Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2000-367/ _ APPNUM 01 SIRW MD office Use ST. JOHNS RIVER WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT ALTERNATIVE WATER SUPPLY CONSTRUCTION COST SHARING APPLICATION FORM FY 2000-2001 Submission deadline: Applications must be received by SIRWMD or dated by the US Postal Service or a commercial carrier no later than Friday, December 8, 2000. Submit 3 copies of this form and all supporting materials to Stan Browning, St. Johns River Water Management District, P,O. Box 1429, Palatka, FL, 32178- 1429 if sent by U.S, mail. Appl'icat'ions sent by courier should be addressed to 4049 Reid Street, Palatka, FL, 32178-1429. For application assistance contact Stmt Browning at 904-3294321 or star brotitininglar district -sjnvmzd. state. fl.us. You may, add up to one additional page of supporting material for any answer tltat needs further explanation. Applications which are substantially incomplete or not completed according to instructions will he disqualified. Excess materials will not be considered. Read and follow instructions! Type or print clearly the requested information in the spaces provided. A, Applicant Information 1. Name of Applicant: Indian Riv r Coun%Utihtiq-s- DeMnent (May be utility, local govcmment, agency, company, individual, or other.) 2. Name, address, and phone numbers of project manager or contact person. SJRWMD will sent correspondence concerning this application ONLY to this person. Name Michael C. Hotchkiss P.E. Mailing address 1940 25"' Street _ City and zip code Vero Beach FL 32960 Phone (561) 567-8009, ext. 1821 FAX (561) 770-5143 (include arc code) (include area code) 3. Name, address, and phone numbers of person with authority to enter into a contractual agreement, if other than project manager or contact person. %lame - Fran_B. Adams. Chain nmt, IndianRiverCounty Board ofCounty _Commissioners Mailing address 1840 25" Street _. City and zip code Vero Beach, FL 32460 Phone (561) 567.8000, oxt. 1830 FAX (561) 770-5143 (include area code) (include area code) Page A - rM1IbR19]IRMk'r'LL. vrll�t-1]r[iL1.VUYfi H�M1wa•1.ifh lLu�n vw�w.i.4➢ �Rnw gown Al..nb;. W—. .14r1 1.0,Ap/b�,.1AAIM U"—W. PS.skx • f 40 SJRWMD Alternative Water Supplies Construction Cost Sharing Application form 2000-2001 4. SJRWMD Permit Information. Does the applicant have any SJRWMD permits? Yes r-0_ No If yes, list all SJRWMD consumptive use porniits held by the applicant AND any surface; water man-.%emcnt or environmental resource permits pertaining to the project. Attach an additional page behind this page if needed. Permit Number Expiration Date Penn it Number Expiration Date 2-161-0106NGN1211 12-31-98 _(*) * - Renewal Pennit Anticipated Issuance Date Janumy 2001) 5. Other Permit Information. List all types of permits required to construct the proposed project and provide the status of efforts to obtain each permit. Tvnc of Permit Issuing Agency P Have, Permit Applied_ Not Applied Utility Construction F.D.E.P. _ rr Rini gh� Indian River County is f Utility Construction_ Indian River Count} >! 6. Disclosure. Does any SJRWMD employee, Governing Board member, contractor or other affiliate of the applicant have a financial interest in this project, the property associated with [iris project or wrlh any party that may profit financially form this project'? Yes No --W-- If i!.___If yes, identify all such parties and describe their interests. Page A - 2 ,xsa�xrv�naxV.�.ru�Rfly.,�t+oarx�mHwna-i+iy rL.w,.-.sre.s�e....i•,sq hn...e.rwr.s�M,�t.,�.an+.amnws.,au.wn•w�.. e,,,�, Ny�a�. ws.f„*�aR. nc, 0 8. Project Information 1. Cost sharing request (S]RWMD's share cannot exceed 50%n of total project cost.) a, Total project cost.............................................................—S _573,600 b. Amount of cost share requested ........................ . ....................... $ $36,800 500/6), 2. Purpose. Explain the purpose(s) of the project. (Do not rcFer to attachments.) Increase efficiency af_trLatttacnt process byg grad'ang 1i.0. nrcmbrancs in ardor toproduce more potable Water and reduce (lie _gtrarttity of R.O. coiicrntratc ucncrated. 