HomeMy WebLinkAbout11/5/1996 (2)� MINUTEnTTACHED �
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
A G E N D A -
NOVEMBER 5,1996
9:00 A.M. - COUNTY COMMISSION CHAMBER
County Administration Building
1840 25th Street
Vero Beach, Florida
COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
Fran B. Adams, Chairman (District 1)
Carolyn K. Eggert, Vice Chairman (District 2)
Richard N. Bird (District 5)
Kenneth R. Macht (District 3)
John W. Tippin (District 4)
James E. Chandler, County Administrator
Charles P. Vitunac,-County Attorney
Jeffrey K. Barton, Clerk to the Board
9:00 a.m. 1. CALL TO ORDER BACKUP
PAGES
2. INVOCATION None
3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE - Comm. John W. Tippin
4. ADDITIONS to the AGENDA/EMERGENCY ITEMS
13.C. Discussion on Ethics Ordinance concerning
Indian River Mall Grand Opening invitations
and others
5. PROCLAMATION and PRESENTATIONS
A. Presentation of Proclamation Designating November,
1996 as National Adoption Month in Ind. Riv. Co.
B. Presentation of Proclamation Designating Saturday,
Nov. 16, 1996 as "The County Sweep Day" in I.R.C.
6. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
A. Regular Meeting of October 1, 1996
B. Regular Meeting of October 8, 1996
7. CONSENT AGENDA
A. Received & Placed on rile in Office of Clerk
to the Board:
(1) I.R. Farms Water Control District,
Minutes for FY from 10/01/95 thru 9/30/96
(2) Supv. of Elections letter enclosing income
from lists, labels, etc., interest & balance in unex-
pended funds from Elections budget at end of FY
95/96
(3) Clerk of Circuit Court, Constitutional
Officers Financial Report for FY ending 9/30/96
2
7. CONSENT AGENDA (cont'd.):
PAGES
B.
Approval of Warrants
(memorandum dated Oct. 17, 1996)
3-11
C.
Approval of Warrants
(memorandum dated October 24, 1996)
12-21 _
D.
Approval to Transfer George Hamner to
P & Z At -Large Position Recently Vacated
by Dan Richey
(memorandum dated October 18, 1996).
2z-
2E.
E.
Approval for Commissioners to Attend 1997
Legislative Conference of FAC in Tallahassee
on Nov. 20-22,1996
(memorandum dated October 18, 1996)
23-25
F.
Approval of County Commission Bonds for
Fran B. Adams and Kenneth R. Macht =
26-31
G.
Acceptance of Resignation of Eleanor Renuart
from Economic Opportunities Council
(letter dated Oct. 18, 1996)
32
H.
Request for Approval of the Third Progress Report
and Reimbursement Invoice for the 1996 Planning
Grant
(memorandum dated October 24, 1996)
33-40
I.
CCA Holdings Inc.'s Request for Final Plat Approval
for a Multi -Family Residential Planned Development
to be Known as Kyle's Run
(memorandum dated October 28, 1996)
41-45
J.
GHA Harbor Ltd.'s_
Request for Planned Development
Final Plat Approval for Harbor Links Phase II, Grand
Harbor Plat 19
(memorandum dated October 28, 1996)
46-50
K.
I.R.C. Purchasing Manual Addendum - Purchasing Bid
and Award Procedures
(memorandum dated October 22, 1996)
51-55
L.
Declare Equipment Surplus for Sale
(memorandum dated October 28, 1996)
56-57
M.
Award Bid #7006 / Hickory Sands Water Service
(memorandum dated October 22, 1996)
58-70
N.
County Owned Land Swap
(memorandum dated October 10, 1996)
71-73
O.
Award Bid #7007 / Golf Ball Retrieval Services
(memorandum dated October 28, 1996) -
74-77
P.
800 MHz Radio System/Fiber Optic Cable Con-
nectivity Agreement w/ City of Vero Beach
(memorandum dated October 28, 1996)
78-81
7. CONSENT AGENDA (cont'd )• BACKUP
PAGES
Q. Request for Floodplain Cut and Fill Balance Waiver
for I.R. Medical Center _
(memorandum dated October 25, 1996) 82-84
R. Agreement with Hammock Lakes Assoc. for Paving
of 1st St. SW Between 58th Ave. & 43rd Ave.
(memorandum dated October 25, 1996) 85-89
S. License for Use of Road & Bridge Complex to Store
PEP Reef Forms
(memorandum dated October 16, 1996) 90-94
T. Security Surveillance System - Customer Service Area
(memorandum dated October 24, 1996) 95-98
U. Temporary Wastewater Service Agreement - I.R.C.
and Richard E. McNamara
(memorandum dated October 16, 1996) 99-105
V. A Resolution to Accept Dedication of R -O -W and to
Cancel Taxes on Same
(memorandum dated October 17, 1996) 106-110
W. Indian River Club - Agreement for Re -Use Water
Delivery
(memorandum dated October 30, 1996) 111-118
X. 58th Ave. R/W Purchase - Laurel Bldrs. (Parcel #101-D)
(memorandum dated October 28, 1996) 119-120
Y. Miscellaneous Budget Amendment #003
(memorandum dated October 30, 1996) 121-122
8. CONSTITUTIONAL OFFICERS and
GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES
None
9:05 A.M. 9. PUBLIC ITEMS
A. PUBLIC HEARINGS
1. Consideration of Land Exchange for the
Relocation of Lundberg Rd. & Additional
58th Ave. R -O -W Acquisition
(memorandum dated October 24, 1996) 123-134
2. AN ORDINANCE OF INDIAN RIVER
COUNTY, FLORIDA, DECLARING A
SIX-MONTH MORATORIUM ON THE
ACCEPTANCE OF APPLICATIONS FOR
WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATIONS
TOWERS AND ON THE ISSUANCE OF
PERMITS AND APPROVALS FOR THE
CONSTRUCTION OF WIRELESS TELE-
COMMUNICATIONS TOWERS; PROVID-
ING FOR EXCEPTIONS, SETTING FORTH
EXPIRATION AND EFFECTIVE DATES 135-139
wK 99 F -AGK 512
r
BOOK 99 513
9. PUBLIC ITEMS (cont'd )• BACKUP
A. PUBLIC BEARINGS (cont'd )• PAGES
3. Public Hearing for the Paving & Drainage
Improvements to 6th Lane, 40th Ave. SW
(So. of 5th St. SW) and Deuce Court Located
in West Side SJD
(memorandum dated October 24, 1996) 140-148
B. PUBLIC DISCUSSION ITEMS
None
10. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S MATTERS
None
11. DEPARTMENTAL MATTERS
A. Community Development
1. Approval of Hearing Dates for Two Board
Hearings to Consider LDR Amendments Not
Related to Communication Towers
(memorandum dated October 30, 1996)
149-151
2. Request for Board Direction on County
Alcoholic Beverage Regulations
(memorandum dated October 30, 1996)
152-183
3. Consideration of I.R.C. SHIP Program
Annual Reports
(memorandum dated October 29, 1996)
184-210
B. Emergency Services
1. Approval of Sexton Grove Services, Inc.,
Tower Space Lease at Hobart Tower
(memorandum dated October 16, 1996)
211-213
2. Approval of Base Grant Agreement from
the Emergency Management, Preparedness
and Assistance Trust Fund Contract Number
97CP-05-10-40-01-031
(memorandum dated October 17, 1996)
214-241
C. General Services
1. Request to Use New Courthouse
(memorandum dated October 23, 1996)
242-244
2. County Surplus Real Property Sale -
Auctioneer Services Contract
(memorandum dated October 25, 1996)
245-293
D. Leisure Services
None
11. DEPARTMENTAL MATTERS (cont'd )•
E. Office of Management and Budget
Defease the $8,240,000 Solid Waste Bonds Series
1988 and the $9,855,000 Refund and Improvement
Bonds, Series 1985
(memorandum dated October 30, 1996)
F. Personnel
None
G. Public Works
1. Request for Proposals (RFP) from Consultant
Finns - Countywide Traffic Signal Retiming
(memorandum dated October 22, 1996)
2. Request to Advertise for Engineering Services
to Replace Oslo Rd. Bridge at Lateral "J" Canal
(memorandum dated October 24, 1996)
H. Utilities
1. 900 MHz Communication System - Retrofit/
Conversion of Existing Pump Station SCADA
System
(memorandum dated October 29, 1996)
2. Suburban Acres (34th Terrace) Water Service
Bid No. 6067
(memorandum dated October 21, 1996)
12. COUNTY ATTORNEY
A. Wastewater Service for Customer on Durrance Pl.
(memorandum dated October 30, 1996)
(postponed from BCC meeting of 10/22/96)
B. Special Public Defender Contract
(memorandum dated October 29, 1996)
C. Telecommunications Policy
(memorandum dated October 30, 1996)
13. COMMISSIONERS ITEMS
A. Chairman Fran B. Adams
B. Vice Chairman Carolyn K. Eggert
BACKUP
PAGES
294
295-297
298-299
300-309
310-313
314-316
317-320
321-323
BOON 9 FKgL 514
Boa 99
13. COMMISSIONERS ITEMS (cont'd GES
1• RA
CKUP
PAGES
C. Commissioner Richard N. Bird
D. Commissioner Kenneth R. Macht
Children's Services Advisory Committee Report
(no backup provided)
E. Commissioner John W Tippin
14. SPECIAL DISTRICTS/BOARDS
A. Emergency Services District
None
B. Solid Waste Disposal District
1.
Approval of Minutes - Meeting of 10/8/96
2.
Waste Tire Grant / Litter Control Grant
(memorandum dated October 17, 1996)
324-329
3.
Litter Control and Prevention Grant
(memorandum dated October 17, 1996)
330-338
4.
Engineering Services Contract
Contracted Infill Construction and Landfill
Operations
(memorandum dated October 22, 1996)
339-352
5.
Land Purchase for Landfill Expansion -
Hercules
(memorandum dated October 30, 1996)
353-371
6.
Lease Assignment - Perfection Trusses'
Property at the Landfill
(memorandum dated October 30, 1996)
372-392
C. Environmental Control Board
None
15. ADJOURNMENT
Anyone who may wish to appeal any decision which may be made at this meeting will need
to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made which includes the testimony and
evidence upon which the appeal will be based.
Anyone who needs a special accommodation for this meeting may contact fhe county's
Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) coordinator at 567-8000 x408 at least 48 hours in advance
of meeting.
1Veeting broadcast live on TCI Cable Channel 13 - rebroadcast 5: 00 p.m. Thursday through
5:00 p. m. Friday
Falcon Cable Channel 35 - rebroadcast Friday evening
z
INDEX TO MINUTES
November 5, 1996
Regular Meeting of Board of County Commissioners
ADDITIONS TO THE AGENDA/EMERGENCY ITEMS . . . . . . . . . . .
1
PROCLAMATION - NATIONAL ADOPTION MONTH . . . . . . . . . . .
2
PROCLAMATION - "THE COUNTY SWEEP DAY" . . . . . . . . . . . .
3
APPROVAL OF MINUTES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
4
CONSENT
AGENDA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
4
A.
Received & Placed on File in the Office of the Clerk
to the Board . .
4
Indian River Farms Water Control District
4
Supervisor of'Elections . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
4
Clerk of the Circuit Court . . . . . . . . . . . .
4
B.
Approval of Warrants . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
4
C.
Approval of Warrants . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
12
D.
Planning & Zoning Commission - Transfer George
Hamner to At -Large Position . . . . . . . . . . .
19
E.
Attendance - 1997 FAC Legislative Conference . . .
20
F.
County Commission Bonds - Fran B. Adams and Kenneth
R. Macht . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
20
G.
Economic Opportunities Council - Resignation of
Eleanor Renuart . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
20
H.
1996 Transportation Disadvantaged Planning Grant -
Progress Report and Reimbursement Invoice #3 . .
21
I.
Kyle's Run - Final Plat Approval for a Multi -Family
Residential Planned Development . . . . . .
23
J.
Harbor Links Phase II, Grand Harbor Plat 19 - Final
Plat Approval for Planned Development as Requested
by GHA Harbor Ltd . . . . . . . . . . .
26
K.
Purchasing Manual - New Purchasing Bid and Award
Procedures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
27
L.
Equipment Declared Surplus for Sale . . . . . . .
28
M.
Award Bid #7006 - Hickory Sands Water Service -
Driveways, Inc . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
29
N.
Exchange County -Owned Land with Grimm for Easement
31
0.
Award Bid #7007 - Golf Ball Retrieval Services
Contract - Wabasso Golf - Sandridge Golf Club . .
35
P.
800 MHz Radio System/Fiber Optic Cable Connectivity
Interlocal Agreement - City of Vero Beach . . .
36
Q.
Floodplain Cut and Fill Balance Waiver - Indian
River Medical Center . . . . . . . . . . .
37
R.
Agreement with Hammock Lakes Associates for Paving
1st Street SW between 43rd and 58th Avenues . . .
38
S.
Storage of PEP Reef Forms - License for Use of Road
and Bridge Complex - American Coast Engineering
39
T.
Security Surveillance System - Lease Agreement -
Southern Security -Customer Service Area
(Utilities) . . . .40
U.
Temporary Wastewater Service Agreement - McNamara
41
V.
Resolution Accepting Dedication of Right -of -Way and
Cancelling Taxes - Dixie Oak Manor, Inc.
42
W.
Indian River Club - Agreement for Re -Use Water
Delivery . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
47
X.
Purchase 58th Avenue Right -of -Way from Laurel
Builders . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
47
Y.
Miscellaneous Budget Amendment #003 . . . . . . .
48
PUBLIC HEARING - CONSIDERATION OF LAND EXCHANGE FOR RELOCATION
OF
LUNDBERG ROAD & ADDITIONAL 58TH AVENUE RIGHT-OF-WAY
ACQUISITION
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
50
PUBLIC HEARING
- TOWER MORATORIUM ORDINANCE . . . . . . . .
57
rp-
99
wu-E517
BUOK
PUBLIC HEARING - PAVING & DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS TO 6TH LANE,
40th AVENUE SW (S. OF 5th STREET SW) AND DEUCE COURT IN
WEST SIDE SUBDIVISION - RESOLUTION III (CONFIRMING)
66
HEARING DATES FOR LDR AMENDMENTS (NOT RELATED TO TOWERS)
75
ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE REGULATIONS DISCUSSION . . . . . . . . .
78
ANNUAL REPORTS - SHIP PROGRAM . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
83
_ HOBART TOWER SPACE LEASE - SEXTON GROVE SERVICES . . . . .
86
BASE GRANT AGREEMENT - EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT, PREPAREDNESS AND
ASSISTANCE TRUST FUND CONTRACT . . . . . . . . . . . .
87
REQUEST TO USE NEW COURTHOUSE - CHRISTMAS IN DOWNTOWN . . .
89
AUCTIONEER SERVICES CONTRACT - SALE OF REAL PROPERTY: OLD
COURTHOUSE, ANNEX, & OLD STATE ATTORNEY BUILDING . . .
91
DEFEASE BONDS - SERIES 1985 AND 1988 . . . . . . . . . . .
94
COUNTYWIDE TRAFFIC SIGNAL RETIMING - REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS
FROM CONSULTANTS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
95
ADVERTISE FOR ENGINEERING SERVICES - REPLACE OSLO ROAD BRIDGE
AT LATERAL "J" CANAL . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
96
900 MHz COMMUNICATION SYSTEM - RETROFIT/ CONVERSION OF EXISTING
PUMP STATION SCADA SYSTEM . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
97
BID NO. 6067 - SUBURBAN ACRES (34th TERRACE) WATER SERVICE -
DRIVEWAYS, INC. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
98
WASTEWATER SERVICE FOR CUSTOMER ON DURRANCE PLACE . . . . .
99
ISSUE RFP FOR SPECIAL PUBLIC DEFENDER . . . . . . . . . . .
100
FAC SELECT COMMITTEE - TELECOMMUNICATIONS MEETING . . . .
101
DISCUSSION ON ETHICS ORDINANCE CONCERNING INDIAN RIVER MALL
GRAND OPENING INVITATIONS AND OTHERS . . . . . . ... .
102
CHILDRENfS SERVICES ADVISORY COMMITTEE REPORT . . . . . . .
103
SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL DISTRICT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
110
_I
Tuesday, November 5, 1996
The Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County,
Florida, met in County Commission Chambers, 1840 25th Street, Vero
Beach, Florida, on Tuesday, November 5, 1996, at 9:00 a.m. Present
were Fran B. Adams, Chairman; Carolyn K. Eggert, Vice Chairman;
Richard N. Bird; Kenneth R. Macht; and John W. Tippin. Also
present were James E. Chandler, County Administrator; Charles P.
Vitunac, County Attorney; and Patricia Ridgely, Deputy Clerk.
The Chairman called the meeting to order and Commissioner
Tippin led the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag.
ADDITIONS TO THE AGENDA/EMERGENCY ITEMS
Commissioner Bird requested addition of a discussion
concerning the Ethics Ordinance relative to recent invitations with
respect to the new Indian River Mall. (13.C.)
ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by
Commissioner Bird, the Board unanimously added
the above item to the Agenda.
1
November 5, 1996
e
BOOK UU 'A"A518
BOOK 9 9 PAGk5
PROCLAMATION - NATIONAL ADOPTION MONTH
Chairman Adams read aloud the following proclamation and
presented it to Betsy Barbatelli.
PROCLAMATION
WHEREAS,all children need the love, support and stability of
a family; and
WHEREAS, in the State of Florida, over 8,004 children are
living in substitute care away from their families of birth; and
WHEREAS, 1,700 of these children will not return to their
birth families and are in need of a loving, caring adoptive
family; and
WHEREAS, nearly all of these children have special needs;_
emotional, physical or mental disabilities, must be placed as a
sibling group, are of a minority race or are older; and
WHEREAS, in 1995, over 1,623 Florida children with special
needs were placed into adoptive families; and
WHEREAS, it has been proven that there are indeed families
able and willing to adopt children with special needs; and
WHEREAS, children waiting for adoptive parents and families
who have adopted these children require and deserve community
and public agency support to sustain their adoptions:
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT PROCLAIMED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA that November, 1996
be designated as
NATIONAL ADOPTION MONTH
in Indian River County, Florida, and the Board encourages
celebrations of families built through adoption and increased
awareness of the needs of children still waiting for permanent
homes.
Adopted this ,5 day of November, 1996.
6
November 5, 1996
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
Fran B. Adams, Chairman
PROCLAMATION - "THE COUNTY SWEEP DAY"
Chairman Adams read aloud the following proclamation and
presented it to Dane Roberts, president of Keep Indian River
Beautiful.
PROCLAMATION
WHEREAS, Keep America Beautiful was established in 1953 to develop more
responsible behavior toward the environment, and the Florida Solid Waste
Management Act of 1988 created Keep Florida Beautiful as an umbrella
organization for volunteer based community programs; and
WHEREAS, Keep Indian River Beautiful is one of over 500 national
affiliates of Keep America Beautiful and one of 29 certified and 13 pre -
certified State of Florida affiliates; and
WHEREAS,. Keep Indian River Beautiful is a working public/private'
partnership dedicated to grassroots community projects which protect the natural
beauty of Indian River County and enhance the area's quality of life; and
WHEREAS, Keep Indian River Beautiful is a non -prof#, environmental _
organization committed to helping local area governments solve community solid
waste problems, and is governed by a volunteer Board of Directors representing
government, business and industry, environmental, civic and professional
organizations; and
WHEREAS, Keep Indian River Beautiful is a county -wide system for
educational and promotional support for litter abatement, recycling,
beautification and other environmental programs; and
WHEREAS, programs implemented by Keep Indian River Beautiful qualify for
Department of Environmental Protection Grants and other federal and state grant
programs; and
WHEREAS, successful implementation of comprehensive solid waste programs
require cooperation of the City of Vero Beach, City of Sebastian, Town of Indian
River Shores, City of Fellsmere, Town of Orchid, Indian River County and the
various other governmental agencies; and
WHEREAS, implementation of successful, effective community enhancement
projects and educational programs require corporate, government and individual
donations and in-kind services; and
WHEREAS, The County Sweep is the inaugural program of Keep Indian River
Beautiful:
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT PROCLAIMED BY THE INDIAN RIVER COUNTY BOARD OF
COUNTY COMMISSIONERS that Saturday, November 16, 1996 be designated as
"THE COUNTY SWEEP DAY"
in Indian River County, and the Board urges all residents and business community
members to endorse Keep Indian River Beautiful, support and participate in this
clean-up program.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
Fran B. Adams, Chairman
Dated this 5 day of November, 1996`
9
November 5, 1996
DoG
�' E. JI O
BOOK 99 PAGE 521
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
The Chairman asked if there were any additions or corrections
to the Minutes of the Regular Meeting of October 1, 1996. There
were none.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by
Commissioner Bird, the Board approved the
Minutes of the Regular Meeting of October 1,
1996, as written.
The Chairman asked if there were any additions or corrections
to the Minutes of the Regular Meeting of October 8, 1996. There
were none.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by
Commissioner Tippin, the Board approved the
Minutes of the Regular Meeting of October 8,
1996, as written.
CONSENT AGENDA
County Attorney Vitunac requested the removal of Item 7.I. for
correction of a scrivener's error.
A. Received & Placed on File in the Office of the Clerk to the Board
1) Indian River Farms Water Control District, Minutes for FY
10/1/95-9/30/96;
2) Supervisor of Elections - Letter enclosing income from
lists, labels, etc., interest & balance in unexpended
funds from Elections budget at end of FY 95/96;
3) Clerk of the Circuit Court - Constitutional Officers
Financial Report for FY ending 9/30/96.
B. Approval of Warrants
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of October 17, 1996:
TO: HONORABLE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
DATE: OCTOBER 17, 1996
SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF WARRANTS
FROM: EDWIN M. FRY, JR., FINANCE DIRECTOR
4
November 5, 1996
In compliance with Chapter 136.06, Florida Statutes, all warrants issued
by the Board of County Commissioners are to be recorded in the Board minutes.
Approval is requested for the attached list of warrants, issued by the Clerk
to the Board, for the time period of October 11 to October 17, 1996.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by
Commissioner Bird, the Board unanimously approved
the list of warrants issued by the Clerk to the
Board for the period October 11 to October 17, 1996.
REST OF PAGE BLANK
5 BO go �'A q . 522
November 5, 1996
BOOK 99 [-AGE 523
CHECK
NAME
CHECK
CHECK
NUMBER
DATE
AMOUNT
0017937
HUSSAMY, OMAR MD
10/04/96
0017949
TIPPIN, JOHN W & DOROTHY A &
10/11/96
.00
60,585.30
0017950
BLAHNIK, CHRIS OR MILDRED
10/11/96
196.00
0017951
COLE, J DEAN, MD
10/14/96
400.00
0017952
FIRST UNION NATIONAL BANK OF
10/14/96
_
1,018.07
0017953
BARTON, JEFFREY K -CLERK
10/14/96
42.00
0209137
ZIMMERMAN, JOHN
9/05/96
0210367
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF MGMT
10/03/96
.00
0211101
A B C- C L I 0, INC
10/17/96
.00
33.81
0211102
A-1 TREE SERVICE
10/17/96
1,545.00
0211103
ACTION TRANSMISSION AND
10/17/96
60.00
0211104
ADRON FENCE COMPANY
10/17/96
755.51
0211105
ALBERTSONS SOUTHCO #4357
10/17/96
368.44
0211106
AMERICAN LEGION POST 39
10/17/96
29.00
0211107
ACTION ANSWERING SERVICE
10/17/96
254.40
0211108
APPLE MACHINERY & SUPPLY
10/17/96
388.80
0211109
AUTO SUPPLY CO OF VERO BEACH,
10/17/96
16.49
0211110
A B S PUMPS, INC
10/17/96
11,546.00
0211111
ALL POWER SERVICES, INC
10/17/96
4,020.00
0211112
ALPHA HEALTH SERVICE, INC
10/17/96
1,366.66
0211113
A T & T
10/17/96
35.66
0211114
ALL FLORIDA BEVERAGE & OFFICE
10/17/96
52.50
0211115
AMERICAN SOCIETY OF CIVIL
10/17/96
207.50
0211116
AMERITREND CORPORATION
10/17/96
395.00
-0211117
AKB PUBLICATIONS
10/17/96
33.00
0211118
ALDEN ELECTRONICS, INC
10/17/96
565.00
0211119
ANDERSON, DONNA C
10/17/96
71.68
0211120
AMERIGAS, INC
10/17/96
60.00
0211121
ATLANTIC COASTAL TITLE CORP
10/17/96
257.00
0211122
ALBERTSON'S
10/17/96
352.57
0211123
ALL COUNTY EQUIPMENT COMPANY
10/17/96
63.42
0211124
ASCET
10/17/96
40.00
0211125
AUTO PARTS OF VERO" INC
10/17/96
1,344.16
0211126
ACADDEMIX NURSERY ACADEMY
10/17/96
15.00
0211127
ADKINS, PAMELA A
10/17/96
500.00
0211128
ACCESSIBLE ARCHIVES, INC
10/17/96
350.00
0211129
ACE HIGH AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY
10/17/96
143.00
0211130
BAIRD, JOSEPH A
10/17/96
120.01
0211131
BAKER & TAYLOR, INC
10/17/96
1,169.05
0211132
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
10/17/96
3,406.22
0211133
BIRD, RICHARD N
10/17/96
3,281.98
0211134
BREATHING AIR SYSTEMS DIVISION
10/17/96
1,369.00
0211135
BROOKS, RONALD R
10/17/96
209.06
0211136
BARTON, JEFFREY K -CLERK
10/17/96
6,489.25
0211137
BERGGREN EQUIPMENT CO, INC
10/17/96
271.34
0211138
BRODART CO
10/17/96
125.40
0211139
BRODA, JANICE C
10/17/96
100.05
0211140
BOYNTON PUMP & IRRIGATION
10/17/96
156.82
0211141
B F I MEDICAL WASTE SYSTEMS
10/17/96
286.26
0211142
BAKER & TAYLOR ENTERTAINMENT
10/17/96
60.24
0211143
BELLSOUTH
10/17/96
16,822.34
0211144
BIG EYE LAND CLEARING &
10/17/96
500.00
0211145
BERMEX, INC
10/17/96
9,592.00
0211146
BAUER, JANICE
10/17/96
4.93
0211147
BOSEK, GIBSON & ASSOC INC
10/17/96
2,290.00
0211148
BASSOFF, JESSICA
10/17/96__
40.38
0211149
BLUE CROSS/BLUE SHIELD OF
10/17/96
7,766.00
0211150
BERLIN, MARY K, TRUSTEE
10/17/96
1,000.00
0211151
BALD WIN, W GLENN
10/17/96
45.00
0211152
CAMP, DRESSER & MCKEE, INC
10/17/96
29,462.30
0211153
CARTER ASSOCIATES, INC
10/17/96
725.00
0211154
CHANDLER EQUIPMENT CO, INC
10/17/96
425.48
0211155
CHLORINATORS, INC
10/17/96
2,147.37
0211156
CITRUS MOTEL
10/17/96
32.00
0211157
CLASSIC AWARDS
10/17/96
4.30
0211158
CLEMENTS PEST CONTROL
10/17/96
337.00
L
November 5, 1996
CHECK NAME
NUMBER
CHECK
CHECK
DATE
AMOUNT
0211159
0211160
COASTAL GRAPHICS
COMMUNICATIONS INT, INC
10/17/96
10/17/96
8,728.00
0211161
COMPUSERVE INCORPORATED
10/17/96
181.00
0211162
CLARK WATER CONDITIONING
10/17/96
10.85
0211163
COASTAL FUELS MARKETING, INC
10/17/96
80.75
15,691.32
0211164
CLINIC PHARMACY
10/17/96
0211165
CROSS CREEK APPAREL
10/17/96
56.29
0211166
CINDY'S PET CENTER, INC
10/17/96
1,983.85
0211167
CIVIL ENGINEERING NEWS
10/17/96
41.86
0211168
CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY PRESS
10/17/96
36.00
0211169
CLEANNET USA
10/17/96
407.41
0211170
CENTRAL FLORIDA LIBRARY
10/17/96
19,691.94
0211171
CROSSROADS ANIMAL HOSPITAL
10/17/96
500.00
0211172
CLIFFORD, MIKE
10/17/96
15.00
-0211173
CORPORATION OF THE PRESIDENT
10/17/96
100.00
120.50
0211174
CORNERSTONE SELECT HOMES, INC
10/17/96 �.
1,281.00
0211175
COSTANO BOOKS
10/17.96
73.90
0211176
CONTEMPORARY BOOKS INC
.10/17/96
54.95
0211177
CORAL WIND HOME OWNERS ASSOC
10/17/96
550.00
0211178
DAVES SPORTING GOODS
10/17/96
639.02
0211179
DEMCO INC
10/17/96
753.13
0211180
DOCTOR'S CLINIC
10/17/96
69.74
0211181
DUN & BRADSTREET
10/17/96
603.25
0211182
DATA SUPPLIES, INC
10/17/96
846.18
0211183
DIETZ, DANIEL
10/17/96
60.00
0211184
DAVIS METER/U` S FILTER
10/17/96
17,150.97
0211185
DEZZUTTI, JOHN
10/17/96
36.00
0211186
0211187
DARDEN RESTAURANT'S INC
E -Z BREW COFFEE SERVICE, INC
10/17/96
10/17/96
49,452.00
0211188
EMPIRE ENGINEERING, INC
10/17/96
5.25
75
0211189
ENVIROMETRICS, INC
10/17/96
.00
7,775.50
0211190
EAST COAST SOD
10/17/96
327.15
0211191
EDUCATIONAL DIRECTORIES, INC
10/17/96
150.00
0211192
ELPEX, INC
10/17/96
95.85
0211193
ENVIRONMENTAL WATERWAY
10/17/96
104.00
0211194
EDLUND & DRITENBAS
10/17/96
316.91
0211195
DISCOUNT GENEALOGY
10/17/96
32.50
0211196
EMERGENCY LINEN SUPPLY CO
10/17/96
612.68
0211197
0211198
F A H R O
FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP
10/17/96
10/17/96
181.15
3211199
FIRESIDE THEATRE, THE
10/17/96
15.50
30.93
0211200
FLORIDA ASSOCIATION OF
10/17/96
15.00
)211201
FLINCHUM CONSTRUCTION CO, INC
10/17/96
25.00
3211202
FLORIDA ATLANTIC UNIVERSITY
10/17/96
40.00
0211203
F P & L
10/17/96
13,992.98
3211204
FLORIDA RIBBON & CARBON
10/17/96__
372.50
0211205
FOURTH DISTRICT COURT OF
10/17/96
25U.uu
0211206
FLORIDA ANIMAL CONTROL
10/17/96
30.00
0211207
FLORIDA TIRE RECYCLING, INC
10/17/96
876.00
0211208
FLORIDA EMERGENCY MEDICINE
10/17/96
125.00
0211209
FLINN, SHEILA I
10/17/96
__
49.00
0211210
FLORIDA FIRE MARSHALL'S
10/17/96
100.00
0211211
FLORIDA ASSOCIATION OF CODE
10/17/96
60.00
0211212
FOWLER CARBONICS, INC
10/17/96
63.00
0211213
FLORIDA ASSOCIATION OF COUNTY
10/17/96
30.00
0211214
FERGUSON ENTERPRISES, INC
10/17/96
704.86
0211215
FLORIDA ANIMAL LEAGUE
10/17/96
16.00
0211216
FINKLIN, WILLIE JR
10/17/96
28.50
0211217
FINAL TOUCH POOLS & SPA, INC
10/17/96
50.00
0211218
GARBERS CONTRACTOR SUPPLY
10/17/96
1,777.05
0211219
GENERAL INSURANCE UNDERWRITERS
10/17/96
96.95
0211220
GEORGE W FOWLER CO
10/17/96
234.25
0211221
GLIDDEN COMPANY, THE
10/17/96
49.50
0211222
GOODKNIGHT LAWN EQUIPMENT, INC
10/17/96
165.70
0211223
GRACEWOOD FRUIT COMPANY
10/17/96
2,000.00
7
99 mu 524
November
5, 1996
BOOK
Boa . 99 ,.� E525
CHECK
NAME
CHECK
CHECK
NUMBER
DATE
AMOUNT
0211224
GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO, INC
10/17/96
348.36
0211225
GENERAL MEDICAL CORP
10/17/96
2,651.80
0211226
GOODYEAR TIRE COMPANY
10/17/96
770.44
0211227
GREAT LAKES INSTRUMENTS, INC
10/17/96
79.22
0211228
GREYHOUND LINES, INC
10/17/96
358.00
0211229
GEAC COMPUTERS, INC
10%17/96
2,511.75
0211230
GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER
10/17/96
1,709.78
0211231
GNB TECHNOLOGIES
10/17/96
631.60
0211232
GOVERNMENT INFORMATION SERVICE
10/17/96
668.80
0211233
HACH COMPANY
10/17/96
200.00
0211234
HARRIS SANITATION
10/17/96
56.62
0211235
HI -TECH SERVICING TECH
10/17/96
1,387.90
0211236
HUMANE SOCIETY OF VERO BEACH
10/17/96
16,800.00
0211237
HUNTER AUTO SUPPLY
10/17/96
1,076.31
0211238
HERITAGE BOOKS, INC
10/17/96
87.50
0211239
HOWARD JOHNSON UNIVERSAL TOWER
10/17/96
55.00
0211240
HACH SUPPLY
10/17/96
62.00
0211241
HANDI PRO HOMEOWNER SERVICE
10/17/96
240.00
0211242
HEWLETT PACKARD COMPANY
10/17/96
1,248.00
0211243
HAGEN, SARAH
10/17/96
38.00
0211244
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY SOLID
10/17/96
311.27
0211245
INDIAN RIVER ACE PAINT
10/17/96
62.74
0211246
INDIAN RIVER BATTERY
10/17/96
66.50
0211247
INDIAN RIVER BLUE PRINT, INC
10/17/96
24.00
0211248
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
10/17/96
60.00
0211249
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY UTILITIES
10/17/96
104.37
0211250
INGRAM
10/17/96
154.72
3211251
INDIAN RIVER ANIMAL HOSPITAL
10/17/96
30.00
3211252
INFORMATION ACCESS CO
10/17/96
7,175.00
3211253
INDIAN RIVER MEMORIAL HOSPITAL
10/17/96
61.13
)211254
ROY CLARK
10/17/96
375.00
)211255
INTERNATIONAL GOLF MANAGEMENT
10/17/96
68,333.33
)211256
IRC EMPLOYEE HEALTH INSURANCE-
10/17/96
96,617.94
)211257
HOMELAND IRRIGATION CENTER
10/17/96
3.99
)211258
JANIE DEAN CHEVROLET, INC
10/17/96
13.91
)211259
JOHNSTON, JOYCE M
10/17/96
57.04
)211260
JUNIOR LIBRARY GUILD
10/17/96
765.00
0211261
JONES CHEMICALS, INC
10/17/96
3,098.61
0211262
JOBE, JENNIFER
10/17/96
38.00
0211263
K MART
10/17/96
90.00
0211264
KEATING, ROBERT M
10/17/96
35.40
0211265
KIMLEY-HORN & ASSOCIATES, INC
10/17/96
652.41
0211266
KELLY TRACTOR
10/17/96
381.99
0211267
KIRBY AUTO SUPPLY
10/17/96
37.47
0211268
KDG D/B/A WILDCAT
10/17/96
58,700.00
0211269
LOFF, HAROLD JOE JR.
