HomeMy WebLinkAbout1987-0384/3/87
rich
® i LR -Planning
RS/vh
RESOLUTION NO. 87-38
•
A RESOLUTION OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA,
AUTHORIZING THE TRANSMITTAL OF COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
AMENDMENT APPLICATIONS, STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS, AND THE
RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE LOCAL PLANNING AGENCY TO THE
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
FOR A MANDATORY NINETY DAY REVIEW PERIOD.
WHEREAS, Chapter 163 of the Florida Statutes, requires that
local governments prepare and adopt Comprehenzive Plans, and
WHEREAS, The Board of County Commissioners has adopted a
Comprehensive Plan pursuant to Florida Statutes, and
WHEREAS, Florida Statutes provide for the amendment of
Comprehensive Plans twice per calandar year, and
WHEREAS, The Planning and Zoning Commission, sitting as the
local planning agency, has held public hearings and made
recommendations concerning these amendments, and
WHEREAS, The Board of County Commissioners has held a
preliminary public hearing concerning these amendments, and
WHEREAS, Florida Statutes require that the Board of County
Commissioners pass a resolution authorizing the transmittal of
Comprehensive Plan Amendments to the Department of Community
Affairs of the State of Florida for a mandatory ninety day review
period,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that the enclosed
Comprehensive Plan Amendment applications, staff recommendations,
and the recommendations of the local planning agency are hereby
authorized for transmittal to the Department of Community Affairs
for a mandatory ninety day review period.
The foregoing resolution was offered by Commis-
sioner Eggert who moved its adoption. The motion was
seconded by Commissioner_ Bowman and, upon being put to a
vote, the vote was as follows:
RESOLUTION NO. 87- 38
Chairman Don C. Scurlock, Jr. Aye
Vice -Chairman Margaret C. Bowman —Aye__
Commissioner Richard N. Bird Aye
Commissioner Carolyn Eggert ye
S
Commissioner Gary Wheeler /Tye
The Chairman thereupon declared Resolution No. 87-38 ,
adopted and duly passed this 14th day of April 1987.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
By G
••
DON -C. SCURLOCK, ,J
Chairman
Attest: iU
FRED W IMf!
Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND
LEGAL SUFFICIENCY:
BRUCE BARKETT
Assistant County Attorney
APPROVED AS TO PLANNING MATTERS:
Gi.�14Z ! . lwy_%
RICHARD -'M. SHEARER
Chief, Long -Range Planning
G
s
Telephone: (305) 567.8000
April 20, 1987
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
1840 25th Street, Vera Beach, Florida 32960
Mr. Raipn aoox, rlanner iv
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS
Bureau of Local Resource Planning
2571 Executive Center Circle, East
Tallahassee, FL 32301
RE: INDIAN RIVER COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
AMENDMENT APPLICATIONS
Dear Mr. Hook,
Suncom Telephone424-1011
Please find enclosed the County's Comprehensive Plan amendment
applications which were submitted in January of this year.
The County's Planning and Zoning Commission held public hearings
on each of these proposed amendments on March 12, 1987.
The Board of County Commissioners held preliminary public hearings
on each of these proposed amendments on April 14, 1987, and
approved resolution #87-38 which authorized transmittal of these
amendment applications to the State for the required ninety -day
review period (a copy of resolution #87-38 is enclosed).
Please be advised that the Board decided not to consider adding
45th Avenue to the Major T rou hfare Plan and did not authorize
transmittal of that part of he Thoroughfare Plan amendment to the
State for review.
The Board of County Commissioners has amended the Comprehensive
Plan once this year on February 17, 1987. These proposed
amendments will be the second and final set of amendments
considered during 1987.
Any questions about the proposed amendments should be referred to:
Ms. Cherylene Boudreaux, Planner
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIVISION
1840 25th Street
Vero Beach, FL 32960
ph. 305-567-8000, Ext. 237
•
Enclosed are ten copies of the memorandums describing each of the
proposed amendments. These memorandums describe:
1) The present and proposed land use designations;
2) The location and size of each property proposed
for land use change;
3) Surrounding land uses;
4) Description of availability of public facilities; and
S) Discussion of compatibility of the proposed amendment
with the general policies of the Comprehensive Plan.
