HomeMy WebLinkAbout2/13/1996� MINUTE"ITTACHEIW
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
A G E N D A
TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 13,1996
9:00 A.M. - COUNTY COMMISSION CHAMBER
County Administration Building
1840 25th Street
Vero Beach, Florida
Fran B. Adams, Chairman (District 1)
Carolyn K. Eggert, Vice Chairman (District 2)
Richard N. Bird (District 5)
Kenneth R Macht (District 3)
John W. Tippin (District 4)
James E. Chandler, County Administrator
Charles P. Vitunac, County Attorney
Jeffrey K. Barton, Clerk to the Board
9:00 a.m. 1. CAT I TO ORDER � K P
PAGE S
3. PLEDGE OF AT FGTANCF - Comm. John W. Tippin
4. ADDITIONS to the AC.FT*MA/FMF.V -1 W!`v Tyre
7.J. NATOA Conference Attendance
13.A. Sebastian Inlet Taxing District
13.C. Treasure Coast Private Industry Council (Job Training
Corsortium)
13.D. Comment on Criticism of Bob Keating re: LAAC
recommendations.
" I 111 w u M R 1
Presentation of Proclamation Honoring Barnette E. Greene, Jr.
on His Induction into the Florida Agricultural Hall of Fame 1
1 1 ull�l 11Y
Regular Meeting of January 23, 1996
1 L Til : L11
A. Received & Placed on File in Office of Clerk to Board:
* T.R.C. MenL Hosp. Schedule of Regular
Meetings for 1996
* I.R.C. Mem. Hosp., Inc. & Subsidiaries -
Consolidated Finalcial Statements,
Sept. 30,1995 and 1994
* Report of Convictions, January 1996
B. Golf Cart Path Release of Retainage
(memorandum dated February 1, 1996) 2-7
Bou 97 FAu-258
BOOK 97 N� r,E 259
7. CONSENT
A ..NDA (on 'd )•
PAG
' C.
GHA Harbor Ltd.'s Request for Planned
Development (PD) Final Plat Approval for
Harbor Links, Grand Harbor Plat 17
(a.k.a. Harbor Links Phase H)
(memorandum dated February 6, 1996)
8-14
D.
Temporary Water Service Agreement -
Indian River County and Juanita Harris
(memorandum dated January 22, 1996)
15-23
E.
Temporary Water Service Agreement -
Indian River County and Christopher P.
Schutt and Charlene W. Schlitt
(memorandum dated January 22, 1996)
24-30
F.
Temporary Water Service Agreement -
IRC and Vick & Rachelle Campbell
(memorandum dated January 22,.1996)
31-36
G.
Temporary Water Service Agreement -
IRC and Frank J. Schutt, Sr.
(memorandum dated January 22, 1996)
37-42
H.
Miscellaneous Budget Amendment 013
(memorandum dated February 7, 1996)
43-45
I.
ESSX Telephone Service
(memorandum dated Fpbruary 6, 1996)
46-51
8. CONSTiTiM
NAL FFiCF S and
None
9:05 A.M. 9. PIJBlrjc
ITEMS
A.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
None
B.
PUBLIC DISCI SSTON rmMS
None
10. COUNTY
AD MINiSTRATORNS MATTERS
Suggestion Program
(memorandum dated February 7, 1996)
52
11. DEPARTMF.NTAi
MATTERS
A.
Communes evelo went
None
M
11. DEPARTMENTAL
MATTERS (con_ t� PAG "
' B.
Emergency Services
None
C.
General Services
- -
None
D.
Leisure Services
None
E.
Office of Management and Bud et
Preliminary Budget Review
(will be presented at the end of the regular
meeting - backup provided under separate
cover)
F.
Personnel
None
G.
Pub is Works
None
H.
Thilihe
1. Hobart/Gifford Wastewater Interconnect
Effluent Transmission
(memorandum dated January 31, 1996) -_ 53-67
2. South Regional Effluent Reuse System
Final Pay Request
(memorandum dated January 16, 1996) 68-69
12. COUNTY
ATTO NFY
None
1 ��lul 1 0 NW Ai7i
ri 77 M 1148r
9®oK 97 PAU 260
BOOK 97 PAGE 261
13. COMMi. 4I0 41TFMc (sont9d PAGE
C. Co miasioner Richard N B'rd
14.
D. Commissioner Kenneth EL Mar6t
E. Commissioner John W Tinn.n
A. F=meroencv cervices Di trio
None
B. Solid Waste Disposal District
None
C. F.nvironmen al Control Board
None
c ) 1; ►lul ►Y
ANYONE WHO MAY WISH TO APPEAL ANY DECISION WHICH MAY 13F MADE
AT THIS MEETING WILL NEED TO ENSURE THAT A VERBATIM RECORD OF THE
PROCEEDINGS IS MADE WHICH INCLUDES THE TESTIMONY AND EVIDENCE UPON
WHICH THE APPEAL WILL BE BASED.
ANYONE WHO NEEDS A SPECIAL ACCOMMODATION FOR THIS MEETING MAY
CONTACT THE COUNTY'S AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT (ADA)
COORDINATOR AT 567-8000 X408 AT LEAST 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE nF MRP.TiNr*
Meeting broadcast live on:
TCI Cable Channel 13 - rebroadcast S: 00 p.m. Thursday through S: 00 p.m. Friday
Falcon Cable Channel 35 - rebroadcast Friday evening
m r
INDEX TO MINUTES
February 13, 1996
Regular Meeting of Board of County Commissioners
ADDITIONS TO THE AGENDA/EMERGENCY ITEMS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
PROCLAMATION HONORING BARNETTE E. GREENE, JR. - ELECTION TO FLORIDA
AGRICULTURAL HALL OF FAME . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
APPROVALOF MINUTES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
CONSENT AGENDA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
A. Reports . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
B. Sandridge Golf Club - Golf Cart Path - Release of Retainage -
Timothy Rose Contracting, Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
C. GRA Harbor Ltd. - Harbor Links (Phase II), Grand Harbor Plat
17 - Planned Development (PD) Final Plat Approval . . . . . .
D. Temporary Water Service Agreement - Juanita
Harris . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
E. Temporary Water Service Agreement - Christopher P. Schlitt and
Charlene W. Schlitt . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
F. Temporary Water Service Agreement - Vick & Rachelle
Campbell . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
G. Temporary Water Service Agreement - Frank J. Schlitt, Sr. . .
H. Miscellaneous Budget Amendment 013 . . . . . . . . . . . . .
I. ESSX Telephone Service . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
J. Authorization of Out -of State Travel - NATOA Training
Conference . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
EMPLOYEE SUGGESTION PROGRAM RECOGNITION/CASH BONUS PLAN APPROVED . . . .
PRELIMINARY BUDGET REVIEW . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
5
5
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
13
14
15
17
HOBART/GIFFORD WASTEWATER INTERCONNECT EFFLUENT TRANSMISSION-MASTELLER,
MOLER, AND REED, INC.; BROWN AND CALDWELL; CARTER ASSOCIATES,
INC. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17
SOUTH REGIONAL EFFLUENT REUSE SYSTEM - FINAL PAY REQUEST - PRIME
CONSTRUCTION GROUP, INC. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
SEBASTIAN INLET TAX DISTRICT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
TREASURE COAST PRIVATE INDUSTRY COUNCIL - TREASURE COAST JOB TRAINING
CONSORTIUM . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
PRELIMINARY BUDGET REVIEW . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
COMMENTS RE CRITICISM OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR'S LAAC
RECOMMENDATIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
19
20
22
24
38
-- Tuesday, February 13, 1996
The Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County,
Florida, met in Regular Session at the County Commission Chambers,
1840 25th Street, Vero Beach, Florida, on Tuesday, February 13,
1996, at 9:00 a.m. Present were Fran B. Adams, Chairman; Carolyn
K. Eggert, Vice Chairman; Richard N. Bird; Kenneth R. Macht; and
John W. Tippin. Also present were James E. Chandler, County
Administrator; Charles P. Vitunac, County Attorney; and Patricia
Ridgely, Deputy Clerk.
The Chairman called the meeting to order, and Commissioner
Tippin led the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag.
ADDITIONS TO THE AGENDATMERGENCY ITEMS
Chairman Adams requested the addition of the Sebastian Inlet
Taxing District. (13.A.)
County Attorney Vitunac requested the addition to the Consent
Agenda of National Association of Telecommunication Officers and
Advisors Conference Attendance. (7.J.)
Commissioner Bird requested the addition of revised agreements
for the Treasure Coast Private Industry Council. (13.C.)
Later in the meeting, Commissioner Macht requested the
addition of comments reported recently in the newspaper criticizing
Community Development Director Bob Keating's LAAC recommendations.
(13.D.)
ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by
Commissioner Bird, the Board unanimously approved
the above additions to the agenda.
PROCLAMATION HONORING BARNETTE E. GREENE, TR.
ELECTION TO FLORIDA AGRICULTURAL HALL, OF FAME
Chairman Adams presented the following proclamation to Mr.
Barney Greene.
1
February 13, 1996 BOOK 97 PAr;E 26
BOOK 97 PArE 263
PROCLAMATION
WHEREAS, it has been traditional in this Country to establish
Halla of Fame to honor greatness in certain endeavors; and
WHEREAS, in keeping with this tradition there has been
established "THE FLORIDA AGRICULTURAL HALL OF FAME" to
honor those who have contributed so much to this most important
Florida industry; and
WHEREAS, Indian River County has been honored by having
one of these giants of the Florida agricultural industry live and
work in Indian River County,
NOW, THEREFORE, be it Proclaimed by the Board of County
Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida that Barnette
"Barney" E. Greene, Jr. who first started in 1947 with the
American Fruit Growers and then went on to Edsall Groves and then
Into business for himself and is now in 1998 one of five inductess
into The Florida Agricultural Hall of Fame is recognized and
thanked by the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River
County and the citizens of Indian River County for his
accomplishments which have benefited many over the years.
APPROVED and ADOPTED on this _u day of February, 1998.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
Fran B. Adams
Chairman
Mr. Greene expressed his thanks to the Board.
APPROVAL OF MINU'T'ES
The Chairman asked if there were any additions or corrections
to the Minutes of the Regular Meeting of January 23, 1996.
Commissioner Eggert requested page 29 of the minutes be
corrected to reflect her remarks (in the middle of the page) to
read:
Commissioner Eggert understood the effect of
the resolution, but was concerned that it
might be misunderstood by the public because
of the wording of the headline in the
newspaper as compared to the wording in the
body of the deeidnent article.
