The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1999-30740 40 6 • BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS 1840 25th Street, Vero Beach, Florida 32160 Telephone. (561) 567-8000 December 7, 1999 Mr. Yaping Wang St. Johns River Water Management District P.O. Box 1429 Palatka, FL 32178-1429 RE: Indian River County Master Stormwater Management Plan Funding Grant Application Dear Mr. Wang: V -3n1 This is to advise that the Indian River County Board of County Commissioners does support the referenced project. Since the Indian River Lagoon has been designated as surface water of critical state concern and considering the regional nature of the project, the future NPDES requirements and other issues specified in the Indian River County Grant Application, we feel the results of the study will benefit the entire community. We are requesting the Governing Board give the application every consideration and approve the grant as requested. Sincerely, LY tic Wit, e ?� Tin R. Macht, hairman Indian River County Board of County Commissioners KRM/ki m ST. JOHNS RIVED WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT "I`ORMWATI"' t MANACJI MI-,N't' I'l�OJI',"C I'S CC` ST -SHAT Ii PROGRAM AI'PLICA`riON PACKt, r FY 1999-2000 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY TY PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT 184025 TH STREET VERO BEACH, FL., 32960 PHONE 561-567-8000 FAX 561-778-9391 STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PROJECTS cos'r-snARE PROGRAM FY 1999-2000 Al"I'LICATION FORM Please answer all the questions in this form. Applicants are encouraged to supply the information requested by using only the space provided on the application forms (page 13-1 through B-6 only). Supporting documents are not necessary. Please type or print clearly answers to the following questions in the spaces provided. 1. Are You Located in the Indian River Lagoon Area? (check one) Yes 1140 F1 2. Name of Applicant INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA 3. Name, Address, & Phone Numbers of Project Manager Name JAMES W. DAVIS, N.E. Mailing Address 1840 25Th STREET _City VERO BEACI I . ZIP 12960 Phone 561-567-8000 EXT. 245 FAX 561-778-9391 4Project Narne -E,—AST COUNTYMASTER s^r0RMWATFR MANAGEMENT PLAN I 5. Is This New or Continuing Project? (check one) New 10-i Continuing .-If this is a continuing project, has the project received any grants or funds from the District and when and how much? G. Matching Funds Request Amount of money requested L1L0_A)0__ Total project cost S 160,000 mm Percentage of total project cost to be covered by the District — -_.___- 7. -----7. Project Surnmary REPARE A MASTER STORM WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR THE EAST INDIAN RIVER OUNTY-INDIAN RIVER LAGOON WATERSHED LOCATED BETWEEN THE ONE MILL, TLANTIC COASTAL RIDGE AND THE 10 MILE ATLANTIC COASTAL RIDGE (1-95) WITHIN HE INDIAN RIVER FARMS WATER CONTROL DISTRICT. ,If it is a 111111ti-Pliase project, Please include only the total cost for the phase(s) that request for District grant, B -I ae 8. Detailed project description l}. Please provide a description of the proposed project. Include address, section, township, range. Identify the basin or watershed in which the project will take place (A separate map attachment is acceptable and 3 copies are required). Does the project promote flood protection, demonstrate Best Management Practices (BMPs), or implement STORMWATER utilities. Is this a proposal for storm water design studies, STORMWATER master planning, or construction or implementation projects which include innovative enhancements or technology. Is the project already underway or still in planning stage? --1.0 points A. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT BETWEEN THE ONE MILE ATLANTIC COASTAL RIDGE AND INTERSTATE HIGHWAY 1-95 (TEN MILL: RIDGE) WITHIN INDIAN RIVER COUNTY LIES 7HE INDIAN RIVER FARMS WATER CONTROL DISTRICT (A FS CH. 299 DRAINAGE DISTRICT) WATERSHED AREA. THIS APPROXIMATE 50,000 ACRE WATERSHED INCLUDES ALMOST ALL OF TOWNSHIP 33 SOUTH, RANGE 39 EAST; SECTIONS 4 - 9. 15-22.27-35 IN TOWNSHIP 32 SOUTH, RANGE 39 EAST; AND SECTIONS 1-5, 9-16,22-27,34-36, IN TOWNSHIP 33 SOUTH, RANGE 30 EAST (SEE ATTACHED MAP LABELED EXHIBIT -A- AND "A-1"), THREE PRIMARY OUTFALLS, THE MAIN RELIEF CANAL, THE NORTH RELIEF CANAL, AND THE SOUTH RELIEF CANAL, DISCHARGE APPROXIMATELY 100 MILLION GALLONS OF RUNOFF OVER THE WATERSHED AREA DURING AN AVERAGE DAY. THE RUNOFF IS STORED OR ATTENUATED WITHIN THE 100 YEAR FLOOD -PLAIN BOUNDARY PRIOR TO THE OUTFALLS BEING ABLE TO DISCHARGE IT. FLOODING OCCURS WITHIN THE 100 YEAR FLOOD PLAIN AND IN LOCALIZED AREAS. OLDER DEVELOPMENTS WITHIN THE 50,000 ACRE WATERSHED PROVIDE MINIMAL OR NO WATER QUALITY TREATMENT. THE FRESHWATER RUNOFF DEGRADES THE QUALITY OF THE BRACKISH ESTUARINE ENVIRONMENT, INCREASE SUSPENDED SOLID LOADING IN SEAGRASS AREAS, AND POLLUTES THE INDIAN RIVER LAGOON. THE PROPOSED PROJECT IS TO DEVELOP A MASTER STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN COMPRISED Or RETENTIONIDETENTION PONDS CONNECTED TO THE INDIAN RIVER FARMS WATER CONTROL DISTRICT CANAL SYSTEM WHICH WILL REDUCE FLOODING AND REMOVE STORMWATER POLLUTANTS. PRELIMINARY MAPPING OF THE PROJECT HAS BEGUN. 2). Is the project proposed to meet NPDES requirements'? please explain how this project will do that. . 