HomeMy WebLinkAbout2025-293IRC LANDFILL WORK ORDER NUMBER 2
Desien Partial and Tem
rary Closure of Cell
Control Syste
2 and Evaluate the Gas Collection and
m (GCCS
This Indian River County (IRC) Landfill Work Order Number 2 is entered into as of this 9th day of
D30erber , 202 5 in accordance with FS 287.055, Consultant's Competitive Negotiation Act per the Request for
Qualification #2023031for Engineering Consulting Services for Landfill Closure, Landfill Gas System Expansion,
and Cell Construction, dated April 4, 2023 (referred to as the "Agreement"), by and between INDIAN RIVER
COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Florida ("COUNTY") and Geosyntec Consultants, Inc.
("Consultant").
The COUNTY has selected the Consultant to perform the professional services set forth on
Exhibit A (Scope of Work), attached to this Work Order and made part hereof by this reference. The
professional services will be performed by the Consultant for the fee schedule set forth in Exhibit B
(Fee Schedule), attached to this Work Order and made a part hereof by this reference. The Consultant
will perform the professional services within the timeframe more particularly set forth in Exhibit C
(Time Schedule), attached to this Work Order and made a part hereof by this reference all in
accordance with the terms and provisions set forth in the Agreement. Pursuant to Section 1 of the
Agreement, nothing contained in any Work Order shall conflict with the terms of the Agreement and
the terms of the Agreement shall be deemed to be incorporated in each individual Work Order as if
fully set forth herein.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Work Order as of the date first
written above.
CONSULTANT: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIQXV61"1s ;3-,.,,
Geosyntec Consultants, Inc. OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
"s
By: C `yWr / BY:
Deryl Loar, Chairrr an-. Q_
Print Name: Todd Kafka
Title: Vice President
T�csrber 9, 2025 . R C0.'
BCC Approved Date: ••-
Attest: Ryan L. Butler, Clerk of Court and Comptroller
By
Approved:
Approved as to form and legal sufficiency:
ab I r7 0(2*A , I(YA—Q,�
Deputy Clerk
John A. Titkanich, Jr., County Administrator
Christc*hhr Hicks, Assistant, County Attorney
EXHIBIT A
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
c>
Geosyntec
consultants
Mr. Himanshu Mehta, P.E.
Managing Director
Solid Waste Disposal District
Indian River County
1325 74th Avenue SW
Vero Beach, Florida 32968
3504 Lake Lynda Drive, Suite 155
Orlando, Florida 32817
PH 321.244.1476
www.geosyntec.com
21 November 2025
Subject: Proposal to Design Partial and Temporary Closure of Cell 1/2
and Evaluate the Gas Collection and Control System (GCCS)
Indian River County (IRC) Class I Landfill and C&D Disposal Facility
Vero Beach, Indian River County, Florida
Dear Mr. Mehta:
Geosyntec Consultants, Inc. (Geosyntec) is submitting this proposal to the Indian River County
(IRC) Solid Waste Disposal District (SWDD) to provide professional services pertaining to the
partial (north face) and temporary (south face) closure of Cell 12 and the evaluation
and optimization of the gas collection and control system (GCCS) for the Class I Landfill at the
IRC Landfill (IRCL) facility located in Vero Beach, Indian River County, Florida. The
proposal presents the scope of work, schedule, and budget estimate for the task. The proposal
was prepared in response to a meeting on October 28, 2025 between Geosyntec and IRC Solid
Waste Disposal District (SWDD).
The remainder of this proposal presents: (i) project background; (ii) proposed scope of work; (iii)
anticipated schedule; and (iv) budget estimate.
PROPOSED SCOPE OF WORK
For budgeting purposes, the proposed scope of work has been divided into the following phases:
• Phase 1 — General Consulting/Meeting Support/Project Management;
• Phase 2 — Closure Alternative Evaluation, Costing, and Selection;
• Phase 3 — Closure of Cell 2;
• Phase 4 — FDEP Engagement and Permit Modification;
• Phase 5 — Assessment of Existing GCCS;
• Phase 6 — Wellfield Evaluation;
• Phase 7 — Future Wellfield Expansion Evaluation; and
• Phase 8 — Miscellaneous Engineering Support Services.
NCP2525235\IRC Partial Closure & GCCS Evaluation
engineers I scientists I innovators
Mr. Himanshu Mehta, P. E.
21 November 2025
Page 2
Phase 1: General Consulting/Meeting Support/Project Management
Phase 1 consists of three components: general consulting, meeting support, updating the site health
and safety plan, and project management. Geosyntec will provide SWDD with consulting services
necessary to initiate the project. Geosyntec will prepare presentation graphics, engineering
drawings, and other documents required to support the Project's meetings and coordination
activities.
A kickoff meeting with SWDD is proposed before the start of project activities so that the specific
project requirements can be discussed. If required by SWDD, Geosyntec will prepare for and
attend a meeting with the SWDD Board to explain the project scope and budget requirements. In
addition, review meetings will be held with SWDD during the various phases of the project
implementation schedule. Following each meeting, Geosyntec will prepare meeting minutes that
document decisions reached in the meetings.
