The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About01/30/2024� -7WAW-7, Jaimaty 30, 2M Ipm to Spm Loution', Fellsmere Old School Auditorium 22 South Orange Street Fellsmere, FL 32948 AGENDA 1. Call to Order & Introduction a. Board of County Commissioners b. City Concd c. Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council 2. Pledge of Allegiance 3. Expectations for Today (TCRIPC) 4. Utilities a. grief Ove"iew - IRC Utilities update (Sean Lieske) b. East of 1-9S/ Corrigan Ranch c. West of I-/TropicalVillage Estate S. Stormwater a. FWCD Maintenance 6. Transportation a. CR512 Cross -Sections and Access Management (Consultant Presentation) b. Myrtle (CR507) Broadway and Other Road Transfers c, Fellsmere Development and Use of Transportation impact Fees 7. Closing Comments/ Next Steps S. Adjournment Anyone who needs a special accommodation for this meeting may contact the County's Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Coordinator at (772) 226-1223 at least 48 hours in advance of meeting. Anyone who needs special accoiniTKAation with a hearing aid for this meeting may contact the Board of'County Commission Off iat 772-226-1490 at least 20 hours in advance ofthe nweting. VVtke, ./ C?fe, PLEASE SIGN IN BELOW x /I 5�) " -�e-y �1�1O`r ER CSG p� t ?fit 71 �'LpRIOi NAME PHONE EMAIL r a0 c+ 1 nj-� ko F i vel, 2Z - 27 Ll (olv4JA ( I cecA �� aJq-6:I ess�ccs�� 1P9 ±t� 1 7� 7/3 _�7 2 Z (g - J 10 pi -e e44A Cv Q ;... ►.r ��-1 Sojj-� F t Sl�u Lee-, �, 6 lr a �v 'v .11 SCS L►e?�' GYA1S I'v694 Claudo M arade Nrc,v 51�j� V Tc r� 7'rA2L:�-- w-cuA PLEASE SIGN IN BELOW /�,2Lf PHONE ( EMAIL I 772 Qi � l �ws✓PclL��/rfisl'£/''T�PrI'Ye-_-' recfor_,6-c—oE y-0.3 t-7 q13 -53o- iL45'� OFCS%cvc- a- GMA+L.Corl NAME ve?: 6�, ~ - / PLEASE SIGN IN BELOW x,.30- �2'� VE G J � �LORVD ' PHONE EMAIL 771-1 (t&- 63oI P�' yCIP�/cC��i�ya� /i��►e,.r•a5 ?72_- (o kG-<v3%(o Wd.. j�yWjjeAr ang �7Q - 3 - bale '`72 63 ZZ �titiw„ Q ��I•�k-11s `7 Z2 C M2 nld rr ;ve✓ STUDY ADVISORY TEAM T R E A S U R E C*1010ASsIhAREGIONAL PLANNING FDOT D4 Project Manager: Kent Walia 4: tJ."dAtA. Rlv&,�L C0441441,t Consultant Team: Kittelson & Associates, Inc. STUDY PROCESS • Data assessment and existing conditions • Stakeholder interviews • SAT Meeting #1 • Understand the future multimodal needs of the corridor, including future traffic projections a Az Senior Resource ASSOCIATION • Develop and revise draft alternatives based on SAT Input • Evaluate and compare the performance of alternatives • SAT Meetings #2 and #3 CR 512 NEEDS Mobility Access 1 Character Safety Resilience of Fellsmere and Sustainability State P.); k 11011T1a LARGUIRA AVE Pr■N!1_ YVAN_A AWN r ■ ■ Transitioning/Rural Suburban Small City Rural _J r)J J I 1 —1 r) Y I U —T IJ J II � r I— r I_T JsJsS�Js`, J ��J) �J J �'-1 J Provide travel Provide multimodal Preserve the small - options for people access, town character of walking and Fellsmere. biking along and Serve existing and across CR 512. future local speeds, Provide businesses. Provide safe travel Minimize new options for people impervious areas. walking and biking Provide mobility along CR 512; that emphasizes the Maintain safe travel use of non -auto speeds, Provide modes. lighting. Match the Number of Maintain 25 MPH Vehicular Travel Lanes Target Speed with Needs (2 Lanes) *Target Speed is defined by FDOT as "the highest speed at which vehicles should operate on a thoroughfare in a specific context, consistent with the level of $ multi -modal activity generated by adjacent land uses, to provide