Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1989-0828/14/89(SPB02)LEGAL(WGC/sb) RESOLUTION NO. 89-_8.2-- A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, APPROVING THE EVALUATION AND APPRAISAL REPORT OF THE 1982 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN . WHEREAS, pursuant to the provision In Chapter 163, Section 163.3191, Florida Statutes, the Local Planning Agency has prepared a report evaluating and appraising the 1982 Indian River County Comprehensive Plan, and WHEREAS, the Local Plan Agency has recommended sending said evaluation and appraisal of 1982 Comprehensive Plan to the governing body for transmittal to the State Planning Agency, and WHEREAS, the Local Planning Agency held on August 10, 1989, a public hearing duly advertised, on the evaluation and appraisal report at which time they assessed and evaluated the successes and failures of the 1982 Comprehensive Plan and suggested that changes needed to address deflencies In the Comprehensive Plan were addressed In the recommended Comprehensive Plan in compliance with the requirements of F.S. 163.3177, and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners has received the evaluation and appraisal report from the Local Planning Agency and has proposed amending Its Comprehensive Plan based on the recommendations contained in the evaluation report, and the new requirements of Chapter 163, Florida Statutes, Part II, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA that: 1. The above recitals are affirmed In their entirety. 2. The Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County hereby adopts the evaluation and appraisal report forwarded by the Local Planning Agency and directs the transmission of ten (10) copies of said report to State f PURPOSE AND INTENT Florida Statute, Chapter 163 mandates that all local governments shall have in place a comprehensive plan. In addition, the statute requires the local planning agency to "monitor and oversee the effectiveness and status of the comprehensive plan and recommend to the governing body such changes in the comprehensive plan as may from time to time be required," (FS 163.3174(5)). Finally, the statute requires that "the local planning agency shall prepare periodic reports on the comprehensive plan, which shall be sent to the governing body at least once every five years," (FS 163.3191(1)). It is the intent of Indian River County to comply with mandated requirements in preparing the Evaluation and Appraisal Report (EAR) for the 1982 Indian River County Comprehensive Plan. This report shall assess the successes and failures of the 1982 Comprehensive Plan as a whole, as well as the ability of each individual element to serve as a policy document upon which decisions affecting the county are based. Any changes made to the 1982 Comprehensive Plan shall be addressed either in this report or written within the Comprehensive Plan Update, which will be submitted to the state for review in September, 1989. Since the 1982 Plan was created under different C requirements than those currently mandated by Chapter 163 and 9J-5, FAC, many of the objectives of the plan are unmeasurable. For these reasons, the results of the EAR for the 1982 Plan will be a summarization of the successes and failures of each element, based upon evaluation of the degree of achievement of the elements' objectives. An evaluation matrix will supplement the general evaluation. LAND USE ELEMENT There are two objectives identified in the 1982 Indian River County Comprehensive Plan Land Use Element: 1. Urban development shall be encouraged to fill in available land closest to service areas of the county so as to avoid "spot development". Lower density and intensity shall take place in areas that are environmentally sensitive and in areas outside the urban service perimeter. 2. Incompatible land uses should be separated from one another. Where they do abut, appropriate physical or natural buffers will be established. Assessment All urban development, with the exception of that occurring in the I-95/SR 60 Node, has occurred east of I-95 and in proximity to urban services. The 1985 comprehensive rezoning of all the land in the county has en;cnred compatibility of recent development with the Land Use Plan. At least one hundred amendments to the Land Use Plan have been submitted since the 1982 Plan. Of those adopted, most amendments served to expand development areas within the county. Adopted amendments to the Land Use Plan have consistently maintained the integrity of the plan. Present land use regulations, the revision of the Zoning Code in 1984, and market influences have combined to keep most development in the vicinity of Vero Beach and Sebastian. The most intensive development has occurred where water and sewer are available, areas such as SR 60, US 1 adjacent to city limits and portions of the north island. A lack of services and facilities has resulted in development at lower densities in outlying areas. There are, however, some unintended disincentives for infill development caused by higher impact fees in the more developed areas. Areas designated as environmentally sensitive in the 1982 Plan have been protected from significant development. The Transfer of Development Rights (TDR) provisions in the Indian River County Code of Laws and Ordinances for Planned Residential Developments (PRD's) has helped to maintain many of the wetland areas along the Indian River. The Grove Isle PRD is one example of a TDR within Indian River County. Conservation easements, such as the one used for Orchid Isle Estates, have also been successful in preserving environmental areas as called for in the 1982 Land Use Element. As revised in 1984, the county's zoning regulations include specific buffer requirements by land use type. New development is required to have buffering when adjacent to dissimilar uses. These SANITARY SEWER ELEMENT There are three objectives identified in the Sanitary Sewer Element of the 1982 Comprehensive Plan: 1. Reduce costs of wastewater treatment operations by establishing private owned and county owned subre- gional treatment facilities. 2. Septic tanks may be used whenever feasible. 3. Effect the sanitary sewering of all unincorporated areas consistent with the growth management policies of the Land Use Element. Assessment The County has been successful in providing wastewater service to its residents through a combination of public and private facilities. Since the 1982 Plan, Indian River County has established 2 county -owned wastewater treatment facilities and is negotiating with General Development Utilities (GDU) to purchase its facility for the southern portion of the county. Additionally, the county has taken over several smaller facilities that privately could not maintain minimum operational standards. Finally, the county is making plans for future construction of a wastewater treatment facility in the Northern portion of the county. The county currently serves 29,900 customers, maintains 834,240 linear feet of gravity sewer line, has constructed 419,760 linear feet of force main, and manages 55 lift stations. Indian River County, through coordination by the Department of Environmental Health, issues permits for septic tanks whenever state and local requirements have been met. In recent years, an average of 1000-1200 permits for septic tanks had been issued annually. Through the expansion of wastewater collection and treatment facilities, many of the areas previously using septic tanks have been connected to the County systems. It has been projected that, by 1995, 408 of existing residential units and 60% of existing non-residential establishments will be connected to the county systems. As a result, the number of permits for septic tanks will be significantly lower in the future. The county provides wastewater treatment facilities with revenue derived through impact fees, developer dedications, assessments and other appropriate sources. As a result, in most cases the county has been able to maintain its services consistent with the growth management policies of the Land Use Element. The specific service areas served by the public facilities include: * the southern portion of the Barrier Island, served by the City of Vero Beach; * the Vero Beach Highlands area served by the GDU Plant; 4 POTABLE WATER ELEMENT The Potable Water Element for the 1982 Comprehensive Plan has three objectives: 1. Conserve and protect all sources of water resources from pollution and over utilization. 2. Provide those users within the Urban Service areas with an economical water service. 3. The county shall establish innovative means for extension of safe and efficient potable water service. - Assessment Indian River County has established the south county Reverse Osmosis (RO) Water Treatment Plant, to provide potable water to county residents. Prior to 1982, the amount of water conservation in the county was hard to determine, since the county contained many private wells and private water systems. With the provision of public water service to many areas, the county now maintains better control of and provides for the conservation of water resources. The county currently serves 5,197 units and approximately 13,000 customers with potable water. By providing potable water to many areas, the county has reduced the number of private wells using the shallow aquifer. With its RO system, the county provides water from a more reliable source (Floridan aquifer) , ensuring adequate quantity and quality of water in the future. The county has also adopted a landscape ordinance which provides for the use Of less irrigation water. The 1990 Plan will provide for further control of the conservation and protection of the water resources. Economical water service in the county is maintained in several ways. With its new RO plant, the county has not only provided safe and adequate service; it has also provided for protection of shallow aquifer water by using the Floridan aquifer as its water source. The county has also strengthened the water system with its purchase and reparation of small private plants. in addition, Indian River County has proposed and designed a regional water plant for the northern portion of the county. When this system is in place, a substantial number of small water systems will be eliminated, and their customers will receive economical service from the county. The county extends its water services and facilities through the Use of impact fees, developer dedications, assessments and other appropriate sources. The county Utilities Department is established as an enterprise system which allows the county to maintain and expand its potable water system where economically feasible to accommodate future expansion of the urban service area. 6 N DRAINAGE ELEMENT The Drainage Element of the 1982 Comprehensive Plan has the following objectives: 1. Insure that all areas of the county where development is existing or 'proposed have sufficient drainage capabilities. 2. Enhance water quality values through use of drainage practices which will eliminate pollutant loadings from receiving waters. 3. Coordinate with the St. John's River Water Management District, the municipalities, and the drainage districts in solving drainage problems on a county -wide basis. 4. The county will support development of a comprehensive area -wide surface management program. 