Exhibit "A" hereto as Parcels D1 and D2. At the time the Developer elects to construct a lake or Stormwater management on the Ryall Stormwater Park Tract, Developer agrees to incorporate sufficient capacity to provide stormwater treatment for the impervious area for the right-of-way of 66th Avenue from 81St Street to 85th Street in its four lane improved condition and 81St Street located east of 66th Avenue in its three lane improved condition, and Developer shall dedicate a non-exclusive easement to the County for access and maintenance purposes. If the County elects to proceed with widening or other improvements of 66th Avenue before Developer elects to construct a lake or stormwater management pond on the Ryall Stormwater Park Tract, then the County shall be responsible for all costs associated with the design, permitting, and construction of drainage improvements for 66th Avenue between 81St Street and 85th Street, and Developer agrees to provide a suitable location within Parcels D 1 and D2 to permit the County to construct a temporary stormwater facility, provided, however, the Developer shall have the right to review and approve the plans for any such Facilities construction. If constructed by the County, the Developer.shall have the right to modify the Stormwaters Facilities so long as the 66th Avenue stormwater volumes are not compromised. Within 60 -days from the date of this Agreement, the Developer agrees to grant a temporary non-exclusive easement for access, construction, maintenance and use of the temporary stormwater facility located on Parcels D1 and D2. In any case, whether constructed by the County or by the Developer, all fill dug or removed from the Ryall Stormwater Park Tract shall remain the property of the Developer for use by the Developer in conjunction with development of Liberty Park PDTND. The County shall be- allowed the use 10,000 cubic yards of material for the construction of 66th Avenue at no cost to the County. The Developer shall store this material at a location of Developer's choosing near the east side of 66th Avenue near 81St. Street. The Developer shall provide a 50 - foot temporary non -.exclusive easement for access, construction, and maintenance on both sides of the Sebastian River Improvement District R13E drainage ditch west from 66th Avenue to the existing SRID drainage ditch for construction of the portion of the drainage ditch that currently does not exist in 271 the SRID right-of-way, but is necessary for discharge of the stormwater facility to be constructed on Parcel D1 and D2. 7. Parcel B: Developer proposes to develop Parcel B, as depicted on Exhibit A hereto, in a subsequent phase of development of Liberty Park PDTND. Parcel B shall have its own drainage system; provided however, County agrees that the drainage system for Parcel B shall be permitted to outfall to the 66th Avenue stormwater management conveyance system, which will then drain into the Ryall Stormwater Park Tract 8. Phase 1A Plat Dedications: By final plat of Phase lA of the Liberty Park PDTND, Developer shall dedicate to the County, without cost to the County the following: i. 81St Street, adjacent to the project. ii. 70th Avenue from 81St Street to Sebastian River Improvement District R -13E drainage ditch. 9. Right -of -Way Dedications for 66th Avenue: Within 60 -days from the date of this Agreement, the Developer agrees, at no cost to the County, to dedicate all right-of-way for 66th Avenue between 81St Street and County Road 510, and all right-of-way on 81St Street east of 66th Avenue as depicted in Exhibit `B". 10. Developer will design, permit, and excavate an extension of the Sebastian River Drainage District D13E drainage ditch from 691h Avenue eastward for a distance of 1,300 feet, more or less ("SR DD Ditch D13E Work"). If the .Developer has not begun the. SRDD Ditch D13E work at the time the County 66th Avenue roadway widening project between 69th and 85th Street begins construction, the Developer authorizes the County to design, permit, and/or excavate the necessary improvement. Developer and county shall each be responsible for %2 of all costs associated with SR DD Ditch D13E Work. 11. Miscellaneous Provisions: A. In the event of any litigation arising out of this Agreement, the prevailing party shall recover attorney's fees and costs from the non -prevailing party. B. This Agreement and all matters arising hereunder shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Florida. Venue hereunder shall lie in Indian River County, Florida. C. The obligations of the Developer to this Agreement are expressly conditioned upon the Developer's decision, at the Developer's sole discretion, to proceed with development of the Liberty Park PTDND. 272 E. This Agreement shall be deemed prepared jointly by each of the parties hereto and shall be construed on parity as between the parties. There shall be no canon of construction for or against any party by reason of the physical preparation of this Agreement. F. Whenever the singular number is used in this Agreement and when required by the context, the same shall include the plural; and the masculine, feminine, and neuter genders shall each include the others. G. The parties shall grant such further assurances and provide such additional documents as may be reasonably required by one another from time to time, and cooperate fully with one another in order to carry out the terms and conditions hereof and comply with the express intention of this Agreement. H. Failure to insist upon strict compliance with any of the terms, covenants, or conditions herein shall not be deemed a waiver of such terms, covenants, or conditions, nor shall any waiver or relinquishment of any right or power hereunder at any one time or times be deemed a waiver or relinquishment of such right or power at any other time or times. I. All words, terms, and conditions contained herein are to be read in concert each and with the other, and a provision contained under one paragraph may be considered to be equally applicable under another in the interpretation of this Agreement. J. In the event any term, condition, or clause of this Agreement is declared to be illegal. or unenforceable by a court of competent jurisdiction, such declaration of illegality or unenforceability shall not affect or alter the legality or enforceability of any remaining term, condition, or clause hereof, provided same does not frustrate the intention of the parties, as set forth in this Agreement. This Agreement may. be executed in any number of duplicate originals and any such duplicate original shall be deemed to constitute one and the same instrument. . (Signature pages to follow) 273 RYALL DEVELOPMENT GROUP, LLC, a Florida limited liability company By: Print Name: Its: WITNESS: WITNESS: (Corporate seal is acceptable in place of witnesses) 274 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA ATTEST: Deputy Clerk (SEAL) Approved as to form -and legal sufficiency: INDIAN RIVER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS IM Joseph E Flescher, Chairman Date approved: Approved William K. DeBraal Jason E. Brown Deputy County Attorney County Administrator 275 276 Exhibit 'B' Parcel 133 -197,411 Sq. Ft. - 4.53 t.4.53 Acres 81st Street 277 Parcel 139 762 Sq. Ft. 0.94 Acres Oouglas Subdivision 1"= 300, Parcel 136 31,808 Sq. FL 0.73 Acres c Q 83rd Street t0 Parcel 135 71,358 Sq. Ft. I 1.64 Acres _ d4. W Parcel 134 m N a13,200 C4 CO Sq. Ft 0.30 Aore's Liberty Park P.U.D. n. "0 0 m 66th Avenue Right of Way Dedication Parcel 133 -197,411 Sq. Ft. - 4.53 t.4.53 Acres 81st Street 277 I.EF I. April 20, 2021 ITEM 14.E.1 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS INTER -OFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: Members of the Board of County Commissioners DATE: April 14, 2021 SUBJECT: Geohydrology — Updated Survey FROM: Laura Moss Commissioner, District 5 Discussion Item: Our having had the benefit of the Indian River Soil & Water Conservation District meeting on 04/12/2021, let us discuss updating our County's geohydrology study. Kindly refer to Indian River County 2030 Comprehensive Plan (adopted 10/12/2010) Chapter 3D, Natural Groundwater Aquifer Recharge Sub -Element, Objective 2, Preserving the Quantity of the Surficial Aquifer, Policy 2.6: "By 2011, the county shall contact the U.S. Geological Survey and request an updated county -wide geohydrologic survey". Staff has supplied the most recent document in this regard, "Geohydrology of Indian River County, Florida", dated 1988. Attached for your convenience are the aforementioned references: 1) Indian River County 2030 Comprehensive Plan Chapter 3D, Natural Groundwater Aquifer Recharge Sub -Element, "Goal, Objectives and Policies" 1 through 5; "Plan Implementation"; "Evaluation &Monitoring Procedures"; Tables 3.1 and 3.2. 2) "Geohydrology of Indian River County, Florida", U.S. Geological Survey, 1988. r Indian River County 2030 Comprehensive Pian Indian River County. Community Development Department Adopted: October 12, 2010 279 Comprebensive Plan Natural Groundwater A uifer Recha b - GOALS OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES GOAL To protect the function of natural groundwater aquifer recharge areas, to prevent the contamination of groundwater and to extend the life span of the county's aquifers through water conservation. OBJECTIVE 1 Protection of Water Quality Through 2020, there will be no instances of contamination of groundwater aquifers or public supply wells within the county. For the purpose of this objective, water quality will be based on primary and secondary maximum contaminant levels (MCLs), as defined by the FDEP in Chapter 17-550, F.A.C. ,Policy 1.1:. By 2010, the county shall update the Surficial Primary Recharge Overlay District (SAPROD) map using a geographic information systems (GIS) format. Policy 1.2: By 20I2, the county will assist the SJRWMD and FDEP in developing a Wellhead Protection Area (WHPA) map for Indian Ri ver County by providing the following information: ➢ the location of existing public wellheads; ➢ the proposed location of future public wellheads; and, ➢ potential conflicts between existing and future land uses and public wellhead protection areas. The WPHA map will be compatible with the county's G.I.S. database. Policy 1.3: The county shall continue to prohibit the location of septic systems within two hundred feet of a public water supply well, unless- otherwise approved by the FDEP or HRS. Policy 1..4: The county, through its stormwater .permitting processes, shall ensure that storrrtwaiter management structures, except those located within the SAPROD, are designed to function as aquifer recharge areas. Poli 1.: The county shall continue to protect existing and future public water supply wells from contamination .by continuing to implement Chapter 931 of the County's land development regulations and by prohibiting any non-residential land use which stores, handles, or produces a toxic degradation or petroleum-based product, or any substance regulated under 40 CFR 302,40 CFR 122.21, and/or Chapter 487, F.S. from locating within 1,000 feet of a public water supply well; . The minimum radial separation distances for land uses and structures from public wellhead regulated areas are as follows: Community Development Department Indian River County 12 280 Comprehensive Plan Natural Groundwater Aquifer Recharge S&Element ➢ 200 feet for on-site disposal systems, unless approved by the FDEP or DHRS; ➢ 300 feet for wet retention/detention areas, unless approved by the SJRWMD; ➢ 500 feet for landfill and/or transfer stations, above ground or underground storage ➢ tanks, feed lots and animal facilities, and WWTP eilluent discharges, unless approved by the FDEP; ➢ 1,000 for any mining and/or excavation of waterways or drainage facilities which intersect the water table. Policy 1.6. The county shall prohibit new developments or changes of uses that produce hwardous materials from locating on the Atlantic Coastal Sand Ridge or the Ten Mile Ridge areas of Indian River County. Policy 1.7: The county shall continue to prohibit injection wells for the disposal of wastewater. Policy 1.8: The county, in cooperation with the Indian River Soil and Water Conservation District (IRSWCD), shall discourage the use of flood irrigation with water from the Floridan aquifer by providing incentives for low volume irrigation systems. OBJECTIVE 2 Preserving the Quantity of the Surficial Aquifer Through 2025, there will be no reduction in the availability of groundwater from the surficial aquifer. For the purpose of this objective, water quantity will be based on SJRWMD's most recent regional groundwater model. otic 2.1: The county shall implement water conservation measures, as designated in the policies under Objective 4 of the Potable Water Sub- Element and Objective 4 of the Sanitary Sewer Sub -Element, to protect the surficial aquifer from depletion. Policy -2.2: , The county shall use natural groundwater aquifer recharge areas for passive paries and open space. Policy 2.3.;To:ensure preservation of the surficial aquifer, the county shall continue to issue permits for all proposed excavation/mining projects in the unincorporated county that are exempt from SJRWMD permitting requirements. For proposed excavation/mining projects that are located along the Atlantic Coastal Sand Ridge and are exempt from SJRWMD permitting requirements, the county shall prohibit the following: ➢ excavation within 1,000 feet of a public supply wellfield; D excavation within 1,000 feet of any platted subdivision not serviced by potable water; and, D excavation that results in an average elevation less than.25 feet above mean sea level. Commuetty Development Department Indian River County 13 281 Comprehensive Plan!:. Natural Groundwater AguirerRecharge Sn"lement. Po 'c 2.4:. The county shall preserve the aquifer recharge function of palustrine, wetlands by adopting the Comprehensive Wetlands MmRagement Program, as described in the Conservation Element. Policy 2.5 The county will require all wet detention/retention ponds with a surface area greater than one (1) acre be designed to utilize stormwater runoff for irrigation. Policy 2.6:. By 2011, the county shall contact the U.S. Geological Survey and request an updated county -wide geohydrologic survey. OBJECTIVE 3 Preserving the Quantity of the Floridan Aquifer Through 2025, there will be no reduction in the availability of groundwater from the Floridan aquifer: For the purpose of this objective, Floridan aquifer quantity will be based on SJRWMD's most recent regional groundwater model. ;Policy 3.1.: The county shall protect and preserve open space in the west portion of the county, which has been identified as a natural groundwater aquifer recharge area for the Floridan aquifer, by designating those areas for agricultural use with a very low residential density, as depicted on the future Iand use map. .Policy 3.2: The county shall coordinate with the SJRWMD and the iRSWCD to encourage the We of lot; volume irrigation systems to prevent over pumping from the Floridan aquifer. Policy 3.3: The county shall continue to require that new developments install a minirnum of 50% wafer -conserving xeriscape plant material, as specified in the Landscape ordinance. Policy 3.4: The county shall reuse 100% of treated wastewater effluent for irrigation to prevent over pumping of the Floridan aquifer. Policy 5 . the county shall, depending on funding availability, renew its annual contract with the SJRWMD to identify and plug or repair abandoned free flowing artesian wells. Policy 3.6: The county shall implement the policies of Potable Water Sub -Element Objective 8. Community Development Department Indian River County 14 282 ComQteheushePlan __ Natural Groundwater Aquifer- RechargeSub-Eietent OBJECTIVE 4 Intergovernmental Coordination By 2012, Indian River County will bave written intergovernmental coordination agreements with local governments and. state agencies to ensure protection of the natural groundwater aquifer system. Policy 4.1: The county shall cooperate with agencies, such as the SJRWMD and the FDEP, in, performing assessments of groundwater resources, and shall review any recommendations for incorporation into the land development regulations. County support shall include, but not be limited to, providing information, providing staff assistance, and implementing recommendations. Policy 4.2: The county shall assist the SJRWMD with updating SJRWMD's water supply assessments by providing water use data relating to agricultural irrigation, recreational irrigation, and public supply. Policy 4.3:.,The county will assist the SJRVVbM in coordinating with the other counties to the west and northwest of Indian River County to protect the natural groundwater aquifer recharge areas of the Floridan aquifer by maintaining a very low land use density in these areas, compatible with densities identified in the Indian River County future land use map.. Policy 4.4: The county shall continue to utilize existing interlocal agreements with other local governments, as identified in table 11.3 of the Intergovernmental Coordination Element, to ensure maximum efficiency of water management, by combining resources and eliminating duplication. OBJECTIVE 5. Capital Improvements By 2015, the County shall protect a minimum of 100.0 additional acres of aquifer recharge areas for the surficial aquifer through conservation easements and fee simple acquisition compared to 2009 baseline data. Policy 5.1: The county will maintain a 5 year schedule of capital improvement needs for public facilities, to be updated annually in conformance with the review process for the Capital Improvements Element of this plan. Policy --5.2e The county shall pursue state and federal sources of funding available for the preservation and protection of environmentally sensitive areas, such as natural groundwater aquifer recharge areas: Community Development Department Indian River County 15 283 omnreheasive Plan w.: .. _. Natural Groundwater Aaulfer Recharee Sob-ElMo—I lic . .3 The county shall evaluate and rank proposed capital improvement projects for the acquisition and preservation of the natural groundwater aquifer recharge areas according to the following guidelines. Level One • Whether the acquisition is needed to protect public health, to protect the function of aquifer recharge, and to fulfill the county's legal commitment to provide water services: ➢ Level Two - Whether the acquisition will improve the existing condition and prevent or reduce future capital costs. Poli _5.4: The county shall continue to monitor water quality at county water treatment and wastewater treatment plants. Community Development Department Indian Rlvcr County 16 284 Comnrehensive Plan Natural Groundwater Aguifer Recharge Sub-&Jimint PLAN IMPLEMENTATION An important part of any plan is its implementation. Implementation involves execution of the plan's policies by taking actions and achieving results. For the, Natural Groundwater Aquifer Recharge Sub -Element, implementation involves various activities. While some of these actions will be ongoing, others are activities that will be taken by certain points in time. For. each policy in this element, Table 3.1 identifies the type of action required, the entity or entities responsible for taking the action, the timing, and whether or not the policy, necessitates a capital expenditure. To implement the Natural Groundwater Aquifer Recharge Sub -Element, several types of action musttbe taken. 'These include, but are not limited to: revisions to land development regulations and ordinances, intergovernmental coordination, and provision of funding. Overall plan implementation responsibility will rest with the planning department. Besides its responsibilities as identified in Table 3. 1, the planning department has the additional responsibility of ensuring that other entities discharge their responsibilities. This will entail notifying other applicable departments of capital expenditures to be included in their budgets; notifying other departments. and groups of actions that must be taken, and assisting other departments and agencies in their plan implementation responsibilities. Jver County 17 285 Comnrehenstve.Plan Natural Groundwater.Aguirer RechaMeSnh-Elgment EVALUATION & MONITORING PROCEDURES To be effective, a plan must provide a means for implementation and a mechanism for assessing the plan's effectiveness. Generally, a plan's effectiveness can be judged by the degree to which the plan's objectives have been met. Since objectives are structured, to be measurable and to have specific timeframes, the plan's objectives are the benchmarks used as a basis to evaluate the plan. Table 3.2 identifies each. of the objectives of the Natural Groundwater Aquifer Recharge. Sub -Element and the measures used to evaluate progress in achieving the objectives. Table 3.2 also identifies an anticipated date of completion for each objective. ?he planning department staff will be responsible for monitoring and evaluating the Natural Groundwater Aquifer Sub -Element. This will involve compilation of information, when available, regarding groundwater quantity and quality. While monitoring will occur on a periodic. basis, formal evaluation of the Natural Groundwater Aquifer Recharge Sub -Element will occur every five. (5) years in conjunction with the Evaluation and Appraisal of the Comprehensive Plan. Besides assessing progress, the Evaluation and Appraisal Report (EAR) will also be used to determine if the Natural Groundwater Aquifer Recharge Sub -Elements objectives and policies should be maintained, revised or deleted. in this way, the monitoring and evaluation of the Natural Groundwater Aquifer Recharge Sub -Element will provide a means of determining the degree ofsuecess of the plan's implementation, as well as, providing a mechanism for evaluating needed changes to the Sub -Element, Community Development Department Indian River County 18 286 Corngrebensive Plan Natural Groundwater Aguiter Rechamt, SukEJem&6r TABLE 3.1 NATURAL GROUNDWATER AQUIFER RECHARGE SUB -ELEMENT IMPLEMENTATION MATRIX Polity Typt of Action 1,1 Update SAPROD inep to 01S. format I1 Assist in developing WHPA map 13 . Restrict location of septic tanks 1.4 Stormwater management strueturedesign 13 Continue enforcing LDR Chapter 931 to protect public supply wellheads 1.6. Reztriet hazardous materials in NOAR eras 1.7 Prohibit new injection wells I.8 Discourage flood irrigation Implement Objective 4 of the Potable Water Sub, 2.1 Element and Objective 4 of the Sanitary Sewer Sub - Element 2.2 Use NGAR areas for parks and open space 2.3 Continue to issue permits for proposed mining prujecucxempthomSJRMWD regulations 24 Adopi Comprcheasive Wetlands Management Program 25 Require all stormwelcr ponds over I acre to utilize runoff for irrigation 2.6 Obtain updated county -wide geahydrolic survey 3.1 Preserve open space in the western county 3.2 Encourage use of low volume irrigation 3.3 Require 50% xeriscape for new developments 3.4 Reuse 100% of treated wastewster effluent 3.S PlugImpair abandoned flow wells 3.6 Implement politics of Potable Water Sub4Etement Objective 8 4.1 CoordinstelProvide assistance Community Development Department Community Dmelopment 2010 Carnrnunity DevclopmentNtilitics 2012 DEPlDHiiS _ Ongoing Public works Ongoing Community Derciopmen t Ongoing Community Development Ongoing iRSWCD Ongoing Community DevelopmenVCity of V11 Ongoing Utflities/SAWMD Community Development/ Ongoing Public Works Commwiry Ongoing Dtvdopm...1"p Community Developmeaf Ongoing F.S. 298 Disuictt/ SJRWMD/MSWCD/Public Ongoing Works Community Development/ 2015 Public works Community Development Ongoing MSWCD/SJRWMD Ongoing Community Development Ongoing, IRC Utilities Dept/ City of Ongoing VB Utilities Community Development/SJRWMD Ongoing Community Ongoing DevcloptntnVPnblic Worsts SJRWMD/MP/IRC Ongoing, tai l;ttpenattnro NO NO MU NO NO NO NO YES a 2E NO T!O NO YES YES YES NO Indian River County 19 287 Comprebensive Plan Natural Groundwater Aquifer<Recharg Element. 0.2 Provido water use dais 10 the SJRMWD SAMWD/Utilities Dept. Ongoing NO 4.3 InWffovernme W eoordinatim SIRMWD Ongoing NO 4.4 lntet.locaiagreorsin SCCISJRWMD!ts Municipalitiosi Ongoing N10. 11 Maintain 5 year schedule nfespiW improvanausapt Utilities DOW FbanceS Aoarml YES 2 Parsne state end "ret funding atnwes Cctataunity Development . OpgQing .... NO 5.3 CIP Evaluatioamlioridwioa F Utes Dew Dept Oo@ow" mg NO 5.4 Monitw water quality et county water haAmt and DEPBJRWMDlDHRS! One* %% tewaft etatrrmt plants Utrlibes< Dept SCC: Board of County Commissioners DEP: Florida Dtpar9aent of Etrvitorunextat Proteotian SJRWMD: St Johns River Water lvimregpa entDistrta IRSWCD. Indian River Soil and Water Conservation Dstria DHRS: Florida Dcpufttnt ofHealtb and JtehWIdative Services (Environmental Health) Community Development Department Indian River County 20 288 Comprehensive Plan N2tu-qj Groundwa er, Warm Sub -Element TABLE 3.2 NATURAL GROUNDWATER AQUIFER RECHARGE SUB -ELEMENT EVALUATION MATRIX BJFICTIVE MEASURE TTKEFRAME No instances of contamination of groundwater 2020 aquifas or public supply wells, based on primary and secondary MCLS, as defined by the FDEP Availability of groundwater from the surficial 2025 a tui f q er 3 Availability of groundwater from the Floridan 2025 aquifer, 4 Inter -governmental coordination mechanisms 2012 5 Amount of natural groundwater aquifer recharge 2015 areas preserved FACommunity DeYdopmen(%Usys%ndy sokzakXC0mP1dr1fts1N0WR.4oc Community Development Department Indian River County 21 289 GEOHYDROLOGY OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA By G.R. Schiner and C.P. Laughlin, U.S. Geological Survey and D.J. Toth, St. Johns River Water Management District U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Water -Resources Investigations Report 88-4073 Prepared in cooperation with the INDIAN RIVER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS and the ST. JOHNS RIVER WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT Tallahassee, Florida 1988 290 DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR DONALD PAUL HODEL, Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Dallas L. Peck, Director For additional information write to: District Chief U.S. Geological Survey Suite 3015 227 North Bronough Street Tallahassee, Florida 32301 Copies of this report can be purchased from: U.S. Geological Survey Books and Open -File Reports Section Federal Center, Building 810 Box 25425 Denver, Colorado 80225 291 Page Abstract............................................................. 1 Introduction......................................................... 3 Background...................................................... 3 Purposeand scope............................................... 3 Studyapproach.................................................. 5 Acknowledgments................................................. 5 Well-numbering systems ........................................... 5 Geography............................................................ 8 Land forms and drainage......................................... 8 Landuse........................................................ 11 Climate......................................................... 11 General geohydrology of the ground-water system ...................... 15 Geologic framework.............................................. 15 Hydrogeologic framework......................................... 15 Ground-water occurrence and movement ............................ 20 Water quality ................................................... 23 Geohydrology of the surficial aquifer system ......................... 25 Hydrogeologic framework......................................... 25 Hydraulic properties............................................ 29 Description of wells that tap the system ........................ 32 Water levels.................................................... 33 Water levels in the Vero Beach well field ....................... 37 Recharge and discharge in the system ............................ 41 Waterquality................................................... 43 General.................................................... 43 Occurrence of chlorides.................................... 45 Occurrence of chlorides in the Vero Beach area............. 51 Potential development........................................... 56 Geohydrology of the Floridan aquifer system .......................... 56 Description of the hydrologic units ............................. 56 Hydraulic properties............................................ 59 Description of wells that tap the system ........................ 63 Potentiometric surface.......................................... 64 Water levels.................................................... 64 General.................................................... 64 Water-level trends......................................... 67 Waterquality................................................... 69 General.................................................... 69 Variations of chloride concentration in wells.............. 71 Distribution of chlorides.................................. 75 Trends in chloride concentrations .......................... 78 Effect of irrigation water from the Floridan aquifer system on the quality of canal water............. 81 Wateruse............................................................ 82 General......................................................... 82 Use of water from the Floridan aquifer system for public-water supply........................................... 84 Irrigation water use............................................ 84 Summary and conclusions.............................................. 85 Selected references .................................................. 91 Supplementary data I--Wells in the surficial aquifer system used for data analysis............................................. 94 Supplementary data II--Wells in the Floridan aquifer system used for data analysis............................................. 104 iii 292 FIGURES Page 1-5. Maps showing: 1. Indian River County --the study area.... ............... 4 2. Location of wells in the surficial aquifer system....... 6 3. Location of wells in the Floridan aquifer system........ 7 4, Land forms in Indian River County ...................... 9 5. Comparison of marsh areas in the Upper St, Johns River basin, (predevelopment (1900) and 1972 (from Campbell and others, 1984) ........................... 10 6-8. Graphs showing: 6. Annual rainfall at Vero Beach, 1943-85, and Fellsmere 1931-85 ..................................... 12 7. Monthly rainfall at Vero Beach, 1975-85, and Fellsmere 1975-85 .............................13 8. Annual rainfall and cumulative departure from monthly average rainfall at Blue Cypress Lake, 1979-85........ 14 9. Gamma -ray log of well 46F showing geologic formations and hydrologic units ....................................... 17 10-12. Hydrogeologic sections: 10. A -A' and B -B' showing components of the surficial aquifer system ........ .. .................. 18 11. I -I' and J -J' showing formations of the Floridan aquifer system ............................... 19 12. K -K' showing formations of the Floridan aquifer system ........................................ 20 13-14. Maps showing: 13. Thickness of the Hawthorn Formation (intermediate confining unit) ....................................... 21 14. Potentiometric surface, May 1981, and areas of natural recharge and discharge of the Upper Floridan aquifer ................................ 22 15-17. Graphs showing: 15. Classification of salinity and limiting concentrations of chloride recommended for plants, animals, public supply, and industrial use............ 24 16. Relation between chloride concentration and specific conductance .................................. 25 17. Relation between specific conductance and dissolved - solids concentration, and the classification ofsalinity of water .................................. 26 18-22. Maps showing: 18. Thickness of the surficial aquifer system ............... 27 19. Generalized thickness of the Tamiami Formation.......... 28 20. Specific capacity of wells completed in the surficial aquifer system and location of aquifer test sites in eastern Indian River County ............. 30 21. Specific capacity of wells completed in the surficial aquifer system and locations of production wells and monitor wells in the Vero Beach well field........ 31 22. Locations of wells in the surficial aquifer system for which hydrographs are shown, and lines of hydrogeologic section ................................. 34 23-24. Hydrographs showing: 23. Water level in wells 3165, 239S, and 134S ............... 35 24. Water level in wells 1515 and 217S ...................... 36 iv 293 FIGURES --Continued Page 25-26. Maps showing: 25. Potentiometric surface of the surficial aquifer system in the Vero Beach well field, May 1981......... 38 26. Potentiometric surface of the surficial aquifer system in the Vero Beach well field, May 1984......... 39 27-30. Graphs showing: 27. Water level and chloride concentration of water in well 1215 in the Vero Beach well field, 1981-85....... ...................................... 40 28. Monthly pumpage from the Vero Beach well field, 1975-85 ................................... 40 29. Water level and chloride concentration of water in well 100S, and stage of Main Canal, 1980-84........ 41 30. Water level and chloride concentration of water in well 145S, and monthly rainfall at Vero Beach, 1980-85 ........................................ 42 31-33. Maps showing: 31. Chloride concentrations in water from wells completed in the shallow rock zone (depths greater than 75 feet), 1982-83 ........................ 46 32. Chloride concentrations in water from wells completed in the clastic zone (depths between 40 and 75 feet), 1982-83 ...................... 47 33. Location of lines of chloride sections .................. 