HomeMy WebLinkAbout9/6/1995� MINUTE9WTTACHED
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
AGENDA
SEPTEMBER 6, 1995
5:01 P.M. - COUNTY COMMISSION CHAMBER
ADMINISTRATION BUILDING
1840 25th STREET
VERO BEACH, FLORIDA
Cg mtv Commissioners
Kenneth R. Macht, Chairman (District 3)
Fran B. Adams, Vice Chairman (District 1)
Carolyn K. Eggert (District 2)
Richard N. Bird, (District 5)
John W. Tippin, (District 4)
1. Call to Order
James E. Chandler, Administrator
Charles Vitunac, County Attorney
Jeffrey K. Barton, Clerk of Circuit Court
Joseph A. Baird, OMB Director
2. Pledge Of Allegiance - Fran B. Adams, Commissioner
3. Budget Overview by County Administrator, James Chandler
4. Adoption of Procedure to conduct Hearings on Ad Valorem Taxing Districts
Recommend adoption of following procedures for funds in agenda item 5:
A. Open Hearing
B. Announce Millage and percentage of increase in Millage over Rolled Back
Rate necessary to fund the Budget, if any, and Specific Purposes for which
Ad Valorem Tax Revenues are being increased
C. Receive comments from the Public
D. Consider any Proposed Amendments to Tentative Budget and Calculate
Revised Tentative Millage Rate (if revised)
E. Adopt Tentative Millage Rate
F. Adopt Tentative Budget
G. , Announce %, if any, by which Recomputed Tentative Millage Rate Exceeds
the Rolled Back Rate
1
5. AD VALOREM FUNDS
A. Ad Valorem Millage and Ad Valorem Budget (Read each fund separately
and make motion for each fund after Public input)
*Make a motion to approve millage rate and % Above or Below RollBack Millage (for each fund separately).
**Make a motion to approve Dollar amount (for each fund separately).
6. Solid Waste Disposal District Budget (Non -Ad Valorem Special District)
A. Announce 1995/96 Proposed Charge and Budget
1. $49.32 per Residential Waste Generation Unit
$35.64 per Commercial Waste Generation Unit
2. $7,635,073 Budget
B. Receive comments from the Public
C. Consider any Proposed Amendments
D. Adopt Budget Resolution
2
% Above or
Below
Dollar
Millage
Rollback
Motion
Amount
Motion
Millage
1. General Fund
4.2999
4.20%
Make a Motion*
$41,768.251
Make a Motion**
2. Municipal Service
Taxing Unit (M.S.T.U.)
1.6236
7.01%
Make a Motion*
$14,140,259
Make a Motion**
3. Transportation Fund
N/A
N/A
N/A
$9,376,511
Make a Motion**
4. Emergency Service
District
2.3129
11.35%
Make a Motion*
$12,609,613
Make a Motion**
5. Environmentally Sensitive
Land Acquisition Bond
.0369
N/A
Make a Motion*
$1,677,228
Make a Motion**
6. Aggregate
7.0816
6.43%
Make a Motion*
N/A
N/A
*Make a motion to approve millage rate and % Above or Below RollBack Millage (for each fund separately).
**Make a motion to approve Dollar amount (for each fund separately).
6. Solid Waste Disposal District Budget (Non -Ad Valorem Special District)
A. Announce 1995/96 Proposed Charge and Budget
1. $49.32 per Residential Waste Generation Unit
$35.64 per Commercial Waste Generation Unit
2. $7,635,073 Budget
B. Receive comments from the Public
C. Consider any Proposed Amendments
D. Adopt Budget Resolution
2
7. Adoption of Non -Ad Valorem Assessment Char
A. Announce 1995/96 proposed charge for each Non -Ad Valorem Assessment
District
B. Receive comments from the Public
C. Consider any Proposed Amendments and Calculate Revised Charge
D. Adopt Tentative Charge
3
Charge Per Parcel Acre
1.
Vero Lakes Estate M.S.T.U.
$15.00
Streetlighting Districts
2.
Gifford
$19.50
3.
Laurelwood
$18.00
4.
Rockridge
$15.00
5.
Vero Highlands
$20.00
6.
Porpoise Point
$30.00
7.
Laurel Court
$33.00
8
Tierra Linda
$42.00
9.
Vero Shores
$26.00
10.
Ixora Park
$23.00
11.
Royal Poinciana
$28.00
12.
