Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout11/18/2025ti-ORIVt k BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA COMMISSION AGENDA TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 18, 2025 - 9:00 AM Commission Chambers Indian River County Administration Complex 1801 27th Street Vero Beach, Florida 32960 indianriver.gov COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Joseph Flescher, District 2 John A. Titkanich, Jr., County Administrator Deryl Loar, District 4 Jennifer W. Shuler, County Attorney Susan Adams, District 1 Ryan L. Butler, Clerk of the Circuit Court and Comptroller Joseph H. Earman, District 3 Laura Moss, District 5 1. CALL TO ORDER 2.A. A MOMENT OF SILENT REFLECTION FOR FIRST RESPONDERS AND MEMBERS OF THE ARMED FORCES 2.11. INVOCATION Deacon Wilfred Hart, Friendship Missionary Baptist Church 3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Jennifer Shuler, County Attorney 3.A. ELECTION OF BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSION CHAIRMAN 3.11. ELECTION OF BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSION VICE CHAIRMAN 4. ADDITIONS/DELETIONS TO THE AGENDA / EMERGENCY ITEMS 5. PROCLAMATIONS and PRESENTATIONS 5.A. Presentation of Proclamation Honoring the Vero Beach Art Club & Judy Burgarella for the Mural Creation & Restoration Attachments: Indian River County Mural Proclamation 5.11. Presentation of Proclamation Honoring the Life & Legacy of Mr. Joe Idlette, Jr. Attachments: 11. 18.25 Joe Idlette II November 18, 2025 Page I of 8 5.C. Presentation of Proclamation for GIS Day as November 19, 2025 Attachments: Proclamation 5.D. Indian River Community Foundation 2025 Community Needs Update 6. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 6.A. Regular Meeting of September 09, 2025 7. INFORMATION ITEMS FROM STAFF OR COMMISSIONERS NOT REQUIRING BOARD ACTION 8. PUBLIC COMMENT: AGENDA -RELATED MATTERS (EXCEPT FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS) 9. CONSENT AGENDA 9.A. Review of the Affordable Housing Advisory Committee 2025 Incentives Review and Recommendation Report Attachments: AHAC 2025 Draft Report RESOLUTION for 2025 AHAC Report 9.B. Approval of a Public Transportation Grant Agreement (PTGA) with the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) for a Section 5311 Grant Attachments: Authorizing Resolution FDOT Public Transportation Grant Agreement 9.C. Travel Authorization for the County Attorney for Fiscal Year 2025/2026 9.D. Partial Release of Drainage Easement - 13620 Indian River Drive Attachments: Partial Release of Easement Resolution for Partial Release of Easement Exhibit "A" Sketch and Legal View of Released Easement Area Grant of Easement - ORB820 Pg2267 9.E. Change Order 1 - Work Order No. 2018029-13 - APTIM, Sector 5 Hurricanes Ian and Nicole Dune Restoration Pre -Construction and Engineering Services Attachments: Change Order No. 1 Work Order No. 2018029-13 Agreement 9.F. Purchase of Traffic Operations Division replacement maintenance sign truck for on-call purposes 9.G. Notice of Application for Indian River Lagoon National Estuary Program Grants for Various Projects November 18, 2025 Page 2 of 8 9.11. Award of Bid 2025067 for Gifford Water Tank Structural Rehabilitation Phase 2, IRCDUS Project ID 13.23.538 Attachments: Sample Agreement 9.I. AtkinsR6alis Work Order No. 10 for Sebastian Septic to Sewer Conversion Feasibility Study, IRCDUS Project ID 21.26.502 Attachments: IRC Septic To Sewer Proposal 9.1 Aviation Boulevard Extension (33rd Street to 36th Street) Corridor Study / S.C.A.L.E. Report] (IRC -1761) 9.K. Interlocal Agreement Between Indian River County and the City of Vero Beach Regarding the Maintenance of Traffic Signal Infrastructure within its Rights of Way Attachments: ILA IRC-COVB Traffic Signal Agmt-SIGNED by COVB_Sep 2025 9.L. Change Order No. 2 and Release of Retainage - Bathroom Renovations IRC Main Library and North County Library (IRC -2403 / CP -2510) Attachments: Close Out Change Order #2 Final Pay Application #6 9.M. Amendment to Add Porte Cochere for Sandridge Golf Club New Clubhouse Attachments: Porte Cochere Budget #2 10-8-2025 Change Order - Quest Contracting Sparc Design add'I sery #8 Porte Cochere Porte Cochere sketch Sparc Design Building Section 9.N. Amendment to Agreement for EDSAP (RFP 2024059) Attachments: EDSAP First Amendment 9.0. Agreement for 2025-2026 Use of Facilities as Voting Polling Location — Intergenerational Recreation Center Attachments: 25- IG Center 112B.pdf 9.P. Draft Memorandum of Agreement Between the St. John's River Water Management District and Indian River County for Coastal Habitat Rehabilitation and Restoration Attachments: Continuing Project Partnership MOA (Clean).docx 10. CONSTITUTIONAL OFFICERS and GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES 10.A. Property Appraiser Annual Fiscal Report Attachments: Property Appraiser Annual Report 9.30.2025 (1) November 18, 2025 Page 3 of 8 I.O.B. Tax Collector Annual Fiscal Report Attachments: Tax Collector Report Agenda Item FiscalYearEnd25 Combined final 10.C. Clerk of Circuit Court Annual Fiscal Report Attachments: Clerk Excess Fees FY2025 Final 10.D. Sheriff Flowers Budget Request Attachments: IRCSO Reversion letter to BOCC 24.25 rev 11. 13.25 Open POs as of 09.30.25 IRCSO Request FY26 Budget- One Time Purchases (submitted w Annual Financial Report) I.O.E. Supervisor of Elections Annual Fiscal Report Attachments: Supervisor of Election's Excess Fees 10.F. Supervisor of Elections Carpet Replacement Attachments: Flooring Proposal 11. PUBLIC ITEMS A. PUBLIC HEARINGS B. PUBLIC NOTICE ITEMS 12. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR MATTERS 12.A. Fellsmere Water Control District 13. DEPARTMENTAL MATTERS A. Building and Facilities Services B. Community Services C. Emergency Services D. Human Resources E. Information Technology F. Natural Resources 13.F.1. The Nature Conservancy Runoff to Resilience Pilot Project Attachments: Brightstorm-SWNM-Hi-res - Digital R2R Draft Letter G. Office of Management and Budget H. Parks, Recreation, and Conservation November 18, 2025 Page 4 of 8 13.H.1. Consideration of a Sale Agreement for the Purchase of the 36.99 -acre Winter Beach 73rd Site through the Environmental Lands Acquisition Bond Attachments: Attachment 1 -Winter Beach -73rd -Assessment Attachment 2 -Winter Beach -73rd -Appraisals Attachment 3 -Winter Beach 73rd - Draft 13.H.2. ELAP Ranking List of Environmental Lands Acquisition Properties for Nomination Periods 2 & 3 Attachments: Table 1 Period 2.pdf I. Planning and Development Services J. Public Works K. Sandridge Golf Club L. Utilities Services 14. COUNTY ATTORNEY MATTERS November 18, 2025 Page 5 of 8 14.A. Indian River County Committees - Annual Member Reappointments for 2026 Attachments: 251104 Committee Members Term Renewal for Jan 2026 251104 Non -Renewal Vacancies Info List - Term Exp Jan 2026 Application Renewal - LandersKenneth (ahac) Resume - Landers Kenneth Application Renewal - MorganLinda (ahac) Resume - MorganLinda Application Renewal - AdairRobertJr (aac) Resume - AdairRobertJr Application Renewal - DeVosSteve (aac) Resume - DeVosSteve Application Renewal - KochRuben (aac) Resume - KochRuben Application Renewal - TripsonCharlotte (aac) Resume - TripsonCharlotte Application Renewal - CoxDavid (bspac) Resume - CoxDavid Application Renewal - San Miguel Francisco (bspac) Resume - San Miguel Francisco Application Renewal - MorganLinda (coc) Application Renewal - Clements FrankPete (ceb) Resume - Clements Fran kPete Application Renewal - KordiakJames (ceb) Resume -KordiakJames Application Renewal - MyersDavidll (ceb) Resume - MyersDavidll Application Renewal - RigbyArdra (cdbg) Resume - RigbyArdra Application Renewal - RadeckeKathyrn Resume - RadeckeKathyrn Application Renewal - SchuhWilliam (cbaa) Resume - SchuhWilliam Application Renewal - ShortJason (cbaa) Resume - ShortJason Application Renewal - LandersKenneth (pzc) November 18, 2025 Page 6 of 8 14.B. Disposition of Calcutta Dock Property Attachments: Unit 1 Plat Unit 2 Plat 2025-11-18 Reso declaring surplus and disposition (Calcutta) (V2) ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION (filing) 2025-11-18 QC Deed to The Country Club Pointe Dock Assoc (v1) Affidavit of Publication - Country Club Pointe 15. COMMISSIONERS MATTERS A. Commissioner Joseph E. Flescher B. Commissioner Deryl Loar 15.B.1. Quarterly Updates from County Administrator & County Attorney C. Commissioner Susan Adams D. Commissioner Joseph H. Earman E. Commissioner Laura Moss 16. SPECIAL DISTRICTS AND BOARDS A. Emergency Services District B. Solid Waste Disposal District C. Environmental Control Board 17. PUBLIC COMMENT: NON -AGENDA -RELATED MATTERS 18. ADJOURNMENT November 18, 2025 Page 7 of 8 Except for those matters specifically exempted under the State Statute and Local Ordinance, the Board shall provide an opportunity for public comment prior to the undertaking by the Board of any action on the agenda, including those matters on the Consent Agenda. Public comment shall also be heard on any proposition which the Board is to take action which was either not on the Board agenda or distributed to the public prior to the commencement of the meeting. Anyone who may wish to appeal any decision which may be made at this meeting will need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made which includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal will be based. Anyone who needs a special accommodation for this meeting may contact the County's Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Coordinator at (772) 226-1223 at least 48 hours in advance of meeting. Anyone who needs special accommodation with a hearing aid for this meeting may contact the Board of County Commission Office at 772-226-1490 at least 20 hours in advance of the meeting. The full agenda is available on line at the Indian River County Website at www.indianriver.gov The full agenda is also available for review in the Board of County Commission Office, the Indian River County Main Library, and the North County Library. Commission Meetings are broadcast live on the County website under IRCTV and the Cablecast Streaming App, available for download on iOS App Store, Google Play Store, ROKU, Fire TV, and Apple TV. Rebroadcasts continuously with the following proposed schedule: Tuesday at 6:00 p.m. until Wednesday at 6.00 a.m., Wednesday at 9:00 a.m. until 5:00 p.m., Thursday at 1:00 p.m. through Friday Morning, and Saturday at 12:00 Noon to 5:00 p.m. November 18, 2025 Page 8 of 8 Indian River County, Florida * * MEMORANDUM �ORI04' File ID: 25-1034 S. VA� Indian River County Administration Complex 1801 27th Street Vero Beach, Florida 32960 indianriver.gov Type: Presentation / Proclamation Meeting Date: 11/18/2025 TO: The Honorable Board of County Commissioners THROUGH: Commission Office FROM: Ashley Brown, Commissioner Assistant, District II DATE: 10/17/2025 SUBJECT: Presentation of Proclamation Honoring the Vero Beach Art Club & Judy Burgarella for the Mural Creation & Restoration STAFF RECOMMENDATION Recommend read & present. Indian River County, Florida Page 1 of 1 Printed on 11/13/2025 powered by LegistarTPA Proclamation HONORING THE VERO BEACH ART CLUB & JUDY BURGARELLA FOR THE MURAL CREATION & RESTORATION -Whereas, the Vero Beach Art Club, a long-standing art organization with a proud tradition of service to the community, generously gifted to the community two monumental murals: The History of Indian River County and The Habitats of Vero Beach, each spanning thirty feet in length and eight feet in height, to visually record and celebrate the rich cultural and environmental heritage of our region; and -Whereas, these murals, painted by dedicated artists including Judy Burgarella, Dawn Mill, Merana Cadorette, and Christine Thomas, portray a sweeping story of our county's past—from prehistoric discoveries and native cultures to Spanish exploration, pioneer settlement, and the natural beauty of our diverse ecosystems, so that residents and visitors alike may reflect upon our history and identity; and -Whereas, over the years the murals endured damage from environmental conditions and, most recently, from Hurricane Milton in October 2024, when a tree limb broke through a window of the Vero Beach Community Center and damaged one of the Habitat panels; and Whereas, through the commitment, vision, and artistry of Judy Burgarella and fellow artists, the damaged mural was carefully restored, ensuring that these cultural treasures remain preserved for future generations to enjoy; and -Whereas, the restoration and relocation of these murals to the County Administration Building provides a lasting legacy of community pride, artistic excellence, and historical preservation, allowing residents and visitors to appreciate their beauty in a safe and prominent public setting. Now, 'therefore, be it Proclaimed by the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County, FCorida, we recognize and extend our deepest appreciation to Judy Burgarella and the contributing artists of the Vero Beach Art Club for their extraordinary dedication, talent, and generosity in creating and restoring these magnificent murals, which will continue to inspire and enrich the lives of Indian River County residents for generations to come. Adopted this 18th day of November 2025. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA Joseph E. Flescher, Chairman Deryl Loar, Vice Chairman Joseph H. Earman Susan Adams Laura Moss Indian River County, Florida *xioA * MEMORANDUM File ID: 25-1065 —5-11 Indian River County Administration Complex 1801 27th Street Vero Beach, Florida 32960 indianriver.gov Type: Presentation / Proclamation Meeting Date: 11/18/2025 TO: The Honorable Board of County Commissioners THROUGH: Commission Office FROM: Ashley Brown, Commissioner Assistant, District II DATE: 10/29/2025 SUBJECT: Presentation of Proclamation Honoring the Life & Legacy of Mr. Joe Idlette, Jr. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Recommend read & present. Indian River County, Florida Page 1 of 1 Printed on 11/13/2025 powered_* Legistarn" Proclamation HONORING THE LIFE AND LEGACY OF MR. JOE IDLETTE, JR. Whereas, the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County proudly recognizes the life and legacy of Mr. Joe Idlette, Jr., a true pioneer, civil rights advocate, and lifelong resident of Gifford whose courage and determination helped shape the history of Indian River County; and -Whereas, born the great-grandson of enslaved people and son of a Georgia sharecropper, Mr. Idlette lived a life rooted in faith, family, and the pursuit of justice, inspiring generations through his integrity, humility, and service; and -Whereas, after serving his country in the Korean War, Mr. Idlette returned home and led a courageous fight to end segregation in Indian River County schools, resulting in the peaceful desegregation of public schools in 1969, a defining moment in local history; and -Whereas, his leadership continued as the first African American elected to the Indian River County School Board, where he served twenty years advocating for educational equity, opportunity, and unity within the community; and Whereas, in recognition of his family's deep roots and enduring contributions, Vero Heritage, Inc. honored the Idlette family as the first African American recipients of the Pioneer Family Award, celebrating their hard work, faith, and community spirit; and -Whereas, Mr. Idlette's steadfast dedication, guided by his faith at Mount Zion A.M.E. Church, and his devotion to his wife Bernice and their family, leaves an enduring legacy of courage, compassion, and progress for future generations. Now, 'Pherefore, be it Proclaimed by the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County, FCorida, that we do hereby honor and celebrate the life, leadership, and legacy of Mr. Joe Idlette, Jr., whose vision and perseverance continue to inspire a stronger, more unified community. Adopted this 18th day of November 2025. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA Joseph E. Flescher, Chairman Deryl Loar, Vice Chairman Joseph H. Earman Susan Adams Laura Moss Indian River County, Florida CoA MEMORANDUM File ID: 25-1075 Type: Presentation / Proclamation TO: The Honorable Board of County Commissioners THROUGH: John Titkanich, County Administrator Erik Harvey, Information Technology Director FROM: Rachelle Benken, GIS Manager DATE: November 4, 2025 SUBJECT: GIS Day 2025 STAFF RECOMMENDATION Read & Present. Indian River County, Florida Page 1 of 1 5G Indian River County Administration Complex 1801 27th Street Vero Beach, Florida 32960 indianriver.gov Meeting Date: 11/18/2025 Printed on 11/13/2025 powered J legistarTm ProcCamatto'm RECOGNIZING NOVEMBER 19, 2025 GIS DAY -Whereas, Indian River County Board of County Commissioners recognizes that an understanding, use, and application of geospatial technology is crucial to operating our infrastructure, sustaining our natural resources, and stimulating economic growth, thus, benefitting the welfare of the public throughout the County; and -Whereas, geographic information systems (GIS) technology allows us to see and model complex relationships and patterns to more intelligently respond; and -Whereas, there is a need to promote GIS awareness, education and technical training to use this rapidly developing technology to its full potential; and -Whereas, The Board acknowledges those that have chosen GIS as their profession or as part of their discipline to improve the lives of our citizens; and -Whereas, to recognize and support the efforts of nonprofits who work on activities to improve conservation, human services, and various humanitarian efforts to better our world; and -Whereas, having a day of GIS activities open to students, citizens, and government leaders will help promote STEM education and inspire others to a higher calling to use technology for good; and -Whereas, The Board is committed to utilizing GIS to inform decision making and better serve its residents and make useful geographic information open and easily available to the public, as a platform for innovation. Wow,'Pherefore, be it Proclaimed by the Board of County Commissioners ofIndian River County, ,Florida, that November 19, 2025 shall be recognized as GIS Day in Indian River County. Adopted this 181 day of November 2025. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA Joseph E. Flescher, Chairman Deryl Loar, Vice Chairman Joseph H. Earman Susan Adams Laura Moss _.J•1)• Indian River County Indian River County, Florida Administration Complex 1801 27th Street Vero Beach, Florida 32960 * * indianriver.gov •�A MEMORANDUM File ID: 25-1058 Type: Presentation / Proclamation Meeting Date: 11/18/2025 TO: The Honorable Board of County Commissioners THROUGH: Commission Office FROM: Ashley Brown, Commissioner Assistant, District II DATE: 10/24/2025 SUBJECT: Indian River Community Foundation 2025 Community Needs Update STAFF RECOMMENDATION Present. Indian River County, Florida Page 1 of 1 Printed on 11/13/2025 powered I LegistarT , • G V1 � O / V � V Z LA .� o � DC t� U LLU U) � V + • G / V (6C=0 CL U LLU U) =� + 0 � + � .E_ c LO Q CO) c ° .t, _(D Z C N 7 O 0 O O '- O .c c� p y �� -0 N m.:4) N V Oo R ��, : Q 4. Zww2 N O O LO 11 C*4 76 E 0 (D Q CD (D U) -0 .> co 0 Z (D U) Z U) '0 :tf 0a) m M a) CD CD 0 L co LL 0 CL) Cl) -Of e 0 C: 0 0 `"a) LL 'E M'r 0 CD > ;> �R- TLI) CU CZ cl) - 0 C) o Do () U)E M 0) LL OL Eo r CU E 0 0- o c — CD E co . . . 004 E to E 0 N CO CU r ca c ♦� V L > V1 L _ -` -a c cu , G Z 0cu X / N `N = cu L •0 O CD Q. � C U > „ ■� M O O L L 2 O 0 2co . O J Q L 7 O o" O O O Q is � cn uj p N a� • �_ Rf -0 � U wo O Z W � /L� VJ N CO CU ca c co V1 L N U -` -a c cu , G Z '= U O U O co O N `N Ti CD Q. � � U ■� N O O L iCo \ O 0 2co ClcoN JIo t ' rl� u L 0 0 NO U) ca N I i°' CY) � � co 4- C U O : U) m U (60 L L p C > Q, c6 — O co = c II N _j II U) c a W LL L m 0 co t I LOU*) UL L Q U coii (0 i o N � +-5 0 O � cn to W • Q 2 } CD. -0 _a cu D o CO° �_0 t Q Y J � W Z o CD Lcu cu C/) O cn U �0 a N 0 N_I U) N I CY) o N O 0 m U L U) � cn co = c II N CO II U) U 0 co t I LOU*) UL L Q U E L (0 u) N � O � W • • 2 } • • ZoN Q mm LM r R� a -a. L }•�� o%0.0, :.o o � > w � _ V! a a� U c o i t a EE 06 9 a r— LL i C Q� k'L r— > Co O Q Z U) m co ry�� co U U G O� U Co CO -0 - L Oaf > > m U)i -0 (D'> O� QQ U O N\ � 0Q 0 —_ k'L r— > 1_O ' Ua E C —z a U� �O fn O� L Oaf c0� U -0 (D'> O� � N\ N �� U 00 s t6 4-- �� CO (n � U) c: D C u) ca L c �� 5 O LL o> o O O � Ch Q *'' i (� -O Q .� N O O -- rl_ Q LO • . 0 _;E a a E U:: 'I 1 j L o � o LV _0o L D o CB L y N U) _ U ,�d� +� L CII LI-- C N O m L O "O n V 0� 0 L' v F— W tm ■i T L ■— � —}1 ■ E 0 0 L a0 O C N 0- O cn (a N U -C O cmmCD E C C •— i, RE U O (p C "O cu E O� o LM'_ CU cu U "p N O co c �C) NO'�O(n U) �N Q..!= N� Wa ° -a ■ E 0-0 0 i W CO C •— •- i L lot � 0 00 00. V 0 0- O O (li cu co �'c > N � �. U "p C o a U) c Wa ° -a >, O O D J U 0) W (a U Q E fl.. p Q >+c 0 N N O) C C caco cu > O Z) co 0 c a C� H� J ALL > 'D W 13 E o L AWdi L L WE Cu to a =3 O 0 lux I 4-1 > 'D W E o AWdi L L Z v =3 r^�r VJ O cn 4-1 c o cn CD r_ a) N �_ O p N N m = cn O o V E o AWdi L L Z v =3 75 4-1 > o cn cn — cn N �_ p p N N ■� O,oJ LCo�o� V AWdi L L ca .� = U N L L. O,oJ LCo�o� �. (15.2 d .2 (B E cn 3 _ U OU O _ E = cn O U N Q EO co m 0 N O c E C as a O L t-- 0 0 0 0 'mL d M rl Ln 4-1 .�; = M (,c,0000 `n NO M u • M U ... oi 00 � � NOT, N o o Ln Ln (6 z v L � E z in tn -ch tn tn- ch to II II cu o C: N z II r � II E V � v � Q3 GAJ � > NCL X ° O U m w O (D > c W co ca H cc - a a H v 'L 4-1 .�; = a vZj NO u • M U ... oi 00 � _am O O m to n� W o 0) O LL U- NOT, N o o Ln Ln (6 z v L � E z o N ba... 00 e -i LA Vl- cu v 4-1 .�; a vZj Qj cu z V � v � Q3 v � L�,, a ° a ' v cc - a a 4 -1 i O c O 3 3 3 _ ..�� ml..�m..a-. SaA�aa. m..•_ - 4' il��tiA15,1'm11 \II \[ iiby i1:i[:I:i'i� c� CORBETT FOUNDATION TRUST -BASED PHILANTHROPY IIIAN RI EEP. COMMUNITY F O U N D A T I O N Sponsored By: UNITED WAY �W Indian River County I.6 BACAGROU11- L In 2019, major funding organizations, do- y nor groups, local government, and com- munity leaders came together to assess the needs of Indian River County residents. This was the culmination of a 12 -month effort that involved an independent research con- sultant, 6 community funders, 50 local chari- ties,12 in-depth focus groups and more than 1,400 survey respondents who answered in English, Spanish, and Creole.AWN - sa n A comprehensive report was published in 2020 along with f an executive summary that found: • A growing, aging, and diversifying Indian River County popu- lation. • Increasing poverty and financial instability among Indian River A growing, .• • County households. diversifying population. • Hopeful improvements in infant and maternal health, access to medical health services, kindergarten readiness, grade level reading, and high school graduation. Senior Resource Association, School District of Indian River • Persistent problems including healthcare affordability, access County, and Treasure Coast Homeless Services, Council. In ad- dition,Thrive assessed community needs related to the specific to dental and behavioral health services, educational achieve- issues of opioid and substance use. ment among minorities, risky behaviors among teenagers, In an effort to provide a simple, one-stop resource for isolation and food insecurity among seniors, a lack of living community stakeholders to access community needs data wage jobs, housing affordability, and homelessness. and monitor trends, in 2021 Indian River Community Founda- Between 2020 and 2025, several additional needs as- tion developed and launched Indian River Indicators (www. sessments or surveys were conducted by various community irindicators.org). This community needs database is updated organizations to meet statutory requirements related to specific regularly as new information becomes available to help track demographic populations such as children or seniors, or key measures of community health and prosperity. It is used by specific fields of interest such as health, education, or housing government agencies, business owners, philanthropists, and associated with each organization. This also includes Indian nonprofit charitable organizations to understand challenges River County Children's Services Advisory Council, Indian River and allocate resources for near-term community improvements County Hospital District, Cleveland Clinic Indian River Hospital, and long-term solutions. COMMUNITY NEEDS IN 2025 Methodology. This report includes findings from two perception surveys of a representative sample of.lndian River County residents that. were conducted by Clearview Research in January and February ," 4 2025. The first survey was sponsored by the Indian River County f Hospital District and focused gmhealthcare needs.Thesecond survey was sponsored by Indian River Community Foundation, United Way of Indian River County, and the Corbett Foundation and focused on general community needs. The report alsosum=. marizes the collection and analysis of comparative data related to indicators of community health and well-being from 2010 to present. Further data support and. analysis was provided by the School District of Indian River County.and.the Community Foundations professional staff using publicly availablesources. - (A complete set of data sources is available upon request.).... i i General Results The results of both perception surveys indicate that two-. thirds.of respondents believe the quality of life in,Indian River:, County is headed in the right direction, including the quality of . healthcare services. Despite relatively high satisfaction overall, specific areas of concern include the following: • Healthcare access and affordability,:especiallyamong target • • • - • • • - subgroups such as lower-income families, women under 50, • _ and parents with children living at home: • • •Quality childcare and early childhood education access and .•-• - . • • affordability. • • :Low wages and transportation to travel to and from and main- tain,good paying jobs. "A" rating for three c nsecutiveY ears, ranks 5th among Florida's • Housing affordability.67 school districts.- and whose chief executive was named the • Public. safety, specifically concerns of Black residents about 2025 Florida Superintendent of the Year. Violent crime, and concerns:of residents overall about infra- Housing Affordability structure related to traffic a.nd pedestrian safety.:Concerns about. housing affordability-were high among sur- outler` Observations vey respondents, while-data about-homelessness was conflict- ing. On one:hand, the number of homeless people recorded _. Infant and Maternal Health in an-annual "point in time" survey required-by the United States One specific area that received additional attention follow- Department of Hauling and Urban Development was:thelow- ing the completion of the two perception surveys described The number of stu- est since the :count began. On the other hand,the above isinfant and maternal health. After three town halls and a third perception survey sponsored by the Indian River County dent's iden�ed and . number of students identi= . .: Hospital District in August 2025, an overwhelming majority ofwqmriW as haw h0 ng 111@!- fieri and reported as having P . :experienced homelessness respondents emphasized maternity services as a necessity for public health and safety and as an essential component of the Weft@ at •ny°rime 'at any time during the *Coup 's overall well-being. Strong support *County's g.. g pport was expressedfor duri _ dw :: wil r. � sch:ool:year was the highest the use of taxpayer funds for this purpose... highest et`. VMS ge evecTtiis contrast may re- K-12 Education f e' ct the combined effects ofthe recently enacted HB 1365 prohibiting homeless.people One specific area where negative survey responses contrast _ from steeping outside, more intense "rapid=rehousing".- efforts with positive performance data highlighted in the "Trends"., by theTreasure Coast Homeless Services Council (especially section of this report is K-12 public education, While approx- those focused on helping: homeless veterans:and those who are imately two-thirds of respondents were satisfied with.K 12 chronically mentally ill), changes in local eviction'laws, and the. public education, one-third were unsatisfied. These"unsatisfied .: . resilience and resourcefulness of families in preventing children perceptions are irra public school district that has earned an from experiencing long episodes of homelessness. 1. TRENDS op,:, u a ton- >ren s .. Indian River County's population continueslto grow and is otaIN a roachin 170,000 residents, 48 ercent whichae pp. - 9 p . ,. rmale and 52 percent are:female. :. • Seniors continue to represent the fastest.groWing age de no - :graphic as:34 percent of the population are adults age 65 and over, -two times the percentage of seniors in the.Unked States " ` .. overall.poll • :Children and youth under age 18 rnake up 15;percent;of the , ,- population; one-third lower than the United States overall. • Whites makeu ..the largest merit of the opulation at 73 p g g p . ulat I I ' percent, followed b Hispanics at 13 ercent) y p p 'and Blacks at 8 percent. Hispanics representthe fastest growling race/ethnic- • - people • • '� regular -•Check-ups. :.. • County residents (17%) and .:: Indian River Coun has more disabled more veterans (10%) than other counties in FI rida. .The average life expectancY:of County reside is is 79 years doctors, nurses, physical therapists; social workers, and other medical professionals. Indian River County 14th out of of age, among the highest irk Florida, The highst life expec .' fancy (87 years) is on the barrier island in cE n s tract 505.05; 1. .ranks Florida's 67 counties for overall: health and well-being.: While the lowest (75:years) is in Gifford in census tract: 03A3. Promising .Nealtfi Indicators . • More Yearly Checkups .While uninsured residents make up. Health Trends 1T percent of the populatibr ,alightly lower than the average I Indian:River Countys:continuum of care fork alth is:com- in Florida, the percentage of residents who attend a yearly prised of two hospitals; a behavioral health cent r, two com- checkup: hats increasedto 78 percent. .. prehensive community healthcare organizationsjwith multiple.:: . Improved Healthcare Providers Ratios = Im roved rima p... .. p p. ry locations.pro ding, primary care prowderratios (826 people per. 1 doctor in 2023 vs. Ipdian khrer County'smedical care;, dental care, 1,280 to 1 in _2016), pediatriciah-ratios (574 children per 1 healtfi cars. @rrt Is . .. and behavio health care; pediatricianvs.1209to 1 in 2016)dental provider ratios �. iY rted: : more PIS' several communi mental (lA� people per 1 dentist in 2024 vs. 2;013 to 1 in 2016), and - titan lO,Oty►0 people health and sut stance abuse mental health provider ratios (817 people per 1: mental health working In the health revention an p- d recovery rowder:vs 1,495 to 1 in 2016) all contribute, along with:a. p g ' and_soeialseryiees centers; andveral senior ... strong oontinuum.of care and•the availabilityof specialtaxing . fields. servicesices prow4ars includ-. district resources.: in 9home hea h care and •Improved Infant and Maternal Health - Infant and maternal hospice. Thissystem issupported by more than:10,000:pea- health are improving overall, with infant mortality rates falling ple working in the health and social services field , including from 6 5 per 100,000 live births in 2410 -to 4.9 in 2023. One A .. of the key contributors to this improvement is the: growing .: percentage of pregnantmothers who start prenatal care in their first trimester, now at more than 70 percent. • Decreased Risky Behaviors Among Adolescents and Teenag- y ers:-Youth.alcohol, tobacco, and marijuana use have declined v by 26.percent, 12 percent, and 12 percent respectively since 2010. Arrests among youth (age 10-17) have:declined: from 43 :: : youth arrests per 1,000 youth in 2017 to 28 youth arrests per :1,000 youth. Concerning Health Indicators Potential High-Risk Pregnancies - Almost 30 percent of ....:' More • pregnant mothers still do:not receive prenatal :care in their :: graduating •school. first trimester. Part of this problem can be attributed to a high . OB-GYN: provider ratio at 6,354 womenper. l OB-GYN.as compared to Florida's average ratio of 3,919 women per 1 has more than a dozen private' schools along with several dozen OB-GYN. preschools. 6 Persistent Struggles with Mental Health = Undesired out- :0 omisi:Public Education lndinrstors comes associated with poor behavioral health or substance . ' Increased Preschool Enrollment - Preschool enrollment con- use remain a concernngarend. Diagnosis and hospitalisation rates for mood and depressive disorders among children'and i.es to increase, outpacing population growth:::: adults:have fluctuated over time, as have binge drinking and • : Improved-Reading Proficiency -: (heading proficiency of 3rd suicide rates for adults. Hospitalizations formental disorders graders has increased to 71 percent. have become the top reason for adult hospital admissions,: improved Math. Proficiency- Math proficiency of 8th graders currently .6. 0 percent hi her than.forida's average ..... has increased to 66 percent. High Food Insecurity - Access. to healthy food and riutrition Record High School: Graduation - High school graduation also have become a concerning trend, Seventy-two percent has increased to:96 percent overall. Graduation rates among of households with children in poverty do not receive SNAP: white(97%),:Black(92%),:Hispanic:(97%) Asian (100%), and benefits, and more than 50 percent of all seniors live a mile or 'multi-racial (96%) students all exceed rates in Florida: more:away from stores that sell fresh produce. + FewerHigh School Dropouts - Approximately 1 percent of all sttdents:are. dropping out of high school, which is half:the Education Trendsrate in Florida: Indian.River County's education system is comprised of 27 Concerning Education Indicators public schools operated by the School_ District of Indian River.: •Kindergarten Readiness - 44.percent 4f students are not Couniy. These include 22non-charter schools (13 elementary prepared torstart kindergarten. schools, 4 middle schools, 2 high schools, and 3 specl(Gzed . Chronic Absenteeism:- Between the 2020-2021 and 2024- 'schools including atechnical college), and 5 charter schools. 2025 school years, an average of 32 percent of public school Six elementary schools have early learning programs (VPK) :. students were:absent 1Q percent orrrtore of the school days designed to, prepare children for kindergarten, The county also in a year. TRENDS Economic Opportunity Trends Indian River County is a coastal resort and rural community where agriculture and tourism have historically beenthe largest' industries. Today, more than 65,000 people are employed :within the top: industries of health care and social assistance:: (9,700), retail trade (i3,300),:professional; scientific, and techni- cal services (6,000), construction (5,300), restaurants:and food services (4;300), and education (3,000). The top: employers are a' Cleveland Clinic Indian River Hospital, School District of -Indian River County, Indian River County Govemrrient, Publix Super-: _ markets; and Piper Aircraft.. Approximately 10 percent of all , jobs are in nonprofit corporations, the majority:of which are IRS 4 501(c)(3).:public charities: - -- — - Promising Economic Opportuniity Indicators •: Rising Median Household Income = Median household ... More people live in poverty income has continued to rise over time, now at $72,0,00 per or • - paycheck away from year,: Finance and insurance jobs are the highest paid aver-: aging $132,000 per year, while accommodation and food.: services are the lowest paid at$28,000 peryear. Promising Housing Indicators:,: Concerning Economic Opportunity Indicators Lower Record of Homelessness -The 2025 Point in Tirrie • More People in Poverty - While the overall percentage of : courit:conducted by Treasure Coast Homeless Services Coumw the population living in povertyhas:remained. at 11 percent, cilreported a 19 percent decrease inahe number of homeless the total number of people living in poverty has increased by individuals from the prior year, and a.15 percent decrease 27 percent. There are more women living in poverty in the . in the number of "doubled up" individuals (i.e. temporarily community than men. Black residents represent the highest staying with family or friends due to economic reasons) from race/ethnicitysegment of all eo le living to ove at 30 9 p P 9� P rty. the prior year. The 2025.effort recorded the. lowest number of pe.rcent, and 58 percent of eo le living.in ove rtyare mar. -. homeless individualssince the 'PIT count's inception. ried couples with. children.:. • Reduced Domestic:Violence =The total reported domestic • Growing ALICE Population - Otherwise knownas the working violence.related offensesare at an allotime low, down from . poor, 30 percent of the adult population fitthe United Way of 1;366 per 100,000 in 2010 to 164 per 100,00Q today. Indian River County criteria as' "Asset -Limited, Income -Con- Concerning Housing Indicators strained, and Employed:' • Children's Horrielessness .-While the .2025 Point.inTime count • Too Many: Economically; Disadvantaged Students - Econom- conducted byTreasure:Coast Homeless Services Council re- ically disadvantaged students make up 53 percent of the ported a decline in the numberof homeless children, the num- student population, compared to 46 percent in: Florida. ber of students. identified and- reported as:having-experienced • Low -Wages - It takes a living wage, of at least $64,000 for a homelessness°at any point d6ring.the°2024-2025 school.year family of four to survive in our community, while the average (n=655) Increased by 15 percent.over the prior year and. by 55 annual -wage is $58,000, which is 19 percent lower than Flori- ..:` percentsince the. 2020-2021 school year..: da% average wage. Women earn an average of $.0.75 for every:• More:Evictions:=Since 2020; the eviction: rate has:increased $1.00 earned by men. Black workers earn an average of $0:48 by 38 percent. for every $1.00 earned by white workers. .Excessive Home Ownership Costs = Since. -2020, the median • Unemployment - 4.7 percent of the population: are. unem- estirnated residential property value has:increased by30 ployed, compared with 3.7 percent of Florida's population,..= percent: Twenty-three percentof homeowners are paying 30 percent or more f income for housing expenses 0 Housing Trends ... • Excessive Renting Costs -.Since 2020,.fair market rent has Affordable housing is getting harder:to:find in Indian River ... : increased by 54 percent. More than 50 percent of renters County. The most adverse outcome of this problem is home= are paying 30 percent or.more of their income for housing Iessness. To understand this issue, it helps to have some knowl- q expenses. : edge of our community's housing continuum which ranges • Senior. Isolation = approximately 13,000aeniors live. atone, from emergency shelter to transitional housing to, community .: : with 1 out of 4.livirig in poverty: This increases the chances of housing to:affordable rental housing to market.rental housing to poor health: that can lead:to loss of independence, hospital affordable home ownership to market home ownership. nation, or accidental death. .OBSERVATIONS AND RECOM�IE�IDATI4NS This report is intended to:provide a snapshot of current :: and anticipated conditions reflecting the overall health and well-being of the Indian River County community. It provides an opportunity for community leaders to engage in activities that promote abetter community overall. There is, however; no single solution. The report documents hard-eamed progress in our commu- nity's overall health and well-being made possible, in part, by V substantial contributions from government, private: enterprise,:: and the nonprofit sector. Prosperity for all, however, remains elusive. = Employing a Solutions -Oriented : Framework for Community Leadership however, Indian Riyer County's quality of life depends on an The indicators highlighted in this report provide an oppor- unusually high level of household givingby generous donors tunity for stakeholders engaged in related work to reflect and and philanthropists to supplement public dollars allocated to consider where to focus resources. Our approach to building a addressing communityneeds. Lastyear, contrutions:from better community encourages stakeholders to practice effec-: donors made up 41 percent of the $384 million in revenue , collected by Indian River County's top 200 501(c)(3): nonprofit five leadership by.championing orperticipating insolation -ori- . charities, followed by:39 percent from earned income,15 per- ented efforts to: .-centfromgovernment, and 5 percent frons investments,When • Review additional data -What information is needed or problems arise, generous donors will likely continueto respond : requires clarification to have a betterunderstanding of pion= to appeals forhelp in core areas of health, education, econom- lems and.concerns? is opportunity, and: housing. Despite this hopeful source of • Commission additional research - What new challenges or support; philanthropy isnot an adequate replacement for persistent problems need to be studied to provide a deeper: efficiencv and reliiabilitythat public dollars proviideto operate: understanding of the issue and possible solutions? systems that so many Indian River County residents depend on. • Engage community residents - Who is missing from the con- versation that might offer a different perspective or buy -in? Encouraging (i1V1C Engagement • Work across sectors - When does.a problem require multiple Indian River County recently celebrated its Centennial. It is stakeholders to bring about change? .hard to.imagine the dedication required byearly settlers to start • Marshal resources- What sources of funding need to be the processof turning a hot, huMid, sandy;mosquito-infested preserved or increased to support and sustain meaningful :.: place into the county it has become::: -: solutions? What opportunities exist to bring new capital into If we look at the last 10years of Indian River County's history the community? alone, there. are plenty of examplesof the Impact of civic • Shape public policy - What changes are required to ensure '. engagement A community hospital was saved- A public school .: government resources areI aligned with the most effective : districtwas turned around. Dozens more acres of shoreline solutions; or that government regulations (or the lack thereof) have been preserved to protect the Indian River Lagoon. Arts create opportunity for the health and prosperity of:all resi- and cultural: institution ire thriving and reaching a broader dents? audience. Tfiere,are many more: During this same periodMowever; the community's strong: Preserving .a Balance Between Public tradition of civic engagement frayed. Despite national and Private Financial Resources recognition of excellence for Indian River County's Supervisor .. of Elections office- voter turnout has.ebbed and flowed. Ballot Ina postCOVID-19 era:with continued reductions in federal measures to sustain critical programrriing for local children . and state financing, local taxpayers and philanthropicsupport have failed. Mandates imposing costly requirements for septic will be needed to maintain progress and bring about positive to sewerconversions by homeowners have gone unfunded. change. With one of the lowest tax rates in Florida.a' d one : Iconic -servant leaders like Dari Richardson and Alma Lee Loy of the highest rates of household giving in the.country, Indian have: passed away. River County residents have practiced fiscal responsibility There are plenty of community needs that cannot bead - while demonstrating maximum generosity in service of a better dressed by one person: alone. Whatever inspires you to give or community. get involved :.:.give ...get involved. The,future. of this Indian Unlike many rural communities throughout the country, River Countycorhmunity depends on it. For more information or to receive additional copies of this report: Please contact Indian River Community Foundation at 772.492.1407 or visit www.ircommunityfoundation.org. I Indian River County, Florida *roA * MEMORANDUM File ID: 25-1096 Type: Minutes TO: The Honorable Board of County Commissioners THROUGH: Clerk to the Board FROM: Shauna James, Recording Secretary DATE: November 06, 2025 SUBJECT: Regular Meeting Minutes of September 09, 2025 STAFF RECOMMENDATION Approve 6114, Indian River County Administration Complex 1801 27th Street Vero Beach, Florida 32960 indianriver.gov Meeting Date: 11/18/2025 Indian River County, Florida Page 1 of 1 Printed on 11/13/2025 powered 9V Legistarrm Indian River County, Florida * * MEMORANDUM �RIpA /. r \ Indian River County Administration Complex 1801 27th Street Vero Beach, Florida 32960 indianriver.gov File ID: 25-1053 Type: Consent Staff Report Meeting Date: 11/18/2025 TO: Honorable Board of County Commissioners THROUGH: John A. Titkanich, Jr., County Administrator Michael C. Zito, Deputy County Administrator Cynthia Emerson, Community Services Director FROM: Siphikelelo Chinyanganya, SHIP Administrator DATE: November 18, 2025 SUBJECT: Review of the Affordable Housing Advisory Committee 2025 Incentives Review and Recommendation Report BACKGROUND As part of HB 1375, enacted in 2007, the Legislature revised section 420.9076, F.S., to require that local governments establish a local Affordable Housing Advisory Committee (AHAC). On March 18, 2008, the Indian River County Board of County Commissioners (BCC) approved Resolution 2008-038 to establish Indian River County's AHAC. According to state law, the principal responsibility of the AHAC is to submit a report to the local governing body that includes a recommendation on, or evaluation of the affordable housing incentives identified in Paragraphs A through K of Section 420.9076 (4), F.S. (see page 2 of this staff report). Consistent with the provisions of Section 420.9076 F.S. (up until the 2020 legislative session), every three years, the AHAC was required to review the local government's established policies and procedures, ordinances, land development regulations, and comprehensive plans and recommend specific actions or initiatives to encourage or facilitate affordable housing, while protecting the ability of a property to appreciate in value. Pursuant to House Bill 1339, adopted during the 2020 Florida Legislative Session, the triennial requirement changed to an annual requirement starting in 2021. The County's first AHAC report was approved by the BCC on December 9, 2008, submitted to the Florida Housing Finance Corporation (FHFC) before its December 31, 2008, due date, and thereafter approved by the FHFC. Subsequent AHAC reports were prepared, recommended for approval by AHAC, approved by the BCC, and submitted to the FHFC in 2011, 2014, 2017, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023 and 2024. The County's next AHAC report is due to the state by December 31, 2025. To meet that deadline, staff have prepared the 2025 incentives review and recommendations report for AHAC's consideration. ANALYSIS Section 420.9076 (4) F.S. requires that, at a minimum, the advisory committee (AHAC) submit a report to the local governing body (BCC) that includes recommendations on affordable housing incentives in the following Indian River County, Florida Page 1 of 3 Printed on 11/13/2025 powered 0( Legistar"" areas: a. The processing of approvals of development orders or permits, as defined in F. S. 163.3164(7) and (8), for affordable housing projects are expedited to a greater degree than other projects. b. All allowable fee waivers are provided for the development or construction of affordable housing. C. The allowance of flexibility in densities for affordable housing. d. The reservation of infrastructure capacity for housing for very low-income, low-income, and moderate -income. e. Affordable accessory residential units. f. The reduction of parking and setback requirements for affordable housing. g. The allowance of flexible lot configuration, including zero -lot -line configurations for affordable housing. h. The modification of street requirements for affordable housing. i. The establishment of a process by which a local government considers, before adoption, policies, procedures, ordinances, regulations, or plan provisions that increase the cost of housing. j. The preparation of a printed inventory of locally owned public lands suitable for affordable housing. k. The support of development near transportation hubs and major employment centers, and mixed- use developments. In 2008, 2011, 2014, 2017, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023 and 2024, the Indian River County Affordable Housing Advisory Committee reviewed Indian River County's existing affordable housing incentives, as well as new affordable housing strategies and policies. Through that process, the AHAC reached a consensus and provided directions to staff on the county's then -existing and proposed strategies and policies. By assessing the county's affordable housing incentives and strategies, the AHAC addressed the affordable housing incentives referenced in paragraphs A through K of Section 420.9076(4) F.S. For each incentive, the report included a description, reference to existing county regulations, analysis, and recommendations. All recommendations of the previous AHAC reports were incorporated into the county's Comprehensive Plan and Land Development Regulations (LDRs). Recently, staff prepared a draft 2025 AHAC report. That AHAC report is a compilation and evaluation of the county's current affordable housing incentives, the incentives referenced in Section 420.9076(4) F.S., and affordable housing strategies and policies that were adopted by the county, as part of the county's 2010 EAR - based comprehensive plan amendments, and the county's previous AHAC report. As indicated in the draft 2025 AHAC housing incentives report, the county has already adopted and implemented all but one of the affordable housing incentives identified in items A through K of Section 420.9076(4) F.S. The incentive not adopted is item H, which relates to modifying minimum street requirements. Staff analysis shows that the county's current street right-of-way requirements are appropriate to ensure public safety is not excessive and should be maintained. Staff's AHAC report analysis indicates that the county has successfully implemented incentives for providing affordable housing within the county. County affordable housing incentives have been in place for many years and have been used by not-for-profit housing organizations and for-profit affordable housing developers to provide affordable housing for county residents. At its regular meeting on October 22, 2025, the AHAC voted unanimously to recommend that the Board of County Commissioners approve the 2025 AHAC Incentives Review Report and direct staff to submit a copy of the report to the Florida Housing Finance Corporation (FHFC). BUDGETARY IMPACT Indian River County, Florida Page 2 of 3 Printed on 11/13/2025 powe10( legistar' None PREVIOUS BOARD ACTIONS Approved 11. 19.2024 POTENTIAL FUTURE BOARD ACTIONS Approval of AHAC Report Annually STRATEGIC PLAN ALIGNMENT Quality of Life OTHER PLAN ALIGNMENT Local Housing Assistance Plan - LHAP STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff and the Affordable Housing Advisory Committee recommend that the Board of County Commissioners approve the 2025 AHAC Incentives Review Report and direct staff to submit a copy of the report to the FHFC for review by December 31, 2025. Indian River County, Florida Page 3 of 3 Printed on 11/13/2025 powered ty t_egistarT Proposed Indian River County Affordable Housing Advisory Committee 2025 Incentives Review and Recommendation Report Community Services Department Indian River County 1800 27th Avenue Vero Beach, Florida 32962 (772) 226-1870 Approved by the Affordable Housing Advisory Committee at a Public Hearing on (October 22, 2025) Approved by the Board of County Commissioners "`" (November 18, 2025) 1 12 INTRODUCTION With passage of HB 1375 in 2007, local governments that receive State Housing Initiatives Partnership Program funds were required to establish an Affordable Housing Advisory Committee (AHAC) by June 1, 2008. In Indian River County, the Board of County Commissioners created an Affordable Housing Advisory Committee on March 18, 2008. Between 2008 and 2019, triennially each AHAC was required to review their local government's established policies and procedures, ordinances, land development regulations and comprehensive plan and recommend specific actions or initiatives to encourage or facilitate affordable housing, while protecting the ability of property to appreciate in value. Pursuant to House Bill 1339 adopted during the 2020 Florida Legislative Session, each AHAC must now annually complete this task. In Indian River County, the first AHAC report was approved by the Board of County Commissioners on November 19, 2008. Following submission of the initial AHAC report, reports were required to be submitted triennially on December, 31 every three years. Therefore, the subsequent AHAC reports were approved on December 6, 2011, December 9, 2014, December 5, 2017, December 1, 2020, and December 7, 2021, The next AHAC report must be submitted to the FHFC by December 31, 2025. According to Section 420.9076 (4) F.S., each AHAC report must give recommendations on affordable housing incentives in the following areas: A. The processing of approvals of development orders or permits, as defined in s. 163.3164(7) and (8) for affordable housing projects is expedited to a greater degree than other projects. B. All allowable fee waivers provided for the development or construction of affordable housing. C. The allowance of flexibility in densities for affordable housing. D. The reservation of infrastructure capacity for housing for very low-income persons, low income persons, and moderate -income persons. E. Affordable accessory residential units. F. The reduction of parking and setback requirements for affordable housing. G. The allowance of flexible lot configuration, including zero -lot -line configurations for affordable housing. H. The modification of street requirements for affordable housing. I. The establishment of a process by which a local government considers, before adoption, policies, procedures, ordinances, regulations, or plan provisions that increase the cost of housing. J. The preparation of a printed inventory of locally owned public lands suitable for affordable housing. K. The support of development near transportation hubs and major employment centers and mixed-use developments. 2 13 BACKGROUND In February, 1990, the Indian River County Board of County Commissioners adopted the Indian River County Comprehensive Plan. In the Housing Element of that plan, Policy 1.3 stated: "An advisory committee shall be appointed by the Board of County Commissioners to provide additional guidance on county housing policies. Comprised of representatives of the housing industry, financial institutions, Housing Authority, and citizens, the committee shall be advisory and terminated upon acceptance of its final report. This committee shall submit a final report to the Board of County Commissioners by 1993..." Consistent with Housing Policy 1.3, the Board of County Commissioners, on March 5, 1991, created a fifteen (15) member Indian River County Affordable Housing Advisory Committee (Resolution No. 91-29). That committee was comprised of representatives of the housing industry, financial institutions, and the Housing Authority, as well as citizens. In April 1993, the Affordable Housing Advisory Committee voted to adopt and transmit the Committee's Final Report to the Board of County Commissioners for its review and consideration. That final report was submitted to the Board of County Commissioners on May 25, 1993, and the original AHAC was then dissolved. In 1992, the Florida Legislature established the State Housing Initiatives Partnership (SHIP) program. The purpose of the SHIP program is to provide funds to local governments for the provision of affordable housing for qualifying households. In order to receive SHIP funds, the county was required to satisfy several requirements, including the creation of a Local Affordable Housing Advisory Committee to conduct a review of the county's regulations and to develop a Local Housing Incentive Plan. To obtain SHIP funds, the Board of County Commissioners adopted the Indian River County Local Housing Assistance Program (Ordinance #93-13) in April 1993. Consistent with the requirements of Section 420.9076, F.S. and Section 308.07 of the County Code, the Board of County Commissioners created the county's second Affordable Housing Advisory Committee (AHAC) in 1993. The function of that committee was to review the County's Local Housing Assistance Plan and develop local housing incentive strategies. Once established, that committee worked with staff and fulfilled all of the requirements of Section 420.9076, F.S. On December 13, 1994, the Board of County Commissioners adopted the final Indian River County Affordable Housing Incentive Plan with resolution number 94-162. That plan which remains in effect includes many of the affordable housing incentives listed in paragraphs A through K of Section 420.9076(4) F.S. The second AHAC was dissolved in 2001. Since adoption of the affordable Housing Incentive Plan, the county's affordable housing incentives have been utilized by for-profit and non-profit housing developers and organizations to provide affordable housing within the county. Through those incentives, 2,634 affordable rental housing units have been constructed. Also, 1,698 income eligible 3 14 individuals have received SHIP and HHR funds for the purchase of a home and/or for rehabilitation of their housing unit. Consistent with the 2007 legislature's directive, Indian River County established its Affordable Housing Advisory Committee in March 2008 and, in December 2019, updated its membership composition consistent with state statute. The primary function of the AHAC is to prepare an update on the County's Local Housing Incentives Report. In 2008, 2011, 2014, 2017, 2020, and annually from 2021— 2024, the AHAC prepared the County's update. This is the tenth Local Housing Incentives Report update. Beginning in December 2018 and concluding in early 2020, the BCC directed the AHAC to study the affordable housing issue outside of the county's normal three-year window to update its incentives and recommendations report. That directive included the request to review the county's existing local affordable housing incentives and programs and County regulations impacting and encouraging the development of more affordable housing to develop recommendations for improvement. This AHAC report incorporates many of the AHAC's recent findings and recommendations adopted by the AHAC, on January 22, 2020, and those ultimately approved by the BCC on February 18, 2020. - ANALYSIS In this section, each of the Chapter 420.9076(4), F.S. requirements, A through K, are addressed. For each of the requirements, current citations from the county's Comprehensive Plan and Land Dev, mRegulations (LDRs) are provided. Each section also include . sis and r �ent daU , A.The process of approvals of development orders or permits, as defined in s.163.3164(7) and (8), for affordable housing projects is expedited to a greater degree than other projects. Section 163.3164(7), F.S. defines a development order as "any order granting, denying, or granting with conditions an application for a development permit." Section 163.3164(8), F.S. defines a development permit to "include any building permit, zoning permit, subdivision approval, rezoning, certification, special exception, variance, or any other official action of local government having the effect of permitting the development of land". In Indian River County, permits for affordable housing projects are expedited to a greater degree than other projects. Established policies and procedures ° for expedited permitting are found in Policies 1.5 and 1.6 of the Housing Element. These policies read as follows: POLICY 1.5: By 2015, the county shall establish a web -based permitting process. POLICY 1.6: The county shall take all necessary steps to eliminate delays in the review of affordable housing development projects. In order to define delay, the county hereby establishes the following maximum timeframes for approval ofprojects when an applicantprovides needed information in a timely manner: - Administrative approval — 5 days; - Minor site plan — 5 weeks; - Major site plan — 6 weeks; - Special exception approval —13 weeks Whenever these review times increase by 150% or more due to the workload of review staff, the county will begin prioritizing the review of affordable housing development project applications. In prioritizing affordable housing development project applications, staff will schedule affordable housing project applications for review before other types of project applications to ensure that maximum review timeframes are not exceeded for affordable housing projects. ANALYSIS: Consistent with Policy 1.6, the Community Services Department processes affordable housing projects ahead of all other projects. This has been done since 1994. For each affordable housing project application, SHIP staff notifies other reviewing departments that the application is an affordable housing project and must be reviewed ahead of all other projects. Overall, this process has worked well, with affordable housing projects identified upfront and reviewing departments expediting these project reviews. For major affordable housing projects, this process has saved applicants several weeks in application review/processing time. In 2019, after a recommendation from the AHAC, the County revised the permit expediting process further to make identification of affordable housing permits more identifiable. For hardcopy permit application submissions, the new process uses a bright neon green affordable housing permit expediting form and a similarly colored permit review folder to designate the permit as a permit that must be expedited. 5 16 More recently, in 2020, in response to the COVID-19 health crisis, the Community Development Department implemented an electronic permit e-mail application process for all building permits, and this has now become a permanent feature. While not specific to affordable housing, the electronic permit application process eliminates the time it takes to produce paper copies and have them delivered. With this process, applicants may request that the permit be expedited in the subject line of the e-mail and provide a copy of the neon green permit expediting form. RECOMMENDATION: The county should maintain Housing Element Policy 1.5, regarding web-based permitting, and Policy 1.6, regarding prioritizing the permit process review of affordable housing development projects ahead of all other projects. No other action is needed. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ACTION: Board of County Commissioners Approval 0'%Q , Yes [ ] N4JIbbQ B. All allowable fee waivers provided for the development or construction of affordable housing. Impact fees and utility capacity charges are one-time charges applied toward new construction to generate the revenue necessary to make capacity -producing capital improvements. Overall, these impact fees and utility capacity charges increase the cost of housing. Until Florida's 2019 legislative session, communities in Florida that adopted impact fees were required by statute and/or case law to apply those impact fees to all activities that create a demand for capital facilities. During the 2019 legislative session, however, Florida's Impact Fee Act was amended to allow exemptions for affordable housing (housing for households earning less than 120% of Area Median Income (AMI)). In March of 2020, with the County's most recent impact fee study and fee schedule update, Indian River County adopted a portion of the allowable affordable housing impact fee waiver/reduction allowance as part of the County's Impact Fee Regulations under Title X of the Indian River County code. Indian River County now provides: • impact fee exemptions for single-family homes of less than 1,000 square feet (under air) for households with incomes below 80% of AMI; and • impact fee reductions at 50% of the calculated rate for single-family homes between 1,000 square feet and 1,500 square feet (under air) for households with incomes below 80% of AMI. In October of 2022, the Board of County Commissioners directed County Staff to prepare a formal amendment to the County's Impact Fee Regulations `under Title X of the Indian River County code and to begin providing the following impact fee waiver/reductions per the Pending Ordinance Doctrine: • impact fee exemptions for single-family homes of less than 1,500 square (under air) for households with incomes below 80% of AMI; and • impact fee exemptions for multifamily units of less than 1,500 square feet for households with incomes below 80% AMI Impact fees for single-family homes of any square footage larger than 1,500 square feet (under air) and impact fees for homes of less than 1,500 square feet (under air) not occupied by households with household incomes of less than 80% of AMI continue to be collected at the full calculated and adopted rates with no affordable housing reduction or waiver. Currently, Indian River 'County provides SHIP program loans and grants of up to $20,000.00 per unit to income -eligible households for the cost of impact fees and utility capacity charges for new units. The county also provides SHIP loans and grants for existing units to connect to the county's regional water and wastewater system. To obtain SHIP impact fee funds, applicants must execute loan or grant agreements with the county, indicating that they will comply with the county's Local Housing Assistance Program's requirements. Those loans or grants are limited to income -eligible households in the Very low Income (VLI) (not to exceed 50% of the county's median income), Low Income (LI) (51-80% of the county's median income), and moderate -income (MI) (between 81-120% of the county's median income) categories. 7 18 Besides providing impact fee loans and grants, the county also provides financing of water and sewer capacity charges for new units and existing units connecting to the county regional system. The following policies from the Housing Element of the Comprehensive Plan provide for financial assistance for payment of impact fees and connection charges for affordable housing units. POLICY 4.3: The county shall maintain its current policy of financing water and sewer capacity charges for newly constructed housing units. POLICY 4.4: The County shall maintain its Housing Trust Fund, which provides below-market interest rate financing and/or grants for land acquisition, downpaymendclosing cost loans, impact fee%apacity charges payment loans, and rehabilitation loans for affordable housing units in the county. The fund will also assist non-profit facilitators with pre -development expenses associated with very low, low, and moderate income housing development Some disbursements from the Housing Trust Fund will be grants, but the majority of funds will be revolving loans, with borrowers paying back principal and applicable interest into the trust, therefore ensuring a permanent source of financing. Impact fees and utility capacity charges are needed to provide revenue for constructing capacity -producing capital improvements necessary to accommodategrowth. Overall, impact fee revenue partially funds the construction of major roadways, libraries, schools, parks, correctional facilities, fire/ems facilities, law enforcement facilities, solid waste facilities, and public buildings, and capacity charges fund the expansion of the county's regional water and sewer system. These fees are based' on fair share payments by the people benefiting from the capital improvements, impact fees and utility capacity charges. With respect to affordable housing, those fees increase the cost ofhousing and put a burden on the production of affordable housing projects. To lessen the impact on affordable housing projects, the county in March of 2020 (upon recommendation by the AHAC and approval by the BCC) implemented new impact fee waivers/exemptions impact fees for single-family homes of less than 1,500 square feet occupied by households earning less than 80% of Area Median Income. The County's SHIP program can also be utilized to provide impact fee loans and grants to extremely low, very low, and moderate -income households and grants and loans to connect to the county water or sewer system (this includes loans associated with new home construction to Habitat for Humanity clients). Besides using SHIP funds, in the past, the county has provided impact fee grants and loans to eligible households as part of Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) neighborhood revitalization and housing projects. Although CDBG funds can be used for impact fee loans and grants, they are not always available for the county to utilize. This is due to a number of factors, including the fact that: • the County must apply to the state for CDBG program funds for a specific project; • the application process is highly competitive, and awards are not guaranteed; • the County can only have one active/open CDBG contract with the state at any given time; • at times, the County submits CDBG applications and obtains awards for non- housing -related projects; • CDBG awards can last from 2 to 4 years at a time, and 8 19 • the County cannot apply for more CDBG funds until the previously awarded CDBG project is complete and the awarded CDBG contract with the state is closed out. Overall, the county has provided many SHIP impact fee grants/loans to eligible households. Since this program has been successful, the county should keep its SHIP Program impact fee assistance strategy for income-qualified households. The County's new impact fee waiver categories for single -family and multifamily homes of less than 1,500 square feet for income-eligible households should also be maintained and evaluated in future years to determine their overall utilization and whether or not adjustments should be made to the eligible categories. RECOMMENDATION: The county should maintain Housing Element Policy 4.3 and Policy 4.4 regarding financing of impact fees, payment of impact, fees, and payment of water and wastewater capacity charges for income-eligible households through SHIP funds. The County should also maintain its newly adopted impact fee waiver and reductions under Title X of the Indian River County Code for certain single -family and multifamily housing units occupied by households with incomes of less than 80% of AMI, and the County should continue to apply for other funding sources (such as CDBGs) to subsidize impact fees and utility capacity charges. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ACTION: Board of County is Approvat,pfN .:,AHAC-Recommendation Yes [ ] ❑ 9 �Q C.The allowance of flexibility in densities for affordable housing. Within Indian River County, the future land use map and zoning district designations establish a maximum density or intensity for all properties. Overall, density is an important factor in forming the character of a community and the preferred lifestyle of its residents. While higher densities may result in lower housing costs, higher across-the-board densities, do not always translate into lower housing prices. Consequently, the preferred method for reducing housing costs through increased density is to provide affordable housing density bonuses associated with affordable housing projects. Currently, Housing Policy 2.5 and LDR Section 911.14(4) provide affordable housing projects with up to a 20% density bonus over the maximum density established by the underlying land use designation. Currently, Housing Element Policy 2.5 and Section 911.14(4) of the LDRs provide for affordable housing density bonuses. Section 971.41(9) of the LDRs provides for small lot subdivisions for affordable housing. POLICY 2.5: The County shall maintain its affordable housing density bonus provision for planned development projects, allowing eligible affordable housing projects with a market value of affordable housing units not to exceed 21/2 times the county's median income, to receive up to a 20% density bonus based on the following table. Very Low Income (VLI) and Low income Density NAdditional (LI) Bonus Range of Possible Affordable (Percent oviding Additional Buffer Density B?_one Density Bonus Units increase and Landscaping basef the following options Percentage as in (percent increiftLin allowable units) (Percent increase in Percentage allowable allowable units) Of units). Project's Total Units Oplon I Option II Material equal to a 20' Material equal to a 25' wide Type C buffer* with 6' wide Type B buffer* with 6' opaque feature along opaque feature along residential district residential district boundaries and 4' opaque boundaries and 4' opaque feature along roadways feature along roadways More than 30% 10% 5% or 10% 10-20% *Buffer types are identified in Chapter 926 of the county's Land Development Regulations The county's current median income is $93,200 (per FHFA 04/01/2025). The County's Affordable Housing Density Bonus Provisions are Codified in Section 911.14L4) of the LDRs (located at Municode. comb 10 21 As part of the AHAC's January 22, 2020, recommendations, the AHAC recommended increasing the density bonus from 20% to 50%. The BCC agreed in concept, but requested that the County Attorney's office review to consider any legal considerations and present its findings to the BCC for a final determination. If reviewed and approved by the BCC, staff will ultimately need to prepare draft revisions to Section 971.41(9) for BCC consideration. Another option to increase affordable housing project yields is the county's small lot subdivision allowance. Although the county's small lot subdivision regulations, section 971.41(9) of the county's land development regulations, do not have an allowance for density bonuses, the smaller lot configuration allows for more lots to be created. While a standard RS -6 parcel (single-family residential up to 6 units per acre) has a minimum lot size of 7,000 square feet, the small lot subdivision regulation allows for lot sizes to be reduced to 5,000 square feet. While standard RS -6 zoning typically yields about 2.5 to 3 units per acre, a small lot subdivision can yield up to 5 units per acre. The county's Small Lot Subdivision for Affordable Housing Proiects are Codified in Section 971.41(9jof the LDRs (located at Municode. comb As part of the AHAC's January 22, 2020 recommendations, the AHAC recommended and the BCC approved in concept allowing very small lot subdivisions (smaller lots than currently provided for in the small lot subdivision regulations. In the future, regulations for very small lot subdivisions will be prepared and considered for adoption. ANALYSIS: The allowance of an up to 20% density bonus (or more based on recent recommendation by the AHAC) for affordable housing projects and the county's small lot subdivision provision and potential very small lot subdivision regulations approved in concept by the BCC provide and can provide for the development of affordable housing projects with higher densities and/or higher yields. Those provisions are appropriate tools for providing density increases for affordable housing projects. General density increases, however, are not acceptable in Indian River County and may not result in less expensive homes. RECOMMENDATION: The county should maintain its affordable housing density bonus and small lot subdivision provisions for affordable housing projects and move forward with providing specific ordinance revision recommendations to the BCC for very small lot subdivisions and for increased density bonuses for affordable housing development projects. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ACTION: Board of County Commissioners Approval of the AHAC Recommendation Yes [] No ❑ 11 22 D.The reservation of infrastructure capacity for housing for very low income persons, low income persons, and moderate income persons. Consistent with state law, the Indian River County Comprehensive Plan provides that no development, including housing development, shall be approved unless there is sufficient infrastructure capacity or capacity funding available to serve the development. These requirements are contained in Chapter 910, Concurrency Management System, of the county's LDRs. This concurrency management requirement serves as the principal mechanism for ensuring that growth is managed in a manner consistent with the provisions of the comprehensive plan. In Indian River County, there are two types of, concurrency certificates. One is a conditional concurrency certificate. A conditional concurrency certificate indicates that, at the time of conceptual development approval, there is sufficient'' capacity to accommodate the development. Conditional concurrency, however, does not require payment of impact fees and water and sewer capacity charges and does not vest or guarantee that capacity will be available at the time of building permit issuance. The second type of concurrency is initial concurrency. Initial Concurrency requires payment of impact fees and water and sewer capacity charges and vests (reserves capacity for) the development. In Indian River County, initial concurrency certificates vest capacity for the duration of the concurrency certificate, either one (1) year, three (3) years, or seven (7) years. According to county regulations, initial concurrency certificates may be issued only to projects with approved site plans or complete Land Development Permit applications. To obtain an initial concurrency certificate, an applicant must pay all applicable impact fees, as well as water and sewer capacity charges, in advance of development. This then vests the project and guarantees that adequate infrastructure will be available for the project at the time of building permit issuance. The vesting will last for the duration of the concurrency certificate and will expire at the end of the concurrency certificate timeframe. After issuance of an initial concurrency certificate, an applicant must obtain all building permits associated with the initial concurrency certificate and pursue development to completion by obtaining a Certificate of Occupancy (CO). ANALYSIS: Reserving infrastructure capacity upfront for a project is important if there are deficiencies in concurrency -related facilities. In Indian River County, there currently is sufficient capacity in all concurrency -related facilities to accommodate development projects. Therefore, reserving capacity upfront is not a critical issue at this time. 12 23 As development activity increases in the future, however, capacity may become an issue. When that occurs, reserving capacity for a project may become an actuality. Reserving capacity for one project means that the capacity reserved for the project is not available for other projects. For that reason, the county requires that an applicant pay all impact fees and utility capacity charges in order to reserve capacity, thereby ensuring that the county has the funds to construct the increment of capacity consumed by the applicant's project. To date, no affordable housing project or unit has been denied due to concurrency requirements. RECOMMENDATION: The county should maintain its current concurrency management procedures, which allow for upfront reservation of infrastructure capacity. Like other applicants, affordable housing applicants may apply for an Initial Concurrency Certificate and reserve infrastructure capacity upfront. Each time the county evaluates its affordable housing incentives, the county will also determine whether or not its concurrency requirements are an impediment to approving affordable housing projects or issuing permits for affordable housing units. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONE ACTION - Board of County Commissioners Approval of the. mmendatton j Yes [] No E. Affordable accessory residential units. Through its land development regulations, Indian River County permits the construction of small dwelling units (second unit) as accessory to single family houses on a residentially zoned property. This regulation is intended to make inexpensive dwelling units associated with a primary residence available to low income households. Following is the applicable LDR section for accessory dwelling units. Section 971.41(10) of the LDRs Accessory Dwelling Unit: a) The construction of an accessory dwelling unit on a residentially zoned lot shall be allowed subject to the provisions of this section). The standards and requirements of this section are intended to make available inexpensive dwelling units to meet the needs of older households, single -member households, and single parent households. This is in recognition of the fact that housing costs continue to increase, that households continue to decline in size, and that the number of elderly Americans is on the rise. (b) Districts requiring administrative permit approval, A-3 A-2 A-1 RFD RS -1 RS -2 RS -3 RS -6 RT -6 RM -3 RM -4 RM -6 RM -8 RM -10 Con -2 Con -3 Rose -4 RMH-6 RMH-8 I Requirements of section 971.41(10) shall not supersede property owner deed restrictions. (d) Additional information required. 1. A site plan conforming to Chapter 914 requirements. e) Criteria for accessory dwelling units: 1. Accessory dwelling units shall be located only on lots which satisfy the minimum lot size requirement of the applicable zoning district, with the exception of legal nonconforming lots that are at least 75 feet wide and have a minimum lot area of 9,750 square feet. 2. Any accessory dwelling unit shall be clearly incidental to the principal dwelling and shall only be developed in conjunction with or after development of the principal dwelling unit 3. On lots that are less than 200,000 square feet in size, not more than one (1) accessory dwelling unit shall be established in conjunction with a principal dwelling unit 4. No accessory dwelling unit shall be established in conjunction with a multifamily dwelling unit 5. For lots that are one(]) acre in size or less, the heated/cooled gross floor area of the accessory dwelling unit shall not exceed fifty (50) percent of the heated/cooled gross floor area of the principal structure or one thousand,000) gross square feet, whichever is less. For lots greater than one (1) acre in size or less, the heated/closed gross floor area of the accessory dwelling unit shall not exceed fifty (50) percent of the heated/cooled gross floor area of the principal structure or one thousand two hundred (1,200) gross square feet, whichever is less. Existing accessory dwelling units may be enlarged consistent with the above allowances. Any accessory dwelling unit shall be no smaller than three hundred (300) gross square feet of heated/cooled area. 6. Lots two hundred thousand (200,000) square feet in size or greater maybe allowed a second accessory dwelling unit not exceeding six hundred (600) square feet in size. 7. For lots that are less than two hundred thousand (200,000) square feet in size, detached accessory dwelling units shall be located no farther than seventy-five (75) feet in distance from the principal dwelling unit from the closest point of the principal dwelling unit to the closest point of the accessory dwelling unit For lots two hundred thousand (200,000) square feet in size or greater, the maximum distance separation shall be one hundred fifty (150) feet measured in the same manner. 14 25 8. Excluding converted garage accessory dwelling units, the accessory dwelling unit shall be designed so that the exterior facade material is similar in appearance to the facade of the existing principal structure. 9. One(]) off-street parking space shall be provided for each accessory dwelling unit in addition to the minimum spaces required for the principal dwelling unit 10. The accessory dwelling unit shall be serviced by centralized water and wastewater, or meet the environmental health department's well and septic tank and drain field requirements. Modification, expansion or installation of well and/or septic tank facilities to serve the accessory dwelling unit shall be designed in a manner that does not render any adjacent vacant properties "unbuildable "for development when well and/or septic tank facilities would be required to service development on those adjacent properties. 11. No accessory dwelling unit shall be sold separately from the principal dwelling unit All accessory dwelling unit and the principal dwelling unit shall be located on a single lot or parcel or on a combination of lots or parcels unified under a recorded unity of title document 12. An accessory dwelling unit shall be charged an impact fee based on the lowest appropriate residential unit impact fee category 13. Mobile or manufactured homes and recreational vehicles shall no! be used as accessory dwelling units. The accessory dwelling unit shall mee the minimum requiremen&for a dwelling unit in accordance with the Florida Building Code. 14. All applicable zoning district regulations pertaining to setbacks and lot coverage provisions shall be met 15. An accessory dwelling unit shall not be operated as a vacation rental, as defined in Section 901.03. No accessory dwelling unit may be utilized for commercial purposes or may be permitted to obtain home occupation permit On February 18, 2020, the BCC approved a recommendation by the AHAC to increase the square footage cap for accessory dwelling units from 33% to 50% of heated/cooled gross floor area of the principal home and to keep the 750 square foot under air cap, except for lots greater than one acre in size containing a principal residence greater than 2,500 square feet under air. In those cases, the accessory dwelling unit cap would be 1,000 square feet. On June 19, 2022, the BCC approved an LDR amendment that increases the maximum size for ADUs to 50% of the heated/cooled area of the primary residence or 1,000 square feet (this is increased to 1,200 sf for lots exceeding one acre in size), whichever is less. On parcels that are 200,000 square feet or larger, a second accessory dwelling unit is allowed as long as the size does not exceed 600 sf. ANALYSIS: On September 29, 1992, the Board of County Commissioners adopted the county's accessory dwelling unit provision. In Indian River County, accessory dwelling units are allowed in all residential zoning districts. In addition to allowing for these smaller units, Section 971.41(10) of the county's land development regulations establishes specific land use criteria to regulate the size, location, and appearance of these units and prevent overcrowding. Even though the county has allowed accessory dwelling units since 1992, these types of units were not popular until 2004, when the price of land and housing started to increase. When housing affordability became an issue, more people started looking at ways to create affordable housing units. One method was to build more accessory dwelling units. These types of units are appropriate as affordable housing units. Recently recommended revisions will allow more opportunities for homeowners to create more appropriately sized affordable housing units throughout the Unincorporated County. is 26 F. The reduction of parking and setback requirements for affordable housing. As structured, the county's Land Development Regulations establish minimum setback and lot size requirements for both single-family residential zoning districts and multiple -family residential zoning districts. These setback requirements provide a standard separation between houses and between houses and roadways. For affordable housing projects, the small lot subdivision provisions of section 971.41 of the LDRs allow for a reduction of lot size and building setbacks for single-family homes. In the RS -6 zoning district, for example, single-family homes are required to have a minimum lot width of seventy (70) feet. With small lot subdivisions, however, lots having a minimum width of only fifty (50) feet and reduced side yard setbacks of seven (7) feet (instead of ten (10) feet) can be created. While rear yard setbacks are reduced from 20 feet to 15 feet, the minimum front yard setback on all single-family homes from the edge of right-of-way is twenty (20) feet. This setback distance allows for cars to be parked in the driveway and not block the sidewalk or impede pedestrian movement. More recently, the AHAC proposed and on February 18, 2020 the BCC approved the concept of allowing for very small lot subdivisions that would have lots as narrow as 36 feet. While the concept needs to be presented in code form to the BCC, it is anticipated that side, front, and rear yard setbacks will be similar to those of the County's small lot subdivision provisions. For residential uses, throughout the County's various residential zoning districts, the county requires two parking spaces for each dwelling unit. This requirement is detailed in section 954.05(56) N*as follows:- Section 954.05(50 Single-family dwellings and dtij dwellings, and duplexes shall 954.07(4) and 954.10. Uncove setback requirements. -10 ANALYSIS: Two (paces for each dwelling unit, single-family mpted from all other requirements in subsections �ng spaces shall be exempted from the front yard To ensure health andWty, all residential development must meet current minimum parking and setback requirements for the appropriate zoning district as established in the county LDRs. For example, the county's 20 -foot minimum front yard setback provides enough distance, but not an excessive distance, for parking a vehicle in a driveway without the vehicle projecting into the sidewalk. Reducing or eliminating parking requirements would force residents to park in roadway rights-of-way. This could create safety issues unless minimum mandatory right-of-way widths are increased (which would reduce lot depth and area). Generally, reduced setbacks for affordable housing projects are appropriate, because reduced setbacks can increase yield and reduce housing prices. In Indian River County, 17 28 the small lot subdivision allowances provide for reduced lot sizes, as well as reduced side yards and reduced rear yard setbacks, for affordable housing projects only. The very small lot subdivision concept proposed by AHAC and conceptually approved by the BCC on February 18, 2020, would serve to maintain an appropriate front yard setback but would reduce lot widths to as little as 36 feet. This would provide for the development of more homes and help to reduce overall development costs while maintaining minimal but acceptable setback distances. RECOMMENDATION: The county's current parking requirements are appropriate and should be maintained. Through its small lot subdivision allowance, the county provides for appropriate reduced setbacks for affordable housing projects. This small lot subdivision allowance should be maintained. The additional very small lot subdivision allowance should be evaluated further and considered for adoption, provided appropriate spacing and setbacks can be achieved while providing for appropriate home size and configurations. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ACTION: Board of County Commissioners Approval of the AHAC Recommendation Yes [] No it 18 29 G. The allowance of flexible lot configuration, including zero lot line configurations for affordable housing. Currently, the Board of County Commissioners may grant waivers from the residential development standards found in Chapter 911 of the LDRs through the Planned Development (PD) process established in Chapter 915 of the county LDRs. If granted, these waivers can allow for development of small lot configuration, zero lot line and reduced setback projects. The waiver criteria for the PD process are found in section 915.15 of the LDRs and are provided below. Section 915.15. Planned development allowable waivers and development parameters. (1) Conceptual P.D. plans shall list, for all areas and phases<within the P.D. project area, the proposed waivers and development parameters for the following: a. Minimum lot size (in square feet); b. Minimum lot width (in feet); c. Minimum lot frontage (in feet); d Minimum yard setbacks for buildings: front, rear, and side, e. Minimum yard setbacks for accessory structures (such as pools, patios, and decks); front, rear, and side; f. Maximum lot coverage; building(s) and impervious surface area; g. Minimum separation distances between buildings; h. Minimum right-of-way widths (byroad type), L Minimum open space per lot and by phase [Note: The minimum open space for the entire project shall meet or exceed the requirements of section 915.18.1 j. Minimum preservation/conservation area per lot Note: more conceptual plan submittal requirements are listed -out in section 915.22 (2) Notwithstanding other provisions in this chapter (915) and Chapter 971, specific land use criteria listed in Chapter 971 may be waived (modified or not applied) where such criteria would merely apply to the compatibility of uses within the P.D. project area if approved by the county. Where specific land use criteria apply to the relationship of a uses) within a P.D. project and properties adjacent to the project area, the specific land use criteria shall apply pursuant to the provisions of chapter 971. (3) The conventional standards and criteria found in Chapter 911, Zoning, not covered in section 915.15(1) shall apply unless otherwise specifically waived or modified by other provisions of this chapter. ANALYSIS: Generally, the PD procesIses as a mechanism whereby the county can approve projects with reduced setbacks and/or mixed uses. The advantage of using the PD process instead of traditional zoning is that an applicant can increase or at least maximize his development project's density. In the PD process, however, there are development -required trade-offs, such as additional landscaping, which are required to gain the waivers for smaller lots and higher yields. These trade-offs can have the effect of off -setting any housing unit price reductions due to increasing yield. The county's small lot subdivision allowance, however, provides for specific reduced lot sizes, and setbacks without requiring any specific waivers. This is anticipated to be, to a greater extent, true with potential very small lot subdivision regulations recommended by the AHAC and conceptually approved by the BCC on February 18, 2020. County Planning Staff are in the process of studying the inclusion of affordable housing as a public benefit in the PD process. Once a quantifiable understanding of the full benefit of 19 30 affordable housing is established in comparison to other proposed benefits. Then staff will be able to move forward with making affordable housing a regular component of residential planned developments. RECOMMENDATION: The county should maintain its existing PD process, which allows for waivers from conventional zoning standards (setbacks, lot size, etc.) as an option for residential development projects. The County should continue to investigate the inclusion of affordable housing in the PD process and then move towards making it a regular component of a residential planned development. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ACTION: Board of County Commissioners Approval of the AHACRecommendation Yes [] No ❑ el i i - I i 20 31 H. The modification of street requirements for affordable housing. As adopted, the county's existing sidewalk and street requirements provide for minimum construction standards to ensure public safety. According to section 913.09(b)(1) (Subdivisions and Plats) of the LDRs, all subdivisions must comply with the minimum standards set forth in Chapter 952 (Traffic). While Chapter 952 sets the minimum right- of-way width for a local or residential street at 60 feet, the minimum right-of-way width may be reduced to 50 feet if the street is constructed with a curb and gutter drainage system. In both cases, however, minimum lane widths remain the same at 11 feet. Although there is a higher cost associated with curb and gutter construction than with swale drainage, the reduction in the amount of right-of-way can produce a higher yield for a project. These street right-of-way requirements can be modified through the Planned Development (PD) process. Following is the county's current minimum right-of-way requirement. 913.09(b)(1) Minimum street and rights-of-way widths. The minimum street and rights-of-way widths shall be as stated in Chapter 952, Traffic, of the LDRs. The board of county commissioners may require the increase of right-of-way andpavement widths if it finds that the modification its width is consistent with theprojected traffic needs and good engineering practice No variance will begranted on minimum right-of-way widths for public streets. Right-of-way widths for o . -way streq nay be reduced from the above standards as approved by the public works director. IdEW"WI ANALYSIS: As structured, the county's minimum street right-of-way width requirements are based on the minimum area needed to accommodate the various improvements that must be located in the right-of-way. Besides travel lanes, sidewalks, and drainage facilities, these improvements include water and sewer lines, gas lines, phone lines, cable lines, and others. Since the referenced improvements must be provided for in the road right-of-way, the county has determined that the minimum right-of-way width generally must be 60 feet for swale drainage roads and 50 feet for curb and gutter roadways. Reductions in those widths, however, may be accommodated via special designs approved through the County's PD (Planned Development) process. Because the county's minimum local road right-of-way width requirement may be modified through a PD process, when warranted, the county accommodates the subject incentive. RECOMMENDATION: The county's current street right-of-way general requirements are appropriate to ensure public safety, and the County's current allowance for modifications through the PD approval process should be maintained. 21 32 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ACTION: Board of County Commissioners Approval of the AHAC Recommendation Yes [] No ❑ I. The establishment of a process by which local government considers, before adoption, policies, procedures, ordinances, regulations, or plan provisions that increase the cost of housing. Currently, Policy 1.7 of the Housing Element of the Comprehensive Plan requires that a financial impact statement be provided to appropriate advisory committees as well as to the Board of County Commissioners prior to the adoption of any new county regulation that may increase the cost of housing. Below is Policy 1.7 of the Housing Element of the Comprehensive Plan which details the adoption process for county regulations that may increase the cost of new housing. POLICY 1.7: As part of the adoption process for any county regulation which could affect housing development, county planning staff shall prepare a Financial Impact Statement to assess the anticipated impact of the proposed regulation on the cost of housing. When proposed regulatory activities are anticipated to increase the estimated cost per unit for the development of housing, the Financial Impact Statement shall include an estimated increased cost per unit projection. The financial impact statement then will be reviewed by the Planning and Zoning Commission, and, if possible, the Affordable Housing Advisory Committee. Those groups shall consider the regulation's effect on housing cost in making their recommendation to the Board of County Commissioners The Board of County Commissioners will consider the financial impact statemV49z. its final ion on the adoption of any proposed regulations. OLI[:\_ili7M Since 1994, staff has prepared Financial Impact Statements for all proposed new regulations impacting housing costs. By providing Financial Impact Statements of proposed regulations to decision -makers before the adoption of those regulations, planning staff ensures that decision -makers consider the costs as well as the benefits of proposed new policies, ordinances, and regulations. While these Financial Impact Statements do not prevent the Board of County Commissioners from adopting new regulations, the statements do provide the Board with an additional tool to measure the effect of proposed regulations. RECOMMENDATION: The county's current process of providing Financial Impact Statements to the Board of County Commissioners prior to the adoption of any new regulations, ordinances, policies, procedures, or plan provisions that may increase the cost of affordable housing should be maintained. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ACTION: Board of County Commissioners Approval of the AHAC Recommendation Yes [V] No ❑ 23 34 J. The preparation of a printed inventory of locally owned public lands suitable for affordable housing. In 2006, the Florida State Legislature passed HB 1363 relating to affordable housing. One provision of that bill was that each local government must prepare an inventory of all real property that it owns within its jurisdiction that is appropriate for use as affordable housing. Beginning in July 2007, then every 3 years thereafter, Indian River County needs to prepare an inventory list of all real property within its jurisdiction to which the county holds fee simple title and is appropriate for use as affordable housing. At a public hearing on June 19, 2007, the Board of County Commissioners reviewed an inventory list of 2007 county -owned properties. The Board then adopted a resolution that included an inventory list of county -owned properties that are appropriate for affordable housing. With respect to those properties, the Board of County Commissioners decided to donate the parcels to non-profit housing organizations for the construction of permanent affordable housing. Consistent with the legislature's three-year review requirement, the Board of County Commissioners, in 2010, 2013, 2016, 2019, and 2022 reviewed an associatedinventory list of county owned properties appropriate for the provision of affordable housing. At those times, the Board decided to sell surplus properties and deposit the sale proceeds into the county's affordable housing trust fund, as well as donate surplus properties to non-profit affordable housing developers. Comprehensive Plan Housing Element Policy 2.4 provides for maintaining an inventory of all surplus county -owned land and making those lots available to housing developers. POLICY 2.4: The county's general services department shall, pursuant to section 125.379 F.S., maintain an inventory of all surplus county -owned land and foreclosed properties that are appropriate for affordable housing and dispose of these properties consistent with section 125.379 F.S. requirements. ANALYSIS: A-6., Consistent with state law,he Board of County Commissioners, in 2007, reviewed and approved an inventory list of county -owned properties. Of all the properties on that list, ten were determined to be appropriate for affordable housing. The county then donated eight of these properties to non-profit affordable housing organizations for the construction of permanent affordable housing units. The non-profit housing organizations that received the donated lots were Habitat for Humanity, Every Dream Has a Price, and the Coalition for Attainable Homes. Donating county -owned surplus lands to non-profit housing organizations will reduce the cost of affordable housing units on the donated properties and is an appropriate, affordable housing tool. In 2010, 2013, 2016, 2019, and 2022, the county reviewed and approved its associated inventory lists of county -owned properties. The board determined certain properties to be surplus and directed staff to donate certain properties to non-profit housing organizations and sell the remaining properties and deposit the proceeds in the county's affordable housing trust fund. 24 35 RECOMMENDATION: Policy 2.4 of the Housing Element should be maintained, and the county should continue to keep a list of county owned surplus properties appropriate for affordable housing and disposing of those properties. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ACTION: Board of County Commissioners Approval of the AHAC Recommendation Yes [�] No ❑ II i 25 56 36 K. The support of development near transportation hubs and major employment centers and mixed-use developments. In Indian River County, the Future Land Use Map (FLUM) identifies areas appropriate for residential development and the appropriate density for those areas. The objective of the FLUM is to create a land use pattern that situates residential development in close proximity to schools, health care facilities, employment centers, and major roadways. Policy 1.9 of the housing element provides support of development near transportation hubs, major development centers, and mixed-use developments. The policy reads as follows: Policy 1.9: The county shall support housing development near transportation hubs, major employment center, and mixed-use development by expediting the permit process for these types of housing projects. ANALYSIS: In Indian River County, the future land use map is an important tool in establishing appropriate locations for residential development. Generally, the map provides for residential development to be located near compatible land uses and existing neighborhoods and proximate to public transportation, major employment centers, and community services. Ideally, affordable housing projects should be located near employment centers and transportation hubs for additional savings in terms of transportation costs and travel time. For that reason, the county supports locating affordable housing developments near transportation hubs, major employment centers, and mixed mer xQ ments by expedit' the permit process for these types of housing NOW l�L 1. 1�1L` 1\Ltf 11V1�. The coun ould main ta housing element policy 1.9 for support of residential development a located near transportation hubs, employment centers, and mixed-use developments b xpediting permit reviews for these types of developments. At its next Evaluation and Appraisal Report (EAR) review, the county will examine its land use policies and land use designations to determine if such policies and designations are appropriate for encouraging development near transportation hubs and major employment centers and consistent with a recent AHAC recommendation will evaluate the need for additional multi -family allowances (either through increased multi -family zoning or increased allowances for multi -family housing in other zoning districts). Solutions will be reviewed with the County Attorney to consider any potential legal issues and proposed to the BCC. 26 37 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ACTION: Board of County Commissioners Approval of the AHAC Recommendation Yes [] No ❑ Other Housing Strategies Besides the affordable housing incentives listed in paragraphs A through K of Section 420.9076 F.S., the county has established several other policies to assist non-profit housing organizations in providing affordable housing throughout the county. Community Land Trust (CLT) Policy 4.10 of the Housing Element reads as follows: Policy 4.10: the county shall assist non profit :housing organizations in establishing Community Land Trusts (CLT) by providing technical support to those organizations. One tool to provide homeownership opportunities to households that would otherwise be renters is a Community Land Trust, A Community Land Trust (CLT) is a nonprofit organization that seeks to preserve housing affordability over the long term. By selling homes to low or moderate -income families, but retaining ownership of the land under those homes, a CLT preserves housing affordability even after an affordable housing unit is sold. Generally, a CLT leases a land parcel to a homeowner for 99 years while the homeowner owns the structure on the land. In the land trust model, buyers of land trust homes agree that, when they move, they will sell their home to another low or moderate -income family at an affordable price. Consequently, the resale of CLT units is limited to income eligible resale of CLT units is limited to income - eligible households, and resale prices are limited to keep CLT units affordable for the next homebuyer. By owning the land under the house, the land trust ensures that the subsidy is retained for the benefit of subsequent families. Therefore, the owner of a CLT unit may share in the equity produced by the sale of a CLT unit, but will not realize a market rate of return. According to the Central Florida Workforce Housing Toolkit, some of the most established CLT's are Durham, North Carolina; Burlington, Vermont; The New Town, Tempe, Arizona; Sawmill, Albuquerque, New Mexico; Middle Key, Florida; and Hannibal Square, Winter Park, Florida. Generally, CLTs are used: ■ In fast-growing areas, where the price of real estate is escalating rapidly. They can be used in gentrifying areas to preserve a community's character. Limits on resale prices ensure that some housing remains affordable, even in these areas. ■ In disinvested neighborhoods, where CLTs can be used to increase owner occupancy, 27 38 decrease absentee ownership, improve the physical condition of housing, and stabilize the community. Such CLTs assist not only the buyers of the CLT homes, but also existing homeowners in the area, who likely are lower income families. In expensive resort communities, where CLTs can provide housing for the community's workers. Benefits: - Provides permanent stock of affordable & workforce housing - Lowers housing cost - Provides some return on equity - Provides for deduction of mortgage interest payments - Provides financial stability (no fear of rent increase) - No cost to the county Issues: - Better for a household than renting, but not as good as traditional home ownership - Resale restriction limits the ability of the owner to utilize full equity - Resale formula must be prepared carefully to provide some benefit to the homeowner without making the house unaffordable for the next homebuyer - Mechanics of resales (direct sale or through CLT) are complicated and must be established upfront - Payment of ad valorem taxes and insurance are additional costs that an owner of a CLT home must incur that a renter does not Conclusion: A CLT is an effective method of providing affordable homeownership opportunities. Although CLTs are generally established by private non-profit groups, local governments usually assist non-profit housing groups which are willing to form CLTs. This assistance may involve providing technical assistance, providing surplus properties appropriate for affordable housing and others. RECOMMENDAT The county should maintain Housing Element policy 4.10 to assist non-profit housing organizations seeking to establish a CLT. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ACTION: Board of County Commissioners Approval of the AHAC Recommendation Yes [] No ❑ 28 39 Private/Public Housing Trust Fund Policy 4.13 of the Housing Element reads as follows: Policy 4.13: The county shall create a new private/public housing trust fund Generally, Housing Trust Funds are established through an ordinance or legislation passed by a county, city, or state legislature. Two steps are necessary to create a Housing Trust Fund. First, a revenue source must be dedicated to the Housing Trust Fund, or other obligations (e.g., developer extractions) that create revenue must be established. Second, the Housing Trust Fund must be created as a separate and distinct entity that can receive and disburse funds. Currently, the county has a housing trust fund for SHIP program funds and an HHR trust fund for HHR program funds. A private/public housing trust fund may be established by a city or county to collect public and private funds that may be used to assist income eligible households with the provision of affordable housing. A private/public trust fund would be separate from a SHIP trust fund. Benefits: - Can provide gap financing (low-interest loan or grant) - No cost to the county unless the county decides to contribute to the trust fund - Local governments that cannot provide affordable housing within their jurisdictions could contribute to a trust fund - Coulded as a match to get other federal or state funds - Additi funding for the provision of Affordable or Workforce Housing (gap fimanc leveragiN other funds). Establishing a private/public housing trust fund could facilitate the provision of more affordable housing. Within Indian River County, high cost barrier island towns that cannot provide affordable housing within their jurisdiction could contribute to a private/public affordable housing trust fund. Also, private parties, businesses, and developers could contribute money to this trust fund. RECOMMENDATION: The county should maintain Housing Element policy 4.13 for its current SHIP trust fund and in support of other trust funds that may be established in the future. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ACTION: Board of County Commissioners Approval of the AHAC Recommendation Yes [] No ❑ 29 40 Community Development Corporation (CDC) Policy 4.11 of the Housing Element reads as follows: Policy 4.11: The county shall assist non-profit organizations in establishing Community Development Corporations (CDC) by providing technical support to those organizations. Community Development Corporation (CDC) is a broad term referring to not-for-profit organizations incorporated to provide programs, offer services, and engage in other activities that promote and support a community. CDCs usually serve a geographic location, such as a neighborhood or a town. They often focus on serving lower-income residents or struggling neighborhoods. They can be involved in a variety of activities, including economic development, education, and real estate development. These organizations are often associated with the development of affordable housing. Activities: Real estate development - affordable housing Economic development -small business lending -small business technical assistance -small business incubation (i.e., provision of space at low or no cost to start-up businesses) Education -early childhood -workforce trainin " Nonrofit incubation or workforce housing Advocates for affordable housing No cost to the county No major issues Conclusion: An active CDC can assist with the provision of affordable housing. RECOMMENDATION: The county should maintain policy 4.11 of the Housing Element for providing assistance to any not-for-profit organization proposing to form a CDC. 30 41 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ACTION: Board of County Commissioners Approval of the AHAC Recommendation Yes [] No ❑ _3142 Employer Assisted Housing Policy 4.12 of the Housing Element reads as follows: Policy 4.12: The county shall assist employers with establishing employer assisted housing projects by providing technical support to those employers. Employer Assisted Housing (EAH) is an initiative where employers can assist their employees in purchasing a home; in exchange, the employer is guaranteed that the participating employee will remain with the firm for a designated period of time. The employee benefits as he/she receives substantial assistance in obtaining a home. The employer benefits as the program is an effective recruitment tool and aids in the retention of employees. Employers who wish to assist employees with housing can undertake any number of activities, including providing (or partnering with another agency to provide) homeownership education and counseling services; providing down payment assistance, closing cost assistance, and/or second mortgage financing as grants, low or no -interest loans or forgivable loans; offering an employee a savings plan with the employer making a matching contribution; providing a mortgage guarantee to assist employees with securing financing; or acquiring property to rent to employees, either at market or subsidized rates. Employer assisted housing programs generally are used in areas where housing prices are high and/or unemployment is low, and in areas where one employer is dominant. Benefits: 6u_som g flarge private and public employers Employer assisted housing is an effective program for employers to provide affordable housing for workers and to retain those workers for longer periods. RECOMMENDATION: The county should maintain Housing Element policy 4.12 to assist employers with establishing an employer -assisted housing program. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ACTION: Board of County Commissioners Approval of the AHAC Recommendation Yes [] No ❑ 32 43 New Construction Technologies Policy 1.8 of the Housing Element reads as follows: Policy 1.8: The county shall expedite permits for housing projects utilizing new construction technologies, including green building programs and Energy STAR® Program. New construction technologies (such as modular homes, factory made tiny homes, etc.) and new green building programs may be utilized for the provision of affordable housing. In some cases, new construction technologies can expedite the construction of new affordable homes and be more cost effective. As part of the January 22, 2020, AHAC recommendations approved by the BCC is a recommendation to develop tiny and modular home information packets. Those packets, once developed, will be made available to homeowners and builders to inform them of the possibilities, key code allowances and requirements, and review processes related to them. The informational packets should serve to promote more affordable ` housing by simply presenting the option and helping to facilitate their expedited development through prompt/informative information. Benefits: Decreases housing cost Expedites ming prod Issues: This is an effective of reducing housing costs. Currently, the county allows new construction technologies, including green building programs, and expedites permits for affordable housing projects. Providing detailed information will help to encourage and ultimately facilitate the development of new affordable housing types. RECOMMENDATION: The county should maintain Housing Element policy 1.8 for expediting permits for affordable housing projects utilizing new construction technologies and green building programs. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ACTION: Board of County Commissioners Approval of the AHAC Recommendation Yes [] No ❑ 33 44 CONCLUSION Since the adoption of the County's Comprehensive Plan Housing Element in 1990, the adoption of the County's Affordable Housing Incentive Plan in 1994, and then the adoption of the County's EAR -based amendments in 2010, the county has established and maintained a number of affordable housing incentives. As such, Indian River County currently provides ten of the eleven affordable housing incentives listed in items A through K of Section 420.9076(4) F.S. For reasons explained in the analysis, the item H incentive relating to modification of street requirements has not been adopted and is not recommended for adoption. In the past, the county's ten adopted affordable housing incentives have worked well in encouraging non-profit housing organizations and for-profit affordable housing developers to provide affordable housing. Recent analysis by the AHAC has identified an opportunity for revision to several of the existing incentive strategies. Those proposed revisions include ordinance revisions to allow very small lot subdivisions (in addition to the current allowance for small lot subdivisions), increased accessory dwelling unit size, impact fee exemptions for affordable housing, and greater affordable housing development density. County Staff have been able to implement increased accessory dwelling unit size over the last year and are currently in the process of implementing additional impact fee waiver exemptions. Other initiatives will each need to be reviewed in greater detail, drafted in ordinance format, and presented to the BCC for final review and consideration. The table on the next page provides ary of recommendations for items A through K of Section 420.9 E b o bby0 'C3 w r y 0 y F+' G. •H'��i O O `d 40 y w " w3 pp� R V] M 4, 'o 'd bo `d .0U b4•v� 7 •--� •--� N V°, cd .M ;� ti by �L'i on.'F..i , b ul CL O A, o W u W is W *" W ., F q wtwv y 3 U ti 'o bois >, ti 7E p Ebq b ea � x b x �° o aui x y 0,40 0 � °u' o � abi n b.� V0�+ J5 r�a� ... °o5d ° o 3 " O abi p O A " aw �" 3 U.0 U U U `� Ca u " u.a Q cc PW �, w m v, a u u a 0 L a d r+ O z Q a � �d v' o w cc on cc H a a, a � � Q a' o �U d •�+~+ •,6) V] U w 44i N it W VJ �'r 'rn [� bo � U o rn 0 0 a.c .� p o -0oo 0 C „ V 3 'wC° � • ° ,o, A ° 'b.b U ou 'b .O .� ^d v •O a o o '" > c a� c .0 �r w o �° o y U ii d' W U Ca W t - IV A w U 0 • 5 �, c � • � � a°i aai • � .� '+�, y aai aai aai � W W b a� N N 0 ° 3 on on y 0 on G on a en A o > r.� -- Q 3b b �a ' 0 � � a`° O p c�i i � g 0 0 0 0 bo G aa�i G. C .`�"°, x • ° • o a CA 49 axi axi axi on o. � R'U o 0 0 �o�oa lz o�'' o 4 o�°rya O'q° - c mow° 0 O ,p O Y 78 O 0 0 0 0 O O O a �o•�, a a„ a� a� a a 0 0 0• � a s a 0 0 0 PC .a U O u u a .r. c a 0 ow a d 0 a 0 h � d Ch �+ W � d y � o a � � a � as d �U np a p O y m +,•, a Vl 1.0 O ° W y 0� O C a w u u N =0 U O� 0.v > y +U aai ts. Q U ni � 0 'b .� O "C .� ~ 0 b$oo^ 0 b'' 00. O VI M. -a Y alba y > U v� rx P. w °w' w o A g A- o'2 -u U gwE- U h t - IV r- rn 00 IV 0 0 00 10, I V 12 0 42 61 0 u Z z r- rn 00 IV AHAC RECOMMENDATION: The Affordable Housing Advisory Committee recommends that the Board of County Commissioners approve the 2025 AHAC Report, maintain the county's current affordable housing incentives, and proceed with additional revisions to the incentive as outlined in this report. EASHIP SHARP\AHACWHAC 2025WHAC Meeting 10222025WHAC 2025 Draft Report.Docx 38 49 RESOLUTION NO. 2025- A RESOLUTION OF THE INDIAN RIVER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS APPROVING THE INDIAN RIVER COUNTY AFFORDABLE HOUSING ADVISORY COMMITTEE (AHAC) 2025 REPORT AND DIRECTING STAFF TO SUBMIT THE AHAC REPORT TO FLORIDA HOUSING FINANCE CORPORATION (FHFC) WHEREAS, The County, on April 6, 1993, adopted ordinance 93-13, establishing the county's Local Housing Assistance Program pursuant to section 420.9072, Florida Statutes and Rule 67-37, F.A.C.; and WHEREAS, pursuant to revised Section 420.9076(4), F.S., each local government participating in the State Housing Initiatives Partnership (SHIP) program must prepare an Affordable Housing Advisory Committee Report that recommends to the local governing body specific actions or initiatives to encourage or facilitate affordable housing; and WHEREAS the Indian River County Affordable Housing Advisory Committee (AHAC) held a public hearing pursuant to the requirements of Section 420.9076(5), F.S., on October 22, 2025, to review the Affordable Housing Advisory Committee's 2025 Report; and WHEREAS the AHAC at the October 22, 2025 public hearing, voted to recommend that the Board of County Commissioners approve the report; and WHEREAS a copy of the Affordable Housing Advisory Committee report must be submitted to the Florida Housing Finance Corporation by December 31, 2025; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida THAT: Section 1. The above recitals are ratified in their entirety. Section 2. The attached Indian River County Affordable Housing Advisory Committee 2025 Report is hereby approved. 50 RESOLUTION NO. 2025 - Section 3. Staff are directed to submit a copy of the AHAC report to the Florida Housing Finance Corporation by December 31, 2025. The foregoing resolution was offered by Commissioner and seconded by Commissioner , and being put to a vote, the vote was as follows: Chairman, Joseph E. Flescher Vice Chairman, Deryl Loar Commissioner, Susan Adams Commissioner, Joseph H. Earman Commissioner, Laura Moss The Chairman thereupon declared the resolution duly passed and adopted this 18th day of November 2025. (Signatures on next page) 2 51 Attest by: RESOLUTION NO. 2025 - Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County Joseph E. Flescher, Chairman Ryan L. Butler, Clerk of Court and Comptroller APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGAL SUFFICIENCY Jennifer W. Shuler County Attorney 3 52 Indian River County, Florida *•ioAe MEMORANDUM File ID: 25-1064 Type: Consent Staff Report TO: Board of County Commissioners THROUGH: John A. Titkanich, Jr., County Administrator THROUGH: Brian Freeman, AICP, MPO Staff Director FROM: Mark Vietze, Senior Planner DATE: November 4, 2025 Rt SO Indian River County Administration Complex 1801 27th Street Vero Beach, Florida 32960 indianriver.gov Meeting Date: 11/18/2025 SUBJECT: Approval of a Public Transportation Grant Agreement (PTGA) with the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) for a Section 5311 Grant BACKGROUND Each year, Indian River County receives transit operating assistance under 49 USC Ch. 53, Section 5311 (also known as the Formula Grants for Rural Areas program) through the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT). These grant funds have been passed through to the Senior Resource Association (SRA), Indian River County's designated transit service provider. According to federal regulations, Formula Grants for Rural Areas funds may be used to provide transit service to rural or small urban areas. Such transit service includes fixed route service (GoLine) and demand -response service (Community Coach). ANALYSIS For FY 2025/26, $44,809 in Section 5311 funds are allocated to the County. In this case, the grant has a 50% nonfederal match requirement for operating assistance. Matching funds will consist of $22,404.50 from the state Public Transportation Block Grant and $22,404.50 from the County's normal transit allocation. No additional local funds are necessary. While Section 5311 funds are federal grant funds, FDOT administers the Section 5311 program within the state of Florida. In order to receive these funds, the BCC must enter into a Public Transportation Grant Agreement (PTGA) with FDOT, a copy of which is attached to this staff report (Attachment 2). The County receives most of its transit funding through the federal Section 5307 (Urban Area) grant program. Because a portion of Indian River County is designated as rural, the County is also eligible to receive transit funding through the Section 5311 (Rural Area) grant program. The attached resolution (Attachment 1) authorizes the Chairman of the Board of County Commissioners to execute the PTGA for Formula Grants for Indian River County, Florida Page 1 of 2 Printed on 11/13/2025 powere�y Legistar' Rural Areas funds. Upon the Board's adoption of the resolution and the Chairman's execution of the PTGA, County staff will transmit the PTGA to FDOT. Once the PTGA has been executed by FDOT, the funds will be transmitted to the County and passed along to the Senior Resource Association (SRA), the County's public transportation provider, so that the SRA can continue providing fixed route and demand -response transit service to rural areas of the county. The provision of such service is consistent with the findings of the MPO's adopted 10 -year Transit Development Plan and 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan. BUDGETARY IMPACT Grant revenue and expense, in the amount of $44,809, will be allocated via budget amendment to the General Fund /Community Transportation Coordinator/Senior Resource Association account, number 0011041-088230- 54001. These funds are part of the allocation given to the Senior Resource Association to provide transit service in the County. PREVIOUS BOARD ACTIONS The Board approved staff to apply for these Section 5311 funds at the regularly scheduled Board meeting on June 17, 2025. POTENTIAL FUTURE BOARD ACTIONS To receive the Section 5311 grant funds, the Board will need approve a Public Transportation Grant Agreement (PTGA) with FDOT at a future meeting. STRATEGIC PLAN ALIGNMENT Quality of Life OTHER PLAN ALIGNMENT The operation of the transit system is consistent with the Metropolitan Planning Organization's Transit Development Plan (TDP), which was most recently updated in 2025. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners approve the Public Transportation Grant Agreement and adopt the resolution authorizing the Chairman to sign the agreement. ATTACHMENTS 1. Authorizing Resolution for the Execution of a Public Transportation Grant Agreement 2. FDOT Public Transportation Grant Agreement Indian River County, Florida Page 2 of 2 Printed on 11/13/2025 power tom+ LegistarTm RESOLUTION NO. 2025 - A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF A PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION GRANT AGREEMENT WITH THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION. WHEREAS, Indian River County, as the designated recipient of federal and state public transportation funding, must be the recipient of those funds on behalf of the Senior Resource Association; and WHEREAS, Indian River County is eligible to receive Formula Grants for Rural Areas funding under Section 341.052(1), Florida Statutes, and under 49 USC Ch. 53, Section 5311; and WHEREAS, the Florida Department of Transportation provides Formula Grants for Rural Areas funds to Indian River County to assist in the continuance and expansion of local public transportation services. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE INDIAN RIVER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS: 1. That the Chairman of the Indian River County Board of County Commissioners is authorized to execute a Public Transportation Grant Agreement with the Florida Department of Transportation to obtain $44,809 in FY 2025/26 Formula Grants for Rural Areas (Section 5311) funds for operating assistance as part of the County's ongoing public transportation service. 