In addition, ten copies of a map showing the location of each of
the proposed amendments is enclosed.
If you need further information, feel free to contact me.
Sincerely,
AdIWy,IVI _k�
Richard M. Shearer, AICP
Chief, Long -Range Planning
/vh
enclosure
cc: Robert M. Keating, AICP
Cherylene Boudreaux
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
\\` INTER - OFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: The Honorable Members DATE: April 3, 1987- FILE:
of the Board of County
® Commissioners
DIVISION HEAD CONCURRENCE:
® SUBJECT: JANUARY 1987 COMPREHENSIVE
Obert M. KeA ing,6AICP PLAN AMENDMENT APPLI-
Planning & Ue elopment Director CATIONS
FROM: R05
rd M. Shearer, REFERENCES:
• A Chief, Long -Range Planning
It is requested that the data herein presented be given formal
consideration by the Board of County Commissioners at their
regular meeting of April 14, 1987.
DESCRIPTION & CONDITIONS
The Community Development Division received three Comprehensive
Plan amendment applications in January of 1987 and initiated one
amendment application at the request of the Public Works
Division.
The staff has reviewed these four amendment applications and made
recommendations to the Planning and Zoning Commission which,
sitting as the Local Planning Agency, held public hearings on
March 12, 1987, to consider making recommendations on the
proposed amendments to the County's Comprehensive Plan.
In 1986, the State Legislature revised the local government
comprehensive plan amendment procedure. The process now requires
the first public hearing by the Board of County Commissioners to
be held prior to the transmittal of each request to the State
Department of Community Affairs (DCA) for a mandatory ninety -day
review period.
After all the comments from DCA are received, the Board of County
Commissioners will schedule a final public hearing to consider
the proposed amendments. At the close of the final hearing, the
Board may adopt all, part of, or none of the proposed amendments
to the Comprehensive Plan. The attached flow chart illustrates
the Comprehensive Plan Amendment process as amended by the 1986
state planning legislation.
It is necessary for the Board to vote on each of the
Comprehensive Plan amendment applications in order to authorise
transmittal of the applications to the State for review. Three
affirmative votes are required to authorize transmittal.
ALTERNATIVES & ANALYSIS
The Planning Department feels that the best way to authorize the
transmittal of the proposed Comprehensive Plan amendments to the
State for review is through the passage of a resolution authoriz-
ing the transmittal. Since a second public hearing must be held
prior to action being taken on each of the amendment applica-
tions, no final decision can be made on the applications at this
time. However, action is needed on the attached resolution in
order to comply with the plan amendment procedure.
RECOMMENDATION
Based on the above analysis, staff recommends approval of the
attached transmittal resolution.
ATTACHMENTS Approved Agenda Item:
1) Flow Chart For: (A 14 PK 7
2) Resolution
BY: S_
do
O
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT
PLOW CHART
Applications
Received in
January or July
Staff
Review
Public Hearing
before
Planning & Zoning
Commission
Planning & Zoning Conmission
Recommendation
tPreliminary Public.Hearing
(Before Board of County
Commissioners
Applications Submlttud to
Department of Community Affairs
Comments Requested from
Treasure Coast Regional
Planning Council
Treasure Coast Submits Comments
Comments Requested from
nearby local Governments
iLocal Governments submit)
comments
Department of Community Affairs
submits comments
:aaff Incorporates comments in
miff report
Ilioard of County Conuuis loner:; hold!;
l
final public hearinq!;
All, some or nonu of uie proposed �J
amendmcn_L; are adopted
Also, the County's Comprehensive Land Use Plan designates a 650
acre Industrial/Commercial Node at the intersection of 1-95 and
C.R. 512. These 650 acres are designated for future industrial
and commercial development in this area which will require
additional major roads.
RECOMMENDATION
Based on the above analysis, the staff recommends approval of
these changes to the Thoroughfare Plan as an amendment to the
Transportation Element of the Comprehensive Plan.