Project management activities will include: budget and schedule tracking, invoice review, and
project communications, including the preparation of a monthly progress report. The project report
will include a description of the activities completed during the month and planned activities for
the following month. In addition, the progress report will identify any technical or administrative
issues that require SWDD's attention and the current status of the budget and schedule.
For the purpose of this budget estimate, Geosyntec has included three meetings under Phase 1: (i)
one kickoff meeting with SWDD; (ii) one meeting with the SWDD Board, if requested by SWDD;
and (iii) one meeting with SWDD at the completion of Phase 7 of the Project. Additional meetings
are addressed in the remaining phases of this proposal.
Phase 2: Closure Alternative Evaluation, Costing, and Selection
This phase will include a comparative evaluation of up to three closure alternatives, assumed to
include a conventional cap (geomembrane plus two feet of vegetated cover soil), ClosureTurf®
final cover system, and an alternative cap that utilizes geosynthetic clay liner (GCL) material
instead of geomembrane.
The closure alternative evaluation will consider, at a minimum, the following criteria:
environmental protection and impacts, regulatory consistency, cost, schedule, and constructability.
Geosyntec will summarize the evaluation criteria above in a brief memorandum and meet with
IRC SWDD to review and develop a final ranking of the options presented. Geosyntec anticipates
the preferred closure method will be identified following the meeting with IRC SWDD.
NCP2525235\IRC Partial Closure & GCCS Evaluation
engineers I scientists I innovators
Mr. Himanshu Mehta, P. E.
21 November 2025
Page 3
Phase 3: Closure of Cell 1/2
Phase 2 of this Project includes activities necessary to design a closure system for Cell 1/2,
consisting of an approximately 8.5 -acre partial final closure area along the northern -facing
slope and an approximately 11.1 -acre temporary closure along the southern/southwestern
facing slope. Geosyntec will subcontract Peavey Surveying to complete the existing
conditions survey of the identified closure locations.
The initial step in the closure design, Geosyntec will perform a preliminary stormwater evaluation
to compare pre- versus post -capping stormwater runoff and function of the existing facility
stormwater management system. A brief memorandum will be prepared and submitted to IRC
SWDD documenting the preliminary stormwater evaluation approach, assumptions, and results.
While the stormwater evaluation will also serve to guide design of the stormwater management
system design for the proposed final cover system, we do not anticipate generating a formal set of
calculations that would be required for an Environmental Resource Permit (ERP) application. No
ERP modification application is anticipated or assumed as part of the proposed scope of work. We
assume that a brief teleconference will be held with IRC SWDD to discuss the stormwater
evaluation summary memo.
Geosyntec will prepare a draft set of closure design plan drawings. The drawings will depict
preliminary grading to prepare for placement of cover system materials, proposed gas management
features, proposed stormwater features (e.g., final cover drainage berms, down chutes) and
modifications to existing stormwater features (e.g., stormwater detention ponds and perimeter
drainage channels), if necessary. Details required to prepare subgrade, install cover system
components, and construct stormwater management features will also be developed as a part of
the draft design. The draft closure design drawings are assumed to include the following sheets:
1. Title Sheet;
2. General Notes;
3. Existing Site Conditions;
4. Subgrade Grading Plan;
5. Gas Management Plan;
6. Top of Final Cover Grading Plan;
7. Stormwater Management Plan;
8. Final Cover Details;
9. Gas Management Details; and
10. Stormwater Management Details.
NCP2525235\IRC Partial Closure & GCCS Evaluation
engineers I scientists I innovators
Mr. Himanshu Mehta, P. E.
21 November 2025
Page 4
Geosyntec will provide the draft closure design drawings to IRC SWDD for review and schedule
a meeting to discuss comments. Geosyntec will incorporate feedback from IRC SWDD to develop
permit level design drawings for submittal to FDEP with the closure permit application.
Phase 4: FDEP Engagement and Permit Modification
A virtual pre -closure meeting will be scheduled with FDEP Central District to discuss the
preliminary and temporary closure design and requirements and potential permit modifications.
Two Geosyntec staff will attend the meeting. If necessary, we assume a permit modification
application will include the following components;
• Cover letter and Engineering Report;
• FDEP permit modification application Form 62-701.900(1), F.A.0 (If required);
• Design Calculations;
o If ClosureTurf' is selected the following technical documentation will need to be
prepared to complete a permit modification (For budgeting purposes these design
calculations were included in this budget):
• Cover veneer slope stability analysis to demonstrate that the product
provides an adequate factor of safety against sliding (veneer) failure along
the plane of the geosynthetics.
■ As part of this analysis, Geosyntec has assumed that one series of
interface friction tests (i.e., three tests, each run at different applied
stresses) will be performed using site-specific soils and a 12"x12"
sample of the ClosureTurfrM product to develop an interface shear
strength for use in design.