5. The county will encourage development of drainage facilities in unincorporated areas meeting priority needs. - Assessment Indian River County, along with six local water control districts which are independent taxing authorities, and the St, John's River Water Management District, collectively control drainage in the developed and developing areas of the county. In addition to drainage control, these governing units address stormwater quality through development requirements such as storage requirements, outfall limitations, and impervious surface controls. This process enhances water quality and reduces pollutants in receiving waters. Indian River county has additionally adopted a stormwater management ordinance since the 1982 plan. As a result of its collective controls, the county, the St. John's River Water Management District, the municipalities and the drainage districts have prevented county -wide drainage problems from occurring in proposed and existing development. The county has also supported the development of a comprehensive area -wide surface water management program. Although a program has not yet been established, many proposals have been developed, and the 1990 Plan will pursue a more definite surface water management program. 7 a 4 SOLID WASTE ELEMENT N_ The Solid Waste Element for the 1982 Comprehensive Plan contains two objectives: I The county will continue to serve as the responsible local government for developing and operating solid waste disposal facilities. 2. The county will study possible resource recovery methods and will undertake approaches which prove to be economically feasible. - Assessment The establishment of a Solid Waste Disposal District has enhanced the development and operation of solid waste disposal facilities. By creating this district, the county has established a solid waste enterprise system which derives revenues from assessment fees based upon land use classifications. This district includes both the municipalities and the unincorporated areas of the county. It also provides the county with an equitable and auequate funding mechanism for solid waste activities. The county closed Segment 41 of the landfill by mid-July, 1989, and opened Segment #2 to accept solid waste at that time. Segment #2 has a fill capacity of 1.4 million cubic yards and will maintain its active state until mid-July, 1994. The landfill has a lifespan of over twenty years. The county has completed its study of possible resource recovery methods as part of the Solid Waste Master Plan. As of yet, no resource recovery center has been established. With the creation of the Solid Waste Recycling Program in July, 1989, the county plans to reduce the volume of its waste by 30%, by July 1994. N 8 TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT There are several objectives identified in to the 1982 Transportation Element: 1. Develop an effective traffic circulation system which meets the existing and anticipated needs of county residents. 2. Provide adequate safety standards in the design of new and improved roadways. 3. insure the future roadway network is financially feasible. 4. Coordinate the traffic circulation system with other transportation modes such as bus, taxi, bikeways and rail. 5. Provide for adequate flexibility in the design of new street construction or improvements. 6. Coordinate development intensity with the carrying capacity of the existing roadway. 7. Roadways will be constructed to minimize adverse impacts on environmentally sensitive areas, as specified in the Conservation and Coastal Zone Management Element, 8. Develop a transportation network which is in harmony with the existing landscapes and natural amenities. 9. Promote and encourage citizen input into decisions affecting the traffic circulation system. 10. All roadway improvements should be coordinated with appropriate local, regional and state agencies. Assessment In an effort to develop an effective traffic circulation system, Indian River County in 1985 adopted the Major Street and Highway Program. In addition, a Traffic Circulation Plan and a 20 Year Transportation Capital Improvement Program (TCIP) were adopted to help meet the existing and anticipated needs of county residents. Since the 1982 Plan, the county has constructed Indian River Boulevard and Lindsey Road. Financially, the county has adopted 5 Year and 20 Year Transportation Capital Improvements Programs (TCIP) . The county has adopted traffic impact fees, a six cent local option gas tax, and a one cent local option sales tax. These programs will help ensure that the future roadway network is financially feasible. M The county received a grant from the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) for the purpose of developing the transportation planning capability necessary for the county's transition into urban county status with the establishment of an Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) for transportation planning. The county has used the funds to hire a consultant to prepare the Traffic Circulation Element of the 1990 Comprehensive Plan. Development impacts on roadways are reviewed through the Traffic Impact Analyses mandated by the site plan ordinance. In additiont there is a review of roadways prior to the approval of higher zoning densities. These processes have been successful in maintaining service levels on the county's roadways. In addition to the traffic impact analysis, the county requires that an Environmental Impact Analysis be prepared where roadway construction occurs in environmentally sensitive areas. This minimizes adverse impacts that may occur due to roadway construction. With regard to the flexibility in design of new street construction and improv:ments, the county has followed the adopted state design and construction guidelines. These have been the basis of all county roadway construction, including the recently built Indian River Boulevard and Lindsey Road, marginal access easements have been acquired, intersections have been signalized and roads have been widened when necessary. The county currently owns 221.36 miles of paved road and 414.78 miles of unpaved road. The county has recognized the importance of the relationship between the transportation network and the existing landscape and natural amenities. In order to meet this aesthetic objective, the county adopted a Traffic Circulation Study and Thoroughfare Plan in 1985. The policies regarding aesthetics have been followed, and the county has included comparable policies in the 1990 Plan. In an effort to provide necessary information regarding roadway improvements, the county must continually coordinate with appropriate local, regional and state agencies. Indian River County coordinates roadway improvements with local officials through the Transportation Planning Committee and the Federal Department of Transportation (FDOT). Citizen participation is an important element in the development of a good transportation network. Residents of Indian River County have been able to provide public input through the Transportation Planning Committee, as well as through the county Planning and Zoning Commission. Efforts in these areas have enhanced the decision-making process for traffic circulation matters. M • • •f CONSERVATION AND COASTAL ZONE MANAGEMENT ELEMENT. The objectives for the Conservation and Coastal Zone Management Element of the 1982 Comprehensive Plan include: 1. Maintain air quality at safe levels. 2. Protect; groundwater systems from development impacts and implement water use practices that insure the continued supply of potable water for urban uses. 3. Maintain and improve the water quality in the county's rivers, lakes and wetland systems. 4. Preserve the native fauna and flora. 5. Develop a coordinated program to recognize and preserve scenic routes and historic sites. 6. Protect the social, economic and environmental attributes of the Coastal system. ` Assessment Safe air quality levels in Indian River County have been maintained through the review of potential stationary air pollutant sources at the time of development proposals in coordination with the Department of Health and Rehabilitation Services and the Public Health unit. Presently, there is a sufficient supply of potable water for urban use. Expansion of public water service has occurred with establishment of the regional RO Plan which uses the Floridan aquifer as its source of water. The stormwater management ordinance further controls usage and treatment of potable water through stormwater retention and detention requirements. This results in filtration of the first inch of stormwater, thereby enhancing shallow aquifer quality and quantity. The revision of the excavation and mining ordinance to protect the coastal sandridge up to the 25' foot contour was effected by the county in 1988 and constitutes another means of protecting potable water supplies. Many steps have been taken since the 1982 plan to maintain and improve the water quality in the county's rivers, lakes and wetland systems. Indian River County has coordinated with jurisdictional agencies for development reviews. The county site plan ordinance has helped in wetland protection through the transfer of development rights. The county has established littoral zone and water quality standards for created waterbodies. The 1990 plan will expand upon required standards of water quality and will include measures to improve and protect such areas as the Sebastian River, Indian River Lagoon and various isolated wetlands. 12 40 There has been further improvement in the preservation of development sites, largely due to the implementation of the County Tree Protection Ordinance, which includes mangrove protection. The need to acquire land for environmentally critical areas has lead to the organization of "Save Our Shores", which privately works toward the land acquisition of coastal strands. The protection of historic roads has been completed with the adoption of the Scenic and Historic Roads Ordinance, further protection has been ensured with the adoption of the Jungle Trail Management Plan. In addition, a Historic Buildings survey has been completed for the unincorporated area of Indian River County. Additional specific protective ordinances are needed, and the 1990 Plan will include more specific programs to preserve and protect the scenic and historic sites in Indian River County. Several steps have been taken since the 1982 plan to protect the social, economic and environmental attributes of the coastal system. Incentives to developers to transfer development rights have increased the protection of estuarine wetlands. Regulations for dock construction have minimized the impact on shoreline vegetation and se-�grasses. Indian River County has established a dune stabilization setback line to help protect the dune system. The county has also adopted a Sea Turtle Protection ordinance and regulations for the protection of mangroves. These efforts, along with improved and coordinated intergovernmental efforts, have provided protection for the Indian River Lagoon and the county's coastal system. 13 RECREATION AND OPEN SPACE ELEMENT There are five objectives to the Recreation and Open Space Element of the 1982 Plan: 1. To provide a wide range of recreational opportunities which meet the current and future demands of all segments of the community. 2. To use natural resources to full advantage in meeting recreation and open space needs. 3. To preserve the unique and irreplaceable natural resources. 