10/17/96
30.00
0211270
LONG, JAMES T ESQUIRE
10/17/96
7,800.00
0211271
LIBRARY CORP, THE
10/17/96
13,425.00
0211272
LIGHT SOURCE -TONER SUPPLY
10/17/96
706.65
0211273
LESCO, INC
10/17/96
142.00
0211274
LAPSCO INC
10/17/96
366.45
0211275
LIBRARY OF MICHIGAN
10/17/96
81.00
0211276
LLOYD, JOHN RALPH
10/17/96
36.00
0211277
LORICK, VIRGINIA C
10/17/96
15.00
0211278
LINCOLN, WILLIAM
10/17/96
15.00
0211279
LARGY BOOKS
10/17/96
163.00
0211280
MAX DAVIS ASSOCIATES
10/17/96
327.51
0211281
MIKES GARAGE
10/17/96
105.00
0211282
MILNER DOCUMENT PRODUCTS
10/17/96
465.84
0211283
MOSES AUTO PARTS
10/17/96
18.82
0211284
MOSS, KATHY
10/17/96
300.00
-0211285
MATRX MEDICAL, INC
10/17/96
713.70
0211286
MINNESOTA HIST SOCIETY
10/17/96
34.50
0211287
MCCORMICK, BETTY
10/17/96
20.00
0211288
M D MOODY & SONS
10/17/96
92.13
0211289
MICROFLEX MEDICAL CORP
10/17/96
213.00
8
November 5, 1996
-1
CHECK NAME
NUMBER
CHECK
CHECK
DATE
AMOUNT
0211290 M G B CONSTRUCTION
0211291 MARTIN COUNTY PETROLEUM
10/17/96
10/17/96
302.00
0211292 MILLER, JERALD D
10/17/96
538.73
0211293 MR BOB PORTABLE TOILET
10/17/96
33.00
0211294 MAIN STREET HARDWARE, INC
10/17/96
76.12
0211295 MCLAUGHLIN WELL DRILLING
10/17/96
74.16
0211296 NATIONAL HISTORICAL PUBLISHING
10/17/96
1,800.00
0211297 OFFICE PRODUCTS & SERVICE
10/17/96335.00
0211298 OMNI BUSINESS SYSTEMS, INC
10/17/96
1,068.45
0211299 ORYX PRESS
10/17/96
282.15
0211300 ON IT'S WAY
10/17/96
20.59
0211301 O NEIL, LEE & WEST
0211302 PARKS RENTAL
10/17/96
227.55
8,990.91
0211303 PEACE RIVER ELECTRIC
10/17/96
1Q/17/96v
46.92
0211304 PERKINS INDIAN RIVER PHARMACY
10/17/96
173.47
287.49
0211305 PETTY CASH
0211306 PETTY CASH
10/17/96
185.00
0211307 PHYSICIANS DESK REFERENCE
10/17/96
10/17/96
67.59
0211308 POSTMASTER- KEITH THOMPSON
10/17/96
66-.95
0211309 PRYOR RESOURCES, INC
10/17/96
109.60
0211310 POSTMASTER
10/17/96
99.00
0211311 POSTMASTER
10/17/96
104.00
0211312 PRICE, CHARLES CLAY
10/17/96
96.00
0211313 PINEWOODS ANIMAL HOSPITAL
10/17/96
15.00
356.50
0211314 PHELPS, ELLIS K
0211315 PRIME EQUIPMENT CO
10/17/96
10/17/96
1,548.94
_1316 RIFKIN, SHELDON H PHD
10/17/96
139.74
0211317 RUSSELL CONCRETE, INC
_
10/17/96
500.00
0211318 RUSSO PRINTING, INC
10/17/96
66.00
0211319 ROHANI, SASAN
10/17/96
28.76
0211320 ROTH PUBLISHING, INC
10/17/96
18.00
0211321 RANGER CONSTRUCTION IND, INC
10/17/96
= 775.20
0211322 REDSTONE, MICHAEL
10/17/96
630.00
0211323 RUBBER STAMP EXPRESS
10/17/96
206.89
0211324 RANGER CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRIES
10/17/96
17.22
0211325 ROWE, CAROLYN MCGOUGH
10/17/96
255,277.98
0211326 RADKE, PETER
10/17/96
38.00
0211327 SBCCI-PUBLIC SAFETY TESTING
10/17/96
294.06
0211328 SCHOPP, BARBARA G
10/17/96
60.00
0211329 SCOTTY'S, INC
10/17/96
892.50
0211330 SCOTTY'S, INC
10/17/96
868.06
0211331 SEBASTIAN BUSINESS SUPPLY, INC
10/17/96
40.98
0211332 SEBASTIAN, CITY OF
10/17/96
98.32
0211333 SEWELL HARDWARE CO, INC
10/17/96
150.00
0211334 SOLTTHARD, TERRY
10/17/96
167.71
0211335 SOUTHSIDE ANIMAL HOSPITAL
10/17/96
28.68
0211336 SAFESPACE, INC
10/17/96
15.00
0211337 STANDARD & POOR'S
10/17/96
1,250.00
0211338 STEIL OIL COMPANY
10/17/96
2.420.00
0211339 SUDDEN IMAGES
10/17/96
210.00
0211340 SUN AG, INC
10/17/96
77.13
0211341 SIMON & SCHUSTER CONSUMER
10/17/96
313.23
0211342 SUN TELEPHONE, INC
10/17/96
260.80
0211343 J A SEXAUER, INC
10/17/96
89.00
0211344 SUBWAY STAMP SHOP
10/17/96
164.55
0211345 SOUTHERN JANITOR SUPPLY
10/17/96
61.60
0211346 SUN BELT MEDICAL SUPPLY, INC
10/17/96
1.906.01
0211347 SEA TURTLE INN
10/17/96
1,467.80
0211348 SALEM PRESS, INC
10/17/96
310.52
0211349 SOLINET
10/17/96
76.00
0211350 STATE OF FLORIDA
10/17/96
425.67
0211351 STEWART INDUSTRIES
10/17/96
590.49
0211352 STUART LINCOLN MERCURY
10/17/96
574.31
0211353 SHEPKE, GEORGIANNA
10/17/96
112.85
0211354 SOUTHEAST DESALTING ASSOC
10/17/96
146.80
0211355 STEWART & NALL
10/17/96
375.00
15,000.00
9
November 5, 1996
BOOK 99
[JE526
10
November 5, 1996
BOOK 99 PAa 52i
CHECK
NAME
CHECK
CHECK
NUMBER
DATE
AMOUNT
0211356
SOUTHERN LOCK AND SUPPLY CO
10/17/96
107.61
0211357
SHERATON KEY LARGO
10/17/96
340.00
0211358
STEWART TITLE OF I.R.C.
10/17/96
13,773.00
0211359
SMITH, GARY R.
10/17/96
500.00
0211360
SETTLERS OF THE BEEKMAN PATENT
10/17/96
85.00
0211361
SESSIONS, ALESIA
10/17/96
105.00
3211362
SHAVER R W (FPL)
10/17/96
56.00
3211363
SCHARF, ALAN F
10/17/96
95.72
7211364
TECHNOLOGY PARTNERS
10/17/96
199.00
3211365
TREASURE COAST PROSTHETIC AND
10/17/96
70.00
)211366
TRANSPROTECTIVE SYSTEMS
10/17/96
288.75
)211367
TREASURE COAST COUNCIL OF
10/17/96
200.00
)211368
UMI
10/17/96
776.11
)211369
UPSTART
10/17/96
19.95
7211370
UMI
10/17/96
1,174.10
)211371
VELDE FORD, INC
10/17/96
6,127.64
)211372
VERO BEACH PRESS JOURNAL
10/17/96
99.00
0211373
VERO BEACH PRESS JOURNAL
_
10/17/96
106.32
0211374
VERO BEACH PRESS JOURNAL
10/17/96
206.10
0211375
VERO BEACH, CITY OF
10/17/96
33,510.52
0211376
VERO BEACH, CITY OF
10/17/96
9,175.00
0211377
VERO LAWNMOWER CENTER, INC
10/17/96
225.70
0211378
VERO BEACH POLICE DEPARTMENT
10/17/96
228.39
0211379
VERO BEARING & BOLT
10/17/96
117.65
0211380
VOLUNTEER ACTION COMMITTEE
10/17/96
25.00
0211381
VERO ON LINE INC
10/17/96
44.85
0211382
WAL-MART STORES, INC
10/17/96
493.11
0211383
WOODY'S PAPER & PRINT
10/17/96
165.89
0211384
WAL-MART STORES, INC
10/17/96
655.32
0211385
WAL-MART PHARMACY, INC
10/17/96
22.47
0211386
WAXE/WAVW RADIO
10/17/96
1,920.00
0211387
WILLHOFF, PATSY
10/17/96
130.00
0211388
WHEELER PUBLISHING, INC
10/17/96
141.32
0211389
WATERWORKS CAR WASH
10/17/96
96.50
0211390
WINDSOR PROPERTIES
10/17/96
500.00
0211391
WZZR-FM
10/17/96
500.00
0211392
WOLFE, MEGAN
10/17/96
57.00
0211393
WSCF-FM
10/17/96
300.00
0211394
WALGREENS PHARMACY
10/17/96
66.89
0211395
WIMES, JOE & LENORA S
10/17/96
1,211.00
0211396
WALTON, DORIS E
10/17/96
538.68
-0211397
WHITTINGTON, MEGAN
10/17/96
131.00
0211398
HAYNES, HANNAH
10/17/96
27.39
0211399
ATWATER, JEFFERY
10/17/96
13.73
0211400
FITZPATRICK SR, DONALD
10/17/96
5.88
0211401
SPITZA, CHARLENE
10/17/96
114.65
0211402
OVIAN, STEPHEN
10/17/96
107.22
0211403
ROBERTS, WILLIAM A
10/17/96
52.58
0211404
GILLETTE, TIMOTHY P
10/17/96
52.55
0211405
GLOVER, LAVADA R
10/17/96
52.55
0211406
BELL, ALLEN
10/17/96
105.04
0211407
STENGER, JOHN J
10/17/96
60.50
0211408
RIVERWALK EYE CENTER
10/17/96
100.00
0211409
BATTAILE, T BRUCE
10/17/96
18.17
0211410
TOZZOLO BROTHERS
10/17/96
39.10
0211411
BELLUM INTERNATIONAL INC DBA
10/17/96
39.93
0211412
SHINABERRY, STERL F
10/17/96
71.12
0211413
HELMET HOUSE CONST
10/17/96
24.96
0211414
THARPE, ARTHIE MARIE
10/17/96
35.74
0211415
CAL BUILDERS INC
10/17/96
17.07
0211416
R ZORC & SONS BUILDERS INC
10/17/96
68.32
0211417
REARDANZ, MARVIN
10/17/96
50.10
0211418
HOGAN, CHET
10/17/96
65.43
0211419
BURNETT SR, ROBERT
10/17/96
40.79
0211420
CAMPBELL, MARTHA A
10/17/96
36.79
0211421
BRANCH, CARLENE
10/17/96
6.39
7211422
DAVIS, ANTHONY R
10/17/96
21.46
10
November 5, 1996
CHECK NAME
NUMBER
CHECK
DATE
CHECK
)211423 FURSKOG, MATS & MELANIE
AMOUNT
)211424 WETHERINGTON, WILSON L
)211425 SHAFER, STUART
10/17/96
10/17/96
41.12
)211426 NANNI, ROBERT F
10/17/96
76.29
62.85
J211427 CUCURESE, MARY
10/17/96
14.07
)211428 HANDI PRO
10/17/96
9.55
0211429 VALENCIA, ENRIQUE
0211430
10/17/96
10/17/96
29.48
WATTERS, WARREN
0211431 COWAN, SCOTT R
10/17/96
75.41
75.50
0211432 WILLIAMS, PHIL A
0211433
10/17/96
10/17/96
14.27
MURPHY JR, JACK N
0211434 TURCOTTE, DAVID
10/17/96
_ 33.32
- 32.78
0211435 SABONJOHN, JAMES
0211436
10/17/96
10/17/96
29.62
GHO VERO BEACH INC
0211437 LEE, LARRY A
10/17/96
25.74
80.52
0211438 MARCELLE, EDITH E
0211439
10/17/96
10/17/96
9.11
SELLERS, BRIAN
0211440 CRE BROADCAS'T'ING CORP
10/17/96
28.87
9.24
0211441 VAN DOREN, MARSHALL R
0211442 HURST, CARLA
10/17/96
10/17/96
86.30
J
0211443 KOPOSESKY, FRANK
10/17/96
68.59
21.37
0211444 DYE, FRANCES E
0211445 MAHAN,
10/17/96
10/17/96
44.88
STEVEN
0211446 HOFFMAN, GAIL, M
10/17/96
25.58
28.71
0211447 RATHKE, FRANCIS L
0211448
10/17/96
10/17/96
12.40
DOTY, CHERYL
0211449 TRUMBLE, SHERRY
10/17/96
77.72
73.64
0211450 SUNSHINE BLDRS OF ST LUCIEINC
0211451 BEAZER
10/17/96 10/17/96
65.45
HOMES FLORIDA IN
0211452 PAUL, CHRIS
10/17/96
31.02
37.35
0211453 SCHRADE, JOHN p
0211454
10/17/96
10/17/96
18.60
SENIF, HOWARD & DOROTHEA
0211455 CALZADA, JOSE T
10/17/96
82.86
67.41
0211456 WHITNEY, IRENE L
0211457
10/17/96
10/17/96
64.24
ZWEMER, RODGER J
0211458 SMIAROWSKI, CATHY
10/17/96
24.47
44.17
0211459 FIRST NATIONWIDE MORT
0211460
10/17/96
10/17/96
5.38
ARCHIE, JEAN E
)211461 GAHN,
10/17/96
42.50
MICHAEL C
)211462 HAYNES, MICHAEL, K
10/17/96
32.48
13.95
)211463 NEIRA, INES
)211464
10/17/96
10/17/96
80.74
SALLAS, PAUL
)211465 VERTERANS ADMINISTRATION
10/17/96
35.02
22.81
0211466 JORDON, JENNIFER
)211467
10/17/96
10/17/96
28.30
ROSE, TIM
)211468 FANTAUZZI, NELSON
10/17/96
28.40
34.66
)211469 SMITH, JOINT B
)211470
10/17/96
10/17/96
52.60
MITCHELL, DENNIS W
)211471 MONTAQUE, DELROY
10/17/96
57.09
114.90
)211472 CHAMBERLAIN, EVERETT N
)211473
10/17/96
10/17/96
117.59
DOBSON, PRT
)211474 CASCIARI, JAMES
10/17/96
105.18
105.62
)211475 SMART, JAMES D
)211476
10/17/96
10/17/96
105.24
NICHOLSON, SHARON
)211477 ZOKVIC, CHARLES F
10/17/96
105.28
105.24
)211478 HARRIS, JOHN p
)211479
10/17/96
0/Li/96
105.22
WHITE, MARY JUDITH
)211480 EARMAN,
10/17/96
105.26
JOE H
'211481 CONATY, JAMES J
10/17/96
105.58
49.58
1211482 COMES, GARY H
10/17/96
10/17/96
105.26
1211483 LENNIES LOUNGE
:211484 HOLT, BUTLER E
10/17/96
52.60
157.70
10/17/96
52.61
11
November 5, 1996
1,000,999.19
r
Boa 99 FAE 529
C. Approval of Warrants
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of October 24, 1996:
TO: HONORABLE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
DATE: OCTOBER 24, 1996
SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF WARRANTS
FROM: EDWIN M. FRY, JR., FINANCE DIRECTOR
In compliance with Chapter 136.06, Florida Statutes, all warrants issued
by the Board of County Commissioners are to be recorded in the Board minutes.
Approval is requested for the attached list of warrants, issued by the Clerk
to the Board, for the time period of October 17 to October 24, 1996.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by
Commissioner Bird, the Board unanimously approved
the list of warrants issued by the Clerk to the
Board for the period October 17 to October 24, 1996.
CHECK NAME CHECK CHECK
NUMBER DATE AMOUNT
0017954
BARTON, JEFFREY K -CLERK
10/17/96
103.50
0017955
BARTON, JEFFREY K -CLERK
10/17/96
463.70
0017956
DAVIDSON, BRUCE
10/17/96
843.55
0017957
VERO BEACH, CITY OF
10/17/96
1,356.00
0017958
FIRST UNION NATIONAL BANK OF
10/18/96
63,257.58
0017959
NOLTE, DAVID C
10/18/96
250.00
0017960
HAND, MARGARET KNAPP
10/21/96
300.00
0017961
BARTON, JEFFREY K -CLERK
10/21/96
715.75
0017963
ATLANTIC COASTAL TITLE CORP
10/22/96
64.00
0017964
BARTON, JEFFREY K -CLERK
10/22/96
126.45
0017965
HOLIDAY INN
10/23/96
99.95
0017966
CLARKE, NOVA AND ARTHUR B
10/23/96
7,500.00
0017967
ADDRESS N' MAIL, INC
10/23/96
5,243.73
0211485
ACE PLUMBING, INC
10/24/96
74.04
0211486
AERO PRODUCTS CORP
10/24/96
1,462.79
0211487
AHR, C JONATHAN PHD
10/24/96
500.00
0211488
AIRBOURNE EXPRESS
10/24/96
21.00
0211489
APPLE MACHINERY & SUPPLY
10/24/96
723.03
0211490
AT YOUR SERVICE
10/24/96
2,584.18
0211491
A B S PUMPS, INC
10/24/96
794.00
0211492
A T & T
10/24/96
5.13
0211493
ALL RITE WATER CONDITIONING
10/24/96
99.00
0211494
A T & T WIRELESS SERVICES
10/24/96
45.24
0211495
ADAMS, TOM
10/24/96
245.05
0211496
A T & T LANGUAGE LINE
10/24/96
129.50
0211497
AMERICAN METEOROLOGICAL
10/24/96
55.00
0211498
AMERICAN DRILLING, INC
10/24/96
10,400.80
0211499
AUTO PARTS OF VERO, INC
10/24/96
303.29
0211500
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
10/24/96
12,905.31
November 5, 1996
12
CHECK
NAME
CHECK
CHECK
NUMBER
DATE
AMOUNT
0211501
BENSONS LOCK SERVICE
10/24/96
73.29
0211502
BARTON, JEFFREY K -CLERK
10/24/96
5,067.25
0211503
BERGGREN EQUIPMENT CO, INC
10/24/96
147.64
0211504
B & B INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY CO.
10/24/96
1,686.99
0211505
BARNETT BAIL BONDS
10/24/96
97.00
0211506
BONET, JAMES RN
10/24/96
80.00
0211507
BRODA, JANICE C
10/24/96
108.75
0211508
BARNETT BANK OF THE TREASURE
10/24/96
16.07
0211509
BET OUTH
10/24/96
907.56
0211510
BEAZER HOMES CORP
10/24/96
1,450.00
0211511
BAUER, JANICE
10/24/96
12.25
0211512
BIGGOMS, HENRY A
10/24/96
39.19
0211513
BASSOFF, JESSICA
10/24/96
20.19
0211514
BREVARD COUNTY GROWTH
10/24/96
28.45
0211515
CAMERON & BARKLEY COMPANY
10/24/96
69.58
0211516
CAMP, DRESSER & MCKEE, INC
10/24/96
981.00
0211517
CARTER ASSOCIATES, INC
10/24/96
4,853.51
0211518
CLEMENT COMMUNICATIONS, INC
10/24/96
206.18
0211519
COMMUNICATIONS INT, INC
10/24/96
45.00
0211520
CONSOLIDATED ELECTRIC SUPPLY
10/24/96
17.28
0211521
CORBIN, SHIRLEY E
10/24/96
45.50
0211522
COASTAL FUELS MARKETING, INC
10/24/96
16,040.52
0211523
CONNECT, INC
10/24/96
12.00
0211524
CLOVE HITCH FOUND, INC
10/24/96
300.00
0211525
CHIVERS NORTH AMERICA
10/24/96
44.64
0211526
CLIFF BERRY, INC
10/24/96
60.00
=1527
COMMONWEALTH LAND TITLE CO
10/24/96__
10,000.00
0211528
COOGAN, MAUREEN AND
10/24/96
540.20
0211529
CALLAWAY GOLF COMPANY
10/24/96
174.78
0211530
CASH CONTROL SYSTEMS
10/24/96
3,832.00
0211531
C4 IMAGING SYSTEMS, INC
10/24/96
36.99
0211532
CITY ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES
10/24/96
8,174.00
0211533
C C A HOLDINGS, LTD
10/24/96
155,510.62
0211534
C S R RINKER MATERIALS CORP
10/24/96
261.60
0211535
CENTRAL A/C & REFRG SUPPLY
10/24/96
2.68
0211536
DAVES SPORTING GOODS
10/24/96
101.25
0211537
DEMCO INC
10/24/96
556.94
0211538
FLORIDA DEPT OF MANAGEMENT
10/24/96
3,416.60
0211539
DAVIS, BETTY
10/24/96
9.00
0211540
DAVIDSON TITLES, INC
10/24/96
178.89
0211541
DADE PAPER COMPANY
10/24/96
713.84
0211542
DESIGNED TRAFFIC
10/24/96
26,711.50
0211543
DWYER INSTRUMENTS
10/24/96
53.93
0211544
DOUDS, KEN
10/24/96
100.00
0211545
DYKE, RODNEY
10/24/96
30.00
0211546
E -Z BREW COFFEE SERVICE, INC
10/24/96
334.50
0211547
ECKERD DRUG COMPANY
10/24/96
113.35
0211548
ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS
10/24/96
1,201.46
0211549
ENVIRONMENTAL WATERWAY
10/24/96
86.00
0211550
ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE CENTER
10/24/96
489.95
0211551
FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP
10/24/96
274.00
-0211552
FELLSMERE, CITY OF
10/24/96
18,190.00
0211553
FLORIDA EAST COAST.RA.ILWAY CO
10/24/96
8.30
0211554
FLORIDA ASSOCIATION OF
10/24/96
150.00
0211555
FLORIDA COCA-COLA BOTTLING CO
10/24/96
320.50
0211556
FLORIDA COURT REPORTERS
10/24/96
238.95
0211557
F P & L
10,/24/96
30,365.89
0211558
FRASER ENGINEERING & TESTING
10/24/96
40.00
0211559
FOOT JOY
10/24/96
2,587.57
0211560
FLOWERS BAKING COMPANY OF
10/24/96
147.40
0211561
FMC CORPORATION
10/24/96
4,440.00
0211562
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS
10/24/96
3,337.76
0211563
FERGUSON ENTERPRISES, INC
10/24/96
963.00
0211564
FLUKE TECHNICAL CENTER
10/24/96
94.60
0211565
FLORIDA HIGHWAY PRODUCTS, INC
10/24/96
57,610.23
0211566
FAB -RITE
10/24/96
375.00
0211567
FLORIDA TECH
10/24/96
11,312.14
0211568
GARBERS CONTRACTOR SUPPLY
10/24/96
166.69
13
November 5, 1996 BOOK 99 PAGE 3
F,
CHECK NAME
NUMBER
0211569
GAYLORD BROTHERS, INC
0211570
GENEALOGICAL PUBLISHING
0211571
GEORGE W FOWLER CO
0211572
GLIDDEN COMPANY, THE
0211573
GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO, INC
0211574
GENERAL MEDICAL CORP
0211575
GOODYEAR TIRE COMPANY
0211576
GRAY SUPPLY COMPANY
0211577
HARP.IS SANITATION
0211578
HARRISON UNIFORMS
0211579
HERE'S FRED GOLF CO, INC
0211580
HICKMAN'S BRAKE & ALIGNMENT
0211581
HILL DONNELLY CORPORATION
0211582
HYCOR CORPORATION
0211583
HARRIS SANITATION, INC
0211584
HRS INDIAN RIVER COUNTY PUBLIC
0211585
HORIZON NURSERY
0211586
HAYDON, FRANK A, M D
0211587
HEALTHSOUTH TREASURE COAST
0211588
HATFIELD, ERIC
0211589
HAGEN, SARAH
0211590
HINTON, GEORGE C
0211591
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
0211592
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY SOLID
0211593
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY PUBLIC
0211594
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY SCHOOL
0211595
INDIAN RIVER ACE PAINT
0211596
INDIAN RIVER BATTERY
0211597
INDIAN RIVER BLUE PRINT, INC
0211598
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY UTILITIES
0211599
INDIAN RIVER FARMS WATER
0211600
INDIAN RIVER MEMORIAL HOSPITAL
0211601
INDIAN RIVER MEMORIAL HOSPITAL
0211602
INDIAN RIVER MULCH
0211603
INDIAN RIVER OXYGEN, INC
0211604
INGRAM
0211605
INTERLINK COMMUNICATIONS OF
0211606
INDIAN RIVER FARMS
0211607
INDIAN RIVER OFFICE CENTRE,INC
-0211608
INSURANCE SERVICING &
0211609
I B M CORP-DVU
0211610
INVESTIGATIVE SUPPORT
0211611
INDIAN RIVER ALLFAB
0211612
INDIANA CASH
0211613
INTERIM PERSONNEL:VERO BEACH
0211614
HOMELAND IRRIGATION CENTER
0211615
JIM HARDEE EQUIPMENT CO INC
0211616
JUDAH, KAREN E
0211617
J A SEXAUER INC
0211618
JONES CHEMICALS, INC
0211619
K MART
0211620
KARSTEN MANUFACTURING CORP
0211621
KEEN'S FOODTOWN
0211622
KNIGHT & MATHIS, INC
0211623
KELLY TRACTOR
0211624
KIRBY AUTO SUPPLY
0211625
LONG, JAMES T ESQUIRE
0211626
LAB SAFETY SUPPLY, INC
0211627
LOGANS SHARPENING AND
0211628
LUCENT TECHNOLOGIES
0211629
MCCANN, C VINCENT
0211630
MIKES GARAGE
0211631
MILLER GOLF COMPANY
0211632
MYRON L COMPANY
0211633
MACMILLAN BUCHANAN INSURANCE
0211634
MIRANDA, FERNANDO G MD
0211635
MIZUNO GOLF COMPANY
November 5, 1996
14
BOOK 99 PAGE 531
CHECK
CHECK
DATE
AMOUNT
10/24/96
183.91
10/24/96
65.61
10/24/96
277.45
10/24/96
168.11
10/24/96
3,097_.91
10/24/96
285.59
10/24/96
260.44
10/24/96
72.03
10/24/96
1,081.20
10/24/96
224.24
10/24/96
62.30
10/24/96
542.58
10/24/96
90.59
10/24/96
12,189.71
10/24/96_
45,507.24
10/24/96
359.00
10/24/96
99.00
10/24/96
50.50
10/24/96
708.16
10/24/96
87.88
10/24/96
38.00
10/24/96
30.00
10/24/96
56,122.93
10/24/96
3,760.65
10/24/96
4,757.01
10/24/96
5,118.11
10/24/96
18.96
10/24/96
357.10
10/24/96
279.14
10/24/96
559.63
10/24/96
250.00
10/24/96
28.50
10/24/96
28.50
10/24/96
2,535.00
10/24/96
832.50
10/24/96
143.31
10/24/96
334.58
10/24/96
213.75
10/24/96
6.74
10/24/96
2,175.00
10/24/96
1,094.79
10/24/96
300.00
10/24/96
85.64
10/24/96
257.59
10/24/96
450.00
10/24/96
5.14
10/24/96
585.56
10/24/96
73.63
10/24/96
50.15
10/24/96
2,100.00
10/24/96
90.00
10/24/96
57.99
10/24/96
95.00
10/24/96
322.70
10/24/96
546.51
10/24/96
462.77
10/24/96
600.00
10/24/96
115.64
10/24/96
25.62
10/24/96
1,020.29
10/24/96
447_.30
10/24/96
85.00
10/24/96
1,052.64
10/24/96
54.54
10/24/96
1,101.75
10/24/96
14.00
10/24/96
39.00
CHECK NAME
NUMBER
CHECK
CHECK
DATE
AMOUNT
0211636 MCMASTER-CARR SUPPLY COMPANY
10/24/96
0211637 MACHO PRODUCTS, INC
10/24/96
265.03
0211638 MICROFLEX MEDICAL CORP
10/24/96
396.40
0211639 MR BOB PORTABLE TOILET
10/24/96
639.00
0211640 MAPS OF SOUTH FLORIDA
10/24/9662.28
0211641 NORTH SOUTH SUPPLY
10/24/96
222.50
0211642 NEFF MACHINERY, INC
10/24/96
292.48
0211643 N F P A
10/24/96
191.60
0211644 NEW HORIZONS OF THE TREASURE
10/24/96405.00
0211645 NATIONAL, PROPANE CORP
10/24/96
13,022.79
0211646 OMNI BUSINESS SYSTEMS, INC
10/24/96
210.23
0211647 OFFICE DEPOT, INC
10/24/96
20.00
0211648 ODYSSEY SPORTS, INC
10/24/96
230.22
0211649 OWENS, JEFF
10/24/96
243.94
0211650 ONSITE MANAGEMENT GROUP, INC.
10/24/96
92.63
0211651 PARKS RENTAL
10/24/96
31,845.60
0211652 PETTY CASH
10/24/96
79.11
0211653 PINTO, TERRANCE G
10/24/96
144.35
0211654 PRECISIONS SMALL ENGINE
10/24/96
918.94
0211655 PRIMA
10/24/96
1,630.00
0211656 PORT PETROLEUM, INC
10/24/96
220.00
0211657 PRECISION CONTRACTING
10/24/96
1.189.32
0211658 PRIMESTAR BY TCI CABLE
10/24/96 '
45,534.00
0211659 PROFESSIONAL COMPUTER SERVICES
10/24/95
39.95
0211660 RADIO SHACK ACCT RECEIVABLE
0211661
10/24/96
65.00
RIFKIN, SHELDON H PHD
0211662 RUSSO PRINTING, INC
10/24/96
76.44
500.00
0211663 RENT WEAR, INC
10/24/96
10/24/96
279.62
0211664 RAYSIDE TRUCK AND TRAILER
10/24/96
5,242.10
0211665 RANGER CONSTRUCTION IND, INC
10/24/96
18,750.00
0211666 R & G SOD FARMS
10/24/96
408.80
0211667 RISSMAN, WEISBERG, BARRETT,
10/24/96
60.00
0211668 RELIANCE PETROLEUM CO, INC
10/24/96
2.753.27
0211669 RAFTELIS ENVIRONMENTAL,
10/24/96
199.38
0211670 ROOFING AUTHORITY
10/24/96
10,032.84
0211671 RAUTH, GENE
10/24/96
4.500.00
0211672 SCOTTY�INC
10/24/96
34.80
0211673 SCOTTY S, INC
10/24/96
120.27S,
1
0211674 SHAW, DAVID D C
10/24/96
7.29
0211675 SNAP-ON TOOLS CORPORATION
10/24/96
167.00
0211676 SOUTHEAST WHOLESALE ROOFING
10/24/96
221.99
0211677 SOUTHERN CULVERT, DIV OF
10/24/96
286.80
0211678 SOUTHERN EAGLE DISTRIBUTING,
10/24/96
7,062.96
0211679 STATE CHEMICAL MFG CO
10/24/96
774.80
0211680 STATE OF FLORIDA
10/24/96
409.12
0211681 STONE BROS FUNERAL, HOME
10/24/96
3,523.18
0211682 SUNCOAST WELDING SUPPLIES, INC
10/24/96
900.00
0211683 SUNRISE FORD TRACTOR CO
10/24/96
143.89
0211684 SIMON &.9CHUSTER CONSUMER
10/24/96
166.94
0211685 SUN TELEPHONE, INC
10/24/96
395.79
0211686 SOUTHERN JANITOR SUPPLY
10/24/96
139.00
_
0211687 SCHWARZ, BERTHOLD E MD
10/24/96
85.31
0211688 SELIG CHEMICAL, IND
10/24/96
175.00
0211689 SYSCO FOOD SERVICE
10/24/96
396.25
0211690 STEWART INDUSTRIES
10/24/96
1.237.62
0211691 SEIG, DUANE L MD
10/24/96
30,301.75
0211692 SEBASTIAN, CI1Y op
10/24/96
24.00
0211693 SIVER INSURANCE MANAGEMENT
10/24/96
36,392.52
0211694 SYSTEMATIC SERVICES, INC
10/24/96
1,834.28
0211695 STM COMPANY/SAVE THE MOMENT
10/24/96_
5,027.30
0211696 SKALA, ERIC
-
10/24/96
45.00
0211697SEBASTIAN RIVER AREA CHAMBER
0211698 STEWART TITLE OF
10/24/96
57.00
2.500.00
I.R.C.
