Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout10/15/1996MININESOWTACHED BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA A G E N D A TUESDAY, OCTOBER 15,1996 9:00 A.M. - COUNTY COMMISSION CHAMBER County Administration Building 1840 25th Street Vero Beach, Florida COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Fran B. Adams, Chairman (District 1) James E. Chandler, County Administrator Carolyn K. Eggert, Vice Chairman (District 2) Richard N. Bird (District 5) Charles P. Vitunac, County Attorney Kenneth R. Macht (District 3) John W. Tippin (District 4) Jeffrey K. Barton, Clerk to the Board 9:00 a.m. 1. CALL TO ORDER BACRIIP PAGES 2. INVOCATION None 3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE - James E. Chandler 4. ADDITIONS to the AGENDA/EMERGENCY ITEMS' Annual Meeting - Treasure Coast Council of Local Governments 5. - PROCLAMATION and PRESENTATIONS None 6. APPROVAL OF MINUTES A. Special Meeting of September 10, 1996 B. Regular Meeting of September 24, 1996 7. CONSENT AGENDA A. Received & Placed on File in Office of Clerk to the Board: 1) Vero Lakes Water Control District Notice of Registered Agent: Chester Clem, Suite 501, Univest Building, 2770 I. R. Blvd., V.B., FL. 329604278 2) St. Johns River Water Mgmt. Dist. FY 1997 Budget 3) Report of Convictions, Sept., 1996 B. Approval of Warrants (memorandum dated October 3, 1996) 1-9 9:05 A.M. BOOK 99 FIVE:394 7. CONSENT AGENDA (cont'd ): BACKUP PAGES C. Emergency Purchase of Xerox Copier (memorandum dated October 4, 1996) 10-23 D. Removal of Horned Scullies (Tank Traps) from So. Beach - Approval of Right -of -Entry for Construction - Dept. of the Army - Round Island Park (memorandum dated October 9, 1996) 24-30 8. CONSTITUTIONAL OFFICERS and GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES None 9. PUBLIC ITEMS A. PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. AN ORDINANCE OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FL, AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE AND THE ACCOMPANYING ZONING MAP FROM CL TO CG, FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT THE SE CORNER OF CR 510 AND CR 512, AND DESCRIBED HEREIN, AND PROVIDING FOR EFFECTIVE DATE (memorandum dated October 1, 1996) 31-43 2. Pelican Pointe Corp.'s Request for Special Ex- ception Use Approval and Conceptual PD Plan Approval for a 19 Unit Single Family Develop- ment (memorandum dated October 8, 1996) 44-59 3. Bell South Mobility Inc.'s Request for Special Exception Use Approval to Erect a 300' Tower (Vero -4) (memorandum dated October 9, 1996) 60-71 B. PUBLIC DISCUSSION ITEMS Request from David N. Palmer, Event Coordinator, to Discuss "Treasure Coast Open" Use of Wal -mart Park- ing Lot (letter dated October 8, 1996) 72 10. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S MATTERS None 11. DEPARTMENTAL MATTERS A. Community Development None 11. DEPARTMENTAL MATTERS (cont'd.): BACRIIP PAGES B. Emergency Services None C. General Services Award Bid #6089 / Sebastian Phase 1 Water Project (memorandum dated October 2, 1996) 73-82 D. Leisure Services None E. Office of Management and Budget Gifford Park Youth Activities Center (memorandum dated October 4, 1996) 83-87 F. Personnel None G. Public Works 1. Resolutions to Provide for the Paving and Drainage Improvements to and Set Public Hearing Date for 6th Lane, 40th Ave. SW (South of 5th St. SW) and Deuce Court - located in West Side S/D (memorandum dated October 7, 1996) 88-100 2. As -Built Resolutions & Assessment Rolls for Paving & Drainage Improvements to 79th St. Between 101 st Ave. & 91 st Ave. in Vero Lake Estates S/D (memorandum dated October 4, 1996) 101-105 3. Additional Engineering Services for Gifford Park (memorandum dated October 4, 1996) 106-109 4. Request to Use I.R.C. Fairgrounds for Vero Beach Pow Wow (memorandum dated October 7, 1996) 110-115 H. Utilities 1. Laurelwood Force Main & Lift Station Upgrade Change Order No. 3 & Retainage Reduction (memorandum dated October 3, 1996) 116-122 2. 26th St. Reuse Water i.ine Relocation Labor Contract (memorandum dated October 3,1996) 123-125 3. Continuing Services Survey Work in Excess of $10,000.00 (memorandum dated October 2, 1996) 126 gom 99 PncE 395 I BOOK 99 PACE -3,96 11. DEPARTMENTAL MATTERS (cont'd.): BACRpp PAGES H. Utilities (cont'd.): 4. No. County Wellfield Project Finalization (memorandum dated October 3, 1996) 127-139 5. Waste Stream Collection System Construction for So. County Odor Control (memorandum dated October 8, 1996) 140 12. COUNTY ATTORNEY None 13. COMMISSIONERS ITEMS A. Chairman Fran B. Adams B. Vice Chairman Carolyn K. Eggert C. Commissioner Richard N. Bird D. Commissioner Kenneth R. Macht E. Commissioner John W. Tippin 14. SPECIAL DISTRICTS/BOARDS A. Emergency Services District None B. Solid Waste Disposal District 1. Approval of Minutes - Reg. Meeting of 9/24/96 2. I.R. Correctional Institution, 1996 Solid Waste Assessment (memorandum dated October 1, 1996) 141-143 C. Environmental Control Board None 15. ADJOURNMENT Anyone who may wish to appeal any decision which may be made at this meeting will need to ensure. that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made which includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal will be based. Anyone who needs a special accommodation for this meeting may contact the county's Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) coordinator at 567-8000 x408 at least 48 hours in advance )f meeting. Meeting broadcast live on TCI Cable Channel 13 - rebroadcast S: 00 p.m. Thursday through S: 00 p. m. Friday Falcon Cable Channel 35 - rebroadcast Friday evening INDEX TO MINUTES OCTOBER 15, 1996 REGULAR MEETING OF BOARD OF COUNTY COMNIISSIONERS ADDITIONS TO THE AGENDA/EMERGENCY ITEMS . . . . . . . . . . . 1 APPROVAL OF MINUTES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 CONSENT AGENDA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 A. Received & Placed on File in Office of Clerk to the Board. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 B. Approval of Warrants . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 C. Emergency Purchase of Xerox Copier . . . . . . . . . 10 D. Removal of Tank Traps from South Beach by Army Corps ofEngineers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 PUBLIC HEARING - ORDINANCE REZONING 4.2 ACRES FROM CL TO CG - PARADISE CENTRAL CORP. AND 510/512 HOLDINGS, INC. 12 PUBLIC HEARING - PELICAN POINTE CORP.'S REQUEST FOR SPECIAL EXCEPTION USE APPROVAL AND CONCEPTUAL PD PLAN APPROVAL 21 PUBLIC HEARING - BELL SOUTH MOBILITY, INC. REQUEST FOR SPECIAL EXCEPTION USE APPROVAL TO ERECT A 300 FT. TOWER . . . . 22 DAVID PALMER'S REQUEST TO HOLD SKATEBOARDING EVENT IN WAL-MART PARKING LOT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34 AWARD BID #6089 - SEBASTIAN WATER PROJECT - PHASE I . . . . . 35 GIFFORD PARK YOUTH ACTIVITIES CENTER . . . . . . . . . . . . 37 RESOLUTIONS TO PROVIDE FOR PAVING & DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS AND SET PUBLIC HEARING DATE FOR 6TH LANE, 40TH AVENUE SW AND DEUCE COURT IN WEST SIDE SUBDIVISION . . . . . . . . . . 40 AS -BUILT RESOLUTION & ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR PAVING & DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS TO 79TH STREET BETWEEN 101ST AVENUE AND 91ST AVENUE IN VERO LAKE ESTATES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50 ADDITIONAL ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR GIFFORD PARK . . . . . . 55 IRC FAIRGROUNDS - VERO BEACH POW POW . . . . . . . . . . . . 56 LAURELWOOD FORCE MAIN & LIFT STATION UPGRADE - CHANGE ORDER #3 - TREASURE COAST CONTRACTOR . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 58 26TH STREET REUSE WATER LINE RELOCATION - WORK AUTHORIZATION NO. 40 - DRIVEWAYS, INC . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 59 CONTINUING SERVICES SURVEY WORK IN EXCESS OF $10,000 . . . . 60 NORTH COUNTY WELL FIELD PROJECT FINALIZATION - MISSIMER INTERNATIONAL AND AMERICAN DRILLING . . . . . . . . . . 61 1 OCTOBER 15, 1996 BOOK 99 FA E 397 BOOK 99 PAEM WASTE STREAM COLLECTION SYSTEM CONSTRUCTION FOR SOUTH COUNTY ODOR CONTROL . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 63 TREASURE COAST COUNCIL OF LOCAL GOVERNMENTS . . . . . . . . . 65 SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL DISTRICT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 65 2 OCTOBER 15, 1996 � r � Tuesday, October 15, 1996 The Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida, met in Regular Session at the County Commission Chambers, 1840 25th Street, Vero Beach, Florida, on Tuesday, October 15, 1996, at 9:00 a.m. Present were Fran B. Adams, Chairman; Carolyn K. Eggert, Vice Chairman; Richard N. Bird; Kenneth R. Macht; and John W. Tippin. Also present were James E. Chandler, County Administrator; Charles P. Vitunac, County Attorney; and Barbara Bonnah, Deputy Clerk. The Chairman called the meeting to order, and Administrator Chandler led the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag. On behalf of the Board, Chairman Adams congratulated Commissioner Macht on his recent marriage and wished the newlyweds every happiness. ADDITIONS TO THE AGENDA/EMERGENCY ITEMS Commissioner Tippin requested the addition of a comment regarding the Treasure Coast Council of Local Governments. ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by Commissioner Bird, the Board unanimously added the above item to today's Agenda. APPROVAL OF MINU'T'ES Chairman Adams asked if there were any corrections or additions to the Minutes of the Special Meeting of September 10, 1996. There were none. ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by Commissioner Bird, the Board unanimously approved the Minutes of the Special Meeting of 9/10/96, as written. 1 BOOK � 99 ,Pk:GE•.��� OCTOBER 15, 1996 1. BOOK 99 PnE 400 . Chairman asked if there were any corrections or additions to the Regular Meeting of September 24, 1996. There were none. ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by Commissioner Bird, the Board unanimously approved the Minutes of the Regular Meeting of 9/24/96, as written. CONSENT AGENDA A. Received & Placed on File in Office of Clerk to the Board: 1) Vero Lakes Water Control District Notice of Registered Agent: Chester Clem, Suite 501, Univest Building, 2770 I.R. Blvd., Vero Beach, FL. 32960-4278 2) St. Johns River Water Management District FY -1997 Budget 3) Report of Convictions, September, 1996 B. Approval of Warrants The Board reviewed the following memo dated 10/3/96: TO: HONORABLE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS DATE: OCTOBER 3, 1996 SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF WARRANTS FROM: EDWIN M. FRY, JR., FINANCE DIRECTOR In compliance -with Chapter 136.06, Florida Statutes, all warrants issued by the Board of County Commissioners are to be recorded in the Board minutes. Approval is requested for the attached list of warrants, issued by the Clerk to the Board, for the time period of September 30, to October 3, 1996. ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by Commissioner Bird, the Board unanimously approved the list of warrants issued by the Clerk to the Board for the time period of September 30 to October 3, 1996. E OCTOBER 15, 1996 3 BOOK 99 PAGE 401 OCTOBER 15, 1996 CHECK CHECK CHECK NAME DATE AMOUNT NUMBER 0017923 BARTON, JEFFREY K -CLERK 9/30/96 9/30/96 75.70 57.00 0017924 ATLANTIC COASTAL TITLE CORP 9/30/96 1,700.16 0017925 BARTON, JEFFREY K -CLERK 9/30/96 298.50 0017926 BARTON, JEFFREY K -CLERK 9/30/96 615.00 0017927 BARTON, JEFFREY K -CLERK 10/01/96 15.00 0017928 BARTON, JEFFREY K -CLERK 10/01/96 11.20 0017929 0017930 BARTON, JEFFREY K -CLERK CARROLL, CATHERINE A LILLY 10/01/96 300.00 0017931 BARLOW, MYONG HUI ECONOMICS RESEARCH ASSOCIATES 10/01/96 10/01/96 300.00 22,534.00 0017932 0210300 A A FIRE EQUIPMENT, INC 10/03/96 10/03/96 115.50 87.55 0210301 0210302 ALPHA ACE HARDWARE APPLE MACHINERY & SUPPLY 10/03/96 10.80 0210303 ARMFIELD-WAGNER APPRAISAL 10/03/96 10/03/96 1,260.00 418.07 0210304 ATCO TOOL SUPPLY 10/03/96 458.00 0210305 0210306 ALL VERO VACUUM AETNA LIFE INSURANCE AND 10/03/96 863.72 0210307 ALL POWER SERVICES, INC 10/03/96 10/03/96 1,560.00 54.60 0210308 0210309 A T &.T AMERICAN SOCIETY OF CIVIL 10/03/96 10/03/96 280.00 90,498.37 0210310 ANTHEM LIFE HEALTH TRUST LIFE INSURANCE CO 10/03/96 16,294.08 0210311 ANTHEM 10/03/96 19.10 0210312 A T & T 10/03/96 78.38 0210313 0210314 A T & T ALLIED MEDICAL SERVICES 10/03/96 137.54 0210315 AQUATIC SYSTEMS, INC 10/03/96 10/03/96 570.00 40.86 0210316 ALL COUNTY EQUIPMENT COMPANY 10/03/96 72.00 0210317 0210318 BAKER, HELEN M' BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS 10/03/96 3,388.82 0210319 BENSONS LOCK SERVICE 10/03/96 10/03/96 156.63 26.00 0210320 BOLING, STAN 10/03/96 6.00 0210321 0210322 BOWLING, C G BELLSOUTH MOBILITY 10/03/96 15.00 0210323 BARTON, JEFFREY K -CLERK 10/03/96 10/03/96 6,183.75 95.00 0210324 0210325 BARTON, JEFFREY K -CLERK B & B INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY CO. 10/03/96 1,262.21 0210326 BRIDGESTONE SPORTS, INC 10/03/96 10/03/96 65.76 20.00 0210327 BUILDING OFFICIALS ASSOCIATION 10/03/96 114.13 0210328 BOYNTON PUMP & IRRIGATION 10/03/96 217.79 0210329 0210330 BILLING SERVICE, INC BAKER & TAYLOR ENTERTAINMENT 10/03/96 229.00 0210331 BELLSOUTH 10/03/96 10/03/96 1,083.55 9,490.50 0210332 0210333 BERMEX, INC BREVARD ANESTHESIA SERVICES 10/03/96 265.00 0210334 BAILEY, HERBERT L 10/03/96 10/03/96 250.00 38.25 0210335 BASSOFF, JESSICA 10/03/96 450.00 0210336 0210337 BEERS, ANNA CHANDLER EQUIPMENT CO, INC 10/03/96 406.70 0210338 CHUCK'S ELECTRIC MOTORS, INC 10/03/96 10/03/96 679.00 429.00 0210339 0210340 CLEMENT COMMUNICATIONS, INC COMMUNICATIONS INT, INC 10/03/96 10,822.14 0210341 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRIC SUPPLY 10/03/96 10/03/96 1,881.00 160.17 0210342 CONSTRUCTION HYDRAULICS 10/03/96 3,910.00 0210343 0210344 COMPUTER & PERIPHERIAL CUTTING EDGE SIGN CO., THE 10/03/96 200.00 0210345 COASTAL FUELS MARKETING, INC 10/03/96 6,978.90 3 BOOK 99 PAGE 401 OCTOBER 15, 1996 Boo4 99 PALE 402 CHECK NAME COCK CHECK NUMBER DATE AMOUNT 0210346 CLINIC PHARMACY 10/03/96 10/03/96 114.30 30.00 0210347 CHIP HARVESTORS 10/03/96 195.00 0210348 0210349 CLIFF BERRY, INC CINDY'S PET CENTER, INC 10/03/96 153.20 0210350 C & G BUILDERS 10/03/96 500.00 0210351 COLE, J DEAN, MD 10/03/96 10/03/96 21.00 1,229.19 0210352 COMMERCIAL SERVICE COMPANY 10/03/96 121.06 0210353 0210354 CULBERT, DANIEL F COASTAL ORTHOPAEDICS CENTER 10/03/96 57.00 0210355 CLIFFORD, MIKE 10/03/96 10/03/96 100.00 500.00 0210356 COMPUTER DESIGNS 10/03/96 600.00 0210357 0210358 CRINER PETROLEUM CERTIFIED SWEEPING, INC 10/03/96 3.68 0210359 CENTRAL A/C & REFRG SUPPLY 10/03/96 507.15 0210360 DOCTOR'S CLINIC 10/03/96 10/03/96 1,014.35 80.50 0210361 DIXON, PEGGY C 10/03/96 136.32 0210362 0210363 DIETZ, DANIEL DISCOUNT AUTO PARTS 10/03/96 29.94 0210364 DATA FLOW SYSTEMS, INC 10/03/96 10/03/96 4,638.00 7,100.75 0210365 DAVIS METER/`U S FILTER 10/03/96 250.00 0210366 0210367 DAVIS, CHARLES E, JR FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF MGMT 10/03/96 120.00 0210368 DIAMOND MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS,INC 10/03/96 375.00 98.22 0210369 DADE PAPER COMPANY 10/03/96 10/03/96 218.00 0210370 0210371 DOUBLETREE RESORT E -Z BREW COFFEE SERVICE, INC 10/03/96 78.50 0210372 EMPIRE ENGINEERING, INC 10/03/96 10/03/96 87.50 41.00 0210373 EMERGENCY MEDICINE ASSOCIATES 10/03/96 636.17 0210374 0210375 E I T EAST COAST SOD 10/03/96 11,434.50 0210376 EXPEDITER INC, THE 10/03/96 10/03/96 128.40 114.97 0210377 EMPIRE GENERATOR CORP 10/03/96 44.78 0210378 FIRESIDE THEATRE, THE 10/03/96 240.00 0210379 0210380 FLORIDA BAR, THE FLORIDA CITY & COUNTY 10/03/96 235.00 0210381 FLORIDA COCA-COLA BOTTLING CO 10/03/96 10/03/96 129.00 1,779.50 0210382 FLORIDA LEAGUE OF CITIES 10/03/96 7,261.13 0210383 0210384 F P & L FLORIDA RETIREMENT SYSTEM 10/03/96 309,470.07 0210385 FLORIDA RIBBON & CARBON 10/03/96 10/03/96 390.86 1,675.00 0210386 FRASER ENGINEERING & TESTING 10/03/96 51.84 0210387 0210388 FLOWERS BAKING COMPANY OF FLORIDA TIRE RECYCLING, INC 10/03/96 1,607.40 -0210389 FLINN, SHEILA I 10/03/96 10/03/96 241.50 4,440.00 0210390 FMC CORPORATION 10/03/96 453.50 0210391 FERNANDEZ, ELLEN D 10/03/96 73.61 0210392 GATOR LUMBER COMPANY 10/03/96 22.07 0210393 GEORGE W FOWLER_CO 10/03/96 170.77 0210394 GLIDDEN COMPANY, THE 10/03/96 3,420.00 0210395 0210396 GLISSON & SONS GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO, INC 10/03/96 174.19 0210397 GALLS, INC 10/03/96 40.84 0210398 GLASER, BONNIE B, P A 10/03/96 10/03/96 250.00 154.90 0210399 0210400 G NEIL COMPANIES GOLF ASSOCIATES SCORECARD CO 10/03/96 1,940.92 0210401 GARD DISTRIBUTING 10/03/96 630.00 4 OCTOBER 15, 1996 CHECK NAME CHECK CHECK NUMBER DATE AMOUNT 0210402 GOETSCHEL FUNDING COMPANY 10/03/96 500.00 0210403 