HomeMy WebLinkAbout10/16/2001 (2)ty. . 3. "Yr.: r'' `;
lee
t,. ,, a 2t sri.. ... . `h r. . ,... t , x.uh F. . .,
a i
i5a d . _ _ . , t a..1 fi xh. e Y ;_ J; . 5 $ . 5-... . ,rnx. > .n.. s .. is e .t, - t
4v s, 3 . _. , a, u '31`7. .s.: + k': .. f -:r. w-.. ,Y h. . ,. r rsem,S r'i..r. 'v ?.- r.
h fxelf,i+11 Ill
a
i i; 7 . .. ` a. : k's% M h ,f l' e tt . :,. k x
s'j`,+ k' fin.,° T x 4 +.3+
7 . ro•' i a r r e > t x 5 a 1- Y n 13 r 9r e'
tlit III
ell 11
MINUTES ATTACHED
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY ,FLORIDA
A G E N D A
TUESDAY, OCTOBER 16 , 2001 9 : 00 A . M .
ell
County Commission Chamber
County Administration Building
1840
25th Street , Vero Beach , Florida 32960
I let
COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
Caroline D . Ginn, Chairman District 5
ell Ruth M . Stanbridge , Vice Chairman District 2 James E . Chandler, County Administrator
Fran B . Adams District I Paul G . Bangel ,County Attorney
ell
Kenneth R . Macht District 3 Kimberly Massung, Executive Aide to BCC
ell
John W . Tippin District 4 Jeffrey K . Barton , Clerk to the Board
9 : 00 a . m . 1 . CALL TO ORDER BACKUP
PAGES
2 , INVOCATION
r
3 , PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Comm . John W . Tippin
NI
4 , ADDITIONS /DELETIONS TO THE AGENDA /
EMERGENCY ITEMS
ADDITION : 13 . A - Somerset County Response to our Letter
DEFERRED : 9 . A . L , Public Hearing on Local Law Enforcement Block Grant 2001 Program
To Friday , October 19 , 2001 at 2 pm .
5 . PROCLAMATION and PRESENTATION
A . Presentation of Proclamation Designating October 21 -27 ,
2001 as Character Counts ! Week in Indian River County 1
B . Presentation of Proclamation Designating the Week of
October 21 - 27 , 2001 Recreation Department of Vero
Beach/Indian River County Parents Pledge Week for
Character Counts ! 2
C . Presentation of Proclamation in Recognition of the Vero
eL Beach Art Club on its Sixty Fifty Anniversary 3
7`7,77777777e? ,7777777=77
M
I10IL: llr>s s n t°4 s r x i a a I It 1
r
19tera
ellC
4 .. ,. r, Ja a x _ k , a v .,a , < r4., t r
a.Ak z ve r s '' k;' d t;. a +, r. r A;^:. ry.
e„
a P . . ti:c. '.} i.• ea t +.. t :' Pyr t «• x r t „n z x et,
t.y, ;
r
F>_ i 1 h 'S
v<.m;
J n., rt 1' s r y "<5. 'u q k -t'
t • F
h,F,. .
a°: '-i^ d s`3 u .:.. c , r . 4 t3 - + .:. .yr r+c ,s c..x;r. . .::: ' e r f .tia,+. w s ,: :•
r r r slw a"+,, 3.r r,. _ :t t
eJ' 1 M1iW r i r K e . (4 l 5 Ev .. l i kR S rvrt ,4; 4
r
r
a
BACKUP
6 . APPROVAL OF MINUTES PAGES
None
7. CONSENT AGENDA
A. Received & Placed on File in Office of Clerk to the Board :
1 ) Indian River County Hospital District Notice of
new office location at First National Bank Bldg . , ,
3730 7th Terrace , Suite 204B , V . B . , FL 32960
2 ) Report of Convictions , September, 2001
B . Approval of Warrants
memorandum dated September 27 , 2001 ) 4 - 15
C . Approval of Warrants
memorandum dated October 5 , 2001 ) 16 - 25
D . Proclamation Designating Month of November, 2001
as National Epilepsy Awareness Month 26
E . Resignation of Nancy Diamond as the Sebastian
representative on Parks and Recreation Committee
letter dated October 1 , 2001 )27
F . Out of County Travel Authorization for Commissioners
to attend the Fla. State Association of Supervisors of
Elections Canvassing Board Workshop — February 28 ,
2002 , Orlando , FL 28 - 32
G . Payments to Vendors of Court Related Costs
memorandum dated September 28 , 2001 ) 33 - 34
th Place and
9th
H . 9Street Water Main Developer ' s
Agreement Amendment
memorandum dated October 3 , 2001 ) 35 - 49
I . Mary Gerardi Request for Release of Easement at
454 21 " Place S . E . (Vero Shores Subdivision)
memorandum dated September 28 , 2001 ) 50- 56
J . Bid Award : IRC #4017 Annual Bid for Sulfuric Acid
98 % Utilities Dept . )
memorandum dated September 25 , 2001 ) 57 - 70
B { 6
y
t f Y r''%
u ;,
a4:
rs`",.,'
sM. j}y'*z a'
t
a § z S>` J ., rc s..,
f 4 ,
x s
m 4"+
tr
F. Yt
rv'
St sY rch fizJ' iii" 5+r . a r z r r 3v
z
61
a ,'
n>ae "'.
wx,
g . .' v +... r.w .wt .k`: tt$, rs"'^- "_.. , . ss "{ 7, . .. , N. rr. . ».sa M/Pa .,1^ °4 .r'- p --'.a. . q:
7 . CONSENT AGENDA ( cont ' d . BACKUP
PAGES
K . Bid Award : IRC #4009 Annual Bid for Pest Control
Services Buildings and Grounds)
memorandum dated October 5 , 2001 ) 71 - 81
L . Bid Award : IRC #4008 Annual Bid for HydrofILI
silicic Acid Utilities Dept . )
memorandum dated October 5 , 200 1 ) 82 - 95
M .Bid Award : IRC #4019 Annual Bid for Liquid Aluminum
Sulfate Utilities Department)
memorandum dated October 1 , 200 1 ) 96 - 107
N . Bid Award : IRC #4010 Annual Bid for Asphalt Paving
and Resurfacing — (Public Works/Road & Bridge)
memorandum dated October 10 , 200 1 ) 108 - 143
O . Request for Floodplain Cut and Fill Balance Waiver
for Island View Residential Development
memorandum dated October 5 , 200 1 ) 144- 147
P . Request for Board to Grant Drainage Easements on the
Fischer- Sebastian River Conservation Area, to the Fischer
Lake Island Property Owner ' s Association , as Required for
State Cost- Share Reimbursement
memorandum dated October 10 , 2001 )148 - 157
8 , CONSTITUTIONAL OFFICERS and
GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES
None
9 , PUBLIC ITEMS
A. PUBLIC HEARINGS
1 . Sheriff' s Department — Public Hearing for Local
Law Enforcement Block Grant 2001 Program Year
memorandum dated September 5 , 200 1 ) 158 - 160
2 . AN ORDINANCE OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY ,
FLORIDA, AMENDING THE FUTURE LAND USE
ELEMENT OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN BY
CHANGING THE FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNA-
TION FOR ± 10 ACRES LOCATED ± 950 EAST OF
43RDAVENUE , ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF 41sT ST . ,
FROM M -2 MEDIUM - DENSITY RESIDENTIAL - 2
UP TO 10 UMTS /ACRE) , TO C/I , COMMERCIAL/
Public Hearing Item 9A2 continued on following page)
BI D 757
777 77
If
If
Ij
Ry
4
3 4 y
u
e
I .
S
s
r
CrI
r*,..
9 . PUBLIC ITEMS ( cont' d . ) :
BACKUP
A. PUBLIC HEARINGS (cont ' d . ) .
PAGES
2 . continued)
INDUSTRIAL ; AND PROVIDING SEVERABILITY
AND EFFECTIVE DATE
AN ORDINANCE OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY ,
FLORIDA, AMENDING THE ZONING ORDI-
NANCE AND THE ACCOMPANYING ZONING
MAP FROM RS - 6 , SINGLE-FAMILY
RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (UP TO 6 UNITS /
ACRE) , TO IL , LIGHT INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT,
FOR ± 10 ACRES LOCATED ± 950 EAST OF 43RD
AVENUE , ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF 41 ST STREET ,
AND DESCRIBED HEREIN, AND PROVIDING
FOR EFFECTIVE DATE
Thomas S . Hammond ' s Request to Amend the
Comprehensive Plan to Redesignate ± 10 Acres
from M- 2 to C/I and to Rezone those ± 10 acres
from RS - 6 to IL Legislative)
memorandum dated October 3 , 2001 ) 161 - 200
3 . AN ORDINANCE OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY,
FLORIDA, AMENDING THE FUTURE LAND USE
ELEMENT OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN BY
CHANGING THE FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNA-
TION FOR ± 15 . 46 ACRES LOCATED NEAR THE
SOUTHEAST CORNER OF US 1 AND 53RD STREET,
FROM M- 1 , MEDIUM -DENSITY RESIDENTIAL - 1
UP TO 8 UNITS /ACRE) , TO C/I, COMMERCIAL/
INDUSTRIAL ; AND BY CHANGING THE LAND
USE DESIGNATION FOR ± 16 . 79 ACRES LOCATED
1 , 550 FEET SOUTH OF 53RD STREET, ON THE
EAST SIDE OF US 1 , FROM CII TO M- 1 ; AND
PROVIDING SEVERABILITY AND EFFECTIVE
DATE
AN ORDINANCE OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY,
FLORIDA, AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE
AND THE ACCOMPANYING ZONING MAP FROM
RM - 6 , MULTIPLE - FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT
UP TO 6 UNITS/ACRE) , TO CG , GENERAL COM-
MERCIAL, DISTRICT, FOR ± 15 . 46 ACRES LOCATED
NEAR THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF US 1 AND
53RD STREET ; AND AMENDING THE ZONING
ORDINANCE AND THE ACCOMPANYING ZONING
MAP FROM CL , LIMITED COMMERCIAL DISTRICT ,
TO RM- 8 , MULTIPLE-FAMILY RESIDENTI_AL, DIS -
Public Hearing Item 9A3 continued on following page)
BKri
ti77
4
BACKUP
9 . PUBLIC ITEMS ( cont ' d) : PAGES
A. PUBLIC HEARINGS ( cont ' d j :
3 . continued)
TRICT (UP TO 8 UNITS /ACRE) , FOR ± 16 . 79 ACRES
LOCATED ± 1 , 550 FEET SOUTH OF 53RDSTREET ,
ON THE EAST SIDE OF US 1 , AND DESCRIBED
HEREIN, AND PROVIDING FOR EFFECTIVE DATE
J . Luther Groves , Inc . and Fairways at Grand Harbor
Ltd . , Request to Amend the Comprehensive Plan to
Redesignate ± 15 . 46 Acres from M- 1 to C/1 , and to
Rezone those ± 15 . 46 Acres from RM - 6 to CG ; and
to Amend the Comprehensive Plan to Redesignate
16 . 79 Acres from C /I to M- 1 and to Rezone those
16 . 79 Acres from CL to RM - 8 Legislative)
memorandum dated October 3 , 200 1 )201 - 242
4 . AN ORDINANCE OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY,
FLORIDA , AMENDING THE RECREATION AND
OPEN SPACE ELEMENT OF THE COMPREHEN-
SIVE PLAN REGARDING A CULTURAL
OBJECTIVE AND CULTURAL POLICIES ; AND
PROVIDING SEVERABILITY AND EFFECTIVE
DATE
County Initiated Request to Amend the Recrea-
tion and Open Space Element of the County ' s
Comprehensive Plan Legislative)
memorandum dated October 3 , 200 1 ) 243 - 267
5 . AN ORDINANCE OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY,
FLORIDA, AMENDING THE FUTURE LAND
USE ELEMENT OF THE COMPREHENSIVE
PLAN TO CREATE A NEW T . TRANSITIONAL
RESIDENTIAL (UP TO 1 UNIT/ACRE ; OR UP TO
3 UNITS/ACRE FR PLANNED DEVELOPMENT
PROJECTS ) , LAND USE DESIGNATION; AND
PROVIDING SEVERABILITY AND EFFECTIV
DATE
County Initiated Request to Amend the Text of
the Future Land Use Element of the County ' s
Comprehensive Plan to Create a T , Transitional
Residential, Land Use Designation (Legislative)
memorandum dated October 8 , 2001 ) 268 - 310
6 . AN ORDINANCE OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY ,
FLORIDA, AMENDING THE FUTURE LAND USE
ELEMENT BY EXPANDING THE URBAN SERVICE
AREA TO INCLUDE , AND CHANGING THE LAND
Public Hearing Item 9A6 continued following page)
i4
9 . PUBLIC ITEMS (cont ' d) :
BACKUP
A. PUBLIC HEARINGS (cont ' d. ) :
PAGES
6 . continued)
USE DESIGNATION FOR : 30 . 8 ACRES LOCATED
AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF 58TH AVENUE
AND THE MAIN CANAL ; 76 . 8 ACRES LOCATED
AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF 82NI'
AVENUE
AND 1ST STREET, S .W . ; AND 56 . 5 ACRES LOCATED
AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF 9TH STREET, S .
W . , AND 74TH AVENUE ; ALL FROM AG- 1 , AGRI-
CULTURAL - " (UP TO 1 UNIT/5 ACRES ) , TO T,
TRANSITIONAL RESIDENTIAL (UP TO 1 UNIT/
ACRE ; OR UP TO 3 UNITS/ACRE FOR PLANNED
DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS ) ; AND PROVIDING
CODIFICATION, SEVERABILITY, AND EFFECTIVE
DATE
County Initiated Request to Amend the Comprehen-
sive Plan to Redesignate 164 . 1 Acres from AGA to
T ; and to Expand the Urban Service Area to Include
Those 164 . 1 Acres Legislative)
memorandum dated October 3 , 2001 ) 311 - 350
B . PUBLIC DISCUSSION ITEMS
1 . Mr. & Mrs . Esposito Request to Speak Re : "Life
and Safety Issues / Privacy Gate — Riverpoint" 351 - 382
2 . Jill Geisz Request to Speak Re : " Gate / Wabasso
Beach"
no backup provided)
3 . Mr. Sinclair Request to Speak Re : "Noise at St.
Edwards Upper School and Lack of Response
from County Code Enforcement"
no backup provided)
4 . George Racicot Request to Speak Re : "Unsafe
Electrical Service — Lakewood Park"
no backup provided)
5 . Brian Heady Request to Speak Re : "non-responsive
government and actual cost to county taxpayers "
letter dated October 9 , 2001 ) 383
9 . PUBLIC ITEMS BACKUP
C . PUBLIC NOTICE ITEMS PAGES
Scheduled for Public Hearing on October 23 , 2001 :
1 . Three LDR amendment ordinances :
a . To update the affidavit of exemption regu -
lations to conform with recently approved
comprehensive plan policies that allow
use of the affidavit of exemption process ,
as well as the subdivision platting process ,
in agriculturally designated areas
Legislative)
b . To modify standards for sizes of landscape
material used to replace material on
established site planned project sites
Legislative)
C . To increase the threshold for staff- level
approvals for non-residential site plan
projects that propose permitted uses
Legislative)
2 . To consider a petition for the closing , abandon -
ment, and vacation of all of
15th Street S . W . within
Governor Estates Legislative)
memorandum dated October 5 , 2001 ) 384- 385
3 . Notice of Public Workshop Scheduled for
October 23 , 2001 :
Proposed Indian River County Redistricting 386
10 , COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ' S MATTERS
None
11 , DEPARTMENTAL MATTERS
A. Community Development
None
B . Emergency Services
1 . Approval of Renewal for a Class " C " Certificate
of Public Convenience and Necessity for Coastal
Health Services of Brevard , Inc . to Provide Inter-
Facility Neonatal Transfer Which Originate in
Indian River County
memorandum dated October 1 , 2001 ) 387 - 396
1
11 . DEPARTMENTAL MATTERS ( cont ' d. ) : BACKUP
Be Emergency Services ( cont ' d . ) : PAGES
2 . Approval of Renewal for a Class "E " Certificate
of Public Convenience and Necessity for Able
Transport , Inc . to Provide Wheelchair Services
memorandum dated October 1 , 2001 ) 397 -408
C . General Services
1 . Administration Building Chiller Maintenance
Contract
memorandum dated October 10 , 2001 ) 409 - 413
2 . Bid Award : IRC #4014 Sheriff' s Department
Evidence Storage Addition ( Gen . Services )
memorandum dated October 9 , 2001 ) 414-429
D . Leisure Services
None
E . Office of Management and Budget
None
F . Personnel
None
G . Public Works
None
H . Utilities
1 . Sebastian Water Assessment — Phase 3A
Approval of Pay Request Nos . 5 & 6 and
Change Order Nos . 3 & 4 , Bid No . 3025
memorandum dated September 24 , 2001 )430- 442
2 . Century 21 Developer ' s Agreement Final Pay
Request
memorandum dated October 4 , 200 1 ) 443 -448
I . Human Services
None
12 , COUNTY ATTORNEY
None
i P 7 6
BACKUP
13 . COMMISSIONERS ITEMS PAGES
A. Chairman Caroline D . Ginn
B . Vice Chairman Ruth M . Stanbridge
Updates
Co Commissioner Fran B . Adams
Legislative Delegation matters
no backup provided)
D . Commissioner Kenneth R. Macht
E . Commissioner John W . Tiepin
14 . SPECIAL DISTRICTS/BOARDS
A. Emergency Services District
None
B . Solid Waste Disposal District
1 . Approval of Minutes — Meeting of Sept . 4 , 2001
2 . Approval of Minutes — Meeting of Sept . 11 , 2001
3 . Indian River Correctional Institution ' s Request
for Solid Waste Assessment Adjustment
memorandum dated September 19 , 2001 ) 449 -453
Co Environmental Control Board
1 . Approval of Minutes — Meeting of 7/ 17/01
2 . Quarterly Report
memorandum dated October 9 , 200 1 ) 454-461
Bi l i S 0 10J
15 . ADJOURNMENT
Anyone who may wish to appeal any decision which may be made at this meeting will need to
ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made which includes the testimony and evidence
upon which the appeal will be based .
Anyone who needs a special accommodation for this meeting may contact the County ' s
Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Coordinator at 567 - 8000 x1223 at least 48 hours in advance of
meeting .
Indian River County WebSite : http : //bccl . co . indian-river . fl . us
Full agenda back- up material is available for review in the Board of County Commission Office ,
Indian River County Main Library , IRC Courthouse Law Library, and North County Library
Meeting may be broadcast live on AT & T Cable Channel 13 — rebroadcast continuously Thursday 1 : 00
p . m . until Friday morning and Saturday 12 : 00 noon until 5 : 00 p. m .
Meeting- broadcast same as above on AT & T Broadband, Channel 27 in Sebastian .
G 4 ; 6
INDEX TO MINUTES
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
MEETING OF OCTOBER 16 , 2001
1 . CALL TO ORDER . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
2 . INVOCATION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
3 . PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE I . . . . . . . I . . .1
4 . ADDITIONS /DELETIONS TO THE AGENDA/EMERGENCY ITEMS 2
5 . A . PROCLAMATION DESIGNATING OCTOBER 21 - 27 , 2001 AS CHARACTER
COUNTS ! WEEK IN INDIAN RIVER COUNTY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I 2
5 . 13 .PROCLAMATION DESIGNATING THE WEEK OF OCTOBER 21 - 27 , 2001
RECREATION DEPARTMENT OF VERO BEACH/INDIAN RIVER
COUNTY PARENTS PLEDGE WEEK FOR CHARACTER COUNTS ! 3
5 . C .PROCLAMATION IN RECOGNITION OF THE VERO BEACH ART CLUB
ON ITS SIXTY-FIFTH ANNIVERSARY 5
6 . A . APPROVAL OF MINUTES 6
7 , CONSENT AGENDA 6
7 . A . Reports . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .6
7 . B .Approval of Warrants 6
7 . C .Approval of Warrants I . I . . . . I . , . . . . . 16
7 . D .Proclamation Designating Month of November, 2001 as National Epilepsy
Awareness Month I . . . . . . . .I . . . . . . I . . . 24
7 . E . Resignation of Nancy Diamond as the Sebastian Representative on Parks
and Recreation Committee I . . I . . . I . . . . I . . . . . . . . I . . . . . 25
7 . F . Out - of- County Travel - Commissioners Attend Florida State Association of
Supervisors of Elections Canvassing Board Workshop - February 28 , 2002 ,
Orlando 26
7 . G . Payments to Vendors of Court Related Costs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27
1
s r,
e yp" .PzcYra kh z xzd+a-. gq c - x
y...7,77
a
l
rZ
TH . Margo Stanford Developer ' s Agreement Amendment - 9th Place and 9th 3rs? %
Street Water Main 29
7 . I . Resolution No . 2001 - 104 - Release of Easement at 454 21st Place SE . (Lot
7 , Block 8 , Vero Shores Subdivision , Unit 1 ) - Requested by Mary Gerardi
30
7 . J . Bid # 4017 - Annual Bid for Sulfuric Acid 98 % - Utilities Dept . - Kemiron ,
Inc . . . . . . . 34
7 . K . Bid # 4009 - Annual Bid for Pest Control Services - Buildings and Grounds
Division - Reject/Re- advertise 35
7 . L . Bid # 4008 - Annual Bid for Hydrofluosilicic Acid - Utilities Dept . - Allied
Universal Corporation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37
7 . M . Bid # 4019 - Annual Bid for Liquid Aluminum Sulfate - Utilities Dept . -
X
key iGeneralChemicalCorporation38
7 . N . Bid # 4010 - Annual Bid for Asphalt Paving and Resurfacing - Public
h ;iYWorks/Road & Bridge - Dickerson Florida, Inc . , Ranger Construction
Industries , Inc . and Community Asphalt Corp . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40 F
7 . 0 . Floodplain Cut and Fill Balance Waiver for Island View Residential
Development - Requested by Carter Associates , Inc . for Island View
Properties . . . . . 41
7 . P . Fischer- Sebastian River Conservation Area - Drainage Easements Granted
by Board to the Fischer Lake Island Property Owner ' s Association as LL
Required for State Cost- Share Reimbursement 43
9 . A . 1 . PUBLIC HEARING - LOCAL LAW ENFORCEMENT BLOCK GRANTr
LLEBG ) 2001 PROGRAM YEAR - REVIEW PROPOSED SPENDING PLAN
SHERIFF ' S OFFICE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 45
x
9 . A . 2 . PUBLIC HEARING - ORDINANCE NOS . 2001 - 024 AND 2001 - 025 -
THOMAS S . HAMMOND ' S REQUEST TO AMEND THE COMPREHENSIVE
PLAN TO REDESIGNATE 10 ACRES FROM M - 2 TO C /I AND TO
REZONE THOSE X10 ACRES FROM RS - 6 TO IL (Legislative) 45
4 .
Y Y(
9 . A . 3 . PUBLIC HEARING - ORDINANCE NOS . 2001 - 026 AND 2001 - 027 - J .
LUTHER GROVES , INC . AND FAIRWAYS AT GRAND HARBOR , LTD . ,
REQUEST TO AMEND THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TO REDESIGNATE
t
15 . 46 ACRES FROM M- 1 TO C /I , AND TO REZONE THOSE ± 15 . 46 ACRES
FROM RM- 6 TO CG ; AND TO AMEND THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TO
REDESIGNATE ± 16 . 79 ACRES FROM C /I TO M - 1 AND TO REZONE
THOSE X16 . 79 ACRES FROM CL TO RM - 8 (Legislative)63
a,
2
1 'i
D1i 19 Pw 1 0
Y
v
9 . A . 4 . PUBLIC HEARING - ORDINANCE NO . 2001 - 028 - COUNTY-INITIATED
REQUEST TO AMEND THE RECREATION AND OPEN SPACE ELEMENT
OF THE COUNTY ' S COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ( Legislative) . . . . . . . . . 1 . . 85
9 . A . 5 . PUBLIC HEARING - ORDINANCE NO . 2001 - 029 - COUNTY-INITIATED
REQUEST TO AMEND THE TEXT OF THE FUTURE LAND USE
ELEMENT OF THE COUNTY ' S COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TO CREATE A
T , TRANSITIONAL RESIDENTIAL , LAND USE DESIGNATION
Legislative) 94
9 . A . 6 . PUBLIC HEARING - ORDINANCE NO . 2001 - 030 - AMENDING THE
FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT BY EXPANDING THE URBAN SERVICE
AREA TO INCLUDE , AND CHANGING THE LAND USE DESIGNATION
FOR 30 . 8 ACRES FROM AG - 1 , AGRICULTURAL - 1 TO T . TRANSITIONAL
RESIDENTIAL , AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF 58TH AVENUE AND
THE MAIN CANAL (Legislative)
I . . I . . . . . 115
9 . 13 . 1 . PUBLIC DISCUSSION ITEM - REQUEST BY MR . AND MRS , ANTHONY
ESPOSITO TO SPEAK REGARDING "LIFE AND SAFETY
ISSUES /PRIVACY GATE - RIVERPOINT " . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 132
9 . 13 . 2 . PUBLIC DISCUSSION ITEM - REQUEST OF JILL GEISZ TO SPEAK
REGARDING " GATE/ WABASSO BEACH ' '135
9 . 13 . 3 . PUBLIC DISCUSSION ITEM - REQUEST OF MR . JIM SINCLAIR TO
SPEAK REGARDING "NOISE AT ST . EDWARDS UPPER SCHOOL AND
LACK OF RESPONSE FROM COUNTY CODE ENFORCEMENT " . . . . . . 137
9 . B . 4 . PUBLIC DISCUSSION ITEM - REQUEST OF GEORGE RACICOT TO
SPEAK REGARDING "UNSAFE ELECTRICAL SERVICES - LAKEWOOD
PARK " I . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 .1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 139
9 . 13 . 5 . PUBLIC DISCUSSION ITEM - REQUEST OF BRIAN HEADY TO SPEAK
REGARDING "NON - RESPONSIVE GOVERNMENT AND ACTUAL COST
TO COUNTY TAXPAYERS " 140
3
E1 1' 13 7 6 I
9 . C . 1 . - 3 . PUBLIC NOTICE ITEMS - FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS SCHEDULED
ON OCTOBER 23 , 2001
I . . . . . . . . . . . . . 141
1 . LDR AMENDMENT ORDINANCES . . . . . . I . . . . . . . . . . . . 141
a . To update the affidavit of exemption regulations to conform with
recently approved comprehensive plan policies that allow use of the
affidavit of exemption process , as well as the subdivision platting process ,
in agriculturally designated areas .Legislative ) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 142
b . To modify standards for sizes of landscape material used to replace
material on established site planned project sites .Legislative ) 142
C . To increase the threshold for staff- level approvals for non -
residential site plan projects that propose permitted uses (Legislative)
142
2 . TO CONSIDER A PETITION FOR THE CLOSING , ABANDONMENT ,
AND VACATION OF ALL OF 15TH STREET S . W . WITHIN
GROVENOR ESTATES (Legislative ) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
I . . . . 142
3 . PUBLIC WORKSHOP ON PROPOSED INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
REDISTRICTING - OCTOBER 23 , 2001 143
11 . B . 1 . RENEWAL OF CLASS " C " CERTIFICATE OF PUBLIC
CONVENIENCE AND NECESSITY FOR COASTAL HEALTH
SERVICES OF BREVARD , INC . TO PROVIDE INTER-FACILITY
NEONATAL TRANSFER WHICH ORIGINATE IN INDIAN RIVER
COUNTY I . . . . . . . . . I . . . . . . . . . .144
11 . B . 2 . RENEWAL OF CLASS "E " CERTIFICATE OF PUBLIC
CONVENIENCE AND NECESSITY FOR ABLE TRANSPORT, INC .
TO PROVIDE WHEELCHAIR SERVICES 145
1 l . C . 1 . ADMINISTRATION BUILDING - ONE - YEAR EXTENSION OF
CHILLER MAINTENANCE CONTRACT - JOHNSON CONTROLS 146
1 LC . 2 . BID # 4014 - SHERIFF ' S DEPARTMENT EVIDENCE STORAGE
ADDITION - CHILBERG CONSTRUCTION COMPANY , INC . 147
11 . H . 1 . SEBASTIAN WATER ASSESSMENT - PHASE 3A - TRI - SURE
CORPORATION - PAY REQUEST NOS . 5 & 6 (FINAL ) AND
CHANGE ORDER NOS . 3 & 41 BID # 3025 1 . . . . . . . . I . . . I . . 149
1 LH . 2 . CENTURY 21 DEVELOPER ' S AGREEMENT FINAL PAY REQUEST -
HAN SHAN ENTERPRISES , INC . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 150
4
8
13 . A . CHAIRMAN GINN - RESPONSE FROM SOMERSET COUNTY ON
RESOLUTION CONCERNING TERRORIST ACTS ON SEPTEMBER
1152001 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I . . . .152
13 . B . VICE CHAIRMAN STANBRIDGE - RES . NO . 2001 - 105 -
REQUESTING LEGISLATIVE DELEGATION SUPPORT AMTRAK
PASSENGER RAIL SERVICE UPDATES I . . . . . I . . . . . . . . . . . 152
13 . C . 1 . COMMISSIONER ADAMS - MARINE RESOURCES COUNCIL
RECOGNITION OF VICE CHAIRMAN STANBRIDGE . . . . . . . . . . 154
13 . C . 2 . COMMISSIONER ADAMS - LEGISLATIVE DELEGATION
MATTERS I . . . . . . . . . . . .154
DOCUMENTS PLACED ON FILE - FACILITY LEASE AGREEMENT WITH
DODGERS FOR DODGERTOWN
I . . . I . . . I . . . . . . 155
14 . A . EMERGENCY SERVICES DISTRICT . . . . . I . . . . . . . . . . . . 155
14 . 13 .SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL DISTRICT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .155
14 . C . ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL BOARD . I . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .155
REMINDERS 155
5
r } 7l
October 16 , 2001
The Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County , Florida, met in Regular
Session at the County Commission Chambers , 1840 25 `" Street, Vero Beach , Florida, on
Tuesday , October 16 , 2001 . Present were Caroline D . Ginn , Chairman ; Ruth Stanbridge ,
Vice Chairman , Kenneth R . Macht ( left the meeting at 11 : 00 a . m . ) ;and John W . Tippin .
Commissioner Fran B . Adams arrived at 9 : 27 a . m .Also present were James E . Chandler,
County Administrator ; Paul G . Bangel , County Attorney ; and Patricia Ridgely , Deputy
Cleric .
1 . CALL TO ORDER
The Chairman called the meeting to order at 9 : 00 a . m . She announced that
Commissioner Adams was on her way .
I INVOCATION
Chairman Ginn delivered the invocation .
I PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Commissioner Tippin led the Pledge to the Flag .
October 16 , 2001
1
c; ( P 70
4 . ADDITIONS /DELETIONS TO THE AGENDA/EMERGENCY
ITEMS
Chairman Ginn announced that Item 9 . A . I . ,Public Hearing for Local Law
Enforcement Block Grant 2001 Program Year , was deferred to a Special Meeting on Friday ,
October 19 , 2001 . She also requested the addition of Item 13 . A . , Somerset County ' s
response to our letter .
ON MOTION by Vice Chairman Stanbridge, SECONDED BY
Commissioner Macht , the Board unanimously 4 - 0 ,
Commissioner Adams absent) made the above changes to the
agenda .
5 . A . PROCLAMATION DESIGNATING OCTOBER 21 -27 ,2001 AS
CHARACTER COUNTS ! WEEK IN INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
Chairman Ginn read the proclamation and presented it to Rob Slezak, Programs
Manager for the Recreation Department and a Board member for Character Counts ! , who
accepted it with thanks from the Substance Abuse Council and Character Counts ! and
recognized the staunch support of the late Rev . William Nigh .
PROCLAMATION
DESIGNATING
OCTOBER 21 - 27 , 2001
CHARACTER COUNTS ! WEEK
IN INDIAN RIVER COUNTY , FLORIDA
WHEREAS , there is a great concern for moral values in our nation today , and the
young people are our most precious resource and hope for the future ; and
October 16 , 2001
2
B er 71
WHEREAS , it is the duty of all adults to set a good example for our youth to
follow , and to strengthen the character of our young people in whatever way we can ,thereby safeguarding the future ; and
WHEREAS , a program called " CHARACTER COUNTS ! " was adopted and
introduced into our schools , which emphasizes six Pillars of Character"
trustworthiness , respect , responsibility , fairness , caring and citizenship ; and
WHEREAS , character education should be taught in the home by parents , as
well as in our schools , but should be reinforced by the business community , religious
organizations and civic groups , and
WHEREAS , the Character Counts ! Coalition of Indian River County is a
program of the Substance Abuse Council , and will be celebrating National CharacterCounts ! Week during October 21 - 27 , 2001 . They will be emphasizing the six " PillarsofCharacter" county wide with planned daily events :
NOW , THEREFORE , BE IT PROCLAIMED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA that the week of October
21 - 27 , 2001 be designated as
CHARACTER COUNTS ! WEEK
in Indian River County , and the Board requests all our citizens to participate in the
planned activities and support our young peopie to help them develop good character
and become upstanding , productive individuals in our society .
Adopted this 16th day of October , 2001 ,
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
Caroline D . Ginn , Chairman
Nq VV
5 . B . PROCLAMATION DESIGNATING THE WEEK OF OCTOBER 21 -
274 2001 RECREATION DEPARTMENT OF VERO BEACH/INDIAN
RIVER COUNTY PARENTS PLEDGE WEEK FOR CHARACTER
COUNTS !
Chairman Ginn read the proclamation and presented it to Rob Slezak (as 5 . A . above)
who accepted with thanks and advised that the Parents Pledging will take place next week,
October 16 , 2001
3
72
a copy of which was handed to the Commissioners (copy in Clerk ' s backup file ) . There will
be special awards and banners at the Halloween Parades in Vero Beach and Sebastian on
Saturday , October 27 ; 2001 .
PROCLAMATION
DESIGNATING THE WEEK OF
OCTOBER 21 -27, 2001
RECREATION DEPARTMENT OF VERO BEACH/INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
PARENTS PLEDGE WEEK
FOR CHARACTER COUNTS !
WHEREAS , Character Counts ! is a nationwide initiative to strengthen the
character of our next generation ; and
WHEREAS , good character is based on six positive values :Trustworthiness ,
Respect, Responsibility , Fairness , Caring and Citizenship ; and
WHEREAS , the Recreation Department of Vero Beach/Indian River County
actively displays and supports the six pillars of character and is a positive influence in
developing character in our young people ; and
WHEREAS , in partnership with the Recreation Department, Character Counts !
and individual citizens , a County-wide Parents Pledge is taking place to reemphasize
the importance of our shared values and help to expand character development
activities ;
NOW, THEREFORE , BE IT PROCLAIMED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA that the week of October
21 -27 , 2001 be designated as
RECREATION DEPARTMENT
PARENTS PLEDGE WEEK
FOR CHARACTER COUNTS !
in Indian River County , and the Board requests all parents to sign the pledge in support
of our youth to help reinforce the importance of good character.
Adopted this 16th day of October, 2001 .
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY , FLORIDA
Lai n .
Ruth M . Stanbridge , Vice Ch rman
0
October 16 , 2001
4
5 . C . PROCLAMATION IN RECOGNITION OF THE VERO BEACH
ART CLUB ON ITS SIXTY- FIFTH ANNIVERSARY
Chairman Ginn read the proclamation and presented it to Mrs . Jean Nagy who
accepted it with thanks and who was very excited about their October 20 " celebration which
will be attended by three of the founding members .
PROCLAMATION
IN RECOGNITION OF THE VERO BEACH ART CLUB
ON ITS SIXTY FIFTH ANNIVERSARY
WHEREAS , on November 20 , 1936 , five people interested in drawing and painting
met for the first time to form a group called the Vero Beach Sketch Club , meeting each Monday
evening during the winter months to work and discuss all aspects of art . Their first exhibition ,
held in 1937 , featured works by artists from Fort Pierce to Sebastian ; and
WHEREAS , by-laws were drafted in 1941 , and the group renamed itself the Vero
Beach Art Club in 1954 .During its formative years , the Club maintained studios in various
locations in downtown Vero Beach and established an annual Members ' Art Show . They also
presented monthly lecture/demonstrations which were always open to the public ; and
WHEREAS , the first outdoor art show was established in 1972 , and became an
instant success . Presented in the springtime of each year since that time , it has gained national
recognition as the "Under the Oaks " Outdoor Art Show ; and
WHEREAS , by 1975 the Club began negotiations with the City of Vero Beach to
obtain a site in the Civic Arts Center complex for the purpose of building an Art Academy and
Gallery , and was granted an option on a site . Gallery by-laws were drafted in 1977 , and the
Club established its first Art School in a space rented at 1965 14 `h Avenue ; and
WHEREAS , in 1978 the Vero Beach Art Club began a cooperative relationship with
the Alliance for the Arts in an attempt to further the building of an art-centered facility .An
agreement between the two organizations and the City of Vero Beach was reached and
finalized in 1981 , and the present Center for the Arts is the result of this union .
NOW, THEREFORE , BE IT PROCLAIMED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS , INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA that the Board congratulates the Vero
Beach Art Club on its Sixty Fifth Anniversary
Adopted this 16th day of October, 2001 .
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
Caroline D . Ginn , Chair n
October 16 , 2001
5
6 . A . APPROVAL OF MINUTES
None .
7 . CONSENT AGENDA
7. A . Re orts
1 ) Indian River County Hospital District Notice of new office location at First
National Bank Bldg . , 3730 7 " Terrace , Suite 204B , Vero Beach , FL 32960
2 ) Report of Convictions , September 2001
7. 8. Approval of Warrants
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of September 27 , 2001 :
To : HONORABLE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
DATE : SEPTEMBER 2712001
SUBJECT : APPROVAL OF WARRANTS
FROM : EDWIN M. FRY, JR. , FINANCE DIRECTOR
In compliance with Chapter 136 . 06, Florida Statutes , all warrants issued by the
Board of County Commissioners are to be recorded in the Board minutes .
Approval is requested for the attached list of warrants , issued by the Clerk to
the Board , for the time period of September 21 , 2001 to September 27 , 2001 .
ON MOTION by Commissioner Macht, SECONDED BY Vice
Chairman Stanbridge , the Board unanimously 4 - 0 ,
Commissioner Adams absent) approved the list of warrants
issued by the Clerk to the Board for the period September 21 -
27 , 2001 , as requested .
October 16 , 2001
6
CHECK NAME CHECK CHECK
NUMBER DATE AMOUNT
0021373 BLUE CROSS / BLUE SHIELD OF 2001 - 09 - 25 19 , 296 . 140021374ALDENRISKMANAGEMENT2001 - 09 - 25 9 , 669 . 300021375UNIPSYCHBENEFITSOFFL , INC 2001 - 09 - 25 2 , 084 . 400021376IRCEMPLOYEEHEALTHINSURAINCE -2001 - 09 - 25 122 , 459 . 660021377KRUCZKIEWICZ , LORIANE 2001 - 09 - 26 138 . 500021378BUREAUFORCHILDSUPPORTENFOR2001 - 09 - 26 115 . 380021379WISCTF2001 - 09 - 26 75 . 000021380INDIANRIVERCOUNTYBOARDOF2001 - 09 - 26 176 . 000021381INTERNALREVENUESERVICE2001 - 09 - 26 50 . 00
0021382 IRS - ACS 2001 - 09 - 26 50 . 000021383CHAPTER13TRUSTEE2001 - 09 - 26 664 . 73
0021384 VERO BEACH FIREFIGHTERS ASSOC . 2001 - 09 - 26 2 , 540 . 00
0021385 INDIAN RIVER FEDERAL CREDIT 2001 - 09 - 26 82 , 037 . 15
0021386 COLONIAL LIFE & ACCIDENT 2001 - 09 - 26 213 . 830021387NACO / SOUTHEAST 2001 - 09 - 26 81271 . 26
0021388 SALEM TRUST COMPANY 2001 - 09 - 26 285 . 86
0021389 SAN DIEGO COUNTY OFFICE OF THE 2001 - 09 - 26 132 . 460021390FLSOU2001 - 09 - 26 8 , 592 . 80
0292804 FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF 2000 - 11 - 16 00 VOID0303870MITCHELLTRAINING , INC 2001 - 06 - 07 00 VOID0304575CORVELCORPORATION2001 - 06 - 21 00 VOID0305714BOBCATOFORLANDO2001 - 07 - 12 00 VOID0307420BRANIGANEDWARD2001 - 08 - 09 00 VOID0307856EMERGENCYMEDICALCONSULTANTS2001 - 08 - 16 00 VOID0308382SHERATONSANDKEYRESORT2001 - 08 - 23 00 VOID0309162RELIABLETRANSMISSIONSERVICE2001 - 09 - 06 00 VOID0309188SENICAL , TERRY 2001 - 09 - 06 00 VOID0309407DOUBLETREEHOTEL2001 - 09 - 13 00 VOID0309519LANCY , OLIVEANN , PA 2001 - 09 - 13 00 VOID0310034VEROCOLLISIONCENTER2001 - 09 - 20 00 VOID0310052AAFIREEQUIPMENT ,INC 2001 - 09 - 27 1 , 151 . 250310053ACEPLUMBING , INC 2001 - 09 - 27 64 . 070310054ADVANCEDGARAGEDOORS ,INC 2001 - 09 - 27 185 . 600310055ALPHAACEHARDWARE2001 - 09 - 27 23 . 05
0310056 ACTION ANSWERING SERVICE 2001 - 09 - 27 386 . 80C310057APPLEMACHINE & SUPPLY CO 2001 - 09 - 27 709 , 97
0310058 AUTO SUPPLY CO OF VERO BEACH , 2001 - 09 - 27 637 . 580310059ABSPUMPS ,INC 2001 - 09 - 27 5 , 765 . 860310060ALLFLORIDACOFFEE & BOTTLED 2001 - 09 - 27 29 . 950310061ADAM ' S MARK HOTEL 2001 - 09 - 27 158 . 000310062AT & T WIRELESS SERVICES 2001 - 09 - 27 32 . 210310063AT & T 2001 - 09 - 27 30 . 780310064AMERIGAS2001 - 09 - 27 60 . 000310065AMERICANLIBRARYASSOC2001 - 09 - 27 50 . 200310066ATLANTICCOASTALTITLECORP2001 - 09 - 27 372 . 000310067ALLCOUNTYMOWER & EQU.IP CO 2001 - 09 - 27 168 . 290310068AQUATECHNIQUESINCORPORATED2001 - C9 - 27
0310069 AUTO PARTS OF VERO ,INC
605 . 00
2001 - 09 - 27 1 , 646 . 760310070AMERICANREPORTING2001 - 09 - 27
0310071 ALAN DALE WILLIAMS TRACTOR 2001 - 09 - 27
27 00
0310072 A T & T
500 . 00
2001 - 09 - 27 32 . 520310073AIAFLORIDA2001 - 09 - 27
0310074 A M ENGINEERING & TESTING INC 2001 - 09 - 27
910 . 00
960 . 000310075ACTIONWELDINGSUPPLYINC2001 - 09 - 27 57 . 500310076AHEADHEADGEARINC2001 - 09 - 27 578 . 220310077ALLIEDTRAILERSALES & RENTALS 2001 - 09 - 27 150 . 000310078ANGLE , JEAN H 2001 - 09 - 27 50 . 610310079AGUSTIN , AGUSTAVE 2001 - 09 - 27 2 , 099 . 000310080BAIRD , JOSEPH A 2001 - 09 - 27 86 . 760310081BARTHCONSTRUCTION2001 - 09 - 27 24 , 000 . 00
October 16 , 2001
7
Dl( 7
CHECK NAME
NUMBER CHECK
CHECK
DATE
0310082 AMOUNT
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS 2001 - 09 _ 270310083BARTON , JEFFREY K - CLERK0310084BRIDGESTONESPORTS , 2001 - 09 - 27 5 . 294 . 57
0310085 BARTON ,
INC
2001 - 09 - 27 5 , 388 . 00
0310086 JEFFREY K 178 . 56BRADSMITHASSOCIATES2001 - 09 - 27
0310087 BAKER INC 2001 - 09 - 27
6 . 687 .