10 points THE NPDES STORMWATER PHASE 11 INTERIM RULE HAS LISTED INDIAN RIVER COUNTY AS A SMALL MUNICIPAL SEPARATE STORM SEWER SYSTEM (MS4) SINCE THIS WATERSHED AND OTHERS DISCHARGE INTO THE INDIAN RIVER LAGOON, IN 2001, INDIAN RIVER COUNTY WILL BE REQUIRED TO IDENTIFY TOTAL MAXIMUM DAILY LOADING (TMDLs) FOR THIS AREA. THIS PROJECT WILL TREAT RUNOFF TO REMOVE POLLUTANTS, THEREBY ACHIEVING REDUCING POLLUTANT LOADING FOR THE INDIAN RIVER LAGOON WATERSHED. THE INDIAN RIVER LAGOON HAS BEEN DESIGNATED A SURFACE WATER OF CRITICAL STATE CONCERN AND THE PROJECT AREA HAS BEEN IDENTIFIED BY THE IRL-SWIM PLAN AND IRL-CCMP AS "PROBLEM AREAS" SUCH AS VERO BEACH. SJRW MD Reviewer's Initial- SG2000- Item (1) - 10 SJRWMD Reviewer's Initial - SC2000- Item (2) -10 B-2 El F 3). blow well does the project correspond to the mission goals, priorities and strategies as specified in the District Water Management Plan, Local GOVERNMENT Water Resource Atlas and SWIM Plans, or other District project goals? (i.e. NBP, Upper St, Johns River Basin, Lake Jesup, PLRGs, etc,)-- 15 points THE PROJECT IS CONSISTENT WITH THE FOLLOWING GOALS OF THE ST, JOHNS RIVER WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT - DISTRICT WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN (MARCH. 1995) FLOOR PROTECTION - TO MINIMIZE THE POTENTIAL FOR DAMAGE FROM FLOODS BY PROTECTING AND RESTORING THE NATURAL WATER STORAGE AND CONVEYANCE FUNCTIONS OF FLOOD PRONE AREAS WITH PREFERENCE GIVEN TO THE USE OF NON-STRUCTURAL SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT METHODS (PG. 40) " THIS PROJECT WILL PROVIDE A STORMWATER MASTER PLAN TO REDUCE FLOODING BY WATER STORAGE WITHIN THE 100 -YEAR FLOODPLAIN, WATER QUALITY MANAGEMENT • TO PROTECT EXISTING SURFACE AND GROUND WATER QUALITY FROM DEGRADATION AND, WHERE- APPROPRIATE, TO IMPROVE AND RESTORE THE QUALITY OF WATERS NOT CURRENTLY MEETING WATER QUALITY STANDARDS (PG. 60) THIS PROJECT WILL PROVIDE A STORMWATER MASTER PLAN TO CAPTURE UNTREATED STORMWATER RUNOFF FROM URBANIZED AND URBANIZING AREAS. THE RUNOFF WILL BE DETAINEDIRETAINED TO REMOVE POLLUTANTS. DURING PERIODS OF LOW RAINFALL, FRESHWATER DISCHARGE TO THE INDIAN RIVER LAGOON WILL BE ELIMINATED, DURING WET SEASON CONDITIONS THE DISCHARGE WILL BE TREATED BY DETENTION PRIOR TO REDUCED DISCHARGE TO THE INDIAN RIVER LAGOON. THIS PROJECT IS SPECIFICALLY INCLUDED ON PANE 298 OF THE PLAN AS FOLLOWS; "CREATION OF LOCAL. STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLANS" TO IMPROVE Ttw QUALITY OF STORMWATER RUNOFF. (SEE ATTACHED PAGES -EXHIBIT `B") (CONTINUED ON SEPARATE PAGES] 4). If the project is for the purpose of flood protection, i4 flooding causing property damage? It there flooding above finished floors, nuisance flooding, or major damage to properties? Iftire project mainly addresses water quality concerns, will the project improve water duality and by how much? Coes data show a trend in declining water quality of the receiving water body? - 10 poiw'; THE PROJECT WILL PROVIDE FLOOD PROTECTION, FLOODING OCCURS IN THE WATERSHED AREA, PARTICULARLY ALONG 35TH AVENUE SOUTH OF 1211-1 STREET. PROPERTY DAMAGE DOES OCCUR, THE DEVELOPMENT OF A STORMWATER MASTER PLAN WILL IDENTIFY THE AREAS WHERE FLOOD WATERS CAN BE STORED. THE LOCAL NEWSPAPER RECENTLY PUBLISHED THE ATTACHED EDITORIAL CARTOON (SEE EXHIBIT C ). THE MASTER PLAN WILL ADDRESS WATER QUALITY CONCERNS (FRESHWATER AND POLLUTANT LOADING) IN THE INDIAN RIVER LAGOON. A POLLUTANT LOAD REDUCTION MODEL FOR THE INDIAN RIVER LAGOON IS CURRENTLY BEING PROPOSED BY THE SJRWMD. EXISTING WATER QUALITY DATA DOES SHOW A DECLINING WATER QUALITY TREND IN THE RECEIVING WATER BODY, THE INDIAN RIVER LAGOON. SEE ATTACHED PAGE. SJRWMD Reviewer's Initial - SG2000- Item(3) - 15 SJRWMD Reviewer's Initial - SG2000- Item (4) - 10 B-3 • • 3). (CONTINUED) THE PROJECT COMPLIES WITH JOINT STRATEGIES OF THE SJRWMD LOCAL GOVERNMENT WATER RESOURCE ATLAS FOR INDIAN RIVER COUNTY - FLOOD PROTECTION FLOODPLAIN MANAGEMENT - JOINT STRATEGIES #1 - "COLLABORATE WHERE FEASIBLE ON DESIGN OF MAJOR COUNTY STORMWATER PROJECTS",, AND STRATEGY #2 - "ENHANCE DISTRICT PARTICIPATION IN REGIONAL FLOOD STUDIES. THE "EXISTING AND POTENTIAL FUTURE NONPOINT SOURCE POLLUTANT LOADING INDIAN RIVER COUNTY" DIAGRAM SHOWS THE STUDY AREA TO BE THE "HIGHEST ESTIMATED EXISTING NONPOINT SOURCE POLLUTANT LOADS COMPARED TO THE REST OF THE DISTRICT." SEVERAL STORET WATER QUALITY STATIONS IN THE INDIAN RIVER LAGOON DOWNSTREAM OF THE STUDY AREA HAVE "ELEVATED POLLUTION LEVELS" WHICH THE STORMWATER PLAN WILL PROVIDE SOLUTIONS TO CORRECT, (SEE EXHIBIT -D-) THE STORMWATER MASTER PLAN PROJECT CORRESPONDS TO Tl 'INDIAN RIVER LAGOON COMPREHENSIVE CONSERVATION AND MANAGEMENT PLAN • NOV 19915" ACTION FSD 9: " INVESTIGATE THE POTENTIAL OF STRENGTHENING EXISTING STORMWATER OR FRESHWATER DISCHARGE MANAGEMENT PROGRAMS" (PG 113). THE STUDY WILL INCLUDE RECOMMENDATIONS TO STORE FRESHWATER AND ELIMINATE OR REDUCE DISCHARGE TO THE INDIAN RIVER LAGOON, (SEE EXHIBIT -E-) O 4. CONTINUED IN 1864, WOODWARD CLYDE, CONSULTANTS UNDER CONTRACT TO THE INDIAN RIVER LAGOON NATIONAL ESTUARY PROGRAM(LRLNEP), PUBLISHED EIGHT VOLUMES OF TECHNICAL REPORTS DESCRIBING THE HISTORICAL DATA REVIEWED, THEIR ASSESSMENT OF THE DATA REVIEWED, AND ITS RELIABILITY. THE THREE REPORTS CONSIDERED PERTINENT FOR INDIAN RIVER COUNTY ARE THE FOLLOWING: STATUS AND TRENDS SUMMARY OF THE LAGOON, THE PRELIMINARY WATER AND SEDIMENT QUALITY ASSESSMENT OF THE INDIAN RIVER LAGOON, AND LOADINGS ASSESSMENT OF THE INDIAN RIVER LAGOON. IN