4. To coordinate with state, regional and municipal levels of government in providing recreational opportunities. S. To integrate recreational space and facilities into all urban residential areas. ` Assessment Indian River County has taken several steps to provide a wide range of recreational opportunities. Through a $5 million bond issue, the county has purchased beachfront land for parks. In addition, funds have been committed for the purchase of a South County Park. The county has also provided funds to the City of Sebastian for recreation facilities and has contributed to the City of Vero Beach's recreation programs. Other programs include the construction of a golfcourse in the Hobart area and county improvements made at the fairgrounds site. These programs have provided increased recreational opportunities for county residents. Policies to be incorporated in the 1990 plan will provide for future recreational needs throughout Indian River County. The acquisition of beachfront land is one of the means Indian River County has used to provide areas for recreation and open space. The expansion of the boat ramp on the Wabasso Causeway by the county has accommodated increased recreational needs.: Other recreation improvements are being included in the 1990 plan to provide for future recreation and open space needs. The preservation of unique and irreplaceable natural resources has been addressed as well. A proposal has been made to purchase the McKee Jungle Gardens, and plans have been made to regulate and maintain Jungle Trail. These projects have been supplemented by the revision of zoning regulations for the county in 1985. These and the regulations in the 1990 Plan will help solidify the preservation of the county's unique and irreplaceable natural resources. The county has coordinated with many governmental factions in reference to the provision of recreational facilities. Indian 14 a -A HOUSING ELEMENT The objective for the 1982 Housing Element is that: 1. Indian River County will encourage the development of a safe and convenient housing supply which is accessible to public services and facilities. The county will encourage the private sector to offer housing with a wide range of housing costs in order to satisfy the needs of all income levels within the community. " Assessment Monetary support for the provision of housing has been provided by the county to the housing Authority. The county, however, has not been directly involved in the home building/providing process. Through its land development regulations, the county permits a broad range of housing types, including single family, multiple family and mobile homes with various densities from less than one unit per acre to fourteen units per acre. The highest densities are most likely to have lower cost housing. Presently, there is no special consideration for lower cost housing with regard to permits, codes, improvements and impact fees. In addition, there is little direct action on the part of the county government to develop housing. However, Indian River County's lowest income area, Gifford, has made use of grant funds for sewer and water service. The county is examining future initiatives to improve the housing supply in Indian River County. Several recent developments, funded by a variety of federal and state funding programs, have provided additional housing units for lower income persons. One development is Treasure Coast Village. This is a 71 lot single-family subdivision developed by the Housing Authority. A broad range of financing methods were used. Victory Park, a farm labor housing project, has 50 units in Phase I and 50 units under construction in Phase II. The project was funded through the Farmers Home Administration. The Housing Authority has provided direct funding assistance or managed funding for home rehabilitation of 100 units through grants and low cost loans. The housing Authority has provided housing assistance to over 400 families per year. 16 UTILITY (ELECTRICAL POWER) ELEMENT There are two objectives to the Utility (Electrical Power) Element of the 1982 Comprehensive Plan; 1. State the inter -relationship between power generating facilities and transmission lines; 2. Recognize the need for electrical power to serve existing facilities and projected growth. . Assessment It was a requirement of the 1975 Local Government Comprehensive Planning Act that all local governments complete a Utility Element as part of their comprehensive plan. Indian River County has coordinated with FPL and with the Vero Beach Municipal Electric Company. In so doing the county has reviewed each utility's 10 -year utility facilities plan. This coordination has helped to avoid conflict with local plans and development patte,:ns throughout the county. The county has encouraged practical use of underground utilities, as well as the collective use of utility corridors and easements. Indian River County has developed land use regulations which encourage the location of electrical facilities, transmission stations, substations and T.V. towers so that a minimum land use and aesthetic conflict occurs. The county is presently amending its tower regulations to further avoid such conflicts. Through zoning and land use regulations, the county has required appropriate buffering and landscaping in an effort to minimize aesthetic conflict. in addition, the county enforces the Energy Efficiency Codes through the Building Department. The county has been and will continue to support and cooperate with federal, state and local government research for present and future energy needs. Indian River County will continue to coordinate with FPL to ensure that sufficient electrical power is maintained in the county. 17 INTERGOVERNMENTAL COORDINATION C The Intergovernmental Coordination Element for the 1982 Comprehensive Plan contains four objectives: 1. The county must keep the adjacent counties, municipalities, and other taxing districts continuously informed as to the development and implementation of the Comprehensive Plan. 2. All request for annexation in the unincorporated areas of the county shall be administered in accordance with Chapter 171 Florida Statutes. 3. Indian River County will continue to coordinate with the County School Board and other local governments which provide services to the unincorporated areas of the county. 4. Indian River County will continue to coordinate with all Regional, State and Federal agencies. A. Coordination with Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council shall be a priority in coordinating the implementation of the Comprehensive Plan and major development projects. B. Revisions, requirements or requests regarding the Comprehensive Plan shall be submitted to the Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council and the State of Florida, Department of Community Affairs. C. Particular attention will be given to coordination of any and all information with respect to the Indian River County Solid Waste Programa The County Health Department shall be kept well informed. Assessment Indian River County has participated with regional and local entities for the coordination of regional and local matters, primarily through various review processes. The county has also maintained contact with state, regional and local governments with regard to the development and implementation of the Comprehensive Plan. This includes the creation of the Comprehensive Plan Technical Advisory Committee for 1990 comprehensive plan development. Indian River has coordinated with the municipalities within the county regarding annexation in the unincorporated areas of the county. Those_ annexations that have occurred since adoption of the 1982 Plan have followed the regulations specified in the State Statute. 18 Indian River County has both formally and informally coordinated with the County School Hoard and other local governments which provide services to the unincorporated areas of the county. There are several specific areas in which Indian River County has successfully coordinated with local governments. Examples include the establishment of a county -wide traffic impact fee system and the creation of a county/city building department. The county has also participated with the cities of Vero Beach and Sebastian in joint recreation programs. Representatives from both Indian River County and its municipalities have established several joint committees, including the Transportation Planning Committee, the Economic Development Council, and the Parks and Recreation Committee. There has also been joint county/city meetings between Indian River County and the cities of Vero Beach and Sebastian. The 1990 Plan will include provisions for more formal coordination mechanisms between Indian River County and other governmental entities. Indian River County has consistently coordinated with the Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council as well as state and federal agencies. Coordination has taken place primarily through the project and plan review processes. Indian River County has also coordinated with the Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council in the implementation of the 1982 Comprehensive Plan. Any revisions, requirements or requests regarding the Comprehensive Plan have been submitted to the necessary governmental bodies. In addition, Indian River County has continued coordination with the Health Department regarding the County's septic tank and well permitting programs. The 1990 Plan will ensure that effective coordination with other governmental bodies continues. 19 EVALUATION MATRIX STATUS KEY . C - MIPLETE PC - PARTIALLY COMPLETE N - NO ACTION U - UM11EASURABLE OBJECTIVES _-K. LAND USE STATUS ACTIONS TAKEN 1. Urban development shall be encouraged PC/U - land use, zoning, market to fill in available land closest to influences kept market close service areas of- the county so as to to municipalities avoid "spot development". Lower density and intensity shall take - lack of services kept out - lying areas at lower densi- place in areas that are environ- ties mentally sensitive and in areas - planning to build plant outside the urban service perimeter. in north county 2. Septic tanks may be used whenever C - environmentally sensitive feasible. designation, TDR's for PRO's 3. Effect the sanitary sewering of all C maintained river wetlands 2. Incompatible land uses should be PC/U - enacted regulations requiring new developments to provide separated from one another. where buffering they do abut, appropriate physical - sanitary sewer capacity has or natural buffers will be established. increased by 2.65 mgd (null - OBJECTIVES - B. SANITARY SEWER STATUS ACTIONS TAKEN 1. Reduce costs of wastewater treatment PC - established county owned operations by establishing privately facilities owned and county owned subregional —negotiating w/tDU to buy treatment facilities. plant for south area - planning to build plant in north county 2. Septic tanks may be used whenever C - permits given when state and feasible. local requirements are met 3. Effect the sanitary sewering of all C - facilities extended through unincorporated areas consistent with impact fees, developer dedi- the growth management policies of the cation, assessments Land Use Element. - sanitary sewer capacity has increased by 2.65 mgd (null - ion gallons per day) 20 C 0WWrIVES - C. POTABLE WATER STATUS ACTIONS TAKEN 1. Conserve and protect all sources of PC - reverse osmosis (RO) Plant water resources from pollution and established overutilization - landscape ordinance adopted proposed have sufficient drainage - coordination with the Dept. capability. of Environmental Health 2. Enhance water quality values through PC and SJIWM 2. Provide those users within the urban C - reverse osmosis (RD) Plant service area with an economical water established service. - proposal and design of north county regional water plant 3. The county shall establish innovative C - extension of county system means for extension of safe and effici- capacity by 3.03 mgd ent potable water service. million gallons per day) OBJECTIVES - D. DRAINAGE STATUS AZIONS TAKEN 1. Insure that all areas of the county C - adopted stormwater management where development is existing or ordinance proposed have sufficient drainage capability. 