HomeMy WebLinkAbout12/17/1996MINUTLtMATTACHED �
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
A G E N D A
TUESDAY, DECEMBER 17,1996
9:00 A.M. - COUNTY COMMISSION CHAMBER
County Administration Building
1840 25th Street
Vero Beach, Florida
COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
Fran B. Adams, Chairman (District 1)
Carolyn K. Eggert, Vice Chairman (District 2)
Caroline D. Ginn (District 5)
Kenneth R. Macht (District 3)
John W. Tippin (District 4)
James E. Chandler, County Administrator
Charles P. Vitunac, County Attorney
Jeffrey K. Barton, Clerk to the Board
9:00 a.m. 1. CALL TO ORDER BACKUP
PAGES
2. INVOCATION None
3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE - Comm. Kenneth R.Macht
4. ADDITIONS to the AGENDA/EMERGENCY ITEMS
1. Item 7-P, Appointment of John Tippin to Juvenile Justice
Council.
2. Item 7-Q, Richard R. Aldrich's Public Official's Bond.
3. Item 13-A, Discussion of County's Ethics Ordinance.
5. PROCLAMATION and PRESENTATIONS
Presentation of Proclamation to Ann Robinson on Her
Retirement Effective Dec. 31, 1996 1
6. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
A. Special Meeting of Nov. 12, 1996 (EAR)
B. Special Meeting of Nov. 13, 1996 (Tower Workshop)
C. Regular Meeting of Nov. 19, 1996
7. CONSENT AGENDA
A. Received & Placed on File in Office of Clerk to
the Board: Supv. of Elections Notice of Change in
Polling Place Location - Precinct 23 moved to
Gifford Complex, 4695 28th Court
B. Certificate of Retirement Award for David J.
Cain, Sr. 2
C. Approval of Warrants
(memorandum dated December 5, 1996) 3-9 `
4 i
�p �P�a
1 AGE ` .
r
p>.
An fl
7. CONSENT AGENDA (cont'd ): BACKUP
PAGES
D. Approval of Surety Bond for Sheriff Gary
Wheeler 10-11
E. Appointment to Economic Development
Council
(memorandum dated December 11, 1996) 12-16
F. Firearms Range and Old Courthouse Committees
(memorandum dated December 10, 1996) 17
a
G. Approval to Amend Elections Budget
(memorandum dated December 10, 1996) 18
H. GHA, Harbor Pointe's Request for Final PD
Plat Approval for Harbor Pointe at Grand
Harbor (Plat 18)
(memorandum dated December 10, 1996) 19-23
I. I.R.C. Horizontal Control Network
(memorandum dated December 11, 1996) 24-27
J. Dock License Agreement - Country Club
Pointe S/D
(memorandum dated December 9, 1996) 28-31
K. Cancellation of Outstanding Taxes
Property Purchased for County Use
(memorandum dated December 9, 1996) 32-44
L. Grant of Easement of 10 Foot Strip of Land
Lying Between the I.R. Mall and the I.R.
Square Developments
(memorandum dated December 9, 1996) 45-49
M. Approval of "Amendment H to Option Agreement
for Sale and Purchase" of 34 Atlantic Gulf Com-
munities (AGC) Sebastian Highlands Scrub Lots
(memorandum dated December 10, 1996) 50-55
N. Approval of Amendment to Option Agreement for
Sale and Purchase of the Fischer -St. Sebastian
River LAAC Site
(memorandum dated December 10, 1996) 56-59
O. Annual Contributions Voucher for Payment
Housing Authority
(memorandum dated December 11, 1996) 59A -59L
8. CONSTITUTIONAL OFFICERS and
GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES
Sheriff Gary C. Wheeler - Request for BCC Approval of
Two Additional Positions to Sheriff s Office
(letter dated December 11, 1996) 60-65
9:05 A.M. 9. PUBLIC ITEMS
A. PUBLIC HEARINGS
1. Proposed Resolution Authorizing X L
Vision, Inc. to Issue Revenue Bonds
Not to Exceed $5,000,000
(memorandum dated December 10, 1996) 66-71
9. PUBLIC ITEMS (cont'd.): BACKUP
PAGES
A. PUBLIC HEARINGS
2. Proposed Resolution Authorization and
Interlocal Agreement and the Issuance of
Revenue Bonds Not to Exceed $60,000,000
by Escambia Housing Authority
(memorandum dated December 10, 1996) 72-88
3. Stonebridge, Inc.'s Request for Planned
Development Special Exception and Pre-
liminary Plat Approval for a Development
to be Known as Stonebridge North
(memorandum dated December 11, 1996) 89-101
4. Second Hearing for LDR Amendments Not
Related to Communications Towers
(memorandum dated December 10, 1996) 102-126
5. Consideration of the I.R.C. Comprehensive
Plan Evaluation and Appraisal Report
(memorandum dated December 6, 1996) 127-138
6. Horizon Glen Outlet Center's Request for
Special Exception Use Conceptual Plan
Approval to Construct a Driving Range,
Clubhouse, 9 Hole Golf Course, and
Associated Improvements
(memorandum dated December 10, 1996) 139-160
7. Continuation of the Department of Utility
Services Request for Special Exception Use
Approval to Expand the South County Waste-
water Treatment Plant
(memorandum dated December 11, 1996) 161-185
8. Idlewylde Corp. Inc.'s Request for Conceptual
Planned Development Special Exception Use
Approval and Appeal of Preliminary Planned
Development Denial for a 109 Lot Single
Family Planned Development to be Known as
The Sanctuary
(memorandum dated December 11, 1996)
B. PUBLIC DISCUSSION ITEMS
None
10. COUNTY ADMIMSTRATOR'S MATTERS
None
11. DEPARTMENTAL MATTERS
A. Community Development
None
186-209
11. DEPARTMENTAL MATTERS (cont'd.):
B. Emergencv Services
Ranking of Computer Aided Dispatch (CAD)
Vendors Responding to RFP #6077; Authori-
zation to Negotiate with Logistic Systems, Inc.
Pursuant to CCNA; Approval of Systems Consult-
ing Contract with Barry Strock Consulting Services,
Inc.; and Funding for Consulting Services
(memorandum dated December 9, 1996)
C. General Services
.�� Pub 0
BACKUP
PAGES
210-226
Judicial Reception
(memorandum dated December 9, 1996) 227-229
D. Leisure Services
None
E. Office of Management and Budget
None
F. Personnel
1. Workers' Compensation Managed Care
Arrangement
(memorandum dated December 10, 1996) 230-233E
2. Drug -Free Workplace Program
(memorandum dated December 11, 1996) 234-249
G. Public Works
1. Request Permission for Sea Oaks P.O.A. to
Use North Parcel of Wabasso Beach Park
for Access to Beach
(memorandum dated December 11, 1996) 250-250A
2. An Update on the Requests for I.R.C. to
Issue F.S. Chapter 161.085(3) Emergency
Permits for Construction of Seawalls Along
South Beach
(memorandum dated December 11, 1996) 251-259
H. Utilities
1. Utility Workshop Meeting
(memorandum dated December 11, 1996) 260
2. Armory Building Water & Sewer Main
Extension Final Pay Request
(memorandum dated December 3, 1996) 261-268
3. Louisiana Ave. Water Main (Main Street
to County Rd. 512, Resolutions I and 11
(memorandum dated December 6, 1996) 269-282
4. Cornerstone Select Homes, Inc., Developer's
Agreement for Construction of the Sebastian
Model Home Center
(memorandum dated December 6, 1996) 283-290
11. DEPARTMENTAL MATTERS (cont'd.): BACKUP
H. Utilities (cont'd.):
5. 26th Street Reuse Water Line Relocation Labor
Contract - Change Order No. 1 & Final Payment
(memorandum dated December 9, 1996) 291-302
12. COUNTY ATTORNEY
None
13. COMMISSIONERS ITEMS
A. Chairman Fran B. Adams
B. Vice Chairman Carolyn K. Eggert
Library Support
(memorandum dated December 9, 1996)
C. Commissioner Caroline D. Ginn
D. Commissioner Kenneth R. Macht
E. Commissioner John W. Tippin
14. SPECIAL DISTRICTSBOARDS
A. Emergency Services District
None
B. Solid Waste Disposal District
None
C. Environmental Control Board
None
15. ADJOURNMENT
303-304
Anyone who may wish to appeal any decision which may be made at this meeting will need
to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made which includes the testimony and
evidence upon which the appeal will be based.
Anyone who needs a special accommodation for this meeting may contact the county's
Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) coordinator at 567-8000 x408 at least 48 hours in advance
of meeting.
Meeting broadcast live on TCI Cable Channel 13 - rebroadcast 5:00 p.m. Thursday through
5: 00 p. m. Friday
Falcon Cable Channel 35 - rebroadcast Friday evening
.0 �.
I
Pq
INDEX TO MINUTES
DECEMBER 17, 1996
REGULAR MEETING OF BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
ADDITIONS TO THE AGENDA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
PROCLAMATION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
APPROVAL OF MINUTES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
CONSENT
AGENDA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3
A.
Reports . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3
B.
Certificate of Retirement Award for David J. Cain,
Sr. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3
C.
List of Warrants . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
4
D.
Approval of Surety Bond for Sheriff Gary Wheeler
9
E.
Appointment to Economic Development Council - Linda
Pell . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
10
F.
Firearms Range Committee and Old Courthouse Ad Hoc
Committee . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
10
G.
Approval to Amend Elections Budget . . . ... . . .
11
H.
GHA, Harbor Pointe's Request for Final PD Plat
Approval - Harbor Pointe at Grand Harbor (Plat
18) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
12
I.
Indian River County Horizontal Control Network
13
J.
Dock License Agreement - Country Club Pointe S/D -
Hoda Shukri Dodge . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
16
K.
Cancellation of Outstanding Taxes - Property
Purchased for County Use . . . . . . . . . . . . .
16
L.
Grant of Easement - 10 Foot Strip of Land Between
Indian River Mall and Indian River Square
Developments - Lowe's Home Center, Inc. - Indian
River Mall Associates - Indian River Square Limited
Partnership - Dayton Hudson Corporation . . . . . .
29
M.
"Amendment II to Option Agreement" - 34 Atlantic
Gulf Communities (AGC) Sebastian Highlands Scrub
Lots . . . . . . . . . . . .3
. . . . . . . . . .
0
N.
Amendment to Option Agreement - Fischer - St.
Sebastian River LAAC Site . . . . . . . . . . . .
31
O.
Annual Contributions Voucher - Housing Authority
32
P.
Juvenile Justice Council - John Tippin . . . . .. .
33
Q.
Public Official Bond - Richard R. Aldrich, Trustee,,
Indian River County Hospital District . . . . . . .
33
REQUEST
BY SHERIFF WHEELER FOR HELICOPTER PILOT AND CIVILIAN
MECHANIC
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
e
34
1
nu
®
�
r
PUBLIC HEARING - RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING XL VISION, INC. TO
ISSUE REVENUE BONDS NOT TO EXCEED $5,000,000 . . . . . . 38
PUBLIC HEARING - ESCAMBIA HOUSING AUTHORITY INTERLOCAL
AGREEMENT AND ISSUANCE OF REVENUE BONDS NOT TO EXCEED .
$60,000,000 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42
PUBLIC HEARING - STONEBRIDGE, INC. - REQUEST FOR PLANNED
DEVELOPMENT SPECIAL EXCEPTION AND PRELIMINARY PLAT
APPROVAL FOR STONEBRIDGE NORTH . . . . . . . . . . . . . 49
SECOND PUBLIC HEARING - LDR AMENDMENTS NOT RELATED TO
COMMUNICATIONS TOWERS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 55
PUBLIC HEARING - INDIAN RIVER COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
EVALUATION AND APPRAISAL. REPORT . . . . . . . . . .�. . 78
PUBLIC HEARING - HORIZON` GLEN OUTLET CENTER - SPECIAL
EXCEPTION USE CONCEPTUAL PLAN APPROVAL - DRIVING RANGE,
CLUBHOUSE, 9 HOLE GOLF COURSE, AND ASSOCIATED
IMPROVEMENTS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 82
PUBLIC HEARING - TABLED FROM DECEMBER 3, 1996 - UTILITY
SERVICES REQUEST FOR SPECIAL EXCEPTION USE APPROVAL -
EXPAND SOUTH COUNTY WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT . . . . . 89
PUBLIC HEARING - IDLEWYLDE CORP., INC. - REQUEST FOR
CONCEPTUAL PD SPECIAL EXCEPTION USE APPROVAL AND APPEAL
OF PRELIMINARY PD DENIAL - 109 LOT SINGLE-FAMILY PLANNED
DEVELOPMENT - THE SANCTUARY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 93
RFP #6077 COMPUTER AIDED DISPATCH (CAD) VENDORS; LOGISTIC
SYSTEMS, INC. NEGOTIATIONS PURSUANT TO CCNA;, SYSTEMS
CONSULTING CONTRACT WITH BARRY STROCK CONSULTING
SERVICES, INC. AND FUNDING . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 102
JUDICIAL RECEPTION AT COURTHOUSE - JANUARY 13, 1997 . . . . .
105
WORKERS' COMPENSATION MANAGED CARE ARRANGEMENT - CORVEL
CORPORATION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
105
DRUG-FREE WORKPLACE PROGRAM . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
107
SEA OAKS PROPERTY OWNERS ASSOCIATION - REQUEST TO USE NORTH
PARCEL OF WABASSO BEACH PARK FOR ACCESS TO BEACH . . . .
108
SEAWALLS ALONG SOUTH BEACH - UPDATE ON REQUESTS FOR F.S.
CHAPTER 161.085(3) EMERGENCY PERMITS - GERSTNER . . . .
109
SCHEDULING OF UTILITY WORKSHOP MEETING . . . . . . . . . . .
111
RIO MAR YACHTS, INC. (OLD ARMORY BUILDING) WATER & SEWER MAIN
EXTENSION - DRIVEWAYS, INC. - FINAL PAY REQUEST . . . .
112
LOUISIANA AVENUE WATER MAIN (MAIN STREET TO CR -512) -
RESOLUTIONS I AND II . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
113
CORNERSTONE SELECT HOMES, INC. - DEVELOPER'S AGREEMENT FOR
CONSTRUCTION OF SEBASTIAN MODEL HOME CENTER . . . . . .
129
26TH STREET REUSE WATER LINE RELOCATION LABOR CONTRACT -
DRIVEWAYS, INC. - CHANGE ORDER NO. 1 AND FINAL PAYMENT .
130
COUNTY'S ETHICS ORDINANCE - STATE GIFT LAW - DISCUSSION . . .
131
LIBRARY SUPPORT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
131
77
2
d
December 17, 1996
The Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County,
Florida, met in Regular Session at the County Commission Chambers,
1840 25th Street, Vero Beach, Florida, on Tuesday, December 17,
1996, at 9:00 a.m. Present were Fran B. Adams, Chairman; Carolyn
K. Eggert, Vice Chairman; Kenneth R. Macht; John W. Tippin; and
Caroline D. Ginn. Also present were James E. Chandler, County
Administrator; Charles P. Vitunac, County Attorney; and Patricia
"PJ" Jones, Deputy Clerk.
Chairman Adams called the meeting to order and announced that
this will be the last meeting of the Board for 1996. Reverend Joe
Brooks of 20th Avenue Church of God gave the Invocation, and
Commissioner Macht led the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag.
ADDITIONS TO THE AGENDA
Chairman Adams requested two additions to today's Agenda:
1. Item 7-Q, Richard R. Aldrich's Public
Official's Bond.
2. Item 13-A, discussion regarding the County's Ethics
Ordinance.
Commissioner Eggert requested the addition of Item 7-P,
appointment of John Tippin to the Juvenile Justice Council.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by
Commissioner Ginn, the Board unanimously added the
above items to the Agenda.
PROCLAMATION
Chairman Adams presented the following Proclamation to Ann
Robinson, Supervisor of Elections, on her retirement effective.
December 31, 1996.
Mrs. Robinson thanked the Board and stated it has been an
honor to serve the County.
Commissioner Tippin remarked that Ann will be missed, and
Chairman Adams wished her good luck and commented that Texas' gain
is the County's loss.
DECEMBER 17, 1996 1
0o .F .
f^
PROCLAMATION
HONORING ANN ROBINSON
SUPERVISOR OF ELECTIONS
ON HER RETIREMENT
EFFECTIVE DECEMBER 31, 1996
WHEREAS, ANN ROBINSON has announced her retirement as the
Supervisor of Elections effective December 31, 1996 and we wish to
express our appreciation for her outstanding career on behalf of
local government; and
WHEREAS, in November, 1984, ANN ROBINSON was elected the
Supervisor of Elections, taking office in January, 1985 and she has
continued in that position until.her retirement.
WHEREAS, ANN ROBINSON moved from Midland, Texas to Indian
River County in October, 1972; and
WHEREAS, ANN worked for a brief period in the Property
Appraiser's Office and was very active in school board meetings, as
well as serving on numerous boards and committees throughout the
community. The Taxpayer's Association of Indian River County
awarded ANN the coveted Miser of the Year Award in 1988 and the Ted
Brown Award in 1996.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT PROCLAIMED BY THE BOARD OF COUN'T'Y
COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that the Board
expresses its deep appreciation for the services ANN ROBINSON has
performed on behalf of Indian River County.
BE IT FURTHER PROCLAIMED that our heartfelt wishes for a happy
retirement and success in future endeavors go with her.
Dated this 17 day of December, 1996.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
ca,, 6 Com
FRAN B. ADAMS
CHAIRMAN
DECEMBER 17, 1996 2
APPROVAL OF M U'rES
The Chairman asked if there were any corrections or additions
to the Minutes of the Special Meetings of November 12, 1996 and
November 13, 1996. There were none.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by
Commissioner Tippin, the Board unanimously approved
the Minutes of the Special Meetings of November 12,
1996 and November 13, 1996, as written.
The Chairman asked if there were any corrections or additions
to the Minutes of the Regular Meeting of November 19, 1996. There
were none.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Ginn, SECONDED by
Commissioner Eggert, the Board unanimously approved
the Minutes of the Regular Meeting of November 19,
1996, as written.
CONSENT AGENDA
Chairman Adams requested that Item 7-I be pulled for
discussion, and County Attorney Vitunac requested that Item 7-N be
pulled for discussion.
A. Reports
Received and placed on file in the office of the Clerk to the
Board:
1. Supervisor of Elections Notice of Change in
Polling Place Location - Precinct 23 moved to
Gifford Complex, 4695 28th Court
B. Certificate of Retirement Award for David T. Cain, Sr.
Chairman Adams presented the following Certificate of
Retirement Award to David J. Cain, Sr., 13 year employee of the
Road and Bridge Department:
3
DECEMBER 17, 19963 lot) "
l
0his to to ter ft *at
i8 btrebg preaenteb this
Refiranjent Awarb
y
for outaftmbing performance Ani, faithful
serine to
7'�i�/ - �Q,rc�2•�i ����z�rrt�ik3•ionz��ui
for gears of aeruite
on this
-121% fag �ec�n a 19 96
Jaz6es W. Davis, P.E. Fran B. Adams, Chairman
Director of Public Works_ Board of -County Commissioners___
C. List of Warrants
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of December 5, 1996:
TO: HONORABLE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
DATE: DECEMBER 5, 1996
SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF WARRANTS
FROM: EDWIN M. FRY, JR., FINANCE DIRECTOR
In compliance with Chapter 136.06, Florida Statutes, all warrants issued
by the Board of County Commissioners are to be recorded in the Board minutes.
Approval is requested for the attached list of warrants, issued by the Clerk
to the Board, for the time period of December 4 to December 5. 1996.
DECEMBER 17, 1996 4
CHECK
NAME
CHECK
CHECK
NUMBER
DATE
AMOUNT
0018016 BARTON, JEFFREY K -CLERK
12/04/96
21.00
0213861 AERO PRODUCTS CORP
12/05/96
332.90
0213862 AIRBOURNE EXPRESS
12/05/96
10.45
0213863
AEROSPACE EXPRESS
12/05/96
189.00
0213864
A T & T
12/05/96
34.99
0213865
ALL RITE WATER CONDITIONING
12/05/96
71.50
0213866
ASAP SOFTWARE EXPRESS, INC
12/05/96
474.94
0213867
ADVANCED MEDICAL & PHARMACY
12/05/96
128.55
0213868
ADDRESS N' MAIL, INC
12/05/96
1,959.73
0213869
A T & T
12/05/96
17.16
0213870
ATLANTIC COASTAL TITLE CORP
12/05/96
1,095,389.08
0213871
ALBERTSON'S
12/05/96
59.72
0213872
ASAP COMPRESSORS
12/05/96
770.00
0213873
AIKENS, FRANK
12/05/96
75.00
0213874
ALEXANDER, MIKE
12/05/96
30.00
0213875
AMMEDIATE BAIL BONDS OF
12/05/96
1,897.00
0213876
BAIRD, JOSEPH A
12/05/96
212.37
0213877
BAKER & TAYLOR, INC
12/05/96
2,057.57
0213878
BAKER BROTHERS, INC
12/05/96
1,122.39
0213879
BOLING, STAN
12/05/96
6.00
0213880
BELLSOUTH MOBILITY
12/05/96
15.71
0213881
BARTON, JEFFREY K -CLERK
12/05/96
9,401.50
0213882
BARTON, JEFFREY K -CLERK
12/05/96
50.00
0213883
B & B INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY CO.
