HomeMy WebLinkAbout2000-337Fi
4w
40
State of Florida
�r337�i
Hazard Mitigation Grant Program Application
for
Shelter Retrofit Projects
Department of Community Affairs
Division of Emergency Management
Bureau of Recovery & Mi'tiga'tion
(850) 410-3159
C_3
40
STATE OF FLORIDA
HAZARD MITIGA'T'ION GRANT PROGRAM (HMGP)
FLOOD MITIGATION ASSISTANCE+" (FMA)
Application
ONE'
F[kIA- -DR-FL 0 Standard HMGP ❑ 5% Initiative Application ❑ Application Complete
0 Standard FMA O Initial Submission or ❑ Resubmission
Support Documents Eligible Applicant Project Typo(s)
O Conforms with State 409 Plan O State or Local Government O Wind
d In declared Area O Private Nan-Protil {Tax ID Received) O Flood
❑ Statewide ORecognized Indian Tribe or Tribal organization O Other
Community NFIP Status: (cn— alftxaowrr
O Participating Community ID M. Reviewer Phone #
O In Good Standing 0 Non -Participating O CRS Reviewer Fax #
State Application ID Reviewer Email:
State Reviewer Date Application Received
Date: _ .
This application is for all Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA Region Iv) Flazard Mitigation Grant Program (HMGP)
and Flood Mitigation Assistance (F -MA) proposals. Please complete ALL sections and provide the documents requested. If you
require technical assistance with this application. please contact your State Emergency Management Division at (850) 922-5289.
Page 2 of 15
•
i
D—M A. To Fill Out This Applicatlon: complete all sections which correspond with the type of proposed project
Gen oral Application Sections:
pp. 1-6: All Applicants must complete these sections
Environmental Review:
pp. 7-10: Ali Applicants must complete these sections
Main lenanceAgreemenf:
p. 11: Anyapplications involving public property, public ownership, or management
of property
Acquisitfon Worksheet:
pp.12-14: AcgWsitlon Projects only -- one worksheet per structure
Elevation Werksheet.
pp,15.19: Elevation Projects only-- one worksheet per structure
Drainage Worksheot:
p. 20: Drainage Projects only
Wind Retrofit Worksheet:
pp. 21-22: Wind reirokt projects only (HMGP only) -- one worksheet per structure
Attachment A.,
FEMA farm 9049 (Request for Public Assistance): All Applicants must complete,
if applicable.
Attachment B:
HMGPCFMAApplication Completeness Checklist: All applicants are recommended
to complete this checklist
B, Applicant tnformation
FEMA-i3QQ-DRFL Dlsmter name: Hurricarrc Fla.1
Title/ Brief Descriptive Project Summary: Shelter retrofits to increase the county's shelter capacity,
1.Applicant (Organization): Indian River County Department of Emergency Services
2. Applicant Type: N State or Local Government ❑ Recognized Native American Tribe ❑ Private Non -Profit
3. County: Indian River
4. Slate Legislative di;strict(s):. 80 Congressional District(s): 15
5. Federal Tax I.D. Number: 59-6000674
6. FIPS Code: 061-9906100
7. National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) Community identification Number (this number can be obtained from the
FIRM map for your area): 120119
8. NFIP Community Rating System Class Number: 7
9. Attach proof of current Flood Insurance Policy (FMA only). Flood Insurance Policy Number'. NCA
% Paint of Contact
OMs. VMr. DMrs. First flame: Nathan Last Name: McCallum
Title: Emergency Management Coordinator
Street Address: 1840 26"' Street
City: Vero Beach State: Florida Zip Code: 32960
Telephone: (561) 567-8000, Ext. 289 Fax: (561) 770-5017
Email Address (if available): ircesnaticsunet- net
11. Application Prepared by:
oMs. OMr, QMrs. First Name: Nathan Last Name: McCollum
Title: Emergency Management Coordinator
Tetephone: 561 567.8000 Ext. 289 Fax: 561 770-5417
12, Authorized Applicant Agent (proof of authorization authority required)
oMs. OMr. []Mrs. First Name: Douglas Last Name: Wright
Title, Director Telephone: _ (561) 567-8000, Exl. 2251 Fax: (561) 770-5017
Street Address: _ 1840 261h Street
City: Vero Be ch State: Florida Zip Code: 3296D
Signature Date
13. All proposed projects should be included in the county's Local Mitigation Strategy (LMS), please attach a letter of
endorsement for the project from the county's Local Mitigation Strategy Coordinator. (See endorsement attached).