2. Enhance water quality values through PC - stormwater treatment detent- use of drainage practices which will ion ponds requiredby devel- eliminate pollutant loadings from oper receiving waters. - installed storm sewer culvert at 12th and 16th Streets east of 20th Ave 3. Coordinate with the St. Johns River C water management district, the munic- ipalities, and the drainage districts in solving drainage problems on a county -wide basis. 4. The county will support development of U a comprehensive area -wide surface man- agement program. 5. The county will encourage development of PC drainage facilities in unincorporated areas meeting priority needs. 21 - coordination is maintained - proposals have been developed - nothing tangible established - facilities developed and maintained as needed - Lateral H is 00% complete El OBJECTIVES - E. SOLID ;4ASTE STATUS AC21ONS TAKEN 1. The county will continue to serve as C - solid waste disposal district the responsible local government for established developing and operating solid waste - new segment of landfill disposal facilities. developed 2. The county will study possible re- C - completed as part of solid source recovery methods and will waste master plan undertake approaches which prove to - solid waste recycling program be economically feasible, established by July 1, 1989 to reduce volume OBJECTIVES - F. TRANSPORTATION STATUS ACTIONS TAKEN 1. Develop an effective traffic circu- C lation system which meets existing and anticipated needs of ^ounty residents. 2. Provide adequate safety standards in C the design of new and improved roadways. 3. Ensure the future roadway network is C financially feasible. 4. Coordinate the traffic circulation sys- PC tem with other transportation modes such as bus, taxi, bikeways and rail. 5. Provide for adequate flexibility in the PC design of new street construction or or improvements. 22 - adopted 1985 Major Street and Highway Program - prepared traffic circulation study - adopted 20 Year Transport- ation Capital Improvements Program (TCIP) - Construction of Indian River Blvd and Lindsey Read - adopted state safety guidelines - adopted 5 year and 20 year Transportation Capital Improvements Programs (TCIP) - adopted calprehensive bikeway and sidewalkplan - follow adopted state design and construction guidelines for R -O -W protection - The county has acquired over 67.32 square acres (based upon thoroughfare plan and does not include internal subdivision roads) of RC1 since 1982 Uf3Jt;:UVES - F. TRANSPORTATION STATUS ACTIONS TAI= 6. Coordinate development intensity with C - traffic impact analysis the carrying of the existing roadway. requirement adopted in site plan ordinance - review of roadways prior to 7. Roadways will be constructed to mini- PC mize adverse impacts on environmentally sensitive areas, as specified in the Conservation Coastal Zone Management Element. 8. Develop a transportation network which C is in harmony with the existing land- scapes and natural amenities. approval of nigher zoning densities - environmental impact state- ment required for environ- mentally sensitive areas - 1985 traffic circulation study and thoroughfare plan adopted 9. Pramte and encourage citizen input C - through transportation into decisions affecting the traffic planning committee circulation system. - through planning and zoning commission and MC public hearings 10. All roadway improvements should be C - through transportation - coordinated with appropriate local, planning caimittee regional and state agencies. OSJECPIVES - G. CONSERVATION AND COASTAL STATUS ACTIONS TAKEN ZONE MANAGEMENT 1. Maintain air quality at safe levels. C 2. Protect groundwater systems from C development impacts and implement water use practices that insure the continued supply of potable water for urban uses. 3. Maintain and improve the water quality PC in the county's rivers, lakes and wet- land systems. 23 - review of stationary potent- ial air pollutants at time of developmnt proposals - revised excavation and miming ordinance - used Florida aquifer for expanded water service - retention and detention re- quirements in Stonivater Management Ordinance - coordination for development reviews - wtitland protection in site - plan ordinance - TUR ' s UWI:k:I:IVLS - G. CONSERVATION AND COASTAL STATUS ACTIONS TAKEN ZONE MANAGEMM 3. Continued... - establishment of littoral zones and water management standards - stormwater management ord- inance - completed inventory of point - source discharges into the Indian River initiate 4. Preserve the native fauna and flora. PC - "Save Our Shores" land acquis- ition of coastal strand - county tree ordinance imple- mented - improvement of preservation on development sites 5. Develop a coordinate) program to rec- PC - identification of historic ognize and preserve scenic routes and sites continuing and historic sites. - scenic and historic roads ord- inance adopted - Jungle Trail management plan adopted - historic buildings survey completed 6. Protect the social, econanic and Ln- PC - TDR's protect estuarine wet- vironmental attributes of the coastal lands system. - dock construction regulations protect shoreline vegetation - county dune setback line est- ablished - sea turtle protection ord. - mangrove protection - beach preservation plan completed OB,JBCTIVES - H. RECREATION & OPEN SPACE — STATUS ACTIONS TIVM 1. To provide a wide range of recreational PC opportunities which meet the current and future demands of all segments of the community. 24 - Purchased beachfront land for parks with $5 million bond issue - CatMitted funds for south county park - Golden Sands park developed - contributions to Vero Beach recreation program - funds provided to sebastian-s - recreation facilities s OLRJEX<TIVES - H. RECREATION & OPEN SPACE STATUS ACTIONS TAKEN 2. To use natural resources to full ad- PC vantage in meeting recreation and open space needs. 3. To preserve the unique and irreplaceable PC natural resources. 4. To coordinate with state, regional PC and municipal levels of government in providing recreational opport- unities. 5. To integrate recreational space and PC facilities into all urban residential areas. - beachfront land acquisition —expansion of Wabasso Causeway boat ramp - proposed to purchase of McKee Jungle Gardens - adopted Jungle Trail manage- ment plan —reviewed zoning regulations in 1985 - complemented state's $5 mill. save our coast funding - supported CARL program acqui- sition proposals - coordinated with St. Johns River 4= in upper basin reo- reation planning - provided recreation funds to Vero Beach - Sebastian and Fellsmere 1985 zoning regulations up- dated - PRO provisions enacted OBJECTIVES - I. HOUSING STATUS ACTIONS TAKEN 1. Indian River County will encourage the PCJU - land development regulations development of a safe and ,convenient provide housing variety housing supply which is accessible to - higher densities have lower public services and facilities. The cost housing county will encourage the private sector to offer housing with a wide range of housing costs in order to satisfy the needs of all income levels within the commnity. OBJECTIVES - J. UTILITY STATUS ACTIONS TAKEN 1. State the interrelationship between C - coordinated with Florida power generating facilities and trans- Power and Light company mission lines. 2. Recognize the need for electrical power U - followed policies within to serve existing facilities and proj- county jurisdiction ected growth. 25 O JI=IVFS - K. INTEROOMWE NRAL STATUS ACTIONS TAKEN 1. The county must keep the adjacent C counties, municipalities, and other taxing districts continuously in- forned as to the development and implementation of the Comprehensive Plan. 2. All requests for annexation in the U unincorporated areas of the county shall be administered in accordance with Chapter 171 Florida Statutes, 3. Indian River County will continue to C coordinate with the county school board and other local governments which provide services to the unincorporated areas of the county. A. Indian River County wi.'.l continue to C coordinate with all regional, state and federal agencies. A. Coordination with Treasure Coast C Regional Planning Council shall be a priority in coordinating the implementation of the Comprehensive Plan and major develolsnent projects. B. Revisions, requinTents or requests C regarding the Comprehensive Plan shall be sukmitted to the Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council and the State of Florida, Department of Community Affairs. C. Particular attention will be given C to coordination of any and all information with respect to the Indian River County Solid Waste Program. The County Health Dept. shall be kept will informed. - participated with regional and local entities - participated in site plan review process - annexations have followed Florida statutes - informal coordination 1990 plan proposes more formal. coordination - coordinated through site plan review process - coordinated with SJRLvM, Facet, FDER, FDNB - continual coordination - continual review, and connent and coordination - have maintained good coord- ination with the Health Dept. OVERALL REVIEW OF THE PLAN There are several areas within the 1982 Comprehensive Plan that contain deficiencies, as defined by today's standards. For example, there were no goals specified for each element, and many objectives and policies were mixed or absent. For those objective included within the 1982 plan, many were general or contained no directional pattern. There was also no method of evaluation, nor were there methods for the implementation of the elements, with the exception of the Sewer and Water Elements and the Recreation and Open Space Element. In addition, there were inconsistencies among the elements with regard to the overall format of the plan. Unlike the 1990 comprehensive plan, the 1982 Plan was based upon the requirements of the 1975 Act. The 1975 Act was structured to provide a more general direction for planning. As such, the Act was much less specific than the 1985 Act in mandating plan content. Indian River County, however, has been active in planning, has provided the necessary urban services, has maintained an adequate level of service and has worked to satisfy its residents' needs. Overall, Indian River County has maintained a pro -planning attitude. As a result, the county has followed the policies of the 1982 Plan. There have been only a limited number of amendments to the 1982 Plan, mostly minor changes that have served to strengthen the plan. With regard to land use, the amendments have served to reduce densities or to expand parts of the Commercial -Industrial Districts. The 1985 Act is much more specific than was the 1975 Act. By compelling governing bodies to demonstrate the economic feasibility of their comprehensive plans, the 1985 Act ensures that goals, objectives and policies of the 1990 Plan will be realistically and economically achievable. The 1990 Comprehensive Plan for Indian River County is not only more detailed than the 1982 plan; it will also be easier to implement and evaluate. The Implementation Matrix for each element identifies the actions which must be taken, who is responsible for the action, the timeframe for the action and any funding required. The Evaluation Matrix shows the measure for each objective and the timeframe in achieving the objective. These matrices not only provide effective tools for the county to implement the plan, but they will make it easier for the county to conduct future evaluations. Indian River County has evaluated and appraised its 1982 plan and the Comprehensive Plan for 1990 will replace the 1982 plan upon state approval. 