2
TAYLOR INC 11 , 970 . 820310088BRODARTCO2001 - 09 _ 27
0310089 BESANCON , 2001 - 09 - 27 1 . 792 - 63
0310090 CAROL 2 , 585 . 52BOYNTONPUMP & IRRIGATION 2001 - 09 - 27
0310091 BURNETT 2001 - 09 - 27 17 . 60
0310092 EDWIN 1 , 283 . 03BOOKSONTAPEINC2001 - 09 - 27
0310093 BAKER & 2001 - 09 - 27 280 . 66
0310094 TAYLOR ENTERTAINMENT 2001 - 09 _ 27
3C . 00
TAYLOR
0310095 BEAZER HOMES ,2001 - 09 - 27 311 . 70
0310096 INC 2 , 650 . 60BELLSOUTHPUBLICCOMMUNICATION2001 - 09 - 27
2001 - 09 - 27 500 . 000310097
DILLARD DEPARTMENT STORES0310098BEIDLER , INC 2001 - 09 - 27 275 . 55
0310099 HENRY
38 . 62HANGEL , PAUL G 2001 - 09 - 27
0310100 BENNETT 2001 - 09 - 27 414 . 13
0310101 EVELYN
87 . 84BRENNTAG - MID SOUTH INC
2001 - 09 - 27
0310102 BURTON GOLF INC 2001 - 09 - 27 51 . 89
0310103 BELLSOUTH 2001 - 09 - 27 1 . 047 . 32
0310104 CAMERON & 2001 - 09 - 27 476 . 08
0310105 BARKLEY COMPANY 222 . 77CAMP , DRESSER & MCKEE , INC
2001 - 09 - 27
0310106 CATAPHOTE INC 2001 - 09 _ 27 66 . 23
0310107 CHANDLER EQUIPMENT 2001 - 09 - 27 54700 . 46
0310108 Q ZFMENT CO , INC 2001 - 2 . 700 . 00CITRUSMOTEL09 - 27
0310109 CLEMENTS PEST CONTROL
2001 - 09 - 27
23 . 94
0310110 COASTAL GRAPHICS 09 - 272001 - 180 . 00
0310111 COMMUNICATIONS INT ' L INC
2001 - 09 - 27 21 . 00
0310112 CHEMSEARCH 2001 - 09 - 27
180 . 76
0310113 COX GIFFORD FUNERAL HOME
2001 - 09 - 27
89 . 25
0310114 CATHOLIC CHARITIES 2001 - 09 - 27 187 . 58
0310115 CUSTOM CARRIAGES , 2001 - 300 . 00
INC 09 - 270310116CHIVERSNORTHAMERICA2001 - 09 - 27 11662 . 06
0310117 CLIFF BERRY , INC 2001 - 09 - 27 15 . 76
CINDY ' S 2001 - 09 - 27 64 . 60310118
PET CENTER ,INC0310119CENTERFOREMOTIONALAND
2001 - 09 - 27 75 . 00
0310120 COLUMBIA HOUSE 2001 - 09 _ 27 25 . 82
0310121 CULTURAL COUNCIL OF
2001 - 09 _ 27 570 . 00
INDIAN0310122CLEVELAND 2001 - 109 . 85GOLFCO .09 - 2i
27 , 584 . 340310123CARQUESTAUTOPARTS
INC
2001 - 09 - 270310124COLUMBIAPROPANE2001 - 09 - 27 351 . 75
0310125 LINGULAR WI 2001 - 09 - 27 205 . 38
0310126 WIRELESS 665 . 10CLARRY , ALISON 2001 - 09 _ 270310127CREATIVETHERAP2001 - 09 - 27 627 . 47
0310128 Y STORE 21 . 88CENTRALLOCATINGSERVICE2001 - 09 _ 27
0310129 CARLS ' ROSE
LTD 2001 - 09 - 27
69 . 25
0310130 DAVESGOODSSPORTING 2001 - 09 - 27 630 . 40
0310131 DODGE , HENRY W 2001 - 09 _ 27 51 . 89
0310132 FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF
2001 - 09 - 27 97 . 30
0310133 DEPENDABLE DODGE 2001 - 09 - 27 50 . 28
0310134 DAVIDSON TITLES , /
INC
2001 - 09 - 27
2 ' 479 - 07
0310135 DATA FLOW
INC
2001 - 09 _ 27
65 . 78
0310136 SYSTEMS , INC 1 , 001 . 34DIEHL , MELANIE 2001 - 09 - 27
73 - 850310137DOWNTOWNPRODUCEINC
2001 - 09 - 27
8 '
09 . 310310138DILLARD , 2001 - 09 - 27 19 . 31
0310139 CABBIE
75 . 20DOUBLETREEOCEAN2001 - 09 _ 27FRONTHOTEL2001 - 09 - 27 38 . 62
360 . 00
October 16 , 2001
8
i i 77
CHECK NAME CHECK CHECK
NUMBER DATE AMOUNT
0310140 E - Z BREW COFFEE SERVICE ,INC 2001 - 09 - 27
0310141 EDWARD DON & COMPANY
457 . 00
2001 - 09 - 27 21027 . 610310142EDLUND & DRITENBAS 2001 - 09 - 27
0310143 EMERGENCY MEDICAL CONSULTANTS 2001 - 09 - 27
2 , 843 . 31
0310144 ELLIOT , JOY M
65 . 00
2001 - 09 - 27 52 . 540310145EXPERTSHUTTERSERVICESINC2001 - 09 - 27
0310146 FEDEX 1 , 400 . 00
2001 - 09 - 27 97 . 400310147FISHERSCIENTIFIC2001 - 09 - 27
0310148 FLORIDA EAST COAST RAILWAY LLC 2001 - 09 - 27
96 . 010 . 0000310149FLORIDACOCA - COLA BOTTLING CO 2001 - 09 - 27 176 . 250310150FLORIDAENGINEERINGSOCIETY2001 - 09 - 27 11308 . 000310151FLORIDAPOWER & LIGHT COMPANY 2001 - 09 - 27
0310152 FLOWERS BA-KING COMPANY OF 2001 - 09 - 27
16 , 117 . 68
A
0310153 FLORIDA TIRE RECYCLING , INC 2001 - 09 - 27
73 . 67
0310154 FLORIDAFFINITY , INC
1 , 791 . 09
2001 - 09 - 27 15 , 904 . 490310155FLORIDAHOSPITAL2001 - 09 - 27
0310156 FELLSMERE POLICE DEPARTMENT 2001 - 09 - 27
3 , 601 . 12
0310157 FLORIDA ANIMAL LEAGUE
25 . 00
2001 - 09 - 27 125 . 000310158FLORIDADEPARTMENTOF2001 - 09 - 27
0310159 F & W PUBLICATIONS INC
300 . 00
2001 - 09 - 27 17 . 210310160FIRESTONETIRE & SERVICE 2001 - 09 - 27 1 , 451 . 350310161FRENCH , GEORGE 2001 - 09 - 27 110 . 000310162rFS / AWWA 2001 CONFERENCE 2001 - 09 - 27 120 . 000310163FITCH , INC 2001 - 09 - 27 12 , 000 . 000310164GALEGROUP , THE 2001 - 09 - 27 871 . 190310165GAYLORDBROTHERS , INC 2001 - 09 - 27 79 . 740310166GENERALGMC , TRUCK 2001 - 09 - 27
0310167 GOO KNIGHT LAWN EQUIPMENT ,INC 2001 - 09 - 27
1 , 441 . 60
0310168 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO INC
90 . 74
2001 - 09 - 27 914 . 340310169GATEWAYLEARNINGCORP2001 - 09 - 27 199 . 950310170GEOSYNTECCONSULTANTS2001 - 09 - 27 48 , 424 . 460310171GRAPHXPRINTING2001 - 09 - 27 319 . 000310172GORHAM , JONATHAN 2001 - 09 - 27 540 . 650310173GENTGEN , JOAN O 2001 - 09 - 27 116 . 250310174GRANDHARBORGOLF & BEACH CLUB 2001 - 09 - 27 500 . 000310175GILL , SOPHIA 2001 - 09 - 27 200 . 000310176EBS ,INC 2001 - 09 - 27 525 . 230310177HELENACHEMICALCO2001 - 09 - 27 868 . 050310178HYATTREGENCYMIAMI2001 - 09 - 27 278 . 000310179HERITAGEBOOKS , INC 2001 - 09 - 27 224 . 800310180HELD , PATRICIA BARGO 2001 - 09 - 27 220 . 500310181HOLIDAYINNRIVERWALK2001 - 09 - 27 118 . 000310182HIBISCUSCHILDREN ' S CENTER 2001 - 09 - 27 2 , 083 . 330310183HILLMANUFACTURING2001 - 09 - 27 717 . 360310184HORIZONNURSERY2001 - 09 - 27 250 . 000310185HARTSFIELD , CELESTE L 2001 - 09 - 27 70 . 000310186HOMETOWNPETCARECENTER2001 - 09 - 27 26 . 000310187HARRIS , GREGORY PHD CVE 2001 - 09 - 27 1 , 907 . 650310188HOPECOMPANY , THE 2001 - 09 - 27
0310189 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY SOLID 2001 - 09 - 27
1 , 969 . 10
0310190 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY 2001 - 09 - 27
1 , 010 . 79
0310191 INDIAN RIVER BATTERY , INC 2001 - 09 - 27
400 . 00
589 . 35
2
0310192 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY 2001 - 09 - 27 1586 . 500310193INDIANRIVERCOUNTYUTILITY2001 - 09 - 27 37 . 150310194INDIANRIVERMEMORIALHOSPITAL2001 - 09 - 27 8 , 858 . 260310195INGRAMLIBRARYSERVICES2001 - 09 - 27 130 . 880310196INDIANRIVERALL - FAB , INC 2001 - 09 - 27 127 . 68
October 16 , 2001
9
CHECK NAME CHECK CHECK
NUMBER DATE AMOUNT
0310197 ISCO ,INC 2001 - 09 - 27 241 . 57
0310198 IKON OFFICE SOLUTIONS 2001 - 09 - 27 917 . 60
0310199 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY SHERIFF ' S 2001 - 09 - 27 14 , 199 . 76
0310200 IRROMETER COMPANY , INC . 2001 - 09 - 27 154 . 06
0310201 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY SHERIFF ' S 2001 - 09 - 27 30 . 00
0310202 IRRIGATION CONSULTANTS UNLIMIT 2001 - 09 - 27 98 . 41
0310203 JORDAN , ELIZABETH M 2001 - 09 - 27 85 . 19
0310204 JANITORIAL DEPOT OF AMERICA 2001 - 09 - 27 1 , 134 . 29
0310205 JOHNSON CONTROLS INC 2001 - 09 - 27 650 . 00
0310206 JOHNSON , MICHELLE L 2UU1 - 09 - 27 48 . 00
0310207 JEFFERSON , CHRISTOPHER A 2001 - 09 - 27 25 . 75
0310208 JLT INSURANCE SERVICES 2001 - 09 - 27 420 . 00
0310209 JONES , ELVIN JR 2001 - 09 - 27 74 . 67
0310210 KELLY TRACTOR CO 2001 - 09 - 27 1 , 155 . 51
0310211 KOUNS , DARLENE 2001 - 09 - 27 100 . 42
0310212 KEEP INDIAN RIVER BEAUTIFUL 2001 - 09 - 27 11900 . 00
0310213 KAI CUSTOM GLOVES 2001 - 09 - 27 962 . 59
0310214 LENGEMANN OF FLORIDA , INC 2001 - 09 - 27 39 . 60
0310215 LESCO , INC 2001 - 09 - 27 22 . 60
0310216 LAPSCO INC 2001 - 09 - 27 269 . 00
0310217 LUNA , JORGE 2001 - 09 - 27 238 . 00
0310218 LUNA , JUVENAL 2001 - 09 - 27 308 . 00
0310219 LEGENDARY CONSTRUCTION 2001 - 09 - 27 11000 . 00
0310220 LANCY , OLIVEANN , PA 2001 - 09 - 27 335 . 00
0310221 LIOTO , DOMINICK 2001 - 09 - 27 281 . 00
0310222 MASSUNG , KIMBERLY E 2001 - 09 - 27 49 . 14
0310223 MCCORKLE RADIOLOGY 2001 - 09 - 27 12 . 00
0310224 MCGRAW- HILL COMPANIES 2001 - 09 - 27 52 . 32
0310225 MIKES GARAGE 2001 - 09 - 27 85 . 00
0310226 MUMFORD LIBRARY BOOKS ,INC 2001 - 09 - 27 130 . 59
0310227 MUNICIPAL EQUIPMENT CO 2001 - 09 - 27 96 . 00
0310228 MARTIN ' S LAMAR UNIFORMS 2001 - 09 - 27 181 . 36
0310229 MATTHEW BENDER & CO , INC 2001 - 09 - 27 359 . 23
0310230 MADD 2001 - 09 - 27 50 . 00
0310231 METAL CULVERTS 2001 - 09 - 27 31166 . 00
0310232 MATTINGLY , JOSEPH B 2001 - 09 - 27 33 . 75
0310233 MIDWEST TAPE EXCHANGE 2001 - 09 - 27 119 . 90
0310234 MARC INDUSTRIES 2001 - 09 - 27 203 . 10
0310235 MEDCHECK 2001 - 09 - 27 271 . 37
0310236 MEZZINA , PATRICIA 2001 - 09 - 27 479 . 00
0310237 METTLER - TOLEDO FLORIDA , INC 2001 - 09 - 27 31000 . 00
0310238 MORTON SALT 2001 - 09 - 27 11245 . 52
0310239 MARTIN LUTHER KING JR 2001 - 09 - 27 21105 . 99
0310240 MUNNINGS , WANDA 2001 - 09 - 27 110 . 00
0310241 M & N INTERNATIONAL 2001 - 09 - 27 83 . 41
0310242 MASCOT PRESS 2001 - 09 - 27 39 . 38
0310243 MCDONALD , LARRY 2001 - 09 - 27 500 . 00
0310244 NORTH SOUTH SUPPLY INC 2001 - 09 - 27 7 . 13
0310245 NOTARY PUBLIC UNDERWRITER ,INC 2001 - 09 - 27 44 . 00
0310246 NICOSIA , ROGER J DO 2001 - 09 - 27 31460 . 00
0310247 NICE GUY BAIL BONDS 2001 - 09 - 27 21403 . 85
0310248 NAN MCKAY & ASSOCIATES ,INC 2001 - 09 - 27 214 . 00
0310249 NEW HORIZONS OF THE TREASURE 2001 - 09 - 27 3 , 781 . 92
0310250 NATIONAL GEOGRAPHIC VIDEO 2001 - 09 - 27 23 . 70
0310251 NCR CORPORATION 2001 - 09 - 27 11163 . 77
October 16 , 2001
10
3 7
CHECK NAME CHECK
NUMBER CHECK
DATE AMOUNT
0310252 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS 2001 - 09 - 27 504 . 430310253NORTHERNSAFETYCOMPANY2001 - 09 - 27 125 . 660310254NATIONALASSOCIATIONOF2001 - 09 - 27 109 . 940310255NECBUSINESSNETWORKSOLUTIONS2001 - 09 - 27 219 . 000310256NATIONSRENT2001 - 09 - 27 67 . 530310257NIKEGOLF2001 - 09 - 27 1 , 039 . 560310258NOWLIN , TIAIRA 2001 - 09 - 27 19 . 310310259NAPIER , ROBERT L III 2001 - 09 - 27 19 . 120310260OFFICEPRODUCTS & SERVICE 2001 - 09 - 27 1 , 013 . 430310261ONIT ' S WAY 2001 - 09 - 27 508 . 820310262OFFICEDEPOT ,INC 2001 - 09 - 27 389 . 970310263OGILVIE , JASON A 2001 - 09 - 27 42 . 000310264ODYSSEYMANUFACTURINGCO2001 - 09 - 27 4 , 509 . 000310265PITNEYBOWES ,INC 2001 - 09 - 27 11 , 092 . 000310266PROCTORCONSTRUCTION2001 - 09 - 27 500 . 000310267PRYORRESOURCES , INC 2001 - 09 - 27 132 . 89
0310268 PETTY CASH 2001 - 09 - 27 2 . 54
0310269 PORT CONSOLIDATED 2001 - 09 - 27 188 . 970310270PRAXAIRDISTRIBUTION2001 - 09 - 27 312 . 52
0310271 PERMA - FIX 2001 - 09 - 27 2 , 553 . 60
0310272 PESHA , JESSICA 2001 - 09 - 27 38 . 620310273PER - SE TECHNOLOGIES - PHYS SVCS 2001 - 09 - 27 20 , 285 . 75
0310274 PARALEE COMPANY INC 2001 - 09 - 27 375 . 000310275POWELL , ANN 2001 - 09 - 27 29 . 20
0310276 QUALITY BOOKS , INC 2001 - 09 - 27 24 . 40
0310277 RELIABLE SEPTIC AND SERVICES 2001 - 09 - 27 150 . 000310278RINGHAVEREQUIPMENTCOMPANY2001 - 09 - 27 961 . 670310279ROHANI , SASAN 2001 - 09 - 27 51 . 000310280ROBERTS & REYNOLDS PA 2001 - 09 - 27 61984 . 330310281RECORDEDBOOKS , LLC 2001 - 09 - 27 7 . 000310282R & G SOD FARMS 2001 - 09 - 27 450 . 000310283RELIABLETRANSMISSIONSERVICE2001 - 09 - 27 242 . 350310284RUBBERSTAMPEXPRESS & MORE 2001 - 09 - 27 24 . 950310285RELIABLEPOLYJOHNSERVICES2001 - 09 - 27 118 . 680310286RANGERCONSTRUCTIONINDUSTRIES2001 - 09 - 27 8 , 834 . 500310287REGIONSINTERSTATEBILLING2001 - 09 - 27 11059 . 680310288RAUTH , GENE 2001 - 09 - 27 89 . 320310289REAM , CHARLES R 2001 - 09 - 27 100 . 000310290RASMUSSEN , KARA 2001 - 09 - 27 133 . 900310291RENAISSANCEORLANDOHOTEL - 2001 - 09 - 27 238 . 000310292ROGERDEANCHEVROLET2001 - 09 - 27 91 . 390310293RUPPERT , DAVID 2001 - 09 - 27 500 . 000310294SCHOPP , BARBARA G 2001 - 09 - 27 210 . 000310295SCOTT ' S SPORTING GOODS 2001 - 09 - 27 241 . 080310296SEWELLHARDWARECO , INC 2001 - 09 - 27 399 . 92031029 ; SOUTHERN BUILDING CODE 2001 - 09 - 27 69 . 00
0310298 REXEL SOUTHERN ELECTRIC SUPPLY 2001 - 09 - 27 189 . 680310299SUNRISEFORDTRACTOR &2001 - 09 - 27 13 . 20
0310300 STEIL , HOLLY 2001 - 09 - 27 84 . 68
0310301 SERVICE REFRIGERATION CO , INC 2001 - 09 - 27 910 . 00
0310302 STRUNK FUNERAL HOME 2001 - 09 - 27 300 . 00
0310303 SEMBLER , CHARLES W 2001 - 09 - 27 9 , 849 . 970310304SIGNSINADAY2001 - 09 - 27 65 . 00
0310305 SUBWAY STAMP SHOP INC 2001 - 09 - 27 35 . 200310306SOUTHERNSEWEREQUIPMENTSALES2001 - 09 - 27 320 . 760310307SUBSTANCEABUSECOUNCIL2001 - 09 - 27 154 . 500310308SEXTON , HILDY 2001 - 09 - 27 80 . 00
October 16 , 2001
11
I CIA
CHECK NAME CHECK CHECK
NUMBER DATE AMOUNT
0310309 SYSCO FOOD SERVICES OF 2001 - 09 - 27 416 . 75
0310310 STEWART MINING INDUSTRIES INC 2001 - 09 - 27 5 , 046 . 26
0310311 STARCK , DONNA 2001 - 09 - 27 16 . 36
0310312 SEVILLE CORP 2001 - 09 - 27 1 , 036 . 32
0310313 SOUTHERN SECURITY SYSTEMS OF 2001 - 09 - 27 35 . 00
0310314 SAFETY PRODUCTS INC 2001 - 09 - 27 232 . 25
0310315 STAGE & SCREEN 2001 - 09 - 27 35 . 38
0310316 SOUTHERN COMPUTER SUPPLIES INC 2001 - 09 - 27 170 . 10
0310317 SCHLITT , MICHAEL 2001 - 09 - 27 500 . 00
0310318 SEBASTIAN POLICE DEPARTMENT 2001 - 09 - 27 50 . 00
0310319 SUPPLEE , CHARLES 2001 - 09 - 27 500 . 00
0310320 STERICYCLE INC 2001 - 09 - 27 363 . 76
0310321 SUN CONTAINER INC 2001 - 09 - 27 193 . 37
0310322 SEYMOUR , LINDA 2001 - 09 - 27 38 . 50
0310323 SUNNYTECH INC - FL 2001 - 09 - 27 21021 . 00
0310324 SENICAL , TERRY 2001 - 09 - 27 287 . 00
0310325 STEPHENS , LARRY 2001 - 09 - 27 259 . 00
0310326 SVENTLANA MONTGOMERY 2001 - 09 - 27 475 . 00
0310327 STARR , WILLIAM J 2001 - 09 - 27 612 . 15
0310326 TITLEIST 2001 - 09 - 27 1 , 486 . 73
0310329 TEXACO CREDIT CARD CENTER 2001 - 09 - 27 4 , 468 . 64
0310330 THOMPSON PUBLISHING GROUP , INC 2001 - 09 - 27 279 . 00
0310331 TRUGREEN CHEMLAWN 2001 - 09 - 27 753 . 00
0310332 TREASURE COAST MARINE OF VERO 2001 - 09 - 27 11670 . 84
0310333 SCRIPPS TREASURE COAST 2001 - 09 - 27 996 . 16
0310334 TREASURE COAST SAFETY COUNCIL 2001 - 09 - 27 275 . 00
0310335 TARGET STORES COMMERCIAL 2001 - 09 - 27 118 . 90
0310336 TOMMY HILFIGER GOLF 2001 - 09 - 27 186 . 72
0310337 U S FILTER DISTRIBUTION GROUP 2001 - 09 - 27 34 , 682 . 61
0310338 U S D A RURAL HOUSING SERVICE 2001 - 09 - 27 326 . 07
0310339 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE 2001 - 09 - 27 82 . 12
0310340 VERO BEACH PRINTING INC 2001 - 09 - 27 422 . 00
0310341 VERO BEACH , CITY OF 2001 - 09 - 27 10 , 029 . 20
0310342 VERO BEACH , CITY OF 2001 - 09 - 27 176 . 83
0310343 VERO LAWNMOWER CENTER ,INC 2001 - 09 - 27 9 . 00
0310344 VONBUELOW , ROBERT 2001 - 09 - 27 8 . 20
0310345 VIDEO PALACE 2001- 09 - 27 11040 . 00
0310346 VERO BEACH POLICE DEPARTMENT 2001 - 09 - 27 165 . 97
0310347 VEY , CARRIE 2001 - 09 - 27 220 . 00
0310348 VERO BEARING & BOLT 2001 - 09 - 27 301 . 37
0310349 VERO HERITAGE ,INC 2001 - 09 - 27 870 . 00
0310350 VICKERS , DAVID SCOTT 2001 - 09 - 27 6 . 00
0310351 VON HOLTZBRINCK PUBLISHING 2001 - 09 - 27 115 . 36
0310352 VERO COLLISION CENTER 2001 - 09 - 27 613 . 00
0310353 WAL - MART 2001 - 09 - 27 225 . 22
0310354 WITTEK GOLF SUPPLY CO , INC 2001 - 09 - 27 379 . 62
0310355 WILLHOFF , PATSY 2001 - 09 - 27 130 . 00
0310356 WILLIAM THIES & SONS ,INC 2001 - 09 - 27 144 . 00
0310357 WILLIAMS , BETTY R , RN 2001 - 09 - 27 25 . 00
0310358 WALGREENS PHARMACY # 4642 2001 - 09 - 27 27 . 57
0310359 WEST GROUP PAYMENT CTR 2001 - 09 - 27 1 , 692 . 50
0310360 WASTE MANAGEMENT 2001 - 09 - 27 175 , 661 . 13
0310361 WOLF ROOFING & SIDING 2001 - 09 - 27 41310 . 00
0310362 WATERVIEW PRESS INC 2001 - 09 - 27 46 . 02
0310363 WHEELED COACH INDUSTRIES INC 2001 - 09 - 27 213 . 51
0310364 W . S . DARLEY & CO 2001 - 09 - 27 1 , 275 . 70
0310365 WESTERN VIDEO , INC 2001 - 09 - 27 11168 . 75
October 16 , 2001
12
Du p
ulA r a s- b
CHECK NAME CHECK CHECK
NUMBER DATE AMOUNT
0310366 XEROX CORPORATION 2001 - 09 - 27 216 . 60
0310367 YAVORSKY ' S TRUCK SERVICE , INC 2001 - 09 - 27 24 . 33
0310368 ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE 2001 - 09 - 27 48 . 25
0310369 MILLER , JOSEPH 2001 - 09 - 27 420 . 24
0310370 STEFFEN , KURT 2001 - 09 - 27 430 . 08
0310371 DAVIS , RICHARD 2001 - 09 - 27 332 . 80
0310372 WODTKE , RUSSELL 2001 - 09 - 27 591 . 94
0310373 LICARI , LINDA 2001 - 09 - 27 391 . 66
0310374 BAKER , RON D . 2001 - 09 - 27 522 . 00
0310375 PHIPPS , DAVID 2001 - 09 - 27 924 . 88
0310376 ROYAL , THOMAS 2001 - 09 - 27 582 . 98
03 1037 7 BRUBAKER , KARL 2001 - 09 - 27 7 . 20
0310378 BRANDON CAPITAL CORP 2001 - 09 - 27 79 . 90
0310379 MELROSE , JAMES 2001 - 09 - 27 25 . 05
0310380 SCHLITT , MICHAEL 2001 - 09 - 27 18 . 46
0310381 LUCAS , PAUL 2001 - 09 - 27 46 . 23
0310382 R ZORC & SONS BUILDERS INC 2001 - 09 - 27 69 . 18
0310383 DOYLE , JAMES W 2001 - 09 - 27 2 . 96
0310364 PENALBA , MARVIN AND 2001 - 09 - 27 39 . 02
0310365 HOLIDAY BUILDERS 2001 - 09 - 27 121 . 71
0310386 RERAN , DEAN 2001 - 09 - 27 54 . 27
0310387 PITTMAN , CYNTHIA 2001 - 09 - 27 82 . 15
0310388 SMITH , ANDREA AND 2001 - 09 - 27 9 . 66
0310389 BLAKLEY , JAMES C JR 2001 - 09 - 27 31 . 67
0310390 HANOUMIS , JUANITA 2001 - 09 - 27 38 . 25
0310391 REMAX CONNECTION 2001 - 09 - 27 60 . 13
0310392 LACHAPELLE , GERARD 2001 - 09 - 27 46 . 35
0310393 GHO VERO BEACH INC 2001 - 09 - 27 115 . 48
0310394 WHITE , WILLA D 2001 - 09 - 27 29 . 57
0310395 PERUGINI CONSTRUCTION 2001 - 09 - 27 34 . 85
0310396 KOLLER , DARLENE 2001 - 09 - 27 37 . 35
0310397 BOOMGAAARD , FRANK 2001 - 09 - 27 47 . 43
0310398 SANDERFORD , STEPHEN M 2001 - 09 - 27 41 . 86
0310399 WILLIAMS , RANDALL E 2001 - 09 - 27 58 . 28
0310400 GOLDSMIH , JAMES R OR 2001 - 09 - 27 47 . 97
0310401 WELLINGTON HOMES 2001 - 09 - 27 37 . 72
0310402 MAXWELL , JAMES R 2001 - 09 - 27 42 . 58
0310403 BOOT COUNTRY # 752 ( 10053 ) 2001 - 09 - 27 137 . 43
0310404 PENDLETON , THOMAS AND 2001 - 09 - 27 50 . 23
0310405 MALINOS , JOHN 2001 - 09 - 27 32 . 80
0310406 DE VRIES , MARTHA 2001 - 09 - 27 45 . 55
0310407 WHITING , EMILY M 2001 - 09 - 27 83 . 56
0310408 HARRISON , LOUIS W 2001 - 09 - 27 36 . 58
0310409 DURST , ROBERT D 2001 - 09 - 27 16 . 82
0310410 PASSAGE ISLAND HOMES INC 2001 - 09 - 27 235 . 09
0310411 ADAMS , JESSICA 2001 - 09 - 27 27 . 66
0310412 CHANNING CORP XX1X 2001 - 09 - 27 36 . 68
0310413 BLACKBURN , JEFF 2001 - 09 - 27 16 . 29
0310414 LURIA IMPROVEMENTS LLC 2001 - 09 - 27 158 . 57
0310415 DONLEY , THOMAS 2001 - 09 - 27 70 . 78
0310416 PATILLO , JENNIFER 2001 - 09 - 27 16 . 62
0310417 ATTIC 60 2001 - 09 - 27 320 . 74
0310418 BRACKETT , MICHAEL G 2001 - 09 - 27 22 . 63
0310419 KERSEY , ROBERT 2001 - 09 - 27 19 . 25
0310420 ABUSHARIFAH , ALI AYED 2001 - 09 - 27 43 . 17
0310421 HANES , RUST E 2001 - 09 - 27 57 . 80
0310422 BOYINGTON , JULIA 2001 - 09 - 27 11 . 51
0310423 SCHROEDER , EVA 2001 - 09 - 27 64 . 96
0310424 GUHSE , MERRI JEAN 2001 - 09 - 27 46 . 78
0310425 LEWIS , FREDERICK 2001 - 09 - 27 2 . 52
October 16 , 2001
13
CHECK NAME
CHECK
NUMBER CHECK
DATE AMOUNT
0310426 NAZON , JOCELINE
0310427 KOCH , DAVID
2001 - 09 - 27 57 . 73
0310428 THARPE , JOHN S
2001 - 09 - 27 23 . 70
0310429 JOHANNSEN , CARSTEN
2001 - 09 - 27 84 . 86
0310430 TROTT , LINDA WESTBERRY
2001 - 09 - 27 28 . 30
2001 - 09 - 270310431BELFORD , DENNIS 23 . 43
0310432 WILCOX , JERRY
2001 - 09 - 27 37 . 52
0310433 FRADETTE , LEE ANN
2001 - 09 - 27 17 . 42
0310434 CZTALAN , SAMUEL A
2001 - 09 - 27 28 . 86
2001 - 09 - 270310435MGHCONSTRUCTIONINC 93 . 23
0310436 AT EASE ARMY/NAVY STORE
2001 - 09 - 27 174 . 23
2001- 09 _ 270310437COTTONE , GENOVEFFA 77 . 21
0310438 HIPS , PHILIP J
2001 - 09 - 27
17 . 01
0310439 BURGOON BERGER CONST CO
2001 - 09 - 27
38 . 35
0310440 GARCIA , ARTURO
2001 - 09 - 27
113 . 33
0310441 CROOM CONSTRUCTION CO
2001 - 09 - 27 81 . 48
0310442 R ZORC & SONS BUILDERS INC
2001 - 09 - 27
63 . 92
0310443 DEAN , GREGORY
2001 - 09 - 27 81 . 91
0310444 STEWART , DAVID
2001 - 09 - 27
37 . 13
0310445 WISSEL CONSTRUCTION
2001 - 09 - 27 36 . 92
0310446 MURPHY , CAROL A
2001 - 09 - 27 59 . 32
0310447 HOLIDAY BUILDERS
2001 - 09 - 27 33 . 94
0310448 BARTH CONSTRUCTION III INC
2001 - 09 - 27 55 . 43
0310449 SCHLITT , LARRY
2001 - 09 - 27
70 . 00
0310450 HERAULT , CAROL L
2001 - 09 - 27 48 . 46
0310451 COTTON , BERNARD
2001 - 09 - 27 3 . 40
0310452 EBLE , KERRY
2001 - 09 - 27 94 . 58
0310453MATAKP.ETIS , MARK AND
2001 - 09 - 27 40 . 73
0310454 GHO VERO BEACH INC
2001 - 09 - 27 31 . 19
0310455 FRETWELL , LOUIE AND
2001 - 09 - 27 136 . 44
0310456 FLORSHEIM FACTORY # 18273
2001 - 09 - 27 16 . 34
0310457 BEAZER HOMES CORP
2001 - 09 - 27 80 . 06
0310458 GOSSELIN , GERALD J
2001 - 09 - 27 13 . 12
0310459 CASTELLANI , DA-NTE J
2001 - 09 _ 27 29 . 58
0310460 SN OF INDIAN RIVER INC
2001 - 09 - 27 169 . 30
0310461 SMITH , RICHARD L
2001 - 09 - 27 39 . 96
0310462 OCEAN ATLANTIC CUSTOM PRINTING 2001 - 09 - 27
46 . 03
0310463 BARNES , GLEN A JR AND30 . 10
0310464 HATCH , DANIEL F JR
2001 - 09 - 27 37 . 93
2001 - 09 - 27 61 . 470310465BANOVARCHITECTURE & CONST 2001 - 09 - 270310466UNIFOURHOMEBUILDERSOFIRCO2001 19 . 52
0310467 CHAMBLISS , MICHAEL D
09 - 27 30 . 53
0310468 SEA OAKSINVESTMENT LTD
2001 - 09 - 27 50 . 16
0310469 BRESNAHAN , MATTHEW
2001 - 09 - 27 1 30
0310470 ESTATE OF GUS KRONBERG
2001 - 09 - 27 40 . 72
0310471 MC GARVEY , FRANCIS NEIL
2001 - 09 - 27 63 . 13
2001 - 09 - 27 11 . 820310472SESAY , WENDY
0310473 BROWN , JACQUELINE L
2001 - 09 - 27 29 . 51
0310474 K A MORELLO CONTRACTING
2001 - 09 - 27 32 . 56
0310475 LEWINGDON , ROBERT
2001 - 09 - 27
10 . 79
0310476 WILLIAMS , RESHANNA
2001 - 09 - 27 20 . 61
0310477 CHANNING CORP XX1X
2001 - 09 - 27 25 . 44
0310478 GREENE , STEVEN
2001 - 09 - 27 35 . 96
0310479 LENZ , VANESSA
2001 - 09 - 27 43 . 70
0310480 KENSINGTON ASSOC
2001 - 09 - 27 3 . 12
0310481 NELSON , DONALD D
2001 - 09 - 27 44 . 09
2001 - 09 - 27 49 . 22
October 16 , 2001
14
CHECK NAME
NUMBER CHECK CHECK
DATE AMOUNT
0310482 MORCILLO , CHRIS AND
0310483 RIPLEY , LUCAS
2001 09 - 27
32 . 30
0310484 THOMAS , ALAN AND
2001 - 09 - 27
57 . 76
0310485 VOSORNIK , WILLIAM J
2001 - 09 - 27 25 . 96
0310486 MAZZARELLA , MICHAEL
2001 - 09 - 27 22 , 45
0310487 ALLEN , DEAN
2001 - 09 - 27 32 . 99
0310488 HEMBERGER , KEVIN M
2001 - 09 - 27
79 . 32
0310489 PHELPS , PAMELA
2001 - 09 - 27 68 . 55
0310490 CHESTNUT , KENNETH C
2001 - 09 - 27 12 . 33
0310491 HARDEN , MARIE
2001 - 09 - 27 2.00
0310492 SAMOKS , JESSICA
2001 - 09 - 27 6 . 68
0310493 BERNARD , RACHEL
2001 - 09 - 27 31 . 63
0310494ANDRES , BRUCE W
2001 - 09 - 27 23 . 49
2001 - 09 - 270310495HAMILTONPLACEINC 45 . 46
0310496 DUMM , BETTY
2001 - 09 - 27 12 . 42
03104972001 - 09 - 27 85 . 06RYAN , NICHOLAS E JR 2001 - 09 _ 270310498SILVERMAN , MICHAEL 78 . 20
0310499 COLON - TOSCANO , CAROL
2001 - 09 - 27 5 . 80
0310500 HEFFINGTON , MARY M
2001 - 09 - 27 41 . 81
0 2001 - 09 - 27 33 . 77310501KURUSIS , JENNIFER NICOLE 2001 - 09 - 270310502FLETCHER , THERESA I58 . 58
0310503 2001 - 09 - 27 18 . 48MASCIANA , RANDALL C 2001 - 09 - 270310504BOOS - GMS SEBASTIAN LLC 76 . 94
0310505 LUNA2001 - 09 - 27 418 . 96CAROLINEK2001 - 09 - 270310506REGAN , KELLI 67 . 08
0310507 2001 - 09 - 27HOLYCROSS , CURTIS 2001 - 09 - 27
73 . 16
0310508 BOYLE , CAROLYN M AND32 . 78
0310509 BICKFORD , JENNIFER
2001 - 09 _ 27 18 . 81
PERSONS , ALBERT0310510PE
2001 - 09 - 27 49 . 43
0310511 PAGAN2001 - 09 - 27,
MARC 80 . 68
0310512 WILSON , GAYLE
2001 - 09 - 27 68 . 19
0310513 PEREZ , ANTHONY J
2001 - 09 - 27
13 . 53
03105142001 - 09 - 27 46 . 83RODRIGUES , EMILZA 2001 - 09 _ 270310515PITTS , CHARLES E 50 . 00
0310516 COLLINS , MICHAEL A
2001 - 09 - 27 30 . 01
0310517 SMITH , ROBERT 0 JR
2001 - 09 - 27 51 . 29
0310518 2001 - 09 - 27 36 . 84THOMPSON , WILLIIAM T 2001 - 09 - 270310519BEVERLY , CHUCK 41 . 33
0310520 RIVERA , CHRISTINA
2001 - 09 - 27 33 . 21
0310521 SCALI , TNEATHA
2001 - 09 - 27 67 . 09
03105222001 - 09 - 27 20 . 94AKINS , VINCENT 2001 - 09 - 27 63 . 96
987 , 881 . 26
October 16 , 2001
15
BA
7. C. Approval Warrants
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of October 5 , 2001 :
To : HONORABLE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
DATE : OCTOBER 5 , 2001
SUBJECT : APPROVAL OF WARRANTS
FROM : EDWIN M. FRY, JR. , FINANCE DIRECTOR
In compliance with Chapter 136 . 06 , Florida Statutes , all warrants issued by the
Board of County Commissioners are to be recorded in the Board minutes .
Approval is requested for the attached list of warrants, issued by the Clerk to
the Board, for the time period of October 1 , 2001 to October 4 , 2001 .
Attachment :
ON MOTION by Commissioner Macht, SECONDED BY Vice
Chairman Stanbridge , the Board unanimously 4 - 0 ,
Commissioner Adams absent) approved the list of warrants
issued by the Clerk to the Board for the period October 1 -4 ,
2001 , as requested .
October 16 , 2001
16
CHECK NAME CHECK CHECKNUMBERDATEAMOUNT
0021391 DOOLITTLE & ASSOCIATES 2001 - 10 - 01 400 . 000021392CARTER , JULIET B 2001 - 10 - 01 693 . 000021394TEAMSTERSLOCALUNIONNO7692001 - 10 - 03
0021395 TEAMSTERS LOCA-. UNION NO 769 2001 - 10 - 03
1 , 893 . 91
3 , 847 . 900310523ANDERSON , FRED 2001 - 10 - 01 258 . 000310524BIEMANN , HERMAN 2001 - 10 - 01 368 . 000310525BROXTON , LYDIA 2001 - 10 - 01 233 . 000310526BEUTTELL , PETER M 2001 - 10 - 01 285 . 000310527BILKENGROUP2001 - 10 - 01
0310528 BELL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT 2001 - 10 - 01
1 , 219 . 00
228 . 000310529BOUYSSOU , STEPHANE H 2001 - 10 - 01 412 . 000310530BREVARDCOUNTYHOUSINGAUTHRTY2001 - 10 - 01 1 , 694 . 680310531BABCOCK , DEAN 2001 - 10 - 01 316 . 000310532CORR , RHODA L 2001 - 10 - 01 247 . 000310533CPEASSOCIATES2001 - 10 - 01 31962 . 000310534CAPAK , GERALD T 2001 - 10 - 01 413 . 000310535CARONE , PAUL 2001 - 10 - 01 372 . 000310536CAPPELLUTI , RICHARD 2001 - 10 - 01 471 . 000310537CARLUCCI , LEONARD A 2001 - 10 - 01 343 . 000310538DOOLITTLE , JAMES A & ASSOCIATES 2001 - 10 - 01 21601 . 000310539DOVE , E WILSON 2001 - 10 - 01 298 . 000310540EDGEWOODPLACE ( 305 - 113 )2001 - 10 - 01 496 . 000310541EVANS , ALFRED 2001 - 10 - 01 267 . 000310542FOGERTY , GEORGE A 2001 - 10 - 01 318 . 000310543FRESH , DANIEL J 2001 - 10 - 01 272 . 000310544FOGARTYENTERPRISES , INC 2001 - 10 - 01 373 . 000310545FORD , ROBERT J 2001 - 10 - 01 380 . 000310546GASKILL , ROBERT 2001 - 10 - 01 282 , 000310547GIFFORDGROVES , LTD 2001 - 10 - 01 7 , 725 . 000310548GRACE ' S LANDING LTD 2001 - 10 - 01 71049 . 000310549HOLM , LEO 2001 - 10 - 01 400 . 000310550HUNLEY , J MICHAEL 2001 - 10 - 01 535 . 000310551JAMESADOOLITTLE & ASSOCIATES 2001 - 10 - 01 3 , 172 . 000310552JULIN , PAUL 2001 - 10 - 01 386 . 000310553JOHNSTON , PATTIE 2001 - 10 - 01 108 . 000310554JACKOWSKI , MICHAEL 2001 - 10 - 01 353 . 000310555JONES , N CKETA AND FPL 2001 - 10 - 01 34 . 000310556JONES , ALPHONSO 2001 - 10 - 01 312 . 000310557KNOWLES , MARK OR ANNA 2001 - 10 - 01 234 . 000310558LAWRENCE , TERRY A 2001 - 10 - 01 177 . 000310559LANGLEY , PHILIP G 2001 - 10 - 01 433 . 000310560LINDSEYGARDEN ' S APARTMENTS 2001 - 10 - 01 81549 . 000310561LAPPERT , ANN OR RONALD 2001 - 10 - 01 353 . 000310562LEIFER , BRUCE 2001 - 10 - 01 503 . 000310563MODINVESTMENTS2001 - 10 - 01 876 . 000310564MONTGOMERY , WILLIAM 2001 - 10 - 01 215 . 000310565MALGERIA , PRISCILLA 2001 - 10 - 01 434 . 000310566MEAD , THOMAS H OR HELEN S 2001 - 10 - 01
0310567 NORMAN , DOUGLAS OR BARBARA 2001 - 10 - 01
328 . 00
357 . 000310568ORANGECOUNTYHOUSINGAND2001 - 10 - 01 763 . 670310569OATHOUT , GENE 2001 - 10 - 01 198 . 000310570PALMERTRAILERPARK2001 - 10 - 01
0310571 PIERSON , JOHN H DBA
277 . 00
2001 - 10 - 01 622 . 000310572PALUMBO , LOUIS 2001 - 10 - 01 353 . 000310573PRICE , GLORIA 2001 - 10 - 01 246 . 000310574REAGAN , WILLIE C 2001 - 10 - 01 521 . 000310575RAUDENBUSH , ERNEST 2001 - 10 - 01 290 . 000310576RIVERPARKPLACE2001 - 10 - 01 6 , 230 . 000310577STFRANCISMANOROFVEROBEACH2001 - 10 - 01 3 , 703 . 00
October 16 , 2001
17
sit i f t
CHECK NAME CHECK CHECK
NUMBER DATE AMOUNT
0310578 SCROGGS , BETTY DAVIS 2001 - 10 - 01 313 . 00
0310579 SACCO , JACQUELINE AND / OR 2001 - 10 - 01 302 . 00
0310580 STUART HOUSING AUTHORITY 2001 - 10 - 01 506 . 67
0310581 SANDY PINES 2001 - 10 - 01 4 , 877 . 00
0310582 SHELTON , ROBERT L 2001 - 10 - 01 336 . 00
0310583 SANGBUSH , DONALD 2001 - 10 - 01 278 . 00
0310584 STARCK , MICHAEL R 2001 - 10 - 01 387 . 00
0310585 STRIBLING , WILLIAM JR 2001 - 10 - 01 281 . 00
0310586 SUNDMAN , IVAN 2001 - 10 - 01 391 . 00
0310587 STIMELING , PAUL B OR MARGARET 2001 - 10 - 01 273 . 00
0310588 SARTAIN , CHARLES S & TELECIA 2001 - 10 - 01 215 . 00
0310589 TOWN & COUNTRY LEASING 2001 - 10 - 01 205 . 00
0310590 TRIPLETT PROPERTIES , LLC 2001 - 10 - 01 446 . 00
0310591 ULISKY , WILLIAM B OR MARLENE 2001 - 10 - 01 114 . 00
0310592 VERO MOBILE HOME PARK 2001 - 10 - 01 167 . 00
0310593 VERO FIRST CORPORATION 2001 - 10 - 01 11354 . 00
0310594 WILLIAMS , DEBRA WASHINGTON 2001 - 10 - 01 68 . 00
0310595 WILKERSON , KENISHA 2001 - 10 - 01 21 . 00
0310596 WILLIAMS , EDITH 2001 - 10 - 01 286 . 00
0310597 WESSENDORF , FRED 2001 - 10 - 01 408 . 00
0310598 WOODS OF VERO BEACH 2001 - 10 - 01 4 , 389 . 00
0310599 YORK , LILLY B 2001 - 10 - 01 244 . 00
0310600 YORK , DAVID 2001 - 10 - 01 378 . 00
0310601 ZANCA , LEONARD 2001 - 10 - 01 590 . 00
0310602 BARTON , JEFFREY K - CLERK 2001 - 10 - 02 219 , 108 . 87
0310603 FLORIDA ASSOCIATION OF 2001 - 10 - 02 400 . 00
0310604 FLORIDA BAR , THE 2001 - 10 - 02 215 . 00
0310605 FLORIDA SECTION INSTITUTE OF 2001 - 10 - 02 125 . 00
0310606 GREENE , ROBERT E 2001 - 10 - 02 1 , 976 . 59
0310607 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY 2001 - 10 - 02 62 , 082 . 24
0310608 INDIAN RIVER COMMUNITY COLLEGE 2001 - 10 - 02 19 , 100 . 24
0310609 NOLTE , DAVID C 2001 - 10 - 02 211 , 681 . 51
0310610 RAMADA INN NORTH 2001 - 10 - 02 138 . 00
0310611 RADISSON HOTEL ORLANDO 2001 - 10 - 02 230 . 00
0310612 SEXUAL ASSAULT ASSISTANCE 2001 - 10 - 02 41964 . 24
0310613 SOUTHERN SECURITY SYSTEMS OF 2001 - 10 - 02 145 . 00
0310614 TREASURE COAST REGIONAL 2001 - 10 - 02 37 , 273 . 00
0310615 THOMPSON PUBLISHING GROUP , INC 2001 - 10 - 02 279 . 00
0310616 VERO BEACH , CITY OF 2001 - 10 - 02 9 , 462 . 50
0310617 A A FIRE EQUIPMENT , INC 2001 - 10 - 04 99 . 50
0310618 ABC - CLIO INC 2001 - 10 - 04 77 . 04
0310619 ADVANCED GARAGE DOORS , INC 2001 - 10 - 04 82 . 00
0310620 AIRBORNE EXPRESS 2001 - 10 - 04 18 . 16
0310621 ALPHA ACE HARDWARE 2001 - 10 - 04 51 . 38
0310622 AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION 2001 - 10 - 04 489 . 25
0310623 APPLE INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY CO 2001 - 10 - 04 1 , 622 . 03
0310624 ATCO TOOL SUPPLY 2001 - 10 - 04 25 . 85
0310625 AUTO SUPPLY CO OF VERO BEACH , 2001 - 10 - 04 21151 . 63
0310626 A T & T 2001 - 10 - 04 147 . 14
0310627 AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE 2001 - 10 - 04 46 , 704 . 41
0310628 AMERIGAS 2001 - 10 - 04 133 . 19
0310629 ASHWORTH INC 2001 - 10 - 04 582 . 10
0310630 ATLANTIC COASTAL TITLE CORP 2001 - 10 - 04 66 . 00
0310631 AUTO PARTS OF VERO , INC 2001 - 10 - 04 86 . 47
0310632 AMERICAN REPORTING 2001 - 10 - 04 342 . 00
0310633 ARCH WIRELESS 2001 - 10 - 04 122 . 68
0310634 ARTHUR J GALLAGHER & CO 2001 - 10 - 04 856 , 861 . 00
0310635 ADVANCED PROCESSING AND 2001 - 10 - 04 1 , 200 . 0C
October 16 , 2001
18
i
CHECK NAME CHECK CHECK
NUMBER DATE AMOUNT
0310636 A T & T 2001 - 10 - 04 415 . 620310637APPLIEDTECHNOLOGYAND2001 - 10 - 04 70 , 827 850310638ABCPRINTINGCO2001 - 10 - 04
0310639 AQUA - MARINE SERVICES INC 2001 - 10 - 04
8 00
0310640 AKINS , JAMES
702 . 38
2001 - 10 - 04 5 . 000310641ADT2001 - 10 - 04
0310642 BENSONS LOCK SERVICE
82 . 50
2001 - 10 - 04 10 . 000310643BOLING , STAN 2001 - 10 - 04
0310644 BRUGNOLI , ROBERT J PHD
65 . 22
2001 - 10 - 04 11050 . 000310645BARTON , JEFFREY K - CLERK 2001 - 10 - 04
0310646 BAKER & TAYLOR INC
4 , 880 . 50
2001 - 10 - 04 11027 . 120310647BRODARTCO2001 - 10 - 04
0310648 BOYNTON PUMP & IRRIGATION 2001 - 10 - 04
1 , 631 . 73
0310649 BLAKESLEE MAINTENANCE
23 . 94
2001 - 10 - 04 250 . 000310650BELLSOUTH2001 - 10 - 04 5 , 272 . 340310651BIOCYCLE2001 - 10 - 04 69 . 000310652BELLSOUTHPUBLICCOMMUNICATION2001 - 10 - 04 131 . 400310653BROWN , JASON 2001 - 10 - 04
0310654 BREVARD TITLE ,INC
80 . 72
2001 - 10 - 04 328 . 490310655BROWN & BROWN INSURANCE 2001 - 10 - 04 432 . 250310656BRIGGSEQUIPMENT2001 - 10 - 04 580 . 720310657BAUCHMAN , BERT B H 2001 - 10 - 04 120 . 00
0310658 BARAJAS , ALMA ROSA 2001 - 10 - 04 50 . 000310659BURTONGOLFINC2001 - 10 - 04 73 . 000310660BILLINGS , JOHNATHAN 2001 - 10 - 04 9 . 55
0310661 BELLSOUTH 2001 - 10 - 04 177 . 99
0310662 CAMP , DRESSER & MCKEE , INC 2001 - 10 - 04 8 , 760 . 12
0310663 CITRUS MOTEL 2001 - 10 - 04 36 . 00
0310664 COLD AIR DISTRIBUTORS 2001 - 10 - 04 1 , 018 . 43
0310665 COLKITT SHEET METAL & AIR , INC 2001 - 10 - 04 21 . 98
0310666 COMMUNICATIONS INT ' L INC 2001 - 10 - 04 12 , 962 . 89
0310667 CLERK OF CIRCUIT & COUNTY 2001 - 10 - 04 7 . 00
0310668 CENTER FOR THE ARTS 2001 - 10 - 04 71911 . 38
0310669 COLONIAL ANIMAL HOSPITAL 2001 - 10 - 04 15 . 000310670CLIFFORD , MIKE 2001 - 10 - 04 200 . 00
0310671 CORPORATION OF THE PRESIDENT 2001 - 10 - 04 16 . 25
0310672 CENTER FOR EMOTIONAL AND 2001 - 10 - 04 313 . 50
0310673 COPYCO , LIBERTY DIV OF 2001 - 10 - 04 93 . 97
0310674 CULTURAL COUNCIL OF INDIAN 2001 - 10 - 04 9 , 620 . 60
0310675 CONSTRUCTION LICENSING 2001 - 10 - 04 100 . 00
0310676 CARQUEST AUTO PARTS 2001 - 10 - 04 1 , 117 . 99
0310677 CUTTER & BUCK 2001 - 10 - 04 7 . 68
0310678 CLARRY , ALISON 2001 - 10 - 04 11 . 58
0310679 COOL , KIMBERLY 2001 - 10 - 04 195 . 00
0310680 CONNEXION ENTERPRISES LLC 2001 - 10 - 04 243 . 77
0310681 CENTRAL FLORIDA HAND CENTER 2001 - 10 - 04 51 . 00
0310682 CAIN , JAMES L MD 2001 - 10 - 04 750 . 00
0310683 DAILY COURIER SERVICE 2001 - 10 - 04 1 , 151 . 00
0310684 DELTA SUPPLY CO 2001 - 10 - 04 669 . 870310685DEPENDABLEDODGE ,INC 2001 - 10 - 04 55 . 920310686DICKERSON - FLORIDA ,INC 2001 - 10 - 04 71332 . 19
0310687 FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS 2001 - 10 - 04 50 . 950310688DONSMITH ' S PAINT STORE , INC 2001 - 10 - 04 313 . 62
0310689 DOW , HOWELL , GILMORE . 2001 - 10 - 04 21668 . 88
0310690 DATA SUPPLIES , INC 2001 - 10 - 04 407 . 26
0310691 DIGGS , JEFFREY P 2001 - 10 - 04 222 . 40
0310692 DEAF SERVICE CENTER OF THE 2001 - 10 - 04 625 . 00
October 16 , 2001
19
C-
CHECK NAME CHECK
NUMBER CHECK
DATE AMOUNT
0310693 DALAL , pRAKASH
0310694 DIEHL , MELANIE
2001 - 10 - 04 500 . 00
0310695 DOWNTOWN PRODUCE INC
2001 - 10 - 04 19 . 31
0310696 DILLARD , CASSIE
2001 - 10 - 04 79 . 95
0310697 DMG - MAXIMUS INC
2001 - 10 - 04 38 . 62
0310698 E G P INC
2001 - 10 - 04 162 00
0310699 ELDRIDGE / MYRA p
2001 - 10 - 04 9 , 204 . 00
0310700 EWING2001 - 10 - 04 115 . 50MARSHA
2001 - 10 - 040310701EDGEWOODINVESTIGATIONSINC 13 . 00
0310702 ELLIS , SCOTT
2001 - 10 - 04 950 . 00
0310703 EVERYTHING PERSONALIZED INC
2001 - 10 - 04
9 . 00
0310704 ENGLISH , ELEANOR
2001 - 10 - 04 63 . 86
0310705 EVERGLADES FARM
2001 - 10 - 04
75 . 12
0310706 EDMISTON , APRIL
2001 - 10 - 04
59 . 44
0310707 FGFOA 2001 - 10 - 04 38 . 62
0310708 FATHER & SON APPLIANCE CO
2001 - 10 - 04 240 . 00
0310709 FLORIDA EAST COAST RAILWAY LLC 2001 - 10 -
04330 .
00
0310710 FLORIDA ASSOCIATION OF 8 , 767 . 39
0310711 FLORIDA COCA - COLA BOTTLING CO
2001 - 10 - 04 12 , 416 . 00
2001 - 10 - 04 275 . 950310712FLORIDADETROITDIESEL -ALLISON0310713FLORIDAPOWER & LIGHT COMPANY 2001 - 10 - 04
1 . 194 . 11
0310714 FOOTJOY 1 , 295 . 04
0310715 FLORIDA EAST COAST RAILWAY CO
2001 - 10 - 04 1 , 704 . 82
0310716 FLOWERS BAKING COMPANY OF
2001 - 10 - 04 91254 . 75
0310717 F W & P C 0 A REGION V
2001 - 10 - 04 16 . 56
0310718 FLOW - TECHNOLOGY
2001 - 10 - 04 570 . 00
0310719 FRAZIER , JOHN
2001 - 10 - 04 638 . 74
0310720 FULLER , KERNIE D
2001 - 10 - 04
5 . 01
0310721 FATHER & SON CARPET , INC
2001 - 10 - 04
5 . 00
0310722 FELLSMERE POLICE DEPARTMENT
2001 - 10 - 04 237 . 00
2001 - 10 - 040310723FLORIDAANIMALLEAGUE 25 . 00
0310724 F & W PUBLICATIONS INC
2001 - 10 - 04 15 . 00
0310725 FPL 2001 - 10 - 04 869 . 64
0310726 FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT
2001 - 10 - 04 234 . 80
0310727 FREIGHTLINER TRUCKS OF SOUTH
2001 - 10 - 04 3 , 358 . 79
2001 - 10 - 040310728FIRESTONETIRE & SERVICE 4 . 05
0310729 FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE 2001 - 10 - 04
31687 . 80
2001 - 10
0310730 FLORIDA DEPT OF TRANSPORTATION 13 , 381 . 71
0310731 FLORIDA HIGHWAY PATROL
04 122 . 00
0310732 FIRST AMERICAN TITLE
2001 - 10 - 04 25 . 00
0310733 GALE GROUP , THE
2001 - 10 - 04 101000 . 00
0310734 GATOR LUMBER COMPANY
2001 - 10 - 04 751 . 57
0310735 GENE ' S AUTO GLASS
2001 - 10 - 04 72 . 56
0310736 GLIDDEN COMPANY , THE - 2001 - 10 - 04
2001 - 10 - 04 85 . 00
0310737 GOODKNIGHT LAWN EQUIPMENT , INC 2001 - 10 - 04
199 . 92
0310738 GREYHOUND LINES ,INC . 518 . 16
0310739 GOODYEAR AUTO SERVICE CENTER
2001 - 10 - 04 432 . 50
2001 - 10 - 040310740GOLFNET ,INC 56 . 06
0310741 GRILL REFILL ,INC
2001 - 10 - 04 1 , 120 . 00
0310742 GUARDIAN EQUIPMENT INC
2001 - 10 - 04 266 . 60
0310743 HAMMOND & SMITH , P A
2001 - 10 - 04 150 . 00
0310744 HILL DONNELLY CORPORATION
2001 - 10 - 04 19 , 056 . 00
0310745 HUNTER AUTO SUPPLIES
2001 - 10 - 04 107 . 23
QUEST0310746HERITAGE 2001 - 10 - 04 333 . 60
2001 - 10 - 040310747HUDSONPUMP & EQUIPMENT62 . 92
0310748 HACH COMPANY
2001 - 10 - 04 201 . 60
2001 - 10 - 04 143 . 50
October 16 , 2001
20
CHECK NAME
NUMBER CHECK
DATE CHECK
0310749AMOUNT
HILL MANUFACTURING0310750HIGHLANDSANIMALHOSPITAL
2001 - 10 - 04
154 . 682001 - 10 - 04310751HEWLETTPACKARDEXPSERVICES2001 - 10 - 04
15 . 000310752HARRIS , GREGORY PHD CVE0310753HURLEY , ROGNER , MILLER , COX AND
2001 1 ' 299 . 0010 - 04
1 , 569 . 7 ()0310754 HOUSER , DANIEL R 2001 - 10 - 04
0310755 2001 -617 . 47HOWARD , ROBIN 10 - 04
0310756 HOGAN 2001 - 10 - 04
2
COURTNEY
000 . 00
HUDSON , WELDON0310757 10 - 042001 -500 . 00
0310758IN2001 - 10 - 04
25 . 14
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY0310759 2001 - 2 , 225 . 00INDIANRIVERBATTERY , INC
10 - () 4
175 . 000310760INDIANRIVERBLUEPRINTCOINC
2001 - 10 - 04
0310761 2001 - 10 - 04
1 . 300 . 25
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY UTILITY1 , 096 . 330310762INGRAMLIBRARYSERVICES2001 - 10 - 04
0310763 2001 - 3 , 640 . 8 ()INDIAN RIVER OFFICE CENTRE , INC 2001 -
10 - 04
161 . 070310764INDIANRIVERALL - FAB , INC
10 - 04
0310765 2001 -39 . 00INDIANRIVERMEMORIALHOSPITAL
10 - 04
867 090310766IMI - NET , INC 2001 - 10 - 04
0310767 2001 - 20 . 000 . 00INDIANRIVERCOUNTYSHERIFF ' S
10 - 04
900 . 000310768INTERMEDIACOMMUNICATIONS2001 - 10 - 04
0310769 2001 -3C0 . 00INDIANRIVERHAND10 - 04
0310770 2001 - 10 - 04
73 . 45JACKSONELECTRONICS67 . 500310771JANET ' S AUTO TRIM & GLASS
2001 - 10 - 04
2001 - 10 - 04
27 . 000310772JOHNDEERECOMPANY03107732001 -175 . 00
JOHN
INCANDSONROOFING 10 - 04
0310774 2001 - 10 - 04
6 , 515 . 00AND
DEPOT OF AMERICA450 . 000310775JONES , DAVID M 2001 - 10 - 04
0310776JOHNSON 2001 - I , 551 . 00
MICHELLE L
10 - 04
1 , 800 . 000310777KEATING , ROBERT M 2001 - 10 - 04
0310778 2001 - 10 - 04
69 . 00
0310779
KIMI'EY - HORN & ASSOCIATES , INC 2001 - 10 121 . 48
04KNIGHT & MATHIS ,INC 2 , 640 . 000310780KSMENGINEERING & TESTING
2001 - 10 , 04
0310781 2001 - 10 - 04
29 . 56K & M ELECTRIC SUPPLY INC 255 . 000310782KELLY , CHERRY 2001 - 10 - 04
0310783 2001 - 10 - 04
21 . 56LONG , JAMES T ESQUIRE 45 . 500310784LOWE ' S COMPANIES 2001 - 10 - 04
0310785 INC .
2001 - 10 - 04
5 , 7 () 0 . 00LANDRUM , GREGORY C PSY D 3 , 889 . 330310786LBSMITH , INC 2001 - 10 - 04
0310787 2001 - 10 - 04
575 . 00
LIGHT SOURCE BUSINESS SYSTEMS187 . 622 . 970310788LFIVEROBEACH ,INC 2001 - 10 _ 04
0310789 LES001 - 10 - 04
2266 . 00
CO ,INC 6 , 813 . 690310790LOWE ' S COMPANIES , INC 2001 - 10 - 04
0310791 2001 -106 . 53LBBRYAN & COMPANY 10 - 04
832 . 470310792LINDNER , RUEDIGER MD 2001 - 10 - 04
0310793 2001 - 5 . 931 . 00
MAXWELL PLUMBING ,INC
10 - 04
98 . 000310794MIKESGARAGE2001 - 10 - 04
0310795 2001 - 10 - 04
450 . 00NAGANA , IGNACIO M D 160 . 000310796MASTELLER & MOLER , INC 2001 - 10 - 0 ¢
0310797 MI2001 - 10 - 04
750 . 00MID - STATE MECHANICAL 3 , 900 . 000310798MRBOBPORTABLETOILETRENTAL
2001 - 10 - 0 ¢
0310799 MARC 2001 - 10 - 04
I , 000 . 00
INDUSTRIES 366 . 00
S
0310800 MEDICAL RECORDS SERVICE ,INC
2001 - 10 - 04
0310801 2001 - 10 - 04
69 . 66MATOUSEK , DIANE M 14 . 140310802MCGRIFF , Hp-gBARp R 2001 - 10 - 04
0310803 2001 - 10 - 04
13 . 00MCKEEBOTANICALGARDEN135 . 000310804MCSI2001 - 10 - 04
0310805 2001 - 10 - 04
10 ' 223 . 00NORTHSOUTHSUPPLYINC572 . 850310806NICOSIA , ROGER J DO 2001 - 10 - 04
0310807 NU CO 2 2001 - 10 - 04
4 . 30
INC 3 , 400 . 002001 - 10 - 04
94 . 91
October 16 , 2001
21
CHECK NAME
CHECK CHECK
NUMBER
DATE AMOUNT
0310808 NORTRAX SE L . L . C . 2001 - 10 - 04 442 . 21
0310809 NICHOLS , GEORGE MD 2001 - 10 - 04 200 . 00
0310810 NEC BUSINESS NETWORK SOLUTIONS 2001 - 10 - 04 3 , 361 . 92
0310811 NOWLIN , TIAIRA 2001 - 10 - 04 19 . 31
0310812 OFFICE PRODUCTS & SERVICE 2001 - 10 - 04 208 . 48
0310813 OFFICE DEPOT , INC 2001 - 10 - 04 11549 . 56
0310814 ODYSSEY MANUFACTURING CO 2001 - 10 - 04 765 . 00
0310815 PARKS RENTAL INC 2001 - 10 - 04 355 . 41
0310816 PETTY CASH 2001 - 10 - 04 60 . 16
0310817 PRECAST CONCRETE PRODUCTS 2001 - 10 - 04 11042 . 00
0310818 PRIDE ENTERPRISES 2001 - 10 - 04 31847 . 50
0310819 PETTY CASH
2001 - 10 - 04 65 . 32
0310820 POWERAM ,INC 2001 - 10 - 04 68 . 00
0310821 PETTY CASH
2001 - 10 - 04 14 . 99
0310822 PORT CONSOLIDATED 2001 - 10 - 04 91683 . 18
0310823 PRECISION CONTRACTING 2001 - 10 - 04 21130 . 00
0310824 PULSAFEEDER , INC 2001 - 10 - 04 790 . 22
0310825 PRIZE POSSESSIONS 2001 - 10 - 04 11021 . 46
0310826 PRAXAIR DISTRIBUTION 2001 - 10 - 04 151 . 67
0310827 POMEROY COMPUTER RESOURCES 2001 - 10 - 04 1 , 424 . 00
0310828 PETERSON , COLLEEN 2001 - 10 - 04 94 . 68
0310829 PUBLIX PHARMACY # 0385 2001 - 10 - 04 54 . 95
0310830 PUBLIX PHARMACY # 7642 2001 - 10 - 04 24 . 95
0310831 PROFORMA
2001 - 10 - 04 39 . 90
0310832 PESHA , JESSICA 2001 - 10 - 04 38 . 62
0310833 PROFESSIONAL GOLF CAR CORP 2001 - 10 - 04 294 . 26
0310834 RINKER MATERIALS 2001 - 10 - 04 414 . 22
0310835 RUSSELL CONCRETE , INC 2001 - 10 - 04 109 . 50
0310836 ROBINSON EQUIPMENT COMPANY , INC 2001 - 10 - 04 711 . 52
0310837 ROSEMOUNT INC 2001 - 10 - 04 1 , 896 . 98
0310838 RECORDED BOOKS , LLC 2001 - 10 - 04 601 . 69
0310839 RUBBER STAMP EXPRESS & MORE 2001 - 10 - 04 11 . 70
0310840 RCL DEVELOPMENT 2001 - 10 - 04 500 . 00
0310841 ROYAL CUP COFFEE 2001 - 10 - 04 57 . 60
0310842 REGIONS INTERSTATE BILLING 2001 - 10 - 04 308 . 46
0310843 ROGER DEAN CHEVROLET 2001 - 10 - 04 67 . 88
0310844 R S MEDICAL 2001 - 10 - 04 80 . 00
0310845 SAFETY KLEEN CORP 2001 - 10 -04 116 . 81
0310846 SCOTT ' S SPORTING GOODS 2001 - 10 - 04 1 , 559 . 00
0310847 SEWELL HARDWARE CO , INC 2001 - 10 - 04 105 . 62
0310848 SOUTHERN BUILDING CODE 2001 - 10 - 04 85 . 00
0310849 SOUTHERN EAGLE DISTRIBUTING , 2001 - 10 - 04 450 . 80
0310850 REXEL SOUTHERN ELECTRIC SUPPLY 2001 - 10 - 04 9 . 97
0310851 STATE ATTORNEY 19TH CIRCUIT 2001 - 10 - 04 14 , 334 . 15
0310852 STRUNK FUNERAL HOME 2001 - 10 - 04 800 . 00
0310853 SOLINET 2001 - 10 - 04 561 . 35
0310854 SMITH BROS CONT EQUIP 2001 - 10 - 04 43 . 26
0310855 SMITH , GARY 2001 - 10 - 04 150 . 00
0310856 SYSCO FOOD SERVICES OF 2001 - 10 - 04 467 . 02
0310857 SNOBERGER , RUTH ANN 2001 - 10 - 04 25 . 14
0310858 SIMS , MATTHEW 2001 - 10 - 04 747 . 62
0310859 STANBRIDGE , RUTH 2001 - 10 - 04 33 . 84
0310860 SOUTHERN SECURITY SYSTEMS OF 2001 - 10 - 04 835 . 00
0310861 SAFETY PRODUCTS INC 2001 - 10 - 04 300 . 80
0310862 SOUTHERN COMPUTER SUPPLIES INC 2001 - 10 - 04 532 . 40
0310863 SEELEY , SANDRA 2001 - 10 - 04 6 . 00
0310864 SHERMAN , ROGER 2001 - 10 - 04 2 , 321 . 00
October 16 , 2001
22
l p i 1
4R 9
i1 a i `J is
CHECK NAME CHECK CHECK
NUMBER DATE AMOUNT
0310865 SEMINOLE OF OKEECHOBEE / JUPITER 2001 - 10 - 04 45 . 00
0310866 SEBASTIAN POLICE DEPARTMENT 2001 - 10 - 04 50 . 00
0310867 SUNCOAST COUNSELING & 2001 - 10 - 04 662 . 50
0310868 SEBASTIAN OFFICE SUPPLY 2001 - 10 - 04 75 . 00
0310869 SORIANO , SORCIRE 2001 - 10 - 04 6 . 96
0310870 SUNNYTECH INC - FL 2001 - 10 - 04 802 . 70
0310871 STEPHENS , LARRY 2001 - 10 - 04 280 . 00
0310872 SUEN , JOHN MD 2001 - 10 - 04 770 . 00
0310873 SCOTT ' S TREE SERVICE INC 2001 - 10 - 04 1 , 750 . 00
0310874 SHELL CREDIT CARD CENTER 2001 - 10 - 04 42 . 65
0310875 TARMAC AMERICA INC 2001 - 10 - 04 589 . 05
0310876 TEEJAYS ' 2001 - 10 - 04 148 . 00
0310877 TEN - 8 FIRE EQUIPMENT ,INC 2001 - 10 - 04 21130 . 39
0310878 SCRIPPS TREASURE COAST 2001 - 10 - 04 1 , 082 . 40
0310879 THIRD PARTY SOLUTIONS INC 2001 - 10 - 04 7 . 83
0310880 TARGET STORES COMMERCIAL 2001 - 10 - 04 35 . 40
0310881 THELK , LOU 2001 - 10 - 04 125 . 00
0310882 TEMPLE , INC 2001 - 10 - 04 8 , 812 . 00
0310883 ULVERSCROFT LARGE PRINT 2001 - 10 - 04 107 . 33
0310884 UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA 2001 - 10 - 04 138 . 00
0310885 URGENT CARE WEST 2001 - 10 - 04 276 . 00
0310886 UNISHIPPERS 2001 - 10 - 04 22 . 34
0310887 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE 2001 - 10 - 04 33 . 21
0310888 VERO BEACH , CITY OF 2001 - 10 - 04 5 , 457 . 77
0310889 VERO BEACH , CITY OF 2001 - 10 - 04 159 . 29
0310890 VERO LAWNMOWER CENTER ,INC 2001 - 10 - 04 59 . 36
0310891 VERO BEACH , CITY OF 2001 - 10 - 04 106 . 75
0310892 VERO MARINE CENTER ,INC 2001 - 10 - 04 336 . 59
0310893 VERO BEACH , CITY OF 2001 - 10 - 04 50 . 00
0310894 VERO ORTHOPAEDICS 2001 - 10 - 04 229 . 00
0310895 VERO BEARING & BOLT 2001 - 10 - 04 213 . 30
0310896 VERO COLLISION CENTER 2001 - 10 - 04 613 . 00
0310897 VANTAGE EQUIPMENT CO 2001 - 10 - 04 58 . 81
0310898 VAZZA , CLARA 2001 - 10 - 04 1 , 433 . 50
0310899 WILSON ' S PETROLEUM EQUIPMENT , 2001 - 10 - 04 118 . 90
0310900 WAL - MART PHARMACY ,INC 2001 - 1C - 04 22 . 72
0310901 WILLHOFF , PATSY 2001 - 10 - 04 130 . 00
0310902 WILLIAMS , BETTY R , RN 2001 - 10 - 04 25 . 00
0310903 WINDSOR PROPERTIES 2001 - 10 - 04 155 . 75
0310904 WALGREENS PHARMACY # 4642 2001 - 10 - 04 118 . 87
0310905 WEST GROUP PAYMENT CTR 2001 - 10 - 04 505 . 44
0310906 WALGREEN COMPANY 2001 - 10 - 04 726 . 23
0310907 W W GRAINGER INC 2001 - 10 - 04 29 . 71
0310908 WALMART 2001 - 1C - 04 251 . 22
0310909 XEROX CORPORATION 2001 - 10 - 04 1 , 540 . 00
0310910 YARDI SYSTEMES , INC 2001 - 10 - 04 21097 . 00
0310911 YELLOW PAGES 2001 - 10 - 04 187 . 00
0310912 ZEPHYRHILLS NATURAL SPRING 2001 - 10 - 04 9 . 50
0310913 ZITO , MICHAEL C 2001 - 10 - 04 23 . 37
21185 , 087 . 45
October 16 , 2001
23
7. D. Proclamation Designating Month of November, 2001 as
National Epilepsy Awareness Month
The Proclamation below is entered for the record .