12/05/96
1,918.67
0213884
BARTON, JEFFREY K -CLERK
12/05/96
49.00
0213885
BARTON, JEFFREY K -CLERK
12/05/96
220.00
0213886
BRODA, JANICE C
12/05/96
102.66
0213887
BLATUS, JAMES
12/05/96
704.02
0213888
BOYNTON PUMP & IRRIGATION-
12/05/96
5.72
0213889
BLAKESLEE MAINTENANCE
12/05/96
200.00
0213890
BAKER & TAYLOR ENTERTAINMENT
12/05/96
54.90
0213891
BELLSOUTH
12/05/96
5,310.90
0213892
BARKER, LILLIAN
12/05/96
442.75
0213893
BREVARD DRUG SCREENING SERVICE
12/05/96
30.00
0213894
BRENNAN, RANDALL
12/05/96
30.00
0213895
CAREWAY'S RUBBER STAMP &
12/05/96
19.40
0213896
CHANDLER EQUIPMENT CO., INC
12/05/96
213.85
0213897
COLKITT SHEET METAL & AIR, INC
12/05/96
26.04
0213898
COMMUNICATIONS INT, INC
12/05/96
327.80
0213899
CONSTRUCTION HYDRAULICS
12/05/96
351.81
0213900
CREASER, GEORGE
12/05/96
30.00
0213901
CLARK WATER CONDITIONING
12/05/96
71.25
0213902
COASTAL FUELS MARKETING, INC
12/05/96
7,522.34
0213903
CUSTOM CARRIAGES, INC
12/05/96
1,041.53
0213904
CHIVERS NORTH AMERICA
12/05/96
69.40
0213905
COOGAN,-MAUREEN AND
12/05/96
540.20
0213906
CLIFFORD, MIKE
12/05/96
100.00
0213907
CUSTOM PUBLISHING SERVICES,INC
12/05/96
159.00
0213908
CENTRAL A/C & REFRIG SUPPLY,
12/05/96
10.78
0213909
DAVES SPORTING GOODS
12/05/96
286.43
0213910
DELTA SUPPLY CO
12/05/96
87.50
0213911
DUN & BRADSTREET
12/05/96
473.25
0213912
DOW, HOWELL, GILMORE,
12/05/96
600.00
0213913
DATA SUPPLIES, INC
12/05/96
164.84
0213914
DISABLED AMERICAN VETERAN
12/05/96
15.00
0213915
DISCOUNT AUTO PARTS
12/05/96
52.25
0213916
DAVIDSON TITLES, INC
12/05/96
0213917
DRUM, TERRY
12/05/96
16.20
0213918
DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS &
12,/05/96
80.10
0213919
DEMCO MEDIA
12/05/96
50.00
0213920
DOLMAN TECHNOLOGIES
12/05/96
11.84
0213921
DADE PAPER COMPANY
12/05/96
13,500.00
0213922
E -Z BREW COFFEE SERVICE, INC
12/05/96
224.29
0213923
EAST COAST LUMBER
12/05/96
295.75
0213924
ETTER, TONY
12/05/96
172 .15
72.00
0213925
EBSCO SUBSCRIPTION SERVICES
12/05/96
0213926
EDUCATIONAL DIRECTORIES, INC
12/05/96
53.90
0213927
ELPEX, INC
12/05/96
165.00
0213928
ENVIRONMENTAL LEARNING
12/05/96
631.71
0213929
EMERGENCY LINEN SUPPLY CO
12/05/96
500.00
929.13
DECEMBER 17, 1996 5
;�
CHECK
NAME
CHECK
CHECK
NUMBER
DATE
AMOUNT
0213930
FLORIDA EAST COAST RAILWAY CO
12/05/96
66.40
0213931
FLORIDA COCA-COLA BOTTLING CO
12/05/96
162.50
0213932
F P & L
12/05/96
4,320.23
0213933
FLORIDA RIBBON & CARBON
12/05/96
72.00
0213934
FOURTH DISTRICT COURT OF
12/05/96
250.00
0213935
FRASER ENGINEERING & TESTING
12/05/96
559.00
0213936
FLORIDA EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS
12/05/96
30.00
0213937
FLOWERS BAKING COMPANY OF
12/05/96
95.94
0213938
FLORIDA TIRE RECYCLING, INC
12/05/96
680.40
0213939
FLINN, SHEILA I
12/05/96
28.00
0213940
FALZONE, KATHY
12/05/96
6.00
0213941
FINKLIN, WILLIE JR
12/05/96
49.88
0213942
FLORIDA TECH
12/05/96
13,486.10
0213943
FLOOD, STEPHEN
12/05/96
30.00
0213944
GATOR LUMBER COMPANY
12/05/96
15.07
0213945
GAYLORD BROTHERS, INC
12/05/96
161.02
0213946
GEORGE W FOWLER CO
12/05/96
45.31
0213947
GENERAL MEDICAL CORP
12/05/96
1,345.47
0213948
G. NEIL COMPANIES
12/05/96
5.82
0213949
GNB TECHNOLOGIES
12/05/96
130.42
0213950
GIFFORD COMMUNITY CENTER
12/05/96
6,514.82
0213951
GILLETTE, TIMOTHY
12/05/96
30.00
0213952
GREEN, WILLIAM
12/05/96
30.00
0213953
H W WILSON CO
12/05/96
134.00
0213954
HARRIS SANITATION
12/05/96
1,081.20
0213955
HARRISON UNIFORMS
12/05/96
1,393.13
0213956.
HEATH, CHARLES W
12/05/96
6.00
0213957
HILL DONNELLY CORPORATION
12/05/96
183.18
0213958
HUMANE SOCIETY OF VERO BEACH
12/05/96
11,940.00
0213959
HACH SUPPLY
12/05/96
119.50
0213960
HELDREF PUBLICATIONS
12/05/96
25.00
0213961
HOTCHKISS, MICHAEL
12/05/96
24.00
0213962
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
12/05/96
15.00
0213963
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY SHERIFF'S
12/05/96
50.00
0213964
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY UTILITIES
12/05/96
84.27
0213965
INDIAN RIVER MEMORIAL HOSPITAL
12/05/96
171.00
0213966
INDIAN RIVER MEMORIAL HOSPITAL
12/05/96
50.39
0213967
INGRAM
12/05/96
1,401.11
0213968
INDIAN RIVER CONTRACTING CORP
12/05/96
500.00
0213969
INFORMATION ACCESS CO
12/05/96
40,964.00
0213970
INTERNATIONAL SOLID WASTE ASOC
12/05/96
137.00
0213971
IZOD GOLF & TENNIS
12/05/96
242.28
0213972
IRVINE MECHANICAL, INC
12/05/96
583.16
0213973
INNOVATIVE NETWORK SYSTEMS
12/05/96
750.74
0213974
INTERLIGHT
12/05/96
52.96
0213975
INTERNATIONAL GOLF MANAGEMENT
12/05/96
68,333.33
0213976
IKON OFFICE SOLUTIONS
12/05/96
200.71
0213977
INTERNATIONAL MUNICIPAL
12/05/96
422.00
0213978
HOMELAND IRRIGATION CENTER
12/05/96
184.38
0213979
JACKSON ELECTRONICS
12/05/96
33.04
0213980
JANIE DEAN CHEVROLET, INC
12/05/96
276.01
0213981
JIMMY'S TREE SERVICE, INC
12/05/96
1,026.00
0213982
JIM S APPLIANCE SERVICE OF
12/05/96
80.00
0213983
JEFFERSON, RUTH
12/05/96
220.00
0213984
JUDAH, KAREN E
12/05/96
42.75
0213985
JEFFERS VET SUPPLY
12/05/96
107.85
0213986
JONES, DAVID M
12/05/96
1,490.00
0213987
JONES CHEMICALS, INC
12/05/96
180.00
0213988
JOBE, JENNIFER
12/05/96
95.00
0213989
KEATING, ROBERT M
12/05/96
6.00
0213990
KNIGHT & MATHIS, INC
12/05/96
94.26
0213991
KAUFFMANN, ALAN
12/05/96
96.00
0213992
K S M
12/05/96
250.00
0213993
KRUGER CONSTRUCTION CORP
12/05/96
1,860.00
0213994
KIRBY AUTO SUPPLY
12/05/96
1,572.43
0213995
KLOTZER, ROBERT
12/05/96
30.00
0213996
LETTS, DAVID
12/05/96
247.00
0213997
L B SMITH, INC
12/05/96
405.53
0213998
LAWYERS COOPERATIVE PUBLISHING
12/05/96
18.00
0213999
LIGHT SOURCE -TONER SUPPLY
12/05/96
371.50
0214000
LESCO, INC
12/05/96
167.91
DECEMBER 17, 1996 6
� a �
CHECK
NAME
CHECK
CHECK
NUMBER
DATE
AMOUNT
0214001 LAPSCO INC
12/05/96
172.25
0214002
LIBERTY BUSINESS MACHINES
12/05/96
300.00
0214003
LLOYD, JOHN RALPH
12/05/96
72.00
0214004
MASTELLER & MOLER ASSOC, INC
12/05/96
11,700.00
0214005
MAXWELL PLUMBING, INC
12/05/96
1,044.44
0214006
MCCAIN, WILLIAM F
12/05/96
104.12
0214007
MILLER, GWENDOLYN M
12/05/96
175.00
0214008
MITCO WATER LAB, INC
12/05/96
885.97
0214009
MOSBY & ASSOC, INC
12/05/96
1,500.00
0214010
MATRX MEDICAL REPAIR CTR
12/05/96
727.20
0214011
MIZUNO GOLF COMPANY
12/05/96
102.77
0214012
MEDIA FACTORY, INC
12/05/96
412.33
0214013
MR BOB PORTABLE TOILET
12/05/96
62.28
0214014
MAIN STREET HARDWARE, INC
12/05/96
109.20
0214015
MARC INDUSTRIES
12/05/96
93.70
0214016
MCCORD ELECTRIC
12/05/96
934.00
0214017
MEREDITH BOOKS
12/05/96
123.20
0214018
NORTH SOUTH SUPPLY
12/05/96
493.31
0214019
NEW HORIZONS OF THE TREASURE
12/05/96
2,024.68
0214020
NATIONAL GEOGRAPHIC SOCIETY
12/05/96
23.70
0214021
NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE
12/05/96
28.00
0214022
OFFICE PRODUCTS & SERVICE
12/05/96
1,517.61
0214023
OFFICE DEPOT, INC
12/05/96
634.24
0214024
PARAGON ELECTRIC, INC
12/05/96
627.00
0214025
PETERSON'S
12/05/96
13.29
0214026
PETTY CASH
12/05/96
102.20
0214027
PHILLIPS, LINDA R
12/05/96
455.00
0214028
PETTY .CASH
12/05/96
7.00
0214029
PORT PETROLEUM, INC
12/05/96
361.11
0214030
PRECISION CONTRACTING
12/05/96
- 54,966.06
0214031
PERROTTA MD, RICHARD
12/05/96
60.00
0214032
PERFORMING ARTS TROUPE
12/05/96
75.00
0214033
PROFESSIONAL VIDEO
12/05/96
33.50
0214034
QUALITY BOOKS, INC
12/05/96
101.02
0214035
RADIO SHACK ACCT RECEIVABLE
12/05/96
28.98
0214036
RIFKIN, SHELDON H PHD
12/05/96
500.00
0214037
RUSSELL CONCRETE, INC
12/05/96
490.00
0214038
REARDON, RICK
12/05/96
117.00
0214039
SCOTTY'S, INC
12/05/96
574.20
0214040
SEBASTIAN BUSINESS SUPPLY, INC
12/05/96
42.64
0214041
SOUTHERN CULVERT, DIV OF
12/05/96
462.36
0214042
SUN COAST CLEANING SUPPLIES,
12/05/96
20.64
0214043
SUNCOAST WELDING SUPPLIES, INC
12/05/96
27.97
0214044
SERVICE REFRIGERATION CO, INC
12/05/96
83.00
0214045
SIMON & SCHUSTER CONSUMER
12/05/96
157.18
0214046
SOUTHERN JANITOR SUPPLY
12/05/96
156.75
0214047
SHADY OAK ANIMAL CLINIC
12/05/96
109.50
0214048
SKILLPATH, INC
12/05/96
20.00
0214049
SUN BELT MEDICAL SUPPLY, INC
12/05/96
1,492.90
0214050
SUPERIOR PRINTING
12/05/96
306.60
0214051
SYSCO FOOD SERVICE
12/05/96
278.25
0214052
SEBASTIAN POLICE DEPARTMENT
12/05/96
25.00
0214053
SIMS, MATTHEW
12/05/96
102.95
0214054
SOUTHERN LOCK AND SUPPLY CO
12/05/96
179.36
0214055
7 -ELEVEN
12/05/96
2.31
0214056
SEABREEZE PRINT SHOP INC
12/05/96
99.00
0214057
SECURITYLINK FROM AMERITECH
12/05/96
996.00
0214058
SESSIONS, ALESIA
12/05/96
205.00
0214059
SOUTHWIND GRAPHICS
12/05/96
24.50
0214060
STAPLES, INC
12/05/96
239.97
0214061 TAYLOR RENTAL CENTER
12/05/96
138.50
0214062 TITLEIST DRAWER CS
12/05/96
3,226.20
0214063 TREASURE COAST REFUSE CORP
12/05/96
175.32
0214064 TEXACO REFINING AND
12/05/96
973.59
0214065 TIMOTHY ROSE CONTRACTING, INC
12/05/96
14,030.00
0214066
TRANE PARTS CENTER OF SOUTH
12/05/96
474.06
0214067 TATTEGRAIN, RAYMOND
12/05/96
50.00
0214068 TORRES, JILL
12/05/96
8787.00
0214069 U S TELECOM, INC
12/05/96*
.50
5
0214070 UNIVERSAL SIGNS & ACCESSORIES
12/05/96
750.50
0214071 US GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE
12/05/96
38.00
DECEMBER 17, 1996 7
t P 14
CHECK
NAME
CHECK
CHECK
NUMBER
DATE
AMOUNT
0214072
VELDE FORD, INC
12/05/96
3,002.25
0214073
VERO BEACH PRESS JOURNAL
12/05/96
53.70
0214074
VERO BEACH PRESS JOURNAL
12/05/96
225.72
0214075
VERO BEACH PRINTING CO
12/05/96
61.50
0214076
VERO BEACH, CITY OF
12/05/96
37,699.35
0214077
VERO CHEMICAL DISTRIBUTORS,INC
12/05/96
479.00
0214078
VERO LAWNMOWER CENTER, INC
12/05/96
78.20
0214079
VERO BEACH, CITY OF
12/05/96
48.92
0214080
VVA CHAPTER 567
12/05/96
20.00
0214081
VERO BEACH POLICE DEPARTMENT
12/05/96
50.00
0214082
VERO BEARING & BOLT
12/05/96
128.76
0214083
VOLUNTEER ACTION COMMITTEE
12/05/96
75.00
0214084
WAL-MART STORES, INC
12/05/96
20.00
0214085
WAL-MART STORES, INC
12/05/96
203.44
0214086
WEST PUBLISHING COMPANY
12/05/96
201.02
0214087
WHITTON, HENRY G ESQ
12/05/96
3,107.00
0214088
WOLSTENHOLME, SHIRLEY
12/05/96
35.32
0214089
W W GRAINGER, INC
12/05/96
217.84
0214090
WIGINTON FIRE SPRINKLERS,INC
12/05/96
1;950.00
0214091
WILLHOFF, PATSY
12/05/96
76.00
0214092
WM THIES & SONS, INC
12/05/96
193.10
0214093
WHEELER, GARY SHERIFF
12/05/96
4,998.38
0214094
WILDLIFE PHARMACEUTICALS
12/05/96
488.89
0214095
WALKER, KEITH
12/05/96
156.00
0214096
WOLFE, MEGAN
12/05/96
33.25
0214097
WELLS, JOSEPH
12/05/96
5.00
0214098
WALKER, DONALD
12/05/96
30.00
0214099
WAL*MART STORE 1068
12/05/96
119.97
0214100
YAVORSKY'S TRUCK SERVICE,INC
12/05/96
1,331.04
0214101
ZEPHYRHILLS SPRING WATER CO
12/05/96
9.50
0214102
WILMOTH, SUSAN E
12/05/96
50.00
0214103
HILL, ALAN L
12/05/96
52.58
0214104
GLENDALE INVESTMENT GROUP
12/05/96
100.00
0214105
COUNTRYSIDE S MOBILE
12/05/96
600.00
0214106
SULLIVAN, RUTH
12/05/96
105.10
0214107
MANCINI, NICHOLAS
12/05/96
40.00
0214108
MASSI JR, WILLIAM V
12/05/96
40.00
0214109
CLARK, EASTMAN
12/05/96
53.22
0214110
RICHARDS, WILLIAM A
12/05/96
54.27
0214111
EVANS, HAZEL
12/05/96
105.68
0214112
KING, KIRBY
12/05/96
105.10
0214113
FRAWLEY, PATRICK J
12/05/96
105.18
0214114
LOVE, JERRY D
12/05/96
9.43
0214115
SURLES, MAJOR
12/05/96
34.51
0214116
DE NICHOLA, ANGELO F
12/05/96
34.63
0214117
R ZORC & SONS BUILDERS INC
12/05/96
22.56
0214118
JACKSON JR, JOHN A
12/05/96
36.37
0214119
VISION LAND INC
12/05/96
128.71
0214120
WRIGHT, JIM
12/05/96
34.56
0214121
BORCHERS, JEAN
12/05/96
43.67
0214122
LA PORTE, ROBERT
12/05/96
59.59
0214123
MC CARVER, ROBERT
12/05/96
38.30
0214124
FONTANA, JOSEPH & MARY
12/05/96
29.63
0214125
JULIN, PAUL
12/05/96
38.47
0214126
HORTON, LESLIE
12/05/96
31.44
0214127
SCHERER, SUZANNE
12/05/96
33.91
0214128
CURRY, REGINA D
12/05/96
58.00
0214129
LUCERO, ALEXANDER V
12/05/96
40.17
0214130
ANDO BUILDING CORP
12/05/96
13.42
0214131
LOUCKS, CAROL E
12/05/96
24.83
0214132
BROWN, CARRIE
12/05/96
32.33
0214133
DAVI, ROSE
12/05/96
46.04
0214134
BACON, MALICCIAH
12/05/96
19.14
0214135
TURLINGTON, CHRISTA
12/05/96
17.07
0214136
RUSSELL, JAMES
12/05/96
45.31
0214137
KARACHUM, MARY KAY
12/05/96
12.38
0214138
JONES, DIANA L
12/05/96
13.39
0214139
BURKE, RAYMOND
12/05/96
73.29
0214140
NICHOLAS, YVETTE
12/05/96
8.18
0214141
SILVA, CHARLES D
12/05/96
38.43
0214142
TAYLOR, SIERREA L
12/05/96
2.42
DECEMBER 17, 1996
8
CHECK NAME
NUMBER
CHECK
DATE
CHECK
AMOUNT
0214143
HARDING, TRAVIS
12/05/96
1.45
0214144
LEETS, LINDA L
12/05/96
34.70
0214145
RUSSCO, INC
12/05/96
61.84
0214146
CAGGIANO, A
12/05/96
11.70
0214147
LAKEWOOD VILLAGE
12/05/96
92.01
1,483,052.99
ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by
Commissioner Ginn, the Board unanimously approved
the list of Warrants as issued by the Clerk to the
Board for the period from December 4, 1996 through
December 5, 1996, as recommended by staff.
D. Approval of Surety Bond for Sheriff Gary Wheeler
1996:
The Board reviewed a Public Official's Bond of November 8,
Florida
%1��y _
Western Surety Company
PUBLIC OFFICIAL'S BOND
STATE OF FLORIDA
County of
Indian River as
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS; Bond No. 42428005
That we, Garr Wheeler
as Principal, and WESTERN SURETY COMPANY, as Surety, are held and firmly bound
unto the Governor of the State of Florida. and his successors in office, in the sum of
Ten Thousand and no/100 DOLLARS($ 10.000.00 l
lawful money, for the payment whereof, well and truly to be made, we do bind ourselves, our and each of our
heirs, executors and administrators, jointly and severally, firmly by these presents.