48 34-35. Sections showing chloride concentrations in water and depth of wells in the surficial aquifer system along lines of section: 34. C -C' and D -D'. ........................................ 49 35. E -E' and F -F............................................ 50 36. Section showing chloride concentration in water and depth of wells in the surficial and Floridan aquifer systems along line of section G -G' (line of section shown in fig. 33) .......................................... 51 37. Section showing chloride concentration in water and depth of wells in the surficial aquifer system along line of section H -H' (line of section shown in fig. 33).... 52 38. Graph showing chloride concentrations in water from three salinity observation wells, 1979-84 .................. 53 39-44. Maps showing: 39. Chloride concentrations in water from wells that tap the surficial aquifer system in the Vero Beach well field, June 1981 ...................... 54 40. Chloride concentration in water from wells that tap the surficial aquifer system in the Vero Beach well field, June 1984 ...................... 55 41. Altitude of the top of the Floridan aquifer system and western limit of the Suwannee Limestone........... 57 42. Specific capacity of wells completed in the Floridan aquifer system and location of aquifer testsites .........:................................. 60 43. Potentiometric surface of the Upper Floridan aquifer, May 1981 ..................................... 65 44. Potentiometric surface of the Upper Floridan aquifer, May 1983, and predevelopment surface (estimated)...... 66 v 294 FIGURES --Continued vi 295 Page 45-46. Hydrographs showing: 45. Month-end water levels in well 23F (USDA South Well 43rd Avenue), 1959-84 ................................. 68 46. Water level in well 168F (USGS Observation Well IR 189), 1976-85... ................. 69 47. Map showing locations of wells in the Floridan aquifer system for which hydrographs are shown, and lines of hydrogeologic section.........................................70 48. Graph showing chloride concentrations in water from continuously flowing and aperiodically flowing wells....... 72 49. Sketch showing hypothetical paths of ground -water movement in wells that penetrate both the Upper and Lower Floridan aquifer ........................... 74 50-52. Maps showing chloride concentrations in water from: 50. Wells that tap the Upper Floridan aquifer ............... 76 51. Wells that tap the Upper and the Lower Floridanaquifer ...................................... 77 52. 26 wells that tap the Floridan aquifer system for the periods 1951-52, 1968-71, and 1983-84 ................. 79 53-54. Graphs showing: 53. Specific conductance of water in South Canal at 43rd Avenue and precipitation at Vero Beach........... 82 54. Annual pumpage by the city of Vero Beach, 1954-84....... 83 TABLES Page 1. Water -bearing characteristics and descriptions of the geologic units in Indian River County .................... 16 2. Aquifer -test results for the surficial aquifer system at four sites in Indian River County ..................... 32 3. Water levels in wells in the clastic zone and shallow rockzone ................................................ 43 4. Representative analyses and ranges in concentrations of constituents in water from wells'completed in the clastic and shallow rock zones of the surficial aquifer system ................................. 44 5. Transmissivities of the Floridan aquifer system at five sites in Indian River County ........................ 61 6. Specific capacity test data of selected wells that tap the Floridan aquifer system .............................. 62 7. Ground -water levels at selected sites in Indian.River and Highlands Counties, 1934, 1951, 1971, and 1984....... 71 vi 295 GEOHYDROLOGY OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA By G.R. Schiner and C.P. Laughlin, U.S. Geological Survey; and D.J. Toth, St. Johns River Water Management District ABSTRACT The surficial aquifer system and the underlying Floridan aquifer system are the sources of all ground water used in Indian River County, Florida. The surficial aquifer system consists of a 100- to 150 -foot -thick section of unconsolidated clastic deposits termed the "clastic zone" that overlies a 0- to 60 -foot -thick section of mostly indurated carbonate rock termed the "shallow rock zone." The Floridan aquifer system consists of about 2,800 feet of carbonate rocks, subdivided on the basis of perme- ability, into the Upper Floridan aquifer (about 350-650 feet thick), the middle semiconfining unit (about 20-120 feet thick), and the Lower Floridan aquifer (roughly 2,000 feet thick). The surficial and Floridan aquifer systems are separated by a 100- to 200 -foot -thick low permeability rock unit known as the intermediate confining unit. Transmissivi ties of the surficial aquifer system range from 1,500 to 11,000 ft2 /d (feet squared per day). Specific capacities range from 21 to 70 (gal/min)/ft (gallons per minute per foot) in eastern Indian River County, and range from 9 to 36 (gal/min)/ft in the Vero Beach well field. Pumpage in the Vero Beach well field approximately doubled during the 10 -year period from I975 to 1985 and peaked at about 9.5 Mga1/d (million gallons per day) in the spring of 1981, during a major drought. A com- parison of water levels in the Vero Beach well field area between April 1971 and May 1984 indicates a decline of about 15 to 19 feet since 1971. Chloride concentrations in water from most wells that tap the surficial aquifer system in the Vero Beach well field have changed little in recent time. Between 1976 and 1983, the average chloride concentration in six production wells increased about 36 mg/L (milligrams per liter). However, chloride concentrations were unchanged in four others. The increase in chloride concentrations is probably related to the increase in well field pumpage from 5.44 Mgal/d in 1976 to 8.00 Mga1/d in 1983. High yielding wells completed in the surficial aquifer system are most likely to be found along the coastal ridge west of U.S. Highway 1 in the eastern part of the county. About 65 percent of all ground water used in the county is from the Floridan aquifer system. The hydrology of the Floridan aquifer system is complex. Considerable variation in yield and water quality may be found in nearby wells of equal depth. The permeability of the Upper Floridan aquifer generally is higher than that of the Lower Floridan aquifer. 1 296 Transmissivities of the Upper Floridan aquifer estimated from computer model simulations range from about 65,000 ft2/d to 200,000 ft2/d. However, much higher transmissivities have been determined from aquifer tests at a few sites. One such aquifer test at an injection well completed in the so- called "Boulder Zone" of the Lower Floridan aquifer yielded a transmissivity of 1.5 X 106 ft2/d. Specific capacities of 37 wells in the Floridan aquifer system range from 1 to 200 (gal/min)/ft with a median of 67 (gal/min)/ft. Measured flow rates of wells that tap the Floridan aquifer system range from 30 to 2,000 gal/min (gallons per minute) with a median of 650 gal/min. Most wells completed in the Floridan aquifer system flow. In heavily pumped areas and during "dry" years, water levels in May are as much as 15 feet lower than the levels in September. Water levels in the more developed eastern part of Indian River County have declined about 16 to 24 feet in the 50-year period 1934 to 1984. In the less developed western part of the county, water levels have declined about 8 to 10 feet. The countywide decline is probably mostly due to regional pumping. The water-level data indicate no significant water-level decline since the early 1970's outside of local heavily pumped areas. Water from the Lower Floridan aquifer generally contains chloride and dissolved solids in concentrations that exceed 250 mg/L and 500 mg/L, respectively, but water from the Upper Floridan aquifer generally contains less than 250 mg/L chloride in much of the southwestern part of the county and in some areas along the Atlantic Coastal Ridge. High freshwater heads in the Floridan aquifer system (generally 10 to 30 feet above land surface) were, as of 1985, preventing saltwater in the Indian River, the Atlantic Ocean, and the saline aquifers that underlie the freshwater from migrating into the Floridan aquifer. The high heads also prevent contaminants on the land surface from moving downward into the Floridan aquifer system. In most of the county, chloride concentrations of wells that tap the Floridan aqui- fer system have not changed significantly in the 15-year period 1968-83. However, chloride concentrations in the water from two public-supply wells in the Floridan aquifer system at Vero Beach increased 35 and 60 percent in the past 6 and 9 years, respectively (1976 and 1979-85). About 35 percent of the total area of Indian River County is in agri- cultural use, of which about 75 percent is irrigated. Irrigation with- drawals from the Floridan aquifer system amounted to 30 Mga1/d and con- stituted 22 percent of the total water used for irrigation in in the county in 1984. Inventoried irrigation wells range in depth from 233 to 1,272 feet--median depth is 700 feet. Changes in land use are affecting the pattern of irrigation. Urban development is replacing groveland along sections of U.S. Highway 1 and State Road 60 where irrigation water use is decreasing. In 1984, about 8.5 Mgal/d of ground water were used for public supply in the county, mostly by Vero Beach. An additional 8 Mga1/d of ground water were used for domestic supply. In June 1985, the county-owned reverse osmosis treatment plant near Oslo has provided about 1 Mgal/d of water for public supply to its service area south and west of Vero Beach from two wells that tap the Floridan aquifer system. 2 297 INTRODUCTION Background_ The 1980 population of Indian River County (fig. 1) was about 60,000, an increase of 67 percent from the 1970 population of 36,000. The estimated 1985 population was about 76,000--a 300 percent increase in the 25 -year period 1960-85 (University of Florida, 1986, p. 37). By the year 2000, the population is expected to reach about 104,000. Most new residents in the county have settled in the coastal areas, and this trend will probably continue. The predicted large population growth in the near future will cause a substantial additional demand for water from the shallow water - bearing surficial aquifer system, which underlies the coastal area and supplies much of the freshwater for public and private use. To augment supplies from the surficial aquifer system, additional substantial with- drawals from the commonly salty, deeper part of the Floridan aquifer system will probably be made for conversion to freshwater by the reverse osmosis process. The surficial aquifer system and the Floridan aquifer system are the sources of all ground water used in Indian River County. The two systems contain ground water that ranges in salinity from fresh to brine. High chloride concentration is the chief water -quality problem in the county. Prior to this study, little was known about the severity of stress imposed on the surficial and Floridan aquifer systems since large develop- ments began in the 1970's. Drainage or diversion of surface water and changes in land use that accompany development may have altered the histor- ical water balance that existed in the past. The effect of saline water flood irrigation on the water quality of the surficial aquifer system was not known. High water levels, substantially above sea level, have historically kept saltwater in the coastal areas from moving laterally inland and in- filtrating the potable water zones in the Floridan aquifer system. However, excessive pumping and diminishing recharge caused by changing land use can lower water levels enough to cause salty water to move into both the surfi- cial and the Floridan aquifer systems. The water -resources information needed to assess the effects of these changes was either lacking or outdated, so a comprehensive and current framework of water -resources information was needed to allow orderly planning and management, and use of the resource. Purpose and Scope The purpose of this report is to describe the principal water -bearing and water -quality features of the surficial and Floridan aquifer systems. The report includes descriptions of the geology and geography as they relate to the geohydrology of the county. It contains information on the water quality and hydraulic properties of the surficial and Floridan aquifer systems and describes trends in water levels and chloride concentrations in the aquifer systems. 3 298 F - ON F^Mfn hMui1--rMnfn --1 Vi to dj' 0 0 N N 4 The section of the report describing the surficial aquifer system was prepared by D.S. Toth, St. Johns River Water Management; the section describing the Floridan aquifer system was prepared by Schiner and Laughlin of the U.S. Geological Survey. The description of the surficial aquifer system primarily describes the aquifer as it occurs in eastern Indian River County. This report includes data from reports and files of both of these agencies and from reports from other governmental agencies, and private consultants. Study Approach During this study, water levels were measured periodically in about 60 wells. Water -level recorders were installed on five new observation wells and reinstalled on two previously discontinued long-term observation wells. Wells were inventoried and well logs obtained from owners and drillers. Fifty-three geophysical well logs were run and 25 test wells were drilled. Specific capacity tests were run on 35 wells that tap the Floridan aquifer system. The water -quality characteristics of selected wells were determined and about 300 wells were sampled for chloride analysis. In addition, the existing water -quality data for about 125 wells were further analyzed. Wells sampled during the 1958 and 1975 studies were resampled for determination of chloride concentration. Specific conductance and field - determined chloride concentration measurements were periodically made at several sites on the canal system. Water -level and water -quality informa- tion provided by the city of Vero Beach was collated and analyzed. Figures 2 and 3 show, respectively, the locations of wells in the surficial aquifer system and Floridan aquifer system used for data analyses in this report. Data on the physical characteristics of the wells are given in the sections Supplementary Data I (surficial aquifer system) and Supplementary Data II (Floridan aquifer system) at the end of the report. Acknowledgments The authors gratefully acknowledge the assistance given by many organizations and individuals during the study. Valuable assistance was provided by Hillman Goff, Vero Beach Water and Sewer Department; and Art Chalacombe, Planning and Human Resources, Indian River County. McLaughlin Well Drilling contributed valuable data. Cooperation of the many well owners who permitted access to their wells for testing and measuring is greatly appreciated. Well -Numbering_ Systems Three numbering systems are used to identify wells in this report. A number of up to three digits is used to identify wells and test holes in illustrations and tables. In the text, the well number is suffixed by the letters "S" or "F" to indicate an inventoried well in the surficial aquifer system or a well in the Floridan aquifer system, respectively. A 15 -digit number based on latitude and longitude is used to identify wells in the U.S. Geological Survey data storage and retrieval systems. The St. Johns River Water Management District uses a similar identification system to the U.S. Geological Survey, using latitude and longitude as a primary identifier. 5 300 N io r) O It O LO 0 O 00 I V O i U') O t0 I OI 0 0 N N wl m O Q I U �._ PTL .... •::...• -• • W ;. I _ 3 I �z `� • % • • '00 `d1030SO W X Y w �� • O I v '• W . . •. O LLJ >� • U IO I + W _ U I V O i U') O t0 I OI 0 0 N N wl m O Q I U � W QJ I m 3 0 �z `� • '00 `d1030SO W X Y w I O O O O U') I- 0 0 N N 11 v 0 0 0 L c d aT a CL ,c a� E 4) N v 0 0 U 7 N Q) L C cn a� 3 0 c 0 0 0 I I N OL7 7 O M O N 0 b 00 0 r - C14 N O M iz The 15 -digit number is the customary ground -water site indentification system (GWSI) of the U.S. Geological Survey, providing a unique number for each station. The number consists of 15 digits, formed from the latitude and longitude of the station location. The first 6 digits denote the degrees, minutes, and seconds of latitude; the next 7 digits denote degrees (always 3 digits beginning with 0), minutes, and seconds of longitude; and the last 2 digits denote a sequential number for a station within a 1 -second grid. Once assigned, a site identification number does not change even though the locations determined by latitude and longitude may be revised later. The site identification number is the major vehicle used in placing and retrieving data from the U.S. Geological Survey's data management system, the National Water Data Storage and Retrieval (WATSTORE) System. GEOGRAPHY Land Forms and Drainage The major land forms in Indian River County evolved during Pleistocene time and are of two general types --extensive terraces, and much less com- monly, ridges. Terraces are steplike flatlands and scarps that were formed by ancient seas that stood at several levels. The ridges represent shore- line features such as offshore bars and relict beaches of the ancient seas. The shape of the land surface has been little modified since Pleistocene time. Figure 4 shows the major land forms found in Indian River County. The Silver Bluff terrace extends from the coast to the Atlantic Coastal Ridge. The terrace includes the Barrier Island and stands at altitudes ranging from about 0 to 10 feet. The Pamlico terrace extends from the eastern edge of the Atlantic Coastal Ridge inland about 24 miles to the western edge of the St. Johns Marsh at generally near the 25 -foot altitude. The St. Johns Marsh covers the western half of the Pamlico terrace. The Talbot terrace rises from the western edge of the St. Johns Marsh to altitudes that range from about 25 to 75 feet but is generally near the 50 -foot altitude. The ridges from west to east are the Barrier Island, the Atlantic Coastal Ridge, and the Ten -Mile Ridge. The Barrier Island is a ridge that represents an ancient offshore bar in a section of the Atlantic Coastal Ridge system. The ridge on the Barrier Island ranges in altitude from 0 to about 25 feet but generally is less than 10 feet. The low area between the Barrier Island and the Atlantic Coastal Ridge is an ancient lagoon now occupied by the Indian River. The Atlantic Coastal Ridge ranges in altitude from about 5 to 50 feet --mostly 20 to 30 feet. The Ten -Mile Ridge ranges in altitude from 25 to 30 feet, and stands roughly 10 feet above the underlying Pamlico terrace. Descriptions of the geologic history and modes of occur- rence of the terraces and ridges are given by Cooke (1945), MacNeil (1949), and White (1970). Much of the surface drainage of Indian River County has been drasti- cally modified since the 1900's and ongoing changes continue. Except for the Talbot terrace and the ridge areas, most of the county prior to develop- ment was marshland that drained northward. St. Johns Marsh comprised a large part of the headwaters of the St. Johns River. In recent decades, vast sections of the St. Johns Marsh and other marshy areas were diked, 8 303 I N 0 O 00 LO N 0 LO V) 0 d - 0 LO LO O M W:... »�::::::: Dim o T LPN,�� gP ® GE W I IoIPN PV �\O V I GpPs 0--o FW- P�l 0 O U Io I rn�E Q IW � RDOG 0 �E rJ _ L o / U 5 '12s, NNS�MPR o I o I o 0 I r 4, i., ( r. cn o 0 C4 m � �-.- .� S � O ►— 4 C2q,d `_ GE J Vl O ol 0 2 Q E C p U y Op V-1030so W X o `1 W O LO � 0 0 n n N N 9 O M channeled, and drained to accommodate agricultural use. A comparison of marsh areas in 1972 to predevelopment marsh areas (about 1900) is shown in figure 5. Natural drainage in the county is sparse, but the following natural features were present in 1985. South Prong Sebastian Creek, paralleling the western side of the Atlantic Coastal Ridge, is tributary to Sebastian Creek that empties into the Indian River west of Sebastian Inlet. Blue Cypress Creek and Padgett Branch flow into Blue Cypress Lake from the highland of the Talbot Terrace west of the lake. Blue Cypress Lake has a surface area of 10.2 mit (square miles) and has no defined natural outlet. Discharge from the northern end of the lake is controlled by a structure. A system of levees and drainage ditches that surround Blue Cypress Lake allows the adjacent land to be used for agriculture. i • O.1 A,NATIO N rsh pined marsh Mace water ►RMRt V14AF41 0 10 i I T l -1 n in 9n KII 1972 Figure S. --Comparison of marsh areas in the Upper St. Johns River basin, predevelopment (1900) and 1972 (from Campbell and others, 1984). 10 305 Presently (1985), most of the drainage in the county flows to the Indian River through a system of drainage ditches connected to three large east -trending canals that discharge into the river (fig. 1). Land Use Indian River County has an area of 549 mil. Land use in the county is closely related to its land forms (fig. 4). The Barrier Island and Atlantic Coastal Ridge are generally citrus groves, residential, and commercial developments. Prior to the 1970's, the Atlantic Coastal Ridge and Barrier Island were chiefly in citrus groves, but because of urban growth these groves are being replaced by residential and commercial developments, primarily along the major roadways --State Roads AlA and 60, and U.S. Highway 1 (fig. 1). The Pamlico terrace is generally either in agricultural use (citrus and some vegetable farming) or natural marshland. The Ten Mile - Ridge is mostly in citrus groves. Large tracts of the St. Johns Marsh have been drained for citrus and vegetable farming and for cattle rangeland. Recently (1982-85) some of the drained rangeland is being developed for citrus production. The Talbot terrace is generally rangeland or undeveloped. Climate The climate of Indian River County is classified as subtropical humid, characterized by long, warm, mostly wet summers and mild, generally dry winters. The average annual air temperature is about 73 °F. High afternoon temperatures frequently exceed 90 °F during the summer months. Most years have a few days of frost or freezing temperatures with winter temperatures lowest inland. Rainfall is unevenly distributed throughout the year. Summer rainfall is from local showers or thunderstorms that are random in occurrence. Winter rainfall is generally associated with large, cold, frontal -type air masses that move from the northern latitudes southward. These fronts cover large areas so winter rainfall is more widespread than the summer rains. Occasional tropical storms or hurricanes may add considerable amounts of rainfall to the yearly average total rainfall. About 60 percent of the annual rainfall occurs in the period June through October. National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration records indicate that rainfall is unevenly distributed areally within the county. Average yearly rainfall at Fellsmere (about 55 inches) is about 3 inches more than the average yearly rainfall at Vero Beach (about 52 inches). Annual rain- fall for a station at Blue Cypress Lake for the period 1979 through 1985 averaged about 49 inches. Rainfall data at Vero Beach, Fellsmere, and Blue Cypress Lake are shown in figures 6, 7, and 8. Drought conditions prevailed throughout Florida during parts of 1980 and 1981, causing a 2 -year deficiency of about 19 inches from the average yearly at Vero Beach. At Avon Park, in Highlands County (fig. 14), the 2 -year deficiency was about 26 inches. 11 306 :9 70 S, N w I 0 50 z z 40 J J Q z 30 Q CO 10 70 ,:.ff V) w I z 50 z 40 J J Q z 30 Q 20 10 E 1945 1950 1955 1960 1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1935 1940 1945 1950 1955 1960 1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 Figure 6. --Annual rainfall at Vero Beach, 1943-85, and Fellsmere, 1931-85. 12 307 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 N U) 2 W I Z 0 Z z J J L< 20 z 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 Monthly rainfall Monthly normal rainfall, 1941-70 1975 FELLSMERE Monthly rainfall Monthly normal rainfall, 1941-70 -hill 11111 1975 11976 11977 1197a 11979 ligao I 1981 11982 1983 11914 11985 Figure 7. --Monthly rainfall at Vero Beach, 1975-85, and Fellsmere, 1975-85. 13 UINI 80 70 60 N w I U 50 Z Z 40 J J Q Z 30 Q rr 20 10 0 w 14 z U 12 Z Z 10 w 8 x D 6 Q 4 a w 2 J Q C Li- z —2 Q w -4 Q -6 J D —8 M U —1Q BLUE CYPRESS LAKE Annual rainfall Average annual rainfall (1979-85) 1979 1980 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 Figure B. --Annual rainfall and cumulative departure from monthly average rainfall at Blue Cypress Lake, 1979-85. 14 309 GENERAL GEOHYDROLOGY OF THE GROUND -WATER SYSTEM Geologic Framework The availability and quality of ground water and surface water is closely related to the geologic framework that underlies Indian River County. Sedimentary rocks about 9,500 feet thick (Lloyd, 1985, p. 57) rest on a basement complex of pre -Mesozoic volcanic rock. The top 1,500 feet of sediments, significant to this study, are part of the Tertiary and Quaternary Systems that range in age from Eocene (oldest) to Holocene (youngest). The uppermost geologic deposits of the 1,500 -foot section consist of unconsolidated post -Miocene deposits of sand, sandy clay, shell material and thin carbonate sediments that average about 150 feet in thickness. In descending order, the deposits consist of undifferentiated Holocene deposits, the Fort Thompson and Anastasia Formations of Pleistocene age, and the Tamiami Formation of Pliocene age. The unconsolidated deposits are underlain by fine clastic rocks of the Miocene Hawthorn Formation that range in thickness from about 70 to 250 feet in most of the study area. The fine clastic rocks are in turn underlain by either Oligocene or Eocene carbonate rocks about 1,000 -feet thick that comprise the remainder of the 1,500 -foot section. In descending order, the unit consists of the Suwannee Limestone, the Ocala Limestone, and the Avon Park Formation. Descriptions of the geologic formations penetrated by wells in Indian River County are given in table 1. An interpretation of the subsurface geology, indicated by distinctive features of the gamma -ray log of well 46F, is shown in figure 9. (For location of well 46F, see fig. 47.) The hydro - geologic sections shown in figures 10, 11, and 12 indicate the thickness and extent of the geologic units located in the eastern part of the study area. (See figs. 22 and 47 for location of lines of section.) Hydrogeologic Framework The hydrogeologic framework, through which ground water moves and is stored, in the study area consists of two general types of rock units -- consolidated carbonate rocks and the overlying unconsolidated rock. Each rock type contains aquifers with unique water -bearing properties that determine its utility as a source of water supply. The unconsolidated deposits contain the surficial aquifer system, commonly known as the surfi- cial aquifer. The carbonate rocks contain the Floridan aquifer system, formerly known as the Floridan aquifer. The two aquifer systems are separated by a fine clastic unit that retards the exchange of water between them and is known as the intermediate confining unit (thickness is shown in fig. 13). The Floridan aquifer system has two major water -bearing zones separated by a less permeable confining unit (Tibbals, 1981, p. 7). In descending order, the aquifer system is divided into the Upper Floridan aquifer, the middle semiconfining unit, and the Lower Floridan aquifer (see fig. 9). Geologic structure can be an important control in a ground -water flow system in Indian River County. The top of the Floridan aquifer system generally dips to the southeast and has an irregular, eroded surface. Consequently, the continuity of water -bearing zones that are structurally controlled may appear erratic in occurrence (fig. 41). 15 310 Table 1.--Water-bearir{g characteristics and descriptions of the geologic units in Indian River Cattity Igpl/min — gallons per minute] Sys- Fonmtion Thickness Hydrogeologic tem Series name (feet) Description Yield of wells unit 16 311 Holocene Undifferentiated 0-25 Variable mixture of sand, Varies widely deposits 100 gal/min clay, coquina, and organic material but mostly less than 100 gal/min Pleistocene Fort Thompson 100-200 Coquina with variable Varies widely, near base in places from about 100 Clastic zone aquifer and Anastasia amomts of sand, silt from less than �+ Formations and organic material 100 to about 100-500 Limestone and dolomite Generally more than 700 gal/min 700 gal/min) Pliocene Tamiami Formation 0-60 Fragmented to cemented Generally 100 to Shallow rock coquina and limestone 700 gal/ain Dolomite, dolomitic limestone, limestone, zone Miocene Hm,;dvm Formation 70-520 Silty to sandy clay, Generally less WrE MIATE thin shell and limestone than 100 gl/min CITING UNIT 16 311 Oligocene Suwmrm Limestone 0-190 Chalky to crystalline Generally less than limestone 100 gal/min Upper Floridan Ocala Limestone 20-220 Limestone, dolomitic Varies widely, near base in places from about 100 aquifer to more than �+ 700 gal/min 100-500 Limestone and dolomite Generally more than 700 gal/min Eocene Awn Park Foxmation 20-120 Dolomite, dolomitic limestone, limestone, Probably much less titian 100 gal/min Middle semticon - fining unit and some gypsun 600-700 Limestone and dolomite Generally 100 to more than 700 gal/min Oldsmar lower Floridan Formation aquifer About Limestone " dolomite Boulder zone used. 1,000 as receiving unit for injection wells 16 311 0 100 200 W 0 300 11 D N 400 io Z g 3 500 O J W ro 600 W LL 700 Z a800 W 0 900 1,000 1,100 Z a W?~ Z Z:3 Uj i-- U Z GAMMA -RAY LOG GAMMA -RAY INTENSITY - UNDIFFERENTIATED SAND, CLAY, AND COQUINA' ANASTASIA AND TAMIAMI FORMATIONS HAWTHORN FORMATION OCALA UMESTONE AVON PARK FORMATION N W LU W Z W 0 W w �a Uj Ow W = = a o WQ J CL 0- CL 1,100 200 W w M M Q wzz -j O =) 000 p 2 M_ Z O 0 w LL_ wza ok goy area HAWTHORN FORMATION OCALA UMESTONE AVON PARK FORMATION N W LU W Z W 0 W w >o Z 800 = a o 100 J 1,000 CL 1,100 200 W w >0W N 300 w � 400 J U W O N 500 600 700 WN 'oW W w 800 900 1,000 1,100 Figure 9.--Gamma—ray log of well 46F showing geologic formations and hydrologic units. Miller (1982) reports that the small faults along Florida's east coast have the overall effect of thinning the Floridan aquifer system on the up - thrown side of the fault, but because displacement is small, the ground -water flow system is little affected. Only one of several faults reported as present in Indian River County by Bermes (1958, p. 8) was confirmed on the evidence of geophysical and driller's logs collected during this study. The fault extends approximately from the south -county line northward along the Indian River to about Johns Island where it may trend northeast (fig. 41). The displacement in the carbonate rock section is roughly 350 feet (fig. 11). The effect of the fault on geohydrologic conditions identified in Indian River County is considerable. On the downthrown side (east of the fault trace), the upper part of the Floridan aquifer system contains brackish water. On the upthrown side, water from the upper part of the system is relatively fresh. 17 312 bg ca L Li 12 4* S£81 Q SN S6 SZ91 Ss£Z MI31S.lS a331nOv 1V1�13anS auoz 011 010 auoz JOW M M01104S WW>W p 0 0 0 M N N J N .t t00 a00 O - r O Wit W sI =� L g o J 7.E m �+; YN�o �� N LJ U •7 a O O £ o 0 O O Q W Z U Z OC Q �O N J J O O N Q Z 41 O U < W O J c� co 41 � c 30 O c . v� 3�N 8 U � O_ N g � O b U � g g oc -C3 cn O N N co 000 O N N N mc O MISAS 833InOV OUMS ONINIJN '1VOO auoz OI }5010 auoz �301 31VIa3PI83AI "Do n MOII04S0 p O O po O N N ^ Q cn QC, seg 3 SBII secl�—� � N N S4Sl g J c < op 3 N O O o S891 �Z a It/ ,0,0�1 �p z I o o wLL- IP �l , S F W � N N to LL. N 18 CO O N r zl � r' FEET zolj,FEET Eli 200 � vi �Ik zd 200 aaoo'L ata^o U_ 04 SEA"' \+ SEA LEVEL LEVEL '.:: Holocene to Pliocene deposits;::::--.*.'.-...'..S:URFICIAL AQUIFER SYSTEM 0 200Hawthorn Formation INTERMEDIATE CONFINING I 200 Suwannee 'mestone UNIT I 400 ��SrJ 400 a e :Oc la • l.im s one t r.ral :{ 6006 600 FLO RIDAN AQUIFE M SYSTE Su ann e e 800 ' Limestone 0 800 :.A... n Po Form mt on 3 vo �•J•Ocal��l� 0 im s one':S''s'•> :r• 1 000 1,000 0 0 1,200 1,200 VERTICAL SCALE GREATLY •EXAGGERATED • • • � J .� MILEs� • O 5 KILOMETERS �n z I viz jr, 01 FEET vi I I za FEET 200 ,� �' N �I 200 SEAr � SEA LEVEL Holocene to Pliocene deposits':':::::`•:::'. ' LEVEL --SURFlCIAL AQUI FER SYSTEM'.`:''''.:' Suwannee 200 Hawthorn Formation Limestone 200 INTERMEDIATE CONFINING UNIT 40 0 Ocala • Limestone;:•`:s`''�''f.�:,•�t.;s? 0 y ' 600 600 'Avoo .n P �Fo atio ' ark rm n•`:�:•'.•�:�%�'�>::.'••��%�:'•.��°��'•`��?'�`:��?sr�i:-:�;��'.�'.:':: a. �:'•:•::i:�;i�Y%�•;;:� �iirkii{::: � iii:;+:s:i• ':`i �:t?:i �'••::i�i i:`{•`::� '•.'S: 800 � :::i:;X:;,•.:f:;':riii: !;}:`: }:` i.;:;:•�i•>tif.•.•;::.•:.::;::i IDAN��•AQUIFER��•SYSTEM • 800 1.0— 00 1,000 VERTICAL SCALE GREATLY EXAGGERATED o 5 MILEs O 5 KILOMETERS Figure 11.--Hydrogeologic sections I—I' and T—J' showing formations of the Floridan aquifer system (lines of section shown in fig. 47). 19 314 400 600 800 1,000 VERTICAL SCALE GREATLY EXAGGERATED 400 • / H M 1,000 O1_i IL I I_ I MILES O1 TS�KILOMETERS Figure 12.--Hydrogeologic section K -K' showing formations of the Floridan aquifer system (line of section shown in fig. 47). Ground -Water Occurrence and Movement Ground water in the surficial aquifer system is generally unconfined, but in the Floridan aquifer system the water is confined. The water table of the surficial aquifer system and the potentiometric surface of the Floridan aquifer system fluctuate continuously in response to changes in recharge and discharge. Most natural recharge to the surficial aquifer system is local precipitation in Indian River County, but most recharge to the Floridan aquifer system probably occurs in the Lake Wales Ridge area of eastern Polk and western Highlands Counties (fig. 14). Heads in the Floridan aquifer system are generally much higher than heads in the surfi- cial aquifer system so recharge from the surficial to the Floridan aquifer system cannot occur in the county. Natural discharge from the surficial aquifer system generally occurs as evapotranspiration and subsurface flow into the Indian River and St. Johns Marsh. Most of the county is in the discharge area of the Floridan aquifer system. There, natural discharge is largely by way of upward leakage through the intermediate confining unit and probably some small amounts of discharge from the subcrop area beneath the Atlantic Ocean. 