Page 3 of 15
•
•
section I. History of Hazards I Damages in the Area to be Protected
A. Overview of Past Damages
Describe a9past damages from hazardous events in the projectarea (include name of storm, if applicable), including
direct and indirect costs. Include Presidentially declared disasters as well as events that did not result In a Presidential
declaration. Attach any supporting documents. Direct costs should Include damages to structures and Infrastructure
In the project area as a result of the hazard. Indirect costs should include the cost to the local government to respond
to victims of the hazard in the project area, any interruption to local businesses, and losses of public services (3
examples are provided for your reference).
Date Frequency of Event Damages M Indirect costs (describe)
9/13199 Hurricane Floyd $950,000 in county damage $69,000 for evacuations and emergency preparations
(10 year event)
tortar" Hurricane Irene $250,000 in county damage -0-
(5-year event)
Section 17. Project Description
A. Hazards to be Mitigated 1 Level of Protection
1. Select the type of hazards the proposed project will mitigate:
U Flood ® Wind D Storm surge ❑ Other (list)
2. Identify the type of proposed project:
0 Elevation and retrofitting of residential or non-residential structure
13 Acquisition and relocation C Acquisition and demolition
Ell Wind retrofit 0 Minor drainage project that reduces localized flooding
0 Other (please explain)
3. List the total number of persons that will he protected by the proposed project: 5,000
k Fill in the level of protection and the magnitude of event the proposed project will mitigate.
(e.g. 23 structures protected against the 100 -year ([%) flood)
__structures protected against the -year Flood (10, 25.50. too, or 50o year)
I structures protected against 145 mile per hour (mph) winds
5. Engineered projects only (e.g. Drainage [tnproventenis), include (attach to this page) ALL engineering
calculations and design plans used to determine the above level of protection.
6. Project will provide protection against the hazard(s) above far 50 years (i.e., what is the useful life of the
project).
Page 4 of 15
C>
40
! B. Project Description, Scope 0f Work, and Protection Provided
[Describe, in detail, the existing problem, the proposed project, and the scope of work. rxplain how the proposed
project will solve the problem(s) and provide the levels) of protection described in Part A. Please attach a vendor's
estimate andlor a contractor's bid for the scope of work.
The county is currently experiencing a severe deficit of safe shelter spaces for our residents seeking shelter
from hurricane events. The safe shelter spaces that currently exist only provide protection for wind speeds of
up to 60 m.p.h. Retrofitting existing public shelters with a hardened window protection will reduce that
shelter deficit and provide a safe haven for our evacuees for wind events of up to 145 m.p.h.
Section III. project Location (Fully describe the location of the proposed project.)
A. Site
1. Describe the physical location of this project, including street numbers (or neighborhoods) and zip codes; and if
available, please provide precise longitude and latitude coordinates for the site utilizing a hand-held global
positioning system (GPS) unit or Ute equivalent.
0 Glendale Elementary School
4940 r Street.
Vero Beach, FL.
27° 39'0611/080' 26' l3"
1 Is the project site seaward of the Coastal Co
nstntetion Control Line (CCCL}? 13 YES NQ
3. Provide the number of each structure type (listed below) in the project area that will be affected by the project.
That is, all strrtctures in project area.
residential properly busincsses 1 commercial property
public buildings X schools 1 hospitals t houses of worship
other
B. Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) showing project Site
0 Attach a copy of the FIRM map, a copy of the panel information from the FIRM, and, if available, the
Floodway Map. FIRM Wraps are required for tlrls application (lf published foryour area), also, all artached
maps nrust have fire project site and structures clearly nrarked a+r the map. FIRMS are typically available
from your local floodplain administrator who may be located in a planning, zoning, or engineering office.