Sealed with our seals, and dated this Rth day of
The condition of the above obligation is such,- that whereas, the above bounden
Gary Wheeler was on the day of
A.D. , elected to the oMce of Sheriff
of the COtirit' of Indian River State of Florida for the term of office
beginning on January 7, 1997 and ending on January 2, 2001
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CONDITION OF THE FOREGOING OBLIGATION IS -SUCH, that if the
Principal shall faithfully perform such duties as may be imposed on him by law and shall honestly account for
all money that may come into his own hands in his official capacity during the said term, then this obligation
shall be void; otherwise it shall remain in force.
This bond is further conditioned that the liability of the Surety shall be'fully terminated as to future acts of
the Principal thirty (30) days after the receipt by the Obligee, of the Surety's written notice of cancellation.
Signed, sealed and delivered in the presence of
(as to the'Prtncipal)
%w to Ne Surety)
Countersigned
By-71L.,7�. JtlknG�
Florida Resident Agent
Folie 1345-w-5-91
DECEMBER 17, 1996
9
Principal
WESTERN SURETY COMPANY
Y � ,
By
E. Whelden. Asst. Sec.
j-00 PuL,
PAL, 17
ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by
Commissioner Ginn, the Board unanimously approved
the Surety Bond for Sheriff Gary Wheeler, as
recommended by staff.
E. Appointment to Economic Development Council - Linda Pell
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of December 11, 1996:
To: Board of County Commissioners
From: Carolyn K. Eggert L, &
Vice Chairman, Board of County Commissioners
Chairman, Economic Development Council
Date: December 11, 1996
Re: Appointment to Economic Development Council
Please appoint Linda Pell from the American Business Women's
Association to replace Bayard Stevens in the "civic organization"
category. She has special knowledge of the small business
challenges that we have been missing on the Economic Development
Council. Her resume is attached.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by
Commissioner Ginn, the Board unanimously approved
the appointment of Linda Pell to replace .Bayard
Stevens on the Economic Development Council, as
recommended by staff.
F. Firearms Range Committee and Old Courthouse Ad Hoc Committee
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of December 10, 1996:
To: Board of County Commissioners
From: Alice E. White
Executive Aide to Board
Date: December 10, 1996
Subject: Firearms Range and Old Courthouse Committees
Inasmuch as the Firearms Range Committee has not met in several years,
and the old Courthouse has been sold, I respectfully request that the Firearms
Range Committee and Old Courthouse Ad Hoc Committee be formerly
abolished and taken off our committee list.
DECEMBER 17, 1996 10
C
r
ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by
Commissioner Ginn, the Board unanimously abolished
the Firearms Range Committee and the Old Courthouse
Ad Hoc Committee, as recommended by staff.
G. Approval to Amend Elections Budget
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of December 10, 1996:
d's
OF
December 10, 1996
ANN ROBINSON
SUPERVISOR OF ELECTIONS
1840 25TH STREET, SUITE N-109
VERO BEACH, FLORIDA 32960-3394
TELEPHONES: (407) 567-8187 or 567-8000
TO: HON. FRAN ADAMS, CHAIRMAN, BCC
FROM: ANN ROBINSON, SUPERVISOR OF ELECTIONS
RE: ITEM FOR BCC CONSENT AGENDA AT MEETING OF DECEMBER 17
The U.S. Post Office will send a check payable to the Supervisor
of Elections in the amount of $16,046.48 to zero out the postal
accounts for First Class Pre-sort and Business Reply before my
term of office ends on December 31, 1996.
Please vote to amend the elections budget so that Kay Clem,
the new Supervisor of Elections, can accept the $16,046.48
which was deposited in the postal accounts during prior fiscal
years.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by
Commissioner Ginn, the Board unanimously amended the
elections budget by adding the sum of $16,046.48
received from the U.S. Post Office, as recommended
by staff.
DECEMBER 17, 1996 P141
r -
H. GHA, Harbor Pointe's Request for Final PD Plat Approval -
Harbor Pointe at Grand Harbor (Plat 18)
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of December 10, 1996:
TO: James E. Chandler
County Administrator
DJVJJION HEAD CONCURRENCE: DATE:
Robe M. Keatib
13, AICE
Community DeeAvy�el pment ' irector
THROUGH: Stan Boling, AICP
Planning Director
FROM: John W. McCoy, AICP!a a
Senior Planner, Current Development
December 10, 1996
SUBJECT: GHA, Harbor Pointe's Request for Final PD Plat Approval
for Harbor Pointe at Grand Harbor (Plat 18)
It is requested that the data herein presented be given formal
consideration by the Board of County Commissioners at its regular
meeting of December 17, 1996.
DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS:
Harbor Pointe at Grand Harbor (Plat 18) is a plat of an 8.20 acre
parcel located on the east side of the Grand Harbor marina, between
the marina and the Indian River. The plat will create lots for 16
duplex units and 21 single family lots.
On July 13, 1995, the Planning and Zoning Commission granted
preliminary PD plat approval for Harbor Pointe at Grand Harbor.
The developer is now requesting final plat approval for Harbor
Pointe at -Grand Harbor and has submitted the following:
1. A final PD plat in conformance with the approved preliminary
PD plat and approved PD conceptual plan for the harbor area.
2. A certificate of completion for required improvements.
ANALYSIS:
All required improvements for the subdivision have been completed,
and inspected, and a certificate of completion has been issued.
Since all required improvements are complete and will be privately
dedicated, no contract for construction or warranty and maintenance
agreement is necessary as part of the platting process. The
developer has complied with all of the requirements necessary to
obtain final plat approval. It should be noted that utility
facilities which will be dedicated to Indian River County will be
warranted and secured separately, as normally required by the
Utility Services Department. Thus, all requirements for final PD
plat approval for Harbor Pointe at Grand Harbor have been
satisfied.
RECOMMENDATION:
Based on the above referenced analysis, staff recommends that the
Board of County Commissioners grant final PD plat approval for
Harbor Pointe at Grand Harbor (Plat 18).
ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by
Commissioner Ginn, the Board unanimously approved
the final PD plat for Harbor Pointe at Grand Harbor
(Plat 18), as recommended by staff.
DECEMBER 17, 1996
12
I. Indian River County Horizontal Control Network
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of December 11, 1996:
TO: The Board of County Commissioners
FROM: GIJ4—' William G. Collins II - Deputy County Attorney
DATE: December 11,1996
SUBJECT: Indian River County Horizontal Control Network
In 1995 the Board of County Commissioners modified final plat survey
requirements to require ties to at least two Indian River County Horizontal
Control Network (IRCHCN) monuments if any portion of the platted site was
within a mile of one such monument.
However, the Network has never been defined by ordinance and, since it is
dynamic, will tend to change over time.
The purpose of this Resolution is to describe and identify what is meant by
the "Indian River County Horizontal Control Network", and to acknowledge the
dynamic state of the Network over time.
Approve the attached Resolution designating the Indian River County
Horizontal Control Network.
Deputy County Attorney Will Collins explained this- designation
is a request from the Property Appraiser's Office whereby any new
subdivision within 1 mile of a monument be tied to the network.
The purpose of the resolution is to identify the Horizontal
Control Network which is set up under contract with the Florida
Department of Environmental Protection.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by
Commissioner Tippin, the Board unanimously adopted
Resolution 96-152 designating the "Indian River
County Horizontal Control Network".
RESOLUTION NO. 96- 152
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA,
DESIMMTING THE "INDIAN RIVER COUNTY HORIZONTAL
CONTROL NETWORK".
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County,
Florida has adopted an ordinance set out as Indian River County Code Section
913.07(6)(D)(10); and
WHEREAS, said ordinance requires newly ,
4u y platted developments within
one mile of a monument established in the Indian -River County Horizontal
Control Network to be tied into that network; and
1 •
DECEMBER 17, 1996 13:� ���"
RESOLUTION NO. 96- 152
WHEREAS, it is appropriate that the "Indian River County Horizontal
Control Networks be officially designated;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners
of Indian River County, Florida, that the "Indian River County Horizontal
Control Network" consists at this time of 52 monuments meeting Second Order
Class II Standards as published by the National Geodetic Survey and shown on
the attachment to this resolution, and further described in a 1995 survey
conducted by GCY, Inc., placed throughout Indian River County by GCY, Inc.,
under contract to the Florida Department of Environmental Protection and in
cooperation with the County, which monument positions were established using
global positioning satellites and adjustments accomplished using the National
Geodetic Survey software. The monuments within the "network" were tied to
the Florida High Precision Network, the City of Vero Beach GPS network, and
to St. Lucie afid Brevard Counties GPS networks.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that, since the Network is dynamic, tie-ins
to the Indian River County Horizontal Control Network will be deemed for all
intents and purposes to densify the Network.
The foregoing resolution was offered by Commissioner Eggert
and seconded by Commissioner Tlppin and, upon being put to a vote, the
vote was as follows:
Chairman Fran B. Adams Ave
Vice Chairman Carolyn K. Eggert Aye
Commissioner Caroline D. Ginn Aye
Commissioner John W. Tippin Aye
Commissioner Kenneth R. Macht Aye
The Chairman thereupon declared the resolution duly passed and
adopted this _ 17 day of December , 1996.
BOARD OF COUNTY CUmmSSIONERS
IIIDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
BY: \_-7-7n_A-t_ C� �C1Z/vK J
Fran B. Adams, Chairman
ATTEST:
Jeffrey K. Barton, k n
APPROVED AS TO FORM
AND LEGAL SUFFICIENCY
6YL�
WILLIAM G. COLLINS H
DEPUTY COUNTY ATTORNEY
DECEMBER 17, 1996 14
1
1
Indian .diver County, I'loride
G.PA. Control Project
--- BRE VARD-- M.COUNTY 1001 OLe
apse®
._ .,. .
Ow
0 K E E C
H O B E E
lE�
Q -� arra swaaws
w10a1 QIs iMma
®-w°a
aava pwl �1Y00®)
®. Uai OIs laOn - �gvwo
mrn arwa nnr aaa rynm®)
I Dana o►s meaa - n. u�
I earn amen nnr octx lauooa�)
Q- vs ewer ram m�ema
awe rn wowr
I
na aI w woiaoS ro wmrra.
I
I
mrOOO MwOn<�n w.�wa/uw
SP034
00a
00670 f-
COUNTY
0013
®we
U)
rl
v
x
w
w
J
J. Dock License Agreement - Country Club Pointe S/D - Hoda Shukri
Dodge
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of December 9, 1996:
TO: The Board of County Commissioners
FROM: iy` William G. Collins II - Deputy County Attorney
DATE: December 9, 1996
SUBJECT: Dock License Agreement - Country Club Pointe Subdivision
On February 26, 1991 Horst Partenheimer entered into a License Agreement with
Indian River County (recorded at O.R. Book 905 at Page 572 of the Public
Records of Indian River County) for the use of the County's riparian land for
a dock facility. On December 20, 1996 Mr. Partenheimer will be selling his
Country Club Pointe property (Lot 12, Block 1, Replat of Country Club Pointe,
Unit No. 1) to Bode Shukri Dodge. Covenant No. 9 of the Partenheimer License
Agreement provides that upon sale of the Partenheimer property, the License
Agreement terminates, however the purchaser can enter into a similar license
agreement with the County. No. Dodge has expressed a desire to enter into
such a license agreement with Indian River County and at closing on December
20, 1996 will execute a similar License Agreement, attached.
RECOMMENDATION
Approve the attached License Agreement between Indian River County and
Hoda Shukri Dodge, and authorize the Chairman to execute same prior to
recording in the Public Records of Indian River County, Florida.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by
Commissioner Ginn, the Board unanimously approved
the License Agreement with Hoda Shukri Dodge and
authorized the Chairman to execute same prior to
recording in the Public Records, as recommended by
staff.
AGREEMENT IS ON FILE IN THE OFFICE
OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
K. Cancellation of Outstanding Taxes - Property Purchased for County
Use
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of December 9, 1996:
TO: Board of County Commissioners
FROM: Lea R. Keller, CLA, County Attorney's Office
THRU: Charles P.`t(3`tunac, County Attorney
DATE: December 9, 1996
BE: CANCELLATION OF OUTSTANDING TAXES
PROPERTY PURCHASED FOR COUNTY USE
The County recently acquired some property and, pursuant to Section
196.28, Florida Statutes, the Board of County Commissioners is allowed
to cancel and discharge any taxes owed on the portion of the property
acquired for public purposes. Such cancellation must be done by
resolution of the Board with a certified copy being forwarded to the Tax
Collector and,copies sent to the Property Appraiser.
DECEMBER 17, 1996 16
Pq
REQUESTED ACTION: Board authorize the Chairman to sign the
attached resolutions cancelling taxes upon lands the County recently
acquired.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by
Commissioner Ginn, the Board unanimously adopted
Resolution 96-153 (Burger - 4th Street R/W)
cancelling certain delinquent taxes upon publicly
owned lands, pursuant to Section 196.28, Florida
Statutes.
Re: Fourth Street R/W
Parcel #14-33-39-00006-0070-00001.0
Michael and Bolen Burger, Jr.
RESOLUTION NO. 96--153
A RESOLUTION OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA,
CANCELLING CERTAIN DELINQUENT TABES UPON PUBLICLY
OWNED LANDS, PURSUANT TO SECTION 196.28, FLORIDA
STATUTES.
WHEREAS, Section 196.28, Florida Statutes, allows the Board of County
Commissioners of each County to cancel and discharge any and all liens for
taxes, delinquent or current, held or owned by the county or the state,
upon lands. heretofore or hereafter conveyed to or acquired by any agency,
governmental subdivision, or municipality of the state, or the United States,
for road purposes, defense purposes, recreation, reforestation,- *or other
public use; and
WHEREAS, such cancellation must be by resolution of the Board of
County Commissioners, duly adopted and entered upon its minutes properly
describing such lands and setting forth the public use to which the same are
or will be devoted; and
WHEREAS, upon receipt of a certified copy of such resolution, proper
officials of the county and of the state are authorized, empowered, and
directed to make proper entries upon the records to accomplish such
cancellation and to do all things necessary to carry out the provisions of
Section 196.28, F.S.;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY
SSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that.
1. Any and all liens for taxes, delinquent or current, against the property
described in O. R. Book 1130, Page 346, which was recently acquired by
Indian River County for right of way on S.W. 4th Street are hereby
cancelled, pursuant to the authority of Section 196.28, F.S.
2. The Clerk to the Board of County Commissioners is hereby directed to
send a certified copy of this resolution to the Tax Collector and the
Property Appraiser.
The resolution was moved for adoption by Commissioner Eggert ,
and the motion was seconded by Commissioner Gln n , and, upon being
put to a vote, the vote was as follows:
Chairman Fran B. Adams Aye
Vice Chairman Carolyn K. Eggert Aye
Commissioner Caroline D. Ginn Aye
Commissioner John W. Tippin Aye
Commissioner Kenneth R. Macht Aye
The Chairman thereupon declared the resolution duly passed and adopted
this /`% day of 1996.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
tee By zq0"' ,8
Fran B. Adams, Chairman
J. K. n, Clerk
DECEMBER 17, 1996
L'
17
F A ff
" n t PAUL ®-
1 w
1
M
X
W
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
I
Begin at the SW corner of Lot 2, Block 7 of
Royal Poinciono Park Unit No. 1 as shown on
W
the plat recorded in Plat Book 4, Page 43 of
the Public Records of Indian River County, and run
Z
Northerly, along the West line of Lot 2, a
distance of 25 feet to a point. Then run
Southeasterly, through Lot 2, a distance of
Q
35.4 feet, more or less, to a point lying in the
South line of the said Lot 2, a distance of 25
feet East from the beginning point. Then run
I 35'
Westerly, along the South line of Lot 2, a
O �-----
distance of 25 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING.
less.
N
P.O.B.
Containing 312.5 square feet, more or
Lying in Indian River County, Florida.
SW Cor. of SW 1/4 of
the NE 1/4 14-33-39
CERTIFICATION
LOT
j 104.3'
BLOCK 7
Scale: 1"=30'
LOT 2
�s LOT 3
104.39' (Plot)
OI
LO 4TH STREET
c�
3
0
in
in
I, Charles A. Cromer, hereby certify that I am a registered Professional Surveyor and Mapper licensed to practice in the state >
of Florida, that this sketch was made under' my immediate supervision, and that it is accurate and correct. I further certify c
that this sketch meets the Minimum Technical standards as described in Chapter 61G17 of the Florida Administrative Code, a
pursuant to F.S. Chapter 472. THIS IS NOT A SURVEY J
SKETCH TO ACCOMPANY LEGAL DESCRIPTION
PREPARED FOR INDIAN RIVER COUNTY ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT c
Charles A. Cromer, P.S.M. Reg. #4094
Indian River County Surveyor
1840 25th St, Vero Beach, FL 32960
(407) 567-8000
Date 1gp eja& «9 I
F
J
ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by
Commissioner Ginn, the Board unanimously adopted
Resolution 96-154 (Laurel Builders, Inc. - Oslo Road
R/W) cancelling certain delinquent taxes upon
publicly owned lands, pursuant to Section 196.28,
Florida Statutes.
Re: Oslo Road R/W - Parcel #101-D
Parcel #20-33-39-00001-0150-00001.0
Laurel Bldrs. Inc.
RESOLUTION NO. 96--;_1 54
A RESOLUTION OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA,
CANCELLING CERTAIN DELINQUENT TABES UPON PUBLICLY
OWNED LANDS, PURSUANT TO SECTION 196.28, FLORIDA
STATUTES.
WHEREAS, Section 196.28, Florida Statutes, allows the Board of County
Commissioners of each County to cancel and discharge any and all liens for
taxes, delinquent or current, held or owned by the county or the state,
upon lands heretofore or hereafter conveyed to or acquired by any agency,
governmental subdivision, or municipality of the state, or the United States,
for road purposes, defense purposes, recreation, reforestation, or other
public use; and
WHEREAS, such cancellation must be by resolution of the Board of
County Commissioners, duly adopted and entered upon its minutes properly
describing such lands and setting forth the public use to which the same are
or will be devoted; and
WHEREAS, upon receipt of a certified copy of such resolution, proper
officials of the county and of the state are authorized, empowered, and
directed to make proper entries upon the records to accomplish such
cancellation and to do all things necessary to carry out the provisions of
Section 196.28, F.S.;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY
SSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that:
1. Any and all liens for taxes, delinquent or current, against the property
described in 0. R. Book 1130, Page 354, which was recently acquired by
Indian River County for right of way on Oslo Road are hereby cancelled,
pursuant to the authority of Section 196.28, F.S.
2. The Clerk to the Board of County Commissioners is hereby directed to
send a certified copy of this resolution to the Tax Collector and the
Property Appraiser.
The resolution was moved for adoption by Commissioner Fggert ,
and the motion was seconded by Commissioner Ginn , and, upon being
put to a vote, the vote was as follows:
Chairman Fran B. Adams Aye
Vice Chairman Carolyn K. Eggert Aye
Commissioner Caroline D. Ginn Aye
Commissioner John W. Tippin Aye
Commissioner Kenneth R. Macht Aye
The Chairman thereupon declared the resolution duly passed and adopted
this 1'7 day ofl`aLe���c�d/ , 1996.
et: _
J.Z.7Gvtpn, Clerk
C� ;ASL=
DECEMBER 17, 1996
19
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
INDDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
By�7C-i►'LC/'S�c/�
Fran B. Adams, Chairman
N
1 O
1
Parcel 101 C
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
- Parcel 101C
OSLO ROAD
Section Line
to
U
OI
a�
C
J
LJ
The . North
70
feet
of the South
120 feet of Tract 16,
Section 20, Township 33 South,
Range 39 East,
according to
the
last
general plat of the Indian River Forms
Company, recorded in Plat Book
2, Page 25
of the Public
Records
of St. Lucie
County, Florida, LESS
the
East 1130.5 feet. AND
The North
70
feet
of the South
120 feet of the East
957.30 feet of Tract 15, Section
20, Township 33
South, Range
39
East
according to
the last general plot
of
the lands of the Indian River
Farms Company,
recorded in Plat
Book
2, Page 25
of the Public Records
of
St. Lucie County, Florida.
Together containing
75,217.33 square
feet, or 1.73 acres,
lying in Indian River County,
Florida.
CEMCA71ON
SCALE: 1"=250'
0
V \J
,C
�J
C '
Z v
20 21
29 2
Section Comer
I, Charles A. Cramer, hereby certify that I am a registered Professional Surveyor and Mapper licensed to practice in the state
of Florida, that this sketch was made under my immediate supervision, and that it, is accurate and correct. I further certify
that this sketch meets the Minimum Technical standards as described in Chapter'.611317 of the Florida Administrative Code,
pursuant to F.S. Chapter 472.
