The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1999-10640 ob V 1 d ,e. ,,Ae - 0 � y9- rad APPLICATION FOR SMALL CITIES COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CATEGORY SUBMITTED TO THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS 1999 PREPARED BY $eT47 H P7.. ar 1311 Executive Center Drive, Suite 260 Tallahassee, Florida 32301 (850)878-8963 40 40 Florida Department of Community Affairs Jarnes F. Turley, Secretary G. Steven Pfeiffer, Assistant Secretary Douglas Buck, Director Division of Housing and Community Development Thomas Pierce, Chief Bureau of Community Development Community Development Block Grant Section Susan Cook, Community Program Administrator Rick Boyd, Planning Manager Rick Slauts, Planning Manager Harold Eastman, Planner IV Steve Fellerman, Planner IV Vacant, Development Representative II Millie Schroeder, Community Assistance Consultant Cherie Bryant, Community Assistance Consultant Pat Harvey, Administrative Assistant I Central Sursno_ tt-4rtit Mark Nixon, Planning Manager Evangelina Sanchez -Thorpe, Community Assistance Consultant Judy Peacock, Community Assistance Consultant Rosemary Scaringe, Administrative Assistant. II Amy Duggar, Administrative Secretary Department of Community Affairs Division of Housing and Community Development Sadowski Building 2555 Shumard Oak Boulevard Tallahassee, Florida 32399.2704 (850)487-3644 FAX (850) 922-5609 The publication of this document was financed by the Florida Small Cities Community Development Block. Grant Program and was produced at an annual cost of 52,040 or $2.50 per copy to inform the public of the program's requirements. 410 40 Deadline and Submission Requirements A. The Department will publish a Notice of Funding Availability (NOFA) and an initial application deadline fpr the Economic Development category in the Florida Administrative Weekly (FAVi). Applications must be received by tate Department, whether mailed or delivered, at the followirry address: Division of Housing and Community Development 2555 Shumard Oak Boulevard, Room 260 - N or 260 - A. Tallahassee, Flodda 32399-2100 B. Applications will be accepted any time after the initial application deadline, subject to availability of funds. C. Local governments must submit two copies of the complete application to the Department, at least one of which must have original signatures. Both copies should be spiral bound or stapled with no hard cover. D. Complete all blanks because missing or incorrect information will negatively affect the score. E. If appropriate, show the numerator and denominator of each fraction, and the multiplier and ttre multiplicand of each calculation. F. Round all calculations to TWO decimal places. G. Sequentially number the page and appendices. It. Intergovernmental Coordination and Review (IC&R) A. All local governments applying for CDBG funds must comply with the Intergovernmental Coordination and Review (IC&,R) process. By the date the application is received by the Department, must have mailed fifteen copies of the following information to the Florida State Clearing House, Department of Community Affairs, 2555 Shumard Oak Boulevard, Tallahassee, Florida 32399.2100: 1. The Application Summary (CDBG-E-2); 2. All (Naps (CDBG-E•7 ); and, 3, Historic Preservation Checklist (CDBG-E-8). B. In addition, by the date the application is received by the Department, the local government must have submitted one additional copy of the IC&R materials to the Regional Planning Council that serves the local government. C. A transmittal letter must accompany the IC&R materials which the local government is sending to the State Clearing House. In this letter, request that the State Clearing House send to the CDBG Section of the Department, complementary copies of any correspondence that they may send to the local government. If needed, request chat the State Clearing House send copies to other parties as desired by the local governmenl, such as consultants and engineers. Cil LIST OF ATTACHMENTS Item Appendix SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION THAT MUST BE SUBMITTED WITH THE APPLICATION (CD)IG-E-10] LOCAL GOVERNMENT COMMITMENT LETTER(S): A (CDEG-E-10, A.) Letter must include the following: Letter from local govemrtrcnt describing the scope, purpose, etc. of the project A (CDBG-1110, A., 1., a., b., c., d., e., r, 9.) The Department may require a statement ofcommimreni from any other entity A whose participation or investment is necessary for the successful completion of the project. (CDBG-E-10, A.,2.) — NA Document through cost estimates for all activities (other than administration and B engineering), the basis for the amount of CDBG funds requested in the application. Cost estimates are required for all components of the proposed ac d%ities to be paid for with CDBG funds (CDBG-E-10, A.,3.) If real property is being acquired, include copies of property ta.x statements, NA disinterested third party appraisals, an appraisal from a certified appraiser, or some other determination of value that documents that the proposed purchase price is based on the fair market valuc of the property; (CDBG-E-10, A.,3., a.) If buUding construction or rehabilitation is proposed, include cost estimates from a B general Mtractor, engineer, or architect, or from a recently completed similar facility: (CDBG-E-10, A.,3,, b.) It acquisition of new or used machinery and equipment is proposed, include cost B estimates from a ,possible vendor or invoices from prior recent acquisitions (CDBG-E-10, A.,3., c.) If acquisition of uscd machinery or equipment is proposed from other than a NA normal vendor, include a disinterested third parte appraisal demonstrating the current value. (CDBG-E-10, A.,3., d.) -- NA _1 40 List of Attachments, Page 2 llcm Appendix LOCAL GOVERNMENT DOCUMENTATION FOR INFRASTRUCTURE NA PROJECTS ONLY (CDBG-E-10, B.) Local Government ShaW Provide a certification from an engineer that the proposed route, scope, cost, and NA size of the proposed infrastructure is tate minimum necessary to provide for the needs of the Participating Party(s). If this determination is made based upon. permitting requirements of a state or federal agency, document those requirements from that agency; (CDBG-&10, B., 1.) For Ute purpose ofdocumemring public benefit only, agree that if upon completion NA of the project, the threshold cost per job of $35,400 is not attained, the local government shall continue to track all jobs creased..._ (CDBG-E-10, B., 2.) Provide an unequivocal statemem that, if [lie local government does not provide the NA CDBG funded infrastruc(ure to the job creation location, the jobs cannot be created or relained by the Parlicipaung Part) (s) (CDBG F,10, B., 3.) Include cost estimates from an engineer, copies of previous bids from contractors. NA or cost from a recently completed similar activity (CDBG-E-10, B., 4.) OTHER JURISDICTIONAL ACTIVITY INFORMATION NA (CDBG-E-10, C.) -- NA INITIAL PARTICIPATING PARTY COAT i11ITNI ENTS C All commitments must be binding, but may be contingent upon the receipt of the CDBG funds, and must include an expiration date, if appropriate. Commitments must include any conditions that must be tile( by the local government or any third party before perforniance under the commitment is binding. Allacluuents or appendices must be on Participating Party leuencvad, or signed or initialed by the Participating Party. (CDBG-E-10, D.) The commitment shall include: A clear statement of the concept, scope, and cost of its part of the project. Pro%idei C a brief description of each Participating Party that documents its exact legal name... (CDBG-E-10, D., 1.) The nature of its commilinem , including tine total number ofjobs to be created... C (CDBG-E-10, D., 2.) Table: of Contents Page 3 Item JApe1n,dhxA clear statement of «ilIingness to sign a legally banding Participating Parry Agreement (CDBG-E-10, D,,3.) The identity and location of any collateral to be pledged by the panicipating Party NA or any other requirements to be met that is required by the loci] govcmmeni (CDBG-E-10, D.A.) That each principal wiZI personally guarantee the CDBG loan if any portion of the C grant is to be used for a loan to a for-profit business (CDBG-E-10, D.,S.) The names, titles, and ownership shares of all principals; (CDBG-E-10, D.,6..) C That the job creation ]oration would not have b6en selected without the local government's agreement to ro"Fide an C p y proposed infrastructure (CDBG-E-IO, D.,T.) The uses and the amounts to which all leverage and equity funds will be C dedicated.... (CDBG-E-10, 1x1.,8.) Adequate information to complete HUD Form 2880 to document the pecuniary C interest and other disclosure requirements (CDBG-E-10, D.;9.) A statement that for the last [%%o years: C The Participating Party has not declared bankruptcy; and That no principal of the Participating Party has declared bankruptcy, (CDBG-E-IO, D.,1o.) BUSINESS PLAN, to include the foilo%tiing: (CDBG-E-10, E.) D T)Pe of organization (slap-up) (CI)BG-E-10, (CI)BG-E-10, E., 1, ) Organization Structure (corporation) (CDBG-E-l0, E., 2.) n SIC code, tiiston., product line. (C1)BG-E-10, E., 3.} t7 CDBG-E-1 SCORING SUMMARY INSTRUCTIONS: This form will function as a table of contents as well as a scoring summary. It should be completed last, utilizing scores from each of the forms identified below, After completing the remainder of the application, number all of the pages of the application, Including the Appendix. Enter "total" scores under the column marked `Score." Total the "Score" column and enter this figure as the "Total Application Score." Enter the corresponding page numbers for each of the forms under the column marked "Pace." Local Government Applicant: Indian River County Application # (DCA Use Only): EA- Igo. FORM # TITLEISCORE PAGE SCORE Community -Wide Needs Score (250 Points Maximum) 4 58.42 E4 Local Government Checklist E•2 Application Summary 5 E-3 Sources and Uses of Funds Summary 10 E-0 Project Impact t4 E-5 Program Impact Summary Form (650 Points Maximum) 21 550 E-6 Equal Opporlunity Employment/Fair Housing (100 Points Maximum) 22 15,22 TOTAL APPLICATION SCORE (1000 POINTS MAXIMUM) LESS PENALTIES ASSESSED (For DCA Use only) FINAL SCORE (For DCA Use Only) 25 E-7 Maps Checklist E-8 Historic Preservation Checklist 26 E-9 Assurances, Certifications, and Signatures 32 E-10 Supporting Documents to be Submitted with the Application 3si E-11 Supporting Documents nsi! Required with the Application !None APPENDICES Node Applicafion Preparation Cost Oocunlendafion, Historic Preservation Documentation, Documentation !Normally Required within the fill bay period, (these items are not applicable) A Documentation Required with the Application (Indian River County Letter of Commitment) 8 Documentation Required with the Application: (Project Cost Documentation) C Leverage Documentation including CRA Care Centers Letter of Commitment D E Documentation Required with the Application (Business Plan) Other Community Development Activities Documentation (Number of County Employees. Public Hearing Notices, Copies of Intergovernmental Review Jolters F Documentation Required with the Application (Pro Forma Financial Profections) G Documentation Required with the Application (Zoning and Water/Sewer Capacq Certi) H I Maps 1) Applying Local: Government(s): _Indian River County 2) Name of Chief Elected Official: (Typed) CDBG-E-2 APPLICATION SUMMARY 6) Agency or Firm Responsible For Preparing ApplIca lion_ B iQans n-& He[tlyaz_ 7) Preparer 1311 Executive Ce[dwJa j l+ a. Suite 261 Address: TWtahasSee. Florida_323DI 3) X955 �i840-25th Stree! 8) Telephone Number: W(850) 878-8,3 —Vero Beach. Florida -322§Q_ 9) Contact Person: _AndyEaslaa 4) Local Government Phone:_(561 )567-8000 10)County: _lndian_Riyar 5) Local Government Liaison: Rater Radke 11) Type of Applicant: Individual _x Joint: (See Rule 98-43.004, Florida Administrative Code) 12) Requested CDBG Project Cost: 13) Requested CDBG Administrative Cost: 14) Requested CDBG Engineering Cost: 15) TOTAL CDBG FUNDS REQUESTED: $____60.000 $ nom s�750.Qms (12+13+14) 16) Program Income to be expended:: $ pone 17) Other ,private funds from all sources: $ `IM $$5 (54,279,860 + $250,025) 18) Other Public funds from all sources: $ none 19) Total Gross Project Cost: $ .5.3.I�m (15+16+17+ 18) 'Note: For Grant scoring purposes, only $1,500,000 is being clal'medas private leverage. 20) PROJECT AREA DISTRICTS: U.S_ Congressional District Number. ^15` Census Tract:_4,aL96 Florida Senate District _2I_ Florida House District: _32_ Census Place: _034— Block Group($): 5 CDBG.F-2 APPLICATION SUMMARY 21) APPLICATION NARRATIVE AND PUBLIC BENEFIT NARRATIVE Provide a detailed narrn,uve of the proposed project describing. The roles of all Participating Parties, local governments, other government agencies, developers. and other parties whose actions or participation are necessary for the success of the project; Indian River County (the grant applicant) is applying. for CDBG funds to be used as a low Interest loan to a private for profit business and for grant administration activities. The low Interest loan will be used by the private business as parilai funding for the construction of an elder care facility and as partial funding for the facility's fixtures, furnishings and equipment. The facility Is classified by the State of Florida as an Assisted Llving Facility (ALF). The facility will be owned and operated by a private for profit organization known as CRA Care Centers, Inc, (The participating party), The facility will provide care Levels from nearly independent to extended care which involves some skilled nursing. Also, dementia core (Alzheimer's and other types of dementia) will be provided In a separate secured, specially designed part of the building. There are no other participating parties other than CRA Care Centers, Inc. The low Interest loan will be used as gap financing. CRA Care Centers, Inc. is able to qualify for only a portion of the total project costs, thus the need for gap financing. Also, in order to ensure a feasible project, the loan needs to be at a 4% Interest rate. If CDBG funds are not forthcoming, CRA will not be able to develop a feasible project and this much needed ALF will not be able to begin operations as planned. Failure to begin operation will also mean that jobs for low to moderate Income persons will not be realized. CRA estimates that within 24 months of grant award the ALF will be at 50 1/. capacity and that 26 Jobs will have been created. Within 30 months of grant award, the ALF will be at full capacity with 35 jobs anticipated. For grant scoring purposes, CRA is committing to create 26 jobs within five years of grant award. At the time of hiring, at least 51% of the new employees (14) will have low to moderate household incomes as defined by HUD income limits. How a national objective will be met pursuant to Rules 96-43 006(2)(b) and 9B-43 011(3) and (4), Florida Administrative Code, and 24 G.F.R. Section 570.483 (b)(4). if a national objective is attained under the provisions of 24 C.F R. Section 570.483(b)(4)(iv)or (v), documentation must be provided with the application; A national objective will be met by the creation of new Jobs that will be made available to persons with low to moderate incomes. For grant scoring purposes, CRA Care Center, Inc. is comnriffing to create 26 Jobs within two yoars of grant award, At the time of hiring, at least $i% of the new employees (14) will have low to moderate household incomes as defined by HUD income limits. Why the CDBG assistance is needed in the proposed project, Indian River County (the grant applicant) is applying for CDBG funds to fund a low interest loan to a private for profit business. The loan will be used to as partial funding for the construction of a 42,500 square foot, 70 bed Assisted Living Facility (ALF), The ALF will be owned and operated by CRA Care Centers, Inc., a private for profit organization. Without the CDBG-ED tow interest loan, the proposed ALF would be unable to begin operations as planned. The loan Is serving as gap financing. Also, in order to ensure a financially feasible project, the loan needs to be at a 4% Interest rate. If COUG funds are not forthcoming, CRA wilt not be able to develop this much needed ALF and the planned that jobs for low to moderate income persons would not be realized All the activities to be undertaken as part of the project, without regard to lite funding source or whether the funding for the activity will be counted for leverage; and Indl�in River County (the grant applicant), through the Indian River Board of County Commissioners, is applying for a $750,000 CDBG grant that will fund a low-interest loan that will be provided to CRA Care Centers, Inc. The loan will be used as partial funding of an Assisted living facility (ALF) to be owned and operated by CRA Care Centers, Inc, Other project funding sources Include owner equity and a loan from a commercial lending Institution. The total ALF project cost, Including grant administration is $5,375,885. Funding sources and amounts Include $690,000 as a CDBG-ED loan to CRA Care Centers, $60,000 In CDBG-ED funds to Indian River County for administration, $4.279,660 as a commercial lending Institution to -in to CRA Care Centers, Inc. and $350,023 owner equity to be spent after the date of grant award. Owner equity funds will be used for operating deficit& and for loan fees, broker leer, and charges. Please note that this is an estimate and that ecla.af amount of Cwner 4aulty niuy change, For grant scoring purposes, we are claiming only $1,500,000 from the comrnerolat funding institution loan as private leverage. The Commercial and CDBG•E0 loans will fund the purchase of a 22 acre site and the construction of a 42,500 square foot ALF building with associated fixtures, furnishings, equipment, parking, landscaping and waterlsewer connections. The types, number, wage rates, etc. for the jobs to be created or retained by the Participating Partys) All jobs will be created by CRA Care Centers. The types, numbers and wage rates of each job Is described In the table below. Document the public benefit by Describing the number and types of jobs to be created or retained in relation to the employment needs of low and moderate income persons and other persons likely to be employed or retained; For grant application scoring purposes, CRA Care centers, Inc, is committing to create 26 now jobs. At the time of hiring, at least 51°% of the new employees (14) will have low to moderate household incomes as defined by HUD income limits. The ALF will provide care levels from nearly independent to extended care which involves some skilled nursing. Also, dementia care (Alzheimer's and other types of dementia) will be provided In a separate secured, specially designed part of the building. The majority of jobs to be created will be service type occupations that would be required to serve the elderly and handicapped. The types of jobs that will be needed to serve the ALF residents are shown In the chart below, The majority of the jobs to be created will be readily available to persons with a high school education. A review of 1990 census information for the Indian River County area shows there is a significant number of residents In the County that have only a high school education or below and would benefit greatly from this project. CRA Care Centers, Inc. estimates within 24 months of grant award the ALF will be at 50% capacity and that 28 jobs will have been created. Within 30 months of grant award, the ALF will beat full capacity with 35 jobs anticipated. For grant scoring purposes, CRA Is committing to create 26 jobs within two years of grana award. A detailed listing of the number and types of jobs to be created by this project is included in the Business Pian, white a summary of he jobs to be created is shown below. Jobs to be Created by CRA Care Centers. Inc ,lob Category Annual Salary LMI (FTE) Non LMI (FTE) Total Administrator 44,000 1 1 Fiscal Assistant 23,040 1 1 RN 38,000 .3 .3 Social Director 29,000 1 1 Receptionist 17,500 .5 .5 CNAI Personal Care Assistant 18,200 14 .5 14.5 Lead CNA 18,000 3 3 LPN 30,000 4,5 4.5 Chef 28,000 1 1 Cook 17,000 1 1 Asst Cask 15,120 5 _ 5 Housekeeper 15,120 1 .5 1.5 Maintenance 17,000 1 1 Total 21 14.3 35.3' -Vnly Lit toils 101 wn3C11 14 will Oe made av34Iable to LMI persons) are being counted for grant application scoring Purposes, Describing any additional development, spin-off lobs, and need for additional goods and services which aro likely to be stimulated in the area by the proposed project; The CRA Care Centers facility (the Job creation site) will be located In unincorporated Indian River County just outside of the City of Sebastian. Tho facility will create additional traffic in the Sebastian area. This traffic will be generated from the people visiting and working at the ALF facility. The increased traffic flow should generate additional customers to existing commercial establishments In the area and may encourage the formation of additional businesses. However, It Is not known at this time which. If any, new businesses will be created as a result of this CRA Care Centers project. Describing what increases, if any, will occur in the tax base, including property, sales, and other taxes; The new building and site improvements planned by CRA Care Centers, Inc. as part of this CDBG funded project will result Ina significant Increase in County property taxes. The new facilities will have an assessed value of over $3 million and will be taxed accordingly. There will also be local occupational license fees. Specifying the anticipated training needs of low and moderate income persons who may apply for the created jobs; and how and who will be providing the training; and CRA Care Centers, Inc, will have an in-house training program. The CRA will also utilize the services of local vocational training school(s). Training will be provide In job specific skills such as food preparation, elder care and nursing. Stating that the cost per job created or retained by each participating party as a direct result of the CDBG assisted activity by each Participating Party is less than $35,000 per job in CDBG funds. The cost per job created as a direct result of CDBG assistance will be less than the maximum cost per job of $35,000. If a loan is proposed from CD8G funds, specify the exact corporate, personal, or partnership name of the borrower(s) and guarantor(s), amount of the loan request, proposed interest rate, proposed term of the loan, frequency of payment, type and value of collateral offered, and proposed lien or mortgage position of the CDBG loan. (The interest rate may be no less than 5.5 percent per annum below the prime interest rate as of the date of the application for this phase, but in no case may it be less than 4 percent per annum), Exact Corporate Name of Borrower: CRA Care Centers, Inc. Type of Organisation: Corporation Guarantor(s), William H. "Bud" Clark Proposed Interest Rate: 4% Proposed Tern, of Loan: 20 years for building, 7 years for furnishings and equipment Amount of CDBG Loan Request: S640,000 Proposed First Payment Date: January 1, 2001 Frequency of Payment: Monthly i Type and Value of Collateral Offered: Building, land and equipment Proposed Lien or Mortgage Position of the CDBG Loan 2nd on the buildings and land 1st on equipment 22) 1s the local government participating in the National Flood insurance Program? Yes x� No 23) Has the local government been declared to be in a state of financial emergency pursuant to Section 218.54 - 218.5S4, Florida Statutes at any time during the two years prior to submission to the application? Yes ^ No x CDBG•E-3 SOURCES AND USES OF FUNDS ACTIVITY NUMBERS AND DESCRIPTIONS: When making reference to specific eligible activities, use the designated activity number, activity description and sub -activity on all BUDGET FORMS. Activily, UyMber 6rlWy Description with Sub -activities Activity Number 6diivity Descfttion with $ub activities 001 Acquisition Land Building Easement or right,of-way Other (specify) 002 Demolition of Vacant Dilapidated Structures Removal of Architectural Barriers in 04a Fire Protection Fire hydrants 04a Water Facilities Water lines Water tank 013 Water treatment 014b Water Well Other (specify) 04b Sewer Facilities 015c Force sewer main 016 Gravity sewer main 010 Sewer treatment Pumpflik stations Other (specify) 04c Flood and Drainage Storm drains Catch basin Retention Pond Curb and gutter Other (Specify) 005 Street Improvements Street resurfacing Street lights Curb and gutter Other (specify) 006 Parking Facilities Demolition Parking spaces Other (specify) 006 Pedestrian Malls and Walkways 006 Relocation of Utilities to Underground Electrical Natural gas Other (specify) 006 Solid Waste Disposal 10 008 Relocation cog Rehabilitation of Commercial Buildings FOR NON-CDBG FUNDS ONLY 905 Initial Inventory - Start-ups only 906 Increase in Inventory 910 Non -capitalized tools and equipment 920 Other- Describe Facade rehabilitation Section 504 compliance Correction of code violation Building rehabilitation by ownerltenant Other (specify) oil Removal of Architectural Barriers in Public Buildings Curb cuts Restroams Entrances Other (specify) 013 Administration 014b Direct Assistance to For Profit Entities (Specify by activity number the type of assistance) 015c Historic Rehabilitation and Preservation 016 Engineering 010 Other (specify) FOR NON-CDBG FUNDS ONLY 905 Initial Inventory - Start-ups only 906 Increase in Inventory 910 Non -capitalized tools and equipment 920 Other- Describe ooBm's'o onVncE AND USE oPFUNDS 1. SOURCES mpALL. PROJECT FUNDS; pmmcinxm _ RA Care -Centers, Inc.' a H. Uses of All Project Funds: xCzw uonv/rv arnount � $ �----_—.-------_ cnam x x �A Lllliin H, Clads ELirqJ_,!oIonI_QapiIal Inc. 920 Sewer Facilities $11,000 920 Water Facilities $36,000 920 Land $25,000 $315,060 014b Building $550,000 $2,500,500, 920 Professional Fees $234,000 920 Site Work $280,000 920 PermitFees $19,000 920 ConnectiontImpact Fees $35.000 014b FixtureslFurnishingslEquipmt $140,000 $26,000 920 Soft Costs (Start-up Costs) $325,025 $823,360 Requested CDBG Project Cost $690,000 Z� 013 Proposed Administrative Cost $60,000 920 Proposed Engineering Cost 0 Total Gross Project Cost $750,000 $350,025 $4,279,860 'Note: Only $1,5ont0on/vbeing oommmeofor grant application scoring purposes. CDBG-L-3 SOURCES AND USES OF FUNDS III. PROGRAM INCOME If applicable, what are the sources of the program income that will be expended as part of the Total Gross Project Cosi? Any Program Income must also be reflected on Fonns CDBG-3(16) and CDBG-E-3(I and 4), Sources and Uses of Funds Grant Grant # IV. CDBG ADMINISTRATION A. Percent CDBG Administration Requested Amount of Program Income Amount of Program Income ADMINISTRATIVE FUNDS REQUESTED + TOTAL CDBG FUNDS REQUESTED - I __ % (Limited to 8% of CDBG Funds pursuant to 9B-43.066(4), Florida Administrative Code) Does the local government desire to pay the cost of grant application preparation from the grant, awarded? Yes Amount of Payment $ No -X If the local government desires to pay for a grant writer from the grant award, the grant writer must have been procured pursuant to 24 C.F.R. Section 85.36 and Rule 913-43,013(1), Florida Administrative Code, as it existed on the day of advertising for the Request for Proposal. A copy of the Request for Proposal' advertisement, the ranking sheets, minutes of the meeting where the grant writer was selected, a copy of the invoice from the grant writer for the cost of application preparation, and a copy of tate contract between the local government and the grant writer must be maintained for future monitoring, or the pre -agreement cost will be disallowed, It the Department determines that the procurement processor the contracting process was flawed, or that the expense is not eligible, the expense will be disallowed and deobligated by the Department. Copies of invoices for other third party direct costs must be provided if they are to be eligible for eventual payment. If the local government prepared the application using local government staff or the staff of another governmental agency selected pursuant to Chapter 287, Florida Statutes, the local govemment may seek payment only for direct costs incurred as part of grant application preparation. In order to be eligible for payment, documentation of those direct costs must be provided with the application. Should this documentation not he provided with the application, no costs will be allowed. DOCUMENTATION OF APPLICATION PREPARATION COSTS IS NOT APPLICABLE TO THIS PROJECT 12 C[MG-l<-s S0URCrS ANIS USES OF FUNDS V. ENGINEERING COST REQUESTED -- NONE Engineering expenses requested by tate local goveTnment to be paid with CABG funds (re: FmHA Form 'l342-13, and. -We 90-43.000(5), Florida Administrative Code). (a) Basic Fee requested per Table I or Fable tl $ (b) Resident Inspection Fee requested per Table I(A) or Table II(A) (c) Preliminary Engineering Fee requested $ (d) Additional Engineering Services requested (Section o) $ NA TOTAL_ ENGINEERING BUDGET REQUESTED $ (e) CDBG Net Construction Cost (Grant Request - (Administration + Engineering + Activities not requiring engineering (i.e.. Relocalion, Displacement. Acquisition, etc.))) PERCENT of CD8G Net Construction Cost requested for basic fees V(a) ABOVE + V(e) ABOVE = % PERCENT of CDBG Net Construction Cost requested for resident inspection fees V(b) ABOVE + V(e) ABOVE % PERCENT of CDBG Net Construction Cost requested for preliminary engineering fees V(c) ABOVE + V(e) ABOVE - % CDBG-E-4 PROJECT IMPACT I, LEVERAGE A. PARTICIPATING PARTY LEVERAGE - Leverage provided from the funds of a Participating Party, including equity and loans, as reflected on CDBG-E--3(l), Sources and Uses of Funds; The fallowing establishes points for funds that will be expended by a Parlicipaling Party after the date of the site visit and prior to the submission of the administrative closeout. Tire funds may be In the form of cash, or from funds derived from loans to the Participating Paity directly related to the project. Funds roust bc: spent on activities at the job creation location of directly in support of chant -related activities at the job creation location. Only the initial amount of transient assets such as inventory, supplies, and working capital may be counted here. On-going cost of operation, such as payroll, inventory purchases, non - capitalized equipment, or other like expenses, may not he counted. Equity investment by a Participating Party roust be counted here. Participating Party Amount 1. CRA Care Centers, Inc. 5 1.500,000 2. 