27 PURPOSE AND INTENT Florida Statute, Chapter 163 mandates that all local governments shall have in place a comprehensive plan. In addition, the statute requires the local planning agency to "monitor and oversee the effectiveness and status of the comprehensive plan and recommend to the governing body such changes in the comprehensive plan as may from time to time be required," (FS 163.3174(5)). Finally, the statute requires that "the local planning agency shall prepare periodic reports on the comprehensive plan, which shall be sent to the governing body at least once every five years," (FS 163.3191(1)). It is the intent of Indian River County to comply with mandated requirements in preparing the Evaluation and Appraisal Report (EAR) for the 1982 Indian River County Comprehensive Plan. This report shall assess the successes and failures of the 1982 Comprehensive Plan as a whole, as well as the ability of each individual element to serve as a policy document upon which decisions affecting the county are based. Any changes made to the 1982 Comprehensive Plan shall be addressed either in this report or written within the Comprehensive Plan Update, which will be submitted to the state for review in September, 1989. Since the 1982 Plan was created under different requirements than those currently mandated by Chapter 163 and 9J-5, FAC, many of the objectives of the plan are unmeasurable. For these reasons, the results of the EAR for the 1982 Plan will be a summarization of the successes and failures of each element, based upon evaluation of the degree of achievement of the elements' objectives. An evaluation matrix will supplement the general evaluation. LAND USE ELEMENT "> There are two objectives identified in the 1982 Indian River County Comprehensive Plan Land Use Element: 1. Urban development shall be encouraged to fill in available land closest to service areas of the county so as to avoid "spot development". Lower density and intensity shall take place in areas that are environmentally sensitive and in areas outside the urban service perimeter. 2. Incompatible land uses should be separated from one another. Where they do abut, appropriate physical or natural buffers will be established. ° Assessment All urban development, with the exception of that occurring in the I-95/SR 60 Node, has occurred east of I-95 and in proximity to urban services. The 1985 comprehensive rezoning of all the land in the county has ensured compatibility of recent development with the Land Use Plan. At least one hundred amendments to the Land Use Plan have been submitted since the 1982 Plan. Of those adopted, most amendments served to expand development areas within the county. Adopted amendments to the Land Use Plan have consistently maintained the integrity of the plan. Present land use regulations, the revision of the Zoning Code in 1989, and market influences have combined to keep most development in the vicinity of Vero Beach and Sebastian. The most intensive development has occurred where water and sewer are available, areas such as SR 60, US 1 adjacent to city limits and portions of the north island. A lack of services and facilities has resulted in development at lower densities in outlying areas. There are, however, some unintended disincentives for infill development caused by higher impact fees in the more developed areas. Areas designated as environmentally sensitive in the 1982 Plan have been protected from significant development. The Transfer of Development Rights (TDR) provisions in the Indian River County Code of Laws and Ordinances for Planned Residential Developments (PRD's) has helped to maintain many of the wetland areas along the Indian River. The Grove Isle PRD is one example of a TDR within Indian River County. Conservation easements, such as the one used for Orchid Isle Estates, have also been successful in preserving environmental areas as called for in the 1982 Land Use Element. As revised in 1989, the county's zoning regulations include specific buffer requirements by land use type. New development is required to have buffering when adjacent to dissimilar uses. These SANITARY SEWER ELEMENT There are three objectives identified in the Sanitary Sewer Element of the 1982 Comprehensive Plan: 1. Reduce costs of wastewater treatment operations by establishing private owned and county owned subre- gional treatment facilities. 2. Septic tanks may be used whenever feasible. 3. Effect the sanitary severing of all unincorporated areas consistent with the growth management policies of the Land Use Element. ` Assessment The County has been successful in providing wastewater service to its residents through a combination of public and private facilities. Since the 1982 Plan, Indian River County has established 2 county -owned wastewater treatment facilities and is negotiating with General Development Utilities (GDU) to purchase its facility for the southern portion of the county. Additionally, the county has taken over several smaller facilities that privately could not maintain minimum operational standards. Finally, the county is making plans for future construction of a wastewater treatment facility in the Northern portion of the county. The county currently serves 29,900 customers, maintains 834,240 linear feet of gravity sewer line, has constructed 419,760 linear feet of force main, and manages 55 lift stations. Indian River County, through coordination by the Department of Environmental Health, issues permits for septic tanks whenever state and local requirements have been met. In recent years, an average of 1000-1200 permits for septic tanks had been issued annually. Through the expansion of wastewater collection and treatment facilities, many of the areas previously using septic tanks have been connected to the County systems. It has been projected that, by 1995, 408 of existing residential units and 60% of existing non-residential establishments will be connected to the county systems. As a result, the number of permits for septic tanks will be significantly lower in the future. The county provides wastewater treatment facilities with revenue derived through impact fees, developer dedications, assessments and other appropriate sources. As a result, in most cases the county has been able to maintain its services consistent with the growth management policies of the Land Use Element. The specific service areas served by the public facilities include: * the southern portion of the Barrier Island, served by the City of Vero Boach; * the Vero Beach Highlands area served by the GDU Plant; b! POTABLE WATER ELEMENT The Potable Water Element for the 1982 Comprehensive Plan has three objectives: 1. Conserve and protect all sources of water resources from pollution and over utilization. 2. Provide those users within the Urban Service areas with an economical water service. 3. The county shall establish innovative means for extension of safe and efficient potable water service. ' Assessment Indian River County has established the south county Reverse Osmosis (RO) Water Treatment Plant, to provide potable water to county residents. Prior to 1982, the amount of water conservation in the county was hard to determine, since the county contained many private wells and private water systems. With the provision of public water service to many areas, the county now maintains better control of and provides for the conservation of water resources. The county currently serves 5,197 units and approximately 13,000 customers with potable water. By providing potable water to many areas, the county has reduced the number of private wells using the shallow aquifer. With its RO system, the county provides water from a more reliable source (Floridan aquifer), ensuring adequate quantity and quality of water in the future. The county has also adopted a landscape ordinance which provides for the use of less irrigation water. The 1990 Plan will provide for further control of the conservation and protection of the water resources. Economical water service in the county is maintained in several ways. With its new RO plant, the county has not only provided safe and adequate service; it has also provided for protection of shallow aquifer water by using the Floridan aquifer as its water source. The county has also strengthened the water system with its purchase and reparation of small private plants. In addition, Indian River County has proposed and designed a regional water plant for the northern portion of the county. When this system is in place, a substantial number of small water systems will be eliminated, and their customers will receive economical service from the county. The county extends its water services and facilities through the use of impact fees, developer dedications, assessments and other appropriate sources. The county Utilities Department is established as an enterprise system which allows the county to maintain and expand its potable water system where economically feasible to accommodate future expansion of the urban service area. 31 DRAINAGE ELEMENT The Drainage Element of the 1982 Comprehensive Plan has the following objectives: 1. Insure that all areas of the county where development is existing or proposed have sufficient drainage capabilities. 2. Enhance water quality values through use of drainage practices which will eliminate pollutant loadings from receiving waters. 3. Coordinate with the St. John's River Water Management District, the municipalities, and the drainage districts in solving drainage problems on a county -wide basis. 4. The county will support development of a comprehensive area -wide surface management program. 5. The county will encourage development of drainage faciliti^s in unincorporated areas meeting priority needs. Assessment Indian River County, along with six local water control districts which are independent taxing authorities, and the St. John's River Water Management District, collectively control drainage in the developed and developing areas of the county. In addition to drainage control, these governing units address stormwater quality through development requirements such as storage requirements, outfall limitations, and impervious surface controls. This process enhances water quality and reduces pollutants in receiving waters, Indian River County has additionally adopted a stormwater management ordinance since the 1982 plan. As a result of its collective controls, the county, the St. John's River Water Management District, the municipalities and the drainage districts have prevented county -wide drainage problems from occurring in proposed and existing development. The county has also supported the development of a comprehensive area -wide surface water management program. Although a program has not yet been established, many proposals have been developed, and the 1990 Plan will pursue a more definite surface water management program. 