Roseland Road
$6.00
13.
Whispering Pines
$25.50
14.
Moorings
$48.20
15.
Walker's Glen
$40.50
16.
Glendale Lakes
$34.00
17.
Floralton Beach
$32.50
B. Receive comments from the Public
C. Consider any Proposed Amendments and Calculate Revised Charge
D. Adopt Tentative Charge
3
8. Approve Non -Ad Valorem Dollar Budgets
A. Announce 1995/96 Proposed Budget (motion separate for each budget)
1.
Housing Authority
$952732
2.
Other Debt Service Fund
$1,384,983
3.
Capital Projects
$71,7441,114
4.
Other Special Revenue Funds
$142738,982
5.
Enterprise Funds
$2826492153
6.
Internal Service Funds
$2,262 ,1655
B. Receive comments from the Public
C. Consider any Proposed Amendments
D. Adopt Tentative Budget
9. Announce Time and Place of Final Budget Hearing
FINAL budget hearing will be held at 5:01 P.M. on Thursday, September 14, 1995, at
the County Administration Building, 1840 25th Street, Vero Beach, Florida.
10. ADJOURN
ANYONE WHO MAY WISH TO APPEAL ANY DECISION WHICH MAY BE MADE AT THIS MEETING WELL NEED TO
ENSURE THAT A VERBATIM RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS IS MADE WHICH INCLUDES THE TESTIMONY AND
EVIDENCE UPON WHICH THE APPEAL WILL BE BASED.
ANYONE WHO NEEDS A SPECIAL ACCOMMODATION FOR THIS MEETING MAY CONTACT THE COUNTY'S
AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT (ADA) COORDINATOR AT 567-8000, EXT. 408, AT LEAST 48 HOURS IN
ADVANCE OF MEETING.
4
September 6, 1995
SPECIAL MEETING
f
The Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County,
Florida, met in Special Session in County Commission Chambers, 1840
25th Street, Vero Beach, Florida, on Wednesday, September 6, 1995,
at 5:01 p.m. Present were Fran B. Adams, Vice Chairman; Richard N.
Bird; Carolyn K. Eggert; and John W. Tippin. Also present were
James E. Chandler, County Administrator; Charles P. Vitunac, County
.Attorney; and P. J. Jones, Deputy Clerk.
Chairman Kenneth R. Macht was absent from the meeting due to
the death of his wife, Irene.
Vice Chairman Adams called the meeting to order and led the
Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag.
PRELIlM[INARY BUDGET HEARING - EY 1995-1996
County Attorney Charles Vitunac announced that formal notice
of the meeting was given through the mailing of the Truth in
Millage (TRIM) Notice and the Notice of Non -Ad Valorem assessments
for 1995 to all Indian River County takpayers.
Vice Chairman Adams announced that this is the first of two
public hearings to consider the proposed budget for Fiscal Year
1995/96, and that County Administrator Jim Chandler would present
an overview of the proposed budget.
Administrator Chandler stated that after a brief overview of
the overall budget he would address each individual fund and he
recommended the Board follow the procedures outlined on the agenda
for the individual funds.
Vice Chairman Adams announced that it was the CONSENSUS of the
Board- to follow the procedures to conduct hearings on ad valorem
taxing districts as recommended by the County Administrator.
1
boof 95 mul
SEPTEMBER 6, 1995
BOOK 95 F,up
GENERAL FUND
Administrator' Chandler announced the proposed millage
reflected on TRIM notices is 4.2999 which is 4.20% above the
rollback millage of 4.1264. The proposed General Fund Budget is
$41,768,251 which is an increase of $1,991,776 over the current
budget of $39,776,475. Administrator Chandler stated that the
General Fund is funded through ad valorem taxes and the increase is
due to (1) additional personnel, (2) health insurance, (3) salary
reserves, (4) vehicle replacements, and (5) courthouse security.
Commissioner Eggert questioned whether the figures being
presented reflect the changes made at the March workshop, and
Administrator Chandler confirmed that they do.
The Vice Chairman opened the public hearing on the General
Fund and asked if anyone wished to be heard in this matter.
Ital Veron; Civic Association president, expressed his sadness
at Chairman Macht's recent loss. Mr. Veron was concerned about
costs and presented a chart comparing 6 counties, showing that
Indian River County has the highest level of spending while 3 of
the counties represented have greater populations.