0211699 SECURITYLINK FROM AMERITECH
10/24/96
10/24/96
1.698.13
0211700 ST JOHNS RIVER WMD
10/24/96
- 850.42
0211701 SLP INVESTMENTS
10/24/96
14,910.00
0211702 TITLEIST DRAWER CS
10/24/96
14.95
1,809.15
15
November 5, 1996 ®
BOOK Qt�V FAuE 532
r
CHECK
NAME
CHECK
NUMBER
DATE
0211703
TURNER INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY CO
10/24/96
0211704
TREASURE COAST REFUSE CORP
10/24/96
0211705
TREASURE COAST CONTRACTING,INC
10/24/96
0211706
TECHNOLOGY PARTNERS
10/24/96
0211707
TESNOW, RONALD L
10/24/96
0211708
TREASURE COAST PUBLISHING INC
10/24/96
0211709
TOTALINE OF FLORIIDA
10/24/96
0211710
'TREASURE COAST COUNCIL OF
10/24/96
0211711
TERMINIX
10/24/96
0211712
TRI -COUNTY CONCRETE PRODUCTS
10/24/96
0211713
THIMMER, JAMES
10/24/96
0211714
TALLMAN, RICHARD JAMES
10/24/96
0211715
VELDE FORD, INC
10/24/96
0211716
VERO BEACH PRESS JOURNAL
10/24/96
0211717
VERO BEACH PRESS JOURNAL
10/24/96
0211718
VERO BEACH PRESS JOURNAL
10/24/96
0211719
VERO BEACH PRINTING CO
10/24/96
0211720
VERO BEACH, CITY OF
10/24/96
0211721
VERO BEACH, CITY OF
10/24/96
0211722
VERO LAWNMOWER CENTER, INC
10/24/96
0211723
VERO STARTER & GENERATOR
10/24/96
0211724
VETROL DATA SYSTEMS, INC
10/24/96
0211725
VITUNAC, CHARLES P
10/24/96
0211726
VERO RADIOLOGY ASSOCIATES
10/24/96
0211727
VERO BEARING & BOLT
10/24/96
0211728
VERO ORTHOPAEDICS
10/24/96
0211729
WAL-MART STORES, INC
10/24/96
0211730
WEST PUBLISHING CORP
10/24/96
0211731
W W GRAINGER, INC
10/24/96
0211732
WILLHOFF, PATSY
10/24/96
0211733
WM THIES & SONS, INC
10/24/96
0211734
WHEELER, GARY SHERIFF
10/24/96
0211735
WILEY PROFESSIONAL BOOKS BY
10/24/96
0211736
WABASSO'-GOLF, INC
10/24/96
0211737
WPAW-FM
10/24/96
0211738
WALGREENS PHARMACY
10/24/96
0211739
WBBE-FM
10/24/96
0211740
WOSN-FM,RADIO STATION
10/24/96
0211741
WAKELY AND ASSOCIATES INC
10/24/96
0211742
XEROX CORPORATION
10/24/96
0211743
ZANCA, MARY
10/24/96
0211744
MAIN, BARBARA A
10/24/96
0211745
TRU GREEN CORP
10/24/96
0211746
TOZZOLO BROTHERS
10/24/96
0211747
BRANDON CAPITAL CORP
10/24/96
3211748
LUNN, ROBERT
10/24/96
-3211749
CAL BUILDERS INC
10/24/96
3211750
NORTHERN, LEVONIA
10/24/96
D211751
JULIN. PAUL
10/24/96_
0211752
HOLIDAY BUILDERS
10/24/96
0211753
LIBONATI, GEORGE
10/24/96
0211754
RENO, THOMAS M
10/24/96
0211755
JEFFERSON, SHEILA
10/24/96
0211756
MATTE, MICHAEL D
10/24/96
0211757
BROXTON, KENDITH D
10/24/96
0211758
HUNT, JOYCE
10/24/96
0211759
SNACK BAR OF VERO BEACH INC
10/24/96
0211760
MC BEE, ANNETTE
10/24/96
0211761
HORIZON OUTLET CENTERS LTD
10/24/96
0211762
BERLIN, SCOTT
10/24/96
0211763
ADAMS, HEIDI
10/24/96
0211764
ROBB, BAYARD
10/24/96
0211765
SPENCER, STEVE
10/24/96
0211766
SPALLER, STEVE
10/24/96
0211767
BROWN, LAURA H
10/24/96
0211768
GROZA BUILDERS
10/24/96
0211769
LEWIS, CHARLES 0
10/24/96
0211770
LAPORTE, CHRISTINA M
10/24/96
November 5, 1996
16
BOOK 99 RAGE 533
CHECK
AMOUNT
55.48
30,713.96
17,773.73
129.00
404.95
155.00
29.17
40.00
95.00
1,889.00
68.88
355.68
142.71
198.00
767.40
1,310.74
601.00
56.36
6,227.60
86.10
140.00
134.00
120.60
67.00
281.87
55.00
142.85
158.79
1,108.82
104.00
190.20
4,748.58
84.95
300.00
150.00
153.94
380.00
395.25
1,500.00
2,291.06
4.90
44.26
353.64
28.90
64.35
14.76
33.21
25.99
23.16
56.91
33.63
30.18
13.70
20.56
33.11
27.40
246.62
14.36
74.78
136.90
44.57
62.69
1.42
25.74
2.33
39.43
43.08
40.44
� � r
CHECK
NAME
CHECK
CHECK
NUMBER
DATE
AMOUNT
0211771
SUERMONDT, RHONDA M
10/24/96
7.66
0211772
RUSNAK, KRZYSZTOF
10/24/96
25.34
0211773
BURGER, LONNIE L
10/24/96
34.98
0211774
REPOFF, SCOTT C
10/24/96
38.25
0211775
COMMUNICATIONS BY POIRE INC
10/24/96
337.03
-0211776
PLEDGER, INC
10/24/96
324.82
0211777
WOOD, KELLY •
10/24/96
105.60
0211778
GARY,WILLIAM & CARTER, SANDRA
10/24/96
98.70
0211779
ANDERSON, FRED
10/24/96
129.00
0211780
ATKINSON, R F
10/24/96
309.00
0211781
ADESHILE, ADONAI & F P & L
10/24/96
45.00
0211782
ADAMS, DONALD S AND EDITH B
10/24/96
258.00.
0211783
BEATTY RENTALS, INC
10/24/96
231.00
0211784
BROXTON, LYDIA
10/24/96
297.00
0211785
BRYANT WILLIAM D
10/24/96
475.00
0211786
BEUTTELL, PETER M
10/24/96
282.00
0211787
BILKEN GROUP
10/24/96
1,615.00
0211788
BERGER, HARRIS
10/24/96
85.00
0211789
BEANS, ROBERT
10/24/96
157.00
0211790
BELL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT
10/24/96
2,738.00
0211791
BOUYSSOU, STEPHANE H
10/24/96
522.00
0211792
BRYANT, ADRIAN AND CITY OF
10/24/9.6
24.00
0211793
BRUNO, FRANK
10/24/96
438.00
0211794
BROWARD COUNTY HOUSING AUTH
10/24/96
657.08
0211795
BAIN, ROSALIE AND CITY OF VERO
10/24/96
22.00
0211796
BROOKHAVEN, TOWN OF
10/24/96
620.08
0211797
BREVARD COUNTY HOUSING AUTHRTY
10/24/96
426._08
0211798
BROWN, HUBERT OR LOLA
10/24/96
282.00
0211799
BROWN, ANCEL
10/24/96
240.00
_3211800
BOULAHANIS, GEORGE
10/24/96
207.00
0211801
CARTWRIGHT, WILLIAM AND/
10/24/96
537.00
3211802
C/I MANAGEMENT
10/24/96
312.00
3211803
CORR, RHODA L
10/24/96
309.00
3211804
COLLINS, THOMAS H
10/24/96
632.00
3211805
CAIRNS, DAVID A
10/24/96
204.00
3211806
COSCO, KEN
10/24/96
809.00
3211807
CROZZOLI, ANTONIO OR PAMELA
10/24/96
224.00
0211808
CARLTON, ALLAN R
10/24/96
266.00
0211809
C P E ASSOCIATES
10/24/96
1,297.00
0211810
CAPAK, GERALD T
10/24/96
341.00
0211811
CUMMINGS, JERRY
10/24/96
_ 649.00
0211812
CHAPMAN, ALLISON & CITY OF
10/24/96
27.00
0211813
CORLEY, MARGARET
10/24/96
349.00
0211814
DOOLITTLE AND ASSOCIATES
10/24/96
2,561.00
0211815
DURST, GLENNA F
10/24/96
348.00
0211816
DEAN, JAMES
10/24/96
253.00
0211817
DUNMYER, DONALD E & GAIL L
10/24/96
333.00
0211818
DENNISON, WANDA
10/24/96
807.00
0211819
ESI, RESIDENTIAL RENTALS
10/24/96
431.00
0211820
ELWELL, JOAN A
10/24/96
487.00
0211821
FISCHER, HORST
10/24/96
808.00
0211822
FOGERTY, GEORGE A
10/24/96
533.00
0211823
FRESH, DANIEL J
10/24/96
199.00
0211824
FT PIERCE, CITY OF
10/24/96
1,238.16
0211825
FOURNIER, CATHY & FP&L
10/24/96
45.00
0211826
GILLESPIE, JOHN AND/OR GWEN
10/24/96
948.00
0211827
GASKILL, ROBERT
10/24/96
202.00
0211828
GOFF, JAMES T OR LUCILLE F
10/24/96
195.00
0211829
GRIMM, FLOYD OR HELEN
10/24/96
117.00
0211830
GIFFORD GROVES, LTD
10/24/96
6,121.00
0211831
GUERRA, RAYMOND
10/24/96
220.00
-0211832
HICKMAN, CARLA & F P & L
10/24/96
47.00
0211833
HILL, C J
10/24/96
1,735.00
0211834
HAWKINS, WANDA
10/24/96
331.00
0211835
HER.AN, WILLIAM AND/OR VIVIENNE
10/24/96
695.00
0211836
HERAN, SHAUNA
10/24/96
309.00
0211837
INCITCO REALTY, INC
10/24/96
310.00
0211838
INDIAN RIVER INVESTMENT
10/24/96
1,072.00
0211839
JAMESA DOOLITTLE & ASSOCIATES
10/24/96
12,601.00
17
November 5, 1996 BOOK 99 FAGG 534
BOOK 99 PAGE 535
CHECK
NAME
CHECK
CHECK
NUMBER
DATE
AMOUNT
0211840
JENSEIti, PETER C
10/24/96
286.00
0211841
JONES, MARCUS
10/24/96
243.00
0211842
JONES, DOROTHY
10/24/96
154.00
0211843
JORDAN, WILLIAM O
10/24/96
382.00
0211844
JONES, IDA AND FPL
10/24/96
12.00
0211845
JEFFERSON, RUTH
10/24/96
305.00
0211846
JONES, ALPHONSO
10/24/96
223.00
0211847
KAHLE, ESTHER
10/24/96
268.00
0211848
KIMOLA INTERNATIONAL, INC
10/24/96
224.00
0211849
KING, JOYCE AND CITY OF VERO
10/24/96
52.00
0211850
LAW, BEULAH
10/24/96
205.00
0211851
LAWRENCE, TERRY A
10/24/96
212.00
0211852
LLERENA, E D
10/24/96
403.00
0211853
LANGLEY, PHILIP G
10/24/96
237.00
0211854
LABELLA D.C, ARTHUR
10/24/96
312.00
0211855
LEISSING, CHARLES
10/24/96
500.00
0211856
LIZ SHERMAN REAL ESTATE
10/24/96
162.00
0211857
LANDERS, VIVIEN BONELLI
10/24/96
999.00
0211858
LEGGETT, DONALD E
10/24/96
152.00
0211859
MIXELL, LLONALD AND/OR
10/24/96
1,038.00
0211860
M O D INVESTMENTS
10/24/96
1,819.00
0211861
MONTGOMERY, WILLIAM
10/24/96
214.00
0211862
MANN, ROBERT OR WANDA ARMA
10/24/96
358.00
0211863
MINNIS, WILLIAM C JR
10/24/96
449.00
0211864
MILLER, GLEN G AS TRUSTEE OR
10/24/96
381.00
0211865
MASSEY, BENJAMIN T OR
10/24/96
376.00
0211866
MIDWAY ESTATES
10/24/96
216.00
0211867
MADSEN, KIRK
10/24/96
= 475.00
0211868
MORALES, CATHERINE AND CITY OF
10/24/96
10.00
0211869
MID FLORIDA RENTALS
10/24/96
423.00
0211870
MCLEAN, KATHYANN J
10/24/96
425.00
0211871
MALGERIA, PRISCILLA
10/24/96
411.00
0211872
MORRILL, TINA AND CITY OF
10/24/96
4.00
0211873
MILLER, ALVIN L
10/24/96
525.00
0211874
MCBRIDE, SHIRLEY
10/24/96
370.00
0211875
MONACO, TONYA & CITY OF VERO
10/24/96
26.00
0211876
NELSON, DONALD J & VALENTINE R
10/24/96
500.00
0211877
NICOTRA, ALFIO
10/24/96
404.00
0211878
O'CONNOR, DANIEL T & DEIDRA E
10/24/96
481.00
0211879
PARKER, RALPH & CITY OF VERO
10/24/96
42.00
0211880
PIUMELLI, DOMENICA
10/24/96
647.00
0211881
PALMER TRAILER PARK
10/24/96
415.00
0211882
PIERSON, JOHN H DBA
10/24/96
328.00
0211883
POSADO, LORI
10/24/96
341.00
0211884
QUINCY, EUGENE
10/24/96
550.00
0211885
REAGAN, WILLIE C
10/24/96
133.00
0211886
RENNICK, RONALD
10/24/96
477.00
0211887
RAUDENBUSH, ERNEST
10/24/96
132.00
0211888
REALTY CONNECTIONS OF VERO,INC
10/24/96
522.00
0211889
ROBERTS, DAVID E
10/24/96
201.00
0211890
REDDING, TERESA & CITY OF VERO
10/24/96
25.00
0211891
REARDANZ, MARVIN
10/24/96
430.00
0211892
RICHARDS, WILLIAM A
10/24/96
1,026.00
0211893
SALTER, CHRISTINE
10/24/96
397.00
0211894
SCHORNER, JAMES A
10/24/96
138.00
0211895
ST FRANCIS MANOR
10/24/96
3,274.00
0211896
SCROGGS, BETTY DAVIS
10/24/96
330.00
0211897
S B M RENTALS, INC
10/24/96
316.00
0211898
SABONJOHN, JAMES E
10/24/96
969.00
0211899
SACCO, JACQUELINE AND/OR
10/24/96
659.00
0211900
SEIBERT, CERISE
10/24/96
246.00
0211901
SAUCERMAN, JUDY
10/24/96
197.00
0211902
SORIANO, RAFAEL
10/24/96
417.00
0211903
SABONJOHN, FLORENCE
10/24/96
913.00
0211904
SANFORD HOUSING AUTHORITY
10/24/96
675.08
0211905
SMOAK, JEANETTE AND CITY
10/24/96
34.00
0211906
SLEASMAN, HOWARD M
10/24/96
470.00
0211907
SUMMERLIN, TERESA T
10/24/96
171.00
18
November 5, 1996
CHECK
NAME
CHECK
CHECK
NUMBER
DATE
AMOUNT
0211908
SHUMATE, OAKIE
10/24/96
322.00
0211909
SANDY PINES
10/24/96
869.00
0211910
STOUT, MELINDA AND F P & L
10/24/96
22.00
0211911
SHELTON, ROBERT L
10/24/96
476.00
0211912
STARCK, MICHAEL R
10/24/96
70.00
0211913
SQUIRES, STEPHANIE A
10/24/96
261.00
0211914
SOMERVILLE HOUSING AUTHORITY
10/24/96
438.08
0211915
SLAVENS, NANCY
10/24/96
221.00
0211916
SMITH, IRENE LINTON
10/24/96
247.00
0211917
SARTAIN, CHARLES S & TELECIA
10/24/96
389.00
0211918
SANDERS, NATALIE
10/24/96
209.00
0211919
'TROPICAL SHORELAND, INC OR
10/24/96
246.00
0211920
TITUS, SUSANNE OR
10/24/96
579.00
0211921
TOWN & COUNTRY LEASING
10/24/96
357.00
0211922
TIPPINS, STEPHANIE
10/24/96
292.00
0211923
VERO MOBILE HOME PARK
10/24/96
_ 217.00
0211924
VERO FIRST CORPORATION
10/24/96
1,284.00
0211925
BLAKE, SALLIE (WYNN)
10/24/96
296.00
0211926
WHITFIELD, DAVE DBA
10/24/96
217.00
0211927
WALTERS, KEVIN
10/24/96
211.00
0211928
WILLIAMS, TOBIAS M
10/24/96
461.00
0211929
YORK, LILLY B
10/24/96
202.00
0211930
YORK, DAVID
10/24/96
464.00
0211931
YATES, MARY JOE
10/24/96
255.00
0211932
ZANCA, LEONARD
10/24/96
474.00
0211933
ZORC, RICHARD J
10/24/96
182.00
1,056,998.59
D. Planning & Zoning Commission - Transfer George Hamner to At -Large
Position
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of October 18, 1996:
To: Board of County Commissioners
From: Fran B. Adams, Chairman
Date: October 18, 1996
Subject: Planning & Zoning Commission
Newly elected Commissioner Caroline Ginn would like to make an
appointment from her district on the Planning and Zoning Commission.
Because George Hamner has done such a fine job on the Commission, and
to provide some continuity in membership, I am requesting approval to
transfer him to the at -large position recently vacated by Dan Richey. This will
allow Caroline Ginn to make her appointment for District V.
19
November 5, 1996
boot ' SAG 36
BOOK 99 PA, E 537
ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by
Commissioner Bird, the Board unanimously approved
the transfer of George Hamner to the at -large
position on the Planning and Zoning Commission, as
requested in the Memorandum.
E. Attendance - 1997 FAC Legislative Conference
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of October 18, 1996:
TO: County Commissioners
FROM: Alice E. White, Executive Aide to the Board
DATE: October 18, 1996
SUBJECT: Travel Approval
Request approval for out of county travel for Commissioners to
attend the 1997 Legislative Conference of the Florida Association
of Counties in Tallahassee on November 20-22, 1996.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by
Commissioner Bird, the Board unanimously approved
out -of -county travel for Commissioners to attend the
1997 Legislative Conference of the Florida
Association of Counties (FAC) in Tallahassee from
November 20-22, 1996, as requested.
F. County Commission Bonds - Fran B. Adams and Kenneth R. Macht
ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by
Commissioner Bird, the Board unanimously approved
County Commission Bonds for Fran B. Adams and
Kenneth R. Macht, as submitted.
COPIES ARE ON FILE IN THE
OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
G. Economic Opportunities Council - Resignation of Eleanor Renuart
The Board reviewed a Letter of September 25, 1996:
Eleanor Renuart
675 Cypress Rd.
Vero Beach, F1.329_63
September 25,1996
Board Of County Commissioners,
Indian River County,
Administration Building 1840 25th St.
Vero Beach, F1.32960
20
November 5, 1996
r�.
Ile.
Dear Commissioners:
Please be informed that I am resigning from the
appointment to the EOC Board. I have served on this board
for several years and now feel that it is time for someone
else to be appointed. Thank you for this appointment, I
enjoyed serving on the board.
Sincerely,
ELEANOR RENUART
ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by
Commissioner Bird, the Board accepted, with regret,
the resignation of Eleanor Renuart from the Economic
Opportunities Council.
H. 1996 Transportation Disadvantaged Planning Grant - Progress Report
and Reimbursement Invoice #3
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of October 24, 1996:
TO: James E. Chandler
County Administrator
aAR T -HEAD CONCURRENCE
P
Robert Mt
. Keain4,A CPCommunity Develont Di ctor
7
FROM: Sasan Rohani, AICP J�
Chief, Long -Range Planning
DATE: October 24, 1996
RE: REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF THE THIRD PROGRESS REPORT &
REIMBURSEMENT INVOICE FOR THE 1996 PLANNING GRANT
It is requested that the data herein presented be given formal
consideration by the Board of County Commissioners at their regular
meeting of November 5, 1996.
It is required, as part of the Transportation Disadvantaged (TD)
Planning Grant contract between the Indian River County Board of
County Commissioners (BCC) as the Designated Official Planning
Agency (DOPA) and the State of Florida Commission for the
Transportation Disadvantaged (CTD), that periodic progress reports
and reimbursement invoices be submitted. To comply with the CTD's
requirements, staff has prepared a progress report and invoice for
the period from July 1, 1996 to September 30, 1996.
21
November 5, 1996 BOOK 99 PnE 538
a00K 99 wjE539
For the 1996 planning grant period, the invoice and progress report
represent the third submittal. This progress report and applicable
finished products, such as the Local Coordinating Board (LCB)
meeting agenda items, CTC reports, etc., are required to accompany
all reimbursement invoices.
Attached is a copy of draft invoice #3 and the progress report.
This report, along with the appropriate supporting documents, will
be submitted to the CTD upon the Board of County Commissioners/DOPA
approval.
On October 17, 1996, the Transportation Disadvantaged Local
Coordinating Board (TDLCB) reviewed and approved the attached
progress report and invoice. At that time, the TDLCB recommended
that the Board of County Commissioners, in its capacity as the
Transportation Disadvantaged Program Designated Official Planning
Agency (DOPA), approve the attached progress report and invoice and
forward these to the CTD.
Attached is a copy of the progress report and invoice for the July
1, 1996 to September 30, 1996 period.
Finished products such as TDLCB meeting agenda items, CTC reports,
and other pertinent reports are required to accompany all --
reimbursement invoices. These materials will be submitted to the
state along with the reimbursement invoice and the progress report.
The BCC/DOPA's alternatives are either to approve the transmittal
of the Progress Report and reimbursement invoice as submitted, to
approve transmittal of the Progress Report and invoice with
revisions, or to deny the transmittal of the Progress Report and
reimbursement invoice to the state. Choosing the last alternative
could affect the county's reimbursement of staff time expended for
transportation disadvantaged planning related services.
The TDLCB and the staff recommend that the Board of County
Commissioners/DOPA approve Progress Report and reimbursement
invoice #3, and direct staff to transmit the report and the invoice
to the State of Florida Commission for the Transportation
Disadvantaged (CTD).
ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by
Commissioner Bird, the Board unanimously approved
transmission of the progress report and
reimbursement invoice #3, as recommended in the
Memorandum.
RELATED DOCUMENTS WILL BE PLACED ON FILE
IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
WHEN PROPERLY EXECUTED AND RECEIVED
22
November 5, 1996
I. Kyle's Run - Final Plat Approval for a Multi -Family Residential Planned
Development
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of October 28, 1996:
TO: James E. Chandler
County Administrator
DIV SION HEAD CONCURRENCE:
f
/ ,se
Rober Keating, AI P /
Community Develop nt Di ctor
THROUGH: Stan Boling, AICP
Planning Director
FROM: John W. McCoy, AICP J y A
Senior Planner, Current Development
DATE: October 28, 1996
SUBJECT: CCA Holdings Inc.'s Request for Final Plat Approval for
a Multi -Family Residential Planned Development to be
Known as Kyle's Run
It is requested that the data herein presented be given formal
consideration by the Board of County Commissioners at its regular
meeting of November 5, 1996.
DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS:
Kyle's Run is a 200 unit multi -family planned development on 16.54
acres. The subject site is located on the north side of 8th Street
between 6th Avenue and Indian River Boulevard. At its February 20,
1996 meeting,the Board of County Commissioners granted conceptual
planned development and special exception use approval. Final plat
approval is required prior to the issuance of a certificate of
occupancy (C.O.) for any portion of the project.
On January 25, 1996, the Planning and Zoning Commission granted
preliminary plat/plan approval for Kyle's Run. All required
improvements for the development are controlled by that approved
plan. BSE Consultants Inc., on behalf of the CCA Holding Ltd.,,is
now requesting final plat approval, and has submitted a final plat
(site boundary plat) that is in conformance with the approved
preliminary PD plat/plan.
ANALYSIS:
Required improvements necessary to serve individual buildings
within the project are controlled via the PD plan inspection
process and will be inspected and approved on a building -by -
building basis. Prior to obtaining a certificate of occupancy
(C.O.) for any building, the required improvements necessary to
serve that building must be constructed by the developer and
approved by staff. All of the required improvements in the
development will be private, except certain utility improvements,
which_ will be dedicated._and .warranted separately prior to the
issuance of a C.O. for any building. Since the provision of
required internal improvements will be controlled through the PD
plan inspection process, and since the final plat conforms to the
approved preliminary plat/plan, the developer has complied with the
appropriate requirements to obtain final plat approval.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners grant final
PL plat approval for the Kyle's Run planned development.
23
November 5, 1996
BOOK 99 f'AG� 540
Bou 99 PAfjE 541
County Attorney Vitunac requested this item be separated to
announce a scrivener -type problem on the Plat submitted on page 45
in the backup material. Since the Plat has too many Tract A's, he
requested permission to redesignate one of them.
Deputy County Attorney Will Collins elucidated that Tract A is
a strip dedicated for Indian River County right-of-way in the
Plat's Certificate of Dedication. He explained that there is also
a Tract A (written at the top half of the Plat) which on the legal
description is called "Parcel All. Therefore, the large area on the
top half of the Plat which says "Tract All shall be corrected to
"Parcel All and the lower "Tract B" shall be corrected "Parcel B."
ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by
Commissioner Bird, the Board unanimously granted
final PD plat approval for the Kyle's Run planned
development as corrected above.
(Clerk's Note: See next page for corrected plat.)
24
November 5, 1996
1
h
1
LFGFNQ
• INDICATES PiRAOIEYT CONTROL PONT
O INDICATES 1/Y IRON ROD AND CAP SET
arervm L.S.39tr
• INDICATES WON ROD AND CAR FOUND
MARRED AS NOTED
O NONATq PpeIYQIR REFERENCE
IIOIRI-FAIT SR (t ■ r CONCRETE
INNER) STAKED
P.A.M. - P.L.S. 3917
■ RW -r -TES PERMANENT REFERENCE
MONUMENT FOUND MARRED AS MOM
A - NCLUDED ARGUE OF CURVE (DELTA)
C/1 - CHORD LETN0111 OF CURVE
Ce - CHORD KARNO Or CURVE
D.C. - DRAINAGE EASEMENT
T - TANGENT OF CURVE
L - TENDER OF CURVE
R - PAONS OI CURVE
(NR) - NON-RAOML LIC
(RR) - imam BGLR[NG
8/111 - RIGA -OF -way
t - CENEIa91E
MEASUIM
END. - FOUND
.
SPA. SEMEN - SANITARY SIM
-FLOW ZONE
BOUNDARY
7MQ PLAr M7EPAREO or
MIM," A LANE PLS'/ 3013
wee OOF611LTAtRS, NIG.
�o>rAl�a«NNor1r, w6 Nuw..e
... 9/11/96
-r
W•I Pe9 .•7i1,1n.
- KYLE'S RUN PLANNED DE VEL OPMENT -
A REPL(r OF A PORTION OF LOT TQ ! Wr le MW LAND COMPAW SUBDMSION,
AS RCCOR02D X PLAr BOOK A: PAGi 10, PUNX RSCORDS OF ST. LUClt COUM7; FLOMM
SECTION 12, TOWNSHIP 33 SOUTH, RANGE 39 EAST
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
' I 1
ZONING - RM -101
WEST 220.42 FEET
OF LOT 15
IINOT APART01( OF THIS PUT
PUT 803• PAGE 1�
II
�I
�I
ZONE 'X'
(TROPIC VILLAS)
ZONING - RM -10
LOT ♦ VERO LAND COMPANY SUBDIVISION
PLAT BOOK 3, PAGE 19
ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA--sarwyer 208743: _
I
1
$0022, w
— —•
— — — — —
S'- z
7.56'
2P,93*' L-"r�'—
J
30029.1 Tw 26Aw
ELEV . 7
NGVD
— - - -I -
3.6'
e - oruros• $ .
75• 75•
ZONING - RM -10
O
0 - 0027.14 I IT .21st eJ' ., «
l - t67 10
60
30 b 1 7 W
R . 2191 el' [
'
' N6g301fw IS
1—
1!' S.N_SEwER FnSE�SEN1—
wvw•14�w sis.2s soo'3i w ��CC
2139
L . 15.E
0T19'!TE '� r
1500'
'
nZONE -
y
--
IV8g30•t{•w aver
— tS' WATER MAIN FL�EY�t'
n
s
NegJo tai 1
— w6P3o'1{ w 11+1.00— I— —
—r
930'1{ w
1,
62.92•
I I I
PARCEL 'A'
s 9;79
CASEEMENT L=J�YT�iL�SP� 19,
Neg09{, W
ZONE 'X'
sI
[S' SAN SINE '29i 2 m
e EASIf
I I ?8 MEw
�EYL4M
TSeg3J'ME 270.12—
I
S'- z
�" PAGEBS1 1331
2P,93*' L-"r�'—
J
1S' WATER MAIN EASE4N7 -
T-w[ST' 211:'97-
ELEV . 7
NGVD
— - - -I -
�o
ZONE 'SRADED IC
G - Oe'SI'{
SW37'STE R1{200•
PARCEL 'Ir 1500, L . 21.9r
t38 SEE
DETAIL A - W51'41
Y 'v3 ^'N i C- L - 2It 129'
O - 4043'tr A - {0{3'tr .11 6.
