Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2000-337LState of Florida oo-3371. -7-/_ o Hazard Mitigation Grant Program Application for Shelter Retrofit Projects Department of Community Affairs Division of Emergency Management Bureau of Recovery & Mitigation (850) 410-3154 41 tr C3 0 STATE OF FLORIDA HAZARD MITIGATION GRANT PROGRAM (IIMGP) FLOOD MITIGATION ASSISTANCE (TMA) Application USE ONLY FEMA--'AR•FL O Standard HMP ❑ 5% Initiative Application ❑ Application Complete 0 Standard FMA El Initial Submission or 0 Resubmission Support Documents Eligible Applicant Project Type(s) R Conforms with State 409 Pian d State or Local Government 177 Wind ❑ In Declared Area © Private Non -Profit (Tax ID Received) ❑ Flood ❑ Statewide ORecognized Indian Tribe or Tribal Organization ❑ Other Community NFIP Status: (ChKk all thalaWy) p Participating Community ID #: to In Good Standing 0 Hon -Participating D CRS l State Application ID State Reviewer_ Reviewer Phone # Reviewer fax # Reviewer Email: Date Application !Received Date: This application is for all Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA Region IV) Hazard Mitigation Grant Program (HMGP) and Flood Mitigation Assistance (FMA) proposals. Please complete ALL sections and provide the documents requested. If you require technical assistance with this application, please contact your State Emergency Management Division at (850) 922.5269. Page 2 of 15 40 • A To Fill Out This Application; complete all sections which correspond with the type of proposed project General Application Socflons: pp.1-6: All Applicants must complete those sections Environmental Review: pp. 7-10: All Applicants must complete these sections Maintenance Agreement: p. 11: Any applications involving public property, public ownership, or management of property Acquisition Worksheet: pp.12-14: Acquisition Projects only -- one worksheet per structure Elevation Worksheet: pp.15-19: Elevation Projects only -- one worksheet per structure Drainage Workshoet: p. 20: Drainage Projects only Wind Retrofit Warksheet.: pp. 21-22; Wind retrofit projects only (HMGP only) - one worksheet per structure AfiachmentA: FEMA Form 90-49 (Request for Public Assistance): All Applicants must complete, if applicable. Attachment B. HMGPfFMA Application Completeness Checklist: All applicants are recommended to complete this checklist B. Applicant Information FEMA -J1300 -DR -FL Disaster name: Hurricane F`iayd Title l Brief Descriptive Project Summary: Sfteitar retrofits to increase the counts shelter capacity. 1.Applicant (Organization): Indian River County Department of Emergency Services 2. Applicant Type: 0 State or Local Government o Recognized Native American Tribe ❑ Private Non -Profit 3. County: Indian River 4. Slate Legislative district(s); 80 Congressional District(s): 15 5. Federal Tax I.R. Number: 59-6000674 6. TIPS Code: 061-9906100 7. National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) Community Identification Number (this number can be obtained from the FIRM map for your area): 120119 8. NFIP Community Rating System Class Number: 7 9. Attach proof of current Flood Insurance Policy (FMA only). Flood Insurance Policy Number: N/A 10. Point of Contact ❑Ms. ®Mr. oMrs. First Name: Nathan Last Name: McCollum Title: Emergency Management Coordinator Street Address: 1840 25" Street City: Vero Beach State: Florida Zip Code: 32960 Telephone: (561) 567.8000, Ext. 289 Fax: 561 770-5017 Email Address (if available): ircesnat@sunet.net - 11. Application Prepared by: OMs. FJMr, OMrs. First Name: Nathan Last Name: McCollum Title: Emergency Management Coordinator Telephone: (561) 567-8000 Ext, 289 Fax: (5611770-5011 12. Authorized Applicant Agent (proof of authorization authority required) oMs. GMr, oMrs. First Name; Douglas Last Name: — Wright Title: Director Telephone:F 45611567-8000, Ext. 2251 Fax: (5611770-5017 Street Address: 1840 25" Street City: Vigoeach Slate; Flartda�ZJode: ,Q 32960 __ Signature 13- All proposed projects should be included in the county's Local Mitigation Strategy (LMS), please attach a letter of endorsement for the project from the county's Local Mitigation Strategy Coordinator. (See endorsement attached). Page 3 of 15 40 Section I. History of Hazards / Damages in the Area to be Protected A. Overview of Past Damages Describe a[/ past damages from hazardous events in the project area (include name of storm, if applicable), including direct and indirect costs. Include Presidentially declared disasters as well as events that did not result in a Presidential declaration, Attach