3. Brief description of project. Include approximate dimensions and capacities. (Do not refer to attachments.) Reverse Osmosis R.O. water treatment process involves micron level filtration_ thatencrates a waste stream hyproduct referred to as concentrate. Currently, concentrate_ is dischars'cd to the Indian_ River where it is commingled with the waters of the intra coastal waterwa and disposed. A thirds a R.O. mcmbranc Will be added to increase diepermeate production from 80% to 90%, thus rcducJpg the amount of R O concentrate (reelect water) discharged from 750,000 gpd to 375,000 gpd, resulting in a nei eduction in the quantity of Rd concentrate dischaWd to the River. Tine third sk, a R.O. membrane cold also result in an additional 441UUU pd of blended notable %v ter available for supply. This phase of the project will involve constructing ain lot plant and analyzing water quality to detenn'snc if larec scale imMementation is feasible Approximately 1,000 lineal Net or 4 -inch diameter transmission main will be requircd to transport the,RO concentrate from an active transmission RQ Conecrntratc main to the County's N rth Regimi l Wastewater Facility_where die pilot plant will be located. The pilot plant will be designed toyioducc; approximately 4,6(H) gallons per dAy of pcnncatc. EVALUATION FACTOR related to questions 2 and 3. Will the project implement new or innovative procedures or technology, which can serve as a demonstration, pilot project, or source of useful data for water resource nnulagemcnt? 1-10 points. Based on rater :s as.sessnnesnl of the degree of innovariann bring proposed or the wiiity ref data generated by the pro jeer, with greater innovation or usefidrness of data gelling more ixninrs. 4. Project location (location or description): The County's North Regional R.O. WMcr Treatment Facility is located -at he norhwest corner of 58'h Ave, and 77h St. The third stage R.O. nnembrane Rilot plant will be installed at the Count •'s North. Regional WWTF located on 77'" St. approximately 1 -mile cast of 5e Ave. County (ics) in which project is located: Indian River Page A - 3 �uunss itiuY���r sna.wsvFnun�ran«rme,n t+� n.wwn..swua w�,. u.. r�..g ..Vr.r.. w�.e aM+r nr.a.. u..aai ha., ner..apr. wra v,y�, M.w�•.si s,ar!.ad... fw+ oS.eaa� 40 0 i 5]RWMD Alternative. Water Supplies Construction Cost Sharing Application Foran 2000-2001 EVALUATION FACTOR related to question. 4. Is the project in an arca identified by the S]RWMD Water Supply Assessment as a priority waver resource caution area or a. delineated arca? `Ibis will be determined for you by SJRWMD staff. 0-5 points. Yes, Inside carrlion area = 5. Yes, Inside delineated area m 3,° No, O nlside caution area andlor delineated area = 0. S. Projected schedule Projected starting date: mo. _lung yr. 2001. Completion date: mo. lana _ yr. 2042_. (Funds received through this program may be used only for projects constructed after a cost sharing contract has been executed and may not be used to reimburse the cost of existing structures or structures alreadv under construction. Cost sharing contracts probably will be executed in April or May 200 1). 6. Will water from this project directly take the place of an existing or proposed withdrawal from a higher quality water source?.................................................................. yes W__ No If yes, identify the source and quantity of higher duality water to be replaced. Floridan aquifer ............. yes ✓ no 160.6_ million gallons ner year Surficial aquifer ........... yes no V, _ million gallons per year Surface water .............. yes no rte' million gallons per year If surface water, state name of water body EVALUATION FACTOR related to question 6. Will water from this project directly and cticctiveiy take the place of an existing or proposed higher quality water source? 0-20 points. Based on rater :s assessment of the effectiveness gf'the projuer at saving potable wider and apparent relative carr effiedivermys. Because rf the great variation in types oj'prc�fecrs, calcidations oj'cost effeetivenessJbr widely dissinfilar priujects, Brach as turban reirse and agricultural freeze protection ponds will nal be compared. 7. Does the project provide other water resource; benefits in addition to water supply, such as improving or protecting ground or surface water quality, increasing recharge or conserving water? Yes rf No -- If yes, then describe benefits'? You may add one page attachment behind Ibis page if necessary. Constructing a third stagg.RAL membra:ic will result in a net reduction of approximately 375,OOO-GPiD less concentrate � unleased tothe lndiarr River. EVALUA'T'ION FACTOR related to question 7. Does the project provide other water resource benefits in addition to water supply, such as improving or protecting ground or surface water quality, increasing recharge or conserving water? 0-10 paints. Based on rater 's assessment gI-the extent and significance ref additional benefits. fags A - a ♦413lAh1ilRiY Y'A YYrAh�IIM1]r{IClB,AlIAiH„w►i'YIIry(yrnAma4F++A•.