2. That the Planning and Development Services Director is authorized to furnish such additional information as the Florida Department of Transportation may require in connection with the County's Rural Area Formula Grant. The foregoing Resolution was offered by Commissioner and seconded by Commissioner , and, upon being put to a vote, the vote was as follows: Commissioner Susan Adams Commissioner Joseph H. Earman Commissioner Joseph E. Flescher Commissioner Deryl Loar Commissioner Laura Moss The Chairman thereupon declared the Resolution duly passed and adopted this 18' day of November 2025. Page 1 of 2 55 RESOLUTION NO. 2025 - Attest: Ryan L. Butler, Clerk of Court and Comptroller By Deputy Clerk Approved as to form and legal sufficiency: Susan J. Prado, Deputy County Attorney INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS By Chairman Page 2 of 2 56 Financial Project Number(s): (item -segment -phase -sequence) 407182-4-84-01 Contract Number: CFDA Number: CFDA Title: CSFA Number: CSFA Title: STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION GRANT AGREEMENT Fund(s): Form 725-000-01 STRATEGIC DEVELOPMENT OGC 03125 DU, LF FLAIR Category: 088774 Work Activity Code/Function: 215 Object Code: Federal Award FL-2025- Org. Code: 780000 55042010429 Identification Number (FAIN) — Transit only: Vendor Number: F596000674022 091-00 G3K05 Federal Award Date: 10/14/2025 20.509 Agency UEI Number: FB3SLJJZ38K9 Formula Grants for Rural Areas N/A N/A THIS PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION GRANT AGREEMENT ("Agreement") is entered into , by and between the State of Florida, Department of Transportation, ("Department"), and Indian River County BOCC, ("Agency"). The Department and the Agency are sometimes referred to in this Agreement as a "Party" and collectively as the "Parties." NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual benefits to be derived from joint participation on the Project, the Parties agree to the following: 1. Authority. The Agency, by Resolution or other form of official authorization, a copy of which is attached as Exhibit "D", Agency Resolution and made a part of this Agreement, has authorized its officers to execute this Agreement on its behalf. The Department has the authority pursuant to Section(s) 341.051, Florida Statutes, to enter into this Agreement. 2. Purpose of Agreement. The purpose of this Agreement is to provide for the Department's participation in Operating Assistance to continue the fixed route services to Fellsmere, FL via Goline Rout 10, as further described in Exhibit "A", Project Description and Responsibilities, attached and incorporated into this Agreement ("Project"), to provide Department financial assistance to the Agency, state the terms and conditions upon which Department funds will be provided, and to set forth the manner in which the Project will be undertaken and completed. 3. Program Area. For identification purposes only, this Agreement is implemented as part of the Department program area selected below (select all programs that apply): _ Aviation _ Seaports X Transit _ Intermodal Rail Crossing Closure Match to Direct Federal Funding (Aviation or Transit) (Note: Section 15 and Exhibit G do not apply to federally matched funding) Other 4. Exhibits. The following Exhibits are attached and incorporated into this Agreement: X Exhibit A: Project Description and Responsibilities X Exhibit B: Schedule of Financial Assistance _ *Exhibit B1: Deferred Reimbursement Financial Provisions X *Exhibit B2: Advance Payment Financial Provisions *Exhibit B3: Alternative Advanced Pay (Transit Bus Program) *Exhibit C: Terms and Conditions of Construction X Exhibit D: Agency Resolution X_ Exhibit E: Program Specific Terms and Conditions X Exhibit E1: Prohibition Based on Health Care Choices 57 Page 1 of 31 STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Form 725-000-01 PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION STRATEGIC DEVELOPMENT GRANT AGREEMENT OGC 03/25 X Exhibit E2: Exterior Vehicle Wrap, Tinting, Paint, Marketing and Advertising (Transit) X Exhibit F: Contract Payment Requirements _ *Exhibit G: Audit Requirements for Awards of State Financial Assistance X *Exhibit H: Audit Requirements for Awards of Federal Financial Assistance *Exhibit I: Certification of Disbursement of Payment to Vehicle and/or Equipment Vendor *Additional Exhibit(s): *Indicates that the Exhibit is only attached and incorporated if applicable box is selected. 5. Time. Unless specified otherwise, all references to "days" within this Agreement refer to calendar days. 6. Tenn of Agreement. This Agreement shall commence upon full execution by both Parties ("Effective Date") and continue through December 31, 2026. If the Agency does not complete the Project within this time period, this Agreement will expire unless an extension of the time period is requested by the Agency and granted in writing by the Department prior to the expiration of this Agreement. Expiration of this Agreement will be considered termination of the Project. The cost of any work performed prior to the Effective Date or after the expiration date of this Agreement will not be reimbursed by the Department. a. _ If this box is checked the following provision applies: Unless terminated earlier, work on the Project shall commence no later than the _ day of _, or within _ days of the issuance of the Notice to Proceed for the construction phase of the Project (if the Project involves construction), whichever date is earlier. The Department shall have the option to immediately terminate this Agreement should the Agency fail to meet the above -required dates. 7. Amendments, Extensions, and Assignment. This Agreement may be amended or extended upon mutual written agreement of the Parties. This Agreement shall not be renewed. This Agreement shall not be assigned, transferred, or otherwise encumbered by the Agency under any circumstances without the prior written consent of the Department. 8. Termination or Suspension of Project. The Department may, by written notice to the Agency, suspend any or all of the Department's obligations under this Agreement for the Agency's failure to comply with applicable law or the terms of this Agreement until such time as the event or condition resulting in such suspension has ceased or been corrected. a. Notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, if the Department intends to terminate the Agreement, the Department shall notify the Agency of such termination in writing at least thirty (30) days prior to the termination of the Agreement, with instructions to the effective date of termination or specify the stage of work at which the Agreement is to be terminated. b. The Parties to this Agreement may terminate this Agreement when its continuation would not produce beneficial results commensurate with the further expenditure of funds. In this event, the Parties shall agree upon the termination conditions. c. If the Agreement is terminated before performance is completed, the Agency shall be paid only for that work satisfactorily performed for which costs can be substantiated. Such payment, however, may not exceed the equivalent percentage of the Department's maximum financial assistance. If any portion of the Project is located on the Department's right-of-way, then all work in progress on the Department right-of-way will become the property of the Department and will be turned over promptly by the Agency. d. In the event the Agency fails to perform or honor the requirements and provisions of this Agreement, the Agency shall promptly refund in full to the Department within thirty (30) days of the termination of the Agreement any funds that were determined by the Department to have been expended in violation of the Agreement. 58 Page 2 of 31 STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Form 725.000-01 PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION STRATEGIC DEVELOPMENT GRANT AGREEMENT OGC 03125 e. The Department reserves the right to unilaterally cancel this Agreement for failure by the Agency to comply with the Public Records provisions of Chapter 119, Florida Statutes. 9. Project Cost: a. The estimated total cost of the Project is $89,618. This amount is based upon Exhibit "B", Schedule of Financial Assistance. The timeline for deliverables and distribution of estimated amounts between deliverables within a grant phase, as outlined in Exhibit "B", Schedule of Financial Assistance, may be modified by mutual written agreement of the Parties and does not require execution of an Amendment to the Public Transportation Grant Agreement. The timeline for deliverables and distribution of estimated amounts between grant phases requires an amendment executed by both Parties in the same form as this Agreement. b. The Department agrees to participate in the Project cost up to the maximum amount of $44,809 and, the Department's participation in the Project shall not exceed 50.00% of the total eligible cost of the Project and as more fully described in Exhibit "B", Schedule of Financial Assistance. The Agency agrees to bear all expenses in excess of the amount of the Department's participation and any cost overruns or deficits involved. 10. Compensation and Payment: a. Eligible Cost. The Department shall reimburse the Agency for allowable costs incurred as described in Exhibit "A", Project Description and Responsibilities, and as set forth in Exhibit "B", Schedule of Financial Assistance. Deliverables. The Agency shall provide quantifiable, measurable, and verifiable units of deliverables. Each deliverable must specify the required minimum level of service to be performed and the criteria for evaluating successful completion. The Project and the quantifiable, measurable, and verifiable units of deliverables are described more fully in Exhibit "A", Project Description and Responsibilities. Modifications to the deliverables in Exhibit "A", Project Description and Responsibilities requires a formal written amendment. c. Invoicing. Invoices shall be submitted no more often than monthly by the Agency in detail sufficient for a proper pre -audit and post -audit, based on the quantifiable, measurable, and verifiable deliverables as established in Exhibit "A", Project Description and Responsibilities. Deliverables and costs incurred must be received and approved by the Department prior to reimbursement. Requests for reimbursement by the Agency shall include an invoice, progress report, and supporting documentation for the deliverables being billed that are acceptable to the Department. The Agency shall use the format for the invoice and progress report that is approved by the Department. d. Supporting Documentation. Supporting documentation must establish that the deliverables were received and accepted in writing by the Agency and must also establish that the required minimum standards or level of service to be performed based on the criteria for evaluating successful completion as specified in Exhibit "A", Project Description and Responsibilities has been met. All costs invoiced shall be supported by properly executed payrolls, time records, invoices, contracts, or vouchers evidencing in proper detail the nature and propriety of charges as described in Exhibit "F", Contract Payment Requirements. e. Travel Expenses. The selected provision below is controlling regarding travel expenses X Travel expenses are NOT eligible for reimbursement under this Agreement. 59 Page 3 of 31 STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Form 725-000-01 PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION STRATEGIC DEVELOPMENT GRANT AGREEMENT OGC 03125 Travel expenses ARE eligible for reimbursement under this Agreement. Bills for travel expenses specifically authorized in this Agreement shall be submitted on the Department's Contractor Travel Form No. 300-000-06 and will be paid in accordance with Section 112.061, Florida Statutes, and the most current version of the Department's Disbursement Handbook for Employees and Managers. Financial Consequences. Payment shall be made only after receipt and approval of deliverables and costs incurred unless advance payments are authorized by the Chief Financial Officer of the State of Florida under Chapters 215 and 216, Florida Statutes, or the Department's Comptroller under Section 334.044(29), Florida Statutes. If the Department determines that the performance of the Agency is unsatisfactory, the Department shall notify the Agency of the deficiency to be corrected, which correction shall be made within a time- frame to be specified by the Department. The Agency shall, within thirty (30) days after notice from the Department, provide the Department with a corrective action plan describing how the Agency will address all issues of contract non-performance, unacceptable performance, failure to meet the minimum performance levels, deliverable deficiencies, or contract non- compliance. If the corrective action plan is unacceptable to the Department, the Agency will not be reimbursed. If the deficiency is subsequently resolved, the Agency may bill the Department for the amount that was previously not reimbursed during the next billing period. If the Agency is unable to resolve the deficiency, the funds shall be forfeited at the end of the Agreement's term. g. Invoice Processing. An Agency receiving financial assistance from the Department should be aware of the following time frames. Inspection or verification and approval of deliverables shall take no longer than 20 days from the Department's receipt of the invoice. The Department has 20 days to deliver a request for payment (voucher) to the Department of Financial Services. The 20 days are measured from the latter of the date the invoice is received or the deliverables are received, inspected or verified, and approved. If a payment is not available within 40 days, a separate interest penalty at a rate as established pursuant to Section 55.03(1), Florida Statutes, will be due and payable, in addition to the invoice amount, to the Agency. Interest penalties of less than one (1) dollar will not be enforced unless the Agency requests payment. Invoices that have to be returned to an Agency because of Agency preparation errors will result in a delay in the payment. The invoice payment requirements do not start until a properly completed invoice is provided to the Department. A Vendor Ombudsman has been established within the Department of Financial Services. The duties of this individual include acting as an advocate for Agency who may be experiencing problems in obtaining timely payment(s) from a state agency. The Vendor Ombudsman may be contacted at (850) 413-5516. Records Retention. The Agency shall maintain an accounting system or separate accounts to ensure funds and projects are tracked separately. Records of costs incurred under the terms of this Agreement shall be maintained and made available upon request to the Department at all times during the period of this Agreement and for five years after final payment is made. Copies of these records shall be furnished to the Department upon request. Records of costs incurred include the Agency's general accounting records and the Project records, together with supporting documents and records, of the Contractor and all subcontractors performing work on the Project, and all other records of the Contractor and subcontractors considered necessary by the Department for a proper audit of costs. L Progress Reports. Upon request, the Agency agrees to provide progress reports to the Department in the standard format used by the Department and at intervals established by the Department. The Department will be entitled at all times to be advised, at its request, as to the status of the Project and of details thereof. 60 Page 4 of 31 STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Form 725-000-01 PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION STRATEGIC DEVELOPMENT GRANT AGREEMENT OGC 03125 j. Submission of Other Documents. The Agency shall submit to the Department such data, reports, records, contracts, and other documents relating to the Project as the Department may require as listed in Exhibit "E", Program Specific Terms and Conditions attached to and incorporated into this Agreement. k. Offsets for Claims. If, after Project completion, any claim is made by the Department resulting from an audit or for work or services performed pursuant to this Agreement, the Department may offset such amount from payments due for work or services done under any agreement that it has with the Agency owing such amount if, upon written demand, payment of the amount is not made within 60 days to the Department. Offsetting any amount pursuant to this paragraph shall not be considered a breach of contract by the Department. I. Final Invoice. The Agency must submit the final invoice on the Project to the Department within 120 days after the completion of the Project. Invoices submitted after the 120 -day time period may not be paid. m. Department's Performance and Payment Contingent Upon Annual Appropriation by the Legislature. The Department's performance and obligation to pay under this Agreement is contingent upon an annual appropriation by the Legislature. If the Department's funding for this Project is in multiple fiscal years, a notice of availability of funds from the Department's project manager must be received prior to costs being incurred by the Agency. See Exhibit "B", Schedule of Financial Assistance for funding levels by fiscal year. Project costs utilizing any fiscal year funds are not eligible for reimbursement if incurred prior to funds approval being received. The Department will notify the Agency, in writing, when funds are available. n. Limits on Contracts Exceeding $25,000 and Term more than 1 Year. In the event this Agreement is in excess of $25,000 and has a term for a period of more than one year, the provisions of Section 339.135(6)(a), Florida Statutes, are hereby incorporated: "The Department, during any fiscal year, shall not expend money, incur any liability, or enter into any contract which, by its terms, involves the expenditure of money in excess of the amounts budgeted as available for expenditure during such fiscal year. Any contract, verbal or written, made in violation of this subsection is null and void, and no money may be paid on such contract. The Department shall require a statement from the comptroller of the Department that funds are available prior to entering into any such contract or other binding commitment of funds. Nothing herein contained shall prevent the making of contracts for periods exceeding 1 year, but any contract so made shall be executory only for the value of the services to be rendered or agreed to be paid for in succeeding fiscal years; and this paragraph shall be incorporated verbatim in all contracts of the Department which are for an amount in excess of $25,000 and which have a term for a period of more than 1 year." o. Agency Obligation to Refund Department. Any Project funds made available by the Department pursuant to this Agreement that are determined by the Department to have been expended by the Agency in violation of this Agreement or any other applicable law or regulation shall be promptly refunded in full to the Department. Acceptance by the Department of any documentation or certifications, mandatory or otherwise permitted, that the Agency files shall not constitute a waiver of the Department's rights as the funding agency to verify all information at a later date by audit or investigation. p. Non -Eligible Costs. In determining the amount of the payment, the Department will exclude all Project costs incurred by the Agency prior to the execution of this Agreement, costs incurred 61 Page 5 of 31 STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Form 725-000-01 PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION STRATEGIC DEVELOPMENT GRANT AGREEMENT OGC 03125 after the expiration of the Agreement, costs that are not provided for in Exhibit "A", Project Description and Responsibilities, and as set forth in Exhibit "B", Schedule of Financial Assistance, costs agreed to be borne by the Agency or its contractors and subcontractors for not meeting the Project commencement and final invoice time lines, and costs attributable to goods or services received under a contract or other arrangement that has not been approved in writing by the Department. Specific unallowable costs may be listed in Exhibit "A", Project Description and Responsibilities. 11. General Requirements. The Agency shall complete the Project with all practical dispatch in a sound, economical, and efficient manner, and in accordance with the provisions in this Agreement and all applicable laws. a. Necessary Permits Certification. The Agency shall certify to the Department that the Agency's design consultant and/or construction contractor has secured the necessary permits. b. Right -of -Way Certification. If the Project involves construction, then the Agency shall provide to the Department certification and a copy of appropriate documentation substantiating that all required right-of-way necessary for the Project has been obtained. Certification is required prior to authorization for advertisement for or solicitation of bids for construction of the Project, even if no right-of-way is required. c. Notification Requirements When Performing Construction on Department's Right -of - Way. In the event the cost of the Project is greater than $250,000.00, and the Project involves construction on the Department's right-of-way, the Agency shall provide the Department with written notification of either its intent to: Require the construction work of the Project that is on the Department's right-of-way to be performed by a Department prequalified contractor, or Construct the Project utilizing existing Agency employees, if the Agency can complete said Project within the time frame set forth in this Agreement. d. —If this box is checked, then the Agency is permitted to utilize its own forces and the following provision applies: Use of Agency Workforce. In the event the Agency proceeds with any phase of the Project utilizing its own forces, the Agency will only be reimbursed for direct costs (this excludes general overhead). e. _ If this box is checked, then the Agency is permitted to utilize Indirect Costs: Reimbursement for Indirect Program Expenses (select one): i. _Agency has selected to seek reimbursement from the Department for actual indirect expenses (no rate). ii. —Agency has selected to apply a de minimus rate of 15% to modified total direct costs. Note: The de minimus rate is available only to entities that have never had a negotiated indirect cost rate. When selected, the de minimus rate must be used consistently for all federal awards until such time the agency chooses to negotiate a rate. A cost policy statement and de minimis certification form must be submitted to the Department for review and approval. iii. _ Agency has selected to apply a state or federally approved indirect cost rate. A federally approved rate agreement or indirect cost allocation plan (ICAP) must be submitted annually. f. Agency Compliance with Laws, Rules, and Regulations, Guidelines, and Standards. The Agency shall comply and require its contractors and subcontractors to comply with all terms 62 Page 6 of 31 STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Form 725-000-01 PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION STRATEGIC DEVELOPMENT GRANT AGREEMENT OGC 03125 and conditions of this Agreement and all federal, state, and local laws and regulations applicable to this Project. g. Claims and Requests for Additional Work. The Agency shall have the sole responsibility for resolving claims and requests for additional work for the Project. The Agency will make best efforts to obtain the Department's input in its decisions. The Department is not obligated to reimburse for claims or requests for additional work. 12. Contracts of the Agency: a. Approval of Third Party Contracts. The Department specifically reserves the right to review and approve any and all third party contracts with respect to the Project before the Agency executes or obligates itself in any manner requiring the disbursement of Department funds, including consultant and purchase of commodities contracts, or amendments thereto. If the Department chooses to review and approve third party contracts for this Project and the Agency fails to obtain such approval, that shall be sufficient cause for nonpayment by the Department. The Department specifically reserves unto itself the right to review the qualifications of any consultant or contractor and to approve or disapprove the employment of the same. If Federal Transit Administration (FTA) funds are used in the Project, the Department must exercise the right to third party contract review. b. Procurement of Commodities or Contractual Services. It is understood and agreed by the Parties hereto that participation by the Department in a project with the Agency, where said project involves the purchase of commodities or contractual services where purchases or costs exceed the Threshold Amount for CATEGORY TWO per Section 287.017, Florida Statutes, is contingent on the Agency complying in full with the provisions of Section 287.057, Florida Statutes. The Agency's Authorized Official shall certify to the Department that the Agency's purchase of commodities or contractual services has been accomplished in compliance with Section 287.057, Florida Statutes. It shall be the sole responsibility of the Agency to ensure that any obligations made in accordance with this Section comply with the current threshold limits. Contracts, purchase orders, task orders, construction change orders, or any other agreement that would result in exceeding the current budget contained in Exhibit "B", Schedule of Financial Assistance, or that is not consistent with the Project description and scope of services contained in Exhibit "A", Project Description and Responsibilities must be approved by the Department prior to Agency execution. Failure to obtain such approval, and subsequent execution of an amendment to the Agreement if required, shall be sufficient cause for nonpayment by the Department, in accordance with this Agreement. c. Consultants' Competitive Negotiation Act. It is understood and agreed by the Parties to this Agreement that participation by the Department in a project with the Agency, where said project involves a consultant contract for professional services, is contingent on the Agency's full compliance with provisions of Section 287.055, Florida Statutes, Consultants' Competitive Negotiation Act. In all cases, the Agency's Authorized Official shall certify to the Department that selection has been accomplished in compliance with the Consultants' Competitive Negotiation Act. d. Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE) Policy and Obligation. It is the policy of the Department that DBEs, as defined in 49 C.F.R. Part 26, as amended, shall have the opportunity to participate in the performance of contracts financed in whole or in part with Department funds under this Agreement. The DBE requirements of applicable federal and state laws and regulations apply to this Agreement. The Agency and its contractors agree to ensure that DBEs have the opportunity to participate in the performance of this Agreement. In this regard, all recipients and contractors shall take all necessary and reasonable steps in accordance with applicable federal and state laws and regulations to ensure that the DBEs have the opportunity to compete for and perform contracts. The Agency and its contractors 63 Page 7 of 31 STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Forth 725.000-01 PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION STRATEGIC DEVELOPMENT GRANT AGREEMENT OGC 03/25 and subcontractors shall not discriminate on the basis of race, color, national origin or sex in the award and performance of contracts, entered pursuant to this Agreement. 13. Maintenance Obligations. In the event the Project includes construction or the acquisition of commodities then the following provisions are incorporated into this Agreement: a. The Agency agrees to accept all future maintenance and other attendant costs occurring after completion of the Project for all improvements constructed or commodities acquired as part of the Project. The terms of this provision shall survive the termination of this Agreement. 14. Sale, Transfer, or Disposal of Department -funded Property: a. The Agency will not sell or otherwise transfer or dispose of any part of its title or other interests in real property, facilities, or equipment funded in any part by the Department under this Agreement without prior written approval by the Department. b. If a sale, transfer, or disposal by the Agency of all or a portion of Department -funded real property, facilities, or equipment is approved by the Department, the following provisions will apply: The Agency shall reimburse the Department a proportional amount of the proceeds of the sale of any Department -funded property. The proportional amount shall be determined on the basis of the ratio of the Department funding of the development or acquisition of the property multiplied against the sale amount, and shall be remitted to the Department within ninety (90) days of closing of sale. Sale of property developed or acquired with Department funds shall be at market value as determined by appraisal or public bidding process, and the contract and process for sale must be approved in advance by the Department. iv. If any portion of the proceeds from the sale to the Agency are non-cash considerations, reimbursement to the Department shall include a proportional amount based on the value of the non-cash considerations. c. The terms of provisions "a" and "b" above shall survive the termination of this Agreement. i. The terms shall remain in full force and effect throughout the useful life of facilities developed, equipment acquired, or Project items installed within a facility, but shall not exceed twenty (20) years from the effective date of this Agreement. ii. There shall be no limit on the duration of the terms with respect to real property acquired with Department funds. 15. Single Audit. The administration of Federal or State resources awarded through the Department to the Agency by this Agreement may be subject to audits and/or monitoring by the Department. The following requirements do not limit the authority of the Department to conduct or arrange for the conduct of additional audits or evaluations of Federal awards or State financial assistance or limit the authority of any state agency inspector general, the State of Florida Auditor General, or any other state official. The Agency shall comply with all audit and audit reporting requirements as specified below. Federal Funded: a. In addition to reviews of audits conducted in accordance with 2 CFR Part 200, Subpart F — Audit Requirements, monitoring procedures may include but not be limited to on-site visits by 64 Page 8 of 31 STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Form 725-000-01 PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION STRATEGIC DEVELOPMENT GRANT AGREEMENT OGc 03125 Department staff and/or other procedures, including reviewing any required performance and financial reports, following up, ensuring corrective action, and issuing management decisions on weaknesses found through audits when those findings pertain to Federal awards provided through the Department by this Agreement. By entering into this Agreement, the Agency agrees to comply and cooperate fully with any monitoring procedures/processes deemed appropriate by the Department. The Agency further agrees to comply and cooperate with any inspections, reviews, investigations, or audits deemed necessary by the Department, State of Florida Chief Financial Officer (CFO), or State of Florida Auditor General. b. The Agency, a non -Federal entity as defined by 2 CFR Part 200, Subpart F — Audit Requirements, as a subrecipient of a Federal award awarded by the Department through this Agreement, is subject to the following requirements: In the event the Agency expends a total amount of Federal awards equal to or in excess of the threshold established by 2 CFR Part 200, Subpart F — Audit Requirements, the Agency must have a Federal single or program -specific audit conducted for such fiscal year in accordance with the provisions of 2 CFR Part 200, Subpart F — Audit Requirements. Exhibit "H", Audit Requirements for Awards of Federal Financial Assistance, to this Agreement provides the required Federal award identification information needed by the Agency to further comply with the requirements of 2 CFR Part 200, Subpart F — Audit Requirements. In determining Federal awards expended in a fiscal year, the Agency must consider all sources of Federal awards based on when the activity related to the Federal award occurs, including the Federal award provided through the Department by this Agreement. The determination of amounts of Federal awards expended should be in accordance with the guidelines established by 2 CFR Part 200, Subpart F — Audit Requirements. An audit conducted by the State of Florida Auditor General in accordance with the provisions of 2 CFR Part 200, Subpart F — Audit Requirements, will meet the requirements of this part. ii. In connection with the audit requirements, the Agency shall fulfill the requirements relative to the auditee responsibilities as provided in 2 CFR Part 200, Subpart F — Audit Requirements. iii. In the event the Agency expends less than the threshold established by 2 CFR Part 200, Subpart F — Audit Requirements, in Federal awards, the Agency is exempt from Federal audit requirements for that fiscal year. However, the Agency must provide a single audit exemption statement to the Department at FDOTSingleAudit(d-)dot.state.fl.us no later than nine months after the end of the Agency's audit period for each applicable audit year. In the event the Agency expends less than the threshold established by 2 CFR Part 200, Subpart F — Audit Requirements, in Federal awards in a fiscal year and elects to have an audit conducted in accordance with the provisions of 2 CFR Part 200, Subpart F — Audit Requirements, the cost of the audit must be paid from non -Federal resources (i.e., the cost of such an audit must be paid from the Agency's resources obtained from other than Federal entities). iv. The Agency must electronically submit to the Federal Audit Clearinghouse (FAC) at https://harvester.census.gov/facweb/ the audit reporting package as required by 2 CFR Part 200, Subpart F — Audit Requirements, within the earlier of 30 calendar days after receipt of the auditor's report(s) or nine months after the end of the audit period. The FAC is the repository of record for audits required by 2 CFR Part 200, Subpart F — Audit Requirements. However, the Department requires a copy of the audit reporting package also be submitted to FDOTSingleAudit(a)dot.state.fl.us within the earlier of 30 calendar days after receipt of the auditor's report(s) or nine months after the end of the audit period as required by 2 CFR Part 200, Subpart F — Audit Requirements. 65 Page 9 of 31 STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Form 725.000-01 PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION STRATEGIC DEVELOPMENT GRANT AGREEMENT OGC 03125 v. Within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the FAC, the Department will review the Agency's audit reporting package, including corrective action plans and management letters, to the extent necessary to determine whether timely and appropriate action on all deficiencies has been taken pertaining to the Federal award provided through the Department by this Agreement. If the Agency fails to have an audit conducted in accordance with 2 CFR Part 200, Subpart F — Audit Requirements, the Department may impose additional conditions to remedy noncompliance. If the Department determines that noncompliance cannot be remedied by imposing additional conditions, the Department may take appropriate actions to enforce compliance, which actions may include but not be limited to the following: 1. Temporarily withhold cash payments pending correction of the deficiency by the Agency or more severe enforcement action by the Department; 2. Disallow (deny both use of funds and any applicable matching credit for) all or part of the cost of the activity or action not in compliance; 3. Wholly or partly suspend or terminate the Federal award; 4. Initiate suspension or debarment proceedings as authorized under 2 C.F.R. Part 180 and Federal awarding agency regulations (or in the case of the Department, recommend such a proceeding be initiated by the Federal awarding agency); 5. Withhold further Federal awards for the Project or program,- 6. rogram;6. Take other remedies that may be legally available. vi. As a condition of receiving this Federal award, the Agency shall permit the Department or its designee, the CFO, or State of Florida Auditor General access to the Agency's records, including financial statements, the independent auditor's working papers, and project records as necessary. Records related to unresolved audit findings, appeals, or litigation shall be retained until the action is complete or the dispute is resolved. vii. The Department's contact information for requirements under this part is as follows: Office of Comptroller, MS 24 605 Suwannee Street Tallahassee, Florida 32399-0450 FDOTS ingleAuditadot.stateftus State Funded: a. In addition to reviews of audits conducted in accordance with Section 215.97, Florida Statutes, monitoring procedures to monitor the Agency's use of state financial assistance may include but not be limited to on-site visits by Department staff and/or other procedures, including reviewing any required performance and financial reports, following up, ensuring corrective action, and issuing management decisions on weaknesses found through audits when those findings pertain to state financial assistance awarded through the Department by this Agreement. By entering into this Agreement, the Agency agrees to comply and cooperate fully with any monitoring procedures/processes deemed appropriate by the Department. The Agency further agrees to comply and cooperate with any inspections, reviews, investigations, or audits deemed necessary by the Department, the Department of Financial Services (DFS), or State of Florida Auditor General. b. The Agency, a "nonstate entity" as defined by Section 215.97, Florida Statutes, as a recipient of state financial assistance awarded by the Department through this Agreement, is subject to the following requirements: 66 Page 10 of 31 STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Form 725-000-01 PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION STRATEGIC DEVELOPMENT GRANT AGREEMENT OGC 03125 In the event the Agency meets the audit threshold requirements established by Section 215.97, Florida Statutes, the Agency must have a State single or project - specific audit conducted for such fiscal year in accordance with Section 215.97, Florida Statutes; applicable rules of the Department of Financial Services; and Chapters 10.550 (local governmental entities) or 10.650 (nonprofit and for-profit organizations), Rules of the Auditor General. Exhibit "G", Audit Requirements for Awards of State Financial Assistance, to this Agreement indicates state financial assistance awarded through the Department by this Agreement needed by the Agency to further comply with the requirements of Section 215.97, Florida Statutes. In determining the state financial assistance expended in a fiscal year, the Agency shall consider all sources of state financial assistance, including state financial assistance received from the Department by this Agreement, other state agencies, and other nonstate entities. State financial assistance does not include Federal direct or pass-through awards and resources received by a nonstate entity for Federal program matching requirements. ii. In connection with the audit requirements, the Agency shall ensure that the audit complies with the requirements of Section 215.97(8), Florida Statutes. This includes submission of a financial reporting package as defined by Section 215.97(2)(e), Florida Statutes, and Chapters 10.550 (local governmental entities) or 10.650 (nonprofit and for-profit organizations), Rules of the Auditor General. iii. In the event the Agency does not meet the audit threshold requirements established by Section 215.97, Florida Statutes, the Agency is exempt for such fiscal year from the state single audit requirements of Section 215.97, Florida Statutes. However, the Agency must provide a single audit exemption statement to the Department at FDOTSingleAudit(cDdot.state.fl.us no later than nine months after the end of the Agency's audit period for each applicable audit year. In the event the Agency does not meet the audit threshold requirements established by Section 215.97, Florida Statutes, in a fiscal year and elects to have an audit conducted in accordance with the provisions of Section 215.97, Florida Statutes, the cost of the audit must be paid from the Agency's resources (i.e., the cost of such an audit must be paid from the Agency's resources obtained from other than State entities). iv. In accordance with Chapters 10.550 (local governmental entities) or 10.650 (nonprofit and for-profit organizations), Rules of the Auditor General, copies of financial reporting packages required by this Agreement shall be submitted to: Florida Department of Transportation Office of Comptroller, MS 24 605 Suwannee Street Tallahassee, Florida 32399-0405 FDOTSingleAudit(cbdot.state.fl.us And State of Florida Auditor General Local Government Audits/342 111 West Madison Street, Room 401 Tallahassee, FL 32399-1450 Email: flaudgen localgovt(a)aud.state.fl.us V. Any copies of financial reporting packages, reports, or other information required to be submitted to the Department shall be submitted timely in accordance with Section 215.97, Florida Statutes, and Chapters 10.550 (local governmental entities) or 10.650 (nonprofit and for-profit organizations), Rules of the Auditor General, as 67 Page 11 of 31 STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Form 725-000-01 PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION STRATEGIC DEVELOPMENT GRANT AGREEMENT OGC 03/25 applicable. vi. The Agency, when submitting financial reporting packages to the Department for audits done in accordance with Chapters 10.550 (local governmental entities) or 10.650 (nonprofit and for-profit organizations), Rules of the Auditor General, should indicate the date the reporting package was delivered to the Agency in correspondence accompanying the reporting package. vii. Upon receipt, and within six months, the Department will review the Agency's financial reporting package, including corrective action plans and management letters, to the extent necessary to determine whether timely and appropriate corrective action on all deficiencies has been taken pertaining to the state financial assistance provided through the Department by this Agreement. If the Agency fails to have an audit conducted consistent with Section 215.97, Florida Statutes, the Department may take appropriate corrective action to enforce compliance. viii. As a condition of receiving state financial assistance, the Agency shall permit the Department or its designee, DFS, or the Auditor General access to the Agency's records, including financial statements, the independent auditor's working papers, and project records as necessary. Records related to unresolved audit findings, appeals, or litigation shall be retained until the action is complete or the dispute is resolved. c. The Agency shall retain sufficient records demonstrating its compliance with the terms of this Agreement for a period of five years from the date the audit report is issued and shall allow the Department or its designee, DFS, or State of Florida Auditor General access to such records upon request. The Agency shall ensure that the audit working papers are made available to the Department or its designee, DFS, or State of Florida Auditor General upon request for a period of five years from the date the audit report is issued, unless extended in writing by the Department. 16. Notices and Approvals. Notices and approvals referenced in this Agreement must be obtained in writing from the Parties' respective Administrators or their designees. 17. Restrictions, Prohibitions, Controls and Labor Provisions: a. Convicted Vendor List. A person or affiliate who has been placed on the convicted vendor list following a conviction for a public entity crime may not submit a bid on a contract to provide any goods or services to a public entity; may not submit a bid on a contract with a public entity for the construction or repair of a public building or public work; may not submit bids on leases of real property to a public entity; may not be awarded or perform work as a contractor, supplier, subcontractor, or consultant under a contract with any public entity; and may not transact business with any public entity in excess of the threshold amount provided in Section 287.017, Florida Statutes, for CATEGORY TWO for a period of 36 months from the date of being placed on the convicted vendor list. b. Discriminatory Vendor List. In accordance with Section 287.134, Florida Statutes, an entity or affiliate who has been placed on the Discriminatory Vendor List, kept by the Florida Department of Management Services, may not submit a bid on a contract to provide goods or services to a public entity; may not submit a bid on a contract with a public entity for the construction or repair of a public building or public work; may not submit bids on leases of real property to a public entity; may not be awarded or perform work as a contractor, supplier, subcontractor, or consultant under a contract with any public entity; and may not transact business with any public entity. 68 Page 12 of 31 STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Form 725-000-01 PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION STRATEGIC DEVELOPMENT GRANT AGREEMENT OGC 03/25 c. Non -Responsible Contractors. An entity or affiliate who has had its Certificate of Qualification suspended, revoked, denied, or have further been determined by the Department to be a non -responsible contractor, may not submit a bid or perform work for the construction or repair of a public building or public work on a contract with the Agency. d. Prohibition on Using Funds for Lobbying. No funds received pursuant to this Agreement may be expended for lobbying the Florida Legislature, judicial branch, or any state agency, in accordance with Section 216.347, Florida Statutes. e. Unauthorized Aliens. The Department shall consider the employment by any contractor of unauthorized aliens a violation of Section 274A(e) of the Immigration and Nationality Act. If the contractor knowingly employs unauthorized aliens, such violation will be cause for unilateral cancellation of this Agreement. f. Procurement of Construction Services. If the Project is procured pursuant to Chapter 255, Florida Statutes, for construction services and at the time of the competitive solicitation for the Project, 50 percent or more of the cost of the Project is to be paid from state -appropriated funds, then the Agency must comply with the requirements of Section 255.0991, Florida Statutes. E -Verify. The Agency shall: I. Utilize the U.S. Department of Homeland Security's E -Verify system to verify the employment eligibility of all new employees hired by the Agency during the term of the contract; and ii. Expressly require any subcontractors performing work or providing services pursuant to the state contract to likewise utilize the U.S. Department of Homeland Security's E - Verify system to verify the employment eligibility of all new employees hired by the subcontractor during the contract term. h. Projects with Non-profit Organizations. Pursuant to Section 216.1366. Florida Statutes, if the Agency is a nonprofit organization as defined in Section 215.97(2)(m), Florida Statutes, the Agency shall provide documentation to indicate the amount of state funds: I. Allocated to be used during the full term of this Agreement for remuneration to any member of the board of directors or an officer of the Agency ii. Allocated under each payment by the Department to be used for remuneration of any member of the board of directors or an officer of the Agency. The documentation must indicate the amounts and recipients of the remuneration. Such information will be posted by the Department to the Florida Accountability Contract Tracking System maintained pursuant to Section 215.985, F.S., and must additionally be posted to the Agency's website, if the Agency is a non-profit organization and maintains a website. The Agency shall utilize the Department's Form 350-090-19, Compensation to Non - Profits Using State Funds, for purposes of documenting the compensation. The subject Form is required for every contract for services executed, amended, or extended on or after July 1, 2023, with non-profit organizations. Pursuant to Section 216.1366, F.S., the term: i. "Officer' means a chief executive officer, chief financial officer, chief operating officer, or any other position performing and equivalent function. 69 Page 13 of 31 STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Form 725-000-01 PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION STRATEGIC DEVELOPMENT GRANT AGREEMENT OGC 03/25 ii. "Remuneration" means all compensation earned by or awarded to personnel, whether paid or accrued, regardless of contingency, including bonuses, accrued paid time off, severance payments, incentive payments, contributions to a retirement plan or in-kind payments, reimbursements, or allowances for moving expenses, vehicles and other transportation, telephone services, medical services, housing and meals. iii. "State Funds" means funds paid from the General Revenue Fund or any state trust fund, funds allocated by the Federal Government and distributed by the state, or funds appropriated by the Federal Government and distributed by the state, or funds appropriated by the state for distribution through any grant program. The term does not include funds used for the Medicaid program. L Design Services and Construction Engineering and Inspection Services. If the Project is wholly or partially funded by the Department and administered by a local governmental entity, except for a seaport listed in Section 311.09, Florida Statutes, or an airport as defined in Section 332.004, Florida Statutes, the entity performing design and construction engineering and inspection services may not be the same entity. 18. Indemnification and Insurance: a. It is specifically agreed between the Parties executing this Agreement that it is not intended by any of the provisions of any part of this Agreement to create in the public or any member thereof, a third party beneficiary under this Agreement, or to authorize anyone not a party to this Agreement to maintain a suit for personal injuries or property damage pursuant to the terms or provisions of this Agreement. The Agency guarantees the payment of all just claims for materials, supplies, tools, or labor and other just claims against the Agency or any subcontractor, in connection with this Agreement. Additionally, the Agency shall indemnify, defend, and hold harmless the State of Florida, Department of Transportation, including the Department's officers and employees, from liabilities, damages, losses, and costs, including, but not limited to, reasonable attorney's fees, to the extent caused by the negligence, recklessness, or intentional wrongful misconduct of the Agency and persons employed or utilized by the Agency in the performance of this Agreement. This indemnification shall survive the termination of this Agreement. Additionally, the Agency agrees to include the following indemnification in all contracts with contractors/subcontractors and consultants/subconsultants who perform work in connection with this Agreement: "To the fullest extent permitted by law, the Agency's contractor/consultant shall indemnify, defend, and hold harmless the Agency and the State of Florida, Department of Transportation, including the Department's officers and employees, from liabilities, damages, losses and costs, including, but not limited to, reasonable attorney's fees, to the extent caused by the negligence, recklessness or intentional wrongful misconduct of the contractor/consultant and persons employed or utilized by the contractor/consultant in the performance of this Agreement. This indemnification shall survive the termination of this Agreement." The Agency shall provide Workers' Compensation Insurance in accordance with Florida's Workers' Compensation law for all employees. If subletting any of the work, ensure that the subcontractor(s) and subconsultant(s) have Workers' Compensation Insurance for their employees in accordance with Florida's Workers' Compensation law. If using "leased employees" or employees obtained through professional employer organizations ("PEO's"), ensure that such employees are covered by Workers' Compensation Insurance through the PEO's or other leasing entities. Ensure that any equipment rental agreements that include operators or other personnel who are employees of independent contractors, sole proprietorships, or partners are covered by insurance required under Florida's Workers' Compensation law. 70 Page 14 of 31 STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Form 725-000-01 PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION STRATEGIC DEVELOPMENT GRANT AGREEMENT OGC 03125 c. If the Agency elects to self -perform the Project, then the Agency may self -insure. If the Agency elects to hire a contractor or consultant to perform the Project, then the Agency shall carry, or cause its contractor or consultant to carry, Commercial General Liability insurance providing continuous coverage for all work or operations performed under this Agreement. Such insurance shall be no more restrictive than that provided by the latest occurrence form edition of the standard Commercial General Liability Coverage Form (ISO Form CG 00 01) as filed for use in the State of Florida. The Agency shall cause, or cause its contractor or consultant to cause, the Department to be made an Additional Insured as to such insurance. Such coverage shall be on an "occurrence" basis and shall include Products/Completed Operations coverage. The coverage afforded to the Department as an Additional Insured shall be primary as to any other available insurance and shall not be more restrictive than the coverage afforded to the Named Insured. The limits of coverage shall not be less than $1,000,000 for each occurrence and not less than a $5,000,000 annual general aggregate, inclusive of amounts provided by an umbrella or excess policy. The limits of coverage described herein shall apply fully to the work or operations performed under the Agreement, and may not be shared with or diminished by claims unrelated to the Agreement. The policy/ies and coverage described herein may be subject to a deductible and such deductibles shall be paid by the Named Insured. No policy/ies or coverage described herein may contain or be subject to a Retention or a Self -Insured Retention unless the Agency is a state agency or subdivision of the State of Florida that elects to self -perform the Project. Prior to the execution of the Agreement, and at all renewal periods which occur prior to final acceptance of the work, the Department shall be provided with an ACORD Certificate of Liability Insurance reflecting the coverage described herein. The Department shall be notified in writing within ten days of any cancellation, notice of cancellation, lapse, renewal, or proposed change to any policy or coverage described herein. The Department's approval or failure to disapprove any policy/ies, coverage, or ACORD Certificates shall not relieve or excuse any obligation to procure and maintain the insurance required herein, nor serve as a waiver of any rights or defenses the Department may have. d. When the Agreement includes the construction of a railroad grade crossing, railroad overpass or underpass structure, or any other work or operations within the limits of the railroad right- of-way, including any encroachments thereon from work or operations in the vicinity of the railroad right-of-way, the Agency shall, or cause its contractor to, in addition to the insurance coverage required above, procure and maintain Railroad Protective Liability Coverage (ISO Form CG 00 35) where the railroad is the Named Insured and where the limits are not less than $2,000,000 combined single limit for bodily injury and/or property damage per occurrence, and with an annual aggregate limit of not less than $6,000,000. The railroad shall also be added along with the Department as an Additional Insured on the policy/ies procured pursuant to the paragraph above. Prior to the execution of the Agreement, and at all renewal periods which occur prior to final acceptance of the work, both the Department and the railroad shall be provided with an ACORD Certificate of Liability Insurance reflecting the coverage described herein. The insurance described herein shall be maintained through final acceptance of the work. Both the Department and the railroad shall be notified in writing within ten days of any cancellation, notice of cancellation, renewal, or proposed change to any policy or coverage described herein. The Department's approval or failure to disapprove any policy/ies, coverage, or ACORD Certificates shall not relieve or excuse any obligation to procure and maintain the insurance required herein, nor serve as a waiver of any rights the Department may have. e. When the Agreement involves work on or in the vicinity of utility -owned property or facilities, the utility shall be added along with the Department as an Additional Insured on the Commercial General Liability policy/ies procured above. 71 Page 15 of 31 STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Form 725-000-01 PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION STRATEGIC DEVELOPMENT GRANT AGREEMENT OGC 03/25 19. Miscellaneous: a. Environmental Regulations. The Agency will be solely responsible for compliance with all applicable environmental regulations and for any liability arising from non-compliance with these regulations, and will reimburse the Department for any loss incurred in connection therewith. b. Non -Admission of Liability. In no event shall the making by the Department of any payment to the Agency constitute or be construed as a waiver by the Department of any breach of covenant or any default which may then exist on the part of the Agency and the making of such payment by the Department, while any such breach or default shall exist, shall in no way impair or prejudice any right or remedy available to the Department with respect to such breach or default. c. Severability. If any provision of this Agreement is held invalid, the remainder of this Agreement shall not be affected. In such an instance, the remainder would then continue to conform to the terms and requirements of applicable law. d. Agency not an agent of Department. The Agency and the Department agree that the Agency, its employees, contractors, subcontractors, consultants, and subconsultants are not agents of the Department as a result of this Agreement. e. Bonus or Commission. By execution of the Agreement, the Agency represents that it has not paid and, also agrees not to pay, any bonus or commission for the purpose of obtaining an approval of its application for the financing hereunder. f. Non -Contravention of State Law. Nothing in the Agreement shall require the Agency to observe or enforce compliance with any provision or perform any act or do any other thing in contravention of any applicable state law. If any of the provisions of the Agreement violate any applicable state law, the Agency will at once notify the Department in writing so that appropriate changes and modifications may be made by the Department and the Agency to the end that the Agency may proceed as soon as possible with the Project. g. Execution of Agreement. This Agreement may be executed in one or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which shall constitute the same Agreement. A facsimile or electronic transmission of this Agreement with a signature on behalf of a party will be legal and binding on such party. h. Federal Award Identification Number (FAIN). If the FAIN is not available prior to execution of the Agreement, the Department may unilaterally add the FAIN to the Agreement without approval of the Agency and without an amendment to the Agreement. If this occurs, an updated Agreement that includes the FAIN will be provided to the Agency and uploaded to the Department of Financial Services' Florida Accountability Contract Tracking System (FACTS). i. Inspector General Cooperation. The Agency agrees to comply with Section 20.055(5), Florida Statutes, and to incorporate in all subcontracts the obligation to comply with Section 20.055(5), Florida Statutes. j. Law, Forum, and Venue. This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Florida. In the event of a conflict between any portion of the contract and Florida law, the laws of Florida shall prevail. The Agency agrees to waive forum and venue and that the Department shall determine the forum and venue in which any dispute under this Agreement is decided. 72 Page 16 of 31 STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION GRANT AGREEMENT Form 725-000-01 STRATEGIC DEVELOPMENT OGC 03125 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have executed this Agrbement on the day and year written above. AGENCY Indian River County BOCC STATE OF FLORIDA, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION By: By: Name: John P. Krane, P.E. Name: _ Title: Director of Transportation Development Title: STATE OF FLORIDA, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Legal Review: 73 Page 17 of 31 STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Form 725-000-02 PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION STRATEGIC DEVELOPMENT GRANT AGREEMENT EXHIBITS OGC 03/25 EXHIBIT A Project Description and Responsibilities A. Project Description (description of Agency's project to provide context, description of project components funded via this Agreement (if not the entire project)): Operating Assistance for the continuity of the fixed route service to Fellsmere, FL via GoLine Route 10. B. Project Location (limits, city, county, map): Indian River County BOCCNero Beach, FL/Indian River C. Project Scope (allowable costs: describe project components, improvement type/service type, approximate timeline, project schedule, project size): The goal is to provide rural fixed route transit service (GoLine Route 10) between the North County Transit Hub, and the rural area being the City of Fellsmere D. Deliverable(s): Number of Trips Provided The project scope identifies the ultimate project deliverables. Deliverables for requisition, payment and invoice purposes will be the incremental progress made toward completion of project scope elements. Supporting documentation will be quantifiable, measurable, and verifiable, to allow for a determination of the amount of incremental progress that has been made, and provide evidence that the payment requested is commensurate with the accomplished incremental progress and costs incurred by the Agency. E. Unallowable Costs (including but not limited to): F. Transit Operating Grant Requirements (Transit Only): Transit Operating Grants billed as an operational subsidy will require an expenditure detail report from the Agency that matches the invoice period. The expenditure detail, along with the progress report, will be the required deliverables for Transit Operating Grants. Operating grants may be issued for a term not to exceed three years from execution. The original grant agreement will include funding for year one. Funding for years two and three will be added by amendment as long as the grantee has submitted all invoices on schedule and the project deliverables for the year have been met. 74 Page 18 of 31 STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Form 725-000-02 PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION STRATEGIC DEVELOPMENT GRANT AGREEMENT EXHIBITS OGC03125 EXHIBIT B Schedule of Financial Assistance TRANSIT OPERATING ONLY FUNDS AWARDED TO THE AGENCY PURSUANT TO THIS AGREEMENT CONSIST OF THE FOLLOWING: A. Fund Type and Fiscal Year: Financial Fund FLAIR State Object CSFA/ CSFA/CFDA Title or Funding Project $0 Category Fiscal Code CFDA $0 Contractual Services Number Type $44,809 Year Travel Number Funding Source Description Amount 407182-4-84-01 DU 088774 2026 780000 20.509 Formula Grants for Rural Areas $44,809.00 $0 LF $0 Totals $0 $44,809 $44,809 $44,809.00 Total Financial Assistance $89,618.00 B. Operations Phase - Estimate of Project Costs by Budget Category: Budget Categories Operations (Transit Only) " State Local Federal Total Salaries $0 $0 $0 $0 Fringe Benefits $0 $0 $0 $0 Contractual Services $0 $44,809 $44,809 $89,618 Travel $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Direct Costs $0 $0 $0 $0 Indirect Costs $0 $0 $0 $0 Totals $0 $44,809 $44,809 $89,618 Budget category amounts are estimates and can be shifted between items without amendment (because they are all within the Operations Phase). C. Cost Reimbursement The Agency will submit invoices for cost reimbursement on a: _ Monthly X Quarterly _ Other: basis upon the approval of the deliverables including the expenditure detail provided by the Agency. Scope Code and/or Activity30.09.01 Line Item (ALI) (Transit Only) Common Name/UZA Name Transit Only) Vero Beach/Sebastian BUDGET/COST ANALYSIS CERTIFICATION AS REQUIRED BY SECTION 216.3475, FLORIDA STATUTES: I certify that the cost for each line item budget category has been evaluated and determined to be allowable, reasonable, and necessary as required by Section 216.3475, Florida Statutes. Documentation is on file evidencing the methodology used and the conclusions reached. Marie Dorismond Department Grant Manager Name Signature Date 75 Page 19 of 31 STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Form 725-000-02 PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION STRATEGIC DEVELOPMENT GRANT AGREEMENT EXHIBITS OGC 03125 EXHIBIT D AGENCY RESOLUTION PLEASE SEE ATTACHED 76 Page 20 of 31 STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Forth 725-000-02 PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION STRATEGIC DEVELOPMENT GRANT AGREEMENT EXHIBITS OGC 03125 EXHIBIT E PROGRAM SPECIFIC TERMS AND CONDITIONS — TRANSIT (Section 5311: Formula Grants for Rural Areas) This exhibit forms an integral part of the Agreement between the Department and the Agency. The Agency, as the "subrecipient", shall comply with all applicable federal laws, regulations, and requirements, and should follow applicable federal guidance as outlined in the current FTA Master Agreement and 2 CFR Part 200, including but not limited to: 1. Conformance with Enabling Legislation. This Agreement is in conformance with Section 5311 of the Federal Transit Act of 1991, as amended (49 U.S.C. 5311) and Section 341.051(1)(a), F.S. 2. Alcohol Misuse and Prohibited Drug Use. The Agency shall establish and implement anti-drug and alcohol misuse prevention programs in accordance with the terms of 49 CFR 655, 49 U.S.C. 5331, and 49 CFR 40. 3. Adherence to Certifications and Assurances. The Agency shall ensure adherence with all federally required certifications and assurances made in its application to the Department for Section 5311 funds. 4. FTA Compliance. The Agency shall at all times comply with all applicable Federal Transit Administration ("FTA") regulations, policies, procedures and directives, including without limitation those listed directly or by reference in the Master Agreement between the Department and FTA, as they may be amended or promulgated from time to time during the term of this contract. Failure to comply shall constitute a material breach of this contract. 5. Nondiscrimination. The Agency agrees to comply with all applicable requirements imposed by or issued pursuant to 49 U.S.C. 5332, 49 CFR 21, 42 U.S.C. 2000(d) and (e), 42 U.S.C. 6102, 42 U.S.C. 12132, and 42 U.S.C. § 12132. The agency also understands that this assurance extends to its entire facility and to facilities operated in connection with the project. 6. Seat Belt Use. The Agency agrees to implement Executive Order No. 13043, "Increasing Seat Belt Use in the United States," 23 U.S.C. § 402. 7. Distracted Driving. The Agency agrees to comply with Executive Order No. 13513, "Federal Leadership on Reducing Text Messaging While Driving," 23 U.S.C. § 402 note and U.S. DOT Order 902.10, "Text Messaging While Driving and the U.S. DOT Special Provision pertaining to Distracted Driving. 8. Charter Service. The Section 5311 subrecipient agrees to comply with 49 U.S.C. 5323(d), (g) and (r) and 49 CFR 604 and any other federal Charter Service regulations, which provide that recipients and subrecipients of FTA assistance are prohibited from providing charter service using federally funded equipment or facilities if there is at least one private charter operator willing and able to provide the service, except under one of the exceptions at 49 CFR 604.9. Any charter service provided under one of the exceptions must be "incidental," i.e., it must not interfere with or detract from the provision of mass transportation. 9. School Bus Operations. Pursuant to 69 U.S.C. 5323(f) and 49 CFR 605, the Agency of FTA assistance may not engage in school bus operations exclusively for the transportation of students and school personnel in competition with private school bus operators unless qualified under specified exemptions. When operating exclusive school bus service under an allowable exemption, subrecipients may not use federally funded equipment, vehicles, or facilities. 10. Disadvantaged Business Enterprises (DBE). This grant is subject to the requirements of Title 49, Code of Federal Regulations, Part 26, Participation by Disadvantaged Business Enterprises in Department of 77 Page 21 of 31 STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Form 725-000-02 PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION STRATEGIC DEVELOPMENT GRANT AGREEMENT EXHIBITS OGC03/25 Transportation Financial Assistance Programs. The Agency must complete biannual DBE reports and submit them to the Department by May 1 and November 1 annually. 11. Buy America. The Agency agrees to comply with Buy America requirements outlined in 49 U.S.C. 53230) and 49 CFR 661, if using the funds granted under this Agreement for rolling stock purchases. The recipient also agrees to comply with the pre -award and post -delivery requirements outlined in 49 CFR 661.12. 12. Clean Air and Water Pollution Acts. The Agency agrees to comply with all applicable standards, orders or regulations issued pursuant to the Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. 7401-7671 q) and the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (33 U.S.C. §§ 1251 — 1388) as amended, if the agreement exceeds $150,000. 13. Anti -Lobbying. The Agency agrees to comply with the requirements pursuant to Byrd Anti -Lobbying Amendment, 31 U.S.C. 1352(b)(5), U.S. DOT regulations, "New Restrictions on Lobbying," 49 CFR Part 20, to the extent consistent with 31 U.S.C. § 1352, as amended and other applicable federal laws, regulations, requirements, and guidance prohibiting the use of federal assistance for any activity concerning legislation or appropriations designed to influence the U.S. Congress or a state legislature. 14. Bonding Requirements. If this Agreement is for a construction project over $250,000 the recipient must adhere to FTA's bonding requirements 2 CFR 200.326 as outlined in the Best Practices Procurement Manual. 15. Solid Wastes. Where the purchase price of the item exceeds $10,000 or the value of the quantity acquired during the preceding fiscal year exceeded $10,000, the Agency agrees to comply with all the requirement of the Solid Waste Disposal Act, as amended by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, 49 U.S.C. 6962, as amended, including but not limited to the regulatory provisions of 40 CFR 247, and Executive Order 12873, as they apply to the procurement of the items designated in Subpart B of 40 CFR 247. Sample language can be found in the Department's "Procurement Guidance for Transit Agencies." 16. Employee Protections (Davis -Bacon and Copeland Anti -Kickback). The Agency agrees to comply with the Davis -Bacon and Copeland Anti -Kickback Acts as codified at 40 U.S.C. 3141 et seq. and 18 U.S.C. 874 for any agreement exceeding $2,000. Sample language can be found in the Department's "Procurement Guidance for Transit Agencies." 17. Employee Relations (Contract Work Hours and Safety Standards). For any contract over $100,000, the Agency agrees to comply with the Contract Work Hours and Safety Standards Act, codified at 40 U.S.C. 3701 et seq. 18. Breaches and Dispute Resolution. The Agency agrees to include "Breaches and Dispute Resolution" language in all third -party agreements in compliance with 2 CFR 200 and FTA Circular 4220.1 E or subsequent revisions. 19. Transit Employee Protective Agreements. The Agency agrees to comply with the Transit Employee Protective Agreements as codified in 49 U.S.C. 5333 and 29 CFR 215. 20. Compliance with FTA Terms and Conditions. The Agency shall not perform any act, fail to perform any act, or refuse to comply with any Department requests which would cause the 5311 subrecipient to be in violation of the FTA terms and conditions. 21. Annual Safety Certification. In accordance with Section 341.061, F.S., and Rule 14-90, Florida Administrative Code, the Agency shall submit, and the Department shall have on file, an annual safety certification stating that the Agency has adopted and is complying with its adopted System Safety and Security Program Plan, and has performed annual safety inspections of all buses operated. 22. Budget/Cost Analysis. The Agency will assist the Department by providing accurate information for the Department to create a budget/cost analysis in accordance with Section 216.3475, F.S. 23. Non -Urban Area. The Agency will provide the methodology for determining the non -urban area portion of their 78 Page 22 of 31 STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Forth 725-000-02 PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION STRATEGIC DEVELOPMENT GRANT AGREEMENT EXHIBITS OGC03125 service prior to submitting the first invoice. The Agency will submit an updated methodology once per year. 24. Public Body Non -CTC Recipients. An Agency may receive 5311 funds when the Community Transportation Coordinator (CTC) in the county is a private -for-profit entity. When the Agency accepts the 5311 funding, enters into a contract/PTGA with the Department, and the contracts with the CTC to provide rural general public transportation in the same service area in which the CTC is providing non -sponsored trips for the Commission for the Transportation Disadvantaged (CTD), then the non -sponsored human service transportation grant funds will be considered as eligible match for the 5311 funds. The Agency will be responsible for ensuring that the CTC meets all the requirements associated with the federal funds. The Agency will be responsible for ensuring that all dollars provided as match were for public transportation eligible trips. The Agency must keep financial records that substantiate the eligibility for the match being provided and make that documentation available to the Department on request. 25. Transit Vehicle Inventory Management. The Agency will follow the Department's Transit Vehicle Inventory Management Procedure (725-030-025i), which outlines the requirements for continuing management control, inventory transfer and disposal actions. This procedure pertains ONLY to capital procurements of rolling stock using the FTA Section 5310, Section 5311 or Section 5339 programs as the funding source, or where the Department participates in 50% or more of the public transit vehicle's purchase price. This may include vehicles purchased under the State Transit Block Grant Program, State Transit Corridor Program, State Transit Service Development Program, or other applicable Department programs. 26. Delivery of Service Performance Requirements. The Agency shall maintain in their System Safety Program Plan (SSPP) Operational and Safety requirements. Consistent with F.S. 341.061(2)(c), the Department has the authority to conduct a review of the system. Any adverse findings and any corrective actions must be addressed. If at any time, continued operation of the system, or a portion thereof, poses an immediate danger to public safety, the system operator shall suspend affected system service until corrective action is taken. If the system operator fails to take corrective action or fails to suspend service when immediate danger to the public exists, the Department may require the affected system service to be suspended. 27. Reporting of Complaints, Grievances, and Resolutions. The Agency must have an identified complaint and grievance process on file and must report to the Department on a quarterly basis_ all reported complaints, grievances, and resolutions. 28. Agreements with contractors or subcontractors. Pursuant to Section 341.041, F.S., the above Delivery of Service Performance Requirement and Reporting of Complaints, Grievances, and Resolutions, must be included in any agreement between the Agency and such entity's contractors or subcontractors that provide paratransit services. 29. Build America, Buy America Act (BABA). For all construction contracts, the Agency agrees to comply with the Build America, Buy America Act (BABA) requirements in the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, Pub. L. No. 117-58, div. G §§ 70901-27, as implemented at 2 CFR Part 184. 30. Special EEO Provision for Construction. For all contracts that meet the definition of "federally assisted construction contract" in 41 CFR Part 60-1.3, the Agency agrees to comply with the requirements of 41 CFR 60-1.4(b). These regulations prohibit discrimination against all individuals based on their race, color, religion, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, national origin, or for inquiring about, discussing or disclosing compensation. Moreover, these regulations require that covered prime contractors and subcontractors take affirmative action to employ and advance in employment individuals without regard to race;"folor, religion, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity or national origin. 79 Page 23 of 31 STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Form 725-000-02 PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION STRATEGIC DEVELOPMENT GRANT AGREEMENT EXHIBITS OGc 03/25 31. Veterans Preference. For all construction contracts, as provided in 49 U.S.C. § 5325(k), to the extent practicable, the Agency will give a hiring preference to veterans, as defined in 5 U.S.C. § 2108. 32. Project Management Plan. For all major capital projects, the Agency agrees to develop a project management plan that details their strategies to control the Project scope, budget, schedule and quality, in compliance with 49 CFR 633. 33. Seismic Safety. For construction contracts of new or existing buildings, the agency agrees to comply with the Earthquake Hazards Reduction Act of 1977, as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 7701, et seq., and U.S. DOT regulations, "Seismic Safety," 49 CFR Part 41, specifically, 49 C.F.R. § 41.117. 34. Construction Plans and Specifications. For all construction contracts, the Agency agrees to comply with all applicable statutes, regulations, and requirements, and follow FTA guidance in the development and implementation of construction plans and specifications, including drafting, review, and approval, for the Award. 35. Review of Technical Plans and Specifications. For all construction contracts, the agency agrees to permit FTA and/or the State to review, as deemed necessary by FTA and/or the State, the technical plans and specifications. 36. Engineering Supervision at Construction Sites. For all construction contracts, the Agency agrees to provide and maintain competent and adequate engineering supervision at the construction site to ensure that the completed work conforms to the plans and specifications and that the intent of the scope of the Project is carried out. -- End of Exhibit E -- 80 Page 24 of 31 STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Form 725-000-02 PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION STRATEGIC DEVELOPMENT GRANT AGREEMENT EXHIBITS OGC 03125 Exhibit E1 PROGRAM SPECIFIC TERMS AND CONDITIONS (Prohibition on Discrimination Based on Health Care Choices) This exhibit forms an integral part of the Agreement between the Department and the Agency. 1. Statutory Reference. Section 339.08, F.S. and Section 381.00316, F.S. Statutory Compliance. Pursuant to Section 339.08, F.S., the Department may not expend state funds to support a project or program of certain entities if the entity is found to be in violation of Section 381.00316, F.S. The Department shall withhold state funds until the entity is found to be in compliance with Section 381.00316, F.S. This shall apply to any of the following entities: a. A public transit provider as defined in s. 341.031 (1), F.S.; b. An authority created pursuant to chapter 343, F.S., chapter 348, F.S., or chapter 349, F.S.; c. A public -use airport as defined in s. 332.004, F.S.; or d. A port listed in s. 311.09(1), F.S. - End of Exhibit E1 - 81 Page 25 of 31 STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Fonn 725-000-02 PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION STRATEGIC DEVELOPMENT GRANT AGREEMENT EXHIBITS OGC 03125 Exhibit E2 PROGRAM SPECIFIC TERMS AND CONDITIONS - TRANSIT (Exterior Vehicle Wrap, Tinting, Paint, Marketing, and Advertising) This exhibit forms an integral part of the Agreement between the Department and the Agency. 1. Statutory Reference. Section 341.051(8), F.S. and Section 316.2954, F.S. 2. Statutory Compliance. In accordance with Section 341.051(8), F.S., as a condition of receiving funds from the Department, a public transit provider may not expend Department funds for marketing or advertising activities, including any wrap, tinting, paint, or other medium displayed, attached, or affixed on a motor vehicle owned, leased, or operated by the public transit provider. Such vehicles on which department funds are expended are limited to exterior vehicle wrap, tinting, paint, marketing, and advertising displaying: a. a brand or logo of the public transit provider, b. the official seal of the jurisdictional governmental entity, or c. a state agency public service announcement. 3. Window Tinting Requirements. Any new wrap, tinting, paint, medium or advertisement on the passenger windows of a vehicle used by a public transit provider may not be darker than the legally allowed tinting requirements provided in Section 316.2954, F.S. - End of Exhibit E2 - 82 Page 26 of 31 STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Form 725-000-02 PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION STRATEGIC DEVELOPMENT GRANT AGREEMENT EXHIBITS OGC03125 EXHIBIT F Contract Payment Requirements Florida Department of Financial Services, Reference Guide for State Expenditures Cost Reimbursement Contracts Invoices for cost reimbursement contracts must be supported by an itemized listing of expenditures by category (salary, travel, expenses, etc.). Supporting documentation shall be submitted for each amount for which reimbursement is being claimed indicating that the item has been paid. Documentation for each amount for which reimbursement is being claimed must indicate that the item has been paid. Check numbers may be provided in lieu of copies of actual checks. Each piece of documentation should clearly reflect the dates of service. Only expenditures for categories in the approved agreement budget may be reimbursed. These expenditures must be allowable (pursuant to law) and directly related to the services being provided. Listed below are types and examples of supporting documentation for cost reimbursement agreements: (1) Salaries: A payroll register or similar documentation should be submitted. The payroll register should show gross salary charges, fringe benefits, other deductions and net pay. If an individual for whom reimbursement is being claimed is paid by the hour, a document reflecting the hours worked times the rate of pay will be acceptable. (2) Fringe Benefits: Fringe Benefits should be supported by invoices showing the amount paid on behalf of the employee (e.g., insurance premiums paid). If the contract specifically states that fringe benefits will be based on a specified percentage rather than the actual cost of fringe benefits, then the calculation for the fringe benefits amount must be shown. Exception: Governmental entities are not required to provide check numbers or copies of checks for fringe benefits. (3) Travel: Reimbursement for travel must be in accordance with Section 112.061, Florida Statutes, which includes submission of the claim on the approved State travel voucher or electronic means. (4) Other direct costs: Reimbursement will be made based on paid invoices/receipts. If nonexpendable property is purchased using State funds, the contract should include a provision for the transfer of the property to the State when services are terminated. Documentation must be provided to show compliance with Department of Management Services Rule 60A-1.017, Florida Administrative Code, regarding the requirements for contracts which include services and that provide for the contractor to purchase tangible personal property as defined in Section 273.02, Florida Statutes, for subsequent transfer to the State. (5) In-house charges: Charges which may be of an internal nature (e.g., postage, copies, etc.) may be reimbursed on a usage log which shows the units times the rate being charged. The rates must be reasonable. (6) Indirect costs: If the contract specifies that indirect costs will be paid based on a specified rate, then the calculation should be shown. Contracts between state agencies, and/or contracts between universities may submit alternative documentation to substantiate the reimbursement request that may be in the form of FLAIR reports or other detailed reports. The Florida Department of Financial Services, online Reference Guide for State Expenditures can be found at this web address: https://mvfloridacfo.com/docs-sf/accounting-and-auditing- libraries/manuals/agencies/reference-guide-for-state-expenditures.pdf?sfvrsn=b4cc3337 6 83 Page 27 of 31 STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Forth 725-000-02 PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION STRATEGIC DEVELOPMENT GRANT AGREEMENT EXHIBITS OGC 03/25 EXHIBIT H AUDIT REQUIREMENTS FOR AWARDS OF FEDERAL FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE FEDERAL RESOURCES AWARDED PURSUANT TO THIS AGREEMENT ARE AS FOLLOWS: CFDA No.: 20.509 CFDA Title: Formula Grants for Rural Areas *Award Amount: $44,809 Awarding Agency: Florida Department of Transportation Indirect Cost Rate: **Award is for R&D: No *The federal award amount may change with amendments **Research and Development as defined at 2 CFR §200.87 FEDERAL RESOURCES AWARDED PURSUANT TO THIS AGREEMENT ARE SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING AUDIT REQUIREMENTS: 2 CFR Part 200 — Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles & Audit Requirements for Federal Awards www.ecfr.gov FEDERAL RESOURCES AWARDED PURSUANT TO THIS AGREEMENT MAY ALSO BE SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING: Title 23 — Highways, United States Code http://uscode.house.gov/browse.xhtmI Title 49 — Transportation, United States Code http://uscode. house.gov/browse.xhtmI Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (IIJA) (Public Law 117-58) https://www.congress.gov/117/bills/hr3684/BI LLS-117hr3684enr.pdf Federal Highway Administration — Florida Division www.fhwa.dot.gov/fldiv Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA) Sub -award Reporting System (FSRS) www.fsrs.gov 84 Page 28 of 31 STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION GRANT AGREEMENT UEI Confirmation 85 Page 29 of 31 Last updated by Kristin Daniels on Dec 23, 2024 at 11:44 AM _I!I_SAM.00V' INDIAN RIVER, COUNTY OF Unique Entity ID FB3SLJJZ38K9 Registration Status Active Registration Physical Address 1801 27TH ST Vero Beach, Florida 32960.3388 United States CAGE/NCAGE 496V6 Expiration Date Dec 23, 2025 Mailing Address 1801 27TH Street Vero Beach, Florida 32960-3388 United States 1ND14NRlYER, COUNTY OF Purpose of Registration Federal Assistance Awards Only Registration Dates Activation Date Submission Date Initial Registration Date Dec 24, 2024 Dec 23, 2024 Jan 6, 2006 Entity Dates Entity Start Date Fiscal Year End Close Date Jan 1, 1925 Sep 30 Immediate Owner CAGE Legal Business Name (blank) (blank) Highest Level Owner CAGE Legal Business Name (blank) (blank) Executive Compensation Registrants in the System for Award Management (SAM) respond to the Executive Compensation questions in accordance with Section 6202 of P.L. 110-252, amending the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (P.L. 109-282). This information is not displayed in SAM. It is sent to USAspending.gov for display in association with an eligible award. Maintaining an active registration in SAM demonstrates the registrant responded to the questions. Proceedings Questions Registrants in the System for Award Management (SAM.gov) respond to proceedings questions in accordance with FAR 52.209-7, FAR 52.209-9, or 2. C.F.R. 200 Appendix XII. Their responses are displayed in the responsibility/qualification section of SAM.gov. Maintaining an active registration in SAM.gov demonstrates the registrant responded to the proceedings questions. Active Exclusions Records? No I authorize my entity's non -sensitive information to be displayed in SAM public search results: Yes Business Types Entity Structure Entity Type Organization Factors U.S. Government Entity US Local Government (blank) Profit Structure (blank) Jun 24, 2025 01:18:03 PM GMT v v https:llsam.govlentitylFB3SLIJZ38K91coreData?status=null Page /Ppge 30 of 3 Last updated by Kristin Daniels on Dec 23, 1024 at 11:44 AM INDIAN RIVER, COUNTY OF Socio-Economic Types Check the registrant's Reps & Certs, if present, under FAR 52.212-3 or FAR 52.219-1 to determine if the entity is an SBA-certified HUBZone small business concern. Additional small business information may be found in the SBA's Dynamic Small Business Search if the entity completed the SBA supplemental pages during registration. Government Types U.S. Local Government County ffw— .=„ '"1$`✓. i+i xi�'wt .. _ �: er "� i. „ ..:. .✓„ c.w'v"{'� %i' .. v., f: � ,, m .W��Y x , n���"%A�/� _,,.. . Accepts Credit Card Payments Debt Subject To Offset Yes No EFT Indicator CAGE Code 0000 496V6 Electronic Business P 1801 27TH Street Kristin Daniels, Director, Office of Management Vero Beach, Florida 32960 & Budget United States KRISTIN DANIELS, Director, Office of Management 1801 27TH Street & Budget Vero Beach, Florida 32960 United States Government Business 1801 27TH Street Kristin Daniels, Director, Office of Management Vero Beach, Florida 32960 & Budget United States KRISTIN DANIELS, Director, Office of Management 1801 27TH Street & Budget Vero Beach, Florida 32960 United States Past Performance 4055 41 ST Avenue Aimee Markford, CONTROLLER Vero Beach, Florida 32960 United States Kathleen Minix, SUPERVISOR 405541 ST Avenue Vero Beach, Florida 32960 United States NAICS Codes Primary NAICS Codes NAICS Title This entity does not appear in the disaster response registry. Jun 24, 2025 01:28:03 PM GMT 87 https:llsam.govlentitylFB3SL/JZ38K91coreData?status=null page 2Ppge 31 of 3 Indian River County, Florida *xioA # MEMORANDUM Indian River County Administration Complex 1801 27th Street Vero Beach, Florida 32960 indianriver.gov File ID: 25-1066 Type: Consent Staff Report Meeting Date: 11/18/2025 TO: Board of County Commissioners THROUGH: John Titkanich, Jr., County Administrator FROM: Jennifer W Shuler, County Attorney DATE: October 29, 2025 SUBJECT: Travel Authorization for the County Attorney for Fiscal Year 2025/2026 BACKGROUND Pursuant to the County Attorney's Employment Agreement, Section 6, the "County shall pay for all Attorney's continuing legal education, as necessary to maintain membership in The Florida Bar. The term "continuing legal education" includes program fees, travel, lodging, and per diem expenses. County shall pay Attorney's Florida Bar dues, relevant Florida Bar section fees, Florida Association of County Attorneys dues, and Indian River County Bar Association dues." The County Attorney occasionally travels out -of -county to attend continuing education seminars that are relevant to her job duties. Additionally, the County Attorney may need to travel out -of -county for the following purposes: 1. To attend legislative or policy conferences, or meetings scheduled by the Florida Association of County Attorneys, or the City, County, Local Government Florida bar section. 2. To meet with federal or state legislators and/or government agencies. 3. To represent the County in legal matters for County cases, projects, grants, or legislative matters. BUDGETARY IMPACT Funding, in the amount of $3,600, was budgeted in the Fiscal Year 2026 budget in the General Fund/County Attorney/All Travel account, number 00110214-034020, along with $3,625 in the General Fund/County Attorney/Registration Fees account, number 00110214-035430, to cover the County Attorney, Deputy County Attorney, Assistant County Attorney and other applicable staff's arrangements. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Approve the County Attorney's travel needs for Fiscal Year 2025/2026 Indian River County, Florida Page 1 of 1 Printed on 11/13/2025 powergpy legistarT (,✓' Indian River County Indian River County, Florida Administration Complex 1801 27th Street Vero Beach, Florida 32960 * ' * indianriver.gov MEMORANDUM File ID: 25-1070 Type: Consent Staff Report Meeting Date: 11/18/2025 TO: Board of County Commissioners THROUGH: John A. Titkanich, Jr., County Administrator THROUGH: Jennifer W. Shuler, County Attorney FROM: Christopher A. Hicks, Assistant County Attorney DATE: October 28, 2025 SUBJECT: Partial Release of Drainage Easement - 13620 Indian River Drive Property Owner - Kathy Burns BACKGROUND The Department of Public Works recommends a partial release of the existing easement located at 13620 North Indian River Drive, Sebastian, Florida 32958, owned by Katherine Burns. The purpose of this partial release is to accommodate the existing garage, concrete patio, and pool, which currently encroach upon the easement. When Ms. Burns purchased the property she found that a previous owner constructed the garage, pool, and patio on top of an existing drainage easement containing a pipe that was failing. The County worked with Ms. Burns to replace the pipe in a location that would bring her existing structures into compliance, while maintaining the required stormwater drainage. Under Project IRC -2423, the newly installed drainage pipe was relocated away from the residence and remains within the easement. The Indian River County Public Works Department has no further need to retain the portion of the easement located beneath the existing garage, concrete patio, and pool. ANALYSIS The request has been reviewed by the IRC Engineering Division and the IRC Surveyor. It is staff's position that the requested easement release would have no adverse effect to subject property or on other properties in the vicinity. The new drainage system remains within the easement and is not affected by the partial release and remains maintainable by the County. BUDGETARY IMPACT The cost of recording is approximately $37.00. The cost will be funded from the Optional Sales Tax Fund/Road & Bridge Construction Program/Indian River Drive Culvert Replacement account, number 31521441-066510- 25003. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Board, through adoption of the proposed resolution and Partial Release of Easement, Indian River County, Florida Page 1 of 2 Printed on 11/13/2025 powerego( t_egistarTM approve the subject release of the County -dedicated easement at 13620 Indian Rier Drive. Indian River County, Florida Page 2 of 2 Printed on 11/13/2025 powero Legistar' , part of Tax Parcel I.D. 30382500000005000010.0 Prepared by and return to: Office of County Attorney INDIAN RIVER COUNTY 1801 27m Street Vero Beach, FL 32960 772-226-1452 PARTIAL RELEASE OF EASEMENT WHEREAS, Indian River County was granted a Grant of Easement for drainage by Kenneth L. Earnheart and Brenda E. Earnheart, his wife, and James Robert Jordan and Doris May Jordan, his wife, said Grant of Easement being recorded in O.R. Book 0820, Page 2267 of the Public Records of Indian River County, Florida; and WHEREAS, the new owner, Katherine Burns, purchased the home and learned that some previous owner installed a garage, concrete patio, and pool over the easement and the pipe was failing. The drainage pipe was relocated away from the residence and remains within the easement. The Indian River County Public Works Department has no further need to retain the portion of the easement located beneath the existing garage, concrete patio, and pool. NOW, THEREFORE, THIS GRANT OF EASEMENT is executed on behalf of the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, whose mailing address is 1801 27th Street, Vero Beach, Florida 32960, Grantor, to KATHERINE BURNS 13620 North Indian River Drive, Sebastian, FL 32958 her successors in interest, heirs and assigns, Grantee, as follows: Indian River County does hereby partially release all right, title, and interest that it may have in the following described Grant of Easement: SEE SKETCH AND LEGAL DESCRIPTION ATTACHED HERETO AS EXHIBIT "A" [SIGNATURES TO FOLLOW ON NEXT PAGE] 91 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Grantor has caused these presents to be executed in its name by its Chairman this day of , 2025. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA Joseph E. Flescher, Chairman ATTEST: Ryan L. Bulter, Clerk of Circuit Court and Comptroller Deputy Clerk 92 RESOLUTION NO. 2025 - A RESOLUTION OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, RELEASING AN EASEMENT (OR PORTION THEREOF) ON 13620 N INDIAN RIVER DRIVE WHEREAS, Indian River County has an interest in a drainage easement located on 13620 N Indian River Drive. (SELY 100 FT OF PART OF LOTS 5 & 7; LYING E OF OLD D/H AS IN D BK 42 PP 479; LYING E OF US HWY NO 1; AS IN D BK 83 PP 131, ALSO DESC AS IN OR BK 3039 PP 219); and WHEREAS, Katherine H. Burns, the owner of 13620 N Indian River Drive, has made application to Indian River County requesting that the County release the easement, or portion thereof; and WHEREAS, the retention of the easement, or portion thereof, as described below, serves no public purpose; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida that: INDIAN RIVER COUNTY DOES HEREBY RELEASE and abandon all right, title, and interest that it may have in the following described easement(s): SEE SKETCH AND LEGAL DESCRIPTION A TTA CHED HERETO AS EXHIBIT "A" This release of easement is executed by Indian River County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, whose mailing address is 1801 27th Street, Vero Beach, Florida 32960. THIS RESOLUTION was moved for adoption by Commissioner , seconded by Commissioner , and adopted on the day of , 2025, by the following vote: Chairman Joseph E. Flescher Vice Chairman Deryl Loar Commissioner Joe Earman Commissioner Susan Adams Commissioner Laura Moss The Chairman declared the resolution duly passed and adopted this day of , 2025 93 RESOLUTION NO. 2025 - BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA Joseph E. Flescher, Chairman ATTEST: Ryan L. Butler, Clerk of Court and Comptroller Deputy Clerk APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: Christopher A. Hicks Assistant County Attorney 94 LL fV p O w N w LL ¢ O_ LL w LLO }ap r) w a N =� o Wx ❑ w Vic) �❑ co w 0LL ❑ ¢ ❑ ¢ O O -i W ¢ UO zm=ULL w U) ?x0Om>- a 0<(D zxw AZO LL w >_ a Q 0= 'p O W 0❑ X LL c~n W 2 z ¢¢> (� ¢ Z z w a� -W >inn^°F WF-Foz�❑❑ -i IL W OJ �mwLLI a0H O oc ❑ z U❑ N O W W H N F¢¢¢ a F w 0 2¢ F O w U a z❑ can0 W>xa�w~=wQ W MLLLZ c7Z OpY rnOf Z 0z NXLL v � LU W ¢ ❑— W W¢ W 0 LL W 2 F O � } �� p H n w> �w QZFt Ft?a0Fp00.0U)0 W 2 OOf 02 w W< ��w o Q m �> ��zQoNOLriwO�Zw W?p ❑O LL a�0 2LL0¢ui 5aa Q LU w Q a ¢ NLL W LJ 20 a W W F Z�OW az❑ u V 0 rLL}Q JwZ�0LL0ryF0=�W�p w� UZW �a�� ❑�� �zZ ZZ W Z -Om W �U��oFxOv¢i H� W ❑ W a0Oa WLL O z CC F- op zQ2C70cc Q,ww W QWFQ 0 C7� Ca�wO w�aF a V O O aU) >}�UcnULLpxr)-LL c)Z W 0- F- ❑ ^¢ F- W LL w� LLOLL<J�pZM¢�-LL�O�_ _V W U_ J F- ❑=QF - Y o �� wOLLwQac~gLO<0w- m � F -j zOUI ¢Fafa n ^ zw W (OF-WOZ❑O W Z?ZZfw - �� 2¢� Um W DU 0m(DwLLLi�aW ¢0xwwx (� O U OU wFQ0 zm }wX-OtnUz�a�F-W } ~O YOp cn0of V a V) w �d Of W � W W LaLHd00LL}� �¢ � W Q �Fzo r�i O 00 aLL w'woww}LnW F W OaF - -1 LdLL www F W rnN m �EL F W W OOofawaw W FZF¢ aO F -2F- FU)wa - LL C C70 SxL¢wOwmUZNZww0 Ocn 2m- >QO w ULJ Ln N zz aj F F 2 w O❑ W¢ O- O F W Q z❑ F a Q >- a' 2 V p Z E ac4 00p W Q W � p W a<Fx--CNi vW L}LLo0 Hc(n❑W Q V 5 ww z z w O =W ZOU� ❑Q�QZF-2Zz a �❑-1 W �a0 (7 Ln F- Cr F¢ 2Z��Z�(nM V7¢aU00J a W ❑❑ UW(nF- =)'Fn N a F Jz wF-(7^LLF-w2 F-¢ UZz a 0' - LL C oo �U) cyi �0�vwiW�FCw70 01 ¢�wa W W zv� FFW? LU O MM W i ¢oa ❑ N of -W 2'U> VJ �- ^ Z M 0_Y maLLF-wNF-O W ao �¢� w0 W J �Qa < "O -�'m C =0 0Of ww❑wz}ofLon=Oo) g =c2)U)co L_`a_U)0- v }0�_j L- rn0 Jzofz<wwww<=FFO � ZZ>LA L z� aaawZLL UwOWOcWN i) v 3oCa0 0cr wOmU¢0L_^nLaiFh-OF Wrn >, L '� V o a 0 SOU WFWpzP-1 IL Ln � m o �..N a' O Ln Z F p J M W F- W J O 2 U O a) IC ry VI C OQuj pr%�Oi/i� FwxYa0Xw c N 3 0 a)@ o H- C-) C) FUO OW m N a °-L9 > > C C NLLO m�>�WOO�00aOww c°O a o m La 0W vi ZOO ❑�a'�p20aQ❑W�wx ?a) w c �� m� O�> z LL Z o 7 D Z prn gU< <(!) W U` FNW W NCO mj� � QLL Z6N CC d JmmLO QmZ7O�F� WOZLL N (DLL�Z °> 30 aNi N C �a 4> j 0.L ❑Z 0y LLOS❑ W -Z EL 0cc ON OW W U` cL N �U >'c.N Z Cl)¢ W U OQF Q cn❑wo ❑LLUaw m o° d - m m� + Q- U❑cn ofrnzw0O¢J❑onra0zUm W �LL r 0m ° 3 t } Q❑ Z O O F- CO U LO W O U m p N L °c p c° E o 41 Z ro w JNA 4.1 0co�'No� W I-Fw--Z< Q -Z O aC L° 3 2 a) m W ❑� Um0 wc:�ax��F F-¢ w O 3U C: za N2 W �. afF-0<of0 co a � o m L � O Ua J } r)0m < z W apui¢LL O Z a).>_ Y o° N> a E awU_ af�7Uaw20z W W waZUw g asa N ° ° o� m 3c � O ❑NOF- F-davZXz❑ZF--❑U �0F W i d ca c N a) o 2 oM� 41 QSQ W vQYwOF-�20UOwFa'O w y c -O o m �� �'� o Z (nLLLL 0�OxzNmFOZ O'aN N m a)N fa O C p° L N C V pOw LLOFUwwaJxx�wrNi> w C: > E E z z Z 0 j Y O m z z z Q W a F F 2 Q W a 0� o y La N� r o a r LL U)M Z-FLL<<Lnzp=aof 0 Qa)N c o c m -0 m o Nva Z LLF-(' m(� F Oww m0 N w w _ ° o m o m o c° to o Oof Z0- W❑�aariiOOH3�zZoW ° am m >.Q o> m O C o❑ F o wam �Oppa�U¢d� W F- W Yp as U - Z COCLrjc° a° (D F- �0w ¢U w-OLLNwc"ww❑O� C7 a� d ° (1) a) n o o a) m _-_2 m LL?twJmo dZU Oa�aF W �O W LL v W }Q CO F- z Z m a w O o L @= -° p ori awQ ZQOOw��� V vC��N❑w z eco N cw '5 y C: -C mnw O a �¢ O m a Z 0 OLL W LL U F Z z F Z w z 0 LL Q m° N O a `o a� L v� 2 c o m z o o ZO❑_ lY 7,N O FZO^ _cLN a �L o E wNLn C - W Ja WLLocnom7 W0U0�a�wr° O Y mOL N m a m e In a�a 3 p o> mar) m0¢¢Na�U¢z❑w<0 � U cn oZ LL cn m Cmt �j=s C N a) a) N L O O L N 1] N p L L 'n Z FFA F co FF m vL a N N O4N CN04 w �y LLo � N � Ww Z � ° ° a Z COS W W ocW (n 0 v Vl W >- w tA a CC 5 W Q W W Z W W d Q W Q Q Lt. V 0 J W W O= W w Q Z O HZ 2 Doo »Zx3 Q Z�CC �� •h, Wa01 w 0v ��0 O Q00 .Lj1' till � p n u u u u u W V O Z rO O :, a w ,, N r *�O iD. kk I w O z I > ui LLLf Q Ne m Ex d). w o �' o vi vOi X o oil s, az so a •�+ ° �z�I.o z w ao i° m z a Y o} Ln t/I w co A. r��'I,mE& y i1b !d' I Iv�w'.� ° z ►a J OV Q ZO Z o �s�s �Oya wQJw_j O ai w O O y0 - ! iF W=Q m W VI H co 0 00 ulli::iz0aaaa J m 0 v W a: (� ci �JU m o6W�r`a =Zoe^ V co C9W wLLJZ��aaNL 3cd a0 W i�o0) F< LLI ��oN y< W mZ00 I WV, •'•` f0 W<Qg NIA W Le Fri I I I y O C O z zc z i/i Y N N m Wt0 C I-, o d' � I'� ! "b d6 O p 11P!I�r� o CC t C& ; >Wi -& o 9 - my °ys z ` o o 0 oE Cc cr Z tiw L C N{�1 mru `� C K 'Ilei w Z W 3W Z I�1� •C Gz U09 01 0 CZ <• EN Q< G h�H�W�, toz O n - V OW Zo_ZN6 41 yp�y t}'o S.,, O OC `�a ZNW O YoraJ V �.y ^ rLIS O � m� O� 11 � �L yt- in oFv1 o z m R (n 06 ��pQO• P� �� ^ oruK ru jco, o g ' c IA a •L- z a t Z ON �nln�rrJ1411, I o +ti\ h` tg US 1 41 r1 2 i \ n27 Ln �.. N CL � YW �. z o9 .. •, 1 '•\t L7. fN0 m�eG� b v 2 5y�, w �. T4• OD o rczZga tic`p�� LU Ak p4p sel c ?�♦R \ \'" o ti h 36Y8! � ��♦\ \ wO i�w II II II y I � ♦\\ ryo \ ZW �� 4 [� W W O W `yN z j will .n � U cit <e ypyp 4Le uy 9\♦ 3 gg t $$ It tS Na gig co bJ \ 3 . c.J 'Ilia document was prepared by 9 J 2 8 (PLAN2) LEGAL (WGC/ nhm) and should be returned to 583713 the County Attorney's Office, 1840 25th St., Vuo Beach, Florida 32960 GRANT OF EASEMENT THIS GRAN OF EASEMENT, made and executed this j� ay of 1988, by KENNETH L. EARNHEART and 11 �j BREADA E. , is if., and JAMES ROBERT JORDAN and �J- DORIS MAY JORDAN, his wife, whose mailing address is 13622 Indian River Drive, Sebastian, Florida 32958, hereinafter called GRANTORS, to INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, whose mailing address is 1840 25th Street, Vero Beach, Florida 32960, hereinafter called GRANTEE. (Whenever used herein, the terms GRANTORS and GRANTEE include all the parties to this instrument and their heirs, legal representatives, successors, and assigns.) WITNESSETH: That Grantors, for and in consideration of the following: 1. Indian River County's agreement to pay the sum of four thousand two hundred dollars (;4,200.00) as the fair market value of repair and DOG ST.. AtAT ► -*;5 structure of a carport and ut i If ty TOKCMXaQaAOdrt structure currently situated over this 11CMR Asn TOK wk co , stormwater and drainage easement; RiveCou"I y� 2. Indian River County's agreement to,Aw that the County will replace, at the County's expense in the event that any damages to the well are caused by the construction of the drainage structure being replaced; and 3. Indian River County's agreement to remove the existing structure and debris and to restore and sod the construction area upon completion of the culvert replacement; and with the understanding that all outside contracting for the replacement of the structure and temporary relocation of the water pump will be the responsibility of the Grantors, and hereby acknowledging the receipt of the $4,200.00 fair market value as stated above in paragraph 1, the Grantors by these presents do grant, bargain, sell, alienate, remise, release, convey, and confirm unto the Grantee, a perpetual 20 -foot easement for DRAINAGE along, over, across and beneath the following described land, situate in Indian River County, Florida, to -wit: See Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof. AND Grantors hereby covenant with said Grantee that they are lawfully seized of said servient land, and that they have good right and lawful authority to convey the easement established hereby and will defend the same against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Grantors have hereunto set their hands and seals the day and year first above written. Signed, sealed and delivered In the presence of: wi tness i t��— Kennet am re 0. R. 0820 PG 2267 98 Witness WT -w tness Wiitn''ess Witness iso Wiit/n�esss INT-tness STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF INDIAN RIVER 7 C_4 e�— Brrenaa E. Earnheart ames KOrb 71 Jordan BEFORE ME, the undersigned authority, this day appeared KENNETH L. EARNHEART, well known to me to be the person described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and he acknowledged before me that he executed , the same for the purposes therein expressed. Notary Pub. T� r My Commission !Expires: ]xrpti res : NOTARY PUBLIC. STATE OF FLO^IDA A S ! LARGE,,'' - 15" QS MY COMM MON ERP IES EIAY IS. 192 BOROEDTHRU AGENT'S NOTARY BROKERAGE STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF INDIAN RIVER BEFORE ME, the undersigned authority, this day appeared BRENDA E. EARNHEART, well known to me to be the person described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and she acknowledged before me that she executed the same for the purposes therein expressed. ��otary u6'fic may' ..7 My Commission pExpires: N. NOTARY PUBLIl;STATE OFFLO^IOMATLAROE, MY COMMISS'OR EXP -ES I':Y 'S,'I992 .. - BOHDEO THRU AGENT'S NOTARriBROKERAGE �.`v 71 F 748 %' Z � �ZI Wd hZ kVf 68 0. R. 0820 PG 2268 99 STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF INDIAN RIVER BEFORE ME, the undersigned authority, this day appeared JAMES ROBERT JORDAN, well known to me to be the person described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and he acknowledged before me that he executed the same for the purposes therein expressed. 'Notary PubS' My Commission Expires: NOTARY PUBLIC: STETtO%{ibeJBM�fl1�V MY C9MM' S-0^ EXP tisi•: t y,E - ' 4 ••.7E� �0 XE9 TXSD /6 R" M'�: ■i IIlIi[ >tif T : •. STATE OF FLORIDA a�*•••"'�• COUNTY OF INDIAN R I VER BEFORE ME, the undersigned authority, this day appeared DORIS MAY JORDAN, well known to me to be the person . described in and who executed the foregoing instrument_ artd-iI she acknowledged before me that she executed the sa ekjoit `,•'•;,` the purposes therein expressed. �,� ''•�'^:�` tel. 'M . My Commission �`7nExpires: S -1.J � r:C-i.CY PCBLtC, S•"t `7 tiY ette?'S70, E[P ,.r.. CE) TXni: AB PT' APPROVEO AS TO FORMS AND LEGAL SUFFICIENCY BY WILLIA'A G. COLLINS 11 ASST. COUNTY ATTORNEY 3 0. R. 0820 PG 22" too DRAINAGE EASEMENT The South 20 feel, measured perpendicular to the South line of the South /00 feet of that part of the following described frmf lying between Old U S. rt I Nighwoy (now known as Indian River Drive / and the Indian River. Commence at an iron pipe on the north edge of the paving of the road leading from State Road Number Four to the Town of Roseland -and on the centerline of the Old Dixie Highway and run South 20° 08' East along the center/ins of Old Dixie Highway a distance of 106863 feet for a Poly OF 8ESINN/NC. rhea run North 591, 09' East to the shore of hie Indian River,' then run Southeoslerly on a straight line along the shore of the Indian River a distance of 200 feet. Then run South 59° 09' West to the center of Old Dixie Highway; Then run North on the centerline of Old Dixie Highwoy to the, POJN r OF BEGINNING, sold properly being M (Government) Lots and T, Section 25, Township 30 South, Range 36 East, in Indian River County, Florida. �r,ase*�n� rAw O.R. 0820 P6 2270 101 Indian River County, Florida *•zoA>x MEMORANDUM File ID: 25-1074 Type: Consent Staff Report TO: Board of County Commissioners THROUGH: John A. Titkanich, Jr., County Administrator Kylie Yanchula, Natural Resources Director FROM: Quintin Bergman, Coastal Resource Manager DATE: October 30, 2025 9, E-' Indian River County Administration Complex 1801 27th Street Vero Beach, Florida 32960 indianriver.gov Meeting Date: 11/18/2025 SUBJECT: Change Order 1 - Work Order No. 2018029-13 - APTIM, Sector 5 Hurricanes Ian and Nicole Dune Restoration Pre -Construction and Engineering Services BACKGROUND On April 3, 2018, the Board of County Commissioners (BCC) approved a contract (RFQ#2018029) with Aptim Environmental & Infrastructure, LLC. (APTIM) for professional coastal engineering and biological support services related to the management and restoration of the Sector 5 (City of Vero Beach) beach project area. The Sector 5 project area is a 3.1 mile critically eroded section of engineered shoreline that extends just north of Tracking Station Beach Park and ends just south of the Riomar Beach Access. The Sector 5 Project Area suffered significant storm related losses to the beach and dune system from the impacts of Hurricanes Ian and Nicole during the 2022 hurricane season. These storm -related impacts, combined with prescribed maintenance activities to address background erosion, has created the need for a Sector 5 Beach and Dune Restoration project. On May 20, 2025 the BCC approved Work Order No. 2018029-13 Sector 5 Hurricanes Ian and Nicole Dune Restoration Pre -Construction and Engineering Services, which includes Task 5: additional late -season sea turtle monitoring to prepare the project area for construction activities beginning in November. An increase in late - season sea turtle monitoring services from APTIM is needed due to the higher than average sea turtle nesting activity this season. Change Order No. 1 to Work Order No. 2018029-13 in the amount of $53,374.46 is for increased services associated with the required sea turtle monitoring. ANALYSIS Indian River County beaches have received more green sea turtle nests than expected surpassing the previous 2023 nesting record of 4,105 nests. As of October 30, 2025 a total of 4,636 green sea turtle nests have been recorded. County beaches have received a total of 11,417 nests across all three turtle species this season. The increase in nesting density in Sector 5 necessitates additional services to maintain permit compliance. BUDGETARY IMPACT Local funding for beach restoration is provided by a portion of Tourist Tax. Funds in the amount of $11,742.38 Indian River County, Florida Page 1 of 2 Printed on 11/13/2025 powe{qft t_egistarT" are budgeted and available in the Fiscal Year 2025/2026 budget in the Coastal Engineering Fund/Hurricane Ian Sector 5 account, number 12814472-066510-22601, along with $41,632.08 in the Coastal Engineering Fund/Hurricane Nicole Sector 5 account, number 12814472-066510-23007. PREVIOUS BOARD ACTIONS Recommended Selection of Consultant for RFQ 2018029 - Engineering and Biological Support Services for Sector 5 (City of Vero Beach) Beach and Dune Renourishment, March 6, 2018. Approval of Agreement - Aptim Environmental & Infrastructure, Inc. for Engineering and Biological Support Services for Sector 5 (City of Vero Beach) Beach and Dune Renourishment Project. RFQ# 2018029, April 3, 2018. Approval of Work Order No. 2018029-13 - APTIM Sector 5 Pre -Construction and Engineering Services POTENTIAL FUTURE BOARD ACTIONS Approval of a future 2026 Environmental Monitoring Work Order STRATEGIC PLAN ALIGNMENT Environment OTHER PLAN ALIGNMENT The Sector 5 management area is one of the 8 management areas outlined in the Beach Preservation Plan. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends the BCC authorize Change Order No. 1 to Work Order No. 2018029-13 in the total lump sum amount of $53,375.46. Additionally, staff recommends the BCC authorize the Chairman to execute Change Order No. 1 to Work Order No. 2018029-13 on behalf of the BCC after legal sufficiency approval by the County Attorney. Indian River County, Florida Page 2 of 2 Printed on 11/13/2025 pow "I LegistarT" WORK ORDER NUMBER 2018029-13 CHANGE ORDER NUMBER 1 SECTOR 5 HURRICANES IAN AND NICOLE BEACH AND DUNE RESTORATION PROJECT PRE -CONSTRUCTION AND ENGINEERING SERVICES This Change Order No. 1 to Work Order Number 2018029-13 is entered into as of this day of , 2025 pursuant to that certain Engineering and Biological Support Services Contract for Sector 5 Agreement for Professional Services entered into as of April, 2018 ("Agreement"), by and between Indian River County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida ("COUNTY") and Aptim Environmental and Infrastructure, LLC. ("CONSULTANT"). The COUNTY has selected the CONSULTANT to perform the professional services set forth on Exhibit A, attached to this Work Order and made part hereof by this reference. The professional services will be performed by the CONSULTANT for the fee schedule set forth in Exhibit A. The CONSULTANT will perform the professional services within the timeframe more particularly set forth in Exhibit A, all in accordance with the terms and provisions set forth in the Agreement. Pursuant to paragraph 1.3 of the Agreement, nothing contained in any Work Order shall conflict with the terms of the Agreement and the terms of the Agreement shall be deemed to be incorporated in each individual Work Order as if fully set forth herein. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Work Order as of the date first written above. CONSULTANT BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Aptim Environmental & Infrastructure. LLC. OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY By: Joseph E. Flescher, Chairman Attest: Ryan L. Butler, Clerk of Court and Comptroller By: By: Nicole Sharp, P.E. Date: (seal Deputy Clerk) Coastal Restoration & Modeling Program Manager Approved: By: John Titkanich, Jr., County Administrator Approved as to form and legal sufficiency: By: Jennifer Wintrode Shuler, County Attorney 104 APTIM Exhibit A October 22, 2025 Quintin Bergman Indian River County Natural Resources Department — Coastal Division 1801 27th Street, Building A Vero Beach, FL 32960 Subject: Indian River County, FL Sector 5 — 2018029 — Work Order #13 Pre -construction and Engineering Services Change Order #1 Dear Quintin: Aptim Environmental & Infrastructure, LLC 6401 Congress Avenue, Suite 140 Boca Raton, FL 33487 Tel: +1 561 391 8102 Fax: +1 561 391 9116 www.aptim.com This letter is in response to Indian River County's (County) request for a change order to Work Order #13 for Aptim Environmental & Infrastructure, LLC (APTIM) to perform pre -construction and engineering services to support the Sector 5 Beach and Dune Restoration Project. This Change Order allows APTIM and its subcontractor, Ecological Associates, Inc. (EAI), to continue to perform professional services for late season sea turtle monitoring. APTIM proposes to provide these services on a lump sum basis with a cost of $53,374.46. Included as Exhibit 1 is the Fee Proposal. The scope and fee proposal were developed following the provisions of the Professional Services Agreement between Indian River County and APTIM, dated April 3, 2018, to provide engineering and biological support services in support of the Sector 5 Beach and Dune Restoration Project (RFQ#2018029). Barring any unforeseen circumstances, all work will now be completed within 150 days of receiving the Notice to Proceed. Introduction The scope of work below is for APTIM and its subcontractor's to provide additional pre -construction and engineering services to support the Sector 5 Beach and Dune Restoration Project as proposed in the original scope of work. Due to the high volume of sea turtle nests that have already been relocated under the original contract, additional work is required to perform the tasks outlined below. Task 5: Late Season Sea Turtle Monitoring APTIM will oversee the scope of work proposed by EAI and provide the necessary administrative coordination to the County. EAI has provided the enclosed proposal and cost breakdown for sea turtle monitoring tasks, which states: 105 AAPTIM Cost October 22, 2025 Page 2 of 3 Late season sea turtle monitoring, nest relocation, and ancillary professional services in support of the Sector 5 Beach and Dune Restoration Project. This scope of work was developed based on conditions and requirements set forth in standard regulatory permits and the following documents: • Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) Joint Coastal Permit (JCP) 0363427 -001 -JC • U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) Revised Statewide Programmatic Biological Opinion (BO) dated March 13, 2015 The following tasks may be performed under this work order include: • Task 1: Late Season Sea Turtle Monitoring (FDEP Specific Condition 11) • Task 2: Late Season Nest Relocation and Barricades (FDEP Specific Condition 11) • Task 3: Reporting The lump sum cost for this task is $53,374.46. Summary The total lump sum cost to perform the proposed work described herein for Change Order #1 to Work Order #13 is $53,374.46. Please refer to Exhibit 1, attached to the end of this proposal, for a summary of the costs and labor hours of each Task. APTIM will proceed with the tasks upon receipt of a signed Change Order from Indian River County (unless stated otherwise in the schedule). It is noted that some aspects of this Change Order are dependent upon outside party performance and are outside the control of APTIM and the County. As such, the scope, schedule and cost described herein is provided as an estimate. APTIM will strive to execute each phase of the work within budget and in as expeditious a manner according to construction progress. We will coordinate with the County in the event that the scope, schedule, or budget arise due to unforeseen issues or circumstances. Thank you for the opportunity to serve Indian River County. We look forward to continuing to provide expert professional services to the County. Please do not hesitate to call if you have any questions. Sincerely, Nicole S. Sharp, P.E. Director, Civil and C stall Engineering Aptim Environmental & Infrastructure, LLC Client Authorized Signature Printed Name Title 106 October 22, 2025 AOTIPage 3 of 3 EXHIBIT 1 Secliorl 0.2048M is We* QnW#13 Labor Title Labor Bill Rate Late Season Sea Turtle Nlonitoring Task 5 Labor Hours Cost Labor Hours Yodels Cost Principal Engineer/Sr Proj Mngr $ 250.00 $ 5,200.00 $ 48,174.46 - $ - Program Manager $ 190.00 16 $ 3,040.00 16 $ 3,040.00 Sr Coastal Engineer/Prof Mngr $ 165.00 - $ - Coastal Engineer III $ 150.00 $ - Coastal Engineer II $ 125.00 $ - Coastal Engineer I $ 105.00 - $ - Coastal Modeler II $ 130.00 $ Geologist II $ 95.00 $ Geologist 1 $ 80.00 $ - Senior Marine Biologist $ 135.00 16 $ 2.160.00 16 $ 2,160.00 Professional Surveyor & Mapper $ 145.00 - $ - Senior CAD Operator $ 140.00 $ CAD Operator $ 105.00 $ GIS Operator $ 105.00 $ Bookkeeper $ 80.00 _ $ Clerical $ 71.00 $ Technician $ 60.00 $ Mobilization $ - Sub -Contractors - $ 48,174.46 - $ 48,174.46 TOTAL 32 $ 53,374.46 32 $ 53,374.46 Summary of Cast by Task Task Number Task Name Labor Sub- Mobilization Totals contractors Task 5 Late Season Sea Turtle Monitoring $ 5,200.00 $ 48,174.46 $ 53,374.46 Totals = $ 5,200.00 $ 48,174.46 $ - $ 53,374.46 Submitted By: Nicole Sharp Submitted To: Indian River County, FL Submission Date: 10/22/2025 107 Indian River County, Florida MEMORANDUM �10y' Indian River County Administration Complex 1801 27th Street Vero Beach, Florida 32960 indianriver.gov File ID: 25-1078 Type: Consent Staff Report Meeting Date: 11/18/2025 TO: Board of County Commissioners THROUGH: John A. Titkanich, Jr., County Administrator Nancy A. Bunt, Assistant County Administrator David Schryver, Assistant Public Works Director Danny Ooley, Assistant Public Works Director FROM: AJ Michael, Traffic Operations Manager DATE: November 4, 2025 SUBJECT: Purchase of Traffic Operations Division replacement maintenance sign truck for on-call purposes BACKGROUND Traffic Engineering purchased a 2011 Ford F450 for operational use in supporting signal maintenance, sign installation, and other fieldwork activities. The vehicle has been a key asset in daily operations for over a decade. In August/September of this year, the truck suffered catastrophic engine failure. The truck is 14 years old with over 100,000 miles. No replacement truck was budgeted for Fiscal Year 2025/2026 as the catastrophic failure occurred so late in the fiscal year. The estimated cost to repair the engine is approximately $23,000, making repair not economically feasible given the vehicle's age, mileage and condition. ANALYSIS Traffic Operations obtained a quote under an eligible City of Tallahassee Contract from Alan Jay Fleet Sales for a replacement vehicle at a cost of $71,531. This is inclusive of the additional options that are included to enhance safety, functionality, and suitability for staff needs. The proposed replacement vehicle mirrors the specifications of the existing truck, with the exception that it will be equipped with a gasoline engine. BUDGETARY IMPACT Funds in the amount of $71,531 will be paid from the Transportation Fund/Traffic Engineering/Automotive account, number 11124541-066420. Funds will be made available via budget amendment, if necessary. STRATEGIC PLAN ALIGNMENT This purchase supports the County's strategic goals of maintaining reliable infrastructure and ensuring efficient delivery of public services. Replacing the failed truck will enable Traffic Operations to continue timely maintenance of traffic control devices, promote roadway safety, and minimize service disruptions. Indian River County, Florida Page 1 of 2 Printed on 11/13/2025 pow" jay LegistaripA STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends the Board approve the funding request for the purchase of a replacement truck from Alan Jay Fleet Sales in the amount of $71,531, for the Public Works Department Traffic Operations Division, which includes options totaling $25,285. Indian River County, Florida Page 2 of 2 Printed on 11/13/2025 pow 1160( Legistarn 2026 CHEVY SILVERADO 250OHD REGULAR CAB PICKUP 4WD WT 8' EXTRA OPTIONS The extra options listed for the proposed sign on-call truck are meant to make the vehicle safer, more useful, and better suited for the work my staff. It also is a mirror description to the old truck (Fleet #029) the only difference being gas and not diesel. Gas being the preferred option. Here is a rundown in the order shown on the quote: 1. Crane — The small crane on the back of the truck will help lift and set heavy signposts, preformed concrete bases, and other large equipment. This makes the job easier.and keeps staff from having to lift heavy items by hand. Note — this will be the only crane our department will have. 2. Utility Bed — The utility bed gives us secure, organized storage for tools and parts. It helps keep everything in one place so staff can find what they need quickly while out in the field. Since this truck is taken home by staff for on-call duty, having a utility bed lock ensures tools always stay secure. Also, with multiple people driving this truck, the setup allows everyone to know exactly where tools and materials are stored. 3. Trailer Wiring/Class V Hitch — This is because of the utility bed. By adding these the trailer package can still be used. 4. Spray -In Bed Liner— The liner protects the bed from scratches, rust, and damage caused by loading and unloading materials. It helps the truck bed last longer. 5. Over -Cab Light Bar & strobes —The light bar along with -the strobes are essential for better visibility when working in and on the side of the roadway. This allows the truck to be seen more easily by drivers and improves safety. Contract Number: Quote I D: Agency: Date: 5179 - 2026 CITY OF TALLAHASSEE 66903 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY 10/6/2025 Thank you from the Alan Jay Fleet Team for the opportunity to provide this quotation for (1) 2026 CHEVY SILVERADO 250OHD REGULAR CAB PICKUP 4WD WT 8' BED, please review carefully and contact us with any errors or changes. IVISRP: $47,313.00 Base Price: $45,983.00 Factory Options: $263.00 Aftermarket Options: $25,285.00 Purchase Total: $71,531.00 Per attached vehicle specifications. This quotation is valid as long as the manufacturer is accepting orders for the model year specified. Purchase orders received after factory order cutoff may not be honorable. The vehicle(s) offered on this quotation will be ordered in the color(s) listed. Please contact your Alan Jay sales representative with any questions you have on this quote. Quoted By: ASHLEE WILSON / 863-273-1105 / Ashlee.Wilson@AlanJay.com Corp. 11°`'. Sebring, FL 33870 I FAX 863-402-4221 Sebring, FL 33871-9200 ORIGINAL 0 6/02025 ATE QUICK QUOTE SHEET REVISED101612025E DATE REQUESTING AGENCY INDIAN RIVER COUNTY CONTACT PERSON SHELBY BALL EMAIL sbaII(aANDIANRIVER.GOV PHONE 772-2264416 MOBILE FAX CONTRACT NUMBER 5179 - 2026 CITY OF TALLAHASSEE MODEL CK209031WT MSRP $47,313.00 2026 CHEVY SILVERADO 250OHD REGULAR CAB PICKUP 4WD WT 8' BED CUSTOMER ID **A# vehkdes will be ordered white w1 darkest interior unless clearly stated otherwise on purchase order. GOVERNMENT PRICE $45,983.00 FACTORY OPTIONS DESCRIPTION GAZ Summit White $0.00 -------------------- -------------------- H2G -------------------------------------------.....------------------------------.......------------------------------ Jet Black, Vinyl seat trim ....... -- $0.00 ------------•------ --- ------------------ LOT ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------•------------------ Engine, 6.61. V8 ------------ $0.00 -------------------- MKM Transmission, 10 -Speed automatic •• -- - $0.00 1WT - -------------------- ---------- ---- ---- - OPTIONS Work Truck Preferred Equipment Group$0.00 •- -------------------- ------------------------ 5N5 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Rear Camera Kit -------------------•-------------------- $68.00 -------------------- -------------------- 914 -------------------------------------------------------_...---------------------•------------------------------------------------- Bumper, rear, delete ' $0.00 ------------ ..... - ----------------- 91.3 -------•----•----------•----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------.----- Spare tire delete$0.00 -------------------- ---------------- AZ3 ------------------=-------------------------------------------------------------•------------------------------------------------- Seats, front 40/20/40 split -bench =------------------- $0.00 -------------------- --- ----------------- C7A -- - ------------------------------------------------------•--------------------------------------- - Lowered GVWR,10,000 lbs. (4536 kg) $0.00 -------------------- -------------------- FE9 -------------------------------------•-----------•---....------------------------------------......------------------------------- Emissions, Federal requirements $0.00 -------------------- -•- - ------------------ GT4 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Rear axle, 3.73 ratio $0.00 ---- IOR -- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Audio system, Chevrolet Infotainment 3 system - ------------ $0.00 -------------------- ----------------•------- PYN -------------------------------------------------------------------------•-----............-------------------------•-------------- Wheels, 17" (43.2 cm) painted steel, silver$0.00 -------------------- ------------------------ OXT -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------•-------------------------------- ------- Tires, LT265/70R17E all -terrain, blackwall $195.00 -------------------- --- ------------------ SFW ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Back-up alarm Calibration $0:00 -------------------- --- -----------•------- ZW9 --------------------------------------------------..