any supporting documents. Direct costs should include damages to structures and infrastructure in the project area as a result of the hazard. Indirect costs should include the cost to the local government to respond to victims of the hazard in the project area, any interruption to local businesses, and lasses of public services (3 examples are provided for your reference). Dae Fregue fcy of Event Damages ($) Indirect costs (describe) 9113/99 1iurricane Floyd $950,000 in county damage $69,000 for evacuations and emergency preparations (10 year event) 10114/99 hurricane Irene $250,000 in county damage -0- (5-year event) Section 11. Project Description A. Hazards to be Mitigated / Level of Protection 1, Select the type of hazards the proposed project will mitigate: 0 Flood ® Wind ❑ Storm surge Q Other (list) 2. Identify the type of proposed project: 13 hlevation and retrofitting of residential or non-residential structure 17 Acquisition and relocation 0 Acquisition and demolition 0 Wind retrofit ❑ Minor drainage project that reduces localized flooding ❑ Other (please explain) 3. List the total number of persons that will be protected by the proposed project: 5,000 4. Fill in the level of protection and the magnitude of event the proposed project will mitigate, (e.g. 23 structures protected against the 100 -year (1%) flood) structures protected against the -year Flood (10, 25.50. 100. or 500 year) 1 structures protceted against 145 mile per hour (mph) winds S. Enghreered projeers only (e.g. Drainage Improvements), include (attach to this page) ALL engineering calculations and design plans used to determine the above leve.[ of protection. 6. Project will provide protection against the hazard(s) above for 50 years (i.e,, what is the useful life of the LLproject). Page 4 of 15 0 • • Project Description, Scope of Work, and Protection Provided Describe, in detail, the existing problem, file proposed project, and the scope ofwork. Explain haw the proposed project will salve the problems) and provide he level(s) of protection described in Pan A. Please attach a vendor's estimate andlor a contractor's bid for the scope of work. The County is currently experiencing a severe deficit of safe shelter spaces for our residents seeking shelter from hurricane events. 'rhe safe shelter spaces that currently exist only provide protection for wind speeds of up to 60 m.p.h. Retrofitting existing public shelters with a hardened window protection will reduce that shelter deficit and provide a safe haven for our evacuees for wind events of up to 145 m.p.h. Section III. Project Location (Fully describe the location of the proposed project.) A. Site 1. Describe the physical location of this project, including street numbers (or neighborhoods) and zip codes; and if available, please provide precise longitude and latitude coordinates for the site utilizing a hand-held global positioning system (GPS) unit or the equivalent. iF I.A. Thompson Elementary School 1110 1'." Avenue Vero Beach, FL 27° 46' 09"1030° 31' Ol`" 2. Is the project site seaward of the Coastal Construction Control Line (CCCL)? OYES ® NO 3. 'Provide the nurnbcr of each, structure type (listed below) in the project area that will be affected by the project. That is, all structures in project arca. residential property businesses 1 commercial property public buildings X schools 1 hospitals I ]rouses of worship other B. Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) showing Project Site Attach a copy of the FIRM map, a copy of the panel information from rile FIRM, and, if available, the Floodway Map. FfRM maps are required for this applicalior, (if published far your area). 11sa, all aimehed maps must have the project site and structures clearly marked on the reap. FIP.Ms are typically available from your local floodplain administrator who may be located in a planning, zoning, or engineering office. Maps can also be ordered from the Map Service Center at 1-800-358-9616. For more information about FiRMs, contact your local agencies or visit the FIRM site on tine FFMA Web -page at htt .11www.ferna, ovi I, a IncIMSC/hard copy.htn Using the FIRM, determine the flood zone(s) of the project site (0reck all zones in titre project area). (see FIRM legend for flood, zone explanations) CI VE or V t-30 ❑ AE or A 1-30 ❑ AO or All ❑ A (no base flood elevation given) ❑ B or X (shaded) 0 Cor X (unshaded) ❑ Floodway ❑ Coastal Barrier Resource Act (OBRA) Zone (Federal regulations strictly limit Federal funding far projects in this Zone; please coordinate with your state