7 SOLID WASTE ELEMENT The Solid Waste Element for the 1982 Comprehensive Plan contains two objectives: 1. The county will continue to serve as the responsible local government for developing and operating solid waste disposalfacilities. 2. The county will study possible resource recovery methods and will undertake approaches which prove to be economically feasible. " Assessment The establishment of a Solid Waste Disposal District has enhanced the development and operation of solid waste disposal facilities. By creating this district, the county has established a solid waste enterprise system which derives revenues from assessment fees based upon land use classifications. This district includes both the municipalities and the unincorporated areas of the county. It also provides the county with an equitable and adequate funding mechanism for solid waste activities. The county closed Segment #1 of the landfill by mid-July, 1989, and opened Segment #2 to accept solid waste at that time. Segment #2 has a fill capacity of 1.4 million cubic yards and will maintain its active state until mid-July, 1994. The landfill has a 'lifespan of over twenty years. The county has completed its study of possible resource recovery methods as part of the Solid Waste Master Plan. As of yet, no resource recovery center has been established. With the creation of the Solid Waste Recycling Program in July, 1989, the county plans to reduce the volume of its waste by 30%, by July 1994, 8 TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT There are several objectives identified in to the 1982 Transportation Element: 1. Develop an effective traffic circulation system which meets the existing and anticipated needs of county residents. 2. Provide adequate safety standards in the design of new and improved roadways. 3. Insure the future roadway network is financially feasible. 4. Coordinate the traffic circulation system with other transportation modes such as bus, taxi, bikeways and rail. 5. Provide for adequate flexibility in the design of new street construction or improvements. 6. Coordinate development intensity with the carrying capacity of the existing roadway. 7. Roadways will be constructed to minimize adverse impacts on environmentally sensitive areas, as specified in the Conservation and Coastal Zone Management Element. 8. Develop a transportation network which is in harmony with the existing landscapes and natural amenities. 9. Promote and encourage citizen input into decisions affecting the traffic circulation system. 10. All roadway improvements should be coordinated with appropriate local, regional and state agencies. ` Assessment In an effort to develop an effective traffic circulation system, Indian River County in 1985 adopted the Major Street and Highway Program. In addition, a Traffic Circulation Plan and a 20 Year Transportation Capital Improvement Program (TCIP) were adopted to help meet the existing and anticipated needs of county residents. Since the 1982 Plan, the county has constructed Indian River Boulevard and Lindsey Road. Financially, the county has adopted 5 Year and 20 Year Transportation Capital Improvements Programs (TCIP). The county has adopted traffic impact fees, a six cent local option gas tax, and a one cent local option sales tax. These. programs will help ensure that• the future roadway network is financially feasible. 9 The county received a grant from the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) for the purpose of developing the transportation planning capability necessary for the county's transition into urban county status with the establishment of an Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) for transportation planning. The county has used the funds to hire a consultant to prepare the Traffic Circulation Element of the 1990 Comprehensive Plan. Development impacts on roadways are reviewed through the Traffic Impact Analyses mandated by the site plan ordinance. In addition, there is a review of roadways prior to the approval of higher zoning densities. These processes have been successful in maintaining service levels on the county's roadways. In addition to the traffic impact analysis, the county requires that an Environmental Impact Analysis be prepared where roadway construction occurs in environmentally sensitive areas. This minimizes adverse impacts that may occur due to roadway construction. With regard to the flexibility in design of new street construction and improvements, the county has followed the adopted state design and construction guidelines. These have been the basis of all county roadway construction, including the recently built Indian River Boulevard and Lindsey Road. Marginal access easements have been acquired, intersections have been signalized and roads have been widened when necessary. The county currently owns 221.36 miles of paved road and 414.78 miles of unpaved road. The county has recognized the importance of the relationship between the transportation network and the existing landscape and natural amenities. In order to meet this aesthetic objective, the county adopted a Traffic Circulation Study and Thoroughfare Plan in 1985. The policies regarding aesthetics have been followed, and the county has included comparable policies in the 1990 Plan. In an effort to provide necessary information regarding roadway improvements, the county must continually coordinate with appropriate local, regional and state agencies, Indian River County coordinates roadway improvements with local officials through the Transportation Planning Committee and the Federal Department of Transportation (FDOT). Citizen participation is an important element in the development of a good transportation network. Residents of Indian River County have been able to provide public input through the Transportation Planning Committee, as well as through the county Planning and Zoning Commission. Efforts in these areas have enhanced the decision-making process for traffic circulation matters. 10 CONSERVATION AND COASTAL ZONE MANAGEMENT ELEMENT. The objectives for the Conservation and Coastal Zone Management Element of the 1982 Comprehensive Plan include: 1. Maintain air quality at safe levels. 2. Protect groundwater systems from development impacts and implement water use practices that insure the continued supply of potable water for urban uses. 3. Maintain and improve the water quality in the county's rivers, lakes and wetland systems. 4. Preserve the native fauna and flora. 5. Develop a coordinated program to recognize and preserve scenic routes and historic sites. 6. Protect the social, economic and environmental attributes of the Coastal system. " Assessment Safe air quality levels in Indian River County have been maintained through the review of potential stationary air pollutant sources at the time of development proposals in coordination with the Department of Health and Rehabilitation Services and the Public Health unit. Presently, there is a sufficient supply of potable water for urban use. Expansion of public water service has occurred with establishment of the regional RO Plan which uses the Floridan aquifer as its source of water. The stormwater management ordinance further controls usage and treatment of potable water through stormwater retention and detention requirements. This results in filtration of the first inch of stormwater, thereby enhancing shallow aquifer quality and quantity. The revision of the excavation and mining ordinance to protect the coastal sandridge up to the 25' foot contour was effected by the county in 1988 and constitutes another means of protecting potable water supplies. Many steps have been taken since the 1982 plan to maintain and improve the water quality in the county's rivers, lakes and wetland systems. Indian River County has coordinated with jurisdictional agencies for development reviews. The county site plan ordinance has helped in wetland protection through the transfer of development rights. The county has established littoral zone and water quality standards for created waterbodies. The 1990 plan will expand upon required standards of water quality and will include measures to improve and protect such areas as the Sebastian River, Indian River Lagoon and various isolated wetlands. 12 NJ There has been further improvement in the preservation of development sites, largely due to the implementation of the County Tree Protection Ordinance, which includes mangrove protection. The need to acquire land for environmentally critical areas has lead to the organization of "Save Our Shares", which privately works toward the land acquisition of coastal strands. The protection of historic roads has been completed with the adoption of the Scenic and Historic Roads Ordinance. Further protection has been ensured with the adoption of the Jungle Trail Management Plan. In addition, a Historic Buildings survey has been completed for the unincorporated area of Indian River County. Additional specific protective ordinances are needed, and the 1990 Plan will include more specific programs to preserve and protect the scenic and historic sites in Indian River County. Several steps have been taken since the 1982 plan to protect the social, economic and environmental attributes of the coastal system. Incentives to developers to transfer development rights have increased the protection of estuarine wetlands. Regulations for dock construction have minimized the impact on shoreline vegetation and seagras:;es.- Indian River County has established a dune stabilization setback line to help protect the dune system. The county has also adopted a Sea Turtle Protection Ordinance and regulations for the protection of mangroves. These efforts, along with improved and coordinated intergovernmental efforts, have provided protection for the Indian River Lagoon and the county's coastal system. 13 • a' :7 a 11 RECREATION AND OPEN SPACE ELEMENT There are five objectives to the Recreation and Open Space Element of the 1982 Plan: 1. To provide a wide range of recreational opportunities which meet the current and future demands of all segments of the community. 2. To use natural resources to full advantage in meeting recreation and open space needs. 3. To preserve the unique and irreplaceable natural resources. 4. To coordinate with state, regional and municipal levels of government in providing recreational opportunities. 