-.-...---------------------------..-....----------------------------•---------- Pickup bed, delete %00 -------------------- ----------------- -- - - ---------------------------------------------------------------•---------------------------------------------------- Capped Fuel Fill +, -- - -----------------------------...---------------------------------------------------------------------------=----- $0.00 -------------------- FACTORY OPTIONS $263.00 AFTERMARKET OPTIONS DESCRIPTION NO -TEMP TEMP TAG NOT REQUESTED, CUSTOMER WILL HANDLE THEIR OWN TAG WORK. $0.00 ---------- EWD - ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- — EXTENDED WARRANTY DECLINED ------------•------- $0.00 --------------- K CE6K-3 (4/7) -------------------------------------8----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Venturo 20001b Electric Mast Foldin Crane 6,000 It - lbs crane with 2,0001b lifting capacity. Includes 4'-7 manual .................... $8,295.00 boom, adjustable 13 -19" boom rest, 150 amp circuit breaker, includes bumper reinforcement & jack leg. ------------------------ K 6961 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------•---•-------------------------------------------- Knaphelde 8' SRW utility body for 56" CA (Includes 2nd Stage M50, Weight Slip, & Completed Vehicle Certification.) -------------------- $11,180.00 --- -------------------- K 7/4 WIRE --- - --------------- -----...-..--------...----------...------..-....--------------------------------------..-------------------------------------------- 7 way flat camper trailer wiring with 4 prong flat ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ -------------------- $215.00 -------------------- K CLV-SB Class V Hitch for Service Body $915.00 ------------------------ HD USOB-TB ---------..._..-----------------------------------------------------------------------------•---------------------------.----•------ HD Scorpion spray on bed liner applied inside cargo area, tops of boxes, and rear bumper of 8'& T utility body, -------------------- $11165.00 ------- FS LB -4M P2 -SD- ---------------------------------------------------------•----------------------------------------------------------------•------ Ford Super Duty Federal Signal Ailegiant Ughtbar Amber/White Package, Includes 1-Allegiant Ught Bar, -4- Micropulse 6 -------------------- $3,465.00 AW Diode Ught heads, 2 grille mount, 2 surface mounted to tollgate with�whRe betels «: AFTERMARKET O*t*NS $25,285.00 TALLY—INDIAN RIVER COUNTY_66903_Quote_1.PDF Page 1oft ' 3 TRADE IN TOTAL, COST _ $71,531.00 ----------------------- --------------- TOTAL COST LESS TRAIW-1W(S) QTY 1 $71,531.00 .... ..... ...... .. ..... . __ ....._..... ___ .. ...... .. Estimated Annual payments for 60 months paid in advance- $16,446.46 Municipal finance for any essential use vehicle, requires lender approval, WAC. Comments FA� . , xP N _ - Wo" FOR VEHICLE QUOTED BY ASHLEE WILSON GOVERNMENT ACCOUNT MANAGER Ashlee.Wilson(i$Jflwiv.Cum "I Want to be Your Fleet Provider" i appreciate the opportunity to submit this quotation. Please review it carefully. If there are any errors or changes, please feel free to contact me at any time. I am always happy to be of assistance. TALLY—INDIAN RIVER COUNTY_66903_Quote_1.PDF Page 2 of 2 M .4 Alan Jay Fleet Ashlee Wilson -Dickman 1 863-402-4234 1 ashlee.wilson@alanjay.com Vehicle: [Fleet] 2026 Chevrolet Silverado 250OHD (CC20903) 2WD Reg Cab 142" Work Truck ( d Complete ) Note:Photo may not represent exact vehicle or selected equipment. Window Sticker [Fleet] 2026 Chevrolet Silverado 250OHD (CC20903) 2WD Reg Cab 142" Work Truck MSRP:$45,600.00 Interior:Jet Black, Vinyl seat trim Exterior 1:Summit White Exterior 2: No color has been selected. Engine, 6.61- V8 Transmission, 10 -Speed automatic CODE MODEL MSRP CC20903 [Fleet] 2026 Chevrolet Silverado 250OHD (CC20903) 2WD Reg Cab $45,600.00 142" Work Truck OPTIONS 1WT Work Truck Preferred Equipment Group $0.00 5N5 Rear Camera Kit $73.00 9J4 Bumper, rear, delete Inc. 91-3 Spare tire delete Inc. AZ3 Seats, front 40/20/40 split -bench $0.00 This document contains information considered Confidential between GM and its Clients uniquely. The information provided is not intended for public disclosure. Prices, specifications, and availability are subject to change without notice, and do not include certain fees, taxes and charges that may be required by law or vary by manufacturer or region. Performance figures are guidelines only, and actual performance may vary. Photos may not represent actual vehicles or exact configurations. Content based on report preparer's input is subject to the accuracy of the input provided. Data Version: 26654. Data Updated: Oct 2, 2025 6:46:00 PM PDT. Oct 6, 2025 Page 2 loq Alan Jay Fleet Ashlee Wilson -Dickman 1 863-402-4234 1 ashlee.wilson@alanjay.com -............. __..-_..-.......................... ...... ----.-.... __.... ......... _................... I..._....._._. - ........ -.... .......... _-.._.. Vehicle: [Fleet] 2026 Chevrolet Silverado 250OHD (CC20903) 2WD Reg Cab 142" Work Truck (4 Complete ) C7A Lowered GVWR, 10,000 lbs. (4536 kg) $0.00 FE9 Emissions, Federal requirements $0.00 GAZ Summit White $0.00 GT4 Rear axle, 3.73 ratio $0.00 H2G Jet Black, Vinyl seat trim $0.00 IOR Audio system, Chevrolet Infotainment 3 system $0.00 L8T Engine, 6.6L V8 $0.00 MKM Transmission, 10 -Speed automatic $0.00 PYN Wheels, 17" (43.2 cm) painted steel, Silver $0.00 QXT Tires, LT265/70R17E all -terrain, blackwall $200.00 SFW Back-up alarm calibration Inc. ZW9 Pickup bed, delete ($1,155.00) _ Capped Fuel Fill Inc. SUBTOTAL $44,718.00 Adjustments Total $0.00 Destination Charge $2,595.00 TOTAL PRICE $47,313.00 FUEL ECONOMYMM f ,..u,.. ,. �� ��...,. MQN, x�, . - ��x_,�.w Est City:N/A Est Highway:N/A Est Highway Cruising Range:N/A This document contains information considered Confidential between GM and its Clients uniquely. The information provided is not intended for public disclosure. Prices, specifications, and availability are subject to change without notice, and do not include certain fees, taxes and charges that may be required by law or vary by manufacturer or region. Performance figures are guidelines only, and actual performance may vary. Photos may not represent actual vehicles or exact configurations. Content based on report preparer's input is subject to the accuracy of the input provided. Data Version: 26654. Data Updated: Oct 2, 2025 6:46:00 PM PDT. Oct 6, 2025 Page 3 to l -� Alan Jay Fleet Ashlee Wilson -Dickman 1 863-402-4234 1 ashlee.wilson@alanjay.com Vehicle: [Fleet] 2026 Chevrolet Silverado 250OHD (CC20903) 2WD Reg Cab 142" Work Truck (d Complete) Standard Equipment Packag Mechanical Trailering Package includes trailer hitch, 7 -pin connector and (CTT) Hitch Guidance (Deleted when (ZW9) pickup bed delete is ordered.) Engine, 6.6L V8 with Direct injection and Variable Valve Timing, gasoline, (401 hp [299 kWj @ 5200 rpm, 464 Ib -ft of torque [629 N -m) @ 4000 rpm) (STD) Transmission, automatic (STD) (Standard with (LST) 6.61- V8 gas engine.) _....._..... _.................. _........... ..................................... _._... ..... __................. _..-.................... _........................... __..._........... __....._-........ _............. ............................. _................ ......... _........_____-.... _..._.......... ................ _.......... ......._...... _... _.......... Rear axle, 3.73 ratio (Requires (L8T) 6.6L V8 gas engine. Not available with (L513) Durernax 6.61- Turbo -Diesel V8 engine.) Dumbed, pickup bed (STD) Lowered GVWR, 10,000 tbs. (4536 kg) lowers GVtNR and sign cantly decreases towing.and/or payload ratings` (STD) (C"20903, CC20753 and CC20953 models require (L8T)'6.6L V8 gas engine. (LM Duramax 6.61, Tarbo- Diesel V8 engine is not available on the following models: C*20903, CC20753 and CC20953. With (ZW9) pickup bed delete, requires (QXT) Tires. When (L5P) engine is ordered on C*20943 or CK20953 models (QHQ) tires are not available.) Push Button Start Air filter, heavy-duty Air filtration monitoring Auto -locking rear differential _ Rear wheel drive .._ ...... _..... _.... _.... _... _....... ....................... ....................... ........... .-I-_ ....... _.._..... _........ _............................ ................. ..... ...... _..... ........._................... ..........................._............... _._.... ............... .... __....... _....... _.... ........................... _......... ........ _..... _........... _.... ........ ....................... I .......... _...... _... _..-._ .. Cooling, external engine oil cooler Cooling, auxiliary external transmission oil cooler ._._....... --...... _.......... _. _. ... . _..._ .._....._.................._._._..----..,� —_..._...._..._............_._...._..._..-- — _.. _..._.. __..._... _ - ..._._..__..,_.._..._ _ --- Battery, heavy-duty 720 cold -cranking amps/80 Amp -hr maintonance-free with rundown protetfion and retained accessory power (Included and only available with (L8T) 6AL V8 gas engine.) Brake lining wear indicator This document contains information considered Confidential between GM and its Clients uniquely. The information provided is not intended for public disclosure. Prices, specifications, and availability are subject to change without notice, and do not include certain fees, taxes and charges that may be required by law or vary by manufacturer or region. Performance figures are guidelines only, and actual performance may vary. Photos may not represent actual vehicles or exact configurations. Content based on report preparer's input is subject to the accuracy of the input provided. Data Version: 26654. Data Updated: Oct 2, 2025 6:46:00 PM PDT. Oct 6, 2025 Page 4 ^ �p� I Alan Jay Fleet Ashlee Wilson -Dickman 1 863-402-4234 1 ashlee.wilson@alanjay.com Vehicle: (Fleet] 2026 Chevrolet Silverado 250OHD (CC20903) 2WD Reg Cab 142" Work Truck (d Complete) Tires, LT245/75R17E ......_.. .._. all -season, blackwall (STD) ! - .............--...._. ----..........__._._....._..............................................._.._-_..- .............. ................... ---._....... .... __- ._ ___-....._..._.._..-------_..._........._..............-.._.._.._-__................ _....................... _......._.... _..-------- Tire, spare LT245/75R17E all -season, blackwall (STD) (included and only available with (QHQ) LT245/75R17E all -season, blackwall tires with (E63) Durabed, pickup bed. Available to order when (ZW9) pickup bed delete and (QHQ) LT245/75R17E all -season, blackwall tires are ordered.) ..................................... ......... ................................. ................................. .......................... I ................... --.--._._..................... _......................... __.... ........ _........ --.... _.......... __.... ............................. ......................... ....._.................. _............................... ........ _.... _... _............................. .............. _._...... -..... .................................... _....... __..... _..... _.......... Tire carrier lock keyed cylinder lock that utilizes same key as ignition and door (Deleted with (ZW9) pickup bed delete.) ...... . .................. ............................... ......... _...... _..... ..... _... __...................................... _... _........... ................. _.... _........ ....... _......................... _....................... _._............................................... _._ .. Bumpers, front, Black ............ ............ _......_....... _........... _._...._.......... .._._........................... ---------.._.._.._........ _............... _.................. ....__.._...._...---..................... ..-. - - Bumpers, rear, Black ....................... _............ _............................ _... ............. ____ _ ComerStep, rear bumper BedStep, Black integrated on forward portion of bed on driver and passenger side (Deleted when (ZW9) pickup bed delete is ordered.) _.......... — --... ........... _.......... __............. _._..... _--.----............_.._........_......_._................ ........ _... ......... ..................... ... _._....... ..._—........ -- ... ....... _._........ _ . _ Moldings, beltline, Black -- ......... ----.......... ..........................................._...._..__.........._. _............................ .....I. _.............. . __...... ...... ............................... __...................... .._...... _...... _-._......... _...................................... __...... -- - - ._._.... ._.- ------- ............... __ _...._.._..._._............. .......... ...... _.......... __._......._....... Cargo tie downs (12), fixed rated at SW Its per comer (Deleted with (ZW9) pickup bed delete.) Headlamps, halogen reflector with halogen Daytime Running Lamps .--- ........ .................... _........_.._..._.__...__..__._.._.............. .................. _...... ........ ..-........._......_....._........ -... _._....------- --._ .............. --- _.._.._......... _... __— - - IntelliBeam, automatic high beam on/off ................... ......... _......... _-....... _._............. ............. ............. ......................... _...... _------ ..-._......_...... ... .-....._...................... _........... --.... _............... _.... _.................. ....._......._ ._....._._......._....._.__....... ............... .......__.............. .................... _... _... _.._..._..._ .... . Taillampe with incandescent tail, stop and reverse lights _ Lamps, cargo area, cab�mounted integrated with center high mount stop lamp, with switch in bank on left side of steering wheel .._... ........ - ---------- —.._...._._..__........ ............ _... ................ — - - _ ..._.........._.._ .._ ..__._._...---..__..__......_....._..__.._..._ _ _- --._........ ........ .................................... _........._......._...._........... ...... ................... ........................................ __. Mirrors, outside power -adjustable vertical trailering with heated upper glass, lower convex mirrors, integrated tum signals, manual folding/extending (extends 3.31" 184.25mmD (Standard on Regular Cab models. Not available with (PCV) WT Convenience Package or (ZLQ) WT Fit Convenience Package on Regular Cab. Included and only available with (PCV) WT Convenience Package or (ZLQ) WT Fleet Convenience Package on Double and Crew Cab models.) ...... .......... _........... ............ ................. _.................... _.............. _... _...__._..._........... ................. . - - - - Mirror caps, Black Glass, solar . absorbing, tinted _ _.---__........ ... ___........___.... ......... _............ ..... —_.._.___....______._............_.._.._... _._________................... ......-__ _ ___ Tailgate, standard (Deleted with (ZW9) pickup bed delete.) ..... .................... ....... -........ ....____._.._._.._..... ....................... _..---............ _... _.......... ....... ................. _ — Tailgate and bed rail protection cap, top .. ......... _._..... _.._-__-...... -.... _................. ....... .-.... _.............. _.......... ---._..._._-......._....._........ I ........... . __.... -_.._.... _................... _.._.. — -_...._....__....._..-..-._..._....._..-- - Tailgate, locking, utilizes same key as ignition and door (Upgraded to (QT5) EZ Lift power lock and release tailgate when (PCV) WT Convenience Package or (ZLQ) WT Fleet Convenience Package is ordered. Not available with (ZW9) pickup bed delete.) This document contains information considered Confidential between GM and its Clients uniquely. The information provided is not intended for public disclosure. Prices, specifications, and availability are subject to change without notice, and do not include certain fees, taxes and charges that may be required by law or vary by manufacturer or region. Performance figures are guidelines only, and actual performance may vary. Photos may not represent actual vehicles or exact configurations. Content based on report preparer's input is subject to the accuracy of the input provided. Data Version: 26654. Data Updated: Oct 2, 2025 6:46:00 PM PDT. Oct 6, 2025 0q t Alan Jay Fleet Ashlee Wilson -Dickman 1 863-402-4234 1 ashlee.wilson@alanjay.com Vehicle: [Fleet] 2026 Chevrolet Silverado 250OHD (CC20903) 2WD Reg Cab 142" Work Truck (d Complete) Tailgate, gate function manual, no EZ Lift (Deleted with (ZW9) pickup bed delete.) Door handles, Black grained Entertainment Audio system, Chevrolet Infotainment 3 system 7 diagonal HD color touchscreen, AM/FM stereo, Bluetooth audio streaming for 2 active devices, voice command pass-through to phone, Wireless Apple CarPlay and Wireless Android Auto compatibility (STD) Audio system feature, 2 -speakers (Requires Regular Cab model.) Wireless phone projection for Apple CarPlay and Android Auto .... ........ _..... _........ _................. _._............................. ........ .... ............. ._..... _.._....._...... _.-... ..._..... _......... ._._..-..._...... ._ _ _._._..--_ Bluetooth for phone connectivity to vehicle infotainment system WkFi Hotspot capable (Terms and limitations apply. See onstarlcom or dealer for details.) Twg Seats, front 40/20/40 split -bench with covered armrest storage and under -seat storage .(lockable) (STD) ._.......................... ... ............. ...... .... _..... . ... _.........._.._._.........._ . ..........._...... _..... __............. ................... ................ _.... .. Vinyl seat trim Seat adjuster, driver 4 -way manual Seat adjuster, passenger 4 -way manual . . ................ _...... _........ _.... _.._._......... _... _............... _.............. _............. -_.... _........ ._...__._..... ... . ............. ..--..__...... -._..._..----___.._._....._._....... _....... Floor .coveting, rubberized -vinyl (Not available with LPO floor liners.) .... - ----........................... ..............._.......... __._.,_.............. --....... ..... _ _ . .. _ Steering wheel, urethane Steering column, Tilt Wheel, manual with wheel locking security feature ._._......_..._._........._......_...._...._..__..... .... .............................. ............ ... ........ ....... ................... ..................... . ... _ ............ Instrument cluster 6 -gauge cluster featuring speedometer, fuel level, engine temperature, tachometer, voltage and oil pressure _ .............. .____._..__........... ................ ....__.._..__..___.._.--........................... __.__------_.___-_......_...... _.......... _...___ Driver information Center, 3.5" diagonal monochromatic display Door locks, power ............ _........... _..__ ___....__..................... ....... _............ __ ------- Remote Keyless Entry with 2 transmitters Cruise control, electronic with set and resume speed, steering wheel -mounted USB Ports, 2, Charge/Date ports located on Instrument panel .......... __..... ..... ......... ....... ---.... _... _..... __... _.................... ... .................. ........ __....._.___.._...................... _._..._ - _ _ - _...__.._.._.._.. Power outlet, front auxiliary, 12 -volt Air conditioning, single -zone This document contains information considered Confidential between GM and its Clients uniquely. The information provided is not intended for public disclosure. Prim, specifications, and availability are subject to change without notice, and do not include certain fees, taxes and charges that may be required by law or vary by manufacturer or region. Performance figures are guidelines only, and actual performance may vary. Photos may not represent actual vehicles or exact configurations. Content based on report preparer's input is subject to the accuracy of the input provided. Data Version: 26654. Data Updated: Oct 2, 2025 6:46:00 PM PDT. Oct 6, 2025 t Page 6 L0 Alan Jay Fleet Ashlee Wilson -Dickman 1 863-402-4234 1 ashlee.wilson@alanjay.com Vehicle: [Fleet] 2026 Chevrolet Silverado 250OHD (CC20903) 2WD Reg Cab 142" Work Truck (4 Complete) Mirror, inside rearview, manual tilt Assist handles front A -pillar mounted for driver and passenger, rear B -pillar mounted Chevrolet Connected Access capable (Subject to terms. See onstar.com or dealer for details.) Front Pedestrian Braking StabiliTrak stability control system with Proactive Roll Avoidance and traction control, includes electronic trailer sway control and hill start assist Daytime Running Lamps with automatic exterior lamp control � ���„� �'g�� 3 Airbags, Dual -stage frontal airbags for driver and front outboard passenger; Seat -mounted side -impact airbags for driver and front outboard passenger; Head -curtain airbags for front and rear outboard seating positions; Includes front outboard Passenger Sensing System for frontal outboard passenger airbag (Always use seat belts and child restraints. Children are safer when properly secured in a rear seat in the appropriate child restraint. See the Owner's Manual for more information.) OnStar Services capable (See onstar.com for details and limitations. Services vary by model. Service plan required.) HD Rear Vision Camera (Deleted when (ZW9) pickup bed delete is ordered.) Hitch Guidance dynamic single line to aid in trailer alignment for hitching (Deleted with (ZW9) pickup bed delete.) Lane Departure Warning Following Distance Indicator Forward Collision Alert Buckle to Drive prevents vehicle from being shifted out of Park until driver seat belt is fastened; times out after 20 seconds and encourages seat belt use, can be turned on and off in Settings menu Teen Driver a configurable feature that lets you activate customizable vehicle settings associated with a key fob, to help encourage safe driving behavior. It can limit certain available vehicle features, and it prevents certain safety systems from being turned off. An in -vehicle report card gives you information on driving habits and helps you to continue to coach your new driver Tire Pressure Monitoring System This document contains information considered Confidential between GM and its Clients uniquely. The information provided is not intended for public disclosure. Prices, specifications, and availability are subject to change without notice, and do not include certain fees, taxes and charges that may be required by law or vary by manufacturer or region. Performance figures are guidelines only, and actual performance may vary. Photos may not represent actual vehicles or exact configurations. Content based on report preparer's input is subject to the accuracy of the input provided. Data Version: 26654. Data Updated: Oct 2, 2025 6:46:00 PM PDT. Oct 6, 2025 Page Z .t O Alan Jay Fleet Ashlee Wilson -Dickman 1 863-402-4234 1 ashlee.wilson@alanjay.com Vehicle: [Fleet] 2026 Chevrolet Silverado 250OHD (CC20903) 2WD Reg Cab 142" Work Truck Complete ) This document contains information considered Confidential between GM and its Clients uniquely. The information provided is not intended for public disclosure. Prices, specifications, and availability are subject to change without notice, and do not include certain fees, taxes and charges that may be required by law or vary by manufacturer or region. Performance figures are guidelines only, and actual performance may vary. Photos may not represent actual vehicles or exact configurations. Content based on report preparer's input is subject to the accuracy of the input provided. Data Version: 26654. Data Updated: Oct 2, 2025 6:46:00 PM PDT. Oct 6, 2025 OnStar Basics (OnStar Fleet Basics for Fleet) Drive confidently with core OnStar services including remote commands, built-in voice assistance, real-time traffic and navigation, and Automatic Crash Response to help if you're in need. (Requires (UE1) OnStar. OnStar Basics includes remote commands, Navigation, Voice Assistance, and Automatic Crash Response, for eligible vehicles with compatible software. OnStar Basics is standard for 8 years; OnStar plan, working electrical system, cell reception and GPS signal required. OnStar links to emergency services. Service coverage varies with conditions and location. Service availability, features and functionality vary by device and software version. See onstar.com for details and limitations.) Trailering Information Label provides max trailer ratings for tongue weight, conventional, gooseneck and 5th wheel trailering (Not available with (ZW9) pickup bed delete.) NA Now, Warranty Note: <<< Preliminary 2026 Warranty »> Basic Years: 3 Basic Miles/km: 36,000 Drivetrain Years: 5 Drivetrain Miles/km: 60,000 Drivetrain Note: 3.OL & 6.OL Duramax@ Turbo -Diesel engines, and certain commercial, government, and qualified fleet vehicles: 5 years/100,000 miles Corrosion Years (Rust -Through): 6 Corrosion Years: 3 Corrosion Miles/km (Rust -Through): 100,000 Corrosion Miles/km: 36,000 Roadside Assistance Years: 5 Roadside Assistance Miles/km: 60,000 Roadside Assistance Note: 3.OL & 6.OL Duramax® Turbo -Diesel engines, and certain commercial, government, and qualified fleet vehicles: 5 years/100,000 miles Maintenance Note: First Visit: 12 Months/12,000 Miles This document contains information considered Confidential between GM and its Clients uniquely. The information provided is not intended for public disclosure. Prices, specifications, and availability are subject to change without notice, and do not include certain fees, taxes and charges that may be required by law or vary by manufacturer or region. Performance figures are guidelines only, and actual performance may vary. Photos may not represent actual vehicles or exact configurations. Content based on report preparer's input is subject to the accuracy of the input provided. Data Version: 26654. Data Updated: Oct 2, 2025 6:46:00 PM PDT. Oct 6, 2025 Alan Jay Fleet Ashlee Wilson -Dickman 1 863-402-4234 1 ashlee.wilson@alanjay.com Vehicle: [Fleet] 2026 Chevrolet Silverado 250OHD (CC20903) 2WD Reg Cab 142" Work Truck Complete) Technical Specifications Transmission ... ..... .... . _.......... ._...... _...... ...._............................. _... _...... ... _.... _._._._._.......... _................. _............... ....... .. _...._..... _..... ...... _-__._... _.._.............. _........ _.__........ -._............ _ Drivetrain Rear Wheel Drive Trans Order Code MKM -_-- ---- - - --.......... --......... _.............. _......... ....... _- -- ... .._ .......... Trans Type ......... ......... ......... 10 ._ . . ................ __.... _................ ..._........... _..................... .......... ........ ........ _.... _..... _...._... _.... -----....._................._...................... Trans Description Cont. Again .... ..... ......................................... ........... ............_................. N/A _................ ---... ... .................... ...... ........................ --..... ..... .................... _....... _........ _...-....... _._.._....... _...... ...............-......... ... Second Gear Ratio (A) 2.87 __..__.... ................... _._......... --.... .--__-.......__.........._.._._.................................._.._...._.._..._................_.. Fourth Gear Ratio (A) ----............................ _.................... 1.72 . . ....................... _.............. _.... -.....__............. _............ -._.................................. ............... .......... .................. Sixth Gear Ratio (:1) .................... _.... ... _... .............. ......... ............ ................_.. 1.26 Clutch Size NIA-- .-- ................. ...................._.__.._..--- ._... _........... _--.._..__............................. - ............... Final Drive Axle Ratio (:1) _._._.-..--...._.._-.._._._......................... NIA _....._ _...... _........ _ --- ........... _...... _........... ..................... _.__............ _._............ _...... _..... _................ ............ ... ........ .... ..............._....._......._....._.._........ Transfer Case Gear Ratio (:1), High _......... N/A Transfer Case Power Take Off N/A — .... ...... _._...... ..............._.._..........__.....---........__......----..._.__....._......_........._............._.___. Eighth Gear Ratio (:1) 0.85 ...... _...... -..... -............. ........................................................._................................._......._..................................._...._._... Tenth Gear Ratio (:1) 0.63 Mileage ._..... _.............. ..........__...._......_..__........_...._.... ----- .... - --._......_....... EPA Fuel Economy Est - Hwy N/A .__ .... _...... _..... ............ .-...... -................................. ................ .._....... _........... -........................................... _.._.......... EPA Fuel Economy Est - City NIA Cruising Range - Hwy NIA Engine _......._ ............. ............ ......... ................... ._..... _..... ..._............. _..._....................................... _..................... _.......... _.._......... Engine Order Code L8T :Displacement --- ........... .. .........-...._ ----- ----...................... _ SAE Net Horsepower @ RPM ._..._ .......... --.........................._............_......_...._.._._....._........... Engine Oil Cooler Electrical -- -...._... --.....----.............................._.._...._._...._..__.._...... ---- - .. Cold Cranking Amps @ 0° F (Primary) .......... -._-....... ..__......... ......................................_........__......................._......._............... Cold Cranking Amps @ 0° F (3rd) 6.6U -TBD - 401 @ 5200 Yes .......... _......... Trans Description Cont. _._.._._...... _______ ... ......... _... ................ Automatic ........... .._... _...... ....... _......__..____-----._..._..._..__.,..._._........_..............._.._..---......._..._._........_...._..............--- First Gear Ratio (:1) — ...... -.............. 4.54 .._.._............ _.... _........ _......... .._..... _...... —._.._.__...- -.....-.._-.................... _.._.._._.... _._.._... _....... — ........ _... _... .._..._._..........__..._._...- Third Gear Ratio (:1) 2.06 — - —_._._.._......._...................... Fifth Gear Ratio (:1) ---- 1.48 _._._..... _._.._..._......__.._ ................ -..... _............... _.... - .... ......... _...... _ ._.._.... __.............. Reverse Ratio (:1) .._ .................. 4.54 Trans Power Take Off N/A ----- --_____ Transfer Case Model _..-._..................... _...--- _- - N/A ........... ............ ..... — ---...__.___..---....---- Transfer Case Gear Ratio (:1), Low ..._ ._ _......................... _------ - N/A (:1) Seventh Ge=(: 1.00 _._....._......________...... .............__...__.-_.---___-..--_..___..................... _ _—__------..----___.._ Ninth Gear ) .... 0.89 Cruising Range City N/A ............... ...._....,--..7 .... --._........... _......... -.._......_...._........ _.... -_­'..._­ Fuel .._...___Fuel Economy Est -Combined WA Estimated Battery Range N/A Engine'Type Gas V8 Fuel System Direct Injection ... _........ _-.__.__........... .......- .......... __._.__.. _. SAE Net Torque @ RPM 464 @ 4000 ............... - - ............... .._._...... _. ....... -- —_ —__ -_......... .............. ---....--- ----_--_•--.._....._. 720 Cold Cranking Amps @ 0° F (2nd) N/A ........... _... -_............. ._--.._........ .... ................. ._... _.... ...._._..------...__p.........�.._...._..-.�_�____..._._............ WA Maximum Altemator Capacity (amps) 170 This document contains information considered Confidential between GM and its Clients uniquely. The information provided is not intended for public disclosure. Prices, specifications, and availability are subject to change without notice, and do not include certain fees, taxes and charges that may be required by law or vary by manufacturer or region. Performance figures are guidelines only, and actual performance may vary. Photos may not represent actual vehicles or exact configurations. Content based on report preparer's input is subject to the accuracy of the input provided. Data Version: 26654. Data Updated: Oct 2, 2025 6:46:00 PM PDT. Oct 6, 2025 Page L i'tz Alan Jay Fleet Ashlee Wilson -Dickman 1 863-402-4234 1 ashlee.wilson@alanjay.com ............ ...... 1.1...1..1 _.. _.................... .... ................................. _... __._........... _.... _............._._.. -- ....---.............. _---................... --..... -_---_--.... ....... _... _.................. .... W ............................. .... -... -.._................ _....... ... Vehicle: [Fleet] 2026 Chevrolet Silverado 250OHD (CC20903) 2WD Reg Cab 142" Work Truck Complete ) Powertrain ,. Cooling System Total Cooling System Capacity N/A Emissions Tons/yr of CO2 Emissions @ 15K mi/year N/A EPA Greenhouse Gas Score N/A Weight Information ;- _ .._.......... ...__._...__..__.............. _.... _._.._.-............. _..._._ ................. .......... --_...... _............9............ ... ......_........... ............................. .... _........... Standard Weight - Front .......................... .-._....._................ ... _......................... ....... 0.00 lbs _._ h_I........._..._........_..._....._....._._...__..- Standard t Rear ... 0.00 lbs _ ....... __-......... -...................................... ......................__......---........_....__.........._................................--..-_ Base Curb Weight ............. NIA — __._..............__.._....----..._ Gross Axle Wt Rating - Front 4400 lbs Gross Axle Wt Rating - Rear 6390 lbs Curb Weight - Front — . _.__... .................... _....... ....... ........... _......... ... 3471 lbs .... .... . -.._... ..... _........ ... .................... _.... _.._..._..._._ _...._..._.._._._.__ .... __......................................... __........ _.................. .................................................. Curb Weight - Rear _... __............... _..................... ..... ................_......... 2603 lbs _-..__......... ................................. Option Weight -Front .... - -... - ..__..............._..._._._ 0.00 lbs ... -- - .................. ----.--------- ..._..._..... _.... _--_...--.... -..... ...----_................. ................._........_.._..._......._..--------.......................__...._........._......_----.. Option Weight - Rear 0.00 lbs __.................. .__-_-._...... _.. Reserve Axle Capacity - Front 929.00 lbs Reserve Axle Capacity - Rear 3787.00 lbs _ - As Speed Curb Weight _ �.........._.._......_.._.._-_..._.._-...-__...................-..._..__..__._....._..__................_... 6074.00 lbs _ .... _............. ................... ................... -........... _........................................... _... _....... As Speed Payload -...... _.._...................... ....... .... ............ .......... ..... __..... __... _........ 3926.00 lbs ...... ......... .............. ...... _..... _--_.._.._.._ Maximum Payload Capacity 3925.00 lbs - ...... _..... _.... ___-.-___._._...___....______....... ..............._..__.-------------- Gross Combined Wt Rating __.................. .......... ... _... _.......... ....... __..____.._._ 24500 lbs ................... _- Gross Axle Weight Rating 10790.00 lbs ..........._9_...._.__............._............................................................... _................._..._..._ Curb Weight _... 11.1_.1. __-- .1......1.1.............. 6074.00 lbs ....._...__._...._p� ..._.. __...._.__.._...... Reserve Axle Ca -- ...... _............. ......... .... _.__............... ......................... ___ ......_._........_.............._.__.........._ 4716.00 lbs .................... ---.--...__.......... _1.......1 11 _- -_1111. ... _-....._._........... _._...._. _............................ _ .. . __ .__................ Total Option Weight .......-_ ..............._..... -__ 0.00 lbs .. -.......... Payload Weight Front - .. 0 lbs .... ........ 1..-- _ ..�._ ._................... _..- .. ....... _..- - - - -.._...._........... .................. _... ....... ..............................._- ht Rear Payload Weight -...... _...... _..... _.......... .__.... --.................................. ..._.__.......... 0 lbs .................. _..... ....................... ._._..._._.. _ 1111 - .... Gross Vehicle Weight Rating . 10000.00 lbs Trailering Dead Weight Hitch - Max Trailer Wt. 50001bs ........... ..... ..1_ - -_._..._--.......... ......_................. ........ -.-___----_... .......... Wt Distributing Hitch - Max Trailer Wt. _......_.._................... --.-----............. 14500 lbs .................1..1.... _..__._............_............... ......_._............ _..... ........... _.... _._.................. ............. Fifth Wheel Hitch - Max Trailer Wt. _............... __._..... ...... _.__._.............................. 187W lbs Maximum Trailering Capacity 14500 lbs Frame ................ _....... ..... _... _...... -.......... _......................................... ..._................... _..................._.................... Frame Type _........... _..... _---..._...... _._-._......_..................... Hydroformed Frame RBM N/A� _..._._..... -....... -........... ......................... -.... ---.._.........._....._.__............_............._...._.._...._.._..-- Frame Thickness ---.... -............. N/A .- Dead 1Mtslght Hitch Max Tongue Wt. - -500 lbs .....1.1.... _----.__ __ _._..__._.......__----- _._........ ........ .1.1.1.1- _--- Wt Distributing Hitch - Max Tongue Wt. 1450 lbs _ ................. _..__....... _............................. .T-- --------_._........._-_.......... _ .._.... _.._............ Fifth Wheel Hitch - Max Tongue Wt. 4675 lbs Sect Modulus Rails Only Frame Strength WA WA This document contains information considered Confidential between GM and its Clients uniquely. The information provided is not intended for public disclosure. Prices, specifications, and availability are subject to change without notice, and do not include certain fees, taxes and charges that may be required by law or vary by manufacturer or region. Performance figures are guidelines only, and actual performance may vary. Photos may not represent actual vehicles or exact configurations. Content based on report preparer's input is subject to the accuracy of the input provided. Data Version: 26654. Data Updated: Oct 2, 2025 6:46:00 PM PDT. Oct 6, 2025 PaV�A -°5 Alan Jay Fleet Ashlee Wilson -Dickman 1 863-402-4234 1 ashlee.wilson@alanjay.com _....................... .......... .... .... .... ......... ........................... _........--... _-....... --............. _.............................. -..---._.._._.....__._................. ............ _...... _....... __.----_-_-.................. ......... .... _....... _ _ _ --- --------------- Vehicle: ------- ----Vehicle: [Fleet] 2026 Chevrolet Silverado 250OHD (CC20903) 2WD Reg Cab 142" Work Truck Complete ) Suspension Suspension Type - Front Short/Long Arm Suspension Type -Rear, , ---_-_..._.._...._.._.._..... -- --- __,......_............. MuWLeaf Springs - - _ _ ...._............................--------._._..........................._.._...._......-- ---....._......_............ Spring Capacity - Front ........ _............... - - ......_-_............ N/A _..._- Spat Capacity Rear :.: N/A .... _..... _............................... ......... ........................................................ Axle Type - Front .._._............... _.... ...... _._._......... _... _.. _........_..... N/A _....... ---...._.__...._.._-........ _........... _......._._..__......__._... Axle Type - Rear _._... _.._.__... _............................. WA Axle Capacity - Front - N/A Axle Capacity - Rear _.-_................_......... _ _ _................ ... ..... ........ - - _-... WA __... ............. .... _...._... ...... ........... .................... ............. .................... ..... _... ..._...........__.................... _... ........................ _... _.... ......_.._._ Axle Ratio (A) - Front ._..... _......................... ---........ N/A ...... ......... Axis Ratio (:1) - Rear ­.._..--­ 3.73 .... _... _................_.._........................ _._....... _... _._ .... . .... ............ ..................................... __._... _._.............. _....................... ......................_........ _..... __........... Shock Absorber Diameter - Front .... _....... .................................. .....__........... ....... ---...... 51 mm _..y ...... .... -....... _..__..._.._...._...._._..........._........ Shook Absorber Diameter - Rear 51 mm Stabilizer Bar Diameter - Front. 1.38 in Stabilizer Bar Diameter - Rear = ' N/A Tlres ................. --..... .... _......... ._...... .._..._.... .................. ........................... ..... ...... .......... -_....._....._..._...._..._............... Front Tire Order Code ... .............. ....... .__........... ......... ...... _...... OXT _......---............................ .... .._..........._.._...._....... _._.... _...... ............................ .............. Rear Tire Order Code _...... .. _..__._......._........ .................... OXT Spare Tire Order Code _ N/A Front Tire Size �- - ---- --_ __ _-_-__........................._....................._._.............._......._.......--------------------- LT265/70R17 __... --.... -... ... ......................... .._. ---- --............ _..... ............... --...... --...... ................. ..................................._...._-..._..__.........__....._..._.........................._.._ Rear Tire Size LT26WOR17 Spare Tire Size N/A -- .__.._ ......... .... _._....... ............ _._............... _......... __... _.................... _._.............. _..................... _............_ Front Tire Capacity ....................... _.._..........__......... ................. ........ _..... N/A ....... -................ _.... _... .......-..._..-.._... .... _.............. _..................._.--..... _.... _.._......... -..... -------- Rear Tire Capacity ......................................... _.......... .- WA Spare Tire Capacity WA ............ ........ --.............. -.... _ Revolutions/Mile @ 45 mph - Front _...... -......._ ...._.._..._........... ...__._ ..........._..._.. _ ____—_— WA -------................ _.__ _............. _.......... ....._ __............. ........ ........ _................ ...... _..--.---....---..___..-_... Revolutions/Mile Q 45 mph - Rear .... N/A Revolutions/Mile @ 45 mph - Spare WA Wheels Front Wheel Size 17 x -TBD- in Rear Wheel Size 17 x -TBD- in ........ _......... .._....._...----.................... ........... ........ _........ _........ __.... _......... _................... Spare Wheel Size .._.... _....... _.................. _ ........_..........__...... N/A ............. _._.__.... ............... ....... _........ _.............. ....- -- - -.._.. Front Wheel Material ........ _........ _.._...._._.......... _.. - - ___._.-............................... ... Steel _._.__.._............... ..........-...... _... ............... _...._. -- .......... _-...... _... _...... _............... _........................ _..... _...... _._...._..... _.............. ............ .............................................. Rear Wheel Material .__................ _...... _.._... ...... .............. ._.. Steel ..... ---..... _.......... __...... _.......... ................... ._........................ Spare Wheel Material WA Stesring ......_.. ----- ._............... I ...._. . ---....._._.--.__..... _............... ................._...._..__..__.._...----................_........._......................_._....., Steering Type ....------._..............__.............................. Pwr' Ratio :1), Overall Steering( ----- N/A - __._...._.............................. .......................................... _........................................ ....... .......................................... Steering Ratio (A), On Center ....... .... ........ .... ................................... _. N/A ..... _... _...-_...... _................ _.._._._._.._....... ..._................ .._._.............._.........._.._--- Steering Rath (a), At Lock .................. - _ -- N/A - -___ _...._.... _... _... ._ ......... _..-........ ........ ......... ...... _.... __......... ---... ...................... _..__ ... ................. _......... ----.... Turning Diameter - Curb to Curb ............... _._... ............... I ............... ..... ..... - 46.9 ft - ..__.......__..._........ -..._..._...._..---..._.. Turning Diameter - Wall to Wall WA Brakes ... ............... _.......................... ._....._...............__.._._._...._.._._.._......_............................................_..............._........_._........._..._...................................._....._.._._...._..._._..._.............. Brake Type Pwr ._......... _._.._..._.._.... _... ---.... ............................._................._........_.... -..._............. _ Brake ABS System _.......... .... _-......... ...... ---- 4 -Wheel --........._ ---.---._................... _.... _..__......................... _...._.... ..._.._-.._.._._.._.._............................. Brake ABS System (Second Line) _----........................... ........ ... WA --- .._.. - -..._................ _.­_._._._.... __...... Disc - Front (Yes or Yes Disc - Rear (Yes or Yes Front Brake Rotor Diem x Thickness 14.0 x 1.6 in This document contains information considered Confidential between GM and its Clients uniquely. The information provided is not intended for public disclosure. Prices, specifications, and availability are subject to change without notice, and do not include certain fees, taxes and charges that may be required by law or vary by manufacturer or region. Performance figures are guidelines only, and actual performance may vary. Photos may not represent actual vehicles or exact configurations. Content based on report preparer's input is subject to the accuracy of the input provided. Data Version: 26654. Data Updated: Oct 2, 2025 6:46:00 PM PDT. ... _........... —_._.. Oct 6, 2025 Page 011 Y r" Alan Jay Fleet Ashlee Wilson -Dickman 1 863-402-4234 1 ashlee.wilson@alanjay.com Vehicle: [Fleet] 2026 Chevrolet Silverado 250OHD (CC20903) 2WD Reg Cab 142" Work Truck Complete ) Brakes Rear Brake Rotor Diam x Thickness 14.1 x 1.3 in Drum - Rear (Yes or N/A ........ ..__,_......... _................... ...... ..._..._-_-.._............. _........ _...... ..................... ..---.... .................................................. _.... ....... ...... --...... _ - Rear Drum Diam x Width N/A Fuel Tank Fuel Tank Capacity, Approx 36 gal. — - Aux Fuel Tank Capacity, Approx _..__........ _ ...._-...-.. _— N/A _ _.._..._.._......._ _..._............ -..---_-..... __............ ..................... ................ _..... ...... ...... _............ Fuel Tank Location ............. _... _.. ._........-_-....... -............. .. N/A ..... ..... Aux Fuel Tank Location N/A Interior plimensior _...__..-......__...... _.__........... .... ...._.._..__.. _-. _.._.........---- .._.._..._.._.- .._T.._ .............. _....... ..........._.........._.._... ---- Passenger Capacity ..... ........ __...................................... _._._...---............ 3 -_..-..----------- _—..__.._................._ ..... --------- Front Head Room .... .._......................... ........... .. _ _.._.._-_................... 43.11 in _............_..----_-__ ._..-..---- .._.. .__....... _ _ ...... _........... _........ --........................... _........... Front Leg Room _....................... _.......... ................ .._._........._.. 44.53 in _............ _... From Shoulder Room 66.06 In Front Hip Room 60.9 in Second Head Room — _._..._._.........._ -- __-__-......_...._ _..__.. N/A - ...-......_......_._�.__ --_...__ .......... ____ ... _..._... ................. ............................. ..... ...—.... __._..__ Second Leg Room _ ............. ...--...................... -..__.._.__.....-......... N/A .......... ............ ..................... _....... --- ..... ............ ... .... --------- -------- co Send Shoulder Room ...... WA ... _.... _..... .-.__..._........... _.-_p _ ............ __..................... ..................... .......... _............ ................ Second Hi Room ................ N/A Exterior Dimensions .............. --._..... .._ ......... -............ _...... __..... _............ _-_......_--... --_-.. __ .....---..__........................................... Wheelbase ----... .......... ...._....._.............. 141.55 in _ ._. ......... _..-.....-..-- -- ---_—__..._. _ Length, Overall w/o rear bumper _ _ N/A _... __........... --.... - ._.-........... _.............................. _._................ ----...................... Length, Overall w/rear bumper ....._............... _...... _...... _......... _........... ................... N/A _.._— -- w _ _ _ _.._... _-_......... Length, Overall -.... _......... ......... 235.59 in Width, Max w/o mirrors 81.75 in Height, Overall .... _.... _..... - _ 79.94 in __ ...� .�_ ._....----.........._. __..._.._......_._..................... ....__............_........_......__._.........................._.._......------ Overhang, Front ...... _.._.................... ....__..— N/A - - _.._......_.___-__-_-__._._.__...._,- Overhang, Rear w/o bumper _..__..... _........ ._............ ...... __— WA_ ._..... _......... _.._.._.......... ._._............. _........ _..__.. ....._..._... ........ _.......................... .-_-......_................ _......... _.......................... Front Bumper to Back of Cab _.............. ._... .......... _....... ................... ...... ... ........... _.._..._.... N/A _ w__.._............._... ........ :Cab to Axle 55.24 in R Cab to End of Frame _ N/A - Ground to Top of Load Floor N/A .............. ......... -......... . ------ ..... .... __............. .....-._._:.___._............ ..................................... ---.... _....... Ground to Top of Frame __............ _... ...__.......... ..................... _..--.._....... N/A ._._.._._.._-:_..._._......__......._.. ...-..-_- Frame Width, Rear ......__._............._...........-._._...- -....� ------- N/A _.._.._.._._........... -..._.._..._.__._..._...... _.._........ .... .---__ ....................................... -........ _... _..-............... __... ....... ............................................... Ground Clearance, Front __................. ..._...... _...................... .......... ..... ........ _...._.._....... 10.19 in ------ _...._.._.....---_..._.... .­ Ground Clearance, Rear 10.19 in Body Length 0.00 It _ Cab to Body - N/A Cargo Area Dimensions _..--..._...._....... .-_._.._ _..�...._ _...........- -- __ ._.. - ... _ ............ -.... _.._.................. _................... Cargo Box Length C Floor .........._._.. _. _ .... ......._._. _............... N/A _- _......... _ .._._. �_ Cargo Box tIi[�dth C� Top, Rear _..... --- ......._ N/A _--._._.................. ........._.._........ ---_.. .............. _........... _....... .---.... - ........... ....... .- ........................................ _... .._............ Cargo Box Width Q Floor .................................................. _._ ............................ N/A _ ..... Cargo Box Width Wteelhoualinga N/A Cargo Box (Area) Height N/A Tailgate Width NIA This document contains information considered Confidential between GM and its Clients uniquely. The information provided is not intended for public disclosure. Prices, specifications, and availability are subject to change without notice, and do not include certain fees, taxes and charges that may be required by law or vary by manufacturer or region. Performance figures are guidelines only, and actual performance may vary. Photos may not represent actual vehicles or exact configurations. Content based on report preparer's input is subject to the accuracy of the input provided. Data Version: 26654. Data Updated: Oct 2, 2025 6:46:00 PM PDT. Oct 6, 2025 Page Alan Jay Fleet Ashlee Wilson -Dickman 1 863-402-4234 1 ashlee.wilson@alanjay.com _.._....... __..-.......... _...-........_.._...-.---....------- _-................................. ............... -... -... -----.._.._..__...._--- -...... ........... -._.­--___---................. _ _ —_ _.... - ...... - _ - - —___ �_._�............-.... -..... ._.---_............................. Vehicle: [Fleet] 2026 Chevrolet Silverado 250OHD (CC20903) 2WD Reg Cab 142" Work Truck (0 Complete ) Cargo Area Dimensions Cargo Volume ^ N/A Exfd Cab Cargo Volume N/A This document contains information considered Confidential between GM and its Clients uniquely. The information provided is not intended for public disclosure. Prices, specifications, and availability are subject to change without notice, and do not include certain fees, taxes and charges that may be required by law or vary by manufacturer or region. Performance figures are guidelines only, and actual performance may vary. Photos may not represent actual vehicles or exact configurations. Content based on report preparer's input is subject to the accuracy of the input provided. Data Version: 26654. Data Updated: Oct 2, 2025 6:46:00 PM PDT. Oct 6, 2025 Page 13 c, Indian River County, Florida * * MEMORANDUM �1pA �' G. Indian River County Administration Complex 1801 27th Street Vero Beach, Florida 32960 indianriver.gov File ID: 25-1080 Type: Consent Staff Report Meeting Date: 11/18/2025 TO: Board of County Commissioners THROUGH: John A. Titkanich, Jr., County Administrator Kylie Yanchula, Natural Resources Director FROM: Eric Charest, Assistant Director Natural Resources Department DATE: November 3, 2025 SUBJECT: Notice of Application for Indian River Lagoon National Estuary Program Grants for Various Projects BACKGROUND On September 12, 2025 the County received notification from the Indian River Lagoon Council that the Indian River Lagoon National Estuary Program (IRLNEP) is seeking grant proposals for its FY 2027 grant program. Grants for various project categories are available: (1) Water Quality Restoration Projects ($300,000 funding available); (2) Habitat Restoration Projects ($100,000 funding available); (3) Community -Based Restoration Projects ($75,000 funding available); and (4) Science and Innovation Projects ($150,000 funding available). ANALYSIS Multiple Departments within the County are currently evaluating projects and/or potential projects to determine their applicability for applying for the FY 2027 IRLNEP Cost -Share grants. Cost Share percentages under the IRLNEP Grants range from a requirement of a 25% to 50% matching County funds depending on the grant category. Local funding for the matching requirement will be determined by each County Department based on the project grant application being submitted. The purpose of this agenda item is to request approval from the County Commission for various Departments within the County to apply for applicable grants under the current IRLNEP grant solicitation. The main purpose of the IRLNEP grants is to fund projects that will improve the health of the Indian River Lagoon. 2027 Grant Proposal Schedule September 12, 2025 - IRLNEP Grant Proposal Notification December 12, 2025 - Proposals due If awarded, the grant agreement(s) will be presented to the Board for final funding approval and grant execution. BUDGETARY IMPACT Indian River County, Florida Page 1 of 2 Printed on 11/13/2025 pow let by LegistarTM Estimated costs for these projects are in development. Local match requirements for the grants vary from 25% to 50% percent of the project cost and will be identified by the respective Department during the application process in consultation with the Office of Management and Budget. If awarded, the grant agreement(s) will be presented to the Board of County Commissioners for final funding approval and grant execution. PREVIOUS BOARD ACTIONS Prior year grant awards from the IRLNEP have been brought before the Board for approval. POTENTIAL FUTURE BOARD ACTIONS If awarded a grant under the FY 2027 IRLNEP Grant solicitation, the respective Department will bring the grant award to the Board for consideration and approval. STRATEGIC PLAN ALIGNMENT Environment STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff requests authorization to submit grant application packages to the IRLNEP for applicable projects as determined by the respective Departments. Staff also requests the Board authorize the respective Department Director the ability to sign the grant applications after review by the County Attorney's office for legal sufficiency, if required, with the understanding that any award of grants would come before the Board for final approval. Indian River County, Florida Page 2 of 2 Printed on 11/13/2025 powc ettryLegistarT� Indian River County, Florida * * MEMORANDUM �IpA File ID: 25-1081 Type: Consent Staff Report TO: Indian River County Board of County Commissioners THROUGH: John A. Titkanich, Jr., County Administrator Sean C. Lieske, Director of Utility Services Howard G. Richards, PE, Manager - Capital Projects FROM: Paola Talavera, Associate Engineer DATE: October 28, 2025 91( , Indian River County Administration Complex 1801 27th Street Vero Beach, Florida 32960 indianriver.gov Meeting Date: 11/18/2025 SUBJECT: Award of Bid 2025067 for Gifford Water Tank Structural Rehabilitation Phase 2. IRCDUS Project ID 13.23.538 BACKGROUND Indian River County Department of Utility Services (IRCDUS) owns and operates the Gifford Elevated Storage Tank (EST), a 0.4 million -gallon (MG) steel multi -leg supported tank that has a common inlettoutlet pipe, and an altitude valve. The tank is not required to meet Florida Administrative Code (FAC) requirements for potable water storage, it has been isolated from the water distribution systems and is no longer in operational use. To ensure structural integrity of the tank, modification/upgrade of the tank is required. On behalf of the Indian River County Department of Utility Services (IRCDUS), sealed bids were solicited from qualified contractors for the Gifford Water Tank Structural Rehabilitation Phase 2 project. Phase 2 includes sand -blasting and re -coating of the entire exterior structure of the 400,000 -gallon multi -leg steel elevated potable water storage tank located in Gifford. Phase 1 of the structural improvements was awarded to, and successfully completed by, Viking Painting, LLC, (Viking) between December 2024 and June 2025. During the solicitation process for Phase 1, the Department determined that awarding Phase 2 was not feasible at the time, as there are antennas on the tank that have to be removed in coordination with their respective vendors. BID RESULTS Advertising Date: August 24, 2025 Bid Opening Date: October 3, 2025 Euna Bonfire notified: 348 Subscribers Bid Documents Obtained by: 18 Contractors Replies: 2 Contractors Firm ocation Total Bid Viking Painting, LLC aVista, NE $398,250 Indian River County, Florida Page 1 of 2 Printed on 11/13/2025 powe11 l_egistar azorback, LLC ITarpon Springs, FL J$673,000 ANALYSIS The design engineer, Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. (KHA), reviewed the bids and has recommended award to Viking as the lowest, responsive, responsible bidder. The provided base bid was approximately 24% less than the engineer's opinion of probable cost. The contractor has successfully completed several projects for IRCDUS, including Phase 1 of this project. Staff concurs with KHA's recommendation of award to Viking for the amount of $398,250. Due to the potential for scope variability (i.e., known risks) or owner -directed changes (e.g., value engineering), staff propose an additional 15% or $60,000 in project reserve to cover such additional expenses. These additional expenses may become necessary to complete the project (resolve issues) or meet departmental objectives (explore opportunities). The project reserve will be managed by IRCDUS' Capital Projects Manager for the sole purpose of covering such costs over and above the contractor's bid price. With the proposed project reserve included, the proposed budget for the Project is $458,250. BUDGETARY IMPACT Funds, in the amount of $458,250, for the work will come from the Utilities/WIP/Gifford Storage Tank account, number 471-169000-23538. Since this is an operating capital project, the funds will come from fund balance. Operating funds are derived from water and sewer sales. PREVIOUS BOARD ACTIONS Request Approval to Bid Gifford Elevated Storage Tank Rehabilitation IRCDUS Project ID 13.23.538 Award of Bid 2024047 for Gifford Elevated Storage Tank Modification and Rehabilitation Phase 1 (IRCDUS 13.23.538) STRATEGIC PLAN ALIGNMENT Infrastructure: Planning, constructing, managing, and maintaining critical public infrastructure in response to our current needs, future demands, and the expectations of our community; embracing innovation, technology, and resiliency. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends the Board award Bid 2025067 to Viking Painting, LLC for Gifford Water Tank Structural Rehabilitation Phase 2 for $398,250, approve the Agreement, and authorize the Chairman to sign the agreement after it has been approved by the County Attorney as to form and legal sufficiency, and after receipt and approval of the required public construction bond. Staff also request authorization to hold $60,000 in project reserve for potential changes due to scope variability or owner directed changes for a total budget of $458,250. So long as there are no increases to the budget dollar amount approved, upon adequate completion of the work, staff is directed to make final payment and release any retainage to Viking Painting, LLC. Indian River County, Florida Page 2 of 2 Printed on 11/13/2025 POWTtgy Legistarn" SECTION 00520 Agreement THIS AGREEMENT is by and between INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, a Political Subdivision of the State of Florida organized and existing under the Laws of the State of Florida, (hereinafter called OWNER) and (hereinafter called CONTRACTOR). OWNER and CONTRACTOR, in consideration of the mutual covenants hereinafter set forth, agree as follows: ARTICLE 1 -WORK 1.01 CONTRACTOR shall complete all Work as specified or indicated in the Contract Documents. The Work is generally described as follows: The proposed project consists of work necessary to rehabilitate the 400,000 -gallon multi -leg steel elevated potable water storage tank located in Indian River County, Florida, including the coating of new metalwork and hardware, removal of damaged or corroded paint and re -coating and all accessory items to provide a complete and structurally sound system as outlined in these documents. ARTICLE 2 - THE PROJECT 2.01 The Project for which the Work under the Contract Documents may be the whole or only a part is generally described as follows: Project Name: Gifford Water Tank Structural Rehabilitation Phase 2 County Project Number: IRC -13.23.538 Bid Number: 2025067 Project Address: 4680 28th Ct, Vero Beach, FL, 32967 ARTICLE 3 - ENGINEER 3.01 The Indian River County Public Works Department is hereinafter called the ENGINEER and will act as OWNER's representative, assume all duties and responsibilities, and have the rights and authority assigned to ENGINEER in the Contract Documents in connection with the completion of the Work in accordance with the Contract Documents. ARTICLE 4 - CONTRACT TIMES 4.01 Time of the Essence A. All time limits for Milestones, if any, Substantial Completion, and completion and readiness for final payment as stated in the Contract Documents are of the essence of the Contract. 4.02 Days to Achieve Substantial Completion, Final Completion and Final Payment A. The Work will be substantially completed on or before the 60th calendar day after the date when the Contract Times commence to run as provided in paragraph 2.03 of the General Conditions, and completed and ready for final payment in accordance with paragraph 14.07 of the General Conditions on or before the 90th calendar day after the date when the Contract Times commence to run. Agreement - 00-444 4.03 Liquidated Damages A. CONTRACTOR and OWNER recognize that time is of the essence of this Agreement and that OWNER will suffer financial loss if the Work is not completed within the times specified in paragraph 4.02 above, plus any extensions thereof allowed in accordance with Article 12 of the General Conditions. Liquidated damages will commence for this portion of work. The parties also recognize the delays, expense, and difficulties involved in proving in a legal proceeding the actual loss suffered by OWNER if the Work is not completed on time. Accordingly, instead of requiring any such proof, OWNER and CONTRACTOR agree that as liquidated damages for delay (but not as a penalty), CONTRACTOR shall pay OWNER 750.00 for each calendar day that expires after the time specified in paragraph 4.02 for Substantial Completion until the Work is substantially complete. After Substantial Completion, if CONTRACTOR shall neglect, refuse, or fail to complete the remaining Work within the Contract Time or any proper extension thereof granted by OWNER, CONTRACTOR shall pay OWNER $750.00 for each calendar day that expires after the time specified in paragraph 4.02 for completion and readiness for final payment until the Work is completed and ready for final payment. ARTICLE 5 - CONTRACT PRICE 5.01 OWNER shall pay CONTRACTOR for completion of the Work in accordance with the Contract Documents, an amount in current funds equal to the sum of the amounts determined pursuant to paragraph 5.01.A and summarized in paragraph 5.01.13, below: A. For all Work, at the prices stated in CONTRACTOR's Bid, attached hereto as an exhibit. B. THE CONTRACT SUM subject to additions and deductions provided in the Contract: Numerical Amount: $ Written Amount: ARTICLE 6 - PAYMENT PROCEDURES 6.01 Submittal and Processing of Payments A. CONTRACTOR shall submit Applications for Payment in accordance with Article 14 of the General Conditions. Applications for Payment will be processed by ENGINEER as provided in the General Conditions and the Contract Documents. 6.02 Progress Payments. A. The OWNER shall make progress payments to the CONTRACTOR on the basis of the approved partial payment request as recommended by ENGINEER in accordance with the provisions of the Local Government Prompt Payment Act, Florida Statutes section 218.70 et. seq. The OWNER shall retain five percent (5%) of the payment amounts due to the CONTRACTOR until substantial completion of all work to be performed by CONTRACTOR under the Contract Documents. Agreement - 00-11-5 B. For construction projects less than $10 million, at the time the OWNER is in receipt of the Certificate of Substantial Completion, the OWNER shall have 30 calendar days to provide a list to the CONTRACTOR of items to be completed and the estimated cost to complete each item on the list. OWNER and CONTRACTOR agree that the CONTRACTOR'S itemized bid shall serve as the basis for determining the cost of each item on the list. For projects in excess of $10 million, OWNER shall have up to 45 calendar days following receipt of Certificate of Substantial Completion of the project to provide CONTRACTOR with said list. C. Payment of Retainage - Within 20 business days following the creation of the list, OWNER shall pay CONTRACTOR the remaining contract balance including all retainage previously withheld by OWNER except for an amount equal to 150% of the estimated cost to complete all of the items on the list. Upon completion of all items on the list, the CONTRACTOR may submit a payment request for the amount of the 150% retainage held by the OWNER. If a good faith dispute exists as to whether one or more of the items have been finished, the OWNER may continue to withhold the 150% of the total cost to complete such items. The OWNER shall provide CONTRACTOR written reasons for disputing completion of the list. 6.03 Pay Requests. A. Each request for a progress payment shall be submitted on the application provided by OWNER and the application for payment shall contain the CONTRACTOR'S certification. All progress payments will be on the basis of progress of the work measured by the schedule of values established, or in the case of unit price work based on the number of units completed. 6.04 Paragraphs 6.02 and 6.03 do not apply to construction services work purchased by the County as OWNER which are paid for, in whole or in part, with federal funds and are subject to federal grantor laws and regulations or requirements that are contrary to any provision of the Local Government Prompt Payment Act. In such event, payment and retainage provisions shall be governed by the applicable grant requirements and guidelines. 6.05 Acceptance of Final Payment as Release. A. The acceptance by the CONTRACTOR of final payment shall be and shall operate as a release to the OWNER from all claims and all liability to the CONTRACTOR other than claims in stated amounts as may be specifically excepted by the CONTRACTOR for all things done or furnished in connection with the work under this Contract and for every act and neglect of the OWNER and others relating to or arising out of the work. Any payment, however, final or otherwise, shall not release the CONTRACTOR or its sureties from any obligations under the Contract Documents or the Public Construction Bond. ARTICLE 7 - INDEMNIFICATION 7.01 CONTRACTOR shall indemnify OWNER, ENGINEER, and others in accordance with paragraph 6.20 (Indemnification) of the General Conditions to the Construction Contract. Agreement - 00+1.6 ARTICLE 8 - CONTRACTOR'S REPRESENTATIONS 8.01 In order to induce OWNER to enter into this Agreement CONTRACTOR makes the following representations: A. CONTRACTOR has examined and carefully studied the Contract Documents and the other related data identified in the Bidding Documents. B. CONTRACTOR has visited the Site and become familiar with and is satisfied as to the general, local, and Site conditions that may affect cost, progress, and performance of the Work. C. CONTRACTOR is familiar with and is satisfied as to all federal, state, and local Laws and Regulations that may affect cost, progress, and performance of the Work. D. CONTRACTOR has carefully studied all: (1) reports of explorations and tests of subsurface conditions at or contiguous to the Site and all drawings of physical conditions in or relating to existing surface or subsurface structures at or contiguous to the Site (except Underground Facilities) which have been identified in the Supplementary Conditions as provided in paragraph 4.02 of the General Conditions and (2) reports and drawings of a Hazardous Environmental Condition, if any, at the Site which have been identified in the Supplementary Conditions as provided in paragraph 4.06 of the General Conditions. E. CONTRACTOR has obtained and carefully studied (or assumes responsibility for having done so) all additional or supplementary examinations, investigations, explorations, tests, studies, and data concerning conditions (surface, subsurface, and Underground Facilities) at or contiguous to the Site which may affect cost, progress, or performance of the Work or which relate to any aspect of the means, methods, techniques, sequences, and procedures of construction to be employed by CONTRACTOR, including applying the specific means, methods, techniques, sequences, and procedures of construction, if any, expressly required by the Contract Documents to be employed by CONTRACTOR, and safety precautions and programs incident thereto F. CONTRACTOR does not consider that any further examinations, investigations, explorations, tests, studies, or data are necessary for the performance of the Work at the Contract Price, within the Contract Times, and in accordance with the other terms and conditions of the Contract Documents. G. CONTRACTOR is aware of the general nature of work to be performed by OWNER and others at the Site that relates to the Work as indicated in the Contract Documents. H. CONTRACTOR has correlated the information known to CONTRACTOR, information and observations obtained from visits to the Site, reports and drawings identified in the Contract Documents, and all additional examinations, investigations, explorations, tests, studies, and data with the Contract Documents. I. CONTRACTOR has given ENGINEER written notice of all conflicts, errors, ambiguities, or discrepancies that CONTRACTOR has discovered in the Contract Documents, and the written resolution thereof by ENGINEER is acceptable to CONTRACTOR. J. The Contract Documents are generally sufficient to indicate and convey understanding of all terms and conditions for performance and furnishing of the Work. K. CONTRACTOR is registered with and will use the Department of un Security's E -Verify system (www.e-verify.gov) to confirm the employment eligibility of all newly hired employees Agreement - 00514-7 for the duration of this agreement, as required by Section 448.095, F.S. CONTRACTOR is also responsible for obtaining an affidavit from all subcontractors, as required in Section 448.095(5)(b), F.S., stating the subcontractor does not employ, contract with, or subcontract with an unauthorized alien. ARTICLE 9 - CONTRACT DOCUMENTS 9.01 Contents A. The Contract Documents consist of the following: 1. This Agreement (pages 00520-1 to 0052M, inclusive); 2. Notice to Proceed (page 00550-1); 3. Public Construction Bond (pages 00610-1 to 00610-3, inclusive); 4. Sample Certificate of Liability Insurance (page 00620-1 ; 5. Contractor's Application for Payment (pages 00622-1 to 00622-6 inclusive); 6. Certificate of Substantial Completion (pages 00630-1 to 00630-2, inclusive); 7. Contractor's Final Certification of the Work (pages 00632-1 to 00632-2, inclusive); 8. Professional Surveyor & Mapper's Certification as to Elevations and Locations of the Work (page 00634-1): 9. General Conditions (pages 00700-1 to 00700-38, inclusive); 10. Supplementary Conditions (pages 00800-1 to 0080 inclusive); 11. Specifications as provided in Appendix B. 12. Drawings consisting of a title sheet (T-1), and sheets numbered N-1, N-2 and S-1, with each sheet bearing the following project information: "Gifford WT Water Tank Rehabilitation (phase 2)"; 13. Addenda (if applicable ); 14. Appendices to this Agreement (enumerated as follows): Appendix A — Plans Appendix B — Technical Specifications Appendix C — Structural Analysis 15. CONTRACTOR'S BID (pages 00310-1 to 003100, inclusive); 16. Bid Bond (page 00430-1 17. Sworn Statement Under Section 105.08, Indian River County Code, on Disclosure of Relationships (pages 00452-1 to 00452-2, inclusive); Agreement - 00545 18. Qualifications Questionnaire (page 00456-1 to 00456-2, inclusive); 19. List of Subcontractors (page 00458-1); 20. Certification Regarding Prohibition Against Contracting with Scrutinized Companies (page 00460-1); 21. Anti -Human Trafficking Affidavit (page 00462-1); 22. The following which may be delivered or issued on or after the Effective Date of the Agreement and are not attached hereto: a) Written Amendments; b) Work Change Directives; c) Change Order(s); ARTICLE 10 - MISCELLANEOUS 10.01 Terms A. Terms used in this Agreement will have the meanings indicated in the General Conditions. 10.02 Assignment of Contract A. No assignment by a parry hereto of any rights under or interests in the Contract will be binding on another party hereto without the written consent of the party sought to be bound; and, specifically but without limitation, moneys that may become due and moneys that are due may not be assigned without such consent (except to the extent that the effect of this restriction may be limited by law), and unless specifically stated to the contrary in any written consent to an assignment, no assignment will release or discharge the assignor from any duty or responsibility under the Contract Documents. 10.03 Successors and Assigns A. OWNER and CONTRACTOR each binds itself, its partners, successors, assigns, and legal representatives to the other party hereto, its partners, successors, assigns, and legal representatives in respect to all covenants, agreements, and obligations contained in the Contract Documents. 10.04 Severability A. Any provision or part of the Contract Documents held to be void or unenforceable under any Law or Regulation shall be deemed stricken, and all remaining provisions shall continue to be valid and binding upon OWNER and CONTRACTOR, who agree that the Contract Documents shall be reformed to replace such stricken provision or part thereof with a valid and enforceable provision that comes as close as possible to expressing the intention of the stricken provision. 10.05 Venue Agreement - 00540-9 A. This Contract shall be governed by the laws of the State of Florida. Venue for any lawsuit brought by either party against the other party or otherwise arising out of this Contract shall be in Indian River County, Florida, or, in the event of a federal jurisdiction, in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida. 10.06 Public Records Compliance A. Indian River County is a public agency subject to Chapter 119, Florida Statutes. The CONTRACTOR shall comply with Florida's Public Records Law. Specifically, the CONTRACTOR shall: (1) Keep and maintain public records required by the County to perform the service. (2) Upon request from the County's Custodian of Public Records, provide the County with a copy of the requested records or allow the records to be inspected or copied within a reasonable time at a cost that does not exceed the cost provided in Chapter 119 or as otherwise provided by law. (3) Ensure that public records that are exempt or confidential and exempt from public records disclosure requirements are not disclosed except as authorized by law for the duration of the contract term and following completion of the contract if the contractor does not transfer the records to the County. (4) Upon completion of the contract, transfer, at no cost, to the County all public records in possession of the CONTRACTOR or keep and maintain public records required by the County to perform the service. If the CONTRACTOR transfers all public records to the County upon completion of the contract, the CONTRACTOR shall destroy any duplicate public records that are exempt or confidential and exempt from public records disclosure requirements. If the CONTRACTOR keeps and maintains public records upon completion of the contract, the CONTRACTOR shall meet all applicable requirements for retaining public records. All records stored electronically must be provided to the County, upon request from the Custodian of Public Records, in a format that is compatible with the information technology systems of the County. B. IF THE CONTRACTOR HAS QUESTIONS REGARDING THE APPLICATION OF CHAPTER 119, FLORIDA STATUTES, TO THE CONTRACTOR'S DUTY TO PROVIDE PUBLIC RECORDS RELATING TO THIS CONTRACT, CONTACT THE CUSTODIAN OF PUBLIC RECORDS AT: (772) 226-1424 publicrecords(&-indianriver.gov Indian River County Office of the County Attorney 180127 th Street Vero Beach, FL 32960 B. Failure of the Contractor to comply with these requirements shall be a material breach of this Agreement. Agreement - 00-12-0 ARTICLE 11 —TERMINATION 11.01 OWNER may terminate this Contract if CONTRACTOR, including all wholly owned subsidiaries, majority-owned subsidiaries, and parent companies, that exist for the purpose of making profit, is found to have been placed on the Scrutinized Companies that Boycott Israel List or is engaged in a boycott of Israel as set forth in section 215.4725, Florida Statutes. OWNER may terminate this Contract if CONTRACTOR is found to have submitted a false certification as provided under section 287.135(5), Florida Statutes, been placed on the Scrutinized Companies with Activities in Sudan List or the Scrutinized Companies with Activities in the Iran Petroleum Energy Sector List, or been engaged in business operations in Cuba or Syria, as defined by section 287.135, Florida Statutes. 11.02 The obligations of the COUNTY under this Agreement are subject to the availability of funds lawfully appropriated for its purpose by the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County. 11.03 A vendor or service provider that breaches this agreement during an emergency recovery period (1 -year period that begins on the date that the governor initially declared a state of emergency for a natural emergency) is to pay a $5,000 penalty and damages which may be either actual and consequential damages or liquidated damages. Additionally, the CONTRACTOR shall be liable for: (1) any new cost incurred by the COUNTY in soliciting bids or proposals for and letting a new contract; and (2) the difference between the cost of completing the new contract and the cost of completing this Contract; (3) any court costs and attorney's fees associated with any lawsuit undertaken by COUNTY to enforce its rights herein. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, OWNER and CONTRACTOR have signed this Agreement in duplicate. One counterpart each has been delivered to OWNER and CONTRACTOR. All portions of the Contract Documents have been signed or identified by OWNER and CONTRACTOR or on their behalf. This Agreement will be effective on day of 20 OWNER: Deputy Clerk (SEAL) INDIAN RIVER COUNTY By: Joseph E. Flescher, Chairman By: John A. Titkanich, Jr., County Administrator APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGAL SUFFICIENCY: By: Jennifer W. Shuler, County Attorney Ryan L. Butler, Clerk of Court and Comptroller Attest: Designated Representative: Name, title address phone email Agreement - 00512-f CONTRACTOR: COMPANY NAME By: Name: Title: (Corporate Seal) (If CONTRACTOR is a corporation or partnership, attach evidence of authority to sign) Attest: Name: Title: Designated Representative: Name: Title: Address: Phone: * * END OF SECTION * * Agreement - 00512-2 Indian River County, Florida MEMORANDUM File ID: 25-1083 Type: Consent Staff Report TO: Indian River County Board of County Commissioners THROUGH: John A. Titkanich, Jr., County Administrator Sean C. Lieske, Director of Utility Services Howard G. Richards, PE, Manager, Capital Projects FROM: Paola Talavera, EI, Associate Engineer DATE: October 31, 2025 91, Indian River County Administration Complex 1801 27th Street Vero Beach, Florida 32960 indianriver.gov Meeting Date: 11/18/2025 SUBJECT: AtkinsRealis Work Order No. 10 for Sebastian Septic to Sewer Conversion Feasibility Study, IRCDUS Project ID 21.26.502 BACKGROUND Over the past decade, public awareness of the need to improve the water quality of the Indian River Basin has grown significantly. This has led to increasing regulatory pressure on utilities to reduce pollution and improve the quality of discharges into the Lagoon. One major initiative is the recently established Indian River Lagoon Protection Program (Florida State Statute 373.469). Under this statute, all existing conventional septic systems in the Indian River Lagoon Basin are required to either connect to sewer systems or upgrade to enhanced nutrient -reducing onsite sewage treatment and disposal systems by July 1, 2030. The Indian River County Department of Utility Services (IRCDUS) is undertaking a multi -phase Septic to Sewer (S2S) Program to convert residential and commercial properties on septic systems to the IRCDUS sewer network. Septic to sewer conversions are necessary to limit the amount of nutrients, particularly nitrogen and phosphorus, released into the ground by septic systems, which can contaminate groundwater and nearby water bodies. In the City of Sebastian, Phase III of North Sebastian S2S conversions are currently underway, with Phase I and II having been completed in April 2019 and June 2023 respectively. The North Sebastian area encompasses an area generally described as having a western limit of US Highway 1, an eastern limit of the Indian River Lagoon, a Northern Limit of Indian River Drive connection to US Highway 1, and the Southern Limit as Main Street. To date, approximately 154 sewer connections have been completed. IRCDUS will need to evaluate the options for continuing conversions in the City of Sebastian. ANALYSIS In September 2025, IRCDUS selected AtkinsRealis to provide a comprehensive study to evaluate whether the existing infrastructure including lift stations, gravity sewers, and force mains can accommodate the increased Indian River County, Florida Page 1 of 2 Printed on 11/13/2025 Howe al_* t_egistar" wastewater flow resulting from the transitions. AtkinsR6alis was selected due to previous experience performing an equivalent Feasibility Study in the City of Miami. Upon request by IRCDUS staff, AtkinsR6alis provided the attached Work Order 10 (WO 10), pursuant to the Continuing Contract Agreement, dated May 2, 2023, to perform engineering professional services associated with the Sebastian Septic to Sewer Conversion Feasibility Study in the amount is $288,132. AtkinsR6alis will provide professional services to include project management and engineering services. AtkinsR6alis will analyze the existing infrastructure for capacity and potential improvements and develop a plan for proper sizing of any new portions of the sewer collection system. Additionally, a feasibility level estimate representing the anticipated construction bid amounts will be developed. BUDGETARY IMPACT Funds, in the amount of $288,132, for this project are derived from the Utilities/ Gen & Eng/Other Prof/Sebastian S2S Conv Feas Study account, number 47123536-033190-26502, in the Utilities operating fund. The Utilities operating fund budget is derived from water and sewer revenues. STRATEGIC PLAN ALIGNMENT Infrastructure: Planning, constructing, managing, and maintaining critical public infrastructure in response to our current needs, future demands, and the expectations of our community; embracing innovation, technology, and resiliency. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Indian River County Board of County Commissioners approve Work Order 10 to AtkinsR6alis to provide professional services for the Sebastian Septic to Sewer Conversion Feasibility Study project, Project ID 21.26.502, in the amount of $288,132, and authorize the Chair to execute the same. So long as there are no changes in the dollar amount under the amount approved, upon adequate completion of the work set forth in the work order, staff is directed to make final payments to AtkinsR6alis. Indian River County, Florida Page 2 of 2 Printed on 11/13/2025 P()WYU legistarT ENGINEERING SERVICES WORK ORDER 10 This Work Order Number _10_ is entered into as of this _ day of pursuant to that certain Continuing Contract Agreement, dated May 2, 2023, ("Agreement"), by and between INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Florida ("COUNTY") and Atkins North America, Inc. ("Consultant"). The COUNTY has selected the Consultant to perform the professional services set forth on Exhibit A (Scope of Work), attached to this Work Order and made part hereof by this reference. The professional services will be performed by the Consultant for the mutually agreed upon lump sum or maximum amount not -to -exceed professional fee. Any additional costs must be approved in writing, and at a rate not to exceed the prices set forth in Exhibit B of the Agreement (Rate Schedule) for RFQ 2023015, made a part hereof by this reference. The Consultant will perform the professional services within the timeframe more particularly set forth in Exhibit A (Time Schedule), attached to this Work Order and made a part hereof by this reference all in accordance with the terms and provisions set forth in the Agreement. Pursuant to paragraph 1.4 of the Agreement, nothing contained in any Work Order shall conflict with the terms of the Agreement and the terms of the Agreement shall be deemed to be incorporated in each individual Work Order as if fully set forth herein. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Work Order as of the date first written above. CONSULTANT: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY: By: Name: By: Title: , Chairman BCC Approval Date: By: John A. Titkanich, Jr., County Administrator Approved as to Form and Legal Sufficiency: By: Christopher A. Hicks, Assistant County Attorney Ryan L. Butler, Clerk of Court and Comptroller Attest: Deputy Clerk (SEAL) 125 Exhibit B Cost Detail Work Order No. 10 0"AtkinsRealis INDIAN RIVER COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF UTILITIES SERVICES CITY OF SEBASTIAN BUILDOUT OF SEPTIC TO SEWER CONVERSION FEASIBILITY STUDY IRCDUS PID 21.26.502 OCTOBER 15, 2025 EXHIBIT A — SCOPE OF SERVICES BACKGROUND Over the past decade, public awareness of the need to improve the water quality of the Indian River Basin has grown significantly. This has led to increasing regulatory pressure on utilities to reduce pollution and improve the quality of discharges into the Lagoon. One major initiative is the recently established Indian River Lagoon Protection Program (Florida State Statute 373.469). Under this statute, all existing conventional septic systems in the Indian River Lagoon Basin are required to either connect to sewer systems or upgrade to enhanced nutrient -reducing onsite sewage treatment and disposal systems by July 1, 2030. Fortunately, Indian River County Department of Utilities Services (IRCDUS) has been ahead of the curve in proactively expanding sewer collection systems throughout their service area, including customers currently relying on onsite sewage treatment and disposal (septic) systems. In September 2025, IRCDUS engaged AtkinsRealis to provide technical services for their current phase of septic to sewer conversions in the City of Sebastian. Septic to sewer conversions are necessary to limit the amount of nutrients, particularly nitrogen and phosphorus, released into the ground by septic systems, which can contaminate groundwater and nearby water bodies. In areas with porous soil, septic systems often fail to adequately filter these nutrients, leading to environmental issues such as harmful algal blooms and health risks from polluted drinking water. The proposed sewer systems, by contrast, will transport wastewater to a centralized treatment plant that more effectively removes nutrients, protecting ecosystems and public health while offering greater resilience during storms and floods To support this effort, a comprehensive study will be conducted to evaluate whether the existing infrastructure including lift stations, gravity sewers, and force mains can accommodate the increased wastewater flow resulting from the transitions. City of Sebastian Buildout of Septic to Sewer Conversion Feasibility Study Page 2 of 12 126 w: Exhibit B Cost Detail Work Order No. 10 TASK 01 Project Management CrAtkinsRealis Task 01 consists of the overall management of the project to completion. This includes contract administration, management of the project action list, schedule, budget, and ensuring that all team members understand their roles and responsibilities. The project manager will facilitate effective communication with City of Sebastian and IRCDUS representatives. Regular monitoring and reporting will be conducted to deliver the project on time, within budget, and to high quality standards. Project Status Reports will be supplied to IRCDUS with each invoice or upon request and will detail any changes in schedule along with supporting justification for the change. AtkinsRealis anticipates to attend four in-person Workshops with IRCDUS Staff to kick off the project, review collected data and proposed conversion areas, review the draft report comments, and review the final report. In addition, the AtkinsRealis team will facilitate up to eight bi-weekly progress meetings with the County, including scheduling, preparing agendas, and distributing meeting minutes. A site visit will be conducted on the same day as the Project Kickoff Workshop. Deliverables: Invoices, meeting and workshop coordination, site visit coordination, facilitation of meetings and workshops, meeting agendas and summaries TASK 02 Data Collection AtkinsRealis will perform the following subtasks as part of the Data Collection Task: • Review as -built information provided by the County or the County Master plan team • Review of County Standards, local codes, and regulatory requirements • Coordinate with the County's Hydraulic Modeler to acquire potable water demands • Coordinate with the City of Sebastian staff for the purpose of acquiring a list of planned annexations, developer projects under review or in progress incorporating the extension of sanitary sewer service, and septic systems that have been converted to advanced type • Coordinate with IRCDUS to obtain: o Existing and proposed distribution and collections systems in GIS format developed by the County Hydraulic Modeler o Available as-builts and record drawings (hard copies or GIS format) of utility information not yet incorporated into the finished hydraulic model o Subdivision, parcel data, and owner information in GIS o Active OSTDS within Sebastian City limits in GIS o Planned changes in land use in GIS o Flooding and storm surge areas in GIS o Proposed developments near Sebastian City limits incorporating sanitary sewer extensions in GIS AtkinsRealis will develop a comprehensive geodatabase to include the provided information that will serve as a basis for the feasibility study. The compiled geodatabase will be used to estimate City of Sebastian Buildout of Septic to Sewer Conversion Feasibility Study Page 4 of 12 128 Exhibit B r.1 AtkinsRealis Cost Detail Work Order No. 10 flows, develop tables, define limits of septic to sewer conversion areas, and develop schematic designs of the collection system. Deliverables: Compiled geodatabase of relative information, summary of permitting and regulatory requirements TASK 03 Define Flow Rates The conversion from septic to centralized sewer systems will increase sanitary flows, creating a need for infrastructure improvements. Proper sizing of the sewer collection system will ensure that the system is adequately sized to handle the projected flows, minimize risks of overflow and inefficiency, and provide for long-term sustainability and regulatory compliance. This task involves calculating the cumulative flows from each user, overall and by area, and then designing schematic sewer systems to convey those flows to the receiving facilities. Based on the information provided by the County and the Master Plan team AtkinsRealis will conduct a thorough assessment of the project area, including factors such as zoning, topography, flooding and storm surge that will impact the schematic design. AtkinsRealis will coordinate with County Staff, including the assigned project manager and GIS Manager, and with the County Hydraulic Modeler in relation to the Wastewater Master Plan under development to ensure the conversion areas and schematic design is consistent with proposed capital improvement projects. Deliverables: Projected flow rates and preliminary sewer network layout TASK 04 Hydraulic Modeling Coordination AtkinsRealis will coordinate with the County's assigned Hydraulic Modeler to evaluate the proposed schematic designs. This analysis will determine the feasibility of integrating the proposed improvements into the current wastewater system. AtkinsRealis will support the County's Hydraulic Modeler in implementation of the septic -to -sewer conversions, and review recommendations for changes in the schematic design. The County's Hydraulic Modeler may determine that improvements are needed in the existing collection system to accept the flows from the proposed septic to sewer conversion. Upon County acceptance, recommendations on improvements to the existing system from the County's Hydraulic Modeler will be incorporated into the schematic design. Areas will be evaluated for water service requirements where sanitary connections are to be provided. AtkinsRealis will coordinate with the County's Hydraulic Modeler who will provide water distribution extensions to these areas. The County's Hydraulic Modeler will provide this information in GIS format to be included with the compiled geodatabase and noted in the study. Deliverables: Summary of hydraulic model results and upgrades to the existing system. City of Sebastian Buildout of Septic to Sewer Conversion Feasibility Study Page 5 of 12 129 Exhibit B Cost Detail Work Order No. 10 TASK 05 Feasibility Report Draft Feasibility Report 01"Atkins136alis AtkinsRealis will prepare a Draft Feasibility Report which will consider key assumptions and design constraints, summarize the customer base, detail projected flow rates, and provide a schematic collection system design by area given with a unique identifier. The collection system design will include: • Gravity sewer mains and anticipated diameter • Force mains and anticipated diameter • Approximate locations of proposed sewer network • Approximate locations of public lift stations • Recommended improvements to existing infrastructure provided by the County's assigned Hydraulic Modeler • Connection points to existing sanitary sewer infrastructure as recommended by the County's Hydraulic Modeler A general and preliminary Project Schedule will be developed to outline the key areas of the initiative, including development of Construction Documents, Bid Phase, and Construction. This schedule is intended solely for planning purposes and is representative of all conversion areas. As the project progresses, the schedule will require updates to accommodate evolving project requirements, regulatory considerations, and coordination with key stakeholders. A feasibility level estimate representing the anticipated construction bid amounts will be developed for each conversion area using the most current information available. These cost estimates are intended to provide a preliminary understanding of the financial implications associated with the recommended collection system and serve as a foundational reference for further decision-making and budgeting. Upon submitting the electronic version of the Draft Feasibility Report, AtkinsRealis will schedule a workshop with County Staff and their Hydraulic Modeler to review the document and discuss their comments. Final Feasibility Report Following the Draft Feasibility Report Workshop, the report will be updated to address review comments. Final deliverables will include an electronic copy and twelve hard copies of the Final Report. An electronic version of the adjudicated review comments will be provided to the County PM for distribution. Upon submitting the electronic version of the Final Feasibility Report, AtkinsRealis will schedule a Workshop with County Staff to discuss attendance and presentations to be made with the Board of County Commissioners and City of Sebastian Council. Deliverables: Draft Feasibility Report, Workshop agenda and notes, Final Feasibility Report with adjudicated review comments. City of Sebastian Buildout of Septic to Sewer Conversion Feasibility Study Page 6 of 12 130 Exhibit B 0 AtkinsRealis Cost Detail Work Order No. 10 ASSUMPTIONS AND EXCLUSIONS The following assumptions have been made in the development of this scope of work, schedule, and fee: Subsurface utility engineering, geotechnical services, environmental assessments, and survey services are not required. 2. Neighborhood and community meetings are not anticipated or included. 3. Permitting is not required for this study. 4. The conceptual design will be based on the federal, state, and local codes and standards in effect at the start of the project. 5. IRCDUS will provide requested information and project reviews in a timely manner. 6. Attendees of the review meetings are designated as decision makers. 7. The County's Hydraulic Modeler will provide potable water demand patterns in the area and collaborate with AtkinsRealis on the determination of flow rates and proposed options for the anticipated collection system. 8. Any improvements to the existing collection system that are needed for acceptance of the additional flow from the conversion areas that have been or will be developed by the County's Hydraulic Modeler, will be communicated to AtkinsRealis and IRCDUS by the County's Hydraulic Modeler on completion of Task 03 according to the proposed schedule. The project schedule and feasibility level estimates are intended solely for planning purposes and exclude escalation factors over time intervals. 10. IRCDUS will contract separately with the Hydraulic Modeler. 11. The County PM will verify the availability of County Staff to attend meetings and workshops as well as provide timely requests for rescheduling as needed. Attendees of the review meetings are designated as decision makers. 12. Lift station and treatment facility design calculations are excluded. 13. Laterals to existing and proposed homes and developments will be included as a line item within the feasibility level estimate but excluded in schematic design. 14. Costs, schematic design, and evaluation of annexed areas and developer projects, both current and future are excluded. 15. This scope of work will not include priority phasing of conversion areas. 16. This scope excludes design, costs, and scheduling for water distribution to conversion areas requiring water service. It is assumed that water distribution to conversion areas is being evaluated in the County's Master Plan (in development at the time of this proposal). If available, the County's Hydraulic Modeler will provide this information to AtkinsRealis for incorporating with the feasibility study. City of Sebastian Buildout of Septic to Sewer Conversion Feasibility Study Page 7 of 12 131 Exhibit B Cost Detail Work Order No. 10 QUALITY CONTROL CrAtkinsRealis AtkinsRealis will be responsible for the professional quality of all deliverables. This includes an internal Quality Assurance Plan that, as a minimum, provides review of all deliverables and significant calculations by a qualified professional that was not responsible for project execution. SCHEDULE The anticipated schedule shown below is based on the number of weeks after the formal issuance of the signed Work Order and a Notice to Proceed by the County. Task No. Task Title Duration from NTP 01 Kick- Off Workshop 2 weeks 02 Data Collection 6 weeks 03 Define Flow Rates 10 weeks 04 Hydraulic Modeling Coordination 12 weeks 05 Draft Feasibility Report 20 weeks 05 Final Feasibility Report 30 weeks COMPENSATION The AtkinsRealis Team proposes to perform all services within this scope of work on a Lump Sum basis, with budgets between tasks and expenses being interchangeable. All invoices will include a detailed progress report in support of the invoice amount. The estimated total engineering fee including all labor and expenses associated with the scope of work is not to exceed $288,132.00, as presented below and detailed in Exhibit B. Task No. Task Title Fee 01 Project Management $ 44,980.00 02 Data Collection $ 16,624.00 03 Define Flow Rates $ 29,760.00 04 Hydraulic Modeling Coordination $ 29,600.00 05 Feasibility Report $ 161,168.00 EXP Expenses $ 6,000.00 Total $ 288,132.00 City of Sebastian Buildout of Septic to Sewer Conversion Feasibility Study Page 8 of 12 132 Exhibit B Cost Detail Work Order No. 10 EXHIBIT B Cost Detail City of Sebastian Buildout of Septic to Sewer Conversion Feasibility Study O�AtkinsRealis Page 9 of 12 133 i i N N M��N�NiN N N- I� ! a k Sj�1�ii8lR3i�� WHOM Ali I I t O i Q� - N £ ; j J6Ui G Nf 1-7 E 1 Jaaul8u3i 1 w� 4$idj�l �. RI f R O j �q 11 JaeuiBU3� or (2103) P---1 keoluyoeltti o t c; o j o. AI Jeoul6u3 •JSf g` leu0lssse;oJdi o; Isalu lee L ledl3ulJdl o�Ja6eueyy loafoJd vgr (n l G1 N� i LL cc C/) ma ` 90 0 A'1 0 O L)C C7 U) N t1i O ! R i s.: Ile _ o lE 0 c WU� UiS,g 8 aagi�:. c O N C O U N N U) O U 0- a) rn 0 M r-1 Exhibit C WAtkinsRealis Schedule Work Order No. 10 EXHIBIT C Schedule City of Sebastian Buildout of Septic to Sewer Conversion Feasibility Study Page 11 of 12 135 Exhibit C Schedule Work Order No. 10 SCHEDULE CrAtkinsR6alis The anticipated schedule shown below is based on the number of weeks after the formal issuance of the signed Work Order and a Notice to Proceed by the County. Task No. Task Title Duration from NTP 01 Kick- Off Workshop 2 weeks 02 Data Collection 6 weeks 03 Define Flow Rates 10 weeks 04 Hydraulic Modeling Coordination 12 weeks 05 Draft Feasibility Report 20 weeks 05 Final Feasibility Report 30 weeks City of Sebastian Buildout of Septic to Sewer Conversion Feasibility Study Page 12 of 12 136 Indian River County, Florida �IpA * MEMORANDUM 11 Indian River County Administration Complex 1801 27th Street Vero Beach, Florida 32960 indianriver.gov File ID: 25-1087 Type: Consent Staff Report Meeting Date: 11/18/2025 TO: Board of County Commissioners THROUGH: John A. Titkanich, Jr., County Administrator Nancy A. Bunt, Assistant County Administrator FROM: Adam Heltemes, P.E., Roadway Production Manager DATE: November 1, 2025 SUBJECT: Aviation Boulevard Extension (33rd Street to 36th Street) Corridor Study / S.C.A.L.E. Report] (IRC -1761) BACKGROUND The Aviation Boulevard Extension project is identified in the 2024 MPO Prioritized Needs List and the Updated 2030 Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP). Based on current traffic volumes and projected growth, the Indian River County Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) has recognized the need to extend Aviation Boulevard east of U.S. Highway 1 to 41 st Street within the 2045 LRTP. Currently, 37th Street operates at 66 and 75% of bidirectional capacity, while U.S. 1 operates at 61 and 74% of bidirectional capacity. The proposed extension is expected to relieve congestion by providing a more direct northern and eastern connection to the hospital and surrounding medical offices. Please note: Due to the size of the study, it is not included as part of the printed agenda. It can be viewed online or a printed copy can be viewed at the BCC office. ANALYSIS This Corridor Study evaluates the impacts of the proposed extension between 33rd Street and 36th Street. The western terminus at 33rd Street corresponds with the preferred alignment identified in the FDOT SR 5/U.S. 1 at Aviation Boulevard Project Development and Environmental (PD&E) Study. Most of the corridor will require new roadway right-of-way, with improvements planned for approximately 600 feet on 35th Lane south of 36th Street. The proposed cross-section includes: • Two-lane rural roadway section • Buffered bicycle lanes • Pedestrian facilities on both sides of the roadway In December 2024, FDOT granted Location and Design Concept Acceptance for the SR 5/U.S. 1 at Aviation Indian River County, Florida Page 1 of 2 Printed on 11/13/2025 Powb I (_egistar �, Boulevard PD&E Study in the City of Vero Beach. That project begins at 27th Avenue and includes intersection improvements along U.S. 1, extending to 33rd Street. The proposed Aviation Boulevard Extension will connect to these improvements and extend eastward to 35th Lane, with construction expected to coincide with or follow FDOT's project timeline. FDOT's timeline for construction depends upon budget approval and is currently projected for 2032. On April 8, 2025, Work Order No. 19 was issued to Kimley-Horn to prepare a Corridor Study / S.C.A.L.E. Report evaluating five key factors to determine the most feasible roadway alignment: • Safety • Cost • Alternative Alignments • Long -Range Planning • Environmental Considerations The study divided the corridor into two segments: • Segment 1 (South): Connection to the FDOT intersection improvement project • Segment 2 (North): Connection to 35th Lane Feasible alternatives were identified as follows: • No Build • Segment 1 (South): Alternatives D and E • Segment 2 (North): Alternatives F, G, and H The preferred alignment combines Alternative E (South) and Alternative H (North), shown in Figure 12 (Page 30) of the attached report. This alignment provides a direct connection from the City of Vero Beach's 13th Avenue to the Aviation Boulevard Extension. BUDGETARY IMPACT There is no cost to the County associated with this request at this time. POTENTIAL FUTURE BOARD ACTIONS A request for Work Order approval for the design and engineering phase for the preferred alignment identified in the report will be brought to the Board for approval. Funding for design is currently provided within the Capital Improvements Transportation Element. STRATEGIC PLAN ALIGNMENT Overall, the report provides a strategic and technical foundation for decisions that enhance safety, improve mobility, and guide future corridor development. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Board approve this Corridor Study of the proposed extension between 33rd Street and 36th Street. Indian River County, Florida Page 2 of 2 Printed on 11/13/2025 powe lk Legistar'TM Indian River County, Florida * * MEMORANDUM �IpA Indian River County Administration Complex 1801 27th Street Vero Beach, Florida 32960 indianriver.gov File ID: 25-1088 Type: Consent Staff Report Meeting Date: 11/18/2025 TO: Board of County Commissioners THROUGH: John A. Titkanich, Jr., County Administrator Nancy A. Bunt, Assistant County Administrator FROM: David Wheatley, Traffic Control Manager DATE: November 3, 2025 SUBJECT: Interlocal Agreement Between Indian River County and the City of Vero Beach Regarding the Maintenance of Traffic Signal Infrastructure within its Rights of Way BACKGROUND On March 9, 1992, the City of Vero Beach and Indian River County entered into a Traffic Signal Maintenance Agreement to address the maintenance of traffic signalized intersections located within the municipal boundaries of the City. This agreement was subsequently amended on April 6, 1999. ANALYSIS The City and County now wish to enter into a new Traffic Signal Maintenance Agreement to update and clarify the respective responsibilities, costs and procedures related to the maintenance, repair, and operation of traffic signal equipment owned by the City of Vero Beach and located within City limits. Under the proposed agreement, the County will continue to provide both routine and emergency maintenance services for the City's traffic signals. The new agreement is intended to clearly define the roles and obligations of each party to ensure efficient and reliable operation of the traffic signal system within the City. The City of Vero Beach has previously approved and signed the agreement. BUDGETARY IMPACT There is no budgetary impact as this item is memorializing a new agreement. Quarterly reimbursements from the City of Vero Beach will continue to be recorded in the Transportation fund/Traffic Signal Reimbursements account, number 111038-369943. PREVIOUS BOARD ACTIONS The Board of County Commissioners approved a Traffic Signal Maintenance Agreement between the City of Vero Beach, Florida and Indian River County on March 9, 1992. On April 6, 1999, the Board approved Amendment No. 1 to the Agreement. STRATEGIC PLAN ALIGNMENT Indian River County, Florida Page 1 of 2 Printed on 11/13/2025 powej} ( Leyistarnl Aligns with the County's strategic priorities by enhancing public safety, supporting ADA accessibility, improving pedestrian mobility, and fostering a more connected community. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends the Board of County Commissioners approve the Interlocal Agreement between Indian River County and the City of Vero Beach regarding the Maintenance of Traffic Signal Infrastructure within its rights of way and authorize the Chairman to execute the same. Indian River County, Florida Page 2 of 2 Printed on 11/13/2025 poweie46 LegistarT', This TRAFFIC SIGNAL MAINTENANCE INTERIdQCAL:�1 NNE .NT C'Agreemcnf) is enterer iw as of flus day of, - , by and between PIAN RIVER COUNTY, a political subdivision of t-S-- W.of �ltirida -(-County"}, and the CITY OF VERO BEACH, a munktol wporation otawlizod:aAdezisting under the laws of the State of Florida ("City0). County ad.Cbyway also be r emd to min individually as a "'party" or collectively as tare `parties," RMTAIG WHEREAS, the County Mid Citi+ tho�d Chapter 163, Florida StattaW to tow into agreements with other go mental agenda fortltsnost of ient u WHEREAS, the City .ovms and operates own traftsignal devic its jurisdictional boundaries; and, WHEREAS, the County possesses the technical expertise, p n+sary LQ maintain traffic signal devices; and, WHEREAS, the Courity also has an agreement with the F Dqpgatnent of Transportation for the maintenance of traffic signals in indim River CntAWnn�, _ WHERLA1% the Coutr Arid the C* entered into, a Traf c Signal Maiwomftft Agmme* on March 9, l M; ad, WHEREAS, the parties desire to enter We a new AgrvenwM to WtHft 1e ponsibilities and costs and whereby the County will provide Mine and emerges nWatflance services for dw City's traffic signals. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the retoo l Covenants and promises .contained herein, the parties agree as follows: 1. Recitals. The foregoing Recitals are hereby adopted and incoq*rated ,=�. 2. Purpose Tbe purpose of this Agreement is to dune the responsibiliots of the County and theCity regarding the maintenance, repair, and operation oftmffic signal ecptipiMont o*tted by the City of Vero Beach and located within its municipal bound€tries: 3. Scope of Services. The County shall provide the following ser+►►ica-. 141 a) All labor, equipment, and materials, including routine inspection, testing, and preventive maintenance of traffic signal devices as may be reasonable and necessary to maintain in good operating condition, or to repair or reconstruct to restore to good operating condition, all those traffic signals and devices identified in Exhibit "B" attached hereto. b) The County shall maintain all intersection signal hardware, lighting, communication equipment, detection, CCTV systems, cabinet and related hardware, underground utilities (signal wire, and conduit) and system timing plans. e) Work performed shall be performed in accordance with the accepted industry practices, standards, and customs. d) The County shall be free to determine the design, style, make, model, manufacturer, or other specification of any material or equipment used or provided hereunder subject to the provisions of the existing and any future amendments to the agreement between the Florida Department of Transportation and Indian River County. e) Any major intersectional traffic signal design modifications developed by Indian River County as part of this agreement shall be reviewed with the City Engineer and the City shall have the option of substituting equal or better equipment and/or materials. The City shall be responsible for any additional costs incurred. f) The County will prepare and submit an annual report to the City Engineer summarizing repairs, modifications, etc. to the system during the given year. g) The County shall be responsible for documentation and record-keeping of maintenance activities and coordination with utility providers or contractors as required. h) The County shall not be responsible for capital improvements, major signal redesigns, or installations unless separately agreed to in writing. i) The County staff will continue to develop and implement new system -timing plans required to maintain a comprehensive and growing traffic responsive system by completing yearly traffic counts, to stay up to date with current traffic volumetric data. 4. Term. This Agreement shall commence on , 2025, and shall be subject to automatic five- year extensions, starting in 2030, coinciding with the fiscal year of the County, unless either party provides to the other with written notice of an intention to terminate at least one hundred -eighty (180) days in advance of the renewal date, or a more permanent agreement is established by both parties. 5. Compensation. a) The City shall reimburse the County for services rendered under this Agreement based on a mutually agreed fee schedule, attached as Exhibit "A." b) Invoices shall be submitted quarterly and paid by the City within thirty (30) days of receipt. c) The City shall have the right to question and/or dispute the accuracy of County invoiced costs; provided however, the City cannot unreasonably withhold approval of the invoice. If any portion of any invoice is in a bona fide dispute, the City shall remit payment of the undisputed portion of the invoice within thirty (30) days of receipt of invoice and the County and City shall attempt to amicably resolve those disputed portions of the invoice. 142 6. Disasters. The occurrence of any natural or man-made disaster, when declared as such by federal, state, or local government, such as a hurricane, tornado, flood, any act of God, etc., may result in the impossibility of performance of this agreement. The parties agree that this agreement regarding County performance standards and response time set forth elsewhere in this agreement shall be considered temporarily suspended during any such state of disaster. 7. Liability. To the extent allowable by Florida law, the County will only be responsible for claims, demands. suits, liabilities, damages, and losses arising out of or resulting from the negligent acts of commission or omission by its contractors, subcontractors, employees, agents or representatives. Nothing in the Agreement shall be construed as any waiver of sovereign immunity by either party to this contract. Nothing in this Agreement shall limit any actions for recovery the County may have against contractors or contracted workers for any action. 8. Third Parties. The City agrees that the County may enter into services or maintenance agreements with third party providers with respect to any or all the services contemplated herein, either on a full-time or stand-by basis provided the terms and conditions of this Agreement, or any agreement executed between the parties shall continue to govern the relationship. 9. Response Time. It is the County's goal to use its best eftbrts to respond to any emergency repair request in as close to a "zero response time" as possible, but certainly within a period of two (2) hours following receipt of notice and to respond to non -emergency or routine repair requests within a period of twenty-four (24) hours following notice. For the purposes of measuring the `response time" for this agreement, a "request" will be considered "received" upon a direct request from appropriate City staffor notification of a malfunction by the County's intersection monitoring software. An emergency status shall be considered to exist where damage to a traffic signal or device or the malfunction or failure thereof results or has resulted in the creation of a serious present or impending traffic hazard; for example, total loss of power; loose, hanging equipment, loss of a red signal color indication, or flashing operation at a "critical intersection" as identified by the County's monitoring software. A non -emergency or routine repair status shall exist where the damage or malfunction does not create a serious or immediate traffic hazard, for example, non -red LED out flashing operation at non-critical times and intersections. The inability of the County to respond within the stated period where good cause exists shall not be considered a breach of the agreement. 10. City Responsibilities. The City shall: a) Notify the County of any known issues or construction activity affecting signals 143 b) Allow the County reasonable access to signals and related infrastructure. c) Provide necessary rights -of -entry and permits for County personnel. d) Maintain all vegetation within its right of way and shall promptly respond to the County's request for maintenance if impeding the operation and/or safety of intersections. 11. Notice. a) Unless specified by a party in writing otherwise, all notices, demands, or other papers required to be given or made by this Agreement, or which may be given or made, by either party to the other, will be given or made in writing and addressed as follows: (y: Public Works Director City of Vero Beach 1053 20'1' Place Vero Beach, FL 32960 with a copy to the City Manager and City Attorney; and County: Public Works Department Indian River County 1801 271h Street Vero Beach, Florida 32960-3365 with a copy to the County Attorney. The parties will consider notice to be properly given i1; (1) personally delivered; (2) sent by certified U.S. Mail, return receipt requested; or (3) sent by an overnight Ietter delivery company. b) The parties will consider the elrective date ofnotice to be the date personally delivered; or. if sent by U.S. Mail, the date of postmark; or, if sent by an overnight letter delivery company, the dale the notice was picked up by the overnight letter delivery company from the party giving notice. 12. Indemnification. The City and County shall protect, defend, reimburse, indemnify and hold each other; their agents, employees and elected officers, free and harmless at all times from and against any and all claims, liability, expense, loss, cost, damages or causes of action of every kind or character, including attorney's fees and costs, whether at trial or appellate levels or otherwise, arising during and as a result of their performance of the terms of this Agreement or due to the acts or omissions of the City or County. The parties' aforesaid indemnity and hold harmless agreement shall apply to the fullest extent permitted by law, nor shall the liability limits set forth in Florida Statutes § 768.28 be waived. The parties to the Agnreement and their respective officers and employees shall not be deemed to assume any liability for the acts, omissions, and negligence of the other Party. 144 13. Termination. This Agreement may be terminated by either party upon ninety (90) days' written notice to the other party. In the event of termination, the City shall pay for all services performed by the County through the date of termination. 14. Filing. This Agreement, once fully executed, shall be filed with the Clerk of the Court of Indian River County, Florida, by the County. IS. Miscellaneous. a) Governing Law: This Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of Florida. b) Entire Agreement: This document contains the entire agreement between the parties. e) Amendments: No modification shall be effective unless in writing and signed by both parties. 16. Effective Date. This Agreement will become effective upon its filing with the Clerk of the Court of Indian River County, Florida, as required by §163.01(11), Florida Statutes. SIGNATURE PAGE TO FOLLOW [Remainder of Page Intentionally Left Blank] 145 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement as of the date below. APPROVED this day of _ 2025. INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Florida By: Joseph E. Flescher, Chairman ATTEST- By:-- Ryan TTEST: By:Ryan Butler, County Clerk and Comptroller APPROVED: By: John A. Titkanich, Jr., County Administrator Approved as to form and legal sufficiency: By: Christopher Hicks, Assistant County Attorney CITY OF VERO BEACH, a municipal cog.otukgno, of the State of Florida B JoMayg ) ATTEST: By:--1,'S--iK I d4--tzS Sherri Philo, City Clerk APPROVED: By: - - v l A � � �• Monte K. Falls, P.E., Ci y Manager Approved as two form and legal sufficiency: B Y�L� John S. urner Ci ty Attorney 146 Exhibit "A" Service Rate Schedule The hourly labor rate of all Technicians shall be charged based on their current rate of'pay: Traffic Signal Technician II: $28.00 to $42.00 per hour Traffic Signal Technician 1: $23.00 to $35.00 per hour Chief Signal Technician: $31.00 to $46.00 per hour Traffic Technicians: $19.00 to $36.00 per hour Traffic Engineering: $33.00 to $85.00 per hour Parts: Actual cost, plus 10% Equipment • Aerial Bucket Service Truck: $35.00 to $55.00 per hour • Generator: $5.00 per hour Note: The hourly rates shall be reviewed on a bi-annual basis and adjusted per the mutual concurrence of both parties executing this agreement to be effective on the first day of the next fiscal year. If any services are sub -contracted per section 7 of this agreement, actual costs will he reimbursed. 147 INTERSECTION NUMBER 101 _. 0&2 INTERSECTION NAME 233-T DEVICE CITY % COUNTY % 1.ST A 14AV .... 910NAL 1 _ 41 _ 1ST 0.17AVE RAL 42. 1.65T1 � qNAL 50 a 44 t7sT a tOAVE.WIN AL . 11 21STiAV , LMAL, 149 AVIATION 6;A 1: $04AL . 11 1 ? AVIATI{I%i AIRPORT 3ABIMigkL roft 210 A 'L`1+C AD1 11 : LIGNAI . 511 30 6 6T A 43AVE.. SI+fiAL. 269N M8104AN LC IC I BEACON 10 2698 rpSrimL 14AVE, NB 1wA +T r 110 20PL 6A !L UK 55E R4 EWWD EC SM .N ScHWL 100°/0 55W ROSEWOODELEM SMOOL AWN 100°a _ E 1 i i I48 Indian River County, Florida * MEMORANDUM �tpA -1, L' Indian River County Administration Complex 1801 27th Street Vero Beach, Florida 32960 indianriver.gov File ID: 25-1090 Type: Consent Staff Report Meeting Date: 11/18/2025 TO: Board of County Commissioners THROUGH: John A. Titkanich, Jr., County Administrator Anthony Warren, Building & Facilities Services Director FROM: Rob Skok, Capital Projects Manager DATE: November 5, 2025 SUBJECT: Change Order No. 2 and Release of Retainage - Bathroom Renovations IRC Main Library and North County Library (IRC -2403 / CP -2510) BACKGROUND On April 9, 2024, Work Order No. 1 was issued to Edlund, Dritenbas, Binkley Architects and Associates, P.A. for professional design services for the bathroom remodels at both the Main and North Indian River County Libraries. A bid opening for the project was held on January 23, 2025, resulting in the award of bid 2025007 issued to Diaz Constructors, LLC for $507,949.00. ANALYSIS Change Order No. 2 is to make final. adjustments to contract bid items for a (decrease) to the total contract by ($65,876.00) resulting in a final contract price of $442,073.00. Diaz Constructors, LLC has completed the project and has been paid $351,267.01 to date. Contractor is due Pay Application #6 for $72,318.25 and $18,487.74 held in retainage for a total payout of $90,805.99. BUDGETARYIMPACT Funding, in the total amount of $90,805.99, will come from the following sources: Optional Sales Tax/Retainage/Main Library Bathroom/Retainage - Diaz Constructors - 315-206000-22021 - $11,903.60 Optional Sales Tax/Retainage/North County Library Bathroom/Retainage - Diaz Constructors - 315-206000- 22022 - $6,584.14 Optional Sales Tax/Main Library/Main Library Restroom Renovation - 31510971-066510-22021 - $2,655.00 Optional Sales Tax/North County Library/North County Library Restroom Renovation - 31511271-066510- 22022 - $69,663.25 PREVIOUS BOARD ACTIONS The Board awarded Bid No. 2025007 to Diaz Constructors, LLC for Bathroom Renovations Indian River Indian River County, Florida Page 1 of 2 Printed on 11/13/2025 pow4jay LeTM gistar' County Main Library and North County Library. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommend approval of Change Order No. 2 and payment of Contractor's Application of Payment Diaz Constructors, LLC in the amount of $90,805.99. Printed on 11/13/2025 pow erO( LegistarT SECTION 00942 - Change Order Form DATE OF ISSUANCE: 11/3/2025 No. 2 EFFECTIVE DATE: 11/18/2025 OWNER: Indian River County CONTRACTOR: Diaz Constructors, LLC Project: Bathroom Renovations IRC Main Library and North County Library OWNER's Project No. IRC -2403 / CP -2510 OWNER'S Bid No. 2025007 You are directed to make the following changes in the Contract Documents: Reason for Change Order: The project is complete. This change order is intended to make final adjustments to bid line and items and time to finalize the contract. Attachment: Description of Itemized Changes -J CHANGE IN CONTRACT PRICE: Description Amount Original Contract Price $507,949.00 Net (Decrease) of this Change Order: ($65,876.00) Contract Price with all approved Change Orders: $442,073.00 ACCEPTED: By: CONTRACTOR (Signature) RECOMMENDED: By: CHANGE IN CONTRACT TIMES Description Time Original Contract Time: (days) Substantial Completion: 150 Final Completion: 180 Net increase this Change 17 Order: (days) Substantial Completion: 167 Final Completion: 197 Contract Time with all approved Change Orders: (days) Substantial Completion: 167 Final Completion: 197 PROJECT MANAGER (Signature) APPROVED: By: OWNER (Signature) 00942-1 151 CHANGE ORDER NO. 2 DESCRIPTION OF ITEMIZED CHANGES PROJECT NAME: Bathroom Renovations Indian River County Main'Library and North County Library PROJECT NO. IRC - 24031 CP -2510 BID NO. 2025007 Item No. Description Unit Quantity Unit Price Price Increase Price Decrease WCD#1 Floor Leveling, Electrical, Fire Ext. Box, Ceiling LS 1.00 $ 9,898.00 $ 9,898.00 WCD#2 Floor Tile NCL Vestibule, Baby changing station, Jolly Liner, Electrical, HVAC, 14 Days Added LS 1.00 $ 11,161.00 $ 11,161.00 WCD#3 Emergency Lights, Floor Drain Mens RR NCL LS 1.00 $ 5,565.00 $ 5,565.00 999-25 Force Account $ 40,000.00 Item 1 Per Day Surcharge for Evening or Weekend Work $ 52,500.00 SUBTOTALS 26,624.00 92,500.00 Bathroom Renovations Indian River County Main Library and North County Library TOTAL -$65,876.00 152 1 F:\BuildingBFacilRie Dept\Projects\CP-2510 Library Bathroom Renovations\1-AdmimAgenda Items\Project Closeout\CP-2510_FCO_20251103 SECTION 00622 - Contractor's Application for Payment CP -2510 Bathroom Renovations Indian River County Main Library and North County Library. Application for Payment No. 6 For Work Accomplished through the period of 9/1/2025 throuoh 9/30/2025 . To: Indian River County (OWNER) From: Diaz Constructors. (CONTRACTOR) Project No.: CP -2510 Bid No.: 2025007 1) Attach detailed schedule and copies of all paid invoices. 1. Original Contract Price: 507,949. 