HomeMy WebLinkAbout2000-366+ �,� 1: a_ APPNUM 01
SJRWMD office use
e9v- 34
ST. JOHNS RIVER WAFER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT
ALTERNATIVE WATER SUPPLY CONSTRUCTION COST SHARING
APPLICATION FORM
FY 2000-2001
Submission deadline: Applications must be received by SJRWMD or dated by the US Postal Service or a
commercial carrier no later than Friday, December 8, 2000. Submit 3 copies of this form and all supporting
materials to St<'u] Browning, St. Johns River Water Mamagement District, P.O. Box 1429, Palatka, FL, 32178-
1429 if sent by U.S. mail. Applications sent by courier should be addressed to 4049 Rcid Street, Palatka, FL,
32178-1429. For application assistance contact Stan Browning at 904-3294321 or stan_browning rJ
district. sjnvmd.statc.fl.us. You may add up to one additional page. of supporting material for any answer that
needs further explanation. Applications which are substantially incomplete or not completed according to
instructions will be disqualified. Excess materials will not be considered. Read and follow instructions!
Type or print clearly the requested information in the spaces providers.
A. Applicant Information
1. Name of Applicant: Indian River Count3JJtilitics Deparunent
(May be utility, local govcmment, agency, company, individual, or other.)
2. Name, address, and phone numbers of project manager or contact person.
SJRWMD will sent correspondence concerning this application ONLY to this person.
Name Michael C. Hotchkiss P.E.
Mailing address 1840 25`F' Street
City and zip code Vero Beach, FL 32960
Phone (561) 567-8000, ext. 1821 _ FAX 061),770-5143
(include are code) (include area code)
3. Name, address, and phone numbers of person with authority to enter into a contractual agreement,
if other than project manager or contact person.
Name Fran B. Adams, Chairman, Indian Rivcr County_Board of County Commissioners
Mailing address 1840 250' Street
City and zip code Vera (teach FL 32960
Phone (561)_567-8000, ext. 1830 FAX (,561) 770-5143
(include arca code) (include arca code)
Page A - 1
rPkSKRL'F7t,1Tik"t�d�IIf�.7 GII Y-SYa]lkrltL'LY lrakw VWA C--' Ik P—U 9shw Nos VI"- Aha *Wl S'41,r!0— 5Ly 59 1A, A1au..rriv 3,0l AkA�D@ '4w Nle
kw'Iw.wi Kyr ►'*�
C>
40
SJRWMD Alternative Water Supplies Construction Cost Sharing Application Force 2000-200 l
4. SJRWMD Permit Information.
Does the applicant have. any SJRWMD ;permits? Yes W No
If yes, list all SJRWMD consumptive use penmits held by the applicant AND any surface; water
management or environmental resource permits pertaining to the project. Attach an additional page
behind this page if needed.
Permit NarnberEYniratinn DJntc permit Number_ Expiration Date
2-461-0106NG^M2R_ 12-31-98 (*')
(* - Renewal Permit Anticipated Issuance Date January 20U1)
5, tither Permit Information.
List all types of permits required to constrict the: proposed project and
provide the status of efforts to obtain each permit.
Type Uf PCirnit
l'5511Fng Aj-wncy I"IaVC, pCnillt A[lp&gd Not Applied
U,tilijy Construction
FIXER �
Right of Way
Indian River County
Utility Construction
Indian Rivcr_CQuntyY _
6. Disclosure. Does any SJRWMD employee, Governing Board member, contractor or other affiliate of
the applicant have a financial interest in this project, the property wocialud with this project or with
any party that may profit financially fore this project? Yes No !•
If yes, identify all such parties and describe their interests.
Page A - 2
. k Ni61RLtiJ11119.0`lh¢tin ITt lJi Y'.k]10L4531CLti'lln;swfi .1 Nis, l'+w4sN 11mab'hlart Frit l'nrry x[Mw.aw W 3aF,i, 41.n.NrtFa sF.,�Fa{QI AJ,a A1MwAs wrw S�,k, x}F4.pa Nolle sw W 14
RR.... war La
40
40
4W
B. Project Information
1. Cost sharing request (S]RWMD's slinre cannot cxeccd 50°5 of total project cost.)
a. Total project cost .................................... ............a...-.....-$$.130.000
b. Amount of cost share requested ................................................. $115 000(5(}°f,),
2. Purpose. Explain the purpose(s) of the project. (do not refer to attachments.)
hnemise amount of rcclaimcd w+ jlcr by supplcmenting with R.0- conccntratc.