R - 4507 DO R . {2.00' O�.�. %�69' / �1 R 200'7 R 5700'7
L - wAr L - Zox3 �e �e ,3e.2s I I L -los 7{ L - 1/0.92 �hP
1I .moi '
Y+ "ZLU•L_2A2jLL L /a►a7e62�7e E iS-
7�"•� MG1ttR YAOi EASEI�N� �j
,r1 �c _�1p•�
X �IS
ISIPLDESfI{DIM 1
1'w __ _ -a � �
ABElL50
�EYL4M
►J{aC[
tyg28'11 w - " SEE
tt7{.211
�" PAGEBS1 1331
B1N >�T (� DETAIL
ELEV . 7
NGVD
— - - -I -
-�_ _ B_ saOUTN LM or�S[4rIGp{ l2_}J_3p- - _ I-
NORTN TWE Or SEC1,tmV 13 -J3 -JA eA515 Of IHAPWC 56025't,'L
ZONING - RM -10
O
m
1
GRAPHIC SCAM
60
30 b 1 7 W
1rte
!S03W49''*M%13
,66{
RtliN
PANELNo. MAY {. 19e9
01"_
Comm No1201
$5,3.,.{(•:
'o'
+.NT -Ip�
pP25rw
6�
i¢~
PANEL No. 0166
{
r
'
surrm g
Is, UTILITY 11 ;ps Aft
CASEEMENT L=J�YT�iL�SP� 19,
Neg09{, W
7
$. a.
5677t.,
I,'11
e,
1► -02 in ppti
ABElL50
2
'�
i'
EASEYEKOR 2
00t
�" PAGEBS1 1331
FOUND 9OLT
18
ELEV . 7
NGVD
- - 12 7
13 8
S "E
LIV AIL
Io
m
1
GRAPHIC SCAM
60
30 b 1 7 W
( IN FEET )
I Inch - 80 fl.
_ SHEE1 Z OF -7-
RE
In
N
»
BOOK - 99 FAGS 543
I Harbor Links Phase H, Grand Harbor Plat 19 - Final Plat Approval for
Planned Development as Requested by GHA Harbor Ltd.
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of October 28, 1996:
TO: James E. Chandler
County Administrator
D ISI N HE CON URRE CsE:
Robert M. Keating,ICP
Community Developme t Di�tor
a
THROUGH: Stan Boling, AICP
Planning Director
FROM: John W. McCoy, AICP/
V)M
Senior Planner, Current Development
DATE: October 28, 1996
SUBJECT: GHA Harbor Ltd.'s Request for Planned Development (PD)
Final Plat Approval for Harbor Links Phase II, Grand
Harbor Plat 19
It is requested that the data herein presented be given formal
consideration by the Board of County Commissioners at its regular
meeting of November 5, 1996.
DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS:
Harbor Links Phase II, Grand Harbor Plat 19 is a plat of a 9.38
acre parcel located on the south side of the Grand Harbor harbor
area. The plat creates lots for 28 duplex units, two multi -family
tracts, and two recreation tracts.
On August 24, 1995, the Planning and Zoning Commission granted
preliminary PD plat/plan approval for Harbor Links, now known as
Harbor Links Phase II, Grand Harbor Plat 19. The developer is now
requesting final plat approval for Harbor Links Phase II, and has
submitted the following:
1. A final plat in conformance with the approved preliminary PD
plat/plan.
2. A contract for construction for remaining required
improvements.
3. An engineer's certified cost estimate for the remaining
required improvements.
4. An appropriate security agreement acceptable to the county
attorney's office.
26
November 5, 1996
ANALYSIS:
Some of the project's required subdivision improvements have been
constructed. The applicant is proposing to "bond -out" for the
remaining required subdivision improvements for Harbor Links Phase
II, as provided for in the county's land development regulations.
The public works department and utility services department have
reviewed and approved the submitted engineer's certified cost
estimate and corresponding letter of credit amount that covers the
costs of completing the remaining required improvements. The
county attorney's office has reviewed and approved the submitted
contract for construction (for completing the remaining required
improvements), and the letter of credit which represents 115% of
the estimated cost of construction. It should be noted that all
improvements within Grand Harbor will be private, with the
exception of certain utility facilities that will be dedicated to
Indian River County and warranted and secured separately, as
normally required by the utility services department.
RECOMMENDATION:
Based on the above referenced analysis, staff recommends that the
Board of County Commissioners:
1. Grant final plat approval for Harbor Links Phase -II (Plat 19),
and
2. Authorize the chairman to execute the submitted contract for
construction of remaining required improvements and accept the
letter of credit that secures the contract.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by
Commissioner Bird, the Board unanimously granted
final plat approval for Harbor Links Phase II (Plat
19); authorized the execution of the submitted
contract for construction of remaining required
improvements; and accepted the letter of credit that
secures the contract, as recommended in the
Memorandum.
K. Purchasing Manual - New Purchasing Bid and Award Procedures
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of October 22, 1996 and the
proposed new section 2.2 of the Purchasing Manual:
DATE: October 22, 1996
TO. Honorable Board of County Commissioners
THRU: James E. Chandler
County Administrator
FROM: H T. "Sonny" Dean, Director
Department of General Services
SUBJECT: Indian River County Purchasing Manual - Addendum
Purchasing Bid and Award Procedures
27
November 5, 1996 8000 99 PAGE 544
BOOK A5
BACKGROUND:
Chapter 105.06 of the Indian River County Code provides for a manual that outlines the Board's policy
for purchasing commodities and services. From time to time this manual requires addendums and changes
to provide updated guidelines in doing business with the public.
Due to recent problems with handling of contracts, staff has developed step by step guidelines which will
direct all employees in the proper manner to handle bids, awards, and insure proper disposition of
applicable contracts.
A copy of the proposed section of the Purchasing Manual is attached for your perusal.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends approval of the proposed Section 2.2 of the manual.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by
Commissioner Bird, the Board unanimously approved
the proposed Section 2.2, Purchasing Bid and Award
Procedures, as an addendum to the Purchasing Manual,
as recommended in the Memorandum.
L. Equipment Declared Surplus for Sale
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of October 28, 1996:
DATE: October 28, 1996
TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
THRU: James E. Chandler, County Administrator
H.T. "Sonny" Dean, Director General Service
FROM: Fran Boynton Powell, Purchasing Manage
SUBJ: Declare Equipment Surplus for Sale
BACKGROUND:
The attached list of the following equipment has been declared surplus to the needs of
the County.
ANALYSIS.
Staff recommends that authority be granted by the Board of County Commissioners to
declare these items surplus and authorize its sale.
FUNDING:
The monies received from this sale will be returned to the appropriate accounts.
RECOMMENDATION:
This will be place on the Surplus Property Sale open to the public as per Florida State
Statutes.
November 5, 1996
28
E- j
Surpius Vehicles and Equipment
Asset # Fleet #
Description
Serial number Department
n/a
n/a
qty. I - brown office chair
n/a
Building & Grounds
n/a
n/a
assorted metal cabinets
n/a
Building &Grounds
n/a
n/a
qty. 12 - unknown makchnodcl air conditioners
n/a
Building & Grounds
2662
n/a
IBM "typewriter
2941264
Community Development
3409
n/a
IBM Typewriter
264763713
Community Development
8675
n/a
Computer System
51707045098
Community Development
9268
n/a
Savin V35 Copier
8860201449
Community Development
9676
n/a
Computer System
8169939
Comnumily Development
9677
n/n
Quictwritcr Printer
52057059300
('onununily Development
10563
n/a
Citizen Printer w/sheet feeder
1130120318
Connnunity Development
11709
n/a
Computer System
002103
Community Development
11710
n/a
Computer System
002101
Community Development
11714
n/a
Computer System
002104
Community Development
12514
n/a
Computer System
91502754
Community Development
14103
n/a
Computer System
002550
Community Development
8818
n/a
IBM Proprintcr XL
470053189
Finance
12112.06
n/a
IBM Proprintcr Xl.
112080434
Finance
n/a
n/a
Monroe 1405 Calculator
E885213
Finance
4752
235
1983 16ft Utility Trailer
T167162818042083
Parks Dept
9205
n/a
Honda 21" mower
3002753
Parks Dept
9206
n/a
Ilonda 21" mower
300952
Parks Dept
8547
n/a
Power Supply
00198
Property Appraiser
8996
n/a
Canon A11100 typewriter
812030264
Veterans Service
3103.06
n/a
111M Electric Typewriter
320363
Welfare
7118
n/a
IBM Electric Typewriter
6400022
IRC -Public I lealth Dept.
2370.06
n/a
Exam table
n/a
IRC -Public Health Dept.
n/a
n/a
Savin 7015Z Copier
787020881-6
IRC -Public Health Dept.
13548
n/a
Flymo Mower
10800413
Sandridge Golf Course
14670
n/a
Flymo Mower
n/a
Sandridge Golf Course
14671
n/a
Flymo Mower
n/a
Sandridge Golf Course
12739
n/a
Portable Can Sorter
473G
SWDD-Landfill
n/a
n/a
15" Color Monitor
721255882
Utilities -Engineering
nia
n/a
Hycor Screen
n/a
Utilities-WRWWTP
ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by
Commissioner Bird, the Board unanimously declared
the items surplus and authorized their sale, as
recommended by staff in the Memorandum.
M. Award Bid #7006 - Hickory Sands Water Service - Driveways, Inc.
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of October 22, 1996:
DATE: October 22, 1996
TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS _
MRU: James E. Chandler, County Administrator
H.T. "Sonny" Dean, General Services Direct
FROM: Fran Boynton -Powell, Purchasing Manage
SUBJECT: Award Bid #7006/I3ickory Sands Water Service
Utilities Department
29
BOOK 99 I'Aa 5"6
November 5, 1996
BOOK 99 1AE 547
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
Bid Opening Date: October 16, 1996
Advertising Dates: Sept 27, Oct 2, 9, 1996
Advertisement Mailed to: Twenty (20) Vendors
Replies: Four (4) Vendors
VENDOR BID TOTAL
Driveways, Inc $ 20,442.41
Titusville, FL
Treasure Coast Contracting $ 23,013.70
Vero Beach, FL
Tim Rose Contracting $ 27,737.70
Ft Pierce, FL
Hutchinson Utilities $ 28,846.90
Jensen Beach, FL
TOTAL AMOUNT OF BID $ 20,442.41
ESTIMATED BUDGET $ 32,109.00
Utilities Assessment Funds- 473-000-169-301-00
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the bid be awarded to Driveways, Inc as the lowest, most
responsive and responsible bidder meeting specifications as set forth in the Invitation to
Bid.
In addition, staff requests Board approval of the attached Agreement as to form, when all
requirements are met and approved by the County Attorney.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by
Commissioner Bird, the Board unanimously awarded Bid
#7006 to Driveways, Inc. and approved the submitted
agreement as to form when all requirements are met
and approved by the County Attorney, as recommended
in the Memorandum.
BID/CONTRACT IS ON FILE IN THE
OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
30
November 5, 1996
N. Exchange County -Owned Land with Grimm for Easement
PUBLIC NOTICE
i m
PRESS -JOURNAL
Published Daily
Vero Beach, Indian River County, Florida `` s -1
i�1, -1 . •`f Zfi
COUNTY r.F INDIAN RIVER: STATE OF FLORIDA 1 i1 ,
Before the underskined authority Personalty appeared Darryl K. Hicks who on
oath says that the is President of the Press-Jaunal, a daily r�ewsPaper Pubtsh� at Vero Beach ;T �j. �I ��
in Indian River County, Florida; that the attached c�PY of advertisement, being I
a .�..' • me< rash
in the matter of 110
i• I a
in the Court' was pub- m
ftshed in said newspaper to the issues of
Affiant further says that the said Press-ioumal is a newspaper Published at Vero Beach, in
said Indian River Canty, Florida, and that the said newspaper has heretofore been
second da gnat matte atidIndian the post offirors�� BeachFlorida. each IInndian Rimnd qty Floridentered a,
for a period of one year next preceding the that. publication of the attached copy of
advertisement; and affiant further says that he has neither paid nor prorrh�ed any Person, thrrh
or adve �fa �ysdiscount.lication �re� or refund for
'� the purpose of securing this
sybscribed before me this =-�-- day of V A.D. 199
My C0rMi1. Ezpaes : i SA.\'DRAA. PRESLu1..:•u1,v., row.•.
August 25, 1997 a State of Florida. My co=mston Exp August Z5. 1997
No. =low =- Gomm
tPj
(SEAL)a`
�y;TFOF F1OQe��� Signed
~"wwwwwwww ouch: ANDRAA. PRESCarT
NOTICE OF EXCHANGE
OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY REAL PROPERTY
Notice is hereby given of the County's Intent to ex-
change a srnd parcel of Canty land for a small
Dparcel of land
arted above. owned by W. and Mrs. Grimm as de -
rhe Board of Carly Corers shelf consider
the "Change at its regular meetkv of Tuesday.
Novernberr 5, 1996 at 900 am in the County Ad-
ffinistratim
Florida
m Building, 1840 25th Street, Vero
BeacKAnyone who may wish to appeal any 'xim, which
may be made at this meeting will need to ensure
that a verbatim resod of the proceedings Is made, .
which hdudes testimony and evidence upon which
the appeal is
Any wnhgo needs a special aocoinmodation for
ft with Disabilities Acmay t (DA)) Coothe rdiAmericansnator at 567-
6m0a0e0U, Ext 223 at least 48 hours in advance of the
Oct. 3f, 1996 1347491
807
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of October 10, 1996:
DATE: October 10, 1996 _
TO: Honorable Board of County Commissioners
THRU: James E. Chandler
County Administrator
FROM: H T. "Sonny" Dean, Dire 1
Department of General Services
SUBJECT: County Owned Land Swap
BACKGROUND:
On October 1, 1996, the Board approved a land swap between Indian River County and Mr. & Mrs. Floyd
E. Grimm. In accordance with Florida State Statue, the subject transaction was advertised and a resolution
is hereby attached as required by the law.
31
November 5, 1996 BOOK 99 PAG� 548
BOOK 99 F'AGE 549
ANALYSIS•
Mr. & Mrs. Floyd E. Grimm has agreed to pay for all cost associated with surveys and paperwork. The
County will pay for their own title insurance.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends approval and requests authorization for the Chairman to execute the attached resolution.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by
Commissioner Bird, the Board unanimously adopted
Resolution No. 96-132 which authorizes the exchange
of real property, as recommended in the Memorandum.
RESOLUTION NO. 96- 132
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY,
FLORIDA, AUTHORIZING THE EXCHANGE OF
REAL PROPERTY.
WHEREAS, the County and Mr. and Mrs. Floyd E. Grimm both own
small parcels in close proximity to each other; and
WHEREAS, the County and Mr. and Mrs. Floyd E. Grimm are desirous
of exchanging said parcels; and
WHEREAS, Section 125.37. F.S. , empowers the County to make such
exchanges,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA that:
1. The Chairman is authorized to sign all necessary papers to effect
the exchange of the properties described in Exhibit "A" to this Resolution.
The resolution was moved to adoption by Commissioner Eggert
and the motion was seconded by Commissioner Bird , and, upon
being put to a vote, the vote was as follows:
Chairman Fran B. Adams Aye
Vice Chairman Carolyn K. Eggert Aye
Commissioner Richard N. Bird Aye
Commissioner Kenneth R. Macht Aye
Commissioner John W. Tippin Aye
The Chairman thereupon declared the resolution duly passed and
adopted this 5 day of November , 1996.
Attest:
Jeff TyK B ton Cl rk
November 5, 1996
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
By
Fran B. B. Adams
Chairman ^els Rvs :a hccroved Dare
A Jmin.
Legat L ��' y- 6
Bw) 3et
Gout
n 3M M fr
32
1
f]
F�
850.2'
EASEMENT DESCRIPTION
ft
3
NE Corner of
SE 1/4 of NW 1/4
Sec. 12-33-39
Sco%: 1"=60'
The North 15 feet of the West 209 feet of
of the SE 1/4 of the NW 1/4 of Section 12.
h
.,
of the North 184.41 feet
Range 39 East.
209'
I
k;J.
CERTIFICATION
�L-
I, Charles A. Cromer, hereby certify that .I
of Florida, that this
27.5'
,
I
supervision: and that
described in Chapter
si
Cpp�
pursuant to F.S. Chapter 472.
M�
PREPARED FOR INDIAN RIVER COUN r
Q
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
txe
THIS IS NOT A SURVEY
Charles A. Cromer, P.S.M. Reg. #4094
1840 25th St, Vero Beach, FL 32960
SKETCH TO ACCOMPANY LEGAL DESCRIPTION
O
(407) 567-8000
%27.5-12J.51
EASEMENT DESCRIPTION
ft
3
NE Corner of
SE 1/4 of NW 1/4
Sec. 12-33-39
Sco%: 1"=60'
The North 15 feet of the West 209 feet of
of the SE 1/4 of the NW 1/4 of Section 12.
the East 850.2 feet
Township 33 South,
of the North 184.41 feet
Range 39 East.
Lying in Indian River County, Florida.
Containing 3,135 square feet, more or less.
CERTIFICATION
I, Charles A. Cromer, hereby certify that .I
of Florida, that this
am a registered Professional Surveyor
and Mapper licensed to
pp practice in the state
sketch was mode under my immediate
that this sketch meets the Minimum Technical standards as
supervision: and that
described in Chapter
it is accurate and correct. I further ertify
61 G 17 the Florida
pursuant to F.S. Chapter 472.
of Administrative C zde,
PREPARED FOR INDIAN RIVER COUN r
Q
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
txe
THIS IS NOT A SURVEY
Charles A. Cromer, P.S.M. Reg. #4094
1840 25th St, Vero Beach, FL 32960
SKETCH TO ACCOMPANY LEGAL DESCRIPTION
Indian River County Surveyor
(407) 567-8000
Dote ,e• /9 9,c:::
0
a
C=i
0
m
C I T Y L I M I T S
V
dQIaO,j
- i
I
o.f.7�.ru I
BOO& 99 F,iu 551
j. T
f
IU S HIGHWAY NO 1 )
34
November 5, 1996
N
FOj
D
X
D
G)
M
CAI
to
M
r•
Qp
I
XWup•, Sumer, utak
Oil
714—
Q
0
-1 rd /oop1�3 n
10
.oO
so I
�
/y � le j.o.
I-• I
c Pae aeTY
Iror'• •� I
O• Z j
i�r
=.1
F
/•
.,
orr
go
I
.oma
to
�„ I C�•; / I�
nl
r
j. T
f
IU S HIGHWAY NO 1 )
34
November 5, 1996
N
FOj
D
X
D
G)
M
CAI
to
M
O. Award Bid #7007 - Golf Ball Retrieval Services Contract - Wabasso Golf
- Sandridge Golf Club
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of October 28, 1996:
DATE: October 28, 1996
TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
THRU: James E. Chandler, County Administrator
H. T. "Sonny" Dean, Director.��
General Services ,
FROM: Fran Boynton Powell, Purchasing Manage -
SUBJ: Award Bid #7007/Golf Ball Retrieval Services
Sandridge Golf Club
BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
Bid Opening Date: October 18, 1996
Advertising Dates: October 4, 11, 1996
Advertisement Mailed to: Seven (7) Vendors
Replies: Two (2) Vendors
Statement of "No Bids" One (1)
VENDOR BID TOTAL
Wabasso Golf $ 21,000.00
Wabasso, FL
The Golf Ball Company $ 13,500.00
Irving, Texas
Staff recommends the following:
1. Award the bid to Wabasso Golf as the highest bidder exceeding the
minimum bid of $12,000.00 as set forth in the Invitation to Bid.
2. Authorize the Purchasing Manager to renew this contract subject to
satisfactory performance, zero cost increase, vendor acceptance, and the determination that renewal is in the best interest of the County.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by
Commissioner Bird, the Board unanimously awarded Bid
#7007 to Wabasso Golf and authorized the Purchasing
Manager to renew their contract subject to
satisfactory -performance, zero cost increase, vendor
acceptance, and the determination that renewal is in
the best interest of the County, as recommended in
the Memorandum.
35
November 5, 1996 BOOK 99 Pn,6.5
BOOK 99 F -AE 553
P. 800 MHz Radio System/Fiber Optic Cable Connectivity Interlocal
Agreement - City of Vero Beach
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of October 28, 1996:
DATE: October 28, 1996 -
TO: Honorable Board of County Commissioners
THRU: James E. Chandler
County Administrator
FROM: H.T. "Sonny" Dean, Director
Department of General Services
SUBJECT: 800MHz Radio System/Fiber Optic Cable Connectivity
Agreement with City of Vero Beach
BACKGROUND:
In May of this year, the Board approved the new 800 NM radio system project which included installation
of a Fiber Optic Cable for connectivity between the north and south transmission towers. The proposed
cable link within the City of Vero Beach was proposed to use a portion of the City's fiber optic cable which
was already in place.
ANALYSTS:
Staff has been negotiating with the City to identify exactly each governmental entity's obligation toward
a successful project and insure everyone's needs were met. The results of this effort is reflected in a formal
written agreement The Vero Beach City Council met in regular session with their staff and approved the
agreement as submitted.
RECOMMENDATION•
Staff recommends board approval and requests authorization for their Chairman to execute the attached
agreement.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by
Commissioner Bird, the Board unanimously approved
the Interlocal Agreement with the City of Vero Beach
and authorized execution of same, as recommended in
the Memorandum.
INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT IS ON FILE
IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
36
November 5, 1996
Q. Floodplain Cut and Fill Balance Waiver - Indian River Medical Center
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of October 25, 1996:
TO: James Chandler
County Administrator
THROUGH: James W. Davis, P.E.
Public Works Director
and
Roger D. Cain, P.E. RT,rA• c.t. b�, Mc
County Engineer
FROM: David B. Cox, P.E.<2,c-
Civil Engineer
SUBJECT: Request for Floodplain Cut and Fill Balance Waiver for Indian River Medical
Center -
REFERENCE: SP -MA -96-12-49/96040135-002
DATE: October 25, 1996 CONSENT AGENDA
DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS
Knight, McGuire & Associates on behalf of Commons Medical, the developers of Indian
River Medical Center has requested a waiver of the cut and fill balance requirement of
Section 930.07(2)(d) of the Stormwater Management and Flood Protection Ordinance.
Indian River Medical Center received site plan approval from the Planning and Zoning
Commission on October 10, 1996. The project is located at 625 37th Street. The site is
located in special flood hazard area Zone AE with base flood elevation of 7.0 ft. N.G.V.D.
The ten year stillwater elevation is 4.0 ft. The proposed displacement of the floodplain
below 4.0 ft. for which the waiver is requested is 10,164 cubic yards as indicated in the
attached letter from the applicant's engineer dated September 27, 1996.
ALTERNATIVES AND ANALYSIS
The project meets the cut and fill balance waiver criteria provided in Section 930.07(2)(d)1.
of being situated in an estuarine environment within the 100 year floodplain along the
Indian River and in staff s opinion it appears that all other Stormwater Management and
Flood Protection Ordinance requirements can be met without adverse impact on other lands
in the estuarine environment.
Alternative No. 1
Approve the cut and fill balance waiver request.
Alternative No. 2
Deny the waiver request and require re -design to accomplish an on-site balance of cut and
fill.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends approval of Alternative No. 1.
37
November 5, 1996
BOOK 90 F -m 554
BOOK 90 PAGE 555
ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by
Commissioner Bird, the Board unanimously approved
the cut and fill balance waiver request, as
recommended in the Memorandum.
R. Agreement with Hammock Lakes Associates for Paving 1st Street SW
between 43rd and 58th Avenues
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of October 25, 1996:
TO: James E. Chandler,
County Administrator -
FROM: James W. Davis, P.E.,
Public Works Director
SUBJECT: Agreement with Hammock Lakes Associates for Paving of 1st Street SW
between 58th Avenue and 43rd Avenue
DATE: October 25, 1996
DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS
The developer of Hammock Lakes Subdivision, located south of 1 st Street SW east
of Kings Highway, has agreed to construct and fund 50% of the cost of paving 1st
Street SW between a point 500' east of Kings Highway to 43rd Avenue
(approximately .9 miles). Past precedent has allowed a developer to pay 50% of
the cost of paving a County Collector Road and the County pay the remaining
50%, consistent with the Special Assessment Program for collector roadways. The
cost to the County is estimated to be $154,467.90. The final cost will depend
upon actual bids received. 1st Street SW is one of the two remaining unpaved
collector roads between Oslo Road and Wabasso Road (11 miles) which are
unpaved east of Kings Highway.
ALTERNATIVES AND ANALYSIS
Staff has drafted the agreements and concur with the 50/50 cost share. Funds
were budgeted in the FY96/97 Capital Road Construction Program(copy attached)
in the amount of $300,000. The alternatives presented include:
Alternative No. 1
Approve the agreement and authorize the Chairman's signature.
Alternative No. 2
Deny approval.
RECOMMENDATIONS AND FUNDING
Staff recommends Alternative No. 1 whereby the agreement is approved and the
Chairman is authorized to execute it. Funding to be from petition paving funds
($300,000/year budgeted in the 10 Local Option Sales Tax Program).
38
November 5, 1996
1
ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by
Commissioner Bird, the Board unanimously approved
execution of the agreement with Hammock Lakes
Associates, as recommended in the Memorandum.
AGREEMENT ON FILE
IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
S. Storage of PEP Reef Forms - License for Use of Road and Bridge
Complex - American Coastal En ineering
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of October 16, 1996:
TO:
James E. Chandler.
County Administrator
TITROUGIT:
James W. Davis. P.E..
Public Works DIrecto
FROM:
Jeffrey R. Tabar.
Coastal Engineer J
SUBJECT:
License for Use of Road and Bridge Complex to Store
PEP Reef Forms
DATE:
October 16. 1996
DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS
American Coastal Engineering (ACE) requested pennission to store ten PEP Reef
fonns at the Road and Bridge Complex. By storing the fonns in Vero Beach. the
costs associated with mobilization and fabrication of any future reef units for the
County will be greatly reduced. Staff requested American Coastal Engineering
provide insurance holding the County harmless of any claims. American
Engineering has agreed to all conditions placed by Indian River County and has
signed a license agreement with the County. The County Attorney's office has
rendered the opinion that as long as a public purpose exists. it is legal for the
County to store the forms of a private company.
RECOMMENDATIONS AND FUNDING
Staff requests the Board of County Commissioners approve the license agreement
by authorizing the Chainnan to execute the agreement.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by
Commissioner Bird, the Board unanimously approved
execution of the license agreement with American
Coastal Engineering, as recommended in the
Memorandum.
LICENSE IS ON FILE IN THE OFFICE
OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
39
November 5, 1996
BOOK 99 f'AGE 5 1 56
I
BOOK 99 FAGS 557
T. Security Surveillance System - Lease Agreement - Southern Security -
Customer Service Area (Utilities)
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of October 24, 1996:
DATE: October 24, 1996
TO: JAMES E. CHANDLER
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
FROM: TERRANCE G. PINTO
DIRECTOR OF UTIL VICES
PREPARED ANA ANDERS N
AND STAFFED FRANCHISE C INATOR
BY: DEPARTMENT OF UTILITY SERVICES
SUBJECT: SECURITY SURVEILLANCE SYSTEM -CUSTOMER SERVICE AREA
The customer service area in the Department of Utility Services
currently does not have any security surveillance system in place.
The equipment that was previously being used is not functional and
can not be repaired.
Our customer service staff has been subjected to several situations
which has required the City of Vero Beach Police Department to be
called in for support.
The presence of security cameras can offer a deterrent to potential
robberies and will provide evidence and identification in the case
of a robbery. This system provides two portable alarm "panic
buttons" for police notification.
The staff of the Department of Utility Services recommends that the
Board of County Commissioners approve the attached agreement with
Southern Security and authorize the lease of a security
surveillance system for the customer service area in the
department.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by
Commissioner Bird, the Board unanimously approved
the lease agreement for a security surveillance
system for the customer service area in the
Department of Utility Services with Southern
Security Systems of Ft. Pierce, Inc., as recommended
in the Memorandum.
AGREEMENT IS ON FILE IN THE OFFICE
• November 5, 1996
OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
HUI
U. Temporary Wastewater Service Agreement - McNamara
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of October 16, 1996:
DATE: OCTOBER 16, 1996
TO: JAMES E. CHANDLER
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
FROM: TERRANCE G. PINT
DIRECTOR OF UTI SERVICES
PREPARED WILLIAM IN
AND CAPI TS ENGINEER
STAFFED BY: DEPARTM 4 UTILITY SERVICES
SUBJECT: TEMPORARY WASTEWATER SERVICE AGREEMENT
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY AND RICHARD E. McNAMARA
BACKGROUND
Richard E. McNamara has requested that temporary service be
installed from the sewer line on Roseland Road to service his
property at 13675 77th Court, Roseland, Florida 32958 prior to the
installation of a sewer main on 77th Court. This temporary service
will ultimately become part of our permanent sewer system for the
area.
ANALYSIS
The Agreement states that the Indian River County Department of
Utility Services shall provide temporary sewer service to Mr.
McNamara until such time that a sewer line may be constructed on
77th Court by assessment. He agrees to pay all fees required to
make this connection. He further agrees to participate in the
assessment and to reconnect to this sewer line as required by the
Indian River County Department of Utility Services. Construction
of this service lateral will be through the utilization of our
continuing labor contract, Driveways, Inc., with materials from US
Filter/Davis (the County's annual materials supplier), all through
the issuance of purchase orders.
Estimated costs are as follows:
Construction $4,000.00
Materials 500.00
Total $4,500.00
This work will be funded through the impact fee fund, with $500.00
immediately recovered from the homeowner, and the remainder to be
recovered at a future date through assessment of sewer in the area.
RECOMMENDATION
The Department of Utility Services recommends that the Board of
County Commissioners approve the attached Agreement with Mr.
McNamara and authorize the chairman to execute same as well as
authorize the issuance of purchase orders as described above.
41
November 5, 1996
BOOK F'�
BOOK
ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by
Commissioner Bird, the Board unanimously approved
execution of the agreement with Richard E. McNamara,
as recommended in the Memorandum.
RECORDED AGREEMENT ON FILE IN THE OFFICE
OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
99 Fv,,, 559
V. Resolution Accepting Dedication of Right -of -Way and Cancelling Taxes -
Dixie Oak Manor, Inc.
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of October 17, 1996:
TO: The Board of County Commissioners
FROM: V7f 1 William G. Collins II - Deputy County Attorney
DATE: October 17, 1996
SUBJECT: A Resolution to Accept Dedication of Right -Of -Way and to
Cancel Taxes on Same
A resolution has been prepared for the purpose of accepting a right-of-way
dedication and cancelling any delinquent or current taxes which may exist on
the following property acquired by Indian River County for public purpose:
Right -of -Way acquired from Dixie Oak Manor, Inc., a Florida corporation,
which right-of-way is fully described in that Right Of Way Deed recorded
in Official Record Book 1122 at Pages 2009-2010, Public Records of
Indian River County, Florida.
Authorize the Chairman of the Board of County Commissioners to execute the
Resolution accepting the dedication and cancelling certain taxes upon publicly
owned lands, and the Clerk to send a certified copy of same to the Tax
Collector so that any delinquent or current taxes can be cancelled.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by
Commissioner Bird, the Board unanimously adopted
Resolution No. 96-133 accepting a right-of-way
dedication and cancelling certain taxes upon
publicly owned lands, as recommended in the
Memorandum.
42
November 5, 1996
10/96(RESO\taxreso.52)LBGAL(WGC/nam)
Part of Parcel No. 10-32-39-00000-7000-00012.0
Dixie Oak Manor, Inc.
(right-of-way along Old Dixie Highway)
RESOLUTION NO. 96- 133
A RESOLUTION OF IRIDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA,
ACCEPTING A RIGHT-OF-WAY DEDICATION AND CANCZrZZNG
CERTAIN TABES UPON PUBLICLY OWNED LANDS, PURSUANT TO
SECTION 196.28, FLORIDA STATUTES.
WHEREAS, section 196.28, Florida Statutes, allows the Board of
County Commissioners of each County to cancel and discharge any and all liens
for taxes, delinquent or current, held or owned by the county or the state,
upon lands heretofore or hereafter conveyed to or acquired by any agency,
governmental subdivision, or municipality of the state, or the United States,
for road purposes, defense purposes, recreation, reforestation, or other
public use; and
WHEREAS, such cancellation must be by resolution of the Board of
County Commissioners, duly adopted and entered upon its minutes properly
describing such lands and setting forth the public use to which the same are
or will be devoted; and
WI "REM, upon receipt of a certified copy of such resolution,
proper officials of the county and of the state are authorized, empowered,
and directed to make proper entries upon the records to accomplish such
cancellation and to do all things necessary to carry out the provisions of
section 196.28, F.S.;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that:
1. The dedication of right-of-way as described in O.R. Book
1122, at Pages 2009-2010 of the Public Records of Indian River County,
Florida, is hereby accepted; and
2. Any and all liens for taxes delinquent or current against the
following described lands, which were acquired for right-of-way from
43
November 5, 1996 BOOK 99 FADE 560
BOOK 99 mu 561
RESOLUTION NO. 96- 133
Dixie Oak Manor, Inc., are hereby cancelled pursuant to the authority of
section 196.28, F.S.