2
February 13, 1996
ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by
Commissioner Bird, the Board unanimously approved
the minutes of January 23, 1996, as corrected.
CONSENT AGENaA
Chairman Adams requested the removal of Item 7.I. for
discussion.
A. Report
Received & placed on file in the Office of the Clerk to the
Board:
• Indian River County Memorial Hospital Schedule of
Regular Meetings for 1996
• Indian River County Memorial Hospital, Inc. and
Subsidiaries- Consolidated Financial Statements,
September 30, 1995 and 1994
• Report of Convictions, January 1996
B. Sandridge Golf Club - Golf Cart Path
Release of Retainage - Timothy Rose Contracting, Inc.
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of February 1, 1996:
DATE: February 1, 1996
TO: Honorable Members of the Board of County Commissioners
MWECT: GOLF CART PATH RELEASE OF
FROM: Bob Komarinetz, Director
On September 12, 1995 the Board of County Commissioners approved
the award of- contract to Timothy Rose Contracting, Inc. to
construct concrete golf cart paths at the Sandridge Golf Club. The
contract was for specific work and not to exceed $140,000.00.
On November 1, 1995 the Board of County Commissioners approved
change order #1 to perform additional work to increase contract by
$90,000.00 making the overall contract $230,000.00.
The work has been completed according to specifications and the
total cost owed to contractor is $201,474.00. Contractor has been
paid $181,326.60 to date.
RECOMHBNDATION
Staff recommends the Board of County Commissioners approve release
of retainage to Timothy Rose Contracting, Inc. for $20,147.40 per
attached agreement.
FUNDS AVAILABLE - 418-221-572-066.39
3 800K 97 FADE 26
February 13, 1996
BOOK
ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by
Commissioner Bird, the Board unanimously approved
release of retainage to Timothy Rose Contracting,
Inc. for $20,147.40, as recommended in the
memorandum.
97 pnr-265
C. GHA Harbor Ltd. - Harbor Links (Phase M,, Grand Harbor Plat 17
Planned Development (PD) Final Plat Approval
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of February 6, 1996:
TO: James E. Chandler
County Administrator
DI ON HEAD CONCURRENCE:
1�el-Z
Obert M. Keating, AICA
Community Developlment! rector
THROUGH: Stan Boling, AICP
Planning Director
FROM: Eric Blad��
Staff Planner, Current Development
DATE: February 6, 1996
SUBJECT: GHA Harbor Ltd. Is Request for Planned Development (PD)
Final Plat Approval for Harbor Links, Grand Harbor Plat
17 (a.k.a. Harbor Links Phase II)
It is requested that the data herein presented be given formal
consideration by the Board of County Commissioners at its regular
meeting of February 13, 1996.
DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS:
Harbor Links, Grand Harbor Plat 17 is a replat of a portion of
Harbor Village Phase I. The parcel being replatted is a single
1.32 acre parcel located on the south end of the Harbor Village
area. The requested final plat will create 8 single family lots
out of the existing 1.32 acre parcel.
On November 16, 1995, the Planning and Zoning Commission granted
preliminary plat approval for Harbor Links Phase II, now known as
Harbor Links, Grand Harbor Plat 17. All infrastructure
improvements associated with the requested final plat were
completed in 1993 with the platting of Harbor Village Phase I. The
developer is now requesting final plat approval to replat a portion
of Harbor Village Phase I, and has submitted --a final plat in
conformance with the approved preliminary plat-.-
ANALYSIS:
lat.
ANALYSIS:
All required improvements necessary to provide access and services
to the lots have been constructed, and a certificate of completion
has been issued by the Public Works Department. Required
improvements necessary to service the individual lotsare
controlleui
via the overall Grand Harbor PRD. With the exception of
4
February 13, 1996
utilities, which will be dedicated to the public, all other
required improvements in the development will be private. Since
the provisions of required internal improvements for individual
buildings will be controlled through the PD site plan process, and
since the required improvements necessary to provide service to
Harbor Links Phase II have been constructed, the developer has
satisfied all development requirements for final plat approval.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners grant final
plat approval for Harbor Links, Grand Harbor Plat 17.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by
Commissioner Bird, the Board unanimously granted
final plat approval for Harbor Links, Grand Harbor
Plat 17, as recommended in the memorandum.
D. Temporary Water Service Agreement - Juanita Harris
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of January 22, 1996:
DATE: JANUARY 22, 1996
TO: JAMES E. CHANDLER
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
FROM: TERRANCE G. PINTO
DIRECTOR OF UTILITY SERVICES
PREPARED JAMES D. CHASTA
AND MANAGER OF ASSE PROJECTS
STAFFED BY: DEPARTMENT OF UTILITY SERVICES
SUBJECT: TEMPORARY WATER SERVICE AGREEMENT
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY AND
JUANITA HARRIS
BACKGROUND
Juanita Harris has requested that temporary service be installed
from the water line on 10th Street to service her property on 1005
48th Terrace, Vero Beach, Florida 32960 prior to'the installation
of a water main on 48th Terrace.
ANALYSIS
The Agreement states that the Indian River County Department of
Utility Services shall provide temporary water service to Juanita
Harris until such time that a water line may be constructed on 48th
Terrace by assessment. She agrees to pay all fees required to make
this connection. She further agrees to participate in the
assessment and to reconnect to this water line as required by the
Indian River County Department of Utility Services.
The Department of Utility Services recommends that the Board of
County Commissioners approve the attached Agreement with Juanita
Harris on the Consent Agenda.
5
February 13, 1996 BOOK 97 PnE 266
BOOK 97 PACE 267
ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by
Commissioner Bird, the Board unanimously approved
the temporary water service agreement with Juanita
Harris, as recommended in the memorandum.
AGREEMENT IS ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF
THE CLERK TO THE BOARD AND RECORDED
IN THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
E. Temporary Water Service Agreement - Christopher P. Schlitt and
Charlene W. Schlitt
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of January 22, 1996:
TO: JAMES E. CHANDLER DATE: JANUARY 22
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR , 1996
FROM: TERRANCE G. PINTO
DIRECTOR O UTILITY SERVICES
PREPARED WILLIAM F. MCCA
AND CAPITAL S ENGINEER
STAFFED BY: DE AR F UTILITY SERVICES
SUBJECT: TEMPORARY WATER SERVICE AGREEMENT
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY AND
CHRISTOPHER P. SCHLITT AND CHARLENE W. SCHLITT
BACKGROUND
Christopher P. Schlitt and Charlene W. Schlitt have requested that
temporary service be installed from the water line on 8th Street to
service their properties on 2065 DeRosa Road and 2060 DeRosa Road,
Vero Beach, Florida 32960 prior to the installation of a water main
on DeRosa Road.
ANALYSIS
The Agreement states that the Indian River County Department of
Utility Services shall provide temporary water service to Mr. and
Mrs. Schlitt until such time that a water line may be constructed
on DeRosa Road by assessment. They agree to pay all fees required
to make this connection. They further agree to participate in the
assessment and to reconnect to this water line as required by the
Indian River County Department of Utility Services.
The Department of Utility Services recommends that the Board of
County Commissioners approve the attached Agreement with Mr. and
Mrs. Schlitt on the Consent Agenda.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by
Commissioner Bird, the Board unanimously approved
the temporary water service agreement with
Christopher P. Schlitt and Charlene W. Schlitt, as
recommended in the memorandum.
AGREEMENT IS ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE
CLERK TO THE BOARD AND RECORDED
IN THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
0
February 13, 1996 -
F. Temporary Water Service Agreement - Vick & Rachelle Campbell
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of January 22, 1996:
DATE: __ JANUARY 22, 1996
TO: JAMES E. CHANDLER
COUNTY ADMINISTRA
FROM:
TERRANCE G. PINTO
DIRECTOR OF TILI SERVICES
PREPARED
WILLIAM F cCAIN
AND
CAPIT TS ENGINEER
STAFFED BY:
DE ERVICES
SUBJECT:
TEMPORARY WATER SERVICE AGREEMENT
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY AND
VICK AND RA HELLE CAMPBELL
BACKGROUND
Vick and Rachelle Campbell have requested that temporary service be
installed from the water line on 8th Street to service their
property on 2050 DeRosa Road, Vero Beach, Florida 32960 prior to
the installation of a water main on DeRosa Road.
ANALYSIS
The Agreement states that the Indian River County Department of
Utility Services shall provide temporary water service to Mr. and
Mrs. Campbell until such time that a water line may be constructed
on DeRosa Road by assessment. They agree to pay all fees required
to make this connection. They further agree to participate in the
assessment and to reconnect to this water line as required by the
Indian River County Department of Utility Services.
RECOMMENDATION
The Department of Utility Services recommends that the Board of
County Commissioners approve the attached Agreement with Mr. and
Mrs. Campbell on the Consent Agenda.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by
Commissioner Bird, the Board unanimously approved
the temporary water service agreement with Vick and
Rachelle Campbell, as recommended in the memorandum.
AGREEMENT IS ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE
CLERK TO THE BOARD AND IS RECORDED
IN -THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
7
February 13, 1996
Bou 9 7 PA f 8
BOOK 97 PnE 269
G. Temporary Water Service Agreement - Frank T. Schlitt, Sr.
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of January 22, 1996:
DATE: JANUARY. 22, 1996
TO: JAMES E. CHANDLER
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
FROM: TERRANCE G. PINTO
DIRECTOR OF UTILITY SERVICES
PREPARED WILLIAM . MCCAIN
AND CAP S ENGINEER
STAFFED BY: D OF UTILITY SERVICES
SUBJECT: TEMPORARY WATER SERVICE AGREEMENT
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY AND
FRANK J. SCHLITT, SR.,
BACKGROUND
Frank J. Schlitt, Sr. has requested that temporary service be
installed from the water line on 8th Street to service his property
on 2040 DeRosa Road, Vero Beach, Florida 32960 prior to the
installation of a water main on DeRosa Road.
ANALYSIS
- The Agreement states that the Indian River County Department of
Utility Services shall provide temporary water service to Mr. Frank
J. Schlitt, Sr. until such time that a water line may be
constructed on DeRosa Road by assessment. He agrees to pay all
fees required to make this connection. He further agrees to
participate in the assessment and to reconnect to this water line
as required by the Indian River County Department of Utility
Services.