THESE VOLUMES OF LITERATURE, THE INDIAN RIVER COUNTY AREA OF THE LAGOON (FROM SEBASTIAN INLET TO THE 5T. LUCIE COUNTY) IN DESIGNATED BY WOODWARD CLYDE AS SEGMENT -3 (APPENDIX 4). SEGMENT 3, KNOWN AS THE SOUTH CENTRAL INDIAN RIVER LAGOON BASIN, IS FURTHER DIVIDED INTO 23 SUB•BASINS WITHIN THE BASIN. THE LARGEST POLLUTANT LOADINGS IN THIS SEGMENT ARE CONTRIBUTED BY THE LARGE BASINS THAT HAVE BEEN EXTENDED BY DITCHING AND MAJOR CANAL SYSTEMS, AS HAS OCCURRED IN THE INDIAN RIVER FARMS WATER CONTROL DISTRICT AREA, WHERE DITCHING HAS BEEN CONNECTED TO A CANAL SYSTEM AND THE INDIAN RIVER LAGOON. THE HIGHEST LOADINGS IN THE SOUTH CENTRAL INDIAN RIVER LAGOON SEGMENT OCCUR IN THE INDIAN RIVER FARMS WATER CONTROL DISTRICT SUB -BASINS, DUE TO THE CHARACTERISTICS OF THIS URBAN BUILT -OUT AREA WHICH UTILIZES EXTENSIVE DITCHING AND CANAL SYSTEMS DRAINING TO THE INDIAN RIVER LAGOON. WHEN COMPARED TO OTHER SEGMENTS THROUGHOUT THE INDIAN RIVER LAGOON REGION, IT WAS CALCULATED BY WOODWARD CLYDE THAT SEGMENT 4(ST. LUCIE COUNTY AREA) ACCOUNTS FOR THE HIGHEST SEGMENT•WIDE POLLUTANT LOADS, FOLLOWED BY SEGMENT 3 THE INDIAN RIVER COUNTY AREA, WOODWARD CLYDE NOTED THAT INDIAN RIVER FARMS WATER CONTROL DISTRICT AND SEBASTIAN RIVER WATER CONTROL DISTRICT ARE AMONG THE HIGHEST AREA LOADING RATES FOR THE ENTIRE WATER BODY. WOODWARD CLYDE ATTRIBUTES THESE HIGH LOADINGS TO THE INTENSE AGRICULTURAL USES OR THE COMBINATIONS OF URBAN AND AGRICULTURAL DEVELOPMENT. THE PROJECT WILL IDENTIFY SOLUTIONS TO FLOODING AND IMPROVING WATER QUALITY, THIS INDIAN RIVER LAGOON DOWN -STREAM OF THIS WATERSHED IS EXHIBITING SIGNS THAT WATER QUALITY PROBLEMS ARE DEVELOPING, THESE SIGNS INCLUDE REDUCTIONS IN SEAGRASS DENSITY AND COVERAGE OR INCREASING CLOSURES OR RECLASSIFICATION OF SHELLFISH HARVESTING AREAS. E-1 • 5) What is the impact of the problem to be addressed by the proposed project on the surface water ecosystem? What is the classification of the receiving water body? Does harm to the receiving water body occur on a frequent basis? -- 15 points THE IMPACT OF THE PROBLEMS ADDRESSED BY THE PROPOSED PROJECT ON THE INDIAN RIVER LAGOON ECOSYSTEM IS THAT EXCESSIVE FRESH WATER/UNTREATED STORMWATER RUNOFF IS DISCHARGED FROM THE WATERSHED INTO THE SURFACE WATER ECOSYSTEM. THIS EXCESSIVE SLUG OF FRESHWATER REDUCES SALINITY IN THE LAGOON, CAUSES SILTATION OF SEAGRASS BEDS, AND POLLUTES THE ESTUARINE ENVIRONMENT, THE CLASSIFICATION OF THE RECEIVING WATER BODY IS CLASS III WATER OF THE STATE NEAR THE VERO BEACH AREA (SEE ATTACHED MAP - EXHIBIT -F-) AND FLORIDA OUTSTANDING WATERS. THE ATTACHED NOV, 14, 1999 VERO BEACH PRESS JOURNAL NEWSPAPER EDITORIAL MARKED EXHIBIT "G" EFFECTIVELY DESCRIBES THE IMPACT OF THE PROBLEM. HARM TO THE RECEIVING WATER BODY OCCURS REGULARLY, AT LEAST TWICE PER YEAR TO A LARGE SCALE, TO CONCLUDE, IN SEGMENT 3. THE EFFECTS OF THE SEBASTIAN RIVER AND THE INDIAN RIVER FARMS WATER CONTROL DISTRICT DISCHARGES ARE OBVIOUS, AS SALINITY VALUES DROP TO ABOUT 26.0 PPT NEAR VERO NORTH, MAIN AND SOUTH CANAL OUTFALLS. THIS PART OF THE LAGOON HAS A SMALL SURFACE AREA SO EVAPORATION 19 REDUCED AS WELL. ANOTHER EXAMPLE OF THE EFFECT OF THE FRESHWATER DISCHARGE INTO THIS SEGMENT IS COLOR, ACCORDING TO WOODWARD CLYDE, WET SEASON COLOR VALUES ARE HIGHER THAN DRY SEASON VALUES BY A FACTOR OF 3, INDICATING DISCHARGE OF COLORED, TANNIN -LADEN WATERS DURING WET SEASON STORMWATER AND GROUNDWATER FLOW. TOTAL PHOSPHORUS VALUES AROUND THE THREE VERO CANAL DISCHARGE POINTS (SOUTH, MAIN AND NORTH CANALS, AS WELL AS THE SEBASTIAN RIVER, THE FELLSMERE CANAL AND C-64, ARE SUBSTANTIALLY HIGHER THAN ELSEWHERE IN THE LAGOON. TOTAL KJELDAHL NITROGEN IS ALSO ELEVATED IN THIS PORTION OF THE LAGOON BETWEEN WABASSO AND VERO BEACH, INDICATING THAT THIS ENTIRE SEGMENT OF THE LAGOON MAY BE AFFECTED BY DISCHARGES FROM THE SEBASTIAN RIVER AND THE INDIAN RIVER FARMS WATER CONTROL DISTRICT. SEE ATTACHED PAGES 6). Is this project approved by referendum, approved by the county/city commission, or strongly supported by the Public? --5 Points THE PLANNING PROJECT HAS BEEN APPROVED BY THE INDIAN RIVER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS (12107/99 MEETING) AND THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE INDIAN RIVER FARMS WATER CONTROL DISTRICT (F.S, CHAPTER 298 DRAINAGE DISTRICT) DURING ITS 11/11/99 MEETING. THE PROJECT IS STRONGLY SUPPORTED (SEE EXHIBIT 'I-) M(W511) Reviewer's Initial - S(12000- Item (5) - Is SJRWMD Reviewer's Initial - S02000- Item (6) - 5 B-4 5, CONTINUED AC'T`IVITIES PROPOSED IN INDIAN RIVER COUNTY'S SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN ARE EXPECTED TO REDUCE SOLIDS, SEDIMENTS, ORGANIC MA'I"TER. FRESH WATER AND NUTRIENTS DISCHARGED FROM INDIAN RIVER COUNTS"S STORMWATER SYSTEMS. THESE ACTIONS WILL INFLUENCE LAGOON TRENDS IN A POSTCIVE DIRECTION. TO DATE. POLLUTANT LOAD REDUCTION GOALS (PLRGS) HAS NOT BEEN ESTABLISHED FOR THE INDIAN RIVER COUNTY AREA t OR FOR OTHER WATERS IN THE VICINITY, THE ST. JOHNS RIVER WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT (SJRWMD) HAS INITIATED THE, PLRtI AND IS REFINING 'TIiF MODEL TO DF V[ I,OP GOATS FOR THIS AREA. do • 7). Does the project offer cost-sharing and how much? Is the project a cooperative effort with more than one entity? (If there are other entities participating cost -share, evidence of commitment from them should be provided), have the project or some tasks/phases of the projects received the District funding in