Maps can also be ordered from the Map Service Center at 1-800-359-9616. For more information about
F[RMs, contact your local agencies or visit the FiRM site on the FEMA Web -page at
httn:lfwvt w.fcrna•t?avlltomcf MSCf Itardculty.htnt
Using the FIRM, determine the flood zone(s) of the project site (Check all zones in the project area).
(see FIRM legend for flood zone explanations)
[I VE or V 1-30 11 AR or A l-30
d AC m Al l ❑ A (no base flood elevation given)
* B or X (shaded) 0 C or X (unshaded)
❑ Floodway
C1 Coastal Barrier Resource Act (CBRA) Zone (Federal regulations strictly ]unit Federal funding for
projects in this Zone; please coordinate with your state agency before submitting an application for a
OBRA Zone project)
If the FIRM Map for your area is not published, please attach a copy of the Flood tla7zard Boundary Map
(F€iBM) for your area, with the project site and structures clearly marked on the map
Page 5 of 15
4
40
C. City or County Map with Project Site and Photographs
• Attach a copy of a city or county scale neap (large enough to show She entire project area) with the project
site and structures marked on the map.
• Attach a USGS 1:24,OOD toga map with project site clearly marked on the map.
• For acquisition or elevation projects, include copy of Parcel Map (Tax Map, Property identification Map,
etc.) showing each property to be acquired. The map should include the Tax ID numbers for each parcel, if
possible.
• Attach photographs (2 copies each) far each project site. The photographs should be representative of the
project area, including any relevant streams, creeks, rivers, etc. and drainage areas which affect the project site
or will be affected by the project.
Section IV. Budget/Costs
in this section, provide details of all the estimated costs of the project. As this information is used for the Benefit -Cost Analysis,
reasonable cost estimates are essential. Since project administrative costs are calculated on a sliding scale, do not include them in the
budget. Also, do not include contingency costs in the budget.
A. Materials
am Dimension uaz it Cost per Unit Cost
SEE BELOW
B. labor (Include equipment costs -- please indicate all "soft" or in -hind matches)
Description Hours Rate Cost
SEE BELOW
C. fees Paid Include any other costs associated with the project.
Desert tion of Task Hours Bate Cost
N/A
Total 'Estimated Project Cost $84,206*
*The estimated cost of this project includes all labor and materials based on an estimate provided by a
professional and licensed pr9ject contractor. Estimates were not detailed with materials and labor, as is
customary with projects ot'this type.
Page 6 of 15
f
40
1), Funding Sources (round figures to the nearest dollar)
The maximum FEMA share for fIMGPI MA projeers is 75%. t lie other 25% can be made up of State and Local funds as well as in-
kind services. Moreover, the FMA program requires that the maximum in-kind match be no more than 12.5% of the total project costs.
liMGpIFMA funds may be packaged with other Federal funds, but other Federal funds (except for Federal funds which lose their
Federal identity at the State level —such as CDBG, ARS, I10MR) may not be used for the State or local match.
Estimated FEMA Share$ t++3 l5q 75% of Total (maximum of 75%)
Non -Federal Share
Estimated Local Share $ -q- % of Total (Cash)
q._ °/u of Total (la -kind)
Estimated State Share $21 q5q 25% of Total (trash)
g % of'rota I (In-kind)
Other Agency Share $ q % of Total
(Identify Other Non -Federal Agency NIA
Total Funding sources from above $84,200 1t14 Total % (should equal 144%)
Other Non.FEMA Federal Funds $ N/A (Do not include in fatal)
(Identify Other Federal Agency N/A
E. Project Milestones
List the major milestones in this project by providing an estimated time -line for tile critical activities.
Number ofDays to Complete
ilestone
[e.g.,. Demolition of G structures and removal of debris14 days]
Provide adequate window protection for public wind slreiter.
7•days following :sward of contract
Page 7 of 15
CA
40
.!,M Section V. Environmental Review (MITE. This application cannot beprocessed ifthis section is not completed.)