RECOMMENDATION
The Department of Utility Services recommends that the Board of
County Commissioners approve the attached Agreement with Mr. Frank
J. Schlitt, Sr. on the Consent Agenda.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by
Commissioner Bird, the Board unanimously approved
the temporary water service agreement with Frank J.
Schlitt, Sr., as recommended in the memorandum.
AGREEMENT IS ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF
THE CLERK TO THE BOARD AND IS RECORDED
IN THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
8
February 13, 1996 -
H. Miscellaneous Budget Amendment 013
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of February 7, 1996:
TO: Members of the Board
of County Commissioners
DATE: February 7, 1996
SUBJECT: MISCELLANEOUS BUDGET AMENDMENT 013
CONSENT AGENDA
FROM: Joseph A. Baird
OMB Director
DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS
The attached budget amendment is to appropriate funding for the following:
1. This entry allocates additional funds received from the Library State Aid Grant and
donations received by the Main Library and the North County Library.
2. At their January 23, 1996 meeting, the Board of County Commissioners approved to
fund the New Horizons In House Jail Substance Abuse and Aftercare Program from
February 1996 to October 1996 for $23,340. Sheriff Wheeler indicated, by letter, that
there was $5,525 available to be transferred from their Civil Fees account to the
County's Fines and Forfeiture Fund. A donor will contribute $5,000 leaving $12,815
to be funded by the General Fund Contingency. This entry appropriates the funding.
3. The Sheriff s Office held a Surplus Sale on October 21, 1995. The proceeds from the
sale total $14,106 (Furniture & Equipmerit $2,106 and Automobiles $12,000). They
wish to purchase replacement equipment with the proceeds. This entry allocates the
funding.
4. This entry adjusts the Optional Sales Tax fund to properly reflect the budget.
Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners approve the attached budget amendment.
TO: Members of the Board
of County Commissioners
FROM: Joseph A. B
OMB Director's
BUDGET AMENDMENT: 013
DATE: February 7. 1996
Entry
Number
Funds/Department/Account Name
Account Number
Increase
Decrease
1;
REVENUE
General Fund/State Aid Library Grant
001-000-334710.00
$35,207
$0
General Fund/Main Library/Donations-Books
001-000-366-103.00
$568
$0
General Fuad/Main Library/Donations-Other
001-000-366-095.00
$2,682
$0
General Fund/North County Library/
Donations -Book
001-000-366-100.00
$2,934
$0
General Fund/North County Library/
Donations -Other
001-000-366-097.00
$336
$0
9
February 13, 1996
BOOK 97 FAE Z/! 0
BOOK 97 PAGE 271
Entry.
Number
Funds/Departrnent/Account Name
Account Number
Increase
Decrease
EXPENSE
General Fund/Law IJbrary/Books
001-119-516-035.45
$3,000
$0
General Fund/North County la'brary/
Office Furniture and Equipment
001-112-571-066.41
$4,500
$0
General Fund/North County Library/Books
001-112-571-035.45
$7,770
$0
General Fund/Mam la'brary/
Office Furniture and Equipment
001-109-571-066.41
$7,000
$0
General Fund/Main Library/Books
001-109-571-035.45
$19,457
2.
REVENUE
General Fund/Sheriff
0014)00-341-052.00
$5,525
.$0
General Fund/Other Contributions
001-O0-366-090.00
$5,000
$0
EXPENSE
General Fund/Reserve for Contingency
001-199-581-099.91
$0
$12,815
General Fund/New Horizon's Counseling Grant
001-110-562-088.70
$23,340
$0
3.
REVENUE
General Fund/Sheriff
001-000-341-052.00
$14,106
EXPENSE
General Fund/Sheriff-Law Enforcement
001-600-586-099.04
$14,106
4.
REVENUE
Optional Sales Tax/Cash Forward
3154X)0-389-040.00
$0
$2,115,000
EXPENSE
Optional Sales Tax/Library/EDP Equipment
315-109-571-066.47
$7,459
$0
Optional Sales Tax/Administration Building/
Other Buildings
315-130-519-066.29
$0
$2,845
Optional Sales Tax/EMS/
Construction in Progress
315-208-525-066.51
$0
$240,000
Optional Sales Tax/Parks/ Land
315-210-572-066.11
$0
$2,090,000
Optional Sales Tax/Parks/Other Improvement
315-210-572-066.39
$269,403
$0
Optional Sales Tax/Parks/
Construction in Progress
315-210-572-066.51
$20,597
$0
Optional Sales Tax/Road & Bridge/ROW
315-214-541-066.12
$0
$64,068
Optional Sales Tar/Road & Bridge/
Road and Bridges
315-214-541-066.31
$374,360
$0
Optional Sales Tax/Road& Bridge/Sidewalks
315-214-541-066.32
$873
$0
Optional Sales Tax/Courthouse/
Construction in Progress
--
315-909-516-066.51
$0
$40,000
Optional Sales Tax/
Reserve For Contingencies
315-909-581-099.91
$0
$39,095
Optional Sales Tax/Cash Forward
315-199-586-099.92
$0
$311,684
10
February 13, 1996
ON MOTION by Commissioner
Commissioner Bird, the Board
budget amendment 013, as
memorandum.
I. ESSX Telephone Service
Eggert, SECONDED by
unanimously approved
recommended in the
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of February 6, 1996:
DATE: FEBRUARY 6, 1996
TO: HONORABLE BOARD OF COUNTY CONMSSIONERS
THRU: JAMES E. CHANDLER
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
FROM: H.T. "SONNY" DEAN, DIRECTOR
DEPARTMENT OF GENERALS ES
SUBJECT: ESSX TELEPHONE SERVICE
BACKGROUND:
In January the Board approved a contract with Bell South to furnish ESSX telephone service to our
various locations. This contract was for loops (extensions) within a two and one half mile radius of
their Central Office. Since that time, staff has been negotiating with Bell South for a rate to cover
loops outside the two and one half miles, up to seven miles, which would cover the remainder of our
extensions.
The results of this effort has produced the same contract price for the longer loops as is being charged
for the shorter distances. This is quite a savings for the County.
ANALYSIS:
Since the above action has caused a slight change in the language of the contract signed in January,
Bell South has requested we execute two new contracts. One to cover the shorter distance and
another to cover the longer distance.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends approval of the two contracts as submitted and requests authorization for the
Board Chairman to execute said documents.
In response to Chairman Adams' request, General Services
Director Sonny Dean explained that the ESSX Telephone System is
a central switch maintained in the local telephone company's
office. There are loops or extensions off that switch which extend
out to various locations in the county up to 7 miles. The
11
February 13, 1996
BOOK 97 972
BOOK 97 PAGE M
telephone company has two cut-off points, the 5 -mile and the 7 -
mile, or a 2-1/2 and a 7 -mile radius and a price had to be
negotiated for these extensions. We are paying $4.50 for all of it
which he felt was a very good deal with the telephone company.
Chairman Adams commented that the contract on page 49 in the
back-up actually reads 5 miles, 'so we need to make sure the
contract says 7 miles.
Director Dean advised that there are actually two contracts.
County Attorney Vitunac advised that there are two very
similar looking contracts and perhaps only one of them had been
copied for the backup.
Director Dean advised that we're signing one contract for up -
to -5 miles and then the other for up -to -7 miles.
Commissioner Eggert wondered why there were two separate
contracts, and Director Dean responded that it was because there
were two different rates. The up -to -5 mile rate had to be
negotiated first; then they had to negotiate the up -to -7 mile rate.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by
Commissioner Bird, the Board unanimously approved
the two ESSX Telephone Service contracts, as
recommended by staff.
AGREEMENTS ARE ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF
THE CLERK TO THE BOAARD AND ARE RECORDED IN THE
PUBLIC RECORDS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
T. Authorization of Out -of State Travel - NATOA Training Conference
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of February 8, 1996:
TO: Hoard of County Commissioners
FROM: Charles P. Vitunac, County Attorney
DATE: February 8, 1996
RE: National Association of Telecommunication
Officers and Advisors - Training Seminar
On February 7, 1996, President Clinton signed into law the new
telecommunication bill which radically changes the relationship of local
government franchising authorities and the cable industry.
The National Association of Telecommunication officers and Advisors is
holding a training session on March 7 and 8, 1996, in Washington, D.C., and a
recent meeting with the County cable coordinating group, Commissioner Macht
felt that it was advisable to have representation at the meeting; therefore,
I am requesting permission for Commissioner Macht and me to attend. The cost
for this travel is included in our office budget.
Requested Action: Permission for Commissioner Macht and County Attorney
vituaac to attend NATOA training seminar.
12
February 13, 1996
� r ens
ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by
Commissioner Bird, the Board unanimously authorized
out-of-state travel for Commissioner Macht and
County Attorney Vitunac to attend the NATOA training
seminar i -n- Washington, D.C., on March 7 & 8, as
requested.
EMPLOYEE SUGGESTION PROGRAM
RECOGNITION/CASH BONUS PLAN APPROVED
Administrator Chandler reviewed a Memorandum of February 7,
1996:
TO: Board of County Commissioners
DATE: February 7, 1996
SUBJECT: Suggestion Program
FROM: James E. Chandler X -501(f .
County Administrator
To implement the employee suggestion program it would be my recommendation that
the program be oriented to quarterly and annual recognition. Each quarter three employees who
have submitted suggestions considered to have the most potential would be recognized by the
Board and receive a cash bonus. Once a year, additional recognition and cash bonus would be
extended to the three employees whose suggestions are considered to be best from all the top 3
quarterly suggestions. The quarterly cash bonus would be an equal amount to each, perhaps
$200 each The annual could be $1,000, $750, and $500 for the top 3. Obviously, there could
be any number of variations to this type program in the form of the recognition and bonus
amounts considered appropriate.
As proposed, department and division heads would not be eligible. The committee to
consider the suggestions would be the Board Chairman, County Administrator, Budget Director,
and others as appropriate.
SUGGESTION
DEPT.
NAME
Binding Cases/Clips
Clerk
Carol Fahey
County Credit Card
Bldg.
Pete McLeod
Supervisor Evaluation
Utilities
Richard Blanken
Hot Water to Kitchen
Clerk
Pat Ridgely
Overtime
Utilities
David Krintz
Business Cards
Public Works
Don Finney
Computer Paper/Sam's
"
Fleet Uniformity
Tint on Large Windows
"
Remove Elec. Appliances
"
Car Seat Hot Line
Public Works
Rebecca Thorne
Palm Tree Trimming
Bldg. Dept.
Pete McLeod
13
February 13, 1996
BOOK
97 F},c-74
Recycling Bins
Security Personnel Crthse.