agency before submitting an application for a CBRA Zone project) If the FIRM Map for your area Is not published, please attach a copy of like flood Ilazaid Boundary Map (FIIBM) for your area, with the project site and structures clearly marked on the map Page 5 of 15 40 C1 �I "1111iC. City or County Map with Project Site and Photographs 0 Attach a copy ofa city or county scale map (large enough to show the entire project area) with the project site and structures marked on the map. 0 Attach a USGS 1:24,000 topo map with project site clearly marked on the reap. 0 For acquisition or elevation projects, include copy of Parcel Map (Tax Map, Property Identification Map, etc.) showing cacti property to be acquired. 17he map should include the Tax IP numbers for each parcel, if possible. 0 Attach photographs (2 copies each) for each project site. 'rite photographs should be representative of Che project area, including any relevant streams„ creeks, rivers, etc. and drainage areas which affect the project site or will be affected by the project. Section IV. Budget/Costs In this section, provide details ofall the estimated costs of the project. As this information is used for the Benefit -Cost Analysis, reasonable cost estimates are essential. Since project administrative costs are calculated on a sliding scale, do trot include them in the budget. Also, do not include contingency costs in the budget. A. Materials Limon Dimension Q_yanlify Cost Cost SEE BELOW B. Labor (Include equipment costs -- please indicate all "soft" or in-kind matches) Jescri tion Hours Rale Cort SEE BELOW C. Fees Paid Include any other costs associated with the project. Descri. tion o f 7ask !fours Rare Cost N/A Total Estimated Project {Cost S G1.G00* *The estimated cost of this project includes all labor and materials based on an estimate provided by a professional and licensed project contractor. Estimates were not detailed with materials and labor, as is customary with projects oTtitts type. Page 6 of 15 40 C� a D. Funding Sources (round figures to the nearest dollar) The maximum FEMA share fur IIAJCp1JAfA projects is 75%. The other 25% can be made up of State and Local funds as well as in- kind services. Moreover, the FMA program rerluires that tine maximum in-kind match be no more than 12.5% of the total project costs. 14MGPIFMA funds may be packaged with other Federal funds„ but other federal funds (except for Federal funds which lose their Federal identity at the State level — such as CDBG, ARS, HOME) may not be used for the State or Local match. Estimated FEMA Share $46,200.00 75%ofTotal (maximum of 75% Non -Federal Share Estimated Local Share Estimated State Share $ -0- $ 15 400.00 %of Total (Cash) • of Total (in-kind) 25 % of Total (Cash) % WNW (In-kind) other Agency Share $ -0- %b of Total (identify Other Nan -Federal Agency NIA 1 Tota! Funning sources front above $61,600.00 100 Total % (should equal 1001%) Other Nan -FEMA Federat Funds $ NIA (Do not include in total) (Identify Other Federal Agency E. Project Milestones List the major milestones in this project by providing an estimated time -line for tine critical activities. Milestone [e.g.. Gernotition of G structures and rernov¢t of debris 1.4 days Provide adequate window protection (or public wind shelter. Number tt I7a s to Cprx fete 7 -days roLoiving atvard of contract Page 7 of 15 i 30 .Section V. Environmental Review (NOTE: This application cannot he proressed if this seetlan is nut completed.) Because the HMGPIFMA are !federally funded programs, all projects are required to undergo an environmental review as part of the grant application process. Moreover, all projects mast comply with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and associated Federal. State, Tribal, and Local statutes to obtain funding. NO 1VORK can be done prior to the NEPA review process. If work Is done on your proposed project before the NEPA review Is completed, It will NOT be eligible for Federal funding. A. National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) Documents d ll projects mttsthat,eadequateNEPA documentation that enables the FEMA Regional Environmental Dfcerto determinelftheproposed project complies with NEPA and associeued statutes. The FEMA Mitigation Division Environmental Specialists provide comprehensive NEPA technical assistance far States and Applicants, with their consent. to complete the NEPA review. The type and quantity of NEPA documents required to ntake this determination varies depending upon the project's size, location, and complexity. However, at a