HomeMy WebLinkAbout10/19/2021 (2)OR1�%
COMMISSIONERS
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY FLORIDA
COMMISSION AGENDA
TUESDAY, OCTOBER 19,2021 - 9:00 AM
Commission Chambers
Indian River County Administration Complex
180127th Street, Building A
Vero Beach, Florida, 32960-3388
www.ircgov.com
COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
Chairman, Joseph E. Flescher, District 2 Jason E. Brown, County Administrator
Vice Chairman, Peter D. O'Bryan, District 4 Dylan Reingold, County Attorney
Commissioner Susan Adams, District 1 Jeffrey R Smith, Clerk of the Circuit Court and Comptroller
Commissioner Joseph H. Earman, District 3
Commissioner Laura Moss, District 5
This meeting can be attended virtually via Zoom. Instructions can be found at the
end of this agenda and also online at www.ircgov.com.
1. CALL TO ORDER
2.A. A MOMENT OF SILENT REFLECTION FOR FIRST RESPONDERS AND MEMBERS
OF THE ARMED FORCES
2.B. INVOCATION
Pastor Tracy Moore, Vero Beach Church of Christ
3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Dylan Reingold, County Attorney
4. ADDITIONS/DELETIONS TO THE AGENDA / EMERGENCY ITEMS
5. PROCLAMATIONS and PRESENTATIONS
S.A. Presentation of Proclamation Honoring the 2021-2022 Indian River County Fire
Rescue Lieutenant, Engineer and Firemedic of the Year.
Attachments: Proclamation
6. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
7. INFORMATION ITEMS FROM STAFF OR COMMISSIONERS NOT REQUIRING
BOARD ACTION
October 19, 2021 Pape 1 of 5
7.A. Proclamation Honoring Debra P. Stewart on Her Retirement From Indian River
County Board of County Commissioners Department of Utility Services / Water
Division with Eighteen Years of Service
Attachments: Proclamation
7.B. Sebastian River Improvement District Fiscal Year 2021/2022 Regular Board
Meeting Schedule
Attachments: Sebastian River Improvement District 2021-2022
7.C. Proof of Publication of Unclaimed Monies for Cash Bonds Deposited with the
Clerk of the Circuit Court prior to January 1, 2020 is on file in the Office of the
Clerk to the Board.
7.D. Economic Development Council Replacement
Attachments: Staff Report
211007 Email Notification re Resignation of James Funk
8. CONSENT AGENDA
8.A. Revised Schedule of Board of County Commission 2022 Meeting Dates
Attachments: Staff Report Revised Schedule
Meeting Dates 2022 Draft
8.B. Project: Lakes at Waterway Village PD - Pod U - Request for 2 -Year Extension to
Final Lift of Asphalt Contract - Developer: DIVOSTA HOMES, L.P., a Delaware
limited partnership
Attachments: Staff Report
Letter Requesting Extension
Modification to Contract
8.C. Approval of Grant and Match Funding for Library RFPs 2021028 (Network
Infrastructure Equipment and Installation) and 2021029 (Cabling, Hardware and
Installation)
Attachments: Staff Report
8.D. Miscellaneous Budget Amendment 011
Attachments: Staff Report
Resolution
Exhibit "A"
October 19, 2021 Page 2 of 5
8.E. FDOT Transportation Regional Incentive Program (TRIP) Supplemental Agreement
No. 3 for 66th Avenue Roadway Widening (49th Street to 69th Street) FM No.
436379-1-54-01;436379-1-54-02 (IRC -1505)
Attachments: Staff Report
Authorizing Resolution
FDOT TRIP Supplemental Agreement No. 3
8.F. Amendment No. 1 - FDEP Grant Agreement No. 191R2 (Indian River County
Hurricane Irma Recovery Project (Sector 7 Beach and Dune Restoration))
Attachments: Staff Report
Amendment No. 1 to FDEP Grant Agreement 191R2
8.G. Award of Bid No: 2022009 Jackie Robinson Training Complex Villas Remodel
IRC -1914A
Attachments: Staff Report
Sample Agreement
9. CONSTITUTIONAL OFFICERS and GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES
10. PUBLIC ITEMS
A. PUBLIC HEARINGS
10.A.1. Public Hearing and Discussion of 2021 Redistricting of County Commissioner
Districts
Attachments: Staff Report
Proposed Map 1
Proposed Map 2
Proposed Map 3
B. PUBLIC DISCUSSION ITEMS
10.13.1. Request to Speak from Elizab--th Siebert re: Redistricting
Attachments: Public Discussion Request Siebert
C. PUBLIC NOTICE ITEMS
11. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR MATTERS
12. DEPARTMENTAL MATTERS
A. Community Development
B. Emergency Services
C. General Services
D. Human Resources
October 19, 2021 Page 3 of 5
E. Information Technology
F. Office of Management and Budget
G. Public Works
H. Utilities Services
12.H.1. Finished Water Quality Audit ?resentation from Kimley-Horn and Associates
Attachments: Staff Report
Finished Water Quality Audit Report
13. COUNTY ATTORNEY MATTERS
14. COMMISSIONERS MATTERS
A. Commissioner Joseph E. Flescher, Chairman
14.A.1. Chapter 164 Mediation Update, October, 2021
Attachments: Commissioner's Memo
B. Commissioner Peter D. O'Bryan, Vice Chairman
14.B.1. Request the Board consider directing the County Attorney to start the process
to establish a Municipal Services Benefit Unit (MSBU) for the Oslo Park area
to raise funds for future road paving projects
Attachments: Commissioner's Memorandum
14.B.2. Request the Board consider naming the Wabasso Scrub Conservation Area
Overlook for Joe Carroll
Attachments: Commissioner's Memorandum
Attachment - Resolution 2011-042
C. Commissioner Susan Adams
D. Commissioner Joseph H. Earman
E. Commissioner Laura Moss
15. SPECIAL DISTRICTS AND BOARDS
A. Emergency Services District
B. Solid Waste Disposal District
15.B.1. Work Order No. 45 to Kimley Horn and Associates for Landfill Automated
Scale System
Attachments: Staff Report
Work Order No 45 - KHA
C. Environmental Control Board
October 19, 2021 Page 4 of 5
15.C.1. Approval of Minutes Meeting March 12, 2019
15.C.2. Appointment of Environmental Control Officer
Attachments: Staff Report
Letter of Recommendation
Resume J. Price 2021
85-427 Environmental Control Board
16. ADJOURNMENT
Except for those matters specifically exempted under the State Statute and Local Ordinance, the Board shall
provide an opportunity for public comment prior to the undertaking by the Board of any action on the agenda,
including those matters on the Consent Agenda. Public comment shall also be heard on any proposition which
the Board is to take action which was either not on the Board agenda or distributed to the public prior to the
commencement of the meeting.
Anyone who may wish to appeal any decision which may be made at this meeting will need to ensure that a
verbatim record of the proceedings is made which includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal
will be based.
Anyone who needs a special accommodation for this meeting may contact the County's Americans with
Disabilities Act (ADA) Coordinator at (772) 226-1223 at least 48 hours in advance of meeting.
Anyone who needs special accommodation with a hearing aid for this meeting may contact the Board of
County Commission Office at 772-226-1490 at least 20 hours in advance of the meeting.
The full agenda is available on line at the Indian River County Website at www.ircgov.com The full agenda is
also available for review in the Board of County Commission Office, the Indian River County Main Library,
and the North County Library.
Commission Meetings are broadcast live on Comcast Cable Channel 27
Rebroadcasts continuously with the following proposed schedule:
Tuesday at 6.00p.m. until Wednesday at 6:00 a.m.,
Wednesday at 9:00 a.m. until 5:00 p.m.,
Thursday at 1:00 p.m. through Friday Morning,
and Saturday at 12:00 Noon to 5:00 p.m.
October 19, 2021
Pale 5 of 5
Y4
PR O CLAMA TION
Honoring the 2021-2022 Indian River County Fire Rescue
Lieutenant, Engineer and Firemedic of the Year
WHEREAS, on December 17, 1923, local volunteers established the first fire
department in Indian River County; and
WHEREAS, over the course of the past century, the department transitioned from
volunteer to career personnel; from a department crewed solely by trained Firefighters
to today's crews who are dual certified in firefighting and emergency medical response
as well as being trained in a multitude of specialized disaster response scenarios on
both land and sea; and
WHEREAS, this year, the leadership of Indian River County Fire Rescue is
reinstituting the long-standing tradition of annually recognizing those among their
ranks who perform their duties in a manner that: exemplifies a competency reflecting
the highest of standards, supports fellow Firemedics in achieving their goals; supports
the department's policies and regularly demonstrates the ability to lead or follow based
upon the existing circumstances, and
WHEREAS, Indian River County Fire Rescue is proud to announce the award
recipients for 2021-2022:
Firemedic of the Year, Donald Burke,
Engineer of the Year, Stephen Flood; and
Lieutenant of the Year, Carlo Marques.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT PROCLAIMED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that the Board
supports the efforts of our Fire Rescue Department to publicly commend those
members whose dedication, loyalty, productivity and professionalism have been
recognized by their co-workers.
BE IT FURTHER PROCLAIMED that the Board of County Commissioners
is grateful to all of our Indian River County first responders and the valuable services
they provide to the residents of our community.
Adopted this 19th Day of October 2021.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
INDIANRIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
Joseph E. Flescher, Chairman
1
-1A
PROCLAMATION
HONORING DEBRA P. STEWAR T ON HER RETIREMENT FROM THE
INDIAN RIVER CO UVTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
DEPARTMENT OF UTILITY SER VICES, WATER DIVISION
WHEREAS, Debra P. Stewart retires from the Indian River County Water Division
effective October 30, 2021; and
WHEREAS, Debra P. Stewart began her career with Indian River County on June 30,
2003, as a Water/Wastewater Plant Operator A in Water Distribution, where she
continued in that capacity until her retirement; and
WHEREAS, Debra P. Stewart has served this County and the Public with distinction
and selflessness. During her 18 years of service, she was dedicated, and her work was
greatly appreciated by the employer, citizens, and co-workers alike, and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT PROCLAIMED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that the Board
applauds Debra P. Stewart's efforts on behalf of the County, and the Board wishes to
express their appreciation for the dedicated service she has given to Indian River
Countyfor the last 18 years; and
BE IT FURTHER PROCLAIMED that the Board of County Commissioners and staff
extend heartfelt wishes for success in her future endeavors!
Adopted this 19th day of October, 2021.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
INDIANRIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
Joseph E. Flescher, Chairman
2
-713
SEBASTIAN RIVER IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT
c/o Special District Services, Inc.
2501 Burns Road, Suite A
Palm Beach Gardens, Florida 33410
(561) 6304922
Fax:. (561) 630-4923
September 27, 2021
VIA CERTIFIED MAIL — RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Clerk of the Circuit Court
Indian River County
P.O. Box 1028
Vero Beach, FL 32961-1028
Re: Sebastian River ImproN ement District
To Whom It May Concern:
Pursuant to Florida law, enclosed please find a copy of the Fiscal Year 2021/2022 Regular
Meeting Schedule for Sebastian River Improvement District, as will be published.
If you have any questions and/or comments, please do not hesitate to contact our office.
Sincerely,
SPECIAL DISTRICT SERVICES, INC.
Laura J. Arc er
Enclosure
K,
SEBASTIAN RIVER IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT
FISCAL YEAR 2021/2022 REGULAR BOARD MEETING SCHEDULE
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Sebastian River Improvement District ("SAID") will
hold Regular Board Meetings of the Board of Supervisors at the Indian River County
Administration Complex, Building B-1, Room 501, 1800 2711 Street, Vero Beach, Florida
32960 at 10:00 a.m. (**unless otherwise noted**) on the following dates:
October 6, 2021
November 3, 2021
December 1, 2021
January 5, 2022
February 2, 2022
-March 2,-202-2
April 6, 2022
May 4, 2022
**June 1, 2022**
July 6, 2022
August 3, 2022
September 7, 2022
**The June 1, 2022, Regular Board Meering will be held at the Indian River County
Administration Complex, Building B-1, Room 501, 1800 271i Street, Vero Beach, Florida 32960
and will commence at 9:00 a.m. The Annual Meeting will immediately follow the Regular
Board Meeting at 10:00 a.m. at the same location.**
The purpose of the meetings is to conduct any business which may properly come before the
Board. The meetings are open to the public and will be conducted in accordance with the
provisions of Florida law. Copies of the Agenda for any of the meetings may be obtained from
the District's website or by contacting the District Manager at (561) 630-4922 and/or toll free at
1-877-737-4922.
From time to time one or two Supervisors may participate by telephone; therefore, a speaker
telephone will be present as required, at the meeting location so that Supervisors may be fully
informed of the discussions taking place. Said meetings) may be continued -as -found necessary
to a time and place specified on the record.
If any person decides to appeal any decision made with respect to any matter considered at these
meetings, such person will need a record of the proceedings and such person may need to insure
that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made at his or her own expense and which record
includes the testimony and evidence on which the appeal is based.
In accordance with the provisions of the Americans with Disabilities Act, any person requiring
special accommodations or an interpreter to participate at any of these meetings should contact
the District Manager at (561) 630-4922 and/or toll free at 1-877-737-4922 at least seven (7) days
prior to the date of the particular meeting.
C]
Meetings may be cancelled from time to time without advertised notice.
SEBASTIAN RIVER IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT
www.sebastianriverid.org
PUBLISH: INDIAN RIVER PRESS JOURNAL 00/0012021
E
dile 40 No, a/-ogGG
/o/Cf 1A0.;?1 Ajer�
SEBASTIAN RIVER IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT
c/o Special District Services, Inc.
2501 Burns Road, Suite A
Palm Beach Gardens, Florida 33410
(561) 630-4922
Fax: (561) 630-4923
September 27, 2021
VIA CERTIFIED MAIL — RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Clerk of the Circuit Court
Indian River County
P.O. Box 1028
Vero Beach, FL 32961-1028
Re: Sebastian River Improvement District
To Whom It May Concern:
Pursuant to Florida law, enclosed please find a copy of the Fiscal Year 2021/2022 Regular
Meeting Schedule for Sebastian River Improvement District, as will be published.
If you have any questions and/or comments, please do not hesitate to contact our office.
Sincerely,
SPECIAL DISTRICT SERVICES, INC.
Laura J. Arc er
Enclosure
SEBASTIAN RIVER IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT
FISCAL YEAR 2021/2022 REGULAR BOARD MEETING SCHEDULE
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Sebastian River Improvement District ("SRID") will
hold Regular Board Meetings of the Board of Supervisors at the Indian River County
Administration Complex, Building B-1, Room 501, 1800 27h Street, Vero Beach, Florida
32960 at 10:00 a.m. (**unless otherwise noted**) on the following dates:
October 6, 2021
November 3, 2021
December 1, 2021
January 5, 2022
February 2, 2022
March 2, 2022
April 6, 2022
May 4, 2022
**June 1, 2022**
July 6, 2022
August 3, 2022
September 7, 2022
**The June 1, 2022, Regular Board Meeting will be held at the Indian River County
Administration Complex, Building B-1, Room 501, 1800 27th Street, Vero Beach, Florida 32960
and will commence at 9:00 a.m. The Annual Meeting will immediately follow the Regular
Board Meeting at 10:00 a.m. at the same location.**
The purpose of the meetings is to conduct any business which may properly come before the
Board. The meetings are open to the public and will be conducted in accordance with the
provisions of Florida law. Copies of the Agenda for any of the meetings may be obtained from
the District's website or by contacting the District Manager at (561) 630-4922 and/or toll free at
1-877-737-4922.
From time to time one or two Supervisors may participate by telephone; therefore, a speaker
telephone will be present as required, at the meeting location so that Supervisors may be fully
informed of the discussions taking place. Said meeting(s) may be continued as found necessary
to a time and place specified on the record.
If any person decides to appeal any decision made with respect to any matter considered at these
meetings, such person will need a record of the proceedings and such person may need to insure
that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made at his or her own expense and which record
includes the testimony and evidence on which the appeal is based.
In accordance with the provisions of the Americans with Disabilities Act, any person requiring
special accommodations or an interpreter to participate at any of these meetings should contact
the District Manager at (561) 630-4922 and/or toll free at 1-877-737-4922 at least seven (7) days
prior to the date of the particular meeting.
Meetings may be cancelled from time to time without advertised notice.
SEBASTIAN RIVER IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT
www.sebastianriverid.org
PUBLISH: INDIAN RIVER PRESS JOURNAL 00/00/2021
Treasure Com Newspapers
PART OF THE USA TODAY NETWORK
Indian River Press Journal
1801 U.S. 1, Vero Beach, FL 32960
AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION
IRC CLERK OF THE CIR CUIT COURT
PO BOX 1028
NOTICE OF
VERO BEACH, FL 32961-1028
UNCLAIMED MONEYS
Unclaimed moneys for Cash
STATE OF WISCONSIN
Bonds, Garnishment Surplus,
Non Resident Cost Bonds,
COUNTY OF BROWN
Small Claims Garnishments,
Small Claims Non Resident
Cost Bonds deposited with the
Before the undersigned authority personally appeared, said
Clerk of the Circuit Court,
legal clerk, who on oath says that he/she is a legal clerk of the
prior to January 1, 2020, for
the followingdefendants will
Indian River Press Journal, a daily newspaper published at Vero
be forfeited to the Indian
Beach in Indian River County, Florida: that the attached copy of
River County Clerk of Court
unless claimed by the deposi-
advertisement was published in the Indian River Press Journal
for of the cash bond by Sep -
in the following issues below. Affiant further says that the said
tember 1, 2021:
Unclaimed moneys for Juror
Indian River Press Journal is a newspaper published in Vero
Checks issued in the year
Beach in said Indian River County, Florida, and that said
2019.
For a listing of defendants
newspaper has heretofore been continuously published in said
and for information to claim
Indian River County, Florida, daily and distributed in Indian River
the balance, please visit our
website at www.clerk.indian-r
County, Florida, for a period of one year next preceding the first
iver.org
publication of the attached copy of advertisement; and affiant
Click on the "Unclaimed
Monies" on the left side of
further says that she has neither paid or promised any person,
the screen.
firm or corporation any discount, rebate, commission or refund
click on the"Unclaimed
for the purpose of securing this advertisement fcr publication in
Bonds" in the blue bar on the
top of the page.
the said newspaper. The Indian River Press Journal has been
Click on the "2019 Outstand-
ing Juror Checks" in the blue
entered as Periodical Matter at the Post Offices in Vero Beach,
bar on the top of the page
Indian River County, Florida and has been for a period of one
Pub: July 12, 2021
year next preceding the first publication of the attached copy of
TCN4812436
advertisement.
07/12/2021
Subscribed and 4n to before on July 12, 2021:
0__A_0__ (Y 1. "N d1 rx_.wv
Notary, State of WI, County of Brown
TARA IVIONDLOCH
Notary Public
States of VViscorisin
My commission expires August 6, 2021
Publication Cost: $59.85
Ad No: 0004812436
Customer No: 1309493
PO #:
# of Affidavits 1
Dylan Reingold, County Attorney
William K. DeBraal, Deputy County Attorney
Susan J. Prado, Assistant County Attorney
7b
Informational Matters - B.C.C. 10. 19.21
Of ce of
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
MEMORANDUM
TO: Board of County Commissioners
FROM: Dylan Reingold, County Attorney
DATE: October 11, 2021
SUBJECT: Economic Development Council Replacement
ATTORNEY
On October 7, 2021, an email was sent from Kathy Flynn of Piper Aircraft notifying the County that James
Funk was no longer the Local Manufacturing Industry representative for the above committee and was
replaced with Danny Markford for the position. Danny Markford will fulfill the remaining term of James
Funk, which expires in January, 2023.
ATTACHMENT(S).
• October 7, 2021 — Email to IRC
DR: cm
C: I Users VegistarWppData lLocahTempIBCL Techno1ogies1easyPDF 81 @BCL@FCi 24B6B1@BCL@FC124B6B.docx
From: Flynn, Kathy L. <Kathy.Flynn@piper.com>
Sent: Thursday, October 07, 20219:27 AM
To: Maura Stokes <mstokes@ircgov.com>
Subject: Danny Markford replaces James Funk.... RE: EDC - IRC Economic Development Council
CAUTION: This message is from an external source. Please use caution when opening attachments or clicking links.
Hello Maura,
Please add Danny Markford, Chief Financial Officer, to replace James Funk.
Danny.markford@piper.com
PH: 772-299-2210
Don't hesitate to call me with any questions.
Thank you,
Kathy Flynn
PH: 772-299-2502
. A&
Pil5ere
Kathy Flynn I
Executive Assistant
kathy.flyn n@ pi per.com
www.piper.com
P:772-299-2502
Piper Aircraft, Inc.,
2926 Piper Drive, Vero
Beach, FL 32960
This email is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. It may contain information that is
attorney client privileged, confidential, and/or proprietary. If you have received this email in error, please (1) do not use
this information in any way; (2) notify the sender by reply e-mail; (3) and immediately delete this message and any of its
attachments.
MM/
�V Eft
o` °oma Office of the
z INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
* * ADMINISTRATOR
Jason E. Brown, County Administrator
Michael C. Zito, Assistant County Administrator
MEMORANDUM
TO: Members of the Board
of County Commissioners
FROM: Jason E. Brown
County Administrator
DATE: October 12, 2021
SUBJECT: Revised Schedule of Board of County Commission 2022 Meeting Dates
Background
It is necessary to add a meeting to the previously approved Schedule of Board of County Commission
2022 Meeting Dates, on November 22, 2022.
Per section 100.041, Florida Statutes, commission terms commence on the second Tuesday following
the election. Since the 2022 election is not until November 8d', the commission term would begin on
November 22nd. Also, pursuant to section 101.02 of the Indian River County Code of Ordinances, the
annual election of the chair and vice -chair is to occur on the third Tuesday following the first Monday
in November. Since, the first Monday is not until November 7d', the annual election will also be on
November 22nd
Funding
There are no funding considerations with this item.
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends that the Board approve the revised 2022 BCC meeting schedule.
January 11, 2022
January 18, 2022
February 1, 2022
February 8, 2022
February 15, 2022
March 1, 2022
March 8, 2022
March 15, 2022
April 5, 2022
April 12, 2022
April 19, 2022
May 3, 2022
May 10, 2022
May 17, 2022
June 7, 2022
June 14, 2022
June 21, 2022
July 5, 2022
July 12, 2022
August 16, 2022
September 13, 2022
September 20, 2022
October 4, 2022
October 11, 2022
October 18, 2022
November 1, 2022
November 8, 2022
November 15, 2022
November 22, 2022
December 6, 2022
December 13, 2022
December 20, 2022
CONSENT: October 19, 2021
Cif ce of
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
Dylan Reingold, County Attorney
William K. DeBraal, Deputy County Attorney
Susan J. Prado, Assistant County Attorney
MEMORANDUM
TO: The Board of County Commissioners
FROM: William K. DeBraal - Deputy County Attorney
DATE: October 7, 2021
ATTORNEY
SUBJECT: Project: Lakes at Waterway Village PD — Pod U
Request for 2 -Year Extension to Final Lift of Asphalt Contract
Developer: DIVOSTA HOMES, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership
In December 2019, DIVOSTA HOMES, L.P., the developer of Lakes at Waterway Village PD
— Pod U, entered into a Contract for Construction for Final Lift of Asphalt, Contract No. PD -
16 -12 -07 -FLA (2004010124-83766), pos=ed the required security in the form of Wells Fargo
Bank, N.A. Irrevocable Standby Letter of Credit in the amount of $41,165.00, to guarantee
completion of the final. lift of asphalt. The developer, has requested an extension to this
contract as the project has not yet been completed.
Section 913.10(1)(E) of the County Code states that for good cause shown the Board may in
its discretion grant one or more extensions of time for performance of any contract for
construction of required improvements provided the security supporting such contract remains
valid for the required period following the newly extended time for performance.
Staff has no objection to a 2 -year extension. Additionally, the developer has paid the required
$660 extension request fee; and has provided its engineer's updated certified cost estimate,
which County engineering has approved. It is noted that the approved amount has changed
from the approved initial cost estimate which would necessitate an amendment to the existing
letter of credit to increase the amount and the letter of credit expiration date.
FUNDING:
There is no cost to be borne by Indian River County with respect to this item.
10
RECOMMENDATION:
Approve the Modification to Contract for Construction for Final Lift of Asphalt, Contract No.
PD -16 -12 -07 -FLA (2004010124-83766) to extend the completion date to November 27, 2023,
and authorize the Chairman to execute same. It is also noted that the Developer will need to
have the supporting letter of credit amended no later than November 27, 2021 to increase the
amount and extend the letter of credit expiration date.
nw
attachments: Letter Request for Extension
Modification to Contract
II
September 15, 2021
William Debraal
Indian River County
1801 27th Street
Vero Beach, FL 32960
(772) 473-0666
RE: Lakes at Waterway Village- Pod U
Final Lift Extension
Dear Mr. Debraal,
SEP ? 9 2021
Please accept this request for extending the final lift of asphalt requirement date at the subject -
referenced project Currently, there are +1-15 homes that have not started construction, and
approximately 15 that are still under construction. In order to protect the final lift from the remaining
heavy construction activities, we would like to delay the installation of final lift until the construction of
these homes is complete.
Please feel free to contact me at (77 2) 794-4117 or kinan.husainy@kimley-horn.com with any
questions or concerns you might have. or should you require additional information.
Sincerely,
r
Kinan Husainy, P.E.
Associate
772 794 410C
Lakes at Waterway Village PD — Poc U
MODIFICATION TO
CONTRACT FOR CONSTRUCTION FOR FINAL LIFT OF ASPHALT
CONTRACT NO. PD -16 -12 -07 -FLA (2004010124-83766)
THIS MODIFICATION, made and entered into this day of October, 2021,
by and between DIVOSTA HOMES, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership, hereinafter
referred to as "Developer", and INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, a political subdivision of
the State of Florida, by and through its Board of County Commissioners,
hereinafter referred to as "County".
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, Developer entered into a Contract for Construction for Final Lift of
Asphalt, Contract No. PD -16 -12 -07 -FLA (2004010124-83766) guaranteeing the
installation of the final lift of asphalt the earlier of 2 years from the project's Certificate of
Completion (November 27, 2019) or 60 days prior to turnover to homeowner
association or prior to certificate of occupancy for the last residence in this phase of the
subdivision; and the Developer posted letter of credit in the amount of $41,165.00 as
security to guarantee completion; and
WHEREAS, the developer has
requested an additional 2 -year extension to November 27, 2023 to install
the final lift of asphalt, as allowed by code;
2. provided an updated certified cost estimate attached as Exhibit "A" which
amount has been approved by County engineering and did change from
the initial cost estimate;
3. increased the initial cost estimate of $41,165.00 to $59,848.95; and
4. paid the required $660.00 extension fee request to County.
NOW, THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION OF THE MUTUAL COVENANTS
AND PROMISES HEREIN CONTAINED, the parties agree as follows:
The date for completion o= the final lift of asphalt as outlined in the Contract for
Construction for Final Lift of Asphalt, Contract No PD -16 -12 -07 -FLA
(2004010124-83766) is extended to November 27, 2023.
2. The developer's engineer's updated certified cost estimate as approved by
County engineering, attached as Exhibit "A" represents 125% of the updated
cost of the final lift of asphalt to be completed.
13
3. Prior to November 27, 2021, the $41,165.00 Wells Fargo Bank N.A. Irrevocable
Standby Letter of Credit No. IS000108534U is required to be amended (1) to
increase the amount to $59,848.95, (2) to extend its final expiration to February
27, 2023, and (3) to reference t -ie Contract for Construction for Final Lift of
Asphalt as being modified, othenNise this Modification is null and void.
4. The extension fee in the amount of $660.00 established by Resolution No. 2005-
041 and pursuant to Section 913.10(1)(G) of the Indian River County Code has
been paid.
5. All other terms set out in the Contract for Construction for Final Lift of Asphalt,
Contract No. PD -16 -12 -07 -FLA (2004010124-83766) remain in full force and
effect.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have set their hands and seals on
the day and year first above written.
DIVOSTA HOMES, L.P., a Delaware limited
partnership
By DIVOSTA HOMES HOLDINGS, LLC, a
Delaware limited liability company, its
General Partner
Developer
By:
Print Name:
Title:
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
by and through its Board of County
Commissioners
ATTEST: Jeffrey R. Smith, Clerk
of Court and Comptroller By:
Joseph E. Flescher, Chairman
Deputy Clerk BCC approved:
Approved as to form
and legal��ss�ufficie . y:
By: i�^^"
CA14�1
William K. De raal
Deputy County Attorney
2
14
Lakes at Waterway Village Plat Pod U
FINAL LIFT BOND - OPC
9/15/2021
PAVING
DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT
UNIT COST
TOTAL
1" ASPHALT (FINAL COURSE) - Pods -S- F 14 3,822 1 Sy 1$
9.78
$
37,379.15
SIGNING AND STRIPING 1 LS
$ 2,500.00
$
2,500.00
SET PRM -5, PCP'S, LOT CORNERS 1 I LS
$ 8,000.00
$
8,000.00
TOTAL
$
47,879.16
TOTALS $ 47,879.15
PROPOSED BOND AMOUNT (125%) $ 59,848.95
Kimley Horn and
' ticEn; ' /yCi IRCENGINEERING
DIVISJON
No. 7548 s Accepted E1 y
— a Z Insufficient -- -.-
Kinan Husai PT--
FL Reg #75�
TSTgT F
/ NA
l/,iL E
The Engineer has no control over the cost of labor, materials, equipment, or over the Contractor's methods of determining prices or over competitive
bidding or market conditions. Opinions of probable costs provided herein are based on the information known to Engineer at this time and represent only
the Engineer's judgment as a design professional familiar with the construction industry. The Engineer cannot and does not guarantee that proposals,
bids, or actual construction costs will not vary from its opinions of probable costs.
15
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET
PURCHASING DIVISION
DATE: October 5, 2021
TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
THROUGH: Jason E. Brown, County Administrator
Kristin Daniels, Director, Office of Management and Budget
FROM: Jennifer Hyde, Purchasing Manager
SUBJECT: Approval of Grant and Match Funding for Library RFPs 2021028 (Network
Infrastructure Equipment and Installation) and 2021029 (Cabling, Hardware
and Installation)
BACKGROUND:
On March 16, 2021, the Board awarded RFPs 2021028 and 2021029 to provide improvements to
library telecommunications, interne. access and internal connections. These improvements were
proposed to be primarily funded through grants from the Federal Communication Commission
("FCC"), which is administered by the Universal Service Administrative Company ("USAC") under
the program named E -rate. The proposed improvements include modernization of the
wired/wireless network infrastructure and firewalls for all County Libraries, and the ability to
support remote video conferencing by both patrons and staff.
FUNDING:
As authorized by the Board, Janie Griffith Consulting submitted funding applications on the
County's behalf for the separate infrastructure and cabling portions of the work to USAC, prior to
the program's March 25, 2021 deadline.
For the infrastructure portion, staff asked the consultant to include four additional transceivers in
the funding request, at an additional cost of $2,181.20.
As anticipated, funding in the amount of 80% was awarded by the USAC, however one specific
item (warranty) was declared ineligible for the grant, leaving the entire $2,240.25 cost for that
item on the County's share.
Project totals for the infrastructure portion of the work, including final cost, the amount that will
be paid to the contractor directly by USAC, and the balance of the cost to be paid by the County by
purchase order are illustrated on the table on the next page.
16
Infrastructure — PC Solutions &
Integration, Inc.
Total cost
E -rate program County's
funding share
Original proposal/estimated breakout
$291,066.91
$232,853.53 $58,213.38
Plus Additional Transceivers
+$2,181.20
Original proposal presented to Board
Total project cost (Infrastructure)
$293,248.11
$5,685.60
Less warranty
-2,240.25
$34,390.40
Program Eligible Cost
$291,007.86
$232,806.29 $58,201.57
Plus warranty cost
+$2,240.25
$60,441.82
The funding for the cabling portion of the work was also approved by the USAC at 80%, as
anticipated, however the $14,560 cost for installation was inadvertently omitted from the original
cost estimate provided to the Board. Payment for the bulk of the work will be paid directly to the
contractor by USAC, with the remainder via purchase order.
Cabling —Bazon-Cox &Associates, Inc.
Total cost
E -rate program
County's
County'sfunding share
PC Solutions & Integration, Inc.
funding
share
Original proposal presented to Board
$28,428.00
$22,742.40
$5,685.60
Total project cost and approved distribution
$42,988.00
$34,390.40
$8,597.60
The total project breakout is shown below. The overall County cost share for the program is
$5,140.44 more than originally suggested at the March 16, 2021 meeting.
Vendor
Project portion
Total cost
E -rate program
County'sfunding share
PC Solutions & Integration, Inc.
Infrastructure
$293,248.11
$232,806.29
$60,441.82
Bazon-Cox & Associates, Inc.
Cabling
$42,988.00
$34,390.40
$8,597.60
Total
$336,236.11
$267,196.69
$69,039.42
Funding in the amount of $69,039.42 for the County's share of this project is budgeted and
available in the CARES Act allocation awarded to Information Technology (account 13924113-
066490).
Copies of the Funding Decision Commitmert Letters for the projects are on file in the Purchasing
Division.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends the Board accept the grant funding and authorize the Purchasing Division to
issue a purchase order to PC Solutions & Integration, Inc. for $60,441.82 and to Bazon-Cox &
Associates, Inc. for $8,597.60.