Doyle Vernon of 2324 1st Place -SW felt that once the millage
is raised it is hard to lower it. He asked that each of the
County's section heads be taught fiscal prudence.
Barbara Tilton of 5725 N A1A questioned her property taxes and
Budget Director Baird explained that her increase was due to a
newly purchased property with a higher fair market value than her
previous property.
The Vice Chairman determined that no one else wished to be
heard and thereupon closed the public hearing.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by
Commissioner Bird, the Board unanimously, by a 4-0
vote (Chairman Macht being absent), approved the
tentative millage rate of 4.2999 for the General
Fund for Fiscal Year 1995/96.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by
Commissioner Bird, the Board unanimously, by a 4-0
vote (Chairman Macht being absent), approved the
tentative budget of $41,768,251 for the General Fund
for Fiscal Year 1993/96.
SEPTEMBER 6, 1995
MUNICIPAL SERVICE TAXING UNIT (Af.S.T.U.)
Administrator Chandler announced that the Municipal Service
Taxing Unit millage as reflected on TRIM notices is 1.6236 which is
7.01% above the rollback millage of 1.5173. The proposed M.S.T.U.
budget is $14,140,259 which is an increase of $1,139,847 over the
current budget of $13,000,412. Administrator Chandler advised that
almost 85% of the increase in this fund is confined to 2 areas; a
transfer to the General Fund for law enforcement and a transfer to
the Transportation Fund for the road and bridge department.
The Vice Chairman opened the public hearing on the M.S.T.U.
and asked if anyone wished to be heard in this matter. There being
none the Vice Chairman thereupon closed the public hearing.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by
Commissioner Bird, the Board unanimously, by a 4-0
vote (Chairman Macht being absent), approved the
tentative millage rate of 1.6236 for the Municipal
Service Taxing Unit for Fiscal Year 1995/96.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by
Commissioner Bird, the Board unanimously, by a 4-0
vote (Chairman Macht being absent), approved the
tentative budget of $14,140,259 for the Municipal
Service Taxing Unit for Fiscal Year 1995/96.
TRANSPORTATION FUND
Administrator Chandler announced that there is no millage for
the Transportation Fund and that the proposed budget is $9,376,511
which is an increase of $743,878 over the current budget of
$8,632,633. Administrator Chandler explained that 66% of the
Transportation Fund revenue is derived from the General Fund and
M.S.T.U. The areas comprising most of the 62% total increase are
materials cost, salary reserve and vehicle replacements. The
Transportation Fund includes the Public Works, Engineering,
Traffic, and Road and Bridge Departments. No additional positions
are proposed.
The Vice Chairman opened the public hearing on the
Transportation Fund and asked if anyone wished to be heard in this
matter.
3 Q Fao®
SEPTEMBER 6, 1995
BOOK 95 FSI IVU3:
Director Jim Davis stated that mandates to use paint which is
free of lead, 61' rather than 4" stripes and reflective markings,
together with enlarging approximately 30 culverts to accommodate
drainage have contributed to the increases in this fund.
The Vice Chairman determined that no one else wished to be
heard and thereupon closed the public hearing.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by
Commissioner Bird, the Board unanimously, by a 4-0
vote (Chairman Macht being absent), approved the
tentative budget of $9,376,511 for the
Transportation Fund for Fiscal Year 1995/96.
EMERGENCY SERVICE DISTRICT
Administrator Chandler announced that the Emergency Services
District millage reflected on TRIM notices is 2.3129 which is
11.35% above the rollback millage of 2.0772. The proposed
Emergency Services District budget is $12,609,613 which is an
increase of $766,652 over the current budget of $11,842,961.
Administrator Chandler advised that critical areas contained in
this budget are additional fire coverage in the north county for
quicker response time, and 6 additional paramedics (3 at Winter
Beach and 3 at Fellsmere) required because the volunteers cannot
continue beyond 1/1/96.
The Vice Chairman opened the public hearing on the Emergency
Services District and asked if anyone wished to be heard in this
matter.
Ital Veron, Civic Association president, expressed his
displeasure with the budget increases which he believed were out of
line with the number of calls for service. Mr. Veron read into the
record the following letter from the Civic Association dated
8/14/95:
4
SEPTEMBER 6, 1995
THE CIVIC ASSOCIATION Ver Box
IL
_ Vero Beachh,, FL
• of 32964-3381
Vero Beach and Indian River County
"Since 1968, preserving, fostering and promoting the beauty, natural resources and
good government of Vero Beach and Indian River County."