2. Net change by Change Orders and Written Amendments (+ or-): 1(44V073.0 6876.0 3. Current Contract Price (1 plus 2): 4. Total completed and stored to date: $ 5. Retainage (per Agreement): 5% retainage: �o 6. Total completed and stored to date less retainage (4 minus 5): L 7. Less previous Application for Payments: 351,267.01 6. DUE THIS APPLICATION 6 MINUS 90,805.99 31510971-066510-22021 $15,000.00 CONTRACTOR'S CERTIFICATION: 31511271-066510-22022 $75,805.99 UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY, the undersigned CONTRACTOR certifies that (1) the labor and materials listed on this request for payment have been used in the construction of this Work; (2) payment received from the last pay request has been used to make payments to all subcontractors, laborers, materialmen and suppliers except as listed on Attachment A, below; (3) title of all Work, materials and equipment incorporated in said Work or otherwise listed in or covered by this Application for Payment will pass to OWNER at time of payment free and dear of all Liens, security interests and encumbrances (except such as are covered by a Bond acceptable to OWNER indemnifying OWNER against any such Lien, security interest or encumbrance); (4) all Work covered by this Application for Payment is in accordance with the Contract Documents and not defective; and (5) If this Periodic Estimate is for a Final Payment to project or improvement, I further certify that all persons doing work upon or furnishing materials or supplies for this project or improvement under this foregoing contract have been paid in full, and that all taxes imposed by Chapter 212 Florida Statutes, (Sales and Use Tax Act, as Amended) have been paid and discharged, and that I have no claims against the OWNER. Attached to or submitted with this form are: 1. Signed release of lien forms (partial or final as applicable) from all subcontractors, laborers, materialmen and suppliers except as listed on Attachment A, together with an explanation as ny release of lien form is not included; �.htANQt33@.R'al 00622-1 "Ilm000fhyAnOowsVMstCad* CwAont.dAooklUSX719MRCP-2510 PAS -20260930 (002).60c Rev. 06101 CP -2510 PA8_20250930 (002) 153 [The remainder of this page was left blank intentionally] 00622-2 CP-2510,PA6 20250830(002) C511rKs t�xz s pi sta lwMd aowfiWrido+.aJNNCarhtr Con�rd OWOOMU3x7191MCP-2510_PAO_202509M (002) me Rov O&C i 154 Page 3 of 5 SURETY'S CONSENT OF PAYMENT TO CONTRACTOR: The Surety, Capitol Indemnity Corporation M.; .. a corporation, in accordance with Public Construction Bond Number CIC1960899 hereby consents to payment by the OWNER to the CONTRACTOR, for the amounts specified in this CONTRACTOR's APPLICATION FOR PAYMENT. TO BE EXECUTED BY CORPORATE SURETY: Attest: Mary Early i ad STATE OF New York COUNTY OF Nassau Caaitol Indemnity Coro tion Cbrporate Surety 1600 Aspen Commons STE 300 Middleton WI 53562 Business Address BY: Print Name: Jeffrey W. Price Title: Attorney -in -Fact (Affix Corporate SEAL) Sworn to (or affirmed) and subscribed before me by means of ❑ physical presence or ❑ online notarization, this 23rd day of October 20,V_, by Jeffrey W. Price (name of person making statement). (Signatur otary Public - State of Florida) (Print, Type, or Stamp Commissioned Name of Notary .Public) i�u Ua PRICE 0 who is personally known to me or ❑ who has producedtorAtcruauc,loFrwYoxrs as identification (2ttalii in YQas�n Connty My Ci±mTnjW t Vxpims'Match 4, 2tX trt,kr**,at,t*,rr**,tt,t**�,r*,4,t*,t,t,r,t,t*,r.tir*+r+t+r*+kt,t,rrr,t*,r,t****,t*,t****,t,t*,rtit�ritirtrir**�tr�r,rirtwr,t**mfr#,rr+rrr**w*,k+ririrw* [The remainder of this page was left blank intentionally] 00622-3 CWsersOiaz-Ar)pData�LocaRMicrosoRlWino-sliNetCacnelContent.Oupook\U3X7191R1CP-2510_PA6_20250930 (002) doc Rev 05101 cP-25.PAs�o2D 156 Page 4of5 CERTIFICATION OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY PROJECT MANAGER: I certify that I have reviewed the above and foregoing Periodic Estimate for Partial Payment; that to the best of my knowledge and belief it appears to be a reasonably accurate statement of the work performed and/or material supplied by the Contractor. I am not certifying as to whether or not the Contractor has paid all subcontractors, laborers, materialmen and suppliers because I am not in a position to accurately determine that issue. Dated SIGNATURE CERTIFICATION OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY INSPECTOR: I have checked the estimate against the Contractor's Schedule of Amounts for Contract Payments and the notes and reports of my inspections of the project. To the best of my knowledge, this statement of work performed and/or materials supplied appears to be reasonably accurate, that the Contractor appears to be observing the requirements of the Contract with respect to construction, and that the Contractor should be paid the amount requested above, unless otherwise noted by me. I am not certifying as to whether or not the Contractor has paid all subcontractors, laborers, materialmen and suppliers because I am not in a position to accurately determine that issue. Dated SIGNATURE [The Remainder of This Page Was Left Blank Intentionally] 00622-4 C' Users Diaz-WppDMMLocaeMiaosofiWrWovn _ _ 7191R1CP-2510_PA6_20250M (002) doc Rev 05/01 Page 5 of 5 CP-2510_PA6_20250930 (002) 157 ATTACHMENT A 1. List of all subcontractors, laborers, materialmen and suppliers who have not been paid from the payment received from the last Pay Request and the reason why they were not paid (attach additional pages as necessary): 2. List of all subcontractors, laborers, materialmen and suppliers for which a signed release of lien form (partial or final as applicable) is not included with this Pay Request, together with an explanation as to why the release of lien form is not included (attach additional pages as necessary): CP-251O_PA6_2025O930 (002) 00622-5 C tUsers\Diaz-tAppData�Loca[\MlcrosoRtWlnCoweUNeIOldW%Content.OUdookW3X7191RCP-2510_PA6_202509W(W2).tloc Rev. 05101 - 158 CAPITOL INDEMNITY CORPORATION BALANCE SHEET December 31, 2024 Admitted Assets Cash and invested assets: Bonds $ 5,113,369 Common stocks 125,828,587 Cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments LET 532,405,346 Total cash and invested assets 663,347,302 Investment income due and accrued 29,125 Uncollected premiums and agents' balances in course of collection 80,783,002 Deferred premiums, agents' balances and installments booked but deferred and not yet due 4,563,543 Amounts recoverable from reinsurers 12,878,478 Other amounts receivable under reinsurance contracts 159.:. 173,799 Net deferred tax asset 12,299,391 Electronic data processing equipment and software 777,545 Receivables from parent, subsidiaries and affiliates 152,766 Other admitted assets 89,432 Total admitted assets $ 775,094,383 Liabilities and Surplus as Regards Policyholders Liabilities: Losses $ 216,962,687 Reinsurance payable on paid losses and loss adjustment expenses 49,064,738 Loss adjustment expenses 64,047,026 Commissions payable, contingent commissions and other similar charges 1,142,516 Other expenses (excluding taxes, licenses and fees) 12,623,642 Taxes, licenses and fees (excluding federal and foreign income taxes) 174,854 Current federal and foreign income taxes 45,139 Unearned premiums 84,8",952 Advance premium 17,761 Ceded reinsurance premiums payable (net of ceding commissions) (11,551,010) Amounts withheld or retained by company for account of others 15,082,393 Payable to parent, subsidiaries and affiliates 31,964,968 Other liabilities 1,585,098 Total liabilities 466,004,764 Surplus as regards policyholders: Common capital stock 4,201,416 Gross paid in and contributed surplus 103,923,753 Unassigned funds (surplus) 200,964,450 Surplus as regards policyholders 309,089,619 Total liabilities and capital and surplus $ 775,094,383 I, Adam L. Sills, CEO and President of Capitol Indemnity Corporation do hereby certify that to the best of my knowledge and belief, the foregoing is a full and true statutory Statement of Admitted Assets and Liabilities, Capital and Surplus of the Operation at December 31, 2024, prepared in conformity with the accounting practices prescribed by the Insurance Department of the State of Wisconsin. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have set my handl and affixed the seal of the Corporation at Middleton, Wisconsin. Adam L. Sills CEO & President ���NlswrrNgr��� �a••'��,NI T Y �+'y,,� s �^ LET . `- NSF` h�tsfsefaNNt• 159.:. CAMML INDEX CORPORATION C1C19M99 POWER OF ATTORNEY Bond Number KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, That the CAPITOL INDEMNITY CORPORATION, a corporation of the State of Wisconsin, having its principal offices in the City of Middleton, Wisconsin, does make, constitute and appoint ----------»» --»----- --»----- JEFFREY W PRICE; MARY ANNA PRICE; RACHEL PRICE ---»--»—•-+•» ........ ....... .�..__ its true and lawful Attomey(s)-in-fact, to make, execute, seal and deliver for and on its behalf, as surety, and as its act and deed, any and all bonds, undertakings and contracts of suretyship, provided that no bond or undertaking or contract of suretyship executed under this authority shall exceed in amount the sum of ----------------------- ALL WRITTEN INSTRUMENTS IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED: $20,000,000.00 - This Power of Attorney is granted and is signed and sealed by facsimile under and by the authority of the following Resolution adopted by the Board of Directors of CAPITOL INDEMNITY CORPORATION at a meeting duly called and held on the 15th day of May, 2002. "RESOLVED, that the President, Executive Vice President, Vice President, Secretary or Treasurer, acting individually or otherwise, be and they hereby are granted the power and authorization to appoint by a Power of Attorney for the purposes only of executing and attesting bonds and undertakings, and other writings obligatory in the nature thereof, one or more resident vice-presidents, assistant secretaries and attomey(s)-in-fact, each appointee to have the powers and duties usual to such offices to the business of this company; the signature of such officers and seal of the Company may be affixed to any such power of attorney or to any certificate relating thereto by facsimile, and any such power of attorney or certificate hearing such facsimile signatures or facsimile seal shall be valid and binding upon the Company. and any such power so executed and certified by facsimile signatures and facsimile seal shall be valid and binding upon the Company in the future with respect to any bond or undertaking or other writing obligatory in the nature thereof to which it is attached. Any such appointment may be revoked, for cause, or without cause, by any of said officers, at any time." In connection with obligations in favor of the Florida Department of Transportation only, it is agreed that the power and authority hereby given to the Attorney -in -Fact includes any and all consents for the release of retained percentages and/or final estimates on engineering and construction contracts required by the State of Florida Department of Transportation. It is fully understood that consenting to the State of Florida Department of Transportation making payment of the final estimate to the Contractor and/or its assignee, shall not relieve this surety company of any of its obligations under its bond. In connection with obligations in favor of the Kentucky Department of Highways only, it is agreed that the power and authority hereby given to the Attorney -in -Fact cannot be modified or revoked unless prior written personal notice of such intent has been given to the Commissioner - Department of Highways of the Commonwealth of Kentucky at least thirty (30) days prior to the modification or revocation. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the CAPITOL INDEMNITY CORPORATION has caused these presents to be signed by its officer undasipW land its corporate seal to be hereto affixed duly attested, this Ist day of January, 2020. Attest. apauuunuuCAPITOL INDEMNITY CORPORATION Ryan J. Byrnes Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer Q, � and Treasurer Suzanne M. Broadbent Assistant Secretary CU John L. Sennott, Jr. Chief Executive Officer and President STATE OF WISCONSIN COUNTY OF DANE S.S.: On the 1 st day of January, 2020 before me personally came John L. Sennott, Jr, to me known, who being by me duly swom, did depose and say: that he resides in the County of Hartford, State of Connecticut; that he is Chief Executive Officer and President of CAPITOL, INDEMNITY CORPORATION, the corporation described in and which executed the above instrument; that he knows the seal of the said corporation; that the seal affixed to said instrument is such corporate seal; that it was so affixed by order of the Board of Directors of said corporation and that he signed his name thereto by like order. """Oau 1M ##, J. ReC'k1,,, David J. Regele Notary Public, Dane Co., WI STATE OF WISCONSIN p �r` \ My Commission Is Permanent COUNTY OF DANE } S S.: mm "a` 1, the undersigned, duly elected to the office stated below, now the incumbent in CAPITOL INDEMNITY CORPORATION, a Wisconsin Corporation, authorized to make this certificate, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing attached Power of Attomey remains in full force and has not barn revoked; and furthermore, that the Resolution of the Board of Directors, act forth in the Power of Attorney is now in force. Signed and scaled at the City of Middleton. State of Wisconsin Octtlb9r 20 25 �a Aiidtt iril.) itsAt[atos rmraxauu - Senior Vice President, GeNOM jounsel and Secretary TM DOCUMENT HAS BEEN GENERATED FOR A' VW SAVE ANY QUESTIONS CONCERNING THE AtITSO M OF THIS DOCUMENT CALL 800475-4430. CIC-ePOA-M (Rp 1 2020) m J z 2 0 F 0 Z:. O N O m V g 0 a Z z adN A z a z 0 a LLI 2 Ir 0 a m x Z C 8 0 8 C SO 0 O p O O 8 0 8 0 8 0 8 O p O 0 p O O p 8 0 $ O p O 0 p O 0 8 0 8 O S 0 S O p O 0 p O 0 p 8 0 LL O Wr z � $ o 8 O 8 O 8 o 8 0 8 0 8 0 8 0 8 0 8 0 5 o 8 O 8 O 8 O 8 O 8$$ O o o 8 O 8 o 8 0 0 8 8 8 S 8 8 8 8 8 8 S 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 a� a Or 8 8 8 5 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 N 0 0 0 o c o 0 0 0 o c o e o 0 0 0 0 o e o 0 C p S 8 p O p O p O p O p O p 8 p O p O p O Q S p p O p O S p O S p O S �Op aaO pVSp n ^� O 6 O u oa S 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0 g o o W 6 8 I 8$ 5 8 0 0 0 8 8 8 $ 8 c 8$ .. c c d n n S O'- F " O_ C i�. y; Z O 8 .r O + O + O ti 8 8 O1 O O S .+ O�1 C O •+ O .i S OO o T O m a N o M o S .w W p E Iv O1 n as n o vNi •! m N � N a m " a m a e N n o D O 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 u o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 q o q o q r h h h h h h h h h !n h n h n h n h h i z cl zo 8N�°G N ..a2uc ate( Fo .-z m 3 o<f6= r O isx2-. O O z O � z m W 2 2 u o �u�[[<Om WLL S Lo Z Sm ra Z O w < 6 yOp w o Fj f K2~v�0if Z F O 2 W C Q r zaOLL Z o> < Y c 6 0 z Z O Y p C u us�o r oao�o p Q t �g�a z a n a N O o z F wr i ° z 3 c b o a w o r Z a N d z o i F u j r is G JO u Q i g in m m 7° a m z N o n r m z 0 f z wz a w O N W ¢ arc r m ag a z E o E iri Z Q ¢ w O a u 7 V f < f O � N O = c 2 0 z 0 Z o Z o b 2 0 n Z 0 m Z 0 Z 0 Oz Z o Z 0 Z o N Z o z o z 0 z 0 z 0 z 0 z 0 2 0 z 2 0 z 0 D O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O D D D G Indian River County, Florida *�A * MEMORANDUM File ID: 25-1092 Type: Consent Staff Report TO: The Honorable Board of County Commissioners THROUGH: John A. Titkanich, County Administrator FROM: Michael C. Zito, Deputy County Administrator DATE: October 23, 2025 Indian River County Administration Complex 1801 27th Street Vero Beach, Florida 32960 indianriver.gov Meeting Date: 11/18/2025 SUBJECT: Amendment to Add Porte Cochere for Sandridge Golf Club New Clubhouse BACKGROUND On October 1, 2021, the Board approved an agreement with Sun Patric Architecture, Inc., DBA sparcdesign, as a result of RFQ 2021020, to execute the architectural and engineering design of the new clubhouse. The original design, issued as bid 2024029, was for an 18,000 square -foot facility. Bids were opened on February 8, 2024, with the low bid of $14,670,444.26 exceeding available and anticipated funding. The Board rejected the bids associated with 2024029 at its February 20, 2024 meeting, and authorized staff to work with the architect to refine the design to reduce scope and cost. Additional modifications to the agreement with sparcdesign were approved by the Board throughout design. Sandridge Golf Club endeavored to replace its existing clubhouse, built in 1992. A prior bid for construction was far above budget, leading to the following primary modifications to the original design: 1) Removal of the Port Cochere at the entrance to the building: estimated to save $600,000 2) Removal of a 3/4 mile stretch of 12" water pipe for a fire hydrant, instead allowing a dry fire hydrant: estimated to save $700,000 3) Lowered the building three feet to putting green level, eliminating the need for a retaining wall, railings and stairs; estimated to save $500,000 After completion of updated plans, bid 2025026 was advertised on January 29, 2025, and six bids submitted by the March 19, 2025 deadline for submittals. The scope of work included construction of site improvements, the clubhouse, a turn building, parking lot improvements, installation of a standby generator, and demolition of the existing clubhouse. The Board awarded the contract to Quest Contracting, LLC at a total base bid of $11,200,984 which was $2.4 million lower than the bids in 2024. ANALYSIS During the March 27, 2025 Board Meeting and during the groundbreaking ceremony in June, Staff was requested to look into the cost of adding the Porte Cochere back to the project due to its impact on the future operations of the new facility particularly regarding future functions. Sparcdesign also submitted Additional Indian River County, Florida Page 1 of 2 Printed on 11/13/2025 powTO LegistarT r Service #8 for the design, engineering, construction administration, and civil engineering for a total of $39,800. This brings the total contract with sparcdesign to $558,455. Additionally, Quest Contracting, LLC has submitted a proposal to add and construct the Porte Cochere for $286, 913 which is substantially less than the original bid that was submitted in 2024. This brings the total contract cost to $11,487,897 with Quest Contracting. BUDGETARYIMPACT Funding for the Porte Cochere, in the amount of $286,913 for the construction and $39,800 (for a total of $326,713), will come from the Sandridge/WIP/Sandridge Clubhouse account, number 418-169000-21018. PREVIOUS BOARD ACTIONS On March 27, 2025, the Board approved an agreement with Quest Contracting, LLC to construct the Sandridge Golf Club Clubhouse. STRATEGIC PLAN ALIGNMENT Quality of Life STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends the Board to accept the Porte Cochere Budget by Quest Contracting, LLC and Additional Service #8 with sparcdesign, approve the sample agreement, and authorize the Chairman to execute it, after review and approval of the agreement. Indian River County, Florida Page 2 of 2 Printed on t111/13/2025 PoW 1V4 Legistar„s Porte Cochere Budget # 2 10/8/202:1 2424 SF Foundations (F3050 x 12) $ 16,667 Steel (SC -1 x 8) $ 14,000 Beams & Framing (215LF) $ 20,800 Trusses & Install (1980 SF) $ 27,794 Roofing (1980 SF) $ 37,620 Gutters (160 Lf) $ 4,800 Stucco (1434 SF) $ 11,472 PVC Column Wraps 2 ft x 14ft (12 each) $ 38,016 PVC Ceiling with Panel Trims (2424 SF) $ 50,962 Rafter Tails (69) $ 11,466 Painting (3224 SF) $ 3,869 Electrical (Lights 12 each) $ 6,750 Pavers at Covered Drive $ 5,364 Header Curbs $ 3,900 Subtotal $ 253,480 Liability Inusrance $ 2,408 Payment & Performance Bond (01-820): $ 2,166 Builders Risk $ 2,184 Subtotal Project Cost $ 260,238 OH & P $ 13,012 SubTotal $ 273,250 5% Contingengy $ 13,663 Total Budget $ 286,913 165 CP -2511 SECTION 00942 — Change Order Form No. 1 DATE OF ISSUANCE: 11/18/25 EFFECTIVE DATE: 11/18/25 OWNER: Indian River County CONTRACTOR Quest Contracting, LLC. Project: Sandridge Golf Club New Clubhouse OWNER'S Bid No. 2025026 You are directed to make the following changes in the Contract Documents: Description: Furnish all materials and construct a Porte Cochere to the plans submitted by the Architect. This change was requested by staff to investigate the cost of adding the Porte Cochere due to its impact on the future operations of the new facility particularly regarding future functions. Reason for Change Order: This Change Order provides full compensation to the Contractor for all work, materials, and labor, as detailed above. Attachments: (List documents supporting change) Porte Cochere Desien and Budeet CHANGE IN CONTRACT PRICE: Description Amount Original Contract Price $11,200,984.00 Substantial Completion: Net Increase (Decrease) from previous Change Orders No. to $ 0 Contract Price prior to this Change Order: $11,200,984.00 Net increase (decrease) of this Change Order: $286,913.00 Contract Price with all approved Change Orders: $11,487,897.00 ACCEPTED: By: CONTRACTOR (Signature) Date: CHANGE IN CONTRACT TIMES Description Time Original Contract Time: (days or dates) Substantial Completion: Final Completion: Net change from previous Change Orders No. to (days) Substantial Completion: Final Completion: Contract Time prior to this Change Order: (days or dates) Substantial Completion: Final Completion: Net increase (decrease) this Change Order: (days or dates) Substantial Completion: Final Completion: Contract Time with all approved Change Orders: (days or dates) Substantial Completion: Final Completion: RECOMMENDED: By: ENGINEER (Signature) Date: APPROVED: By: OWNER (Signature) Date: Change Order Form — (f6,6 October 31,2025 The Owner: Bela Nagy, Director of Golf, PGA c/o Indian River County Purchasing Division 1800 27th Street Vero Beach, Florida 32960 The Architect: Sun Patrick Architecture, Inc. DBA: sparcdesign 3021 Jupiter Park Circle, Suite 102 Jupiter, FL 33458 RE: Sandridge Golf Club New Clubhouse Sparcdesign project 2021.159 Additional Service #8, Porte Cochere Addition Dear Mr. Nagy: We are submitting this additional service request for additional scope of work to revise the bid/construction/permit documents dated October 27,2023. The bid documents will be updated based on adding a porte cochere to the main entry of the building. Sparcdesign will utilize conceptual pricing sketches to prepare revised construction documents that will graphically show the scope, extent, and character of the work to be performed by the contractor, including specifications and related architectural, structural, electrical, civil and landscape plans. Sparcdesign will prepare the required drawings for architectural and engineering submittal to the county for review. Sparcdesign will submit plans electronically to the owner for the bidding phase. Will respond to request for information during the bidding period. Sparcdesign will prepare and process and administrative amendment for the revised site plan through Indian River County planning and development services department. This proposal includes HE specifications for the County direct purchasing. The following disciplines are included in this additional service proposal. • Architecture, Interior Design, Electrical Engineering, Fire Protection Design, Structural Engineering, Civil Engineering, and Landscape Architecture/Planning. Professional services fee breakdown for additional service no. 10 Revised bid documents based on Porte Cochere Addition. • Architecture/Engineering $ 15,000.00 • Construction Administration $ 3,300.00 • Land Planning (Amendment) $ 11,000.00 • Civil Engineering $ 5,000.00 (NTE) • Interior Design FFE specs $ 5,500.00 Total $ 39,800.00 - 2 - I P a g e We propose to perform this work as an additional service utilizing the terms outlined in the Agreement for Professional Services for Sandridge Clubhouse Architectural Design Services - RFQ2021020-Master Plan Study Phase dated October 1, 2021. We propose to perform this task for a fixed fee of Thirty -Four Thousand Eight Hundred dollars and a not to exceed fee of Five Thousand Dollars ($39,800). Feel free to contact me with any comments or questions you have. Acceptance of this proposal may be indicated by signing, dating, and returning (1) copy of this letter. Sincerely, Sean Sukhu, Partner Client Signature and date Printedname and title E m ------------ C4 E vnio diof) 3oaiSONVS EE ri t LU ------------ Indian River County, Florida # * MEMORANDUM �IpA File ID: 25-1093 /A Indian River County Administration Complex 1801 27th Street Vero Beach, Florida 32960 indianriver.gov Type: Consent Staff Report Meeting Date: 11/18/2025 TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS THROUGH: John A. Titkanich, Jr., County Administrator Kristin Daniels, Director, Office of Management and Budget Jennifer Hyde, Procurement Manager FROM: Shelby Ball, Procurement Specialist DATE: November 5, 2025 SUBJECT: Amendment to Agreement for EDSAP (RFP 2024059) BACKGROUND On November 19, 2024, the Board of County Commissioners awarded RFP 2024059 for an Economic Development Strategic Action Plan (EDSAP) to TIP Strategies, Inc. The EDSAP aims to enhance economic growth, attract investments, retain businesses, and foster employment opportunities within the County. ANALYSIS The current agreement with TIP Strategies will expire on November 19, 2025. The Planning & Development Services Department would like to amend this agreement to allow for a six-month extension, with a new agreement expiration date of May 19, 2026. Completion of the project has been delayed due to various reasons including: TIP Strategies change of the County's project manager, as well as requested revisions to the first draft of the plan by the Economic Development Council. BUDGETARY IMPACT There is no additional fiscal impact, as the Consultant is not requesting additional funding. PREVIOUS BOARD ACTIONS Approval of RFP Award STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends the Board approve the Amendment to the Agreement and authorize the Chairman to execute it, after review and approval by the County Attorney as to form and legal sufficiency. Indian River County, Florida Page 1 of 1 Printed on 11/13/2025 pow e�i ly LegistarT , FIRST AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT FOR ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT STRATEGIC ACTION PLAN (EDSAP) This First Amendment to that certain Agreement to complete development of an Economic Development Strategic Action Plan is entered into effective as of November 18, 2025, by and between Indian River County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida ("County") and TIP Strategies, Inc. ("Consultant"). BACKGROUND RECITALS WHEREAS, the County and the Consultant entered into an Agreement for the development of an EDSAP effective November 19, 2024; and WHEREAS, Paragraph 3 of the Agreement contains the term provisions; and WHEREAS, the first term commenced effective as of November 19, 2024, and will end on November 18, 2025; and WHEREAS, the parties desire to extend the Agreement for an additional six- month period; and NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing, and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the County and the Consultant agree as follows: 1. The background recitals are true and correct and form a material part of this First Amendment. 2. The renewal term shall commence effective November 19, 2025, and shall end on May 18, 2026. 3. All other terms and provisions of the Agreement shall be unchanged and remain in full force and effect. 172 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this First Amendment to be executed effective the day and year first set forth above. TIP Strategies, Inc. By: Printed name: Title: (Corporate Seal) Date: INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS TBD, Chairman Attest: Ryan L. Butler, Clerk of Circuit Court And Comptroller By: Deputy Clerk Approved: John A. Titkanich, Jr. County Administrator Approved as to form and legal sufficiency: Susan J. Prado Deputy County Attorney 173 File ID: 25-1094 Indian River County, Florida MEMORANDUM Indian River County Administration Complex 1801 27th Street Vero Beach, Florida 32960 indianriver.gov Type: Consent Staff Report Meeting Date: 11/18/2025 TO: The Honorable Board of County Commissioners THROUGH: John A. Titkanich, Jr., County Administrator Michael C. Zito, Deputy County Administrator FROM: Beth Powell, Parks, Recreation, & Conservation Director DATE: November 5, 2025 SUBJECT: Agreement for 2026 Use of Facilities for Polling Location - Intergenerational Recreation Center BACKGR UND The Intergenerational (IG) Recreation Center has previously been used as a polling location by the Supervisor of Elections. In October 2025, the Supervisor of Elections requested the use of the Intergenerational Recreation Center as a polling location for Precinct #25 for the following dates: -August 18, 2026 for the Primary Election -November 3, 2026 for the General Election. ANALYSIS Indian River County and Supervisor of Elections staff determined that the IG Center is suitable and available for use as a polling location. Staff will be available to open the building and staff it during the days noted in the attached Agreement. BUDGETARYIMPACT There is no direct budgetary impact for this request. PREVIOUS BOARD ACTIONS Approval of Early Voting Location for 2025-2026 - BCC approved 6/3/2025 POTENTIAL FUTURE BOARD ACTIONS There are no known potential future board actions related to this request. STRATEGIC PLAN ALIGNMENT Quality of Life OTHER PLAN ALIGNMENT N/A Indian River County, Florida Page 1 of 2 Printed on 11/13/2025 pow Ig1 tom+ L_egistarT" STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners accept the Agreement for 2025-2026 RE: Use of Facilities as Polling Place and authorize the Chairman to execute the agreement after review by the County Attorney for legal sufficiency. Indian River County, Florida Page 2 of 2 Printed on 11/13/2025 pow eiqj�j Legistar'M Precincts) # 25 A G R E E M E N T for 2025 - 2026 Re: Use of Facilities as Polling Place THIS AGREEMENT, made this 2nd day of October 2025, by and between the INDIAN RIVER COUNTY SUPERVISOR OF ELECTIONS (Hereafter SUPERVISOR), and Intergenerational Center — Room I I 2 (Hereafter PROVIDER), WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, polling in Indian River County has traditionally been held in places such as churches, community centers, and civic organization buildings; and WHEREAS, orderly administration dictates that a contract for the use of these facilities be entered into between the SUPERVISOR and the PROVIDER; NOW, THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the mutual covenants and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, SUPERVISOR and PROVIDER agree as follows: 1. PROVIDER shall allow the SUPERVISOR the use of its facilities as a polling place for the election(s) to be held on: August 18, 2026 - ] r=xyDecaon November 3, 2026 - General Election Any Special Elections 2. PROVIDER shall provide the SUPERVISOR access to the facilities for the placement and removal of voting machines and other related equipment. Following the delivery, the Supervisor of Elections staff will coordinate a mutually agreed upon date and time to set-up the polling room. Once the equipment is set-up by the Supervisor of Elections staff, we request you restrict access to the polling room for the security of the voting equipment. The polling place Clerk will coordinate with your contact person for entrance to the polling place on Monday to finalize Election Day details and on the day of the election from 6:00 a.m. until the Election Board has completed all procedures. 3. SUPERVISOR shall pay the PROVIDER for the use of said facilities the sum of $ 0.00 4. SUPERVISOR shall cause to be issued general liability insurance in the amount $200,000/$300,000 covering "all elections at all polling places that are held during the above-described period." IN WITNESS WHEREOF, SUPERVISOR and PROVIDER have entered into this agreement on the first date above written. PROVIDER: By INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA SUPERVISOR OF ELECTIONS 176 Indian River County, Florida * ' MEMORANDUM 104` A r Indian River County Administration Complex 1801 27th Street Vero Beach, Florida 32960 indianriver.gov File ID: 25-1095 Type: Consent Staff Report Meeting Date: 11/18/2025 TO: The Honorable Board of County Commissioners THROUGH: John A. Titkanich, Jr., County Administrator THROUGH: Michael C. Zito, Deputy County Administrator Nancy Bunt, Assistant County Administrator Beth Powell, Parks, Recreation, & Conservation Director Kylie Yanchula, Natural Resources Director FROM: Wendy Swindell, Assistant Director, Parks, Recreation & Conservation DATE: November 5, 2025 SUBJECT: Draft Memorandum of Agreement Between the St. John's River Water Management District and Indian River County for Coastal Habitat Rehabilitation and Restoration BACKGROUND Indian River County maintains a long-term relationship with the St. John's River Water Management District (SJRWMD) on cooperative efforts for the restoration and management of coastal habitat. The Oslo Riverfront Conservation Area is one example of this effort. The SJRWMD is developing this Memorandum of Agreement in contemplation of entering into project agreements with counties bordering the Indian River Lagoon and currently plan to present a version of this MOA for Brevard County projects to their Governing Board on December 9, 2025. The purpose of this Draft MOA is to provide the Board with the general language and content of the document. The MOA serves to formalize agency cooperation between the SJRWMD and Indian River County (County) on performing impacted coastal habitat rehabilitation and restoration projects in and around coastal estuarine waters. Each Project will have a goal to restore, rehabilitate, or enhance coastal habitats providing additional ecosystem services/functions and enhancing resilience. The County would be entering into this MOA with the District to memorialize the terms and conditions under which the District shall assist in support of Projects. Attachment 1 includes a draft of the MOA; the MOA is the framework that guides the development of specific project agreements. While there is no set list of projects at this time, this work may include a broad scope of ventures, including wetland restoration, creation of living shorelines, and in -water work such as man-made reefs and breakwaters. ANALYSIS The general scope of work for projects will include (i) preconstruction activities; (ii) bidding and contractor Indian River County, Florida Page 1 of 2 Printed on 11/13/2025 pow lel/ f_egisttar,M selection; (iii) implementation/construction; and (iv) operation and management activities. However, the MOA acknowledges that the exact scope of each Project is unknown. Rather, the Parties will jointly identify feasible Projects and agree upon the division of resources needed to accomplish each individual Project. All Projects will be limited to those generally described in the Scope of Services/Work (Attachment A within the Draft MOA). When the District and the County agree upon a Project, a Project Agreement will be executed specifying each Party's obligations and expectations. Project Agreements may require one Party to perform the work identified, may require the other Party to fund said work, or may be a mix, wherein the Parties share the work and funding responsibilities. A Sample Project Agreement is presented in Attachment B of the Draft MOA. Nothing contained herein shall be construed as requiring a Party to execute a Project Agreement. Depending on the Project Agreement, either party may procure contractors to perform some or all of the work identified so long as the procurement follows competitive procurement protocols as set forth in the each agency's procurement policies. The MOA and all associated Project Agreements are at all times contingent upon funding availability, which may include a single source or multiple sources, including but not limited to: (1) ad valorem tax revenues appropriated by the District's Governing Board; (2) County funding through the various sources; (3) annual appropriations by the Florida Legislature, or (4) appropriations from other agencies or funding sources. BUDGETARYIMPACT There is no budgetary impact in the approval or execution of the MOA and supports funding partnerships for future Projects. Project Agreements with financial obligations will be brought to the Board separately for consideration and approval. POTENTIAL FUTURE BOARD ACTIONS Consideration of Project Agreements under the terms and conditions of the MOA for approval. STRATEGIC PLAN ALIGNMENT Quality of Life, Environment OTHER PLAN ALIGNMENT Lagoon Management Plan STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff respectfully recommend the Board authorize the County Attorney to work with the SJRWMD staff to develop a final Memorandum of Agreement Between the St. John's River Water Management District and Indian River County for cooperative project agreements to further coastal habitat rehabilitation and restoration projects in Indian River County, and authorize the County Administrator to execute the final MOA subject to review and approval by the County Attorney so long as there are no substantive changes to the draft MOA. Indian River County, Florida Page 2 of 2 Printed on 11/13/2025 powei(1tr Legistar"O Contract # XXXXX MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE ST. JOHNS RIVER WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT AND FOR COASTAL HABITAT REHABILITATION AND RESTORATION PROJECTS THIS MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT ("MOA") is entered into by and between the GOVERNING BOARD of the ST. JOHNS RIVER WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT ("DISTRICT"), whose address is 4049 Reid Street, Palatka, Florida, 32177, and a political subdivision of the State of Florida, whose address is , hereinafter referred to as the "Project Partner." The parties are hereafter referred to individually as a "Party," and collectively referred to as the "Parties." WITNESSETH THAT: WHEREAS, the District is a special taxing district created by the Florida Legislature and charged with the responsibility to administer and enforce Chapter 373, Florida Statutes (F.S.), and the rules promulgated thereunder; WHEREAS, the District is authorized under §373.083, F.S. to contract with public agencies, private corporations, or other persons; WHEREAS, the Project Partner is authorized by § 125.01(1)(p), F.S., to enter into agreements with other governmental agencies within or outside the boundaries of the Project Partner for the joint performance, or performance by one unit on behalf of the other, of any of either agency's authorized functions; WHEREAS, public agencies (including Project Partner and the District) are authorized by 163.01(14), F.S., to enter into contracts for the performance of service functions of [such] public agencies, but shall not be deemed to authorize the delegation of the constitutional or statutory duties of Project Partner or District officers. The Parties expressly deny any intent, expressed or implied, in this MOA to provide for a delegation by the District of such constitutional or statutory duties to the Project Partner; WHEREAS, the foregoing authorization for such agreements is granted to counties and cities for the purpose of permitting local governments to make the most efficient use of their powers by enabling them to cooperate with the other localities on a basis of mutual advantage and thereby to provide services and facilities in a manner and pursuant to forms of governmental organization that will accord best with geographic, economic, population, and other factors influencing the needs and development of local communities. § 163.01(2), F.S.; and WHEREAS, neither the Project Partner nor the District waives any defense of sovereign immunity beyond the limited waiver set forth §768.28, F.S., or consents to the increase the limits of its liability, upon entering into this MOA. This MOA does not contain any provision that requires one Party to indemnify or insure the other Party for the other Party's negligence, or to assume any liability for the other Party's negligence. Page 1 of 20 179 Contract # XXXXX NOW THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the foregoing premises and mutual understandings of the Parties, the Parties agree as follows: 1. RECITALS. The above recitals are true and correct and are incorporated by reference. 2. PURPOSE OF THE MOA. The purpose of this MOA is to formalize multi -agency cooperation on performing impacted coastal habitat rehabilitation and restoration projects ("Project(s)") in and around coastal estuarine waters. Each Project will have a goal to restore, rehabilitate, or enhance coastal habitats providing additional ecosystem services/functions and enhancing resilience. The Parties are entering into this MOA to memorialize the terms and cond tions under which the District shall assist in support of the Projects. 3. TERM. This MOA is effective the date the last of the Parties has executed this MOA and, shall continue for a period of three (3) years unless otherwise terminated in accordance with the terms of this MOA. This MOA may be renewed for one or more additional three (3) year terms with the mutual written agreement of the Parties. 4. TERMINATION. This MOA may be terminated by either Party upon a material breach by the other Party of its obligations hereunder upon thirty (30) days prior written notice to the breaching Party and the failure of the breaching Party to cure the breach within such thirty (30) day period. Either Party may terminate this MOA without cause by providing ninety (90) days prior written notice to the other Party. Each Project Agreement (discussed herein) may be terminated as provided therein. EFFECT OF TERMINATION. Upon the termination of this Agreement, the underlying Project Agreements shall also terminate. On termination, the obligations of the Parties under this Agreement shall end, and neither Party shall have a claim, including any claim for termination damages, against the other; provided, however, that any provisions evidently intended to have a continuing effect shall survive termination of this Agreement. 6. SCOPE OF SERVICES/WORK. A. Scope of Projects. The general scope of the Projects is as follows: (i) preconstruction activities; (ii) bidding and contractor selection; (iii) implementation/construction; and (iv) operation and management activities. However, the Parties acknowledge that the exact scope of each Project is unknown. Rather, the Parties will jointly identify feasible Projects and agree upon the division of resources needed to accomplish each individual Project. All Projects will be limited to that generally described in the Scope of Services/Work attached hereto as Exhibit A. B. Project Agreements. When the Parties agree upon a Project, the Parties will execute a Project Agreement specifying each Party's obligations and expectations. Project Agreements may require one Party to perform the work identified, may require the other Party to fund said work, or may be a mix, wherein the Parties share the work and funding responsibilities. A Sample Project Agreement is attached hereto as Attachment B. Nothing contained herein shall be construed as requiring a Party to execute a Project Agreement. Page 2 of 20 180 C. Contractors. Either Parry may procure contractors to perform some or all of the work identified in the Project Agreement so long as the procurement follows competitive procurement protocols as set forth in the Party's procurement policies. D. Performance Monitoring. During the execution of any Project authorized by this MOA or associated Project Agreement, the Parties shall have the right to inspect the operation of the Project and any data pertaining to performance of the Project during normal business hours upon reasonable prior notice. 7. COMPENSATION. A. Expenditure/Revenue. The Parties anticipate that some Projects may require expenditures solely by one Party or may require cost sharing expenditures by both Parties. Thus, some Projects will result in revenue to the Project Partner and other Projects will result in revenue to the District. B. Grant Funding. The Parties anticipate that certain Projects maybe grant funded. For grant funded Projects, the Parties agree to perform the associated Project Agreements in accordance with the funding source requirements. C. Funding Contingency. This MOA and all associated Project Agreements are at all times contingent upon funding availability, which may include a single source or multiple sources, including but not limited to: (1) ad valorem tax revenues appropriated by the District's Governing Board or the Project Partner's governing body; (2) annual appropriations by the Florida Legislature, or (3) appropriations from other agencies or funding sources. For District funded projects: agreements that extend for a period of more than one Fiscal Year are subject to annual appropriation of funds in the sole discretion and judgment of the District's Governing Board for each succeeding Fiscal Year. Should the Project not be funded, in whole or in part, in the current Fiscal Year or succeeding Fiscal Years, the District shall so notify Project Partner and the applicable Project Agreement shall be deemed terminated for convenience five days after receipt of such notice, or within such additional time as the District may allow. For the purpose of this Agreement, "Fiscal Year" is defined as the period beginning on October 1 and ending on September 30. D. Lobbying Expenditures. Pursuant to §216.347, Fla. Stat., as amended, the Parties agree that no funds received under this MOA or associated Project Agreement may be used for the purpose of lobbying the Legislature or any other state agency. 8. NO PLEDGE OF AD VALOREM TAXES. The Parties agree that this MOA does not constitute a general indebtedness of either Party within the meaning of any constitutional, statutory, or charter provision of limitation and it is expressly agreed by the Parties that the one Party shall not have the right to require or compel the exercise of ad valorem taxing power of the other Party, or taxation of any real or personal property therein for payment of any monetary obligations due under the terms of this MOA. It is further agreed that this MOA and any funds called for to be paid hereunder shall not constitute a lien upon any real or personal property, any part thereof, and that the obligation for monetary payments called for to be made hereunder shall be deemed to exist for less than a year at any point in time and shall be entirely subject to the legislative budgetary discretion of the District and the Project Partner. Page 3 of 20 181 Contract # XXXXX 9. NON -WAIVER OF REGULATORY POWERS. Nothing contained in this MOA shall be construed as a waiver of or contract with respect to the regulatory and permitting authority of the District or the Project Partner under applicable laws rules, and regulations. 10. NON -WAIVER OF SOVEREIGN IMMUNITY. Each Party to this MOA expressly retains all rights, benefits and immunities of sovereign immunity that they presently enjoy under the Constitution and Statutes of the State of Florida, and particularly with respect to Chapter 768, Florida Statutes. Notwithstanding anything set forth in any Article of this MOA to the contrary, nothing in this MOA shall be deemed as a waiver of immunity or limits of liability of either Party beyond any statutory limited waiver of immunity or limits of liability which may have been adopted by the Florida Legislature or may be adopted by the Florida Legislature and any liability of either Party for damages shall not exceed the statutory limits of liability, regardless of the number or nature of any claim which may arise including but not limited to a claim sounding in tort, equity or contract. Nothing in this MOA shall inure to the benefit of any third party for the purpose of allowing any claim against any Party, which would otherwise be barred under the Doctrine of Sovereign Immunity or by operation of law. 11. LIABILITY AND INSURANCE. Each Party is responsible for all personal injury and property damage attributable to the negligent acts or omissions of that Party, its officers, employees, and agents. Nothing contained herein shall be construed or interpreted as denying to any Party any remedy or defense available under the laws of the state of Florida. Each Party shall acquire and maintain throughout the term of this MOA such liability, workers' compensation, and automobile insurance, which may include participation in a self-insurance program, as required by its current rules and regulations. Each Party shall bear the cost of maintaining its own insurance coverages. Any specific insurance requirements pertaining to a Party's contractors shall be set forth in the terms of the associated Project Agreement. 12. DISPUTE RESOLUTION. The Parties to this MOA shall exercise their best efforts to negotiate and settle promptly any dispute that may arise with respect to this MOA in accordance with the provisions set forth in this Article. The District and the Project Partner Project Managers shall use reasonable efforts to arrange personal meetings and/or telephone conferences as needed, at mutually convenient times and places, to address and work toward resolution of issues that arise in performance of this MOA and any applicable Project Agreement. Issues shall be escalated to successive management levels as needed. A. Informal Dispute Resolution. If a dispute develops between the Parties concerning any provision of this MOA, or the interpretation thereof, or any conduct by the other Party under these agreements, and the Parties are unable to resolve such dispute within five (5) days, that Party, known as the Invoking Party, through its applicable Project Manager, shall promptly bring the disputed matter to the attention of the non -invoking Party's Project Manager or designated representative, as the case may be, of the other Party in writing ("Dispute Notice") in order to resolve such dispute. Upon issuance of a Dispute Notice, the Project Managers or designated representative shall furnish to each other all non -privileged information with respect to the dispute believed by them to be appropriate and germane. The Project Managers shall negotiate in an effort to Page 4 of 20 182 Contract # XXXXX resolve the dispute without the necessity of any formal proceeding. If such dispute is not resolved by the Project Managers or designated representative within five (5) work days, the Project Managers shall escalate the dispute to their superiors. B. Formal Dispute Resolution. At any point after issuance of a Dispute Notice under this Article, either Party may initiate formal non-binding mediation before a single mediator, which mediation shall be completed within thirty (30) days of initiation, in accordance with the rules of practice and procedure adopted by the Supreme Court of Florida for court- ordered mediation, Rule 1.700 et seq. of the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure, and Chapter 44, Florida Statutes. If the dispute remains unresolved after conducting such mediation, then either Party may proceed to finalize such termination remedies and commence litigation in a court of competent jurisdiction. Each Party shall bear its own costs and attorney's fees for mediation or arbitration of an issue arising under this MOA. 13. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTORS. The Parties are independent contractors under this MOA. In providing services hereunder, neither Party nor its agents shall act as officers, employees, or agents of the other Party. No partnership, joint venture, or other joint relationship is created hereby. Neither Party extends to the other, or its agents any authority of any kind to bind the Party in any respect whatsoever. 14. THIRD PARTY BENEFICIARIES. Neither the District nor the Project Partner intends to directly or substantially benefit a third party by this MOA. The Parties expressly acknowledge that it is not their intent to create any rights or obligations in any third person or entity under this MOA. Therefore, the Parties agree that there are no third party beneficiaries to this MOA and that no third party shall be entitled to assert a claim against either of them based upon this MOA, except as otherwise provided in this MOA. 15. PROJECT MANAGEMENT/NOTICES. The Project Managers listed below shall be responsible for overall coordination and management of the Work. Either Party may change its Project Manager upon three business days' prior written notice to the other Party. Written notice of change of address shall be provided within five business days. All notices shall be in writing to the Project Managers at the addresses below and shall be sent by one of the following methods: (1) hand delivery; (2) U.S. certified mail; (3) national overnight courier; or (4) email. Notices via certified mail are deemed delivered upon receipt. Notices via overnight courier are deemed delivered one business day after having been deposited with the courier. Notices via email are deemed delivered on the date transmitted and received. In the case of Project Partner: with a copy of legal notices to: Attn: , Project Manager Attn: Attorney Address: Address: Phone: -- Phone: _-- Email: Email: In the case of the District: with a copy of legal notices to: Page 5 of 20 183 Contract # XXXXX Attn: Ronald E. Brockmeyer, Jr., M.S., Attn: Erin Preston, General Counsel FCCM Address: P.O. Box 1429 Project Manager Palatka, FL 32178-1429 Address: P.O. Box 1429 Phone: 386-3294176 Palatka, FL 32178-1429 Email: epreston(a-sirwmd.com Phone: 386-329-4495 Email: rbrockmeyer(a),sjrwmd.com 16. INVOICES — DISTRICT PAYMENT. The following provisions apply to all invoices for District funding: A. Project Partner shall submit an invoice for the amounts set forth in the applicable Project Agreement. Any funds that have not been expended upon the termination of the applicable Project Agreement will be returned to the District. The invoice can be submitted either (1) by email to acctpay@sjrwrnd.com (preferred) or (2) by mail to the St. Johns River Water Management District, Finance Director, 4049 Reid Street, Palatka, Florida 32177-2571. B. End of District Fiscal Year Reporting. The District's fiscal year ends on September 30. Irrespective of the invoicing frequency, the District is required to account for all encumbered funds at that time. When authorized under an associated Project Agreement, submittal of an invoice for Work completed as of September 30 satisfies this requirement. The invoice shall be submitted no later than October 30. If the Project Agreement does not authorize submittal of an invoice for Work completed as of September 30, Project Partner shall submit, prior to October 30, a description of the additional work on the Project completed between the last invoice and September 30, and an estimate of the additional amount due as of September 30 for such Work. If there have been no prior invoices, Project Partner shall submit a description of the work completed on the Project through September 30 and a statement estimating the dollar value of that work as of September 30. C. All invoices shall include the following information: (1) District contract number for the applicable Project Agreement; (2) Project Partner's name, address, and authorization to directly deposit payment into Project Partner's account (if Project Partner has not yet provided the District with a completed Direct Deposit Authorization form); (3) Project Partner's invoice number and date of invoice; (4) District Project Manager; (5) Project Partner's Project Manager; (6) supporting documentation as to cost and/or Project completion (as per the cost schedule and other requirements of the Statement of Work); and (7) Progress Report (if required). Project Partner should not include its Federal Employer Identification Number (FEIN) or its Social Security Number on the invoices. Invoices that do not correspond with this paragraph shall be returned without action within 20 business days of receipt, stating the basis for rejection. Payments shall be made within 45 days of receipt of an approved invoice. D. Travel expenses. If the cost schedule for this Agreement includes a line item for travel expenses, travel expenses shall be drawn from the project budget and are not otherwise compensable. If travel expenses are not included in the cost schedule, they are a cost of Page 6 of 20 184 Contract # X XXXX providing the service that is borne by Project Partner and are only compensable when specifically approved by the District as an authorized District traveler. In such instance, travel expenses must be submitted on District or State of Florida travel forms and shall be paid pursuant to District Administrative Directive 391. E. Payments withheld. The District may withhold or, on account of subsequently discovered evidence, nullify, in whole or in part, any payment to such an extent as may be necessary to protect the District from loss as a result of: (1) defective work not remedied; (2) failure to maintain adequate progress in the Project; or (3) any other material breach of this Agreement. Amounts withheld shall not be considered due and shall not be paid until all grounds for withholding payment have been remedied. F. Annual budgetary limitation. For multi -fiscal year agreements, the District must budget the amount of funds that will be expended during each fiscal year as accurately as possible. The Project Agreement includes the parties' current schedule for completion of the Work and projection of expenditures on a fiscal year basis (October 1 — September 30) ("Annual Spending Plan"). If Project Parter anticipates that expenditures will exceed the budgeted amount during any fiscal year, Project Partner shall promptly notify the District's Project Manager and provide a proposed revised work schedule and Annual Spending Plan that provides for completion of the Work without increasing the Total Compensation. The last date for the District to receive this request is August 1 of the then -current fiscal year. The District may in its sole discretion prepare a District Supplemental Instruction Form incorporating the revised work schedule and Annual Spending Plan during the then -current fiscal year or subsequent fiscal year(s). 17. INVOICES — PROJECT PARTNER PAYMENT. The following provisions apply to all invoices for Project Partner funding: [to be added by Project Partner] 18. ASSIGNMENT AND PERFORMANCE. Neither Party may assign or otherwise convey its rights and/or obligations under this MOA without first securing the other Party's prior written consent, which consent may be withheld, limited and/or conditioned in other's sole discretion. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Parties may procure the services of outside providers to perform the work of Project Agreements. Nothing herein shall preclude the right of either Party to waive its rights under this Article but no waiver shall be granted by either Party without amendment to this MOA. 19. AUDIT RIGHT AND RETENTION OF RECORDS. Either Party shall have the right to audit the books, records, and accounts of the others and its contractors and subcontractors that are related to this MOA. The Parties and their contractors and subcontractors shall keep such books, records, and accounts as may be necessary in order to record complete and correct entries related to this MOA. 20. CERTIFICATION. In accordance with §§287.133, 287.134, and 287.135, Fla. Stat., each Party certifies that it has not been, is not now, and during the term of this MOA will not be (a) Page 7 of 20 185 Contract # XXXXX placed on the Scrutinized Companies or Other Entities that Boycott Israel (§287.135, Fla. Stat.), Discriminatory (§287.134, Fla. Stat.), or Convicted (§287.133, Fla. Stat.) lists, (b) engaged in a Boycott of Israel (§287.135, Fla. Stat.), or (c) engaged in business operations in Cuba or Syria (§287.135, Fla. Stat.). Further, each Party acknowledges that pursuant to the respective statutes, a Party may terminate this MOA at its sole option if the other Party is found to have submitted a false certification or if the certification proves to be untrue during the term of this MOA. 21. COMMON CARRIER. Pursuant to §908.111, Fla. Stat., the District may not execute, amend, or renew a contract with a common carrier or contracted carrier, if the carrier is willfully providing any service in furtherance of transporting a person into the State of Florida with knowledge that the person is an unauthorized alien, except to facilitate the detention, removal, or departure of a the person from the state or the U.S. Pursuant to §908.111, Fla. Stat., Contractor shall complete Attachment C, the Common Carrier or Contracted Carrier Attestation. 22. TIME OF THE ESSENCE. Time is of the essence for all work or services performed throughout this MOA. 23. FORCE MAJEURE. Neither Party shall be liable for any failure or delay in the performance of its obligations under this MOA to the extent resulting from force majeure, including, but not limited to, compliance with any government law or regulation, acts of God, act or omissions of the other Party, government acts or omissions, fires, strikes, natural disasters, wars, riots, transportation problems, and/or any other cause whatsoever beyond the reasonable control of the Parties (an such cause being referred to as a "Force Majeure Event"). Accordingly, the Parties further agree that: A. Upon the occurrence of Force Majeure Event, the non-performing Party shall be excused from any further performance of those obligations under this MOA affected by the Force Majeure Event for as long as (a) the Force Majeure Event continues; and (b) the non- performing Party continues to use commercially reasonable efforts, to again commence performance whenever and to whatever extent possible without delay. B. Upon the occurrence of a Force Majeure Event, the non-performing Party shall notify the other Party within two (2) work days of the failure, or as soon as possible after such failure or delay if the Force Majeure Event prevents compliance within two (2) work days, of the occurrence of a Force Majeure Event and shall describe in reasonable detail the nature of the Force Majeure Event. C. In the event of a Force Majeure Event, the time for performance by the Parties under the applicable Project Agreement shall be extended for a period of time equal to the time lost by reason of such cause through execution of a Change Order pursuant to the terms of this MOA and the impacted Project Agreement. 24. WAIVER OF BREACH AND MATERIALITY. Failure to enforce any provision of this MOA shall not be deemed a waiver of such provision or modification of this MOA. A waiver Page 8 of 20 186 Contract # XXXXX of any breach of a provision of this MOA shall not be deemed a waiver of any subsequent breach and shall not be construed to be a modification of the terms of this MOA. 25. PUBLIC RECORDS QUESTIONS CONTACT. IF PROJECT PARTNER HAS QUESTIONS REGARDING THE APPLICATION OF CHAPTER 119, FLORIDA STATUTES, TO PROJECT PARTNER'S DUTY TO PROVIDE PUBLIC RECORDS RELATING TO THIS AGREEMENT, CONTACT THE DISTRICT'S CUSTODIAN OF PUBLIC RECORDS AT: DISTRICT CLERK ST. JOHNS RIVER WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT 4049 REID STREET, PALATKA, FLORIDA 32177-2571 (386) 3294127 CLERK(a,SJRWMD.COM IF DISTRICT HAS QUESTIONS REGARDING THE APPLICATION OF CHAPTER 119, FLORIDA STATUTES, TO DISTRICT'S DUTY TO PROVIDE PUBLIC RECORDS RELATING TO THIS AGREEMENT, CONTACT THE PROJECT PARTNER'S CUSTODIAN OF PUBLIC RECORDS AT: PROJECT PARTNER ATTN. PUBLIC RECORDS CUSTODIAN 26. COMPLIANCE WITH LAWS. Each Party shall comply with all federal, state, and local laws, codes, ordinances, rules, and regulations in performing its duties, responsibilities, and obligations related to this MOA. The Parties shall include this requirement in all subcontracts pertaining to this MOA and associated Project Agreements. Each Party performing work under an associated Project Agreement shall obtain any and all governmental permits necessary to implement the project. Any activity not properly permitted prior to implementation or completed without proper permits does not comply with this MOA and shall not be approved for project funding under an associated Project Agreement. 27. CHANGES DUE TO PUBLIC WELFARE. The Project Partner and the District agree to enter into good faith negotiations regarding modifications to this MOA, which may be required in order to implement changes in the interest of the public welfare or due to change in law. 28. SEVERANCE. In the event this MOA or a portion of this MOA is found by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, the remaining provisions shall continue to be effective unless the Project Partner or the District elect to terminate this MOA. The election to terminate Page 9 of 20 187 this MOA based upon this provision shall be made within seven (7) days after the finding by the court becomes final. 29. ENTIRE AGREEMENT. This MOA contains the entire agreement between the District and the Project Partner pertaining to matters contained herein. Any modifications to this MOA shall not be binding unless in writing and signed by both Parties. 30. APPLICABLE LAW AND WAIVER OF JURY TRIAL. This MOA shall be interpreted and construed in accordance with and governed by the laws of the state of Florida. By entering into this MOA, the District and the Project Partner hereby expressly waive any rights either Party may have to a trial by jury of any civil litigation related to this MOA. Each Party agrees to bear its own costs and attorney's fees relating to any dispute arising under this MOA. 31. AMENDMENTS. No modification, change order, amendment, or alteration in the terms or conditions contained herein shall be effective unless contained in a written document prepared with the same or similar formality as this MOA and executed by the Project Partner and the District. 32. PRIOR AGREEMENTS. This document represents the final and complete understanding of the Parties and incorporates or supersedes all prior negotiations, correspondence, conversations, agreements, and understandings applicable to the matters contained herein. The Parties agree that there is no commitment, agreement, or understanding concerning the subject matter of this MOA that is not contained in this written document. Accordingly, the Parties agree that no deviation from the terms hereof shall be predicated upon any prior representation or agreement, whether oral or written. 33. CONSTRUCTION OF AGREEMENTS. This MOA and any associated Project Agreements shall not be construed more strictly against one Party than against the other merely by virtue of the fact that it may have been prepared by one of the Parties, it being recognized that both Parties have contributed substantially and materially to the preparation hereof. 34. SURVIVAL All provisions of this MOA which impose or contemplate continuing obligations on a Party shall survive the expiration or termination of this MOA. [Remainder of page intentionally left blank. Signature page follows] Page 10 of 20 188 Contract # XXXXX IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties to this Memorandum of Agreement have caused the same to be signed by their duly authorized representatives on the dates indicated below. ST. JOHNS RIVER WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT By: Name: Mary Ellen Winkler, J.D. Title: Assistant Executive Director Dated: Project Partner By:_ Name: Title: Dated: Page 11 of 20 It -III ATTACHMENT A SCOPE OF SERVICES/WORK Coastal Habitat Restoration and Rehabilitation I. BACKGROUND Contract # XXXXX Coastal habitats perform a vast array of ecosystem functions. These functions (ecological services) include providing food that supports biological productivity and diversity; serving as habitats for species that support fisheries; attenuating or dissipating waves; controlling erosion; purifying water by sequestering nutrients, pollutants, and sediments; sequestering carbon; and providing aesthetic and recreational value. Appropriately, rehabilitation or restoration of impacted coastal habitats has been a high priority management goal since the District started its work in coastal systems. It was included in the Indian River Lagoon (1RL) Field Committee Report to the Governor (1986), IRL Joint Reconnaissance Report (Chapter 6, 1987), IRL Surface Water Improvement and Management (SWIM) Plan and its updates (1988, 1989, 1994, 2003), the Northern Coastal Basins (NCB) SWIM Plan (2003, 2016 draft), and the National Estuary Program's IRL Comprehensive Conservation and Management Plan and its updates (1996, 2008, 2019). It is currently one of the key efforts in the District resilience planning to enhance coastal resilience. There are four main types of impacted coastal habitats commonly targeted for rehabilitation or restoration: impounded wetlands, wetlands impacted by dragline ditching, wetlands altered by dredging or filling, and degraded oyster reefs. In addition to these efforts, the creation of "living shorelines", represents an integrated approach that combines restoration with shoreline protection. Rather than using hard infrastructure like bulkheads or riprap, living shorelines stabilize eroding or disturbed shorelines by establishing submergent and/or emergent wetland habitat along the shoreline. Another key challenge to wetland resilience involved areas that have not kept pace with relative sea level rise and can no longer support coastal wetland vegetation. In such cases, restoration techniques exist to raise the surface elevation and reestablish functional vegetated wetlands. Most projects of this type do not require ongoing operation and maintenance efforts once constructed as the restored ecosystem provides ongoing activities such as sediment capture, and carbon sequestration that create sustainable benefits. The District has successfully implemented projects across all of these restoration categories (Brockmeyer et al. 1997, 2021). Achieving large-scale project outcomes necessitates broad stakeholder engagement and the integration of varied financial, technical, and institutional resources. The complexity of land management and ownership, and jurisdictional authority across impacted wetlands led the District to establish successful partnerships that support coordinated remediation efforts and ensure alignment with the ecological goals outlined in relevant plans and initiatives. Furthermore, these partnerships have leveraged significant cost -share dollars, grant funds, and in-kind services; thus, multiplying the District's investment several -fold and achieving large-scale wetland rehabilitation. With our long history of work in coastal systems, we are in an excellent position to lead efforts toward resilience and sustainability of wetlands and other coastal habitats. Public ownership of the impacted wetland system can facilitate their rehabilitation or restoration. The acquisition and management of coastal wetlands with an emphasis on disturbed areas, has been one of the District's long-standing goals. Collaboration with other governmental entities has been critical to many of these successful projects. Page 12 of 20 190 Contract # XXXXX H. OBJECTIVE The overall intent of this MOA is to facilitate rehabilitation or restoration of impacted coastal habitats (including impoundments) within the coastal systems. III. SCOPE OF WORK Over the term of this MOA, Project Agreements issued hereunder will implement Projects that restore, rehabilitate, or enhance coastal habitats providing additional ecosystem services/functions and enhancing resilience. IV. TASK IDENTIFICATION Detailed tasks for each implementation Project initiated under this MOA will be jointly defined by the Parties and enumerated in each Project Agreement. VI. BUDGET / COST SCHEDULE Each Project Agreement will include specific budget details, address spending authority, and a project timeline. Project costs, including matching funds and/or in-kind services, will be established by mutual agreement of the Parties and detailed in writing in each Project Agreement. The Project schedule will be jointly established by Project Managers for each Party and stated in each Project Agreement. This schedule shall include Project implementation milestones, invoicing, and Project completion. These Project Agreements will persist until a Party or all Parties terminate. Related Literature Brockmeyer, R.E., editor. 2004. Optimizing IRL wetland habitat restoration and management: The IRL Wetlands Initiative. Submitted to EPA as the Final Report for agreement #CD984814-99-0, 247 p. + appendices. Brockmeyer, R.E., Jr., J.R. Rey, R.W. Virnstein, R.G. Gilmore, and L. Earnest. 1997. Rehabilitation of impounded estuarine wetlands by hydrologic reconnection to the Indian River Lagoon, Florida. Wetlands Ecology and Management 4(2):93-109. Brockmeyer RE, Donnelly M, Rey JR, Carlson DB. 2021. Manipulating, managing and rehabilitating mangrove -dominated wetlands along Florida's east coast (USA): balancing mosquito control and ecological values. Wetl Ecol Manag. https://doi.org/10.1007/s 11273-021-09843-3. Cahoon Jr, D. R., & Cowan Jr, J. H. 1988. Environmental impacts and regulatory policy implications of spray disposal of dredged material in Louisiana wetlands. Coastal Management 16(4): 341-362. Donnelly MJ, Walters L, Shaffer M. 2018. Shoreline characterization for northern Indian River Lagoon and Mosquito Lagoon. CEELAB Research Data. Orlando, FL: University of Central Florida. https:Hstars.library.ucf.edu/ceelab-researchdata/l, accessed March 2022. Page 13 of 20 191 Contract # XXXXX Ford, M. A., Cahoon, D. R., & Lynch, J. C. 1999. Restoring marsh elevation in a rapidly subsiding salt marsh by thin -layer deposition of dredged material. Ecol. Eng. 12(3):189- 205. Gilmore, R.G., Cooke, D.W, and Donohoe, C.J. 1982. A comparison of the fish populations and habitat in open and closed salt marsh impoundments in east -central FL. NE Gulf Sci. 5: 25-37. Grizzle R, Adams J, Walters L. 2002. Historical changes in intertidal oyster (C. virginica) reefs in a FL lagoon potentially related to boating activities. J Shellfish Res 21:749-756. Haydt, P.J., and D Frazel. 2003. Northern Coastal Basins SWIM Plan. St. Johns River Water Management District, Palatka, FL. Indian River Lagoon Field Committee. 1986. The Interagency Management Committee Report to the Governor with Recommendations for Resource Management in the Indian River Lagoon. Recommendations to Regional and Local Governments and Marine Resources Council of East Central Florida. Indian River Lagoon National Estuary Program. 1996. The Indian River Lagoon Comprehensive Conservation and Management Plan. Melbourne, FL, pp. 350. Indian River Lagoon National Estuary Program. 2008. The Indian River Lagoon Comprehensive Conservation and Management Plan Update. Palm Bay, FL. Parkinson, R.W., DeLaune, R.R., Hutcherson, C.T., & Stewart, J. 2006. Tuning surface water management and wetland restoration programs with historic sediment accumulation rates: Merritt Island National Wildlife Refuge, East-Central Florida, USA. Journal of Coastal Research 22(5):1268-1277. Rey, J.R., D.B. Carlson, and R.E. Brockmeyer, Jr. 2012. Coastal wetland management in Florida: environmental concerns and human health. Wetlands Eco. and Manag. 20(3) 197-211 St. Johns River Water Management District and South Florida Water Management District. 1988. Interim SWIM Plan for the Indian River Lagoon. August, 1988. Palatka and West Palm Beach, Florida. 70 pp. St. Johns River Water Management District and South Florida Water Management District. 1989. SWIM Plan for the Indian River Lagoon. Palatka and West Palm Beach, Florida. Page 14 of 20 192 Contract # XXXXX ATTACHMENT B — SAMPLE PROJECT AGREEMENT ST. JOHNS RIVER WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT Coastal Habitat Rehabilitation and Restoration Project Agreement This Project Agreement is entered into between the Parties named below, pursuant to section 163.01(14), Fla. Stat. and the Memorandum of Agreement MOA referenced below: Memorandum of Agreement between the St. Johns River Water Management District and for Coastal Habitats Rehabilitation and Restoration Projects (Contract # xxxxx) The terms and conditions of the MOA are hereby incorporated into this Project Agreement. In the event of a conflict, the terms of this Project Agreement shall be given precedence over the MOA. The terms of this Project Agreement may be modified only through a written amendment executed by both Parties. A 1. Parties: St. Johns River Water Management C k o t h r to 4049 Reid Street Palatka, FL 32177 R textect� ' le: Crck orlt�p hl r to fin er \\CN&ac�: t1Click or tap hereto enter ter text. Project Descrifkion: C(id* o)-ta� here to enter text. A man of the Proi`ect--a— pis attached as Exhibit XX. 3. Project Agreement Term: Effective Date: The later of Click or tap to Expiration Date: Click or tap to enter a enter a date. or the date both Parties execute date. the Project Agreement. Page 15 of 20 193 Contract # XXXXX This Project Agreement can be terminated under the same mechanisms set forth in Article 4 of the MOA. 4. Project Funding: ExceedNot to Amount Source $ Click or tap here to enter ❑ District ❑ Project Partner text. $ Click or tap here to enter ❑ District ❑ Project Partner text. $ Click or tap here to enter ❑ District ❑ Project Partner text. Funding shall be reimbursed to the Funding Recipient for satisfactory completion of the Project. 5. Funding Recipient: All Project Tasks as set forth below are to be completed by the Party indicated below, who shall be the recipient of the Project Funding: ❑ District❑ Partner The Funding Recipient shall submit invoices in accordance with Articles 16 & 17 of the MOA and as outlined in the Statement of Work. Except as provided in paragraph 4 above, the Funding Recipient shall provide and pay for all materials, labor, and other facilities and equipment necessary for the performance of the Project. Upon the other Party's written request, the Funding Recipient shall submit written progress reports to the other Party. The progress reports shall provide an updated progress schedule, taking into account all delays and proved changes in the Project. Failure to provide a progress report will be cause to withhold payment. 6. Insurance Requirements. The Funding Recipient shall require its contractors, if any, to maintain insurance coverage of such types and with such terms and limits as described below throughout the term of this Project Agreement. The Funding Recipient shall require all subcontractors, if any, to make compliance with the insurance requirements of this Project Agreement a condition of all contracts that are related to this Project Agreement. The cost of acquiring insurance coverages and payments of deductibles are not reimbursable costs under this Project Agreement. Receipt of Certificates of Insurance indicating less coverage than required does not constitute a waiver of the Insurance Requirements. Page 16 of 20 194 Contract # XXXXX General Liability policy shall include Endorsement CG 2010 0413, or equivalent, naming the Parties as Additional Insured. All required policies shall include: (1) endorsement that waives any right of subrogation (Endorsement CG 24 04 05 09, or equivalent) against the Parties for any policy of insurance provided under this requirement or under any state or federal worker's compensation or employer's liability act; (2) endorsement to give the Parties no less than 30 days' notice in the event of cancellation or material change. Certificates of Insurance must be accompanied by copies of the requested endorsements. Any deductibles or self-insured retentions above $100,000 must be declared to and approved by the Parties. Approval will not be unreasonably withheld. Subcontractor is responsible for any deductible or self-insured retention. Insurance must be placed with insurers having an A.M. Best rating of A-V or greater. Receipt of insurance certificates providing less than the required coverage does not waive these insurance requirements. (a) Workers' Compensation Insurance. Workers' compensation and employer's liability coverage, including maritime workers' compensation, if applicable, in not less than the minimum limits required by Florida law. If Subcontractor claims an exemption from workers' compensation coverage, Subcontractor must provide a copy of the Certificate of Exemption from the Florida Division of Workers' Compensation for all officers of a corporation or members of an LLC claiming exemption who will be participating in the work. In addition, Subcontractor must provide a completed District "Affidavit (Non -Construction)" for non -construction contracts. (b) General Liability. Commercial General Liability Insurance on an "Occurrence Basis," with limits of liability for each occurrence of not less than $2,000,000 for personal injury, bodily injury, and property damage, with a(n) project aggregate of $4,000,000. Coverage shall include: (1) contractual liability, (2) perils generally known as XCU (explosion, collapse, and underground property damage), subsidence, absolute earth movement (excepts as it pertains to earthquake peril only) or any equivalent peril, (3) products and completed operations, (4) independent contractors, and (5) property in the care, control, or custody of Subcontractor. Extensions shall be added or exclusions deleted to provide the necessary coverage. (c) Automobile Liability. $500,000 combined single limit. (d) Umbrella Policy. Minimum limits of $2,000,000 per occurrence. (e) Pollution Liability Policy. Minimum limits of $1,000,000 per occurrence. Page 17 of 20 195 Contract # XXXXX 7. Project Management: Name: Ronald E. Brockmeyer, Jr. Name: Click or tap here to enter text. Address: P.O. Box 1429 Palatka, FL 32178-1429 Address: Click or tap here to enter text. Phone: (386) 329-4495 Phone: Click or tap here to enter text. Email: rbrockmeyer@sjrwmd.com Email: Click or tap here to enter text. 8. Project Tasks. As part of this Agreement, the Parties agree to complete the following tasks (refer to Statement of Work for further description): 9. Special Conditions. Add any Project -specific special conditions, such as property access or grant requirements. Page 18 of 20 196 ❑ District ❑ Project Partner ❑ District ❑ Project Partner ❑ District ❑ Project Partner ❑ District ❑ Project Partner ❑ District ❑ Project Partner ❑ District ❑ Project Partner ❑ District ❑ Project Partner ❑ District ❑ Project Partner ❑ District ❑ Project Partner ❑ District ❑ Project Partner ❑ District ❑ Project Partner ❑ District ❑ Project Partner ❑ District ❑ Project Partner 9. Special Conditions. Add any Project -specific special conditions, such as property access or grant requirements. Page 18 of 20 196 Contract # XXXXX IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have caused this Project Agreement to be executed on the date written below by their duly authorized representatives. This Project Agreement may be executed in separate counterparts, which shall not affect its validity. Upon execution, this Project Agreement constitutes the entire agreement between the Parties and cannot be changed by any means other than written amendments referencing this Project Agreement and signed by both Parties. Party I:A (Authorized Signature or Designee) Print Name and Title of Signor Party I:A (Authorized Signature or Designee) Print Name and Title of Signor Page 19 of 20 Date Signed Date Signed 197 Contract # XXXXX ATTACHMENT C - COMMON CARRIER OR CONTRACTED CARRIER ATTESTATION FORM This form must be completed by Project Partner, . Capitalized terms used herein have the definitions ascribed in §908.111, F.S. Project Partner acknowledges that the District may terminate this Agreement upon receipt of knowledge or information that Project Partner is a carrier with which the District is prohibited from contracting with under §908.111, F.S. Project Partner (check one statement below): Is not a Common Carrier or contracted carrier and this Agreement does not involve common carrier or contracted carrier services. OR Is a Common Carrier or contracted carrier and is not willfully providing and will not willfully provide any service during the Agreement term in furtherance of transporting a person into this state knowing that the person is an Unauthorized Alien, except to facilitate the detention, removal, or departure of the person from this state or the United States. Under penalties of perjury, I declare that I have read the foregoing statement and that the facts stated in it are true. Printed Name: Title: Signature: Page 20 of 20 198 Indian River County, Florida * * MEMORANDUM �lORiOy' File ID: 25-1097 Type: Constitutional Officers & Other Govt. TO: Honorable Board of County Commissioners 10.A. Indian River County Administration Complex 1801 27th Street Vero Beach, Florida 32960 indianriver.gov Meeting Date: 11/18/2025 ited on 11/13/2025 owe OO( L,egistarn" Dear Joe, Enclosed you will find a copy of our Annual Report for the year ending September 30, 2025. Sincere Mar" .�� Community D*v. `mere. Services General Sari Human:, on Pubik Rerreotion Utilities Services 1800 27* S"O, BulkfinQ 8 Other 200 0 N r t v' d N E r v a o o .!4 Ou M v > wil ` c y a m o v a t ti at Q � c a m � C - 6 a u o co co a > E E o got m tE- ... d > ... .. .. m a v m n - iA w of u �► w Vi- .: - - ds #tei m in: M 40 4A- - U► :... ..n Q IA o `a N w w V! iA 1Rk N 4i, w w v► 46 y w pis III N N . ... w w. w w N 4A 4A N 'A 44- .. .44 C A D K Q . +ri O 14.9 MN E ti. - W Oil y� H i. . `. 9i � M bo a �n tt CL Sal aac tR .. opo to N CV m m ch N O to °nl O N ll1 n5 O O N � rt Gl h I� n m lD w o N 0) lO O m m m O m a m o v v rn m N ON ON N N N N N N N N O N H a Yi C O Y 7 u ¢ v m m E no � E W � v = Y N :! d ° � 0 •y r V p❑❑❑❑ O O U Q f - N O N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 >; ni v Ln o ri LO m Ln N N .m-1 Q1 ; V N o tD OH 00 00 Q m r H vT Kh N t? v� v} to N n I -q N 01 m o m o o 14 mm o oo 0 0 m 0 0 0 t Y N ❑ U o n Iq n � o v vi of 00 o a r, rri oN o ❑ ; u V Bryn .^-r I ai LO r- �4 m o '-i ❑ O C 0 V N W N cu lfr V} t Y N ❑ 0 0 Q f - M N U C Y ❑ u V >tL V N ❑ O C 0 N W N cu C _0 D C FS ? 5 U M of C O C dl C �7 QA L r ,+@. f0 a7 O R o U W ccO O O m N Ln N L. C O N of E r- 0 Y u c c E c 7 cu o O V > .� O O U m 0 r 0 0 0 Q f - M N i N O N d i✓ N CL m O Q ,0 N t.. en Q) CL O ra U M Ll 00 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O N m 00 m O O O O O O O O r` O0 O O O O O 14 o' 1 o 4 ' 4 c*i 14 00 r` 06 ei/m 00 O 0 1 o o N rn r� Ln r m t\ ri w O 1\ O O O Ln O O O M 00 N ri 00 Ln rn Ln O.--1 C l Q1 00 r O rl rn r -I M 61 Ln * O cr Lo t\ Lr) tD v1 O v ' Lo N m m 01 >\ 00 00 LID W J) d sn c-+ Ln rA v c --f 01 M N N r -i d' I;T CL Q 7i r -i CL C 2 T-1 N N ar F- a1 N Ln ct :WI In to E ri LW t/} t/? t/1• th 14 tr} to t/�- ta trn lc ? v} ta tr1. tr1. fLn C {/} 411• tn• t/} I/} t/r- j, = T T O O O 2 v y E E Lu uj oU O O O cc O ci cu J QCL O n m U � U� 2 O, « ar a O Lu => w O n Ln U- LL Cu = rn 0 = O r- N m Cj InN M ri NM d' M d• u7 ri r -i ri Lr) r -I M H In u1 Ln in Ln u1 N N N N ri e -i c-1 ri fV (V N N N N N N N N N t!? V'} V1 OOOO 00 CD OOO0 O O O O O O 00 00 N m to m LO N In N r -i ri W r` O0 O lz:� 00 M W O m M n N -t m 000 r i Cl)l ei/m 00 r. u) 'ct N N Lr) e tr) tri- t/} m i/? V} V} t4 O O O r C N O O O 't lO .4 C l Q1 N 00 lqt tin O M m .0 ,v c Lr) N � t!? V'} V1 OOOO ih V} V} t/} V). V} V} tf} V). O O r -i O 00 Ol N tn• O O Q1 Lf) T CD 0 CD OOO0 0 O O 00 Lo O O N In ri ri O 4 C14 r -I O O O M M r i N m 001 l�O Cl)l tmr) 00 r. u) 'ct N N Lr) e tr) ri N m O r -i C LD LO cr-i r C N N rM-i 't ih V} V} t/} V). V} V} tf} V). O O r -i O 00 Ol N tn• O O Q1 Lf) T CD 0 CD CD 0 O O O O O 00 O O O O r -i O LO O O O 00 r` O n O) CD tf1 O -�F O LU Ln H ul ri N O r -i C 7 7 0 N tn U_ C LU � OA O CU � G W LU h m m O O C 7 X C C U O Q _ m h Q1 a CC tin U cn cn .0 ,v c � Q u .Q d C cr LU J) d " L 7 O v trDC M to O Lu CL Q 7i aj J CL C 2 T-1 N d ar F- a1 N Ln Q :WI In to E ri LW r -I irf n L b L fLn C cn ro U j, = T T E 2 v y E E Lu uj oU cc O ci cu J QCL w U � U� 2 O, « ar a O Lu => w O n Ln U- LL Cu = rn 0 = O r- N m Cj InN M ri NM d' M d• u7 ri r -i ri H H In u1 Ln in Ln u1 N N N c-1 ri fV (V N N N N N N N N N 7 0 N tn U_ LU � OA u t/1 l CU � G W h h m m O O C 7 X u U O Q U5 m h cz tin U cn cn .0 ,v c � Q u .Q d C cr LU J) d " L 7 O M to O Lu CL Q 7i aj J 41 O U Q T-1 N m �t a1 N Ln ill Ln In to m ri r -r r -I r -f ri m m m m cn 7 0 N Ln N ti O N Q ++ N Q0. O co y a O u a N LL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ol O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 0, n O O O ri 0 0 0 0 I r� m 0 LD O O 0) On N r- 00 00 O LO O Ln O O r` m 0 tO Ln O Kt 0 0 Ct 00 q tD LO N m O O 0) O) N N O O 00 r- 00 o I;e 06 m oo .-i ni ri o o m' cri ca cll r; a 00 C' m m m e -i vi N ri N in cn N O rrl LLI N D_ tv rl Vi V). i/i V} V? V} in V} lf� if)- V> ih Vi V)- V). - Jn V} V} in V} V). V). in V). V). t4 th 00 x 00 O C E w O LL �.. O� a, rl 00 r-1 ami � O d N cn U0 0) 0) O' s � z H N t/) p ID m N LD N Owl C coon Ln Q7 CL O 1 w Q t L- �' c9 O d _d ai u C6 _a M m tt O e -I ri N -0 w Lu p, C d O m q) = w in. v). CO j V} G. w i/} V). � i/} v co i/} V). � w m cn � L� y cn 00 a to Fc-, n Q O E [�0 'C d OJ v w N U Qf O C3 < Q f0 � w i A V b� Q E 9nO C3 C3 E E ¢ 0 m +� O O B '►+ `= 07 Q 01 p m °� OJ ++ O 7 i3 O O u O F- U D_ LL. D 0> V} O w c 0> O Lu a 0 0 0 0 m Ln Lu Vy O m cr O a -i ri N m" N mlit Ln " N m Ct n O O 00 r-1 N r -i N m� m m � Ln N m mr N-* Ln � Ln R Ln d* Ln W m wtD Ln Ln 8.0 Ln Ot Ln 07 Ln 0) Ln In Ln CP Ln -t Ln qCt Ln * l.*:3 14 'Ct le Rt R' -t it <t U Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln N N VY 14f). v 0 o 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Cl 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 Ln 00 Ln 0 0 0 0 a 00 o o 0 Ln 0 0 o O Ln to o 0 o 0 0 o a Ln o o D) o qt Ln r� o CD 00 Rt to M N N m N 0 0 O M O N H 0 0 N 00 O m N Ln Ln LD 00 m m 00 14 m rq r{ r-[ N m' ri cr ri 00 Ln r m N of m in N N 14 V} V} v► V} V} In V} V)- V). Vi V} V). vl- V} V). V).I V} O N N W N z LLI D_ tv +�+ x � C E w LL �.. 0) a, � d ami � O d 'O 0) N O' s � z H N t/) p E Ln E C N Ln Q7 CL 1^ w Q t L- �' c9 _d ai u C6 _a w m I- O N C -0 w Lu p, C d O m q) = w CO j O G. w n C � O. v co � d � w m cn � L� y cn 00 a to Fc-, n O O E [�0 'C d OJ v w N U Qf C < Q f0 � w i A V b� Q E 9nO E E ¢ +� O O B '►+ `= 07 Q 01 p L °� OJ ++ O 7 i3 O O u O F- U D_ LL. D 0> O w c 0> O Lu a 0 0 0 0 m Ln Lu C__l !-- m cr O a -i ri N m" N mlit Ln " N m Ct n ri N 00 r-1 N r -i N m� m m � Ln N m mr N-* Ln Ln Ln R Ln d* Ln W m wtD Ln Ln 8.0 Ln Ot Ln 07 Ln 0) Ln In Ln CP Ln -t Ln qCt Ln * l.*:3 14 'Ct le Rt R' -t it <t "t Ln Ln Ln Ln O N Ln WC) 12 N CL 4. N L]. a) O Qn N CO CL o m CL N1 LL 0 O I0 c 0 c 0 0 c m m c w w c LO w 'J! u Lw. u! 0 0 O 0 0 C O O 0 0 O rn m O c LO) m 61 W C U) r) ui Ln Cl) c u! tr} Hj'}1 'V} 'V} {/ CD O O O O C O O O ri c O O O O c O O 61 W C U) r) ui Ln Cl) c w w N �t r N aJ Ud N tr} Hj'}1 'V} 'V} {/ -1 lzr ItT � UD w w w 0 0 66 CD °N° O CV H w Ln T% IN III W.. 0 r4 ' 0 Ln N O 0 e -I a -i O N 1� 07 �r) m c* Ln N Ln to J tr> to 0 N � N aJ Ud O Ll r Z d c C E .� Q w a w; u D c o t _0- ti '^ U n = 0 U U L a cu aJ aJ �/1 J Q O O U L t0 b '�j U U Y C a� p W o O O p Y u Lu 0 0> m �- Z ur O Lo .-1 N m�* to r-+ N m d Ln cn Ln Ln to m m m Q -1 lzr ItT � UD w w w 0 0 66 CD °N° O CV H w Ln T% IN III W.. 0 r4 ' 0 Ln N O 0 e -I a -i O N 1� 07 �r) m c* Ln N Ln to J tr> to 0 N Indian River County, Florida * * MEMORANDUM �10y' File ID: 25-1098 Type: Constitutional Officers & Other Govt. TO: Honorable Board of County Commissioners THROUGH: John A. Titkanich, County Administrator FROM: Carole Jean Jordan, CFC Tax Collector DATE: November 6, 2025 SUBJECT: Tax Collector Annual Fiscal Report � 0.-B. Indian River County Administration Complex 1801 27th Street Vero Beach, Florida 32960 indianriver.gov Meeting Date: 11/18/2025 Indian River County, Florida Page 1 of 1 Printed on 11/13/2025 powehl Legistar- October 31, 2025 Carole jean Jordan, c.Fc. Tax Collector "How may we help you?" The Honorable Joseph Flescher Chairman, Board of County Commissioners Indian River County 1801 27h Street, Bldg A Vero Beach, Florida 32960 Dear Chairman Flescher: Enclosed is the 2025 Excess Fee Report for the Indian River County Tax Collector's Office. Total income from fees and investment earnings for 2025 was $12,939,333, and total expenditures were $10,060,607. This resulted in excess fees of $2,878,726, an increase of $735,947 over the projected amount. Of this total, $2,586,182 will be returned to the Board of County Commissioners, an increase of $661,158 over projections, while $292,544 will be returned to the other taxing districts. If you have any questions, please contact me. Sincerely, 46 4.4 -OL 9-404XW&4t.,, Carole Jean Jordan Tax Collector cc: Elissa Nagy, Chief Deputy Comptroller Kristen Daniels, Director — Office of Management & Budget P.O. Box 1509, Vero Beach, FL 32961-1509 Website: wwwirctax.com Phone: (772) 226-1343 Fax: (772) 226-1965 208 EXCESS2425 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY TAX COLLECTOR CAROLE JEAN JORDAN, TAX COLLECTOR EXCESS FEE DISTRIBUTION FISCAL YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2025 AGENCY DISTRICT CODE GENERALFUND GNF,GNFD MUNICIPAL SERV DIST MUN, MUNS EMS SERV DIST EMS, EMSD ROCKRIDGE SLD ROL LAURELWOOD SLD LWL GIFFORD SLD GFLD LAUREL CT SLD LCL OCEANSIDE SLD OCLD OSLO PARK SLD OPLD VERO LAKES MSTU VLM VB HIGH SLD VHL IXORA PK SLD IXL PORPOISE PT SLD PTL VERO SHORES SLD VSL POINCIANA SLD PPL ROSELAND RD SLD RRL GLENDALE LK SLD GLL WALKERS GLEN SLD WGL FLORALTON SLD FBL TIERRA LINDA SLD TLL WHISPERING PINES SLD WPL WEST WABASSO MSBU WWM MOORINGS SLD MSLD E. GIFFORD WATERSHED GIF NORTH COUNTY WATER ASSE NCWA LAND ACQ BOND LAND, LND LAND ACQ BOND 2004 LND2, L04 LANDFILL LF DUE TO COUNTY DUE TO OTHER GOVT TOTAL EXCESS FEES COMMISSIONS 2024/2025 COLLECTED EXCESS FEES 2024/2025 % $ 2,586,182.48 $ 5,634,620.64 74.6759% $ 1,931,255.56 $ 362,908.40 4.8096% $ 124,386.17 $ 1,090,006.07 14.4459% $ 373,597.52 $ 22.46 0.0003% $ 7.70 $ 214.74 0.0028% $ 73.60 $ 1,225.99 0.0162% $ 420.21 $ 28.78 0.0004% $ 9.86 $ 41.23 0.0005% $ 14.13 $ 652.62 0.0086% $ 223.68 $ 4,883.60 0.0647% $ 1,673.84 $ 2,283.30 0.0303% $ 782.60 $ 171.52 0.0023% $ 58.79 $ 4.47 0-0001% $ 1.53 $ 136.16 0.0018% $ 46.67 $ 396.88 0.0053% $ 136.03 $ 42.48 0.0006% $ 14.56 $ 64.79 0.0009% $ 22.21 $ 23.63 0.0003% $ 8.10 $ 46.94 0.0006% $ 16.09 $ 71.28 0.0009% $ 24.43 $ 33.86 0.0004% $ 11.61 $ 131.22 0.0017% $ 44.98 $ 211.08 0.0028% $ 72.35 $ 36.33 0.0005% $ 12.45 $ 499.59 0.0066% $ 171.23 $ 36,084.55 0.4782% $ 12,367.91 $ 19.13 0.0003% $ 6.56 $ 410,570.07 5.4413% $ 140,722.11 $ 7,545,431.81 100.0000% $ 2,586,182.48 ALLOC 001.00.208010 $ 2,586,182.48 89.84% 620.00.208000 $ 292,543.69 10.16% $ 2,878,726.17 209 Carole jean Jordan, c.F c. Tax Collector "How may we help you?" MEMORANDUM TO: John A. Titkanich, Jr., County Administrator FROM: Carole Jean Jordan, Tax Collector SUBJECT: Agenda Item DATE: October 31, 2025 Please place the following on the Agenda for the Board of County Commissioners meeting on Tuesday November 18, 2025, under Constitutional Officer's Matters: Tax Collector, Carole Jean Jordan. We are hereby presenting our Annual Fiscal Report for the Fiscal Year Ended September 30, 2025, as required by Section 218.36 of the Florida Statutes. Also attached is the Report of Distribution of Excess Fees for fiscal year ended September 30, 2025. Thank you for your attention to this matter, and if you have any questions or if we can be of any assistance, please feel free to call me at (772) 360-3351. 4 4.,OL 9-U4"O,�� cc: Elissa Nagy, Chief Deputy Comptroller Kristen Daniels, Director — Office of Management & Budget P.O. Box 1509, Vero Beach, FL 32961-1509 Website: wwwirctax.com Phone: (772) 226-1343 Fax: (772) 226-1965 210 EXCESS2425 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY TAX COLLECTOR CAROLE JEAN JORDAN, TAX COLLECTOR EXCESS FEE DISTRIBUTION FISCAL YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2025 ALLOC DUE TO COUNTY 001.00.208010 $ 2,586,182.48 89.84% DUE TO OTHER GOVT 620.00.208000 $ 292,543.69 10.16% TOTAL EXCESS FEES $ 2,878,726.17 211 COMMISSIONS 9/30/2025 COLLECTED EXCESS FEES AGENCY 2024/2025 $ 2,878,726.17 GENERAL FUND $ 7,545,431.81 $ 2,586,182.48 FIND $ 16,293.52 $ 5,584.71 SCHOOLBOARD $ - $ - FL GREEN FINANCE AUTH $ 13,789.62 $ 4,727.63 ST JOHNS WMD $ 101,443.77 $ 34,770.53 SEB INLET DIST $ 25,094.86 $ 8,603.40 MOSQUITO CONT $ 135,452.37 $ 46,427.29 HOSPITAL $ 432,747.79 $ 148,335.00 FELLSMERE WCD $ 1,500.00 $ 514.26 IR FARMS WCD $ 1,500.00 $ 514.26 ST JOHNS IMPROVE DIST $ 1,500.00 $ 514.26 SEB RIVER IMPROV DISTRICT $ 1,500.00 $ 514.26 VERO LAKES WCD $ 19.04 $ 6.53 DELTA FARMS WCD $ 1,500.00 $ 514.26 SEBASTIAN STORM DRAIN $ 103,458.62 $ 35,469.48 CITY OF VERO BEACH $ 17,640.38 $ 6,047.82 TOTAL $ 8,398,871.78 $ 2,878,726.17 ALLOC DUE TO COUNTY 001.00.208010 $ 2,586,182.48 89.84% DUE TO OTHER GOVT 620.00.208000 $ 292,543.69 10.16% TOTAL EXCESS FEES $ 2,878,726.17 211 EXCESS2425 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY TAX COLLECTOR CAROLE JEAN JORDAN, TAX COLLECTOR EXCESS FEE DISTRIBUTION FISCAL YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30. 2025 212 COMMISSIONS 2024/2025 COLLECTED EXCESS FEES AGENCY DISTRICT CODE 2024/2025 % $ 2,586,182.48 GENERAL FUND GNF, GNFD $ 5,634,620.64 74.6759% $ 1,931,255.56 MUNICIPAL SERV DIST MUN, MUNS $ 362,908.40 4.8096% $ 124,386.17 EMS SERV DIST EMS, EMSD $ 1,090,006.07 14.4459% $ 373,597.52 ROCKRIDGE SLD ROL $ 22.46 0.0003% $ 7.70 LAURELWOOD SLD LWL $ 214.74 0.0028% $ 73.60 GIFFORD SLD GFLD $ 1,225.99 0.0162% $ 420.21 LAUREL CT SLD LCL $ 28.78 0.0004% $ 9.86 OCEANSIDE SLD OCLD $ 41.23 0.0005% $ 14.13 OSLO PARK SLD OPLD $ 652.62 0.0086% $ 223.68 VERO LAKES MSTU VLM $ 4,883.60 0.0647% $ 1,673.84 VB HIGH SLD VHL $ 2,283.30 0.0303% $ 782.60 IXORA PK SLD IXL $ 171.52 0.0023% $ 58.79 PORPOISE PT SLD PTL $ 4.47 0.0001% $ 1.53 VERO SHORES SLD VSL $ 136.16 0.0018% $ 46.67 POINCIANA SLD PPL $ 396.88 0.0053% $ 136.03 ROSELAND RD SLD RRL $ 42.48 0.0006% $ 14.56 GLENDALE LK SLD GLL $ 64.79 0.0009% $ 22.21 WALKERS GLEN SLD WGL $ 23.63 0.0003% $ 8.10 FLORALTON SLD FBL $ 46.94 0.0006% $ 16.09 TIERRA LINDA SLD TILL $ 71.28 0.0009% $ 24.43 WHISPERING PINES SLD WPL $ 33.86 0.0004% $ 11.61 WEST WABASSO MSBU WWM $ 131.22 0.0017% $ 44.98 MOORINGS SLD MSLD $ 211.08 0.0028% $ 72.35 E. GIFFORD WATERSHED GIF $ 36.33 0.0005% $ 12.45 NORTH COUNTY WATER ASSE NCWA $ 499.59 0.0066% $ 171.23 LAND ACQ BOND LAND, LND $ 36,084.55 0.4782% $ 12,367.91 LAND ACQ BOND 2004 LND2, L04 $ 19.13 0.0003% $ 6.56 LANDFILL LF $ 410,570.07 5.4413% $ 140,722.11 $ 7,545,431.81 100.0000% $ 2,586,182.48 ALLOC DUE TO COUNTY 001.00.208010 $ 2,586,182.48 89.84% DUE TO OTHER GOVT 620.00.208000 $ 292,543.69 10.16% TOTAL EXCESS FEES $ 2,878,726.17 212 C9 Z cod 0 J C LLwu w� C9 M � oUJe 0 0 m O Z U- c LL } U Z o Ll Q a Z F Z C LL ~ F �JQy W e Z Z - u LL U' Q O (n N CL N r 0 M M C9 0: F W m m LL ~ ' W O W U H v � W N Q U) 0 0 Z W 0 LU (n z > Qw 2~mILa Q Q } rn 0 Z W z LL= ~ O J J cli0 Q 1 N O M Cl) w w CO O W r- =W ~ U -1 W 6% 6% V) UV W > Fr x 0 N zQ~Fw Zz� z�W o_ W 0ZHU �o Q U Q cn m m N J' JQ I J W � N o J U m r n XQozF- LL ri LL F -U LL of C9 Z cod 0 J C LLwu w� C9 M � oUJe 0 0 m O Z U- c LL } U Z o Ll Q a Z F Z C LL ~ F �JQy W e Z Z - u LL U' Q v r r m m v v vs rn m rn m m cq 0 Cl) r W r- 6% 6% N o_ o_ co �o m � � n Cl) ri of Cl) Go co MO GOO � a O f0 r � vi Cl) C CQ' O Lf) ' f0 Ld vi II o Ng V70 W o 04 co co co co O Of m N O O O M 1 n 1 n 0 D 00000 N M M � � •- � � �� NN N N N N NN � N maim w W Z U O w w U Z Z a W O LL ItV 3 z yUQw w HQ aN LL W D }am 3:C9(3 O F w LL Z— Z o Z W Z a o am J} baa z wC.) u; . o 0>¢O -jao w co LL wwWW z U ww>_� > F- }o �> P:PP N w v) JUW w CO CO) LL' J ad'F W� JJ JD W U (�J w wX:(L zF-WW w ¢_ �0 in cn¢¢¢U J g o J Co WgKrF- n W WWP 0 J W zOnz FJJJ W wwwwm Q - m z Q zV-5 UJ W mQQF Q Po H- < OW W W w J V' a LL J =owaWww'(LMxO Q JU7»Z WHHHU Q o j Q Q Q w O U�>> P P M p Q Q O O 0 7 D O O O Q O D LL O O L)(MK KoOQ F = LL H H M T --I N FINST2425(B) TAX COLLECTOR, INDIAN RIVER COUNTY CAROLE JEAN JORDAN, TAX COLLECTOR FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2025 REVENUES CHARGES FOR SERVICES: COUNTY OFFICERS COMMISSIONS MISCELLANEOUS REVENUES: INTEREST OTHER REVENUES TOTALREVENUES EXPENDITURES GENERAL GOVERNMENT SERVICES: FINANCIAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE: PERSONAL SERVICES OPERATING EXPENDITURES CAPITAL OUTLAY DEBT SERVICE: LEASE CAPITAL OUTLAY SUBSCRIPTION CAPITAL OUTLAY LEASE PRINCIPAL LEASEINTEREST TOTAL EXPENDITURES INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA TAX COLLECTOR STATEMENT OF REVENUES,EXPENDITURES AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES - BUDGET AND ACTUAL ALL GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS FOR THE YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2025 GENERALFUND VARIANCE FAVORABLE ACCOUNT NUMBER BUDGET ACTUAL (UNFAVORABLE) % EXCESS OF REVENUES OVER (UNDER) EXPENDITURES OTHER FINANCING SOURCES (USES) TRANSFERSIN SBITA FINANCING LEASE FINANCING TRANSFERS OUT TO BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS TRANSFERS OUT TO OTHER GOVERNMENTS TOTAL OTHER FINANCING SOURCES (USES) EXCESS OF REVENUES AND OTHER SOURCES OVER (UNDER) EXPENDITURES AND OTHER USES FUND BALANCES 10/01/24 FUND BALANCES 9/30/25 341.80 $9,957,220 $ 10,483,727 $ 526,507 361.10 200,000 302,133 $ 102,133 381.00 - - $ - $ 10,157,220 $ 10,785,860 $ 628,640 513.10 $ 6,272,405 $ 6,133,403 $ 139,002 513.30 1,517,559 1,005,466 $ 512,093 513.60 224,477 223,483 $ 994 - 342,705 $ (342,705) 1,855,194 $ (1,855,194) 513.71 489,943 $ (489,943) 513.72 - 10,413 $ (10,413) $ 8,014,441 $ 10,060,607 $ (2,046,166) $ 2,142,779 $ 725,253 $ (1,417,526) $ $ 1,810,768 $ 1,810,768 342,705 342,705 (1,925,024) (2,586,182) (661,158) 89.838% (217,755) (292,544) (74,789) 10.162% $ (2,142,779) $ (725,253) $ 1,417,526 I do solemnly swear that the foregoing is a true, correct and complete report of all revenues and expenditures of my office for the year ending the 30th day of September, 2025. (Signature)yyy Office of Tax Collector, Indian River County 214 N ' ' ' ' ' M L � Di co Cn a) rlrn N 69 64 64 64 64 E9 (A M D7 Cn LO d r CD N O N M 6R N C) 0 (17 CD N LO co (r0 I I m U) W_ 61� 6c� ' H M O J_ L o m Q O Cl) J LO 04 (O Z N Z o Q N N Q9, < W M VI -11 &I, ell). e& ea ea 64 W O E,9 O Qc LL 00 Z Z W O cn D a o r LL (D O Z)LU(D}U) O � r W p r- LL D) wUUC7Z fl - N >%� LL - W M � H Q J � b4 Z Z Q W 64 M Q LLI } N (D o 2 w z LLJ z O U) ry p v N ) O Q LL o O Z rl- Of Z r - LLI m H M M Q w QU U ��Q Q D LU O 0 >W O U w Q� O 0 w Z Z > U 00 O�W� C�LL2 I- 0CD0 = w= >p z z a Lu Lu O W azF- U z O w p ow��ofzF- Q Z � WW a00 —a2} O z M O O w p of O J U F H Z Fn C/5 p Q F- M a z w Z V PWW0W O- U Z) O O O Z WIXp U U UQ(gU) waa Z ' J W Q W w Q 0 W N O J U = H U Q Z LL U LL LL N ' ' ' ' ' M L � Di co Cn a) rlrn N 69 64 64 64 64 E9 (A M D7 Cn LO d r CD N O N M 6R N C) 0 (17 CD N LO co (r0 I I m M O Cn Cf> rl- r co N O N M N co 0 Lf) CD N O co r Cn r O N M co O L co ti rn N N rl � N ti rn It s� 613� 61� 61� 6c� ' M O M O L o Z r rn N (f) (D N Q9, co VI -11 &I, ell). e& ea ea M O Cn Cf> rl- r co N O N M N co 0 Lf) CD N O co r Cn r O N M co O L co ti rn N N rl � N ti rn It s� 613� 61� 61� 6c� ' M O N Z O (f) (D r co It 64 6R b4 E,9 O 1- r 00 r O a0 Coo O CA W r- 00 D) fI- fl - N M W b4 EA 64 64 M N O N (D (D It O O p v CrD w Q wLLJ o U) 't ( i rl- CD 14- co r - LLI o M M CD ��Q Q N O 0 >W O H4 Hi I I I d} 64 e4 E 9 Z O O a W Z } W Q H U z Z U Fn H O p v LL w Q wLLJ o U) D z W zz LLJ z J W U) = J z g O LLI o < Q ct Q w w F—LU co W ' ��Q Q z �Z(� O 0 >W O J > Z 0 w Z Z W (~i)> 00 O�W� C�LL2 I- 0CD0 = w= >p z a Lu Lu O W wmw w Z z U z O w p ow��ofzF- Q v� U 2 2 Zo0F-Hoo a00 z Z z O O O z M O O w p U F H Z Fn C/5 p Q F- M a z w Z V PWW0W Z) O O O O O WIXp U �OUwwwLwLU waa Z Z Q 0 Z Z Q Q w Q 0 W Z Z � u O c Uw J p J F J � � O 0 u U w C X = Q U < Z N u LU w r ZN = pQ w r rJ 1' O z r Z c L Q w w a Lu u w 0- F J O (Y L U L 0 N w Lu z Q Q t/1 w O w F- P:J V, a L LU N 00 F- w Z O Q N w N W N J Q O LU rl N LuLuF- N w Z O Q Ln w N w2 -t.-D N J Q O LU rl N 0 LO LLJ w Z O Q v) w N U< Lin J N N Q O LU tl N Ln Ln Q w Z O Ln w N IZT Q w Q O rl N uIJUAMCI T O tD t\ t\ rn MA. O tD r` n m RIAs mi sm u�06, lD ' w tD w l3 rn r, r - N N t0 w t0 <0 rn 0rn r- r - r'4 N O Ln r -I r` 01 rn 00 m t0 0) Lrf N I:T O r` r` 00 Ln rl a4 to 00 .-i -4 Lr) lD Lr1 Lr1 Ln Lr) Ln Ln rl qj)- Iqj) t/? Iqj)- U J J NJ w O w QZ Q ~ Q Z Q N O w CO CCN U H Q CO LAJ w Z J * 06 J V L co w Ln J Z F- U vi LU w H Si Z LLJLL V) Q Z O Z N Q a Q Nw c w O O 0 w w w Ln Z O H Z J u O m U H w 000 UQ Q Q LL w O� D 0 U F- Indian River County, Florida *OxioA * MEMORANDUM File ID: 25-1099 Type: Constitutional Officers & Other Govt. TO: Honorable Board of County Commissioners THROUGH: John A. Titkanich, County Administrator FROM: Ryan L. Butler, Clerk of Circuit Court DATE: November 6, 2025 SUBJECT: Clerk of Circuit Annual Fiscal Report 1a,c. Indian River County Administration Complex 1801 27th Street Vero Beach, Florida 32960 indianriver.gov Meeting Date: 11/18/2025 Indian River County, Florida Page 1 of 1 Printed on 11/13/2025 poweiP1 It f_egiStar ", INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT AND COMPTROLLER STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES - BUDGET AND ACTUAL GENERAL FUND FOR THE YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2025 REVENUES NON COURT OPERATIONS REVENUE COURT OPERATIONS REVENUE MISCELLANEOUS REVENUES TOTAL REVENUES EXPENDITURES PERSONAL SERVICES OPERATING EXPENDITURES DEBT SERVICE: PRINCIPAL INTEREST TOTAL EXPENDITURES EXCESS OF REVENUES OVER (UNDER) EXPENDITURES OTHER FINANCING SOURCES (USES) TRANSFERS FROM BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS TRANSFERS TO BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS TRANSFERS TO CLERK OF COURT OPERATIONS CORP TOTAL OTHER FINANCING SOURCES (USES) EXCESS OF REVENUES AND OTHER SOURCES OVER (UNDER) EXPENDITURES AND OTHER USES FUND BALANCES 10/01/24 FUND BALANCES 9130/25 I, Ryan L. Butler, Clerk of the Circuit Court and Comptroller of Indian River County, Florida, do solemnly swear that the foregoing is a true, correct and complete report of all revenues and expenditures of my office for the year ending September 30, 2025. Ryan L. I%tler, Clerk of Circuit Court and Comptroller GENERAL FUND 5,618,399 5,458,110 160,289 660,102 449,008 211,094 14,800 14,295 505 1,855 1,822 33 6,295,156 5,923,235 371,921 (1,523,158) (17,404) 1,523,158 1,523,158 - (592,380) - (913,374) 1,523,158 17,404 1,505,754 (592,380) (913,374) (1,505,754) 219 VARIANCE FINAL FAVORABLE BUDGET ACTUAL (UNFAVORABLE) $ 1,241,500 1,441,986 $ 200,486 3,444,046 4,330,696 886,650 86,452 133,149 46,697 4,771,998 5,905,831 1,133,833 5,618,399 5,458,110 160,289 660,102 449,008 211,094 14,800 14,295 505 1,855 1,822 33 6,295,156 5,923,235 371,921 (1,523,158) (17,404) 1,523,158 1,523,158 - (592,380) - (913,374) 1,523,158 17,404 1,505,754 (592,380) (913,374) (1,505,754) 219 Indian River County, Florida * # MEMORANDUM �IOy' File ID: 25-1100 /o,D. Indian River County Administration Complex 1801 27th Street Vero Beach, Florida 32960 indianriver.gov Type: Constitutional Officers & Meeting Date: 11/18/2025 Other Govt. Sheriff Flowers request for excess budget funds Indian River County, Florida Page 1 of 1 Printed on 11/13/2025 POWT1 6 Legistar"I Sheriff Eric Flowers tli Indian River County Sheriff's Office November 13, 2025 Indian River Board of County Commissioners 180127th Street Vero Beach, FL 32960-3388 Re: Revised FY25 Reversion Memo - Final Honorable Chairman Flescher and the Board of County Commissioners: In an effort to end our ongoing budget disagreement and refocus our collective efforts on service to the citizens of Indian River County, I would like to propose the following solution: I have returned $1,162,956.16 in excess funds to the General Fund and $254,995.00 in excess funds to the Optional Sales Tax Fund for a total of $1,417,951.16 for Fiscal Year 2024/2025. Of this amount, there are outstanding FY25 purchase orders totaling $495,664.63. The General Fund portion is $240,669.63 and the Optional Sales Tax Fund portion is $254,995.00 Additionally, the Honorable Clerk of Court, Ryan Butler, returned $592,379.60; the Honorable Property Appraiser, Wesley Davis, returned $469,529.71; and the Honorable Supervisor of Elections, Leslie Swan, returned $56,330.84. In total, this equates to $2,536,191.31 of unexpected and unbudgeted funding for Indian River County. I propose that the $2,536,191.31 returned to you be allocated to the Indian River County Sheriff of which $2,040,526.68 would be for the FY26 budget and the remaining $495,664.63 would be for FY25 outstanding purchase orders, broken out between the General Fund and Optional Sales Tax Fund, as indicated above. Finally, I am requesting that $963,808.69 be funded from the County's reserves to help purchase equipment that is not anticipated to recur annually. As I have said, I never wanted to file a lawsuit against you and want to work together to keep our community a great place to live, work, and play. The amount I am requesting in this revised letter still represents a figure which would cause an operational hardship on the public safety services provided by the Sheriff's Office. However, for the betterment of our community, if the Board approves this request, I will agree to withdraw both the appeal and writ of mandamus. 221 We were all elected to serve Indian River County and this solution provides a viable resolution to our dispute. I am requesting this matter be placed on your meeting agenda for November 18, 2025. Sincerely, J 1 fl Eric Flowers Sheriff 223 u J Y z Q Cd C O u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u KKKKKKKKK Z O Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z z Z Z Z VI V1 V1 VI VI V1 VI td VI F- Vf N VI Vf Vf N VI VI VI N VI VI V1 V1 VI V1 Vf '... V1 V1 VI O K 0 C 0 C 0 OC 0 m 0 C' 0 m 0 K� 0 0 N lY O OC O OC O OC O m O K O OG O m O OC O lL' O m O K O K O K O K O d' O K' OI lY O K� O O H F- H E J J 7cr R J_ J_ m m m m m m m m m m u m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m Z cr R K K lY d' lY lY K W. W C m OC C OL � m K m C lY OC OC 0: w OC OG 0: 0c OC O Y Y U Q F N F N F N H N H N I- N H N H N H N H N H N 1- N H N H N H N f- N F- N 1- N H N F N H N H N F N H N H N H N H N H N H N e 5 Q Q W D D a a a D D D O U O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O F 1- u J 0 J 0 J 0 J 0 J 0 J 00 J J 00 J 1' N J l7 J 0010 J J J l7 J C7 J C7 J U J C7 J U' J t7 J u' J l7 J 000 J J J l7 J l7 J l7 J C7 �l l0l Nl N Nl N Nl til a N Ni N N N N NNN N N N N N V1 0 q 0 0 0 0 0 ll 0 0 0000 l14 ei 0 N 0 �q 0 �-I 0 N 0 ei 0 H 0 N 0 N 0 N 0 N 0 N 0 e -I 0 N 0 . 0 . 0 . 0 '-I 0 '4 0 ei 0 r-I 0 ''I 0 c'I 0 '"I 0 c-I 0 0 ''I 0 Iq 0 N 0 f/l 0 e-1 O O O O O N m (7! m Ol O O O O mm w 01 m 01 m Ol m N O 00 m N m N M N M N m N M N M N M N M N M N M m M m m M m M M m H '-I '-I 01 M N m N m t0 a N N N N I� N N n n N Ol N m m M 0 m 0 m 0 M 0 M 0 m 0 m 0 m 0 n N t0 n v a Ql a T V V t0 l0 w V t0 R l0 V l0 R tD t0 w c .-I o 0 0 � O N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N ni tr1 ni M M tvf erf M M M E a c d CL O A C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C O +' = Lvt o ol 'y 1`p c u Y F- 00 C u N z OD W 0 = 0 uj 3.` y E m � to C p0 f0 +' Ol L O. rm:m ` f00 N u O T C W Cd w 2 p '0 7 — Y C H 3 LL y u T u N V� f0 'O m m � Y u = L in V O Q M m¢ 3 y' K m C m m o `1 C L Ol 0 C u N a+ O) f0 m r 7 aT+ aT+ a-. C lL Q N C O- f0 u w L 10 aL-. f0 vii L C K OJ C L C to 2`9 10 `y Y u 2- uA D. a O. 7 O. 7 O. d Q igwo W `o u O 0 `o L NL C O mr y¢a- `o o f0 mYvo O1 L> xooLuo O _ 0) 0 W 00 W y y ao W a z w 0 0 w w w _ Y o` �► LL w Q W W W W W W w W W w W W W W W w W C r H g¢� OL O E O E O E O E O O E O O O E C O E O O o E 0 E 0 0 E 0 0 E 0 E 0 E 0 E 0 E 0 0 E 0 E 0 E p p 0 E E E E E E E E E E E Q u o< v v v v v v v v v 3 v'0 -o 'a'a'a v -o -o v M fli v M v M M -o O z 5 0 LL 0 m 0 m 0 m 0 m 0 m 0 m 0 m 0 m 0 m O 0 m 0 m 0 m 0 m 0 m 0 m 0 m 0 m 0 m 0 m 0 m 0 m 0 m 0' m 0 m 0 m 0 m d N U N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N 00 N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 lL N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N 01 N O N l0 t0 t0 01 N I� m O tD 1� tD N O 00'n M N N 'i O O 01 M n l0 c? M N O 01 00 n E .1 'I m m m V m V m M m m N m N m m N I� m l0 m w m N m N m N m N m N m n m w M n m N m N m m m m t» 00 m mm m m 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Z N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N O N O N O N O N O N O N O N O N O N O N O N cc N N cc N N coo N N N 0 N 0 N O N O N co N N 0 N cc N N 00 N N 0 N 0 N O N O N O 0. N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N 223 224 u Z N u vt O Z Z Z Z j Z Z Z Z a 2 U O m Z z z a p j 6 �j - O � �^ u Z p arm+ cc O cc O O O 0 W W 0 O H 0 E m m>> CO [O m m m LLa W W i U� J O 5 w O t,7 g F a O CL Wco O vii C V~1 G vti O O Q d Z Ou O OJ wW e t7 l7 l7 t7 D l7 0 w C 7 � O t!1 N l!1 N If1 N M N l0 00 VI M M to ut H O1 Ie�} l0 H t0 a E A C 4 O O O O O O O O O O OO i 0 r 0 ti 0 r 0 N' 0 0 r 0 '-I 0 N 0 0 N 0 F- M N M N M N M N 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 O W OO O O of %O V tD V l0 a tD Ln 1l w M ill O O O w N m O1 m rl C p O M O M O M O M /n M LM a w Cl O O m c m -�fC N w L E N o a a r a O v► Y Y Y Y Y V Y Y N Y M F Z O � O N Z u -W Ln W U_ L Q a0+ N i d Loo C C W U O Q H K 01 N d y� m .y U ? W Oc a Y u,e C N m G 3 W j) ° m a rn U Z W g C7 w0. m > L in y L m L U Q in yLi- -O W J Z 2° 2 2 O> E m uw 2 a w w w w� a> 3 0> C O E O E O E O E O w VI o V N cc N O p a LL a� O N Ln w N O w Z O m m CO co vii li l7 N C7 �tA 'A U OC Z `m m N ut N Ln N vt N vt N ut N Ln N of N ui N of N ut N Ln N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 tL N N N N N N N N N N N E v v m N o M 0 t� m 0 to m 0 m 0 N.+ 0 0 v cn 0 allo cn 0 a m 0 .� 0 m 0 Z �n �n L" m Ln Ln Ln Ln m m O N O N O N O N O N O N O N O N O N O N O N O. d N N N N N N N N N N N 224 w 2 p - a 3 - W x m - z _ u C w c 9 0 E0� c b ? '20 10 E - a ? a o E B A e a a g i c y E E z u L 9 N cz a.`c� G ESR W n o � A EE EE EEEvE up IM .n z8c 8 1° E ^ E � o A u ; � p p u 3 u¢ E ,Eli 3 iii=ff88ma`a` Ea" �ES$o33o338°Su°�33c 8 888888888888888888 gSrge�eM�m���A O ------------------- 2 g E � a � - d � E E E u `n > ; ` EBvdrpv �� � o.E"uY n dE a �MgoBa' ea=BB = E e z i w i 9 iii d '3e u 3 d ' E a e E n E g C S N « m - u E E �ga $ 3 o E v c E E O a o x u s « c S, dna s EE v°nS _° n cid F3 o c ug n33Esr „�8goada mg;mE"=���A E i.H .H 3$9z�., z a 8m8a8T888888888888" l� z° a a- W E i E E E i i E E E E E E E a 5 c _ _ _ =WEW WEEW -`E N N 43 3 4 34 88N8 SSe �Eoo8§8821a ^n 225 Indian River County, Florida # # MEMORANDUM �ORI04' File ID: 25-1102 I0, E. Indian River County Administration Complex 1801 27th Street Vero Beach, Florida 32960 indianriver.gov Type: Constitutional Officers & Meeting Date: 11/18/2025 Other Govt. Supervisor of Elections Annual Fiscal Report Indian River County, Florida Page 1 of 1 Printed on 11/13/2025 Leslie R. Swan Supervisor of Elections Indian River County October 31, 2025 The Honorable Joseph Flescher, Chairman Indian River County Board of County Commissioners Building A 1801 270' Street Vero Beach, FL 32960-3388 Dear Chairman Flescher, Enclosed is check number 2285 for $ 68,363.40, which represents funds due to the Board of County Commissioners for the period ending September 30, 2025, as detailed below: Interest Earned $ 6,390.96 Candidate Fees/Services $ 5,641.60 Excess 24/25 Budget $ 56,330.84 TOTAL $ 68,363.40 Should you have any questions or require additional information, please do not hesitate to contact me at 226-4705. Sincerely, Leslie Rossway Swan Supervisor of Elections CC: Elissa Nagy, Finance Director Kristin Daniels, Budget Director 228 10. F. Indian River County Indian River County, Florida Administration Complex 1801 27th Street Vero Beach, Florida 32960 * # indianriver.gov MEMORANDUM File ID: 25-1072 Type: Constitutional Officers & Meeting Date: 11/18/2025 Other Govt. TO: Board of County Commissioners THROUGH: John A Titkanich, Jr. County Administrator Nancy Bunt, Assistant County Administrator Anthony Warren, Director of Building & Facilities Services FROM: Chadwick Bacon, Assistant Director of Building & Facilities Services DATE: October 30, 2025 SUBJECT: Supervisor of Elections Carpet Replacement BACKGROUND The Supervisor of Elections has submitted a request to replace the carpet in their office. To facilitate timely approval and funding, it is recommended that the Supervisor of Election's flooring request be presented to the Board for approval. The project will be completed by Facilities Management to ensure all related flooring projects are addressed concurrently and efficiently. This project will be completed in two separate phases to minimize disruption for the Supervisor of Election's office staff and maintain operational continuity. ANALYSIS 850 Sq Yd: Carpet Removal and Replacement 235.17 Sq Yd: CVT Tile Removal and Replacement 1,056 Ft: Installation of 6" Millwork Base Molding Phase I Labor and material cost: $53,345.03 Phase II Labor and material cost: $53,345.03 Total Labor and material cost: $106,690.06 BUDGETARY IMPACT Funding, in the amount of $106,690.06, will be made available via budget amendment to the General Fund/Facilities Management/Maintenance - Supervisor of Elections Floor account, number 00122019-034610- 25051. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends the Supervisor of Election's flooring request for replacement flooring, in the amount of $106,690.06, be approved by the Board of County Commissioners. Indian River County, Florida Page 1 of 1 Printed on 11/13/2025 POWT1 0Y LegistarT" o Ir 10/20/2025 John Evans Indian River County RE: Flooring Proposal for: Project # 991269 Revision #: Revision Date: 991269 Indian River County Supervisor of Elections Office Leslie Swan We are pleased to provide the following quotation for the above referenced facility. Pricing is based on the Tarkett/State of Florida Contract #30161700-24-SRCWL-ACS. MAIN BID We Color Nance Lapis Marine Aftermath R Ethos Omnicoat Modular Tile 24"x24" 23517 C -EX Modular Tile Adhesive - 4 gal. Carpet Installation - Modular Tile Install Primer Additional Cost for After Hours Installation Carpet Removal - Double Stick/Attached Cushion Carpet Disposal Adhesive Removal Floor Prep - Material and Labor Tarkett Transition Strips and Labor Moisture Testing F&I Supply and install 6" Millwork Base Sl Freight #18 Navy Blue OuandtV UoM Unit price Line Total 921.38 YD2 @ $ 30.31 13.00 EA @ $ 123.93 850.00 YD2 @ $ 10.13 7,650 FT2 @ $ 1.14 850.00 YD2 @ $ 11.01 850.00 YD2 @ $ 13.98 850 YD2 @ $ 0.97 7,650 FT2 @ $ 1.35 7,650 FT2 @ $ 1.61 96 FT @ $ 5.23 8 EA @ $ 264.12 1,056.00 FT @ $ 10.98 Subtotal Estimated Sales Tax TOTAL NOTES: 1. Field measure and estimated quantities by: Interior Flooring Solutions 2. Standard running line carpet products require a 65 square yard minimum purchase, except Express and Priority Express colors which require a 25 square yard minimum purchase, and except the style Plexus Colour which requires a 5 square yard minimum purchase. 3. Please include product style, color, and backing on purchase order. 4. Manufacturing overage is included in material quantity, to bill only at the amount shipped. The overage % is up to: 5. No freight is charged for adhesives (ancillary supplies) when shipped with material order. When adhesives (ancillary supplies) are shipped without a material order, buyer is responsible for freight costs. EXCLUSIONS (unless specifically included in the above scope of work): Protection of Floors Attic Stock Night(Weekend Labor Dumpster Cost Bonding Cost Mats Preformed Comers Trip Charges Removal & Disposal Resilient Flooring Stair Materials Extensive Floor Preparation Furniture Moving Asbestos Abatement Sales Tax Carpet Cleaning Cleaning(Waxing of Resilient Border Carpet 27,926.94 1,611.11 8,610.50 8,721.00 9,358.50 11,883.00 824.50 10,327.50 12,316.50 502.08 2,112.96 11,594.88 900.59 106,690.06 106,690.06 5% TERMS OF PAYMENT: (Subject to Credit Approval) Net 30 Days • All Materials and Labor - Payment due within terms of each invoice (materials will be invoiced upon shipment, labor will be invoiced upon completion or as phased). 1 230 Project # 991269 10/20/2025 Revision #: Revision Date: 1. Change Orders: Any work not included in the above scope of work will require a signed change order before work can be performed. 2. Term of Quote: Prices given are firm for sixty days from proposal date. 3. Lead Times: Please note that we are a made to order mill and we cannot commence production until a signed PO or contract is received. Note that normal lead times are as follows: • Fast Track Carpets, two weeks plus shipping; • Running Line Carpets, four to six weeks plus shipping; • Custom Carpets, six to eight weeks plus shipping; • Lead times are approximate and do not start until after the purchase order or fully -executed contract is received. 4. Floor Preparation: Additional floor preparation may be required as a result of an unforeseen condition of the floor. Costs associated with this floor preparation will be negotiated on a job -to job basis. Our products perform properly when installed on floors that are free of dirt, oil, paint and excessive moisture. Floors that have moisture readings greater than the manufacturer specified tolerance will not meet specification and will require further curing time or treatment prior to carpet installation. We recommend only wet scraping or mechanical removal of all non -water based adhesives 5. Asbestos Abatement: This quote DOES NOT include asbestos abatement. Neither we nor our installers are responsible for the handling, removal or abatement of asbestos contained floor material or adhesive. Further, our policy is to request an Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) report prior to proceeding with any floor material or floor adhesive removal. We and our installers consider it the owner's responsibility to produce this report prior to executing this contract. If any chemical stripping agents such as those commonly used in asbestos abatement have been used, we and our installers may require additional measures be taken prior to installation of any product. These measures may affect the price of this quote. Please contact our Technical Services Department for more details. Please let me know if you have any questions or indicate your acceptance of this proposal by returning your signed purchase order or fully -executed contract via email. We look forward to working with you on this project. Sincerely, Mara ChaVarn.a-OrCLZ Maria Chavarria-Ortiz Account Coordinator Source One Department maria.chavarria-ortiz@tarkett.com 2 231 Indian River County, Florida * * MEMORANDUM �tpA 1�-A-, Indian River County Administration Complex 1801 27th Street Vero Beach, Florida 32960 indianriver.gov File ID: 25-1110 Type: Administrators Matters Meeting Date: 11/18/2025 TO: Members of the Board of County Commissioners THROUGH: John A Titkanich, Jr., County Administrator FROM: Kathy Copeland, Legislative Affairs and Communications Manager DATE: November 18, 2025 SUBJECT: Fellsmere Water Control District BACKGROUND Subsequent to the Board of County Commissioner's approval of the 2026 Legislative Priorities and presenting the same before the Indian River County Legislative Delegation a critically important issue has been raised that warrants a discussion (and direction) by the Board of County Commissioners. The issue at hand is the future of the Fellsmere Water Control District. Currently, there are multiple conversations occurring that involve the maintenance of canals within the jurisdictions of the Fellsmere Water Control District, and more importantly the flooding that has occurred in the past within the boundaries of the water control district. In the past, the County, working with the City of Fellsmere and the Fellsmere Water Control District, has mobilized resources to render aid to addressing flooding issues to minimize the impact to residents. At this time, it is staffs understanding that one solution being considered is to convert the Fellsmere Water Control District into a `dependent special district' and transfer responsibilities to the County. Our understanding is that this would also include transferring all assets, including land, equipment, and cash. It is believed no boundary changes are proposed, only the County becoming responsible for the maintenance of the canal system. The purpose of this agenda item is twofold, create an awareness of this evolving issue and provide an opportunity for Board discussion and direction. Staff believes it is imperative the County be actively engaged in discussions prior to being handed the keys and inheriting the responsibilities of the Fellsmere Water Control District. We would like to ensure the County's interests are protected among the myriad of issues that may be presented if a Local Bill were introduced and passed. STRATEGIC PLAN ALIGNMENT Legislative action in the form of a Local Bill will impact the County's Strategic Planning Goals: Environment, Indian River County, Florida Page 1 of 2 Printed on 11/13/2025 pow eiJgy Legistar'M Governance, Infrastructure, Public Safety and Quality of Life. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Authorize staff to engage in conversations and participate in the review of any legislation proposed to convert the Fellsmere Water Control District to a `dependent special district' with the governing and operational responsibilities transferred to Indian River County. Indian River County, Florida Page 2 of 2 Printed on 11/13/2025 POWT Y LegistarTR, Indian River County, Florida MEMORANDUM File ID: 25-1069 Type: Department Staff Report TO: Board of County Commissioners THROUGH: John A. Titkanich, Jr., County Administrator FROM: Kylie Yanchula, Natural Resources Director DATE: October 29, 2025 SUBJECT: The Nature Conservancy Runoff to Resilience Pilot Project BACKGROUND 13,F. I Indian River County Administration Complex 1801 27th Street Vero Beach, Florida 32960 indianriver.gov Meeting Date: 11/18/2025 The Nature Conservancy's Brightstorm program is pioneering a Smart Watershed Network Management (SWNM) approach that uses artificial intelligence and machine learning to optimize stormwater pond performance. Building on a decade of data, the program aims to retrofit existing stormwater infrastructure with smart technology to improve water quality, reduce flooding, and restore natural hydrology. A pilot project in the Indian River Lagoon will test this networked system to combat nutrient pollution that has severely impacted seagrass beds. The project seeks to demonstrate scalable, science -based solutions that can influence policy and be replicated across Florida and beyond. In February of 2025, The Nature Conservancy (TNC) presented the concept of a Runoff to Resilience Pilot Project to the Indian River Lagoon National Estuary Program Council given an interest in locating the project within the Indian River Lagoon watershed. Since that time, TNC has been working with St. Johns River Water Management District, Indian River County, and the University of Florida to identify potential stormwater management systems that can retrofitted and networked together for the pilot project. A series of privately managed stormwater networks were identified and TNC has been working with the respective HOAs on partnering for the pilot project. TNC has put in a legislative budget request to fund this project and has asked that the County write a letter in support of the project. The expected outcome of the Runoff to Resilience Pilot Project is that it will demonstrate that through the use of artificial intelligence and machine learning, performance of existing stormwater systems can be significantly improved for water quality benefits as well as flood protection. Given the challenges in meeting the Central Indian River Lagoon Basin Management Action Plan nutrient reductions, innovation and public-private partnerships will be critical as the County continues its efforts to protect the Lagoon. BUDGETARYIMPACT There is no cost to the County associated with this agenda item. POTENTIAL FUTURE BOARD ACTIONS Indian River County, Florida Page 1 of 2 Printed on 11/13/2025 pow,bt LegistarlTM Updates on the TNC Runoff to Resilience Pilot Project. STRATEGIC PLAN ALIGNMENT Environment, Infrastructure OTHER PLAN ALIGNMENT Lagoon Management Plan STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Board approve a letter of support for state funding for The Nature Conservancy's Runoff to Resilience Pilot Project and authorize the Chair to sign the letter on behalf of the County. Indian River County, Florida Page 2 of 2 Printed on 11/13/2025 powajj LegistarT , Stormwater, including urban runoff, is a leading cause of water pollution, and it oftentimes exacerbates flooding and erosion. In the U.S., at least 90 percent of land in urban and suburban areas is privately owned, yet most investments in surface water management are managed within the public sector. This leaves just 10 percent or less readily available for impactful, publiclyfunded stormwater infrastructure improvements. This underscores the need for public-private partnerships to produce viable solutions to address—at scale—the impacts of stormwater. With this in mind, The Nature Conservancy (TNC) created the Brightstorm program. r Brightstorm I'TheNature, 0 Conservancy SMART STORMWATER PONDS While innovative, the'smart' pond concept is relatively simple. Using cloud -based technology, existing stormwater ponds are retrofitted with continuously monitored water -level sensors that control automated release valves based on real-time weather forecasts. By using this information, smart ponds anticipate how much storage is required at any given moment, for any given forecasted storm event. This enables the ponds to hold runoff longer, which removes more nutrients and improves water quality, and to lower water levels ahead of storms to produce more flood storage capacity. Also, lower flow rates from smart ponds better mimic natural hydrological conditions, reducing erosion and enhancing wildlife habitat. SMART WATERSHED NETWORK MANAGEMENT (SWNM) Based on 10 years of data and analysis that proves the ability of smart ponds to generate enhanced environmental benefits, we believe this technology is ready for its next evolution. With the aid of Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Machine Learning (ML), we can create a collection of smart ponds that receive and share real-time data within a common network to optimize performance. We call this approach Smart Watershed Network Management, or SWNM. SWNM further advances the dynamic capabilities of smart ponds by enabling them to adapt to and learn from real-time local weather conditions and one another. In turn, it allows both operators at individual sites and those who manage at the watershed scale to improve designs and performance overtime, while still operating within regulatory constraints. SWNM systems have the potential to restore more natural hydrologic conditions, improve water quality and enhance flood -related climate resiliency. SWNM PILOT PROJECT IN THE INDIAN RIVER LAGOON Within the Indian River Lagoon watershed, there are more than 10,000 stormwater ponds. Brightstorm is working with policy experts, world-renowned engineering firms and leading AI/ML software companies to create the world's first AI/ML-driven SWNM installation where it matters most. The Indian River Lagoon (IRL) is one of North America's most biologically rich estuaries—and seagrasses are its lifeblood. Seagrass beds provide critical habitat for a wide array of fish and shellfish, which in turn sustain valuable commercial and recreational fisheries as well as birds, dolphins and other species. Excess nutrients—often carried by stormwater— affect seagrass health, as these pollutants fuel algal overgrowth, which reduces sunlight penetration through the water column. Since 2009, experts estimate that portions of the IRL have lost as much as 69% of its seagrass beds. SWNM PILOT PROJECT PLANS The Florida Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) recognizes seagrass as a keystone species, meaning it is critical for the overall structure and function of Florida's `' estuaries. To protect and restore seagrass beds in the IRL, the DEP has set Total Maximum Lutrients aily Loads that require significant reduction in entering the Lagoon; In the initial phase of the project, TNC will develop the SWNM AI/ML tools and select pilot sites. Next, we will implement up to a dozen smart pond pilot sites—in close proximity—to test and verify SWNM functionality and quantify environmental benefits, generating a body of science that can influence policy, community engagement and large-scale planning. With knowledge collected from the initial pilot sites, we will then replicate SWNM at additional priority locations and leverage historic levels of public infrastructure funding to expand the network of connected sites. At the end of the pilot, we expect the SWNM will: • Demonstrate that advances in software, artificial Intelligence, machine learning and adaptable control of water can lead to better environmental outcomes. • Publish in a peer-reviewed scientific journal; achieve consensus on efficacy of approach. • Provide training resources for future adoption. Create open -source tools and methodologies that are accessible and free for all public agencies throughout the U.S. In the longer term, we believe our SWNM approach will create enabling conditions that lead to hundreds of connected smart ponds that treat billions of gallons of runoff that flows into the IRL and watersheds throughout Florida. We also seethe potential for the SWNM concept to be integrated into regional watershed planning processes and used for implementing projects across the U.S. and beyond. To learn more about TNC's Brightstorm program, visit brightstorm.org or email brightstorm@tnc.org. Brightstorm [COUNTY LETTERHEAD] November 18, 2025 The Honorable Ben Albritton, President The Florida Senate 404 South Monroe Street Tallahassee, FL 32399 The Honorable Daniel Perez, Speaker The Florida House of Representatives 402 South Monroe Street Tallahassee, FL 32399 Re: Indian River County's Support for The Nature Conservancy Runoff to Resilience Pilot Project Dear President Albritton and Speaker Perez: On behalf of the Indian River County Board of County Commissioners, I am writing to express our support for The Nature Conservancy's Runoff to Resilience Pilot Project. We respectfully urge your support for the requested legislative appropriation to begin this groundbreaking work. Siting the project within the Indian River Lagoon watershed is both fitting and strategic. As one of Florida's most significant yet impaired water bodies, the Lagoon presents an ideal setting to pilot innovative solutions with far-reaching benefits. While the Lagoon is critically important to our region, given it provides an estimated annual economic value of $28.3 billion, the outcomes of this project have the potential to inform and improve stormwater management practices across the entire state. The Runoff to Resilience Pilot Project will demonstrate scalable science -based approaches to reducing nutrient runoff, improving water quality, mitigating flood risks, and supporting economic resilience. It exemplifies the kind of forward -thinking investment that aligns with Florida's priorities for innovative technologies and solutions that support water quality initiatives, operational efficiency, and overall performance. We are proud to partner with The Nature Conservancy and fully support state funding for this effort. Thank you for your thoughtful consideration of this request. Sincerely, Chairman Indian River County Commission 238 Runoff to Resilmi Pilot Project Kylie Yanchula, Indian River County James Byrne, The Nature Conservancy Tuesday, November 18, 2025 11,;�ature , Conservancy 41 ature Conservancy Request: Commission Support for The Nature --- 0 Conservancy's Legislative Appropriation Request Purpose: Equip a Smart Watershed Pilot Project in Indian River County Smart pdnO­[,,stOrwwatururnff and ra,',edth­ah 2 3 11/18/2025 Item 13.F.1. Indian River County74M R Partnership Urban stormwater runoff is key contributor to water quality decline in the Indian River Lagoon Longstanding and trusted relationships with partners across the watershed Ideal conditions for Pilot implementation Opportunity to close the County's asset digitization gaps 5 6lndian River County 6 Th�NaYure Conservancy ® Continuous Monitoring and Adaptive Control (CMAC) A i, __ db 10 years of testing & implementation along with advancements in reliability and performance 2 billion data points collected, 200 million ' control decisions made, 7 billion gallons of wet weather flows captured 6 Pilot Project Coi,,,,,.,.i4.