Computer Repair Uniformity
Inhouse Computer Guru
Software License
Magazine Quantities
Abandoned Cable Removal
Prisoners Mow Fire Dept.
Energy Saving Ideas
Emergency Ser.
Bldg.
Budget
K
K
K
K
Fire Dept.
BOOK
Diane Albin
Lynn Williams
Kim Massung
»
»
»
Kent Middleton
Anonymous
97 PAjE 275
Chairman Adams briefly reviewed the above list of suggestions
which had been distributed. She thought perhaps greater incentives
should be offered, such as $700, $500, and $300 quarterly, with
annual amounts of $2,000, $1,500, and $1,000.
Commissioner Eggert received assurances that a quarterly award
would not be given if there was no reason for it.
Commissioner Macht wanted the suggestions screened against the
backdrop of on-going programs. He noted three or four suggestions
overlapped or were already existing.
Commissioner Bird felt every employee who submitted a good
suggestion should be recognized for their efforts, perhaps at a
meeting, whether or not their suggestion was an award winner.
Administrator Chandler thought that something could be done
like that for all those who made suggestions.
Chairman Adams agreed that all employees who made suggestions
need to be recognized. She advised that the suggestions would be
acknowledged with a letter of thanks. Some suggestions, she said,
may take several months to analyze.
Commissioner Bird felt the amounts in the memo were right for
the first year to see how it works. He pointed out that if a
suggestion comes in the last quarter, there would not be much time
to implement the suggestion and determine the cost savings.
Commissioner Tippin thought the amounts suggested by the
County Administrator were sufficient.
Commissioner Eggert agreed all employees' suggestions should
be recognized and she was comfortable with the amounts as suggested
by the County Administrator. She went on to say that while
something might be a wonderful idea, there are other factors to
consider in addition to cost.
Administrator Chandler advised that each _of the suggestions
is presently being analyzed for potential cost -savings and being
screened in light of Commissioner Macht's earlier comment.
Commissioner Macht felt that at the very least it has opened
a very good line of communication with the employees, which
14
February 13, 1996
apparently was badly needed. He felt suggestions could encompass
more than cost -savings; they could be procedural or personnel
policy changes.
ON MOTION ---by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by
Commissioner Bird, the Board unanimously approved
the top 3 quarterly bonus awards of $200 each and
the top 3 annual bonus awards of $1,000, $750, and
$500, as outlined in the memorandum.
The Chairman requested the program be reviewed at the
beginning of 1997.
_ -- PRELIMINARY BUDGET REVIEW
(CLERK'S NOTE: THE BOARD AGREED TO ADDRESS THIS MATTER AT THE
END OF THE MEETING.)
HOBART/GIFFORD WASTEWATER INTERCONNECT EFFLUENT
TRANSMISSION - MASTELLER. MOLER, AND REED, INC.;
BROWN AND CALDWELL• CARTER ASSOCIATES9 INC.
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of January 31, 1996:
DATE: JANUARY 31, 1996
TO: JAMES E. CHANDLER
COUNTY ADMINIST*ATOR
FROM: TERRANCE G. PINT
DIRECTOR OF UTI SERVICES
PREPARED _ WI MCCAIN
AND STAFFED P OJECTS ENGINEER
BY: DEP OF IIT SERVICES
SUBJECT: HOBART/GIFFORD WASTEWATER INTERCONNECT EFFLUENT
TRANSMISSION
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY PROJECT NO. -US -95 -24 -DC
On July 18, 1995 the .Board of County Commissioners approved an
update to the Utilities Master Plan with the engineering firm of
Brown and Caldwell. This update was necessitated by the
acquisition of the Sebastian Utilities. In an effort to maximize
wastewater treatment capabilities/capacities, we instructed our
Master Planners to review the connection of the North and Central
15
February 13, 1996
BOOK 97 rvG 276
BOOK 97 PAGE 277
Regional Wastewater Treatment Plants. By constructing this
interconnect, we can delay the cost of expanding the North Regional
Plant through the year 2001±. - To accomplish this, for a portion of
the force main route, we propose to utilize an existing 8 -inch
effluent line, which currently runs from the North Regional Plant
to Sandridge Golf Course. The 8 -inch effluent line is due to be
upsized to a 12 -inch effluent line per the Master Plan, and
construction of the new 12 -inch effluent line will be included as
part of this project. At the same time, we must install a new line
from the canal right-of-way to the effluent receiving pond at
Sandridge as we have been utilizing an existing irrigation line,
which the golf course now needs to have solely dedicated to their
irrigation pumping needs. From the Sandridge Golf Course south, we
will construct a new 8 -inch wastewater force main, which will
connect to an existing main at the Hawk's Nest Golf Course for
conveyance of wastewater to the Central Regional Plant. For
details of the Brown and Caldwell analysis, please see the attached
letter of recommendation. The engineer for this project will be
Carter Associates, Inc., as per our engineering selection and
contract rotational procedures. (For details of the proposed
contract, please see attached.)
ANALYSIS
The estimated project construction cost is $685,500.00. The
negotiated proposed engineering costs with Carter are as follows:
1) Basic design services $43,000.00
2) Inspection 19,000.-00
3) Survey 11,135.00
4) Soils 1,580.00
5) Public meetings, etc. for Indian River 4.500.00
Farms
Total $79,215.00
Contingency* 7,500.00
* To be authorized by the Utilities Director if required.
The majority of the route of this project is within the Indian
River Farms rights-of-way, and as a result, the District has placed
some additional requirements on the project as follows:
1. The County/Engineer must hold a public meeting for all _-
property owners along the route (approximately 19 parcels). -
(See item 5 under engineering costs for Carter.)
2. The County must provide to the District a "monumented" as -
built survey along the District's right-of-way of all existing
utilities prior to the District issuing a construction permit.
The cost of the "monumented" survey is in excess of $10,000.00, and
per our survey contracts, any surveying services over $10,000.00
must be negotiated with our No. 1 selected surveyor, Masteller,
Molar and Reed, Inc. The staff has negotiated a cost of the
monumented as -built at $10,825.00. Please see the proposed
contract with Masteller, Molar and Reed, which is attached.
RE902-MMENDATION
The staff of the Department of Utility Services recommends that the
Board of County Commissioners approve this project and associated
engineering and survey contracts as presented.
16
February 13, 1996
ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by
Commissioner Bird, the Board unanimously approved
the project and contracts with Brown and Caldwell,
Carter Associates, Inc., and Masteller, Moler, and
Reed, Inc..., as recommended and outlined in the
memorandum.
PROPOSAL AND ENGINEERING WORK AUTHORIZATION
ARE ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
SOUTH REGIONAL EFFLUENT REUSE SYSTEM - FINAL PAY
REQUEST - PRIME CONSTRUCTION GROUP, INC.
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of January 16, 1996:
DATE: JANUARY 16, 1996
TO: JAMES E. CHANDLER
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
FROM: TERRANCE G. PINT
DIRECTOR OF UTILT SERVICES
PREPARED WILLIAM MCCAIN
AND STAFFED CAPIT P ER
BY: DEPAR F UTILITY SERVICES
SUBJECT: SOUTH REGIONAL EFFLUENT REUSE SYSTEM
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY PROJECT NO. IIS -94 -02 -DS
FINAL PAY REQUEST -_
BACKGROUND AND ANALYSIS
On April 4, 1995 the Indian River County Board of County
Commissioners approved the award of the above -referenced project to
Prime Construction Group, Inc. (See attached agenda item and
minutes.) The project is complete and was accepted by the County
on January 5, 1996. We are now prepared to make final payment to
the contractor in the amount of $48,141.09. (See attached final
pay request.)
RECON—MmATION
The staff of the Department of Utility Services recommends that the
Board of County Commissioners approve the final pay request for
this project as submitted.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by
Commissioner Bird, the Board unanimously approved
the final pay request of Prime Construction Group
for the project as submitted, as recommended in the
memorandum.
FINAL PAY REQUEST IS ON FILE IN THE
OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
17
February 13, 1996
�o�x 97 PvGt-278
BOOK 97 PAGE 079
SEBASTIAN INLET TAX DISTRICT
Chairman Adams advised that at the last Beach & Shore
Preservation Advisory Committee meeting, there was a -motion to look
into the possibilities of legal recourse and the ramifications of
either joining with current lawsuits against the Sebastian Inlet
Tax District (SITD) or initiating our own. She was bringing the
matter to the Board's attention to advise that she had met last
Tuesday with the District's administrator, Ray LaRoux; their legal
counsel, Cliff McClelland; and Randy Mosby, one of the District's
Commissioners, in County Attorney Vitunac's office, to discuss
continued concern over the loss of sand from our public beaches.
She called on County Attorney Vitunac for additional information.
County Attorney Vitunac reported that two cases are now
pending, one is a Department of Administrative Hearings (DOAH) and
the other is an inverse condemnation action brought by the property
owners. He advised that SITD had provided him with a large volume
of information, and their attorney had recommended that we proceed
slowly and not sue them yet. The attorney for the property owners
suggested that the County negotiate with the SITD on the sand
pumping and meet with him before filing suit.
County Attorney Vitunac continued that there will be a SITD
meeting February 15th and Chairman Adams' request for cooperation
between the District and the County to put sand on our beaches will
be on the agenda. Coastal Engineer Don Donaldson also attended the
meeting with the SITD representatives and the County put all its
cards on the table. The County was quite honest in saying that,
despite the technicalities of these lawsuits which.the District
may or may not win, we would like to do what is good for the
taxpayers and beach property owners south of Sebastian Inlet.
Everyone was candid and it was clear that, at least at one time in
the past, the inlet had caused the loss of sand. It was uncertain
whether the District could win because of the statute of
limitations or because of a jurisdictional problem. His office has
not looked into the vast filings for the last 5 years, nor have
they been authorized by the Board to do so.
County Attorney Vitunac went on to say that now the plane has
been raised to a higher level to do what is good for the people and
taxpayers of our community. At the meeting, they asked for a. -good
faith expression that the SITD Board would go on -record at its next
meeting to do something reasonable to put sand on the beaches, in
order to avoid wasting money, which is the usual result when public
agencies sue each other. Chairman Adams was quite adamant that we
would recommend pursuing legal remedies, if we had to, if the
18
February 13, 1996
District continued to stonewall our Commission's reasonable
request. At the end of the meeting, the District members agreed to
present this matter to their Board and recommend some type of joint
beach renourishment plan wherein the County would provide certain
resources and thie-District would provide the sand.