August 14, 1095
Dear Commissioner Macht:
The Civic Association has followed the County budget
cycle through the workshops and the proposed budget reduction
of $445,671, and we believe the new budget increase remains
excessive.
We are particularly concerned at the historic trend
of Emergency Serivices' annual growth in funding. In the
1991/92 budget year, Emergency Services was funded at a level
of $8.4 million and this year the department request was for
$13.3 million, a 58% increase in just five budget years.
To shed light on the need for such an exorbitant increase,
we met with the department director, Doug Wright, on July 18.
While he was most cordial, we felt that philosophically he
lacks the resolve to cut government spending and, therefore, large
future Emergency Services' budget increases may be expected.
Of particular concern to us is the enormous growth
in overtime, from $52,406 in 1991/92 to $758,433 in the proposed
95/96 budget -- a 13.5 fold or -1347% growth. Strangely, as we
add EMS staff we may expect a corresponding increase in .overtime,
which of course is contrary to any reasonable business principle.
The proposed staff increases caused by a new station in Fellsmere
and additions in Winter Beach will only compound this problem.
As a consequence, we recommend that the Commission defer these
increases until a complete review of the overtime circumstance
and/or Emergency Services' staff consolidation has been completed.
We are enclosing questions that we believe must be
answered prior to another major financial commitment to the
department of Emergency Services.
Si erely,
For the Board of Directors
Ital Veron, President
QUESTIONS CONCERNING GROWTH IN THE BUDGET FOR EMERGENCY SERVICES
CIVIC ASSOCIATION AUGUST 1995
1. What has caused a 589 growth in budget for Emergency Services
in just 5 years?
1995/96 department request. _ $13.3 million*
1991/92 actual = 8.4 million
5 year growth $4.9 million
*This was requested by the department; it is not what
they got after administrative staff reduction.
5 Roos 95 (��r10 0
SEPTEMBER 69 1995
Boca 95 Ptu(005
2. What percentage of EMS payroll is overtime? (Overtime
has grown from $52,406 in 1991/92 to $758,433 in the proposed
95/96 budget which is 13.5 fold or 1347% growth.)
3. Why hasn't the EMS department growth more closely trended
with population growth and calls for service?
The original plan was created on a projected population
growth of 3% per year and we've experienced approximately
half of that.
4. Why haven't we begun a cross -training program which would
more closely bring us into line with the economic reality
of the time and a program which is working in Indian River
Shores?
5. We believe an annual budget of $127,000 for uniforms and
clothing is excessive and we should find ways to reduce it.
6. How can we justify $7,000 for travel? Who goes where and
for what taxpayer benefit?
7. What criteria was used in proposing the Fellsmere station?
It's our understanding the volunteer program cost $67,000
for insurance and all operating costs and the proposed
program will cost over $700,000. Why can't there be s
reasonable compromise until the population density of the
area increases?
8. What criteria was used in expanding the staff in Winter
Beach? We won national recognition with current staff
which was obviously sufficient to serve the area.
9. Have we ever thought about privatizing some of the stations
as a test case which may serve as a yardstick on how cost-
effective our current system is?
10. When we buy equipment, why must we get all the "bells and
whistles" like a $3,500 copier (the second one in as many
years) and a $1500 lawn mower?
11. How will we bring future costs under control and what
management system will be utilized?
12. There are those who are critical of the 800 MHz communication
system. Why do we need it? How many other counties our size
have it? Are we falling prey to vendor scare tactics?
Aren't there other solutions'to serving the relatively few
dead areas?
6
SEPTEMBER 6, 1995
Administrator Chandler explained that the major change in this
budget was occasioned by compliance with the Fair Labor Standards
Act which has required a change in the way hours are computed for
ALS personnel in that any hours in excess of 40 hours must be
considered as overtime.
Mr. Veron questioned whether privatization of this department
has been considered, and Commissioner Eggert replied in the
affirmative.
Director Doug Wright explained that the Emergency Services
Department has grown enormously and that the citizens voted to move
toward paid and consolidated services through an orderly process.
At one time emergency calls were performed by volunteers which is
no longer an option. Director Wright elaborated that he had met
with Mr. Veron for several hours in an attempt to explain the
situation to him, including the $7,000 in travel expenses which
contains costs for tuition and registration as well.