20 I 315 K' of Uld N ZI K' Fah v lu W ol• �l FEET V NIh N m WIH i FEET 200 I I I I 200 y0 SEA N N O] w 4 `� SEA LEVEL .::'.Holocene Pliocene de osits ':':';::::':.::::::`•:':'':'::::`:.:.:':':: LEVEL .to :.•SURFlCIAL AQUIFER SYSTEM 200 Hawthorn Formation `' 200 I INTERMEDIATE CONFINING 400 600 800 1,000 VERTICAL SCALE GREATLY EXAGGERATED 400 • / H M 1,000 O1_i IL I I_ I MILES O1 TS�KILOMETERS Figure 12.--Hydrogeologic section K -K' showing formations of the Floridan aquifer system (line of section shown in fig. 47). Ground -Water Occurrence and Movement Ground water in the surficial aquifer system is generally unconfined, but in the Floridan aquifer system the water is confined. The water table of the surficial aquifer system and the potentiometric surface of the Floridan aquifer system fluctuate continuously in response to changes in recharge and discharge. Most natural recharge to the surficial aquifer system is local precipitation in Indian River County, but most recharge to the Floridan aquifer system probably occurs in the Lake Wales Ridge area of eastern Polk and western Highlands Counties (fig. 14). Heads in the Floridan aquifer system are generally much higher than heads in the surfi- cial aquifer system so recharge from the surficial to the Floridan aquifer system cannot occur in the county. Natural discharge from the surficial aquifer system generally occurs as evapotranspiration and subsurface flow into the Indian River and St. Johns Marsh. Most of the county is in the discharge area of the Floridan aquifer system. There, natural discharge is largely by way of upward leakage through the intermediate confining unit and probably some small amounts of discharge from the subcrop area beneath the Atlantic Ocean. 20 I 315 O to zo M d - O LO LO 0 O 00 M � //�� • N N o I • co O N • N • I � � n � N 4 N 00? 0 co � pSl •.•:tea`":`'`•': W { C1 to I• I W �p W O U '00 V-1030SO W W Y I I I 0 / I iO o iO ' r,. •,.. �' (Y W W �i ✓.;: IO p M rn N U � O I� _J Y r" N H MI�p D n N JN AO / I iO o iO o LO o p M rn N U 00 m v n H $• D 33 wL° e� II CL— i� E V) 0 DIS Q =;.L* I mo Cow M o d co M N I, I 4) om wm �E� d� v d C O ZC W O YF- a 4 O HO« `mr �� E3 QcyO c LAJ Z= Z/ m U V W S i O .0 .lJ Z W X o w I o iO o iO o LO d M a o n I� N N 21 c 3 cylc C c 0 U N v_ N E 0 c c 0 v E c 0 t 3 v s 0 c Y U I I M N 7 v+ tz O O 0 O 00 Lo O O o_ 00 0 r I o 0 N N W I Z 30 0: Q 0 it Q N m I. m WLLI (,.:.. W •1 m.. V Q W LLJ W O 6 /... ../ WA ./LA.K� /,/. O%. • •HARDEE; : 1 -DE SOTO 00to 00 O U') 0 0 0 00 00 t� N N N 22 � d v, o � w o a� C .0 N +' U = 3 w O c 0 0+ o+ E L v O U N E O O 'O C 3 y rn . O O O L00 N N N U O) .- ¢` Q ¢ o a 19 El 11 00 N � Cl) 0 v 3rn� pvU-. c L� 0 v t0 -.v C O N._ u �Op 00 N v3ya� Bow rn o O U oh C 3>.cv v -- o N o,0 vu 'C U U O µ, ^ c v -2 V)`y W-0 E :5 O Q a U 0 0yo vi_ ZyT3 Z ONO4>O CN E 0 o=_w O O 0 Q�0-1 3 0 E E c ZgZ O -"-- OLLJ cm O a a O xv1 W `z Water Quality The amount, properties, and type of dissolved and suspended materials in water often control its use. Water suitable for one use may be unsatis- factory for other uses. For example, water having moderate amounts of dissolved solids may be used for irrigation purposes, but may not be suit- able in the manufacture of high-grade paper which requires low dissolved solids. The chloride concentration and salinity of water in Indian River County are the most important limiting factors for public supply and agri- cultural use, which together account for more than 90 percent of the water used in the county. Chloride concentration is used in this report as an index to the overall quality of water in the county. Chloride concentrations of water in the_surficial and Floridan aquifer systems vary both areally and vertically because the geohydrologic condi- tions that control water quality differ to some degree from place to place. In this report, water with a chloride concentration of 250 mg/L or less is considered fresh; above 250 mg/L, the water is considered salty. Figure 15 is a graph showing the limiting concentrations of chloride recommended for plants, animals, and industrial uses. The terminology used to describe the salinity of water in the county is a classification based on dissolved -solids concentration and uses the ter- minology of Krieger and others (1957). Estimates of dissolved -solids and chloride concentrations can generally be obtained relatively easily and inexpensively by measuring an electrical property of the water called specific conductance, which is a measure of the capacity of water to conduct an electric current. Specific conductance varies with the concentration of dissolved mineral matter, the degree of ionization of the material, and the temperature of the water, and is reported in microsiemens per centimeter at 25 °C. Figures 16 and 17 show, respectively, the relation between chloride concentration, and specific conductance and between specific conductance and dissolved -solids concentra- tion. Data from Indian River County and nearby areas were used in plotting the graphs. Note in figure 16 that specific conductance is roughly three times the chloride concentration and in figure 17, that specific conductance is about one -and -a -half times the dissolved -solids concentration. In some less -mineralized waters, chloride may not be a major element and conductance may be more closely related to other constituents. At the left side, or low -range end of figure 16, the group of data indicating a change in slope of this graph reflects waters not dominated by chloride concentration. Hardness is expressed in terms of milligrams per liter of calcium carbonate (CaCO3). Water is considered soft if its hardness value lies between 0 and 75 mg/L, moderately hard between 75 and 150 mg/L, hard between 150 and 300 mg/L, and very hard for values above 300 mg/L of CaCO3 (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 1976). 23 318 U d+ d0 m q O O O O N 7 S $� O O O O N x rn O •- Q oa^ acoo 00 i° caoEn j E0 Z 03 v0> wc.�d�' "gg U� nc 0c �i w<'E°c' ov rnE a ac°' c ~ 4 v L-ON L C S >> A2 U CK E o G G �. V 0 a� c J C9 C9 ao'd vX�A Ec wr m Do (Z a Zl''+�v cv E'0H;; ou; o� coo O O: F `� Eao ` Eo lx :3 zcvk3cc[�ra�a5[q�,..� q0c ... w N . N �• O� O Z O t) L c� LL m c _j E o L qU =a d7 rZ :�aU t7 En o -q LO U 0 tna v ��° > v m 5 o c �. o coo 00 0 ° �` E z ;F Ec v'> w . C C •. . . . . . . . O L E q V Y '�- M� m q F W40 Q1 c By Q r N v , O O C l� �i � c� � O c' �1 UOQ Z naE c - LA . F - Y c 01'� mm = LLv t._ .p O d C Z` C q m r Y 7 U v> E O _ n _ 0a83fE o.° iia to ZO ` o :........: . . F L ° »• JQ;oM ysl�oo� Q Z.. O E - Udo z_ `- u rCl O C u r C t q d o N N c m m o m o �n rn o----'.' f N O �q -q �' c. 4 0 . z U d+ d0 O O O O O O L O O O N x rn O •- 8 21311'1 U3d SHWU01111W NI 'NOLLWZ:UN30N00 301UO-IHO 24 v 0 v c v E 0 v OR O� M 100,000 U 0 U) N F - Q W 10,000 U Z W Q � �F U Z 0 W U Z 0 U W U a lL to Z U W W i a to W 1,000 V) 0 U_ Z NOTE: Specific conductance aboutt`::;"': ;; ::.i:.:..............: . . ::: 3 times the chloride t:; :':f:::::;{. concentration ::.:r::::::.:::.:. .........................................................:::::::::::::...........................:....... r ::::::::::::::::: .......................... . .......................................................................................... ....................................................................................... }: :.a.: :�. ;::1 }:. Chloride ion ::::::::t;:: :::• ::.•:.::::::.::.:.... not dominant :: i N :. . c. ::::•; :1.. ........................................................ Chloride ion dominant :1 } is#:: :::;:� .. :•:{ . . :'•1: :;?;t`.:::. Recommended limit: ifi :�forPublic suPPIY:i:: . ;f;. :. 1 100 " - 100 250 1,000 10,000 100,000 CHLORIDE, IN MILLIGRAMS PER LITER Figure 16. --Relation between chloride concentration and specific conductance. GEOHYDROIAGY OF THE SURFICIAL AQUIFER SYSTEM Hydrogeologic Framework The surficial aquifer system consists of sediments of Pliocene age and younger that overlie the intermediate confining unit (Hawthorn Formation) of the Floridan aquifer system. In eastern Indian River County, the surficial aquifer system consists of a relatively thin, indurated carbonate unit, and an overlying relatively thick unit of unconsolidated clastic deposits. The surficial aquifer system generally is unconfined, but in places, may be semiconfined or confined where beds of low permeability are present. In this report, the surficial aquifer system is divided into two hydrogeologic units (table 1). The carbonate rock unit (Tamiami Formation) is termed the "shallow rock zone" and the unconsolidated clastic unit (combined Holocene deposits, Fort Thompson and Anastasia Formation) is termed the "clastic zone." 25 320 U 0 to N I- Q w� U W Z w h � U � Z O W Z U 0 U w U a Z U W W � IL W V) 0 T U_ Z 100,000 10,000 1,000 100 5!111111en NOTE: Specific conductance i about 1.5 times the dissolved solids concentration Very / Fresh ......................./ Recommended limi for public supply/ ....................... Brackish wate .......... -: f F FA 100 500 1,000 3,000 10,000 35,000 DISSOLVED SOLIDS CONCENTRATION, IN MILLIGRAMS PER LITER Figure 17. --Relation between specific conductance and dissolved—solids concentration, and the classification of salinity of water. In eastern Indian River County, the thickness of the surficial aquifer system is related to the topography, so the system is thickest beneath the higher areas such as the Ten -Mile Ridge and the Atlantic Coastal Ridge. The system ranges in thickness from about 100 to 200 feet (fig. 18) and thickens southward to its maximum south of State Road 60. The hydrogeologic sections in figure 10 indicate the extent and thickness of the surficial aquifer system in eastern Indian River County. The Tamiami Formation is composed of interbedded limestone, coquina, and sand and clay of Pliocene age. The formation, as much as 60 feet thick (fig. 19), overlies the Hawthorn Formation and is confined to the eastern part of the county. Its maximum thickness coincides with the Atlantic Coastal Ridge north of Vero Beach --thickness decreases east and west of the ridge. West of the Ten -Mile Ridge, the Tamiami grades into a "gray sand zone" that consists of gray sand and shell interbedded with clayey sands. The Tamiami Formation is often called "hardrock" by local well drillers. 26 321 O N 0 O 00 N Ln O LO LO 0 O 00 W m 0 I 00 V-1030SO W W Y 0 d 4- N SON • ::: . M •. . Z G.EPN O : o O = U E- C: Nco �, cl: I >jC �V7 I OW Z W u) •� PTL..... �• �� _ OWN I �•• N ai — to �h : 3 • N � tD 0— K) —125 M x 04 N 01 14- N r 'n N I N N •"• N N 000 N N • o • � • t0 OD 0 ro I m rs r - rn �W U _ N O S! •- • rn cn 7 J 1 �P r • I ♦- I nO N In • co co ao W m 0 I 00 V-1030SO W W Y 0 0% A N N M d 4- N SON � V ru d d M Z x�Z Ugd " Q yo O = U E- C: uw t\ cl: I >jC �V7 I OW Z W Q aEi Z OWN I �•• N ai W O (n o : 3 x 04 W • 0% A N N M LO d d M ►� 0 0 t\ r - N N 0% A N N M O N 0 O 00 N 10 � / M �n o r7 W� J 0 F N � Z O cn O O wl .2�, UO o �w I- Fz-aE i W Q m o <o 0 O N CY o a W a- w A 3 � W X Y w � i �n o r7 M 0 N M N M M 00 Q� c 0 to C: r 0 v C: v 0 Q N LLv E 0 c 0 v 0 v v F- n� s w 0 (0 V) 0 c U t N N O N C N C7 I a� v+ L. The Anastasia Formation consists primarily of shellbeds of Pleistocene age that contain varying amounts of quartz sand, silt, and organic material. The shellbeds range from uncemented to a moderately hard coquina. The Anastasia Formation generally underlies the Barrier Islands and extends inland about 3 to 10 miles to the vicinity of the Ten -Mile Ridge. There, the composition of the Anastasia Formation changes from mostly shell to sand (Bermes, 1958; Crain and others, 1975). West of the Ten -Mile Ridge, the Fort Thompson Formation is equivalent to the Anastasia Formation and con- sists of less cemented coquina lenses and progressively greater percentages of sand and some very sandy limestone beds (Bermes, 1958). The Anastasia Formation, and (or) the Fort Thompson Formation generally is covered by thin Holocene sands, silts, and clay. The combined thickness of Holocene and Anastasia or Fort Thompson deposits ranges from about 100 to 200 feet. Hydraulic Properties The hydraulic properties of the surficial aquifer system in eastern Indian River County vary considerably from place to place depending on characteristics such as grain size, sorting, packing, and cementation. These properties are reflected in values of transmissivity, storage, hydraulic conductivity and specific capacity that indicate the ability of an aquifer to yield water to wells. Transmissivity is a measure of the rate at which water moves through a unit width of an aquifer under a unit hydraulic gradient. The storage coefficient is the volume of water an aquifer releases from or takes into storage per unit surface area of the aquifer per unit change in head. Leakance is the ratio of the vertical hydraulic conductivity and the thickness of the confining unit and is a measure of the ability of confining units to leak water to adjacent aquifers. Hydraulic conductivity is defined as the rate of water flow through a unit cross section of an aquifer under a unit hydraulic gradient. Generally, the larger the value for transmissivity and hydraulic conduc- tivity, the more productive the aquifer. Specific capacity is defined as the well discharge per unit of draw- down. Specific capacities of wells completed in the surficial aquifer system in eastern Indian River County range from 21 to 70 (gal/min)/ft (fig. 20). In the Vero Beach well field, specific capacities range from 9 to 36 (gal/min)/ft (fig. 21). Specific capacities tend to be highest in the areas south of Main Canal and west of the airstrip but decrease to the east and southwest. Values of transmissivity, storage coefficient, and hydraulic conduc- tivity for the surficial aquifer system at several locations are given in table 2. Transmissivities range from 1,500 ft2/d at Winter Beach to 11,000 ft2/d at Sebastian Highlands where the aquifer is mostly shell deposits. At Hobart Park, the aquifer also contains shell deposits, and the transmis- sivity is 7,900 ft2/d. Transmissivity values tend to be lower in the shal- low rock zone than in the clastic zone. At Vero Beach, where wells penetrate both zones, transmissivities range from 2,400 to 6,300 ft2/d. 29 324 27050 45 40 27* 35 800 35' 301 25' 800 20' Figure 20. --Specific capacity of wells completed in the surficial aquifer system and location of aquifer test sites in eastern Indian. River County. 30 325 -:EXPLANATION BREVARD Co. 0A AQUIFER TEST SITE AND REFERENCE LETTER -- Results in table 2 given 7- 0 21 WELL -- Number is specific capacity, in gallons per _j minute per foot of Sebastian drawdown Highlands �34 D Fellsmere r 70 29 26' Wobosso Hobart Park C 21 Winter 95 Beach Figure 20. --Specific capacity of wells completed in the surficial aquifer system and location of aquifer test sites in eastern Indian. River County. 30 325 N N Of � N — — — ± I� M r N+ Ln g+ + ^ N N N + O Nw tNON 'mw w .-Ir- 0 NIN ( M M -i � �o0d t)�NWNO 1 N O + uv F- N MI NN N (n w O I w N �— J O O � m .O 0 IM O — I + N u) ® MM O + + N os > v y NIN � N ® K r N N 0 N SIM to O ND g +n o N O OM N 0--o 7IN O Z J(nO)IN N t : -;EN IM J N ro -IO O -- In + O IIF Ln rJ U.O I Mlrn I Z 6 O p C o O— Nw to v LLI —�—�- O 3 a cvi H C.L. !,G, O tD Q O C 0 B. O, Z — 7 (D C .IVMHOIH SONx a 2 3 o tn.S II E wO+ ol- 31 N M 0 E:2 T_ � 3 N •Q � vm v .� o 't > 7 f/1 y r N +J .c m da� 3 ao E U 0 U E y � O O y �U U O CIL v U L 119 Table 2.--Aquifer-test results for the surficial aquifer system at four sites in Indian River County [ft2/d = feet squared per day; ft/d = feet per day) Reference Transmis- Storage Hydraulic Source letter Site sivity (T) coeffi- conductivity' of (fig. 20) location (ft2/d) cient (S) ft/d data2 A Vero Beach 2,400-6,300 -4 2.3 x 10_1 33-80 1 --- 1.5 x 10_4 --- B Winter Beach 1,500-1,900 1.9 x 10_2 40-48 2 C Hobart Park 7,900 1.4 x 10_4 110 3 D Sebastian 11,000 1.0 x 10 348 4 Highlands 'Hydraulic conductivity estimated from transmissivity and thickness of aquifer penetrated. 2Reference: (1) Gee and Jenson (1980). (2) Estimated from the hydrograph of a cyclically pumped well (Brown, 1963) using a well at Winter Beach. (3) Geraghty and Miller (1978). (4) Geraghty and Miller (1981a). Storage coefficients for the surficial aquifer system at four sites in Indian River County range from 1.0 x 10-1 at Sebastian Highlands to 0.15 at Vero Beach (table 2). At most of the sites, the zones tested in the surficial aquifer system responded as a leaky artesian aquifer. At Vero Beach, the aquifer at one of two sites tested in the surficial aquifer system acted as an unconfined aquifer (storage coefficient is 0.15). Hydraulic conductivities of the surficial aquifer system in Indian River County are generally about 40 ft/d (feet per day), but some values may exceed 350 ft/d where shell deposits are extensive. Description of Wells that Tap the System For this study, 336 wells in the surficial aquifer system were inven- toried (see Supplementary Data I and fig. 2). These wells represent only a small number of the surficial wells that exist in Indian River County. Uninventoried domestic and irrigation wells probably number in the thousands. Wells that penetrate the clastic zone range from 35 to 90 feet in depth. Well casings generally extend to the top of a producing zone --the remaining depth of hole is commonly screened. Large -yield wells often tap both the clastic zone and the underlying shallow rock zone of the surficial aquifer system. The shallow rock zone is usually left as open hole in wells that penetrate both zones. 32 327 The location of production and monitor wells in the Vero Beach well field is shown in figure 21. Supply wells in the Vero Beach well field are 80 to 140 feet deep, have 40 to 65 feet of casing, and are typically completed as open -hole. Yields of wells in the Vero Beach well field range from 250 to 1,200 gal/min. The larger yields are from wells that are deep enough to tap both the clastic and the shallow rock zones, and where the surficial aquifer system is thickest. The lowest yields in the county (less than 10 gal/min) occur in marsh areas in the central part of the county. Water Levels Water levels in the surficial aquifer system in the eastern part of the county fluctuate in response to seasonal changes in precipitation, evapo- transpiration, and pumping. Water levels also may fluctuate in response to manipulation of flows in these drainage network in the county. Water levels have been monitored in several observation wells in the surficial aquifer system (fig. 22). Hydrographs showing long-term variations in water levels in the wells are shown in figure 24. In the southwestern part of the county, at the western edge of the Pamlico terrace (fig. 4), water levels are near land surface. The land surface altitude is about 30 feet at well 134S (fig. 22) and during wet periods water levels may rise above the land surface. Water levels in this well fluctuate between 25 and 31 feet altitude but average about 28 feet (fig. 23). Hydrographs of daily maximum water levels in wells 239S, 316S, and 217S are shown in figures 23 and 24. At well 239S near Fellsmere (fig. 22) the land surface altitude is about 27 feet. Water levels in that well fluctuate by as much as 2 feet monthly and declined from an altitude of about 26 feet to about 23 feet between September 1982 and May 1983. During the interval between September 1984 and May 1985, levels remained close to an altitude of 25 feet. At well 316S in Roseland (fig. 22), water levels declined from above 17 to 15 feet altitude between September 1982 and July 1983. Since April 1984, the altitudes of water levels in this well have been above 14.5 feet. At Wabasso School (well 217S, figs. 22 and 24), the altitude of the water level declined from about 9 feet in May 1983 to near 6.5 feet in September 1984. Between March and May 1985, water -level altitudes fluctuated from below 7 to above 11 feet, and averaged 9 feet. The wells at Roseland and Wabasso School are located just west and east of the Atlantic Coastal Ridge where land surface altitudes are 19 and 12 feet, respectively. The effect of nearby pumping on water levels in the surficial aquifer system was observed at well 39S (see fig. 22 for location). Water -level altitudes in well 39S averaged about 16 feet between May 1983 and April 1984, 14 feet between May and November 1984, and approximately 7.5 feet during January through March 1985. In April 1985, water levels had declined to an altitude of 4 feet. The 10 -foot decline in the water level in this well coincided with the startup of a nearby well at Vero Beach (well 46S). 33 328 O N 0 00 to N O M O d - 0 Ln LO 0 00 0 LO 0 Lid 0 Ln � � n r7 O O N N MA W4 r J W W J Q W rwn 0 M Q N W W W Z ..J W J 3 20 18 16 14 28 27 26 25 24 23 22 32 31 30 29 28 27 26 25 WELL 316S (Daily maximum) i O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M WELL 239S (Daily maximum) rV V fvr.,J"4 Figure 23. --Water level in wells 316S, 239S, and 134S. 35 330 12 3 w10 m 8 0 0 6 mJ ¢W 4 �J LL 2 z cn — SEA LEVEL W 2 X W 4 Q 3 J W J W m W 0 m W W z J ,W J W Q 3 17 15 13 11 9 7 5 3 WELL 151 S (Daily maximum) 'NID JIFIMIAIMIJIJIAISIOINID JIFIMIAIMIJIJIAISIOINID JIFIMIAIMIJIJIAISIOINID JIFIMIAIM 1981 1982 1983 1 1984 1 1985 WELL 217S (Daily maximum) LMIJIJIAIS10INID JIFIMIAIMIJIJIAIS10INID JIF1MIAA 1983 1984 1985 M Figure 24. --Water level in wells 151S and 217S. 36 331 Water Levels in the Vero Beach Well Field Water levels in the Vero Beach well field during May 1981 (an unusually dry year) and May 1984 (a year of about average rainfall) are shown in figures 25 and 26. Water levels were measured in monitor and production wells, when pumps were operating, and therefore illustrate the general pattern of the cone of depression caused by well -field pumping. In May 1981, water levels were as low as 39 feet below sea level (fig. 25). Water levels were lowest east and north of the airstrip. In May 1984 water levels at pumping centers were as much as 28 feet higher than in May 1981. Water levels continued to be lowest east and north of the airstrip. The dif- ference in water levels between the first half of 1981 and 1984 is clearly shown in the hydrograph of well 1215 in the Vero Beach well field (fig. 27). In 1981, water levels at production well 121S reached more than 37 feet below sea level, but rebounded to near sea level during periods of average rainfall (see rainfall graph in fig. 30). Part of the rise in water level is probably caused by a change in the pattern of pumping in the well field. Some observation wells, such as 145S and 1005 in the Vero Beach well field, are apparently little affected by pumping. Monitor well 145S is west of the well field and monitor well 100S is located adjacent to Main Canal (fig. 22). Water levels in monitor well 145S were lowest during the summer of 1981 and spring of 1985 (fig. 30). Both time intervals coincide with much below-average rainfall periods. Levels in 1455 remained high in 1982 when rainfall was above average. Yields of many wells in the Vero Beach well field decreased in 1981 due to the large drawdowns in the surficial aquifer system caused by long-term continuous pumping. The problem was alleviated by implementing a well -field management program that involved alternating withdrawals between sets of wells spaced far enough apart so as to minimize interfering drawdowns. In addition, a few wells were deepened to penetrate the shallow rock zone, and several wells were installed to replace wells previously abandoned because of low yield. The hydrograph of observation well 151S (fig. 24) illustrates the effect of nearby pumping from production wells prior to mid -1982, and the effect of well field expansion and management since mid -1982. Figure 28 shows the average monthly daily pumpage for the Vero Beach well field from 1975 to 1985. Pumpage approximately doubled during the 10 -year period from 1975 to 1985 and peaked to about 9.5 Mgal/d in the spring during the 1981 drought. Coinciding with the increase in pumpage, however, water levels have declined in the vicinity of the Vero Beach well field. A recent downward trend is shown by the hydrograph of well 151S also in the Vero Beach well field (fig. 24). Water levels reached a low of 5 feet below sea level in June 1982 but rebounded to an altitude of 9.5 feet in September 1982. Since December 1982 water levels have declined and by October 1984 were 1 foot below sea level. A comparison of water levels in the surficial aquifer in the vicinity of the Vero Beach well field in April 22, 1971, (Crain and others, 1975, fig. 28, p. 55) with water levels in May 1984 (fig. 26), indicates a decline of about 15 to 19 feet. 332 37 :....RtVE .. c0 0 � q O QID C r y N O 0 Z O �t OL I pZ.+ y �w d� d •y C Q O Ovt3p�Zp Z M.��'_,v_y�`�w Ldp ElID y • mp0Ou%E'E-' O N 3 �Gl B O E 0 3_r L.. 7 U C O dt y y+ f 3� X �N d � X:ud -j— o W W �o O 3 I z � U o �w; Q 1 � • <° • I o � fA W • m.° N O o T u _J Y � m cl C) U I LO V) I O o M '' O O I • \ r • I I 38 � q O QID C r y N O 0 Z O �t OL - pZ.+ y �w d� d •y C Q O Ovt3p�Zp Z M.��'_,v_y�`�w Ldp ElID y Z00 mp0Ou%E'E-' O N 3 �Gl B O E 0 3_r L.. 7 U C O dt y y+ f 3� X �N d � X:ud -j— o W a 3 o m <° • 38 IND 0—J 39 It M M 00 rn r 0 v w 3 L U O N m O CD L 41 N N L— _O 7 Q' O v .0 a� L 0 CD U w N U .L a 0 c C O 0 - CN N N 7 IL Fj �_ o i 10 �; M0 > N O i + J \vl Y k I \ r m � I 0 i O O i eu i 39 It M M 00 rn r 0 v w 3 L U O N m O CD L 41 N N L— _O 7 Q' O v .0 a� L 0 CD U w N U .L a 0 c C O 0 - CN N N 7 IL 10 J W 6 SEA W -j LEVEL iL6 Z N 3 10 J 0 W J W J m 20 a � W 0 Q W 3 0 30 m a 40 WELL 121S Water level \\—Chloride concentration 1981 1982 1QR3 1QR4 1QRR 50 0 W Q J 40 z W W 0- 0 30 0 2 20 p � J o� J 10 z Figure 27. --Water level and chloride concentration of water in well 121S in the Vero Beach well field, 1981-85. 10 } Q � 9 wW 0W Qa dU) 8 �Z Do d -jJ 7 J � ZZ 6 -1 O 2J 5 5 z 4 VERO BEACH WELL FIELD 1975 1 1976 1 1977 1 1978 1 1979 1 1980 1 1981 1 1982 1 1983 1984 185 Figure 28. --Monthly pumpage from the Vero Beach well field, 1975-85. 40 335 Recharge and Discharge in the System The surficial aquifer system in Indian River County is recharged mostly by infiltration of rainfall and by some downward percolation of irrigation water. The aquifer system receives little recharge from the underlying Floridan aquifer system because a thick confining unit of low permeability strata (the Hawthorn Formation) effectively separates the surficial and Floridan aquifer systems. Discharge from the surficial system occurs as seepage to the ocean, lakes, rivers, and canals, evapotranspiration, and withdrawals from wells. Some recharge to the surficial aquifer system may occur from the canal system. For example, maximum stage fluctuations in Main Canal and water - level fluctuations of monitor well 100S (adjacent to Main Canal) are strik- ingly similar (fig. 29). When maximum stage is greater than the water level in well 100S, such as in the spring of 1981-82, water in Main Canal probably recharged the surficial aquifer. The water level in the surficial aquifer system rises and declines during wet and dry periods in response to recharge and discharge. The hydrograph of well 145S (fig. 30) illustrates the relation between monthly rainfall at Vero Beach and water levels in the well. The water level in well 145S rose 5.7 feet in response to the rainfall of 16 inches in August 1981 and an attendant reduction in pumpage. z 16 15 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 WELL 100S and MAIN CANAL Water level Water level in canal /� I -,in well d / It► / I, +t '\ It I I� I i t It n 1 1 V t l t y t I v r l A 11 Ir \ r `vl Chloride concentration in well 1QRn 1aR1 1aa1 lens 1ORA Figure 29. --Water level and chloride concentration of water in well 100S, and stage of Main Canal, 1980-84. 350 325 300 275 250 225 200 175 150 41 336 z(K OW QJ Z IL ZN 02 UX W0 QJ EJ 02 I U� J 20 J Q zW 15 �I Z 10 J �Z 5 Z O 2 0 VERO BEACH 4W 22 21 WELL 145S J W 20 J WW 19 �N It o 18 Wm QQ 3� 17 W LL 16 Z Water level V 15 14 1980 it V It � I Chloride concentration 1981 1982 1983 1984 60 Z10� OF 58 Q F -10t 56 a a O2 54 U § WO OJ 52 0 J 2 J I 50 O — 1985 Figure 30. --Water level and chloride concentration of water in well 145S, and monthly rainfall at Vero Beach, 1980-85. In places, head differences in the clastic and shallow rock zones allow ground -water movement from one zone to the other. To observe the head - difference relations, observation wells were installed in both the shallow rock zone and the clastic zone at several sites throughout the county. The well locations, well numbers, and selected water -level data are given in table 3 and figures 1 and 21. Comparison of water levels in the shallow rock and clastic zones at Vero Beach Elementary School (39S, 38S), South Gifford Road (1625, 161S), Wabasso (178S, 177S), and Roseland (316S, 317S) show little head difference (table 3). However, at the South Canal (31S, 32S), Winter Beach (168S, 167S), Wabasso School (217S, 2165), and Fellsmere (2395, 2405) the heads in the zones differ. This difference in head and location of wells can be used to define a pattern of recharge and discharge. West of the Atlantic Coastal Ridge, in wells 239S, 2405, 168S, and 167S, water levels are higher in the clastic zone than in the shallow rock zone; therefore, in this area, the clastic zone recharges the underlying shallow 42 337 Table 3. --Water levels in wells in the clastic zone and shallow rock zone Well No. Location Water level, in feet above sea level Aquifer Feb -Mar 1983 Dec 1983 April 1984 March 1985 31S South Canal Shallow rock zone 9.8 9.6 8.1 6.6 32S Shallow rock zone Clastic zone 7.8 6.7 6.1 5.4 39S Vero Beach Shallow rock zone 19.1 17.0 18.3 11.1 38S Elementary School Clastic zone 19.2 17.6 18.1 10.9 162S South Gifford Shallow rock zone 19.9 17.0 16.2 14.4 161S Clastic zone 20.1 17.3 16.7 15.1 168S Winter Beach Shallow rock zone 16.4 14.7 14.8 13.8 167S Clastic zone 18.1 16.1 17.0 15.3 178S Wabasso Shallow rock zone 18.2 16.5 16.7 15.0 177S Clastic zone 19.9 16.7 17.3 15.2 217S Wabasso School Shallow rock zone 13.6 11.7 ll.7 10.8 2165 Clastic zone 11.7 10.6 10.6 10.2 239S Fellsmere Shallow rock zone 25.6 24.1 24.9 23.6 240S Clastic zone -- 24.7 25.9 24.3 316S Roseland Shallow rock zone 17.9 16.8 16.7 16.6 317 Clastic zone 18.3 16.8 17.4 16.0 rock zone. East of the ridge, in wells 31S, 32S, 2175, and 216S, water levels are higher in the shallow rock zone than in the clastic zone; here the shallow rock zone discharges to the overlying clastic zone. Water Quality General In coastal areas, ground water in the surficial aquifer system may be very saline as a result of lateral saltwater intrusion. In agricultural areas, the salinity of surficial ground water may be high because of the salinity of irrigation water or contamination of the shallow ground water with deeper, more saline water, through deteriorated or leaking well casings. Table 4 lists representative analyses of water from 8 wells in the shallow rock zone, 7 wells in the clastic zone, and 1 well in the shallow rock zone (1S) that probably contains intruded saltwater. Also given in the table are ranges of concentrations of selected constituents in water from 39 wells in the shallow rock zone (depth >75 feet) and 51 wells in the clastic zone (depth <75 feet). 43 338 Table 4. --Representative analyses and ranges in concentrations of constituents in water from wells completed in the clastic and shallow rock zones of the surficial aquifer system [Concentrations are in milligrams per liter] REPRESENTATIVE ANALYSES Well Depth Potas- Cal- Magne- Hard- Bicar- Chlo- Sul - No. (feet) Sodium sium cium sium Iron ness bonate ride fate Clastic zone (<75 feet in depth) 32S 53 26. 0.7 105 6.5 0.92 289 330 48 21 38S 55 12 .6 76 4.3 .67 208 224 16 9 161S 53 39 13.3 158 7.9 2.9 428 540 51 <1 167S 53 32 2.4 54 3.2 1.6 148 464 65 20 1775 41 18 .4 87 2.5 .3 227 366 40 0 216S 49 67 .9 84 2.9 .05 222 310 120 40 317S 35 14 2.8 5.1 3.2 .13 25.9 26.8 26 1 Shallow rock zone (>75 feet in depth) 1S' 147 14,000 500 630 1,900 22.0 9,393 922 30,250 4,000 31S 143 30 5.6 63 9 1.5 194 291 41 <1 39S 123 43 4.5 90 8.7 .5 261 322 60 <1 162S 150 44 1.9 112 8.4 2.9 315 372 73 <1 168S 144 19 3.7 84 3.9 8.2 226 464 25 0 178S 137 39 2.0 78 6.0 3.1 220 337 40 0 217S 133 26 7.1 26 18 .4 139 239 35 0 239S 140 44 10 27 16 .6 133 209 45' 0 3165 134 35 2.9 36 21 1.2 176 197 50 0 RANGES OF CONCENTRATIONS Range Sodium Potas- sium Cal- cium Magne- slum Iron Hard- ness Bicar- bonate Chlo- ride Sul - fate Clastic zone (51 wells <75 feet in depth) Low High 11 520 2 13.3 21 158 2 76 0.3 8.1 180 328 169 540 20 535 0 280 Shallow rock zone (39 wells >75 feet in depth) Low High 16 160 0.5 10 24 162 0.5 53 0.3 _8.2 240 434 154 390 10 415 0 185 'Indicates lateral intrusion. 