■ Landfill gas uplift evaluation to demonstrate that slope stability can be
maintained in the presence of potential gas pressure buildup beneath the
ClosureTurfrM.
■ As part of this evaluation, Geosyntec has assumed effort to collect
three rounds of gas pressure measurements at each of the gas stub -
out locations within the partial closure area along the west and
southern sideslopes of Cells 1 and 2.
• Wind uplift analysis.
■ Transmissivity evaluation to demonstrate equivalence with the currently
permitted geocomposite drainage layer.
NCP2525235MC Partial Closure & GCCS Evaluation
engineers I scientists i innovators
Mr. Himanshu Mehta, P. E.
21 November 2025
Page 5
■ HELP model analysis to demonstrate that the design leachate head over the
liner is equal or less than the permitted (prescribed) final cover system.
• Soil erosion analysis to evaluate the rate of loss of the sand ballast layer
used in the ClosureTurfrM product.
■ Weathering resistance evaluation to demonstrate that the exposed artificial
turf component of ClosureTurf will retain sufficient strength over the course
of the SCMM facility closure period.
• Permit level drawings;
• Technical Specifications and Construction Quality Assurance (CQA) Plan. For the
purpose of defining scope, the technical specifications and corresponding CQA Plan are
assumed to include the following components:
o Surveying;
o Clearing and Grubbing;
o Earthwork;
o Trenching and Backfilling;
o Riprap;
o Sediment and Erosion Control;
o Storm Water Conveyances;
o Geotextiles;
o Geocomposite;
o Geomembrane;
o Synthetic Turf System (if ClosureTurf® option is selected);
o Geosynthetic Clay Liner (if a GCL is used in the final cover system);
o Interface Friction Conformance Testing;
o Vegetative Layer; and
o Vegetation.
• We assume the closure operation plan requirements will be discussed in the Engineering
Report;
• Based on input from IRC SWDD, we understand that Financial Assurance Cost Estimate
Calculations are not required for this permit application submittal if the traditional closure
design is chosen. If Closure Turf is determined to be used an update to the FACE will be
required and is not considered a part of this proposal; and
• Regarding a Long -Term Care Plan, we understand that the permit application will be for
closure only and that long-term care requirements currently in place for the facility will be
modified subsequently, under a separate scope of work, if necessary.
NCP2525235\IRC Partial Closure & GCCS Evaluation
engineers I scientists I innovators
Mr. Himanshu Mehta, P. E.
21 November 2025
Page 6
Geosyntec will provide one electronic copy of the draft permit application package to IRC SWDD
for review. Following receipt of comments from IRC SWDD on the draft documents, Geosyntec
will produce an electronic copy of the final permit application for submittal to FDEP and IRC
SWDD. Geosyntec has assumed IRC SWDD will pay any fees associated with a permit
modification in accordance with paragraph 62-701.315(3)(a), F.A.C. for Class I landfills.
No effort is assumed for responses to Request for Additional Information (RAIs) at this time. The
level of effort required for RAI responses will be evaluated upon receipt of RAIs and a separate
budget addendum will be developed based on the anticipated responses.
Phase 5: Assessment of Existing GCCS
A thorough understanding of the functionality of the existing GCCS is crucial to SWDD's
satisfaction of gas quantity and quality targets for the overall GCCS and RNG facility operational
objectives. Geosyntec recommends that a GCCS assessment be performed to benchmark the
current operational status of the GCCS. The .information gleaned from this assessment will be
critical to identifying underperforming areas of the GCCS and optimizing performance of the
existing system. As such, Geosyntec's scope of services for this task will include a combination
of in -field data collection and office -based data interpretation and modeling.
Members of Geosyntec's team will visit the site and perform a review of the existing GCCS. This
will include the following in -field services:
• Kickoff meeting to discuss the objectives and logistics associated with the field work. It is
assumed that Nopetro and SWDD staff will attend the meeting to provide information
regarding operation of the GCCS wellfield and flare;
• visual inspection of each vertical well for damage, subsidence, leakage, compromised
operation, and other observable conditions;
• water level measurements in each accessible vertical gas collection well, including a sounding
of the total well depth;
• vertical well proofing to assess verticality and accessibility of the well casing;
• identification of the solid casing/screen transition in each accessible well; and
• a site -wide Sniffer DRONE flyover to capture methane emissions data at the surface of the
landfill. Sniffer Robotics, Inc. will perform the flyover and provide the following
deliverables:
o Leak source location report that provides locations where methane emissions would
exceed minimum thresholds for remediation if inspected in accordance with USEPA
Method 21 methods.
NCP2525235\IRC Partial Closure & GCCS Evaluation
engineers I scientists I innovators
Mr. Himanshu Mehta, P. E.