•—IY.r1'nwryhlrna..akr 5pll14.uxursYiy.RlMn kl.a,rrw4. Yq,/, Ay,Mrt.a.WSL{.,. PW 11.11. • 40 SJRWMD Alterative Water Supplies Construction Cost Sharing Application From 2000-2001 8-a. Is the project necessary to meet an environmental regulatory requirement of a local, regional, state, or fcdcrtl govcmmcnt agency?..................................................Yes t/ No If yes, identify the sgencM° and regulatory progrun. F A E P -Red Dunt of R.d. concentrate water discharge to the. IndianRiver I agoon , S -b. Is the project being undertaken in response to enforcement actions taken against the applicant because of failure to comply with permit conditions or other regulations? ................Yes Y'� No If yes, name the agency and regulatory program, F.D.E.P. - N.P.D.E.S. EVALUATION FACTOR related to question S. Is the project voluntary or is it necessary to comply with cnviroinncntal regulations requirement of a local, state or federal government agency; or an enforcement action by such an agency? 0-10 points. Vohinlary = 10: Regulatory compliance = raters assesstneni 0-9: Egffircement action = 0. 9. is the current application for subsequent funding to a phased multi-year project previously funded under this prograim? ...................... . ..........................................................Yes No ►/ if yes, was the previous phase indicated to be a part of a multi-year project at the time of application?......................................................................................Yes No Is the proposed project part of a master water or wastewater pian? ......................Yes rOO No If yes, attach a copy of relevant pagc(s) of the plan behind this page. 10. Is this project a cooperative effort with one or more other organizations or agencies, other their die applicant and SJRWMA?...................................................................Yes Y No If yes, list other participants. You may add a one page attachment behind this page if neccssary^. Indian River CouM is working in conjuncti n with the Cit of Vero Beach to achieve the same means. EVALUATION FACTOR related to question 9. Is the project a cooperative effort with one or more other organizations, agencies, or governmental entities'? t-1 [1 points. Based on rater"s• assessment g1'rhe level and signfficanev of-sugliort provided by other parties. svi(h greater support getting more points. OTHER EVALUATION FACTORS I. Rata's evaluation. 0-10 points, hater's overall assessment and other relevant ,,tactors not specr'/ically addressee' elsewhere. 2. Has the applicant followed directions as instructed in preparing the application? Points will be deducted from the applicant's score for noncompliance: including the inclusion of a large amount of unueccssary^ information. (-S)-O mageA - S �tuafxSta Ts.'A.�-tv..v, LflXf`A1c371rhaftaw iVw, ,ax.arw MMm1 "-- �,..r�,.o-�t^w..swlnsw�rpe cv..ena.. Lxyt�hAn •foaewr »PSA„4x+.eafW.... F.F��.v strew i W 40 Introduction/Overview Indian River County operates two water treatment facilities. Both facilities obtain raw water from the Floridan Aquifer. This raw water requires treatment in order to meet Federal Safe Drinking Water Act regulations. Indian River County utilizes state-of- the-art membrane technology to remove undesirable constituents, mineral impurities, and/or organic compounds. 'Both the South and North County facilities incorporate nanofiltration membranes to remove undesirable particles in the raw water such as bacteria, algea, clays, silts, cysts, Giardia, Cryptosporidium, viruses, hardness, sodium, and chlorides. Nanofiltration is a low-pressure process that also softens the water and removes disinfectant by-products. Approximately eighty percent (80%) of the groundwater obtained from the raw water well systems is recovered in tate membrane process and used in the potable drinking water system. The remainder, approximately twenty percent (20%) of the raw water obtained from the well systems, is regulated by the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) and termed concentrate. The concentrate flow is treated at each facility by disinfection (chlorine injection), air injection and static mixing. Hydrogen sulfide and chlorine are removed prior to discharge to disposal. Concentrate from the South County plant is discharged to the South Relief Canal, a Class III water body, which flows into the Indian River, a Class III marine water body. The North County plant discharges directly to the Indian River, a Class III marine water body, at the County Road 510 bridge. For comparison purposes, total dissolved solids in well water and concentrate are typically 700 and 3,500 mg/1, respectively. Salinity of the Indian River Lagoon and Atlantic Ocean are typically 20,000 and 35,000 mg/i, respectively. Discharges