3. $ 4. $ 5. 6. $ TOTAL A. S 1.500-000 Score one point for each $10,000 in private funds used for leverage in TOTAL. A. (DO NOT ROUND UP). Score 150 150 rnaxinium DOCUMENTATION OF LEVERAGE IS CONTAINED IN APPENO_ IX A and PP NP X C CDOG-E-4 PROJECT IMPACT B. PUBLIC LEVERAGE, NON -LOCAL, SOURCES - Leverage from public funds including grants and loans from sources reflected on CDBG-E-3(1), Sources and Lases of Funds: The following establishes points far funds that have been contracted for or awarded to the local government from a loan fund or grant source other than CDBG, the local government, or a political subdivision of the local government, for complementary activities to be begun or completed during the term of the CDBG grant based upon the amount of that commitment. The funds must be used for CDBG eligible activities that enhance or expand the scope of the CDBG activities or project, are in direct support of the job creating entities, or are necessary for the completion of the proposed CDBG funded activities. In order to be awarded these points, the funds must have been awarded in writing to the local government from the loaning or granting entity prior to the application deadline dale. Additionally, the local government must agree to contract for the expenditure of the portion of those funds claimed for points. If bonds or other loan sources are to provide the funding, the bonds must be approved and ready to sell, or the loan must be fully approved, subject only to the receipt of CDBG or other federal funding. Those funds claimed for points in this section must be expended after the date of the site visit and prior to the date of the submission of the administrative closeout. Funds from grant or loan programs that utilize a pre -application or preliminary approval with a subsequent formal invitation to apply process, such as RD (formerly FmHA or RECD) or the U,S, Department of Commerce, Economic Development Administration (EDA), are eligible if no contract has been executed only if the local government can document the following: The local government has received a wrillen formal Invitation to apply or a preliminary approval within 12 months of the receipt date of the CD8G application and has executed an engineering contract for preparation of the preliminary engineering report and the project feasibility sludy; or \The local government has received a written formal invitation to apply or a preliminary approval no longer than 24 months prior to receipt of the CDBG application, has received notification that the grantor has accepted the preliminary engineering report and project feasibility study, the grantor has completed the environmental assessment, and the grantor has provided the local government with the documents to issue and publicize a finding of no significant impact. Funding Source Amount 1. $ 2. $ 3. $ 4. $ TOTAL B. $ Score one point for each $10,000 in granVIcan funds used for leverage in TOTAL B. (DON OT ROUND UP). Score _ - ONE ., 75 maximum NO POINTS ARE BEING CLAIMED FOR PUBLIC LEVERAGE. 15 C@BG.E 4 PROJECT IMPACT C. PUBLIC LEVERAGE, LOCAL SOURCES . Local government general revenue leverage contributions to the project from general revenue or enterprise accounts: The following establishes points for local governments that will commit to utilize additional, non -grant local government revenue or CDBG program income from a prior CDBG grant for complementary activities. undertaken during the term of this CDBG project, based upon the amount of that commitment, The funds must be expended for CDBG eligible activities that enhance or expand the scope of the CDBG activitles or project, The funds must be reflected on Farm CDBG -C•3(l) and be committed to the project in writing. Grants from any governmental or private agency, normal recurring governmental services or expenses, in-kind services, forgiven or deferred taxes, donations, or expenses that are maintenance in nature are not eligible. If bonds or other loan sources are to provide the funding, the bonds must be approved and ready to sell, or the loan must be fully approved, subject only to the receipt of CDBG or other federal funding. Waiver or payment of permit fees or normally charged impact fees amounts shall be eligible for scoring in this sect -roil. All costs related to grant application preparation for which CDBG reimbursement or payment is not sought shall be eligible for points in this section. Except for cost of audits and application preparation, all expenditures must take place after the dale of the site visit and prior to the submission of the administrative closeout package. Funding Source Amount 1. $ 2. S 3. 4. 5, $ TOTAL C. Score one point for each $10,000 in local government funds used for leverage in TOTAL C. (DO NOT ROUND UP). Scare NONE 75 maximum NO POINTS ARE BEING CLAIMED FOR PUBLIC LEVERAGE, LOCAL SOURCES. D7 TOTAL I(A) + I(B) + I(C) v Score --AL _ 150 maximum Though the total for I(A) + I(i3) + I(C) may exceed 150 points, the maximum scare that may be claimed is 150 points. 16 CDBG-c-4 PROJ'ECTIMPACT Ill. E N -LOANS QNLY - INVESTMENT RATIO AT JOB CREATION LOCATION: Calculate the ratio of CDBG loan funds requested by each borrowing Participating Party to all other private funds to be spent at that Parilcipating Party's Job creation location after the date of the site visit and prior to submission of the administrative closeout. Only funds reflected on Form C9BG-E4(I)(A) may be counted here. This calculation must be done only if any portion of the requested CDBG funds are for a loan of direct assistance to private for-profit entities, private non-profit entities, neighborhood based organizations, local development corporations, or other not for profit organizations. If CDBG funds being loaned to any Participating Party constitute more than 50°% of the total funds to be spent by the Participating Party at that Participating Party's job creation location, a 251 point reduction will be assessed in the project impact score, A. CD$G Funds Requested for a CDBG loan to a Participating Party (less CDBG Administration Request) $ 0 B. Total private funds to be spent at the job creation location by a Participating Party, the local government, or others: $x,509_0¢0 C, Private Investment Ratio [III(B) + III (A)] Carried to four decimal places = 2.17 If Ill (C) is .9999 or less score reduction = -251 points 0 251 Points If III(C) is 1,0 or greater, score reduction 3 zero points 0 0 Points TE: If there is more than one Participating Party subject to this section, a separate calculation must be done for each Participating Party. IV. OTHER COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITIES Points available below relale to the 'individual' local government or the "lead" local government in a joint application. Documentation should be included to justify the points claimed. A. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ELEMENT TO THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT COMPREHENSIVE P IAN OR Has the local government adopted an "Economic Development Element` to its Comprehensive Plan in conformance with Chapter 163, Florida Statutes? Yes x (20 points) No (0 points) Will the local government agree to adopt an 'Economic Oevelopmenl Element" to its Comprehensive Plan in conformance with Chapter 163, Florida Statutes, within 12 months of the Department's execution of a CDBG award agreement? (This is a non - amendable option and the Department will withhold funding should adoption be delayed beyond 12 months.) Yes— (20 points) Na_ (0 points) 18 score 20 POINTS MAXIMUM COBG-E-4 PROJECTIMPACT B, EMPOWERMENT ZONE, ENTERPRISE COMMUNITY, CHAMPION COMMUNITY, AREA OF CRITICAL STATE CONCERN, OR SUSTAINABLE COMMUNITY SCORE: 1. A. Has the local government been designated or applied to be an Empowerment Zone and Enterprise Community or Champion Community pursuant to the Economic Empowerment Act of 1993? —K— YES NO Ar B. Has any part of the local government's jurisdiction been designated as a state enterprise zone pursuant to Chapter 290.0065, Florida Statutes? _ --x YES NO And G. Excluding administration and design, are all proposed CDBG funded activities in this application included in the Strategic Plan that was prepared as part of the application process for the federal or state designation? _ x YES NO 91 2. Is the local government in a currently designated "Area of Critical State Concern' pursuant to Chapter 360.05, Florida Statutes? X YES NO or 3. Is the applying local government currently designated as a "Sustainable Community" pursuant to Chapter 163.3244, Florida Statutes? _ x YES NO If the local government answered "Yes" to question '1A" and/or question `18" and answered "Yes' to question '1C; or "Yes" to questions "2" or'3," score 10 points. Score 0 10 POINTS MAXIMUM 19 CDOG-E-4 PROJECTIMPACT C. APPLICATION WORKSHOP ATTENDANCE SCORE, A local government may claim 1.0 points for having a representative at all the daily sessions at the most recent annual CDBG application workshop or any additional CD$G economic development application workshop conducted before the application deadline for which this application is submitted. The representative must have registered each day. On the date attending, the representative must be one of the following;. • a local government elected official • a local government employee • a member of the local government's Citizens Advisory Task Force • a grant writer selected before the application workshop 1. If the local government is eligible for these points, enter the following: Category (local official, Name(s) of the Attendee(s) employee, CATF member, etc,) Peter Radke. County Employee 2. Enter the appropriate score; Score 10 10 Points Maximum D. WORK AND GAIN ECONOMIC SELF SUFFICIENCY (WAGES) IMPACT SCORE A. Participating Party agrees to hire at least one WAGES client as a full-time employee for a permanent job after the date of the site visit and prior to submission of the administrative closeout package. Participating Party Name YES (10 points) NO _x_ (0 points) TOTAL POINTS FOR OTHER COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITIES Score 0 10 Points Maximum 50 Points Maximum DOCUMENTATION OF OTHER COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITIES MUST BE INCLUDED IN APPENDIX C 20 CDOG-E-5 PROGRAM IMPACT SUMMARY FORM Instructions: Enter scores from PROJECT IMPACT (Form COBG•E-4) into the chart below: Measure and (Maximum Points) Points Scared t. LEVERAGE (150 MAXIMUM) Subscores A. Padicipaling Party Leverage (150) i50 B. Public Leverage, non -local sources (75) _0 C. Public Leverage, local sources (75) 0 150 150 Points Maximum it. JOB BENEFIT TO LMI PERSONS (450 MAXIMUM) A. Cost per FTE Job (150) 90 8. LMI Job Ratio (150) 156 C. FTE LMI Jabs CreatedlRetained (150) 454 Points Maximum III. FOR LOANS ONLY: SCORE REDUCTION FOR LESS THAN 50% INVESTMENT RATIO AT THE JOB CREATION LQCATtQN, IF APPLICABLE 0 -251 Faints Maximurin IV. OTHER COMMUNITY DE=VELOPMENT ACTIVITIES (50 MAXIMUM) A. Economic Development Element (20) �0 B. Empowerment or Enterprise Zone (10) C. Workshop Attendance (10) 1 D. WAGES Impact Score (10) 0 30 50 Paints Maximum TOTAL PROGRAM IMPACT SCORE 550 _ 650 Points Maximum A MINIMUM PROGRAM IMPACT SCORE OF 440 IS REQUIRED TO BE ELIGIBLE FOR FUNDING °`** RECORD THE TOTAL PROGRAM IMPACT SUMMARY SCORE ON CDBG-E-1 21 CDBG-E-Ii EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY AND FAIR HOUSING The purpose of this section is to calculate two scores: Equal Employment Opportunity Score; and, Fair Housing Score A maximum of 100 points is available for these scores. The local government must provide supporting documentation for any points claimed at the time of site visit. Outstanding Performance in Equal Employment opportunity Score. WAGES (Work and Gain Economic Selfvufficiency) Employment Score '7.5 Point Score' Score 25 points if the local government hired a WAGES client as a full time employee during the 12 month period prior to application deadline and that employee or their one for one Wages -client replacement continues to be employed on application deadline. A. Specify the title and date of hire of at least one WAGES client as a full time employee of the local government during the 12 month period prior to application deadline and show that employee or their one for one WAGES client replacement continuing to be employed on application deadline. Title Date of Hire Still employed at application deadline? X Yes No Score: 0 25 POINTS MAXIMUM Local Government Empinyment Score; The following requirements must be met when determining the local government employment data: Permanent full-time employment data includes only full -lime employees and part-time employees who receive benefits. This does not include elected officials. All part-time employees, who otherwise meet the definition of full-time employees, must be converted to full-time equivalents based upon the number of hours worked in an average week, with 40 hours per week equal to a full-time employee. For these calculations only, "within the County" includes the sum of the incorporated and unincorporated areas. (See Rule 98-43.003(24), Florida Administrative Code.) The Department provides this figure. Enter the appropriate data in sections '8' and 'C.' In section 'G,' indicate the appropriate score, based on sections'B' and 'C' and the following; '60 Point Score' Score 60 points if the percentage of permanent full-time and full-time equivalent minority employees equals or exceeds the percentage of minorities within the County, OR '44 Point Score' Score 40 points if the local government has three or fewer employees without regard Io full-time or part-time status, Og 22 CORG.E•6 EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY AND FAIR HOUSING 'Up to 40 Points Score" Score up to 40 points if the percentage of full -lime and full-time equivalent minority employees is less than the percentage of minorities within the county. If the minority employment percentage is 50% or higher, as a ratio to total minority population percentage within the county, one point will be awarded for each one percent above 50%. To calculate this score, complete the calculation in section "E." If the score is a negative number, enter "0. Up to a total of 60 points may be claimed for this score. Enter the appropriate score in sections "B" through "F' below: b. Calculate the local government percentage of minority employees: 52 717 7.25 TOTAL NUMBER OF PERMANENT TOTAL NUMBER OF PERMANENT LOCAL GOVERNMENT FULL. -TIME AND FULL-TIME FULL-TIME AND FULL-TIME PERCENTAGE OF MINORITY EQUIVALENT MINORITY LOCAL EQUIVALENT LOCAL EMPLOYEES GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES GO'V'ERNMENT EMPLOYEES C. Referring to the list provided by the Department, enter the percentage of minorities within the County: IZ04% D. Designate with an "X' the score that is appropriate: "60 Point Score" "40 Point Score" "Up to 40 Points Score' , x ,. E. If the "Up to 40 Points Score' is appropriate, complete the following equation: (-. -0.725 " . 04 ) _ (--6022,— X i00) =_GQ22 - 50 = ___Q,22__ Percentage of Percentage of 40 POINTS MAXIMUM minority employees minorities within the County F. Enter the appropriate score: Score: 10.22 60 POINTS MAXIMUM If. Outstanding Performance in Fair Housing Score. Up to a total of 15 points may be claimed for this score as follows: ■ Score 5 points if, before the application deadline, the local government adopters a Fair Housing Ordinance that covers all of the federally protected classes (race" color, familial status, handicap, national origin, religion, and sex). ■ Score 5 points If the local government conducted a training or educational program within twelve months before the application deadline date that meets all of the following conditions: Public notice was provided pursuant to Rule 98.43:003(49), Florida Administrative Code, For the general public; CDBG"E•6 EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY AND FAIR HOUSING • The session was conducted at a meeting of the local governing body and was designed for the general public and focal elected officials; • An agenda and training manuallmalerials were provided for the session; and • An attendance log was maintained_ ■ Score 5 points if the local government conducted a training or educational program within twelve months before the application deadline date that meets all of the following conditions: Notice was provided by mail or email to appropriate professionals and property owners; • The session was designed and conducted for professionals such as bankers, realtors, insurance agents, or property owners, agents, brokers, etc.; • An agenda and training manual/materials were provided for the session; and • An attendance Ing was maintained. If both "B" and "G" are claimed for points, the training and educational programs must be conducted at two different times. Documentation of the above must be available in the jurisdiction for review during the site visit. 'Local governments from within the same county who are applying for CDBG funding may elect to conduct Joint training sessions. ■ Enter the appropriate Outstanding Performance in Fair Housing Score on line D below. This score cannot exceed 15 points. Complete as applicable. A. Date of adoption of a Fair Housing Ordinance: 3-14-9 � (5 Points) B. Date of Training or Educational Program for the General Public and Local Elected Officials: --NA__ (5 Points) C. Date of Training or Educational Program for Professionals: NA (5 Points) D, Enter the appropriate score: Score: 5 15 Points maximum TRANSFER THESE SCORES TO FORM CDBG•C-1 Total Score of CDBG-E-6(1)A plus E -6(1)F plus E•${II}D. SCORE._15,22 100 Points Maximum RECORD TOTAL EEOIFAIR HOUSING SCORE ON FORM CDBG-E-1 ,4 CDBG.E-7 MAPS CHECKLIST All maps must be clearly legible and fulfill the following requirements - Map attached as page: t. JURISDICTION MAP (Attach copy) Appendix H (a) Contains a scale which is clearly marked on the map and contains a north arrow. (b) Displays boundaries of the jurisdiction. (c) Disptays boundaries of the project area or areas. (d) Include the appropriate legible names, streets, route numbers, or easily identifiable landmarks where the project area or areas are located. (e) Display the census tracts or block groups containing the jots creation location if a national objective is attained pursuant to 24 C.F.R. 570 Section 493(b)(4)(iv) or (v). ll. PROJECT AREA MAP(S) (Attach Copy) Appendix H (a) Contains a scale which is clearly marked on the map and contains a north arrow. (b) Display the location of all proposed participating parties, activities and major cost components of those activities. (c) Include the legible names, streets, route numbers, or easily identifiable landmarks where all activities are located. (d) Display any designated wetlands in the project area, (e) Designate on the map the location of any activities to be funded by a source other than CDBG. III. If applicable, a Floodplain Map displaying the location of the project Appendix tj� area as it relates to the 100•year floodplain. An enlarged portion or portions of the map must specifically locate all activities it any portion of the project is located in a flood -prone area. IV. Is the project of a size or magnitude which would require review under Chapter 390, Florida Statutes, which addresses requirements for a Development of Regional Impact? Yes No „_x_ MOTE: Failure to submit the required maps will result in a 25 point score reduction in accordance with Rule 08.43.006(3)(e),. Florida Administrative Code. DOCUMENTATION FOR MAPS I8 INCLUDED IN APPENDIX H 25 CDBG-E-8 HISTORIC PRESERVATION QUESTIONNAIRE A. Are there any structures, public. improvements, or planned open spaces to be affected by the proposed activities that are more than 50 years old? Yes No -,x The question should be answered 'yes' If: 1) The project or any activity will result in any direct physical change to structures that are more than 50 years old, including demolition (partial or complete), rehabilitation, restoration, remodeling, renovation, expansion, or relocation; 2) The project will result in direct physical change to public improvements that are more than 50 years old, such as stone curbs or brick streets, 3) The project Will result in direct physical change to planned open spaces (.e., park/ plaza) that are more than 50 years old; or 4) Project activities wilt occur within 100 feet of a structure, public Improvement, or planned open space that is more than 50 years old. NOTE: Projects or components thereof that affect properties that are listed or eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Ptaces shall be designed in accordance with the recommended approaches in the Secretary of the Interior's Standards or Rehabilitation Guidelines for Rehabilitating Historic Buildings (U.S, Department of the Interior, National Park Service, 1983). Copies of this publication and technical assistance regarding the application of these Standards and Guidelines to specific projects may be obtained from the State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) at the address on page 1 of the Application Deadline and Instructions. Local governments with proposed activities affecting structures, public improvements, and planned open spaces that are more than 50 years old are encouraged to contact the SHPO as soon as possible in the project planning process, a. What kinds of activities are included in the project? 1) New building construction: Yes X No 2) Building rehabilitation: Yes No 3) Building demolition: Yes No 4) Water and sewer systems: Yes x No 5) Acquisition: Yes x No 6) Sidewalks or landscaping Yes x No 7) Other (describe): C. Does the service area rnap reflect the location of all affected historical buildings, planned open spaces, or public improvements? Yes x No (there are no affected historical buildings) ^e, • C_ J • CDBG-E-8 HISTORIC PRESERVATION QUESTIONNAIRE jCONTINUEDj D. For each structure, planned open space, or public improvement that is more than 50 years old, which will be affected by this project, please provide to the SHPO ardginal photographs (not xerographic copies) for review to assist In determining their historiclarchilectural significance, Submit photographs depicting each side of the structure (where possible) and general views showing the affected property in its surroundings, The photographs should be identified by street address and should be keyed to the service area map, If potentially significant historic properties are identified, the State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) will recommend appropriate treatment. E. List of identified buildings, public improvements, or planned open spaces (hat are more than 50 years old, (Attach an additional sheet if necessary) NA ADDRESS CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY DATE 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7, r 8. 9. 19. 11. 12. 13. 14, F. Has there been any pre -application discussion with the SHPO in reference to the possible effect of the proposed project on historic properties? Oeschhe the results of this discussion below and attach any related correspondence as Appendix None THERE ARE NO HISTORIC PRESERVATION ISSUES, THEREFORE NO DOCUMENTATION IS REQUIRED 1' CABG -E-9 ASSURANCES, CERTIFICATIONS AND SIGNATURES By signature of this application, the local government hereby assures and certifies that It will comply with the following applicable federal and state requirements; I . Inform affected person or their rights arta the policies set forth in 49 C.F.R. Parl 24 and 24 C.F.R. Chapter 570:602(b); 2. Florida Small and Minordy Business Act, s.288.702.288.714, F.S. 3. Florida Coastal Zone Protection Act, s. 161,52-16158, F.S., 4. Local Government Comprehensive Planning and Land Dovelopmenl Regulation Act, Chapter 163, F.S.; 5. National Environmental Policy Ad of 1969 and other provisions of law vhic!f further the purposes of this Act; 6. National HWonc Preservation Act of 5966 (Public law 89-M5), as amended and Protection of Historic Properties (24 C.F.R. Part 800); 7. Preservalicn or Archaeological and Historical Oala Act of 19.x,6; a. Executive 0(der 11593 - Protection and Enhancement of Cultural Envkonmenl; 9, Reservoir Salvage Act; 10. Sale DdnlaYig Water Act of 1974, as amended; 11. Endangered Species Act of 1958, as amended; 12. ExerxvM Order 12898 - Environmental Juslice 13. Executive Order 71968 and 24 C.F.R. Part 55 - Floodplain Management; 14. The Federal Water Pollution Conlrol Ael of 1972, as amended (33 U.S.C., s. 1251 et. seq.): 15. Executive Order 11990 - Protection of Wetlands; 16. Coastal Zone Management Act of 1%8. as amended; 17. Wild and Scenic Rivers Act of 1968, as amended; 18. Clean Air Ad of 1977; 19, HUD Environmental Standards (24 C.F.R. Part 58); 20. Farmland Protection Policy Ad of i98i; 21. Idle I of the Housing and Communrty Development Act of 1974, as amended; 22, The Clean Water Ad or 1977; 23. Dayis-Bacon Act-. 