Because the HMGPlFMA are federally funded programs, all projects are required to undergo an environmental review as pan of the
grant application process. Moreover, all projects must comply will, the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and associated
Federal, State, Tribal, and Local statutes to obtain funding. NO WORK can he done prior to the NEPA review process. If work is
done on your proposed project before the NEPA review is completed, it will NOT be eligible for Federal funding.
A. National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) Documents
All projects must haveadequate NFPAdocumentation drat enables thcrEMA Regional Environmental Ojjfcerlo determine ifthe proposed
project complies with NEPA acrd associaledstalutes. The FEMA Mitigation Division Environmental Specialists provide comprehensive
NEPA technical assistance for States and Applicants, with their consent, to complete the NEPA review. The type and quantity of NEPA
documents required to make this determination varies depending upon the project's size, location, and complexity. However, at a
minimum, please provide the applicable docamentafion frt n this section to facilitate the NEPA compliance process.
lfyour project fess into one of rlre descriptions listed below.-
development
elow.development of mitigation plans;
inspection and monitoring activities;
studies involving only staff time and funding-,
training activities using existing facilities;
please include the following required NEPA dacumerrtatiom:
0 Detailed project description, scope afwork, and budgetdcosts (Section II (p. 3) and Section IV (p, 4))
For all other projects, attachlinclude the following NEPA documentsfinformatiott:
❑ Detailed project description, scope of work, and budgedcosts (Section 11(1). 3) and Section IV (p. S) of this application)
0 Project area maps (Section III, part A & Q of this application (p. 4)).
❑ Project area/structure photographs (Section til, part C of this application (p. 4)).
O Project alternatives description and impacts (part B of this section of the application (pp. 7-9)).
f] A letter frtnn the State liistaric Preservation Officer (SIIPO) regarding cultural resources (archeological and historic) in
the project area (NOTE: Please irrfortn the SHPO if a stntcture ro be altered is over SO year:, old.)
Cl Provide any applicable information ordocumentation referenced on the"Information and Documentation Nerds by Project
Type " chart (page 10ofthisapplication)
R, Alternative Actions
The NEPA process requires that at least two alternative actions be considered that address the same problernlissue as the proposed
project. In this section, list two feasible alternative projects to mitigate the hazards faced in the project area. One alternative is
the "No Action Altentalive,"
No Action Alternative
Discuss the impacts on the project area if no action is taken:
If no action is taken, there will be a continued public safety threat to the citizens of Indian River County due to the
current deficit of "safe" shelter space.
Page 8 of 15
•
4M
nM t3, Alternative Actions (continued)
2. Other Feasible Alternative
Discuss a feasible alternative to the proposed project. "dais could be an entirely different mitigation method or a significant
modification to the design of the current proposed project. Complete all of parts a -e (below) and include engineering details (if
applicable).
a. Project Description for the Alternative
Describe, in detail, the alternative project. Also, explain how the alternative project will solve the problem(g) and/or
provide protection from the hazard(s).
b, project Location of the Alternative (describe briefly)
d Attach a map or diagram showing the alternative site in relation to the proposed project site
• Photographs (2 copies) of alternative site
c. :Scope of Work for Alternative project
Page 9 of 15
40
C-1
4w' R. Alternative Actions (continued)
d. Impacts of Alternative Project
Below, discuss the impact of this alternative on the project area. Include comments on these issues as appropriate:
Environmental Justice, Endangered Species, Wetlands, Hydrology (Upstream and Downstream surface water
Impacts), Floodplain/ Floodway, Historic Preservation and Hazardous /Materials.
e. Estimated Budget/Costs for Alternative Project
In this section, provide details of all the estimated costs of the alternative project (round Figures to the nearest dollar),
1. Materials
rem Dimension 011anti Cog per Unit t ost
2. Labor (Include equipment costs --please indicate all "soft" or in-kind matches)
pescriplion Hours Rale C,USt
3. Fecs Paid Include any other costs associated with the project.
Descripdon of Task H --Ours ale Cost
Total Estimated Project Cost S -0-
Page 10 of 15
sk
4a
40
N.
al
uj
1. go ;
l
rl
.0 E
Vi
S
Ei
U
P r
'C.- 12
rl 0
Oc
CL U
'8 P-
PI
0 r=
_0
ZU
N.