PROCLAMATION
DESIGNATING THE MONTH OF NOVEMBER, 2001 , AS
NATIONAL EPILEPSY AWARENESS MONTH
WHEREAS , Epilepsy, also known as Seizure Disorder, has afflicted mankind since the dawn of our speciesandhasbeenrecognizedsincetheearliestmedicalwritings ; and
WHEREAS, as long ago as 400 B . C . , Hippocrates , the Father of Medicine , repudiated ancient beliefs that
Epilepsy was either a visitation from the gods and sacred or that it was a curse from the gods and people afflictedwiththisdisorderheldpropheticpowers . Hippocrates believed that Epilepsy was a brain disorder; and
WHEREAS, a seizure is a sudden, brief attack of altered consciousness , motor activity or sensoryphenomena . It is a sign that certain brain cells , known as neurons , are discharging an excessive amount ofelectricalimpulses; and
WHEREAS, Epilepsy can be caused by injury to the brain, lack of oxygen at birth , brain tumor, infection
species and brain hemorrhage. In sixty percent of the cases, the cause is unknown and Epilepsy can affect
anyone , at any age and at any time, and more than two million Americans and one hundred and fifty thousandFloridaresidentsareafflictedwithsometypeofEpilepsy; and
WHEREAS, with the administration of anticonvulsant drugs, two thirds of those afflicted with Epilepsy are drugcontrolled ; but lack of education about this disorder has contributed to age-old myths , superstitions and prejudices ,
making the stigma associated with this disorder sometimes worse than the disorder itself; and
WHEREAS, studies carried out in the United States over the past thirty years have indicated that of all
disabilities, Epilepsy poses the greatest barrier to employment with unemployment rates estimated at betweentwentyandtwenty-five percent; and
WHEREAS, people who have Epilepsy make reliable and conscientious workers in job performance ,
productivity, safety, cooperation and attendance and Epilepsy should not be a barrier to success. In addition to the
normal requirements for success , a person who has Epilepsy needs a supportive environment and employers whoarewillingtogivethemanopportunitytobecomeproductivecitizens .
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT PROCLAIMED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN
RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that the month of November, 2001 , be designated as
NATIONAL EPILEPSY AWARENESS MONTH
in Indian River County.
Adopted this 16th day of October, 2001 .
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
Carolineh /
1iwxJ
IL
October 16 , 2001
24
13
7. E. Resignation ofNancy Diamond as the Sebastian Representative
on Parks and Recreation Committee
The Board reviewed a letter of October 1 , 2001 :
October 1 , 2001
Fran Adams ,
Chairperson of Parks and Recreation
Advisory Committee
Dear Fran ,
At this time , after a great deal of thought I must regretfully resign as a
committee member representing Sebastian _ For years I have enjoyed
working with you and the entire committee and I know that have made
a big difference in Indian River County. I wish you and the committee
much luck and success in the future .
RespectfullYours , RECEIVED
cam- •Cc r ti's 0 C 5 2001
Nancy' - 'amond BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSION
ON MOTION by Commissioner Macht, SECONDED BY Vice
Chairman Stanbridge, the Board unanimously 4 - 0 ,
Commissioner Adams absent) accepted the resignation of
Nancy Diamond as the Sebastian representative on Parks and
Recreation Committee .
October 16 , 2001
25
Eli 3 i
7. F. Out-of= County Travel -Commissioners Attend Florida State
Association ofSupervisors of Elections Canvassing Board Workshop
February 28 , 2002 , Orlando
The Board reviewed a letter of September 18 ,2001 :
FSASE Canvassing Board Workshop
F. S • A • S • E • Thursday, February 28 , 2002
Orange County Convention Center
Florida State Association Lecture Hall ( Room 300 )
of Supervisors of Elections 9 AM to 4 PM
RECEIVES
SEP 2 6 2001
BOARD OF COUNTY
September 18 , 2001 COMMISSION
Dear Canvassing Board Member -
The Florida State Association of Supervisors of Elections has put together a Canvassing Board
Workshop to be held on Thursday, February 28 , 2002 , at the Orange County Convention
Center in Orlando from 9 a . m . until 4 p . m . The workshop is for Election Supervisors , County
Judges , County Commissioners , and Canvassing Board Attorneys .
This workshop will highlight the important role that each member of the canvassing board plays
in the election process , and how the sweeping changes brought about by The Election
Reform Act of 2001 will impact next year's Gubernatorial election .
The registration fee of $40 covers the daylong workshop , lunch , and the Canvassing Board
Manual that you will be given that morning . A tentative agenda is enclosed .
We are requesting continuing education credit for this workshop for election supervisors ,
attorneys , and judges ; and we fully expect to have those hours approved .
Space is limited for this workshop so please send in your registration as soon as possible .
Sincerely,
kc-, v4two-3
Terry Vaughan
Bradford County Supervisor of Elections
Chair, FSASE Canvassing Board Committee
October 16 , 2001
26
i1 1 J i
ON MOTION by Commissioner Macht, SECONDED BY Vice
Chairman Stanbridge , the Board unanimously 4 - 0 ,
Commissioner Adams absent) authorized out- of- county travel
for the Commissioners to attend the Canvassing Board
Workshop in Orlando on February 28 , 2002 , as requested .
7. G. Payments to Vendors of Court Related Costs
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of September 28 , 2001 :
TO : Board of County Commissioners
THROUGH : Paul G . Bangel , County Attorney
FROM : Michael C . Zito , Assistant County Attorney
DATE :September 28 , 2001
SUBJECT :Payments to Vendors of Court Related Costs
The Office of the County Attorney has processed and approved payment to the following vendors for the weeks of
August 27 , 2001 through September 24 , 2001 . Listed below are the vendors and the amount of each court - related
cost.
VENDOR : PAYMENT TYPE : AMOUNT :
Gregory C . Landrum , Psy . D . Expert Witness 550 . 00
American Reporting Transcription 11 . 00
Brevard Co . Clerk State Attorney Costs 9 . 00
Patricia B . Held Transcription 35 . 00
Myra A. Eldridge Transcription 115 . 50
Patricia B . Held Transcription 70 . 00
Clerk of Court State Attorney Costs 2 . 00
Diane Matouske , Clerk State Attorney Costs 3 . 00
Patricia B . Held Transcription 416 . 50
Terry Senical Transcription 287 . 00
Michael J . Kessler , Esq . Public Defender Conflict 11 , 421 . 00
Steve Kerby State Attorney Costs 96 . 87
Berta B . H . Bauchman Court Interpreter 80 . 00
Berta B . H . Bauchman Court Interpreter 40 . 00
Berta B . H . Bauchman Court Interpreter 40 . 00
Maria Barrow Court Interpreter 60 . 00
Maria Barrow Court Interpreter 40 . 00
Maria Barrow Court Interpreter 40 . 00
Select Legal Support , Inc Public Defender Conflicts 941 . 98
Alma Rosa Barajas Court Interpreter 40 . 00
James G . Harpring , Esq .Public Defender Conflicts 20860 . 00
Gerald T. Roden , Esq .Indigent Dependency Case 2 , 155 . 00
Language Services , Inc . Court Interpreter 600 . 00
Alma Rosa Barajas Court Interpreter 50 . 00
James G . Harpring , Esq .Public Defender Conflicts 4 , 845 . 00
Berta B . H . Bauchman Court Interpreter 380 . 00
Linda Seymour Transcription 59 . 50
Linda Seymour Transcription 91 . 00
October 16 , 2001
27
r J 0
Madge A. Bradford TranscriptionLindaSeymourTranscription 157 . 50
Sheila A. Flinn Transcription 140 . 00
Treasure Coast Court Report Transcription 262 . 50
Patricia B . Held Transcription 73 . 00
Patricia B . Held Transcription 56 . 00
Patricia B . Held Transcription 63 . 00
Patricia B . Held Transcription 45 . 50
Patricia B . Held Transcription 122 - 50
Hammond & Smith , P .A. Indigent Dependent Cases 31
224 . 00
American Reporting Transcription
y 28 , 850 . 00
James T. Long , Esq . Public Defender Conflicts ( 11 )
52 . 50
Medical Record Services State Attorney Costs
6600 . 00
ABC Printing Public Defender Costs
16 . 03
Suncoast Counseling Clinical Evaluation 35 . 60
Kenneth L . Director, M . D . Public Defender Costs
662 . 50
Marsha Ewing , Clerk State Attorney Costs
2 - 00
James C . Watkins , Clerk State Attorney Costs
2 . 00
Unishippers State Attorney Costs
10 . 68
Michael Heisey , Esq . Public Defender Costs
13 . 14
Unishippers State Attorney Costs
8 . 70
Stone 's Transportation Witness Coordination 17 . 04
Pegasus Travel Witness Coordination 55 . 00
Frank Varnado Witness Coordination
409 . 75
Svetlana Montgomery State Attorney Costs
240 . 72
American Reporting Transcription 475 . 00
Linda Seymour Transcription 27 . 00
Celeste L. Hartsfield 38 . 50Transcription
21 . 00CelesteL . Hartsfield Transcription
49 . 00BarbaraG . Scho PP Transcription
210 . 00PatriciaB . Held Transcription
American Reporting Transcription 220 . 50
Berta B . H . Bauchman 342 . 00CourtInterpreter
Alma Rosa Barjas Court Interpreter
40 . 00
Clerk of the Court50 . 00StateAttorneyCostsScottEllis , Clerk of Court State Attorney Costs
7 . 00
Medical Record Services State Attorney Costs
9 . 00
Cherry Kelly Transcription 14 . 14
Myra A . Eldridge 45 . 509Transcription
115 . 50WuesthoffReferenceLabStateAttorneyCostsMedicalRecordServices300 . 00PublicDefenderCosts23 . 49FedPetrilla , Ph . D . Clinical EvaluationBertaBauchmanCourtInterpreter 500 . 00
Berta Bauchman 40 . 00CourtInterpreter
40 . 00DianneMatousek , Clerk State Attorney Costs 13 . 00MarshaEwing , Clerk State Attorney Costs 13 . 00SuncoastCounselingClinicalEvaluation662 . 50JamesT. Long , Esq . Public Defender Conflicts 900 . 00Total
67, 615 . 14
NO ACTION REQUIRED OR TAKEN .
October 16 , 2001
28
B u t
7. H.Margo Stanford Developer 's AgreementAmendment - 9th Place
and 9th Street Water Main
The Roard reviewed a Memorandum of October 3 , 2001 :
0 rX ,
DATE : OCTOBER 03 , 2001
T0 : JANLES E . CHANDLER
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
FROM:W. ERIK OLSO
DIRECTOR OF
PREPARED AARON J . BOWLES , P .E .
AND STAFFED ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEER
BY : INDIAN RIVER COUNTY UTILITIES
SUBJECT : 9T" PLACE AND 9T" STREET WATER MAIN
DEVELOPER ' S AGREEMENT ANIENDMENT
BACKGROUND
On March 20, 2001 , the Board of County Commissioners authorized professional services for the
design, permitting and construction services with Margo Stanford. (See Attachment-A) The subject
Developer' s Agreement was initiated to abandon the 2" water mains located in easements behind properties
located on 9h Place and 9`s Street. The Utilities Department has since recognized the need for abandonment
of a similar 2" water main located one block south, behind the properties located on the north side of 8 `s
Place. The Utilities Department recommends that this water main be replaced with a 6" water main in the 8 's
Place right-of-way as was done with the other 2 " water mains. This replacement will provide both fire flow
and better access for meter readers. Note that this is the last remaining 2 " water main located in the general
vicinity . See Attachment B for a layout of the proposed additions.
ANALYSIS
The original Developer ' s Ageement between Margo Stanford and Indian River County was for
66 , 869 . 10 . The additional costs requested within the Amendment equal $ 50 , 559 . 00 . The total amended
contract, inclusive of the original contract and the amendment, will equal $ 117 ,428 . 10 . Margo Stanford
has been paid $48 , 530 . 00 from the original contract amount of $66 , 869 . 10 for utility work performed to
date . The work performed to date includes design, permitting and construction services . The remainder
of the project, inclusive of 8 `h Place , if approved, is anticipated to be constructed within the next couple of
months . At that time, the remainder of the fees , inclusive of the Amendment, can be paid.
RECONIAtENDATION
The staff of the Department of Utility Services recommends that the Board of County Commissioners
approve the attached request for an Amendment of the subject Developer ' s Agreement.
LIST OF ATTACHMENTS :
Attachment-A : Margo Stanford Developer' s Agreement approved by the Board of County
Commissioners on March 20 , 2001
Attachment-B : Amendment to Margo Stanford Developer' s Agreement and Cost Estimate for 8 `
Place Improvements
October 16 , 2001
29
3
ON MOTION by Commissioner Macht, SECONDED BY Vice
Chairman Stanbridge , the Board unanimously 4 - 0 ,
Commissioner Adams absent) approved the amendment to the
Margo Stanford Developer ' s Agreement, as recommended in
the memorandum .
AMENDMENT IS ON FILE
IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
7. L Resolution No. 2001 - 104 - Release of Easement at 454 21st
Place SE. Lot 7, Block 8 , Vero Shores Subdivision , Unit 1 )
Requested by Mary Gerardi
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of September 28 , 2001 :
TO : James E . Chandler
County Administrator
DER NT HEAD CONCUR CE :DER
M . Keating, AICP
Community Development Dire for
THROUGH : Roland M. DeBjoieAICP
Chief, Environmental Planning
Code Enforcement
FROM : Kelly Zedek
Code Enforcement Officer
DATE : 9/28/01
RE : MARY GERARDI REQUEST FOR RELEASE OF EASEMENT AT
454 21ST PL SE (VERO SHORES SUBDIVISION)
It is requested that the data herein presented be given formal consideration by the Board of County
Commissioners at its regular meeting of October 16 , 2001 .
October 16 , 2001
30
Bd'
DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS
The County has been petitioned by Mary Gerardi , owner of a lot at 454 21st Place S . E . , for release
of a drainage and utility easement . The easement release is requested because a drainage culvert on
the lot was inadvertently placed along the opposite ( west) property line , outside of the existing
east) drainage easement ( see attached memorandum) . As such , the applicant is working with
county engineering staff to replace the existing easement with a new easement at the location of the
drainage culvert. In any event, the existing easement proposed for release is serving no public
purpose .
ALTERNATIVES AND ANALYSIS
The request has been reviewed by Bell South Communications ; Florida Power & Light Corporation ;
T . C .I . Cable Corporation ; the Indian River County Utilities Department; the County Road & Bridge
and Engineering Divisions ; and the County surveyor . None of the reviewing agencies object to the
proposed release of easement . Therefore , it is staff' s position that the requested easement release
would have no adverse impact to utilities being supplied to the subject properties or to other
properties .
RECONINIENDATION
Staff recommends that the Board , through adoption of the attached resolution, release the drainage
and utility easement, as more particularly described in said resolution .
ATTACHMENTS
1 .9/4/01 memorandum from county engineering staff advising of misplaced culvert
2 .Proposed County Resolution Abandoning Easement
3 .Map (s) depicting easement proposed for release
ON MOTION by Commissioner Macht, SECONDED BY Vice
Chairman Stanbridge , the Board unanimously 4 - 0 ,
Commissioner Adams absent) adopted Resolution No . 2001 -
104 releasing an easement on Lot 7 , Block 8 , Vero Shores
Subdivision Unit 1 .
October 16 , 2001
31
li cl iJ a U U
RESOLUTION NO . 2001 - 104
A RESOLUTION OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, RELEASING
AN EASEMENT ON LOT 7, BLOCK 8, VERO SHORES SUBDIVISION
UNIT 1
WHEREAS, Indian River County has an interest in a drainage and utility easement on Lot
7 , Block 8 , of Vero Shores Subdivision Unit l ; and
WHEREAS, the retention of the easement, as described below, serves no public purpose ;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of Indian
River County, Florida that :
This release of easement is executed by Indian River County, a political subdivision of the State
of Florida, whose mailing address is 1840 25th Street, Vero Beach , Florida 32960 , Grantor, to
GERARDI, MARY
453 21 ST SE PL
VERO BEACH, FL 32962
her successors in interest, heirs and assigns, as Grantee, as follows :
Indian River County does hereby release and abandon all right, title, and interest that it may
have in the following described easement(s) :
the east 10 feet of Lot 7, Block 8, according to the plat of Vero Shores Subdivision, Unit
One, as recorded in Plat Book S, Page 52 of the Public Records of Indian River County, Florida.
THIS RESOLUTION was moved for adoption by Commissioner Macht seconded
by Commissioner Stanbridge and adopted on the 16th day of
October 2001 , by the following vote :
Commissioner Caroline D . Ginn Aye
Commissioner Ruth Stanbridge A_ r, e
Commissioner Kenneth R. Macht Ave
Commissioner John W . Tippin Aye
Commissioner Fran B . Adams Absent
The Chairman declared the resolution duly passed and adopted this 16th day ofOctober
12001 .
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
By
CarolineChai an
Attested By . X2; t; c ...
STATE OF FLORIDA Deputy ClerkCOUNTYOFINDIANRIVER
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 16th day of October20015byCAROLINED . GINN , as Chairman of the Board of County Commissioners of Indian
October 16 , 2001
32
r ^
rl r0U
River County, Florida, and by PAT: rJCd'A M . RIDCELY , Deputy Clerk for JEFFREY K .
BARTON, Clerk of the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida, who are
personally known to me .
NOTARY PUBLIC
RETA M SMITH
JC+
MY COMMISSION # CC 964415
Printed/Name : Cc77/g c..l JY/ / / r/ iEQF
apo
EXPIRES: Sep 20. 20 }1
Commission No . :1 -MO-3-NOTARY FLNOWrYService & BonOing, Inc.
Commission Expiration :
BOAT CHANNEL 100 Wide )
30 0 is 30 60
go ,
t I
t
j IN FEET )
LOT 61 inch = 30 ft.
OT 8
ERO SHORES SUBDIVI ( A
BLOCK 8 LEGAL DESCRIPTION
The East 10 feet of Lot 7 , Block 8 ,
LOT 7 I according to the plat of Vero Shores
Subdivision , Unit One , as recorded in
Plat Book 5 , Page 52 of the Public
Records of Indian River County , Florida .
Now lying in Indian River County , Florida .
I
W
I
o
l N
I
I
I
I m
I a
I
I
I
I 3v
90 '
0
1
CERTIFICATION 21ST PLACE S. E. 70 ' R/W) o
r
I , Charles A. Cramer , hereby certify that I am a registered Professional Surveyor and Mapper licensed to practice in
the state of Florida , that this sketch was made under my immediate supervision , and that it is accurate and correct .
I further certify that this sketch meets the Minimum Technical standards as described in Chapter 61G17 of the Florida 1z
Admi istrotive Code , pursuant to F . S . Chapter 472 .
30
Z. 7 Zoo I a
Charles A. Cramer , P . S . M . Reg . # 4094 ate THIS IS NOT A SURVEY a
Indian River County Surveyor SKETCH TO ACCOMPANY LEGAL DESCRIPTION
1840 25th Street , Vero Beach , FL 32960
561 ) 567 - 8000 PREPARED FOR INDIAN RIVER COUNTY ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT561
October 16 , 2001
33
111
bl i I «7 U J L
7. J. Bid #4017 - Annual Bid for Sulfuric Acid 98 % Utilities Dept
Kemiron , Inc
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of September 25 , 2001 :
DATE : September 25 , 2001
TO : BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
THRU : James E . Chandler, County Administrator
fi
Thomas Frame, General Services Director
FROM : Fran Powell , Purchasing Manager
SUBJECT : Bid Award : IRC #4017 Annual Bid for Sulfuric Acid 98 %
Utilities Department
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
Bid Opening Date : September 13 , 2001 at 2 : 00 P . M.
Advertising Dates : August 23 and 30 , 2001
Broadcast on DemandStar to : Two Hundred Sixty Six ( 266) Vendors notified
Specification Requested by : Twelve ( 12) Vendors
Replies :Six (6 ) Vendors
BID TABULATION
Vendor Sulfuric Acid , 98 % Total Bid
Kemiron Inc 65 , 000 gallons 0 . 3379 / gallon
Lawrence, KS
SATCO 65 , 000 gallons 0 . 35 / gallon
Tampa, FL
Transammonia Inc 65 , 000 gallons 0 . 36207 / gallon
Tampa, FL
Vopak USA Inc 65 , 000 gallons 0 . 436 / gallon
Pom ano Beach, FL
Brenntag Mid - South 65 , 000 gallons 0 . 436 / gallon
Orlando , FL
Allied Universal Corp . 65 , 000 gallons 0 . 499 / ;anon
Miami , FL
October 16 , 2001
34
r; r :
bl
If
I 3
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends awarding this bid as follows :
Award to Kerniron , Inc. as the lowest and most responsive bidder meeting the specifications
as set forth in the Invitation to Bid .
Establish an Open End Contract for the period October 1 , 2001 through September 30, 2002
with recommended vendor . Last years expenditures totaled $ 35 , 000 . 00 The new year bid
prices reflect a 40% savings against the 1993 prices of Bid 9 9009 , which is due a change in
the requirements for the concentration of the sulfuric acid . The projected expenditures for
2001 are $ 21 , 900 . 00_
Authorize the Purchasing Manager to renew this contract for two ( 2 ) additional one ( 1 ) year
periods subject to satisfactory performance, zero cost increase , vendor acceptance and the
determination that renewal of this annual contract is in the best interest of the County .
ON MOTION by Commissioner Macht , SECONDED BY Vice
Chairman Stanbridge , the Board unanimously 4 - 0 ,
Commissioner Adams absent) awarded Bid # 4017 to Kemiron ,
Inc . ; authorized establishment of an open end contract for the
period October 1 , 2001 through September 30 , 2002 with
Kemiron for projected expenditures in the amount of $ 21 , 900 ;
and authorized the Purchasing Manager to renew this contract
for two (2 ) additional one ( 1 ) year periods subject to satisfactory
performance , zero cost increase, vendor acceptance and the
determination that renewal of this annual contract is in the best
interest of the County, as recommended in the memorandum .
7. K. Bid #4009 - Annual Bid for Pest Control Services - Buildings
and Grounds Division - Reject/Re- advertise
Lr
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of October 5 , 2001 :
October 16 , 2001
35
DATE : October 5 , 2001
TO : BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
THRU : James E . Chandler, County Administrator
99
Thomas Frame , General Services Directorccr
FROM : Fran Powell , Purchasing Manager
SUBJECT : Bid Award : IRC # 4009 Annual Bid for Pest Control Services
Buildings & Grounds Division
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
Bid Opening Date : August 23 , 2001 at 2 : 00 P . M .
Advertising Dates : August 9 and 15 , 2001
Broadcast on DemandStar to : Five Hundred Thirty Six ( 536 ) Vendors
Specification Requested by : Three ( 3 ) Vendors
Replies :One ( 1 ) Vendors
BID TABULATION
Bidder ' s Name Annual Amount
Massey Services , Inc . (d . b . a. Preventech )
127036 . 00
Boca Raton , FL
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends rejecting the sole bid received and readvertise this bid in an effort to obtain
more competitive prices for comparison . This bid reflects a 25 % increase against the 1999 prices
of Bid # 7001 .
ON MOTION by Commissioner Macht , SECONDED BY Vice
Chairman Stanbridge , the Board unanimously 4 - 0 ,
Commissioner Adams absent) rejected the sole bid received and
authorized re - advertising this bid in an effort to obtain more
competitive prices for comparison , as recommended in the
memorandum .
October 16 , 2001
36
Elf
7. L . Bid #4008 - Annual Bid or Hydrofluosilicic Acid Utilities
Dept. - Allied Universal Corporation
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of October 5 , 2001 :
DATE : October 5 , 2001
TO : BOARD OF COUNTY CONIMISSIONERS
THROUGH : James E . Chandler , County Administrator
c
Thomas Frame , General Services Director
I
FROM : Fran Powell , Purchasing Manager
SUBJECT : Bid Award : IRC # 4005 Annual Bid for I-Iydrofluosilicic Acid
Utilities Department
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
Bid Opening Date : August 23 , 2001 at 2 : 00 P . M.
Advertising Dates : August 9 & 15 , 200 t
Broadcast on DemandStar to : Two Hundred Sixty Six (266 ) Vendors notified
Specification Requested by : Nine ( 9 ) Vendors
Replies :Two ( 2 ) Vendors
BID TABULATION
Vendor Item Estimated Quantitv Unit Cost
Allied Universal Corporation Hydrofluosilicic Acid ,
44 , 000 lbs .0 . 100 / lb .
Miami 23 - 25 %
JCI Jones Chemicals , Inc . Hydrofluosilicic Acid ,
447000 lbs . 0 . 4469 / lb .
Ft Lauderdale , FL 23 -257o
RECONINLENDATION
Staff recommends awarding this bid as follows :
Award to Allied Universal Corp . as the lowest and most responsive bidder meeting the
specifications as set forth in the Invitation to Bid.
Establish an Open End Contract for the period October 1 , 2001 through September 30 , 2002
with recommended vendor. The projected expenditures for 2001 are $4 , 400 . 00 _ NOTE : This
is the first time that this chemical has been put out to bid .
Authorize the Purchasing Manager to renew this contract for two (2 ) additional one ( 1 ) year
periods subject to satisfactory performance , zero cost increase , vendor acceptance and the
determination that renewal of this annual contract is in the best interest of the County .
October 16 , 2001
37
Lit u0b
ON MOTION by Commissioner Macht, SECONDED BY Vice
Chairman Stanbridge, the Board unanimously 4 - 0 ,
Commissioner Adams absent) awarded Bid # 4008 to Allied
Universal Corp . ; authorized an open end contract be established
for the period October 1 , 2001 through September 30 , 2002 with
this vendor ; and authorized the Purchasing Manager to renew
this contract for two (2 ) additional one ( 1 ) year periods subject
to satisfactory performance , zero cost increase , vendor
acceptance and the determination that renewal of this annual
contract is in the best interest of the County, as recommended
in the memorandum .
Z. M. Bid #4019 - Annual Bid for Liquid Aluminum Sulfate Utilities
Dept. - General Chemical Corporation
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of October 1 , 2001 :
DATE : October 1 , 2001
TO : BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
THROUGH : James E . Chandler, County Administrator
Thomas Frame, General Services Director L °/
FROM : Fran Powell , Purchasing Manager ,,
SUBJECT: Bid Award : IRC # 4019 Annual Bid for Liquid Aluminum Sulfate
Utilities Department
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
Bid Opening Date -0September 14 , 2001 at 2 : 00 P . M .
Advertising Dates August 23 and 30 , 2001
Broadcast on DemandStar to Two Hundred Sixty Eight ( 268 ) Vendors notified
Specification Requested by : Twelve ( 12) Vendors
Replies : Four (4) Vendors
October 16 , 2001
38
E,KDpro 807
BID TABULATION
Vendor Product EstimatedUnit Price
Quantity
General Chemical Corp Liquid Aluminum Sulfate (Liquid
25 , 500 gal 0 . 459 /gal
Paris any , NJ Alum) , Commercial Grade
Kemiron Companies Inc Liquid Aluminum Sulfate (Liquid 25 , 500 gal
Lawrence, KS Alum ) , Commercial Grade
0 . 505 / gal
Southern Ionics Inc Liquid Aluminum Sulfate (Liquid 25 , 500 gal
0 . 679 /gal
West Point , NIS Alum ) , Commercial Grade
Brenntag Mid- South Liquid Aluminum Sulfate (Liquid 25 , 500 gal
Orlando , FL Alum) , Commercial Grade 1 . 38 / gal
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends awarding this bid as follows :
Award to General Chemical Corporation as the lowest and most responsive bidder meeting
the specifications as set forth in the Invitation to Bid .
Establish an Open End Contract for the period October 1 , 2001 through September 30 , 2002
with recommended vendor. Last years expenditures totaled $ 20 , 000 . 00 The new year bid
prices reflect a 28% saving against the 1997 prices of Bid # 8016 . The projected expenditures
for 2001 are $ l 1 , 700 . 00
Authorize the Purchasing Manager to renew this contract for two ( 2 ) additional one ( 1 ) year
periods subject to satisfactory performance, zero cost increase, vendor acceptance and the
determination that renewal of this annual contract is in the best interest of the County .
ON MOTION by C01nmissioner Macht, SECONDED BY Vice
Chairman Stanbridge , the Board unanimously 4 - 0 ,
Commissioner Adams absent) awarded Bid # 4019 to General
Chemical Corporation ; Corp . ; authorized an open end contract
be established for the period October 1 , 2001 through
September 30 , 2002 with this vendor with projected
expenditures of $ 11 , 700 for the year ;and authorized the
Purchasing Manager to renew this contract for two 2 )
additional one 1 ) year periods subject to satisfactory
October 16 , 2001
39
r.t r
performance , zero cost increase , vendor acceptance and the
determination that renewal of this annual contract is in the best
interest of the County , as recommended in the memorandum .
Z. A. Bid #4010 - Annual Bid or Asphalt Paving and Resur acing
Public Works/Road & Bridge Dickerson Florida, Inc. , Ranger
Construction Industries, Inc and Community Asphalt CoW
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of October 10 , 2001 :
DATE : October 10 , 2001
TO : BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
THRU : James E . Chandler, County Administrator
l
Thomas Frame , General Services Director_ de /
FROM : Fran Powell , Purchasing Man ager
SUBJECT : Bid Award : IRC #4010 Annual Bid for Asphalt Paving and Resurfacing
Public Works Department / Road and Bridge Division
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
Bid Opening Date : September 5 , 2001 at 2 : 00 P . M .
Advertising Dates : August 15 & 22 , 2001
Broadcast on DemandStar to : Four Hundred Ninety Four (494) Vendors notified
Specification Requested by : Eleven ( 11 ) Vendors
Replies : Three (3 ) Vendors
BID TABULATION
SEE ATTACHED BID TABULATION
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends awarding this bid as follows :
Award Items # I through 8 to Dickerson Florida, Inc. as the lowest and most responsive
bidder meeting the specifications as set forth in the Invitation to Bid. In addition , make a
multiple award for Item # 9 (County to pick- up S -III Asphalt Concrete) to the following
vendors : Dickerson Florida, Inc. ; Ranger Construction Industries, Inc. ; and Community
Asphalt Corp. and the authorizing staff to purchase material based on availability .
October 16 , 2001
40
r, ll C; n;^
Establish an Open End Contract for the period October 1 , 2001 through September 30 , 2002Withrecommendedvendor. Last years expenditures totaled $ 686 , 900 . 00 . The new year bidPricesreflecta3 % increase against the 2000 prices of Bid # 3for2001are $ 920 , 000 . 00 . 017 . The projected expenditures
Authorize the Purchasing Manager to renew this contract for two (2) additional one ( 1 ) yearperiodssubjecttosatisfactoryperformance , zero cost increase , vendor acceptance and thedeterminationthatrenewalofthisannualcontractisinthebestinterestoftheCounty .
ON MOTION by Commissioner Macht, SECONDED BY Vice
Chairman Stanbridge , the Board unanimously 4 - 0 ,
Commissioner Adams absent) awarded items # 1 - 8 to Dickerson
Florida,Inc .and made a multiple award for item # 9 to
Dickerson Florida, Inc . , Ranger Construction Industries , Inc . ,
and Community Asphalt Corp . ; authorized open end contracts
be established for the period October 1 , 2001 through
September 30 , 2002 with these vendors with projected
expenditures of $ 920 , 000 for the year ; and authorized the
Purchasing Manager to renew these contracts for two (2 )
additional one 1 ) year periods subject to satisfactory
performance , zero cost increase , vendor acceptance and the
determination that renewal of this annual contract is in the best
interest of the County , as recommended in the memorandum .
7. 0. Floodplain Cut and Fill Balance Waiver for Island View
Residential Development - Requested by Carter Associates Inc. for
Island View Properties
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of October 5 , 2001 :
October 16 , 2001
41
Gl u
f tl" .... me. f ,YlniSi`n. v... 5 J n. . e. ... r . . f . . rSj Aeo'-`f _ .• 4 Y,yy ^T
Sr„.,
A.rv,..n F.,: <grte`«^. 4 X. x: . r :.,.. eE r s, es• u..z,. . . . xF... ,-.4,`rc A rvb ..,.. . m. . s. ,x
e* . F eX' iza` , : .• . - xr, w{'E ' .. va. s k`u -k a < X, f, d E., ",
a. a - x . x t :.: tu—`; aux:• '-.a.rt-K ,y a u. , * .', ru w,z s
4 x v't ,. . .,, ' .. a.' µ ,--: ` .. t. a s..r; z s 7J. a r• c a w5rw.a t r
a'> r..a:', •5 r o'r3 ac . .. s., :.,
y. 5 3 r3' m-h,.ha i y xa C,.? c.
ay,-'
x`.
a`. T.: ."is iyy.. Y 51 ,: a i. . ati n r E-i# : "rri'+
TO : James Chandler, County Administrator
THROUGH : James W . Davis , P . E . , Public Works DirecCONSENT AGENDA
AND
Christopher J . Kafer, Jr. , P . E . , County Engineer
FROM : David A. Hays , Civil Engineer
SUBJECT : Request for Floodplain Cut and Fill Balance Waiver for Island View
Residential Development
REFERENCE : SD-01 - 07 - 12 / LDP Application No . 2001030063 -27347
DATE : October 5 , 2001
DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS
Carter Associates, Inc . , on behalf of Island View Properties , the developer of Island View Planned
Residential Development is requesting a waiver of the cut and fill balance requirement of Section
930 . 07(2)(d) of the Stormwater Management and Flood Protection Ordinance . The project is located
on the west bank of the Indian River Lagoon just north of 97`r Lane . The site is located in special
flood hazard area Zone AE with base flood elevations of 8 , 9 , and 10 feet N. G. V .D . The ten year
still water elevation is 4 . 6 feet . The proposed displacement of the floodplain below 4 . 6 feet for
which the waiver is requested is 33 , 900 cubic yards as indicated in the attached letter from the
applicant ' s engineer dated September 11 , 2001 . t
ALTERNATIVES AND ANALYSIS
The project meets the cut and fill balance waiver criteria provided in Section 930. 07 (2)(d) I of being
situated in an estuarine environment within the 100 year floodplain along the Indian River and in
staff' s opinion it appears that all other Stormwater Management and Flood Protection Ordinance t
requirements can be met without adverse impact on other lands in the estuarine environment .
A separate request for a Land Development Permit has been received by the Public Works
Department .
Alternative No. 1
t
Approve the cut and fill balance waiver request.
Alternative No . 2 x
Deny the waiver request and require re-design to accomplish an on- site balance of cut and
fill .
RECOMMENDATIONS
Staff recommends approval of Alternative No . 1 .
ATTACHMENTS
1 .Letter from Carter Associates , Inc . dated September 11 , 2001 .
October 16 , 2001
42
UAtm
a s x ro a - ,
r..3yY` a: 3..kth„.ac Fr fix ` . s'"< . < a."? a r
f v c, qn.x ,. z, . , . t u T 3 P r ,a'i :. S'.¢Cn<,y €.' s * ,
e:`'
9
q 5
Yd..''5n.
hx€.„.
T12r..
ryate„,i"X..
ebk',.
ti_.
y. ”
i c'ice
rY.
t . : >
h<
i:
s'
5aa:
tfs"..,$. - •'.
ry
rr'„,..ry.
w :-
qz•e..;.<
it..`
M,•.:
4'
h
Y.^.
rr::..
r.. #a'. ,,
ra. .w;,
9,
ykzF. .rVi.
ab_.
zv;-,,.
c"^
iK£4l'4b.bw^. .:''?-.,
r,
f..>:.'.
i..',,?:°,z,
T.:.':.
L•
J.^q.'`K E'
4
v^
fk,-'
k.'`.
a.,.r
r,'
1..`.
5,.
r:.
w,.:,.
S2.rv':.:.-,:
P..s,*^k'
ru^+,. "
rx
S`'
L
r'
c
n..-.:.'3:.:
ry,
au',
v
Sr
S#i... ',. .'
a...>,
kt
m'.
7'f'
vs
t,cF,'v#',
ia..,:»:
r..
rro;
z.
r..:.
s.,,',."
a-+.
yer<•
r+
v
cwsr} Y...Y... :...:.
a
l"ic s`
4F;,`'+: ..
Ytl:.'.:
tn'x`:.
i.,,::r.
ti.:,- r,"',°
a`.
s'ra`;
s.
1.
k.
F,.
h.
is,,e„
f>:',.
a.,rvw..
sF. "arf''
c`,
krF.t
axr•
ws...yr.:....,.:..,a,'..
S.m„.?:,.
at xta,£
jr:.fry">.
d¢'
x",:
F. .''.-'
3-'
3.
d"+
F'
z .,
3,
i1:.3
x. fwa rk sR"
u w A ,3:;,. ' s c. .. r,.ae. 4 ` ^ ,:. ,.t l s< a5 v Y+ .:: r. 4 e u. , : . .,, i ^ , . 3av4[ a'' m .,<_ '.p: 4.r
Z k,..m
1:' .•:b .
Y. " i£ 4. 0 4
WE ,Y t s143wa wz , , x'1a" ` . .fx... 5 . .. ., ,
z , . .
s ,
m.3.- ..p-3 a... a xz *„r r.. .;5. .. w ,'tm9 w a x x "'k a : ,. . 3 ,C', x. , . , . s.,. C nFt
3. ... E , a, 1. or f al.,. . r. .. «;>. . H .... . .,.. , t t.. i" ,. an ro, L x , , -v F .. -.. s. . x,. - u, T*t 7x.,,, x:A .r a ,. . . ,.. s , m .<. . +:? s....a iix. o dm. p[,c _")f,.. , dspa.h^ . ,. . r r .,xti. e r. a n„ ss n x r ::...« r. ,. J` . 5 . • L 5 r1 1. . vs s,. , .,.1f
vl'. . . z-' v -.. -. . k .w k _ .. ..w x', wx.,,.h x v;7-t _ . ,.... € i,T ,h z sl 3;x.,Ai7.. x s - . + rry, c. v x , T" `Y+ til s'€ , m.
L
a ti.. .e - i3, z7• ,,.. r s,ri'
a.,".b ,`p'fa++"*"xu-ri"e:.,. T b.z ,
Ytr a. ,r 4 ?`r•„a,. . . .c -7sv .,s ;
S- e s,Sv" yi:, t y.3;. ' ., ,e. r. `n '', '.- z fx '' r
i'4, t e> v 3'•"h cam t s z ;?+F_ a t"x d *"Y r
ON MOTION by Commissioner Macht, SECONDED BY Vice
Chairman Stanbridge, the Board unanimously 4 - 0 ,
Commissioner Adams absent) approved the cut and fill balance
waiver request (Alternative No .1 ) , as recommended in the
memorandum .
ZX Fischer-Sebastian River Conservation Area Drainagle
Easements Granted by Board to the Fischer Lake Island Property
Owner 's Association as Required for State Cost Share
Reimbursement
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of October 10 , 2001 :
TO : James E . Chandler
County Administrator
DEP TMENT HEAD CONCURRENCE :
Robert M. Keating, AIC
Community Development Direct • r
FROM : Roland M .
DeBII
ICPP
Chief, Environmental Planning
DATE : October 10 , 2001
SUBJECT : Request for Board to Grant Drainage Easements on the Fischer-Sebastian River
Conservation Area, to the Fischer Lake Island Property Owner ' s Association, as
Required for State Cost-Share Reimbursement
It is requested that the information presented herein be given formal consideration by the Board of
County Commissioners at its regular meeting of October 16, 2001 .
DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS
The Board of County Commissioners, at a public hearing on March 19 , 1996 , approved county purchase
of the — 95 acre "Fischer - Sebastian River Conservation Area " using environmental land bond funds . The
property is located on the east and west shorelines of the south prong of the St . Sebastian River, north of
C .R. 512 (see attached map) . The County closed the purchase in January 1997 , under the premise that it
will proceed to obtain cost- share reimbursement under the State Conservation and Recreation Lands
October 16 , 2001
43
1 pp
woo b
x
s r1i
r'./.`;.
s'+
a'
x">>.
d.
v.
F1"k.
6„*,
Y.
944rtv
w."
fi,''.
t
a.
w`
J.:.
r>
r,
yRe..:>,.
r,....:..:... ..., '.
r ,?
r.. .;,
rr. ."
r.*...w'-...
a« ..
3".,
Y
uj,".•1..
s`
a'<
ns.'.:.."..',,.f.
r., . .».>.
s:
N•..
eti.>.4,x.<.,`...fa.
v'.
qp3`.
s,.'
x,,
rs„
vry.',u:
s`,,
aS,. . ..,
3.
x” '°
z,, '
a`
vt'.
Y
5v..,.
i; •e_:'1 ,...
ax..
1n.
s<'
c
fi"
2.
n
roxx.`
ewn.,^
7,
v
o-:.„,..
E`.,
B....,cS,”.,.'..
r_
c,
5:,
k_
1,?
xtes+
b,;
r;
k"
Mh
Y.
x}-<`
sf
iky5 rPj.`.'"
N'.
rS.:..
z.,;,.:
v..
z.
r`-,.
xz,•s6:.w7n,
e.
s''
R;
sre=
s'S
SE.at.
n<-tF,.a.
faw`'.'.
tk*
e,-€>
Xf,•xdax.rk''
C^...>.,.
Lv....
t.
x,
tzmfs',..:.
l;..:.:...•
x•
yE...`.
f:..,.,..
r'
y
rfiy.:°..
w±.
wt`'
374rr>
5ixxn
ry.
Ff..,
vT-
R>
4
r
K+
v,k
S'sr:"Eax;
4ii.`..-..'.....<24:.. '
su4k'
t9m4 y4<
yrr,$,,
t,.
4;
s.
7.
x.
5{,,..
k
cz,
r:..,.},.
s..
xy:','
rrc.
et:'
s::
ff^,.
i..
v,_.,,
h
r.
rf„,=
xs`>s9. .
v.
E.t_xa.„.
f..v.€.^,..+?.,.
rtTb'+..
x,
S,,
l#,
afS.,..
ai`.,....,;
y.
r-,<
a:,,._.,,....
t.:
T.r$}
t:'^'
a';
ut.
r.
v•
X
Y?
w-
v"
vt§sY< .-•
nxm',_•
k<-.''>-
w:
rx.
v,-„
fi=.:
r,',
xf,
5
x. .fi
t
xviai
A
x<.r,
awwtf,”,
x„:.
r
t,
rAa..-...°..::;.;......
ag.
r;;.!-
t.
dd••'”+.
Y'
Gk^'`
y.".
vk`,
tt7'.#,
o.
p•
f
5..
y.
rd.`,,
a,.,.,.,.;
e
tE^ .
w
M,
RT..
ucru,
aa.
aw,,'tStd,:-
E,.''
r`
me^.
s.
s'
rZqn
t<,,
m'`..
D,.$',
f`,,..^+,ex`
hS,..:.!.*'
S'.
x>;,.
f^;.
z:,'.
s'
4f
S.
2,,tt.sx
r"
3',,#,.<.'
m`#.
v?Ia"'3.>..
Y".
t,,
o-:..
4fr1".`<
r.':;
3"
e.':'.,'':,-
1-
u
a4ra"
x
4d`°•..
ms^sTnrxL..%xr;
s>
F,"
a_`',#
e'
l'*'..*'.
w,~i,
fa,
G
rx3-
N,..
Ss:
3,
r,.:>
n"
yi3ra_`'N*'
a.":,,.'.;
Ark,
a
v'
ias..
5`,
S.'>+'
3-
x,-+,
Xz,,a'-.''.
wnr.*
t.
Fd.;:€..
w.
ex..
c,
t..._.a',
kt..;.,
cr.-«&.a<.,,
rt
a i s.,r., s . , .R`:s ,,.-..mow „ » .n. £s.,-, ..t, . -,w .,_$ v.. .>f. • ,:, a .., x :: , ,.; ar^ U... t , i;,.S r9ss,,...1?„+.,,:.. t.,Yr. aic.a..a; a"'. t ...,:." .b,.,-`r... er » t,..v.+,*:a, s .. .-,.,t. ., ,
x 1_.
e
F: rr t d< a :,.:
s... . f r .. kr.. : . . < Nv. , a . .. i 3 x.. _.xs. vr `F.,r ,.. 'r # r•-.:..,. .. >3 ? . ,,. .3.+ rr 5 r
x .,.. e -..':, s Y ,: ,.., . . t t,Y : e MC9 .. rx.. .. . 2 w,J.,rz%. ...
v'd s. Z, - . . P. ,SY4 f X:n.r.< k. v h . .: Y ro.:, x v : .>' „ z iS a' :"C,v k . . ,... n :., rx? • ,.: .b AiY, n. ,e ,. 2 i , . .=1 n
f
x+
sFF :.,'m,R .Y`s;t. .. v fir•' F e. -qe
y rfe.,=... d^+, 1 r ,„ . r33:i. Y4. ,;f `s
s ri"'. „ :,. &4y 4 Wiz,.", 4a "r' n... v t- 3a ''k s't.; .• JE` v„'x, y r .
ea
51:4 rt. +- : I e _ u'w' r
rY3by
M" rhr .
5
1
3
fi
CARL) program. On April 3 , 2001 , the Board approved an amended Option Agreement for County sale
of the Fischer-St. Sebastian River property to the Board of Trustees of the Internal Improvement Trust
Fund (BTIITF) at a price of $476 ,240 , and authorized staff to take steps as necessary to close the sale .
Since that time, county staff has coordinated with staff of the Division of State Lands (DSL) to complete
due diligence ' activities (i . e . , survey, environmental site assessment, title insurance) to facilitate closing
of sale of the property to the State . During that process , it was determined that Fischer Lake Island
Subdivision, a residential development adjacent to the conservation area on the west-side of the St.
Sebastian River, has two drainage outfalls leading into the conservation area . Fischer Lake Island is a
private subdivision located in the City of Sebastian that was approved under the City ' s regulatory
purview . State staff has concluded that the drainage outfalls are acceptable , provided the County
dedicates two drainage easements on the conservation area property to the Fischer Lake Island Property
Owner ' s Association (POA) prior to selling the property to the State .
As such, the attached drainage easement dedication document is presented for the Board ' s approval
consideration .
ANALYSIS
The two drainage outfalls into the conservation area follow drainage- ways that existed prior to
development of Fischer Lake Island Subdivision . Notwithstanding, the developer of Fischer Lake Island
Henry Fischer and Sons) has agreed to modify the outfalls to be emergency overflow outfalls , such that
drainage into the conservation area will occur only in rare storm events . The proposed drainage
easements are limited in scope, and will allow areas immediately adjacent to the outfalls to be
periodically maintained by the Fischer Lake Island POA, as necessary . County and State staff have 11
concluded that the outfalls and easement maintenance areas will have no adverse impacts to resources of
the conservation area or to water quality in the St. Sebastian River.
The County has essentially two alternatives . The first alternative is for the County not to dedicate the
easements, which will stall and possibly prevent closing with the State . The second alternative is for the
County to approve the easements , proceed with closing of the sale to the State , and receive the cost-share
reimbursement .
RECOMMENDATION :1 .
Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners approve the attached easement dedication
document and authorize the Board Chairman to execute the document. Moreover, staff recommends that
the Board authorize county staff to take actions as necessary to finalize closing of the sale .
ATTACHMENTS :
z 'y
1 .Map of the Fischer-Sebastian River property
2 .Depiction of proposed easements
3 .Proposed Easement dedication document
t ,
October 16 , 2001
44
1 P 1 3
Wd.,x'. . . se" r
t<;.. g f-+ z .35.1' + r ;'-r•.. 3 x r M* ' xw' Lwe
t t r rt c w :. ;: ::# r F 'a. ., L^ to rt ,.xx
rt,
3<.{pz3.i ,t s,:,au S e'. "r"`x shy *##,, Sv,, r ::;' 1 „. , ' 3
a z e _, , Y i 1 ar ... .,,-n x 5;. .. Y r .. .-$ of ;•, t Ts z w .:.,a W n. c f . ,, .:r S w r l
xti,... va' b kN e i`” " +sudv:rt:+„ a'n'e+*ha du`.&Hc ,..,.re, v3b y r"a3 .w .. aY,. t , ,s e . < ,Iva , ,.v,tF , s< a, . ”, . Ym:. x i'si"'a 5 „'r a.t,y1<-w .k _ Yk'S; ,€ ..,. .nt.s"}„*"i i, r Sa.x,xa a..r fe ,.,. » , ,., rz3,... .z .. > v
54 Y»r . `
b " P : .M1r yt . : t k r i ,, .F F i J i
r..i .. t r : . . G. ' as .:••; . ' k a z.=;x. k r`s v U»•: k x at w v 7 P'R x:.
vx
tet r, , . c. v ate . ft .. .,< va.. > a ;?.„:.,, s n 4 <5b::. . e.+.•,c as , c. s. .. : t "f r . :, v3 -f,. .- n r s ,., r , p v , X
C u, ,• K fi. PBr,, ,..-..s GT„v. n a' 'a:+
myzrnsh vS+F.""t.;x'`+ °t
ON MOTION by Commissioner Macht, SECONDED BY Vice
Chairman Stanbridge , the Board unanimously 4 - 0 ,
Commissioner Adams absent) approved the Easement
Dedication and authorized the Chairman to execute same and
authorized staff to take actions as necessary to finalize closing
of the sale , as recommended in the memorandum .
COPY OF RECORDED DRAINAGE EASEMENT IS ON FILE
IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
9A PUBLIC HEARING LOCAL LAW ENFORCEMENT
BLOCK GRANT LLEBG ) 2001 PROGRAM YEAR REVIEW
PROPOSED SPENDING PLAN SHERIFF ' S OFFICE
Item deferred to Friday , October 19 , 2001 , at 2 : 00 p . m .
9 . As2 . PUBLIC HEARING — ORDINANCE NOS . 2001 - 024 AND 2001 -
025 THOMAS So HAMMOND ' S REQUEST TO AMEND THE
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TO REDESIGNATE ± 10 ACRES FROM M- 2
TO C /I AND TO REZONE THOSE ± 10 ACRES FROM RS - 6 TO IL
Leg; islativ_e)
PROOF OF PUBLICATION OF ADVERTISEMENT FOR HEARING
IS ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
Community Development Director Robert M . Keating reviewed the procedure for
the adoption of a Comprehensive Plan amendment . He asked that each speaker at the next
October 16 , 2001
45
SK
k
a At AYE o.
F t gS1
F3k"fr ax ..c3t', t r s . Y. a 2 s'! r. . +77777Z-404-yt. 4 r .
a "''fie S w t_ ,. S e rf .t<~. i . - rTx »., Y t a x: n c :t
i
r b 2at£
k"1121,12,, x:,a
Ne", X x. rw
41iI . o:t a a y a 5 i., i x s'., L # ', s e ih
e a ro ry "'3' rc :u:"'F.a.,. xl¢. , . ,3' TY 'vS :i,. £ . 3+k, :.' . r' ,..'- r• yr t.F. ..f.:1 t
a. .. 'S Xr .f„ ..:fin a c r..K '"• t f r r is E;.r.. x`; + .
tPh •:x ,}" x
f b . f+, X, '" J?., 3
a e..
t-x y; x' a^ f„ <.S, w'•. sv 5',eA` a,= :ri<. v ' f X"r i A y« z, y <,z. , 3 , -."3!i a €... :3 h S Y L i Re ti• i7 re '. f
k'. , n . , . .+,,.y . .'„b c....,i ,rs hTP. »:.51' :a S`,a ah k t . . xve c*e .uC'',P.`"A 'S+ C m: t , ,. . x: x4ra . r^ s%r, , e ;, ,
v .
r, :"§, ,... . . x ...
4. _
rak t; ,. •in . «` .,.3t .; x a
Fk ^, xr
t 35rY ana. a it ss ` :fiF v-c.:..; s . y'. t: f r s x9. xA`- d's ,=•Y '" s 'ai '. X xa ,
t . n k3 t w. a:'9 . +s ei ,. . S. xx . .:..,,
yy a. .*,,:.. i ,,_ra.,.. =.il: , r, e k r ., o:.. e . z a a 3 ro ` a:...a'°+{e.W, 4 . C.f+ Sl - . . x , r?u! , .l:.:r 0,... x r..; ., r r . v 4 , x .:,k Y x 3 rvw;. ,.x »x "ryF
YS' w.t;: vh nv, s' S. . v 4
s C
x , dS in . ,,. t < .-vn=x '5,. .`.: y; r 4 r xc ' a a '"a t u. 5v f . :_'r J a.'s .." * . w.r ry.a . n 3. . . T . . , ,. , §4 ..s a f r. f , '_ e i x. f a 7 -.U..
o , e.. e , a , +
33 .! sa s^. . .,...r r ,: r -_.., q.. r .. , r , t .. .,e= f x. k r s ?* tj t
z,., "t C, +W'. `x4ka+,
st,+'>
mw ,. u aY't9. . .`5 k ,.,_ n ,,`x i
n„”
1 x rw, m Z , d s::r rs, 6 a rv3 3'ak<. f. W4 i + y„ „ibk*T . ".. `sf , "tir` . z^ ay;.,
nm''
c S 3 :,
g,t"
v",f; g','y" '''ro zl,e T y..x e ,
five public hearings state their name , address , and ZIP code because the State Legislature
has established a new procedure which requires that each local government forward that
information for each speaker in a land use matter to the Department of Community Affairs .
The purpose of this disclosure assures that each speaker will be notified of the case ' s
disposition .He then reviewed a Memorandum of October 3 , 2001 using a Power Point®
outline . (A copy of this presentation has been placed with the backup for the meeting in the
Office of the Clerk to the Board . )
TO : James E . Chandler
County Administrator
D 2ARIIENT HEAD CONCURRENCE
Robert M . Keating, IC
Community Development Dir ctor
THROUGH : Sasan Rohani , AICP
Chief, Long-Range Planning
FROM : John WachtelAll
Senior Planner, Long- Range Planning
DATE : October 3 , 2001
RE : Thomas S . Hammond ' s Request to Amend the Comprehensive Plan to
Redesignate ±10 acres from M-2 to CA and to Rezone those ±10 acres from RS-6
to IL .
PLAN AMENDMENT NUMBER : LUDA 2001 - 01 - 0217
It is requested that the data herein presented be given formal consideration by the Board of County
Commissioners at its regular meeting of October 16 , 2001 -
DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS
This request is to amend the Comprehensive Plan to redesignate ± 10 acres from M - 2 , Medium-
Density Residential-2 ( up to 10 units/acre ) , to C/I , Commercial/Industrial ; and to rezone those ± 10
acres from RS - 6 , Single - Family Residential District ( up to 6 units/acre ) , to IL, Light Industrial
District. Depicted in Figures 1 and 2 , the subject property is located ±950 feet east of 43 `d Avenue ,
on the south side of 41 ” Street. The purpose of this request is to secure the zoning district necessary
to allow the expansion of the industrial park located south of the site .
October 1692001
46
PG 8 15
77117 Ifsl
ky7n
v
c ¢
r3
p-Ja.