Charles A. Cramer, P.S.M. Reg. #4094
Indian River County Surveyor
1840 25th St, Vero Beach, FL 32960
:4C7} 5c' -3000
PREPARED FOR INDIAN RNER COUNW
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
THIS IS NOT A SURVEY
SKETCH TO ACCOMPANY LEGAL DESCRIPTION
Date /e, IVO ✓ /992
t
ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by
Commissioner Ginn, the Board unanimously adopted
Resolution 96-155 (Berlin - SWDD Landfill Expansion)
cancelling certain delinquent taxes upon publicly
owned lands, pursuant to Section 196.28, Florida
Statutes.
Re: SWDD Landfill Expansion
Parcel #25-33-38-00001-0020-00003.0
Mary K. Berlin
RESOLUTION NO. 96- 155
A RESOLUTION OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA,
CANCELLING CERTAIN DELINQUENT TAXES UPON PUBLICLY
OWNED LANDS, PURSUANT TO SECTION 196.28, FLORIDA
STATUTES.
WHEREAS, Section 196.28, Florida Statutes, allows the Board of County
Commissioners of each County to cancel and discharge any and all liens for
taxes, delinquent or current, held or owned by the county or the state,
upon lands heretofore or hereafter conveyed to or acquired by any agency,
governmental subdivision, or municipality of the state, or the United States,
for road purposes, defense purposes, recreation, reforestation, or other
public use; and
WHEREAS, such cancellation must be by resolution of the Board of
County Commissioners, duly adopted and entered upon its minutes properly
describing such lands and setting forth the public use to which the same are
or will be devoted; and
WHEREAS, upon receipt of a certified copy of such resolution, proper
officials of the county and of the state are authorized, empowered, and
directed to make proper entries upon the records to accomplish such
cancellation and to do all things necessary to carry out the provisions of
Section 196.28, F.S.;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY
SSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that:
1. Any and all liens for taxes, delinquent or current, against the property
described in 0. R. Book 1128, Page 809, which was recently acquired by
Indian River County for landfill expansion are hereby cancelled,
pursuant to the authority of Section 196.28, F.S.
2. The Clerk to the Board of County Commissioners is hereby directed to
send a certified copy of this resolution to the Tax Collector and the
Property Appraiser.
The resolution was moved for adoption by Commissioner Fggart ,
and the motion was seconded by Commissioner Ginn , and, upon being
put to a vote, the vote was as follows
Chairman Fran B. Adams Aye
Vice Chairman Carolyn R. Eggert Aye
Commissioner Caroline D. Ginn Aye
Commissioner John W. Tippin Aye
Commissioner Kenneth R. Macht Aye
The Chairman thereupon declared the resolution duly passed and adopted
this 17 day of 1996.
Attest::
4-
J. on, Clerk
DECEMBER 17, 1996
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
By�-� � - A aeo-�� -
Fran B. Adams, Chairman
21 ek 00 ,pui
J
I
This Instrument was prepared Incident to
the issuance of a title insurance contract,
and is to be returned to.
Leonard L. Spangler, Jr.
Atlantic Coastal Title Corporation
3850 20th Street, Suite 6
Vero Beach, Florida 32960
IL:IREPORTW023804.WD11
ACTC File Number. 96023804
Parcel ID Number: 25-33-38-00001-0020-00003.0
GENERAL WARRANTY DEED
This deed, made this 8th day of November, 199b Mary K. Berlin Grantor); and
Indian River County Solid Waste Disposal District, a epen ent special district o
Indian River County, Florida, whose postoffice address is: 1840 25th Street, Ver
Beach, Florida 32960 (as Grantee);
(Wherever used herein, the forms grantor" and grantee` shall include singular and plwal, heirs, legal
ropresentatlms, and assigns o1 individuals, and the successors and asstgns o1 corporations, partnerships or other
entities; wherever the context so admits or requires.)
WITNESSETH:
That the grantor, for and in consideration of the sum of $10.00 in hand paid by grantee, the receipt whereof
is hereby acknowledged, does hereby grant, bargain, sell, alien, remise, release, convey and confiim unto the
grantee forever, all the right, title, interest, claim and demand which the said grantor has in and to the following
described parcel of land, to wit:
The East 1/2 of the West 112 of Tracts 2 and 7, INDIAN RIVER FARMS
COMPANY'S SUBDIVISION of Section 25, Township 33 South, Range 38
East, according to the Plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book 2, at Page
25, of the Public Records of St. Lucie County, Florida; said lands now
lying and being in Indian River County, Florida.
TOGETHER with all the tenements, hereditaments and appurtenances thereto belonging or In anywise
appertaining.
TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the same in fee simple forever.
AND grantor hereby covenants with grantee that grantor is lawfully seized of said land in fee simple; that
grantor has good right and lawful authority to sell and convey said land; that grantor hereby fully warrants the
title to said land and will defend the same against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever; and that said
land is free of all encumbrances, except taxes for the year in which this deed is given; and restrictions,
ATLANTIC COASTAL TITLE CORPORATION
A Full Service, Florida Title Insurance Agency
DECEMBER 17, 1996 22
_I
ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by
Commissioner Ginn, the Board unanimously adopted
Resolution 96-156 (Houdyshell, Inc. - 5th Street SW
R/W) cancelling certain delinquent taxes upon
publicly owned lands, pursuant to Section 196.28,
Florida Statutes.
Re: Fifth Street, SW - R/W
Parcel #23-33-39-00001-0050-00009.0
Houdyshell, Inc.
RESOLUTION NO. 96 - _LU_
5 b
A RESOLUTION OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA,
CANCELLING CERTAIN DELINQUENT TABES UPON PUBLICLY
OWNED LANDS, PURSUANT TO SECTION 196.28, FLORIDA
STATUTES.
WHEREAS, Section 196.28, Florida Statutes, allows the Board of County
Commissioners of each County to cancel and discharge any and all liens for
taxes, delinquent or current, held or owned by the county or the state,
upon lands heretofore or hereafter conveyed to or acquired by any agency,
governmental subdivision, or municipality of the state, or the United States,
for road purposes, defense purposes, recreation, reforestation, or other
public use; and -
WHEREAS, such cancellation must be by resolution of the Board of
County Commissioners, duly adopted and entered upon its minutes properly
describing such lands and setting forth the public use to which the same are
or will be devoted; and
WHEREAS, upon receipt of a certified copy of such resolution, proper
officials of the county and of the state are authorized, empowered, and
directed to make proper entries upon the records to accomplish such
cancellation and to do all things necessary to carry out the provisions of
Section 196.28, F.S.;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that:
1. Any and all liens for taxes, delinquent or current, against the property
described in O. R. Book //3/ , Page /Oo6 , which was recently
acquired by Indian River County for right of way on S.W. 5th Street are
hereby cancelled, pursuant to the authority of Section 196.28, F.S.
2. The Clerk to the Board of County Commissioners is hereby directed to
send a certified copy of this resolution to the Tax Collector and the
Property Appraiser.
The resolution was moved for adoption by Commissioner Eggert ,
and the motion was seconded by Commissioner Ginn_, and, upon being
put to a vote, the vote was as follows:
Chairman Fran B. Adams Aye
Vice Chairman Carolyn K. Eggert Aye
Commissioner Caroline D. Ginn Aye
Commissioner John W. Tippin Aye
Commissioner Kenneth R. Macht Aye
The Chairman thereupon declared the resolution duly passed and adopted
this L day of ,(�,����- , 1996.
J. K.rBar�on, Cler
�.��`att, . z
DECEMBER 17, 1996
23
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY,, FLORIDA
TY
By 1"tZ� 6 ( .ld/6�
Fran B. Adams, Chairman
4oe
M
Z
0
1
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
The North 10 feet of the South 90 feet of the
West 20 acres LESS the West 50 feet, of Tract 5,
Section 23, Township 33 South, Range 39 East,
according to the last general plat of the lands of
the Indian River Forms Company recorded in Plot
Book 2, Page 25 of the Public Records of St. Lucie
County, Florida.
Now 'lying in Indian River County, Florida.
Containing 6,054.4 square feet, or 0.14 acres.
rronmrAmm
r
04
�f
50'
;0
01
a]
9
605.44'
605.44'
57H STREET S.W. (REBEL ROAD)
S.W. Cor.
Tract 5
U)
a
0
N
M
N
O
N
C
J
y
0
w
Scale: 1"= 150'
c�
3
0
3
I, Charles A. Cromer, hereby certify that I am a registered Professional Surveyor and Mapper licensed to practice in the state
of Florida, that this sketch was made under my immediate supervision, and that it is accurate and correct. 1 further certify
that this sketch meets the Minimum Technical standards as described in Chapter 61G17 of the Florida Administrative Code, a
pursuant to F.S. Chapter 472. W
THIS IS NOT A SURVEY 2
L,
SKETCH TO ACCOMPANY LEGAL DESCRIPTION
6
PREPARED FOR INDIAN RIVER COUNTY ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT o
Charles A. Cromer, P.S.M. Reg. #4094 1840 25th St, Vero Beach, FL 32960 0
Indian River County Surveyor (407) 567-8000 Dote a
ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by
Commissioner Ginn, the Board unanimously adopted
Resolution 96-157 (Grimm - Property Exchange)
cancelling certain delinquent taxes upon publicly
owned lands, pursuant to Section 196.28, Florida
Statutes.
Res Property Exchange
Parcel #12-33-39-00000-3000-00011.0
Floyd and Helen Grimm
RESOLUTION NO. 96- 157
A RESOLUTION OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA,
CANCELLING CERTAIN DELINQUENT TAXES UPON PUBLICLY
OWNED LANDS, PURSUANT TO SECTION 196.28, FLORIDA
STATUTES.
WHEREAS, Section 196.28, Florida Statutes, allows the Board of County
Commissioners of each County to cancel and discharge any and all liens for
taxes, delinquent or current, held or owned by the county or the state,
upon lands heretofore or hereafter conveyed to or acquired by any agency,
governmental subdivision, or municipality of the state, or the United States,
for road purposes, defense purposes, recreation, reforestation, or other
public use; and
WHEREAS, such cancellation must be by resolution of the Board of
County Commissioners, duly adopted and entered upon its minutes properly
describing such lands and setting forth the public use to which the same are
or will be devoted; and
WHEREAS, upon receipt of a certified copy of such resolution, proper
officials of the county and of the state are authorized, empowered, and
directed to make proper entries upon the records to accomplish such
cancellation and to do all things necessary to carry out the provisions of
Section 196.28, F.S.;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that:
1. Any and all liens for taxes, delinquent or current, against the property
described in O. R. Book /131 , Page 1007 , which was recently
acquired by Indian River County in change for property owned by the
Grimms are hereby cancelled, pursuant to the authority of Section
196.28, F.S.
2. The Clerk to the Board of County Commissioners is hereby directed to
send a certified copy of this resolution to the Tax Collector and the
Property Appraiser.
The resolution was moved for adoption by Commissioner mur t ,
and the motion was seconded by Commissioner Ginn and, upon being
put to a vote, the vote was as follower
Chairman Fran B. Adams Aye
Vice Chairman Carolyn K. Eggert Aye
Commissioner Caroline D. Ginn Aye
Commissioner John W. Tippin Aye
Commissioner Kenneth R. Macht Aye
The Chairman thereupon declared the resolution duly passed and adopted
this 1Z day of ,((1p���_.�te�/ , 1996.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
A ^ �
By i�,vl �e
Fran B. Adams, Chairman
J. K. B n, Clerk
DECEMBER 17, 1996
25
G.?
ncn • ��
2 .5'
83
.7'v
oI
EI
«I
WI
�1
•
� I
�I
�L_
I
191.5'
168'
rl
O
27.5'
)N
41
Scale: 1 "= 60'
832.7' —�
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
The South 100 feet of the North 184.41 feet of the West 23.5 feet of the East 832.7 feet of the SE 1/4 of the NW 1/4 of
Section 12. Township 33 South, Range 39 East.
Lying in Indian River County, Florida. 3
Containing 2,350 square feet, more or less. c
U
CERTIFICATION W
0
I, Charles A. Cramer, hereby certify that I am a registered Professional Surveyor and Mapper licensed to practice in the state o
of Florida, that this sketch was made under my immediate supervision: and that it is accurate and correct. I further certify W
that this sketch meets the Minimum Technical standards as described in Chapter 61 G 17 of the Florida Administrative Code, -i
pursuant to F.S. Chapter 472. W
PREPARED FOR INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT o3
THIS IS NOT A SURVEY o
Charles A. Cramer, P.S.M. Reg. /4094 1840 25th St, Vero Beach, FL 32960 SKETCH TO ACCOMPANY LEGAL DESCRIPTION a
Indian River County Surveyor (407) 567-8000 �,� /99L
Date �
1
N I;
W
ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by
Commissioner Ginn, the Board unanimously adopted
Resolution 96-158 (Hercules, Inc. - SWDD Landfill
Expansion) cancelling certain delinquent taxes upon
publicly owned lands, pursuant to Section 196.28,
Florida Statutes.
Ret SWDD Landfill Expansion
Parcels 925-33-38-00001-0020-00001.0
and 925-33-38-00001-0070-00003.0
Hercules Inc.
RESOLUTION N0. 96= 158
A RESOLUTION OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA,
CANCELLING CERTAIN DELINQUENT TARES UPON PUBLICLY
OWNED LANDS, PURSUANT TO SECTION 196.28, FLORIDA
STATUTES.
WHEREAS, Section 196.28, Florida Statutes, allows the Board of County
Commissioners of each County to cancel and discharge any and all liens for
taxes, delinquent or current, held or owned by the county or the state,
upon lands heretofore or hereafter conveyed to or acquired by any agency,
governmental subdivision, or municipality of the state, or the United States,
for road purposes, defense purposes, recreation, reforestation, or other
public use; and _
WHEREAS, such cancellation must be by resolution of the Board of
County Commissioners, duly adopted and entered upon its minutes properly
describing such lands and setting forth the public use to which the same are
or will be devoted; and
WHEREAS, upon receipt of a certified copy of such resolution, proper
officials of the county and of the state are authorized, empowered, and
directed to make proper entries upon the records to accomplish such
cancellation and to do all things necessary to carry out the provisions of
Section 196.28, F.S.;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that:
1. Any and all liens for taxes, delinquent or current, against the property
described in O. R. Book //3/ , Page (Pi7 , which was recently acquired
by Indian River County for landfill expansion are hereby cancelled,
pursuant to the authority of Section 196.28, F.S.
2. The Clerk to the Board of County Commissioners is hereby directed to
send a certified copy of this resolution to the Tax Collector and the
Property Appraiser.
The resolution was moved for adoption by Commissioner Eggert ,
and the motion was seconded by Commissioner Ginn , and, upon being
put to a vote, the vote was as follower
Chairman Fran B. Adams Aye
Vice Chairman Carolyn K. Eggert Aye
Commissioner Caroline D. Ginn Aye
Commissioner John W. Tippin Aye
Commissioner Kenneth R. Macht Aye
The Chairman thereupon declared the resolution duly passed and adopted
this _jj_ day of 1996.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
Ott (GL►� tQ (/c/)
By --
Fran S. Adams, Chairman
J. , Clerk
DECEMBER 17, 199627 . , 4,.0�� Pace y
IL:IACTCIREPORT196023934.CLSI
BUYER'S CLOSING STATEMENT
Prepared by
ATLANTIC COASTAL TITLE CORPORATION
3850 20th Street, Suite 6, Vero Beach, Florida 32960
ACTC File Number: 96023934
Closing Date: December 6th, 1996
Buyer's Name: Indian River County Solid Waste Disposal District, a dependent special
district of Indian River County, Florida
Seller's Name: Hercules, In rporated, a Delaware corporation
Legal Description: The East 112 of Tracts 2 and 7, INDIAN RIVER FARMS COMPANY'S
SUBDIVISION of Section 25, Township 33 South, Range 38 East, according
to the Plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book 2, at Page 25, of the Public
Records of SL Lucie County, Florida; said lands now situate, lying and being
In Indian River County, Florida.
BUY E.'.$, LO.SIN000STS3f�a¢;>;r �s''
CREDITS DEBITS
PURCHASE PRICE
DEPOSIT $
$ 1,104,433.30
10,000.00
PURCHASE MONEY MORTGAGE TO SELLER (if any)
PRINCIPAL BALANCE OF MORTGAGE BEING ASSUMED
RECORDING FEES (to Clerk of the Circuit Court) _
_ Documentary Stamps on Purchase Money Mortgage (@.35 per $100)
Intangible Tax on Purchase Money Mortgage (@ .002 x Note Amount)
Miscellaneous Recording Fees
TITLE INSURANCE PREMIUMS (to Atlantic Coastal Title Corporation)
Closing Fee (to Atlantic Coastal Title Corporation)
Title Search Fees (to Atlantic Coastal Title Corporation)
Title Examination Fees (to Atlantic Coastal Title Corporation)
Public Record Copies (to Atlantic Coastal Title Corporation)
REAL PROPERTY TAXES (January 1 st through Day Before Closing Date) $
REAL PROPERTY TAXES (Closing Date through December 31st)
Express Delivery Fees (to Atlantic Coastal Title Corporation)
$ _ 10.50
$ 0.00
$ _ 0_.00
$ 150.00
$ 45.00
$_ 45.00
0.00
$_ 7_05.28y
_ TOTAL BUYER CREDITSIDEBITS $
10,000.00 $ 1,105,389.08
TOTAL AMOUNT DUE FROM BUYER
$ 1,095,389.08
1 hereby certify that the debits and credits reflected heron accurately represent all receipts and disbursements made on my behalf In this transaction Real
property taxes were prorated based on the gross amount of taxes due for the preceding year, with the credit/debit arrived at by dividing that amount by 365
and multiplying the result by the number of elapsed days In the current year, Including the day of closing. Any variations in actual costs from those reflected
hereon that result in overcharges or undercharges not In excess of $25.00 to any party shall be credited to or debited against closing fees charged by Atlantic
Coastal Title Corporation.
Indian River County Solid Waste Disposal District, a dependent special district of Indian River
County, Florida
i `
DECEMBER 17, 1996 28
L. Grant of Easement - 10 Foot Strip of Land Between
Indian River Mall and Indian River Square Developments
- Lowe's Home Center, Inc. - Indian River Mall Associates
- Indian River Square Limited Partnership - Dayton Hudson
Corporation
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of December 9, 1996:
TO: The Board of County Commissioners
FROM: ;� William G. Collins II - Deputy County Attorney
DATE: December 9, 1996
SUBJECT: Grant of Easement of 10 -Foot Strip of Land Lying Between the
Indian River Mall and the Indian River Square Developments
On August 20, 1966 the Board of County Commissioners accepted a Quit -Claim
Deed from the Indian River Farms Water Control District for a 10 -foot strip
of land lying between the Indian River Mall and the Indian River Square
developments.
At that time the County Commission authorized the Chairman to execute an
easement running in favor of the owners of the Indian River Mall and Indian
River Square projects which would allow the 10 -foot strip to be utilized by
the grantee for the purpose of common ingress, egress, access,
cross -connection of internal driveways, landscaping, sodding and irrigation
of any medians within such common access driveways, pedestrian
inter -connections, electrical conduit under the strip, utilities, drainage,
etc.
The 10 -foot strip over which the easement is to be granted lies between the
two projects at the point where FDOT has required the developers to have a
joint ingress/egress access point on S.R. 60 at their common property lines.
RECOMMENDATION•
Authorize the Chairman to execute the attached Easement, as approved in
concept on August 20, 1996.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by
Commissioner Ginn, the Board unanimously approved
the Grant of Easement to Lowe's Home Center, Inc.,
IR Mall Associates,, Ltd., Indian River Square
Limited Partnership, and Dayton Hudson Corporation,
and authorized the Chairman to execute same, as
recommended by staff.
EASEMENT IS ON FILE IN THE OFFICE
OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
DECEMBER 17, 1996 29� �`L E4
M. "Amendment H to Option Agreement" - 34 Atlantic Gulf
Communities (AGC) Sebastian Highlands Scrub Lots
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of December 10, 1996:
TO: James E. Chandler
County.Administrator
D R ENT HEAD CONCURRENCE:
ert M. Kea ing, IC
Community Developmm tt Di ctor
FROM: Roland M. DeBlois,'�ICP
Chief, Environmental Planning
DATE: December 10, 1996
SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF "AMENDMENT II TO OPTION AGREEMENT FOR SALE
AND PURCHASE" OF 34 ATLANTIC GULF COMMUNITIES (AGC)
SEBASTIAN HIGHLANDS SCRUB LOTS
It is requested that the information herein presented be given
formal consideration by the Board of County Commissioners at its
regular meeting of December 17, 1996.
DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS
On November 19, 1996, the Board of County Commissioners approved
the County purchase of 34 clustered Atlantic Gulf Communities (AGC)
scrub lots in Sebastian Highlands (at the appraised value of
$86,000), and authorized the Board Chairman to coordinate with
county staff and execute documents necessary for closing and
Florida Communities Trust (FCT) cost -share funding.
Attached is- "Amendment II to the Option Agreement for Sale and
Purchase," which amends the previously approved Option Agreement to
reduce the total number of lots to 34 clustered lots. Since this
document requires the Board Chairman's signature, it is herein
presented for the Board's consideration.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners authorize
the Board Chairman to execute the attached "Amendment II to the
Option Agreement for Sale and Purchase" of the 34 AGC scrub lots in
Sebastian Highlands Unit 17.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by
Commissioner Ginn, the Board unanimously approved
Amendment II to Option Agreement with Atlantic Gulf
Communities Corporation, and authorized the Chairman
to execute same, as recommended by staff.
AGREEMENT IS ON FILE IN THE OFFICE
DECEMBER 17, 1996
II
OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
30
s
L_1
N. Amendment to Option Agreement - Fischer -St. Sebastian
River LAAC Site
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of December 10, 1996:
TO: James E. Chandler
County Administrator
DE R ENT HEAD CONCURRENCE:
Robert M. Ke ng, AICP
Community Developm6nnt Di ector
FROM: Roland M. DeBlois-AICP
Chief, Environmental Planning
DATE: December 10, 1996
SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF AMENDMENT TO OPTION AGREEMENT FOR SALE AND
PURCHASE OF THE FISCHER-ST. SEBASTIAN RIVER LAAC SITE
It is requested that the information herein presented be given
formal consideration by the Board of County Commissioners at its
meeting of December 17, 1996.
DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS
On December 3, 1996, the Board of County Commissioners authorized
staff to close on the Fischer -St. Sebastian River property in order
to meet a January 1, 1997 deadline for option exercise. A condition
of closing is that the seller must escrow $89,400 to account for a
potential property value adjustment due to increased wetland
acreage. At the December 3rd meeting, the Board authorized staff to
continue working with State CARL program staff to obtain after -the -
fact 50% cost -share funding reimbursement. Moreover, the Board
authorized the Board Chairman to execute closing documents and
cost -share documents relating to the purchase.
Attached is a copy of an "Amendment to the Option Agreement for
Sale and Purchase" of the Fischer property that requires the Board
Chairman's signature. This amendment is necessary to set forth
parameters for the seller's $89,400 escrow.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners authorize
the Board Chairman to execute the attached "Amendment to Option
Agreement for Sale and Purchase" relating to the Fischer property
purchase.
Community Development Director Bob Keating advised this
amendment involves 1 minor change. On page 58, the time of escrow
is listed as July, 1998. Staff has agreed with Dr. Fischer to
change the date to January 1, 1997 which will be 1 year. Dr.
Fischer would then be allowed to assign to the contract to a third
party.
DECEMBER 17, 1996
31
r
ON MOTION by Commissioner Macht, SECONDED by
Commissioner Ginn, the Board unanimously approved
the Amendment to Option Agreement with Henry A.
Fischer and authorized the Chairman to execute same,
as recommended by staff.
AGREEMENT IS ON FILE IN THE OFFICE
OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
Later in the meeting, Assistant County Attorney Terry O'Brien
asked the Board to reconsider this item as to the additional matter
of granting Dr. Fischer an access easement over property being
donated by him to the County.
Attorney Warren Dill, representing Dr. Fischer, explained that
on the west side of Sebastian River Dr. Fischer is deeding a 1.5
acre parcel of undeveloped property to the County and is requesting
a 60 foot access easement to the balance of his property. The
requested easement is actually an extension of CR -510.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Macht, SECONDED by
Commissioner Eggert, the Board unanimously
authorized staff to prepare the deed and authorized
the Chairman to execute same.
EASEMENT IS ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE
CLERK TO THE BOARD
O. Annual Contributions Voucher - Housing Authority
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of December 11, 1996:
DATE: 12/11/96
TO: HONORABLE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
THRU: JAMES E. CHANDLER
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
FROM: H.T. "SONNY" DEAN, DIRECTO ED FRY, DIREMR
DEPARTMENT OF GENERAL SE ES FINANCE DEPARMOU
SUBJECT: Report on Voucher for payment of Annual Contributions
Housing Assistance Payments Program a
BACKGROUND:
The attached HUD Foams 52681 and HUD Foam 52595, covering the 1995/96 Fiscal
Year, were prepared by the Finance Department and the Rental Assistance Department
staff.
We respectfully request that the Honorable members of the Board of County
Canni.ssioners authorize tale Chaizran's signature for the submission of these
form to the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.
DECEMBER 17, 1996 32
J
L�
ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by
Commissioner Ginn, the Board unanimously approved
the submission of the Report on Voucher for Payment
of Annual Contributions and Operating Statement to
the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development
and authorized the Chairman to execute same, as
recommended by staff.
REPORT IS ON FILE IN THE OFFICE
OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
P. Juvenile .Justice Council - John Tiepin
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of December 16, 1996:
To: Board of County Commissioners
From: Fran B. Adams, Chairman
Date: December 16, 1996
Subject: Appointment to Juvenile Justice Council -
I would recommend that John Tippin be appointed as our representative on
the Juvenile Justice Council.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by
Commissioner Ginn, the Board unanimously appointed
John Tippin to the Juvenile Justice Council.
Q. Public Official Bond - Richard R. Aldrich, Trustee. Indian River
County Hospital District
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of December 16, 1996:
CLEM, POLACKWICH, VOCELLE & TAYLOR
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
A PAwmasHIF INcLuDING
PROFERRIONAL Assocwtow
SU11E 501
BREVARD COUNTT OFFICE
IINIVERT BUILDING
304 EAST STRAwaRIDGE AVENL'C
Cutma CLEW. P.A.
2770 INDIAN RIVER BOULEVARD
MELBOultm FLaRIDA 32901
ALAN S. POLActwIC% SR. P.A.
VERO BEACH, FLORIDA 32960.4278
TELEPHONE (4071725-3303
IA015 B. VOCELLE. Ja.: P. A.
JAWEs A. TATLOa. III
TELEPHONE 1561) 562.8111
PLEA= REAcxm
FAX 15611 562.2870
PAUL R. BERG
hrtP://www.veracom/web/law.htm
ROBERT GOLDEN
Or COUNSEL
' 80Atm Ccmrm Ctm 7k" LAwns
BoA.o Ctwom guano LmaAme LAwyn
NEMORANDUM
*Curtrmo Croy mcota n
TO: Alice E.
White, Executive Aide
Board of
County Commissioners
FROM: Linda A.
Cichewic Legal Asst.
DATE: December
16, 1996
RE: Richard
R. Aldrich, Trustee, Indian River
County Hospital
District
Approval
of Public Official Bond to be Placed on December 17,
1996 County Commissioners' Agenda
Our File
No. 2025.0653
DECEMBER 17, 1996
A01 PA `.`.
33
Attached is the original, fully executed bond for Richard R. Aldrich,
Trustee -elect to the Indian River County Hospital District. Also,
attached for your file (should you need it) is a copy of Mr. Aldrich's
Oath and Acceptance.
Please place this bond as an emergency matter for approval on the Com-
mission's December 17, 1996 agenda. Once the bond is approved by the
clerk, signed by a member of the Commission, and filed, please prepare
your standard letter to the Division of Elections indicating that this
was done. Please fax a copy of the approved bond and transmittal
letter. Thereafter, I will send the original Oath and Acceptance and
a check for the issuance of the commission to Tallahassee.
As always, it is a pleasure working with you; your cooperation and
assistance is greatly appreciated.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by
Commissioner Ginn, the Board unanimously approved
Richard R. Aldrich's Public Official Bond.
REQUEST BY SHERIFF WHEELER FOR HELICOPTER PILOT AND
CIVILIAN MECHANIC
The Board reviewed a letter of December 11, 1996:
�Fjeriff
GARY C. WHEELER • INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
MEMBER FLORIDA SHERIFFS' ASSOCIATION
MEMBER OF NATIONAL SHERIFFS ASSOCIATION
4055 41 St AVENUE VERO BEACH. -FLORIDA 32960-1808
December 11, 1996
The Honorable Fran B. Adams, Chairman
Board of County Commissioners
Indian River County
1840 25th Street
Vero Beach, FL 32960
Dear Chairman Adams:
PHONE (561) 569-670C
Attached please find back-up information on my request for your approval of two additional
positions to the Sheriffs Office. One position will be a sworn helicopter pilot and the other
position is for a civilian helicopter mechanic.
Local law enforcement Chiefs have been invited to attend the December 17th Board of County
Commissioners' meeting to show their support for this program.
I would appreciate your support and approval of this program.
Sincerely,
Gary C. Wheeler, Sheriff
DECEMBER 17, 1996 34
Sheriff Gary Wheeler explained that the program being
presented allows local law enforcement access to military
equipment. This program just came to his attention this year and
is expected to be phased out over the next several years.
The chief pilot for the City of Miami advised that their
equipment will be listed for acquisition. The engines alone are
worth about $293,000 each.
Chief Hugh Cox of Indian River Shores supported the Sheriff's
interest in this program and cited several instances where his
department found it necessary to call for a helicopter. In one
instance they spent about 8 hours on foot with canine assistance
trying to locate a boatload of Haitians. He then called for the
St. Lucie County helicopter and in about 2 hours they had located
16 people. The helicopter is a unique tool and will certainly
enhance local law enforcement.
Chairman_ Adams wanted to know whether Chief Cox would be
willing to help financially, and __Chief Cox responded -that it was
his understanding that there would be no cost for the first year,
but he believed that Indian River Shores would be willing to do
their fair share.
Chief Jim Gabbard of the City of Vero Beach wanted the Board
to be aware that our local law enforcement agencies have the kind
of cooperative relationship which has never before existed in this
county and probably does not exist anywhere else in the State of
Florida. Everyone is joined in their support of Sheriff Wheeler.
He also wanted the Board to know that, in his opinion, Sheriff
Wheeler had been re-elected by an overwhelming majority partly
because his chief concern is for the safety of this county's
residents. The helicopter may not be a necessity at this point in
time but public safety concerns occasioned by the growth of the
County will make it a necessity very soon. He felt everyone should
put politics aside and support the Sheriff. It has taken courage
and a willingness to accept criticism to bring this program to the
taxpayers and Sheriff Wheeler's interests are solely for public
safety.
Chief Larry Tippins of Fellsmere also supported Sheriff
Wheeler's endeavors to obtain the aircraft. He stated that he also
has had to call on St. Lucie County for their helicopter and
remarked that when you need one, nothing else can take its place.
He felt it will be a great asset to law enforcement.
DECEMBER 17, 199635 AP PA --42
4
Chief Randy White of Sebastian also wanted to lend his
support. He remarked that he had retired from Jacksonville law
enforcement where they had helicopters over 20 years ago and he is
aware of their value. They provide invaluable assistance in
spotting fires, locating people and objects, directing ground
units, riot assistance and ferrying of emergency personnel.
Tom Buchanan of 150 Week Road added his support and cited an
recent instance when a helicopter would have proven invaluable.
There was a burglary at Horizon Outlet Mall and, had a helicopter
been available, the thieves might have been apprehended. He also
felt that possibly Osceola County would help with the cost.
Chairman Adams queried whether this would be a med-evac unit,
and Sheriff Wheeler responded that it is not strictly for law
enforcement. In an emergency situation, it could be used in some
instances to ferry paramedics to emergency scenes. It would also
prove its worth in emergencies such as the recent plane crash in
the western part of the county where it took them over an hour just
to get to the scene. In such an event, personnel must travel over
and around private ranch and grove properties which involves
intimate knowledge of the local geography. Calling for backup
assistance to one of these locations is very difficult when
personnel are unfamiliar with the terrain and unsure of how to
reach the site. A helicopter would be able to quickly direct ground
units.
Sheriff Wheeler reiterated that the biggest advantage to this
program is that the only cost other than incidentals will be
operating costs. He believed we will have enough funds from the
Broward County prisoner program to operate the helicopter for this
year. The equipment is virtually free of cost and the County will
have zero invested. He anticipated an annual operating expense of
$200,000 per year. Also needed will be a temporary hangar for
storage, until we rent or build one for permanent use. We will be
storing and cannibalizing parts which we will get from the federal
government. We also will be able to swap warehoused parts with
other agencies. If we decide to drop out of the program, the
equipment would be returned to the federal government.
Sheriff Wheeler then ran a video for the Board demonstrating
some of the uses of a helicopter to local law enforcement.
DECEMBER 17, 1996 36
r
Commissioner Macht wanted to know what the inventory will be,
and Sheriff Wheeler listed two fully operational helicopters with
approximately 200 hours on each, and 2 new, 500 -hour warranty
engines which will give us 13,000 flying hours.
Commissioners Ginn, Macht and Eggert expressed their support
for the project.
Joseph Giffanti, a concerned citizen, spoke out against tax
dollars being squandered and felt this would be an extravagant use
of public funds. Mr. Giffanti felt that local taxpayers are
saturated with useless and unwarranted police activity and asked
the Board not to approve the project.
Commissioner Eggert questioned whether the funds for salaries
would be coming from the Broward County prisoner program funds.
John Gallagher felt this would be a very valuable asset with
invaluable benefits to law enforcement personnel morale.
Sheriff Wheeler pointed out that the Sheriff's budget over the
past several years has actually had a zero percent increase and
that he would not be surprised to be returning a decent sum back to
the Commissioners at the end of the year.
MOTION WAS MADE by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by
Commissioner Macht, that the Board approve two
additional positions for the Sheriff's Office; a
sworn helicopter pilot and a civilian helicopter
mechanic, as requested by Sheriff Wheeler.
Under discussion, in response to queries from the Board,
Sheriff Wheeler stated that he did not anticipate needing any
monies from the general contingencies fund this year.
Commissioner Ginn remarked that this is a terrific program and
she is very much in favor.
Bill Koolage felt that as a conservative citizen he could
support the Sheriff's request. The county is rapidly expanding to
the west and he believed this is an important step forward
0
DECEMBER 17, 1996 3 FaG
THE CHAIRMAN CALLED THE
Motion passed unanimously.
QUESTION and the
. pace 45
PUBLIC HEARING - RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING XL VISION, INC.
TO ISSUE REVENUE BONDS NOT TO EXCEED $5,000,000
PRESS -JOURNAL
NOTICE OF PMC NEARiMa
Published Daily
Notice Is hereby giver, that the Board of County
Commissioners of incus ► River County, Fbrda (the
" Courrty'1 will the approval of an issue of
Vero Beach Indian River County,Florida
hdustrei �t revenue bonds to be lin
by the County the to prhN* amatmt of
COUNTY OF INDIAN RIVER: STATE OF FLORIDA
rot to exceed 55,000
$5.000.000 Revenue eorws .
the Darryl
otheaurPress
act), 1998 (the "Bands at a public ryrdus�c�
held at a rreegBW1� meeft an f
oath says�fore
that he is President Joumaladafl p�bp �p19N,
may be
AM orChambers,
brV
in Indian River County, Florida: that the attached copy of adverHsernent, bekg
Beard, C mftsion 840 25th thh
Street. Vero Beach, Florida,
The Voceeds of such Bad Isere will be used to ()
--g�bif-�j
pay a1 or any part of the cost of issuance of the
Bonds: (� al or any part of the cost of aoqu4-
.���
in the matter of �ff.Ydf/cr�:C`LLI?� ��
the Pn*
act and (61) otter cost permitted by W
POMThe
"Project. isdescrI as a 82,000 square foot
and office
amfeces) t(xdYretated
et�pport ted i mdsrlacdae htflg V
In the Court
Bads shell and w® be from revenues
eTand
wfl9 P
payable
derived from the XL Realty,
the =and vrtl not debt,
Ushed in said newspaper in the Issues of 9 g
constitute a general
ar general athlgetbn of trh W; Ricer
the to of Picnics, ar enry other poltical
subftilon thereof.
Al Interested parties are Invited to present their
oararhants at the tics and pipe seam abova
Affiant further says that the said Press-Joumal is a newspaper published at Vero Beach, In
anyiohs are advised that It they decide to appeal
dem shade at this marj tfryr need a
said Wan River that ire said newspaper has heretofore been
record h
the proms, and lar such purpose,
cxxhtirarously published InsaidIndian River Florida' each dally and has been entered as
they may need tI e that a record
y
second class mad matter at the post office in Vero Beach. in saidIridian Rhrer Cfltxhty, Florida,
ma
the is made. which recoil Incudes the
ft record e
for a period of one year next preceding the first publication of the affected copy of
andevidence upon which the appeal is to
advertisement; and affiant further says that he has neither paid nor promised any person, firm
w tion any discount, rebate, commission or refund for the purpose of securing ids
sWoners
BoardRi of Cohmty County,
Florida khdiarh Rhrer t;,ohshty, Fbrda
for publication in said newspaper.
Interested p� fey appear at the mea" and
?FS l
to:4Vcribed before
lobe heardwtawa to respect to the proposed opooreddina�
r,Q;•'•Swom nre this day of—&—O--A.D.
s
mance may do so at the Office of they Cleric to the
Board, 1840 25th Street, Vero Beach, Florida.
•
Ml' Comm. Expires': s - I�.
Anyone who a f to appeal any cession
+L
August 25,1997 : 5 (resident)
ewhich
arra be nsure meeting vhn11 meed to erhsure
that a verbatim record of the aoceedhgs Is shade.
No. =IONS SANDRA A. PRESCOIT. N017ARY Matic.
State of Florida. My Commission &alp. August 25. 1997
which trxatiudes .tesiimmy and evidence upon which
the appealAnyone
�i •. P r
%' •• \Q,o``
who needs a special exaranodatfan for
this m mmay contact the Camty's Americans
�
�, ExL 223. �tA48 hours advance of the
Str¢hed• - a�
oto•' g3\^lrh� a- DgL'ct r
��i
DeC.2. m 1354359
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of December 10, 1996:
TO: Members of the Board
of County Commissioners
DATE: December 10, 1996
SUBJECT: PROPOSED RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING X L VISION, INC.
TO ISSUE REVENUE BONDS NOT TO EXCEED $5,000,000
PUBLIC HEARING
FROM: Joseph A Bair
OMB Director
The Board of County Commissioners at its regular meeting of November 26, 1996 approved the
advertising of the TEFRA (Tax Equity Fiscal Responsibility Act) and holding a public hearing to
consider a resolution authorizing X L Vision, Inc. to issue 55,000,000 in "tax exempt" industrial
revenue bonds to expand their manufacturing facility.
A copy of the proposed resolution is attached.
DECEMBER 17, 1996
38
The Chairman opened the public hearing and asked if anyone
wished to be heard in this matter. There being none, she closed
the public hearing.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Ginn, SECONDED by
Commissioner Tippin, the Board unanimously adopted
Resolution 96-159 approving the issuance of
industrial development revenue bonds in an amount
not to exceed $5,000,000; authorizing application by
the County for allocation of private activity bond
volume cap for such bonds; declaring its official
intent that the proceeds of such bonds be used for
reimbursements; and providing an effective date.
RESOLUTION NO. 96-159
A RESOLUTION OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA,
APPROVING THE ISSUANCE OF INDUSTRIAL
DEVELOPMENT REVENUE BONDS IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO
EXCEED 55,000,000; AUTHORIZING APPLICATION BY THE
COUNTY FOR ALLOCATION OF PRIVATE ACTIVITY BOND
VOLUME CAP FOR SUCH BONDS; DECLARING ITS
OFFICIAL INTENT THAT THE PROCEEDS OF SUCH BONDS
BE USED FOR REIMBURSEMENTS; AND PROVIDING AN
EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, Indian River County, Florida (the "County") has the authority under
the Florida Industrial Development Financing Act, Part II, of Chapter 159, Florida
Statutes, as amended (the "Industrial Act") to issue revenue bonds for the purpose
of financing industrial development facilities; and
WHEREAS, XL Realty, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Borrower") has
requested that the County issue its industrial development revenue bonds (the
"Bonds") in the principal amount not to exceed $5,000,000; and
WHEREAS, the proceeds of such Bonds will be used to (i) pay all or any part
of the cost of issuance of the Bonds; (ii) pay all or any part of the cost of acquiring,
constructing, erecting and improving a 62,000 square foot manufacturing facility (and
directly related office and support facilities) used to manufacture imaging systems (the
"Project"); and (iii) to pay any other cost permitted by applicable law,
WHEREAS, Part VI of Chapter 159, Florida Statutes, provides for allocation of
the private activity bond volume cap for the State of Florida and pursuant thereto,
local agencies such as and including the County must obtain and submit to the State
of Florida, Division of Bond Finance, written certification of approval by applicable
elected official as required by Section 147(f) of the U.S. Internal Revenue Code (the
"Tax Code") and may thereafter file a notice of intent to issue private activity bonds
and request a written confirmation of volume cap allocation in order to be able to
issue such bond; and
WHEREAS, the Board of Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida (the
"Board") is the local elected official for the County as that term is used in Section
147(f) of the Tax Code and, as such, the Board may give the required approval for the
County to issue such bonds only after conduct of a public hearing held after
publication of reasonable notice; and
DECEMBER 17, 1996
39
6
WHEREAS, the Board desired to declare its official intent that the proceeds of
the Bonds be used for reimbursement as required by Treasury Regulation, Section
1.150-2; and
WHEREAS, prior to adoption of this Resolution, the Board conducted such
public hearing on December 17, 1996, NOW THEREFORE,
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Commissioners of Indian River County,
Florida:
SECTION 1. The authorization for issuance of the Bonds by the County in the
principal amount not to exceed $5,000,000 for the purposes set forth above is hereby
approved.