17
OL/
Consent Agenda
Indian River County
Interoffice Memorandum
Office of Management & Budget
To:
Members of the Board of County Commissioners
From:
Kristin Daniels
Director, Office of Management & Budget
Date:
October 11, 2021
Subject:
Miscellaneous Budget Amendment 011
Description and Conditions
1. On August 17, 2021, the Board of County Commissioners approved the EMPG-ARPA grant
for $13,926 and the EMPA grant for $80,205. Exhibit "A" appropriates the revenue and
expenses of the grants.
2. On August 17, 2021, the Board of County Commissioners approved revisions to the American
Rescue Plan Act Spending Plan. Exhibit "A" appropriates the revenues and expenses in the
amount of $15,531,584 to the various Constitutional Officers, Agencies and expenditures.
3. Additional Court Cost revenue received is higher than anticipated. Exhibit "A" appropriates
$8,155 in additional revenue and expenses to the General Fund and $16,966 in additional
revenue and expenses to the Additional Court Costs Fund.
4. On June 22, 2021, the Board of County Commissioners approved the Indian River Lagoon
Council Small Grant Contract Number 2021SG-06 for $3,816. Exhibit "A" appropriates the
revenues and expenses of the grant.
5. On September 21, 2021 the Board of County Commissioners approved Sheriff Flowers'
request to purchase $15,469 in equipment from the Offender Fees reserve account. Exhibit
"A" appropriates the revenue and expense.
6. The Indian River Lacrosse Association has requested $12,085.23 from the County to help pay
for higher than anticipated electric bills at the Dick Bird Park. Exhibit "A" appropriates funding
from General Fund/Reserve for Contingency.
7. Additional monies have been awarded to Rental Assistance from the US Department of
Housing and Urban Development for the Section 8 Housing Choice Voucher Program. Exhibit
"A" appropriates $100,088 in revenue and expenses.
8. The Property Appraiser and Tax Collector have additional postage expenses of $1,886. The
Property Appraiser also has an additional $5,400 in worker's compensation expenses. Exhibit
"A" appropriates $7,286 from General Fund/Reserve for Contingency.
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends the Board of County Commissioners approve the budget resolution amending the
fiscal year 2020-2021 budget.
IV
RESOLUTION NO. 2021-
A RESOLUTION OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA,
AMENDING THE FISCAL YEAR 2020-2021 BUDGET.
WHEREAS, certain appropriation and expenditure amendments to the
adopted Fiscal Year 2020-2021 Budget are to be made by resolution pursuant to
section 129.06(2), Florida Statutes; and
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County
desires to amend the fiscal year 2020-2021 budget, as more specifically set forth
in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and by this reference made a part hereof,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that the Fiscal Year
2020-2021 Budget be and hereby is amended as set forth in Exhibit "A" upon
adoption of this Resolution.
This Resolution was moved for adoption by
, and the motion was seconded by Commissioner
and, upon being put to a vote, the vote was as follows:
Chairman Joseph E. Flescher
Vice Chairman Peter D. O'Bryan
Commissioner Susan Adams
Commissioner Joe Earman
Commissioner Laura Moss
Commissioner
The Chairman thereupon declared this Resolution duly passed and adopted this
day of )2021.
Attest: Jeffrey R. Smith
Clerk of Court and Comptroller
Deputy Clerk
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
Board of County Commissioners
APPROVED AS TO FORM
AND LEGAL SUFFICIENCY
BY
COUNTY ATT39NEY
Resolution No. 2021 -
Budget Office Approval:
Kristin Daniels, Budget Director
Exhibit "A"
BudgetAmendment 011
Entry
Number
Type
Fund/ Department/Account Name
Account Number
Increase
Decrease
Revenue
General Fund/EMPG-ARPA Grant
001033-331231-21721
$13,926
$0
General Fund/EMPG Grant
001033-331231
$80,205
$0
General Fund/Emergency Mgmt/Other Professional
Services/EMPG-ARPA
00120825-033190-21721
$3,926
$0
General Fund/Emergency Mgmt./Computer Hardware-
EMPG-ARPA
00120825-035130-21721
$10,000
$0
1.
General Fund/Emergency Mgmt/Other Professional
Services-EMPG
00120825-033190-05050
$26,963
$0
Expense
General Fund/Emergency Mgmt/All Travel-EMPG
00120825-034020-05050
$11,440
$0
General Fund/Emergency Mgmt/Outside Printing-EMPG
00120825-034720-05050
$6,500
$0
General Fund/Emergency Mgmt/Computer Software-
EMPG
00120825-035120-05050
$34,192
$0
General Fund/Emergency Mgmt/Tu tion/Registration Fee-
EMPG
00120825-035430-05050
$1,110
$C
Revenue
ARP Fund/American Rescue Plan Act
138033-331551
$15,531,584
$0
ARP Fund/SHARP Program/Regular Salaries
13822469-011120
$21,500
$0
ARP Fund/SHARP Program/Overtime
13822469-011140
$20,000
$0
ARP Fund/SHARP Program/Social Security
13822469-012110
$2,500
$0
ARP Fund/SHARP Program/Retirement Contribution
13822469-012120
$4,500
$0
ARP Fund/SHARP Program/Insurance-Life & Health
13822469-012130
$500
$0
ARP Fund/SHARP Program/Medicare Matching
13822469-012170
$1,000
$0
ARP Fund/Sheriff/Workers Compensation
13860021-012140
$400,000
$0
ARP Fund/Fire Services/Workers Compensation
13812022-012140
$500,000
$0
ARP Fund/Fire Services/Operating Supplies
13812022-035290
$100,000
$0
ARP Fund/Fire Services/Other Machinery & Equipment
13812022-066490
$350,000
$0
ARP Fund/Info Systems/Broadband Professional Services
13824113-033194
$750,000
$0
ARP Fund/Info Systems/Other Professional Services
13824113-033190
$200,000
$0
2
ARP Fund/Info Systems/Software
13824113-068003
$17,500
$0
Expense
ARP Fund/Info Systems/Computer Software
13824113-035120
$17,500
$J
ARP Fund/Facilities/Other Professional Services
13822019-033190
$150,000
$3
ARP Fund/Purchasing/Operating Supplies
13821613-035290
$75,000
$0
ARP Fund/Budget/Other Professional Services
13822913-033190
$5,000
$D
ARP Fund/Small Business Grants
13811059-088715
$1,000,000
$0
ARP Fund/Non-Profit Assistance Program
13811059-088723
$500,000
$0
ARP Fund/SHARP Program
13822469-088055
$802,172
$0
ARP Fund/Chamber of Commerce
13811059-088750
$275,000
$0
ARP Fund/United Way
13811069-088006
$350,000
$0
ARP Fund/Clerk of Circuit Court
13830086-099020
$500,000
$0
ARP Fund/Sheriff
13860086-099040
$2,000,000
$0
ARP Fund/Property Appraiser
13850086-099060
$4,000
$0
ARP Fund/Supervisor of Elections
13870086-099110
$146,378
$0
ARP Fund/Tax Collector
13840086-099070
$100,000
$0
LV
I of 2
Resolution No. 2021 -
Budget Office Approval:
Kristin Daniels, Budget Director
Exhibit "A"
BudgetAmendment 011
Entry
Number
Type
Fund/ Department/Account Name
Account Number
Increase
Decrease
ARP Fund/Transfers Out
13819981-099210
$2,250,000
$0
ARP Fund/Budget/Inter-Dept Charges
13822913-036990
$75,000
$0
2.
Expense
ARP Fund/IRSC Fellsmere Inn Purchase
13811059-088724
$1,500,000
$0
ARP Fund/Road & Bridge/Road Resurfacing
13821441-053360
$1,138,012
$0
ARP Fund/Road & Bridge/Road Restriping
13821441-053370
$2,276,022
$0
Revenue
Additional Court Costs/Service Charges
141034-348900
$16,966
$0
General Fund/Additional Court Costs/Law Library
001034-348923
$8,155
$0
3.
Additional Court Costs/Legal Services
14190664-033110
$8,483
$0
Expense
Additional Court Costs/DJJ/Teen Court
14191023-088401
$8,483
$0
General Fund/Law Library/Books
00111914-035450
$8,155
$0
Revenue
General Fund/IRL Council Small Grant 2021SG-06
001033-337308
$3,816
$0
4.
Expense
General Fund/Conservation Lands/Other Operating
Supplies
00121572-035290
$3,816
$0
5.
Revenue
General Fund/Sheriff-Sex Offender Registration Fee
001034-341521
$15,469
$0
Expense
General Fund/Sheriff-Law Enforcement
00160086-099040
$15,469
$0
6.
Expense
General Fund/Parks/Electric
00121072-034310
$12,086
$0
General Fund/Reserves/Reserve for Contingency
00119981-099910
$0
$12,086
Section 8/HUD Low Income Housing Assist
108033-331670
$64,257
$0
Revenue
Section 8/HUD Section 8 Grant -Admin Fee
108033-331671
$26,974
$0
7.
Section 8/Port In Admin Fees Earned
108034-349006
$8,857
$0
Expense
Section 8Nash-Rental Assistance
10822264-036734
$20,000
$0
Section 8/Rental Assistance Payments
10822264-036730
$80,088
$0
General Fund/Tax Collector/Postage
00140013-034210
$415
$0
General Fund/Property Appraiser/Postage
00150013-034210
$1,471
$0
8.
Expense
General Fund/Property Appraiser/Worker's Compensation
00150013-034210
$5,400
$0
General Fund/Reserves/Reserve for Contingency
00119981-099910
$0
$7,286
21
2 of
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
MEMORANDUM
TO: Jason E. Brown, County Administrator
THROUGH: Richard B. Szpyrka, P.E., Public Works Director
James W. Ennis, P.E., PMP, Assistant Public Works Director
FROM: Kirstin Leiendecker, P.E., Roadway Production Manger
■
SUBJECT: FDOTTransportation Regional Incentive Program (TRIP) Supplemental Agreement
No. 3 for 66th Avenue Roadway Widening (49th Street to 69th Street) FM No.
436379-1-54-01;436379-1-54-02 (IRC -1505)
DATE: October 8, 2021
DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS
On May 7, 2019 the Board of County Commissioners approved Resolution No. 2019-034 and a
Transportation Regional Incentive Program (TRIP) Agreement with the Florida Department of
Transportation (FDOT) for the widening of 66th Avenue from a two-lane to a four -lane divided highway from
49th Street to 691h Street as well as for Construction Engineering Inspection (CEI) services with an estimated
cost of the project of $36,700,692.00. The FDOT TRIP grant amount was originally approved for
$4,747,018.00 with the County's cost share to be $31,953,674.00 and the agreement was executed by the
FDOT on May 22, 2019. Two Supplemental Agreements were subsequently approved by the BCC and the
FDOT, revising the estimated cost of the project to $37,226,671.00 and increasingthe grant amount total to
$18,613,335.00 for construction and CEI costs with the County's cost share to be $18,613,336.00.
Supplemental Agreement No. 3 is to support a time extension to the Terms of the Agreement to December
31, 2023. The original Agreement required Construction to be completed by June 30, 2021. Amendment
No. 2 extended the contract time to June 30, 2022. The County issued Notice to Proceed to the General
Contractor Halley Engineering Contractors, Inc. on June 1, 2021 with a construction contract time to Final
Completion of 750 days. A time extension is required to avoid expiration of the agreement prior to project
completion. In addition, this amendment modifies the Exhibit A, Deliverables containing contract bid items/
quantities and changes resulting from the revision of the North Relief Canal Bridge.
FUNDING
There is no additional funding required for the Supplemental Agreement No. 3.
Account Name
Account Number
Amount
Traffic Impact Fees/District 2 Roads/Construction
Progress/66th Ave/4911 St - 69th St
10215241-066510-07806
$5,818 991.00
'
Optional Sales Tax/66th Ave/49th St - 691h St
31521441-066510-07806
$12,794,345.00
FDOT Grant Funding per FDOT TRIP Agreements
Reimbursable Amount
$18,613,335.00
Estimated Cost of Project:
$37,226,671.00
22
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends the Board of County Commissioners approve MOT Transportation Regional Incentive
Program (TRIP) Supplemental Agreement No. 3 and Authorizing Resolution and authorize the Chairman to
execute the same.
ATTACHMENTS
1. Authorizing Resolution
2. FDOT TRIP Supplemental Agreement No. 3 FM No. 436379-1-54-01 & 436379-1-54-02
APPROVED AGENDA ITEM FOR OCTOBER 19, 2021
23
RESOLUTION NO. 2021 -
RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
AUTHORIZING THE CHAIRMAN'S EXECUTION OF TRANSPORTATION REGIONAL INCENTIVE
PROGRAM SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT NO. 3 WITH THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF
TRANSPORTATION FOR 66TH AVENUE ROADWAY WIDENING FROM 49TH STREET TO 69TH STREET FOR
CONSTRUCTION AND CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING INSPECTION (CEI) SERVICES
WHEREAS, the widening of 66th Avenue from a two-lane to a four -lane divided highway from
49th Street to 691h Street and all ancillary construction work is an Indian River County priority project;
and
WHEREAS, the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) is prepared to provide funds to
pay a portion of the cost for the widening of 66th Avenue from a two-lane to a four -lane divided
highway from 49th Street to 69th Street and all ancillary construction work, as well as construction
engineering inspection (CIE) services under the Transportation Regional Incentive Program (TRIP); and
WHEREAS, the State of Florida, Department of Transportation, has requested Indian River
County execute and deliver to the State of Florida, Department of Transportation, Transportation
Regional Incentive Supplemental Agreement No. 3 for updated Deliverables (Exhibit A of the
Agreement) and to extend the project completion time until December 31, 2023; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN
RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that the Chairman of the Board is hereby authorized to make, execute, and
deliver to the State of Florida, Department of Transportation, Transportation Regional Incentive
Program Supplemental Agreement No. 3 for the aforementioned project.
The foregoing resolution was offered by Commissioner
motion was seconded by Commissioner
follows:
Chairman Joseph E. Flescher
Vice -Chairman Peter O'Bryan
Commissioner Susan Adams
Commissioner Joe Earman
Commissioner Laura Mcss
who moved its adoption. The
and, upon being put to a vote, the vote was as
The Chairman thereupon declared the resolution passed and adopted this day of
2021.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSSIONERS
OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
By
Joseph E. Flescher, Chairman
Attest: Jeffrey R. Smith, Clerk of Court
and Comptroller
By:
Deputy Clerk
Approved as to Form and Legal Sufficiency
William K. DeBraal, Deputy County Attorney
24
Page 1 of 2
SUPPLEMENTAL NO.
CONTRACT NO.
G1952
FPN
436379-1-54-01; 436379-1-54-02
Recipient: INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
This Supplemental Agreement ("Supplemental`), dated arises from the desire to supplement the State -Funded
Grant Agreement ("Agreement") entered into and executed on 5/22/2019 as identified above. All provisions in the
Agreement and supplements, if any, remain in effect except as expressly modified by this Supplemental.
The parties agree that the Agreement is to be amended and supplemented as follows:
This Amendment extends the Term of the Agreement from June 30, 2022 to December 31, 2023.
Paragraph 3 of the Agreement is amended to read as follows:
This Agreement shall commence upon full execution by both Parties and the Recipient shall complete the Project on or
before December 31, 2023.
In addition this amendment modifies the Exhibit A Deliverables
Reason for this Supplemental and supporting engineering and/or cost analysis:
The Agency issued Notice to Proceed on June 1, 2021 with a total Contract time of 750 days. A time extension is needed
in order for the Agreement to avoid expiration prior to project completion.
The initial contract bid items/quantities changed as a result of the revision of the North Relief Canal Bridge.
25
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused these presents to be executed the day and year
first above written.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
Name of RECIPIENT)
C
MYYY- :ralIRkrat Z
Print Name: Joseph E. Flescher
Date:
ATTEST:
Jeffrey R. Smith, Clerk of Court & Comptroller
LIM
, Deputy Clerk
STATE OF FLORIDA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
C
TITLE: DIRECTOR OF TRANSP. DEVELOPMENT
Print Name: STEVEN C. BRAUN, P.E.
FDOT OFFICE OF THE GENERAL COUNSEL
LEGAL REVIEW:
See attached encumbrance form for date of
Funding approval by Comptroller
APPROVED AS TO FORM & LEGAL SUFFICIENCY:
Recipient's LEGAL REVIEW:
Print Name: WILLIAM K. DEBRAAL
DEPUTY COUNTY ATTORNEY
Page 2 of 2
26
66th AVENUE ROWADWAY WIDENING FROM 49TH STREET TO 69TH STREET
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FL
FM# 436379-1-54-01.436379-1-54-02
27
ITEM
ESTIMATED
OTYS
UNIT
PHASE 1A: STA 294+93 TO STA 354+00
ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS
101-1
MOBILIZATION
1
LS
102-1
MAINTENANCE OF TRAFFIC
1
LS
"102-14
TRAFFIC CONTROL OFFICER OFF DU
500
PH
'IRC 1
FIELD OFFICE
1
LS
104-2
PREVENT, CONTROL & ABATEMENT OF EROSION AND WATER POLLUTION
1
LS
110-1-1
CLEARING AND GRUBBING
1
LS
110-7-1
MAILBOX F&I
3
EA
120-1
REGULAR EXCAVATION
5801
CY
1204
SUBSOIL EXCAVATION
1000
CY
120-5
CHANNEL EXCAVATION LAKE EXCAVATION
35755
CY
120-6
EMBANKMENT, COMPACTED IN PLACE
89721
CY
121-70
FLOWABLE FILL
100
CY
1604
TYPE B STABILIZATION SHOULDER LBR-40)
82243
SY
285-7-09
OPTIONAL BASE, BASE GROUP 09
64018
SY
286-1
TURNOUT CONSTRUCTION
619
SY
286-2
TURNOUT CONSTRUCTION - ASPHALT
135
TN
334-1-13
SUPERPAVE ASPHALTIC CONCRETE, TRAFFIC C 1-3/4" THICK
6162
TN
337-7-82
TYPE FC -9.5 ASPHALT CONCRETE FRICTION COURSE,TRAFFIC C, PG 76-22, PMA 1-1/4" THICK
4401
TN
339-1
MISCELLANEOUS ASPHALT PAVEMENT
56
TN
350-3-1
PLAIN CEMENT CONCRETE 6"
743
SY
400-1-2
CONCRETE CLASS I ENDWALLS
18
CY
425-1-351
INLET, CURB, TYPE P-5, <10'
8
EA
425-1-361
INLET, CURB, TYPE P-6, <10'
13
EA
425-1-451
INLET, CURB, TYPE J-5, <10'
3
EA
IRC 3
CONFLICT STRUCTURE
2
EA
425-1-461
INLET, CURB, TYPE J-6 < 10'
4
EA
425-1-521
INLET, DITCH BOTTOM, TYPE C < 10'
8
EA
IRC2
CONTROLSTRUCTURE
3
EA
425-2-41
MANHOLES, P-7, < 10'
3
EA
425-2-71
MANHOLES J-7 < 10'
1
EA
425-2-72
MANHOLES, J-7, > 10'
1
EA
425-2-73
MANHOLES, J-7, PARTIAL
1
EA
430-175-118
PIPE CULVERT. OPTION MATERIAL, ROUND, 18"S/CQ RCP
2356
LF
430-175-118A PIPE CULVERT. OPTION MATERIAL, ROUND, 18"S/CD CAP
140
LF
430-175-124
PIPE CULVERT. OPTION MATERIAL, ROUND, 24"S/Cd RCP
1191
LF
430-175-124A PIPE CULVERT. OPTION MATERIAL, ROUND, 24"S/CD CAP
60
LF
430-175-130
PIPE CULVERT. OPTION MATERIAL, ROUND, 30"S/CD RCP
1398
LF
430-175-130A PIPE CULVERT. OPTION MATERIAL, ROUND, 30"S/CD CAP
20
LF
430-175-136
PIPE CULVERT. OPTION MATERIAL, ROUND, 36"S/CD RCP
799
LF
430-175-142
PIPE CULVERT. OPTION MATERIAL, ROUND, 42"S/CD RCP
600
LF
430-175-148
PIPE CULVERT. OPTION MATERIAL, ROUND, 48"S/CQ RCP
392
LF
430-175-360
PIPE CULVERT. OPTION MATERIAL, ROUND, 48" X 76" S/CD RCP
197
LF
430-175-160
PIPE CULVERT. OPTION MATERIAL, ROUND, 60"S/CD RCP
80
LF
430-175-166
PIPE CULVERT OPTION MATERIAL, ROUND, 66" S/CD RCP
141
LF
430-175-175
PIPE CULVERT OPTION MATERIAL ROUND 72" S/CD RCP
64
LF
IRC 4
PIPE CULVERT, SCHEDULE 80 PVC, ROUND, 8"
31
LF
430-982-125
MITERED END SECTION RCP 18"
18
EA
440-1-10
UNDERDRAIN WITH SOCK FILTER 4" DIAMETER
697
LF
440-1-10A
UNDERDRAIN WITH SOCK FILTER 8" DIAMETER
257
LF
440-7-34
UNDERDRAIN WITH SOCK FILTER 10" DIAMETER
27
LF
440-7-35
UNDERDRAIN WITH SOCK FILTER 12" DIAMETER
48
LF
514-71-2
PLASTIC FILTER FABRIC STABILIZATION
351
SY
520-1-7
CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER TYPE E MODIFIED
368
LF
520-1-10
CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER, TYPE F
24341
LF
522-2
CONCRETE SIDEWALK FIBER REINFORCED 6" THICK
5572
SY
'523-2
PATTERNED PAVEMENT CONCRETE, NON -VEHICULAR AREAS
3160
SY
527-2
DETECTABLE WARNINGS
80
SF
530-3-3
RIPRAP, RUBBLE, BANK AND SHORE
1156
TN
536-1-1
GUARDRAIL ROADWAY INCLUDES PIPE RAIL FULL LENGTH
1867
LF
536-8
GUARDRAIL- BRIDGE ANCHORING ASSEMBLY FURNISH AND INSTALL
1
EA
536-73
GUARDRAIL REMOVAL
280
LF
27
(*) = Non -Participating Items
(**) = Converting to Lump Sum
ITEM
ESTIMATED
NIT
UNIT
536-82
GUARDRAIL ANCHORAGE- CONCRETE BARRIER WALL
3
EA
536-85-24
GUARDRAIL END ANCHORAGE ASSEMBLY- PARALLEL
3
EA
536-85-25
GUARDRAIL END ANCHORAGE ASSEMBLY -TYPE II
2
EA
IRC 5
FENCE, RELOCATE EXISTING
502
LF
550-10-222
IFENCING TYPE B, 5.1-6.0' WNINYL COATING
3325
LF
550-60-214
FENCE GATE, TYPE B SINGLE, 18.1-20.0C OPENING
6
EA
570-1-1
PERFORMANCE TURF — SOD 1 BAHIA
85449
SY
570-1-2
PERFORMANCE TURF - SOD 2 ST. AUGUSTINE
14680
SY
'COMBINED
LANDSCAPING
1
LS
`590-70
IRRIGATION SYSTEM (COMPLETE)
1
LS
700-1-5
SINGLE POST SIGN RELOCATED
2
AS
700-1-60
SINGLE POST SIGN, REMOVED
20
AS
700-20-11
SINGLE POST SIGN, F&I, GROUND MOUNT, UP TO 12 SF
27
AS
700-20-13
SINGLE POST SIGN, F&I, GROUND MOUNT, 21-30 SF
4
AS
706-3
RETRO -REFLECTIVE PAVEMENT MARKERS BI-DIR, AMBER/AMBER
880
EA
706-3A
RETRO -REFLECTIVE PAVEMENT MARKERS BI-DIR, WHITE/RED
445
EA
711-11-111
THERMOPLASTIC, STANDARD, WHITE, SOLID, 6"
4.09
NM
711-11-112
THERMOPLASTIC, STANDARD WHITE, SOLID, 8"
0.513
NM
711-11-123
THERMOPLASTIC, STANDARD, WHITE, SOLID, 12"
683
LF
711-11-124
THERMOPLASTIC, STANDARD, WHITE, SOLID, 18"
715
LF
711-11-125
THERMOPLASTIC, STANDARD, WHITE, SOLID, 24"
136
LF
711-11-131
THERMOPLASTIC, STANDARD, WHITE, SKIP, 6", 10-30 SKIP
2.132
GM
711-11-131A
THERMOPLASTIC, STANDARD WHITE, SKIP, 6" 6-10 SKIP
2559
LF
711-14-170
THERMOPLASTIC STANDARD WHITE ARROW
28
EA
711-14-170A
THERMOPLASTIC, STANDARD, WHITE, ARROW, U -TERN
23
EA
711-11-211
THERMOPLASTIC STANDARD YELLOW SOLID 6"
3.95
NM
711-11-224
THERMOPLASTIC, STANDARD, YELLOW, SOLID, 18"
202
LF
711-11-241
THERMOPLASTIC, STANDARD, YELLOW, DOTTED/GUIDELINE/6-10 GAP EXTENSION, 6"
1764
LF
'1050-11-224
12" PVC REUSE WATER MAIN
670
LF
'1050-11-424
12" DIP REUSE WATER MAIN
90
LF
"1080 1125
2" AIR RELEASE VALVE
1
EA
'IRC 6
CAP AND GROUT EXISTING 12" REUSE MAIN
294
LF
'IRC 7
REMOVE AND DIPOSE OF EXISTING 12" AREAL REUSE MAIN AND PILINGS
1
LS
'IRC 8
17" X 28" METER BOX
2
EA
'1080-11-201
4" MECHANICAL JOINT GATE VALVE
2
EA
'1080-11-403
12"X12" TAPPING SLEEVE AND VALVE
2
EA
•1080-11-404
12" MECHANICAL JOINT GATE VALVE
2
EA
'IRC 9
FITTINGS
1
TN
0630 2 11A
2 - 2" PVC SIGNAL CONDUIT W/ 96 -FIBER CABLE 50' COIL IN BOXES OPEN TRENCH
5562
LF
0630 2 12A
2 - 2" PVC SIGNAL CONDUIT W/ 96 -FIBER CABLE 50' COIL IN BOXES DIRECTIONAL DRILL
209
LF
06331 123
96 -FIBER CABLE IN BRIDGE CONDUIT
129
LF
0635212
17" X 30" PULL BOX FOR FIBER OPTIC CABLE
9
EA
0635213
30" X 48" SPLICE BOX FOR FIBER OPTIC
8
EA
`580-1-1
LANDSCAPE COMPLETE SMALL PLANT
1
LS
'580-1-2
LANDSCAPE COMPLETE LARGE PLANTS
1
LS
'590 70
IRRIGATION SYSTEM, COMPLETE
1
LS
BRIDGE IMPROVEMENTS
53TH STREET OVER LATERAL 'A" CANAL
110-3
DEMOLITION AND REMOVAL EXISTING BRIDGE
1
LS
SUPERSTRUCTURE
400-24
CLASS II CONCRETE FOR CLOSURE POLRS BETWEEN DECK UNITS
15
CY
415-1-4
REINFORCING STEEL
990
LBS
12450-88-18A
PRESTRESSED PRECAST DECK UNITS 18" X 4'-3" X 36'-0" 12 REQUIRED
432
LF
12450-88-18B PRESTRESSED PRECAST DECK UNITS 18" X 4'-6" X 36'-0" 2 REQUIRED
72
LF
460-70-2
ALUMINUM BICYCLE BULLET BARRIER RAILING
74
LF
521-5-1
CONCRETE TRAFFIC RAILING BARRIER -'32" F SHAPE
37
LF
521-54
CONCRETE TRAFFIC RAILING BARRIER -32" VERTICAL SHAPE
37
LF
521-72-3
SHOULDER CONCRETE BARRIER WALL ONDEX 410- CANTALEVER WALL
100
LF
SUBSTRUCTURE
400-2-5
CLASS II CONCRETE FOR PILE CAPS
76
CY
415-1-5
REINFORCING STEEL
12300
LBS
455-133-2
PRESTRESSED PILE 18" SQUARE X 70'-0' MINUMUM TEST PILE- ABUTEMENT 2 EA
140
LF
455-34-2
PRESTRESSED PILE 18" SQUARE X 55'-0' MINUMUM (TEST PILE- ABUTEMENT) (19 EA
1045
LF
(*) = Non -Participating Items
(**) = Converting to Lump Sum
29
ITEM
ESTIMATED
UNIT
NIT
455-34-2A
PRESTRESSED PILE 14" SQUARE X 50'-0" MINUMUM TEST PILE- ABUTEMENT 12 EA
600
LF
455-137
PILE DYNAMIC LOAD TESTING
1
LS
455-14-5
8"X V-0 X 12'-0" SHEET WALL 26 EA
312
LF
SIDEWALKS
400-24A
CLASS II CONCRETE
8
CY
415-14A
REINFORCING STEEL
343
LBS
339-1
MISCELLANEOUS ASPHALT
8
TN
400-2-10
CLASS II CONCRETE
124
CY
415-1-9
REINFORCING STEEL
19570
LBS
530-3-3
ROCK RUBBLE CANAL EXCAVATION AS REDUIRED SHAL_ BE INCLUDED IN THE COST ROCK RUBBLE
1232
TN
715-2117
2" PVC CONDUIT
152
LF
29
(') = Non -Participating Items
(**) = Converting to Lump Sum
30
ITEM
ESTIMATED
UNIT
NIT
66TH AVENUE OVER "NORTH RELIEF" CANAL
110-3
DEMOLITION AND REMOVAL OF EXISTING BRIDGE
1
LS
SUPERSTRUCTURE
**400-24
CLASS II CONCRETE FOR CLOSURE POURS BETWEEN DECK UNITS
59
CY
**415-1-4
REINFORCING STEEL
3546
LBS
-12450$8-15A PRESTRESSED PRECAST DECK UNITS 15" X 4'-5" X 14'-0" 48 REQUIRED
672
LF
-1245088-15B
PRESTRESSED PRECAST DECK UNITS 15" X 4'-8" X 14'-0" 4 REQUIRED
56
LF
**12450-88-15C PRESTRESSED PRECAST DECK UNITS 18" X 4'-5" X 34'-0" 24 REQUIRED
816
LF
-1245058-15D
PRESTRESSED PRECAST DECK UNITS 18" X 4'-8" X 34'-0" 2 REQUIRED
68
LF
**460-70-2
ALUMINUM BICYCLE BULLET BARRIER FAILING
250
LF
**521-5-1
CONCRETE TRAFFIC RAILING, BARRIER - 32" F SHAPE
125
LF
**521-5-4
CONCRETE TRAFFIC RAILING, BARRIER - 32" VERTICAL SHAPE
125
LF
**460-70-3
CONCRETE TRAFFIC RAILING BARRIER SHOULDER) W/ SPREAD FOOTING INDEX 410
75.33
LF
SUBSTRUCTURE
**400-2-5
CLASS II CONCRETE FOR PILE CAPS
216
CY
**415-1-5
REINFORCING STEEL
40298
LBS
**455-34-3
PRESTRESSED PILE 18" SQUARE X 75'-C' MINUMUM TEST PILE -ABUTMENT 1 EA
75
LF
**455-34-3A
PRESTRESSED PILE 18" SQUARE X 60'-C' MINUMUM ABUTMENT 33 EA
1980
LF
**455-34-3B
PRESTRESSED PILE 14" SQUARE X 30'-C' MINUMUM WING BENT 12 EA
360
LF
**455-34-3C
PRESTRESSED PILE 18" SQUARE X 100'=0" MINUMUM TEST PILE- INTERMEDIATE BENT 1 EA
100
LF
**455-34-3D
PRESTRESSED PILE 18" SQUARE X 60'-C" MINUMUM DEBRIS PILE- INTERMEDIATE BENT
120
LF
**455-34-3E
PRESTRESSED PILE 18" SQUARE X 85-C" MINUMUM TEST PILE- INTERMEDIATE BENT 41 EA
3485
LF
'*455-13-3
8" X 8'-0 X 14'-0" SHEET WALL
560
LF
SIDEWALKS AND MEDIANS
**400-2-4A
CLASS II CONCRETE
164
CY
**415-1-4A
REINFORCING STEEL
7252
LBS
APPROACH SLABS
**339-1
MISCELLANEOUS ASPHALT
524
SF
**400-2-10
CLASS II CONCRETE
260
CY
**415-1-9
REINFORCING STEEL
57030
LBS
**530-3-3
(ROCK RUBBLE) (CANAL EXCAVATION AS REQUIRED SHALL BE INCLUDED IN THE COST
OF THE ROCK RUBBLE)
1800
TN
**715-2117
2" PVC CONDUIT
630
LF
57TH STREET OVER LATERAL A"CANAL
110-3
DEMOLITION AND REMOVAL OF EXISTING BRIDGE
1
LS
SUPERSTRUCTURE
460-70-2
ALUMINUM BICYCLE BULLETE BARRIER RAILING
41
LF
521-5-1
CONCRETE TRAFFIC RAILING BARRIER- 32" F SHAPE
41
LF
521-54
CONCRETE TRAFFIC RAILING BARRIER- 32" VERTICAL SHAPE
41
LF
521-72-3
SHOULDER CONCRETE BARRIER WALL INDEX 410- CANTALEVER WALL
48
LF
SIDEWALKS
400-24
CLASS 11 CONCRETE
6
CY
415-1-9A
REINFORCING STEEL
2553
LBS
APPROACH SLABS
400-2-10
CLASS 11 CONCRETE
58
CY
415-1-9
1 REINFORCING STEEL
11380
LBS
715-2-117
4" PVC CONDUIT
156
LF
(') = Non -Participating Items
(**) = Converting to Lump Sum
30
31
ITEM
ESTIMATED
NIT
UNIT
PHASE IB STA 354+00 TO STA 444+57.04
101-1
MOBILIZATION / DEMOBILIZATION
1
LS
102-1
MAINTENANCE OF TRAFFIC
1
LS
'102-14
TRAFFIC CONTROL OFFICER
500
PH
104-2
PREVENT, CONTROL & ABATEMENT OF EROSION AND WATER POLLUTION
1
LS
110-1-1
CLEARING AND GRUBBING
86
AC
110-7-1
MAILBOX F81
40
EA
120-1
REGULAR EXCAVATION
81595
CY
120-4
SUBSOIL EXCAVATION
3198
CY
120-5
CHANNEL EXCAVATION
890
CY
120-6
EMBANKMENT
128124
CY
160-4
TYPE B STABILIZATION
123552
SY
285-709
OPTIONAL BASE BASE GROUP 9
108050
SY
286-1
TURNOUT CONSTRUCTION
2320
SY
327-70-01
MILLING EXISTING ASPHALT PAVEMENT 1" AVG. DE-TH
118
SY
334-1-13
SUPERPAVE ASPHALTIC CONCRETE, SP 12.5 TRAFFIC C 1.75"
11959
TN
337-7-82
TYPE FC -9.5 ASPHALT CONCRETE FRICTION COURSE,TRAFFIC C, PG 76-22, PMA 1-1/4" THICK
5980
TN
339-1
MISCELLANEOUS APSHALT PAVEMENT
34
TN
400-1-2
CLASS I CONCRETE ENDWALL
13
CY
400-2-2
CLASS 11 CONCRETE ENDWALL
126
CY
400-4-1
REINFORCED CONCRETE BOX CULVERT 12' X 10'
72
LF
415-1-1
REINFORCING STEEL ROADWAY
6510
LB
425-1-351
INLET, CURB, TYPE P-5, <10'
32
EA
425-1-361
INLET, CURB, TYPE P-6, <10'
20
EA
425-1-451
INLET, CURB, TYPE J-5, <10'
6
EA
425-1-452
INLET, CURB, TYPE J-5, >10'
4
EA
425-1-452A
INLETS CURB TYPE J-5 >10' CONTROL STRUCTURE W/ INTERNAL WEIR
1
EA
425-1-461
INLET, CURB, TYPE J-6 < 10'
11
EA
425-1462
INLET, CURB, TYPE J-6 > 10'
1
EA
425-1-521
INLET, DITCH BOTTOM, TYPE C < 10'
18
EA
425-1-521A
INLET, DITCH BOTTOM, TYPE C < 10' CONTROL STRUCTURE W/ EXTERNAL SKIMMER
3
EA
425-1-531
INLETS DT BOT TYPE C MOD. <10' BACK OF SW'K INLET
2
EA
425-1-541
INLETS, DITCH BOTTOM, TYPE D < 10'
2
EA
425-1-541A
INLETS DITCH BOTTOM), TYPE D < 10' CONTROL S-RUCTURE W/ EXTERNAL SKIMMER
5
EA
425-1-543
INLETS DT BOT TYPED <10') (W/J BOTTOM
2
EA
425-1-559
INLETS DITCH BOTTOM TYPE E >10' CONTROL STRUCTURE W/ INTERNAL WEIR
2
EA
425-1-581
INLETS DT BOT TYPE H <10' CONTROL STRUCTURE W/ INTERNAL WEIR
1
EA
425-1-713
INLETS GUTTER VALLEY(J-BOTTOM)
1
EA
425-1-910
INLETS GUTTER CLOSED FLUME
1
EA
425-2-61
MANHOLES, (P-8)(<10')
3
EA
425-2-71
MANHOLES J-7 <10' CONFLICT STRUCTURE
1
EA
425-2-72
MANHOLES, J-7 >10'
1
EA
430-175-115
PIPE CULVERT RCP ROUND) (15"SS)
433
LF
430-175-118
PIPE CULVERT RCP ROUND) (18"SS)
6981
LF
430-175-118A PIPE CULVERT (CAP) ROUND) (18"SS)
120
LF
430-175-124
PIPE CULVERT RCP ROUND) (24"SS)
2387
LF
430-175-124A PIPE CULVERT CAP ROUND) (24"SS)
112
LF
430-175-130
PIPE CULVERT RCP ROUND) (30"SS)
3419
LF
430-175-130A PIPE CULVERT CAP ROUND 30" SS
62
LF
430-175-136
PIPE CULVERT RCP ROUND) (36"SS)
2640
LF
430-175-136A PIPE CULVERT CAP ROUND) (36"SS)
40
LF
430-175-142
PIPE CULVERT RCP ROUND) (42"SS)
115
LF
430-175-142A PIPE CULVERT CAP ROUND) (42"SS)
40
LF
430-175-148
PIPE CULVERT RCP ROUND) (48"SS)
240
LF
430-175-148A PIPE CULVERT CAP ROUND) (48"SS)
20
LF
430-175-160
PIPE CULVERT RCP ROUND) (60"SS)
1470
LF
430-175-166
PIPE CULVERT RCP ROUND) (66"SS)
408
LF
430-175-215
PIPE CULVERT ERCP 12" X 18" SS
60
LF
430-175-218
PIPE CULVERT ERCP 14" X 23" SS
239
LF
430-175-236
PIPE CULVERT ERCP 29" X 45" SS
374
LF
430-964-3
PVC PIPE 8") (SCH 80
1678
LF
430-982-123
MITERED END SECTION CONC. 15" CD
7
EA
430-982-125
MITERED END SECTION CONC. 18" CD
15
EA
430-982-623
MITERED END SECTION CONC. 12"X18" CD
2
EA
31
32
ITEM
ESTIMATED
UNIT
NIT
430-982-625
MITERED END SECTION CONC. 14"X23" CD
7
EA
440-1-20
UNDERDRAIN
815
LF
440-1-60
ROCK DRAIN
640
LF
520-1-10
CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER TYPE F
26742
LF
520-1-11
CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER TYPE F MOD.