the last three years? Has the applicant established a stable, dedicated funding source such as MSTII MSRU, or Stormwater Utility for the proposed project? Are funding mechanisms in place or planned? The applicant needs to provide evidence of project funding. -- 10 points THE PROJECT OFFERS COST SHARING BY INDIAN RIVER COUNTY IN THE AMOUNT OF $40,000 OR 26%. IN ADDITION, THE INDIAN RIVER FARMS WATER CONTROL DISTRICT (A F.S. CHAPTER 298 DRAINAGE) WILL PROVIDE VALUABLE IN-KIND SERVICES SUCH AS CANAL WATER LEVELS, STAFF SUPPORT, AND FIELD ASSISTANCE. THE ATTACHED LETTER FROM THE INDIAN RIVER FARMS WATER CONTROL DISTRICT IS EVIDENCE OF COMMITMENT, NONE OF THE TASKS/ PHASES OF THE PROJECT HAVE RECEIVED PAST DISTRICT FUNDING WITHIN THE PAST THREE YEARS. THE INDIAN RIVER FARMS WATER CONTROL DISTRICT (F.S. CHAPTER 298 DRAINAGE DISTRICT) IS A STABLE DEDICATED FUNDING SOURCE. WHICH FUNDS MAINTENANCE OF THE PRIMARY CANAL NETWORK WITHIN THIS WATERSHED, INDIAN RIVER COUNTY WILL MAINTAIN THE LARGE RETENTION/DETENTION SYSTEMS IDENTIFIED BY THE MASTER PLAN USING GENERAL FUND/MSTU REVENUE, THE PLANNING STUDY WILL IDENTIFY DESIGN, CONSTRUCTION, AND MAINTENANCE FUNDING ALTERNATIVES AND RECOMMEND A FUNDING PLAN. THE COUNTY HAS BUDGETED $1,000,000 FOR STORMWATER PROJECTS USING THE LOCAL OPTION ONE CENT SALES TAX DURING 199912000. (SEE EXHIBIT -J-) 8). Please state the financial need of the applicant. What is the applicant's per capita income based On 1990 census? Would the project be completed without funding assistance? -- 5 points THE APPLICANT HAS $40,000 AVAILABLE TO FUND A PORTION OF THE COST FOR A STORMWATER MASTER PLAN IN THE PROJECT AREA. DUE TO THREE OTHER STORMWATER CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS CURRENTLY PROGRAMMED, FUNDS TO PAY THE ENTIRE COST OF THE PROJECT ARE NOT AVAILABLE. THE APPLICANTS PER CAPITA INCOME BASED ON THE 1990 CENSUS IS $17,825 (SEE ATTACHED EXHIBIT "H") WITHOUT FUNDING ASSISTANCE, THE PROJECT WOULD NOT BE COMPLETED. SJRWMD Reviewer's Initial - SC2000- Item (7) - 10 SJRWMD Reviewer's Initial SG2000- Item (8) - 5 B-5 L-1 • !I r, Will the proposed project require permits from tile District and/or other government Agencies yes, explain the type of permit needed and the estimated time frame to secure the required permit, What is the estimated time that is required to complete the entire project or the portion of the project that requires cost -share? (If this project has more than one tasks, the District would not cost -share those that are already underway) -- 10 points THE MASTER PLANNING PROJECT WILL NOT REQUIRE PERMITS FROM THE DISTRICT OR OTHER GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES AT THIS TIME, THE ENTIRE MASTER PLANNING STUDY WILL BE COMPLETE WITHIN AN 18 MONTH PERIOD BEGINNING JUNE, 2000, 10). Please provide a brief work plan including major tasks to be accomplished, milestones and deliverables. A detailed project budget by tasks, their associated cost, and funding obligation of the proposed funding entity is also required, 'rhe applicant shall identify whether tile proposed work is done in-house or contractual work and how the grant money will be spent and whether the applicant's share is cash or in-kind services. (An example of a project budget is provided in EXHIBIT -A on Page B-7 as a guideline) - 10 points WORK PLAN PROJECT START-UPIPUBLIC AWARENESS DATA COLLECTION/INVENTORY OF SYSTEM/GIS MAPPING (TECH REPT #1) PRELIMINARY PLAN DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION WITH REGULATORY AGENCIES PLAN & FUNDING ALTERNATIVES PUBLIC PRESENTATION/BCC & IRFWCD SELECTION OF ALTERNATIVE (TECH REPORT #2) FINAL PLAN DEVELOPMENT/FINAL REPORT "' jRWMD Reviewer's Initial - S JRWMD Reviewer's Initial - JRWMD Reviewer's Initial - SG2000- SG2000- SG2000- B-6 item (9) -5 Item (10) -11 Total 410 • EXHIBIT •A• EAST INDIAN RIVER COUNTY INDIAN RIVER FARMS WATER CONTROL DISTRICT WA`['ERSFIED t •i• i t�� r A, srr.f'.• tr.. r..t AIC .� ss iy...��..." �Yf" -ir--ort— r,21[.'�. 5, � • {E @" fir."Y["1'�S' ..' ... 3 • �–•.y�^�^ � Y4 � IFiq �. ' ^i'w-%`�� 7 �r' � F�ev.n \ ,.. ,..,.�. � 4 R t•.m j,..YF--'�''"- rk � � _r � •;t `l � r {F � •: t n brio by B covnrr -',� ,... ... �• '_ .__._�.-- "' ; _ isT �/,crc �ovrrrr i i � Y I• y► r� �� j p d J. r 0 El Cl issue: Existing and Proiected Surface Water Qualify Problems in the South Indian River Lagoon The Vern Beach area is adVi'rscly affected by urban storn-nvater runoff and XVWTP discharges. Additional surface water degradation is projected from residential development In presently undeveloped and agricultural areas located to the north and south of Vero Beach. Indian River County has a drainage element in its comprehensive plan and plans to implement stormwater regulations. The City and County do not have stormwater utilities. Policy. Coordinate with water control districts and local governnnents in Indian River County to improve the quality of stormwater runoff. ISWQ311 Tasks, Work with Indian River Farms Water Control District to evaluate the potential for treating runoff generated in areas outside of Vero Beach. 29 SJawrID - DI5,1'RIcT tdATJaz h1ANA(MMENr PUAN MPRCIt 1995 Intwaled Plan a EXHIBIT "D° L Iridian River Couniv 11olicy_ Itelc on the Indian River Lagoon 5tNt141 program as the primary mechanism for addressing, surface water quality Issues in the basun. }SWQlSj Tasks. implement the projects recommended in the SHIM plan regarding water Im! ildirnent .Ieiall"", regulation and vivlorcement, public awareness, and administration, planning, and coordination. • t c�orrlrn+,rn�l adopt, and vnturcC PLI'Gs for the Sebastian River. r' Responsible M11cY I e*+n Slrct.'