5. To integrate recreational space and facilities into all urban residential areas. " Assessment Indian River County has taken several steps to provide a wide range of recreational opportunities. Through a $5 million bond issue, the county has purchased beachfront land for parks. In addition, funds have been committed for the purchase of a South County Park. The county has also provided funds to the City of Sebastian for recreation facilities and has contributed to the City of Vero Beach's recreation programs. Other programs include the construction of a golfcourse in the Hobart area and county improvements made at the fairgrounds site. These programs have provided increased recreational opportunities for county residents. Policies to be incorporated in the 1990 plan will provide for future recreational needs throughout Indian River County. The acquisition of beachfront land is one of the means Indian River County has used to provide areas for recreation and open space. The expansion of the boat ramp on the Wabasso Causeway by the county has accommodated increased recreational needs. Other recreation improvements are being included in the 1990 plan to provide for future recreation and open space needs. The preservation of unique and irreplaceable natural resources has been addressed as well. A proposal has been made to purchase the McKee Jungle Gardens, and plans have been made to regulate and maintain Jungle Trail. These projects have been supplemented by the revision of zoning regulations for the county in 1985. These and the regulations in the 1990 Plan will help solidify the preservation of the county's unique and irreplaceable natural resources. The county has coordinated with many governmental factions in reference to the provision of recreational facilities. Indian 14 HOUSING ELEMENT The objective for the 1982 Housing Element is that: 1. Indian River County will encourage the development of a safe and convenient housing supply which is accessible to public services and facilities. The county will encourage the private sector to offer housing with a wide range of housing costs in order to satisfy the needs of all income levels within the community. Assessment Monetary support for the provision of housing has been provided by the county to the Housing Authority. The county, however, has not been directly involved in the home building/providing process. Through its land development regulations, the county permits a broad range of housing types, including single family, multiple family and mobile homes with various densities from less than one unit per acre to fourteen units per acre. The highest densities are most likely to have lower cost housing. Presently, there is no special consideration for lower cost housing with regard to permits, codes, improvements and impact fees. In addition, there is little direct action on the part of the county government to develop housing. However, Indian River County's lowest income area, Gifford, has made use of grant funds for sewer and water service. The county is examining future initiatives to improve the housing supply in Indian River County. Several recent developments, funded by a variety of federal and state funding programs, have provided additional housing units for lower income persons. One development is Treasure Coast Village. This is a 71 lot single-family subdivision developed by the Housing Authority. A broad range of financing methods were used. Victory Park, a farm labor housing project, has 50 units in Phase I and 50 units under construction in Phase II. The project was funded through the Farmers Home Administration. The Housing Authority has provided direct funding assistance or managed funding for home rehabilitation of 100 units through grants and low cost loans. The housing Authority has provided housing assistance to over 900 families per year. 16 UTILITY (ELECTRICAL POWER) ELEMENT There are two objectives to the Utility (Electrical Power) Element of the 1982 Comprehensive Plan: 1. State the inter -relationship between power generating facilities and transmission lines; 2. Recognize the need for electrical power to serve existing facilities and projected growth. - Assessment It was a requirement of the 1975 Local Government Comprehensive Planning Act that all local governments complete a Utility Element as part of their comprehensive plan. Indian River County has coordinated with FPL and with the Vero Beach Municipal Electric Company. In so doing the county has reviewed each utility's 10 -year utility facilities plan. This coordination has helped to avoid conflict with local plans and development patterns throughout the county. The county has encouraged practical use of underground utilities, as well as the collective use of utility corridors and easements. Indian River County has developed land use regulations which encourage the location of electrical facilities, transmission stations, substations and T.V. towers so that a minimum land use and aesthetic conflict occurs. The county is presently amending its tower regulations to further avoid such conflicts. Through zoning and land use regulations, the county has required appropriate buffering and landscaping in an effort to minimize aesthetic conflict. In addition, the county enforces the Energy Efficiency Codes through the Building Department. The county has been and will continue to support and cooperate with federal, state and local government research for present and future energy needs. Indian River County will continue to coordinate with FPL to ensure that sufficient electrical power is maintained in the county. 17 INTERGOVERNMENTAL COORDINATION The Intergovernmental Coordination Element for the 1982 Comprehensive Plan contains four objectives: 1. The county must keep the adjacent counties, municipalities, and other taxing districts continuously informed as to the development and implementation of the Comprehensive Plan. 2. All request for annexation in the unincorporated areas of the county shall be administered in accordance with Chapter 171 Florida Statutes. 3. Indian River County will continue to coordinate with the County School Board and other local governments which provide services to the unincorporated areas of the county. 4. Indian River County will continue to coordinate with all Regional, Scate and Federal agencies. A. Coordination with Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council shall be a priority in coordinating the implementation of the Comprehensive Plan and major development projects. B. Revisions, requirements or requests regarding the Comprehensive Plan shall be submitted to the Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council and the State of Florida, Department of Community Affairs. C. Particular attention will be given to coordination of any and all information with respect to the Indian River County Solid Waste Program. The County Health Department shall be kept well informed. Assessment Indian River County has participated with regional and local entities for the coordination of regional and local matters, primarily through various review processes. The county has also maintained contact with state, regional and local governments with regard to the development and implementation of the Comprehensive Plan. This includes the creation of the Comprehensive Plan Technical Advisory Committee for 1990 comprehensive plan development. Indian River has coordinated with the municipalities within the county regarding annexation in the unincorporated areas of the county. Those annexations that have occurred since adoption of the 1982 Plan have followed the regulations specified in the State Statute. 18 Indian River County has both formally and informally coordinated with the County School Hoard and other local governments which provide services to the unincorporated areas of the county. There are several specific areas in which Indian River County has successfully coordinated with local governments. Examples include the establishment of a county -wide traffic impact fee system and the creation of a county/city building department. The county has also participated with the cities of Vero Beach and Sebastian in joint recreation programs. Representatives from both Indian River County and its municipalities have established several joint committees, including the Transportation Planning Committee, the Economic Development Council, and the Parks and Recreation Committee. There has also been joint county/city meetings between Indian River County and the cities of Vero Beach and Sebastian. The 1990 Plan will include provisions for more formal coordination mechanisms between Indian River County and other governmental entities. Indian River County has consistently coordinated with the Treasure Coast Regional Manning Council as well as state and federal agencies. Coordination has taken place primarily through the project and plan review processes. Indian River County has also coordinated with the Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council in the implementation of the 1962 Comprehensive Plan. Any revisions, requirements or requests regarding the Comprehensive Plan have been submitted to the necessary governmental bodies. In addition, Indian River County has continued coordination with the Health Department regarding the County's septic tank and well permitting programs. The 1990 Plan will ensure that effective coordination with other governmental bodies continues. 19 EVALUATION MATRIX STATUS KEY . C - COMPLETE PC - PARTIALLY COWLETE N - NO ACTION U - UNMEASURABLE OWECTIVES - A. LAND USE STATUS ACTIONS TAKEN 1. Urban development shall be encouraged PC/U - land use, zoning, market to fill in available land closest to influences kept market close service areas of the county so as to to municipalities avoid "spot development". Lower - lack of services kept out - density and intensity shall take lying areas at lower densi- place in areas that are environ- ties mentally sensitive and in areas outside the urban service perimeter. - environmentally sensitive designation, 'I'DR's for PRD's maintained river wetlands - enacted regulations requiring 2. Incattpatible land uses should be PC/U new developments to provide separated from one another. Where buffering they do abut, appropriate physical or natural buffers will be established. OBJECTIVES - B. SANITARY SEWER STATUS ACTIONS TAXEN 1. Reduce costs of wastewater treatment operations by establishing privately owned and county owned subregional treatment facilities. 2. Septic tanks may be used whenever feasible. 3. Effect the sanitary sewering of all unincorporated areas consistent with the growth management policies of tiie Land Use Element. PC - established county arced facilities - negotiating w/GDU to buy plant for south area - planning to build plant in north county C - permits given when state and local requirements are meat C - facilities extended through impact fees, developer dedi- cation, assessments - sanitary sewer capacity has increased by 2.65 mgd (null - ion gallons per day) 20 OBJECTIVES - C. POTABLE WAFER STATUS ACTIONS TAKEN 1. Conserve and protect all sources of PC - reverse osmosis (RD) Plant water resources from pollution and established - landscape ordinance adapted averutilization. - coordination with the Dept. of Environmental Health and SJMM 2. Provide those users within the urban C - reverse osmosis (RO) Plant service area with an economical water established - proposal and design of north service. county regional water plant 3. The county shall establish innovative C - extension of county system means for extension of safe and effici- capacity by 3.03 mgd ent potable water service. million gallons per day) OWWrIVES - D. DRAINAGE STATUS AMONS TAKEN 1. Insure that all areas of the county C - adopted stonTwater management where development is existing or ordinance proposed have sufficient drainage 2. capability. Enhance water quality values through PC - stormwater treatment detent- use of drainage practices which will ion ponds required by devel- eliminate pollutant loadings from oper receiving waters. - installed storm sewer culvert at 12th and 16th Streets east of 20th Ave 3. Coordinate with the St. Johns River C - coordination is maintained water management district, the munic- ipalities, and the drainage districts in solving drainage problems on a county -wide basis. 