from both facilities are monitored and analyzed routinely according to FDEP permit requirements. Indian River County is currently in the process of renewing the concentrate disposal permits at both facilities. The Environmental Protection Agency has been reviewing discharges such as these and is currently formulating legislation regarding this issue. FDEP and water management districts are currently struggling with the issue throughout the state. Indian River County, in keeping with their mission statement: "to utilize aU water resources in a sustainable and cost-effective manner", authorized Camp Dresser & McKee Inc. (CDM) on December 7, 1999 to review current sampling efforts and investigate alternative disposal options. The County hopes that this report may result in conservation of our valuable resources. CDWs work authorization and report are broken down as follows: Section 1: Existing Treatment System/ Issues Section 2: Existing Water [duality Data/Techniques Section 3: Alternative Disposal Options Section 4: Concentrate Team Meetings Section 5: Recommendations CDM Camp Drcwt & &Wcc Inc. 171 f hthan River Cc unty Uf ifi"es Concentrate Disposal Op6ans UAB Response. The UAB recommended against this option at the May 4, 2000 meeting as it does not remove or divert discharge from the Indian River. 3.10 Modification of Discharge Point The discharge ,point could be modified by installing a tee with diffuser legs on the outfall. The modified outfall would cause the concentrate to be less concentrated by discharging over a greater area. This is a low cost solution but may be influenced by the tides which dcfine'ttie water velocity in the Indian River Lagoon at die County Road 510 Causeway. UAB Response: The UAB recommended against this option on May 4, 2000 as it does not remove or divert discharge from the Indian River. 3.11 Mixing in Discharge pipe Mixing in the discharge pipe is similar to the mixing zone / ion imbalance solution above. Water from the Indian River Lagoon would be pumped into the existing concentrate pipe and blended before being discharged into the receiving water. This would dilute the concentrate with river water so the ion imbalance would be greatly reduced at the discharge point. The mixing would render the effluent tolerable to the indicator species used in the toxicity testing. The use of this solution would require the construction of a pump station to draw in the proper amount of river water in proportion to the concentrate being disposed. The -river water would then be thoroughly mixed using a static in line mixer to bring the ions in solution closer to the ratios found in the river. Toxicity testing samples would be taken at the discharge point. UAB Response: The UAB recommended against this option on May 4 as it does not remove or divert discharge from the Indian giver. 3.12 Additional Membrane Stage A third membrane stage would reduce the volume of concentrate to be discharged. Since the concentration of the ions in the reject water is much lower than that of the receiving water, increasing the concentration of ions would decrease the amount of receiving water required to bring the mixture into balance. A third stage would provide better quality finished water. The increased finish water quaiity would allow a greater amount of bypass water to be blended with the finish water. The higher concentration of salts in the brine would also have the effect of reducing the amount of concentrate flow to the river. A third stage would increase the ion concentration to those closer to the concentrations found in the receiving water. CDM Camp D,ewr&',IcKce Inc M3M1j9.11Aam 40 • r Indian River Counly Uia`iitles Concentrate Disposal Options The plant currently has a recovery rate of 80 percent. If the recovery is increased to 90 percent through the addition of a third stage, the amount of concentrate decreases from 0.6 million gallons per day (MGD) to 0.3 MGD. The blend water could be increased and allow the plant to be increased. The resultant concentrate would be twice as concentrated. UAB Response: The UAB advised that this option should be investigated in the future but should not be included as the immediate solution. CDM recommends conducting a pilot study to identify the possible impacts of the concentrated effluent. 3.13 Injection Well Disposal Injection well disposal would require one or two injection wells to be installed to approximately 3000 feet for the injection of the concentrate. The wells are costly to install, require injection pumps (energy costs), and must be maintained. The wells also require FDEP permitting and would have to be located in an area that would not adversely affect the aquifer from which the water treatment plant draws. UAB Response: The UAB recommended not pursuing this option further at the May 4 meeting. 