SECTION 2. The Board hereby authorizes issuance of Industrial Development
Revenue Bonds by the County in an amount not to exceed $5,000,000, such
authorization being given for purposes of satisfying Part VI of Chapter 159, Florida
Statutes, as well as Section 147(f) of the Tax Code.
SECTION 3. The Board hereby authorizes the Chairman of the Board to apply
for private activity bond volume cap allocation for the calendar year 1997 pursuant
to Part VI of Chapter 159, Florida Statutes, including a carryforward allocation of any
allocation obtained for 1997.
SECTION 4. The Board hereby declares its intent that the proceeds of the
Bonds be used by the Borrower, in part, for reimbursement of costs incurred by the
Borrower related to the Project prior to the date the Bonds are issued.
SECTION 5. The approval by the Board herein does not constitute an
endorsement to a prospective purchaser of the Bonds, of the credit worthiness of the
Project or any tenant therein, and the Bonds shall not constitute an indebtedness or
obligation of the State of Florida or of any county, any municipal corporation, or
political subdivision but the Bonds shall be a limited obligation of the County payable
solely from the revenues derived from the Project and the other pledge and revenues
described therein to the payment thereof and no holder of the Bonds shall ever have
the right to c-ompel any exercise of the taxing powers of the State of Florida or of any
county, municipal corporation, or political subdivision thereof (including the County),
nor to enforce the payment thereof against any property of the State of Florida or of
any county, municipal corporation, or political subdivision (including the County).
SECTION 6. This Resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption.
ADOPTED: Resolution No.gF _ q adopted thi17
s day of December, 1996.
ATTESTED:
�� ; +_ ,.sem',, �..m �'•,
Name: -Z--K . LA P�:ToM
Title• I,paQ,���
d
1 'anV88Wute
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS,
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
By: �Jr .�_ C�IQ�y�yj
Name•
Title: FRAIY B. ADAMS
CHAIRMAN
DECEMBER 17, 1996 40
Inman Rivw Ca Apc'oved Dale
Amin
Leial
7
i.
Dec.
F -.!SK Mgr.
11/20/96 WED 09:28 FAX 904 419 1515 DIV. OF BOND FINANCE 1aJ015
Di.Won Serial No.
Prior Division Serial No.
STATE OF FLORIDA DIVISION OF BOND FINANCE
NOTICE OF INTENT TO ISSUE BONDS AND REQUEST FOR WRITTEN CONFIRMATION
\RT II (to be completed by applicant)
Date-.
Name, address and phone number of person who prepared this Notice (confirmation or rejection will be sent to this
person unless otherwise directed):
Name: David J. Hull Phone: 9( 04 )224-9115
Address: Post Office Bog 391
Tallahassee, Florida 32302
Issuing Agency- Indian River County
Company (if applicable)- %L Realty, Inc., a Delaware corporation
Requested Amount: $
Is this a Supplementary Notice? Yes No
Check one of the following:
Manufacturing Facility (as defined in Section 159.803(10), F.S.) XX
Florida Fust Business Project (as defined in Section 159.803(l 1), F.S.)
(Florida Depvtment of Commerce certification must be attached)
Multifamily Housing Single Family Housing Other
(If "Other",specify)
Is this a Priority Project under State law? Yes No XX
Purpose: To pay all or any part of the cost of issuance of the bonds nay all or any part of cost
of acquiring, constructing, erecting, and improving a 62,000 square foot manufacturing facility
(and directly related office and support facilities) used to manufarture imayina eXat_ eiR and to
pay other costs permitted by applicable law.
s. 147(f) or similar IRC Approval Date:
Contemplated Date(s) of Issue:
Approving Authority (Unit of Government): Indian River County
Agency Official and Title- Chairman, Board of Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE ELECTED OFFICIAL OR VOTER APPROVAL REQUIRED PURSUANT TO
t7(0 OF THE INTERNAL REVENUE CODE HAS BEEN OBTAINED ON THE DATE INDICATED ABOVE, AND
-IAT THE AMOUNT REASONABLY EXPECTED TO BE REQUIRED FOR THE FINANCING EQUALS AT
-AST 90% OF THE AMOUNT REQUESTED ABOVE.
;nature of Agency Official: Q--=66= z ( 1cle2l" /)
FRAN B. ADAMS CHAIRMAN xx
.: IPORTANTI Legal Opinion (Section 1S9.805(1), F.S.) enclosed;
$100.00 Filing Fee enclosed: XX
"RT1I (to be completed by the Division of Bond Finance)
Received by: Date and Time Received:
Adjusted Date Received (pursuant to Section 159.8081 or 159.8083, F.S.)
Status (conrvmed or rejected):
Arnow -it Confirmed: $ Confirmation Valid Through:
Amount Pending (if any): $ Comments:
Category of Confirmation:
Title: Dlreeter. Dlvielen of Rnnd Finanre
ISSUER IS HEREBY ADVISED THAT THIS CONFIRMATION IS CONDITIONAL AND SHALL NOT BE
CONSIDERED FINAL UNTIL AND UNLESS (1) THE DIVISION RECEIVES TIMELY NOTIFICATION OF
ISSUANCE OF THE BONDS PURSUANT TO SECTION 1S9.80S(S)(a), FLORIDA STATUTES, AND (2) THE
DIVISION HAS ISSUED ITS FINAL CONFIRMATION OF ALLOCATION (FORM BF 2007-B) WITH RESPECT
TO THE BONDS.
DECEMBER 17, 1996 4 1 LOO Pay- 4
PUBLIC HEARING - ESCAMBIA HOUSING AUTHORITY
INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT AND ISSUANCE OF REVENUE BONDS
NOT TO EXCEED $60,000,000
PRESS -JOURNAL
Published Daily
Vero Beach, Indian River County, Florida
COUNTY OF INDIAN RIVER: STATE OF FLORIDA
Before the undersigned authority personally appeared Daryl K. Hicks who an
oath says that he Is President of the Press-Joumal, a daily newspaper published at Vero Beach
in Indian that
County, Florida; that the attached copy of advertisement, being
in the matter of d --fly/ „k -Q ] �Je ems_
In the
pelted in said newspaper in the issues of
Court, was pub -
Affiant further says that the said Press -Journal is a newspaper published at Vero Beach, In
said Indian River County, Florida, and that the said newspaper has heretofore been
continualsty published in said Indian River County, Florida, each daily and has been entered as
second class mail matte at the post office in Vero Beach, In said Indian River County, Florida,
for a period of one year next preceding the first publication of the attached copy of
advertisement; and affiant further says that he has neither paid nor promised any- person, firm
or corporation any discount, rebate, commission or refund for the purpose of securing this
aft.tsement for publication in said newspaper.
PA A:PR;r�'
p� Swom to'QINN.Scribed before me this day of D. 19
L
My Comm. Expires: =
Augusl 25,1997 s4.NDRA A. PRESCOTr. NOTARY PUBLIC. (President)
No. CC310845 state of Florida. My Commfssfon Exp. August 25. 1997
►EP*q;LSEAL) OQ�pP -
•..
OF signed
Nrftarv: SA-nRA .t PRFSrCrr7
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
For the purpose o1 Section 147(f) m the internal
Revernue C=
m 1988. as amended, notice Is
a l8oerd 1hat the Hotakq Finance
m County m Indian
River Canty, Florid•, w�l caduct a public hearing
at their re arty scheduled meetkg on Tuesday,
Deoember 17, at 9:00 A.M. at Indian Film County
C milssion Chmnbms. 1840 25th St., Vero
Beach. Florida to consider them the issu-
ance by the Housktp Firm = m Escambia
Cocoedii
". .9n off Rim County and other
O.W0,000 - -- F- . Mortgage not Re
The proceeds of Suchsbbonds will be used to fi-
nw=be prkr�r byho ers�of
Mf1
mclerats, S.
Rim Costlyand ver" other axe in the
State of Florida
The bads will not constitift a debt of the State
of Florida, I dim River County,cotintles or ar outer parUdpat
bye Finom
peyeble solely peymeute remade fror n it*
revenues generated from the l 1, A program.
AN persons are advised that, If, they decide to ap-
peal any decision made at Vila mieeurgI they w!
Ea am m the proceedings, and for such pur- 1
pose. they may need to ensure that a verbatim
record m the praceedkgs Is made, which recce In-
cudes the testtrrnorny and evidence upon. which the ..
appeal k to be based.
AI kd d persona are hvfted to present their
comments at the tlme and p{ecg set font above.
C�C.ablorms Firm lBoerd m i
kmerested parties may appear at the meetkg and
be heard with respect to the proposed ordkmrnce.
MYOM Who wants to kle
.90 may do so at the Office m� na dark to%
Board. 1840 25th Street, Vero Bah, Florida.
matey uwho which
be madeeaat this wish meeftwill noo ersure
tlnat a verbaflm record of the proceedtrgs is made,
vvtilch kndudes testimony and evidence upon which
the appeal Is based.
Aryone who needs a special accoirmtodatlan for
this m
may contact the County's Annorkere
with Act (ADA, Coordinator at 587-
8000, EA 223. at West 48 hours in advance of the
Dee. 2,-1996 1354357
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of December 10, 1996:
TO: Members of the Board
of County Commissioners
DATE: December 10, 1996
SUBJECT: ' PROPOSED RESOLUTION AUTHORIZATION AND INTERLOCAL
AGREEMENT AND THE ISSUANCE OF REVENUE BONDS NOT TO
EXCEED $60,000,000 BY ESCAMBIA HOUSING AUTHORITY
PUBLIC HEARING
FROM: Joseph A
OMB Dir.
The Board of County Commissioners at its regular meeting of November 26, 1996 approved the
advertising of the TEFRA (Tax Equity Fiscal Responsibility Act) notice and holding a public hearing
to consider a resolution and interlocal agreement between Escambia County Housing Finance
Authority and Indian River County. If the Board of County Commissioners approves the resolution
and interlocal agreement, the County Attorney must issue an opinion letter and the chairperson must
sign the document "Notice of Intent to Issue Bonds and Request Written Confirmation".
DECEMBER 17, 1996 42
�J�
The Chairman opened the public hearing and asked if anyone
wished to be heard in this matter. There being none, she closed
the public hearing.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by
Commissioner Tippin, the Board unanimously adopted
Resolution 96-160 authorizing the Escambia County
Housing Finance Authority to operate within the
boundaries of Indian River County; authorizing the
Board to enter into Agreements with the Escambia
County Housing Finance Authority and to execute and
deliver certain documents and instruments in
connection therewith; approving a form of Interlocal
Agreement; approving the issuance by the Escambia
County Housing Finance Authority of not exceeding
$60,000,000 single family mortgage revenue bonds,
Series 1997 (Multi -County Program), pursuant to
Section 147)f) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986,
as amended; and providing_an effective date.
RESOLUTION NO. 96-160
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COM MSSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY,
FLORIDA, AUTHORIZING THE ESCAMBIA COUNTY
HOUSING FINANCE AUTHORITY TO OPERATE WITHIN
THE BOUNDARIES OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY;
AUTHORIZING THE BOARD TO ENTER INTO
AGREEMENTS WITH THE ESCAM 31A COUNTY HOUSING
FINANCE AUTHORITY AND TO EXECUTE AND DELIVER
CERTAIN DOCUMENTS AND INSTRUMENTS IN
CONNECTION THEREWITH; APPROVING A FORM OF
INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT; APPROVING THE ISSUANCE
BY THE ESCAM 31A COUNTY HOUSING FINANCE
AUTHORITY OF NOT EXCEEDING $60,000,000 SINGLE
FAPMY MORTGAGE REVENUE BONDS, SERIES 1997
(MULTI -COUNTY PROGRAM), PURSUANT TO SECTION
1470 OF THE INTERNAL REVENUE CODE OF 1956, AS
AMENDED; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, Chapter 159, Part IV, Florida Statutes (the "Act") authorized
counties to create housing finance authorities to exercise powers of the Act within
their boundaries or outside their boundaries with the consent of the governing body of
the territory outside their area of operation; and
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Escambia County Florida,
on May 29, 1980, adopted Ordinance No. 80-12, by which it created the Escambia
County Housing Finance Authority (the "Authority") and authorized the Authority to
exercise all powers under the Act; and -
WHEREAS, there is no housing finance authority currently operating in Indian
River County; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to the Act the Board of County Commissioners of Indian
River County Florida, has found a shortage of affordable housing and capital for
investment therein and a need for a housing finance authority to function in Indian
River County; and
WHEREAS, it is not practicable at this time under existing Florida and federal
laws and regulations for a single local agency to issue its bonds for the purpose of
implementing a single family housing program, although the shortage of such single
family housing and capital for investment therein is continuing in Indian River
County; and
DECEMBER 17, 1996 43
k'.51.
WHEREAS, the Authority has by resolution duly adopted on July 2, 1996 (the
"Escambia Resolution") authorized the issuance of not exceeding $60,000,000 Single
Family Mortgage Revenue Bonds, Series 1997 (Multi -County program) (the "Bonds"),
and has indicated to the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County its
willingness to exercise its powers in Indian River County to finance single family
housing therein as permitted by the Act upon approval of the Board of County
Commissioners of Indian River County; and
WHEREAS. Section 147(0 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended
(hereinafter referred to as the "Code") requires public approval of certain private
activity bonds by an applicable elected representative or governmental unit following a
public hearing and the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County,
Florida (the "Board"), constitutes an applicable elected representative or governmental
unit; and
WHEREAS. pursuant to Section 147(1) of the Code a public hearing was
scheduled before the Board for ,+J / 7 , 199-C, and notice of such hearing was
given in the form required by the Code by publication more than 14 days prior to such
hearing; and
WHEREAS. the Board has on .&ee r�'_iZV i 7 , 1994, held the public hearing
and provided at such hearing reasonable opportunity for all interested individuals to
express their views, both orally and in writing, on the issuance of the Bonds; and
WHEREAS, the Board diligently and conscientiously considered all comments
and concerns expressed by such individuals; and
WHEREAS, the Board desires to express its approval of the action to be taken
Pursuant to the Escambia Resolution and as required by Section 147(fl of the Code;
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY
CONOWSSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA:
Section 1. Because of the continuing shortage of affordable single family
housing and capital for investment therein in Indian River County and the continuing
impediments to a bond issue to alleviate such shortages as to single family housing, it
is hereby determined that the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County
consents to the Authority exercising its powers to issue the Bonds and to implement a
program from a portion of the proceeds of the Bonds to finance single family housing
within the statutory boundaries of Indin River County; provided, that the Authority
and Indian River County first enter into a written agreement setting forth the powers,
duties and limitations of the Authority as they pertain to the use of said bond proceeds
within Indian River County and payment of the issuance costs for such Bonds.
Section 2. In furtherance of the purposes set forth in Section 1 hereof the
Chairman or Vice -Chairman and Clerk or Deputy Clerk of the Board of County
Commissioners of Indian River County are hereby authorized to execute such
consents, intergovernmental agreements, applications or other documents as shall be
required to implement such single family housing program and to provide for payment
of Indian River County's proportionate share of costs of issuance of such Bonds, all as
shall be approved by counsel to Indian River County.
Section 3. The Interlocal Agreement, in substantially the form attached
hereto as Exhibit 'W', and made a part hereof, between Indian River County and the
Authority is hereby approved. The officers of Indian River County are, hereby
authorized to enter into the Interlocal Agreement on behalf of Indian River County,
with such changes not inconsistent herewith as the officers executing same may
approve, such execution and delivery to be conclusive evidence of such approval. The
appropriate officers of Indian River County are hereby further authorized to execute
and deliver such other documents and instruments as may be necessary to implement
the Interlocal Agreement, including, without limitation, application for up to the
maximum available private activity bond volume allocations pursuant to Chapter 159,
Part VI, Florida Statutes, for the purposes set forth in the Interlocal Agreement.
Section 4. The Board hereby approves, within the meaning of Section 147(fl
of the Code, the issuance by the Authority of not exceeding $60,000,000 Single Family
Mortgage Revenue Bonds, Series 1997 (Multi -County Program), and such other action
to be taken pursuant to the Escambia Resolution.
Section 5. All o
resolutions
ct with the
provisions he ein c ntainedare, o the extent f such conflict, her by perseded and
repealed.
tion of this
expenditure of any funds of Indian River County toolution es not paythe costs of issuance orize or the
such
Bonds.
DECEMBER 17, 1996 44
0
� � s
Section 7. This Resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption.
Duly adopted in the 'session this .1Z day of A -et. , 199,.
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
(SEAL..)
ATTEST: By: HiQ.►- VJ
Chairman, Board of County
o �~e.. Commissioners
ti `_
Cl and of Co ty Commissioners
U
Exhibit "A"
FORM OF
INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT
THIS AGREEMENT made and entered into this L7— day of_, 1996 , by
and between the ESCAMBIA COUNTY HOUSING FINANCE AUTHORITY, a public
body corporate and politic organized and existing under the laws of the State of Florida
(hereinafter referred to as the "Escambia Authority"), and INDIAN RIVER COUNTY,
FLORIDA, a political subdivision of the State of Florida (hereinafter referred to as the
'Participating County");
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, Part IV of Chapter 159 of the Florida Statutes authorizes the
creation of housing finance authorities within the State of Florida (the "State") for the
purpose of issuing revenue bonds to assist in relieving the shortage of housing
available at prices or rentals which many persons and families can afford; and
WHEREAS, the Escambia Authority has resolved to issue not exceeding
$60,000,000 Single Family Mortgage Revenue Bonds. Series 1997 (Multi -County
Program) (the "1997 Escambia Bonds"); and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Sections 143 and 146 of the Internal Revenue Code of
1986. as amended (the "Code"), the amount of Mortgage Subsidy Bonds which may be
issued in each year is limited by a private activity volume cap which has been
established for such purpose within the State. and
WHEREAS. the limitations upon available portions of the volume cap prevent
the separate issuance of bonds for each county from being feasibly and economically
accomplished; and
WHEREAS, the Escambia Authority has authorized a sufficient amount of 1997
Escambia Bonds to fund the anticipated demand during the proposed Origination
Period for qualifying single family mortgages of both Escambia County and Indian
River County, as well as certain other counties which may also participate in a joint
bond program; and
WHEREAS, the aggregation of mortgage loan demand and the securing of the
related amount of the State volume cap (the "Allocation Amount") granted by the State
through 1997 (the "Authorization Period") for the purpose of issuing bonds to finance
qualifying single family development (the 'Bonds") will result in a wider allocation of
fixed expenses and certain rather economies of scale; and
WHEREAS, unless such economies are realized, the issuance of Mortgage
Subsidy Bonds would be less economical resulting in higher mortgage costs to
qualified mortgagors; and
WHEREAS, Sections 159.603 and 159.604, Florida Statutes, authorize Indian
River County to approve the issuance of revenue bonds through the Escambia
Authority to alleviate the shortage of affordable housing within the Participating
County, which approval has been granted by a resolution of the Board of County
DECEMBER 17, 1996
45
!' 00 qtr;
J
53
-0 PAG"
Commissioners of the Participating County adopted on 199. (the
"County Resolution"); and
WHEREAS, Sections 163.01, 159.608 and 125.01, Florida Statutes, and the
County Resolution authorize this Agreement by conferring the authority to exercise or
contract by agreement upon the Escambia Authority to exercise those powers which
are common to it and the other parties hereto and to include the Participating County
within the Escambia Authority's area of operation pursuant to 'Florida Statutes,
Section 159.603(1) for the purpose of issuing bonds based on the Allocation Amount to
(1) make available funds to finance qualifying single family housing development
located within the Participating County in accordance herewith, (2) establish the
reserves therefor, and (3) pay the costs of issuance thereof (collectively, the "Program").