24, Contract Wane Hours and Safety Standards Act of 1962, 40 U.S.C. s. 327 e1. seq.; 25. The Wildlife Coordination Ad of 1958, as amended; 26. The Sdrd Waste Disposal Act, as amended by the Resource Conservalion and Recovery Act of 1975 (42 U.S.C., s. 6901 el. seq ); 27.. Noise Abatement and ControlDepartmental Policy Implerrwntstion, Responsibilities, and Standards, 24 C.F,R. Part 51, Subpart B; 28. Flood Disaster Protection Act of 1973, P.L. 92.234; 29. Protection of Historic and Cultural Propenes under HUD Programs, 24 C. F. R. Part 59; 30. Coastal Zone Management Act of 1972, P. L. 92.583; 31. Arehiilecturai and Constnclion Standards; 32. Arch4cctural Barriers Act of 1968, 42 U.S.C. 4151; 33 Execulne Order 11296, relating to evaluation or flood hazards, 1%, 34, Executive Order 11288, retating to the prevention, control end abalemenl of water pollution; 35. Cost-EffeclW Energy Conservation Standards, 24 C.F.R. Part 39 36 Section 8 Existing IInsing 0uaiity Standards, 24 C.F.R. Part 882; 37. Coastal Barrier Resources Act of 1982; 38 Federal Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C., a. 201 at, a".,- 39. Title N of the CMI Rights Act of 1964 -N ; 40. Trite V11I of the Civil Rights Act of 1968 - NorWEscidraination in Housing; 41. Age Discrimination Act of 1975; 42. Executhm Order 12692 - Fair Housing; 43. Section 109 of the Housing and Commun4 Development Act of 1974, Noncliscriminaton; 44. Section 504 of the Relhabifitation Act of 1973 and 24 C.F.R. Part B; 45. Executive Order 11063 - Equal Opportunity In, Hautsing; 46. Executive Order 11246 - Non-discrimination; 47. Section 3 of the Housing and Urban Developrrlerli Ad of 1968, as amended - EmploymenliFraining of Louver Income Residents and Locat Business Contracting; 48, Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Properly Acquisition Policies Act of 1970. P.L. 100-17, and 49 C.F.R. Part 24; 49 Copeland Anti-IGcirback Ad of 1934; 50. Hatch Act; 51. Title IV Lead. Based Paint Poisoning Prevention Ad (42 U.S.C., s. 1251 et. seq.); 52. OMB Circulars A-87, A-171, and A-128, as revised; 53. Treasury Circular 1075 regarding drawdown of CDBG funds: 54. Single Audit Act or 1964; 55. Administrative Requirements for Granls, 24 C.F.R. Per185; 56. Section 102 of the Department of Housing and Urban Devetapment Reform Act of 1969 and 24 C.F.R. Part 12; The iocat government will also: 1 Affirmativety further Fair Housing by undertaking one Fair Housing activity each year, 2 Minimize displacement, 3 Submit informatloo to Its Regional Planning Council as appropriate to satisfy the Intergovernmentat Coordination and Review (ICBR) requirements; and 4 Not attempt to recover through special assessments capital costs of the public improvements assisted in whole or In part with CABG funds unless otherwise authorized by 24 C.F.R. Section 570.482 and Section WIb)(5) of Toile I of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974. CDI33-E-9: ASSURANCES, CERTIFICATIONS AND SIGNATURES (CONTINUED) By signature of this application, the focal government certifies that the following statements are true and the documentation is on file with the local government and available for public Inspection. Title I of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974, as amended, requires this. The Department may request copies of some of these items if questions arise during the site visit. These materials must be available in the following order in a three -hole punched binder at the time of the site visit. The local govemment must maintain this binder if the Department awards a grant to the local government. This binder will become part of the permanent CDBG records. Any changes made after the site visit must be incorporated into the binder. Instructions: The local government applicant must answer the following questions and complete the requested information as appropriate. Department staff will use the column to the left during the site visit. DCA USE COMPLETE AS ONLY REQUIREMENTS INDICATED CITIZEN PARTICIPATION REQUIREMENTS: We have met the following citizen participation requirements according to Section 290.046, Florida Statutes and Rule 913-43.006(2)(1), Florida Administrative Code: We have adopted a Citizen's Participation Plan that meets the requirements specified in Section 104(a)(3) of Title I of 3-14-95 _ Date of Adoption the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974: We have appointed a Citizen's Advisory Task Force (CATF) composed of citizens residing in this local government's jurisdiction. This CATF provided input into the application x and will continue to provide input into the CDBG program if Yes No funded. The CATF held a meeting relating to this grant application on the following date: 4119199 Date The minutes of the first CATF meeting relating to the grant application are available for review. x Yes No We met the needs of non-English speaking residents at public hearings when a significant number of non-English speaking residents participated. N/A --&-_ Yes No We held at least two public hearings. x Yes No The purpose of the first meeting was to obtain the views of the citizens concerning community x development needs. Yes No The purpose of the second meeting was to obtain the views of citizens concerning the final application to be x submitted to the Department. Yes No 29 10 CDBG-E-9; ASSURANCES, CERTIFICATIONS AND SIGNATURES JCONTINUED) DCA USE ONLY COMPLETE AS REQUIREMENTS INDICATED At least five days before the first public hearing, we published, in a newspaper of general circulation in the jurisdiction, the amount of funds available for various �X activities and the range of activities that we may undertake. Yes No Date that we published the notice of the first public hearing: i-13-99 Publication Date Date of the first public hearing: 1-19-99 _ Public Hearing Date The five-day provision is correct. x Yes No We published, in a newspaper of general circulation in the jurisdiction, a summary of the proposed application. We published this summary at least five days before a second public hearing in which we gave the citizens an opportunity to x examine a draft of its contents and submit comments. Yes No— Date that we published the notice of the second public hearing: —,4/13199 Publication Date Date of the second public hearing: 4120199, Public Hearing Date The five-day provision is correct. x Yes No We considered comments expressed by the citizens at the public hearing concerning the proposed application. NIA__x Yes No We modified the proposed application based on the comments, NIA Yes No We have developed and adopted a Community Development Plan that identifies our community development and housing needs, In accordance with the primary objective of Title I of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974, it specifies both short and long-term community development objectives. That objective is to develop viable urban communities by providing decent housing, a suitable living environment, and expanding economic opportunities, principally for persons of low and moderate income. OR ... Adoption Date COBG-E-9: ASSURANCES, CERTIFICATIONS AND StGF4_ATURES f CON rrr vimn% 10 DCA USE ONLY REQUIREMENTS COMPLETE AS INDICATED Instead of the above, we have designated our Comprehensive Plan, adopted pursuant to Chapter 163, Florida Statutes, as our Community Development Plan. 4120199 _ Designation Date We have adopted an Anti -Displacement and Relocation Policy in conformance with the Unifor n Revocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1979, as amended, 49 C.F.R. Part 24, and 24 C.F.R. Section 570.606, _ 3-14-95 Adoption Date Copies of letters verifying that we have submitted information, as required, to the Regional Planning Council, Bureau of Historic_ I Preservation, andlor the Stale Clearing House are on file. Yes No We have adopted a Citizen's Complaint Policy Haat requires written answers to written complaints and grievances within 15 working days. Adoption Date All proposed activities are in conformance with our Comprehensive Plan. x Yes Na We have adopted a local procurement policy that conforms to the following state and federal regulations: 24 C.F.R. Section 135.36; Section 287.055, Florida Statutes; and, Rule 9B-43, Florida Admini tra i e Code. 5120197 Adoption Date We have adopted a fair housing ordinance that references the classes of individuals protected by the Fair Housing Act, 42 U.S.G. 3601-20 and 24 C.F.R. Part 700, {race, color, familial status, handicap, national origin, sex, and religion}, 3_14 95 Adoption Date We have adopted an Affirmative Action Plan that includes procedures for hiring minority contractors and goals for hiring minority employees. _ 3-14-95 Adoption Date We have documentation to verily the 'Cost Standard Used' to estimate costs in this application. x No Yes We have evidence that we or another named provider has sufficient sewage treatment plant rapacity and/or potable water plant capacity to provide an adequate level of service to the project area and to the Participating Party or parties at the level of operational activity and employment proposed in the application. x i 'Yes No CDBG-E-9: ASSURANCES, CERTIFICATIONS AND SIGNATURES (CONTINUED) 1, the undersigned, certify the following: all citizen participation requirements have been met; • the local government will affirmatively further fair housing; • the local government's CDBG program will be conducted in conformity with the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Fair Mousing Act; • the local government will not attempt to recover capital cost of public improvements constructed with CDBG funds; • a Community Development Plan has been developed; any surveys of service areas to document LMl benefit have been properly conducted; • an Anti -Displacement and Relocation Plan has been adopted and displacement of persons will be minimized; • to the best of my knowledge and belief, data in this application are true and correct; • submission of the application has been duty authorized by the governing body of the local government; and • all site visit documentation referenced in the instructions is on file and readily accessible to Department of Community Affairs personnel. CERTIFICATION OF ON-TIME PERFORMANCE: 1, the undersigned, certify the following: —�— Our local government does not have an open Community Development Block Grant and is eligible to apply for this grant category pursuant to Rule 96.43.004, Florida Administrative Code. Q:a Our local government is the Recipient of a Community Development Block grant that is not administratively closed out and that grant is on schedule pursuant to Rule 913-43.0114, Florida Administrative Code. By signature of this page, the local government certifies that, based on the work plans and the other requirements in the contract, the following open CDBG contracts were on schedule as of thirty days before the date of the application deadline: C0BG {Grant # (1 C0BG Grant # i? CDBG•E-9: ASSURANCES, CERTIFICATIONS AND SIGNATURES (CONTINUED) SIGNATURES Application is hereby made for a Community Development Block Grant under Title I of the Housing and Community development Act of 11874, as amended, Rule 813-43, Florida Administrative Code, and Section 244.045, Florida Statutes. Me, the undersigned chief elected official or authorized representative of the local government, certify that submission has been duly authorized by the governing body of the jurisdiction, and the local government will comply with the certifications and assurances contained in this application if assistance is approved. By signature of this application, the local government hereby assures and certifies that it will comply with the ag icable federal and state requirements listed on this form in the administration of its Florida Small cities C —unity Development Block Grant Program. d��/hall! F} � x1114 "ofected fficial or DesiWe Title mate {At e3ti R sol t�on�as A�g�end ] �1 Jai Signbture of A plication Prepbrer if other than a local f arisdiction employee Andy Easton. Berryman & Henioar Typed Name and Name of Firm or Agency Failure to submit this page by the application deadline, completed and signed by the Chief Elected Official or another official designated by ordinance or resolution of the governing body, will result in a 50 -paint penalty being assessed against this application. This penalty cannot be eliminated during the completeness process. 13 CDBG-E-10 SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION THAT MUST 13E SUBMITTED WITH THE APPLICATION The local government shaIt submit or cause to be submitted Parts A-] of the documentation listed below (and detailed on the following pages) with the Application or the Application will be returned to the local government for completion and resubmission. These skibmissions must be included In an Appendix. Appendix IF THERE IS MORE THAN ONE PARTICIPATING PARTY, APPE=X F MUST BE SUBDIVIDED BY PARTICIPATING PARTY (note: there is only one participating party) M Documentation A. Local Govemment Commitment Letter(s) Appendix A B. Local Government Documentation For Infra,lructuro Projects OnlyN2LAPP—fiC2k!A-- C. Other Jurisdictional Activity triformation Not Applicable D. Initial Participating Party Commitments _Appendix -Q_ E. Business Plan Appen iN F. Participating Party(s) Current Employee Information (if Applicable) Appendix K G. Partierpating Party(s) Proposed New Job Creation Information _Appendix K H. Commitment of Non-CDBG Funds (by Local GovenlTnenl) Not Applicable I. Financial Information on Participating Parties for vehom a CDBG Loan is Proposed Appen-ft-F IF THERE IS MORE THAN ONE PARTICIPATING PARTY, APPE=X F MUST BE SUBDIVIDED BY PARTICIPATING PARTY (note: there is only one participating party) M BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS 1840 25th Street, Yarn Beech, F7oriwa 32960 Talephone; 1561) 567.8000 April 13. 1999 Mr. Rick Stauts, Planning Manager Bureau of Community Development Department of Community Affairs 2555 Shumard Oak Boulevard Tallahassee, Florida 32399-2100 Re: ITEM A. LOCAL GOVERNMENT COMMITMENTS As required by Form CDBG-E-14, item "A" of the Community Development Block Grant - Economic Development Category Application, Indian River County provides the following explanations and commitments for its proposed CDBG-ED project. ITEM A. LOCAL GOVERNMENT COMMITMENTS 1. Provide from each local government involved in the application, a. A clear statement of the scope and nature of the project as it relates to its commitment; Project Description The Indian River County Board of County Commissioners (the grant applicant) is applying for a $750,000 CDBG 'grant that will fund a low-interest loan that will be provided to CRA Care Centers, Inc. The loan will he used as partial funding of an Assisted Living Facility (ALF) to be owned and operated by CRA Care Centers, Inc. Other project finding sources include owner equity and a loan from a commercial lending institution. According to CRA Care Centers, Inc., obtaining financing for the full project cost was not possible, and sufficient owner equity was not available to cover the balance of the project costs. Thus, the CDBG-ED loan will be used as gap financing. Also, in order to be financially feasible, the CDBG-ED loan will need to be at an interest rate of 4% with a 20 year repayment period for the building; and 7 years for the furnishings and equipment. The commercial and CDBG-ED loans will fund construction of a 42,500 square foot ALF building with associated parking;, landscaping and waterlsewerconnections, and the purchase of ALF furnishings, fixtures and equipment, The project site is located in unincorporated Indian River County, north of CR 510, cast of 666 Avenue, west of W Avenue, and south of the city limits of Sebastian. The site is zoned for residential use with an assisted care facility spi-cihically allowed as a Special Exception We. The ALF will be located on two adjoining; parcels of land that total approximately 22 acres. The site is Currently not served by seg%er facilities. The uawr line servins* tate site is Page 2 a dead end line and consequently not sufficient to provide the fire flow needed for the facility's sprinkler system. Indian River County will fund the construction of the water and sewer lines needed to serve the site through a Developers Agreement with CRA Carecenters, Inc.. Because the wastewater force main needed for this project is in the County's capital improvement plan, the Board of County Commissioners approved Developers Agreement ►will provide for reimbursement of all costs incurred by CRA for the sewer line extension except the line extension (assessment) charge for 674 linear feet of sewer line adjacent to the CRA property on 66th Avenue. CRA shall bear the cost of looping the water line approximately 1,500 linear feet, from an existing water main on CR 510, north to an existing water main near the intersection of 66'" Avenue and Barber Street. This cost will be paid by CRA Care Centers, Inc. as par of its loan arrangements. The total ALF project cost is estimated at $5,319,885. Funding sources and amounts include 5690,000 as a CDBG-ED loan to CRA Care Centers, $4,279,860 as a commercial lending institution loan to CRA Care Centers, Inc. and up to $350,025 owner equity. owner equity funds will be used for operating deficits and for loan and broker fees, to be spent after the date of grant award, and also include costs already paid (such as land binder fees, market study, and survey). Please note that this is an estimate and that actual amount of owner equity may change. For grant scaring purposes, CRti Care Centers, Inc. is claiming oniv ,51,500,000from the commercial lending institution loan as private leverage, because that is the maximum amount for which application points can be claimed. CRA estimates that, within 24 months of grant award, the ALF will be at 50% capacity and that at a minimum 26 jobs will have been created. Within 30 months of grant award, the ALF will beat full capacity with 35 full time equivalent jobs anticipated. Forgrani scoring purposes, CRA is committing to create 26 jabs within two years ofgrant award. At the time of hiring, at least 51% of the new employees (14) will be from low to moderate income households as defined by HUD income limits. Also, all low to moderate income jobs offered will be available to persons with a high school education. The ALF will provide care levels from nearly independent to extended care which involves some skilled nursing. Also, dementia care (Alzheimer's and other types of dementia) will be provided in a separate, secured, specially designed part of die building. Commitments ,From CR.•# Care Centers, Inc. Act as a CDBG-ED "Participating Party," Invest up to 5350,025 as owner equity for ALF operating deficits and other soft costs. Obtain a $4,279,860 loan from a commercial lending institution to be used for ALF construction and start-up activities. only $1,5o0,0U0 of this loan will be used as leverage for grant scoring purposes. Use $690,000 in the form of a low interest (4%) loan from the C DBG•ED program as partial funding for construction of the ALF. Page 3 For grant scoring purposes, create at least 26 lae'v jobs within two years of grant award. At least l4 jobs (51 %) will be made available to persons who are from low to moderate income households at the date of hiring. CRA Care Centers, Inc. is expected to create up to 35 new jobs, but only 26 will be counted for grant scoring purposes. Locate an ALF facility and begin operations of the facility on tile project site located in unincorporated Indian River County, north of CR 510, east of 660' Avenue, west of 64th Avenue, and south of the city limits of Sebastian. The project site is identified on the County tax roles with the following identification numbers: #29-31-39-00000-3000-00003.0 and 29- 31-39-00000-3000-00008.o. Commitments From Indian Ricer County Act as the grant "Recipient," requesting $750,000 in grant funds to fund a CDBG-ED assisted ALF project to be located in unincorporated Indian River County, Provide a CDBG-ED funded low-interest loan to CRA Care Centers, Inc. in the amount of 5690,000. The loan will be used as gap Financing for the ALF and as a low-interest loan to make the project Financially feasible, Maintain public water and sewer lines serving the Ai_F site, Conform to all CDBG grant requirements. Erasure the ALF project is in conformance with County Comprehensive Plan and zoning requirements. Ensure there is adequate waterIsewer capacity to serve the site. The wastewater force main extension is in the County's capital improvement plan, and the water line requires only looping to increase fire flow. b. A statement of its willingness to expend the non-CDBG funds that are referenced For points in the application or are required for successful completion or the project; Indian River County is not committing to spend any non-CDBG funds for scoring purposes in the grant application. e• That all activities conform 10 local zoning requirements and are in conformance Willi the most recently adopted Comprehensive Plan; The County certifies that all activities proposed in the grant application conform to local zoning requirements and are in conforniance with the most recently adopted comprehensive plan (see Appendix G of the grant application). It should be noted [hat the proposed ALD' site is zoned RM -6, Multiple Family Residential District (up to 6 units/acre), a zoning district which allows an ALF of this size as a special exception use by the County's Zoning Code. The County is currently coordinating with CRA Care Centers to ensure that all Special Page 4 Exception use requirements will be met. 4o CDBG-'ED funds will be spent until the special exception use has been approved by the Board of County Commissioners (see Appendix G of the Grant Application). d. That, unless it is being provided as part of the project, there Is sufficient potable water capacit and sewage plant capacity to provide adequate service to the site where the Participating Party will locate, at the projected levels of employment, operational activity, and customer usage; Indian River County certifies that there is sufficient water and sewer capacity to serve the site where the participating party will locate at the projected levels of employment, operational activity and customer usage as of the date of the Agreement. Until adequate capacity charges have been paid by CRA Care Centers, Inc., there is no guarantee that there will be capacity available at the time of connection. It should be noted, however, that the County does have available water and sewer capacity as shown by the documentation contained in Appendix G of the Grant Application. Also, it is the County's normal procedure to caonstruet water and sewer line extensions to serve new development using the Board of County Commissioners approved Developers Agreement process. This process requires the Developer to construct the water and sewer lines and then seek reimbursement from the County. As part of the Developers Agreement process, the developer will be required to obtain at least three bids for the project. The county will reimburse the developer based on the lowest bid submitted for the project. It should also be noted that it is the County's normal procedure to reimburse the Developer using the "draw" process. In practice, this means that funds flow from the County to the Developer who then pays the contractor as applicable sections of mains are constructed and accepted by the county. Since County funds flow immediately to the contractor, the Developer can avoid the extra cost of obtaining a loan to finance the water and sewer line extension project. CRA Care Centers, Inc. will have water extension costs that will not be reimbursed, and an assessment for the wastewater line. These water and wastewater costs shall be paid for with commercial loan funds. e. Any commitment made to a Participating Party, individual, business entity, or another local government, other than potential CDHG assistance, as an. inducement for their participation in the project; Indian River County has not made any commitment to any Participating Party, business entity or another local government, other than the potential CDBG assistance, as an inducement for their participation in the project. What, if any, displac€went or relocation of homeowners, tenants, businesses, or others will take place as a result of the project. If displacement or relocation will take place, provide a copy of the notice(s) provided to any potential displacee or relocatee pursuant to the Uniform Act and as illustrated In HUD Handbook 1378, Appendices 2 thru 7; and There wiil be no displacement as a result orthis CDBG-ED project. Page 5 g. The basis for any determination that a national objective will be attained under the provisions of 24 C.F.R. Section 570.483(b)(4)(iv) or (v), if appropriate. The national objective is benefit to low and moderate income persons. This project will result in the creation of at least 26 jobs, of which 14 (51%0) will be made available to low to moderate income (LMI) persons. Please note that up to 35 new jobs are expected to be created and well over 51%of these jobs will be made available to LMI persons. Far grant scoring purposes, CRA Care Centers, Inc. is committing to creating only 26 new jobs. All LMI jobs to be created will be readily available to persons with a high school education. According to CRA Care Centers, Inc., the jobs cannot be created without the provision of the CDBG assisted loan. The Department may require a statement of commitment from any other entity whose participation is necessary for the successful completion of the project. Indian River County's grant consultant will cooperate with the Department to obtain any other statements of commitment from any other entity whose participation is necessary for the successful completion of the project.. 3. Document Project Costs a. If real property is being acquired, Include copies of property tar statements, disinterested third party appraisals, an appraisal from a certified appraiser, or some other determination of value that documents that the proposed purchase price is based on the fair market value of the property; This proposed CDBG-ED project does include property acquisition (see Appendix B of the Grant Application). however, CDBG fiords will not be used to finance the land acquisition. b. If building construction or rehabilitation is proposed, include cost estimates from a general contractor, engineer, or architect, or from a recently completed similar facility; See attached letter (Appendix B of the Grant Application) from the project architect and engineer. C. If acquisition of new or used machinery and equipment is proposed, include cost estimates from a possible vendor or invoices from prior recent acquisitions; See Appendix B of the Grant Application d. If acquisition of used machinery or equipment is proposed from other than a normal vendor, Include a disinterested third party appraisal demonstrating the current value; and The Participating Party does not anticipate the acquisition of used machinery or equipment from any source other than a normal vender. Page 6 If you ha�,e any additional questions or comments, please call Peter Radke, the county's economic development planner, at (561 ) 567.8000, extension 1243. Sisk y, t ?Z� '. th R, 'Vlacht Chairman, Indian River County Board of County Commissioners FURNISHINGS AND EQUIPMENT ESTIMATED NEEDS AND COSTS THREE PALMS ALF FURNISHINGS & EQUIPMENT NEEDS & COSTS ITEM N @ $ TOTAL FURNISHINGS Dining Room Table and 4 chairs 18 $800.00 $14,400.04 ServinV, carts 2 $300.00 $600.00 Living/Activity, and TV Rooms $0,00 Sofas 4 $800.00 $3,200.00 Chairs 24 $300.00 $7,200.00 End Tables l0 $200.00 $2,000.00 Bookcases 6 $300.00 $1,800.00 Tetevisions 3 $600.00 $1,800.00 Television stands 3 $250.00 $750.00 Piano 1 $2,500.00 $2,500.00 Table and 4 chairs (activity & snacks) 7 $700.00 $4,900.00 Fatruly dining set 1 $1,500.00 $1,500.00 Outdoor table & chair sets 7 $150.00 $1,050.00 Beauty Shap $0.00 Styling chair 1 $500.00 $500.00 Side chairs 2 $150.00 $300.00 Dryer, accessories 1 $500.00 $500.00 Offices, Assistant Station $0.00 Desks 4 $650.00 $2,600,00 Desk chairs 4 $250.00 $1,000.40 Side chairs 6 $150.00 $900.00 Conference table, four chairs 1 $1,2€10.00 $1,200.00 File cabinets 6 $250.00 $1,500.00 lc Computer stations 4 $400.00 '$1,640.40 Employee Loungt $0,00 Chairs & ottomans 2 $300.00 $604.00 Table and 4 chairs 1 $600.04 $640.00 Microwave oven 1 $300.00 $300,00 Refrig, rator 1 $300.00 $700.00 Lockers 24 $3,000,00 Outdoor $0.40 DECORATOR ITEMS $0.00 Window treatments, public spaces 10 $500.00 $5,000.00 Window treatments, resident rooms 67 $120.00 $8,040,00 OFFICE EQUIPMENT $0.00 Computers, monitors, keyboards 4 $2,500.00 $10,000.00 Printers 3 $500.00 $1,500.00 Software 4 $200.00 $800.00 Facsimile 1 $700.00 $700.00 Calculators, desk accessories, boards, etc 4 $420,00 $1,680.00 Copier 1 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 Telephone system, with 10 phones 1 $2,500.00 $2,500.40 Video camera, VCRITV 1 $1,500,00 $1,504.00 MEDICAL EQUIPMENT $0.00 Blond pressure & pulse monitors 1 $400.00 $900.00 Scale 1 $350.00 $350.00 Resident alert system units 70 $200.00 $14,000.00 Medicine cart 1 $400.00 $400.00 KITCHEN EQUIPMENT $000 Pots, pans, knives, utensils 1 set $2.500.00 $2,50000 Steam table, fryer, warmer, microwave, etc 1 each $1.00000 55,000 00 Trays, tea urns, pitchers, etc. Mixer, blender, coffee maker, slicer, etc. Transport cart for dementia unit (heated) Carts for walk-in refrigerator LAUNDRYfHOUSEKI EPLNG EQUIPMENT Washers (commercial) 1 $500.00 5 $300.00 1 $5,000.00 3 $400.00 6 $850.00 $500.00 $1,500.00 $5,000.00 $1,200.00 $0.00 $5,100.00 Dryers (commercial) 6 5850.00 $5,100.00 Laundry carts 4 $250.00 $1,000.00 Ironing station 1 $100.00 $100.00 Housekeeping carts 2 $300.00 $600.00 VaCuur{; cleaner 2 $500.00 $1,000.00 Maps, buckets, brooms, etc. 3 each $50.00 $150.00 MAINTENANCE EQUIIPMENT $0.00 Mower, trimmer, blower, edger 4 $300 av $1,200.00 Ladder, wheel barrow, hose, cart, etc. 1 set $700.00 $700.00 Took drill, hammer, pliers, shovel, etc. 1 set $500.00 $500.00 SOCIAL ACTIVITIES $0.00 Miscel€aneous iters (crafts, etc.) 1 set $500.00 $500.00 INITIAL SUPPLIES $0.00 Office 1 $600.00 $600.00 Housekeeping, laundry 1 $400.00 $400.00 Kitchen supplies, food (required for license) 1 $1,000.00 $1,000.00 RESIDENT RENTALS $0.00 Dresser, mirror sets 4 $800.00 $3,200.00 Nightstands 4 $300.00 $1,200.00 Lamps 4 $100.00 $400.00 Chairs 4 $250.0u 51,000.00 Tables 4 $200.00 $800.00 Bedspreads, blankets, pillows, pads 4 $100.00 $400.00 Twin beds, bedding 4 $600.00 $2,400.00 Telephones 4 $25.00 $100.00 Televisions, stands d $600.00 $2,400.00 Accessories 4 '$120.00 $480.00 SubTOTAL $155,400.04 TOTAL with 7% tax $166,278.00 NOTE: THE EXACT PURCHASE'S WILL BE DETERMINED BY THE ADMINISTRATOR AND MANAGEMENT CONSULTANT WHEN THE BUILDING CONSTRUCTION IS NEAR COMPLETION. THIS IS A PRELIMINARY LIST WHICH INDICATES A MINIMUM OF $140,040 IN CDBG-ELIGIBLE EXPENSES, CRA RECOGNIZES THAT SOME EXPENSES ARE NOT ELIGIBLE FOR CDBG FUNDS. This list was prepared by Deborah Roumelis, President, Roumelis Planting and Development Services, Inc.. ,a-iae- I Y Y : Y eAt«t P 'kill LUN"i r- w+xr u�hrwr r �a Y a slEeob r, s .. •. � ..., • �...