K":;::
r.
t-^--.°
xc°xydsa
r '
ir.
sa>._
fi
a 3..`.:{
eh*"tfh
r`
4s 4.'
x:
rry,:'"
iadt"
ssk
t`
da"t 'ss\e n;
r„
r,
s,%{,-;-..`
P.'4g-,
c.
@4ar``
iyat,"",T..:."'z> x?
yy'
S^
Fvt ,
73`S&,s+.
2,S2,
y<
5`{4'.,
xx : :
x' e_
x°
sm
ii7
a.
na. #
3 C,
i
J:: „i x' ys e `='Fra.: . C s_9'P x .. . .. • 3a x yy , gx.. M ns s5 a tx 'a. ,r=zs a a ., , s c e Y-,2 r " t r?y x
r.... ) a t > 2J' l . i a x
Iv,
m- 1
x n
s
y 3,` x
a b Y
yak s x _ 3 t e, Y`
r =: . ;
s t z n v ,
ss h .l:.,c.+ ( .
F” , `' .:+F,,ACa , < .., ,.m aH
y:
n'd' e.^ b', rN ,. .,. ,rte- ry z , . ..r, i
t`$ r 5' :;4rv. , . "tws t a M n,.. . s..T r , . .: 4
J, Y' . -, >G :+, i'Y r ..r.f
5,,3 b . . .'x`. r,. e :':S l. . 1, . . rtr,..3 .. c, ,'.i:,l ` v e._J iN`... k'L+= ^r "r
w,,. qg,..+ :F;r : ^ :.. . 4+ rr`. . 4.,. 1 st :.,. x xs .; a s v s 'n_ '.. li ,, a res t is : - t
i'.
r +N S fi 1"^ ,s '3i' h;, k a ca 5 t . b ar s n s" t k
Figure 1 : Location and Land Use Designation of the Subject Property
M5
I
Own
Own
na
Min
r
UM . y
i
b i
AL
in
nilaML .
0
s 41st ee WON
1; OIL
p £
PS<
UluPUBTHU
I
I
III 4J y
r I
C
I
vnon
In.
MM
r)
i
Y•
L L
r
U I
Vero Eeaeh City Limits
n
T
71215
I
i i
Vero Beach City Limits
1
October 16 , 2001
47
LID ru
o-
4 Yya yj` r3 '
uz
nirz'
R"
i t, rfz b kir« afr '
au
jam{ y,,,srr , xa ^r4 , k
x
i h
Y w F, ;• *a k
vY
a7"'-;.+r'w,'` .,e.P:C 'vy krs ti-' >i L4"5p'tis3""4 3`asc ) iv:' r, t,41
J' , k s,<..,"'x3,. 5^,. `Y?4w , p.'ia: 3 s i. '''S^
5 -'max Nxa m a Y y Y z m a Y iGr 3
r z }.' w+ i. 1 j 5'
xr
a ., •>` 4 `^`Y4 «' 'u
rt t - ,., ?, ' r s.
s e c"` r t :- n x
4f. :.,y, Y T Y rz4 ^Y v,
r 4 ?c
leyr n?' S r wa?,.'5,
To--. t x 1 t y '
S m, r r , ,
r$'„-.. n+ e'„;`-S">Se€ff s,.-G. a, .. . r,':: 'Ve ,vs s -o ^ ,., , a , s. . , s v , o ra d..... n* .C:a-.r , . ."a >" - rtas ,- ., . . moi -x
rs+. 6 3AYrt xlN .fit k . 1 ) a yu'ki2 x
a
x;rY Wyk"' jr,5"4::x Y? k 2.
F Ma"Ti4` zp. s f1 td -.3 x s
r:,a 1 r r e t s . .. 2 t f x ..:.
3v S d
P
y
Figure 2 : Location and Zoning of the Subject Property
I pr 1
Y.
d R 0 :"3
v
a y r
f ILLRS _ fi r
s -
Sam
etq 4
TRllI TRl
w
w o u I
U uu
MiI
i
oft M QJ
e,
I
Vero Beach City Limits R
I F
I
I
I
Ir Vero Beach City Limits I
I
October 16 , 2001
48
BK i I G* 817
q3
77777777E e
riu, Rs.4 ,'Ty„fi,} -, „
y x
s s k 3 t x i
T sFtt+'wT fax y( k Lt'n T'
A '".
8 .Y-
J i
A'
n Yep. ' r^
t." 1 4 1z. ry k f"` 4 t ? r$ it f
Sti
2.xv L S'S" t
nt77
n 2. r 7 5 Az
2
ar a x
c q
1r"
c •t " x,
s
s-.s. . Y. 4
F.
r"'m, J,". :: ,n q 77,.>y x :, " d m r a.y r.n < a„ . '"'`t. u!yr d o, 5. ? x- y, ;.
a. x zf•. 4'=,3s.ISs x r i ` . a ` txt 3 } 1 '"c } l. ' x . ..£ s.m. F x MMT S er1.. v. y .f sry v«`r'5,... . .. 9. PMr„"fs"* R
r
s,r .. Xa,.. Y N '3 x;.. ,. . C :x,.. ,w Y , l 3,:..fi L.h .h' .< x.' sv, . z s r^ . ^wf .±.: r d t; :,.k' a . ;+v
x,+a ,,.. .a. t,. T'4 ;. :, . :r. , 5 y/<' .1..y. . y ,i. x . ,v„ rw z Y x. .. .•x }. .- i'._. a 3 . n»- i4s'-. ``'
ix
e a -. r
a. k d . ab .. syx, ,
nis e. r bv:. '^\f .. . Y,x . T" i i ., W, .. .., s .
4s-•. ,. . , , ,h,, .,..?n_ ,.u ff4 a.:nt },D ks '.: ,i4fir'3
YRx 'S,k a` 1,. +,.. # };... yY ='"•.", e 'r .<f r *r+nl 'fl' 9.l'Y J=
n . rY S 3.. DS'k`Mr Fad 6 F. , h#
Past Actions
On April 51 20017 the Planning and Zoning Commission voted 7 to 0 to recommend that the Board
Of County Commissioners approve the proposed land use designation amendment. On May 17 ,2001 , the Professional Services Advisory Committee voted 9 to 0 recommend that the Board of
County Commissioners approve the proposed amendment and rezoning . On May 22 , 2001 , the
Board of County Commissioners voted 4 to 0 to transmit the proposed land use designation
amendment request to the Florida Department of Community Affairs (DCA) for its review .
ORC Report
Consistent with state regulations , DCA reviewed the proposed amendment and prepared anObjections , Recommendations and Comments ( ORC) Report (dated August 17 , 2001 ) , which
2001 . The DCA ORC Report, Attachment 8 at the end of thisplanningstaffreceivedonAugust20 ,
staff report, does not contain any objections or comments relating to the proposed amendment .
Existing Land Use Pattern
Both the subject property , and land to the north and northwest , across 41 " Street, are zoned RS- 6 and
consist of citrus groves . Northeast of the subject property , on the north side of 41 " Street, land is
zoned R.NI- 10 , Multiple - Family Residential District ( up to 10 units/acre) , and contains single - familyresidences , a multiple - family complex , and a Church .
Land abutting the site on the east is zoned IL and contains a citrusrove and packinghouse . Land
abutting the site on the south is also zoned IL . That land containsbthe Gateway Center IndustrialSubdivision .
To the southwest of the subject property , land is within the City of Vero Beach . That land , zoned
ALI- A2 , Airport Light Industrial-A2 , consists of large wooded areas . Portions of the ALI-A2 district
east of the site , although not adjacent to the site , contain environmentally important xeric scrub and
prime aquifer recharge areas . For that reason , the City is studying what, if any , uses should be
allowed within that district.
Land abutting the subject site on the west is zoned RS - 6 and contains the Indian River CountySheriffsAdministrationComplexandtheCountyJail .
Future Land Use Pattern
The subject property and land to the north , across 41 " Street, are designated M - 2 , Mediam-DensityResidential-2 , on the county future Land use map . The M - 2 designation permits residential densities
Lip to 10 units/acre . Properties to the east and south of the subject area are designated C/I,
Commercial/Industrial, a land use designation which permits commercial and industrial zoningdistricts . Land to the southwest of the subject site , in the City of Vero Beach , is designated CV ,
Conservation . Land abutting the subject property on the west is designated PUB , Public Facilities .
Environment
The subject property is not designated as environmentally important nor environmentally sensitive
by the Comprehensive Plan . No wetlands nor native upland plant communities exist on site . The t
site is not within a 100 year floodplain .
October 16 , 2001
49
ID
k
xd ru pm". f br. 'n iz Ste £. " k "xy< ti. . § ` '"
r-s"%, r
e ± a=:.' em. rz z ,.;
S _ f J . ' f 1..' . . 5 ^"5Y' '9-' Gv a , .. ,..-r nt'r . '
n { nJ "3.d S
x . r,fr ;-1, ,..t r-:i. e .N F f .. : r +.
x b <,
5 '. rwgx:, 1,., . .„3G;,.x,. x :...,, . + a { ,.-.... . t, 1: r a .c: ., n ': ,. Gut v'= } f4Caw2k.J a . , .: i e
q
h .fin` C` y,.. ,r ) '?, f e.,57. . . s ±F+ . x rx»< i. . y v,wif+.,. .a . <. . x n Gn aT
e.^..., i ,u Y, rs4 L >, t <. t w.. t . ,.2hrF
j
k::x9^
c s, , r .: xR , ;' ., rt v ', z sr.., ,,., i tae y3Y a} . d. r 6 . .:: r 5-r a.-L..;.t rr . '. 'J,x ::. . a r,Y t.'?. n hr 3t"t k---.
p
a- a3 x4»,.do 5 .x1
a`3t J w rti^ ' 2y_ . •r
r ...x, x`y^J`z. r T3 r.,,., v ,
Ir. 1 ; r , ... K r5:a:5'., 't- ,} ,4+.
gaz
f4
x$i.: .z r'4 . - . ., rt-: . :+`. r"?. y r.. S:<.c. r . x 't. •i i. a:"
T ,
w "F en l`
s
is ' x i? x *tr s: x l`f K dir
5 - '. i K .X k '1 t 4 . :wy 'ct F , -_:' ^i r:.rf ,r t- rt;::'t M < z e A t .0 k.+.S 'Rr.s+ s r:s,? HIs uJ ) ,ti4.
h Fl$x.x z'axke 9Yr 'w de x., rSt `5+ .'y, , .:N.za
lrt u:. r3
r
4x.
d , . sw
r
um+n3 k.nc.,.e, , :sF r_tfi,.. .. , a,.. s<A.. ..w.. aFx < . ., r ,c z ,. . _ ,. ., , ry ,. . m „" .,... ., e k ::- .,: a At . a< ,: r. . . x :a,'.'k
v±. k a r r„„. tis r. ^ M.. rh` . . .. , Xv^ C f. ia'. 7 ti+x '- we":::s M 1 .
p x1.: S,"+ i s vy rmg
Ja« n ...:y i^.} 3.
a .c._ :h - 5 L. ..., t.k' } . ... ,,,. w.
k:x aS e. SmRr .,. f s 1 a, r s rr 5 a ,.,
x. a tea+ k ... . kd' .. x s ,: .,>„ z iz r ., x . .. v .. . ,a a t tn, x z ry t c. ._ sT kit€`'.rp<. 2rs .. w .r z t 'w:. al X r v S s., x.. r » . 1+r .c . .., a. a. ...v t . xt%t d.... 'Snr.Y, y . s i'
j„
v 5vr.:... 5s .. ....... . .. . . . .. ay.xs ,y+„,s .,». e: . 4 J x r . . t r.. n v ~9„ r k s. .. -.:
ar' "
es AY .e+a"'.n ysih S.0 ht ':4' h. i , ,.a: '? h i „ ::. Y d x . . - xfN1YeS, pr, . v, i .; ef.. , 3 ' '. sa"=ne J . - r m'+
If
u : ? l,,, z M u„ SCS 1 Rad Y 5 r 4 k
IfX ..,.a. n st ..fa,., '9?i J3 '.9' ; 'j Y 't„kpZ
a, .,,.3 s°4c' i m,
t
ry
Utilities and Services
The site is within the Urban Service Area of the county .Centralized potable water service isavailabletothesitefromtheNorthCountyReverseOsmosisPlant. Wastewater service is availabletothesitefromtheCentralCountyWastewaterTreatmentPlant .
Transportation System
Abutting the site on the north is 4151 Street.Classified as an urban minor arterial on the futureroadwaythoroughfareplanmap , 4151 Street is a two lane road . The public road right - of-way widthvariesbetween70feetand100feet . The segment of 41 ” Street that abuts the subject property isprogrammedforimprovementsby2010 .Those improvements include lane widenings and theadditionofcurbs , bicycle lanes , four foot wide shoulders , and five foot wide sidewalks .
The site is bounded on the south by 40`h Street, a two lane local road with 60 feet of public roadright-of- way .
ANALYSIS
In this section , an analysis of the reasonableness of the land use amendment request will bepresented. Specifically , this section will include the following :
Ik an analysis of the proposed amendment ' s impact on public facilities ;
an analysis of the proposed amendment ' s compatibility with surrounding areas ;an analysis of the proposed amendment ' s consistency with the comprehensive plan ; andananalysisoftheproposedamendment ' s potential impact on environmental quality .
Concurrency of Public Facilities
This site is located within the county Urban Service Area , an area deemed suited for urban scaledevelopment . The Comprehensive Plan establishes minimum development standards for :Transportation , Potable Water, Wastewater, Solid Waste, Stormwater Management and RecreationFutureLandUsePolicy3 . 1 ) . The adequate provision of these services is necessary to ensure thecontinuedqualityoflifeenjoyedbythecommunity . The Comprehensive Plan and LandDevelopmentRegulations (LDRs ) require that new development be reviewed to ensure that theminimumacceptablestandardsfortheseservicesandfacilitiesaremaintained .
Policy 3 . 2 of the Future Land Use Element states that no development shall be approved unless itisconsistentwiththeconcurrencymanagementsystemcomponentoftheCapitalImprovementsElement .For Comprehensive Plan amendment and rezoning requests , conditional concurrencyreviewisrequired .
Conditional concurrency review examines the available capacity of each facility with respect to a
proposed project . Since Comprehensive Plan amendment and rezoning requests are not projects ,county regulations call for the concurrency review to be based upon the most intense use of thesubjectpropertybasedupontherequestedlandusedesignation . For commercial/industrialComprehensivePlanamendmentrequests , the most intense use ( according to the county ' s LandDevelopmentRegulations ) is retail commercial with 10 , 000 square feet of gross floor area per acreoflandproposedforredesignation .
October 16 , 2001
50
i i
iy, i r77
xi t i ^+ ."
t
Y a '- + •+e , r:. ,p
x kr x ro k ++w ,+.:"i a-2
i
a', r'*T' . , e.#
ri; x.. Yi 'xE. ds'
t- E+_s k '::: „
r, 'M
x' .,
t :a rs :. s e t1 v..s ro ro
K. as :.t :m,r' r. p 'u t i. Yix
x»t yr ,dv. Ri^,R 1' . 4M
i5a
r o-
vr. , * ' +, k 4:, uic`r`+,afv 57' .'s"`Y<'':.-as5<-m.k''Sf .:.
a3t ..?
a52" " x "
a..xY , .. .. x c z,t r Tom . • ,,... i`.- ''r?k , . . , r w+ 5. r ".t
a. v : .• Vi ,f" h 3 E a yC:. 11':.: a .a u`8.' .:'u n, +r r Ys 4 2
s#xf, xe., r ,.... .s . s «_:v,d r r.. a .e z xF ar r s t
r rx r , ., b . .r sv.. e . ,,.. c r, >.., rx.r . o-r,.r,.l r d n. r rc . z`.
igv
r. a. . X . ., rF r 4:: x x't x, . , , -. Fr . tf. . c"„sv r L. :,,. f . _..k., b, 3 :o.. s i s.,. 4 . -. .i` Y d xNY .. . .. ,.,. s s e <. . e.
III
M1 ,. .
s.a.Y 4F•t xa, s x
Pk . .,.
3 w
WIN
t y .,... . #atF l +, kf,., i , . ,:; x t ,:.:, i x .{:N., . r {
1.
r,
F
r ^.+?'_
k, y .z . x,{b.+3r, r 4; u 1°, m t .
c G i aFw,a aIf
m a a i„t .t. . ' a s. M r z. 5. { Cekl . i-YYzt
a . i:x9rsx, r .,., e..... x E . , APF"?` t 'n'+ a
x
x
r e ,
The site information used for the concurrency analysis is as follows :
1 . Size of Area to be Redesignated : 10 acres
2 . Existing Land Use Designation : M- 2 , Medium -Density Residential -2 ( up to 10
units/acre )
3 . Proposed Land Use Designation : C/l , Commercial/Industrial
4 . Most Intense Use of Subject Property
under Current Land Use Designation : 100 Single - Family Units
5 . Most Intense Use of Subject Property
under Proposed Land Use Designation : 100 , 000 sq . Ft . of Retail Commercial (Shopping
Center in the 6" Edition ITE Manual) .
Transportation
As part of the concurrency review process , the applicant has submitted a Traffic Impact Analysis
TIA ) . The county ' s Traffic Engineering Division has reviewed and approved that TIA . A TIA
reports the number of peak hour/peak season/peak direction trips that would be generated by the
most intense use of the subject property under the proposed land use designation , and assigns those
trips to impacted roads . Impacted roads are defined in section 910 , 09 (4) (b) 3 of the county ' s LDRs
as roadway segments which receive five percent (511c ) or more of the project traffic or fifty (50) or
more project trips , whichever is less .
According to the approved TIA , the existing level of service on impacted roadways would not be
lowered by the traffic generated by development of a 100 , 000 square foot shopping center on the
subject property . Attachment 4 of this staff report contains a more detailed transportation
concurrency analysis .
Water
A retail commercial use of 100 , 000 square feet on the subject property will have a water
consumption rate of 30 Equivalvent Residential Units ( ERU) , or 7 ,500 gallons/day . This is based
upon a level-of- service standard of 250 gallons/ERU/day . Water lines extend to the site from the
North County Reverse Osmosis Plant which currently has a remaining capacity of approximately
1 , 500 , 000 gallons/dav and therefore can accommodate the potable water demand associated with the
proposed amendment .
Wastewater
Based upon the most intense use allowed under the proposed amendment, development of the subject
property will have a wastewater generation rate of approximately 30 Equivalent Residential Units
ERU) , or 7 , 500 gallons/day . The subject property is served by the Central Regional Wastewater
Treatment Plant which has a remaining capacity of approximately 1 , 100 ,000 gallons/day . Therefore ,
the Central Regional Wastewater Treatment Plan can accommodate the additional wastewater
generated by the proposed amendment .
Solid Waste
Solid waste service includes pick- up by private operators and disposal at the county landfill . For a
100 , 000 square foot commercial development on the subject site , solid waste generation will be
October 16 , 2001
51
3
n" , '
arsa
a., a,
11 uz' t. krXs,:. 4, t 5 1 .,.-, f z,.. . . t..x:,,r s x x
t
r F n -% xn t`; 1 a 't ev .a; " a<s^rh ,>
PN
is£ , : .-:: cava 8r"@." ...p. a 'E . . .:,w. 1.. . q k r a . ,
f f 3 x.,.)eY ... n{ . 3<> tt,.k ,k , w ra.X,„ .t`%.r a.. 1.
z,
i rtM '.n , . rr U` v nn
Yad . t`64 ,7 . S . s.:, i' a - k i,n t. e 4 a
r. Sr.? f( ; b rM1. f t`, S.F d ''#{ z
r <:;b Txc'w, k5'”F,. . ;. s, k' J r 'n'{
sC'#r, r ,5 'hn v "4•`',i t.-x ,.: .k
s,...
i s a' s %,`: ,3"` m
r#%{ ,. i
R` rk
n'2eyaa•an vt,, lot s' r ,yx fl sZ. zt ,. . x.
z x' a L t A rti a 1
si r,:..S7>'e
a e , a,. 1. r d !" a 4 Fw t;, n xt,,, 5 p2
N t3 S 1 ., r , m t J t A s tt, 3'*` r'v w .a', .t +r xa ts.. i.'swi?vaakk?;. iF > L w : 4. .,x r r. :vs>s4 r+,., s 3 4 r'. t a" i r,
s
Y f, i::' v -T F <,v L•
s • s s^ - k „. `" , '&'`".'e2~,µ„ r r au.a r t i v L , s'.:re+.4
Na
i .R '§r. r a AP;.. . - . F v"T vx`:: Ysr. s ...eras :t ' . '^x f w c ;. '
11 a '•,.,su, E z 'Nr . . ,," .v 1`s . .,,,, a g, M ''y' 'h, ii*x -,'., , ` a"
1 .'x S,c>
i y '""ry'n"4 a 3,` ` v }, s' iP':
n
a
N
c x '
approximately 500 waste generation units (WGU) annually . A WGU is a Waste Generation Unit
Measurement equivalent to one ton ( 2 , 000 pounds ) of solid waste . Using the accepted conversion
rate of one cubic yard for every 1 , 200 pounds of compacted solid waste generated , the 100 , 000
square feet of commercial development would be expected to generate 833 cubic yards of waste/year.
A review of the solid waste capacity for the active segment of the county landfill indicates the
availability of more than 820, 000 cubic yards . The active segment of the landfill has a three year
capacity , and the landfill has expansion capacity beyond 2010 . Based on the analysis , staff
determined that the county landfill can accommodate the additional solid waste generated by the site
under the proposed land use designation .
Stormwater Management
All developments are reviewed for compliance with county stormwater regulations which require
on -site retention , preservation of floodplain storage and minimum finished floor elevations . In
addition , development proposals must meet the discharge requirements of the county Stormwater
Management Ordinance . Since the site is located within the M- 1 Drainage Basin and the Indian
River Farms Water Control District (IRFWCD ) , development on the property will be prohibited from
discharging any runoff in excess of 2 inches in a 24 hour period, which is the approved IRFWCD
discharge rate .
In this case , the minimum floor elevation level of service standards do not apply , since the property
does not lie within a floodplain . However, both the on-site retention and discharge standards apply .With the most intense use of this site under the proposed amendment, the maximum area of
impervious surface would be approximately 8 . 5 acres . The maximum runoff volume , based on that
amount of impervious surface and the 25 year/24 hour design storm, and given the IRFWCD 2 inch
discharge requirement, would be approximately 321 , 320 cubic feet. In order to maintain the
county ' s adopted level of service, the applicant would be required to retain approximately 239 , 720
cubic feet of runoff on- site. With the soil characteristics of the subject property , it is estimated that
the peak pre -development runoff rate is 35 cubic feet/second .
Based upon the County Engineering Division ' s analysis , the stormwater management level of service
standard would be met by limiting off- site discharge to the IRFWCD ' s maximum discharge rate of
2 inches in 24 hours , and requiring retention of the 239 , 720 cubic feet of runoff for the most intense
use of the property .
As with all development, a more detailed drainage review will be conducted during the development
approval process .
Recreation
Recreation concurrency requirements apply only to residential development . Therefore , this
Comprehensive Plan amendment/rezoning request would not be required to satisfy recreation
concurrency requirements .
Concurrency Summary
Based upon the analysis conducted , staff has determined that all concurrency - mandated facilities ,
including stormwater management, roads , solid waste , wastewater, and water, have adequate
t capacity to accommodate the most intense use of the subject properties under the proposed land use
designation . Therefore , the concurrency test has been satisfied for the subject request .
October 16 , 2001
52
i = 1
r r :
x .p,•'" ' .? $ i."}vY' C` . , Aka ^35Tx v'$' ., ha tiy5sns Y
r :;1
r
1116;11'"e4
x i. Y y., w'4 ta...,, ' ' d. ..vr +q'h r ew x Z .. >... r '` is ., : 7 a T F e rf-` .t '.t
a . rf"%' 3 ' Hrat•-.'. '.a:}"t , ? Tv a'r $ n x r, p^: k y xh, y t. 1 f Y
r rw ,s:.$ 't t` %S'ri... : %' < rc,> r* ars u'+`, ''- 4E'"c Ls N.t t E,:, 3 4 t r k
m a nql C' i.. ;. ...
vr.•x'>
t*'a " . . 'e. ,.. p,,4 kms r-k '. x Y 1 7 sq
e x.. , ;`;,"$ ^i. T.,p4'
a ^a e:`°Ma a a 3`s'; .3m , '?<_•a'. s
wi.. ,.
a. Q. 30v 21
Y t •.h. t b. Fs, 6Y s ,'
ie
x f Aj i 1 +
4jS. ,4S'' ls. l,'r 4 s a i ,. ! , u j t a
t q _,'
fi y ? vM yf b Ar ^+
S x;
n l's -`r'v {'`Y.Y ,t'%.. ,+ ,+`g, ik. 4 1 .s r-, >ti i A J t
tY ? £ q,kC, rv"' . ai5•;, {
tCd t
a
h ,.z ...:x e*. ''Ii
M
3. . :.F &.a?"' 1 Mh` S "-
rC il:S%:
d '1s"`.
i.4 ltiY'
T
n
r:.
Rf+Y.. S
Y a'"
Consistency with Comprehensive Plan
Comprehensive Plan amendment requests are reviewed for consistency with all policies of the
Comprehensive Plan . As per section 800 . 07 ( 1 ) of the County Code, the "Comprehensive Plan may
only be amended in such a way as to preserve the internal consistency of the plan pursuant to Section
163 . 3177 (2)F. S . " Amendments must also show consistency with the overall designation of land uses
as depicted on the Future Land Use Map , which includes agricultural , residential , recreational ,
conservation , and commercial and industrial land uses and their densities .
The goals , objectives and policies are the most important parts of the Comprehensive Plan . Policies
are statements in the plan that identify the actions which the county will take in order to direct the
community ' s development . As courses of action committed to by the county , policies provide thebasisforallcountylanddevelopmentdecisions . While all Comprehensive Plan policies are
important, some have more applicability than others in reviewing plan amendment requests . Of
particular applicability for this request are the following policies :
Future Land Use Policy 14 . 3
The most important policy to consider in evaluating a plan amendment request for consistency with
the county ' s Comprehensive Plan is Future Land Use Element Policy 14 . 3 . This policy requires that
at least one of four criteria be met in order to approve a land use amendment request. These criteria
are :
a mistake in the approved plan ;
an oversight in the approved plan ;
a substantial change in circumstances affecting the subject property ; or
a swap or a reconfiguration of land uses at separate sites .
Staff' s position is that this land use amendment request meets Policy 14 . 3 's third criterion ,
When the current Comprehensive Plan was approved on February 13 , 1990 , the plan assigned
commercial/industrial zoned properties to commercial nodes . These nodes were designated various
sizes to reflect commercial demand and were established in certain areas to incorporate lands deemed
suitable for commercial development . The subject property was considered for inclusion in the node
at that time .
When the comprehensive plan was adopted , the subject property was not included in the node for
the following reasons :
There was already sufficient land designated commercial/industrial to accommodate
projected demand , and
0 Given the size and shape of the subject property , residential development was determined
to be feasible .
For these reasons , staff' s position is that there was no mistake nor oversight in the Comprehensive
Plan .
There have , however, been two changes in circumstances affecting the subject property . The most
t , important change relates to the ± 18 .7 acre tract of land abutting the subject property on the east .
That land was given a residential land use designation and a residential zoning district when the
E :comprehensive plan was adopted in 1990 .
October 16 , 2001
53
Bit i 191 32? 2
r
777-77770x fi
a r' "Yk "" i iz <H'},+ y "* z r r
to -: 4"v X ter' r f z z x r•»f' w ax, t
dr
133•,6 `+ xy .`rtr t F z- s. {x . ! s! i S s
i s h h 7
a
a "`
A
s v' 5'-2d 5 T`v"`" ., "
r.'ti:>x* µ r ,^ v.^"ri"i
r e 1 z
s
y ;G ., Gny`,.'."t
i
IIx `
2""`
t
ia`y/k aT L
1 P fF'.r Ya. .,,:' £.a' x ;t ^'` y^L .t:<f °! 5 -.'X ' a'£ t i
Y x:
x.
M1: f c 3 4 41
t .k
xs 3,r
r''"
k,
a
ih
t t
r r s i
r' i2 "' `. ku p,Y- 1 r r fia i?"
P e`r'v`" F• i} f T .''., r ,k i r r 9 v a
r fars'9' Pr-- „ r '"kvk, rz'
a
ryhu4srd
4tf s. z '
1 If
IlkrnFaa. . x a z
n. le a, M.SE n `i{.,dn•! ,.'b"i r ) ..`. X IfYp
L3'."5' +1... ? ., k.4.> " ' x§ ..,, x 4 f¢'F .9qy _ d X,. p
T e'carr kt l" 'cm _ '41+9 a'y $+ca2 S a* /h- .4v d` ' T+Fi.lr....:'t"
l:
In 1998 , however, the tract east of the subject property was redesignated to C/I and rezoned to CG .
Although the redesignation of adjacent land is seldom justification for additional redesignations , the
1998 redesignation resulted in the subject property having non - residential uses on three sides . Those
non-residential uses are the Sheriff' s Complex and Jail ( institutional ) on the west , an industrial
subdivision (industrial) on the south , and commercially zoned land to east .
Besides redesignation of land to the east of the subject property , there is also another change in
circumstances that substantially impacts the subject property . That change relates to the county ' s
airport zoning regulations (Section 911 . 17) which were adopted , pursuant to Chapters 163 and 333
of the Florida Statutes , on March 18 , 1993 . Those regulations establish a noise impact overlay zone ,
For any residential development within noise impact zones , county regulations mandate that
buildings be constructed in such a way that noise impacts will be mitigated.
1
Because approximately 80 % of the subject property is located within a noise impact zone , these
regulations apply to the site . Consequently , residential construction on the subject property may be
more expensive than residential construction on properties not located within noise impact areas .
Given the current residential land use designation of the site , the most feasible residential
development scenario for the subject property involves lower cost or affordable housing . That is due
to the following factors :
The site is designated for up to 10 units/acre , the county ' s most dense residential land use
designation ;
The site is located in an area of the county with a high proportion of low and very lowincomehouseholds ; and
The site is located near several employment centers that generate a demand for nearby
affordable housing . Those employment centers include The Vero Beach Municipal Airport,
The Sheriff' s Administration/County Jail Complex , Dodgertown , Indian River Memorial
Hospital , the Gifford Commercial/Industrial Node , and the SR 60/58th Avenue
Commercial/Industrial Node .
Even though the added cost associated with development within noise impact zones is not
significant, that cost may be enough to impact the feasibility of an affordable housing project.
Therefore , the adoption of noise impact overlay zones and regulations for development within those
zones constitutes a change in circumstances affecting the subject property .
1 For the above reasons , the subject request is consistent with Future Land Use Policy 14 . 3 .
Future Land Use Policy 1 . 15
This policy defines the areas that are suitable for a commercial/industrial land use designation .
Suitable areas must be within the urban service area and near existing urban centers . The subject
property is within the urban service area and is near several urban centers (e . g . Gifford , the City ofVeroBeach , Dodgertown and the Indian River Mall ) . For those reasons , the subject request is
consistent with Future Land Use Policy 1 . 15 .
i
i
October 16 , 2001 1 .
54
6 { P° G 3, 2
f7 71 17 71jTy {
rr,,
YLi'5'fl 4 p
z
r4
t4 '
M,
N&3'` yh iyRry S XY,,,:.Tsa,k
4 ; `
k"' "
t ""
rr"
r3 p.... r
AIL
k
t
t
1t .ays I F r r £ a`` $ - '
f r o y g f > F n a Y r 5
5 k q T
ILv.Kx°4..:. _,o rr . _h,.. . rvF .„ " .
e , ...Ytu51 ,..i6
S 4§y lyh V" xL „x9,zi F'L' . 'iL '*`F,y 'n's :: x,
y . a k. FS k : t '?r• ` 5#^ » #"sr" Y=' tii. T. s r s 7 r
a F
n, .. .. . . ... v'"t;.. _»F r .... . . .
y.,.,.4..
i> y,- ff.' s. ' uwe 'fwd ,. fm ..,:=-•r`-s fav: .,'`Ai,.z...,+. . .q.y+ s 'a K .,. . gw : . ;;'` $ s.p''?S''W` Y
Future Land Use Policy 1 . 18
Policy 1 . 18 requires that commercial/industrial nodes be located along roads with functionalclassificationsappropriatetothelevelofactivity . Being bordered on the north by 415` Street, anurbanminorarterialroadway , the subject property has adequate access to accommodate anycommercial/industrial uses . Additionally, 41 " Street has the appropriate functional classification andcapacitytoaccommodatetrafficthatmaybegeneratedbyacommerciaUindustriallanduse . Forthosereasons , the subject request is consistent with Future Land Use Policy 1 . 18 .
Future Land Use Policy 1 . 22
Policy 1 . 22 of the Future Land Use Element states that no node should be considered for expansionunless70 %
of the land area (less rights - of- way) is developed , or approved for development, withgnon - aricultural and non-residential uses , unless otherwise warranted .
The intent of Future Land Use Element Policy 1 . 22 is to establish specific criteria for noexpansion . Without such criteria, decisions are often arbitrary and inconsistent. The 70 % standard,then , is a measure of whether a node needs to be expanded . According to the County ' sCommercial/Industrial Data Source , the subject node is 36 % developed .
As stated in Policy 1 . 22 , however, a node that is less than 70 % developed may be considered forexpansionifotherwisewarranted . Policy 1 . 22 states that otherwise warranted may include , " .accommodating a substantial change in circumstances . . . where said change has had the effect ofmakingthepropertyunsuitableforresidentialuse . "
As noted earlier, the 1998 redesignation of land to the east of the subject property was a substantialchangeincircumstancesthathashadtheeffectofmakingthesubjectpropertyunsuitableforresidentialuse . For that reason, the subject request is consistent with Future Land Use Policy 1 . 22 .
Summary of Consistency with the Comprehensive Plan
While the referenced objectives and policies are particularly applicable to this request, otherComprehensiveplanpoliciesandobjectivesalsohaverelevance . For that reason , staff evaluatedthesubjectrequestforconsistencywithallplanpoliciesandobjectives . Based upon that analysis ,staff determined that the request is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan .
Compatibility with the Surrounding Area
Staffs position is that commercial/industrial development on the subject property would result infewerincompatibilitiesthanresidentialdevelopmentonthesite . Because the site is bordered on thesouthandeastbyC/I designated land , the request is for the continuation of an existing land usedesignationpattern .
Residential development on the subject property would be particularly impacted by noise and trafficgeneratedbyadjacentandnearbyusessuchastheairport, the jail , and industrial uses to the southandeast. In contrast to residential development on the site , the industrial and institutional usessurroundingthesubjectpropertywouldhavelittleimpactoncommercialorindustrialdevelopmentonthesubjectproperty . Although site design features such as additional buffering may partiallymitigateimpactsonresidentialprojects , the added costs of those features may render a projectunfeasible . This is especially relevant to affordable and lower cost housing projects which are mostfeasibleforthesubjectproperty .
The primary impacts of CII development on the subject site would be on the residentially designatedParcelstothenorthofthesubjectproperty . Those parcels can be grouped into two areas . The firstareaconsistsofthefoursingle - family houses on approximately 1 acre wooded lots located along the
October 16 , 2001
55
r x
d
xh a i
a m F a rIel
Tt?F Y` ir
e
k
k 1 zx 4,,
r
t
i
ti
JY
t
LI
e
w ;
ro
S
r,e .. a ac a sss y
rq
r . itA;c. v.e".. .. 6 ap„ r?--s`' k 1c 3, y rf #'"x' w; t a§ r ' =etx" I, " F %ate k a:
pE, . v , . r
north side of 41 " Street and east of the subject property ' s east boundary . Any impact on those
r parcels would be somewhat mitigated by the wooded condition of the lots , physical separation
provided by road and canal right- of- way and the site design of the subject property .
The second area of parcels that could be impacted by C/I development on the subject property
consists of the two 20 acre groves directly north of the subject property . That land is large enough
to accommodate any buffers needed to mitigate impacts of development of the subject property .
Another way in which C/I development on the subject property would impact surrounding property
relates to the Sheriffs Department and Jail Complex abutting the site on the west. Development on
the subject property impacts the Sheriffs Department and Jail Complex because the subject property
is the only land that is contiguous to the existing Complex and is available for expansion of the
Complex . For that reason , Planning staff has coordinated with Sheriffs Department staff regarding
this request. The Sheriffs Department staff indicated that they have communicated with the
applicant.
For these reasons , staff feels that CA development on the subject property would be compatible with
surrounding uses .
Potential Impact on Environmental Quality
Staffs position is that, since the subject property contains no environmentally important land , such
as wetlands or sensitive uplands , development of the site is anticipated to have little or no impact
on environmental quality .
CONCLUSION
Based on the analysis , staff has determined that the requested land use designation and requested
zoning district are compatible with the surrounding area, consistent with the goals , objectives , and
policies of the Comprehensive Plan , and meet all applicable concurrency criteria. Finally , the subject
property is located in an area deemed suitable for industrial uses . The request meets all applicable
criteria.
For these reasons , staff supports the request to change the site ' s land use designation and zoningdistrict .
RECOMMENDATION
Based on the analysis conducted , staff and the Planning and Zoning Commission recommend that
the Board of County Commissioners approve the proposed amendment and rezoning by adopting
the attached ordinances .
ATTACHMENTS
1 . Summary Page
2 _ Comprehensive Plan Land Use Designation Amendment Application
3 . Rezoning Application
4 . Detailed Transportation Concurrency Analysis
5 . Approved Minutes of the April 5 , 2001 , Planning and Zoning Cornmission Meeting
6 . Approved Minutes of the May 17 , 2001 , Professional Services Advisory Committee Meeting7 . Approved Minutes of the May 22 , 2001 , Board of County Comrnissioners Meeting
8 . DCA ' s ORC Report
9 . Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Designation Amendment Ordinance
10 _ Rezoning Ordinance
October 16 , 2001
56
l i i U 17
d
S
el
Ile e —
Ice
i
y
S, ti.
IQ
1 77777775e5t t
q 'xy an a Ys r
s
t , r s Y n q r t 6
IfIF,
1
T" 4, N, I If3'"` 'uE ., 1 , x 4 ;... a J h . °x ..T t b x
n., z ..,, .c' E' a-F y4
5 :
The Chairman opened the public hearing and asked if anyone wished to be heard in
this matter .
Bruce Barkett, 756 Beachland Blvd . , Vero Beach , who appeared on behalf of the
applicant, supported staff' s recommendation and advised he was available for questions .
It was determined that no one else wished to be heard and the Chairman closed the
public hearing .
ON MOTION by Commissioner Macht ,SECONDED BY
Commissioner Tippin, the Board unanimously 4 - 0 ,
Commissioner Adams absent) adopted Ordinance No . 2001 -
024 amending the Future Land Use Element of the
Comprehensive Plan by changing the Future Land Use
Designation for ± 10 acres located ± 950 east of 43 d Avenue , on
the south side of 41 " Street ,from M -2 ,Medium Density
Residential 2 up to 10 units / acre ) ,to C /I ,
70 Commercial/Industrial ; and providing severability and effective
date .
ORDINANCE NO . 2001 - 024
AN ORDINANCE OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AMENDING THE FUTURE LAND
USE ELEMENT OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN BY CHANGING THE FUTURE LAND
USE DESIGNATION FOR ± 10 ACRES LOCATED ±950 FEET EAST OF 43RD AVENUE, ON
THE SOUTH SIDE OF 41sT STREET, FROM M- 2 , MEDIUM -DENSITY RESIDENTIAL-2 (UP
TO 10 UNITS/ACRE) , TO C/I , COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL ; AND PROVIDING
SEVERABILITY AND EFFECTIVE DATE .
WHEREAS ,the Board of County Commissioners adopted the Indian River County
October 16 , 2001
57
Bid 0
Ic
Ifa ,
If
If
In If,
If 71
X
1
qf
TI
a
241 VA
o I, . clZa
y-t
ORDINANCE NO . 2001 -024
Comprehensive Plan on February 13 , 1990, and
WHEREAS , the county received comprehensive plan amendment applications during its January
2001 amendment submittal window , and
WHEREAS , the Local Planning Agency held a public hearing on this comprehensive plan
amendment request on April 5 , 2000 , after due public notice , and
WHEREAS , the Local Planning Agency recommended approval of this comprehensive plan
amendment to the Board of County Commissioners , and
WHEREAS , the Board of County Conunissioners of Indian River County held a Transmittal
Public Hearing on May 22 , 2001 , after advertising pursuant to F. S . 163 . 3184( 15 ) (b ) 1 and (c) , and
WHEREAS , the Board of County Commissioners approved the transmittal of this comprehensive
plan amendment to the Florida Department of Community Affairs for their review and comment, and
WHEREAS , the Board of County Commissioners announced at the transmittal public hearing its
intention to hold and advertise a final public hearing at the adoption stage of this plan amendment,
and
WHEREAS , the Florida Department of Community Affairs received this Comprehensive Plan
Amendment on June 11 , 2001 , for the State review pursuant to F. S . 163 . 3184 (4) , and
WHEREAS , Indian River County received the Objections , Recommendations , and Comments
ORC) Report from the Florida Department of Community Affairs on August 20 , 2001 , and
WHEREAS , the ORC Report contained no objections or comments regarding this Comprehensive
Plan Amendment, and
WHEREAS , the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County held a Comprehensive
Plan Amendment Adoption Public Hearing on October 16 , 2001 , after advertising pursuant to
Chapter 163 . 3184 ( 15 ) (b ) 2 and ( c) , FS and Chapter 125 . 66(4) , FS ;
October 16 , 2001
58
r
w "
s y ik
v
F
fell1151
44
If
VV
61
r
If
1 41- 1In
t ,
r
3sua?<s. , .
ORDINANCE NO . 200124
NOW, THEREFORE , BE IT ORDAINED , by the Board of County Commissioners of Indian
River County , Florida, that :
SECTION 1 . Comprehensive Plan Amendment Adoption and Transmittal
The amendment to the Indian River County Comprehensive Plan identified in Section 2 is herebyadopted, and three (3 ) copies are directed to be transmitted to the State of Florida Department ofCommunityAffairsandone ( 1 ) copy is directed to be transmitted to the Treasure Coast RegionalPlanningCouncil .
SECTION 2 . Amendment to the Comprehensive Plan
The land use designation of the following described property situated in Indian River County ,Florida to wit:
THE EAST 10 ACRES OF TRACT 12 OF SECTION 27 , TOWNSHIP 32 SOUTH , RANGE39EASTACCORDIiNGTOTHELASTGENERALPLATOFLANDSOFTHEINDIANRIVERFARMSCOMPANYSUBDIVISIONASRECORDEDINPLATBOOK2 , PAGE25 , PUBLIC RECORDS OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA .
Is changed from M-2 , Medium- Density Residential-2 ( up to 10 units/acre) , to CA , Commercial/Industrial , and the Future Land Use Map is hereby revised accordingly .
SECTION 3 . Repeal of Conflictin , Provisions
All previous ordinances , resolutions , or motions of the Board of County Commissioners of Indian
River County , Florida which conflict with the provisions of this ordinance are hereby repealed to theextentofsuchconflict.
SECTION 4 . Severability
It is declared to be the intent of the Board of County Commissioners that if any provision of this
ordinance and therefore, the Indian River County Comprehensive Plan Amendment is for an reasonfinalyIheldinvalidyandorunconstitutionalbyanycourtofcompetentjurisdiction , such provision shall
be deemed a separate , distinct and independent provision and such holding shall not affect the
validity of the remaining provisions .
SECTION 5 . Effective Date
The effective date of this ordinance , and therefore , this plan amendment, shall be the date a final
order is issued by the Department of CommunityAffairsrs or Administration Commission' finding
amendment in compliance with Section 163 . 3184( 1 ) (b) , Florida Statutes , whichever occurs earlier
No development orders , development permits , or land uses dependent on this amendment may beissuedorcommencebeforeithasbecomeeffective . If a final order of noncompliance is issued bytheAdministrationCommission , this amendment may nevertheless be made effective by adoption
at a public meeting after public notice of a resolution affirming its effective status , a copy of which
resolution shall be sent to the Florida Department of Community Affairs , Division of ResourcePlanningandManagement, Plan Processing Team.
October 16 , 2001
59
sj7177,
8
r
Ifr1 t
a
x, . Y .a4 fi. .vs',rh , 1xa ',,; ia*^ F /'z^v: 4 a y. q d S.
ce .C ti. r
w "
IF
ORDINANCE NO . 2001 - 024
This ordinance was advertised in the Press -Journal on the 3rd
day of October, 2001 , for a public
hearing to be held on the 16`h
day of October, 2001 , at which time it was moved for adoption by
Corrunissioner Macht seconded by Commissioner Ti p p i n and adopted
by the following vote :
Chairman Caroline D . Ginn Aye
Vice- Chairman Ruth M . Stanbridge Aye
Commissioner Fran B . Adams Absent
Commissioner Kenneth R . Macht Aye
Commissioner John W . Tippin Aye
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
BY :
Caroline D . Ginn, Charman
ATTEST BYE C
z Jeffrey K. Barton , Clerk
Acknowledgment by the Department of State of the State of Florida thisab day of DQ+ , 2001 .
Acknowledgment from the Department of State received on this / day of hw, 2001 , at
A .M .and filed in the office of the Clerk of the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River
County , Florida .
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGAL SUFFICIENCY
Inwi Rhy Ca ApprOved
County Attorney Admin
i
Legal
Budgel to
APPROVED AS TO PLANNING MATTERS B°pl• d /0
Risk Mgr.
941 e
Robert M . Keating , ICP ; mmunity Deve pment Director
cd\u\jw\lu\hammond 2001 \lud:: ord. wpd
October 16 , 2001
60
Cl r
rk t F
I- 1 X
fi s
r{
L
4
L i
y L 4
b
x t
e .
12
ON MOTION by Commissioner Tippin , SECONDED BY Vice
Chairman Stanbridge , the Board unanimously 4 - 0 ,
Commissioner Adams absent) adopted Ordinance No . 2001 - 025
amending the Zoning Ordinance and accompanying Zoning
Map from RS - 6 , Single - Family Residential District (up to 6
units acre) , to IL , Light Industrial District, for ± 10 acres located
950 east of 43 `d Avenue on the south side of
415` Street , and
described herein , and providing for effective date .
ORDINANCE NO . 2001 - 025
AN ORDINANCE OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY , FLORIDA . AMENDING THE ZONING
ORDINANCE AND THE ACCOMPANYING ZONING MAP FROM RS - 6 , SINGLE-FAMILY
RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT ( UP TO 6 UNITS/ACRE) , TO IL , LIGHT INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT ,
FOR ± 10 ACRES LOCATED ±950 FEET EAST OF 43 " DAVENUE, ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF
41ST STREET, AND DESCRIBED HEREIN , AND PROVIDING FOR EFFECTIVE DATE .
WHEREAS , the Planning and Zoning Commission , sitting as the local planning agency on
such matters , has held a public hearing and subsequently made a recommendation regarding this
rezoning request ; and
WHEREAS , the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County , Florida, did
publish its Notice of Intent to rezone the hereinafter described property ; and
WHEREAS , the Board of County Commissioners has determined that this rezoning is in
conformance with the Comprehensive Plan of Indian River County ; and
WHEREAS , the Board of County Commissioners has held a public hearing pursuant to this
rezoning request , at which parties in interest and citizens were heard ;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED , by the Board of County Commissioners of Indian
River County , Florida, that the zoning of the following described property situated in Indian River
County , Florida, to- wit:
THE EAST 10 ACRES OF TRACT 12 OF SECTION 27 , TOWNSHIP 32 SOUTH , RANGE 39
EAST ACCORDING TO THE LAST GENERAL PLAT OF LANDS OF THE INDIAN RIVER
FARMS COMPANY SUBDIVISION AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 2 , PAGE 25 , PUBLIC
RECORDS OF ST . LUCIE COUNTY , FLORIDA .
October 16 , 2001
61
LJi 1 j tj U
k
LL
III
tyt
t .
5
ate - 3,. :ci'Shy .r ;
a,, ,
t '+. • r ,: i
ph
R
ORDINANCE NO . 2001 - 025
Is changed from RS- 6, Single-Family Residential District (up to 6 units/acre) , to IL, Light IndustrialDistrict .
All with the meaning and intent as set forth and described in said Land Development Regulations .
Effective Date : This ordinance shall become effective upon the issuance by the State Department
of Community Affairs of a Notice of Intent to find the related Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use
Designation Amendment contained in Ordinance Number 2001 - 024in compliance in accordance
with s . 163 . 3184 (9) or the issuance of a final order by the Administration Commission finding thereferencedamendmentincompliancewiths . 163 . 3184( 10) .
Approved and adopted by the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County , Florida, onthis16 `h day of October, 2001 .
This ordinance was advertised in the Press -Journal on the 3 `d
day of October, 2001 , for a publichearingtobeheldonthe16`h
day of October, 2001 , at which time it was moved for adoption byCommissionerTippinsecondedbyCommissionerStanbridgeandadoptedbythefollowingvote :
Chairman Caroline D . Ginn Aye
Vice- Chairman Ruth M. Stanbridge Aye
Commissioner Fran B . Adams Absent
Corrunissioner Kenneth R . Macht Ave
Commissioner John W. Tippin Ave
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
BY: 4
Caroline D . Ginn , Ch irman
ATTEST BBLD e
Jeffrey K . Barton , Clerk
z4-Acknowledgment by the Department of State of the State of Florida this a day of Oc 2001 .
Acknowledgment from the Department of State received on this 1 day of dss; 2001 , atAM . and filed in the office of the Clerk of the Board of County Commissioners of Indian RiverCounty , Florida.
October 16 , 2001
62
J 1
h
r
t e
h •5 S' C b e
f
3 b y
71 1
E s
i :, ; n r M i sa ,.a 'k 9°;f f
ORDINANCE NO . 2001 - 025
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGAL SUFFICIENCY
11 , 4pav -County Attorney
i
APPROVED AS TO PLANNING MATTERS
Inifim R'w* Ca Approved D21e
Admlrn
Legal
Robert M . teating , AICP Budget 16 /C 0
Community Development Direc or Dev1.
w
Risk Mgr .
cd\u\jw\lu\hammond 2001 \rzon ord . wpd
9 . Ae3e PUBLIC HEARING - ORDINANCE NOS . 2001 - 026 AND 2001 -
027 1 LUTHER GROVES INC . AND FAIRWAYS AT GRAND
HARBOR , LTD , REQUEST TO AMEND THE COMPREHENSIVE
PLAN TO REDESIGNATE ± 15 . 46 ACRES FROM M4 TO C /I AND TO
REZONE THOSE 15 . 46 ACRES FROM RM- 6 TO CG ; AND TO
AMEND THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TO REDESIGNATE ± 16 . 79
ACRES FROM C/I TO M4 AND TO REZONE THOSE ± 16 . 79 ACRES
FROM CL TO RM- 8 (Legislative)
PROOF OF PUBLICATION IS ON FILE
IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
Community Development Director Robert M . Keating reviewed a Memorandum of
October 3 , 2001 while using a Power Point® outline to aid in his presentation ( copy in the
backup file in the Office of the Clerk to the Board) :
October 16 , 2001
63
77
v
If
I , f
If
If
rf
If
If
If III
If
If 11 C
I t t s f fi
F S A 3
9 k t
i v 7 , ; ,» .,. n ., s. bx
3 ' " •-`.`* rn
x U`!:t
s '`, y: ;1' ",-v * P ^ ? ,.x , r$"!x R
5'
9+„ y5 " z.P h" L-0'p v.,
r,4F a. o- a\ b tick `+-.h•
6 .
r,• x4 x. ,r
r
na
3".."
4 '` y ` _ . Y y., e 2tq
TO : James E . Chandler
County Administrator
PAR ENT HEAD CONCURRENCE
Robert M. Keating , AIC
Community Development Dir ctor
THROUGH : Sasan Rohani, AICP
Chief, Long- Range Planning
FROM : John Wachte
Senior Plannonb -Range Planning
DATE : October 3 , 2001
k
RE : J. Luther Groves, Inc. and Fairways at Grand Harbor, Ltd ., Request to Amend
The Comprehensive Plan to Redesignate ±15 .46 Acres From M- 1 to C/1, and to
Rezone Those ±15. 46 Acres from RM- 6 to CG ; And to Amend The
Comprehensive Plan to Redesignate ±16 .79 Acres From C/I to M- 1 and to
Rezone Those ±16.79 Acres From CL to RM- 8
PLAN AMENDMENT NUMBER : LIMA 2001 - 01 - 0220
It is requested that the data herein presented be given formal consideration by the Board of CountyCommissionersatitsregularmeetingofOctober16 , 2001 .
DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS
This is a request to redesignate ± 15 . 46 acres from M- 1 , Medium - Density Residential- 1 (up to 8
units/acre ) to CII, Commercial/Industrial , while simultaneously redesignating a nearby ± 16 .79 acre
tract from C/I to M- 1 . Unlike commerciaUindustrial node expansion requests , the proposed
amendment will not increase the amount of CA designated land and will not increase land use
density/intensity .Rather, this amendment will reconfigure the US 1 ( 57" Street to 49'h Street)
Commercial/Industrial Node .
October 16, 2001
64
033
5T
J
y
a
1777',47 lqqqW 71
1 J h•
F;
1 11 f I
s,,; ri {"s . rr^s;
rte a'ar e yt `; n rs 4 k w. a a c r
F, t' S k fiS sy r e ,R { z srp` 7m hrq }'' r t21, . ,. ,s
Figure 1 : Location and Land Use Designation of Subject Property 1
9
LAKE
i C11 MMI
51
zrc °
1 at
IA m
P g
r4tree
MMI
M = l
Jw d F
i
i - 1r`ti P N,-'.ITM'v W
1 I 11 '
w
MJR90R PLAT 9
m
l vHew s hr aruc rur.
rl
D.
s f•. ' :• /`
7',
C ) l
October 16 , 2001
65
13 i i 1 i b a j
If WWI
r
If I
L I
q4,Yku$
s"
I.)
All
1-4
t4
4
F
ice
a •
f..,
x._
y
1'
L
I
V`
l
1 •
l- -
moi:
O
co
G
b
it
1 •
l` %
1
cdo
N
Ts
1
A
bA
I
4
03,
E
1
f
I
P
CL
ur•
z
41
c
Sy
U
1.Fes.
C
j
4
X
m
d .
Figure 3 : Location and Land Use Designation of Subject Property 2
Ilip
MAND HARBOR FLAr s
P.BL 9-81
WV Ik#ffFM4)KE 311
am'7, t
I
I yll
CA
l
OL
L:1.
F v 1
t fit x Flu+
r i r Q10:tyy ar Qu
rtfLT r ai I'G
J' t o•'' „ ,6 fiat' F`
q 15 i5j r. t
r ,
bsr PL Alkiy it tt `HY,liiµ l
L
I
CIITIPULT 6666,
yl f ilii
i/ m+8f
CA
y
t l L
j n/
October 16 , 2001
67
r
s
77 777777
I
v
F
a e i t A.
77
air - "* s, 'z.¢ S x"' ,.`} k
Oda nh.A'3 X....w . N ^
Figure 4 : Location and Zoning of Subject Property 2
k4, w rwaeoe Fur 9
IF
RM - 6 IN
j
1
1 awr rte-
1 CQF Wif18 fYS SIE
ar!'
1
tYtotRM - 6.
i
d 1 L
S C L r
M,7
r
10
IL ttItt
M j'n
h 'ti
1 itIt
t 1 q lam
IF
FF, am
J Lr
ySKDy i
Y M
RM - 6
October 16 , 2001
68
i ij
Iv
s,
r
77777r7F7!7
J,
The ± 15 . 46 acre property to be redesignated from M- 1 to C/I is depicted on a land use designation
map in Figure 1 , and on a zoning map in Figure 2 . This property is located near the southeast corner
of US 1 and 53 `d Street and will be referred to as Subject Property I . The request involves rezoningSubjectProperty1fromRM- 6 , Multiple - Family Residential District ( up to 6 units/acre) to CG,General Commercial District.
The ± 16 . 79 acre property to be redesignated from C/I to M - 1 is located ± 1 , 550 feet south of 53 `d
Street, on the east side of US 1 . That property will be referred to as Subject Property I . Figures 3and4depictSubjectProperty2onlandusedesignationandzoningmaps , respectively . The requestalsoinvolvesrezoningSubjectProperty2fromCL , Limited Commercial District , to RM- 8 ,Multiple- Family Residential District ( up to 8 units/acre) .
There are two purposes for this request . The first purpose is to allow cornmercial development onSubjectProperty1 . The other purpose of this request is to more accurately reflect the current andfutureusesofSubjectProperty2ontheFutureLandUseMap .
Past Actions
On April 5 , 2001 , the Planning and Zoning Commission voted 7 to 0 to recommend that the Board
of County Commissioners approve the proposed land use designation amendment. On May 17 ,2001 , the Professional Services Advisory Committee voted 7 to 0 recommend that the Board of
County Commissioners approve the proposed amendment and rezoning . On May 22 , 2001 , theBoardofCountyCommissionersvoted4to0totransmittheproposedlandusedesignation
amendment request to the Florida Department of Community Affairs (DCA ) for its review .
ORC Report
Consistent with state regulations , DCA reviewed the proposed amendment and prepared anObjections , Recommendations and Comments ( ORC) Report (dated August 17 , 2001 ) , which
planning staff received on August 20 , 2001 . The DCA ORC Report , Attachment 8 at the end of this
staff report , does not contain any objections or comments relating to the proposed amendment.