GINN, CAROLINE D 10/03/96 250.00 0210404 H F SCIENTIFIC, INC 10/03/96 178.15 0210405 HARRIS SANITATION 10/03/96 435.33 0210406 HEATH, CHARLES W 10/03/96 6.00 0210407 HERE'S FRED GOLF CO, INC 10/03/96 -28.16 0210408 HI -TECH SERVICING TECH 10/03/96 4,250.00 0210409 HUMANES, OTIS E JR 10/03/96 6.00 0210410 HACH SUPPLY 10/03/96 1,185.00 0210411 HARRIS SANITATION, INC 10/03/96 0210412 HOLMES REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER 10/03/96 _45,433.74 1,396.50 0210413 HORTICULTURAL MANAGEMENT INC 10/03/96 150.00 0210414 HORIZON NURSERY 10/03/96 23.20 0210415 HAGEN, SARAH 10/03/96 36.13 0210416 INDIAN RIVER ACE PAINT 10/03/96 13.71 0210417 INDIAN RIVER BATTERY 10/03/96 146.10 0210418 INDIAN RIVER BLUE PRINT, INC 10/03/96 160.88 0210419 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY 10/03/96 85.00 0210420 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY UTILITIES 10/03/96 2,004.13 0210421 INDIAN RIVER MEMORIAL HOSPITAL 10/03/96 199.50 0210422 INGRAM - 10/03/96 292.31 0210423 INDIAN RIVER MEMORIAL HOSPITAL 10/03/96 6.00 0210424 INTERSTATE BILLING SERVICE 10/03/96 173.38 0210425 INDIAN RIVER MEMORIAL HOSPITAL 10/03/96 2,204.07 0210426 INSURANCE SERVICING & 10/03/96 1,940.00 0210427 INDIAN RIVER MRI JOINT VENTURE 10/03/96 450.00 0210428 INNOVATIVE NETWORK SYSTEMS 10/03/96 2,722.25 0210429 INDIAN RIVER ALLFAB 10/03/96 849.00 0210430 INTERNATIONAL ELECTRIC 10/03/96 2,780.00 0210431 INTERIM PERSONNEL:VERO BEACH 10/03/96 756.00 0210432 HOMELAND IRRIGATION CENTER 10/03/96 52.35 0210433 JANIE DEAN CHEVROLET, INC 10/03/96 2.08 0210434 JOHN SELLERS PHOTOGRAPHY 10/03/96 5.85 0210435 JORDAN, ELIZABETH M 10/03/96 16.82 0210436 JONES CHEMICALS, INC 10/03/96 2,340.00 0210437 KEATING, ROBERT M 10/03/96 189.90 0210438 KELLY TRACTOR CO 10/03/96 736.43 0210439 KNIGHT & MATHIS, INC 10/03/96 34.40 0210440 K & S RIP RAP SERVICES 10/03/96 9,660.00 0210441 KESSLER, MICHAEL 10/03/96 250.00 0210442 KIRBY AUTO SUPPLY 10/03/96 171.38 0210443 KT MOWER & EQUIPMENT 10/03/96 120.51 0210444 LIGHT SOURCE -TONER SUPPLY 10/03/96 378.00 0210445 LOCKS CO 10/03/96 49.99 0210446 LAJOIE, ROGER W 10/03/96 250.00 0210447 LESCO, INC 10/03/96 175.45 0210448 LIBERTY BUSINESS MACHINES 10/03/96 325.00 0210449 MACMILLAN OIL COMPANY 10/03/96 245.10 0210450 MARPAN SUPPLY CO, INC 10/03/96 684.00 0210451 MASSUNG, KIMBERLY E 10/03/96 35.00 0210452 MAX DAVIS ASSOCIATES 10/03/96 268.74 0210453 MAXWELL PLUMBING, INC 10/03/96 299.75 0210454 MEEKS PLUMBING 10/03/96 60.75 0210455 MORGAN, DAVID C 10/03/96 250.00 0210456 MOSES AUTO PARTS 10/03/96 80.22 0210457 MATRX MEDICAL, INC 10/03/96 115.00 OCTOBER 15, 1996 5 BOOK 99 PACE 403 BOOK 99 PAGE 6 OCTOBER 15, 1996 CHECK CHECK CHECK NAME DATE AMOUNT NUMBER 0210458 MORNING STAR PERSONALIZED 10/03/96 10/03/96 973.25 33.03 0210459 MCMASTER-CARR SUPPLY COMPANY 10/03/96 250.00 0210460 MAYFIELD, STANLEY E 10/03/96 42.49 0210461 0210462 MICHIE MORA, CHRISTOPHER R 10/03/96 115.50 134.63 0210463 M C B COLLECTION SERVICES 10/03/96 10/03/96 138.40 0210464 MR BOB PORTABLE TOILET 10/03/96 250.00 0210465 MANCINI, JOSEPH J. 10/03/96 500.00 0210466 MCLAUGHLIN, J. 10/03/96 157,031.00 0210467 0210468 NOLTE, DAVID C NATIONAL AMBULANCE BUILDERS, 10/03/96 300.00 25 0210469 NAPIER, WILLIAM M 10/03/96 10/03/96 .00 566.32 0210470 0210471 NOLEN, VICKIE L OMNI BUSINESS SYSTEMS, INC 10/03/96 20.00 180.00 0210472 OSBORN, MERLE RN 10/03/96 10/03/96 266.67 0210473 OFFICE DEPOT, INC 10/03/96 47.72 0210474 0210475 OSCEOLA PHARMACY PEPSI -COLA BOTTLING GROUP 10/03/96 18.75 64.00 0210476 PERKINS DRUG, INC 10/03/96 10/03/96 134.20 0210477 PETTY CASH 10/03/96 192.22 0210478 0210479 PETTY CASH PINTO, TERRANCE G 10/03/96 50.00 576.00 0210480 POSTMASTER 10/03/96 10/03/96 856.00 0210481 0210482 POWERRAM, INC PORT PETROLEUM, INC 10/03/96 1,109.77 9,465.18 0210483 PELICAN POINTE 10/03/96 10/03/96 24,941.00 0210484 PRECISION CONTRACTING 10/03/96 22.45 0210485 0210486 PUBLICATIONS --NACO RADIO SHACK ACCT RECEIVABLE 10/03/96 356.91 0210487 RIFKIN, SHELDON H PHD 10/03/96 10/03/96 2,500.00 137.00 0210488 RUSSELL CONCRETE, INC 10/03/96 6.00 0210489 0210490 ROHANI, SASAN ROBERTS & REYNOLDS PA 10/03/96 1,421.98 37.32 0210491 RETHMAN, MARY LOU 10/03/96 10/03/96 69.82 0210492 RUBBER STAMP EXPRESS 10/03/96 652.42 0210493 0210494 RISSMAN, WEISBERG, BARRETT, RAFTELIS ENVIRONMENTAL 10/03/96 28,667.16 429.00 0210495 RICE, FRED & ASSOCIATES 10/03/96 10/03/96 119.85 0210496 SAFETY KLEEN CORP 10/03/96 1,437.64 0210497 SCOTTY'S, INC 10/03/96 22.28 0210498 0210499 SHELL OIL COMPANY SHEPARD'S MCGRAW-HILL, INC 10/03/96 2,809.70 115.25 0210500 SHERWIN-WILLIAMS 10/03/96 10/03/96 205.00 0210501 0210502 SHAW, DAVID D C SOUTHERN CULVERT, DIV O F 10/03/96 1,816.00 98.40 0210503 SOUTHERN EAGLE DISTRIBUTING, 10/03/96 10/03/96 458.99 0210504 STATE CHEMICAL MFG CO 10/03/96 17.76 0210505 SOUTHERN TRUCK EQUIPMENT ST LUCIE B ATTERY & TIRE, INC 10/03/96 12.95 0210506 0210507 STURGIS LUMBER & PLYWOOD CO 10/03/96 10/03/96 4.58 4 557.47 0210508 SUNRISE FORD TRAC'T'OR CO 10/03/96 7.00 0210509 SIGNS IN A DAY 10/03/96 273.00 0210510 0210511 J A SEXAUER, INC SOUTHERN JANITOR SUPPLY 10/03/96 1,615.23 142.50 0210512 SOUTHERN SEWER EQUIPMENT SALES 10/03/96 10/03/96 434.00 0210513 SPALDING SPORTS WORLD WIDE 6 OCTOBER 15, 1996 CHECK NAME CHECK CHECK NUMBER DATE AMOUNT 0210514 SAWMILL RIDGE TRUCKING CO 10/03/96 16,974.05 0210515 SUPERIOR PRINTING 10/03/96 436.00 0210516 SYSCO FOOD SERVICE 10/03/96 1,124.62 0210517 STEWART INDUSTRIES 10/03/96 4,474.33 0210518 SCHILL, LARRY 10/03/96 230.00 0210519 SPARLING INSTRUMENT CO., INC 10/03/96 524.84 0210520 SMITH, DONALD 10/03/96 444.00 0210521 STALHEBER, JOHN J 10/03/96 1,677.00 0210522 STATE OF FLORIDA CRIMES 10/03/96 507.77 0210523 SUMMER INC 10/03/96 190.00 0210524 SOUTHERN LOCK AND SUPPLY CO 10/03/96 304.34 0210525 SUNNYLAND CLEARING 10/03/96 13,500.00 0210526 SERUG 96 10/03/96 120.00 0210527 STEWART TITLE OF I.R.C. 10/03/96 15,000.00 0210528 SHINN, CHARLES III 10/03/96 250.00 0210529 STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY 10/03/96 43.00 0210530 SHERIFF OF OSCEOLA COUNTY 10/03/96 20.00 0210531 SHAVER R W (FPL) 10/03/96 56.00 0210532 SCHARF, ALAN F 10/03/96 95.72 0210533 SCOTT'S TREE SERVICE 10/03/96 450.00 0210534 TAMPA ARMATURE WORKS, INC 10/03/96 350.00 0210535 TEN -8 FIRE EQUIPMENT, INC 10/03/96 311.79 0210536 TITLEIST DRAWER CS 10/03/96 146.03 0210537 TREASURE COAST REGIONAL 10/03/96 33,086.00 0210538 TRODGLEN PAVING, INC 10/03/96 1,959.71 0210539 TURNER INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY CO 10/03/96 77.79 0210540 TAMPA WESTSHORE MARRIOTT HOTEL 10/03/96 95.00 0210541 TRIPSON, MARK 10/03/96 27.00 0210542 TAYLOR, CHRIS 10/03/96 45.44 0210543 THOMAS, DEBBY 10/03/96 220.50 0210544 THOMAS, DEBBY 10/03/96 469.00 0210545 TREADWELL INC 10/03/96 499.25 0210546 TORRES, JILL 10/03/96 105.00 0210547 TRAINING NETWORK INC 10/03/96 312.00 0210548 UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA 10/03/96 24.00 0210549 UNIVERSAL ENGINEERING SCIENCES 10/03/96 495.00 0210550 USA FLEX INC 10/03/96 818.95 0210551 VELDE FORD, INC 10/03/96 137.34 0210552 VERO BEACH PRESS JOURNAL 10/03/96 37.20 0210553 VERO BEACH, CITY OF 10/03/96 6,361.47 0210554 VERO LAWNMOWER CENTER, INC 10/03/96 391.65 0210555 VERO BEACH, CITY OF 10/03/96 221.80 0210556 VEY, CARRIE 10/03/96 21.25 0210557 VERO BEARING & BOLT 10/03/96 90.08 0210558 VANSTAR 10/03/96 43,756.00 0210559 WAKEFIELD, JUDITH A 10/03/96 100.10 0210560 WAL-MART STORES, INC 10/03/96 772.51 0210561 WEST PUBLISHING CORP 10/03/96 716.75 0210562 W W GRAINGER, INC 10/03/96 86.30 0210563 WAL-MART STORES, INC 10/03/96 206.74 0210564 WIGINTON FIRE SPRINKLERS,INC 10/03/96 450.00 0210565 WILLHOFF, PATSY 10/03/96 130.00 0210566 WORDPERFECT MAGAZINE 10/03/96 27.97 0210567 WOLFE, MEGAN 10/03/96 48.88 0210568 WBBE RADIO 10/03/96 900.00 ,0210569 WHITTINGTON, MEGAN 10/03/96 21.25 � OCTOBER 15, 1996 Boor 99 40 I BOOK 99 PAGE 406 CHECK NAME CHECK CHECK NUMBER DATE AMOUNT 0210570 XEROX CORPORATION 10/03/96 7,555.00 0210571 ZEPHYRHILLS SPRING WATER CO 10/03/96 9.50 0210572 ZOOK ENTERPRISES 10/03/96 120.49 0210573 SCHUCKERS, GERALD 10/03/96 182.44 0210574 DAWSEYS AUTO CENTER 10/03/96 107.16 0210575 WILKLOW, LEIGHTON B 10/03/96 _.105.18 0210576 WADE, STEVEN 10/03/96 52.61 0210577 WALLS, ROLAND R 10/03/96 100.00 0210578 SHEPHERD, JESSIE M 10/03/96 106.22 0210579 DE STASIO, VINCENT 10/03/96 120.60 0210580 SIMOS, NICHOLAS M 10/03/96 80.00 0210581 STERRETT, ROBERT R 10/03/96 105.12 0210582 MASCIARELLI, WILLIAM R 10/03/96 52.54 0210583 STINSON, ELEANOR 10/03/96 56.31 0210584 ZICKLER, BOBBIE H 10/03/96 109.40 0210585 OSLAND, DR KNUT 10/03/96 100.00 0210586 HIGGINS JR, JOSEPH C 10/03/96 106.02 0210587 DUNKELMAN, ELAINE 10/03/96 105.28 0210588 PIEROZAK, EMIL 10/03/96 53.93 0210589 CRUZE, LOIS H 10/03/96 99.06 0210590 MOISE, ELSIE & KESNER 10/03/96 90.98 0210591 HARRIS, WILLIAM 10/03/96 105.10 0210592 SHENBAUM, SUSAN 10/03/96 75.37 0210593 PARFIMOWICZ, M/M BOLESLAUS 10/03/96 100.00 0210594 JAMES, WILLIAM & JOY 10/03/96 105.64 0210595 HIGH JR, FRANKLIN F 10/03/96 54.66 0210596 SMITH, DONALD R 10/03/96 54.12 0210597 MCCARTNEY, KATHLEEN 10/03/96 52.96 0210598 SIMONS, JEFFREY L 10/03/96 52.60 0210599 SHOWALTER JR, FORREST 10/03/96 52.52 0210600 HICKMAN, JOAN T 10/03/96 54.65 0210601 WILDMAN, TIFFANY 10/03/96 105.10 0210602 SIMMONS, NORMAN F 10/03/96 52.61 0210603 LANGLEY, MRS GRACE C 10/03/96 53.01 0210604 POLK, JAMES J 10/03/96 52.61 0210605 PRANGE, RICHARD 10/03/96 52.53 0210606 BRANDON CAPITAL CORP 10/03/96 63.68 0210607 GREGG, JAMES B 10/03/96 73.18 0210608 KLINE, LARRY 10/03/96 69.34 0210609 GRAND HARBOR 10/03/96 100.66 0210610 ZIMMERMAN, WILLIAM F 10/03/96 55.72 0210611 HOGAN, JAMES 10/03/96 36.32 0210612 SEC OF VET OFFICE 10/03/96 37.48 0210613 HOLIDAY BUILDERS 10/03/96 19.53 0210614 BROOKS, RUTH 10/03/96 37.87 0210615 MAJESTIC PARTNER OF VB LTD 10/03/96 34.81 0210616 SANDERS, CAROLYN 10/03/96 2.24 0210617 JONES, MERRION 10/03/96 63.22 0210618 MURRAY, MARY & RUTHVEN 10/03/96 23.12 0210619 TAYLOR, DANIEL 10/03/96 45.09 0210620 MILLER, ALVIN L 10/03/96 35.33 0210621 NELSON, SAM 10/03/96 21.86 _ 0210622 JONES, IDA R 10/03/96 21.63 0210623 MANUFACTURED HOME COMM/REPOS 10/03/96 14.97 0210624 ALEXANDER, WAYNE L 10/03/96 48.21 0210625 GIFFORD GARDENS 10/03/96 41.67 8 OCTOBER 15, 1996 CHECK NAME CHECK CHECK NUMBER DATE AMOUNT 0210626 COOLEY, BRIAN C 10/03/96 48.98 0210627 EVANS, EDNA 10/03/96 14.29 0210628 WATERS, MARK 10/03/96 3.70 0210629 FITZPATRICK SR, DONALD 10/03/96 28.34 0210630 BROUDER, LISA 10/03/96 82.33 0210631 DETKO, CATHY 10/03/96 49.83 0210632 IAVARONE, ANTONIO 10/03/96 40.58 0210633 SIMPSON, THOMAS E OR SHARON 10/03/96 36.12 0210634 DRIVER, DELORES 10/03/96 30.14 0210635 PACKARD, WILLARD C 10/03/96 61.77 0210636 SNIFFIN, CYNTHIA S 10/03/96 66.35 0210637 PHELPS, LAURA 10/03/96 7.01 0210638 FITZPATRICK SR, DONALD R 10/03/96 23.51 0210639 PAVOLINI, SANDRA R 10/03/96 51.09 0210640 LOTT, ALAN 10/03/96 98.96 0210641 COOK, ADELLA 10/03/96 114.72 0210642 JOHNSON, THOMAS A 10/03/96 105.14 0210643 ALDRIDGE, CHARLES R 10/03/96 53.00 0210644 STRANDELL, JOHN R 10/03/96 52.57 0210645 BURTON, FLORENCE 10/03/96 105.04 0210646 WASHER, CHARLES E 10/03/96 98.96 0210647 MACOGNONE, JACK 10/03/96 80.00 0210648 GLENN, EDMMANUEL 10/03/96 59.96 0210649 WBH CONSTRUCTION 10/03/96 34.11 0210650 HAWLEY, DENNIS 10/03/96 212.35 0210651 BOWEN, JEFFREY & PAMELA 10/03/96 31.37 0210652 PARIS, WESLEY 10/03/96 51.79 0210653 WINDSOR PROPERTIES, INC 10/03/96 61.32 0210654 KRAWEC,OLGA 10/03/96 45.05 0210655 TALL PINES ASSOC INC 10/03/96 41.48 0210656 HOLIDAY BUILDERS 10/03/96 55.30 0210657 GUSTAVES, SELMER 10/03/96 26.37 0210658 ROBERTS, DAIREN & KIM 10/03/96 27.96 0210659 WHITE, PINKIE R 10/03/96 24.83 0210660 ROBINSON JR, ROY L 10/03/96 68.64 0210661 JEFFERSON, SHEILA 10/03/96 37.04 0210662 SHAFFER, MONA 10/03/96 93.15 0210663 KITCHEN, JOHN F 10/03/96 73.87 0210664 WRIGHT, RAYMOND M & DIANA 10/03/96 25.44 0210665 STEPANEK, GARY 10/03/96 29.92 0210666 WILLIAMS, ROBERT T 10/03/96 36.56 0210667 SELPH, KATHLEEN 10/03/96 19.27 0210668 SABONJOHN, JAMES 10/03/96 17.62 0210669 HARRIS, REGINALD 10/03/96 13.17 0210670 INDIAN RIVER CLUB 10/03/96 551.39 0210671 MARTIN, T ERIC 10/03/96 28.90 0210672 CORNERSTONE SELECT HOMES INC 10/03/96 127.25 0210673 BRISTOW, JAMES C 10/03/96 13.96 0210674 KENT, STEPHEN E 10/03/96 20.80 0210675 CRAWFORD, STANLEY 10/03/96 19.24 0210676 SANCHEZ, LYDIA 10/03/96 72.99 0210677 MC CLARY, ROBERT S 10/03/96 46.06 0210678 FURROWS, RACHEL 10/03/96 20.05 0210679 BOEHLKE, PAIGE 10/03/96 82.01 0210680 PERRON, ETTA 10/03/96 7.39 0210681 RAITI, CHRISTOPHER M 10/03/96 30.46 9 OCTOBER 15, 1996 600K 99 PAGE 407 BOOK 99 pnE 408 CHECK NAME CHECK CHECK NUMBER DATE AMOUNT 0210682 BEAZER HOMES FLORIDA INC 10/03/96 121.41 0210683 SIMARD, DALE E 10/03/96 62.64 0210684 REYNOLDS, LAWRENCE 10/03/96 76.16 0210685 CHAMBLISS JR, HENRY 10/03/96 19.08 0210686 WILLIAMS, DAVID G 10/03/96 46.87 0210687 HARBOR FEDERAL 10/03/96 73.24 0210688 FREEMAN, MELLISSA ANN 10/03/96 100.56 0210689 LINCOLN, VALERIE 10/03/96 51.56 0210690 TOMMY'S TRANSMISSION 10/03/96 24.59 0210691 ANDERSON, FRED A 10/03/96 14.40 0210692 RODRIGUEZ, RAMON L 10/03/96 15.10 0210693 AMMONDS, OLIVIA 10/03/96 70.04 1,046,433.88 C. Emergency Purchase of Xerox Copier The Board reviewed the following memo dated 10/4/96: DATE: October 4, 1996 TO: Honorable Board of County Commissioners THRU: James E. Chandler County Administrator FROM: H.T. "Sonny" Dean, Director, 4 Department of General Services SUBJECT: Emergency Purchase of Xerox Copier The Department of Community Development's copier failed and the cost for repairs was not feasible. During the effort to replace the equipment, staff located a Xerox copier that had been used during the recent Olympics in Atlanta and was being offered at a reduced price. This machine was on a government contract at $13,677.00 and Xerox would sell it to the County for $7,555.00. The Purchasing Manual requires all expenditures over $5,000.00 to be bid. Exceptions to this requirement are sole source, governmental contracts, and emergencies. Staff felt this was an emergency due to closing of the fiscal year, department need and a very good price on the machine. The County Administrator was in agreement and authorized purchase of the equipment. In accordance with Section 3.11 C of the County's Purchasing Manual, when action such as above is taken, the Board must be advised. This memorandum is submitted as meeting requirements of the Manual. ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by Commissioner Bird, the Board unanimously approved the emergency purchase of the Xerox Copier in the amount of $7,555, as recommended by staff. 10 OCTOBER 15, 1996 D. Removal of Tank Traps from South Beach by Army Corps of Engineers The Board reviewed the following memo dated 10/9/96: TO: James E. Chandler, County Administrator CONSENT AGENDA FROM: James W. Davis, P.E. - Public Works Director SUBJECT: Removal of Horned Scullies (Tank Traps) from South Beach - Approval of Right -of -Entry for Construction - Department of the Army - Round Island Park REF. LETTER: Bart J. Wivell, Department of Army, to Chip Boyette dated Oct. 4, 1996 DATE: October 9, 1996 DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS In order to remove the homed scullies from the South Beach area, the Department of the Army is requesting permission to use Round Island Park to access the beach and stage equipment. All damage to the site will be repaired prior to the Army's contractor leaving the area. The attached "Right -of -Entry for Construction" form has been submitted as authorization. RECOMMENDATIONS AND FUNDING Staff recommends that the Board approve the Right -of -Entry and authorize the Chairman's signature. No local funding is applicable. The Department of the Army is funding the project in the amount of approximately $350,000. ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by Commissioner Bird, the Board unanimously approved the Right -of -Entry for Construction, as recommended by staff. RIGHT -OF -ENTRY IS ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD OCTOBER 15, 1996 11 BOOK. 1 99 PAGE 409 sooK 00 FAr, E410 PUBLIC HEARING - ORDINANCE REZONING 4.2 ACRES FROM CL TO CG - PARADISE CENTRAL CORP. AND 510/512 HOLDINGS INC. PAILSS-AWMAM PubRAW Dolly Vero Beach, Biba AWw Can", AwMa COUMY OFM M MVM- STATE OF FLORM oath eeye rent m P mm Ta P.eaEJarnel. a deBy ne�a� pply,e0�� yep BeeFh m h,pe, fine C— y. Fb ft pmt ala ettedlad Copy m ems. b" tlthe CWL raaP4 eaheemaetl rewapapemd»mmeam �F7>, yr l99'L 98AtreM n 'naR sap MM the sM Pmss Wrta is a n"q=W PE4SImd at V" Beedt h CaladY, Fiortle. and dmt ma Wd newspaper hea tematea baa, a aass � m�esmen ahs Calmly. Faill& each defy amp tee beat aMeep ea lar a read m pre year r paOB m very Seats. ti aetl eldlml Mer Camly. Flatlet advertmewM: and of and fur&w le hu neem r�mrpatl pim�tleeda pareari, prof e capes mq dmmao. rebgt —risaion a rmetl fm ft pwpp a seadr4 ilia bates M NOTICE PUBLIC HP-Atf40 The Board Of Commhsioners Of loan River COunty, Florida, wil OorWer the adoCL.ptlon Of CiOlmfinert�81 ohtrlot Gerheral Commercial District. The abject prapelty Is presently owned by 5101512 Hol Inc. and Paradise Central Carpo- radon. ThemerSUb h located at the south- east coof CR 51 and tit 512, and mains apprmdrnately 4.2 acres. The su�act property Yes h► the southwest w section of section 23. Town- ship 31S, Rarhge 3M "V and beteg in htdhrh Riv4 at which parties in interest and dAmP athel have an opporbnity to be heard, will be held by the Board of CoM Comrdsolorms of Indian River C*M. Florida, in Corinis- shrh Chwtmn of the Adndr�iistradon Build. bhg, lOgated at 1040 25th 1Street Vero Back Flor. The orocosed orAtnarre to r �ion�'11@ -&fiMr!t AN ORDINANCE OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA. AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE AND THE ACCOMPANYING ZONING MAP FROM CL TO CG, FOR PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF CR 510• AND CR 512, AND DESCRIBED HEREIN, AND PROVIDING FOR EFFECTIpVE DATE.The bbyy the phbfic dirihp ragtrlar business horftw= may �wure d floe of tlhe QeerrTTcc to the Bard of Caniy Cpmis- 9lorhers,1840 25th Street. Vero Beach, Flodda. a he dim lo� ategoryprovided n h amner wdM the se ged use whoppeal any which mamay be maaddey at � meeU g will need to art - sure that a verbatim record of the proceedhhgs h made. which kkxJes testimony and evidence upon which the appal is based for this o the ommyW* who mde a special�Amerimm with Disabilities Act (ADA) COord nator at 587 -MM extension 223 at least 48 hors in advance of mreethgi-dan Rkw co Board mty WM -aFm R B. Adam Chalm Oft 4.1 1 1340975 Community Development Director Bob Keating presented staff's recommendation for approval of the rezoning request dated 10/1/96: 12 OCTOBER 15, 1996 M M M aWuti 2:. t997 � A'dSWTFFF�;'*•i '.�n.tm t^.tu1C. i tM fC9t�fs e.r C^^ae 4rCmm.vn.wr F.^ •rw tet I. ,an r, OF FLOr. glarca - ' *u.nm NOTICE PUBLIC HP-Atf40 The Board Of Commhsioners Of loan River COunty, Florida, wil OorWer the adoCL.ptlon Of CiOlmfinert�81 ohtrlot Gerheral Commercial District. The abject prapelty Is presently owned by 5101512 Hol Inc. and Paradise Central Carpo- radon. ThemerSUb h located at the south- east coof CR 51 and tit 512, and mains apprmdrnately 4.2 acres. The su�act property Yes h► the southwest w section of section 23. Town- ship 31S, Rarhge 3M "V and beteg in htdhrh Riv4 at which parties in interest and dAmP athel have an opporbnity to be heard, will be held by the Board of CoM Comrdsolorms of Indian River C*M. Florida, in Corinis- shrh Chwtmn of the Adndr�iistradon Build. bhg, lOgated at 1040 25th 1Street Vero Back Flor. The orocosed orAtnarre to r �ion�'11@ -&fiMr!t AN ORDINANCE OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA. AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE AND THE ACCOMPANYING ZONING MAP FROM CL TO CG, FOR PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF CR 510• AND CR 512, AND DESCRIBED HEREIN, AND PROVIDING FOR EFFECTIpVE DATE.The bbyy the phbfic dirihp ragtrlar business horftw= may �wure d floe of tlhe QeerrTTcc to the Bard of Caniy Cpmis- 9lorhers,1840 25th Street. Vero Beach, Flodda. a he dim lo� ategoryprovided n h amner wdM the se ged use whoppeal any which mamay be maaddey at � meeU g will need to art - sure that a verbatim record of the proceedhhgs h made. which kkxJes testimony and evidence upon which the appal is based for this o the ommyW* who mde a special�Amerimm with Disabilities Act (ADA) COord nator at 587 -MM extension 223 at least 48 hors in advance of mreethgi-dan Rkw co Board mty WM -aFm R B. Adam Chalm Oft 4.1 1 1340975 Community Development Director Bob Keating presented staff's recommendation for approval of the rezoning request dated 10/1/96: 12 OCTOBER 15, 1996 M M M TO: James E. Chandler County Administrator TMENT. HEAD CONCURRENCE o o e t . K a i P Community Develo ent actor THROUGH: Sasan Rohani, AICP Chief, Long -Range Planning FROM: John WachteA) Senior Planner, Long -Range Planning DATE: October 1, 1996 RE: PARADISE CENTRAL CORPORATION AND 510/512 HOLDINGS, INC.,S REQUEST TO REZONE APPROXIMATELY 4.2 ACRES FROM CL TO CG (RZON 96-07-0054) It is requested that the data herein presented be given formal consideration by the Board of County Commissioners at their regular meeting of October 15, 1996. DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS This is a request to rezone approximately 4.2 acres from CL, Limited Commercial District, to CG, General Commercial District. Located at the southeast corner of CR 510 and CR 512, the subject property is owned by Paradise Central Corporation and 510/512 Holdings, Inc. The purpose of this request is to secure the necessary zoning to add a drive-through to a fast food restaurant that is currently under construction on the site. On September 12, 1996, the Planning and Zoning Commission voted 6-0 to recommend -that the Board of County Commissioners approve this request to rezone the subject property to CG. Existinc7 Land Use Pattern An approved convenience store/fast food restaurant with fuel sales is currently under construction on the site, which is presently zoned CL. To the north and west, across CR 512 and CR 510, respectively, land is also zoned CL. That land consists of rangeland to the west and wooded areas to the north. A convenience store with fuel sales exists at the northwest corner of the intersection of CR 510 and CR 512. Land abutting the site on the south and east is zoned A-1, Agricultural District (up to 1 unit/5 acres) and consists of an inactive grove.- OCTOBER 15, 1996 13 BOOK, 99 PACE -411 s®ox 99 PnE 412 Future Land Use Pattern The subject property and properties to the north and west, across CR 512 and CR 510, respectively, are designated C/I, Commercial/ Industrial on the future land use map. The C/I designation permits various commercial and industrial zoning districts. Land to the south and east of the subject property is designated L-1, Low - Density Residential -1, on the future land use map. The L-1 designation permits residential uses with a density of up to 3 units/acre. Environment The site is currently under construction. Prior to that, it had been cleared for agriculture. Therefore, the site contains no native habitat. According to Flood Insurance Rating Maps, the subject property is not within a flood hazard area. Utilities and Services The site is within the Urban Service Area of the county. Water lines extend to the site from the South County Reverse Osmosis Plant. When completed, the North County Reverse Osmosis Plant will serve the site. Wastewater lines from the North Regional Wastewater Treatment Plant also extend to the site. Transportation System The subject property abuts CR 510 and CR 512. Both of those roads are two lane paved roads that are classified as urban principal arterial roadways on the future roadway thoroughfare plan map. This segment of CR 510 has approximately 100 feet of existing public road right-of-way. The portion of CR 512 that abuts the site has approximately 120 feet of existing public road right-of- way. A five lane widening project for CR 512 from I-95 to Roseland Road is scheduled to commence in late 1997. No expansion of CR 510 is currently programmed. Zoning District Differences There are many similarities and some differences between the existing CL zoning district and the proposed CG district. The CL district is intended to serve, and be more compatible with, nearby residential development. Therefore, in terms of permitted uses, the CL district is generally more restrictive. In contrast, the CG district allows somewhat more intense commercial development. The differences between the districts are best illustrated by their purpose statements. These purpose statements are as follows: • CL, Limited Commercial District. The CL, limited commercial district is intended to provide areas for the development of restricted commercial activities. The CL district is intended to accommodate the convenience retail and service needs of area residents, while minimizing the impact of such activities on any nearby residential areas. • CG, General Commercial District. The CG, general commercial district, is intended to provide areas for the development of general retail sales and selected service activities. The CG district is not intended to provide for heavy commercial 14 OCTOBER 15, 1996 activities, such as commercial service uses, heavy repair services nor industrial uses. ANALYSIS In this section, an analysis of the reasonableness of the application will be presented. The analysis will include a description of: • concurrency of public facilities; • compatibility with the surrounding area; • consistency with the comprehensive plan; and • potential impact on environmental quality. Concurrency of Public Facilities This site is located within the county Urban Service Area, an area deemed suited for urban scale development. The comprehensive plan establishes standards for: Transportation, Potable Water, Wastewater, Solid Waste, Drainage and Recreation (Future Land Use Policy 3.1). The adequate provision of these services is necessary to ensure the continued quality of life enjoyed by -the community. The comprehensive plan also requires that new development be reviewed to ensure that the minimum acceptable standards for these services and facilities are maintained. Policy 3.2 of the Future Land Use Element states that no development shall be approved unless it is consistent with the concurrency management system component of the Capital Improvements Element. For rezoning requests, conditional concurrency review is required. Conditional concurrency review examines the available capacity of each facility with respect to a proposed project. Since rezoning requests are not projects, county regulations call for the concurrency review to be based upon the most intense use of the subject property based upon the requested zoning district. For commercial rezoning requests, the most intense use (according to the county's land development regulations) is retail commercial with 10,000 square feet of gross floor area per acre of land proposed for rezoning. The site information used for the concurrency analysis is as follows: 1. Size of Area to be Rezoned: ±4.2 acres 2. Land Use Designation: C/I, Commercial/Industrial 3. Existing Zoning Classification: CL, Limited Commercial 4. Proposed Zoning Classification: CG, General Commercial 5. Most Intense Use under Existing Zoning Classification: ±42,000 sq. ft. of Retail Commercial (Shopping Center in the 5th Edition ITE Manual). 6. Most Intense Use under Proposed Zoning Classification: ±42,000 sq. ft. of Retail Commercial (Shopping Center in the 5th Edition ITE Manual). As per section 910.07(2) of the Concurrency Management Chapter of the County's Land Development Regulations, projects which do not increase density or intensity of use are exempt from concurrency requirements. This rezoning request is exempt from concurrency 15 96oK 99 ?�c� *413OCTOBER 15, 1996 A. Boa 99 PAPE 414 review because the requested zoning would not increase the use intensity of the site. By changing the zoning of the subject property from CL to CG, some commercial uses not currently allowed would be permitted on the site. However, because the most intense use of the property would be the same with either zoning district, changing the property's zoning from CL to CG would not create additional impacts on any concurrency facilities. As noted, a project on the site is under construction. That project has recieved concurrency approval. If any additional development is proposed for the subject property, a more detailed concurrency analysis will be conducted during the development approval process. Compatibility with the Surrounding Area Staff's position is that both the CL and the CG zoning districts are appropriate for the CR 510/CR 512 commercial/industrial node, including the subject property. Applying either of those zoning districts to the subject property would result in development compatible with surrounding property. The principal impacts of development within this node would be on abutting land that is designated for low density residential development, but is currently zoned and used for agriculture. In the case of the subject property, such land abuts the site on the south and east. In terms of traffic generated, hours of.operation, noise, and overall intensity of use, the impacts of development under the requested CG district would be anticipated to be somewhat greater than the impacts of development under the existing CL district. -There are, however, several circumstances which would serve to mitigate the potential impacts associated with this request. Those circumstances are listed below. • Required front and rear yard setbacks ensure some separation. • Development of the site will require the installation and maintenance of buffers and landscaping. The site is large enough to accommodate required buffers. Additionally, abutting residentially designated parcels are large enough to easily buffer "themselves" from commercial development on the subject property. • All commercial development is required to undergo site plan review. Through this process, potential impacts will be minimized with site design. • The large overlap of uses permitted under both the proposed CG zoning district and the existing CL zoning district reduces the chances that granting this request will result in an increase in impacts on the surrounding area. For these reasons, the proposed rezoning is anticipated to result in development that is compatible with surrounding property. Consistency with Comprehensive Plan Rezoning requests are reviewed for consistency with all policies of the comprehensive plan. Rezonings must also be consistent with the overall designation of land uses as depicted on.the Future Land -Use Map, which include agriculture, residential, recreation, 16 OCTOBER 15, 1996 conservation, and commercial and industrial densities. Commercial and industrial land nodes throughout the unincorporated areas of land uses and their uses are located in Indian River County. The goals, objectives and policies are the most important parts of the comprehensive plan. Policies are statements in the plan which identify the actions which the county will take in order to direct the community's development. As courses of action committed to by the county, policies provide the basis for all county land development decisions. While all comprehensive plan policies are important, some have more applicability than others in reviewing rezoning requests. Of particular applicability for this request is the following policy. - Future Land Use Element Policy 1.15 Future Land Use Element Policy 1.15 states that the commercial land use designation is intended for uses such as retail and wholesale trade, offices, business and personal services, residential treatment centers, limited residential uses, and other similar type uses. In addition, that policy states that all commercial uses must be located within an existing or future urban service area. Since the subject property is located within -a commercial/ industrial node within the county's urban service area, the request is consistent with Future Land Use Element Policy 1.15. While the referenced policy is particularly applicable to this request, other comprehensive plan policies and objectives also have relevance. For that reason, staff evaluated the subject request for consistency with all plan policies and objectives. Based upon that analysis, staff determined that the request is consistent with the comprehensive plan. Potential Impact on Environmental Ouality Staff's position is that the requested zoning change will not negatively impact the environmental quality of this previously disturbed site.. Based upon its analysis, staff has determined that the environmental impacts of development of the subject property will be the same under either the current CL zoning or the requested CG zoning. CONCLUSION The requested zoning is compatible with the surrounding area, consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies of the comprehensive plan, and meets all applicable concurrency criteria. The subject property is located in an area deemed suitable for general commercial uses. The request meets all applicable criteria. For these reasons, staff supports the request. RECOMMMIDATION Based on the analysis, staff and the Planning and Zoning Commission recommend that the Board of County Commissioners approve this request to rezone the subject property from CL to CG. 17 OCTOBER 15, 1996 soox 99 P�I415 Boot 99 PAu 416 Chairman Adams asked if the retail shopping center is the same intense use in the CG as it is in CL, and Director Keating explained that the most intense use under both the existing zoning classification of CL and the proposed zoning of CG is 42,000 sq. ft. of retail commercial (shopping center in the 5th Edition ITE Manual). In the CL, however, one building in a shopping center could not be larger than 40,000 sq. ft. Chairman Adams questioned the buffer requirements, and Director Keating advised that development of the site will require the installation and maintenance of buffers and landscaping. The site is large enough to accommodate required buffers. Commissioner Macht inquired about the land use designation of the surrounding property, and Director Keating explained that it is L-1 and it is zoned Agricultural. They could come in for a variety of zoning districts such as RS -3, but we are seeing more and more of Planned Development which gives the developers more discretion in how they develop their property. The Chairman opened the Public Hearing and asked if anyone wished to be heard in this matter. There being none, she closed the Public Hearing. ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by Commissioner Bird, the Board unanimously adopted Ordinance 96-21, rezoning 4.2 acres located at the SE corner of CR -510 and CR -512 from CL to CG. ORDINANCE NO. 96- 21 AN ORDINANCE OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE AND THE ACCOMPANYING ZONING MAP FROM CL TO CG, FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF CR 510 AND CR 512, AND DESCRIBED HEREIN, AND PROVIDING FOR EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission, sitting as the local planning agency on such matters, has held a public hearing and subsequently made a recommendation regarding this rezoning request; and 18 OCTOBER 15, 1996 � � r WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida, did publish and .send its Notice of Intent to rezone the hereinafter described property; and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners has determined that this rezoning is in conformance with the Comprehensive Plan of Indian River County; and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners has held a public hearing pursuant to this rezoning request, at which parties in interest and citizens were heard; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED, by the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida, that the zoning of the following described property situated in Indian River County, Florida, to -wit: COMMENCING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 23, TOWNSHIP 31 SOUTH, RANGE 38 EAST, RUN NORTH 89053'45" WEST A DISTANCE OF 958.24 FEET; THENCE RUN SOUTH 00009'49" EAST A DISTANCE OF 43.62 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED PARCEL; THENCE CONTINUE SOUTH 89050'1111 WEST A DISTANCE OF 300. 00 FEET TO THE EASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY OF COUNTY ROAD 510; THENCE RUN NORTH 00013115" WEST A DISTANCE OF 600 FEET TO THE SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY OF STATE ROAD 512, THENCE RUN ALONG SAID STATE ROAD 512 RIGHT-OF- WAY ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE CONCAVE TO THE NORTHWEST, HAVING AN ARC LENGTH OF 301.94 FEET, A RADIUS OF 2060.00 FEET AND AN INCLUDED ANGLE OF 08023'52" TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. Be changed from CL to CG. All with the meaning and intent and as set forth and described in said Land Development Regulations. Approved and adopted by the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida, on this 15th day of October, 1996. This ordinance was advertised in the Vero Beach Press -Journal on the 4th day of October, 1996 for a the 15th day of October, 1996 at whichlltimea it was moved on adoption by Commissioner Eggert d for Commissioner gird seconded by following vote: and adopted by the 19 &OK 99 R -JI OCTOBER 15, 1996 Mot 99 Ptu 418 ORDINANCE NO. 96- 21 Chairman Fran B. Adams Ave Vice -Chairman Carolyn K. Eggert Ave Commissioner Richard N. Bird Ave Commissioner Kenneth R. Macht Ave Commissioner John W. Tippin Ave BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY BY: �8 dL;/ I�C.n Fran B. Adams, Chairman ATTEST BY: Je K. Bartgn, Clerk Acknowledgement by the Department of State of the State of Florida this 28th day of October, 1996. Effective upon filing with the Department of State. This ordinance was filed with the Department of State on the following date: October 24, 1996 InM 41 Cn Approved ' u\v\ j \mchugh. ord A dfilrl Legal f� au get Def, t. �—�--- Risk NI9r. ' G 20 OCTOBER 15, 1996 PUBLIC HEARING - PELICAN POINTE CORP.'S REQUEST FOR SPECIAL EXCEPTION USE APPROVAL AND CONCEPTUAL PD PLAN APPROVAL PRESS -JOURNAL PubWAd Daily Vero Beach bdon River Cour", forma COUNTY OF VIDIAN FffM: STATE OF FLOIWA Befe9 I* 1aldea�9netl e1N0111y peamab mad X0'1 K. Nidte vdn 011 nth Bays q51 ba b PrB6ldmt of d1e Pre9slo1Frm1, a tleAy rewee puhtahed a Yeo Be9C11 N trban RM1a Carob. Florae; dmt Ue attacbad ropy of eds1L heig a -&h Cf 00.lane w F�frt� -PDr 21R M Sa cart Was Put. Afflent lees, says tlat dla 6eH Prresa.io16r5i b e 1186�pe p661ed a Yore SBWL In canlvlaa,ay pbe6hed 6mdw mm de ma I.I, Fbrift each '0WS neemfae ham secww Gass roam nmtte m ore roe 0, Q S".'bWdCoeny Fadaaa' for a aerioo of ee ,rem neat prePeBrg ore Net p of eta atmdl6d Dopy at advmtvema,t and ~y8 mean says gat re hw =tptl Prod ran passed any Proem. aln a omporaton aq tlleWlmt, rebate. omftsion a rehnd fe the pepoee of emrtg tali -P.P. mNmitlHrent for patBcetlm b said nor c��aWin Nbmea setae me mm �'� � JF' MtF came Erptres! f �""`� Aagus12 i. 1997; MwMA MIM IMAF1•KI No CC3100a5 Yx•• n• P.T.L 1: v, em AUN 33. fM o EOF FLO. stgrcd i L/!v t ANTI A .Khat. gee /q- /01AYI9G ;UL >mUNI fiAOs 15651 SOT .w is •.: - PaJll{iCAh'P1t8LIGMEARIPIG Notice of 4".to corhsber the of ails cial Exception use approve) for a devatop mm�teynt- for •19 sin& fan* units. The subject prop- Pekan Pofnten � located in Section 21,Vernon G. Township 31 and Range 39. See the above map for the I=. tion.A =hearing at which • pertles • in Intenset and-:= d an opportunity be hh l Una Board to be hwd, . unty Commis- sion Chambers of the County Administration Build. ing, located at 1840 25th Street: Vero Beach, Flor. Ida on Tuesday, October 15, 1996 at 9:05 a.m. Anyone -who may wish to appeal any dedsbn which may be made at this meeting w® need to en- sure that a verbatm record of the proceedmgs is made, whidh includes testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is based. ANYONE WHO NEEDS A SPECIAL ACCOMMODA- TION FOR THIS MEETING MUST CONTACT THE COLWYS AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT. (MLEACOORDINAST OR AT 567-SOM )(223 AT 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE OFF THE MEET- ING. •. 1 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS BY -s -Fran B. Adana Sept 23.1996 1338294 807 Planning Director Stan Boling advised that yesterday afternoon we received a letter from the developer/applicant asking that this hearing be postponed, the reason being that they need more time to meet with the home owners' association who would like to wait until more winter residents return. ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by Commissioner Bird, the Board unanimously postponed indefinitely the public hearing scheduled for today and directed staff to readvertise at such time as the applicant resubmits his request. OCTOBER 15, 1996 21 ° 99 au 419 soon 99 PmE 420 PUBLIC HEARING - BELL SOUTH MOBILITY, INC REQUEST FOR SPECIAL EXCEPTION USE APPROVAL TO ERECT A 300 FT. TOWER MEs5.,otRIM iuWWmd Day Vero Beach, IrO= rover Ceunh. MorWa COUNTY OF MM RIVER: STATE OF FLORIDA Before Bre umasgneo aAMiry patevallr Dmryl K 19oce wtp an oath eeya Bret he b IhesmLie d th Press.laarrel. a Ba9Y rrewtipaper gotsMm nVfao Baeah m ramal Rher Camry. Fmrme: Bret Bo aneGoo ra0r d e0ratlaanera. brig e�y u'fi Cl m tlo Cam waa mm- M,—mw mmnewemw m me of Affront further says Bret tle eelm Press.lourrrel b a rewepepa MPWWb% lam n Vero Beech, In MW mmen River Caany. Fmma. em tlmt Bb aero r,e.rape,er had WOW" hear m to ty P,O ~ In cera roman Rhar Caunh. Emma real rap ane hBe earn erllaea ea see" pass I nretrer at tle post dace m Vero Beall. m sale trnmr Porer Colarty. Flatea e k m �adaml�t fug 1 r1aB+ pdem��eda'7�p fir. u caoasnoo sny mscolmt. rebore. —.Its al ar ref M for the P.,P a d creeks ft OaRrtbttrEnt for FVbkOatbn m smtl newspam l •�gutgoibeU belare me tl•w Boyd G c% °`yp•�tl' er Wtea0ewdaaW My Gomm EeBaea: � sa�nae> ,•m'•rr, �rnwl nx.x. feaLl�We�ar� kora ' Aug1e125.1997: oar N n.nna N. <„•.-.....::,> .,..er i+. 1 . lrl•(sEAu �. i. soy .�ATFQFy�P.O. Slrmee. SA. AA. 22 OCTOBER 15, 1996 NOT(CE OF RESCHEDULED PUBLIC HEA M Notice to reschedule an advertised public hearing to consider thea rZ of speow exception use approval for atower sub Kids Krusade. Ino., property is rttrho 4, Im ("Lief Y� Rand 'I In at "141 12, Town. Range 38. $ee the above map for the The pubs hearing at which parties In interest and Citizens shall have an opporhdhity to be heard, will be held by the -Board of Camly Correrhlssfoners of Indlan Rim County, lchL in the County Corn- rnISSion ClhamberS O the Courq Admin(stretion Building, located at 1840 25th Street, Vero Beach, Florida on Tu October ,5 The ad*d public5,998 at 9.05 am sched- uled 8.19 � leg* h d er (� , Octo- berAnyone who may wish to which may be rnade at SM thatverbatim rid of ft made, which includes tesW►any and evidence hrpon which the appy Is based. ANYONE 1NH0 NEEDS A SPECIAL ACCOMMODA- TION FOR THIS MEETING MUST CONTACT THE COUNTY'S AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT (ADA) COORDINATOR AT 5674000 X223 AT LEAST 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE OF THE MEET. INti. t INDIAN RIVER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS BY -S -Fran B. Adam Oct, 2, 1998 1340488 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA M E M O R A N D U M TO: James Chandler County Administrator DIS ON HEAD CONCURRENCE: 11.9 ///// 0'�Otflf4, IS Kea ng, AI ector Community IN ent D, THROUGH: Stan Boling, AICP Planning Director FROM: Eric Blad /-1 Staff Planner, Current Development DATE: October 9, 1996 SUBJECT: Bell South Mobility Inc. Is Request for Special Exception Use Approval to Erect a 300' Tower (Vero -4) It is requested that the data herein presented be given formal consideration by the Board of County Commissioners at its regular meeting of October 15, 1996. DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS: Bruce Barkett, Esq., on behalf of Bell South Mobility, Inc., has submitted -an application requesting site plan administrative approval and special exception use approval to construct an unmanned 300' self -supported communications tower and associated equipment building. The subject tower base is to be located approximately 379' east of 82nd Avenue and 220' north of 12th Street. The tower site is a leased area within the boundaries of property owned .by Kids Krusade, Inc. (Life for Youth Ranch) . The lease area for the proposed tower is in the southwest corner of the overall parcel, 450 feet+ from any activity areas associated with the Life for Youth Ranch youth program. Because the proposed tower exceeds 1401..in height, and because the site is located within an A-1 zoning district, special exception use approval must be granted for the construction of the tower. *Planning and Zoning Commission Consideration The special exception use request has been scheduled for consideration by the Planning and Zoning Commission on October 10, 1996. Staff's recommendation to the Planning and Zoning Commission is to approve the request with the conditions contained in the recommendation at the end of this report. At the October 15, 1996 Board of County Commissioners meeting, planning staff will report on the Planning and Zoning Commission's action. *Board of County Commissioners Consideration Upon consideration of the recommendation of staff and the Planning and Zoning Commission, the Board is to approve, approve with conditions, or deny the special exception use request. Pursuant to Section 971.05 of the LDRs, the Board of County Commissioners is to consider the appropriateness of the requested use for the subject site and surrounding area. The County may attach any conditions 23 �. OCTOBER 15, 1996 660K 99 PAGE 21 900K 99 PACE 422 and- safeguards necessary to mitigate impacts and to ensure compatibility of the use with the surrounding area. Staff has reviewed the submitted proposal and has granted site plan administrative approval for the tower, subject to the Board's granting of special exception use approval and any conditions. attached to that approval. Therefore, the administrative site plan approval will become .effective if and when the Board of County Commissioners grants special exception use approval. ANALYSIS: 1. Land Use Designation: AG -1, Agricultural (up to 1 unit per 5 acres) 2. Zoning Classification: A-1, Agricultural (up to 1 unit per 5 acres) 3. Area of Development: Krusade, Inc.) 4. Subject Parcel Area: 0.38 acres (lease area from Kids t40 acres (Kids Krusade Inc. parcel) 5. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: North: Vacant/A-1 South: Vacant/A-1 East: Vacant/A-1 West: Vacant/A-1 Note: A pavilion and unpaved access driveway serving Life for Youth Ranch are located 450'+ to the east and north of the tower. 6. Airport Zoning Ordinance Regulations: The proposed 300' tower would extend into one of the county's "height notification zones." Pursuant to the county's height notification and other airport zoning ordinance regulations, the applicant has been notified that it must file a notice of proposed construction form with the FAA (Federal Aviation Administration), obtain the FAA's determination and comments on the proposed tower, and obtain from county staff either an "airport construction permit" or an "airport obstruction variance". At this time, the applicant has stated to staff that the appropriate notification information has been filed with the FAA. The applicant has acknowledged that, upon receipt of the FAA's determination, it will apply for a county "airport construction permit". Prior to site plan release, the applicant must obtain a county "airport construction permit" or "airport construction variance". 7. Building Area: 432 sq. ft. (unmanned, electrical equipment building) 8. Traffic Circulation: The site is to be accessed from 12th Street via a private driveway that will serve the tower site only. The driveway will be placed in an ingress/egress access easement that will traverse the Kids Krusade site and connect the Bell South Mobility lease area to 12th Street. Prior to site plan -release, the applicant must have the easement recorded in the public records. Traffic engineering has approved the proposed project access. 24 OCTOBER 15, 1996 9. - Off -Street Parking: Required: 2 unpaved Provided: 2 unpaved Note: County off-street parking regulations for towers require two (2) parking spaces. The spaces may be fully sodded or otherwise stabilized as approved by the Public Works Director. The stabilized parking spaces provided for the subject site have been approved by the Public Works Director. 10. Landscape Plan: For towers, such as this one, that exceed 140' in height in agricultural zoning districts, the lower portion of the tower is to be screened by landscaping. Existing trees along the perimeter of the Kids Krusade parcel will provide the required screening initially. However, in order to ensure future screening of the tower base from 12th Street and 82nd Avenue, in the event the trees on the Kids Krusade parcel are removed in the future, oak trees are proposed to be planted along the south and west perimeters of the tower lease area. Therefore, the specific land use landscaping criterion of section 971.44(2) are satisfied. 11. Stormwater Management: The Stormwater Management Plan has been approved by the Public Works Department. 12. Utilities: The proposed site is outside of the utilities service area. Given the type of use, no water or wastewater services are required. Therefore, the County Utilities Department has no objection to approval of the site plan and use request. 13. Health & Rehabilitative Services (HRS): The HRS Environmental Health Unit acknowledges that the site will not require a potable water supply or sanitary facility, and has no objections to approval of the site plan and use request. 14. Specific Land Use Criteria: The applicant must satisfy the following specific land use criteria which apply to the erection of a tower exceeding 140' in height within a A-1 zoning district. A. General criteria for all towers exceeding 70' in height. 