3. Brief description of project. Include approximate dimensions and capacities. (Do not refer to
attachments.)
Reverse Osmosis R.O. water treatment process involves micron level filtration that gcncratcs a waste
stream byproduct referred to as concentrate. Currently, concentrate is discharged to the Indian-ikivcr
where it is comminQlcd_«hlh the waters ref the L -n no tat ,.atcny and disposcd, This project will
provide for a portion of Clic concentrate to be mixed with reclaimed wate=r. Initi l 36 000 ,allons cr
las ppdj of conecntrtto will i}c mixed with 8').4)]0 and cpf n:elaimcd<watcr to provide Iii 0 0 gpci of
irrigation water for a tzolf course. As more muse lines arc constnict_Cd within the next Xear substantially
more cancantratc will .6c_AL -oscd of'.through reclaimed water. Initially,_ rite project will involve
constnrctine 2,000 linear feet of nolvethelene pi>3c_(PE) along, with a300.000gallon storage tank and
mixingapAaratus__ -- -----
EVALUATION FACTOR related to questions 2 and 3.
Will the project implement new or innovative procedures or technology, which can serve n<a a demonstration,
pilot project, or source of usclul Bala for water resource management? 1-10 points. Bused on roler's
ei.ssessrnent of 1he degree ri(innroivurion being firullu.iccd ur rhe ru ho,qfc1aw generated by the pru?evc•r, lath
greater innoe rtion or uscfidnes.s of dato gel ing mare points,
a. Project location (location or description):
The Count, s North Regional R.O. Water Treatment Facility i� located at the norh%vest, comer of 5R's
Ave_ and 770' Sl. The onsite c:onccntratc mixing and stor[ve facility shall be installed at the County's
North Rgional W W'1'1 healed on 77's St. approximately_ l-npilc a tst of S8'"
County lies) in "hick project is located: Indian Ri%,cr _ --
PageA-3
1 O1%Y%51 iY'iA9Y b'Y'Y4M5r11 fi Y1�'"Ai11F11„+YY14M1e1 YWYY'ra.Y�Ira 4WgAr YrF+?.Mi..�. t'irA'Y AMSR.eM'.M]ri, Ylri..M ALr'..4AY lA�. Af1eMr�WM Aypf,A�A.i-i 1M.w iM AF �i
IYri�wlw ss
4W
SIRWMD Alternative Water Supplies Construction Cost Sharing Application Fore 2000.2001
EVALUATION FACTOR related to question 4.
Is the project in an area identified by the SJRWMD Water Supply Assessment as a priority water resource;
caution arema or a delineated ansa`?'Ileis will be determined for you by SJRWMD staff. 0-5 points. Yes. Inside
caution area = 5; Yes, Inside delincalvel area a 3; No. Outside caution area andlor defineared area = 0.
5- Projected schedule
Projected starting date: mo. Jrine yr. 2001 . Completion date: mo. _lanuaa_ yr. - 2002
(Funds received through this program may be used only for projects constructed atter a cost sharing
contract has been executed and may not be used to reimburse the cost of existing structures or structures
alnWy underconstruction. Cost sharing contracts probably will be executed in April or May 2001).
6. Will water from this project directly take the place; of an existing or proposed withdrawal from a higher
quality watcrsource?......................_..........................._.............. Yes ko No
If yes, identify the source and quantity of higher quality water to be replaced.
Floridan aquifer ........... yes 11+ no _ 13.14^ million gallons per e r
Surficial aquifer ............. yes , no -million gallonsep r year
Surface water .............. yes no W million gallonseg r year
If surface; water, state name of water body
EVALUATION FACTOR related to question 6.
Will water from this project directly and effectively take the place of an existing or proposed higher quality
water source? 0-20 points. Based on raler's assessment nj' the G(]ecliveness of the project at saving potable
water and apparent relative cost effectiveness. Because of the great variation in types ol'prujects. calculations
of'cosi ejjeetiveness for widely dissimilar projects. such as urban reuse and agricidlirral freeze prolec•lion ponds
will not be crrm1wred.
7. Does the project provide other water resource benefits in addition to water supply, such as improving or
protecting ,ground or surface water quality, increasing recharge or conserving water? Yes Ys_ No
If yes, then describe benefits`? You may add one page atlachmcnt behind this page if necessary.