14915
LF
522-2
CONCRETE SIDEWALK, 6" THICK
13897
SY
527-2
DETECTABLE WARNINGS
187
SF
530-34
RIPRAP, RUBBLE (F&I) (DITCH LINING
2163
TN
536-1-1
GUARDRAIL(ROADWAY)
581
LF
536-85-22
GUARDRAIL END ANCHORAGE ASSEMBLY MELT
2
EA
536-85-25
GUARDRAIL END ANCHORAGE ASSEMBLY TYPE 11
2
EA
536-85-30
GUARDRAIL END ANCHORAGE ASSEMBLY ET -2000
4
EA
550-10-110A
FENCING PEA 5.0' STANDARD
256
LF
550-10-110B
FENCING PEA 4.0' STANDARD
328
LF
550-10-220
FENCING PE B 6.0' STANDARD
661
LF
550-10-222
FENCING(TYPE B 6.0' WITH VINYL COATING
4563
LF
550-10-410A
FENCING(WOOD) 4.0' 3 RAIL SPLIT RAIL
267
LF
550-10-410B
FENCING(WOOD) 5.0' 3 RAIL SPLIT RAIL
696
LF
550-60-213
FENCE GATE(TYPE B SINGLE 16.0' OPENING
1
EA
550-60-225
FENCE GATE TYPE B DOUBLE 24.0' OPENING
4
EA
550-60-912
FENCE GATE(WOOD) SINGLE 10.0' OPENING
1
EA
570-1-2A
PERFORMANCE TURF SOD BAHIA
175168
SY
'COMBINED
LANDSCAPING
1
LS
`590-70
IRRIGATION SYSTEM
1
LS
630-2-11A
CONDUIT OPEN TRENCH F & I 2"
8100
LF
630-2-11B
CONDUIT OPEN TRENCH F 2"
8100
LF
633-1-123
FIBER OPTIC CABLE F & I UNDERGROUND 49-96 FIBERS
9100
LF
633-2-31
FIBER OPTIC CONNECTION SPLICE
1728
EA
633-2-32
FIBER OPTIC CONNECTION TERMINATION
96
EA
635-2-12
PULL AND SPLICE BOX (F&I) (17" X 30" PULL BOX
16
EA
635-2-13
PULL AND SPLICE BOX (F&I) (30" X 48" SLACK BOX
3
EA
630-2-11
CONDUIT SIGNAL F & I OPEN TRENCH
370
LF
630-1-12
CONDUIT SIGNAL F & I DIRECTIONAL BORE
3520
LF
632-7-1
CABLE SIGNAL F & I
2
PI
632-7-6
CABLE SIGNAL REMOVE INTERSECTION
1
PI
635-2-11
PULL BOX F & I(TRAFFIC SIGNAL
36
EA
639-1-111
ELECTRICAL POWER SERVICE SIGNALS ABOVE GROUND METER PURCHASED
BY 2
AS
639-1-610
ELECTREATM6WER SERVICE (SIGNALS) (ABOVE GROUND) (REMOVE)
1
AS
639-2-1
ELECTRICAL SERVICE WIRE F & I
2
LS
639-3-11
ELECTRICAL SERVICE DISCONNECT F & I POLE MOUNTED
2
EA
641-2-12
PRESTRESSED CONC. POLE F & I TYPE P-11 SERVICE POLE
2
EA
641-2-80
PRESTRESSED CONC. POLE COMPLETE POLE REMOVAL
2
EA
646-1-11
ALUMINUM SIGNAL POLES PEDESTAL
10
EA
649-31-106
MAST ARM F & I WIND SPEED 150 W/O BACKPLATES / LUMINAIRE ARM LENGTH
36' 1
EA
649-31-107
MAST ARM F & I WIND SPEED 150 W/O BACKPLATES W/ LUMINAIRE ARM LENGTH
46' 1
EA
649-31-108
MAST ARM F & I WIND SPEED 150 W/O BACKPLATES W/ LUMINAIRE ARM LENGTH
60' 3
EA
649-31-109
MAST ARM F & I WIND SPEED 150 W/O BACKPLATES / LUMINAIRE ARM LENGTH
70.5' 3
EA
650-1-14
TRAFFIC SIGNAL F & I 3 -SECTION 1 -WA STANDARD POLYCARBONATE
12
AS
650-1-16
TRAFFIC SIGNAL F & I ALUMINUM 4 -SECTION 1 -WA
4
AS
650-1-18
TRAFFIC SIGNAL F & I(5 -SECTION) 1 -WA STANDARD POLYCARBONATE
4
AS
653-1-11
PEDESTRIAN SIGNAL F & 1 LED -COUNTDOWN 1 -WA
12
AS
660-4-11
VEHICLE DETECTION SYSTEM F & I VIDEO CABINET EQUIPMENT
2
EA
660-4-12
IVEHICLE DETECTION SYSTEM F & I VIDEO ABOVE GROUND EQUIPMENT
8
EA
665-1-11
PEDESTRIAN DETECTOR F & I POLE/PEDESTAL MOUNTED
12
EA
670-5-111
TRAFFIC CONTROLLER ASSEMBLY F & I NEMA PE 5 ONE PREEMPTION
PLAN 2
AS
670-5-600
TRAFFIC CONTROLLER ASSEMBLY REMOVE - CONTROLLER WITH CABINET
1
AS
682-1-133
ITS CCN CAMERA F & I DOME ENCLOSURE NON -PRESSURIZED IP HD
4
EA
684-1-1
MANAGED FIELD ETHERNET SWITCH F & 1
2
EA
685-1-13
UNITERUPTABLE POWER SUPPLY F & I LINE INTERACTIVE
2
EA
700-5-22
INTERNALLY ILLUMINATGED SIGN F & I OVERHEAD MOUNT, 12-18 SF
8
EA
700-1-11
SINGLE POST SIGN F & I LESS THAN 12SF
75
AS
700-2-12
MULTI -POST SIGN F & I LESS THAN 12 - 20 SF
4
AS
705-10-4
OBJECT MARKER TYPE 4
12
EA
7063
RETRO -REFLECTIVE, STD, WHITE, SOLID, 6"
1811
FA
32
CEI CLASSIFICATIONS
SR. PROJECT ENGINEER
PROJECT ADMINISTRATOR
SR. INSPECTOR
INSPECTOR
INSPECTOR AIDE
CONTRACT SUPPORT SPECIALIST (CSS)
QUALITY CONTROL (QC) MANAGER
33
ITEM
ESTIMATED
NIT
UNIT
711-11-121
SOLID TRAFFIC STRIP 6" WHITE THERMOPLASTIC
35468
LF
711-11-122
SOLID TRAFFIC STRIP 8" WHITE THERMOPLASTIC
4501
LF
711-11-123
SOLID TRAFFIC STRIP 12" WHITE THERMOPLASTIC
1567
LF
711-11-124
SOLID TRAFFIC STRIP 18" WHITE THERMOPLASTIC
1230
LF
711-11-125
SOLID TRAFFIC STRIP 24" WHITE THERMOPLASTIC
470
LF
711-11-131
THERMOPLASTIC, STD, WHITE, SKIP 1O'-30'),6"
14849
LF
711-11-141
THERMOPLASTIC, STD, WHITE, SKIP 2'-4' / 6-10').6"
4354
LF
711-11-160
THERMOPLASTIC ST WHITE MESSAGE
45
EA
711-11-170
THERMOPLASTIC ST WHITE ARROW
111
EA
711-11-221
THERMOPLASTIC, STD, YELLOW, SOLID 6"
42171
LF
711-11-224
SOLID TRAFFIC STRIPE 18" YELLOW THERMOPLASTIC
1720
LF
711-11-241
THERMOPLASTIC, STD, YELLOW, SKIP 2'-4' / 6'-10'),6"
2471
LF
715-1-11
LIGHTING CONDUCTORS IF & I INSULATED, NO. 10 OR<
3735
LF
`570-1-213
PERFORMANCE TURF SOD ST AUGUSTINE'FLORATAM'
16355
SY
'580-1-1
LANDSCAPE SMALL PLANTS
1
LS
'580-1-2
LANDSCAPE LARGE PLANTS
1
LS
'580-12-10
FLORA -MULCH 3" DEPTH
717
CY
'162-1-3
PREPARED SOIL LAYER SPECIAL DEPT -1
1425
CY
`590-70
IRRIGATION COMPLETE
1
LS
BRIDGE IMPROVEMENTS
61ST STREET OVER LATERAL 'A"CANAL
110-3
REMOVAL OF EXISTING STRUCTURES/ BRIDGE
960
SF
400-2-4
CONCRETE CLASS II SUPERSTRUCTURE
9
CY
400-2-5
CONCRETE CLASS II, SUBSTRUCTURE
136
CY
400-2-10
CONCRETE CLASS II, APPROACH SLABS
99
CY
400-4-4
CONCRETE CLASS IV, SUPERSTRUCTURE
23
CY
400-148
PLAIN NEOPRENE BEARING PADS
2
CF
415-14
REINFORCING STEEL - BRIDGE SUPERSTRUCTURE
7390
LB
415-1-5
REINFORCING STEEL - BRIDGE SUBSTRUCTURE
9520
LB
415-1-9
REINFORCING STEEL - APPROACH SLAB
20400
LB
450-3-14
PRESTRESSED SLAB UNITS, WIDTH 48", THICKNESS 18"
40
LF
450-3-24
PRESTRESSED SLAB UNITS WIDTH 60" THICKNESS 18"
515
LF
455-34-3
PRESTRESSED CONCRETE PILING, 18" SQ
1560
LF
455-143-3
TEST PILES -PRESTRESSED CONCRETE 18" SQ
150
LF
458-1-11
BRIDGE DECK EXPANSION JOINT NEW CONSTRUCTION, F & I, POURED JOINT WITH BACKER ROD
138
LF
521-5-1
CONCRETE TRAFFIC RAILING- BRIDGE 32" F -SHAPE
82
LF
521-5-5
CONCRETE TRAFFIC RAILING- BRIDGE, 42" VERTICAL FACE
78
LF
65TH STREET OVER LATERAL A"CANAL
110-3
REMOVAL OF EXISTING STRUCTURE/ BRIDGE
960
SF
400-2-4
CONCRETE CLASS II, SUPERSTRUCTURE
9
CY
400-2-5
CONCRETE CLASS II SUBSTRUCTURE
136
CY
400-2-10
CONCRETE CLASS II APPROACH SLABS
99
CY
4004-4
CONCRETE CLASS IV, SUPERSTRUCTURE
23
CY
400-148
PLAIN NEOPRENE BEARING PADS
2
CF
415-14
REINFORCING STEEL - BRIDGE SUPERSTRUCTURE
7390
LB
415-1-5
REINFORCING STEEL - BRIDGE SUBSTRUCTURE
9520
LB
415-1-9
REINFORCING STEEL -APPROACH SLAB
20400
LB
450-3-14
PRESTRESSED SLAB UNITS WIDTH 48" THICKNESS 18"
40
LF
450-3-24
PRESTRESSED SLAB UNITS, WIDTH 60", THICKNESS 18"
515
LF
455-34-3
PRESTRESSED CONCRETE PILING 18" SQ
1560
LF
455-143-3
TEST PILES -PRESTRESSED CONCRETE 18" SQ
150
LF
458-1-11
BRIDGE DECK EXPANSION JOINT, NEW CONSTRUCTION, F & I, POURED JOINT WITH BACKER ROD
138
LF
521-5-1
CONCRETE TRAFFIC RAILING- BRIDGE 32" F -SHAPE
82
LF
521-5-5
CONCRETE TRAFFIC RAILING- BRIDGE, 42" VERTICAL FACE
78
LF
'999-1
CONSTRUCTION LAYOUT/ RECORD/ AS -BUILT DRAWINGS BY REGISTERED SURVEYOR
1
LS
CEI CLASSIFICATIONS
SR. PROJECT ENGINEER
PROJECT ADMINISTRATOR
SR. INSPECTOR
INSPECTOR
INSPECTOR AIDE
CONTRACT SUPPORT SPECIALIST (CSS)
QUALITY CONTROL (QC) MANAGER
33
ESTIMATED
ITEM QT,S UNIT
EARTHWORK CONSTRUCTION INSPECTOR LEVEL 1
EARTHWORK CONSTRUCTION INSPECTOR LEVEL 2
ASPHALT PAVING TECHNICIAN LEVEL 1
ASPHALT PAVING TECHNICIAN LEVEL 2
34
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
MEMORANDUM
TO: Jason E. Brown, County Administrator
THROUGH: Richard B. Szpyrka, P.E., Public Works Director
FROM: Eric Charest, Natural Resources Manager
r
SUBJECT: Amendment No. 1— FDEP Grant Agreement No. 191112 (Indian River County
Hurricane Irma Recovery Project (Sector 7 Beach and Dune Restoration))
DATE: October 6, 2021
DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS
The Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) received FY 2018/2019 funding to
assist eligible governmental entities for beach erosion control activities under the Florida Beach
Management Funding Assistance Program. On July 22, 2019, FDEP entered into Local
Government Funding Request (LGFR) Grant Agreement No. 191112 with Indian River County;
committing up to $307,538.00 for design and permit -required construction related activities for
the Sector 7 Beach and Dune Restoration Project.
On September 29, 2021, in response to a request from the County to FDEP for an extension to
the Task End Dates identified in the original agreement, FDEP issued Amendment No. 1 to Grant
191112. Amendment No. 1 maintains the same funding levels, but extends the Task Deliverable
Due Dates through to September 30, 2023, with the amended grant agreement reflecting a
twenty-five (25) month extension. The extension request by the County was necessary due to
the Sector 7 Beach and Dune Restoration Project being delayed on two occasions (construction
postponed in the 2020/2021 season and once again postponed in the 2021/2022 construction
season) due to lack of stakeholder support in the form of executed easement agreements
allowing for the placement of sand in accordance with design and permit constraints.
Construction for the Sector 7 project is now targeted to take place in the 2022/2023 construction
season should the County receive adequate easement agreements within the project area to
determine the project as constructible. The FDEP granted extension will allow time for this
project to complete and required deliverables submitted should construction take place in the
2022/2023 construction window.
The attached amendment maintains FDEP's commitment of up to $307,538.00 in funding to the
County for design and construction related expenses for the County's Sector 7 Beach and Dune
Restoration Project. Breakdown of funding is outlined in the below table.
Task #
Eligible
Project Task
DEP Cost
Share (%)
DEP Cost Share
Local Cost
Share
Total
Deliverable
Due Date
1
Monitoring
100.00%
$ 16,613.00
$ 0.00
$
16,613.00
09/30/2023
2
Design
100.00%
$ 290,925.00
$ 0.00
$
290,925.00
09/30/2023
Total
1
1 $ 307,538.00
$ 0.00
$
307,538.00
35
FUNDING
Funding for construction related activities for the Sector 7 Beach and Dune Restoration Project
will be programmed into the Fiscal Year 2022/2023 Budget.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends the Board approve FDEP Amendment No. 1 to FDEP LGFR Grant Agreement
No. 191R2 for up to $307,538.00 and authorize the Chairman to sign the Amendment on behalf
of the County. Following Board approval, the County will transmit the partially executed
Amendment to the State for final signatures. Upon receipt of the fully executed FDEP Grant
Agreement 191R2 Amendment No. 1 from the State, staff will transmit to the Clerk to the Board
of County Commissioners for filing.
ATTACHMENTS
1. Amendment No. 1 to FDEP Grant Agreement 191R2
APPROVED AGENDA ITEM FOR: October 19, 2021
36
AMENDMENT NO.1
TO AGREEMENT NO. 191R2
BETWEEN
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AND
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
This Amendment to Agreement No. 19IR2 (Agreement) is made by and between the Department of
Environmental Protection (Department), an agency of the State of Florida, and Indian River County, 1801 27`h Street,
Building A, Vero Beach, FL 32960 (Grantee), on the date last signed below.
WHEREAS, the Department entered into the Agreement with the Grantee for the Indian River County Hurricane
Irma Recovery Project effective July 22, 2019; and
WHEREAS, the parties wish to amend the Agreement as set forth herein; and
WHEREAS, the Federal Cost Share has been updated to 95% pursuant to the Federal Emergency Management
Agency Amendment number 18 to increase the federal reimbursement for Hurricane Irma (DR -4337 -FL); and
WHEREAS, the Grantee has requested additional time to complete the Project, and the Department has agreed.
NOW THEREFORE, the parties agree as follows:
1) The Agreement is extended for a 25 -month period to begin December 1, 2021, and remain in effect until December
31, 2023. The Department and the Grantee shall continue to perform their respective duties during this extension
period pursuant to the same terms and conditions provided in the Agreement.
2) Attachment 3, Grant Work Plan, is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced with Attachment 3-A, Revised Grant
Work Plan, as attached to this Amendment and hereby incorporated into the Agreement. All references in the
Agreement to Attachment 3 shall hereinafter refer to Attachment 3-A, Revised Grant Work Plan.
3) All other terms and conditions of the Agreement remain in effect. If and to the extent that any inconsistencies may
appear between the Agreement and this Amendment, the provisions of this Amendment shall control.
The parties agree to the terms and conditions of this Amendment and have duly authorized their respective representatives
to sign it on the dates indicated below.
Indian River County
By:
Chairman or Designee
Date:
Florida Department of Environmental Protection
By:
Secretary or Designee
Date:
LIST OF ATTACHMENTS/EXHIBITS INCLUDED AS PART OF THIS AMENDMENT:
Specify Type Letter/Number Description
Attachment 3-A Revised Grant Work Plan (3 pages)
- REMAINDER OF PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK -
37
ATTACHMENT 3-A
REVISED GRANT WORK PLAN
PROJECT TITLE: Indian River County Hurricane Irma Recovery Project
PROJECT LOCATION: The Project is located between Department of Environmental Protection
(Department or DEP) reference monuments R97 and R108 along the Atlantic Ocean in Indian River
County, Florida.
PROJECT BACKGROUND: Hurricane Irma made landfall on September 10, 2017 causing beach and
dune erosion along Indian River County. The 2018 Florida Legislature provided funds to assist counties
with beach and dune restoration projects. The Department developed the 2018 Hurricane Irma
Supplemental Funding Plan for Florida's beach and dune system to distribute these funds. Construction of
a storm recovery project is scheduled for 2022 to repair storm damages.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The Project consists of design and construction of the Indian River County
Hurricane Irma Recovery Project.
PROJECT ELIGIBILITY: The Department has determined that 100 percent of the non-federal Project
cost is eligible for state cost sharing. Therefore, the Department's financial obligation shall not exceed the
sum of $307,538.00 for this Project or up to 100 percent of the non-federal Project cost, if applicable, for
the specific eligible Project items listed, whichever is less. Any indicated federal cost sharing percentage is
an estimate and shall not affect the cost sharing percentages of the non-federal share. The parties agree that
eligibility for cost sharing purposes will be maintained pursuant to 62B-36, Florida Administrative Code
(F.A.C.).
The Local Sponsor will be responsible for auditing all travel reimbursement expenses based on the travel
limits established in Section 112.061, Florida Statute (F.S.).
Pursuant to Sections 161.091 - 161.i61, F.S., the Department provides financial assistance to eligible
governmental entities for beach erosion control and inlet management activities under the Florida Beach
Management Funding Assistance Program.
Pursuant to 62B -36.005(1)(d), F.A.C., the Local Sponsor has resolved to support and serve as local sponsor,
has demonstrated a financial commitment, and has demonstrated the ability to perform the tasks associated
with the beach erosion control project as described herein.
The Project shall be conducted in accordance with the terms and conditions set forth under this Agreement,
all applicable Department permits and the eligible Project task items established below. All data collection
and processing, and the resulting product deliverables, shall comply with the standards and technical
specifications contained in the Department's Monitoring Standards for Beach Erosion Control Projects
(2014) and all associated state and federal permits, unless otherwise specified in the approved scope of
work for an eligible Project item. The monitoring standards may be found at:
hUs://floridadel2. gov/sites/default/files/PhysicalMonitoringStandards.pdf
One (1) electronic copy of all written reports developed under this Agreement shall be forwarded to the
Department, unless otherwise specified.
Acronyms:
DEP — Florida Department of Environmental Protection
F.S. — Florida Statutes
F.A.C. — Florida Administrative Code
TASKS and DELIVERABLES:
The Local Sponsor will provide detailed scopes of work for all tasks identified below, which shall include
a narrative description of work to be completed, a corresponding cost estimate and a proposed schedule of
completion for the proposed work and associated deliverables. Each scope of work shall be approved in
writing by the DEP Project Manager to be included into this work plan for reimbursement.
Task 1: Design
Task Description: The Local Sponsor will acquire professional services for the engineering and design of
the Project such as coastal engineering analyses, preparation of plans and specifications, physical and
environmental surveys, cultural resource surveys, design -level geotechnical services, sediment studies, inlet
studies, environmental analyses, orthophotography, plan formulations and for obtaining environmental
permits and other Project -related authorizations. The Local Sponsor will submit work products to the
appropriate State or Federal regulatory agencies as requested by the DEP Project Manager in order to be
eligible for reimbursement under this task.
Deliverable: Certification of Completion including documentation of submittal affirming that the final
design document was completed and submitted to the Department. For interim payment requests, a Task
Summary Report signed by the Local Sponsor must be submitted detailing work progress during the
payment request period. The Task Summary Report must include the dates and descriptions of all activities,
surveys and reports completed or in progress during the time period of the interim payment request.
Performance Standard: The DEP Project Manager will review the task deliverable and any associated
work products as necessary to verify they meet the specifications in the Grant Work Plan and this task
description.
Payment Request Schedule: Payment requests may be submitted after the deliverable is received and
accepted and may be submitted no more frequently than quarterly.
Task 2: Construction
Task Description: This task includes work performed and costs incurred associated with the placement of
fill material and/or the construction of erosion control structures within the Project area. Project costs
associated with eligible beach and inlet construction activities include work approved through construction
bids and/or construction -phase engineering and monitoring services contracts. Eligible costs may include
mobilization, demobilization, construction observation or inspection services, physical and environmental
surveys, beach fill, tilling and scarp removal, erosion control structures, mitigation reefs, dune stabilization
measures and native beach -dune vegetation. Construction shall be conducted in accordance with any and
all State or Federal permits. The Local Sponsor will submit work products to the appropriate State or Federal
regulatory agencies as requested by the DEP Project Manager in order to be eligible for reimbursement
under this task.
Deliverable: Certification of Completion by a Florida -registered Professional Engineer with
documentation of submittal to the Department affirming the construction task was completed in accordance
with construction contract documents. For interim payment requests, a Task Summary Report must be
submitted detailing activities completed during the payment request period. The Task Summary Report
39
must include the dates and descriptions of all activities, surveys and reports completed or in progress during
the time period of the interim payment request.
Performance Standard: The DEP Project Manager will review the task deliverable and any associated
work products as necessary to verify they meet the specifications in the Grant Work Plan and this task
description.
Payment Request Schedule: Payment requests may be submitted after the deliverable is received and
accepted and may be submitted no more frequently than quarterly.
Estimated Eligible Project Cost
PROJECT TIMELINE & BUDGET DETAIL: The tasks must be completed by, and all deliverables
received by, the corresponding deliverable due date.
Task
No.
Task Title
State
Budget
Amount
Task
Start Date
Deliverable
Due Date
1
Design
Contractual Services
$16,613.00
Fe de ral
09/30/2023
2
Construction
Task #
Eligible Project
Cost
Estimated
DEP
Local
Total
Tasks
Share
Project Costs
1
Design
100.00%
$315,647.00
$16,613.00
$0.00
$332,260.00
2
Construction
100.00%
$5,527,575.00
$290,925.00
$0.00
$5,818,500.00
TOTAL
PROJECT
$5,843,222.00
$307,538.00
$0.00
$6,150,760.00
COSTS
PROJECT TIMELINE & BUDGET DETAIL: The tasks must be completed by, and all deliverables
received by, the corresponding deliverable due date.
Task
No.
Task Title
Budget Category
Budget
Amount
Task
Start Date
Deliverable
Due Date
1
Design
Contractual Services
$16,613.00
09/19/2017
09/30/2023
2
Construction
Contractual Services
$290,925.00
09/19/2017
09/30/2023
Total:
$307,538.00
40
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
MEMORANDUM
TO: Jason E. Brown, County Administrator
THROUGH: Richard B. Szpyrka, P.E., Public Works Director
James W. Ennis, P.E. PMP, Assistant Public Works Director
FROM: Michael L. Heller, Project Specialist
SUBJECT: Award of Bid No: 2022009
Jackie Robinson Training Complex Villas Remodel
IRC -1914A
DATE: October 8, 2021
DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS
On May 4, 2021, the Board of County Commissioners approved Work Order No. 3 for Edlund, Dritenbas,
Binkley and Associates, P.A. to provide design services for interior renovations and mold remediation to the
Jackie Robinson Training Complex Villas based on a Construction Assessment performed by Wood
Environmental & Infrastructure Solutions, Inc. in March 2021.
Following the completion of design for the renovation, the project was advertised and a bid opening was
held on September 30, 2021. Five (5) bids were received and opened for the project, three (3) bids were
rejected for being non-responsive. This resultec in two (2) qualified bids that were received. A detailed
tabulation of the bids is on file and available for viewing in the County Engineering Division. The two (2)
responsive bidders and their respective bids are as follows:
COMPANY
BID
Land Ron, Inc.
Orlando, FL.
$1,418,117.99 DQ
Gibraltar Construction Company, Inc.
Annapolis, MD.
$1,718,360.00
* Denotes mathematical errors on bid form were corrected.
During detailed review of the submitted bids by the Department, Land -Ron was noted to have failed to
provide unit pricing for all required items on the line item bid form, as required in the Instructions to Bidders
(14.01.A: "Bidders shall submit a Bid on a unit price basis for each item of Work listed in the Bid Schedule.").
The failure to provide unit pricing renders their bid non-responsive. Gibraltar Construction Company, Inc. is
considered to be the lowest, responsive, responsible bidderforthe project with a bid totaling $1,718,360.00.
Gibraltar Construction Company, Inc. is also considered to be the lowest, responsive, responsible bidderfor
Alternate Bid "A" (removal of popcorn ceilings) totaling $253,887.00for a total project cost of $1,972,247.00;
$167,852.50 less than the Engineer's Cost Estimate.
Upon review of their qualifications County Staff, in coordination with Edlund, Dritenbas, Binkley and
Associates, P.A. has determined that Gibraltar Construction Company, Inc. has successfully completed similar
construction projects.
41
Page 2
Award of Bid No: 2022009
Jackie Robinson Training Complex Villas Remodel
October 19, 2021 BCC Meeting
FUNDING
Funding in the amount of $1,972,247.00 is budgeted in Optional Sales Tax/Facilities Management/JRTC
Improvements/Account No. 31522019-066511-17003.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the total bid (including Alternate "A") in the amount of $1,972,247.00 be awarded to
Gibraltar Construction Company, Inc. Staff also recommends the Board of County Commissioners approve
the sample agreement and authorize the Chairman to execute said agreement after receipt and approval of
the required Certificate of Insurance bythe Risk Manager, confirmation of Gibraltar Construction Company,
Inc. enrollment in the e -verify database, and after the County Attorney has approved the Public Construction
Bond and agreement as to form and legal sufficiency.