« �' »,radW."ril}:iEtY6�3ec a ... "rrii�d[x�: [seri ao�:7lerf ..�.. . _ .. . �� .. • .... .. . "'iVliE�bf11.,..:,<.:..... _ r ^(¢blg�t{,�65• .. ... ...��. .... .,.. ,.. �.. .. .. ,. ^. IIFtUIfI��YtRdF�1��IkiE10R QESICi:q_ :.. ...e ...•. •. „. i D NAHUE & compony,,„r • April 2, 19199 Mr. William M. Clark, President CIA Care Cenws,, Inc. 1933 Commonwealth bane Tallahamee, FL 32303 bear Mr. Clark As we recently discussed, it is my opinion that an assisted living facility desigacd to serve approximately 70 residents can be designed for approximately 42,504 square feet..A good price range for the type of building you need is $68474 per square foot. Site development cosh ere likely to cost around $244,404. Perinits, c4unection fees and other casts for off site utilities would be in addition to these dollar atnountS- I am basing this statement on recently constructed projws I have done in Florida, and my knowledge of the Indian River County marked. I am also considering; our conversations regarding your intended facility program and its acceptance in thq, local Market. We will be developing a more firm cost estimate as we complete the project design, and will negotiate with competent builders to obtain a quality building at a reasonable price Sincerely, DONAHUE & COMPANY, NC. Kevin Donahue, AIA President Received: 04/02/99 10.27.26 From: 5613922265 i 11 • April 1, 1999 Mr. William H. Clark, President CRA Care Centers, Inc, 1933 Commonwealth Lane Tallahassee, Florida 32303 RE: Three Palms of Sebastian ALF Site Development Costs Dear Mr. Clark: The following cost items appear to be neccessary and appropriate for the site of CRA Care Center, Jnc.'s proposed 42.500 square foot assisted living facility, to be located in Indian River County, adjacent to the City of Sebastian. Parking, drive $40,000 Walkways $ 4,000 Drainage $20,000 Interior util $10,000 Lill; station $80,000 per Indian River County specifications for maintenance Clear, grade $20,000 Plants, sod $45,000 Lighting; $10,000 Sign $ 2,000 Irrigation $14,000 fence3$ 5,000 TOTAL $280,000 We will further refine this estimate of costs when the site plan is finalized and approved by Indian River County. Sincerely, Lam` Joe Miller, P.E. CRA Engineering, Inc. 1933 CCJmmanweelth L, -int. 7,41ahossee, Florida 37303 IM501 `574 1514 rAX- 18501 ;14 1641 370 VWIIIJOI)IM] LoOp. Swle I t''Tr1 A4ipn-agile Sptlrnrjs. Fku1,1i #11111 -101 1"1 1'_45 FAX 1401 3;N, 14ly' CI C-1 0 CRA Care Centers, Inc. 1933 Commonwealth Lane Tallahassee, Florida 32303 April 2, 1999 Mr. Kenneth Macht, Chair Indian River County Board of County Commissioners 1840 251h Street Vero Beach, Florida 32961 Re: Initial Participating Party Commitments Mr. Macht: CRA Care Centers, Inc. (CRA Care) hereby makes the Following commitments to the Indian River County Board of County Commissioners. CRA Care will 1. Construct an assisted living facility in unincorporated Indian River County, 2. Invest more than $1,500,000 in private funds to purchase land and develop the facility, 3. Create a minimum of 26 full time equivalent jobs at the ALF within 24 months of the County's grant agreement with the Florida Department of Community Affairs, with a minimum of 14 (over 51 %) of those jobs being for low to moderate income persons, 4. Enter into a legally binding participating party agreement with the County upon the County's receipt of CDBG economic development funds for this project, and 5. Comply with local, state and federal requirements applicable to developing, licensing and operating the assisted living facility and receiving Community Development Block Grant funds. This commitment is conditioned upon the availability of non-CDBG loan funds which are anticipated to be received by CRA Care Centers, Inc. for the development of the facility, and upon actions of the Indian River County Board of County Commissioners (the County). The County will 1. Apply for (between April 14 and April 20, 1999) and receive (if awarded) a $750,000 Economic Development Community Development Block Grant from the Florida Department of Community Affairs. 2. Issue $690,000 of the CDBG funds to CRA Care in the form of a 4% interest loan, to be issued for furnishings and equipment (approximately $140,000 for seven years) and building construction (approximately S550,000 for twenty years), 3. Finance the extension of an essential wastewater Force main to the ALF site on 66th Avenue (Schumann Drive) through a developer agreement with CRA Care, charging CRA Care only for the normal 515.77 per foot assessment, and 3. Allow CRA Care to provide a water main extension to loop the existing (lead end 6" line on 66th Avenue to 64th Avenue or lather appropriate route as determined by CRA. in order to provide adequate fire flog.+ for the building`s sprinkler system. 0 40 • Page 2 of 3 The facility cannot be constructed without the wastewater extension and the increase in water vol::me and pressure, due to permitting requirements and safety factors. This commitment is also conditioned upon final approval by the County of the zoning special exception for the project (the site is zoned RM6, which specifically allows this development by special exception). I plan to locate the ALF in a 42,500 square foot building on a 22 acre site in unincorporated Indian River County near the City of Sebastian. We plan to use a CDBG-ED loan as partial funding of the ALF. Funding sources and amounts include a $690,000 CDBG-ED loam to CRA Care Centers, a $4,279,860 commercial lending institution loan to CRA Care Centers, Inc., and up to $350,025 in additional owner equity. With the $60,000 CDBG-ED grant administration funds that the State will pay to Indian River County, the total estimated project cost is $5,379,885. The commercial loan will be used for design, land acquisition, utilities, site development, loan fees, other professional fees, pre -operational marketing, additional furnishings and start up supplies, and building costs. lAost of the owner equity funds will be used for operating deficits, broker fees and other non-CD13G eligible project costs, and some of the funds have been issued for binder fees on the property, surrey costs, a market study, and developer fetes. Please note that this is a budget estimate and that the actual amount of owner equity and commercial loan may change slightly. For grant scoring purposes, KV are claiming only $1,500,000from the contrnercial lending insdiurion loan us private leverage, because this is the maximum amount for which application points can be awarded. For grant application scoring purposes, CRA Care Centers, Inc. is committing to create 26 new jobs. At the time of hiring, at least 51%e of the new employees (14) will have low to moderate household incomes as defined by HUD income limits. The ALF will provide care levels from nearly independent to extended care which involves some skilled nursing. Also, dementia care (Alzheimer's and other types of dementia) will be provided in a separate secured, specially designed part of the building. Staffing plans are based upon the proposed services, and the staffing of similar facilities. The majority of jobs to be created will be service type occupations that would be required to serve the elderly and handicapped. The types of jobs that will be needed to serve the ALF residents will include cooks, personal care aids, LPNs, housekeepers, maintenance personnel, certified nurses aides, a social director, administrator, ftnancialladministrat ive assistant, receptionist, etc. The majority of the jobs to be created will be readily available to persons with a high school education. A review of 1990 census information for the Indian River County area shows there is a significant number of residents in the County that have only a high school education or below and would benefit grcatly from this project. CRA Care Centers, Inc. estimates within 24 months of grant award the ALF will be at 50% capacity and that 26 jobs will have been created. Within 30 months ot'grant award, the ALF will be at full capacity with 35 for more full time equivalent ;lobs anticipated. l err grall, scr,ring prrrposety. CRA is vtono +ruin{t to create ?6 jcahs ►rrtlrhr two }rcrrs r�,F}�r°rrrri rot, aid EI F--] Page 3of3 The commercial loan in the amount of $4,279,860 will be from First Colony Capital, Inc. We anticipate the interest rate to be approximately 7.5%. The CDBG-ED loan will be in a second position to the commercial loan on the buildings and land. Within 60 days from DCA's offer of grant award, we agree to have binding financial commitments in place for all. of our project costs. CRA Care agrees to begin final design, permitting and construction of the ALF upon the release of grant funds from the grant agency, the Florida Department of Community Affairs (DCA). The business plan includes the terms of our financial commitment related to the ALF construction and operation plans. It also provides documentation to demonstrate the need to hire 35 employees, of which 26 will be claimed for grant application scaring purposes. Our documentation is based on a review of other ALF"s of similar size. We are willing to provide any other documentation as may be needed by DCA and the County. CRA Care Centers, Inc. (CRA Care) is a subchapter -S company incorporated under the laws of the State of Florida, formed to provide services such as assisted living. I am the sole owner, director, President and CEO of CRA Care (FEI#59-3159078). Neither CRA Care nor I personally have any business or personal interests associated with any elected official or employee of Indian River County. CRA Care is not owned by, and does not have ownership in, any other corporation or business. CRA Care Centers, Inc. will utilize engineering services of CRA Engineering, Inc. for design and implementation of the site development work and the necessary water and sewer extensions, and will use the administrative services of CRA Consulting, Inc. for functions such as book keeping and personnel management. I am the sole owner of both of these Florida for profit corporations. Neither I nor any of the CRA corporations have ever declared bankruptcy. As sole principal of CRA Care Centers, Inc., I will personally guarantee the CDBG loan. Additional information required by the County or DCA will be furnished by me and/or CRA Care as necessary. I wish to thank the Indian River County Hoard of County Commissioners, and its dedicated staff, for supporting this project. Your efforts are appreciated. I look forward to completing this project which will benefit the county through increased local employment, an increase in the property tax base and other government revenues, spin off business, and a stabilizing development in the neighborhood in which the project will be located. Sincerely, X2 (Vd)t W. H. Bud Clark President, CRA Care Centers, Inc. • • 0 CRA CARE CENTERS, INC. BUSINESS FLAN CRA Care Centers, Inc. (CRA Carey is a subchapter -S company incorporated under the laws of the State of Florida, formers to provide services such as assisted living (SIC8052). William H. (Bud) Claris its the sole owner, director, President and CEO of CRA Care (FEI#59- 3169878). This is a start up venture, with no current paid employees. Funding and support for the corporation's start up has been provided by the firm's owner, through other business ventures he owns. Mr. Clark and his consultant, Deborah Rouinelis (former co-owner of CRA Care) have been investigating the assisted living facility industry for the past three years. attending numerous seminars. conferences, administrator training courses, touring other facilities and discussing every pertinent topic with professionals in the ALF field. CRA Care plans to develop its first assisted living facility (ALF) on land located south of the City of Sebastian, in Indian River County, Florida. The location is 66th Avenue, or Schumann Drive, CRA Care Centers currently has two parcels of property under contract for purchase, with a total of approximately 16 acres of undeveloped land. The contracts are conditions upon CRA obtaining financing for the project. The ALF will be the job site for approximately 35 new full time equivalent jobs. During the 24 months after the Indian River County CDBG award and issuance of financing to CRA, CRA will create 26 of the new jobs at the ALF site. The staffing commitments are shown on CDBG-E-10. Ms. Roumeliis developed this plan after careful analysis of the proposed services and fees, and the staffing of similar facilities. Pro -Forma financial information has been prepared for CRA Care Centers, .Int.'s assisted living facility, to be called Three Palms of Sebastian. This information is included as an appendix to the grant application. Additional documents which are a part of this business plan include 1. Excerpts from the market study conducted by MDS Market Research Company, Inc., 2. Resume of Kyle Lockeby, the proposed management consultant for the project,. 3. Projected Staffing 4. Full Operating Budget (achieved at month 17 of operation) 5. Monthly Operating Budget and Cash Flow, Initial 16 Months of Operation 6. Monthly Revenues 7. Furnishings and Equipment , db i FORM CDBG-E-10 PROPOSED NEW JOB CREATION INFORMATION SUBMITTED BY CRA CARE CENTERS, INC. 108 TITLE O% CREATED 1013 HOURLY TOTAL PTE TOTAL FTE TOTAL TOTAL ANNUAL PROPOSED PAY RATE JOBS TO BE JOBS TO BE ANNUAL PAYROLL FOR 111RING DATE OR ANSA► CREATED CREATED PAYROLL JOBS TO BE MONTH YEAR PAY RATES FOR LMI FOR THIS JOB CREATED FOR PERSONS TITLE LMI PERSONS Administrator 544,000 1 0 $44,000 0 6100 Admin/Fiscal 23,000 1 0 23,000 0 6100 Asslstam RN 38.000 3 0 11,400 n 6.101 Social Director 29,000 l 0 29,000 0 6101 Receptionist 17,500 .5 0 8,750 0 6101 CNA 16,200 14.5 14 2.34,900 226,800 6100.1102 Lead CNA 18.000 3 0 54,000 0 12100 LPN 30,000 4.5 0 135.000 0 12100 Chef 28,000 1 0 28,000 0 12100 Cook 17,000 1 0 17,000 0 12100 Assistant Cook 15,120 5 5 75,600 75,600 6101-1102 Housekeeper 15,120 1.5 1 22,280 15,120 12100 GroundsKeeper 17AW 1 1 $17,000 517,000 8100 Maintenance 35.3' 210# $G99,�J30 $334,520 TOTALS *26 counted for grant scoring. purpows All salariestwages are in 1999 dollars **14 counred for grant Scoring purposes i O,+ • AD 11 CRA CARE CENTERS, INC. TIME PALMS OF SEBASTIAN 70 BED ASSISTED LIVING FACILITY FINANCIAL SUMMARY LOCATION: NEAR THE CITY OF SEBASTIAN, INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA SIZE OF BUILDING: 42,500 SQUARE FEET, 66 rooms ESTIMATE] PERIOD OF CONSTRUC'T'ION: July, 1999 - March, 2000 TOTAL ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: 55,319,885 ESTIMATED DEVELOPMENT BUDGET CATEGORY AMOUNT LAND S 340,000 (Actual, under option) OFF SITE WATERISEWER $ 47,400 BUfLDTNG $3,050,500 ($71Af plus bond) PROFESSIONAL FEES $ 234,000 SITE WORK $ 280,004 PERNUT FEES $ 19,400 IMPACT, FEES35.OM TOTAL CONSTRUCTION 53,665,500 CONSTRUCTION LOAN S 210,300 FURNITURE, EQUIPMENT $166,000 RECORDING, TAXES $ 28,000 HUD & LENDER FEES $ 250,085 AUDIT $ 5,000 START-UP MARKETING $ 70,000 TMT1ALL TRAINING&HIRE $ 15,000 (pre -opening) MANAGEMENT CONSULT $ 20,000 (pre -opening) OPERATLNG LOSSES $ 550.004 (after opening) TOTAL SOFT COSTS 5 938,085 FINANCING ASSUMPTIONS A. A first mortgage loan of $4,279,860 is issued from a First Colony Capital, Inc, fully amortizing over 40 years, at no more than 7.9% interest including mortgage insurance premium. Payments are S29,118 monthly, B A construction loan will be issued at a 7.5% interest rate, over a twelve month period of time for a cost of $210,315. The construction loan would canvert into a permanent loan, i C-1 C7 s with only one set of closing costs. C. A CDBG loan at 41,o is issued in the amount of $690,000. $550,000 will be for land and improvements, for 20 years (53,333 monthly). $140,000 will be for furnishings and equipment, for a team of 7 years ($1,914 monthly). This loan would be in secondary position. D. The owner will invest 5359,040 in the identified costs. The owner will also defer management fees for the first 17 months of operation, billing those fees later during the second year of operation. PROJECT FINANCING, $5,319,885 TOTAL PROJECT COST $4,279,860 Private loan, FILA insured S 6",000 CORG loan S 350,025 Owner cash (includes $31,600 management services, $25,040 engineering services, $16,000 market study paid, $3,500 survey paid) �*D 40 40 11 ALF Development Budget Categories S 340,000 band: actual contract price for two parcels totaling 22.55 acres $ 47,004 Off site 1500 LF 6" water @ $24 (Make Hotchkiss estimate for current local costs), 674 LF sewer assessment @ $15.77 $3,050,500 Building: 42,500 square feet @ $71 ($3,017,500) plus bond 1% building and s4e ($33,040) $ 234,000 Professional fees $181,000 architect, Donohue & Co. (approximately 6% of building) $ 26,000 engineering, site and off-site utilities, permitting (CRA Engineering)*** $ 3,500 environmental assessment, Phase I $ 1,000 soil testing $ 3,000 landscape design $3,500 already paid to Masteler, Moler & Reed (reimbursable by tender) $15,400 market study already ,paid to MDS (reimbursable by lender) $ 264,000 Site work: parking, walkways, storm water, interior utilities, clearing, grading, plantings & sod, fence, lighting, signage, irrigation, $80,000 lift. station $ 19,004 Permit fees for building, environmental, special exception, utilities $ 35,004 Impact fees: County utilities, road $155,040 Furniture and equipment, itemized separately Soft Costs $ 210,300 Construction Ivan: Interest at 7.5% for twelve months using FHA disbursement rate $ 5,000 Cost audit required by FHA $ 28,000 Closing costs: documentary stamps, intangible tax, recording $ 70,040 Start-up marketing: consultant fees, marketing materials, advertising fees, staff time for pre4casing and sales (FHA/HUD allow $1500 per bed) 15,000 Initial training and hiring: advertising, interviewing, screening, training staff, and pre -opening Administrator salary $ 20,000 Management consultant fee, development and early opening stage $ 550,040 Operating losses, shown on initial 16 month cash flow (includes $31,600 CRA management/administrative services, to be absorbed by CRA fimts) CI E-A 00 W � q n kn G9 6QR �} 663 V'} � V9 ffS 6/7 5l`7 6:3 if1 � p O O Q� tC v fi�9 6�9 GI3 69 64 f~A N 607 � O n q R '«��• °5fi � � � 5 9 4�R a r 59 f�9 s� � 69 w :o lk �i N M M in `. T ©46 46 to S b N o 0 s a 69 Rei "D f03 n 4 N M V' t- 4 N 507 GN+3 rd9 6/3 [%R 49 69 69 :m CC 9 .. N t- co L "'PS g 4 E. er er 6nC ' �f Sfl c!3 663 6 9 [ 9� 6�9 I::a 69 N N N N rwif 66i N9 69 CA 69 607 bh Gh WK3y (+h V! yy w fl r Gir N Kl 04 e 42 a0 p w wt 1 Fad ifi Er, n � � u o M .. o H hod fi X64 L! •M-. � .�.. U C.7 w h _ � � � F tai o -N n f^3 (N M ;; o C+ OCD 4; *+ CIS 5NR (A4A .,C 6R WZ 69 VY 6y M ve G p O Q G Y C C 4C O Q w EN C Ve CC77 Z r- O 6M9 00 ci t- 69 to r (00)9 pp (i3 W c+f 00 N V. N N G K fi' T N tT�+ C � lz 0± �• "� C nt y�q tAA W N N N N O (09 666 '✓kIZ �o FST 0-0 gy�pp" V � QQ IM u7 q p o ami 4 •a V fA ry ih 'T V1 69 tZ Lw 69 CL %i 69 iFt VY'i 4t Cd M M M M M r C O CL. cq (A (¢} tfj 6q V9 6R V a N ra r`a f'i N N G �'• r" x v, , �n e 42 a0 'R u o M .. o � hod fi X64 L! •M-. � .�.. U C.7 w h _ � � � F tai o -N n f^3 (N M ;; o C+ OCD 4; *+ ,C Imo. .,C 6R WZ 69 VY � t q 'p 0 C vs Q w CL E C7 td d Z r- O o c� o d �rN- DDOO a Q ci b) G9 vi tri b�9 6�'9 J3 O t- 00 Q* y•r- y r a caoo M Q•. Vf $ 7r�a o pyyA C? ® C eaU � fMf! 'A z" 6q nt y�q tAA W .o "✓y~i h rr ao G1 vi ri G] ro jL a O U air E . A. '✓kIZ �o FST 0-0 gy�pp" V � IM u7 czo �0 r,^ raaoZ w,ra c+o.?,?79 o ami 4 V fA ry ih 'T V1 69 e a CL N . do #i 40 C> • THREE PALMS OF SEBASTIAN 70 BED ALF PROJECTED STAFFING FIRST SEVENTEEN MONTHS OF OPERATION 30 Beds Dementia Care 44 Beds Regular Extended Congregate Care Assumptions There are no residents for the first month after the facility construction is complete. At the end of that time, five residents would begin occupancy, and an additional four to five would enter each month at the beginning of the month, At the end of the first six months, there would be a total of 25 residents, of which 14 would be in the dementia care unit. After six months, new occupancy would decrease to four per month, due to the initiation of turnover in original occupancy, with one of the four being deme=ntia care. full occupancy of 63 (assumes 9U°/ooccupancy) will be achieved by the beginning of the seventeenth month, with 27 in dementia care and 36 in regular care, All of the residents would be receiving a moderate to high level of personal assistance, involving at least two ADLs (such as supervision of self- administered medication, and bathing). The staff perform all necessary tasks during the initial period of occupancy, regardless of job description, with the exception of administrative or other duties which must be performed by the administrator or nurse. All staff members vAll be certified in first aid and complete a course on UUV and AIDS in the workplace within one month of employment. Special training will be provided in the area of dementia care. Criminal background, abuse registry, driving record, and workers compensation claims checks, as well as drug use testing will be performed on employment applicants before employment, in addition to ,general employment reference checks. RN will be utilized on a part time basis as a supervisor for the LPNs. First Month, 0 residents There must be six initial employees of the facility. One is the administrator, who will be marketing and finalizing other arrangements such as supplier contracts and social services. An RN will be on the payroll as part time, for licensing purposes only at this stage, but marketing tasks will be assigned until actual nursing services are needed. Another is the administrative/financial assistant. A CNA will be hired and trained during the month (with emphasis on dementia care), during which time she will also do cleaning. A half time lawn and maintenance person will also be hired. Second Month, 5 residents A full time social director will be hired and trained (emphasis on dementia care) this month. The social director function will be important for marketing/sales purposes as well as service delivery, and will relieve the administrator of the burden of weekend work All social activities (including shopping and other excursions) will be planned and supervised by this employee, who will also perform other tasks as necessary to assist the administrator and provide personal care to residents, t! C� • As soon as one resident is admitted, around the clock care must be provided. An LPN will be hired and trained as a supervisor and health/personal care giver. The administrator, social director, and LPN will alternate hours, with at least one present from 7:00 am to 10:00 pmt, seven days a week. The CNA will initially work 10:00 pm to TIDO am shift, staying primarily in the dementia unit but also making rounds in the other sections, with "check in" supervision by the LPN. The night shift employee will have primary responsibility for laundry and cleaning the areas other than occupied resident rooms, except for vacuuming where the noise would be disruptive to residents' sleep. Cooking and kitchen clean up duties will be rotated among staff until a chef is hired. Third Mouth, 9 residents A chef will be hired this month. The chef will develop menus with the administrator, and will order, receive and store groceries. The chef, initially working six days a week, will cook breakfast and lunch (the main meal of the day), wash dishes, clean the kitchen and dining room, and do advance preparation of dinners and lunch for the seventh day. Other staff will finalize and serve dinner, with cleanup by the night shill. The other staff will be responsible for meals one day per week during the chef s day off Fourth Month, 14 residents Two CMAs will be hired to alternate on a 9 pm to 7 am shift. One aide will provide personal care, cleaning and cooking assistance during the day. The night hours will still be used for cleaning and laundry, Fifth Month, IS residents Another LPN will be hired this month for evening work, and a fourth CNA will be added. A Lead CNA will be hired for dementia care. There will still be only one person on duty between 11 pmt and 7 am. A full time housekeeper will be hired. A cooly will also be hired to work four ten-hour days. The chef will also have four ten-hour days, with the overlap allowing the chef extra time for ordering and stocking food, altering menus, etc., and providing necessary time off for each of the two employees. Sixth Month, 22 residents Two more aides will be essential, one of whom will be a Lead CTIA for the night shift. There will now be two aides on duty in the facility at all times, along with a nurse each day. Two part time assistant cooks will be hired to assist with lunch each day and to do advance dinner preparation The waintenancefgrounds keeper position will become full time, in order to keep up with increasing needs in the dementia unit. Seventh Month, 26 residents Two additional aides will be hired. Also, a half tiane receptionist will be added for weekend clays and other times when the administrative assistant is out. Eighth Month, M residents There will be thirty residents, so one additional full time aide will be employed. A third full time 40 LPN supervisor will also be added for the night shift. A full time assistant cook will be also be hired. A new part time housekeeper will work weekends and other days, so there: will be a housekeeper on duty each day, Ninth Month, 34 residents Another "Chief Aide" will be hired for the weekday morning shift in the dementia unit. Another aide (number 9) will also be employed full time. Tenth Month, 38 residents The assistant cook positions will be upgraded to 2S full time equivalent positions, and another CNA will be hired. An additional LPN will be hirer] for daytime work. Eleventh Month, 42 residents Two more CNAs will be added to the staff this month. Twelfth Month, 46 residents One more aide will be hired this month, and there will now be another Cull time assistant cook. Thirteenth Month, SO residents If 50 residents are in occupancy, another CNA will be added. Fourteenth Month, 54 residents Another assistant cook will be hired, for a total of 4.5. Fifteenth Month, 57 residents A part time LPN will be hired for the night shift, and the assistant cooks will be increased to's FTEs, Sixteenth Month, 60 resideats One part time CNA will be added. Full stalling will now be in place. Seventeenth Month, 63 residents No new staff positions. 