� Partner with 3 HOAs in Indian River County Monitor and analyze results in conjunction with the University of Florida Establish smart stormwater technology as a trusted source of nutrient removal for BMAP compliance Expand technology throughout the Indian River Lagoon watershed and beyond TheNature I Conservancy `+ Th -Nature Conservancy 0 ry n. TheNature Conservancy Indian River County, Florida *,�xtoAs MEMORANDUM 13-H-1. Indian River County Administration Complex 1801 27th Street Vero Beach, Florida 32960 indianriver.gov File ID: 25-1076 Type: Department Staff Report Meeting Date: 11/18/2025 TO: The Honorable Board of County Commissioners THROUGH: John A. Titkanich, Jr., County Administrator THROUGH: Michael C. Zito, Deputy County Administrator Chris Hicks, Assistant County Attorney Beth Powell, Parks, Recreation & Conservation Director FROM: Wendy Swindell, Parks, Recreation & Conservation Assistant Director DATE: October 28, 2025 SUBJECT: Consideration of a Sale Agreement for the Purchase of the 36.99 -acre Winter Beach 73rd site through the Environmental Lands Acquisition Bond BACKGROUND On March 8, 2022, the County Administrator provided the Indian River County Board of County Commissioners (BCC) with a proposed resolution authorizing an Environmental Land Bond Referendum for the November 8, 2022, ballot. Resolution 2022-016 was passed by majority vote. The Resolution calls for a Bond Referendum Election for the issuance of general obligation bonds as follows: "To acquire and permanently preserve environmentally significant lands to restore the Indian River Lagoon, protect water resources, natural areas, wildlife habitat, drinking water resources, and construct public access improvements related thereto, shall Indian River County be authorized to issue general obligation bonds up to $50,000,000, maturing within 20 years from each issuance, not exceeding the legal maximum interest rate, payable from ad valorem taxes, with full public disclosure of all spending through annual independent audits." The BCC established the Environmental Land Acquisition Panel (ELAP) as a nine -member group to review information provided during the application process and provide recommendations to the BCC regarding the prioritization of the acquisition of environmentally sensitive lands. The ELAP has held twenty meetings between August of 2023 and September of 2025. The County's environmental bond process allows the public to nominate properties for acquisition at any time during the year. Each nomination period is six months, at which time that period closes and nominated properties are ranked by the ELAP. The close of the first ranking period was on August 31, 2024. Throughout the process, staff and consultants have reached out to landowners to determine which parcels had owners wanting to have their property considered for acquisition through the environmental bond process ("willing sellers"). Owners of parcels nominated by the public were contacted via letter, email and telephone to determine whether the owner was a willing seller. The initial nomination period identified twenty-three nominations with willing sellers. Of these twenty-three nominations, sixteen nominations were submitted as Indian River County, Florida Page 1 of 5 Printed on 11/13/2025 powba L2gistMar'rr. "fee simple" nominations (County purchases the property outright), and seven were nominated as potential conservation easements. On January 14, 2025, the ELAP met to rank the nominated properties. Following the ELAP ranking, the properties were "Tiered" to prioritize the process of negotiations with landowners. On March 11, 2025, the Board of County Commissioners approved the ELAP Final Ranking and Tiered List of Nominations. At this meeting the Board authorized staff to pursue Tier 1 Ranked Properties for acquisition consistent with the ELAP's recommendation, including the authority to make conditional offers of purchase and sale subject to approval by the Board of County Commissioners, and in accordance with Florida Statute Section 125.355. Staff moved forward with the next steps in the land acquisition process, which include obtaining two independent appraisals for the subject property, and to undertake purchase negotiations with the landowner based on these appraisals. Winter Beach 73rd is a Board approved Tier 1 property. The 36.99 -acre property includes two parcels located to the south of 73' Street, adjacent to the Indian River Lagoon. The property to the south is owned by the St. John's River Water Management District (SJRWMD). This site contains a mangrove impoundment (approximately 19.45 acres) and 17.54 acres of undeveloped uplands. The property zoning is RS -3 (Single - Family Residential up to 3 units per acre) & RS -1 (Single -Family Residential up to 1 unit per acre). The environmental conditions on the property are detailed in the report prepared by Water & Air Research, Inc. which is included as Attachment 1. The following summarizes the parcel information for the Winter Beach 73rd property. Parcel Size (Acres Owner Zoning Tax Assessed Value 32390300000003000001.0 24.99 John M. Luther, as 17.54 acres $564,885.00 Trustee of the S-3 (balance William M. Luther is RS -1) Irrevocable Trust 32390200000500000001.0 12.00 John M. Luther, as S-1 $30,600.00 Trustee of the William M. Luther Irrevocable Trust The proposed use of the property would be for environmental conservation and passive public recreation. Based on historic land uses in this area, it is presumed that prior to conversion to a mangrove impoundment, much of the site was an herbaceous saltmarsh community at lower elevations and maritime hammock towards the western limits of the property. The acquisition of land in close proximity to the Indian River Lagoon (IRL) aligns with the Bond Resolution as there would be many lagoon benefits provided including: (1) eliminating the potential for development in proximity to sensitive habitat in the IRL; (2) creating habitat adjacent to the IRL for wildlife that would use wetland habitat not present on the existing property; and (3) a resilient project that may be designed to withstand changing environmental conditions, thereby affording increased protection for the IRL. Because the property is valued at more than $500,000, the County's Environmental Land Program Guide and the State statutes require that two independent appraisals be obtained to determine an "approved appraised value" for the property. Staff obtained appraisals from Tuttle, Armfield & Wagner Appraisal Research, Inc. (TAW) and Boyle & Drake (B&D). The appraisals completed by TAW and B&D are included as Attachment 2. Indian River County, Florida Page 2 of 5 Printed on 11/13/2025 pow( hr Legistar,T" The County's acquisition consultant coordinated with the landowner, and a sale price was negotiated. The owner has executed a contract for sale in the amount of $1,590,000.00 (Attachment 3). Appraiser Appraised Value ($ )Approved Negotiated % of Appraised Price ($) Appraised Value ($) Value AW $1,455,000 $1,640,000 $1,590,000 97% &D 1$1,640,000 Pursuant to Section 125.355, F.S., once a landowner has accepted and executed a Purchase Agreement the appraisal results and other confidential information may be released via Public Notice. The County completed the Public Notice of the availability for public review of the Winter Beach 73rd appraisal on September 24, 2025. ANALYSIS When a county exercises its confidentiality right in purchasing real property, Section 125.355, F.S. requires that the County approve the purchase at a public meeting not less than 30 days after the appraisals are released and public notice of the meeting is given. Consideration of the contract agreement at the November 4, 2025, Board meeting meets the requirements of Chapter 125, F.S. The purchase contract for the Winter Beach 73rd property is summarized as follows: Purchaser: Indian River Board of County Commissioners Seller: John M. Luther, as Trustee of the William M. Luther Irrevocable Trust Total Price: $1,590,000.00 Other Costs: Estimated to be $80,100 (closing fees, appraisal costs, consultants acquisition fee, due diligence assessments) Due Diligence: 60 Days from the execution of agreement Cl sing: 60 days from the end of the due diligence period At the October 21, 2025, meeting, the ELAP voted unanimously to recommend that the Board of County Commissioners approve the purchase of the property under the terms of the sale agreement. Should the Board approve the purchase contract there is a 60 -day due diligence period. The due diligence period includes a thorough review of the property's natural, legal, and financial characteristics to ensure it aligns with conservation goals and regulatory requirements. This work typically includes ordering a detailed title search to confirm ownership and identify any encumbrances; conducting a current survey to delineate boundaries accurately; and completing a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment to identify any hazardous materials or potential contamination, and completion of a baseline report to document current site conditions. Staff will coordinate the completion of a schematic depicting a conceptual (high level) plan for public access improvements that may be completed for the site. At the conclusion of the due diligence period, assuming that no issues are identified that would adversely affect the County's intended use of the property, the results of the due diligence and the conceptual plan will be presented to the Board for their consideration of the execution of the final purchase agreement. Should the property be acquired, the County will pursue cost -share reimbursement of bond acquisition funds used for land purchase through a variety of opportunities such as Florida Inland Navigation District, SJRWMD (Critical Wetlands acquisition program), Florida Communities Trust, Florida Forever, Land and Water Conservation Fund, and the Coastal Partner Initiative. The opportunities for grant funding towards public access improvements and restoration of habitat include many State and federal sources, including the Land and Indian River County, Florida Page 3 of 5 Printed on 11/13/2025 pow T4 1y Legistar'rr Water Conservation Fund, the Indian River Lagoon Council, the Coastal Partner Initiative, and the Florida Inland Navigation District. BUDGETARY IMPACT Funds, in the amount of $1,590,000, are budgeted and available in the Land Acquisition Series 2024 Bond/All Land account, number 15514639-066110. PREVIOUS BOARD ACTIONS 20-1630 06/09/2020 Letter to BCC Re: 2020 Environmental Lands Bond Referendum and Trust for Public Land Report 22-0043 02/01/2022 Presentation from Ken Grudens, Executive Director, Indian River Land Trust, Re: Proposed 2022 Environmental Land Bond Referendum 22-0091 02/01/2022 Proposed 2022 Environmental Land Bond Referendum 22-0194 03/08/2022 Environmental Land Bond Referendum 22-0803 09/20/2022 Updated Draft Environmental Lands Program Guide for the November 2022 Environmental Land Bond Referendum 23-0202 03/07/2023 Indian River County Environmental Bond - Review Committee Selection Process 23-0264 03/28/2023 District #3 Appointee to the Environmental Lands Acquisition Panel (ELAP) 23-0288 04/04/2023 District 4 Appointment to Environmental Lands Acquisition Panel (ELAP) 23-0403 05/16/2023 Appointment of James L. Connaughton ELAP 23-0492 06/06/2023 District #3 Appointee to the Environmental Lands Acquisition Panel (ELAP) 23-0626 07/11/2023 Environmental Lands Acquisition Panel (ELAP) 23-0875 09/26/2023 Award of RFP 2023064 for Ecological Services in Support of the Environmental Land Acquisition Bond Process 23-1155 02/06/2024 Environmental Land Bond - Introduction to the ArcGIS Hub/Dashboard 23-1057 12/12/2023 Environmental Lands Acquisition Panel (ELAP) Recommendation for Finalization of Draft Environmental Lands Program (ELP) Guide 25-0193 02/25/2025 ELAP - District 4 Appointee - Member Resignation & Appointment 25-0319 03/11/2025 ELAP Ranking List of Environmental Lands Acquisition Properties for the Initial Nomination Period 25-0475 04/22/2025 Water & Air Research, Inc. Work Order Number 1, Amendment 2 for Ecological Services in Support of the Environmental Land Acquisition Board 25-0921 09/23/2025 Environmental Lands Acquisition Status Update Regarding a Purchase Contract - Durrance Place 25-0922 09/23/2025 Environmental Lands Acquisition Status Update Regarding a Purchase Contract - Hale Grove Properties 25-0946 10/07/2025 Consideration of a Sale Agreement for the Purchase of the 21.89 acre Hale Grove site through the Environmental Lands Acquisition Bond 25-1002 10/21/2025 Environmental Lands Acquisition Status Update Regarding a Purchase Contract - Jungle Trail Island Club Manor 25-1010 10/21/2025 Environmental Lands Acquisition Status Update Regarding a Purchase Contract - Winter Beach 73rd 25-1056 11/04/2025 Consideration of a Sale Agreement for the Purchase of the 19.6 acre Jungle Trail Island Club Manor site through the Environmental Lands Acquisition Bond POTENTIAL FUTURE BOARD ACTIONS Board consideration to approve the closing documents and associated materials for the purchase of the "Winter Beach 73rd" project under the County Environmental Bond Program. Indian River County, Florida Page 4 of 5 Printed on 11/13/2025 pow 41V 1 Legistar" STRATEGIC PLAN ALIGNMENT Quality of Life OTHER PLAN ALIGNMENT N/A STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff respectfully recommends that the Board of County Commissioners approve the "Winter Beach 73rd" Contract Agreement, and authorize staff to proceed with due diligence period and close of the purchase. Indian River County, Florida Page 5 of 5 Printed on 11/13/2025 pawed 4Y LegistarTM F, yy q � a 71r Prepared by: Water $ Air Research, Inc. 6821 Southwest Archer Road Gainesville, Florida 32608 Project No. 24-6442 -441momw TM water & air RESEARCH, INC. 245 TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page 1.0 WINTER BEACH 73RD ST PROPERTY 1 8.0 OTHER CONSIDERATIONS 9 9.0 SUMMARY 10 1 Winter Beach 73rd Assessment.do —111224 246 1.1 LOCATION 1.2 SIZE 1.3 CURRENT AND FUTURE ZONING 1.4 PENDING ZONING CHANGES AND SPECIAL OVERLAY 1 1 1 DISTRICTS 1 2.0 VEGETATIVE COMMUNITIES 1 2.1 LAND USE AND LAND COVER 1 2.2 SOILS 3 2.3 HISTORICAL IMAGERY REVIEW 3 2.4 OFFSITE CONTINUITY OF NATURAL COMMUNITIES 5 3.0 RARE SPECIES 6 4.0 WETLANDS 7 4.1 AEREAL EXTENT AND CONNECTIVITY 7 4.2 ALTERATIONS 7 5.0 WATER RESOURCES 8 5.1 AQUIFER RECHARGE 8 5.2 WATER QUALITY 8 5.3 WATER ATTENUATION 8 6.0 CORRIDORS AND GREENWAYS 8 7.0 RESTORATION, LAND MANAGEMENT, HAZARDOUS MATERIALS, AND RECREATION 9 7.1 RESTORATION POTENTIAL 9 7.2 LAND MANAGEMENT POTENTIAL 9 7.3 HAZARDOUS MATERIALS 9 7.4 RECREATION AND EDUCATION OPPORTUNITIES 9 8.0 OTHER CONSIDERATIONS 9 9.0 SUMMARY 10 1 Winter Beach 73rd Assessment.do —111224 246 LIST OF TABLES Table Table 1 The amount of each altered land use type or natural community type on the Winter Beach 73`d St Property from the Florida Cooperative Landcover (CLC) Map (2023). Table 2 The animal species listed endangered, threatened, or that are tracked by Florida Natural Areas Inventory (FNAI) that have the potential to occur on the Winter Beach 73rd St Property. Table 3 The plant species listed endangered, threatened, or that are tracked by FNAI that have the po- tential to occur on the Winter Beach 73rd St Property. LIST OF FIGURES Figure Figure 1 The Location of the Winter Beach 73rd St Property within Indian River County, Florida Figure 2 The Florida CLC Map on the Winter Beach 73rd St Property Indian River County, Florida Figure 3 The Land Use and Natural Communities on the Winter Beach 73rd St Property Indian River County, Florida Figure 4 The Under -represented Natural Communities Mapped by FNAI for the Florida Forever Statewide Environmental Lands Acquisition Program That occur on the Winter Beach 73rd St Property Indian River County, Florida Figure 5 The Soil Types Found on the Winter Beach 73rd St Property Indian River County, Florida Figure 6 The Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission's Fish and Wildlife Research Institute Terrestrial Resources Geographic Information System Web Mapping Results for Species Ob- servations near the Assessment Property Figure 7 The Biodiversity Resource Priorities Model (CLIP 4.0) on the Winter Beach 73rd St Property Indian River County, Florida Figure 8 The National Wetlands Inventory (NWI) Wetlands and Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Flood Zones on the Winter Beach 73rd St Property Indian River County, Florida Figure 9 Groundwater Recharge Areas Critical to Springs, Sinks, Aquifers, Natural Systems, or Water Supply on the Winter Beach 73rd St Property Indian River County, Florida Figure 10 The Winter Beach 73rd St Property and the Conserved Lands in the Vicinity, Indian River County, Florida Figure 11 The Landscape Resource Priorities Model (CLIP 4.0) on the Winter Beach 73rd St Property Indian River County, Florida iiWinter Beach 73rd Assessment.docx-111224 247 1.0 WINTER BEACH 73RD ST PROPERTY The Winter Beach 73rd St Property, Environmental Bond Nomination Number 24, was nominated by a local resident with the anticipated acquisition type of Fee Simple. 1.1 LOCATION The assessment property is in eastern Indian River County on two Tax Parcels #32390300000003000001.0 and #32390200000500000001.0 (Figure 1) and is on the west bank of the Indian River Lagoon. U.S. Highway 1 is approximately 530m to the southwest and the site is approximately 1.7 miles south of the intersection with Highway 510 (Bridge Boulevard) in be- tween 73rd Street and 69h Street. The address listed for the property is 3005 73rd Street. 1.2 SIZE The property totals approximately 36 acres and is an irregular shaped polygon that is roughly 500m wide by 400m north -south. 1.3 CURRENT AND FUTURE ZONING The current land use zoning on the western portion of the property is RS -3 - Single -Family Resi- dential District (up to 3 units/acre) and the eastern portion is RS -1 - Single -Family Residential District (up to 1 unit/acre) (Version 10/07/2024). The future land use zoning on the western portion is L-1: Low -Density Residential -1 (3 Units/Acre) and on the eastern portion is C-2: Conservation - 2 (1 Unit/40 Acres) (Version 3/28/2024). 1.4 PENDING ZONING CHANGES AND SPECIAL OVERLAY DISTRICTS An inquiry to the Senior Planner for Long -Range Planning for Indian River County, Cindy Thur- man, revealed there are no pending zoning changes, and she was unaware of any Special Overlay Districts affecting the parcel. 2.0 VEGETATIVE COMMUNITIES The Winter Beach 73rd Street property is within two major vegetative community types within Indian River County. The eastern side of the property resides in the Indian River Lagoon and associated estuarine wetlands portion of the county, and the western portion is within the south Florida flatwoods ecological community that occurs in two distinct regions of Indian River County, east and west. The Winter Beach 73rd Sreet property is within the eastern portion of the general ecological community, and predevelopment, consisted of pine flatwoods intermixed with shallow wetlands. This property is a little east of the Atlantic Coastal Sand Ridge and the scrub communities it harbors. 2.1 LAND USE AND LAND COVER There were two natural community types, and two altered land use types identified on the property from the 2023 Florida Cooperative Landcover Map (CLC) (Figure 2). The 41 percent of the site identified as Mixed Hardwood -Coniferous was changed to the altered community type Succes- sional Hardwood Forest after reviewing historical aerial imagery and it was determined that half Winter Beach 73rd Assessenent.dou-111224 248 of the polygon had been cleared of vegetation and converted to citrus grove that was fallow by the 1970s. The remaining portion of the polygon appeared to be wet and/or mesic flatwoods in the 1940s aerial that has now succeeded into SHF because of eliminating fire on the landscape. Ap- proximately 55 percent of the site, the eastern portion, was identified as Mangrove Swamp. There was a small area, 5 percent of the property, typed as Mesic Flatwoods that may have an infestation of invasive exotic trees. The CLC map Figure 3 and Table 1 present the acres of each land use and natural community type on the property. Table 1. The amount of each altered land use type or natural community type on the Winter Beach 73rd St property from the Florida Cooperative Landcover Map (2023). Land Use/Natural Community Acres % Cover Type Up/Wet State Rank Mangrove Swamp 19.45 54.5% Natural Wetland Secure S4 Mixed Hardwood -Coniferous (SHF) 14.56 40.8% Altered Upland not ranked Mesic Flatwoods 1.65 4.6% Natural Upland Secure S4 Residential, Med. Density 0.02 0.1% Altered Upland not ranked Total Altered 14.6 40.9% Total Natural 21.1 59.1% Total Upland 16.2 45.5% Total Wetland 19.5 54.5% *The level of disturbance within each onsite natural community has not been assessed. **The community in parentheses (successional hardwood forest) is a correction to the map based on aerial interpretation. Mangrove and estuarine habitats are dominant on the eastern portion of the property. Character- istic species of mangrove swamps include red mangrove, black mangrove, white mangrove, and buttonwood. Brazilian pepper can be a common component particularly within disturbed estua- rine communities. In the 1940s aerial there appears to be some saltmarsh onsite and typical salt- marsh within the county is an herbaceous community that occurs in the portion of the coastal zone affected by tides and seawater but protected from large waves. Dominant species often in- clude saltmarsh cordgrass, saltwort, glasswort, salt grass, seaside oxeye daisy, Carolina sea lav- ender, marsh fimbry, shoreline seapurslane, marsh elder, and saltgrass. Mesic and wet flatwoods were likely dominant natural communities on the western portion of the property. Typical trees and shrubs in flatwoods community include slash pine, longleaf pine, gallberry, and saw palmetto with often grasses such as creeping bluestem, lopsided indiangrass, and pineland threeawn. There were no regionally rare natural community types (e.g., scrub, scrubby flatwoods, maritime hammock) identified on the property from the CLC map or from a review of current and historical aerial imagery. Mesic flatwoods is becoming increasingly rarer in the eastern portion of the county and the area mapped as mesic flatwoods on this property appears to be dominated by possibly an invasive exotic tree, Australian pine (Casuarina spp.). Figure 4 shows the under -represented natural communities mapped by FNAI for the Florida For- ever statewide environmental lands acquisition program that occur on and near the property. The portion of the property that is covered in mangrove (approximately 55 percent) is ranked a 2 Winter Beach 73rd Assessment.doc 111224 249 Priority 3 and the small area identified as mesic flatwoods was ranked Priority 2 (scale is Priority 1 through 4 with 1 being the highest priority; O=no rank). The remaining upland portion of the prop- erty received no priority ranking. 2.2 SOILS The soil types found on the Winter Beach 73rd St Property are represented in Figure 5. The two most prevalent soil types are Jupiter (17 acres) and Riomar (15 acres). The Jupiter series consists of shallow and very shallow, poorly and very poorly drained soils that formed in a thin bed of sandy marine sediments overlying limestone bedrock. Native vegetation on Jupiter soils often con- sists of cabbage palm, laurel oak, water oak, scattered south Florida slash pine, red mulberry, and redbay with an understory of marlberry, waxmyrtle, wild coffee, greenbriars, ferns, longleaf un- iola, Eastern gamagrass, chalky bluestem, maidencane, and switchgrass. The wetter area vegeta- tion is dominated by cabbage palm, pond cypress, red maple, dahoon holly, water oak, and stran- gler fig with an understory of pickerelweed, arrowhead, ferns, swamp dogwood, lizards tail, maid- encane, and switchgrass. The Riomar soil series are very poorly drained, moderately deep, very slowly permeable soils that formed in loamy or clayey tidal deposits. They occur on nearly level mangrove islands and swamps and are continuously saturated with saline water. Dominant natural vegetation typically consists of red, black and white mangrove, with some areas of sea rocket, saltwort, perennial glass - wort, seashore saltgrass, and seashore paspalum. 2.3 HISTORICAL IMAGERY REVIEW Some of the aerial photographs reviewed for this assessment can be found in the Appendix. 1943 May 1 (UF Map Library - Approximately 5.3 of the total 35.7 acres is citrus grove, the west side of the property, the sites remaining acreage (30.4) contains natural communities that appear relatively intact - A ditch bisects the onsite citrus grove diagonally and appears to terminate in the open marsh east of the mixed forest - The citrus is contiguous with offsite groves to the west and south - Adjacent to and east of the citrus is what appears to be a tree canopied mixed forest and open pine flatwoods adjacent to and west of the saltmarsh - The eastern half of the site is open saltmarsh, with some trees or shrubs along the Indian River, likely including mangrove - The relatively intact saltmarsh and pine flatwoods communities extend north and south offsite - South of the site there is a bridge that crosses the Indian River at what is currently 69th Street and extends east over to the Hole in the Wall Island and eventually meets up with Jungle Trail on the east side of the Indian River 1951 April 4 (UF May Library - The natural communities are relatively unchanged from 1943 - The canopy of the central band of mixed forest and pine flatwoods appear denser - The eastern marsh is still open with a few woody trees or shrubs along the river Winter Beach 73rd Assessment.docx-111224 250 Suppression of the natural fire regime in conjunction with increased citrus groves and agricul- tural development of the surrounding pinelands could have impacted the historical open nature of the pine flatwoods The diagonal ditch is barely visible due to an increase in woody vegetation The former bridge that extended east from what is now 69d' St no longer crosses over to the Hole in the Wall Island 1970 December 29 (UF Map Library - The citrus grove is gone and the new vegetative aerial signature of the 5.3 acres appears very similar to the mixed forest to the east - Land disturbances in the mixed hardwoods and pine flatwoods appears to have occurred since 1951, possible timbering - The dark circular signature near the center of the southern boundary is the start of an infestation of the invasive exotic tree, Australian pine - The formerly open pine flatwoods on the western half of the site is now forested with hard- woods - Mangroves have recruited into the formerly open saltmarsh - The formerly open saltmarsh has a dike and ditch encompassing a mosquito control impound- ment - The construction of mosquito impoundments (during the 1950s and 60s) along the Indian River has occurred throughout the region and adjacent to this site 1994 March 17 (Google Earth Pro) - The entire site has a woody canopy (forested) of various heights, densities, and species - There is some open water in ditches crossing the mosquito impoundment - The Australian pine infestation has increased in size and density - The formerly open saltmarsh appears to be mostly mangrove trees - A ditch has been excavated along the north and southeast property lines, the ditch along the north boundary is fairly wide and likely doubles as a linear storm retention pond - 73rd St is a dirt path that runs along the western half of the north boundary - Some oyster bars are visible in the Indian River along the southeastern boundary for the first time (likely visible due to aerial photograph quality and low tide conditions) 2003 June 3 (Google Earth Pro) - The entire site is forested - The Australian pine infestation (dark green circular signature that crosses over the southern boundary line) does not appear to be spreading - Mangrove canopy cover has increased and the only open water visible is in the perimeter ditch - Mangrove and/or Brazilian pepper have recruited west into some areas of mixed hardwoods and pine flatwoods ecotone - There is a housing development offsite along the northwestern corner and homes have been constructed offsite near the southern boundary 2005 July 7 (Google Earth Pro) - The Australian pine tree infestation has been cut down, and possibly some vegetation in the mixed hardwoods area (likely invasive exotic species) 4 winter Beach 73rd Assesstnent.docx-111224 251 - Color aerials and higher quality resolution indicate the occurrence of cabbage palms, oak trees (e.g., live oak), mangroves and Australian pine onsite - The mangrove canopy is a little less dense as ditches and spoil mounds are visible - Three oyster bars are visible in the river - The adjacent offsite former citrus groves are fallow 2010 December 3 (Google Earth Pro) - The Australian pine infestation has grown back in the same area (dark green circular signature), Lidar and other sources don't show any major topography changes in the area and soils are mapped the same as the adjacent areas - The mixed hardwoods signature includes areas of oak and cabbage palm, deciduous species, and likely some invasive exotic species - The tree canopy is dense in the mosquito impoundment, and very little open water is visible with most ditches and dikes hidden under canopy - Oyster bars are visible - The adjacent offsite former citrus groves are succeeding into forest 2017 January(Google Earth Pro) - The Australian pine infestation has been disturbed, many trees have been blown over, as well as scattered Australian pine to the northwest in the mixed hardwood area and possibly other species as well - The mangrove signature is distinct, and it extends west beyond the mosquito impoundment dike - The mosquito impoundment dike appears maintained - Three exposed oyster bars are visible, the same ones first observed in 1994, possibly some other oyster bars (dark areas) are visible in the same area, but beneath the water - There is no sign there was offsite citrus groves which are now completely forested 2024 May 29 (Google Earth Pro) - The Australian pine patch looks intact, slightly larger with no sign of fallen trees - The current CLC map designation for the invasive exotic Australian pine polygon is Mesic Flatwoods - What was open pine flatwoods or citrus groves in 1943 is indistinguishable from what was called mixed hardwoods in 1943 - The former offsite citrus groves now have a similar aerial signature - The saltmarsh, open in 1943, is a mosquito impoundment that is now a closed canopy man- grove swamp forest - Three exposed oyster bars are visible, they might be slightly reduced in extent than when first observed in 1994 2.4 OFFSITE CONTINUITY OF NATURAL COMMUNITIES The mosquito impoundment has remained naturally forested and is contiguous with offsite man- grove forest dominated mosquito impoundments to the north and south. This narrow band of man- grove forest extends largely unbroken 1,200m north to Marsha Ln and extends approximately an- other 3,400m south to North Harbor Village Drive. Residential properties and altered uplands bor- der the remaining portions of the property to the northwest, west, and southwest. Indian River is to the east. Winter Beseh 73rd Assesstnent.dwc 111224 252 3.0 RARE SPECIES Table 2 includes a list of the animal species and Table 3 includes the plant species that have the potential to occur onsite that are considered endangered, threatened, or rare as listed by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS), Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FWC), Florida Natural Areas Inventory (FNAI) and the Florida Department of Agriculture. A search using the FNAI Biodiversity Matrix Map Server, and the FWS Information for Planning and Consulta- tion (IPaQ Tool Resource List was performed for listed species that may potentially occur within the Project Site. These lists were reviewed and only the species that have a potential to occur within the habitats available onsite were included. Additionally, species that are tracked by FNAI or state listed that occur within Indian River County that were not included in the Biodiversity Matrix search, but potential habitat occurs onsite, were included in Tables 2 and 3. The majority of the potential rare animals and plants listed for this property are species that can occur in mangrove wetlands, estuarine ditches/canals, or disturbed forested communities. Table 2. The animal species listed endangered, threatened, or tracked by FNAI that have the potential to occur on the Winter Beach 73rd St property. Global State Federal State Species Name Bird Mycteria americana Nyctanassa violacea Nycticorax nycticorax Setophaga discolor paludicola Setophaga kirtlandii Fish Ctenogobius stigmaturus Gobiomorus dormitor Microphis brachyurus Rivulus marmoratus Common Name Rank Rank Status Listin Listing Harrisia simpsonii (fragrans) Simpson's prickly apple G2 S2 wood stork G4 S2 T, PDL FT yellow -crowned night -heron (nests) G5 S3 N N black -crowned night -heron (nests) G5 S3 N N Florida prairie warbler G5T3 S3 N N Kirtland's Warbler G3 S1 N N spottail goby G2 S2 N N bigmouth sleeper G4 S2 N N opossum pipefish G4G5 S2 SC N mangrove rivulus G4G5 S3 Sc N Reptile Drymarchon couperi eastern indigo snake G3 S2? T FT Gopherus polyphemus gopher tortoise G3 S3 N ST Table 3. The plant species listed endangered, threatened, or tracked by FNAI that have the potential to occur on the Winter Beach 73rd St nronerty. Global State Federal State Species Name Common Name Rank Rank Status Listing Harrisia simpsonii (fragrans) Simpson's prickly apple G2 S2 E E Opuntia stricta erect prickly pear G4? S3S4 N T Tillandsia balbisiana Balbis' airplant G4G5 S3 N T Tillandsia fasciculata common wild -pine G5 S4? N E Tillandsia utriculata spreading airplant G5 S3 N E 6 Winter Beech 73rd Assessment.docx-111224 253 Figure 6 shows The Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission's Fish and Wildlife Re- search Institute Terrestrial Resources Geographic Information System web mapping results for species observations near the assessment property. Note these observations are a collection of spe- cies documented in the vicinity by various means and are a very incomplete representation of what may occur in the area or that may utilize this property. The resources selected for documented occurrences in the area included Black Bear Calls, Black Bear Telemetry, Eagle Nesting, Panther Mortality, Panther Telemetry, Scrub Jay, Wading Bird Rookeries, and opportunistic Wildlife Ob- servations. There are no documented wildlife sightings on the Winter Beach 73rd St property (Fig- ure 6). The closest documented sightings are of Florida scrub jay and Florida scrub lizard along the Atlantic Coastal Sand Ridge to the west of the property. Figure 7 shows the Critical Lands and Waters Identification Project (CLIP version 4.0) Biodiver- sity Resource Priorities model, which combines several conservation priorities models including the Strategic Habitat Conservation Areas for Florida Forever, Vertebrate Richness, Potential Rare Species Habitat, and Priority Natural Communities Core Data layers. The entire property has a priority rank, with the eastern half of the property mapped as Priority 3 (Priority 1 has the highest conservation priority on a scale from 1 to 5), a large proportion of the western half is listed as Priority 4, and the small area called mesic flatwoods in the CLC map was ranked Priority 2 (Fig- ure 7). 4.0 WETLANDS Approximately 55 percent of the site is covered in wetlands according to the CLC map. The parcel is within the Indian River Lagoon watershed. 4.1 AEREAL EXTENT AND CONNECTIVITY From the CLC map the eastern half of the property (19 acres) was mapped as mangrove (Table 1). These wetlands form a linear feature that extends north and south of the site and parallels the Indian River Lagoon. It is very likely that some of what has been called Mixed Hardwood -Coniferous contains some remnant wetland communities given that it was historically wet and mesic flat - woods. Figure 8 shows the wetlands, waterbodies, and flood zones located on the property from the Na- tional Wetlands Inventory (NWI) and Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) maps. The NWI map identified 19.4 -acres of Estuarine wetlands, 55 percent of the site. The NWI map has an additional 0.3 acres of ditches delineated. 4.2 ALTERATIONS This parcel was historically a portion of a large expanse of salt marsh that was subsequently im- pounded with a series of berms and ditches and became part of the North Winter Beach Impound- ment (Indian River County Impoundment #28). In the 1950s and 60s the Indian River Mosquito Control District impounded approximately 2,600 acres of the 4,500 acres of estuarine marshes in Indian River County. This site has one of those impoundments with an earthen dike around former saltmarsh. Impoundment impacts include widespread changes in plant and animal communities, invasion of nonnative plants on the dike, primarily Brazilian pepper trees; loss of access to wet- lands used for breeding, feeding and refuge by fishes and invertebrates. Additionally, 7 Winter Beach 73rd Assessment.dom-111224 254 ditches/canals have also been excavated along the north and south boundaries of this property. Undoubtedly these features have influenced the local hydrology. Since the 1940s the saltmarsh onsite has converted to mangrove forest. Invasive exotic plant infestations, particularly Brazilian pepper, could be high especially in the disturbed areas, along the berms and spoil mounds. 5.0 WATER RESOURCES 5.1 AQUIFER RECHARGE Figure 9 shows the priority ranking for aquifer recharge on the project site. This is a broad measure focusing on the recharge of springs, sinks, aquifers, natural systems, and water supply. Areas of potential recharge to the Floridan and surficial aquifers were determined from soil hydraulic con- ductivity, proximity to karst features, depth to water, and overburden (Florida Forever Conserva- tion Needs Assessment, Tech Report 2023). The site has a priority rank of Priority 4 or Priority 6for aquifer recharge (the ranks range 1 through 6 with Priority 1 being the highest priority; O=no rank) (Figure 9). 5.2 WATER QUALITY The wetlands onsite have the potential to aid in maintaining water quality and in situ water purifi- cation of stormwater entering the Indian River Lagoon system from the uplands. Onsite water quality could potentially be improved by assuring that the impounded wetland is allowed to regu- larly flush with the tides allowing for the biological and chemical processes within waters influ- enced by natural tidal exchange. 5.3 WATER ATTENUATION The wetland communities can help to store water and reduce the speed of water as it flows over the landscape. 6.0 CORRIDORS AND GREENWAYS The Winter Beach 73rd Street Property is adjacent to the Indian River Lagoon and is one of the unacquired parcels of the Indian River Lagoon Blueway Florida Forever BOT project. This prop- erty is contiguous with the 19 -acre SJRWMD Windmiller Parcel to the south (Figure 10) along with a series of privately owned, undeveloped, mosquito impoundments to the north and south. Figure 11 shows the CLIP landscape priority ranking for the property. This model combines pri- orities from the Ecological Greenways and Landscape Integrity Core Data layers. No portion of this property was ranked a priority. Winter Beach 73rd Assessment.d=-111224 255 7.0 RESTORATION, LAND MANAGEMENT, HAZARDOUS MATERIALS, AND REC- REATION/EDUCATION OPPORTUNITIES 7.1 RESTORATION POTENTIAL Possible restoration of the onsite natural communities could include planting of native vegetation in the uplands, hydrologic enhancement of the wetland communities, salt marsh restoration, and invasive exotic plant species control. The alterations to the onsite hydrology would need to be more thoroughly assessed to determine the type and amount of restoration that may be beneficial and feasible. 7.2 LAND MANAGEMENT POTENTIAL There are several estuarine impoundment management strategies. Allowing or continuing to allow the tides to flush through the property helps to maintain black mangroves, supply habitat for the fish community including some of the rare listed species, provide a nursery for juvenile fish, and allow for natural biological and chemical processes inherent to estuarine systems. Any manage- ment of the waters within the impoundment would likely have to be in coordination with the Indian River Mosquito Control District. It appears that the North Winter Beach Impoundment is currently under a Rotational Impoundment Management (RIM) schedule. 7.3 HAZARDOUS MATERIALS There are no hazardous waste sites reported on the property from two online sources provided by the Florida Department Environmental Protection Division of Waste Management. Map Direct: https://ca.dep.state.fl.us/mapdirect/ Contamination Locator Map https://ca.dep.state.fl.us/mat)direct/?web- map=bdfa237157c7426a8f552e40a741685e DEP cleanup sites https://www.arcgis.com/apps/mapviewcr/index.html?web- map=316 f 774db3 f 7420faf54008608 faff64 7.4 RECREATION AND EDUCATION OPPORTUNITIES The process of establishing recreational opportunities will require inventorying the area to deter- mine appropriate locations for activities, collaborating with stakeholders, determining the desired objectives that recreation could provide, and identifying the financial costs and benefits of provid- ing the different types of opportunities. Some examples of potential recreation at this site include canoeing, bank fishing, pier fishing, wildlife viewing, and hiking. There is an existing City of Vero Beach owned canoe launch (69th Street kayak launch) south of the property that allows for easy access to explore the shoreline of the Winter Beach 73rd Street property. There is the potential for a walking trail that circumnavigates the property along the impoundment berm similar to the Toni Robinson Waterfront Trail to the north of this property. Educational kiosks describing the estuarine wetlands and how they relate to water quality within the Indian River Lagoon could be installed among many other educational opportunities. 8.0 OTHER CONSIDERATIONS The nominator of this parcel stated they have seen from this property "otters, osprey, owls, bobcat, and most likely numerous other species of wildlife." There is a conceptional subdivision for the far western portion with a proposed north to south cul-de-sac road lined with 21 lots. This 9 Winter Beach 73rd Assessment.d=-111224 256 nominated property is part of a group of parcels that have been nominated for acquisition and the total area equals approximately 98.7 acres. 9.0 SUMMARY The Winter Beach 73rd Street Property is a 36 -acre parcel nominated by a local resident, is con- tiguous with an existing conservation property, is within the Indian River Lagoon and Associated Wetlands portion of the county and has disturbed uplands and relatively intact forested wetland on the west bank of the Indian River Lagoon. The mangrove wetland has been impounded and there are additional ditches onsite. Invasive exotic species infestations are likely. A stormwater attenu- ation park and/or recreation facilities for the disturbed upland area are potential options for this site. 10 Winter Beach 73rd Assessment.doex-111224 257 FIGURES 258 ON kn N O �O N �lo N N o � co *.. O yZ CD a O N N Oj iV 7 N O N � NJ O 9 X E a m m LL N L M r U t0 m m d 3 N m C � Y C y d L (o m V Q ^^O O Z LL N LL O 0 LL CL a� co � ' a m am co o +J J c c — 3 SE 5 U) O -p E O CL M y U fo 'OL N o CCo CN O w W N (o U c v 0>.�. w � fn L 7 c L L O L >cUQ g L m O L o6 UU m o c L i 7 d0 0 � rr J m U d E ECD C v o v ' O N O M O d' O a. m.we U 'E ` > n m m PW c Z 3 C N o � co *.. O yZ CD a O N N Oj iV 7 N O N � NJ O 9 X E a m m LL N L M r U t0 m m d 3 N m C � Y C y d L (o m V Q ^^O O Z LL N LL O 0 LL CL a� co � ' a m am co o +J J c c — 3 SE 5 U) O -p E O CL M y U fo 'OL N o CCo CN O w W N (o U c v 0>.�. w � fn L 7 c L L O L >cUQ g L m O L o6 UU m o c L i 7 d0 0 � N J m U d E ECD C v o v ' O N O M O d' O Z N o � co *.. O yZ CD a O N N Oj iV 7 N O N � NJ O 9 X E a m m LL N L M r U t0 m m d 3 N m C � Y C y d L (o m V Q ^^O O Z LL N LL O 0 LL CL a� co � ' a m am co o +J J c c — 3 SE 5 U) O -p E O CL M y U fo 'OL N o CCo CN O w W N (o U c v 0>.�. w � fn L 7 c L L O L >cUQ g L m O L o6 UU m o c L i 7 d0 0 � 0 d v M ti M �lO N U Q n Q O N C p Nr E p Q c Q o U C m � C',U N...30� M.O0U N N r N� V C, N Q "O o N o C/ m N C m Q y c >m c y O N N w U U m N_ U oNCCNY.` E 7) Oo�a�� 'o O a V 0 Cl) Iq LO 0 o ' N T a CO O O C O d O C LL ti 'O0CIO O O C C m A H f- O a)sU d u CL m `m m O (/) a •cu :3 a) — >C_ 0 M y a O N O O N 0) p f6 m� Z N C 70 C U {— m (6 D y L77 O N f0 J m m m Z N m O O Y Y O L L L C w f0 m m m U > ON d m m w d d (n > o LL N a. O a O � Z O m t0 d a � ^ mE O O M AWAi :per ..,,1 � • � - _-- a� "— 'i � � , •e ���� �, A.a�wwe���� - �, ��:III — .+� t ; C L A U LL s O p) N E0 m O T �w� O VJ+_y N N -r— N 7 C- N cc H O` h N tm L C �j 0)CL F°� m � d y� g� ) w c5 E L l0 L U d N cn Cl) LL ami (n 0 o Cc ca C N CC�� O fa Z O N N i� U- M -1402 FE F—�50co Vi Iz N 3 .. " Y 4�... e••eP_ �_. t K 00 ,F x lk 1 CD CD s r � x f ut, { � V A 04• 2 • CL Zi CD � +�'� 114 .., xy� � �'AS'4 / �xi� �"1�.,�`�b�fw q,� � � `� Y 1 ' • • 1 v � 00 0 C6 1 1 • / 1 ,/ 1 LL 1 1 • , Vi Iz N �o N c ow WW CL O �_ VJ a"' ti Y U C_ M 0 O m C E- C a v 4) �O N O N j d c0 a�r_ Erg L O W E O c6 V N N �> m 3 CD'- of Q > c.. ° m ii cD z c n t4>,t • 4' ' 4�3�'�* O�iMK�% �w,/ i C F IM •"J� N Ne .L � ��� � „ ., y;pY f!y }v .�.. :i Aa i( ' r . �Y k/t4 # Y f• ,�jy *' e� Iw 'it �+ 4 r„ ..»/ t A� f � e cli , 14 ZA I � • ir aj1gti i; w,. y A X,� ]f :F,x♦ \y y�a t � t ,... � � �. . • y ,ya , x � M! • CN IIN • y r • • • a � 04 CL Cc • � a I#ca Y ' ♦ sem` • • .ep+ ♦ co tr � � a ,f y • f .r — Cl) • Y CD W �., w 4% O L E •�z L cfn U �� aJ m � o 0 0 0 `o_ d Cl. d M M M 0 a. U t m `m � c td o LL C co wee' R 1�dtia z Q O O N O �n i d j hili O LL J U a� o v � N CL 0 CD L O LL OO Z' n` a m U N � � O O N N c O > E Z LL J O .,...,. ._.: c 7 O .� U LL I- O S N APPENDIX WINTER BEACH 73RD STREET HISTORICAL AERIALS REVIEWED 270 .r - CL d Cd N N co Qi a I r- 0 rn M N L d C� O co Qi a I r- 0 rn M N r N iii m 10 r N r r N 00 N L Q (B L 0) O 4- 0 I..L N O N o� N 6821 SW Archer Road Gainesville, FL 32608 Voice: 352/372-1500 Toll Free: 1/800/242-4927 Fax: 352/378-1500 businessdev@waterandair.com www.waterandair.com Environmental Engineers, Scientists, & Planners 280 AN APPRAISAL OF 36.99± ACRES OF VACANT LAND LOCATED AT 2705-3005 73RD STREET VERO BEACH, FLORIDA 32967 PREPARED FOR MS. WENDY SWINDELL ASSISTANT DIRECTOR PARKS & CONSERVATION INDIAN RIVER COUNTY 1590 9TH STREET SW VERO BEACH, FL 32962 CLIENT REFFERCE NO.: WINTER BEACH 73RD AS OF MAY 1, 2025 :• BOYLE & DRAKE, INC. 80 ROYAL PALM POINTE, SUITE 401 VERO BEACH, FL 32960 772-778-7577 INFO@BOYLEDRAKE.COM BOYLE & DRAKE, INC. FILE # 202503375 PREPARED JULY 21, 2025 281 Stephen M. Boyle, MAI State -Certified General Real Estate Appraiser RZ3470 July 21, 2025 Boyle & Drake, Inc. Real Estate Appraisers and Consultants 80 Royal Palm Pointe, Ste. 401 Vero Beach, FL 32960 Telephone: (772) 778-7577 Info@BoyleDrake.com Ms. Wendy Swindell Assistant Director Parks & Conservation Indian River County Vero Beach, FL 32962 Ms. Swindell: Stephen J. Boyle, MAI State -Certified General Real Estate Appraiser RZ699 In accordance with your request, we have made an investigation and analysis of the above - referenced property. The subject site consists of vacant land located at the east terminus of 73'd Street along the southern side and the west side of the Indian River Lagoon in Indian River County. The address of the property is 2705-3005 73rd Street, Vero Beach, FL 32967. The property is located outside of the City of Vero Beach in unincorporated Indian River County, Florida. The site area consists of 36.99± acres with the upland acreage estimated at 17.4± acres and approximately 19.5± acres of wetlands based upon the provided Environmental Bond Nomination Number 24 via Water & Air Research, Inc. - Dated 2024. The client and intended user of this assignment is the Assistant Director Parks & Conservation Indian River County. The purpose of the appraisal is to estimate the Market Value of the Fee Simple Estate of the subject property. The intended use of the appraisal is to establish the Market Value of the subject property for a potential acquisition by the Client and Intended User. The effective date of value was May 1, 2025. As a result of our investigation and analysis of the information obtained there from, as well as a general knowledge of real estate valuation procedures, it is our opinion the Fee Simple Market Value of the subject property as of May 1, 2025, was: ONE MILLION SIX HUNDRED AND FOURTY THOUSAND DOLLARS ($1,640,000) 282 Boyle & Drake, Inc. Ms. Swindell Assistant Director Parks & Conservation Indian River County July 21, 2025 Page ii Extraordinary Assumptions: 1. An Environmental Impact Report indicates approximately 19.5 acres of the subject property consists of wetland areas. It is an Extraordinary Assumptions of this report that the estimated wetland acreage from the Environmental Bond Nomination Number 24 via Water & Air Research, Inc. - Dated 2024 is accurate. If additional information indicates a different wetland acreage, we reserve the right to review and possibly modify the value opinion developed within this report. 2. Per the Indian River County Zoning Map, the maximum density for the subject per zoning totals 60f Single Family Residential units. In this market it is typical to develop residential subdivision properties below their maximum density due to setback, site improvement requirements and other physical restrictions. As such, we have estimated the planned development density at 39 units given the legal zoning restrictions, the physical restrictions of the site (wetlands) and data from the Sales Comparison Approach. If additional information becomes available indicating a different maximum number of residential units for the subject property, we reserve the right to review and possibly modify the value opinion developed within this report. Hypothetical Condition: None The use of an Extraordinary Assumption or Hypothetical Condition may affect assignment results It is our opinion that the following appraisal report was prepared in accordance with the requirements of the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice (USPAP) as approved by the Appraisal Standards Board of the Appraisal Foundation as they apply to an Appraisal Report. The depth of discussion contained in this report is specific to the needs of the client and for the intended use stated in this report. The appraiser is not responsible for unauthorized use of this report. r,, Boyle & Drake, Inc. Ms. Swindell Assistant Director Parks & Conservation Indian River County July 21, 2025 Page iii A description of the property appraised, together with an explanation of the valuation procedures utilized, is contained in the attached appraisal report. For your convenience, an Executive Summary follows this letter of transmittal which is made part of the attached appraisal report. Should you have any questions regarding this report, please do not hesitate to contact us. Respectfully submitted, BOYLE & DRAKE, INC. , " 4� Stephen M. Boyle, MAI State -Certified General Real Estate Appraiser RZ3470 Expires 11-30-2026 284 Boyle & Drake, Inc. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY PROPERTY TYPE: Vacant Land in unincorporated Indian River County, Florida CLIENT REFERENCE NO.: Winter Beach 73rd CLIENT: Parks & Conservation Indian River County INTENDED USER(S): Parks & Conservation Indian River County INTENDED USE: To estimate the market value of the Fee Simple Estate of the subject property. The intended use is to establish market value for a potential acquisition of the subject property. SUBJECT TAX ID: 32390300000003000001.0 32390200000500000001.0 SUBJECT OWNER: Luther John M (Tr) APPRAISER(S): Stephen M. Boyle, MAI. DATE OF VALUATION: May 1, 2025 DATE OF REPORT: July 21, 2025 INTEREST APPRAISED: Fee Simple Estate LAND SIZE: Approximately 36.99± gross acres, or 1,611,284 square feet with 17.4± acres of uplands and 19.5± Acres of Wetlands. LOCATION/ ACCESS: The subject property is located east of US Highway 1 at the terminus of 73rd Street in Vero Beach, Florida. 1V 285 Boyle & Drake, Inc. ZONING: LAND USE PLAN: FLOOD ZONE/MAP: EASEMENTS: PRESENT USE: SUBJECT ADDRESS: REPORT FORMAT: IMPROVEMENTS DESCRIPTIONS: HIGHEST AND BEST USE: AS IF VACANT: AS IMPROVED: VALUE INDICATIONS: COST APPROACH: SALES COMPARISON: INCOME APPROACH: CONCLUDED FEE SIMPLE MARKET VALUE: RS -1 and RS -3. L-1, Low Density Residential (3 Units per Acre) & C-2, Conservation (1 Unit per 40 acres Zone AE/Map Number 12061 CO231 J. None Known Vacant Land 2705-3005 73rd Street, Vero Beach, Florida 32967 Appraisal Report per 2024 USPAP None - Vacant Based on the information presented in this report, we have conclude that the highest and best use of the subject sites "As Vacant", would be for development of a residential single family subdivision. Not applicable as the subject property is vacant and unimproved. N/A $1,640,000 N/A $1,640,000 v 286 Boyle & Drake, Inc. Extraordinary Assumptions: 1. An Environmental Impact Report indicates approximately 19.5 acres of the subject property consists of wetland areas. It is an Extraordinary Assumptions of this report that the estimated wetland acreage from the Environmental Bond Nomination Number 24 via Water & Air Research, Inc. - Dated 2024 is accurate. If additional information indicates a different wetland acreage, we reserve the right to review and possibly modify the value opinion developed within this report. 2. Per the Indian River County Zoning Map, the maximum density for the subject per zoning totals 60f Single Family Residential units. In this market it is typical to develop residential subdivision properties below their maximum density due to setback, site improvement requirements and other physical restrictions. As such, we have estimated the planned development density at 39 units given the legal zoning restrictions, the physical restrictions of the site (wetlands) and data from the Sales Comparison Approach. If additional information becomes available indicating a different maximum number of residential units for the subject property, we reserve the right to review and possibly modify the value opinion developed within this report. Hypothetical Condition: None The use of an Extraordinary Assumption or Hypothetical Condition may affect assignment results ESTIMATED EXPOSURE TIME: 6 to 12 months Vi 287 Boyle & Drake, Inc. TABLE OF CONTENTS Page No. Letterof Transmittal............................................................................................................. i ExecutiveSummary ............................................................................................................ iv, Tableof Contents............................................................................................................... vii Photographs......................................................................................................................... 1 General Information............................................................................................................ 3 Purpose and Date of the Appraisal Report ............................................................................3 InterestAppraised.................................................................................................................3 AppraisalReport Format.......................................................................................................3 LegalDescription..................................................................................................................4 PropertyHistory....................................................................................................................4 AppraisalDefinitions............................................................................................................6 Scopeof Work..................................................................................................................... 8 MarketArea Analysis........................................................................................................11 MarketArea Demographics................................................................................................12 Current Market Conditions 2025........................................................................................16 PropertyData.......................................................................................................................25 Location...............................................................................................................................25 Access..................................................................................................................................25 SiteSize...............................................................................................................................25 SoilTypes............................................................................................................................28 FloodHazard Zone..............................................................................................................32 RealEstate Taxes............................................................................................................... 34 Highest and Best Use Conclusions.................................................................................... 35 Valuation........................................................................................................................... 38 Prefaceto Value..................................................................................................................38 SalesComparison Approach...............................................................................................39 Estimate of Marketing Time/Exposure Time.................................................................... 57 CertificationStephen M. Boyle......................................................................................... 58 Addenda vii 288 Boyle & Drake, Inc. SUBJECT PHOTOGRAPHS Access From the East Terminus of 73'd Street Western Boundary Line 289 � an Plow I �rt Boyle & Drake, Inc. GENERAL INFORMATION Effective Date of the Appraisal/Date of the Report The value conclusion reached herein is effective as of May 1, 2025. The analysis and report were completed on July 21, 2025. Purpose of the Appraisal Report The purpose of our investigation and analysis was to estimate the Market Value of the Fee Simple Estate of the subject property. Intended Use The function and intended use of this appraisal is to establish the Fee Simple market value for a potential acquisition of the subject property. Client/Intended Use(s) The client and Intended User of this report is the Parks & Conservation Indian River County. Interest Appraised The interest appraised herein is the Fee Simple Estate. Appraisal Report Format The following appraisal report was prepared in conformity with the Uniform Standards of Appraisal Practice (USPAP), 2024 edition Standards Rule 2-2(a). In order to develop the opinion of value, the appraiser considered all valuation procedures to produce a credible opinion of value, as defined by the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice. 291 Boyle & Drake, Inc. Legal Description Parcel No. 1: The North 12 acres of Government Lot 2, Section 2, Township 32 South, Range 39 East; and, Parcel No. 2: The North 16 1/4 acres of Government Lot 3 (said Government Lot 3 being the fractional Northeast quarter of the Southeast quarter), of Section 3, Township 32 South, Range 39 East. Property History The owner of record is Indian River Ranch, LLC. Analysis of the public records of Indian River County indicates there have been no arm's length sales or internal transfers over the last twenty years. The subject property is not currently listed for sale and has not been listed within the last 12 months. Prior Professional Services Stephen M. Boyle, MAI has performed no professional services in the form of an appraisal, as an appraiser, or in any other capacity, regarding the property that is the subject of this report within the three-year period immediately preceding the agreement to perform acceptance of this assignment. Boyle & Drake, Inc. has not provided any other professional services on the subject property over the last three years. Extraordinary Assumptions: An Environmental Impact Report indicates approximately 19.5 acres of the subject property consists of wetland areas. It is an Extraordinary Assumptions of this report that the estimated wetland acreage from the Environmental Bond Nomination Number 24 via Water & Air Research, Inc. - Dated 2024 is accurate. If additional information indicates a different wetland acreage, we reserve the right to review and possibly modify the value opinion developed within this report. 2. Per the Indian River County Zoning Map, the maximum density for the subject per zoning totals 60f Single Family Residential units. In this market it is typical to develop residential subdivision properties below their maximum density due to setback, site improvement requirements and other physical restrictions. As such, we have estimated the planned development density at 39 units given the legal zoning restrictions, the physical restrictions of the site (wetlands) and data from the Sales Comparison Approach. If additional information becomes available indicating a different maximum number of residential units for the subject property, we reserve the right to review and possibly modify the value opinion developed within this report. 4 292 Boyle & Drake, Inc. Hypothetical Condition: None The use of an Extraordinary Assumption or Hypothetical Condition may affect assignment results 293 Boyle & Drake, Inc. APPRAISAL DEFINITIONS The following definitions are pertinent to this report: Market Value "The most probable price that a property should bring in a competitive and open market under all conditions requisite to a fair sale, the buyer and seller each acting prudently and knowledgeably, and assuming the price is not affected by undue stimulus." Implicit in this definition is the consummation of a sale as of a specified date and the passing of title from seller to buyer under the following conditions: (1) Buyer and seller are typically motivated; (2) Both parties are well informed or well advised, and acting in what they consider their own best interests; (3) A reasonable time is allowed for exposure in the open market; (4) Payment is made in terms of cash in U.S. dollars or in terms of financial arrangements comparable thereto; (5) The price represents the normal consideration for the property sold unaffected by special or creative financing or sales concessions granted by anyone associated with the sale." (12 C.F.R. Part 34.42(g); 55 Federal Register 34696, August 24, 1990, as amended at 57 Federal Register 12202, April 9, 1992; 59 Federal Register 29499, June 7, 1994) and Interagency Appraisal and Evaluation Guidelines, Federal Register, Volume 75, No. 237 December 10, 2010. Fee Simple Interest "Absolute ownership unencumbered by any other interest or estate subject only to the limitations imposed by the governmental powers of taxation, eminent domain, police power, and escheat." The Dictionary of Real Estate Appraisal (7th Edition 2022 page 73), by the Appraisal Institute. Leased Fee Interest "An ownership interest held by a lessor, which includes the right to receive the contract rent specified in the lease plus the reversionary right when the lease expires." 294 Boyle & Drake, Inc. The Dictionary of Real Estate Appraisal (7th Edition 2022 page 105), by the Appraisal Institute. 295 Boyle & Drake, Inc. SCOPE OF WORK The purpose of the appraisal is to estimate the market value of the Fee Simple interest of the subject property. The intended use is to establish market value for a possible acquisition of the subject property by the Client and Intended User. Stephen M. Boyle, MAI, inspected the subject property from the exterior roadways and interior trails where accessible on May 1, 2025. Information gathered for this appraisal includes: 1. Site size was based on the Indian River County tax assessor's records. 2. Zoning and land use was based on codes effective as of the date of this report. 3. Flood Zone was based on current FEMA Maps. 4. Wetland and upland size was based on an Environmental Bond Nomination Number 24 via Water & Air Research, Inc. - Dated 2024. A study of the subject neighborhood was conducted with regard to access, land uses, and trends, demographics, and market demand factors for the property type appraised. Once all the data was gathered, the subject property was analyzed with regard to its Highest and Best Use. The three valuation approaches are the Cost Approach, Sales Comparison Approach and Income Approach. The Sales Comparison Approach was the only approach to value necessary to produce a credible appraisal of the subject property as the subject consists of vacant land. As the subject is vacant land without building improvements the Cost Approach was not applicable. The Income Capitalization approach is not applicable since this property is a vacant tract of land and is not income producing. The subject is located outside of the City of Vero Beach and within un -incorporated Indian River County. The subject property consists of two parcels of record with access from the south side of 73rd Avenue. The property size totals 36.99± acres of vacant land with 17.4± acres of uplands and approximately 19.5± acres of wetlands based upon the Environmental Bond Nomination Number 24 via Water & Air Research, Inc. - Dated 2024. The property is currently zoned RS -1 and RS -3, which allows detached residential development ranging in density from 1 to 3 residential units per acre. The land use designations for the subject property is L-1, Low Density Residential (3 Units per Acre) & C-2, Conservation (1 Unit per 40 acres which allows 3 residential units per acre and 1 residential unit per 40 acre). The zoning and land use designation will be further discussed in the property data section of this report. s 296 Boyle & Drake, Inc. All the comparables are vacant tracts of land with zoning and land uses as similar as possible to the subject property. However, there was a lack of sales with identical zoning and land use designations. The applicable data for the approaches utilized in this appraisal report was generated from the above sources, as well as from local real estate brokers, investors (local and regionally), owners, managers, and from an inspection of the neighborhood. All of the market data was confirmed with buyers, sellers, or other real estate professionals who were involved with or had knowledge of the transaction information when possible. It is noted that we attempted to call the parties to the transactions but our calls were not always returned. The scope of the search included a search of MLS records, data published by Indian River County on-line computer service, LoopNet, Crexi, Costar as well as our company database. Additional Scope of Work comments follow throughout the appraisal report. 297 k i; N xsv d M � „.F • .tl;�y r�� S \S jt Boyle & Drake, Inc. ML4RKET AREA ANALYSIS Neighborhood analysis requires identification of boundaries. The boundaries may be defined by complimentary land uses, social factors, economic, or physical boundaries. In the case of this appraisal assignment, neighborhood boundaries are identified by physical boundaries and surrounding land uses. The market boundaries are defined to be as follows: North — Sebastain River South — Indro Road East — Indian River West — I-95 The major focus of the above defined Market Area is the area in and around SR 60 in the City of Vero Beach. This area is about 40% developed. The majority of development in this area has been low density detached single family projects. Interspersed are a small percentage of rental projects and multifamily developments. A large amount of the "vacant" land west of 66'x' Avenue is in citrus groves and other agricultural uses because it is outside the Urban Service Boundary. The Indian River is the area's greatest asset for a recreational facility. The Intracoastal Waterway runs along the Indian River. This is a navigable waterway with inlets to the ocean at Sebastian Inlet approximately 10 miles north and Fort Pierce Inlet approximately 15 miles south. From the subject neighborhood, access to the Barrier Island is by way of the Merrill Barber Bridge (CR 60) and the 17th Street Causeway Bridge. There are a number of parks and recreational areas in the City Limits and the county along the Barrier Island. Major access roads into the Market Area include State Road 60, County Road 510 and 512, Oslo Road, Kings Highway (58' Avenue), 43'd Avenue, 27h Avenue and US Highway 1. The closest Interstate 95 interchange to the subject is approximately 6.5 miles to the west via County Road 510 to Interstate 95. Oslo Road is planned to be the next Interstate 95 interchange road. The additional right-of-way has been purchased with construction of the overpass commencing in mid -2024. Access to the subject Market Area is considered adequate. Access Major access roads into the Market Area include US Highway 1, which is the most proximate to the subject property. Secondary, major market access is provided via State Road 60, Oslo Road, Kings Highway (58h Avenue), 43rd Avenue, and 27th Avenue, and Indian River Boulevard. The closest Interstate 95 interchange is located approximately eight miles to the west from the subject on Sebastian Blvd. Overall, market area access is considered good. The access to the subject property is also considered to be good. 299 Boyle & Drake, Inc. Market Area Demographics The following information was obtained from the CCIM's Site to do Business. On the following page is a ring map of 1, 3 and 5 mile radius. 12 300 Boyle & Drake, Inc. _ .: ', r O �0 MO/MMIMII! A0 AmftW _ y -% fto .. - S ....... - ARM 00— 0.y�� bfi 4 Vol .04Pao" �E�RTfl1. � 13. Boyle & Drake, Inc. Exec Summary nr lrMlrirr ZMS73494VM* ftXh,FWi", 3NO 2 4_ w— to of Nolan 2024 Median uilMalurle - "�1�11r�A1�MiaM�1�A1ilpA!' � . ��Iw JMMIMMJf1117�l1 2 Illy ,yam. diN�gt AMlfllRIMYMM1MiIM�AMi�,�irT.� IM MMr... . R�!!Lf��>�1��•11i111�1wi1111`IhM,r!I!. :; .. pn n�«'�tl,�eq it ftw,w+� awl i�si�aar� LMMIy! MM�MIIAM4N IIK#uy IM1�MM1Mtr,pe10�M .q�41�11I.tc1 u�1MM11, t l�It'lf IjfoMlit 44�+rI�O�r+Nii1►11�Yiale�l.4�.'���aiwi►41�Mi+�i1iFR1f�i+�`eligl�i�rirai;�Fga�rll, ll�rM�'�w�ail!>�f,ts `1� r►��lMldF:oMilwlltMli praMil.;.411nMN1/a. m i waarOr N1iwMil MWIa l� ._ 4 01>ell/tlrNwiW�liM>As tt ANN �94p�iM11 i?: � ?�' tiMl1111�1i1rplr,�iligifiiisi»iillls 3f APKL : 20it�lti�lolWYMuse " � �rM�t� tOa'li Ni6e 37.i7� MM11M �1 i►XIwYiMM�+lw�r�ilir� 2}i,•A1r.�IMMIe'1o0pl�l+li lMr {is.,'IsI�+MM��e�riny �s� lMuwlwrrarwrlrpeol�:7R.17i��rll �iaMt:;IMrI wrM+t�,i761i1rIt�M�frisiheidylM+lalfliyrll'astMil�f�alMk �lrrulleMYedlfiilM�MtR1�111�11�111AMlAl�'�{1It1A/�: NWOfyane.VdA*10ft0"09 a $44X4 wA M4 iwllNls Ynir�RarMM1 �t .IM1�e" �rlC.1111•��IiMMM�,�f+:'M 1��1r�►f�MMk. # Arm �k# iMi IM l�iak:wMN Mflj i4fgpf�l�aR : . wl� slt p�dlad�M!►M1`3'lMrarw�il , •lMwwraSR�s�r!a�l!4Ncal�Mr4IEIlON11111frr> I - 7�tinMa�lYama pi�i�i.'plr�►Ml�lle�������ll��' ++�iiF�s�lrNv�N�M�IeMIa.�►+1i�!MtiM`lMR�1 #rI4IMFsl1. 14. 302. Boyle & Drake, Inc. Market Prof" rutt4�o daofuaMrr 2M5 7W 5c, V00000# $W^ .4M IMM boaft 6-1, ITA "aha me ' LWU*L-. 27_7261.7 aasa� :aAAW -mos t rar +aa+r► -+ o. ams i� 3024-9m AM" raw SAIM Now za4ty 2 AM 4 �wiMr 3�aez1ft= .. 204 ago z «r ., .. .., Ulm uAft WAIO III iq lf-ft. .. "Wow, III "Oft"Owi for 2024 aaw it i5. . 303. Boyle & Drake, Inc. Market Area Demographics We have analyzed data on population, average household size, average household income and buying patterns within the subject's trade area. The Site To Do Business provides the following information within the 3 -mile radius, which is considered the primary trade area for the subject property. In 2024, the trade area's population was 15,520. The population projection for 2029 is 17,386 which shows a growth rate of 2.30%. This indicates minimal growth in the area. Households within the 3 -mile radius of the subject nominally increased from 2024 with 7,562 households to 8,475 households in 2029. Median household income in 2024 was $120,485 which is substantially above the national median income of $79,0968. Overall, the market demographics are favorable indicating minimal population growth with above average household incomes compared to the median for the United States. Current Market Conditions- 2025 Real Estate values were increasing substantially from January 2020 to March 2022. Since mid -2022 price appreciation has slowed, and values have stabilized. Some sections continue to show appreciation while the sectors heavily dependent upon financing have shown slight value declines as a result of the elevated mortgage rates. Marketing times typically run 3 to 6 months when asking prices are near or at market value. Currently, the market is considered to be stable to slightly increasing. 16 304 Boyle & Drake, Inc. Market Area Housine Values The following table summarizes the single-family housing statistics for comparable areas of Indian River County between the years of 2019 to 2025. We have excluded sales from the barrier island as many of the properties have riverfront or ocean views which sell well above the typical mainland home price. From 2019 to 2020 the market remained mostly stable with slow growth. Between late 2020 and early 2022 there were substantial increases in the market. This was due to Covid-19 as remote workers were relocating from larger metropolitan areas to suburban regions. During 2023 appreciation slowed but still steadily continued. Between 2024 to current the market has remained mostly stable with either minimal growth or minimal decline depending upon the neighborhood. Indian River County Single Family Activity Per MLS - Mainland Average Sale Average rear ff or Naies Price L IML gales Hv . rnce Lvivt 2025 748 $451,030 101 - - - 2024 2198 $450,532 89 -3% 5% 7% 2023 2255 $429,166 83 -90/0 6% 73% 2022 2466 $403,354 48 -22% 190/0 -36% 2021 3168 $340,159 75 6% 20% -24% 2020 2987 $284,247 99 5% 7% 43% 2019 2834 $266,240 69 - - - ce: IRC MIS - Statistics include sales in area 21, 31, 41, 42, 51, 52, and 53 for SFR Commercial Uses The majority of the commercial development within the subject neighborhood are located along CR 512, SR 60 and U.S. Highway 1. Commercial uses include small retail strip centers, gas stations, restaurants, single tenant retail users, and a variety of heavy commercial uses including citrus packing plants and light manufacturing facilities. The major shopping facilities are located along US Highway 1 or SR 60. 17 305 Boyle & Drake, Inc. Commercial Uses (Continued) To the north in Sebastian, there is a major shopping center at the intersection of US Highway 1 and Roseland Boulevard (County Road 505). The Riverwalk Shopping Center is anchored by Publix and Walgreens and has a number of smaller retail tenants. Just south of Riverwalk a 100,000 square foot K -Mart was demolished, and a Home Depot was built. South of the Home Depot a Wal-Mart was also built. The Wal-Mart Supercenter occupies 104,300 square feet with additional in-line retail tenants located in free standing strip centers. The Roseland area has been the primary shopping location for the northern subject neighborhood of Sebastian. The southern end of the Market Area is served by the Miracle Mile Shopping District consisting of two Community Shopping Centers and other free-standing retail and strip shopping center. The district is anchored by the grocery stores of Publix and the Fresh Market along with a TJ Maxx and a mix of national and local in-line tenants including Panera Bread and Too Jays Deli. The Miracle Mile district is the primary retail district for the barrier island residents. Due to the barrier island demand, there has been interest in the County Road 510 commercial land extending from US Highway 1 east to the river. Publix Supermarket recently purchased a site and is constructing a new store in this area to coincide with Pulte Homes commencing development on Harbor Isle, after the project was shelved by WCI in 2006. The most recently completed new commercial uses to be developed locally have been mini - storage facilities and single tenant retail uses along SR 60 and US Highway 1. Specifically, Three mini -storage facilities were completed along the US Highway corridor between Vero Beach and Sebastian with an additional facility being completed along eastbound SR 60, just west of US Highway. Vero Beach Airport In 1929, Bud Holman, whose sons and grandsons now operate Sun Aviation, was one of the members of the group that built the Vero Beach airport. The Vero Beach Regional Airport was dedicated in 1930 and in 1932 Eastern Air Lines began refueling there. In 1935 EAL started passenger and mail service from Vero Beach, continuing until around 1972. By the end of the 1930s, the airport was upgraded with runway lights, radio and teletype machines. In 1939, using Public Assistance workers, the runways were extended and a year later the Civil Aviation Administration (CAA) spent $250,000 on more improvements. 18 306 Boyle & Drake, Inc. Vero Beach Airport -Current Currently the Vero Beach Airport is a 1,707 -acre tower -controlled facility with a FAR Part 139 operating certificate. There are three runways 12/30L at 7,314' x 106', 4/22 at 4,974' x 100' and 12/30R at 3,504' x 75'. Multiple FBO's provide fuel and maintenance facilities along with flight training at Paris Air and Skyborne Flight Academy, formerly Flight Safety International. Breeze Airways provides less than daily service to seasonal locations including White Plains, NY, Hartford Connecticut, and Norfolk, Va. Elite Airways was providing passenger service to similar seasonal destinations but suspended service in June 2022. Due to increases in private jet travel among local residents, there has been substantial hangar development on-going over the last 5 years with over 100,000 square feet of space added and additional space in development. Proposed Residential Projects along US Highway 1 in Central Indian River County Within the Central Indian River County Market Area and along the Us Highway 1 corridor near the subject property there are several proposed multi -family and single-family residential projects which have been discussed in the following pages. This information was reported in the Indian River County Community Development Report. Orchid Bay This proposed project is located at 8790 44'h Avenue in Wabasso at the northwestern base of the Wabasso Causeway Bridge and will include 6 duplexes (12 units). The proposed project includes Indian River Lagoon water frontage. Orchid Reserve Townhomes This project is located at 8910 US Highway 1 in S in Sebastian. The location is along the east side of US Highway 1 approximately 0.5 miles north of County Road 510.The project has been proposed for 100 multi -family units. Equiteas Corners PD This proposed project is located at 6480 85'x' Street in Sebastian and has been proposed for 61 residential units, a gas station/convenience store with 20 fueling stations and a car wash. 19 OYA Boyle & Drake, Inc. Bristol Bay This proposed project is located at 4475 Wabasso Road in Sebastian and has been proposed for 499 multi -family units. Liberty Park This proposed project is located at 7000 85' Street in Sebastian and has been proposed for 173 multi -family units. 5920 US Highway 1 This project is located at 5920 US Highway 1 in Vero Beach and has been proposed for a 24 unit multi -family units and 13 single family units. Medstay Multifamily This project is located at 2785 49h Street in Vero Beach and has been proposed for a 15 multi- family rental units for employee and seasonal worker housing. Arbours at Vero Beach PD This project is located at 6250 Highway 1 in Vero Beach and has been proposed for a 84 unit multi -family community. This project has been approved by Planning and Zoning with conditions. Hammock Shores PD This project is located at 3150 69' Street in Vero Beach and has been proposed for a 108 single family lot subdivision. High Point PD This project is located at 4255 65"' Street in Vero Beach and has been proposed for a 170 unit multi -family project. High Point West This conditionally approved project is located at 4525 650' Street in Vero Beach and has been proposed for a 31 unit single-family project. pill 308 Boyle & Drake, Inc. Lost Tree Preserve This approved project is located along the north side of 65' Street and west of Old Dixie Highway in Vero Beach and has been proposed for a 389 single-family lots and 64 single- family attached units. RSG Vero Beach This project is located at 4755 77h Street in Vero Beach and has been proposed for 560 mixed multi -family and single-family units. Spoonbill Preserve PD This project is located at 5550 US Highway 1 in Vero Beach and has been proposed for 460 single-family lots and 412 multi -family units and 17,440 square feet of commercial buildings. Bridge Creek Subdivision This conditionally approved project is located at 4675 651 Street in Vero Beach and has been proposed for a 78 single-family residential lots. Quay Dock Landing This project is located at 2225 63'd Street in Vero Beach and has been conditionally approved for a 60 lot residential subdivision. Planned Residential Projects According to the Indian River County Community Development Department's Activity Report, there is in excess of 3,300± residential units planned for the mainland subject market area under review. All of these projects would be located within a 15 minute drive time to the subject property and would be considered competition in the market if the subject property were to be developed with residential units. 21 309 Boyle & Drake, Inc. Summary of Major Market Area Factors: Market Area Ratings Good Avera a Fair Poor Access ® ❑ ❑ ❑ Appearance ❑ ® ❑ ❑ Protection from Crime ❑ ® ❑ ❑ Availability of Shopping ❑ ® ❑ ❑ Access to Schools ❑ ® ❑ ❑ Employment Opportunities ❑ ❑ ® ❑ Economic Base ❑ ® ❑ ❑ Occupant Skill Levels ❑ ® ❑ ❑ Availability of Commercial Services ® ❑ ❑ ❑ Tax Burden for services provided ❑ ® ❑ ❑ Protection from Detrimental Conditions Marketability Market Area economic considerations are summarized below: Market Area Growth & Value Changes Increasing Stable Declining Population ® ❑ ❑ Property Values ® ® ❑ Rents ® ® ❑ Vacancies ❑ ® ❑ Changes in Property Use Conclusion Market value analysis can best be summarized by referring to neighborhood life cycles. Market areas are perceived to go through four cycles, the first being growth, the second being stability, the third decline, and the fourth revitalization. It is our opinion that increase in interest rates in late 2022 and through 2025 have somewhat "cooled" the residential market. The overall conclusion of marketability for typical properties within the market area is average to good with the only hindrance on growth being the lack of corporate employment and interest rates being at the highest levels in 15+ years. 22 310 Boyle & Drake, Inc. AERIAL We have included the following two aerials to illustrate the overall characteristics of the subject property. Aerial map of the subject per the Indian River County Property Appraiser's Website. The subject is outlined in yellow. 23 311 Boyle & Drake, Inc. WETLAND MAP Mesita FlatwoO E (7.b5V AC.) Citrus (0.054 Ac.) Residential, Mec. Density - 2-5 Dwelling Units/AC (0.018 Ac.) Rural Open(0.0C3 Ac.) Estuarine (0.001 Ac.) Figure 3 The Land Use and Natural Communities on the Winter Beach 73rd St. Property Indian R ver County, Fior-da Lr rwa wa6w& air ME►RCN.INC. Aerial map of the subject per the Environmental Bond Nomination Number 24 via Water & Air Research, Inc. - Dated 2024. The subject is outlined in red. 312 N wa6w& air ME►RCN.INC. Aerial map of the subject per the Environmental Bond Nomination Number 24 via Water & Air Research, Inc. - Dated 2024. The subject is outlined in red. 312 Boyle & Drake, Inc. PROPERTY DATA Location The subject property is located east of US Highway 1 at the terminus of 73rd Street in Vero Beach, Florida. The physical street address of the subject property is 2705-3005 73rd Street, in Vero Beach, Fl 32967. Total land size is 1,611,284± square feet, or 36.99± acres. Access The subject property consists of two parcels of record. Access is currently by way of the east terminus of 73rd` Street. 73rd Street is a two-lane paved roadway that transitions into a dirt roadway. The access point to the property is approximately 0.38± miles from US Highway 1. Overall, access is rated as average for the subject property as to develop the site approximately 0.15± miles of paved road will need to be completed. Site Size The subject property totals approximately 36.99± acres. The Per the Environmental Bond Nomination Number 24 via Water & Air Research, Inc. - Dated 2024 indicates 17.4± acres of uplands and approximately 19.5± acres of wetlands. The subject site's size and shape are summarized below. The data source was personal observation, public records, aerials county tax assessor data and the Environmental Bond Nomination Number 24 via Water & Air Research, Inc. - Dated 2024. Front Feet Along the 39' 1,390± Front Feet Street right-of-way Area/Square Feet 1,611,284± Area/Acres 36.99± Upland Acre 17.4± Wetland Acres 19.5± Shape Irregular Topography -Uplands Former citrus grove and wetlands that are overgrown with native and exotic vegetation. Elevations range from approximately 0 to 7 feet. The subject appears to be level to below road grade. Due to the thick vegetation, it is unknow if any of the former citrus beds remain. 25 313 Boyle & Drake, Inc. Zoning and Land Use Zoning and Future Land Use was based on the Indian River County Zoning Map and Future Land Use Map. The subject is zoned RS -1 and RS -3, Residetial Single Family 1-3 Units per acre by the Indian River County and carries a land use of L-1, Low Density Residential (3 Units per Acre) & C-2, Conservation (1 Unit per 40 acres). RS -3 permit development up to three units per acre and RS -1 permit development up to one unit per acre. An excerpt from the Indian River County Zoning Map with the subject property outlined in yellow follows. The subject property is under Future Land Use Designations; L-1, Low Density Residential (3 Units per Acre) & C-2, Conservation (1 Unit per 40 acres. L-1 permites residential development of up to three units per acre. C-2 permites residential density of one unit per 40 acres. The area of the property determined to be wetlands, by the wetland survey, appears have C-2, Conservation zoning applied to the entire area. An excerpt from the Indian River County Land Use Map with the subject property outlined in red follows: 26 314 Boyle & Drake, Inc. Zoning and Land Use (Continued) rRn r.. 14111 st a v X 73RD PL 3 L f: L?ri L-2r,sst,_; Based upon the above zoning districts and future land use of the subject property indicate a maximum density of 60± units as detailed in the below chart. Note that there are currently no active development approvals on the subject site. Zoning & Density Calculations MaxDensity Zoning Acres Allowed Units RS -3 12.28 3 36 RS -1 24.71 1 24 Totals 36.99 60 Topography/Wetland Areas Based on the Environmental Bond Nomination Number 24 via Water & Air Research, Inc. - Dated 2024 and a review of Public Records, the site includes approximately 19.5± acres of wetlands and approximately 17.4± acres of uplands. 27 315 Boyle & Drake, Inc. Soil Types In general the subject site consists of former bedded citrus land that is overgrown with native and exotic vegetation and wetland areas. The following map and chart indicate the soil types at the subject property as reported by United States Department of Agriculture. 28 316 Noted that the soils map indicates the predominate soil types are Jupiter Fine Sand and Riomar Clay Loam. Jupiter Fine Sand and Pompano Fine Sand are poorly drained sandy soils and not considered prime farm land. Riomar Clay Loam is a poorly drained sandy clay and not considered prime farmland. 29 317 Boyle & Drake, Inc. Utilities Utilities to or near the site include telephone, electricity, water and sewer. Electricity lines are currently located near the subject property. Indian River County Utilities supplies water and sewer service. To develop the site with the maximum density of 60f units, the site would require connection to municipal water and sewer and may require extension and upgrades to the existing lines to service the subject property if developed. F,asements The available Indian River County data and the Environmental Bond Nomination Number 24 via Water & Air Research, Inc. - Dated 2024 do not indicate the presence of adverse easements. Upland Preservation Based on the site visit and aerials, it appears that the subject property includes mostly impacted uplands with heavy growth of exotic vegetation. A site assessment should be undertaken in order to determine any additional upland preservation requirements other than the typical open space requirements and tree mitigation requirements. Environmental Considerations We have not been informed of any environmental issues. We did not observe any obvious environmental issues but we are not qualified to make that determination. It is suggested that our client order a Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessment Report prepared by qualified inspector to determine if there are any environmental issues. We also recommend a wildlife survey to determine if any protected species such as the Scrub Jay, Gopher Tortoise, etc inhabit the subject site. Noted that the Environmental Impact Report did not indicate the presence of any endangered species. Deed Restrictions We have not been advised of the presence of any deed restrictions that may restrict the use of the property. We have not made a title search for deed restrictions nor are we qualified to render a title search. A title search was not provided to us. 30 318 Boyle & Drake, Inc. Abutting Uses Below is a summary of the abutting uses to the subject property. None of the abutting uses are considered to be adverse to the subject property. • North — Residential Development. • South — Residential Development. • East — The Indian River Lagoon • West — Vacant Residential Land. Census Tract The subject is located in Census Tract 508.12 of Indian River County. 31 319 0 250 506 1p0O 1.5]0 2.000 Flood X - Areas determined to be outside 500 year flood plain and is not a designated flood hazard area. Zone X Shaded- Areas of 0.2% annual chance flood hazard, areas of 1% annual chance flood with average depths less than one foot. Flood Zone AE - Special flood hazard areas with base flood elevations. Flood Zone Classification Zone AE Map Panel Number 12061 CO231 J Map Date 1/26/23 The subject parcel is located within Flood Zone AE and flood insurance will be required for improvements constructed on the subject properties encumbered by a mortgage if additional site fill is not added to the property. 32 320 Boyle & Drake, Inc. Conclusion In conclusion, there does not appear to be any obstacles to developing the subject to its highest and best use other than the wetland areas. The subject site, as vacant, is considered to be available for development to its highest and best use which in our opinion is for development of a maximum of approximately 60f single-family residential units as indicated by the Indian River County Zoning Map. The wetlands create obstacles in developing a more intensive development. 33 321 Boyle & Drake, Inc. REAL ESTATE TAXES Tax ID No: 32-39-03-00000-0030-00001/0 Year Assessed Value Millage Rate Ad Valorem Taxes 2024 $348,676 14.0812 $5,494.38 The assessed value totals $ 348,676 Ad valorem real estate taxes total $5,494.38 with no additional non -ad valorem real estate taxes. Tax ID No: 32-39-02-00000-5000-00001/0 Year Assessed Value Millage Rate Ad Valorem Taxes 2024 $30,600 14.0812 $430.88 The assessed value totals $30,600 Ad valorem real estate taxes total $430.88 with no additional non -ad valorem real estate taxes. The subject's current total property tax liability is $5,925.26 per year. Based upon the Appraised value, the subject is under assessed. 34 322 Boyle & Drake, Inc. HIGHEST AND BEST USE The Appraisal Institute, in the 13th Edition of The Appraisal of Real Estate, defines Highest and Best Use as: "The reasonably probable and legal use of vacant land or an improved property, which is physically possible, appropriately supported, financially feasible, and that results in the highest value.' In estimating the Highest and Best Use as though vacant and as improved, there are essentially four stages of analysis: 1. Legally Permissible: What uses are permitted by zoning, private restrictions, building codes, historic district controls and environmental regulations? 2. Physically Possible: What legally permitted uses are physically possible? 3. Financially Feasible: Which of legally permissible and physically possible uses will produce a net return to the owner of the site? 4. Maximally Productive: From the financially feasible uses, the use that produces the highest price or value is the Highest and Best Use. The Highest and Best Use of the land (or site) if vacant and available for use may be different from the Highest and Best Use of the improved property. This is true when the improvement is not an appropriate use, but it makes a contribution to the total property value in excess of the value of the site. 1 The Appraisal Institute, The Appraisal of Real Estate, 13th ed., 277 35 323 Boyle & Drake, Inc. As Vacant Legally Permissible Restrictions imposed by local, state, and federal governments, in addition to various "private" use restrictions determine a site's legal uses. We analyze legal uses with respect to zoning ordinances, deed restrictions, various encumbrances, easements, environmental regulations, and other legally imposed use restrictions. We also examine the ability of the potential use to conform to the existing and anticipated neighborhood development trends and surrounding land uses. The current zoning and land use permits the development of the subject with low density residential uses. The subject's zoning and land use will allow development of up to 60± residential units. Noted that any portion of the subject property that is identified as a jurisdictional wetland connected to the Indian River Lagoon will likely fall under the C-2, Conservation land use and be limited to a density of 1 unit per 40 acres. We are not aware of any legal conditions that would preclude the development of the subject land in a manner consistent with our opinion of the highest and best use. Physically Possible The shape, size and soil conditions of the subject sites uplands lend themselves to agricultural or residential development. Site size and shape are considered adequate for development. The underlying soils of the upland areas of the subject appear capable of supporting residential development assuming no other environmental issues other than the wetland areas. Based on the subject property's site size of 36.99± acres which includes approximately 17.4± acres of uplands and the current zoning district's minimum lot size of 12,000 square feet. We have estimated the subject property's upland area would be able to support approximately 3 units per acre or 39 units in total. Public water and sewer is available. Based on surrounding developments, it is reasonable to conclude that the site is capable of supporting development consistent with our conclusion of highest and best use. Financially Feasible Based on current conditions inclusive of vacant land pricing in the local market, we estimate the current most financially feasible use of the subject is for development of up to 39± Single - Family Residential units as there is strong demand for residential uses. 36 324 Boyle & Drake, Inc. Maximally Productive "Of the financially feasible uses, the highest and best use is the use that produces the highest residual land value consistent with the market's acceptance of risk and with the rate of return warranted by the market for that use given the associated risk. Based on the information we obtained and in the course of this assignment, it is our conclusion that development of up to 39 residential units would be financially feasible and the highest and best use. Conclusion Based on the information presented above, and that data set forth in earlier and later sections of the report, we have conclude that the highest and best use of the subject sites "as vacant", would be for development of a multi -family development with approximately 39 residential units. Most Probable Buyer Our analysis of the subject property and its respective market characteristics indicate the most likely buyer would be a land speculator/developer. 37 325 Boyle & Drake, Inc. VALUATION Preface to Value The process of deriving a value indication for the subject property by comparing sales of similar properties to the property being appraised, identifying appropriate units of comparison, and making adjustments to the sale prices (or unit prices, as appropriate) of the comparable properties based on relevant, market -derived elements of comparison. The sales comparison approach may be used to value improved properties, vacant land or land being considered as though vacant when an adequate supply of comparable sales is available. Source: Appraisal Institute, The Dictionary of Real Estate Appraisal, 7th ed. Page 170 (Chicago: Appraisal Institute, 2022). The Sales Comparison Approach was the only approach to value necessary to produce a credible appraisal as the subject property is vacant land. The Cost Approach was not applicable do to the lack of improvements. The Income Approach was not applicable as the subject property is vacant land and is not income producing. 38 326 Boyle & Drake, Inc. Sales Comparison Approach The Sale Comparison Approach was provided in order to estimate the market value of the vacant land residential land "As Is". Each of the following sales has been analyzed in terms of property rights conveyed, cash equivalency, conditions of sale, time or changes in market conditions, location, topography, property size, zoning/land use and availability of utilities. We researched sales of similar land within the market area (Indian River County) and one sale outside the market area (Brevard County). The typical unit of comparison for residential subdivision development is the price per planned/approved unit. Subdivisions are typically developed below the maximum allowed density with the site plan receiving approval prior to purchase finalization. We have reviewed the legal requirements of the subject's zoning district and data from the Sales Comparison Approach to estimate planned unit density for the subject at 39 units. Min: 15.52 8.93 0.10 75 60 $46,942 $47,068 $16,569 $29,167 2.15 Average: 38.16 32.61 11.10 130.37 94.80 $86,944 $114,217 $25,988 $37,159 3.15 alm 54.73 54.73 26.60 235.38 118.00 $120,530 $175,676 $40,177 $42,373 5.00 Based upon the above summary chart. We have placed most weight on the price per planned unit as it is given the most weight by market participants. The above land sales ranged in price from $29,167 to $41,177 per planned unit with an average of $37,159 per planned unit. A location map, sales write up, ranking analysis, sales chart and a conclusion are shown on the following pages. 39 327 RESIDENTIAL LAND SALES Density Sale Fathve Uplands Wetlands Unita Planned $/Upland Toned Planned Zoned/ Sale Location Date Sale Price Zoning Land Uae Acres Acreage Acreage Zoned Unita $/Acre Acre $/Unit $/Unit Planned 1 6250 US Highway Mar -25 $3,000,000 CG & RM -3 Lrl 24.89 24.89 - 74.67 73 $120,530 $120,530 590,177 $41,096 3.00 Vero Beach, Indian River County 2.93 2 TBD Glenham NE Dr Mar -24 $1,425,000 RS -2 LDR 15.52 8.93 6.59 77.6 - $91,817 $159,574 $18,363 - 5.00 Palm Bay, Brevard County - - 3 3150-3250 69th Street Mar -24 $4,250,000 RS -1 & RS -3 L-1 & C-2 54.73 54.73 - 163 118 $77,654 577,654 $26,026 $36,017 3.00 Vero Beach, Indian River County 2.16 4 2225 Quay Dock Road D-23 $1,750,000 RS -1 & RS -3 Ll & C-2 37.28 37.18 0.10 88 60 $46,942 $47,068 $19,859 $29,167 3.00 Vero Beach, Indian River County - - 5 3050 69th Street Nov -23 $5,000,000 RS -3 L.1 47.71 47.71 - 143.13 118 $104,800 $104,800 $34,933 $42,373 3.00 Vero Beach, Indian River Canty 2.47 6 7650 39th Avenue Mar -22 $3,900,000 RS -3 & RM -3-6 L!2 & C-2 48.80 22.20 26.60 235.38 105 $79,918 $175,676 $16,569 $37,143 4.82 Vero Beach, Indian River County 2.15 Min: 15.52 8.93 0.10 75 60 $46,942 $47,068 $16,569 $29,167 2.15 Average: 38.16 32.61 11.10 130.37 94.80 $86,944 $114,217 $25,988 $37,159 3.15 alm 54.73 54.73 26.60 235.38 118.00 $120,530 $175,676 $40,177 $42,373 5.00 Based upon the above summary chart. We have placed most weight on the price per planned unit as it is given the most weight by market participants. The above land sales ranged in price from $29,167 to $41,177 per planned unit with an average of $37,159 per planned unit. A location map, sales write up, ranking analysis, sales chart and a conclusion are shown on the following pages. 39 327 Boyle & Drake, Inc. Sales Map � r - Comparable Sate 2 TBD Glenham NE Dr c gyp" Palm Bay, FL 32905 s*rtlEi is K 23-74 miles NW Comparable Sale 6 Iver P 7650 39th Avenue Stat Vero Beach, FL 329&T 0.92 miles NW 27W3M.73M S Vara FAV UW Fellsmere „ b Comparable Sale 3 ak 3150-3250 69th Street d - Vero Beach, FL 32967 0.31 miles SW q h s Comparable Sale 5 �h . • tomparabie Sale 4 3050 69th St s ` 2225 Quay Dock Road; Vero Beach, FL 3 Vero Beach, FL 32967;, ,' 0.96 miles SE Comparable Sale 1 6250 US Highway Vero Beach, FL 32967 x* " 40 :328 Boyle & Drake, Inc. Sale No. 1 Property Type: Residentential Vacant Land Deed Date: 03/20/2025 OR Book: 3763 Page: 1725 Legal Description: Please see the deed included in the addenda. Location: 6250 US Highway 1 County: Indian River Parcel ID: 32391000000700000029.0 Access: At the corner of Us Highway 1 And 63'd Street Grantor: Arbours At Woodley Village LLC Grantee: Grbk Gho Homes LLC Zoning: (RM -3), Residential Multi Family (3 Units Per Acre) (C -G) Comercial General Future Land Use: (L-1), Low Density Residential (3 Units Per Acre) Property Rights: Fee Simple Condition of sale: Arm's Length Financing: Cash Equivalent Sales Price: $3,000,000 Days on Market: Off Market Sale Gross Acres: 24.89 Price/Gross Ac $120,530 Upland Acres: 24.89 Wetland Acres: N/A Zoned Units 74 Price/Zoned Unit $40,176 Planned Unit 73 Price/Planned Unit $41,096 Present Use: Vacant Highest & Best Use:Residential Development Intended Use: Residential Development Utilities: County water, Sewer, electric Verification: True Buyer - Steve Lowitz 41 329 Boyle & Drake, Inc. Comments This site is located at the corner of US Highway 1 and 631 Street in Vero Beach, Florida. The site is zoned CG commercial general and RM -3. The zoning district permits commercial and multi -family development up to 3 units per acre. The land use designation is L-2, which also permits 6 units per acre. In our opinion the highest and best use is to develop the entire site with a residential development scheme as opposed to developing a commercial project at the corner of the site. This opinion was based upon the more sparce development between Sebastian and Vero beach along the major throughfare. The buyer, GHO Homes is a local semi -custom home builder who has developed several subdivisions in the area. Currently, the site is planned to be developed with 73 single family homes. Current Sale Information: Previously this property sold in March of 2025 for $3,000,000, or $120,530.33 per square foot of upland area and $1.30 per square foot of gross land area. It is our opinion that the sale was market oriented. Prior Sale Information: Parcel 1 sold in June 2023 for $997,500, or $49,528.30 per acre of gross land area. Parcel 2 previously sold in June 2023 for $262,500, or $55,263.15 per acre of gross land area. Additionally, parcel 2 included a non -arm's length internal transaction which occurred in August of 2024 for $100. There have been no other arm's length sales over the past five years. 42 330 Boyle & Drake, Inc. Sale No. 2 Property Type: Residententiai Vacant Land Deed Date: 03/06/2024 OR Book: 10011 Page: 1345 Legal Description: Please see the deed included in the addenda. Location: TBD Glenham NE Dr County: Brevard Parcel ID: 28-37-23-00-761 Access: Glenham NE Dr Grantor: Ska Properties LLC Grantee: Price Family Homes INC Zoning: (RS -2), Single Family Residential (3 Units Per Acre) Future Land Use: (LDR), Low Density Residential (3 Units Per Acre) Property Rights: Fee Simple Condition of sale: Arm's Length Financing: Mortgage/Sunrise Bank -$926,250 Sales Price: $1,425,000 Days on Market: Off Market Sale Gross Acres: 15.52 Price/Gross Ac $91,817 Upland Acres: 8.93 Wetland Acres: 6.59 Zoned Units 77 Price/Zoned Unit $18,363.40 Planned Unit N/A Price/Planned Unit N/A Present Use: Vacant Highest & Best Use:Residential Development Intended Use: Residential Development Utilities: County water, County sewer, electric Verification: True Buyer - Price Family Homes Sales Office 43 331 Boyle & Drake, Inc. Comments This site is located along on the west side of Glenham NE DR just south of Palm Bay Road in Palm Bay, Florida. The site is zoned RS -2, Single Family residential permitting f5 single family units per acre and has a future land use designation of LDR, Low Density Residential. The buyer, Price Family Homes is a local home builder in the area, offering customizable house plans and specializing in "build on your lot" services. Additionally, Price Family Homes currently has one production community which is known as Hidden Woods. Hidden Woods is a townhome HOA community which offers 3 to 4 unit buildings with minimal to no amenities. Per our conversation with the sales team, the site is in the planning stages and the project is approximately 2-3 years from delivering their first lots to market. Current Sale Information: The property sold in March of 2024 for $1,425,000, or $91,817 per acre of gross land area. It is our opinion that the sale was market oriented. Prior Sale Information: The Property last sold in June 2012 for $152,900, or $9,793.81 per acre of gross land area. There have been no other arm's length sales over the past five years. 4 332 Boyle & Drake, Inc. Sale No. 3 Property Type: Residentential Vacant Land Deed Date: 03/14/2024 OR Book: 3684 Page: 959 Legal Description: Please see the deed included in the addenda. Location: 3150-3250 69th Street & 3205- 3275 73rd Street County: Indian River Parcel ID: 32390300000700000005.0, Multiple Please See Addenda Access: 69' Street and 73' Street Grantor: Marc Vero Beach LLC Grantee: Grbk Gho Homes LLC Zoning: (RS -3), Single Family Residential (3 Units Per Acre) (RS -1) Single Family Residential (1 Unit Per Acre) Future Land Use: (L-1), Low density Residential (3 Units Per Acre) Property Rights: Fee Simple Condition of sale: Arm's Length Financing: Cash Equivalent Sales Price: $4,250,000 Days on Market: Off Market Sale Gross Acres: 54.73 Price/Gross Ac $77,654 Upland Acres: 54.73 Wetland Acres: N/A Zoned Units 163 Price/Zoned Unit $26,025 Planned Unit 118 Price/Planned Unit $36,016 Present Use: Vacant Highest & Best Use: Residential Development Intended Use: Residential Development Utilities: County water, County Sewer, Electric Verification: Listing Broker - Bill Mills 45 333 Boyle & Drake, Inc. Comments This site is located In between 69'h Street and 79th Street in Vero Beach, Florida. The site is mainly zoned RS -3, permitting 3 single-family units per acre with and additional +-0.444 acres being zoned RS -1 Single Family which permits 1 unit per acre. The land use designation is L-1, Low density Residential, permitting 3 units per acre with an additional +-0.44 acres having a future land use designation of (3 Units Per Acre). The buyer, GHO Homes is a local semi -custom home builder who has developed multiple large-scale subdivisions in the area. The project directly abuts a prior GHO community which was completed within the last 5 years. Currently, the site is planned to be developed with 118 single family homes. Current Sale Information: The property sold in March of 2024 for $4,250,000, or $77,653 per acre of gross land area. It is our opinion that the sale was market oriented. Prior Sale Information: There have been no other transactions over the past five years. 46 334 Boyle & Drake, Inc. Sale No. 4 Property Type: Residentential Vacant Land Deed Date: 12/1/2023 OR Book: 3666 Page: 2197 Legal Description: Please see the deed included in the addenda. Location: 2225 Quay Dock RD County: Indian River Parcel ID: 32391100000500000001.0 Access: Quay Dock RD Grantor: H Wayne Klekamp INC Grantee: Rancho Homes LLC Zoning: (RS -3), Residential Single Family (3 Units Per Acre) (RS -1) Single Family Residential (1 Units Per Acre) Future Land Use: (L-1), Low density Residential (3 Units Per Acre) (C-2) C-2 Conservation (1 unit per 40 acres). Property Rights: Fee Simple Condition of sale: Arm's Length Financing: Cash Equivalent Sales Price: $1,750,000 Days on Market: Off Market Sale Gross Acres: 37.28 Price/Gross Ac $46,942 Upland Acres: 37.28 Wetland Acres: 0.1 Zoned Units 88 Price/Zoned Unit $19,859 Planned Unit N/A Price/Planned Unit N/A Present Use: Vacant Highest & Best Use:Residential Development Intended Use: Residential Development Utilities: County Water, County, Sewer, Electric Verification: Buyer Broker - Terry Torres 47 335 Boyle & Drake, Inc. Comments This site is located on the south side of Quay Dock Road and the north side of 63' Street in Vero Beach, Florida. Specifically, Quay Dock Road only has a 10'foot paved Roadway, which is insufficient to develop a subdivision. As such, 63rd street will need to be extended approximately ±0.143 miles. The site is zoned RS -3, permitting 3 single-family units per acre. The land use designation is L-1, low density residential permitting 3 units per acre. There is 0.1 -acre tract of wetland on the opposite side of Quay Dock Road which would likely be abandoned. As such, this minimal area was given minimal consideration. Current Sale Information: The property sold in December of 2023 for $1,750,000, or $46,942 per acre of gross land area. It is our opinion that the sale was market oriented. Prior Sale Information: There have been no other transactions over the past five years. 48 336 Boyle & Drake, Inc. Sale No. 5 Property Type: Residentential Vacant Land Deed Date: 12/1/2023 OR Book: 3666 Page: 692 Legal Description: Please See The Deed Included In The Addenda Location: 3050 69t' Street County: Indian River Parcel ID: 32391000000100000002.0, Multiple Please See Addenda Access: Quay Dock Road and 691 Street Grantor: Winter Beach LLC Grantee: Toll Southeast Lp Company Inc Zoning: (RS -3), Residential Single Family (3 Units Per Acre) Future Land Use: (L-1), Low density Residential (3 Units Per Acre) Property Rights: Fee Simple Condition of sale: Arm's Length Financing: Cash Equivalent Sales Price: $5,000,000 Days on Market: Off Market Sale Gross Acres: 47.71 Price/Gross Ac $104,799 Upland Acres: 47.71 Wetland Acres: N/A Zoned Units 143 Price/Zoned Unit $34,933.27 Planned Unit 118 Price/Planned Unit $42,372.88 Present Use: Vacant Highest & Best Use:Residential Development Intended Use: Residential Development Utilities: County Water, County Sewer, Electric Verification: True Buyer — Toll Brothers Sales Office 49 337 Boyle & Drake, Inc. Comments This site is located on the south side of 691 Street just east of 331 Avenue in Vero Beach, Florida. The site is zoned RS -3, permitting 3 single-family units per acre. The land use designation is L-1, Low Density Residential permitting 3 units per acre. The property was purchased by Toll Brothers, a national home builder specializing in single family semi customizable homes. The site is currently being developed as a single-family subdivision. The community is named Crossbridge by Toll Brothers and will encompass 118 single family home sites with improvements that will range from 1,885 to 2,614 square feet. The homes will included 2 to 4 bedrooms, 2 to 3 bathrooms, and pool options are available. Current Sale Information: The property sold in November of 2023 for $5,000,000, or $104,799 per acre of gross land area. It is our opinion that the sale was market oriented. Prior Sale Information: There have been no other transactions over the past five years. 50 338 Boyle & Drake, Inc. Sale No. 6 Property Type: Residentential Vacant Land Deed Date: 03/11/2022 OR Book: 33520 Page: 2135 Legal Description: Please see the deed included in the addenda. Location: 7650 39TH Avenue County: Indian River Parcel ID: 32390300000300000001. 1, Multiple Please See Addenda Access: Quay Dock Road and 69t' Street Grantor: AC Vero Beach LLC Grantee: Burrell Diversified Investments LLC Zoning: (RS -3), Residential Single Family (3 Units Per Acre) (RM -3 Residential Multi Family (3 Units Per Acre) (RM-6),Residential Multi Family( 6 Units per Acre) Future Land Use: (L-2), Low density Residential (3 Units Per Acre) (C2) Conservation -2 (1 unit per 40 acres) Property Rights: Fee Simple Condition of sale: Arm's Length Financing: Cash Equivalent Sales Price: $3,900,000 Days on Market: Unkown Gross Acres: 48.8 Price/Gross Ac $79,918 Upland Acres: 22.20 Wetland Acres: 26.60 Zoned Units 235 Price/Zoned Unit $16,568.95 Planned Unit 105 Price/Planned Unit $37,142.85 Present Use: Vacant Highest & Best Use:Residential Development Intended Use: Residential Development Utilities: County Water, County Sewer, Electric Verification: Internal Records 51 RRM Boyle & Drake, Inc. Comments This sale includes 48.80 gross acres planned for 105 townhome units. The site has frontage along the Indian River Lagoon, but the upland development portion is located on the western end of the site. The eastern side of the site has wetlands. Based on internal records, this property was determined to have approximately 22.20 acres are uplands and 26.60 acres are wetlands. At the time of sale, the property had preliminary site plan for 105 townhome units or 2.15 units per acre. The site has a split zoning of RM -6, RM -3 and RS -3 and land use with the mangrove wetland fronting the Indian River areas having a land use of Conservation (1 unit per 40 acres). The upland area has a future land use of Low Density residential, allowing up to 6 units per acre. The sale occurred in March of 2022 for $3,900,000, or $79,918 per gross acre or $175,676 per net acre and $37,143 per planned unit. Most recently, the property sold to the Indian River Land Trust for $4,300,000 in March of 2024. The sale price was based upon an Appraisal and not development motivated. As such we have utilized the prior sale in the valuation. Current Sale Information: The property sold in March of 2024 for $4,300,000, or $88,114.75 per acre of gross land area. It is our opinion that the sale was market oriented. Prior Sale Information: In October of 2023 there was an internal transfer. The property was sold for $3,900,000 in March of 2022. There have been no other transactions sales over the past five years. 52 340 Boyle & Drake, Inc. Rating Criterion According to the 13' Edition of The Appraisal of Real Estate, there is Qualitative and Quantitative analysis for comparing sales to the subject property. Qualitative analysis recognizes the inefficiencies of real estate markets and the difficulty in expressing adjustments with mathematical precession. We were unable to establish Quantitative adjustments for the comparable sales with regards to location, quality, size, economic considerations, etc. Therefore, we have utilized a Qualitative analysis in this valuation. Qualitative rating for basic features such as location, quality, size, economic considerations, etc. are based on a relatively straight forward ranking analysis of equal to, superior to, or inferior to the subject property. The sum total of the rankings are computed to be overall similar to, superior to, or inferior to the subject and thus are ranked based on these criteria. From this basis, the subjective sales price of the subject property can be estimated by this approach. This process provides for a logical means of estimating the value of the subject by bracketing the values based on overall ratings. Property Rights The valuation of the subject property in this section of the report is that of Fee Simple Estate. All sales were Fee Simple. As a result, no adjustment was required. Financing (Cash Equivalency) Implied in the Market Value definition is that the purchase price of the property is paid in cash or terms equivalent to cash. Based upon our analysis of improved sales, we conclude that all sales were cash equivalent. Condition of Sale All the sales were considered arm's length transactions, and no adjustment was required. Current Market Conditions- 2025 Real Estate values were increasing substantially from January 2020 to March 2022. Since mid -2022 price appreciation has slowed, and values have been increasing at a more moderate level. Some sections continue to show appreciation while the sectors heavily dependent upon financing have shown slight value declines as a result of the elevated mortgage rates. Marketing times typically run 3 to 6 months when asking prices are near or at market value. Overall, the market is considered to be stable for residential and commercial properties within the market area. 53 341 Boyle & Drake, Inc. Location The excluding comparable sale 2 all the comparable sales were located within Indian River County. Comparables 1, 2, 3, 5, and 6 were located along thoroughfares and were considered similar. Comparable Sale 4 was considered to have a highly inferior location as development will require substantial roadway improvements. Topography The subject property has substantial wetlands which were considered an adverse characteristic. Overall, given the subject property's site size, shape and topography, we have considered the comparable sales 2, and 6 similar. Comparable sales 1, 3, 4, and 5 were considered superior given their lack of wetlands and adverse site conditions. Shape/Size The subject property totaled ±36.99 acres in size with ±17.4 acres of uplands. The comparable sales were considered to have similar shapes. We have reviewed the comparable sales acreage and we have ranked accordingly. Zoning/Land Use The subject property has a zoning district of Residetial Single Family 1-3 Units per acre. This district allows an assortment of less intense residential uses. Comparable sales, 2 and 6 were considered to be superior. The remaining comparables have similar zoning districts of 1 to 3 units per acre and were considered similar. Utilities/Other The subject property and the comparable sales all have similar access to County Water, County Sewer, and Electric. As such, we have rated the comparables as similar. 54 342 Boyle & Drake, Inc. LAND SALES ADJUSTMENTAIANKING GRID Sale 2 Sale 3 Sale 4 Sale 5 Sale 6 Subject Sale 1 Address 2705-3005 6250 US TBD Benham 3150 -325069th 2225 Quay Dock 3050 69th Street 7650 39th 73rd Street Highway NEDr Street Road Avenue City Vero Beach Vero Beach PahnBay Vero Beach Vero Beach Vero Beach Vero Beach County Indian River Indian River Brevard Indian River Indian River Indian River Indian River Sale Date Mar -25 Mar -24 Mar -24 Dec -23 Nov -23 Mar -22 Sale Price $3,000,000 $1,425,000 $4,250,000 $1,750,000 $5,000,000 $3,900,000 Adjustment $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Eff. Sale Price - $3,000,000 $1,425,000 $4,250,000 $1,750,000 $5,000,000 $3,900,000 Max Zoned Density 60 84 78 163 88 143 235 Planned Develop. 32 73 - 118 60 118 105 MaxDen/Planned 53% 87% 72% 68% 82% 45% Topography Level Level Level Level Level Level Level Shape Irregular Irregular Rectangular Irregular Irregular Irregular Irregular Acres 36.99 24.89 15.52 54.73 37.28 47.71 48.80 Uplands 8.8 24.89 8.93 54.73 37.18 47.71 22.20 Zoning RS -1 & RS -3 CG& RM -3 RS -2 RS -1 & RS -3 RS -1 & RS -3 RS -3 RS -3 & RM -3-6 Price Per Goss Acre $120,530 $91,817 $77,654 $46,942 $104,800 $79,918 Price Per Upland Acre $120,530 $159,574 $77,654 $47,068 $104,800 $175,676 Price Per Zoned Unit $35,714 $18,363 $26,026 $199859 $34,933 $16,569 Price Per Planned Unit $41,096 $36,017 $299167 $42,373 $37,143 Property Rights Conveyed Fee Simple Fee Simple Fee Simple Fee Simple Fee Simple Fee Simple Financing Tema Typ. ofMarket Typ. ofMarket Typ. ofMarket Typ. of Market Typ. ofMarket Typ. ofMarket Condition of Sale Arms Length Arm's Length Arms Length Ands Length Arms Length Arms Length Condition of Sale Adjustment 0.000/0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.000/0 0.000/0 Price Per Goss Acre $120,530 $91817 $77,654 $46,942 $104,800 $79,918 Price Per Upland Acre $120,530 $159,574 $779654 $47,068 $104,800 $175,676 Price Per Zoned Unit $35,714 $18,363 $26,026 $19,859 $34,933 $16,569 Price Per Planned Unit $41,096 $36,017 $29167 $42,373 $37143 Location Similar Similar Similar Inferior Similar Similar Topography Superior Similar Supeiror Superior Superior Similar Shape/Size Similar Superior Inferior Similar Inferior Inferior Zoning/Land Use Similar Superior Similar Similar Similar Superior Utilities/Other Similar I Similar I Similar I Inferior I Similar I Similar Overall Atiustment Superior I Superior I Similar I Inferior I Similar I Similar 55 343 Boyle & Drake, Inc. Sales Comparison Approach/Conclusion The sales ranged on a price per planned unit between $29,167 to $42,373 with an average of $37,159 per planned unit. Below is a summary of the adjustment/ranking analysis. We have placed most weight on Comparable Sales 3, 5, and 6 as they were most similar to the subject. Secondary weight was placed on Comparable Sales 4 and 1. Comparable Sale 2 was excluded as the developer confirmed there is currently no planned units. It is our opinion, a Market Value for the subject property would fall around $42,000 per planned unit or $1,640,000. OPINION OF MARKET VALUE Planned Unit x Unit Value = Market Value 39 x $42,000 = $1,638,000 Rounded $1,640,000 Extraordinary Assumption: The value opinion is based upon the following Extraordinary Assumptions: Extraordinary Assumptions: An Environmental Impact Report indicates approximately 19.5 acres of the subject property consists of wetland areas. It is an Extraordinary Assumptions of this report that the estimated wetland acreage from the Environmental Bond Nomination Number 24 via Water & Air Research, Inc. - Dated 2024 is accurate. If additional information indicates a different wetland acreage, we reserve the right to review and possibly modify the value opinion developed within this report. 2. Per the Indian River County Zoning Map, the maximum density for the subject per zoning totals 60f Single Family Residential units. In this market it is typical to develop residential subdivision properties below their maximum density due to setback, site improvement requirements and other physical restrictions. As such, we have estimated the planned development density at 39 units given the legal zoning restrictions, the 56 344 Ranking Chart Sale # $/Planned Ranking Sale 1 $41,096 Superior Sale 2 - Superior Sale 5 $42,373 Similar Sale 3 $36,017 Similar Sale 6 $37,143 Similar Sale 4 $29,167 Inferior We have placed most weight on Comparable Sales 3, 5, and 6 as they were most similar to the subject. Secondary weight was placed on Comparable Sales 4 and 1. Comparable Sale 2 was excluded as the developer confirmed there is currently no planned units. It is our opinion, a Market Value for the subject property would fall around $42,000 per planned unit or $1,640,000. OPINION OF MARKET VALUE Planned Unit x Unit Value = Market Value 39 x $42,000 = $1,638,000 Rounded $1,640,000 Extraordinary Assumption: The value opinion is based upon the following Extraordinary Assumptions: Extraordinary Assumptions: An Environmental Impact Report indicates approximately 19.5 acres of the subject property consists of wetland areas. It is an Extraordinary Assumptions of this report that the estimated wetland acreage from the Environmental Bond Nomination Number 24 via Water & Air Research, Inc. - Dated 2024 is accurate. If additional information indicates a different wetland acreage, we reserve the right to review and possibly modify the value opinion developed within this report. 2. Per the Indian River County Zoning Map, the maximum density for the subject per zoning totals 60f Single Family Residential units. In this market it is typical to develop residential subdivision properties below their maximum density due to setback, site improvement requirements and other physical restrictions. As such, we have estimated the planned development density at 39 units given the legal zoning restrictions, the 56 344 Boyle & Drake, Inc. physical restrictions of the site (wetlands) and data from the Sales Comparison Approach. If additional information becomes available indicating a different maximum number of residential units for the subject property, we reserve the right to review and possibly modify the value opinion developed within this report. Hypothetical Condition: None The use of an Extraordinary Assumption or Hypothetical Condition may affect assignment results Estimate of Marketing Time/Exposure Time In order to estimate exposure and marketing time we have considered the following: Criteria for Subject Owner/User Investor Other Who is the typical buyer Is financing available? Yes No With Limitations Supply & Demand Undersupply Equilibrium Oversupply Broker/Investor Outlook Good Average Poor Typical Exposure Time < 12 Months 12 to 18 > 18 Months The overall marketability of the subject property is rated as average. The subject property would most likely appeal to an owner/user or an investor/developer. Based upon the marketing history of the sales analyzed in this report and within our files, we estimate the marketing time and exposure time for the subject property at approximately within 6 to 12 months. 