Mr. Shearer stated that on March 11, 1987 the Transportation
Planning Committee considered all of the amendments and they
voted 6-0 to recommend approval of the amendments as proposed.
Chairman Tippin asked if anyone wished to speak for or
against this item, and there was no one.
There being no one who wished to speak, Chairman Tippin
declared the public hearing closed.
On MOTION by Ben Bailey, SECONDED
by John Brenner, the Commission voted
5-0 to recommend to the Board of County
Commissioners that the Amendment to the
Transportation Element of the Comprehensive
Plan, be approved.
ITEM #6 - County -Initiated Request.
To amend the zoning ordinance to establish Residential
Treatment Centers as a special exception use in the CG,
General Commercial District.
Tile hour of 7:30 P. M. having passed, the following notice,
with proof of publication was read:
47
W '
\ INDIA R VER COUNTY, FLORIDA c�zz��yy�,s,ti
INTER- OFFICE MEMORANDUi1��X �� e7 �3�i
TO: The Honorable Members` DATE: March 17, 1987 FILE:
of the Board of County
Commissioners
DIVISION HEAD CONCURRENCE:
® SUBJECT: AMENDMENT TO THE TRANS -
Robert M. Keatipg,A PORTATION ELEMENT OF THE
Planning & Developme Director COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
5 THROUGH: Richard M. Shearer, AICP
Chief, Long -Range Planning
FROM: Cherylene J. Boudreaux REFERENCES:
_ Staff Planner, Long -Range Planning
It is requested that the data herein presented be given formal
consideration by the Board of County Commissioners at their
regular meeting of April 14, 1987.
DESCRIPTION & CONDITIONS
The Public Works Division has requested an amendment to the
Transportation Element of the Comprehensive Plan amending the
Thoroughfare Plan as follows:
(1) Deleting 43rd Avenue between 53rd Street and 69th
Street as a primary collector;
(2) Adding 43rd Avenue as a secondary collector between
53rd Street and 57th Street;
(3) Adding 45th Avenue as a north/south secondary collector
between 65th and 69th Streets east of Lateral "G" Canal
in the east half of Section 9, Township 32S, Range 39E.
In addition, the staff requests adding (3) three secondary
collector roads to the Thoroughfare Plan.
Specifically, these roads are as follows:
(1) Adding 98th Avenue as a secondary collector from 87th
Street north to the Fleming Grant line;
(2) Adding 106th Avenue as a secondary collector, from C.R.
512 north to the Fleming Grant line;
(3) Adding 102nd Terrace as a secondary collector from C.R.
512 north to the Hetra Computer and Telecommunications
Industries facility located in Section 26 of Fleming
Grant.
On March 11, 1987, the Transportation Planning Committee
voted 6 -to -0 to recommend approval of the proposed amendments as
presented.
On March 12, 1987, the Planning and Zoning Commission voted
5 -to -0 to recommend approval of the proposed amendments to the
Transportation Element of the Comprehensive Plan amending the
Thoroughfare Plan.
ALTERNATIVES & ANALYSIS
These requested amendments are based upon accommodating traffic
demand generated by existing as well as future planned growth
located in these areas. In addition, the siting of the Bent Pine
development in the planned 43rd Avenue corridor north of 57th
Street warrants eliminating that road from the Thoroughfare Plan.
Form 100-101-1 ��
The requested addition to the Thoroughfare Plan of 102nd Terrace
as a secondary collector located next to iietra Industries is
® substantiated by the fact that eighty feet (80') of right-of-way
exists and a portion of the road is already paved.
Also, the County's Comprehensive Land Use Plan designates a 650
acre Industrial/Commercial Node at the intersection of I-95 and
C.R. 512. These 650 acres are designated for future industrial
and commercial development in this area which will require
additional major roads.
RECOMMENDATION
Based on the above analysis, including the Planning and Zoning
Commission's recommendation, staff recommends approval of these
• • changes to the Thoroughfare Plan as an amendment to the
Transportation Element of the Comprehensive Plan.