Existing Land Use Pattern
There is a mix of uses in this area of the county . The west side of US 1 , between the North Relief
Canal and 49`h Street, contains vacant cleared land, woods , industrial buildings , and a convenience
store at the northwest corner of 53 " Street and US 1 . Except for the convenience store , which is
zoned CG , that land is zoned IL, Light Industrial . The east side of US 1 , between the North Relief
Canal and 53 `d Street , is zoned CG and consists of a driving range . A small ( one - third of an acre)
parcel at the southeast corner of 53rd Street and US 1 is also zoned CG and contains a store .
Land from 53 " Street south to Subject Property 2 , and east of US 1 , (including Subject Property 1 )is zoned RM- 6 . The northern part of that area contains old groves , while the southern part containsawoodedarea .
Subject Property 2 is zoned CL but contains the Fairways multiple - family residential development.Normally , a residential use is permitted only as an accessory use in the CL district . The Fairways ,however, is part of the Grand Harbor Development of Regional Impact ( DRI) . Through thedevelopmentorderoftheGrandHarborDRI , residential developments are permitted on non-residentially designated land within the Grand Harbor DRI Project Area. The rest of the GrandHarborDevelopmentissouthandeastofSubjectProperty2 .
October 16 , 2001
69
4
y
T
Y
fl If If
5If I 4i z y fir T ys rf ^.d r ir i
4 e, *
Future Land Use Pattern
Subject Property 2 and properties between US 1 and Old Dixie Highway are designated C/1 ,Commercial/Industrial , on the county ' s future land use map _ There are two other CA designatedpropertiesinthispartofthecounty : ±0 . 31 acres at the southeast corner of US 1 and 53 `d Street, and
15 acres along the east side of US 1 between the 53 " Street and the North Relief Canal . The C/I
designation permits various commercial and industrial zoning districts . The remaining land east ofUS1andsouthoftheNorthReliefCanal , including Subject Property 1 , is designated M- 1 . The M-1designationpermitsresidentialuseswithdensitiesupto8units/acre .
Environment
Natural state of both sites has been disturbed . Neither site contains any wetlands or other
environmentally sensitive habitat. No flood hazard areas exist on either site .
Utilities and Services
Potable water distribution lines extend along US 1 to both subject sites from the North CountyReverseOsmosisPlant . Wastewater collection lines extend along US 1 from the Central CountyWastewaterTreatmentPlanttoSubjectProperty2 .Wastewater lines are planned to extend toSubjectProperty1soon .
Transportation System
Subject Property 1 abuts US 1 , which is classified as a Rural Principal Arterial roadway on the future
roadway thoroughfare plan map . The segment of US 1 that is adjacent to Subject Property I is a four
lane road with 120 feet of public road right- of- way . Currently , there are no plans to expand this
segment of US 1 .
Subject Property 1 is bounded on the north by 53 `d Street . Classified as an Urban Principal Arterial
Road on the future roadway thoroughfare plan map , the segment of 53 `d Street that is adjacent to
Subject Property I is a two lane road with 120 feet to 150 feet of public road right- of- way .
Indian River Boulevard forms the eastern border of and provides access to Subject Property 2 . That
segment of Indian River Boulevard , classified as an Urban Principal Arterial Road on the future
roadway thoroughfare plan map , is a four lane roadway with 200 feet of public road right-of- way .Currently , there are no plans to expand this segment of Indian River Boulevard .
ANALYSIS
In this section , an analysis of the reasonableness of the application will be presented . Following adiscussionofplanamendmentreviewstandards , this section will include the following :
an analysis of the proposed amendment ' s impact on public facilities ;
an analysis of the proposed amendment ' s compatibility with surrounding areas ;
an analysis of the proposed amendment ' s consistency with the comprehensive plan ; and
an analysis of the proposed amendment ' s potential impact on environmental quality .
Plan Amendment Review Standards
Unlike most land use designation -amendment requests , this request does not involve an increase in
land use intensity . As proposed, the request involves a commercial/industrial node reconfiguration
and a ± 1 . 33 acre decrease in node size , rather than an expansion of a node .
October 16 , 2001
70
1%1 i
For this reason , the subject request can be characterized differently from most plan amendments .
Typically , plan amendments involve increases in allowable density or intensity of development . As
such , the typical amendment would result in impacts to public facilities and changes to land use
patterns . Consequently , both the county comprehensive plan and state policy dictate that a high
standard of review is required for typical plan amendments .This standard of review requires
justification for the proposed change based upon adequate data and analysis .
The subject amendment, however, differs significantly from a typical plan amendment request .
Instead of proposing a density or intensity increase , the subject amendment involves only a locational
shift in future land uses and an overall decrease in land use intensity .
These different types of plan amendments warrant different standards of review . Since the typical
type of amendment can be justified only by challenging the projections , need assessments , and
standards used to prepare the original plan , a high standard of review is justified . For amendments
involving just shifts in land uses and no intensity/density increase , less justification is necessary .
This recognizes that no single land use plan map is correct and that many variations may conform
to accepted land use principles and meet established plan policies .
In fact , in March 1998 , the county amended its comprehensive plan to allow land use designation
swaps . " At that time , Future Land Use Element Policy 14 . 3 was amended to specifically allow
future land use map amendments that do not increase the county ' s overall land use density or
intensity . That change was recommended in the county ' s adopted Evaluation and Appraisal Report
EAR) , which was found sufficient by DCA . EAR based amendments , including that
recommendation , were adopted by the county and found "in compliance " by DCA .
Concurrency of Public Facilities
Both sites comprising this request are located within the County Urban Service Area, an area deemed
suited for urban scale development . The comprehensive plan establishes standards for :
Transportation , Potable Water, Wastewater, Solid Waste , Stormwater Management, and Recreation
Future Land Use Policy 3 . 1 ) . The adequate provision of these services is necessary to ensure the
continued quality of life enjoyed by the community .To ensure that the minimum acceptable
standards for these services and facilities are maintained, the comprehensive plan requires that new
development be reviewed . For land use designation amendment and rezoning requests , this review
is undertaken as part of the conditional concurrency determination application process .
As per section 910 . 07 of the County ' s Land Development Regulations (LDRs ) , conditional
concurrency review examines the available capacity of each facility with respect to a proposed
project. Since land use amendment and rezoning requests are not projects , county regulations call
for the concurrency review to be based upon the most intense use of the subject property based upon
the requested land use designation .
For conunercial/industrial land use amendment requests , the most intense use (according to County
LDRs ) is retail commercial with 10 , 000 square feet of gross floor area per acre of land proposed for
redesignation . The site information used for the concurrency analysis of Subject Property 1 , the
commercial/industrial portion of the proposed amendment, is as follows :
1 . Size of Area to be Redesignated : 15 .46 acres
2 . Existing Land Use Designation : M- 1 , Low-Density Residential - 1 up to 8
units/acre )
October 16 , 2001
71
1.
3 . Most Intense Use with Existing Land Use Designation : 123 units
4 . Proposed Land Use Designation : C/I , Commercial/Industrial
5 . Most Intense Use with Proposed
Land Use Designation : 154 , 600 square feet of Retail Commercial
Shopping Center in the 6 "' Edition ITE Manual) .
For residential land use amendment requests , the most intense use ( according to County LDRs) is
the maximum number of units that could be built on the site , given the size of the property and the
maximum density under the proposed land use designation .The site information used for the
concurrency analysis of Subject Property 2 , the portion of the proposed amendment to be
residentially designated , is as follows :
1 . Size of Area to be Redesignated : 16.79 acres
2 . Existing Land Use Designation : C/l , Commercial/Industrial Node
3 . Most Intense Use with Existing
Land Use Designation : 167 ,900 square feet of Retail Commercial
Shopping Center in the 6" Edition ITE Manual) .
4 . Proposed Land Use Designation : M - 1 , Low-Density Residential - 1 up to 8
units/acre)
5 . Most Intense Use with Proposed Land Use Designation : 134 units
If adopted , the combined maximum development potential of the sites would decrease . The
residential development potential would increase by 11 units , from 123 to 134 . That increase ,
however, is more than offset by the 13 , 300 square foot decrease in the commercial development
potential of the sites . For that reason , the proposed amendment would reduce overall land use
intensity .
As per section 910 . 07 ( 2 ) of the Concurrency Management Chapter of the County ' s LDRs , projects
which do not increase density or intensity of use are exempt from concurrency requirements . This
land use amendment request is exempt from concurrency review because the requested land use
designation changes would decrease the overall development potential and land use intensity that
the sites could accommodate .
It is important to note that there will be no effect on service levels for any public facility as a result
of this land use designation amendment.
As with all projects , a detailed concurrency analysis will be done in conjunction with site
development . That concurrency analysis will address facility service levels and demand .
Compatibility with the Surrounding Area
Subject Property 1
The following factors indicate that commerciallindustrial development on Subject Property 1 would
be compatible with surrounding areas .
October 16 , 2001
72
i1i I i J e
4 f y
The request is for the continuation of the existing Land use designation pattern from the north
and west .
0 The residentially designated property to the east and southeast is under the same ownership
as Subject Property 1 . Only the 208 foot long southern boundary of the site would actually
abut residentially designated land not owned by the applicant .
County land development regulations somewhat mitigate potential impacts through site
design and by requiring commercial/industrial development to provide vegetative buffers .
Property to the south and east is designated M- 1 ( up to 8 units/acre ) , one of the county ' s most
intense residential land use designations . That property , which is zoned RM - 6 , Multiple -
Family Residential District ( up to 6 units/acre) , is currently vacant .
Generally , multiple-family development is more dense than single -family development and
has more flexibility , in terms of site design that could mitigate impacts from adjacent
commercial/industrial development, than single- family development . For those reasons ,
multiple-family projects are more compatible with commercial/industrial uses than single -
family projects , and the RNI - 6 zoning district is an appropriate district for residential land
that abuts commercial/industrial uses .
Subject Property 2
The following factors indicate that a residential land use designation is appropriate for Subject
Property 2 .
Adjacent land to the north and south , and land to the east , across Indian River Boulevard , is
residentially designated ; therefore , the request is for the continuation of the existing land use
designation pattern .
Subject Property 2 is an existing residential development. As part of the larger Grand Harbor
Development of Regional Impact, Subject Property 2 has been planned in coordination with
surrounding areas , to be compatible with surrounding areas .
For these reasons , staff feels that the proposed land use amendment would not increase potential
incompatibilities with surrounding areas .
Consisteney with Comprehensive Plan
Land use amendment and rezoning requests are reviewed for consistency with all policies of the
comprehensive plan . As per section 800 . 07 ( 1 ) of the land development regulations , the
comprehensive plan may only be amended in such a way as to preserve the internal consistency of
the plan pursuant to Section 163 . 3 L77 ( 2 ) , FS . " Amendments must also show consistency with the
overall designation of land uses as depicted on the Future Land Use Map , which includes
agricultural , residential, recreational , conservation , and comnercial and industrial land uses and their
densities .
The goals , objectives and policies are the most important parts of the comprehensive plan . Policies
are statements in the plan which identify actions which the county will take in order to direct the
community ' s development . As courses of action committed to by the county , policies provide the
basis for all county land development related decisions --including plan amendment and rezoning
decisions . While all comprehensive plan objectives and policies are important , some have more
October 16 , 2001
73
9:Sly 2
applicability than others in reviewing plan amendment and rezoning requests . Of particularapplicabilityforthisrequestarethefollowingpolicies .
Future Land Use Element Policy 14 .3
In evaluating a land use amendment request, the most important consideration is Future Land Use
Element Policy 14 . 3 . This policy requires that one of four criteria be met in order to approve a land
use amendment request. These criteria are :
The proposed amendment will correct a mistake in the approved plan ;
The proposed amendment will correct an oversight in the approved plan ;
0 The proposed amendment is warranted based on a substantial change in circumstances
affecting the subject property ; or
The proposed amendment involves a swap or reconfiguration of land use designations at
separate sites , and that swap or reconfiguration will not increase the overall land use densityorintensitydepictedontheFutureLandUseMap .
In this case , the proposed amendment meets the policy ' s fourth criterion. As specifically cited in the
policy , the proposed amendment involves a swap or reconfiguration of land use designations at
separate sites , and that swap or reconfiguration will not increase the overall land use density orintensitydepictedontheFutureLandUseMap . For those reasons , the proposed amendment meets
the fourth criterion of Future Land Use Element Policy 14 . 3 .
Because the proposed amendment meets the policy ' s fourth criterion , the proposed amendment is
consistent with Future Land Use Element Policy 14 . 3 .
Future Land Use Element Policies 1 . 13 and 1 . 14
Future Land Use Element Policies 1 . 13 and 1 . 14 state that the M- 1 , Medium -Density Residential - 1 ,
land use designation should be within the urban service area and is intended for urban and suburban
scale residential development with densities up to 8 units/acre -
Already containing residential development, and located within the urban service area near existingmediumdensityresidentialdevelopment, Subject Property 2 is appropriate for residential
development with a density of up to 8 units/acre . The proposed amendment would allow that type
of medium density residential development on Subject Property 2 . Therefore , the proposed
amendment is consistent with Future Land Use Element Policies 1 . 13 and 1 . 14 .
Future Land Use Element Policy 1 . 15
Future Land Use Element Policy 1 . 15 states that the Commercial/Industrial land use designation
should be within the urban service area, in areas that are suitable for urban scale development and
intensities .
Located at the intersection of two major roads within the urban service area, Subject Property 1 is
appropriate for commercial uses . The proposed amendment would allow commercial development
on Subject Property 1 . Therefore , the proposed amendment is consistent with Future Land Use
Element Policy 1 . 15 .
October 16 , 2001
74
t 1 4J
Future Land Use Element Policv 1 .20
Future Land Use Element Policy 1 . 20 states that nodes shall have a designated size based on the
intended use , service area population , existing land use pattern and other demand characteristics .
The amount of C/I designated land is based on service area population , the existing land use pattern ,
and other demand characteristics . The proposed amendment will not increase the amount of C/I
designated land . Therefore , the proposed amendment is consistent with Future Land Use Element
Policy 1 . 20 ,
Future Land Use Element Policy 1 .22
Future Land Use Element Policy 1 . 22 states that 70 % of the land area of a node should be developed
with non - residential and non- agricultural uses before that node is considered for expansion . The
intent of this policy is to regulate increases in the amount of C/1 designated land . Since the proposed
amendment does not increase in the amount of C/I designated land in the subject node , Future Land
Use Element Policy 1 . 22 ' s 70 % developed standard does not apply to this amendment.
Future Land Use Element Policy 1 .24
Future Land Use Element Policy 1 . 2.4 specifically allows the Board of County Commissioners to
initiate a land use designation amendment to change C/I designated land to residentially designated
land , provided that the following conditions exist :
The parcel has been redesignated to C/1, Cornrnercial/IndLIS trial , since comprehensive plan
adoption on February 13 , 1990 ; and
The parcel is currently designated C11 ; and
More than two years have passed since approval of the ordinance redesignating the parcel
to C/I ; and
No construction activity has commenced on the parcel since approval of the ordinance
redesignatina the parcel to CIL
If the proposed amendment is adopted , and if no construction activity takes place on Subject
Property 1 within the referenced time frames , Policy 1 . 24 would apply and the Board could initiate
an amendment to change Subject Property 1 back to a residential designation .
Summary of Consistency with Comprehensive Plan
As part of the staff analysis , all policies in the comprehensive plan were considered . Based upon that
analysis , staff determined that the proposed land use designation amendment is consistent with the
comprehensive plan .
Potential Impact on Environmental Qualitv
Neither subject property contains wetlands or any other environmentally sensitive habitat . Federal ,
state , and county environmental protection rules regulating impacts on adjacent and nearby
environmentally sensitive lands apply to both subject properties , regardless of land use designation
or zoning district. For these reasons , the proposed amendment is not anticipated to adversely impact
environmental quality .
October 16 , 2001
75
E bj
t
CONCLUSION
The proposed amendment is consistent with the comprehensive plan , compatible with all
surrounding land uses , and will cause no adverse impacts on the environment or the provision of
public services . The proposed change increases land use efficiency and facilitates economic
development. For these reasons , staff supports the request.
RECOMMENDATION
Based on the analysis conducted , staff and the Planning and Zoning Commission recommend that
the Board of County Commissioners approve the proposed amendment and rezoning by adopting
the attached ordinances .
ATTACHMENTS
I .Subject Property I Summary Page
2 .Subject Property 2 Summary Page
3 . Land Use Designation Amendment Application
4 . Rezoning Application
5 .Approved Minutes of the April 5 , 2001 , Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting6 . Approved Minutes of the May 17 , 2001 , Professional Services Advisory Committee Meeting7 . Approved Minutes of the May 22 , 2001 , Board of County Commissioners Meeting8 . DCA ' s ORC Report
9 .Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Designation Amendment Ordinance
10 . Rezoning Ordinance
CLERK ' S NOTE : Commissioner Adams arrived at 9 : 27 a. m .
during Director Keating ' s presentation of this matter . )
The Chairman opened the public hearing and asked if anyone wished to be heard in
this matter .
Bruce Barkett, 756 Beachland Blvd . , Vero Beach , who appeared on behalf of the
applicant, supported the recommendations of staff and advised he was available to respond
to any questions .
It was determined that no one else wished to be heard and the Chairman closed the
public hearing .
October 16 , 2001
76
BK 1 9rG 4 5
t
e .0 d h r,x{,-. It 5
rT ' kv x '+`," .Y,i' . . ; ,..., "i, e. er i
m +.:,r , . .:. r .,r,a . .., x a :. s,r r :_:.e:. d c>'1 e a Yrs: r , .:. .>: p n`r
s ._i,•'x+z rTr e ix'i w x#` . . Fy....u... -A u dzr+` h. ... t t '.,. T v r s v: s F s .s
dw rz'!.
fiY d." , ,:, A.t a"r 4"''^ s' r wn: j„ . :,...: z '
k` ' t',,: 3 a?i a Y,».' °.
7n
t ,c+ . rx =d'r' t -k r• > . '°5
f x'YF3 zIrv . C' xr
xa z 3i.. ra' a 4"C . s32ary k ,
R
rr.« tY«lr} t
ON MOTION by Commissioner Macht ,SECONDED BY
Commissioner Tippin , the Board unanimously adopted
Ordinance No . 2001 - 026 amending the Future Land Use
Element of the Comprehensive Plan by changing the Future
Land Use Designation for 15 . 46 acres located near the
southeast corner of USI and 53 " Street , from M - 1 , Medium -
Density Residential - 1 up to 8 units/acre ) , to C /I ,
Commercial/Industrial ; and by changing the Land Use
Designation for ± 16 . 79 acres located ± 1 , 550 feet south of 53rd
Street, on the east side of US 1 , from C/I to M - 1 ; and providing
severability and effective date .
ORDINANCE NO . 2001 - 026
AN ORDINANCE OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AMENDING THE FUTURE LAND
USE ELEMENT OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN BY CHANGING THE FUTURE LAND
USE DESIGNATION FOR ± 15 . 46 ACRES LOCATED NEAR THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF
US I AND 53RD STREET , FROM M - 1 , MEDIUM- DENSITY RESIDENTIAL- I (UP TO 8
UNITS/ACRE) , TO CA , COMMERCIALANDUSTRIAL ; AND BY CHANGING THE LAND USE
DESIGNATION FOR ± 16 . 79 ACRES LOCATED ± 1 , 550 FEET SOUTH OF 53RD STREET , ON
THE EAST SIDE OF US 1 , FROM C/I TO M - 1 ; AND PROVIDING SEVERABILITY AND
EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS ,the Board of County Commissioners adopted the Indian River County
Comprehensive Plan on February 13 , 1990 , and
WHEREAS , the county received comprehensive plan amendment applications during its January
2001 amendment submittal window , and
WHEREAS , the Local Planning Agency held a public hearing on this comprehensive plan
amendment request on April 5 , 2000 , after due public notice , and
WHEREAS , the Local Planning Agency recommended approval of this comprehensive plan
amendment to the Board of County Commissioners , and
WHEREAS , the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County held a Transmittal
Public Hearing on May 22 , 2001 , after advertising pursuant to F . S . 163 . 3184 ( 15 ) (b) l and ( c) , and
October 16 , 2001
77
3 6
s x
1 w s a .. ..r. fl yfFV R ai.q.. f,. ' L5 4' a , i.x...d. ...,zi r ""r -t. ' ' :, gab 4 . .ur x riw a t.;v, a . ,. J A s *x.,,,.t T s rrs s $. ... 2T a ..
z'' 2 4. x"ss . .s
Y. c. l" f' S^ a.>t•'E Si v :F '
G.:
Y3n ud
x
x., ., e } ,n 4 c 2 , i..,e.r i Yf 4^4 J
rs .x . xs '' ..4r .._ -*....1 9$S` . .,. S. r . ,. . e ,... d r,. a:. r t {x ,<c a 3k fkr.*-+rnr'rm vt a s'f „_ sv? a,•Aj
y. vt +- . ..,, a, T. 3 T o ,
T=" , > ..,.a rv"r+t x 3 x. x 3YTi '.; ;Y'r• ,c a#xy S'k#': ssRx I eF.. ,r r. 4a .r id' tt 2. . .r
y
1p r ,.: . . tt"?t' D°
r ?. , v'az"' ., ,. .,
x E„"s h t .. r, a ?, c,:.. v i t t+, is . « t r? arsy
1 i3 .:.et ' s`"r t t '= t t r a
Z, N r > •n Cn'%,4 ... ..r:IS" . rPo •m w. . L+. rn. r,` , . tt 4,?w i5 i`a' s+..,:. ; sr.-'/ +Y R s. ..OWN INWO
ORDINANCE NO . 2001 - 026
WHEREAS , the Board of County Commissioners approved the transmittal of this comprehensive
plan amendment to the Florida Department of Community Affairs for their review and comment, and
WHEREAS , the Board of County Commissioners announced at the transmittal public hearing its
intention to hold and advertise a final public hearing at the adoption stage of this plan amendment,
and
WHEREAS , the Florida Department of Community Affairs received this Comprehensive Plan
Amendment on June I1 , 2001 , for the State review pursuant to F. S . 163 . 3184 (4) , and
WHEREAS , Indian River County received the Objections , Recommendations , and Comments
ORC) Report from the Florida Department of Community Affairs on August 20, 2001 , and
WHEREAS , the ORC Report contained no objections or comments regarding this Comprehensive
Plan Amendment, and
WHEREAS , the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County held a Comprehensive
Plan Amendment Adoption Public Hearing on October 16 , 2001 , after advertising pursuant to
Chapter 163 . 3184( 15 ) (b ) 2 and (c ) , FS and Chapter 125 . 66(4) , FS ;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED , by the Board of County Commissioners of Indian
River County , Florida, that :
SECTION 1 . Comprehensive Plan Amendment Adoption and Transmittal
The amendment to the Indian River County Comprehensive Plan identified in Section 2 is hereby
adopted, and three ( 3 ) copies are directed to be transmitted to the State of Florida Department of
Community Affairs and one ( 1 ) copy is directed to be transmitted to the Treasure Coast Regional
Planning Council .
SECTION 2 . Amendments to the Comprehensive Plan
The land use designation of the following described property situated in Indian River County ,Florida to wit:
A portion of the northwest one-quarter of Section 23 , Township 32 South, Range 39 East, Indian
River County , Florida, lying south of 53rd Street, and being more particularly described as
follows : Commence at the northwest corner of said Section 23 , Township 32 South , Range 39
East and run South 89 degrees 58 minutes and 24 seconds East along the North line of the
Northwest one-quarter of said Section 23 , Township 32 South, Range 39 East a distance of 540 . 0
feet ; then run South 0 degrees 01 minutes 13 seconds West a distance of 100 . 0 feet to the Point
of Beginning of the herein described parcel ; then run South 89 degrees 58 minutes 24 seconds
October 16 , 2001
78
ar 47
rtri4.*,
e <,
a.
r<
Y„.;,
hv„,'.
a,
c,
sl.,.
x.'t>+.:. . ;r6`
s . >b,
eiR'.,.,,,
5,+''.°. .:
t",-?,t^
i,,',
t"tr'.
r:,-?.- ,
r, ,.
Yw.?•^#:-.{}."a'j-.P. .. '
ri.="
s
i5;`..
T..
3..•
3:
at€" "
d1`.;
y^
i-
n.=.is l. '
e;.,.
s:, s ..„ r'
7tt3,..
r•
1 dr. a ,t rxs xe,
z
t1 9ek. ,y- vt "rF.x.
t
ay•..,
z. :,:..
C s!„ s
Yfi>
c'.,',.?
a,:.',r
Ts
rnx-tzn”''
Yz tx,>`:,
a,.,.
4,
a°'
ya.rd r urlsz.y:.¥t.xvltS
nF
o-
4 X
v, . :.... ., y4
y6S:' . '. . .. ,. . 2 s a.,•'. F 'v'a 'i3 ri, t a 4 4 r at 3 r1_ 1..
st d fr. stT d Wit- rtT•^ -trn.i,•"S :t>`'vss "$}2 ^.'`n'u x`A ! t r
k {{ v ::=x," ! ' S yV '':a a \ n, , '~ru• zr:T N s> ' ., -. l.tu k,r`l'S'" a+ W' . .t <, f4 :;. '+n s't#."' :.%. ,.±:" t :'w`ru,:,.vT.:. ..% •,a'$;4 n..k 'Y" . S s`k- '%k,°."kS,"a* .v..,'<. 7,„"sv.}T ,ik t""..
r: 7:, . Y
r v' "
s . h ., 5 na ,.
n k s x °v:. `t ,+. #sa rx k esti yk`'Lt ,r •s. A - , kvy y
k -; ,r s "ell A. . .,
A z { r*» f .;r, .
s r a +E 1 : .
x, .<. l. .Qi`4s x ttic`T .k. u.o V a ...R Ex k".Y a v ., .,. fx _ i ... P. x. . s . . , . U x rt t*"4'- rY ,a. •- •.,m v . .:.:Y" 9 h.x. P . uxx riff N
sp. ,,.,. . w. e ?: t + .: , ro _ . . ..F . f v r . .. s r i.u':> xs, r.-r, , 4 t a c
L.
s .. ;u n tu -^An"r. ,nt ' xe::. f'`. . i^:.•o-i, xi x v.: <2a F Y 4
5 .?,, 't C
ORDINANCE NO . 2001 -026
East a distance of 798 . 93 feet to the East line of said Northwest one-quarter; then Run South 0
degrees 06 minutes 22 seconds East a distance of 561 . 24 feet ; then run South 52 degrees 04
minutes 04 seconds West a distance of 210 . 35 feet ; then run North 89 degrees 48 minutes 28
seconds West a distance of 117 . 0 feet ; then run South 16 degrees 40 minutes 42 seconds West
a distance of 370 . 0 feet ; then run North 89 degrees 48 minutes 28 seconds West a distance of
208 . 32 feet to the Easterly right- of- way line of U . S . highway No . 1 ; then run North 19 degrees
05 minutes 57 seconds West along said Easterly right- of- way line a distance of 257 . 0 feet to the
Point of Curvature of a curve concave to the Northeast having a radius of 17 , 128 . 75 feet, a central
angle of 2 degrees 43 minutes 38 seconds ; then along said curve for an are distance of 8 15 . 3 1
feet ; then run North 89 degrees 58 minutes 24 seconds East a distance of 129 . 87 feet; then run
North 0 degrees 01 minutes 13 seconds E a distance of 25 . 0 feet to the Point of Beginning .Containing 15 . 46 acres , more or less .
Is changed from M - 1 , Medium- Density Residential- 1 ( up to 8 units/acre) , to C/I, Commercial/
Industrial , and the Future Land Use Map is hereby revised accordingly .
AND
The land use designation of the following described property situated in Indian River County ,Florida to wit :
A parcel of land lying in the Southeast 1 /4 of the Northwest 1 /4 of Section 23 , Township 32
South , Range 39 East being more fully described as follows :
Beginning at the southwestern most corner of the Fairways at Grand Harbor as recorded in Plat
book 15 , Page 50 of the Public Records of Indian River County , Florida ; then North 0 degrees
06 minutes 09 seconds West, along the platted line of The Fairways , a distance of 696 . 41 feet ;
then North 89 degrees 42 minutes 10 seconds West, along the platted line of The Fairways , a
distance of 70 . 00 feet; then North 0 degrees 06 minutes 09 seconds West, along the platted line
of The Fairways , a distance of 470 . 67 feet; then leaving the platted line of The Fairways , South
89 degrees 45 minutes 49 seconds East, a distance of 537 .70 feet ; then North 59 degrees 05
minutes 56 seconds East, a distance of 186 . 65 feet to a point of non tangent curve located on the
west right-of- way line of Indian River Boulevard ; then along a curve to the left on said west right-
of- way line , which radius bears North 59 degrees 49 minutes 14 seconds East having a delta of
0 degrees 55 minutes 19 seconds a radius of 2 , 000 . 00 feet an arc length of 32 . 18 feet to a point
of compound curve ; then along a curve to the left having a delta of 06 degrees 42 minutes 16
seconds a radius of 3 , 965 . 97 feet an are length of 464 . 07 feet ; then South 04 degrees 54 minutes
28 seconds West, a distance of 61 . 36 feet to the southerly platted line of The Fairways ; then South
46 degrees 22 minutes 29 seconds West, along said platted line , a distance of 1145 . 39 feet ; then
North 89 decrees 38 minutes 09 seconds West, along said platted line , a distance of 70 . 20 feet
to the POINT OF BEGINNING .
Containing 731 , 808 . 00 square feet or 16 . 80 acres , more or less . Subject to all easements ,
restrictions and reservations of record .
Is changed from C/I , Commercial/ Industrial , to M- 1 , Medium- Density Residential - 1 ( up to 8
units/acre) , and the Future Land Use Map is hereby revised accordingly .
October 16 , 2001
79
s
r
1
r
x k n`
v
Y .FI<HE,.'M u"w", Y ' d F':i&l;d e'. .^'
1.+
r n r 1 t C 1" x.
r: . s ;,,tat
c z:' . c
rt
t x'a "x r ,: t a . .ai,:; e . a y,., , } ti'
r i; s:S. r ' e' E sw .. " t'> s"
r a nw.
x e 4 t».Fa..< a p ZV s rr , r _:. a , t , a h':6: 5 >fi c: : £' va .r k' ,r;`Y . vtv" ,Ye e x L ,c A.. T•, , . T w i x 3 i;:' x ri r r , r i a ». y :.
r.4 *`r e -
e. v ..l*_ r . i.:. E3 >x X<.c s x:r.. s ; s f
ry
r:. .- . X3. < ., , : . Sr.`,'-§sE. T*n'i R r . :x, v •F . . . .4t. H #a a r R, a .,.+,., a ..i z, .i u.< ., k 4 A c 5'r x r . .r '
x,11::3' u <..' ::
Tn yz YJ ,r. . ». R? .. . au,,,. k?" .F`,*'e '#.., „F t'2+ Si: . J rsa u :: e''+ rm^i :.
Y s
tv: . e:. t
t
pis
x x " s* r,w s».; s s c ,,...,n# w~ E , #: r t tr v`n e , v a m F'a t a
bs r..
r,.,.. rs 1,2'Y R } ¢ x.3,r::.•. .. '>!` S'!x. 3 ,R ::.2.. S"x: N:' w,. 3 s.z
F.s . 9 P. ,,_ iv,::. ,y a ° r k, - §_+u Y t ,.r w. a 3 f. es ze_J
S3z e tr:'.0%".y'tins
s, 's 5 ak',) " 3,. x`,+
aZ „ . A+s s„ a., nas '"vr T, hx , n J ,x s } y J ”
ORDINANCE NO . 2001 - 026
SECTION 3 . Repeal of Conflicting Provisions
All previous ordinances , resolutions , or motions of the Board of County Commissioners of Indian
River County , Florida which conflict with the provisions of this ordinance are hereby repealed to the
extent of such conflict.
SECTION 4 . Severability
It is declared to be the intent of the Board of County Cormnissioners that if any provision of this
ordinance and therefore , the Indian River County Comprehensive Plan Amendment is for any reason
finally held invalid or unconstitutional by any court of competent jurisdiction , such provision shall
be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision and such holding shall not affect the
validity of the remaining provisions .
SECTION 5 . Effective Date
The effective date of this ordinance , and therefore, this plan amendment, shall be the date a final
order is issued by the Department of Community Affairs or Administration Commission finding the
amendment in compliance with Section 163 . 3184( 1 ) (b) , Florida Statutes , whichever occurs earlier.
No development orders , development permits , or land uses dependent on this amendment may be
issued or commence before it has become effective . If a final order of noncompliance is issued by
the Administration Commission , this amendment may nevertheless be made effective by adoption
at a public meeting after public notice of a resolution affirming its effective status , a copy of which
resolution shall be sent to the Florida Department of Community Affairs , Division of Resource
Planning and Management , Plan Processing Team .
This ordinance was advertised in the Press -Joumal on the 3 `d
day of October, 2001 , for a public
hearing to be held on the 16 " day of October, 2001 , at which time it was moved for adoption byCommissionerMachtsecondedbyCommissionerTippinandadopted
by the following vote :
Chairman Caroline D . Ginn Aye
Vice- Chairman Ruth M . Stanbridge Aye
Commissioner Fran B . Adams Aye
Commissioner Kenneth R . Macht Aye
Commissioner John W . Tippin Aye
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
BY :
Caroline D . Ginn , Cha man
ATTEST B
Jeffrey K . Barton , Clerk
Acknowledgment by the Department of State of the State of Florida thisL-day of 2001 .
October 16 , 2001
80
8 L
Sa r.
T- 4y° ..;its` EF gym•.- . Re f J''? # sPh'*1 , a, ,:'" ar ti.. 3 .," e a y s:' 4.r. J tiu . s 4, Y.
suui .x :, . . w E =y :t53'P,Hg g .=.: uf +r ,'.>; tF ru:'
s ca..: ,. h ,x , _:. 1'#i . «5 .":« r ar -, . z
s ^- k v t c*.. . v" "`#:z4 s r t r " t r .ta, .
h, ,. M1 w . i.. yo.. r" , .Js .. , c il, ,iz,._ f..,,"s 3....,.,
s r a't .%z < e -. 1 4 .,ys=- Si. 1rx tz7"'X xX..a„ Fr'x?. k.A,, ,, t . ry v, x x S, ., .n::, i..' :. .: t kr. a . z r .. r.
s v't,t^, . ,.. 5^ s , F x1, r-
i;:{. , .. ,. 3,.. '« u >E.:, . . ::.at x° t rv s: a tJ` ,l'`""au y.. .... s n ,: ,, r c r n €* ... n 4
s s. '# - . - fi 2... ,.. . 5 L < rr ::.a. ..
bt,<.,.,, 't Y
4 t t s c 47k ? x t 4 r Y -. '
xY t^w '-
t7,a P„p un ,v
r r.,.r.P4< . a t". ,. s.. ..,< tx. :. .. . .. w .., S 'Y" s 5 5 y e
a m,a t s x x id'`x
t, bs :Xz.#,
y
v. a Asa S.x i.Ye" . . -.: osxt 2 x,*', 1} „s ,-T.l+.s { rF k- e ra t t , x
n a x `.-, - i e 3 ^ ` " P .M s tt J t i ) 3 f ,
v" ?
r,y,' a- ;` ,-xr;u,-`., ', s y ,. <.:. s „t kY e s , e :
s s• :s 5 ... . at t TM Ts i-4 a x-:: t ",,, ^,.sx y 3
x 'i ' .7 t a: t f4 1 ` G"•,a a ':r s_ s
e .•i;. t ".z.= a, S .,.z u
iy, r e i f Y 5 3" r rr2. . r J: 4, ,. h r n , x„ P
a"'.
Krr . ^'R .,! ., ,
i . M ., s..-. 5,. .. w. sr v , n , .,. .ss .. ',. s . .}5a ? vo-a1 r--P . . , fi"".
s
r x w: Kn e
n+ -.7 d:t ".,5 1 G'
ORDINANCE NO . 2001 -026
Acknowledgment from the Department of State received on this day ofv\k", 2001 , at
A.M ./and filed in the office of the Clerk of the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River
County , Florida .
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGAL SUFFICIENCY
ttEy County Attorney
nlian Rira Ci Avproved Dale
Admin.
O
Legal
APPROVED AS TO PLANNING MATTERS
Eudgel 10 I0 v
Dep 1,
n
Risk Mgr,
A
Robert M . Keating , A CP ; Com mity Deve meat Director
cd\uAjwVluAlutherfairwaysVluda ord. wpd
ON MOTION by Vice Chairman Stanbridge , SECONDED BY
Commissioner Tippin , the Board unanimously adopted
Ordinance No . 2001 - 027 amending the Zoning Ordinance and
the Accompanying Zoning Map from RM - 6 , Multiple - Family
Residential District up to 6 units/acre) , to CG , General
Commercial District , for 15 . 46 acres located near the southeast
corner of USI and 53 "Street -and amending the Zoning
Ordinance and the Accompanying zoning Map from CL ,
Limited Commercial District, to RM - 8 , Multiple-Family
Residential District ( up to 8 units/acre) , for 16 . 79 acres located
X1 , 550 feet south of 53 " Street , on the east side of US 1 , and
M described herein , and providing for effective date .
October 16 , 2001
81
1 i50
1
a
r a E '
x 77
x s
d 'ri - . . . , ad`u n +R'"`s*s' e-'.++ fi 5r ,f3'tt
m' 'rK r e'i` r , ,,f: '; t*..-r r . , .s f a„ y h'.y
s 1
r: rt.';_m^a rz.;.' x a '
zd 43 Fs`
Y a.rt r
v J F 1 vw
a. t ..,'.c., #'"' 'i*' :J`a' s :... I '4"x a ..:>r t nn ^
4
15. ., cx " r as t Y e, zl e N".. t E, d'S r ,
k"• ., ..., q = ^S ` S t3„t.*e=> zy , :i:5 ns+z. sJ„ ..J# a' s a s.„ ;,.. sr .?
s, .
rz v y t p f s v a `wr y N z . ;s' Y
5
5 s dT'
3Yxy "" +.3 'y y( i
v
f^
x .-- 'Y Y 3 ,<'t '; v 5 . :.k ' 5 : ,r
F
s -,-
h ,'
k ' 3 £'"d y.. ;
ia IJ rE „f'# 3 `::«. 5 .,, .t.9, yr # E', , .}. T.} ..qY .."3 e Y " t
s.r . r
i Y Y,,
K "3v
r
fr& ' F
r'
tF v+'' . .' ierd k eShy .A..aT A 'xvl i K y' S: . ,,".Y..
d F k r P tl y xL
2`
Y Y 3 3
y rt5 l- y h j
r .,. i' t r 4' a">, #.p ptA'73` i .sn2,. . ti ra f ; • ..
ri ,;. n1?k"a „', k {' +,g v',R.,k,. kms, .y
t-',°.., fn , r ,n, rT'.> .. x Fr.'.. . s, x . . x .
ORDINANCE NO . 2001 - 027
AN ORDINANCE OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY , FLORIDA , AMENDING THE ZONING
ORDINANCE AND THE ACCOMPANYING ZONING MAP FROM RM-6 , MULTIPLE-FAMILY
RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (UP TO 6 UNITS/ACRE) , TO CG , GENERAL COMMERCIAL
DISTRICT, FOR ± 15 .46 ACRES LOCATED NEAR THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF US 1 AND
53RD STREET ; AND AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE AND THE ACCOMPANYING
ZONING MAP FROM CL , LIMITED COMMERCIAL DISTRICT, TO RM- 8 , MULTIPLE -
FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (UP TO 8 UNITS/ACRE) , FOR ± 16 . 79 ACRES LOCATED
1 , 550 FEET SOUTH OF 53RD STREET, ON THE EAST SIDE OF US 1 , AND DESCRIBED
HEREIN , AND PROVIDING FOR EFFECTIVE DATE .
WHEREAS , the Planning and Zoning Commission , sitting as the local planning agency on
such matters , has held a public hearing and subsequently made a recommendation regarding this
rezoning request ; and
WHEREAS , the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County , Florida , did
publish its Notice of Intent to rezone the hereinafter described property ; and
WHEREAS , the Board of County Commissioners has determined that this rezoning is in
conformance with the Comprehensive Plan of Indian River County ; and
WHEREAS , the Board of County Commissioners has held a public hearing pursuant to this
rezoning request, at which parties in interest and citizens were heard ;
NOW , THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED , by the Board of County Conunissioners of Indian
River County , Florida, that the zoning of the following described property situated in Indian River
County , Florida, to- wit:
A portion of the northwest one-quarter of Section 23 , Township 32 South, Range 39 East ,
Indian River County , Florida, lying south of 53 `d Street, and being more particularly
described as follows : Commence at the northwest corner of said Section 23 , Township 32
South , Range 39 East and run South 89 degrees 58 minutes and 24 seconds East along the
North line of the Northwest one -quarter of said Section 23 , Township 32 South, Range 39
East a distance of 540 . 0 feet ; then run South 0 degrees 01 minutes 13 seconds West a
distance of 100 . 0 feet to the Point of Beginning of the herein described parcel ; then run South
89 degrees 58 minutes 24 seconds East a distance of 798 . 93 feet to the East line of said
Northwest one- quarter ; then Run South 0 degrees 06 minutes 22 seconds East a distance of
561 . 24 feet; then run South 52 degrees 04 minutes 04 seconds West a distance of 210 . 35 feet;
then run North 89 degrees 48 minutes 28 seconds West a distance of 117 . 0 feet ; then run
South 16 degrees 40 minutes 42 seconds West a distance of 370 . 0 feet ; then run North 89
degrees 48 minutes 28 seconds West a distance of 208 . 32 feet to the Easterly right-of- way
line of U . S . highway No . 1 ; then run North 19 degrees 05 minutes 57 seconds West along
said Easterly right- of- way line a distance of 257 . 0 feet to the Point of Curvature of a curve
October 16 , 2001
82
0 ;) 1
l
l
5
4r
a
k 5" wi p a x 'rop a
x '
e6
Y i i-vr rYa i > 3 In, a .. s n
ts n„
55'.,,
4'' e AY"' 'k , skirt * "
r „' " g{ 3rt(
a`
tz 4 .', :. S k fir . . rc r:kr ' ne
r
i.
rry y'>Bi-A^
y ,.
nP` 7{1 T' 21 'f k '
c
e y e -, . r; t x
r fi a r r it - as , eg g r i vv ..u, +
v V x
43gip,
tif .
54 ss{'3K spm a* 4Yt `3 T F
Sk'
t•`. .,k ` s"
a '
y r x .r
a r; r ra z e , t # <
fv
rx .. .a'.>m.AYYraUas`e- . ,n+ w.-ter” . F` :+` 2r°"u,"n s.*. .. r.-..',' d . . : ,n. r` .,a . - < Y . , tf•5 r , a Ss , . r s . _x4.,? ,R., c5 i. a< ., ..
ff
z T' -rt a ' . 4' rr3v .r... ,x- t t 'u u. 4 qr ;. 5 q':
r ttm, L Yt x :,.> gv yat`+ ,. eh , 3a. am
r a as r + 3-a' ,* rwa ; t w s,'? 5''^ K . J;rr,„
t ,s X r r '.. y ; t w{{y l ...
r r.2 „”4„ x.y a„
i rr*
sv sa . r =a., y . s r r , b ' gtvtz i i 5,
n
v y AG"i .,"* ,
ORDINANCE NO . 2001 - 027
concave to the Northeast having a radius of 17 , 128 . 75 feet, a central angle of 2 degrees 43
minutes 38 seconds ; then along said curve for an arc distance of 815 . 31 feet ; then run North
89 degrees 58 minutes 24 seconds East a distance of 129 . 87 feet ; then run North 0 degrees
01 minutes 13 seconds E a distance of 25 . 0 feet to the Point of Beginning . Containing 15 .46
acres , more or less .
Is changed from RM- 6 , Multiple-Family Residential District ( up to 6 units/acre) , to CG , General
Commercial District .
AND
The zoning of the following described property situated in Indian River County , Florida , to- wit:
A parcel of land lying in the Southeast 1 /4 of the Northwest 1 /4 of Section 23 ,
Township 32 South , Range 39 East being more fully described as follows :
Beginning at the southwestern most corner of the Fairways at Grand Harbor as recorded in
Plat book 15 , Page 50 of the Public Records of Indian River County , Florida ; then North 0
degrees 06 minutes 09 seconds West, along the platted line of The Fairways , a distance of
696 . 41 feet; then North 89 degrees 42 minutes 10 seconds West, along the platted line of The
Fairways , a distance of 70 . 00 feet ; then North 0 degrees 06 minutes 09 seconds West, along
the platted line of The Fairways , a distance of 470 . 67 feet ; then leaving the platted line of
The Fairways , South 89 degrees 45 minutes 49 seconds East, a distance of 537 .70 feet ; then
North 59 degrees 05 minutes 56 seconds East, a distance of 186 . 65 feet to a point of non
tangent curve located on the west right- of- way line of Indian River Boulevard ; then along
a curve to the left on said west right- of- way line , which radius bears North 59 degrees 49
minutes 14 seconds East having a delta of 0 degrees 55 minutes 19 seconds a radius of
2 , 000 . 00 feet an arc length of 32 . 18 feet to a point of compound curve ; then along a curve
to the left having a delta of 06 degrees 42 minutes 16 seconds a radius of 3 , 965 . 97 feet an arc
IV
length of 464 . 07 feet ; then South 04 degrees 54 minutes 28 seconds West, a distance of 61 . 36
feet to the southerly platted line of The Fairways ; then South 46 degrees 22 minutes 29
seconds West, along said platted line , a distance of 1145 . 39 feet; then North 89 decrees 38
minutes 09 seconds West, along said platted line , a distance of 70 . 20 feet to the POINT OF
BEGINNING .
Containing 731 , 808 . 00 square feet or 16 . 80 acres , more or less . Subject to all easements ,
restrictions and reservations of record .
Is changed from CL , Limited Commercial District , to RM- 8 , Multiple-Family Residential District
up to 8 units/acre) .
All with the meaning and intent as set forth and described in said Land Development Regulations .
Effective Date : This ordinance shall become effective upon the issuance by the State Department
of Community Affairs of a Notice of Intent to find the related Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use
Designation Amendment contained in Ordinance Number 2001 -026 in compliance in accordance
with s . 163 . 3184 ( 9) or the issuance of a final order by the Administration Commission finding the
referenced amendment in compliance with s . 163 . 3184 ( 10) .
Approved and adopted by the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County , Florida , on
this 16" day of October, 2001 .
October 16 , 2001
83
rn
s
gik7 sv.x , w: `,
r
v..akf 1Xi , .d.+.v. . -c,yU&:
tx a i, t a`. 4t
s a c 2 n s' t A;.
r $ " d Pik. r s r ' Y r . ,r 's, ar Y t k
Ith J i gat a 1s
fY 'aVr gat.. fi •Y E ", t
Itt 4a x x' i r t Y
s z s,
y IV
z ...'F . ., y. .,i n s s.
r , w v ;
z e ,' .. . : rY „"7f•si'3_ . r. ..4 "' L'
I!,
f
4 +i t k t`"`^ yxj >t
x
u rv+. 'F q : y f4 Y? x • t rr s t x,t {
1 4 h
3 n s +
a m+z 1 x « k [•. "+ t s`? .x r h a..,:a
t
x e d.., z
ry ti ,}'r 4t^.. P . •t1
m
v y s'tg{^' 1,,:r yx -
s`k x ti."rw 3 z
a
c ' . `,. °c,.;,x'd`t:""'Pn.x" '.m`d.' .r $cs "yv `' r:, . X:w. 1m < ..-a..,_.+-t,'r" , w . . •,.1. yppc . .H wt , m ut .'s ,. •s.., , -, n ya a. .. . 'L ., N Y;+ - „- " . . 7„ PF x ,+° .. 6 s4.' , s.
N
ORDINANCE NO . 2001 - 027
This ordinance was advertised in the Press-Journal on the 3 `d day of October, 2001 , for a public
hearing to be held on the 16" day of October, 2001 , at which time it was moved for adoption by
Commissioner Stanbridge seconded by Conunissioner Ti ppi n and
adopted by the following vote :
Chairman Caroline D . Ginn Aye
Vice- Chairman Ruth M . Stanbridge Aye
Commissioner Fran B . Adams Aye
Commissioner Kenneth R . Macht Aye
Commissioner John W . Tippin Aye
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
r
r
BY : c c
Caroline D . Ginn , C irman
ATTEST Bu cep d;e
Jeffrey K . Barton, Clerk
Acknowledgment by the Department of State of the State of Florida thisl day ofo ' F , 2001 .
Acknowledgment from the Department of State received on this day of Y'IT , 2001 , at
A. M ./ and filed in the office of the Clerk of the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River
County , Florida.
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGAL SUFFICIENCY
N
County Attorney
APPROVED AS TO PLANNING MATTERS
Robert M . Keating , AICP
Community Development Director
Iniim Riva c. I,oprovea oa ie
Admin. Woo
cd\u\jw\lu\hammond 2001 \rzon ord . wpd Legal
Budget Ib Joel
oe01.
l
October 16 , 2001
84
b9WMM
1r22.r
F ,,.
Mt
a• x i rx moi. li it
f
t a
S'
6
t c•ixti,% '+k" opc$ 3S+}a=O r$ .. rx. ., 'r. _
a"
I }+s, ,. .w . °'s n > . , . .s •j ", ,.S7. _ s —r, . , -.
t' „
r , f . w '` ."Y ...-.. o. ,. . .,...,'
v ;
1'
a
fta ?^nf
2,i',y'i' '• P iAe rs h .ip ,U.n ar y . tN r
r
l'°$lY:.,. M1
11 ,31, 1 lr
t s Cly I I
O+. '" C'N i-r ^
4
xn ,, " *zk *,e'' "^• .2r .,.'ti t,,. n" ;$" e s;-
r y
fi
9 . Ae4e PUBLIC HEARING - ORDINANCE NO . 20.01 - 028 - COUNTY-
INITIATED REQUEST TO AMEND THE RECREATION AND OPEN
SPACE ELEMENT OF THE COUNTY ' S COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
Legislative
PROOF OF PUBLICATION IS ON FILE
IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of October 3 , 2001 :
TO : James E . Chandler ; County Administrator
P RTMENT HEAD CONCURRENCE
G
Robert M. Keating, AICP Commu i Development Director
i
THROUGH : Sasan Rohani , AICP ; Chief, Long- Range Planning
FROM : John Wachtel ; Senior Planner, Long - Range Planning
DATE : October 3 , 2001
RE : Countv Initiated Request to Amend The Recreation and Open Space Element
of the County ' s Comprehensive Plan
PLAN AMENDMENT NUMBER : CPTA 2001 - 01 - 0109
It is requested that the data herein presented be given formal consideration by the Board of County
Commissioners at its regular meeting of October 16 , 2001 .
DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS
On February 13 , 1990 , Indian River County adopted its comprehensive plan . On :March 17 , 1998 ,
as part of the Evaluation and Appraisal Process , that plan was substantially updated . The plan must
periodically be reviewed and revised in order to reflect the community ' s changing needs and desires .
For that reason , the county has initiated this amendment.
BACKGROUND
Although the Recreation and Open Space Element of the plan currently contains an Objective and
a policy related to arts and culture, the Board of County Commissioners , on April 117 20001
instructed staff to initiate a comprehensive plan amendment to create a cultural element for the
comprehensive plan . Since that time , staff has worked with the Cultural Council , which is the
county ' s designated Local Arts Agency , on several aspects of this project .
The development of a new element requires several phases , including an inventory of existing
conditions and facilities . For a cultural element, facilities could include auditoriums , theaters (indoor
October 16 , 2001
85
p ODIi ' it>
I
4
t „Y: u, `
k s r
7,,,a rxr
ws * i `'.
3 c,¢
r
Y. d, s K t, . S"
r+. r. 3»n
Y . _ rt .tl:- a d. , s e 'k p Y.Vi
and outdoor) , museums , galleries , and classrooms . Conditions could include an inventory of arts
organizations , the size of their membership , and how many people use the various facilities . This
phase could also include a description of the condition of the facilities .
Currently , an acceptable inventory of existing conditions and facilities is not available . The Cultural
Council , however, has offered to help develop one for the future .
Recognizing that without an inventory of existing conditions and facilities a new element could not
be developed , it was determined that as an interim step , prior to the development of a new element,
a new goal and two new objectives involving cultural activities could be added to the Recreation and
Open Space Element .
Those proposed changes to the comprehensive plan were processed for the July 2000 amendment
submittal window . On September 28 , 2000 , the Planning and Zoning Commission held a public
hearing and voted to recommend that the Board of County Commissioners approve that amendment .
On November 7 , 2000 , the Board of County Commissioners held a public hearing at which they
considered the July 2000 cultural amendments . At that meeting several concerns were raised
regarding the proposed amendments . Because of those concerns , the Board instructed staff not to
transmit those amendments to the Florida Department of Community Affairs . Instead , the Board
instructed staff to continue to work on the proposed cultural objectives and to reprocess them as part
of the January 2001 plan amendment cycle .
Planning staff has continued to work with the Board, the Cultural Council , and the general public
to address the concerns raised at the November 7 , 2000 , meeting . Through that method a new
amendment was drafted and submitted during the January 2001 plan amendment application
submittal window .
The subject revisions delete Recreation and Open Space Element Objective 11 and Policy 11 . 1 , and
create new Recreation and Open Space Objective 11 and Policies 11 . 1 to 11 . 6 .
The proposed additions and deletions to the plan are shown in Attachment 2 . In this attachment,
deletions are indicated by stiikc tinough: , while additions are shown as double underlined .
PAST ACTIONS
On April 5 , 2001 , the Planning and Zoning Commission voted to 6 to 1 to recommend that the Board
of County Commissioners approve the proposed amendment with the addition , by reference , of
definitions of cultural organizations . That recommendation has been incorporated into Attachment
2 .
On May 17 , 2001 , the Professional Services Advisory Committee voted 9 to 0 recommend that the
Board of County Commissioners approve the proposed amendment .
On June 5 , 2001 , the Board of County Commissioners voted 5 to 0 to transmit the proposed
E
comprehensive plan text amendment request to the Florida Department of Community Affairs
DCA ) for its review .
ORC REPORT
Consistent with state regulations , DCA reviewed the proposed amendment and prepared an
Objections , Recommendations and Continents ( ORC ) Report ( dated August 17 , 2001 ) , which
planning staff received on August 20 , 2001 . The DCA ORC Report , Attachment 6 at the end of this
staff report, does not contain any objections or comments relating to the proposed amendment .
October 16 , 2001
86
g
F t nn„' ti,d t .k t +t 4 t,
s f s e v
a'rr i-Vx.° " xrz<Y` b K ' , c SY`"M Y ' D
y , Y
s' ar hyTM.
n - y a§ . s
q
7
t
x.
4. L + r e v- S'a
VIP wxak v . ,, b -§ 1 ui>wd 1e , , .'x 3 . ro3, Kirin r c y .,. ..,. 7 '; a: P';,.F "1i°i' r R#.L'i .w;^1w,x'^ 1"mrii uck 7 ..&r W
h ..,,e r,°we°r e a ti¢,;v s,;+'.. .: "F,^3' s y?'.,
Ya.>x a Y'uw``S,:UYE. *L
s.:k w:u 4 fig° C.."s `tC'„"=T,'u 4^ v
x
ANALYSIS
This section will present an analysis of the reasonableness of the proposed amendment, followed by
a discussion of the consistency of the proposed amendment with the comprehensive plan .
ANALYSIS OF REASONABLENESS OF PROPOSED AMENDMENT
An objective and its policies form an "objective cluster . " The proposed new objective cluster
establishes a framework to guide county decisions about culture and the arts .
The proposed new objective is measurable and achievable . Directly related to achieving the
objective, the proposed new policies are actions that the county can take to support arts and culture
in the county .It is important to note that the proposed policies do not support any particular
organization . In fact, they are specifically worded to refer to all county cultural organizations .
Finally , no changes to any existing policies or procedures are required to implement the proposed
policies . For these reasons , the proposed amendment is reasonable .
CONSISTENCY WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
Staff reviews each comprehensive plan amendment request for consistency with all applicable
policies of the comprehensive plan . As per Section 800 . 07 ( 1 ) of the county code, the
comprehensive plan may only be amended in such a way as to preserve the internal consistency of
the plan pursuant to Section 163 . 3177 ( 2) F . S . "
The goals , objectives and policies are the most important parts of the comprehensive plan . Policies
are statements in the plan which identify the actions which the county will take in order to direct the
community ' s development . As courses of action committed to by the county , policies provide the
basis for all county land development related decisions --including plan amendment decisions .
While all comprehensive plan policies are important, some have more applicability than others in
reviewing plan amendment requests . Future Land Use Element Policy 14 . 3 , however, is applicable
to all plan amendment requests . For that reason , this section will begin with a discussion of how the
proposed amendment is consistent with Future Land Use Element Policy 14 . 3 .
Future Land Use Element Policy 14 .3
In evaluating any comprehensive plan text amendment request, the most important consideration is
Future Land Use Element Policy 14 . 3 . This policy requires that at least one of three criteria be met
in order to approve a comprehensive plan text amendment . These criteria are :
e the proposed amendment corrects a mistake in the approved plan ;
the proposed amendment corrects an oversight in the approved plan ; or
0 the proposed amendment is warranted based on a substantial change in circumstances .
In this instance , the subject amendment meets Future Land Use Element Policy 14 . 3 's third criterion.
That criterion allows plan amendments based on a substantial change in circumstances . In this
instance , that change in circumstances is the initiative taken by the Board of County Commissioners .