44 339 Occurrence of Chlorides Chloride concentrations of water from wells more than 75 feet deep in the surficial aquifer system in eastern Indian River County are below 100 mg/L, except in an area along Sebastian Creek and along the Indian River near the Vero Beach well field, where concentrations are above 250 mg/L (fig. 31). In this figure, the 250 mg/L chloride line generally parallels the Indian River but bows inland toward the Vero Beach well field. Chloride concentrations increase from about 250 mg/L just east of the Vero Beach well field to more than 20,000 mg/L near the Indian River. Chloride concentrations of water from wells 40 to 75 feet deep in the clastic zone also increase in an easterly direction, but values are not as high along the Indian River (fig. 32). Chloride concentrations west of the Indian River are generally less than 250 mg/L. Between the Vero Beach well field and the Indian River, chloride concentrations range from 50 to 100 mg/L. Concentrations greater than 250 mg/L occur in a small area bisected by Main Canal west of the Vero Beach well field, in the Sebastian Creek area, and on the Barrier Island. Many wells in the Floridan aquifer system are cased to the top of the Hawthorn Formation, are more than 20 years old, and were constructed with steel casing that may be corroded through. Eastern Indian River County is a discharge area of the Floridan aquifer system and corroded -through casings of wells that tap the system could allow water from the Floridan aquifer system to intrude into the surficial aquifer system. Six cross sections in the eastern part of the county (fig. 33) show the relation between chloride concentration in ground water and the depths of wells (figs. 34-37). Inter- pretation of data shown in the cross sections indicates several patterns of chloride occurrence. Water from a few wells deeper than 80 feet have higher chloride concentrations than adjacent wells of near the same depth (figs. 34 and 35). The high concentrations may be due to intrusion of the shallow rock zone by more saline water from nearby wells in the Floridan aquifer system. Sections E -E' and G -G' (figs. 35 and 36) show high chloride concentra- tions in water from a few wells less than about 80 feet deep. Along cross- section E -E' (fig. 35), chloride concentrations of water in three wells in the surficial aquifer system with depths less than 25 feet. equal or exceed 180 mg/L. Along section G -G' (fig. 36), the lowest chloride concentration in water from the nine wells plotted in the Floridan aquifer system is 180 mg/L. The high chloride concentrations found in water from these relatively shallow wells in the surficial aquifer system may be due to downward seepage of irrigation water from the Floridan aquifer system or from wells in the Floridan aquifer system with corroded -through casings near the water table. The city of Vero Beach and the St. Johns River Water Management District have plugged several wells in the Floridan aquifer system that were leaking relatively high chloride concentration water into the surficial aquifer system through corroded casings. A common practice in the development of citrus groves into an urbanized area has been to bury existing wells in the Floridan aquifer system. As a consequence, the location of many wells in the Floridan aquifer system that potentially could cause intrusion problems is unknown. 45 340 27°50 45 40 27035 800 35' 30' 25' 1 800 20' 95 \\\\\\\\\\\\\\ 0 \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ a \\\\Vero Beach \\\\\ ':':'•o -- \\\\ well field\ \\\ (> VERO BEACH \ ... ...:..... ... \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ :,?Jy,...... \\\\\\\\\\\\\\ \ \ South Cana! \ \ O 1 2 3 4 5 MILES 0 1 2 3 4 5 KILOMETERS \\\\\\\ \\\\\ \ o \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ —S —T. LUCIE CO. Figure 31. --Chloride concentrations in water from wells completed in the shallow rock zone (depths greater than 75 feet), 1982-83. 46 341 EXPLANATION B R EVAR D CO. \ \ \ \ Z CHLORIDE CONCENTRATION, IN MILLIGRAMS PER LITER \\\\\\\ < 100 \\\\\\\ \ 100 - 250 250 - 1,000 > 1,000 \\\\\\\\\\\\\\ \\\\\\\\\\\\\ \\\\\\\\\\\\\ \\\\\\\\\\\\\ 95 \\\\\\\\\\\\\\ 0 \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ a \\\\Vero Beach \\\\\ ':':'•o -- \\\\ well field\ \\\ (> VERO BEACH \ ... ...:..... ... \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ :,?Jy,...... \\\\\\\\\\\\\\ \ \ South Cana! \ \ O 1 2 3 4 5 MILES 0 1 2 3 4 5 KILOMETERS \\\\\\\ \\\\\ \ o \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ —S —T. LUCIE CO. Figure 31. --Chloride concentrations in water from wells completed in the shallow rock zone (depths greater than 75 feet), 1982-83. 46 341 27° 50 45 40 27° 35 30° 35' 30' 25' 80 ° 20' Figure 32. --Chloride concentrations in water from wells completed in the clastic zone (depths between 40 and 75 feet), 1982-83. 47 342 IPA I Rik VA�/� ..�/.. PAN T. LUCIIEtCO. -. Figure 32. --Chloride concentrations in water from wells completed in the clastic zone (depths between 40 and 75 feet), 1982-83. 47 342 27050 45 40 27°35 80° 35' 30' 25' 80° 20' Figure 33. --Location of lines of chloride sections (sections shown in figs. 34-37). 48 M, K 500 400 300 W N J It 200 W IL Q 100 Of J J 0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 1 W Z D n, m 0 Q 500 z W z 400 O U 0 25 50 75 80 100 125 U 150 N 175 g 200 3 W 0 300 O J U 200 100 0 0 L W LL 25 z J 50 W 3 75 0 80 I 100 a W D 125 150 175 200 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 DISTANCE, IN MILES Figure 34. --Chloride concentrations in water and depth of wells in the surficial aquifer system along lines of section C—C' and D—D' (lines of section shown in fig. 33). 49 344 E 1200 r 1000 :e• w W J 400 a W 200 i x x Well depth Chloride concentration x Note: Some well depths x are unknown xx X x x x x x x x � XcX BSc X= x E' 0 25 50 75 80 100 125 W U L 150 x D U) 175 0 g 200 500 400 300 200 100 0 o W LL 25 z J J 50 W 3 ILL 75 0 80 100 W 0 125 150 175 200 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 DISTANCE, IN MILES Figure 35. --Chloride concentrations in water and depth of wells in the surficial aquifer system along lines of section E — E' and F — F' (lines of section shown in fig. 33). 50 345 3 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 O W m F F' 500 400 300 200 100 0 o W LL 25 z J J 50 W 3 ILL 75 0 80 100 W 0 125 150 175 200 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 DISTANCE, IN MILES Figure 35. --Chloride concentrations in water and depth of wells in the surficial aquifer system along lines of section E — E' and F — F' (lines of section shown in fig. 33). 50 345 1000 V) a U J 800 ►; Z - 400 20 G G' 0 Well depth -/x Chloride X ® j WELL >200 concentration t FEET DEEP x WELL IN SURFICIAL W Depth of ® e AQUIFER SYSTEM well unknown ® ® ® WELL IN FLORIDAN X ® X AQUIFER SYSTEM X X x X x X X * X X X XXX X x X XXX X �, 25 w U L 50 a D J� 75 w 0 80 3 g 100 0 3 �O 125 w m O� 150 W Z 175 200 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 DISTANCE, IN MILES Figure 36. --Chloride concentration in water and depth of wells in the surficial and Floridan aquifer systems along line of section G -G' (line of section shown in fig. 33). Areal patterns of occurrence and depth of occurrence of high chloride concentrations in water from wells often suggest a particular source for the high concentration. For example, when the chloride concentrations of water from wells increase with depth and are anomalously high, such as in the Sebastian Creek area, the cause may be intrusion by leakage, at depth, of water from wells that tap the Floridan aquifer system. Also, in areas where the chloride concentration of water is higher in a shallow well than in nearby deeper wells, such as west of Vero Beach straddling State Road 60, the cause is probably downward infiltration of Floridan aquifer system irrigation water or seepage from system wells. Along the coastal sections of Indian River County, the high chloride concentrations of water in many of the wells greater than 40 feet deep is probably due to the lateral intrusion of seawater. Occurrence of Chlorides in the Vero Beach Area Chloride concentrations in water from observation wells in the Vero Beach well field change in response to water -level fluctuations (see figs. 29 and 30) caused by pumping (discharge) and by recharge. Concentrations generally increase when water levels decline and decrease when water levels rise. However, in monitor well 100S, located just south of Main Canal, chlorides have increased though water levels are trending upward. Between 51 346 V) 500 i Q O � 400 ►a z zW OW Q -j �(If Wd U Z O U W 0 0 J I U 300 200 100 a x X Well depth Chloride `concentration X X X X W 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 DISTANCE, IN MILES X 25 W U 50 L JN 80 3 zz . 100 p g � O 125 w m D� 150 W W 175 200 Figure 37. --Chloride concentration in water and depth of wells in the surficial aquifer system along line of section H—H' (line of section shown in fig. 33). September 1981 and June 1982, chloride concentrations increased linearly to about 300 mg/L, and through 1983 and 1984 averaged about 300 mg/L (see figs. 39 and 40). The high chloride concentration found in well 1005 and observation wells 84S and 95S may indicate a plume of high chloride water moving toward the southeast (fig. 39). Chloride concentrations of 320 and 144 mg/L also occurred south of Main Canal in observation wells 95S and 84S, respectively, (fig. 21) in June 1984 (fig. 40). The high chloride concentra- tion in water from wells 1005, 95S, and 84S may be due to leakage from the corroded -through casings of wells in the Floridan aquifer system or recharge of high chloride concentration water from the canal when ground -water levels are periodically lower than the maximum stage of Main Canal (fig. 29). Chloride concentrations during the period 1979 to 1984 are shown for three salinity observation wells (wells 1195, 1255, and 126S, fig. 23) in figure 38. In June 1981, water in salinity observation well 126S, located between the Vero Beach well field and the Indian River (fig. 21), had a chloride concentration of 4,900 mg/L. A year later, following the 1981 drought, the concentration increased to 14,000 mg/L. However, during above normal precipitation periods in 1983 and 1984, chloride concentrations were about 4,500 mg/L (fig. 38). The rise and fall of chloride concentrations in well 126S indicates that the position of the freshwater -saltwater interface 52 347 probably fluctuates in response to rainfall and withdrawals from wells. During extremely dry periods, .the interface moves toward the well field. The amount of movement, however, may be small. Chloride concentration in salin- ity observation well 125S, located 1,000 feet west of 126S, remained vir- tually unchanged between 1979 and 1984 (fig. 38). W 35,000 Q J 30,000 J z 25,000 Z(r 0 W 20,000 Q J Z W 15,000 W 0. 0 z 0 10,000 W 5,000 0 0 WELL 119S '-s 1 � WELL 126 �--�----�----_-- WELL 125S 1979 1980 1981 1982 1983 1984 Figure 38. --Chloride concentrations in water from three salinity observation wells, 1979-84. Chloride concentrations in the Vero Beach well field in June 1981 and June 1984 are shown in figures 39 and 40. Excluding the area east of the well field, the highest chloride concentrations generally occur south of Main Canal. Concentrations are lowest in the area of the airstrip (fig. 39), coincident with the area of maximum drawdown in the well field. The low chloride concentrations in the area of maximum drawdown may be due to a high recharge rate that captures relatively high quality rainfall in that area. Pumping, therefore, causes the water table to decline and thus provides room for fresh recharge water to be stored. A comparison of the chloride maps in figures 39 and 40 indicate that the position of the 1,000 mg/L chloride line did not change appreciably between 1981 and 1984. Chloride concentrations of water in most wells in the Vero Beach well field have changed little in recent time, (see fig. 27 as an example). Between 1976 and 1983, the average chloride concentration increased about 36 mg/L in six production wells and was unchanged in four others. The increases in chloride concentrations were from scattered wells and are probably related to the increase in well field pumpage from 5.44 Mgal/d in 1976 to 8.00 Mgal/d in 1983 (fig. 27). 53 348 0 0 L'tI Mmtp INDIAN PIV'5R 1 imm�lr 11,�"llamoma Q AVMHHOIH SJNIN Z q O\ Mt M 54 U) �E v • o _rn V z Z yE C O ow �. Q E° zw w p o Z O N I c ON U I 0 L3 °U a J /1 J o 0 0 U9 LO L3 3 LL X VA Lu 25 z- EI®EM® 00 N 54 mmmmmm 0.. '� Im I "MHDIH SONIN 55 0 M 41 v 0 U 7 aco o� CD �_ �. c d L 0 L U 2 vm LL - N �E v .c o o rn Z t-_ "E O N -� Oµ1 d C f Q� O Z �� z W WO O C y VLL O N ( d_ I U Zy i I c i U 1 0 0 p V d DO O 0 0 r N O LLJ 3 X o v n LO 0 M 41 v 0 U 7 aco o� CD �_ �. c d L 0 L U 2 vm LL - Potential Development Tibbals (1978, p. 11) related evapotranspiration to the depth of the water table in east central Florida. Assuming this expression is valid for Indian River County where the water table averages 2 feet below land surface, evapotranspiration in the county is about 42 in/yr (inches per year). If the 42 in/yr of evapotranspiration is subtracted from an average rainfall of about 52 in/yr for eastern Indian River County, and assuming no runoff, the remainder of about 10 in/yr is net natural recharge to the surficial aquifer system in eastern Indian River County. On the basis of hydrologic characteristics of the 140-mi2 area that lies between U.S. Highway 1 and I-95, and assuming the surficial aquifer system receives 10 in/yr of natural recharge in that area, about 67 Mgal/d of water is theoretically available for withdrawal from the system in eastern Indian River County. It should be recognized that the estimate of availability was obtained from a simplified solution of a complex problem. The theoretical and actual amount of water available for withdrawal may differ considerably due to the many factors not considered. For example, not all the theoretical amount of water available can be withdrawn --some water is retained in the aquifer. Also, if the natural recharge rate is altered by development, additional or lesser amounts of water may be available. However, the amount indicated implies that sufficient water for public supply may be available for future use in the county if withdrawals are properly managed. In east Indian River County, high -yielding wells completed in the surficial aquifer system are most likely to be found along the Atlantic Coastal Ridge west of U.S. Highway 1. In places, however, water quality there may not be acceptable because of high concentrations of undesirable constituents. Wells that tap both the clastic zone and the shallow rock zone will probably be the most productive. In places, uncontrolled flowing wells that tap the Floridan aquifer system have apparently allowed high -chloride water to intrude into the surficial aquifer system. Some of'these wells have been plugged by the St. Johns River Water Management District as part of their well plugging program. Problems relating to saltwater intrusion of the surficial aquifer system could possibly be avoided or lessened if (1) all new wells are tested for saltwater during installation and production, (2) all unused wells are plugged from bottom to top to prevent the upward migration of saltwater and, (3) the current (1985) monitoring program is continued. GEOHYDROLOGY OF THE FLORIDAN AQUIFER SYSTEK Description of the Hydrologic Units About 65 percent of all ground water used in the county is from the Floridan aquifer system. In this report, the terminology and definitions relating to the Floridan aquifer system used by Miller (1986) are closely followed but with a few exceptions. The Floridan aquifer system consists of limestone and dolomite, about 2,800 feet thick, that commonly yields abundant supplies of water to wells. Previous to a recent study of the Tertiary limestone aquifer system in the southeastern states, the Floridan aquifer 56 351 O N 0 O 00 N O M in M tf') d - io LO 0 O 00 OP", M 03 r' N N �a O IW W m O z U W W Y O �I m •N • N to I i eq OM) 00 V-1030SO � IU N ° BIW w • U c D J 1 E=3 — I I `5 Deo 06 y I I �o I 1 J ��N Q — I 0 7 ,0 E o ° i 0 3 ay.�° 3 1 U- ° ° ya � °0a� Q..�+y O0.11) — N� O O p a) d OZ r y d D++w V O G 3 C j 0 C Z D CL c 0i t.� I ° d a.., m Q U 00 I L :D own(.) �.. 9. 3 QQI N X �5 • W — O 00 r O M 00 M O LO d •� N t0 M M 0 • M 10 O� to O C-4 tO M O O O O N N 00 M O N• N ;7) N to • M• O M M M �W • oO M M M d I — �N I CR • O/ • I • �rn O OP", M 03 r' N N �a O IW W m O z U W W Y O �I m •N • N to I i eq OM) 00 V-1030SO � IU N ° BIW w • U c D J 1 E=3 — I I `5 Deo 06 y I I �o I 1 J ��N Q — I 0 7 ,0 E o ° i 0 3 ay.�° 3 1 U- ° ° ya � °0a� Q..�+y O0.11) — N� O O p a) d OZ r y d D++w V O G 3 C j 0 C Z D CL c 0i t.� I ° d a.., m Q U 00 I L :D own(.) �.. 9. 3 QQI N X �5 • W — O to O O LO d d M M 0 0 N N 57 U - eq kn M system was termed the "Floridan aquifer" (Miller, 1986, p. B44). Miller (1986, p. B45) describes the Floridan aquifer system as a vertically continuous sequence of generally high permeability carbonate rocks, mostly of middle and late Tertiary age, that are several orders of magnitude more permeable than the rocks that bound the system above and below. Though the Floridan aquifer system is reported to generally cross formation and age boundaries, Miller (1986, p. B46) reports that, regionally, the top of the system is the Suwannee Limestone, but if absent, is the Ocala Limestone. Accordingly, in Indian River County, the Floridan aquifer system in descending order consists of the Suwannee Limestone (where present, fig. 41), Ocala Limestone, Avon Park Formation, Oldsmar Formation, and part of the Cedar Keys Formation (Miller, 1986, p. B46). The lower part of the Avon Park Formation was formerly known as the Lake City Limestone. Because of sparse control and the interfingering of key marker beds, the base of the Floridan aquifer system is difficult to ascertain. One oil test well (well 172F) drilled to basement rock, and one injection well (well 32F) finished in the Oldsmar Formation are the only wells known to penetrate below the Avon Park Formation in Indian River County. Because less -permeable carbonate rocks consistently occur as a unit within the Floridan aquifer system in peninsular Florida, Miller (1986, p. B45) separated the system in descending order into the Upper Floridan aquifer, a middle semiconfining unit, and the Lower Floridan aquifer. The Upper Floridan aquifer ranges in thickness from about 350 feet in the south- western part of the county to about 650 feet in the northeast. The top of the Upper Floridan is the Suwannee Limestone in the eastern part of Indian River County and the Ocala Limestone in the west (fig. 41). The top general- ly slopes to the southeast and ranges in altitude from about -200 to -500 feet. The surface is apparently irregular due to erosion and dissolution. East of the Indian River fault trace (fig. 41), the altitude of the top of the Floridan aquifer system is as low as -650 feet (in the southeast corner of the county) --about 250 feet lower than the surface west of the fault trace (fig. 11). For this investigation, the middle semiconfining unit is identified as a dense dolomitic zone of variable thickness and low permeability and porosity that generally occurs near the middle of the Avon Park Formation. Geophysi- cal logs indicate that the middle semiconfining unit ranges from about 20 to 120 feet in thickness. The logs also suggest that the top of the unit ranges widely in altitude (-613 to -1,450 feet). According to Miller (1986, p. B65), the Lower Floridan aquifer consists of a zone of low and high permeability subzones that lie between the middle semiconfining unit and the Sub -Floridan confining unit (lower confining unit of Miller, 1986) that underlies the Lower Floridan aquifer. The Sub -Floridan confining unit is a massively bedded anhydrite of extremely low permeability that is in the upper part of the Cedar Keys Formation (Miller, 1986, p. B46). Little information is available on the thickness of the Lower Floridan aquifer. Miller (1986, pl. 32) shows that the Lower Floridan aquifer in Indian River County ranges from about 1,600 to 2,000 feet in thickness and thickens to the northwest. Well 172F is the only well known to completely penetrate the Cedar Keys. There, the altitude of the base of the Lower Floridan aquifer is about -3,100 feet. 58 353 Hydraulic Properties The hydraulic properties of the middle semiconfining unit and the Lower Floridan aquifer of the Floridan aquifer system are poorly known, so discussion of these properties relates mostly to the better-known character- istics of the Upper Floridan aquifer. Variations in the hydrologic charac- teristics of the rock strata within the Floridan aquifer system are complex and are closely related to the geologic framework of the system. The porosity and permeability of the rock strata that comprise the system result from combinations of (1) the original texture of the rock; (2) processes that have acted on the rock, such as dolomitization and recrystallization; (3) joints, fractures, and faults; and (4) mineral solution or precipita- tion. Most of the hydraulic (and water -quality) variations found in the Floridan aquifer system in Indian River County probably occur because of one or a combination of the above factors. The combinations that are in effect may cause considerable variation in yield and water quality in nearby wells of equal depth. Flow -meter data show that water -producing zones within a borehole are typically discrete and may occur at different altitudes in adjacent boreholes. However, some boreholes contribute water throughout. The permeability of the Upper Floridan aquifer is reported to be generally higher than that of the Lower Floridan (Miller, 1986, p. B54). The most productive water yielding zones are probably in the Avon Park Formation. The rate of ground -water circulation is relatively high in the Upper Floridan aquifer compared to circulation in the Lower Floridan aquifer, but flow logs indicate some wells that penetrate the Lower Floridan obtain a high percentage of their yield from that part of the aquifer system. Except east of the Indian River fault trace, (on the downthrown side of the fault), wells more than 700 feet deep in the eastern part of the county are probably completed in the Lower Floridan aquifer. These deeper wells were probably installed because the Upper Floridan could not supply sufficient water for a particular need (chiefly citrus irrigation). Yields of wells that tap the Floridan aquifer system can be related to the specific capacity of the well, and in an approximate manner, to the transmissivity of the penetrated aquifer. Transmissivity and associated data that can be used to determine hydraulic properties of the Floridan aquifer system are available for five test sites in Indian River County (fig. 42 and table 5). In addition, Tibbals (1981, fig. 6) determined a model -derived transmissivity range of 100,000 to 200,000 ft2/d for the Upper Floridan aquifer in Indian River County based on a regional -scale model calibration. Planert and Aucott (1985, p. 19) reported a transmissivity of 10,000 ft2/d for well site 216F in Brevard County near northwestern Indian River County. For a model calibration, the area bordering northern Indian River County was assigned a transmissivity value of 65,000 ft2/d by Planert and Aucott (1985, p. 47) for both the Upper and Lower Floridan aquifers. The highest transmissivity reported in the county (1.5 x 106 ft2/d) was from an aquifer test run on an injection well (32F) completed in the Boulder Zone (Kohout, 1965)--a zone within the Lower Floridan aquifer consisting of high permeability, fractured, and cavernous dolomite near the base of the Oldsmar Formation. The Boulder Zone at that site occurs at a depth interval of about 2,400 to 3,000 feet. Miller (1986, p. B68), reports that the 59 354 I N 0 0 Oo N LO N mvg I 00 `d10�0S0 O w m Q I lJ.l W Y 0 �_ �• V) • W W O I O O r N • 1- — I 0 1 LP o U � �E O Y 0 ac "2.0 — W 0 L N O O Z !O m ' _ � `r0+ E C O O d c Z T -0 O 04 �l v 0w O > 04 r �• Q J O 0-0 Z *r � U) cn 0 ng LL O M X W 1 — 1 r • ul 0 I0 to w I i rn CD U J ID — o r• LO N mvg I 00 `d10�0S0 O w m Q I lJ.l W Y 0 �_ �• V) • o O I O O r N • 1- — I 1 �E O 0 ac "2.0 — W 0 L N O O Z W ;? ' _ � `r0+ E C O O d c Z T -0 O o c d v 0w O > � O_Q) a LLI , J O Z cn 3 ng LL O M X W 1 — 1 0 M 0 N kn kn M N N a� L Q Q 0 0 c 0 0 U 0 c a U) N `m v 0 c 0 v 0 <L N s c v N 0 a E 0 v N 3 O U D d 0 U U U (D Cl. V) I I N d� N irn L- Table 5.--Transmissivities of the Floridan aquifer system at five sites in Indian River County [ft2/d — feet squared per day] Refer- Depth of ence Well Site Transmis- Storage well (feet letter No. identification sivity coeffi- below land Source of data (fig. 42) No. (ft2/d) cient surface) A 32F 273510080285502 1,500,000 --- -4 13,005 CH2M Hill (1979) B 37F 273526080240701 50,000 4 x 10 745 Geraghty and _4 Miller (1981b) OF 273536080240101 56,800 3.9 x 10.4 704 Do. C 137F 274445080235901 .7,500 5 x 10-3 1,000 Bermes (1958) 138F 274447080235301 4,800 1 x 10_4 860 Do. D 150F 274524080240801 17,600 6 x 10 960 Seaburn and Robertson (1983a) 154F 274532080241801 44,100 --- -3 1,000 Do. E 186F 274659080244301 19,400 1.4 x 10_3 700 Bermes (1958) 187F 274700080243901 20,100 1 x 10-3 1,000 Do. 188F 274700080245101 20,100 1.4 x 10 860 Do. 'Interval tested was the 2,400- to 3,005 -foot depth. Boulder Zone is commonly found at depths of about 2,500 to 3,000 feet in south Florida, and that the. transmissivity of the entire thickness of the zone may exceed 107 ft2/d. The zone contains saline water, and is widely used as a receiving unit for municipal and other liquid wastes along the southeast coast of Florida. Specific capacity data are more easily determined than transmissivity data, and are therefore more frequently available. The range of values of specific capacities of wells in the Floridan aquifer system in the county is large (fig. 42) and shows little areal pattern. The variability of specific capacity values is probably related to well diameter and depth of penetration but is probably due primarily to the irregular distribution and permeability of producing intervals in individual wells. Specific capacities of 37 .wells range from 1 to 200 (gal/min)/f t and the median is 67 (gal/min)/ft (table 6). The map showing specific capacities (fig. 42) suggests lower than average specific capacities in the western part of the county, higher than average values in the central part, and probably low values east of the Indian River fault trace. Flow rates of individual wells are usually indicative of the hydraulic characteristics of the aquifer penetrated, so high and low flow rates from wells of equivalent depth and diameter generally indicate correspondingly high and low specific capacities or transmissivities of the aquifer. Measured flow rates of wells that tap the Floridan aquifer system range from 30 to 2,000 gal/min with a median of 650 gal/min. The largest reported flow rate in the county is about 6,000 gal/min from an injection well (well 30F) at a depth of 1,350 feet (CH2M Hill, 1979). Flow rates of wells are not only related to hydraulic characteristics of the yielding zones of the 61 356 Table 6. --Specific capacity test data of selected wells that tan the Floridan 28F 273501080302101 aquifer system 1.5 10.5 1,600 152 42F [gal/min = gallon per minute; (gal/min)ft — gallon per minute per foot] 6 400 67 47F 273615080283501 8 10 1 9 300 33 Shut-in Flowing 20 14 4 10 1,800 180 water water 6 8 1 Well Well Casing level level Draw- Flow- Specific No. identification diam- (feet (feet down rate capacity 12 No. eter above above (feet) (gal/ [(gal/ 8 800 (inches) land land 4 min) min)/ft] 4 50 12 surface) surface) 4 11 6 5 70 14 77F 273821080273901 4 9 5 7F 273335080280901 8 12 0 12 650 54 12F 273357080274901 8 12 1 11 700 64 20F 273423080332201 8 13 4 9 850 94 21F 273430080195601 6 30 0 30 30 1 26F 273459080401201 12 15 10 5 1,000 200 28F 273501080302101 8 12 1.5 10.5 1,600 152 42F 273539080301901 4 12 6 6 400 67 47F 273615080283501 8 10 1 9 300 33 53F 273633080364301 20 14 4 10 1,800 180 54F 273639080261501 6 8 1 7 450 64 57F 273710080230601 8 29 4 25 450 18 61F 273726080371501 10 16 4 12 1,800 150 64F 273741080382701 10 15 7 8 800 100 72F 273814080245201 4 10 6 4 50 12 76F 273819080260101 4 11 6 5 70 14 77F 273821080273901 4 9 5 4 50 12 80F 273827080322001 8 12 5 7 240 34 84F 273833080461901 6 12 10 2 40 20 95F 273927080465701 8 13 1 12 600 50 102F 274008080255301 8 9 1 8 750 94 104F 274023080291401 10 11 0 11 1,700 154 107F 274055080281301 5 13 4 9 285 32 11OF 274115080291401 10 11 0 11 1,700 154 112F 274121080241701 6 28 16 12 750 62 115F 274156080344301 12 15 9 6 1,000 167 117F 274203080292901 12 13 0 13 2,000 154 119F 274210080400301 10 22 17 5 800 160 123F 274250080354401 12 13 8 5 950 190 126F 274302080371501 10 20 14 6 1,000 167 134F 274350080364501 12 16 11 5 1,000 200 136F 274436080395801 10 20 15 5 800 160 140F 274449080240001 5 24 16 8 280 35 149F 274522080304301 4 14 10 4 125 31 151F 274528080395801 10 20 15 5 600 120 155F 274534080251101 6 36 8 28 200 7 167F 274607080264001 6 21 1 20 150 7 18OF 274642080453601 3 11 4 7 50 7 216F 275119080482401 12 -- 8.9 280 32 62 357 wellbore, but also to pipe and wellbore hydraulics. Generally, the largest flow rates are from large -diameter wells (10 inches or more) and large diameter (8 inches or more) discharge pipes. Most wells that tap the Floridan aquifer system are capable of yielding several hundred gallons of water per minute without significant drawdown. Description of Wells that Tap the System The records of 250 wells in the Floridan aquifer system, which are stored in the Geological Survey computer files and shown in Supplementary Data II, represent only a small percentage of the wells that have been drilled in the study area. Uninventoried wells probably number several thousand. Some general observations pertaining to wells that tap the Floridan aquifer system in Indian River County can be made from field observations and from available records. Depths of wells in the Floridan aquifer system in Indian River County are generally constrained by drilling costs and the potential of degradation of water quality with increased depth. The proposed use of water and the productivity of a well are the chief considerations for any well installation. Therefore, wells are generally drilled to meet or to most closely approximate required yields and water -quality needs within economic limits. Inventoried wells range in depth from 233 to 1,272 feet with a median depth of 700 feet. A report by Bermes (1958, p. 32) indicates that in about 1950 wells in the Floridan aquifer system on the mainland were about 600 to 700 feet deep. Records of new wells (drilled since the 1981 drought) indicate that typical depths have increased --many wells extend to depths of 900 feet or more. The probable reason for the deeper wells is the demand for higher yields. Wells completed in the Floridan aquifer system that yield excessively saline water are usually plugged or abandoned. However, in places where a modest amount of acceptable water can be obtained from the upper part of the well, it may be more feasible to plug the bottom section of the well to seal off the lower saline zone rather than abandoning the well. Well casings generally extend only to depths that allow the wellbore to remain open --usually into the Hawthorn Formation. Therefore, the bottom 600 to 800 feet of many wells in the Floridan aquifer system is frequently "open -hole" or uncased. Casing diameters range from 2 to 24 inches. Wells drilled since 1981 are generally 8 to 12 inches in diameter. Casings are made of steel, black iron, or plastic. Corrosion of metal well casings have caused many older wells to fail, so the use of plastic casing has become more prevalent in recent years. Burns (1983, p. 30) reports that in Lee County (southwest Florida) the life expectancy of steel -cased wells is 20 to 25 years, and that the corrosion of steel casing is most intensive at the upper part of the surficial aquifer system. As mentioned previously, corroded -through well casings could cause intrusion of water from the Floridan aquifer system into the surficial aquifer system. More than 90 percent of the inventoried wells in the Floridan aquifer system are used for irrigation. Twelve wells are used as a source of water for reverse osmosis treatment for public -water supply. The city of Vero Beach blends water from two wells in the Floridan with water from the surficial aquifer system for public supply. 63 358 Few wells are equipped with pumps because water levels of most wells in the Floridan aquifer system stand above land surface. Water from the wells would discharge freely if not valved shut. Wells generally flow at sufficient rates to supply needed yields. In this report, wells that discharge freely are termed "flowing wells." When valved shut, flowing wells are termed "shut-in." Potentiometric Surface The potentiometric surface of the Upper Floridan aquifer fluctuates in response to changes in rates of recharge and rates of discharge. The major components that cause water -surface fluctuations are rainfall, pumpage, and, near the coast, tidal changes. Generally, short-term components are superimposed on long-term changes in the potentiometric surface of the Upper Floridan aquifer. Pumpage and rainfall can cause long- and short-term changes in the potentiometric surface. The regional configuration of the potentiometric surface of the Upper Floridan aquifer in May 1981 is shown in figure 14. In Indian River County, the direction of water movement in the Upper Floridan aquifer is mainly eastward. Figures 43 and 44 show the potentiometric surface of the Upper Floridan aquifer in the county for May 1981 and May 1983. Comparison of the May 1981 potentiometric surface map (reflecting the 1980-81 drought) and the May 1983 map (reflecting above-average rainfall for 1982-83) shows that the potentiometric surface generally ranged 2 to 4 feet lower in May 1981 than in May 1983. The mound shown on the potentiometric surface in May 1981 (fig. 43) is probably residual from the previously high levels. In the recharge area of the Floridan in Indian River County on the Lake Wales Ridge (fig. 14), September is normally the last month of the wet season and May is the last month of the dry season. Generally, the Upper Floridan aquifer is most stressed by pumping in May because, by then, the dry season has extended for about 7 months, and agricultural irrigation is heaviest. The potentiometric surface in May generally ranges in altitude from about 30 feet along the coastline to about 40 feet near the western county line. The depressions in the potentiometric surface in the eastern half of the county, as shown by the May 1983 potentiometric surface (fig. 44), reflect pumping stress from irrigation. In Indian River County, potentiometric contours generally shift slightly eastward toward the Atlantic Ocean between May and September because of the recharge from summer (wet season) rains and the associated curtailed local irrigation pumping.. Water Levels General Water levels in wells in discharge areas typically rise as the depth of penetration of the well increases, but few data are available to quantify differences in the levels in shallow and deeply penetrating wells in the Floridan aquifer system in the county. Geraghty and Miller, Inc. (1981b) reported that the water level of a well that is 901 feet deep (well 41F) was 3.5 feet higher in December 1980 than that in a nearby well 740 feet deep (well 37F). Water levels of wells cased into the Lower Floridan aquifer are probably at least several feet higher in altitude than the levels of wells 64 359 O N 0 O 00 N O LO io LO ZD 00 N It o '0 w M 34 U ' IW I� ' W 0 m 0 O q1- _ -�-- U 00 <f1030S0 F W W U Q V- 0r Z 0 0 o io w in o d d 14- ` j ooaa�' g ' AJAX� 0 r- O q1- t2� oe Z O �a F Z3Lpvv� U Q 1 0r Z 76 F;'� Z,= C� 0,00 g W 3 d X M W o io o in o LO 14- 0 0 0 r- 04 N N 65 95, r - co rn v o - v C: v v 0 o� a a D .0 0 a� U v w .