.�+� lwsourt-v Monal,einvol,'Ind entily. Pidnning lit Acquisition Benchmarks. • Adoption of • Improvement in 1111, surface water quality • Increase in seagrass density and. ioverago !p jS4y I,,00rdinaty with DEP to implement the 1N'41t"TP `No Discharge" frill, JSwQ?lgj 'Basks. ► Enforce the WWTP "No Dischary e" bill through consumptive use permitting, + Coordowte SjltWMD con%umpllve uta• permtttint, with DIA, WWII' permitting. • Utilize the surface water quality data nchvork to identify problems 'ISSOkIMI' l with pot kagk, ov.111114t111 plants .'Ind ACptIC b}'�a4`I11!. • Coordinate with HRS and Indian River County to enforce septic tank regulations, Responsible Resource Management and Water Resources entity. Benchmarks. Reduction in the number of households starved by septic systems • improvement in IRI_ surface water quality related to seagtass viability • Increase in seagrass density and coyerare issue: Existing and Proiected Surface Water Qualify Problems in the South Indian River Lagoon The Vern Beach area is adVi'rscly affected by urban storn-nvater runoff and XVWTP discharges. Additional surface water degradation is projected from residential development In presently undeveloped and agricultural areas located to the north and south of Vero Beach. Indian River County has a drainage element in its comprehensive plan and plans to implement stormwater regulations. The City and County do not have stormwater utilities. Policy. Coordinate with water control districts and local governnnents in Indian River County to improve the quality of stormwater runoff. ISWQ311 Tasks, Work with Indian River Farms Water Control District to evaluate the potential for treating runoff generated in areas outside of Vero Beach. 29 El D 1, IV. Integrated flan L`€,xr, • htcognize the liceLi+ of Sc r+r — +% Lien f i RG, for watersheds within the Indian Ktyer Lagoon Basin • Offer technical o+ ,i. tance and I''A", maps for torrnw ate r },lanntmt: to Vero Beach .and Indian Rivet �:,auntc Responsible Resource Management and Planning & Acqutstmn entity, i� � Benchmarks. • Cooperation w•tih Indian River harms ko titer Control C?tstrtct • Creation of local stormwater management plan, a ' * Increase to seagrass density and coverage Policy: Rely an the SWIM program as the pntnary mechanism for addressing; surfaces e r water quality issues in the Indian River Lagoon tjastn. 1SWQ11 1 Polis : Coordinate with LEEP to implement the WW'l"P Dischargw- bill. 11,tVQI91 f t Ground Water u The SJRWM(7 has an ongoing program for data collection and rnonttnztn}; of ground water resources. 'Technical reports on ground water resource availability, o ground wotvr flow model, recharge mapping, and a ;saltwater Intrusion stud%, have been completed hV 41RMNID staff. The water quality of the surfictal aquifer varies v: till location In g neral, the chloride concentrations are within state water qualttV standards for }-rouble water. The surficual ' aquifer is also subject to contamination from herbicides, Pesticides, and other chemicals as well as high concentrations of chlorides from the Floridan aquiter. E,JIZWM D continuos to track the monitorial; wells a:: park of the Needs' and wcaurc-v. Prolocr- i, NATURAL. SYSTEMS MANAGEMENT Ecosystem Protection i The Upper St. Johns River Basin project provides major environmenial habitat restoranon and water quality protection benefits white maintaining flood control objectives. An increase in j productive fish and wildlife habitat will occur with the increase in functional marsh by about 11 32;300 acres in Indian River County. The project will be managed by SJRWMD. Ijhue I Cypress Lake, in the western part of the county, has been incorporated in the management plan for the Upper St. Johns River Basin Project. € Tile county includes several import,int federal and state preservation ,ureas. The Pelican t Island National Wildlife Refuge, established in 1903, +vati the first nahunal wtldliti, rctut,e in the United States. The new Archie Carr National Wildhic Kcfuge, located alone, 03 rntles of +V t DalIBIT *C" BFUCH 1993 0 p ..5WEETHEART, WHY11-11E WNL FACE? TN E 7: ;—:7-11 ovff-W V, ptiotle 5615Ei 7.17000, 215 FAX !:,o I .'/YO -Q391 Ir JAMES W. DAVIS, P.E. pUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR 1 040 25TH SIPELI vLP0 BEACH. FL. 32060 11 EXHIBIT "T:" ti DRAFT I&J"iH"iriil1004! l -T F ACTION FSD-9SEC"f ONll W'ATEet & St:DME+i Investigate the potential of strengthening existing storm-watel or fresh- Freshwater e.: Storm - water discharge management programs. lVsicr Dn Action K�ninges BACKGROUND & EXPECTED BENEFITS Through project IR -1.30244 a Ieview of SIR%VNID send Fe'r'Mff) rules affecurif, storm -water treatment was conducted and certain recommendations were made for rule revisions to increase protection for the Indian River Lagoon. A similar evaluation of the policies, rules anti regulations, ordinances or other related programs of the various agenc:les and local governments addressing storm -water or freshwater discharge management should he conducted. This evaluation should consider the recommendations found within the COMP and the IRL-SWIM Plan, neer or unproved hest management prattlers (BMPs), and pollutant load reduction goals (PLRGs) developed for the Indian River Lagoon. Following this evaluation, recommendations may be developed to Improve the effectiveness of these programs. 