ATTACHMENTS
Sample Agreement
APPROVED AGENDA ITEM FOR October 19, 2021
42
C:\Users\legistar\AppData\Local\Temp\BCL Technolo;ies\easyPDF 8\@BCL@4010C3B9\@BCL@4010C3B9.doc
Month xx, 2020 via Email
Company
A ttn:
Address
Address
Email address
SECTION 00520 - Agreement (Public Works)
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Title
Page
ARTICLE1 -WORK ........................................................................................................... 2
ARTICLE2 - THE PROJECT............................................................................................. 2
ARTICLE 3 - ENGINEER................................................................................................... 2
ARTICLE 4 - CONTRACT TIMES....................................................................................... 2
ARTICLE 5 - CONTRACT PRICE....................................................................................... 3
ARTICLE 6 - PAYMENT PROCEDURES........................................................................... 3
ARTICLE 7 - INDEMNIFICATION....................................................................................... 4
ARTICLE 8 - CONTRACTOR'S REPRESENTATIONS...................................................... 4
ARTICLE 9 - CONTRACT DOCUMENTS........................................................................... 6
ARTICLE 10 - MISCELLANEOUS...................................................................................... 7
[THE REMAINDER OF THIS PAGE WAS LEFT BLANK INTENTIONALLYI
Agreement (Public Works) REV 04-07 - 005203
C:.Users\ egistar\AppData\Local\Temp\BCL Technologies\easyPDF 8\@BCL@280D14F5\@BCL@280D14F5.docx
SECTION 00520 - Agreement (Public Works)
THIS AGREEMENT is by and between INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, a Political Subdivision of the
State of Florida organized and existing under the Laws of the State of Florida, (hereinafter called
OWNER)
and
(hereinafter called CONTRACTOR).
OWNER and CONTRACTOR, in consideration of the mutual covenants hereinafter set forth, agree
as follows:
ARTICLE 1 - WORK
1.01 CONTRACTOR shall complete all Work as specified or indicated in the Contract
Documents. The Work is generally described as follows:
Project consists of interior renovations to 57 existing hotel -style rooms located at
Jackie Robinson Training Complex. These renovations include the removal and
replacement of floor coverings, patching and selected replacement of dry wall ceilings,
removal of popcorn ceilings, the removal and replacement of front windows, HEPA
vacuum and clean all surfaces to rid space of mold. Project is also to include the removal
of existing HVAC duct work above the ceiling, and installation of new insulated, fire rated
attic access panels.
ARTICLE 2 - THE PROJECT
2.01 The Project for which the Work under the Contract Documents may be the whole or only a
part is generally described as follows:
Project Name: JACKIE ROBINSON TRAINING COMPLEX — VILLAS
REMODEL
County Project Number: IRC -1914A
Bid Number: 2022009
Project Address: 3901 26t1 St. Vero Beach, FL. 32960
ARTICLE 3 - ENGINEER
3.01 The Indian River County Public Works Department is hereinafter called the ENGINEER and
will act as OWNER's representative, assume all duties and responsibilities, and have the
rights and authority assigned to ENGINEER in the Contract Documents in connection with
the completion of the Work in accordance with the Contract Documents.
ARTICLE 4 - CONTRACT TIMES
4.01 Time of the Essence
A. All time limits for Milestones, if any, Substantial Completion, and completion and readiness
for final payment as stated in the Contract Documents are of the essence of the Contract.
4.02 Days to Achieve Substantial Completion, Final Completion and Final Payment
Agreement (Public Works) REV 04-07 - 005204
C:\Users\legislaM:)pData\Local\Temp\BCL Technologies\easyPDF 8\@BCL@280D14F5\@BCL@280D14F5.docx
A. The Work will be substantially completed on or before the 120 calendar day after the date
when the Contract Times commence to run as provided in paragraph 2.03 of the General
Conditions, and completed and ready for final payment in accordance with paragraph 14.07
of the General Conditions on or before the 150 calendar day after the date when the
Contract Times commence to run.
4.03 Liquidated Damages
A. CONTRACTOR and OWNER recognize that time is of the essence of this Agreement and
that OWNER will suffer financial loss if the Work is not completed within the times specified
in paragraph 4.02 above, plus any extensions thereof allowed in accordance with Article 12
of the General Conditions. Liquidated damages will commence for this portion of work. The
parties also recognize the delays, expense, and difficulties involved in proving in a legal
proceeding the actual loss suffered by OWNER if the Work is not completed on time.
Accordingly, instead of requiring any such proof, OWNER and CONTRACTOR agree that
as liquidated damages for delay (but not as a penalty), CONTRACTOR shall pay OWNER
$1,694.00 for each calendar day that expires after the time specified in paragraph 4.02 for
Substantial Completion until the Work is substantially complete. After Substantial
Completion, if CONTRACTOR shall neglect, refuse, or fail to complete the remaining Work
within the Contract Time or any proper extension thereof granted by OWNER,
CONTRACTOR shall pay OWNER $1,694.00 for each calendar day that expires after the
time specified in paragraph 4.02 for completion and readiness for final payment until the
Work is completed and ready for final payment.
ARTICLE 5 - CONTRACT PRICE
5.01 OWNER shall pay CONTRACTOR for completion of the Work in accordance with the
Contract Documents, an amount in current funds equal to the sum of the amounts
determined pursuant to paragraph 5.01.A and summarized in paragraph 5.01.13, below:
A. For all Work, at the prices stated in CONTRACTOR's Bid, attached hereto as an exhibit.
B. THE CONTRACT SUM subject to additions and deductions provided in the Contract:
Numerical Amount: $
Written Amount:
ARTICLE 6 - PAYMENT PROCEDURES
6.01 Submittal and Processing of Payments
A. CONTRACTOR shall submit Applications for Payment in accordance with Article
14 of the General Conditions. Applications for Payment will be processed by
ENGINEER as provided in the General Conditions and the Contract Documents.
Agreement (Public Works) REV 04-07 - 005245
Q\Users\legistarAppData\Local\Temp\BCL Technologies\easyPDF 8\@BCL@280D14F5\@BCL@280D14F5.docx
6.02 Progress Payments.
A. The OWNER shall make progress payments to the CONTRACTOR on the basis
of the approved partial payment request as recommended by ENGINEER in
accordance with the provisions of the Local Government Prompt Payment Act,
Florida Statutes section 218.70 et. seq. The OWNER shall retain five percent (5%)
of the payment amounts due to the CONTRACTOR until final completion and
acceptance of all work to be performed by CONTRACTOR under the Contract
Documents.
6.03 Pay Requests.
A. Each request for a progress payment shall be submitted on the application
provided by OWNER and the application for payment shall contain the
CONTRACTOR'S certification. All progress payments will be on the basis of
progress of the work measured by the schedule of values established, or in the
case of unit price work based on the number of units completed.
6.04 Paragraphs 6.02 and 6.03
do not apply to construction services work purchased by the County as OWNER which
are paid for, in whole or in part, with federal funds and are subject to federal grantor laws
and regulations or requirements that are contrary to any provision of the Local
Government Prompt Payment Act. In such event, payment and retainage provisions shall
be governed by the applicable grant requirements and guidelines.
6.05 Acceptance of Final Payment as Re!ease.
A. The acceptance by the CONTRACTOR of final payment shall be and shall operate
as a release to the OWNER from all claims and all liability to the CONTRACTOR
other than claims in stated amounts as may be specifically excepted by the
CONTRACTOR for all things done or furnished in connection with the work under
this Contract and for every act and neglect of the OWNER and others relating to
or arising out of the work. Any payment, however, final or otherwise, shall not
release the CONTRACTOR or its sureties from any obligations under the Contract
Documents or the Public Construction Bond.
ARTICLE 7 - INDEMNIFICATION
7.01 CONTRACTOR shall indemnify OWNER, ENGINEER, and others in accordance with
paragraph 6.20 (Indemnification) of the General Conditions to the Construction Contract.
ARTICLE 8 - CONTRACTOR'S REPRESENTATIONS
8.01 In order to induce OWNER to enter nto this Agreement CONTRACTOR makes the
following representations:
A. CONTRACTOR has examined and carefully studied the Contract Documents and the other
related data identified in the Bidding Documents.
Agreement (Public Works) REV 04-07 - 00520
C:WsersVegistarV,ppData\Local\Temp\BCL Technologies\easyPDF 8\@BCL@280D14F5\@BCL@280D14F5.docx
B. CONTRACTOR has visited the Site and become familiar with and is satisfied as to the
general, local, and Site conditions that may affect cost, progress, and performance of the
Work.
C. CONTRACTOR is familiar with and is satisfied as to all federal, state, and local Laws and
Regulations that may affect cost, progress, and performance of the Work.
D. CONTRACTOR has carefully studied all: (1) reports of explorations and tests of subsurface
conditions at or contiguous to the Site and all drawings of physical conditions in or relating
to existing surface or subsurface structures at or contiguous to the Site (except Underground
Facilities) which have been identified in the Supplementary Conditions as provided in
paragraph 4.02 of the General Conditions and (2) reports and drawings of a Hazardous
Environmental Condition, if any, at the Site which have been identified in the Supplementary
Conditions as provided in paragraph 4.06 of the General Conditions.
E. CONTRACTOR has obtained and carefully studied (or assumes responsibility for having
done so) all additional or supplementary examinations, investigations, explorations, tests,
studies, and data concerning conditions (surface, subsurface, and Underground Facilities)
at or contiguous to the Site which may affect cost, progress, or performance of the Work or
which relate to any aspect of the means, methods, techniques, sequences, and procedures
of construction to be employed by CONTRACTOR, including applying the specific means,
methods, techniques, sequences, and procedures of construction, if any, expressly required
by the Contract Documents to be employed by CONTRACTOR, and safety precautions and
programs incident thereto
F. CONTRACTOR does not consider that any further examinations, investigations,
explorations, tests, studies, or data are necessary for the performance of the Work at the
Contract Price, within the Contract Times, and in accordance with the other terms and
conditions of the Contract Documents.
G. CONTRACTOR is aware of the general nature of work to be performed by OWNER and
others at the Site that relates to the Work as indicated in the Contract Documents.
H. CONTRACTOR has correlated the information known to CONTRACTOR, information and
observations obtained from visits to the Site, reports and drawings identified in the Contract
Documents, and all additional examinations, investigations, explorations, tests, studies, and
data with the Contract Documents.
I. CONTRACTOR has given ENGINEER written notice of all conflicts, errors, ambiguities, or
discrepancies that CONTRACTOR has discovered in the Contract Documents, and the
written resolution thereof by ENGINEER is acceptable to CONTRACTOR.
J. The Contract Documents are generally sufficient to indicate and convey understanding of
all terms and conditions for performance and furnishing of the Work.
K. Contractor is registered with and will use the Department of Homeland Security's E -Verify
system (www.e-verify.clov) to confirm the employment eligibility of all newly hired employees
for the duration of this agreement, as required by Section 448.095, F.S. Contractor is also
responsible for obtaining proof of E -Verify registration for all subcontractors.
Agreement (Public Works) REV 04-07 - 005241
C:'.UsersVegistarAppData\Local\Temp\BCL TechnologiWeasyPDF 8\@BCL@280D14F5\@BCL@280D14F5.docx
ARTICLE 9 - CONTRACT DOCUMENTS
9.01 Contents
A. The Contract Documents consist of the following:
1. This Agreement (pages 00520-1 to 00520-9, inclusive);
2. Notice to Proceed (page 00550-1);
3. Public Construction Bond (pages 00610-1 to 00610-3, inclusive);
4. Sample Certificate of Liability Insurance (page 00620-1);
5. Contractor's Application for Payment (pages 00622-1 to 00622-6 inclusive);
6. Certificate of Substantial Completion ( pages 00630-1 to 00630-2, inclusive);
7. Contractor's Final Certification of the Work (pages 00632-1 to 00632-2, inclusive);
8. Professional Surveyor & Mapper's Certification as to Elevations and Locations of the
Work (page 00634-1
9. General Conditions (pages 00700-1 to 00700-37, inclusive);
10. Supplementary Conditions (pages 00800-i to 00800-12, inclusive);
11. Specifications as listed in Division 1 (General Requirements) and Division 2 (Technical
Provisions);
12. Drawings consisting of a cover sheet and sheets numbered AA=1 through EE=3, inclusive,
with each sheet bearing the following general title: JACKIE ROBINSON TRAINING
COMPLEX —VILLAS REMODEL;
13. Addenda (if applicable );
14. Appendices to this Agreement (enumerated as follows):
Appendix A— Permits (IRC Building Permit)
Appendix B — Mold Remediation Protocol — by Wood Environment and Infrastructure
Solutions, Inc.
Appendix C — Asbestos Survey
15. CONTRACTOR'S BID (pages 00310-1 to 00310-8, inclusive);
16. Bid Bond (page 00430-1
17. Qualifications Questionnaire (page 00456-1 to 00456-3, inclusive);
18. List of Subcontractors (page 00458-1);
19. Sworn Statement Under Section 105.08, Indian River County Code, on Disclosure of
Relationships (pages 00452-1 to 00452-2, inclusive);
Agreement (Public Works) REV 04-07 - 005248
C:\Users\IegistaMppData\Local\Temp\BCL Technologies\easyPDF 8\@BCL@280D14F5\@BCL@280D14F5.docx
20. Certification Regarding Prohibition Against Contracting with Scrutinized Companies
(page 00460-1);
21. The following which may be delivered or issued on or after the Effective Date of the
Agreement and are not attached hereto:
a) Written Amendments;
b) Work Change Directives;
c) Change Order(s);
ARTICLE 10 - MISCELLANEOUS
10.01 Terms
A. Terms used in this Agreement will have the meanings indicated in the General Conditions.
10.02 Assignment of Contract
A. No assignment by a party hereto of any rights under or interests in the Contract will be
binding on another party hereto without the written consent of the party sought to be bound;
and, specifically but without limitation, moneys that may become due and moneys that are
due may not be assigned without such consent (except to the extent that the effect of this
restriction may be limited by law), and unless specifically stated to the contrary in any written
consent to an assignment, no assignment will release or discharge the assignor from any
duty or responsibility under the Contract Documents.
10.03 Successors and Assigns
A. OWNER and CONTRACTOR each binds itself, its partners, successors, assigns, and legal
representatives to the other party hereto, its partners, successors, assigns, and legal
representatives in respect to all covenants, agreements, and obligations contained in the
Contract Documents.
10.04 Severability
A. Any provision or part of the Contract Documents held to be void or unenforceable under any
Law or Regulation shall be deemed stricken, and all remaining provisions shall continue to
be valid and binding upon OWNER and CONTRACTOR, who agree that the Contract
Documents shall be reformed to replace such stricken provision or part thereof with a valid
and enforceable provision that comes as close as possible to expressing the intention of the
stricken provision.
10.05 Venue
A. This Contract shall be governed by the laws of the State of Florida. Venue for any lawsuit
brought by either party against the other party or otherwise arising out of this Contract shall
be in Indian River County, Florida, or, in the event of a federal jurisdiction, in the United
States District Court for the Southern District of Florida.
Agreement (Public Works) REV 04-07 - 005209
C1UsersVegistar\4ppData\Local\Temp\BCL Technologies\easyPDF 8\@BCL@280D14F5\@BCL@280D14F5.docx
10.06 Public Records Compliance
A. Indian River County is a public agency subject to Chapter 119, Florida Statutes. The
Contractor shall comply with Florida's Public Records Law. Specifically, the Contractor
shall:
(1) Keep and maintain public records required by the County to perform the service.
(2) Upon request from the County's Custodian of Public Records, provide the County with a
copy of the requested records or allow the records to be inspected or copied within a
reasonable time at a cost that does not exceed the cost provided in Chapter 119 or as
otherwise provided by law.
(3) Ensure that public records that are exempt or confidential and exempt from public
records disclosure requirements are not disclosed except as authorized bylaw for the duration
of the contract term and following completion of the contract if the contractor does not transfer
the records to the County.
(4) Upon completion of the contract, transfer, at no cost, to the County all public records in
possession of the Contractor or keep and maintain public records required by the County to
perform the service. If the Contractor transfers all public records to the County upon
completion of the contract, the Contractor shall destroy any duplicate public records that are
exempt or confidential and exempt from public records disclosure requirements. If the
contractor keeps and maintains public records upon completion of the contract, the Contractor
shall meet all applicable requirements for retaining public records. All records stored
electronically must be provided to the County, upon request from the Custodian of Public
Records, in a format that is compatible with the information technology systems of the County.
B. IF THE CONTRACTOR HAS QUESTIONS REGARDING THE
APPLICATION OF CHAPTER 119, FLORIDA STATUTES, TO THE
CONTRACTOR'S DUTY TO PROVIDE PUBLIC RECORDS RELATING
TO THIS CONTRACT, CONTACT THE CUSTODIAN OF PUBLIC
RECORDS AT:
(772) 226-1424
publicrecords(a-ircgov.com
Indian River County Office of the County Attorney
180127 th Street
Vero Beach, FL 32960
C. Failure of the Contractor to comply with these requirements shall be a material breach of
this Agreement.
[The remainder of this page was left blank intentionally]
Agreement (Public Works) REV 04-07 - 00520
C:\Userslegistar,AppData\Local\Temp\BCL Technologies\easyPDF 8\@BCL@280D14F5\@BCL@280D14F5.docx
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, OWNER and CONTRACTOR have signed this Agreement in duplicate.
One counterpart each has been delivered to OWNER and CONTRACTOR. All portions of the
Contract Documents have been signed or identified by OWNER and CONTRACTOR or on their
behalf.
This Agreement will be effective on , 2021 (the date the Contract is approved by
the Indian River County Board of County Commissioners, which is the Effective Date of the
Agreement).
OWNER:
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
0
1A
Joseph E. Flescher, Chairman
Jason E. Brown, County Administrator
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGAL
SUFFICIENCY:
By:
Dylan Reingold, County Attorney
Jeffrey R. Smith, Clerk of Court and Comptroller
Attest:
Deputy Clerk
(SEAL)
Designated Representative:
Name: James W. Ennis, P.E., PMP
Title: Assistant Public Works Director
1801 27th Street
Vero Beach, Florida 32960
(772) 226-1221
Facsimile: (772) 778-9391
CONTRACTOR:
By:
(Contractor)
(CORPORATE SEAL)
Attest
Address for giving notices:
License No.
(Where applicable)
Agent for service of process:
Designated Representative:
Name:
Title:
Address:
Phone:
Facsimile:
(If CONTRACTOR is a corporation or a
partnership, attach evidence of authority to sign.)
* * END OF SECTION * *
Agreement (Public Works) REV 04-07 - 0052(51)
C:\Users\legis'ar\NppData\Local\Temp\BCL Technologies\easyPDF 8\@BCL@280D14F5\@BCL@280014F5.docx
@BCL@280D14F5.docx - 0063fa
C:\Users\Iegistar\AppData\Local\Temp\BCL Technologies\easyPDF 8\@BCL@280D14F5\@BCL@280D14F5.docx
Dylan Reingold, County Attorney
William K DeBraal, Deputy County Attorney
Susan J. Prado, Assistant County Attorney
Office of
INDIAN
MEMORANDUM
TO: Board of County Commissioners
FROM: Dylan Reingold, County Attorney
DATE: October 13, 2021
IJAI
Public Hearing - B.C.C. 10. 19.21
RIVER COUNTY
ATTORNEY
SUBJECT: Public Hearing and Discussion of 2021 Redistricting of County Commissioner
Districts
BACKGROUND.
The United States Census Bureau has completed the 2020 decennial census, and has released the new
census information. This has triggered a responsibility of the Board of County Commissioners to review
the commissioner districts in light of the census data, and to make changes required by law. Specifically,
(1) article VIII, section (1)(e) of the Florida Constitution provides that "after each decennial census the
board of county commissioners shall divide the county into districts of contiguous territory as nearly equal
in population as practicable," and (2) section 124.01, Florida Statutes provides that "there shall be five
county commissioners' districts in each county, which shall be numbered one to five, inclusive, and shall
be as nearly equal in proportion to population as possible." Section 124.01 goes on to say that changes in
county commissioner districts "shall be made only in odd -numbered years."
At the July 13, 2021 meeting, the Board held its first discussion of the redistricting process. A schedule
was adopted which called for additional public hearings, tentatively scheduled for August 17, October 19,
and December 7 (for final adoption). On August 17, 2021, the Board adopted a 2021 Redistricting Plan
which set forth criteria to be followed by staff in preparing redistricting proposals, and incorporated the
public hearing schedule.
CAU YegWs WppDa iLwaUempOCL Techwlogiesl..yPDF81@BCL@44135AECI@BCL@44135AECd
53
Board of County Commissioners
October 13, 2021
Page Two
The following criteria were adopted by the Board:
1) Districts shall be as nearly equal in population as possible with final population figures not
exceeding a deviation of 6% between the largest and the smallest district, and not exceeding a
deviation of 3% between any district and the "ideal population" (defined as the total population of
the County divided by five).
2) Districts shall be compact, rather than sprawling.
3) Districts shall be contiguous — that is, no portion of a district shall be geographically separate and
apart from the rest of the district.
4) Respect for Existing Districts, with current commissioners being maintained in their current
districts.
5) Neighborhoods and other communities of interest shall be included within a single district, rather
than split among two or more districts.
6) Districts shall follow major natural or man-made boundaries — e.g., major roads, rivers, bridges,
canals, etc.
7) Districts shall follow United States Census Bureau blocks.
8) No district shall be drawn to split or minimize the political influence of any group of residents.
The County GIS Division, primarily through the efforts of Paige Lester, GIS Analyst, using the criteria set
forth in the 2021 Redistricting Plan, has developed three redistricting proposals. Each of the proposals is
attached. Copies of the proposed maps have been posted at the Main Library and the North County
Library, and on the County's website and the Supervisor of Elections website. Copies have also been
provided to the five municipalities within the County, the School Board and to Senator Debbie Mayfield
and Representative Erin Grall. The County Attorney believes that all three proposals meet the
requirements of the law and the criteria established by the Board.
FUNDING.
There are no funding requirements.
RECOMMENDATION.
County staff recommends that the Chairman open the public hearing, take public input, and close the
public hearing, and that the Board then discuss the proposals and provide initial feedback to staff, so that
staff can move forward toward the preparation and submittal of a final proposal for adoption on December
7th
ATTACHMENTS.
Proposed (# 1, 2 and 3) Redistricting Maps
C:IU rsllegistarLlppD=iLocaATemp1BCL TecMologiuleayPDF81QBCL@44/35AECI(gBCLQa4413SAECdoc
54
w
S ZEN •
`a r'
a i
I .,rte., rte.• 1 c 1
:)
Im
1 y �' ♦s Fsr3s gg �� _.��
noaEv+apD _
1 L �
1
r 1
1
1
1
1
O W i j `------
� of I I
O ✓� ��
� m 1
C/)
oU _
OZ _
0.
O O OJ --- e -----------------J
�in'l \, 1
d fA >- 1
A d
'E
fr=
g a'g
w
C7 o m a
N ,n a ,np'x2
o
'o
F—O
O U
1
v�
W
I7 \
C O�$gE8
O O
g38S
a. (L
�3nda
w
S ZEN •
`a r'
a i
I .,rte., rte.• 1 c 1
:)
Im
1 y �' ♦s Fsr3s gg �� _.��
noaEv+apD _
1 L �
1
r 1
1
1
1
1
O W i j `------
� of I I
O ✓� ��
� m 1
C/)
oU _
OZ _
0.
O O OJ --- e -----------------J
�in'l \, 1
d fA >- 1
Z
1
o
'o
F—O
1
v�
1111111
o >
1
I HS
m
F-
1
1
oa
t o
i
Q Q
1
5
go
W X
_
O� W Z
1
0„
1
a°�
Z �
i
------------------A1NlICD
tl103�i0 a '_ 1 -'-�-
1111111
I HS
m
1
1
1
1
1 —
/r�/ 1
1 Jo
1
m
1
l�
1
a zv
O
eg`ug
Z
H
U
1
>t
F- O
F-
1
w
3qE
N to
1
o
o0
>
� ❑
�
`
CD
O m 8
m
OW
a. Z Oe
rn�
52 1
w cn LL
E
a
y 2 . c
a N w
w y
Ei
U U U U fl8 i�
WO U
O 0 CL
i
a C
�90
r. -- 704 .1
`
1 "
1
1
1
1
1 —
/r�/ 1
1 Jo
1
W
Z
1
l�
1
a zv
O
Z
H
U
1
>t
F- O
F-
1
w
3qE
N to
1
o
o0
>
� ❑
�
`
1
OW
a. Z Oe
-
52 1
w cn LL
1 r------------------1
a cn >
1
a zv
Z
1
F- O
�
1
3qE
Ur
OQoq
>
fly€
1
Z
-
as
N F- Z
i
Ei
LU X
fY W Z
i a
i
Q"""
�90
r. -- 704 .1
`
1 "
A1NfIJJ _ 1i
tll03JS0
in
�
3qE
Ur
OQoq
fly€
N
-
as
i a
�90
0 0
yC�
ae
L
� . .
\ % !
0
W-offla;
� W
«
\ 2
\| ||
GH
§�\
�
O
Z�
§
{
o Im
t§i
0
.
/ 2 E
k
§/!
m E z
m <
Cl) Cl)'
\-
\) !
w w
�p
$
,
z
LU 0
:
L
� . .
\ % !
0
W-offla;
� W
«
\ 2
\| ||
.
z §
O
Z�
S w
o Im
Q w
.
/ 2 E
k
| `
m E z
m <
Cl) Cl)'
\-
\) !
w w
�p
$
,
z
LU 0
:
.
a §
,-
-
9
a.
-----------------
��& .!
cn
o z
-
»
z §
|
!
S w
|
\k
Q w
/ 2 E
|
%
m E z
m <
|
\-
w w
z
»
:
.
° z
-- --.---
,-
------------------'
� � %-
}�
\!
�
10/19/2021 10.A.1.
2021 Redistricting of County
Commissioner Districts
Indian River County
Board of County Commissioners
October 2021
\\
OR19
51- 1
10/19/2021 10.A.1.
1 2021 Redistricting Criteria I
'51- 2
10/19/2021 10.A.1.
What is a Census Block?
• Statistical areas delineated by the U.S. Census
Bureau once every ten years.
• In a city, a census block looks like a city block
bounded on all sides by streets.
• In suburban and rural areas, they may be large,
irregular, and bounded by a variety of features, such
as roads, streams, and transmission lines.
51' 3
Example of 2020 Census Blocks
in Sebastian area
w2i1 //
� x
x ma ieT'i u
n '
DIS ICT
3a s
p
f ' a
a
l- ll
a..............
w
s •E
a ' Y
a SEBASTIAN i
Population
Per Block
10/19/2021 10.A.1.
What is a Census Designated Place?
• CDPs are statistical geographic entities
representing closely settled, unincorporated
communities that are locally recognized and
identified by name.
ASr ....1tasT Hs G
Vero Lain '- a Offord
[states4-1 Sr Sr
i i t d
r ...
51 4
10/19/2021 10.A.1.
Existing County Commissioner Districts
EXISTING COUNTY COMMISSIONER DISTRICT ...�<..e
BOUNDARIES, 2021 ,♦♦ .n ��,„e,,,,,
INORN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA u..vtr
�- -
F i F -t ♦
•
\ 1 I
1- 5
10/19/2021 10.A_ 1.
g i- 6
Example: Updated CDP
(Census Designated Place)
E.
i � QAC
i((i � •, 9
t
WabM l
1 't
2010
[Wabasso CDP
- w
t-• ��
sp
t �
t Wsbass0 •s
..........t
1
E2020
basso CDP
Ten years of Subdivision Development
Pq
Subdivisions are considered
`communities of interest' and must be
considered in the redistricting process.
10/19/2021 10.A.1.
/ Subdivisions in 2010
--! Subdivision Development
. �sinee 2010
51-
10/19/2021 10.A.1.
Redistricting Proposal 1
REDISTRICTING PROPOSAL 1 ,r-
f PROPOSED COMMISSIONER DISTRICT BOUNDARIES
r. INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
.. i`\�
/ >'
w.
-+ •..4iSTRtCf +
_ I
1
� t
\ \ 1
1
t
.-5.-�----..w T l t
i41,
� Db'FRS('i
.y .
.... � .UCT_... {Y 1
------�----------------------------- ----------- --------
10/19/2021 10.A.1.
Proposal 1
Comparison to Existing Districts
REDISTRICTING PROPOSAL I WlTN 04ERLAY OF Y ----'
EXISTING COMMISSIONER DISTRICT BOUNDARIES
INDIAN RWER COUNTY. FLORIDA
"v ,.
Dl
§�- 9
• Create a scenario that stays as close as
possible to the current districts while meeting
all of the criteria.
• Incorporate the newly updated CDPs for
Wabasso, Gifford, and Vero Lake Estates
• Focus on compact district shapes
• Square off the west corner of District 2 to
mitigate split Census Block
10/19/2021 10.A.1.
Redistricting Proposal 2
REOISTRICTING PROPOSAL 2 .� .•aa.c E�<
:kPROPOSED COMMISSIONER DISTRICT BOUNDARIES ..•,. I"°°"'� tea.,
INDIAN RIVER COVNTY, FLORIDA
t — '
ryr�lcr,
i a a��+ 1 DISTIDi7 -"—
�
t
I }
y t
Proposal 2
Comparison to Existing Districts
REDISTRICTING PROPOSAL 2 MTN OVZRLAY OF
EXISTING COMMISSIONER DISTRICT BOUNDARIES
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, :LOM-- FLORIDA
D3 -.-
1
ProposedCommissioner
Populationby Deviationfrom
\`�
i
District
N aw swrw.
hawwMrtm
from Average
I
1
I
53
'
2
ti
I
0.62% i
3
31,947
D3
10/19/2021 10.A.1.
hl�
04
---------------—.—
s j
Population Counts for Redistricting Proposal 2
ProposedCommissioner
Populationby Deviationfrom
\`�
,
Percent Deviation,,
District
N aw swrw.
hawwMrtm
from Average
I
1
32,01'
53
0.17°I° i
2
ti
199
0.62% i
3
31,947
-11
i
-0.03°l0 i
4
32,019
61
i
0.19°l0 i
5
t t.
-304
-0.95°l0
i
Total County
i
Population
159,788
fD5
- - - - - -
Average
"Ideal" Population
.....
Population varies from the Average from +0.6% to -1 °/D
hl�
04
---------------—.—
s j
Population Counts for Redistricting Proposal 2
ProposedCommissioner
Populationby Deviationfrom
,
Percent Deviation,,
District
District Average
from Average
I
1
32,01'
53
0.17°I° i
2
32,157
199
0.62% i
3
31,947
-11
i
-0.03°l0 i
4
32,019
61
i
0.19°l0 i
5
31,654
-304
-0.95°l0
i
Total County
i
Population
159,788
- - - - - -
Average
"Ideal" Population
31,958
Population varies from the Average from +0.6% to -1 °/D
5 I ,
12
Key Considerations : Proposal 2
• Create a scenario that attempts to improve
upon Proposal 1, mainly by bringing district
populations closer to the average.
• Incorporate the newly updated CDPs for
Wabasso, Gifford, and Vero Lake Estates.
• Focus on reducing the population variance
between the districts.
Key Considerations : Proposal 2
North County:, >
arao ;.
Fairly close to
existing districts
i
10/19/2021 10.A.1.
5q, 13
1
{
I
j
i
10/19/2021 10.A.1.
5q, 13
10/19/2021 10.A.1.
Key Considerations : Proposal 2
�+ South County:
Significant shift
D5
3 •Kr
w
1
`n •
1 +
1 •
•���1�� ��5���------ — -----k -----al--
Redistricting Proposal 3
REDISTRICTING PROPOSAL 3
PROPOSED COMMISSIONER DISTRICT BOUNDARIES
' INDIANRWER COUNTY, FLORIDA
DUM
--------------
11 IL
f
1 £T I I
i
I r:
1 _
� ♦ cn c
� 5 S
T
I
I DIS: RIFT
1_ s i T��• i
y---------------- -------------------------- --------- s ----
5q' 14
10/19/2021 10.A.1.
Proposal 3
Comparison to Existing Districts
r REDISTRICTING PROPOSAL? WITH OVERLAY OF .r -----, 2
EXISTING COMMISSIONER DISTRICT BOUNDARIES
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
......... . ..
h kl
i_
� D3
: an _
r
Population Counts for Redistricting Proposal 3
Proposed
Population by Deviation
from Percent
41 1I
Deviation
Commissioner
District
District Average
from
Average 1
1
32,014
56
0.2%
I
I
32,043
$5
0.3%
I
31,825
-133
-0.4%
4
I
I
$5
-95
0.3%
-0.3%
5
Total County
1
I
Population
159,788
I
I
_ _ _ _
Average
I
"Ideal" Population
31,958
Population varies from the Average from +0.3°/D
51.15
1
32,014
56
0.2%
2
32,043
$5
0.3%
3
31,825
-133
-0.4%
4
32,043
31,$63
$5
-95
0.3%
-0.3%
5
Total County
Population
159,788
` _ _
_ _ _ _
Average
"Ideal" Population
31,958
Population varies from the Average from +0.3°/D
51.15
10/19/2021 10.A.1.
Key Considerations : Proposal 3
�1- 16
10/19/2021 10.A.1.