57 345 Boyle & Drake, Inc. CERTIFICATION STEPHEN M. BOYLE, MAI I certify that, to the best of my knowledge and belief: 1. The statements of fact contained in this report are true and correct. 2. The reported analyses, opinions, and conclusions are limited only by the reported assumptions and limiting conditions, and are my personal, impartial, and unbiased professional analyses, opinions, conclusions and recommendations. 3. I have no present or prospective interest in the property that is the subject of this report; and I have no personal interest with respect to the parties involved. 4. I have no bias with respect to the property that is the subject of this report or to the parties involved with this assignment. 5. My engagement in this assignment was not contingent upon developing or reporting predetermined results. 6. My compensation for completing this assignment is not contingent upon the development or reporting of a predetermined value or direction in value that favors the cause of the client, the amount of the value opinion (estimate), the attainment of a stipulated result, or the occurrence of a subsequent event directly related to the intended use of this appraisal. 7. Stephen M. Boyle, MAI made a personal inspection of the subject property. No other person(s) other than the co-signers provided significant real property appraisal assistance in the preparation of this report. 8. The reported analyses, opinions, and conclusion were developed, and this report has been prepared, in conformity with the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice (USPAP) adopted by the Appraisal Standards Board of the Appraisal Foundation. 9. The reported analyses, opinions, and conclusion were developed, and this report has been prepared, in conformity with the Code of Professional Ethics and the Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice of the Appraisal Institute. 10. The use of this report is subject to the requirements of the State of Florida relating to review by the Department of Professional Regulation, Real Estate Appraisal Board. 11. The use of this report is subject to the requirements of the Appraisal Institute relating to review by its duly authorized representatives. 5s 346 Boyle & Drake, Inc. 12. As of the date of this report, I have completed the requirements of the continuing education program of the State of Florida. 13. As of the date of this report, I have completed the continuing education program of the Appraisal Institute. 14. Boyle & Drake, Inc. or Stephen M. Boyle, MAI has not performed professional services in the form of an appraisal, as an appraiser, or in any other capacity, regarding the property that is the subject of this report within the three-year period immediately preceding the agreement to perform acceptance of this assignment. Boyle & Drake, Inc. or Stephen M. Boyle, MAI, have not provided any other professional services on the subject property over the last three years. 15. Devon Conde, Certified Residential Appraiser RD 8464 under the direct supervision of Stephen M. Boyle, MAI, State -Certified General Real Estate Appraiser RZ 3470, provided significant professional assistance to the person signing this report. Mr. Conde's assistance included research, analysis, and report writing. Mr. Conde recorded approximately 25 hours in the preparation of the appraisal report. Stephen M. Boyle, MAI State -Certified General Real Estate Appraiser RZ3470 Expires 11-30-2026 59 347 Boyle & Drake, Inc. ASSUMPTIONS AND LIMITING CONDITIONS: This appraisal report has been made with the following general assumptions: 1. No responsibility is assumed for the legal description or for matters including legal or title consideration. Title to the property is assumed to be good and marketable unless otherwise stated. This report contains a section entitled "Ownership and Sales History" which describes the recent title history of the subject property. This should not be construed to be a title search or a report of title. We render no opinion as to title, which is assumed to be good and marketable. 2. The property is appraised free and clear of any and all leans or encumbrances unless otherwise stated. 3. Responsible ownership and competent property management are assumed. 4. The information furnished by others is believed to be reliable. However, no warrant is given for its accuracy. Site plans, sketches, drawings, and other exhibits in this report are included only to assist the reader in visualizing the property. We assume no liability for their accuracy. 5. The information obtained from engineers, public records, files, Realtors, buyers and sellers, et cetera, was utilized in the preparation of this appraisal report. The information obtained from these sources was assumed to be accurate and correct. We have made a reasonable effort to verify all information presented; however, no responsibility for the accuracy is assumed. 6. It is assumed that there are no hidden or un -apparent conditions of the property, subsoil, or structural that renders it more or less valuable. No responsibility is assumed for such conditions or for arranging for engineering studies that may be required to discover that. This appraisal will not take into consideration the possibility of the existence of any type of hazardous materials which would include, but are not limited by asbestos, PCB's, petroleum leakage, or agricultural chemicals, or other toxic, hazardous, or contaminant substances which may or may not be present on the property or other environmental conditions which were not called to the attention of the appraiser, nor did not appraiser become aware of such during the appraisal inspection. The appraiser has no knowledge of the existence of such materials and/or in the property unless otherwise stated. The appraiser is not qualified to test for such substances or conditions. If the presence of such substances is determined to exist, the appraiser reserves the right to determine the effect on value once appropriate information has been provided by qualified experts. No responsibility is assumed for any such conditions as of the appraisal date. 60 348 Boyle & Drake, Inc. 7. It is an assumption that there is full compliance with all applicable federal, state, and local environmental regulations and laws unless noncompliance is stated, defined, and considered in the appraisal report. 8. It is assumed that all applicable zoning and land use regulations and restrictions have been complied with, unless a nonconformity has been stated, defined, and considered in the appraisal report. 9. The distribution of the total value in the report between land and improvement applies only under the existing program of utilization. The separate valuation for land and building must not be used in conjunction with any other appraisal and are invalid if so used. 10. It is assumed that all required licenses, certificates of occupancy (CO's), permits, consents from any local, state, or national government or private entity have been or can be obtained or renewed for any use on which the value estimate contained in this report is based. 11. It is assumed that the utilization of the land and improvements is within the boundaries of the property lines for the subject and that there are no encroachments unless noted accordingly. 12. The value distribution between land and improvements applies only under the stated use. The separate allocation for land and building must not be used in conjunction with any other appraisal and would be considered invalid if used. 13. The possession of this report, any part thereof, or a copy, does not carry with it the right of publication. The report, a portion, or a copy may not be used for any purpose by any person other than the party to who it is addressed without the expressed written consent of the appraiser. In addition, unless the report contains an original signature, not a copy, the report should be considered invalid. 14. Neither all nor any part of the contents of this report (especially any conclusions as to value, the identity of the appraiser, or the firm with which the appraiser is connected) shall be disseminated to the public through advertising, public relations, news sales, or other media without prior written consent and approval of the appraiser. 15. The preparation of this report does not require testimony in court, unless mutually satisfactory arrangements are made in advance. 16. The Americans With Disabilities Act (ADA) became effective January 1992. The appraiser has not made a special compliance survey of this property to determine 61 349 Boyle & Drake, Inc. whether or not it is in conformity with the various details required. It is possible that a compliance survey of the property, by a qualified individual could reveal that the property is not in compliance with the requirements of the act. The property is assumed to be in compliance and the appraiser reserves the right to modify the value in the event that there are findings to the contrary. Additionally, the value conclusion may not be applicable. 17. A survey was not provided to the appraiser for this assignment. The appraiser reserves the right to modify this report if a survey reflects anything that would significantly affect the value conclusion presented herein. 18. Any proposed improvements are assumed to be completed in a good workmanlike manner in accordance with the submitted plans and specifications. 19. Any sketch in this report may show approximately dimensions and is included to assist the reader in visualizing the property. Maps and exhibits found in this report are provided for reader reference purposes only. No guarantee as to accuracy is expressed or implied unless otherwise stated in this report. No survey has been made for the purpose of this report. 62 350 Boyle & Drake, Inc. ADDENDA 1 351 Boyle & Drake, Inc. PROPERTY DATA 352 Boyle & Drake, Inc. 42237 R RES 1020,2015 OWNERIO'. LUTHER JOHN M iTR, Tm."'w' :i _. • -. # �R 101445 FO BOX 37. '42237'' 111M616 �y NT LOT 3. -WO LOT BEING THE � ERO BEACH FL 32 1 VE = 564.865 Ei166f Y{.1E55N30 fT ACRES. 21.9806 *ovum z O A R VAL METHOD: Goat VIlgx9MRY LAB . 0 P_I't E6Adw DAuot A(.p>ml. J- OaOe VNleE. 0592.'Vb 1013- Iq PsaC munenC nalllGdT22; 353 Boyle & Drake, Inc. Plip!ll1Y ... R cow "m N 12 AC OF SW 114 (DOVERMENT LOT 2), ORK 37 PP 172 02310200000600000001.0 qN+ 2705 73RD ST VERO BEACH, R. 32967 A10:LUTHER JOHN N' _R.i .. .TAX ARFA;i UTILITIES LAST APPR, TOPOGRAGPHY LAST APPR. YR no? ROAD ACCESS LAST INSP. DATE 031182021 ZONING RS -1 NEXTtNSP.DATE PRIMARY USE 9800 0OF IMPRV NEXT REASON REMARKS - 6 POBOX370 •42226' swe" V8W11117S ISSUE DT PERMIT TYPE PERMIT AREA ST PERMIT VAL 4 H, FLK -W1 SALE DT PRICE GRANTOR DEED NFO 0 7,0 1 "A 'LUTHER'N:LLAXI IO WD; 170E: 16W TOTAL MARJWTVALUE _ �cmrz ACRES'. 120000 fi4ALUE _ U APPR VAL Mmm- Cos jpS9. y_ O DBA: /Itl1..yf 4lP .. s'MAO . . y0w.�° ' . ' . ... gyp•, :.^�^^ ' . i... . � ........ ; 'i�.w � - .' H N ERerArA O.le AlAppwl:Js11RT miklglWIO 064dR26 Vg11- by PffCA - 1XA1NP4Y98 4 354 UTILITIES LAST APPR, TOPOGRAGPHY LAST APPR. YR no? ROAD ACCESS LAST INSP. DATE 031182021 ZONING RS -1 NEXTtNSP.DATE PRIMARY USE 9800 0OF IMPRV NEXT REASON REMARKS - - .. _ . .. - . . :•:e swe" V8W11117S ISSUE DT PERMIT TYPE PERMIT AREA ST PERMIT VAL SIM. 091FOIMIA110M SALE DT PRICE GRANTOR DEED NFO 0 7,0 1 "A 'LUTHER'N:LLAXI IO WD; 170E: 16W �cmrz �..e ears x.�c awasu o:ues a +umx �vx� .vu�isa�w¢��ux�m6�i vti ca rvc w.r r.r wir I AM AM '#I - H N ERerArA O.le AlAppwl:Js11RT miklglWIO 064dR26 Vg11- by PffCA - 1XA1NP4Y98 4 354 Boyle & Drake, Inc. Ham' -RUST POwmS TtiE TRUMUB S MEIN, sHALL HAVE FULL POWER TO HOLD, MANAOS 7IMPROP MW. TO SEU AM C(lWEY AT PUMUC OR PRIVATE SALE, TO. 5XCHANOe, LEASE, PLEDOE, OR MORTGAGE Tim PROPERTY ON TSRMS AND MONS AT rfR SOL$ MSCRSTION OF THE TRU' M%, TO SORROW MONEY, R�STEt OR VATH= SSCURITY; AND TD EKECUM ALL UMMS, ASSIGN'NUW Y� b= OTHER PNS U M T NECESSARY OR PROPP.R FOR PURPOM TRI7SIEBS'RTtii RP.SPECf TOTM f3UAJEG'["TRU$T" j{ .wr im cbUGATBD TO CATION OR,, , t�iCl�f Cl�i�l OR LINNAt a ED Ewe, ORS OR ASSIC7til � 1 UNDER n PARTY. ���Asi.E.Tlluc. M It ►tib UNDE F r ..'OF Or AXt rATfl€n�r�m. UnTREST ACQVIRILD PROVISIONS OF ANY Bayle & Drake, Inc. COMPARABLE PROPERTY CARDS 357 Boyle & Drake, Inc. IIERTY, 43785 R 1l�. lwtl ug T. ... T � _+ Ls3W D—dllMn 415057 SYt1MMtteiGWTLEPL •43785' lSiAtO SEG 10 TWP 32 RNG 39 BEING THE W 5 Ar OFTHE N 10 AC PORT ST LUPE, Fl 34985 UE s 051,010 THE 5EOTR0FSEOTRANOTHESt5AC0FTHEN25 ACRES: 201400 AG*W* AC OF THE SE OTR OF THESE OTR ANDALL OF THE SW OTR OF THE SE OTR LYING E OF THE E ROW OF US t APPR VAL METHOD: COIL, 0 ommmur RT LOSS r 0 3239too0em!1`0090029.0 DBA: SOH %: 110 - AlbIBED VALUE 551,010 6N8 6250 US HIGHWAY 1 VERO BEACH, FL 32957 NSOH 54 X: 100.00 EXEMPTION VALUE NEON 6S X'. 1C0.00 TAXABLE VALVE s 551.016 8 358 Bayle & Drake, Inc. PFOPERTY 43,b: R RES 101200015 OWNER DI: GRSN GHO HOMES LLC TAX AREA. 7 IMPROVEMENT VALUE 0 LpN Demi Iptbn 415w? 590 NW MERCANTILE PL '43786' LAND MARKET 302.813 SEC 10 TWP 32 RNG 39 BE'Nr_ THEE 5 AC OF THEN 10 AC TOTAL MARKET VALUE OF THE SE OTR OF THE SE OTR LESS ROW PORT ST LUCIE. FL 349em 302,813 ACRES: 41808 AG VALUE = 0 ERxtlm-MAApr Andy D+ftm" wm"m 9 359 Boyle & Drake, Inc. .. A R. T76}iN.F OF THE E HALF C�?.71i' MMiMll�iE.tM�'iEC 3 LESS ROW PORT STUNT LUGIE. FL 31966 333903WWO79099 D&k ftn­ 21!:.:+3RDW 5JFRaBEAGEA3M TAX ARM i '42302' ACRES: SAN . APPA VAL YETHOC' C.%. SOH ^:. OW NUN 54 1010 �+d i emexr o.r craw...i. i.W.r o.w Pae-:1i11i1�W' M1�wCeMW,a w�o+73oz 11 361 Boyle & Drake, Inc. Pegeti✓ I EReHVl Deb RfApp.eY-Jewery DbN PAgW. 05AYA'i523 ]lYt3tFY >MR 12 rretian: 362 M —1 R, RES 10.2012015 OVNER0: GRSKGHOHOMESLLC TA%AREW T IMPROVEMENT VALUE 0 1 0 9 39FJIG 39 BEING THE E 10 AC OF THE NW OTR WROF SEC 3 �� ROW 398012 500 HW MERCANTILE PL PORT FAINT LURE, FL 31&38. '4 7' ACRES: *.TTM LAND MARKET TOTAL MARKET VALUE = AG VALUE 581.315 581.315 0 APPR VAL METHOD: Cost PRODUCTNRV LOSS _ 0 MIOMMA DBA'. 80N%: 0.00 ASSESSED VALUE 551,315 Pegeti✓ I EReHVl Deb RfApp.eY-Jewery DbN PAgW. 05AYA'i523 ]lYt3tFY >MR 12 rretian: 362 w�rr � ' [Yp� twsee �� ,rieai�+oreoMsota � . e' � M7MNQ79Y9YaiAt8flW7E _ ('42238' LAND a lli6�l FULLY�90N Q�At7 q OIiA TNRVNNFORAOA PORT SLANT LUCIE,� GARIfETVALIIE = 336.7" . I..11 A M�fi�`Ii�RiiliNFORADfSOF83 ,ACRES. 5.6600 A0VAU7E d iIANI AOM OF 330 YARDS TH RUN 6 APPR. VAL METHOD'. Cad, p .LOSS o 0 Dak-.. Sm %: a* MlommVlRUE = 336.770 m11� 7 7 BFACN.FL» .. 7WM7M%z B ': E70:MPTiDN VALUE I 1 EIMLm-pvYtd 1W -VAMea - MPOLommeiE -D.- 13 363 Boyle & Drake, Inc. PROPERTY 42M .. H-. :I" 02CM L"W De.Crptbll SEC 3TWP 32 RNG 39 MORE FALL►, j'F OF THE SE CCR OF 'NE 6W O7R 8EC 3 TH RUN N FOR A OIS OF 1328.0 low ADIS OF 327.8 FT TH RUN S FOR A DIS OF 13299 FT TH RUN 3279 32300300000100000008.0 Gaye �I :' 1 E O .Ap — Away M.P— 08AYL1w 1Qt3— tWP.nCoe+mm iMW� 14 364 Boyle & Drake, Inc. t-F--^ERTY 4M :H. . 'MM f4WWS WVNER M GRBK GHO HOMES LLC L.0.1 D 390012 500 NW MERCANTILE PL 7WP32 RNG 30MORE FULLYDESC AS THEN HALF PORT SAINT LUCIE. FL 31088 T E 10 AC OF THE SW OTR OF THE SE OTR OF SEC 3 L_s=Hnv 32390300000100000001.0 SHUS :,'s TF CT VERO BEACH. FL 32011 DBA: TAI(AREA: -t. '42308' - ACRES'. 50000 "PR VAL METHOD. Cost PRODUC11y/ryL088 s SON %: 0.00 ASSESSED VALUE _ Nwm SIY: 100.00 EXEMPTWN VALUE _ NSOH S6 T:: ODD TAXABLE VALUE - 0 0 201.S00 297.51, _ �r t Ertearo Wle olAq,rzsW. 3w'a,ery DNa PmbE OSO=f9021 f0:19:1lPM gP.[.CwnuW f�19900 15 365 Boyle & Drake, Inc. 3ROPOW 40W R RES OWNER tDCRBK 71,0 CflLLL L' 690 W� MERCANTU K TWPSZRNG30M FULLY DESC AS THE S HALF PORT SAJNT LLICIE. FL 349& OF EIQACOFTHE SWGTR OFIHESEQTR OFSEC 3 E, 0=4w"ST VEROW-40tAIM TAX AREA. Y'R­E "EAITVAIW '42307' _A%D M�RKET T - UARKF 294,350 ACRES 49000 ILUE 0 APPR VAI MET ROD, 0 S044 NSOH NSOH 56 MAN 16 366 Boyle & Drake, Inc. PROPERTY 42308 R *0940 '( ', TA1LA** T. . ZC"NG RS3 t"m OaecNpebe S09D19 4YDMY :.. PL `423683 NEM REASON SEC 3 TWP 32 RNO 39 00YT LOT 3 MORE FIALYOMAS PORT SAINT LME FL 34988 = 4t5,905 THE W HALF OF THE W HALF OF THE SE OTR OF THE SE OTR LESS THE 543591 FT OF THE W 299.79 FT ACRES'. 69903 0 APPR VAL METHOD' �- O DBA. SOH A. - E15995 32330300000700000008.0 �� NSOH 54 N.'. *It SRUS 31% 69TH �T VERQ.pGA*fLAW NSON 55 •..: �� o 706+GGRAGPHv ygs�nc LAST APPR. YR 9813 R, D ACCESS LAST INSP. DATE 06f09= I ZC"NG RS3 NEXT INSP. DATE Y USE PRRAAR0080 y OF *JPRV NEM REASON REMARH4 t00 Irv! Tslal 4'.:5[5 Paye i et 1 9UMANO PERMRS j ESecliw OSle al Agvawal. ,4rury DIIYil�1t 0592fdR5 IO1J'1BPM b/PatdCeRNfuW 1/ 367 Boyle & Drake, Inc. PROPERTY 42309 sBG 'Iria9t.cw67a(iDvrWr• !![ilGAt TN�gBOl�i 6��►�+►.r��""� 1 �71ErMMFT M�IIdM NR 'iral�rNar 4aliLpgt 1AX AREA' MONY MERCANTILE PL '42309' d9RFswaiu Ra ACRES, 2.6380 APPR VAL METNOO: c.. MA: 90N %: 0.00 NEON 64 %: 100.00 N9DN 66 %. 0.00 :41PROVEMENTVALUE 262723 JAND MAR10 1 150.535 TOTAL MARKET VALUE _ 413,256 AG VALUE 0 PRODUCTIVITY LOSS = 0 ASSESSED VALUE 413.258 EXEMPTFDH VALUE e TAXABLEVALUE 413258 1.- c1 1 eMtlw WN tlf AppNuI. J--, ale P1'n OB@!m26 1&13:1" bT Pr4CemmwE 1MtlDdaOe 18 368 Boyle & Drake, Inc. aaam doe�iwr pr+mWl�ic •423ia , ° aeGatwrar�a�ramaots EFw�Y scAs ... !i'AilfR'tlN1OP1�ML FT OF THE E2+AS weir. PORT84OJT1. 1 .. :. 103.3'4 .. ... ATIB7IB>r�MllliilAEB�,QFTHE $E OTR OF ACRES. 02100 z 0 11�E47ReE�4:M1�OiRf RORAOF 80 FT _ _ APPR VAL METHOD: SBA: SOH% 103.324 •111L tU0M11RM VWDEAp4R,>�11F7 ... 0„0 - Ei�p7101Kt 103324 *; UTILITIES TOM RAGPHY e t - OAO ACCESS lAii A�7E ' ZONINGRS-3NORMYP.W E' 4 t 1 PICTURE PRNIARY 1.15E 0100 Y OF I PRV i + NEM REASON HOLO 0910 FOR 2028, KK 0423. 7t(( jt f t t REMARKS BU/LDMO PERMITS I ISSUEDT ITAPEA ST FERMiT'- 0141202• DBL” A 4 f ? 1 - 1 -• 1 it > :T y I OIpIgA� NC p�IM�Mt1>f Ilm z �q•i gI11M1•FOOc 1# . 1411 too I�1 .1..11ilJ4!!.. ..............:1MLN►4......�. _ ...!!!L�!!!� ! . .....:. ......:.�!MI.l�III�....a:. '. '. RLMna� DAO. forge t G i Y6MRNMM+IW; A --W rww% mow* weRIO.42310 RrP 19 369 Boyle & Drake, Inc. Efiftllrbogeeel Aooa genu,-PNQe4: D6Raa'1025 1-1l try VanC rt�nuM VNtloJD10 20 370 rn�nR�«ancx z.,_ze �-aa1-r.:.r+noam lI'0011M AMI .. .R W,fool•. TAXAREA:::Ia . ,•: `4231U` LAND ARM7 Pd 300 �`;Y��•�����T'1E 288.79 TOTAL MARKET VALUE a 103.324 W i OTR OF COME. CO .RO ACRES: 03100 AG VALUE 0 OFEE. RUN OUR E FOR A DIS OF 80 FT APPR VAL METH06. Cog PRODUCTNTTY LOSS 0 SON%: 000 ASSESSEDVALUE = 103924 319089TH ST VERO BEACH, FL 32961 NEON 64 %. 100.00 EXEMPTION VALUE NSON 65 %: 0.00 TAXABLE VALUE = 103.324 Efiftllrbogeeel Aooa genu,-PNQe4: D6Raa'1025 1-1l try VanC rt�nuM VNtloJD10 20 370 Boyle & Drake, Inc. PROPERTY x120 R RES 10R02M6 .... i .. L"m OAsul W 3V3S ttObti - t/�IIIfWi R.030;7l8-, SEC I I TWP 32 S RGE 30 E NE 19 OF SW 114 LESS RD WESTON. FL 33326 ... TQTAL MMO(ETVALl1E _ 2050.720 ROW - .ACRES'. 37.3000_ AG VALUE - 10,085 APPR VAL METHOD-. C04 PROOOCTN(7V LOSS = 2.N0.854 3t70f100000000000001.0 DBA_ sc,,,% 0.00 ASSESSEDVALUE = ID086 0RU6 2225 QUAY DOM RO VERO SEACN, FL 32087 NSOH O4 Y..: 000 EXEMPTION VALUE - NSOH SO A_ 1 DO TAXABLE'VALUE = 10.089 . OH iIiFO[aMTIOn EgyPTKM UTILITIES LAST APPR mm TOPOGRAGPHY LAST APPR YR 2024 ROAD ACCESS LAST 61SP. DATE 0401!2024 ZONING R-3 NEXT NSP. DATE PICTURE PRIMARY USE. 0g0p 00F ppµV NEXT REASON REMARKS 1 0A0LOIN0 P09ON7f A ISSUE OT PERMIT TYPE PERMIT AREA ST PERMIT VAL SAAESMFOFANTW11::.: SALE OT PRICE GRANTOR. OEM INFO 12'11fd'!23 1. M.00D H WAYNE KLEHAMP WM 3666' 2191 11/09/2010 100 NLFKAMP _, `NAYNF OC , 2463! 1492 10101;101^ 2259x 'CAPSTONE RESDEV LY.'D'2464%1020 rs+,�eVrnno. usuraa d � •� ­ T ..1 -T2i :. .. ��, ._ 210. t,ag� t 1 t EOe�t.e Dale el ApdaaN. AMJAY W! R6MN. 06fQ1A35 )0:76.O6FAJ YMdOJ41% 21 371 Boyle & Drake, Inc. �., 6iEiC 0WORMA110N 2023 .,.rc IES LAST APPR. DIR P,-P,LAST APPR YR 2021 R01 ACCESS LAST1NSP. DATE 08A3RW33 20NiNGRS-3NEM INSP.DATE PRIMARY USE 0000 0 O IMII NEXTREASON REMARKS 2023 . PROPERTY 43893 R:. :.� 1SON2016 .. � .. ... _ _ .. ... TAX ARFA ISSUE DT PERMIT TYPE PERMIT AREA ST PERMIT VAL II,i F 1'_f,-...: iL.J= 0 L"M DO.CIpIMe �' i999OOMMEffCEPMIY OR STE--1119 .4 50 a330 SEC 107WP 32 RNG 39 gETNGTHEE HALFDFIHEE192 ORLANDO. FL 32819 93. TOTAAL MARKET VALUE TOTLLARKE a 433.600 AC OF THE NW OTR OF THE NE OTR LYING N OF QUAY DOCK ROAD ACRES: !LIW0 AG VALUE = 0 APPR VAL METHOD'. Coes PRODUCTIVITY LOW a 0 323910N WiW0WW3.0 DBA, 5011% 0.00 ASSESSEDVALUE = 433,300 SITUS VERO REACH. FL 32967 X60H 54% 100.00 EXEMPTION VALUE a XSOH 55 %w C M TAXABLE VALUE a 433 500 O9Mi. 6iEiC 0WORMA110N EXEMPTIONS .,.rc IES LAST APPR. DIR P,-P,LAST APPR YR 2021 R01 ACCESS LAST1NSP. DATE 08A3RW33 20NiNGRS-3NEM INSP.DATE PRIMARY USE 0000 0 O IMII NEXTREASON REMARKS PICTURE SIRdNO PlbNTS ISSUE DT PERMIT TYPE PERMIT AREA ST PERMIT VAL SALES INFOR IATNIN SALE DT PRICE GRANTOR DEED NFO !I'3C:023 5C -000W VVINTEREEACH: C Yv.^..3Ci C ti!. 1 019' 1Y 'BAILEY B 9,11 ITALLAVWW 1687: 1415 ,t Acre 0.5.3 WC mx ® SMCNL N .. S[h� Jvl ;+, ?M. i.. iwM TeW 433,5W S.tOx N wruu u u0� awA-0 4 Pa'. 1 E9ecnn 011e of AOpWeI'. AXe y Deb PA4eR: 10.29'.4TPM t7PauCmmaM yMSI 22 372 Boyle & Drake, Inc. N 4" R *3* � � - B...may. r - PdtCF�K�IC1116d1O��1115f .. YS 2025-D. TAX AREA. IMPROVEMENT 4ALUE 0 '43692' LAND MARKET 184,738 TOTAL MARKET VALUE __ i 484.730 ACRES: 20.5506 AG VALUE = 0 APPR VAL METHOD Oast PRODUCTNRY LOSS = 0 SOH ",'.: 0 00 ASSESSED VALUE = 14841M NSOH 54 %: 100.00 EXEMPTION VALUE - NSOH 65X 0.00 T—BLE :ALJC 1404.738 FwefJf Ellet+,'e•Dofe cl AppYY15/�6� /��� r,JT�.� 1 b/P�dpgPCYA Y/WIW7L9Z Boyle & Drake, Inc. k4- P~ Cotmty PoLtr A4o— - ...,2026 202 C p PROPERTY SEC 10 TTWP RNG 39 BEING TFE E XALFOFTHENEgTR s TOTAL MARKET VALUE - OF THE NE OTR LYWG N OF QUAY DOCK ROAD ACRES-: :0.3600 AG VALUE APPR VAL METHOD: C -i PRODUCTIVITY LOSS .- . SOH A'. 0.00 ASSESSED VALUE 3]38?000000?00000001.0 ... - - -. NSOX 61 %: 10000 EXEMPTK)N VALUE -. SITUS t1Ni.SSiGKED VF�tcieEARatH', .s+w NSOX 56 X: 0.00 TAXABLE VALUE 24 374 APMVALMETHM: Cad VrbmcTrirry LOSS z 0 32311000000100000"to - DBA: SM % 0.00 AMESSED VALUE = 25.300 SDUS UPM981 N" 1 MIIEAMLOL� N96N Sa',4� 10000 E%FMPTbN VALUE m %. 1.00-AXASIE VALUE _ 25,500 Boyle & Drake, Inc. inYn 1B� PRORE26Y APPRAI8ALV*1ORMA7tON 2D25 PflOPERTY 43728 R RES IQ23QC15 OWNERIO: TOIL SOUTHEAST LP COMPANY INC WAREA: Z'0 ' D DO—VT 955853 COMMERCE PARK DR STE tIX'i •43729• . • •. 102,050 10 TWP 32 RNG 39 BEING Ttf E HALF Of THE W NA1.F DRLANDO FL 32819 ORL T VALUE 102,850 OF OF THE SE OTR OF THE HE OTR LYING N OF WAY DOCK flCM9 ACRES: 12100 � = O APPR VAL METHOD: Cod PROWXWA Y LOSS = 0 323llsooloolawaoae.I DBA: BON %: 0.00 Al VALINE = 102AW 8OU8 UNASSIGNED VERO BEACH. FL32887 NSON"% 100.00 NEON 88 % 0.00 _ .:. ;. SKETCH INFOROATON UTILITIES LAST APPR OTR TOPOGRAGPHY LAST APPR. YR M11 ROAD ACC ES6 LASTINSP.DATE OG:0A21'2l ZONING RS -3 NEXT MSP. DATE PRIAARY USE DODO NOF VAIRV NEXT REASON '- - - REMARKS YULLODI potwTB - - - ISSUEDT PERMITTYPE PERMITA .. ST PERMITVAL - - - BAL"IMFORMAYM SALE DT PR X:E QRAIYTOR DEED INFO 11w2023 5.000,000 WINTERBEACHLLC WD1368G;602 01/OtRO04 47500 COOPALC40VMCO1ND 4887/1418 - i IrL - NMI .�;••+WiiypMss�nmwf rrsu - - "Wed" - tllemroD-MAW— tMtePmRE 0W.— "MOM MPaoCOminnt 26 376 Page1W t Ella[Y�e Deb el4Ww4. a^�£ Dau PAtee1. � 10.15:1l9M ]� U'Ab10-0R]A] 377 STE 20I '4224'1' TVALUE 4 THE 3TWNRUGJB BEING THE N HALF OF THE N HAIF TO�TALM OF THE HE OTR OF THE NW LESS ROW 'A ACRES. 9 0B00- AG VALUE "PR VAL METHOD: Cad. PRODUCTIVITY LOSS `DBA- SOH`.: ASSESSED VALUE 77J9030000tl1005NIW1.i SITUS 7C5D 39TH A'JE VERO BEACH. FL 31BE' N9OH N `.6: 190* EXEMPTION VALUE Page1W t Ella[Y�e Deb el4Ww4. a^�£ Dau PAtee1. � 10.15:1l9M ]� U'Ab10-0R]A] 377 Boyle & Drake, Inc. COMPARABLE DEED'S 28 378 Boyle & Drake, Inc. 312412'4014742 RECORDEDIM"MINOW"AWWASS.WLER, CLERK Or CIRCUIT COURT INDIAN RIVER CO iL BK: 3763 PG: I72i,.3)262 >D 2:1TAi 11306ftik ftillC Ai AMiMCbMI� . llllptt�nTilMlkittdom. t1,C Ii101lN1:>� .. YNIt►Ilollrb. n1.3il�6b W ITNESSBT10 111AT (irnmtm, lir and in a4xmadcrolion of the sum of THN VOLLAPOGId.lDll). MW otlW 11"twt11u1r1Nt►arBlt �rwia�t paid to tirantnt by Cirantec, the rsxcipi of which is lwm+y aclurowledged, bJ *M, jpi►111100A.y ttMtp01R1t� 1p Grantac, and Grantee's szlcecasors and asaiW faswver, all the right, titla, to �F IM tJlttl 10 i1�111 t1KIMs�il►.tplti pop* 00 " ") located and situated in ladlan Rivtn*OOlMytrloride and Wily descrihmdtrrft etc FliR PR(iP1iJPTY lifiS4R1➢TfCI,M, Sp•;E' �'XlilnJT 'A ` �17TA('llh:/J Ni,.ili'i#�1,114'!i M,fifiJ:' A f',tR:`fiF: TOOETIMIt with all improventestts, caseemms, tenements, 1mvditantcnts and appunenances belonging to or in any way appouinlog to the Property. S118JE.C'T to taxes hrr 2!125 and suhaegoeni yemm, no yet dor matt payahlc; covonanti, rcmmo cmemonts, mmrvations and bmiiations otracord, if asty,'wiihoat intaNion oforcmkm ar rcimpoaing mac. 7-i 1IAVE AND TO HOLD the same in fee simple forever. GRANTOR hereby specialty watrmrts this tido to lite Property and wiil defend the same atgalust tba lawful claims of all pemamla claiming by. through, or lmrlar Grantor, but none other. H* No 74-07-7381 F1011" st.>-�Wl WS"Amr rxvd P"c 7 C4 x 29 379 Boyle & Drake, Inc. d. aa,.: 2"743x 1 Fimik 4m1w WWFAVtf Deed Mrc x 94r3 30 380 Boyle & Drake, Inc. MI 3w m im lhoretyrA/dOOi: 31�`i3ni ct,cet VOW 1kmd4 F4 32467 hAVO r '�.we� erworr»4sa.aw��».�v�4arl�ta 7lteaarit Yfi,�aiei�at�iwwl�ar �o€�efs t�4at/�.al� iN. A"4($Wl^Otis iMOMMAOrlYtsmri^*&"W WVX#iU"MUX#Ub4Wdbed IroidOr OTlitdm%Owrded to official RwDm% 894 ^111W-41tD. ANef�a�it�eiaiatiboeiaiwltl,`rownsliip32sw�eh,>�fn�a3il�wabbw00u11IriClOrlllhritta LeasrfahwofwayyarU.�.�1, IMO+eU i 7% got 3 of the North i D acres of the S4yadnMQ p ftr of the SmdkmM Quarter. Gess Rwd right-of-way, Section 1% TMfe W 32 9omth, Range 34 last, said land lying end being in Ledian Riva Co mty, Florida. Boyle & Drake, Inc. CM 202#049233, OR M 10011 Plot" IA&S,_ Roilicordbd 0$14/20$4 sit 11 i30 Mij VAliqbel M. awwr, cioik or C*Urtio,: trevard OPB"T. 000': 4,49"s-06 TME, IiVmneq ofao" bv one "flum IV Lata A Cowpolia Alliance Ift 1 1, xae A#*Vr, Mt rtalaill MmnUM in brk Property Appraises Pa" LO, #111ift) Nwalgr(s) 28-17-23.00-76f Fft Na. 123D9D994 WARRANTY DEED This Warranty D"d, Nlace 1:be 8t-, Jdy 2 Va'dl, 2024 by SKA Properties, LLC, a Florida Limited Liatil" Company *I,— address is 2101 NE 207 Street N. Miami Beach, FL 33179 'pAw;QV#Tj1;; 00, a Florida Corporation. vilioiliptafteaddow1w 21555 Franklin Drive NE Unit 2, Palm Bey, FL 32905 Ii " aimitemes, M111111011119ft 7W seed Gww. for and In OpoldwaW at the surn V4 Too and 091100 Daftirts;, llltd ww-vow ft amommomm Is hereby suis A&D it ftiOSM; MkOWMit .. ... .. Tf-P&O"ftbrid1he honwand,lifft atMOil I 1 911 11U florlids In dialInOMW Grarl'I'm(s) "Win The subject property is vacant, unriatiIN TOGETHER with ad the lenernlagg, hereditaments and appurtenances thleft Odoilit"'qw-f" appertaining, To Have and to "Old, the Sam in fee airrois forever. And the Grantor hereby ooverisaft WftgW low"dot eft llldllitt sinwie: that the Gramm has 11-1111."411111111111 solod" "jo-11 hereby fully warrants 11110 will to *0 *W,Md. ft 11111111a persons whomsoever: arid OW said -JW jiftj loom, fT`V ftMV "a oft: l29o00 4 32 382 Boyle & Drake, Inc. DR BK 10011 96 11" IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Gr;muw has hereunto set GramWo hand and seal the day and year first above �tMteR SM R4 Tiff PASENCE UFTHE eDiLMMNG VWTNESaS M6SEPARATE (MINTERESTED IIYITNESSEB REowREo SKA PRWERTIES, LLO, AFWMDA LltAIMD LIAEWLITv Mines I Waftre: Printed Name In 1lI11111i7lC Kuptexbeurg Revocable LJmg Trust 'N MSSAddress t0j1) M WCIgr6Arq M Susan K. KtaPisrbstp, Trustee _ - 'lVto,sss S+g�awra: Printed Name : `'. - - - - 'A**Se Addte93. 10 Ai SPC Stege of Flom County of erevanl The Toregang instrumLM was ae mooviedged heftee me by nseans of 0 physical presence or 0 online noIarizaborr, tnie 81h day of M.", 2424 &V Swan K. KuAaftrg, trustee, as manager for SKA Properties, LLC, a Flynds Lzn*W L%ab+lry Comwany. MbewThsy is+are n Personally Known OR Ja Prodwced dnvers license(s) as IdentM�on. —;'ROM L BUR '- Tur" Notary Public $ re 4rrPrinted Name ' Shannon Zeiler 04FOAM E001111111Ir+.IM My ca nmiction Espk*s 0 online 14otivy (Check Be* tt aekn ... MIMtMjrt1a1N4eissYeM etien� Completed via Remote online Notarizadm using 2'way AudloNMeo tedwliW. Flo N... ,22, YWON NolwyCam Doc IC 796694ai.36e8.4caa.a4a3.4iwYftt8t2&I 33 Page 2 ar e CIA] Boyle & Drake, Inc. OR BIC 10011 PG 1347 EXHISIT "A" LEGAL DEWUPTION to1�e1 f AIM►�li tib atMSouN�arK Quaff ISE' 3l, MIIMi1 fMiM� �' 3TEagl, Mi40at1 PfmRa. Excepting the Scuth 2i 1�1.y1wil,F, AVliiareg the "hKdiA� liam Drive and Vgmncis DOYK and AIML R that pm*m * bee prop" wild to Hams Cdrp t#Wn AIIMlr111//'iMd t , 100and recorded la � ck Records So* 2130, Pape 1862. Pto*;= i�11� MNM� delim bad as . . ApIMirmt at the southve#t w"uwW of 1wat one-Cwrter of SOOD 23y 11wwaj SMWk $7 East. SrwmW- a psipn >rs gY tAgaRPMlkutertY desvtb�I�tMRdlUUaliC�110ty1m in0 of the r at saidt �t" . . +�ptRRflttaYline o(�Ii�l R4i�tYlls r 04"1Ma clow nalkiR�7+D9'wittMtnee�M�.�penca�1111tNIf�iMlii'�tt,NMNt�4r► rli4111taSotlEtdN1A, dM� . u �I►llrf�iMtlNl+l WOM2kOWmatunS lr. 11/�lesaldh i� 1�i#i�Mt af�rrt)itwtrglgat.elm-Qu�llrat�aSMl��1u1r11Ri1�1;id11 . ++Ml WMA Nwl i tl�Q(1+�i,�4 �I1t�IF Ali Nl�t Nilf �'�It1It�wEw�rMIR W w�li orieyraAwdtt�ld. ts`1Al�tga�rl{a�'"'$d16raMf11o1REtltiaadlllmhlNi�1� fed io Are PWM ar Qepbtnirty. rk +�.. 123DWID04 NoWy%am Doc 10 79669det-3da:8-4caa- 3.4o?`6ct6c28d 34 384 Boyle & Drake, Inc. SK: 3684 PC: 960 IN WI NM WHMtWF, GMW hes duty:ewAded this 11plammut as of the dente firm writica aloe - 36 386 Boyle & Drake, Inc. 3hr YS4 PG; !H11 VNMNNM mw V, IN pin-- +f+aMpMgy VIf11'WISB't . . PMT tiAlYlt#~ " TAIM S PRI a SCA'IB{iP ..f �a ommow. :ems F having 1YMItO' .Fa1.i1G8� pIGSCItCt 6(() 011IIFte @(NHREr"�11011 k}1L5 _ clay of AAarch, 2M �rIliliM/4ltlnl dI�6YM� ifpfida lineittcl4eabiiiiy cY+mpany, on i�chalf of the limkcd liability company. Lmi Signshn:of Notary PANVI�11a1RY Primt.' ypeMalnp Name GYNOINY 11MI1 NMI � MoiNM11! t'�MNe�'�'�SIMIA► 111ww"Ally known OR Pmduoed Ide+Nificacian; Type of Wntificalion Pro&NW F* tib- =4"7S Florlrbi Speci�i.M `i1M�d 3 03 37 .387 i Boyle & Drake, Inc. 13K: 3684 PC: 962 Parcel 1; Commencing at the 80aetrrt at eortrelr oft ot3s tfreaittte ttr�mbtj "".741s to tete P"lt Ik glrisdce running Nmth 33 ymift Eitenee So 3$6 Sot illiam a OwA 83 yards; dame West 330 yards to "t sat' i3eginning, of Sceftit X.TwarAlp 32 SOMIXRtrere.3 604said land lying and being in Inditaa Ria rt:+oerlb', Florida. Parcel 2: ' U,East 10 acres of tic Narthwcst 114 of thv Southeast 1f4 of Section 3, Township 32 South, Range 39 East, Uss toad right-of-way for 73rd Sireet. Said land lying and being in Indian River County, Florida. PaRtet a• Mm We# 113 ofstr Be* 1/2 of the Northwest 1.146(OaSoutheast 114 of Sectlion 3, Township 32 Sotah, Range )9 Rest, iew River 3ooeity, Flea-idd, LESS time lftdt 30 feet thereof. Parcel 4: Beginning 327.9 feet West of Arc Southeast.caarrtkr0*& west 114 o[ihe SoodmW MkWia t 3, Township 32 South, Range 39 Put, Indian R vslr Chat i►1��lG gratee;artnning N&*t37t Wgs� . West 327.8 fed; thence Sauth 1328.9 fleet; thetaal 3 7 6 "Iffiftr Pollrlol"$eginnirt6. i�ca 5: 7itaS" In Odtis butt to MC s grow swbu r 1r1'af** scat W n[3edtdioa 3. Town** godw. irtr+let 6r IUNtx*Oao4ofdwSp*-10UmOfft804111MMlJWO>Xt*SaWheut1ACO itefiatt3.. .32 Soak Relye 39 880, h0m R. Mer Care fir, FloriOir, Parcel 7: .... Bttgin at tiro So tt{na i aoteer pCcio�etaeearer~t l.at S.lteotlen 3, Town tip 32 . Rtmp 3! 80t, dopie nm . Nm1h 75 yards, Raml333 yet, stawk 73 yWAk.W09 M yok to Hite Ptaiht OMMOMMUNO fy�q iw iNd�lar River County, Fttitf& irartiei g: The Wast 0"allf of rite Wed em4all(afthe 8 Wont 9lf# 0(1118, 4awhold LIM 11he SOME 1311,41 tiwet of tine V104299,79 fix4 in 9Wlont 3, Tires 33 st>tagy 39:11; Iva River Qtr l+lox[dit. Filvmllu-4N"13 Fliodda Special Warrenty need }iyl�eott! 38 .388 Boyle & Drake, Inc. OK: 3684 Pc: 963 Pate[ 9: Thr South 435.91 feet of the West 299.1ft;tt(,* VVLR�tt�+l�t#tO Wit l�tlPt>f fbl0 1N1:6t ft Southeast 114,1„ FSS ANL) EXCHPt trie t*> ame ila v�te�t8 ea end a ,rt r rect*44 Stenon 3. TOW .32 Sttuti4knga39 500. iykt In ftWOtEi ,>lrtot�dr:' POW 10. Beginning at the Southwest corner of the South 435.41 feet of the West 244.74 hd ofl.0 Wall[ 112 tuft Wei: V2 of the Southeast 114 of the Southeast !/4 of SeNion 3, Township 32 South, Range 33jwK thcnac rued'* . Bast 80 feet, thence due North ISO feq, dMw dW West 80 feet, thence due South 150 foot to the Point 0( Bvginning. Less and except road right ofwe%(, ftWorth Winter Beach Road. Said [arid lying and being in Indian River County, Florida. IHSS AND EtCEPT[NO the additional rigM-.of-q* Blr llto Stt+oet uouveyed to Indian Rivcr t out by StatErtaay Warranty Deed recordedy Bock 2257, Page 1602, of the Public Records of Indian River County, Florldp, Boyle & Drake, Inc. Me im t+Etr mgr, >EMv'M UU i a idit. TAX W�i P•wnrtred try and relurn to: Erika Aluesta .. -.. AppleTower title A Eocrors. LLC .. .. - 2697 Fxrsetive Park Dr., sake 307 _ wee�t4 PL S33S1 FOsI AT4Q21Ne iN.11MgN nada d 11�t r H. +weyn+ Klekarep, Inc. tJIW M the a, IL ' MOM l� 4M* a gds 1!!h Place. Vero Beath, FL �lii*1Mo1w tiornes, a G t�mlied wish atey whom vast oRice adoress is t!'N', Ijfif6i1R1 "041 suits 1, Weelea 1% 1S32s sramee: M1R1►1sId11tIfuM M Isr ■' idyl alg 1E9feartstneaamsra ua anhsis, al M sPt�iNlff•Msr. 1�1�R 1 IiIM�M eeneaa xaslow arwrrlM,ad ur�, wda arra wemes) iM of the rimdF7W'AM N01100 DOLUM (510.00) and o9terrltlit�iil tl9aa � b1' a� gtevrea, tiw rots!vt w+nreof is hweby ao111 :: �; ... .fic aro granaaa'x news end asspne famwer, the � sDdseat�ed etid " 111serGplNRy.Flartda k"A The Nnrthesst r O*1M) of Wt - *urger WN 1141 of Soo Ms 11. Township 32 Mount. RarW NdlOn River County, toes and mrspt rights of way far public roam and drafead9M11W. Parcel tdwtWWMbn Number. 3239110000U@80001-0 "act to Curnrn Taws, EasamwiftA d ResvtcdWaf Rocords. Together wash as the WO us ts, hoe dppurtolt9 f9 thomw Nkw4ftlritl To Have and to HaMrllla10f101�k#Iwrr. wrth Sststala NlIs9�'1�PMIOiw that saki land is OrcumbIr. OsOernb� 31.2Q?�.. , In Wtlnea6 Wewraof. granmr has' 1t sof►�si/tsl lrte day and year area above WOM 40 Boyle & Drake, Inc. OK: M66 PG: 2195 uignevj. 3emkd and dale and in ow froserm. iiM:OF ROHM ILM" KI wv. Inc. a. Cogxwalian crgm ee. *Wim!' ! at Ct crag 1raM.adna Indnr.rr-.r.r.rlr`wiir.'�irrn...�si'tdr. . . 41 391 Boyle & Drake, Inc. 3120231111611758 RJECORPRP iltl 9M, t1!' fiRV AN:Io fUTIAR, CURK OP CUtCW COURT 11141PLiA1 R Ci YL RK: 3666 PG: 692.12W2[1238.31 AM 0Vit3('1'AX.P111$3fi,AAr.AA 1`.Oiv PavNMnMIICI.reJ�ur,+d d� u,r,i In dr reaelnl k•' {. tla1vS ��111r1v �t s,r 9e<aee AvNra,tlsfp alt[ SPECIAL WARRANTY DEEI) Parcel 1D Nw: 32-39-10-11)WO-1OUl"0)01 32.34-10-00000.10WOO D02 449.10-O0000• i 000-00003 3z-n,w40040-1000-00045 THIS SPECIAL WARRANTY DEED made and cxccutod this ft day of ber, 24323, by WINTER REACH, LLC. a norids limited liability company C'GRWrOR"jy,'Wi wwrg dlt4d�lli�AltMn is 26 NE 166th Street, North Mianti Beach, Fl, 33162, and TALL SOUTHEAST CbROAM.0101-1 a Delaware corporation ("GRANTEE"), whancc pnat office. uddvess .ie 1144). Washi W*N PA 19034 (whetiever used herein, the terms "GRANTOR" ''QRiAt1�1# dliQl A[t :: parties *'* hrojumcnt and the heirs, legal representatives and assigns ofiadk4diiiak adA:MN i[ionatilNls and assigns of companies)- . W!7•iM1>E�6TN: THAT GRANTOR, ii,r :inti in consideration of the stun of "fen 11iQ I80,do1IW ($10.00] end other good and vatualtle cansideratiorts in haul quid to GRANTOR h;y GRANTEE, the 0*0*1 whereof is borft 8tkaw3+ted i, does Itenb) grant, "gin, 5ci1, convey and centlirm unto the GR4Ii4w9,*e teal proporly heroinatber gibed, and rigliis and interest in said real properly ktealed in IWien Rivet County, Fhnids, lerac+it: Parcel 1: The Earl 1.+2 or the Nr 1/$ orgMlltR grog fi,t f0, Township 32 Sough, Range 39 1:am1, lying and being in Indian PWda. lying North of Quay hock Road. Parcel I& 32-34-10-00660-1000.00001 1'arcei l The Elea[ IIS of the Fast I" serrat of Ike NW 114.of til 1* i!4 in SectH,n 10, TowrskW2 Sontlh, Rouge 391110ok bft and being fo Indian River Count %, Florida, and lying NorHl of Quay Doak Mood. Puna iii. 32-39.10.0olwo-I ill"[1b3 Parcel3: `I`he East 112 or the West Ill otiile 59 Uo d do NR 11 *1lecili nt lA, TOWN111 ip U Snplh, Range 39 East, lykq lard Min$111 lift lliwi Cwabr, lKlsdagt ItintlA of Quay (lock Road. Parcel 10% 32-39.110.10060-1000-00045 42 392 Boyle & Drake, Inc. RK: 3666 PG: 693 Parcel 4s The west 1t2 of the Northeast 114 of the Northeast IM of Section'14;! bwnship 32 South, Range 39 last, lying and being in Indian River may, Fiorkh6 bring North of the right-of-way for Quay Dock Road, Imanyperbo itlyllYg in Road 41it-of-wa► IN North Winter Beach Read {69th Street), Parcel ID: 32-39-4&400WI41l00-0 MM Parcel 3: The North U2 af4tr" Mlstt Tl2 of the l3ortReast'1/4 bfthottitr isf 114 in Section l0, Township 39 $pat Ib age 39 Fast, lying and biting, in ladlil� illwer County, Mrida, lying Nor sttAte AXbf-ot way fur (quay Dtwk Road. Parcel IDS a3-3061" I0Wlptul-00(46 I tb6"163"M k wlb w to the following: i. Qesl:Watetaxes for litsyeV2M,ftlii j`,**M 2.. QoadMotes, covenants, restrielkm, iitnitalkwiiNbott"000 t whir itt aid Ip.tieilltp4tuC samo; 3, Zeniny,1'mrtr caion�.pt�ei oae,aMlQc `i�giore/ 1� r�uli rity. 1M GUAI TOR hp* ovvitWft wM ftAWM0W MANl10P. h %WFAVY q0=d at Said lad In fn �impIc; that .Ci Aird it Nelii eKw1 ittwlW tlr oMl y to ildl ipld ttaettad 'otlil mil that GRANTOR does herdby hilly t#alwo IIII{ t�n to fs� pd tYld lits NeIN tl lilllllf 1NR 111: claims of all persons claim ingby,dMavilih wWWlvrGMbfM100leawnow ad* SI(MITI}RF.&C3DM!'QAlDD111�;�AiSb ' 43 393 Boyle & Drake, Inc. 44 394 Boyle & Drake, Inc. 312024041161117 RECORDED IN THE RMORDS.W-SIVAN L. BUTLER, CLERK OF CIRCUIT COURT INDIAN RIVER CO FL 8K: 36118 PQ 2260.414f2024 M% PM D DOCTAX PD SXO011.09 La�A AilwiMl�_ 106# Mii i1rMC' 177it.�l� F9be'Stunbera>F�1 , ►i.raAMeeettikt,MatltwfleeiRiq�r1 HDow . wltase �eta�¢a a�n'� SCE C9�1e►ArAe, 9i1iie30i.?►+IDk iCSoiti�lnBKll;ltlrlM!r,>�M>�wl 'tii� �Y L1Ni ntedoths Inc-.�r�MipAwNalrMMe�A1�rp � Ndinat��3i,�C Vero Btiih.I'L U%3, graxseeet tw1,nMYer ON "min *0 tap" w *a ai Mtaic fyel elft +w� a�4af +nAhadwk+wlMe'ara�on�Mr�tataw>fealNer+r,risrw�Mwunrw www" 'dw eeid vww1 Por god ft 411" mm" of do 00, or 'FE AND WOAQ* POUAVS i=1FW and Ofiff /Aad aad vlthttlbh-fit to Wd SOW: it Jwd OM by at1W A�+�. she roa�':MAroeot % hey haa. tletnttea knr lk,ed s++d "M to Awi Dlid hnepe. ad {emf a 1, . a.ed ei tt fireMei: Ilsejbmtiiwkg abetalr:. ha3a;,la0beaty ip llndiee Aivtr Coeaty, Ptee'Ida t?ia-vvit See Cxw" Aw aitoeiled. Tvge*erslithailtlseicnemcros,he,editamemsand appunc,mgceetM/Mip 9Cblteiy1M1i0a Ot1111btt& To RM vied to EM. *4 mftr ht fee simplc ibrckcr. subject to10edealnentt aanditiomt, testrktbA „#nd maaecs of retard, Asm the yra,awr herctry c—atts♦ with aai4 9—tee Ort On pow is kWfift.1ph l Of'"M 10111AW60 0 Wpt0 dio it c i soebos �eod aid IOwW mAadiy to m mad OOeauy sw bads"{irA ytrewoe hlrrby vartttMtt the dtic p Nisi irld ltld yell dedegd the emcee .apixpt the fewAd iWii .e W pe acro wherno PWW , . tmd' 1hM acrid Nr, , is fmet all mombramm exceptam adcniiag ai Aed4eenit0 i {fl it. L and wail the day and year first aurae aftm. $IAtrod. sbeekdxneidelireeed fn aoepeeaeaiee: .. Buebk1A.C. tri ithiDaq LiiiiNi t npeny {x1 ia7tC55 Mnxed Name W"Q.�iimci[ Manegct--�• P.O..Addws, 9 2t4 6 or 11 a DW, �A The i�teWWM wu adaitrwl jW be&*ace ftm d 1�7�a1 pr+�enee er�„jbnii�t �Ml�gq tllb dltroiFebruegr3QZtbyDinielC.eunelR6rhntltrof wtro lutsrrrt�r[aitbo pm&ww s ddvel'e NCO== ideetllkatlon i +ct.[y stettr.p � CioA Ce,gx;�,; . �r�c Rt2�0i,2t� Mrsan„rhrt,a E — 45 395 Boyle & Drake, Inc. Ric: -ihhR PC: 2261 L A That portion of OWW"114t v+y Government Lot 4Was 3�itrM�3lsouth, RAnV43P11 tt0 �lfijtWs b11[Ja� Rwi6vteerrCttoueetikn,11l11IiMsl�ibtIMA011 lMNr4940w.* u94e�w2.*i 1r2 of Governsest Lot t aftililits 3, Tswnshgt 32 South, kiljo 1fst, lrulion River County, i br* And Nt 112 of the 4 lit of the NE 114 of the N% 1A of Section 3. TowtMh%32 South. Range 39. Last, Indian River County, ltlwiddt. being more partitularly described asfolowst Being a part of Governmtst l.ot 4. Section 34,Township 31, South, Range .301100 m d a part of the Government Lot 1, Section 3, Townsbhp 32 South, Range 39. East and a part of the Northeast quarter of the Nortbuist quarter of Section 3, Tawmbip 32. South. Range 39 East. Indian River County Florida, bring more fully described as follow.: Beginning of the southwest corner of sand government tot 4; thence N.6rl2'36"E. along the west line of said gmerament lot 4 and also being the east right of was line of 39th Avenue, a distance of 654.00 flet; theare N4915413"E. along the common property line per boundan list agmement as described in Beed Book 14, Page 241 of the public records of Indian River County, Florida, it distance of 1,099.74 feet to the shoreline of the tndian Rh*,; thence the following calls along the shoreline of the lndlaa River, Sd1000'3] "W., a distance of S7,09 feet; theare S 20°0ti'31 "11'., a distance of 19.29 feet; thence 5.38°8249"!'«, a distaaee of 20.56 fret; thence S.02°29 5914'., a distance of 2,349 feet; thence S.20132'07"W., a distance of 1$.51 teat; theme! S.191l4'00"E.. a distance of 30,67levy thence 3.03x16' 12"E., a distance of I" fret; thence S.40000'47"E., a distance of 28.58 feet; theme S.47007'31"E,.6a distance of 55.94 few; theare Ti `9°00',12"E., a distance of 17.53 feet, thence 3.49°43'22"%., a disuse of 32.50 fb* thew* 5,26017 WE. a distance of 38.3S Beet+ thence 5.26044' I1"E.. a distance of 34.00 feet; thence 5.59°41'32"1 4is distance of 4243 feet; tbcaee S.53'12'44"K , a distance of 30 9 Lett; thence SA104T69"E., a distance of 32.10 teerl thence S.52°40'03"E„ a distance of 19,22 Teti; thence S.ti600S'03"E., a distance of 17.14 feel; theme S.1505T57"W.hllt distance of 9.64 feet; boats 5.15'30'32"F , a distance of 24.07 feet; theare 5.62°06' 12"E„ a distance of 11,33 feefl' thence S;OP3T55"E,, a distaste of 31.98 feet; thence S.18"Srsil"E., a distance at 29.63 feet; thence 5.20001' 14"E.,*. distance of 44-1,1 fort; thence SAV4216"E., a distance of 19.73 feet, thence S.13°10'51"11'" a distaste of 16.25 theme* &W5i'56"E., a distance of 32.32 feet; thence S.Og°Si°54"E.. a distance of 30.59 feet; thence 53513310M.rf. distance of 43.73 toot, theme &&34143"E., a distance 9( 2&65 feet; thence 5,43"3617"%., a durance of 55.37 feall thence 5,450019' Ifr'E„ a dislonce of 48.79 feet; thence S.W39'37"E„ a distance of 37.33 feet; thence Sit°18'29"F„s3 distance of 34.68 het; thence S.SS 36'1' IL. a distance of 33.17 feet; these* S.70"20'03"E., a distance of 71.11 fatly thence S.3511 5'42!*E., a distance of 39.18 feet; them" S.2301 810"E, a distance of 38.66 feet; them" 5,2747 33"1�#I0 distance of 47,15 het; thence S.21°40'36"E„ a dlstame of 51.67 feet to the south line of the North half of the NYi�p *W of said Government Lot 1. thence S.09059'44"W. along said south liar, s distance of 1,174.33 tort; thence rat1 .""59'44"W. along the south line of the North half of the North ball'of the Northeast quarter of the Norlhll quarter of said Section 3, a distance of 1,328.77 feet ditme Ni,W01' IVE, along the west Use of said '40h11lM if quarter of the Northwest quarter and also being that east right of wap Yne of 39th Avraue. a distarwr.f11M the Point of Beginalog. P.rcei Identification Number: 3139340001n100.KM10001.0, 323940300DIM Mi1000001.0, 323940MMMa61MMUM01.1 46 396 Boyle & Drake, Inc. QUALIFICATIONS 47 397 Boyle & Drake, Inc. Qualifications of the Appraiser Stephen M. Boyle, MAI State Certified General Real Estate Appraiser RZ 3470 Academic Education Bachelor of Science in Business Administration -Finance, Minor — Economics University of Central Florida Spring 2007 Real Estate Appraisal Classes Steve Williamson AB 1 Lake Mary, Fl Completed May 2003 IFREC Real Estate School AB H Orlando, Fl Completed October 2006 IFREC Real Estate School 15 Hour USPAP Orlando, Fl Completed October 2006 Appraisal Institute General Site Valuation and Cost Approach Orlando, Fl Completed October 2008 Appraisal Institute General Sales Comparison Approach Orlando, Fl Completed February 2009 Appraisal Institute General Market Analysis and Highest & Best Use Orlando, Fl Completed August 2009 Appraisal Institute Real Estate Finance, Statistics, and Valuation Modeling Miami, Fl Completed September 2009 Appraisal Institute Advanced Sales Comparison and Cost Approach, Orlando, Fl Completed November 2009 Appraisal Institute General Report Writing and Case Studies Ft. Lauderdale, FI Completed March 2010 Appraisal Institute General Income Approach Part I Orlando, Fl Completed March 2010 Appraisal Institute General Income Approach Part H Orlando, Fl Completed June 2010 Appraisal Institute Advanced Income Capitalization Louisville, Ky Completed October 2012 Appraisal Institute Advanced Concepts & Case Studies Ft. Lauderdale, Fl Completed March 2013 48 398 Boyle & Drake, Inc. Numerous real estate related courses were completed at the University of Central Florida including Real Estate Law, Real Estate Investment Analysis, Basics of Real Estate Appraisal, Price Theory, Urban and Regional Economic Issues. Proficient in Argus Software Continuing Education consists of a minimum of 30 hours every two years as required by the Florida Real Estate Appraisal Board. Professional Experience Boyle and Drake Inc. 80 Royal Palm Pointe, Suite 401 Vero Beach, Florida 32960 Commercial Real Estate Appraiser Integra Realty Resources -Orlando 28 W. Central Boulevard Suite 300 Orlando, Florida 32801 Commercial Real Estate Appraiser Boyle and Drake Inc. 3305 Flamingo Drive Vero Beach, Florida 32963 Residential Real Estate Appraiser Types of Appraisals Completed 4/09 to present 3/06 to 4/09 6/03 to 12/05 (Part Time) CommerciaUIndustrial/Retail/Snecial Purposes Distribution/Manufacturing Warehouses Office Rental Studies GSA Fair Annual Rent Studies Office Buildings Insurance Replacement Cost Reports Apartment Complexes Residential Developments Restaurants Bed & Breakfast Lodging Facilities Branch Banks Wetlands/Conservation Lands Automobile Dealerships Mini Storage Condemnation/Inverse Condemnation Shopping Centers Private Schools Religious Facilities Mobile Home Parks Mixed Use Developments Grocery Stores Condominiums Auto Body Shops Leasehold Interest Vacant Land (All Types) Land Encumbered by CDD/SAD Bonds Developments of Regional Impact (DRI) Golf Courses & Private Clubs Ground Leases Cell Towers Billboards Correctional Facilities Wildlife Sanctuaries 399 Boyle & Drake, Inc. Professional Affiliations & Licenses " Designated Member of the Appraisal Institute #501667 State of Florida Certified General Real Estate Appraiser RZ 3470 .. a i a r: ♦ '� :' • i d� REAL ESTATE APPR �.: ` .. APPRAISER HEREIN IS ;.'.r •. 5 OFC RI XN .r B4YLE, STEPHEN M _ OYAL PALM PQJNTE, SUITE 4 ROBEACH;` �FL32960 . + 4 , EXPIRATION EMBER 30, 2026"r' Always verity licenseeat MyFloridal icense.com,; > x , 401 REAL ESTATE APPRAISAL REPORT OF 36.99 -ACRES OF VACANT RESIDENTTAL LAND LOCATED AT 3005 73RD STREET, VERO BEACH,_ INDIAN RIVER CiIUNTY, FL 32967 Prepared For: Indian Raver County Ms. Wendy Swindell (� Assistant Director, Parks & Conservation 1509 9" Street SW Vero Beach, FL 32962 Effective Date of the Appraisal: June 9, 2M5 Date of the Report: June 24, 2025 Freed by: TUTI'i E-ARWIELD-WAdNER APPRAISAL & RESEARCH, INC. Matthew Jehs, MAI, State Certified General Real Estate Appraiser RZ2806 Jason Malick, Trainee Appraiser R125267 FileNanw. AC'25-2331 402 Research, Inc. Tu"'!4 FL 32901 Matthew W. Jebs, MAI, Can Ow RMM6 Gary DtGacomo Can Gm RY.1530 Email: tawAt-a-w.mm Email Umns(aft-a-wxom Phone: (321)723-7,010 Fax021) 723-4375 June 24, 2025 Indian River County Wendy Swindell Assistant Director, Parks & Conservation 1509 91' SftVa SW Vero Beach, FL, 32962 Re: Real Estate Appraisal Report 36,99 -Acres of Residential Land, Located at 3005 73td Street, Vero Beach, Indian River County, FL 32967 File Name.? AC252551 At your request, we have prepared an appraisal for the above referenced property, The subject property is legally described in the accompanying report; of which this letter is hereby made a part of and incorporated therein. This report is for your exclusive use and we are not responsible for any unauthorized use. This is an Appraisal Report as defmed by Uniform Standards of Professional Appraint Practice under Standards Rule 2-,2(a). It presents a discussion of the data, reasoning, and analyses that were used in the appraisal process to, develop the opinion Of I value, Additional supporting documentation concerning the data, reasoning, and analyses is, retained in our file. The subject consists of two adjacent parcels with a total of 36.99 -Acres with frontage along 73rd Street in Vero Beach. The parcel has approx� 19.45 arrest or .53% wetlands as indicated on the U.S. Fish and Wildlife National Wetlands Inventoty Mhps. It is unlikely development would occur in this area due to development restrictims and a future land use of C-2 Conservation, allowing I unit per 40 acres. There are 17.54 acres of identified uplands zoned RS -3 Single Family Residential Dish -W (up to 3: units per, acre). This area appears that it could support future development. The property is not listed for sale nor under contract for pumbme. The property is further identified as Indian River County Property Appraiser Parcel IDs 32390300000003000001.0 and 32390200000500000001.0. At the request of the client, the purpose of this appraisal is to estimate the Current Market Value of the subject property's Fee Simple estate in, its "As Is" condition, e#'ective June 9, 2025. This letter of transmittal is not an appraisal report; however, the attached report sets forth the data, research, and analyses that support our value conclusions. Based on the appraisal described in the accompanying report, subject to a Limi'thtg OmOitions and Extraordinary Assumptions, we have made the following value conclusions: Value Conclusions Premise Interest A raisedEffect Current As Is Market Value Fee Simple 6S $1 Please reference Page 6 of this report for. important information regarding the Limiting Conditions and Assumptions; Page 9 for. Extraordinary Assumptions, and Page 15 far scope of research and analysis for this appraisal, including property identification, inspection, highest and best use analysis and valuation methodology. Acceptance of this report constitutes an agreement with these conditions and assumptions. We certify that we have no present or contemplated fature interest in the property beyond this estimate of value. The .appraiser has not performed any prior services regarding the subject within the previous three years of the effective date of this appraisal. The intended users of this report is Indian River County, c/o Ms. Wendy Swindell, Assistant Director, Parks and Conservation, and is intended only for use by them in estimating the `- market value of the subject property. Parties who receive a copy of this report do not become a party to the appraiser-client relationship and do not become intended users of this report unless the parties were specifically identified as such at the: time of the engagement for services. We believe you will find this report to be self-explanatory; however, you we invited to contact us should you have any questions or require further information relative to this. matter. We thank you for the opportunity to provide our professional services. Respectfully submitted, Tuttle-Annfield-Wagner Appraisal && Research, Ind,: Md#WW .few,VA Jamcbm01310rMO& t R80 Ttidiwe, 404 TAAam CONTENTS Summary of Important Facts and Conclusions R . N.H.,. 5 Limiting Conditions and Assumptions ........ »...:.... ..............:..:N ...H:.......H.:w«,.>,.;, «; 6 Extraordinary Assumptions.:... H....... ..,..... ......... ........ . ....:...F:......:.•:.. 9 Identification of Subject.... ,:..:• ........ .......:. .......................• ................10 Purpose of the Appraisal ...:. ..................:. .........H.�,..........\ ...... .....,.,.}.�...,..•.. 10)\ Clint.................................H....•.........................N. .. NRM.H ..H,i..H•. 10 P . •...... ..NI ..;1«l F.H.sir.N Intended Use and U$ex of Ato .H.:.l .41..1i.a..SHit•}«. H.. t. Owner of Record and Sales History,. .....:............:.....«..........:.,.... ..............11 Existing Leases, Rentals or Use; Agreeme mft ................ N...R.... ............... LegalDescription ....... H........ N ...... ...N...............:..,,,,.HH,.H,HH.;...... t . ,.,.N.,..,...,H«,i..ir.....«, l ScopeF.o�fy WF ork ..............................: ............ ......,, . ,.,.................,... ..........tH..1S LocationMap ........................ k4o.. a...•«:«: F.......:...t7 Neighborhood Analysis.....H...H............:....Y......::........,:...............„.:,.............. 19 Zoning......... ......... .. ............................. ......•............. 33 ZoningMap................. ............. ............. ...........::.,...H..... .. ...SH4.................HH. 34 FutureLand Use Map ... .H, .... ,......... ....H.... �:,.......................... .............,.. , ..«4....H 3 Assessment and Taxes ..................................... H...:::.. \..H...«,,...::,, T....••..:.::.s.H.{.YNr.ii.tiii.M:F.hi. 35. �./� �./!. y �1\ Property Description.................H«..«t: .HH• . ......:........Y ..�F( ......... .\•.).}..........•...... 36 WetlandMap—.. ...:.........................; . ........ ................. :.. ...:..,: 37 Highest and Best Use .... ................ .. . .......... ... ............ ...H..: 43 Valuation Methodology ,,- .. ...... ......�.............................. 47 Sales Comparison Approach — Lattd�Valuati+dn.....«......::. . ............... .........•.,. r:....N. 48 LandComparables ........ ............... . .,....:....................:....................:F. .:.;... 48 AnalysisGrid .................................................... ........ ........... ....... ...................... 55 Sales Comparison Approach Conclusion.....:............:.........H......,:.. .....,...........N.. 57 Sales — Land Valuation.. . ...: ....... ......1.,.14.,...., 5$ ■/CoomparisonApproach Land Comparables .. . ...•.. NN«.H ...N:HH.«:N.N: .....w.i • ..........Mt.:.. ....«.N...:. 58 AnalysisGrid... .....H.................Hu.Hrss:.::...................... ..•:ar.••HH. 64 Sales Comparison Approach C wqusion... .H..HH...... ...... ................. , 66 Final Reconciliation. ......................... ................ ...... ........ : b7 . .. Certification ..... . , ... ....,,::..........• ................. 68 Addenda. ...... .. ................................ ....:., . .... .. .............H.....«:. 69 Definitions...............................,....N..:.............. .....:.............................=..:.H.... 70 Professional Qualifications ..... .. ,.... .. ... ... ..... .. ...... ,.......... 73 Pnbperty Name Interest Appraised l:"94 Vacvt :05 73rd StrM Property M*r Type Current As Is Ma*et'Vahte Fee Simple: Address S14455,000 3005 73rd Suet _ City Vertu Bfta county ind ma Rbor . . state FL ZIP 32967. Tax ID 323"30000OW3 .o Ti 323,"2 .. - ` .1.i1 Jolat M, Luther, as Tittte afT�le V�i�an ltd. lir h�v�able Owmir Trust dated July 13, 2004 I&W SF Acres 35.99 W.3 gi�le_Farmly Residential DbUttltalc to 3 unwa )xg--1 ZoTy S -amity Residential Distra�Ct i9p to 1 t> ;Becl Parcel ID Gim Land Gross Land Usable Land Usable Land View Access Area (Acres) Area (Sq Ft) Area (Acres) An* (Sq Ft) 3239030000000300000L,0 24.99 1,088,564 17,54 764,042 Average Fair 32390200000SOM0401A 2.00 522,720 Poor _ .. Totals 36.99 1,611,U4 7 9$ 71i4,�V42, Ati!ct4ge Average The parcel has approximately 19.45 acres or SNo wetlands as indicated on the US. Fish and Wildlife National Wetlands Inventory Maps. It is unlikely development would occur in this area due to development restrictions and a future land use of C_2 Conservation,: allowing 1 unit per 40 acres. There are 17.54 acres of identified uplands zoned RS -3 .Single Family Residentiol District (up to 3: units per acre). This area appears that' it could support fuWe development. 1t4: Interest Appraised Effective Date Value Conclusion Current As Is Ma*et'Vahte Fee Simple: 619/20.5: .. S14455,000 Tuttle-Arm$eld-Woper Appraisal & Research, Inc: Limiting C-anditions wW Aswmptions 1. Acceptime of and/or use of this report constitutes acceptance of the **ww* limiting conditions and assumptions; mese can only be Modified by witter documents executed by both parties. 2. The values given in this appraisal report represent the opinion of the signers as to the values as of the dates specified herein. Values of real estate are affected by an enormous variety of forces and comps which will vary with future conditions, sometimes sharply within a short t1M Responsible ownership and competent management are assumed. 3. This appraisal report covers the premises herein described only. Neither the figures herein nor any analysis thereof, nor any unit values derived therefrom are to be construed as applicable to any other property, however solar the same may be. 4. It is assumed that the title to said premises is good;, that the legal description of dw premises is correct; that the improvements are entirely and correctly located on the property; but no investigation er survey has been made,;unless so stated. S. The value given in this appraisal report is gross, without consideration givft to =y encumbrance, restriction or question of title, unless so stated. 6. Information as to the description of the premises, restrictions, improvements and income features of the property involved in this, report is as has been submitted by the applicant for this appraisal or has been obtained by the signer hereto. All such information is considered to be correct; however, no responsibility is assumed as to the correctness thereof unless sat stated in the report. 7. Possession of any copy of this report does not carry with it the right of publication, nor may it be used, or relied upon, for any purpose by anyone other than the client without prior written authorization of the cent and identified as such herein, and in any event, only in its entirety. Parties who receive a copy of this report .as a consequence of disclosure requirements applio to our client do not bete a party to the appraiser -client relationship and do not become intended users of this report unless the parties were specifically identified as such by out bliMt at the°time of engagement for services. 8. Neither all nor part of the contents of this report shall be conveyed to the public through advertising, public relations, news, sales or other media, without the written consent of the author; particularly as to the valuation, polkalusions, the identity of the appraiser or the firm with which he is connected, or ony reference to the Appraisal Institute, or to the 3RA or MAI designations: 9. The appraiser herein, by reason of this report is tot required to gave testimony in court or attend hearings, with reference to the property hers appraised, unless arrangements have been previously made :More. 10.1 The Contract for the appraisal of said premises is fulfilled by the signer hereto upon the delivery of this report duly executed. Tu.Wc•Armfidd Wagner Appraisal & Research, Inc: 11. It is assumed that there is full compliance with all applicable federal, state, and local environmental regulations and zoning laws unless noncompliance is stated, defined and considered in the appraisal report. Necessary licenses, permits, consents, legislative or administrative authority from any local, state or Federal government or private entity are assumed to be in place or reasonably obtainable. 12. The appraiser assumes that there are no hidden or unapparent conditions of the property, subsoil, or structures, which would render it more or less valuable. The appraiser assumes no responsibility for such conditions, or for engineering which might be required to discover such factors. The appraiser does not consider mineral rights. 13. All data relating to land sales, improved property sales, and comparable rentals used in this report are considered to be proprietary; that is, owned by Tuttle-Armfield- Wagner. It is provided to the client for use within this report only. Any other use or distribution of this data without the prior written consent of Tuttle-Armfield-Wagner is specifically prohibited. 14. An environmental assessment was not provided for use in this assignment. No evidence of contamination was observed during our inspection, nor did we note the presence of commonly known toxic chemicals/hazardous materials. Nonetheless, we are not qualified to inspect/evaluate a site for potential hazards or contamination. Therefore, lacking contrary information, we assume that no contamination or environmental hazards exist that would adversely affect the subject utility and/or Cmarket value. Accordingly, the market value estimate contained herein is based on the accuracy of this assumption (subject to verification via a current environmental assessment as conducted by a duly qualified environmental scientist or engineer). 15. There are no proposed judgments or pending or threatened litigation that could affect the value of the property. 16. If the property is subject to one or more leases, any estimate of residual value contained in the appraisal may be particularly affected by significant changes in the condition of the economy, of the real estate industry, or of the appraised property at the time these leases expire or otherwise terminate. 17. No consideration has been given to personal property located on the premises or to the cost of moving or relocating such personal property; only the real property has been considered. 18. The current purchasing power of the dollar is the basis for the value stated in our appraisal; we have assumed that no extreme fluctuations in economic cycles will occur. 19. The value found herein is subject to these and to any other assumptions or conditions set forth in the body of this report but which may have been omitted from this list of C) Assumptions and Limiting Conditions. Tuttle-Annfield-Wagner Appraisal & Research, Inc. 20. Information, estimates and opinions are verified where possible, but cannot be guaranteed. Maps and plans provided are intended to assist the client in visualizing the property; no other use of these plans is intended or permitted. 21. Unless stated herein, the property is assumed to be outside of areas where flood hazard insurance is mandatory. Maps used by public and private agencies to determine these areas are limited with respect to accuracy. Due diligence has been exercised in interpreting these maps, but no responsibility is assumed for misinterpretation. 22. It is assumed there are no encroachments, easements or other restrictions which would affect the subject property, unless otherwise stated. 23. This appraisal is to be used only for the purpose stated herein. While distribution of this appraisal in its entirety is at the discretion of the client, individual sections shall not be distributed; this report is intended to be used in whole and not in part. 24. The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) became effective January 26, 1992. We have not made a specific survey or analysis of this property to determine whether the physical aspects of the improvements meet the ADA accessibility guidelines. In as much as compliance matches each owner's financial ability with the cost to cure the non -conforming physical characteristics of a property, we cannot comment on compliance to ADA. Given that compliance can change with each owner's financial ability to cure non -accessibility, the value of the subject does not consider possible non-compliance. Specific study of both the owner's financial ability and the cost to cure any deficiencies would be needed for the Department of Justice to determine compliance. Tuttle-Armfield-Wagner Appraisal & Research, Inc. Extraordinary Assumptions An assumption is a statement or condition which is presumed or assumed to be true and from which a conclusion can be drawn. An extraordinary assumption is an assumption which if found to be false could alter the resulting opinion or conclusion. We note that the use of the following Extraordinary Assumptions might have an effect on assignment results if later found out to be untrue or faulty. US Fish & Wildlife National Wetland Inventory Maps indicate the presence of 19.45 acres (52.6% of the parcel) of wetlands. We were not provided with any documentation by ownership regarding wetlands delineation and are not qualified to determine exactly how much of the site is wetlands and of what quality and type. However, we assume the information provided by the National Wetlands Inventory Map is accurate that the site, in its entirety, is considered wetlands. A current professional title search was not available for our use in this assignment. Therefore, we assume that no easements, encroachments, or deed restrictions exist which would adversely affect the subject utility and hence market value, other than as described herein. The parcel has approximately 19.45 acres or 53% wetlands as indicated on the U.S. Fish and Wildlife National Wetlands Inventory Maps. It is unlikely development would occur in this area due to development restrictions and a fixure land use of C-2 Conservation, allowing 1 unit per 40 acres. We assume that due to the future land use, this area would not contribute significantly to total allowable density over the entire combined tract. Tuttle-Armfield-Wagner Appraisal & Research, Inc. 4109 Identification of Su The subject consists of two adjacent parcels with a total of 3f "-Acres with frontage along 73rd Street in Vero Beach. The pared: has approximately 19.45 acres or 3% wetlands as indicated on the U.S. Fish and Wilms National Wetlands Inventory Maps. It us :ely development would occur in this area due to development restrictions and a A*n land use of C-2 Conservation, allowing l unit per 40 acres. There are 17.54 acres of identified uplands azoned RS -3 Single Family Residential District (up to 3 units per acre). This area appears that it could support future development. The property is not listed for sale nor under contract for purchase. The property is further identified as Indian River County Property Appraiser Marcel ID 32390300000003000001.0 and 323902000:00500000001.0 with Tax Account ID 42237 and 42226. Pd of the Appraisal At the request of the client, the purpose of this appraisal is to estimate the Current `As Is' Market Value of the subject property's Fee Simple estate effective June 9, 2025. The "Market Value" and "Fee Simple" interests are defined in the Addendum. Client This appraisal report has been prepared for Indian River County c/o Ms. Wendy Swindell, Assistant Director, Parks and Conservation, located at.1509 91h Street SW,.Vero Beach,: FL 32962. . Intended Usw and deer of App"ba'l Intended user .of the report is specifically identified as the client. Parties who receive a Oopy of this. report do not become a party to the appraiser -client relationship and do not become intended users of this report unless the parties were specifically identified as such: at the time of the engagement for services. Tuttle-Armfietd-Wager Appraisal & Rescan, Inc. Intended user of the report is specifically identified as the cliant< Partied who receive a oopy of this report do not become a party to the appraiser -client relationship and dna not become intended users of this report unless the parties were specifically identified as such at the time of the engagement for services. The client will rely upon this appraisal for b*rxWl use, including but not limited to, rendering a decision relative to purchase of all car a: portion of the property rights of the subject property. This report is not intended for any other use or user. No one outer than the named clientor any other party not identified as an intended user should use or rely on this appraisal for a®y purpose Such parties are advised to obtain an appraisal from an appraiser of their own choosing if they require an appraisal for. their Qwn use. Owner of Record and sales HlMft The Indian. River Coup :Property Appraiser's Record Card indicates currentoership is listed as John M. Luther, as Trustee of The William M. Luther Irrevocable Trust daw& July 13., 20114. The parcel has been under this ownership for an unrecorded ana aW of time per the Indian River County: Property Appraiser Office & Records. The only re led warranty deed occurred on July 30, 2004 as recorded in OR Book 17655 Page 1699 when the property transferred from William M Luther to the John i1il. Luther, as Trustee of the William M. Luther Irrevocable Trust Dated July 13, 2004. The subject is not listed for sale nor under contract for purchase. Eased on Information obtained from the client, various recognized published data sources and f or the county assessor's records, the subject property ownership history has no prior sales in the last three years. This information was verified with the Indian River County Property Appraiser records. We assume this information is I accurate as described by ownership and public r+ords, however, if further verification is required, we strongly suggest it be obtained via a current title search. Ex ng Leases, Rentals or Use Arseamts The subject parcel is a vacant land parcel. There are no leases or use agreements in place. Tutde-Atmfiield-Wagner, Appraisal & Research, Inc. Wetlands (Water & Air ResearChj"Ci— Environmental Stud 20 4) Aerial Eagle View Scope of Work According to the Uniform. Standards of Professional Appraisal X00, it is tho appraiser's responsibility to develop and report a scope of work that results in credilAt results that are appropriate for the appraisal problem and intended user. Therefore, the appraiser must identify and consider: • the client and intended users of the report as well as the intended use; • assignment conditions; • typical client expectations; and • typical appraisal work by peers for similar assignments. Problem ... . - The purpose dithe appraisal is to estimate the Current Market Value of the Fee Simple interest ofthe subject property on an'As Is'basis. I*emkd Use The chertt w� rely upon ft appraisal for i ftnW use, includiiilfg batt not limited to, r a mon relative to purchase ofall or a portion of1he property r#ft ofda subject property. Intended UseA*) I nwided user ofdw report is gmifrcally identied as the Amit. Parties mho receive a copy ofi is report do not becotne a party to the appraiser-client relationship and do not become intended users of this report unless the parties were specifically identified as such at the time of the engagement for services. Araisal Based on the intended users *e di gofttlesubiwfs physical, econon* and leVl characteristics, and the intended use offt an'app!!sal rqpW 101W was used. This is an Appraisal Report as defined byUz*= Stars 8* ofPwfessiona] Appraisa ,Practice under Standards Rule 2-2(a), it presents a discussion ,of the data, v and analyses that were used in the appraisal process to develop the opinion of vain. Additiowl suppo documentation concerning the data, reasoning; and analyses is retained in our file. . WWI Property Identification The subject has been identified by the assessors' parcel nunibir, legal description, and addres Is this a 'Land Only' appraisal? yes _.__.... Inspection An inspection of the subject property has been made, with photographs.: Zoning A review of zoning and applicable land use controls has been made. Market Analysis The subject marketing area and surrounding neighborhoods within the county were examined in order to determine factors that significantly affect the subject property. Local land use policies, community support facilities, traffic patterns, demographics, and development trends were considered. A summary of the most pertinent details is presented. Highest and Best Use Analysis An "As Vacant" and "As Improved" H&BU analis liar the subject has been rrde. Physically possible, legally permissible and financially feasible uses were considered, and the most reasonably probable and maximally productive use was concluded. Information Sources The appraiser maintains a comprehensive database for this market area and has reviewed the market for sales, rentals and listings relevant to this analysis. In addition, market data acquired in the course of previous appraisal work is retained in the appraiser's work files. Other sources include, but are not limited to the following: Multiple Listing Services, public records, interviews with brokers, buyers, and sellers, appraisal files, published articles and surveys. Information pertaining to this data was verified by one or more parties involved with, or having reliable knowledge of each individual transaction when possible. Information Not Available We had sufficient information to conclude a reliable value comb, siDn Comments The employed methods and level of analysis provides a credible value conclusion for the subject property. Competency Comment The person(s) signing this report are licensed to appraise real property in the state the subject is located. They affirm they have the experience, knowledge, and education to value this type property. They have previously appraised similar real estate. 1 Regional Perspective gner Appraisal & Kesearch, Inc. all Neighborhood Analysis Location and General Data The property is in the central portion of Indian Iiver County,. Indian Rim County is located on the coast of east-central Florida. Indimn River County is about a 1.5 hour`s. drive south of the Kennedy Space Center and 1-1/1 hours due southeast of MOW World. It is just south of the midpoint between Miami sad Jacksonville. Indian River County is one of the top 100 wealthiest counties in the country. Indian River County has five incorporated municipalities and ten census -designated unincorporated neighborhoods. The 2020 Bureau of Economic and Business Research of the University of Florida estimated that approximately 95% of the population resides. in unincorporated districts. This is followed by 16% in Sebastian (the most populous city) and 11% in Vero Beach, with the balance in Fellsmere, Indian River shores, and Orchid. Because of its location: Sebastian, 'aero Beach, and unincorporated area market influences affect the subject property. There are five municipal jurisdictions within the Gausty: Fellsmere, Sebastian, Vero Beach, Indian River Shores, and Orchid. The eastern third of the County lies between the Atlantic Ocean to the east and Interstate 145 to the west. The western two-thirds of the County is primarily agricultural. or conservation mid. The Urban Service Area (where municipal utilities are available) is generally east -oft: -95 except for the city of Fellsmere, which is mostly west of I95. In Indian Buyer County, the historic pace of development has been moderate, slightly above Florida's growth rate but slightly below the average growth rate in the Treasure Coast mom. The subject is located northeast of Wabasso Causeway bridge that connects the mainland to the barrier islands to the east and form the subject's southern neighborhood boundary. North of the subject is the city of Sebastian and the Sebastian River that forms the border between Indian River and Brevard Counties. To the east the neighborhood extends to the Indian River. To the west the neighborhood is bounded by Interstate 95. The subject's immediate area is mostly residential development, While much of the population for Indian River County is concentrated along the Indian River, the county's western portion is heavily influenced by agricultural land. As a result, there is a noticeable transition of housing and population density extending from east to west. To the east of I-95, there is a high agricultural and residential land concentration with small pockets of industrial zoned land. The subject lies within one of these small popkets. The majority of industrital land in this area is primarily owned by Indian Ria qty Solid Waste Disposal and the Indian River Industrial Eco -District Campus, Oslo Park, n Light Industrial District, is another small industrial area just outside the eighborhood boundary to the south. This industrial district is fully developed. Overalls the subject's immediate area is dominated by agricultural residential land uses with few available areas that permit industrial development. 1 The Indian River County Landfill, is another industrial area, and is dependent upon special district status known as the Indian River County Solid Waste Disposal District (S.W.D.D.). This landfill is a Class I landfill that operates as a co-disposal of municipal solid waste, construction & demolition debris, recyclable materials, and household hazardous material. Republic Services contractually operates and maintains the landfill. To the west of I-95, agricultural land and two large conservation areas dominate land use. The Blue Cypress Conservation Area is a 61,000-acre conservation area located north of S.R. 60. Fort Drum Marsh Conservation Area is south of S.R. 60 and has nearly 21,000 acres. These conservation areas are part of the Upper St. Johns River Basin Project implemented by the district and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. Also, to the west of I-95 there is a 955-acre solar panel farm. This ground-mounted solar farm project, known as Pelican Solar Energy Center, was constructed and is managed by FPL. FPL is an electric company that generates, transmits, distributes, and sells electricity to Indian River County and other surrounding counties. The construction of this solar farm started in 2020 and entered into commercial operation in March 2021. The project cost $110,761,000 to construct and supplies enough energy to power 15,000 households Commercial Development The closest build-up of shopping facilities is northwest of the subject at the intersection of Barber St. and US Highway 1. This is a modest commercial area anchored by Publix, Walgreens, Truist Bank, and Bamboo Court Chinese Restaurant. The majority of commercial improvements are located along US 1 and include various shopping plazas, strip centers, office buildings, banking facilities, restaurants, and numerous other commercial properties. Current neighborhood uses consist primarily of multi and single -family development. There are commercial and retail sectors across the more general landscape with a few offices and industrial business parks. At the northwest corner of Barber Street, is the Indian River Shopping Plaza. Publix is the primary anchor store, with a Truist Bank occupying an outparcel. Additionally, there is a Walgreens located on the southwest corner. This location is within three miles of the subject property. At the intersection of S. Highway I and 9th Street SW. There is a heavy concentration of national car dealerships such as Nissan, Kia, and Jeep/Dodge. Also located at this intersection is South Vero Squared a 147,417 square foot neighborhood retail center anchored by a Publix grocery store and includes several major fast-food chains on out parcels, such as Wendy's and McDonald's. Along S.R. 60, west of 58th Avenue is the Indian River Mall, a larger regional mall. There are four anchor ,stores and two smaller shopping centers. This location is within sa c miles of the subject property. The mall was .completed in late 1995. A 24 screen AMC theater has since been added. Anchor stores include JC Penny's, Dillard's, and Macy's. Target and Lowe's anchor the two adjoining shopping centers. Ryanwood Shopping Center is at the northeast corner of State Road 60 and 58th Avenue. This shopping center contains a Publix grocery store and Books a Million, as i1w3or tenants, along with Bank of America and Burger King, on out parcels. Development at the corner of State Remi 60.:and 58th Avenue includes a Walgreens, a Sam's Club, and a Walmart Superstore. The southwest corner of this:intersection includes Home Depot and a CV8 Digs, McDoonalds, and Ruby Tuesday on out -parcels. A new Chipotle Grill was constructed in 2013 adjacent to. McDonald's. Indian River Community College and Indian River Charter FrOSchoolare.lamted southwest of Home Depot. , Inc. Institutional and Recreational Development The defined area also includes a number of public and private support facilities. Public and private schools are also represented in the defined area. The Indian River State College campus is situated south of S.R. 60, and west of 58th Avenue on College Lane. Indian River State College offers undergraduate and post -graduate programs in a variety of subjects. Pelican Island Elementary School is located just north of the subject along Schumann Drive. Additionally, three additional large public schools (Treasure Coast Elementary School, Sebastian River Middle School and Sebastian River High School) are located west of the subject. Recreation facilities located within close proximity to the subject include the West Wabasso Park (County owned) and Johns Island Club West Golf Course (privately owned). Additionally, RedStick Golf Cluh is located southeast of the subject. In addition to the larger recreational facilities, several commercial recreational facilities are located in the area, including the Safari Golf and Games on 9th Street SW and Skate Factory on 27th Avenue SW. We conclude the subject market area is well served by public and private institutional and recreational facilities. The Vero Beach Municipal Airport, and related airport development, is located within ten miles of the subject to the south The airport was a naval air base in World War II. After the war, the base was turned over to the City of Vero Beach. In recent years it has been considerably upgraded with an FAA air traffic control tower, three runways, airfield lighting, and other amenities. Piper Aircraft is headquartered at Vero Beach for their research and development center, which was also built on part of the grounds of the former naval air station. Piper has not recently released its employment figures, although recent figures showed the company employing more than 1,000 at its Vero Beach facility. The Vero Beach Municipal Airport building was recently renovated and expanded at the cost of approximately $6.5 million. About 65 percent of the cost, or $4.2 million, was provided by state grants. The remainder came from money raised at the airport that goes into a special airport fund. No locally derived property tax money was used. The Vero Beach Regional Airport building expansion was from 11,000 square feet to more than 22,000 square feet and includes six offices (with one able to be subdivided) ranging from 300 to 1,200 square feet plus open areas that can be used for car rental or charter air services. New landscaping and an exterior memorial courtyard detailing the airport's history, including a plaque listing people who died during training at the former World War II Naval Air Station, were completed. A lobby area has televisions and wireless internet connection for people waiting for planes or viewing airplanes coming and going. C.J. Cannon's restaurant within the terminal building expanded from 3,878 to 7,475 square feet, including a new banquet facility and Internet cafe area outside the main restaurant. In addition to being a center for aviation, Vero Beach Municipal Airport is a center for commercial and industrial development and is home to over 100 non -aviation businesses. Medical Development The subject is located approximately 9 miles north of the Cleveland Clinic Indian River Hospital, a 332 -bed, not-for-profit hospital offering comprehensive medical services to the Treasure Coast community. The Welsh Heart Center, Scully -Welsh Cancer Center, and Scully Endoscopy Center offer full-service programs and a multidisciplinary approach. Healthcare professionals represent specialties including orthopedic services, minimally invasive vascular surgery, neurosurgery, stroke services, robotic surgery, a state-of-the-art wound healing center, bariatric surgery, and the only maternity wing in the community. The hospital features all private rooms and is the largest private -sector employer in Indian River County. In Sebastian, north of the subject, the Sebastian River Medical Center is located in the Roseland area. This privately -owned hospital serves northern Indian River County and southern Brevard County. The Sebastian River Medical Center is the primary care provider for the northern Indian River County area and has become a powerful magnet for neighborhood medical office/services growth. In addition, the hospital underwent a $25 million expansion that included a new three-story tower. The first floor has a 16 -bed intensive care unit, while the second and third floors feature 42 additional private patient suites. However, after this expansion, they have embarked on an even more extensive $65 million expansion set to provide another 48 private patient rooms. The 90,000square-foot Cexpansion was announced in January 2016 by former owner Community Health Systems Inc. and was expected to be completed in 2018. But the acquisition of Sebastian River Medical Center by Steward in May 2017 changed the construction timeline. The most recent expansion was completed in June of 2020. Recently, The 2022 report of Best -Performing cities was released. Sebastian -Vero Beach had been ranked in the top 10 out of 201 US metros, rising from #9 in 2020 to #8 in 2021. However, the 2022 report saw a slight slide down 11 places to being ranked in the top 20 at #19. These top-ranking small cities see driving growth from retiree communities, tourism, medical services, and construction sectors. Sebastian -Vero beaches are tourist destinations and a hub for medical services. These two sectors are the key factors in driving growth, with manufacturing being a core economic driver. Appraisal & Research, Inc. Below, is the top 1:0 highlight from the Milken Institute Report: 3. i consistently growrk irj I tod 20th in � ` . ggovrtlt also rem ' stNdy^-increart 1.'tttt from 2018-19 (45th) and 13.8 percent from 2014-19 )16th}-Rtawth in health care, professional and btO#* Mlt *V1bes, and construction jobL!* The tn�s$al aria( The median age in 20.5 years old nat 100, VW #400 tiles." The lar a44•19's dihste effect on the 601110y, these twin factors will complicate economic recovery. Apart from the service sector and consumption via* the regional economy also includealltio high- OKWkiflons (74th): commertWeaJoervice iRCery manufacturing (qrj dj and manufactutirtg * such, alC the top quarter of all small cities for hkjocentration (50th). Future economic dev ity should emphasise preparation fiat at industries with strong potential, l,>1Wral and engineering services mai medical at4dpstic laboratories 011* 6t . According to an article published by Sebastian Daily on May 7, 2019, Sebastian ranked second, just under Naples, Florida, for booming sordhan economies. Below is an excerpt from the article of the tap 5: "Sebastian was ranked number 2 on the list of south cities where business is booming, and salaries are rising, according to CNBC: To rank the top "boomtowns," or cities that meet the criteria, the study look>od at five-year data on population, housing, GOP and per capita inclme from the U.S. Census Bureau's 2017American C ommimity and the Bureau of Economic: Analysis. eld-Wagner Appraisal & Research, Inc. I Joh OWfh ... tam ....ilii Job growth (20*0 :UW 4" MfaIM�A�b-397 Edi 19th �erthgatj4i>AoWlh(30l2019 tOJ202f11 40th flah-techGOPSrowth(2014-19) 10.716 85th Kqh-teChGDPgrowth (2018-19) 42nd W~ GDPmga on (2019) W.0.62 50th NW*WofhWtft*hwk& a (2019) 2 74th tixWkAdswftbW *WW*Oom(2019) iwtl* 108th FtousetwroGhwitA I khoft-Sts(2014-18) XsW 236th *W8hPM with a*Nfi i housiw costs (2019) ' 2nd i;;;jigiR*Whbh4O6 strectalizations.with two lhRast�eauat fuaaeiliw/tuMinse 3. i consistently growrk irj I tod 20th in � ` . ggovrtlt also rem ' stNdy^-increart 1.'tttt from 2018-19 (45th) and 13.8 percent from 2014-19 )16th}-Rtawth in health care, professional and btO#* Mlt *V1bes, and construction jobL!* The tn�s$al aria( The median age in 20.5 years old nat 100, VW #400 tiles." The lar a44•19's dihste effect on the 601110y, these twin factors will complicate economic recovery. Apart from the service sector and consumption via* the regional economy also includealltio high- OKWkiflons (74th): commertWeaJoervice iRCery manufacturing (qrj dj and manufactutirtg * such, alC the top quarter of all small cities for hkjocentration (50th). Future economic dev ity should emphasise preparation fiat at industries with strong potential, l,>1Wral and engineering services mai medical at4dpstic laboratories 011* 6t . According to an article published by Sebastian Daily on May 7, 2019, Sebastian ranked second, just under Naples, Florida, for booming sordhan economies. Below is an excerpt from the article of the tap 5: "Sebastian was ranked number 2 on the list of south cities where business is booming, and salaries are rising, according to CNBC: To rank the top "boomtowns," or cities that meet the criteria, the study look>od at five-year data on population, housing, GOP and per capita inclme from the U.S. Census Bureau's 2017American C ommimity and the Bureau of Economic: Analysis. eld-Wagner Appraisal & Research, Inc. The Top 9 Southern Cities: C1. Naples, Florida Personal income growth, 2012 to 2017: 22.8% Population growth, 2012 to 2017: 6.8% GDP increase, 2012 to 2017: 34% 2. Sebastian, Florida Personal income growth, 2012 to 2017: 20.9% Population growth, 2012 to 2017: 9.3% GDP increase, 2012 to 2017: 23.5% 3. Fayetteville, Arkansas Personal income growth, 2012 to 2017: 23.4% Population growth, 2012 to 2017: 10.4% GDP increase, 2012 to 2017: 37.6% 4. Raleigh, North Carolina Personal income growth, 2012 to 2017: 15% Population growth, 2012 to 2017: 11% GDP increase, 2012 to 2017: 33% 5. Miami, Florida Personal income growth, 2012 to 2017: 17.7% Population growth, 2012 to 2017: 10.2% GDP increase, 2012 to 2017: 29.4%... The report says the Top 9 cities are good alternatives for people who want to avoid notoriously expensive cities, such as New York or San Francisco, because they "offer incentives, such as a more affordable cost -of -living or a higher paycheck — or both," GOBankingRates reports. Nationally, Sebastian ranks number 3 on the list. Sebastian ranks in the top 10 for the highest percentage increase in population, with a five-year population change of 2,042. It also ranks in the top 10 for the highest percentage increase in income due to its five-year wage increase of $12,647". Neighborhood Residential Development Residential development within the area had experienced a steady growth rate. Demand for this area had historically been for retirement housing along the Indian River Lagoon and US One with a family housing orientation in the areas west of US One. Pelican Point, River Run and Reflections on the River are three riverfront condo projects developed in the Iate 1980's to early 1990's. Two newer riverfront condo projects were completed in 2007. These projects are located on the west side of Indian River Drive in the north portion of the neighborhood. The northern most project is located about 1/4 mile south of Roseland Road and is known as The Inlet at Sebastian. Farther south, about 1/4 mile south of Davis Street, Sebastian Riverfront Condo Resort has been developed. Much like the rest of the Florida market, Sebastian/north Indian River County has strengthened over the last few years; the most dominate current interest in residential housing is for single family home development in platted subdivisions. Graves Brothers Companies, a citrus grower located in the unincorporated area of Indian River County, had requested voluntary annexation of 1,110 -acres on County Road 510, a plan that eventually could bring more than 3,500 more homes to Sebastian. However, due to a judge's rejection of the annexation, the ruling would need to be appealed. The panel of judges ruled the annexation null and void due to improper notification. Statistics developed by the REALTORS® Association of Indian River County through its Multiple Listing Service and in conjunction with Florida REALTORS® reflect the following for Historic Sales Price Trend through February 2025 in Indian River County. As illustrated in the following chart, the median sale price has increased overall from 2019 through 2023. Indian River Cowty.HoWngMarket:'1Wds K`iW 4i ihellotnlri� �tiirt ilisbtadlunRtaer CuunWloCiy? h)iOW"Y2OZ&tW4Vitivfrlotaf"""OSIS400KDAawcop-bares tila$znsivo Cocci) W*IhWlofi :7YsMtMmrtudw+tta� 6fi-2&r%ImIIpar,T"v hci7?fwiu+iwWbtTr'.isawyt}+stGnu0r&OIO-u1)vm. 1tMMsSiY MTbv �t) N:tivr•, 5c#'! {,'uunOs� i»tti-Aet $404.000 Z7'2 i0S lFT: ': tl•..].:::U �fh :.i.i7 :; �-.M.z[S.: • It'::C � )l�.YClT }..(Qif .AAWmRTytl4. lyra 3yt-us SOW'S er Appraisal & Research. Inc. Indian River QqM Residential Market Activity A quick recap of the Sebastian -Vero Beach Residential Report for MMM -1 EMRMI JA: fol t &T UOSID SALES UP 273 "N W N ,Tom W a $386,190 fm MEDIAN SALE PRICE DOLLAR VOLUME RE, PIRO Million While still undoubtedly a sollm' market, this data suggests a softening of the residential real estate market. This change is likely due to macroeconomic headwinds related, to near -record -high inflation rates, increases in borrowing, costs, and looming fears of recession. Though the real estate market on a national level has clearly shifted, it is still unclear what impact softening macroeconomic Wicators, will have on the'MSA, given the high levels of immigration that continues to bolster local demand for residential real estate. Appraiser's Note. Directly adjacent and easilsouth of tke subject, GHQ Hommock Shores is under site plan approval for the development of 'a 103-104 single family subdivision. The total combined acreage of the site consist of 60.68-acm, arcn. inc. ACTIVE INVENTORY 1,294 lot" -";� . ........ DOLLAR VOLUME RE, PIRO Million While still undoubtedly a sollm' market, this data suggests a softening of the residential real estate market. This change is likely due to macroeconomic headwinds related, to near -record -high inflation rates, increases in borrowing, costs, and looming fears of recession. Though the real estate market on a national level has clearly shifted, it is still unclear what impact softening macroeconomic Wicators, will have on the'MSA, given the high levels of immigration that continues to bolster local demand for residential real estate. Appraiser's Note. Directly adjacent and easilsouth of tke subject, GHQ Hommock Shores is under site plan approval for the development of 'a 103-104 single family subdivision. The total combined acreage of the site consist of 60.68-acm, arcn. inc. Traffic Count Map A traffic count map is illustrated below. In the subjW's immediate area, traffic along the western boundary of the subject property ;along U,S; Highway 1 in the immediate area has traffic levels tracked at 24,500 vehicles per day. 53'd Avenue does not have traffic tracked as this is a rural residential redway. Accan and UnkaW U.S. Highway One is a north/south connector that extends throughout Indian River and Indian River Counties, generally running parallel to the western shoreline of the Indian River. U.S. One is the primary connector between Vero Beach and retail/employment centers to the south and to the north to the cities of Palm Bay and Melbourne. Interstate 95 (145) is the main highway on the East Coast of the United States, paralleling the Atlantic Ocean from Maine to Florida. It is the longest. nooh-sooth. Interstate highway, and it passes through more states - fifteen - than any other Interstate. In Indian River County, there are two in lurnges# �.R, 512 and 3.R. 60 in Vero J13=, h. The State Road 60 corridor (20th Street) is located south of the subject property, This road predominantly characterizes an office cridur between downtown and 43x4 Avenue, although the uses shift to becoming characterized by major retail beyond 43rd. Avenue to the west. This corridor has experienced good real estate activity over the P*" two years, including multiple vacant land purchases, multiple improved ptapr.. purchases, and renovation projects. U.S. One, through the Cities of Sebastian, R+aseland, and Veit Beach, has been upgraded with new turning lanes, landscaped medians, and a bike path. While the road was not widened, the project improved storm water drainage and ttaf is flow. Traffic signals am located at major intersections. Tu ner Appraisal & Research. Inc. Access to the subject neighborhood is via 95th St., which intersects with US Highway 1 C approximately '/4 mile to the west. 95th Street is an east -west residential road that connects and terminates at S. Highway 1 to the west. Interstate 95 access requires travel to S.R. 512 to the north or S.R. 60 to the south. The relative centralization of the subject with respect to Interstate 95 points of access results in Below Average marks for Interstate Accessibility. The subject has frontage along its eastern boundary with 53rd Avenue, a county - maintained roadway, however, the paved portion terminates near the southeastern corner of the property. C. A survey of the property was requested, but not provided. For site information we used the information on the IRCPAO record card. It indicates that the subject does not have direct frontage 95th Street nor 53`d Ave. as it appears there are areas of wetlands and culverts on the northern and eastern elevations. We assume this information is accurate. , Inc. Demographics For demographic data, we have included a. analysis of the neighbo&ood Provided by ESRI, the endorsed GIS firm utilized by both the Appraisal Institute and. CCiM members. This data, incorporates information reported by U.S. Bureau of the Census, 2000 Census of Papulation and Dousing. ESR1 then makes credible forecasts for 2020 and 2025, ESDI converted 1990 Census data into 2000 geography. Oue to the geographical factors presented by the Indian River Lagoon, the most approve shy+ areas are 5, 10, and 15 mute drive times. Population and income infamation for the five, ten and fifteen -minute drive times are shown on the following tables. All three study areas have slight increases forecast for population levels. The fifteen -minute drive time area has the greatest income levels. i mr-I end-Vvagner A. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . i mr-I end-Vvagner Summary and Conclusion The subject is located in Sebastian and is served by the major artery of U.S. Highway 1. The defined area is approximately 50% developed and appears to be stable regarding the single-family residential development. There are no adverse neighborhood conditions known to exist (nor were any observed) that would preclude or severely limit the subject's utilization according to its highest and best use as estimated herein. In comparison to other areas in the region, the market area is rated as follows: MARKET AREA ATTRIBUTE RATINGS Highway Access Average Demand Generators Average Convenience to other supporting land uses Average Convenience to Public Transportation Below Average Employment Stability Average Police and Fire Protection Average General Appearance of Properties Average Appeal to Market Average Stable for Commercial PricesNalue Trend Stable for Residential Stable for Industrial ner Appraisal & Research, Inc. :)w are not intended to represent all applicable aspects of the ordinance. They do provide the reader with ;al parameters. /a�nin� �unuua�� most consistent use of the subject property would be for single-family residential use as seen in the A fir the western parcellboundary of the subject property. The eastern portion is 100% wetlands with mrvat on and an ideal candidate for adoption into a county conservation/preservation system. 1C eastern portion with C-2 Future land use would not significandy cbibute to density. oraisal & Research, Inc. ;3 434 Indian River County Indian River County Residential Residential RS -3 RS -1 RS -3 Singje-Family Residential District to 3 units/acre) RS- I Single -Family Residential District (up to I unit/acre) The single-family districts are established to implement the policies of The single-family districts are established to implement the policies of the the Indian River County Comprehensive Plan for managing land Indian River County Comprehensive Plan for managing land designated for designated for residential uses, providing single -firmly housing residential uses, providing single-ftunily housing opportunities, and ensuring opportunities, and ensuring adequate public facilities to meet the adequate public facilities to meet the needs of residents. These districts are needs of residents. These districts are also intended to implement the also intended to implement the county's housing policies by providing county's housing policies by providing opportunities for a varied and opportunities for a varied and diverse housing supply. diverse housing supply. Permitted uses include but are not limited to: single-family dwellings, Permitted uses include but are not limited to: Single -Family Dwelling Foster foster care factties, amateur radio communication towers (less than Care Facilities, Communications Towers (non -wireless facilities including 80 ft.). commercial communications towers camouflaged up to 70 ft. Wand radio broadcast towers) less than 80 feet in height, Camouflaged G'emmercial radio towers up to 70 feet. L-2 (G Units Per Acre) C-2 (Conservation -X I Unit per 40 . 30% 25% 12.000 SF Oqe 80 ft. I 25 ft. 25 $ . 15 it. 15 IL 2s ft. 25 IL ft. 35 ft. sidentiat two(2) space per dwelling unit Residential 2) spaces per dwelling unit s To our knowledge, there are no land use regulations other than zoning that would acct the property. Further, there is no moratorium on development. We were provided no information by ownership that the subject site possesses any Entitlements which would affect the subject site. We assume that the subject does not have Entitlements in place which would sigrniflc affect the value. most consistent use of the subject property would be for single-family residential use as seen in the A fir the western parcellboundary of the subject property. The eastern portion is 100% wetlands with mrvat on and an ideal candidate for adoption into a county conservation/preservation system. 1C eastern portion with C-2 Future land use would not significandy cbibute to density. oraisal & Research, Inc. ;3 434 1 here are approximately 17.54 acres of uplands and 19.45 acrft of wetlands. Future Land Use Map ner Appraisal & Research, Inc. .... awxY,arr �'^.tif x��sysaa,.iK.n��l e! .C�fH S�xmdsar. .. 1 here are approximately 17.54 acres of uplands and 19.45 acrft of wetlands. Future Land Use Map ner Appraisal & Research, Inc. Assessment O14 -Was: Millage Tax Rate Ad Valorem Taxes Non Ad Valorem Taxes Total Parcel Taxes 323903000000030QQQQ I,Q $490,085 1 l,Q i2„ - i =1 3 3 w.. W0. , _ .. . 323903�i00605000000 LO s xi 14 osis ss: woo .sa ram ss 144444 The tax year runs from January 1 st to December- 31st: Real estate taxes in Indian River County are paid one year in arrears (2023 taxes are paid Mi 2026), and are due and, payable November 1 st of each year -or as soon thereafter as the certified tax l is received by the Tax Collector from the Property Appraiser. Properties in Indian River County are assessed Ad Valorem Taxes and Non -Ad Valorem Taxes. Ad valorem taxes, or real property taxes, are based on the value of such property; Non -ad valorem assessments are NOT based on value but are set amounts. The Non -Ad Valormn Takes the subject is responsible for goes toward solid waste disposal and emergency medical. services. According, to, Florida low, assessments are to be at `Full Just Value, 7US U= is generally held to be 100% MadW Value, less reasonable costs of .sales. It has been out experience, however, that assessments vary widely in relation to market value as defined in this report. Reassessments are annual based on a calendar year. $S,Ooo z. Assessed Total % $4000 Year Assessment Taffies Chow, $3,000 20211X307,$62 $4,54+12 ago 2021 $307rM $4,475 2022. $345,11 �.� .14,629 3.4%. 2023 $371„901 $4,993 7.6"/ _._. 2024 .._._ $520,fiSS $6,154...:.23.$% Sat1r 4' ladran bier coliq Property Description The following description is based on our property inspector public records, and a survey. Parcel ID lases... Location - 'TiICtaB(jl:Ctlle9spti{ lid Wat3005 731*- , sow Vet1i 1 kI V4 329011 Land Ilsepj Map Latitude $7.725464 Map Longitude .80.414922 -80.414922 Adjacent Land Uses Adjacent lard uses are primarily ural residential and vacant land uses. North ofthe subject are single -fainly lesilential developments and vacant land tracts. South ofthe subject are vacant lard tracts. West ofthe subject is vacant land tracts and single -fan*, residential developments. East ofthe subject iv ft, Indian River Lagoon Site Analysis & Comnents Site uta is Poor. The subject has adequate site, shape, access, utilities, and topography for low- itensi[ , residential use. Considering neighborhood trends and physical features, the subject site is suited for low - intensity residential use. It stands within the flood -prone area. Insurance purchases recommended. 3005 73rd Street Eastern Elevation Totals Gross Land Area (Sq Ft) 1,088,564 .522,720 1,611,284 Gross Land Area (Acres) ".99 12;00 36.99 Usable Land Area (Sq Ft) 704,042 764,042 Usable Land Area (Acres) 17.54 17,54 Excess Land Area Comments There is no indicated excess lard. The subject Floor Area Ratio (FAR) meets or exceeds current budding trends for this property W. Usable Land Area Comments According to US Fish & Wildlife National Wetlands Inventory raps, the site contains approxvnately 19.45 acres ofjurisdictional wetlands as defined to Florida Statutes 373.019 (19 — Surface Waters) and (25 — Wetlands). Additionally, an environmental study from 2024 conducted by the Water & Air Research, Inc, further confined the presence of wedands on the subject site. The estimates from this stu* titm 10.45 acres of Mangrove Swamp. Source for Site Size Property appraiser record card. Site Sim Analysis The total subject land area is typical for a residential rise in the subject neighborhood. Appraiser's Note: We were not provided a survey by current property ownership. The subject tract size was derived from the Indian River County Property Appraiser Records. The Environmental Study by Water & Air Research, Inc. indicates 35.7 total acres. At the client's request, in lite absence of a current survey, we have utilized the acreage provided by the property appraiser records. Appraiser's Note: An environmental study conducted in 2024 by Water & Air Research, Inc., confirmed that the subject site has approximately 53% wetland coverage. Wetland Map — U.S. Department of Fish & Wildlife Services, National Wetland Inventory Wetlands Area as identified by Water & Air Research, Inc. as part of an Environmental Study in 2024 mfield-Wagner Appraisal & Research, Inc. JURISDY01014AL WETLA"S L ACUSS)<ON Jurisdictional wetlands are considered environmentally sensitive and are protected from development by Florida Law (Chapter 403, Florida Statutes) which identified these areas as surface water resources. Because of the size and presence of these wetlands, the subject property falls under the jurisdiction of several regulatory agencies. These would include, but are not limited to, the St. Johns River Water Management District (SJRWMD), the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP), and Indian River County Department of Natural Resources. Jurisdictional wetlands are generally unsuitable for development without rather extensive site work, including filling and mitigation. Filling wetland areas is permitted by the State of Florida as an exception to this law; however, it must be demonstrated that there will be no significant environmental damages or any environmental impacts must be mitigated by creating or improving off -setting wetlands. Permits to "dredge and fill are issued on a very limited, case-by-case basis and are typically limited to `filling a very small percentage of low land included in a development intended for adjacent upland areas. These permits are issued on the basis of the assessment of the environmental impact and the probability of obtaining such permits for a parcel are related to the specific intentions of a given development proposal. Mitigating wetlands is also possible, but comes at significant cost. It can be accomplished several ways, but all are more costly than simply buying non -affected light industrial land. Thus, development of marsh areas is subject to a myriad of state, federal and local regulations. Further the high level of restrictions, if possible, would incur such substantial development expense as to preclude development feasibility of the subject light industrial land. The vast majority of knowledgeable market participants would not place value on jurisdictional wetlands because they could not significantly be incorporated into a development plan. Depending upon the location of the wetlands, they could also incur additional discount to the remaining subject land if it would increase development costs to work around them or if they create inefficient upland zones isolate upland areas). , Inc. 3 subject's Public Electricity N=rby -:Above GgM4d? Linsa Water Supply Type Npat - F7t * ii 4W Sewer Type WE" - Cbmtty §1 emir Rall Access No Dtnratsim Tuttle-Armfield-Wagner Inc .. • •. 9455 53rd Ave. _Totals Land Uots 7 1 2 Lard Uink Type qt Lot Connor Lot isnot is not Dtnratsim veils Varies Ptitnry Frontage Street Name 173rd Street None Frontage - Primary Street (Feet) 425 Average Depth (Feet) Varies Varies View Average Average View Description The primary frontatage is along 73rd St. This she does not have direct road access. Access Fair Average Access Description The subject has access via a dirt access road extensiottaf.7be subject is vacant land and does not have 73rd Street. direct access to the site. Site Visibility Poor Poor Site Vsbdity Description The she has no traffic tracked which is typical for a The site has no traffic tracked which is typical lou residential use. a residential use. She Improvements The subject is vacant land and does not have any site The subject is vacant land and does not have any improvements. site improvements. Off -Site Improvements The offsite improvements consist largely of the improved The off -she xnprovements consist largely ofthe roadways and municipal utilities. mlproved roadways and municipal utilities. _ _ Street Lightiail; There is m street lighting along 73rd Street. No Street Access Sidewalks There are no sidewalks along 73rd Street along. the N/A subject boundary. Cub and Gutter There are no cubs or gutters along 73rd Street along the N/A subject boundary. Dramag Appears Adequate Appears Adequate Topography Mined Mbod $drape Nighty Irregular The she is irregularly shaped $�Condidoms The appraiser assumes that there are no hidden or wnapparenteonditionapf .property, subsoil, or structures, which would render it more or less valuable. The appraiser assumes no responsibility for such conditions, or for engineering which night he required to discover such iictors. The appraiser does not consider mineral rights. Tuttle-Armfield-Wagner Inc .. • •. FEMA Map ;; D FEW Map Date 1t . Fbod Zone AB BYPbod Plast , 1riiDQd Zone Commits The subject entireh lies within Flood Zone AE, and idertifed as an area ofHgh Flood Risk. Flood Zone AE is defy ed as an area mandated by 100 -year flooding for which base flood elevations have been determined. EaGrnbranee / Easement Description We were rot provided a cutters survey or title policy ofthe subject property. We assure that no easements, en unbrances, and or deed restrictions exist that adverseh affect subject utility or market value. Accordingly, the market value estirmted herein is contingent on the accuracy ofthis assumption. Please reference Uniting Condkioma Aad Assuniptions. Emirom nental Issues Estuarine & Marine Wedard/Estuarine & Marine Deepwater Encroachrrents No encroachments onto the subject property were rated by i spection or storey. We assure there arena encroachments cOM the subject site. Wetlands Type Meted Wetland ;Redwoods Wetland Acres "A5 Wetlands and Watershed Comments The sue is affected by approxeately 4.8 acres ofju isdictional wetlands. Considering tholimftsary costs required to nmiptte wetlands, the market tends to avoid development irnpactmg these areilm lbs net useable area is reduced bydwswomn ofwetlands. Retention None Possible Nuisance No nuisances were observed upon inspection of the subject property. Aerial Eagle View Subject Photographs IF uttle-Armfield-Wagner Appraisal & Research, Inc. 41 '-hest and 9W Use Before an opinion of value can be developed, the: higiFieat and best use of the property must be determined for both the subject site as though vacant, and for the property as improved. Highest and best use may be defined as "The reasonably probable and legal use of vacant land or improved property, which is physically possible, appropriately supported, financially feasible, and that results in the highest value 1." 1 . Permissible Use. What uses are permitted by zoning and other legal restrictions? 2. Possible Use. To what use is the site physically adaptable? 3. Feasible Use. Which possible and permissible use will produce any net ret:tun to the owner of the site? 4. Maximally Productive. Among the feasible uses which use will pxA= the highest net rem (i.e,, the highest present worth)? Because the use of the land can be limited ty the presence of improvements, highest and best use is determined separately for the land or site as though vacant and available to be put to its highest and best use, and for the property as improved. The first determination reflects the fact that land value.is derived from potential land use,. The highest and best use of a property as improved refers to the optimal use that could be made of the property including all proposed structures. The determination of the highest and best use of Jod as though vacant i$ u ful for land or site valuation; determining the highest and best use of an improved property provides a decision regarding continued use or demolition of the property, Highest and Best Use As Vacant Legally Permissible The category of Legally Permissible uses includes an analysis of public development regulations, including current and possible future changes in zoning regulations and procedures, and private constraints including deed restrictions, leaises, or any known encumbrances on title. Zoning & Future Land Use As discussed earlier in the zoning section, the subject is dual zoned hi In4m River County as RS -3 and RS -1, for Single -Family Residential Use. Permitted uses l but are not limited for single-family dwellings, foster care facilities, amu radio communication towers (loss than 80 ft.), . commercial communications tower camouflaged up to 70 fL; Permitted use 'rude but are not limited to. Single -Fad Dwelling, Foster Came Facilities, Commm cations Towed (non -wireless facilities including TV and radio broadcast towers) less than 80 feet in height, Camouflaged Commercial radio towers up to 70 feet.. The subject has a Future band Use designation of Low Density Residential 2:(L-2, Meeh allows a maximum residenW. density of six (b) ung per acre and. a :Fuca .Use . designation of 0-2, Conservat on, that allows fbir l: unit per 40 aerfts. : l The Appraisal of heal Estate 12* Edition Pi*e 305, Appraisal Institute Tuttle-Armfield-Wagner Appraisal & Research Inc. Physical Factors The category of Physically Possible uses is an analysis of the subject's ability to support various improvement; types. Included in this category is an analysis of the physical attributes of the land, access and transportation, structure and available public services, environmental oonsiderations a1mg. w .euftat and expected future neighborhood developmealttt The subject parcel has access from 7 Street via a dirt road and during the property inspection, it was clear that ni of the land was wet/swampy and there were ravines/culverts around the northern and central elevations. Based on the subject's eastern elevation being identified as having approximately 19.45 -acres of wetland areas as identified by the National Wetlan& Inventory Mapping System, the subject likely could not support development without mitigation of the existing wetlands which is outside the scope of this appraisal assignment. The western portion of the parcel likely could suppmt development. An Environmental Study was conducted in 2024 by Water & Air Research, Inc. that confirmed approximately 53 percent of the site was identified as Mixed Wetland Hardwoods identified in the eastern elevation of the subject property as: shown in. the table below: Table I. The amount: of each altered land use type or nau* community type Witter Beach 73rd St property from the Florida Coop tandcover Nim ° . �-. . Tse/Natural Communiri- Acres _TRW L'' /AVet State hank Mangrove Svaof, 1 ' Wetland Secure S4 Mixed Hardwoo4ton&VO OW), AAM04 Vpland ;Aot raped Mesic Flatwgdds Ilei {t :: Upland Secure S4 _. Residential_ MGl. Dpmlty GM.. AM Abbatii tf l.,A �r,�,�r<o.i Total Alter TotIMatural WVland i' � e tla uci *''rte level of disturbance witb **The connnuuuty in parentheses (successional hardwood aerial interpretation, gess to the rap leased on *Appraiser's Note: the deviation between percent wetlands stems from not having cooresponding total acreage numbers We utilized the amount of wetlands as identified by the study but at the client's request, utilized the total acreage from the property appraiser records Financially Feasible Financial Feasibility is an analysis of the ability of the property to return the highest possible yield to the investment of land and improvements based on its income producing capability and the return requirements of investors in, the market. Tuttle-Armfield-Wagner Appraisal arch, Inc. Site utility is Poor. The subject has adequate size, sbam access, utilities, and topography for low intensity residential use. Considering neighborhood trends and physical features, the subject site is suited for low -intensity residentialuse. It stands within the floo&.Mne area. Insurance purchase is recommended. However, because of the presence +ofnearly 54% wetlands, the subject is likely not a randidate for adop�tidin into a censer ion area in the county. :However, the western elevation could likely support residential development consistent with the surrounding neighborhoods in the immediate area. Below is a subdivision directly adjacent to the subject parcel(s) that is cantly. proposed: Appraiser's Note: Directly adjacent and eastlsouth of at subject, GHO Hom»rock Shores is under site plan approval ,far the developmedt 4f e 103-161, single family subdivision. The total combined acreage of the site ,consist o, f 60.08 -acres. The subject is currently a candidate for acquisition by the Indian River County Parks & Conservation Department. Maximally Productive Use Reviewing the pesnaaitted principal uses set forth under the :ming ordinances; :it is our opinion that adoption into a conservation Vea would likely. be the best use, of the sum property considering the nearly 54% wetlands coverage. Tuttle-Armfield-Wagner Appraisal nc. Exposure Time Exposure time is the estimated length of time that the subject would have been offered on the market prior to a hypothetical sale of the property on the effective date of the appraisal. Based on data obtained from sales transactions and interviews with market participants, it is our opinion that the probable exposure time for the property at the concluded, "as is" market value is 3-4 Months for the effective date of June 9, 2025. Marketing Period Marketing period is an opinion of the amount of time it might to take to sell the subject at the concluded market value during the period immediately following the effective date of the appraisal. Because we foresee no significant changes in market conditions in the near term, it is our opinion that a reasonable marketing period for the subject is the same as its exposure time. Therefore, we estimate the subject's marketing period to be 3-4 Months for the effective date of June 9, 2025. Valuation Three basic approaches may be used, to arrive at an estimate of market value. They are 1. The Cost. Approach 2. The Income Approach 3. The Sales Comparison Approach Cost Approach The Cost Approach is summarized as Mows: . Cost New - Depreciation + Land Value = Value Income Approach The Income Approach converts the anticipated flow of fixture benefits (Micome) to a present value estimate through a capitalization and or a discounting process. Sales Comparison Approach The Sales Comparison Approach compares ado of similar properties with the :sttt property. Each comparable sale is adjusted for its hdbrior or superior characteri'sdos. The values derived from the adjusted comparable sales farm. a range of valm for the subject. By process of correlation and analysis, a final indicated value is derived. ` Final Reconciliation The appraisal process concludes with the Final Reconciliation of the values derived from the approaches applied for a single estimate of market value. Diftere ut properties require different means of analysis and lend themselves to one approach over the others. Analyses Applied Cost Approach The subject is vacant load and ti method does mt accurately reflect market participant actions. Sakes Comparison Approach (; There is adequate data to develop a value estimate and this approach reflects market behavior fnr this property type. Dome Aph.:.: - . . The subject is vacant J%W arld fulls methad does not accurately retket market partr,4)PA actions. Tuttle-Armfield-Wagner Appraisal & Research. Inc. 1 17.54 -Acres Residential Land — 3005 731d Street The Sales Comparison. Approach is bead; on the premise that a buyer would pay no more for a specific property than the cost of obtaining a property with the same quality, utility;: and perceived benefits of ownership. It is based on the principles of per and demand, balance, substitution and externalities. The following steps describe the applied proem of the Sales Comparison Approach. • The market in which the subject property competes is ':investigated; comparable sales, contracts for sale and cutrent offerings are review, • The most pertinent data is further anslyzod and the quality cif` i� "Oft is. dei • The most meaningful unit of value for the subject property is°fit., Each comparable sale is., analyzed and where appropriate, adjusted I* '113M �. the subject property. The vats iron of each compa4ble sale is analyzed and the data reconciled for a final indication of value via. the Sales Comparison. Approach. Lan Compambles We have researched comparable land sales for this analysis; these are documented on ft following pages and analysis grid. All sales have been researched 010110 MMOMUS sources and verified by a party to the transaction when available. In Ordo to tnake, tl comparison meaninsfiil, the comparable sales are reduced to a basic unit of comparison, i.e., the price paid per land square foot. The comparable land sales ars detailed on the following pages. ner Hppraisai & Kesearcn, Address 9050 66th Avenue ID City Vero Beach Date County Indian River Actual Price Zip 32958 Price Adjustment Tax ID 31392900000300000000 Price Grantor MBC Property Acyuistions, Price Per Acre Shape Inc. Access Grantee TCGFL Schumann 2, LLC Price Per Land SF Book/Page or Reference 3718/404 Conditions of Sale Financing Cash to seller Days on Market 16666 8/13/2024 $600,000 $0 $600,000 $100,000 $2.30 None known Not disclosed Acres 6.00 Zoning RM -6 Land SF 261,360 Utilities All available Usable Acres 6 Median Household Income $58,552 Corner No 3 Mile Popul 23,880 Visibility Above Shape Irregular Access Average Distance 3.68 This 6 -acre undeveloped wooded parcel is located on the east side of 66th Avenue just south of Barber Street in unincorporated Indian River County. The property is known as Hidden Acres Estate and a site plan has been submitted for the property to be subdivided into seven lots and developed with hawy custom homes starting at $780,000. The property soli for $600,000 to a developer. Tutft AutYiiield rAp f & Research, Inc. Address 2800 Barna Avenue City Titusville 4/15/2025 County Brevard Aclrmt1 Ffte $900,000 Zip 32780 Price Adjustment $0 Tax ID 22-35-16-00-21 Price $900,000 Grantor BREVARD LAND Price Per Acre $107,656 DEVELOPMENT LLC Grantee John & Cynthia O'Rourke Price Per Land SF $2.47 Book/Page orReference 10310/1529 Conditions of Sale None Noted Financing Market Terms Days on Market 379 Acres 8.36 Zoning Multifamily Land SF 364,162 Utilities All to site Usable Acres 8.36 Median Household Income $49,960 Corner No 3 Mile Popul 44,149 Visibility Average Shape Rectangular Access Average Distance 64.23 This is the sale of 8.36 acres located on the western elevation of Barna Avenue just south of Harrison Street. The land is zoned R-3 with a firture land use ofhigh density residential. Allowable density is currently 15 units per acre. The current site plan for the 8.36 acre parcel has six buildings with 20 units each for a total of 120 units. The footprint works with either two bedrooms in the center and one bedrooms on the ends (12 two bedrooms and 8 one bedrooms) or the reverse (12 one bedrooms and 8 two bedrooms). Approvals on the eastern portion ofthe land are expired and the western side never had approval The property was listed for $1,400,000 and after 379 days on market closed for $900,000. The property was recorded on April 15, 2025. Carl Lentze of SVN Alliance Commercial Real Estate Advisors was the listing agent Verification email sent Appraisal & C This is the sale of 9.73 acres of vacant land located on Laconia Street in Sebastian. The property is caned for'Sio; Family Residential allowing one unit per 40,000 square feet (10 single family residences could be built on this lot). The property was recorded on March 10, 2025 for a sale price of $500,000 or $51,387 on a per acre basis. The property was listed for approximately one month and was marketed to be subdivided into individual lots for single family homes. ner Appraisal & Research, Inc. Address XX Laconia Street ID 12196 City Sebastian Date 3/102025 County Indian River Actual Price $500,000 Zip 32958 Price Adjustment $0 Tax ID 31382600000100000000 Price $500,000 Grantor ScottFunnell Price Per Acre $51,387 Grantee Insite, LLC Price Per Land SF $1.18 Book/Page or Reference 3760/148 Conditions of Sale None Noted Financing Market Terms Days on Market 30 Acres 11.13 Zoning RE -40 Land SF 423,839 Utilities Nearby Usable Acres 9.73 Median Household Income $62,872 Corner No 3 Mile Popul 29,924 Visibility Average Shape Triangular Access Below Average Distance 544. : This is the sale of 9.73 acres of vacant land located on Laconia Street in Sebastian. The property is caned for'Sio; Family Residential allowing one unit per 40,000 square feet (10 single family residences could be built on this lot). The property was recorded on March 10, 2025 for a sale price of $500,000 or $51,387 on a per acre basis. The property was listed for approximately one month and was marketed to be subdivided into individual lots for single family homes. ner Appraisal & Research, Inc. Address 9823/1590 Conditions of Sale None Financing Celestial Drive ID 12736 City Grant Vakeria Date 6/30/2023 County Brevard Actual Price $450,000 Zip 32949 Price Adjustment Tax 11) 30-38-04-00-756 & 30-38- Price $450,000 Grantor Justly Group, LLC Price Per Acre $41,628 Grantee Chargen, LLC Price Per Land SF $0.96 Book/Page or Reference 9823/1590 Conditions of Sale None Financing Cash to Seller Days on Market 555 Acres 10.81 Zoning RR -1 Land SF 470,884 Utilities Well; Septic Usable Acres 9.36 Median Household Income Comer No 3 Mile Popul Visibility Below Average Shape Rectangular Access Below Average Distance 13.71 This is the sale of two parcels located in Grant-Valkeria. These lots are adjacent to the developing DR Horton Crystal Bay convnunity to the west The sites are located behind several residences and are not visible from the surrounding roads. The site has a 1.45 -acre pond on the southern border and approximately 0.22 acres of wetlands on the northeast border. The site is leve], clear, and primarily in the A flood zone classification Access to the site is via a 24 It flag stem in the cul-de-sac on Celestial Drive. The sites were listed by Scott Loveridge with Relentless Real Estate Co for $259,000 each and closed for $450,000. According to Mr. Loveridge, the sale was arms -length. He said there was a discount since the buyer purchased two lots. Inc. City Palm Bay County Brevard Zip 32905 Tax ID 28-37-23-00-761 Grantor SKA Properties, LLC Grantee Price Family Homes, Inc Book/Page or Reference 10011/1345 Financing Cash to Seller Acres 15.52 Land SF 676,051 Usable Acres 13 Comer No corner Visibility Average Access Average Date 3/8/2024 Actual Price $1,425,000 Price Adjustment $0 Price $1,425,000 Price Per Acre $91,817 Price Per Land SF $2.11 Conditions of Sale None Known ''ot&g RS -2 Utilities All Utilities Available Median Household Income 3 Mile Popul Shape Rectangular Distance 24;71. This is the sale of 15.52 acres of residential land south of Palm Bay Road, north of School Dr. NE, and on the west side of Glenham DR NE. The site is heavily vegetated. Brevard County Natural Resource Maps indicate +/- 9.85 acres of uplands. However, the buyer reported that they only had a small portion of wetlands, which would not require mitigation as it was below the threshold for mitigation. However, he did not specify the number of buildable acres. We assume the site is mostly buildable with +/- I3 acres of wetlands. The site is zoned medium -density residential, which permits lot sizes of 7,500 sq. ft. The site has 1.015 feet of road frontage on Glenham Dr, which would serve as site access. A local home builder purchased the site. Bill Price, the buyer and home builder, said the transaction was an arms length Mr. Price said they were going through the entitlement process but were not fWly entitled to site plan approval before closing. The site will be developed with 42- 75' single-family lots. ner 3tyH 3005 73rd Street "hero Beach Co 1 mp 9050 66th Avenue Vero Beach3,69 miles Comp 2 2800 Barna Avenue Tkoville 64.24 miles Comp.3 XX Laconia Street Sebastian 5:44miles CODV 4 Celestial Dtitve Grant-Valkeria 13.71 j*s:, Comp 5 Glenham Dr NE: PaknBay 23.72!ft-,: :. Tuttle-Armfield-Wagner Appraisal & Research, Inc. 5� I Analysis Grid The above sales have been analyzed and compared with the subject: proper. 