ATTACHMENTS
1) Proposed Thoroughfare Plan Map with changes
2) Current Thoroughfare Plan Map
3) Minutes of the Planning and Zoning Commission meeting of March
12, 1987
APPROVED AGENDA ITEM:
For:L1�y'U7
By:_ —
Trans. Element Memo
cherii
40
•
ATTACHMENT /1
i41
STATE FID -140
..
�L
ATTACHMENT •2
IeX,IS i'INQ
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
Thoroughfare Pian
ARTERIAL
PRIMARY COLLECTOR rMlwl
SECONDARY COLLECTOR
E
�1
1�u
V
1
i
:11
6/1111
r
rrrA
S
r
rri
r
i
r� )
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM-n.� �``,�c"G� Z--
TO: The Honorable Members DATE: April 2, 1987 FILE:
of the Board of County
0 Commissioners
DIVISION HEAD CONCURRENCE:
Zr
SUBJECT: DEVELOPMENT PARTNERS,
Robert M. Keat g, P INC. REQUEST TO AMEND THE
Planning & Developm t Director COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND
AND REZONE APPROXIMATELY
4.4 ACRES
FROM' Richard M. Shearer REFERENCES:
Chief, Long -Range Planning
It is requested that the data herein presented be given formal
consideration by the Board of County Commissioners at their
regular meeting of April 14, 1987.
DESCRIPTION & CONDITIONS
Development Partners, Inc., an agent for the Beach Bank, the
trustee, is requesting to amend the Comprehensive Flan by
redesignating 4.4 acres from LD -2, Low -Density Residential 2 (up
to 6 units/acre), to Commercial, and to rezone from RM -6,
Multiple -Family Residential District, to CG, General Commercial
District. The applicants intend to develop the subject property,
and 18 contiguous acres to the south, for a. shopping center. The
applicants are making this request so that they can align their
entranceway on the westside of Kings Highway with the existing
entranceway to Ryanwood on the eastside of Kings Highway.
Because the County's Comprehensive Plan is structured to
concentrate commercial development in nodes, and because of the
subject property's location adjacent to the existing Kings
Highway and State Road 60 node, this application is considered a
request to enlarge the existing node from 160 to 165 acres.
On March 6, 1985, the Board of County Commissioners enlarged tho
Kings Highway and State Road 60 node from 140 to 160 acres.
On April 10, 1985, the Board of County Commissioners adopted an
ordinance establishing boundaries for the 160 acre Kings Highway
and State Road 60 node.
On March 12, 1987, the Planning and Zoning Commission voted
3 -to -2 to recommend approval of these requests.
ALTERNATIVES & ANALYSIS
In this section, an analysis of the reasonableness of the appli-
cation will be presented. The analysis will include a descrip-
tioi, of the current and future land uses of the site and sur-
rounding areas, potential impacts on the transportation and
Utility systems, and any significant adverse impacts on environ-
mental, quality.
Existin�nd Use Pattern
The subject is property is undeveloped. North of the subject
Property
RM-6. a 10 acre parcel of land which is undeveloped and
sub)• Further north, approximately 350 feet north of the
zonedct property' is Rivera Estates, a single-family subdivision
units/acre). Single -Family Residential District (up to 6
is Ryanwood Shop asp of the subject property, across Kings Highway,
proper is ping Center zoned CG. South of the subject
across State undeveloped
r,() land and a bank zoned CG. Further south,
single-family residence and andwateroP werazoned CGruiWe t of tand�tkie
Residentialnd
subjectpertDistrictil undeveloped land zoned RM -6, Multiple -Family
(up to 6 units/acre).
Form 100-101-1
J
Future Land Use Pattern
40 The Comprehensive Plan designates the subject property and the
land north and west of it as LD -2, Low -Density Residential 2 (up
to 6 units/acre). The land east and south of the subject
property is included in the Kings Highway and State Road 60
0 commercial node.