Commissioner Adams indicated her primary concern was with our
public beaches: Golden Sands, Treasure Shores, and Wabasso, in
particular. She wanted some sort of a partnership with the SITD.
While they indicated the sand would be trucked, rather than pumped,
she was concerned solely with the fact that our dunes are
disappearing at an incredible rate and some reinforcement needs to
be done. Turtle nesting begins in May and we are again running on
a time line.
Chairman Adams advised that Mr. LaRoux has now promised that
they would try to determine an upland source for sand. On Friday,
he indicated that he would like to get a permit for it first.
Chairman Adams thought, however, that he first needed to obtain a
consensus from the District to put sand on our south County park
beaches. She also hoped to develop a partnership with some
property owners along there, particularly Sea Oaks, Disney, and
Summerplace, who have very serious problems. First, however, a
commitment from the SITD is necessary and, as it moves forward, it
will be brought back to the agenda.
Commissioner Eggert wanted not only to hold the line and
continue with this negotiation, but also to keep a firm time line.
If we have not heard from them and if they are not working
aggressively toward trucking that sand, then she wished to move
ahead.
In response to Commissioner Bird's question, County Attorney
Vitunac's recollection of the SITD boundaries indicated that most
of the property lies in Brevard County. The District was set up in
the 1920's with properties that, at that time, were thought would
be affected by the inlet.
Commissioner Bird pointed out that therein lies the problem.
Brevard County is on the upstream side of the inlet and sand is
building up on their beaches. The elected officials are looking
out for the constituents in their taxing district; unfortunately,
a minority of those properties are in Indian River County.
Chairman Adams felt that Mr. Mosby is beginning to understand
Indian River county's predicament. She agreed we must remember
that they are elected to represent the interests of the inlet, and
not necessarily to represent Indian River County's interest.
19
February 13, 1996
BOOK 97 PAF 990
KOOK 97 P.�1.281
Relevant to the lawsuit, Commissioner Macht asked if the case
could be tried on the basis that the loss of sand was not an
isolated incident, but on-going, and that at least two studies
indicated that 70% of the littoral drift sand is either swept out
to sea or into the inlet, thus starving our beaches.
County Attorney Vitunac pointed out that the District's
position is that, according to the Supreme Court case which they
furnished him, jurisdiction is no longer in Circuit Court for that
type of suit.
Commissioner Macht pointed out that if the beaches are
replenished, you have, in effect, created a sacrificial beach with
a sacrificial source of sand that would, sooner or later, benefit
the entire coast. He indicated his agreement to move forward
toward agreement with the SITD to move sand to the south inlet
beaches.
Chairman Adams indicated that the concern, at this point, was
to try to restore the dune line which is being lost. Then, at some
future time, they would be able to move toward some beach
stabilization program.
Commissioner Tippin complimented Chairman Adams for a big
first step and indicated his readiness to have things move forward
as quickly as possible.
There was CONSENSUS to move ahead to negotiate with the
Sebastian Inlet Taxing District and pursue legal remedies, if
necessary.
TREASURE COAST PRIVATE INDUSTRY COUNCIL
TREASURE COAST TOB TRAE
NING CONSORTIUM
The Board reviewed a Letter of February 6, 1996, and a
Memorandum of February 8, 1996:
February 6, 1996
Commissioner Richard Bird
Indian River County Board of County Commissioners
PIC 1840 25th St., -Suite N 158
( ( Vero Beach, Florida 32960
i
D er Bird:
T1zEa►s[1RE CoasT
PRIVATE Attached please find the revised agreements to be approved for signature
INDUSTRY at our next Treasure Coast Job Training Consortium meeting. If you
would like for me or one of my staff to be at the Commission meeting
COUNCIL when they are reviewed in order to answer any questions or provide
background information, call Sylvia with the time and place and we will
be happy to accommodate.
February 13, 1996
� � a
I.A. "Mac" Mascioli
Chairman
Mike Gifford
vice Chairman
Carrol Frischkom
Treasurer
Karen Alley
Werner Bois
Richard D. Curtis
Rickey L. Farrell
Rick Ferretti
Christopher Fogal
Suzanne Hutcheson
Larry Lee, Jr.
Michael Lewis
Carl Miller. Jr.
John Miracola
Robert Moses
Sid Poe
J. Hal Roberts. Jr.
Darryl Rutz
Mike Tartaglio
Ken Vickers
E. Thelma Waters
Wilbur Williams
Be sure your calendar is marked for our next important meeting -
Monday, February 19th at 9:00 a.m
Ken Pruitt
Honorary Member TO:
Nan Rose Griggs
Executive Director FROM:
Bobbie Howard-davis
Assistant Director RE:
DATE:
Sincerely,
Nan Griggs,
Executive Director
"NATION'S'I PRIVATE INDUSTRY COUNCIL"
U.S. Deputment of Labor 1990 • National Alli o of Buda=1992
MEMORANDUM
Commissioner Richard Bird
.Nan Griggs
SDA Redesignation
February 8, 1996
3405 N.W.
Federal Hwy.
Suite 101 The Okeechobee County Commission met yesterday and decided to join
Jensen Beach' FI. the Treasure Coast Service Delivery Area for Workforce Development
34957-4439 and Cliff Betts will become a member of the Treasure Coast Job Training
4071692 -ISM Consortium.
ami46s-U"
4WI%2-0700 Attached are the revised Interlocal Agreements that are needed to include
Fa 4MI692-3711 Okeechobee County in our Service .
ppIEOA Delivery Area. Please be sure they
are reviewed at your next Commission meeting and that you have
approval to sign them at our Consortium meeting on the 19th.
Please copy me on the letter from your chair to the Governor expressing
Your Commission's agreement to the four (4) County Consortium.
Commissioner Bird advised that Okeechobee County has voted to
become part of the Treasure Coast Private Industry Council's Job
Training Consortium and it is now necessary to revise three of the
agreements that have existed for some time. The agreements are
basically the same, just add Okeechobee County. Two documents
require his signature and one requires Chairman Adams, signature.
He recommended the Board authorize execution of the agreements.
Commissioner Bird assured Commissioner Eggert that the
agreements would merely enlarge the council to include Okeechobee
County and would not diminish our representation.
Commissioner Bird pointed out that the PIC has been named the
#1 PIC in the United States twice in the last three or four years.
21
February 13, 1996
BOOK 97 - PA GF 282
BOOK 97 PAGE 283
He felt they continue to do a good job and, hopefully, it would
remain thus under the new structuring.
Commissioner Eggert asked if any Federal reorganization has
occurred yet.
Commissioner Bird responded that nothing definite has
happened, but it does look like there will be some changes.
Commissioner Macht thought the Federal changes would be based
on the block grant and that it would conform to community college
boundaries.
Chairman Adams thought this was a first step toward that
Federal jobs program. _
ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by
Commissioner Bird, the Board unanimously approved
the agreements as presented.
COPY OF PARTIALLY EXECUTED AGREEMENTS ARE ON FILE
-- IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
PRELIMINARY BUDGET REVIEW
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of February 7, 1996:
TO: James E. Chandler
County Administrato
DATE: February 7, 1996
SUBJECT: PRE1XMMARY BUDGET REVIM
FROM: Joseph A Bair _
OMB Director
Attached is information for a preliminary budget review. Initial indications are that in fiscal year
1996/97 we will not have as many negative issues facing us as we had in the past two years.
The presentation should not be lengthy; therefore, we may be able to have it at the end of the February
13, 1996 Board of County Commissioners meeting.
Administrator Chandler advised that the purpose today was to
give a general overview of the current status of this year's budget
and what is perceived for the next fiscal year. While it is very
early in the budget year and the next budget year's process, there
is one significant difference between last year and this year. A
number of obstacles that had to be addressed last year, such as
courthouse security and operational expenses, impact of Fair Labor
Standards Act, and needs in emergency services area, are not
present this year.
22
February 13, 1996
M M M
OMB Director Joe Baird gave the Board a quick overview of the
20—page document he had submitted for backup material,
concentrating on the pages shaded in the Table of Contents, pages
1, 2, 3, 17, 18, and 19.
BUDGET WORKSHOP
FEBRUARY 13,1996
TABLE OF CONTENTS
CountyFunds............................................................. zo
AdValorem Taxing Funds ...................................................
...................
TaxingFunds Descriptions .............................. ....................... .
General Fund Expenditures - Percentages of Total ................................. 4
General Fund Revenue - Percentages of Total .....................................
M.S.T.U. Expenditures - Percentages of Total ....................................
M.S.T.U. Revenue - Percentages of Total ........................................ 7
Transportation Fund - Fund 111-1995/96 Budget ................................. g
Emergency Service District - Fund 114 -1995/96 Budget ........................... 9
Indian River County Taxing District Summary .................................... 10
1995/96 Budget Ad Valorem Taxes ............................................ 11
Indian River County Tax Roll Changes .......................................... 12
Indian River County Village Rates by Taxing Auffim* ............................. 13
Solid Waste Disposal District -1995/96 Budget ...................... 14
............
Enterprise Funds and Internal Service Funds -1995/96 Budget ....................... 15
Other Funds -1995/96 Budget ................................................. 16
1996/97 Budget Expenditures ................................... . 07
1996/97 Budget Revenue....:.....................................:..........fig
BudgetPrepaationProcess...................................................�
OptionalOne Cent Sales Tax .................................................. 20
Y�: •
On page 1, Director Baird pointed out that of the total budget
$154,477,037, only 27% of the overall budget comes from ad valorem
taxes.
23
February 13, 1996 BOOK 9"7 Peri 294
BOOK 97 PnE285
COUNTY FUNDS
NOTE: FIGURES INCLUDE BUDGET AMENDMENTS PASSED THROUGH 01-31,96 ' I
Concerning page 2, Director Baird advised that the Board of
County Commissioners is only responsible for ad valorem taxing
funds on this page plus environmentally sensitive land, which
appears on the tax bill. There is only one general obligation bond
issue of the five on the tax bill that is the responsibility of the
Board of County Commissioners.
AD VALOREM TAXING NDS
� GG LENERA�FUIYp -
• TOTAL COUNTY -WIDE SERVICES -..
M.S.T.U.