` 0 a° I I 7 O� O N 0 O OD N 0 LO ro O d - to q - O LO LO 0 O 00 h..: V — V) tY R Rl O..•'.:.:. :.Aj o N U O M M LO J Y M�4 N N N "M V) 010 1 �N co a l > 0 a M M I cr ago o rz v Dam Ww0 O�-0 LOcrUa l(� Z F- 'tl• d .O. In I I 0 wLaz it MO 0V o l0 N to 1a -o PO E 00 LOW LLI crm M I I a9� IL In tea, InrOD ` i / r i 36 '�'�'"F- r Nt-� 0 z 4u L'i I /o �` > — N r cLi� m j_- atv. a,OOZ > N '>V N >.� p N lLJ' ' .•ii' ' U 7 h O Uo04? �i in the Upper Floridan aquifer. However, most wells in the Upper and Lower Floridan aquifers are cased only into the Hawthorn Formation; so water levels, particularly in the Lower Floridan, are resultant combination heads. The hydrographs of two long-term observation wells completed in the Floridan aquifer system illustrate water -level fluctuations in a heavily irrigated area (well 23F in fig. 45) and the fluctuations in an area little affected by pumping (well 168F in fig. 46). (See fig. 47 for locations.) A comparison of the hydrographs and analysis of water -level data collected for compilation of biannual potentiometric surface maps show that September water levels generally range from 2 to 5 feet higher than May levels. However, in heavily pumped areas, water levels may decline as much as 15 feet between September and May if rainfall is deficient. The rainfall deficiencies of about 12 inches in 1980 and about 7 inches in 1981, and the probable effects of regional pumping, resulted in a record low May 1981 water level altitude (36.67 feet) in well 168F (fig. 46). Water levels in many other wells in the county also fell to record lows in May 1981. Water -Level Trends In Indian River County, long-term trends of water levels in the Floridan aquifer system are due to prolonged change in recharge and to water -use activities such as pumping for irrigation and public supply (development). Long-term trends due to development are difficult to ascertain because trends may be masked by the effect of variations in recharge. Water levels in the mostly undeveloped western part of the county are about 8 to 10 feet lower than those estimated for predevelopment time in the early 19301s. Water -level data in table 7 shows that levels in the Floridan aquifer system in eastern Indian River County have declined about 16 to 24 feet in the 50 -year period 1934 to 1984. The greatest decline occurred in the period 1934 to 1971. Since 1971, levels have apparently stabilized. At Avon Park in Highlands County, which is in a recharge area of the Floridan aquifer system, water levels show a similar, but greater, pattern of decline. There, water levels declined about 28 feet between 1934 and 1978. The hydrograph of well 168F (fig. 46) indicates no overall trend in the period 1976 to 1985. Brown and Reece (1979, pl. 3) reported no significant upward or downward trend of water levels in the Floridan aquifer system in the period 1970 to 1977 in adjacent St. Lucie County. The hydrograph of well 23F (fig. 45), in the Indian River Water Control District, suggests a downward trend from 1959 to 1971 and possibly an upward trend since 1972. In the future, water levels in the Floridan aquifer system may decline in the Fellsmere area because of added stress on the system by planned expansion of agricultural irrigation. Water levels may also decline in the vicinity of the county's Oslo Road reverse osmosis plant as pumpage there for public supply increases. However, in some areas of the county water levels in the Floridan aquifer system probably will rise because of reduced irrigation pumpage due to urbanization. In the Indian River Water Control District and the Wabasso Beach area (fig. 1), for example, water levels will probably rise because irrigation pumpage will continue to decline as more citrus groves are replaced with urban -type developments that use public - supply systems. The amount of water used for public -water supply is not 67 362 ao a� SO. rn -O O U::::::::::: r U 9• d q) �gv O ` 3 0� O� U y0,. O `t +, I O O _ o z m 0 >, O z Z-. .-1 � N .•I O :I �� 01 h: Do to t0 rn tL L0 M � N � W: I to3 I rn rn N :I Obi rn 0 to rn rn Ln rn dN 1t M pr)M M M N N -13A3-1 V3S 3AO8V 133A NI '13/31 2AMLVM 68 N 4 co rn N 7 C: Q t O N Lt. n N 3 .c a� i O Q 3 v c a� I t c O I I ori a� o� LZ expected to equal the amount previously used for irrigation in the foreseeable future; so, in those places, water levels will probably rise unless additional demands are placed on the aquifer. 46 J W 45 J 44 w 43 0 Q 42 L 41 LL Z 40 36 WELL 168F 1976 1977 1978 1979 1980 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 Figure 46. --Water level in well 168E (USGS Observation Well IR 189), 1976-85. Water Quality General Most of the water that recharges the Floridan aquifer system in Indian River County originates as rainfall on the Lake Wales Ridge, to the west, in Polk County (fig. 14). The mineralization of the water increases as it moves eastward toward the coast and by the time it reaches the discharge area that includes Indian River County, the water quality in the Floridan aquifer system contains relatively high concentrations of dissolved -solids. Saline water ranging from slightly saline to brine is present at varying depths beneath the entire county. In places, water in the Upper Floridan aquifer is fresh, particularly in the upper part. Salinity increases with depth and is a function of flushing out of the ancient seawater trapped in the sediments during an earlier geologic time (Sprinkle, 1982). Water movement is generally sluggish (Miller, 1986, p. B63) in the Lower Floridan aquifer where little flushing has occurred and the water is briney. 69 364 I 0 CN OD 00 CN I LO n U') 4- b LO �b U-) 0 0 00 70 u -2 0 4) C71 0 0 V) 0 U) 0 '0 u O E Q 4- m 0' 0 _0 2 0 U- 0 .2 0 u T U- 1 LO Lr) LL 0 LL. Go V) z 04 W W w U- N 00 cq z': m a. z tD oGEPU- w Z 0 0 W LLJ 0 LL- LO — _j 0 I L: JC u - (,D to LL - w w -Y 0) 0 tr) LL- re) m tn U- LL- C14 U- cli LL- 0 0 C'4 v CN LL - LL. 0 0 .-LL- 04 CD IW LL- U -r 1. 3: C*4 co C14 L 0, LO x LL- 0 0 0) D a la.D.T LL- CDU- C14 'o 00 a .2 Ll 70 u -2 0 4) C71 0 0 V) 0 U) 0 '0 u O E Q 4- m 0' 0 _0 2 0 U- 0 .2 0 u T U- 1 LO Lr) LL 0 LL. Go S2 8 z 04 x w U- N 00 z': m a. z tD w Z 0 0 W LLJ w W U) z z 0 I JC u - (,D '00 V1030SO w w -Y 0 70 u -2 0 4) C71 0 0 V) 0 U) 0 '0 u O E Q 4- m 0' 0 _0 2 0 U- 0 .2 0 u T U- LO Lr) 0 Z S2 8 z 04 x w V, z': m a. z 0 Z 0 0 < LLJ w W U) z z < I JC u - (,D x W 70 u -2 0 4) C71 0 0 V) 0 U) 0 '0 u O E Q 4- m 0' 0 _0 2 0 U- 0 .2 0 u T U- LO Lr) 0 r - CN 04 70 u -2 0 4) C71 0 0 V) 0 U) 0 '0 u O E Q 4- m 0' 0 _0 2 0 U- 0 .2 0 u T U- Table 7.--Ground-water levels at selected sites in Indian River and Highlands Counties, 11934; 1951. 1971. and 1984 [Water levels are in feet above sea level) Avon Park Year Vero Beach Fellsmere Sebastion (Highlands Co.) 1934 48 (Feb) 55 (Aug)' 46 (Aug)1 105 (Feb)2 1951 40 (Oct) 48 (Oct) 37 (Oct) 92 (Apr) 1971 28 (May) 34 (May) 30 (May) -- 1984 30 (May) 31 (May) 30 (May) 78 (May) 'From Stringfield (1936). 2Estimated from nearby measurements made in Highlands and Polk Counties. The water quality of a well completed in the Floridan aquifer system is a composite of the quality of water in the various producing zones penetrated by the open borehole. Water -quality data from Bermes (1958), Crain and others (1975), and unpublished data indicate that water from the Floridan aquifer system is generally hard and relatively high in dissolved solids. Most water is of the sodium chloride type. Chloride, bicarbonate, and sulfate are the major anions, and sodium, calcium, and magnesium the major cations. Potassium and strontium are common minor constituents. Trace amounts of other ions are also present. The distribution and values of salinity as measured by dissolved -solids concentrations are similar to chloride concentrations in the Floridan aquifer system. Concentrations of chloride and dissolved solids commonly exceed the Florida Department of Environmental Regulation (1982) maximum contaminant level for public drinking water systems (250 mg/L for chloride and 500 mg/L for dissolved solids where alternate supplies of lower concentration are available). Lateral intrusion of saltwater from the Indian River or the Atlantic Ocean into the Floridan aquifer system is not possible under current conditions because of the aquifer's high head along the coast (at about the 30 -foot altitude), and because the freshwater -saltwater interface is a considerable distance offshore. The high Floridan heads, responsible for discharging conditions throughout the county, also prevent pollutants on the land surface from moving downward into the Floridan. Pollutants could be introduced into the aquifer from recharge areas, mostly outside the county, or heavy pumping could cause local upconing of very saline water from depth. Variations of Chloride Concentration in Wells Sprinkle (1982) reports that significant chemical differences may be found in the water from nearby wells, or from the same well from year to year, in the area that includes Indian River County. Therefore, recognition of a trend in chloride concentration in the water from individual wells is difficult to ascertain. An example is the water from well 20F (fig. 48) in which chloride concentrations of water from well 20F (fig. 48) ranged from 71 366 700 600 500 300 W ~J 200 X W 300 N Q 200 J 100 i Z z 600 0 Q 500 rr W 400 U Z 0 U 300 W 0 200 0 = 900 U 800 700 600 CONTINUOUSLY FLOWING WELLS wwwwwwwwwwwww��.�.�� YY■►\��iiY■Gww�.�Y��■i�QA� w�ww�� www��w wwwwwwww� �wwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww� �wwwww■�wwwwwwwwwwwww� APERIODICALLY FLOWING WELLS � wr��w■■wwwwwww■� �n►m>wt=r�wwwwwwww■■wwwwwwww wwwwwwwwwwww■■r�www■■www wwwwww • . wwwn�www■. • . w wwwwww■�www■+�wwww�_ w ��■�uYY�wwwww� ■wwwwv�..Raw ww■■wwww�•�w:��.■■��■�wirr■w� ww■�www�1' �wwi��l��{ �� ww�awww • Figure 48. --Chloride concentrations in water from continuously flowing and aperiodically flowing wells. 72 367 210 to 540 mg/L during a 14 -month sampling period. Fluctuations of chloride concentration in the water from a well may be related to head changes and changes in flow contributions of producing zones. Also, pumping during the dry season could lower heads enough to cause some upconing of saline water -- particularly in wells completed in the Lower Floridan aquifer. Variations in the chloride concentration of water from a well sampled periodically may also be due to sampling technique or to the geohydrologic characteristics of the well. Water -quality sampling techniques are designed to provide data that are representative of water in the aquifer. For this study, samples were taken from either shut-in or actively flowing wells. Samples from shut-in wells were taken at the wellhead by opening a valve and allowing water from the well to flow. Samples from flowing wells were taken from the discharge pipe or from a spigot on the well. Most sampling was done periodically -- generally for chloride concentration determinations. An important factor in sampling is to ensure that only native aquifer water is sampled. Barraclough (1962, p. 75) reports that in Seminole County (central Florida), the most important index of chloride concentration in water from some flowing wells is not changes in water level but the period the well is allowed to flow prior to sampling. Chloride concentrations of water from an observation well in Seminole County ranged from 65 mg/L at a flow period of 5 minutes to 290 mg/L for flows longer than 5 minutes. For this study, prior to sampling, a shut-in well was allowed to dis- charge at least long enough to evacuate and replace the water stored in the wellbore with fresh formation water. For example, for an 8 -inch -diameter well 1,000 feet deep that discharges 500 gals/min, the required time is about 5 minutes. Wellhead discharge waters that have attained a steady temperature.or specific conductance generally indicate that the wellbore has been completely flushed. Most wells that tap the Floridan aquifer system in Indian River County are periodically used during dry weather periods and freeze periods. When not in use, the wells are shut-in to prevent needless discharge. Chloride concentrations of water in these periodically shut-in wells appear to vary more than the concentration in wells that flow continuously. Periodically, open wells may allow high chloride concentration water in a deep -producing zone of the Floridan aquifer system to invade an upper, better quality zone during shut-in periods. As mentioned previously, deep - producing zones in Floridan aquifer system have higher heads than the shallow producing zones. Many irrigation wells tap the Lower Floridan aquifer but are cased only to about the middle of the Hawthorn Formation. This can allow the higher head, more mineralized, water from a producing zone in the Lower Floridan aquifer to move into and contaminate a better quality producing zone in the Upper Floridan aquifer. Figure 49 illustrates the hypothetical paths of water movement in a periodically open well that penetrates the Upper and Lower Floridan aquifer. Head differentials indicate that a significant potential exists for water from the Floridan aquifer system to intrude into the surficial aquifer system through a break in a casing (fig. 49).. 73 368 - — — — — — — — — - LOWER FLORIDAN AQUIFER — - — — — — — — — — - UPPER FLORIDAN AQUIFER CORRODED THROUGH CASING 3 x in W E WW W W W F- 0 3 CONTRIBUTING ZONE 0 Z C xv� W W z C3 c 0 0> 2 IN ---- WATER TABLE --r — SURFICIAL AQUIFER SYSTEM INTERMEDIATE CONFINING UNIT UPPER FLORIDAN AQUIFER MIDDLE SEMICONFINING UNIT POMETRIC SURFACES -- SURFACES 1 LAND SURFACE BOTTOM OF CASING ZONE f LOWER FLORIDAN AQUIFEzRkZT= DISCHARGING SHUT—IN WELL WELL Figure 49. --Hypothetical paths of ground—water movement in wells that penetrate both the Upper and Lower Floridan aquifer. 74 369 The volume and quality of water that moves into or intrudes a receiving zone (fig. 49) in a shut-in or flowing well is directly related to head differentials, transmissivities, water density, the water quality of the producing zones, and to time. If a shut-in well is allowed to flow, the time required to evacuate the intruded zone in the Floridan will be longer than the time the well was shut-in. This is due to blending of the water in the intruded zone and the hydraulics of flow in the zone. The plot of the chloride concentrations in water from well 148F (fig. 48) illustrates the effect of shutting -in a flowing well for a period of time. Prior to being shut-in, chloride concentrations ranged from 650 to 680 mg/L. But after the well was shut-in (January 1984), the chloride concentration began to rise, reaching 860 mg/L by mid-February. The chloride concentration remained at 860 mg/L for several months with the well shut-in. After the well was opened and allowed to flow, the chloride concentration declined rapidly to 710 mg/L and continued to decline with time thereafter until it reached the previous concentration of open conditions. The decline in chloride concentration is probably due to the slow release of mixed -quality water from an upper -producing zone that had been intruded by relatively high chloride water from a lower zone. Many wells that flow continuously appear to reach an equilibrium of hydrologic conditions in which temporal and recharge -discharge changes have little influence on the chloride concentration of water in the wells. Chloride concentrations in water from flowing wells 84F, 132F, and 194F (fig. 48) show little fluctuation though their period of record covers several seasons and include seasonal variations in precipitation and pumpage. Water from wells periodically open and wells recently drilled may exhibit considerable variations in chloride concentration because equilibrium conditions have not been attained. (See well 20F in fig. 48, a relatively new well, for example.) Chloride concentrations of the water in recently drilled wells may often increase with time and concomitant decline in head. The period of time required for a well to reach water -quality constancy may vary with the hydrologic environment of the individual well and its use and could be years. Distribution of Chlorides Chloride concentrations of water in the Floridan aquifer system may vary considerably both areally and vertically as well as temporally. Predictions of chloride concentration at a particular location cannot be made with certainty, but generalizations can be made based on patterns of occurrence. Figures 50 and 51 are highly generalized maps that show the distribution of chloride concentrations of water from wells that tap the Upper Floridan aquifer and both the Upper and Lower Floridan aquifers, respectively. Most of the data used to compile the maps were collected in 1983 --some data are from the 1984-85 period. The wells that tap both the Upper and Lower Floridan aquifers probably derive most of their yield from the Lower Floridan which generally contains more highly mineralized water. Chloride concentrations generally increase _slightly with depth in the Upper Floridan aquifer but may increase rapidly with depth in the Lower Floridan. Therefore, the concentrations shown for water mostly from the Lower Floridan 75 370 N O LO 1h O ►n O to O to ►7 �D 0 N N U � v f a u'E ml g q •`c p O i�5 �c Ig M• • - F ;° z°` c t Wc W a 00 O L 00 4):t N m ZNI O N +' I c u a N 0 3 '00 V-1030SO `W X O W JO �Z N • O ►n O to O to ►7 0 0 N N 76 O N Z3 00 N 0 PC) zo O d- O LO in LO 0 O 00 77 ♦ �,` 0 N IIII N O ♦ � ,..III o.14-- co : �I . II�'a`-�1,� it ji INo.S �III� p � 1 g g^IW _ N 11116• o O : . • O D o d • • • J I mt to o • a+' E : 3 rnLn I V)0 I I o �v° tpODo N • p to >lo T a 1 0 � • I Ivo 77 0 0 N IIII N O o.14-- co p � g g^IW N o O • O D o d • p J I mt to o • a+' E : 3 rnLn I V)0 I I o �v° tpODo N • p to >lo T a 1 0 � • I Ivo n M • I I o I p p U') • p oo Ip I � I • 0 10 Op �':W'• In : '''' O OO v :':;'=� J� pat O v c� 1 lCi U Z 0 m N �• O ow U 0 o Eo I W Q LJ I m o 0- 7 v a I L oNLU .- .. I I o c ��a U N g c 3 S2 A "00 `d1030S0 W W =1 x o w U Z • O 77 0 0 N N 77 aquifer are more variable than for water in the Upper Floridan aquifer because differences in well depths may cause large differences in chloride concentration. The highest concentrations for both aquifers are found on the east (downthrown) side of the fault along the Indian River. Chloride concentrations in water from wells that yield mostly from the Upper Floridan aquifer range from 20 to about 1,400 mg/L. The lowest concentrations are in the area of the Talbot terrace (figs. 2 and 50). Concentrations less than 250 mg/L are found in about half the county -- generally in the western, southwestern, and central part. Areas of less than 250 mg/L concentration occur as patches oriented parallel to the coast along the trace of the Atlantic Coastal Ridge (figs. 2 and 50). These patches may be pockets of freshwater that were trapped in the aquifer during a low stand of the sea during the Pleistocene Epoch (Tibbals, in press), or as theorized by Crain and others (1975, p. 49), may represent areas of recharge to the Upper Floridan aquifer. The highest concentration of chloride in water from the Upper Floridan is between the Talbot terrace and the Atlantic Coastal Ridge in the northern part of the county (figs. 2 and 50). The high chloride concentrations found in water from some Upper Floridan aquifer wells may be in those places where the underlying middle semiconfining unit is relatively permeable, thin, or breached. There, pumping could more readily cause upconing of high chloride concentration water from the Lower Floridan aquifer into the Upper Floridan aquifer. Chloride concentrations in water from wells that yield mostly from the Lower Floridan aquifer range from 290 to 2,920 mg/L. In the eastern half of the county, water from these wells generally have chloride concentrations higher than 500 mg/L. Chloride concentrations ranging from 700 to 1,050 mg/L occur in a large area between the Atlantic Coastal Ridge and the Ten - Mile Ridge (fig. 51). Concentrations of 400 mg/L or less occur as a narrow band along the trace of the Atlantic Coastal Ridge in the northern half of the county and a northeast oriented band of 300 mg/L or less is centered at the junction of State Highways 60 and 512. The high chloride concentrations of 910 mg/L in water from well 154F (near Wabasso Beach) and 1,050 mg/L in well 47F (south of State Highway 60 and east of I-95, figs. 1 and 51) may have been caused by their relatively heavy pumping and their greater depth than nearby wells. Trends in Chloride Concentrations The recognition of any from wells is essential t Figure 52 shows the chlorid, Floridan aquifer system. intervals during the period chloride concentrations for time trend in chloride concentrations of water o management of the county's water resources. concentrations of water from 26 wells in the These same wells were sampled at three time 1951-84. The following table gives the average the time intervals. Sampling period Average chloride concentration (mg/L) 1951-52 369 1968-71 424 (increase of 15 percent) 1983-84 451 (increase of 6 percent from 1968-71 and 22 percent from 1951-52) 373 78 Q) v 0 .` w OL m L c v v 0 U- in V) It In LO 0 O 00 c N 79 LO M M 0 0 N (v 79 Chloride concentrations increased more than 10 percent in 11 of the 26 wells between the period 1951-52 and 1968-71, but concentrations increased more than 10 percent in only 5 wells between the period 1968-71 and 1983-84. Crain and others (1975, p. 53) compared chloride concentrations of water from wells in the Floridan sampled in 1951-52 to that of samples collected in 1968-71 and found a small increase in chlorides in the eastern part of the county north of Winter Beach and a small decrease in chlorides south of Winter Beach. Data obtained for this study in 1983-84 shows that chloride concentrations increased about 25 percent in T33S (Township 33 South), R39E (Range 39 East), south of Vero Beach, between the periods 1951-52 and 1983-84. (See fig. 1 for Township and Range locations.) In T32S, R39E--the Vero Beach area --the increase was about 18 percent. In T31S, R39E--the Sebastian area --the chloride concentration decreased by 11 percent. The decrease may be due to the plugging of unused flowing wells. The overall increase in chloride concentration in the three town- ships was only 9 percent between the 1951-52 and the 1983-84 period. Average chloride concentrations in the townships for the three sampling periods are given in the following table. 1951-52 1968-71 1983-84 Township Number Average Number Average Number Average and of wells chloride of wells chloride of wells chloride range sampled (mg/L) sampled (my -/L) sampled (mg_ /L) T31S, R39E T32S, R39E T33S, R39E Total Average of all samples 45 488 13 462 23 436 21 313 16 334 17 370 23 424 14 450 18 529 89 --- 43 --- 58 --- 408 415 445 Data from four Floridan aquifer system wells in a grove at Wabasso Beach show no increase in chloride concentration from the 1940's to 1984. However, the chloride concentration of water from well 177F, completed in the Lower Floridan aquifer, rose from 378 mg/L in 1951 to 540 mg/L in 1983. The chloride concentration in 1969 was 535 mg/L. Chloride concentrations of water in the Upper Floridan. aquifer are increasing in the Vero Beach area. In the city well field, the chloride concentration of water from well 94F increased from 285 mg/L in November 1976 to 384 mg/L in May 1985 (35 percent increase). Chloride concentrations of water from well 93F increased from 300 mg/L in April 1979 to 476 mg/L in May 1985 (59 percent increase). Except for 1950, the following table shows a, progressive upward trend in chloride concentration since 1921 in water from well 73F at the old Vero Beach Power Plant. Year 1921 1924 1949 1950 1951 1983 Month Aug. Oct. -- Oct. Jan. Dec. July Chloride (mg/L) 270 291 455 625 550 630 790 375 80 Well 73F has been out of service and shut-in for many years. High chloride concentration water from the lower part of the well may have substantially infiltrated the upper, better -quality zones. On a countywide basis, the chloride concentrations of water from wells in the Floridan aquifer system have apparently not changed significantly in the 15 -year period 1968 to 1983. Brown and Reece (1979, pl. 6) report that chloride concentrations of water from wells in the Floridan aquifer system did not change significantly during the 20 -year period 1957-77 in the area that includes St. Lucie County --the adjacent county south of Indian River. A few localities and some individual wells have shown increases in chloride concentration, but the increases probably reflect a local condition rather than a general trend. Effect of Irrigation Water from the Floridan Aquifer System on the Quality of Canal Water Crain and others (1975, p. 53) reported that major canals that drain the eastern part of the county had similar water quality. Large quantities of relatively poor quality irrigation water from wells in the Floridan aquifer system commonly mix with higher quality surface water and water from the surficial aquifer system in the canals. However, the quality of water present in a canal at a given time varies widely with the relative propor- tions of rainfall, irrigation water from the Floridan aquifer system, and ground -water contribution from the surficial aquifer system. The variation in water quality, as indicated by specific conductance, was determined for South Canal at 43rd Avenue (fig. 53) from February 1983 to September 1984. The specific conductance of canal water is generally highest during the dry season (November through June) because flow in the canal consists largely of irrigation water from the Floridan aquifer system. During the wet season, much of the canal water is rainfall and surface runoff, and specific conductance is relatively low. Figure 53 shows the effects of discharge from Floridan aquifer system wells and rainfall on the water quality of South Canal. The specific conductance of water in the canal generally ranged from 900 to 1,700 pS/cm (about 250 mg/L and 450 mg/L chloride, respectively). The specific conduct- ance was lowest (540 pS/cm) in October 1983 when the monthly rainfall totaled a record high 15.58 inches. The highest specific conductance of 2,880 pS/cm (about 850 mg/L chloride) was in May 1984 following a month with only 1.02 inches of rain. Large quantities of water from the Floridan aquifer system are apparently used for freeze protection of citrus groves. In December 1983, temperatures dropped below freezing for three consecutive days, December 25, 26, and 27. The conductance of canal water was 2,700 pS/cm on the 27th, but declined to 1,120 MS/cm on January 6th. During part of the dry season, generally about November through February, natural requirements for water by citrus trees diminishes as average daily tempera- tures decline, so little irrigation water is needed. For example, conduct- ances remained comparatively low in November 1983 and January 1984, though rainfall was only 1.58 inches (average is 2.55 inches) and 2.02 inches (average is 2.43 inches), respectively. 81 376 U 0 in N Q Lj UW UF- �Z oW ZU 0 UW a U MN UZ WW a� V)W N O ix U i Z 3,000 2,500 2,000 1,500 1,000 500 Freeze �-Irri ation protection g pumping pumping Irrigation pumping J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S 0 1983 1984 Figure 53. --Specific conductance of water in South Canal at 43rd Avenue and precipitation at Vero Beach. WATER USE General N 16 = 14 U 12 ? 10 Z 8 - 6 J 4 J 2 Z 0 Q IX The main public -water systems in the county are the cities of Vero Beach and Sebastian, and the county plant on Oslo Road. Figure 54 is a graph of the annual pumpage for Vero Beach, 1954-84. An undetermined amount of water used for irrigation originates from the dewatering of marshland. Large tracts of land previously part of the St. Johns Marsh east and south of Blue Cypress Lake are dewatered to grow citrus. Continuous pumping is needed to lower the near -surface water table enough to allow agriculture. Because dewatering is done throughout the year, including the dry season, the amount of water pumped may be large. Some of the water pumped from dewatering is ultimately used for irrigation. 82 377 10 Q D K W 8 I N z O J J 6 Q 0 z 0 J J 4 z Li 0 Q 2 n. i D IL a 1955 1960 1965 1970 1975 1980 1984 Figure 54. --Annual pumpage by the city of Vero Beach, 1954-84. The following table gives the estimated water use in Indian River County for 1984. Total 46.73 105.24 151.97 lExcludes irrigation water obtained from dewatering. 83 378 Ground Surface Water use water water Total (Mgal/d) (Mgal/d) (Mgal/d) (percent) Public 8.5 0 8.5 5.6 Domestic 8.0 0 8.0 5.3 Industrial .23 0 .23 .1 Irrigationl 30 105 135 88.8 Thermoelectric 0 .24 .24 .2 Total 46.73 105.24 151.97 lExcludes irrigation water obtained from dewatering. 83 378 Use of Water from the Floridan Aquifer System for Public -Water Supply Prior to the 1980's, most water from the Floridan aquifer system could be used only for irrigation, because its high mineral content generally made the water nonpotable. However, with the advent of the reverse osmosis method of treatment that eliminates objectionable minerals, and with declin- ing treatment cost, water from the Floridan aquifer system can be used as a source for the production of potable water. In places, particularly along the barrier beach, where the surficial aquifer system cannot provide enough freshwater for public supply, reverse osmosis facilities are often used. In June 1985, the county -owned reverse osmosis treatment plant near Oslo provided about 1 Mgal/d of water from two wells that tap the Floridan aquifer system to its service area south and west of Vero Beach. Another reverse osmosis treatment plant (North Beach Water Company) at Wabasso Beach has supplied about 0.06 Mgal/d of water from two wells in the Floridan aquifer system to the supply system on the Barrier Island between January and May 1985. Irrigation Water Use Approximately 124,000 acres (35 percent) of the total area of Indian River County (351,000 acres) are in agricultural use. About 94,000 acres (76 percent) are irrigated with large quantities of water from wells that tap the Floridan aquifer system. Agricultural land is used chiefly for citrus groves, pasture, and truck farming. Small acreages are used for other types of agriculture (nurseries and tropical -fish farming, for example). Irrigation is greatly reduced or ceases during rainy periods but commonly resumes shortly thereafter. Most irrigation is done during the .latter part of the dry season, which extends from November through April or May, but with the approach of the rainy season (June through October), extended dry periods commonly occur and water use for crop irrigation may be considerable. The changes in land use affecting the pattern of irrigation in the county will probably continue in the future. Along the main north -south road in the county (U.S. Highway 1), and along the main east -west road (State Road 60), urban development is replacing groves, so irrigation water use there is decreasing. In other areas, such as near Fellsmere, large areas of citrus groves are being planted. Irrigation water use in these places will increase accordingly. On the Barrier Island, north of Vero Beach, land use is changing from citrus groves to mostly residential. Bermes (1958, p. 39) reported that 6.8 Mgal/d of irrigation water was withdrawn from about 90 wells in this area during 1951. If the current trend continues as predicted by county planners, most of the groves on the Barrier Island will probably be replaced with urban development in the next decade (1985-95), so irrigation water use will be minimal. Additional public -water supply systems using the reverse osmosis treatment will probably be installed. The amount of water used for public -water supplies will probably never exceed the amount that was previously used for irrigation. 379 84 Two types of irrigation systems are generally used in the county --flood and low volume (microjet); some overhead sprinkling is also done. In the flood system, water is applied by ditches or laterals that radiate from large open canals. In low-volume irrigation, water is typically distributed by pipeline and applied as a small jetspray to each tree in the grove. Flood irrigation, which currently uses mostly surface water, is still used by the majority of groves, but the low-volume system, which commonly uses ground water, is steadily increasing in use. The low-volume system is considered more efficient because evaporation is minimized during applica- tion. As the use of the low-volume system increases and replaces the flood - irrigation system, the use of ground water will increase and the use of surface water will decrease. However, ground -water use could possibly decline or remain about the same if large tracts of groves are converted to urban development. Data are currently (1985) not available on the amounts of water required for low-volume irrigation. In 1984, an estimated 78 percent of the water used for irrigation was surface water (105 Mgal/d) and 22 percent was ground water (30 Mgal/d). The amount of water withdrawn from the Floridan aquifer system and used for irrigation in the county is difficult to ascertain. An irrigation -use inventory that shows areal and seasonal distribution of discharge from the Floridan does not exist. Pride (1973) reported that total irrigation use (surface water and ground water) in 1970 was 132 Mgal/d. Prior to 1985, many estimates of water use for irrigation in the county were based on permitted use which did not consider seasonal rainfall and surface -water storage. For example, contribution of water from the Floridan aquifer system in 1970 was reported as 100 Mgal/d--up 50 Mgal/d from 1951 (Crain and others, 1975 p. 28). After considering the factors of seasonal rainfall and surface -water storage, Marella (1986, p. 70) reported total agricultural - irrigation use in 1985 as 135.61 Mgal/d. Ground -water and surface -water uses were reported as 28.43 Mgal/d and 107.18 Mgal/d, respectively. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS Indian River County has an area of 549 mit. Much of the drainage in the county has been drastically modified since the 1900's and is presently (1985) undergoing further change. Vast sections of the St. Johns Marsh that previously were part of the St. Johns River drainage area in the western half of the county have been diked and channeled for agricultural use. Most drainage is now eastward to the Indian River. In the eastern part of the county, residential and commercial developments are replacing citrus groves. The surficial aquifer system and the Floridan aquifer system are the sources of all ground water used in Indian River County. The two systems contain ground water that ranges in salinity from fresh to brine. High chloride concentration is the chief water -quality problem in the county. In eastern Indian River County, the surficial aquifer system consists of a 100- to 150 -foot -thick "clastic zone" (combined Holocene deposits and Fort Thompson and Anastasia Formations) and an underlying 0- to 60 -foot -thick "shallow rock zone" (Tamiami Formation). The thickness of the surficial aquifer system generally increases in a southerly direction, from about a 100 feet in the northern part of the county to about 200 feet south of State Road 60. 85 380 The Floridan aquifer system consists of about 2,800 feet of carbonate rocks, subdivided on the basis of permeability, into the Upper Floridan aquifer (about 350-650 feet thick), the middle semiconfining unit (about 20-120 feet thick), and the Lower Floridan aquifer (about 2,000 feet thick). The surficial and Floridan aquifer systems are separated by a low permeability rock unit known.as the intermediate confining unit. Transmissivities of the surficial aquifer system range from 1,500 to 11,000 ft2/d. Transmissivities tend to be lower in the shallow rock zone than in the clastic zone. At Vero Beach, where wells penetrate both zones, transmissivities range from 2,400 to 6,300 ft2/d. Specific capacities range from 21 to 70 (gal/min)/ft in eastern Indian River County, and range from 9 to 36 (gal/min)/ft in the Vero Beach well field. Yields of wells that tap both the clastic and the shallow rock zones in the Vero Beach well field are as much as 1,200 gal/min. The lowest well yields in the county (less than 10 gal/min) occur in marsh areas in the central part of the county. Water levels in the surficial aquifer system in eastern Indian River County may vary substantially from one location to another. Water levels generally fluctuate in response to seasonal changes in climate and pumping from wells but may also fluctuate in response to manipulation of flows in the drainage network in the county. Water levels in the Vero Beach well field during the May 1981 drought, were as low as 39 feet below sea level in wells that tap the surficial aquifer system; levels were lowest east and north of the airstrip. In May 1984, water levels had recovered substan- tially and were only 11 feet below sea level in some wells. However, water levels remained lowest near the airstrip. Yields of many wells in the Vero Beach well field decreased in 1981 owing to the large drawdowns in the surficial aquifer system caused by long- term, continuous pumping. The problem was alleviated by implementing a well field management program that involved alternating withdrawals between sets of wells spaced far enough apart so as to minimize interfering drawdowns. In addition, a few wells were deepened to penetrate the shallow rock zone, and several new wells were installed to replace abandoned wells. Pumpage in the Vero Beach well field approximately doubled during the 10 -year period 1975-85 and peaked to about 9.5 Mgal/d in the spring of 1981, during a major drought. Coinciding with the increase in pumpage, however, water levels in the surficial aquifer system declined in the vicinity of the Vero Beach well field. Water -level measurements made in the surficial aquifer system near the Vero Beach well field in April 1971 and May 1984 indicate that water levels generally declined about 15 to 19 feet. The surficial aquifer system in Indian River County is recharged mostly by infiltration of rainfall and by some periodic downward percolation of irrigation water. The aquifer receives little recharge from the underlying Floridan aquifer system because, though heads in the Floridan are generally higher than heads in the surficial aquifer system, a thick section of low permeability strata (the Hawthorn Formation) effectively separates the surficial and Floridan aquifer systems. Discharge from the surficial aquifer system is from seepage to the ocean, lakes, rivers, and canals; evapotranspiration; and withdrawals from wells. 86 381 Chloride concentrations in water from wells in the shallow rock zone in eastern Indian River County are generally below 100 mg/L except along Sebastian Creek and the Barrier Island where concentrations exceed 250 mg/L, and the east Vero Beach well field area where concentrations range from less than 100 to more than 1,000 mg/L. Water from observation wells east of the Vero Beach well field and approximately 1,000 feet west of the Indian River, have chloride concentrations greater than 20,000 mg/L. Chloride concentrations in water from wells in the clastic zone also increase in an easterly direction, but concentrations are not as high as those in water from the shallow rock zone wells along the Indian River. Chloride concentrations in the clastic zone are generally less than 250 mg/L west of the Indian River but exceed 250 mg/L on the Barrier Island. The high chloride concentration in some wells that tap the surficial aquifer system may be due to the intrusion of seawater or the intrusion of water from the Floridan aquifer system. Water from the Floridan aquifer system can be introduced into the surficial aquifer system by upward leakage around the casing of wells in the Floridan, corroded -through well casings, or by downward infiltration of irrigation water from the Floridan aquifer system. Excluding the area east of the Vero Beach well field, the greatest chloride concentrations in water from wells in the surficial aquifer system generally occur south of Main Canal. Concentrations are lowest in the area of the airstrip coincident with the area of maximum drawdown in the Vero Beach well field. Chloride concentrations have increased in a few wells in the well field but changes have been relatively small. Between 1976 and 1983, the average chloride concentration in six production wells increased about 36 mg/L. However, average concentrations in four other wells were unchanged. The increases in chloride concentrations occurred in wells scattered throughout the area and were probably related to the increase in well -field pumpage from 5.44 Mgal/d in 1976 to 8.00 Mgal/d in 1983. Assuming the surficial aquifer system receives 10 inches of natural recharge per year, about 67 Mgal/d of water is theoretically available for withdrawal in eastern Indian River County. This implies that sufficient water may be available for public -supply use in the foreseeable future in the county if development does not reduce the natural recharge rate and withdrawals are properly managed. In the eastern part of the county, high - yielding wells completed in the surficial aquifer system are most likely to be found along the Atlantic Coastal Ridge west of U.S. Highway 1. Problems relating to saltwater intrusion of the surficial aquifer system can be minimized if all new wells are tested for saltwater during installation and production, and if all unused wells in the Floridan aquifer system are plugged from bottom to top. The occurrence and extent of salt- water intrusion into the surficial aquifer can be assessed only if long-term water -quality -monitoring programs are maintained. About 65 percent of all ground water used in the county is from the Floridan aquifer system. The system, which is about 2,800 feet thick, in descending order, consists of the Upper Floridan aquifer, the middle semiconfining unit, and the Lower Floridan aquifer. The hydrology of the 87 382 Floridan aquifer system is complex, and considerable variation in yield and water quality may be found in nearby wells of equal depth. The permeability of the Upper Floridan aquifer generally is higher than the Lower Floridan aquifer. The most productive water -yielding zones are in the Avon Park Formation in the Upper Floridan aquifer. The Lower Floridan aquifer may also be productive in places. Wells more than 700 feet deep in the eastern part of the county are probably completed in the Lower Floridan aquifer. Transmissivities of the Floridan aquifer system as determined from individual aquifer tests range from about 10,000 ft2/d from a well in the Upper Floridan aquifer to 1.5 x 106 ft2/d from an injection well completed in the Boulder Zone in the Lower Floridan aquifer. However computer model simulations of the regional ground -water system, indicate that, generally, transmissivities are in the range of 65,000 to 200,000 ft2/d. Specific capacities of 37 wells that tap the Floridan aquifer system range from 1 (gal/min)/ft to 200 (gal/min)/ft), with a median of 67 (gal/min)/ft. Specific capacity data indicate lower than average specific capacities in western Indian River County, higher than average values in the central part, and probably low values east of a fault trace along the Indian River. Most wells completed in the Floridan aquifer system flow. Measured flow rates range from 30 to 2,000 gal/min with a median of 650 gal/min. A flow of 6,000 gal/min is reported from a well completed at a depth of 1,350 feet. Wells in the Floridan aquifer system are generally capable of yielding several hundred gallons of water'per minute. Inventoried irriga- tion wells range from 233 feet to 1,272 feet in depth --median depth is 700 feet. Average well depths have increased from about 650 feet in 1950 to about 900 feet in 1985 in response to a demand for higher well yields. Well casings generally extend only into the intermediate confining unit (Hawthorn Formation), which directly overlies the Floridan aquifer system. Many wells are uncased at depths below about 200 feet. Corroded -through steel well casings are a significant problem, and the use of plastic (polyvinyl- chloride) casing is bedoming common. More than 90 percent of inventoried wells in the Floridan aquifer system are used for irrigation. In those places where yields or water quality from wells in the surficial aquifer system is a problem, water from wells in the Floridan aquifer system has been successfully used for public water supply after reverse osmosis treatment. The public supply system at Vero Beach utilizes water from two wells in the Floridan aquifer system to supplement the yield from a well field that taps the surficial aquifer system. The regional ground -water movement in the Upper Floridan aquifer is east from the recharge area in eastern Polk and western Highlands County. Natural discharge is mostly upward leakage through the intermediate confining unit. The potentiometric surface of the Upper Floridan aquifer, when most stressed,in May, generally ranges from an altitude of about 30 feet along the coastline to about 50 feet on the Talbot terrace in the western part of the county. Potentiometric contours shift slightly eastward toward the Atlantic Ocean between May and September because of the recharge from summer (wet season) rains and curtailment of irrigation pumping. Water levels in September are generally 2 to 5 feet higher than levels in May, but if rainfall is deficient, levels in May can be as much as 15 feet lower than in September in heavily pumped areas. The rainfall deficit of about 19 inches during the 1980-81 drought caused record low water levels in many wells in May 1981. Water levels in wells in the Lower Floridan aquifer 88 383 probably stand several feet higher than wells in the Upper Floridan aquifer, so wells that penetrate both units have resultant combination heads of the producing zones penetrated. Long-term trends that may indicate declining water levels due to development are difficult to ascertain because variations in natural recharge may mask the trend. Water levels in the Floridan aquifer system in the generally undeveloped western part of the county declined 8 to 10 feet in the period between the 1930's and 1978, due to the effects of regional pumping. In the eastern part of the county, levels declined about 16 to 24 feet in the 50 -year period 1934 to 1984, but most of the declines occurred prior to 1976. In the future, water levels in the Floridan aquifer system may decline locally in those areas of the county where pumpage is increasing, such as in the Fellsmere area and in the area of the reverse osmosis treatment plant near Oslo. Curtailed water use in other parts of the county may allow water levels to rise, in areas such as the Indian River Water Control District where irrigation use is declining due to urban development. Water from the Floridan aquifer system is relatively highly mineralized and the predominant constituents are sodium and chloride. Salinity increases with depth and is a function of flushing out of the ancient seawater trapped in the sediments during an earlier geologic time. Water from the Floridan aquifer system commonly exceeds the Florida Department of Environmental Regulation maximum contaminant levels for public drinking water systems of 250 mg/L for chloride and 500 mg/L for dissolved -solids concentration. In places, corroded -through casings of wells in the Floridan aquifer system have allowed high chloride concentration water to intrude the surficial aquifer system. High heads, generally 10 to 30 feet above land surface, at present (1985) prevent saltwater contamination of the Floridan aquifer system from the Indian River or the Atlantic Ocean. The high heads also prevent surface pollution from moving downward into the aquifer. However, pollutants could be introduced into the Floridan aquifer system from recharge areas mostly outside the county, and heavy pumping can cause upconing of highly saline water. Periodic sampling of monitor wells would be needed to recognize incipient quality -of -water changes that could cause problems. Chloride concentrations may vary considerably both areally and vertically. Chloride concentrations in water from wells in the Floridan aquifer system that flow continuously have less yearly variation than concentrations from wells that are periodically allowed to flow. Water in the Upper Floridan aquifer is fresher and less variable in quality than water in the Lower Floridan aquifer. Concentrations generally increase slightly with depth in the Upper Floridan aquifer but may increase rapidly with depth in the Lower Floridan. Chloride concentrations in water from the Upper Floridan aquifer range from 20 to 1,400 mg/L. Concentrations less than 250 mg/L occur primarily in the western, southwestern, and central part of the county. 89 384 Chloride concentrations in water from wells that. yield mostly from the Lower Floridan aquifer range from 250 to 2,920 mg/L. In the eastern half of the county, concentrations generally exceed 500 mg/L. Water with chloride concentrations of 400 mg/L or less occurs in a narrow band along the trace of the Atlantic Coastal Ridge in the northern half of the county. Anoma- lously high chloride concentrations in water from some wells probably are a site-specific condition caused by heavy pumping from a relatively deep well. Average chloride concentrations of water in the Floridan aquifer system throughout the county have increased only about 6 percent in the 15 -year period 1968-83. However, chloride concentrations in water from 26 wells sampled during a 1951-52 study increased an average of about 20 percent between the early 1950's and 1985. Chloride concentrations in the Vero Beach area are apparently increasing; concentrations in water from well 93F increased from 300 mg/L in 1975 to 476 mg/L in 1985, and concentrations in well 94F increased from 285 mg/L in 1976 to 384 mg/L in 1985. At the old Vero Beach Power Plant, chloride concentrations in water from well 73F increased from 291 mg/L in 1921 to 790 mg/L in 1983. Large quantities of moderately mineralized irrigation water from wells in the Floridan aquifer system commonly mix with less mineralized surface water and water from the surficial aquifer system in the canals that are used to drain or irrigate cropland. The specific conductance of water in a typical canal, South Canal, during the water year 1984 ranged between 900 to 1,700 µS/cm (about 250-450 mg/L chloride, respectively). The highest conductance of 2,880 µS/cm (about 850 mg/L chloride) was in May 1984 when only 1.02 inches of rain fell, and the lowest conductance of 540 yS/cm (about 150 mg/L chloride) was in October 1983 which had a record high rainfall of 15.58 inches. About 8.5 Mgal/d of ground water is used for public supply in the county, mostly by Vero Beach. In June 1985, the county -owned reverse osmosis treatment plant near Oslo provided about 1 Mgal/d of public -supply water to its service area south and west of Vero Beach from two wells that tap the Floridan aquifer system. Another reverse osmosis plant at Wabasso Beach (North Beach Water Company) supplied about 0.06 Mgal/d of water from two wells in the Floridan aquifer system to services on the Barrier Island between January and May 1985. The largest use of ground water in the county is for irrigation. An additional 8 Mgal/d of ground water is used for domestic supply. Industrial and thermoelectric use of ground water is minimal. In 1984, an estimated 22 percent of the water used for irrigation in the county was ground water (30 Mgal/d). About 35 percent of the total area of Indian River County is in agri- cultural use, of which about 75 percent is irrigated with large quantities of water from wells that tap the Floridan aquifer system. Most agricultural land use is citrus groves --some is in pasture and truck farming. Changes in land use are affecting the pattern of irrigation. Urban development is replacing groves along sections of U.S. Highway 1 and State Road 60, so there irrigation water use is decreasing. In other areas, such as near Fellsmere, large areas of citrus groves are being developed--irrigation- water use will probably increase, accordingly. On the Barrier Island, 90 385 land use is changing from citrus groves to residential. Most of the groves on the Barrier Island may be replaced by urban development by 1995. At that time, water use there will probably be mostly for public supply and the amount of water used for that purpose is not likely to equal or exceed the amount that has been used for irrigation in the past. SELECTED REFERENCES Barraclough, J.T., 1962, Ground -water resources of Seminole County, Florida: Florida Geological Survey Report of Investigations 27, 91 p. Bermes, B. J., 1958, Interim report on geology and ground -water resources of Indian River County, Florida: Florida Geological Survey Information Circular 18, 74 p. Brown, M.P., and Reece, D.E., 1979, Hydrogeologic reconnaissance of the Floridan aquifer system Upper East Coast Planning Area: West Palm Beach, South Florida Water Management District Technical Map Series 79-1, plates 1-10B. Brown, R.H., 1963, Drawdowns resulting from cyclic intervals of discharge, in Bentall, Ray, compiler, Methods of determining permeability, trans- missibility, and drawdown: U.S. Geological Survey Water Supply Paper 1536-I, p. 324-330. Burns, W.S., 1983, Well plugging applications to the inter -aquifer migration of saline groundwater in Lee County, Florida: West Palm Beach, South Florida Water Management District Technical Publication 83-8, 77 p., appendix I -III. Campbell, Dean, Munch, D.A., Johnson, Richard, Parker, M.P., Parker, Bruce, Rao, D.V., Marella, Richard, and Albanesi, Edward, 1984, Section III Water administration and regional management, Chapter 13, St. Johns River Water Management District, in Fernald, E.A., and Patton, D.J., eds., Water Resources Atlas of Florida, Tallahassee, Florida State University, p. 158-177. CH2M Hill, 1979, Injection test well and multizone monitor well Indian River Plant: Hydrogeologic Report, project no. GN 54801.80; consultant's report prepared for Hercules Inc., in files of U.S. Geological Survey, Orlando, Fla., 6 chapters, appendix A -K. Cooke, C.W., 1939, Scenery of Florida: Florida Geological Survey Bulletin 17, 118 p. ----- 1945, Geology of Florida: Florida Geological Survey Bulletin 29, 339 p. Crain, L.J., Hughes, G.H., and Snell, L.J., 1975, Water resources of Indian River County, Florida: Florida Bureau of Geology Report of Investiga- tions 80, 75 p. Florida Department of Environmental Regulation, 1982, Public drinking water systems: Chapter 17-22 in Florida Administrative Code. Florida Department of Natural Resources, 1970, Florida water and related land resources -St. Johns River basin: Tallahassee, Fla., 205 p. Florida Department of State, 1978, Rules of the Department of Environmental Regulation, Water -Quality Standards, Chapter 17-3, in Florida Admini- strative Code: Tallahassee, Fla. Frazee, J.M., and Johnson, R.A., 1983, The hydrology of the post Hawthorn shallow rock zone of Brevard and Indian River Counties: Paper presented at the Southeastern Section of the Geological Society of America, Tallahassee, Fla. 91 386 SELECTED REFERENCES --Continued Gee and Jenson, 1980, Future water supply development for the City of Vero Beach, Florida: Consultant's report prepared for City of Vero Beach, in files of St. Johns River Water Management District, Palatka, Fla., 167 p. Geraghty and Miller, Inc., 1978, Availability of ground water at Hobart Park, Indian River County, Florida: Consultant's report prepared for Indian River County Commissioners, in files of St. Johns River Water Management District, Palatka, Fla., 40 p. ----- 1981a, Drilling and testing for public water supply from the shallow aquifer, Sebastian Highlands, Indian River County, Florida: Consult- ant's report prepared for General Development Corp., Miami, Fla., in files of St. Johns River Water Management District, Palatka, Fla., 45 p. ----- 1981b, Installation and testing of production and monitoring wells, South Taxing District, Indian River County, Florida: Consultant's report prepared for Indian River County Commissioners, in files of St. Johns River Water Management District, Palatka, Fla., 138 p. Johnston, R.H., Krause, R.E., Meyer, R.W., Ryder, P.D., Tibbals, C.H., and Hunn, J.D., 1980, Estimated potentiometric surface for the Tertiary limestone aquifer system, southeastern United States, prior to development: U.S. Geological Survey Open -File Report 80-406, scale 1:1,000,000, 1 sheet. Kohout, F.A., 1965, A hypothesis concerning cyclic flow of salt water related to geothermal heating in the Floridan aquifer: Transactions of the New York Academy of Sciences, ser. II, 28, no. 2, p. 249-271. Krieger, R.A., Hatchett, J.L., and Poole, J.L., 1957, Preliminary survey of the saline -water resources of the United States: U.S. Geological Survey Water -Supply Paper 1374, 172 p. Lloyd, J.M., 1985, Annotated bibliography of Florida basement geology and related regional and tectonic studies including an appendix of Florida deep well data: Florida Bureau of Geology Information Circular 98, 72 p. MacNeil, F.S., 1949, Pleistocene shorelines in Florida and Georgia: U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 221-F, p. 91-107. Marella, Richard, 1986, Annual water use survey: 1985: Palatka, Fla., St. Johns River Water Management District Technical Publication SJ86-5, 117 p. McKee, J.E., and Wolf, H.W., 1963, Water quality criteria (2d ed.): California State Water Quality Control Board Publication 3-A, 548 p. Miller, J.A., 1982, Thickness of the upper permeable zone of the Tertiary limestone aquifer system, southeastern United States: U.S. Geological Survey Water -Resources Investigations Open -File Report 81-1179, scale 1:1,000,000, 1 sheet. ----- 1986, Hydrogeologic framework of the Floridan aquifer system in Florida and parts of Georgia, Alabama, and South Carolina: U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 1403-B, 91 p. National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration, Climatological data, Florida, annual summaries. Parker, G. G., Ferguson, G.E., Love, S.K., and others, 1955, Water resources of southeastern Florida: U.S. Geological Survey Water -Supply Paper 1255, 965 p. Phelps, G.G., 1984, Recharge and discharge areas of the Floridan aquifer in the St. Johns River Water Management District and vicinity, Florida: U.S. Geological Survey Water -Resources Investigations 82-4058, 1 sheet. 92 387 SELECTED REFERENCES --Continued Planert, Michael, and Aucott, W.R., 1985, Water -supply potential of the Floridan aquifer in Osceola, eastern Orange, and southwestern Brevard Counties, Florida: U.S. Geological Survey Water -Resources Investigations Report 84-4135, 69 p. Pride, R.W., 1973, Estimated use of water in Florida, 1970: Florida Bureau of Geology Information Circular 83, 31 p. Seaburn and Robertson, Inc., 1983a, The North Beach Water Company reverse osmosis supply well no. 2 construction and aquifer testing report: Consultant's report prepared for the North Beach Water Co., Vero Beach, Fla., in files of St. Johns River Water Management District, Palatka, Fla., 34 p. ----- 1983b, Marsh Island reverse osmosis supply well completion report: Consultant's report prepared for Florida Communities of Vero Beach, in files of U.S. Geological Survey, Orlando, Fla., 31 p. Sprinkle, C.L., 1982, Chloride concentration in water from the upper permeable zone of the Tertiary limestone aquifer system, southeastern United States: U.S. Geological Survey Water -Resources Investigations Open -File Report 81-1103, scale 1:1,000,000, 1 sheet. Stringfield, V.T., 1936, Artesian water in the Florida peninsula: U.S. Geological Survey Water -Supply Paper 773-C, p. 115-195. ----- 1966, Artesian water in Tertiary limestone in the southeastern states: U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 517, 226 p. Tibbals, C.H., 1978, Effects of paved surfaces on recharge to the Floridan aquifer in east -central Florida --a conceptual model: U.S. Geological Survey Water -Resources Investigations 78-76, 42 p. ----- 1981, Computer simulation of the steady-state flow system of the Tertiary limestone (Floridan) aquifer system in east -central Florida: U.S. Geological Survey Water -Resources Investigations Open -File Report 81-681, 31 p. ----- in press, Hydrology of the Floridan aquifer system in east -central Florida: U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 1403-E. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 1976, Quality criteria for water: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency report EPA -44019-76-023, 501 p. University of Florida, 1986, Florida estimates of population, April 1, 1985, states, counties and municipalities: Gainesville, University of Florida Bureau of Economic and Business Research, Population Program, 48 p. White, W.A., 1970, The geomorphology of the Florida peninsula: Florida Bureau of Geology Bulletin 51, 164 p. 93 388 SUPPLEMENTARY DATA I Wells in the surficial aquifer system used for data analysis [Altitude refers to distance above sea level] 6S 273457 0802336 Randy Saxton -- Altitude 2 7S Well Lati- Longi- -- 70 -- of land Well Casing No. tude tude -- -- Well name surface depth Depth Diameter Holiday Village -- 65 -- 4 10S (feet) (feet) (feet) (inches) 1S 273348 0801930 SJRWMD 9.88 147 108 4 2S 273356 0802232 Vero Beach Highlands 42 127 -- -- 3S 273356 0802237 Vero Beach Highlands 37 127 -- -- 4S 273418 0802909 I.R. Correctional Inst. 25 65 -- -- 5S 273448 0802658 USGS -- 20 62 -- -- 6S 273457 0802336 Randy Saxton -- -- -- 2 7S 273459 0802254 Morgan Thomas -- 70 -- 2 8S 273459 0802307 Shirley McDougald -- -- -- 1.25 9S 273505 0802458 Holiday Village -- 65 -- 4 10S 273508 0802419 James Whalen -- -- -- 2 11S 273508 0802523 John Metherall -- 80 -- 2 12S 273509 0802257 Father & Son Appl. -- 65 -- 2 13S 273509 0802258 Father & Son Appl. 37 45 -- -- 14S 273511 0802448 John Streeter -- -- -- -- 15S 273512 0802625 Barbara Nolte -- 73 -- 2 16S 273513 0802223 Entomological Inst. -- -- -- 2 17S 273513 0802240 Undetermined 10 90 -- -- 18S 273513 0802851 Ocean Spray Industries 26 63 -- -- 19S 273514 0802240 Undetermined 10 90 -- -- 20S 273515 0802505 Oaks Paradise MHP 21 87 -- -- 21S 273518 0801959 Smith 13 14 11 2 22S 273518 0802731 Hyatt Fruit Co. 21 65 -- -- 23S 273518 0802731 USGS 21 120 -- -- 24S 273523 0802346 Earl McGiff -- 98 -- 2 25S 273539 0802246 Vista Royale 11 100 -- -- 26S 273543 0802247 Vista Royale 9 100 -- -- 27S 273556 0802250 Vista Royale 11 91 -- -- 28S 273558 0802303 Knights of Columbus -- -- -- 2 29S 273603 0802250 Vista Royale 9 91 -- -- 30S 273604 0802449 Undetermined 23 100 -- -- 31S 273607 0802328 SJRWMD 22.37 143 101 4 32S 273607 0802328 SJRWMD -- 53 43 2 33S 273608 0802252 Vista Royale 11 92 -- -- 34S 273629 0802328 F.H. Buffington 24 86 -- -- 35S 273713 0802422 H.E. Chappel 22 80 -- -- 94 389 1 Wells -in -the surficial aquifer system used for data analysis --Continued Well No. Lati- tude Longi- tude Well name Altitude of land surface (feet) Well depth (feet) Casiniz Depth Diameter (feet) (inches) 36S 273713 0802422 H.E. Chappell 22 33 -- -- 37S 273731 0802122 S. Valentino 4 20 -- -- 38S 273732 0802410 SJRWMD 19.37 55 45 2 39S 273732 0802410 SJRWMD 21.27 123 108 4 40S 273734 0802329 Mid -Fla Utilities 13 93 -- -- 41S 273736 0802327 Mid -Fla Utilities 12 100 -- -- 42S 273737 0802330 Mid -Fla Utilities 13 93 -- -- 43S 273737 0802342 City of Vero Beach -- 130 50 2 44S 273739 0802525 City of Vero Beach -- 131 50 2 45S 273741 0802320 Vero Palms Motel 11 67 -- -- 46S 273741 0802412 City of Vero Beach 17.80 120 55 12 47S 273743 0802131 C. Smith 3 8 -- -- 48S 273745 0802346 City of Vero Beach 14.40 117 55 12 49S 273756 0802248 City of Vero Beach 4.90 100 10 2 50S 273756 0802301 Bertha Boettcher -- 50 -- -- 51S 273756 0802314 City of Vero Beach 6.70 125 10 2 52S 273756 0802413 City of Vero Beach 20.30 140 55 12 53S 273757 0802345 City of Vero Beach 13.70 140 10 2 54S 273759 0802301 Marcell St. Thomas -- 65 -- 1.5 55S 273759 0802827 L. Laney -- -- -- 1.5 56S 273801 0802301 Melvin J. Scheidt -- 33 30 1.25 57S 273807 0802533 John D. Grice -- 45 40 2 58S 273808 0802305 City of Vero Beach 5.10 100 10 2 59S 273808 0802420 Bernice Meyer -- 60 -- 1.25 60S 273809 0802303 Anthony Mirabito -- 40 -- 2 61S 273811 0802306 B. Pfleiderer -- 42 -- 1.25 62S 273811 0802524 C.J. Neilsen -- 60 -- 2 63S 273811 0802824 C. Schmaltz -- 25 -- 1.5 64S 273812 0802727 Fran Price -- 20 -- 1.25 65S 273812 0802901 Dave Gagliardi -- 85 -- 1.5 66S 273813 0802454 D.K. Richardson -- 60 -- 2 67S 273814 0802314 Earl Mathiak -- 44 40 2 68S 273814 0802415 A.R. Jones -- 90 -- 3 69S 273814 0802526 Elmer Grant -- 68 63 2 70S 273814 0802745 Bertram Bach -- 29 -- 2 390 95 Wells in the surficial aquifer system used for data analysis --Continued Well No. Lati- tude Longi- tude Well name Altitude of land surface (feet) Well depth (feet) Casing Depth Diameter (feet) (inches) 71S 273814 0802824 Major Surles -- 45 -- 1.5 72S 273814 0802828 C.H. Murtaugh -- 47 -- -- 73S 273815 0802418 Edith MacLean -- 70 -- 2 74S 273817 0802828 Wm. L. Shelton -- 47 -- 1.5 75S 273818 0802434 John Detrick -- 60 -- 3 76S 273818 0802503 John Stone -- 50 -- 2 77S 273818 0802724 E.A. Hobbs -- 600 -- 3 78S 273818 0802826 L. Layman -- 40 -- 1.5 79S 273819 0802429 Jerry VanKeulen -- 87 -- 2 80S 273819 0802545 City of Vero Beach 24 130 65 2 81S 273821 0802413 1st United Methodist -- 60 -- 3 82S 273821 0802628 Haller LaRue -- 15 -- 1.25 83S 273821 0802708 Charles Reschakh -- 60 -- 1.25 84S 273822 0802420 City of Vero Beach 19.30 130 40 2 85S 273822 0802503 Mrs. David Evans -- 60 -- -- 86S 273822 0802623 A.J. Brackins -- 60 -- 2 87S 273822 0802632 Philip Junkins -- 60 -- -- 88S 273823 0802618 C. Stecher -- 80 -- 2 89S 273823 0802631 Kathy Beatty -- 60 -- 1.25 90S 273823 0803115 USGS 25 120 -- -- 91S 273824 0802729 M.J. Long -- 60 -- 1.25 92S 273829 0802355 City of Vero Beach 14.60 141 50 2 93S 273833 0802437 City of Vero Beach 20 135 65 20 94S 273833 0802437 USGS -- 90 -- -- 95S 273833 0802437 City of Vero Beach 21.90 135 65 2 96S 273833 0802437 City of Vero Beach 22.90 135 65 2 97S 273833 0802437 City of Vero Beach 21.90 135 65 2 98S 273833. 