Mixing R.O. cong4c nttate water with reclaimed water will result in a opt reduction oIF approximately
36,000 -GPD less conce:ntratc beintt released to the Indian Ifiver.
EVALUATION FACTOR related to question 7.
Does the project provide other water resource benefits in addition to water supply,. such as improving or
protecting ground or surface water quality, increasing recharge or conserving water? 0-10 points. Based on
raler`s assessment q/'rhe extent aml signs frcance rYfadditional benefits.
RageA - a
'illFi#\1ia5N.7C�l�Y1M'I iILIi Y-G'i.illi}a;7M1'ftiya�.I:W,I'euaa��.iame'MMr.nwrt rl.�i)•A� �Wr indr'�rLasr SWMSIAW aMswswr]I �IIpµN.a,�lar!Ji wi!
Ilad_l wr 6s
•
SJRWMD Alternative Water Supplies Construction Cost 'Sharing Application From 2000-2001
8-a. is the project necessary to meet an environmental regulatory requirement of a local, regional, state, or
federal government agency"?..................................................Yes ✓ No
If yes, identify the agency artd regulatory program.
F.D.F.P. - Reduce amount of R.O.con esntrate water discharge to the _Indian River Lagoon.
8-b. Is the project being undertaken in response to enforcement actions taken against the applicant becausc
of failure to comply with permit conditions or other regulations? ......... -Yes k- No
If yes, name the agency and regulatory program. F.D.F.P. - N.P.D.E.S.
EVALUATION FACTOR related to question 8.
Is the project voluntary or is it necessary to comply with environmental regulalions requirement of a local, state
or federal government agencv; or an enforcement action by such an agency'! U-1 t1 points. Voluntary = 10:
Regulatory compliance = rater's assessment 0-9; Enforcemeni action = U.
9. is the current application for subsequent funding to a phased multi-year project previously funded under
thisprogram?..................................................................................Yes No r=
If yes, was the previous phase indicated to be a part of a multi-ycar project at the time of
application?.... . .......... ............ ................................ — Yes No
is the proposed project part of a master water or wastewater plan? .................. .Ycs Y No
If yes, attach a copy of relevant pagc(s) of the plan behind this page.
10. Is this project a cooperative effort with one or more other organizafions or agencies, other than the
applicant and SJRWMD?............................................................... ... Yes ✓ No
If yes, list other participants. You may add ante page attachment behind this page if necessary.
Indian Ri cr County is workiq&1A conjunction with the City of Vero Beach to achieve the sang means.
EVALUATION FACTOR related to question 9.
Is the project a cooperative effort with one or more other organizations, agencies, or governmental entities? 1-10
points. Based on raters assessment (#-the levet and significance ref support provided by other parties, with
greater :support getting more points.
OTHER EVALUATION FACTORS
I. Rater's evaluation. 0-10 points. Ruler's overall assessment and other relevani factors not .specifically
addressed else where.
2. I -las the applicant followed directions as instructed in preparing the application? Points will be deducted
from the applicant's scare for noncompliance including the inclusion of a largo amount of unnecessary
information. (-5)-D
Page A-5
eu�a+rru7 utx sruua�.ewt7+a.s � iso r.rs..r. k�a�.�r. p.+a r�v, . Fx��. x.e xy,y r..,�mw'�wna,u.. nwrt.., owe ate, Ny�r.r.er� niu r r �.�+1 wr L c
•
40
C1
Intro duction/Overview
Indian River County operates two water treatment facilities. Both facilities obtain raw
water from the Floridan Aquifer. This raw water requires treatment in order to meet
Federal Safe Drinking Water Act regulations. Indian River County utilizes state-of-
the-art membrane technology to remove undesirable constituents, mineral impurities,
and/or organic compounds. Both the South and North County facilities incorporate
nanofiltration membranes to remove undesirable particles in the raw water such as
bacteria, algea, clays, silts, cysts, Giardia, Cryptosporidium, viruses, hardness,
sodium, and chlorides. Nanofiltration is a low-pressure process that also softens the
water and removes disinfectant by-products.
Approximately eighty percent (80%) of the groundwater obtained from the raw water
well systems is recovered in the membrane process and used in the potable drinking
water system. The remainder, approximately twenty percent (20%) of the raw water
obtained from the well systems, is regulated by the Florida Department of
Environmental Protection (FDEP) and termed concentrate. The concentrate flow is
treated at each facility by disinfection (chlorine injection), air injection and static
mixing. Hydrogen suIfide and chlorine are removed prior to discharge to disposal.