'Gide have considered adjustments in the area of: 91 Property Rights Sold • Market Trends • Financing • Location Conditions of Sale • Physical Characteristics On the following pie is a sales compar ew: gtid di aying the subject property, #the comparables arid. the adjustments applied. Adchan 94$553rdAve. 9650 661h Avenue 200twwAvenue XXJACbffliiIbtd Celestial Drive GledtamDrNE City Vero Beach Van Beady rasvile Sebastian Gram-Valkeria Patin Bay. County lndianRiver Tridisafter Brevard hilianRiver Brevard Brevard Date 6/92025 6(13!2024 4,'15,'2025 3110.1025 6130/2023 318(1-024 Price -- $600,000 3900,000 $500,000 $450,000 $1,425,000 Lard SF 764.042 261,360 304,162 423,839 470,884 676,051 land SF Unit Price $2.30 $2,47 $1.18 50.96 S2.11 Property Rights Fee SiMle Fee Skrgile 0.0% Fee Simple 0.0% Fee Sanple 0.01/6 Fee Simple 0.0% Fee sit . UM Financing Convemooal Cash to seller 0.09; Market Terms 0.09: Market Tenm 0.096 Cash to Seller 0.09; cash to Sellat $✓ CorditionsofSale . Cash Now known 0.096 None Noted 0.0% None Noted 0.0% Ntape 0.0% None Known s0t0oy0om Treda s0eu� 6/92025 0.0% 0.0% 0.09 0 0.096 0,()% Adjusted Land SF Unit Price 52,30 52.47 51.18 S0.% 52.11 ,. Locano Average Slightly Below Avg. Average Avenge SSgthH Below Avg Sightly Below Avg ustment 5% 0"'. 0% 5% 5% - i twe Infwior Sinilar Sirrdar Inferior Interior Lard SF 764,042 261,360 3d4,1dR 423,839 470,884 676,051 %Adjustmera -20Ye ': -10% -10% -5% Quaitatr, Superior Superior Superior Superior Topop,aphy Wooded Iv svgrade,Wooded 1ft* NOad Wooded LeTll Clem LeveLWedands/Wooded %Adjustment -5% -S% 0% -10% 0% _ uaiwtrve Superior S Similar Superior Sinalar Shape Kq ly Ineg lw Ineg lar ., Tnar@dar Rectangular Recrang.tlar % Adjus6nem 01% - 0111. 0° 0 096 Quakatl T Sarrimr $arelar Snalar sirinlar Unities Nearby- Above All available f Nearby We4 Septic All Luhtics Available Ground Power .. .. .. .. .. 96 Adp,nrent -5% -5a% 0% 500 5% ualnathr Superior Superior Similar Superior Superior Zoning RS -3 Rht-6 Muttilamly - RE -40 RR -I RS -2 %Adjuscreat -5% -5% -5% 5% 5% uahmtiv Superior S rior Superior Inferior Inferior Access Below Average Average Average Below Atremge Below Avmrage Average %Adjustment -10% -10% 09'd 096 -10% uaitatisx Superior 5 erior Sbnilm Sinrilm Superior Net Adjucnnents -40.00'0 -40.0% -15.096 -15.0°,0 -100% Goss Adjustments so 0% 40.090 15.0% 35.0% 300% ner Appraisal & Research, 5 Analysis and Adjustments In order to make the comparison meaningful, the comparable sales are reduced to a basic unit of comparison, i.e., the price paid per square foot of GBA. For Property Rights, Financing, Conditions of Sale, Expenditures After Purchase, and Time -Market Conditions adjustments we have applied Quantitative adjustments. Quantitative analysis is used for the remaining physical features. We have considered each sale regarding its relative similarity with the subject in the factors noted above. Then a conclusion is drawn regarding the comparable sale's overall similarity with the subject. Adjustment to Price No additional price adjustments were required. Property Rights This adjustment is generally applied to reflect the transfer of property rights different from those being appraised, such as differences between properties owned in fee simple and in leased fee or partial interests. All the sales reported fee simple property rights purchased by owner users and no adjustments for this category are indicated. Financing This adjustment is generally applied to a property that transfers with atypical financing, such as having assumed an existing mortgage at a favorable interest rate. Conversely, a property may be encumbered with an above -market mortgage which has no prepayment clause or a very costly prepayment clause. Such atypical financing often plays a role in the negotiated sale price. In this case, no adjustment is warranted. Conditions of Sale This category reflects extraordinary motivations of the buyer or seller to complete the sale. Examples include a purchase for assemblage involving anticipated incremental value or a quick sale for cash. This adjustment category may also reflect a distress -related sale, or a corporation recording a non -market price. In this case, no adjustments are warranted. Economic Trends This category reflects investors' perceptions of prevailing market conditions. This adjustment category reflects value changes, if any, which have occurred between the date of the sale and the effective date of the appraisal. Overall, all sale comparables presented have occurred since June 2024 and no significant adjustments occurred during that period. No adjustments were necessary for economic trends/time. Location The subject is located in a residential area of Indian River County as part of unincorporated Sebastian. Location adjustments consider median household incomes and populations within three (3) miles. Comparable 1, 4, and S have slightly below average income indications as compared with the subject. No other adjustments for location were warranted. Physical Characteristics The sales are adjusted qualitatively for physical characteristic differences. We considered the size of the tracts (Land Square Feet), Topography, Configuration, Access to Utilities, Zoning Classification, and Access of each property. The adjusted values of the comparable properties range on a per land square moot basis from $0.91 to $1.90; the average is $1.31 per land sq=* foot and the median is °$1.38 per land square foot. All value indications have been considered, and in the final analysis, most weight has been given close to the median indication provided by sample of $1.35 per land square foot. High: $2.47 $1.90 - Average: SJ -80. $131 - -279s►_ Median:w33°0 Reconciled Value/Unit Value: $i.95 land sf Subject Size: 764.042 Indicated Value: $1#031,457 Reconciled Final As Is Value: $1,030,000 One Million Thirty Thousand Dollam Tuttle-Armfield-Wagner Ap Sales CompadvanA ' �-1114M 19.45 -Acres Wetlands — Eastern POMM of Subject Rami The Sales Comparison Approach is based on the premise that a buyer would pay no MM for a specific property than the cost of obtaining a property with the same quality, utility, and perceived beneft of.owners ip. it is based on the acs of supply and demand, balance, substitution and externalities. The following steps describe the applied process of the Sales Comparison Approach. • The market in which the subject property competes is, investigated; Viable sales, contracts for sale and current offerings are reviewed. • The most pertinent data is further analyzed and the quality of the transaction is determined. • The most meaningful unit of value for the subject property is detenniaW • Each comparable We is analyzed w4where .appwpiaw, adjusted to equate with the subject prop y. • The value indication of each comparable sale is analyzed and the data reconciled for a final indication of value via the Sales Comparison Approach. Land ps We have researched comparable land sales for this analysis; these are documented on the following pages and analysis grid. All sales have been researched through nu nous 'sources and verified by a party to the transaction when available.. In order to make, the comparison meaningful, the comparable sales are reduced to a basic unit of comparison, i.e., the price paid per land square foot. The comparable land sales are retailed on the. following pages. Tuttle-Armfield-Wagner Appraisal Research. Inc. 5 City Titusville County Brevard Zip 32796 Tag ID 21-34-16-00-10 Grantor Daniel Lushan Grantee Zahera Sadik Book/Page or Reference 9830/2144 Financing Cash to Seller Acres 12.39 Land SF 539,708 Usable Acres 5.26 Corner is not Visibility Below Average Access Average Date 7/6/2023 Actual Price $265,000 Price Adjustment $0 Price $265,000 Price PerAcre $21,388 Price Per Land SF $0.49 Conditions of Sale 1031 Exchange - Days on Market 103 Zoning Rl-B & OR Utilities Public Water/Sewer East Req. Median Household Income $63,489 3 Mile Popul 31,593 Shape Flag -shaped Distance 66.85 This is the sale of a 12.39 -acre flag -stem site located on the south side of Garden Street in Titusville. The site is wooded, with approximately 5.26 acres of wetlands and 7.13 acres of wetlands, primarily located in the center of the site. The site has dual zoning; RI -B, which permits up to 5.8 units per acre, and Open Space Recreational (OR). which is a very restrictive zoning classification. The OR zoning permits 1 Unit per 5 acres. The OR zoning is similarly located as the wetlands. The site is surrounded by a mix of residential and commercial uses is in close proximity to I-95. Tl:e site was listed by Maricia Barnett with the Barnett Group for $299,000 and closed for $365,000 after 103 days ofthe market. According to the buyer agent, Mr. Stephen Keener, the buyer needed to complete a 1031 transaction and the property met the dollar amount he needed. Mr. Keener said the buyer did not complete any environmental studies and has no plans for the property,WA is considered a speculative investment. I the City Merritt Island Date 3/72025 County Brevard Actual Price $585,000 Zip 32952 Price Adjustment $0 Tax ID 24-37-19-00-500 Price $585,000 Grantor Sasso Corp. Price Per Acre $331.698 Grantee Greg Dornau Price Per Land SF $0.77 Book/Page or Reference 10287/1494 Conditions of Sale None Noted Financing Market Terms Days on Market Unknown Acres 17.36 Zoning RU -1-11 Land SF 756,202 Utilities None Noted Usable Acres 0 Median Household Income $83,034 Corner is not 3 Mile Popul 26,947 Visibility Fair Shape Slightly Irregular Access Average Distance 48.11 This is the closed sale ofa 17.36 -acre fully wetland tract located east of Eddy Street in Merritt island. The property is zoned RU -1-11 for residential use in unincorporated Brevard County, with access from the end of Eddy Street. The property was a private transaction and was recorded with the Brevard County Property Appraiser on March 17, 2025. I nc. Address East Terminus of Jay Jay Rd ID 15971 City Titusville Date 6/28/2024 County Brevard Actual Price $129,400 Zip 32796 Price Adjustment $0 Tax ID 21-35-21-00-754 & 21-35- Price $129,400 21-00-755 Grantor Jesse J. Parrish I_I, TR, Price Per Acre $8,767 Cheryl Winstead Lentz TR, & Louis Parrish. TR Grantee St. John River Water Price Per Land SF $0.20 Management Di rict Book/Page or Refereece 10102/669 Conditions of Sale None Known Financing Cash to Seller Days on Market N/A Acres 14.76 Zoning AU Land SF 642,946 Utilities None Usable Acres 7.01 Median Household Income $58,577 Corner is not 3 Mile Popul 22,133 Visibility Poor Shape Irregular Access Poor Distance 68.28 This is the sale of two parcels of land totaling 14 76 acres of mixed wetlands in Titusville. The site has Estruaine wetlands along the east and Freshwater wetlands along the west. The FEC Railway bisects the site on the east. There is no paved road frontage, with access coming from a long unpaved driveway. This site appears to have been an off -market sale, verified via public records. It closed on June 28, 2024, for $129,400 or $8,767/acre. According to the St. Johns River Water Management District, the site was purchased at Fair Market Value for the purpose of conservation. Address 2250 N Banana River Dr ID 15965 City Merritt Island Date 5/10/2024 County Brevard Actual Price $550,000 Zip 32952 Price Adjustment $0 Tax ID 24-37-18-00-751 Price $550,000 Grantor Bluewater Pointe, LLC Price Per Acre $25,183 Grantee Merritt Island Haven, LLC Price Per Land SF $0.58 Book/Page or Reference 10060/1608 Conditions of Sale None Known Financing Cash to Seller Days on Market 306 Acres 21.84 Zoning RU -1-11 Land SF 951,350 Utilities Public Water/Sewer Usable Acres 3.06 Median Household Income Corner is not 3 Mile Popul Visibility Average Shape Irregular Access Average Distance 48.96 This is the sale of-'; 1.34 acres of Estuarine Wetlands located on the east side ofN. Banana River Drive, just east of the intersection ofN. Banana River Drive and Martin Boulevard. According to the Brevard County Natural Resource Maps, + -3.06 acres of uplands are dispersed throughout the site, and +/- 9-10 acres of submerged land. However, the area with the greatest development potential is 1.55 acres, fronting N. Banana River Drive on the north side. nc. Land Sales Comparables Map Legend Address Distance Sheet _ 3005 73rd met Vero Beach Comp 1 4001 Carden $trot Titusville 66,86 miles Coup 2 1375 Eddy Street Merritt Island 48.11 in les Cone 3 East Tern*vs of Jay. Jay Rd Tkusvdle 68.28 mites C2M 4 225(1 N Bamm Riva Dr Merritt Island 48,96 miles Id -Wagner Appraisal & Research, Inc. Analysis Grid The above sales have been analyzed and compared with the subject property. We have considered adjustments in the areas of • Property Rights Sold • Financing • Conditions of Sale • Market Trends • Location • Physical Characteristics On the following page is a sales comparison grid displaying the,s*od:pMperty,,ft comparables and the adjustments applied. Address 3005 73rd Slreef 4001 Gardenstreet 1375 Eddy Street Fast Temintrs of .lay Jay Rd 2250 N Banana River Dr City Vero Beach Titusville Merritt Island Titusville Merritt Island Couuy Indian River Brevard Brevard Brevard Brevard Date 6/9/2025 7/6/2023 3!7/2025 6;28/2024 5/10/2024 Price -- $265,000 $585,000 $129,400 $550,000 Land SF 847,242 539,708 756,202 642.946 951,350 Land SF Unu Price $0.49 $0.77 $0.20 $0.58 Property K911ts Fee Simple Fee Sirnp% Fee SkVIc 0.0% Fee Simple0.0% Fee Sitnp o Financing Correctional Cash to Seller 0.0% Market Tema 0.0% Cash to Seller 0.0% Cash to Seller 0.09A Conditions of Sale Cash 1031 0.0% None Noted 0.0% None Known 0.0°% NowKrown 0.0"/6 Sub,cq—t Trends admg 6/9/2025 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% O.00A Adjusted Land SF Unit Price $0.49 50.77 $0.20 50 58 Location Average Average Average Slightly Below Avg. Average % Adjustment 0% 0°% 5° 0 0% uawatm SiriBr Smalar Inferior Sbndar T Land SF 847,242 539,708 756,202 642,946 951,350 %Adjtatinent -5% 0% -5°% 0% Qualitative Superior Su alar Superior Serier Topography Wooded Level/Wooded/Wetlands Marsh Marsh LevellWetlards %Adjustment 0% 0° 0 0° a 0% --QUal!a—b- Sit>ttar Surular Sinalar SaY&T Shape Highly Irregular Flag -shaped Slightly Irregular Irregular Irregular % Adju store 0% 09 % 090 0% _—Q1216ative Smiler Sunlar Suralar Similar Utilities Nearby - Above Public Water/Sewer E)d None Noted None PublicWatedSewser Ground Power Rey. % Adjustment 0% 01'a 5q a -5% Qualitative Similar Sin&] Inferior Supenor Zorti RS -1 Rl-B&OR RU -1-1I AU RU -1-I1 %Adjustment 0% 0% 0% 0% traledtne WEE= Sundar Samar Simlar Net Adjuamrents 9A -5 01% 44ft 5.0°a -5.0% GrossAd'ustmetls 5.0% 7010% 15.0% 501a uttle-Armfield-Wagner Appraisal & Research, Analysis and Adjustments In order to make the comparison meaningful, the comparable sales are reduced to a basic unit of comparison, i.e., the price paid per square foot of GBA. For Property Rights, Financing, Conditions of Sale, Expenditures After Purchase, and Time -Market Conditions adjustments we have applied Quantitative adjustments. Quantitative analysis is used for the remaining physical features. We have considered each sale regarding its relative similarity with the subject in the factors noted above. Then a conclusion is drawn regarding the comparable sale's overall similarity with the subject. Adjustment to Price No additional price adjustments were required. Property Rights This adjustment is generally applied to reflect the transfer of property rights different from those being appraised, such as differences between properties owned in fee simple and in leased fee or partial interests. All the sales reported fee simple property rights purchased by owner users and no adjustments for this category are indicated. Financing This adjustment is generally applied to a property that transfers with atypical financing, such as having assumed an existing mortgage at a favorable interest rate. Conversely, a property may be encumbered with an above -market mortgage which has no prepayment clause or a very costly prepayment clause. Such atypical financing often plays a role in the negotiated sale price. In this case, no adjustment is warranted. Conditions of Sale This category reflects extraordinary motivations of the buyer or seller to complete the sale. Examples include a purchase for assemblage involving anticipated incremental value or a quick sale for cash. This adjustment category may also reflect a distress -related sale, or a corporation recording a non -market price. In this case, no adjustments are warranted. Economic Trends This category reflects investors' perceptions of prevailing market conditions. This adjustment category reflects value changes, if any, which have occurred between the date of the sale and the effective date of the appraisal. Overall, all sale comparables presented have occurred since July 2023 and no significant adjustments occurred during that period. No adjustments were necessary for economic trends/time. Location The subject is located in a residential area of Indian River County as part of unincorporated Sebastian. Location adjustments consider median household incomes and populations within three (3) miles. Comparable 3 has a slightly below average income indication as compared with the subject. No other adjustments for location were warranted. Physical Characteristics The sales are adjusted qualitatively for physical characteristic differences. We considered the size of the tracts (Land Square Feet), Topography, Configuration, Access �. to Utilities, Zoning Classification, and Usable Land SF of each property. � �:. I APM. r► ► A 1 u icon dusion adjusted values of the comparable ptoperties range on A per land square foot basis fiom $0.2110 $0,70; the average is $0.48 per land square font and the median is $0.51 per land square foot. All value indications have been consider4 mild in final analysis, most weight has been given close to the median indication proAd6d by sample of $0.50 per land square foot. numoerotLomtarames: 4 Unadjusted Adlusted "/oA LOW: $0.20 $0,21 5% High: $0.77. $0.70 -10% Average: $041 $0.48 -6% Median: $Ui3 $0.51 -5% Reconciled Value/Unit Value: $0.50 land sf Subject Size: 047,342 Indicated Value:1< Reconciled Final As Is Value: $42 Four Hundred Twenty Five Thousand Dollars Tuttle-Armfield-Wagner Appraisal & Research, Inc. flnui On t The process of reconciliation involves the analysis of each approach to. value. The quality of daft applied: the significance of each approach as it relates to market behavior and defensibility of each approach are considered and weighed. Finally, each is considered separately and comparatively with each other. This amount is deducted from the As Complete value in order to arrive ea the As Is Value. Value Indications Value Conclusion C urrent As Is Market Value free 5sr" 6191LULJ 1,41ti,000 The Value Conclusion is derived by talar the sum of the three land values n fallows: Residential Land -=17:54 Acm 41,030,000 Wetlands Area —19.45 Acres ,0-00 TotalAcreWe (36.99 -Aq1 $1,455.000 Cost Approach The ;.Cost Approach to Value is most applicable for new, nearly new, or proposed improvements which represent the Highest and Best Use for the land. A cost approach was not applied as the subject is vacant land and this method does not atrately reflect market participant actions. Sales Comparison Approach The Sale Comparison Approach is most reliable when the market provides an ample supply of improved comparable sales. A sales comparison analysis was considered and was developed as there is i adequate data to develop a value estimate and this approach reflects market behavior for t property type. The subjectindication A= this approach was supported with several tecent, comparable properties offering similar ut t to owner users. This approach is MOST relevant to owner users. We :place all weight ©n s approach, in line with the buyer profile. Income Approach — Direct Capitalization An .income approach was not applied as the. subject is vacant land and this method does not accurately reflect market participant actions,; Value Conclusion . Based on the data and analyses developed in this appraisal, vie have r+ciled to: the following value conclusion(s), as of June 9, 2025, subject to the Limiting Cronditions and Assumptions of this appraisal. J►11 Interest Appraised :.JKWHW#:lobe value uonciusim Cumd As Is Market Vahie Fee Simple 09=5 $1,,455,000 Tuttle-Armfield-Wagner Certification We certify that, to the best of our knowledge and belief: 1. The statements of fact eontdned in this report are true and Wit. 2. The reported analyses, opinions, and coWusions are limited only by the reported assumptions and limiting conditions and are our personal, impartial and unbiased: professional analyses,OPUUOIW, and conclusions, 3. We have no present or prospective interest in:or bails with.reVect to the property that is the subject of this report and have no personal interest in.or bias with respect to the parties involved with this assignment. 4. Our engagement in this assignment was not contingent upon developing or reporting predetermined results. 5. Our compensation for completing this assignment is not contingent upon the development or reporting of a predetermined value or direction in value that favors the cause of the client, the amount of the value opit#ion, the attainment of a stipulated result, or the occurrence of subsequent event directly related to the intended use of this appraisal. 6. This appraisal assignment was not made, nor was the appraisal rendered on the basis of a requested minimum valuation, specific valuation, or an amount which would result in approval ofa loan. 7. The reported analyses, opinions, and cat-lusituut were developed, and this report has been prepared, in conformity with the requirements of the Code of Professional Ethics and the Stands of-Professional Appraisal Practice of the Appraisal Institute, which include the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice. S. The use of this report is subject to the requirements of the Appraisal Institute relating to review by its duly authorized representatives. 9. Jason C. Malick, Trainee RI25267, provided significant help in site and building inspection and descriptions, tax and zoning analysis, and research of ooMparison sales. 10. 1, the supervisory appraiser of a registered trainee appraiser who contributed to the development or communication of this appraisal, hereby accept full and complete responsibility for any work performed'byy the registered trainee appraiser named in this report as if it were my own work. I.J. As of the date of this report, Matthew 3ehs, MAI has completed the continuing education program of the Appraisal Institute'. 12. We have made an inspection of the property that is the subject of this report. 13. The appraisers have not performed aprior appraisal or any services regarding the subject property, as an appraiser or in any other capacity, within the three period immediately preceding the agreement to perform the assignment. Tuttle-Armfield-Wagner Appraisal &Research. Inc. 6 0 Tuttle-Armfield-Wagner Appraisal & Research. Inc. Works Cited: ■ Appraisal Institute. The App of Real .F4raze. 15th ed. Chi go: Appraisal Institute,. 2020. PDF. ■ Appraisal Institute. The Diefloxmy ofReal Real Estate Appraisal. 6th ecL 201 S. PDF, ■ The Appraisal Foundation. 20-INZ021: tWorm Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice (USPAP).. W. Jammy 1, 2020 through December 3:1,. 2021 PDF, Market Value: As defined by the Office of the Comptroller of Currency (OCC) under 12 CFR, Part 34, Subpart C -Appraisals, 14.42. Definitions, the Board of Governors ,of the Federal Reserve System (FRS) :and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation in compliance with Title XI of FMA, as well as by the Uniforms Standards .of Appraisal Practice as promulgated by the Appraisal Foundation, is as follows, Market value means the most probable price which a property should bring in a competitive and open market under all conditions requisite to a fair sale, the buyer and seller each acting prudently and I mowledgeably, and assuming the price is not affected by undue stimulus. 'Implicit in this deftOm is the consummation of a sale as of a specified date ,and the paWng of title from seller to buyer under conditions whereby, 1. Buyer and seller are typically motivated; 2. Both patties are well informed or well advised, and acting in what they consider their own best interest; 3. A reasonable time is allowed for exposure in the open market, 4. Payment is made in terms of cash in U.S. dollars or in terms of financial arrangements compambie thereto; and 5. The price represents the normal consideration for the property sold unaffected by special or creative financing or sales concessions granted by anyone associated Aft the sale. Fee Simple Estate Absolute ownership unencumbered by any othet interest or estate, subject only to the limitations imposedby the governmental Powears of taxation, eminent domain, police power,and escheat. (Dictionary, bth Edition) . Tuttle-Armfield-Wagner Appraisal & Research, Inc. 761/1 Leased Fee Interest The ownership interest held by the lessor, which includes the right to receive the contract rent specified in the lease plus the reversionary right when the lease expires. (Dictionary, 6th Edition) Lease Types Absolute Net Lease - A lease in which the tenant pays all expenses including structural maintenance, building reserves, and management; often a long-term lease to a credit tenant. Gross Lease - A lease in which the landlord receives stipulated rent and is obligated to pay all of the property's operating and fixed expenses; also called full-service lease. Modified Gross Lease - A lease in which the landlord receives stipulated rent and is obligated to pay some, but not all, of the property's operating and fixed expenses. Since assignment of expenses varies among modified gross leases, expense responsibility must always be specified. In some markets, a modified gross lease may be called a double net lease, net net lease, partial net lease, or semi -gross lease. (Dictionary, 6th Edition) Marketing Time An opinion of the amount of time it might take to sell a real or personal property interest at the concluded market value level during the period immediately after the effective date of an appraisal. Marketing time differs from exposure time, which is always presumed to precede the effective date of an appraisal. (Advisory Opinion 7 of the Appraisal Standards Board of The Appraisal Foundation and Statement on Appraisal Standards No. 6, "Reasonable Exposure Time in Real Property and Personal Property Market Value Opinions" address the determination of reasonable exposure and marketing time.) (Dictionary, 6th Edition) Market Rent The most probable rent that a property should bring in a competitive and open market reflecting the conditions and restrictions of a specified lease agreement, including the rental adjustment and revaluation, permitted uses, use restrictions, expense obligations, term, concessions, renewal and purchase options, and tenant improvements (TIs). (Dictionary, 6th Edition) Exposure Time 1. The time a properly remains on the market. 2. The estimated length of time the property interest being appraised would have been offered on the market prior to the hypothetical consummation of a sale at market value on the effective date of the appraisal; a retrospective estimate based on an analysis of past events assuming a competitive and open market. (Dictionary, 6th Edition) Gross Building Area (GBA) Total floor area of a building, excluding unenclosed areas, measured from the exterior of the walls of the above -grade area. This includes mezzanines and basements if and when typically included in the region. (Dictionary, 6th Edition) ner Appraisal & Research, Inc. Stabilized Occupancy 1. The occupancy of a property that would be expected at a particular point in time, considering its relative competitive strength and supply and demand conditions at the time, and presuming it is priced at market rent and has had reasonable market exposure. A property is at stabilized occupancy when it is capturing its appropriate share of market demand. 2. An expression of the average or typical occupancy that would be expected for a property over a specified projection period or over its economic life. (Dictionary, 6th Edition) Appraisal & Research, Inc. Professional Qualifications Matthew W. Jehs EXPERIENCE: Current Managing Director for Tuttle-Armfield-Wagner Appraisal & Research, Inc., Mr. Jehs has 23 years of appraisal experience, receiving his MAI in 2008. He has performed property valuations for a broad array of retail, industrial, and office properties including shopping centers, office/warehouses, bulk distribution warehouses, heavy manufacturing, both low-rise and high- rise professional offices and medical office buildings. Valuations have also included surgical centers, limited -service hospitality properties, condominium developments and conversions, residential subdivisions, and vacant land. Specialized real estate assignments include right-of-way projects, Cape Canaveral Port Facilities, Kennedy Space Center assets, and Melbourne Airport Aviation land, and jurisdictional wetlands. Clients served include accountants, investment firms, law firms, lenders, private corporations, local municipalities, and public agencies, including Veterans Affairs, Florida DEP Approved Appraiser, and SJRWMD. Valuations have been utilized for mortgage loan purposes, equity participation, due diligence support, condemnation proceedings and insurance purposes. Assignments have included the valuation of existing and proposed properties, as well as market studies, highest and best use studies, and property value impact studies. EDUCATION: Bachelor of Arts Degree, Benedictine University, 2000 Appraisal Course Work Completed: Appraisal Institute 110 -Appraisal Principles 120 -Appraisal Procedures 210 -Residential Case Study 310 -Basic Income Capitalization 410 -Uniform Standards of Professional Practice — Part A 420 -Uniform Standards of Professional Practice — Part B 510 -Advanced Income Capitalization 520-1fighest and Best Use and Market Analysis 530 -Advanced Sales Comparison and Cost Approach 540 -Report Writing and Valuation Analysis 550 -Advanced Applications Continuing Education in USPAP, ARGUS, STDB.com LICENSES: State Certified General Real Estate Appraiser 4FL-RZ2806 PROFESSIONAL Member of the Appraisal Institute (MAI) #432527 ORGANIZATIONS: 2020 Past President Florida East Coast Chapter Appraisal Institute I have been qualified as an expert witness in Brevard County circuit court. I have r testified in court cases involving commercial Real Estate litigation. PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS FOR JASON C. MALICK EDUCATION: Bachelor of Arts Business Administration, University of Florida, 2004 LICENSES: State -Registered Trainee Appraiser, RI25267 APPRAISAL COURSEWORK: Appraisal Principles Appraisal Procedures Florida Appraisal Law 15 -Hour National USPAP Income Capitalization Approach Report Writing and Case Studies Sales Comparison and Cost Approach Market Analysis and Highest and Best Use APPRAISAL EXPERIENCE: Appraisal experience including Vacant Land, Multi - Family, Single -Family, Industrial, Retail, and other Commercial and Residential Properties PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE: • September 2021 to Present — Commercial and Residential Trainee, Tuttle-Armfield-Wagner Appraisal & Research, Melbourne, FL • January 2019 to January 2020 — Real Estate Agent Premier Properties and Coldwell Banker Paradise, Indialantic, FL Inc. 't �.Y b. + ,s_"� � 9�',� & r Tom„* �W��l�*lS��fF+' s _ immim NOR . . . . . . . . ... . ,wentai bond appraisal. - - From: Wendy Swindell <wswindeU&n rer.gov:> Sent: Monday, April 28, 2025 9,40 AA* ?o: Matthew Jehs <matthew I ' ,riprn> 1vic: Ashley J. Lingwood <alhlpi Jennifer Hyde <AbydrOindiyrlriver.gov> subject: RE_ Indian River . •• i(jlw'aisaist Please consider this emall as County approval for you to move forward with this work_ 'Haiti you, aro please W Me kDOW IF you #il aW -My FIs. Wendy Swindell_ Assistant .. 1590 9*Ai*`'.'li962 (772) 226-17B i 58 (cell) 610, Kilo M2710=*'Ok 3�Er�Fs�**ly Ce: Asf*fey (eh milli i sfris tricks Subject: Indian River county environmental t -z; Irais - . . Good afternoon. 1 received your voicemail and called back but you had le!Rfgr the day We are looking to start the appraisal process we dlS the phone a few weeks back. Can you please send me a proposal for appraisals the environmental Uond pftmss. and based on FDEP requirements, tow Uvea • , Manor t Please also include in your proposal a schOdule for completion of the appraisals - We may have additional contact information for the owners - please let me know it this is needed and I will find what we have. Thank you, and please let me know if we need to discuss any of this information. r Appraisal & Research, Inc. 7 Wendy Swindell Assistant Director Parks & conservation r r 1590 9ti' St SW - Vera beach - 32962 - ` t (772) 226-1781 • (772)269-A tCi0ft crRtoT' Nore new e*natt odaress: . More .new web oGOress: .. - . Find us on social M - - r Appraisal & Research, Inc. 7 Docusign Envelope ID: C4646808-2B19-436D-8A50-5AB4A82D3F11 Commercial Contract , , ,, Florida Realtors, - 1 1. PARTIES AND PROPERTY: Indian River County ("Buyer") 2 agrees to buy and John M Luther Trustee under William M Luther Irrevocable Trust ("Seller") 3 agrees to sell the property at: 4 Street Address: 2705-3005 73 St, Vero Beach FL 32967 5 6 Legal Description: FOLIO NUMBER: 32390300000003000001.0 - 24.99 acres & 32390200000500000001.0 - 12 acres 7 36.99 acres total 8 and the following Personal Property: 9 10 (all collectively referred to as the "Property") on the terms and conditions set forth below. 11 2. PURCHASE PRICE: $ 1,590,000.00 12 (a) Deposit held in escrow by: N/A $ 13 ("Escrow Agent") (checks are subject to actual and final collection) 14 Escrow Agent's address: Phone: 15 (b) Additional deposit to be made to Escrow Agent 16 ❑ within days (3 days, if left blank) after completion of Due Diligence Period or 17 ❑ within days after Effective Date $ 18 (c) Additional deposit to be made to Escrow Agent 19 ❑ within days (3 days, if left blank) after completion of Due Diligence Period or 20 ❑ within days after Effective Date $ 21 (d) Total financing (see Paragraph 5) $ 22 (e) Other $ 23 (f) All deposits will be credited to the purchase price at closing. 24 Balance to close, subject to adjustments and prorations, to be paid 25 via wire transfer. $ 1,590,000.00 26 For the purposes of this paragraph, "completion" means the end of the Due Diligence Period or upon delivery of 27 Buyer's written notice of acceptability. 28 3. TIME FOR ACCEPTANCE; EFFECTIVE DATE; COMPUTATION OF TIME: Unless this offer is signed by Seller 29 and Buyer and an executed copy delivered to all parties on or before , this offer 30 will be withdrawn and the Buyer's deposit, if any, will be returned. The time for acceptance of any counter offer will be 31 3 days from the date the counter offer is delivered. The "Effective Date" of this Contract is the date on which the 32 last one of the Seller and Buyer has signed or initialed and delivered this offer or the final counter offer or 33 . Calendar days, based on where the Property is located, will be used when 34 computing all time periods. Other than time for acceptance and Effective Date as set forth above, any time periods 35 provided for or dates specified in this Contract, whether preprinted, handwritten, typewritten or inserted herein, ending 36 or occurring on a Saturday, Sunday, national legal holiday, or a day on which a national legal holiday is observed will 37 extend to the next calendar day which is not a Saturday, Sunday, national legal holiday, or a day on which a national 38 legal holiday is observed. Time is of the essence in this Contract. 39 4. CLOSING DATE AND LOCATION: InMal Buyer (� (_) and Seller L (_) knowledge receipt of a copy of this page, which is Page 1 of 8 Pages. CC -6 Rev. 3/25 022025 Florida Realtors° Seria1#:012020.900175.9938713_._......._........._...__....___..___.__._.._-. ��II a�rm Z'i5implicity Docusign Envelope ID: C4646808-2619-436D-8A50-5AB4A82D3F11 40 (a) Closing Date: This transaction will be closed on 60 Days after Due Diligence ends (Closing Date), unless 41 specifically extended by other provisions of this Contract. The Closing Date will prevail over all other time periods 42 including, but not limited to, Financing and Due Diligence periods. In the event insurance underwriting is suspended 43 on Closing Date and Buyer is unable to obtain property insurance, Buyer may postpone closing up to 5 days after 44 the insurance underwriting suspension is lifted. 45 (b) Location: Closing will take place in Indian River County, Florida. (if left blank, closing will take place in the 46 county where the property is located.) Closing may be conducted by mail or electronic means. 47 5. THIRD PARTY FINANCING: 48 BUYER'S OBLIGATION: On or before N/A days (5 days if left blank) after Effective Date, Buyer will apply for third 49 party financing in an amount not to exceed N/A% of the purchase price or $0.00 , with a fixed 50 interest rate not to exceed —N/A% per year with an initial variable interest rate not to exceed N/A%, with points or 51 commitment or loan fees not to exceed NSA% of the principal amount, for a term of NSA years, and amortized 52 over N/A years, with additional terms as follows.- 53 ollows:53 CASH, NO FINANCING REQUIRED 54 Buyer will timely provide any and all credit, employment, financial and other information reasonably required by any 55 lender. Buyer will use good faith and reasonable diligence to (i) obtain Loan Approval within days (45 days if left 56 blank) from Effective Date (Loan Approval Date), (ii) satisfy terms and conditions of the Loan Approval, and (iii) close 57 the loan. Buyer will keep Seller and Broker fully informed about loan application status and authorizes the mortgage 58 broker and lender to disclose all such information to Seller and Broker. Buyer will notify Seller immediately upon 59 obtaining financing or being rejected by a lender. CANCELLATION: If Buyer, after using good faith and reasonable 60 diligence, fails to obtain Loan Approval by Loan Approval Date, Buyer may within days (3 days if left blank) 61 deliver written notice to Seller stating Buyer either waives this financing contingency or cancels this Contract. 62 If Buyer does neither, then Seller may cancel this Contract by delivering written notice to Buyer at any time thereafter. 63 Unless this financing contingency has been waived, this Contract shall remain subject to the satisfaction, by closing, of 64 those conditions of Loan Approval related to the Property. DEPOSIT(S) (for purposes of Paragraph 5 only): If Buyer 65 has used good faith and reasonable diligence but does not obtain Loan Approval by Loan Approval Date and 66 thereafter either party elects to cancel this Contract as set forth above or the lender fails or refuses to close on or 67 before the Closing Date without fault on Buyer's part, the Deposit(s) shall be returned to Buyer, whereupon both 68 parties will be released from all further obligations under this Contract, except for obligations stated herein as surviving 69 the termination of this Contract. If neither party elects to terminate this Contract as set forth above or Buyer fails to use 70 good faith or reasonable diligence as set forth above, Seller will be entitled to retain the Deposit(s) if the transaction 71 does not close. For purposes of this Contract, "Loan Approval" means a statement by the lender setting forth the terms 72 and conditions upon which the lender is willing to make a particular mortgage loan to a particular buyer. Neither a pre - 73 approval letter nor a prequalification letter shall be deemed a Loan Approval for purposes of this Contract. 74 6. TITLE: Seller has the legal capacity to and will convey marketable title to the Property by ❑x statutory warranty 75 deed ❑ special warranty deed ❑ other , free of liens, easements and 76 encumbrances of record or known to Seller, but subject to property taxes for the year of closing; covenants, 77 restrictions and public utility easements of record; existing zoning and governmental regulations; and (list any other 78 matters to which title will be subject) 79 80 provided there exists at closing no violation of the foregoing and nolle of them prevents 111hryer's intended use of the 81 Property as 82 (a) Evidence of Title: The party who pays the premium for the title insurance policy will select the closing agent 83 and pay for the title search and closing services. Seller will, at (check one) ❑ Seller's E Buyer's expense and 84 within 5 days after Effective Date or at least days before Closing Date deliver to Buyer (check one) 85 ❑ (i) a title insurance commitment by a Florida licensed title insurer setting forth those matters to be discharged by 86 Seller at or before Closing and, upon Buyer recording the deed, an owner's policy in the amount of the purchase 87 price for fee simple title subject only to exceptions stated above. If Buyer is paying for the evidence of title and 88 Seller has an owner's policy, Seller will deliver a copy to Buyer within 15 days after Effective Date. ❑x (ii.) an 89 abstract of title, prepared or brought current by an existing abstract firm or certified as correct by an existing firm. 90 However, if such an abstract travailable to Seller, then a prior owner's title policy acceptable to the proposed Buyer �) �_) and Seller ( ( ) a nowledge receipt of a copy of this page, which is Page 2 of 8 Pages. --__CC 8 _.... Rev- 3/25.. _ ......... ®2025 Floiids Re�tats* SWIM: 0120904M75493WM3 Si m implicity Docusign Envelope ID: C4646808-2619-436D-8A50-5AB4A82D3F11 91 insurer as a base for reissuance of coverage may be used. The prior policy will include copies of all policy 92 exceptions and an update in a format acceptable to Buyer from the policy effective date and certified to Buyer or 93 Buyer's closing agent together with copies of all documents recited in the prior policy and in the update. If such 94 an abstract or prior policy is not available to Seller then (i.) above will be the evidence of title. 95 (b) Title Examination: Buyer will, within 15 days from receipt of the evidence of title deliver written notice to Seller 96 of title defects. Title will be deemed acceptable to Buyer if (1) Buyer fails to deliver proper notice of defects or (2) 97 Buyer delivers proper written notice and Seller cures the defects within 5 days from receipt of the notice 98 ("Curative Period"). Seller shall use good faith efforts to cure the defects. If the defects are cured within the 99 Curative Period, closing will occur on the latter of 10 days after receipt by Buyer of notice of such curing or the 100 scheduled Closing Date. Seller may elect not to cure defects if Seller reasonably believes any defect cannot be 101 cured within the Curative Period. If the defects are not cured within the Curative Period, Buyer will have 10 days 102 from receipt of notice of Seller's inability to cure the defects to elect whether to terminate this Contract or accept 103 title subject to existing defects and close the transaction without reduction in purchase price. 104 (c) Survey: (check applicable provisions below) 105 X❑ Seller will, within days from Effective Date, deliver to Buyer copies of prior surveys, 106 plans, specifications, and engineering documents, if any, and the following documents relevant to this 107 transaction: 108 109 prepared for Seller or in Seller's possession, which show all currently existing structures. In the event this 110 transaction does not close, all documents provided by Seller will be returned to Seller within 10 days from the 111 date this Contract is terminated. 112 DX Buyer will, at ❑ Seller's [?7( Buyer's expense and within the time period allowed to deliver and examine 113 title evidence, obtain a current certified survey of the Property from a registered surveyor. If the survey reveals 114 encroachments on the Property or that the improvements encroach on the lands of another, ❑ Buyer will 115 accept the Property with existing encroachments ❑X such encroachments will constitute a title defect to be 116 cured within the Curative Period. 117 (d) Ingress and Egress: Seller warrants that the Property presently has ingress and egress 118 7. PROPERTY CONDITION: Seller will deliver the Property to Buyer at the time agreed in its present "as is" condition, 119 ordinary wear and tear excepted, and will maintain the landscaping and grounds in a comparable condition. Seller 120 makes no warranties other than marketability of title. In the event that the condition of the Property has materially 121 changed since the expiration of the Due Diligence Period, Buyer may elect to terminate the Contract and receive a 122 refund of any and all deposits paid, plus interest. if applicable, or require Seller to return the Property to the required 123 condition existing as of the end of Due Diligence period, the cost of which is not to exceed $0.00 (1.5% of 124 the purchase price, if left blank). By accepting the Property "as is", Buyer waives all claims against Seller for any 125 defects in the Property. (Check (a) or (b)) 126 ❑ (a) As Is: Buyer has inspected the Property or waives any right to inspect and accepts the Property in its "as is" 127 condition. 128 X (b) Due Diligence Period: Buyer will, at Buyer's expense and within 60 days from Effective Date ("Due 129 Diligence Period"), determine whether the Property is suitable, in Buyer's sole and absolute discretion. During the 130 term of this Contract, Buyer may conduct any tests, analyses, surveys and investigations ("Inspections") which 131 Buyer deems necessary to determine to Buyer's satisfaction the Property's engineering. architectural, 132 environmental properties; zoning and zoning restrictions; flood zone designation and restrictions; subdivision 133 regulations; soil and grade; availability of access to public roads. water, and other utilities; consistency with local, 134 state and regional growth management and comprehensive land use plans; availability of permits, government 135 approvals and licenses; compliance with American with Disabilities Act; absence of asbestos, soil and ground 136 water contamination; and other inspections that Buyer deems appropriate. Buyer will deliver written notice to 137 Seller prior to the expiration of the Due Diligence Period of Buyer's determination of whether or not the Property 138 is acceptable. Buyer's failure to comply with this notice requirement will constitute acceptance of the Property in 139 its present "as is" condition. Seller grants to Buyer, its agents, contractors and assigns, the right to enter the 140 Property at any time during the term of this Contract for the purpose of conducting Inspections, upon reasonable 141 notice, at a mutually agreed upon time; provided, however, that Buyer, its agents, contractors and assigns enter 142 the Property and conduct Inspections at their own risk. Buyer will indemnify and hold Seller harmless from 143 losses, damages, costs, claims and expenses of any nature, including attorneys' fees at all levels, and from 144 liability to any person, arisingfFeakilhe conduct of any and all inspections or any work authorized by Buyer. Buyer Buyer () �) and Seller ( ( �anowledge receipt of a copy of this page. which is Page 3 of 8 Pages. _ MG .Rev. 3/25... ®2025 Florlde Realtors@ Sedalk:0120204M754 W15 rm Simplicity Docusign Envelope ID: C4646808-2819-436D-8A50-5AB4A82D3F11 145 will not engage in any activity that could result in a mechanic's lien being filed against the Property without 146 Seller's prior written consent. In the event this transaction does not close, (1) Buyer will repair all damages to the 147 Property resulting from the Inspections and return the Property to the condition it was in prior to conduct of the 148 Inspections, and (2) Buyer will, at Buyer's expense release to Seller all reports and other work generated as a 149 result of the Inspections. Should Buyer deliver timely notice that the Property is not acceptable, Seller agrees that 150 Buyer's deposit will be immediately returned to Buyer and the Contract terminated. 151 (c) Walk-through Inspection: Buyer may, on the day prior to closing or any other time mutually agreeable to the 152 parties, conduct a final "walk-through" inspection of the Property to determine compliance with this paragraph and 153 to ensure that all Property is on the premises. 154 8. OPERATION OF PROPERTY DURING CONTRACT PERIOD: Seller will continue to operate the Property and any 155 business conducted on the Property in the manner operated prior to Contract and will take no action that would 156 adversely impact the Property after closing, as to tenants, lenders or business, if any. Any changes, such as renting 157 vacant space, that materially affect the Property or Buyer's intended use of the Property will be permitted [x only with 158 Buyer's consent n without Buyer's consent. 159 9. CLOSING PROCEDURE: Unless otherwise agreed or stated herein, closing procedure shall be in accordance with 160 the norms where the Property is located. 161 (a) Possession and Occupancy: Seller will deliver possession and occupancy of the Property to Buyer at 162 closing. Seller will provide keys, remote controls, and any security/access codes necessary to operate all locks, 163 mailboxes, and security systems. 164 (b) Costs: Buyer will pay Buyer's attorneys' fees, taxes and recording fees on notes, mortgages and financing 165 statements and recording fees for the deed. Seller will pay Seller's attorneys' fees, taxes on the deed and 166 recording fees for documents needed to cure title defects. If Seller is obligated to discharge any encumbrance at or 167 prior to closing and fails to do so, Buyer may use purchase proceeds to satisfy the encumbrances. 168 (c) Documents: Seller will provide the deed; bill of sale; mechanic's lien affidavit; originals of those assignable 169 service and maintenance contracts that will be assumed by Buyer after the Closing Date and letters to each 170 service contractor from Seller advising each of them of the sale of the Property and, if applicable, the transfer of its 171 contract, and any assignable warranties or guarantees received or held by Seller from any manufacturer, 172 contractor, subcontractor, or material supplier in connection with the Property; current copies of the condominium 173 documents, if applicable; assignments of leases, updated rent roll; tenant and lender estoppels letters (if 174 applicable); tenant subordination, non -disturbance and attornment agreements (SNDAs) required by the Buyer or 175 Buyer's lender; assignments of permits and licenses; corrective instruments; and letters notifying tenants of the 176 change in ownership/rental agent. If any tenant refuses to execute an estoppels letter, Seller, if requested by the 177 Buyer in writing, will certify that information regarding the tenant's lease is correct. If Seller is an entity, Seller will 178 deliver a resolution of its governing authority authorizing the sale and delivery of the deed and certification by the 179 appropriate party certifying the resolution and setting forth facts showing the conveyance conforms to the 180 requirements of local law. Seller will transfer security deposits to Buyer. Buyer will provide the closing statement, 181 mortgages and notes, security agreements, and financing statements. 182 (d) Taxes and Prorations: Real estate taxes, personal property taxes on any tangible personal property, bond 183 payments assumed by Buyer, interest, rents (based on actual collected rents), association dues, insurance 184 premiums acceptable to Buyer, and operating expenses will be prorated through the day before closing. If the 185 amount of taxes for the current year cannot be ascertained, rates for the previous year will be used with due 186 allowance being made for improvements and exemptions. Any tax proration based on an estimate will, at request 187 of either party, be readjusted upon receipt of current year's tax bill; this provision will survive closing. 188 (e) Special Assessment Liens: Certified, confirmed. and ratified special assessment liens as of the Closing Date 189 will be paid by Seller. If a certified, confirmed, and ratified special assessment is payable in installments, Seller will 190 pay all installments due and payable on or before the Closing Date, with any installment for any period extending 191 beyond the Closing Date prorated, and Buyer will assume all installments that become due and payable after the 192 Closing Date. Buyer will be responsible for all assessments of any kind which become due and owing after Closing 193 Date, unless an improvement is substantially completed as of Closing Date. If an improvement is substantially 194 completed as of the Closing Date but has not resulted in a lien before closing, Seller will pay the amount of the last 195 estimate of the assessment. This subsection applies to special assessment liens imposed by a public body and 196 does not apply to condominium association special assessments. Initial and Seller ( j ac nowledge receipt of a copy of this page, which is Page 4 of 8 Pages. CGB... R-. 3Q5 ._ . __ _. _ ®2025 Fondi3 Realtors setmw: tn209041IM7s41111113M3 rm mplicity Docusign Envelope ID: C4646808-2619-436D-8A50-5Al34A82D3F11 197 (f) Foreign Investment in Real Property Tax Act (FIRPTA): If Seller is a "foreign person"as defined by FIRPTA, 198 Seller and Buyer agree to comply with Section 1445 of the Internal Revenue Code. Seller and Buyer will 199 complete, execute, and deliver as directed any instrument, affidavit, or statement reasonably necessary to comply 200 with the FIRPTA requirements, including delivery of their respective federal taxpayer identification numbers or 201 Social Security Numbers to the closing agent. If Buyer does not pay sufficient cash at closing to meet the 202 withholding requirement, Seller will deliver to Buyer at closing the additional cash necessary to satisfy the 203 requirement. 204 10. ESCROW AGENT: Seller and Buyer authorize Escrow Agent or Closing Agent (collectively "Agent") to receive, 205 deposit, and hold funds and other property in escrow and, subject to collection, disburse them in accordance with the 206 terms of this Contract. The parties agree that Agent will not be liable to any person for misdelivery of escrowed items to 207 Seller or Buyer, unless the misdelivery is due to Agent's willful breach of this Contract or gross negligence. If Agent 208 has doubt as to Agent's duties or obligations under this Contract, Agent may, at Agent's option, (a) hold the escrowed 209 items until the parties mutually agree to its disbursement or until a court of competent jurisdiction or arbitrator 210 determines the rights of the parties or (b) deposit the escrowed items with the clerk of the court having jurisdiction over 211 the matter and file an action in interpleader. Upon notifying the parties of such action, Agent will be released from all 212 liability except for the duty to account for items previously delivered out of escrow. If Agent is a licensed real estate 213 broker, Agent will comply with Chapter 475, Florida Statutes. In any suit in which Agent interpleads the escrowed items 214 or is made a party because of acting as Agent hereunder, Agent will recover reasonable attorney's fees and costs 215 incurred, with these amounts to be paid from and out of the escrowed items and charged and awarded as court costs 216 in favor of the prevailing party. 217 11. CURE PERIOD: Prior to any claim for default being made, a party will have an opportunity to cure any alleged 218 default. If a party fails to comply with any provision of this Contract, the other party will deliver written notice to the non - 219 complying party specifying the non-compliance. The non -complying party will have 5 days (5 days if left blank) after 220 delivery of such notice to cure the non-compliance. Notice and cure shall not apply to failure to close. 221 12. FORCE MAJEURE: Buyer or Seller shall not be required to perform any obligation under this Contract or be liable 222 to each other for damages so long as performance or non-performance of the obligation, or the availability of services, 223 insurance, or required approvals essential to Closing, is disrupted, delayed, caused or prevented by Fbrce Majeure. 224 "Force Majeure" means: hurricanes, floods, extreme weather, earthquakes, fire, or other acts of God, unusual 225 transportation delays, or wars, insurrections, or acts of terrorism, which, by exercise of reasonable diligent effort, the 226 non-performing party is unable in whole or in part to prevent or overcome. All time periods, including Closing Date, will 227 be extended a reasonable time up to 7 days after the Force Majeure no longer prevents performance under this 228 Contract, provided, however, if such Force Majeure continues to prevent performance under this Contract more than 229 30 days beyond Closing Date, then either party may terminate this Contract by delivering written notice to the other 230 and the Deposit shall be refunded to Buyer, thereby releasing Buyer and Seller from all further obligations under this Contract. 231 13. RETURN OF DEPOSIT: Unless otherwise specified in the Contract, in the event any condition of this Contract is 232 not met and Buyer has timely given any required notice regarding the condition having not been met, Buyer's deposit 233 will be returned in accordance with applicable Florida Laws and regulations. 234 14. DEFAULT: 235 (a) In the event the sale is not closed due to any default or failure on the part of Seller other than failure to make 236 the title marketable after diligent effort, Buyer may elect to receive return of Buyer's deposit without thereby 237 waiving any action for damages resulting from Seller's breach and may seek to recover such damages or seek 238 specific performance. If Buyer elects a deposit refund, Seller may be liable to Broker for the full amount of the 239 brokerage fee. 240 (b) In the event the sale is not closed due to any default or failure on the part of Buyer, Seller may either (1) 241 retain all deposit(s) paid or agreed to be paid by Buyer as agreed upon liquidated damages, consideration for the 242 execution of this Contract, and in full settlement of any claims, upon which this Contract will terminate or (2) seek 243 specific performance. If Buyer fails to timely place a deposit as required by this Contract, Seller may either (1) 244 terminate the Contract and seek the remedy outlined in this subparagraph or (2) proceed with the Contract without 245 waiving any remedy for Buyer's default. 246 15. ATTORNEY'S FEES AND COSTS: In any claim orcoMoversy arising outofor relating to this Contract, the 247 prevailing party, which for purposes of this provision will include Buyer, Seller and Broker, will be awarded reasonable 248 attorneys' fees, costs, and expenses. 249 16. NOTICES: All notices will be in writing and may be delivered by mail, overnight courier, personal delivery, or 250 electronic means. Parties agree toW.011 notices to addresses specified on the signature page(s). Any notice. Buyer () ( ) and Seller ( L_Cwledge receipt of a copy of this page, which is Page 5 of 8 Pages. MG Rev. 3125 02025 Florida Realtors• SwMW. 012024-000175.9939713 rm Simplicity Docusign Envelope ID: C4646808-2619-436D-8A50-5AB4A82D3F11 251 document, or item given by or delivered to an attorney or real estate licensee (including a transaction broker) 252 representing a party will be as effective as if given by or delivered to that party 253 17. DISCLOSURES: 254 (a) Commercial Real Estate Sales Commission Lien Act: The Florida Commercial Real Estate Sales 255 Commission Lien Act provides that a broker has a lien upon the owner's net proceeds from the sale of 256 commercial real estate for any commission earned by the broker under a brokerage agreement. The lien upon the 257 owner's net proceeds is a lien upon personal property which attaches to the owner's net proceeds and does not 258 attach to any interest in real property. This lien right cannot be waived before the commission is earned. 259 (b) Special Assessment Liens Imposed by Public Body: The Property may be subject to unpaid special 260 assessment lien(s) imposed by a public body. (A public body includes a Community Development District.) Such 261 liens, if any, shall be paid as set forth in Paragraph 9(e). 262 (c) Radon Gas: Radon is a naturally occurring radioactive gas that, when it has accumulated in a building in 263 sufficient quantities, may present health risks to persons who are exposed to it over time. Levels of radon that 264 exceed federal and state guidelines have been found in buildings in Florida. Additional information regarding radon 265 and radon testing may be obtained from your county public health unit. 266 (d) Energy -Efficiency Rating Information: Buyer acknowledges receipt of the information brochure required by 267 Section 553.996, Florida Statutes. 268 18. RISK OF LOSS: 269 (a) If, after the Effective Date and before closing, the Property is damaged by fire or other casualty, Seller will 270 bear the risk of loss and Buyer may cancel this Contract without liability and the deposit(s) will be returned to 271 Buyer. Alternatively, Buyer will have the option of purchasing the Property at the agreed upon purchase price and 272 Seller will credit the deductible, if any and transfer to Buyer at closing any insurance proceeds, or Seller's claim 273 to any insurance proceeds payable for the damage. Seller will cooperate with and assist Buyer in collecting any 274 such proceeds. Seller shall not settle any insurance claim for damage caused by casualty without the consent of 275 the Buyer. 276 (b) If, after the Effective Date and before closing, any part of the Property is taken in condemnation or under the 277 right of eminent domain, or proceedings for such taking will be pending or threatened, Buyer may cancel this 278 Contract without liability and the deposit(s) will be returned to Buyer. Alternatively, Buyer will have the option of 279 purchasing what is left of the Property at the agreed upon purchase price and Seller will transfer to the Buyer at 280 closing the proceeds of any award, or Seller's claim to any award payable for the taking. Seller will cooperate 281 with and assist Buyer in collecting any such award. 282 19. ASSIGNABILITY; PERSONS BOUND: This Contract may be assigned to a related entity, and otherwise ❑ is not 283 assignable ❑x is assignable. If this Contract may be assigned, Buyer shall deliver a copy of the assignment agreement 284 to the Seller at least 5 days prior to Closing. The terms "Buyer, " "Seller" and "Broker" may be singular or plural. This 285 Contract is binding upon Buyer, Seller and their heirs, personal representatives, successors and assigns (if 286 assignment is permitted). 287 20. MISCELLANEOUS: The terms of this Contract constitute the entire agreement between Buyer and Seller. 288 Modifications of this Contract will not be binding unless in writing, signed and delivered by the party to be bound. 289 Signatures, initials, documents referenced in this Contract. counterparts and written modifications communicated 290 electronically or on paper will be acceptable for all purposes, including delivery, and will be binding. Handwritten or 291 typewritten terms inserted in or attached to this Contract prevail over preprinted terms. If any provision of this Contract 292 is or becomes invalid or unenforceable, all remaining provisions will continue to be fully effective. This Contract will be 293 construed under Florida law and will not be recorded in any public records. 294 21. BROKERS: Neither Seller nor Buyer has used the services of, or for any other reason owes compensation to, a 295 licensed real estate Broker other than: 296 (a) Seller's Broker: (Company Name) (Licensee) 297 (Address, Telephone, Fax, E-mail) 298 who ❑ is a single agent ❑ is a transaction broker ❑ has no brokerage relationship and who will be compensated by 299 ❑ Seller ❑ Buyer ❑ both parties pursuant to ❑ a listing agreement ❑ other (specify) 300 301 Initial 302 (b) Buyer's Broker: COL R I TERNATIONAL GERARD YETMING Buyer �_� �_) and Seller acknowledge receipt of a copy of this page, which is Page 6 of 8 Pages. CG8_..._--- Rev. 3/25 02025 Florida Realtors* Sena* 0420904 B'i754M8713 _Vrm �mplicity Docusign Envelope ID: C4646808-2619-436D-8A50-5AB4A82D3F11 (Company Name) (Licensee) 303 801 Brickell Ave Ste900 Miami, FL 33131 305-342-5059 Gerard.Yetming@colliers.com (Address, Telephone. Fax, E-mail) 304 who ❑ is a single agent ❑x is a transaction broker ❑ has no brokerage relationship and who will be compensated by 305 ❑ Seller's Broker ❑ Seller ❑x Buyer ❑ both parties pursuant to ❑ other (specify) 306 This contract 4% of purchasing price payable at closing 307 (collectively referred to as "Broker") in connection with any act relating to the Property, including but not limited to 308 inquiries, introductions, consultations, and negotiations resulting in this transaction. Seller and Buyer agree to 309 indemnify and hold Broker harmless from and against losses, damages, costs and expenses of any kind, including 310 reasonable attorneys' fees at all levels, and from liability to any person, arising from (1) compensation claimed which is 311 inconsistent with the representation in this Paragraph, (2) enforcement action to collect a brokerage fee pursuant to 312 Paragraph 10, (3) any duty accepted by Broker at the request of Seller or Buyer, which is beyond the scope of 313 services regulated by Chapter 475, Florida Statutes, as amended, or (4) recommendations of or services provided and 314 expenses incurred by any third party whom Broker refers, recommends, or retains for or on behalf of Seller or Buyer. 315 22. OPTIONAL CLAUSES: (Check if any of the following clauses are applicable and are attached as an addendum to 316 this Contract): 317 ❑ (A) Arbitration ❑ (E) Seller Warranty ❑ (1) Existing Mortgage 318 ❑ (B) Section 1031 Exchange ❑ (F) Coastal Construction Control Line ❑ (J) Buyer's Attorney Approval 319 ❑ (C) Property Inspection and Repair ❑ (G) Flood Area Hazard Zone ❑ (K) Seller's Attorney Approval 320 ❑ (D) Seller Representations ❑ (H) Seller Financing ❑ Other 321 23. ADDITIONAL TERMS: 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 THIS IS INTENDED TO BE A LEGALLY BINDING CONTRACT. IF NOT FULLY UNDERSTOOD, SEEK THE 333 ADVICE OF AN ATTORNEY PRIOR TO SIGNING. BROKER ADVISES BUYER AND SELLER TO VERIFY ALL 334 FACTS AND REPRESENTATIONS THAT ARE IMPORTANT TO THEM AND TO CONSULT AN APPROPRIATE 335 PROFESSIONAL FOR LEGAL ADVICE (FOR EXAMPLE, INTERPRETING CONTRACTS, DETERMINING THE 336 EFFECT OF LAWS ON THE PROPERTY AND TRANSACTION, STATUS OF TITLE, FOREIGN INVESTOR 337 REPORTING REQUIREMENTS, ETC.) AND FOR TAX, PROPERTY CONDITION, ENVIRONMENTAL AND OTHER 338 ADVICE. BUYER ACKNOWLEDGES THAT BROKER DOES NOT OCCUPY THE PROPERTY AND THAT ALL 339 REPRESENTATIONS (ORAL, WRITTEN OR OTHERWISE) BY BROKER ARE BASED ON SELLER 340 REPRESENTATIONS OR PUBLIC RECORDS UNLESS BROKER INDICATES PERSONAL VERIFICATION OF 341 THE REPRESENTATION. BUYER AGREES TO RELY SOLELY ON SELLER, PROFESSIONAL INSPECTORS AND 342 GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES FOR VERIFICATION OF THE PROPERTY CONDITION, SQUARE FOOTAGE AND 343 FACTS THAT MATERIALLY AFFECT PROPERTY VALUE. .. Initial Buj►K �� (� and Seller ( ) acknowledge receipt of a copy of this page, which is Page 7 of 8 Pages. CC-6....__Rev L.=5._._. _ ... _._ C2025 Floods Realtors SetNW: 01�4Y0D17�0lMbB77S m �rmp.licity Docusign Envelope ID: C4646808-2131 9-436D-8A50-5AB4A82D3F1 1 344 Each person signing this Contract on behalf of a party that is a business entity represents and warrants to the other 345 party that such signatory has full power and authority to enter into and perform this Contract in accordance with its 346 terms and each person executing this Contract and other documents on behalf of such party has been duly authorized 347 to do so. 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 ATTENTION: SELLER AND BUYER CONVEYANCES TO FOREIGN BUYERS: Part III of Chapter 692, Sections 692.201 - 692.205, Florida Statutes, 2023 (the "Act"), in part, limits and regulates the sale, purchase and ownership of certain Florida properties by certain buyers who are associated with a "foreign country of concern", namely: the People's Republic of China, the Russian Federation, the Islamic Republic of Iran, the Democratic People's Republic of Korea, the Republic of Cuba, the Venezuelan regime of Nicolas Maduro, or the Syrian Arab Republic. It is a crime to buy or knowingly sell property in violation of the Act. At time of purchase, Buyer must provide a signed Affidavit which complies with the requirements of the Act. Seller and Buyer are advised to seek legal counsel regarding their respective obligations and liabilities under the Act. (Signature of Buyer Date: 358 Tax ID No.: (Typed or Printed Name of Buyer) 359 Title: 360 (Signature of Buyer 361 (Typed or Printed Name of Buyer) 362 Title: 363 Buyer's Address for purpose of notice 364 365 Telephone: Date: Tax ID No.: Telephone: Facsimile -D. Signed by: Email: IL Date- (Signature of a ler 366 John Luther Tax ID No.: (Typed or Printed Name of Seller) 367 Title: Owner Telephone: 368 Date: 369 (Signature of Seller) (Typed or Printed Name of Seller) 370 Title: 371 Seller's Address for purpose of notice: 372 Facsimile: Tax ID No.: Telephone: Email: 10/8/2025 772-563-7478 Florida REALTOW makes no representation as to the legal validity or adequacy of any provision of this form in any specific transaction. This standardized form should not be used in complex transactions or with extensive riders or additions. This form is available for use by the entire real estate industry and is not intended to identify the user as REALTOR°. REALTOR' is a registered collective membership mark which may be used only by real estate licensees who are members 9QMe NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS"and who subscribe to its Code of Ethics. The copyright laws of United States (17 U.S. C orbid a unauthorized reproduction of this form by any means including facsimile or computerized forms. r/ Buyer and Seller ge receipt of a copy of this page, which is Page 8 of 8 Pages. CC -6 Rev. 3125 82025 Florida Realtors SeriaW 012020.900175-9938713 rm Simplicity a n t{ Parks, Recreation & Conservation " ENVIRONMENTAL . " LANDS ACQUISITION PROGRAM Recommendations from the Environmental Lands Acquistion Panel NOMINATION ROUND 2 & 3 Beth Powell - PRC Director Q 772-226-1780 Wendy Swindell - PRC Asst. Director 1992 & 2004 ENVIRONMENTAL LANDS BOND REFERENDA Previous environmental land bond referenda facilitated the acquisition of environmentally significant lands in Indian River County. The $26M bond referendum issued in 1992 and the $50M bond referendum issued in 2004 were leveraged to purchase nearly 12,000 acres of land at a total cost of $138M. Indian River County manages +/- 2,300 acres which is actively managed and open to the public 5,622 acres managed through leases & management agreements 3,761 acres were protected through conservation easements prohibiting future development & ensuring preservation of natural resources in perpetuity IRC Board of County Commissioners November 18, 2025 %0 1 Passed by Voters in November 2022 2022 ENVIRONMENTAL LANDS To acquire and permanently preserve environmentally significant lands to restore the Indian River Lagoon, protect water resources, natural areas, wildlife habitat, drinking water resources, and construct public access improvements related thereto, shall Indian River County be authorized to issue general obligation bonds up to $50,000,000, maturing within 20 years from each issuance, not exceeding the legal maximum interest rate, payable from ad valorem taxes, with full public disclosure of all spending through annual independent audits? Yes/No Update Establish the • Environmental Environmental Lands Lands Program Acquistion ' Guide Panel ENVIRONMENTAL LANDS PROGRAM GUIDE & ACQUISTION PANEL tfLnvAp)ntal Lands Program Guide (ELP Guide) is to be as the p imary document that contains the policies, standards, and procedures relating to environmentally significant land acquisition and management activities. With respect to the ELP Guide, the Indian River County Board of County Commissioners (BOCC) will have the ultimate approval authority on its adoption and revisions. The BOCC approved a draft of the Guide on 9/20/22 ` and the final Guide was approved by the BOCC on 12/12/2023 as recommended by the ELAP Between March & June 2022 the BOCC nominated and approved the 9 member Environmental Lands Acquistion Panel (ELAP) The ELAP Panel meets on the 3 Tuesday of each month; Public comment is encouraged s �M ' x MATRIX EVALUATION ®Evaluation Fac:ors'Neight FA6C ORS 2-2 riamral communnv Petenna -,.- � Habitat Corridors & Greenway, Y N .0 landscape (incl. Water d C Resour es) Recreational & -■�: V Etlucationa{ _— 0 5 10 15 C Pureha.e Need vs Alte -i..s a P N O ai C y Vulnerability Land Manageme t " U ,O TSN C... e r ative AcOuisilion/Gra �`. � '' i C 4/ U Potential Favorable Mark o. 0 Conditian. a` Qualitative Considerations Property Acquisition Considerations Qualitative considerations/factors are used to evaluate lands by their physical characteristics as well as ecological value, and compatibility with resource protection goals (pg. 26). Property acquisition consideration provides value toward achieving the goal in land acquisition, i.e. most value for the money (pg. 29) ELP Guide, 12/12/2023 ELAP SCORIN G M TI i llk Based on ELAP Discussions ELAP Reviews the Nominations and Ranks the parcels into Tiers 1, 2 & 3 Recommended Ranking is Presented to the BCC for Guidance on Nominations to be Pursued ELAP Guide Modified by ELAP October 2023 and BOCC approved the final in December 2023 Initial Nomination Cycle Opened on March 1, 2024. Nomination period is six months; This ranking includes the second and third nomination periods Nominations open to the public. Nominations received via email, HUB, and mail NOMINATION PROCESS Coy Nominations reviewed to determine eligibility based on minimum criteria All nominated parcels added to Dashboard ELAP discusses nominated parcels to evaluate consistency with the minimum criteria OVERVIEW j \ Standard environmental assessment reports were created for eligible parcels All reports and any other application information is added to the HUB 4CT/�J 14 nominations were received from November 1, 2024 - August 31, 2025. One project from Period 1 was reclassified as a willing seller and voted to be ranked in current ranking period. 10 willing seller projects Informational meeting to discuss the nomination process was held in September 2025 ELAP matrix scores were received from ELAP in October 2025 Submitted scores were tabulated in preparation for the October 21, 2025 ranking meeting Ranking meeting was held and ranking table was generated for presentation to BoCC MATRIX EVALUATION At VWy6 Factors Natural Communities Focusing on extent and condition of natural areas (consideration of biodiversity >biodiversity typically>value) Habitat Value Observed & potential Species (>species indicative of >value) Corridors & Greenways Connections to other natural/protected areas Landscape Value ` Recreation & Education ,�+1? Opportunity for recreation and/or environmental education Property Acquisition Considerations Purchase Need Vs. Alternatives Best value for the $ Purchase Need/Other Protection Outright purchase to protect should be a last alternative .; Vulnerability Threat of conversion to urban/agricultural use Regulatory limitations (i.e. zoning, difficulty in permitting, required mitigation) Land Management Constraints Limitations on implementing management & associated costs Cooperative Acquisition & Grant Potential Environmental Lands Program Guide "Better value` with cost sharing BOCC Approved 12/12/2023 Favorable Market Conditions pages 26-30 A favorable market with willing sellers when comparing one property to another ELAP Guide Modified by ELAP October 2023 and BOCC approved the final in December 2023 Initial Nomination Cycle Opened on March 1, 2024. Nomination period is six months; This ranking includes the second and third nomination periods Nominations open to the public. Nominations received via email, HUB, and mail NOMINATION PROCESS Coy Nominations reviewed to determine eligibility based on minimum criteria All nominated parcels added to Dashboard ELAP discusses nominated parcels to evaluate consistency with the minimum criteria OVERVIEW j \ Standard environmental assessment reports were created for eligible parcels All reports and any other application information is added to the HUB 4CT/�J 14 nominations were received from November 1, 2024 - August 31, 2025. One project from Period 1 was reclassified as a willing seller and voted to be ranked in current ranking period. 10 willing seller projects Informational meeting to discuss the nomination process was held in September 2025 ELAP matrix scores were received from ELAP in October 2025 Submitted scores were tabulated in preparation for the October 21, 2025 ranking meeting Ranking meeting was held and ranking table was generated for presentation to BoCC FEE SIMPLE NJOMINAT10NS • ..s ce.n ae..er .er.e�.e 'Reclassified nomination from Period 1 (Changed from unwilling to willing seller) FEE SIMPLE *0 W@ilsi@ ZI OR6 Prong Linus —39.4 -acre project composed of a single parcel Current zoning is Agriculture -1, with future land use is Conservation -3 Located in proximity to the St. Sebastian River Preserve State Park Approximately 0.5mi downstream from Cypress Bend Preserve along the South Prong of the river. Potential to restore scrub habitat to create a Florida Scrub -jay stopover location for birds dispersing from county CAs to the SSRSP The property is within the Florida Forever Eco Greenway Priority 4 Corridor and along the blueway of the Sebastian River Potential recreation activities could include kayaking, fishing, and wildlife viewing FEE SIMPLE ITOWN iQA 40ftsrr —9.7 -acre project composed of a single parcel with an existing home Current zoning is Single -Family Residential District (RS -3) Located adjacent to the PINWR Korangy Tract Historically forested with coastal hammock with a canopy of live oaks, cabbage palms, red bay, strangler fig, gumbo limbo Potential exists for rare plants and animals to occur in coastal strand, maritime hammock, mangrove swamp, beach/dune, or aquatic habitats Potential recreational activities associated with the beach, river overlook, and shoreline fishing in the IRL FEE SIMPLE IMM4 Nd kT401916e Shoreline —38.8 -acre project composed of two parcels Nominated by the landowner representative Current and future land use zoning is Agricultural -3 Located west of Blue Cypress Lake, in proximity to the Blue Cypress Conservation Area 84% Floodplain swamp and bottomland forest Potential recreation activities could include kayaking and fishing FEE SIMPLE *0 kbN jkTub® N S 155.5 -acre project composed of 5 parcels Originally nominated in Period 1, but recently reclassified as a willing seller. Currently zoned as RM -6 Multiple -Family Residential District (up to 6 units/acre) Approximately 151 acres of suitable gopher tortoise habitat Both the scrub and mixed hardwoods are diminishing resources in this portion of IRC The data shows there is occupied scrub -jay habitat in proximity to this site; therefore, the potential for scrub - jay habitat restoration exists Adjacent to Kiwanis Hobart Park & Sandridge Golf Course; IRC Fairgrounds and Hobart Ballfields nearby; and opportunities for nature trails and wildlife viewing FEE SIMPLE —5.9 -acre project composed of two parcels Multiple structures on site (per the owner): Paul Kroegel's original home; Early 1900s caretaker home; 1-2 barns Majority of the property mature oaks with open understory; adjacent to IRL Current zoning is Multiple -Family Residential District (RM -6) Adjacent to the Kroegel Homestead Conservation Area Coastal hammock and portions of the historic midden could be protected while providing public land-based access to the IRL FEE SIMPLE NOW Nv4 YNQ NeGnorial Park —2.8 -acre project composed of one parcel purchased by Joel F Wynne. The development concept was to build a 96 - room hotel. Two previous structures that appear to have been removed Adjacent to the IRL; Existing pier that could be used for fishing and educational programming with six boat slips Appears that the majority of the vegetation has been cleared from the site Potential for listed fish and sea turtle species to utilize the shoreline habitat FEE SIMPLE W#M "aTrI"S —2.75 acres on the west bank of the IRL, northwest of Wabasso Bridge and north of 510 Current zoning is RM -6 Multifamily Residential District Parcel contained a portion of the historic Two Dollar Bluff Midden Fishing, boating, and the potential to educate the public on the indigenous people who inhabited the site FEE SIMPLE ITQUh �iTik0iiNt& —26.2 -acres that includes multiple barns, packing house, and 1961 home Directly west of IRC Fairgrounds Zoned Agricultural 0.66 acres of Marshes Majority of site was previously citrus and/or strawberries Owners state there are at least 5 active gopher tortoise burrows on site Potential future recreation may include hiking trails, wildlife viewing, and environmental programming available at IRC Fairgrounds FEE SIMPLE IAA i(T 10* s —11.34 acres of unmanaged sand pine scrub By east of I-95, south of Hwy 60 off 90th Ave Mixture of scrub and mixed wetland hardwoods Zoned Agricultural Potential gopher tortoise habitat Potential for hiking and wildlife viewing FEE SIMPLE W V,JgJYM c�IWE;Tortoise Single 0.22 -acre residential lot in Vero Lake Estates Remnant concrete slab on the property that the Florida gopher tortoises are burrowing under RANKING MEETING SALA" ELAP quorum was present for the ranking meeting Staff presented the summary ranking table to the ELAP General discussion from ELAP members on their rankings and scores in comparison with the sammary table ELAP members approved ranked list presented and determined the Tiers ELAP approved a motion to recommend the BOCC adopt the ranked and tiered list of projects and direct staff to pursue discussion with land owners of Tier 1 properties e ff ffi 9013 d t 0 tv�- RANKING MEETING SALA" ELAP quorum was present for the ranking meeting Staff presented the summary ranking table to the ELAP General discussion from ELAP members on their rankings and scores in comparison with the sammary table ELAP members approved ranked list presented and determined the Tiers ELAP approved a motion to recommend the BOCC adopt the ranked and tiered list of projects and direct staff to pursue discussion with land owners of Tier 1 properties NOMINATION B 0 C C R �Si�Ff0srcM`ErNuDtATIt oolid of R County J C!'ommissioners approve the + attached ELAP Fina, Ranking and Tiered List of Nominations. Staff further requests that the Board authorize staff to pursue Tier 1 Ranked Properties for acquisition consistent with the Environmental +I► Lands Acquisition Panel's recommendation including the authority to make conditional offers of purchase and sale subject to approval by the Board of County Commissioners in accordance with Florida Statute Section 125.355. Parks, Recreation & Conservation ENVIRONMENTAL LANDS ACQUISITION PROGRAM Recommendations from the Environmental Lands . . . . . . Acquistion Panel NOMINATION ROUND 2 & 3 IRC Board of County Commissioners November 18th, 2025 Beth Powell - PRC Director 772-226-1780 Wendy Swindell - PRC Asst. Director Ln N O N C crW m W O V O x F— F— Z W W W CC Q (D Z_ Q Z IJ d C) O m J H w z Z cc w U- 0 cc C/) O .d OIL N o N o N o Q 0000 4 Z c c Doo o .O G O r C O P E 0 0 N 0 N O N O N O O N N N N QL ti t� "t 00 m ' z Q Q O o O U 0 r 0 r r r U � m� L 0 OS LQ C C O CD La � U m M L a 00 O O O C o 0 0 0 0 0 w � w L N Lf) 00 Lo CO 00 060- v- N LD qr-- N O 60} Efl 604 ff3 T- U � N_ _� U N cn v -2_ w Cco •� 0 co ti (n +r 0 L` a � = � CU � C � � U Cow a� m V m cu //��� (D Qi L L a t L oT�2�On- C: � E: _ CLL N O N 0) N e - C O U U m a> Lal Indian River County, Florida *ioA MEMORANDUM File ID: 25-1077 TO: THROUGH: THROUGH: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: BACKGROUND Type: Department Staff Report The Honorable Board of County Commissioners John A. Titkanich, Jr., County Administrator 13, /4.Z. Indian River County Administration Complex 1801 27th Street Vero Beach, Florida 32960 indiandver.gov Meeting Date: 11/18/2025 Michael C. Zito, Deputy County Administrator Beth Powell, Parks, Recreation, & Conservation Director Wendy Swindell, Parks, Recreation & Conservation Assistant Director October 31, 2025 ELAP Ranking List of Environmental Lands Acquisition Properties for Nomination Periods 2 & 3 On March 8, 2022, the County Administrator provided the Indian River County Board of County Commissioners ("BCC") with a proposed resolution authorizing an Environmental Land Bond Referendum for the November 8, 2022, ballot. Resolution 2022-016 was passed by majority vote. The Resolution calls for a Bond Referendum Election for the issuance of general obligation bonds as follows: ❑ To acquire and permanently preserve environmentally significant lands to restore the Indian River Lagoon, protect water resources, natural areas, wildlife habitat, drinking water resources, and construct public access improvements related thereto, shall Indian River County be authorized to issue general obligation bonds up to $50,000,000, maturing within 20 years from each issuance, not exceeding the legal maximum interest rate, payable from ad valorem taxes, with full public disclosure of all spending through annual independent audits? On December 12, 2023, the BCC approved the Environmental Lands Program Guide (ELP Guide). The Guide is the primary document that contains policies, standards, and procedures relating to environmentally significant land acquisition and management activities. One of the procedures outlined in the ELP Guide is the establishment of a group responsible for reviewing and ranking nominated parcels. The BCC established the Environmental Land Acquisition Panel (ELAP) as a nine -member group to review information provided during the application process and provide recommendations to the BCC regarding the prioritization of the acquisition of environmentally sensitive lands. The ELAP held its initial meeting in August of 2023 and continues to meet monthly. ANALYSIS The County's environmental bond process allows the public to nominate properties for acquisition at any time during the year. The first nomination period began on March 1, 2024 and closed on August 31, 2024. Each Indian River County, Florida Page 1 of 3 Printed on 11/13/2025 pu q*61.egistarRI nomination period is six months, at which time that period closes and nominated properties are ranked by the ELAP. The close of the second nomination period was February 28, 2025. Due to the low number of new nominations, the ELAP decided to combine the ranking process for nomination periods 2 and 3, and rank these projects together at the October 21, 2025 ELAP meeting. Throughout the process, staff and consultants have reached out to landowners to determine which parcels had owners wanting to have their property considered for acquisition through the environmental bond process ("willing sellers"). Parcels nominated by owners, and agents for owners, are considered as having willing sellers. Owners of parcels nominated by the public were contacted via letter, email and telephone to determine whether the owner was a willing seller. The second and third nomination periods identified ten nominations with willing sellers. All nominations were submitted as "fee simple" nominations whereby the County purchases the property outright. The ELP Guide outlines the process for how individual projects are to be ranked by the ELAP. The ranking process includes a scoring matrix with ten weighted evaluation factors relating to ecological factors and purchase factors. The scoring matrix is to be completed by each of the nine ELAP members and provided to staff in preparation for the designated ranking meeting. The September 16, 2025, meeting of the ELAP included a presentation by staff providing an overview of the ten willing seller nominations. Following this meeting, the ELAP members completed their scoring and provided their scoring sheets to staff. Staff assembled the ELAP nomination scores and produced a summary of the scoring to be presented to the October 21, 2025 ranking meeting. At the October 21, 2025, meeting of the ELAP the cumulative scores for each nominated project were presented in a table. After review and discussion of the project scores, the ELAP developed a ranked list of projects. It should be noted that the ELAP included projects that were designated as Tier 2 and Tier 3 in nomination period 1 into the October 21, 2025 ranking list. The negotiations for Tier 1 properties in nomination period 1 have been completed; either sale agreements were successfully negotiated with owners, properties were withdrawn by the owner, or negotiations failed to establish an agreed upon purchase price. For reference, the tiering of the nominations reflects that Tier 1 properties would be the first group of nominations prioritized for potential acquisition. Tier 2 and Tier 3 nominations would be pursued once the Tier 1 nominations have moved through the process. Table 1 provides the approved project ranking list developed at the October 21, 2025, ELAP meeting. BUDGETARY IMPACT There are no operational or expense funding requirements associated with this item. PREVIOUS BOARD ACTIONS 20-1630 06/09/2020 Letter to BCC Re: 2020 Environmental Lands Bond Referendum and Trust for Public Land Report 22-0043 02/01/2022 Presentation from Ken Grudens, Executive Director, Indian River Land Trust, Re: Proposed 2022 Environmental Land Bond Referendum 22-0091 02/01/2022 Proposed 2022 Environmental Land Bond Referendum 22-0194 03/08/2022 Environmental Land Bond Referendum 22-0803 09/20/2022 Updated Draft Environmental Lands Program Guide for the November 2022 Environmental Land Bond Referendum 23-0202 03/07/2023 Indian River County Environmental Bond - Review Committee Selection Process 23-0264 03/28/2023 District #3 Appointee to the Environmental Lands Acquisition Panel (ELAP) Indian River County, Florida Page 2 of 3 Printed on 11/13/2025 pow" Legistarl" 23-0288 04/04/2023 District 4 Appointment to Environmental Lands Acquisition Panel (ELAP) 23-0403 05/16/2023 Appointment of James L. Connaughton ELAP 23-0492 06/06/2023 District #3 Appointee to the Environmental Lands Acquisition Panel (ELAP) 23-0626 07/11/2023 Environmental Lands Acquisition Panel (ELAP) 23-0875 09/26/2023 Award of RFP 2023064 for Ecological Services in Support of the Environmental Land Acquisition Bond Process 23-1155 02/06/2024 Environmental Land Bond - Introduction to the ArcGIS Hub/Dashboard 23-1057 12/12/2023 Environmental Lands Acquisition Panel (ELAP) Recommendation for Finalization of Draft Environmental Lands Program (ELP) Guide 25-0193 02/25/2025 ELAP - District 4 Appointee - Member Resignation & Appointment 25-0319 03/11/2025 ELAP Ranking List of Environmental Lands Acquisition Properties for the Initial Nomination Period 25-0475 04/22/2025 Water & Air Research, Inc. Work Order Number 1, Amendment 2 for Ecological Services in Support of the Environmental Land Acquisition Board 25-0921 09/23/2025 Environmental Lands Acquisition Status Update Regarding a Purchase Contract - Durrance Place 25-0922 09/23/2025 Environmental Lands Acquisition Status Update Regarding a Purchase Contract - Hale Grove Properties 25-0946 10/07/2025 Consideration of a Sale Agreement for the Purchase of the 21.89 acre Hale Grove site through the Environmental Lands Acquisition Bond 25-1002 10/21/2025 Environmental Lands Acquisition Status Update Regarding a Purchase Contract - Jungle Trail Island Club Manor 25-1010 10/21/2025 Environmental Lands Acquisition Status Update Regarding a Purchase Contract - Winter Beach 73rd 25-1056 11/04/2025 Consideration of a Sale Agreement for the Purchase of the 19.6 acre Jungle Trail Island Club Manor site through the Environmental Lands Acquisition Bond POTENTIAL FUTURE BOARD ACTIONS Consideration of Tier 1 nominated property purchase agreements. STRATEGIC PLAN ALIGNMENT Quality of Life OTHER PLAN ALIGNMENT N/A STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff respectfully request that the Board of County Commissioners approve the attached ELAP Final Ranking and Tiered List of Nominations and authorize staff to pursue Tier 1 Ranked Properties for acquisition consistent with the Environmental Lands Acquisition Panel's recommendation. Indian River County, Florida Page 3 of 3 Printed on 11/13/2025 pow "t L.egistar"l Table 1 ELAP Meeting October 21, 2025 Willing Seller Ranking List For BCC Review Property Name Nomination Period Final Score Ranking Tier Sebastian South Prong Linus 2 7212 1 1 12300 - Archie Carr 3 6903 2 1 Blue Cypress Lake Shoreline 2 6436 3 1 Hobart Scrub 3 6247 4 1 Indian River Dr 3 6129 5 1 1 Foster Road 1 5044 angle Trail Fischer 4957 Sebastian Riverview 1 4639 6 2 Lousiana Ave 1 4549 7 2 Beachside Lane 1 4504 8 2 Joel F Wynne Memorial Park 3 4449 9 2 Two Dollar Bluff 2 4260 10 2 Countryside Citrus 3 4201 11 2 Blythewold 11 Acres 3 3934 12 3 Atlantic Ave 1 3432 13 3 Bent Pine Golf Club 1 2652 14 3 66th Ave Pasture 1 2089 15 3 103rd Court Gopher Tortoise 3 719 16 3 COLOR DESIGNATIONS: TIER 1 PROPERTIES UNSUCCESSFUL NEGOTIATION - OWNER OFFER NOT CONSISTENT WITH APPRAISALS OWNER REMOVED PROPERTY FROM CONSIDERATION TIER 2 PROPERTIES TIER 3 PROPERTIES 489 Indian River County, Florida * s MEMORANDUM �OR104' File ID: 25-0987 )4A 4 Indian River County Administration Complex 1801 27th Street Vero Beach, Florida 32960 indianriver.gov Type: Attorneys Matters Meeting Date: 11/18/2025 TO: Board of County Commissioners THROUGH: John A. Titkanich, Jr., County Administrator THROUGH: Jennifer W. Shuler, County Attorney FROM: Christina Moore, C.Psy.D., Sr. Paralegal DATE: November 3, 2025 SUBJECT: Indian River County Committees - Annual Member Reappointments for 2026 BACKGROUND On December 3, 2024, the Board reappointed the County Attorney's Office to monitor member terms of certain committees. Resolution 2011-072 sets out the following duties of the committee monitor: (1) contact all board appointed committee members whose terms will expire and determine whether those members want to be considered for reappointment, (2) present to the Board a list of all committee members requesting reappointment - at which time the Board will reappoint members from the list as it deems appropriate, and (3) create a list of committee vacancies and post them on the County website. The County Attorney's Office has contacted committee members whose term will expire. Attached to this memorandum is a list of those members who have requested reappointment. The Board should now review the list and make such reappointments as it deems appropriate. It should be noted that in addition to those committee members not seeking reappointment, there are many existing vacancies. A list of the anticipated vacancies is attached for informational purposes. BUDGETARY IMPACT There is no cost to the County associated with this request. STAFF RECOMMENDATION The County Attorney recommends that the Board consider the list of committee members requesting reappointment and reappoint such members as the Board deems appropriate. Indian River County, Florida Page 1 of 1 Printed on 11/13/2025 pow"by Legistar" COMMITTEE MEMBER TERM RENEWAL FOR 2026 Committee Members who have terms that are due to expire in January 2026 who wish to have their term renewed. 1. AFFORDABLE HOUSING ADVISORY COMMITTEE 2 -Year Term — No Indian River County Residency Required o Kenneth "Chip" Landers — Not -for -Profit Provider of Affordable Housing o Linda Morgan -Citizen residing within jurisdiction of local governing body making the appointments 2. AGRICULTURE ADVISORY COMMITTEE 2 -Year Term — Indian River County Residency Required o Robert Adair, Jr. - Associated Industry Representative o Steve DeVos — Actively Involved in Agricultural Industry Representative o Ruben Koch - Actively Involved in Agricultural Industry Representative o Charlotte Tripson - Actively Involved in Agritourism Industry Representative 3. BEACH AND SHORE PRESERVATION ADVISORY COMMITTEE 2 -Year Term — Indian River County Residency Required. o David Cox - BCC Appointee o Francisco J. San Miguel — BCC Appointee 4. CITIZEN OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE 4 -Year Term — Indian River County Residency Required. o Linda Morgan — IRC Appointee 5. CODE ENFORCEMENT BOARD 3 -Year Term — Indian River County Residency Required. o Frank (Pete) Clements — General Contractor o James A. Kordiak — Member At Large o David Myers, H — Business Person 6. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT (CDBG): CITIZEN ADVISORY TASK FORCE (CATF) - 4 -Year Term — Indian River County Residency Required. No Term Limitations. o Ardra Rigby — IRC Appointee October 31, 2025 - 1 491 7. CONSTRUCTION BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT AND APPEALS 3 -Year (Staggered) Term — No Indian River County Residency Required o Kathryn Casano-Radeckie — General Public o William Schuh — General Public o Jason Short — Engineer 9. PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION 4 -Year Term — Indian River County Residency Required. No Term Limitations. o Kenneth "Chip" Landers — Alternate Member October 31, 2025 - 2 492 INFORMATIONAL ONLY (Updated) Previously Vacant or Committee Members who have terms that are due to expire in January 2026, who decided not to respond, renew their term or resigned (does not include district specific appointments, and existing vacancies). • AGRICULTURE ADVISORY COMMITTEE - 2 -year term, unless otherwise noted. No Residency Requirement. o Actively Involved in Agricultural Industry Representative — Gerald "Jerry" Renick (resigned due to relocation) • COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT (CDBG): CITIZEN ADVISORY TASK FORCE (CATF) - 4 -year term, County Residency Required. o Citizen of Indian River County with Low to Moderate Income — Teddy Floyd (nonresponsive to reapply email) o Citizen of Indian River County with Low to Moderate Income — William Mosley (nonresponsive to reapply email) • ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL - 4 -Year Term - Indian River County Residency Required. o Indian River State College Representative — Annabelle Robertson - (nonresponsive to reapply email) October 31, 2025 - 1 493 Indian River County Boards & Commissions Submit Date: Oct 01, 2025 Profile Kenneth "chip" Landers First Name Middle Last Name Initial chip@chiplanders.com _ _....._ - - Email Address _ .. .: 1815 71st Ave Street Address Suite or Apt Vero Beach FL 32966 City state Postai Code Mobile: (772) 473-7888 Primary Phone Alternate Phone Berkshire Hathaway Florida Realty Broker -Associate Employer Job Title Which Boards would you like to apply for? AHAC - Affordable Housing Advisory Committee: Submitted How long have you been a resident of Indian River County? 50 years Are you a full-time or part-time resident? Select one. W Full Time Please list current employer or businesses. If retired, please list any business experience that may be applicable to the committee. Berkshire Hathaway Florida Realty (formerly Norris and Compay) Please list any licenses you presently hold: Florida Real Estate Please list any organization of which you are currently a member: TCBA - Treasure Coast Builders Association RAIRC - Real Estate Association of Indian River County Please list any other committees or boards you currently sit on: IRC Planning and Zoning Commission q. Interests & Experiences 494 Kenneth "chip" Landers s Why are you interested in serving on a board or commission? To provide my experience in real estate and building to assist the public and provide a balanced viewpoint regarding possible development and rezonings. To assist buyers obtain the American dream of owning their own home. Resume - Ken neth—Ch ip—Landers.ndf Upload a Resume Demographics Race (Used for State Reporting) V Caucasian Do you have a government recognized disability? (Used for State reporting information) 0Yes r No 495 Kenneth "chip" Landers Kenneth A. "Chip" Landers, Jr. Family: Oldest of 10 children (5 adopted) of Kenneth and Laura Landers Married: 1985 Doris 1. Inman -Landers (Teacher),'2 Children; Amanda.and Kenneth Education: Vero Beach mgh School log. -1 University .of Florida may 1985 Major- Real Estate Employment: BHH9F[orld3i:Realty(Norria&;Company) 11/2009 - Present Veto Beach, FL poker - Associate Coldwell Bauker Ed S'chlitt, LC 312009 4112009 Vero Beach, FL Broker Associate The Professionals Realty, LLC 6( 20©3 — 3/2009 Vero. Beach, FL Broker— Owner ColdwelLBanker Ed. Schli% LC 5/99-r 6/2003 Vero. Beach, FL New Horne Division Various Builders & Developers 5/1985 — 51/1=999 Vero Beach, Orlando grid Gainesville, FL General Manager, Sales Manager Community bivolvemeiit: Realtors Association of Indian River County Realtor of The Year 2013 and 2007, President 2003, nstructor Ethics section for new .member Orientation: (2006 -present), Governmat Mia'. Treasurer,: MLS. Treasure Coast Sunders Aswiatiou NEW RiVer County Chapter Chairperson (1:9-9-3,1994), Board of Directors (:1993.1999, 2002.) 1€R Chanthbr of Commerce LupoetrFee Committee Vero Reach Indian River County Chamber of Commerce SR 60 Truk Force Indian River County Affordable Housing, Committee City of Vero Beach Downtown Ad. Hoc Committee Adder: 1440 Bunker Ct Vero Beach, F13296r6. Contactarrfarmation,; Telephone: 772-473 708.8: (Mob1 ) Email: chip@ghiplanders.com Indian River County Boards & Commissions Submit Date: Oct 07, 2025 Profile Linda Ann Morgan First Name Middle Last Name Initial brittt4@gmail.com Email Address 3990 45th pl Street Address suite or Apt Vero Beach FL 32967 Clty State Postal Code Mobile: (772) 501-9387 Mobile: (772) 501-9387 Primary Phone Alternate Phone Nurses Touch Home Health Aide _ Employer Job Title Which Boards would you like to apply for? AHAC - Affordable Housing Advisory Committee: Submitted How long have you been a resident of Indian River County? 57 - Are you a full-time or part-time resident? Select one. W Full Time Please list current employer or businesses. If retired, please list any business experience that may be applicable to the committee. America In Homecare Please list any licenses you presently hold: CNA/HHA Please list any organization of which you are currently a member: Progressive Civic League NAACP Gifford Cemetery Please list any other committees or boards you currently sit on: Progressive Civic League; School District Oversight Committee; Affordable Housing Advisory Committee; MLK Jr. Birthday Committee; Juvenile Justice Circuit 19 Interests & Experiences 497 Linda Ann Morgan i i :Why. are you interested in serving on a board or commission So that I can serve in helping and making all Commnities aware Application - Resume Linda Morgan.pdf Upload a Resume Demographics Race (Used for State Reporting) Pj African-American Do you have a government recognized disability? (Used for State reporting Information) 4 Yes o No 'I 498 Linda Ann Morgan Linda Morgan Vero Beach, FL 32967 brittt4ggmall.com - 7725633295 or 772-453-5516 1 am interested in wot'king for a company to grow with, I have many skills, 1 am dependable and also'I have dependable transportation, I will work almost any hours., Willing to relocate to: Tampa, FL > Orlando, FL - Broward, FI Authorized to work-in the US,for any employer WORK EXPERIENCE. Receptionist/Tax Preparer TAX USA GROUP - Vero Beach, FL - April 2014 to December 2014 Greeted customers, data, entry, filing, printed checks, answered busy phones, some tax preparatlons. Clerical Support donadio & associates - Vero Beach, FL - June 2014 to July 2014 Answered phones and filing, mall correspondence. CSR/Examiner TAX COLLECTORS OFFICE - Vero Beach, FL - September 2013 to February 2014 Renewed licenses, registrations; cities, data entry, property taxes, road testing Administrative Assistant Habitat For Humanity - Vero Beach, FL - July 2013 to January 2014 Screened clients, set appointments, PowerPoint, conducted orientations, processed applications, made calls to applicants. Caregiver/Companion Southeast leasing personnel - Vero Beach, FL - February 2010 to September 2013 Assisted with personal care, showers, dressing, prepared Ilght meais, light cleaning, shopping and transporting, escorted client on trips, also assisted with activitles. Sales Associate Macys - Vero Beach, FL - October 2009 to December 2009 Assisted customers with sates, straightening merchandise, opened and closed register, Inventory. Receptionist/PBX Operator Janie Bean Chevrolet - Vero Beach, FL - October 1997 to October 2006 Greeted customers, answered busy switchboard, some cashiering, processed tags, data entry. EDUCATION Home Health Aide red cross - Vero Beach, FL 2002 to 2002 499 business administration florida memorial college - Miami, FL 119831:61985 vera beach senior high school -. Vero Beach, FL 19B1 to 1983 SKILLS excel (2 years), microsoft word (4 years), powerpoint (Less than 1 year), Into rvlewing/Screening (2 years), Orientations (3 years), busy switchboard'(8 years), Internet and soclatmedla maneuvering and info for Community (5 years) CERTIFICATIONS Home Health Aide April 2002 to Present Personal care, light cleaning, assisting client with dressing, prepares light meals, transporting to and from appts, shopping. GROUPS Progressive Civic League February 2012 to Present Community Activist C.O.P.E March 2012 to Present Secretary, citizens sharing concerns In the Community. 99th circuit board of Juvenile Justice/ parent of a youth April 2014 to. Present Making decisions on behalf of the Juvenile justice system. 500 Indian River County Boards & Commissions Submit Date: Oct 07, 2025 Profile Robert Jr. C. Adair First me Middle Last Name Initial bob@flaresearch.com Email Address 7055 33rd Street Street Address Suite or Apt Vero Beach FIL 32966 city state Postal Code Business: (772) 562-3802 Mobile: (772) 473-7991 Primary Phone Alternate Phone Florida Research Center for Agricultural Sustainability, Inc. Executive Director Employer lob Title Which Boards would you like to apply for? AAC - Agriculture Advisory Committee: Submitted How long have you been a resident of Indian River County? 39 years Are you a full-time or part-time resident? Select one. W Full Time Please list current employer or businesses. If retired, please list any business experience that may be applicable to the committee. Mr. Adair is the Executive Director and President for the Florida Research Center for Agricultural Sustainability for 21 years and is the owner of Adair Citrus Acres a citrus grove for 39 Years. Please list any licenses you presently hold: Florida Dept of Agriculture certified Commercial Pesticide Applicators license. Univ. of Fla.certified training in Citrus IPM, BMPs, HLB and Citrus Canker. Please list any organization of which you are currently a member: Wedgworth Leadership Institute for Agriculture and Natural Resources Alumni Association Florida Natural Resources Leadership Institute Association of Fellows Florida and Indian River County Farm Bureaus 501 Robert Jr. C. Adair Please list any other committees or boards you currently sit on: ----------------- Advisory Committee member for the Indian River Research & Education Center, Ft. Pierce, FL. Chairman (2018 -Present). Elected Official- Supervisor and Chairman 1998 -Present, Indian River Soil and Water Conservation District. Interests & Experiences Why are you interested in serving on a board or commission? I believe that an active and viable agriculture is one of the keys to the quality of life in Indian River County. To that end, I want to do all that I can to empower a sustainable and diverse agricultural industry from aquaculture to agro tourism for the County's 182,000 acres of agricultural land and each of the 450 farms. Now more than ever our County's citrus groves are facing a grave risk from citrus greening disease (HLB), a devastating bacterial disease for which there is no known cure. Likewise I feel compelled to help provide guidance to conserve both our County's and State's valuable water resources for agricultural, domestic, recreational, and environmental uses. I possess a professional knowledge of Florida citrus management and conservation practices. As an agricultural research scientist and grower for 39 years, I have developed and field-tested a suite of sustainable agricultural practices that are both economically and environmentally efficient for citrus. I have 47 years of farming experience that includes citrus, peaches, cattle, forage and wheat farming. This experience gives me a deep understanding of the numerous challenges that face our County's farmers each day. RESUME CRDF Nutrition Trial.ndf Upload a Resume Demographics Race (Used for State Reporting) W Caucasian Do you have a government recognized disability? (Used for State reporting information) o Yes a. No 502 Robert Jr. C. Adair RESUME Robert C. Adair, Jr. Mr. Adair is the Executive Director and President for the Florida Research Center for Agricultural Sustainability, Inc. (F1aRes) which was established in December 2003. F1aRes is a private, nonprofit agricultural research and education organization that is a leader in developing and promoting sustainable agricultural practices. Mr. Adair has an extensive background in agricultural research and sustainable agriculture as well as experience in citrus production, biochemistry and farming. His diverse background has proven most useful in the development of the Sustainable Citrus Program (SCP), an integrated agricultural system utilizing a combination of Best Management Practices (BMPs) and Integrated Pest Management (IPM) methods in conjunction with sustainable agricultural practices tested and developed at FlaRes. Formerly he served as the Citrus Coordinator for 707 acres of citrus groves using the SCP at the U.S. Fish & Wildlife's Merritt Island National Wildlife Refuge in Titusville, Florida. His research projects have been funded by the USDA, Florida's Dept. of Community Affairs, University of Florida, U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service, Florida Citrus Production Research Advisory Council, CRDF, IR - 4 Biopesticide and Organic Support Program and from the private industry sector. He has published numerous scientific papers and has developed: a sustainable citrus program, low -rate herbicide program, two citrus BMPs, and patented biorational pesticide products for citrus. He is a frequent speaker at grower meetings for Florida's citrus industry and community. Mr. Adair is actively involved in leadership roles with several agricultural organizations and serves on numerous agricultural related boards. Professional Awards, Offices, and Activities: Chairman (2005-2012), Indian River County Agriculture Advisory Committee, 2003- Present. Florida State Horticultural Society, Board Member -at -large. 2013-2018. Elected Official- Supervisor and Vice -Chairman 2011 -Present, Indian River Soil and Water Conservation District. Supervisor from January 1998 -Present. Appointed to Fla. Dept. of Ag. & Consumer Services' Fertilizer Technical Council, 2011-2013. Recipient of the 1995 and 2010 President's Industry Award presented by the Florida State Horticultural Society. Recipient of the Florida State Horticultural Society's "Best Paper in the Citrus Section 2009" for a paper entitled "Demonstration of a Sustainable Approach to Citriculture within a National Wildlife Refuge in the Indian River Area" published in Vol. 122 of the Proceedings of the Florida State Horticultural Society, June 4, 2010, Crystal River, FL. Pertinent Publications and Presentations: 1. Adair, R. C., Jr. Metalized Reflective Mulch: More Fruit with Less Psyllids. 2018 Florida Citrus Industry Annual Conference, June 14, 2018, Bonita Springs, FL. 2. Adair, R. C., Jr. Metalized Reflective Mulch- Planting to Harvest in < 3 Years. 2017 Florida Citrus Show, 26 January 2017, Fenn Center, Fort Pierce, FL. 503 Pertinent Publications and Presentations (continued): 3. Cicero Joseph M., M. M. Adair, R. C. Adair, Jr., W. B. Hunter, P. B. Avery, and R. F. Mizzel 11I, 2017. Predatory behavior of long legged flies (Diptera: Dolichopodidae) and their potential negative effects on the biological control agent of the Asian citrus psyllid (Hemiptera: Liviidae). Fla. Entomol. 100(2): 485-487. 4. Ozores-Hampton, Monica, Robert Adair and Phil Stansly. 2015. Using compost in citrus. Citrus Industry, Dec. 2015: 8-11. 5. Adair, R.C., B. A. Norquist, and G. K. Ross. 2009. Demonstration of a Sustainable Approach to Citriculture Within a National Wildlife Refuge in the Indian River Area. Fla. St. Hort. Soc. 122: 90-107. 6. Hall, D. G., M. G. Hentz, and R. C. Adair, Jr. 2008. Population Ecology and Phenology of Diaphorina citri (Hemiptera: Psyllidae) in Two Florida Citrus Groves. Quanitative Ecol., 37(4), 914-924. 7. Graham, J. H., K. D. Bowman, D. B. Bright, and R. C. Adair, Jr. 2007. Screening citrus rootstock genotypes for tolerance to Phytophthora-Diaprepes under field conditions. Fla. St. Hort. Soc. 120: 97-102. 8. Ross, G. K. And R. C. Adair, Jr. 2006. Visual Presentation of the Spatiotemporal Aspects of Diaprepes Root Weevil Emergence in a Small East Coast Citrus Grove From 2000- 2003. Fla. St. Hort. Soc., 119: 100-106. 9. Graham, J.H., L. W. Duncan, C. W. McCoy, and R. C. Adair. Rootstock Management of the Phytophthora-Diaprepes (PD) Complex is Site Specific. Diaprepes Task Force Annual Research Meeting, 15 May 2005, SW Florida REC, Immokalee, FL. 10. Bowman, K. D., J. H. Graham, R. C. Adair. 2003. Young Tree Growth in a Flatwoods Rootstock Trial With Diaprepes Weevil and Phytophthora Diseases. Proc. Fla. State Hort. Soc. 116: 249-251. 11. Adair Jr., R. C. May 2001. Phytotoxicity of KTS © , N -Sure© , and 435 Spray Oil on Two Varieties of Citrus for Tessenderlo Kerley, Inc. 12. Adair Jr., R. C. Dec. 2004, "Foliar Fertilization, Some Benefits for Citrus", Douglass Fertilizer & Chemical, Inc. Citrus Foliar Conference, Winter Haven & Lake Placid 13. Adair Jr., R. C. March 2003, "Foliar Fertilization of Citrus with Two Phosphorus Compounds", Foliar Nutrients, Inc., Cairo, GA. 14. Adair Jr., R. C. Jan. 2001, "The Compatibility of Monopotassium Phosphate with Some Citrus Spray Materials", LidoChem, Inc., Hazlet, NJ. 504 Indian River County Boards & Commissions Submit Date: Oct 07, 2025 Profile Steve C De Vos First Name Middle Last Name - - Initial sdevos@sebastianriverfarms.com Email Address - 113_3_0 S. Indian River Drive #5 Street Address Suite or Apt Sebastian FL 32958 CRY State Postal Code Home: (515) 401-5339 Primary Phone Alternate Phone Hammond Groves Inc Senior Business Manager Employer job Title Which Boards would you like to apply for? AAC - Agriculture Advisory Committee: Submitted How long have you been a resident of Indian River County? 11 month Are you a full-time or part-time resident? Select one. W Full Time Please list current employer or businesses. If retired, please list any business experience that may be applicable to the committee. Serving as Senior Business Manager of Hammond Groves, Inc. and other Hammond owned businesses in FL below: Sebastian River Farms, LLC (Indian River County) Perkins Nursery, LLC (Hendry County) Hammond Rock and Sand Mine, LLC (Indian River County) Please list any licenses you presently hold: None - Please list any organization of which you are currently a member: None Please list any other committees or boards you currently sit on: None 505 Steve C De Vos Interests & Experiences Why are you interested in serving on a board or commission? With 20 years of energy consulting experience, I have worked closely with agribusiness owners, utilities and commercial/industrial stakeholders to deliver sustainable and economically viable projects. My background includes navigating regulatory landscapes, aligning priorities and implementing solutions that balance productivity and growth. This experience positions me to bring a results -driven, collaborative approach ensuring local initiatives benefit from our commitment to the community's future. We have been fortunate to travel the last several years and look forward to giving back to this community where our closest friends and families have called this home the last several years. De )Jos Cover Letter and Resume.pdf Upload a Resume Demographics Race (Used for State Reporting) W Caucasian Do you have a government recognized disability? (Used for State reporting information) r Yes r No 506 Steve C De Vos August 11, 2025 Dear Board / Commission, I am writing to you with interest in a role with the Agricultural Advisory Committee and/or Economic Development Council (EDC). I am a servant leader with a passion for making informed decisions with positive outcomes for our community. Below are some results of my work: In Des Moines Iowa: I led the creation of a plan for an investor-owned utility to identify and engage apartment units and agribusinesses with an energy conservation message. As a result, we served 50,000 apartments and 500 agribusinesses over a 5 -year period resulting in $5m in savings and a reduction of 50GW of energy usage. In parallel to this project plan, I led the launch of a Department of Energy funded City Energy Management program that identified over $1m in energy savings annually across 18 cities throughout the state. In San Antonio Texas: my team processed 10,000 energy efficiency rebates per year for one of the largest municipal owned utilities in the country resulting in $5m in incentives being paid back to rate payers. In Jacksonville Florida: I worked closely with JEA to launch 4 new energy programs including residential, solar, water conservation and low-income weatherization. This work resulted in hundreds of thousands of gallons of water being conserved. In Tucson Arizona: I worked closely with HR and Tucson Electric Power to launch a portfolio of energy conservation programs including efficient homes, weatherization, trade ally, commercial and industrial. In Vero Beach Florida: I have standardized operating procedures for a wholesale nursery/citrus operation. In addition, I have worked closely with USDA and FDACS to secure >$im in funding for conservation, sustainability, marketing and disaster relief initiatives for our operations. These experiences will translate well to your group. I will be able to quickly connect with peers and work collaboratively to identify opportunities with specific actions where required. Keeping people informed, being inclusive and listening to the needs of our community will ensure we maintain a high level of engagement and trust resulting in an exceptional experience for the communities we serve. I look forward to discussing this further should you feel I am the right fit. Steve C. De Vos 507 Education Western Iowa Tech Community College I Sioux City, IA Business Management Relevant coursework: Human Resources, Business Law, Principals of Accounting and Leadership. Experience Senior Business Manager I Hammond Groves, INC. I Vero Beach, FL September 2024 - Present Steve C. De Vos • Manage $10m P&L spread across multiple entities. • Negotiate vendor contracts and manage vendor relationships • Provide daily cash flow reports to CEO. SENIOR BUSINESS • Provide support to sales team identifying trends and budget targets. • Provide Admin oversight ensuring on time filing of IRS forms. MANAGER • Ensure compliance with USDA, FDACS, DEP and county. • Lead conservation and grant funding opportunities. Implement performance metrics and incentive programs. CONTACT • Maintain positive workplace culture focused on safety and team. 11330 S. Indian River Dr. #5 Senior Program Manager I Franklin Energy, LLC I FL, AZ, TX and IA Sebastian, FL 32958 515.401.5339 July 2014 - September 2024 stevecraigdevos@gmail.com • Managed $10m P&L spread across multiple states. • Developed and communicated program strategic direction to the SKILLS team. • Provided various reports to utility partners for regulatory • Goal development compliance. • Cost management • Provided oversight and process review to maintain SOC II • Scope development Compliance. • Client engagement • Facilitated launch of software platform to improve reporting. • Relationship management • Provided directions to Marketing for executing community • Networking engagement. • Root cause analysis • Project coordination Business and Operations Developer I Anemometry Specialists I Alta, IA April 2007 -July 2014 LEADERSHIP • Developed and implemented standard operating procedures I received the "Sustainability resulting in improved efficiency, consistency and accountability Award" in 2024 from Franklin • Provided wind/solar resource assessment documentation review. Energy which is provided to 1 of • Coordinated projects in 36 states and 4 countries resulting in >$3b 1,200 employees annuallywhile at and >3,000 MW of energy spend and generation. Franklin Energy. • Facilitated Master Service Agreement with the world's largest renewable energy developer. 508 References Jason Wille I CTO I Aeroflow Healthcare 303-870-7559. Chad Kloberdanz I CEO I Kloberdanz AG Energy Consulting 515-333-8461 Bridgid Lutz I Environmental Stewardship Lead I Capital Group 630-310-7253 Joe VanDam I Sales/Operations Executive (retired) I Dell 512-897-7758 509 Indian River County Boards & Commissions Submit Date: Oct 03, 2025 Profile Ruben - A. Koch First Name Middle Last Name Initial rukochocomcast.net Email Address - 5745 36th Place Street Address Suite or Apt Vero Beach FL 32966 City State - Postal Code Business: (772) 562-7227 Home: (772) 569-9618 Primary Phone Alternate Phone Irrigation Irrigation Consultants Designer/Consultant Unlimited.Inc. Manager_„ ____,________ Employer lob Title Which Boards would you like to apply for? AAC - Agriculture Advisory Committee: Submitted How long have you been a resident of Indian :.River County? . 41 Years Are you a full-time or part-time resident? Select one. 17, Full Time Please list current employer or businesses. If retired, please list any business experience that may be applicable to the committee. Irrigation Consultants Unlimited, Inc. Please list any licenses you presently hold: Florida Well drilling license, sprinkler/irrigation license for Indian River County plus other counties, and Florida commercial landscape maintenance pesticide license _ . Please list any organization of which you are currently a member: Indian River Chamber of Commerce Florida Nursery and Growers and Landscape Association Irrigation Association National Ground Water Association Florida Association of Environmental Soil Scientists Please list any other committees or boards you currently sit on: .510 Ruben A. Koch 511 Ruben A. Koch u tben Koch Home. 5745 36th Place Work: Vem Beach, Florida 32966 (772)569-9618 ralockgz. meastmet Ounlifications 125 43'd Avenue Vero Beach, FL 32948 (772) 562-7227 Background includes 25 years of irrigation design and consulting. Multilingual; and technically proficient in Autocad 14, Adobe Photoshop, Pagemaker, and Illustrator, WCADI (irrigation design program), MS Excel, Word, Windows, and ArcGis. Work Experience Irrigation Consultants Unlimited, Inc. Nov 1984 to current Vero Beach, FL Irrigation Resigner/Cou ItanittManager • Designed irrigation systems for agricultural industry in excess of 30,000 acres in the state of Florida. • Supervised construction of individual irrigation projects many valued in the excess of $2,000,000,00 • Designed/built commercial pump and $leer systems individually valued over $55,000.00. • Consulted for indiividualprojects n vi*e11 and pmnp low valued over $200;000.00 • Designed multiple landscape irrigation projects for schools, house and commercial developments. • Managed office and installation staff of 20 enmployeea. Education Master of Science Currently enrolled in a Professional Environmental Science Program with a specialty in soil and water University of Florida, Gainesville, FL Bachelor of Science August 2007 With a major in Horticultural Science University of Florida, Gainesville, FL Graduated Cum Laude Relevant Coursework e Environmental Plant Id o Integrated Pest Management o Soil & Nutrient Management o Plant Propagation Previous Overseas College Degrees • Soil & Water Engineering • Citricultnre 512 Activities Member of • Irrigation Association • Florida Landscape acrd NurseryGrort :Association • Man River Chamber of Commaive Licenses • Florida Water Well Drilling • Sprinkler/irrigation License for ,Indon Rimer Cwwyow odwWwam Certifications from the Irrigation Association • Irrigation Designer • Irrigation Auditor • Irrigation Contractor I I 513 Indian River County Boards & Commissions Submit Date: Oct 01, 2025 Profile Charlotte A Tripson First Name Middle Last Name Initial charlottetripson@gmail.com Email Address 5020 12th St. Street Address Suite or Apt Vero Beach FL 32966 City state Pascal Cods Home: (772) 643-8859 Primary Phone Alternate Phone Waldo's Secret Garden Owner Employer Job Title Which Boards would you like to apply for? AAC - Agriculture Advisory Committee: Submitted � I How long have you been a resident of Indian River County. 35 years Are you a full-time or part-time resident? Select one. W Full Time Please list current employer or businesses. If retired, please list any business experience that may be applicable to the committee. Waldo's Secret Garden Event Venue Please list any licenses you presently hold: None Please list any organization of which you are currently a member: None Please list any other committees or boards you currently sit on: None Interests & Experiences - - - - .514 - Charlotte A Tripson 515 Charlotte A Tripson CHARLOTTE GRAPHIC & WEB DESIGNER T R I P S O N charlottetripson@gmail.com 772.643.8859 PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE WALDO'S SECRET GARDEN EVENT VENUE MARKING DIRECTOR I OWNER (2011 -PRESENT SCHEDULING AND PLANING EVENTS COORDINATING AND ORGANIZING VENDORS EXECUTING PROMOTIONAL MARKETING STRATEGIES CHARLOTTE ANABAR DESIGNS CREATIVE DIRECTOR I OWNER 2011 -PRESENT GRAPHIC AND WEB DESIGN DIGITAL MARKETING PRINT AND DIGITAL ADVERTISEMENT LOGOS AND BRANDING SOCIAL MEDIA DESIGN PROFICIENCIES LOGO & BRAND IDENTITY DESIGN, LAYOUTS AND FORMATTING, PHOTO RE -TOUCHING, TYPOGRAPHY, WEB DESIGN, FACEBOOK MANAGER, E-MAIL CAMPAIGNS, PREPARING FILES FOR PRINT AND WEB, MARKETING MATERIALS, SOCIAL MEDIA TECHNICAL SKILLS MAC, PC, ADOBE SUITE (ILLUSTRATOR, PHOTOSHOP, INDESIGN) GOOGLE DOCS, E-MAIL MARKETING AND WEB DESIGN PLATFORMS VOLUNTEER EXPERIENCE MAIN STREET VERO BEACH BOARD MEMBER 1 2014-2015 ORCHID ISLAND MANOR ACTIVITY COORDINATOR I Summer 2011 Environmental Learning Center Annual Chairty Gala 1 2010-2011 BACHELOR OF ARTS I THE UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL FLORIDA I MAJOR: DIGITAL MEDIA Indian River County Boards & Commissions Submit Date: Oct 01, 2025 Profile David L. Cox First Name Middle Last Name Initial coxecology@gmail.com Email Address - - 9495 Periwinkle Drive I Street Address Suite or Apt Vero Beach FL 32963 City State Postal Code Home: (772) 766-2074 Mobile: (772) 766-2074 Primary Phone _ Altemake Phone David Cox Consulting, LLC CEO Employer lob Title Which Boards would you like to apply for? BSPAC - Beach & Shore Preservation Advisory Committee: Submitted How long have you been a resident of Indian River County? 30 Are you a full-time or part-time resident? Select one. V Full Time Please list current employer or businesses. If retired, please list any business experience that may be applicable to the committee. David Cox Consulting, LLC Cox Pinson Environmental, LLC Please list any licenses you presently hold: PhD., Certified Senior Ecologist Ecological Society of America Please list any organization of which you are currently a member: Audubon Florida Board, Pelican Island Audubon Society, Pelican Island Conservation Society, American Association for Advancement of Science, Ecological Society of America, British Ecological Society, Sigma Xi Please list any other committees or boards you currently sit on: Indian River Soil & Water Conservation District, Indian River Lagoon Council/IRL NEP STEM . Advisory Committee, Local Rule Review Committee Chairman - IRC/FWC David L. Cox Interests & Experiences Why are you interested in serving on a board or commission? I live near the beach, and have been a marine biologist for many, many years. 