1. All towers not related to amateur radio communications use shall have setbacks from all property lines equal to one hundred ten (110) percent of the height of the proposed structure. This setback provision may be waived or modified if the applicant submits a certified, signed and sealed statement from a Florida registered professional engineer stating that the tower would collapse within the designed and specified fall radius depicted on the plans. Towers related to amateur radio communication use need only satisfy building setbacks for the zoning district in which the tower is located. -This less stringent setback provision is in recognition of the FCC's PRB-1 preemption for amateur radio communications. Note: The tower's design fall radius is 65' and the tower is set back 185' from the nearest property line. 25 BOOK 99 P�� t X23 OCTOBER 15, 1996 6ca 99 . PAPE 424 2. In cases where the tower is not related to amateur radio communications use, the fall radius (one hundred ten (110) percent of the tower height or other approved design fall radius) shall not encroach upon existing off-site structures or adjacent residentially designated property; Note: No such encroachments will occur. 3. The distance of any guy anchorage or similar device shall be at least f ive ( 5 ) f eet f rom any property line; 4. All accessory structures shall be subject to the height restrictions provided in Accessory uses, Chapter 917; 5. If more than two hundred twenty (220) voltage is necessary for the operation of the facility and is present in a ground grid or in the tower, signs located every twenty (20) feet and attached to the fence or wall shall display in large bold letters the following: "HIGH VOLTAGE - DANGER"; 6. No equipment, mobile or immobile, which is not used in direct support of the transmission or relay facility shall be stored or parked on the site unless repairs to the facility are being made (applies only on A-1, A-2, or A-3 zoned property); 7. No tower shall be permitted to encroach into or through any established public or private airport approach path as provided in the airport height limitations. All proposed towers shall satisfy the airport zoning ordinance requirements. 8. Towers proposed to be located in the RFD, RS -1, RS - 2, RS -3, RS -6, RT -6, RM -3, RM -4, RM -6, RM -8, RM -10, RMH-6, RMH-8, Con -2, Con -3, R-BCID, AIR -1, and .ROSE -4 zoning districts shall be accessory to the principal site use and shall meet standard building code requirements for structures. B. Specific criteria for towers over 140' in height requiring special exception use approval. 1. Suitable protective anti -climb fencing and a landscape planting screening shall be provided and maintained around the structure and accessory attachments. Where the first fifty (50) feet of a tower is visible to the public, the applicant shall provide one canopy tree per three thousand (3,000) square feet of the designated fall radius. The trees shall be planted in a pattern which will obscure the base area of the tower, without conflicting with the guy wires of the tower; 2. All towers shall submit a conceptual tower lighting plan. Louvers or shields may be, required as necessary to keep light from shining down on surrounding properties. Strobe lights must be used unless prohibited by other agencies; Note: The applicant has agreed to install the least obtrusive tower lighting system allowed by OCTOBER 15, 1996 26 M M M M the FAA U. e. a combination day/night tower lighting system that provides white strobe lighting during the day and red pulsing lighting during the night) . 3. The reviewing body shall consider the impact of the proposed tower on residential subdivisions near the project site; Note: Originally, the applicant proposed placing the tower on the north side of the Kids Krusade parcel in a location close to 16th Street and residentially designated property. In response to a staff recommendation, the applicant moved the tower site to the south side of the Kids Krusade parcel, close to 12th Street and adjacent to agriculturally designated property. In staff's opinion, the proposed site is better located, away from future residential development. 4. All property owners within six hundred (600) feet of the property boundary shall receive written notice; 5. Applicants shall explain in writing why no other existing tower facility could be used to meet the applicant's transmitting/receiving needs. An application may be denied if existing tower facilities can be used; Note: The applicant has submitted justification for the proposed tower location (see attachment #4) . 6. Towers shall be designed to accommodate multiple users; 7. A condition of approval for any tower application shall be that the tower shall be available for .other parties and interests. This shall be acknowledged in a written agreement between the applicant and the county, on a form acceptable to the county, that will run with the land. Note: The applicant is currently finalizing the language of this agreement with the county attorney's office. The agreement must be finalized prior to release of the approved site plan. Each of these 15 criteria has been addressed by the applicant, subject to conditions referenced in the analysis. 16. Dedications and Improvements: The LDRs do not require any dedications or improvements connected with the proposed development of this site, and none is proposed. Based on the analysis performed, staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners grant special exception use approval for the requested tower with the following conditions: 1. That prior to site plan release, the applicant shall obtain either a county "airport construction permit" or "airport construction variance". 27 600K 99 Pari X25 OCTOBER 15, 1996 PFJ _I 8.00K 99 pnu 426 2. - That prior to site plan release, the applicant shall document to the satisfaction of the county attorney's office, the following: a. The language of all easements necessary to serve the proposed tower must be approved by the county attorney's office, and subsequently recorded in the public records. b. The tower shall be available for other parties and interests. This availability shall be acknowledged in a written agreement between the applicant and the county, on a form acceptable to the county, that will run with the land. C. The tower shall be provided with the least obtrusive lighting system allowed by the FAA, as described under item 14.B.2. of this report. Planning Director Boling advised that there is an additional condition to the two conditions set out in staff's recommendation for approval: Condition #3 -- If the tower is abandoned for 12 months or more, it must be dismantled and removed from the site. Chairman Adams mentioned a letter from Cox about justification She believed it says nothing about why the tower is needed, just why they want the tower. She noted that the County recently received another request for a tower which was denied. She was concerned that the County may have a virus with all the requests for towers that are being received. Director Boling explained the ownership and sites of the 6 towers that have been approved by the County in 1996, noting that this request, if approved, would be the 7th one this year. Chairman Adams recalled that recently a tower located out of the county had collapsed on itself and fell further out than calculations had anticipated. She was concerned that something similar might happen at the Life for Youth Ranch, and was no longer comfortable with the number of feet in the fall radius. Commissioner Eggert recalled that something was being added to that tower by a crane and the crane had fallen. Director Boling explained about wind load requirements and advised that if the tower should fall, it would fall within a 60 - ft. radius. Chairman Adams opened the Public Hearing and asked if anyone wished to be heard in this matter. 28 OCTOBER 15, 1996 Bruce Barkett, attorney for the applicant, introduced Jo Ellen Cox, Bell South Mobility real estate project manager, two engineers, and Reverend Dick Davis, director of the Life for Youth Ranch. Attorney Barkett explained that the tower that fell was a 1500 ft. guy tied tower and it fell down because a crane servicing it fell and pulled down the guy wires. The tower did not collapse. It was the crane that fell further out of the radius, not the tower. Attorney Barkett proceeded to present his arguments for special exception use approval for the tower, noting that Bell South Mobility had changed previous plans on a possible site location and searched for a tower site further to the south. The Planning & Zoning Commission voted unanimously to recommend approval of this site at its meeting of October 10, 1996. Reverend Davis of the Life for Youth Ranch will be the landlord for this site. Attorney Barkett introduced Ren Sheppard of Boca Raton to present justification for the need of the tower. Mr. Sheppard explained that the AT&T tower, which is close to the St. Lucie County line, would not give them the coverage they need. He displayed a map of the area showing the dead spots in coverage, noting that the large gap in coverage is pretty much along I-95 and west of I-95. Another gap in coverage is along SR -60 where they are controlled by the FAA height restrictions for airport routes. The proposed tower will improve 911 service along I-95 where service is spotty. Chairman Adams asked why the justification letter from Cox wasn't in today's backup material. Attorney Barkett interjected that the justification letter was attached to the application; it wasn't their fault that it wasn't included in the backup material. Reverend Dick Davis, director of Life for Youth Ranch, advised that they bought this property 25 years ago. When they did their site plan, they located all their activities and buildings toward the center of the property leaving a good buffer zone to whatever or whoever might become their neighbor. If they could get some money from this buffer zone, it would be of great help. They feel that they are making good use of the buffer area and also filling a need. He felt it fits right in with the Life for Youth Ranch. Dave Hearndon, 7801 12th Street, owner of neighboring property presently zoned R-3, planned to sell his property in the future and believed that having this tower right next door would not look so OCTOBER 15, 1996 29 BOOK 99 pn-427 s©DK9 -E 428 good to a potential buyer. He suggested that Bell South Mobility build the tower at the north end of the property. Commissioner Bird believed that everything on the east side of 82nd Avenue is zoned agricultural at 1 unit per 5 acres. Bill Abernathy, owner of property just to the east of Life for Youth Ranch, believed the property on the east side of 82nd Avenue was rezoned to R-3 about 5 or 6 years ago. He had understood that all the property behind him and to the east would be developed at that density. Commissioner Bird explained that Mr. Abernathy's property was zoned Agriculture at 1 unit per 5 acres, and Director Keating recalled that it had been zoned at 1 unit per acre until negotiations with DCA resulted in it being zoned to 1 unit per 5 acres. Community Development Director Bob Keating advised that area to the east was zoned 1 unit per 1 acre and was rezoned to 1 unit per 5 acres after negotiations with the Florida Department of Community Affairs. Mr. Abernathy asked if he could get his property taxes reduced if that was the case, and Chairman Adams advised that he could get his agricultural exemption if there was an agricultural use on the property. There being no others who wished to be heard in this matter, Chairman Adams closed the Public Hearing. Chairman Adams, because of her concern over the proliferation of towers being built in this county, suggested that the County place a 90 -day moratorium on accepting applications for towers until further workshops are held to determine where towers will be needed in the county. Attorney Vitunac advised that the Board could not impose a moratorium without going through the ordinance process which means advertising and holding a public hearing. Commissioner Bird wondered if a 90 -day delay would be fair to this particular application, but Chairman Adams emphasized that the Board has the power to deny the application today. Commissioner Tippin agreed with Commissioner Bird. While he didn't like the towers and would like to see a moratorium, he felt it would be unfair to this particular applicant who has gone through all the procedures. Chairman Adams wondered about the reason for the rush on this particular application and why today's Agenda backup material did 30 OCTOBER 15, 1996 not include the Cox justification letter. She was not comfortable with this coming to the Board in a rush. It is a 300 -ft. tower and she felt it is very important to the Life for Youth Ranch. Chairman Adams felt we are moving too fast on this application and stated that she could not vote for this as it stands. She preferred to look at it on an overall basis. Director Keating suggested, if the Board wanted staff to come back with complete technical information, that we get a consultant on board. Chairman Adams didn't mind having a consultant on this matter, but..... Attorney Barkett interjected that they have gone the extra mile with this application. They were here last year with an application for a tower near the industrial park and after concerns were raised about microwaves, staff suggested they look for a location further south. They resubmitted their application and they are entitled to be judged by the rules already in place. Attorney Barkett emphasized that it would be unfair and unjust to delay this application; he believed it also would be illegal. Commissioner Macht doubted it would be illegal because the Board could make a case for safety. Chairman Adams repeated her concern about the proliferation of towers being built in this county. Chairman Adams reopened the Public Hearing. Mr. Abernathy pointed out that the zoning there is kind of vague. He wondered why this is not consistent with the proposed zoning if it is consistent with the present zoning. Director Boling explained that it is a matter of looking at future residents because eventually there will be more people residing on property to the north of this site. Commissioner Bird felt it would take quite a lot of justification to rezone that property because it would have to go along with a Comp Plan Land Use amendment. It was determined that no others wished to be heard in this matter, and Chairman Adams closed the Public Hearing. MOTION WAS MADE by Chairman Adams, SECONDED by Commissioner Eggert, to table this application for 90 days. 31 OCTOBER 15, 1996 Boos 99 PA.cE 429 I Boas 99 430 Under discussion, Commissioner Eggert stated she was reconsidering her second on the motion because she felt we do owe a vote on this application. However, she did wish we had an answer to why this was brought to us in such a rush. Chairman Adams believed it gives an appearance there is something else involved. She preferred to put it off because she could not support it as it stands. Director Keating made the following points: 1) the applicant changed the location at staff's suggestion; 2) staff had missed the advertising for the Planning & Zoning Commission meeting by one day and it had to be readvertised; 3) the applicant should not be penalized for staff's failure to include the Cox letter in with today's backup. Chairman Adams felt that still doesn't excuse the back up material not being provided because it gives a bad appearance. THE CHAIRMAN CALLED FOR THE QUESTION. The Motion failed by a 2-3 vote, Commissioners Bird, Macht and Tippin voting in dissent. MOTION WAS MADE by Commissioner Bird, SECONDED by Commissioner Tippin, to approve staff's recommendation with the criteria outlined. Under discussion, Commissioner Macht suggested the Motion include the condition that no unreasonable requirements will be imposed on a corollary user. COMMISSIONERS BIRD AND TIPPIN AGREED TO ADD THE CONDITION TO THEIR MOTION. THE CHAIRMAN CALLED FOR THE QUESTION. The Motion passed by a 4-1 vote, Chairman Adams dissenting. MOTION WAS MADE by Chairman Adams, SECONDED by Commissioner Tippin, that the Board not consider any further towers until workshops have been held and we have a tower plan. Under discussion, Chairman Adams stated she was not very comfortable in giving up any kind of responsibility the Commission has in issuing special exemptions or administrative use approval or anything else for the towers. It is the Board's responsibility and 32 OCTOBER 15, 1996 we need to accept that and not just leave it at P&Z and shrug our shoulders and say we cannot do anything. Director Keating advised that the LDR public hearings will be held during first part of December. Commissioner Eggert inquired about a time frame for getting a consultant, and Director Keating said that depends on whether we have to do a RFP (request for proposal) to bring a consultant on board. Chairman Adams felt that unless the consultant has the ability to tell us what towers need to come in, she would prefer hearing people from the industry say what they would need to provide coverage in this county. Commissioner Macht emphasized that we need coverage because the County's 800 megahertz system is deeply involved. He suggested that we give staff a chance to come back and recommend what they feel is needed. He felt that the industry itself is a good source of data. Administrator Chandler advised that we are not ready to fill the new telecommunications position that was authorized. Chairman Adams questioned Attorney Vitunac on what the Board would need to do to legally impose a 90 -day delay on any further tower applications. Attorney Vitunac advised that there are two ways: 1) Adopt an ordinance, with all the formalities of an ordinance, stating the reasons; and, 2) Go ahead and accept applications in the normal course of business and treat them with whatever rights they get by applying at that time. Director Boling advised that one more tower applicant, American Tower Systems - southeast of Fellsmere, is scheduled to be heard next week at the meeting of the Planning & Zoning Committee. ON ADVICE OF ATTORNEY VITUNAC THAT THE MOTION ON THE FLOOR WAS NOT LEGAL, CHAIRMAN ADAMS AND COMMISSIONER TIPPIN WITHDREW THEIR MOTION ON THE FLOOR. ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by Commissioner Tippin, the Board unanimously agreed to accept applications but wait to process them until after a workshop is held which is to occur as quickly as it reasonably can. On the question of bringing on a consultant, Commissioner Bird felt we need to give direction to staff to have that kind of Ix OCTOBER 15, 1996 3 3 Bo®� 99 PACE 431 BOOK 99 PAGE 492 expertise at their disposal on an independent basis, and the Board indicated their agreement. DAVID PALMER'S REQUEST TO HOLD SKATEBOARDING EVENT IN WAL-MART PARKING LOT The Board reviewed the following letter dated 10/8/96: 10/08/96 County Administrator's Office County Building Vero Beach, FL 32960 To whom it may concern, This is a written request to be place on the October -15th Indian River County Commissioners meeting. The reason for the request is to ask the County Commissioners to Grandfather the Treasure Coast Open (A skateboarding contest and demo) into their new ruling of restrictions that have been placed on the Wal-mart/Sams parking lot. Under this new judgement that the County Commissioners have place with Wal -mart, our planned Treasure Coast Open can not take place. I along with many positive sponsors have made serious financial investments into this event as well as involvment with many outside parties. In understanding why the new restrictions to Wal -mart were applied, The sponsors of the Treasure Coast Open and I do not feel that this event planned for the young people (who never really has anything organized for them) and the community should be punished for other parties actions. This event means alot to many young people and would like to continue this event as planned with all the proper permits needed. By grandfather this event in, the County Commissioners will allow so many young people to host a spectacular event. Si ere , David N. Palmer Event Coordinator P.O. Box 6398 Vero Beach, FL 32960 (407) 778-1002 34 OCTOBER 15, 1996 M M M David Palmer explained that over a month and a half ago he received verbal agreement from Ray Gent, Wal-Mart store manager, to use their parking lot for the Treasure Coast Open. At that time he was not aware of the parking lot issue, and Mr. Gent told him that a temporary use permit would be needed plus proof of insurance for the event. Mr. Palmer understood that recent action by the Board of County Commissioners has prohibited the issuance of temporary use permits for outside sales or events on the Wal-Mart site. His purpose in coming here today is to ask the Board to grandfather in a temporary use permit for this skateboarding contest and demo. Mr. Palmer emphasized that they have been working with the Substance Abuse Council and have support from other community organizations and businesses, such as Walt Disney Resort in Wabasso. Commissioner Bird reported that Mr. Palmer made a great plea for this at the recent meeting of the Parks & Recreation Committee. ON MOTION by Commissioner Tippin, SECONDED by Commissioner Bird, the Board unanimously granted Mr. Palmer's request for a one-time only temporary use permit for this event because this request was pending before the decision was made by the BCC on October 1, 1996 to prohibit temporary use permits for Wal -Mart's parking lot. AWARD BID #6089 - SEBASTIAN WATER PROJECT - PHASE I The Board reviewed the following memo dated 10/2/96: DATE: October 2, 1996 TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS THRU: James E. Chandler, County Administrator H. T. "Sonny' Dean, Director General Services "I", �p FROM: Fran Boynton Powell, Purchasing Manager SUBJ: Award Bid #6089/Sebastian Phase I Water Project Utilities Department BACKGROUND INFORMATION: Bid Opening Date: Advertising Dates: Advertisement Mailed to: Replies: Statement of "No Bids" September 24, 1996 September 2, 9, 16, 24, 1996 Fifteen (15) Vendors Five (5) Vendors -0- OCTOBER 15, 1996 35 800K 99 i'a4j,r 4 j3 HOOK PALE 4.34 VENDOR BID TOTAL CORRECTED TOTAL Martin Paving $2,145,000.00 Vero Beach, FL Speegle Const. $2,537,000.00 Cocoa, FL Driveways, Inc $2,881,742.00 Titusville; FL Ric -Man Intl $2,435,177.00 $2,982,950.00 Pompano Beach, FL All American $3,288,595.00 $3,241,895.00 Concrete St Pete, FL TOTAL AMOUNT OF BID $2,145,000.00 SOURCE OF FUNDS Utilities Assessment Fund 473-000-169-285.00 ESTIMATED BUDGET $2,960,000.00 RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the bid be awarded to Martin Paving - as the lowest, most responsive and responsible bidder meeting specifications as set forth in the Invitation to Bid. In addition, staff requests Board approval of the attached Agreement as to form, when all requirements are met and approved by the County Attorney. COPY TO: Terry Pinto, Utilities Director Mike Hotchkiss, Environmental Engineer Joe Baird, Budget Director APPROVED AGENDA ITEM X"unty mes E.Chandler, Administrator FOR _/ r)-- /S•_?G team Nw CC Approved Dale Admlft V KAIp Legal 8uagei Dept. Risk Mgr. Chairman Adams commented that it was nice to see the savings on this. ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by Commissioner Bird, the Board unanimously awarded Bid #6089 in the amount of $2,145,000 and approved the agreement with Martin Paving. AGREEMENT IS ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD OCTOBER 15, 1996 GHTORD PARK YOUTH ACTIVITIES CENTER The Board reviewed the following memo dated 10/4/96: TO: Members of the Board of County Commissioners DATE: October 4, 1996 SUBJECT: GIFFORD PARK YOUTH ACTIVITIES CENTER FROM: Joseph A. Baird ' r ,' OMB Director DESCRIPTION AND CONDMONS On September 18, 1996 staff met with Dr. Hudson and Architect John Dean to discuss the Gifford Park Youth Activities Center site related costs that Indian River County would be responsible paying. Based on the meeting, staff has done a preliminary breakdown of the site cost which totals $280,481. The $280,481 in capital costs could be paid from the Optional Sales Tax. The annual operating costs of $110,000 would have to be paid from either the General Fund or the M.S.T.U. budget. For 1996/97 fiscal year the operating cost would be pro -rated and transferred from either the General Fund or M.S.T.U. contingency. A formal agreement should be drafted to set forth terms and funding of future operating costs. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends the Board of County Commissioners approve funding of the Gifford Park Youth Activities Center site cost in the amount of $280,481 from the Optional Sales Tax 1996/97 budget. 37 600K 99 RAA , •� OCTOBER 15, 1996 BOOK 99 PnE 436 GIFFORD PARK YOUTH ACTIVITIES CENTER PROPOSED GIFFORD YOUTH ACTIVITIES CENTER.SECEIVED ANNUAL ESTIMATED BUDGET po" Budget OY?tcr. ANNUAL BENEFIT/OTHER STAFF TITt.r SALARY EEBSi?NNELCOSTs ESTIMATED COSTS UTILITY IMPACT FEES & OTHER COSTS TIE IN 10 FT. FROM BLDG. $14,023 ROAD IMPACT FEES $5,902 SITE PLAN PERMITTING COSTS $500 ENGINEERING ENG. $3,500; ST. JOHNS $350• PERK $250• SITE WORK $1,000; INSPECTION $2,200 $7,300 SURVEYING $3,000 CLEARING INCLUDING PART OF THE WOODED AREA $8,000 FILL & EARTH WORK $30,000 DRAINAGE $25,000 PARKING -PAVED 70 SPACES Q$1,000 - 50 SPACES @ $400 - PARKING ISLES $100,000 GRASS 80,000 SQ. FT Q .13 $10,400 LIGHTING FOR PARKING LOT AND AROUND BUILDING $1,000 PER LIG $10,000 LANDSCAPING $10,000 IRRIGATION $7,000 FENCING 1,200 LF Q $10.00 $12,000 IMPROVED ENTRANCE & DRIVE UP TO FACILITY $5,000 ELECTRIC TO BUILDING MAYBE NEED A NEW TRANSFORMER & CHANGE SERVICE AT PARK $3,000 SIDEWALKS AND CURBING $5,000 WATER/SEWER LINES/LIFT STATION $9,000 PAYPHONE $500 SIGNAGE $1,000 SOLID WASTE PAD $500 SUB -TOTAL $267,125 CONTINGENCY - 5% $13,356 TOTAL $280,481 PROPOSED GIFFORD YOUTH ACTIVITIES CENTER.SECEIVED ANNUAL ESTIMATED BUDGET po" Budget OY?tcr. ANNUAL BENEFIT/OTHER STAFF TITt.r SALARY EEBSi?NNELCOSTs TQTA1. Director/Program Manager $35,000.00 $6,240 00 $41,240.00 Secretary 17,000.00 5,275.00 22,775.00 Custodial/Maintenance 19,400.00 5,365.00 2420M TOTAL SALARY, BENEFIT/OR PERSONNEL COSTS —»»..•..».....».588,780.00 Comprehensive Insurance......................................................................$6,000.00 Workers' Compensation......................................................................... 2.80 00 TOTAL INSURANCE» ......................... Utilities ---(Electricity, Sewerage/Water, Sanitation...............................$7,000.00 Telephone/Fax Service .............................. ........................................... 1,500.00 Supplies/Materiais....................................................... ......................... 2,420.00 Postage................................................................................................ 500.00 TraveUMiscellaneous TOTAL UTILITIES & MISCELLANEOUS...».,,»»»,,,,,,,,,,,,„, TOTAL ANNUAL ESTIMATED BUDGET .....»....... «..... ............. S11%fiff 00 38 OCTOBER 15, 1996 1 ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by Commissioner Bird, the Board unanimously approved funding of the $280,481 in capital costs from the Optional Sales Tax 1996/97 budget. Director Baird advised that the operating costs for 1996-97 would have to be pro -rated and come out of either the General Fund or the M.S.T.U. budget. There is a possibility the building will be completed before the end of the 1996-97 fiscal year, and he would be bringing back the operating costs. Chairman Adams noted that in the meantime, there is a possibility we may get some grant monies for the operational costs. OCTOBER 15, 1996 Boa 99 PATE 438 RESOLUTIONS TO PROVIDE FOR PAVING & DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS AND SET PUBLIC HEARING DATE FOR 6TH LANE 40TH AVENUE SW AND DEUCE COURT IN WEST SIDE SUBDIVISION The Board reviewed the following memo dated 10/7/96: TO: James Chandler County Administrator DATE: October 7, 1996 THROUGH: James W. Davis, P.E. Public Works Director 1 and Roger D. Cain, P.E. County Engineer FROM: Michelle A. Gentile, CET Civil Engineer SUBJECT: Resolutions to Provide for the Paving and Drainage Improvements to and set Public Hearing date for 6th Lane, 40th Avenue SW (South of 5th Street SW) and Deuce Court located in West Side Subdivision - IRC Project No. 9521 DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS The County Public Works Department has received a petition for a public improvement assessment for road paving and drainage improvements for 6th Lane, 40th Avenue (South of 5th Street SW) and Deuce Court located in West Side Subdivision. This is a private subdivision and after the improvements are made, Indian River County will take over the maintenance of these roads and drainage easements. The petition was signed by owners of 17 of the 17 properties in the proposed benefited area. This represents 100% of the parcels in the proposed benefited area who are in favor of having this road paved. A separate resolution will need to be adopted to hold a Public Hearing to discuss the advisability, cost and amount of the assessment against each property owner. This Public Hearing has been scheduled for Tuesday, November 5, 1996, at 9:05 A.M. in the County Commission Chambers. An assessment roll and plat has been prepared and filed with the Clerk to the Board of County Commissioners. A Preliminary Estimate has been prepared and the cost has been estimated to be $76,389.16. RECOMMENDATION AND FUNDING It is recommended that the Board: 1), . Adopt the resolution providing for the paving and drainage improvements for the projects subject to the terms outlined in the resolution. The applicable interest rate shall be established by the Board of County Commissioners at the time the final assessment roll is approved. 2) Allocate $76,389.16 from the Petition Paving Account #111-214-541-035.39. 3) Adopt a resolution setting the time and place of the Public Hearing. OCTOBER 15, 1996 40 M M ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by Commissioner Tippin, the Board unanimously approved staff's recommendation and allocated $76,389.16 from the Petition Paving Account #111-214-541-035.39 and adopted Resolutions 96-128 and 96-129 providing for paving and drainage improvements and setting public hearing date for 6th Lane, 40th Avenue SW and Deuce Court in West Side Subdivision. Providing (First Reso.) RESOLUTION NO. 96-128 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, PROVIDING FOR CERTAIN PAVING AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS TO 6TH LANE, 40TH AVENUE SW (SOUTH OF 5TH STREET SW) AND DEUCE COURT LOCATED IN THE WEST SIDE SUBDIVISION, PROVIDING THE TOTAL ESTIMATED COST, METHOD OF PAYMENT OF ASSESSMENTS, NUMBER OF ANNUAL INSTALLMENTS, AND LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF THE AREA SPECIFICALLY BENEFITED. WHEREAS, the County Public Works Department has been petitioned for Road Paving and Drainage Improvement for 6th Lane, 40th Avenue SW (South of 5th Street SW) and Deuce Court located in West Side Subdivision. WHEREAS, the construction of paving and drainage improvements by special assessment funding is authorized by Chapter 206, Section 206.01 through 206.09, Indian River County Code; and cost estimates and preliminary assessment rolls have been completed by the Public Works Department; and the total estimated cost of the proposed paving and drainage improvements is SEVENTY-SIX THOUSAND, THREE HUNDRED EIGHTY-NINE DOLLARS and SIXTEEN CENTS ($76,389.16); and WHEREAS, the special assessment provided hereunder shall, for any given record owner of property within the area specially benefited, be in an amount equal to that proportion of one hundred percent (1000) of the total cost of the project ($76,389.16) which the number of parcels owned by the given owner bears to the total number of parcels within the areas specially benefited. Assessments are to be levied against all lots and lands adjoining and contiguous or bounding and abutting upon the improvements or 41 OCTOBER 15, 1996 BOOK 99 ori 439 e00K 99 mu 440 specially benefited thereby and further designated by the assessment plat with respect to the special assessments; and WHEREAS, the special assessment shall become due and payable at the Office of the Tax Collector of Indian River County ninety (90) days after the final determination of the special assessment pursuant to Section 206.08, Indian River County Code; and WHEREAS, any special assessment not paid within said ninety (90) day period shall bear interest beyond the due date at a rate established by the Board of County Commissioners at the time of preparation of the final assessment roll, and shall be payable in two (2) equal installments, the first to be made twelve (12) months from the due date and subsequent payments to be due yearly; and WHEREAS, after examination of the nature and anticipated usage of the proposed improvements, the Board of County Commissioners has determined that the following described properties shall receive a direct and special benefit from these improvement, to wit: West Side Subdivision, PBI 9-3, Lots 1-4, North 1/2 Lot 5, South 1/2 Lot 5, and Lots 6 - 15. Also, Indian River Farms Company Subdivision PBS 2-25 West 795 FT of South 432 FT of North 737 FT of West 30.38 Acres of Tract 12, Less West 100 FT (OR Book 477 Page 95) NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, as follows: 1. The foregoing recitals are affirmed and ratified in their entirety. 