Mr. Veron believed Director Wright to be an honorable and hard
working man of good purpose but believed that his department is not
showing fiscal restraint.
Commissioner Bird felt that the level of service far exceeds
anything available in the past, but that higher level of service
comes with a higher price.
Commissioner Eggert reminded the Board that the original 6
year plan has been stretched to a 9 year plan partly due to
acknowledgment of economic difficulties.
Vice Chairman Adams noted with regret the end of volunteer
emergency departments because of required advances in response
times and medical care.
The Vice Chairman determined that no one else wished to be
heard and thereupon closed the public hearing.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by
Commissioner Bird, the Board unanimously, by a 4-0
vote (Chairman Macht being absent), approved the
tentative millage rate of 2.3129 for the Emergency
Service District for Fiscal Year 1995/96.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by
Commissioner Bird, the Board unanimously, by a 4-0
vote (Chairman Macht being absent), approved the
tentative budget of $12,609,613 for the Emergency
Service District for Fiscal Year 1995/96.
7
SEPTEMBER 6, 1995
800� 9 5 Pg'tlo0
BOOK 95 Pu400 t!
ENVIRONMENTALLY SENSITIVE LAND ACQUISITION BOND
Administrator Chandler announced the Environmentally Sensitive
Land Acquisition Bond millage reflected on TRIM notices is .3069
and explained that the rollback does not apply as this is the first
year for this voted debt service. The proposed Environmentally
Sensitive Land Acquisition Bond Budget is $1,677,228.
The Vice Chairman opened the public hearing on the
Environmentally Sensitive Land Acquisition Bond and asked if anyone
wished to be heard in this matter.
Doyle Vernon hoped the congress will change the environmental
standards to incorporate more common sense.
The Vice Chairman determined that no one else wished to be
heard and thereupon closed the public hearing.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by
Commissioner Bird, the Board unanimously, by a 4-0
vote (Chairman Macht being absent), approved the
tentative millage rate of .3069 for the
Environmentally Sensitive Land Acquisition Bond for
Fiscal Year 1995/96.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by
Commissioner Bird, the Board unanimously, by a 4-0
vote (Chairman Macht being absent), approved the
tentative budget of $1,677,228 for' the
Environmentally Sensitive Land Acquisition Bond for
Fiscal Year 1995/96.
AGGREGATE
Administrator Chandler announced the proposed Aggregate
millage is 7.0816 which is 6.43% above the rollback millage of
6.6539. The total County budget is $142,082,064, an increase of
$8,923,401 over the current budget of $133,158,663.
The Vice Chairman opened the public hearing on the Aggregate
and asked if anyone wished to be heard in this matter. There
being none, the Vice Chairman thereupon closed the public hearing.
8
SEPTEMBER 6, 1995
ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by
Commissioner Bird, the Board unanimously, by a 4-0
vote (Chairman Macht being absent), approved the
tentative millage rate of 7.0816 for the Aggregate
for Fiscal Year 1995/96.
SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL DISTRICT BUDGET (NON -AD VALOREM
SPECIAL DISTRICT)
Administrator Chandler announced the proposed Solid Waste
Disposal District Waste Generation Unit residential charge is
$49.32 (or $78.92 per E.R.U.), with a commercial sector W.G.U. rate
of $35.64. The proposed budget is $7,635,073 which is an increase
of $153,849 over last year's budget of $7,481,224.
The Vice Chairman opened the public hearing on the Solid Waste
Disposal District and asked if anyone wished to be heard in this
matter. There being none, the Vice Chairman thereupon closed the
public hearing.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by
Commissioner Bird, the'Board unanimously, by a 4-0
vote (Chairman Macht being absent), approved the
tentative Residential Waste Generation Unit Charge
of $49.32 (or $78.92 per E.R.U.) for the Fiscal Year
1995/96.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by
Commissioner Bird, the Board unanimously, by a 4-0
vote (Chairman Macht being absent), approved the
tentative Commercial Waste Generation Unit Charge of
$35.64 for the Fiscal Year 1995/96.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by
Commissioner Bird, the Board unanimously, by a 4-0
vote (Chairman Macht being absent), approved the
tentative budget of $7,635,073 for the Solid Waste
Disposal District for Fiscal Year 1995/96.