21 November 2025
Page 7
o Map depicting ground -level methane emission concentrations.
o Estimated fugitive gas emissions for the landfill. Corresponding methane emissions
estimates will be provided in terms of gas flow (e.g., standard cubic feet per minute).
o Wellfield Action Plan and Emissions Mitigation Report
In addition to the data collected, we will request that SWDD provide the following information at
least two weeks prior to the start of our field activities:
• historic well construction logs for each landfill gas (LFG) well;
• topographic site -wide survey, in AutoCAD, with the location of each GCCS well, leachate
riser, or other LFG extraction device as well as piping schematics;
• copies of the past six months of data from GCCS monitoring and tuning events (in Excel -
compatible format, if possible);
• liquid level measurements within the landfill for the past six months, if available;
• gas generation or other GCCS performance reports (e.g., flare operating records); and
• operation and maintenance reports for routine repairs and maintenance and repairs to the
GCCS.
In addition to these services, Geosyntec's field personnel will meet with SWDD staff to obtain a
better understanding of the current GCCS operational goals and challenges. This meeting may be
a part of the kickoff meeting and/or as anecdotal conversations during the wellfield inspection and
data collection.
Based on the assumption that the in -field assessment will need to start by the end of June,
Geosyntec is proposing to utilize subcontractors, B&M Excavating LLC and Sniffer, to perform
the field work.
Phase 6: Wellfield Evaluation
Geosyntec will provide an evaluation of the current well conditions in Segment 1, Segment 2 and
Cell 1 of Segment 3 based on the site investigation of Phase 5. This evaluation is intended to
identify potential issues with wells that are either damaged or non-functional and propose their
rehabilitation, replacement or removal for optimization purposes. Replacement or enhancement of
pumping system components will also be proposed as applicable. In addition, installation of newer
wells might also be proposed to optimize performance. The evaluation would also include the
analysis of well influence areas to identify if the GCCS wellfield may benefit from a denser
configuration.
NCP2525235URC Partial Closure & GCCS Evaluation
engineers I scientists I innovators
Mr. Himanshu Mehta, P. E.
21 November 2025
Page 8
Following the collection of the in -field data, Geosyntec will perform data interpretation and
modeling including:
• summarizing field data into spreadsheets and tables;
• develop a 3D data visualization figure that provides an illustrative depiction of methane and
oxygen content at each wellhead and interpreted distribution across the landfill, methane
distribution, in -landfill liquid levels, and well locations with screen intervals (as possible);
and
• submission of a brief memo summarizing the data, presenting the 3D visualization model,
data tables, and preliminary recommendations regarding current GCCS operation and short to
mid-term enhancements to improve gas quality and quantity.
Following submission of the memo, Geosyntec will schedule a meeting, via Teams, to review the
memo with Nopetro and SWDD. The purpose of the meeting will be to discuss the results of the
field assessment; project objectives; development of a prioritized list of repairs, upgrades, or other
recommendations; and development of forward-looking goals pertaining to the GCCS design.
Phase 7: Future Wellfield Expansion Evaluation
Geosyntec will provide an evaluation of the permitted Segment 3 expansion GCCS system that
has not yet been installed for Cells 2 thru Cell 8. This would include analyzing the individual
influence areas and checking if further densification of the well network is needed for the proposed
system for Segment 3.
Phase 8: Miscellaneous Engineering Support Services
This phase is intended to cover the general engineering/consulting services surrounding
supplementary tasks involving the various SWDD projects and needs not covered under a specific
Phase above. These activities may include, but are not limited to, effort involved with collaboration
on behalf of IRC SWDD with Nopetro or SCS, consulting services involving the new infrastructure
at the landfill, and analysis/redesign of existing systems..
NCP2525235\IRC Partial Closure & GCCS Evaluation
engineers I scientists I innovators
Mr. Himanshu Mehta, P. E.
21 November 2025
Page 9
BUDGET ESTIMATE
The following assumptions were used by Geosyntec in developing the budget estimate presented
below:
• The total project duration will be approximately 6 months from NTP.
• No laboratory expenses are anticipated within this scope of work.
• No construction -phase services are included in this proposed Scope of Work.
• No field programming is included in this proposed Scope of Work.
• Issued For Bid (IFB) Drawings provided to Geosyntec by SWDD (prepared by CDM
Smith, dated January 2018) are considered to be current and represent accurate as -built
information.
• IRC SWDD review of each Phase's deliverables will be completed within two (2) weeks
from submittal, with comments returned to Geosyntec completing the review process.
• All hours worked on the Project will be invoiced at the rates indicated in the detailed budget
estimate with no premium charged for overtime.
• Geosyntec will minimize courier fees by exchanging information between IRC SWDD and
Geosyntec via e-mail and follow-up by regular mail. However, some express shipments
may be unavoidable. Although not included in this budget estimate, shipping or other
similar communication fees incurred will be invoiced at cost plus markup in accordance
with the rate schedule.
• Geosyntec proposes to provide a rental/company vehicle for use by Geosyntec personnel
on site at a daily unit rate of $150. Due to recent volatility in fuels costs, the daily unit rate
for this vehicle does not include the costs of fuel and tolls.