3.14 Industrial Use Disposal Concentrate may be used as industrial process water in citrus packing plants as wash water. Agreements and arrangements would have to be made between the users of the concentrate and the County. Reliability of the discharge would be uncertain because of the seasonal nature of the business. County roads department have also expressed an interest to utilize concentrate for dust control on area dirt roads. Another industrial user may be the proposed Calpine power plant to be constructed on 741+ Avenue. The concentrate may be mixed with other water for their cooling water needs. UAB Response: The UAB, while not eliminating these options, voiced concerns at the'May 4 meeting regarding the viability based on a limited industrial demand for the concentrate. CIM C mry Chr r&JWK"Inc. soma n�,y� 10 i C] S7kWMI) Alternative Water Supplies Construction Cost Sharing Application Fomu 2000-2001 C. Supporting. Materials. Attach the following items to this application forret. (Additional information may be requested if needed.) 1. Project budget summary. Provide a one-pn e- project budget summary listing project expenses by major categories. 2. General specifications and plans. Submit a generalized sketch with enough detail that the evaluating committee will understand what is to be constnictcd and a one-page written summary of sizes and capacities of the project and major components. Fit all drawings on 8'/t' by l I" paper. Detailed engineering plans may be requested later if needed For further project evaluation. Do not send color graphics unless they will reproduce satisfactorily in black and white. 3. Location map. Indicate the location and extent of tluc project and whether it crosses water management district jurisdictions. Use an 8 %s,. by I l" format. Show highway intersections or other recogni7ablc landmarks for orienttation.'I7rc may, may be a photocopy of part of a county road Wrap or USGS topographic map. Do not send color graphics unless they will rcproduce satisfactorily in black and white. D. Interdistrict impacts. If the proposed project crosses water management district boundaries or serves more than one water management district, provide a oue-naee summary of the effects that the project will have on water resources and water users within each district. Include the following information, at a minimum. • State the amount(s) of water that will be transported across the district boundary • Identify the locality from which the water will be taken • Identify the utility and/or users who will receive the water 0 10 a NJA E. Utilities Only. 'the Florida Legislature requires utilities receiving funds through this program to meet several specific conditions concerning rates, consistency with comprehensive planus, and requiring mandatory Hookups to public muse distribution systems. In order for S]RWMD to assess whether individual utilities meet the legislative requirements, utility applicants must attach [lie following items to their applications. 1. Rate schedules. A copy of die rate schedule for each water, wastewater, and reclaimed water utility service operated by the applicant in the service area where the proposed project is located. 2. Certification of compatibility with local comprehensive plant. A letter from �✓ the local city or county land use planning authority, certifying that the project is consistent with the local comprehensive plan (Do not include plan excerpts.) 3. Reuse Ordinance. (government operated utilities only) A copy of an ordinance that requires water users to take rcclaimed water when: available and appropriate for their use. Signature of person with authority to enter into a contractual agreement. I certify that all inform r=on =his and attached documents is true and correct. Meme CltA-A- Title _Chairmatu. i R.[.'.B.C.C. Date 12-05-06 Fran R. Adatss � - .,: n,nn.rU i.7 P Aim n Page A - G r:agnl t Di ,FYnra�nrrva.K•�wee i7r3rrtvenmawr»,p.r•+�e�w++wwr.=.n.. ra.M«Cr7.Mr.a=w••rdr.. w ,� utiline 14�1 40 4w �011= 31x1 Stage R.O. Memtxane Pilot Plant Budget Estimate MATERIAL $ 15,800.00 LABOR $ 5,200.00 UTILITIY TRAILER $ 8,000.00 ENGINEERING, PERMITTING AND LAB WORK $ 35,000.00 CONSTRUCTION SUB -TOTAL $ 64,000.00 15% CONTINGENCY $ 9,600.00 PILOT PLANT TOTAL $ 73,600.00 No E r o 0) m ,o 0 0 ffY C! o n m c.l N qp C w m oCD m m m O.