O
C1
4MM Section VI. Matntennnee Agreement
All applicants whose proposed project involves the retrofit or modification of evisting public property or
whose proposed project would restill in the public ownership or management ol'property, structures, or
facilities, must trst sign the following agreement prior to submitting their appl cation to FEMA.
(NOTE. Those applicants whose project only involves the retrofitting, elevation, or other modification to
private ,property where the ownership will remain private after project completion DO NOT have to
complete this faun.)
The County of Indian River. State of Florida, hereby agrees that if it receives any Federal aid as a result of the
attached project application, it will accept responsibility, at its own expense if necessary, for the routine
maintenance of any real property, structures, or facilities acquired or constructed as a result of such Federal aid.
Routine maintenance shall include, but not be limited to, such responsibilities as keeping vacant land clear of
debris, garbage, and vermin; keeping stream channels, culverts, and storm drains clear of obstructions and
debris; and keeping detention ponds free of debris, trees, and woody growth.
The purpose of this agreement is to make clear the Subgrantee's maintenance responsibilities following project
award and to show the Subgrantee's acceptance of these responsibilities. It does not replace, supercede, or add
to any other maintenance responsibilities imposed by Federal law or regulation and which are in force on the
date of project award.
Signed by Fran B. Adams the duly authorized representative
(printed or typed name ofsigning official)
Chairperson Board of County Commissioners
(title)
this 71" (clay) of November (month), 2000 (year).
Signature* N t _ k' q- W244t.�Q- -
*Please. nate: The above signature must be by an individual ivitlt legal signing authorily for the
respective local government or county (e.g., the Chairperson, Board of County Commissioners or the
County Manager, etc.)
1'4tgo 12 of 15
C-3
i
40
Benefit -Cost Worksheet
for
Shelter Retrofit Projects
(This. Section MUST Be Completed)
Page 13 of 15
40
CA
liazard 1Niiigation Grant Prograln Sheller Projects Qtlly Bencfit Cost Data Collection Morin
A. Project 111farmatton
Complete
A separate %vorkshect is required for cacti structure J . yes no
Photographs of all elements of the building to be retrofitted , yes J Ito
Engineer's certification for level orproteetion proposed yes J no
Attach completed LRDivf Table and Survey Checklist J yes ____ no
B. Building Data
Select Building Type (Before Mitigation)
Lightly Engineered
Fully Engineered J
Building Site (Miles Inland) 5.5
Number of Stories above Grade 1
Construction Date 1986
Historic Building Controls
Disaster Number FEMA -1300 -DR -FL
C. Building Size and use
Describe the normal day-to-day function of the facility: Public Education
Total floor area 65.714 (sf)
Area occupied by owner or PubliclNon-profit Agencies 65.714 (sf)
For the following. enter the square
feet for the applicable
Building
Existing (SF)
0
4600
Area to be used
Proposed (SF)
24.500
4600
24'500_
Critical Facility
Host Shelter
Hurricane Evacuation Shelter (HES)
0
Primary Host Shelter
0
24.600
Recovery Shelter
4600
_ 4600
Refuge
0
24.500
' Risk Shelter
0
— — NIA
24.500
—NIA
Secondary Host Shelter
Other (attach explanation)
D. Building Value
Building Replacement Value1 millircn
Page 14 of 15
Ab
•
r E. Building Contents
Contents description: Educational materials
Total Value of Contents:-Ea—if-Market value
F. Value of Public Non -Profit Service
Page 15 of 15
Existing
Proposed
Description of Services Provided Public Education
Public Education/Safe
Shelter Space for the
Public
Number of Persons Served by Facility 848
1.225
or Capacity
Average Cost to Operate Facility N/A
N/A
($/day) _
Post -Disaster Continuity Premium N/A
N/A
($/day)
G. Mitigation Project Data
Project Description : Placement of window shutters in order to eliminate or significantly reduce
the deficit of "safe" shelters ace in Indian River Count .
Project Useful Life (Years): 50
Mitigation Project Costs:_ 4200
Base Year of Costs: $84,200
Annual Maintenance Costs ($/year) -0-
Notes and Additional Information.