0 i c o a a 91 � -.. 9 n a10 m ti W 13. r> fJl O C l.i 00 00 Ci to C] ep W w 90 04 Vs jw ® A A !a .A w W rt� i.a tir, vi J 00 p C a [J ta J ilr W 00 d W V, til w IJ W ;14 00 1,r6 lf, — �'+ lrJDD o LA w d rr Q a GO V, l!1 L W 1J SQA W W ••+ �. LA W to A W w O Ln p W tT N 09 in ra W v, A w A lR w W W T �1a l+a v, — �..r A LA vs Ww W Un W '-A _ O i/n p d C7+ W %A Li W_ W 1r W _ V 'fT 1,f, 00 V. d,T rL �—A 40 6 Actual wort: days per month for full time employees: Average 4 days/month 30.5 Average # weeks/month 4.33 Average # work days @ 5/week 21.67 Average # sick days l Average # personal days @ l 0/year .83 Average # holidays @ 8/year .67 'total Average days off 2.5 Potentia; work days/month 21.67 Minus days off 2.5 Average actual work days 19.1.7 40 r PROJECTED PERSONNEL EXPENSES FULL STAFFING LEVELS Monthly Personnel Costs. 1999 rates Position Annual Salary Monthly Salary #FTE Total $ per month Administrator $ 44,00000 $ 3,666.67 1 S 3,666.67 Admin/Financial Asst. $ 23,000.00 $ 1,916.67 1 S 1,916.67 RN (121tr/week)* $ 38,000.00 $ 3,166.67 .3 S 950.00 Social Director $ 29,000.00 $ 2,416.67 1 $ 2,416.67 Receptionist $ 1.7,500.04 $ 1,458.33 .5 $ 729.17 CNA/Pers.Care Aide $ 16,200.00 $ 1,350.00 14.5 S 19,575.00 Lead CNA $ 18,000.00 $ 1,500.00 3 S 4,500.00 LPN $ 30,000.00 $ 2,500.00 4.5 $ 11,250.00 Chef $ 28,000.00 $ 2,333.33 1 $ 2,333.33 Cook $ 17,000.00 $ 1,416.67 1 $ 1,41+6.67 Ast. Cook $ 15,120.00 $ 1,260.00 5 S 6,300.00 Housekeeper $ 15,120.04 $ 1,260.00 1.5 S 1,890.00 Grounds/Maimenance $ 17,000.00 $ 1,416.67 1 $ 1,416.67 Total Personnel 35,340 S 58,360.83 Payroll Taxes 16% S 9,337.73 Insurance Benefits $ 150.00 35.3 S 5,295.00 Retirement, 3% x 90% of salaries $ 1,575.74 Consulting Dietitian $ 45.00 l hour S 45.00 Total Personnel Cost 5 74,614.31 'RN hours may 6e increased to 20 per week ( 5 F'rE) if neccessary for resident medical care. • PROJECTED PERSONNEL EXPENSES INITIAL 16 MONTHS 117onthI Personnel Costs, Full Suffine Uvels 1999 rates Position Annual Salary Monthly #FTE Total S Salary Months 17 months Administrator $ 44,000.00 $ 3,666.67 16 $ 58,666.67 Adminil:inancial Asst. $ 23,000,00 $ 1,916.67 15.5 $ 29,708.33 RN {12 hr/week) $ 38,000,00 $ 3,166.67 4.8 $ 15,200.00 Social Director $ 29,000.00 $ 2,416.67 15 $ 36,250,00 Receptionist $ 17,500.00 $ 1,458.33 5 $ 7,291.67 CNAIPers.Care Aide $ 16,200.00 $ 1,350.00 130,5 $ 176,175.00 Lead CNA $ 18,000,00 $ 1,500.00 31 $ 46,500.00 LPN $ 30,000.00 $ 2,500.00 44 $ I10,000_00 Chef $ 28,000.00 $ 2,333.33 14 $ 32,666.67 Cook $ 17,000.00 $ 1,416.67 12 $ 17,000.00 Ast. Cook $ 15,120.00 $ 1,260.00 32.5 $ 40,950.00 Housekeeper $ 15,120,00 $ 1,260.00 16.5 $ 20,790.00 Grounds/Maintenance $ 17,000.00 $ 1,416.67 13.5 $ 19,125.00 Total Personnel 350.30 $ 610,323.33 Payroll 'faxes 16°ld $ 97,651.73 Insurance Benefits $ 150.00 350,3 $ 52,545.00 Retirement, 3% x 90910 of $ 16,478.73 salaries Consulting Dietitian $ 45.00 16 $ 720.00 hours Total Personnel Cost $ 777,718.80 C�] PROJECTED PERSONNEL EXPENSES MONTH 1 Position Annual Salary Monthly Salary #FTE Nfonths #FTE Months Total S 17 months AdrninistratorC $ 44,000.00 $ 3,666.67 1 $ 3,666.67 RN, 12 hours/week 3,666.67 $38,000.00 full $ 3,166,67 .3 $ 950.00 Admin/Financial Asst. $ 23,000.00 $ 1,916.67 .5 $ 958.33 CNA/Pers.Care Aide $ 16,200.00 $ 1,350.00 1 $ 1,350.00 Grounds/Maintenance $ 17,000.00 $ 1,416.67 .5 $ 74$.33 Total Personnel $ 1,416.67 5 5.88 3.30 is 7,633,33 Payroll Taxes 16% S 13,508.33 $ 1,221.33 Insurance Benefits $ 150.00 3.3 $ 495.00 Retirement, 3% x 90% of salaries $ 206,10 Consulting Dietitian $ 45.00 l is 45.00 Total Personnel Cost $ 9,600.77 ;MONTH 2 Position Annual Salary Monthly Salary #FTE Months Total $ 17 months Ad"nistrator/ Dir ECC $ 44,000.00 $ 3,666.67 l $ 3,666.67 RN, 12 hours/week $38,000.00 full $ 3,166.67 1 .3 $ 950.00 Admin/Financial Asst. $ 23,000.00 $ 1,916.67 1 $ 1,91.6.67 Social Dir/Ast, Admin CNA/Pers.Care Aide LPN $ $ $ 29,000.00 16,200.00 30,000.00 S $ $ 2,416.67 1,350,00 2,500.00 1 1 1 $ $ $ 2,416.67 1,350.00 2,500.00 Grounds/Maintenance $ 17,000.00 $ 1,416.67 5 5.88 $ 708.33 Total Personnel S 13,508.33 CI U-1 PROJECTED PERSONNEL EXPENSES MONTH 1 Position Annual Salary Monthly Salary #FTE Months Total $ 17 months AdministratorC S 44,000.00 $ 3,666.67 l $ 3,666.67 RN, 12 hours/week $38,000.00 full $ 3,166.67 .3 $ 950.00 Admin/'Financial Asst. $ 23,000.00 $ 1,916.67 .5 $ 958.33 CNAIPers.Care Aide $ 16,200 00 S 1,350.00 l $ 1,350.00 Grounds/Maintenance $ 17,000.00 $ 1,416.67 .5 $ 708.33 Total Personnel 1,916.67 1 3.30 $ 7,633.33 Payroll Taxes 16% S 29,000.00 $ 2,416,67 $ 1,221.33 Insurance Benefits 2,416.67 $ 150.00 3.3 $ 495.00 Retirement, 3% x 90°10 of salaries 1 $ 1,350,00 $ 206.10 Consulting Dietitian $ $ 45.00 1 $ 45.00 Total Personnel Cost Grounds[Maintenance $ 17,000.00 S $],600.77 MONTH 2 Position Annual Salary Monthly #FTE Total $ Salary Months 17 months Administrator/ Dir ECC $ 44,000.00 $ 3,666.67 1 S 3,666.67 RN, 12 hours/week $38,000.00 full $ 3,166.67 1 .3 $ 950.00 Admin/Financial Asst. 5 23,000.00 $ 1,916.67 1 $ 1,916.67 Social DirlAst Adinln S 29,000.00 $ 2,416,67 1 $ 2,416.67 CNAIPers.Care Aide. S 16,200.00 $ 1,350.00 1 $ 1,350,00 LPN S 30,000.00 $ 2,500.00 1 $ 2,500.00 Grounds[Maintenance $ 17,000.00 S 1,416.67 5 $ 708.33 Total Personnel $.80 S 13,801#.33 40 46 • Payroll Taxes 16"-,fo $ 2,161.33 Insurance Benefits $ 150.00 5.8 $ 870.00 Retirement, 3% x 90% $ 364.73 Consulting Dietitian $ 45.00 ] $ 45,00 Tectal Personnel Cost $ 16,949.39 MONTH 3 Position Annual Salary Monthly #1{TE Total S Salary Months 17 months Administrator/Dir ECC $ 44,000.00 $ 3,666.67 1 $ 3,666.67 RN', 12 hours/week $38,000.00 ball $ 3,166.67.3 $ 950.00 Adtnin/Financial Asst. $ 23,000.00 $ 1,9I6.67 1 $ 1,916.67 Social Dir/Ast. Admin $ 29,000.00 $ 2,416.67 1 $ 2,416.67 CNA/Pers.Care Aide $ 16,200.00 $ 1,350.00 1 $ 1,350.00 LPN $ 30,000.00 $ 2,500.00 l $ 2,500.00 Chef $ 28,000.00 $ 2,333.33 1 $ 2,333.33 GroundsfMaintenance $ 17,000.00 $ 1,416,67 .5 $ 708.33 Total Pee sonnei 6.80 $ 15,841.66 Payroll i'axes 160/6 $ 2,534.67 Insurance Benefits $ 150.00 6.8 $ 1,020.00 Retirement, 3% x 90% $ 427.72 Consulting Dietitian $ 45.00 1 $ 45.00 Total Personnel Cost $ 19,869.05 C-1 EI MONTH 4 Annual Salary Monthly #F`TE Total $ SAIRry Position 17 months Annual Salary $ 44,000.00 Nionthly #FTE $ 3,666.67 Total S $38,000 00 full S 3,166.67 .3 $ 950.00 Salary Months $ 1,916.67 I7 months Administrator/Director of $ 44,000.00 S 3,666,67 1 $ 3,666.67 Nursing/ECC 4 S 5,400.00 Lead CNA $ 18,000.00 $ 1,500.00 1 5 1.500.00 RN, 12 hours/week $38,000.00 full $ 3,166.67 .3 S 950.00 Admin/Financi;d Asst. $ 23,000.00 $ 1,916.67 1 $ 1,916.67 Social Dir/Ast. Admin $ 29,000.00 $ 2,416.67 1 S 2,416.67 CNA/Pers.Care Aide $ 16,200.00 $ 1,350,00 3 S 4,050.00 LPN $ 30,000.00 $ 2,500.00 1 $ 2,500.00 Chef $ 28,000.00 $ 2,333.33 1 5 2,333.33 Grounds/Maintenance $ 17,000.00 $ 1,416.67 .5 $ 708.33 Tota] Personnel 8,80 5 18,541.67 Payroll Taxes 16% $ 2,966.67 Insurance Benefits $ 150.00 8.8 S 1,320.00 Retirement, 3% x 90% $ 500.63 Consulting Dietitian S 45.40 1 S 45,00 Total Personnel Cost S 23,373.96 MONTH 5 Position Annual Salary Monthly #F`TE Total $ SAIRry Months 17 months Administrator/Dir ECC $ 44,000.00 $ 3,666.67 1 $ 3,666.67 RN, 12 hours/week $38,000 00 full S 3,166.67 .3 $ 950.00 Admin/Financial Asst. $ 23,004.00 $ 1,916.67 1 S 1,916.67 Social DirlAst. Admin $ 29,000.04 $ 2,416.67 1 $ 2,416.67 CNA/Pers-Care Aide $ 16,200.00 $ 1,350.00 4 S 5,400.00 Lead CNA $ 18,000.00 $ 1,500.00 1 5 1.500.00 40 40 LPN $ 30,000.00 $ 2,500.00 2 $ 5,000.00 Chef $ 28,000.00 $ 2,333.33 1 $ 2,333.33 Cook $ 17,000.00 $ 1,416.67 l $ 1,416.67 Housekeeper $ 15,120.00 $ 1,260.00 1 $ 9,260.00 Grounds/Maintenance $ 17,000.00 $ 1,416.67 .5 $ 708.33 Total Personnel $ 16,200.00 $ 1,350.00 13.80 $ 26,568.33 Payroll Taxes 16% $ 18,000.00 $ 1,500.00 2 $ 4,250.93 Insurance Benefits $ 30,000.00 $ 150.00 13.8 $ 2,070.00 Retirement, 3%x 90% $ 28,000.00 $ 2,333.33 l $ 717.35 Consulting Dietitian $ 17,000.00 $ 45.00 1 $ ""0 Total Personnel Cost $ 15,120.00 $ 1,260.00 1 $ 33,651.61 MONTH 6 Position Annual Salary Monthly Salary #FTE Months Total $ 17 months Administrator/Dir ECC $ 44,000.00 $ 3,666.67 1 $ 3,666.67 RN, 12 hours/week $38,000.00 full $ 3,166.67 3 $ 950.00 Admin/Financial Asst. $ 23,000.00 $ 1,916.67 1 $ 1,916.67 Social Dir/Ast. Admin $ 29,000.00 $ 2,416.67 1 Is 2,416.67 CNA/Pers-Care Aide $ 16,200.00 $ 1,350.00 5 IS 6,750,00 Lead CNA $ 18,000.00 $ 1,500.00 2 IS 3,000.00 LPN $ 30,000.00 $ 2,500.00 2 $ 5,000.00 Chef $ 28,000.00 $ 2,333.33 l $ 2,333.33 Cook $ 17,000.00 $ 1,416.67 1 $ 1,416.67 Ast. Cook $ 15,120.00 $ 1,260.00 1 $ 1,260.00 Housekeeper $ 15,120.00 $ 1,26000 1 $ 1,26000 Grounds/Maintenance $ 17,000.00 $ 1,41667 1LS 1,41667 Total Personnel 17.301 31,3$6.67 • i ParToll Taxes 16% Annual Salary $ 5,021,87 Insurance Benefits #VFE S 150.410 17.3 $ 2,595.00 Retirement, 3% x 90% $ 847.44 Consulting Dietitian Months $ 45.00 1 $ 45.00 Total Personnel Cost$ $ 44,000.00 39,895.97 1,310]►II11TE Position Annual Salary Monthly #VFE Total 5 Salary Months 17 months Administrator/Dir ECC $ 44,000.00 $ 3,666.67 l $ 3,666.67 RN, 12 hours/week $38,000.00 full S 3,166.67 .3 $ 950.00 Admin/F nancial Asst. S 23,000,00 $ 1,916.67 1 $ 1,916.67 Receptionist $ 17,500.00 $ 1,458.33 ,5 $ 729.17 Social Dir/Ast. Admin $ 29,000.00 $ 2,416.67 1 S 2,416.67 CNAIPers.Care Aide $ 16,200.00 $ 1,350.00 7 $ 9,450.00 Lead CNA $ 18,000.00 $ 1,500.00 2 $ 3,000.00 LPN $ 30,000.00 $ 2,500.00 2 S 5,000.00 Chef $ 28,00+0.00 $ 2,333.33 1 $ 2,333.33 Cook $ 17,000.00 $ 1,416.67 l $ 1,416.67 Ast. Cook $ 15,120.00 $ 1,260.00 1 $ 1,260.00 Housekeeper $ 15,120.00 $ 1,260.00 1 $ 1,260.00 Grounds/Maintenance $ 17,000.00 $ 1,416.67 1 $ 1,416.67 Total Personnel 19.80 S 34,815.83 Payroll Taxes 16% $ 5,570.53 Insurance Benefits $ 150.00 19.8 $ 2,970.00 Retirement, 3% x 90% $ 94003 Consulting Dietitian $ 4500 ] $ 45,00 'Total Personnel Cost S 44,341.39 i F-3 MONTH 8 Position Annual Salary Monthly Salary #FTE Months Total $ 17 months Adnartistrator/Dir ECC $ 44,000.00 $ 3,666.67 1 $ 3,666.67 RN, 12 hours/week $38,000.00 full $ 3,166.67 .3 is 950.00 AdrninfFinancial Asst. $ 23,000.00 $ 1,916.67 1 $ 1,916.67 Receptionist $ 17,500.00 $ 1,458.33 .5 $ 729.17 Social Dir/Ast. Adnan $ 29,000.00 $ 2,416.67 1 $ 2,41.6.67 CNAIPers.Care Aide $ 16,200.00 $ 1,350.00 8 $ 10,800.00 Lead CNA $ 18,000.00 $ 1,540.00 2 $ 3,000.00 LPN $ 30,000.00 $ 2,500.00 3 is 7,500.00 Chef $ 28,000.00 $ 2,333.33 1 $ 2,333.33 Cook $ 17,000.00 $ 1,416.67 1 $ 1,416.67 Ast. Cook $ 15,120.00 $ 1,260.00 2 $ 2,520.00 Housekeeper $ 15,120.00 $ 1,260.00 1.5 $ 1,890,00 Grounds/Maintenance $ 17,000.00 $ 1,416.67 1 $ 1,416.67 Total Personnel 23.30 $ 40,555.83 Payroll Taxes 16% $ 6,488.93 Insurance Benefits $ 150.00 23.3 $ 3,495,00 Retirement, 3% x 90% $ 1,095,01 Consulting Dietitian $ 45.00 1 S 45.00 Total Personnel Cost $ 51,679,7? 4D 40 MONTH 9 Position Annual Salary Monthly #F'TE 1 Total $ Salary Months 17 months Administrator/Dir ECC $ 44,004.00 $ 3,666.457 1 $ 3,666.67 RN, 12 hours/week $38,000.00 full $ 3,166.67 .3 $ 950.00 Admin/Financial Asst. $ 23,000.00 $ 1,916.67 1 $ 1,916.67 Receptionist $ 17,500.00 $ 1,458.33 .5 11 729.17 Social Dir/Ast. Admin $ 29,000.00 $ 21416.67 1 $ 2,416.67 CNA/Pers.Care Aide $ 16,200.00 $ 1,350.00 9 $ 12,150.00 Lead CNA $ 18,004.40 $ 1,500.00 3 $ 4,500.00 LPN $ 30,000.40 $ 2,500.00 3 $ 7,500.00 Chef $ 28,000.00 $ 2,333.33 1 $ 2,333.33 Cook $ 17,000.00 $ 1,416.67 1 $ 1,416.67 Ast. Cook $ 15,120.00 $ 1,260.00 2 $ 2,520.00 Housekeeper $ 15,120.00 S 1,260.00 1.5 $ 1,890.00 Grounds/Maintenance $ 17,000,00 $ 1,416.67 1 $ 1,416.67 Total Personnel 25,30 S 43,405.$3 Payroll Taxes 16% $ 6,944.93 Insurance Benefits $ 150.00 25.3 $ 3,795.00 Retirement, 3% x 90% $ 1,171.96 Consulting Dietitian $ 45.04 l $ 45.00 Total Personnel Cost S 55,.362.72 C-1 • r7 MONTH io Position Annual Salary Monthly Salary #FTE Months Total S 17 months AdministratorfDir ECC RN, 12 hours/week $ 44,000.00 S38,000.00 full $ $ 3,666.67 3,166.67 .7- 3 $ 3,666.67 950.00 Admin/Tinancial Asst. Receptionist Social Dir/Ast. Admin CNAIPers.Care Aide Lead CNA LPN Chef Cook $ $ $ S $ $ $ $ 23,000.00 17,500.00 29;000.00 16,200.00 18,000.00 30,000.00 28,000.00 17,000.00 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 1,916.67 1,458.33.5 2,416.67 1,350.00 1,500.00 2,500.00 2,333.33 1,416.67 1 $ $ 1 $ 10 $ 3 $ 4 $ t $ l $ 1,91.6.67 729.17 2,416.57 13,500.00 4,500.00 10,000.00 2,333.33 1,416.57 Ast. Cook Housekeeper &ounds/Maintenance Total Personnel Payroll Taxes 16% $ $ $ 15,120.00 15,120.00 17,000.00 $ $ $ 1,260.00 1,250.00 1,416.67 2.5 $ 1.5 $ 1 $ 27.80 S 3,150.00 1,890.00 1,416.57 47,885.83 Insurance Benefits Retirement, 3% x 900% Consulting Dietitian Total Personnel Cost $ $ 150.00 45.00 � 27.8 $ $ 1 g S 7.,661.73 4,170.00 1,292.92 45.00 61,055.48 F-] 40 MONTH 1I Position Annual Salary MOR(hly NFTE Total S Salary Months 17 months Administrator/Dir ECC $ 44,000.00 $ 3,666.67 1 S 3,666.67 RN, 12 hours/week $38,000.00 full $ 3,166.67 .3 $ 950.00 Adminffinancial Asst. $ 23,000.00 $ 1,916.67 1 $ 1,916.67 Receptionist $ 17,500.00 $ 1,458.33 .5 $ 729.17 Social Dir/Ast. Admin $ 29,000.00 $ 2,416.67 l $ 2,416,67 CNAIPers.Care Aide $ 16,200.00 $ 1,350.00 12 $ 16,200.00 Lead CNA $ 18,000.00 S 1,500.00 3 $ 4,500.00 LPN $ 30,000.00 $ 2,500.00 4 $ 10,000.00 Chef $ 28,000.00 $ 2,333.33 1 $ 2,333.33 Cook $ 17,000.00 $ 1,416.67 1 $ 1,416.67 Ast. Conk $ 15,120.00 $ 1,260.00 2.5 $ 3,150.00 Housekeeper $ 15,120.00 $ 1,260.00 1.5 $ 1,890.00 GrQunds/Maintenance $ 17,000,00 $ 1,416,67 I $ 1,416.67 Total Personnel 29,80 $ 54,585.83 Payroll Taxes 16% $ 8,093.73 Insurance Benefits $ 150.00 29.8 $ 4,470.00 Retirement, 3% x 90% $ 1,365 82 Consulting Dietitian $ 45.00 1 $ 45.00 Total Personnel Cost S 64,564.38 i cA MONTH 12 Position Annual Salary Monthly Salary WFE Months Total S 17 months Adrainistrator/Dir ECC $ 44,000.00 S 3,666.67 1 $ 3,666.67 RN, 12 hours/week $38,000.00 full $ 3,166.67 .3 Is 950.00 Admin/Financial Asst. $ 23,000.00 $ 1,916.67 1 $ 1,916.67 Receptionist $ 17,500.00 $ 1,458.33 ,5 $ 729.17 Social Dir/Ast. Admin $ 29,000.00 $ 2,416.67 1 $ 2,416.67 CNA/Pers.Care Aide $ 16,200.00 $ 1,350,00 13 $ 17,550.00 Lead CNA $ 18,000.00 $ 1,500.00 3 $ 4,500.00 LPN $ 30,000.00 S 2,500.00 4 $ 10,000,00 Chef $ 28,000.00 $ 2,33333 1 $ 2,333.33 Cook $ 17,000,00 $ 1,416.67 1 $ 1,416.67 Ast. Cook $ 15,12.0.00 $ 1,260,00 3.5 $ 4,410.00 Housekeeper $ 15,120.00 $ 1,260,00 1.5 $ 1,890.00 Grounds/Maintenance $ 17,000.00 $ 1,416.67 1 $ 1,416,67 Total Personnel 31.80 S 53,195.83 Payroll Taxes 16% $ 8,511.33 Insurance Benefits $ 150.00 31.8 $ 4,770.00 Retirement, 3% x 90%/u $ 1,436.29 Consulting Dietitian $ 45.00 l $ 45.00 Total Personnel {Cost IS 67,958.45 • MONTH 13 Position Annual Salary Monthly #FTE Total S Salary Months 17 months Administrator/Dir ECC $ 44,000.00 $ 3,666.67 1 $ 3,656.667 RN, 12 hours/week $38,000,00 full S 3,166.67 .3 $ 950.00 Admin/Financial Asst. $ 23,000.00 $ 1,716,67 1 $ 1,916.67 Receptionist $ 17,500.00 $ 11458.33 .5 $ 729.17 Social Dir/Ast. Admin $ 29,000,00 S 2,416.67 1 $ 2,416.67 CNA/Pers-Care Aide $ 16,200.00 $ 1,350.00 14 $ 18,900.00 Lead CNA $ 18,000.00 $ 1,500.00 3 $ 4,500.00 LPN $ 30,000.00 $ 2,500.00 4 $ 10,000.00 Chef S 28,000.00 S 2,333.33 1 $ 2,333.33 Cook $ 17,000.00 $ 1,416.67 1 $ 1,416.67 Ast. Cook $ 15,120.00 $ 1,260.00 3.5 $ 4,410.00 Housekeeper $ 15,120.00 $ 1,260.00 1.5 $ 1,890.00 Grounds/Maintename $ 17,000.00 $ 1,416.67 l $ 1,416.67 Total Personnel 32.80 S :54,545.83 Payroll Taxes 160% $ 8,72.7.33 Insurance Benefits $ 150.00 32.8 $ 4,920.00 Retirement, 3% x 900% $ 1,472.74 Consulting Dietitian $ 45.00 1 $ 45.00 Total Personnel Cost S 69,710.90 • 40 MONTH 15 Position Annual Salary Monthly #FTE Total $ Salary Months 17 months Administrator/Dir ECC $ 44,000.00 $ 3,666.67 1 $ 3,666.67 RN, 12 hours/week $38,040.00 full $ 3,166.67 .3 $ 950.00 Admin/Financial Asst. $ 23,004.00 $ 1,916.67 1 $ 1,916.67 Receptionist $ $, 1,458.33 .5 $ 729.17 Social. Dir/Ast. Admin $ �1a7,54f01.00 29,400.04 y $ 2,416.67 1 $ 2,416.674 CNA/Pers.Care Aide $ 16,200.00 $ 1,354.00 14 $ 18;900.40 Lead CNA $ 18,000.00 $ 1,540.00 3 $ 4,500,00 LPN $ 30,000.00 $ 2,500.00 4.5 $ 11,250.00 Chef $ 28,000,00 $ 2,333.33 1 $ 2,333.33 Cook $ 17,000.00 3 1,416.67 1 $ 1,416.67 Ast. Cook $ 15,120.00 $ 1,260.04 5 $ 6,300.40 Housekeeper $ 15,124.00 $ 1,260.00 1.5 $ 1,894.00 Grounds/Maintenance $ 17,000.00 $ 1,416.67 1 $ 1,416.67 Total Personnel 34.84 $ 57,685,83 Payroll Taxes 161/10 $ 9,224 73 Insurance Benefits $ 150.00 34,8 $ 5,220.00 Retirement, 3% x 94°/a $ 1,557.52 Consulting Dietitian $ 45.00 1 $ 45.00 Total Personnel Cost S 73,738,68 40 E -I MONTH 16 Position Annual Salary Monthly Salary #FTE Months Total $ 17 months Administrator/Dir ECC $ 44,000.00 $ 3,666.67 1 $ 3,666.67 RN, 12 hours/week $38,000.00 full $ 3,166.67 .3 $ 950.00 Admin/Financial Asst. $ 23,000.00 $ 1,916.67 1 $ 1,916.67 Receptionist $ 17,500.00 $ 1,458.33 .5 $ 729.17 Social Dir/Ast. Admin $ 29,000.00 $ 2,416.67 ! Is 2,416.67 CNA/Pers.Care Aide $ 16,200.00 $ 1,350.00 14.5 Is 19,575.00 Lead CNA $ 18,000.00 5 1,500.00 3 $ 4,560.00 LPN $ 30,000.00 $ 2,500.00 4.5 $ 11,250.00 Chef $ 28,000.00 $ 2,333.33 l $ 2,333.33 Cook $ 17,000.00 $ 1,416.67 1 $ 1,416.67 Ast. Cook $ 15,120.00 $ 1,260.60 5 $ 6,300.00 Housekeeper $ 15,120.00 $ 1,260.00 1.5 $ 1,890.00 Grounds//Maintenance $ 17,000.00 $ 1,416.67 1 $ 1,416.67 Total Personnel 35,3{} $ 58,360.83 Payroll Taxes 16% $ 9,337.73 Insurance Benefits $ 150.00 35.3 $ 5,295.00 Retirement, 3% x 90% $ 1,575,74 Consulting Dietitian $ 45.00 1 $ 45.00 Total Personnel Cost $ 74,614,31 +i i THREE PALMS OF SEBASTIAN MONTHLY FULL. OPERATING BUDGET 1.999 dollars/rates, 63 of 70 beds occupied Personnel $74,614.00 Utilities, garbage $7,020.00 Telephone (w 1 cell), 2 pagers $450,0{1 Cable, 3 common rooms, 2 respite rooms $200.00 Lawn, building maintenance, extermination $1,500,00 Mortgage costs, prjacopk $29,118.00 FCC with. FNA Ist: 7.8%, 40 years, $4,279,860 insurance 2nd mortgage: 4%, 20 years, $550,000 CDBG $3,333.00 CDBG Loam furnishings/equipment CDBG $1,914.00 CDBG 4%, 7 years, $140,000 Food ($5.25/bed x 63 x 30.5 days, $10,088) $11,674.00 plus employee meals ($2 x 26 x 30.50, $1586) Management fees, CRA (payroll services, etc.) $3,300,00 Delay until month 18 Management fees, other $2,000.00 Training, travel $400.00 $650 first 14 months Advertising & marketing (includes personnel ads) $1,400.00 Cleaning, maintenance & laundry supplies $ 700.00 (includes paper products, linen replacements) Resident materials & entertainment $1,100.00 Furnishings/equipment replacement, $162,500/ 7 $2,390.00 Delay until month 18. years, paid in 68 months* Building & equipment replacement, $10,563.00 Delay until month 18 $3,000,000/25 years, paid in 284 months* Supplies, office $440:00 �lp,srauuilding $1,300.00 nsurance, liability $780.00 — • 0 During the initial 17 month period of operation, no replacement fund will be paidlreserved. This full operating budget includes a cash reserve for building and fixed equipment replacement on a 25 year schedule, and furniture and equipment over 7 years, These reserve fund payments will begin in month 18, the second month of full (90%) occupancy, at a rate to achieve full payment by the end of the appropriate period. The management services to be provided by CRA Care Centers, Inc. (personnel, payroll, accounts receivable./payabie, corporate filings, general oversight, etc.) will be provided but not billed during the initial 17 months of operation in order to reduce cash operating losses. Billing will begin at month 18. 40 40 11 00 kA t1ip Lh Lh kA LA CA pfnpfJh t.A co wo W LA id LA on L C) & -00 " tA kA 0 00 C) go a 00 6A '4 to ct, LA �A w ia Lh 0 a, DO LA Q (;D CD 0 CP 0 00 cz� EPS L6 4A iA tow CA g <> C$ ONO O tA 00 S I ff Cl O 00 C> C;> O 0 0 Q iA C. 00 G cr ul 64 �•! H9 bq I, fA (1) . . 1� . CT H LA 6o-3 EA 6R vs 61 qq uj pp -L,3 C, CD SG tA Ck C� 8 LA LA C *0 ul kA Un00 -49 W CD 0 U3 09 4�- '-j C.3 L� kA CJ 0 C7 Q C) Q C3 69 rt r4 11)"LA -j .Q--4 C, f -j C} C) 00 C� CD. fA r. Q 0 4=1 t -j �n 4� 10C 1 0% w 00 LA Q o O00LS w ¢ 4A j 4A �j I n n 43 _J n OL tj tp.,rJ ppm N p ''AL3Ny p O 'Q O f7 4 rgj S7 f3 W O CD oo x..} � V9 (� 49 fr�f fA W71 £Pi Erk 6R TMilj to W; O oCD ',p (ii ,�t1 � p p •A ry �a� C7 SCJ N r L w 1*1 Ln Cl p v . ON LO }O w c_ A 4n C? © e 6f'! .3 C7 p A W .-. x, � T (raj b9 iA h} 4q N inn t-S 4i N O Deo t+. Cj O � A A '[y 4'7 69 N {v7 f/J b1 EA kA CA N N uIj x Ci o N � iA 5rr, -tIjw'N 4rJi �- D G O p Cn [+. 4.i rxa oo x C7 cl � � b9 6� 49 N9 6`7 6A i/7 C,FI ff3 69 i+/7 GE! y} 5✓3 bx7 "1v0 S O 11y p1-0 v •.i, to .p, .� W � b4 L'4 ffJ V9 6rr 69 ifl N W4 u,pq T .-. µ CN 9 p O QO 44 oc 49 Vi :fi ,C E/i frr N F/r 69 44 69 49 69 Eff b9 lA �r O ¢ 'b. 'O O 'C�7 'aG 1,J �{7 C N K,x. •�''� o a O O O In A L] oo 44 u j l � '.D 1 'n to N N 6q 49 (Ab4 f{7 b4 4 N c 177 c c5 �• •'+,^+ i Vii F. s 1 m [� G C7 G� �F: ii} _ .—. CD x Ji cl 44 3 a cin ' M N J j' w b9 49 ff7 :J9 p ,-] r J c7 Cl C7 oo p 'k7 Vii LA A y W Do � N N FA � 69 4r9 4x7 4A O t7 tj oo A N N 4,r to iH <r4 4xY 6xY 4i7 p Lr,SrR ,;pVic: 'D i.J ;a t.,J C p p A x J G] Q CJ C? C7 C7 A G7 oo p c ig p c> 4r7 p Z, 7' '49 6 V/ 6A b9 Rr til til iA W# 'EA V! 4x7 y!i 41 N N 4r'1 A 6r! N} `! �a © n ilj S U fl C7 ti _ r-jtA �j I f Ell r o o m ° N o o 0 a a 'n n os a r n 6s r [}! a 59 N CA 69 ry LH m rfl cA E:9 mrti 66 (A 05 Vn n ff} 69 C (V) N rry Y lam- 4 a �7 O C n r-- N ry M --� .... f7 TJ �' t• --� p N el O QC O e'D @ 4a q 4 66 rA fA 6/> 6q 69 4q ;Oi 44 6H 4�i �Q}- Gq d'9 6H 6+s a? � � � � � � Qp 4 O N t�•1 � bA Fr3 6P 69 5.9 Vi 6t1 [<1 :R 69 r s 64 idi (A 69 w IT 00 O� ,� O ep ... trv, �N� ems} i 5 k9 4�tt V�3 i+`1 6�9 69 6A V3 b f 6+i f.9 (t] i+!! if1 oo V m 'TC? 4 [ri 69 6A 64 6A 6r7 i/f 6t1 Wf 6fl fJy 4+l 4r! 6q Vi � CA K - 00 - r ? cr, 1 a a a c Z ;7 t IT C>'k U6 {e5 4:1 Lfi 4R V) (A s rY fH Ni &6 69 sfi of Vf dT G !`1 — G. a C--•-� r-} fwd +p r- Nc q 4: Gry Q V3 FA V, En 44 srH Ws 69 Vt 6R ffl 69 V)' t/3 64 l G rai U W u V' c a a w ti G BUDGET Month Month Month Mantle Monti, Month Month Month ITEM 17 l8$ 19$ 20$ 21$ 22S 23S 24$ Repl. $0 $2,390 $2,390 $2,390 $2,390 $2,390 $2,390 Replace., build $0 $10,563 $10,563 $10,563 $10,563 $10,563 $10,563 L$2,390furn/equip Office supplies $440 $440 $440 $440 $440 $440 $440 $440 Insurance,build $1,300 $1„300 $1,300 $1,300 $1,300 $1,300 $1,300 $1,300 Insurance, $780 $780 $780 $780 $780 $780 $780 $780 Liabil Accounting $500 $500 $500 $500 $500 $500 $500 $500 License,registr $650 $650 $650 $650 $650 $650 $650 $650 a Postage $250 $250 $250 $250 $250 $250 $250 $250 ]Agai $100 $100 $100 $100 $100 $100 $100 $100 Memberships $325 $325 $325 $325 $325 $325 $325 $325 2 vans $2,750 $2,750 $2,750 $2,750 $2,750 $2,750 $2,750 $2,750 Property taxes $7.000 57,000 $7,000 $7,000 $7,000 $7,000 $7,000 $7,000 Copier service $400 $400 $400 $400 $400 $400 $400 $400 TOTAL EXP $153,119 5166,1171 $166.071 $166,071 S166,071 $166,071 $1661,071 $166,071 TOTAL REV $177,403 $177,403 $177,403 $177,403 5177,403 $177,403 5177,403 '$177,403 MARKETING PIAN GRA Care Centers, Inc. will contract with a marketing consultant after the construction contract is executed with the general contractor. The marketing consultant will develop marketing materials and a detailed marketing plan, with input from the management consultant and the facility administrator, Much of the actual marketing will then be done by the administrator and other staff, who will have some training by the marketing consultattt. The administrator will spend a large amount of her/his time prior to opening on tasks such as marketing and pre -leasing- On going marketing will continue throughout operation of the facility. A total Of $70,000 is budgeted for marketing prior to opening, and approximately $1,000 per month is budgeted for continuing marketing_ RESUME OF KYLE LOCKBY PROPOSED MANAGEMENT CONSULTWr FOR THREE PALMS OF SEBASTIAN • • 14enkins ockebyAssociates, Inc. 410 N. Halifax Avenue P.O. Box 15078 • Daytona Beach, Florida 32115 Telephone (904) 257.1772 • FAX (904) 258-1903 KYLE E. LOCKF_BY, 3R. f-_l:FaC--walm-:9494It Sim Nji'sing home administration and operation, banking, financial consultant, governmental advisor,developer of Health Care Facilities and Retirement Communities l*s9Pfta12ls1;M Prescnt CEO and owner of Jenkins/Lockeby At:4pCiaLes, Inc., specializing in the administration, management. management. development and construction of health care and resident cart facilities. At the present time Jenkins/Lockeby manages and administers five (5) facilities. This varies from time to time.) 1970 TO With my brother, we own Huntington Square Present Convalarium located in Daytona Beach, Florida. We are presently planning a replacement: for this facility. It will be a model for the ?l.t Century. 1475 to Trustee since 1973 For two (r) Episcopal Lifts l' ? Care Facilities. Retired in may of 1993 from thii. board. president of Florida !association of °elF Insurance, an educational/lobbyist association, with a membership of over 150 companies involved ill al'. f.3tet-- of wor kers ' �: U rfl p l? I I•..3 t i^v ll. '�•h� __ A-sSociate if =Jy. Wheel— .1 .411em:,n, 1n,_.. Orlando, F1•:,rina .an i:lv� ;*.RlNllt 3.Ij_ `in,,rlrri.;i advisor arll', _r•I r• :i.? i"a,o The firm 3GtCa Is fl .n.." i_ * . 1....,.�I"z :aC.}LIs municipal i t> , anvi mlir+l i,%•.:! : }r q'.aY.l"}n� r r m CON5111.TANTS AND MANAGERS FOR nF TIREMFNT CENTERS AND ItMTH CARE FACIL17IFS C3 • OirecLor of the Cocoa Beach State Hank in the 1950's and 1,?60*s. Founder and Director of Lhe Citizens Ban} of Lehigh Acres in the 1960'x. Fouoder and Director of the Brevard State. Bank. Served on Board of Directors of several other banking institutions. 1458 to Management Consultant from Decembter 1953 to early 1962 1962. 1950 Developer of a retail merchallji.::ing operation conducting business in 24 r;ommuniLjets. with approximately 300 employees. Education: Tennessee Military Institute, Sweetwater, TN Riverside Military Academy, Gainesville, GA Bryant College, Providence, RI, Honorary Degree Personal: Married, two children, five grandchildren, two gr,3at grand children. Additional information available upon request. Sre .addendum for fn-,, rel.-3ted experienc+e•; .and communit/ service activities. r I KYLE E. LOCKEBY , JR. ADDENDUM Related experiences and Community Service Activities= 1. Administrator of record for a 232 bed Health Care facility for 1 112 rears. Rebuilt ai.d reorganized for my client after they brought it out of bankruptcy. Operated entire management team throughout rebuilding for approximately two years. 2. Trustee & member of the Executive Committee of two Episcopal Life Care Center and Nursing Hama from 1973 to retiring in 1993. 3. Member of Board of Governors of 274 bed hospital in 1960's. a. Fi-;cal Consultant a Investment Banker for 12 years. S. Chairman for the Board of Examiners of 'Nursing Howie Administrators for the State of Florida. (twice, for a total of 11 1/2 yrs service.) Presently again serving on this Board 6. Treasurer of the National Board of Examiners of Nursing Home Administrators and a member of the Executive Board. (Middle 1970';), 7, Member of the Nati�:)nal Board Committee entailing the compilation of the national examination as used and 1--�Quired by all SO states for the purpose of licensure *f nursing home administrators. Member of Wealth. System; Agency for four (4) different terms in two (2 ) different systems. r. Member Florida Health Care Association, since 1969. 1 _ r�r-mt �1 r�m�_r:yarr Health Carl. Association since 196'x. Committee on Health Certifying Cr-�311 .'I-eqe of fj—'F f ...,1 � I f R. t"Yr. � �1—f fl I, - I r'141 x_•311 -,-)r 11. • . -f_ • •' yl , fl•} J f .. i f r � . � 11i r �.a1 V�i..Y � {- •+ :I 40 71 i 15. licensed Nursing Home Administrator since inception of Licensure Program, 16. Expert witness and consultant to Lhe DePartm2nt of PTofessiotlal Regulations. ,From 1981 to Present. ;d 17. Consultant, Health Council„ Daytona Seach Community College. Civic Organizations: Rotary International, (Paul Harris Fri low), Life McRmber U.S. Jaycees, United Way, Charnbes- of Commerce, Civic Improvement Board and others. Civic Awards: Walter M. Johnson memorial for distinguished service to the Association and its Members. Rotary International Paul Harris Fellow (twice). Chairs "Award of Excellence" Presented by the Chairman of the American College of Health Care Administrators in 1'?