both mobility for motor vehicles and a supportive environment for pedestrians, bicyclists, and public transit users" and is a concept that is common in the transportation industry". *Alternative fits within 100' of assumed existing ROW in Small City. This assumes stormwater will be stored off-site. Alternative 1 - Buffered Bicycle Lane, Center Turn Lane with Spot Medians � r oeyyb -45 -- - _ _ y ki 4% 8 i 5- 8, 1 „' Alternative 2 - Boulevard with Sharrov x k: ri Two -Lane Through Lane MT Mai ti• `- .A3p r f/ *Alternative fits within 100' of assumed existing ROW in Small City. This assumes stormwater will be stored offsite. Match the Number of Vehicular Travel Lanes with Needs ( 2 Lanes) Key: How Well Do the Alternatives Meet the Needs: 0 = Meets the Need Well 4 = Moderately Meets the Need 11 O = Does Not Meet the Need Provide Provide multimodal Maintain Provide safe travel multimodal access to properties multimodal access options for people travel options for along CR 512. to properties along walking and biking people travelling CR 512. along CR 512; along and across Serve existing and Maintain safe travel CR 512. future local speeds, Provide businesses. lighting. Minimize new impervious areas Provide mobilityMaintain 35 MPH Match the Number of that emphasizes the Target Speed Vehicular Travel Lanes use of non -auto I with Needs (4 Lanes) modes. 12 Alternative 1 - Maintains Northern Frontage Road and Median *Alternative fits within 150' of assumed existing ROW + 50' existing frontage road (150'total) in Suburban District. This assumes stormwater will be stored off-site. 20' I 1 5' 1 11' 11' m Alternative 2 — Greensnace on Both Sides and Median it *Alternative fits within 150' of assumed existing ROW + 50' existing frontage road (150'total) in Suburban District. This assumes stormwater will be stored off-site. 11' M 5' 'Alternative fits within 150' of assumed existing ROW + 50' existing frontage road (150'total) in Suburban District. This assumes stormwater will be stored off-site. 5 11' 10' 11 11 10' 11' ( 5 Provide Provide multimodal Maintain Provide safe travel Minimize new multimodal access to properties multimodal options for people impervious areas. travel options for along CR 512. access to walking and Provide mobility Match the Number of people travelling properties along biking along CR that emphasizes the Maintain 35 MPH Vehicular Travel Lanes along and across CR 512. 512; Maintain safe use of non -auto Target Speed with Needs (4 Lanes) CR 512. Serve existing and travel speeds, modes. future local Provide lighting. businesses. O O O O O O O (Excess Lanes) Key: How Well Do the Alternatives Meet the Needs: • = Meets the Need well 4 = Moderately Meets the Need Iv 0 = Does Not Meet the Need Provide Provide multimodal Maintain Provide safe travel Minimize new multimodal access to properties multimodal access options for people impervious areas. travel options for along CR 512. to properties along walking and biking Provide mobility Maintain 45 MPH Match the Number of people travelling CR 512. along CR 512; that emphasizes the Target Speed Vehicular Travel Lanes along and across Serve existing and Maintain safe travel use of non -auto with Needs (4 Lanes) CR 512. future local speeds modes. businesses. 