4. The county will support development of U - proposals have been developed a comprehensive area -wide surface man- - nothing tangible established agement program. 5. The county will encourage developrent of PC - facilities developed and drainage facilities in tmincorporated maintained as needed areas meeting priority needs. - Utteral It is 808 complete IN 21 OB=IVES - E. SOLID WASTE STATUS ACTIONS TAKEN 1. The county will continue to serve as the responsible local government for developing and operating solid waste disposal facilities. 2. The county will study possible re- source recovery methods and will undertake approaches which prove to be economically feasible. C - solid waste disposal district established - new segment of landfill developed C - completed as part of solid waste master plan - solid waste recycling program established by July 1, 1989 to reduce volume OBJECTIVES - F. TRANSPORTATION STATUS ACTIONS TAKEN 1. Develop an effective traffic circu C lation system which meets existing and anticipated needs of county residents. 2. Provide adequate safety standards in C the design of new and improved roadways. 3. Ensure the future roadway network is C financially feasible. A. Coordinate the traffic circulation sys- PC ten with other transportation modes such as bus, taxi, bikeways and rail. 5. Provide for adequate flexibility in the PC design of new street construction or or improvements. 22 - adopted 1985 Major Street and Highway Program - prepared traffic circulation study - adopted 20 Year Transport- ation Capital Improvements Program (TCIP) - Construction of Indian River Blvd and Lindsey Road - adopted state safety guidelines - adopted 5 year and 20 year Transportation Capital Improvements Programs (4CIP) - adopted comprehensive bikeway and sidewalk plan - follow adopted state design and construction guidelines for R -O -W protection - The county has acquired over 67.32 square acres (based upon thoroughfare plan and does not include internal subdivision roads) of W1 since 1982 ' OBJECTIVES - F. TRANSPORTATION STATUS ACTIONS TAKEN 6. Coordinate development intensity with C the carrying of the existing roadway. 7. Roadways will be constructed to mini- PC mize adverse impacts on environmentally sensitive areas, as specified in the Conservation Coastal Zone Management Element. S. Develop a transportation network which C is in harmony with the existing land- scapes and natural ameiities. 9. Promote and encourage citizen input C into decisions affecting the traffic circulation system. E 10. All roadway improvements should be C coordinated with appropriate local, regional and state agencies. - traffic impact analysis requirement adopted in site plan ordinance - review of roadways prior to approval of higher zoning densities - environmental impact state- ment required for environ- mentally sensitive areas - 1985 traffic circulation study and thoroughfare plan adopted - through transportation planning committee - through planning and zoning canmi.ssion and I3CC public hearings - through transportation planning caTmittee OaJPS IVES - G. CONSERVATION AND COASTAL STATUS ACTIONS TAKEN ZONE MANAGEMENT 1. Maintain air quality at safe levels. C 2. Protect groundwater systems from C development impacts and implement water use practices that insure the continued supply of potable water for urban uses. 3. Maintain and improve the water duality PC in the county's rivers, lakes and wet - 461, land systems. 23 - review of stationary potent- ial air pollutants at time of development proposals - revised excavation and mining ordinance - used Florida aquifer for expanded water service - retention and detention re- quirements in Stornaaater Management Ordinance - coordination for development reviews - wutland protection .in site - plan ordinance - TDR's OBJECTIVES - G. CONSERVATION AND COASTAL STATUS ACTIONS TARN ZONE W01AGLME T 3. Continued... A. Preserve the native fauna and flora 5. Develop a coordinated program to rec- ognize and preserve scenic routes and and historic sites. 6. Protect the social, econanic and en- vironmental attributes of the coastal system. - establishment of littoral zones and water management standards - stonwater management ord- inance - completed inventory of point - source discharges into the Indian River initiate PC - "Save Our Shores" land acquis- ition of coastal strand - county tree ordinance imple- mented - improvement of preservation on development sites PC - identification of historic sites continuing - scenic and historic roads ord- inance adopted - Jungle Trail management plan adopted - historic buildings survey completed PC - TDR's protect estuarine wet- lands - dock construction regulations protect shoreline vegetation - county dune setback line est- ablished - sea turtle protection Ord. - mangrove protection - beach preservation plan completed OaJOCTIVE.S - H. RECi2EATION & OPEN SPACE STATUS ACTIONS TAKEN 1. To provide a wide range of recreational PC opportunities which meet the current and future demands of all segments of the comm mity. 24 - purchased beachfront land for Parks with $5 million boiv3 issue - ccannitted funds for south county park - Golden Sands park developed - contributions to Vero Beach recreation program funds provided to Selkistian's - recreation facilities OBJECTIVES - H. RECREATION & OPEN SPACE STATUS ACTIONS TAKEN 2. Th use natural resources to full ad- PC vantage in meeting recreation and open space needs. 3. To preserve the unique and irreplaceable PC natural resources. A. To coordinate with state, regional and im nicipal levels of government in providing recreational opport- unities. - beachfront land acquisition - expansion of Wabasso Causeway boat ramp - proposed to purchase of McKee Jungle Gardens - adopted Jungle Trail manage- ment plan - reviewed zoning regulations in 1985 PC - ccnplemented state's $5 mill. save our coast funding - supported CARL program acqui- sition proposals - coordinated with St. Johns River N4,II7 in upper basin rec- reation planning - provided recreation funds to vero Beach - Sebastian and Fellsmere 5. To integrate recreational space and PC - 1985 zoning regulations up - facilities into all urban residential dated areas. - PRD provisions enacted OBJWTIVES - I. HOUSING STATUS ACTIONS TAKEN Indian River County will encourage the PC/U development of a safe and convenient housing supply which is accessible to public services and facilities. The county will encourage the private sector to offer housing with a wide range of housing costs in order to satisfy the needs of all income levels within the caammity. - land development regulations provide housing variety - higher densities have lower cost housing OBJDCTIVES - J. UTILITY STATUS ACTIONS TAKEN 1. State the interrelationship between C - coordinated with Florida power generating facilities and trans- Power and Light company mission lines. 41-' 2. Recognize the need for electrical power U - follcsweJ policies within to serve existing facilities and proj- county jurisdiction ected growth. 25 0 OBJECTIVES - K. MERGDVEPMENTAL STATUS ACTIONS TAKEN 1. The county must keep the adjacent C - participated with regional counties, municipalities, and other and local entities taxing districts continuously in- - participated in site plan formed as to the development and review process implementation of the Comprehensive Plan. 2. All requests for annexation in the U - annexations have followed unincorporated areas of the county Florida statutes shall be administered in accordance with Chapter 171 Florida Statutes. 3. Indian River County will continue to C - informal coordination coordinate with the county school board 1990 plan proposes more formal and other local governments which provide coordination services to the unincorporated areas of the county. 4. Indian River County will continue to C - coordinated through coordinate with all regional, state site plan review process and federal agencies. - coordinated with sciM m, FDOT, FDER, FDNR A. Coordination with Treasure Coast C - continual coordination Regional Planning Council shall be a priority in coordinating the implementation of the Comprehensive Plan and major development projects. B. Revisions, requirments or requests C - continual review, and caiment regarding the Comprehensive Plan and coordination shall he submitted to the Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council and the State of Florida, Department of Ccmmunity Affairs. C. Particular attention will be given C - have maintained good coord- to coordination of any and all ination with the Health Dept. information with respect to the Indian River County Solid Waste Program. The County Health Dept. shall be kept will informed. 26 ( OVERALL REVIEW OF THE PLAN M There are several areas within the 1982 Comprehensive Plan that contain deficiencies, as defined by today's standards. For example, there were no goals specified for each element, and many objectives and policies were mixed or absent, For those objective included within the 1982 plan, many were general or contained no directional pattern. There was also no method of evaluation, nor were there methods for the implementation of the elements, with the exception of the Sewer and Water Elements and the Recreation and Open Space Element. In addition, there were inconsistencies among the elements with regard to the overall format of the plan. Unlike the 1990 comprehensive plan, the 1982 Plan was based upon the requirements of the 1975 Act. The 1975 Act was structured to provide a more general direction for planning. As such, the Act was much less specific than the 1985 Act in mandating plan content. Indian River County, however, has been active in planning, has provided the necessary urban services, has maintained an adequate level of service and has worked to satisfy its residents' needj. Overall, Indian River County has maintained a pro -planning attitude. As a result, the county has followed the policies of the 1982 Plan. There have been only a limited number of amendments to the 1982 Plan, mostly minor changes that have served to strengthen the plan. With regard to land use, the amendments have served to reduce densities or to expand parts of the Commercial -Industrial Districts. The 1985 Act is much more specific than was the 1975 Act. By compelling governing bodies to demonstrate the economic feasibility of their comprehensive plans, the 1985 Act ensures that goals, objectives and policies of the 1990 Plan will be realistically and economically achievable. The 1990 Comprehensive Plan for Indian River County is not only more detailed than the 1982 plant it will also be easier to implement and evaluate. The Implementation Matrix for each element identifies the actions which must be taken, who is responsible for the action, the timeframe for the action and any funding required. The Evaluation Matrix shows the measure for each objective and the timeframe in achieving the objective. These matrices not only provide effective tools for the county to implement the plan, but they will make it easier for the county to conduct future evaluations. Indian River County has evaluated and appraised its 1982 plan and the Comprehensive Plan for 1990 will replace the 1982 plan upon state approval. 27