In analyzing this request, staff looked at the amount of
commercial acreage available in this node and analyzed the
applicant's request from the aspect of aligning the entrance to
the proposed commercial development on the west side of Kings
Highway with the existing entrance to Ryanwood on the eastside of
Kings Highway. Currently, this node contains 160 acres with the
acreage broken down as follows:
1) Winn-Dixie Shopping Center and adjacent
commercial uses west of 43rd Avenue 6.38 acres
2) Indian River Farms Drainage District
office and Mobil Service Station .59 acres
3) Ed Schlitt Agency .19 acres
4) First Union West Side Banking Facility 1.79 acres
5) Ryanwood Shopping Center. 18.68 acres
6) Oak Terrace Restaurant Site 2.1 acres
7) Vacant Commercial property located east
of Kings Highway 70.81 acres
8) County water tower & City power
substation 1.53 acres
9) Florida National Bank 2.0 acres
10) Vacant Commercial property located west
of Kings Highway 55.94 acres
Based on this acreage breakdown, there are 33.26 acres of land in
the node which are developed in commercial uses, and 126.75 acres
which could be developed for commercial use. The existing
commercial develr.pment represents approximately 21 percent of the
acreage of the rode. In August of 1935, the existing commercial
development in the node accounted for 11.05 acres or 7 percent of
the acreage of the node. While there is still a large amount of
land in the rode available for development, the percentage
devoted to commercial use has increased rapidly and is
anticipated to continue to increase as the State Road 60 corridor
continues to develop.
In analyzing the applicant's desire to align their entranceway
with Ryanwood's entrance on Kings Highway, staff notes that it is
desirable to align such entranceways from a traffic circulation
standpoint and that the alternative is to have an entranceway to
the property on the westside of Kings Highway located closer to
State Road 60. Staff also notes that if the subject property is
included in the node and rezoned commercial there would be a ten
acre parcel of land left between the subject property and the
single-family subdivision to the north which could be developed
for multiple -family residences to create a land use buffer.
Transportation
The subject property has direct access to Kings Highway
(classified as an arterial street on the County's Thoroughfare
Plan). If developed with the property to the south, direct
access would also be available to State Road 60 (also classified
as an arterial street). Development of the subject property and
the adjoining 18 acre parcel of land for a shopping center could
generate up to 9,868 average annual daily trips (AADT). State
Road 60 currently carries approximately 14,000 AADT at
/aa
level -of -service "A". Kings Highway currently carries 5,100 AADT
at level -of -service "A". This additional traffic would not lower
1b,
the level -of -service on State Road 60 or Kings Highway.
Moreover, Kings Highway is scheduled to be rebuilt as a four -lane
divided road with left turn lanes during 1987 which will improve
traffic conditions in this area.
Environment
The subject property is not designated as environmentally
sensitive nor is it in a flood -prone area.
Utilities
County water and wastewater facilities are available.
RECOMMENDATION
Based on the above analysis, staff recommends that the Board of
County Commissioners authorize the staff to transmit this
Comprehensive Plan amendment request to the State for review.
ATTACHMENTS
1) Application
2) Location Map
3) Planning and Zoning Commission minutes of 3-12-87
Approved Agenda Item:
For: q1 tq In
By: Ci�)
Dev. Partners Memo
Rich
�a�
ab
s
SUBJECT PROPERTY .-I
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA'
INTER - OFFICE MEMORANDUM
d—. A7- 3J_
TO: The Honorable Members DATE: April 2, 1987 FILE:
of the Board of County
to Commissioners
DIVISION HEAD CONCURRENCE:
® 4��U� K4,!* -SUBJECT: PENN MOBIL PARTNERSHIP/
Robert M. Keat ng,P HATALA/STENGER REQUEST
Planning & Development Director TO AMEND THE COMPRE-
HENSIVE PLAN AND REZONE
3 ACRES
FROM:hard M. shearer, REFERENCES:
Chief, Long -Range Planning
It is requested that the data herein presented be given formal
consideration by the Board of County Commissioners at their
regular meeting of April 14, 1987.
DESCRIPTION & CONDITIONS
Michael O'Haire, an agent for Penn Mobil Partnership, Ronald
Hatala and Daryl Stenger, the owners, is requesting to amend the
Comprehensive Plan by redesignating 3 acres located 200 feet east
of U.S. 1 and south of 35th Street from MD -1, Medium -Density
Residential 1 (up to 8 units/acre), to MXD, Mixed -Use District
(up to 6 units/acre), and to rezone this property from RM -6,
Multiple -Family Residential District, (up to 6 units/acre), to
CG, General Commercial District.