Concentrate from the South County plant is discharged to the South Relief Canal, a
Class III water body, which flows into the Indian River, a Class III marine water body.
The North County plant discharges directly to the Indian River, a Class III marine
water body, at the County Road 510 bridge. For comparison purposes, total dissolved
solids in well water and concentrate are typically 700 and 3,500 mg1I, respectively.
Salinity of the Indian River Lagoon and Atlantic Ocean are typically 20,000 and 35,000
mg/l, respectively.
Discharges from both facilities are monitored and analyzed routinely according to
FDEP permit requirements. Indian River County is currently in the process of
renewing the concentrate disposal permits at both facilities. The Environmental
Protection Agency has been reviewing discharges such as these and is currently
formulating legislation regarding this issue. FDEP and water management districts
are currently struggling with the issue throughout the state. Indian River County, in
keeping with their mission statement: "to utilize all water resources in a sustainable
and cost-effective manner", authorized Camp Dresser & McKee Inc. (CDivl) on
December 7, 1999 to review current sampling efforts and investigate alternative
disposal options. The County hopes that this report may result in conservation of our
valuable resources. CDM"s work authorization and report are broken clown as
follows:
Section 1: Existing Treatment Systernf Issues
Section 2: Existing Water Quality Data/Techniques
Section 3: Alternative Disposal Options
Section 4: Concentrate Team Meetings
Section 5: Recommendations
CDM Camp Dfftwr a McKuc Inc.
0330OK"I'law
Indian River County Utilities
Concentrate Disposal Options
UAB Response:
The UAB decided against pursuit of this option in lieu of other potential options at the
May 4, 2000 meeting.
3.4 Stormwater Mixing
Concentrate may be diluted with stormwater for disposal. Mixing the concentrate
with stormwater would require that the stormwater system be available for
connection. Possible problems include retention volume, mixing ratio and reliability
of stormwater volumes. Since concentrate production is constant, a consistent supply
of stormwater would be required for diluting purposes. This option may be
advantageous during wet weather.
UAB Response:
The UAB recommended this option be pursued as an option once the Stormwater
Master planning efforts are underway. Further discussions with Indian River Farms
Water Control District are necessary.
3.5 Reuse Mixing
Mixing reuse water with concentrate and disposing the product through the reuse
water distribution system is another possible solution. The concentrate water would
have to be blended with reuse water at a ratio that would allow the water to be land
applied for irrigation purposes. Possible problems would include possible vegetation
intolerance to saltier water and the availability of reuse volume for dilution purposes.
Also the possible gradual buildup of salts in the areas of discharge may become a
problem. See Figure 1.
UAB Response:
The UAB believes this option in conjunction with other possible options will be the
most immediate and viable means of diverting; concentrate from the North County
plant and current discharge point. A pilot study ata nearby golf course pond is
recommended prior to full scale implementation.
3.6 Disposal to North VV VTP
The North County WWTP is a one million gallon per day wastewater treatment plant
See Figure 2. The concentrate could be diverted to the plant, mixed with the influent,
and treated and disposed as the North plant's effluent. The plant would only be able
to take a portion of the 600,000 gallons per day of concentrate produced at North
County facility. The rest of the concentrate would have to be disposed in another
manner.
UAB Response:
The UAB recommended not to pursue this option at the May 4 meeting since salts
pass through the treatment process.
CDM Camp LNtwr & stcx.e ins.
ro nl d 11116M
40
4D
•
SJRWMD Alternative Water Supplies Construction Cost Sharing Application Dorm 2000-24111
C. Supporting Materials. Attach the following items to this application farm. (Additional information
may be requested if needed.)
I. project budget summary. provide a one-page project budget summary listing project
expenses by major categories.
2. General specifications and plans. Submit a generalized sketch with enough
detail that the evaluating committee will understand what is to be constructed
grid a one-page written stuninary of sizes and capacities of the project and major
components. 'Fit all drawings on It %z" b►• l 1" paper. Detailed engineering plans
may be requested later if needed for further project evaluation. Do not send
color graphics unless they will reproduce satistactorily in black and white.
3. Location map. Indicate the location and extent of the project and whether �✓
it crosses water management district jurisdictions. Use an Y ''/3" by
I l" fonnat. Shown highway intersections or other recognizable landmarks
for orientation. The may may be a photocopy of part of a county road reap
or USGS topographic map. Do not send color graphics unless they will
reproduce satisfactorily in black and white.