See attached Warranty Deed describing lands,
recorded in O.R. Book 1122 at Pages 2009-2010,
Public Records of Indian River County, Florida.
The resolution was moved for adoption by Commissioner Eggert
and the motion was seconded by Commissioner Bird , and, upon being put to
a vote, the vote was as follows:
Fran B. Adams, Chairman Aye
Carolyn K. Eggert, Vice Chairman Aye
Commissioner Richard N. Bird Aye
Commissioner John W. Tippin Aye
Commissioner Kenneth R. Macht Aye
The Chairman thereupon declared the resolution duly passed and
adopted this 5 day of November
Attest:
4a-
� t
Jeffrey, arta Clerk
Aatt �
TAX CERTIFICATES OUTS-,V4r;adGU
CURRENT PROR, T;:" Trl'; ; ._:. `'� `"
f i;;
DEPOSITED W1 TH T i:_;
November 5, 1996
1996.
BOARD OF COUNTr COMMISSIONER
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
By ���- , Q/VA 8
Fran B. Adams. Chairman
a Cm>
yea no
44
APPROVED AS TO FORM
AND LEGAL SUFFICIENCY
BY'—rC�%!
WILLIAM G. COLLINS II
DEPUTY COUNTY ATTORNEY
r
W I T N E S S E T H:
That GRANTOR, for and in consideration of the sum of TEN DOLLARS
($10.00) and other good and valuable consideration to GRANTOR in hand paid by
GRANTEE, the receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, has granted, bargained
and sold to the GRANTEE, and GRANTEE'S assigns forever, the following
described land, situate, lying and being in Indian River County, Florida:
See Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof.
GRANTOR does hereby fully warrant the title to the land, and will
defend the same against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever.
Signed, sealed and delivered
in the pres6nce of:
printed name:
printed n Q's
STATE OF FLORIDA
COUNTY OF INDIAN RIVER
DIXIE OAK MANOR, INC.
By:
Thomas M. Reno, Vice President
b
(corporate seal) ^' "
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this0�"'day
ofIL
_ Y e r 1996, by Thomas M. Reno, the Vice President of Dixie Oak
Manor, Inc., a Florida corporation, on behalf of the corporation. He is
personally known to me or has produced F(_ as
identification.
APPROVED AS TO FORM
AND LEGAL SUFFICIENCY
BY°�
WILLIAM G. COLLINS II
DEPUTY COUNTY ATTOWVEY
November 5, 1996
NOTARY PUBLIC
printed nam :
Commission No.:
Commission Expiration:
45
BOOK
PAGE
O 9 6 2 0 % 4
96 OCT -3 PHI : IIs
This Rocnmeret wns prPrarei� by
and sbonld be returned to ,
9/96(PLAN\dixo)LEGAL(WGC/nhm)
the County Attorney's Officeg,
W1
U 1840 25th St., Vero Beach
()FEU $.-20
— Florida _ 02969
Nf)(F $
IN THE RECORDS r.-
JEFFREY K. BART Oto
Jf Ifl?fY K r)tiPTnN, CLERK
CLERK CIRCUITCOLn;T
110
I(vill,�fv IZIVtitLUUtJIY
INDIAN RIVER Co.,F1_►.
r
�! THIS INDENTURE, made this �
day of 1996
between DIXIE OAK =MR,
INC., a Florida
corporation, whose mailing address
is 6410 Old Dixie Highway, Vero Beach,
Florida 32967, hereinafter called
GRANTOR, and 33RDXM RIVER
COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of
Florida, whose mailing
address is 1840
25th Street, Vero Beach, Florida
32960, hereinafter called GRANTEE.
W I T N E S S E T H:
That GRANTOR, for and in consideration of the sum of TEN DOLLARS
($10.00) and other good and valuable consideration to GRANTOR in hand paid by
GRANTEE, the receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, has granted, bargained
and sold to the GRANTEE, and GRANTEE'S assigns forever, the following
described land, situate, lying and being in Indian River County, Florida:
See Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof.
GRANTOR does hereby fully warrant the title to the land, and will
defend the same against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever.
Signed, sealed and delivered
in the pres6nce of:
printed name:
printed n Q's
STATE OF FLORIDA
COUNTY OF INDIAN RIVER
DIXIE OAK MANOR, INC.
By:
Thomas M. Reno, Vice President
b
(corporate seal) ^' "
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this0�"'day
ofIL
_ Y e r 1996, by Thomas M. Reno, the Vice President of Dixie Oak
Manor, Inc., a Florida corporation, on behalf of the corporation. He is
personally known to me or has produced F(_ as
identification.
APPROVED AS TO FORM
AND LEGAL SUFFICIENCY
BY°�
WILLIAM G. COLLINS II
DEPUTY COUNTY ATTOWVEY
November 5, 1996
NOTARY PUBLIC
printed nam :
Commission No.:
Commission Expiration:
45
BOOK
PAGE
0
1
1
C \ \
Ln
\E \ X
Z \ \
O \ 1
s—
v
CERTIFICATION
300'
S. Line of N. 5 acres of S. 30 acres
C E P T
241.70'
0
I, Charles A. Cramer, hereby certify that I am a registered Professional
of Florida, that this sketch was made under my immediate supervision,
that this sketch meets the Minimum Technical standards as described in
purls -u -/ant to F.S. Chapter 472.
/ i7 .- /ter }•'+•ln
.C;
Charles A. Cramer, P.S.M. Reg. #4094
Indian River County Surveyor
010z98zZ 1 180
184a-.:251t3i -St,. -Vero
(407y 56_ :',8000
Scale: 1 "=50'
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
The West 14 feet, measured normal to the
o East right—of—way line of Old Dixie Highway,
N of the following described parcel:
Beginning at a point .on the East right—of—way
of Old U.S. No. 1 (66' wide) at the intersection
of the South line of the North 5 acres of the
South 30 acres of the NW 1/4 of the SE 1/4
of Section 10, Township 32 South, Range 39
N o East and run East 300 feet. Then run
South 200 feet. Then run
West 241.70± feet to the East right—of—way
of Old U.S. No. 1. Then run
Northwesterly, along the East right—of—way of
Old U.S. No. 1, to the POINT OF BEGINNING.
EXCEPTING therefrom the South 70 feet.
Containing 1,895.4 square feet, more or less.
Lying in Indian River County, Florida.
Surveyor and Mapper licensed to practice in the state
and that it is accurate and correct. I further certify
Chapter 61G17 of the Florida Administrative Code,
Beach, FL 32960
PREPARED FOR INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
THIS IS NOT A SURVEY
SKETCH TO ACCOMPANY LEGAL DESCRIPTION
Date /
CD
cli
C111
C:0
W
W. Indian River Club - Agreement for Re -Use Water Delivery
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of October 30, 1996:
TO: Board of County Commissioners
FROM: Lea R. Keller, CIA, Legal Assistant
THRU: Charles P. Vitunac, County Attorney
DATE: October 30, 1996
RE: Indian River Club - Agreement for Re -Use Water Delivery
The County owns and operates regional wastewater treatment plants
producing re -use water which may be used for irrigation purposes.
Indian River Club is the owner of a golf course and has applied to the
County to receive re -use water for irrigation purposes. The attached
agreement finalizes the details of the agreement between the County and
Indian River Club.
Requested Action: Staff recommends approval of this agreement and
requests the Board to authorize the Chairman to sign it.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by
Commissioner Bird, the Board unanimously approved
execution of the agreement with Indian River Club,
Inc., as recommended in the Memorandum.
AGREEMENT IS ON FILE IN THE OFFICE
OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
X. Purchase 58th Avenue Right -of -Way from Laurel Builders
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of October 28, 1996:
TO: Board of County Commissioners
FROM: Lea R. Keller, CLA, Legal Assistant
THRU: Charles P. Vitunac, County Attorney
DATE: October 28, 1996
RE: 58th Avenue R/W Purchase - Laurel Builders (Parcel #101-D)
47
November 5, 1996
BOOK 99 PAGL 564
BOOK 99 Inn 565
On September 20, 1994, the Board of County Commissioners approved the
purchase of an additional 56 feet of right of way from Laurel Builders
for improvement of 58th Avenue from State Road 60 to Oslo Road. This
purchase was to be made in three, equal annual installments, since
it would provide a more beneficial cash flow to the County within the
District 9 Traffic Impact Fee Fund. The County has made the first two
purchases and the attached contract covers the last $24,864 purchase.
It is executed by the seller and the County's Right of Way Agent.
Requested Action: Request the Board of County Commissioners approve the
final purchase and authorize the Chairman to sign the attached contract
on behalf of the County.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by
Commissioner Bird, the Board unanimously approved
the purchase of right-of-way from Laurel Builders
and authorized execution of the contract, as
recommended in the Memorandum.
COPY OF CONTRACT IS ON FILE IN THE OFFICE
OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
Y. Miscellaneous Budget Amendment #003
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of October 30, 1996:
TO: Board of County Commissioners
DATE: October 30, 1996
SUBJECT: MISCELLANEOUS BUDGET AMENDMENT 003
FROM: Joseph A. Baird
OMB Budget Director 1
DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS
The attached budget amendment is to appropriate funding for the following:
1. The Board of County Commissioners approved the FY 1996/97 EMS County Awards
Grant for the purchase of capital and operating equipment. The attached entry allocates
the funding.
2. On August 13, 1996 and July 2, 1996, respectively, the BCC approved renovations at
Douglas School and the purchase of a HVAC Digital Control System for the Main Library.
The attached entry appropriates the remaining funding for the completion of the projects
in the new fiscal year.
3. The County received a Federal Transit Administration Section 5307 (formerly Section 9)
grant and a Florida DOT Public Transit grant in 1995/96. The monies are passed through
to the Council on Aging. The capital portion of these grant are multi-year. The attached
entry appropriates the carry -forward capital grant monies available in FY 1996/97.
48
November 5, 1996
L-1
4. At the July 16, 1996 BCC meeting, approval was granted to use 911 surcharge funds for
the renovation of the E911 Communications Center and purchase of consoles and chairs
for the E911 Communications Center and the Vero Beach Police Department Public Safety
Answering Point. The attached entry appropriates the remaining funding for the
completion of this project in the new fiscal year.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners approve the attached budget amendment.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by
Commissioner Bird, the Board unanimously approved
Budget Amendment 003, as recommended in the
Memorandum.
TO Members of the Board
of County Commissioners
FROM: Joseph A. Baird
OMB Director
BUDGET AMENDMENT 003
DATE: October 30, 1996
Entry
Number
Funds/Department/Account Name
Account Number
Increase
Decrease
1.
REVENUE
ESD/EMS Grant
114-000-334-290.00
$52,026
$0
EXPENDITURES
ESD/ALS/Other Operating Supplies
114-253-526-037.31
$13,015
$0
ESD/ALS/Other Machinery & Equipment
114-253-526-037.24
$26,450
$0
ESD/ALS/Other Furniture & Equipment
114-253-526-037.23
$11,061
$0
ESD/ALS/Supplies
114-253-526-037.33
$1,500
$0
2
EXPENDITURES
General Fund/Buildings & Grounds/Building
Alterations
001-220-519-041.25
$5,380
General Fund/Buildings & Grounds/Building
Alterations
001-220-519-041.25
$42,650
General Fund/Reserve for Contingencies
001-199-581-099.91
$48,030
3
REVENUES
General Fund/Sec 9 Fed Transit -Co Aging
001-000-331-041.00
$97,946
General Fund/Fla. DOT Public Transit Grant
001-000-334-045.00
$12,244
EXPENDITURES
General Fund/Council on Aging
001-110-564-088.32
$110,190
4
REVENUES
911 Surcharge/Cash Forward - Oct.1
120-000-389-040.00
$144,717
EXPENDITURES
911 Surcharge/Other Improvements Except
Buildings
120-133-519-066.39
$50,749
911 Surcharge/Communications Equipment
120-133-519-066.45
$93,968
49
November 5, 1996
BOOK 99 PAGE 566
PUBLIC HEARING - CONSIDERATION OF LAND EXCHANGE FOR
RELOCATION OF LUNDBERG ROAD & ADDITIONAL 58TH AVENUE
RIGHT-OF-WAY ACQUISITION
PRESS -JOURNAL
Published Daily
Vero Beach, Indian River County, Florida
COUNTY OF INDIAN RIVER: STATE OF FLORIDA
Before the undersigned authority personally appeared Darryl K. Hicks who on
oath says that he Is PrursWerht of the Press -Journal, a daily newspaper published at Vero Beach
n Indian River County, Florida; that the attached copy of advertisement being
ca
in the matter of
in the Cant, was pub-
bhed
in said newspaper In the Issues of — /2 r-1. '� / 9 4F4
Affiant further says that the said Press lotrnal is a newspaper published at Vero Beach, In
said Indian River County, Florida, and that the said newspaper has heretofore been
corutinuxxlsly ptudfshed in said Indian River County, Florida, each daily and has been entered as
second Gass mad matter at the post otke n Vero Beach, in said Indian Rim County. Florida.
for a period of ane year ruext pretxrhg the ftrst pubdcadon of the attached copy of
�t and affiant fuathher says that he has neitiher Paid nor promised arty perstxh, firm
or corporation arty dboamt, rebate. oorrhmiasxxh or refuux! tux the purpose of setxuing tub
�t for pubdcaticn in said newspaper.
,�' s. ftg,pscribed before me N+Lq 2l day of G- � A.D.1
Why Comm. Fxl>ires :
SANDRA A. PRESCOTT. VOTARY PG'aL C. )
August 25, 1997 i State of Florida My Commission. Up. August 2S. 1997
No. =lowNumber
. e
d j:. jSEAL)
r Signed
clays: SA"fDRA A. PRESCOrr
50
November 5, 1996
PLIBILIC NOTICE
The fwd of Cmroy C.anmissinrhers, pmt
to Section 125.37. F.S.. will at its November 5,
1996, meeting consider adopting a resolution al ow-
ing an exchange of lend to provide for the rela-
tion ofLhnrlperg Road, approximately217 feet
ntxth of Its existing location. This lend exchange in-
volves Indian Rimcara 61.7 foot
wide right -way less hveytg except the easterly 40
feet to Sidney M. Sanacc, Jr. in exchangper for Sid-
fncconveying a 60 foot strip
an =Ri for the relocation fof L�>� g
Road plus additional property along 56th Avenue
for 58Uh Avenue fightof-way. The conveyance of
the land is made contingent: and corntitiahed on the
ibkwffq-
. Conveyance by Mr. Banack. of good and mar-
ketable ft, free of any erwvnbrances or lens,
unto Indian River Canty, all that ontain land in ro-
man River County, Florida, depicted below:
Praparty aat►ayd by 8aaack
N
2. C=by Indian AW Carly of good and
marketable title. dee of arty enaanbrances or liens,
of 61.7 feet lyig Northerly of and adjacent to the
Man Relief Canal nght-of-way, depicted below:
Property coawyed by Centrty
I
+N
3. Signalizatbn by IndianRiver Canty of the inter-
section of the road to be corhsWcted upon the real
property carwayed hereby, (new Lundberg Road)
and ICirgsas sash as bafilo volrrne war-
rents. to In camectbn with pencil
4. Men River s construatim of a new
Lund" Road n. with OW highway
at no expense to Mr. Battik* within Wmvty-fax
(24) months from date:
b Following construction of the new Lundberg
Road upon real property conveyed.Aeby, Vn-
turn in and right -tun out egress and agrees will be
permitted to Mr Banadr to arhd from his adiaOent
d
fie Board of County CCar mbsioners Me* to
will hheldthe r In ft County t Commission
Inge of
the County Admjn ftbon Buildlin9, located at 1840
25th Stree*. Vero Beach, Florida, an Tuesday.
November 6, 1996. at 9:01 am.
Anyone who wish to at my
which may be mo=at this meethg will read toe�n-
sue that a verbatim record of the proceed b
made which i des th
ude testimony mud
upon which the appeal will be based.
Anyone who needs a spgcW accommodation for
trisMeemust contaet the county's Ami
with Dio des Aux (ADA) Coordndw at 567-
8000. ext 233 at least 48 hags in advance of
ri'mN9an Riser Canty
Carimissioners
Bye.. -s -Fran B of .AAdams. Chairman
lit 22. 29,1996 1345169
M M M
With the aid of a graphic (page 133), Community Development
Director Bob Keating reviewed a Memorandum of October 24, 1996:
TO: James E. Chandler
County Administrator
N HEAD CONCURRENCE:
Obert M. Keating, AICP !/
Community Development Directo -
FROM: Sasan Rohani, AICP -
Chief, Long -Range Planning
DATE: October 24, 1996
SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF LAND EXCHANGE FOR THE RELOCATION OF
LUNDBERG ROAD AND ADDITIONAL 58TH AVENUE RIGHT-OF-WAY
ACQUISITION
It is requested that the data herein presented be given formal consideration by the Board of County
Commissioners at its regular meeting of November 5, 1996.
DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS:
Lundberg Road is an east/west road located approximately one half mile south of S.R. 60. Starting
at 58th Avenue, Lundberg Road runs to the west providing access to Indian River Community
College and other facilities.
Presently located within the right-of-way of the Main Relief Canal, Lundberg Road is the only paved
access to the Indian River County campus of Indian River Community College (IRCC). Because
Lundberg Road intersects with 58th Avenue at a sharp angle close to the main relief canal bridge,
the present alignment of the road is dangerous. Since IRCC plans a substantial expansion and that
expansion will increase Lundberg Road traffic volume, there is a need to relocate the road.
For these reasons, county public works staff has for the past year been working to relocate Lundberg
Road. In assessing the area, public works and planning staffs have determined that the best
alignment would be along the north boundary of the Banack property (adjacent property owner).
Locating Lundberg Road at that location would resolve the safety issue, and provide better
accessability for adjacent property. Proximate to Lundberg Road, 58th Avenue is also being
expanded, and additional 58th Avenue right-of-way is needed.
Although Lundberg Road is located within Indian River Farms Water Control District right-of-way,
the county owns a 61.7 foot wide road right-of-way adjacent to and north of the canal right-of-way.
The county's right-of-way, however, is not usable for Lundberg Road relocation because, like the
current road, that right-of-way is too close to the main relief canal bridge. That right-of-way,
however, is available to exchange for land suitable for Lundberg Road relocation.
51
November 5, 1996
Boa 99 wu 568
BOOK 99 FAGUE569
ANALYSIS
By relocating Lundberg Road to the north 60 feet of the Banack property, several issues will be
resolved. First, the road will be removed from the Indian River Farms Water Control District's
right-of-way. Second, safety will be enhanced by further separating the road from the Main Relief
Canal bridge. Third, accessability will be improved for the land west of Kings Highway between
S.R. 60 and the Main Relief Canal. Fourth, the resulting land configuration will better justify the
commercial land use plan amendment and rezoning requested by Mr. Banack. When relocated,
Lundberg Road will be a T intersection with 58th Avenue.
As proposed, the new Lundberg Road will be extended to Indian River Community College and
eventually further to the west if the college purchases land to the west. Lundberg Road will then
continue to 66th Avenue. Besides other advantages, the relocated Lundberg Road will provide back
entrances to several residential developments along S.R. 60. For those developments, the only
access is currently from S.R. 60.
Recently, Mr. Banack executed a deed to the county for the north 60 feet of his property. Currently
being held in escrow, this deed will be effective and may be recorded only after the county's
concurrence with the conditions requested by Mr. Banack. These conditions involve the county
deeding its 61.7 foot right-of-way adjacent to the Main Relief Canal to Mr. Banack as well as several
other conditions. These conditions are identified in the attached copy of the deed.
As part of this land exchange, Mr. Banack is conveying additional right-of-way needed along 58th
Avenue.
According to Florida Statutes Chapter 125, counties may exchange land with private parties if the
exchange is in the public's best interest. In this case, staff feels that the proposed exchange will
benefit all parties as well as resolve safety, accessibility, and other concerns. Staff feels that Mr.
Banack's conditions for the exchange are reasonable and recommends that the Board approve the
exchange.
Based on the analysis performed, staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners
approve the attached resolution which provides for exchange of lands needed for the relocation of
Lundberg Road and for the acquisition of additional 58th Avenue right-of-way.
52
November 5, 1996
Attachment 2 Q
I
m--e-RM-6
I I l o
S.R. 60
QTR 12 TR.I I TR. 10 TR.9
3 Z I CG
44 Z z I m
1 > H I h
� N
1 -RS-6 i A A-1
1-W,
T R
4 S 6
W' i 0 Z y
1 h Cl)
> . 0 1 k LO
= IA
i > I NEW LOCATION OF R•0 -W
� I{� 1 Property conveyed by Banec4
I1 TR 13-- ------- )TR1L
' I ( TR. 15 �
OLD LOCATION OF R-O•W
RM -6 Property conveyed by Ceunry�
I Ih»s and except the
easterly 40 feet)
I I
EXISTING LOCATION OF o
1
EXISTING
ROAD 1�
Ij I COMttDAMA�it "TY j " within canal R -0•W I�
,I COLLEGE (to be removed)
A-1 5 -1 4
16TH ST
r
BOOK 9 9 FACE 571
Director Keating advised of the conditions Mr. Banack placed
on the property exchange which relate to eventual signalization of
the new Lundberg Road/58th Avenue intersection (if and when
warranted), County construction of Lundberg Road within 24 months,
and access to his property (right in/right out) after 58th Avenue
is completed.
In recommending the property exchange, Director Keating
described it as a "win-win" situation and enumerated several safety
concerns which would be eliminated.
In response to questions from the Commissioners, Director
Keating advised that Indian River Community College is agreeable to
extending 18th Street and if the college acquires all the property
anticipated, the new Lundberg Road would extend all the way over to
66th Avenue. The south part of the new Lundberg Road right-of-way
will be 330' north of the existing road. It will be located
opposite the substation and will not align with the WalMart exit.
He foresaw no problem redesignating the parcel as Commercial. That
will be presented to the Board next week as one of five proposed
amendments to the Comprehensive Plan.
Chairman Adams inquired if the old road would be closed, and
Public Works Director Jim Davis responded that the pavement would
be removed completely and covered with grass.
Deputy County Attorney Will Collins advised that an
abandonment procedure will be probably forthcoming after the new
Lundberg Road is constructed.
The Chairman opened the public hearing and asked if anyone
wished to be heard in this matter. There being none, she closed
the public hearing.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by
Commissioner Bird, the Board unanimously adopted
Resolution No. 96-134 approving the exchange of land
needed for relocation of Lundberg Road and accepting
additional right-of-way needed for expansion of 58th
Avenue.
54
November 5, 1996
Attachment 1
RESOLUTION NO. 96- 134
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMUSSIONERS OF
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA APPROVING THE EXCHANGE OF
LAND NEEDED FOR RELOCATION OF LUNDBERG ROAD AND
ACCEPTING ADDITIONAL RIGHT-OF-WAY NEEDED FOR EXPANSION
OF 58TH AVENUE.
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners is responsible for the health, safety and
welfare of the public; and
WHEREAS, the existing location of Lundberg Road and its intersection at 58th Avenue is
unsafe; and
WHEREAS, the county needs additional right-of-way for expansion of 58th Avenue; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Sidney M. Banack is in agreement to provide necessary lands for re-
alignment of Lundberg Road and for expansion of 58th Avenue in exchange for the existing county
owned right-of-way; and
WHEREAS, Section 125.37, F.S. gives the authority to the Board of County Commissioners
to exchange any county owned lands with other real property when it is in the best interest of the
county; and
WHEREAS, per requirements of Section 125.37, F.S., public notices stating the Board of
County Commissioners intention to approve this resolution for exchange of lands needed for
relocation of Lundberg Road and expansion of 58th Avenue were published in the Press Journal on
October 22, and 29, 1996;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of Indian
River County, Florida that:
Section 1.
The above recitals are rammed in their entirety.
Section 2.
The Board of County Commissioners approve the exchange of lands needed for relocation of
Lundberg Road and additional right-of-way needed for expansion of 58th Avenue per attached
deeds.
55
November 5, 1996
BOOK 99 mu,E 572
BOOK 99.. FAGS 573
RESOLUTION NO. 96-134
The conveyance of the land is made contingent and conditioned on the following:
1. Conveyance by Mr. Banack, of good and marketable title, free of any encumbrances
or liens, unto Indian River County, all that certain land in Indian River County,
Florida per attached deed;
2. Conveyance by Indian River County of good and marketable title, free r'
encumbrances or liens, of 61.7 feet lying Northerly of and adjacent to
Relief Canal right-of-way, per attached deed;
3. Signalization by Indian River County of the intersection of the road to
upon the real property conveyed hereby, "new Lundberg Road", and Kind
as soon as traffic volume warrants, to be designed in connection with pen&
of Lundberg Road and Kings Highway;
4. Indian River County's construction of a new Lundberg Road in conjunction wi,
Kings Highway at no expense to Mr. Banack within twenty-four (24) months from
date;
5. Following construction of the new Lundberg Road upon real property conveyed
hereby, right -turn in and right -turn out ingress and egress will be permitted to Mr.
Banack to and from his adjacent property onto 58th Avenue (Kings Highway).
Section 3
The Board of County Commissioners authorize the chairman to execute all documents necessary to
effect the land exchange.
The foregoing resolution was offered by Commissioner Eggert , and Seconded
by Commissioner. Ri rd , and being put to a vote, the vote was as follows:
Chairman, Fran B. Adams Aye
Vice Chairman, Carolyn K. Eggert -Ty-e—
Commissioner, John W. Tippin Aye
Commissioner, Kenneth R. Macht Aye
Commissioner, Richard N. Bird Aye
The chairman thereupon declared the resolution duly passed and adopted this 5 day of
November .1996.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
of Indian River County
Fran B. Adams, Chairman
Attest By:.
Jeffrey K. Ba
Clerks
l
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGAL SUFFICIENCY
William G. Collins, H
Deputy County Attorney
u\v\s\lundreso
November 5, 1996
56
indim Riva Ca
AGGroved Cate
Admin.
V4111 IA) oZ
Legal
t�C
Budget
Dept.
�
1
M M M
PUBLIC HEARING - TOWER MORATORIUM ORDINANCE
PRESS -JOURNAL
Published Daily
Vero Beach, Indian River County, Florida
COUNTY OF INDIAN RIVER: STATE OF FLORIDA
Before the undersigned authority personally appeared Darryl K. Hicks who on
oath says that he is President of the: Press Journal, a daily newspaper published at Vero Beach
in Indian
now County, Florida; that Nes attached copy of advertisement, being
a'.4 09 lam.
in Use !natter of 2 L�
in the Court, was pub-
ush od in said newspaper in the issues of ; / 9 9 (_
Affiant further says that the said Press -Journal is a newspaper published at Vero Beach, in
said Indian RMer County, Florida, and that the said newspaper has heretofore bears
cwhdncrousy published In said Irdw River County, Florida, each defy and has been entered as
secpnd Gass mail matter at the post ottloe in Vero Beach, in sae Irhdian River County. Florida,
for a period of one year twat preceding the first publication of the attached Copy of
fit: and affiant further says that he has neither staid nor promised any persons, firm
or corporation any discount, rebate, commission or refund for the purpose of searing this
a&ertisement for publication in said newspaper.
PR
I 16%bpaited before me this_ day of. A D. 1�9/
My Comm. Expires
August 25,1997a S1tpR? A ?tEscva. �•r. x: - LL (15resident)
No. CC31MS r
State o! F1erda. tn• Comxssto^ En � :r�� 28. h99'
Commaeu r. \umbo- CO WKS
FOF.:I."""�
Signed
brzn• 5 . R•t A PRF.-� 37
Rer Board of �' of India�LICd�p�fs Provides notice o
2ndilly. Nom. tlp 05 AM. or
Cf lamb°'° -' h "tl1a tbullf► AQidlt� y
&+idttg. 1840 2F>ih Street. Vero Beech, Florida, tc
WP W ordnance of Indlan Rim Corot
OF FAXAN RIM COLWTy
RL R�� WAOM MORA-
A� FOR OF PERIYBTS AND
�O a FORWIRELMOMMLICTION OF
��TXM FACILITIES;
SMAS AND EFFECTIVE FORTH
1111198tad partible
be w � Weer at the meeting and
to WWbd
Anyone who wart minsPeect thepropoaee�dnsnoe.
n�'8 mmaeyy do so at the Otece of the Geri 13o Cie
Board, t840 25rd-
th street Vara
*W10 Who MBY WM m �deaslon wttich
m1, friade,
beft record of-eeting w1 need Wocaldrigeto ensure
whioh
theWON is kkdm tllls� and upon Which
�tled
who needs a spedd a000mftodation for
With D tlN A� �A)tCpOWS
800wdirliOr at 567.
10. Ext 223. at IBM 48 hoes In advance of the
19ft 1344950
County Attorney Vitunac briefly reviewed his Memorandum of
October 29, 1996 and the proposed ordinance, advising that four
exceptions were enumerated in same but that a fifth one (not
listed) is also being proposed:
TO: Board of County Commissioners
FROM: Charles P. vi�unac,County Attorney
DATE: October 29, 1996
RE: Tower Moratorium Ordinance
At the October 15, 1996, meeting of the Board of County Commissioners, the
Board directed our office to prepare a moratorium ordinance on the permitting
of telecommunication towers in Indian River County to allow time for the
County to study tower siting issues and develop additional protective zoning
ordinances, if any are necessary.
The attached ordinance would prohibit the permitting by the County of addi-
tional telecommunication towers for a period of six months or until land
development regulations have been adopted, whichever occurs first. The
ordinance would not -prohibit the construction of telecommunication facilities
on existing towers or on other high structures, nor would it place additional
57
November 5, 1996 BOOK 99 PAGE 574
BOOK 99 F -AGE 575
restrictions on amateur radio towers. The ordinance also would not apply to
any tower application which was accepted in completed form before the
effective date _of this ordinance or to any governmental utility or EMS
towers.
The ordinance has been properly advertised as a regular County ordinance;
therefore, it does not need any special treatment as an emergency ordinance
and is ready for adoption by the Board by a vote of three commissioners.
Planning Director Stan Boling reviewed 5 exceptions to the
ordinance as follows:
EXCEPTIONS TO TOWER MORATnRIUM
1) COMPLETE APPLICATIONS FOR TOWERS FILED PRIOR TO
THIS DATE
2) GOVERNMENT OR EMERGENCY SERVICES TOWERS
3) REPAIR AND REPLACEMENT OF EXISTING TOWERS
4) AMATEUR RADIO COMMUNICATIONS FACILITIES
5) ANTENNAS PUT ON EXISTING STRUCTURES (Total
Height Not To Exceed 110W)
With respect to the first exception above, Director Boling
advised of two recent applications which have not yet been
approved. One is scheduled to come before the Board for approval
on December 3rd. Another application came in yesterday afternoon
and was reviewed by staff this morning and appeared to be complete.
Director Boling explained that the 5th exception above was
being proposed for consideration since the current tower ordinance
would not allow for antennas to be placed on existing structures.
The proposed 110% height limitation is in the proposed LDR
amendment that has gone to the Planning and Zoning Commission.
In response to Commissioner Macht's concern, Community
Development Director Bob Keating advised that all regulations do
include TV transmitting towers. He also wished to emphasize that
during the 6 -month period of the moratorium, staff would be
diligently working on this proposed ordinance. While they have
already done a lot of work, there is still quite a bit more to be
accomplished. He specified that the Workshop will be held November
13, 1996, at 1:30 p.m. He advised there would be more meetings
forthcoming concerning co -location, RF engineering, stealthing,
set -backs, buffers, and other issues which need to be addressed in
depth. He emphasized that the 6 -month moratorium was not before
them just to stop towers from being built. There is still a great
deal of work to be done, as well as required procedures, such as
advertising, meeting notices, and so forth.
58
November 5, 1996
M
Commissioner Macht presumed that categories of towers could be
dropped out independent of the whole moratorium as the resolution
is made, and County Attorney Vitunac agreed we could proceed if
Director Keating decided regulations are not required on a certain
subject and if it does not affect the tower application. He
believed we are required, under that case law, to proceed in good
faith.
County Attorney Vitunac advised that staff has been in
communication with all the tower providers who have read about this
ordinance, by faxing them ordinances and keeping them abreast of
what was being done to educate ourselves. The FCC attorney in
charge of the United States tower issue has volunteered to come to
explain the FCC position if the County provides air fare and a
hotel.