-g. -P 3 "g. 00 n o G 0 ID 6 � d ID to 7 m O O N @ r CL m 3a v m 3 m m w ® 3 o v w rr m C] o m CL � 'n o 1p c eti u m {I To CD rCd 7 D 0 am o.m M to m M o m e x 3 a (D v n " m © n C sa Q b U1 N N R � to n 4] �� um IJ A01 13 S ro fG P 3 0 J O 6 0 • • 40 `�L � uil��� i� Tii �r�} C�] 40 40 4199reso.uWatesW RESOLUTION NO. 99- 58 A RESOLUTION OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, ADOPTING RATES, FEES, AND CHARGES FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF UTILITY SERVICES, PURSUANT TO THE. AUTHORITY OF ORDINANCE NO. 91-9. WHEREAS, Indian River County operates a Department of Utility Services, which is funded without contribution from the ad valorem tax fund of the County and is required to support itself from rates, fees, and charges paid by the customers of the utility system; and WHEREAS, Ordinance No. 91-9 authorizes the imposition by the Department of Utility Services of certain rates, fees, and charges to support the operation of the Department in a fair and equitable manner; and WHEREAS, Ordinance No. 92-35 requires an annual review of user charges and notice of rates; and WHEREAS, it is necessary to amend the existing rate resolution to keep the Department of Utility Services on a sound financial footing; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, 'FLORIDA, that: 1. The Schedule of mates, Fees, and Charges described on Exhibit "A" is hereby adopted for use by the Department of Utility Services effective October 1, 1999. 2. Rates, fees, and charges will be reviewed on an annual basis beginning one year from the effective date of this resolution. The resolution was moved for adoption by Commissioner Ginn , and the motion was seconded by Commissioner T i p p i n , and, upon being put to a vote, the vote was as follows: Chairman Kenneth R. Macht Aye Vice Chairman Fran B. Adams Aye Commissioner John W. Tippin Aye Commissioner Ruth M. Stanbridge Aye Commissioner Caroline D. Ginn Aye The Chairman thereupon declared the resolution duly passed and adopted this 22ndday of June .1 1999. HOARD OF UNTY C MISSIONERS INDI IVER COUN FLORIDA Attar J. !C. Barton, Cllr if 'e ri'ccc� ' Kenneth R. Mncht p �y Gt»Ll[ Chairman �r0sn a,rw Z 1, Agy(0104 X9'6 Attachment: Exhibit "A" M a 40 s Indian River Count Department of Utility Serviees Schedule of water and Sewer Rates, Fees and Other Charges Effective October 1, 1999 W i SCHEDULE OF WATER AND SEWER RATES, FEES AND CHARGES INDIAN RWER CCIUNTV, FLORIDA Water Billing Charge - Per Account 51.29 Base Facility Charge: Where Lines Are Available - Single -Family (per ERU) S7.76 Manufactured Home 0.85 (per ERU) 56.60 Multi -Family 0.85 (per ERU) 56.60 Commercial (per ERU) S7.76 Base Facility Charge: Capacity Is Resened But Where Lines Are Not Available - Single -Family (per ERU) S3.88 Manufactured Home 0.85 (per ERU) 53.30 Multi -Family 0.85 (per ERU) $3.30 Commercial (per ERU) 53.88 0 to 3,000 Gallons Per Month Per Connection - Per 1,000 Gallons 52.20 3,001 to 7,000 Gallons per Month Per Connection - Per 1,000 Gallons $2.42 Over 7,000 Gallons Per Month Per Connection - Per 1,000 Gallons 53.85 Greater than 13,000 Gallons Per Month Per ERU - Per 1,00 Gallons 57.74 Sewer Billing. Charge - Per Account $1.29 Base Facility Charge Where Lines Are Available - Single -Family (per ERU) S14.58 Manufactured Home 0.85 (per ERU) 512.44 Multi -Family 0.85 (per ERU) $12.40 Commercial (per ERU) S14.58 Base Facilities Charge Where Capacity is Reserved But Lines Are Not. Available - Single -Family (per ERU) 57.29 Manufactured Home 0.85 (per ERU) 56.20 Multi -Family 0.85 (per ERU) S6.20 Commercial (per ERU) 57.29 Volume Charge Per i,000 Gallons -12,040 Gallons Per Month Maximum for Single-Fansily & Manufactured Homes, Individual meters S2.86 Multi -Family Itlaster-metered & Commercial 0 to 13,040 Gallons - billed water flow 52.86 Abaye 13,004 Gallons - billed water flow 5.1.29 40 410 40 SCHEDULE OF WATER AND SEWER RATES, FEES AND CHARGES put ►Vater Billing Charge - Per Account Per Month 51.29 Base Facility Charge Where Lines are Available - Per ERU 56.19 'Base Facility Charge Where Capacity is Reserved, But Lines are not Available • Per ERU 53.10 Volume Charge -per 1,0010 gallons Water Meter Basis 52.63 Excess Volume Surcharge - Greater than 7600 gallons per month - Per ERU" "Surcharge for bulk users wit] apply to flow exceeding total capacity reserved by bulk user in all meters. $3.45 Bulk Sewer Billing Charge - Per Account Per Month S1.29 Base Facility Charge Where Lines are Available - Per ERU 513.41 Base Facility Charge Where Capacity Is Reserved, But Lines are not Available - Per ERU 56.71 Volume Charge - per 1,000 gallons Water Meter Basis $2.63 Volume Charge - per 1,600 gallons Seiver Meter Basis 52.98 Excess Volume Surcharge - Greater than 7600 gallons per month - Per ERU• "Surcharge for bulk users will apply to flow exceeding total capacity reserved by bulk user in all meters. 