NOW THEREFORE, the parties agree as follows:
Section 1. AUocation Amount; Substitution of Bonds. The Participating
County hereby authorizes the Escambia Authority to issue Single Family Mortgage
Revenue Bonds from time to time based on the Allocation Amount for the purpose of
financing the program and making funds available for qualifying single family housing
developments in the Participating County. Any 1997 Escambia Bonds issued for such
purposes in the Participating County are hereby deemed to be in full substitution for
an equivalent principal amount of the Participating County's bonds which could have
been issued for such purpose. The Participating County hereby authorizes the
Escambia Authority to utilize the Participating County's Allocation Amount on behalf
of the Participating County for the purpose of financing the Program, including, among
other things, funding of qualifying single family mortgages in the Participating County,
and the Escambia Authority is hereby designated as the bond issuing authority for the
Participating County during the Authorization Period with respect to such Allocation
Amounts. The proceeds of the Bonds shall be allocated and applied to the funding of
mortgage loans within the various Participating Counties and for reserves and the
payment of costs of issuing the Bonds, all in accordance with final program
documents approved by the Escambia Authority. All revenues generated by bonds
issued pursuant to this Agreement and by the use of the proceeds thereof, will be
administered by the Escambia Authority or its agents and all payments due from such
revenues shall be paid by the Escambia Authority or its agents without further action
by the Participating County.
Section 2. Administration. The Escambia Authority hereby assumes
responsibility for administering this Agreement by and through its employees, agents
and officers; provided, however, that the Participating County retains and reserves its
right and obligation to require reasonable reporting on programs designed for and
operated within the Participating County, including, but not limited, to, reasonably
available mortgagor or profile data. The Escambia Authority and its agents shall
provide the Participating County with such reports as may be necessary to account for
funds generated by this Agreement.
The Escambia Authority shall have full authority and responsibilityto
negotiate, define, validate, market, sell, issue and deliver its Bonds in the maxium
Allocation Amount, based upon mortgage loan demand, permitted by law to finance
qualifying single family housing developments in the Participating County and to take
such other action as may be necessary or convenient to accomplish such purpose.
Each Participating County may apply for the full allocation amount available for such
County. It is agreed that the Allocation Amount for the Bonds in Indian River County
and other Participating Counties located within the same bond volume allocation
region under Section 159.804, Florida Statutes, shall be allocated ratably between
Indian River County and such other Participating Counties within such region based
upon lender demand. All lendable proceeds of the Bonds attributable to the mortgage
loan demand in Indian River County shall be reserved for use in originating mortgage
loans in Indian River County for an initial period of 120 days.
The issuance and administration costs and expenses related to the Bonds
Issued to finance the housing program and administration of such program shall be
paid from proceeds of the Bonds and revenues generated from the housing program.
Section 3. Program Parameters. (a) Upon request of the Escambia
Authority, the Participating County shall, to the extent permitted by law, (1) approve,
establish, and update, from time to time as necessary, upon the request of the
Escambia Authority, such program parameters including, but not limited to,
maximum housing price and maximum adjusted family income for eligible borrowers,
as may be required for any bonds issued by the Escambia Authority pursuant to this
Agreement and (ii) approve the allocation of mortgage loan moneys for each Participant
offering to originate Mortgage Loans within the Participating County. Unless otherwise
notified in writing by the Participating County, the Escambia Authority may from time
to time approve and establish such maximum price and family income amounts at the
maximum levels provided pursuant to the Code without further action of the
Participating County. -
DECEMBER 17, 1996 46
(b) The fees and expenses of the Participating County shall be paid from the
proceeds of the program in the manner and to the extent mutually agreed upon by the
officials of the Participating County and the Escambia Authority at or prior to issuance
of the 1997 Escambia Bonds.
Section 4. Term. This Agreement will remain in full force and effect from
the date of its execution until such time as it is terminated by any party upon 10 days
written notice to the other party hereto. Notwithstanding the foregoing, it is agreed
that this Agreement may not be terminated by the Participating County during the
Authorization Period, or by any party during any period that the Bonds issued
pursuant to the terms hereof remain outstanding, or during any period in which the
proceeds of such Bonds are still in the possession of the Escambia Authority or its
agents pending distribution, unless either (1) the parties to this Agreement mutually
agree in writing to the terms of such termination or (2) such termination, by its terms,
only applies prospectively to the authorization to issue Bonds for which no Allocation
Amount has been obtained and for which no purchase contract has been entered into.
It is further agreed that in the event of termination the parties to this Agreement will
provide continuing cooperation to each other in fulfilling the obligations associated
with the issuance of bonds pursuant to this Agreement.
Section 8. Indemnity. To the full extent permitted by law, the Escambia
Authority agrees to hold the Participating County harmless from any and all liability
for repayment of principal of and interest or penalty on the Bonds, and the members
and officials of the Participating County harmless from any and all liability in
connection with the approval rendered pursuant to Sections 159.603 and 159.604,
Florida Statutes. The Escambia Authority agrees that any offering, circular or official
statement approved by and used in marketing the 1997 Escambia Bonds will include
a statement to the effect that Bondowners may not look to the Participating County for
payment of the Bonds and interest or premium thereon.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF. the parties to this Agreement have caused their
names to be affixed hereto by the proper officers thereof as of the Z day of
199L.
(SEAL)
ATTEST.
MAO
W _--W
Cleric i . �.e-•
V
DECEMBER 17, 1996 47
ESCANa3IA COUN7T HOUSING
FINANCE AUTHORITY
I. I
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
Chairman FPAN S. ADS M.3
Prior Division Serial No.
STATE OF FLORIDA DIVISION OF BOND FINANCE
NOTICE OF INTENT TO ISSUE BONDS AND REQUEST FOR WRITTEN CONFIRMATION
ART I (to be completed by applicant)
Date: december 17. 1996
Name, address and phone number of person who prepared this Notice (confirmation or rejection
will be sent to this person unless otherwise directed):
Name: Ed Bulleit c/o William R Hough 6 Co Phone:(813 ) 895-8880
Address: 100 Second Avenue South, Suite 800
St. Petersburg, Florida 33701
Issuing Agency: Escambia County Housing Finance Authority
Company (if applicable):
Requested Amount: $
Is This a Supplementary Notice?: Yes No x
Check one of the following:
Manufacturing Facility (as defined in Section 159.803(10), F.S.)
Florida First Business Project (as defined in Section 159.803(l 1), F.S.) -
(Florida Department of Commerce certification must be attached)
Multi -Family Housing Single Family Housing x Other
(If "Other", specify)
Is this a Priority Project under State Law? Yes No x
Purpose: To Provide affordable mortgages to low, middle and moderate income first-
time homebuvers in Indian River County
s. 147(0 or similar IRC Approval Date: December 17, 1996
Contemplated Date(s) of Issue: Februarv, 1997
Approving Authority (Unit of Government): Indian River County Board of County Commissioners
Agency Official and Title: Fran B. Adams . Chairman
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE ELECTED OFFICIAL OR VOTER APPROVAL REQUIRED
PURSUANT TO 147(f) OF THE INTERNAL REVENUE CODE HAS BEEN OBTAINED ON THE
DATE INDICATED ABOVE, AND THAT THE AMOUNT REASONABLY EXPECTED TO BE
REQUIRED FOR THE FINANCING EQUALS AT LEAST 90% OF THE AMOUNT REQUESTED
ABOVE.
Signature of Agency Official:' 7Q L i
IMPORTANT! Legal Opinion (Section 159.805(1), F.S.) enclosed. -
$100. 00
nclosed:
$100.00 Filing Fee enclosed:
PART II (to be completed by the Division of Bond Finance)
Received by: Date and Time Received:
Adjusted Date Received (pursuant to Section 159-8081 or 159-8083, F.S.):
Status (confirmed or rejected):
Amount Confirmed: $ - Confirmation Valid Through:
Amount Pending (if any): $
Category of Confirmation:,
Comments:
Title: Director. Division of Bond Finance
ISSUER IS HEREBY ADVISED THAT THIS CONFIRMATION IS CONDITIONAL AND SHALL
NOT BE CONSIDERED FINAL UNTIL AND UNLESS (1) THE DIVISION RECEIVES TIMELY
NOTIFICATION OF ISSUANCE OF THE BONDS PURSUANT TO SECTION 159-805(5)(x),
FLORIDA STATUTES, AN) (2) THE DIVISION HAS ISSUED ITS FINAL CONFIRMATION OF
ALLOCATION (FORM BF 2007-B) WITH RESPECT TO THE BONDS.
DECEMBER 17, 1996
48
r
® s �
PUBLIC HEARING - STONE,BRIDGE, INC. - REQUEST FOR PLANNED
DEVELOPMENT SPECIAL EXCEPTION AND PRELIMINARY PLAT
APPROVAL FOR STONEBRIDGE NORTH
PRESS -JOURNAL
Published Daily
Vero Beach, Indian River County, Florida
COUNTY OF INDIAN RIVER: STATE OF FLORIDA
Before the undersigned authority personally appeared Darryl K. Hacks who on
oath says that he Is President of the Press- loumal, a daily newspaper published at Vero Beach
in Indian River County, Florida; that the attached copy of advertisement, being
In the matter of
in the Court, was s o I� 9n pub}
�
lished in said newspaper in the issue
Affiant further says that the said Press-Joumal is a newspaper published at Vero Beach, in
said Indian River County, Florida, and that the said newspaper has heretofore been
continuously published In said Indian River County, Florida, each dally and has been entered as
second class mail matter at the post office in Vero Beach, in said adian River County, Florida,
for a period of one year next preceding the first publication of the attached copy of
advertisement; and affiant further says that he has neither paid nor promised any person, firm
or corporation any discount, rebate, commission or refund for the purpose of searing this
advertisement for publication in said newspaper.
M066.n8...,.,
P sac;; io + lbscribed before me thlsT day of Vv' D. 1
�Nly Comm. Expires. s
August 25, 1997 a' SANDRA A. PRESCOTT. NOTARY PLfUX (President)
No. CC31080.5 = Siete o: Florida. My ==nRap. August 25, 1 7
PA' sF-A�l PLOP
O F F10 'a signed J
Noterv: SANDRA A. PRE'SC n
8TH ST
Subject;
Site
t
(' N
aI
__
4TH ST
A -t
S-3
STONEBRIDGE
SID
NOTICEOF PUBLIC HEARING
Corrected no,'P P from 11/26/98 pnbtcaaon
Nota of hearag to consider thegrerft of ape- i
curl exception use approval fo'r a 109 lot sage ;
family residential planned development to be W.
m� Norah. The property pre
id
In Sectiftw yby es T a sons. arc., 9.
33 3
See the above map for the and Range 39.
A public hearag at which parties in ahwm and
citizens shall have an opportwtiy to be heard, ww11
be held by the - Board ofCpunq �s of
andian Ryer cowry. Florida, In the Catrnty Commis-
sarh Chanhbes of the County Administration Build -
1 located at 1840 25th Street, Vero Beach, Far-
ah on Tuesday. December 17,1998 at 9:05 a.m:
Please direct pians ft -related Questions to the
current d wWWne t plamhahg section at 587-80W,
Ext. 242.Anyone Who Wishal any d9dalon
whish may be made at this m� will need
to en-
sure abet a verbatim record of the praheediro Is
made, what, includes testanary and evdece upon
which the appeal Is based
ANYONE WHO NEEDS A SPECIAL ACCOMMODA-
TION FOR THIS MEETING MUST CONTACT THE
COUNTY'S AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT
(ADA) COORDINATOR AT 58741000 X223 AT
LEAST 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE OF THE MEET-
ING.
WDIAN RIVER COUNTY
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
BY -s -Fran B. Adams
Nov.27,1998 1353907
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of December 11, 1996:
TO: James Chandler
County Administrator
DI ION HEAD CONCURRENCE:
fe
Robert M. Keating; AI P/
Community Developm nt Dilrector
/4 -ii
THROUGH: Stan Boling, AICP
Planning Director
FROM: Eric Bladil
Staff Planner, Current Development
DATE: December 11, 1996
SUBJECT: Stonebridge, Inc. Is Request for Planned Development (PD)
Special Exception and Preliminary Plat Approval for a
Development to be Known as Stonebridge North
It is requested that the data herein presented be given formal
consideration by the Board of County Commissioners at its regular
meeting of December 17, 1996.
DECEMBER 17, 1996 49 3 p PAC-
DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS:
Stonebridge North is a proposed 46.69 acre single family
residential planned development. The proposed PD will establish
108 platted lots, common recreational areas, centralized stormwater
management system, and internal roadways within the boundaries of
the proposed preliminary plat for Stonebridge North. The subject
site is located on the north side of 4th Street in the 5300 block.
The property is zoned RS -3, Residential Single Family (up to 3
units per acre) and is to be developed at a density of 2.19 units
per acre.
The applicant proposes to target a specific housing market within
the density restriction for RS -3 zoning. In order to achieve the
design flexibility considered necessary, the applicant has chosen
to request lot size and sideyard building setback waivers through
the PD special exception use process. The purpose and intent of
the planned development (PD) special exception use approval process
is to allow development design flexibility while also promoting an
overall benefit for the county as a whole.
Staff has considered the compatibility of the proposed project on
surrounding properties, in terms of both existing and potential
uses. In order to enhance the project's compatibility and benefit
to the community, the applicant will provide perimeter landscape
buffering, larger perimeter lots, and provide for pedestrian
connections to yet -to -be -developed residentially designated
properties to the east and west.
The subject site, which is approximately 1,230' R 1,6601, is
comprised of two parcels of land previously utilized as a citrus
grove. Development of the site will create 108 lots, a wet
stormwater management tract, and on-site roadways. Approval of
this preliminary PD plan/plat permits construction of Stonebridge
North in two phases, 52 lots in Phase 1 and 56 lots in Phase 2.
Subject to the issuance of the land development permit, the
applicant has the ability to construct all infrastructure
improvements during Phase 1. Final platting will occur phase by
phase.
•Planning and Zoning Commission Recommendation and Board of County
Commissioners Consideration
At its regular meeting of November 21, 1996, the Planning and
Zoning Commission voted 5-0 to recommend that the Board of County
Commissioners grant special exception use approval subject to the
conditions stated in the recommendations section of this report
(see attachment #4). The Board is now to approve, approve with
conditions, or deny the special exception use request. In making
its decision, the Board must determine if the request is
appropriate for the subject property and surrounding areas. The
Board may then grant approval and attach any condition(s) and
safeguard(s) deemed appropriate to mitigate impacts and to ensure
compatibility of the use with surrounding areas.
The Planning and Zoning Commission granted preliminary plan/plat
approval subject to the Board granting the associated special
exception use request. Therefore, if the Board grants special
exception use approval, the preliminary plan/plat approval will be
in effect, and subject to the conditions approved by the Board.
ANALYSIS:
•Preliminary Plan/Plat:
I. Total Site Area: 46.69 acres
2. Zoning Classification: RS -3, Residential Single Family (up to
3 units per acre)
3. Land Use Designation: L-1, Low Density (up to 3 units per
acre)
4. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning:
North:
South:
East:
West:
DECEMBER 17, 1996
Citrus groves/A-1
4th Street, Stonebridge
Groves/RS-3
Citrus groves/A-1
50
(South)/RS-3
r
5. Proposed Density: 2.19 units per acre
6. Proposed Lot Size:
Normal RS -3 Minimum: 12,000 sq. ft.
Minimum Proposed: - 9,830 sq. ft.
Average Proposed: 12,592 sq. ft.
Note: The PD ordinance allows waivers of lot size and setback
requirements, all of which are discussed in detail later in
this report.
7. Open Space: Required: 40%
Provided: 448
8. Required Recreational Area:
1.30 acres required for the 108 proposed lots
1.39 acres passive recreation area provided
9. Phasing: The project is proposed to be constructed in 2
phases (see attachment #3), as follows:
Phase 1: 52 lots, centralized stormwater retention tract
(lake), a portion of internal roadways, and a 1.39
acre passive recreation tract.
Phase 2: 56 lots, remaining internal roadways, off-site
improvements.
Each phase will include the perimeter buffering improvements
and sidewalk improvements required for that phase.
10. Utilities: The proposed development will be serviced by
county utilities for both _potable water and wastewater
services. Connection to public utilities services is required
and is indicated on the preliminary plat. Provisions of water
and sewer services for the subdivision have been approved by
both the County Utilities Services and Environmental Health
Unit Services (HRS).
11. Traffic Circulation: The development will be accessed by a
single two-way roadway connection to 4th Street. The internal
roadway plan for the subdivision provides six cul-de-sacs
connecting to a single two-way looped roadway through the
development. County traffic engineering has approved the
proposed roadway layout.
County traffic engineering has reviewed and approved the
traffic analysis submitted for the project by the applicant's
engineer. The approved analysis indicates that, in Phase 2 of
the project, an eastbound left turn -lane at 4th Street and the
project entrance is required by the LDRs. Therefore, prior to
final plat approval for Phase 2, the eastbound 4th Street left
turn -lane must be constructed or contracted and bonded -out
pursuant to subdivision ordinance provisions. Furthermore,
the county traffic engineer has stated that, prior to the
issuance of a land development permit for the project,
construction plans for the left turn -lane must be approved and
incorporated into the land development plans.
12. Stormwater Management: The stormwater management plan
proposes the use of an excavated wet retention area (lake) on
the site. The stormwater management plan has been given
preliminary approval by the Public Works Department. Final
approval of the stormwater management plan and issuance of a
Type "B" stormwater permit shall occur upon issuance of a land
development permit for the project.
13. Environmental Issues: The subject site is greater than 5
acres and, therefore, is subject to the native upland
preservation requirements of section 929.07. Environmental
planning staff has determined that no native upland vegetative
community exists on the site. Therefore, no native upland
conservation areas need be established as a part of the
development.
The stormwater management system proposes an excavated wet
retention area (lake) greater than } acre. Therefore, the
developer must submit a littoral zone plan acceptable to the
DECEMBER 17, 1996 51 ,�� PAGI`-
J
_I
environmental planning staff prior to the issuance of the land
development permit.
Since the excavation of the lake will involve the removal of
more than 5,000 cubic yards of excavated material from the
site, the provisions of Chapter 934 mining regulations apply.
The developer is intending to excavate and haul from. the site
approximately 27,000 cubic yards. This excavation and hauling
activity is considered incidental to project construction.
Prior to issuance of a land development permit, the developer
must apply for and obtain a mining permit exemption from
staff. It is staff's understanding that the developer intends
to request a mining permit exemption. In order to qualify for
a mining permit exemption, the developer must demonstrate to
environmental planning staff, through the land development
permit review process, that all of the criteria of section
934.04(7)(b) are satisfied.
Since the subject site is, for the most part, surrounded by
active citrus groves, staff advised the applicant and Planning
and Zoning Commission that some ornamental/exotic house and
yard plants typically planted in residential developments may
be Caribbean Fruit Fly host plants. Such plants should be
avoided in areas near citrus groves to ensure marketability of
the citrus. In response to staff's advisory comment, the
Planning and Zoning Commission voted to add a condition of
approval that would require the developer to include in the
subdivision covenants a deed restriction on the planting of
such host plants. In addition, a prohibition of the plants
should be included in the Board's action, as was done with the
Trails End PD project. Such a prohibition will give the
county the ability to enforce the prohibition via code
enforcement action, if necessary. Therefore, the deed
restriction requirement and a prohibition are contained in
staff's recommendation at the end of this report.
14. Required Improvements: For projects in the RS -3 zoning
district, bikeway, sidewalk, and streetlight improvements may
be required pursuant to section 911.07(6) of the LDRs. For
this project:
a. A bikepath is required along the development's 4th Street
frontage by the provisions of the county's _Bikeway and
Sidewalk Plan. Although not depicted on the plan, a
bikepath must be provided by the applicant.
b. Sidewalks are not required along the development's 4th
street frontage by the provisions of the county's Bikeway
and Sidewalk Plan.
C. Internal sidewalks are not required, since the project's
overall density does not exceed 3 units per acre
(reference section 913.079(5)(b)3.b. of the LDRs).
d. Streetlighting is a required improvement which must be
provided. The applicant has agreed to provide
streetlighting in a manner which will illuminate the
project's entrance road intersection with 4th Street.
The property owners association will own and maintain all
streetlighting improvements. These streetlighting
provisions will be incorporated into the project's land
development permit.
15. Dedications: The applicant intends to dedicate subdivision
improvements, via the final plat, as follows:
a. Internal Stormwater Easements and Tracts: Private/
Property Owners Association
b. Utility Easements: Public/Indian River County
C. Street and Right -of -Way: Public/Indian River County
16. Concurrency Management: Long-range planning staff ha4
indicated that a conditional concurrency certificate will be
issued for the project prior to the Planning and Zoning
Commission consideration of this item. Thus, all concurrency
requirements related to the preliminary plat approval have
been satisfied.