County Attorney Vitunac had also been in contact with people
in Atlanta who had a similar arrangement. They had suggested to
him that as long as the County works closely with the industry,
shows good faith, and establishes reasonable regulations, that the
Federal government would not be in opposition. He advised that the
Atlanta people, who were Regional Planning Council members, decided
not to adopt the ordinance after meeting with the industry
representatives in that region. Instead, they set up a study group
which fashioned the regulations now in place. While he has copies
of those, he did not think they fit our area and thought it best to
proceed with the ordinance. The regulations he mentioned would be
a useful resource during the study. If the Board wished to have
the FCC attorney appear before them, he suggested a motion to fund
his travel expense.
A brief discussion ensued about the pros and cons of bringing
the FCC attorney in from Washington and, if so, to which meeting.
Commissioner Bird expressed an aversion to the term
"moratorium" and felt it should be used cautiously and sparingly.
He wondered if it was really necessary in this particular issue,
and if staff might continue to accept applications during the 6 -
month period and not act upon them.
County Attorney Vitunac cautioned that accepting the
applications could create problems in giving them vested rights, if
a complete application was made under existing law. It would be
possible, however, to decide that an application would be accepted
subject to no final approval until the review by Planning & Zoning.
Then, if the review requires additional information, the applicant
would not have acquired vested rights under the old ordinance.
59 BOOK 99 PAGE 576
November 5, 1996
Fr- -I
BOOK 99 PAGE 577
Director Keating envisioned a lot of changes. He mentioned
that the pending application has 5 users, which is probably what
the Board would prefer to avoid the proliferation of towers,
something the present ordinance does not discourage. For these
reasons, he felt they should adopt the moratorium ordinance.
Commissioner Bird pointed out that these applications are not
coming from new companies, but from current providers who are
trying to fill in gaps that exist for cell phone customers who are
complaining about service.
Commissioner Eggert pointed out that three different companies
were trying to fill that need by building three different towers,
whereas through cooperation there might be a better approach.
Commissioner Bird agreed.
Chairman Adams spoke of the distress of residents having to
look at all these towers. She felt there was a responsibility not
to crush quality of life in the quest to provide good cell phone
coverage. She deemed it unfortunate that the prior applications
approved were not subject to co -location and wished that they had
considered this moratorium back in January.
The Chairman opened the public hearing and asked if anyone
wished to be heard in this matter.
Rachel Scott, external affairs manager for Florida Power &
Light, Treasure Coast area, reported that FP&L has been working
with various cell phone providers to allow them to place antennas
on their utility poles. She asked that an exception be included in
the ordinance that would allow them to continue that practice
during the moratorium. She presented proposed language: "Or to the
replacement or reconfiguration of an existing utility pole for
purposes of accommodating an antenna."
Ms. Scott advised their existing poles are 70-80 feet and
telecommunication antennas require 100-130 feet. Typically, they
replace the existing pole with a pole that will accommodate the
antenna. She advised that FP&L has restricted the height to 130
feet.
Geoffrey Sluggett, Unrue Smith & Associates, W. Palm Beach,
representing Sprint Spectrum, PCS, advised that Sprint is currently
negotiating with FP&L to utilize their technology and be able to
co -locate on existing utility poles or add some additional height
as part of the typical transmission facility. He advised that they
wholeheartedly support the exceptions brought to this meeting and
urged their support.
.e
November 5, 1996
Mr. Sluggett addressed two questions to Director Keating.
Concerning co -location, he asked if there is an existing
communications tower, would it still provide for co -location by an
additional user. He also asked about roof -top antennae. Director
Keating nodded in response to both questions.
Mr. Sluggett urged that the moratorium/process be shortened to
3 months or 120 days, because both Sprint and Nextel (another
client) do not have existing networks, are trying to get their
networks in place, and are concerned that the 6 months will delay
them. He felt, from a radio frequency standpoint, that additional
sites will be needed in addition to co -location.
Mr. Sluggett expressed appreciation to the County for working
with the industry, thanked staff for doing an excellent job in that
regard, and gave assurances that he will continue to work with
them.
CLERK'S NOTE: Mr. Sluggett submitted three
photos showing examples of utility poles with
antennae. The photos have been placed on file
in the office of the Clerk to the Board.
Director Keating advised that staff supports using the
existing poles and suggested that the Board might want to put a
height limit on poles if they were in favor of the idea.
Chairman Adams asked what area FP&L is considering, and Ms.
Scott advised that Mr. Sluggett's clients are presently only
looking at the I-95 corridor.
Mr. Sluggett confirmed the I-95 corridor is presently being
considered, especially since Sprint is still designing their
systems, but initially they will determine their highest traffic
areas (calls from vehicles).
Chairman Adams' only concern about exempting existing poles
is that a pole on A1A, for example, might be raised higher.
Commissioner Eggert stated that County Attorney Vitunac had
advised that if the Board agreed to an exception, it could be
restricted to the I-95 corridor.
Chairman Adams requested clarification on exactly where that
would be, the 10 -mile ridge or east of I-95, and Mr. Sluggett
advised that as late as Friday, his client had merely indicated
their initial thrust would be the I-95 corridor.
Chairman Adams was not comfortable in having the exception
without knowing exactly. She predicted staff would work quickly
because the Board was anxious to have the solutions in place. She
61 BOOK 99 pn,E 578
November 5, 1996
BOOK 99 FADE 79
did not think it would take staff the full 6 months to complete
their task.
Mr. Sluggett assured them they would not see 130 foot poles
all over FP&L easements. He felt 130 feet would be the maximum.
He advised that he also represented American Tower Systems and they
build the towers and then sell the space. He advised that Sprint
and Nextel had committed to co -locating on each of those
facilities. The companies do prefer to co -locate where they can.
He felt there would not be a major proliferation of tower
applications, especially during the 6 -month period. He felt that
from a planning perspective, the exception under consideration
might be a good incentive for co -location.
Director Keating clarified that the exception under
discussion, putting antennas on existing structures, would include
utility poles and extending them another 10%.
Chairman Adams was comfortable with using the 10 -mile ridge
area, and County Attorney Vitunac suggested they could limit the
exception to the specific area.
Mr. Sluggett stated he would work with the County and would
further consult with his client in order to provide more input.
Chairman Adams suggested that his client be present at the Workshop
in order to provide input.
Jim Granse, 36 Pine Arbor Lane, concerned citizen, agreed that
a moratorium was necessary to try to keep Indian River County from
looking like a "pin cushion".
Chris Wood, of Houston Quasi Group, representing American
Tower Systems and a number of other companies, wished to go on
record saying that a 90 -day moratorium should be sufficient with
the work that has already gone into formation of a new ordinance.
His clients build towers for co -location of users and intend to be
"good neighbors".
Sharon Brower, 736 34th Terrace, American Radio Relay League
public information officer for Indian River County, appreciated the
consideration given amateur radio operators as an exemption during
the moratorium, and thanked staff for their cooperation.
It was determined that no one else wished to be heard and the
Chairman closed the public hearing.
In response to Commissioner Bird's question about the 6 -month
time frame, Director Keating advised that much would depend on the
Board of County Commissioners as to how long it will take to
address their concerns. He felt that if they could give their
62
November 5, 1996
exact concerns at the November 13th workshop, staff could probably
draft an ordinance to resolve it, and the moratorium might be over
in 90 days. It might take longer if the issues are not narrowed.
Commissioner Tippin philosophized that he has survived 60 -some
years without a cellular phone and he bet he would make it another
6 months.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by
Commissioner Macht, the Board unanimously adopted
Ordinance No. 96-22 declaring a 6 -month moratorium
on the acceptance of applications for wireless
telecommunications towers and on the issuance of
permits and approvals for the construction of
wireless telecommunications towers, with the
addition of allowing antennas on existing structures
up to 110% and the exclusion of the I-95 corridor
(1110 mile ridge" FP&L I-95 easement) up to 130 feet.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Macht, SECONDED by
Commissioner Bird, the Board unanimously approved
funding expenses of the FCC attorney to attend the
Workshop on towers to be held November 13, 1996, if
the Community Development staff deems it necessary.
ORDINANCE NO. 96- 22
AN ORDINANCE OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA,
DECLARING A SIX-MONTH MORATORIUM ON THE
ACCEPTANCE OF APPLICATIONS FOR WIRELESS TELE-
COMMUNICATIONS TOWERS AND ON THE ISSUANCE OF
PERMITS AND APPROVALS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF
WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATIONS TOWERS/ PROVIDING
FOR EXCEPTIONS; SETTING FORTH EXPIRATION AND
EFFECTIVE DATES.
WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 1(f), Article VIII, of the Florida
Constitution and Chapter 125, Florida Statutes, Indian River County is
authorized and required to protect the public health, safety, and welfare and
may exercise any power for a governmental purpose except when expressly
prohibited by law; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to this authority and Section 163.3202, Florida
Statutes, Indian River County has enacted land development regulations
consistent with its adopted Comprehensive Plan which protect the quality of
life in Indian River County; and
WHEREAS, according to recent information provided by the news media, the
number of cellular antennas in the country could grow by more than six times,
from 18,000 to 115;000, by the end of the decade; and
63
November 5, 1996
BOOK 99 pAa580
Boa 99 FacE 581
ORDINANCE NO. 96-22
WHEREAS, good land planning and concern for the quality of life in our
County dictate that such a massive number of tall structures not be placed
haphazardly or allowed in a greater number than need be; and
WHEREAS, the Telecommunications Act of 1996 makes it clear that, as long
as local zoning requirements satisfy certain conditions, the authority of
local governments over the placement, construction_, and modifications of
wireless telecommunications towers ("towers") is neither limited nor
affected; and
WHEREAS, the County has only a limited number of potential sites which
would be acceptable for the installation of towers; and
WHEREAS, the County is cognizant of the need for modern communications
and for effective competition in the field and also desires that the County
residents receive adequate wireless telecommunications services, provided
that the facilities are designed and located to minimize safety and aesthetic
concerns; and
WHEREAS, information received from the industry and from other
governmental agencies that have studied current technology establishes that
towers can be designed and installed in ways that will minimize safety and
aesthetic concerns; and
WHEREAS, these design and installation methods are not yet reflected in
our ordinances; and
WHEREAS, processing applications for towers at the present time, without
the information to determine the need for or the best locations for such
towers, and without time to design such towers to allow for co -location or
nearby siting of additional facilities, may result in the inability to allow
adequate sites for competing providers, and in beneficial services not being
provided; and
WHEREAS, the County planning staff requires a reasonable time period to
research and learn about the technical aspects of the telecommunications
industry as they impact land use decisions so that the County Commission can
properly plan for and implement an efficient and cost-effective wireless
communications services network that meets national local goals and
legislative mandates; and
WHEREAS, in view of the foregoing and the anticipated proliferation of
towers in the immediate future as evidenced by recent applications, a
situation exists which requires an immediate moratorium on commercial radio
towers; and
WHEREAS, this moratorium will be of temporary impact to real properties
within the unincorporated area of the county; and
WHEREAS, this moratorium is being enacted in good faith, without unjust
discrimination, in reliance upon the decision of Sprint Spectrum, L.P. v.
City of Medina, 924 F. Supp. 1036 (W.D. Wash. 1966) and is of the minimum
feasible duration;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that:
SECTION 1. PROHIBITION
Except as otherwise provided herein no application for tower permits
shall be accepted and no Special Exception Permits or other permits shall be
issued for commencement of towers for six months from the effective date of
this ordinance or until the adoption of new and/or amended land development
regulations applicable thereto, whichever shall first occur.
64
November 5, 1996
ORDINANCE NO. 96-22
SECTION 2. EXCEPTIONS
The prohibition set forth in Section 1 hereof shall not apply to:
A. Any complete application for a tower which was on file on the effective
date of this ordinance and which is subsequently determined by the
County Commission to meet all applicable requirements of the Land
Development Code;
B. Any tower which is determined by the County Commission to' be necessary
to any governmental utilities or emergency communications system;
C. Any existing tower replacement or repair;
D. Amateur radio antennas and towers;
E. Adding an antenna to an existing structure so that the height of the
original structure is not increased by more than 10%; or
F. The replacement or reconfiguration of an existing utility pole only
within the ten -mile ridge FPL easement for purposes of accommodating an
antenna, provided that the height shall not exceed,130-€eet=.;•
SECTION 3. CONFLICTION
All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict herewith are hereby
temporarily repealed to the extent of such conflict.
SECTION 4. SEVERABILITY
If any section, sentence, clause, or phrase of this ordinance is held to
be invalid or unconstitutional by any court of competent jurisdiction, then
said holding shall in no way affect the validity of the remaining portions of
this ordinance.
SECTION S. EFFECTIVE DATE
This ordinance shall take effect upon filing with the Florida Secretary
of State.
The ordinance was moved for adoption by Commissioner Eggert , and
the motion was seconded by Commissioner Macht , and, upon being put to
a vote, the vote was as follows:
Chairman Fran B. Adams Aye
Vice Chairman Carolyn K. Eggert Aye
Commissioner Richard N. Bird Aye
Commissioner Kenneth R. Macht Aye
Commissioner John W. Tippin Aye
The Chairman thereupon declared the ordinance duly passed and adopted
this 5 day of November , 1996.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
Attest:
�
By CSO
Fran B. Adams
Jeffre Barton, / Chairman c "A190
141-1
r�
ACKNOWLEDGMENT by the Department of State of the State of Florida, this
day ofOVe:tApLP, , 1996.
65
November 5, 1996
BOOK 99 PAGE 8
BOOK . 99 PA,E 583
PUBLIC HEARING - PAVING & DRAINAGE UNIPROVEMENTS TO 6TH
LANE, 40th AVENUE SW (S. OF 5th STREET SW) AND DEUCE COURT
IN WEST SIDE SUBDIVISION - RESOLUTION III (CONFIlZM Q
PRESS -JOURNAL
Published Daily
Vero Beach, Indian River County, Florida
COUNTY OF INDIAN RIVER: STATE OF FLORIDA
Befcre the undersigned authority personally appeared Darryl K. Hicks who on
Path says that he is President of the Press,Joumal, a daily newspaper published at Vero Beach
in Indian River County, Florida; that the attached copy of advertisement, being
a.�! f
In the matter of
in the
lished in said newspaper in the issues of rJ "' ' 1)3, / � "74
Court, was pub-
Affiant further, says that the said Press -Journal is a newspaper published at Vero Beach, In
said Indian River County, Florida, and that the said newspaper has heretofore been
continuously published in said Indian River County, Florida, each daily and has. been entered as
second class mall matter at the post office in Vero Beach, in said Indian River County, Florida,
for a period of one year next preceding the first publication of the attached copy of
advertisement; and affiant further says that he has neither paid nor promised any, person, firm
or corporation any discount, rebate, commission or refund for the purpose of securing this
advertisement for publication in said newspaper.
'tiC em -'1 subscribed before me this.— d"
of.Licill JA•D. 19 Jk
L
My Comm Expires(President)
A. PRESCOTT. NOTARY PUBLIC,
(President)
Augusl 25, 1997 State of F'ionda. Ny Commission Exp. August 25. 199
No. CC310645
(SEAL)
o`
qrR 0 F FU �`'`.- 5,�ed.
a :.,rare• SA,NT'R?. A. PRESCOTT
66
November 5, 1996
PUBLIC mom --
PAVING & DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS TO 8TN
LME. 40TH AVENUE SW OF STN
STREET SWIESOLlJT10N AND DEUE CE LOCATED N
T R
NO. 96-128
RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF
COUNTY COMMISSIONERS RIVER COUNTY, RAMA, � INDIAN
FOR CERTAIN PAVING AND DRAINAGE
IMPROVEMENTS TO 8TH LME 40TH
AVENUE SW_ _(SOUTFI OF STH STREET
AND DSJGE COURT LOCATED N
WEST SIDE SUBDIVISION. PROVD.
NO THE TOTAL ESTIMATED COST,
NET" OF PAYMENT OF ASSESS
MENTS. NUMBER OF ANNUAL INSTALL
-
M OM AND LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF
THE AREA SPECIFICALLY BENEFITED.
hu been ;q on�ad for Row and
kPwamt for ft Lam 401h AVOW SIN
S1hd SW) aW Deuce Cart bwo in Ww
WHHIFJI3, the ooraaapuCt d psvtng and drain
s awt'Be Chap r 206. Sec 206 O1xgthrougA
20809. tdbn MW Canty code; ane opal esti
o17o1m1e911 Wandpypreekrkwy asaeesrnerN rob have been
ft
tatie
Dotal esrid ao prop ae oevt d W d
end SIXTEEN CENTS (576.389.18k and
., WHEREAS. Urs special assaastrnernt prw w her-
eutder and, for arty record owner 0,
p►apertr
vim ft ares berofttad. bs ,, an prop"
OMW of 0t aoat of ft ��� 3pe�role)e))
fatldr the "11! d parcels ori by ft given
Owner beers tb theI rrarniter d paroeb witNn
She areae Specially be 0a& Assaurnsnb are to
to levied. against d kds and lands adjoining and
� dxdm
with w
WFBEsped� �J�►Sy. le ape SW become
Tax Calladw
of Won Rha j* ►+" t the Offloe (" a" aft me
linel ds4arrdrnallorI d the spsw assessment purser
wtto Sedlat 288-18. kdlen PAW CmmlyRd
Code
WH OWA% any special assessimt not pad
wift bepond�f die darftty rk arta mbasMsheci tri the
I - P o ft Nmol asnsssirnerrt midosidim roll, avid SW of
I*
pay"n twein (1W ddw fig
and
=stlonpW
ard
Cie natu aro
era Baan- ofdeter-
pvpo
crerrso�s
did
rxeMs � aro special nelk Dow
npsraaren kn-
lowit
YYed Side PS 93. Lots 14,
SNorth % Lai S. Souls W Lot 5, and Lots
Abp indbrn River Forma CarPOW "C4131F2
cion PBS 2-28 Wed 79S FT d 9oufh 43
'FT of NoM 737 FT of Wast 30.39 Acres of
p1rrapo�tg11
12, Less West 100 FT (OR Book 477
NOW THEA6-0kE. BE IT RESOLVED BY THE
� COMMISSIONERS OF IN -
1. The AoraP faetbb arsp�afli , and ra'IN, In
to glans 40Th Aversrs SWad Wc d
Sbed SW) and Dsuoe caw kax0ed M West
Side Snitddebn; awou re dealpnetsd as PuI*
Works Project No. 9521 b hereby approveldsus�ject
gWramia o Chapter 209, d m iidbn Rher
C Ths * resoWecn was ol[aeslow d Commie
was aeo�or 'P ' by COmmbsbnar�T�QYI and, upon
M FranV Cul B � was as followA
ChohwW
Aye
W
CM ... 11118101101 ii;;Z Gore en Ikwoodn�R.Maoht ApTee
Ths Chaimferarpm dedamd the rest ye
Attest
♦Jx Barton
JUTREY K BARTON, CLERK
WA Bandl D.C.
23.1990 1345284
PRESS -JOURNAL
Published Daily
Vero Beach, Indian River County, Florida
COUNTY OF INDIAN RIVER: STATE OF FLORIDA
Before the undersigned authority personally appeared Darryl K. Hicks who on
oath says that he is President of the Press -Journal, a daily newspaper published at Vero Beach
in Indian River County, Florida; that the attached copy of advertisement, being
a�)'C Q
in the matter of
in the Court, was pub-
lished in said newspaper in the issues ofr(_'/ ").3 a 9
Affiant further says that the said Press -Journal is a newspaper published at Vero Beach, in
said Indian River County, Florida, and that the said newspaper has heretofore been
continuously published in said Indian River County, Florida, each daily and has been entered as
second class mail matter at the post office in Vero Beach, in said Indian River County, Florida,
for a period of one year next preceding the first publication of the attached copy of
advertisement; and affiant further says that he has neither paid nor promised any person, firm
or corporation any discount, rebate, commission or refund for the purpose of securing this
advertisement for publication in said newspaper.
N,�h,M,i •/.NM
My Comm. Expires
August 25,1957
No. CC310846
trr• JSEAL) c�
. EOF ft'•�yrwuwQN,•
before me this_ day of �cez A.D.
W__ �
sAaaRA A. PRESCoTI'. VOTARY PL•Buc, U ,• ' �w�, ",
State of Florida. My CommissionEap. August 25. 1997
Commrssion . um r. C 10845
Signed- ZAO'_�l
otarv: SA.NDRA A. PRESCOTT
67
November 5, 1996
PAVING d M04AGE IMPROVEMENTS TO 87H
LADE. 40TH AVENUE SWSOUTH OF 5TH
STREET SM AND DEUCE COURT LOCATED N
A RESOLUTION OF INDIAN RIVER COON.
TY, FLORIDA. SETTING A TIME AND
PLACE AT W CCH THE OWNERS OF
PROPERTY ON 8TH LADE. 40TH AVENUE SW MOUTH OF STH STREET •
AND DEUCE COURT N WEST SIDE SLO
DIVISION AND OTHER INTERESTED PER-
SONS BOARD OF CO APPEAR BEFORE THE
AND BE HEARD As TO THE PROPRIETY
AND ADVSOIBILITY OF MAIQNO PAVING
AND DRAINAGE EMEmTo
SAID PROPERTY AS T� 0THE� COST
THEREOF, AS TO THE MANNER OF PAY-
MENT THEREFOR, AND AS TO THE
AMOUNT THEREOF TO BE SPECIALLY
ASSESSED AGAINST EACH PROPERTY
BENEFITED THEREBY.
WHEREAS, the Board of Canty commoners
of Indian River Counly has. by Resoludon No. 98•
129, determined that it is necessary for the pAft
welfare of Ithec01 of the omx . and Particularly
as to ftse within the am
and
tr&drage I n mvaments�' to said00 �p of erty
YEAS, the Board cf C jTj Com baloners
has caused an assaswner,t roll to be om>pmted and
fled with the Clerk to the Bond; and
WHEREAS. Secdon 209.09, indim River County
Code. ► q*W that the Beed M County Commis-
sb a anal fix a tone and place at which the own.
eprrlsooff the propertbs to be assessed or any other
Board of Costly Commissiinterested dook oners and be hid as to
the propriety and advisability of making paving and
bsaid menner p�ayrrientffi" "ato uto,
and as to pprrotahppeeerrttaymohmt thereof W be assessed
against eachDIOW TFiFREFORE BE IT RESbei is OLVED BY THE
BOARD OP COUNTY COMMISSIONERS of IN-
DIAN RIVER Ft.ORC)A ere flows:
1. The con.nmsion ehhel meet a< the Canty
Co ,ft"ion In the Comity Adm Tuesday,
HB i at the hour of 9A5 A.M. on Threaday.
5. 1999. at which time the owners of the
prapertes to be assessed and any otrer interested
persona may appear before said Comnasion and
be (heard in regard to said property. The area to be
Improved and theP� to be spedadr bene -
NO are more described upon the as-
sessnrrk plat and Ire assessment rid with regard
to the special assess uric.
2. Al persons Interested in the constnction of said
the Damp NVI S Oo hbe �d efited may assessmervis against
specially benreview
the assessment plat ahOWN the area to be as-
sessed, the assessment roll, the pians and specF
floafts for the cost thereof at the offtt e C an ret e
3. Notts of the time and pBoard MY week day from ie of tis. until5pb cMlhas"
shall
two �� In Me Deparunent a ad ublic Prsse.busr�
Newspaper a week apart The mat Rblcatah ehd
tbhep at 168131 one week prior to the data of the hear.
�We. yehdl�g give the owRiver ner eachyot Rkic
to be
Of sum assessed � which �I�s�Innhedwby
ma9rhg a a,py of such no tce to each of such prop
erty owners at his IBst known address.
The resolution was nhoved for adoption by Com.
nhmsb a EHp" and the ration was aeoorded by
Camehmsiorsr TWIN and, upon being put to a
vole. the vette was as fobws:
Vire
Chairman
Fran
man B. Ader� Aye
chairan.ris91orer Aye
Commissioner Richard KT Ayyee
Carnissbw Kennath R. MachtThe Chairman lhereupon declared the
Aye
reeduUon
1and adoPtad this 15 day of October.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
INDIAN RIM COUNTY. FLORIDA
Ch mar, B. Adams
Attest: (�h
_W.K Barton
Clerk
Barbera Banal , D.C.
Oct. 23.29.1999 1345283
D0 99 ?KU 584
Bou 99 �xQE 585
With the aid of a drawing of the project location, Civil
Engineer Michelle Gentile reviewed a Memorandum of October 24,
1996:
TO: James Chandler
County Administrator
THROUGH: James W. Davis, P.E
Public Works Director V ;
and ! f/
Roger D. Cain, P.E _
County Engineer
FROM: Michelle A. Gentile, C.E.T.
Civil Engineer
SUBJECT: Public Hearing for the Paving & Drainage Improvements to 6th Lane, 40th
Avenue SW (South of 5th Street SW) and Deuce Court located in West Side
Subdivision
DATE: October 24, 1996
DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS
On October 15, 1996, the Board of County Commissioners adopted Resolution No. 96-128
providing for certain paving and drainage improvements to 6th Lane, 40th Avenue SW
(South of 5th Street SW) and Deuce Court located in West Side Subdivision. A petition
was received from the property owners in this subdivision and was signed by owners of 17
of the 17 properties in the benefited area. This represents 100% of the property owners in
the proposed benefited area who are in favor of having this road improved.
On October 15, 1996, the Board of County Commissioners adopted another Resolution No.
96-129 setting the date and time for a Public Hearing to discuss the advisability, cost and
amount of the assessment against each property owner. This hearing is scheduled for
November 5, 1996. This is a private subdivision and after the improvements are made,
Indian River County will take over the maintenance of these roads and drainage easements.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends the Board of County Commissioners move to approve the assessment roll,
and confirming resolution with changes, if any, made after input at the November 5, 1996,
Public Hearing. Revised confirming resolution and assessment roll will be forwarded to
Chairman of the Board for signature. The Assessment Roll and assessment plat are
available for viewing in the Clerk to the Board of County Commissioner's office.
68
November 5, 1996
In response to Chairman Adams' question, Ms. Gentile advised
that the affected residents were 100% in favor of this project.
The Chairman opened the public hearing and asked if anyone
wished to be heard in this matter.
Bill Davis, 4281 6th Lane SW, advised he was in favor of the
project. He stated that because the garbage trucks tear up the
road quickly, he is willing to give part of his yard to allow the
trucks proper turning room.
It was determined that no one else wished to be heard and the
Chairman closed the public hearing. ,t
ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by
Commissioner Bird, the Board unanimously adopted
Resolution No. 96-135 confirming the assessment roll
for certain paving and drainage improvements to 6th
Lane, 40th Avenue (south of 5th Street SW) and Deuce
Court located in West Side Subdivision.
Confirming (Third Reso.) 1/02/96(ENG)RES3.MAG\gfk
RESOLUTION NO. 96-135
A RESOLUTION OF BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, CONFIRMING
THE ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR CERTAIN PAVING AND
DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS TO 6TH LANE, 40TH
AVENUE (SOUTH OF 5TH STREET SW) AND DEUCE
COURT LOCATED IN WEST SIDE SUBDIVISION.
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River
County adopted Resolution No. 96-128, providing for certain
paving and drainage improvements to 6th Lane, 40th Avenue
(South of 5th Street SW) and Deuce Court in West Side
Subdivision; and
WHEREAS, said resolution described the manner in which the
special assessments are to be made and how the special
assessments are to be paid; and
WHEREAS, the resolution was published as required by
Section 206.06, Indian River County Code; and
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River
County passed Resolution No. 96-129, on October 15, 1996,
69
November 5, 1996
BOOK 99 QL 586
BOOK 99 PACE 587.
RESOLUTION NO. 96-135
which set a time and place for a public hearing at which the
owners of the properties to be assessed and other interested
persons would have the chance to be heard as to any and all
complaints as to said project and said special assessments,
and for the Board to act as required by Section 206.07, Indian
River County Code; and
WHEREAS, notice of the time and place of the public
hearing was published in the Vero Beach Press Journal
NewspapQr on October 23, 1996, and October 29, 1996, (twice
one week apart, and the last being at least one week prior to
the hearing), as required by Section 206.06, Indian River
County Code; and
WHEREAS, the land owners of record were mailed notices at
least ten days prior to the hearing, as required by Section
206.06, Indian River County Code; and
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River
County on Tuesday, November 5, 1996 at 9:05 A.M. conducted the
public hearing with regard to the special assessments,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, as follows:
1. The foregoing recitals are affirmed and ratified in their
entirety.
2. The Board finds that the properties assessed by this
resolution will receive special benefits equal to or
greater than the cost of the assessment.
3. The special assessments shown on the attached assessment
roll are hereby confirmed and approved, and shall remain
legal, valid, and binding first liens against the
properties assessed until paid in full.
4. The County will record the special assessments and this
resolution, which describes the properties assessed and
the amounts of the special assessments, on the public
70
November 5, 1996
RESOLUTION NO. 96-135
records, which shall constitute prima facie evidence of
the validity of the special assessments.
The resolution was moved for adoption by Commissioner
_Eggert , and the motion was seconded by Commissioner
Bi rd , and, upon being put to a vote, the vote was as
follows:
Chairman Fran B. Adams Aye
Vice Chairman Carolyn K. Eggert Aye
Commissioner John W. Tippin Aye
Commissioner Richard N. Bird Aye
Commissioner Kenneth R. Macht Aye
The Chairman thereupon declared the resolution duly
passed and adopted this _ �_ day of Novemh .r , 1996.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
By ` Q
At�est�
Jeffr Barton, Clerk
Attachment: ASSESSMENT ROLL
wsconf.res
FRAN B. ADAMS,
Chairman
hkffa WNW C M=y
Awmwd
Dale
Administration
V $12
o
Budget
IA-gal!f
Risk Management
Public Works
This document was prepared by and should be returned to the County Engineer's Office, 1840 25th Street, Vero
Beach, FL 32960
71
November 5, 1996
BOOK 99 PAGE 588
Z
O
3 PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR PAVING AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS
TO: WEST SIDE SUBDIVISION (RACQUET CLUB)
TOTAL PARCELS ............. 17
COST TO PROPERTY OWNERS... $76,389.16
PROJECT NO. 9521 COST PER PARCEL......... $4,493.48
t i NO. OF P.O./COUNTY TOTAL
NAME & ADDRESS LEGAL DESCRIPTION PARCELS COST/PARCEL TOTAL COST AGREEMENT ASSESSMENT COST
1. Arlene Green Bradshaw 22 33 39 00006 0000 00001.0 1.00 $4,493.48 $4,493.48 $965.00 $3,528.48 •
P.O. Box 4080 West Side Subdivision PBI 9-3
Vero Beach, FL 32964-4080 Lot 1 (OR BK 495, PP 494)
_'. James L. & Henri Sue Bynum 22 33 39 00006 0000 00002.0 1.00 $4,493.48 $4,493.48 $965.00 $3,528.48
4261 Deuce Court West Side Subdivision PBI 9-3
Vero Beach, FL 32968 Lot 2
J
�. Herold V. & Margaret O. Mason 22 33 39 00006 0000 00003.0 1.00 $4,493.48 $4,493.48 5965.00 $3,528.48 •
N P.O. Box 154 West Side Subdivision PBI 9-3
Vero Beach, FL 32961-0154 Lot 3
4 Richard L. Prendergast 22 33 39 00006 0000 00004.0 1.00 $4,493.48 $4,493.48 $965.00 $3,528.48 •
35 43rd Avenue West Side Subdivision P819-3
Vero Beach, FL 32968 Let 4
S. Gregory H. & Nancy L. Galley 22 33 39 00006 0000 00005.0 1.00 $4,493.48 $4,493.48 $965.00 $3,528.48 •
4280 Game Street West Side Subdivision PBI 9-3
Vero Beach, FL 32968 South 1/2 of Lot 5 tzJ
6 Edward P. & Teri L. BaranBorg 22 33 39 00006 0000 00005.1 1.00 54,493.48 $4.493.48 $965.00 $3,528.48 • �
555 S%%[ 40th Avenue West Side Subdivision PBI 9-3 y
Vero Beach, FL 32968 North 1/2 of Lot 5 H
O t�
z
z
O
Cc
WI_STSIDE.WK1 " Signed Petition 24 -Oct -96 I �,
N a
W
V1
QD
Cz
J
W
t9
PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR PAVING AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS
TO: WEST SIDE SUBDIVISION (RACQUET CLUB)
WESTSIDE.WK1 " Signed Petition
w
t1j
In
O
r
C:
H
H
O
Z
Z
O
a,
24 -Oct -96 w
to
1
C
1
TOTAL PARCELS .............
17
COST TO PROPERTY OWNERS...