That initiative is based on a new recognition of several factors including the community ' s desires
and the benefits of arts and culture to the county ' s economy and quality of life . For that reason , the
proposed amendment is consistent with Future Land Use Element Policy 14 . 3 .
October 16 , 2001
87
a
f
r tx r t
l
YF.i4 4
N r
i S %C" , a YF
i
i -.
q`X S - \
i>
K'•• 1 y
Y Y 1 E 4
4
t S 5 fi
c, hx r`, .x y k
u .
s•"
v' x w. . . i v . , .' r i r . ,f a Y . t
3
2 '.. . n.r<4 v..,o' 4-- .p - .«': fi%a * 3.< s '^>ar F.a y a, a. R'
Tj
Economic Development Element Objectives 1 and 6 , and Policy 6. 1 .
The proposed amendment is consistent with Economic Development Element Objective 1 , which
relates to concerning lowering the county ' s unemployment rate , and Economic Development
Element Objective 6 concerning tourism development. Several studies indicate that art and cultural
programs have a large positive impact on local economies . Additionally , an active arts and cultural
community is often cited as an amenity used to attract new businesses and industries . Economic
Development Element Policy 6 . 1 specifically notes that cultural offerings attract tourism. For these
reasons , the proposed amendment is consistent with Economic Development Element Objectives
1 and 6 ; and Economic Development Element Policy 6 . 1 .
Consistency Summary
As part of its consistency analysis , staff compared the proposed amendment to all applicable
objectives and policies in the plan and found no conflicts . Therefore , the request is consistent with
the comprehensive plan .
CONCLUSION
The proposed objective cluster establishes a framework to guide county decisions about culture and
the arts . Containing methods for specifically defining and measuring cultural activities , the proposed
objective is both measurable and achievable . Structured to positively impact all county arts and
cultural organizations , the proposed policies are county actions that are consistent with current
policies and procedures . Based on the analysis , the proposed revisions are reasonable and consistent
with the comprehensive plan . For those reasons , staff supports the request.
RECOMMENDATION
Based on the analysis conducted, staff and the Planning and Zoning Commission recommend that
the Board of County Commissioners approve the proposed amendment by adopting the attached
ordinance .
ATTACHMENTS
1 . Comprehensive Pian Text Amendment Application
2 . Proposed Revisions to the Comprehensive Plan
3 . Approved Minutes of the April 5 , 2001 , Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting
4 . Approved Minutes of the May 17 , 2001 , Professional Services Advisory Committee Meeting
5 . Approved Minutes of the June 5 , 2001 , Board of County Commissioners Meeting
6 . DCA ' s ORC Report
7 . Comprehensive Plan Text Amendment Ordinance
October 16 , 2001
88
E d b
Of Z)
ro to c
iC l.r... .. . . . . t n 1R 1 fM+ "r n ! rv. . .T .. . . . c r+ ry l '
x € ..: S-. en. •^>.. tya... [ . Su "-^ ap. . . . a -'i A. {x N ¢ fi cz t:CSFl . . x nY .. e 4 F . ., 1 .,C 5;y. .,.
s. .. . ..x 1P .. . . ",, . e,~ .. 3.. F.. , i„ r.re a . .,,:.rr ,. .., ,s . Wit& i a .
In response to Vice Chairman Stanbridge ' s inquiry about the need for specifying that
The National Taxonomy of Exempt Entities Manual " (TNTEEM) shall be used to define
cultural organizations (Attachment A , Objective 11 , Arts and Cultural Programs ) , Director
Keating thought that related to the definition of what was a cultural organization .She did
not want us to " get so tight" that we cannot think outside the manual .
Commissioner Adams suggested adding, if it is a concern , and other appropriate
interpretations " and this should be applied to any areas that refer to that manual .
Vice Chairman Stanbridge concurred and Director Keating indicated his
understanding .
Commissioner Macht looked for assurance that this is generic and does not refer to
a specific implementing organization by name , and Director Keating advised that was
correct .
There was consensus that the application is and should be very broad .
The Chairman opened the public hearing and asked if anyone wished to be heard in
this matter .There being none , she closed the public hearing .
ON MOTION by Commissioner Macht, SECONDED BY Vice
Chairman Stanbridge , the Board unanimously adopted
Ordinance No . 2001 - 028 as amended add and other
appropriate interpretations " to all references to The National
Taxonomy of Exempt Entities Manual definitions) amending
the Recreation and Open Space Element of the Comprehensive
Plan regarding a Cultural Objective and Cultural Policies , and
providing severability and effective date .
October 16 , 2001
89
BiA
1777777:7 z + s7777
S
t
IJ
F L S F 1
rm Ft ?`
i Y.c i. ; m 'r ` `,5,`{+ 3 fe=s ne z .
r
r. -. i r$. . i„ - s „m`i,' , f, ' r.a, yz . n .s9e R, ,.v 5 e " r .;'" S.st `q.H„ " 3 *e` `` Y'. .?"Y' tu'bt"” d. Y ss`- ; r
z.°
rT.'¢ z. ' Sra ? i 7
ORDINANCE NO . 2001 - 028
AN ORDINANCE OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY , FLORIDA , AMENDING THE RECREATION
AND OPEN SPACE ELEMENT OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN REGARDING A
CULTURAL OBJECTIVE AND CULTURAL POLICIES ; AND PROVIDING SEVERABILITY
AND EFFECTIVE DATE .
WHEREAS , the Board of County Commissioners adopted the Indian River County
Comprehensive Plan on February 13 , 1990 , and
WHEREAS , the county received comprehensive plan amendment applications during its
January 2001 amendment submittal window , and
WHEREAS , the Local Planning Agency held a public hearing on all comprehensive plan
amendment requests on April 5 , 2001 , after due public notice , and
WHEREAS ,the Local Planning Agency made a recommendation regarding this
comprehensive plan amendment to the Board of County Commissioners , and
WHEREAS , the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County held a Transmittal
Public Hearing on June 5 , 2001 , after advertising pursuant to F. S . 163 . 3184 ( 15 ) (b ) ( 1 ) and (c ) , and
WHEREAS , the Board of County Commissioners approved the transmittal of this
comprehensive plan amendment to the Florida Department of Community Affairs for their review
and comment , and
WHEREAS , the Board of County Commissioners announced at the transmittal public hearing
its intention to hold and advertise a final public hearing at the adoption stage of this plan amendment,
and
WHEREAS , the Florida Department of Community Affairs received this Comprehensive
Plan Amendment on June 11 , 2001 , for the State review pursuant to F . S . 163 . 3184(4) , and
WHEREAS , Indian River County received the Objections , Recommendations , and
of C onununit Affairs on August 20 2001Comments ( ORC) Report from the Florida Departmenty
and
WHEREAS , the ORC Report contained no objections regarding this Comprehensive Plan
Amendment. and
October 16 , 2001
90
per
F
ro
tie x4 ,.. 5'a. s+: 7s``r* s, a r "` „ ''.. ,nt a" , •,.' 6
ORDINANCE NO . 2001 - 028
WHEREAS , the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County held a
Comprehensive Plan Amendment Adoption Public Hearing on October 16 , 2001 , after advertising
pursuant to F. S . 163 . 3184 ( 15 ) (b) ;
NOW, THEREFORE , BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of County Commissioners of Indian
River County , Florida, that :
SECTION 1 . Comprehensive Plan Amendment Adoption and Transmittal
The amendment to the Indian River County Comprehensive Plan identified in Section 2 is
hereby adopted, and three (3 ) copies are directed to be transmitted to the State of Florida Department
of Community Affairs and one ( 1 ) copy is directed to be transmitted to the Treasure Coast RegionalPlanningCouncil .
SECTION 2 . Amendment to the Comprehensive Plan
Objective 11 and Policy 11 . 1 are replaced by a new Objective 11 and new Policies 11 . 1
through 11 . 6 of the Recreation and Open Space Element of the Comprehensive Plan , as shown onAttachmentA .
SECTION 3 . Repeal of Conflicting Provisions
All previous ordinances , resolutions , or motions of the Board of County Commissioners of
Indian River County , Florida which conflict with the provisions of this ordinance are hereby repealedtotheextentofsuchconflict.
SECTION 4 . Severability
It is declared to be the intent of the Board of County Commissioners that if any provision of
this ordinance and therefore , the Indian River County Comprehensive Plan Amendment is for any
reason finally held invalid or unconstitutional by any court of competent jurisdiction, such provision
shall be deemed a separate , distinct and independent provision and such holding shall not affect the
validity of the remaining provisions .
SECTION 5 . Effective Date
The effective date of this ordinance, and therefore , this plan amendment, shall be the date a
final order is issued by the Department of Community Affairs or Administration Commission finding
the amendment in compliance with Section 163 . 3184 ( 1 ) ( b) , Florida Statutes , whichever occurs
earlier. No development orders , development permits , or land uses dependent on this amendment
may be issued or commence before it has become effective . If a final order of noncompliance isissuedbhetAdministrationmstratio Commission , this amendment may nevertheless be made effective by
adoption at a public meeting after public notice of a resolution affirming its effective status , a copy
of which resolution shall be sent to the Florida Department of Community Affairs , Division of
Resource Planning and Management, Plan Processing Team .
October 16 , 2001
91
Bre I ; 6 0
allkla
Y
1
k
9 a...,,. ,. .
pp: k. .. :- . z;.v ` , LN} b
h,.
v€a`i „ s
ORDINANCE NO. 2001 - 028
This ordinance was advertised in the Press -Journal on the 3 `d
day of October, 2001 , for apublichearingtobeheldonthe16`h
day of October, 2001 , at which time it was moved for adoptionbyCommissionerMachtsecondedbyCommissionerStanbridgeandadoptedbythefollowingvote :
Chairman Caroline D . Ginn Aye
Vice -Chairman Ruth M . Stanbridge Aye
Commissioner Fran B . Adams Ave
Commissioner Kenneth R. Macht Aye
Commissioner John W . Tippin Aye
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
Caroline D . Ginn , Cli rman
ATTEST Be
yD_
C
Jeffrey K. Barton , ClerkXN
Acknowledgment by the Department of State of the State of Florida this o day of C , 2001
Acknowledgment from the Department of State received on this day ofy 2001 , at
A .M.Q. and filed in the office of the Clerk of the Board of County Commissioners of Indian RiverCounty , Florida .
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGAL SUFFICIENCY
1411iaaq G . County Attorney
APPROVED AS TO PLANNING MATTERS
indan Riva Cftdolta
Admin.
Robert M. Keating, AICP LegalCommunityDevelopmentDiectoreudfletf: Acd\u \jw\cpta\jan01 \ci cultural\ord . wpd
Risk
October 16 , 2001
92
DI U U
F
3
r
s Lry k § ax
x
i
a t
41
S'
7777
f'x, m+ x... , a$ b 4' 1N. n .; Sr r qty y , yX'rti J.'f, Y .ql T F u
SY e'r>tik 4yyee +w_4 t .+'i rr. Y <.a H .S:.J , u514 E L 4 1 i., Z11
i
ORDINANCE NO. 2001 - 028
ATTACHMENT A
RECREATION AND OPEN SPACE ELEMENT
OBJECTIVE 11 : Arts and Cultural Programs
By 2005 , the number of activities and events sponsored each year by Indian River County cultural
organizations will exceed by 20 % the number of activities and events sponsored in 2001 . The
number of activities in 2001 will be identified in a report titled "America for the Arts Economic
Impact Study " to be published in 2002 . "The National Taxonomy of Exempt Entities Manual
TNTEEM) or other appropriate sources shall be used to define cultural organizations .
Policy 11 . 1 The County may support cultural activities by providing financial support through
tourist tax revenue and the Tourist Development Council .
Policy 11 .2 The County shall support cultural organizations ' ( as defined by TNTEEM or other
appropriate sources) applications for state , federal, and private foundation grants . The County ' s
support may include providing customized demographic information , leveraging the County ' s grant
eligibility , providing letters of support , and providing other support as needed .
Policy 11 .3 The County shall consider arts and cultural activity funding requests only for
organizations ( as defined by TNTEEM or other appropriate sources ) that submit the following
information to the County Budget Office :
detailed information about the organization ' s accomplishments during the last fiscal year,
specifically as related to funding received from the County ;
i
detailed budget information pertaining to any funds that the organization is requesting ;
the organization ' s proposed goals and activities for the upcoming fiscal year; and
a copy of the organization ' s most recent audit, if applicable .
Policy 11 .4 The County shall support cultural programs and events by allowing the use of County
facilities when appropriate and not inconsistent with County needs .
Policy 11 .5 The Board of County Commissioners will annually pass a resolution recognizing
October as National Arts and Humanities Month .
Policy 11 . 6 The County shall support the sale of the State of the Arts license plates through the
distribution of flyers , and posters in license tag offices .
October 16 , 2001
93
BK 9 PG U 6 2
NF t C• t f
m
fe
I
ifIfaIJ-
N 5ffiff s . vra xr , ia'"a
4° r >'. dw.'C . > z+'- Vb°4§
d,,;- i $. 1 '3'°il't . t s aX k y n r z v.av
If ix
r , srr. , z .+ II,. . ,. .1 wr M` ,w ., ,t 4 54v .:.avIfIxr' 45,'*Tt '?r ' .5 .., ". .it
11
9 . A . 5 . PUBLIC HEARING - ORDINANCE NO . 2001 - 029 - COUNTY-
INITIATED REQUEST TO AMEND THE TEXT OF THE FUTURE
LAND USE ELEMENT OF THE COUNTY ' S COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
TO CREATE A T TRANSITIONAL RESIDENTIAL LAND USE
DESIGNATION ( CLONTZ/BEUTTELL) (Legislative)
PROOF OF PUBLICATION IS ON FILE
IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
Community Development Director Robert M . Keatingreviewed a Memorandum of
October 8 , 2001 with a Power Point® outline to aid in his presentation . He advised that this
ordinance is dependent upon the next one ( 9 . A . 6 . ) and vice versa .
TO : James E . Chandler ; County Administrator
DYPNRTTVIENT HEAD CONCURRENCE
Robert M. Keating, AICP ; onununity evelopment Director
THROUGH : Sasan Rohani , AICP ; Chief, Lon - /ange Planning ':: .
FROM : John Wachtel ; Senior Planner, Long- Range Planning
DATE October S , 2001
RE : County Initiated Request to Amend The Text of The Future Land Use Element
of The County ' s Comprehensive Plan to Create a T, Transitional Residential ,
Land Use Designation
PLAN AMENDMENT NUMBER : CPTA 2001 - 01 - 0111
It is requested that the data herein presented be given formal consideration by the Board of CountyCommissionersatitsregularmeetingofOctober16 , 2001 .
INTRODUCTION
This is a county initiated request to amend the text of the future land use element of the county ' s
comprehensive plan to create a T, Transitional Residential ( up to 1 unit/acre ; or up to 3 units/acre
for Planned Development Projects ) , land use designation . The proposed revisions to the plan are
shown on Attachment 3 .In that attachment, deletions are indicated by , while
additions are shown as double underlined .
The proposed amendment states that the T designation is intended for land that serves as a transition
area between urban and agriculturally designated land .The proposed amendment limits the T
designation to property that meets all of the following criteria :
October 16 , 2001
94
ell
ll
e : p' r ai
b J
77 wv
t
If i
It
If
ff-
If
of
r
3
Vf
d 4`. 1 .
t Y ... .
4
a ez N1 t " i . x. a .
y
tIle
ug n g?F'kY„swy. :x fV +# ^,yn a,i{ Y,3, 3 E a 1Y X _ fr w ,
4
1i A
it must abut an arterial road that contains county water and sewer lines within the road ' s
right- of- way ;
it must abut corrunercial/industrial designated property ; and
it must be at least 20 acres in size .
Currently , there are ± 164 . 1 acres , in 3 separate tracts , in the county that meet the above criteria.
Additionally , the proposed amendment places the following special regulations on T designated land :
Caribbean Fruit Fly host plants are prohibited .
When platting lots in residential projects , the land owner must place a statement on the plat
and on the deed of each lot . That statement must inform the lot buyer of the Florida Right
to Farm Act , and that active farm operations occur nearby .
BACKGROUND
On July 11 , 2000 , the Board of County Commissioners considered a request by Gerald Clontz to
amend the comprehensive plan future land use map designation of his property from AG- 1 ,
Agricultural - 1 ( up to 1 rmit/5 acres ) , to M- 1 , Medium- Density Residential- 1 ( up to 8 units/acre) ; and
to expand the urban service area to include his property . Although the Board denied the request by
a 5 to 0 vote , the Board indicated a desire to "find some relief for Mr . Clontz . " The Board also
acknowledged that, because the circumstances affecting the Clontz property were similar to the
circumstances affecting many other properties in the county , action taken on the Clontz property
would have countywide implications . For those reasons , the Board instructed staff to continue to
study the issue and present alternatives to the Board . Those alternatives were presented to the Board
and discussed at a special workshop meeting held on October 9 , 2000 .
At the October 9" workshop , staff presented several land use and urban service area alternatives .
In addition to staff' s alternatives , Mr. Clontz ' s attorney , Michael O ' Haire , presented a proposal to
the Board for creating a " transitional " area for land meeting certain criteria. Attachment 2 is the
specific proposal presented by Mr. O ' Haire . By increasing the number of residential units that could
be built on property that meets certain criteria, Mr. O ' Haire ' s proposal gave relief to Mr . Clontz .
Specifically , the proposal was to establish a new "T , Transitional Residential" land use designation
for property that meets the following criteria :
1 ) The property is currently designated AG- 1 ;
2 ) The property abuts the urban service area ;
3 ) The property abuts a commercial/industrial node ;
4) The property fronts on an arterial road ;
5 ) Utility lines for both water and sewer are available at the property boundary ; and
6) The property is at least 20 acres in size .
As presented, Mr . O ' Haire ' s proposed land use designation would have allowed land to be rezoned
to a zoning district that permits densities of up to 1 unit/acre or, if developed as a Planned
Development ( PD ) , up to 3 units/acre . Mr. O ' Haire ' s proposal also included expanding the urban
service area to include T designated land .
Recognizing that such a proposal needed technical analysis , the Board instructed staff to review ,
analyze , and " clean- up " the proposal ; and report back to the Board .
October 16 , 2001
95
t i
it) or
3 6 Lie
4
IIJ
x o
16
26 wS e
s s
As instructed , staff reported to the Board at the December 12 , 2000 , Board of County Commissioners
Meeting . At that meeting , staff presented several alternatives to the Board. After much discussion ,
the Board directed staff to process a county initiated text amendment and a county initiated future
land use map amendment for the January 2001 Plan Amendment Submittal Window . Additionally ,
the Board told staff that those amendments were to implement Mr . O ' Haire7s proposal . The Board,
however, stated that it did not wish to preclude the Planning and Zoning Commission from
considering any alternatives , and that the Board would consider any alternatives recommended by
the Planning and Zoning Commission .
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION ACTION
On April 5 , 2001 , the Planning and Zoning Commission (PZC ) considered this item at a public
hearing .At that meeting , several alternatives were presented to the PZC .Although all seven
members of the Commission were present, two members filed Conflict of Interest forms because
those members have interests in property affected by the item. As a result of the conflicts , the two
affected members could participate in the discussion , but could not vote on this item .
Regarding this item, two motions were made at the Planning and Zoning Commission meeting . The
first motion was to recommend that the Board of County Commissioners adopt the O ' Haire
Proposal , with the following three additions :
prohibition of Caribbean Fruit Fly host plants ;
required notification of the Florida Right to Farm Act ; and
150 foot wide buffers .
That motion failed on a 2 to 3 vote .
The second motion was to recommend that the Board of County Cominissioners delay any decision
on this , while continuing to study other alternatives , including the alternative of concentrating
development around rural villages . The Planning and Zoning Commission voted 3 to 2 to in favor
of the second motion .
Although a majority of Planning and Zoning Commissioners eligible to vote voted in favor of the
motion , Section 103 . 02 . 12 of the County Code of Laws and Ordinances states that any matter or
application considered by a board or commission with more than five members must receive four
or more votes for passage . Since the Planning and Zoning Commission has seven members and the
subject motion received only three affirmative votes , the favorable recommendation technically
failed.
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ADVISORY COMMITTEE ACTION
On May 17 , 2001 , the Professional Services Advisory Committee (PS AC) considered the proposed
amendment and several other alternatives . At that meeting the PSAC voted 9 to 0 to recommend that
the Board of County Commissioners choose one of the other alternatives .
TRANSMITTAL HEARING
On June 5 , 2001 , the Board of County Commissioners considered several alternatives for transmittal
to the Florida Department of Community Affairs (DCA) for their review . Eventually , the Board
voted 3 to 2 to transmit the subject amendment ( drawn primarily from Mr. O ' Haire ' s proposal ,
although incorporating portions of a staff developed proposal ) .
October 16 , 2001
96
id r i!i A k.+
e
5-F e
La
2 <
5 h
i}?u , ws' °. t3r .. J 1,}h,..c3 o =S x, er "'q.G x .r-
r, k Jr. : 2 .3 t wY
ORC REPORT
Consistent with state regulations , DCA reviewed the proposed amendment and prepared an
Objections , Recommendations and Comments ( ORC ) Report (dated August 17 , 2001 ) , which
planning staff received on August 20, 2001 . The DCA ORC Report, Attachment 7 at the end of this
staff report, does not contain any objections or comments relating to the proposed amendment .
ANALYSIS
This section includes an analysis of the proposed amendment. This section also includes a
discussion of the amendment ' s consistency with the comprehensive plan .
REASONABLENESS OF THE PROPOSED AMENDMENT
By creating an urban land use designation that is narrowly structured to include only a few
properties , the proposed amendment allows the county to provide relief for Mr. Clontz without
encouraging urban sprawl or allowing the large scale conversion of agricultural land to suburban
land .
As structured, the proposed amendment contains certain provisions that will increase compatibility
between AG - 1 designated and T designated land. Two of those provisions are the prohibition of
Caribbean Fruit Fly host plants on T designated land , and the requirement that buyers of T
designated platted lots be provided notification of the Florida Right to Farm Act and of the existence
of agricultural activities occurring nearby .
Another provision that will increase compatibility between AG- I designated and T designated land
is the incentive to use the PD process when developing T designated land (PD development in T
designated areas may occur at a 3 units/acre density compared to the 1 unit/acre density allowed by
non- PD development) . With the PD process , the Board has the right to require site design elements
that mitigate impacts . Those elements can include berms , buffers , fences , and the siting of buildings ,
storm water management areas , and open space .
Additionally , the limited urban service area expansion associated with the proposed amendment
allows the county to continue to study other altematives .
As structured , the proposed amendment provides relief for Mr . Clontz , does not encourage urban
sprawl , does not increase incompatibilities , and allows further study and/or actions to address the
problem of development at the edge of the urban service area . For those reasons , the proposed
amendment is reasonable .
CONSISTENCY WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
Staff reviews each comprehensive plan amendment request for consistency with all applicable
policies of the comprehensive plan . As per Section 800 . 07 ( 1 ) of the county code , the
comprehensive plan may only be amended in such a way as to preserve the internal consistency of
the plan pursuant to Section 163 . 3177 ( 2 ) F . S . "
The goals , objectives and policies are the most important parts of the comprehensive plan . Policies
are statements in the plan which identify the actions which the county will take in order to direct the
community ' s development . As courses of action committed to by the county , policies provide the
basis for all county land development related decisions --including plan amendment decisions .
October 16 , 2001
97
6e 3 X60
611777770771,
t
61
e t w
I e {
FZ
M1.
ss
a e ., o"'se" _
r
s ,_ •.E v.,
sE.. i n. : . L xis lz
r
i,. I -g. taR uS ,
1
While all comprehensive plan policies are important, some have more applicability than others in
reviewing plan amendment requests . Future Land Use Element Policy 14 . 3 , however, is applicable
to all plan amendment requests . For that reason , this section will begin with a discussion of how the
proposed amendment is consistent with Future Land Use Element Policy 14 . 3 .
Future Land Use Element Policy 14 .3
In evaluating any comprehensive plan text amendment request, the most important consideration is
Future Land Use Element Policy 14 . 3 . This policy requires that at least one of three criteria be met
in order to approve a comprehensive plan text amendment . These criteria are :
the proposed amendment corrects a mistake in the approved plan ;
the proposed amendment corrects an oversight in the approved plan ; or
the proposed amendment is warranted based on a substantial change in circumstances .
In this instance , the proposed amendment meets Future Land Use Element Policy 14 . 3 's second
criterion . That criterion states that the proposed amendment will correct an oversight in the
approved plan . In this case , the oversight was that certain lands were excluded from the urban
service area and given an agricultural land use designation despite the fact that certain characteristics
of those lands indicated that they should have been included in the urban service area and given an
urban land use designation .
The Board of County Commissioners has determined that land that meets the following criteria
should have been included in the urban service area and given an urban designation :
the property abuts an arterial road that contains county water and sewer lines within the
road ' s right- of- way ;
the property abuts commercial/industrial designated property ; and
the property is at least 20 acres in size .
An oversight occurred when land that meets the above criteria was designated agricultural and
excluded from the urban service area. The proposed amendment corrects that oversight by creating
an urban land use designation category for land that meets the above criteria . For that reason, the
proposed amendment meets Future Land Use Element Policy 14 . 3 's second criterion and is consistent
with Future Land Use Element Policy 14 . 3 .
Consistency Summary
As part of its consistency analysis , staff compared the proposed amendment to all applicable
objectives and policies in the plan and found no conflicts . Therefore , the proposed amendment is
consistent with the comprehensive plan .
CONCLUSION
The proposed amendment is reasonable , meets the Board ' s objectives , and is consistent with the
comprehensive plan . For those reasons , the proposed amendment meets all plan amendment criteria .
October 16 , 2001
98
67,g
777777777TW 7777F"
11 In,
t
ri vc
77 1
11
N.
aif
r ,
Ii`Si
n'F, "F A k2iA'v' w l ti nit', `^ a. ,s , t ,Z, s at 4ftt
r s . . ,fi
It
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners review the information and determine
whether or not to approve the proposed amendment . If the Board chooses to approve the proposed
amendment, the Board should adopt the attached ordinance .
ATTACHMENTS
1 .Comprehensive Plan Text Amendment Application
2 .Mr . O ' Haire ' s Proposal for a Transitional Area
3 .Proposed Text Changes to the Comprehensive Plan
4 .Approved Minutes of the April 5 , 2001 , Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting
5 .Approved Minutes of the May 17 , 2001 , Professional Services Advisory Committee Meeting
6 . Approved Minutes of the June 5 , 2001 , Board of County Commissioners Meeting
7 .DCA ' s ORC Report
8 .Comprehensive Plan Text Amendment Ordinance
Commissioner Macht noted the absence of a staff recommendation .
Vice Chairman Stanbridge understood that the Department of Community Affairs
DCA) did not consider this proposed amendment to be spot zoning, and Director Keating
responded that he thought DCA would not have considered it spot zoning because it is
contiguous to the existing Urban Service Area . Vice Chairman Stanbridge also understood
that each of the three parcels are adjacent to Commercial/Industrial and they are all different
sizes of C/I and in various stages of being built out, and Director Keating advised that she
was correct .
County Attorney Bangel mentioned he had suggested changing the word
agricultural " to "farm " when he reviewed the ordinance , in order to be consistent with the
Florida Right-to -Farm Act ( Sec . 823 . 14) uses and he further suggested citing the same in the
ordinance .
Chairman Ginn understood there was no way to give Mr . Clontz relief without
adopting these ordinances and Director Keating responded that Mr . O ' Haire ' s suggestions
will limit the expansion of the Urban Service Area because of the special criteria .
October 16 , 2001
99
if
frfl,_
II 4
u
5 n
44
Vice Chairman Stanbridge explained that she looked at Mr . Clontz ' property as a
pressure point " which the Board helped to create by putting commercial next to hisa
property . That particular commercial area has built out now ; it may be 20 years or more
before the other C/I properties are built out .She asked if there might be some way to add
to the criteria so there will be time before there is another "pressure point " . She expounded
on the Comprehensive Plan as not being a static plan .
Based on experience , Commissioner Macht thought passage today will ensure
additional requests for "relief ' .He failed to see what the proximity of commercial had to
do with the ability to farm .He thought "being able to farm " is being confused with "not
wishing to farm " . The fatality built into this proposal is that while 1 unit/acre sounds good,
it is widely known that it can come back as a "PD " with 3 units/acre and it will be approved .
Once this proposal is passed , he believed the Board will be seeing glutted roads and
higgledy-piggledy" expansion all through the western part of the county .
The Chairman opened the public hearing and asked if anyone wished to be heard in
this matter .
Michael O ' Haire , attorney with offices at 311 Cardinal Drive , Vero Beach 32963 ,
representing the applicant, stated that Mr . Bangel ' s suggested changes were acceptable to
the applicant . This application has received an exhaustive review by staff and staff has
isolated three areas that will be impacted by the change (the properties of Mr . Clontz, Mr .
Beuttell , and the property in which Norm Hensick and George Hamner have an interest) .
He hoped this would be the final public hearing on this application and asked that both
proposals be approved . He stated the Mr . Clontz has farmed the property and it was farmed
for 40 years by his family . This is a case of not being able to farm . In response to
October 16 , 2001
100
a
2 d
i
d
VV 11
VV
3f r :
v
F" tl
tX Y s.,sf { f , aE 11 1: ... y ae i v ry
VV, t z '
Chairman Ginn ' s inquiry , Mr . O ' Haire advised that there are cattle on the Beuttell property
and a citrus grove on the Clontz property . He was unsure of the state of the other property .
B . J. McClure, 395 Nieuport Drive , Vero Beach 32968 , lives near the Beuttell
property .He thought the issue in this matter is truth versus fiction and felt there was a lot
of fiction in the air . After the last hearing, he thought all the properties were in trouble
because they could no longer be used for agricultural purposes .Having read all the staff
reports and backup materials , he realized there were a lot of statements which might be true
in a very general sense , but were very misleading . If any relief is needed, it would the
Clontz property and not Beuttell ' s . He refuted several recent comments and stated that the
third property has some of the finest looking citrus groves in the county with a nice packing
plant . He predicted that if the Commission approves the amendments , the pressure point
will just move to the south and the domino effect will take place . He reminded the
Commissioners of some of the truths written in the staff report of June 30 , 2000 . He noted
staff s lack of recommendation today and asked that the Board reject this amendment .
Ken Hendrix , 6220 1 " Street, SW , Vero Beach 32968 ,wished he could convince
the Commissioners to vote against this . He believed the Board felt they had caused the
problem Mr . Clontz is now experiencing . Mr . Hendrix and others bought property and live
in the area relying on the Comprehensive Plan to prohibit high density development .He
now knows the Comprehensive Plan map does not mean too much , but asked why it was
done if it was not going to have any meaning . He felt that Mr . O ' Haire has done a
marvelous job for Mr . Clontz and figured others can hire a "bull dog " to do the same .He
felt this deviation from the Comprehensive Plan would be a big mistake which will cause
neighbors to be against neighbors which he hated to see .
John Schumann , 1320 Old Dubloon Drive , Vero Beach 32963 , expressed concerns
of growth in conflict with the Aerodrome ' s buffer .He is building a home there and also
October 16 , 2001
101
4 7 0
If
If
114
fl-
If
n . c aY vit , d2IfI ' ll
fW
owns 80 acres of agriculturally- zoned property on 82 "d Avenue between 1St Street SW and
5 " Street SW .He believes there must be a better solution to this dilemma because it will
lead to a population influx . He related how the Aerodrome was built in a remote area of the
county so it would surrounded by buffering lands zoned both agricultural and commercial .
It was built with the intention of avoiding conflict with people on nearby properties who
would object to the noise . He enumerated sacrifices made by Aerodrome residents to live
there and that they relied on the County to maintain the Comprehensive Plan . He feared that
allowing additional development nearby will bring an excessive number ofp eop le which
will surely result in complaints about aircraft noise and conflict that the County Commission
might be faced with resolving in the future . He believed this was not a proper way to solve
the problem of a citrus grower whose property is miles closer to town on 58 "' Avenue .
Karen Crowe , 255 W . 27 " Street, New York City 10001 , advised her family has a
citrus grove directly to the south of Mr . Clontz ' . Her concerns were operation of that grove
and community planning of the area . She thought 58t"
Avenue creates a visual boundary and
with the creation of a T , the logical and physical boundary line will be blurred and will push
the problem further toward the agricultural property down the road If the boundary is
going to be blurred , it might make sense to look for another physical boundary which she
thought might be the church (Church of God) which already has an elementary school and
is proposing an intermediate and high school . She indicated she inight be looking for relief
also if this boundary is not stabilized .
Phil Hipe , 345 Nieuport Drive , 32968 , was trying to preserve the way of life he chose
15 years ago .He was opposed to a subdivision along 82 "' Avenue .He felt this proposal
was wrong . He suggested the money be taken out of the equation and suggested the Board
do what is best for their neighbors and friends because the people are the backbone of Indian
River County .
October 16 , 2001
102
T b Zd
t
tts3v . }+y,,sr
c. J< 'xG¢,f'$ v b"'t':Y iw r a. wt` l t
e tt
George Beuttell , 5000 16 `" Street, Vero Beach, wanted to point out that even though
there is not a citrus grove at the location , 360 acres of citrus groves have been abandoned
in that vicinity . He felt that was proof that citrus groves cannot be operated in the area . He
felt it was fairness for him to be able to use his property at its highest and best use . The
people who live in the Aerodrome live on one unit per acre and this proposal would only
give him that same ability to be able to develop his property .
Isabel Dayton , 4220 6t"
Lane, 32968 , advised that her father bought property prior
to the Aerodrome and he did not protest when it came in ; she was sorry the Aerodrome
people were opposed to this change .She spoke of change and how people must be able to
adjust to change .
Jim Young, 400 Sopwith Drive , 32968 , has moved north as development has come
in to areas where he lived in south Florida . It did not look like something like this was going
to occur when he moved to the Aerodrome about 13 years ago .He left Dade County and
other counties and sees the same things happening here . He was against this proposal .He
felt 3 units/acre is very high density and will cause a lot of problems .
David Gay ,1465 6 " Street , who owns property along
151 Street SW near 82 "
Avenue , was of the understanding that this area was outside of the urban service area and
would remain that . He felt there is plenty of land within the urban service area now that is
not being utilized .The reason for this proposal is more for profit and it could be used for
viable agriculture , even though it might not be citrus . He felt there are others willing to use
it for agricultural purposes , or no one would object to 1 unit per 5 acres .There should be
more reason to change property designation than just to increase profits . He feared adjacent
parcels would soon be developed and it would not be long before his property would be
encroached upon by developments .
Gwen Garner, 8520 Waco Way , 32968 , advised that as of 9 am , there were over
i
October 16 , 2001
103
Ery f a t3 7 L
N
15
r
IL
a ,t
2 , 000 single - family lots less than one -third of an acre available for sale in Indian River
County . There is no shortage . In comparison , there are only 5 single - family lots of 5 acres
in the whole of Indian River County . For those who wish to raise families in the rural areas ,
there is very limited availability . She stated that if the Board allows the change , they will
have failed the entire community .
It was determined that no one else wished to be heard and the Chairman closed the
public hearing .
Vice Chairman Stanbridge stated that she did not consider Mr . Beuttell ' s property a
pressure point, only Mr . Clontz ' property .
Commissioner Macht felt there was confusion on the term "highest and best use " and
it should be said with "under the law" added . There is a great difference . Private property
rights mean the quiet enjoyment of the property you own , not the right to be enriched by it .
Government is not about doing everything in its power to upgrade the use of a property or
to enhance the value .Giving relief to Mr . Clontz is not the business of the Board ; it is the
Board ' s business to apply the law . Breaching the urban service area because someone made
a decision not to fann is anon-sequitur , The Board cannot legislate based on relationships .
The Board has not by legislation devalued Mr. Clontz ' property . He agreed that once this
is done , the death knell will be sounded for the county ' s reputation for low density and
orderly development .He hoped the Board would not make the change .
MOTION WAS MADE by Commissioner Macht, SECONDED
by Chairman Ginn , to deny the request .
October 16 , 2001
104
U 4J 7 v
i' si E fi 1
y f y 3
F
If -'
IF
f I 'll
I IF
a
4 +'..,
s^ '.eC:S, y 3 ,+ r vIr Y
dIF fII IFaOF, I E d. r} f»aye , ' " " 1< v W;° F , Ti fi ti x°3,x, kt .i a,n* ti°n
ake
7
If
If
Under discussion , Commissioner Adams believed everything the Board does is
subjective and recounted how the urban service area lines came about . She thought the
County had made an error by not having commercial , then multi - family , then single - family,
and then agriculture , the utopia of planning . Then along came traditional neighborhood
designed communities . She felt the issue was that the urban service area has been
continually breached along 58 "' Avenue . She thought the proposal before the Board was an
attempt at a solution , but was unsure if it was a satisfactory solution . She wondered if some
measure of safety, a definite criteria, could be added to it that when the adjoining urban
service area develops to a certain degree , then the relief would "kick in " for that acreage .
She understood Ms . Crowe ' s concern about the future about the high school which is to
established on the church ' s property . Commissioner Adams understood and explained why
people have chosen not to farm .
Chairman Ginn pointed out this would allow one unit/acre and if a PD were
developed it would be 3 units/acre , which is fairly dense .
Commissioner Adams recalled that the PD would require certain buffers which would
not be required without the PD .
Vice Chairman Stanbridge recounted some of the process the Planning Board went
through when creating the Comprehensive Plan and the commercial nodes . Good planning
practices were primary concerns , but in this area it was not done . It worked fine when it was
first beginning to build out, but now that commercial node is built out to the point of
complete awareness of the commercial development at 58 "' Avenue and SR 60 by everyone
including the neighbors .That area is now a "pressure point " , but the other two areas have
not yet been affected by build- out . She wished to see language incorporated that the abutted
commercially designated property had to show some percentage of build- out . Then a
pressure point" would be triggered and relief should be granted .Mr . Beuttell ' s property
October 16 , 2001
105
it i s i7 4
r
IfIf
Ifrr
r
Y777
3111111
91 1
rL
119
f :.
J
iG + . . ..'d' Q' rl x
S'..K
66
may end up having to be re - designated as commercial should the node near him require
expansion . More pressure points will come along . This is not a perfect solution nor was the
Comprehensive Plan , but we have to work with what we have . She still felt that Mr . Clontz '
property has a problem .
Chairman Ginn felt approval of this will only create additional "pressure points "
further to the south .
Vice Chairman Stanbridge disagreed because other properties are not next to
commercial , but are buffered . If this were being done earlier, multi - family could have been
put there .
Chairman Ginn thought there will still be complaints about spraying and traffic
impact . She felt people have purchased property relying on the Comprehensive Plan .
Changes mean more changes and she could not support the change being discussed . She felt
it would be opening Pandora ' s box .
Commissioner Tippin wished he did not have to vote on this because he preferred
things the way they were when there were 5 houses between 27 " and 43 `d
on Rebel Road . .
When working on the Comprehensive Plan , it was like giving breach birth to a porcupine .
All the State officials said they were going to use it as a model , it was the best they had ever
seen . Ten years later, the same bureaucracy called it "urban sprawl " . He supports the
change, but not the motion on the floor .
Commissioner Adams thought if the motion fails , perhaps a trigger percentage could
be implemented .
When asked how that might be implemented, Director Keating directed their attention
to page 307 , Attachment A (to the ordinance) , verbiage could be added to the last sentence
as follows : . . . " and if the adjacent commercial/industrial node is developed at least 70 % or
more . . . " .
October 16 , 2001
106
x
Szr h e f z
r
A
el
el
11 Ile
ee,
Jel h 4 k t
el I
ell I1
5. : '<. e .. f£F'. 5b mr ire rL wtiii :+ e ' . , =, k 5 .Y T +l X 'ib i' q t 9 { 4 f P *mlev sa', a .x . , '> >
y,, s s n,. r' ;' 5! `_'. ,yYxr .Yr1„gL, ai'^a`S d ey . . 4,.Ya q f t, yye
e
le 11 114
There was a brief discussion and consensus was reached that it be 70 % , rather than
another percentage .
THE CHAIRMAN CALLED THE QUESTION and the motion
failed (2 - 3 , Chairman Ginn and Commissioner Macht in favor,
Commissioners Adams , Stanbridge , and Tippin opposed . ) .
MOTION WAS MADE by Commissioner Adams ,
SECONDED BY Commissioner Tippin , to adopt the proposed
ordinance with an amendment requiring the adjacent
commercial/industrial property had to be 70 % built out in order
to trigger the changes .
Under discussion , Chairman Ginn recognized Mr . O ' Haire who suggested that the
70 % trigger be used for the PD process .
After a brief discussion , this suggestion was added to the motion and the motion was
restated .
THE CHAIRMAN CALLED THE QUESTION and the motion
carried by a 3 -2 vote (Chairman Ginn and Commissioner Macht
opposed) . Adopted Ordinance No . 2001 - 029 amending the
Future Land Use Element of the Comprehensive Plan to create
a new T , Transitional Residential [ up to 1 unit/acre ; or up to 3
units/acre for Planned Development projects ] , Land Use
Designation and providing for severability and effective date ;
with the additional amendment to the proposed ordinance that
the adjacent commercial/industrial node must be 70 % built - out .
October 16 , 2001
107
sit FG 8 7 6
aIleW17
Ile" l -
Ile e
el
I
lee
11
c
v
r ;A
I
INIIN
IN
ENNIs `
3 1
y 1
f 5 i }2
I
I aIN
y 'Si; .gf
2 t ..wm v z r. k a rY,"#. *^
4 " ' #2.3"` v5a '.q'+' r t . z . . f 'K t 1 7^a
z, f a.,. M1r+,v,+t' u. .
r „ s . ,.` t” as . «
y ' rSzx
IN IN q3" E.
iso`
cN
ORDINANCE NO . 2001 -029
AN ORDINANCE OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY , FLORIDA, AMENDING THE FUTURE LAND
USE ELEMENT OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TO CREATE A NEW T, TRANSITIONAL
RESIDENTIAL (UP TO 1 UNIT/ACRE ; OR UP TO 3 UNITS /ACRE FOR PLANNED
DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS ) , LAND USE DESIGNATION ; AND PROVIDING
SEVERABILITY AND EFFECTIVE DATE .
WHEREAS , the Board of County Commissioners adopted the Indian River County
Comprehensive Plan on February 13 , 1990, and
WHEREAS , the county received comprehensive plan amendment applications during its
January 2001 amendment submittal window , and
WHEREAS , the Local Planning Agency held a public hearing on all comprehensive plan
amendment requests on April 5 , 2001 , after due public notice , and
WHEREAS ,the Local Planning Agency made a recommendation regarding this
comprehensive plan amendment to the Board of County Commissioners , and
WHEREAS , the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County held a Transmittal
Public Hearing on June 5 , 2001 , after advertising pursuant to F. S . 163 . 3184 ( 15 )(b) ( 1 ) and (c) , and
WHEREAS , the Board of County Commissioners approved the transmittal of this
comprehensive plan amendment to the Florida Department of Community Affairs for their review
and comment , and
WHEREAS , the Board of County Commissioners announced at the transmittal public hearing
its intention to hold and advertise a final public hearing at the adoption stage of this plan amendment,
and
WHEREAS , the Florida Department of Community Affairs received this Comprehensive
Plan Amendment on June 11 , 2001 , for the State review pursuant to F. S . 163 . 3184(4 ) , and
WHEREAS , Indian River County received the Objections , Recommendations , and
Comments (ORC) Report from the Florida Department of Community Affairs on August 20, 2001 ,
and
WHEREAS , the ORC Report contained no objections regarding this Comprehensive Plan
Amendment , and
October 16 , 2001
108
r
11?
INN
INj
IN
IN
n
IN
fee `II77
KG
2
11
a 4 i Yy Y 1+! th fellua :' y Y 5 f .1.ff i
11
G+.v r.A' 1' N'
l S `N31 yFS hf
f . ,
d
k"T Eve 5 t ..«
fee
1 A "
Ile Z-
dr 3t yI, fee Is x n .' N
Lr
rY3L`
eget r gwf `
I If x'r e` "r. .. tg,;,if "I Y x, g4 TgcYa £ d . 'kf Yti .
ORDINANCE NO . 2001 - 029
WHEREAS , the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County held a
Comprehensive Plan Amendment Adoption Public Hearing on October 16 , 2001 , after advertising
pursuant to F. S . 163 . 3184 ( 15 ) (b) ;
NOW, THEREFORE , BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of County Commissioners of Indian
River County , Florida, that :
SECTION 1 . Comprehensive Plan Amendment Adoption and Transmittal
The amendment to the Indian River County Comprehensive Plan identified in Section 2 isherebyadopted, and three (3) copies are directed to be transmitted to the State of Florida DepartmentofCommunityAffairsandone ( 1 ) copy is directed to be transmitted to the Treasure Coast RegionalPlanningCouncil .
SECTION 2 . Amendments to the Comprehensive Plan
The following changes are made to the Future Land Use Element of the Comprehensive Plan :
1 .Policy 1 . 2 is revised as shown in Attachment A .
2 .New Policies 1 . 42 , 1 . 43 , and 1 . 44 , as shown in Attachment A , are added .3 . Table 2 . 13 is revised as shown in Attachment A .
SECTION 3 . Repeal of Conflicting Provisions
All previous ordinances , resolutions , or motions of the Board of County Commissioners ofIndianRiverCounty , Florida which conflict with the provisions of this ordinance are hereby repealedtotheextentofsuchconflict.
SECTION 4 . Severability
It is declared to be the intent of the Board of County Commissioners that if any provision ofthisordinanceandtherefore , the Indian River County Comprehensive Plan Amendment is for anyreasonfinallyheldinvalidorunconstitutionalbyanycourtofcompetentjurisdictishallon , such provision
validityty deemed a separate , distinct and independent provision and such holding shall not affect theoftheremainingprovisions .
SECTION 5 . Effective Date
The effective date of this ordinance , and therefore , this plan amendment, shall be the date afinalorderisissuedbytheDepartmentofCommunityAffairsorAdministrationCommissionfindingtheamendmentincompliancewithSection163 . 3184 ( 1 ) (b) , Florida Statutes , whichever occursearlier. No development orders , development permits , or land uses dependent on this amendmentmaybeissuedorcommencebeforeithasbecomeeffective . If a final order of noncompliance isissuedbytheAdministrationCommission , this amendment may nevertheless be made effective byadoptionatapublicmeetingafterpublicnoticeofaresolutionaffirmingitseffectivestatus , a copyofwhichresolutionshallbesenttotheFloridaDepartmentofCommunityAffairs , Division ofResourcePlanningandManagement , Plan Processing Team .
October 16 , 2001
109
U 1
1
effIle
f
el, Iele fe
obi
k 'l vfi, r L
r"'t e v ur C . ,a .. .r s , t 'n S sF '.. a' J" . . t r d. T ' ei :. P 4 ,,ze rp
x . a . v fX"?Lg' f , .: 2y. '""` aa p ?; G x, I zk, .. i. k 9 #'„c 3 n '^v`yb SY, din zit'` , c` a . :.
ti '
If 4 If
ORDINANCE NO . 2001 -029
This ordinance was advertised in the Press -Journal on the
3rd
day of October, 2001 , for a
public hearing to be held on the 16`h
day of October, 2001 , at which time it was moved for adoption
by Cormnissioner Adams seconded by Commissioner Ti ppi n and
adopted by the following vote :
Chairman Caroline D . Ginn Nay
Vice -Chairman Ruth M . Stanbridge Aye
Commissioner Fran B . Adams Aye
Commissioner Kenneth R . Macht Nay
Commissioner John W. Tippin Aye
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
BY : ZIr
Caroline D . Ginn ,
Chairs
an
ATTEST G/hc •
1 Jeffrey K. Barton , Clerk
t-
Acknowledgment by the Department of State of the State of Florida this 6 day of 2001
Acknowledgment from the Department of State received on this qday of 2001 , at
A .MJf. and filed in the office of the Clerk of the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River
County , Florida .
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGAL SUFFICIENCY
w4lh C—all County Attorney
APPROVED AS TO PLANNING MATTERS
Indian River Co. Approved Date
t
Admin . J v
EggRobertM . Keating , AICPCommunityDevelopmentDirector
October 16 , 2001
110
rMIRK77,
tIf If
If If
If
Iv If If
n ra4 n . . c
IIII ' Ile
If
If If,
A T
rfa
A ^ tr { n. ^'
sz N£ T d` w!
W3rt
z a 'n 5 s 8Pr r IIIn
c
f r ae. r 4`
wain
a 4 „ 5^ vIfff,
r vd4 x 'yw Y' q-5kary„,
ORDINANCE NO . 2001 - 029
ATTACHMENT A
Future Land Use Element
Policv 1 .2 : Indian River County hereby adopts the following land use designations to be depicted
on the Future Land Use Map :
C- 1 , Conservation- 1 (zero density)
C - 2 , Conservation -2 ( up to 1 unit/40 acres )
C - 3 , Conservation-3 (up to 1 unit/21h acres)
AG - 1 , Agriculture - I (up to 1 unit/5 acres)
AG-2 , Agriculture-2 ( up to 1 unit/ 10 acres )
AG- 3 , Agriculture- 3 ( up to 1 unit/20 acres)
R, Rural Residential (up to 1 unit/acre )
T . Transitional Residential ( up to 1 unit/acre ; or up to 3 units/acre for Planned Development
Projects)
L- 1 , Low -Density Residential- 1 ( up to 3 units/acre )
L -2 , Low -Density Residential - 2 ( up to 6 units/acre)
M- 1 , Medium- Density Residential- 1 ( up to 8 units/acre)
M -2 , Medium- Density Residential -2 ( up to 10 unit/acre )
BCID , Blue Cypress Improvement District ( up to 10 unit/acre)
C/I, Commercial/Industrial
RC , Regional Commercial
PUB , Public Facilities
REC , Recreation
Mixed Use (floating land use designation ; not depicted on the future land use map)
Policy 1 .42 : The Transitional Residential Land Use designation may be applied to those areas which
serve as a transition area between urban and agriculturally designated land and are suitable for urban
and suburban scale development. Additionally , Transitional Residential designated land must meet
all of the following criteria :
it must abut an arterial road that contains county water and sewer lines within its (the road ' s)
right- of- way ;
it must abut a commercial/industrial node where at least 70% of the subject node' s land area
less rights-of- way) is developed with non-residential and non-agricultural uses , or approved
for non- residential and non-agricultural development ; and
it must be at least 20 acres in size .
Land that meets all of the above criteria may be included in the urban service area and may be
redesignated to T . Transitional Residential.
October 16 , 2001
111
If
If
If 1 7777, 1
1 1
114
1 : 1 1 1 1 IfY
s
TWIT I'
i.
ITT, uy fu
V, Iv ;+.x jN ,t , v9 s
t P+ *
y tz v 9 ,.. r s t rTTI s a+
IT
e > v, tj tc"` 2, V, - r, .; i ,J a , t 09 a . ! x r yx h.. x .g„Y '?'ztd
ORDINANCE NO . 2001 - 029
Policy 1 . 43 : Development in transitional residential areas shall be limited to the following :
Single-Family Residential Uses
up to 1 unit/acre; or up to 3 units/acre for Planned Development Projects
Recreational Uses
up to 0 . 35 FAR
Public Facilities
up to 0 . 35 FAR
Institutional Uses
up to 0 . 35 FAR
Schools ( not including business and vocational schools )
up to 0. 35 FAR
Excavation Activities
Agricultural Uses (as permitted in Future Land Use Element Policy 6 . 3 )
The FAR of mixed use projects shall be calculated by assigning a portion of the total development
area to each use . The sum of the portions assigned to each use must equal the total development
area. An exception shall be allowed for accessory residential uses within primarily non-residential
projects . That exception shall allow the entire development area to be used to calculate the number
of units allowed, without restricting the amount of development area available for calculating themaximumFARforprimaryuses .
Policy 1 .44 : To mitigate and reduce potential impacts between residential and agricultural uses , the
following special regulations apply within areas designated as Transitional Residential :
Caribbean Fruit Fly host plants shall be prohibited on T designated land .
When platting lots in residential projects on T designated land, the land owner shall place an
informational note on the plat and on the deed of each lot informing interested parties of the
Florida Right to Farm Act, Section 823 . 14, Florida Statutes (2001 ) as amended, and statingthatactivefarmoperationsoccurnearby .
October 16 , 2001
112
BA PG FU3
F
y
t q4
4 '
O
4
lV
L
F
h
it
5'
Y
Zoning
District
It
o
o
0
a
r
mx
t ,
i
r,
Y'
Yk7'
r
x
s
ba
7
kAjsr
r
y
f
C -
1
m'•.
at' . '''
sii
1
4
j ,
r
y
vn
i¢
iii
Y
l
I.
i
r
0
a
C/O
y
lir
F4
C -
3
y~y
1
r
d
iA,,
y
u'
r¢
lP
S
1
liin
t
Y
ygr
S
f
Oil
f
Mill
a
sy
R
t
gyIlkp :
r
31t
4
q
t
ACi -
2
r
F
ioFt
v.
b
a3c
4
i "`
yhY
tit
kir
Y"
e^'
t
1
t
airf
i
h.
J
h'
9p
f {
S
N
AV _
3
z
ry
x
t
imiII
R
Z
H
4S
N,
r
t
t
ag1'
YC.
I
fr1
g
r
a
N
Y
i
m
i9
a
t
4
L —
1
I
er
W
5i
t
Fz
ItR
t
red
Cj
t
t
kARI
2a
i'
taiC
si
a
Y
t
L° '
t
t
t
t
a .
rs- +'
o
Yv
R _
rIt
r +
Z, -
2
Z
L
Yg
pYJ
w
r _
r
t
n
rpt .' "$
s
q `
v11p
llr -
pF '
y'
p ',
A
t
i
Kill.ii
v`;"
r}
tJ ?
a , •.
H
n
S
r
O
Z] ,
y]
o
4
ll
1N
irry11
i,l
9
14t
I
l
tp .
I
r
M -
2
r/
J
CD
NOY
a
t
t
t
t
t
atA ;
SURE,
e '
t-
4lnJ.
moi`
k ,' , °
V!
I
y
IV
LL
C
Off'
i
t ..
tFi
P.
b
t
n . •
1
J
m
a '
W
4M
F9r
B
r
d
s
x
ILL
y
ti
rt
Owl
w
r"
tG,
y`
4
M
r
R
g
d
PUB
l z
4k
m
Ilk
px ,
9
y'
t
t
t
t
t
t
t
t
t
t
t
t
t
t
REC
71d
RC
0i
C^`
C
F
Fv
s
a
s
r,`, '
Fn{
d
T+
e •
kro
G
v
z
r?
A'
a
p '
t
3x`
ar
r .
C}
I
u
q
r
fjk.
n4
u
rT'
A
Xh9
t '
y
q
ryrjr` -
fir
c'ytn ?
tziL
1'
ry"
p','
MIXED
USE
WINN
1 $
b
L":
yW
t
yy--
T
vo
E
t
p
e1Y
e
x
BCI
D
r
tt3C
mr
7
4
Fvi.'
3"
aR,
r
SSM .
f
rv
i
rs ...-.
C-
C
4'
j
p
a
1
ti
drt r 4
TI,
IT
q +. ,,,. . sF d " h ,is TM. y.`, rt z b11 f i
ORDINANCE NO . 2001 - 029
LAND USE DESIGNATION
r-1 N r'1
O I I I I I I I D W P + H
U U U U' 0 0 r7 l U a J UC0
Q H
C
GON
CN
OA
MIN
CL
V IMFJOINCG
x ,;v
CH
IL
MWIGaall a Lou
CON - 1 toM
CON-2
CRVPaTWO -IN
note lowR-BCID
ROSE-4Ural
AIR- 1 r
PD
District permitted
T - District permitted when used as transition from less intense/dense development or consistent with
existing development
Shaded - District not permitted
October 16 , 2001
114
09 10 U
i
y.
F
e
r i
AT APPROXIMATELY 10 : 50 A . M . THE CHAIRMAN
DECLARED A BRIEF RECESS . THE MEETING WAS
RECONVENED AT 11 : 02 A . M . AND CHAIRMAN GINN
ANNOUNCED THAT COMMISSIONER MRCHT HAD TO
LEAVE AND WAS EXCUSED FROM THE REMAINDER
OF THE MEETING . )
9 . A . 6 . PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE NO . 2001 - 030
AMENDING THE FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT BY EXPANDING
THE URBAN SERVICE AREA TO INCLUDE AND CHANGING THE
LAND USE DESIGNATION FOR 30 . 8 ACRES FROM AG - 1
AGRICULTURAL - I TO L TRANSITIONAL RESIDENTIAL , AT THE
SOUTHWEST CORNER OF 58TH AVENUE AND THE MAIN CANAL
Legislative
PROOF OF PUBLICATION IS ON FILE
IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
Community Development Director Robert M . Keating reviewed a Memorandum of
October 3 , 2001 stating that this map amendment would be for only 30 . 8 acres and not 164 . 1
acres .
TO : James E . Chandler ; County Administrator
7E . RMENT HEAD CONCURRENCE
Robert Ni . Beating, AICP ; ommunity D elopment Director
THROUGH : Sasan Rohan , AICP ; Chief, Long- R ee Planning 5- -
o
FROM : John Wachtel ; Senior Planner, Long - Range Planning !/ (/bY
DATE : October 3 , 2001
RE : County Initiated Request to Amend the Comprehensive Plan to Redesignate
164 . 1 Acres from AG - 1 to T ; and to Expand the Urban Service Area to Include
Those 164 . 1 Acres.
PLAN AMENDMENT NUMBER : LUDA 2001 - 01 - 0110
October 16 , 2001
115
4 f
7rII n
vaI.