NON -AD VALOREM ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS
Administrator Chandler announced the proposed charge for each
Non -Ad Valorem assessment as follows:
9
SEP'T'EMBER 6, 1995 nox 95 ;F*gJ00
BOOK 9000
The Vice Chairman opened the public hearing on the Non -Ad
Valorem Assessment Districts and asked if anyone wished to be heard
in this matter. There being none, the Vice Chairman thereupon
closed the public hearing.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by
Commissioner Bird, the Board unanimously, by a 4-0
vote (Chairman Macht being absent), approved the
tentative charges per parcel acre as noted for each
Non -Ad Valorem Assessment District for Fiscal Year
1995/96.
10
SEPTEMBER 6, 1995
Charge Per Parcel Acre
1.
Vero Lakes Estate M.S.T.U.
$15.00
Streethghting Districts
2.
Gifford
$19.50
3.
Laurelwood
$18.00
4.
Rockridge
$15.00
5.
Vero Highlands
$20.00
6.
Porpoise Point
$30.00
7.
Laurel Court
$33.00
8
Tierra Linda
$42.00
9.
Vero Shores
$26.00
10.
Ixora Park
$23.00
11.
Royal Poinciana
$28.00
12.
Roseland Road
$6.00
13.
Whispering Pines
$25.50
14.
Moorings
$48.20
15.
Walker's Glen
$40.50
16.
Glendale Lakes
$34.00
17.
Floralton Beach
$32.50
The Vice Chairman opened the public hearing on the Non -Ad
Valorem Assessment Districts and asked if anyone wished to be heard
in this matter. There being none, the Vice Chairman thereupon
closed the public hearing.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by
Commissioner Bird, the Board unanimously, by a 4-0
vote (Chairman Macht being absent), approved the
tentative charges per parcel acre as noted for each
Non -Ad Valorem Assessment District for Fiscal Year
1995/96.
10
SEPTEMBER 6, 1995
NON -AD- VALOREM DOLLAR BUDGETS -
Administrator Chandler announced the proposed dollar budgets
for each Non -Ad Valorem Dollar Fund:
1.
Housing Authority
$959732
2.
Other Debt Service Fund
$1,3841,983
3.
Capital Projects
$727442114
4.
Other Special Revenue Funds
$14,7382982
5. ,
Enterprise Funds
$285,6491,153
16.
Internal Service Funds
$29262,165
The Vice Chairman opened the public hearing and asked if
_ anyone wished to be heard in this matter. There being none, the
Vice Chairman thereupon closed the public hearing.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by
Commissioner Tippin, the Board unanimously, by a 4-0
vote (Chairman Macht being absent), approved the
tentative budget of $95,732 for Housing Authority
for Fiscal Year 1995/96.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by
Commissioner Tippin, the Board unanimously, by a 4-0
vote (Chairman Macht being absent), approved the
tentative budget of $1,384,983 for Other Debt
Service Fund for Fiscal Year 1995/96.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by
Commissioner Tippin, the Board unanimously, by a 4-0
vote (Chairman Macht being absent), approved the
tentative budget of $7,744,114 for Capital Projects
for Fiscal Year 1995/96.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by
Commissioner Tippin, the Board unanimously, by a 4-0
vote (Chairman Macht being absent), approved the
tentative budget of $14,738,982 for Other Special
Revenue Funds for Fiscal Year 1995/96.
11
SEPTEMBER 6, 1995
60OK
Boa 95, fqoli
ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by
Commissioner Tippin, the Board unanimously, by a 4-0
vote (Chairman Macht being absent), approved the
tentative budget of $28,649,153 for Enterprise Funds
for Fiscal Year 1995/96.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by
Commissioner Tippin, the Board unanimously, by a 4-0
vote (Chairman Macht being absent), approved the
tentative budget of $2,262,165 for Internal Service
Funds for Fiscal Year 1995/96.
Vice Chairman Adams announced the Final Budget Hearing would
be held at 5:01 p.m. on Thursday, September 14, 1995.
Vice Chairman Adams commended the Property Appraiser and.the
Tax Collector and their staff for their efforts in informing the
public of how taxes are distributed among the various taxing
districts.
There being no further business, on Motion duly made, seconded
and carried, the Board adjourned at 6:47 p.m.
ATTEST:
J. rton, Clerk Fran B. Adams, Vice Chairman
Minutes Approved: �-O? �-/ S-
12
SEPTEMBER 6, 1995