$76,389.16
PROJECT NO. 9521
COST PER PARCEL........,
$1,493.48
I
NO. OF
P.O./COUNTY
'TOTAL
NAME & ADDRESS
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
PARCELS
COST/PARCEL
TOTAL COST
AGREEMENT ASSESSMENT COST
7. Leon G. Taft
22 33 39 00006 0000 00006.0
1.00
$4,493.48
$4,493.48
$965.00
$3,528.48 0
655 40th Avenue SW
West Side Subdivision PBI 9-3
Vero Beach, FL 32968
Lot 6
8. Robert Alan & Pamela Sehlamowitz
22 33 39 00006 0000 00007.0
1.00
$4,493.48
$4,493.48
$965.00
$3,528.48 •
4160 61h Lane SW'
West Side Subdivision PBI 9-3
Vero Beach, FL 32968
Lot 7
Q. John T. & Isabelle B. Dayton
22 33 39 00006 0000 00008.0
1.00
$4,493.48
$4,493.48
$905.00
$3,528.48 •
4220 6th Lane SW
West Side Subdivision PBI 9-3
Vero Beach, FL 32968
Lot 8
IO James B.P.Gibson &
22 33 39 00006 0000 00009.0
1.00
$4,493.48
$4,493.48
$965.00
$3,528.48 •
Susan Baxter
West Side Subdivision PBI 9-3
4230 6ih Lane SW
Lot 9
Vero Beach, FL 32968
I I Nadya Schultz
22 33 39 00006 0000 00010.0
1.00
$4,493.48
$4,493.48
$965.00
$3,528.48 0
4280 Game Street
West Side Subdivision PBI 9-3
Vero Beach, FL 32968
Lot 10
12 Billy Jop & Virginia Mary Davis'
22 33 39 00006 0000 00011.0
1.00
$4,493.48
$4,493.48
$965.00
$3,528.48 •
4281 Game Street
West Side Subdivision PBI 9-3
Vero Beach. FL 32968
Lot 11
WESTSIDE.WK1 " Signed Petition
w
t1j
In
O
r
C:
H
H
O
Z
Z
O
a,
24 -Oct -96 w
to
1
C
1
7
PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR PAVING AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS
TO: WEST SIDE SUBDIVISION (RACQUET CLUB)
TOTAL PARCELS ............. 17
COST TO PROPERTY OWNERS... $76,389.16
COST PER PARCEL......... $4.493.48
P.O./COUNTY 'TOTAL
TOTAL COST AGREEMENT ASSESSMENT COST
PROJECT NO. 9521
NAME & ADDRESS
i NO. OF
LEGAL DESCRIPTION PARCELS COST/PARCEL
WESTSIDE.WK1
17
13
Alfred C. Westerman
22 33 39 00006 0000 00012.0
1.00
$4,493.48
$4,493.48
$965.00
$3,528.48 4
AssEs MEXT
Ci
P.O. Box 3015
West Side Subdivision FBI 9-3
•H
O
z
Vero Beach, FL 32964-3015
Lot 12
O
t�
0
0
14
Ernest L.& Margie L. Caplinger
22 33 39 00006 0000 00013.0
1.00
$4,493.48
$4,493.48
$965.00
$3,528.48 •
r.,
4221 6th Lane SW
West Side Subdivision PBI 9-3
Vero Beach, FL -32968
Lot 13
J
'p 15.
Samuel T. & Elaine Schlamowitz
22 33 39 00006 0000 00014.0
1.00
$4.493.48
$4,493.48
$965.00
$3,528.48 •
4211 61h Lane SW
Weal Side Subdivision PBI 9-3
Vero Beach, FL 32968
Lot 14
16.
Earl T.& Theresa H. Spytck
22 33 39 00006 0000 00015.0
1.00
$4.493.48
$4,493.48
5965.00
$3.528.48 •
P.O. Box 2558
Weal Side Subdivision PBI 9-3
Vero Beach, FL 32961-2558
Lot IS
17.
Roberto C. Loon
Indian River Farms Company
1.00
$4,493.48
$4,493.48
$955.00
$3,528.45 •
21 Blackwood Lane
Subdivision PBS 2-25 West 795
Stamford, CT 06908
FT of South 432 FT of North
737 FT of West 30.38 Acres
of Tract 12, Less West 100 FT
(OR BK 477 PP 95)
WESTSIDE.WK1
17
$4,493.48
$76,389.16
$16,405.00
$59,984.16
TDTAL PARCELS
COST PPR PARCEL
TOTAL CWT
ADROMENTTDTAL
FUNDIS
AssEs MEXT
Signed Petition
w
tel
to
O
r
Ci
H
•H
O
z
O
t�
0
0
dl
I
CM
Lin W
cc
24 -Oct -96
a
r.,
HEARING DATES FOR LDR AMENDMENTS (NOT RELATED TO
TOWERS)
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of October 30, 1966:
TO: James E. Chandler
County Administrator
DI ION HEAD CONCURRENCE:
Rober M. Keating, ICPZector
Community De��v11�e►►lopm nt D
FROM: Stan Boling,�AICP
Planning Director
DATE: October 30, 1996
SUBJECT: Approval of Hearing Dates for Two Board Hearings to
Consider LDR Amendments Not Related to Communication
Towers
It is requested that the data herein presented be given formal
consideration by the Board of County Commissioners at its regular
meeting of November 5, 1996.
BACKGROUND:
Until the 1995 state legislative session, all land development
regulation (LDR) amendments required two evening hearings of the
Board of County Commissioners. However, 1995 legislation allows
some flexibility in meeting times, although two hearings are still
required for one of the types of amendments being proposed. To
minimize the number of required hearings, staff limits the number
of times the LDRs are amended. This has been done by holding
proposed LDR amendments until a sufficient number of amendments
exists to process and consider at one time.
Presently, staff is holding -off on scheduling Board consideration
of LDR amendments relating to communication towers, since the Board
is scheduled to workshop tower issues separately. However, there
are several proposed LDR amendments not related to communication
towers which now require consideration and action by the Board of
County Commissioners. These proposed amendments have been
collected by staff over the last several months and have been
initiated by staff, the Board of County Commissioners, and a
private party. This set of LDR amendments relates to several
issues, including the following:
1. Modifications to extend land development permit and
preliminary plat approval timeframes.
2. Restatement of special setbacks for utility sheds.
3. Minor revisions/update of handicap parking requirements.
4. Clarification of concurrency criterion for accessory dwelling
units.
5. Referencing "fueling position" rather than "pump" regarding
the traffic impact fee category for gasoline sales.
75
November 5, 1996
5ooK 99 PAGE592
BOOK 99 PAU 593
6. Allowing car washes in the CL (Limited Commercial) zoning
district as a permitted use. _
7. Codification of the adopted Wabasso Corridor Plan development
requirements.
The Planning and Zoning Commission (PZC) and the Professional
Services Advisory Committee (PSAC) have reviewed and made
recommendations on all the proposed amendments. To proceed with
the review and approval process for the amendments, the Board must
now set dates and times for the required public hearings.
ANALYSIS AND ALTERNATIVES:
Planning staff has coordinated closely with the county attorney's
office concerning the newer state requirements for LDR amendment
hearings. The new legislation divides LDR amendments into two
types: _
1. Amendments which change the actual list of permitted,
conditional, or prohibited uses within a zoning category
(district); and
2. All other types of amendments.
One of the proposed amendments would change the zoning districts in
which car washes are allowed. Therefore, that amendment requires
two hearings. Florida statutes provides that one of those two
hearings can be held after 5:00 p.m., but that both hearings could
be held before 5:00 p.m. (e.g. regular Board meeting times) if that
option is approved by a majority plus 1 vote of the Board. Thus
with 4 or 5 positive votes, the Board could vote to hold both LDR
hearings before 5:00 p.m., such as at a regular Tuesday morning
Board meeting. All of the other amendments are required by the new
legislation to be considered at only one hearing, which could be
held before 5:00 p.m.
Two hearings will be required to be held in regard to the proposed
car wash amendment. In addition, staff notes that the Board may
desire some changes to the other proposed amendments. To
accommodate the legal requirements of the car wash proposal and to
accommodate any changes the Board may feel are needed for any of
the other amendments, it is staff's opinion that all of the LDR
amendments should be considered at two hearings. It is also
staff's opinion that the first hearing should be held after 5:00
P.M. to accommgdate discussion and input from members of the public
for whom the 5:01 meeting time is more convenient. The second
hearing, which is generally shorter and more of a "wrap-up"
meeting, could be held during a regular Tuesday morning Board
meeting.
One set of hearing dates which would comply with state hearing and
advertizing requirements, would allow for two hearings for all
proposed amendments, and appears to accommodate the Thanksgiving
Holiday and Commissioners schedules, is as follows:
Hearing Date Time
1. Special meeting Wednesday, December 4, 1996 5:01 P.M.
2. Regular meeting Tuesday, December 17, 1996 9:05 a.m.
Staff has tentatively reserved use of the Commission Chambers for
these proposed dates. The Board may establish any other dates that
meet state requirements and during which the Chambers may be used.
76
November 5, 1996
M M M
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the Board establish meeting dates for two
public hearings to consider and adopt the proposed LDR amendments.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by
Commissioner Bird, the Board unanimously scheduled
the LDR hearing dates/times for Wednesday, December
4, 1996, at 5:01 p.m. and Tuesday, December 17,
1996, at 9:05 a.m., as recommended in the
Memorandum.
77 800K �� PAGE 594
November 5, 1996
BOOK 99 PAGE 595
ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE REGULATIONS DISCUSSION
Planning Director Stan Boling reviewed a Memorandum of October
30, 1996:
TO: James E. Chandler
County Administrator
D ION HEAD CONCURRENCE:
A
Robert M. Kea i , A
Community Developmen irector
FROM: Stan Boling, AICP
Planning Director
DATE: October 30, 1996
SUBJECT: Request for Board Direction on County Alcoholic Beverage
Regulations
It is requested that the data herein presented be given formal
consideration by the Board of County Commissioners at its regular
meeting of November 5, 1996.
BACKGROUND:
At its October 1, 1996, meeting the Board of County Commissioners
considered different requests from the Sheriff's Office and Lori
Fothergill (owner of "The Ultimate Pizza" restaurant) to revisit
the county's current alcoholic beverage regulations (see attachment
#1). At that meeting, the Board voted 4-0 to direct the County
Attorney's Office and planning staff to coordinate with Ms.
Fothergill, the Sheriff's Office, and other interested parties
(e.g. church and school district representatives) on possible
changes to the county's alcoholic beverage regulations.
On October 11, 1996, planning staff and the county attorney held a
discussion and input meeting attended by persons from: the
Sheriff's Office, the School District, The Ultimate Pizza, and five
local churches (see attachment #2). At the meeting, staff handed -
out a background summary and alternatives for discussion (see
attachment #3). Discussion focused on whether or not changes
should be made to the county's current 500' and 1,000' separation
distances between churches and schools and places where alcoholic
beverages are sold and consumed (respectively). Discussion lasted
for about 11 hours.
ANALYSIS:
At the October 11th meeting, planning staff asked if some
alternative standards, such as hours of operation, could be used
instead of separation distances and still adequately address
concerns about use incompatibilities. A summary of some of the
concerns and opinions expressed at the meeting are is follows:
•Sheriff's Office: Bars in various areas, particularly Gifford,
cannot meet current separation distances and will need to be
closed -down if regulation changes are not made. Closing down the
bars will lead to drinking and congregating in the streets, empty
lots, and houses. Regulation changes that will legalize existing
78
November 5, 1996
bars will allow for control and further regulation of such places
(such as regulating hours of operation).
*Ultimate Pizza: Restaurants where beer and wine are consumed on
site should be treated less stringently than bars. Churches are
allowed to locate in commercial districts and thereby restrict
future retail or restaurant uses involving alcoholic beverages that
otherwise would be allowed. There is no inherent incompatibility
between churches and restaurants that serve beer and wine since, at
a previous location in a commercial district in the county, The
Ultimate Pizza was located next to a church (Immanuel Baptist) for
some time, without incompatibility problems.
•Various Church Representatives: Stated that relaxing distance
regulations will not increase control but will lead to more
problems, including bad influences on minors and potential safety
problems involving patrons under the influence of alcohol. Also,
treating restaurants more leniently could create a -loophole for
defacto bars that provide food and operate under the guise of a
"restaurant". Establishments selling and serving alcoholic
beverages could proliferate around churches that are in or near
commercial zoning districts if separation distances are decreased.
One church representative stated that making a distinctivon between
bars and restaurants could be acceptable..-
At the end of the meeting, staff concluded that there appeared to
be significant opposition to decreasing the current separation
distance standards in return for any alternative st d
distinction between restauraz
would report these matters
direction on whether or not
regulations. Persons present
their names and addresses if
about staff's report back to
list, staff has contacted t
regarding the Board's consider
5, 1996 meeting.
an and or
is and bars. Staff stated that it
:o the Board and seek the Board's
to pursue changes to the existing
at the meeting were asked to provide
they wanted staff to contact them
the Board. Based on the resulting
hese and other interested parties
.ation of this issue at its November
After the October 11th discussion/input meeting, the Sheriff
informed planning staff that the Sheriff's Office is no longer
pursuing regulation changes due to a lack of community support ( see
attachment #4). Separate from the Sheriff's Office request, Ms.
Fothergill still wants the Board to consider regulation changes
that would establish more lenient standards for restaurants (as
opposed to bars) or that would eliminate separation distance
requirements involving churches located in commercial zoning
districts.
At this time, the Board has a few basic alternatives:
1. Direct staff to drop consideration of any regulation change.
2. Direct staff to initiate regulation changes to establish a
reduced separation distance requirement (such as 5001) for
restaurants where beer and..wine are consumed.
3. Direct staff to eliminate separation distance requirements
involving churches located within commercial zoning districts.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the Board
staff to either initiate specific
alcoholic beverage regulations
changes to the regulations.
of County Commissioners direct
changes to the county's existing
or to drop consideration of any
79
November 5, 1996 eoa 99 PAGE 596
r I
BOOK 99 PAGE 597
Director Boling and Community Development Director Bob Keating
responded to numerous questions of the Commissioners concerning
current locations of bars in proximity to schools and churches.
Chairman Adams saw two different situations: a bar that serves
alcoholic beverages and a restaurant which serves beer and wine
with food. She thinks they may need to be addressed differently.
The following clergy and others spoke against any modification
of the current alcoholic beverage ordinance for various reasons
including the consequences of use of alcoholic beverages by young
people; effects of alcoholic abuse; dangers to the moral standards
of Indian River County; there are enough existing places in the
county that sell alcoholic beverages; and that the ordinance was in
place when The Ultimate Pizza moved into their present location.
• Rev. Chris Taylor, Antioch Primitive Baptist Church;
• Rev. Henry Burson, Northside Church of God;
• Rev. Jack Diehl, Our Savior Lutheran Church;
• Rev. Donald Brown, Church of God in Christ;
• Rev. Andrew Jefferson, St. Peter's Missionary Baptist
Church;
• Doris Tropf, president of local Mother's Against Drunk
Driving (MADD);
• Connie Stevens, board member of local MADD;
• Judy Saucerman, 625 11th Place;
• Rev. Joe Brooks, 20th Avenue Church of God;
• Rev. Richard Williams, Glendale Baptist Church;
• Rev. Paul Mace, Forest Park Baptist Church;
Bruce Barkett, attorney representing The Ultimate Pizza and
Lori Fothergill, advised that he was not Ms. Fothergill's attorney
when she moved the restaurant's location. He understood the
concerns expressed by the prior speakers and agreed that the
ordinance should not be changed for one person. He felt that many
of the concerns and reasons mentioned by the opponents had nothing
'to do with serving beer or wine at a restaurant, but that is the
issue. He believed the issue should be decided based on logic and
reason, valid police power concerns and valid planning concerns,
not emotions.
Attorney Barkett recalled that at a recent public workshop, no
concern was raised on behalf of the school district about reducing
the distances between a restaurant serving alcoholic beverages and
the schools. He believed that could be confirmed by Mr. Smith who
80
November 5, 1996
had attended the workshop and was presently in the audience. He
noted that five of the speakers today were from the Baptist
denomination; however, the Board is not authorized and should not
regulate on the basis of protecting -one denomination over another.
He recalled that at the workshop other denominations'
representatives were not concerned about reducing the separation
distance.
Attorney Barkett summed up that Ms. Fothergill owns a
restaurant and wants to serve beer and wine and not one instance
had been mentioned today of a situation of this type of
establishment creating a conflict with a church or with a school or
with the community. The impact of a restaurant on a community is
much different than the impact of a bar or a lounge and that is
what has to be considered. Ms. Fothergill's restaurant is located
in a commercial district which should have commercial enterprises
such as restaurants. He pointed out that restaurants pay taxes and
taxes help this community. He stated that no valid planning,
zoning, or police power concerns were brought up as to why a
restaurant in a commercial zoning district should, pot be, allowed
within 500 feet of a church. In spite of all the emotion, 'he
believed that is where the Board should focus.
Greg Smith, executive director of facilities for Indian River
County School District, wished to clarify his statements from the
October 11th meeting referred to by Mr. Barkett. He advised that
at the school district they did not want the school children to see
the consumption of alcohol, the advertisements associated with bars
or restaurants that serve alcohol, nor did they want anyone who has
consumed alcohol (wherever it might have been consumed) to stumble
across a school campus. He added that he was attempting to support
the Sheriff's position at that meeting in their effort to maintain
control in the community.
Commissioner Macht moved to direct staff not to do anything to
reduce the separation any further; motion died for lack of a
second.
Commissioner Eggert thought there was an inconsistency and
would like to see if staff can determine a difference between
"restaurant" and "bar" that will stick.
81
November 5, 1996
903 99 WAGE 598
BOOK 99 F -AGE 599
MOTION WAS MADE by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED BY
Commissioner Bird, to direct staff to prepare an
ordinance which will consistently address county-
wide concerns and recommendations for the Board to
discuss at a workshop to be held in a couple of
weeks.
Commissioner Eggert thought it might be possible for staff to
differentiate between a restaurant and a bar with a difference
between liquor and beer and wine. She wanted consistency
throughout the county and wanted staff to determine if hours of
operation would have any effect.
Under discussion, Commissioner Bird suggested that definitions
should be specific for terms such as "table service" (eliminating
a sit-down bar), "beer and wine only" (eliminating stronger
alcoholic beverages), "food service must be provided at all times
that beer and wine is being sold, 11 and "beer and wine incidental to
the food service".
Chairman Adams requested maps showing the locations of
churches and bars and restaurants that serve alcoholic beverages.
THE CHAIRMAN
carried by a
opposed).
CALLED THE QUESTION and the motion
vote of 4 to 1 (Commissioner Macht
CLERK'S NOTE: Letters received from the following in
opposition to changing the alcoholic beverage ordinance
have been placed on file in the office of the Clerk to
the Board:
Tabernacle Baptist Church
American Family Association
Immanuel Baptist Church
Community Baptist Church
82
November 5, 1996
ANNUAL REPORTS - SHIP PROGRAM
Community Development Director Bob
Keating reviewed a
Memorandum of October 29, 1996 and called attention to the figures
on the chart:
TO: James E. Chandler
County Administrator
DE TMENT HEAD CONCURRENCE:
i
Robert M. Keating, AICP
Community Develol VID-ir—ectc�/-
FROM: Sasan Rohani, AICP "-' • W
Chief, Long -Range Planning
DATE: October 29, 1996
SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY SHIP PROGRAM ANNUAL
REPORTS
It is requested that the data herein presented be given formal consideration by the Board of County
Commissioners at their regular meeting of November 5, 1996.
On April 6, 1993, the Board of County Commissioners adopted the Indian River County Local
Housing Assistance Plan (Ordinance #93-13). By adopting the plan and subsequently receiving
Florida Housing Finance Agency approval of the plan, Indian River County became eligible to
receive State Housing Initiatives Partnership (SHIP) Program funds.
The purpose of the SHIP program is to provide affordable housing for qualifying households. As
structured, the county's SHIP Program provides low interest, deferred payment, subordinated loans
to very low income, low income, and eligible moderate income households. Most of these loans
provide downpayment and closing cost assistance, with local financial institutions providing
principal mortgages.
Since the plan was approved, the county received a $250,000.00 per year SHIP fund allocation for
FY 92/93, FY 93/94, and FY 94/95. The county also received $565,773 for FY 1995-96.
The following table indicates the fiscal year allocations and number of loans given to the applicants
by fiscal year and by income category.
83
November 5, 1996
"OK 99 'AGE RJO
BOOK 99 PAGE 691
SHIP PROGRAM REPORT
[3-94
AMOUNT OF SHIP
FUNDING
# OF LOANS
PROVED
AND % OF LOANS APPROVED BY INCONM
ATEGORY
*
%
%
%
250,000.00
1
13
1.71
17
1.66
11
.83
250,000.00
12
43
18
.65
18.92
95
S 250,000.00
11
.67
13
0.33
20.00
-96 year to
date
S 565,773.00
1
.84
.89
5.26
OTAL
1,315,773.00 1165
34.54
1
.09
16.36
AM V; vcwver 16y, I YY0
* Very Low Income (VLI)
* * Low Income (LI)
* * * Moderate Income (MI)
As per the requirements of the SHIP Program, the county must submit an annual report for each
fiscal year for which SHIP funds have been used. These reports must be signed by the Chairman
of the Board of County Commissioners or her designee. The annual SHIP reports for FY 92-93,
FY 93-94, and FY 94-95 were submitted to the state last year, however, only the annual report for
FY 1992-93 was considered to be a close-out report that does not need to be re -submitted. Attached
to this staff report are the county's SHIP Program FY 1993-94, FY 1994-95, and FY 1995-96 annual
reports. These reports must be submitted to the state by November 15, 1996.
According to state regulations, SHIP funds must be utilized in such a manner that all state
requirements and all requirements of the county's Local Housing Assistance Program are met.
Among the State Housing Initiatives Partnership Program (SHIP) requirements are the following:
• At least 30% of recipients must be very low income (VLI)
• At least 30% of recipients must be low income (LI)
• At least 65% of funds must be utilized for homeownership
• At least 75% of funds must be utilized for construction, rehabilitation and emergency repair
• Not more than 10% of funds can be utilized for administration costs
In administering the SHIP program, the county has met all of these requirements as well as local
requirements for homeownership, credit, employment, and assets.
The purpose of this agenda item is to request that the Board of County Commissioners review the
attached Annual SHIP reports and authorize the Chairman to sign these reports.
84
November 5, 1996
0
The Board of County Commissioners has two alternatives with respect to the SHIP Annual Report.
These are:
■ To approve the attached Annual Reports and direct staff to submit the reports to the Florida -
Housing Finance Agency.
■ Not to approve the attached Annual Reports. Choosing the second alternative, however,
would cause the county to become ineligible to receive additional SHIP funds. Staff
supports the first alternative.
Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners approve the attached Annual SHIP
reports and authorize the Chairman to sign these reports.
Commissioner Bird wanted assurances that people who need help
are getting the word that this program is available and
Commissioner Eggert assured him that, judging by the numbers who
were waiting in line to make applications, people are aware of it.
Commissioner Macht thought bank loan officers brief people who
apply for home loans of this possibility also.
Commissioner Bird paid tribute to Commissioner Eggert and
staff for their efforts in this program.
MOTION WAS MADE by Commissioner Bird, SECONDED BY
Commissioner Eggert, to approve staff's
recommendation as set forth in the memorandum.
Commissioner Eggert expressed her thanks to Director Keating
and Charles Lavan of Indian River National Bank• for their fine
work on the Loan Review Committee.
Chairman Adams concurred they do a great job and thanked them
for their efforts.
THE CHAIRMAN CALLED THE QUESTION and the motion
carried unanimously.
COPY OF ANNUAL REPORTS ON FILE IN THE OFFICE
OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
85
November 5, 1996
BOOK 9� taLE bJ
Q
BOOK 99 PAr. GE 603
HOBART TOWER SPACE LEASE - SEXTON GROVE SERVICES
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of October 16, 1996:
TO: Honorable Board of County Co issioners
THROUGH: Doug Wright, Director
Department of Emergency Lrvices
FROM: John King, Emergency Management Coordinator '--/-,
Division of Emergency Management
DATE: October 16, 1996
SUBJECT: Approval of Sexton Grove Services, Inc., Tower Space
Lease at Hobart Tower
It is respectfully requested that the information contained herein
be given formal consideration by the Board of County Commissioners
at the next regularly scheduled meeting.
DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS:
Sexton Grove Services, Inc., has requested to locate their company
radio system at the County Hobart Tower site. The County has tower
space available and staff is proposing a lease agreement with an
effective date of November 1, 1996.
This agreement provides Sexton Grove Services, Inc., with floor
space adequate for a transmitter/receiver, accessories, and tower
space at 300 feet for their antenna. In accordance with the -
antenna height/fee schedule utilized for all leases, the company
agrees to an annual rental of $1,920 payable at a monthly rate of
$160 due on the first day of each month.
ALTERNATIVES AND ANALYSIS:
The addition of one new tenant should have no significant effect on
the operation of the existing systems within the communications
building. The funds received from non -County agencies are used to
offset recurring and maintenance costs associated with the tower.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends approval of the Tower Space Lease with Sexton
Grove Services, Inc., with an effective date of November 1, 1996,
contingent upon receipt of the required insurance coverages as
provided in the lease.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by
Commissioner Tippin, the Board unanimously approved
the tower space lease with Sexton Grove Services,
Inc., with an effective date of November 1, 1996,
contingent upon receipt of the required insurance
coverage as provided in the lease, as recommended in
the Memorandum.
TOWER SPACE LEASE ON FILE IN THE OFFICE
November 5, 1996
OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
86
BASE GRANT AGREEMENT - EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT
PREPAREDNESS AND ASSISTANCE TRUST FUND CONTRACT
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of October 17, 1996;
TO: Honorable Board of County C mmissioners
THROUGH: Doug Wright, Director
Department of Emergency Services
FROM: John King, Emergency Management Coordinator -211--
Division of Emergency Management
DATE: October 17, 1996
SUBJECT: Approval of Base Grant Agreement from the Emergency
Management, Preparedness and Assistance Trust Fund
Contract Number 97CP-05-10-40-01-031
It is respectfully requested that the information contained herein
be given formal consideration by the Board of County Commissioners
at the next regularly scheduled meeting. _
DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS:
In 1993, the Florida Legislature enacted two significant pieces of
legislation to improve disaster preparedness and response
capabilities throughout Florida. These bills, known as HB 911 and
SB 1858, strengthen emergency management planning requirements at
all levels, provide additional funding for emergency management
programs, and implement numerous additional recommendations of the
Governor's Disaster Planning and Response Review Committee.
Included in this legislation is a funding mechanism created for
local emergency management agencies and other programs in the
Emergency Management, Preparedness and Assistance Trust Fund. The
funding comes from an annual non-refundable surcharge of $2.00 per
every homeowner's, mobile homeowner's, tenant homeowner's, and
condominium unit owner's policy, and an annual $4.00 non-refundable
surcharge imposed on every commercial fire, commercial multiple _
peril, and business owner's property insurance policy, issued or
renewed.
Indian River County has received the above referenced contract
specifying that $110,521 in non-matching funds is available based
on a formula prescribed by law and detailed in Rule Chapter 9G-19,
Florida Administrative Code, and by certification of the County to
employ and maintain a full-time Emergency Management Director.
This year's allocation represents $97,719 provided for FY -96/97,
with a deduction of $5,102 for satellite communications costs per
section 9G-19.005 (3), Florida Administrative Code, and a
carry-over of $17,904 from the previous fiscal year.
Staff proposes to use grant funds for the following purposes:
1. Continued funding of the Emergency Management Planner
position and the addition of an Emergency Management
Planning Assistant detailed in the 001-238 budget
approved by the Board earlier this year.
2. In anticipation of receiving this grant funding, staff
submitted and received approval during the budgeting
process for continuance of the 001-238 account, including
operating and capital expenses.
87
November 5, 1996 9{�
BOOK 9 F'AGE b`J 4
BOOK 99 PAGE 605
3. Use of the balance of -funds from the grant to purchase
capital equipment and supplement funds already identified
for shelter retrofit projects, EOC/Emergency Management
office renovations, and other projects consistent with
the timely completion of the attached Five -Year Strategic
Plan (scope of work.)
No additional funds are needed to qualify for this grant. .It
should be noted that funds received from the Emergency Management,
Preparedness and Assistance Trust Fund may not be used to supplant
existing funds.
ALTERNATIVES AND ANALYSIS:
The Base Grant includes a scope of work that must be completed
during the term of the grant. It is also provides one dedicated
computer, state-owned, to be used for satellite communications
between the State Emergency Operations Center and the --Indian River
County EOC. As previously mentioned and noted in the agreement, a
deduction of $5,102 has already been made by the state for
communications costs per Section 9G-19.005 (3), Florida
Administrative Code.
This recent legislation now included in Chapter 252, Florida
Statutes compels emergency management agencies to comply with the
following:
1. Work with the Department of Education and local school_
board to develop new design criteria to ensure that new
educational facilities can serve as public shelters for
emergency management purposes.
2. Serve as liaison and coordinator of municipalities'
requests for state and federal assistance during post -
disaster emergency operations.
3. Identify and register persons in need of assistance and
plan for resource allocation to meet identified needs.
Disabled persons must be given the option of
preauthorizing emergency personnel to enter their homes
during search and rescue operations necessary to assure
their safety and welfare. Emergency Management agencies
must work with HRS, health care agencies, community-based
service providers, and home health care providers to
inform all their incoming clients of the registry as part
of the intake process.
4. Assist in surveying facilities suitable to serve as
public shelters and post -disaster community service
centers.
5. Continue to review comprehensive emergency management
plans for all intermediate care facilities for the
developmentally disabled, patient care facilities serving
seven or more people, and homes serving individuals who
have complex medical conditions. These plan reviews are
required by law to be coordinated with HRS, Agency for
Health Care Administration, the Department of Community
Affairs, and appropriate volunteer organizations within
60 days of receipt.
Staff understands that should the Base Grant
cease to be available that the Board is under no
the two (2) staff positions from other revenue
88
November 5, 1996
Trust Fund revenue
obligation to fund
sources.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends the Board approve the Emergency Management,
Preparedness and Assistance Trust Fund which continues funding for
the Emergency Management Planner, the Emergency Management Planning
Assistant, and expenses for non -capital and capital equipment as
noted, with the balance of the grant funds being retained in a
contingency account for later allocation during the fiscal year.
An agenda item will be submitted at the appropriate time for
authorization to commit unobligated funds to the renovations and/or
capital equipment for the EOC, and completion of this year's
requirements in the Five -Year Strategic Plan.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by
Commissioner Bird, the Board unanimously approved
the Emergency Management, Preparedness and
Assistance Trust Fund which continues funding for
the Emergency Management Planner, the Emergency
Management Planning Assistant, and expenses for non -
capital and capital equipment as noted, with the
balance of the grant funds being retained in a
contingency account for later allocation during the
fiscal year, as recommended in the Memorandum.
COPY OF GRANT AGREEMENT IS ON FILE
IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
REQUEST TO USE NEW COURTHOUSE - CHRISTMAS IN
DOWNTOWN
General Services Director Sonny Dean reviewed a Memorandum of
October 23, 1996:
DATE: October 23, 1996
TO: Honorable Board of County Commissioners
THRU: James E. Chandler
County Administrator
FROM: H T. "SonrV' Dean, Director
Department of General Services
SUBJECT: Request to Use New Courthouse
BACKGROUND:
Pat Brown, Chairman of Christmas in Downtown, which is sponsored by Downtown Vero Beach
Association has requested use of the new courthouse to hold a concert on Sunday, December 1, 1996. The
idea is to present music and theater at sites all around Downtown.
89
November 5, 1996 BOOK 99 f'd,GL 9
BOOK 99 ME 60
The Board established certain criteria that must be met in order for the Courthouse Building to be used for
outside events. Staff met with Ms. Brown to discuss the policies with the following results.
1. Security - Ms. Brown talked with Sheriff Wheeler and he agreed to furnish the required
security.
2. Cleaning - Staff estimates cost to provide personnel to open the building and perform necessary -
cleaning services to cost approximately $100.00. Ms. Brown has requested these costs be
absorbed by the County.
3. Ms. Brown has agreed to execute all required paperwork to effect the use of the building.
ANALYSIS:
Based on the above there are two approval requests of the Board from Pat Brown. One is use of the
Courthouse Building for Christmas in Downtown activity and two, County to absorb all cost associated
with use of the facility.
RECOMMENDATION:
Board action is requested on the above in order for staff to proceed with necessary arrangements if
approved
Commissioner Eggert asked if every organization who used the
courthouse in the past has had to pay for cleaning service, and
Director Dean advised that prior users had paid for clean up
themselves.
Chairman Adams understood the children were just to sing, it
was not like an open house where they would be all over the
Courthouse.