777
f' laalf ,
If
If If
If40tYl1t`
vf 3i ;Y+ If
f If es3
If I a:
Ifa
FIIf
P v i
i , r° l.. t `- s9
i'"vs sr ,.uh;,a rPS,
It is requested that the data herein presented be given formal consideration by the Board of County
Commissioners at its regular meeting of October 16 , 2001 .
DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS
This request is to amend the Comprehensive Plan to redesignate 164 . 1 acres from AG - 1 ,
Agricultural- I ( up to 1 unid5 acres ) , to T, Transitional Residential ( up to I unit/acre ; or up to 3
units/acre for Planned Development Projects ) ; and to expand the Urban Service Area (USA) to
include those 164 . 1 acres . The subject properties consist of three non-contiguous sites . No rezoning
is associated with this request . The purpose of this request is to provide relief to ownersof
agriculturally designated land located adjacent to the USA, where that land, because of its proximity
to urban development, can no longer feasibly be used for agricultural purposes .
At the October 16 , 2001 , Board of County Commissioners meeting , the Board, prior to considering
this land use amendment, will consider a text amendment that is closely related to this land use
amendment. That text amendment involves the issue of whether or not to establish a new T land use
designation. The Board cannot redesignate land to the T designation unless the Board first approves
a text amendment establishing the T designation .
This request is to redesignate three separate sites containing a total of 164 . 1 acres . The three sites
are referred to as Subject Properties 1 , 2 , and 3 , and are depicted in Figures 1 through 6 . Subject
Properties 1 , 2 , and 3 are related to the text amendment proposal creating the T designation because
they are the only properties in the county that meet the T designation requirements identified in the
text amendment proposal .
Past Actions
At each of the previous meetings associated with this land use amendment, several alternatives ,
including the proposed amendment, were presented by staff to the deliberating body .
On April 5 , 2001 , the Planning and Zoning Commission voted 5 to 0 to recommend that the Board
of County Commissioners deny the proposed land use amendment .
On May 17 , 2001 , the Professional Services Advisory Committee (PSAC) voted 8 to 0 to
recommend that the Board of County Commissioners choose an alternative that has since been
eliminated by the Board . The PSAC recommended alternative would have expanded the urban
service area and applied an urban land use designation to 892 acres (including the subject properties )
in the following three large corridors :
412 acres located on the west side of 58 " Avenue , between the Main Canal and 9 " Street,
SW ;
400 acres located on the east side of 82nd Avenue, between 16" Street and 5" Street, SW ; and
80 acres located on the east side of 74" Avenue , between 9" Street, SW and 13" Street, SW.
On June 5 , 2001 , the Board of County Commissioners voted 3 to 2 to transmit the proposed land use
amendment to the Florida Department of Community Affairs (DCA ) for its review .
ORC Report
Consistent with state regulations , DCA reviewed the proposed amendment and prepared an
Objections , Recommendations and Comments ( ORC ) Report ( dated August 17 , 2001 ) , which
planning staff received on August 20 , 2001 . The DCA ORC Report, Attachment 6 at the end of this
staff report, does not contain any objections or comments relating to the proposed amendment.
October 16 , 2001
116
le
el
It ,
le
k'
el
r - x r .Ae .
F
a'f iIt,
le"
I571
k
ell-
el
te, ell
ell" Y tc,` a '^ tr
eve' el"` } . . ;x .,
y . '
ri
r 'r',. Fikx i
61 1
Subject Property 1
Depicted in Figures 1 and 2 , Subject Property 1 is owned by Gerald R . Clontz, is 30 . 8 acres in size ,
and is located at the southwest corner of 58th Avenue and the Main Canal .
Figure l : Location and Land Use Designation of Subject Property 1
n
TP. t7
TR13 aA
9
A
a a
15th street a
TR.3
f.
R ` A 1
n,
N F
AG - 1 WillA71
3 TA.7 TR.t3 TRS
6
TR.631u
31
Figure I Location and Zoning of Subject Property 1
R 13
CMa``
G
3
a
RM - 6Q t
a RS - 2
T na
nu r
I
15th Street
i I
rR.2 rmsit
ell
L
n ; I Il en, lit
k
Tft.7 TR-8 rRR R.6
s RS - 3
October 16 , 2001
117
Jet I
ell I
le el
ev
It
evl
ell
Subject Property 2
Depicted in Figures 3 and 4 , Subject Property2 is owned by Beuttell Development, LLC , is 76 . 8
acres in size , and is located at the southeast corner of 82 "d Avenue and is' Street, SW .
Figure 3 : Location and Land Use Designation of Subject Property 2
irR14 _ - _- THIS
SR.IS_- .-_- --
7P1'1
I I I
I I
AG - 11
T=
AG - 1
s
TRT
1 — •
9 ' --- TR.B
r
1
lu.
I 1
a L _
5t Streq 'W *
Rio
C14I
Figure 4 : Location and Zoning of Subject Property 2
rg14 - - _— _— _
RIo
I
T i
I I
I
THIS
A4
Tas a
s
3.
A - 1 - 1R TRT
TRT ' -- R9
A4
St Street W .
i
R,;-- -- - -'--- - TRlp --
A4
October 16 , 2001 1 RS - 1
118
3
IWV"F7W7WW 777777,
4
Subject Property 3
Depicted in Figures 5 and 6 , Subject Property 3 is 56 . 5 acres in size . The northern 18 . 2 acres of
Subject Property 3 are owned by Indian River Exchange Packers , Inc . , and are located at the
southeast comer of 74" Avenue and 9" Street, SW ( Oslo Road) . The southern 38 . 3 acres of Subject
Property 3 are owned by Miraflores , Inc . , and are located at the northeast corner of 74" Avenue and
13 `h Street , SW ( Kelly Road ) .
Figure 5 : Location and Land Use Designation of Subject Property 3
C / I
s T8.1
rax AG - 1 !
J- C
TAT
sa ,
cs .N' Me 78.7
h AG - 1
IDL
t
13th Stree S.W .
AG - 1-
PUB
Figure 6 : Location and Zoning of Subject Property 3
IL A - 1
i
TB.L fit ryx LR.i TR1 782
TAz I
m IG
IN
LL
a r tTe
A - 1
TAT
TRA T8.7
JM
V3Z
r
L '
13th Stree S. W .
SAI TALL
I I
A - 1U
WUfITT I wrorw.
P1
A - 1
I I gL g
October 16 , 2001
119
if
r
Existing and Use Pattern
All the subject properties are zoned A - 1 , Agricultural District ( up to 1 unit/5 acres ) .
Subject Property 1
Subject Property 1 consists of citrus groves and a residence in the northwestern part of the site . Westofthesubjectproperty , land is zoned A - 1 and contains residences on 10- acre , heavily wooded lots .South of the subject property , land consists of citrus groves and is zoned A - 1 . East of the subjectproperty , across 58 `h Avenue , land is zoned RS - 2 , Single-Family Residential District ( up to 2units/acre ) . That land consists of Kingswood Estates , a subdivision of single -family residences , onthesouthsideof16 `h Street , and citrus groves on the north side of 16`h Street. The Main Canalbordersthesubjectpropertyonthenorth .
Subject Property 2
Subject Property 2 consists of a mix of wooded pasture, native uplands, wetlands , and ponds . NorthofSubjectProperty2isA- 1 zoned rangeland . West of the site , land is zoned A- 1 and contains a
pasture and non - commercial stable , and a garage workshop that is accessory to a single-familyresidence .The eastern portion of the Indian River Aerodrome , a subdivision of single - familyresidencesonlargelots , extends to the southwest corner of 5 `h Street, SW and 82nd Avenue . ThatsubdivisioniszonedAir- 1 , Airfield/Residential District.South and southeast of the site , landconsistsofcitrusgrovesandpasturelandandiszonedA - 1 .
On the south side of I " Street, SW is a ±40 acre tract bounded on the west by Subject Property 2 .That ±40 acre tract consists of six ±5-acre parcels and one ± 10- acre parcel . Those parcels are zonedA- 1 and are used primarily for residential purposes , although the ± 10-acre parcel also contains citrusgroves .
Subject Property 3
Subject Property 3 consists of two parcels . The northern 18 . 2 acre parcel contains a packinghouseandcitrusgroves . The southern 38 . 3 acres consists of citrus groves .
West of the site , land is zoned IG , General Industrial District, and contains several agriculturalbusinesses . Land located east of 74`h Avenue , in this portion of the county , is zoned A - 1 . Citrus
groves exist to the south of the site and to the east of the southern portion of the site . A mix of
pasture and wooded land exist to the south and east of the northern portion of the site .
Future Land Use Pattern
Subject Property 1
Subject Property 1 and land to the south and west are designated AG - 1 , Agricultural - 1 , on thecounty ' s future land use map . The AGA designation permits agricultural uses and residential useswithdensitiesupto1unit/5 acres . To the north of the subject property , across the Main Canal , landisdesignatedC/I , Commercial/Industrial . The C/I designation permits various commercial andindustrialzoningdistricts . To the east of the subject property , across 58 `h Avenue , land is designatedL - 1 , Low -Density Residential - 1 . The L - I designati
3 units/acre . on permits residential uses with densities up to
October 16 , 2001
120
U
f .
It 77
It
7M
b A ('
fie y 5
rn k.
3I Al 14"I4 19
91
11, 711 , i' I s'
Subject Property 2
Subject Property 2 and land to the north and east are designated AG- 1 . To the west of the site, across
82 "d Avenue, land is designated L- 1 . Land to the south of the site is designated C/I .
Subject Property 3
Subject Property 3 and properties to north , south, and east are designated AGA . Property to the west
of Subject Property 3 , across 74" Avenue , is designated C/I .
Environment
Although consisting mostly of citrus groves , the subject properties are likely to contain some upland
and wetland habitat . According to Flood Insurance Rating Maps , Subject Property 1 is within an
AE " 100 year floodplain , with a minimum base flood elevation requirement of 23 feet NGVD .
Subject Properties 2 and 3 are not within flood hazard areas .
Utilities and Services
Potable water distribution lines from the South County Reverse Osmosis Plant are in the right- of-
way , or are planned to soon be in the right- of- way , of 82nd Avenue , 58 " Avenue , and 74`d Avenue ,
adjacent to the subject properties . Wastewater collection lines from the West Regional Wastewater
Treatment Plant are in the right- of- way , or are planned to soon be in the right- of- way , of 82 "d
Avenue , 58 " Avenue , and 74 `h Avenue , adjacent to the subject properties .
Transportation System
Classified as an urban principal arterial road on the future roadway thoroughfare plan map , the
Portion of 58 " Avenue that is between the Main Canal and 12 " Street is a four lane paved road with
approximately 120 feet of existing public road right-of- way . A project to expand 58 `h Avenue to four
lanes between 12" Street and 9" Street , SW is scheduled to begin in December 2001 and to end in
2004 .
The segment of 74" Avenue between 9" Street, SW and 13" Street, SW is classified as a rural major
collector road on the future roadway thoroughfare plan map . This segment is a two lane paved road
with approximately 30 feet of existing public road right - of- way . Currently , there are no plans for
expansion of this portion of 74`h Avenue .
Classified as a rural principal arterial roadway on the future roadway thoroughfare plan map ,
82nd
Avenue , between 5 ` Street, SW and 16" Street, is a two-lane road with approximately 60 feet of
public road right-of- way . This portion of 82 "' Avenue is programmed for expansion to 136 feet of
public road right- of- way and four lanes by 2020 .
ANALYSIS
In this section , an analysis of the reasonableness of the land use amendment request will be
presented . Specifically , this analysis will address :
the request ' s impact on public facilities ;
the request ' s consistency with the county ' s comprehensive plan ;
the request ' s compatibility with the surrounding area ; and
the request ' s potential impact on environmental quality .
October 16 , 2001
121
IF fI
F
IF
Itt
v s rr ate vx ' r ; a tL1 uc.
e
Concurrency of Public Facilities
The subject properties are located outside of the county Urban Service Area ; therefore , they are not
currently suited for urban scale development .Regardless , the Comprehensive Plan establishes
minimum development standards for: Transportation , Potable Water, Wastewater, Solid Waste ,
Stormwater Management and Recreation (Future Land Use Policy 3 . 1 ) . The adequate provision of
these services is necessary to ensure the continued quality of life enjoyed by the community . The
Comprehensive Plan and Land Development Regulations (LDRs) require that new development be
reviewed to ensure that the minimum acceptable standards for these services and facilities are
maintained.
Policy 3 . 2 of the Future Land Use Element states that no development shall be approved unless it
is consistent with the concurrency management system component of the Capital Improvements
Element. For Comprehensive Plan amendment requests , conditional concurrency review is required .
Conditional concurrency review examines the available capacity of each facility with respect to a
proposed project . Since Comprehensive Plan amendment requests are not projects , county
regulations call for the concurrency review to be based upon the most intense use of the subject
property based upon the requested land use designation .For residential Comprehensive Plan
amendment requests , the most intense use ( according to the County ' s LDRs ) is the maximum
number of units that could be built on the site , given the size of the property and the maximum
density under the proposed land use designation . The site information used for the concurrency
analysis is as follows :
1 . Size of Area to be Redesignated : ±164 . 1 acres
2 . Existing Land Use Designation : AG- 1 , Agricultural - 1 ( up to 1 unit/5 acres)
3 . Proposed Land Use Designation : T , Transitional Residential (up to 1 unit/acre ; or up to 3
units/acre for Planned Development Projects )
4 . Most Intense Use of Subject Property
Under Current Land Use Designation :32 Single - Family Units
5 . Most Intense Use of Subject Property
Under Proposed Land Use Designation : 492 Single-Family Units
Transportation
As part of the concurrency review process , staff analyzes the number of peak hour/peak season/peak
direction trips that would be generated by the most intense use of the subject property under the
proposed land use designation , and assigns those trips to impacted roads . Impacted roads are defined
in section 910 . 09 (4)(b) 3 of the county ' s LDRs as roadway segments which receive five percent (5 % )
or more of the project traffic or fifty (50) or more project trips , whichever is less .
According to staff' s analysis , the existing level of service on impacted roadways would not be
lowered by the traffic generated by development of 492 single - family units on the subject properties .
Attachment 2 of this staff report contains a more detailed transportation concurrency analysis .
October 16 , 2001
122
q
e r G 3
S
1 IF IF
IF
11
IF
IF
I
Nater
With the proposed Comprehensive Plan amendment, the subject property could accommodate 492
single -family residential units , resulting in water consumption at a rate of 492 Equivalent Residential
Units (ERU) , or 123 , 000 gallons/day . This is based upon a level of service of 250 gallons/ERU/day .
Development on the subject property would be served by the South County Reverse Osmosis Plant ,
which currently has a remaining capacity of more than 4 , 500 , 000 gallons/day and can accommodate
the additional demand generated by the proposed Comprehensive Plan amendment.
Although plant capacity is sufficient, county utilities staff has indicated that the long- term capacity
of the distribution system ( i . e . , pumping capacity) could be impacted by the proposed amendment.
Staff will need to closely monitor and plan for growth in this area.
i
Wastewater
Based upon the most intense use allowed under the proposed Comprehensive Plan amendment,
development of the property will have a wastewater generation rate of approximately 492 Equivalent
Residential Units (ERU ) , or 123 , 000 gallons/day . This is based upon a level of service of 250
gallons/ERU/day . County wastewater service is available to the site from the West Regional
Wastewater Treatment Plant, which currently has a remaining capacity of over 1 , 000 , 000 gallons/day
and can accommodate the additional wastewater generated by the subject request .
Although plant capacity is sufficient , county utilities staff has indicated that the long- term capacity
of the collection system ( i . e . , pumping capacity) could be impacted by the proposed amendment .
Staff will need to closely monitor and plan for growth in this area .
Solid Waste
Solid waste service includes pick- up by private operators and disposal at the county landfill . The
county ' s adopted level of service standard for landfill capacity is 1 . 97 cubic yards/person/year. With
the county ' s average of approximately 2 . 3 persons/unit, a residential development of 492 units would
be anticipated to house approximately 1 , 132 people (2 . 3 X 492) . For the subject request to meet the
county ' s adopted level of service standard of 1 . 97 cubic yards/person/year , the landfill must have
enough capacity to accommodate approximately 2 , 230 ( 1 , 132 X 1 . 97) cubic yards/year.
A review of the solid waste capacity for the active segment of the county landfill indicates the
availability of more than 800 , 000 cubic yards . The active segment of the landfill has a threeyear
capacity , and the landfill has expansion capacity beyond 2010 . Based on the analysis , staff
determined that the county landfill can accommodate the additional solid waste generated by the site
under the proposed land use designation .
Stormwater Management
During the development approval process , all developments are reviewed for compliance with
county stormwater regulations which require on-site retention , preservation of floodplain storage and
minimum finished floor elevations . In addition , development proposals must meet the discharge
requirements of the county Stormwater Management Ordinance . Any development on the subject
property will be prohibited from discharging any runoff in excess of the pre - development rate . For
these reasons , drainage Level of Service will not be lowered by the proposed amendment .
Recreation
A review of county recreation facilities and the projected demand that would result from the most
intense development that could occur on the subject property under the proposed land use
October 16 , 2001
123
a
designation indicates that the adopted level of service would be maintained . The following table
illustrates the additional park demand associated with the proposed development of the property and
the existing surplus park acreage .
PARK INFORMATION
LOS ( Acres per 1 , 000 Population ) Project Demand (Acres ) Surplus Park Acreage
4 . 0 4 . 5264 11164
Concurrency Summary
Based on the analysis conducted , staff has determined that all concurrency-mandated facilities ,
including stormwater management, roads , solid waste , water, wastewater, and parks have adequate
capacity to accommodate the most intense use of the subject property under the proposed land use
designation .
Consistency with Comprehensive Plan
Comprehensive Plan amendment requests are reviewed for consistency with all policies of the
Comprehensive Plan . As per section 800 . 07 ( 1 ) of the County Code , the "Comprehensive Plan may
only be amended in such a way as to preserve the internal consistency of the plan pursuant to Section
163 . 3177 (2) , F. S . " Amendments must also show consistency with the overall designation of land
uses as depicted on the Future Land Use Map , which includes agricultural , residential , recreational ,
conservation , and commercial and industrial land uses and their densities .
The goals , objectives and policies are the most important parts, of the comprehensive plan . Policies
are statements in the plan that identify the actions which the county will take in order to direct the
community ' s development. As courses of action committed to by the county , policies provide the
basis for all county land development decisions --including plan amendment decisions . While all
comprehensive plan policies are important, some have more applicability than others in reviewing
plan amendment requests . Of particular applicability for this request is the following policy :
Future Land Use Element Policy 14 .3
The most important policy to consider in evaluating a plan amendment request for consistency with
the county ' s Comprehensive Plan is Future Land Use Element Policy 14 . 3 . This policy requires that
at least one of four criteria be met in order to approve a land use amendment request. These criteria
are :
the proposed amendment will correct a mistake in the approved plan ;
the proposed amendment will correct an oversight in the approved plan ;
the proposed amendment involves a swap or reconfiguration of land uses at separate sites ,
and that swap or reconfiguration will not increase the overall land use density or intensity
depicted on the Future Land Use Map ; or
the proposed amendment is warranted based on a substantial change in circumstances
affecting the subject property .
In this instance , the proposed amendment meets Future Land Use Element Policy 14. 3 's second
criterion . That criterion states that the proposed amendment will correct an oversight in the
approved plan . In this case , the oversight was that certain lands were excluded from the urban
service area and given an agricultural land use designation despite the fact that certain characteristics
October 16 , 2001
124
k
r
i
of those lands indicated that they should have been included in the urban service area and given anurbanlandusedesignation .
The Board of County Commissioners has determined that land that meets the following criteria
should have been included in the urban service area and given an urban designation :
the property abuts an arterial road that contains county water and sewer lines within the
road ' s right -of- way ;
the property abuts commercial/industrial designated property ; and
0 the property is at Least 20 acres in size .
An oversight occurred when land that meets the above criteria was designated agricultural andexcludedfromtheurbanservicearea . The proposed amendment corrects that oversight by
expanding the urban service area to include land that meets the above criteria, and by redesignatingthatlandtoanurbandesignation . For that reason , the proposed amendment meets Future Land Use
Element Policy 14 . 3 's second criterion and is consistent with Future Land Use Element Policy 14 . 3 .
Summary of Consistency with the Comprehensive Plan
While the referenced policy is particularly applicable to this request, other comprehensive plan
policies and objectives also have relevance . For that reason, staff evaluated the proposed amendment
for consistency with all applicable plan policies and objectives . Based upon that analysis , staffdeterminedthattheamendmentisconsistentwiththeComprehensivePlan .
Compatibility with the Surrounding Area
Residential development of the subject properties under the T land use designation could be
compatible with surrounding areas . The T designation contains several provisions that somewhat
lessen agricultural/urban incompatibilities . Those provisions include the following :
The PD process is encouraged . The PD process allows the Board of County Commisioners
more oversight and flexibility with respect to site design issues and development approvals .
Site design issues that may be addressed through the PD process include setbacks , buffers ,
landscaping , berms , walls , and placement of buildings and stormwater management areas .
Caribbean Fruit Fly host plants will be prohibited on T designated land .
Buyers of platted lots in residential projects on T designated land must be notified of theFloridaRighttoFarmAct , and that active agricultural operations occur nearby .
With these provisions is place , the proposed amendment is not anticipated to increaseincompatibilities .
Potential Impact on Environmental Quality
As indicated in the Existing Land Use Pattern section of this report, most of the subject properties 'land has been altered for residential or agricultural development .Therefore , few natural areas
remain within the bounds of the subject properties . For that reason , the proposed change will nothaveasignificanteffectonenvironmentalquality .
October 16 , 2001
125
t
With respect to the natural areas within the subject properties ' limits , it should be noted that any
residential development will need to comply with the county ' s land development regulations ,
including its environmental protection regulations . Various environmental permits , including land
clearing and tree removal permits , must be obtained prior to development. In addition , the county ' s
native upland plant community set- aside requirement will apply to properties at least five acres in
size .
For those reasons , the proposed amendment will not result in an increase in potential adverse
environmental impacts on the subject properties .
CONCLUSION
The proposed land use designation amendment is compatible with the surrounding areas , consistent
with the goals , objectives , and policies of the Comprehensive Plan , and meets all concurrency
standards . The request meets all applicable criteria .
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners review the information and determine
whether or not to approve the proposed amendment. If the Board chooses to approve the proposed
amendment, the Board should adopt the attached ordinance .
ATTACHMENTS
1 . Comprehensive Plan Land Use Designation Amendment Application
2 . Detailed Transportation Concurrency Analysis
3 . Approved Minutes of the April 5 , 2001 , Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting
4 . Approved Minutes of the May 17 , 2001 , Professional Services Advisory Committee Meeting
5 . Approved Minutes of the June 5 , 2001 , Board of County Commissioners Meeting
6 . DCA ' s ORC Report
7 . Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Designation Amendment Ordinance
The Chairman opened the public hearing and asked if anyone wished to be heard in
this matter .There being none , she closed the public hearing .
MOTION WAS MADE by Commissioner Adams ,
SECONDED BY Vice Chairman Stanbridge , to adopt the
Ordinance as amended . Reduced from 164 . 1 acres to 30 . 8
acres )
October 16 , 2001
126
e
WWI
County Attorney Bangel pointed out this ordinance cannot have an effective date
earlier that the ordinance adopted on the previous item ( 9 . A . 5 . , Ordinance No . 2001 - 029) .
Both Commissioner Adams and Vice Chairman Stanbridge agreed to incorporate that
stipulation in their motion .
THE CHAIRMAN CALLED THE QUESTION and the motion
carried 4 - 0 ( Commissioner Macht absent . ) (Adopted Ordinance
No . 2001 - 030 amending the Future Land Use Element by
expanding the Urban Service Area to include , and changing the
Land Use Designation for 30 . 8 acres located at the southwest
corner of 58 "Avenue and the Main Canal from AG - 1 ,
Agricultural - 1 up to I unit/5 acres ] to T, Transitional
Residential (up to 1 unit/acre ; or up to 3 units/acre for Planned
Development projects) ; andproviding codification , severability ,
and effective date . )
ORDINANCE NO . 2001 - 030
AN ORDINANCE OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY , FLORIDA , AMENDING THE FUTURE LAND
USE ELEMENT BY EXPANDING THE URBAN SERVICE AREA TO INCLUDE , AND
CHANGING THE LAND USE DESIGNATION FOR 30 . 8 ACRES LOCATED AT THE
SOUTHWEST CORNER OF 58TH AVENUE AND THE MAIN CANAL FROM AG - 1 ,
AGRICULTURAL- 1 (UP TO I UNIT/5 ACRES ) , TO T , TRANSITIONAL RESIDENTIAL ( UP
TO 1 UNIT/ACRE ; OR UP TO 3 UNITS/ACRE FOR PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS ) ;
AND PROVIDING CODIFICATION , SEVERABILITY , AND EFFECTIVE DATE .
WHEREAS ,the Board of County Commissioners adopted the Indian River County
Comprehensive Plan on February 13 , 1990, and
WHEREAS , the county received comprehensive plan amendment applications during its January
2001 amendment submittal window , and
WHEREAS , the Local Planning Agency held a public hearing on this comprehensive plan
amendment request on April 5 , 2000 , after due public notice , and
October 16 , 2001
127
ORDINANCE NO . 2001 - 030
WHEREAS , the Local Planning Agency made a recommendation regarding this comprehensive
plan amendment to the Board of County Commissioners , and
WHEREAS , the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County held a Transmittal
Public Hearing on June 5 , 2001 , after advertising pursuant to F. S . 163 . 3184( 15 ) (b) l and (c ) , and
WHEREAS , the Board of County Commissioners approved the transmittal of this comprehensive
plan amendment to the Florida Department of Community Affairs for their review and comment, and
WHEREAS , the Board of County Conumssioners announced at the transmittal public hearing its
intention to hold and advertise a final public hearing at the adoption stage of this plan amendment,
and
WHEREAS , the Florida Department of Community Affairs received this Comprehensive Plan
Amendment on June 11 , 2001 , for the State review pursuant to F. S . 163 . 3184(4) , and
WHEREAS , Indian River County received the Objections , Recommendations , and Comments
ORC) Report from the Florida Department of Community Affairs on August 20, 2001 , and
WHEREAS , the ORC Report contained no objections or comments regarding this Comprehensive
Plan Amendment, and
WHEREAS , the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County held a Comprehensive
Plan Amendment Adoption Public Hearing on October 16 , 2001 , after advertising pursuant to
Chapter 163 . 3184 ( 15 ) (b) 2 and (c) , FS and Chapter 125 . 66 (4) , FS ;
NOW, THEREFORE , BE IT ORDAINED , by the Board of County Commissioners of Indian
River County , Florida, that:
SECTION 1 . Comprehensive Plan Amendment Adoption and Transmittal
The amendment to the Indian River County Comprehensive Plan identified in Section 2 is herebyadopted , and three (3 ) copies are directed to be transmitted to the State of Florida Department ofCommunityAffairsandone ( 1 ) copy is directed to be transmitted to the Treasure Coast RegionalPlanningCouncil .
SECTION 2 . Amendments to the Comprehensive Plan
With respect to the following described property situated in Indian River County , Florida to wit:
October 16 , 2001
128
eft r I
i
ORDINANCE NO . 2001 - 030
THE FOLLOWING PARCELS OF LAND , SITUATE IN PORTIONS OF SECTIONS 5 AND8 , TOWNSHIP 33 SOUTH , RANGE 39 EAST, INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA , BEINGMOREPARTICULARLYDESCRIBEDASFOLLOWS :
PARCEL A : BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE SOUTHEASTQUARTEROFTHESOUTHEASTQUARTEROFSAIDSECTION5 , TOWNSHIP 33SOUTH , RANGE 39 EAST ; THEN NORTH TO THE SOUTH RIGHT- OF- WAY LINE OFTHEMAINCANALOFTHEINDIANRIVERFARMSCOMPANY ; THEN EASTERLYALONGTHESAIDCANALRIGHT- OF- WAY LINE TO THE WEST RIGHT- OF- WAYLINEOFCANALOFTHESAIDINDIANRIVERFARMSCOMPANY, KNOWN ANDPLATTEDASLATERAL "B " ; THEN SOUTH ALONG THE RIGHT- OF- WAY OF THESAIDLATERAL ` B " TO THE SECTION LINE DIVIDING SECTIONS 5 AND 8 ; THENWESTTOTHEPOINTOFBEGINNING ;
LESS AND EXCEPT : THE WEST 56 FEET OF THE EAST 136 FEET OF THE
SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 5 , TOWNSHIP 33 SOUTH, RANGE 39 EAST
LYING SOUTH OF THE MAIN CANAL, ACCORDING TO THE LAST GENERAL
PLAT OF THE LANDS OF THE INDIAN RIVER FARMS COMPANY RECORDED IN
PLAT BOOK 2 , PAGE 25 , OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF ST . LUCIE COUNTY,
FLORIDA, FURTHER DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS :
COMMENCE AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SECTION 5 AND RUN ALONG
THE SECTION LINE NORTH 89 DEGREES , 57 MINUTES 17 SECONDS WEST A
DISTANCE OF 56 FEET TO A POINT . THEN RUN NORTH 0 DEGREES 17
MINUTES 45 SECONDS EAST A DISTANCE OF 674 . 01 FEET TO A POINT IN
THE SOUTH RIGHT- OF-WAY LINT OF THE MAIN CANAL. THEN RUN ALONG
THE SOUTH RIGHT- OF- WAY OF THE CANAL , NORTH 69 DEGREES 36
MINUTES 11 SECONDS EAST, A DISTANCE OF 59 . 86 FEET TO A POINT LYING
80 FEET WEST OF AND NORMAL TO THE EAST LINE OF SECTION 5 . THEN
RUN SOUTH 0 DEGREES 17 MINUTES 45 SECONDS WEST A DISTANCE OF
694 . 92 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING .
PARCEL B :THE NORTH HALF OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE
NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 8 , TOWNSHIP 33 SOUTH , RANGE 39EAST.
LESS AND EXCEPT : THE WEST 56 FEET OF THE EAST 136 FEET OF THE
NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 8 ,
TOWNSHIP 33 SOUTH, RANGE 39 EAST, ACCORDING TO THE LAST GENERAL
PLAT OF THE LANDS OF THE INDIAN RIVER FARMS COMPANY RECORDED IN
PLAT BOOK 2 , PAGE 25 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF ST . LUCIE COUNTY ,
FLORIDA , FURTHER DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS :
COMMENCE AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SECTION 8 AND RUN ALONG
THE SECTION LINE NORTH 89 DEGREES 57 MINUTES 17 SECONDS WEST A
DISTANCE OF 80 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING . THEN CONTINUE
NORTH 89 DEGREES 57 MINUTES 17 SECONDS WEST A DISTANCE OF 56
FEET TO A POINT . THEN RUN SOUTH 0 DEGREES 29 MINUTES 24 SECONDSWESTADISTANCEOF676 . 58 FEET TO A POINT . THEN RUN SOUTH 89
DEGREES 57 MINUTES 16 SECONDS EAST A DISTANCE OF 56 FEET TO A
POINT . THEN RUN NORTH 0 DEGREES 29 MINUTES 24 SECONDS EAST A
DISTANCE OF 676 . 58 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING .
October 16 , 2001
129
L J J C,
ORDINANCE NO. 2001 - 030
1 . The Urban Service Area is expanded to include the above described property ;
2 . The land use designation of the above described property is changed from AG- 1 , Agricultural- 1
up to 1 unit/5 acres ) , to T, Transitional Residential (up to 1 unit/acre ; or up to 3 units/acre forPlannedDevelopmentProjects ) ; and
3 . The Future Land Use Map is hereby revised accordingly.
SECTION 3 . Repeal of Conflicting Provisions
All previous ordinances , resolutions , or motions of the Board of County Commissioners of Indian
River County , Florida which conflict with the provisions of this ordinance are hereby repealed to the
extent of such conflict .
SECTION 4 . Severability
It is declared to be the intent of the Board of County Commissioners that if any provision of this
ordinance and therefore, the Indian River County Comprehensive Plan Amendment is for any reason
finally held invalid or unconstitutional by any court of competent jurisdiction, such provision shall
be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision and such holding shall not affect the
validity of the remaining provisions .
SECTION 5 . Effective Date
The effective date of this ordinance, and therefore, this plan amendment, shall be the date a final
order is issued by the Department of Community Affairs or Administration Commission finding theamendmentincompliancewithSection163 . 3184( 1 ) (b) , Florida Statutes , whichever occurs earlier.
No development orders , development permits , or land uses dependent on this amendment may be
issued or commence before it has become effective . If a final order of noncompliance is issued bytheAdministrationCommission , this amendment may nevertheless be made effective by adoption
at a public meeting after public notice of a resolution affirming its effective status , a copy of which
resolution shall be sent to the Florida Department of Community Affairs , Division of Resource
Planning and Management, Plan Processing Team.
This ordinance was advertised in the Press -Journal on the 3d
day of October, 2001 , for a publichearingtobeheldonthe16th
day of October, 2001 , at which time it was moved for adoption byCommissionerAdamssecondedbyCommissionerStanbridgeandadoptedbythefollowingvote :
Chairman Caroline D . Ginn Aye
Vice- Chairman Ruth M. Stanbridge Aye
Commissioner Fran B . Adams Ave
Commissioner Kenneth R . Macht Absent.
Commissioner John W . Tippin Aye
October 16 , 2001
130
0
z
ORDINANCE NO . 2 ( 1 - 030
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
BY :
Caroline D . Ginn , Chai an
ATTEST BSC
OQ
Zd7 Jeffrey K . Barton , Clerk
Acknowledgment by the Department of State of the State of Florida this Q day of 0Q 2001 .
Acknowledgment from the Department of State received on this day of 2001 ,2001 , at
A .M ./P FA . and filed in the office of the Clerk of the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River
County , Florida .
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGAL SUFFICIENCY
William G . Collins II, Deputy County Attorney
APPROVED AS TO PLANNING MATTERS
Robert M . Keating , AICP ; Co nity Develop ent Director
Indian River Co. Approved Date
Admin .
Legal L E l
Budget 0
Dept.
Risk Mer.
cd\u\jw\lu\ci trans l \luda ord . wpd
October 16 , 2001
131
TUU
9 . B . 1 . PUBLIC DISCUSSION ITEM - REQUEST BY MR AND MRS
ANTHONY ESPOSITO TO SPEAK REGARDING " LIFE AND SAFETYISSUES /PRIVACY GATE - RIVERPOINT91
The Board reviewed the information provided in the backup .
Tony Esposito , 624 23 d
Street SE , presented on the overhead various documents (a
copy of which can be found with the backup in the Office of the Clerk to the Board) .His
issue concerned the gate installed next to his property at the entrance to Riverpoint . He
stated the opening of the gate does not allow for proper ingress/egress by oversize vehicles ,
including large trucks , school busses , and fire equipment .He asserted that the gate was
improperly placed , swings onto his property, does not meet County traffic engineering
requirements , and blocks a fire hydrant .
Dora Esposito , 624 23 `d
Street SE , pointed out that garbage trucks and other large
vehicles create traffic hazards and use the Esposito ' s driveway for a turnaround . She had
heard conflicting stories as to whether the gate was in the original plans or not . She believed
this gate has caused a fire hazard for three years , yet her home was cited by the County .
Director Keating advised that the County changed gate regulations because of what
occurred in this unique situation . He displayed a map on the overhead and explained the
evolution of this problem and described how this gate was situated . If a request for this type
of gate were to come in today, it would not be approved . The plan is for Riverpoint to move
the gate and add fire hydrants .Other proposals are now in for administrative approval . A
different type of gate has been suggested by staff, but Riverpoint ' s representative has not
been receptive due to cost.
Environmental & Code Enforcement Chief Roland DeBlois pointed out that due to
an oversight Mr .Esposito ' s fence is located on the road right- of-way .The Code
Enforcement Board said it could stay unless the County takes the initiative to remove it .
Mrs . Esposito claimed that authorities were made aware of this lack of turnaround
October 16 , 2001
132
i6 1 i F, G 9 0 1
re
S
MR
space early in the process .
Chairman Ginn was concerned how this occurred and thought that a compromiseYY3F4
could be reached .
Public Works Director James Davis explained how the problem occurred from the
Y {s engineering perspective and believed there could have been some misunderstanding . He
agreed the gate is narrow , not in a good location , and does not have a good opening
Y mechanism . He advised that a staff member, a CAD technician , had done some of the
drafting for this project on his own time but that a fire hydrant was not shown on the original
Fdrawing . He added that there was no impropriety on the part of the employee . This
entranceway is uniquely situated and it is a problem , but it is not uncommon for garbage
trucks to back into driveways to turn around .He hoped it could be worked out .
Fire Prevention Bureau Chief Dan Dietz , having sworn to tell the truth , stated that the
Fire Department had two issues with this subdivision : 1 ) an insufficient turning radius for t F
their trucks to make the immediate left-hand turn just inside the gate to serve that street , and
2 ) the opening of the exit gate blocks an existing fire hydrant . He has met with Riverpoint ' s
Board and given thein the turning radius specifications and the code requiring hydrants to
be unobstructed . He was given assurance that they would respond on this matter . It appears
that Mr . Keating ' s proposed plan would meet the required turning radius . A new fire
hydrant has been offered and an offer to relocate the one behind the gate which serves Vero
Shores and all the homes outside the gate . It appears that if those plans are implemented ,
the two original problems with the gate would be solved .
Mr . Esposito believed his property has been depreciated because of this gate .
Commissioner Adams thought Mr . Esposito may have a legitimate reason to contact
PtheProperty AppraisereAraiser about the value of his property . She also suggested several possible
solutions and pointed out that Mr . Esposito ' s ultimate course might be a civil suit .
Discussion ensued .
It
fi
k
October 16 , 2001
133
E ) u U
T
r
t If'5,
1182
RSV
UNw=- I e
IfI
Chairman Ginn asked that staff work on this to try to reach an amiable solution .
s More suggestions were offered by the Commissioners .
Director Keating thought the cost issue to be the problem on the part of Riverpoint .
x
If Deputy County Attorney Collins advised that the real issue from the legal point- of-
view is the life - safety issue . He had met with Mr . and Mrs . Esposito as to the location of the
gate .Mr . Esposito is frustrated and wants to keep people out of his driveway . Riverpoint ' s
s
gate is on the right- of-way and was permitted .It may be possible to give Mr . Esposito a
k
special permit to put in a gate or extend his fence on the right- of-way ; or perhaps the County
Ile, I can allow him to chain his driveway or somehow preclude people from using it . With regard
F,
Y,to a suggestion that the County explore a cul - de- sac in that 70 ' right- of-way, the Espositos
and their neighbor, Mrs . Huber, might feel that is their " front yard " even though it is a
grassed right- of-way .He did not know if 70 ' is enough ; the traffic engineers will have to
study that . He realized it is very rare to grant a license to have something in a public right-
of-way .There was only one time he could remember when a well was allowed to remain
on right- of- way property . Perhaps because this is a unique situation , a permit or license
could be granted to occupy public right- of-way subject to a covenant that the installation be
removed if necessary .He thought it would be worth staff exploring .
Chairman Ginn asked staff to come up with some problem - solving ideas .
Linda Huber, 653 23 d
Street SE , 32962 , spoke ofthe project ' s beginnings when she
asked about the orange markings on her property . She was advised that would be a
turnaround .From that day she documented what she called "the runaround " . She finally
got Commissioner Tippin to come out with Director Davis to meet with the neighbors .ThatY .
resulted in her not having a turnaround on her property and a sign was put at
61 Avenue SE
saying there was no turnaround, which is not effective . She also spoke about the gate not t ;
working , speeding cars , and thanked the Board for their time .
If
If
October 16 , 2001
If
134
If0
f
NAN
J .. fi
d a,
atm '
r
5 M
t y, r t . . .
a'
5
y tY/ T £' C 3 2
Y Sv v 1
4
i d' 6 f 'n 3 :1AP 4 ^1
hof
x
s
IV
W
Director Davis stated that he had met with Ms . Huber at the site . There was never a s
z
turnaround proposed on her property ; it was always within the 70 ' right- of- way on theplat r
of Vero Shores Subdivision . This is a very confined area . The County could not get
agreement from either Ms . Huber or Mr . Esposito for a turnaround solution . He then
addressed questions on a keypad permit being in the private right - of- way . There was a
problem with vehicles hitting it, so staff recommended a small curb which makes for a littleS
encroachment into the public right- of- way .
Environmental & Code Enforcement Chief Roland DeBlois responded to a specific
question about the location of the key pad right at the edge of the interface between the
public and private right - of-way . The curbing is the sole part that technically encroaches into
b , the public right- of- way .
A discussion about the key pad ensued .
i ,
Commissioner Adams asked if Mr . Esposito and Ms . Huber would be amenable to
a turnaround there and Mr . Esposito and Ms . Huber both appeared to be agreeable with that
suggestion .
a : - Chairman Ginn requested that staff give her an update on this every other week .
Dan Zicker, 2020 5 " Avenue SE , spoke as a Vero Shores resident and a Riverpoint
property owner who was only interested in fishing . He found this bickering sickening and
hoped the problem would soon be solved . He failed to see why everyone could not get
along .
Mel PUBLIC DISCUSSION ITEM — REQUEST OF JILL GEISZTOSPEAKREGARDING " GATE /WABASSO BEACH "I It
Jill Geisz, 113 Filbert Street, questioned the need for the new gate at Wabasso Beach .
She had spoken with Public Works Director James Davis who told her the gate had been
installed due to vandalism , because of the shark fishing, and that it would take an "Act of
October 16, 2001
135
11
r
1
j ;
Fd r`ti
e2 ... A: i AN*`;f r. . ,3ifa ° "
4`
rSi ^ kE .fie., s'*.a ..,
rra A`,E6..
P'
s aW., .. s. 4 . R"""'.:"..
e
y z
Congress " to remove it . She felt the real reason was because of the recent reports that shark
bites in that area were being linked to information that some people were chumming for
t sharks . She checked with the Sheriff' s office and there have been very few reports of
vandalism either before or after the gate ' s installation . Local ichthyologist Grant Gilmore
eo advised her there are always sharks in the area regardless of the chumming ; chumming for
sharks at night will not increase the daytime numbers . She requested the gate be taken down
P .
andparking provided so locals and tourists will have access to the beach as it is the only
beach in the north end of the county .
Public Works Director James Davis stated he did not recall saying anything about an
s t ,Act of Congress " . He cited several reasons why the gate was installed .He pointed out
there is no lighting , that lighting causes confusion to nesting sea turtles ,and this beach is
e
y :'in an aggressive erosion zone which has caused escarpments by the steps which are not
visible at night without lighting .Parking is also a problem .If the Board wished the gates
e
removed , he would remove them .
ell Commissioner Adams understood there have been reports of partying and feelings
of intimidation after dark in the late hours . People who use the beach responsibly
unfortunately have to suffer along with the others .
Vice Chairman Stanbridge and Commissioner Adams both raised the liability
issueell
and Ms . Geisz countered that people must respect the fact that sharks are in our waters .
z
Steve Parsons , 6895 73 `d
Street and owner of Wabasso Tackle , supported Ms . Geisz '
position adding that he fishes at Wabasso Beach at daybreak and after dark .The Sheriff' s
deputies and Indian River Shores public service vehicles have used that area for a
turnaround which has heightened security . He believed local kids with poor supervision
are creating the problems . As to the liability, he felt those who now park on AIA can still
walk around the barrier .He suggested parking spots be allowed on A 1 A and some of the
no parking " signs should be removed . He believed the public should have access to Vero
October 16 , 2001
66
136
nSitI `' G U
a,
u,'aM;
S .
fir s n " S t k'° Gn at" ,
F ad`s"; } ,
s k
x R"'w',^'y`. , r(k
Yf+ r,•
V ct{
4 yi 5.<y z.., x p 'ii'.. r;,. ^``
r 3, ..;
t *
v,F ItIN
e is:
tr ,4 'Ff ryYmdX .x 3,i{. dJ;w.3*<•?%+vX`.
Syn
r
Beach ' s beaches .
Chairman Ginn asked if the gate could stay open until 10 pm, and Administrator
Chandler recommended that all beaches be treated the same with the same hours .
Director Davis spoke of lighting requirements which must be in place for safety at
other sites open at night . Risk Management gave encouragement for installation of these
gates .
Vice Chairman Stanbridge pointed out that our area is growing so fast that it is
necessary to watch everything we do , but times change .
J'rBillGlynn , 1802 Barefoot Place, Summerplace , described a shark event at the beach
he had witnessed one night about 11 : 30 pm . He saw that an 8 foot black tip shark was
caught, photos were taken , and the shark was returned to the water . He learned that the
people were from Brevard County and they come to fish 2 - 3 times a month .He told how 1 6111 1, 16
they fished with heavy rods , prepare their bait , and throw it into the water . That bait may or
may not attract shark , but the perception is that it could and he warned that if someone is
attacked the County might be wide open to a lawsuit .He wanted Wabasso Beach gated at
night just like the other County beaches are .
No action taken .
Mel PUBLIC DISCUSSION ITEM REQUEST OF MR JIM
SINCLAIR TO SPEAK REGARDING NOISE AT ST . EDWARDS
UPPER SCHOOL AND LACK OF RESPONSE FROM COUNTY CODE
ENFORCEMENT "
Jim Sinclair , 2074 Oceanridge , related a chronology of his meetings , phone calls ,
and other attempts to get a reduction in the sound level of the air- conditioning system
installed at the St . Edwards Upper School new auditorium . He has spoken not only with St .
Edwards ' representatives , but also with County staff in his efforts to get this problem
October 16 , 2001
137
p PG 9 0 6
r :
s ,
1 a ,µ'ms * tr ng-
a c ,# t F F '"+ .L`' '.=k. , ',x.
i7" •'
t
r s
l`N.rat4p AIR
gyp
I f a} x # , ' 3°sb ', s rt h t qr, k a -tr t` ,a.:t
r
i” x...aM rra:r . ,,,,, err .. zr,,..,e'a. .- 'a t e"2 + ... .
x Z
x
66
addressed . Some actions have been taken , he has received promises of additional action , but
to date the sound level is still an irritating , constant, dull drone . Decibel readings have been
taken and the St . Edwards ' representatives have talked about commissioning a sound study
for recommendations to reduce the sound further ; he understood the parties were meeting
later today . He hoped some kind of an agreement could be reached to give him some relief
from this constant irritant ; it is time for a solution so he can have his rightful quiet enjoyment
of his property .
Community Development Director Robert Keating advised that he has met with the
St . Edwards ' representatives and they are committed to working on a solution . They have
tried turning the equipment off at night , put a wall up to try to reduce the noise and have
sprayed some sound- deadening material . He explained decibel noise readings and that a
reading had been taken by staff. Another resident has been taking decibel readings also and
has learned the sound increases when there is a southwest wind . The St . Edwards '
representatives have received the result of a sound study they commissioned which
confirmed the County ' s testing and also gives recommendations for reducing the noise levels
even more . He understood there was another meeting later today with the interested parties
to discuss the results and suggestions in the report . The prospect is that the situation will be
helped . He felt that no action could be taken on Mr . Sinclair ' s request given the current
codes and specific decibel criteria which applies to this type of noise . He hoped an
agreement could be reached from their meeting .
Although the noise might be within the decibel limits , Mr . Sinclair invited anyone to
come to his home at 9 : 30 or 10 pm or at 6 : 05 am on a Sunday morning and witness the
constant irritant noise .It has been 18 months and he felt it was time to solve this .
Dan Ritchey , 2625 E . 63 `d Street, advised he is on the Board at St . Edwards . He
understood the frustration level butpointed out there are two sides . St . Edwards understands
its place in the area and strives to be good neighbors . For this reason , the building site was
October 16 , 2001
138
PG 007
aF
t :4 .
n ' 'Yi;, A i G"s tP{ as,-.r y. S w'9x
ate+ "y':•.4 y ,
4
f St YS
r , . t ' 'i'P . '%
sS P 7'd;".'.d r ;r+y f °ik"'"' c , . .ti "nsk'
u* . :x Fy 'r"i4 f, T `r
v.
y,
a..k3¢4s"rsst ,a. } s'r. x.v'' "
t
r r = byi t>L x±, iti' `".a , ZS;, 3a,, x z ,A` id, s"o-.. "°"'4,a ter a g¢ 5 :..y qd
ysn- _
k t
4"
F3 a i{,r'' . i,
rzF#+SAy' "veq.,:. adp* '"
k t• s' ' .'5 >
s'ar X 4!4' .y_ i ae i
F Sv
ra:
y f,:;
t
v
relocated closer to AIA and other pre - construction requests of the County were met as well .
He understood that the building is within Code and they have spent an additional $ 60 , 000
to try to do the right thing and reduce the decibel levels .He realized a constant noise can
be quite annoying .They are going meet at 4 pm and are going to strive to see what can be
ILI -
r
done .
Chairman Ginn understood that York is no longer making the particular model of air-
conditioner because it is so noisy .
Mr . Ritchey pointed out that turning off the unit at night could lead to a " sick
building " and reduction of the useable life of the unit .
No action taken .
9 . 8 . 4 . PUBLIC DISCUSSION ITEM REQUEST OF GEORGE
RACICOT TO SPEAK REGARDING UNSAFE ELECTRICAL
SERVICES - LAKEWOOD PARK "
George Racicot, 1544 90 `h Avenue , Lot 310 , Lakewood Village , advised he has
f
made complaints to Code Enforcement regarding face -plates not being on electrical boxes ,
which he felt is dangerous . He declared that the inspectors were not really looking at all the
boxes , but instead just looking at the one in each complaint .
Community Development Director Robert Keating stated that Code Enforcement
Officers do an inspection any time there is a complaint . For Mr . Racicot ' s complaints , an
electrical inspector was sent .
Building Division Director Wayne Russ explained that over the years Mr . Racicot has
pointed out many concerns at this and other mobile home parks . Mr . Russ emphasized that
his department never ignores a complaint and that inspections are scheduled on a life - safety
basis . While there may have been occasions when specific locations for inspection or r
terminology have been a problem , staff has been cooperative and accommodated Mr .
October 16 , 2001
139
fgp K:d b AS q
p ka.._ RSP." 'Fi n ',p„ w`' 3v . inn .., R av 3 i ,2" "°g .`•'e SSU d
F. spFL'Y a,
F y%,,.*•.
s h' , Yk, i$zw 'q: {
1 o' '.` ;TSF• L r , *... y '. a kv . .4X 3' '#v ., " +" . . '.,e`' e:£:
a
N h sr'k
o-' N , s'r,°
a si' w+
ss.,.
r;.. x, ;??x- ' y'".ry , - xMi"+. -•f , t' A. ra.+
xta'.`. d,: .`^s. r „b t"15 , '-.:Pt t .+ .. w' ya`# r`Sa r+ 'v ' • .,• ` r+£
s° a . :^. ,., u," : n
y
r;+ r J' t 4'1. .s err=v ` a "' ny,,, s sr ++„ u , . s'sv xyn's.,t .` '" i a C}. .^ e .. . hk' a z„:
Racicot ' s concerns . He gave assurances that all complaints are taken very seriously and
inspections are made in every instance they are reported to his department .
After a lengthy discussion which indicated that staff had performed their specified
duties , Mr . Racicot advised that he had come to the Commission first before going to court .
No action taken ., _
9 . Be5 . PUBLIC DISCUSSION ITEM — REQUEST OF BRIAN HEADY
TO SPEAK REGARDING " NON— RESPONSIVE GOVERNMENT AND
ACTUAL COST TO COUNTY TAXPAYERS ”
The Board reviewed a letter of October 9 , 2001 :
Brian T. Heady
406 19" Street
Vero Beach, Fl 32960
C\ fC1200 ,
October 9 , 2001 0
P ti
Caroline Ginn
1 9 SZbZ Z `
Margaret Gunter
Indian River County Conmiission
Vero Beach Florida 32960
Dear County Commission Commissioners :
Please place me on the citizen input public discussion portion of your agenda for
the next meeting in October . My discussion will be about " non-responsive government"
and actual cost to county taxpayers . Thank you for this opportunity to present to you this
timely informative infonxiati.on . if you have any questions I can be reached by telephone
at 778 - 1028 .
Since y ,
i Brian T . Heady
October 16 , 2001
140
ra
G 1 9
2'na
P a
d ti
r
4qF r- w ' y c . a 7= , ;.., - tia t. s a U'= a. . K . ':',ri f "`. _. . . ,3._._ s t•.. m.”
i p ;u;+,, . F '
sem`._• . s tt kg r t"x . . F`L = i a .
r r'
uv.``•',
x , S,X'
a ,%$i'r e," .
s . .,
S'
fi`i
4,a . f.'cg a4 a '
1`,a y,'&z.".
ry. . : -"Sa"','r4 .fk4< "'":,.. x
a u
u
4
Brian Heady criticized the lack of response to his questions and hypothesized that
no response raises a red flag . He declared that the Board has granted concessions to out
of county developers to provide jobs for local people, which resulted in existing businesses
closing and the loss of jobs . Also out- of- county developers of affordable housing came
wanting more concessions . More low-paying j obs are not needed here , we need living- wage
jobs .Before offering any concessions to a developer, he wanted to know how many jobs
would be available for local people and at what wages . He felt the Board ' s lack of response
will cost the County more tax dollars . Now another developer is coming in asking for
Off
concessions with a promise to provide employment . When asked to be more specific , Mr .
Heady advised he was referring to the 20 jobs promised by Calpine . He also wanted to
know whether the jobs will be for current residents and what the salaries will be . He
stressed they should not be given concessions unless they promise jobs for local people .
Chairman Ginn did not know whether local people would have the ability to fill the
positions offered by Calpine , but Mr . Heady stressed that the Board does not know whether
or not there will be any jobs provided to local people nor what the salaries will be .
No action taken .
9 . C .1 e -3 . PUBLIC NOTICE ITEMS FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS
SCHEDULED ON OCTOBER 23 , 2001
1. LDR AMENDMENT ORDINANCES
a. To update the aftidavit o exemption regulations to
cfell,
conform with recently approved comprehensive plan policies that
allow use of the affidavit of exemption process, as well as the
subdivision Matting process, in agriculturally designated areas
October 16 , 2001
141
t F0910
a, . x . .
5 . _
w
S. >. rwu 'tam', r ` "'`' ,'."y m ;^x s< >? w s « t -# , wt
a'
k,
t s ..
W, r,,ems *
s f."'d'4 y ff ':°^ 3" 3,"i .
t's . r x 4 ^;xa.
i
ttc .
W _ x a s y x. ..# ,*fes_ z q a"i2, fi,^,aEk' we F.tnr A:" dcy ' :s ya"'"'°R a 3 :u1'' 4. '
r' -x w r. k-' :3" k` .xq
v'u4 3,;s,£a , y,, v h . x ,r s; a r;. '. r xF' roE Sxy y chat k•
r. a.MG _ s, a . ea,`fxM ws""'fL, ».fe5..,3;. .= v3',Eo- f.. wh 4ffY"i.''vt`r, n^.efi...sr_a.:rv1•„t,Y: "'' bY.?Ys'"3s`"',`'2p't tiG zA:,`.,.',i: w x # t' '. ,c e ., gin a's`
a,
3'S.sf'?"f.a.`'w n:..v. .,,,..:
a.: .. v. . i n t W r "yd 4 , , v ":1..Y frk . x v . ,"z: ..5 ia Y `4. T , a'#'l, "..`:w
q.4 i d ,. xs,,it ` ,,, +t . ' :,.t ?5 ':...,1,,k,. kNft ` 4. r i U.. "'S Y o- r :, . i>•- .?.y ::.
Y. r , tet 'S ..s}, " "w`} i , . nu-'a `s r d*a`.: s
r, T, a '. t..; e
syb'§"
n 'r±}i gE t `,S v#°.'':t „} ? u.. . .Y s ' k A r 9s
s" '" r:,a t . , r .`^.,s<r"w eY'*". q'i"'ar 3 ,
di`+ f...,.:, r € 3" s+ i.. k' V„", 5 ° • 1,d u @ . d ' 3 «
i r
Legislative
b. To modify standards for sizes oflandscape material used to
replace material on established site planned project sites
Legislative
ce To increase the threshold for staff--level approvals for non -
residential site Plan Proiects that propose permitted uses (Legislative
2. TO CONSIDER A PETITION FOR THE CLOSING
F
ABANDONMENT, AND VACATION OF ALL OF 15TH STREET
S. W.WITHIN GROVENOR ESTATES (Legislative)
Ila The Chairman announced the information concerning these public notices from the
following memorandum dated October 5 , 2001 :
TO : James E . Chandler
County Administrator
DIVI N HEAD CONCURRENCE :
Ro ert M. Keating , AICP ; C mmunity evelopment Director
FROM : Stan Boling, AICP
Planning Director
DATE : October 5 , 2001
SUBJECT : Notice of Scheduled Public Hearings for Upcoming Board Meeting
It is requested that the data herein presented be given formal consideration by the Board of County
Commissioners at its regular meeting of October 16, 2001 . x ;
DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS :
Please be advised that the following public hearings have been scheduled for Board consideration ,
as follows :
October 23, 2001 Meeting
1 . Three LDR ( land development regulations) amendment ordinances are scheduled, as follows :
October 16 , 2001
142
iy w
tw t7 E `% ti ,Fx F•t
x. w} " )"'
yr qhs t
f
M. e A: c a#.,* ur fr a s fir 4, a-., £•,Y.h`
i i t
n . . . " . n . . ' e +, ..T . . WY .
a..`
f.= a.; "r,.xv 4" . .,y i4:= R A ,a 51 :+,I?. w. .2F,..:
x ,r §a h i.S IM,,
ya) S .' x4 .;. *,y+, i",A.+., ,.il° a,i , e a .9.°a `e m FT e•'.,
s. , < t „ '.
z r r .
n y. d S.n fi•y,"yp,+.,hN w .Y,»n t4`-y s 3
ur<d Y f's,' e. " .y #,Y` k. ; E« . ` h d t
v 4u i-
C
f3 At-. . „'x2. . `1`i
u vim! v LS i 4^` t,,.