2. A project providing for paving and drainage improvements to 6th Lane, 40th Avenue SW (South of 5th Street SW) and Deuce Court located in West Side Subdivision; heretofore designated as Public Works Project No. 9521 is hereby approved subject to the terms outlined above and all applicable requirements of Chapter 206, et seq. Indian River County Code. 42 OCTOBER 15, 1996 r � r No. 96- LU The foregoing resolution was offered by Commissioner Eggert An mored its adq3tirn. Mie nnt= was se=xbd by Commissioner Tippin and, upon being put to a vote, the vote was as follows: Chairman Fran B. Adams Aye Vice -Chairman Carolyn K. Eggert Aye Commissioner John W. Tippin Aye Commissioner Richard N. Bird Aye Commissioner Kenneth R. Macht Aye The Chairman thereupon declared the resolution passed and adopted this 15 day of October , 1996. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA Bye t -- - - -- F B . ADAMS , Chairman Attest . JEFFREY. BARTqN, Cler i 43 OCTOBER 15, 1996 BOOK 99 Pnu 441 J Time and Place (Second Reso.) BOOK 2/7/96(ENG)RES2.MAG\gfk RESOLUTION NO. 96- 129 A RESOLUTION OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, SETTING A TIME AND PLACE AT WHICH THE OWNERS OF PROPERTY ON 6TH LANE, 40TH AVENUE SW (SOUTH OF 5TH STREET SW) AND DEUCE COURT IN WEST SIDE SUBDIVISION AND OTHER INTERESTED PERSONS MAY APPEAR BEFORE THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS AND BE HEARD AS TO THE PROPRIETY AND ADVISABILITY OF MAKING PAVING AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS TO SAID PROPERTY AS TO THE COST THEREOF, AS TO THE MANNER OF PAYMENT THEREFOR, AND AS TO THE AMOUNT THEREOF TO BE SPECIALLY ASSESSED AGAINST EACH PROPERTY BENEFITED THEREBY. 7 99 m"E' 442 WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County has, by Resolution No. 9 6 -12 8 , determined that it is necessary for the public welfare of the citizens of the county, and particularly as to those living, working, and owning property within the area described herein, that paving and drainage improvements be made to said property; and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners has caused an assessment roll to be completed and filed with the Clerk to the Board; and WHEREAS, Section 206.06, Indian River County Code, requires that the Board of County Commissioners shall fix a time and place at which the owners of the properties to be assessed or any other persons interested therein may appear before the Board of County Commissioners and be heard as to the propriety and advisability of making paving and drainage improvements to said property, as to the cost thereof, as to the manner of payment therefor, and as to the amount thereof to be assessed against each property benefited thereby, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, as follows: 1. The County Commission shall meet at the County Commission chambers in the County Administration Building at the hour of 9:05 A.M. on Tuesday. November 5, 1996, at which time the owners of the properties to be assessed 44 OCTOBER 15, 1996 RESOLUTION NO. 96- 12 9 and any other interested persons may appear before said Commission and be heard in regard to said property. The area to be improved and the properties to be specially benefited are more particularly described upon the assessment plat and the assessment roll with regard to the special assessments. 2. All persons interested in the construction of said improvements and the special assessments against the properties to be specially benefited may review the assessment plat showing the area to be assessed, the assessment roll, the plans and specifications for said improvements, and an estimate of the cost thereof at the office of the Clerk to the Board any week day from 8:30 A.M. until 5:00 P.M. 3. Notice of the time and place of this public hearing shall be given by the Department of Public Works by two publications in the Vero Beach Press Journal Newspaper a week apart. The last publication shall be at least one week prior to the date of the hearing. The Indian River County Department of Public Works shall give the owner of each property to be specially assessed at least ten days notice in writing of such time and place, which shall be served by mailing a copy of such notice to each of such property owners at his last known address. The resolution was moved for adoption by Commissioner Eggert , and the motion was seconded by Commissioner T i p p i n , and, upon being put to a vote, the vote was as follows: Chairman Fran B. Adams Aye Vice Chairman Carolyn K. Eggert Aye Commissioner John W. Tippin Aye Commissioner Richard N. Bird Aye Commissioner Kenneth R. Macht Aye 45 OCTOBER 15, 1996 BOOK 99 FACT 44;j BOOK 99 PAGE 444 RESOLUTION NO. 96- 12 9 The Chairman thereupon declared the resolution duly passed and adopted this 15 day of October , 1996. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA By FRAN B. ADAMS, Chairman Attest: ; Je ey K. Barton, Cler Attachment: ASSESSMENT ROLL wsideset.res Indian River County Approved Date Administration a 101-9M Budget /Q/y�s; Legal A^ �f Risk Management /C OS Public Works /p Engineering �l 46 OCTOBER 15, 1996 Ab v tamp 0 PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR PAVING AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS TO: WEST SIDE SUBDIVISION (RACQUET CLUB) TOTAL PARCELS ............. 17 COST TO PROPERTY OWNERS... $76,389.16 PROJECT NO. 9521 COST PER PARCEL......... $4,493.48 NO. OF P.O./COUNTY TOTAL NAME & ADDRESS LEGAL DESCRIPTION PARCELS COST/PARCEL TOTAL COST AGREEMENT ASSESSMENT COST 1. Arlene Green Bradshaw 22 33 39 00006 0000 00001.0 1.00 $4,493.48 $4,493.48 5965.00 $3,528.48 4 P.O. Box 4080 West Side Subdivision PBI 9-3 Vero Beach, FL 32964-4080 Lot I (OR BK 495, PP 494) 2. James L. & HenrI Sue Bynum 22 33 39 00006 0000 00002.0 1.00 $4,493.48 $4,493.48 $965.00 $3,528.48 " 4261 Deuce Court West Side Subdivision PBI 9-3 Vero Beach, FL 32968 Lot 2 3. Harold V. & Margaret G. Mason 22 33 39 00006 0000 00003.0 1.00 $4,493.48 $4,493.48 $965.00 $3,528.48 + P.O. Box 154 West Side Subdivision PBI 9-3 Vero Beach, FL 32961-0154 Lot 3 4. Richard L. Prendergast 22 33 39 00006 0000 00004.0 1.00 $4,493.48 $4,493.48 $965.00 $3,528.48 35 43rd Avenue West Side Subdivision PBI 9-3 Vero Beach, FL 32968 Lot 4 S. Gregory H. & Nancy L. Galley 22 33 39 00006 0000 00005.0 1.00 $4,493.48 $4,493.48 $965.00 $3,528.48 + 4280 Game Street West Side Subdivision PBI 9-3 Vero Beach, FL 32968 South 1/2 of Lot 5 6. Edward P. & Teri L. BarenBorg 22 33 39 00006 0000 00005.1 1.00 $4,493.48 $4,493.48 $965.00 $3,528.48 • 555 SW 40th Avenue West Side Subdivision PBI 9-3 Vero Beach, FL 32968 North 1/2 of Lot 5 [1 PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR PAVING AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS TO: WEST SIDE SUBDIVISION (RACQUET CLUB) PROJECT NO. 9521 NAME & ADDRESS LEGAL DESCRIPTION NO. OF PARCELS COST/PARCEL TOTAL COST TOTAL PARCELS ............. 17 COST TO PROPERTY OWNERS... $76,389.16 COST PER PARCEL......... $4,493.48 P.O./COUNTY TOTAL AGREEMENT ASSESSMENT COST 7. Leona G. Taft 22 33 39 00006 0000 00006.0 1.00 $4,493.48 $4,493.48 $965.00 $3,528.48 • 655 40th Avenue SW West Side Subdivision Pill 9-3 Vero Beach, FL 32968 Lot 6 8. Robert Alan & Pamela Schlamowitz 22 33 39 00006 0000 00007.0 1.00 $4,493.48 $4,493.48 $965.00 $3,528.48 + 4160 6th Lane SW West Side Subdivision PBI 9-3 Vero Beach, FL 32968 Lot 7 9. John T. & Isabelle B. Dayton 22 33 39 00006 0000 00008.0 1.00 $4,493.48 $4,493.48 $965.00 $3,528.48 • 4220 6th Lane SW West Side Subdivision PBI 9-3 Vero Beach, FL 32968 Lot 8 10. James B.P.Gibson & 22 33 39 00006 0000 00009.0 1.00 $4,493.48 $4,493.48 $965.00 $3,528.48 • Susan Baxter West Side Subdivision PBI 9-3 4230 6th Lane SW Lot 9 Vero Beach, FL 32968 11. Nadya Schultz 22 33 39 00006 0000 00010.0 1.00 $4,493.48 $4,493.48 $965.00 $3,528.48 0 4280 Game Street West Side Subdivision PBI 9-3 Vero Beach, FL 32968 Lot 10 12. Billy Joe & Virginia Mary Davis 22 33 39 00006 0000 00011.0 1.00 $4,493.48 $4,493.48 $965.00 $3,528.48 • 4281 Game Street West Side Subdivision PBI 9-3 Vero Beach, FL 32968 Lot 11 �h O O Zoe cc co -v 1 r -n rn Cn n PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR PAVING AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS TO: WEST SIDE SUBDIVISION (RACQUET CLUB) PROJECT NO. 9521 LEGAL DESCRIPTION 22 33 39 00006 0000 00012.0 West Side Subdivision PBI 9-3 Lot 12 22 33 39 00006 0000 00013.0 West Side Subdivision PBI 9-3 Lot 13 22 33 39 00006 0000 00014.0 West Side Subdivision PBI 9-3 Lot 14 22 33 39 00006 0000 00015.0 West Side Subdivision PBI 9-3 Lot 15 Indian River Farms Company Subdivision PBS 2-25 West 795 FT of South 432 FT of North 737 FT of West 30.38 Acres of Tract 12, Less West 100 FT (OR BK 477 PP 95) TOTAL PARCELS ............. 17 COST TO PROPERTY OWNERS... $76,389.16 COST PER PARCEL......... $4,493.48 NO. OF P.O./COUNTY TOTAL PARCELS COSTIPARCEL TOTAL COST AGREEMENT ASSESSMENT COST 1.00 $4,493.48 $4,493.48 $965.00 $3,528.48 • 1.00 $4,493.48 $4,493.48 $965.00 $3,528.48 • 1.00 $4,493.48 NAME & ADDRESS 13. Alfred C. Westerman 1.00 $4,493.48 P.O. Box 3015 $965.00 Vero Beach, FL 32964-3015 14. Ernest L.& Margie L. Caplinger $965.00 4221 6th Lane SW Vero Beach, FL 32968 15. Samuel T. & Elaine Schlamowitz 4211 6th Lane SW Vero Beach, FL 32968 16. Earl T.& Therese H. Spytek P.O. Box 2558 Vero Beach, FL 32961-2558 17. Roberto C. Leon 21 Blackwood Lane Stamford, CT 06908 LEGAL DESCRIPTION 22 33 39 00006 0000 00012.0 West Side Subdivision PBI 9-3 Lot 12 22 33 39 00006 0000 00013.0 West Side Subdivision PBI 9-3 Lot 13 22 33 39 00006 0000 00014.0 West Side Subdivision PBI 9-3 Lot 14 22 33 39 00006 0000 00015.0 West Side Subdivision PBI 9-3 Lot 15 Indian River Farms Company Subdivision PBS 2-25 West 795 FT of South 432 FT of North 737 FT of West 30.38 Acres of Tract 12, Less West 100 FT (OR BK 477 PP 95) TOTAL PARCELS ............. 17 COST TO PROPERTY OWNERS... $76,389.16 COST PER PARCEL......... $4,493.48 NO. OF P.O./COUNTY TOTAL PARCELS COSTIPARCEL TOTAL COST AGREEMENT ASSESSMENT COST 1.00 $4,493.48 $4,493.48 $965.00 $3,528.48 • 1.00 $4,493.48 $4,493.48 $965.00 $3,528.48 • 1.00 $4,493.48 $4,493.48 $965.00 $3,528.48 • 1.00 $4,493.48 $4,493.48 $965.00 $3,528.48 0 1.00 $4,493.48 $4,493.48 $965.00 $3,528.48 • 17 $4,493.48 $76,389.16 $16,405.00 $59,984.16 710TAL PARCffiS QRST PAP PARCH 70TAL COST AORi ENZWT Pima 7t7TAL ASSERVAE VT 1 1 1 BOOK 99 PAGE 448 AS -BUILT RESOLUTION & ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR PAVING & DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS TO 79TH STREET BETWEEN 101ST AVENUE AND 91ST AVENUE IN VERO LAKE ESTATES The Board reviewed the following memo dated 10/4/96: TO: James Chandler County Administrator ^ THROUGH: James W. Davis, P.E Public Works Direct r and ; Roger D. Cain, P.E County Engineer i FROM: Michelle A. Gentile, CET Civil Engineer SUBJECT: As -Built Resolutions & Assessment Rolls for Paving and Drainage Improvements to: 1) 79th Street between 101st Avenue and 91st Avenue in Vero Lake Estates Subdivision DATE: October 4, 1996 DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS The paving of the above road has been completed. assessment is as follows: 1) 79th Street - IRC Project No. 9313 Preliminary Estimates Fundinq Sources MSTU•_ $307,571.75 - 93.74±% Special Assessment $ 20.554.26 - 6.26±% TOTAL $328,126.01 Final Costs MSTU $307,260.44 - 93.73±% Special Assessment S 20.554.26 - 6.27±% TOTAL $327,814.70 The final The final assessment roll has been prepared and is ready to be delivered to the Clerk to the Board. Assessments are to be paid within 90 days or in 2 equal installments, the first to be made twelve months from the due date and subsequent payments to be due yearly from the due date at an interest rate of 8;% established by the Board of County Commissioners. 50 OCTOBER 15, 1996 ALTERNATIVES AND ANALYSIS Since the final costs are less than the preliminary costs, the final cost allocation would be to assess the benefited owners $2.00 per front foot, deduct the difference from the MSTU account. Funding Sources MSTU $307,260.44 Special Assessment $ 20,554.26 TOTAL $327,814.70 RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the final assessment roll and the IlAs-Built Resolution" for the paving of the above mentioned road be approved by the Board of County Commissioners and that it be transferred to the Tax Collector for recording in the "Assessment Lien Book" and for collection. ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by Commissioner Bird, the Board unanimously adopted Resolution 96-130, certifying "as -built" costs for certain paving and drainage improvements to 79th As -Built (Fourth Reso.) 2/19/96(ENG)-RES4.MAG\gfk RESOLUTION NO. 96-130 A RESOLUTION OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY CERTIFYING "AS -BUILT" COSTS FOR CERTAIN PAVING AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS TO 79TH STREET BETWEEN 101ST AVENUE & 91ST AVENUE IN VERO LAKE ESTATES SUBDIVISION, DESIGNATED AS PROJECT NO. 9313, AND OTHER CONSTRUCTION NECESSITATED BY SUCH PROJECT; PROVIDING FOR FORMAL COMPLETION DATE, AND DATE FOR PAYMENT WITHOUT PENALTY AND INTEREST. WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County determined that the improvements described herein. specially benefited the property located within the boundaries as described in this title, designated as Project No. 9313, are in the public interest and promote the public welfare of the county; and WHEREAS, on January 10, 1995, the Board held a public hearing in the Commission Chambers at which time the owners of the property to be assessed were afforded an opportunity to appear before the Board to be heard as to the propriety and advisability of making such improvements; and 51 BOOK 99 FADE 449 OCTOBER 15, 1996 r BOOK 99 FAu 450 RESOLUTION NO. 96-130 WHEREAS, after such public hearing was held the County Commission adopted Resolution No. 95-08, which confirmed the special assessment cost of the project to the property specially benefited by the project in the amounts listed in an attachment to that resolution; and WHEREAS, the Director of Public Works has certified the actual "as -built" cost now that the project has been completed is $2.00 per front foot, which is the same $2.00 per front foot in the confirming Resolution No. 95-08, NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY# FLORIDA, that: 1. Resolution No. 95-08 is modified as follows: The completion date for Project No. 9313 is declared to be September 6, 1996, and the last day that payment may be made avoiding interest and penalty charges is ninety (90) days after passage of this resolution. 2. Payments bearing interest at the rate of 8h% per annum may be made in two equal installments, the first to be made twelve (12) months from the due date and the subsequent payments to be due yearly from the due date. The due date is ninety (90) days after the passage of this resolution. 3. The assessment roll for said project listed in Resolution No. 95-08 shall be as set forth in attached Exhibit "A" to this resolution. 4. The assessments as shown in attached Exhibit"A" shall stand confirmed and remain legal, valid, and binding first liens against the property against which such assessments are made until paid. 5. The assessments shown in Exhibit "A", attached to Resolution No. 95-08 were recorded by the County on the public records of Indian River County, and the lien shall constitute prima facie evidence of its validity. OCTOBER 15, 1996 52 No. 96- 130 This resolution was moved for adoption by Commissioner Eggert and the motion was seconded by Commissioner Bird and, upon being put to a vote, the vote was as follows: Chairman Fran B. Adams Aye Vice -Chairman Carolyn K. Eggert Aye Commissioner Kenneth R. Macht Aye Commissioner John W. Tippin Aye Commissioner Richard N. Bird Aye The Chairman thereupon declared the resolution duly passed and adopted this 15 day of__ October , 1996. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OFFINDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA Bj� O,,vC �8 (J)do 1;4tZ FRAN B. ADAMS, Chairman Attest: JEFFREY K. BARTON, / Clerk Attachment: Exhibit "A" 79asblt.res 2 Indma Rhw Cooly Appso ed Date Administration r C f d Budget ,d/y Risk Management Alai, la pr. PubHe Works j p Engineering �� Q EXHIBIT A - ASSESSMENT ROLL - IS ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD 53 OCTOBER 15, 1996 600K 99 N� GE 451 Fr- -7 600K 99 M U ADDITIONAL ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR GIFFORD PARK The Board reviewed the following memo dated 10/4/96: TO: James E. Chandler, County Administrator FROM: James W. Davis, P.E., Public Works Director op SUBJECT: Additional Engineering Services for Gifford Park REF. LETTER: Paul Dritenbas to Jim Davis dated Sept. 26, 1996 DATE: October 4, 1996 DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS During the design of the new Gifford Park ballfield/concession stand, it was discovered that the existing 2" water line serving the existing south field was not adequate to service the proposed field. A new waterline connecting to 49th Street was more desirable. In addition, a letter of exemption from St. Johns River Water Management District was required. As a result, additional engineering fees and reimbursable expenditures in the amount of $833.77 were necessary. RECOMMENDATIONS AND FUNDING Staff recommends that the Board approve additional engineering services and incidental reimbursables to Edlund and Dritenbas, PA (Carter and Associates, Inc, subconsultant) in the amount of $833.77. Funding to be from the 1,0 Sales Tax program as previously budgeted. OCTOBER 15, 1996 Indian River Countv A roved . Date Administration !C A Q Bud et / Legal Risk Management / Pub& works Engineeing 54 I Chairman Adams inquired about the $833.77 total, and Administrator Chandler explained that $833.77 was the negotiated amount. The original proposal was $1,572.50. ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by Commissioner Bird, the Board unanimously approved additional engineering services from Edlund and Dritenbas in the amount of $833.77, as set out in staff's recommendation. IRC FAIRGROUNDS - VERO BEACH POW WOW The Board reviewed the following memo dated 10/7/96: TO: James E. Chandler, County Administrator FROM: James W. Davis, P.E. Public Works Director SUBJECT: Request to Use Indian River County Fairgrounds for Vero Beach Pow Wow DATE: October 7, 1996 DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS The Treasure Coast Indian Association and Indian River County/Vero Beach Recreation Department are requesting use of the Fairgrounds for a three day Pow Wow to be conducted Feb. 28 - March 2, 1997. The purpose of the festival is to share the Native American culture with the people of the Treasure Coast. A minimal gate fee will be charged, however, a School Day will be conducted on Friday, the 28th. It is anticipated that this will be an annual event. The Recreation Department is co -sponsoring the event and the Fairgrounds user fee of $100 per day will be waived. Insurance will be provided. The Parks and Recreation Committee has approved the request. RECOMMENDATIONS AND FUNDING It is recommended that the request be approved. Any County funding will be offset by revenues anticipated to be received (see attached list of revenue and expenses). OCTOBER 15, 1996 55 BOOK 99 I 600K '99 PA E 454 Treasure CoaA Indian noiooiation Powwow Proposal: Estimated Income: This is a very conservative estimate of income 50 traders @$150 =$ 7500 4 food booths @ $150 =$450 Admission $2000 Program Ads $600 Donations $500 Total Income $11,200 Estimated Expenses: This may be less, most things are estimated high Head Lady and Head -Man - $300 Drum - $1500 Arena Director - $150 M.C.$150 Lodging for staff- $750 Mail $250 Phone $400 Tickets $100 Food for staff $300 Awards for Lodges $400 Give away $300 2 Pendleton $250 Dancer's Awards $400 Bead Work $100 Birds of Prey $300 Shawl and Crown for Princess $300 (Princess Competition is optional and Crown is a one time expense) Arena Setup $1000 Sound System $400 Flag Pole & Flags - $100 Sign & Direction - $100 Advertising- $200 School Day & Children's Games - $200 First Aid - $500 Lighting - $300 Tent for Committee and 4 tables $400 Total Expenses $9150 OCTOBER 15, 1996 M 56 M E71 ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by Commissioner Bird, the Board unanimously approved the use of the IRC Fairgrounds for the Vero Beach Pow Wow; any County funding to be offset by revenues anticipated to be received. Marjorie Armstrong of the staff & trader POW WOW committee, invited everyone to attend the POW WOW to be held February 28 -March 2, 1997. LAURELWOOD FORCE MAIN & LIFT STATION UPGRADE - CHANGE ORDER #3 - TREASURE COAST CONTRACTING, INC. The Board reviewed the following memo dated 10/3/96: DATE: OCTOBER 3, 1996 TO: JAMES E. CHANDLER COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR FROM: TERRANCE G. PIN DIRECTOR OF U LI Y SERVICES PREPARED ROBERT O. WISEMEN, P.E AND STAFFED ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEER BY: DEPARTMENT OF UTILITY SERVICES SUBJECT: LAURELWOOD FORCE MAIN AND LIFT STATION UPGRADE CHANGE ORDER NO. 3 AND RETAINAGE REDUCTION INDIAN RIVER COUNTY PROJECT NO. US -96 -03 -CS BACKGROUND On September 3, 1996, the Board of County Commissioners approved Change Order No. 2 for Phase II of the project and adjusted the contract amount to $197,704.92. Construction of Phases I and II are complete and found satisfactory. The contractor has not delivered a complete as -built plan for the project; however, he requested a partial release and a reduction in retainage to 2%. ANALYSIS Both phases of construction are complete. An adjustment was made based on construction quantity. (See attached spreadsheet for proposed Change Order No. 3.) With the additional surveyed as - built on Phase 1 and a fan guard to prevent children playing and crossing the ditch on the pipe, the total for Change Order No. 3 is in the amount of $605.50. This adjusts the contract amount to $198,310.42. The 2% retainage amounts to $3,966.21. Total payments made to the contractor to date have been $176,570.48. Therefore, the amount due the contractor with the 2% retainage is OCTOBER 15, 1996 57 A. aooK 99 Pari 455 BOOK 99 PAGE 456 $17,773.73. The last phase of this construction cannot be performed until FDOT has finished its construction on the bridge crossing the South Relief Canal on 27th Avenue. RECOMMENDATION The staff of the Department of Utility Services recommends that the Board of County Commissioners approve Change Order No. 3 in the amount of $605.50 and the reduction in retainage to 20 until the contractor has delivered the as -built drawing to the County. ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by Commissioner Bird, the Board unanimously approved Change Order #3 with Treasure Coast Contracting, Inc. in the amount of $605.50, as set out in staff's recommendation. CHANGE ORDER #3 IS ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD 26TH STREET REUSE WATER LINE RELOCATION - WORK AUTHORIZATION NO. 40 - DRIVEWAYS, INC. The Board reviewed the following memo dated 10/3/96: DATE: OCTOBER 3, 1996 TO: JAMES E. CHANDLER COUNTY ADMINISTRATO FROM: TERRANCE G. PINT DIRECTOR OF UTI SERVICES PREPARED ROBERT O. WISEMEN, P.E. AND STAFFED ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEER 12" BY: DEPARTMENT OF UTILITY SERVICES SUBJECT: 26TH STREET REUSE WATER LINE RELOCATION LABOR CONTRACT - WORK AUTHORIZATION NO. 40 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY PROJECT NO. IIS -96 -21 -ED BACKGROUND The Indian River County Public Works Department, during an exploratory stage of the proposed paving project on 26th Street, found a conflict between their proposed cross drainpipe and the reuse water line. Due to this conflict, the Public Works Department has requested the Utilities Department to adjust the elevation of the reuse line in several locations within thirty days where conflict has occurred to avoid delays with their construction schedule. 58 OCTOBER 15, 1996 r ANALYSIS Staff has evaluated the situation and has obtained estimates as to the cost for the project. The material will be purchased directly from US Filter/Davis, Inc., in the amount of $13,985.66. US Filter/Davis, Inc., has an annual supply contract with the County this fiscal year. Staff proposes using the labor contract for construction with Driveways, Inc., which was renewed on August 20, 1996. The total amount in labor for this work is $6,147.68. It shall be paid through Account No. 471-000-169-311.00. RECOMMENDATION The staff of --the Utilities Department recommends that the Board of County Commissioners approve and authorize the staff to issue a purchase order for the direct purchase of material from US Filter/Davis, Inc., in the amount of $13,985.66 and approve the labor contract with Driveways, Inc., Work Authorization No. 40, in the amount of $6,147.68. ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by Commissioner Tippin, the Board unanimously approved Work Authorization No. 40 with Driveways, Inc. in the amount of $6,147.68. WORK AUTH. #40 IS ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD CONTINUING SERVICES SURVEY WORK IN EXCESS OF $10.000 The Board reviewed the following memo dated 10/2/96: DATE: TO: FROM: PREPARED AND STAFFED BY: SUBJECT: BACKGROUND OCTOBER 2, 1996 JAMES E. CHANDLER COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR TERRANCE G. PI DIRECTOR OF Ids WILLIAM F. CAPITAL PR DEPARTMENT CES P. E. TY SERVICES CONTINUING SERVICES SURVEY WORK IN EXCESS OF $10,000.00 On August 7, 1996, the County received six (6) responses to a Request for Qualifications and Proposals (RFP) on the above - referenced project. September 11, 1996, presentations were made to the staff selection committee. The selection process- is completed, and the Department is now prepared to proceed with contract negotiations. 59 OCTOBER 15, 1996 99 .FAQ E457 I BOOK 99 ANALYSIS The following firms submitted proposals for this RFP: 1) Carter Associates, Inc. 2) Morgan and Eckland 3) Masteller and Moler, Inc. 4) Lawson and Noble 5) Kimley Horn 6) David M. Jones All of the above -listed firms, with the exception of Morgan and Eckland, made presentations to the selection committee. (Morgan and Eckland rescinded at the.last minute). The top three firms were selected in order as follows: •.1) Masteller and Moler, Inc. 2) Carter Associates, Inc. 3) Kimley Horn All three firms will be put under contract on a rotational basis for surveying projects in excess of $10,000.00. RECOMMNDATION The staff of the Department of Utility Services recommends that the Board of County Commissioners authorize staff to proceed with the negotiation of continuing service contracts with the three successful firms listed above. ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by Commissioner Bird, the Board unanimously authorized staff to proceed with the negotiation of continuing service contracts with the three successful firms listed in staff's recommendation. NORTH COUNTY WELL FIELD PROTECT FINALIZATION - MISSIMER INTERNATIONAL AND AMERICAN DRILLING The Board reviewed the following memo dated 10/3/96: :-( OCTOBER 15, 1996 DATE: TO: FROM: PREPARED AND STAFFED BY: SUBJECT: BACKGROUND OCTOBER 3, 1996 JAMES E. CHANDLER COUNTY ADMINISTRA' TERRANCE G. DIRECTOR OF WILLIAM F. CAPITAL PR DEPARTMEN O Y ERVICES -,IN, P. E. 'TS ENGINEER UTILITY SERVICES NORTH COUNTY WELLFIELD PROJECT FINALIZATION INDIAN RIVER COUNTY PROJECT NO. UW -94 -12 -DS In January 1995, the Indian River County Commission approved a contract with Missimer International for hydrogeologic services associated with the above -referenced project. In July 1995, the Board also approved a contract with American' Drilling for construction of the wells associated with this project. We are now prepared to make final contract adjustments, allowing final payment to be made, as well as allowing application to St. Johns River Water Management District for our available grant monies. ANALYSIS The original contract amount with Missimer International was in the amount of. $122,496.00. As a result of additional permitting responses to St. Johns and an additional required contract inspection, they are requesting an additional $9,780.00 in fees. (See attached letter of explanation and proposed Work Authorization No. 2 from Missimer.) The Utilities Department staff concur with Missimer's request and are recommending approval. If approved, this would raise their fees to $132,276.00. The original contract amount with American Drilling was $249,050.00. Change Order No. 1 reduced the contract amount to $241,085.00, and the proposed final change order will reduce the contract by -an additional amount of $9,992.00. (See the attached final change order for details.) Approval of this change order will equate to a final contract cost of $231,093.00 with American Drilling. The final cost breakdown for this project is as follows: Original Final Missimer International $122,496.00 $132,276.00 American Drilling 249.050.00 231.093.00 Total $371,546.00 $363,369.00 As a result of all final changes, the total project cost.has been reduced by $8,177.00, or a 2.2%± decrease in project costs. RECOMMENDATION The staff of the Department of Utility Services recommends approval of the following as presented: 1. Work Authorization No. 2 amount of $9,780.00. 2. Final change order with decrease of $9,992.00. with Missimer International in the American Drilling for a contract 3. Final pay request from American Drilling as attached. 61 a®oK 99 e�,c�� 459 OCTOBER 15, 1996 BOOK ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by Commissioner Bird, the Board unanimously approved staff's recommendation as set out in the above memo. WORK AUTH. #2 AND FINAL CHANGE ORDERS ARE ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD WASTE STREAM COLLECTION SYSTEM CONSTRUCTION FOR SOUTH COUNTY ODOR CONTROL The Board reviewed the following memo dated 10/8/96: DATE: OCTOBER 8, 1996 TO: JAMES E. CHANDLER COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR FROM: TERRANCE G. P DIRECTOR O' S VICES PREPARED WILLIAM F Mc N, P.E. AND STAFFED CAPITAL CTS ENGINEER BY: DEP OF UTILITY SERVICES SUBJECT: WA`5'FE STREAM COLLECTION SYSTEM CONSTRUCTION FOR SOUTH COUNTY ODOR CONTROL INDIAN RIVER COUNTY PROJECT NO. UW -95 -03 -WC BACKGROUND In preparation for the installation of an odor control system at the South County Reverse Osmosis Plant, we must now proceed with approval for the construction of associated support facilities at the site. This work will include the installation of a waste side stream conveyance system, electrical service modifications and water service installation. ANALYSIS All construction will be performed by County staff with materials purchased as required from contracted County vendors. Below, please find the estimated costs associated with this project: 62 OCTOBER 15, 1996 Cost *1. Construction of lift station **2. Modification to electric (i.e., new service) **3. Water service installation 4. Staff (construction) and permitting and engineering Subtotal ***15o Contingency Total Cost $12,864.50 $ 1,400.00 $ 1,000.00 3,000.00 $18,264.50 S 2.740.00 $21,004.50 * Purchase of a prefabricated lift station and the pump controls will be through ABS pumps, as sole supplier to the County for this type of system, through the issuance of a purchase order. ** Purchase of materials will be through continuing services contracted vendors with the installation by County staff. ***To be utilized if required with authorization from the Utilities Director. RECOMMENDATION The staff of the Department of Utility Services recommends approval of the project as outlined above through the issuance of purchase orders as described and construction by County staff personnel. MOTION WAS MADE by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by Commissioner Bird, to approve the project as outlined above through the issuance of purchase orders as described and construction by County staff personnel, as set out in staff's recommendation. Under discussion, Chairman Adams asked how we decided to use this odor control system, and Bill McCain, capital projects engineer, advised that we are not installing an odor control system as part of this. This is the base framework to accommodate whatever odor control system we go with in the future. Staff will be coming back with something on that in the near future. This accommodates the electric, the waste stream, etc. that will be required for whatever ultimate odor control is put in. Chairman Adams assumed that whichever we decide to put in, all this other stuff will be independent. Mr. McCain confirmed that this would be utilized with whatever type of system that is put in. We are preparing ourselves for the future. This will be done by in-house staff. THE CHAIRMAN CALLED FOR THE QUESTION. The Motion carried unanimously. OCTOBER 15, 1996 63 BOOK 9,qp1 rf " BOOK 99 PmE 462 TREASURE COAST COUNCIL OF LOCAL GOVERNMENTS Commissioner Tippin advised that the Treasure Coast Council of Local Governments will hold their annual meeting on November 7 in Port St. Lucie and asked that as many Commissioners as possible attend, as well as the County Attorney and the County Administrator. SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL DISTRICT Chairman Adams announced that immediately following adjournment, the Board would convene as the Board of District Commissioners of the Solid Waste Disposal District. Those Minutes are being prepared separately. There being no further business, on Motion duly made, seconded and carried, the Board adjourned at 11:43 a.m. ATTEST: J. Barton, Clerk Minutes approved `% Q-9 L 64 OCTOBER 15, 1996 Fran B. Adams, Chairman