D. Interdistrict impacts. If the proposed project crosses wvater management district NIA
boundaries or serves more than one water management district., provide a ane -nage
summary of the effects that fire project will have on water resources and water
users within each district. Include the following information, at a minimum.
■ State the amount(s) ofwvater that will be transported across fire district boundary
• Identify die locality from which the water wwill be taken
R Identify die utility and/or users who will receive the water
E. Utilities Only. The Florida Legislature requires utilities receiving, finds through this program to meet
several specific conditions concerning rates, consistency with comprehensive plans, and requiring
mandatory hookups to public reuse distribution systems. in order for SJRWMD to assess whether
individual utilities meet the legislative requirements, utility applicants must attach the following items to
their applications.
I. [late schedules. A copy of the rate schedule for each water, wastewater, and �✓
reclaimed water utility service operated by the applicant in the service area
where the proposed project is located.
2. Certification of compatibility with local comprehensive plan. A letter from
the local city or county land use planning; authority, certifying that the project is
consistent with the local comprehensive plan (Do not include plan excerpts.)
3. Reuse Ordinance. (government operated utilities only) A copy of an ordinance
that requires water users to take reclaimed water where available and appropriate
for thcir use.
Signature of person with authority to enter into a contractual agreement.
I certif th�t all infarti oryliis far�rri and attached documents is true and correct.
Name jl Title Chairman, MLC 94"l-
irvJ�rn A�'sv
Fran R. Adams
12-05-00
Page A - G
+FlFlF7F}^p]I AtM1M-IC IL.Sa Lq LR 1'kN9PR]R4N717�„w � 1 �4tr1 [b.nsrwa P.avn Ut+r Itiv� C�vry . nf.ns,:. W w
�w'Iw..IWrIx.
40
4b
Mixing Concentrate with Reclaimed Water Budget Estimate
PILOT PLANT
MATERIAL AND LABOR $100,000.00
ENGINEERING, PERMITTING AND LAB WORK $100,000.00
CONSTRUCTION SUB -TOTAL $ 200,000.00
15% CONTINGENCY $ 30,000.00
TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATE $ 230,000.00
40
4D
40
d ®
A§
.
-$m
mm
�]
rn
e-3
Mi
E:
C-1
40
40
411111111
OD
40
4199reso.uG1rale5Vk
RESOLUTION NO. 99» 58
A RESOLUTION OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA,
ADOPTING RATES, FEES, AND CHARGES FOR THE
DEPARTMENT OF UTILITY SERVICES, PURSUANT TO THE
AUTHORITY OF ORDINANCE NO. 91-9.
WHEREAS, Indian River County operates a Department of Utility Services, which
is funded without contribution from the ad valorem tax fund of the County and is required
to support itself from rates, fees, and charges paid by the customers of the utility system;
and
WHEREAS, Ordinance No. 91-9 authorizes the imposition by the Department of
Utility Services of certain rates, fees, and charges to support the operation of the
Department in a fair and equitable manner; and
WHEREAS, Ordinance No. 92-35 requires an annual review of user charges and
notice of rates; and
WHEREAS, it is necessary to amend the existing rate resolution to keep the
Department of Utility Services on a sound financial footing;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that:
1. The Schedule of Rates, Fees, and Charges described on Exhibit "A" is hereby
adopted for use by the Department of Utility Services effective October 1, 1999.
2. Rates, fees, and charges will be reviewed on an annual basis beginning one year
from the effective date of this resolution.
The resolution was moved for adoption by Commissioner Q i and the
motion was seconded by Commissioner T i p p i n and, upon being put to a vote,
the vote was as follows:
Chairman Kenneth R. Macht Aye
Vice Chairman Fran B. Adams Aye
Commissioner John W. Tippin Aye
Commissioner Ruth M. Stanbridge Aye
Commissioner Caroline D. Ginn Aye
r
The Chairman thereupon declared the resolution duly passed and adopted this
22nddayof June 1999.