A budget estimate for the scope of work outlined in Phases 1 through 8 of this proposal is
summarized below:
Phase 1 — General Consulting/Meeting Support/Project Management $ 36,567.24
Phase 2 — Closure Alternative Evaluation, Costing, and Selection $ 32,741.70
Phase 3 — Closure of Cell 1/2 $122,166.02
Phase 4 — FDEP Engagement and Permit Modification $ 59,484.34
Phase 5 — Assessment of Existing GCCS $ 85,071.79
Phase 6 — Wellfield Evaluation $ 43,888.84
Phase 7 — Future Wellfield Expansion Evaluation $ 24,253.30
Phase 8 — Miscellaneous Engineering Support Services $ 11,866.25
TOTAL $416,039.48
Geosyntec will not exceed the budget estimate without prior approval and written authorization
from SWDD.
NCP2525235\IRC Partial Closure & GCCS Evaluation
engineers I scientists I innovators
Mr. Himanshu Mehta, P. E.
21 November 2025
Page 10
CLOSURE
Geosyntec appreciates this opportunity to offer our services to IRC. If this proposal is acceptable,
please indicate your agreement by signing the attached work authorization, which references this
proposal. Please return one signed work authorization to Dr. Timothy Copeland's attention.
Please call the undersigned with questions you may have as you review this proposal.
Craig R. Browne, P.E.(FL)
Principal
NCP2525235\IRC Partial Closure & GCCS Evaluation
engineers I scientists I innovators
Sincerely,
Timothy R. Copeland, Ph.D., P.E.(FL)
Project Engineer
ATTACHMENT I
BUDGET ESTIMATE
Table 1
BUDGET ESTIMATE
PARTIAL AND TEMPORARY CLOSURE OF CELL 1/2
& GAS COLLECTION AND CONTROL SYSTEM (GCCS) EVALUATION
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY LANDFILL
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
Phase 1: General Consulting/Meeting Support/PM
ITEM
BASIS
RATE
QUANTITY
ESTIMATED
COST
A.
Professional Services
a. Senior Principal
Hr
$345.00
0
$0.00
b. Principal
Hr
$325.00
12
$3,900.00
c. Senior Professional
Hr
$300.00
86
$25;800.00
d. Project Professional
Hr
$268.00
0
$0.00
e. Professional
Hr
$239.00
0
$0.00
f. Senior Staff Professional
Hr
$210.00
16
$3,360.00
g. Staff Professional
Hr
$185.00
0
$0.00
Subtotal Professional Services
$33,060.00
B.
Technical/Administrative Services
a. Site Manager/Construction Manager
Hr
$174.00
0
$0.00
b. Senior Engineering Technician
Hr
$120.00
0
$0.00
c. Engineering Technician
Hr
$100.00
0
$0.00
d. Senior Designer
Hr
$225.00
0
$0.00
e. Designer
Hr
$190.00
0
$0.00
f. Senior Drafter/Senior CADD Operator
Hr
$175.00
0
$0.00
q. Project Administrator
Hr
$104.00
12
$1.248.00
h. Clerical
Hr
$84.00
0
$0.00
Subtotal Technical/Administrative
Services
$1,248.00
C.
Indirect Expenses
a. Subcontractor Services
Each
$0.00 1
1.12
$0.00
Subcontractor Services
$0.00
D.
Direct Expenses
a. Lodging
Da
$150.00
0
$0.00
b. Per Diem
Da
$55.00
6
$330.00
c. Communications Fee
3% Labor
3%
$34,308
$1,029.24
d. CADD Computer System
Hr
$15.00
0
$0.00
e. Vehicle Rental & Fuel
Da
$150.00
6
$900.00
f. 8"x11" Photocopies
Each
$0.09
0
$0.00
g. CADD Drawings
Each
$3.00
0
$0.00
Subtotal Reimbursables
$2,259.24
TOTAL ESTIMATED BUDGET: PHASE 1
$36,567.24
Table 2
BUDGET ESTIMATE
PARTIAL AND TEMPORARY CLOSURE OF CELL 1/2
& GAS COLLECTION AND CONTROL SYSTEM (GCCS) EVALUATION
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY LANDFILL
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
Phase 2: Closure Alernative Evaluation, Costing, and Selection
ITEM
BASIS
RATE
QUANTITY
ESTIMATED
COST
A.
Professional Services
a. Senior Principal
Hr
$345.00
6
$2,070.00
b. Principal
Hr
$325.00
24
$7,800.00
c. Senior Professional
Hr
$300.00
36
$10.800.00
d. Project Professional
Hr
$268.00
40
$10,720.00
e. Professional
Hr
8239.00
0
$0.00
f. Senior Staff Professional
Hr
$210.00
0
$0.00
g. Staff Professional
Hr
$185.00
0
$0.00
Subtotal Professional Services
$31,390.00
B.