54.45 Excess Sewage Strength Charge Sewage Charge X Ratio of Total Dissolved Solids or Biochemical Oxygen Demand In Milligrams per liter/250. Excess Sewage Strength Charge Applicable to Customers Required to Use Creasetraps but who have obtained a Variance due io hardship or financial unfeasibitity Sewage Charge Reclaimed }rater- ner 1,000 gallons $0.15 Sludge and Septage Rates( Charge per 1,000 gallons(a) 530.82 Charge p c r wet to S 7.51 Notes: � (a) Recommended rates assume domestic sludge with solids concentrations of between .5 and 2.0 percent. (b) Costs incurred by County to sample, monitor andfor test wastes to verify solids concentrations, metals, content, etc. or additional costs incurred to handle or dispose of wastes with high metal concentrations or other nondomestic waste characteristics should he recovered from the users discharging the wastes in addition to the above charges based on formula's available in the Department or Utility Services. 40 i SCHEDULE OF WATER AND SEWER RATES, FEES AND CHARGES CAPACIT'+1'` g AR E ►Nater- Per ERLI Water Trcalment S 320.00 Water Transmission 980. Total $1,300.00 Sewer - Per ERU Wastewater Treatment $2,087.00 Wastewater Transmission S 709.00 Total $2,796.00 Line Extension Charges Main Extension -Water Per foot measured along front of property served. 511.25 Main Extension Sewer and Seger Laterals Per foot measured along front of property served. 515.77 (Note: Charge doubles if service available on one side only, minimum of 50 feet per EAU, maximum of 100 reel per ERII) OTHER CHARGES Deposits -Required Unon Opening. Transferrinu or Reconnecting Sen -ice Residential and Commercial - Per ERU S 50.00 Hydrant Meter S345.00 Interest Rate paid on Deposits .00208°Jo- per month 2.5% per year Charge for Returned Check S20.00 Issuance of Duplicate Bill S 1.50 Sewer Tap Cost plus overhead Meter Replacement 5/8 Inch 5100.00 1Inch S12540 1-112 Inch S300.00 2 Inch or larger Cost plus overhead Meter Removal 5f8 Inch S30.00 r 1 Inch $ 30.00 1 12 Inch and larger S40.00 Water Service Connection_ Sig Inch Meter 54011.00 I Inch Meter 5460;00 1-112 Inch Meter 5010.00 Larger than 1-V2 Inch Meter Cost plus overhead 3 r SCHEDULE OF WATER AND SEWER RATES, FEES AND CHARGES Sewer Service Connection Residential 5500.00 Commercial and Other Cost plus overhead Paved Road Cuts Cost plus overhead (5200 minimum) Ruad Jacking and goring Cost plus overhead (S200.00 niinirnum) Grass Restoration Cost plus overhead Unauthorized use of Fire Hydrants 5115.00 Othcr and Extraordinary Services Cost plus overhead Meter Installation 518 Inch Meter 5130.00 1 Inch Meter 5250.00 1.1/2 Inch Meter S500.00 2 Inch Meter Cost plus overhead 31nch Meter and larger Cost plus overhead Fire Hydrant Meter S25.00 Water Service Reconnection During Working Hours $25.00 After Working Hours $35.00 Meter Rereads and Leak Inspection S20.00 Delinquency Charge 52.00 plus 1.5% per month General Service Calls Cost plus overhead Meter Test 518 inch Meter $25.00 1 Inch Meter 525.00 1-1l2Inch Meter or larger Cost plus overhead Damage Repair Cost plus overhead Line Location r Cost plus overhead EngIncerine Services Site Plan Review- Under 40 Units and Without Lift Station Cost plus overhead (550.00 minimum) Site Pian Review - Over 40 Units and With Lift Station Cost per overhead ($1511.00 minimum) Inspection Fee: Water Per Connection S 25.00 (S5o.00 after hours) Sewer Per Connection S 25.00 (S%00 after hours) Hydrant Flow Test $60-00 4 40 r SCHEDULE OF WATER AND SEWER RATES, FEES AND CHARGES Fire prntectlon Charge - per hydrantlyear $170.00 Utility MasterPlan Revisions required by requested changes to the Indian River County Comprehensive Plan shall be paid by the Applicant requesting the change. Cost plus aye rhead FRAI gMLE _CHARGES Application Fees Establish Franchise Franchise Mame Charge Franchise Territory Charge Change of ownership. 