Questions...
Indian River County
Information Technology Department
GIS Division
51- 17
151 - %
m
1
Y V
1
'0 WMA
a„s'Ot
jaiap
i. a
4
i
' a i
I
LL oW
Ct z� ---,
uu , y !
N UA '
f M w
U) W 0 M
�Z 1
00 of ------------------ I
Z E O
O
1
9�n
F-
8
�U
w
{L >
'
,
g
M
~zcr
;
C f- z
w/�/� X,`,,
LL W ?
°-------------------
— - - - - — - - — — ------
aC6
H
9�n
ill14
I
C)
z
p m e/
Cl)
o W
(L Z
00
ix U) U-
a- U) >:
Z =01
0 0
w
VUR
z >
U)
Ei
w X 0
w w z
--------------
m
oil
i�
oil
ja-j9 ?
Southern Christian Leadership Conference
Indian River County Chapter
5835 59th Court, Vero Beach, FL 32967
Anthony Stewart, President
October 19, 2021
Chairman Joe Flescher and
Board of County Commissioners
1801 27th Street
Vero Beach, Florida 32960
Re: County Commissioner's Meeting on Redistricting
Dear Commissioner Flescher,
On January 22, 2021, we the Southern Christian Leadership Conference Chapter of Indian River
County submitted a letter to Chairman Flescher expressing a need for Single Member districting.
We reminded him of our letters dated August 19, 2020 and August 27, 2020 where we requested
redistricting maps dating from 1960 through 2010. Your office responded in writing that this
data was none existing. Yet we requested copies of the minutes from the same time period and
you provided the information. Each redistricting period, reference colored maps that outlined
the five county districts. These maps must be a part of official county records, just as the maps
you are circulating now.
Your failure to provide a public records request is a violation of our rights just as your At Large
Voting system has violated our rights since 1965. Pursuant to Section 2 and 12(d) of the Voting
Rights Acts of 1965, as amended, 42 USC Statute 1973 and 42 USC Statute 1973 j(d). We
challenge the At Large method of electing Indian River County Commissioners on the grounds
that it dilutes the voting strength of black citizens in violation of Section 2. Racially polarize
voting patterns prevail in elections in this county. No black candidate for the office of County
Commissioner has ever won an election since Indian River County was formed in 1925. Short of
Single Member District voting and drawing a District map that will insure blacks an opportunity
to elect one of their own is more of the same and unacceptable.
ank y4"te
his o
(:thont
President
Southern Christian Leadership Conference
Indian River County
/AS
xe: luounty Commissioner District Maps
Dear Sir/Madam:
This letter serves as a public records request in obtaining copies of the county
commissioner's district maps as well as the determining factors that constitute a "district." I am
requesting this information be provided dating back from 1960 to the present.
1 understand this request comes at a cost and according to Florida Statute 119.07 (9)(4)(a)
I am willing to pay .15 per single page and .20 for double sided copies. It is understandable if
there are extra fees as it relates to distr iet maps.
Your prompt acknowledgement and response is appreciated.
Sincerely,
Anthony G tewart
President, CLC
Indian River County
/AS
Soutmn Chriom Leadership
Indian RtWr County
Rev. Anthony a Stewart
President
—Jq '2.1
5'1.Z2--
Indian Riper County Chapter
SS35 59th Court Vera Beach, Ff 32957
lu�k?ust i, Lt1Lt1
L,UIIIIIII351C3nCr.ii)� i'it,;1Llic;r
Countv Commissioner's Officer
ISO 1 ??th Street
Fero i3eaci., rioriva 3296
Re: County Commissioner District. Maps
i_iear Commissioner f etcher:
RECEFVE
A}t:' :�, i� }
..iUU N (
int}: RD OF COUNTY
CONNI RF5sto'4
7t7tJl(tPd1 ` .)fC°l4 (ft't. I`n- S'ItIC'i7t
Tris is a follow- up to correspondence hand delivered to your Administrative Assistant
i ateti r iIVust i t. %u2v. We are requesting a uaic: N e can picktip or expeci tip receive copies of
the county commissioner's district maps and be given the determining factors that constitute a
"district."
As previouNiv stated, I unucrstunu itlis recluesi t.'QMeN at a gust anu accorui cr to r'iorwiL
Statute: 119.07 (9)(4)(a) I am willing to pay . 3 5 per single page and .2'0 for double sided Copies. It
is understandat3me it them are extra toes as it reiates to district maps.
Your prompt acknowledgement and response is appreciated.
indlan timer C'ounly
5123
i
E dian River County Chapter
5835 59th Court, Vero Beach, FL 32967
January 22, 2021
Chairman of the Board
Commissioner Joe Fletcher
1801 27th Street
Vero Beach, Florida 32960
Anthony Ste vvart
President
Re: SINGLE NVWMBER DISTRICT VOTING FOR ALL CITIZENS OF GIFFORD
Dear Commissioner Fletcher:
Congratulations on your Chairmanship for the second time. I hope the New Year find
you and your family in good health and spirit.
We the Southern Christian Leadership Conference of Indian River County, on August 19,
2020 and August 27, 2020, requested in writing, District Maps from your office as well as the
determining factor used to draw the District lines. We believe that this information would have
been beneficial in compiling historical data for the Gifford community. This request was to date
back to 1960. Unfortunately, according to your office, this data was not available. (Please see
attachments).
We are now requesting that you and your colleagues agree to vote for a single member
district, since it has become apparent we will never be afforded the opportunity to elect our
representatives. Many of our prominent citizens have become frustrated and discouraged from a
lack of same race representation. They express feelings of helplessness and incapability.
Unfortunately, this feeling for many years has been transmitted to our off springs and served as a
streamline from the school house to the jail house (as evident in the 54 year old Desegregation
Order that the School Board is presently litigating). We know taxation without representation is
tyranny. Having a same race representative could prove beneficial in providing role models for
our youth and assurance for our citizens that we have a place at the table other than on the menu
or serving the table. This county has a long history of excluding blacks from its decision making
processes, omitting and neglecting their needs (racism). There is much data to support these
allegations that the county itself has provided. Recently, the world has witnessed the true color
5 I - Zai
of America and this county personifies that color to the fullness. For the sake of our children and
citizens, it's time for a change. Taxation without representation is tyranny.
Commissioner Fletcher after traveling 9,358 miles one way on two separate occasions to
fight an undeclared dear in South Vietnam in defense of a more democratic form of life for a
country I called "my country" (America). I now pits- my ignorance for never experiencing a
democratic life myself. The seventy one years I've lived in Indian River County Inas been the
most oppressive and inequitable experience imaginable. I too, as Nathan Hale, felt that my "only
regret, is that I have but one life to lose for my country.- My father was military, my brother was
military, my son retired after 28 years in the U.S. Army and man,- of our black citizens served.
bled and died for this cause. Yet none of us even experienced the feeling of living in a
democra6- govenuncrt in dlis_ count E_y because of the- sophisticated Jim Crow ps-`en& democ`M
of this county. We as black citizens deserve better! Many blacks shed their blood and some gave
their life. All gave some but some gave all. It does not take a rocket scientist to see the distinct
inequalities that exist between the blacks and whites of this county. Just look at Gifford and
Orchid Island being in the same district. Or better yet, look across US Highway One to Grand
Harbor, across the river to John's Island, even Stevie Wonder can see the difference in the
infrastructure_ It's time for change- The world is looking and so are aye.
Currently the voter suppression and gerrymandering tactics, prevents us from electing a
same race representative. Let's work on a real genuine solution to this problem that has existed
forever. A single member district voting would give so little but mean so much.
Your attention, assistance and a written response to this matter would be appreciated.
Sincerely,
Anthony -Stewart
President of SCLC of Indian River County
L'W/as
attachments
cc: Florida State Representative Erin Grail
Florida State Senate Debbie Mayfield
Florida State Senate Bobby Powell
51-25
4MIC
Southern Christian _.t:: 3 --rs ; i-r Conference
Indian River County Chapter
5835 59th Court, Vero Beach, FL 32967
Anthony Stewart, President
September 1, 2021
Joe Flescher, Chairman
Board of County Commissioners
County Commissioner's Office
1801 27th Street
Vero Beach, Florida 32960
Re: Our Proposal to Rectify
Dear Commissioner Flescher,
1. Redistrict the County by providing a district to insure black representation. See attached
proposals on maps.
2. Provide employment to blacks in all phases of County governmental operation in
proportion to the census population - (comprehensive job training and search program).
3. Insure that all contracted construction and infrastructure projects that occur in this district
are staffed with residents and local contractors as much as possible.
4. Designate the same voting districts for school board as for County Commissioners . That
is urgent within itself.
5. Please respond promptly as we have patiently waited 96 years and are prepared to take
further actions.
Yours truly,
Anthony Stewart
President
Southem Christian Leadership Conference
Indian River County
/AS
5 1 -2Cv
'F Y % SMfffl.CPA, CGFO,C
Clerk of Circuit Curt & C()Mpti oller
P.O. Box 1028
item Beach, FL 32961-1028
Telephone_ (772) 770-5185
Southern Christian Leadership Conference
Indian River County Chapter
5835 59th Court
Vero Beach, Florida 32967
September 3, 2020
Dear Mr. Stewart,
This is in reply to your request of August 19, 2020 regarding obtaining copies of County
Commissioner's District maps. This office has conducted a search of our records going back to
1960. The only map we have on file was from the 2001 rredistrictina. We have
of the Board of County Commission Meeting Minutes where the redistricting issue was copies
discussed in 1991, 1981 1 1971, and 1961; however, the maps were not kept on file.
Please let us know if there is anything else we can provide.
Thank you,
Randi 'Wardlow
Deputy Clerk
Office of Clerk to the Board
51.21
/G,6
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSION
REQUEST TO BE SCHEDULED FOR PUBLIC DISCUSSION
Any organization or individual wishing to address the Board of County Commission shall complete this form and
submit it to the Indian River County Administrator's Office.
PUBLIC DISCUSSION INFORMATION
Indian River County Code Section 102.04(10)(b): as a general rule, public discussion items
should be limited to matters on which the commission may take action
Indian River County Code Section 102.11(3): limit remarks to three minutes unless
additional time is granted by the commission
NAME OF INDIVIDUAL OR ORGANIZATION: Elizabeth Siebert
4020 44th Manor PHONE:
ADDRESS:
Redistricting
SUBJECT MATTER FOR DISCUSSION:
(202)597-7058
IS A DIGITAL/ELECTRONIC PRESENTATION PLANNED? E�] YES D NO
WHAT RESOLUTION ARE YOU Alternative Redistricting Plan
REQUESTING OF THE COMMISSION?
ARE PUBLIC FUNDS OR ACTIVITIES REQUIRED? El YES 1�1 NO
WHAT FUNDS OR ACTIVITIES ARE None
REQUIRED TO MEET THIS
REQUEST?
For IRC Staff only:
Transmitted to Administrator Via:
Interactive Web Form
E -Mail
Hand Delivered
Phone
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR:
MEETING DATE:
Jason E. Brown
Oct 19, 2021
Alternative Redistricting
VO -ERS CHOOSE THEIR LEADERS VS LEADERS CHOOSING THE R VOTERS
Current vs Proposed Alternative Redistricting
Map
Benefits of
This Proposal
Uriies`TheTsfaz�d '' Abides By Dist,ictl
Into One District Criteria
------ - - - - - ...
Makes Elections More Decreases .1
Competitive Polarization in I-idian
River County
Upholds the 101 and Makes District 2
15th Amendments of smatter than other
the US Constitution proposed plans/.
Utilizes Old Dixie",
which is a well-
known historicat
landmark in Indian
River County.
Public Records Request Tuesday
To: Elizabeth Siebe- rt >
Public Records Request 20308
Good morning,
In response to your public records request for
tiany reports involving Elizabeth Siebert and
Deputy Joseph Flescher from 1996-2006",
please be advised no documentation was
located responsive.
Thank you.
55-3
Departmental Item
/a/�/
Indian River County, Florida
Department of Utility Services
Board Memorandum
Date: October 1, 2021
To: Jason E. Brown, County Administrator
From: Matthew Jordan, Interim Director of Utility Services
Prepared By: Terry Southard, Operations Manager
Subject: Finished Water Quality Audit Presentation from Kimley-Horn and Associates
Background:
Indian River County Department of Utility Services (IRCDUS) owns and operates two water treatment
plants (WTPs): South County Reverse Osmosis (SCRO), located at 1550 91h Street SW, and North County
Reverse Osmosis (NCRO), located at 7751 58th Avenue. Both of these facilities provide potable water to
the consolidated distribution system, which includes remote storage and re -pump facilities that provide
treated water to customers.
Over the years, IRCDUS has worked with various outside engineering firms to conduct water quality
reviews. IRCDUS has consistently worked towards optimizing operations while enhancing the quality of
finished water provided. Proactive measures have included design studies, construction of improvements,
finished water quality reports, corrosion coupon testing studies and evaluations, flushing measures, and
most recently, a Finished Water Quality Audit.
Analysis:
On February 18, 2021, Purchase Order 89687 was issue to Kimley-Horn and Associates (KHA) to evaluate
the distribution system water quality.
As part of the review, KHA reviewed historical water system quality test results and coordinated with staff
to collect available information regarding customer complaints and issues, lead and copper testing,
disinfection byproducts (DBP) testing, and bacteriological and coliform testing within the service area.
KHA completed the evaluation and provided a Finished Water Quality Audit, which they submitted to staff
in September 2021. Below are some key findings within the report's Executive Summary:
IRCDUS has been and continues to remain compliant with the provisions of the Safe Drinking
Water Act (SDWA), including the Lead and Copper Rule (LCR), a federal law that was promulgated
to protect public health through minimizing lead (Pb) and copper (Cu) levels in drinking water.
IRCDUS' compliance sampling for Pb is underthe action level (AL), the upcoming trigger level (TL),
and the Practical Quantitation Limit (PQL) for Pb.
IRCDUS' compliance sampling for Cu is well under the AL for Cu.
59
LCR sampling remains consistent with the previous year's results, and finished water is
characterized as "non -corrosive" based on regulatory compliance.
Staff has invited representatives of KHA. to discuss their water quality audit.
Recommendation:
No action required —for informational purposes only.
Attachment:
Finished Water Quality Audit Report
F:\Utilities\UTILITY- EMPLOYEE FOLDERS\Terry Southard\Agendas\Agenda - Finished Water Quality Audit Kimley Horn Presentation MDM 10
11 21.docx
60
Finished Water Quality Audit
PREPARED FOR INDIAN RIVER, COUNTY UTILITIES DEPARTMENT
.00
SEPTEMBER 2021
PREPARED BY:
Ki m ley/,&//\ Horn
Project No. 044572068
61
ABBREVIATIONS........................................................................................................................................4
EXECUTIVESUMMARY..............................................................................................................................5
INTRODUCTION...........................................................................................................................................
7
SYSTEM BACKGROUND............................................................................................................................8
POST-TREATMENT STABILIZATION DESCRIPTION............................................................................................9
WATERQUALITY......................................................................................................................................12
PARAMETERSAT POE...............................................................................................................................
12
DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM...............................................................................................................................
14
LEAD AND COPPER REVIEW..................................................................................................................18
LEADSAMPLING DISCUSSION.....................................................................................................................
18
COPPER SAMPLING DISCUSSION................................................................................................................21
DISINFECTION BYPRODUCT REVIEW....................................................................................................26
APPENDIX A - IRCU SYSTEM WATER AGE AND WATER QUALITY..................................................30
Indexof .• -
Table 1 - Finished Water Quality Goals 9
Table 2: IRCU Lead Sample Tap Results 19
Table 3: Lead Rankings by Location and WTP 20
Table 4: IRCU - Copper Sample Tap Results 22
Table 5: Copper Rankings by Location and WTP 24
Index of Figures 1: Oslo Water Quality Parameters at POE 13
Figure 2: Hobart Water Quality Parameters at POE 13
Figure 3: 13180 Highway A1A 15
Figure 4: 5110 Indian River Drive 15
Figure 5: 1824 94th Drive 16
Figure 6: 5920 Old Dixie Hwy 16
Figure 7: 830 Schumann Drive 17
62
Figure 8: 14499 US Hwy 1 17
Figure 9: Lead Sample Tap Results 19
Figure 10: Treasure Coast Utilities Lead 90th Percentile Data 21
Figure 11: Copper Sample Tap Results 23
Figure 12: Treasure Coast Utilities Copper 90th Percentile Data 25
Figure 13: TTHM Locational Running Annual Average (LRAA) 27
Figure 14: TTHM Operation Levels (OELs) 27
Figure 15: HAA5 Locational Running Annual Average (LRAA) 28
Figure 16: HAA5 Operational Evaluation Levels (OELs) 28
63
Kimley>»Horn
ADF
Average Daily Flow
ANSI
American National Standards Intuition
CCL
Contaminant Candidate List
CT
Contact Time
DBP
Disinfection By -Products
EPA
Environmental Protection Agency
FAS
Floridan Aquifer Supply Wells
FDEP
Florida Department of Environmenta` Protection
gfd
gallons per square foot per day
gpd
Gallons Per Day
gph
Gallons Per Hour
gpm
Gallons Per Minute
H2SO4
Sulfuric Acid
HzS
Hydrogen Sulfide
HAA
Haloacetic Acids
HDPE
High Density Polyethylene
HGL
Hydraulic Grade Line
HP
Horsepower
IDSE
Initial Distribution System Evaluation
IRCU
Indian River County Utilities
LCR
Lead And Copper Rule
LRAA
Location Running Annual Average
MCL
Maximum Contaminant Level
MCLG
Maximum Contaminant Level Goal
MDF
Maximum Daily Flow
MG
Million Gallons
MGD
Million Gallons Per Day
MRDLS
Maximum Residual Disinfectant Levels
NaOCI
Sodium Hypochlorite
NaOH
Sodium Hydroxide (caustic)
NF
Nanofiltration
NPDWR
National Primary Drinking Water Regulations
NSDWR
National Secondary Drink'.ng Water Regulation
NSF
National Sanitation Foundation
NTU
Nephelometric Turbidity Units
O&M
Operation and Maintenance
PLC
Programmable Logic ConYoller
PHF
Peak Hour Flow
ppd
Pounds Per Day
PQL
Practical Quantitation Limit
PVC
Polyvinyl Chloride
PWS
Public Water System
SCADA
Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition
SDWA
Safe Drinking Water Act
TDS
Total Dissolved Solids
TL
Trigger Level
TM
Technical Memorandum
TOC
Total Organic Carbon
TTHM
Total Trihalomethane
VFD
Variable Frequency Drive
WTP
Water Treatment Plant
Page 4
64
Kim ey>>> Horn Page 5
Indian River County Utilities (IRCU) owns and operates a consolidated water system, consisting of two
regional Water Treatment Plants (WTPs) with a combined maximum rated capacity of 25.71 MGD. The
water system has remote storage and repump facilities that provide treated water to their customers. To
enhance and stabilize water quality sent to customers, IRCU implements raw water blend and chemical
addition to permeate water to provide customers with a stable finished water quality. This treatment
technique is employed to enhance IRCU's ability to protect their distribution system network, as well as
their customer's household plumbing. Over time, IRCU has remained proactive towards optimizing
operations to enhance quality of finished water provided to their customers. Proactive measures have
included design studies, construction of improvements, finished water quality reports, corrosion testing
studies and evaluations, flushing measures, and most recently, this Finished Water Quality Audit.
Recently, IRCU has received an increase in customer complaints pertaining to household plumbing leaks.
Customer complaint locations have been variable throughout the County's water system. IRCU has been
responsive to their consumers through listening and responding to customer complaints, making visits to
homes, taking water quality samples, ar.d informing their consumers of IRCU's state and federal regulatory
compliance as it relates to providing safe and clean drinking water. As part of IRCU's ongoing efforts to be
proactive and address customer concerns regarding finished water quality, IRCU retained the services of
Kimley-Horn to review and evaluate water quality of its distribution system to confirm compliance with
regulatory agencies with respect to the lead and copper testing regimes, confirm treatment protocols are
working and determine, what, if any, protocol changes are needed.
As part of this investigation, the following elements pertaining to finished water corrosivity are noted:
• IRCU has been and remains compliant with the provisions of the Safe Drinking Water Act
(SDWA), including the Lead and Copper Rule (LCR), a federal law that intends to protect
public health through minimizing lead (Pb) and copper (Cu) levels in drinking water,
Primarily by reducing water corrosivity. Figures 10 and 12 within this report clearly illustrate
IRCU is in full compliance with lead and copper rule and in similar compliance with several other
local utilities located along the Treasure Coast.
• IRCU compliance sampling for lead is under the action level (AL), the upcoming trigger level (TL),
and the Practical Quantitation Limit (PQL) for lead.
• IRCU compliance sampling for copper is well under the AL for copper.
• LCR sampling is consistent wish previous years, and although 90th percentile values are slightly
higher than previous cycle, finished water is characterized as "non -corrosive" based on regulatory
compliance.
o IRCU could consider more frequent lead and copper sampling to better understand trends,
if any, that may exist.
o Additional sampling is recommended to coincide with distribution system flushing to better
understand impacts of hydraulic conditions and flushing affects with respect to lead and
copper sampling and sample results.
• The pending Lead and Copper Rule Revision (LCRR) removes calcium hardness as a water quality
parameter (WQP) for corrosion control treatment.
o This change will allow IRCU to shift chemical feed to focus on enhanced alkalinity, thereby
reducing potential of pH changes in the system.
Household plumbing failures are not urcommon and can be caused by a variety of causes, such as;
• stray current and/or associated lightning strikes that can cause these
65
Kim ey>>> Horn Page 6
• contact with dissimilar metals,
• thin wall copper plumbing typically installed during strong economy periods,
• workmanship,
• contact with defective drywall,
• plumbing techniques and inadequate flushing of lines after installation
• temperature changes,
• and quality of materials, to include just a few.
There are many factors that can initiate corrosion of residential plumbing that are NOT water quality
related that can contribute to household plumbing failures. After corrosion is initiated, water can
propagate, or advance corrosion. To mitigate these effects, IRCU has implemented measures, constructed
capital improvement projects and ded.cated resources towards enhancing their ability to protect water
system infrastructure.
IRCU is not alone in their efforts to strengthen consumer confidence through addressing complaints related
to plumbing failures. Many municipalities throughout the USA are responding to plumbing failure customer
complaints and are having to explain this very concept to their customers, some of which are in the Treasure
Coast and Southeast Florida. In summary, the following important factors relating to corrosion should be
noted:
Water purveyors and municipa7private water utilities are not responsible after the customers water
meter for the integrity of homeowner and customer plumbing and fixtures other than that prescribed
under the lead and copper rule (LCR).
There are many causal factors of pitting corrosion
o Workmanship and installation
o Dissimilar pipe interaction
o Elevated flow velocities
o Microbiological interactions
o Stray Electrical Currerts
o Lightning
The key legal case Brynwood vs. Clearwater in 1980's relieved utility of responsibility of pitting in
condo units serves as the base case for utility defenses in Florida.
This TM also reviewed IRCU's compliance with regulations pertaining to disinfection byproducts and overall
aesthetic quality of the finished water. In summary, the following key observations and recommendations
are provided:
IRCU remains compliant and below the MCL for TTHMs and HAA5s
The Cal—Flo (lime slurry) system contributes to finished water turbidity for both Oslo and Hobart.
Fluctuations in turbidity impact. the operational balance of maintaining consistent pH of 8.3.
o Operational optimizations consisting of lime slurry feed reduction and caustic addition at
both WTPs are recommended to maintain pH, reduce turbidity and achieve alkalinity of 70-
80 mg/L as CaCO3
o Operational testing confirmed feasibility of operational optimization.
o Minimum WQP value of calcium hardness (60 mg/L as CaCO3) must continue to be
maintained until LCRR is promulgated
Turbidity is variable throughout the distribution system.
o Elevated turbidity may be exacerbated in areas of low demand or areas that require
flushing, including dead-end mains.
o IRCU is exploring system -wide flushing plan to help resolve these issues.
66
Kimley»>Horn
Page 7
The clearwell turbidity data at Hobart suggest operations has challenges maintaining target pH
values and maximum turbidity than at Oslo. This was confirmed during operational testing.
Elevated alkalinity in the distribution system has resulted in fewer pH excursions and
o The elevated alkalinity has resulted in fewer pH excursions, but an overall reduction in
system pH.
o Increase in alkalinity and mitigating turbidity excursions through supplementing lime slurry
pH adjustment with caustic will assist IRCU in maintaining target pH of —8.3.
In 2013, Indian River County Utilities Department (IRCU) implemented a finished water stabilization system
to replace the zinc orthophosphate (ZO) feed system in order to improve finished water quality, enhance
control of potential corrosion, and provide water with more buffering capacity within the distribution system.
This project consisted of discontinuation of zinc orthophosphate corrosion inhibitor feed and implementation
of carbonic acid solution with lime slurry feed at both water treatment plants in order to improve buffering
capacity and stability of finished water.
In 2016, Kimley-Horn provided a distribution system water quality and corrosion investigation report which
included gravimetric and linear polarization resistance (LPR) testing results, water quality data review, and
operational adjustments at the WTPs in an effort to yield more favorable finished water quality conditions.
In summary, several key observations from the previous evaluation include:
• Inconsistent water quality influences corrosion rates negatively. Variations in water quality may
have been more tolerable in the past with the use of corrosion inhibitor (ZO), allowing wider
fluctuations in these parameters without mattering.
• Lead corrosion rates were less than copper corrosion rates with the change in corrosion control
treatment from ZO to CO2/lime.
o Supports the concept that copper corrosion is more susceptible to fluctuations in water
quality.
• The quality and purity of lime slurry (Cal—Flo) directly affects the turbidity of the product water, and
subsequent effectiveness at increasing pH and alkalinity. Suspected impurities in the Cal—Flo
product may contribute to this issue.
• The Hobart water plant produced more inconsistent water quality from the post-treatment system,
mostly during the SCADA system improvements. Operating the West/South and East/North
clearwells separately may contribute to this inconsistency.
• Lack of consistent chlorine feed to the Hobart West/South clearwell was observed, which may
interfere with lime dissolution in the mixing chamber.
• Flushing of areas within the water distribution system helped expedite flushing and removal of zinc
and other turbidity formed during the transition from ZO discontinuation and CO2/lime feed system
implementation.
• Raw water blend was reduced at both facilities to reduce the disinfection byproduct formation, and
the CO2/lime feed system was implemented to restore alkalinity and hardness. Although the
system was designed to operate at higher feed rates, operating costs will be higher with this change
in operation.
Approximately five years have lapsed since this evaluation was prepared for IRCU. Accordingly, IRCU
desires to continue to monitor and evaluate the water quality of its distribution system to confirm regulatory
67
Kim ey>>> Horn Page 8
compliance with respect to the lead and copper testing regimes, confirm treatment operating protocols are
working and determine, what, if any, protocol changes are needed.
Indian River County Utilities (IRCU) owns and operates a consolidated water system that treats and pumps
potable water to customers from two regional membrane softening water treatment plants (WTPs). The
southern portion of the County is served by the South Oslo Road WTP currently has a capacity rating of
8.57 MGD, consisting of 6 MGD nanofiltration (NF) permeate and 2.57 MGD of raw water bypass blend.
There are four (4) NF trains that treat brackish groundwater from seven (7) Upper Floridan Aquifer (UFA)
wells. Post-treatment stabilization is achieved through combination of raw water blend and chemical
addition, utilizing carbonic acid solution and lime slurry addition. Caustic feed for pH and alkalinity
adjustment is in place but not currently in service. Fluoride is also added to the finished water for consumer
health benefits and free chlorine is utilized for disinfection.
Oslo has historically operated with a raw water blend of 30 percent of the plant's capacity; however, due to
formation potential of disinfection by-products (DBPs), particularly of bromide species, this blend ratio has
been reduced over time, further reducing the contribution of hardness and alkalinity from the raw water.
This reduction in blend flow rate, although beneficial to finished water quality, results inadvertently in
treatment capacity reduction. IRCU has an active project to increase WTP capacity to 9 MGD with 7.5
MGD of NF permeate and 1.5 MGD of raw water bypass, reducing the blend ratio to 17% blend. This
project will include multiple improvements to the WTP, most notably to the membrane softening trains,
process piping, high service pumps, and chemical systems. Project is anticipated to be completed by winter
2024.
The northern portion of the county is served by the North Hobart WTP which has a capacity rating of 17.14
MGD. Due to permitted limitations associated with concentrate disposal to Spoonbill Marsh, the WTP is
truly limited to 11.44 MGD capacity. Hobart consists of eight (8) NF trains that treat brackish water from
nine (9) Upper Floridan Aquifer (UFA) wells. Similar to Oslo, post-treatment stabilization consists of raw
water blend, and chemical addition of carbonic acid, lime slurry and sodium hydroxide addition. The plant
is configured such that there are two banks of NF trains (North and South) and two clearwells (East &
West), where each bank is dedicated to a specific clearwell. This configuration has let to operational hurdles
towards maintaining a finished water quality. Hobart has historically maintained a raw water blend of 30
percent of the plant's capacity but has reduced blend flow percentages to reduce DBP formation potential
in the finished water. The existing post-treatment stabilization system serves to supplement the reduction
in hardness and alkalinity otherwise gained through raw water blend.
The goal of the membrane softening water treatment process is to produce water that is free of salts, low
in hardness and organics. In doing so, other more desirable constituents, such as hardness and alkalinity,
are removed from the water, leading to a less stable finished water quality. These types of characteristics
in membrane permeate water quality warrant post-treatment stabilization processes which add chemicals
back into the water to produce a less corrosive, slightly scale -forming and aesthetically pleasing water to
consumers. Post-treatment of nanofiltration (NF) permeate is especially necessary for compliance with the
United States Environmental Protecticn Agency's (USEPA) Lead and Copper Rule (LCR). The LCR
establishes action levels of 0.015 mg/L for lead and 1.3 mg/L for copper at consumer's taps and requires
corrosion control measures be implemented if more than 10 percent of the tap water samples collected
during any monitoring period exceed these levels. Post-treatment stabilization is therefore necessary to
inhibit corrosion and preserve the distribution system.
mm
Kimley>>> Horn Page 9
For years, raw water blending and zinc orthophosphate (ZO) were the methods used to stabilize the
membrane treated product water. Although this method was used to both inhibit corrosion and increase
alkalinity and hardness in the finished water, the alkalinity was still low (less than 20 mg/I as CaCO3).
Finished water quality fluctuations would sometimes create turbid conditions in the finished water when the
zinc orthophosphate would come out of solution, a phenomenon which only occurred when pH exceeded
8.3. Raw water blending also resulted in an increase in other constituents which were already removed
through the membrane softening process, such as sodium, chlorides, and specifically organics which
resulted in increased disinfection byproducts (DBPs) into the distribution system.
In order to address these issues, a finish water stabilization study was prepared for Indian River County
which outlined alternatives for post-treatment stabilization. The results of the study recommended pilot
testing and subsequent construction of a carbonic acid solution and lime slurry addition to the degasified
permeate at both water treatment facilities (RO Plants Lime Slurry Addition, completed in spring 2014).
The intent of the project was to primarily increase finish water alkalinity and improve overall stability through
remineralization without the use of zinc orthophosphate corrosion inhibitor. This project was successfully
implemented and both WTPs have been operating with a combination of lime slurry and carbonic acid
solution for approximately seven (7) years. Design water quality goals for alkalinity and hardness have
been achieved and maintained since this project was completed, with values ranging from 60-70 mg/L as
CaCO3 and 80-100 mg/L as CaCO3, respectively. The following table presents the current finished water
quality values for Hobart and Oslo, as well as the goals that were established during the previous
investigation and PDR for the finished water stabilization system:
Tahiti 1 - Finished Water Oiiality (mals
Water Quality Parameter
Goal
Current Water Quality
State Designated
Optimal Water Quality
Parameters @ POE***
Hobart
Oslo
pH
8.3
8.15
8.2
7.9-8.5
Calcium Hardness (mg/L as CaCO3)
70
90
85
60-100
Total Hardness (mg/L as CaCO3)
120
115
110
N/A
Alkalinity (mg/L as CaCO3)
70
66
62
40-80
LSI*
0.1-0.2
0.07
0.07
N/A
CCPD*
0.5—
10.0
0.43
0.38
N/A
TDS (mg/L)
300-350
275-315
275-315
N/A
Dissolved Inorganic Carbonate (mg C/L)
17
16
16
N/A
* Calculated using RTW Model
** Predicted utilizing EPA Guidance Manual for Selecting Lead and Copper Control Strategies
*** From IRC reporting Format 62-550.730(4)@
POST-TREATMENT STABILIZATION DESCRIPTION
Carbonic acid solution (H2CO3) is used for re -carbonation and to assist the calcium addition increase
alkalinity of the product water. This system reduces pH of the product water stream and converts hydroxide
to bicarbonate and carbonate species to enhance lime and/or caustic addition. The H2CO3 feed system
provides buffering capacity for the product stream but does not add alkalinity by itself. The combination of
this system with lime helps increase alkalinity and hardness of the finished water. H2CO3 lowers pH of the
degasified permeate to make it possible for the water to dissolve or uptake more lime without the dramatic
pH increase that would otherwise occur through lime addition by itself.
69
Kim ey>>> Horn Page 10
This system includes a refrigerated storage and receiver tank and utilizes a Pressure Solution Feed (PSF)
system manufactured by TomCO2 Systems® (Loganville, GA) to add carbonic acid solution to the clearwell.