` 6 . Further, 3enkins/Lockeby Associates, has been in business since 1973, first as a Partnership and later converted into a Florida corporation. Jenkins / L•Dckeby has been a cl..)selx held corporation 5incL- that print in time. During the ._ovr Le of the oper ar- iun of the 7enkins/Lor>keb-t, 1 havr b,:�elt invr�,lved in th,_- man.a�rrnel�r nY;t :•nl:f of .nr .wr' fac;lit,•1 but Z he JGer3tl,,n a multi 3 .1.t1 -is 1n �.i _R�3. ]•+nkin-L I I_ _only 78 differ-nr and : 11E,_ t_v., °a• i 1. _ie FurttlFr , ww- av ,ner_3t _ p ,,are Far(l l r .naCY to 5GC.- 3ng' n•�irlym •.gni t- . -'='' .!•Cl •7nt.•.: al j +3f �34lV+u1 rrr,,r - a �,._ r -.l J -''�1 r • r-'." hay ;L'a4 �'! J! :. . '_I'i )!IL< •I. fl { - .-r-a _.._ I _ In 9 !-, .!')•.elrl w: I•. j - a. . s1 R V . ! j11 4D E-A • 10111395 101+1395 bb; u:+ 'JU48y Jubya Puumkl.l t� NA( . u kk.1l.R`1k.IL 1 S f �74ai_ 4. SECTION I SPECIFIC FR -M-CT— E-SIBILITY verview Contained in tliis section are the details regarding the specific project feasibility analysis for z the absorption of a state-of-the-art assisted living community being considered for dcvelopmcnt at a site in Sebastian, Florida. Field work and analysis for this engagement was completed in December, 1997; therefore, the analysis and conclusions contained herein reflect market conditions as of that time frame, Following is a detailed discussion of the ,penetration rate/demand analysis for this living arrangement. Professional Market Feasibility Opiniag Based upon The quantitative results of this detailed market feasibility study and KIDS' significant national experience in evaluating successfutSeaior housing communities, it (sour specific opinion that the proposed assisted living arrangement (as defined herein) is feasible in the Sebastian PMA from a quantitative perspective. Our analysis indicates there is sufficient size and depth of the market to support the number of assisted living units recommended and evaluated for the Primary Market Area. This opinion considers both existingaad platinedlannounced competltfon aswell as unit turnover- the re-filllugofexisting occupied units due to natural resident Attrition that will occur at mature competitive communities. t= It i 40 11111110 C] 9 I oil V111"'4 00: U1 'JUOU'Jaua7a KLUVt L 1:3 f°'04%P_ tl,* Summary of Rearmed Ave 75+ Penetration Ates for t ie Assisted L3�"ink Units Penetration tes - Trends and f3+toe4mark3 - While there are no firm industry standards for maxnnuin acceptable penetration rates for an individual project in a specific market area, an industry figure of approximately 5% (market penetration) has evolved overtime and is generally considered an acceptable market/development risk for independent loin units. 71ris"evolution" has generally been based on the following: w 6=0 households (the age screen is now considered to be age 75+) + Little income screening • No sophisticated competitive analysis technique Now:, with more detailed and pragmatic demographic screert'ing, it is the opinion ofMDS that this 5% penetration is both conservative and an acceptable markctldevelopment risk indicator • for indep2ndent linin units. A@sisted Living PenetratiaRate s -Assisted living penetration rates, however, are expected to be higher than independent living penetration rates for any one project due to the fact that assisted living typically involves a more highly need -driven situation and the typical age profile for residents r in assisted living is age 75 to 80 or older. Because the potential pool of prospects fee assisted living is more limited than that for independent living (age 75+ wid has a need for assistance in daily living t+ a sen -ices), MDS' experience shows that a higher percentage of this pool of prospects opt for the I availability ofsuch services. MDS has conducted a number of studies across the nation with freestanding assisted living facilites, as uckl as assisted living integrated with utdcpandenr living, and nursing, lndividuA usisted living project ptwtctration rates in v,anous markets have ranpc l fronts 1% to 7% It is our opinion that, due #o these actu*Ip roject penetrattao rafts and industry tfit sdsrd+ abet let, fen dB; Uy Y04t JJOby4 h'Ulir'k_i_ 1'_, 1 "'A ')-. EXHIBIT 1.1 SUMMARY 4F REQUIRED AGE 75+ ASSISTED LIVING PENETRATION RATS IN THE PRIMARY MAR+�C�T AREA lPMA1 1999 Time Frame y 60 Assisted _ . Factors/Assumptions _ Living Units Total New Units to be Developed 60 Units Less Vacancy Factor of 7% Lj Sublotal 56 Estimated Percentage of Units to be Absorbed From the PMA )(70% Net Units Required to be Absorbed Within PMA 39 Estimated Absorption From Age 75+ Households x 100% Total Units to be Absorbed in PMA 39 Required Age 75+ Penetration rates Eased on Qualifying Aftdr-Tax Cash Flow Income and the Estimated Impact of Home Equity: • @ $40,000+' Total Units to be Absorbed In PMA 39-2.0% Net Age/Income +Qualified. Households 1,915 • @ 545,000+' Total 'Units to be Absorbed In PMA _ ,39 = 2.4% Net AgelIncome Qualified Households 1,642 • @ $50,000+' Total Units to be Absorbed In PMA _ _39 = 2.8% Not Ago/Income Qualified Households 1,374 80 Assisted Living Un�ks 80 Units 10 74 xx70% 52 x 100% 52 _52 ^ 2.7% 1,915 --U • 3.2% 1,642 _� = 3.811,16 1,374 Source, MOS Analysis 'Reto to Fxhlbds A-1 through A-6 in ADpvnd x A of mis roprsrt -'or the detaJad 41%,stod tninq penetrabon rete' rpo"s JJirC.L It' and other professlOaRls typically evaluate, acceptable penetration rates for assisted living should not exceed G% w7% of the avollabte Age and income qualified households in a market a rea. As ca® be seen in Fxhiblt 1-1, the required age 75+ penetration rates for 60 assisted living units at the proposed development range Froin 2.0% to 2.8°x„ based on minimum qualifying income screens ranging frorti 540,040 to 550,00(} ,and assuming 70% absorptlon from the VNIA, Exhibit I-1 also evaluates the penetration Mites for a larger project - 8o assisted living units. The required age 75+ PMA penetration rates for tills unit configuration ranges from 2.7% to 3.7% - based an the same assumptions outlined above. The penetration rates reflected in Exhibit I-1 arc based on boar qualifying cash now income and (tic estimated impact of home equity in the Greater Sebastian arca. 1t is the opinion of MDS (bat the penetration rates for hoth'suit count scenarios In lbe Sebastian PNtA are conservative, realistic and within acceptable and recognized industry stiindnrds. Appendix A of this report contains the detailed supporting penetration rate models used to calculate the assisted living penetration rates. It should be: noted that these penctration rates are expressed in the 1799 time frarrre - consistent with the estimated tinic frarne for the proposed project to be ready for occupancy and absorption of units. SY-A5stiyrnjWq€rs 1RY91vg- u the VC111-ttafwn R3te fit: MdeEs 771e approach to market feasibility determination for assisted living units involves the following pragmatic sequrlitial, scfccrung process I The estimated number of 1999 age 75+ tautt.lnttitutl'onalized houseboldt 4s first detcrrrrined a 01/01/1995 08:09 904893LE94 Rt7UWL1S PAGE 06 ?.. Age quallfied Senior households are (lien adjusted to include only those iucotne qualified households based on cash flow income atone ' (exclusive of economic sul)portby children). MDS also considered the impact of home equity in the Primary Market Area. 3. Senior houscholes currently residing in existing independent and assisted living units are subtracted from the pool of age and income qualified prospects. Competitive units arc backed out at two different levels - before and after the unique income screening for the subject community based upon the estimated required qualifying household income for residents living at the coriumnities. 4. Vacant and annedlannounced independent and .assisted living units are "filled" to 95% occupancy. It is presumed (hat all planned competition and vacant units would achieve stabilized occupancy before evaluating prospects for the prognosed community. 5. Annual turnover at 40% for assisted living is calculated and subtracted for existing occupied living units. This factor accounts for units at existing projects that will aced to be refilled or reoccupied during the same fill -up time frame as (lie .subject project. The bottom-line result ofthis analysis and screening process is to identify the net pool of age and income qualified Senior households who are potential prospects for the subject project, The required penetration rate for a project is then calculated by dividing; (lie number of units to be absorbed in the market area by the number of net potential agelincortae qualified " households in (list market area. Figure 1-1 presents a graphic depicting the penetration. rateldemand model. (Defer to Exhibit 1-1 and Appendix A for the detailed penetration rate calculations) l:ev [lernarld MocieE_ i �'arjgbJes . Key input variables to the penetration rate/demand models L included: 1. The total number of units to be absorbed. MOS has vvilowd the pcnr1rauon rates for the fullownig unit counts: • dQ Assistrrl Living Liths 80 A%%olyd t i%ing units i i 11 C] 11"D 1i0. V? 3U403ZVO"1w rLAA,�L,: , .«,,,L U, FIGURE 1-1 PENETRATION RATEIDEMAND MODEL FOR ASSISTED LIVING Gross Non -Institutionalized - Age 75 + Households Less Existing and Planned AL Units Requiring Qualifying Cash Flow Incomes lower than Subject Project Less Existing Independent Living Units Subtotal Available I Grass Age 75+ Households I Apply Qualifying Income Screen I Subtotal Available Age and Income Qualified Households Occupied Units VacanVPlanned Units @ 95% Occupancy Unit Turnover @ 40% Less Existing and Planned AL Occupied Units Units Requiring Comparable or Vacant/Planned Units Higher Cash Flow Income 96% Occupancy Net Available Agelinwme Unit Turnover '@ 4o% Qualified Households Factor In Home Equity Impact Number of Qnits to Be Absa d in_kMA Net Available Age/Inc me Qualified Households Project Penetration Rate �4r� rf [1lvtltii}':IrJ �tr�� ri 4�c a Olt VI i 1779 tit): U7 °aU4tl7sUbI4 r%.XPrtt, a I 4r— LI c. I The appropriate qualifying cash flow Income cohorts (S40,N0,W,000 and 550,000) were evaluated to insure that only those Senior households who could afford to private pay the monthly service fees were considered.. 3 The assumption is that 70% of the absorption would conte from the Primary Market Area. 'fisc remaining unit absorption is anticipated to come from Secondary and Tertiary -Market Areas which would be considered any areas outside the defined Primary Market Area, including the remainder of the State of Florida and in -migration fxom outside the state. 4. The proposed new project will be brought to a stabilized 43% occupancy. N addition to the previous input variables, tate penetration rate model also assumed that 100% of the assisted living absorption would be by the age 75+ cohort. While there could be sonic Seniors under the age of 75 who would be a candidate for this subject development, MDS has excluded the majority of tate under age 75 cohort for forecasting safety margin. Penetration Rates For Alzheimer's Reds Consideration is also being given to dedicating 20 of the units to Alzheimet'sfdententia care units in an assisted living/residential care setting. These units would offer similar services and amenities as would be provided forthe assisted living residents; however, the personal care services would be more frequent/intensive and the physical space would be specially designed to be secure } and to effectively care for the spceial nectislrcquire:nents of these residents. n To date, there is no univcrsally accepted and standardized demand ntrtltodology for projecting the need for Alzheimer's beds in a market area. MDS, however, has conducted a sifirtiticant amount of inremal research and development anis has developed a tnedel which is conservative. realistic and gives Consideration to all of the relevant l,ry fit to;s ind assumptions with vcgmd to this very specialized type of living arrrttgerrient M +! IjLk-ML i b PAGE 6� used on our national expenence, we have observed the penetration rates for tnditional assisted living and nursing beds for the age 75¢ cohort as follows: • Assisted Living/Personal Care 6% to 7% 0 Nursing Beds 12% to 14% The living arrangement and service deliver} system provided by an Atzheimer's facility will be more highly need driven than the other more traditional Senior living arrangements - requiring highly specialized and more. intensive ,personal care services. The penetration rate for a 20 -bed Alzheimer's care unit in the Sebastian PMA is 3.7% (see Exhibit 1-2 for the detailed penetration rate model), 1t is the opinion of MDS that this is on the low side of the range of penetration rates that tie have observed in other similar market areas - and it is an acceptable and conservative penetration rate for this living arrangement and lifestyle. Our interviews with Senior housing and health care professionals in the Greater Sebastian area as well as across the nation indicate that there is a significant need for this specializcd type of care. They fur.her indicated that much of this need is not for skilled nursing care, but for a sale, r secure, dignified residential environment such as that being suggested for the subject community. •t evices, to Pro►-icied Basic Services - The monthly service fees proposed for the subject assisted living community will cover a full array of eongregatclsheltered living services including, bur not limited to, the fallowing. IND • • 0 ftJUMLL I5 EXHIBIT 1.2 rrx: 1 tl MAR-I—PEMA R r RELATED QFMENTIA Ul1AI IN AN_ASSISTED LIV NG r_r1M $50,000 + Income FACTORS / ASSUMPTIONS 75%. PMA IN THE PRIMARY MARKET AREA (PMA)Absorption Impact 1. Estimated 1999 Non. Institutionalized Age 75+ Households a 6.893 2. Less Households Residing In. • Independent Living (687) • Assisted Living (33fr} s Subtotal 5.870 3, Estimated level of Incidence of Dementia a 0.246 Subtotal • Dementia Level of Incidence 1,444 4. Qualifying Income Screen. $50,000 t a 0.243 Subtotal Income Qualified Households 351 5. Additional Agellncome Qualified Households Available Due to Impact of Home SaleJEquity 4 31 Subtotal Equity Adjusted Households 382 6. Less Occupied AlzheimeeslDementia Units 0 7. Less Vacant and Planned AlzheirneeslDementia Units (@55% Occupancy) 0 8. Less Annual Turnover of Occupied Units @ 40% 0 9. Net Potential Prospects for Aizheimees Facility 382 10. COMP 1 fABQN OF REQUMEt] EENETRATIOMJR_A Subjecit Proposed Units to ba Absorbed s 14 Potential Qualified Households 382 PROJECT PENETRATION RATES (for 20 units) K Source: Moore Diversified Services. Inc. ClaritasiNPDC iTtrese are non-ir4litutionalued housetvVds • does not include persons x in nursing hoovs or insitutionAred group quarters. rinfomtation provided by The Alchemwes Disease and ReMled D+sorders AsSamooWn. Inc i Tho lnudenoe trivet is a weVhlad avursQe of tw * ego oolw As - age 75(a 84 and 85 rRchor to ExtuW U-+1 in Appww*s B, .Rofer Io Ex!# 1-Ia • sopfind lavel 0 uxWonce and aisunwd thal arty bO% at these rws,dMnth, brtrukl be cw" dew.*y loom Vw Qwm lhopvw z 93% iy-c44no . 75% e+alprptco t Won tr $AA a 14 u o t 1-9 19T3 utr. ny n1J4U 1jbb!$q rw,.,r.' . _ f -'K. . . • Three meals per day • Weekly housekeeping - • Weekly flat laundry services • Personal laundry service • 24-hour security, including regular security checks and monitoring of emergency pull cords • MaintenanceJrepair - interior and exterior • Utilities, except phone and premium TV cable service • Scheduled transportation • Scheduled activities program r?eiai Asslstanre in D it Llvin Af1Ls - In addition to the above services, the assisted living monthly service fees will also cover an array of assistance svith daily living activities including: • Supervision of regular, routine medications • Assistance with bathing/showers twice weekly • Assistance with meal sct-up, supen°ision in dining room and tray service to roam, if necessary • Daily wakeup • Daily assistance with dressing s Daily light straightening of rooms ■ Monthly blood pressure and weight check More details regarding the recommended services and amenities will be outlined in Section 2 of this report. fngome Qualifying Criteria I Seniors typically spend up to 65% of their annual cash now income on market rate monthly service fees or rental rates for independent living, 75% to 60% for assisted living monthly service fees and 85% for nursing or health care. The remaining }portion of their income is used for personal rM items such as clothing, toiletries, medications, etc. and activities outside of the Scnior lis ing, e community Srcial_Lksslsted .Lwjrt orcin %-r ider_ atloea - It should he nn+ed that the need for some of Lthese drscictronny purrhrscs decreases ss the Senior becornesF more fruit and requires higher levels 6 ME 40 • ffrl041A 7 urs:ua 7uut79ut�7w r„ ,r•k,L�.� r..a� ,: Of support services, such as assisted living, Alzheimer's care and nursing, As clic residents age and become more frail, the frequency and intensity of services required typically increase and additional services may by needed (i.e_ assistance with ainbulation, monitoring of conf sscdlwandering resicicni, assistance with groom inoiyviene, etc.). Ulicn this need for increased assistance in daily living occurs, the Seniors lifestyle - of necessity - becomes much more limited. Those Seniors with severely limited lifestyles can obviously dedicate a larger portion of their discrctionarylavailable income for services. Under these conditions, a Senior in assisted living can actually exceed the 75% to 80% of income criteria. structs f the Assists LivinE Monthly Senates Fee The specific monthly service fees for the subject assisted living units may represent a combination of a fee for "shelter," canpreg;ate services and a base level of assisted living; services. There will also be incremental add-on costs for varying increasing levels of assistance indaily living. These add-on, a la cartc charges Would be determined for each individual resident and revised as their conditions change. This is a strategy which is currently being evaluated and implemented by a number of assisted living ownerloUeratots in tlae Sebastian Primary Market Arca as well as across the nation and should be considered by the Development Team. MDS is available to braittstarrn various ways to implement this price tienng strategy with the Devclopnient'teatn. In order to evaluate the affordability levels and the size and depth of the market to s accommodate this price tiering strategy, MISS considered not only the minimum quahfying, income cnteria roe the reconirnended base assisted living pncing, but also considered additional srenanos of increasing qualifying household incomes [this been NlIDS' nalmnyl experience that the mcircue in pricing at communities that wr uWittng clic he d ,pricing stratevy kn ually tanges from +$300 to L C-] 7 011 J04by3ub3- hUJMLLIb Nlkat 1.3 $400 per month for each detorted level of additional services. Fach '$5,000 in incremental increase in a Scnior consumers annual income: will support approximately 5300 to $400 in increased monthly service fees, lculat on of Minimupil` u Hing Card F.v income for arkate ottthly kteutal Rates Exhibit 1-3 presents the minimum qualifying cash flaw income requircrnents for the proposed assisted living community. These requirements are based on the recommended monthly service fees. The recommended monthly fees for carII of the unit types have been annualized and then the earlier stated expenditure factor of 75% for assisted living (arid 85% for Alzheimer's care) was applied to the annualized monthly fees - resulting in the total annual cash flow reyuircrnents After taxes. Art average tax rate of 15% of Senior householders' incomes was then factored in - resulting in the required annual cash flow be[M taxes. Based on this analysis, it is the opinion of MDS that the minlrnutn qualifying rash flow income criteria for the subject assisted living units, as currently concei Td, will lie $40,000 to $45,000 • in 1999 dollars. Sources of lncotng - Typical sources of cast, flow income for Seniors include Social Security, ' savings and pensions. Other sources of income include Investments to stocks, bonds, commodities r. and real estate - and possibly other types of investments. 'rhe income (Tont these investments are b pan of the reported income that MDS uses in establishing ilia age- vcrsus-inconiescreening criterion. There are two additional categories of income sources which MDS does fLo.S inc1ucle to our analysis as we do not feel they are valid qualifiers. 1-hcsc include actual spend down of p6iwtpal assets of the Senior and the possible financial sup;poil by family meruben. While both of these "sources of cash'" certainly exist • it is our opinion that they are not an appropriate cum ideratrort in ratablrt'hinr3 market feasibility. MDS' analpxts assumes that the pvmertttal anti ate p4v ttroogvcts have 1 t.l: +.,UI'IILY- Y 1 Total Units Weighfad Average 40 DouhLe_Qg.gW_! _CY: One Bedroom -Charge for married couple - only one requires ADL services • Per occupant, if unrelated persons and both require ADL services $2,160 - $25,920 - $34,560 - $40,659 - $2,360 $28,320 $37,760 $44,424 $2,950 - EXHIBIT 1.3 $47,200 - $55,529 - $3,750 MINI l+ LSM 9VIA1.l YlNG CASH_Fl4 Yv-L 4 9�_E�EQUIREA+L E�E48 $70,588 $4,625 - $19,500 - $26,000 - Based on Monthly Service Fees in 1999 $2,025 $24,300 $32,400 '438,1113 Total Annual Required Annualized Cash Flaw Annual Number Monthly Monthly Requirement Gash Flow Unit Type- of Units Feet Fee After Taxi Before Taxa !. Assist.�.i.Yg�+ tt�s Studio 24 $2,000 - $24,000 - $32,000 $37,647 - $2„200 $26,400 $35,200 $41,412 One Bedroom 16 $2,400 - $28,800 $38,400 $45,176 - $2,600 $31,200 $41,600 $48,941 Total Units Weighfad Average 40 DouhLe_Qg.gW_! _CY: One Bedroom -Charge for married couple - only one requires ADL services • Per occupant, if unrelated persons and both require ADL services $2,160 - $25,920 - $34,560 - $40,659 - $2,360 $28,320 $37,760 $44,424 $2,950 - $35.400 - $47,200 - $55,529 - $3,750 $45,000 $60,000 $70,588 $4,625 - $19,500 - $26,000 - $30.588 - $2,025 $24,300 $32,400 '438,1113 �i. Aixh±'innet�LS,tte�Ial 6 5ludio 20 $2.950 - $35,400 - 'S41.&W $48.997 $3,450 $41,400 $48,706 $57.301 i LYRates ara basad ors single ocripancy in 1999 dotlws. LUsurned 75.0% of the Seniors' cash flow income can ba sllocatW lot, assisted living and 85 0% can be allocated for W,eftioncesisptodal carie. R-,��rrn".L 3r gar rir� ln,r ia1a of 15 0% . 1 40 7-1 r SYAF 41I AI7j GCT, 4J ZIUMQ J.)UL:ti ML"'PLL 17 i •-. sr i sufficient annual cash flow tncorttc to pay the proposed monthly service fees in perpetuity - adjusted for reasonable and modest inflation. Liquidation of home Frtru'r�t r+ - Seniors also have another significant financial resource available to them - the equity in their home. Seniors age 754• who live in a single f'trnily home generally have paid the mortgage off and own the home free and clear. This home equity, when liquidated and prudently invested, represents a significant source of additional cash flow income for malty Seniors. it should be noted that MDS evaluates affordability for Senior housing co unities based an cash flow income and also gives consideration to the impact of home equity for those Seniors who do s own a home. irnnact_of-Honij Eq ui • Exhibits 1-43 and 1-4b outline a home equity analysis in which the minimum qualifying income criteria could be reduced (for those Seniors selling their hornes) due to annual cash flow that would result frorn the sale of a horse in the Greater Sebastian area and the reinvestment of the net, after-tax sales proceeds. This analysis estimates the number of additional households (whose actual incomes are k]elo%v $40,000) who would be qualified at this level, assuming they could sell their horse and invest the net equity proceeds at 6%. This would allow a these Seniors to supplement their income, with the interest earnings, while leaving, the principal f oin ¢ the sale of their [ionic intact and in their portfolio of assets for their estate. e C-.'onsid of1on oft}le!COM e(ItIgU r l' MDS typically conducts an analysis in which the estimated required qualifying household income rntei m is calculated for each of the competitive facilities. MDS takes the average monthly service (cc for each ofthc corrtpctrtive assisicd living facilities an:l then applies the appropriate factor r t. 7L14D D-Jub 314 KuiA•k.r r _s ' • - a L EXHIBIT iia How the Sale of a Senior's Nome in the Primary Market Area Increases the Number of Age and Income Qualified Households 1 1997 Estimated Median Home Value , $ 95,000 Il. Assume Net Home Equity Proceeds Upon Sale @ 90% $ 85,500 III. Assume Equity Proceeds Can Be Invested @ 6% Z $5.130 /Year Pre -Tax Increase in Investment Income IV. Required Qualifying CASH FLOW Income Criteria $40,000 $45,000 $50,000 (Before Home Equity Conversion) • Less Increase in Equity Investment Income $5,134 $5,130 $5,130 V. ,Home Equity Cash Flow Lowers Quali!yinq Income Criteria to: $34,870 $39,870 $44.P-6 _Age 75+1 Income Screens - 40,640 45600 50,000 VI. NET Age 75+ Qualified Households t 6,572 6,572 6.572 Vll. ADDITIONAL Age Qualified Households that Became Income Qualified 294 289 289 rill. Percent of Age 75+ HOMEOWNERS in the PMA '@ 86.8% Net Increase in AGE/INCOME QUALIFIED Homeowners 255 251 251 Due to Home Equity Conversion Impact , Additional Households Converting (Selling) home equity results in increased savings, poiffelio value and investment income. This increases the number of ago/ income qualified households. Refer to t=xhibit 1-4b for a more detailed explanalion of this analysis. Source: Moore Diversified Services, Inc. Analysis ` «Based on 1 '90 Census Date for Seniors and an analysis of residential /ware sales statistics, tAverage over a throe (3) to four (4) year period. ►Sae Frhibit Ft•f for NO Agn Ovif,red Households J?afer to page C-5 of the detailed durnographics in Appendix C to this report. This factor represents the percent of age 65+ households who k e in owner occupied units in the PMA - based cit available census data. This factor was applied to age 7$+ households for this artarysrs - most 65+ Sen cvs do not self their home vitcept for the reasons of mortality and morbiddy. 9Et3+As'flAN, n IINVIAN RIVER COUNTY t -t? 40 C-1 • 0 011 ul 11 yon uu: uj 'Jd4a53kaas4 FAV I a --It 1, EXHIBIT 1-$1) EXPLANATIQN OF CALCUL.,ATlg—N/—QUAibLT FI AATiC�N OF POTS TIAL IMPACT OF NOME F.QUITY MDS has conducted an analysis giving consideration to the impact of horns equity Potential on Senior household incornes in the Primary Market Area (refer to Exhibit 1- 4a). I his analysis assumes that the minimum cash flour income threshold could be reduced (for those Seniors selling their homes) due to the additional annual cash flow that would result from the sale of a home and the reinvestment of the not after- tax sales Proceeds, 'flies analysis was acCOMpiished as follows: MDS assumed that the nut equity (after closing costs) earned from the sale of these Seniors' horries would be equal to 90% of the sales value and that this equity could be invested at 6% (average over a three to four year period), which would generate an additional cash flow of $5,130 per year. MDS then reduced the minimum income criteria of $40,000 by the amount of the additional cash flow that would be generated from the sale of the home and calculated the new percentage of age qualified households that would qualify at the new reduced income ievel (the percenqige of those who would qualify between $34,870 and $40,000). 