MOTION WAS MADE by Commissioner Macht, SECONDED BY
Commissioner Eggert, to approve staff's
recommendation as set forth in the memorandum.
Commissioner Bird understood that the public would be in the
foyer (rotunda) and the children on the steps or balcony. That was
Director Dean's understanding of the request.
Pat Brown invited everyone to attend the various Christmas in
Downtown events. She advised that the Indian River Community
Children's Chorus would be singing inside the Courthouse. It was
envisioned that the children would be on the stairway. She wanted
to clarify that Clerk of the Circuit Court Jeff Barton had offered
to open the area in the Courthouse where the historic photographs
of Vero Beach are displayed.
THE CHAIRMAN CALLED THE QUESTION and the motion
carried unanimously.
.M
November 5, 1996
� � r
AUCTIONEER SERVICES CONTRACT - SALE OF REAL PROPERTY:
OLD COURTHOUSE, ANNEX, & OLD STATE ATTORNEY BUILDING
General Services Director Sonny Dean reviewed a Memorandum of
October 25, 1996:
DATE: October 25, 1996 - -
TO: Honorable Board of County Commissioners
THRU: James E. Chandler
County Administrator
FROM: H.T. "Son"" Dean, Director
Department of General Se es
SUBJECT: County Surplus Real Property Sale - Auctioneer Services Contract
BACKGROUND:
At the regular meeting of October 22, 1996, the Board approved a contract with Karlin Daniel &
Associates to auction off the Old Courthouse, Courthouse Annex, and Old State Attorney Building. In
accordance with this action a contract has been prepared to formalize the agreement between Indian River
County and Karlin Daniel & Associates.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends approval of the attached agreement.
Commissioner Eggert moved approval of the recommendation, but
motion died for lack of a second.
Commissioner Bird preferred to have discussion first and
Chairman Adams agreed.
In response to Commissioner Bird's concerns, Director Dean
described the procedures used for solicitation of auctioneer
services in this matter.
Ron Rennick of Ron Rennick Auctions, Inc., referred to his
letter of September 18, 1996, Director Dean's letter of October 1,
1996, and Mr. Rennick's proposal under date of October 2, 1996.
Mr. Rennick felt his company was not properly considered in this
matter and took exception to the award of the contract to Karlin
Daniel & Associates and stated that it was a "fluffy" 38 -page
unsigned proposal. Mr: Rennick felt his 'Local knowledge and
presence rendered him more expert in the properties to be
auctioned. He submitted a contract for the Board's review. He
felt that all bids on the buildings should be subject to
confirmation by the Board.
In response to Commissioner Eggert, Mr. Rennick advised that
while he had no prior experience in auctioning government
91
November 5, 1996 500K 99 PAL 608
BOOK 99 PAGE 699
buildings, he had done the city auction and felt the upcoming
auction was an unusual occurrence.
In response to Commissioner Bird's inquiry, Mr. Rennick
described his experience in auctioning commercial buildings.
Commissioner Eggert queried Mr. Rennick on his initial 10%
commission and why it was later lowered.
In response to Commissioner Bird's concern, County Attorney
Vitunac felt that Mr. Rennick should have been at last week's
meeting, when the contract was approved by the Board as it was only
before them today for ministerial matters. If the Board were to
change their decision at this point, the County would have to
reimburse Mr. Daniel for the expenses already incurred.
In response to Commissioner Macht, Director Dean explained
that staff had recommended Mr. Daniel's firm based on experience in
selling a government building in Stuart, excellent references, and
proposed elaborate advertising plan. Director Dean described Mr.
Rennick's advertising plan was to advertise in 3 local area
newspapers. Director Dean also pointed out that Mr. Daniel's firm
has an agent who lives in Indian River County and he stood by
staff's prior recommendation of Karlin Daniel & Associates.
Administrator Chandler interjected his concurrence with the
recommendation based on Mr. Daniel's firm's experience and
references.
Mr. Rennick rebutted Director Dean's comments and advised that
his advertising would focus on the market using the same procedures
he uses for other auctions. He felt local investors are the ones
likely to buy the buildings, that 90% of the market is right here
in Indian River County.
Karlin Daniel refuted the local investor comment and stated
that three packets had already been sent out to inquiries which had
come about from the Wall Street Journal advertising he had done.
He felt the market was much larger than Vero Beach. He also
advised that his logo which appeared on his proposal bears his
signature and that he is a certified auctioneer.
Commissioner Bird felt that Mr. Rennick could do a fine job,
and allowed that there may have been a miscommunication; however,
staff had reviewed both proposals and made their recommendation.
He, therefore, supported staff's recommendation.
MOTION WAS MADE by Commissioner Bird, SECONDED BY
Commissioner Eggert, to make no change and approve
the agreement with Karlin David & Associates.
92
November 5, 1996
Commissioner Macht felt that a written RFP would have avoided
this and leveled the playing field in this matter.
Chairman Adams regretted there was any miscommunication and
-agreed that a written RFP would have been a better choice in this
matter and hoped there would be an opportunity in the future for
Mr. Rennick's participation.
THE CHAIRMAN CALLED THE QUESTION and the motion
carried unanimously.
Anthony Masi, 1700 Ocean Drive, reviewed his letter, as
follows:
The Honorable Commissioner Fran Adams,
Chairman, Board of Commissioners
Administration Bldg. 1840 25th Street
Vero Beach, F1. 32960
Dear Commissioner Adams,
1700 Ocen Dr. #206
Vero Beach, F1, 32963
October 25, 1996
Reference, Agenda Item 11, C. General Services, Board of
Commissioners' Meeting on October 23, 1996,
As a concerned taxpayer, I wish to appeal Board's
approval of the "Sale of County Surplus Buildings and
Associated Real Property" for the following reasons:
1. In my opinion, the sale of the "Courthouse
Annex" and the "Old State Attorney Building do not meet
the definition of "Surplus Buildings. or fully comply with
current statutes, relating to the need and utilization of
surplus buildings.
2. Non -Compliance with Chapters 96-209 and 96-236
as they relate to "Surplus Property". provisions (274.05
and 274.06) The Board has consistently stressed the
crowded conditions of the present administration building
and the need for more space.
3. Both buildings meet the needs of the county, be
efficiently utilized, and should be retained.
4. The sale of the "Old" Courthouse will destroy an
historical legacy and major tourist anchor in the
preservation of historic downtown Vero Beach.
S. Although the neglect and lack of preventive
maintenance of the "Old" Courthouse has minimized its use,
it is a structurally sound building and can act As a
catalyst for the revitalization of historic downtown Vero
Beach. The combined price of $150,000.00 for both the
"Old" Courthouse and the Courthouse Annex is too low and
does not serve the interests of the county taxpayers.
6. The restoration cost of several million dollars
will be minimal in contrast to a new multimillion
"administration" building, or costly expansion of the
present county administration building.
93
November 5, 1996
BOU 99 mn 610
BOOK 99 PAGE 611
To eliminate or help minimize any tax burden, it is
recommended that the Board of Commissioners support the
Florida Main Street program<administered by the Division
of Historical Resources, Bureau of Historic Preservation,
Department of State), with its emphasis on organization
and designs for the promotion and economic restructioning
assists in the preservation of the historic downtown
commercial district. The Downtown Vero Beach Association
with the full support of Vero Beach City Manager, Mr.
Taylor, is coordinating this effort
It is also recommended that the Indian River County
His Society and the Downtown Vero Beach Association
be asked to assist in seeking public and private
donations, and renters for the "Old" Courthouse.
Assistance is requested in meeting the requirements of
Agenda ITEM 1S. ADJOURNMENT.
_.S-i,,ncer ly,
nthony Masi
AUCTION AGREEMENT IS ON FILE IN THE OFFICE
OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
DEFEASE BONDS - SERIES 1985 AND 1988
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of October 31, 1996:
TO: Board of County Commissioners
DATE: October 31, 1996
SUBJECT: DEFEASE THE $8,240,000 SOLID WASTE BONDS SERIES 1988 AND
THE $9,855,000 REFUND AND IMPROVEMENT BONDS, SERIES 1985
FROM: Joseph A Baird _
OMB Budget Director
DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS
Staff would like permission to proceed with defeasing the $8,240,000 Solid Waste Disposal System
Revenue bonds and the $9,855,000 Refund and Improvement Bonds, Series 1985.
The $9,855,000 Refund and Improvement Bond, Series 1985, has an 8.9% average interest rate,
$3,325,000 principle balance and a debt service payment for the 1996/97 fiscal year of $560,006.
Currently the County is earning approximately 5.3% on its investments; therefore, it makes economic
sense to pay off the debt with existing funds.
The $8,240,000 Solid Waste Disposal Bond Issue, Series 1988 has 6.96% average interest rate,
$4,440,000 in principal balance, and an annual payment for the 1996/97 fiscal year of $937,640.00.
Over two years ago staff looked at refinancing the Solid Waste bonds when interest rates were at
their lowest point, but we were unable to do so because these bonds mature in the year 2002 and
there was not sufficient time to capture issuance cost and have a present value savings. The Bond
94
November 5, 1996
Sinking Fund has $939,750 in investments and the Renewal and Replacement fund has $2,500,000
in cash, totaling approximately $3,440,000. Some of this cash would be used to defease the bonds.
Both the above mentioned Bond Issues will be defeased utilizing inter -fund borrowing as well as the
cash available in their perspective funds.
RECOMMENDATION
Authorize staff to proceed in defeasing the two above mentioned bond issues and utilize inter -fund
borrowing to do so if necessary.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by
Commissioner Bird, the Board unanimously authorized
staff to proceed to defease the $8,240,000 Solid
Waste Bonds Series 1988 and the $9,855,000 Refund
and Improvement Bonds, Series 19851 and to utilize
inter -fund borrowing to do so, if necessary, as
recommended in the Memorandum.
COUNTYWIDE TRAFFIC SIGNAL RETIMING - REQUEST FOR
PROPOSALS FROM CONSULTANTS
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of October 22, 1996:
TO: James E. Chandler,
County Administrator -
THROUGH: James W. Davis, P.E.
Public Works Director
FROM: Christopher R. Mora, P.E. Cj�
County Traffic Engineer
SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS (RFP) FROM CONSULTANT FIRMS
COUNTYWIDE TRAFFIC SIGNAL RETIMING
REF. Attached RFP
DATE: October 22, 1996
DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS
The County's Traffic Engineering Division is in need_of technical
support services in the area of traffic signal retiming. Expansion
of the County's computerized (Closed Loop) traffic signal system
and the continued traffic growth/additional traffic signals
throughout the County have resulted in a need for these services.
95
November 5, 1996 BOOK 99 PAGE 612
600K 99 PAuE 613
ALTERNATIVES AND ANALYSIS
The County Traffic Engineering Division has drafted an RFP
(attached), which describes the traffic signal timing services
needed.
RECOIi@MMATIONS & FUNDING
Staff recommends approval of the attached RFP, which will be
advertised and processed thru the County Purchasing Department.
Funding for the estimated $10,000 project cost will come from fund
109 - Secondary Road Trust Fund.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by
Commissioner Tippin, the Board unanimously approved
the RFP from consultant firms for countywide traffic
signal retiming which will be advertised and
processed through the Purchasing Department, as
recommended in the Memorandum.
ADVERTISE FOR ENGINEERING SERVICES - REPLACE OSLO ROAD
BRIDGE AT LATERAL "J" CANAL
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of October 24, 1996:
TO: James E. Chandler.
County Administrator
FROM: James W. Davis. P.E..
Public Works Director(
SUBJECT: Request to Advertise for Engineering Services to Replace Oslo Road Bridge
at Lateral "J" Canal
REF. LETTER: D.D. O'Laughlin. Adair and Brady. Inc, to Robert Keating
dated Sept. 16. 1996
DATE: October 24, 1996
DESCRIPTION AND CONDITION
Adair and Brady. Inc. engineering consultants for the Florida DOT, is proceeding
with the design of a sidewalk along Oslo Road between 18th Avenue and Timber
Ridge entrance road. Within the project limits is a bridge spanning the Lateral "J"
Canal which is scheduled for replacement in 1998/99 under the 10 Optional Sales
Tax Program. It would be advantageous at this time to proceed with selecting a
consultant for engineering design of this bridge. If the Lateral "J" canal bridge is
not completed prior to the DOT sidewalk project being constructed. a temporary
bridge to accommodate the sidewalk will be necessary.
RECOMMENDATIONS AND FUNDING
Staff recommends authorization to advertise under CCNA guidelines for consulting
services to replace the Oslo Road/Lateral "J" Canal bridge. Funding to be from
the 10 Optional Sales Tax Program.
96
November 5, 1996
ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by
Commissioner Tippin, the Board unanimously
authorized staff to advertise under CCNA guidelines
for consulting services -to replace the Oslo
Road/Lateral "J" Canal bridge, as recommended in the
Memorandum.
900 MHz COMMUNICATION SYSTEM - RETROFIT/CONVERSION OF
EXISTING PUMP STATION SCADA SYSTEM
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of October 29, 1996:
DATE: OCTOBER 29, 1996
TO: JAMES E. CHANDLER
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
FROM: TERRANCE G. PINTO
DIRECTOR OF UT1140 SSXR21VICES
PREPARED WILLIAM F. M CA , P.E.
AND STAFFED CAPITAL PR S ENGINEER
BY: DEPARTMEUTILITY SERVICES
SUBJECT: 900 MHZ COMMUNICATION SYSTEM
RETROFIT/CONVERSION OF EXISTING PUMP STATION
SCADA SYSTEM
BACKGROUND
As part of the total implementation of our 900 MHZ Communication
System, we are changing our radio communication system for pumping
stations (SCADA) to a 900 MHZ supplier. With the implementation of
a utility wide 900 MHZ system, communication will become not only
uniform but it will provide a more competitive way of purchasing
the Radio Telemetry Units (RTU) for the pumping stations as they
will not be proprietary as with the existing system.
ANALYSIS
The Utilities Department has budgeted for the conversion and
implementation of the aforementioned new SCADA communication
system. As indicated, the new 900 MHZ will provide expanded
functions at a cost savings of approximately $900.00 per unit, when
compared to the existing 406 MHZ system. The change will also
provide compatibility to the operating control system for each
wastewater treatment plant.
RECOMMENDATION
The staff of the Department of Utility Services recommends that the
Board of County Commissioners approve the commencement of the 900
MHZ System implementation and conversion as outlined above changing
from the Data Flow System to the consolidated Data Flow Scada
System.
97
November 5, 1996 BOOK 99 FACE 614
BOOK 99 PAPE 615
MOTION WAS MADE by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED BY
Commissioner Bird, to approve staff's recommendation
as set forth in the memorandum.
In response to Commissioner Tippin's concern, Utility Services
Director_ Terry Pinto explained how the 900 MHz system differs from
the 800 MHz system particularly since it does not accommodate voice
communications.
THE CHAIRMAN CALLED THE QUESTION and the motion
carried unanimously.
BID NO. 6067 - SUBURBAN ACRES (34th TERRACE) WATER SERVICE
- DRIVEWAYS, INC.
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of October 21, 1996:
DATE: OCTOBER 21, 1996
TO: JAMES E. CHANDLER
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
FROM: TERRANCE G*PINTO
DIRECTOR OF UTIL ERVICES
PREPARED MICHAEL C. HOTCHKISS, P.E. A
AND STAFFED ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEER
BY: DEPARTMENT OF UTILITY SERVICES
SUBJECT: SUBURBAN ACRES (34TH TERRACE) WATER SERVICE
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY PROJECT NO. UW -96 -02 -DS
BID NO. 6067
BACKGROUND
On August 6, 1996, the Board of County Commissioner's awarded Bid
No. 6067 to Driveways, Inc. in the amount of $27,285.00 to provide
water service and fire protection to the above -referenced
subdivision. The project is now complete and the Department of
Environmental Protection has issued clearence to begin connecting
customers. The Department of Utility Services is now prepared to
make final payment to the contractor.
ANAT,Y.qTq
The contractor was paid an initial draw in the amount of $22,320.90
for 910 of the project, less retainage. Utilities staff is now
prepared to make final payment- in the amount of $4,964.10 (see
attached final pay request).
RECOMMENDATION
The staff of the Department of Utility Services recommends approval
of the final payment in the amount of $4,964.10.
98
November 5, 1996
ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by
Commissioner Bird, the Board unanimously approved
final payment in the amount of $4,964.10 to
Driveways, Inc., as recommended in the Memorandum.
REQUEST IS ON FILE IN THE OFFICE
OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
WASTEWATER SERVICE FOR CUSTOMER ON DURRANCE PLACE
(postponed from BCC Meeting of 10/22/96)
County Attorney Vitunac reviewed a Memorandum of October 30,
1996:
To: Boar�of County Commissioners
FROM: Char es P. Vitu ac, County �orney
DATE: October 30, 1996 (dictated 10/29/96)
RE: Wastewater Service for Customer on Durrance Place
At the last meeting of the Board of County Commissioners, the Board
authorized our office to coordinate with Chairman Fran Adams to determine the
best method of providing public wastewater service to a portion of Lot 1 in
the Durrance Place Subdivision. For the Board's reference, this subdivision
is composed of private roads with lots being serviced by wells and septic
tanks. The lot in question is below the minimum size required to receive a
state permit for a septic tank. There was opposition by certain neighbors in
the subdivision to allowing a public sewer down the private streets for
various reasons, and the staff and Chairman were asked to look at alterna-
tives for providing service to the property.
After reviewing the plat of Durrance Place, it is our belief that the
following options are available:
1. Accept the offer made in the plat (Plat Book 9, Page 6) to accept the
roads in the subdivision as public and subsequently construct a public
sewer line in the public right of way. The difficulties with this
approach are that the existing roadway is not located as indicated on
the plat, with the plat roadway being more or less in wetland areas. In
addition, the roadway is below the minimum standards normally accepted
by the County and is ,unpaved.
2. The second alternative recognizes that all lot owners in the subdivision
have a right to use the private roadway for access and utility service;
therefore, the County could act as the agent for the wastewater
applicant and construct a single -service line in the private right of
way to the applicant's property. The line would be sized --to service
only the one property. Anyone who would challenge this construction
would have to show better title than the County has, and it is not clear
from the plat who that would be.
3. Take no action.
M
November 5, 1996 BOOK 99 PA -UE 616
BOOK 99 P,fu 617
Recommendation: Although there is some risk in either of the first two
alternatives, staff recommends proceeding with alternative #2 if the Board
desires to make public wastewater service available to the lot in question.
Richard Henn, a resident on Durrance Place, asked why other
property owners had not been notified and wondered what made the
lot in question unique. He also believed that he was being used
for the benefit of someone else, advised that he wanted the sewer
originally, predicted this was a foot in the door, and that the lot
in question was subdivided in spite of advice against same to the
prior owner. Mr. Henn also reported that his father-in-law was not
in favor of approval in this matter.
County Attorney Vitunac responded that notification is done
in rezoning matters and explained that the platted road is under
water and that no one has paid taxes on the road.
In response to Chairman Adams, Utility Services Director Terry
Pinto advised there was no intent to force anyone to hook up unless
they request it.
Chairman Adams predicted the Board would be seeing more of
these requests.
Mr. Henn asked if his yard would be dug up, and County
Attorney Vitunac advised that the line would be put under the road.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by
Commissioner Bird, the Board unanimously approved
Alternative #2, as recommended in the Memorandum.
ISSUE RFP FOR SPECIAL PUBLIC DEFENDER
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of October 29, 1996:
TO: Board of County Commissioners
FROM: Terrence P. O'Brien - Assistant County Attorney
DATE: October 29, 1996
RE: SPECIAL PUBLIC DEFENDER CONTRACT
Since January, 1993, the County has had a contract with the law offices
of James T. Long, P.A., to provide legal representation of indigent
adults and juveniles in certain types of criminal cases. The contract
was awarded after a committee comprised of a commissioner, the chief
judge of the 19th Circuit, the Public Defender and the County Attorney - -
determined that it was both cost-effective and efficient for the County
100
November 5, 1996
�� i
to enter into such a contract. The Board of County Commissioners
then published an invitation to bid. A contract was executed with Mr.
Long on a flat fee per case basis of $600.00 for non -capital felony cases
and $300.00 for misdemeanor and juvenile. The original contract had an
expiration date of December 31, 1994 but was extended to December 31,
1995 and again to December 31, 1996.
It appears appropriate to again issue an RFP rather than just keep
extending the present contract. Accordingly, it is recommended that
the Board authorize the issuance of the attached RFP and authorize the
formation of a review committee as before. The proposed RFP provides
for bidding on a flat fee per case basis and a lump sum bid for all
cases.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by
Commissioner Bird, the Board unanimously approved
issuance of the RFP to provide legal representation
for indigent adults and juveniles in Indian River
County and authorized the formation of a review
committee as before, as recommended '`in the
Memorandum.
FAC SELECT CONIlVIITTEE - TELECONICATIONS MEETING
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of October 30, 1996:
TO: Board of County Commissioners
FROM: Char es P. Lnac, County Attorney
DATE: October 30, 1996 (dictated 10/29/96)
RE: Telecommunications Policy
I have received the attached invitation to attend the meeting of the
Florida Association of Counties' Select Committee on Telecommunications
on Thursday, November 7, 1996, at Miami International Airport from 1:00
p.m. until 5:00 p.m. I am already scheduled to attend the annual
meeting of the Treasure Coast Council of Local Governments that night in
St. Lucie County at 6:30 p.m. I would be happy to attend either meeting
at the pleasure of the Board, but will need to have someone assigned to
cover the other meeting.
Requested Action: Respectfully request direction from the Board.
After a brief discussion, it was decided that Commissioner
Tippin would attend the committee meeting in Tallahassee and that
County Attorney Vitunac would not attend the meeting in Miami.
101
November 5, 1996 �ry
BOOK 79 PAGE a �18
BOOK 99 619
DISCUSSION ON ETHICS ORDINANCE CONCERNING INDIAN RIVER
MALL GRAND OPENING EWITATIONS AND OTHERS
Commissioner Bird opened discussion advising that he had
received numerous invitations recently relative to the opening of
the Indian River Mall and other events and that he would be
precluded from attending many of these events because of the Ethics
Ordinance as it is presently. He believed the ordinance to be an
affront to the honesty and integrity of the Board of County
Commissioners and staff, that it was too stringent and restricts
the ability of Commissioners to do their job. He recommended that
it be softened or that the County revert to the State Statute which
governs the Constitutional Officers and others.
Commissioner Eggert stated that the ribbon -cutting is
something she wanted to attend, but she felt the $50 Gala tickets
(for the benefit of United Way) should not be accepted by Board or
staff members.
County Attorney Vitunac reasoned they could make the $50 Gala
donation themselves and go to the Gala. They were not prohibited
from going to the other (free) events at the Mall.
Commissioner Eggert thought that people should be able to go
to the openings, but she understood the hesitancy of attending an
event given by a consultant that could be hired by the county.
Chairman Adams thought it became difficult to separate. With
respect to the invitations to the Gala, she felt that staff was
being recognized for their efforts. She wondered if there might be
an exception in the ethics ordinance to permit staff to go with the
complimentary tickets if the Board were to agree on it. In an
effort to narrow the issue to the Mall opening, she summarized the
two issues which needed to be determined today: should staff go to
the Gala and what was the real intent in setting up the Ethics
Ordinance.
Commissioner Macht pointed out that this is a fund raiser, and
that staff is well-paid and able to make a contribution just like
anybody else. He wondered if the Board was ready to get into a
situation where people are expressly recognized for doing,
possibly, more for one organization than for another.
Chairman Adams and Commissioner Eggert felt staff does equally
for everybody.
County Attorney Vitunac thought a plaque would be an
acceptable exception, but he did not think exception number 7 meant
for rewards to allow staff to go free to a $50 function.
102
• November 5, 1996
I
Commissioner Tippin maintained that government cannot
legislate morals, and Commissioner Macht asserted that the
ordinance legislated actions.
CONSENSUS was reached that staff can attend the Mall
ribbon cutting, but must purchase their own ticket to
attend the Gala fund-raising event; staff to schedule a
workshop after November 19th to revisit the ordinance.
CHILDREN'S SERVICES ADVISORY COMMITTEE REPORT
Commissioner Macht recounted the history of the County's
desires to fund services for children. He believed the County has
a responsibility to fund those services. He then reviewed the
following information supplied to Commissioners prior to the
meeting:
Indian River County
Children's Services Advisory
Council
Report -- Subcommittee
Purpose: Establish Vision, Mission,
Goals
Committee Membership
♦ Jean Kline, R.N. IRCHD
♦ Beverly O'Neill,R.N. IRC Hospital
District
♦ Kay Youngbluth, United Way
♦ Joyce Johnston, IRC Welfare
♦ Colette Heid, IRC Substance Abuse
Council
♦ Katie Nall, IRC Healthy Start
♦ Nancy Retzer, CCCR
♦ Gayle Masters, Planned Parenthood
103
November 5, 1996 gp®K 99 PAU 620
Vision
*Promote
Healthy
Children in a
Healthy
Community
Mission
HOOK
99 PAGE 621
*Enhance the lives of the
children in Indian River County
and enable them to attain their
full potential.
GOAL
♦ Provide a unified system
within which children's
needs can be:
— identified A
— targeted
— addressed
— evaluate
by public and private all*
agencies throughout the
community.
104
November 5, 1996
S
Strategies:
Identify & Define
Utilize eAsting
resouce directories
Identify Gaps
Targeting
♦ At Risk
Populations
o Prioritize
Target -- Develop outcome objectives
to assure:
• Access to quality, affordable health care.
• A roof overhead, food on the table and clothes
on back.
• Growing up in a nonviolent, drug free
environment.
• A safe place to play.
105
November 5, 1996 BOOK 99 P1�E 6Z�
BOOK
Target (continued)
• Arriving at school ready to learn.
• Job opportunities, resources and skills so
that parents can care for their children.
• Affordable, quality child care while parents
are at work.
• The opportunity to develop skills and have a
well paying job.
• Adult role modeling through mentoring,
parenting education, etc.
Address
♦ With the cooperation
and collaboration of
public and private
services agencies to
evaluate reaching the
targeted populations
and achieving
outcome objectives.
♦ Recommend directing
and redirecting
services and funding
sources to meet the
outcome objectives.
Evaluate Outcomes
♦ One, three, and five year measures in
achieving outcome objectives
♦ Customer Satisfaction
♦ Compliance with fiscal and administrative
criteria
106
99 PAGE 623
November 5, 1996
M M
•
i.�
Indian River County Non -Profit Agency Request
Review Process
♦ Establish a 9-13 member volunteer committee with county
commission representation; others members should reflect the
diversity of the residents of the county. No member shall be a
recipient or affiliated with a non-profit organization applying for or
receiving county funding.
♦ Through a established process:
» needs, gaps and effectiveness of current and proposed
programs.
» set priorities for funding
» set standands: fiscal, administrative and programmatic
which are outcome based.
» develop a "request for proposal (RFP)" process to evaluate
funding request.
♦ Within an established allocation from the County Commission,
the committee will function as a "clearing house" for:
» to receive funding requests --RFPs.
evaluate based on established needs and standards.
» make recommendations for funding to the Board of
County Commissioners.
♦ Throughout the year, the committee will meet to review and
evaluate funded agencies' compliance with standards, conduct
on-site visits and report findings to Board of County
Commissioners.
Commissioner Macht envisioned that funds would be requested
and funding would be increased in order to bring help where help is
needed. He asked for consensus to move the idea forward.
Commissioner Eggert was concerned who would be on the
committee to determine the needs/costs and when and how the project
would be funded, and Commissioner Macht advised it would be
citizens from the community, not the care givers or their
associates. Commissioner Macht was not exactly certain how it
would work, but, Judge Kanarak was very interested in developing
priorities.
Commissioner Eggert asked which would come first, the funding
request or the setting of priorities and proposals; it sounded to
her that the committee would come in with a list and recommend how
much funding would be needed.
November 5, 1996
107
BOOK 99 FAu.-L624
BOOK , 99 PAGE 625
Commissioner Macht had no idea what the original funding
amount might be, but believed that what funding there is now bears
no relationship to what it will be.
Jean Kline, administrator with the IRC Health Department, had
chaired the committee. She explained they had a formidable task to
address the several concerns brought to the table. They are
looking at the non-profit organizations who have requested funding
in the past, but have been unfunded due to budget constraints. The
committee was interested in providing services that are either not
being provided or are provided ineffectively. She expected a lot
of time and effort would be necessary to determine the needs not
being met in the community and deciding the amount of funding to
meet those needs. It has yet to be specifically determined who
would be on the 9-13 member committee, but it would probably
consist of representatives from various groups in the community.
Members would not be associated with the agencies requesting the
funding.
Commissioner Eggert had concerns of overlap with other
organizations.
Commissioner Macht pointed out that many organizations that
serve children also serve others, so there may be overlap. He
thought the best way was programmatic, where the applying agency
presents to the committee a specific program with a specific amount
of funds required.
Commissioner Eggert pointed out that the County has
requirements to match certain State grants; programs already in
place should not be jeopardized by new ones.
Commissioner Macht then asked for conceptual approval.
Commissioner Eggert wanted to see it come back in more
specific detail, such as who is going to do what and why. While
she was not opposed to having children's services, she thought the
Board needs to be very careful how it will be done.
Chairman Adams thought a ballpark figure would be helpful.
OMB Director Joe Baird recalled that in the committee meeting
they concentrated on the non-profit organizations, setting up a
committee to review them, with priorities and objectives set by the
Board. Presently the non-profit organizations' allocation runs
about $260,000, in the children's non-profit line item, there is
only $70-90 thousand budgeted, which is not a lot of money.
Commissioner Macht interjected that consideration should not
be limited to non-profit organizations and emphasized it should be
a line item.
108
• November 5, 1996
Commissioner Eggert submitted it could easily become a $5
million issue and Commissioner Macht believed the Board should not
shrink from it.
Commissioner Tippin favored having the committee looking at
the need, massaging it, and coming to the Board with a
recommendation. He believed that was what Commissioner Macht had
in mind.
Judge Paul Kanarak thought the place to start was with a
budgeted dollar amount. He agreed that a structure needed to be
addressed and also thought children's services needed to be
addressed.
Concerning the not-for-profit groups, Commissioner Eggert
believed it important to state that our priority is children. She
wanted a more specific proposal on how they would determine the
needs, priorities, et cetera, and what that might cost. She also
wanted more specific information on how the committee would be set
up and what its duties would be. Also, she felt there needed to be
a sense of budget required for next year. It seemed to her that
there would be some costs prior to budgeting for the program.
Ms. Kline agreed with Commissioner Eggert but one of the
objectives is to have this as part of the Comprehensive Plan.
Commissioner Macht thought it would be necessary to have a
staff coordinator. He believed there is now someone on staff and
would speak to the Administrator concerning possible reassignment.
Commissioner Eggert stressed again the need for specific
information.
Rosemarie Livings, director of attendance of Indian River
County Schools and hearing officer, pointed out for consideration
that the Indian River County Juvenile Justice Council has all the
right people to do this work and they have been working toward this
already. They are in place and ready to assist and she suggested
the Board might look at what has already been done by this Council.
She pointed out that Highlands County already has a "dependent
district", that Okeechobee County already has $1 million in their
program, and she believed Martin County has about $2 million in
their program.
Commissioner Eggert did not feel that the Council members were
the exact people who should be doing this work. She felt some are
and some are not, it all depended on who the representative is. -
Commissioner Macht asked for a consensus of a range to be
considered and he will reconvene the group to work on the specifics
that Commissioner Eggert requested.
109 K 99 P�uk�l-%
November 5, 1996 600
[:,
MOTION WAS MADE by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by
Commissioner Tippin, to approve the idea in concept
and request the following:
a) Need to know exactly what we have to
gather to set needs and priorities, how much it
might cost the County to do it and who will do it.
b) Exactly who will be on the 9 to 13 member
committee; what staff will be needed, start up cost,
and RFP procedure, when is budget proposed, and
budget amount.
C) Evaluation procedure.
99 PAGE 62 7
Under discussion, Commissioner Macht reiterated that this will
involve more money than currently being spent. Commissioner Eggert
thought that, when approved, the people of the county should be
able to understand the program and what the money means to it. She
predicted that the taxpayers will let the Board know how they feel.
THE CHAIRMAN CALLED THE QUESTION and the motion
carried unanimously.
SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL DISTRICT
Chairman Adams announced that immediately upon adjournment,
the Board would reconvene sitting as the Commissioners of the Solid
Waste Disposal District.
Those Minutes are being prepared separately.
There being no further business, on Motion duly made, seconded
and carried, the Board adjourned at 12:55 p.m.
ATTEST:
J. K. Barton, Clerk
Minutes approved on '07 - 129 -1(0
110
November 5, 1996
Fran B. Adams, Chairman