518 David L. Cox GOALS SERVICES DAVID COX DAVID COX CONSULTING, LLC 2044141 AVENUE, SUITE 24 VERO BEACH, FLORIDA 32960 • Apply ecological knowledge to policy and management decisions • Promote a thoughtful public today and educate future generations to apply the best available science • environmental site assessment, land planning, permitting & listed species surveys • natural lands management, habitat assessment & ecological restoration • conservation land acquisition & public access planning • science -based land development ordinances • design, implementation & management of independent research, over 45 peer-reviewed scientific publications, plus numerous reports and studies • successful grant preparation &. administration, including budgets • advocacy in the public interest and public communication • experience in education at all levels "K -postgraduate" SELECT CLIENTS • U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service, Office of Ecological Services • Harvard University, Arnold Arboretum, Boston, MA • Friends of Bee Gum Point, Town of Indian River Shores, FL • Kamehameha Schools, Kailua-Kona, Hawaii • South Florida Water Management District, W. Palm Beach, FL: • Environmental Learning Center, Vero Beach, FL • Indian River Land Trust, Vero Beach, FL • Gracewood Incorporated, Vero Beach, FL • Graves Brothers Company, Vero Beach, FL • Indian River County School District, Vero Beach, FL • Indian River Habitat for Humanity, Vero Beach, FL • Envirovet Institute, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL • John's Island Water Management, Inc., Town of Indian River Shores, FL • Greenwood Development Corporation, Liberty Hill, SC 519 EXPERIENCE Since 2010 Senior Ecologist, HydroPlan, LLC Since 2000 Principal, David Cox Consulting, LLC Certified Senior Ecologist, Ecological Society of America 1998-1999 Associate Professor, Florida Institute of Technology, Melbourne, FL 1997-1998 Naturalist, Environmental Leaming Center, Vero Beach, FL 1994-1996 Sr. Research Fellow, USF/Shriners Hospital, Tampa, FL 1987-1994 Asst. Professor, Dept. of Biology, University of Oregon, EDUCATION Postdoc University of Oxford, Animal Ecology Research Group Ph.D. Washington University, Population Biology & Ecology B.A. Washington University, Biology & Chemistry Vanderbilt University TEACHING I have taught a variety of courses spanning science and the humanities (environmental science, molecular biology, ecology, physiology, the human relation to nature, history of biology, marine biology, and others). I have taught at scholarly institutions (Washington University, Vassar College, University of Oregon, Florida Institute of Technology), nature centers, and public as well as private elementary and secondary schools. SELECTED AFFILIATIONS Ecological Society of America, British Ecological Society, International Association for Ecology, American Association for the Advancement of Science 520 Eugene, OR 1986-1987 Senior Scientist, College of Marine Studies, University of Delaware, Lewes, DE 1983-1986 Asst. Professor, Department of Biology, Vassar College 1982-1994 Senior Scientist, Mount Desert Island Biological Labs 1981-1983 Asst. Professor, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 1979-1980 NATO Fellow, University of Oxford, Oxford, England EDUCATION Postdoc University of Oxford, Animal Ecology Research Group Ph.D. Washington University, Population Biology & Ecology B.A. Washington University, Biology & Chemistry Vanderbilt University TEACHING I have taught a variety of courses spanning science and the humanities (environmental science, molecular biology, ecology, physiology, the human relation to nature, history of biology, marine biology, and others). I have taught at scholarly institutions (Washington University, Vassar College, University of Oregon, Florida Institute of Technology), nature centers, and public as well as private elementary and secondary schools. SELECTED AFFILIATIONS Ecological Society of America, British Ecological Society, International Association for Ecology, American Association for the Advancement of Science 520 PUBLICATIONS Cox, D.L., and Alexander, W. 2006. Traces: The Legacy of Indian River County, Volume 2. European Contact and Colonization. Vero Beach, FL: School District of Indian River County. Sexton, O.J., Bramble, J.E., Heisler, I.L., Phillips, C.A., and Cox, D.L. 2005. Eggshell composition of squamate reptiles: relationship between eggshell permeability and amino acid distribution. Journal of Chemical Ecology 31: 2391-2401. Cox, D.L. 2004. Pre -Drainage Everglades Landscapes and Hydrology: A Review. South Florida Water Management District: West Palm Beach, FL. Cox, D.L., and Alexander, W. 2003. Traces: The Legacy of Indian River County, Volume 1. Prehistory. Vero Beach, FL: School District of Indian River County. Cox, D.L., 2001. Science for Earth Stewards: K — 5 Science Curriculum. Vero Beach, FL: School District of Indian River County. Cox, D.L., 2001. An "Ecosystem" timeline: changing definitions in ecology, 1935-2000. A Web Project of the Institute for Cultural Landscape Studies, Harvard University. http://www.icls.harvard.edu/current.html Cox, D.L., 2000. Changing the Course of the Future: Earth Stewards Curriculum. Vero Beach, FL: School District of Indian River County. Cox, D.L., Walker, P. and Koob, T.J. 1999. Predation on eggs of the thorny skate. Transactions of American Fisheries Society 128:370-384. Smirnova, E. A., Cox, D. L. and Bajer, A. S. 1995. Antibody against phosphorylated proteins (MPM-2) recognizes mitotic microtubules in endosperm cells of higher plant Haemanthus. Cell Motility and the Cytoskeleton 31:34-44. Cox, D.L. 1994. What young biologists need to know. A review of The Right Tools for the Job. At Work in Twentieth -Century Life Sciences, Clarke, A. E. and Fujimura, J. H. (Editors). The Quarterly Review of Biology 69: 379-380. Cox, D.L. and Koob, T.J. 1993. Predation on elasmobranch eggs. Symposium on Reproduction and Development in Cartilaginous Fishes. In Environmental Biology of Fishes, 38: 117-125. Cox, D.L. and Koob, T.J. 1993. Solid-state catechol oxidase in skate (Raja erinacea) egg capsule. The Bulletin, Mount Desert Island Biological Laboratory, 32: 17-19 521 Koob, T.J. and Cox, D.L. 1993. Stabilization and sclerotization of Raja erinacea egg capsule proteins. Symposium on Reproduction and Development in Cartilaginous Fishes. In Environmental Biology of Fishes, 38: 151-157. Straus, J.W., Monian, C.L. and Cox, D.L. 1993. Nidamental gland catechol oxidase in the little skate (Raja erinacea): latency caused by an endogenous low molecular weight factor. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology 105B: 117-122. Straus, J.W., Rabidou, N.C., Bogdany, J.K. and Cox, D.L. 1993. Oxidative enzymes and the formation of egg capsules in the little skate (Raja erinacea). The Bulletin, Mount Desert Island Biological Laboratory, 32: 14-16. Straus, J.W. and Cox, D.L. 1992. Purification and characterization of cysteine proteinases from Tetrahymena thermophila. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology 97B: 641-653. Straus, J.W., Monian; C.L. and Cox, D.L. 1992. Catechol oxidase latency in nidamental gland extracts from the little skate (Raja erinacea). The Bulletin, Mount Desert Island Biological Laboratory, 31: 24-26. Straus, J.W., Monian, C.L. and Cox, D.L. 1992. Preparation and characterization of immobilized antipain and chymostatin for the isolation of proteolytic enzymes by affinity chromotography. The Bulletin, Mount Desert Island Biological Laboratory, 31: 20-23. Cox, D.L. and Rogers, B. 1992. A review of The History of Biology: A Selected, Annotated Bibliography. The Quarterly Review of Biology 67: 350-351. Cox, D.L. and Koob, T.J. 1991. Predation on eggs of the little skate (Raja erinacea) in the Gulf of Maine. The Bulletin, Mount Desert Island Biological Laboratory 30: 123- 124. Koob, T.J. and Cox, D.L. 1991. Skate (Raja erinacea) egg capsule proteins. The Bulletin, Mount Desert Island Biological Laboratory 30: 21-23. Straus, J.W. and Cox, D.L. 1991. Catechol oxidase in the little skate (Raja erinacea) shell gland: enzyme latency induced by an endogenous factor. The Bulletin, Mount Desert Island Biological Laboratory 30: 23-25. Cox, D.L. and Koob, T.J. 1990. Latent catechol oxidase in the little skate (Raja erinacea). Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology 95B: 767-771. 4 522 Koob, T.J. and Cox, D.L. 1990. Introduction and oxidation of catechols during the formation of the skate Raja erinacea egg capsule. Journal of the Marine Biological Association, U.K. 70: 395-411. Cox, D.L. and Koob, T.J. 1989. Studies on skate (Raja erinacea) egg capsule formation. IV. Catechol oxidase activation. The Bulletin, Mount Desert Island Biological Laboratory 28: 126. Koob, T.J. and Cox, D.L. 1989. Accumulation of calcium and magnesium in Raja erinacea egg capsule during formation and after oviposition. The Bulletin, Mount Desert Island Biological Laboratory 28: 124-126. Koob, T.J. and Cox, D.L. 1988. Egg capsule catechol oxidase in the little skate Raja erinacea Mitchill, 1825. The Biological Bulletin 75: 202-211. Cox, D. L., Mecham, R.P. and Koob, T.J. 1987. Site-specific variation in amino acid composition of skate egg capsule (Raja erinacea Mitchill 1825). Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 107: 71-74. Koob, T.J. and Cox, D.L. 1987. Raja erinacea egg capsule: a model for interactions of metals with membrane -bound quinones. The Bulletin, Mount Desert Island Biological Laboratory 27: 116-117. Koob, T.J. and Cox, D.L. 1986. Effects of salinity, pH and urea on shell gland catechol oxidase activity of the little skate (Raja erinacea). The Bulletin, Mount Desert Island Biological Laboratory 26: 113-116. Koob, T.J. and Cox, D. L. 1986. Studies on skate (Raja erinacea) egg capsule formation. II. Introduction of catechols occurs in utero. The Bulletin, Mount Desert Island Biological Laboratory 26: 109-112. Koob, T.J. and Cox, D.L. 1985. Shell gland catechol oxidase in the skate (Raja erinacea). The Bulletin, Mount Desert Island Biological Laboratory 25: 132-134. Cox, D.L., Koob, T.J., Mecham, R.P. and Sexton, O.J. 1984. External incubation alters the composition of squamate eggshells. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology 79B: 481-487. Koob, T.J. and Cox, D.L. 1984. Studies on skate (Raja erinacea) egg capsule formation. The Bulletin, Mount Desert Island Biological Laboratory 24:78-81. Cox, D.L. 1983. Chemical composition of Iguana iguana eggshell. Annual Report of the American Philosophical Society 1983: 147-148. 523 Campbell, E.J., Senior, R.M., McDonald, J.A. and Cox, D.L. 1982. Proteolysis by neutrophils: relative importance of cell -substrate contact and oxidative inactivation of proteinase inhibitors in vitro. Journal of Clinical Investigation 70: 845-852. Cox, D.L., Mecham, R.P. and Sexton, O.J. 1982. Lysine -derived cross-links are present in a non -elastin, proline -rich protein fraction of Iguana iguana eggshell. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology 72B: 619-623. Cox, D.L. 1980. The history of ecology: archives of the Ecological Society of America. Bulletin of the British Ecological Society XIM: 127-129. Cox, D.L. 1980. A note on the queer history of niche. Bulletin of the Ecological Society of America 61(4 ): 201-202. OTHER CREATIVE WORKS Cox, D.L., Grudens, K., and Stanbridge, R. 2006. St. Sebastian River Greenway Plan. Indian River County, FL. In partnership with Pelican Island Audubon Society, Friends of St. Sebastian River, Indian River County Historical Society, Indian River Land Trust, Sebastian River Area Chamber of Commerce, and the Division of Community Development and Planning, Indian River County. Cox, D.L., and Alexander, W. 2006. Traces: The Legacy of Indian River County, Volume II. European Contact and Colonization. Vero Beach, FL: School District of Indian River County. Ecker, D., Veron, B., Catchpole, J., Tripson, J. Baker, R. and Cox, D.L. 2006. Landscape Ordinances. Indian River County, FL. In partnership with Pelican Island Audubon Society, and the Division of Community Development and Planning, Indian River County. Cox, D.L. 2006. Regional Simulation Natural Systems Model: Peer Review for the South Florida Water Management District. Cox, D.L. and Stanbridge, R. 2005. The Trans -Florida Central Railroad. Rails -to - Trails Project, interpretive displays. Vero Beach, FL: Indian River County Parks Department and Indian River Historical Society. Cox, D.L. 2004. Pre -Drainage Everglades Landscapes and Hydrology: A Review. South Florida Water Management District: West Palm Beach, FL. Cox, D.L. 2004. The Native Way: Interpretive Trail. Vero Beach, FL: The Environmental Learning Center. 524 Cox, D.L. 2004. County Tree Protection Ordinance. Indian River County, FL. In partnership with Pelican Island Audubon Society, and the Division of Community Development and Planning, Indian River County. Cox, D.L., and Alexander, W. 2003. Traces: The Legacy of Indian River County, Volume I. Prehistory. Vero Beach, FL: School District of Indian River County. Cox, D.L. 2003. Master Interpretive Plan for Public Environmental Education Facilities. Vero Beach, FL: The Environmental Learning Center. Cox, D.L. 2003. Restoring Natural Plant Communities in the Lost Tree Islands Conservation Area. Vero Beach, FL: A Proposal in partnership with Indian River County, The Town of Indian River Shores, The City of Vero Beach, The Marine Resources Council, and Coastal Tech, Inc. Cox, D.L. 2002. Let's Do This Together. Video Script and Production. Vero Beach, FL: The Environmental Learning Center. Cox, D.L. 2002. Public Environmental Education Facilities and Boardwalk Extension. Vero Beach, FL: The Environmental Learning Center. Cox, D.L., 2001. Science for Earth Stewards: K — 5 Science Curriculum. Vero Beach, FL: School District of Indian River County. Cox, D.L., 2001_ An "Ecosystem" timeline: changing definitions in ecology, 1935- 2000. A Web Project of the Institute for Cultural Landscape Studies, Harvard University. http://www.icls.harvard.edu/current.html Cox, D.L., 2000. Changing the Course of the Future: Earth Stewards Curriculum. Vero Beach, FL: School District of Indian River County. Cox, D.L., 2000. The St. Sebastian River. Outdoor interpretive trail & panels. Vero Beach, FL: Indian River County Parks Department. Cox, D.L. and CM & Associates. 1999. Ecosystems of Florida Traveling Museum Exhibits. Prepared for The Environmental Learning Center, Vero Beach, FL. Cox, D.L., 1999. Pelican Island National Wildlife Refuge and the Indian River Lagoon. Public access and education project. City of Sebastian, FL. 7 525 Contact Dr. David L. Cox David Cox Consulting, LLC 2044 14`h Avenue, Suite 24 Vero Beach, Florida 32960 dlc@davidcoxconsulting.com 772.564.0540 phone/fax 772.766.2074 cell httl2://www.davidcoxconsulting.com Certified Senior Ecologist, Ecological Society of America Why are you interested in serving on a board or commission? I believe that my professional training, B. Sc. from MIT in Ocean Engineering and experience in the offshore marine industry, can help the Board reach informed decisions. San Miauel.ndf.... Upload a Resume 528 Francisco J. ("sammy") J San Miguel Page 1 oj6, Resume off. &w Miguel, 317110 Resume of Francisco J. San Miguel San Miguel Consulting 2250 Southwinds Blvd. Suite # 223 Vero Beach, FL 32963 Tel 772 2318809 Fax 772 23.18809 Email: sannanmi@alummit.edu Education Grammar School: Champagnat College, Havana, Cuba, 1949 High School: Senior Matriculation diploma, Regiopolis College, Kingston, Ontario, Canada, 1954 College; Bachelor of 'Science Naval Architecture and. Marine Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 1958 Postgraduate: courses' in Business Administration at Johns Hopkins University and the Louisiana State University System (Nicholls State University) leading to Master Business Administration degree, 1972 Numerous in-house management courses in public speaking, media relations, communication skills, quality management, negotiating techniques, etc. Attended seminars and summer courses in assignment related subjects such "MRP 11 for Top Management (resource planning) in Boston, Mass., the IBM Executive Management School in San Jose, CA, Shipbuilding Productivity courses at M.I.T.; Russian studies at the Arden House conferences sponsored by Harvard and Columbia Universities. Professional Member of the Society of Naval Architects and Marine Engineers (S.N.A.M.E.) since 1958 Former member of the Hull Structure Committee of S.N.A.M.E Former member of the Board of Directors of the REAPS (Research for Engineering and Production in Shipbuilding) group in Washington D.C. Personal Family: married to Frances McCammon since 1958, four children all, independently employed and living in the U.S.A. Health: excellent Birth date: January 18, 1936 Birth Place: Havana, Cuba Citizenship: U.S.A. since 1963 117/10 1 529 Page t of 6, Amme nfP. San hfiswl, 317110 Employment: 35 years of uninterrupted service with WDernilott.Internattonal and six years with Maryland Shipbuilding and Dry Dock Company; all in shipbuilding or offshore marine construction industries. I` joined McDermott as Naval Architect and Chief Engineer 'in 1964 and advanced through the next 35 years to Shipyard. Division Manager, Shipyard Vice President, Systems and Automation Vice President, General Manager and Vice President of Marketing and Business Development in the Former Soviet Union, Eastern Europe, Mexico and the Caspian �.... m*, ^. .., tea-.: �-xs� eld IdA7 iMg' - 911, Basin. IreiuelRin ;1999; aiid', have, beenacrive, in theconsalttn$ a �* offsho�� �tuetion;�compatties�in.�'hemerlcetin fofally r+oducts�an�`���rrnan �easibili studse5 References Excellent references, both U.S. and international, can be provided upon request and determination of mutual interest. Experience Technical Started career in the shipbuilding industry as Assistant Naval Architect in a major U.S. East Coast shipyard, Maryland Shipbuilding and Dry Dock Company (1958-62) in Baltimore, Maryland, performing Naval Architectural and Structural Calculations for both commercial and naval combatant vessels. During the first two years, I also estimated both repair and new construction work. A foreign assignment followed during which I assisted in the creation of the first ever Mexican -American Shipbuilding Joint Venture in Veracruz, Mexico as Assistant to the Technical Director, 1962-64. In this capacity, I was solely responsible for the staffing, organizing and management of the Purchasing, Engineering and Estimating Department. This included the implementation of the chart of accounts, cost controls, cost analysis, labor/material planning and scheduling in what was then a primitive business environment. Also negotiated labor contracts and taught native personnel the .elements of new construction contract negotiation. Yard grew from a group of 30 to 2000 workers in two years, repaired a variety of ocean going ships, designed and built several barges and supply vessels. Shipyard Management Returning to the USA, accepted a position in the newly established shipyard division of one of the foremost pioneers of the offshore marine construction industry, J. Ray McDermott & Co where I played a major role in the growth of that business over,a period of twenty years. Starting as Chief'Engineer and Naval Architect responsible for New Construction, two vessels per year and 200 employees, rose through several management levels to the position of Vice President and General Manager of a three yard shipyard group (1200 workers and,20 vessels per year) specializing in the construction of medium size vessels engaged in sea going and coastal 31'/30 530 Page 3 of 6, Reomm of F. Sax Miguel, 317/10 trades as well as offshore oil and gas exploration and production (1964-84). During those years the shipyard group established an unblemished reputation for quality construction and on time delivery while at the same time consistently outperforming its sister divisions in profitability, innovation, and productivity enhancing management techniques - specifically, largely due to my efforts, we were the second shipyard in the,U.S. to introduce in 1972 computer controlled cutting of steel ship parts in.the production of medium size vessels. Software Systems Development In 1984, 1 transferred to headquarters and directed a company wide effort to develop and integrate the technical and business -software systems of the entire offshore marine construction group of McDermott International. Concurrently, I directed the automation of its fabrication facilities (1984-85) and oversaw the first implementation of the CADCAM software systems as well as supervised the selection of the hardware platform configuration to deliver the products in-house. These software systems and automation tools contributed strongly to the survival of the company's engineering and fabrication entities through the very tough competitive environment of the eighties and nineties. Between 1985 and 1988, I initiated a worldwide marketing effort of the in-house developed CADCAM systems and establishing McDermott's first efforts to penetrate the deepwater floating production/extended well test systems. I performed extensive global market survey of the economic feasibility of commercializing these two segments of the offshore business and recommended a business plan that resulted in significant profit contribution from two major projects. Simultaneously, I carried out preliminary business development efforts in the Soviet Union for on -shore petrochemical/offshore marine construction market. Marketing and Business Development As a result of these marketing efforts, I was asked to establish McDermott's fust business office in Moscow and accelerate the company's business development efforts in the USSR. During those years I was responsible for the initial development phases of the Sakhalin II project, the first of that country's offshore marine construction projects to reach field production. McDermott's equity interest in this project was sold in 1997 to Marathon OR Company and Shell Oil Company, the present day operator. The project is now in its full, development phase. During the course of my residence in the USSR, I established excellent working relations with the various energy ministries and participated in the joint venture negotiations that led to the successful completion of several major projects. In particular, I was primarily responsible far establishing the company's presence in Azerbaijan where, with Amoco as partners, we obtained the exclusive negotiating rights to the development of the Azeri Field offshore project in an open international competition in 1991. During that year and the following year, I negotiated the first protocols of intent and joint ventures with Shelfproekstroi and Kasmorneftegas for the joint operation of its fabrication and shipyard facilities. "The Azeri field was consolidated during its negotiating phase into the Azeri Chirag Guneshli (ACG) Field, presently in its full development phase by Azerbaijan International Operating Company (AIOC). The sale of McDermott's equity 117/10 531 Pana 4 of6, Baume of F. SotMlgud 34/10 in the ACG and Sakhalin H oil fields in 1997 made -a significant contnbotfon, to the bottom line of 'the company. In 1995, after the Sakhalin H. project and the Azeri projects were well underway, I transfewed'to Mexico to market the services of McDermott's latest shipyard acquisition in Veracruz,, establish an engineering joint venture as well as oversee and liaise with our Joint Venture partner, one of the largest Mexican offshore contractors, working in the development of offshore projects -in -the Mexican continental shelf. ,inn o 4 532 Page S of 6, R=Te ofF. San Miguel, 317110 During that same period of time, I initiated and carried through to completion the marketing effort leading to the company's first project offshore Kazakhstan. In 1999 OKIOC, the consortium of international operating companies developing the Kashagan field awarded our company its first offshore construction project, the installation of a system of piles at its first two drilling locations in that field. This project was carried out as a joint venture project between various operating entities of SOLAR, the State Oil Company of Azerbaijan Republic, and McDermott Middle East, In Russia, I participated for about -two years in a project to help Vyborg Shipyard, Vyborg, Russia enter the international shipbuilding market. While working with, their marketing department I advised them in the restructuring of their ship construction estimating system. In Spain, I advised Dragados, a major Spanish fabricator of offshore structures, on the preparation of a proposal for the construction of offshore jack up rigs. In 2007 and 2008, in Mexico, .I assisted Talleres Navales del Golfo, (TNG) Veracruz, Mexico in their efforts to re enter the ship building field after ten years of specializing solely in offshore fabrication under their former owners, J. Ray McDermott & :Co., TNG. Is a wholly owned subsidiary of Hutchinson Port Holdings, one of the largest ports operating companies in the world. More recently I performed a feasibility study to determine the profitability of building a floating dry dock in Alvarado, Mexico, for the repairs of ships engaged in supporting the offshore oil fields in the Mexican sector of the Gulf of Mexico. Page 6nj6, Resuinegff San A igue4 3/7/10 Qualifications Knowledge of the International Marine Construction, Shipbuilding, and Oil and Gas Industry • Worked with world leader in this field, McDermott International, for thirty five years. • MIT B.Sc. degree in Naval Architecture & Marine Engineering • Master of Business Administration from the L.S.0 system. Ability to Maximize Stockholder's Return on Investment • Consistently achieved best Return on Investment in the entire company while in the Shipyard Group • Major projects developed and new markets opened under my direction added significantly to shareholder value and will assure future continued high performance. Multinational Background • Multinational education in Cuba, Canada and the USA • Working exposure to many cultures through various assignments in the USA,. Mexico, Europe, Russia, Middle East and Eurasia Technical, Production and Management ShM • Company Ieader in the implementation of technological innovations that resulted in significant increases in shipbuilding and offshore marine construction productivity. • Pioneered and developed markets in the former Soviet Union, Middle East, Central and Eastern Europe. • Played significant role in structuring and negotiating equity participation in multi million dollar oil and gas upstream projects in the Former.SovietUnion • Negotiated major contracts, joint ventures and strategic alliances worldwide. Language And Communication Skills • Fluent in Spanish and English • Conversational in French and, at one time, in Russian • Ability to communicate with and relate to labor, customers, peer management and high level government officials • Excellent presentation skills 3n/io I— 6 534- Indian River County Boards & Commissions Submit Date: Oct 07, 2025 Profile Linda: Ann Morgan First Name Middle Gest Name Initial brittt4@gmail.com Email Address - - - - 3990 45th pi Street Address Suite or Apt Vero Beach FL 32967 City State Postal Code Mobile: (772) 501-9387 Mobile: (772) 501-9387 Primary Phone Alternate Phone Nurses touch Home Health Aide Employer Job Title Which Boards would you like to apply for? COC - Citizen's Oversight Committee: Submitted Please list current employer or businesses. If retired, please list any business experience that may be applicable to the committee. America In Homecare Please list any licenses you presently hold: CNA/HHA Please list any organization of which you are currently a member: Progressive Civic League NAACP Gifford Cemetery Please list any other committees or boards you currently sit on: Progressive Civic League; School District Oversight Committee; Affordable Housing Advisory Committee; MLK Jr. Birthday Committee; Juvenile Justice Circuit 19 Interests & Experiences 535 Linda Ann Morgan Indian River County Boards & Commissions Submit Date: Oct 06, 2025 Profile Frank (pete) Clements First Name Middle Last Naive Initial pete@pinnacleconstruction.biz Email Address 1535 Covington Run Road SW Street Address .. Suite or Apt Vero Beach FL 32968 City . state Postal Code Business: (772) 794-1330 Mobile: (772) 538-6033 Primary Phone Alternate Phone Pinnacle Construction of the Treasure Coast LLC. owner - Employer Job Tide . Which Boards would you like to apply for? CEB - Code Enforcement Board: Submitted How long have you been a resident of Indian River County? 54 years Are you a full-time or part-time resident? Select one. W Full Time Please list current employer or businesses. If retired, please list any business:. experience that may be applicable to the committee. Pinnacle Construction of the Treasure Coast, LLC. 37 years experience as a Florida Licensed General Contractor. Please list any licenses you presently hold: CGC1508560, CGC031792 Please list any organization of which you are currently a member: Why are you interested in serving on a board or commission? Enjoy serving the community. Feel my 37 years of local construction experience and interaction with IRC Community Development departments over the many years is of value to the rest of the board members and the public. 538 Frank (pete) Clements Consultation & Expert Witness Services Curriculum Vitae For F.M. "Pete" Clements Contact Info: 780 8th Court, Suite 3, Vero Beach, Fl. (Cell) 772-538-6033 (Off.) 772-794-1330 (Fax.) 772-794-1338 Email: Pete@pinnacleconstruction.biz www.pinnacleconstruction.biz 539 Frank M. 'Pete' Clements III Curriculum Vitae Objective: To our services to include general contracting, consultation and expert witness services utilizing my 37 years of Construction Management expertise. Construction Experience: My experiences lie in Project Management where, over a 37 -year period, I have been responsible for projects from conception thru completion. Specifically, pre -construction services, budgeting/estimating, contract negotiation, project procurement, construction phase, and project closeout. Commercial experiences include condominiums, car dealership, golf club houses, churches, office/retail, tenant fit -outs, contractor trades/warehouses, educational facilities, etc. Residential experiences include numerous high-end custom single-family residences in developments in Indian River County such as John's Island, Windsor, Bermuda Bay, The Anchor (Moorings), The Shores, etc. See attached project history. General Contracting Experience: • See attached project history at end of this CV. Expert Testimony & Lawsuit Experience: • Southern -Owners Insurance Company v. Wentworth Construction Company, et al, U.S. Southern District of Florida Case # 9:15-CV-80789-kam -Client was the Plaintiff insurance company. -This case is still ongoing. In this case, I was disclosed as an expert and my Affidavit was filed in support of their motion for Summary Judgment, which remains pending. • Watermark Construction, L.P. v. Appache Stucco, Inc. /Southern -Owners Insurance Company. U.S. Middle District of Florida Case #8:17-cv-01187-JSM-JSS - Client was a defendant / Counterclaim Plaintiff. - I was retained as a consulting expert. I was never disclosed as an expert because the case settled. Client was satisfied with how the case settled. • Southern- Owners Insurance Company v. Gateway Drywall, Inc., et al., Indian River County Case # 2016 -CA -000818- we were the Plaintiff. - Retained as a consulting expert. This case settled. Client satisfied with how it settled. 7808 th Court, Suite 3, Vero Beach, FI. 32962 www.pinnacleconstruction.biz Off: 772-7941330 Fax: 772-794-1338 Lic. # CGC 1508560 540 • Southern -Owners Insurance Company v. Miami Builders G.C. et. al, U.S Southern District of Florida case #1:18-cv-21514- we were the Plaintiff. - Retained as a consulting expert. This case settled. Client satisfied with how it settled. • Christopher House vs. Acline Consulting, Inc., Indian River County Case # 19-009729RLD. Retained as an expert witness in the area of building construction. The case was regarding a work comp claim on a construction site. - Client was satisfied with outcome. Judge Dietz accepted as expert in field. • Bialosky vs. Navo Builders & Southern Cross, Indian River County Case # 31 -2014 -CA - 000928. This was a material defect/product failure case. I was retained to put a monetary value towards rectifying the problem with the house. - This case settled and did not go to court. - Client was satisfied with how case settled. - Services Provided: Forensic cost estimating Owner's Rep Experience: • Raffi Alaverdian, Pleasantville Assisted Living —10730 US Hwy 1 Sebastian FL. This was a consult position on behalf of an out-of-town owner building a 30,000 sqft three story assisted living facility. Legal References: • Law Office of Olivia Devonmille, P.A. — Olivia Devonmille • Williams, Leininger, & Cosby, P.A. — Carri Leininger • Law Offices of Brennan & Kretschmer - Fred Kretschmer Affiliations: • Indian River County Code Enforcement Board, Current, past chairman. • Habitat for Humanity, Board of Directors,.9 years past active service. • Indian River County, Board of Building Appeals, Past Chairman. • City of Vero Beach, Board of Building Appeals, past. • Indian River County, Affordable Housing Advisory Committee, past. • Associated General Contractors, Treasure Coast Chapter, Carpentry Apprenticeship Committee, Chairman, past. • Associated General Contractors, Treasure Coast Chapter, AIA/Contractor Joint Committee, past. • Indian River County, Occupational License Tax Equity Study Committee, Chairman, past, appointed by County Commissioners. 780 81h Court, Suite 3, Vero Beach, FI. 32962 Off: 772-794-1330 Fax: 772-794-1338 www.pinnacleconstruction.biz Lic. # CGC 1508560 541 Education: • University of North Florida, Bachelors Degree, Building Construction. • University of Florida, Associates Degree, emphasis in Architecture & Building Construction. • University of North Florida's Continuing Education Contractor's exam course. • Associated General Contractor's Project Managers Course, Dallas, Texas. • Various Continuing Education Courses as required by the State of Florida's Dept. of Business & Professional Regulations. Licensing • State Certified General Contractor since 1985. • OSHA Construction Hazard Certification. 7808 th Court, Suite 3, Vero Beach, FI. 32962 Off: 772-794-1330 Fax: 772-794-1338 www.ainnacleconstruction.biz Lic. # CGC 1508560 542 PROJECT HISTORY — COMMERCIAL (up to $8.5 million project value) Proj ect: The Buggy Bunch Location: Vero Beach, Fl. Description: Total gut and renovation of an existing two story, 5,000sf per floor. Not for profit charitable organization. Project: Calvary Chapel Vero Beach Multipurpose building. Location: Vero Beach, Fl. Description: Total renovation their old 5,000sf sanctuary into a multi purpose space. Project: BCM Storage, LLC Location: Vero Beach, Fl. Description: A 30,000 sf pre-engineered metal storage facility. Project: Calvary Chapel of Vero Beach Sanctuary Location: Vero Beach, Fl. Description: Construction of a new 10,000 sf sanctuary on an occupied church campus. Project: SDIRC New Administration Complex Location: Vero Beach, Fl. Description: Development of a 10 acre parcel and the construction of a 35,000sf administration building for the School District of IBC's new offices. Project: Indian River Habitat for Humanity Restore Expansion Location: Vero Beach, Fl. Description: 10,000sf expansion of existing Retail Store with Site work, while store was open to public. 7808 1h Court, Suite 3, Vero Beach, FI. 32962 Off: 772-794-1330 Fax: 772-794-1338 www.ainnacleconstruction.biz Lic. # CGC 1508560 543 Project: SDIRC Fellsmere Elementary New Classroom Building and Kitchen/Cafeteria Location: Fellsmere, Fl. Description: Demolition and extensive site work, new two story classroom building and new kitchen/cafeteria comprising approx. 30,000sf. Project: Ace Hardware (Now the True Value Store) Location: Indian River County, Fl. Description: 16,800sf Retail Building, Including Extensive Site work. Project: North County Charter School Location: Indian River County, Fl. Description: 13,850sf Elementary School Facility, Including Extensive Site work Project: Christ Church Vero Beach Location: Vero Beach, Florida Description: Interior renovation/alteration to administration and child care areas. Project: Church of God by Faith Location: Wabasso, Florida Description: New construction of a detached fellowship hall. Project: The Mental Health Collaborative of IRC Location: Vero Beach, Florida Description: Interior renovation/alteration for their consultation offices. Project: SDIRC Glendale Elementary Location: Vero Beach, Florida Description: Demo & Full Remodel of Admin Office with new Single Point Entry Security Entrance. Project: Private Communities Registry, Inc. Location: Vero Beach, Florida Description: Interior renovation/alteration for their new office location. Project: SDIRC Gifford Middle School Repave & Athletic Fields Location: Vero Beach, Florida Description: Repave of Bus Loop & Teacher Parking, Construction of new Soccer/Lacrosse Field. Project: Christ Church- 923 Community Center Location: Vero Beach, Florida Description: Interior renovation/alteration for community outreach facility. 7808 th Court, Suite 3, Vero Beach, FI. 32962 Off: 772-794-1330 Fax: 772-794-1338 www.ainnacleconstruction.biz Lic. # CGC 1508560 544 Project: SDIRC & Simon Youth Foundation's Educational Resource Classroom Location: Indian River County, Fl. Description: Construction of the Educational Resource Classrooms and Office Facilities for at Risk Students. Project: SDIRC FLC Renovations to Drama, Chorus, Band & ROTC Rooms Location: Indian River County, Fl. Description: 7000sf Classroom Facilities Renovations. Project: Urgent Care Walk -In Clinic Location: Indian River County, Fl. Description: Medical Office Space for Lawnwood Regional Medical Center's Walk-in Clinic. Project: Indian River Habitat for Humanity- Operations & Training Center Location: Indian River County, Fl. Description: New 8,000sf Office building with extensive site work. Project: SDIRC- Sebastian River High School Concession Stand and Press Box Location: Sebastian, Fl. Description: 2 -Story Concession Stand/Press Box/Locker Room, Restrooms Building Project: SDIRC — Oslo Middle Schools Covered Hardcourt Location: Indian River County, Fl. Description: New Pre -Engineered Structural Steel Cover and Hard Court Improvements. Project: SDIRC — Beachland Elementary School Location: Vero Beach, Fl. Description: Construct Covered Walks, Parent Pick-up, Parking Lot Drainage Improvements, and Renovations to Gang Bathroom Facilities. Project: Chesnutt Commercial Plaza Location: Vero Beach, Fl. Description: 15,000sf Retail building with site work. Project: Indian River County Mosquito Control District Location: Vero Beach, Fl. Description: Construction of 4 New Buildings and Renovation of one existing. Project: Vista Royale Condominium Association- Maintenance Compound. Location: Indian River County, Fl. Description: Demolition of previous compound, setting up temporary compound, and then constructing new 4,000sf Pre -Engineered Metal Building, with offices and warehouse/shop and extensive site work. 7808 th Court, Suite 3, Vero Beach, FI. 32962 Off: 772-794-1330. Fax: 772-794-1338 www.ainnacieconstruction.biz Lic. # CGC 1508560 545 Project: Seald Sweet- Office Renovations Location: Indian River County, Fl. Description: Renovations and subdivision of existing office building along with ADA Compliance upgrades to restrooms and site. Project: Pro Sports Fitness Location: Sebastian, Florida Description: Tenant fit out of previously unimproved space for martial arts and fitness gym. Project: Hair Shop for Men Location: Indian River County, Fl. Description: Tenant fit out of previously unimproved space for barber shop. Project: Smoke Inn Location: Vero Beach, Fl. Description: Interior renovation for cigar shop. Project: SDIRC — FLC School Store Front Doors & Gym Doors Replacement Location: Indian River County, Fl. Description: Replacement of all Storefront Door Systems at Campus and Replacement of Exterior Doors at Gym. Project: SDIRC — Highlands Elementary Parent Pick Up & Staff Parking Lot Location: Indian River County, Fl. Description: Construct New Parent Pick Up Loop & Parking Areas with Storm Drainage. Project: Little Caesar's Pizza Location: Sebastian, Florida Description: Commercial Retail/Restaurant Tenant Fit Out. Project: Little Caesar's Pizza Location: Vero Beach, Fl. Description: Commercial Retail/Restaurant Tenant Fit Out. Project: SDIRC — Sebastian Middle School Location: Sebastian, Fl. Description: Restroom Refurbishing Project: SDIRC — FLC Generator Replacement Location: Indian River County, Fl. Description: Generator System Replacement Project: SDIRC- Oslo Middle School Soccer Fields 7808 1h Court, Suite 3, Vero Beach, FI. 32962 Off: 772-794-1330 Fax: 772-794-1338 www.pinnacieconstruction.biz Lic. # CGC 1508560 546 Location: Indian River County, Fl. Description: Construct Two New Soccer Fields with Irrigation. Project: SDIRC — Liberty Magnet School Location: Indian River County, Fl. Description: Storm Drainage Improvements and Roadway Improvements Project: Little Rising Star Location: Indian River County Description: Conversion of a Residential Property to a Commercial Daycare Facility Including Extensive Site Work, Paving, and Storm Drainage. Project: SDIRC — Pelican Island Elementary Location: Sebastian, Fl. Description: Multiple Restroom Renovations Project: SDIRC — Citrus Elementary Site Work Improvements Location: Indian River County, Fl. Description: Relocate Security Trailer/Residence, Remove Existing Property Entrance Drive Culverts and Replace with New. Project: SDIRC — Citrus Elementary ESE Bathroom Locations: Indian River County, Fl. Description: Construct a new ESE Bathroom Facility. Project: Unitarian Universalist Fellowship Church Location: Vero Beach, Fl. Description: Interior Construction of new preschool classrooms and office space. Project: Bobby's Arcade Location: Vero Beach, Fl. Description: Interior Tenant Fit Out, new construction Project: Kemp's Shoe Salon Location: Sewell's Point, Fl. Description: Expansion and Renovation of Retail Space Project: 40 Love Location: Vero Beach, Fl. Description: Interior Renovation of Retail Store. PROJECT HISTORY — RESIDENTIAL (up to $1.8million project value) Project: Davidson Residence Location: Gracewood, Vero Beach, Fl. 780 811 Court, Suite 3, Vero Beach, FI. 32962 Off: 772-794-1330 Fax: 772-794-1338 www.pinnacleconstruction.biz Lic. # CGC 1508560 547 Description: Custom Residence on the barrier island Project: McConvey Residence Addition Location: Moorings, Vero Beach, Fl. Description: Add second story to existing ocean front residence. Project: Keen Residence Addition/Renovation Location: Vero Beach, Florida Description: Major home renovation. Project: Seiz Residence Renovation Location: Moorings, Vero Beach, Fl. Description: Major whole house renovation Project: Mr. Peter Busch Location: River Ridge, Vero Beach, Florida Description: Remodeling/Renovations on a River Front Residence Project: Mr. Peter Busch Location: Cove Drive, Vero Beach, Florida Description: Remodeling/Renovations on a River Front Residence Project: Mr. Peter Busch Location: 4th Street, Vero Beach, Florida Description: Various Remodeling/Renovations/Addition Project: Clements Residence Location: Kings Lake, Winter Beach, FL Description: Custom Residence - Lot 31 and 17 780 8"' Court, Suite 3, Vero Beach, FI. 32962 Off: 772-794-1330 Fax: 772-794-1338 www.pinnacleconstruction.biz Lic. # CGC 1508560 548 Indian River County Boards & Commissions Submit Date: Oct 01, 2025 Profile )aures A. Kordiak First Name Middle Lest Name lnitlal jkordiak@comcast.net Email Address 255 11th Square, SW - Street Address Suite or Apt Vero Beach FIL 32962 city state Postal Code Home: (612) 747-0724 Primary Phone Alternate Phone Former Anoka County Retired Commissioner Employer Job Title Which Boards would you like to apply for? CEB Code Enforcement Board: Submitted How long have you been a resident of Indian River County?.. 7 years Are you a full-time or part-time resident? Select one. W Full Time Please list current employer or businesses. If retired, please list any business experience that may be applicable to the committee. Retired - Anoka County Commissioner Active community involvement Please list any licenses you presently hold: Past Real Estate Broker - 30 years Past Notary Public - 32 Years Please list any organization of which you are currently a member: VB Lions Club VB Chamber of Commerce IRC Chamber of Commerce St. Helens Knights of Columbus Keep Indian River Beautifult Board VB Kiwanis Why are you interested in serving on a board or commission? I have offered years of active community involvement Service to humanity is the best work of life. Resume - lames Kordiak.doc Upload a Resume James A. Kordiak Biography James A. Kordiak Retired PERSONAL: Age -68 Wife -Marilyn Children -Jeanette, Lisa, Laura Home -255 -11th Square SW Vero Beach, FL 32962 Education -U of M BA Degree Psychology Professional -Anoka County Probation Officer -Anoka County Commissioner (1986-1918) - Licensed Real Estate Broker - Property Management - Income Tax Preparation Church -St. Helen COMMUNITY SERVICE: Knights of Columbus -St. Helen Vero Beach Chamber of Commerce Lions Club- Vero Beach Keep Indian River Beautiful Board 3/6/19 551 Indian River County Boards & Commissions Submit Date: Oct 02, 2025 Profile David Myers. II First Name Middle Last Name - Initial dmyersandassociates@yahoo.com Email Address 5976 20th Street #232 street Address Suite or Apt Vero Beach FL 32966 City State Postal Code Business: (844) 362-2762 Mobile: (813) 391-5282 Primary Phone Alternate Phone David Myers & Associates Mortgage C_onsulti,ng,,------- Owner[Principal Fmployer _ - Job Title Which Boards would you like to apply for? CEB - Code Enforcement Board: Submitted How long have you been a resident of Indian.1tilver County?. 17 years 2008 Are you a full-time or part-time resident? Select. one. V Full Tlme Please list current employer or businesses. Wretired, please list any business experience that may be applicable to the committee. David Myers & Associates Mortgage Consulting - Owner/Principal Please list any licenses you presently hold: NMLS #1014694, G009828 and HH88131 Please list any organization of which you are currently a member: Alpha Phi Alpha Fraternity, Inc. Mentoring Families and Kids Bellwood Star Masonic Lodge Panhellenic Association Of The Treasure Coast Habitat for Humanity Neighborhood Revitalization Initiative Interests & Experiences Why are you interested in serving on a board or commission? I am a life long resident of Indian River county. My father served this county and cared about the it's residents and so do I. It's important to me that our county boards have representation of individuals who are Fair, Care and Understand the challenges which are faced by the members of these boards. I am a current member of the board, I understand the challenges of the board and would like to continue serving our county as a board member at the will and pleasure of our board of county commissioners. David Myers II Application j2df —_- r �,._ Upload a Resume Demographics Race (Used for State Reporting) W African-American Do you have a government recognized disability? (Used for State reporting information) - - 553 David Myers, li DAVID MYERS II 5976 201h Street, #232 Vero -Beach, -FL 32966 (813) 391-5282 DMyersandassociates@yahoo.com PRINCIPAL/OWNER. Providing mortgage consulting services in the following areas: Foreclosure Review Options Mortgage Retention Options Mortgage Liquidation Options Mortgage Modification Assistance Florida Hardest Hit..- PR/UMAP Homeowner Foreclosure Prevention/Retention Speaking Engagements CONSULTING SERVICES Engage, facilitate, and advise homeowners of available real estate solutions to resolve mortgage delinquencies. Implement and monitor the day-to-day resolution plan through the use of forbearance agreements, loan reinstatement, loan modification, short sales, deed in lieu, principal deferment and principle forgiveness of complex --problems through -document preparation. Evaluate, calculate, and formulate resolution plans. for each loan based on .lender and investor guidelines while analyzing homeowner financial and property statements. • Research loan history to identify loan status and prior activity; identify potential process issues- or gaps and report such issues to homeowner. • 'Manage the enforcement of homeowner rights including foreclosure, litigation, and negotiation. Timely follow up to all workflow calls (inbound and outbound), and resolution of loans in our portfolio. • Respond to routine Inquiries from homeowners, clients, attorney,.and court personnel. • Negotiate all aspects of resolution plan with clients and third parties. M DMyers & Associates Mortgage Consulting 15976 20th Street, #232, Vero Beach, Florida 32966 554 DAVID MYERS II 1599 Pointe West Drive Vero Beach, FL 32966 (813) 391-5282 davidm32968@yahoo.com SENIOR MORTGAGE UNDERWRITER Accomplished Senior Level Underwriter with a strong background in Mortgage Lending and Home Lending Modifications. Recognized as an experienced Mortgage Underwriter with knowledge of the Retail, Wholesale, Correspondent Lending and Due Diligence. In-depth knowledge of underwriting conventional, conforming, and non- conforming loans. Reputation for sound risk judgment and can do attitude. Thorough knowledge of'complex personal and business financial analysis and an expertise in tax return, CORE COMPETENCIES Automated, Manual& Due Diligence Underwriting Real Estate Values & Appraisal Analis Analytical/Declslon Making Skills Meet Target Deadlines Analyze Policies/Procedures/Guidelines Supervisory/Mentoring Skills Excellent Computer/Mathematical Skills Strong Verbal/Written Skills PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE UNDERWRITER AmeriNational Community Services, Inc.; Tampa, Florida (Contract Position) January 2014 to March 2014 • Underwrite,government programs including, Hardest Hit Fund (HHF). • Review submitted application packages for completeness prior to commencement of analysis. • Examine/review credit underwriting documentation, including applications, mortgages, notes, deeds, tax returns, bank statements, credit reports, asset, appraisals, AVM documentation and other information for accuracy and compliance with client underwriting guidelines to ensure borrower meets HHF guidelines. • Apply client guidelines and underwriting criteria during the application review process. • Communicate effectively with staff on issues with application, applicant and client submissions regarding interpretation of applicable underwriting criteria as it relates to submissions. • Prepare required review documentation and recommendation forsubmission to the client. • Adhere to timelines established based on client needs and departmental workflow_ • Provide rational in decisions made to approve or deny borrowers for state programs. • Utilize all systems in place, including automated underwriting to underwrite files in a timely manner. • Handle complex underwriting decisions requiring senior knowledge and/or unique problem solving abilities. •. Manage expected service levels related to decision and condition clearing. • Maintain knowledge of state and federal guidelines as it pertains to underwriting for the Hardest Hit Fund. SENIOR MORTGAGE UNDERWRITER Fifth Third Bank; Tampa, Florida (Remote Position) December 2012 to October 2013 • Responsible for underwriting conventional, portfolio loans, and FHA/VA loans. • Handled complex underwriting decisions requiring senior knowledge and/or unique problem solving abilities. • Managed expected service levels related to decision and condition clearing. • Updated information on processing and underwriting systems to verify, add, delete or waive conditions. • Contacted Loan Originators with the decision on the loan immediately after underwriting the file. • Ensured team follows determined workflow, thereby meeting service level agreements that have been identified. • Ensured team is providing a high level of customer service to internal and external customers. • Determined success rate of meeting certain benchmarks, and update required team performance reports. • Retrieved, reviewed, distributed, and discussed, reports related to the underwriting team. + Monitored compliance issues, including that all team members attend required meetings and that all staff are in compliance with state and federal regulations. • Provided feedback to other staff and loan officers. • Utilized all systems in place, including automated underwriting to underwrite files in a timely manner. • Demonstrated leadership skills as a team player by providing superior customer service, being flexible and approachable. 555 • Responsible for appropriate section of NMDA Worksheet. • Reviewed exception reports to ensure completion of all tasks. • Served as an intermediary for loan issues with the Regional Sales Managers. • Assisted in training new hires. • Maintained knowledge of Fifth Third Mortgage Company policies and procedures in addition to private investors, government investors and portfolio Credit Policy and Guidelines. SENIOR MEDIATION MODIFICATION UNDERWRITER JP Morgan Chase; Tampa, Florida January 2011 to October 2012 • Performed daily mediations via teleconference or in person as directedwith Opposing Counsel, JP Morgan Chase Attorneys, Mediators, Magistrates, Judges, and borrowers with defaulted mortgages for equitable solution to avoid foreclosure. • Trained and mentored less experienced underwriting staff on industry and company guidelines and helpful mediation tactics. • Reviewed, analyzed, approved, declined and manually underwrote large, unusual or complex individual consumer requests and products within company and industry guidelines to determine the feasibility of the borrower retention and liquidation options. • Strong knowledge of a wide range of loans that include Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, USDA, FHA, VA, Conventional, Sub -Prime, Prime, SRU Loans, HBU Loans, and Asset Loans. • Restructured and modified loss mitigation mortgages secured with residential property that qualify under the U.S. TreasuryDepartment Home Affordability Modification Program (RAMP, HAMP2, HAUP, HARP) by manually underwriting all loans. • Reviewed and verified financial statements, employment details, credit reports and applicable ratios (debt ratios, loan -to - value) of the applicant. • Reviewed appraisals and BPO's of the subject property and ran proprietary AVM to check the appropriate values of properties. • Structured and negotiated interest rates and fees. • Evaluated the risk of residential mortgage loans on a timely basis based on sound underwriting decisions. • Evaluated and'examined transactions to ensure accuracy and completeness. • Prepared formal reports for review; ensured that documents are. consistent and uphold to company, investor and industry guidelines. • Implemented fraud detection techniques by performing compliance reviews. • Contacted investors to gather information to make appropriate decisions. • Communicated and explained rationale behind decisions (approval or denial) to appropriate individuals within mediation, upheld fair lending practices of JP Morgan Chase, met targets of productivity, quality, and performed second review of contract underwritten approvals and denials from all areas. • Excellent verbal and written communication skillswith ability to meet deadlines in a timely manner. • Exceptional ability to analyze policies, procedures, and guidelines to maximize productivity and protect the level of rick desired. UNDERWRITER/DUE DILIGENCE UNDERWRITER American Mortgage Consultants (AMC) January 2002 to August 2006 • Managed and led underwriting teams of three to twelve to assist them in working efficiently and helping them learn to make decisions that balance the goals of the company. • Performed several analyses with special emphasis on fraud review and early payment defaults. • Reviewed loan application packages for completeness and accuracy. • Confirmed application information (1003) against other documents within the file: to validate employment verifications, income, assets, etc. Identify underwriting/data discrepancies and other diligence issues. • Verified and validated income, assets and liability documentation to support underwriting decision. • Calculated and verified income structure (employment verification, tax returns, divorce decree, alimony, etc), verified funds to close (verification of deposits, gift funds, IRA, 401K, sale of assets, etc). • Reviewed loans for compliance related items, i.e. TILA, ROR, and miscellaneous disclosures. • Reviewed and verified credit report (FICO pay history, debt validation), • Reviewed other real estate owned (i.e,, disposition of property, rental income). • Reviewed appraisals to support value, determine flipping, camps are reasonable, etc. • Familiar with fraud red flags and outside services used to determine or verify fraud. 556 • Understood tools and terminology relative to the appraisal process sufficient to perform collateral reviews. ' • Knowledgeable of scratch & dent, non-performing, and/or sub -prime loans. • Possessed ability to perform standard credit and income analysis. • Excellent time management skills prioritizing and follow-up with strong written and verbal skills.. • Ability to assess information and details then render an accuratarecommendation based on guidelines. • Demonstrated ability to work well with clients and the ability to thrive in a -fast pace or changing environment. • Demonstrated integrity, professional behavior and teamwork while being known for being punctual, dependable and adhered to company policies and procedures. UNDERWRITER SILICON VALLEY STAFFING (SVS) June 2001.to December 2002 • Worked under moderate supervision and applied knowledge of the business, its products, and processes. • Used established procedures and job experience to perform moderately complex work assignments and problem resolution when underwriting • Demonstrated a full understanding of all aspects of mortgage underwriting and adhered to established Service Level Objectives. • Performed underwriting on moderately complex loan files; thorough review and evaluation of credit applications to assess the loan package for approval and identify and fraudulent activity. • Provided feedbackto the Processors and Originators to improve quality of files. TEMPORARY & CONTRACT ASSIGNMENTS STAFF NEGOTIATOR The Law Office of Thomas Metevia; Jupiter, Florida LOSS MITIGATION SPECIALIST II Washington Mutual/Chase (Contract); Melbourne, Florida LOAN OFFICER/OUTSIDE SALES Eagle Nationwide Mortgage Bank; Vero Beach, Florida MORTAGE BANKER Foundation Financial Group; Tampa, Florida MORTAGE.BANKER intercontinental Capital Group; Tampa, Florida EDUCATION UNIVERSITY OF NORTH FLORIDA — Jacksonville, FL Bachelor of Arts, Business Administration HILLSBOROUGH COMMUNITY COLLEGE — Tampa, FL Associates of Arts, Business Administration COMPUTER SKILLS MSP Citrix Lender Live VLS LSP Desktop MRW Sharepoint DWS KID FRW March 2010 to November 2010 April 2009 to November 2009 October 2008 to January 2009 October 2007 to June 2008 September 2006 to September 2007 LISA Unifr WPII Corelogic A,gentDesktop Pega 1-VQUIt Kroll Vender Scope 557 Indian River County Boards & Commissions Submit Date: Oct 01, 2025 Profile Ardra: Rigby First Name Middle Last Name Initial ..: . rigbyardra@gmail.com Email Address - - 8465 59th Avenue Street Address Suite or Apt Vero Beach FIL 32967 city State Postal Code Home: (772) 501-4749 Business: Primary Phone Alternate Phone Employer Job Title Which Boards would you like to apply for? CDBG - Community Development Block Grant Citizen Advisory Task Force: Submitted How long have you been a resident of Indian River County? ... FL Are you a full-time or part-time resident? Select one. 17 Full Time Please list current employer or businesses. If retired, please list any business experience that may be applicable to the committee. Please list any licenses you presently hold: Please list any organization of which you are currently a member: West Wabasso Progressive Civic Club, Inc. Prime Equity Initiative, Inc. Please list any other committees or boards you currently sit on: Interests & Experiences Ardra Rigby Indian River County Boards & Commissions Submit Date: Oct 24, 2025 Profile Kathryn: Ra_decke First Name Middle Last Name Initial kathryn@casanoelectric.com Email Address 408 21st St SE Sheet Address Suite or Apt Vero Beach FL 32962 city State Postai Code Mobile: (772) 473-3326 Business: (772}:567-8134 Primary Phone Alternate Phone F. V. Casano Electrical Contractor, Inc. Vice President Employer Job Title Which Boards would you like to apply for? CBAA - Construction Board Of Adjustment and Appeals: Submitted How long have you been a resident of Indian River County? 32 Are you a full-time or part-time resident? Select one. W Full Time Please list current employer or businesses. if retired, please list any business experience that may be applicable to the committee. F. V. Casano Electrical Contractor, Inc. Please list any licenses you presently hold: EC13014013 Please list any organization of which you are currently a member: Please list any other committees or boards you currently sit on: Youth Guidance Mentoring Academy - Board of Directors Member Interests & Experiences 56.1 Kathryn Radecke Why are you interested in serving on a board or commission? Reapplying for this board. It has been an honor to serve on this board, especially as Chair this year. It is my goal to help the board become more efficient, thorough, and professional with its reviews of county investigations and public input. Kathryn Radecke_Resume.odf upload a Resume Demographics Race (Used for State Reporting) p Caucasian Do you have a government recognized disability? (Used for State reporting information) r Yes r• No s it 562 Kathryn Radecke CONTACT (772) 4 TW Vero Beach, FL EDUCATION BACHELOR OF BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION: MARKETING 2015 - Cum Laude 6 Stetson University De Land, FL UNIVERSITY ACH.I,EVEMENTS Resident Advisor (RA) - 3 yrs Marketing Achievement Award VICE PRESIDENT / STATE CERTIFIED ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR F.V. CASANO ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR, INC. I MARCH 2016 - CURRENT 3rd Generation to enter the family business, personally dedicated towards building the company to be a respectable & prospering place to work - to positively change the perspective on the trades & reestablish the value of hard work in future generations. • Oversee all business operations, employee benefits/incentive programs, professional communications, & customer relations. Designed & coded a new company website. • In -field training with our team on service calls and residential/commercial projects. • CTE Steering Committee Member for the Indian River County School District that succeeded in the board approving the Treasure Coast Career Technical Center that offers high school students vocational education while receiving dual enrollment credits and career certificates. • Guest Speaker in local schools and Boys & Girls Clubs to promote our industry and educate students on the opportunities & rewards within it. This has led to summer work programs & positions as a helper within our company. Team Leader for 3 years at the Future Builders of America Annual Summit. CHAIR - CONSTRUCTION BOARD OF ADJUSTMENTS & APPEALS INDIAN RIVER COUNTY COMMISSION ( JANUARY 2023 - CURRENT The primary responsibilities of the CBAA are as follows: • Revoke or suspend the registration of any person approved, registered, or licensed who shall be guilty of any one or more of the offenses listed in IRC Code 5400.07 and 400.08; • Hear appeals of decisions, administrative complaints, and interpretations of the building official relating to County ordinances, rules, and regulations; • Hear appeals of decisions and interpretations of the building and fire codes for the construction of buildings throughout the County and review proposed changes in the building code; MEMBER - BOARD OF DIRECTORS & PRE -APPRENTICESHIP COMMITTEE YOUTH GUIDANCE MENTORING ACADEMY I MAY 2022 - CURRENT . Provide guidance on carrying out Youth Guidance Mentoring Academy's mission by collaborating with the other board members, executive director, and staff. Responsible for designing the booklet for a $1.5M Capital Campaign, providing insight on the pre - apprenticeship programs, & contributing suggestions for new marketing and communications materials. COMMITTEE MEMBER VERO SHORES OWNERS ASSOCIATION I FEB 2021 - CURRENT Designed & coded a new association website to offer more historical information, community resources, and updates to homeowners. . Redesigned publications to homeowners which increased engagement & event participation. Senior Achievement Award . Responsible for welcoming new homeowners to the neighborhood. for Top Case Analysis Performance in Business & Marketing CO-FOUNDER / SECRETARY WOMEN ON THE BEACH (NONPROFIT) I JUNE 2015 - APRIL 2022 Campus -Wide Community Development of the Year A grass roots 501(c)(3) non-profit corporation that supports education, economic development, and Award conservation by: o Assisting with local economic development by supporting a viable new business venture each year. Deans List 2011 2015 o Supporting the development of deep entrepreneurial thinking our community's youth. o Promoting local businesses and organizations that set the example for our youth by having high CORE COMPETENCIES standards of social and environmental performance, accountability, and transparency. o Throwing one incredible fundraising event each year, A WoB Worthy Day of Adventure, that gets women outdoors, learning about, and enjoying this Paradise we call home. Analytical Thinking MARKETING INTERN Adaptability Leadership AAA NATIONAL HEADQUARTERS I OCTOBER 2013 - MAY 2015 Project Management • Responsible for ExactTarget and GoogleAnalytics reports - analyzed market data and consumer trends Interpersonal Communication to assist Executives, Managers, and Directors with specialized marketing projects. • Part of the initial planning and development of an internal Women's Leadership pro>�. • Offered a project management position upon university graduation. Indian River County Boards & Commissions Submit Date: Oct 06, 2025 Profile William B. Schuh, Jr. First Name Middle Last Name - - Initial brad@summitcm.net Email Address - - - 972 East Polo Grounds Drive street Address. suke or Apt Vero Beach FIL 32966 city state Poftl Code Home: (772) 569-6283 Mobile: (772) 473-9705 Primary Phone Alternate Phone Summit Construction Consultant Employer lob Tige I' Which Boards would you like to apply for? CBAA - Construction Board Of Adjustment and Appeals: Submitted . How long have you been a resident of Indian River County? 49 years Are you a full-time or part-time resident? Select one. W Full Time i Please list current employer or businesses. If retired, please list any business experience that may be applicable to the committee. Summit Construction- Ownerq. Please list any licenses you presently hold: CBC 1259095 Please list any organization of which you are currently a member: Please list any other committees or boards you currently sit on: Interests & Experiences .564 William B. Schuh, Jr. L Why are you interested in serving on a hoard or commission? To utilize my past construction experience to assist local officials in their review of local contractor issues WILLIAM-SCHUH-12-12-13 pdf Upload a Resume Demographics Race (Used for State Reporting) FT. . . Caucasian Do you have a government recognized disability? (Used for State reporting information) c Yes r No 565 William B. Schuh, Jr. WILLIAM B. SCHUH, R* President of Summit Construction of Vero Beach, L,C: EDUCATION 1983-1987 University of Florida Gainesville,L Bachelor of Building £onstnmtion LICENSING Certified .Building Contractor -- Stye .of Florida WORK EXPERIENCE 1999 — Present Summit Construction Vers Beach, FL President Project Manager -- Commercial Pro, jects- .: Estimating • Procurement of Subcontractors and Purchase Orders • Owner/Architect Coord'mat c►n . . • Change Orders, Scheduling, Quality Control • Job Cost Accounting, Pay Request; Schedule of Values 1992 -1999 Barth Construction, Inc. Vero =Beach, FL Project Manager -- Commercial Projects. • Estimating • Procurement of Subcontractors and Purchase Orders • Owner/Architect Coordination • Change Orders, Scheduling Quality Control + Job Cost Accounting, Pay Request,: Schedule of Values 1990 -1 992 Barth Construction, Inc. item Beach, FL Cost and Scheduling Engineer • Estimating, Scheduling, Change Order Controls • Project Scope Definition + Bid. Package Design and Value Engineering RESUME - WILLIAM B. SCHUH, JR. PAGE 2 . .566 ftperienc e Brad .Schuh is the founder of Summit Construction. Over the past thr+ years Cllr. Sdv. h has been involved in numerous commercial constructioa projects throughoi lndian River, S. Lucia, & Okeechobee Counties. His experience ranges from small room renovations to office buildings, new facilities complexes and industrial projects. All of Brad's projects have been completed on time and within budget; no litigation has ever been associated with any project that he has ever been involved with, ■ Savanna Ridge Elem. School Rodd Magna Addlilions tt C Shooting Range • Weatherbee Elem. School • GWWd M,.& Renovaiftns Alternative Education Center • ALA bill Haven Preschool • IRCC Cosmetology Facility' IRCC Hurricane Repairs 2004 • Wabasso Elem. Renovations • IRCC Misc./Continuing Contracts SRHS 5 f ! ROTC • Trinity Church Renovations • SLC Fairgrounds Buildings • IRCC Bookstore 814 F • Thompson°Elem. Renovations ■ Pocahantas Park • Pointe West Clubhouse • Vero Beach H.S. Renovations Rosewood Cafeteria IRCC 11"PtNumep, fealty • Jungle Trall Park , Rosewood MiMpurpose Room ' IRCC-Welks' Pavars, Clrarnage • Round Island Park • Vero Beach Erem. Renovations ` Vero Beach Air t4far>gars Leisure SquarwGym Building a IRCC Radio Station ' Vero Beach AlMortTerminai • Pelican Island Elem. Renovations • Gifford M.S. Gyrt►naslurn ' St. Anastasia Renovation • Sebastian Elem. Renovations • IRC t#ilitiesoperations Bldgs. ' SRMS Music Wing • IRE Multipurpose Room• IRCC Crime Lab S" (lab Ttrrnis Center • Freshman Learning Center •. IRCC Roofing Replacements in Aqt Products Building • � Services Complex Education Bachelor of Science in Building Construction, :Unhosly of Florida, 1987 LEEDs Green Budding Education 2008- License Certified[ Building. Cir :568 Indian River County Boards & Commissions Submit Date: Oct 20, 2025 Profile Jason W. Short First Nsme Middle tad Name Initial . . jshort@millsshortassociates.com Email Address - - - - - 4030 Oak Hollow Avenue Street Address Suite or Apt Vero Beach FL 32966 - city State Postal Code Mobile: (772) 473-2571 Primary Phone Alternate Phone Mills Short & Associates LLC Owner/Principal Employer Job Title Which Boards would you like to apply for? CBAA - Construction Board Of Adjustment and Appeals: Submitted How long have you been a resident of Indian River County? 19 i Are you a full-time or part-time resident? Select one: 67 Full Time Please list current employer or businesses. If retired, please list any business experience that may be applicable to the committee. Mills, Short & Associates LLC Please list any licenses you presently hold: I P.E., M.ASCE Please list any organization of which you are currently a member: Vero Beach Little League (Board) Please list any other committees or boards you currently sit on: No Interests & Experiences 56..9 Jason W. Short Why are you interested in serving on a board or commission? To enhance community development, awareness and compliance. Also, to share my knowledge, experience and expertise in the field. Resumes lason_Short.pdf Upload a Resume Demographics Race (Used for State Reporting) pr Caucasian Do you have a government recognized disability? (Used for State reporting information) r Yes r No 570 Jason W. Short Home Address: Phone: (772) 226-7282 4030 Oak Hollow Ave. Cell Phone: (772) 473-2571 Vero Beach, FL 32966 JShort@MillsShortAssociates.com Jason W. Short, P.E. M.ASCE About Professional Engineer (Multiple State Licensure) with advanced engineering skills and knowledge to design structures, enhance the manufacturability of products, make existing products and processes more profitable, along with developing new and emerging technologies. Education Bachelor of Science Mechanical Engineering, November 2003 Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology Terre Haute, IN Related Courses & • Advanced in AutoCAD, Mechanical Desktop, Microsoft Office Products, Chief Architect Qualifications • 3-D modeling software experience: Pro-E/1-DEAS/SolidWorks • Fluid and Thermal flow systems, Electrical Systems, Dynamics, Materials Testing, MATLAB • Machine Design, Propulsion Systems: Gas Turbines, Computer Applications, Measurements Lab, Biomaterials: Artificial Organs, Advanced Structures Materials • Experience with SAP R3 • Six Sigma Greenbelt Certified, FLASH Certified • Sales experience/expertise • Upper management/decision making • Registered Professional Engineer (2008) in Florida, Kentucky, Georgia, North Carolina, South Carolina, Virginia, Texas, Michigan, Tennessee Experience Mills, Short & Associates January 2014 — Present Vero Beach, FL Managing Partner/Principal Engineer • Design and consulting engineering (national & regional projects) • Specializing in construction management, structural design, civil engineering, and mechanical engineering • Non -threshold, Special Inspections on structures, connections, welds, and specialized construction elements • Project management from concept through implementation • High-end commercial and residential project structural design and inspection • Aluminum/steel/concrete/CMU/wood frame structure design from concept through implementation • Full structure design from conceptual through all aspects of permit approval (Architectural Design, Civil Engineering/Site Plan, Structural Engineering, Mechanical, Electrical, and Plumbing Engineering • Pool structure/equipment engineering • Special foundation & shoring design/engineering / Coastal Engineering structure design • Site specific shutter/hurricane protection applications • Product design/implementation/code compliance/certification • Site specific component/cladding calculations/MWFRS design • Grew client base and revenue from $180k in 2014 to +/-$4 million in 2024 JLS Engineering Consultants, LLC June 2009 — 2014 Vero Beach, FL Owner/Principal Engineer • Design and consulting engineering (national & regional projects) • Specializing in construction management, structural design, civil engineering, and mechanical engineering • Project management from concept through implementation • Aluminum/steel structure design from concept through implementation • Pool structure/equipment engineering • Foundation design/engineering • Site specific shutter/hurricane protection applications • Product design/implementation/code compliance/certification • Site specific component/cladding calculations • Tripled client database/workload/projects in 3 years 571 Central Window of Vero Beach, Inc. January 2006 — 2012 Vero Beach, FL Project Engineer/Sales Consultant/Management • Managing day to day activities of field workers/supervisors • Direct involvement with glass/window/door/hardware suppliers • Familiar with glass composition, fabrication, and implementation • Designing/implementing custom heavy glass showers/mirrors/custom storefront systems • Performing structural calculations on shower enclosures/fixed glass framing • Increasing productivity of existing shop floor • Efficiently analyzing/organizing production processes to enhance profitability/maximizing output along with minimizing input • Using Six Sigma principles to create a more productive and efficient workplace • Managing builder accounts on window/door projects from beginning to end • Working to expand companies portfolio of products and services to increase exposure/profit • Analysis of components for cladding/ensuring all products meet or exceed current building codes for specific applications • Familiarizing sales staff with updated local and state building codes and regulations • Highly involved with architects and engineers in the design and creation of new/existing homes • In-house Registered Florida Professional Engineer (Civil/Structural) Louis Poulsen Lighting, Inc. April 2005 — January 2006 Fort Lauderdale, FL Project Engineer • Customizing/designing lighting fixtures using AutoCAD/I-DEAS 3-D modeling software • Upgrading current products/product development • Project leader on updating the in -ground product line • Working with manufacturing to resolve customization/current issues • Leading projects from design concept through production • Working with international external/internal customers to facilitate product design needs • Troubleshooting field problems/supporting outside customer needs • Determining structural safety of light poles/fixtures • Designed parts for injection molding/casting • Worked with outside vendors to coordinate prototype parts for fixtures Whirlpool Corporation April 2004—April 2005 St. Joseph, MI Aerotek CE/IKEA Engineer • Interacting with international customer to support needs, as well as meet production deadlines • Working on developing new products for the IKEA brand which includes free standing ranges, cooktops, hoods, and built-in ovens • Performing safety audits on new design concept to qualify product for production • Designing wiring harness to suit new design concept for cooktop • Generating lists of hazards and tests to support safety documentation/code requirements • Interacting with test engineers to set up appropriate testing for performance and safety issues • Solving current problems with the product to make it a more robust design • Updating product literature to represent changes to product/qualify product for safety requirements • Coordinating distribution issues with logistics team which led to creation of new distribution strategy • Worked with all product lines including refrigeration, dishwashing, and cooking to implement new distribution requirements from IKEA • Saw product through all facets of design from concept to production • Highly involved with manufacturing, pre -pilot, pilot, pre -production builds • Coordinated project with all parties including marketing, production, compliance/testing, management • Lead team meetings weekly to update/resolve current issues throughout projects 572 AM General Corporation Summer 2003 Mishawaka, IN Manufacturing Engineering Intern • Updated facility/area drawings • Coordinated area moves to facilitate production • Led project to increase production as well as make workplace stations safer, more efficient • Supervised group of maintenance union workers on 2nd shift during plant shut down • Participated in making production line changes in largest engineering change to vehicle ever taken place within corporation Honeywell ALS Division Summer 2000,'01, '02 South Bend, IN Projects Engineering Intern 101, 102 • Developed layout for new front/security desk and security system • Leader of production enhancement machine move which dropped travel time of parts 90% • Led project on the filling-in of empty machine pits • Updated AutoCAD Drawings of entire facility • Led project on ventilation systems for part of facility • Designed pneumatic actuator lift to remove paint from existing aircraft wheels for repair and overhaul sites throughout the U.S. • Assisted in project for repair of existing fire water tank • Designed chemical treatment system for inner -loop of Carbon Vaporization Chamber which produced estimated cost avoidance of nearly $1 million dollars per year • Obtained Six Sigma Greenbelt Certification for chemical treatment system • Produced study on facility mobile equipment to find ways to reduce fleet, maintain existing fleet, as well as replace outdated members of mobile equipment Manufacturing Engineering Intern 100 • Created tool listings for Carbon Friction Machine Shop • Involved with high paced, manufacturing environment including heavy machinery • Took part in tooling cost and analysis study for new carbon cutting machine • Found relationships between machining feed speeds, types of cut, and materials that are cut • Created machining packets for the machinists to reduce time/enhance production by 75% Interests and • 4 -Year Varsity Football Letterman Activities • Member of Phi Gamma Delta Fraternity • Rock Band Member, Played at "Music for Miracles" which supported FDNY effort Awards received • All -State Football Jr. and Sr. Years, All -State Honorable Mention in Baseball Sr. Year • Received Academic All -State in Football Sr. year, Received Indiana Academic Honors Diploma • Received Nomination to the United States Military Academy from Congressman Fred Upton 573 Indian River County Boards & Commissions Profile Submit Date: Oct 01, 2025 Kenneth "chip" Landers First Name Middle Last Name Initial chip@chiplanders-com Email Address 1815 71st Ave Street Address Suite or Apt Vero Beach FL - 32966 City State Postal Code Mobile: (772) 473-7888 - Primary Phone Alternate Phone Berkshire Hathaway Florida Realty Broker -Associate Employer Job Title Which Boards would you like to apply for? P&ZC - Planning & Zoning Commission: Submitted How long have you been a resident of Indian River County? 50 years Are you a full-time or part-time resident? Select one. * - pr Full Time Please list current employer or businesses. If retired, please list any business experience that may be applicable to the committee. Berkshire Hathaway Florida Realty (formerly Norris and Compay) Please list any licenses you presently hold: Florida Real Estate Please fist any organization of which. you are currently a member: TCBA - Treasure Coast Builders Association RAIRC - Real Estate Association of Indian River County Please list any other committees or boards you currently sit on: IRC Planning and Zoning Commission Interests & Experiences 574 Kenneth "chip" Landers 575 Kenneth "chip" Landers 14-5. Indian River County Indian River County, Florida Administration Complex 1801 27th Street Vero Beach, Florida 32960 * * indianriver.gov MEMORANDUM File ID: 25-1071 Type: Attorneys Matters Meeting Date: 11/18/2025 TO: Board of County Commissioners THROUGH: John A. Titkanich, Jr., County Administrator THROUGH: Jennifer W. Shuler, County Attorney FROM: Susan J. Prado, Deputy County Attorney DATE: November 5, 2025 SUBJECT: Disposition of Calcutta Dock Property BACKGROUND The Country Club Pointe Unit 1 Re -Plat was approved by the IRC Board of County Commissioners on June 22, 1955. The County subsequently took possession and maintenance of the roads and the 35 -foot canal in that subdivision. The County later entered "Dock License Agreements" with residents of the Country Club Pointe Subdivision to construct docks and use portions of the 35 -foot portion of the canal denoted on the Country Club Pointe Unit 1 Re -plat. Originally, the annual payment on the Dock License Agreements was at a rate of $100 per year. That amount was amended some years later and some agreements have a higher rate. Residents of the Country Club Pointe Subdivision in Units 1 and 2 have through their counsel approached the County with a request to turn the 35 -foot canal area over to them to be managed by a dock association. The Country Club Pointe Dock Association, a not for profit organization, has been formed, and it continues to express a desire to take over ownership of the riparian land in order to continue to maintain the docks for use by residents in the subdivision. The docks are a recreational amenity that only serves residents of the Country Club Pointe Subdivision; therefore, they do not serve a public purpose. Conveyance of the docks and the 35 -foot canal area to a not for profit is allowed pursuant to Florida Statute §125.38. Based on this, our office recommends that the BOCC convey any and all interest that the County may have in the riparian land lying adjacent to Calcutta Drive in the Country Club Pointe Subdivision Unit 1 Re -Plat to The Country Club Pointe Dock Association. ANALYSIS N/A BUDGETARYIMPACT There should be no budget impact as the quit claim deed would be recorded by The Country Club Pointe Dock Association. Further, it may be possible to lower impacts on the budget by relieving the staff time currently used to oversee the docks located on this property and any maintenance on the canal that may be Indian River County, Florida Page 1 of 2 Printed on 11/13/2025 pow( L.egistar'RI needed in the future. PREVIOUS BOARD ACTIONS N/A POTENTIAL FUTURE BOARD ACTIONS N/A STRATEGIC PLAN ALIGNMENT N/A OTHER PLAN ALIGNMENT N/A STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends the Board declare the riparian land surplus, approve the attached resolution, and dispose of the property via quit claim deed to The Country Club Pointe Dock Association, and authorize the Chairman to execute all documents. Indian River County, Florida Page 2 of 2 Printed on 11/13/2025 powsopy Legistar"" Wto CD It aOD O Y O O Z O m W Y J O IL 0 i W 0 O 17Z H W J Q U N 3 i r Q 1 a r O w I IIS sl � Zw p 2 b£� I 5ii W 2 WuiI N QY I -I i � lbNtl] r = a anlaa vun��vo N CL LL J Z W a w w 0 ~ ~ -w ~ W I l7 J Z - N O 1 ,OL J U1. O O _ 3AWQ I031A A-109 - ra - r _ - _<N- N r W W 0 aO ,R - A_ n FF r a � w Z U 2? 7 W ? W O O axil r n m r W W O O n O ? .I V FW s 578 i � t� P! i J � I I �1� E �€rii c1� � ` ��8�! �, 7 >fc • i is � � �:q } e•.P - � { . i�. p • _ � i� ;� ( / ; � yyi4�Omi;;a � i� � ` f ��, -��s ,,. CuW [ . � F e �«I 81°�ii ♦ � � eian�°!!ai I��EEil. C �EiP�j�� tlF{� 1 i� i "bil- tgill W 0 O 17Z H W J Q U N 3 i r Q 1 a r O w I IIS sl � Zw p 2 b£� I 5ii W 2 WuiI N QY I -I i � lbNtl] r = a anlaa vun��vo N CL LL J Z W a w w 0 ~ ~ -w ~ W I l7 J Z - N O 1 ,OL J U1. O O _ 3AWQ I031A A-109 - ra - r _ - _<N- N r W W 0 aO ,R - A_ n FF r a � w Z U 2? 7 W ? W O O axil r n m r W W O O n O ? .I V FW s 578 579 cs m Y I, Zli 14 'tk il.'_ 3A A 10 tl 'y Vd A rMY-7d VM 0"O'y 17VSSVN ct tu 3A /H C, wu no vo _� j— 579 RESOLUTION NO. 2025 - A RESOLUTION OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, DECLARING A PORTION OF LAND LOCATED IN COUNTRY CLUB POINT SUBDIVISION UNIT 1 SURPLUS AND DEEDING ANY AND ALL INTEREST TO THE COUNTRY CLUB POINTE DOCK ASSOCIATION. WHEREAS, Indian River County (hereinafter "County") has maintained the road Calcutta Drive and the adjacent 35 -foot canal, located at Plat Book 4, Page 11; and WHEREAS, The Country Club Pointe Dock Association has formed a Not for Profit to provide neighborhood management of the docks and has approached the County requesting the riparian land (the 35 -foot canal) be deeded to them; and WHEREAS, the retention of said riparian land, or portion thereof, as described in the Country Club Point Subdivision Unit 1 Re -Plat, serves no public purpose; and WHEREAS, the County may dispose of this property pursuant to Florida Statute § 125.38 and convey it to a not for profit when determined by the Board of County Commissioners to promote community interests and welfare and be in the best interest of the County, WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners is declaring the property surplus for these reasons; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida that: INDIAN RIVER COUNTY DOES HEREBY: 1. Declare the land to be surplus; 2. Determines that disposition of the property to a not for profit neighborhood Dock Owners Association promotes community interests and welfare and is in the best interest of the County; and 3. Declare and abandon all right, title, and interest that it may have in the interest dedicated to it via the Country Club Pointe Unit 1 Re -plat, located at Plat Book 4, Page 11 via quit claim deed to The Country Club Pointe Dock Association. THIS RESOLUTION was moved for adoption by Commissioner , seconded by Commissioner , and adopted on the day of , 2025, by the following vote: RESOLUTION NO. 2025 - 580 Chairman Joseph E. Flescher Vice -Chairman Deryl Loar Commissioner Susan Adams Commissioner Joe Earman Commissioner Laura Moss The Chairman declared the resolution duly passed and adopted this day of , 2025 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA Joseph E. Flescher, Chairman ATTEST: Ryan L. Butler, Clerk of Court and Comptroller M. APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: Susan J. Prado, Deputy County Attorney Deputy Clerk K 581 ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION OF THE COUNTRY CLUB POINTE DOCK ASSOCIATION, INC. The undersigned hereby forms a corporation not for profit under Chapter 617 of the Florida Statutes (the "Corporation") and, for these purposes, does hereby adopt the following Articles of Incorporation. ARTICLE I - NAME The name of the Corporation shall be THE COUNTRY CLUB POINTE DOCK ASSOCIATION, INC. ARTICLE II - PURPOSES The purposes for which the Corporation is organized are to: 1. Manage and regulate each of the designated and/or constructed boat docks located on or about that property depicted in Exhibit "A", which is attached hereto and made a part hereof. The boat docks are identified by number on Exhibit "A" and are individually referred to herein as "a Dock" and collectively as "the Docks." The Docks and adjacent area east of the Calcutta Drive right of way and south of south of Golf View Drive are referred to herein collectively as "the Dock Area." 2. Manage the restriction of the possession and use of each Dock in the manner set forth herein and to provide rules and regulations concerning the same as well as the general use of the Dock Area. 3. Provide for a manner of management of the Docks and related facilities through THE COUNTRY CLUB POINTE DOCK ASSOCIATION, INC., a Florida not-for-profit corporation (hereinafter referred to as the "Association"). 4. The Corporation shall not engage, nor shall any of its funds, property, or income be used, in carrying on propaganda or otherwise attempting to influence legislation, nor shall the Corporation participate in or intervene in (including the publishing or distributing of statements) any political campaign on behalf of any candidate for public office, nor shall the Corporation engage in subversive activities except as required to further the purposes of the Corporation. 5. In general, to do any and all acts and things, and to exercise any and all powers which now or hereafter are lawful for the Corporation to do or exercise under Florida law and the Code. 6. The Corporation makes no representation or warranty as to any ownership right in any aspect of the Dock or the Dock Area. ARTICLE III — POWERS In addition to the powers and duties delineated in Chapter 617 of the Florida Statutes and the articles and bylaws adopted thereunder, the Corporation: 582 1. Develop rules and regulations for the use of the Dock Area and all improvements therein as well as procedures and mechanisms for the enforcement of same. 2. Manage and maintain the Dock Area, 3. Regulate the exclusive use and possession of each of the Docks. 4. May make and enter into contracts and assume such other functions as are necessary to carry out the purposes of the Corporation; 5. May perform all acts and things necessary or convenient to carry out the powers expressly granted in this section, and to achieve the purposes of this Corporation; 6. May make expenditures from funds raised and/or received, including any necessary administrative expenditures consistent with its powers and open and maintain bank accounts of the Corporation; 7. May indemnify, and purchase and maintain insurance on behalf of, directors, officers and employees of the Corporation against any personal liability or accountability; 8. Shall disburse funds pursuant consistent with the purposes of the Corporation and Florida law; 9. May sue and be sued and appear and defend in all actions and proceedings in its corporate name to the same extent as a natural person; 10. May adopt, use, and alter a common corporate seal. However, such seal need not always contain the words "corporation not for profit"; and 11. May adopt, amend, and repeal the articles of incorporation and bylaws in a way that is not inconsistent with the powers granted to it for the administration of the affairs of the Corporation and the exercise of its corporate powers. ARTICLE IV - MEMBERS Each real property owner of any residence located on Golfview Drive, Par Drive (lots 9 through 16) or Calcutta Drive in the County Club Pointe subdivision, Vero Beach, Indian River County, Florida, that is entitled to one of the Docks as shown on the membership register attached hereto as Exhibit "B" shall be a Designated Member. Without regard to the number of owners of any lot or residence, only one membership share shall be designated for each residence and a residence constructed on more than one lot shall be considered one residence and shall be entitled to one membership share except as provided herein. Only the primary residence on a lot shall be entitled to a membership share and ancillary and auxiliary structures shall not be counted as a residence for the purpose of this section. Membership in the Corporation is not an indicia of ownership and the Corporation is not owned by the members. Tenants and non -owner occupants of a residence shall not be members. 583 Any party not desiring to be a member of the Corporation may notify the Corporation that they no longer desire to be a member of the Corporation but may, in the future, elect to become a member of the Corporation by notifying the Corporation of such election. ARTICLE V — OPERATION OF THE CORPORATION 1. EXCLUSIVE USE: The possession of the Docks as of the date of the formation of the Corporation is controlled and managed by Indian River County, Florida. The Corporation is being established for the purpose of regulating the use and possession of the Docks as a successor in role to Indian River County, Florida. The twenty (20) Docks numbered for identification as one (1) through twenty (20) on the attached Exhibit "A", are reserved as an exclusive and transferrable right of use for a specific numbered Dock and are transferrable from the registered user/assignee to another person, who is a member of the Corporation or is entitled to be a member of the Corporation, subject to the terms of these covenants, conditions, reservations, and restrictions. The Corporation shall assign each Dock to its current, designated user as per the last registry of users by Indian River County, Florida as it exists on the date of the formation of the Corporation (as shown on Exhibit "B"). A Member receiving such a designation shall herein be referred to as a "Designated Member." Nothing herein shall prevent a Designated Member from being assigned more than one of the Docks if that Designated Member is shown on Exhibit "B" as being assigned more than one dock. The Corporation shall maintain said registry of the parties entitled to the use and possession of each of the Docks. The Corporation shall issue a written designation ("Designation Certificate") of use for each Dock therein designating the member entitled to the exclusive use of the Dock, the identifying number of the Dock and the real property owned by the Member entitling them to be a member of the Corporation. The form of the Designation Certificate shall be as established by the Corporation and may be recorded in the Public Records of Indian River County, Florida. A party must be a Member of the Corporation in order to be entitled to the possession and use of a Dock. Membership is only available to owners of properties on Golfview Drive, Par Drive (lots 9 through 16) or Calcutta Drive in the County Club Pointe subdivision, Vero Beach, Indian River County, Florida. 2. Any assignment, pledge, encumbrance, divestiture, conveyance, lease or any other operation wherein the designated use of any Dock(s) is assigned without the prior, written consent of the Corporation shall be void excepting that if a Member is the Designated Member of one or more of the Docks and (i) the Designated Member sells their entire interest in their real property shown in their Designation Certificate for their dock(s); (ii) the Designated Member conveys the real property shown in their Designation Certificate for their dock(s) to a trust or entity wherein the designated Member is the beneficial owner of the trust or entity; or (iii) the property identified in the Designation Certificate is transferred by operation of law (e.g. inheritance, etc.); the new owner shall be entitled to assume the rights of the prior Member and the Corporation shall provide an amended Designation Certificate. For purposes of clarification, the intent of Corporation is that any successor to a Designated Member shall share in the same benefits and responsibilities as the Designated Member and shall effectively replace the existing Designated Member whose interest in the Corporation shall pass to the new real property owner. Any improper 584 assignment, pledge, encumbrance, divestiture, conveyance, lease or any other operation wherein the designated use of any Dock without the prior, written consent of the Corporation, unless corrected within ten (10) days of the date of notice by the Corporation, shall entitle the Corporation to redesignate the Dock's use to a different Member pursuant to the process established in paragraph 3 of this Article. 3. In the event that a Designated Member desires to convey their interest in any dock other than as provided in 2 above, the Designated Member shall notify the Corporation, in writing at the last address of the Corporation, and the Corporation shall notify each owner of a property otherwise qualified to be a potential Member of the Corporation (e.g. (i) not currently a Designated Member and (ii) is an owner of a property located on Golfview Drive, Par Drive (lots 9 through 16) or Calcutta Drive in the County Club Pointe subdivision, Vero Beach, Indian River County, Florida) of the availability of the dock for acquisition and provide for a means and manner by which the dock is to be assigned to a new member. The process shall involve a blind or silent auction whereby all prospective bidders shall submit written bids to the Corporation. Each bid must state the total price offered and must be accompanied by proof of funds satisfactory to the Corporation. All bids shall be submitted in sealed form or through an approved confidential electronic submission process designated by the Corporation. The contents of any bid shall remain confidential and shall not be disclosed to other bidders. The Corporation shall have no obligation to provide information regarding the number or bid amount of bids received. The Corporation shall promulgate and include further procedures and processes for the auction and the timeframe for the participation and completion of the auction and ultimate payment and assignment. The Corporation may require refundable deposits in order to qualify for bidding and all payments, including the deposit, may, at the discretion of the Corporation, be paid directly to the existing Designated User of the Dock. The successful bidder shall become a Member of the Corporation and the new Designated User of the Dock. The prior Designated User shall no longer be a member of the Corporation unless they are a Designated Member for a different dock. 4. The Docks and the Dock Area will be operated and controlled ultimately by the Corporation including, but not limited to, the ability to assign the specifically numbered Docks as provided herein. 5. The Corporation shall be entitled to maintain the Dock Area, including the canal and surrounding vegetation for the area denoted on the Plat of County Club Pointe Unit 1, as well as to procure insurance for the Dock Area and to protect the members of the Board of Directors. 6. The Docks and Dock Area shall be operated under such rules and regulations as may be from time to time promulgated by the Corporation, and the use and ownership of same shall be subject to those rules and regulations. The Corporation may promulgate separate rules and regulations covering the individual Docks to which the exclusive right of use has been transferred and separate rules and regulations covering the remaining portion of the Dock Area. Rules and regulations may also be promulgated for any areas commonly used for the enjoyment of the persons utilizing the use of the Dock Area. 7. General Use Rules: a) Only pleasure boats in good condition and under their own power (mechanical, paddle or sail, etc.) shall be permitted to be berthed at the Docks. b) Leasing of Docks is prohibited without the prior consent of the Corporation. c) Commercial use of the Docks and Dock Area is prohibited. 585 d) There shall be no repair or refitting of boats at the Docks and Dock Area excepting minor repairs and/or routine maintenance. e) Living aboard a vessel is prohibited. f) Boat supplies and materials may only be stored in dock boxes where such boxes are permitted by the rules and regulations of the Corporation. g) No refuse shall be thrown overboard; and no oil, spirits, inflammable material, or excessive bilge shall be discharged into the canal adjacent to the Dock Area or in the Dock Area. h) Only minimal wake shall be permitted in the vicinity of the Docks and Dock Area. i) All use shall be subject to all applicable, governing laws, ordinances and regulations of Indian River County, Florida and the State of Florida. j) All Docks shall be maintained in good repair subject to only typical wear and tear. A Designated Member of a Dock shall be in default, subject to any cure provisions promulgated by the Corporation, if said Member has not strictly and completely complied with and abided by all of the terms, conditions, and provisions of the rules and regulations of the Corporation, including those provided herein. Upon a default, the Corporation shall have all of the rights, privileges, and remedies, all of which are cumulative, at law or in equity generally and as are set forth herein and in any related instruments. In addition, each defaulting Member shall pay to the Corporation all of the Corporation's costs, expenses, losses, or damages that may be sustained by the Corporation because of said Member's default, including but not limited to transfer and storage charges for Member's personal property removed from the boat dock slip, including any boat moored in violation of the terms hereof, brokers' commissions, and attorneys' fees for enforcing or construing the rules of the Corporation, whether for litigation, including appellate proceedings, or otherwise. In addition, the Corporation may, at its option, utilize any remedies available at law or in equity, including injunctive relief, to enjoin, enforce, terminate, or revoke any assignment of the exclusive right of use should the Member be in default. In such event, the Member shall pay all reasonable costs, expenses, and attorneys' fees incurred in that regard. Each Designated Member shall pay to the Corporation their prorated share of the estimated annual expenses of the Corporation. At least thirty days prior to the commencement of the Corporation's fiscal year (currently January 1 through December 31), the Corporation shall establish an annual budget for those costs and expenses it estimates it will incur in the following fiscal year. Assessments shall be due no later than the start of the fiscal year and the Corporation shall be permitted to declare further amounts due during the fiscal year in the event of a cash flow shortage (e.g. as a result of increased or unanticipated costs, failure to receive assessment payments from all Members, etc.). ARTICLE VI - TERM OF EXISTENCE The Corporation shall have a perpetual term unless and until dissolved pursuant to Florida Law. ARTICLE VII — BOARD OF DIRECTORS/OFFICERS 1. The Corporation shall be governed by a Board of Directors that shall consist of at least three (3) but no more than nine (9) members. 586 2. Each member of the Board of Directors shall serve for a term of four (4) years. 3. Vacancies on the Board of Directors shall be filled by appointment by the remaining members of the Board of Directors. The Board of Directors shall annually elect one of its appointive members as chairperson and one as vice chairperson. The members may, by a vote of the majority of the Board members, remove a member from the position of chairperson or vice chairperson prior to the expiration of his or her term as chairperson or vice chairperson. His or her successor shall be elected to serve for the balance of the removed chairperson's or vice chairperson's term. 5. The chairperson of the Board of Directors shall keep a record of the proceedings of the Board of Directors and is the custodian of all books, documents, and papers filed with the Board of Directors, the minutes of the Board of Directors, and the official seal of the Corporation. 6. The Board of Directors shall meet upon the call of the chairperson, at the request of the vice chairperson, or at the request of a majority of the Board of Directors. ARTICLE VIII - FIRST BOARD OF DIRECTORS The number of persons constituting the first Board of Directors shall be three (3) and the names of the persons who are to serve as the initial directors and their respective terms are as follows: Name Initial officer position Term Joel Rossmell President Four years Lillian "Lilly" Ellis Vice President Four years John Wright Secretary Four years John Wright Treasurer Four years ARTICLE IX - BY-LAWS The Bylaws of the Corporation shall be initially approved by a majority vote of the Board of Directors, and thereafter may be altered or rescinded by a majority vote of the directors at a duly called meeting of the Board of Directors in accordance with these Articles of Incorporation. ARTICLE X - AMENDMENTS TO THE ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION These Articles of Incorporation may be amended in the manner provided by law. 587 ARTICLE XI — DISSOLUTION Upon the dissolution of this organization, any remaining assets shall be distributed as provided under Florida law. Articles: ARTICLE XII - INITIAL REGISTERED OFFICE AND AGENT The name of the initial registered agent of the Corporation shall be: Barry G. Segal, P.A. The street address of the initial registered office of the Corporation shall be: 3096 Cardinal Drive, Suite 2C, Vero Beach, FL 32963 ARTICLE XIII - CORPORATION'S PRINCIPAL OFFICE The principal office of the Corporation shall be: Joel D. Rossmell 3004 Golfview Drive Vero Beach. FL 32960 ARTICLE XIV- INCORPORATOR The following is the name and street address of the incorporator signing these Barry G. Segal 3096 Cardinal Drive, Suite 2C Vero Beach, FL 32963 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have set my hand and seal this 51h day of November, 2025. Barry G. Segal 588 CERTIFICATE OF ACCEPTANCE AS REGISTERED AGENT Having been named as the Registered Agent in the Articles of Incorporation of THE COUNTRY CLUB POINTE DOCK ASSOCIATION, INC., I hereby accept and agree to act in this capacity. Dated: November 5th, 2025. Barry G. Segal 589 Exhibit "A" Dock Register 590 13 Exhibit "B" Membership Register 592 Dock No. Licensee Address Name 1 3003 Calcutta Dr. John and Carolyn Wright 2 3010 Par Dr. John and Kristin Pfleger 3 3002 Golf View Dr. Thomas L. Pease, Kevin Ellis and Lillian P. Ellis 4 3039 Golf View Dr. Clearance Yates 5 3004 Golf View Dr. Joel and Jennifer Rossmell 6 3003 Calcutta Dr. John and Carolyn Wright 7 3060 Par Dr. Patrick and Natalie Savadge 8 3010 Golf View Dr. Charles J. Replogle 9 3007 Calcutta Dr. William Wood 10 3043 Golf View Dr. Michael and Shannon Hauser 11 3009 Calcutta Dr. Bradford and Amanda Pfenning 12 3012 Golf View Dr. Jeffrey and Kere Minton 13 3023 Golf View Dr. Jeffrey and Jennifer Palleschi 14 3011 Calcutta Dr. Jeffrey and Patricia Cusson 15 3017 Golf View Dr. John and Rachel Clark 16 3013 Calcutta Dr. David Risinger 17 3030 Par Dr. John Jackson 18 3040 Par Dr. Carla Gridley (FKA Jackson) 19 3025 Golf View Dr. Kathryn L. Williams (Trustee) 20 3027 Golf View Dr. Matthew Barth 593 This document was prepared by: Indian River County Attorney's Office 1801 27th Street Vero Beach, FL 32960 (772)226-1425 QUIT -CLAIM DEED THIS QUIT -CLAIM DEED, executed this day of November, 2025, by INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, whose mailing address is 1801 2711 Street, Vero Beach, FL 32960 ("Grantor") to THE COUNTRY CLUB POINTE DOCK ASSOCIATION., a Florida not for profit corporation, whose mailing address is 3004 Golfview Drive, Vero Beach, FL 32960 ("Grantee"). WITNESSETH: That Grantor, for and in consideration of the sum of One Dollar ($1.00), in hand paid by Grantee, the receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, and other good and valuable consideration, does hereby quit -claim unto Grantee, its successors and assigns forever, all the right, title, interest, claim and demand which Grantor has in and to the following described lot, piece or parcel of land, situate, lying and being in the County of Indian River, State of Florida, to -wit: Being a parcel of partially submerged lands laying in the Re -Plat of Country Club Pointe Unit 1, Recorded at Plat Book 4, Page 11. Said parcel being more particularly identified and labeled "Canal' as shown on said plat. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Grantor has caused these presents to be executed in its name by its Board of County Commissioners acting by the Chair of said board and sealed these presents the day and year first above written. INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA ATTEST: Ryan L. Butler, Clerk of Court and Comptroller By: By: Deputy Clerk Joseph E. Flescher, Chairman Board of County Commissioners Approved as to Form and Legal Sufficiency: BCC Approval Date: Susan J. Prado, Esq. Deputy County Attorney 594 LocaliQ Florida PO Box 631244 Cincinnati, OH 45263-1244 GANNETT AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION NOTICE REGARDING CALCUTTA DOCKS (COUNTRY Christina Moore, ACP CLUB POINTE) Indian River County Attorneys Office NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the 1801 27th ST County Attorneys Office will be Vero Beach FL 32960-3388 considering the disposition of a portion of property located in Country Club Pointe Docks. STATE OF WISCONSIN, COUNTY OF BROWN This item will by the Indian River County Board of County Commis - Before the undersigned authority personally appeared, who sioners on Tuesday, November 18, 2025, at 9:05 a.m., or as soon on oath says that he or she is the Legal Advertising thereafter as the matter may be Representative of the Indian River Press Journal/St Lucie heard, in the County Commission News Tribune/Stuart News, newspapers published in Indian Chambers located on the first floor River/St Lucie/Martin Counties, Florida; that the attached of Building A of the County Admin - copy of advertisement, being a Legal Ad in the matter of istrative Complex, 1801 27th Street, Vero Beach, Florida 32960, Govt Public Notices, was published on the publicly at which time interested parties accessible websites of Indian River/St Lucie/Martin may be heard. Counties, Florida, or in a newspaper by print in the issues Inquiries regarding this matter of, on: should be directed to the County Attorney's Office located on the second floor of Building A the SCN StLucie-IndianRv-Stuart 10/29/2025 County Administrative Complex, SCN tcpalm.com 10/29/2025 1801 27th Street, Vero Beach, Florida 32960. Affiant further says that the website or newspaper complies Anyone who needs a special accom- with all legal requirements for publication in chapter 50, modation for this meeting must contact the County's Americans Florida Statutes. With Disabilities Act (ADA) Coordi- Subscribed and sworn to before me, by the legal clerk, who nator at 772-226-1223 at least 48 is personally known to me, on 10/29/2025 hours in advance of the meeting. INDIAN RIVER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY i COMMISSIONERS Legal Clerk .- JOSEPH E. FLESCHER, CHAIRMAN Pub: October 29, 2025 TCN11785141 Notary, State of WI, County of Brown My commission expires Publication Cost: $78.44 Tax Amount: $0.00 Payment Cost: $78.44 Order No: 11785141 # of Copies: Customer No: 1125303 1 PO #: THIS IS NOT AN INVOICE! Plcase do not use this j'a'm for paymenl remittance. KAITLYN FELTY Notary Public State of Wisconsin Page 1 of 1 595 Susan J. Prado From: Jennifer Shuler Sent: Friday, November 14, 2025 1:39 PM To: Susan J. Prado Subject: FW: Website Contact Form Submission - Calcutta Drive Docks / Debbie and Joe Biedenharn Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Flagged -----Original Message ----- From: Yaima Cardenas <ycardenas@indianrive r.gov> Sent: Friday, November 14, 2025 12:20 PM To: Jennifer Shuler <jshuler@indianriver.gov> Subject: Website Contact Form Submission - Calcutta Drive Docks / Debbie and Joe Biedenharn FYI Yaima Cardenas Commissioner Assistant for Vice Chairman Deryl Loar, District 4 Board of County Commissioners Indian River County 180127th Street, Bldg. A Vero Beach, FL 32960 Office: (772)226-1440 PLEASE NOTE: Florida has a very broad public records law. Most written communications to or from County officials regarding county business are considered to be public records and will be made available to the public and the media upon request. Your email messages may, therefore, be subject to public disclosure. • Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail. Think Green! -----Original Message ----- From: Website Form Submission <noreply@revize.com> Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2025 4:43 PM To: Deryl Loar <dloar@indianriver.gov> Cc: Scott Johnson <sjohnson@indianriver.gov> Subject: Website Contact Form Submission CAUTION: This message is from an external source. Please use caution when opening attachments or clicking links. first—name = Debbie and Joe last—name = Biedenharn email = debbiedenharn@gmail.com phone =7726336001 text -1696620181382 = 3002 NASSAU DR issue = Dear Commissioner Loar, 1 We are writing as homeowners in Country Club Pointe regarding the current proposal to re -allocate docks that are held under established riparian rights. Although this issue does not directly affect our own property, we feel strongly that the longstanding rights of our neighbors should be preserved. Many homeowners whose properties include these dock rights purchased their homes at higher values specifically because the docks were deeded as part of the property. In contrast, properties purchased without dock rights were priced accordingly, reflecting the absence of this benefit. Several of the affected homeowners have lived in the neighborhood for decades and have consistently taken responsibility for maintaining, repairing, and caring for these docks at their own expense. These docks have not only been part of the original property valuation but also part of the long-standing expectations and stability of our community. For these reasons, we believe it would be unfair and disruptive to change the designation, access, or allocation of these docks. Altering riparian rights at this stage would disregard the investments made by homeowners and undermine property values for those who purchased homes with these rights in place. We respectfully request that the Board maintain the current designation and uphold the existing riparian rights associated with these docks. Thank you for your time, attention, and service to our community. Sincerely, Debbie and Joe Biedenharn preferred—contact = email whichemailaddress = dloar@indianriver.gov 515, 2, Susan J. Prado From: Jennifer Shuler Sent: Friday, November 14, 2025 12:39 PM To: Susan J. Prado Subject: FW: Website Contact Form Submission - Calcutta Drive Docks / Clarence Yates Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Flagged -----Original Message ----- From: Yaima Cardenas <ycardenas@indianriver.gov> Sent: Friday, November 14, 2025 12:22 PM To: Jennifer Shuler <jshuler@indianriver.gov> Subject: Website Contact Form Submission - Calcutta Drive Docks / Clarence Yates FYI Yaima Cardenas Commissioner Assistant for Vice Chairman Deryl Loar, District 4 Board of County Commissioners Indian River County 180127th Street, Bldg. A Vero Beach, FL 32960 Office: (772)226-1440 PLEASE NOTE: Florida has a very broad public records law. Most written communications to or from County officials regarding county business are considered to be public records and will be made available to the public and the media upon request. Your email messages may, therefore, be subject to public disclosure. • Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail. Think Green! -----Original Message ----- From: Website Form Submission <noreply@revize.com> Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2025 12:32 PM To: Deryl Loar <dloar@indianriver.gov> Cc: Scott Johnson <sjohnson@indianriver.gov> Subject: Website Contact Form Submission CAUTION: This message is from an external source. Please use caution when opening attachments or clicking links. first—name = Clarence last—name = Yates email = cyates22@hotmail.com phone =7724802845 1 5�5�� text -1696620181382 = 3039 Golfview Drive issue = Country club pointe dock association I grew up in Vero Beach I have been a physician at Vero Radiology for 20 years. I have given time and money to local sports and associations for 20 years Ryan Bass has done nothing of the sort Now he is complaining and has been covertly efforting for years trying to take my dock. I paid for this as part of my real estate contract. It has a value. No regards for neighbors or community. Disgraceful Deryl, please do not let this happen I can not attend the meeting. I will be working reading examinations from our local ER Thank you for your attention to this matter Can we please end this frivolous nonsense preferred contact = email whichemailaddress = dloar@indianriver.gov 5�5 -� Susan J. Prado From: Jennifer Shuler Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2025 8:39 AM To: Susan J. Prado Subject: FW: Calcutta Docks - Today's Meeting Importance: High From: Deryl Loar <dloar@indianriver.gov> Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2025 8:32 AM To: Jennifer Shuler <jshuler@indianriver.gov> Subject: FW: Calcutta Docks - Today's Meeting Importance: High FYI aima Cardenas V Commissioner Assistant for Vice Chairman Deryl Loar, District 4 Board of County Commissioners Indian River County t 180127th Street, Bldg. A ero Beach, FL 32960 ffice: (772)226-1440 PLEASE NOTE: Florida has a very broad public records law. Most written communications to or from County officials regarding county business are considered to be public records and will be made available to the public and the media upon request. Your email messages may, therefore, be subject to public disclosure. @APlease consider the environment before printing this e-mail. Think Greenl From: Jennifer Davison Rossmell <idavison@veroortho.com> Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2025 8:23 AM To: Susan Adams <sadams@indianriver.gov>; Joseph E. Flescher <jflescher@indianriver.eov>; Deryl Loar <dloar@indianriver.eov>; Laura Moss <Imoss@indianriver.eov>; Joe Earman <jearman@indianriver.l=_ov> Cc: Susan J. Prado <sprado@indianriver.eov> Subject: Calcutta Docks - Today's Meeting Importance: High Is'm' essage is from71IWirha slourcO. Please us w eri ope` achmen s b is R Indian River County Commissioners, My name is Jennifer Davison Rossmell, and my husband Joel Rossmell, and I, reside on Golfview Drive within the Country Club Pointe subdivision. Although my husband will be there today at the meeting, I am unable to 585-5 attend and am writing as a concerned and directly affected resident to express my strong support for the proposed conveyance of the canal -side dock area to the Calcutta Dock Owners Association (DOA). Although I recognize that this has been a long and sometimes daunting process, I want to express sincere gratitude for the Commissioners' time, thoughtful consideration, and consistent communication with all parties involved, including the dock holders, legal counsel, and other residents. The transparency and willingness to engage with the community throughout this discussion has not gone unnoticed. In light of the County's findings regarding ownership and the documented history of maintenance and stewardship by the dock holders, I believe the proposed conveyance to the Dock Owners Association (DOA) represents the fairest and most equitable outcome. While I understand that one resident has raised objections, I respectfully note that this individual purchased a home with no dock license or assignment and has no financial or contractual investment in the docks. In contrast, 19 homeowners acquired their properties with dock assignments already in place, paid an increased value amount, and maintained the docks with the expectation of continued use. These dock holders have worked together, in good faith, to preserve, insure, and maintain the structures entirely at their own expense for many years. In doing so, they have effectively protected and enhanced a piece of land the County has now acknowledged it likely never owned. As part of the transition, the Dock Owners Association is committed to implementing annual safety inspections and maintaining compliance with all applicable regulations. The Association will develop and enforce dock maintenance standards to ensure the safety of all users and uphold the aesthetic and structural integrity of the dock facilities. Additionally, we are establishing clear violation procedures, including penalties and potential revocation of dock privileges, to ensure accountability among members and long-term preservation of the waterfront. Our goal is to maintain a safe, well -regulated, and neighborly environment that reflects the shared values of the Calcutta, Par and Golfview Drive dock holders. Finally, I believe the proposed transfer to the DOA is not only appropriate, but also a model of community -led stewardship. It ensures continuity, respects prior investment, and avoids unnecessary disruption for those who have consistently honored their obligations. I sincerely hope that the Commission will support this resolution on July 18. Sincerely, Jennifer Davison Rossmell 3004 Golfview Drive — Dock 5 Jennifer Davison Rossmell BHA, FACMPE Chief Executive Officer Vero Orthopaedics 772-257-3600 irossmell(d)vemortho.com vERO ORTHOPAEDICS THE STRENGTH OF EXPERIENCE A PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL: This document and the information contained herein are confidential and protected from disclosure pursuant to Federal law. This message is intended only for the use of the Addressee(s) and may contain information that is PRIVILEGED and CONFIDENTIAL. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that the use, dissemination, or copying of this information is strictly prohibited. If you received this communication in error, please erase all copies of the message and its attachments and notify the sender immediately. 5�s 1 Block&scarpa Afforneys at Law November 12, 2025 Sent Via Email Indian River County Board of County Commissioners 1801 271h Street Vero Beach, Florida 32960 Re: Public Comments - Articles of Incorporation of the Country Club Pointe Dock Owners' Association Dear County Commissioners, I am writing to you to submit comments and objections to the draft "Articles of Incorporation of the Country Club Pointe Dock Owners' Association," on behalf of Ryan Bass, a Country Club Pointe property owner who is directly affected by these proposed Articles and potential County relinquishment of its assumed ownership over riparian land associated with Calcutta Drive. Specifically, I wish to raise the following points: I. Can the conveyance of the riparian rights and docks comply with Chapter 125, Florida Statutes? At the June 3, 2025, BOCC meeting, Assistant County Attorney Susan Prado addressed this Board with the five possible options for relinquishing control over the riparian land and their association docks. Ms. Prado suggested the County could do the following: 1) Rent dock slips at fair market value to generate revenue; 2) Abandon the Right - of -Way to a Homeowners' Association (HOA) through public notice and hearings; 3) Abandoning the Right -of -Way to adjacent property owners, requiring similar public processes; 4) Selling the land at fair market value, with responsibilities FORT LAUDERDALE 401 E. Las Olas Blvd., 14'h Floor Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 (954)266-8527 ORLANDO 605 E. Robinson Street, Suite 130 Orlando, FL 32801 (407) 440-2100 ♦ Headquarters VERO BEACH 601 2151 Street, Suite 401 Vero Beach, FL 32960 (772)794-1918 (772)567 -4477 -Fax STUART 819 SW Federal Highway Suite 200 Stuart, FL 34994 (772) 258-4306 WEST PALM BEACH 500 S. Australian Avenue Suite 600 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 (561)861-4921 I shifting to new owners; and 5) Keeping existing licenses, despite potential constitutional issues related to public benefit`. Section 125.35(1)(a), Florida Statutes, provides that, The board of county commissioners is expressly authorized to sell and convey any real or personal property, and to lease real property, belonging to the county, whenever the board determines that it is to the best interest of the county to do so, to the highest and best bidder for the particular use the board deems to be the highest and best, for such length of term and such conditions as the governing body may in its discretion determine. It appears the County is ready to move forward with Option Two by relinquishing the Calcutta Drive docks to a proposed dock owners' association, which has been drafted by Attorney Barry Segal on behalf of the nineteen current dock license holders. This option, if approved without the conditions recommended below, would be inconsistent with the requirements of Section 125.35, F.S., for lack of sufficient public participation and an open bidding process. While this option would be of great value to the current license -holders, as they would receive a windfall, which would greatly increase the value of their real property; it would absolutely run afoul of the Florida Constitution2, Section 125.35, F.S., and will very likely subject the County to legal action. II. The Proposed Articles of Incorporation: I have reviewed the proposed Articles of Incorporation of The County Club Pointe Dock Association ("Articles"). These Articles were clearly drafted to solely benefit a very small, select group of private property owners, at no apparent cost to themselves (aside for the nominal transfer and license fees). The Articles have attempted to have the appearance of equity. However, this is simply not the case. For one, the Article IV provides that any property owner of any residence located on Golfview Drive, Par Drive (lots 9 through 16), or Calcutta Drive, that is entitled to one of the Docks as shown on the membership register attached as Exhibit B shall be a Designated Member. Exhibit B is a list of current dock license -holders. It is only when a Designated Member unilaterally decides to convey a dock interest, that a property owner in Country Club Pointe may have the opportunity to come into possession. Article V, Section 3, provides in such a case, the remaining County Club Pointe owners may enter into a blind auction. This is only if a current Designated voluntarily relinquishes their interest in a dock. There is little explanation as to when a Designated Member would have their dock interest revoked. The dock association will be self - governed by three individuals, one of which would serve as Treasurer and Secretary. Their terms will last four years. 1 Source: Indian River County BOCC June 3, 2025 Meeting Minutes Z Article X, Section 11, of the Florida Constitution states: The title to lands under navigable waters, within the boundaries of the state, which have not been alienated, including beaches below mean high water lines, is held by the state, by virtue of its sovereignty, in trust for all the people. Sale of such lands may be authorized by law, but only when in the public interest. Private use of portions of such lands may be authorized by law, but only when not contrary to the public interest. Page 2 '051 Under the current proposed Dock Owners' Association, no other Country Club Pointe property owner could reasonably expect to have the opportunity to join as a Designated Member in this Dock Owners' Association and enjoy a dock. This is a self-serving document, contrary to the intent of the creation of the canal and docks, which was meant for the use and benefit of all property owners in Country Club Pointe'. Further, under Article V, Section 2, it provides that no dock may be assigned, conveyed, leased, etc., without prior, written consent of the Corporation unless a Designated Member sells their entire interest in their real property, transfers their property to a trust, or the dock certificate is transferred by operation of law (e.g., inheritance, etc.). This will have the effect of the current license -holders obtaining fee simple ownership of the docks. I cannot see how this does not violate Section 125.35, or the Florida Constitution. Last, there appear to be remaining questions regarding this relinquishment. For one, will the Dock Association be subject to ad valorem taxes or will the Designated Members' properties be assessed based on their membership rights? Who will own the riparian rights of the canal? Who will be responsible for the continued maintenance of Calcutta Drive? It would be irresponsible for the County to proceed without clearly establishing how the above will be addressed. III. Recommendation If this process is to be legal and equitable, the County should only approve the relinquishment of the Calcutta Drive Docks if such relinquishment allows all property owners within Country Club Pointe to join as members and have an equal opportunity for the use and enjoyment of the docks. As such, I recommend the following conditions to be placed on the County's relinquishment: 1. Docks should be available to all Country Club Pointe property owners who place the highest bid for a dock; and 2. Possession of a dock should not attach to the Designated Member's real property or automatically transfer upon the sale of their real property. The concept of a Dock Owners' Association is sensible; however, it must be done within the constraints of the law and with intentions and rules clearly established. It is my recommendation that the County should only approve a Dock Owners Association for the Calcutta Drive Docks if the above conditions are required. Thank you for your time and attention to this important issue. Sincerely, /s/ Angela K. Farford, Esq. On behalf of Ryan Bass 3031 Calcutta Drive, Vero Beach, Florida 32960 cc: Susan Prado, Assistant County Attorney 'On May 6, 1985, then County Attorney Gary M. Brandenburg wrote a memorandum to Art Challacombe, an Environmental Planner, stating "the canals and bulkhead system were placed within the subdivision for the benefit of all of the property owners in the subdivision." Page 3 515,10 Jennifer Shuler, County Attorney Page 4 5�5 - I Indian River County, Florida * MEMORANDUM �ORI04' File ID: 25-1091 15B, r, Indian River County Administration Complex 1801 27th Street Vero Beach, Florida 32960 indianriver.gov Type: Commissioners Matters Meeting Date: 11/18/2025 TO: Board of County Commissioners THROUGH: John T. Titkanich FROM: Deryl Loar, Commissioner DATE: November 5, 2025 SUBJECT: Quarterly Updates from County Administrator & County Attorney At the December 3, 2024 Board of County Commission Meeting, the County Administrator and County Attorney provided the members of the Board with an objective overview of their tenures that included their achievements, obstacles, and future vision. The Board unanimously agreed that the County Administrator and County Attorney would return to provide quarterly progress reports at the Board of County Commissioners meeting. Commissioner Loar is requesting an update from both John Titkanich, County Administrator and Jennifer Shuler, County Attorney regarding their achievements, obstacles and future vision. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Present Updates. Indian River County, Florida Page 1 of 1 Printed on 11/13/2025 pow 6y Legistar-