3. MDS again reduced the new age and income qualified households to reflect only that percentage that area estimated to be homeowners (versus renters) in the Primary Market Area. Based on the 1990 census, approximately 86,8% of Seniors live in owner -occupied units. As can he aeon from Exhibit'1-torr, over 250 additional age 75+ households (whose income is below $40,000) would be qualifiers at this level, providing they could sell their home and Invest the net equity at 6%, thereby supplementing their existing annual cash flow income. Ii 01101/1995 08:09 R48930694 PUJkLlj ,c of percent of household incomes that Could be allocated to each type of living arrangement (as indicated earlier in this section). When factoring the existing competition in the detailed peactrution rate demand models, the impact of the competitive units are considered (subtracted out) at two different levels within our model - before and after the unique: income screening for the proposed community. This is based upon the estimated average required qualifying household income for the residents at each of the communities. Appendix D outlines v%,hick competitive communities are considered (subtracted) above and below the income screen in t11e penetration ratc/dcmand models. It should also be noted, again, that MDS gives consideration to all of the existing; occupied competitive units in the market area, as well as allowing for any vacant and plumed units to be filled to 95% occupancy before quantifying the feasibility of the proposed assisted living community. DeeisIQn 1 nfiuencer ililtlten Irrt r one of the most overlooked market segments with respect to state-of-the-art Senior housing, is the "decision influencer." This decision influencer is typically a child of the Senior who is responsible for providing care and decision snaking in latter years. Sometimes, it can be a t professional such as a member of the clergy or medical practitioner. One of the strongest marketing e impacts on retirement living are the children ages 45 to 64. They are highly motivated to solve an eventual and very personal family ltcalih and logistics problem involving; their p'trents in an effective r and compassionate martrtcr. In 1997, thele are an estimated 10,950 adult children (aged 45 to a4) living in the Primary Matket Area This represents approximately 27110 of the estimated total households in the Ibh1A 351 U.. c17♦z7d UV. YJ DRi �W These households are expected to increase by about 1,075 households over the next five years or approximately 215 new households ,per year tluough 2002. Potetil al f r dult Children Households to Subsidize a lement Sefor Partnts come -Of the estimated 10,950 adult children houscholds in )997, approximately 1,130 or 10% of these households tvere estimated to have annual household incomes in excess of $100,000. In the opinion of MDS, adult children households at these income Bevels could have the affordability and, perhaps, propensity to augment their Senior parents' income (for those Sensors whose incomes fall below the minimum criteria of 140,000) in order to access this state-of-the-art living arrangement. Ifonly i % of these households attracted and financially assisted a Senior parent (who would otherwise fall bcloev the qualifying income criteria) to live in this subject assisted living community, this could result in the potential absorption of approximately I 1 units. Please note that MDS has not relied on this in the evaluation of feasibility for the subject community, however, actions and decisions by these adult children can potentially result in the absorption of a significaut number of living units as A result of the declsion inflrsencers attracting tbelr geographically remote parents back to the Sebastian ninrket area. MDS has not gr:antitatively factored this potential 'impact into the market penetration rateldemand models, as it has already been assumed that 20% to 30% of the absoi-ption will come from outside the defined Primary Market Area. This impact is considered as forecaming safety margin for this development. Marketplace performance - both locally and nationally - has clearly demonstrated that the decision influencer plays an instrumental role in selecting Senior housing communities, in general, and assisted living and nursing care, in particular. It is the opinion of MDS that decision influencers will play a key role in the absorption of the ptrposed assisted living community and should be considered as a kcy taiget market to he aidicised by die sales and mArketing efforts and r -__X, Ity programming for the new community. It should be noted that this is an area in which, if the decision influencer market is appropriately and aggressively targeted, overall project risk can be signi ficantly reduced, Pr9iected Absuption Time Frame for the Parr* used nits It is the opinion of MDS that the proposed assisted living units will find good acceptance within a reasonable marketing and fill -rip period. Exhibit 1-5 presents the projected absorption time frames for 60 new assisted living units in the Primary Market Area. It is the opinion of M -DS that 60 assisted living units could conservatively be brought to 93% occupancy ArithiD a 12 -month tlrne frame after construction Is complete and a Certificate of Occupancy has been issued. "Phis absorption time frame is based on an average net monthly absorption of five units per month for assisted living and presumes a pre -opening "in -rush" absorption of 20%orthe units, or 12 units. This absorption rate is based on our national experience 'with state-of•the-art assisted living, the performance of new assisted living communities in the PMA a and SMA as well as other similar market areas and specific expectations for the subject development. ns act of Tu nr ovevRates - This absorption time frame takes into consideration the potential impact of turnover within this cominunity - or the refilling, of previously occupied units during the fill -up phase of the absorption. Because this will be a new project, MDS has implemented two, scenarios of absorption time frames. The second scenario gives consideration to a 25% turmovcr far ict for the ltcu' (Sebastian) As can he seen by Exhibit E1 5, this unpart extends the lets -up rates by Lpfirwtimately" two to three months. 40 i 0 0 �36407JUU.7u f".Js•.�� .... EXHIBIT 1.5 S%aTC l.�G_F�J-EGLD—AEISQRP_TiQN—TiME—FRAM—U tV'JftufAnauatrTstrttover: Total Assisted Living Units 14.7 60 12.0 • Units to be absorbed @ stab, occup.of 93,00% 56 • Pre opening "in -rush' absorption L 2000% 12 • Net remaining units to be absorbed 44 Units/ # of Abwmfion_Son_ab"Month Months Conservative 4 12.0 Expected 5 0.8 Most likely project absorption experience Achievable 6 8.3 WLTHANAV9CSUPNQf • Annual Turnover Ratio for Assisted Living during initial fill-up/absorption • Total Assisted Living Units • Units to be absorbed lW 93% Stabilized Occupancy 44 Units/ # of Month Months 25% 60 AU5-a tlo�lrl." Conservative Expected Most likely prof act absorption experience Achievable 4 14.7 5 12.0 6 101 The absorption rates reflect a+,+a%= over the enure (ill -up period -- front an early 'in -rush' of residents to the s/riwer fill -up as the ptuiuct approaches stabilized occupancy Source MIDS Analysts l Pfesumes n effective irid PMACrrve bilk?$ and mairkotswj pl.vri SEIRASTi,o N, f -L INOWN RIVER COUNTY J . _. t_ E d It is anticipated that, with aggressive and proactive pre -marketing efforts, the above stated absorption time frame could be reduced to a 10-mon(b fill -up. Absorption time for a project of this nature will vary as a function of marketing intensity, experience and image of the Development Team/sponsor, and specific marketplace conditions (size and depth of age/income qualified market, level of existing competition, case of selling home, etc). Realization of these absorption forecasts for the proposed development V_cc=ific_aIJy assume the following: 7 - 1. The appropriate layout of the project on the site. 2. A significant, dedicated marketing budget. I A state •of-tlie- art design implemented by qualified industry experts. 4. Sophisticated pre -market testing with Senior consumers and decision influencer involvement. S. An experienced marketing team with a specific understanding of the unique marketing positioning of this project in this particular market area. 6. An experienced and professional management operation. The preceding must be augmented by an aggressive pre -marketing effort and networking/outreach program supported by appropriate advertising and marketing aids. MDS stands ready to discuss irmovative marketing techniques that will help to insure that the early favorable market feasibility indications documented herein are translated into actual experience in the marketplace in the future. 40 40 0 i : IRC PLANN1140 DEP?; 5619781846; IRIDIAN RIVER COUNTY Apr -9-99 2:37Pld; INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM TO Peter Radke Planning FROM: Colleen Peterson 1 Personnel Administrator DATL April 6, 1999 oil, SUBJECT. Breakdown of Full-time Employees by Race Page 2;3 p.PRi9'� w0i"f11 %TY A In response to your recent request, the following is a breakdown of full -tune cmployees by race 1'r%he 665 Black 42 tUspanic 9 ,Asian l Total 717 Please let me know if you need any additional itlfomladon tit -rt by: IFti f..r.rr!.I h.r L- -', "Vi u,8I ti ri4; Art 03 yy �, ::iF9;, `age -3 [NDIAN RIVER COUNTY FFY 1998 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK ORANT (COBE) APPLICATION NOTICE OF SECOND PUBLIC HEARING The. Board of County Comm sswners of Indran River County is considering an application to the Florida 0epanmenl of Cnnmunity Affairs (DCA) for a grant under the Economic Dev"menl category in the urrxsunt of S750,000 under the Small Cities Community Development Block Grant (CDSG) Program. If awarded the grant funds, flee county Wit lend those funds to a private for profit business and that business will use the funds to build an assisted Irving faulty (ALF). which will create jobs rot k1w to moderate fnoorne persons (LMI). For each activity that is proposed, 70°% of the funds must benefit low is moderate income (LMl) persons. The actnrrties, dollar amount anc estimated percentage benerr, to low and moderate income persons for which the County+s alivi rig ate: ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CATEGORY (Low -Interest LOO to a Private For Profit Bus i ness ACIBUY" Budgrll (Approximately) Lhd % Building 5550,000 +51% Fixtures. furnishings and equipment S140,0DO +51% Admi stration &sO.OA(l. NIA TOTAL BUDGET $750.000.00 • The loan will fund a building and Other costs required for We development of an Assisted Living radl,fy (ALF) The project is located in the unincorporated area of Indian River County, north of CR 510, east of 661h Ave., and south of the City of Sebastian city limits The ALF will be located On a 22 acre site identified on the Indian River"Perly tax rolls by die foliamog tax lD numbers: 29-31-39-V0006- 3000-00043.0 and 29-31-39.01'WO-3000-000080. The County has adopted an ant. -displacement and relocation plan The County wit assist dhspiaced persons wrih grant funds. as Indicated In the budge and policy. A Public Bearing at which vixens shalt have an opportunity to be heard regarding lne Indian River County's Economo Deveopmenl GDBG application will be held by the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida in the County Cemml$$ion Chambers of the County Administralon Building, localed at 1840 25th Streel Vero Beach. Florida on April 20, 1692 in 9;05 a.m. A copy of the application wst be available for review at the above referenced meeting and at the Office of the Clerk to the Board of County Commissioners. 1840 25th Street. Vero Beach. Florida after April 13, between Ute hours of 8.30 a.m. and 5'00 p.m.. The application will be submitted to the Slate on or about April2l, 1999 To obtain additional information Concerning the application and rhe Public HraariN, or to schedule a time to to view the application. Contact Mr Peter Radke Of the Indian River Planning Department at (561) 567.800D, ox1. 243. The public hearing a being concluded in a handicapped accessible location. Any handicapped person requiring an inlerpreler for the hearing impaired or the visually impalred should coirlacl the County's Americans wrth lhsabilifies Act (ADA) Caordinalor at 587-8000, exlensro n 223 at least 48 hours in advance ofthe meeting The ADA office may also be contac led using a Telephonic Device for the Deaf ITDD) at 7705215 Any non-Engl sh speawrng "fson wislia ,g TO attend No pub4c hearerg should a'so corlaui the ADA office so that arrangernrnls for an me to role' can be rrace Pursuant Io Srcl on 142 of the HUD Reform Act of 15119. 1110ldloworxl disclosures wil 1 be submrttod to OCA wlth the a,tN canon Tne disckasures wilt De rrrade availatrki by the t"gunty and OCA foo puts -w ,nspeclien f ran •ecueot Th"m dnrciosures will ore rrvaiiabio for 1 mynmum r>+rnrxl of lura liras 1 Olhat 0ZV#rnrerr1 rtQtiera stale acid toe�ll #af+starics ra tow prvtocl ire trw loin+ cif' a gm, gram roanilii wonlee rna.urar,ra OSyrr>irnl rotate %UV&dy, cFVdA two Wiel l E. any Glair Torn+ W acne no mdowd br rold toy +motor rw arnnmrl. i Tlrt lrfisw�ia and RKrpr+iltr ++an►rir cif ant de.aa+iwret aaYdMattc � . r c.svaurr owdiiiri0 vie* a0ouhacr• rnr sir r fly Per", as do.*rq-W. -.1 Via nrr -at • adlsiiillir. r'A 0 W97e900; e,6* a acv Ir:3irl Page 313 3. The ldenlilles and pecuniary interests of any other persons with a pecuniary interest in the ptolect that can reasonably be expectad to exceed $50,000 or 10% of the grant request (whichever k tower); 4 For those developers, contraclors, consultants, or'operty owners. or others listed In IWO (2)or three (3) above which are corporations, or aider entities. the identificat on and pecuniary Interests by corpeiratiort or entity of each officer, droM, principal slockhatders, or other official of the onttty; 5. The expected Sources of all funds to be provided to the protect by each of the pmv ders of those funds and the amount provided; and 6. The expected uses of all funds by activity And amount A MR HOIISINGIBQUAL QPPORTUNITYIHAN[NCAP ACCESS JURISDICTION indim River County Board of Count} Commissioners Hy: •s- Kenncth R. !tlachl. Chairman To be adrertiscd April 12. 1999. SesL-gin "A" p[ erred. Do cot place in the portion of the newspaper %Nherc legal notices and class:ited advenissments appear. Minimum width: 2 coiutr,ro Minimum length. 16 inches Mimrnum headline type site: 18 poIm plssse forward proofofpublication hefom public hearing date to vam�ssa Carter Pier^.ing Department I S3:, 25th Street Vera Beach, FL 32960 • .,aril --try; IK YLANN1NU ULFI; ;o1vrblduo; APF -s-yy c. srr+N; rdgr .7rd [NOT -AN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA '-dENiORAND UM TO: Community Development Block Grant Citizen Advisory Task Force Members: Commissioner Ruth Stanbridge, Chairman Hobert M. Keating, AiCP Larola Casrtible Billy Minnis Joe idlette William Mosley Ralph Lundy Victor Mart, Sr. Bernice Johnston Arthur Harris Joe Wiggins FROM: Peter Radke Economic Development Planner DATE: April 09, 19454:,k RE: Citizen Advisory Task Force Meeting A Citizen Advisory Task Force Meeting will be held to discuss the Community Development Block Grant (C:DBG) program. The County is considering applying for a giant in the Economic Development Category that will hand a low interest loan to an Assisted Living Facility (ALF). The meeting will be held on Monday, April 19, 1999 at 3:00p.m. in the County Commission Charrtbers of the County Administration Building, located at 1840 ?5th Street Vero Beach, Florida. If you have any questions, please call me at 567.8000, ext. 24:3. %'c look forward to seeing you thea W:luW,cdbglseb`.catf mem do r,_ RIM ;Ua Y9ts1U11 11 .b b.API AL WI1 81% )LAIN Ito W N'b 1121 r UVr capital City Bank April 2, 1999 William H, "feud" Clsrk Mborah Roumelis 1933 Cummonsa•eaRb Lane TaAxhassee, FL, 32303 Dela Bud and Debbie, We appreciatC4 Ifte oPAorrtnity to look al your AIS project with you. Charles and I both enjoyed working tints you and, as ue disccssed, feel [hat rJtere is a steed for this type offacility arsri thr�s it Would be a camrnunity enact. We, sincerely hope that you hre able to arrange ulremativo financing and sslggest that your pursue tr)7 cs brat may have lower loan to value or equity requvetntnfinnncing rhe regtured equity injection appears to be a hts than traditional lenders. As um discussed,. urdlc liras we would not be Able to work hound. Please feel fMc to call me if ynti have any questions and we look fornxtd to consimtirg our exl banking relatiorsship with both of you. stittg `ii»cerely, LVslli tm P.. -Slap- 5ntith 1r. CRA CARE CENTERS, INC. FINANCIAL FORECAST FOR THE YEARS ENDING MARCH 31, 2001 .2006 Ufthall a cc p" CmUded Pub4t. Accourftr" CONTENTS Page No. ACCOUNTANTS' REPORT i FINANCIAL- FORECAST Forecasted Balance Sheets Under the Hypotheticai Assumptions in Note 1, 2 Forecasted Statements of Revenue, Expenses and Changes in Retained Earnings under the Hypothetical Assumptions in Note 1. 3 Forecasted Statements of Cash Flows under the Hypothetical Assumptions in Note 1, 4 Summary of Significant Forecast Assumptions and Accounting Policies, 5-9 Supplemental Revenue and Expense Forecast 10-16 Mitchell & Company C erfiried hibiir Accounfano :Member American institute or Certified Public Accountants Florida Institute: or Certified Public Accountants Joseph D. Mitchell. CPA C. Guy Farmer, CPA Board of Directors GRA Care Centers, Inc. Tallahassee, Florida Telephone SW386.2522 Fax 85o 3w.6933 We have compiled the accompanying forecasted balance sheets, as of March 31, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, and 2005 and the forecasted statements of revenue, expenses and changes in retained earnings. and cash flows of CRA Care Centers, Inc., for the years then ending in accordance with statements on Standards for Accounting and Review services issued by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. The accompanying forecast and this report were prepared to assist the Board of Directors in obtaining CDBG financing. They should not be used for any other purpose. A compilation is limited to presenting, in the form of a forecast, information that is the representation of management and does not include evaluation of the support for the assumptions underlying the forecast. We have not examined the forecast and, accordingly, do not express an opinion or any other form of assurance on the accompanying statements orassumptions. Furthermore, even if the occupancy levels are attained, and bank financing obtained, there will usually be differences between the forecasted and actual results, because events and circumstances frequently do not occur as expected, and those differences may be material We have no responsibility to update this report for events and circumstances occurring after the date of this report. A4ii 12, 1"9 iw i PANUaw ti G"Oft 1171rV4. !�uilr i1 • Tr1Lb..." kwV& stw CRA CARE CENTERS, INC. DISIA THREE PALMS ASSISTED LIVING FACILITY FORECASTED BALANCE SHEETS UNDER THE HYPOTHETICAL ASUMPTIONS IN NOTE 1 March 31, 2001, 2002,2003,2004 AND 2005 ASSETS 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 CURRENT ASSETS Cash $51,763 $311,867 $543.082 $804,555 51,101,459 Accounts receivable 7.415 21,092 22,988 23,872 24,750 Inventories 6,559 15,378 16.518 17,098 17,678 Prepaids 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL CURRENT ASSETS 65.737 348,337 582,588 845,525 1,143,897 PRCPE:RTY AND EQUIPMENT Land 340,000 340,000 340.000 340,000 340,0400 Land Improvements 327,000 327,000 327,000 327,000 327,000 Building and Improvements 3.548,800 3,548.800 3.548,800 3,548,800 3,548,800 Equipment and furniture 156,000 165,000 _166,000 ,166,000 166,000 4,381,800 4,381,800 4,381,800 4,381,800 4,381,800 Less Accumulated Depreciation (128,784) (257,569) [386f3S3) (515,137 (643,9213 TOTAL PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT 4,253,016 4,124.231 3.995,447 3,866.663 3,737,879 OTHER ASSETS Depreciabon Reserve 0 90.671 246„107 401,543 556.979 Start up costs (Nat) 84,000 63,000 42,000 21,000 0 Development costs (Net) 0 0 0 0 0 Finance costs (Net) 276,008 268.931 261,854 254,777 247.699 TOTAL OTHER ASSETS 360,008 422.602 549,961 677,320 844,678 4,878,761 4,895,170 5,127,995 5.389,507 5.686,454 CRA CARE CENTERS, INC. DISIA THREE PALMS ASSISTED LIVING FACILITY FORECASTED STATEMENTS OF REVENUE, EXPENSES AND CHANGES IN RETAINED EARNINGS UNDER THE HYPOTHETICAL ASSUMPTIONS IN NOTE 1, For the Years Ending March 31, 2001,'2002, 2003, 2004 and 2005 `tee vw""Wl .v s4 "^-1 t 0-:-Dr-au- i:ka �vr+� " 2001 -- 2302 2003 - 2004 ^- -2005 NET RESIDENT SERVICE REVENUES ECC Standard Bad Revenues ECC Deluxe Bed Revenues 260,400 611,497 649.531 672,331 695,132 ECC Semi -private Bed Revenues 96,900 45,900 285,386 295,768 306,151 316,533 Dementia Bed Revenues 308.750 63.419 1,010,353 69.761 1.130,879 72,210 1,170,577 74,659 1,210.274 Levet 11 Additional Revenues Level III Additional Revenues 10,800 36,994 38,663 40,020 41,377 Laundry Revenues 9,600 72,745 77,325 80,039 82,754 Meal Revenues 4,410 4,705 16,664 9.861 18,171 18.809 19,447 Interest Income 0 10,220 10.579 10.937 _ 2,267 _8.476 16,516 24,913 5741„465 $2,109,188 52,298.794 32,387,232 52.476,026 EXPENSES Plant Operation HousekeepingAdministration 89.733 128,033 135,245 140,022 144,829 22,284 231,455 38,343 249,207 39,685 255„228 41,325 42,805 Dietary Activity Program 122,351 295,283 314,771 261,371 326,030 267,649 337,506 Property Taxes & insurance 331,131 99.600 651,312 681,378 706,104 731,665 Depreciation and amortization 135.861 103,212 135,861 106.967 135,861 110,722 135,661 114,477 Interest expense 360,204 3577.431 354.492 _ 3511,377 135.861 348,074 1,392,620 1,958.682 2,023,828 2,072,811 2,122,868 EXCESS OF REVENUES OVER EXPENSES (651.155) 150,505 274,968 314.421 353,159 -- 0 0 _ 0 NET INCOME (651,155) 150,505 274.966 314,421 353.159 RETAINED EARNINGS - beginning of year 0 (651.155) (500.649) (225.683) 88.737 RETAINEO EARNINGS . end o1 year (5651.155) (5500,649) (S225,683) $88,737 $441,896 `tee vw""Wl .v s4 "^-1 t 0-:-Dr-au- i:ka �vr+� " CRA CARE CENTERS, INC. DISIA THREE PALMS ASSISTED LIVING FACILITY FORECASTED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS UNDER THE HYPOTHETICAL ASUMPTIONS IN NOTE 1 Years Ending March 31, 2001, 2082. 2003, 2004 And 2005 CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATIONS Net Income Adjustments to reconcile excess revenues over expenses to not cash provided by operations: Depreciation and amortization (increase) in accounts rec. (Increase) in inventory Increase in accounts payable Increase in accrued expenses TOTALADJUSTMENTS Net cash provided by operations CASH FLOW FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES Capital contribution " CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES 2001 2002 2003 2004 2G05 (54,3001 Net cash used in financing ($651,155) $150,505 5274,986 $314,421 $353,159 156,861 155,861 156.861 156,861 156.86., (7.415) (13,677) (1.898) (884) (8881 (6.559) (8.819) (1,140) (580) (580) 9,704 13.047 1,687 858 858 84,096 107,799 14,054 7,229 7,229 236,687 255.212 169.5156 103.484 133,48' (414,468) 405.717 4A4,532 477,905 515,1541 0 (90.571) (155,436) (155,436) (155.436) Principal paid on long tent debt: (52.169) _(54,942) (57.8811)(60.996) (54,3001 Net cash used in financing activities (522169) (54,942) _ _(37.881) (60.996) (64.300) NET INCREASE IN CASH (466.637) 260.104 231.215 261,473 296.90: CASH AT BEGINNING OF YEAR 51.763 _ 311,667 543,082 &04.555 CASH AT END OF YEAR _518,400 $51,763 $31 t--- 887 `� $543.082 5804.555 $1.101,459 Sir W. "nwy co agndicbm bhi SM Mw/9111 G &V --Xx*Pq rcA—w w m~40W el0M 4 CRA CARE CENTERS. INC. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT FORECAST ASSUMPTIONS AND ACCOUNTING POLICIES FOR THE YEARS ENDING MARCH 31, 2001 2005 NOTE 1 - NATURE AND LIMITATIONS OF FORECAST The accompanying forecast assumes CRA, Care Centers, Inc. (the Facility) occupancy levels are attained, and CDSG financing is obtained. This financial forecast presents, to the best of managements knowledge and belief, the Facility's expected financial, position, results of operations, and cash flows For the years ending March 31, 2001 - 2005 if it attains occupancy levels, and financing is obtained. Accordingly, the forecast reflects its judgement as of April 12. 1999, the date of this Forecast, of the expected conditions, and its expected course of action given those two hypothetical assumptions. This presentation is designed to assist the Board of Directors and CDSG in negotiating financing arrangements and should not be considered to be a presentation of expected future results. Accordingly, this forecast may not be useful for other purposes. The assumptions disclosed herein are those that management believes are significant to the forecast. Even if occupancy levels are attained, and financing obtained, there will usually be differences between forecasted and actual results, because events and circumstances frequently do not occur as expected, and those differences may be malenal. NOTE 2 - NATURE OF OPERATIONS The Facility is a Corporation Formed for the purpose of providing assisted living services to the elderly. The Facility will operate a 70 bed assisted living facility. NOTE 3 - CAPITALIZATION The purchase of the facility, capital, improvements, and financing will be funded through a private lender with a 3090,000 CDSG loan from the local government. NOTE4-ASSETS Cash Cash will be provided from operations of the Facility. Accounts Receivable Accounts Receivable are based on the estimated collection period for private revenues Lnventories Inventories are based on the inventory balances for the existing facility. Inventories include raw rood„ dietary supplies and housekeeping supplies r CRA CARE CENTERS. INC SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT FORECAST ASSUMPTIONS AND ACCOUNTING POLICIES FOR THE YEARS ENDING MARCH 31, 2001 - 2005 NOTE 4 - CONTINUED Pro er and E ui menF Capital assets have been recorded at forecasted costs. Depreciation has been recorded as follows: Method of Annual Amount Depreciation Life Depreciation Land $ 340.000 Land Improvements 327,000 Straight Lane 20 $ 16,350 Building 3,648,800 Straight Line 40 88,720 Equipment 166,000, Straight Line 7 23.714 $4,381 800 $128,784 Qeferred Costs Financing costs have been based on the cost of borrowing funds .-seeded for acquisition of the fa--lity. .Amortization has been recorded as follows: Amortization Annual Amount Period Deoreciation Start-up $ 105.004 5 $ 21,000 Financing 283,085 40 7.077 $ 388,085 $_28.077 NOTE 5 - LIABILITIES Accounts and Notes Payable Accounts payable consists of trade payables and other payables (i.e. payroll taxes). The amounts reflect an average of 30 days for all food and supply expenses and two weeks for payroll expenses. r • CRA CARE CENTERS, INC. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT FORECAST ASSUMPTIONS AND ACCOUNTING POLICIES FOR THE YEARS ENDING MARCH 31, 2001 -2005 NOTE 5 - CONTINUED Long -Term Debt Long-term debt is forecasted by the following: 2001 2002 2003 2004 2405 T8%.53,712,004 $4,263.705 54,246,244 $4,227,370 54.2+36,472 $4.184.923 note payable hank for building costs due in monthly Installments of 329.118 including interest, maturing in March 2040, collateralized by mortgage on land and buiiding. 4%.$554.000 531,672 512.597 492.745 472.084 450.581 note payable bank for acquisition of land and improvements due in monthly Installments of $3.333 including interest maturing in March 2024, 4%,5140,000 122,315 103.908 84,753 64.816 44.067 note payable bank for acquisition of furnishings and equipment due in monthly installments Of 51.914 including Interest maturing In March 20017 Less current portion 9 943 5.7.881 0-029-7 14 3O c$ Total ong•!r•rrn dent S4 744 S44. S4_LjLq71, 54 70 57 $4 t 1 +W • 0 CRA CARE CENTER'S. INC. SUMMARY CF SIGNIFICANT FORECAST ASSUMPTIONS AND ACCOUNTING POLICIES FOR THE YEARS ENDING MARCH 31, 2001 2005 Maturities of long-term debt for the years subsequent 'o December 31, 2003 are forecasted as follows Year Amount 2006 S 68,026 2007 71,988 2008 52,559 Thereafter 4,418 973 Total S 4611,546 Interest expense is forecasted at 5360.204, $357,431, 5354,492. $351,377, and $3118,074 for the years anding March 31, 2001, March 31, 2002, March 31, 2003, March 31, 2004, and March 31. 2005, respectively. NOTE 6 - CENSUS AND PATIENT MIX The forecasted patient mix is: NOTE 7 - REVENUE Revenues have been forecasted based on the expected occupancy levels, patient mix, and per diem rates 2001 2002 200 2004 2005 ECC/Standard 44% 39% 3$°Io% 38% 38% ECC/Deluxe 13% 15% 14% 14% 14% ECC"Semi-Private 10% 5% 5% 5% 5% Dementia 33% 41% 43% 443% 43% Totals 100% 1001% 100%n 100% 100% Total Percent Occupancy 34% 86% 90% 90% 90% NOTE 7 - REVENUE Revenues have been forecasted based on the expected occupancy levels, patient mix, and per diem rates to be in effect in 2000 - 2004. Revenues arra reported on the accrual basis in the period In which services are provided, regardless of •,s,hether collection in full is expected, The following is a detailed schedule of the monthly rates used to project revenues by payor type: 2001 2?