0802437 City of Vero Beach 22.30 102 77 2 99S '273833 0802437 City of Vero Beach 23.00 53 5 2 1005 273838 0802450 City of Vero Beach 30.60 103 -- -- 101S 273842 0802447 USGS 21 55 -- -- 102S 273844 0802426 City of Vero Beach 20 105 65 20 1035 273844 0802426 City of Vero Beach 19.20 105 65 2 104S 273844 0802426 City of Vero Beach 19.40 105 65 2 1055 273844 0802426 City of Vero Beach 20.20 105 65 2 391 96 Wells in the surficial aquifer system used for data analysis --Continued 111S 273846 0802609 City of Vero Beach Altitude 130 75 2 Well Lati- Longi- City of Vero Beach of land Well Casing No. tude tude Well name USGS surface depth Depth Diameter 48 -- -- 114S 273856 0802527 City (feet) (feet) (feet) (inches) 1065 273844 0802426 City of Vero Beach 20 90 77 4 107S 273844 0802426 City of Vero Beach 20.20 50 5 2 1085 273844 0802520 City of Vero Beach 22 93 53 10 109S 273844 0802544 City of Vero Beach 21 90 52 10 110S 273844 0802544 City of Vero Beach 21 127 60 12 111S 273846 0802609 City of Vero Beach -- 130 75 2 112S 273847 0802438 City of Vero Beach 22 80 -- -- 113S 273853 0802410 USGS 15 48 -- -- 114S 273856 0802527 City of Vero Beach 25.30 130 55 12 1155 273858 0802330 USGS 6 54 -- - 116S 273900 0802547 City of Vero Beach 22 130 60 12 117S 273903 0802548 USGS 22 61 -- -- 118S 273905 0802409 City of Vero Beach 21 112 60 12 119S 273907 0802305, City of Vero Beach 5 92 -- 2 120S 273907 0802305 USGS 4 120 -- -- 121S 273907 0802419 City of Vero Beach 20.75 112 60 12 122S 273907 0802422 USGS 20 58 -- -- 123S 273907 0802422 USGS 20 120 -- -- 124S 273907 0802440 City of Vero Beach 21 130 60 12 125S 273908 0802352 City of Vero Beach 9.10 116, 18 2 1265 273910 0802335 City of Vero Beach 7.30 120 10 2 127S 273910 0802442 City of Vero Beach 21 130 63 12 128S 273913 0802420 City of Vero Beach 17 81 49 10 129S 273919 0802549 City of Vero Beach 23.90 125 55 12 130S 273920 0802549 USGS 20 120 -- -- 131S 273921 0802416 City of Vero Beach 15 84 50 10 132S 273921 0802632 City of Vero Beach 26 81 -- 2 133S 273923 0802612 City of Vero Beach 22.70 140 60 12 1345 273923 0804718 USGS 32.21 19 13 6 135S 273925 0802609 City of Vero Beach 23 -- -- -- 1365 273929 0802630 City of Vero Beach 21.40 130 50 12 137S 273930 0802553 City of Vero Beach 23.40 96 -- -- 138S 273932 0802419 City of Vero Beach 20 112 60 12 139S 273935 0802321 City of Vero Beach 2.40 135 10 2 140S 273935 0802336 City of Vero Beach 7.70 140 10 2 97 392 Wells in the surficial aquifer system used for data analysis --Continued 98 393 Altitude Well Lati- Longi- of land Well Casing No. tude tude Well name surface depth Depth Diameter (feet) (feet) (feet) (inches) 141S 273935 0802353 City of Vero Beach 10 140 10 2 1425 273937 0802335 USGS 8 66 63 2 143S 273938 '0802514 City of Vero Beach 21 122 60 12 144S 273938 0802631 City of Vero Beach -- 136 75 2 1455 273938 0802632 City of Vero Beach 21.70 136 75 2 146S 273939 0802452 City of Vero Beach 21 100 60 12 147S 273940 0802508 City of Vero Beach 21 125 62 12 1485 273940 0804750 USGS 32.21 19 13 6 1495 273941 0802506 City of Vero Beach 22 92 -- -- 150S 273941 0802540 City of Vero Beach 22.70 135 55 12 151S 273942 0802427 City of Vero Beach 22.08 105 -- 6 152S 273942 0802542 USGS 22 58 55 2 153S 273951 0802430 City of Vero Beach 14.70 100 77 4 154S 273955 0802455 City of Vero Beach 20 127 60 12 155S 274000 0802437 City of Vero Beach 21 102 62 10 156S 274000 080245-9 City of Vero Beach 20.50 127 60 12 157S 274000 0802514 City of Vero Beach 21.70 120 43 10 158S 274001 0802349 USGS 6 66 -- -- 159S 274002 0802519 City of Vero Beach 22.60 95 -- -- 160S 274002 0802554 City of Vero Beach 25.30 91 -- -- 161S 274002 0802619 SJRWMD 25.74 53 43 2 162S 274002 0802619 SJRWMD -- 150 84 4 163S 274004 0802827 USGS 19 92 -- -- 1645 274007 0802640 USGS 22 87 -- -- 165S 274025 0802437 Quality Fruit Packers -- 80 -- 2 1665 274055 0802505 USGS 20 54 -- -- 1675 274240 0802532 SJRWMD 24.56 53 43 2 1685 274240 0802532 SJRWMD 24.39 144 95 4 169S 274301 0802605 Freta Brumley -- 80 -- 2 1705 274302 0802548 Brenda Tucker -- 169 -- 3 171S 274307 0802450 George Hamilton -- 45 -- 2 172S 274307 0802542 Dennis Proctor -- 90 -- -- 173S 274307 0802607 Gerald Gravenmier -- 45 -- 3 174S 274312 0802633 Hobart Park -- 70 -- -- 1755 274352 0802258 USGS 10 5 -- -- 98 393 Wells in the surficial aquifer system used for data analysis --Continued Well No. Lati- tude Longi- tude Well name Altitude of land surface (feet) Well depth (feet) Casing Depth Diameter (feet) (inches) 176S 274400 0802633 USGS 20 68 -- -- 177S 274414 0802650 SJRWMD 23.61 41 31 2 178S 274414 0802650 SJRWMD 24.49 137 88 4 1795 274422 0803828 USGS 23 67 -- -- 180S 274448 0802618 Graves Bros. Co. 20 888 -- -- 1815 274448 0803146 Stanley Frontzek -- 66 -- 2 1825 274451 0802639 Lost Tree Village 27.53 85 -- 2 1835 274453 0802638 Lost Tree Village 37 90 50 18 184S 274453 0802752 N.B. Ryall -- 60 -- 1.25 185S 274454 0802636 David Eldell -- 60 -- 2 1865 274454 0802643 Minnie Collins -- 60 -- 2 1875 274454 0802711 Florance Johnson -- 60 -- 2 188S 274454 0802756 Annabelle E. Smith -- -- -- 4 1895 274454 0802822 Mrs. Minnie Jones -- -- -- -- 190S 274454 0802957 Burrell Lynn -- 95 80 1.25 1915 274455 0802639 Queen Johnson -- 60 -- 2 192S 274455 0802640 Lost Tree Village 33 85 45 4 193S 274455 0802646 Lost Tree Village 26.40 85 -- 2 194S 274456 0802711 Rosebud Jones -- -- -- 2 195S 274457 0802637 Lost Tree Village 46.83 85 -- 2 1965 274457 0802751 Philip Newton -- 90 -- 2 197S 274457 0802752 H. Wilson -- 90 -- 1.5 198S 274458 0802630 Lost Tree Village 21.01 85 -- 2 199S 274458 0802640 Lost Tree Village 34 104 50 18 2005 274458 0802647 Thomas Ealy -- 62 -- 2 201S 274459 0802606 R.W. Aughtman -- -- -- 1.5 202S 274502 0802627 Lost Tree Village 20.03 85 -- 2 2035 274503 0802631 George Sessions -- 87 -- 2 204S 274505 0802603 Harry N. Mills -- 24 24 1.25 205S 274506 0802601 John Resanka -- 40 -- 1.5 206S 274506 0802603 Steve Dyalk -- 42 -- 1.5 207S 274506 0802603 Harry N. Mills -- 75 -- 1.5 208S 274507 0803123 William R. Gammill -- 80 -- 2 209S 274507 0803202 Joel McDaniel -- 77 -- 2 210S 274508 0802644 Lost Tree Village 34.86 85 -- 2 99 394 Wells in the surficial aquifer system used for data analysis --Continued 216S 274517 0802618 SJRWMD Altitude 49 39 Well Lati- Longi- 0802618 of land Well Casing No. tude tude Well name surface depth Depth Diameter 72 67 2 219S (feet) (feet) (feet) (inches) 211S 274508 0803144 Francis Betz -- 45 -- 2 212S 274509 0803048 Edward Brown -- 65 -- 2 2135 274511 0803109 Sharon Moon -- 80 -- 2 2145 274511 0803211 David Finch -- -- -- 2 215S 274515 0802537 USGS 2 53 -- -- 216S 274517 0802618 SJRWMD 11.95 49 39 2 217S 274517 0802618 SJRWMD 13.89 133 85 4 2185 274518 0802618 Tropical Travel Tr. Pk. 11.80 72 67 2 219S 274525 0802559 Olga C. Williams -- 135 -- 2 220S 274533 0802616 Lowe -- 70 -- 2 221S 274535 0803154 USGS 21 67 -- -- 222S 274538 0802833 Undetermined -- 75 -- -- 223S 274142 0802607 Joe Tomberg -- 70 -- 2 224S 274542 0802841 Undetermined -- 72 -- -- 225S 274547 0802352 John Escobedo -- 600 -- 2 226S 274548 0802808 Sebastian Highlands 23.34 102 65 18 227S 274548 0803037 Undetermined -- 87 -- -- 228S 274549 0802350 William Carnill -- -- -- 2 229S 274549 0802355 William Hickey -- 15 -- 2 230S 274552 0803505 W.L. Austin -- 60 -- 1.5 231S 274552 0803511 Frank McManus 232S 274554 0802808 Sebastian Highlands 23.65 102 65 18 233S 274557 0802359 Larry Lang -- 14 -- 2.5 234S 274601 .0803258 Stuckey's Rest. I-95 -- -- -- 4 2355 274602 0802823 Undetermined -- 75 -- -- 236S 274602 0803054 Harry Givens -- 65 -- 2 237S 274603 0802411 Richard Gillespie -- 18 -- 2 2385 274603 0802415 Peter Gasperini -- 20 -- 2 239S 274603 0803457 SJRWMD 30.75 140 105 4 2405 274603 0803457 SJRWMD -- 45 20 2 241S 274604 0802829 Undetermined -- 65 -- -- 2425 274604 0802831 Undetermined -- 40 -- -- 243S 274607 0802415 Gerald Horan -- -- -- 244S 274615 0802710 R. Anderson -- 25 26 1.5 2455 274616 0802703 Nolan Askins -- 22 20 1.5 100 395 Wells in the surficial aquifer system used for data analysis --Continued 251S 274650 0802951 P.E., Lemmon -- 128 Altitude 252S 274650 0804402 Well Lati- Longi- 2535 274658 of land Well Casing No. tude tude 0802718 Well name surface depth Depth Diameter 0802925 R. Hammond -- -- -- 2 256S (feet) (feet) (feet) (inches) 2465 274617 0802707 Johns Piliponis -- 21 17 1.5 2475 274618 0802710 John C. Villarose -- 44 42 1.5 248S 274619 0802641 R.C. Wilborn -- 75 -- 1.2 2495 274636 0803001 Noel Donais -- 115 -- 1.5 250S 274650 0802951 P.E. Lemmon -- 68 -- 2 251S 274650 0802951 P.E., Lemmon -- 128 105 2 252S 274650 0804402 Undetermined -- -- -- -- 2535 274658 0802933 H.J. Munson -- 60 -- 2 254S 274706 0802718 Cooley -- 50 -- 1.25 255S 274706 0802925 R. Hammond -- -- -- 2 256S 274708 0802704 Sam Baugh -- 115 -- 1.2 2575 274709 0802708 J.C. Kopeck -- 64 -- 1.2 2585 274709 0802708 J.C. Kopeck -- 400 -- 2.5 2595 274709 0802711 J.C. Kopeck -- 64 -- 1.2 2605 274709 0802740 Max Bressler -- 70 -- 2 261S 274709 0802743 Arthur Pederquist -- 120 -- 2 262S 274710 0802936 Ray Nudo -- 110 -- 1.25 263S 274711 0802658 A. Stuprich -- 78 -- 1.5 264S 274711 0802713 Harrel Riddle -- 45 -- 2 265S 274711 0802737 John Thompson -- 72 50 2 266S 274711 0802747 Henry Cwik -- 65 -- 2 267S 274712 0802502 D'Albora 9 40 -- 1.5 268S 274713 0802701 William Dalrymple -- 80 -- 1.5 269S 274714 0802739 James Forward -- 80 -- 2 270S 274716 0802705 Bill Schardt -- 90 -- 1.5 2715 274716 0802725 B. Parker -- -- -- 2 272S 274716 0802743 Norris Cox -- 85 -- 2 2735 274717 0802739 W.H. Phelan -- 90 -- 2 274S 274717 0802740 Arthur Hughes -- 85 -- 2 2755 274717 0802832 Sue Guynel -- 90 -- 2 276S 274719 0802704 G. Roarty -- 90 -. 1.5 277S 274725 0802918 Tracy Faulkner -- 135 -- 2 278S 274731 0802955 Carl Mullen -- 80 279S 274733 0802913 M. Dunn -- 110 -- 2 280S 274735 0802832 L.R. White -- 74 -- 1.25 396 101 Wells in the surficial aquifer system used for data analysis --Continued Well No. Lati- tude Longi- tude Well name Altitude of land surface (feet) Well depth (feet) Casing Depth Diameter (feet) (inches) 281S 274735 0802833 Pearl White -- 74 -- 1.25 282S 274735 0802835 Fredrick Trexler -- -- -- 1.25 2835 274736 0802848 John Walker -- -- -- 1.25 2345 274736 0802853 Paul Crichton -- -- -- -- 285S 274747 0804434 USGS 16 35 -- -- 2865 274750 0802733 John Timinsky -- 82 -- 2 287S 274758 0802736 Kroegel -- 520 -- 4 288S 274759 0802830 Victor Pelletier -- -- -- 1.25 289S 274809 0803007 Thomas J. Pepi -- 90 -- 1 290S 274823 0802747 Helen Tennyson -- 53 -- 1.5 2915 274823 0802747 Helen Tenyson -- 53 -- 1.5 292S 274827 0802811 Oscar R. Pedigo -- 65 -- 2 293S 274830 0802812 Golem -- 90 84 2 294S 274835 0804435 USGS 12 32 -- -- 295S 274840 0802811 Ethal Kinsell -- -- -- 2 296S 274841 0803018 J. Clinton Scott -- 80 -- 1.25 297S 274843 0802814 Berti Conner -- 65 -- 2 298S 274843 0802818 Carl Lazzeri -- -- -- -- 299S 274844 0802814 Sylvia Flood -- -- -- 4 300S 274906 0802810 Mrs. Helen Boone -- 100 97 2 301S 274908 0803019 Lester Vander Meer -- 115 100 1.25 302S 274917 0803021 Charles W. Calkins -- 115 100 1.25 303S 274918 0802816 Amos J. Simons -- -- -- 2 304S 274918 0803018 Ray Pospisil -- 85 -- 2 3055 274922 0803018 Robert Tanksley -- 87 -- 2 306S 274925 0802825 William Wihstutz -- 40 -- 2 307S 274925 0802825 William Wihstutz -- 40 -- 2 308S 274927 0802824 R.G. Bergbom -- -- -- 2 309S 274932 0802828 Swan -- -- -- 2 3105 274937 0803006 Henry Mesec -- 126 -- 1.25 3115 274942 0802835 Blizman -- 67 62 2 312S 274946 0802842 John Crumrine -- 90 -- 2 3135 274946 0802843 Charles Rhodes -- 400 -- 1.5 314S 274946 0802843 Charles Rhodes -- 90 -- 2 315S 274947 0802844 David Burns -- 85 -- 2 397 102 Wells in the surficial aquifer system used for data analysis --Continued Altitude Well Lati- Longi- of land Well Casing_ No. tude tude Well name surface depth Depth -Diameter (feet) (feet) (feet) (inches) 316S 274948 0802916 SJRWMD 20.60 134 105 4 317S 274948 0802916 SJRWMD 20.68 35 25 2 318S 274949 0802846 Tim Brussel -- 120 -- 2 319S 274951 0802843 Irvin Foss -- 86 -- 2 320S 274951 0802950 Christena Garry -- 65 -- 2 321S 274952 0802845 John Radzinsky -- 85 -- 2 322S 274953 0802953 A.G. Fletcher -- 87 -- 1.25 323S 274954 0802843 Bruce Robert -- 85 -- -- 324S 274955 0802848 Ernest Sherwin -- 94 -- 2 325S 274955 0802848 Ernest Sherwin -- 74 -- 2 326S 274958 0802845 Ruth R. Miller -- -- -- -- 327S 274958 0802850 Mary Bolton -- 127 -- -- 328S 274959 0802848 Nino Bertini -- 125 -- 2 3295 275002 0802935 Daniel Baker -- 80 -- 3 330S 275003 0802936 C.W. King -- 82 -- 2 331S 275010 0802858 Joseph Lutz -- 123 -- 2 332S 275011 0802856 Thor Tobiason -- 85 - -- 333S 275026 0802911 Vergie Herbert -- 80 -- 2 334S 275031 0802901 W.C. Tebay -- 60 -- 2 335S 275052 0802911 Phillip Garcia -- 65 -- 2 336S 275052 0802928 R.L. Brown -- 60 -- 2 337S 275056 0802916 Allen Anderson -- -- -- 1.2 338S 275059 0802926 S.D. Mason -- -- -= 2 398 103 SUPPLEMENTARY DATA II Wells in the Floridan aquifer system used for data analysis [Altitude refers to distance above sea level] 6F 273332080245001 Paramont Aquarium 27th Ave. Altitude Depth Well Site Edwin Prange 66th Ave. of land of No. identification Well name surface well 9F No. Evans Coves 14AE (feet) (feet) 1F 273212080351101 SLF-Green Ranch 20 946 2F 273238080421401 OKF-2 Evans Groves 28.07 686 3F 273304080255101 StL 44 McDonald 20 691 4F 273323080214201 StL 48 Dolenick 2 714 5F 273331080412701 Evans Groves 158W 27 960 6F 273332080245001 Paramont Aquarium 27th Ave. 22 1,000 7F 273335080280901 Edwin Prange 66th Ave. 23 940 8F 273336080403001 Evans Groves 15AE 27 900 9F 273342080403001 Evans Coves 14AE 27 900 1OF 273355080355601 Brady Groves West of Oslo 24 -- 11F 273357080220201 Midway MHP South of Oslo 5.36 -- 12F 273357080274901 Vernon Fromarg 66th Ave. 23 900 13F 273401080384101 Evans Groves 11DE 23 -- 14F 273402080332001 Morrison Groves 3 JIMROD 7 25 992 15F 273402080403001 Evans Groves 12AE 27 940 16F 273405080222601 Ruth Hallstrum Old Dixie Road 20 -- 17F 273409080265201 IR 252 Kings Highway 20 660 18F 273416080403001 Evans Groves 10AE 27 900 19F 273417080332201 Morrison Coves 2 JIMROD 2 24 1,010 20F 273423080332201 Morrison Groves 24 -- 21F 273430080195301 Seminole Shores 2.01 943 22F 273430080403001 Evans Groves 8AE 27 960 23F 273435080255101 USDA South Well 43rd Ave. 24.60 -- 24F 273445080401201 Evans Groves 6AE 27 900 25F 273446080215201 River Shores South of Oslo 5 720 26F 273459080401201 Evans Groves 4AE 27 900 27F 273501080301501 Dr. Moore Alternate Oslo Road 24 -- 28F 273501080302101 Dr. Moore Oslo Road 24 880 29F 273510080225301 Phillip Helseth Oslo Road 19.95 450 30F 273510080271901 Albert Helseth Oslo Road 19 -- 31F 273510080285501 Ocean Spray injection monitor 25 1,960 32F 273510080285502 Ocean Spray injection well 25 3,000 33F 273513080265201 IR 254 SR 505A & Oslo Road 21 760 34F 273513080401201 Evans Groves 2AE 27 920 35F 273522080235801 Oslo Nursery Oslo Road 22 800 104 399 Wells in the Floridan aquifer system used for data analysis --Continued 41F 273536080240201 County RO monitor well Altitude Depth Well Site Graves Groves Oslo Road of land of No. identification Well name surface well 44F No. Rancho Santa Maria 122 Ave. (feet) (feet) 36F 273524080262401 Albert Helseth Oslo Road 19 700 37F 273526080240701 County RO well No. 2 22 745 38F 273526080261001 Albert Helseth Oslo Road 19 -- 39F 273527080263001 Phillip Helseth Oslo Road 19 750 OF 273536080240101 County RO well No. 1 22.29 704 41F 273536080240201 County RO monitor well 22 901 42F 273539080301901 Graves Groves Oslo Road 25 836 43F 273542080372001 Tech -ohm Groves 25 -- 44F 273543080374101 Rancho Santa Maria 122 Ave. 24 -- 45F 273559080370301 Tech -ohm Groves 122 Ave. 24 -- 46F 273607080310301 Ball Groves 90th Ave. 24 1,100 47F 273615080283501 Jackson Groves Carter Ave. 21 860 48F 273616080470501 Latt Maxey 36 912 49F 273629080260401 IR 256 Lillian Lockwood 20 700 50F 273630080460601 Latt Maxey K-4 31 -- 51F 273632080364501 IR 266 Citrus Road & 90th Ave. 24.06 -- 52F 273633080351001 Gracewood Groves Heritage Road 24 1,100 53F 273633080364301 Rio Groves McClelland Road 25 -- 54F 273639080261501 L. Gollnick Groves 4th Street 22 900 55F 273649080452701 IR 202 Latt Maxey F-7 28 730 56F 273656080230701 Tropic Villas No. 2 8 703 57F 273710080230601 Tropic Villas No. 1. 8 660 58F 273719080225601 IR 243 12th Street 3 941 59F 273722080455901 Latt Maxey K-11 27 -- 60F 273723080255401' IR 255 Mr. Young 43rd Ave. 21 575 61F 273726080371501 Talmadge Brothers Groves 24 960 62F 273726080471701 Latt Maxey 32 -- 63F 273740080335701 Lykes Pasco No. 6 26 1,100 64F 273741080382701 Eder Groves 122nd Ave. 26 570 65F 273756080371401 Talmedge Bros. Groves 24 1,000 66F 273758080301501 Village Green Southwest 22 766 67F 273801080301701 Village Green South 90 Ave. 23 704 68F 273802080375701 Cardinal Groves 122 Ave. 26 540 69F 273805080223901 Vero Beach Power Plant No. 2 3 -- 70F 273807080450201 K. Prince St. Johns Marsh 24 750 105 400 Wells in the Floridan aquifer system used for data analysis --Continued Well No. Site identification No. Well name Altitude of land surface (feet) Depth of well (feet) 71F 273812080382701 Eder Groves 122nd Ave. 26 800 72F 273814080245201 IR 24 1st Christ Church 20 671 73F 273815080235101 IR 10/241 old VB Power Plant 20 665 74F 273818080235201 IR 200 old VB Power Plant 15 700 75F 273818080284801 Williams Groves SR 60 22 725 76F 273819080260101 IR 228 F Pollock SR 60 23.35 750 77F 273821080273901 Chauncey Hatch Jr. SR 60 21 746 78F 273822080374401 Cardinal Groves Pond Well 24 -- 79F 273822080374402 Cardinal Groves unused 23.00 604 80F 273827080322001 SR 60 West of I-95 23 -- 81F 273828080283801 Village Green No. 2 SR 60 23 780 82F 273828080283901 Village Green No. 1 SR 60 23 760 83F 273833080233901 IR 23 Episcopal Church 10 690 84F 273833080461901 IR 205 K Prince 28.06 -- 85F 273835080345801 Kromhout Groves SR 60 24 600 86F 273839080244101 Village Green MHP SR 60 20 -- 87F 273840080320701 Lambeth Groves SR 60 26 975 88F 273846080254701 USDA North Well 43rd Ave. 22 -- 89F 273852080283601 Village Green 26th St. aban. 20 562 90F 273854080464401 Eatmon Ranch 26 920 91F 273859080235101 30th Street Vero Beach 8.51 -- 92F 273900080232301 IR 240 Royal Palm Golf Club 5 550 93F 273905080241101 Vero Beach No. 21 Airport 20 688 94F 273912080241401 Vero Beach No 14 Airport 15 688 95F 273927080465701 Eatmon Ranch West 27 960 96F 273940080472101 Leroy Pressley SR 60 29 -- 97F 273945080281801 J. Johnson Barber Ave. 20 760 98F 273947080230501 Mosquito Control Well 5 -- 99F 273953080274801 IR 208 Frank Bates 20 700 10OF 273957080291501 Takaho Groves Block 13 & 14 19 882 101F 274005080244901 IR 230 South Gifford Road 19.34 720 102F 274008080255301 Jackson Groves S. Gifford Road 23.57 960 103F 274016080481601 K.D. Eatmon SR 60 36 -- 104F 274023080291401 Takaho Groves Blk 9 & 10 20 966 105F 274028080384301 Diamond G Farm SR 512 22 -- 106 401 Wells in the Floridan aquifer system used for data analysis --Continued 111F 274116080265001 IR 216 SR #505A Altitude Depth Well Site IR 233 Kennedy Grove of land of No. identification Well name surface well 114F No. Kings Highway (feet) (feet) 106F 274047080513701 USGS TH Site near Yeehaw 58 305 107F 274055080281301 IR 210 Walter Pool 19 650 108F 274113080475501 IR 185 W. Surrency 33 700 109F 274114080474901 L. Pressley Blue Cypress Road 31 550 110F 274115080291401 Takaho Groves Blk 1 & 2 20 886 111F 274116080265001 IR 216 SR #505A 21 635 112F 274121080241701 IR 233 Kennedy Grove 6.65 635 113F 274142080294301 IR 226 Ranch Road 21 -- 114F 274150080260901 Kings Highway 22 472 115F 274156080344301 Jack Berry Grove Blk 99 23 700 116F 274157080263801 Kings Highway 22 556 117F 274203080292901 Gracewood Groves 22 890 118F 274206080225501 Johns Island Well 2.90 2,020 119F 274210080400301 Fellsmere JV Ditch 33 18 700 120F 274216080264301 Kings Highway 22 579 121F 274223080371501 Fellsmere JV Ditch 32 24 600 122F 274226080242501 IR 234 North of Gifford 4 500 123F 274250080354401 Jack Berry Groves Blk 55 23 700 124F 274250080355001 Jack Berry Groves Blk 54 23 700 125F 274302080260901 Bruce Chalker 18 405 126F 274302080371501 Fellsmere JV Ditch 29 24 650 127F 274303080380401 Fellsmere JV Ditch 8 22 760 128F 2743090802450 IR 235 George Hamilton 5 500 129F 27430908026530't-CIBA Geigy Co. 24.32 651 130F 274310080293301 IR 58 Graves Bros. 20 400 131F 274313080283701 H. Prange 20 800 132F 274337080233901 IR 116 Jungle Trail 3 650 133F 274345080413201 Fellsmere JV Lat 26 20 460 134F 274350080364501 Jack Berry Groves Blk 11 24 708 135F 274404080233601 IR 114 R. Jones Jungle Trail 3 586 136F 274436080395801 Fellsmere JV Ditch 22 20 650 137F 274445080235901 IR 104 Deerfield Groves 3 1,000 138F 274447080235301 IR 108 Deerfield Groves 7 860 139F 274448080373201 IR 203 Dietz Well 22 590 140F 274449080240001 IR 107 Deerfield Groves 3 991 402 107 Wells in the Floridan aquifer system used for data analysis --Continued 108 403 Altitude Depth Well Site of land of No. identification Well name surface well No. (feet) (feet) 141F 274450080232401 Baytree AIA 8.30 1,050 142F 274452080275501 IR 147 A.S. Pfarr 21 620 143F 274455080263701 Johns Island Golf Course 37 560 144F 274459080490501 Rollins Ranch North of Yeehaw 31 416 145F 274501080282101 IR 160 West of Wabasso 20 600 146F 274502080395801 Fellsmere JV Ditch 20 20 650 147F 274503080413001 Fellsmere JV Lat 20 20 399 148F 274514080365601 Harold Platt 23 -- 149F 274522080304301 SR 510 South of River Bridge 20 465 150F 274524080240801 North Beach Water Co. No. 2 3 960 151F 274528080395801 Fellsmere JV Ditch 18 20 650 152F 274528080412901 Fellsmere JV Lat 18 22 -- 153F 274529080423001 Fellsmere JV Lat 18 & Q Canal 22 400 154F 274532080241801 North Beach Water Co. No. 1 3 1,000 155F 274534080251101 Marsh Island 3 390 156F 274538080281601 IR 155 Sebastian Highlands 21.52 -- 157F 274549080245201 IR 73 Deerfield Groves 3 800 158F 274552080242201 IR 82 Deerfield Groves 5 950 159F 274553080243801 IR 69 Deerfield Groves 3 550 160F 274553080245801 IR 72 Deerfield Groves 3 800 161F 274556080412901 Fellsmere JV Lat 16 20 405 162F 274557080343001 Carol City Aquarium 28 786 163F 274558080304201 John Bradley River Bridge 19 540 164F 274601080313801 IR 175 SR 510 19 600 165F 274603080485201 Rollins Ranch North of Yeehaw 28 - -- 166F 274606080335401 Schiner Memorial Well 31 -- 167F 274607080264001 Pelican Pointe 9 357 168F 274607080493001 USGS Observation Well IR 189 33.66 630 169F 274608080412901 Fellsmere JV Lat 15 20 405 170F 274609080502801 Rollins Ranch No. 1 42 605 171F 274621080300901 Roseland Acres 17.66 -- 172F 274623080503201 Oil Test Rollins Ranch 60 9,480 173F 274625080242101 Kohl at Wabasso Beach 7 1,272 174F 274635080244501 IR 60 Deerfield Groves 6 550 175F 274635080363001 IR 183 Joe Screws 24 640 108 403 Wells in the Floridan aquifer system used for data analysis --Continued 109 404 Altitude Depth Well Site of land of No. identification Well name surface well No. (feet) (feet) \176F 274636080244001 IR 59 Deerfield Groves 6 650 177F 274640080243401 IR 201 Deerfield Groves 8 883 178F 274640080243801 IR 52 Deerfield Groves 7 750 179F 274641080244701 IR 51 Deerfield Groves 20 800 18OF 274642080453601 Rollins Ranch pumphouse 27 600 181F 274646080243801 IR 50 Deerfield Groves 7 750 182F 274647080313401 IR 169 C L'Orange 18 525 183F 274650080413001 IR 186 Fellsmere JV Lat 12 20 -- 184F 274650080425901 Fellsmere JV Lat 12 20 340 185F 274650080440201 Fellsmere JV Lat 12 No. 1 20 380 186F 274659080244301 IR 49 B.F. Bailey 7 760 187F 274700080243901 IR 46 B.F. Bailey 8 850 188F 274700080245101 IR 47 B.F. Bailey 6 700 189F 274705080460301 Rollins Ranch Silage Road 20 600 190F 274705080470201 Rollins Ranch Silage Road No.l 20 600 191F 274706080454901 Rollins Ranch Silage Road No.2 20 600 192F 274712080491101 Rollins Ranch North of Yeehaw 28 -- 193F 274718080440201 Fellsmere JV Lat 10 20 360 194F 274719080274301 General Development Co. 25 510 195F 274744080465001 Blue Cypress Ranch 23 -- 196F 274751080480801 Blue Cypress Ranch nr old shop 23 -- 197F 274801080482001 Blue Cypress Ranch unused 24 -- 198F 274814080303301 Carl L'Orange Sebastian River 2 491 199F 274815080254101 IR 33 A.J. Byrd 3 540 20OF 274837080293501 Sebastian Country Club 22 840 2O1F 274838080275501 IR 131 P.R. Stevenson 7 -- 2O2F 274843080471401 Blue Cypress Ranch near shop 23 -- 203F 274857080493401 Yates Well near Sebastian 28 233 204F 274915080362501 IR 180 A. Beckman 25 425 2O5F 274916080520701 USGS TH Mace Ranch 53 260 2O6F 274921080254201 Indian River County AIA 5 -- 207F 274927080290601 B and S Fish Co. 22 700 208F 274935080282601 Sembler Well Sebastian 6 475 209F 274942080404001 Fellsmere Joint Venture 25 500 21OF 275018080261201 McLarty Museum 4.96 -- 109 404 Wells in the Floridan aquifer system used for data analysis --Continued *U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE: 19 8 9 '631'169/ 8 0 0 1 1 110 405 Altitude Depth Well Site of land of No. identification Well name surface well No. (feet) (feet) 211F 275047080292401 Kip Wagner Roseland 25 600 212F 275057080292301 Bob's Inn Roseland 26 409 213F 275108080271001 State Park Sebastian Inlet 5 480 214F 275114080265401 Mosquito Control Well Seb. Inlet 3 -- 215F 275117080270401 State Park Seb. Inlet unused 4.96 480 216F 275119080482401 Gilbert Tucker 21 594 217F 275210080272201 DR0624 Seb. Inlet Test Well 2 650 *U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE: 19 8 9 '631'169/ 8 0 0 1 1 110 405 �Ipq, q6-1 Lr) C �� LO 0 L 0 �CD �Q �r+ �c r rD(D �( rt 0 �LO a� r� 3 rD (� _. viai 3 �CD r+ 0 rD 01 r r D z z mn r D r 1�Q.4s a- L C: �t Lon Ln � o�o o00 + % rD N O =T'W LO `G - O W Q0 vii rD rD p n w Ln �G �- Un rD �- lQ rrDD -o C O -+, la O � O -< =�_ -%w Ln w r+-0 0 rD LA rD f+ O r+ rD S La LO — n O N O � c w ZO w La-• c w N O �o•�'� 3o 3rD Q rD n r+ 1�Q.4s a- G m70 E-< -h c. p c CL) r=3 Ln rD=3 �rD rD0- Ln O rDx LO QO o. n r+ m n d �,yoS--3 --i iC7 l!1 0C�TtI O LP G N �Cp O Q N D ° -.�o m "' O •� �' r1 � p u,' p r � l!1 c e+ Or+ p �n p O c rD rD C rD OLA O � � C � � c UXI rD _— O r+� n o f x � 07 = rl+ C) -Ln m� rD rD Mr-+ --% rD 3 Lo OrD cn QO rD rD C to C 0- --h rD un O. rD 3 � -h 0 L c "' 17"C rD Lo —. rD O < c C r+ r+ O � rCi rDO � :30 rD C Q cn w • vi 3• rD C O rD rD -0 O Ln :3 -N 0 rD r-+ r+ Di QO n 0, :3 r 0 N rD --h L Or+ n '< rD I lPq-qaO--L, -n 1 Lr) �p IL� V I J� s T 1 V \ pn0 p 70 — N 0 � — nZ0 N G) 0 < � O < C X o� c 3 rD rn r+ p vii n c c �- v rD a _ < tQ O O rD n rrD+ CL)r.+Ln rD fD O to M c' c n• r• r+ r+ rD rD �, -f, rDrD <Ln Ln O Q) rD `G X �. rD c -0C `G Ln tai) rD �n O• C rD r+ — r=r rD �. `G rD LO rD O- rDO -+ • W � O r.t. S O O Q Qo -1, to c r+ �. c < cu c rD O crD N O�, '� rD 0 O C rrDD� rD � 0 O rl O o rD ' rD Ln Qoc- — X c 0- ° un -� 3 O Ln n' , r) r+ -` Q (D n r+ - • rD C c• D c C rD Ln lPq-qaO--L, Ko O 3 Ln c LA r+ n O Q rr+ rD r+ �CC7 V1 m �'Pq. qoS-7 w CD 0 3 w lQ - P O 0-0 O1 D rD ET n O w rD (D a) r+ a, �- 7n Ln rD r+ r m rD a) rD -�' rD to _0 3 r -` C rD rD �-0 3 rD 10• 3 M C to n r+ r+ Ln Ko O 3 Ln c LA r+ n O Q rr+ rD r+ �CC7 V1 m �'Pq. qoS-7 3• o 3• o -0r+r+ S rD 3 Ell 7 *-< _T.1 r rD r+ Qo �< 0 l� c � r- r) c � c o r �- rD Qo n (D� - o — �, Q �- c ,< �cuQj L < r. � t �- LA �• ov --h o 3rD rD 0 7 Ln lQ Ln C r-) Lo _0 o r rD N O rD rD N m :3 r+ O0 O p rr+ .< -n `< —h FD O L Q 3 rD rD q- qo,� - 13 DISTRICT INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA MEMORANDUM TO: Honorable Emergency Services District Board of Commissioners THROUGH: Jason E. Brown, County Administrator THROUGH: Tad Stone, Director Department of Emergency Services FROM: Erin Sawyer, Staff Assistant IV Department of Emergency Services DATE: April 12, 2021 SUBJECT: Sole Source Purchase of Eleven (11) Stryker CR2 AED Defibrillators It is respectfully requested that the information contained herein be given formal consideration by the District Board of Commissioners at the next scheduled meeting. DESCRIPTIONS AND CONDITIONS Staff is seeking the sole source purchase of eleven (11) Stryker CR2 AED Defibrillators to replace our outdated LifePak 500's. The Board has designated the Stryker (formerly PhysioControl) Lifepak's as sole source since 2008, most recently on September 12, 2017. The Stryker LifePak 500's are found on Basic Life Support apparatuses and administration vehicles, throughout the fleet and have reached their end of life usage. Twenty (20) Stryker CR2 AED's have already been purchased from budgeted funds, and those AED's have been distributed and placed in many of our frontline units, while the others were provided to County lifeguards. At this time, staff is seeking approval to purchase an additional eleven (11) Styker CR2 AED Debrillators to replace the LifePak 500's. Staff has obtained price quotes for the proposed replacement of eleven (11) Lifepak 500's that are currently assigned, which reflects a trade in discount of eleven (11) older units. Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners declare asset numbers 19933, 23658, 23659, 23661, 23662, 23669, 23670, 23672, 23675, 23678, and 23679 as surplus and authorize their trade in for a $1,100 discount on the purchase of the new Stryker CR2's. These replacement Lifepaks will be funded through PEMT funds, which have already been acquired. FUNDING: Funding for the eleven (11) Stryker Lifepak's is available in the Emergency Services/Fire Rescue/Other Machinery & Equipment/PEMT Capital Budget account as follows: ACCOUNT NAME AMOUNT ACCOUNT NUMBER Emergency Services/Fire Rescue/Other Machinery & Equipment $19,302.25 11412022-066490-20023 406 RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Board declare asset numbers 19933, 23658, 23659, 23661, 23662, 23669, 23670, 23672, 23675, 23678, and 23679 as surplus, authorize their trade in and approve the sole source purchase of eleven (11) Stryker CR2 AED defibrillators. Staff also requests the Board renew the designation of Stryker as the sole source for Stryker CR2 AED Defibrillators, service and accessories. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Price Quote from Stryker 407 Delivery Address Name: INDIAN RIVER COUNTY FIRE Account #: 1334142 Address: 422543RD AVE VERO BEACH Florida 32967 End User - Shipping - Billing Name: INDIAN RIVER COUNTY FIRE Account #: 1334142 Address: 4225 43RD AVE VERO BEACH Florida 32967 Bill To Account Name: INDIAN RIVER COUNTY FIRE Account #: 1334142 Address: 4225 43RD AVE VERO BEACH Florida 32967 Equipment Products: Product DescriptionQty Sell Price Total 1.0--� 99512-001261 LIFEPAK CR2 Defibrillator, Semi -Automatic, WIFI, 11 $1,818.75 $20,006.25 English, carrying case, 8 year warranty. Includes 1 PR QUIK-STEPAelectrodes and 1 battery (4 years each), LIFELINKcentral AED Program Manager Basic Account, USB cable, Operating Instructions 2.0 11998-000321 Ambu Res -Cue Mask First Responder Kit 11 $36.00 $396.00 Equipment Total: $20,402.25 Trade In Credit: Product Description Qty Credit Ea'.. Total Credit TR-LP500B-LPCR2 TRADE -IN -STRYKER LIFEPAK 500 BIPHASIC TOWARDS 11 -$100.00 -$1,100.00 PURCHASE OF LIFEPAK CR2 Price Totals: Grand Total: Prices: In effect for 60 days. Terms: Net 30 Days Ask your Stryker Sales Rep about our flexible financing options. 1 408 Stryker Medical - Accounts Receivable - accountsreceivablet no strvkeccom - PO BOX 93308 - Chicago; It. 60673-.3308 $19,302.25 o OV-0_+�nj 3�Lpi�o pe, stryker C'bLOt C>, obCo-2S LIFEPAK CR2 AED - qty 11 (including trade- ins) Quote Number: 10268905 Remit to: Stryker Medical P.O. Box 93308 Version: 1 Chicago, IL 60673-3308 Prepared For: INDIAN RIVER COUNTY FIRE Rep: Amy Wood Attn: Email: amy.wood@stryker.com Phone Number: (561) 906-5429 Mobile: (561) 906-5429 Quote Date: 02/21/2021 Delivery Address Name: INDIAN RIVER COUNTY FIRE Account #: 1334142 Address: 422543RD AVE VERO BEACH Florida 32967 End User - Shipping - Billing Name: INDIAN RIVER COUNTY FIRE Account #: 1334142 Address: 4225 43RD AVE VERO BEACH Florida 32967 Bill To Account Name: INDIAN RIVER COUNTY FIRE Account #: 1334142 Address: 4225 43RD AVE VERO BEACH Florida 32967 Equipment Products: Product DescriptionQty Sell Price Total 1.0--� 99512-001261 LIFEPAK CR2 Defibrillator, Semi -Automatic, WIFI, 11 $1,818.75 $20,006.25 English, carrying case, 8 year warranty. Includes 1 PR QUIK-STEPAelectrodes and 1 battery (4 years each), LIFELINKcentral AED Program Manager Basic Account, USB cable, Operating Instructions 2.0 11998-000321 Ambu Res -Cue Mask First Responder Kit 11 $36.00 $396.00 Equipment Total: $20,402.25 Trade In Credit: Product Description Qty Credit Ea'.. Total Credit TR-LP500B-LPCR2 TRADE -IN -STRYKER LIFEPAK 500 BIPHASIC TOWARDS 11 -$100.00 -$1,100.00 PURCHASE OF LIFEPAK CR2 Price Totals: Grand Total: Prices: In effect for 60 days. Terms: Net 30 Days Ask your Stryker Sales Rep about our flexible financing options. 1 408 Stryker Medical - Accounts Receivable - accountsreceivablet no strvkeccom - PO BOX 93308 - Chicago; It. 60673-.3308 $19,302.25 stryker LIFEPAK C112 AED - qty 11 (including trade- ins) Quote Number: 10268905 Remit to: Stryker Medical P.O. Box 93308 Version: 1 Chicago, IL 60673-3308 Prepared For: INDIAN RIVER COUNTY FIRE Rep: Amy Wood Attn: Email: amy.wood@strykercom Phone Number: (561) 906-5429 Mobile: (561) 906-5429 Quote Date: 02/21/2021 AUTHORIZED CUSTOMER SIGNATURE 2 Stryker Medical - Accounts Receivable - accountsreceivable0strvker.com - PO BOX 93308 - Chicago, IL 60673-3308 KI] Deal Consummation: This is a quote and not a commitment. This quote is subject to final credit, pricing, and documentation approval. Legal documentation must be signed before your.equipment can be delivered. Documentation will be provided upon completion of our review process and your selection of a payment schedule. Confidentiality Notice: Recipient will not disclose to any third party the terms of this quote or any other information, including any pricing or discounts, offered to be provided by Stryker to Recipient in connection with this quote, without Stryker's prior written approval, except as may be requested by law or by lawful order of any applicable government agency. Terms: Net 30 days. FOB origin. A copy of Stryker Medical's standard terms and conditions can be obtained by calling Stryker Medical's Customer Service at 1 -800 -Stryker. In the event of any conflict between Stryker Medical's Standard Terms and Conditions and any other terms and conditions, as may be included in any purchase order or purchase contract, Stryker's terms and conditions shall govern. Cancellation and Return Policy: In the event of damaged or defective shipments, please notify Stryker within 30 days and we will remedy the situation. Cancellation of orders must be received 30 days prior to the agreed upon delivery date. If the order is cancelled within the 30 day window, a fee of 25% of the total purchase order price and return shipping charges will apply. 