BOARD OF UNTY C MISSIONEFtS
IN DI IVER COUN FLORIDA
Atte J, K. Barton, Cie[
fcyzcti Ken'eth R. Macht
PA7CF�0 N'%DGF-Ly r Chairman
Attachment: Exhibit "A"
4
C"!s r I , ' I 1
40
Indian River Coun
ORA -
I
Department of Utility Servkes
Schedule of Water and Sewer Rates,
Fees and Oftier Charges
Effective October 1, 1999
. WHIT "Aar
•
•
SCHEDULE OF WATER AND SEWER RA'Z'ES, FEES AND CHARGES
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
Water
Billing Charge Per Account S1.29
Base Facllity Charge:
Where Lines Ars Available -
Single -Family (per ERU) S7.76
Manufactured Home 0.85 (per ERU) S6.60
Multi -Family 0.85 (per ERU) $6.60
Commercial (per ERU) 57.76
Base Facility Charge:
Capacity is Reserved But Where Lines Are Not Available -
Single -Family (per ERU)
S3.88
Manufactured Home 0.85 (per ERU)
53.30
Multi -Family 0.85 (per ERU)
$3.30
Commercial (per ERU)
53.88
0 to 3,000 Gallons Per Month Per Connection -
Per 1,000 Gallons
$2.20
3,001 to 7,000 Gallons per Month Per Connection -
Per 1,000 Gallons
$2.42
Over 7,000 Gallons Per Month Per Connection -
Per 1,000 Gallons
53.85
Greater than 13,060 Gallons Per Month Per ERU -
Per 1,000 Gallons
57.70
Sewer
Billing Charge - Per Account
51.29
Base Facility Charge Where Lines Are Available -
Single -Family (per ER1J)
S14.58
Manufactured Home 0.85 (per ERU)
S12.40
Multi -Family 0.85 (per ERU)
512.40
Commercial (per ERU)
5141.58
Base Facilities Charge Where Capacity is Reserved But Lines Are Not Available -
Ssngle-Family (per ERU)
S7.29
Manufactured Home 0.85 (per ERU)
56.20
Multi -Family 0.85 (per ERIJ)
56.20
Commercial (per ERU)
57.29
Volume Charge Per 1,000 Gallons -12,000 Gallons Per Month Maximum for
Single -Fancily &. Manufactured Hames, individual meters
S2.86
Multi -Family Master -metered & Commercial
i
0 to 13,000 Gallons - billed water flow
52.86
Above 13,000 Gallons - billed water now
54.29
40
OP
40
SCHEDULE OF WATER AND SEWER RATES, FEES AND CHARGES
Bulk Water
Billing Charge - Per Account Per Month
$1.29
Buse Facility Charge Where Lines are Avallable
- Per ERU
$6.19
Base Facility Charge Where Capacity is Reserved.
But lines arc not Available - Per ERU
53.10
Volume Charge - per 1,0011 gallons Water Meter Basis
$2.63
Excess Volume Surcharge - Greater (lien 7600 gallons per month -
Per ERU'
*Surcharge for bulk users will apply to flow exceeding total capacity
reserved by bulk user in all meters.
54.45
Bulk Sewer
Billing Charge -Per Account Per Month
$1.29
Base Facility Charge Where lines are Available
Per ERU
S13.41
Base Facility Charge Where Capacity is Reserved,
But Lines are not Available - Per ERU
56.71
Volume Charge - per 1,400 gallons Water Mctcr Basis
$2.63
Volume Charge - per 1,000 gallons Sewer Meter Basis
$2.95
Excess Volume Surcharge - Greater than 7600 gallons per month -
Per ERU"
*Surcharge far bulk users will apply to flow exceeding total
capacity reserved by bulk user in all meters.
S4.45
Excess Sewago Strength Charge
Selvage Charge X Ratio of Total
Dissolved Solids or Biochemical
Oxygen Demand in Milligrams
per lilerf250.
Excess Sewage Strength Charge Applicable to Customers
Required to Use Greasetraps but who ]rave obtained a
Variance due to hardship or financial unfeasibility Sewage Charge "
Reclaimed water - per 1.000 daltons S 0.15
Slud a and Se to a Rates(b)
Charge per 1,000 gallons(a) $30.82
Charge per wet ton(a) S 7.51
Notes!
(a) Recommended rates assume domestic sludge with solids
concentrations of between .5 and 2.0 percent.
(b) Costs incurred by County to sample, monitor and/or test wastes
to verify solids concentrations, mctab, content, etc. or additional
costs incurred to handle or dispose of wastes with high metal
concentrations or other nondomes0c waste characteristics should he
recovered from the users discharging the wastes In addition to the
above charges based on formula's available in the Department of Utility Services.
i
46
•
SCHEDULE OF WATER AND SEWER RATES, FEES AND CHARGES
!�AFACITY CHARGE
Water - Per FRU
Water Treatment
$ 320.00
Water Transmission95
80.Q0
Total
51,3110.110
Sewer _-Per ERU
Wastewater Treatment
$2,087.00
Wastewater Transmission
S 709.00
Total
52,746.00
Line Extension Charves
Main Extension -►Vater
Per foot measured along front of property served.