Technical/Administrative Services
a. Site Manager/Construction Manager
Hr
$174.00
0
$0.00
b. Senior Engineering Technician
Hr
$120.00
0
$0.00
c. Engineering Technician
Hr
$100.00
0
$0.00
d. Senior Designer
Hr
$225.00
0
$0.00
e. Designer
Hr
$190.00
0
$0.00
f. Senior Drafter/Senior CADD Operator Hr
$175.00
0
$0.00
g. Project Administrator
Hr
$104.00
0
$0.00
h. Clerical
Hr
$84.00
0
$0.00
Subtotal Technical/Administrative Services
$0.00
C.
Indirect Expenses
a. Subcontractor Services
Each
$0.00 1
1.12
$0.00
Subcontractor Services
$0.00
D.
Direct Expenses
a. Lodging
Da
$150.00
0
$0.00
b. Per Diem
Da
$55.00
2
$110.00
c. Communications Fee
3% Labor
3%
$31.390
$941.70
d. CADD Computer System
Hr
$15.00
0
$0.00
e. Vehicle Rental & Fuel
Da
$150.00
2
$300.00
f. 8"x11" Photocopies
Each
$0.09
0
$0.00
g.CADD Drawings
Each
$3.00
0
$0.00
Subtotal Reimbursables
$1,351.70
TOTAL ESTIMATED BUDGET: PHASE 2
32 741.70
Table 3
BUDGET ESTIMATE
PARTIAL AND TEMPORARY CLOSURE OF CELL 1/2
& GAS COLLECTION AND CONTROL SYSTEM (GCCS) EVALUATION
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY LANDFILL
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
Phase 3: Closure of Cell 1/2
ITEM
BASIS
RATE
QUANTITY
ESTIMATED
COST
A.
Professional Services
a. Senior Principal
Hr
$345.00
12
$4,140.00
b. Principal
Hr
$325.00
30
$9,750.00
c. Senior Professional
Hr
$300.00
68
$20,400.00
d. Project Professional
Hr
$268.00
44
$11.792.00
e. Professional
Hr
$239.00
108
$25,812.00
f. Senior Staff Professional
Hr
$210.00
44
$9,240.00
g. Staff Professional
Hr
$185.00
0
$0.00
Subtotal Professional Services
$81,134.00
B.
Technical/Administrative Services
a. Site Manager/Construction Manager
Hr
$174.00
0
$0.00
b. Senior Engineering Technician
Hr
$120.00
0
$0.00
c. Engineering Technician
Hr
$100.00
0
$0.00
d. Senior Designer
Hr
$225.00
136
$30.600.00
e. Designer
Hr
$190.00
0
$0.00
f. Senior Drafter/Senior CADD Operator
Hr
$175.00
0
$0.00
q. Project Administrator
Hr
$104.00
0
$0.00
h. Clerical
Hr
$84.00
0
$0.00
Subtotal Technical/Administrative Services
$30,600.00
C.
Indirect Expenses
a. Subcontractor Services(Peavey)
Each
1 $4,500.00 1
1.12
$5,040.00
Subcontractor Services
$5,040.00
D.
Direct Expenses
a. Lodging
Da
$150.00
0
$0.00
b. Per Diem
Da
$55.00
0
$0.00
c. Communications Fee
3% Labor
3%
$111,734
$3.352.02
d. CADD Computer System
Hr
$15.00
136
$2.040.00
e. Vehicle Rental & Fuel
Da
$150.00
0
$0.00
f. 8"x11" Photocopies
Each
$0.09
0
$0.00
g. CADD Drawings
Each
$3.00
0
$0.00
Subtotal Reimbursables
$5,392.02
TOTAL ESTIMATED BUDGET: PHASE 3
$122,166.02
Table 4
BUDGET ESTIMATE
PARTIAL AND TEMPORARY CLOSURE OF CELL 1/2
& GAS COLLECTION AND CONTROL SYSTEM (GCCS) EVALUATION
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY LANDFILL
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
Phase 4: FDEP Engagement and Permit Modification
ITEM
BASIS
RATE
QUANTITY
ESTIMATED
COST
A.
Professional Services
a. Senior Principal
Hr
$345.00
8
$2,760.00
b. Principal
Hr
$325.00
34
$11,050.00
c. Senior Professional
Hr
$300.00
16
$4,800.00
d. Project Professional
Hr
$268.00
36
$9.648.00
e. Professional
Hr
$239.00
0
$0.00
f. Senior Staff Professional
Hr
$210.00
72
$15,120.00
g. Staff Professional
Hr
$185.00
0
$0.00
Subtotal Professional Services
$43,378.00
B.
Technical/Administrative Services
a. Site Manager/Construction Manager Hr
$174.00
0
$0.00
b. Senior Engineering Technician
Hr
$120.00
0
$0.00
c. Engineering Technician
Hr
$100.00
0
$0.00
d. Senior Designer
Hr
$225.00
60
$13.500.00
e. Designer
Hr
$190.00
0
$0.00
f. Senior Drafter/Senior CADD Operator
Hr
$175.00
0
$0.00
g. Project Administrator
Hr
$104.00
0
$0.00
h. Clerical
Hr
$84.00
0
$0.00
Subtotal Technical/Administrative
Services
$13,500.00
C.