The PSF system injects pressurized CO2 gas into a side stream of pressurized degasified permeate to
dissolve the CO2 into solution. This reaction generates H2CO3that is added into the degasified RO product
water. Hobart and Oslo contain two PSF panels, each intended to be dedicated to a clearwell (Hobart) or
clearwell bay (Oslo), two carrier water pumps to elevate the pressure of the water stream, and diffuser
injection assemblies installed at the end of the degasifier down comer pipe. There is not a redundant PSF
cabinet at either WTP. The PSF system, in conjunction with the pre-treated and acidified raw water blend,
has demonstrated the ability to provide adequate buffering capacity with pH ranges of 5-5.5, pre lime
addition.
The lime slurry feed system is a proprietary system provided by Burnett, Inc. (Campobello, SC). The system
includes a bulk storage tank, make-up water supply, mixer, and diaphragm pumps, and a patented lime
slurry chemical. The system includes dedicated chemical feed lines to each degasifier bay and variable
speed mixers to enhance the mixing and dissolution of lime slurry. The lime slurry system operates at a
dosage setpoint with pH trim control via submersible probes installed at the end of the clearwell structure.
Lime slurry is added to increase pH, add hardness, and form alkalinity with the buffering capacity provided
by the TomCO20 system. The addition of calcium hydroxide, or lime, is a cost-effective finished water
stabilization method. It provides enhanced stability in the water by increasing alkalinity and provides a more
consistent method of forming a protective film on the interior surface of distribution system piping and
components. Lime slurry has been used extensively in the water treatment industry for many years. It has
been typically used for lime softening of hard waters and more recently as a finished water stabilization
method of very soft waters, such as RO & NF permeate waters. Several installations in Florida are in
operation at water treatment plants for stabilization of product waters. It is a relatively simple system and
its operation is familiar to most water plant operators. The process generally consists of H2CO3 addition
followed by lime slurry addition and mixing. H2CO3 is added to lower pH and enhance dissolution of the
lime which increases the alkalinity of the blended stream. The lime slurry raises the pH, adds calcium
hardness to the stream, and increases the alkalinity all at the same time.
Photo 1 - Oslo Post -Treatment Facilities
Photo 2 - Clearwell Weir
70
Kim ey>>> Horn Page 11
To date, the post-treatment system has yielded favorable water quality results which has enhanced the
County's control of corrosion within the system. One adverse effect of the carbonic acid and lime slurry
process has been the inability to dissolve all of the solids that are present in the lime slurry solution, mainly
due to the trace impurities that exist in the lime slurry. Since implementation, IRCU has noted difficulties in
maintaining turbidity less than 1 ntu prior to transfer pumping product water to ground storage. This issue
is not unique as other Southeastern Florida membrane facilities with this post-treatment stabilization
process have experienced the same, or similar impact, of additional turbidity from the lime slurry system.
In 2016, IRCU noted sedimentation at the bottom of the ground storage tanks that was not present prior to
the lime slurry system. Samples were taken and sent to a lab and appear to be consistent with the lime
slurry product sheets. This effort was duplicated by another nearby municipality and the findings were
similar in that much of the insoluble matter was primarily calcium, with lower amounts of aluminum, iron,
silica and zinc. The following photo illustrates the sediment found at the WTP and re -pump ground storage
tank (North Beach).
Photo 3 - Ground Storage Tank Sediment
71
Kimley»>Horn
PARAMETERS AT POE
Page 12
Hobart and Oslo provide finished water that is characteristically higher in hardness and alkalinity
concentrations for a Floridan membrane plant, this is primarily due to the quality of source water and IRCU's
ability to blend. Alkalinity in the finished water provides resistance to pH changes in the system, whether it
be from age, temperature, loss of residual, etc. Historically, both WTPs have shown to exhibit a degree of
pH fluctuation at POE which operations has primarily attributed to the added turbidity from lime slurry feed
or the SCADA's system ability to respond to set point ratios and pH trim functions.
IRCU desires to maintain finished water turbidity of approximately 1 ntu and pH of 8.3. Operations has
noted difficulty in achieving this target with the lime slurry system, as the pH adjustment after carbonic acid
solution system results in variable turbidity values in the finished water. Furthermore, based on differing
qualities of the lime slurry that is delivered, operations has had a difficult time "dialing in" a specific flow
setpoint and achieving consistent pH and turbidity. Based on operational data, these values can vary from
1 - 4 ntu, all while the system is working to achieve the same pH setpoint value. This problem is
exacerbated at Hobart, where operations has to essentially run two separate WTP processes with each
bank of four NF trains tied to a specific clearwell. To counteract the water quality variation at Hobart, IRCU
had implemented caustic feed to supplement the pH and alkalinity increase exhibited by the Cal-flo system,
without the added turbidity. This process change was completed in 2016 (during Phase C of the corrosion
investigation). Figures 1 and 2 demonstrate a tighter window of pH ranges at Hobart primarily due to the
consistent results of caustic feed. Conversely, these figures show that Oslo is able to sustain tighter window
for alkalinity and hardness, primarily because the lime slurry system is the sole source of pH adjustment.
The following graphs display calcium, alkalinity, and pH values from both facilities at POE:
72
Kim ey>>)Horn Page 13
Figure 1: Oslo Water Quality Parameters at POE
120 8.45
110 8.4
I
10a 100 8.35
U
cNo 901A_ 8.3
E 80 1 1 T1 8.25=
n
�AlSIT1G.'1Gtif���i�d47�d�
60 8.15
ART 140
U 50 8.1
40 8.05
5/15/2019 8/23/2019 12/1/2019 3/10/2020 6/18/2020 9/26/2020 1/4/2021 4/14/2021
Date
Calcium (mg/L as CaCO3) Total Alkalinity (mg/L as CaCO3) -f—pH
Figure 2: Hobart Water Quality Parameters at POE
120 R 4S
Kim ey>Morn Page 14
Recently, the EPA issued the proposed revisions to the LCR (Lead and Copper Rule Revision) that
proposed removal of calcium as a water quality parameter for corrosion control. This development deviates
from corrosion indices, such as LSI and CCPP as being indicators of corrosion control, due to their reliance
on calcium hardness to yield scale -forming water. In its place, parameters like alkalinity, dissolved inorganic
carbonate (DIC), and orthophosphate residual are considered for enhancing corrosion control.
Orthophosphate inhibitors are used to generate a protective film on the inside of distribution and customer
plumbing, while also providing alkalinity to resist pH changes.
From January through March 2021, IRCU has received customer complaints regarding water quality
aesthetics. These complaints are variable in description of color, smell, and taste. The complaints were
reviewed throughout the system and incorporated in the water system model to understand if there was a
direct relationship with water age. This exercise was inconclusive, as the complaints were random in
location and inconsistent with regards to description and water age. However, one common theme from
some of the customer complaints is the presence of turbidity (cloudiness, haziness) in the finished water
and the ability to reduce this turbidity through flushing of the distribution mains nearby and the customer's
plumbing. In one instance, IRCU sampled the water that was flushed from the hydrant and discovered
elevated concentrations of calcium, magnesium, iron, and aluminum. Each of these constituents listed is
present in the lime slurry statement of content and may have attributed to the water quality discovered. It
appears that some areas within the system, in addition to dead end runs, turbidity appears to concentrate
until it reaches the customer's residence, where the complaint will ensue, and subsequent flushing will
restore water quality in the area. This appears to be a consistent theme for complaints through the system.
In effort to address these complaints, IRCU is in the process of evaluating system flushing program.
Since 2014, IRCU has conducted water quality sampling (approximately once every 3 months) from the six
(6) DBP sampling locations in the distribution system. These sampling locations vary in terms of water age,
and locations range from Gifford to the Roseland areas. The water quality parameters tested for consist of
calcium, alkalinity, pH, temperature, chlorine residual, and pH. Noteworthy trends include the following:
1. IRCU's ability to increase alkalinity concentrations at each of the six locations. This has translated
to less variable pH values measured during the respective sampling events.
2. Decreasing pH throughout the system. The data indicates finished water is trending from the goal
of —8.3 towards 8.0. This pH reduction may have attributed to the increase in Lead and copper
90th percentile values discussed herein.
The following graphs are provided for each of the six (6) sample locations to demonstrate the trends
described herein:
74
Kimley»>Horn
Page 15
Figure 3: 13180 Highway A1A
100 9.2
1i
Figure 4: 5110 Indian River Drive
90
x
9
co
90
����
g
CS)
80
~`0
70
8.8
)K..
••�•
XX..
8.8
X
8.7
0.95
Variation
� ��� XX � �
X X .�'L "'••
-0.70,_ .X
Variation ``_1 �C **..,X X•X.
co 0
60
60
8.6� CL
X �� �
�
5)
50
"'
X
8.4
co
J
Q4`)
x..
GA
-0.45
3)
40`x1
8.2
Variation
8.1
x x----------------------
-----------------------------X-
8.2
30
*---
10/31/21
c
Date
w
x
Q
20
8
•••••'•••
12/27/14 05/10/16 09/22/17 02/04/19 06/18/20 10/31/21
Date
Alkalinity, Total as CaCO3 Field pH
••••••••• Linear (Alkalinity, Total as CaCO3) ---- Linear (pH Range)
Figure 4: 5110 Indian River Drive
75
100
X
9
90
8.9
8.8
0
U
81)
X
8.7
)
70
-0.70,_ .X
Variation ``_1 �C **..,X X•X.
8.6
J
60
.X )( , V�1;;i�T X
) _ •. .. .•A X �
_
8.5 a
X �� �
5)
.. � � --� �
x
A
8.4
E
) � d
X G � A
8.3
Q4`)
� Variation
3)
XX
8.2
8.1
2`J
-----------------------------X-
8
12/27/14
05/10/16 09/22/17 02/04/19 06/18/20
10/31/21
Date
X
Alkalinity, Total as CaCO3 Field pH
•••••'•••
Linear (Alkalinity, Total as CaCO3) ---- Linear (pH Range)
75
Kimley>»Horn
Figure 5: 1824 94th Drive
Page 16
Figure 6: 5920 Old Dixie Hwy
100 9
100
9
90
8.9
0
O
80
`
8.8
O
80
-0.70 ;K - -)KX
8.7
U
70
` `
Variation X �)K....
co
-0.60 X X - _
o�
60
.....X ..... •• X
--0.30 8.5 n
E
..`'�
X X
Variation
n
50
X
X
8.4
c
Y
X X X ��
co
40
8.3
Q
40
X--
8.2
X ---------- ---------------
8.2
8.1
30
X
8.1
20
20
8
8
12/27/14 05/10/16 09/22/17 02/04/19 06/18/20
10/31/21
05/10/16 09/22/17 02/04/19 06/18/20
10/31/21
Date
Date
Alkalinity, Total as CaCO3 Field pH
X
Alkalinity, Total as CaCO3 Field pH
......•••
Linear (Alkalinity, Total as CaCO3) ---- Linear (pH Range)
......••• Linear (Alkalinity, Total as CaCO3) ---• Linear (pH Range)
Figure 6: 5920 Old Dixie Hwy
100 9
76
90
8.9
8.8
0
O
80
X
0---
;KX
8.7
U
70
___-------_
En
-0.60 X X - _
8.6
60
Variation X W X X �,,..1K••
8.5 =
,....
:��...... X 0.50
n
50
XX X Variation
8.4
Y
X X X ��
8.3
40
X
Q
X X
8.2
30
8.1
20
8
12/27/14
05/10/16 09/22/17 02/04/19 06/18/20
10/31/21
Date
X
Alkalinity, Total as CaCO3 Field pH
......••• Linear (Alkalinity, Total as CaCO3) ---• Linear (pH Range)
76
Kimley»>Horn
Figure 7: 830 Schumann Drive
Page 17
Figure 8: 14499 US Hwy 1
100
9
90
x
8.9
MO
80
xX X
8.8
m
x
8.7
U
700.55
'A
� � x X .... ...
.•.
8.6
JVariation
60
i
X ��� •••,W..X•
xX )W
8.5 a
>,
8.6
►
^�
8.4
50
60y,�X
��
8.5 Q
Q
40
X X
� Q_ L\
Q
-0.30
8.3
'E
". :,
Variation
8.2
30
SIC
8.3
Q
8.1
)K y(
8.2
30
8.1
20
—
--'-- 8
12/27/14
05/10/16 09/22/17 02/04/19 06/18/20
10/31/21
12/27/14 05/10/16 09/22!17 02/04/19 06/18/20 10/31/21
Date
Date
x
Alkalinity, Total as CaCO3 Field pH
X
Alkalinity, Total as CaCO3 Field pH
•••••••••
Linear (Alkalinity, Total as CaCO3) ---- Linear (pH Range)
•••••••••
Figure 8: 14499 US Hwy 1
ply
100
9
`lk�
8.9
90
8.8
M80
��� X :Y
X
-0.80
�� X
8.7
U
70
Variation X ")K
8.6
U)
60y,�X
8.5 Q
••
8.4
50
'E
0.40
40
Vartion
ia
8.3
Q
)K y(
8.2
30
8.1
yc— — — — — — — — — — X--
— ----
20
8
12/27/14 05/10/16 09/22!17 02/04/19 06/18/20 10/31/21
Date
X
Alkalinity, Total as CaCO3 Field pH
•••••••••
Linear (Alkalinity, Total as CaCO3) ---- Linear (pH Range)
ply
Kim ey ))) Horn Page 18
United States Environmental Protection Agency's (USEPA) LCR component of the SDWA establishes
action levels for lead and copper at consumers taps. Typically, sampling in a representative number of
customer's taps is required every three years. The LCR establishes action levels of 0.015 mg/L for lead
and 1.3 mg/L for copper, respectively at consumer's taps, and requires corrosion control measures be
implemented if more than 10 percent (90th percentile) of the tap water samples collected during any
monitoring period exceed these levels.
Lead sources in drinking water include lead service lines (LSLs), soldered joints, and brass (many of which
are found on the customer's side of the meter). Copper plumbing and fixtures are primary contributors to
its presence in the drinking water. Elevated lead and copper concentrations in drinking water can be
correlated to the water chemistry's ability to propagate corrosion. Water is the universal solvent and there
are many factors that contribute to corrosion, such as stray current (lightning), plumbing workmanship,
defects in materials, velocity, contact with dissimilar metals, etc. Regardless of the water system, corrosion
can and will occur. The LCR is in place to help guide utilities in controlling the rate of corrosion through
setting action levels for lead and copper. Exceedance of these action levels described herein will result in
regulatory enforcement of Optimal Corrosion Control Technique (DCCT), which requires utilities to
investigate and implement corrosion control measures to mitigate lead and copper corrosion.
Indian River County Utilities remains compliant with the provisions of the Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA),
including the Lead and Copper Rule (LCR), a federal law that intends to protect public health through
minimizing lead (Pb) and copper (Cu) levels in drinking water, primarily by reducing water corrosivity. The
following sections discuss IRCU's historical LCR sampling data.
LEAD SAMPLING DISCUSSION
Lead enters drinking water primarily from the lead -containing solder and flux material used to join copper
pipes in home plumbing and new cast -brass faucets (Cardels and Sorg 1990). The most important water
quality parameters related to lead solubility are pH, alkalinity, dissolved inorganic carbonate, and ortho-
phosphate levels (AWWARF 1990). A recent survey of lead at the consumer tap concluded that the highest
lead levels were found in the newest plumbing systems onto which household electrical systems were
grounded (Lee et. al. 1989). It was also demonstrated that controlling the pH values in water in the
distribution system to greater than 8.0 and the addition of blended phosphate inhibitor reduced the home
tap lead concentrations. Corrosion control methods that rely on adjusting the pH have been shown to be a
cost-effective, reliable and the more common methods of treatment currently in practice today (Taylor, et.al.,
1992; Vinci 1991; Maas 1991; McNally, et. al., 1993). IRCU utilizes pH, alkalinity and calcium carbonate
adjustment techniques for finished water stabilization.
IRCU has maintained compliance with lead samples below the 901h percentile action level of 0.015 mg/L.
From 2011 through December 2015, 901h percentile data displayed a downward trend. Since this sampling
event, lead 901h percentile data has trended upwards with 90th percentile data increasing to 0.003 mg/L.
Although 90% of the samples were at this value or lower, the average concentration of lead in the samples
has maintained relatively consistent, with exception of the May 2016 LCR sampling event. In this instance,
there was one outlier sample that was approximately 17 times greater than the next highest ranked lead
sample, which contributed to the overall average increase but no impact to the 90th percentile value.
Kimley»>Horn
Table 2: IRCU Lead Sample Tap Results
Page 19
Sampling
Date
Average
(mg/L)
Maximum
(mg/L)
50th
Percentile
(mg/L)
75th
Percentile
(mg/L)
90th
Percentile
(mg/L)
ActionSample
Level
(mg/L)
Size
Aug -11
0.002
0.014
0.001
0.001
0.002
0.015
50
Aug -14
0.001
0.004
0.001
0.001
0.002
0.015
50
Dec -15
0.001
0.001
0.001
0.001
0.001
0.015
50
May -16
0.008
0.360
0.001
0.001
0.002
0.015
50
Dec -16
0.0007
0.0029
0.001
0.001
0.001
0.015
50
Aug -19
0.001
0.0057
0.00064
0.0007875
0.003
0.015
52
Overall, lead levels in the drinking water are well below the action level of 0.015 mg/L, or 15 parts per billion.
The slight variation of 1 part per billion from the previous sampling event 3 years prior should be monitored
but is not cause for concern. Since this testing is conducted on a triennial basis, there is insufficient data
to support the notion that lead corrosion rates have increased. In order to more accurately track lead
corrosion, IRCU may consider conducting their own lead and copper sampling (separate from LCR
sampling) on a more frequent basis (bi-annually or annually) to have a better understanding of the lead
concentration trends.
0.016
0.014
0.012
0.010
0.008
E
0.006
U)
a�
0.004
�a
m
0.000
O
J0
�O
Figure 9: Lead Sample Tap Results
i
Date
-E 50th Percentile (mg/L) 75th Percentile (mg/L)
Action Level (mg/L) ..... CC System in Place
90th Percentile (mg/L)
The following table presents the sites that exhibited the highest ranking with respect to lead sample
results:
79
Kimley>»Horn
Table 3: Lead Rankings by Location and WTP
Location
Year
Lead Rank
# of Samples
WTP
1850 6th St
Aug -1 1
50
50
OSLO
681 23rd Place SW
Aug -11
47
50
OSLO
856 10th Court
Aug -11
49
50
OSLO
24 Highland Drive SW
Aug -11
48
50
OSLO
1021 2nd Street
Aug -11
42
50
OSLO
1050 31st Ave
Aug -11
40
50
OSLO
2206 16th Ave
Aug -14
50
50
OSLO
8345 Chinaberry Road
Aug -14
49
50
HOBART
2075 7th Drive SW
Aug -14
48
50
OSLO
9612 Riverside Drive
Aug -14
47
50
HOBART
675 4th Street
Dec -15
50
50
OSLO
2465 17th Ave SW
Dec -15
49
50
OSLO
1405 82nd Ave
Dec -15
48
50
OSLO
1175 Winding Oaks
Dec -15
47
50
HOBART
1980 Coco Plum Lane
Jun -16
49
50
HOBART
1235 Palmetto Court
Jun -16
48
50
HOBART
8388 Calamandren Way
Jun -16
50
50
HOBART
2046 8th Ave SW
Jun -16
47
50
OSLO
5 Sunset Drive
Aug -19
52
52
HOBART
302 Citrus Ave
Aug -19
51
52
HOBART
869 Robin Lane
Aug -19
50
52
HOBART
449 Alamonda Ave
Aug -19
49
52
HOBART
Page 20
As shown, over time, the highest-ranking sites appear to have shifted from areas served by Oslo WTP to
areas in the system primarily served by Hobart. The following graph presents IRCU's lead sample data
with respect to other nearby treasure coast utilities that utilize similar source water and treatment
techniques. The figure also displays the lead trigger level (TL) that is proposed under the Lead and Copper
Revision Rule (not promulgated at the time of this report). Amongst other proposed requirements, such as
LSL replacement and public outreach, the TL requires utilities with 90th percentile values between 10-15
ppb to initiate planning, additional monitoring (annually) and implement treatment requirements in effort to
mitigate lead corrosion rates. IRCU has maintained 901h percentile values below 5 ppb, which EPA defines
as the Practical Quantitation Level (PQL) for lead. This presents a lesser degree of confidence that lead is
present in the finished water at the reported concentration.
:I
Kim9ey»>Horn
Page 21
Figure 10: Treasure Coast Utilities Lead 90th Percentile Data
0.015 — —
— — — — — — — — -
0.014
Stabilization Method
0.013
1
0.012
Caustic, Corrosion Inhibitor
0.011
2
0.01 —
— — — — — — — — — —
0.009
3
0.008
CO2, Caustic, Corrosion Inhibitor
0.007
4
0.006
Caustic, Corrosion Inhibitor
0.005
�.
0.004
CO2, Caustic, Corrosion Inhibitor
TC Utility
. •.a.
.�,
0.003
�i •r :
0.002
#
0.001
Caustic, Blending
0
Jul -09
Nov -10 Apr -12 Aug -13
Corrosion Control
(CC) in place
Ally •
�...... 0-.-9 ... •
.� ...........................
Dec -14 May -16 Sep -17 Feb -19 Jun -20 Oct -21
•••♦— TC Utility 3 - Lead --dp-- IRCU - Lead
, TC Utility 2 - Lead TC Utility 4 - Lead
••0••• TC Utility 6 - Lead ... 0... TC Utility 7 - Lead
-0- LCRR Increased Monitoring • a • • • CC System in Place
TC Utility 1 - Lead
TC Utility 5 - Lead
— — — Current AL
Utility
Treatment
Stabilization Method
TC Utility
1
RO & NF
Caustic, Corrosion Inhibitor
TC Utility
2
RO & B==end
Raw Water Blend, Caustic
TC Utility
3
RO
CO2, Caustic, Corrosion Inhibitor
TC Utility
4
NF & Bind
Caustic, Corrosion Inhibitor
TC Utility
5
RO & NF
CO2, Caustic, Corrosion Inhibitor
TC Utility
6
RO & Lime Softening
Caustic, Corrosion Inhibitor
TC Utility
7
1 RO & Lone Softening
Caustic, Blending
As shown, IRCU's lead sample data is -elatively consistent with seven (7) analogous water system
purveyors in the treasure coast area and in compliance with the LCR.
COPPER SAMPLING DISCUSSION
Copper enters drinking water primarily from distribution and copper piping materials used in household
plumbing. The corrosion rate of copper is affected by pH, alkalinity, dissolved oxygen, chlorine residual and
possibly calcium (AWWARF 1985). Copper -containing protective corrosion scales formed in non -
phosphate -inhibited waters are pH sensitive (Reiber 1989). Experimental studies that investigated the
effects of generalized corrosion in service piping systems have shown that soft, acidic or low pH waters
develop high concentrations of copper during standing or stagnant conditions (Meyer 1981). The corrosion
potential of the water was found to be liess apparent in moderate- to high -alkalinity waters in which there
Kim ey>>> Horn Page 22
was sufficient bicarbonate that allowed a protective film to form on the pipe wall. Increasing the pH to above
pH 8.0 significantly reduces the copper solubility of water (AWWARF 1985; McNally, et. al., 1993). IRCU
maintains relatively moderate alkalinity concentration (--60 mg/L as CaCO3) at the Point -of -Entry to the
distribution system at Hobart and Oslo.
IRCU has maintained compliance with copper concentrations less than 90th percentile action level of 1.3
mg/L. Since 2011, the copper sample results in the 50th, 75th, and 90th percentile have increased slightly
up until 2015, with a marked increase in the May 2016 data. There was a slight increase from 2011 to
2014, and from 2014 to 2015. The copper levels from 2015 to May 2016 showed a greater increase, where
the 90th percentile of copper levels in the distribution system quadrupled. The December 2016 exhibited
a 25% decrease in the 90th percentile values obtained in May 2016. The reduction in copper concentrations
may be contributed to the increase in alkalinity and hardness in the finished water implemented in
September 2016. Although this is an improvement, the statistical values are still currently higher than those
observed in sampling prior to May 2016.
Table 4: IRCU - Copper Sample Tap Results
Sampling
Date
Average
(mg/L)
Maximum
(mg/L)
50th
Percentile
(mg/L)
75th
Percentile
(mg/L)
90th
Percentile
(mg/L)
Action
Level
(mg/L)
Sample
Size
Aug -11
0.008
0.150
0.002
0.007
0.017
1.3
50
Aug -1 4
0.019
0.120 R
0.012
0.025
0.038
1.3
50
Dec -15
0.022
0.075
0.015
0.033
0.051
1.3
50
May -16
0.075
0.350
0.040
0.115
0.202
1.3
50
Dec -16
0.071
0.300
0.048
0.084
0.151
1.3
50
Aug -19
0.086
0.370
0.075
0.130
0.178
1.3
52
RIN
Kimley>»Horn
Figure 11: Copper Sample Tap Results
1.400
1.200
1.000 •
Corrosion Control (CC)
in place
3 0.800 -----►
tM •
0.600 •
0.400
L •
Q 0.200
O •
U •
0.000 r •
Nix "Irb NA
� Ce 5eQ F
Date
--i— 50th Percentile (mg/L) 75th Percentile (mg/L) 90th Percentile (mg/L)
Action Level (mg/L) • .... CC System in Place
Page 23
Kimley»>Horn
Page 24
The following table presents the sites that exhibited the highest ranking with respect to copper sample
results:
Table 5: Copper Rankings by Location and WTP
Location
Year
Copper
Rank
# of
Samples
WTP
1850 6th St
Aug -11
49
50
OSLO
681 23rd Place SW
Aug -11
50
50
OSLO
24 Highland Drive SW
Aug -11
45
50
OSLO
1021 2nd Street
Aug -11
48
50
OSLO
1050 31st Ave
Aug -11
47
50
OSLO
2206 16th Ave
Aug -14
48
50
OSLO
8345 Chinaberry Road
Aug -14
50
50
HOBART
2075 7th Drive SW
Aug -14
49
50
OSLO
9612 Riverside Drive
Aug -14
47
50
HOBART
1991 W Sand Dollar Lane
Dec -15
50
50
HOBART
150 43rd Ave
Dec -15
49
50
OSLO
3575 Marthas Lane
Dec -15
48
50
HOBART
1021 2nd Street
Dec -15
47
50
OSLO
9455 Frangipani Drive
Jun -16
50
50
HOBART
1991 W Sand Dollar Lane
Jun -16
49
50
HOBART
1980 Coco Plum Lane
Jun -16
48
50
HOBART
1235 Palmetto Court
Jun -16
47
50
HOBART
1175 Winding Oaks
Nov -16
50
50
HOBART
1991 Sandier Road
Nov -16
49
50
HOBART
5730 Turnberry Lane
Nov -16
48
50
HOBART
9455 Fan i ani Drive
Nov -16
47
50
HOBART
1582 Damask Lane
Aug -19
52
52
HOBART
5730 Turnberry Lane
Aug -19
51
52
HOBART
618 Browning Terrace
Aug -19
50
52
HOBART
1960 S Garden Grove
Circle
Aug -19
49
52
OSLO
As shown, over time, the highest-rank'ng sites appears to have shift from areas served by Oslo WTP to
areas in the system primarily served by Hobart. The following graph presents IRCU's copper sample data
with respect to other nearby treasure coast utilities that utilize similar source water and treatment
techniques.
84
Kim ey>>> Horn Page 25
Figure 12: Treasure Coast Utilities Copper 90th Percentile Data
1.5
Treatment
Stabilization Method
TC Utility
1.4
Caustic, Corrosion Inhibitor
TC Utility
2 RO & Blend
Raw Water Blend, Caustic
TC Utility
3 RO
CO2, Caustic, Corrosion Inhibitor
1.2
4 NF & Rend
Caustic, Corrosion Inhibitor
TC Utility
1.1
CO2, Caustic, Corrosion Inhibitor
TC Utility
6 RO & Lime Softening
1.0
TC Utility
Corrosion Control (CC)
Caustic, Blending
in place
0.9
0.8
•
0.7
0.6
•
0.5
;
0.4
..............
! ..
0.3
'
0.2
r �• �' , .
0.1
#................�
...... ....
..............:1�.,:.: �, `�' a:.'.....:
s
0.0
Jul -09 Nov -10 Apr -12
Aug -13 Dec -14 May -16 Sep -17
Feb -19 Jun -20 Oct -21
--dpa IRCU - Copper
TC Utility 1 - Copper
TC Utility 2 - Copper
O ... TC Utility 3 - Copper
TC Utility 4 - Copper
TC Utility 5 - Copper
•••0 ... TC Utility 6 - Copper
... ..• -C Utility 7 - Copper
— LCR AL
• • • • • CC System in Place
Utility
Treatment
Stabilization Method
TC Utility
1 RO & NF
Caustic, Corrosion Inhibitor
TC Utility
2 RO & Blend
Raw Water Blend, Caustic
TC Utility
3 RO
CO2, Caustic, Corrosion Inhibitor
TC Utility
4 NF & Rend
Caustic, Corrosion Inhibitor
TC Utility
5 RO & NF
CO2, Caustic, Corrosion Inhibitor
TC Utility
6 RO & Lime Softening
Caustic, Corrosion Inhibitor
TC Utility
7 1 RO & Lime Softening
Caustic, Blending
As shown, IRCU's copper sample data is relatively consistent with seven (7) analogous water purveyors
located in the treasure coast area and in compliance with the LCR. The slight variation in copper 901h
percentile is noted and may be attributed to the pH variances in the distribution system. However, the
copper data is indicative of non -corrosive water and correlates closely with other neighboring utilities along
the southeast and Treasure Coast.
Kim ey>>> Horn Page 26
The National Primary Drinking Water Regulations (NPDWRs) establish monitoring and other requirements
for municipalities to achieve compliance with maximum contaminant levels based on locational running
annual averages (LRAA) for total trihalomethanes (TTHMs) and haloacetic (HAAS) and maximum residual
disinfectant residuals. The USEPA determined that regulating these two groups of DBPs would yield an
overall reduction in all DBPs and set MCLs of 80 ppb and 60 ppb for TTHMs and HAA5s, respectively.
Operational Evaluation Levels (OELs) are also established to provide greater level of guidance for water
purveyors through putting higher weight towards the most recent quarter of DBP concentrations. These
requirements are defined under the Stage 1 and Stage 2 Disinfection Byproducts Rule. The intent of this
rule is to improve protection of public health through reducing exposure to disinfection byproducts, which
may cause liver, kidney or central nervous system issues.
DBP formation is a function of total organic carbon (TOC) and bromide concentrations, disinfectant utilized
and water age. Drinking water systems utilize disinfection to inactivate, or "kill," viruses or organisms to
protect customers from waterborne diseases and pathogens. IRCU utilizes source water from the upper
Floridan Aquifer (UFA) for treatment, which is relatively free of TOC. The source water has hardness and
alkalinity that is helpful in stabilizing the finished water, but also has bromide (ranging from 1-3 mg/L) which
is a precursor to DBP formation. The membrane softening system rejects bromide similar to calcium,
allowing for reduction in bromide species, but the pre-treated raw water bypass flows utilized for stabilization
yield bromide concentrations, albeit minimal, in the finished water resulting in DBP formation. In reviewing
the 2016-2021 DBP compliance sampling data, bromide species DBPs attribute to high percentage of the
overall HAA5 and TTHM concentrations. Previous recommendations have been made, and implemented,
to reduce blend water flows, thereby lowering the overall bromide concentrations in the product water and
yielding reduced DBP formation. As discussed previously, there is an ongoing project to increase
membrane softening capacity and reduce blend flows at Oslo to approximately 17%. The loss in alkalinity
through reduced blend flow rate is to be offset through operational changes to increase carbonic acid
solution and caustic feed for post-treatment. This change in blend percentage should be mimicked at
Hobart to maintain consistent water quality throughout the system.
The following graphs display the LRAA and OEL values from 2016 — 2021 for the six (6) distribution sites
for TTHMs and HAA5s.
Kimley>>> Horn
Figure 13: TTHM Locational Running Annual Average (LRAA)
90
M
Page 27
70
60
50
40 --------------
30 _.
_ _..
10
Dec -14 May -16
--4-14499 US Hwy 1
—t-13180 Hwy Al A
MCL
.ol
f
Sep -17 Feb -19
5110 Indian River Blvd
5920 Old Dixie Hwy
x> w Reduced Monitoring
Figure 14: TTHM Operation Levels (OELs)
70
60
Ar -
50
40•---------- -------------
30 _.