511.25
Main Extension Sewer and Sewer Laterals
Per root measured along front or property served.
$15.77
(Note: Charge doubles 1f sel-►rice available on one side only,
minimum of 50 feet per ERU, maximum of loo feet per ERU)
OTHER CHARGES
Deposits - Required Upon opening, Transferrine orReconnectine Service
Residential and Commercial - Per ERU
S 50.00
Hydrant Meter
5345.00
Interest Rate paid on Deposits
.00208% per month.
2.5% per year
Charge for Returned Check
S20,00
Issuance of Duplicate Bill
S 1.50
Sewer Tap
Cost plus overhead
Meter Replacement
518 Inch
5100.00
I Inch
S125.00
1-1/2 Inc".
5300.00
2 Inch or larger
Cost plus overhead
Meter Removal
SIB Inch
S 30.00
1 Inch
S30.00
1 112 Inch and larger
S 40.00
Water Service Connection
518 Inch Meter
5400.00
1 Inch Meter
5460.00
1-1/2 Inch Meter
5810.00
Larger than 1-112 Inch Meter
Cost plus overhead
40
40
SCHEDULE OF WATER AND SEWER RATES, FEES AND CHARGES
Scorer Service Con�
$500.00
Residential
Cost plus overhead
Commercial and Other
Cost plus overhead
Paved Road Cuts
(5200 tnlnimum)
Road Jacking and Haring
Cost plus overhead
(5200.011 minitnutn)
Cost plus overhead
Grass Restoration
Unauthorized use of Fire Hydrants
S115.00
Other and Extraordinary Services
Cost plus overhead
Meter Installation
5130.00
518 Inch Meter
1 Inch Meter
5250.00
1-112 Inch Meter
$500.00
Cost plus overhead
2 inch Meter
Cost plus overhead
3 Inch Meter and larger
Fire Ilydrant Meter
S25.00
Water Service Reconnection
525,00
during Working Boors
After Working flours
535.00
Meter Rereads and Leak Inspection
520.00
Delinquency Charge
S2.00 plus 1.5% per
month
Ceneral Service Calls
Cost plus overhead
Meter Test
525.00
118 Inch Meter
I Inch Meter
525.00
1-1/2 Inch Meter or larger
Cost plus Overhead
Damage Repair
Cust plus overhead
Line Location w
Cost plus overhead
En inecrin Service
Site Pian Review - Under 40 Units and Without Lift Station
Cost plus overhead
(S50.00 minimum)
Site Plan Review - Over 40 Units and With Lift Station
Cast per overhead
(SI50.00 minimum)
Inspection Fee..
Wager Per Connection S 25.00 (550.00 after hours)
Sewer Per Connection S 25.00 (550.00 after hours)
Hydrant Slow Test S60.00
4
•
•
SCHEDULE OF WATER AND SEWER RATES, FEES AND CHARGES
Fire Protection C s e - per hydrantlycar S170.00
Utility Master Plan Revisions required by requested changes to the Indian
River County Comprehensive Plan shall be paid by the Applicant
requesting the change. Cost plus overhead
FRANCHISE C Ali ES
Application Fees
Establish Franchise
Franchise Name Charge
Franchise Territory Charge
Cbange of ownersbip:
49 ERU's or Fewer
50 ERU's or More
Rate Hearing:
49 ERU's or Fewer
50 ERU's or More
Public Hearing
JSIs m n
schedutelmsw
5
r
Cost plus overhead
S 50.00 minimum
Cost plus overhead
$1,100.00 minimum
Cost Plus overhead
5115.00 minimum
Cost plus overhead
S115.00 minimum
Cost Plus overhead
$115.00 minimum
Cost plus overhead
S300.00 minimum
Cost plus overhead
$300.00 minimum
Cost plus overhead
$575.00 minimum
Cost plus overhead
S115.00 minimum
4b
•
40
Telephone: 15611557.OrM
October 30, 2000
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
1840 25th Street, Vero Reach, Florida 32960
Stan Browning
Water Use Specialist II
5t. Johns River Water Mangement District
F.O. Box 1429
Palatka, FL 32178-1429
RE: COMBINE R.O. BRINE WATER WITH REUSE WATER
Dear Mr. Browning:
The purpose of this letter is to express Community Development's support for the above -referenced
project. The referenced project conforms with Objective 4 of the County's Comprehensive Plan -
Sanitary Sewer Sub -Element by providing more reclaimed water to existing and future developments
requiring irrigation.