The owners would like to develop this property for retail
businesses and mini -storage facilities.
on March 12, 1987, the Planning and Zoning Commission voted
5 -to -0 to recommend approval of amending the Comprehensive Plan
and rezoning the west 150 feet of the subject property. The
Planning and Zoning Commission denied the request for the east
550 feet of the subject property because of the configetration of
the subject property which is extremely deep east -west and narrow
north -south. The applicants have appealed this decision.
ALTERNATIVES & ANALYSIS
In this section,
cation will be 1
tion of the cur.
rounding areas,
utility systems,
mental quality.
an analysis of the reasonableness of the appli-
)resented. The analysis will include a descrip-
cent and future land uses of the site and sur -
potential impacts on the transportation and
and any significant adverse impacts on environ -
Existing Land Use Pattern
The subject property is undeveloped. North of the subject
property are single-family residences and mobile homes zoned
RM -6. East of the subject property is undeveloped land zoned
RM -6. South of the subject property are single-family dwellings,
mobile homes and vacant land in the County zoned RM -6 and
single-family dwellings, vacant land and a used car dealer in the
City of Vero Beach zoned commercial. west of the subject
property is a single-family house with a detached garage and
accessory apartment in the City of Vero Beach zoned commercial.
Further west is U.S. 1 and the F.E.C. railroad.
Future Land Use Pattern
The Comprehensive Plan designates the subject property and the
land east, south and immediately north of it as MD -1,
Medium -Density Residential 1 (up to 8 units/acre). Approximately
150 feet north of the subject property is the 205 acre
Form 100-101-1
hospital/ commercial node centered around Indian River Memorial
Hospital. The land west of the subject property is designated
A commercial by Vero Beach's Comprehensive Plan.
During the Spring of 1986, the City and County planning staffs
studied the area around the subject property to determine the
0 appropriate zoning. At that time, the City was considering
detaching the area east of U.S. 1 and north of the Main Relief
Canal from the City Limits. The County Planning staff
recommended that if the property was detached from the City that
the County establish an MXD, Mixed Use District, running 350 feet
east of the existing east right-of-way line of U.S. 1 from 35th
Street south to 33rd Street and zone this area CL, Limited
Commercial District. The Board of County Commissioners
considered this recommendation in June of 1986 and agreed with
so the staff recommendation for the MXD area but felt that the CG,
General Commercial District, would be more appropriate.
In analyzing this request, staff relied on the work done in 1986
and feels that the west 150 feet of the subject property should
be designated MXD and rezoned to CG. This would be compatible
with the City's commercial zoning and commercial land use
designation for the 200 foot strip of property lying west of the
subject property and east of U.S. 1. The applicants would then
have commercial zoning for a depth of 350 feet from U.S. 1.
Trans ortation System
The subject property will have access to U.S. 1 (classified as an
arterial street on the County's Thoroughfare Plan). The maximum
development of the subject property under CG zoning could
generate up to 2741 average annual daily trips (AADT). U.S. 1
currently handles 21,900 AADT in this area at level -of --service
"C". This additional traffic will not diminish this
level -of -service.
Environment
The subject property is not designated as environmentally
sensitive nor is it in a flood -prone area.
Utilities
Water is available for the subject property. County wastewater
facilities are not available.
RECOMMENDATION
Based on the above analysis, including the Planning and 'Zoning
Commission's recommendation, staff recommends that the staff be
authorized to transmit to the State the request to amend the
Comprehensive Plan for the west 150 feet of the subject property
to be redesignated as MXD. The staff also recommends that the
staff be directed to initiate a comprehensive plan amendment
request in July to establish an MXD area from 35th Street south
to the Vero Beach City limits.
ATTACHMENTS
1) Applications
2) Location Map
3) Planning and Zoning Commission minutes of 3-12-87
Approved Agenda Item:
For: V 1
By: CX
Hatala Memo
betty2
H7
40
I . SIIJBJECT. PROPERTY'
JL."buLUJ-N I
l "..
C,:
RM -6