20
Jun -20 Oct -21
1824 94th Dr
830 Schumann Dr
'l
----------
10
Dec -14 May -16 Sep -17 Feb -19 Jun -20
14499 US Hwy 1
—�-13180 Hwy Al A
MCL
5110 Indian River Blvd
5920 Old Dixie Hwy
Reduced Monitoring
..."A, 1824 94th Dr
830 Schumann Dr
Oct -21
Kim ey) Horn Page 28
Figure 15: HAA5 Locational Running Annual Average (LRAA)
70
60
50
40
20
10 .4
0
Dec -14 May -16 yep -17 Feb -19 Jun -20 Oct -21
-14499 US Hwy 1 5110 Indian River Blvd 1824 94th Dr
--�— 13180 Hwy Al 5920 Old Dixie Hwy 830 Schumann Dr
MCL p — Reduced Monitoring
Figure 16: HAA5 Operational Evaluation Levels (OELs)
70
60
50
40
30 --------------------------------------------
20
-- ------------- ----
20
10 Ak
0
Dec -14 May -16 Sep -17 Feb -19 Jun -20 Oct -21
—4-14499 US Hwy 1 5110 Indian River Blvd 1824 94th Dr
—�-13180 Hwy Al 5920 Old Dixie Hwy 830 Schumann Dr
MCL Reduced Monitoring
Kimley>»Horn
Page 29
With exception of one (one) OEL exceedance in TTHM at a single location (2017 2nd Quarter), IRCU has
maintained compliance with MCL values for TTHM and HAAFS with respect to the LRAA and the OEL.
The DBP concentrations are not low enough to trigger reduced monitoring but appear to be exhibit a
downward trend over the previous year.
The DBP sample data correlates well with the recently completed calibrated water model, where the areas
in the distribution system that exhibit higher wager age had higher concentrations of DBPs (between 144
and 168 hours). The water age map is included in Appendix A for reference.
E-
Kimley>»Horn
Page 30
90
IRCU System Water Age and Water Quality
Gray/black gooey
Yellow
'
'
® 2021_JanuaryWaterQuality_KHA
floating substance,
2021_FebruaryWaterQuality_KHA
RUSt
Brown
Brown
and residue
�+►
Black streaks,
ustomer claimed eye
,�
`'•• `
Brown and
yellow
lister from water but
Green, yellow
48
72 Brown
residuals normal
Yellow then
96
black, odor
i
120
�•
Rust
144
taste
Yellow,
Brown
Brown
-;
cloud
Odor
Black
Yellow, murky
t •.?`'
residue
Yellow,
Debris,
dirty
rust
Brown
Black
�
Yellow
Yellow
Legend
lCloudy, brown
® 2021_JanuaryWaterQuality_KHA
0 May 2020 Hydrant Testing
2021_FebruaryWaterQuality_KHA
RUSt
O 2021_MarchWaterQuality_KHA
Brown
Water Age
<all other values>
Black streaks,
CALCAGE
slime
24
Green, yellow
48
72 Brown
Yellow then
96
black, odor
i
120
Chemical
Brown
144
taste
168
Brown
'M...L&Murkydor
Brown `>t
r•, Brown/
r ji tifV,.' 3cloudy
Brown ,,�, es.. ,.s'�._ , _
g�4—lx
P
rid, customer calls every
months for flushing
Original issue unknown, Odor
flushed with WQ tested
Brown
Cloudy
Brown, odor
o
- AYellow
Purple, blue, brown; found
water heater issue
Cloudy,dirty
Deposits, copper pipe issues
Chlorine odor,
redness of eyes
Discolored
Murky, sand
Cloudy w/
chemical
odor
91
10/19/2021 12.H.1.
Indian. River County
Board of County Commissioners
DRINKING WATER STABILITY
Kimley>>> Horn
Causal Factors of Corrosion I
qI- 1
10/19/2021 12.H.1.
Matt Jordan, PE (NC) — Interim Director of IRCDUS
7Nick Black, PE— Kimley-Horn Mark Miller, PE
10 years experience Senior PM w/ 34+ years experience
Expertise in design of membrane treatment facilities a +£ Expertise in design of membrane treatment
Experience with corrosion investigations, finished facilities
water quality studies, and design of stabilization Extensive experience w/ corrosion
systems investigations, finished water quality studies,
\ \ F . Board member of SEDA 61 and design of stabilization systems
Hobart (North) WTP
• 17.14 MGD
Oslo (South) WTP
• 8.57 MGD
Treatment Processes
• Pretreatment
• Membrane Softening
• Finished Water stabilization
• Disinfection
• Distribution -
Steven J. Duranceau, PhD, PE
• 30+ years experience with expertise in water chemistry, water
quality, corrosion and corrosion control
Past president and Emeritus Director of AMTA
Founding father of SEDA
• Associate Editor, Desalination and Water Treatment
Fellow, American Institute of Chemists, Inc.
X11 - 2
1C/19/2021 12.H.1.
10/19/2021 12.H.1.
State Mandated Finished Water for pH Requirements State Mandated Finished Water Hardness Requirements
120
85
8.4 ■ Hobar M 160 Hobart
8,3 0
Oslo 80 Oslo
Low 60 ..__._ _.__.._ . -"=-__ 3 —Low
e1 —ay.
g _ __ High High
7.9 ----- 61 40
787.7
7.6 _...... p __._ _.... _....
pH Calcium Hardness
State Mandated Finished Water Alkalinity
Requirements
90
80
LEAD ACTION LEVEL
oM 70 _....._. ___.
Hobart
U 60
Oslo
a
v 50
Low
J40 _.______.r.v_m�_.. __.____-_-_—•----
_ ..
H gh
or30 _.. __. _. __........
E
20 _..__.
10
LEAD TRIGGER LEVEL
D
Alkalinn
— — — — — — — —..—
COPPER RESULTS
LEAD RESULTS
LEAD ACTION LEVEL
0.015
COPPER ACHON LEVEL
OA34
— — — e -- — —
— — — v — e
0.013
_ ..
0.012
0.011
0.9 I
LEAD TRIGGER LEVEL
0.01
— — — — — — — —..—
— — — — — —...—...i
0.009
0.6
•
s 4
�DA08
•••.•
E 0.007
-__.
•..........4.
0.006
_. ..•. •........-'..•
01005
n
•
0.004
_...
•
•
• ♦ 4
0.003
• • ':! ♦ ♦, ..�'
0.0
0402
i
'..
0.001
4
.♦..... ..... .......♦�
p1..
:............ ...... _ _:.
.. ......... .:._-_--.:
M49 Nov -10 Apr -12 Aup13 D-14 May46
Sep -17 Feb -19 Jum20 Oct -21
•••4 -••TC Utility 6 -Copper
�IRCU-Lead 0 TC Utility 1 -Lead
•••T•- TC Utility 2 -Leal
� —LCR AL
••-4-•TC Utility 3 -Lead •••4••• TC Utility 4 -Lead
••• 4••• TC Utility 5 -Lead
•••4•••TC Util" - Lead •••4• -•TC Utility 7 -Lead
TC Utility 8 -Lead
—4— LCRR Increased Monitoring — -Current AL
COPPER RESULTS
91" 4
COPPER ACHON LEVEL
13 — — — —
— — — e -- — —
— — — v — e
1.2
1.1
1.0 i.
0.9 I
�+
00.'
0.6
0.5 :.
,,.....
0.4 4 ....♦.
',.'
0.3 i4
n
•
0.2 • • °
v «.......� V ... ...4
0.0
........
Ju1-09 No,10 Apr -12
Aug -13 Dec -14 May -16
Sep -17 Feb -19 Jun -20 Oct -21
IRCV.Copper
• • 4•-- TC U011ty l -Copper
••-4---TC Utility 2 -Copper
-•4• TCUtORy3.Copper
— TC Utility 4 -Copper
•••4-•• TC Utility 5 -Copper
•••4 -••TC Utility 6 -Copper
•••4••• TC Utility 7 -Copper
•••4--- TC Utility 8 -Copper
� —LCR AL
91" 4
10/19/2021 12.H.1.
The Indian River County Department of Utility Services
REMAINS COMPLIANT with the provisions of the Safe
Drinking Water Act (SDWA), including the Lead and Copper
Rule (LCR), a federal law that protects public health by
minimizing lead (Pb) and copper (Cu) levels in drinking water,
primarily by reducing water corrosivity.
jj - 5
• Copper corrosion is a significant problem throughout United States.
• Builder who is responsible for determining materials of construction an integral
part in solving corrosion.
• Water purveyor maintain fundamental responsibility to provide adequate and
safe drinking water per SDWA (LCR).
• Florida investigated the issue 20 years ago, recommended that local governments
should consider establishment of a municipa' service taxing unit or municipal
benefit unit pursuant to F.S. 125.01(q) to help owners finance plumbing retrofits.
• The key legal case Brynwood vs. Clearwater in 1980s relieved utility of
responsibility of pitting in condo units serves as the base case for utility
defenses in Florida.
• Uniform corrosion
• Pitting corrosion
• Galvanic corrosion
• Concentration -cell corrosion
• Tuberculation
• Crevice corrosion
• Microbe -induced corrosion
• Dezincification
• Graphitization
• Stress corrosion
• Erosion -corrosion
• Stray current corrosion
10/19/2021
cv� t:►ttc.E:�ct•
corpee PlPE<'ORRo,%I )N
tt:l1'200)
Photo (left): Cast iron main blow -hole corrosion
accelerated by stray current. Note halo around
graphitized section. Louisville Water Company,
Glennon Zelch (retired).
Photo (below): Copper plumbing leakage.
Note workmanship.
w
12.H.1.
�) 6
• Water is Universal Solvent
• Three Major Categories
• Dissolution
• Abrasion
• Metabolic Activity
• Copper Pitting
• A damaging, localized corrosion
• Pits or holes in the pipe surface can
occur in water supplies that meet the
regulatory action level for copper.
• Some Specific Examples:
• Low pH water quality
• Flux Corrosion
• Workmanship
• Temperature
• Manufacturing
• Dissimilar pipe interaction
• Elevated flow velocities
• Microbiological interactions
• Stray Electrical Currents
Lightning
LOCATION
READING
House 1
150 ohm & 0.1 amp
House 2
40 ohm & 5 amp = 200 volts OUCHH
House 3
35 ohm & 0.1 amp
House 4
61 ohm & 0.2 amp
House 5
31 ohm & 0.1 amp
House 6
9 ohm & 0.2 amp
• Homeowners found it difficult to believe this was not a water
problem!! I
• Water purveyor and municipal/private water utilities are NOT
responsible for the integrity of homeowner and customer
plumbing and fixtures other than that prescribed under the lead
and copper rule (LCR).
10/19/2021
Source: The Constcuctor, 2021
S Durce: VSEPA
12.H.1.
I
• Lightning has been shown to impact corrosion of copper
tube.
• Lightning -caused pinholes are usually round with a lightly
etched halo around hole
• The pinhole penetrates from the outside to the inside.
• Orlando Utilities Commission identified lightening as a
causal factor of pitting in previous studies (Dunham and
Russell, "Electric Skies — Electric Pipes"; Florida Water
Resources Journal, February 1997)
Fixing the leak by application of external solder and/or repair clamp
Replacing a small or larger section of copper tube
Re -plumbing entire house with new copper
Re -plumbing entire house with anothe- material (PVC; CPVC; PEX)
Purchase potential cures (of questionable value such as magnets or
additional treatment systems)
Understand Fraudulent Practices
F.S. 817.558 Water Treatment Devices
10/19/2021 12.H.1.
Source: This O/c' Hou -e, 2021
c� [
Source. D.- Duranceau,1994
im
10/19/2021 12.H.1.
• The water utility is responsible to inform its customer and strengthen consumer confidence.
• Be proactive to customer concerns on pitting; have empathy
• Explain there are many causal factors of corrosion
• Politely let the customer know that the Nater purveyor's responsibility ends at meter/property line
• Know your water quality data
• Lead and Copper Rule (LCR) results— customers can have problems with pitting in home even if compliant with LCR
• Distribution system water quality; need to show quality is compliant with SDWA
• Technical information should be made available by utility
• IRCDUS remains proactively invested in drinking water infrastructure
• American Society for Testing and Materals Special Technical Publication STP 906, Baltimore, Maryland (1986).
• Bentur, A., Diamond, S., and Berke, N.S. Modern Concrete Technology 6 Steel Corrosion in Concrete: Fundamentals
and Civil Engineering Practice E&FN Spon, an imprint of Chapman and Hall, London, United Kingdom (1997).
• Broomfield, J.P. Corrosion of Steel in Concrete: Understanding, Investigation and Repair. Taylor and Francis, New
York (2006).
• Internal Corrosion of Water Distribution Systems, 2nd Edition No. 90508.
• Peabody's Control of Pipeline Corrosion, 2nd Edition, No. 20487.
• External Corrosion -Introduction to Chemistry and Control (M27), 1st Edition No. 30027.
• IRCDUS Drinking Water Quality Audit, Kimley-Horn (2021)
Disclaimer. The views and opinions of this presentation are those of the presenter and do not necessarily reflect the
views of the University of Central Florida, its Board of Trustees, or the state of Florida's Board of Governor's.
Mention of trade names or companies does not constitute endorsement.
II - 9
10/19/2021 12.H.1.
• IRCDUS remains compliant with the provisions of the SDWA
• The County will continue to actively monitor its compliance with lead and
copper regulations
• The County is proactive in receiving, acknowledging, and following up on
customer complaints
• The causal factors of plumbing failures occur mainly from issues related to
construction and modern plumbing materials
�hNT�4'
�j - 10
10/19/2021 12.H.1.
IRCU v. COVB - Lead
IRCU v. COVB - Copper
0.016
1800N
1.4
180,000
'iEAD ACTION LEVEL '�
COPPER ACTION LEVEL
0.015 b ------------------.----EA! �� ��
1.3 F — — — — w
16D)CO
•. 160,000
0.014
1.2
""'•
0.013,-•'-^'
_. 140000
1.1
140,00
0.012
10
0,011
LEAD TRIGG-R LEVEL 1207000.9
120,000
0.01 ---.—.—.—.—.-----------.----.—.—rte---.
0009: �.......+.
-, 10[000 c
J 08
".: 100,000
E o aog '•.
m
m 0.7
0.007 '..
75
.,:. 8000] o.
E
0.6
81.000
0.006 -.
•
0 6
0.005 I
60000
.-
r 60,000
0.004
••..
0.4
�................. .. �.
-- 400[0
... ...... .....................
.
0.3 '..
40.000
0.003 ..
•u.. ..........+
•.
,
0 002.
0 2
0.001
0X0
01 0 ............. ...�
....< .
�::: ..
0000
0
0.0
.............
0
Ju1-10 Nov -11 Apr -13
Aug -14 Jan -16 May -17 Oct -18 F-20 Jun -21
Jul -10 Nov -11 Apr -13
Aug -14 Jan -16 May -17
Oct -18 Feb -20
Jun -21
—•i—IRCU - Lead
•--4••-TC Utility 8 -Lead •LCCR --ed Moni—ing
—IRCU-Copper
-••4••-TC Utility 8,Copper
LCR AL
—b•Current AL
—A— IRCU - Population -4 TC Utility 8 -Population
•-•4•• TC Utility 8 -Population
--i•—IRCU- Population
0')�j -rElz p f p (,t --,s -:17 5- so (L 1241,
On September 711, 2021 the Clean Water Coalition of
Indian River County sent a letter by email to Matt Jordan
of the Indian River County Utilities Department. In that
letter concerns were raised about the apparent epidemic
of water pipes breaking in the County, and requested
that the County offer an explanation for this situation.
No response has been received to date. Upon cursory
review of the recent Water Quality Audit Report, there
appears to be a history of concerns regarding
maintaining an acceptable quality of water in the County.
The CWC formally requests that the larger issue of
excessive water pipe breaks in the County be placed on
an agenda in the near future, so that the public has an
opportunity to express concerns and be able to ask the
consultants questions. Thank you.
P�- �j N0
? - 5-s q - 142- 2-
1[-
4z2-
1l- Iz
Indian River County Utilities - Drinking Water Stability
WATER SYSTEM OVERVIEW
Water Treatment Plants
Water Plant
Improvements Timeline
a
2010 Oslo WTP
Phase H Improvements
Project
2015 Oslo and 2021 Oslo WTP
Hobart WTP Corrosion expansion Project
Investigation
0 0 0 0 O
2014 Oslo and Hobart
KTP Post Treatment
Stabilization Project
DRINKING WATER QUALITY
IRCU Finished Water Quality
State Mandated Finished Water for pH Fequirements State Mandated finished Water Hardness Requirements
ty v
PH Calcium Hardness
SUMMARY
2017 Hobart'AfTP
Membrane Replacement
Project
i
State Mandated Finished Water Alkalinity Requirements
- Low
_ .,h
E
Alkalinity
The Indian River County Utilities Department remains compliant with the provisions
of the Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA), including the Lead and Copper Rule (LCR), a
federal law that protects public health by minimizing lead (Pb) and copper (Cu) levels in
drinking water, primarily by reducing water corrosivity.
• The Indian River County Utilities Department remains compliant with the provisions of
the Safe Drinking Water Act
• The County will continue to actively monitor its compliance with lead and copper
regulations
• The County is proactive in receiving, acknowledging, and following up on customer
complaints
• The causal factors of plumbing failures occur mainly from issues related to
construction and modern plumbing materials
Kimley»)Horn
2004 Oslo WTP
Phase I Improvements
Project
0
0
2009 Hobart WTP
expansion Project
a
2010 Oslo WTP
Phase H Improvements
Project
2015 Oslo and 2021 Oslo WTP
Hobart WTP Corrosion expansion Project
Investigation
0 0 0 0 O
2014 Oslo and Hobart
KTP Post Treatment
Stabilization Project
DRINKING WATER QUALITY
IRCU Finished Water Quality
State Mandated Finished Water for pH Fequirements State Mandated finished Water Hardness Requirements
ty v
PH Calcium Hardness
SUMMARY
2017 Hobart'AfTP
Membrane Replacement
Project
i
State Mandated Finished Water Alkalinity Requirements
- Low
_ .,h
E
Alkalinity
The Indian River County Utilities Department remains compliant with the provisions
of the Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA), including the Lead and Copper Rule (LCR), a
federal law that protects public health by minimizing lead (Pb) and copper (Cu) levels in
drinking water, primarily by reducing water corrosivity.
• The Indian River County Utilities Department remains compliant with the provisions of
the Safe Drinking Water Act
• The County will continue to actively monitor its compliance with lead and copper
regulations
• The County is proactive in receiving, acknowledging, and following up on customer
complaints
• The causal factors of plumbing failures occur mainly from issues related to
construction and modern plumbing materials
Kimley»)Horn
/19
October 19, 2021
ITEM 14.A.
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
INTER -OFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: Members of the Board of County Commissioners
DATE: October 8, 2021
SUBJECT: Chapter 164 Mediation Update, October, 2021
FROM: Joseph E. Flescher, Chairman
Commissioner, District 2
BACKGROUND
On September 8, 2021, the City Council of the City of Vero Beach and the Indian River
County Board of County Commissioners participated in a joint public meeting under
Chapter 164, Florida Statutes. At that meeting, the City Council and the Board of County
Commissioners agreed to schedule at least one more meeting on this topic and to
delegate Mayor Robert Brackett, City Manager Monte Falls and City Attorney John
Turner, along with myself, County Administrator Jason Brown and County Attorney Dylan
Reingold, to attend such meetings.
On October 6, 2021, the parties participated in a meeting at the Council Chambers at the
City of Vero Beach City Hall. At the conclusion of the meeting both Mayor Brackett and
myself agreed to bring an agenc'a item back to our respective boards on October 19th to
discuss the willingness of the two elected bodies to consider further negotiation of terms
that would allow the County to serve water and wastewater to the Town of Indian River
Shores.
I seek input from my colleagues on this issue.
92
OCTOBER 19, 2021
ITEM 14.B.1
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
INTER -OFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: Members of the Board of County Commissioners
DATE: October 13, 2021
SUBJECT: Request the Board consider directing the County Attorney to start the process to
establish a Municipal Services Benefit Unit (MSBU) for the Oslo Park area to
raise funds for future road paving projects.
FROM: Peter D. O'Bryan, Vice Chairman
Commissioner, District 4
Background: For some time now, the residents of Oslo Park have been working to raise the
awareness of their community and to improve the safety and living conditions in their
neighborhood. One project was the naming of the large field next to the iG Center as "Wiggins
Field", in honor of longtime resident Joe Wiggins. Next, several years ago a street light district
was established and street lights were installed throughout the Oslo Park area providing for a
safer neighborhood. The next step for the community is establishing a funding mechanism to
raise dollars that can be applied to pave roads within the community. In discussions with staff, it
was determined that a MSBU would be an appropriate path to follow.
Current resident Lonnie Ingram has been working with the Commissioner's office and Public
Works staff on developing a funding; mechanism. According to Mr. Ingram there appears to be
support from the community to begin a process to pave roads.
The purpose of this agenda item is to give the County Attorney direction to begin the formal
process of establishing a MSBU for Oslo Park.
93
OCTOBER 19, 2021
ITEM 14.B.2
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
INTER -OFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: Members of the Board of County Commissioners
DATE: October 13, 2021
SUBJECT: Request the Board consider naming the Wabasso Scrub Conservation Area
Overlook for Joe Carroll
FROM: Peter D. O'Bryan, Vice Chairman
Commissioner, District 4
Discussion Item:
Background: Staff has reached out to the Commissioner's office for support in naming the
Wabasso Scrub Conservation Area Overlook for Joe Carroll. Joe is a former long-time
employee of the U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service here in the Indian River office. Since his
retirement, Joe has been a prominent volunteer with the County's Scrub Jay Program. In both
his professional and private life, Joe has spent decades working to preserve scrub jay habitats and
the plants and animals that live in these areas of natural resource importance.
Per County Resolution 2011-042 (procedures for commemorative works, attached) I am asking
the Board to approve naming the Wabasso Scrub Conservation Area Overlook in honor of Joe
Carroll.
94
RESOLUTION NO. 2011 - oa 2
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSION OF INDIAN RIVER
COUNTY, FLORIDA ESTABLISHING PROCEDURES, GENERAL SPECIFICATIONS
AND FEES FOR THE INSTALLATION OF COMMEMORATIVE WORKS
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commission finds it to be in the best interest of the
County to establish a consistent policy to review all applications to plant dedication trees and
install commemorative benches (collectively "Commemorative Works") at Indian River County
facilities; and
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commission seeks to enhance the beautification of
County facilities while encouraging the public to honor the County's most distinguished citizens
for their significant contributions to the local community; and
WHEREAS, the purpose of this Resolution is to establish: (1) procedures and general
criteria for the review of Commcmorative Works applications; (2) fees that shall be paid by all
applicants for the procurement and installation of Commemorative Works.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of
Indian River County, Florida that:
SECTION I. DEFINITION OF COMMEMORATIVE WORKS; PROCEDURES AND GENERAL
CRITERIA FOR THE REVIEW OF COMMEMORATIVE WORKS APPLICATIONS.
A. Definition of Commemorative Work
Commemorative Work shall be defined as dedicated tree or bench installed in recognition of
individuals, groups, or organizations.
B. Anylication for Installation of Commemorative Works
An application for dedication of a Commemorative Work, accompanied by the applicable
procurement and installation fees, shall be filed with the Director of Public Works. The
application shall identify the preferred location of the Commemorative Work and select the form
of a dedication tree or bench and whether a tree dedication plaque or bench engraving is desired.
The application shall be filed on the form prescribed by the County and may be obtained from
the County website, Department of Public Works, or Parks Division of the Department of
General Services.
C. Application Review by, County Staff
All applications to install Commemorative Works shall be reviewed by the Public Works
Director or his designee together with County staff from the applicable County Department
charged with maintaining the facility. In evaluating a Commemorative Work application, the
Public Works Director or his designee shall make best efforts to accommodate the location
preferred by the applicant, however, the standard of review must emphasize the overall
95
RESOLUTION N0.2011 - 042
beautification of the designated County facility and be consistent with the existing landscape
design and facility improvements.
D. Dedication Plaque Specifications
If a dedication plaque is desired by the applicant, the plaque shall be a cast bronze type with
raised letters and border, with a standard size of approximately five inches wide by seven inches
long (5" x 7") by two hundredth inches (.02') thick and installed at the base of the tree or affixed
to the bench. Variations in plaque dimensions may be approved by the Public Works Director or
his designee in order to maintain consistency with existing facility amenities.
E. En raving of a Dedication Bench
If an engraved dedication bench is desired by the applicant, the application shall include the
desired language of an appropriate nature not to exceed 32 characters centered on a 6 foot bench
or 43 characters centered on an 8 foot bench. The content of the engraved message shall be
subject to approval by the Public Works Director or his designee as part of the application review
process.
F. Requests For Name Dedications or Nonconforming Commemorative Works
Special requests for name dedications or commemorative works outside of the policy may be
considered by Board of County Commission on a case by case basis. Only the Board of County
Commission is authorized to grant a name dedication or exception to this policy upon a showing
of special circumstance or good cause as presented and sponsored by a County Commissioner
holding office.
SECTION 2. ADOPTION OF FEES FOR THE PROCUREMENT AND INSTALLATION OF
COMMEMORATIVE WORKS.
A. Costs & Fees:
The cost to the applicant to install a Commemorative Work and Dedication Plaque shall be based
on current cost to the County for the requested Commemorative Work. The costs and fees shall
include:
1. Procurement of Commemorative Work: Actual Cost
2. Dedication Plaque (Optional): Actual Cost
3. Bench Engraving (Optional): Actual Cost
4. Installation Fee
$100
Payment of the Commemorative Work Procurement and Installation Fees shall be made at the
time the application is filed. The procurement fee shall be refunded to the applicant if the
application is not approved by the Public Works Director or his designee.
96
RESOLUTION NO. 2011 - 042
B. Use of Procurement and Installation Fees
The funds collected for the Procurement Fees shall be deposited into the County's General Fund
and applied to the Department incurring the procurement cost as a direct reimbursement for the
cost of procurement. The Installation Fees shall be deposited into the County's General Fund to
offset the labor cost associated with the installation of the Commemorative Work at the facilities
upon which they are displayed.
C. Replacement of Dedication Trees:
If a Dedication Tree dies within one year of its planting date, the County shall make one
replacement of such Dedication Tree only if sufficient funds are available. Any replacement
Dedication Tree shall meet the standard set forth by Section 1(C). Replacement of a Dedication
Tree by the County shall not include replacement of a damaged or destroyed Dedication Plaque
which may be funded by the Applicant to cover the actual cost at the time of replacement.
SECCION 3. ADOPTION
The foregoing resolution was moved for adoption by Commissioner F1 escher
and Seconded by Commissioner Davis , and was voted upon as follows:
Bob Solari, Chairman Aye
Gary C. Wheeler, Vice Chairman Aye
Peter D. O'Bryan, Commissioner Aye
Wesley S. Davis, Commissioner Aye
Joseph E. Flescher, Commissioner Aye
The Chairman there upon declared the resolution duly passed and adopted this 2ALhday of
May, 2021.
ATTEST: Jeffrey K. Barton
Clerk of Court
By
Deputy Clerk
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
aNDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
-702:2:�
Bob Solari, Chairman
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGAL SUFFICIENCY
BY: Lam{ ✓
Alan S. Kladmichmy'Atto'Key
3
97
Environmental Control Board__, ,
z OG�a Office of the
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
\** ADMINISTRATOR
\�ORVD''
Jason E. Brown, County Administrator
Michael C. Zito, Assistant County Administrator
MEMORANDUM
TO: Members of the Board
of County Commissioners
FROM: Jason E. Brown
County Administrator
DATE: October 12, 2021
SUBJECT: Appointment of Environmental Control Officer
Background
The current Environmental Control Hearing Board (ECHB) Officer, Cheryl Dunn, is retiring at the end
of the year and plans to take leave beginning October 29, 2021.
Chapter 85-427, Laws of Florida, section 6, states that the "Board shall appoint an Environmental
Control Officer. In so doing, the Board shall consider the recommendation of the County Health
Director. The Board shall give due consideration to the qualifications and experience of said applicant
in the field of environmental control."
The County Health Director recommends Julianne Price to fill this position. Her resume and a letter of
recommendation are included for your consideration.
Fundin
There are no funding considerations with this item.
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends that the Board discuss and consider the appointment of Julianne Price to the position
of Environmental Control Officer.
108
Mission:
To protect, promote & improve the health
of all people in Florida through integrated
state, county & community efforts.
Date
Vision: To be the Healthiest State in the Nation
October 11, 2021
Re: Appointment for Environmental Control Officer
Dear Indian River County Board of County Commissioners:
Ron DeSantis
Governor
Joseph A. Ladapo, MD, PhD
State Surgeon General
The current Environmental Control Hearing Board (ECHE) Officer, Cheryl Dunn, is retiring at the end of
the year and plans to take leave beginning October 29, 2021. To provide for a seamless transition for
this position, I am strongly recommending the appointment of Julianne Price, R.S, as the new
Environmental Control Officer effective October 29, 2021.
Julianne has over 20 years of experience and expertise in the environmental health field and has
agreed to assume the position. She is well known to our community as a dedicated public servant and
is well equipped to serve as the Environmental Control Officer.
If you have any questions or concerns, please feel free to contact me directly at 772-794-7452.
Sincerely,
Miranda Hawker, MPH
DOH- Indian River Health Officer
Florida Department of Health
In Indian River County
1900 27th Street, Vero Beach, FL 32960 Accredited Health Department
PHONE: 7721794-7400 Public Health Accreditation Bpgq
WEBSITE: http:/findiandver.floddahealth.gov
FloridaHealth.gov
Julianne Price, R S.
21791001 Ave.
Vero Beach, FL 32960
772-713-6883 CeIV 772-794-7445 Work
Julianne.Price@flhealth.gov
Education
I attended the University of North Carolina at Asheville and earned a Bachelor of Science Degree
in Environmental Studies with a Natural Resource Management Focus. I am a graduate of the
Center for Disease Control's Environmental Public Health Leadership Institute and have taken
master level courses from the University of South Florida.
Licenses/certifications
I hold certifications from the Florida Department of Health in numerous areas including food
service, biomedical waste, and onsite sewage and disposal to include permitting and inspections. I
also am accredited as a Registered Sanitarian (R.S.) and am part of the emergency response strike
team for FL.
Professional Experience
I have been employed by the Florida Department of Health in Indian River (DOH -IR) since
January 2004, initially as an Environmental Specialist. In July 2020, I assumed the duties of
Environmental Health Manager at DOH -IR to lead and supervise the DOH -IR Environmental
Health Division. My duties also include supervision over accreditation, community health
improvement planning and serving as the Statewide PACE EH Coordinator for the Florida
Department of Health since 2006. My early experience as a park ranger assistant in Washington
state helped ignite my passion for protecting our environment and safeguarding our communities
which collectively has led to over 20 years of experience in the field.
Publications and Research
I have been involved in securing over $40 million of grants for communities in FL. Please view
the Indian River County link at: htty://www.floridahealth.noy/healthy-environments/pace-eh/index.html
Florida Journal of Environmental Health, June 2004, June 2005, April 2007
Journal of Environmental Health, May 2008, Sept. 2009, April 2012, October 2013
Awards
"Rookie of the Year," August 2006, Florida Environmental Health Association
"Jim Parker Award," June 2005, NACCHO-ASTHO
The Jim Parker Award recognizes and encourages initiatives to establish and improve
collaboration between state and local health departments.
5 Davis Productivity Awards, 2007, 2008, 2009, 20109 2012
Featured in the Public Health Grand Rounds, May 2007
Harvard's Bright Idea Award for Innovation
"Complete award listing available upon request"
Professional organizations and community service
National Environmental Health Association, since 2008
Indian River County Affordable Housing Advisory Committee, since 2008
Every Dream Has A Price, President, Feb. 2008-2021
Coalition for Attainable Homes, President 1/2021 -current
DOH Environmental Public Health Tracking Advisory Board, since 2005
NACCHO Environmental Health Advisory Board Chair since June 2013 -June 2018
"Complete list of organization and community service available upon request"
110
10/12/21, 12:15 PM Indian River County, FL Code of Ordinances
CHAPTER 85-427
HOUSE BILL NO. 666
An act relating to Indian River County; creating the Indian River County EnvironmentAlontrol Board;
providing short title; providing for decla,-ation of intent; providinglefinitions; providing for an
environmental control board; p,oviding organizationduties, and powers; providing for environmental
control officer appointment, dutiesand powers; providing limitations; providing for hearing board
organization, duties,and powers; providing for appeals from actions or decisions of environmental
control officers; providing procedure; providing for civil enforcement; providing for enforcemeraf
hearing board orders and injunctive relief, providing civil penalties; providin[pr civil fines to be liens;
providing for refusal to obey subpoenas; providing foiconstruction in relation to other law; providing
severability; providing an effectivedate.
Be It Enacted by the Legislature of the State of Florida:
Section 1. Short Title. This act shall be known and may be cited as the "Indian RiveTounty Environmental Control
Act."
Section 2. Declaration of Legislative Intent. The Legislature finds and declares thane reasonable control of activities
which are causing or may cause pollution or contaminatiorof the environment is necessary for the protection and
preservation of the purposeof this act to authorize the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River Coun4tting as
the Indian River County Environmental Control Board to provide and maintaifor the citizens and visitors of said county
standards which will insure sanitarypractice and freedom of the environment from contaminants or synergistic agents
injurious to human, plant, or animal life, or which unreasonably interfere with the comfortablenjoyment of life or
property, or the conduct of business.
Section 3. Definitions. The following words as used in this act shall have the followinlgleanings:
(1) "Environment" shall include, but not be limited to, man's surroundings which affedtuman health and
welfare, plant or animal life, and the reasonable enjoyment of lifer property, or the conduct of business.
(2) "Pollution" is the presence in tie environment of any one or more substances or contaminants
quantities which are or may be potentially harmful or injurious to human healtbr welfare, animal or
plant life, or property, or unreasonably interfere with thEenjoyment of life or property.
(3) "Contaminant" is any substance which is harmful to plant, animal, or human life.