Indirect Expenses
a. Subcontractor Services
J Each 1
$0.00 1
1.12
$0.00
Subcontractor Services
$0.00
D.
Direct Expenses
a. Lodging
Da
$150.00
0
$0.00
b. Per Diem
Da
$55.00
0
$0.00
c. Communications Fee
3% Labor
3%
$56,878
$1,706.34
d. CADD Computer System
Hr
$15.00
60
$900.00
e. Vehicle Rental & Fuel
Da
$150.00
0
$0.00
f. 8"x11" Photocopies
Each
$0.09
0
$0.00
g. CADD Drawings
Each
$3.00
0
$0.00
Subtotal Reimbursables
$2,606.34
TOTAL ESTIMATED BUDGET: PHASE 4
$59,484.34
Table 5
BUDGET ESTIMATE
PARTIAL AND TEMPORARY CLOSURE OF CELL 1/2
& GAS COLLECTION AND CONTROL SYSTEM (GCCS) EVALUATION
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY LANDFILL
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
Phase 5: Assessment of Existinq GCCS
ITEM
BASIS
RATE
QUANTITY
ESTIMATED
COST
A.
Professional Services
a. Senior Principal
Hr
$345.00
0
$0.00
b. Principal
Hr
$325.00
34
$11,050.00
c. Senior Professional
Hr
$300.00
8
$2,400.00
d. Project Professional
Hr
$268.00
0
$0.00
e. Professional
Hr
$239.00
5
$1,195.00
f. Senior Staff Professional
Hr
$210.00
16
$3,360.00
g. Staff Professional
Hr
$185.00
0
$0.00
Subtotal Professional Services
$18,005.00
B.
Technical/Administrative Services
a. Site Manager/Construction Manager
Hr
$174.00
0
$0.00
b. Senior Engineering Technician
Hr
$120.00
0
$0.00
c. Engineering Technician
Hr
$100.00
0
$0.00
d. Senior Designer
Hr
$225.00
0
$0.00
e. Designer
Hr
$190.00
0
$0.00
f. Senior Drafter/Senior CADD Operator
Hr
$175.00
0
$0.00
g. Project Administrator
Hr
$104.00
2
$208.00
h. Clerical
Hr
$84.00
0
$0.00
Subtotal
Technical/Administrative
Services
$208.00
C.
Indirect Expenses
a. Subcontractor Services (B&M)
Each
$41,882.50
1.12
$46.908.40
a. Subcontractor Services Sniffer
Each
$17,325.00
1.12
$19,404.00
Subcontractor Services
$66,312.40
D.
Direct Expenses
a. Lodging
Da
$150.00
0
$0.00
b. Per Diem
Da
$55.00
0
$0.00
c. Communications Fee
3% Labor
3%
$18,213
$546.39
d. CADD Computer System
Hr
$15.00
0
$0.00
e. Vehicle Rental & Fuel
Da
$150.00
0
$0.00
f. 8"x11" Photocopies
Each
$0.09
0
$0.00
g. CADD Drawings
Each
$3.00
0
$0.00
Subtotal Reimbursables
$546.39
TOTAL ESTIMATED BUDGET: PHASE 5
$85 071.79
Table 6
BUDGET ESTIMATE
PARTIAL AND TEMPORARY CLOSURE OF CELL 1/2
& GAS COLLECTION AND CONTROL SYSTEM (GCCS) EVALUATION
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY LANDFILL
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
Phase 6: Wellfield Evaluation
ITEM
BASIS
RATE
QUANTITY
ESTIMATED
COST
A.
Professional Services
a. Senior Principal
Hr
$345.00
0
$0.00
b. Principal
Hr
$325.00
24
$7,800.00
c. Senior Professional
Hr
$300.00
4
$1,200.00
d. Project Professional
Hr
$268.00
72
$19,296.00
e. Professional
Hr
$239.00
4
$956.00
f. Senior Staff Professional
Hr
$210.00
16
$3,360.00
g. Staff Professional
Hr
$185.00
0
$0.00
Subtotal Professional
Services
$32,612.00
B.
Technical/Administrative Services
a. Site Manager/Construction Manager Hr
$174.00
0
$0.00
b. Senior Engineering Technician
Hr
$120.00
0
$0.00
c. Engineering Technician
Hr
$100.00
0
$0.00
d. Senior Designer
Hr
$225.00
40
$9,000.00
e. Designer
Hr
$190.00
0
$0.00
f. Senior Drafter/Senior CADD Operator
Hr
$175.00
0
$0.00
g. Project Administrator
Hr
$104.00
4
$416.00
h. Clerical
Hr
$84.00
0
$0.00
Subtotal Technical/Administrative
Services
$9,416.00
C.
Indirect Expenses
a. Subcontractor Services
Each
$0.00 1
1.12
S0.00
Subcontractor Services
$0.00
D.