Page 15 of 15
�lw
LI
e pP lee
Indian ever County
f
V, Board of County Commissioners
ri'vev ` ,�•� Department of Emergency Services
�Q
Q�NCY S 1840 25th Street, Vero Beach, Florida 32960
September 25, 2000
Hank Erikson
Florida Department of Community Affairs
Division of Emergency Management
2555 Shumard Oak Boulevard
Tallahassee, FL 32399-2100
RE: LMS ENDORSEMENT
SHELTER RETROFIT PROJECTS
Dear Mr. Erikson:
As Chairman of the Indian River County Local Mitigation Strategy 'Working Group, I would like
to offer my support to the submission of hazard Mitigation Grant Program Applications for
Shelter Retrofit Projects for Indian River County.
As a result of implementing an approved project prioritization methodology, a list of ranked
projects was generated and approved by the Indian River County LMS Working Group at its
August 18, 1999 meeting. The LMS was formally adopted by Resolution of the Board of County
Commissioners on November 16, 1999. One of the approved projects was to seek funding for
retrofits to the county's public schools, which serve as public shelters, to reduce vulnerability to
winds and flood damage, thereby reducing the county's safe shelter deficit.
If you have any questions, please don't Hesitate to call me.
Sincerely,
Douglas aight, Director
Chairman, LMS Working Group
cc: Nathan McCollum, Emergency Management Coordinator
Division of Division of Division of division of
Emergency Medical Animal Control Fire Services I mergency Management
Services 567.8000 562.2028 567.81100
557.8000 Ext. 446 Ext. 444
Ext. 217
SUNCOM 124.1444 FAX (561) 567.9323
EI
W
40
$
-ujI"
2
/
\�
gk
q
/MCC
LLJ
%
Loi
O <
U4n
@_
�
\
�.LLM
Ice
.%
C. -NQ
MCC
»
Izo
..r
�
\
�_
a
/qE
2t
.
\ * \
cc
§ 8
§
��
k
@
4a
40
40
-_ -
L
� _
_ �
c
a
r- ,.. ..
AD
.'
-b
l
i�� 4Ri f�i
(13 hl�
E_J.
a)
wtl
(D
C
»
0 .wk
a�
LL.
CD
01
oq 11
ay
yr
v
a
n
04
C-1
40
C-1
0g0V
FINAL REPORT
SHELTER EVALUATIONS for THE STATE OF FLORIDA
11D No - 204
Survey Date: December 3, 1999
Facility Name: Glendale Elementary School (Classrooms)
Address: 4940 81h Street, Vero Beach, Florida, 32960
Coordinates:
Latitude: N27039'06"
Longitude: W80°26'13"
Discussions:
Glendale Elementary School is located on 8th Street S.W. approximately 2.5 miles west of U.S. 1. Under
the direction of Indian River Department of Emergency Management, tine classroom areas were evaluated
as a possible hurricane evacuation shelter.
Flood and Hazmat Considerations:
A site plan showing existing elevations was not available but the campus is located in a Zone X area
according to Flood Insurance hate Map, panel 165 of 169, Map No.12061CO165 E, with an effective date
of May 4, 1989. Evidence of flooding or parading was not apparent.
The HES building is within the Vulnerability Zone of two Section 302 facilities but there's a low release
potential in a hurricane event. Information was provided by local emergency management that the
chemicals ammonia, chlorine, hydroflouric acid and sulfuric acid were present in these facilities.
The campus is not located within a ten mile Emergency Planning Zone of a nuclear facility
i
40
11
Wind and Wind -Related Considerations:
Wind hazard types taken into consideration during site inspection include lay -down hazards, roll-over
hazards and debris hazards. Hazards in the form of tall trees were noted on the all sides of the building
designated for use as an HES. Northern and eastern exposures are described as flat, open and heavily
wooded with open playing fields located between school and wooded areas. Southern and eastern
exposures are flat with the southern portion heavily wooded and the western portion lightly wooded. The
southern portion contained Tightly constructed metal covering over metal benches. The eastern area
contained a lightly constructed metal covering over an unsecured bicycle rack and unsecured picnic tables,
There is a limited exposure to wind-borne debris within 300 feet of the facility. The building was designed
in 1986 to a wind speed of i 10 mph with a 1.1 importance factor applied to the design; there are no
obvious wind design flaws with the exception of lightweight metal open walkways between structures.