minimum, please provide the applicable doctamentation front this section to facilitate the NEPA compliance process. If pour project fits into one of the descriptions listed below: development of mitigation plans; inspection and monitoring activities; studies involving only staff tirnc and funding; training activities using existing facilities; please include the following required NEPA documenration., IJ Detailed project description, scope of work, and budge [/costs (Section it (p. 3) and Section IV (p. 4)) For all other projects, atracllinclude rhe following NEPA documents/information: ❑ Detailed project description, scope of work, and budget/costs (Section 11(p. 3) and Section IV (p. 5) of this application) ❑ Project area maps (Section Iii, part A& B of this application (p. 4)). ❑ Project area/structure photographs (Section III, part C of this application (p. 4)). ❑ Project altematives description and impacts (part B of this section of the application (pp. 7-9)). ❑ A letter front the State Historic Preservation Officer (SHPO) regarding cultural resources (archeological and historic) in lite project area (NOTE. Please inform the SHP0 if a structure to be altered is over 50 years old.) Cl Provide any applicable i nformat ion or documenta tion re fe renccd on the" hFformationandDocumentation Needs by Project Type -chart (page 10 of this application) B.. Alternative Actions The NEPA process requires that at least two a] le actions be considered that address the same problentlissue as the proposed project. In this section, list two feasible alternative projects to mitigate the hazards faced in the project area. One alternative is the "No Action Alternative:' 1. No Action Alternative Discuss the impacts on the project area if no action is taken: If no action is taken, there will be a continued public safety threat to (130 citizens of Indian River County due to the current dellelt of "safe" shelter space. Page 8 of 15 B. Alternative Actions (continued) 2. tither Feasible Alternative Discuss a feasible alternative to the proposed project. 'Iltis could be an entirely different mitigation method or a significant modification to the design of the current proposed project. complete an or parts a -e (below) and include engineering details (if applicable). a. Project Description for the Alternative Describe, in detail, tho alternative project. Also, explain how the alternative project will solve the problem(s) and/or provide protection from the hazard(s). h, Project Location of the Alternative (describe briefly) 0 Attach a map or diagram showing the alternative site in relation to the proposed project site 0 Photographs (2 copies) of alternative site c. Scone of Work for Alternative Project 0 rL 7 0 Page 9 of 15 B. Alternative Actions (continued) d. Impacts of ,Alternative Project Below, discuss the impact of this alternative on the project area. Include comments on these issues as appropriate: Environmental Justice, Endangered Species, Wetlands, ilydrology (Upstream and Downstream surface water Impacts), Floodplain/ Floodway, Historic Presarvation and Hazardous Materials. s , Estimated Budget/Costs for Alternative Project In this section, provide details of all the estimated costs of the ahomativc project (round figures to the nearest dollar). 1. Materials Item Diniens�ion uaretrr Costner unit Cns 2. Labor (include equipment costs --please indicate all "soil" or in-kind marches) Descrivtion Hours Rate Cost 3. Ices Paid Include any other costs associated with tire project. Dgsc�tion of Task Hours Rule COBE Total Estimated Project frost S A. Page 10 of 15 4D 0 0 —77 g p3 c 2 Erg Eon V f4 on Li 13 12 N v E UO LA 40 7. T, (5 SN ILI -- ;F o. J, U, 48 Ag • cc 0 Section VI. Maintenance Agreement All applicants whose proposed project involves the retrofit or n:odiftcation of existing public property or whose proposed project would result in thepublic ownership or muanag�entent of property, structures, or facilities, mustst sign the following agreement prior to submitting tlfeir application to FEMA. (NOTE; Those applicants whose project only involves the retro itting, elevation, or other modification to private property where the ownership will remain private aller project completion DO NOT have to complete this form.) The County of Indian River, State of Florida, hereby agrees that if it reccives any Federal aid as a result of the attached project application, it will accept responsibility, at its own expense if necessary, for the routine maintenance of any real property, structures, or facilities acquired or constructed