(4) "Board" shall mean the Indian River County Environmental Control Board.
(5) "Persons" shall be construed to include any natural person, individual, public clarivate corporation, firm,
association, joint venture, partnership, municipalitygovernmental agency, political subdivision, public
officer or any other entity whatsoeveror any combination of such, jointly or severally.
(6) "Hearing Board" means the Indian River County Environmental Control Hearing Board.
(7) "County Health Director" means the Director of the Indian River County Health Departmerex his duly
authorized representative.
(8) "Violation of this act" shall mean violation of the terms of this act or violatioof any county ordinance
regarding environmental control or rule of the EnvironmentaControl Board promulgated hereunder or
violation of any law of the state or rule ofa state agency, including the Department of Environmental
111
1/7
10/12/21, 12:15 PM Indian River County, FL Code of Ordinances
Regulation and the Departmentof Health and Rehabilitative Services, pertaining to environmental control
or violation of a Hearing Board Order.
(9) "Rule" means the whole or a pat of the Board's statement of general or particula3pplicability and future
effect designed to implement, interpret, or prescribe lavor policy or describing the organization,
procedure, or practice requirements of theBoard.
Section 4. Indian River County Environmental Control Board; Organization.
(1) The Board is established pursuant to this act and shall consist of the five memberaf the Board of County
Commissioners of Indian River County who shall serve withoutompensation.
(2) The presence of three members of the Board shall constitute a quorum necessary tbold a meeting and
take any action. A majority vote of the membership shall be necessarjro take any action. The members
of the Board shall annually elect a chairman who shalterve at the will of the Board. The chairman may
call meetings of the Board, and meetingsmay be called by written notice signed by three members, and
the Board at any meetingmay fix and call a meeting on a future date. Minutes shall be kept of all
meetings of the Board. All meetings shall be public.
Section 5. Environmental Control Board; Duties and Powers. The Board shall have thfDllowing duties, functions,
powers, and responsibilities.
(1) The Board shall adopt, revise, and amend from time to time appropriate rules necessarfpr the
implementation and effective enforcement, administration, and interpretatioof the provisions of this
act, and shall provide for the effective and continuingontrol and regulation of the environment in the
county within the framework of thisact. When approved by the Board and filed with the Clerk of the
Board of County Commissioners,and adopted as per the following, such rules shall have the force and
effect of law:
(a) Prior to the adoption, amendment, or repeal of any such rule, the Board shall givpublic notice of its
intended action, setting forth a short and plain explanatiorof the purpose and effect of the proposed
rule, and a summary of the proposed ruleand shall cite this act as specific legal authority under
which its adoption is authorized.The notice shall contain the location where the text of the proposed
rule can be obtainedif such text is not included in the notice. The notice shall be mailed to persons
who have made requests o- the Board for advance notice of its proceedings at Iea51t4 days prior to
such mailing. Notice shall be given by publication at least oncel 5 days in advance, in a newspaper of
general circulation in the County.
(b) Any person regulated by the Board or having a substantial interest in a Board rulfnay petition the
Board to adopt, amend, or repeal or rule. The petition shall specifyhe proposed rule and action
requested. Not later than 30 calendar days after thaiate of filing a petition, the Board shall initiate
rulemaking proceedings under thisact, otherwise comply with the requested action, or deny the
petition with a writtenstatement of its reasons for the denial. In addition, the Board shall require
from those proposing a rule or change an estimate of the economic impact of the proposed.ile on
all persons affected by it.
(c) The Board shall keep a complete record of all rulemaking proceedings. In such proceedingtbe
Board may take notice of any material which may be judicially noticed, withodUrther proof thereof,
and it shall provide that materials so recognized and any evidencpresented shall be incorporated
112
2/7
10/12/21, 12:15 PM
Indian River County, FL Code of Ordinances
into the record of the proceedings. The Board, irrulemaking proceedings, shall not be bound by strict
rules of evidence and procedure.
(d) The Board shall comply with the rules and procedure of the County Commission unlessther rules
are adopted to govern proceedings
(e) The Board, at the conclusion of the public hearing, shall adopt, reject, or adop#s amended a rule.
Such rule shall be filed with the Clerk of the Board of Countfommissioners.
(f) The proposed rule shall become effective 20 days after being filed or on a later datepecified in the
rule. After the notice required in paragraph (a) and prior to adoptiorthe Board may withdraw the
rule, and may make such cl anges in the ordinance or rules are supported by the record of public
hearings held on the rule and technical changesvhich do not affect the substance of the rule.
Changes supported by the record ofa hearing may include withdrawal of the rule in whole or in part.
After a rule hasbeen adopted, it may be repealed or amended only through regular rulemaking
procedures.
(2) The Board may make continuing studies and periodic reports and recommendations fdfie
improvements of environmental control in the county, and establish air, wategnd environmental quality
standards in the county, and shall work in cooperation withhe appropriate state and federal agencies
interested in the field of environmentakontrol.
(3) The Board may adopt a seal and alter it.
(4) The Board may perform such other duties, functions, and responsibilities as may becomieecessary to
contribute to improvement in the control of the environment in IndiaRiver County.
Section 6. Environmental Control Officers; Appointment. The Board shall appoint abnvironmental Control Officer.
In so doing, the Board shall consider the reccmmendatioref the County Health Director. The Board shall give due
consideration to the qualificationsand experience of said applicant in the field of environmental control.
Section 7. Environmental Control Officer; Duties and Powers. The duties, function$lowers, and responsibilities of
the Environmental Control Officer shall include thd-ollowing:
(1) In cooperation with the County Health Director, enforcing the provisions of this ac#nd county
ordinances, adopting enforcement procedures provided herein, and rulepromulgated, and all laws of
the state and rules of state agencies, including thd)epartment of Environmental Regulation and the
Department of Health and RehabilitativeServices, pertaining to environmental control.
(2) Conducting investigations and recommending legal proceedings to abate violations dfiis act in
accordance with the law of the State of Florida and the provisions cdhis act.
(3) Cooperating with industry, business, institutions, governmental agencies, and othdnterested parties in
accomplishing effective environmental control.
(4) Publicizing and disseminating information to the public concerning the environmerEtnd recommending
methods for its control.
(5) Enlisting and encouraging public support, and the assistance of civic, tech nicatcientific, and educational
organizations, and the cooperation of industrial and businesenterprises and organizations.
(6) Making periodic reports conte-ning the status of the environment in Indian River Count�nd the
enforcement of the provisions of this act and recommendations concerning th'snprovement of
environmental control. Such reports shall be filed with the Board andbe made available to oTf3
3/7
10/12/21, 12:15 PM Incian River County, FL Code of Ordinances
governmental agencies which may be interested.
(7) Exercising additional powers to be described hereunder.
Section 8. Limitations. The Board may not adopt or enforce any rule relating to:
(1) Agricultural operations in the growing, harvesting, or processing of crops and thmising of fowls or
animals.
(2) Use of equipment in the performance of such agricultural operations.
(3) Barbecue equipment or outdoor fireplaces used for noncommercial purpose.
(4) Agricultural land clearing operations or agricultural land grading.
(5) Incinerators and heating equipment in Cr used in connection with residences used exclusive
dwellings for not more than four families.
(6) Fires set or permitted by any public officer, board, council, or commission when sucfire is set or
permission given in the performance of such duty of the officer, boartouncil, or commission for the
purpose of weed abatement, the prevention or eliminatiorof the fire hazard, or the instruction of
employees in the methods of firefightingwhich is in the opinion of such officer, board, council, or
commission necessary,or from fires set pursuant to permit for purpose of instruction of employees of
private industrial concerns in methods of firefighting, or for civil defense instruction.
(7) The use of orchard or citrus grove heaters which do not produce unconsumed solid carbonaceoLmatter
at a rate in excess of 1 gram per minute.
(8) Odors emanating from agricultural operations in the growing, harvesting, or processingf crops or
raising of fowls or animals.
(9) Projects of the Department of Transportation.
(10) Water Control Districts as governed by the provisions of Chapter 298, Florida Statutes.
(11) Mosquito Control Districts.
Section 9. Hearing Board; Organization. The Board shall appoint a five -member Hearingoard, the members of
which shall have the following qualifications and terms of office:
(1) Members of the Hearing Board shall be residents and registered voters of the CountNembers of the
Hearing Board, while serving, shall not become candidates for the electiot►o any public office, nor hold
any other appointive office or position under federalstate, county, or municipal government, except for
an office or position on a govern mentaboard having advisory powers only. Appointments shall be made
by the Board on thebasis of experience or interest in the field of environmental control. The composition
and representative membership of the Hearing Board shall be as follows:
(a) One member shall be a lawyer (duly licensed to practice law in the State of Florida)ecommended to
the Board by the County Bar Association.
(b) One member shall be a medical doctor, recommended to the Board by the County Medicbbciety.
(c) One member shall be an engineer, recommended to the Board.
(d) Two members shall be citizens not holding elective office.
(2) The members of the Hearing Board shall elect a chairman. The presence of three amore members shall
constitute a quorum of the Hearing Board. A majority vote of thenembership shall be necessary to take
any action. Members shall serve without compensationbut may be reimbursed for such tra\f?14cpenses,
4/7
10/12/21, 12:15 PM Indian River County, FL Code of Ordinances
mileage expenses, and/or per diemexpenses as may be authorized by the Board. The chairman may call
hearings by the Hearing Board and hearings may be called by written notice signed by at least three
members of the Hearing Board and the Hearing Board at any hearing may fix and call hearing on a
future date. Minutes shall be kept of all hearings by the Hearing BoarcAll hearings shall be public. The
Board of County Commissioners shall provide adequatmnd competent clerical and administrative
personnel as may be reasonably requiredby the Hearing Board for the proper performance of its duties.
Section 10. Hearing Board; Duties and Powers. The Tearing Board shall have the followinguties, functions, powers,
and responsibilities:
(1) To hear appeals by persons aggrieved by actions or decisions of the Environmentffiontrol Officer not
already referred to the state attorney for criminal prosecution) onsider the facts material to such
appeals, and render a decision promptly. SucMecision must affirm, reverse, or modify the action or
decision appealed from, providedthat such decision shall not be in conflict with the provisions of this act
(2) To conduct due process hearings into the merits of alleged violations of this act.
(3) To issue, after due process hearing, injunctive orders, including orders providinfpr affirmative relief,
against persons found to be in violatior: of this act.
(4) After due public hearing upholding a violation, to reach a decision setting forthuch findings of fact and
conclusions of law as are requi-ed in view of the issue resented. The decision shall contain an order
which may be framed in the manner ofa writ of injunction requiring the violator to conform with either
or both of thefollowing, requirements:
(a) To refrain from committing, creating, maintaining, or permitting the violation.
(b) To take such affirmative action as the Hearing Board deems necessary and reasonablender the
circumstances to correct such violation.
(5) To issue orders imposing civil penalties of up to $500 for each day of violation again!tersons found to
have violated this act.
(6) To issue subpoenas to command the appearance of any person before a hearing at a specifiedme and
place to be examined as a witness. Sucn subpoenas may require such persoto produce all books,
papers, and documents in his possession or under his controhaterial to such hearings.
(7) To administer oaths to any or all persons who are to testify before the Hearing Board.
(8) To adopt rules for the conduct of its hearings not inconsistent with the provisionsf this act.
Section 11. Appeals from Actions or Decis ons of Environmental Control Officer; ProcedurAny persons aggrieved by
an action or decision of the Environmental Control Officenot already referred to the state attorney for criminal
prosecution may appeal tothe Hearing Board by filing, within 10 days after the date of the action or decision
complained of a written notice of appeal which shall set forth concisely the actioor decision appealed from and the
reasons or grounds for the appeal. The Hearing Boarcthall set such appeal for hearing at the earliest possible date,
and cause noticethereof to be served upon the appellant and the Environmental Control Office.
Section 12. Criminal Enforcement; Procedure.
(1) Whenever the Environmental Control Officer has received or obtained evidence tha#specific violation of
this act which constitutes a crime has been committed, th(Environmental Control Officer may notify the
state attorney of Indian River Countyof such violation. Such notice shall contain a description of the
violation, the dateof the violat'on, the location of the violation, and the name and address of 14 violator.
5/7
10/12/21, 12:15 PM
Indian River County, FL Code of Ordinances
(2) Upon receipt of such notice, the state attorney may institute proceedings in the criminaburt of record for
prosecution of the violation.
Section 13. Civil Enforcement; Procedure.
(1) It shall be the duty of the County Health Director, with the advice and assistancef the Environmental
Control Officer, to determine compliance with the terms of thiact.
(2) If any person is in violation of the provisions of this act, the County Health Directonay give the violator
reasonable time, by formal notice, within which to correct suclniolation. Should the violation continue
beyond the time specified for correctionthe County Health Director shall notify the Environmental
Control Officer in writingof such failure to correct the violation. If any person has been in violation of this
act for conducting an activity without benefit of or in violation of the terms of required permit, or has
been in violation of this act for conducting an activitywhich resulted in environmental damage or public
health threat, the County HealthDirector, in lieu of or in addition to the above procedure for formal
notice, may notify the Environmental Control Officer in writing of the violation.
(3) Upon the County Health Director's notice of a failure to correct violation or noticef an activity conducted
without or in violation of a required permit, or an unlawfulctivity which resulted in environmental
damage or a public health threat, the EnvironmentaControl Officer shall notify the Hearing Board which
shall, within 45 days after suchnotice, order the violator to appear before it to show cause why he should
not be required to correct the violation and pay civil penalties. Any hearing shall be conducteoh
accordance with section 10 of this act.
(4) If after due process hearing the Hearing Board upholds the violation, the Hearin§oard shall reach a
decision setting forth findings of fact and such conclusions ofaw as are required in view of the issues
submitted. Such decisions shall be renderedn accordance with sections 10 and 15 of this act.
Section 14. Enforcement of Hearing Board Orders and Injunctive Relief. If preventiver corrective measures are not
taken or any civil penalty imposed is not forfeitedn accordance with any order of the Hearing Board, or if the
Environmental ControlOfficer finds that a vio'ation of the provisions of this act exists so as to createn emergency
requiring immediate action to protect humar. health or welfare, or tprevent irreparable environmental damage, the
Environmental Control Officer may institutEproceedings in the circuit court for Indian River County to abate violations
of this act or enforce orders of the Hearing Board. Such relief may include both temporarynd permanent injunctions.
Any proceedings initiated under this section shall be broughfor and in the name of Indian River County.
Section 15. Violations; Civil Penalties. Any person found by the Hearing Board the or have been in violation of this
act may have imposed against him a civil penaltylot to exceed $500 for each day of violation. In determining the
amount of such civilpenalty, the Hearing Board shall consider the nature, duration, and environ mentafnpact of such
violation. The Hearing Board shall incorporate the amount of the penaltynposed in its final decision and order finding
such person in violation. All civilpenalties collected under this section shall be paid into the general fund of India River
County.
Section 16. Civil Fines to be Liens. Any fine imposed by order of the Hearing Boardhall, upon expiration of the time
for appeal and the filing of said order with therlerk of the circuit court, become a statutory lien against any and all
property of the respondent.
Section 17. Refusal to Obey Subpoena Issued by the Hearing Board.
(1) Whenever any person duly subpoenaed to appear and give evidence or to produce anlyooksla * papers
6/7
10/12/21, 12:15 PM Ind an River County, FL Code of Ordinances
before the Hearing Board neglects or refuses to appear, or to produceny books or papers, as required
by the subpoena, or refuses to testify or to answeeny question which the Hearing Board decides is
proper and pertinent, he shall bedeemed in contempt, and the Hearing Board shall report the fact to the
judge of the circuit court for the district in which the person resides.
(2) Upon receipt of the report, the judge, of the circuit court may issue an order directeth the sheriff of
Indian River County commanding the sheriff to forthwith bring suclperson before the judge who entered
the order.
(3) On the return of the order and the production of the body of the person charged, thperson charged
may purge himself of contempt in the same way and the same proceedingshall be had, and the same
penalties may be imposed, and the same punishment inflictecbs in the case of a witness subpoenaed to
appear and give evidence on the trial ofa civil cause before a circuit court of the state.
Section 18. Construction in Relation to Other Law. It is the purpose of this act tprovide additional cumulative
remedies to control the environment of this countyNothing contained herein shall be construed to abridge or alter
rights of action orremedies in equity under the common law or statutory law, criminal or civil, nor shaAny provisions
of this act, or any act done by virtue thereof, be construed as estoppinghe state or any municipality or person affected
by environmental pollution, in theexercise of its or his rights in equity or under common law or statutory law to
suppress nuisances to abate environmental pollution.
Section 19. Powers of Health Department. Nothing in this act shall limit or reducthe powers of the Indian River
County Health Department pursuant to interlocal agreementgeneral or special law, or any other source of authority.
Section 20. If any provisions of this act or the application thereof to any personar circumstances is held invalid,
such invalidity shall not affect other provisiongDr applications of the act which can be given effect without the invalid
provision or application, and to this end the provisions of this act are declared severable.
Section 21. This act shall take effect 30 days after becoming a law.
Became a law without the Governor's approval.
Filed in Office Secretary of State June 7, 1985.
117
7/7
SWDD Item
Indian River County, Florida
Solid Waste Disposal District
Board Memorandum
Date: October 8, 2021
To: Jason E. Brown, County Administrator
From: Matthew Jordan, Interim Director of Utility Services
Prepared By: Himanshu H. Mehta, PE, Managing Director, Solid Waste Disposal District
Subject: Work Order No. 45 to Kimley Horn and Associates for Landfill Automated Scale System
Descriptions and Conditions:
The Indian River County (IRC) Solid Waste Disposal District (SWDD) utilizes an in -bound and an out -bound
scale system to track all incoming and outgoing materials at the IRC landfill. Deliveries include a
combination of private (residential) drop-offs, commercial haulers (ex. construction and demolition debris
and landscaping contractors), and municipal haulers that service the unincorporated County and
municipalities. SWDD is proposing to add an automated, unmanned, in -bound bypass scale that would
allow the municipal haulers and certain commercial haulers that have accounts set up with SWDD to
automatically weigh-in, drop off, and then exit, with the net weight delivered calculated based on pre-
recorded tare weight for that particular truck. This will improve service efficiency for SWDD customers
and reduce cue -time for these account holders.
To facilitate this project, staff requested a proposal from Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. (KHA) to provide
design, procurement, and construction services for the project.
Analysis:
Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. has prepared Work Order No. 45, per the Continuing Consulting
Engineering Services Agreement for Professional Services, provided in Attachment 1, for engineering
services detailing the scope of work, budget, and schedule for each of the tasks. The tasks are listed below
showing the scope and their estimated fees. The project is estimated to take 11 months to completion.
PHASE 1
DESCRIPTION
TOTAL AMOUNT
Task 1
Preliminary Design
$ 10,850
Task 2
Design
$ 24,320
Task 3
Permitting
$ 7,540
Task 4
Bidding
$ 6,300
Task 5
Constructior Phase Services
$ 21,720
Task 6
Record Drawings
$ 2,700
TOTAL =
$ 73,430
SWDD Agenda - Work Order No 45 to Kimley Horn - Automated Scale System Page 1 of 2'
SWDD Item
The six phases outlined above provide a turnkey engineering project from design, permitting,
procurement, to construction services. KHA will coordinate with SWDD staff and Mettler Toledo (current
scale vendor) to select the appropriate automated scale for landfill application and utilize the same scale
manufacturer for integration of instrumentation and controls. Staff is recommending that we continue to
utilize Mettler Toledo as our sole source scale vendor for the new automated scale system to match the
existing two (2) scale system and controls on-site. Including the engineering costs, the overall project
includes the purchase and installation of the automated scale system, and the associated paving and
drainage improvements, with a total budgetary estimate of $600,000.
Funding:
Funding for the SWDD Landfill Automated Scale System project is budgeted and available in the Landfill
Capital Account, number 411-166002, for a total amount of $600,000, which is funded from SWDD
assessments and user fees. The amount of $73,430 for KHA Work Order 45 will be drawn from this
account.
Description
Account Number
Amount
Other Equipment
411-166002
$73,430
Recommendation:
Solid Waste Disposal District (SWDD) staff recommends that its Board approve the following:
a) Authorize the use of Mettler Toledo as the sole -source vendor for the automated scales.
b) Approve Work Order No. 45 with Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. for $73,430 to provide engineering
services related to the Landfill Automated Scale System.
c) Authorize the Chairman to execute the same, as presented.
Attachment:
1. Work Order No. 45 — KHA
QQ
SWDD Agenda - Work Order No 45 to Kimley Horn - Automated Scale System Page 2 of 29
CCNA2018 WORK ORDER 45
AUTOMATED SCALE SYSTEM
This Work Order Number 45 is entered into as of this _ day of , 2021, pursuant to
that certain Continuing Consulting Engineering Services Agreement for Professional Services entered
into as of the 18th day of May, 2021 (the "Agreement"), by and between INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, a
political subdivision of the State of Florida ("COUNTY") and Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.
("Consultant").
The COUNTY has selected the Consultant to perform the professional services set forth on
Exhibit A (Scope of Work), attached to this Work Order and made part hereof by this reference. The
professional services will be performed by the Consultant for the fee schedule set forth in Exhibit B
(Fee Schedule), attached to this Work Order and made a part hereof by this reference. The Consultant
will perform the professional services within the timeframe more particularly set forth in Exhibit C
(Time Schedule), attached to this Work Order and made a part hereof by this reference all in
accordance with the terms and provisions set forth in the Agreement. Pursuant to paragraph 1.4 of the
Agreement, nothing contained in any Work Order shall conflict with the terms of the Agreement and
the terms of the Agreement shall be deemed to be incorporated in each individual Work Order as if
fully set forth herein.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Work Order as of the date first
written above.
CONSULTANT:
Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.
By:
Brian Good, P.E.
Print Name:
Title: Senior Vice President
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
By:
Joseph E. Flescher, Chairman
BCC Approved Date:
Attest: Jeffrey R. Smith, Clerk of Court and Comptroller
By:
Deputy Clerk
Approved:
Jason E. Brown, County Administrator
Approved as to form and legal sufficiency:
Dylan T. Reingold, County Attorney 100
WORK ORDER NUMBER 45
AUTOMATED SCALE SYSTEM
EXHIBIT A
SCOPE OF WORK
PROJECT UNDERSTANDING
Indian River County (County) solid waste disposal district (SWDD) operates a Class I
municipal solid waste landfill, that utilizes a single entrance scale for monitoring and
tracking incoming loads and tonnages of material delivered. Deliveries include a
combination of private (residential) drop-offs, commercial haulers (ex. landscaping
contractors) and municipal haulers that service the unincorporated County and
municipalities. The County is proposing to add an automated, unmanned, inbound bypass
scale that would allow the municipal haulers and commercial haulers that have accounts
set up with SWDD to automatically weigh in, drop off and then exit, with the net weight
delivered calculated off of pre-recorded tare weight for that particular truck.
Kimley-Horn ("Consultant") will prepare construction documents and a bid package for
the installation of a bypass scale (to match existing scale provider), approach and exit
ramps, entry road modifications (paving, striping, signage), drainage modifications, new
bypass lane and traffic control arm (relocate existing), railing as needed, configuration of
unattended weigh terminal (electrical and integration of instrumentation/programming by
others), and relocation of existing or addition of new weight display sign, as needed. The
Consultant will also provide construction observation services as outlined in the following
Scope of Services.
SCOPE OF SERVICES
Task 1: Preliminary Design Activities
This task will include a kickoff meeting with SWDD staff to discuss project objectives,
scope, schedule and coordination of tasks not included in this Scope of Services (i.e.
environmental and operational impacts).
Consultant will coordinate with Mettler Toledo (current scale vendor) to select/confirm the
appropriate scale for this application, around which the design will be tailored. It is
important to utilize the same scale manufacturer for integration with the current
instrumentation and controls. The Consultant anticipates the use of a Mettler Toledo
VTC251 concrete deck truck scale and unattended weigh terminal. Coordination for final
selection will be completed prior to commencing the Task 2 Design services.
Preliminary design will also include the collection of applicable geotechnical (soil boring)
and survey data to serve as the basis of design. The Consultant will subcontract with local
101
Page I of 7
consultants who routinely perform work for the County on the SWDD property to perform
these services.
Task 2: Design Services
The Consultant will prepare the design documents associated with the site/civil (paving,
grading, drainage, signage), structural (foundation review (by others), railings, subgrade
stabilization), electrical, instrumentation (limited to weight sign and conduit runs for
automated terminal (equipment and integration by others)), demolition, tree relocations and
site restoration. The anticipated sheet index for the plan set is anticipated as follows:
Cover/Index
G-1 Legends, Symbols and Abbreviations
G-2 General and Project Notes
G-3 Utility Notes and Specifications
G-4 Geotechnical Notes and Specifications
G-5 Boundary Survey
G-8 Key Plan
C-1 Existing Conditions
C-2 Proposed Site Plan
C-3 Erosion Control Plan
C-4 Stormwater PPP
C-5 Master Utility Plan
C-6 Site Geometry — Site Entrance
C-7 Site Geometry — Scales
C-8 Paving, Grading and Drainage Plan
C-9 Paving, Grading and Drainage Plan
C-10 Onsite Roadway Improvements
C-11 Onsite Roadway Improvements
CD -1 Erosion Control Details
CD -2 Miscellaneous Details
CD -3 Miscellaneous Details
CD -4 Utility Details
CD -5 Truck Scale Details
CD -6 Truck Scale Details
CD -7 Truck Scale Details
CD -8 Truck Scale Grading Plan
E-1 Electrical Symbols, Abbreviations and Notes
E-2 Electrical Site Plan (limited to relocated lighting, weight sign and bypass lane
traffic control arm)
ED -1 Electrical Details
S-1 Structural Notes
S-2 Foundation Plan
S-3 Sections and Details
102
Page 2 of 7
Subtask 2.1— 30 Percent Design
The Consultant will prepare 30 percent plans detailing the entry reconfiguration, interface
between the existing/proposed scales, traffic patterns and operational intentions,
utility/drainage/lighting impacts, and general scale configuration based on the information
provided by Mettler Toledo. The design will also consider the necessary, though
infrequent, need to weigh oversized loads, which the current scale is not configured to
accommodate. Two 11 x 17 hardcopy sets of review documents will be provided to the
County along with an electronic (PDF format) copy. A review meeting will be conducted
with SWDD staff to capture comments and concerns relative to the proposed 30 percent
design to ensure the design is compatible with SWDD's intended operation of the bypass
scale. Comments received will be documented and incorporated as appropriate for use in
preparing the 60 percent design documents.
Subtask 2.2 — 60 Percent Design
The Consultant will prepare 60 percent plans and specifications to serve as the bid package
for use by the County in soliciting competitive bids for construction of the project. The 60
percent design will incorporate comments received on the 30 percent design and will also
include detailed design of civil (paving, grading, drainage, signage), structural (foundation
review (by others), railings, subgrade stabilization), electrical, instrumentation (limited to
weight sign and conduit runs for automated terminal (equipment and integration by
others)), demolition, tree relocations and site restoration components. Environmental
services related to surface water impacts, gopher tortoise relocation, etc. are not included
in this scope of services. These services can be provided, if needed, under separate
authorization or amendment to this Work Order. Two full size sets of plans and two
hardcopy sets of draft specifications will be provided, along with an electronic copy (PDF
format) for the County's review.
A design review meeting will be conducted with SWDD staff to discuss comments on the
60 percent design documents. Comments received will be documented and incorporated as
appropriate for use in preparing the 90 percent design documents.
Subtask 2.3 — 90 Percent Design and Final Bid Package
The consultant will incorporate comments received during the 60 percent review and
advance the plans and specifications to the 90 percent completion level. Two full size sets
of plans and two hardcopy sets of draft specifications will be provided, along with an
electronic copy (PDF format) for the County's review. An additional review meeting will
be conducted with SWDD staff to discuss review comments and final modifications to be
made to the bid package. The consultant will incorporate final comments and coordinate
with procurement to prepare the final bid package for use in advertising the project. The
Consultant will provide a final PDF of the bid documents to SWDD and procurement for
use in soliciting bids.
Task 3: Permitting Services
It is anticipated that, due to the square footage of additional impervious surface
associated with these modifications, that a major site plan approval will be required from
103
Page 3 of 7
the County Planning Division. This task includes preparation of the required plan sets and
supporting documentation for the application for major site plan approval, participation in
the technical review committee (TRC) meeting, one round of revisions/resubmittal to
address any TRC comments, and coordination of final approval. Additional
revisions/iterations of the application will require an amendment for additional services.
The proposed project is not anticipated to require modification of the FDEP landfill
operations permit, stormwater/ERP permits or new County stormwater permit. The
selected contractor will be required to obtain County building permit(s). The Consultant
will assist with response to any design -related questions received in the building permit
process.
Task 4: Bidding Services
The Consultant will prepare for and participate in a pre-bid site visit meeting with
prospective bidders. An attendee list will be prepared, and questions asked will be
documented with written responses for procurement to distribute to plan holders. The
Consultant will prepare up to two addenda to the bid, providing clarifications and
additional information as needed. Consultant will coordinate with procurement on all bid -
related matters.
The Consultant will then review bids received, verify references and prepare a
recommendation of award to provide to SWDD. Upon award, the Consultant will
complete the preparation of conformed documents.
Task 5: Construction Phase Services (Not -to -Exceed)
The Consultant will review shop drawings submitted by the Contractor and scale provider
and will provide copies of all approved shop drawings to SWDD upon approval.
The Consultant will provide part-time observation of construction activities for the scope
of the project. Consultant will not supervise, direct, or control Contractor's work, and will
not have authority to stop the Work or responsibility for the means, methods, techniques,
equipment choice and use, schedules, or procedures of construction selected by
Contractor, for safety programs incident to Contractor's work, or for failure of Contractor
to comply with laws. Consultant does not guarantee Contractor's performance and has no
responsibility for Contractor's failure to perform in accordance with the Contract
Documents.
The Consultant anticipates that the construction phase will span a duration of 4 months.
During this time, the Consultant will provide an average of 4 hours per week of oversight
for a 16 -week duration, as well as 2 additional site visits by structural personnel, and will
prepare bi-weekly summary reports in the form of an email to the appropriate County
staff members. The Consultant will specifically be on site to observe any below -grade
piping/components prior to backfilling, observe the concrete pours, witness scale
104
Page 4 of 7
installation, observe testing and other key project milestones agreed upon with the
County.
The Consultant will also prepare for and participate in monthly progress meetings with
the contractor and SWDD staff (up to four). Meeting minutes will be prepared and
distributed as needed.
The County will contract directly with the contractor to perform the work. The
Consultant will review pay applications on behalf of the County and provide
recommendation for payment or justification for rejection. The Consultant will
participate in a substantial completion walkthrough at the appropriate point of
construction and generate a punch list, if applicable, to be addressed by the contractor.
The Consultant will then conduct a final walkthrough to observe that each punch list item
has been satisfactorily completed.
It is anticipated that all training on new instrumentation and operations and maintenance
manuals will be provided by the scale provider.
Task 6: Record Drawings
The Consultant will work with the contractor and surveyor (as -built survey to be in
contractor's scope of work) to prepare the final record drawings for County records and
for any required permit closeout activities.
105
Page 5 of 7
EXHIBIT B
FEESCHEDULE
The Consultant will provide these services in accordance with our Continuing Consulting
Engineering Services Agreement for Professional Services dated May 18, 2021, by and
between INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Florida
("COUNTY") and Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc., ("Consultant").
Kimley-Horn will perform Tasks 1 through 6 for the total lump sum fee as detailed
below. Individual task amounts are informational purposes only. All permitting,
application, and similar project fees will be paid directly by the County.
Task No.
Task
Task Fee
Task 1
Preliminary Design'
$ 10,850
Task 2
Design
$ 24,320
Task 3
Permitting
$ 7,540
Task 4
Bidding
$ 6,300
Task 5
Construction Phase Services
$ 21,720
Task 6
Record Drawings
$ 2,700
TOTAL LUMP SUM FEE
$ 73,430
Lump sum fees will be invoiced monthly based upon the overall percentage of services
completed. Payment will be due per the contract terms.
ADDITIONAL SERVICES
The following services are not included in the Scope of Services for this project but may
be required depending on circumstances that may arise during the execution of this
project. Additional services may include, but not be limited to the following:
• Environmental Services (surface water impacts, gopher tortoise relocation, etc.)
• Instrumentation design, integration, testing or training
• Irrigation system relocation design (County to complete) for piping affected by
the widening of the entry road
106
Page 6 of 7
EXHIBIT C
TIME SCHEDULE
Task 1 Deliverables:
Kickoff Meeting —1 week after Notice to Proceed (NTP)
Survey — 4 weeks after NTP
Geotechnical Report — 4 weeks after NTP
Task 2 Deliverables:
30 Percent Design — 6 weeks after NTP
60 Percent Design — 4 weeks from receipt of County Comments
90 Percent Design — 4 weeks from receipt of County Comments
Final Bid Documents — 2 weeks from receipt of County Comments
Task 3 Deliverables:
PERMITS TBD
Task 4 Deliverables:
Advertise — 16 weeks from NTP
Open Bids — 4 weeks from Advertisement
Award of Contract — 4 weeks from Bid Opening
Task 5 Duration:
Approximately 4 Months
Task 6 Deliverables
Record Drawings — 4 weeks from Completion of Construction
107
Page 7 of 7