UNINCORPORATED AREA EXPENDITURES
'� EINS
• FIRE AND ADVANCE LIFE SUPPORT SERVICES
COUNTY -WIDE (EXCLUDING INDIAN RIVER SHORES)
24
February 13, 1996
O
2
COUNTY TOTAL BUDGET FY 1995/96
$154,477,037
o
TAXIING FUNDS:
- GENERAL,, FUND
41,997,453
- M.S.T.U. (Municipal Service Taxing Unit)
14,140,259
- EMERGENCY SERVICES DISTRICT
12,679,149
68,816,861
o
ENVIRON. SENSITIVE LAND ACQUISTION BOND
1,677,228
o
TRANSPORTATION FUND
_ 9,426,711
o
SOLID WASTE
7,635,073
o
ENTERPRISE FUNDS
- GOLF COURSE
2,924,315
- COUNTY BUILDING DEPT.
933,787
- UTILITIES
17,194,601
21,052,703
o
-OTHER DEBT SERVICE FUNDS
1,384,983
o
INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS
4262,165
o
SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS
12,430,794
o
MAJOR CAPITAL PROJECTS
- ROAD PROJECTS
13,089,953
- OPTIONAL SALES TAX
9,110,116
- UTILITY IMPACT FEE PROJECTS.
7,596,450
29,796,519
NOTE: FIGURES INCLUDE BUDGET AMENDMENTS PASSED THROUGH 01-31,96 ' I
Concerning page 2, Director Baird advised that the Board of
County Commissioners is only responsible for ad valorem taxing
funds on this page plus environmentally sensitive land, which
appears on the tax bill. There is only one general obligation bond
issue of the five on the tax bill that is the responsibility of the
Board of County Commissioners.
AD VALOREM TAXING NDS
� GG LENERA�FUIYp -
• TOTAL COUNTY -WIDE SERVICES -..
M.S.T.U.
UNINCORPORATED AREA EXPENDITURES
'� EINS
• FIRE AND ADVANCE LIFE SUPPORT SERVICES
COUNTY -WIDE (EXCLUDING INDIAN RIVER SHORES)
24
February 13, 1996
O
2
Turning to page 3, Director Baird explained each of the main
categories of taxing funds. He pointed out that, according to
Florida State Statutes, the County contributes significantly to all
of the entities listed under General Fund. In fact, 60% of the
General Fund pays for outside agencies or constitutional officers,
and only roughly 25% is for the Board of County Commissioners'
departments.
Director Baird advised that of the $14 million M.S.T.U.
budget, $10.9 million transfers out to our Transportation Fund and
to the Sheriff's law enforcement portion of the General Fund. He
briefly explained the breakdown of the Sheriff's budget: court
services, corrections, and law enforcement and the source of
funding.
Director Baird briefly covered the Emergency Services District
portion and the breakdown of the Transportation Fund category.
TAXING FUNDS
• General Fund - Countywide Services
Judges, Court System, Public Defender, Probation,
State Attorney, HRS Health Dept., Medical Examiner,
Sheriff, Tax Collector, Property Appraiser, Clerk of Circuit
Court, Supervisor of Elections, Libraries, Recreation, B.C.C.,
County Attorney, County' Administrator, Budget Office,
Roads & Bridges
• Municipal Taxing Unit - M.S.T.U.
Unincorporated area - Unincorporated Services .
County Planning, Code Enforcement, Franchise Administration
Sheriff Law Enforcement, Roads & Bridges
Largest item = Transfers In/Out
• Emergency Services District
Includes entire County excluding Indian River Shores.
Fine and ALS
• Transportation Fund
Not a taxing fund, however, 66% of revenue comes
from tax funds (M.S.T.U. and General Fund).
Roads and Bridges, Public Works, County Engineering,
Traffic Engineering
25
February 13, 1996
k11
BooK 97 pr 286
BOOK 97 PAGE 207
Commissioner Eggert called attention to page 4 which she felt
was quite helpful and wanted Director Baird to provide a breakdown
by ad valorem tax alone so the difference can be seen_ between what
is coming in from grants, and so forth, as opposed to ad valorem
taxes.
Director Baird thought the information she was looking for was
provided on page 5, and Commissioner Eggert agreed it gave
excellent information.
GENERAL FUND EXPENDITURES
1994/95
1995/96
(DECREASE
PERCENTAGES OF TOTAL
_
AMOUNT
OF TOTAL
AMOUNT
OF TOTAL
AMOUNT
INCREASE/
$23,238,809
1994/95
$24,738,242
1995/%(DECREASE
$1,499,433
DELINQUENT AD VALOREM TAXES
134,328
0.34%
135,000
0.32%
$672
STATE REVENUE SHARING
AMOUNT
OF TOTAL
AMOUNT
OF TOTAL
AMOUNT
B.C.C.
CONSTITUTION 14
$9,908,271
24.91%
$10,4392244
24.86%
$530,973
CLERK OF CIRCUIT COURT
2,043,531
5.14%
2,115,163
5.04%
71,632
TAX COLLECTOR
PROPERTY APPRAISER
517,000
1.30%
545,000
1.30%
28,000
SHERIFF
1,575,090
3.%%
1,639,520
3.90%
64,430
SUPER. OF ELECTIONS
18,126,772
45.57%
19,003,622
45.25%
876,850
TOTAL CONSTITUTIONALS
402,659
22,665,052
1.01%
56.98%
451,149
23,754,454
1.07%
48,490
56.56%
1,089,402
STATE AGENCIES
1,883,288
4.73%
_ 1,979,641
4.71%
%,353
NON- PROFITORGS.
202,627
0.51%192,400
0.46%
(10,227)
QUASI -NON-PROFIT
409,549
1.03%
447,500
1.07%
37,951
CONTINGENCIES
FUND TRANSFERS (A)
329,837
0.83%
549,715
1.31%
219,878
CASH FORWARD
2,225,780
5.60%
2,482,428
5.91%
256,648
2,152,071
5.41%
2,152,071
5.12%
0
TOTAL GENERAL FUND
-100.00%
$41,997,453
100.00%
$2,220,978
(A) TRANSPORTATION
2,177,818
SAM
2,482,428
5.91%
304,610
HOUSING AUTHOR17 Y
TOTAL FUND TRANSFERS
47,962
01 NO
0
0.000/0
(47,962) -
2,2232780
5.60'/0
2,482,428
3.91%
256,648
GENERAL FUND REVENUE
PERCENTAGES OF TOTAL
F1
u
. INCREASE/
26
February 13, 1996
5
1994/95
1995/96
(DECREASE
AMOUNT
OF TOTAL
AMOUNT
OF TOTAL
AMOUNT
AD VALOREM TAXES
$23,238,809
58.42%
$24,738,242
58.90%
$1,499,433
DELINQUENT AD VALOREM TAXES
134,328
0.34%
135,000
0.32%
$672
STATE REVENUE SHARING
1,090,464
2.74%
756,558
1.80%
($333,906)
HALF CENT SALES TAX
1,170,948
2.94%
1,422,300
2.43%
($148,648)
JAI -ALAI FRONTON (RACING TAX)
446,500
1.12%
446,500.
1.06%$0
CASH FORWARD - OCT. 1
4,700,000
11.82%
4,589;749
10.91%
($119,251)
OTHER: FEES RENTS, INTEREST
8,995.426
22 61%
10,318,104
24.57%
$1,322,678
TOTAL REVENUE
$39.776.475
100.00%
$41,997,453
100.00%
$2,220,978
26
February 13, 1996
5
(Clerk's Note: Pages 6-16 were also provided to the Board and
are inserted herewith.)
M.S.T.U. EXPENDITURES
PERCENTAGES OF TOTAL
M.S.T.U. REVENUE 6
PERCENTAGES OF TOTAL
INCREASE/
1994/95 1995/% (DECREASE)
AMOUNT OF TOTAL AMOUNT OF TOTAL AMOUNT
AD VALOREM TAXES
$4,612,038
35.48%
$5,051,838
35.73%
INCREASE/
STATE REVENUE SHARING
1994/95
1995/96
1,134,837
(DECREASE)
$242,639
HALF CENT SALES TAX
996,169
7.66%
1,533,450
10.84%
$537,281
AMOUNT
OF TOTAL
AMOUNT OF TOTAL
AMOUNT
B.C.C.
$2,068,329
15.91%
$2,113,559
14.95%
S45,230
TAX COLLECTOR
68,606
0.53%
75,000
0.53%
$6,394
STATE AGENCIES
3,000
0.02%
3,000
0.02%
$0
CONTINGENCIES
124,609
0.96%
255,556
1.81%
$130,947
FUND TRANSFERS:
TRANSPORTATION
3,266 726
25.13%
3,723,643
26.33%
$456,917
SHERIFF
6,694 739
51.50%
7,195,098
50.88%
$500,359
CASH FORWARD
774,403
5.96%
774,403
5.48%
$0
TOTAL M.S.T.U.
$13,000,412
100.00%
$14,140,259
100,00%
$1,139,847
M.S.T.U. REVENUE 6
PERCENTAGES OF TOTAL
INCREASE/
1994/95 1995/% (DECREASE)
AMOUNT OF TOTAL AMOUNT OF TOTAL AMOUNT
AD VALOREM TAXES
$4,612,038
35.48%
$5,051,838
35.73%
$439,800
STATE REVENUE SHARING
892,198
6.86%
1,134,837
8.03%
$242,639
HALF CENT SALES TAX
996,169
7.66%
1,533,450
10.84%
$537,281
FRANCHISE TAX
3,650,000
28.080%
3,650,000
25.81%
$0
CASH FORWARD
2,503,952
19.26%
2,500,000
17.68%
($3,952)
OTHER INTEREST, FEES
346,055
2.66%
270134
191%
($75,921)
TOTAL REVENUE
$1.3,000,412
100.00%
$14,140,259
100.00%
$1,139.847
27
February 13, 1996
7
BOOK 9 7 FA F 2,8 8
BOOK 97 PA.IrJE289
TRANSPORTATION FUND -FUND 111
1995196 BUDGET
1994/95 1995/96 % OF INCREASE/
ACCOUNT NAME BUDGET BUDGET TOTAL (DECREASE)
ROADS AND BRIDGES
$5,176,571
$5,532,256
58.72%
$355,685
PUBLIC WORKS
371,521
386,218
4.10%
14,697
COUNTY ENGINEERING
865,025
910,129
9.66%
45,104
TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
1,037,435
1,165,123
12.37'/0
127,688
RESERVE - SALARIES
0
0
0.000/0
0 .