'T'hese recomrnencfatioils may Include the development of model policies, rules, regulations or ordinan es for adoption by these agencies or local governments. Improved storm -water management programs Wilt provide irnpro"Td protection for the resources of the Indian hive=i Lagoon. 110W 9.01 Conduct an evaluation of policies, rules, regulations, ordinances and other programs related to management of storm -water freshwa- and reshwa-ter terdischarges in the Indian River Lagoon region, 9,02 Develop recommendations for revision of policies, rules.. regulations, ordinances or other programs to provide improved management of storm -water and freshwater di ,charges t.)ctveloprnent o! model poll - cies and/or rules may he required. 9.03 Ensure implementation of revised policies, rules, regulations, ordi- nances or other programs. 9.04 Undertake regular review and update of storm -water and freshwater discharge policies, rules, regulations, ordinances or related programs. WHO Primary: FDEP Support: WMIDs DCA/FCMP (IRL-SWIM), , RRCs 86 11 �. lsl•sr (�t� baor.a 4 o id- C�j�., _. Y•ra busk I x N d (1 1 di` o b •" . M I I N a t A N g I V E A C O U N T T b T l U c BoV�c •: f1or10• a•m• sea r.••b weu. rub Commie Uen bser. 16, log? SOL4j� •Im.,.,l„� ”" INDIAN RIVER COUNTY .w. ar,cw w�.x..nu .__... aM�`:"n°.".�: FLORIDA 16.1 EXHIBIT "P" FIGURE 9.11 SURFACE WATERCLASSIFICATION IJ Q I SMELI.FISHING AREAS '�� Gross Ii waters (�' Gass III Waters Conditionally ApArovod Shalillah tiarvoslln{I Area s.b,.rleb L! MILES �. lsl•sr (�t� baor.a 4 o id- C�j�., _. Y•ra busk I x N d (1 1 di` o b •" . M I I N a t A N g I V E A C O U N T T b T l U c BoV�c •: f1or10• a•m• sea r.••b weu. rub Commie Uen bser. 16, log? SOL4j� •Im.,.,l„� ”" INDIAN RIVER COUNTY .w. ar,cw w�.x..nu .__... aM�`:"n°.".�: FLORIDA 16.1 40 I✓ rXII1111T "G" 04 Pro$$ Journal Sunday, Novernoor 14. 1999 PMP�M'a Pregs 3ournat Mia- L" Mb0- Founded in 1019 "Give light, and the people 0 scRM HOWARD will find their own way." 0 L EDITORIALS Wt ked water the topography r iiiiis have lowered the also JocNiCt help thin ot'lire stats; is N Recelat , DjV', wold, "flat 1% .1 table I,q) mid III.It Indiall River's Water qualiLy, alld drll,ilikflil;,�' Nyslvins for tab,00zed areas. espet:lally there's not much to premit it. older kJCVVk4pm0ot, dwilp fic"ll rainwater into the Shed a tear -- particularly an extra -salty olle .-- %vatetwity,. that feed Into the Indian Rivet or the for the Indian River, as a recent report indicates rivet itself', that the river's water quality is at a 10 -year low Even with modern drainage iyslenvs and teguh- Salinity levels in some portions of' the river have tions. Aclut QQ percent or rurion, now% stmt flit ;,,it) fallen dangerously, mostly because of rainfall front area canals and the Indian River, Wv said "That's hurricanes Floyd and Irene, according to the te- probably the key problem we have at this point port, produced by the Marine Resources Council of Last Florida. Low salinity stresses and even can kill The situation, however, may not be all so grim many kinds of wildlife and foliage in the river, in the )oil# term. Day s,iikl sca grussts in the "ver which is one of the most diverse hubitaii in the hityk: been doing very well cumpjred to years post. world. indicating file water -quality problem may only be Depressingly, there wasn't much anyone could tempormy, have done to prevent it. In other NNo4d", %kIIolCzIjl;: changes to i;ur;CM el' - you get storms of that inagnilkit'VI '111 jollki Jilld lelitlijitiollN on kifflinfiliC 411011ldli'll be bels are oil"" kilild Bob Day, fill Nile- om the wmdwt A [elks( not after only olic cialist with the Indian River Lagoon 11fogram. ["I" )Car III drjoluln; weather.waterof the St. John's River water Management )is- triel'*You're going to have it huge influx of fresh Drainage experts and tither tollwilik. however, Witter," should keep an eye on climate changes. A few more Rainfall for October averages about 5.5 inclics years with storms like those of' 1999, and they will in the area, but last month there wits mora than I I have to investigate flew ways to help protect the ln- inches of rain — half a foot more than normal. It than River from further freshwater damage L dD 40 rXI11BIT 11" 1990 CPN -L-81, Income and Poverty Status in 1989: 1990 Table 3. Indian River County, Florida-------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------- ------ The user should note that these data are based on a sample, subject to samplin varisbility, and that there are limitations to many of these data. Please refer to th technical documentation for Summary Tape File 3 for a further explanation of samplin variability and limitations of the data. ------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- INCOME it: 1989 Hou"holds Lose than 55,000 $5'000 to $9,999 $10,000 to $14,999 $15,000 to $24.999 525,000 to 534,999 $35,000 to $49,999 S50:()UG to $74,999 $75,000 to $99,999 $100,000 to 5149,999 $150,000 or more Median household income (dollars) Families Less than $5,000 $5,000 to $9,999 $10,000 to $14,999 $15,000 to $24,999 S25:000 to $34,999 $35,000 to 549,999 S50,000 to $74,999 $75:000 to $99,999 $100,000 to $149,999 $150,000 or more Median family income (dollars) Nonfamil.households Lass than 55,000 $5,000 to $9,999 $10,000 to $14,999 $15,000 to $24,999 $25:000 to $34,999 $35,000 to $49,999 $50,000 to $74,999 S75,000 to $99,999 $100,000 to $149,999 $150,000 or more Median nonfaixily household income (dollars) Per capita income (dollars) INCOME TYPE IN 1989 Households With wage and salary income Meanwage and salary income (dollars) With nonfarm self-employment income Mean nonfarm self-employment income (dollars) With farm self-employment income Mean farm self-employment income (dollars) With Social Security Mean Social Security income (dollars) J With public assistance income Public Mean assistance income me (dollars) With retirement income Moan retirement income (dollars) POVERTY STATUS IN 1989 36,115 All persons for whom Poverty 1,83.5 status is determined 88,56 7,74 3,009 Below poverty level 3,579 7,803 Persons 18 years and over 71,76 6,579 below poverty level 5,66 6,589 Persons 65years and over 24.11 1,85 4,952 Below Poverty level 1,461 I,078 Related children under 18 years 16.64 1,150 below poverty level 1,95 28,()61 Related children tinder 5 years 4,69 below poverty level 65 27,2116 Related children 5 to 17 years 11,95 604 Below poverty level 1,30 1,144 1:992 Unrelated individuals 14.22 5,462 below poverty level 2,92 4,999 5,539 All families 27,28 4,301 below poverty level 1.60 1,232 With related children tinder 962 1,051 18 nars 1 alow poverty,level 9,30, 96 33:569 With related children tinder 5 years 3,67' 10,829 Below poverty level 46! 1,263 1,913 Female householder families 2,81 1,658 Below poverty level 57. 2:506 With related children under 1,472 18 1.74, 1:017 nars Below poverty level 47, 620 With related children kinder 160 III 5 years Below poverty level 571 27; 69 Percent below poverty level; 16,920 ---------------------------- 7 C2�5 All persons Persons 18 years and over 7.S Persons 65 years and over 7.'. 38,115 Related children under 18 years ll.*. 23,297 Related children under 5 years 13.S Related children 5 to 17 years 10.S 33,902 Unrelated individuals 20.t 4,436 All families 5,5 20,818 With related children under 423 18 yedfs 10.1 With related children under 20,921 5 years 13.: 17,7513 Female householder families 20.4 9,038 With related children under 1,433 18 years 27.2 With related children under 14,509 5 years 47.0 10,600 13,219 rRCM:U= LIBRARIES r0; x? 770 5255 JAN 12, 1993 4;A2PI :.29 EXHIBIT "11" 1990 ConaUa Of PopUIMI On and FsMaitIO 040 Florida 650 Indian Rivor Cotint:y TNCOMN IN 13£34 Kouueholdu........................................................ 38,115 £- LOOD than $5,000 .................................................... 1,035 $5,000 tD $9,999 . ........................................4....- - 3,009 $10,0100 to .................. .....-............. .1,579 $15,000 to $24,999.1 .... I .................... I ................... ... 7,683 $25,000 to $.34,993 ............ ....................... I.............. 6,579 $35,000 to $49,999 ...........................1......111............. 6,563 $50,000 to $74,999 .................................................. 1,052 $75,000 to $99,999 .................................................. 1,461 *100,000 to $149,999 ................................................ 1,070 $1.50,000 or Inoro..... ...................................... 1,150 Medina houtiubv Id.a I2ivu1S a (Giollarb) .......... 1 ........... 11 , 1 .......... 20,961 F amiliou.. ...........111......... 0.... 4 ...................... 27,206 ♦�^s Lone than ... ... ... .. Y .. ..... ....... s . .. ... .... .. ...... i 604 $5!000 to $9,999 ................ ................... 11 ... ......... ,.. 1,144 $10,000 to $14,999 .................................................. 1,992 $15,000 to $24,999 .................................................. 5,462 $25,000 to $34,999 .................................................. 4,999 $35,000 to $49,999 .................................................. 51539 $50,000 to $74,999.1 ..... I ................. ....... I ....... 4,301 $75,000 to $99,999 . ...............................................f 1,232 $100,000 to $143,399..................................0 ............. 962 $150,000 or moral.... .. ............a ........................ 1.,0.51 Nudiun family income(dollaru)................................... ,.. 53,569 Nonf.amily houvolluldr.............................................. 10,029 iLusfsthan 00/0�...........................................1 .....111 $5,000 1., 263 g. Y(5�, $5,000 to $9,99 ✓ .................................................... 1,913 $10,000 to $14,999............ ....................................... 1,658 $15,000 to 524,959...,..4 ....................................4.1.... 2,506 $25,000 to $34,959 ...................................4............1. 1,472 �M,000 to $49,'333 .................................................. 1,017 $50,000 to $74,999...- .............................. ...... 620 $75,000 to $99,999 . .................................I............• 10307 $100,000 to $149,999.. .........................................4..1. ill $150,000 or worn. .. ..................................... 019 Median nonfaitily houoohold incowo (dollar€s)........ .... 16,920 Per cnpita incomes (dollars) ...... ..................I............... i 17,825 L3 ;:RCM:U'; ^IoRweIsy ru` Qn nm snss JAN 12. 1993 4.42Pl ;,.mu onxznzT ^x~ �- 1900 counu* of poc^`lxmnn and xouoinV [ n^n^ � OAO Florida 050 zmuinv ai,"r Comity / zocown zm z000 ' Kousoholdu..~.,^.,^.,.^.