Building Characteristics:
A partial set of structural and architectural plans for this facility was provided for evaluation. A clearly
defined continuous load path from foundation to roof is present. Upon site inspection and review of
structural plans it was evident that the buildings' exterior walls are constructed of fully reinforced
cantilevered masonry and have no softspot areas. The plans called for an V CMU with a 4" brick veneer
wall construction. 5" pipe columns (standard weight] were employed extending from the concrete, steel
reinforced footers to top of walls. 36" steel truss girders (48" cic) are attached to bearing points with two
1f4" full development fillet welds. The roof is flat with a T overhang and decked with standard corrugated
metal decking, 4" lightweight concrete, and a modified bitumen roof covering. Roof design load is
calculated to be 60 lbs. per square foot with a net uplift load of 28 lbs per square foot. Mechanical
equipment was noted on the roof in the form of air handlers and large vents which were not securely
fastened, No evidence of ponding or degradation was present on the roof. All drains were clear and free
of debris.
Windows, of an unknown glass type, comprised 11% of total exterior wall space. No shuttcringlprotective
system was in place for either windows or exterior doors.
The building was in good condition with no visible signs of damage.
Life Safety/Emergency Power:
At the time of survey, the building conformed to fire codes. There was an emergency power supply
generator on site which powers safety lights, fire alarms, kitchen equipment, exit Eights, freezers and
emergency lighting.
Conclusions:
When analyzed using the criteria outlined in the ARC 4496 Least -Risk Decision Making Guideline
Compliance Summary, Glendale Elementary School was found to have characteristics which fall under
the categories of preferred, marginal and tion -compliant.
r ]
40
4D
Preferred characteristics of this facility include:
• The building and its access road are located outside the Category 5 storm surge innundation.
• The building and its access road are located outside the 506 -year floodplain (none X),
• The building is in good condition with no apparent signs of deterioration.
• The buildings' exterior walls are constructed of fully reinforced masonry.
• No evidence of degradation is present on roof.
• An Emergency Standby Power Generator exists on site.
Marginal characteristics of thus facility include:
• The building has a flat, lightweight roof system:
• Evidence of minor ponding was present on roof.
• Light steel frame and cantilever walls exist.
• Minimal hazards within lay -down range of building.
• There is a limited exposure to wind-borne debris.
Non -,compliant characteristic of this facility include.
The building has unprotected windows and doors that lead into shelter areas.
Retrofit Recommendation:
M*9
•
Install shutters or other protective systems on unprotected systems windows to exterior doors to
meet the SBC Standard SSTD 12-94 of Dade County version of the South Florida Building
Code (Section 2314.1, 2314.5 and 1-2314.4).
Minor (Please note that while these minor retrofit recommendations will enhance the integrity of
shelter space evaluated they will not increase potential usable shelter square footage.)
• Remove potential lay -down hazards.
• Remove potential debris hazards.
• Secure portable classrooms and mobile homes on the site.
40
4w
40
Cl
40
Q MLLU I4
Least -Risk DCCisiOn Making: ARC 4496 Guideline Compliance Summary
Survey Date: Dec. & 1999 County;_1tidian River
Facility Name; Glendale El mentary Address: 494U 8tla Street
(0ms-00rns)
City; Vero Beach_ Stater_ Zip Code: 329G4
Coordinates: Latitude: Ifl "_ "' Longitude: W 80'23'13"
CRITERIA
PREFERRED
MARGINAL
NON-
COMPLIANT
1. Storni Surge
The building and its
Inundation
access road are located
outside the Category 5
storm surge inundation
zone, as determined by
the latest edition of
51.031{
2. Rainfall Flooding {
The building and its
Dain Considerations
access road are located
outside the 500 -year
floodplain (Zoite X) as
determined by the latest
edition of FIRM
3. Hazmat and
Alrhough the bldg. is
Nuclear Power Plant
located within a 301
Considerations
Vulnerability Zone,
!here are insufficient
nr uantilles to produce a
hazard following an
emnf.