Direct Expenses
a. Lodging
Da
$150.00
0
$0.00
b. Per Diem
Da
$55.00
0
$0.00
c. Communications Fee
3% Labor
3%
$42.028
$1.260.84
d. CADD Computer System
Hr
$15.00
40
$600.00
e. Vehicle Rental & Fuel
Da
$150.00
0
$0.00
f. 8"x11" Photocopies
Each
$0.09
0
$0.00
g.CADD Drawings
Each
$3.00
0
$0.00
Subtotal Reimbursables
$1,860.84
TOTAL ESTIMATED BUDGET: PHASE 6
43 888.84
Table 7
BUDGET ESTIMATE
PARTIAL AND TEMPORARY CLOSURE OF CELL 1/2
& GAS COLLECTION AND CONTROL SYSTEM (GCCS) EVALUATION
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY LANDFILL
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
Phase 7: Future Wellfield Expansion Evaluation
ITEM
BASIS
RATE
QUANTITY
ESTIMATED
COST
A.
Professional Services
a. Senior Principal
Hr
$345.00
0
$0.00
b. Principal
Hr
$325.00
8
$2,600.00
c. Senior Professional
Hr
$300.00
0
$0.00
d. Project Professional
Hr
$268.00
20
$5,360.00
e. Professional
Hr
$239.00
0
$0.00
f. Senior Staff Professional
Hr
$210.00
40
$8,400.00
g. Staff Professional
Hr
$185.00
0
$0.00
Subtotal Professional Services
$16,360.00
B.
Technical/Administrative Services
a. Site Manager/Construction Manager
Hr
$174.00
0
$0.00
b. Senior Engineering Technician
Hr
$120.00
0
$0.00
c. Engineering Technician
Hr
$100.00
0
$0.00
d. Senior Designer
Hr
$225.00
30
$6.750.00
e. Designer
Hr
$190.00
0
$0.00-
f. Senior Drafter/Senior CADD Operator
Hr
$175.00
0
$0.00
g. Project Administrator
Hr
$104.00
0
$0.00
h. Clerical
Hr
$84.00
0
$0.00
Subtotal Technical/Administrative Services
$6,750.00
C.
Indirect Expenses
a. Subcontractor Services
Each
$0.00
1.12
$0.00
Subcontractor Services
$0.00
D.
Direct Expenses
a. Lodging
Da
$150.00
0
$0.00
b. Per Diem
Da
$55.00
0
$0.00
c. Communications Fee
3% Labor
3%
$23.110
$693.30
d. CADD Computer System
Hr
$15.00
30
$450.00
e. Vehicle Rental & Fuel
Da
$150.00
0
$0.00
f. 8"x11" Photocopies
Each
$0.09
0
$0.00
g. CADD Drawings
Each
$3.00
0
$0.00
Subtotal Reimbursables
$1,143.30
TOTAL ESTIMATED BUDGET: PHASE 7
$24,253.30
Table 8
BUDGET ESTIMATE
PARTIAL AND TEMPORARY CLOSURE OF CELL 1/2
& GAS COLLECTION AND CONTROL SYSTEM (GCCS) EVALUATION
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY LANDFILL
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
Phase 8: Miscellaneous Engineering Support Services
ITEM
BASIS
RATE
QUANTITY
ESTIMATED
COST
A.
Professional Services
a. Senior Principal
Hr
$345.00
0
$0.00
b. Principal
Hr
$325.00
5
$1,625.00
c. Senior Professional
Hr
$300.00
25
$7.500.00
d. Project Professional
Hr
$268.00
0
$0.00
e. Professional
Hr
$239.00
0
$0.00
f. Senior Staff Professional
Hr
$210.00
0
$0.00
g. Staff Professional
Hr
$185.00
0
$0.00
Subtotal Professional Services
$9,125.00
B.
Technical/Administrative Services
a. Site Manager/Construction Manager Hr
$174.00
0
$0.00
b. Senior Engineering Technician
Hr
$120.00
0
$0.00
c. Engineering Technician
Hr
$100.00
0
$0.00
d. Senior Designer
Hr
$225.00
10
$2,250.00
e. Designer
Hr
$190.00
0
$0.00
f. Senior Drafter/Senior CADD Operator
Hr
$175.00
0
$0.00
g. Project Administrator
Hr
$104.00
0
$0.00
h. Clerical
Hr
$84.00
0
$0.00
Subtotal Technical/Administrative Services
$2,250.00
C.
Indirect Expenses
a. Subcontractor Services
Each
$0.00 1
1.12
$0.00
Subcontractor Services
$0.00
D.
Direct Expenses
a. Lodging
Da
$150.00
0
$0.00
b. Per Diem
Da
$55.00
0
$0.00
c. Communications Fee
3% Labor
3%
$11.375
$341.25
d. CADD Computer System
Hr
$15.00
10
$150.00
e. Vehicle Rental & Fuel
Da
$150.00
0
$0.00
f. 8"x11" Photocopies
Each
$0.09
0
$0.00
g. CADD Drawings
Each
$3.00
0
$0.00
Subtotal Reimbursables
$491.25
TOTAL ESTIMATED BUDGET: PHASE 8$11,§6
6.25