410 DISTRICT INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA . MEMORANDUM TO: Honorable Emergency Services District Board of Commissioners THROUGH: Jason E. Brown, County Administrator THROUGH: Tad Stone, Director Department of Emergency Services FROM: Erin Sawyer, Staff Assistant .IV Department of Emergency Services DATE: April 12, 2021 SUBJECT: Sole Source Purchase of Eight (8) Stryker Lifepak 15 v4 Cardiac Monitors It is respectfully requested that the information contained herein be given formal consideration by the District Board of Commissioners at the next scheduled meeting. DESCRIPTIONS AND CONDITIONS: Staff is seeking the sole source purchase of eight (8) Stryker Lifepak 15 v4 Cardiac Monitors. The Board has designated Stryker (formerly PhysioControl) Lifepak's as sole source since 2008, most recently on September 12, 2017..The Stryker Lifepak's are found on each Advanced Life Support (ALS) unit throughout the fleet and have reached their end of life usage. Staff has obtained price quotes for the proposed replacement of eight (8) Lifepak's that are currently assigned, which reflects a trade in discount of eight (8) older units, the trade in for the outdated units has already been deducted from the base unit price. Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners declare asset numbers 27657, 27658, 27659, 27655, 27656, 27909, 24910, and 27502 as surplus and authorize their trade in for a 50% discount on the purchase of the new Lifepak's. The replacement Lifepak's are considered an approved expense under the CARES Act funding. This purchase will complete the multi-year replacement program for all Version 1 and Version 2 Lifepak's within the fleet. FUNDING: Funding for the eight (8) Stryker Lifepak's is an allowable expense and funds are available in the Emergency Services District/Fire Rescue/Other Machinery & Equipment/CARES Act account (11412022-066490- 20701). Account Name Amount Account Number. Emergency Services District/Fire Rescue/Other Machinery & Equipment/CARES Act $149,899.60 11412022-066490-20701 411 RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Board declare asset numbers 27657, 27658, 27659, 27655, 27656, 27909, 24910; and 27502 as surplus, authorize their trade in and approve the sole source purchase of eight (8) Stryker Lifepak 15 v4 Cardiac Monitors. Staff also recommends the Board extend the term of Stryker's sole source designation for Lifepak 15 purchases and accessories for an additional 3 -year period. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Price Quote from Stryker 412 stryker 8 LIFPEK 15 V4 upgrade Quote Number: 10357999 Version: 1 Prepared For: INDIAN RIVER COUNTY FIRE Attn : Quote Date: 04/12/2021 Expiration .Date: 12/31/2030 Remit to: Stryker Medical Masi moT`°M=LNCS DCIP, Pediatric Reusable SpO2 only P.O. Box 93308 $195.65 Chicago, IL 60673-3308 Rep: Amy Wood Email: amy.wood@stryker.com Phone Number: (561) 906-5429 Mobile: (561) 906-5429 A Delivery Address End User - Shipping - Billing Bill T6. Account Name: INDIAN RIVER COUNTY FIRE Name: INDIAN RIVER COUNTY FIRE Name\\ � INDIAN RIVER COUNTY FIRE Account#: 1334142 Account #: 1334142 Address: 4225 43RD AVE Address: 4225 43RD AVE 1334142 Address: 4225 43RD AVE VERO BEACH VERO BEACH r�� VERO BEACH Florida 32967 Florida 32967 Florida 32967 Equipment Products: Product Description Qty Sell Price Total 1.0 99577-001955 LIFEPAK 15 V4 Monitor/Defib - Manual.&-AED, Trending, 8 $16,545.00 $132,360.00 Noninvasive Pacing, Sp02, NIBP, 12 -Load E'CG, EtCO2, BT. Incl at N/C: 2 p QC Electrodes (11.996'000091) & 1 Test Load (21330-001365) per device1,4,SJc Manual CD (26500-003612) per order 2.0 41577-000284 Ship Kit -QUIK-COMBO Therapy 'Cable;,2 rolls100mm 8 $0.00 $0.00 Paper; RC -4, Patient Cable, 4ft.; NIBP'Hose, Coiled; NIBP Cuff, Reusable, adult; 12 -Lead ECG Cable, 4 -Wire Limb Leads, 5ft; 12 -Lead ECG Cable; 6 -Wire Precordial attachment 3.0 21330-001176 LP 15 Lithium -ion Battery 5; Tamp hrs 16 $321.10 $5,137.60 4.0 11171-000082 MasimoTM;RC Patient Cable -EMS, 4 FT. 8 $162.50 $1,300.00 5.0 11171-000046 MasimoTMM-LNCS@ DCI .Adult Reusable Sp02 only 8 $195.65 $1,565.20 Sensor. For use-with•RC-Patient Cable. 6.0 11171-000047 Masi moT`°M=LNCS DCIP, Pediatric Reusable SpO2 only 1 $195.65 $195.65 Sensor. For use with -RC Patient Cable. 7.0 11160-000013 NIBP Cliff-Reusable?Child 1 $16.90 $16.90 rf .� 8.0 11160-000017 NIBP Cuff -Reusable, Large Adult '♦ 1 $23.40 $23.40 ti'. , r 9.0 11577-000002 LIFEPAK 15,Basic carry case w/right & left pouches; 1 $219.05 $219.05 shoulder '-strap (11577-000001) included at no additional charge when case ordered with a LIFEPAK 15 device 10.0 11220-000028 15 Carry case top pouch 1 $39.65 $39.65 �LIFEPAK 11.0 11260-000039/ /'LIFEPAK 15 Carry case back pouch 1 $56.55 $56.55 413 1 Stryker Medical - Accounts Receivable - accountsreceivableCo stryker.com - PO BOX 93308 - Chicago, IL 60673-3308 stryker 8 LIFPEK 15 V4 upgrade Quote Number: 10357999 Version: 1 Prepared For: INDIAN RIVER COUNTY FIRE Attn : Quote Date: 04/12/2021 Expiration Date: 12/31/2030 Remit to: Stryker Medical P.O. Box 93308 Chicago, IL 60673-3308 Rep: Amy Wood Email: amy.wood@stryker.com Phone Number: (561) 906-5429 Mobile: (561) 906-5429 Equipment Total: $140,914.00 ProCare Products: Product ! Descriiption L --Qty Sell Price ;Total 12.1 78000008 ProCare LIFEPAK 15 Prevent Service: Annual onsite 8 $1,123.20 $8,985.60 preventive maintenance inspection and unlimited repairs including parts, labor and travel with battery coverage for LIFEPAK 15 V4 Monitor/Defib - Manual & AED,- Trending, Noninvasive Pacing, Sp02, NIBP, 12 -Lead ECG, EtCO2, BT. Incl at N/C: 2 pr QC Electrodes (11996-000091) & 1 Test Load (21330 -001365) -per' device, 1 Svc Manual CD (26500-003612) per order ProCare Total: $8,985.60 Price Totals: Estimated Sales Tax (0.000%) Freight/Shipping: Grand Total: Prices: In effect for 60 days. Terms: Net 30 Days Contact your local Sales Representative for more information about our flexible payment options. 414 2 Stryker Medical - Accounts Receivable - accountsreceivablenstryker.com - PO BOX 93308 - Chicago, IL 60673-3308 $0.00 $0.00 $149,899.60 stryker 8 LIFPEK 15 V4 upgrade Quote Number: 10357999 Version: 1 Prepared For: INDIAN RIVER COUNTY FIRE Attn : Quote Date: 04/12/2021 Expiration, Date: 12/31/2030 AUTHORIZED CUSTOMER SIGNATURE Remit to: Stryker Medical P.O. Box 93308 Chicago, IL 60673-3308 Rep: Amy Wood Email: amy.wood@stryker.com Phone Number: (561) 906-5429 Mobile: (561) 906-5429. 415 3 Stryker Medical - Accounts Receivable - accountsreceivablenstrvkercom - PO BOX 93308 - Chicago, IL 60673-3308 Capital Terms and Conditions: Deal Consummation: This is a quote and not a commitment. This quote is subject to final credit, pricing, and documentation approval. Legal documentation must be signed before your equipment can be delivered. Documentation will be provided upon completion of our review process and your selection of a payment schedule. Confidentiality Notice: Recipient will not disclose to any third party the terms of this quote or any other information, including any pricing or discounts, offered tAe provided by Stryker to Recipient in connection with this quote, without Stryker's prior written, approval, except as may be requested by law or by lawful order of any applicable government agency. A copy of Stryker Medical's Acute Care capital: terms and conditions can be found at,htt s: techweb.strvker.com/Terms Conditions/index.html. A copy of Stryker Medical's E found Care capital terms and conditions can be found at h_ttos://www.strykeremer4en�cyc�are_;ccom%terms. a. 416 15-- e - 3. SWDD Item Indian River County, Florida Solid Waste Disposal District Board Memorandum Date: April 9, 2021 To: Jason E. Brown, County Administrator From: Vincent Burke, PE, Director of Utility Services Prepared By: Himanshu H. Mehta, PE, Managing Director, Solid Waste Disposal District Subject: Final Pay to Geosyntec for Work Order No. 6 -Permit Compliance Monitoring and Reporting — Indian River County Landfill Descriptions and Conditions: On December 10, 2019, the Solid Waste Disposal District (SWDD) Board approved CCNA-2018-Work Order No. 6 to Geosyntec Consultants, Inc. (Geosyntec) In the amount of $176,511.29. This is.in accordance with requirements by the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) for permit compliance monitoring and reporting for the year 2020. Geosyntec's authorized scope of work included project management/meetings, semi-annual sampling and reporting, quarterly assessment monitoring, Title V permit compliance, and technical compliance support. Analysis: Geosyntec has satisfactorily completed all of the tasks described in the scope of work for a total invoiced amount of $177,261.29, which includes the final invoice of $4,008.59, which includes permit fees of $750.00 paid to the FDEP for the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit ($500) and Title V Emissions fee ($250). Attached is Geosyntec's project completion report describing in more details the services provided under this work order. Funding: Funding for this work is budgeted and available in the engineering and license/permits accounts. Description Account Number Amount Engineering 41121734-033130 $3,258.59 Licenses and Permits 41121734-034970 $ 750.00 Total = $4,008.59 417 SWDD Agenda - Final Pay to Geosyntec WO CCNA -2018 -WO No. 6ec WO CCNA-2018-WO No. 6 Page 1 of 2 SWDD Item Recommendation: Solid Waste Disposal District staff recommends that its Board approve.Geosyntec Consultants, Inc.'s final invoice amount of $4,008.59, which includes permit fees of $750 that were paid by Geosyntec, which were above and beyond the original approved work order. Attachment: 1. Geosyntec Project Completion Report & Invoice 418 SWDD Agenda - Final Pay to Geosyntec WO CCNA -2018 -WO No. 6ec WO CCNA-2018-WO No. 6 Page 2 of 2 Geosyntec consultants Mr. Himanshu H. Mehta, P.E. Managing Director Solid Waste Disposal District Indian River County 1325 74th:Avenue SW Vero Beach, Florida 32968 1200 Riverplace Blvd., Suite 710 Jacksonville, Florida 32207 FH 904.858.1818 FAX 904.396.1143 www.gdosyntec.com 6 April 2021 Subject: Project Management Completion Report and Transmittal of Invoice No. 430289 IRC — 2020 Permit Compliance Monitoring and Reporting IRC Work Authorization No. CCNA-2018-Work Order No. 6 Indian River County Landfill Facility, Vero Beach, Florida Dear Mr. Mehta: INTRODUCTION Geosyntec Consultants, Inc. (Geosyntec) is pleased to. present to you this project completion report for Geosyntec Project No. FL3738 — 2020 Permit Compliance Monitoring and Reporting for the Indian River County Landfill Facility. This project was completed under Work Order No. CCNA-2018-Work Order No. 6 authorized on December 10, 2019, pursuant to that certain Continuing Contract Agreement for Professional Services, dated April 17, 2018 (collectively referred to as the "Agreement"), by and between INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Florida ("COUNTY") and Geosyntec ("Consultant'). This report has been prepared as a supplement to our final invoice No. 430289, dated 31 March 2021. SCOPE OF WORK The scope of work authorized under Work. Order No. CCNA-2018-Work Order No. 6 was divided into five phases: (i) general consulting/meeting support/project management; (ii) Semi - Annual Sampling and Reporting; (iii) Quarterly Assessment Monitoring and Reporting; .(iv) Title V Permit Compliance and Reporting; and :(v) Technical and Miscellaneous Permit Compliance Support and Reporting. The following is a phase by phase summary of the work that Geosyntec performed under this Work Order. engineers I scientists I innovators 419 Mr. Himanshu H. Mehta, P.E. 6 April 2Q1 Page 2 Phase 1— General Consulting/Meeting Support/Proiect Management Under this phase, Geosyntec performed project planning and management responsibilities, such as meetings and correspondences with SWDD, ENCO Labs, Republic, and the Florida Department of Environmental: Protection (FDEP); invoice review and preparation; project coordination; and project administration. Phase:2 — Semi -Annual Sampling and Reporting Under this phase, Geosyntec completed the January and July 2020 semi-annual sampling and prepared the water -quality monitoring reports for the Class I Landfill and C&D Debris Disposal Facility for submittal to FDEP as required by the WQMP. Geosyntec also prepared responses to comments on the January 2020 semi-annual monitoring report for the Class I Landfill. Phase 3 — Ouarterly Assessment Monitoring and Reporting Under this phase, Geosyntec completed the January, April, July and October 2020 quarterly sampling and prepared the water -quality assessment monitoring reports for the C&D Debris Disposal Facility select groundwater wells and surface water locations for submittal to FDEP as required by the WQMP and the October 14, 2019 correspondence from FDEP to SWDD. Phase 4 — Title V Permit Compliance and'Reporting Under this phase, Geosyntec prepared and submitted the Title V Air Permit compliance monitoring reports (including the annual statement of compliance, electronic annual operating report (EAOR), semi-annual monitoring reports, and annual LFG sulfur content testing and emissions report. As requested by SWDD, Geosyntec paid the Annual Title V Emissions fee of $250 to FDEP on behalf of SWDD. Phase,5 - Technical and Miscellaneous Permit Compliance Support and Reporting Under this phase, Geosyntec provided SWDD with technical support and miscellaneous permit compliance support services related to the Class 1 Landfill and C&D Debris Disposal Facility including; among other things: • reporting required by the Multi -Sector Generic Permit for stormwater discharge; • quarterly monitoring and reporting of the LFG monitoring wells located at the perimeter of the site and also in enclosed structures; • miscellaneous permit and compliance support services; engineers I scientists I innovators 420 Mr. Himanshu H. Mehta, P.E. 6 April 2021 Page 2 • :assistance with preparing annual budgets for SWDD; and • . sampling and. reporting for additional monitoring wells and surface Water for the C&D debris disposal facility depending on the results of the semi-annual and quarterly sampling and analytical testing; and As requested by SWDD, Geosyntec paid the NPDES Permit renewal fee of $500 to FDEP on behalf of SWDD. BUDGET The approved budget for Work Order No. CCNA-2018-Work Order No. 6 was $176,511.29. The total invoiced amount, including the final invoice is $177,261.29, which includes the FDEP permit fees of $750 ($250 for EAOR and $500 for NPDES) that were paid on behalf of SWDD. Therefore, Geosyntec completed this project within the approved -budget. CLOSURE Geosyntec appreciates the opportunity to provide services to Indian River County. If you have any question regarding this correspondence, please feel free to contact the undersigned at (904) 450-4259. Sincerely Kwasi Badu-Tweneboah, Ph.D., P.E. Principal Engineer Enclosure: Invoice No. 430289. engineers I. scientists I innovators 421 Geosyntecc> consultants Mr. Himanshu H. Mehta, P.E.. Managing Director Solid Waste Disposal District Indian River County 1325 74th Avenue Southwest Vero Beach, Florida 32968 1200 Riverplace Blvd., Suite 710 Jacksonville, Florida 32207 PH 904 858.1818 FAX 904.396.1143 www..geosyntec.com 2 April 2021 Subject: Project Management Report and Transmittal of Invoice No. 430289 IRC — 2020 Permit Compliance Monitoring and Reporting Indian River County Landfill Facility. Dear Mr. Mehta: Geosyntec Consultants, Inc. (Geosyntec) prepared this project management report to address the professional services for the 2020 Permit Compliance. Monitoring and Reporting project at the Indian River County .(IRC) landfill facility. This report presents: (i) a budget overview for this project; (ii) a summary of activities completed to date; (iii) a discussion of the work reflected on the enclosed invoice; (iv) a discussion of ongoing work; and (v) recommended actions for the site. The enclosed invoice reflects work that was performed through 28 February 2021. Table 1. provides invoicing details for the project. PROJECT MANAGEMENT SUMMARIES Geosyntec's Proiect No. FL3738: 2020 Permit Compliance Monitoring and Reporting -- Indian River County Landfill Facility (IRC Work Authorization No. CCNA-2018 Work Order No. 6) Budget Overview Invoice No. 430289 (enclosed) dated 31 March 2021 for $4,008.59 is the 15th and final invoice for Project No. FL3738. This invoice includes $750.00 permit fees beyond the approved lump sum budget. Listed below is a summary of the budget, including invoiced amount and remaining budget. Approved Budget: $176,511.29 Invoiced Amount: $177,261.29 Remaining Budget $0.00 FL3738-01\FL3738_JL21024 engineers I scientists 1 innovators 422 Mr. Himanshu H. Mehta, P.E. 2 April 2021 Page 2 WORK COMPLETED TO DATE The tasks performed under this invoice include: preparation and. submission of the hydrogen sulfide testing results and 2020 annual emissions report to FDEP and SWDD; correspondence with SWDD and FDEP; and project administration, including project management and invoicing. WORK REFLECTED ON ENCLOSED INVOICE Labor reflected on the enclosed invoice is mainly attributed to the following: • Labor indicated as professional services ($3,258.59) is associated with preparation and submittal of the 2020 annual emissions report, and project management, including invoicing. • Other expenses are associated with communications fee and other direct expenses and are built into the lump sum amount above. • Permit fees of $750.00 paid to the FDEP for the NPDES Permit renewal fee ($500) and Title V Annual Emissions fee ($250). ONGOING WORK. Geosyntec has completed the scope of work under this Work Order.. RECOMMENDED ACTIONS None engineers I scientists I innovators 423 Mr. Himanshu H. Mehta, P.E. 26 Febmary 2021 Page 3 CLOSURE Geosyntec appreciates the opportunity to provide services to Indian River County. If you have any questions regarding this correspondence; please feel free to contact me at 904.450.4259. Sincerely, Kwasi Badu-Tweneboah, Ph.D., P.E. Principal Engineer Enclosure — Invoice No. 430289 424 Table 1 Summary of Invoices Submitted for Geosyntec's Project Number 3738 IRC — 2020 Permit Compliance Monitoring and Reporting Geosyntec Project Number/IRC Work Authorization Number Invoice No. Invoice Date Amount FL3738/CCNA2018- WORK ORDER No. 6 391099 01/20/2020 $2,140.00 392563 02/07/2020 $20,959.04 395485 03/11./2020 $11,915:81 399139 04/17/2020 $13,059.79 401547 05/14/2020 $15,468.21 404929 06/17/2020 $13,983.60 407815 07/24/2020 $9,969.60 409499 08/10/2020 $10,344.20 412302 9/11/2020 $20,292.29 414869 10/8/2020 $15,806.46 416994 11/2/2020 $15,493.75 421785 12/20/2020 $4,167.89 424363 1/21/2021 $8,668.56 427549 2/26/2021 $10,983.50 430289 3/31/2021 $4,008.59 TOTAL $177,261.29 FL3738-01TL3738 JL21024 425 Geosyntec'-'e consultants PLEASE REMIT PAYMENT TO: Geosyntec Consultants 900 Broken Sound Parkway NW, Suite 200 Boca Raton, Florida 33487-2775 USA Tel (561) 995-0900 Fax (561) 995-0925 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY SWDD 1326 74TH AVENUE SW VERO BEACH, FL 32968 Invoice #: 430289 Project: FL3738 Invoice Date: 3/31/2021 Attention: HIMANSHU MEHTA, P.E. For Professional Services Rendered through transaction date: 2/28/2021 Project Name: 2020 COMPLIANCE MONITORING REPORTI IF YOU HAVE QUESTIONS ABOUT THIS INVOICE, PLEASE CONTACT DR. KWASI BADU-TWENEBOAH AT 904-450-4259 CCNA-2018 WORK ORDER NO.6 426 Phase Fee % Complete Previously Billed Amount Due This Invoice Total Invoiced To Date 01) GC/MEETING SUPPORT/PM 26,198.20 100.00 24,102.34 2,095.86 26,198.20 Phase Fee Complete Previously Billed Total Invoiced To Date 02) SEMIANNUAL SAMPLING N REPORTING 61,860.79 100.00 61,860.79 61,860.79 Phase Fee o Complete Previously Billed Total Invoiced To Date 03) QUARTERLY ASSESSMENT MONITORING 31,270.90 100:00 31,270.90 31,270.90 Phase Fee % Complete Previously Billed Amount Due This Invoice Total Invoiced To Date 04) TITLE V PERMIT. COMPLIANCE 29,068.40 100:00 27,905.66 1,162.74 29,068.40 Phase Fee Complete Previously Billed Total Invoiced To Date 05) TECHNICAL COMPLIANCE SUPPORT 28,113.00 100.00 28,113.00 28,113.00 426 427 Total Contract Fee $176,511.29 Total % Complete To Date 100.00 % Total Fee Earned To Date $176,511.29 Less Previous Billings $173,252.70 Permit Fees $750.00 Total This Invoice $4,008.59 *"Amount Due this Invoice** $4,008.59 Statement Prior Billings $173,252.70 Project Budget $176,511.29 Current Invoice $4,008.59 Billed to Date $177,261.29 Billed To Date (Includes Retainage) $177,261.29 Contract Balance $0.00 Paid To Date $173,252.70 **Amount Due This Invoice** $4,008.59 Permit Fees were paid on behalf of SWDD (see attached backup) 427 150b•L1r SWDD Item Indian River County, Florida Solid Waste Disposal District Board Memorandum Date: April 9, 2021 To: Jason E. Brown, County Administrator From: Vincent Burke, PE, Director of Utility Services Prepared By: Himanshu H. Mehta, PE, Managing Director, Solid Waste Disposal District (SWDD) Subject: Request to Expand SWDD Recycling Education Services Descriptions and Conditions: The Solid Waste Disposal District (SWDD) provides for the administration and management of the recycling collection and education program throughout Indian River County (IRC). Since the start of the single stream recycling program in 2015, we have noticed a dramatic increase in participation in the program as well as achieving the third highest recycling rate (66%) throughout the State of Florida in 2019. Unfortunately, the preliminary results submitted for 2020 has resulted in a decline of our recycling rate to 53%. Therefore, staff is requesting SWDD Board approval to expand the recycling funding and resources within our department. The goal is to expand the recycling education services provided while directly engaging with our residential and commercial customers. Analysis: The SWDD Recycling department (#255) consists of one marketing and education coordinator with an overall budget of $365,154, which includes salary, benefits, marketing, advertising, promotional materials, fuel/ maintenance of the vehicle assigned to this department, and excludes other contractual operations. For Fiscal Year (FY) 2020/2021*, the recycling department has done, or planned, the following activities: • Marketing and Advertising Campaigns (7) • Recycling Campaigns and Activities (16) • Recycling Education Presentations (over 50) • Recycling Audits (Over 30) • Reports, Grants, and Documentations * Please see attached complete summary. With additional funding and resources, staff can expand our programs to include such things as: • Locks for multi -family units pilot program • Residential/commercial composting pilot program • Waste Wizard Program • Community garden pilot program • Green Co community compactor pilot SSWDD Agenda.- Request to Expand SWDD Education Services Page 1 o42g SWDD Item • Community Reuse Shop pilot (to be located within the new Household Hazardous Waste facility) • New Residence Welcome Package for realtors • Revise and update signage at all Customer Convenience Centers • Second phase of Beach Basket Program rollout • Recycling Data Collection from Commercial Vendors The expanded funding would also be used for these future tools and resources: • Collection events tools and supplies -Grabbers • Bags or buckets, gloves • ClearStream containers and bags • Large tent with logo - cones, tables and chairs • Expand SWDD recycling promotional items • Personal protective wear for tours and events • Truck/SUV and trailer for events • Office Supplies - furniture, phone, computer • Expansion of "niche" events - grant writing, beach basket program expansion and supplies; and expanded signage and marketing budget Funding: Funding for the SWDD recycling marketing and education is budgeted and available in the SWDD recycling department, which is funded from SWDD assessments and user fees. Description Account Number Amount Recycling Department 411-255 $TBD A possible option to enhance departmental funding is to bring in-house the recycling education services currentlyprovided by Keep Indian River Beautiful, which has a current funding of $55,454 per year. Recommendation: Solid Waste Disposal District staff recommends that its Board approve the expansion -of the in-house recycling education funding for Fiscal Year 2021/2022, which may include, but not limited to, adding an additional staff member, additional vehicle, additional resources and the removal of the funding to Keep Indian River Beautiful. Attachment (s): SWDD Recycling Activities SSWDD Agenda - Request to Expand SWDD Education Services Page 20V9 SWDD Recycling Activities Current Activities: 1. Marketing and Advertising Campaigns - General Recycling Campaign Batteries Campaign Styrofoam Campaign Cooking Oil Campaign Light Bulbs Campaign Holiday Campaign WRAP Campaign • Radio Add spots and interviews • Television and Theatre • Printed Material: Mailers Tip cards Newspapers, magazines, flyers • Internet: Web page Virtual landfill tour • SWDD shirts Q RECYCLE & dry ,. amply, bags plastic bags & wraps �'t of e�fr e! fbo 0 Cvalanrer Cnnwrfcnoq Ccnfa.x or fma Alain 4anGRt1 r }I 1 maa FAa Asa i*. 4c»ryclen<mfaeM 22i�lYtY ® ', 2. Recycling Campaigns and Activities- * Beach Basket Campaign • Yard Waste Campaign • Shredding Event • Household/Hazardous Waste Collection Event • County Events: All races and runs Annual Coastal Clean Up 430 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 Annual Oslo Road Cleanup Brew Fest Christmas Parade Community Night Out Event Earth Day Festival Fire Fighters Fair Halloween Parade Hurricane Expo Lagoon Literacy Event Lionfish Festival Pelican Island Wildlife Festival Shrimp Festival WRAP Campaign Cooking Oil Campaign Contamination Campaign New Cart Lid Label Campaign Commercial Recycling Campaign Statewide Food Recovery Week Landfill and MRF tours o Quarterly Library Trash Talks 3. Civic Organizations- 'am Please, the BLUECARTIS ONLYtor RECYCABLE materials. ..........\ ® Recycle Florida Today board member 0 Sustainable Events Network (SENFC) board member o School District Green. Team board member 0 Environmental Coalition board member o Florida League of Cities board member ® RFT/FDEP recycling breakout committees 0 Sunrise Rotary member �s 1 431 4. Non-profit Organizations- • Archie Carr Wildlife Rescue • Clear Water Coalition • Coastal Connections board member • Environmental Learning Center • FAU Harbor Branch • KIRB board member. • ORCA • Pelican Island Audubon Society • Rotaries • St. Johns Waterway • US Fish and Wildlife • Vero Goes Zero 5. Recycling Education- • Recycling presentations in all Public, Private and Charter schools • Recycle Audits • Implemented and help maintain recycling at all Public and Charter schools • Participate in school recycling clubs • Florida Tour of Counties Presentation • Drop Savers Program • Recycling Toolkits: Schools Multi -family Commercial Recycle Florida Today 6. CARTer • Carter's Corner 432 7. Recycling Audits- • Bi -weekly residential cart audits • County Parks and Recreation • County Government Buildings. • Commercial audits • Door Hanger Blitz 8. Reports, Grants, and Documentation- • RETRAC and annual FDEP report • Recycle Across America license agreement and label creation • Waste Management Grant • Hinkley Center/Dr. Townshend assessment tool project • Budgets and Invoicing • Monthly Recycling Index • Board of County Commissioners agenda items and updates • Landfill closure information to all municipalities 9. Vendors- • AmeriMark • Busch • City of Vero Beach • ClearStream • Cutting Edge Sign Art • Minuteman Printing • Nicolace Marketing • ReCollect • Republic Services • Uline • Waste Management • Waste Pro • Polywrap Recycling Polywrop } necvcuda.. _. Q RACK'n� I NT 433 10. Community Presentations (see attached) Future Pilot Programs:. • Locks for multi -family units pilot program • Residential/commercial composting pilot program • Waste Wizard Program • Community garden pilot program • Green Co community compactor pilot • Community Reuse Shop pilot • New Residence Welcome Package for realtors • Revise and update signage at all Customer Convenience Centers • Second phase of Beach Basket Program rollout -AVER ��r•� oak \EcYcv� 434 Tools and Resources o Collection events tools and supplies - Grabbers Bags or buckets Gloves ClearStream containers and bags Large tent with logo Cones Tables and Chairs SWDD recycling promotional items Personal protective wear for tours and events Truck/SUV and trailer for events e Office Supplies - Furniture Phone Computer e Expansion of "niche" events - Grant writing Beach Basket Program expansion and supplies Expanded signage and marketing budget 435 • The Moorings • John's Island North • John's Island North Green Team • John's Island South • Waterway Village • Vista Plantation • Vista Gardens Vista Royale • Grand Harbor • Fairways at Grand Harbor • Beach Walk • Indian River Estates • Sea Oaks • Rock Ridge Community • Swan Lake Village Green • Point Sienna • Grove Isle • Sebastian Lakes • South Gate Village • Oceangate Condominiums HOA Presentations Other Presentations • Main County Library • Environmental Learning Center • Rotary Club of Vero Beach 436 • Clean Water Coalition • Wellness Committee of IRC School District • School Board • Sebastian Elementary Parent Night • McKee Gardens • Heritage Center • Kiwanis Club • South County Community Meeting • ORCA • Dining with the Dems • Roseland Community Association • Harbor Chase Palm Estates • Rotary Oceanside • City of Sebastian Natural Resource Board • Vero Beach Library -Quarterly Trash Talks • USDA • Morning Star Church • Women's Aviation Group • Utilitarian Church • Environmental Learning Center 437 W WO (7 CL Q ' (D <' M rD o w 3 N N_ CD x 3 w o� m rDCL un 0 N D W rD pq rDD n r+ 3 -<o N O n O n a - A• ON rD n, Gti �• f7 m rt Ln 0 fD fD fD n ��_ m �. �• � 3 — (D rt a) � w `.c cn r+ Q c0 r� — r+ m — rt N C/1 — 0 C. m M N N: fV N N N N N N N .� 00 O O O O O O O O M II1 v -► � m A o � u c. O lD 00 �I �l CJ1 P W N F� "i N N wA ter-+ w to o0 00 TI a N N N 10 w OD 0010 v w rn I'* W al N Ut W N W lD w : � /+ Ln ;C oQ 1 o o pe O � � C'1 ro rt Ln C), C) 10 UI :LU .W W .N . 0 0000 :W CD N N O C) Ln rIj mO 0-4 0 2 Di 0 t° 00 00 V! � tp 00 yl Q II1 v -► � m A o � u c. C) Ln rIj 0 0-4 w N °V° O t° 00 00 `. tp 00 yl Q v al W o � n o ()) 0000 V V N V C N N wA ter-+ w to o0 00 Ln a N N N 10 w OD 0010 v w rn I'* W al N Ut W N W lD w O /+ Ln CM oQ al o d pe C) 0 0 Tons 0 b" g 0 0 0 0 N a t° I.- N O Q v Q o � n o N N V C o � 0 Ln w 0 N N N 10 � OD O Vt V N ro N �Ln O o Ln 3 ' Q4 V al d 0q O � � C'1 01 ro " n x iD StD 3 w o v o m A S 3m r N 3 w O • n 2 S p 2 . S 7 _ N c 0 A N Dp n 0 0 0 Tons 0 b" g 0 0 0 0 N I.- N O Q N C o � O Vt N 0q No � CA 3 rt 0 0000 CD N N O 8888888�� Population ■ =s (DD ■ (D LA o�ao �-0 o rD (D N Q rN '* O (p O O Q (r -D 3 C x- D- ' * 3fD (D v 3, o' 3 cu o�01 > D ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ c n o o� v M n v N c c Q n 3 0 vWi Q m 0 Q r••h < Qq rt N N N {y (D c O p N CFcx a r L O (D =. CU N O H N N rr+ v %n p' CL < n� m — (D =. — r* K■ 0� .■ Q DCL ■ n n w D v �' C 3 C o =r :;o o 2. o m a Q '^ c v o Q' n �< c as o n, (' a' (DD N r r 3n (�D (D -n '�' O r+�• O .< aq' �. 3 "O �. cx < (D (D N r�r O O*q (D v cxC O n rT W' 3 h ' v (D N (D C3 cu � 0'O � a '* O (p O O Q (r -D 3 C x- D- ' * 3fD (D v 3, o' 3 cu o�01 > D ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ c n o o� v M n v N c c Q n 3 0 vWi Q m 0 Q r••h < Qq rt N N N {y (D c O p N CFcx a r L O (D =. CU N O H N N rr+ v %n p' CL < n� m — (D =. — r* 2 2 m m n n w D v �' C 3 C o =r N o 2. o m a rt c v rte- (D � 0 (DD N r r O (�D m� X -n '�' O O .< < (D (D N r�r O Q (D O n rT h ' cu< (D C3 rt '* O (p O O Q (r -D 3 C x- D- ' * 3fD (D v 3, o' 3 cu o�01 > D ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ c n o o� v M n v N c c Q n 3 0 vWi Q m 0 Q r••h < Qq rt N N N {y (D c O p N CFcx a r L O (D =. CU N O H N N rr+ v %n p' CL < n� m — (D =. — r* rD rt D M N �1 N z c� G v N c o :' N < f) _0 F' (TD N 7 C 3 C — N rD rt D M N �1 N z c� G i q. 441 C N n m N Ln 0 n• s= T m p � N n n D -n 0- N O o — D� o m O T ` O r) � G N Ln ry M. v D ... = 0 (D rnr < v O (D aq N W N N C cr C 7 a' rr rt N 0 Q' C o R N Q O (D O r+ (D N (DD sv r -r Q 3 -11 co z� 1 r) to O O a) a0i (D -� 7� —Ln _ Q nQQO. 3: r e-+ 05 Q N' — '� O_ -zn 3 cr (D O = AW fD (D (D C- (D S O. (D VI O O N 0 c O sv o (D (D Q N O n n N CD (D N }3 V 3 .0 I (D 3 s lD i q. 441 C N n m N Ln ;o n• s= T < � N n -n 0- p O v n ry ... (D rnr < v O (D aq W N rD N Q V a' rr rt z v o R N (D N O (D rt ;o rmm 0O z� O O O a) a0i H -� 7� —Ln Q 3 nQQO. z Yn (D O_ -zn 3 cr )ORE s (D k (D S O. (D fD� N c O sv o (D Q G }3 V I i q. 441 ■ WO ° n -I hQ rt r+ te-F `H =r e -+(D (D D � 0 D 0 (D O = O C (7 rr O h W ` 3 D 0 r °q 3 =3 -� ,-+ O 3 Q DQ ° -nO n, 3 rD nni rr . x O N n O lD fD(D (D � O O (D a- % O (D W N C N _ aq (D N (DD i L 00 Q n (D (D rr r 3 0 a� (D N O Q N (D (D N cu O O O O ,' 6 o c c Q z o T ° N n N c Q -F NC Q' O r N , + n� FU " p r) �. W N � n N-� D (D :;o�' � N � n as G(�D o r+ N D N rn 4 < ;:pO O� N (D r+ rD C O i (D (D O N p Q- Q N O a• T n r-�, N ° � r) O n N Q O O 3 0 00 Q ,Or (p _0 O ° N � N v frt (D O N �. (D Q CL WO ° n -I hQ rt r+ te-F `H =r e -+(D (D D � 0 D 0 (D O = O C (7 rr O h W ` 3 D 0 r °q 3 =3 -� ,-+ O 3 Q DQ ° -nO n, 3 rD nni rr . x O N n O lD fD(D (D � O O (D a- % O (D W N C N _ aq (D N (DD i L 00 Q n (D (D rr r 3 0 a� (D N O Q N (D (D N cu O O O O ,' 6 o c c Q �cu � N N N c Q -F =3 3 Q' N r N (D (D FU W N � � N � Q r-+ N N O O N O ƒ _ ? 7 U 2 2 0 / y_ (D Ln L � \ _ �_ 0 k B / ? � Oro m ° � 9 n o § 2 � n 2 % n o_ E _ / m / ƒ ? § � \ & § \ n<< k z N 7? 7 � ® ƒ 2 I _ k / \ k 0 ° 0 Ln � o 7 G § 0 L CL o 7 o \ /. Ln | � � J � C ( 2 B i I a ƒ§2 � o- k 0 7 R U g 3 ƒ k n 2 % n o_ �< � o ° Q 3 / )' 3 ? 2 ] J r r � k o UJ 0 | � J mC: c« n z ? q / 7 0 o g 2 /� 7 n § W 7) Q� o f 6' v 3 � c � §. _ / 9 < \ 0) 'n G = m � � (D §' c U 2 (DO a) 2 2 _. (D \. ƒ =rj m r / q = / CL) > : � k / � E r+ § 7 k .t � � � � a a � r) UZ to v,• (TQ a. Cl a cl)o��;o B (A cn Itn 00N H N � N � N � 00 C1 0 O Rq m m v v (D fu CL m . m O o x o m co 13) (� v T n :;l -v V) 3 3 (n n o Q S 0 c (D _ \ 7 o D' 0 fD c 7 r '� C v w (D c- rDD N Q 0 ..S .p () Q r3+ N rD -�' gyp' a, O 2 C7 3 7 T < �D N 7 r* ? 0o LA (D S C' � r+ �- �p -n (D O y N x CD CL rte+ Ln N 7 r+ a y �• - N C '+ (DCU a� OQ YJ 3 c"n C :3 N 'CC� 00 Q Q N (D C G (D < (D (D. H (Q T C r+ i m O O nu O m N O C A m N M; PC (D cr (D I n (D O- C r -r O rr 3. ri QL C+ 0 Q Q D� O. O v N r-+ (D c - C: n O TI N n fD N O N N N O N N O fD r+ (D (D X N_ O� 0 r+ rD O i N (D (D n n V) O N rt (D O N n' e+ N r+ (D n O 3 3 fD 0 - LA e --h S v r -h N co O fD A O (D m CL fu rF O