49 ERU's or Fewer 5o ERU's or More Rate Hearing: 49 ERU's or Fewer 5o ERU's or More Public Bearing JSlsmn schedutelmsw 5 r Cost plus overhead S 50.00 minimum Cost plus overhead 51,100.00 minimum Cost plus overhead S115.00 minimum Cost plus overhead S115.00 minimum Cost plus overhead 5115.00 minimum Cast plus overhead S300.00 minimum Cost plus overhead S300.00 minimum Cost plus overhead S575-00 minimum Cost plus overhead S115.00 minimum 40 4b Telephone: (5611567.8000 October 30, 2000 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS 1840 251h Street, Vero Beach, ,Florida 32960 Stan Browning Water Use Specialist 1.1 St. Johns River Water Mangement District P.O. Box 1429 Palatka, FL 32178-1429 Dear Mr. Browning: The purpose of this letter is to express Community Development's support for the above -referenced project. The referenced project conforms with Objective 4 of the County's Comprehensive Plan - Sanitary Sewer Sub -Element by providing more reclaimed water to existing and future developments requiring irrigation. Should you have any questions, please contact this office at (561) 567-8000, ext. 247. Sincerely, l John Wachtel Senior Planner cc: Robert. M. Keating, A1CP, Community Development Director Stan Boling, AICP, Planning Director Sasan Rohani, A1CP, Chief, Long -Range Planning ulvljlmccain l .ltr SANITARY SEWER AND POTABLE WATER REGULATIONS § 918.04 CHAPTER tlM SANITARY SEWER. ANID POTADEX WATER REGULATIONS Sec. 918.01. Short title. Sec. 918.02. Purpose and intent. Sec. 918.09. Definitions. Sec. 918.04. Sanitary ewer and potahlo water regu}atimce. Sec- 918.05. Water and wastewater connection requirements for new development_ Section 918.0I, Short title,. This chapter shall be known as the "Sanitary Sewer and Potable Water Regulations Ordinance." (Ord. No. 90.16, § 1,. 9.11.90) Section 918.02. Purpose and intent, The purpose of this chapter is to provide for the implementation of the land development related policies of the sanitary sewer and potable water sub-elementa of the comprehensive plan. Other policies of the sanitary sewer and potable water sub -elements requiring ordinances for implemen- tation will be included in the utilities ordinance in Title Il of the Code of Laws and Ordinances. In the case of duplication between the provisions of this chapter and the utilities ordinance in the'litle II, the provisions of the utilities ordinance will govern. (Ord. No. 90-16, § 1, 9.11.90) Section 918.03. Definitions, All terms defined in Chapter 901, definitions, are applicable in this chapter. (Ord. No. 90.16, § 1, 9-11-90) Section 918.04. Sanitary newer and potable water regulations. ill Single-family dwelling; units and nonresi- dential projects utilizing less than two thousand (2,000) gallons of potable water ger day may use private wells where such wells are approved by regulatory agencies including the county environ• mental health department and utilities depart- ment, in accordance with the connection regula- tions set out in section 918.05 balow. (2) Single-family dwelling units and nonresi- dential projects generating less than two thou- annd (2,000) gallons of wastewater per day may utilize septic tanks for disposal of domestic waste Supp. No. 8 918/1 only, where those septic tanks are approved by the county environmental health and utilities de• partments, and where consistent with the connec• tion regulations set out in section 918,05 below. (3) When effluent reuse is required aid per. witted by the department of environmental reg- ulation and the county utilities department, de- velopers of projects having; open space areas utilizing or projected to utilize ten thousand (10,000) gallons or more water per day on a peak day for irrigation, including golf courses, parks, medians, and other such areas, which are located within a county utility department service area and are within one mile of the nearest effluent line containing irrigation quality effluent, shall construct effluent re -use lines on-site and effluent reuse lines off-site to connect to treated waste- water to be used for spray irrigation of the open space areas within the development project. Such large volume irrigation users shall be re- quired W take re -use water for spray irrigation. The effluent re -use Tines constructed for treated wastewater shall be dedicated to Indian River County. Developments located more than one mile from the neatest irrigation quality effluent Iine and having open space areas requiring irrigation shall inatall dry lines if they are within the county util• ities department service area and irrigation quality effluent water is or will be available for re -use. (4) Regional potable water service will be hm• ited to the service areas shown on Figures 3.8,7, 3.8.8, and 3.8.9 of the potable water sub -element of the Indian River County Comprehensive flan, and to areas where the county has legal commit- ments W provide facilities and services as of Feb- ruary 13, 1990. Regional sanitary sewer service will he limited to the service areas shown on Figures 3.A.8, 3.A.9, and 3.A.10 of the sanitary sewer sub•element of the Indian River Co unty Compr ehe n s ive Plan, and to ureas where the county has legal commitments to provide facilitica and services as of February 13, 1990. (6) No existing on-site wastewater treatment systems or water treatment systems may be re -