Should you have any questions, please contact this office at (561) 567-8000, ext. 247.
Sincerewl�
r�
John Wachtel
Senior Planner
cc: Robert M. Keating, AICD, Community Development Director
Stan Boling, AICP, Planning Director
Sasan Rohani, AICP, Chief, Long -Range Planning
ulvljlmccain l .ltr
V
SM717ARY SEWER AND POTABLE WATER REGULATIONS § 918.04
CHAPTER 918, SANITARY SEWER AND
POTABLE WATER REGULATIONS
Sec. 918.61.
Short title.
Sec. 918.62.
Purpose and intent.
Sec. 918.63.
Del)nitiorm
Sec. 918.074.
Sanitary sewer and pouahfe water regulctiona.
Sec. 918.05,
Water and waatewater connection
requirements for new development
Section 918.111. Short title.
This chapter shall be known as the "Sanitary
Sewer and Potable Water Regulations Ordinance."
(Ord. No. 90.16, § 1, 9.11.90)
Section 918.02. PurpoBe and intent.
The purpose of this chapter is to provide for the
implementation of the land development related
policies of the sanitiuy sewer and potable water
sub -elements of the comprehomive plan. Other
policies of the sanitary sewer and potable water
sub -elements requiring ordinances for implemen•
Cation will be included in the utilities ordinance
in Title I1 of the Code of Laws and Ordinances. In
the case of duplication between the provisions of
this chapter and the utilities ordinance in the Title
11, the provisions of the utilities ordinance will
govern.
(Ord. No. 90.16, § 1, 9-11.90)
Section 918,03. Definitions.
All terms defined in Chapter 901, definitions,
are applicable in this chapter.
(Ord. No. 90.16, § 1, 9-11.90)
Section 918.04. Sanitary sewer and potable
seater regulattons.
(1) Single-family dwelling units and nonresi-
dr,ntial projects utilizing less than two thousand
(2,000) gallons of potable water per day may use
private wells where such wells are approved by
regulatory agencies including the county environ•
mental health department and utilities depart-
ment, in aeoordance with the connection regular•
tions set out in section 918.115 below.
(2) Single-family dwelling units and nonresi-
dential projects generating less than two thou.
sand (2,000) gallons of wastewater per dray may
utilize septic tanks for disposal of domestic waste
supe. No. 5
only, where those septic tanks are approved by
the county environmental health and utilities de-
partments, and where consistent with the connec-
tion regulations set out in section 918.05 below.
(3) When effluent reuse is required and per.
r itted by the department of environmental reg-
ulation and the county utilities department, de-
velopers of projects having open space areas
utilizing or projected to utilize ten thousand
(10,000) gallons or more water per day on a peak
day for irrigation, including golf courses, parks,
medians, and other such areas, which are located
within a county utility department service area
and are within one voile of the nearest effluent
line containing irrigation quality effluent, shall
construct effluent re -use lines on-site and effluent
re -use lines off-site to connect to treated waste-
water to be used for spray irrigation of the open
space areas within the development project.
Such large volume irrigation users shall be re-
quired to take re -use water for spray irrigation.
The effluent re -use lines constructed for treated
wastewater shall be dedicated to Indian River
County.
Developments located more than one mile from
the nearest irrigation quality effluent line and
having open space areas requiring irrigation shall
install dry lines if they are within the county util-
ities department service area and irrigation
duality effluent water is or will be available for
re -use.
(4) Regional potable water service will be lim-
ited to the service areas shown on Figures 2.8.7,
3.13.£3, and 3.13.9 of the potable water sub -element
of the Indian River County Comprehensive Plan,
and to areas where the county has legal commit-
ments to provide facilities and services a, of Feb.
ruary 13, 1990.
91811
Regional sanitary sewer service will be limited
to the service areas Shawn on Figures 3.A.8, 3.A.9,
and 3.A.10 of the sanitary sewer sub -element of
the Indian River County Comprehensive flan, and
to areas where the county has legal commitments
to provide facilities and services as of February
13, 19.90.
(5) filo existing on-site wastewater treatment
8yatema or water treatment systems may be re.