as a result of such Federal aid, Routine maintenance shall include, but not be limited to, such responsibilities as keeping vacant land clear of debris, garbage, and vermin; keeping stream channels, culverts, and storm drains clear of obstructions And debris; and keeping detention ponds free of debris, trees, and woody growth. The purpose of this agreement is to make clear the Subgrantee's maintenance responsibilities following project award and to show the Subgrantee's acceptance of these responsibilities. It does not replace, supersede, or add Ito any other maintenance responsibilities imposed by Federal law or regulation and which are to force on the date of project award. Signed by Fran B. Adams the duly authorized representative (printed or typed name ofsigning official) Chat acrson Board of County Commissioners (title) this T" (day) of November (tnonth), 2000 (year). .i Signature* A -A *Please note: The above signature must be by not individual with legal signing authority for the respective local government or county (e.g., the Chairperson, Board of County Commissioners or the County Manager, etc.) Page 12 of 15 4w Benefit -Cost Worksheet for Shelter Retrofit Projects (This Section MIDST BC COMPlete(i} Page 13 ot 15 010 • 11azard Mitigation Grant Program Shelter Projects Only lienefit Cast Daia Collection Form Far the following, enter the square feet for the applicable A. Project Informatton Complete Critical Facility Host Shelter A separate worksheet is requircd for each structure ✓ yes no Hurricane Evacuation Shelter (HES) Photographs of all clements of the building to lie retrofitted —yes ✓ no Primary Host Shelter Engineer's certification for level of protection proposed yes ✓ na Recovery Shelter Refuge Risk Shelter Secondary Host Shelter Other (attach explanation) Attach completed LRDM Table and Survey Checklist ✓ yes _ no 0 0 NIA B. Building Data 1,800 NIA Select Building Type (Before Mitigation) Lightly Engineered Fully Engineered J Building Site (Miles Inland) 4.5 Number of Stories above Grade 1 Construction Date 1981 Historic Building Controls Disaster Number FEMA -1300 -DR -FI C. Building Size and Use Describe the normal day-to-day function of the facility: Public Education Total floor area 64.325 (so Area occupied by owner or Public/Non-profit Agencies64 325 (so Far the following, enter the square feet for the applicable Building Existing (SF) Area to be used Proposed (SF) 1,800 4.860 Critical Facility Host Shelter 0 4,860 Hurricane Evacuation Shelter (HES) 0 1.800 Primary Host Shelter 0 1,800 Recovery Shelter Refuge Risk Shelter Secondary Host Shelter Other (attach explanation) 4,860 4,860 0 0 NIA 1,800 1,800 NIA D. Building Value Building Replacernetlt Value Al million_ Page 14 of 15 do • ! E. Building Contents Contents description: Educational materials Total Value of Contents: Fair market value F. Value of Public Non -Profit Service Existing Proposed $ Description of Services Provided Public Education Public Educatlon/Safe Shelter Space for the Public Number of Persons Served by Facility 808 90 or Capacity _- Average Cost to Operate Facility N/A N/A ($/day) Post -Disaster Continuity Premium N/A N/A ($/day) G. Mitigation Project Data Project Description : Placement of window shutters in order to eliminate or significantly reduce the deficit of "safe" shelter space in Indian River County._ Project 'Useful Life (Years):, 50 Mitigation Project Costs: $61.60� Base Year of Costs:6$ 1.600 Annual Maintenance Costs ($/year) -0 - Notes and Additional Information: Page 15 of 15 i 4W L-1 r� 4h� Ri Indian River County `r Board of County Commissioners Department of Emergency Services 1840 25th Street, Vero Beach, Florida 32960 — - September 25, 2000 Hank Erikson Florida Department of Community Affairs Division of Emergency Management 2555 Shumard Oak Boulevard Tallahassee, FL 32399-2100 RE: LMS ENDORSEMENT SHELTER RETROFIT PROJECTS Dear Mr. Erikson: As Chairman of the Indian River County Local Mitigation Strategy Working Group, I would like to offer my support to (lie submission of Hazard Mitigation Grant Program Applications for Shelter Retrofit Projects for Indian River County. As a result of implementing an approved project prioritization methodology, a list of ranked projects was generated and approved by the Indian River County LMS Working Group at its August 18, 1999 meeting. The LMS was formally adopted by Resolution of the Board of County Commissioners on November 16, 1999. One of the approved projects was to seek funding for retrofits to the county's public schools, which serve as public shelters, to reduce vulnerability to winds and flood damage, thereby reducing the county's safe shelter deficit. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to call me. Sincerely, I nouglas ght, [director Chairman, LMS Working Group cc: Nathan McCollum, Emergency Management Coordinator Division of Division of Division of Division of tnrecgency Medical Animal Corftol Fife Services f ni fgency ManaVnml %vices 567.8000 562.2028 567.8008 567 8000 Ed. 446 Ext. 444 W. 217 SUNCOM 224.1444 FAX (561) 567.9125 � yn�vur .... 1 yr nn '1i n Y 3f1H3n�i f Llq w z -� 7�7M,iAY "Lot Z 7nWinV M161 LS3h,MIrk as e ., .. ; .. �I a (✓'j e� I,ij . - i • �4 rte- e' 1 f ® e 4 ._. 11 ... wqr•� [��✓7 rc 1 i y kj ,x CD _ f r P i ! f (U r i• , � r "' � f Cf) r 0 ry .w Ilk w ., a a FINAL REPORT EXECUTIVE 8VAIMAItY SMELTER EVALUATIONS for THE STATE OE FLORIDA m No.: 215 Survey Date: December 8, 1998 Facility Name: J. A. Thompson Elementary School (Cafetorium and Media Center) Address: 1110 18th Avenue Vero Beach, Florida, 32962 Coordinates: Latitude: N27°46'09" Discussion: Longitude: W80°31711" d1 I. A. Thompson Elementary School is located on l8th Aventic S.W. approximately 1.5 miles west of U.S. 1. Under the direction of Indian [liver Departinent of lrmrgency Management, the Cafetorium and Media Center were evaluated as a possible hurricane evacuation shelter. Flood and Ilazmat Considerations: A site plan showing existing elevations was not available but the campus is located in a Zone W area according to Flood Insurance Rate Map, panel 168 of 169, Map No.12061CO 168 C, with an effective date of May 4, 1989. Evidence of flooding or ponding was not apparent. The HE -S building is within the Vulnerability Zone of two Section 302 facilities that have a low release potential in a hurricane event. Information was provided by local emergency management that ammonia, chlorine, hydroflouric acid and sulfuric acid were present in these facilities. 1 -he campus is not located within a ten mile Emergency !Tanning Tone of a nuclear Facility. 40 i 40 Wind and Wind -Related Considerations: Wind hazard types taken into consideration during site inspection include lay -down hazards, roll-over hazards and debris hazards. Hazards in the form of light poles and tall trees were noted on the cast side of the buildings designated for use as an HES. Northern exposure is comprised of heavily wooded flat topography. Southern exposure is mostly residential and fiat as well as the eastern and western exposure. There is limited exposure to large and small wind -home debris within 300 feet of the facility. There was no verification of wind parameters used in the design. The building was designed in 1981 and has no obvious wind design flaws with the exception of lightweight metal open walkways between structures. Building Characteristics: A partial set of structural and architectural plans for this facility was provided for evaluation. A clearly defined continuous load path from foundation to roof is present. Upon site inspection and review of structural plans it was evident that the buildings' exterior walls are constructed of reinforced masonry. Reinforcing spacing was not noted so partial reinforcement is assumed. The plans called for an 8" CMU with a 4" brick veneer wall construction. 5" pipe columns (standard weight) were employed extending from the concrete; steel reinforced footers to top of walls. 36" steel truss girders (48" cic) are attached to bearing points with two 114" full development fillet welds. The roof is flat with a 3' overhang and decked with standard corrugated metal decking, 4" lightweight concrete, and a modified bitumen roof covering.. Roof design load (dead load plus live load) is calculated to be 52 lbs. per square foot. No evidence of ponding or degradation was present on the roof. All drains were clear and free of debris. It was noted that mechanical equipment in the form of exhaust shrouds for the kitchen area should be tied down in a more secure fashion. Windows, of an unknown glass type, comprised less than 7% of total exterior wall space. No shutteringlprotective system was in place for either windows or exterior doors. The stringency ranking of the model building code used during the year of the buildings design (1981) according to the State of r1orida Hurricane Shelter Evaluation Guidelines is a 2 on a scale of 0-4, the most stringent being 4. The building was in good condition with no visible signs of damage. Life Safety/El mergency Power: At the time of survey, the building conformed to fire codes. There