SUB -TOTAL EXPENDITURES
$7,450,552
$7,993,726
•84.85%
$543,174 ,
GENERAL & ADMIN• EXPENSE
284,741
517,036
5.49%
'232,295
RESERVE FOR CONTINGENCY
22,340
34,949
0.37%
12,609
CASH FORWARD - SEPTEMBER 30
975,000
975,000
9.290/o
0
TOTAL EXPENDITURES
902,633
S9,420,711
10000%
$788.078
(A) FUND TRANSFER 1N FROM
GENERAL FUND 52,177,818 52,482,428 26.35% $304,610
M.S.T.U. 3,266,726 3,723,643 39.53% 456,917
TOTAL 55,444,544 $6,206,071 65.88% 5761,527
E]
EMERGENCY SERVICE DISTRICT - FUND 114
1995/96 BUDGET
EXPENDIT M
1994/95
1995/96
% OF
INCREASE/
ACCOUNT NAME
BUDGET
BUDGET
TOTAL
(DECREASE)
CONSTITUTIONAL GAS TAX
$895,321
$1,208,018
12.82%
$312,697
COUNTY GAS TAX
419,658
448,649
4.760/o
28,991
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ASSESSMENT
447,097
330,000
3.50019
(117,097)
INTEREST - EARNINGS
115,000
96,500
Lorlo
(18,500)
OTHER REVENUE
70,070
112,330
1.190/0
42,260
FUND TRANSFER IN (A)
5,444,544
6,206,071
65.99%
761,527
LESS 5% EST. RECEIPTS
(97,357)
(107,565)
-1.140/o
(10,208)
CASH FORWARD - OCTOBER 1
1,338,300
1,126,708
1196%
(211,592)
TOTAL REVENUE
$8,632,633
S9,420,711
10000%
$789,.078
(A) FUND TRANSFER 1N FROM
GENERAL FUND 52,177,818 52,482,428 26.35% $304,610
M.S.T.U. 3,266,726 3,723,643 39.53% 456,917
TOTAL 55,444,544 $6,206,071 65.88% 5761,527
E]
EMERGENCY SERVICE DISTRICT - FUND 114
1995/96 BUDGET
EXPENDIT M
ACCOUNT NAME
1994/95
1995/96
% OF
INCREASE/
ACCOUNT NAME
BUDGET
BUDGET
TOTAL(DECREASE)
$1,327,507
FIRE DEPARTMENT
$8,509,582
$9,110,324
71.85%
$600,742
ALS
TRANSFERS - GENERAL FUND
3,330,379
3,568,825
28.15%
238,446
TOTAL FJIPENDITVRES
3,000 '
$11.842961
• 0
$12.679.149
0.000/0
100.00%
(3,000)
$$36188
OTHER CONTRIBUTIONS
ACCOUNT NAME
4994/95
BUDGET
1995/96
BUDGET
%OF
TOTAL(DECREASE)
INCREASE/
CURRENT AD VALOREM TAXES
DELINQUENT AD VALOREM TAXES
$9,624,362
$10,951,869
86.38%
$1,327,507
INTEREST
186,052
32,000
0.25%
(154,052)
GRANTS
262,500
262,500
_— 2.07%
0
ALS CHARGES
117,985
48,181
0.38%
(69,804)
OTHER CONTRIBUTIONS
918,000
918,000
7.24%
0
OTHER REVENUE
152,856
152,856
1.21%
0
SUBTOTAL REVENUE
48 650
$11,310,405
35 000
$12,400,406
0.28%
(13,650)
97.80%
$1,090,001
LESS 5% EST. RECEIPTS
CASH FORWARD - OCT. 1
(548,721)
(617,612)
-4.87%
(68,891)
TOTAL REVENt1E
1081,277
$11.842961
896 355
$12 679149
7.07%184
922
100 OlI%
5836188
9
28
February 13, 1996
a i M
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
TAXING DISTRICT SUMMARY
EMERGENCY SERVICES DISTRICT
PRIOR YEAR TAX BASE
4,519,144,981
1995/96
% Above or
NEW CONSTRUCTION
1994/95
Rolled Back 1995/96
(Below)
Ad Valorem Taxing Districts
Millalte Millase Millaae
Rolled Back
General Fund _=
4.2266
4.1264 4.2999
4.200/a
M.S.T.U.
1.5650
1.5173 1.6236
7.01%
Emergency Services District
2.1285
2.0772 2.3129
11.35%
Ad Valorem Tax - Voted
12
G.O. Environ. Sensitive Land
N/A
N/A 0.3069
N/A
Agaatcgate Millaee
6.8915
6.6539 7.0816
6.43%
10
1995/96 BUDGET
AD VALOREM TAXES
AD VALOREM
TOTAL
% TAXES
TAXES
BUDGET
TO TOTAL
GENERAL FUND
$24,738,242
$41,997,453
58:90%
M.S.T.U.
$5,051,838
$14,140,259
35.73%
E.M.S.
$10,951,869
$12,679,149
86.38%
VOTEDDEBT:
LAND ACQUISITION BOND
$1,765,503
$1,677,228
105.26%0
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
1l
TAX ROLL CHANGES
1994/95
1995%
TAX ROLL
% TAX ROLL
GENERAL FUND
PRIOR YEAR TAX BASE
5,406,243,871
5,464,325,993
NEW CONSTRUCTION
86,936,828
1.61% 156,262,554
286%
CHANGE IN EXISTING PROPERTY
(28 856 706)
(-0,53%) 132 650262
143%
TAX BASE
5,464,325,993
107% 5,753.239,809
S Z9'/o
FINAL TAX BASE
5,718,915,081
4.66%
MSTU
PRIOR YEAR TAX BASE
3,002,726,016
2,927,430,233
NEW CONSTRUCTION
37,726,158
1.260/a 92,002,993
3.14%
CHANGE IN EXISTING PROPERTY
(113,021,941)
(-3.769o') 92.037 943
3.14%
TAX BASE
2,927,430233
(-2.5101o) 3,111,471,169
6.29%
FINAL TAX BASE
3,086,517,875
5.43%
EMERGENCY SERVICES DISTRICT
PRIOR YEAR TAX BASE
4,519,144,981
4,493,766,111
NEW CONSTRUCTION
(2,636,084 1.39%
62,636,084
1.39%
CHANGE IN EMSTING PROPERTY
(88 014,954) U-1.95%)
179,791.95
3.9V%
TAX BASE
FINAL TAX BASE
4.493 766111 (-0.36%)
4 735 194 146
5.37%
4,701,403,556
4 6r/o
12
29
February 13, 1996
BOOK
97 F11, ,)r19,q9
BOOK 97 PAGE 291
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY MILEAGE RATES BY TAXIING AUTHORITY
GENERAL FUND
MS•T•U.
EMERGENCY SERVICES
SOUTH COUNTY FIRE
NORTH COUNTY
WEST COUNTY FIRE
4.29990
1.62360
231290
MA
N/A
N/A
4.22660
1.56500
2.12850
N/A
N/A
I N/A
4.24620
152470
2.14930
N/A
N/A
I N/A
4.20940
1.44550
2.28510
MA
N/A
I N/A
4.64230
150930
- N/A
1.79960
1.35000
I 0.75430
5.15120
1.62110
MA
1.62300
1.00000
1 0.29060
COUNTY -AGGREGATE
7.08160
621sol
6.89150
6.95680
6.89960
730100
SCHOOL
1.42310
1.46920
18.69390
1.58120
1.67200
1.76110
1.77000
1
SCHOOL STATE
6.49900
6.51000
1 6.46300
1 6.581001
6.36200
1 5.71500.
VERO BEACH
2.30416
2.34130
2.40000
2.40000
2.40000
2.45000
SEBASTIAN
6.000
6.90000
6.90000
6.44100
6.45200
6.50000
INDIAI!1 RIVER SHORES
1.42310
1.46920
18.69390
1.58120
1.67200
1.76110
1.77000
1
FELLSMERE
8.49230
N/A
9.77180
10.00000
10.00000
10.00000
ORCHID
2.91210
2.09790
2.39970
2.39970
3.49970
9.49970
MUNICIPALITY TOTAL
22.03166
21.49230
23.05270
22.91270
24.11280
30.21970
IIVDEPEMEIVT
N/A
N/A
N/A
0.56110
0.78060
N/A
HOSPITAL MAINTENANCE
1.10816
1.80445
1.13546
0.90464
0.78449
0.98368
SEBASTIAN INLET
0.10240
0.10260
0.10250
0.10330
0.10380
0.10630
MOSQUITO CONTROL
0.27247
0.27903
0.26043
0.21913
0.23156
0.24737
FL. DM AND NAVIGATION
0.04000
0.04900
0.05100
0.05200
0 mun
n ncenn
LIBRARY BOND
N/A
0.30060
0.30420
0.32820
0.35940
HOSPITAL
HOSPITAL I&S ('73)
0.06994
0.07576
0.07858
0.07431
0.08951
0.08077 '
HOSPITAL I&S ('75)
0.05109
0.05597
0.05882
0.05719
0.07044
0.08403
HOSPITAL I&S ('79)
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
0.22170
HOSPITAL I&S ('85)
N/A
N/A
N/A
0.08010
0.08260
0.23680
SCHOOL I&S ('91) Refunding
0.29600
0.26670
0.28990
0.30210
0.29820
N/A
SCHOOL I&S ('91) Gen. Oblig.
N/A
N/A
N/A
0.56110
0.78060
N/A
SCHOOL I&S (93)
0.91900
0.98730
0.93570
N/A
N/A
N/A
LAND AC UISITION BOND
0.30690
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
VOTER APPROVED TOTAL
1.64293
138573
1.66360 1
1.37900
1.64955
0.98270
13
30
Fehr 39 1996
m m a
SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL DISTRICT
1995/96 BUDGET
FUND 411
1994/95 1995/96 INCREASE/
BES BUDGET BUDGET (DECREASE)
GARBAGE SOLID WASTE SALES
$0
S0
$0
DEMOLTflON CHARGES
700,000
700,000
0
TIRE DUMPING CHARGES
61,000
61,000
0
RECYCLING SALES
210,000
400,000
190,000
SEPTAGE / SLUDGE DISPOSAL
44,000
50,000
6,000
CONTROLLED SUBSTANCE
10,500
10,500
0
LOT CLEARING REVENUE
39,000
40,000
1,000
INTEREST
LANDFILL ASSESSMENTS
449,000
150,000
309,000
150,000
(140,000)
SERVICE ASSESSMENTS
5,822,489
5,927,997
0
1.05,508
LESS 5% EST. RECEIPTS
(373,765)
(382,424)
. (8,659)
CASH FORWARD - OCT. 1
369 000
369 000
.