17 *Alternative does not fit within 60' of assumed existing ROW in Rural District 68' of additional ROW is needed. This assumes that stormwater will be stored off-site. Alternative 1 - Buffered Bicycle Lane Adjacent to Roadway z� AW M 5' 11' 11' 22' 11' 4 I Alternative 2 - Buffered, BigycleaLane Adjacent to Sidewalk *Alternative does not fit within 60' of assumed existing ROW in Rural District 68' of additional ROW is needed. This assumes that stormwater will be stored off-site. r. M 22' Provide safe travel Minimize new Provide Provide multimodal Maintain multimodal access to properties multimodal options for people impervious areas. travel options for along CR 512. access to walking and Provide mobility Match the Number of &10 biking along CR that emphasizes the Maintain 45 MPH Vehicular Travel Lanes along and across CR 512. .' use of non -auto Target Speed law CR 512. Serve existing and travel speeds modes. future local Provide lighting. businesses. *Alternative does not fit within 60' of assumed existing ROW in Rural District 68' of additional ROW is needed. This assumes that stormwater will be stored off-site. r. M 22' Key: How Well Do the Alternatives Meet the Needs: • = Meets the Need Well = Moderately Meets the Need 20 O = Does Not Meet the Need Note: FDOT has a project along CR 572 east of l-95 with an auxiliary lane and bike lane reconfiguration. Both alternatives would need to be transitioned to the future configuration under l-95. Provide safe travel Minimize new Provide Provide multimodal Maintain multimodal access to properties multimodal options for people impervious areas. travel options for along CR 512. access to walking and Provide mobility Match the Number of people travelling properties along biking along CR that emphasizes the Maintain 45 MPH Vehicular Travel Lanes along and across CR 512. 512; Maintain safe use of non -auto Target Speed with Needs (4 Lanes) CR 512. Serve existing and travel speeds modes. future local Provide lighting. businesses. O O O O O • • 1 1 • 1 • i 4s�i� 'I A Key: How Well Do the Alternatives Meet the Needs: • = Meets the Need Well = Moderately Meets the Need 20 O = Does Not Meet the Need Note: FDOT has a project along CR 572 east of l-95 with an auxiliary lane and bike lane reconfiguration. Both alternatives would need to be transitioned to the future configuration under l-95. J� J-�'��).�� '-�J �� J Why Transitions Are Important • Safe roadways are designed to reinforce the intended operating speed. • Transitions tell the driver that there is something different about the place they are entering and to behave differently. TRADITIONAL FOUR-WAY INTERSECTION *E3 VMiclo-ltrVehlcle C-00 Points yy(( 24 Vehicle :o.Pedestriz Conflict Points SINGLE -LANE NOD ERN ROUNDABOUT 5Y. b Ven2cle-to-Vehicle 'le C-hict Point, *a Venz.l:-to-Pedestrian 7 cwgkt Points 'Jt 10 10 24 fewer ways for a car to crash 16 fewer ways for a bike/ped to crash ■ ■ Transitioning/Rural Suburban Signalized Intersection Small City Rural ■ ■ Suburban Q Modern Roundabout -t North • Potential full access points were also determined for each alternative Next Steps • Next Steps for this Study • Study Document (Needs, Alternatives, Tradeoffs) • Draft Document — February 2024 • Draft Document Reviewed by MPO & SAT — March 2024 • Final Study Document Study — March 2024 ALTERNATIVE 7 ALTERNATIVE t & 2 'D ALTERNATIVE 1 & 2- ALTERNATIVE t & 2 " - .. CA 512 d^'� CorriEor Next Steps • Next Steps for this Study • Study Document (Needs, Alternatives, Tradeoffs) • Draft Document — February 2024 • Draft Document Reviewed by MPO & SAT — March 2024 • Final Study Document Study — March 2024 s I*@ I e Is *;o -p@ eIIeM•;ua� ZS9,�'LLL'bS6 137a4s7Q - uo.Ijn4aodsunal Jo �uaua�aodap npi,107d aos.in.radnS 5u.?uunld `�c, LLI LLL L- L 1 I -- Yrr Four County Commission Meeting Friday, October 27 Indian River State College Locations of Septic T in Indian River Cou Florida iFf S�-.