was an emergency power supply generator on site which powers exit lights, freezers and emergency lighting. Conclusions: When analyzed using the criteria outlined in the ARC 4496 Least -Risk Decision Making .Guideline Compliance Summary, J.A- Thompson Flementary School was found to have characteristics which fall under the categories of preferred, and marginal. Preferred characteristics of this facility include: « The building and its access road arc located outside the Category 5 stone surge in utndation. • The building and its access road are located outside the 540 -year floodplain Gone X). • A clearly defined, continuous loadpath from roof to foundation is present. • The building is in good condition with no apparent signs of deterioration. No evidence of degradation is present on roof An Emergency Standby Power Generator exists on site. Marginal characteristics of this facility include: • There is limited exposure to large and small wind-borne debris. • No verification of wind parameters used in the 1981 design but no apparent flaws were noted. • The building has a flat, Iightweight roof system. • The buildings' exterior walls are constructed of reinforced masonry. • Minimal hazards within lay -down range of building. . • The building is within the Vulnerability Zone gf two Section 302 facilities but with low release potential. Retrofit Recommendation: Install shutters or other protective systems on unprotected systems windows to exterior doors to meet the SBC Standard SSTs D 12-94 of Dade County version of the 'South Florida Building Cade (Section 2314.1, 2314.5 and 1-2314.4). irto (Please note that wWlc these minor retrofit recommendations will enhance the integrity or shelter space evaluated they will not increase potential usable shelter square footage.) • 'Remove potential lay -down hazards. 41• Remove potential debris hazards. 0 I iPiM. � lIijiI iDifr(G;I i {]4}lt AR FA t1ti',1t7,1; PO i rM'I.') r NAM, 110"ITIINO:': DA ('ii 1Zi5Y: 1ISA IIILE:iTORMIRISK SHELTER AREA (ARC 4496 (`crMPLIAN't - sQUA RI; 1So?1i19t1;S4i.tj r.f,=;id il.`.-F[)?. Nln 0 I0 124,701 0 10 DA ('ii CAFFTOMUM 124,701 124,701 1ISA IIILE:iTORMIRISK SHELTER AREA (ARC 4496 (`crMPLIAN't - sQUA RI; 1So?1i19t1;S4i.tj r.f,=;id il.`.-F[)?. Nln 0 I0 124,701 0 10 40 • ti Access 10 # 2IS Least -Rill( Decision Making: ARC 4496 Guideline Compliance Summary Snrvey hate: I)ccember 8, 1996 County: Indian Riycr Facility Named A_ThomnsQn Elcsnenili_rY Address: 1110 18th Avenuc SW fC�t'ctoriunx and Media Ccnter } City: Ve Stater Zip Code- 32 Coordinates: Latitude: .N 27° 46'09" Longitude: W 8I}!311 CIUT"ERIA PREFERRED MARGINAL NON- COMPLIANT 1. Storm Surge The building and its Inundation access road are located outside the Category 5 storm surge inundation zone, as determined by the latest edition of SLOSH 2. Rainfall Flooding 1 The building and its Dam Considerations access road are located outside the 500 -year floodplain (Zone X) as determined by the latest edition of FIRM 3. Ilazmat and Building is within the Nuclear Power Plant Vu hie rabi I ity Zone of two Section 302 Considerations C facilities that have a low release potential in a hurricane event 4. Lay -down hazard No Hazards are ivithin Exposure lay -down range of the foci ify 5. Wind and Debris There is limited Exposure exposure to large and small wind-borne debris within 300 feet of Facility 61 CRITERIA PREFERRED MARGINAL NON- COMPLIANT b. Wind Resign No verification of wind Verification parameters used in design Building was designed in 1981 and has no obvious wind design flaws. 7. Construction Type A clearly defined and C Loadpath continuous loadpath from Verification roofto foundation is present H. Building Condition The building is in good condition with no apparent signs of deterioration 9. Exterior Wall The building's exterior Construction walls are constructed of reinforced masonry. 10. Fenestrations f Unprotected windows Window Protection and doors; doors are metal security type; direct exposure to she ll^_r area, less than 5% window area. 11. Roof Construction The building has a flat, J Roof Slope lightweight roof with engineered mechanical connections to support structures below. 12. hoof Open Span The building has a roof system with distances between vertical supports that are not greater than 40 feet 13. Roof Drainage 1 No evidence of ponding Ponding or depredation is present on roof 14. Interior Safe NIA Space 15. Life safely ! An Emergency Standby Emergency Power Power Generator exists on site. rrarrcrsea menu r� vrseu ar�[ruu err rexluesr of lrre7aun ,lover C'nunryr