^~~,^^^^'''`'^`^`''`'''^^'^`'''^^`^''^''^` 1 8�5 Loun than $5,000.1... ,-....-.~,...,..'........^.,...',.,'.^^^^^..^^^ ! , 3 OO9 � $5 OUO �o �y,AV9.^^.,.,...,.^^°^,'^''''^''`..^.,'^^^^`'~``^°^^`^^'`^ ' / � 5Y9 $10,000 to Gz4,gno.,,..^^''''^~^``^'''`'^`~`'^`-''~~~^'''~^^^^^`'''^ l~*OJ $15,000 to $24/g9B,'````.````''^^^^'^^~^'-`'``^^^~^^'``'^^°°~^^,^"^^ , $25,000 to Va*,oyn,...,.....,,,^^.,'^~.,^^,^^,,~,,,.,,._,,~,,,,^,,,^ a"�r� , � 58; $35,000 to $0,999....^^`^^'~`^^`^-^^~^,,'~^`~`°~"^^`"^°^^^^^^^~^^~^ x'�s� $50,000 to $r4/yoo....................... ,~,^.^^.^.^..^°~^^°°,.^.... , 4�� 1,461 $75,000 to $99^999,,.,...^,..,`.°^°.^,'`^^^`^^^^^^'^^^'"^^"^^,^"°^^~ ato *14�.9g9..,......^`^,~~....,.^.^^~...^~^^,"^.~,°,^^.,°.~ , zura�nn,ouo S150,000 or worn .............................. ^~,^,,,..,,,,,,,,,,,,~ 1�O 1,150 nuuinn xonwvh*ld luv*m(un��mzu)^.^^°.^..^....,.~.^.^'°~^,^.~`^°,^` �v9s1w / xami]lmo............. ,^^`..~.°.,,.,,,^,°°° tot ,,,,^,,,^°,"......... wnn 27,206 604 Lmao than g5,V00... /.......... ,^~.~°°°^^^,^~°^^"^"°^°^^^~^-°^^^~`°^~ u-'ouo to yy,00u.................................... ,............... �' 144 1,992 $^`'`~Uto S14,999 .......^.^..,..-.^,..,.~..^~.,~,.,,.,..^.^^.^~.., 5,462 «ou S15,000 to xo,nyn.... .... .......... .,^.°.,.^°^.^^.`^°^`^,^°°"^°~'^` ,ouo to $34,999^^'`^..~^`^^-`^''``'''^`^~'``~°^^^^~^^-'^`^^^^''`- *' 9 90 35,000 to $49,999.1 ...... ^^.^^,,'..~...^..^.,,..,,~~°^^^.~.,~° 5,539 50'000 to .....,.,..,...^'`.^^^, 4/301 cuz � 75,080 to b99/nRg..'...,.....,...'^,~.,^^,..^.^."°^^,.~-`,,^~°.^^^~ , . $100/000 to $149,090.,....,..,.,.,,.....,..,.,^^..~~,.°^.^^,..^°.... 962 150/000 or mozm.............. ................................ .~,,.° 1,051 -Median fwnily 1noome (dollucu) ............ .... ."^^..^^^°°^",,^~^,.,. 33.569 omi obnz�m ......,.,.~......^......,,,..^...^.^...,... �o,00y �� uoa umoo than b6,00n........... ........... ^....... ^^,,~,,,,,,,,,.,,_.,^, 1,263 5,00$ to *9,9V9,,..........,....^,.~..`^^`.^.....°^°^^.......,..,.. 1,913 10,800 to $l4,99V........................ .... ^......... .^^.......... 1,656 $15,000 to $24,999 ..................................................2,506 925,$00 to SJA,n90............. .,^.,...... ^^.°~,^.°~^^"............. 1/472 �35,000 to SA9,999........................... ,......... °............ . 1,017 $50/000 to $74,g9g.......... ,.,....^^^^.^^^^...,................... ~ 620 $75,000 to tgp,$90...................... ............................ 180 »100,000 to $z4o,9oo..................... ..,........................ Ill Vzso,uon or mnzo................................................ .... 09 Per capita inonwa <dullarw>..........,..,..,,...,,...^.........~.^.. 17,825 -~' W0 L] ~ ' Fxn�orr "T" |� | i ' | /" '/* "/ T/� /� ,�, �^7, �V r/'7Y] x��/7/ /� �/ ^ . ' ' mxx 2om0oXmxo Y&Vn88AC8. FLORIDA 32v6/'/x89 7a;m""rmx//o7x-4710^n^,'m6//778o856 , CITY u^w^oen/ vnunEsn1FInoroo |/ . . ' December 1.1A80 Nk Yaping Wang St. Johns River Water Management District g!fice of Policy and Planning P.O. 1429 Palatka, FL 321781429 RE: Indian River County k8usterGtormwmter Mvni8nmonxP|nn Funding Grant Application Dear Mr, Wang: This Is toadvise the City ofVero Beach's staff does support the referenced project. Since the Indian River Lagoon has been designated as surface water cfcritical state concern and considering the regional nature of the project, the &(uno NPDES requirements and other issues specified in the Indian River County Grant Application, wefeel the results ofthe Study will benefit the entire community. We are requesting the Governing DouvJ give the Application every consideration and approve the Grant eorequested. G|noeroh' ' `^ City Manager/Utilities Director RT/srp .. mz JKnOhand��Onu�� County Administrator, Cu /\knV� Davis, P.E, Director, Pob|�VYo�o. Indian River County *" . ^. | K'� y � uxorVzr "J" 1989/2000APPROVED BUDGET AS[)F12DY39 OPTIONAL SALES TAX FUND 315 APPROVED INCREASE 1998199 1999/2000 EAS� 315-000334-07700 FlN.D.GRANT *0 $V $0 315-000-312-00,00 OPTIONAL SALES TAX $9,053J80 g10,406.483 $1.352.72/ 315'000'361-010.00 INTEREST- INVESTMENTS $575.793 9575,000 ($793) 315'000-38$'030.$8 LESS 5% EST|NIATEORECBPT ($472.688) ($549.075) ($76.387) IRC JAIL ' PLUMBING CONTROL RETROFIT *70.008 SHERIFF CRIME SCENE UNIT EXPANSION $250.000 G|FFORDA0UAT|CCENTER G600.000 NORTH COUNTY RECREATION COMPLEX $2.450.000 LAND FOR MULTIPURPOSE FIELDS $50¢000 315 -XX -XX -066.51 PROJECTS 1999/2000 $22,450,510 $14,361,459 ($8,089,051)TOTAL EXPENSES 2& 0 10 9FIRE STATION uADDITION $390/50 FIRE STATION 11 $1,465.770 FIBER OPTIC NETWORK EXPANSION $175,000 S��Do. CLOSED LANDFILLS GROUNDWATER TESTING $250.000 IRC MAIN LIBRARY ADDITIONS $850.52/ NORTH COUNTY LIBRARY ADDITIONS $1.037.562 IRC JAIL ` DETENTION ELECT. RETROFIT $500.000 IRC JAIL ' PLUMBING CONTROL RETROFIT *70.008 SHERIFF CRIME SCENE UNIT EXPANSION $250.000 G|FFORDA0UAT|CCENTER G600.000 NORTH COUNTY RECREATION COMPLEX $2.450.000 LAND FOR MULTIPURPOSE FIELDS $50¢000 10THST. BRIDGE ' LATERAL xCANAL $500.000 nmTHAVEJ5TH ST. SWI OLD DIXIE 'ROW $300.000 ROAD & BRIDGE/ FLEET MGT. COMPLEX *558'000 4TH ST. &U.G. 1INTERSECTION IMPROV. $580.000 COUNTY ARTERIAL STREET LIGHTING $30.000 OVERALL SIDEWALKS AND D|xEp^JnoPnOG. $100.008 aTonwvvxTsm|Mpn0vsmswTS $1.034.147 BEACH RESTORATION PROJECT $1.508.000 F|mxwc|xL SOFTWARE PACKAGE $750,000 WINTER BEACH CEMETERY $100.000 SEBASTIAN CITY PARK LAND $200.000 CASH FORWARD ' SEPT. 3O $78.303 RESERVE FOR CONTINGENCIES O�\budget\jason\tr,inspor\stormwater budget. 123 12/7/9S