4. Lay -down Hazard
Medhon-size trees
Exposure
present, but are not
large enough to be
slgncant hazard.
5. Wind and Debris
The campus is located in
Exposure
terrain with limited wind
and debris exposure.
CA
i
C1
dCCM 2
CRITERIA
PREF> RRE1)
MARGINAL
NON-
COMPLIANT
6. Wind Design
Building was designed in
Verification
1985 and has no obvious
winddesignflaivs. !find
design was 1/0 mph widr
1.1 imporlarree factor.
7. Construction Type
Single story light steel
I Loadpath
frame with fully
reinforced masonry
Verification
cantilever walls; clearly
defined and continuous
loadpath front roof to
foundation is present
8. Building Condition
The building is in good
condition with no
apparent signs of
deterioration
9. 'Exterior Wall
The building's exterior
Construction
walls are constructed of
fully reinforced masonry
and have no sofispot
areas.
10. Fenestrations I
Unprotected windows
Window Protection
and door panels; doors
are metal security type;
direct exposure to
shelter area and less than
15% window area
11. Roof Construction
The building has a flat,
I Roof Slope
lightweight roof with
engineered mechanical
connections to support
structures below.
12. Roof Open Span
The building has a roof
system with no distances
between verlic al supports
that are greater !Fran 40
feet
13. Roof Drainage/
Evidence of minor
Ponding
ponding ispresent on
roof
O
i
40
�71��1J
CRITERIA
PREFERRED
MARGINAL
NON-
COMPLIANT
t4. Interior Safe
NIA
Space
15. Life Safety/
An Emergency Standby
Emergency Power
Power Generator exists
on site.
Italicized items revised 6(9/00 at the request oojhrdian River C'ounly.
E-A
li
AMERICAN RED CROSS
•
PRIMARY SN[LTERS '' f
'2Z56
Fellsmere Elementary School
2,qm- V.B.H.S. Freshman Learning Center
1
50 North Cypress Street
1507 19th Street
Fellsmere, Florida 32948
Vero Beach; Florida 32960
Prone 561-571-0110
Phone 561-562-6242
2.70 46' 11 "1080° 36' 15"
270 38' 10"/0800 24' 09"
y 7&50�
Sebastian Elementary School
��gp Gifford Middle :School
400 County Road 512
2726 45th Street.
Sebastian, Florida 32958
Gifford, Florida 32967
Phone 561-589-2835
Phone 561-562-5429
270 48' 14'10800 28' 35"
270 40' 30"10800 24' 46"
2,oD
Glendale Elementary School
�+ 1 -zooHighlands Elementary School
4940 8th Street
500 20th Street
Vero Beach, Florida 32960
Vero Beach, Florida 32962
Phone 561-778.4687
Phone 561-778-1622 ,
270 39' 06"/0800 26' 13"
270 34' 02"/0800 23' 01"
Sebastian Rvr Mid, Jr. Hi. School 6 /) (0 Co Pelican island Elementary School
9400 County Road 512.
1355 Schumann Drive
Sebastian, Florida 32958
Sebastian, Florida 32958
Phone 561-589-8994
Phone 561-5891,5425
270 46' 09"/0800 31' 01"
270 45' 46'101300 27' 50"
f
J.A. Thompson Elementary SchoolI*6BI i0o Vero Beach Ser for High School
1110 18th Avenue, S.W.
1707 16th Street
Vero Beach, Florida 32962
Vero Beach, 'Florida 32960
Phone 561-589-8594
Phone 561-778-7000
270 46' 09"/0800 31' 01
270 37' 52'/01300 24' 16"
Z 313 ZS'Oslo Middle School
480 20th Avenue SW
IV,67 366 AC311-2Gi.ML,
Vero Beach, Florida 32962
Phone 561-564-3980
CIYL 510 — S
270 35' 42"/0800 24' 18"
TCaTl3+L
�(oi 00 C)