� 2003 2004 aUO ECCIStandard 2,100 2,176 2.255 2.334 2,414 ECCIDeluxe 2.550 2,642 2,739 2,835 2.931 ECCI eml•Private 1,700 1,762 1,938 2,006 2,074 Dementia 3,250 3.368 3,490 3.613 3,735 Level El 300 311 322 333 345 Level 111 600 622 644 667 690 CRA CARE CENTERS. INC. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT FORECAST ASSUMPTIONS AND ACCOUNTING POLICIES FOR THE YEARS ENDING MARCH 31, 2001-2005 NOTE 8.OPERATING EXPENSES Expenses are based on comparable facilities and are inflated using the McGraw-Hill DRI indices for the Health Care Industry. NOTE 9 - INCOME TAXES The Facility is organized as a corporation organized under Sub -chapter "S" of the Internal Revenue Code. Therefore, all income taxes will be paid by the stockholders. NOTE 10 - SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS As indicated in Note 7 above, the projected revenues and expenses are based on occupancies reflected on Note 6. The following occupancy percentages are expected for the facility revenues and expenses to breakeven, NOI Breakeven 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 Percent Occupancy 91.52% 76.71% 73.76% 72.46% 71.29% Cash Flaw Breakeven 2001 2002 2003 2'004 2005 Percent Occupancy 82.23% 70,13% 67.74% 66.82% 66.02% ff the CDBG loans are financed at 8%, net income will be as follows: 2001 20027003 2004 2005 Net Income (Loss) (678,428) 124.020 249.396 289.907 329.855 4 40 f Mitchell & Company Certified Ablie .=Accountants Member American Institute of Certified Public Accountants Florida Institute of Certified Public Accountants Joseph D. N itchell. CPA r C. Grey Farmer, CPA ACCOUNTANTS'REPORT ON SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION Board of Directors CRA Gare Centers, Inc. Tallahassee, Florida Telephone 855386.2522 Fax 8501386•6953 The schedule of forecasted operating expenses for theyears ended March 31, 2001.2002.2003, 2004, and 2005 is presented for purposes of additional analysis and is not a required part of the basic forecasted financial statements. Such information has been subjected to the procedures applied in the forecast of the basic forecasted financial statements and, in our opinion, is fairly stated in all material respects in relation to the bask forecasted financial statements taken as a whole. April 12, 1999 CRA CARE CENTERS, INC. PROJECT SUMMARY OVERVIEW PROJECT SIZ Total Development Cost Number of Reos 70 Number of Units fib Avefage Unit Size (5 f) 469 Commas, Area Square Feet $0.625 Resictem Unit Square peel 31.875 Total Souare Feat 42 5+70 PROJECT COST: Total Development Cost $4,169,885 TDlai 6051 per 3eC $68.141 Total Cost par Square Fool S112 Hard Construction Cast Der Souara Fool 572 FLOW SUIjMARY: Gross. Annual tncomtr Annual Operating Expanses NET OPERATING INCOME ANNUAL DE UT SERVICE ANNUAL NET CASH FLOW RETURN ON INVESTMENT FLOW BREAKEVEN ANALYSIS.- 9reakeven - NOt - ill of bear occup,e6 9rea"ven • NOI - %Octupan4y 9rpakeven • Cash Flow - 9 of be -is octup*a 3feakoven - Cakh Flaw - 9C rrr�rva nr., PROJECT FINANCING: Totnt Cash Equity 658% 5350.025 Deet Financing 93,121.1. 54,q%%0 Annual Debt 5ervica 5412.171 Interest Rale 7 81794 Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 141,165 2,109,158 2.298.794 2.387.232 2.476.026 875,$54 1,444,390 1,512,475 1.564,573 1,617.933 (134,089) 664.798 786,319 327,559 359,094. 412,373 412,373 412,373 412,373 412,373 1546,462) 252:124 373,346 410.296 445,721 403% -364 a% 8419% 202 0 112 9"x4 -033 1 61 1 91 199 208 54 54 52 51 50 91 52% 76 71% 73 76'% 72'is% 7t 29% 58 49 41 57 ab 12 23% 1,013% 87 ia`4 66 E12K %56 0:1 *)I CRA CARE; CENTERS, INC. CAPITAL BUDGET SOURCES: Total Cash Equity 6.58% 3350.025 Debt Financin2 93.42% $4.969.864 Item Cost Total Cost S Bed $IS.F. Land Casts: Land acquisition 340,004 $4857 $8.00 Construction Costs: 3,050.500 S43.579 $71.78 Site Work 327.000 ImpaN Fees 35.000 Subtotal 3,412,SC0 $48.750 580.29 Development Costs: ArchilecturallEngineering Fees 234,000 Permit Fees 19,000 Equipment 166.000 Ma(keling/Start-up Casts 74.000 Initial Training & Hire 15,004 Management Consultation 20,400 Subtotal 524.000 $7.466 51233 Total Acquisition, Construction & Development Costs 4,276,500 $61,493 $100.62 Construction Financing Casts - Capitalized Interest 210.300 Total Interim Casts 4,486,800 S64.097 5105.57 Permanent Financing Cods 4183.085 TOTAL WORKING CAPITAL REQUIRED 4 769885 S68,141 $112.23 heserves wodr inq Cap'Lli Reserve 550.000 T07At CAPITA?_ I'XPFNSrSAND RIF FiiE'RVES 3.)t49A? $75 "a 1112! It CRA CARE CENTERS, INC. REVENUE AND EXPENSE SUMMARY PRODUCT MIX AND REVENUE ASSUMPTIONS: AVERAGE [OCCUPIED UNITS; ECC,STANDARD BEDS ECCi0ELUXE BEDS ECC/SEMI-PRIVATE BEDS DEMENTIA BEDS TOTAL BEDS LEVEL II CAFE LEVEL III CARE UNIT OCCUPANCY MONTHLY RESIDENT REVENUES, ECCISTANDARD BEDS ECC/DELUXE BEDS ECCESEMI•PRIVATE BEDS DEMENTIA BEDS LEVEL II CARE LEVEL ill CARE T61al 4 of Unils Ycar 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 ye, ar5 I INCOME & EXPENSE PER RESIDENT DAY: TOTAL INCOME PER RESIDENT DAY OPERATING EXPENSES PER RESIDENT DAY: TOTAL STAFFING COST OTHER OPERATING EXPENSES MANAGEMENTFEES TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSE PER RESIDEN I DAY OPERATING EXPENSE RATVO T OPERATING 25 10 23 24 2e 24 t1 3 9 9 9 9 4 2 3 3 3 3 30 8 25 27 27 27 70 24 60 63 63 63 3 10 10 10 14 1 10 10 10 10 33.81% 86.31% 50.00% 90.00% 90.04% $2.100 52.178 52,255 52.333 S2,414 52,550 S2,642 52,739 52,835 52.931 S1,700 SI,762 51,938 $2.006 52;074 $3.250 $3.368 53,A94 $3,513 $3.735 5340 5311 5322 $333 5345 5600 S622 $844 5667 5690 Year I Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 $86.05 595.64 $99.97 $103.82 5747.68 54.50 4026 40.43 4191 43.43 40.90 22.38 22,60 2339 24.19 5.21 286 2.74 2.74 2. Te S 101.61 S6550 $85.77 S6804 S7036 118.11E 685% 658% 655% 653% IS r 5 561 $3015 Sas 20 $3578 $3732 71 40 • CRA CARE CENTERS, INC. REVENUE 1,01413UTAT10N YEAR CG'STO ECCXLX ECCSP DEMEWIA LEVEL It LEVEL III LAUNZRY IAEAL5 iNTEREST TOTAL %ICNTHLY RATE $2.100 52.550 51.700 53."53 5300 S6t0 S20 AVERAGE RESIDENTS 1033 3.17 225 792 300 733 1225 MONTHLY REVENUE 521,700 58,075 83,825 525.729 $3170 5800 5358 4N NUAL REVENUE , $280400 $96.900 545:300 5308.750 510:800 59.600 - 54,410_., S4_70S 0 5741485 YEAR ECG'STD ECC13L2t ECCdSP DEMENTIA LEVELS! LEVEL III LAUNDRY DEALS INTEREST TOTAL MONTHLY RATE 52.176 $2.642 51.762 53,368 $311 5622 531 AVERAGE RESIDENTS 23.42 9OD 300 2500 992 9.75 44.67 AiONT]^g_Y REVENUE $50.956 523,702 $5,265 584,196 $3.083 56,062 $1.369 ANNUAL REVENUE $611,447 5285.306 583419 $1010.353 536.994 $72,736 S10.864- $9,884 $2,267 $2,109,188_ YEAR1.- ECC:STD ECC 04LX ECC'SP DEMENTIA LEVEL 11 LEVEL Ili LAUNCRY MEALS INTEREST TOTAL .MONTHLY RATE 52,25: $2.739 51.938 53.4410 5322 $644 S32 AVERAGE RESIDENTS 24 w 9.00 3.00 2700 t0 00 10 00 47 MONTHLY REVENUE $54,128 $24,647 SSA13 $94.240 53,222 $6,444 51.514 ANNUAL REVENUE ��$040.53.1 5555.137 5295.768 $69^701 51,130.879 $38T6W 577,315 _510,171 _- _ _ $10.220 _ 58,478 52.296.794 YEAR 4: ECG'S',D ECCIDLX ECGSP DEMENTIA LEVEL II LEVEL III LAUNDRY MCNTHLY RATE 52.334 $2.035 52,006 57.643 533.3 $667 S33 AVERAGE RESIDENTS 24.00 9.00 300 2700 1000 1000 s7 MONTHLY REV€NUE 556,028 $25.513 $4.017 597,588 53,}35 56.870 $1,587 31111UALRZ+IENUE-S67233i-$306,151572,21D 5555.137 $315 533 $741559 St_1t0.577 540.020 580039 516.809 MEALS INTEREST '-OTAL 510,579 516.576 $2.367.232 MEALS INTEREST TOTAL $0237 52491.3 52.4"64;5 ECCrSTD ECC.DLX ECGSP DEMENTIA LEVEL It LEVEL III LAUNDRY MONTHLY RATE 82.414 57.931 52.Or4 $3435 $345 5650 $34 AVERAGE RESIDENTS 2490 900 300 2700 1000 4000 47 UONTHL'tR@VENUE $57921 $26377 562.2 51008% 53.446 16a 8 51621 A14NUAL REVENUE 5555.137 $315 533 $741559 5s 2147274 5.11 371 582.754 $49 447 MEALS INTEREST '-OTAL 510,579 516.576 $2.367.232 MEALS INTEREST TOTAL $0237 52491.3 52.4"64;5 a i rf� • 1m CRA CARE CENTEnS, wC. ESTIMATED EXPENSES MAI TOTAL 1 ,,1n 2 TCTu. r- R 3 Y AR 4 Y_AA S - TOTAL TOTAL -a7 ILANT 0PERA710NS: SALARIES BENEFITS 1]3x-1 tx&16 1$,250 t8.9f4 1.9.663 SUPPLIESIREPAIRSMAINT 3.584 6,104 S,;DZ t S 7. G3 -1.873 S.O54 5.23a UTILITIES 64,821 38 312 15.331 92.790 MOW 20.$8,1 39.P33 128.373 135,245 M,04799.305 11D,O22 144 S3 IOUSEI(EEPING: SALARIES67.307 BENE=ITS 27,56;5 24.360 25.246 26,165 SUPPLIES 3.553 3.121 6.276 8. 8.'41 3.9 85 3. via 9,02t 4.136 3.6$6 x2.264 ]6.313 39.88s, 41,325. MINISTRATION: SALARIES aENEFITS i0454 73.146 91,315 3114 37,372 :ES 15.alo72$ 3.725 26.357 21.799 22,504 27.323 INSURANCE INSURANCE 9.384 5,339 3.399 5,595 5.592 5,888 PROFESSIONAL SVCS 7,x00 7.781 10.452 IO,a05 15.753 START-UP 2 7,713 9.�q.t 9.275 MATlA�,Er»1ENTFEES ENT FE 53.500 63,000 21,000 21 AGO 21.000 OTHER 47,4t0 43.2+72 63,000 44-784 j 63,000 63.DDO 23$A55244.207 zss-zz6� 48.3.;6 261-371 41,928 167-539 ETARY; SALARIES 9ENEMS 52-924 122,30 724,515 (34..230 339,113 POOP 14.130 ,41 32.697 34.582 35.839 37.143 G-ETICIAN Sap ' 39 543 150.+]92 165.361 160,629 122.351 SFoD ;45 263 314.771 SJO 326 621-630 337 �6 171EN1 CAREIACTIVITIES: SALARIES BENEFITS 233.963 476.435 498.628 956.188 �. TRANSPORTATION $2466 25,700 27.208 177.(3/ 137,47' 142;997 ACTIVITIES SUPPLIES 34,197 13,471 35.:+1 34,665 37,929 •P'� 311-131 45131, 14,17$ $$1.378• 14.674 x615,103 15.172 P3t.66C IOPERTY� TAXES 1N 5vrRANCE a4 3W "•5.604 s?.%6 40.211 13,3$4 96,54,1 AMORTIZATION 1,077 1$.1$6 >.077 16.754 17.342 17-935 INTEREST 244 3,7.431 7.077 35+!42 x477 351.3-7 7-0""PRECIATICII 34$014 2$.Tba 12'1.7$4 1211.7$4 t28. 7+44 1°.'$.7'34 5'o R15 :-:6.30+. 591 32tl 54?.960 396 LA0 , 8i 0d162p 2977 M111 2�TT 611 ftra us �.. r. ...,. 17 7!:Q 14!,4 St42 1960 i:/ 40 0 O7 VIA CAR& CENTEIIS, INC L STAFFINdiSALAdNES HOURLY INFIATEO INFLATED BENEFITS BENEFITS 1+Ofp5EiEEPtNG WAGE .;, 1000000 7.27 PTE'S SALARIES ;4 %-. GROU4p5 iiAINT d'' 6394 ±l 5 'I:07 ,3+25 3553 LEAOC77A965 CNA'$ 23.595 6 i 'S 26.127 3564 7.660 4N 71-4 174 6 2 39 974 2£1.653 L?N 182, 11127 7 3 •1 s90 3.:44 CHEF ,44_ 1316 ^142 13..x.6 23 la 67185 23,07 10.Cr9 COOK ASST =K 7517 6.7 37 ItM6 6.294 3.:111 ACil1NiSTRATOR 7jJ 27 15 7;,7 2135 12 10 16. 7 13.;92 I.E35 11,116 PEeEPT-OVIST AC'<r;TLVINANC1.L ASST 341 SIT 13 "0 i:'3 1 •[a 54h:uL 71#1€CSOR !344 •341 39 II.:dS 25.576 545; 7.G12�2. TOTAL SALARIES 44 10 MM 45.567 20.221 T2,I7; L SA1-0bE3lFTE'S _ TOTAL RESICEHT$ 371 75 236 2.420 00 INFLATEO INFLATED BENEFITS iEKEEPING BENEFITS FTFS SALARIES HOUSEKEEPING 1.036264 FTE -3 SALARIES 17.75'9 6394 ' GROUNDS MA1NT 1 $3 147 is 23.595 HAAS RN 929 3.0 LEAD CkA 698 10 30 17 610 45.437 11,93+ .. .. 57,37[ CPLCS 8.07 11.11 4 ;11.367 4A Jt; COOK 1$ 49 LPN 15.93 ?3 7I,$t{ 3,71 . 10 CST CHEF 1194 44 131.273 36.5562 - 1LST77AFOR COOK T395 T3 .0.012 7,7 so - ; 9 75 ASST COOK 9.7 1p '7.519 1,702 9193 24 196 2.'_Ld 6 697 AOMINISTRAT3R 1 63 2T 92 44 10 MM 45.567 20.221 T2,I7; L SA1-0bE3lFTE'S _ RECEPTIONIST 371 75 9,064 2.420 00 A0?A°M1F'NANCLIL ASST r 1 46 10 27.839 5.365 SOCIAL Dart TOR 1115 To ;0.•117_ 13.722 TOTAL SAAR.ES -'-'._m9 _ -rid-so 191.dii TOTAL RE SIOENTS 1 INFLATEO BENEFITS iEKEEPING 1036360 FTFS SALARIES 2175111 1740" MAINT 765 is 24,3610 6394 ' 8.77 1.0 18.250 5.00 16,941 HAAS RN 929 3.0 57,wa $5.477 T $17 145 252.3X3 57,37[ CHEF 1962 03 12.244 3.253 COOK 1$ 49 4 5 `4E.`s54 3a.70? C4096 1446 10 10 CST 6422 COOK6.77 :9 2311 1 0 ,$.:59 72 449 Tp 911 1LST77AFOR S1 22' 71 50 21.±C0 2,,660 P£1ONIST 9t7 ; 9 75 +„' 249 41FWAKLAL ;SST 11 M 1 7 9193 24 196 2.'_Ld 6 697 LL [NRECTOR r4 57 1 5 31 140 6.314 6.314M.". L SA1-0bE3lFTE'S _ --3S.,3 _ T52.id' _ L RFS71>E7ri5 00 INFLATER BENEFITS HO41SMEPWG 1035103 FTV$ SALARIES 2715% GROUN- WAT IIN 909 15 10 25.248 5.71^. 1FAD CMA 9.63 30 18414 60.0x7 5.00 16,941 HAAS RN 11 67 IIS 261,502 6952, LPN 2934 0.3 12 E69 3 238 CHEF 16^5 is $ W 222 10 11: COOK 11 10 P 16p 132: C4096 909 17 1s 914 53511 ADUL41STRATOR :9 2311 so s9 64 '• 5+ ;5A «7'34 72 449 Tp 911 AECEPTOOMST 9311 0 5 5 7 2 599 INAMCIAL ASST "1 A ±S:i_ .410.4. 'ESti7f5 oF'p-f 552 10 322'3 9517 NNW/ M1 153iUXNT5R MT 36 IH7LA7EU 6L'wEFITS •'%!39'3 rTEy 3.41.4.4x5,9 X3 r5% WAftWAN! 112 ,7 7105 6]11 304 i2 6;343 +7Q« / 17 •4 4 1!1 316 r2 16' 3701 77 .71ST 16,a 11103 11 1k7 7/2 1, V." •093 r 7 N 27d 7181 1 'gals 12Y Igloo Rio •73 71 4•; 4 MAC -kb 4w ♦ ll A JR 9/• Cc7a' .+1a�•n• w1/' / a3 C«tun NNW/ M1 40 C7 d i teleptwnx 15611 567-OCOO April 13, 1999 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS 1840 25th Street, Fero Beach, Florida 32960 Mr. Rick Stauts, Planning Manager Bureau of Community Development Florida Department of Community Affairs 2555 Shumard Oak Boulevard Tallahassee, Florida 32.399-2100 Re: Indian River County's Proposed CDBG-ED Application Certification of Available Water and Wastewater Capacity The proposed project will receive water service from the north county regional water treatment plant which has a remaining capacity of 2,424,620 gallons/day. Sewer service for the proposed project will be provided by the north county regional wastewater treatment plant, which has a remaining capacity of 482,777 gallons/day. Indian River County's potable water and wastewater treatment plants have adequate capacity to serve the proposed CDBG-ED Project as of the date of this letter, This letter does not guarantee that there will be capacity availability at the time that the project is really to connect to the county's water and wastewater facilities. Certification of Conformance With Zoning and Planning Requirements The proposed CDBG-ED Project is located in the RM -6, Multiple Family Residential (up to 6 unim'acre) zoning district. In that zoning district, assisted living facilities (ALF) are permitted as a special exception use. A special exception use is defined in the county's Land Development Regulations as a use that would not be appropriate generally or without restriction throughout a zoning district but which, if controlled as to number, area, location, or relation to the neighborhood, would promote the public health, safety, welfare, morals, order, comfort. convenience, appearance, prosperity, and the general welfare. Attachment l lists the requirements that must be met for a special exception use to he permitted in the RNI-6 zoning district. Certificate of Occupancy Requirernvals Uhaptcr918 of the Indian River County land Development Regulations requires that the propowd buildings that will he constructud as part of this CORE -ED Project be screed by County water artrl waste'A Ater racilitics in hider to receive a Certificatr of Chcup;mcy. It you hav c arty adtliti+-)nal questions tar ccanuncnts, please cat[ Prue Ralke. thecounty's Ecmrwmic Vc%ckVmant Plat na. as W 56-,-WX ts. cttrrtaion 124 v Sncerel , �Zl• � - 'i�'r-�� nncth R. M Girt Chaimian, Indian River County Board of County Commissioners A.ttadncnts I- Indian River County Land Development Regulations Section 971.28 (3) C� M 0 • SPECIFIC LAND t'SF.s or exceed applicable state star rds The applicant shall supply to t plan- ning division, prior to site pl approv- al. writtn acknowledgeme t from the state th t the proposed creation ar- ea(s) and`facil,ties Mee or exceed ap- plicable state standar The applicant slat! proviI a either six-foot opaque buffer or on hundr d fifty -foot setback between all utd r recreation areas and adjacen res` entially designated properties. 5. A Type "D" b Pf r will be required, ac- ceptable to th lanning department. �2) CiLIX and social n rri ship organization factlrties radministraov rrrtt,JI Fa) Distruts requi'r:nrtnistratiz e permit ap• prat -cal, (pursuan to to prouistnns of 971,1)4) MED. (b) Additional inj r soli n rcquirerrrents: 1. A wrilien tateY. t slxciFically describ- ing the tare of a organization and its tela unship to he permitted prin- cipal u s within t e hIED district; 2 A site fan meeting 11 of the require- of of Chapter 91 . 40 Cnierw Or civic and socwa membership or. I All Guch organizations kliallated to lie permitted princi uses Kttlun MID district;. 2. ufI'ering of the project '11 consist of Type `D" buffer where butting the /M ED district and Type -C"' for adjacent restdential properties. ,3r Group homes. Level 1. 11, 111, residential cen ter, and adult congregate lttrrtg facility +ACLFi 'adrritnrstratite permit and special exccptton+ �a� Dratrietsrequtrtrtgudminestratitrpermstep. protol, +'pursuant to the prarisiona of 971 tiff level I and ACLF (8 residents manimurn) R5-3 RS -6 RU R.M-3 RM 4 RM -6 RtIH-6 Alli -1. Uvid 11, .III, and ACLF in resi. dents max.mumi RM -B RM. 10 ItMH-tt 4L.M^v_:s W trill b) Nq(rwis requiring spec toI exception opprou. al, +'pursuant to the prix4siond of 971.05): Level 11, LII and ACLF (20 residents max- imum); RT -6 RM -3 RM -4 RM -6 IIMII.6; res- idential centers and ACI.F (21+ residents): RNf-3 RMA RM -6 RNI-8 RM -10 CL CG CH RNIH-6 RMH-(l. (c) Additional information requirements: 1. A site plan which denotes the location of all structures, parking faciiiti+es, and the proposed circulation plan, pursu- ant to the requirements of Chapter 914; 2. A floor plan showing the location, size, and space: utilisation of each room shall he submitted; 3. The applicant shall submit a signed af. fidavit stating that all applicable reg. ulationtt of the State of Florida and In- dian River County as currently exist have been satisfied, (d) Criteria for group homes: Level I, H, III, residential centers and adult congregate hv- ing facility. Group homes shall be distitr- guished by their resident capacity as fol- lows: 1, Level I group home orACLF, up to eight (b) residents including caretakers) per. shift; 2. Level II group home or ACLF, up to twelve ( T2) residents including c&retak- er(s) per shift; 3. Level III group home or ACLF, up to twenty (20) residents including care- taker(s) per shift; and 4. Residential centers or ACLF(noA Level 1, II, or Ill), twenty-one (21) or more residents including caretaker(s) per shift. lei "Chose group homes or ACLFs whose resi- dents are service -dependant persona requir. ing special protection or custodial care in order to meet their emotional and/or phys. cal needs must meet all licensing requuv_ menLs front the 1)ep; "mint of Health and Rehabilitative Services of the State of Flor- ie I The use shall satisfy sll4pplicshlr net ulatio" of the State o[ Florida and In. diary R'v'wr Co"It " as currvatly Brost, ffumo of 'j t 97128 IND WN RIiTR COUNTY CODE 2 The approving body shall determine space shall be provided for each bed that the proposed use is compatible with in a sleeping space for multiple oc- the surrounding neighborhood in terms cupancy, of land use intensity. The maximum al lowable land use intensity shall be com- puted c. Bathroom facilities- A full bath as follows: room with toilet, sink and tub or a Regarding single family toning dis- shower shall be provided for each tricts: five (5) residents. (number of allowable dwelling units) x (2.5 residents per dwell- ing unit) x I.5 = maximum num- ber of residents allowed b. Regarding multifamily and com• mercial zoning districts: (number of allowable dwelling units) x (2 residents per dwelling units x 1.5 = maximum number of residents allowed. In no case shall the maximum num- ber of residents allowed on a project site exceed the average maximum nu nber of residents allowed (as cal. culated by the above formula) on adjacent sites bordering the project site. Averaging for adjacent sites shall be based upon length of the common border between the project site and the adjacent site. 3. To avoid unsafe or unhealthy condi- tions that may be produced by the over- crowding of persona loving in these fa. cilities , a minimus floor area per person shall be required.. Floor area require - menta Shell be measured from interior walls of all rootna including closet space a 7bral inferior I'ving spurs A min- imum of two hundred (200) square feet of interior living space shall be provided per facility resident Interior living space shall include sleeping +pace and all otlher into• nor space accessible on a regular basis to all facility restdenus. b ,4llntmurn sloe in& aivai A mint• mam of elghty 1801 ssluArt frit shall be provided to each slrrping rpmc, far ttrtglr occupancy A g6irumum orssaty 1601 iquut f"t 4 Olt* Ping :. %- .. ', s t.:6 4. To avoid an undue concentration of group care facilities within residential neighborhoods, all such facilities with. in residential zoning districts shall he located at least one thousand two hun- dred (1,200) feet apart, measured from Property line to property line, unless exempted as €ollows. The separation dis- tance requirement and measurement shall not apply to group home or ACLF uses involving twenty -sine (2 1) or more residents, where such uses are Located on major arterial roadways. 5. If located in a single-family area, the home shall have the appearance of a singie-family home, Structural alter- ations or designs shall be of such a na- ture as to preserve the residential char- acter of the building. 5. 1f located in the AIR.I zoning district. the site shall have an 1,1 land use des- ignation. 7 The facility shall satisfy all applicable off-street parking requirements of Chapter 954. The facility Shell meet or exceed all open apace requirement, for the respective zoning district. 8 The maximum capacity of such facih• ties shall not exccxd the applicable num. ber permitted by the department of health and rehabilitative services 9 Group home permits are transferable If the type of resident/client changes or the resident eapaenty increases to such an extent that it would raise the facnl- sty to a higher level ,group home as dig. tart,g+usrhed by the doWtron. than factl it,y waist br rcavaluxtrd for an admif ustratsve p, -ml er spscsai rxc p- tMa approval g � r \ IP, r--_------ � I� .�--2 ------ M _ (. ¢ � - © . � � Cl) . � �� . ■ ■ � ■ § � � � ! --- , � rk . \!C- 8 , | fn ( 9 \ cy � A n IP, r--_------ I� ¢ � - . � Cl) 4) �� ■ © � § 0 � � ! . \!C- , fn 2 � r• _ . �� m - . I - � � ! � r• _ . �� m f If CRA Care Centers Project Locatioti Ju6sdic#ion Map Inset (Map _ A of ;!J Indlan (1X340, Indian River County Administrative Offices ,ludsdicti©n Map Inset (Map.3_ of3) dw U-1 0 0 a) 0 0 0 C) o Z 66th AVENue ($-CKUjANA RIVV I N � ` W TZ! 0 a) 0 0 0 C) o Z SSW - re 00 0 a) 0 0 0 C) o Z rtw.n ASTIAN 7—UFrr ZONE X u E U Indian River County r CRA Care Centers I Project Area Map April, 1999 AlkAl,�� ♦v[++�rt � -E __J I 1 C i Y z x V' Uo,� AAp �t3 3 IkC re5`) WLAer rf�]f3Cri'� l.ri�. NOTE 1: Buildinq and Parkin will riot be located '.[ in the 100 year flood Main, N MULL rup m"Ct FIRM RON INSURAW RAT( YAP INDIAN RIVER COUNTY FLOIUDA ANC ""M"MRAT'ED A RLA,s Wtl V or 149 f YM�a \we W\ y I NOTE 1: - CD8G-ED Pundf W1 It '60 us... No swam It�irsr r "Film" an t0 4fflft but1d/Rg i t,atlding construction 'S"d purchAsod t lrr t ur.., April 14, 1999 Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council Dear Sir or Madame: Encloser] for your review are portions of the CDBG-ED grant application that has been submitted to the Florida Department of Community Affairs. The enclosed information consists of.. 1. The Application Summary (CDBG-E-2) 2. All Maps (CDBG-E-7) 3. Historic Preservation Check List (CDBG-E-8) Please send complimentary copies of ally correspondence that is sent to Indian River County to the CD13G Section at DCA. Sincerely, Andy Easton April 14, 1999 % l l 1nCIA Florida State Clearing House L'V N/ Florida Department of Community Affairs 2555 Shumard Oak Blvd, Tallahassee, Florida 32399 Dear Sir or Madame: Enclosed for your review are portions of the CDBG-ED grant application that has been submitted to the Florida Department of Community Affairs, The enclosed information consists of- The f Tice Application Summary (CDBG-E.2) 2. All Maps (CDBG-E-7) Historic Preservation. Check List (CDBG-E-8) Please send complimentary copies of any correspondence that is sent to Indian River County to the CDBG Section at DCA. Sincerely, Andy Easton SOLUTION " _ 16 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OFCOUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AUTHORIZING THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR TO MAKE APPLICATION TO THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS FOR AN ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT. RlAtR•}AR WHEREAS, Indian River County Is experiencing a need for full-time jobs: WHEREAS it is the desire of the Indian River County Board of County Commissioners to lower the county's average annual unemployment rate to within two percentage points of the State of Florida's average annual unemployment rate; and WHEREAS the proposed. Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) application is consistent with the Indian River County comprehensive plan; NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNTY COMMISSION OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA; that SECTION 1. The Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) program Is declared to be a workable program for providing financing for a prosect that will provide jobs to low - to -moderate income persons as indicated in the proposed 1999/2000 CDBG application. SECTION 2. The Board of County Commissioners hereby directs the County Clerk to sign all necessary certifications for the Community Development Block Grant application. SECTION 3. The Board of County Comnilssioners directs the Community Development Director to execute and submit the attached application to the Florida Department of Community Affairs for state approval,. SECTION 4 The Board or county Commissioners authorlxes and directs the 111SOLUT1011 99- 16 Uammuaitr Deielapment Dlre-,;or to submit additional israrmation In a tirewh Mnaoser as may he required by The Florida Department of Community Affairs. SECTION S. The Board of County Commissioners authorizes the C'ommunily Development Director to sign any subscquent forms as needed for the CDBG application and project. SECTION G. The Indian. River County comprehensive plan is hereby adopted as the County's community development plan. SECTION 7. This Resolution shall take effect immediately upon its passage. The foregoing resolution was offered by Commissioner Adams , and seconded by Commissioner S t a n h r i d B p , and being put to a vote, the vote was as follows: Chairman Kenneth R. Macht Aye Vice Chairman, Fran B. Adams Aye Commissioner Caroline D. Girm Nay Commissioner Ruth M. Stanbridge Aye_ Commissioner John W. Tippin Aye The Chairman thereupon declared the resolution duly passed and adopted this 20th day of April, 1999, BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIA VER COLIN BY: enneth R. Nicht, Chairman w ATTEST BY: Jeff arion, Clerk f U�YC i,i'tl�,'`SSt18iliA_ftS.N'pd �tefli,. _ �'� ��Y I wry rw�r cr �+er�se Oi�N l M H FORM CDBc-&10 PROPOSED NEW JOB CREATION INFORMATION SUBMITTED BY CRA CARE CENTERS, INC, JOI) TITLE OF CREATEDJOB HOURLY TOTAL FTE TOTAL FIE TOTAL TOTAL ANNUAL PROPOSED PAY RATE JOBS TO BF JOBS TO BE ANNUAL, PAYROLL FOR HIRING DATE OR dNNG'AL CREATED CREATED PAYROLL. JOSS TO BE MON YEAR p1SY FOR UMI FSR THIS J011 CREATED FOR PERSONS TITLE Litt PERSONS Administrator $44,000 1 0 $44.000 0 6140 Admin/Fiscal 23,000 1 0 23,000 0 6100 Assistant RN 38,000 .3 0 11,400 0 6/01 Social Director 29,000 1 0 29,000 0 6101 Receptionist 17,500 .5 0 8,750 0 W01 CNA 16,200 14.5 14 234,900 226,800 6101-1102 Lead CNA 18,000 3 0 54,000 0 6101 LPN 30,000 4.5 0 135,000 0 6101 Chef 2.8,000 1 0 28,000 0 6101 Cook 17,000 1 0 17,000 0 6/01 Assistant Cook 15,120 5 5 75,600 75,600 5181-142 Housekeeper 15,120 1.5 1 22,280 15,120 6rOf Grounds Keeper 17,000 1 1 517,000 $17,000 1102 35.3• 21•* $689,930 7334,520 TOTALS '26 coumed for grant worins I>urp¢t+r% "14 ccantcd fur star, �at)tinj p+urlk, CDBG-E-10 SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION THAT MUST BE SUBMITTED WITH THE APPLICATION PARTICIPATING PARTY(S) CURRENT EMPLOYEE INFORMATION --Norte NAME OF PARTICIPATING TARTY _ SRAC,, Center Inc _ JOB TITLE OF HOURLY TOTAL FTEj gTAL €7t TOTAL ANNUAL TOTAL ANNUAL RE'fiAINEp JOB r'AY HATE JABS Tt] $O$S Tb BE F�AYROLL PAYROLLFOR OR ANNUAL RETAINFOETAMEO FOR THIS Jp$ JOBS HELD BY PAY RATES Y LMl TITLE Lhfl PERSONS ERSONS none none none f none Inone f no,, TOTALS