- dr.Rlk' F , - FEW �- O ` � mw i0606-74�!VNM der• ,, .. 1 Hnui5p Bill 1379 (:zn2-:-Po. Key Highlights: Prohibits new Onsight Sewage Treatment & Disposal Systems (OSTDS) within a Basin Management Action Plan (BMAP), Indian River Lagoon (IRL) Protection Program. On lots one acre or less where sewer is not available, new OSTDSs must be an enhanced nL reducing OSTDS beginning January 1, 2024 (unless previously permitted) Any commercial or residential property with an existing OSTDS located within the IRL ProtE Program area are required to connect to central sewer or upgrade to an enhanced nutrient reducing OSTDS by July 1, 2030. Other Information: Conventional OSTDS Cost: $6,000 - $7,000 Enhanced Nutrient Reducing OSTDS: $14,000 - $15,000 (today's cost)) Requires Annual Operating Permit: $150 Requires 2 year Maintenance Agreement $1,000 - $1,200 (today's cost) Costs — Public fide Public Way Wefer Meter 1 Private Propefly t t ❖ Water Main Et Laterals (-$1.5 M/Mile ) ❖Sewer Main - Gravity (-$1 M/Mile ) ❖Sewer Main - Force /Pressure (-$1.5 M/Mile ) ❖Lift Station ($350,000 - $500,000) ppw�''7 ■ - W:r)wr Lctter,al - a. SLC Watcr. N ow W ter R p—if ility: F m Iha Water Main to the Water Mater A.yth g aite ttt W.I— M ter I. the Homo CS ewer: Homeowner Sealer Reaponalbll1t 1' Sewer Main The Sewer Wye/Co nn ectl on A the Sewer Lateral aftor the Sewer Ma{n to ttte Home ❖ Water Main Et Laterals (-$1.5 M/Mile ) ❖Sewer Main - Gravity (-$1 M/Mile ) ❖Sewer Main - Force /Pressure (-$1.5 M/Mile ) ❖Lift Station ($350,000 - $500,000) ppw�''7 Assessments (pursuant to 1995 City and IRC ILA) Can be financed over 10+ years (possibly 15 or 20) Through the tax roll Covers public -side infrastructure This would be in addition to private -side costs ➢ Grant Opportunities St Johns River Water Management District Florida Department of Environmental Protection Indian River Lagoon National Estuary Program Federal Grants t A Public Way PrhWe Properly ^; t t t t t t _ t Water Meter � `-..... _ Wafer Alam i� _ Water L terol . SLC Watcr Homeowner Water Responsibility: From the Water Maln to the Water Meter Anything atter the Water Meter to the Home Sewer Alam--Sev✓er Wye/Connedror:-5'eever l.ater7t- SLC Sewer: Homeowner Sewer Responsibility: Sewer Main The Sewer Wye/Connection & the Sewer Lateral after the Sower Main to the Home Gravity Atalf slapA �1 $2,796 Sewer Impact Fee (Can be financed over 5 years) $50 Sewer Deposit (Refundable after 24 consecutive on-time payments) $26.93 New account fee $2,000 - $3,500 for gravity line $13,000 - $18,000 for private lift station Total = $5,000 - $23, 000 102 If existing with no lateral, there is also a sewer service connection fee of $2,895 2These costs don't include the cost of septic tank abandonment which could add another $800 - $1000 Funding Options: Save Our Indian River Lagoon Tax — Private Stakeholder Driven Optional Sales Tax (Limited and competing with other critical capital projects/needs... already programmed 5 years out) Impact Fees — generally never pay for the full cost SHIP Funding Must meet eligibility requirements based on annual income Lien against the home (may be forgivable) Impact Fee — ineligible cost Would be based on eligibility requirements Others ???? Competition with new development Routine Maintenance of Existing Infrastructure No Sewer Services Without Water Service Capacity availability at Wastewater Treatment Facility( Questions /Discus