'o
TOTAL REVENUE
57.481.224
S7 635.073
S153.849
EXPENSES
REFUSE
LANDFILL
5329,255
$373.063
$245.810
RECYCLING
5 ,795.795
6,336,468
540,673
SUBWTAL E.IWENSES
2 696 774
58,821,824
1931 40
58,842,773
65 34
LESS CAPITAL OUTLAY
rl 340,600)
1 07 700
520,949
TOTAL EXPENSES
57.481,924
S7AM73
13 900
5153.849
ENTERPRISE FUNDS AND INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS
1995/96 BUDGET
USER FEES
INTEREST
LESS s% RECEIPTS
GOLF COURSE OPERATIONS
GOLF COURSE FOOD & BEVERAGE
GOLF COURSE CLUBHOUSE
BUILDING DEPARTMENT
UTILITIES - WAT72
iTnLxnES - SLUDGE
FLEET MANAGEMENT
ENTERPRISE
GOLF BUII DING COUNTY
COURSE DEPT. IE01j=
$3,004,543 5812,200 $16,224,065
47,368 15,000. 460,000
(152,596) (41,360) (834,203)
2,029,488
266,044
946,783
969,337
7,922,777
7,880,529
1,183,565
938,901
SUB -TOTAL EXPENSES
83,242,315
$969,337
$17,927,772
LESS CAPITAL OUTLAY
-918,000)
(33 50)
(731M
ZVTAL EXPENSES
5Z 9243158933
?87
817194 601
31
February 13, 1996
14
INTERNAL SERVICE
FLEET RISK
MGMT. MGMT.
$1,174,064 5994,428
0 130,OOD
0 (56,327)
0 0
$1.174.064 • $1:088.101
1,193,664
1091276
$1,193,664 51,091,276
(19,600) (3173)
51.174.064 51.088.101
15
eooK 97 pt".) 292
OTHER FUNDS
1995/96 BUDGET
o OTHER DEBT SERVICE FUNDS
o SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS
o MAJOR CAPITAL PROJECTS
- ROAD PROJECTS
- OPTIONAL SALES TAX
- UTILITY WACT FEE PROJECTS
BOOK 97 FnE 293
$1,384,983
$12,430,794
$13,089,953
$9,110,116
$7,596,450 $29,796,519
16
Moving to Page 17, 1996/97 Budget Expenditures, Director Baird
briefly described each of the listed elements.
1996/97 BUDGET EXPENDITURES
• Annualized Cost EMS Improvement
• Northwest Fire Station (Annualized Cost)
• 800 MHz System
• Annualized Cost of Salary Increase
• Collective Bargaining Contracts
• Health Insurance
• Mandates
• Constitutionals
• Outside Agencies
• PEP Reef Bond Issue
• Gifford Landfill
• Utility Bond Issue
• Waste Conversion Industrial Park
• Capital Projects
17
32
Febr3, 1996 � -
Commissioner Eggert wanted more done for economic development
within the budget in the coming fiscal year. She also wanted
consideration given to the North County Industrial Park and
Recreation Park land.
Director Baird, turning to Page 18, 1996/97 Budget Revenue,
felt there would be a slight growth in the tax roll. He felt State
Revenues will be stronger, especially in the 1/2 -cent sales tax,
due to all the new retail, Disney Resort, etc. He indicated that
it was difficult to predict the revenue from the State as they have
a tendency to change the formula. He explained that the Limited
Other Revenue Sources had little impact on our budget and that Cash
Forward would give a slightly negative impact. Building Revenues
are remaining stable, which is an indication that we should have a
good New Construction portion of the tax revenue.
Chairman Adams asked how new construction relates to "building
revenues" and Director Baird clarified the process for her.
1996/97 BUDGET REVENUE
• Tax Roll Growth
- New Construction
- 3% Cap
• State Revenues
• Limited Other Revenue Sources
• Cash Forward
• Building Revenues
is
Director Baird next described each phase and cycle of the
Budget Preparation Process as outlined on Page 19. He advised that
the main reason the budget process is not begun earlier is due to
the State and the State agencies that feed off the County through
the general fund. The biggest reason is the TRIM notices and also
33
February 13, 1996
BOOK 97 F''E 294
BOOK 97 FADE 95
when the Property Appraiser delivers the tax roll, per State law,
on June 30th. Also the State cannot give the County the revenue
until late June or July, so those big chunks are missing in the
budget. Usually 60a of the General Fund budget is an unknown until
the last week of June.
BUDGET PREPARATION PROCESS
FEB I MAR I APR I MAY I JUNE I JULY I AUG I SEPT
DirectorMepartmental
Staff input
County AdmindBudget Review
Preliminary Budget Prepared
Budget
Workshop
Preliminary Budget
Revised
Budget
Adopted
The above chart indicates the time flame for major segments of the County's budget preparation process
from February to September. Not shown is a time line for monitoring and control of adopted budgets
that spans a twelve month period. Monthly financial reports and detailed line item reports are issued on
a monthly basis to assist the departments in this ongoing process.
19
In response to Commissioner Eggert's question, Director Baird
explained the Tourist Tax applications start in -march -April. The
problem is that agencies of the State Departments fill out their
packets, but have to alter them later in the process due to what
the State denies or changes in their formula and that can affect us
dramatically.
34
Februar 13, 1996
Responding once again to Commissioner Eggert, Director Baird
advised he generally brings information to the Board in May for the
final decision on tourist tax. Any applicants for Tourist Tax
funds should contact his office immediately for the packets.
Comm-ittee meetings will be held the end of March/beginning of
April.
Commissioner Tippin indicated that his committee, the Tourist
Development Council, is very happy to hear any request, but it must
be related to tourism.
Director Baird indicated there are actually very few tourist
tax dollars remaining after 50% goes to the PEP Reef bonds. The
Chamber of Commerce is designated as our tourist bureau.
_ (Clerk's Note: Final page of preliminary budget review was
not discussed but is included here for information.)
PROPOSED RECOMMENDED OPTIONAL SALES TAX PROGRAM FOR SECOND FIVE YEAR
(JUNE 1,1994 TO SEPTEMBER 30,1999) - AS OF 01-31-%
CAPITAL EXPENDITURES
1994As 1993/46
1996197
1997/
10-9970
09-30-" t
TOTAL.
REVENUE
S3 744.114
S3 973,879
12,834
56461,346
—S7A.39ZI73
EXPENSE
51601000
5160000
ROADS - RIGHT OF WAY
BRIDGES
51,084,732
S1,644,400
52,030,000
S4 739132
PEIMON PAVING
51109000
5363,000
s113o,000 -- SI 803
54609,502
PUBLIC WORKS FACII=
5374
5300 000
5300,000
5300000
SI 460
ST�DRMWATERDRNNAGE
Sl ,000
51070 600
370,600
SIDEWALKS AND B1KE PATHS
S100,973
SI00,000
slop 000
51.100.000
SI100,000
S300.973
800 MHz SYSTEM
THWF3f STATION
52,993.
52,333,823
s0
SS 51,323
S350,000
so
s0
S350.000
SOUTH COUNTY PHASE B
5633000
MdXMALD PARK -BOARDWALK & PICNIC
S90,000
5300000
5633.000
ROUND ISLAND PARK - PHASE II
-_-_so
000
5253 000
5202,433
S38Q 000
$337.433
ORTH COUNTY RECREATION COMPLEX
NPnAIF
ARKDeROVEMENis
sl 000
s0
SO
000
5300 000
KROEOl7. HOMESM
so
iSO
5140000
WIINBROW/R/AIiASSO BOAT DOCKS
S60.000
SD
so
S0
S601000"
GENEULSER
OVATION OF ANNEX & CURRENT ADMIN. BLDG.
5617 002
MIN BLDG. -HVAC RENOVATION
51,138,300
5617 000
ADMIN. BLDG. D ETC
SLI W
LIBRARY
512.000
SO
so
ORTH COUNTY LIBRARY PARKING LOT
1000
LD COURTHOUSE
VIDEO PRESENTATION SYSTEM
524133
7-05-01000
5263 000
5613000
-19TH AVE. A 27TH STREET
S31,2W
$24133
L77AJLWMVOA-E-NTBONDS
s0Id..5373000
s0
5400000
S400 000
W01000
S377,796
5276.=
S304
S26S
Sl
�'F.NSES
59110116
37181 1
1719SS
041
52733
ANNUAL I.USS337Z2961002
1
1883
51419963s0
EMULATIVE-ME-FlUnYSURPLM I
SDI 5193.70611401078
(51,419.963A
so
•••� -5' snuJ ,mwa FmJCCUI amr me MA; tms appravad timdmg Tram Optional Saha, Tax. Some prajeets here baa disaived but hndmg bwnot been
approved by the BCC. Ermmples are the Noah Canty hdmtrial Pads bard pmehsse and the fOU Cost of park property in North Colmty ( SS00.000 of the esl�ated
SIJ00 000 is bo ftetedl
aav� v:.+.r -AW
35
20
February 13, 1996 Boos 97 PD ,-296
BOOK 97 PACE 297
COMMENTS RE CRITICISM OF CO Y DEVELOPMENT
DIRECTOR'S LAAC RECOM ENDATIONS
Commissioner Macht asked that he be permitted time to comment
on a recent article in the newspaper, based on an interview with an
elected local official who heavily criticized Community Development
Director Bob Keating for continuing to recommend the purchase of a
particular piece of property to the LAAC.
Commissioner Macht felt that the person who had made the
critical remarks should know the difference between the staff's
function, the committee's function, and the County Commissioners'
function and that Director Keating's recommendations are based on
the law, technicalities of his position, and, in this instance,
referendum mandates.
Commissioner Macht went on to explain that the committee
members and Commissioners make their decisions based on other
factors; people need to understand that staff does not make policy
decisions. He felt it was very inappropriate and unfair to
criticize a__staff member who cannot reply in the same fashion.
Chairman Adams, Commissioner Bird, Commissioner Eggert, and
Commissioner Tippin agreed with his remarks.
Chairman Adams announced that the Board would be returning at
5:01 p.m. for a public hearing on changes to the Land Development
Regulations. (LDR's)
There being no further business, on Motion duly made, seconded
and carried, the Board adjourned at 10:00 a.m.
ATTEST:
J. K. Barton, Clerk Fran B. Adams, Chairman
Minutes approved on 3' �- I b
36
Februar 13, 1996
0 W