4, aix , , .
t ,
cd^, yg re.,q d"'ax x..• r^z #ip€'"°, r-" 's '3. - "c s, '^'t a Z:`.
t
n:. •.. ;: e,: _: ^'. rpt."€ ass E s.x,k--z t',R^r 4"-x G" x,b 5 s"" s'.. „xr2.hs W's .9,.s" s a',' i+k"h"'" .,iw ,.. ,, d :
e .. 'R n. i i Y. y . 1
un VTM'
a. :•:3 l iti'.vv,j ft g<,F.y4 k 'ro°•,Fi $t k se";tM ih I vq ..s- r_ a 9 t . . , : a _., d,.. .., dr. a v.. .:r. L^Y.e ,:..nr, . w.,. ' a a n
e4:. i .f a r a, p,a`+ 'i',<:•. 'r. tnY,:: s`,
r,.{ ' :; . , . 9- ., ' w a
r C 4 . .t e• . 2 € 'ms a. xY*,pv ,.,...
c[ "„.
r,.. . . ,3...r. , ..,Yo N: Z .
x: - h
gin`^„ . z P t - y, . _ .. z#,.,, >< >,u i , .,..>.4M . c , = .'. ,. .. x 3 3 R_
h. 96{ . vY*v h, y % x. :
irv' . a5^
y,°A' 4. N'it
W.! N!'$
S x£ . :. : A"d)' fr fT' V P.x
d^. . 4..d 'n.` 2"":t'-. txy
tTi r ..
VIM
I 1A
a. Ordinance 1 ) :To update the affidavit of exemption regulations to conform with
recently approved comprehensive plan policies that allow use of the affidavit of
exemption process , as well as the subdivision platting process , in agriculturally 1U '
designated areas (Initiated by Staff) . [Legislative]
b . Ordinance 2 ) : To modify standards for sizes of landscape material used to replace
material on established site planned project sites (Initiated by Ben Bishop ) .
Legislative ]
C . Ordinance 3 ) : To increase the threshold for staff- level approvals for non-residential site
plan projects that propose permitted uses (Initiated by the Economic Development
Public/Private Task Force) . (Legislative]
2 . To consider a petition for the closing , abandonment, and vacation of all of 15 `h Street S . W.
within Estates . [Legislative]
RECOMMENDATION :
The above referenced public hearing date is provided for the Board ' s information . No action is
needed .
3. PUBLIC WORKSHOP ON PROPOSED INDIAN RIVER
COUNTY REDISTRICTING - OCTOBER 23 , 2001
The Board announced the following information concerning the workshop :
NOTICE OF WORKSHOP
FOR PROPOSED INDIAN RIVER COUNTY REDISTRICTING
Pursuant to Chapter 124 of the Florida State Statutes, the Board of County Commissioners shall
from time to time fix the boundaries of county commission districts so as to keep them nearly
equal in proportion to the population .
The Indian River County Board of County Commissioners will conduct the following two
workshops to discuss possible new county commission districts .1Arc
Workshop Date Workshop Time Worksho Location
Commission Chambers
Tuesday, October 23 , 2001 9 : 00 a, m. 184025 1h Street
Vero Beach, FL 32960
For more information regarding the workshops, please call the Board of County Commissioners
office at ( 561 ) 567- 8000, ext . 1490 .
October 16 , 2001
143
M4`.l- yt„ a,<"'',$,w n A* ' s ryr E smt: TY'7. t:`„f?s t ,E rk '+n,r y
4.. r'
e`k r ...y". c 'Y Ea vi;q i' zt€ xi ,aJ , i1
l;. r ,. , . s4 s. ,,l x,y A".,43c. «i <s'''$,q, _rr ,. vs . ah a - e w. , '. due P`v.
v .x - ,f.r;.. t R,:. 4 cs .,s n.,. . . . .. K: aA'krn. , . r . .. 1. . .. rvCkt:'5'S- .. 2. t.. yr fi t ..;.s R.f§
ui . w"' i" L a'a N Yn SlT r:A nFF'T "
Me v
y
xp.'
be
n a ,. a "S._ i . . - e aY... L,' *.. ¢ W l , . F.. t.s . p..t
w .'xM.i JE y,« i . . 55
Yr-n. ¢z x,t M4 sF Wb,,as. v pe. ' '+ . sfi
s at
21 s "xa 3 x unr i5
a e. . .v"+,-" ^$.: ,,.>Na -* ''6y"v'as a d:. a:' "d•"S`r~u g F.,, ''e`.<r $
u5,
t sa ty. Px,. u 5.....'s bx 3 ..f 4'7?' 1,P.. tt ee.z.. iE:: . e t r. . aha Tpc"tv`5 y , , 5" a,if• S 3`" s^ . X` x t' .
Ni4... , . e 4" e ti....FF. e jw
y,AV .+ . y ' , r.F.]Yx
TI .., a 4 c`5. 'Pn )£ YAb' x?' R M' b: l . " K'Ara':'S. .YP
Ttr ,. . VF t . ti v ifsP`i
q,,„ - ,. < 1,1 v. - r 4 Y ` rases^, kl 3 ro.
Vin•R+s u-Y. . . ' ,. ,; T
4 fi r ..:... r Gn. , .z c #.„„..,:>,u. ' fr t a x 4. . x .'. --. L^*. M-1”'
r= w. w . qc ,. ; 'i§t .
ate'
m r'. .. . „d... , u' x n 'f fi e m 'b«
u. v' r si$o- af s .r f •+G*; ,M
t. .`. .. , i y . , fi'` ,+'x.:'m s...±>E,3,.<r. .t x
s.+ r. .""'at5;.:.y. u., is h•+,a .sz „,- * . 4[ .?£ v',.i '3}} 7 r . . 'yr,. nmoi@vF.` ' :..f r sr t 7 ' ` J _'>
iti m 5
o Y,:C s"fle IIIIuz
o-. .. . v . a r
t< d s x
HeBel . RENEWAL OF CLASS C " CERTIFICATE OF PUBLIC
CONVENIENCE AND NECESSITY FOR COASTAL HEALTH
SERVICES OF BREVARD INC . TO PROVIDE INTER—FACILITY
NEONATAL TRANSFER WHICH ORIGINATE IN INDIAN RIVER
COUNTY
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of October 1 , 2001 :
TO : Honorable Board of County Commissioners
THROUGH : James E . Chandler, County Administrator
FROM : Nathan McCollum, Acting Director
Department of Emergency Services / / ; Z `0
DATE : October 1 , 2001
SUBJECT : Approval of Renewal for a Class "C" Certificate of Public Convenience and
Necessity for Coastal Health Services of Brevard , Inc . to Provide Inter-Facility
Neonatal Transfer Which Originate in Indian River County.
On October 5 , 1999, the Indian River County Board of County Commissioners approved a Class "C"
Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity for Coastal Health Services of Brevard, Inc . to
e
provide neonatal transportation originating within Indian River County . This certificate was necessary
in order to comply with Indian River Code of Laws and Ordinances as specified in Chapter 304 . The
certificate was approved for a period of two (2) years and will expire October 5 , 2001 .
k
The Indian River County Code provides for routine renewal of the EMS Certificate of Public
Convenience and Necessity on an application by the certificate holder . This can be accomplished
without a public hearing if the Board has no reason to believe that the public health, safety, and
welfare require it . Staff submits that there is no reason to hold a public hearing and absent that
requirement, the Board is requested to renew the certificate .
An application for the renewal of the Class "C" certificate has been submitted by Coastal Health
Services of Brevard, Inc . Staff has reviewed the application and no reasons are known or perceived
that would require a public hearing pursuant to the established ordinance .
RECOMNIENDATION :
Staff respectfully recommends that the Board of County Commissioners approve renewal ofthe Class
C " Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity for Coastal Health Services of Brevard, Inc . ,
to be effective for a period of two (2) years from October 16 , 2001 to October 16 , 2003 .
ATTACHMENTS :
1 .Renewal Application From Coastal Health Services of Brevard , Inc .
October 16 , 2001
144
U C i i i a3
A: r 1 w ,. v f. ,'' a, § ;e , fix .. '':.. s« r+ m &§v, k .. ,:r rv-;,
g
mx'`}'
u h
a 3 . sa, ks ?v..s-'
ii
w t;'#r-,., Sr ro .9n { ' „ h' = „ .,:,:: ;t';,' +x az b"#,•' f.{.:» ni" 'X.x•.,,}.'„.h.`Fs44n :: t 'x' i . . zar i' s fix°. .- n , £
F`
sys "°'3j?.t^ .:'.
s, „ + 4 . . tir. n e 'r . v . ._. ,o-.. a. r,. . ... a, ,.+ti t..,.3•-.u a # x,=« 3 >kr.. . . ,
v{,i. ,.
t. , ,., } ., .., . n',r".».. . .5 C i $; ,;`, ,, 4S n + v 'x'!Y ::&, .. H,.- e.w ,:s a ,. r_ 'i g= .T a' ' _-4.'a s s ° 4a .F5'. r .: xP+i n .. :.. n sF ny. . .. . x ,, •,]'
P, nt, T.B ::, ,fi.,+, r z..
k% „,a ,n.'s_ „r=.Yrx X . . x . 4, , ,4r”w*y. mr. . v .x:x s. S k k 3 y.*R. {{. "
r. x } 'sJ ;" Y + "s : ..r l . .
yg,s.
4.: i. . j3t 9 :
rt rt. . t Av 3. Y a 4e 'P. S, ` . , f3rz` s. .. . s ;"x^ zK xi,9,. •": f k na r rcX-*y.p
x ..- Y a
r,,•. . . z-, R..x ',y,
ON MOTION by Vice Chairman Stanbridge , SECONDED BY
Commissioner Tippin , the Board unanimously 4 - 0 ,
Commissioner Macht absent) approved renewal of the Class
C "Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity for
Coastal Health Services of Brevard , Inc . to be effective for a
period of two ( 2 ) years from October 16 , 2001 to October 16 ,
2003 , as recommended in the memorandum .
COPY OF CERTIFICATE IS ON FILE
IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
11 . B . 2 . RENEWAL OF CLASS E " CERTIFICATE OF PUBLIC
CONVENIENCE AND NECESSITY FOR ABLE TRANSPORT , INC TO
PROVIDE WHEELCHAIR SERVICES
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of October 1 , 2001 :
TO : Honorable Board of County Commissioners
THROUGH : James E . Chandler, County Administrator
FROM : Nathan McCollum Acting Director
j
Department of Emergency Services f. E
DATE : October 1 , 2001
SUBJECT : Approval of Renewal for a Class ` E" Certificate of Public Convenience and
Necessity for Able Transport Inc . to Provide wheelchair Services.
On October 5 , 1999 the Indian River County Board of County Commissioners approved a renewal
of Class ` E" Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity for Able Transport Inc . to provide
Wheelchair transportation originating within Indian River County_ This certificate was necessary in
order to comply with Indian River Code of Laws and Ordinances as specified in Chapter 304 - The
certificate was approved and renewed for a period of two (2) years and will expire October 5 , 2001 .
The Indian River County Code provides for routine renewal of the EMS Certificate of Public
Convenience and Necessity on an application by the certificate holder. This can be accomplished
without a public hearing if the Board has no reason to believe that the public health, safety, and
welfare require it . Staff submits that there is no reason to hold a public hearing and absent that
requirement, the Board is requested to renew the certificate .
An application for the renewal of the Class 'IT" certificate has been submitted by Able Transport Inc .
Staff has reviewed the application and no reasons are known orperceived that would require a public
hearing pursuant to the established ordinance .
October 16 , 2001
145
p
ljll 3C'
f
III y ; S :-r w,r v L > v rr
ryr w i
f
Ln'. ":.,•sF x
r p swd
s 's. s, ` ' t 3^.zs'x.
s v=.* r"' i"aH ;;',, r4::: ,.,,
axs y C7 r c'*. + i a #,, .s x ,,r'n,•€.e 5'tr, sax w, .r b r
e,yrer
1 t4n`s'»ai' i ,, t aasEr u'§£
r..., i rc .: e x .wSs'. , C'' R., a.. # ..' , t._, 5. . 5':n Y . Y:?` £ N. - <x '"#* ..+t .. .. .. _
za• r< x . r
x .' 5,. 3 v
5
e r a.,. x a. . ..x w , ... €' a r r a r z, • :N - S;.:, c
s a t a .',.3az kffi,,,.,. `^r ,-n : . .. ,# s•,«*" a. ...oA,«'rh ai r ' ,.,x xb r`°... zx. ./ >ri 4 " a . br x
y nl'c , _ W 5"'3. , v.-. v
SLC, •,
a , :< .4 x. ,g . . . . S`n _,..,I Y w ,1 ,:Y.i' r" 30,, ,.:t f , , '
x.;
My.' i Y d;y y ir`et,?' v.3-'.b,#' 'n.'4d u.>nk..t(Gi"ifrs' ,4'.t 3' P$m. v ..p rs,, -t`.. r,+'e a J', , s•; ' C
ry '
4 ;'Sy` .
z s 6,L me
RECOMMENDATION .
Staff respectfully recommends that the Board of County Commissioners approve renewal ofthe Class
E" Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity for Able Transport Inc . , to be effective for a
period of two (2) years from October 16 , 2001 to October 16 , 2003 .
ATTACHMENTS :
1 . Renewal Application From Able Transport Inc .
k
ON MOTION by Commissioner Tippin ,SECONDED BY
Commissioner Adams , the Board unanimously 4 - 0 ,
Commissioner Macht absent) approved renewal of the Class
It
E " Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity for Able
k
Transport Inc . , to be effective for a period of two (2 ) years from
October 16 , 2001 to October 16 , 2003 , as recommended in the
memorandum .
H
COPY OF CERTIFICATE IS ON FILE
IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
MCA . ADMINISTRATION BUILDING - ONE - YEAR EXTENSION OF
CHILLER MAINTENANCE CONTRACT - JOHNSON CONTROLS
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of October 10 , 2001 :
Date : October 10 , 2001
To : The Honorable Board of County Commissioners
Thru : James E . Chandler, County Administrator
From : Thomas W. Frame, General Services Director
Subject : Administration Building Chiller Maintenance Contract
BACKGROUND :
Last year, General Services requested the Board ' s approval of a contract renewal with Johnson
Controls for the ,Administration Building chiller . The Board may recall that the County had
initially bid this service out and had awarded the bid to York International . But, due to higher
costs ($ 729/month) and a requirement by York to tear the unit down for an inspection with the
County having to pick up the cost of repair at that time , staff sought out an alternative .
October 16 , 2001
146
r 1 i5
r.'` <,+ r u xrk s rr e A d rk i5..m
ra s
d`«. 5:' t - . :'h. c ,r„
ta Nuhfircr :tet R r b n T#M 2 t Sdlaw3h ^ fr .+Y2r, ,»k 3
s r w> x° F ,.., . ", ,. 2. '. :: 1'iaa.. f s t ..3 ,. i r 5 9 ,:. . r F.n ....vr ",' TK. ., E'r w
n
m
a a 5,_ .,-,> z : ,.::.? r.. ..r<e.^' ' ^'.x 4; r h
a :r , ,„ ' a. ,. x Etn. *. ': v", ...:...,. .r s., . ,,;u#' tzf`Y s.,. j,rc .rk. A , . r:, s. S".?.;s• S a wrw,.. In . 5": .v fi,. . r
a,
SIN,'t ta
main
a r x Wk> ;{.ti',%y 3r
h +s"x'. ,:. .w w ,. .. r z v ,p:'. W.. . e 1...,ae,. a :•ti.,s,.a8 a nK xtk' x r.,a , aS s., a,: + . a'.nt;. *;.,i,. .. i,u+'.. .,-, ;cgy.. .a -- . . x
y y1 s a.r•_r nes
rx';-, a.ieS z,..• .?4' K. ', .z u, " sa : ?``.3 :' 'F u,a4 ,..,,.. Y,rsi
s T>
sa"`',. ^bz.a,,.,:.,. i. z<s s':-., +, h < ,., ' „-: , rµ,„a,t t ,ssF,.,,,,. r sn,,m.a d. .=.. 1 ^aa a`.,„ z.zs'.',u',. t ».az' e,.,r., r. ,...
r v i'a,,.:N;, * + i, < r " .-«,. " J. a : xx i .,. :. ;, [ sa t z-a,a:SR''ap S' k. 'xk."^c:ix'..: c. r# z
a'¢:'
rt tY*s SFLF .4' 3x>_ L. r ra, . 'R:t. r.':. . , , s a tc Y a. 's:, S :. . -.x
H
b".3..vr . n:.. a`t''u." t"k+.i
t.'*_..
r 2 G: r: , c f ,i:f r.M ,: ,:. s ,' s - a+ $a . ,, t tE . ,y% r e. t , aR V 5. s + Y'a', •m ;r, x s ;
t
@';?x 4 2i. A g , a`x > wvvd a'`r`„ s"i `1i,'+Y, „xrS.p. moi" x+m. s ,tx x . h Y" W 7 s n:,;' , by S wc, 5,t, kZ"I x fi .±A.n ^ , x ' e . v , 2 K, ,t;,>:''1. ! Q y "
nrL
eft
v
1W1
Staff then contacted Johnson Controls , which was the company that had had our service contract
on the chiller . Johnson Controls was willing to extend the existing service contract for another
year for $ 650/month with the costs of any required testing and repairs to be covered under the
terms of the existing contract. This was a monthly saving of $ 79 . 00 a month and a testing cost
saving of $ 5 , 550 excluding any repair costs that would have been required by York International .
Johnson Controls has again agreed to cover this maintenance contract again with an increase in
the cost by 9 % by increasing the monthly charge from $ 650 to $ 705/month .Considering that
this price is still below the bid price submitted by York International Last year, and does not
ffer by Johnson Controls is the best offer.require the extensive repair work, the o
RECOMI'IENDATION :
Staff recommends that the Board authorize the additional year extension of the maintenance
contract with Johnson Controls for the Administration Building Chiller based on a price of
705/month .
11
ON MOTION by CorruTlissioner Adams , SECONDED BY Vice
Chairman Stanbridge , the Board unanimously 4 - 0 ,
Commissioner Macht absent) authorized the additional year
extension of the maintenance contract ( after approval by County
Attorney) with Johnson Controls for the Administration
If
Building ' s Chiller based on a price of $ 708 per month, as
recommended in the memorandum .
DOCUMENTS WILL BE ON FILE
IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
WHEN EXECUTED AND RECEIVED
MCI BID 44014 SHERIFF ' S DEPARTMENT EVIDENCE
STORAGE ADDITION - CHILBERG CONSTRUCTION COMPANY
INC .
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of October 9 , 2001 :
Date :October 9 , 2001
To : Board of County Commissioners
Through :James Chandler, County Administrator
Tom Frame , Director, General Services Department
October 16 , 2001
147
i 19 1 6
ffiS
e
tw,
s,
4`x
S2.,',.`
t,
i.?,,I„^
s,d. .
t`^S' axxF,.w`?.
e''
47k-i. ,....' .
Y,,,, "<r „-,
a;
s„ .
e.
Sn¢
M.
i'`w.
7i:
n'?'..;';
ir...;'
fi
g...£
w.
r:
b 3.a^
zrmsJ"$ae'._,3•
m
3..r°,.
i'
rt,-.
M,x,,,y§tsf,<`'t
rx.,_...
a,+,r'`"
r,..'?,.#'.
3..;°^.+°£. r d.".
1*.'
t.
b,,t:AF.=.
t3tc.oT'.>.,
a,i.,
I°
att:'
a"
e.p
s. .`..
3.
f>vt.'_.
z..
4dw.
o.s•:xA7"it..w'.".'
Na'
a`.+'
r„'t,-
F'
s_`'
v
av„
aas.
ra..
ufl„£„=+rs E't}
ons
y
r'fsG(t+,
3a3»
Tvi'
1
3 K+e
a b 5. +1» . . i f t„nY
3ha.,'.<
rs.kc ...> LS.,.:<,W ,. x c-'i a.,tis, ,cxr Y F'...>•,. . . ::t.`v'^?, rz .. =F Yk /k'h.., h'= . ^Ya. h kt
r"k-.. a: > a- . c ..kk,
M.,. : ec>4 55: .S fir . :.., : 'S r ;MaY rt -„3'
r`,:.,/ x t ,r}'ik'$f: W ^k `gy ..«r h; , s•`° J.ye Sxt:g,rr t. , . .r <
x S . z'rS aqs ,r,-i sFz a v ,2M3s aatt” . v iti ks SUM
e
Pt k
u;6„ ?,i'>>m,
f ,'.° , . wr r' m:Z•~Srx T ,,,'°.. eta r iF< .' n x, Srd!. ., t .,,:fv:. u
a5z'
ire Yx<kx.
A y
i T Sy ,a rt"42 f ,nN, 5 iY '-t' L 4 FI 4 q K'; .i.?1 t.. . a, r+ a.
Yi. rv: . t a"1,T.' rc'- .v T.e. Y v;. f:1::r r
3..F..R$y 4V y$n,,.
5_
If,
a ..?,`. x•.,
V,.. .
a <.. . S t L h ".'f. ,. r I" ' ry
y ,
r. i3''. Y . Y
x.'v'
vw : '°,y : x ^-.*. c ., .s.. .e rz ,.xa ,,.: a ,a. a, .. X . rsrr.. a` ter .a u..e ,a v c. <. • uk.: r. -, a.,. :,, n . m,. S , a, t-"4 z X :.:...f. rn:,r:,!a
gg_
a. T .
xn.. tt .h . u . -.>. .
y 4 se, . K. S. . x §,,. : h;. . , , M .s ..u. n. ,a a. ,z" t#
x.x..,•Y s ,e . . , - tN, t,:r? ,y r ,a,..R` # . rvs'n ,,. _ , . .« X r„v , ,.,,2. : a iF , , a ., . y5,.. cy,,,,,, x ,m.. .r„a",., , r "'
i " ' n_ ''a;` a <. ., . w f '.s . v: sL:• !.' * ,.v =fmw" v . . n a:..:;.av r a t.,.. , s s ,>x..3 s",n. P m yu„' k M .. ,
hc °(` T a- , esz ,. x,
n :
3„ ++ Y.xR,> , iRbg3kC • 1 `4s vv.; 1 r S'
Y`y $'fir. ^ro °'Yl^. -<d . F , '•,J^ i, m n x m A w"4 ,•i, x j;`F
From : Fran Powell , Manager, PurchasingDivision J I
Subject : Bid Award : IRC # 4014 Sheriff' s Department Evidence Storage Addition i
General Services Department i
r .
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
Bid Opening Date : September 26 , 2001 at 2 : 00 pm
Advertisement Dates : August 29 and September 5 , 2001 t
Broadcast on DemandStar to : Seven Hundred Ninety Six (796) Vendors
Specifications Requested by : Six (6 ) Vendors
Replies :Six (6 ) Vendors
BID TABULATION
Performance & Time of Alternative Bid , S- 1BiddersNameBaseBidAdditionorPaymentBondCompletion
Deduction )
MGM Contracting Inc
Cocoa, m 97 , 272 . 00 1 , 000 . 00 120 days None Given
Chilberg Construction
2 , 846 . 00 > Vero Beach , FL 107 , 673 . 00 17370 . 00 80 days
deduction
Summit Construction
1 , 000 . 00 >
VeroBeach , FL 108 , 000 . 00 1 ,000 . 00 90 days IIf
deduction
am Glover Inc
2200 . 00
ourne , FL 125 , 945 . 00 2 , 543 . 00 120 days
addition
onstruction of
South Florida 1281750 . 00 4, 750 . 00 None Given 1 , 400 . 00 >
West Palm Beach , FL deduction
Hennis Construction Co 1 ,440 . 00
Port St Lucie , FL 149 , 850 . 00 1 ,900 . 00 180 days
addition
RECOMMEND BID AWARD AMOUNT : Base Bid 1077673 . 00
Deduct Alt. Bid 2 , 846 . 00>
Award Amount 104 , 827 . 00
ESTIMATED BUDGET : 185 , 000 . 00
SOURCE OF FUNDS : 315 - 220 - 519 -068 . 41
Sheriff' s Evidence Storage Edition
RECOMMENDATION
Staff concurs with the architect ' s Dow Howell Gilmore Associates , Inc . )
recommendation to award this bid to the second low bidder, Chilber& Construction
Company, Inc. (see Exhibit " A ") . The apparent low bidder did not include their list of
subcontractors for the project or provide a price for Alternate S - 1 (Masonry Wall
Reinforcing) .
October 16 , 2001
148
J lib
r
r, k Yru, '}:, ., rx.a < 4r ' vi43, X .x• x2 r Fe"
w'* `t,u Ssu n r
c 5 6 Ni°t d' l t ac.., ' i^ r a- nw v >'
uxP+:, h l 3' n ,r i i t 4 5 R F'n„-
0 1<Y ' a se .x"
aL . C A >ee"°
k Y•.rcm.. s "b
t n^^+ 3. T 8. .,!. .:. r n, w . , n. .'na av+3 @ a h;..Xn 4a ,,..,tP,ro w ..r w s v
s : 3; . a fl i_ , +,a . _. <d }, .i. e 3 7
x „_5',r. :kY k F'3er.. , n.:.r. r x • `r, ..,J +2 tx. z .4 Y”t_. , , } tx,,,
i w:::.v'.' r-6xtNry"rt , v .v....t#' g °.,'sr
wi1 4,xLl `z; f.w ar ra . >+ n y, g,”,
irs,` : t , a^a '. m: 4 a . i Ca kx r w' ck d.
rix; 5' r x g ., n.a F' r. %' a • a a .«r r. .al, t .Uin..' rf
X..:;. ro & ,.% S u . y' . t"r',:*f a, 5. .:? e x' g;. p.. p x > x.kr`# :a r ,.. „ a ;• b , K ",, r".- A,
y,. -•" r y 4• sc,3x'2 S,
a
a s 4
r. , 3? v r" r i Y. s rm;' .3+q, .br, 2. uS a sa., : r`. . iTk , a { 3^ b3 ifTi r ohiy' ,a r'
h'...r, +^c3}a }:Fn f S.c,,d .x: x tKrx .- m, .4, . M r . .. a : . . .", ra- .,„
a v'a,.. ,. . w, a t ,t ,. a.> S>r,. ?^•",, v :; " n v „,.o-vt 3,. r T,... . ,>E .t , ..,.m. . , " . a w" r ,Lr .e . •.... 5s'+ ,
a4r,
r"^. .., +' '.,
fi°l it 2 k aur'., ^t ,.4 »r !, }. „:. , 2 . r_ r Y .ir. t G
n < *- u 7°i%. s' f«a`3ai : .,. pnr , „t, .xx z F X a 1Fr._ ,"v k #. '~s< Lcir3a r d` sm, ei. :;f. xXG:. .:x,h.. v` . < P YA k. . n ^u ry ,: . "E n 7 `..., x x fi.:7 e t W e uty F 3n.. ;=.4 s .
vlum`,be
r* .: e+. a..r:-r v u ti . Y. 5 ..,et r. . , ,:5. ,. 1-I ..,,5 . .. F'va-i 5 s ' a•
s T: ' . ' n. 'c¢ a a.Xt ,, .,n .. . .x, . cT. . , ,. c v r...: fi. . nat sus aA ..
u. .., h. . r ti L • m. .h`f. r' r x. 3 r4r e. . . ,4 ! .. ': x .wo
a
pp
P x uy- . .. {4,.
I a. L_ k . , .. .. . r S a4.yikX 5 wr.A .,: ~s`. n. sk,r 3` .1 ... h n. t h): V. f'1 . T~ P . . ,. . . u. fC-n::["+ .. ...x . t dx,.,, 5 s: 1. E ., ;: v . i kfr ., ,. t 4+. T. . k Y>. , '+`^y- F < r. . . ++4 iii , - .: ., P, w.+.. *, I, :. ... , , {r- -i. vu1'} , J,. w. T,. « k - .1?;1:.uv <;n.. t N.. + u..,,. . .i x;.. Wi, - rt xu. k53.,k .. ' T'Ei+n v . p% . m4:R h.,;, ,, uy y . . .. ll . fi. ,. 'v . r`o-
t
s
ON MOTION by Vice Chairman Stanbridge , SECONDED BY
Commissioner Adams , the Board unanimously 4 - 0
Commissioner Macht absent) awarded Bid #4014 to Chilberg
Construction Company , Inc . , the second low bidder, because the
apparent low bidder did not include their list of subcontractors
for the project or provide a price for Alternate S - 1 (Masonry
Wall Reinforcing) , as recommended in the memorandum .
ll , H , l , SEBASTIAN WATER ASSESSMENT - PHASE 3A - TRI-
SURE CORPORATION - PAY REQUEST NOS 5 & 6 (FINAL) AND
CHANGE ORDER NOS . 3 & 4 , BID # 3025
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of September 24 , 2001 :
DATE :SEPTEMBER 24, 2001
TO : JAMES E . CHANDLER
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
FROM: W. ERIK OLSON
DIRECTOR OF UTILM RVICES
PREPARED NIICHAEL C . HOTCHKISS, P . E. j
AND STAFFED INTERIM CAPITAL PROJECTS MANAGER
BY: DEPARTNIENT OF UTILITY SERVICES
SUBJECT :SEBASTIAN WATER ASSESSMENT-PHASE 3A
APPROVAL OF PAY REQUEST NOS . 5 & 6 AND CHANGE ORDER
NOS . 3 & 4
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY PROJECT NO . UW-97- 16-DS
WIP NO . 473 -000- 169 -489 . 00
BID NO . 3025
BACKGROUND
On December 19, 2000 the Board of County Commissioner's awarded Bid No . 3025 to Tri- Sure
Corporation (see attached agenda item and minutes) in the amount of $ 1 , 364,954 . 00 to provide water
service and fire protection to the above-referenced project.
On May 22, 2001 the Board of County Commissioner' s approved Change Order Nos . 1 and 2 .
Change Order No . 1 involved relocating a water main, force main and reuse main away from a bridule
scheduled to be refurbished at the intersection of 74' Avenue and 26'b Street.
October 16 , 2001
149
I` u
r....:' ,
Mx
f x
t .T
v s f.9.. , k '. : i . .. +.. : '..n u
fL. . .
y T ig . k r c} M
y, ": x Nr 3 24.. A 4
s z r r , A:;, ..,. s vk, . z;, , R . . .:o. .r: y a dtoa - .: , : . t r ,hx s ,. m,e k`c E r
r,r. mvrdee, ' s ef
a .i. S ,
kY . . ,, . !,. '. ;. '; ti; 4 °,s.. n . YxzsZ. . AA . „h'.Yc h 1 M'.... . .. Xs.P 2. .. w,i,#•nr@.'. . . .. aSyv:. yrz"
z,a a+k v, E ..,+ d. S.. r set: s x'- nor@". . -„ a `¢ J x s m, :% a a'.: z
Rw`€,
j t T a, , .,r 3.w.. r.,:cFx s q : . , d , t Ate,„. ,s t ret< ,r ' . , . ,F'Hk rw`'n v s. a,Gxa: . e. '. . i Y kms £- 'k4,:• a.
y f ... X.-: S” N Sia 1 5`x w
3nt* X.`. & J,,e , ,.
v41+: sa1 , xsu NAe s.`Ga-s.:r-gym a>+ . _...x.a , &'k. . „ s ..w `.3. . . .':<:.vs>: .. ,.r .T ,. !ss S x` S v„A,,. mec. h. .,3x e.k.h. » ,.a w. '3a d" a.G. a,3.adX... *fi5.a4r.:a, . , :> ,> ., ,
v`..
f...
S.,..f..,
N1 ,
r,
n(.
X u
Y,.,r}.
A:.
f....,..,
x,
i..,..
sa_
x.....
i,
c,.,, '.
J.,
Yir2,.
ls-+.„.
a..
S-„.
xrfi.e£.....
t.,'
xv2.
r,,..,,...,
h.,,,
a
a.
i.._.-,..
Y...>...
x..'''.:
krr
o-:..,,.,.-
4y...,=r`
sY'....'*<.,_.+'
R.,
s..
eS,..'^
gS«.,s.
k.;„
sd,
3d._
r5tW,...
58.
m..
c3I..AY,
m..
3.”.
nc:,..,i,,.E,,.....
a....
F.
r.
n::
X,+.....,..u,.
r.,.,
eK
t...,:$.....;H:°ET..,'..Y
e....,
a..
JL..
2z#t
y.`
s*kehh'..
c..,„'.>.tak...
n..
r'
v".,-,."„.
A...";..
ni.+"
v.,,µ`..r.::.
Y..:
c=
a...',.,?..:
rvx."...,....
s„
d...>.
b±,?
k-''
i,;
T?
k'a
scSsF.,
Y5”
u,..,.
e:,
e.
t
A,,.
C.
3r*...
5...:...._..«....".,;.`.;
n.-..'.`
z....>.-:„„:
x
o.:..,.Ss
y._,'.
t.'
a},x``,
a.kN,sr„1.ad.4xh,,..»
x.,..
e.:,
rU_...,.X..”...,
a.
e..d,.,_
w..
sss.,.
f...t...-,
rA..
x:.
r,:....
er5._,;',
n;
xe+.,..:
u...
1.,
fifi'
t'
x
t'ta
x..:S'.
s..
s..
S.;.,
x::,....Y,.
x>_
k..
t+.,,..,..:.,s,
t.,.,,.:'`c,.;,,<'
s:...'..
vs'
1.'
ySa,
n¥'
b4)
tz.,s,
P`.
aNe.
z.,
x.s,.
3'wn>,_a..
E-..;....',_.,
h...
e....,,.
x...,,.-....
r....-:.-..?s.^
Y...:'%.
k.
mw.Am'*`..a
hYz'=ryrr`
if
rt.
i."5a,„rx.y
h,+.
v,
i.;...
8
i.'.-:
t,a_
5u.
R:,. 3
b-
c
E>
4sF.
i.sz
t
TM
All work associated with both projects is now complete and the Department of Environmental
Protection has issued clearance to begin connecting customers . The Department of Utility Services is
now prepared to make final payment to the Contractor.
ANALYSIS
Change Order Nos . 1 & 2 increased the original contract by $85 , 648 . 00 to $ 1 ,450, 602 . 00 . The
Contractor was previously paid $ 1 , 054, 729 . 80 for 72 . 1 % of the project.There were miscellaneous
adjustments made to the amount of material used in the job (i . e . number of services, amount of pipe
fittings, number of fire hydrant, etc . ) . Change Order No . 3 reduces the contract amount by
1587271 . 00 (see attached copies of Change Order No . 3 ) . Change Order No . 4 adjusted the
contract, due to work associated with the bridge refurbishment plus included an additional service
in the assessment project for a total reduction of $ 5 , 042 . 00 .
The total of Change Order Nos . 3 & 4 reductions ($ 163 ,313 . 00) results in a 11 . 26% decrease to the
approved contract and adjusts the contract amount to $ 1 ,287,289 . 00 . Utilities staff is now
requesting final payment in the amount of $ 232 , 559 . 20 to complete the County ' s $ 1 ,287 , 289 . 00
obligation to the Contractor.
RECOMMENDATION r ”
The staff of the Department of Utility Services recommends that the Board of County
Commissioners approve Change Order Nos . 3 & 4 , approve final payment in the amount of
232 , 559 . 20 to Tri-sure Corporation, and authorize the Chairman to execute same , as presented .
MCH/c
Attachments
Y
ON MOTION by Vice Chairman Stanbridge , SECONDED BY
Commissioner Tippin , the Board unanimously 4 - 0 ,
Commissioner Macht absent) approved Change Order Nos . 3 &
I If
i <
4 , approved final payment in the amount of $ 232 , 559 . 20 to Tri-
Sure Corporation , and authorized the Chairman to execute
same , as recommended in the memorandum .
z
COPY OF DOCUMENTS ARE ON FILE
IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
11 . H. 2 . CENTURY 21 DEVELOPER ' S AGREEMENT FINAL PAY
REQUEST - HAN SHAN ENTERPRISES , INC
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of October 4 , 2001 :
October 16 , 2001
150
19P }IG9119
J
14ia M '. d 1' 1 5 , 4 2sYVia . 9. _ 1T L X s-. n w e . ':,.d z rkw , . hfi n” 'zd .d .o t y a.,A"is; x. b. .., , 5 a.,. . Y i a < .r a . :. " b
x x"4 Y: . . :
c::+
n ax. .. ,.,. Y , lY$ tre.tlC' fi 1 4--
s
x r.,.rs,. .:
a , z ..sir ,.
a. f . ..,.
x ,: .. . .-ad. - : :v+' ?t,es az 1,aa,..n .ax i, .a xyYe
F .. . v. a . S. '3 :a . 1 vr :, 4T ch . . , .. ,z x'1'`a f'"a Y a..:, < J'
wt ,,* ..
Y an^ fi{ dL s F ,x 3; -J :r
k r . LL t i '.., C x
e i aA S.J w; 1. u , . N I . u ,. N. . i e,..t , 4; gym n, . . '•e,. ¢ . . p, .. t4
i 4 c .
gg.,.:- .. .
a s.:.... ,., ! Y 1 #"... .Q t ;., t a lfih#`irycw x n-.. 'J , . .: h
y
T.>• Sf, Y k 4.9.` 5 x.
tiHi ^ta.. w. .c x Ki.. 4.' .c
3 xY. r ,c q. : k Y:S 1 1. =Y
rY i
u',. . r..aE N,Ya u us f . . 1 , y:3 e"`.,.:. , a .'Y . ;.%v`~6 .>•Er, l h 1 , ,f.,a, ru c T tt y?d taa`.' .$. S i .,kx [ t, ' ,:s, ac,y. z:v'"'*:. k Esta J si: irw,rw„1 _ Y^ 'r
rtt teK xn Y5 i .• s. y s:
k . ai' a .Y• . J_ ...,, M i,{'A.
n , a., e = '.. l`N ..S- . s" a 3»' es ' » ... . .g, ..,,5, o , . .. -. ,. k . ... »
r
k F
4
DATE . OCTOBER 4, 2001
TO : JAMES E . CHANDLER t '
COUNTY ADNUNISTRATOFr
R FROM : W . ERIK OLS ON
DIRECTOR OF UT ITY SERVICES
yy //
PREPARED NIICILaEL C . HOTCHKISS , P .E .
AND STAFFED INTERIM CAPITAL PROJECTS MANAGER
BY . DEPARTNIENT OF UTILITY SERVICES
SUBJECT :CENTURY 21 DEVELOPER' S AGREEMENT
FINAL PAY REQUEST
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY PROJECT NO . CDS/CCS 775
BACKGROUND
On August 7, 2001 , the Board of County Commissioners approved a Developer' s Agreement with
Han Shan Enterprises, Inc . (Richard Hibler) to construct a 6" diameter water main along a rear alley
way, south of CR 512, between Barber Street and Laconia Street. Construction of the water main is
now complete and the Department of Utility Services has accepted the associated facilities . The
developer is now requesting reimbursement for the dedicated utilities in accordance with the
agreement (see attached invoice) .
ANALYSIS
I If
The developer has requested final payment in the amount of $26, 535 . 00 . The approved developer' s
agreement budgeted $30 771 . 27 for the project (see attached developer' s agreement) . The final
payment results in a 13 . 6 % reduction in total project cost.
RECOMMENDATION
The staff of the Department of Utility Services recommends that the Board of County Commissioners
approve payment to Han Shan Enterprises , Inc . in the amount of $26, 535 . 00 and authorize the
Chairman to execute same, as presented .
MCH/c
Attachments
October 16 , 2001
151
C,4
w`
2c'
u£ xv r,3
v?.,.
Y"......
w
v..
Y.,,-,
z`..;.....,.."..
w,.
a,,.'
s,..
h...,.€._s....,
a.`
agYs>_'.,+`
r.t6.
r,'..
tf.
y,
r+
a.`..
o,
4..
k
c,
4..ex.....
or4}..
a.<,..
s
Y..%,...:,-..?:-
u..£-.
4..:.,#,..t..
r,'..,.,,.
ba°£+
v,
fiza1
r,
tsrc,`
Ys.,.5Y,4.`
Y,,
r,:
Mr.*rnx.
w,--:...,
J.,,,"$....r'...'.+.,.
ee,,;3g...;
M'
74,.
ri,
rw
a.`,
rkt-.
1s.
u`
uh..j^
E.
4.
r3tFC
r.....".
sr ..£s.-
n,.....,;^.:
r$
iu<
v;•.,.
s:
vF.cad.
r.
5gM. `}r.'
t.
eY'.
r
j.,
i,•
R'
G€
rxs
yksx
vBpi sdfxr .
k
4Fta . t
c
A
G•:wr,` ti T3, Y a, . t x ., r ,?`-.Y F w y,k. + w?" u+ a ...9 t .;ya . ."* an ,* i '"r sdx . 4 m5 e,, . , - v . a u. ,:m m: .. d ,. ., . 4, n , wN'ht., ,.x. F :, Z..." . F t.- t Rat' ' xs 5' S'3b° sr. . r . r,." >. . a t F _. ., .. 5 a G... x, x. ,a sa+,,'. n^.x v •"v ix L
T;,.. . :}Za •, 1 i5.;.€-, .. . . a 3 . . ,, '`'.r . .,. .. L ,..,,. .,. '`<,^. 1 d Y . . e . i'.s . t ,x u T;,..a:a , s
r. . N aix .. Y,.,, x... ns . ,,. ',^- r t ,, .. s avis 5?rr..>, a 5- .. . .. r *`,r
x`
s, J c;3.'.;y .: ,'
t..nk,v. 1 .. a _ .,
wx$
s':.,.. f.iF.°, k5r{' >v 1 -n:z.'0.. a. .<Cr`2 x7 fir , w.,., 4 e.:. y u , h.. .. , s h-. h:, • ,. .x... 4N; ns t. r SY. . i.. -a K. >.r* 5 i k`Vit',"14-
2
k
z
ON MOTION by Commissioner Tippin , SECONDED BY Vice
Chairman Stanbridge , the Board unanimously 4 -0 ,
Commissioner Macht absent) approved payment to Han Shan
Enterprises , Inc . in the amount of $ 26 , 585 and authorized the
Chairman to execute same , as recommended in the
memorandum .
INVOICE IS ON FILE
IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
13 . Ae CHAIRMAN GINN RESPONSE FROM SOMERSET
COUNTY ON RESOLUTION CONCERNING TERRORIST ACTS ON
SEPTEMBER 11 , 2001
When this item was reached , Chairman Ginn announced that she will report on this
at the next meeting .
13A VICE CHAIRMAN STANBRIDGE RES .NO . 2001405 —
REOUESTING LEGISLATIVE DELEGATION SUPPORT AMTRAK
PASSENGER RAIL SERVICE UPDATES
t Vice Chairman Stanbridge requested a resolution be sent to our Legislative
Delegation requesting their support of the Florida East Coast (Amtrak/Florida East Coast
Railway) passenger rail service funding for passenger service from Jacksonville to Miami
on the east coast of Florida .
ON MOTION by Vice Chairman Stanbridge , SECONDED BY
Commissioner Adams , the Board unanimously 4 - 0 ,
Commissioner Macht absent) directed the County Attorney to
draft such a resolution and adopted Resolution No . 2001 - 105
requesting that the Indian River County Legislative Delegation
October 16 , 2001
152
C% It
M F 1F+ 3Ptsi' .;" .r '.+ n H : 1, M., . r .W Fi S,ca .. n n `4m n_:n. r•qa ,:" v v r,, .r a. - xw .-
TT. .. . M- , 4.
t, v *t` y . . . 5 f ', .-. . ::, ,a z4 r' -;5 tb a,q : ..« ii '+ a :=4 '` s-. ,f n o. a ,. ..... ,1 vr,f3:,-:. ..,_ .r
s .x1 t . .. . x r t ..a:,n,. 7 y e•., . anP'k
r•. .x ar ., .r c5„.tt- , ,,
g "
mss . , , <e., t' h , , , e''7 a': i* fir:,, . .., . : z ',. .:v^* .m Y .a .. n
S
k t ,,. v 4 aY o W .s _ •,, r, ,t vX w' „y a S » kt.. >i ay h x sy.. ao3.ah t p^m vz. ,.Tsr,
X,..x Y .A.. r ..v.y .. Buz r x M hs T n" +. k.' e 4 ex...
x . ,.,. N ."d -r'G 3- ,.. c'e e>'i"'r ,., ,. , w
a
F, nir.. .. wk• tr ,w :.,,; K? ns,R..bx x . . . .,;'.'ra ,. r, ' ,. r,yru, ', .-:.: ' -P x"xi. K ke a
u 1 .3 v 3, " fi. . .5.,. .,.^"• s h 5v x. L'S,sfi«^4,. 5 - . F s, 0 t d,.r T .. . . K 5 uY: "Y5 z;•x) 4
xwu`>ta, dd{ zy, ..
t:.,§E „a. i ,. 'Y i j J .,. , :t".. 1^ rf, . _? y r krth.. 'Ys, n.:a. fi". T,,.a. ., r ,Y
e ,r xk3- x. Yx- r.<.,s>a, . ... Jt: a 4i fA d *;,.mum,. . xw 1 ,. . . . .. F' F x, / a 1 e t- t K iute: o-., r z t x. - t a_ ,r :: G e rt 4F. .. r ! t,u, .'x, Shvx X
r , :. x: . , Y e t . i S.; x f .{:,; E,:.3 . .? xt. . ,r ,i ux,, 9 t t5 t cTy. - .:'?~ I `. -r. }- r ° < .h N.. :..til I ,K :u.: -.. _ f 3,.
m..r._.. ., e ..I`^x ..._v>5> a `<x>., tGY s, W '.
3r°` h .« . ,: _ ...a. . . .> ut! . ._ -x. M.. _.rt- .. _ . 5 s ,.3s<... A' er; v: cr..s. ..,
4. . ,,. a f e ... ,.,= 3. rx . a a .,. .,. ZY.- W` i E" c, ..w t' LYiu.1`^F 55.
r -.. . , .. . , x a+. . .s t G u k 4 ... , r. z , .,.-3. X
nJ'` _s "a .: 4 • x"
t+,
g-e'..
tFlt. . .. .. . -.«a.n : .. x< . @ n. e sx nt .a, , . s., ws, .>•,c :, : re i' r k wx.. J° '.-r" e...,
If
If
Iv
a. t. .,, v.<. f . c s A4, F . . l.. 3 a :. . . Vb 9 T.- r _',v. c 5..4 tl k c:'4
N' S S "' ... u, 3' , i ntF <.. :. e S . ..t C <- y:.:5S W is "h+ rimY . t.:h`i
iG°' o- ., ,,fi,w' .. .*.i: f s . auu ,#2 r r t g y x, ..H:> :." nW ?a'.a z` vn X .y,?.+. dk 3F: r g4„ a v . +,
support Florida East Coast (AMTRAK/Florida East Coast
Railway) passenger rail service funding during the 2001 Special
Session of the Legislature .
i
RESOLUTION NO . 2001 - 105
RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY,
FLORIDA ,REQUESTING THAT THE INDIAN RIVER
COUNTY LEGISLATIVE DELEGATION SUPPORT
FLORIDA EAST COAST AMTRAK/FLORIDA EAST
COAST RAILWAY) PASSENGER RAIL SERVICE
FUNDING DURING THE 2001 SPECIAL SESSION OF THE
LEGISLATURE .
WHEREAS, the Florida Department of Transportation, Amtrak and the Florida East
Coast Railway have cooperated to develop the Florida State Passenger Rail Vision Plan, which is
a project to expand the state-wide intercity passenger rail program ; and
WHEREAS , this program initiates a new passenger rail route between Jacksonville and
Miami with new intermediate stops at St . Augustine, Daytona Beach, Titusville, Cocoa,
Melbourne, Vero Beach, Fort Pierce and Stuart , and
WHEREAS , the Florida Department of Transportation has requested $ 23 million dollars
from the Transportation Outreach Program for Fiscal Year 2002-03 to invest in Florida East
Coast Railway route improvements and construct eight new passenger rail stations ; and
WHEREAS , the Indian River County Metropolitan Planning Organization has identified
Amtrak Funding for Florida East Coast Passenger Rail Service as its number one transit priority ;
and
WHEREAS , the Indian River County Board of County Commissioners has previously
expressed its support for the Florida Department of Transportation ' s Transportation Outreach
Program application for Florida East Coast Passenger Rail Service Funding .
NOW THEREFORE , BE IT RESOLVED, that the Indian River County Board of
County Commissioners strongly urges the Indian River County Legislative Delegation to support
Florida East Coast Passenger Rail Service Funding during the 2001 special session of the
Legislature.
The resolution was moved for adoption by Commissioner Stanbridge, and the motion was
seconded by Commissioner Adams, and upon being put to a vote, the vote was as follows :
Caroline D . Ginn, Chairman Aye
Ruth M . Stanbridge, Vice Chairman Aye
Fran Adams, Commissioner Aye
Kenneth R. Macht , Commissioner Aye
John W . Tippin, Commissioner Aye
October 16 , 2001
153
sit 6+ i iJ 922
i rw
5r, .bf. a.ey.S'.a rhr T vtx tw cn K gi" aaky , r ! r h ia 'ti FF ,.«n ;:. b,3 3y 3S^ a ems :+. a "': :' Ffi- zas, *#.ro Mx w x '. a e. rs 1. .. S x.ry. .
w,`.
3 p*"3 , -.: 'l U ' , z• p{_;L',iy{e s5 . ao .Y ,,. i sm r . '.. . . , r mow . . w.,. Y f ns•9e.,. :.,;, Xr s., . °, r .., v s kx. ..3.r f ..- wt ,,.,i -t 8~^ , s'.f ...r 5,V Fs .yb. .r i s ...
n f /K c . ,. n+ 3t =.'(r-^. z l " . . c r 4 +,..n:x. a R ? Y~N ., . n k m, 'l x . '° k r`C- xi4, ,"".`'.mv r ' 3. r a-t 4 ts 4., u , x g ; .e., e p} z•3• 'r »:. r . i2'.,fi'4r k. s.,, r., , , . ,7`x:.*• . ..x. at a t., r v a .. ",5 ., a, rl : wtmr3 a d i:.; a 's , %i 'h #`'. 3'v . t n , 'r',
F L 0 1
r. ? . .
r. r. 9xV..i " e\
4x n' so- :: .ra . tea » s2? ay ^. t. o2 ' u . t G, '., ., ur8,ss,;. .. y ''4C'2iirt ,`i :° ,4 9 yk x
n 5 .. .< N, k .t C. .>.. 3 . YI . . .. - d 4 t
kx
brG -t. :, 7,. w.... k . e. i} h ,
x's.:."".¢ fi';, t 4-. v.
t.ve .;_ . y*.4 ^' ,nk ,+ Y,,L &. ,, "P, y ra* . v J..'L
ygx>''ve , 1 rY t sf •_
6. . `
i v y ,x C„M1 .-r ,.
3
d. t . -a .: , ', :, k.. T<. ,,; s y < hu srt sz R<.
1'F ::a., sr`ti . :.> . k „« a. , Q.2iF a a< -s m r,.:,r. a ..r3`sS.s . , . . .<xr- 3,.. k. ,. v` .> v 3# ,.z3 33:xa.
P _., .. . rte : ,..., tr<.. .. . , ....: : ,o ck.*.< -;a ,r .., ^'x^Ts "^Rm..,.r „ .;`4 it°_ar..'w' ,ii d.',Ua'<: ,k' .,,. .o:> o',, ,t< . : •_
a4 ,Iti:•? «. P ", i3•Py cSM.g - 3 5 ,R` a1 F= 3 :i,: '' dsa .Y . {, a
x2 x
eY. > k i. ".e. n . . .: a., : r_. .,x r4 ..e ei' -. t . .r r. s . , rra 4. t .. ry v7.sK' 4 r'pe yvy 33 .. `;,ks .x , fi ..,- r.7. 1<,., k+
RESOLUTION NO . 2001 - 105
The Chairman thereupon declared the resolution duly passed and adopted this 16th dayOctober, 2001 .
BOARD OF COUNTY CONMSSIONERS
OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
BY
Caroline D . Ginn, Chair an
Board of County Commissioners
ATTEST :
K . Barton, Clerk
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL SUFFICIENCY
William G. Collins, II
Deputy County Attorney
13 . Cele COMMISSIONER ADAMS MARINE RESOURCES
COUNCIL RECOGNITION OF VICE CHAIRMAN STANBRIDGE
Commissioner Adams displayed an award that the Marine Resources Council had
presented to Commissioner Ruth Stanbridge in recognition of her many years of outstanding
service to the Indian River Lagoon by an Elected Official for 2001 .
13 . C . 2 . COMMISSIONER ADAMS — LEGISLATIVE DELEGATION
MATTERS
Commissioner Adams asked that the Commissioners think about the matters they
would like to have sent to the Legislative Delegation and advise the Executive Aide of same
so those issues can be brought to the table at an upcoming meeting for ranking for the Board .
October 16 , 2001
154
E 9
of r
r ..,4 . , -... +. b +,an .;,. ':zz< TJ sY' ; `
L' ., . .s S<. .. t«< v.,. 4 z':xS . U> w n a r ,xs sa,.#, ..,?,,r.,, ` a.• .:,1 r+ F. :\ , z.
e. .
pp
r,, 2 x `a i s r, x:
a,.
s d hN r , , nk Y.:, .: . .r' , . . .s.. ,z:.r :Foo- ' ,,.4• . a . .,c: k m MY wv(> ' .,.. 4 d h : ', ...v c n, ,., us ry, . . . . xa' Yv , ., r"vc
fie, t 4., . .. ... . .. r , z ..,. 2'i . x p: a, e... 3. , . rd r. a i. :*,. ,a" a <. ' < y,: k z•< s x'"xSmYz..,. r z r F r,.;,a. fi F a, „+3 r.;. s y r ,.t. v ;• azy v b xr. . xz +>•xi'v T,>.,v a -.r .r„rs -,e.»z.' t xat z .::fzx. . vz4. . J, . ,A? r .. . F . .F...x S t. . <2 xa,.a . 4.... z a.r., ) e a{, :,; ., i •9x a",: ,.xs cHy -,e'#` *nf .. ,.e
k
s
r :
F
x
4 X
r . . - c R r a ray d.it a
Tl
DOCUMENTS PLACED ON FILE — FACILITY LEASE AGREEMENT
WITH DODGERS FOR DODGERTOWN
If A certified copy of the recorded document is on file in the office of the Clerk to the s
Board . This lease was authorized and signed by Chairman on September 7 , 2000 , and
IT recorded in the public records of Indian River County on August 29 , 2001 .
14 . A . EMERGENCY SERVICES DISTRICT
None .
TI
14A SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL DISTRICT
The Chairman announced that following the meeting , the Commissioners would sit
as the Board of Commissioners of the Solid Waste Disposal District . Those minutes
arefA
being prepared separately .
BeCe ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL BOARD
The Chairman announced that following the SWDD meeting, the Commissioners
would sit as the Board of Commissioners of the Environmental Control Board . Those
minutes are being prepared separately .
REMINDERS
The Chairman reminded everyone that a Special Meeting will be held on Friday,
October 19 , 2001 , at 2 : 00 p . m . in order to hold a public hearing on the Local Law
Enforcement Block Grant ( See 9 . A . 1 . above) ; and that a Special (Workshop) Meeting will
be held at 7 : 00 p . m , this evening ( 10 / 16/01 ) on Redistricting .
ITT
October 16 , 2001
15If5
ITtur
If
ry P ' . x4 L Y
g...
r c .ti-f. 4$".%moi '"-A' `
5^f
1`vt i '
h,y. . R
k yf} A .G
y (.. `
S/iA44+ . '" ,Y.Fw 4'r vAyx r Q f } y.. gra .
c
n .r""'
y,..
a, rM3r n
ekt+'
7 'i{", ' a
x., . :.*c 3k.
FaMrt
y ,,
y. e:..*
S S c
s i a,, ....,
i r 3y?S , 4 :y .
e"
rr
K 4 '-`g'
r. .
4..
L
n a.,r„,. 't.t - '
4
nom"
x x •, . v'.- :,. E* . . r , ',> 17x <.c x s a„ - r , t n" t sx r
w,r.. Z S. a,s ,. k n§ ti a Fn'y,:,Y 3 4W5
y.'t e:ryT t i s:'i. ,..+t. : ..txx r.. 5 s? <s
Md .:,.., . ,u: a x. : . xr. . a„ e .,7`,.r... !.r;.'S i :, n.: d `} s . , :, '. f yr a a . «_a : P 2>y x{ e ,>': x is i...i`nt fi3 . W. •Sa Ki eAr + . xf y, `5 r7 r' a .. `.y`.
s l a, M xw.f S' xw F`t7
r
There being no further business , upon motion duly made and seconded , the Chairman
adjourned the meeting at 1 : 46 p . m .
ATTEST :
Jeffrey K . Barton , Clerk Caroline D . Ginn , Chairman t _
p
Minutes approved, %?''1
October 16 , 2001
156
Z.Y a a ,. x . - `"u Y}«, .ti', ni.::a,,K, : y t .;a 4 ; c i x . ' . w ` wxt % ., s t w;;.- x `?
m - ar . ; ,r xrr x. . a.• s,. n,aM.: . z. 5, s +„ .,,.. . , s. n...,. 5 w ar