DECEMBER 17, 1996 52
17. Off -Site Dedications and Improvements: The public works
department has stated that no additional right-of-way is
required from the site's 4th Street frontage. An 8' wide
bikepath is required along the site's 4th Street frontage, and
must be installed prior to issuance of a certificate of
completion for the project.
•Plan Development Special Exception:
18. Landscaping/Buffering/Lot Dimension: Compatibility standards
for a PD such as this one require a 25' wide perimeter setback
as well as perimeter buffer areas. The submitted PD
preliminary plan/plat depicts the required 25' wide setback
and appropriate buffers. The landscaping plan submitted with
the PD preliminary plat meets the landscaping requirements of
LDR Chapter 926 and the PD buffer standards of LDR section
915.16.
Note: The largest lots are proposed to be located along the
project perimeters, especially along the eastern perimeter
abutting RS -3 zoning. The smallest lots are located away from
the perimeters, internal to the project. In addition, pools
and related structures (e.g. screen enclosures) are proposed
to be set back a minimum of 25' along the perimeter rear
yards. Normal LDR provisions would allow such structures to
be located to within 10' of the perimeter.
19. Waivers and Compatibility: Through the PD process, the
applicant has requested waivers from the LDR standards. The
applicant has requested the following waivers:
1. Reduce the minimum lot size from 12,000 square feet to
9,830 square feet minimum for interior lots of the
project.
2. Reduce the minimum side yard setback from 15' to 10' for
all lots within boundaries of the project.
Through the LDRs, PD projects may be allowed waivers and
design flexibility for providing buffering, recreation areas,
pedestrian walkways, and other improvements that exceed normal
subdivision requirements. At staff's suggestion, the
applicant has agreed to provide for a pedestrian
interconnection to the adjacent RS -3 zoned property to the
east. It is staff's position that this project is compatible
with the surrounding area. In staff's opinion, this project
and the requested waivers are justified for several reasons.
First, a significant portion of the project is made up of
common lake and common recreation/open space. These areas
contribute toward the overall project's open space rather than
being distributed in small portions throughout all or most of
the project's lots.
DECEMBER 17, 1996 53 - PqL1- DO
RS -3
Internal
North
South
Fast
West Perimeter
Criteria
Lots
Perimeter
Perimeter
Perimeter
Lots
Lots
Late
Lots
Lot Width-
80t
25'
85'
90'
150.
85' - 150,
i rear
Number of
lots
108
Be
17
15
8
10
House
sideyard
15'
10'
10'
10'
10'
10'
setback
15'
10'
10'
10'
10'
10'
Through the LDRs, PD projects may be allowed waivers and
design flexibility for providing buffering, recreation areas,
pedestrian walkways, and other improvements that exceed normal
subdivision requirements. At staff's suggestion, the
applicant has agreed to provide for a pedestrian
interconnection to the adjacent RS -3 zoned property to the
east. It is staff's position that this project is compatible
with the surrounding area. In staff's opinion, this project
and the requested waivers are justified for several reasons.
First, a significant portion of the project is made up of
common lake and common recreation/open space. These areas
contribute toward the overall project's open space rather than
being distributed in small portions throughout all or most of
the project's lots.
DECEMBER 17, 1996 53 - PqL1- DO
RS -3
Internal
North
South
East
West Perimeter
Criteria
Lots
Perimeter
Perimeter
Perimeter
Lots
Lots
Lots
Lots
House: front
25'
25'
25'
25'
25'
251
i rear
setbacks
Pools:
Sides
15'
10'
10'
10'
10'
10'
Rear:
10'
10'
10•
10'
10'
30'
Lot Size
12,000 sq.
9,830 sq.
11,475 sq.
11,500 sq.
14,000 sq.
10,000 sq.
ft.
ft.+
ft.+
ft.+
ft.+
ft.+
Setback and
None
N/A
25'
25'
25'
25'
Perimeter
buffer
Type B with
24' arterial
transition
Type B with 61-
61 opaque
setback
late
opaque feature,
feature
Through the LDRs, PD projects may be allowed waivers and
design flexibility for providing buffering, recreation areas,
pedestrian walkways, and other improvements that exceed normal
subdivision requirements. At staff's suggestion, the
applicant has agreed to provide for a pedestrian
interconnection to the adjacent RS -3 zoned property to the
east. It is staff's position that this project is compatible
with the surrounding area. In staff's opinion, this project
and the requested waivers are justified for several reasons.
First, a significant portion of the project is made up of
common lake and common recreation/open space. These areas
contribute toward the overall project's open space rather than
being distributed in small portions throughout all or most of
the project's lots.
DECEMBER 17, 1996 53 - PqL1- DO
00 PAGi 61
Second, project perimeter buffering provides physical
screening and separation from adjacent properties and 4th
Street right-of-way. Such PD buffering features will provide
screening for sight and noise.
Third, lot dimensions along the perimeter of the project have
been designed to provide lots comparable to normally sized RS -
3 lots. Also, the smallest project lots are located
internally to the project away from adjacent property owners.
RECOMMENDATION:
Based upon the analysis performed, staff recommends that the Board
of County Commissioners grant the requested PD special exception
approval and corresponding request for waivers with the following
conditions:
1. That prior to the issuance of a land development permit for
the project, the applicant shall:
a. Apply for and obtain from planning staff a mining permit
exemption subject to the criteria of LDR section
934.04(7)(b).
b. Obtain approval from the county for the design of the 4th
Street eastbound left turn lane improvements at the
intersection of 4th Street and the project entrance road.
C. Depict the required 8' wide bikepath along the site's 4th
Street frontage.
2. That prior to the issuance of a certificate of completion for
Phase 2 of the project: the deceleration and turn lane
improvements at the intersection of 4th Street and the project
entrance road shall be completed, and deemed acceptable by the
public works department.
3. Caribbean Fruit Fly host plants shall be prohibited within the
Stonebridge North PD with said prohibition enforceable through
county code enforcement action. In addition, the developer
shall include in the covenants and deed restrictions filed
with the final plat a section that restricts the use of
ornamental and exotic plants that are known host plants for
insects which may infest citrus trees.
Planning Director Stan Boling reviewed the project and advised
that most of the lots exceed or are close to RS -3 requirements, 2.9
units per acre. Director Boling also noted a correction to be made
to the chart on Page 6 of the Memorandum - the lot size of the west
perimeter lots should read 1114,000" rather than 1110,000" square
feet.
Chairman Adams questioned how many minimum sized lots were
included, and Director Boling advised there were 58 internal
similarly sized lots.
The Chairman opened the public hearing and asked if anyone
wished to be heard in this matter. There being none, she closed
the public hearing.
DECEMBER 17, 1996 54
ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by
Commissioner Tippin, the Board unanimously granted
the PD special exception and preliminary plat
approval for the development to be known as
Stonebridge North, with the conditions recommended
by staff.
SECOND PUBLIC BEARING - LDR AMENDMENTS NOT RELATED TO
COMMUNICATIONS TOWERS
%, -Preto 3ournat-
COUNTY OF INDIAN RIVER: STATE OF FLORIDA
Before the undersigned authority personally appeared Darryl K
Hicks who on oath says that he is President of the Press -Journal, a
daily newspaper published at Vero Beach in Indian River County,
Florida; that
ML
M
billed to!j�] Sh9Z
was published in said newspaper in the issue(s) of
J�
Sworn to and subscribed before me this
day o
A/. Ri
A PR �a`',., President
% Sn\DRAG ['
PRESCQ.';C7ik1'P':8 ir_.
My Comm. Expires : c Stem of Florida. -MV AuSust 25. 199'7
August 25,1997 _ Co-=Isslor .''umber CC31,)6a3
No. CC310845
"tS'j• ��Q •�• Sign Cdii l/ t, �.
�y viFOFo�•. VnTan: SAM1D2i 1. PRE3C
(SEAT) T,..,.,."..a .
DECEMBER 17, 1996
55
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
NOTICE OF AMENDMENT TO LAND DEVELOPMENT
REGULATIONS (LDRS) CHANGING THE LIST OF PERMITTED
USES WITHIN THE CL ZONING DISTRICT, AND AMENDING
THE FOLLOWING CHAPTERS OF THE LAND DEVELOPMENT
REGULATIONS (LDRS): CHAPTER 911, ZONING; CHAPTER
912, SINGLE FAMILY DEVELOPMENT; CHAPTER 913,
SUBDIVISIONS AND PLATS; CHAPTER 953, FAIR SHARE
ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS; CHAPTER 954, OFF-STREET
PARKING; CHAPTER 971, REGULATIONS FOR SPECIFIC
LAND USE CRITERIA; AND PROVIDING FOR REPEAL OF
CONFLICTING PROVISIONS, CODIFICATIONS,
SEVERABILITY AND EFFECTIVE DATE.
THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY,
FLORIDA, PROPOSES TO ADOPT AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE
PERMITTED USES ALLOWED WITHIN THE CL ZONING DISTRICT. THE
PROPOSED AMENDMENT WOULD ALLOW CAR WASHES (NO REPAIRS)
AS A PERMITTED USE WITHIN THE CL DISTRICT. THIS AMENDMENT AND
SIX OTHER AMENDMENTS WILL BE CONSIDERED FOR ADOPTION, AS
FOLLOWS:
1. Allowing car washes (no repairs) in the CL (Limited Commercial)
zoning district as a permitted use (Chapter 911).
2. Restatement of special setbacks for utility sheds (Chapter 912).
3. Modifications to extend land development permit and prelimi nary
plat approval time frames (Chapter 913).
4. Referencing "fueling position" rather than "pump" regarding the
traffic impact fee category for gasoline sales (Chapter 953).
5. Minor revisions/update of handicap parking requirements
(Chapter 954).
6. Clarification of concurrency criterion for accessory dwelling units
(Chapter 971).
7. Codification of the adopted Wabosso Corridor Plan devel opment
requirements (Chapter 911).
A PUBLIC HEARING ON THE ORDINANCE AMENDING USES WITHIN
THE CL ZONING DISTRICT, AND THE OTHER DESCRIBED AMENDMENTS,
WILL BE HELD ON WEDNESDAY, DECEMBER 4, 1996 AT 5:01 P.M. AND
ON TUESDAY, DECEMBER 17, 1996 AT 9:05 A.M. AT THE BOARD OF
COUNTY COMMISSIONERS CHAMBERS, 1840 25TH STREET, VERO
BEACH, FLORIDA. A COPY OF THE PROPOSED ORDINANCE WILL BE
AVAILABLE FOR THE PUBLIC BEGINNING NOVEMBER 26, 1996 IN THE
OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
IN THE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION BUILDING LOCATED AT 1840 25TH
STREET, VERO BEACH, FLORIDA. CITIZENS SHALL HAVE AN
OPPORTUNITY TO BE HEARD AT THE PUBLIC HEARINGS.
THE PROPOSED ORDINANCE, IF ADOPTED, WOULD BE EFFECTIVE IN
THE UNINCORPORATED AREA OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, AS DEPICTED
ON THE LOCATION MAP SHOWN BELOW.
Please direct planning -related questions to the current development
planning section at 567-8000, ext. 242.
Anyone who may wish to appeal any decision which may be made at
this meeting will need to ensure that a verbatim record of the
proceedings is made, which includes testimony and evidence upon
which the appeal is based.
ANYONE WHO NEEDS A SPECIAL ACCOMMODATION FOR THIS
MEETING MUST CONTACT THE COUNTY'S AMERICANS WITH
DISABILITIES ACT (ADA) COORDINATOR AT 567-8000 X223 AT LEAST
48 HOURS IN ADVANCE OF THE MEETING.
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
BY -s- Fran B. Adams, Chairman
PAG,
A
h
INO..M "IVE" COYNT •- —co"Eo".TED
."E.
Please direct planning -related questions to the current development
planning section at 567-8000, ext. 242.
Anyone who may wish to appeal any decision which may be made at
this meeting will need to ensure that a verbatim record of the
proceedings is made, which includes testimony and evidence upon
which the appeal is based.
ANYONE WHO NEEDS A SPECIAL ACCOMMODATION FOR THIS
MEETING MUST CONTACT THE COUNTY'S AMERICANS WITH
DISABILITIES ACT (ADA) COORDINATOR AT 567-8000 X223 AT LEAST
48 HOURS IN ADVANCE OF THE MEETING.
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
BY -s- Fran B. Adams, Chairman
PAG,
A
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of December 10, 1996:
TO: James E. Chandler
County Administrator
D ION HEAD CONCURRENCE:
obert M. Keating, AICP,�
Community Develop m nt EU&ector
4 r.
FROM: Stan Boling, AICP
Planning Director
DATE: December 10, 1996
SUBJECT: Second Hearing for LDR Amendments Not Related to
Communications Towers
It is requested that the data herein presented be given formal
consideration by the Board of County Commissioners at its regular
meeting of December 17, 1996.
BACKGROUND:
At its special hearing of December 4, 1996, the Board of County
Commissioners reviewed and considered a draft ordinance covering
the following topics:
1. Modifications to extend land development permit and
preliminary plat approval timeframes.
2. Restatement of special setbacks for utility sheds.
3. Minor revisions/update of handicap parking requirements.
4. Clarification of concurrency criterion for accessory dwelling
units-.-
5.
nits.5. Referencing "fueling position" rather than "pump" regarding
the traffic impact fee category for gasoline sales.
6. Allowing car washes in the CL (Limited Commercial) zoning
district as a permitted use.
7. Codification of the adopted Wabasso Corridor Plan development
requirements.
At that hearing, after discussion, the Board found the draft
ordinance to be acceptable and announced its intention to take
final action on the proposed ordinance at its December 17, 1996
meeting. The Board now needs to take final action.
ANALYSIS:
As stated by staff at the December 4th hearing, each graphic
(figure) associated with the Wabasso Corridor Plan codification has
been labeled for convenience and easy reference. Staff has
prepared the ordinance in final form, and it is ready for adoption.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners adopt the
attached ordinance amending the county LDRs (land development
regulations).
Planning Director Stan Boling advised that no changes were
made subsequent to the special hearing of December 4, 1996 and the
ordinance is now in final form. —
DECEMBER 17, 1996 56
P
The Chairman opened the public hearing and asked if anyone
wished to be heard in this matter. There being none, she closed
the public hearing.
Commissioner Eggert directed staff to capitalize "Board of
County Commissioners" and "Planning and Zoning Commission" wherever
they appear in the documentation.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by
Commissioner Tippin, the Board unanimously adopted
Ordinance 96-24 amending the Land Development
Regulations (LDRs), changing the list of permitted
uses within the CL Zoning District, and amending the
following Chapters of the Land Development
Regulations (LDRS): Chapter 911, Zoning; Chapter
912, Single Family Development; Chapter 913,
Subdivisions and Plat; Chapter 953, Fair Share
Roadway Improvements; Chapter 954, Off -Street
Parking; Chapter 971, Regulations for Specific -Land
Use Criteria; and providing for repeal of
conflicting provisions, codifications, severability
and effective date.
ORDINANCE NO. 96- 24
AN ORDINANCE OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA AMENDING THE
LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS (LDRS) CHANGING THE LIST OF
PERMITTED USES WITHIN THE CL ZONING DISTRICT, AND
AMENDING THE FOLLOWING CHAPTERS OF THE LAND DEVELOPMENT
REGULATIONS (LDRS): CHAPTER 911, ZONING; CHAPTER 912,
SINGLE FAMILY DEVELOPMENT; CHAPTER 913, SUBDIVISIONS AND
PLATS; CHAPTER 953, FAIR SHARE ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS;
CHAPTER 954, OFF-STREET PARKING; CHAPTER 971, REGULATIONS
FOR SPECIFIC LAND USE CRITERIA; AND PROVIDING FOR REPEAL
OF CONFLICTING PROVISIONS, CODIFICATIONS, SEVERABILITY
AND EFFECTIVE DATE.
BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of County Commissioners of Indian
River County, Florida that the Indian River County land development
regulations (LDRS) be amended as follows:
1. MODIFICATIONS TO EXTEND LAND DEVELOPMENT PERMIT AND
PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL TIMEFRAMES:
a. Land Development Permits
(J)
Section 913.07(5)(J) of the subdivision ordinance is
hereby amended as follows:
DECEMBER 17, 1996 57 PA,. P.� 64
65
ORDINANCE NO. 96- 24
Preliminary plat with which the permit is associated,
whichever is less. During the period of time that the
permit is valid, construction of subdivision improvements
may occur in accordance with the issued permit, subject
to the developer maintaining valid jurisdictional agency
and department permits required for various activities
(e.g. utility permits).
If the initial land development permit (or a subsequent
land development permit) expires and further construction
of 'subdivision improvements is necessary—' then the
developer shall either:
1. Apply for and obtain a new land development permit,
or
2. Apply to the public works director or his designee
=or an extension of the land development permit.
Said extension request may be granted by the public
works director or his designee for a specified
period of time if:
A. The request is submitted in writing prior to
expiration of the permit, and
b. Staff determines that no substantial re -design
of the project would be necessary if a new
permit were to be applied for and obtained
b. Preliminary Plat Approvals
Section 913.07(4)(J) & (K) of the subdivision ordinance
is hereby amended as follows:
(J) Time limit.
1. The preliminary plat approval shall be valid for a
period of • ._M five (5) years from
the date it is approved by the Planning and Zoning
Commission or, if appealed, when approved by the
Board of County Commissioners. ..
(K)
2. Notwithstanding these limitations, an applicant may
intentionally phase a project (multiple phases)
with specific development timeframes that are
approved as part of the preliminary plat
application request. Development phasing may not
cover a period exceeding twenty (20) years.
Preliminary plat approval for a multi -phased
project may exceed the five (5) year time limit
referenced above if the first phase of the project
is constructed, and inspected by the county and
verified as complete within five 5 ears from the
date of preliminary plat approval.• -� •
Preiiminary plat approval will lapse if the
approved phase timeframes are exceeded, unless
extended by the Planning and Zoning Commission as
provided for in section 911.07(4)(k), below.
Modifications to Extend Approved Schedules for Multi -
Phased Projects. Modifications to extend approved
schedules for multi -phased projects may be approved by
the Planning and Zoninq Commission if the Planning and
DECEMBER 17, 1996 58
s �
ORDINANCE NO. 96- 24
Zoning Commission
that no substantial re-
neces
rPouiations in effect at the time of the extension
extens
schedule hp modified so as to cover a period of more than
2. RESTATEMENT OF UTILITY SHED SETBACK:
Section 912.07(b)6.j. of the single family ordinance is hereby
amended to read as follows:
j. Utility buildings. Utility buildings or sheds of one
hundred (100) square feet or less may be located within
a required side or rear yard, provided a minimum of five
(5) feet is maintained from the side or rear property
line and the utility building or shed is clear of all
easements. Only one such utility building or shed may be
allowed to encroach into a required yard on a single lot
or parcel of land. A utility building or shed (one
hundred (100) square feet or less) that is to be located
to within five (5) feet of a side or rear property line
shall be located no closer than ten (10) feet to the
principal structure and shall not exceed the height of
the principal structure. (Refer to Chapter 917
regulations for accessory storage buildinas.l
3. MEDICAL HANDICAP PARKING
Section 954.05(36) of the off-street parking ordinance is
hereby amended to read as follows:
(36) Medical and dental offices and outpatient clinics.
General requirement of one (1) space per one hundred and
seventy-five (175) square feet of gross floor area.
FAG
DECEMBER 17, 1996 59 ��
�
4.
5.
6.
PAG,67
ORDINANCE NO. 96- 24
ACCESSORY DWELLING UNIT CONCURRENCY CRITERION
Section 971.41(10)(e)12. of the specific land use criteria
ordinance is hereby amended to read as follows:
12.
"FUELING POSITION" LDR CHANGES
The "Gas Stations" category wording in the fee schedule table
at the end of Chapter 953, Fairshare Roadway Improvements, is
amended to read as follows:
Type of Land Development Activity
Gas Stations (per = fuelingpositions) ....
[Editor's Note: no changes to TIF rates are proposed]
ALLOWING CARWASHES IN THE CL DISTRICT
Amend a portion of the section 911.10(4) use table, as
follows:
DECEMBER 17, 1996
60
L_J
PRO
OCR
MED
CN
CL
CG
CH
Automotive Dealers and
Services
New and used cars
-
-
-
_
_
P
P
dealers
Used vehicle sales
-
-
-
-
-
S
A
Auto and home
-
-
_
_
p
P
P
supply stores
Gasoline service
-
-
-
-
A
P
P
stations
Boat sales and
-
-
-
-
-
A
P
rentals
Recreational
-
-
vehicle sales
-
-
-
A
A
Motorcycle dealers
-
-
-
_
_
P
P
Automotive fuel
A
P
P
-
-
-
A
sales
Commercial marina
-
-
-
_
_
A
P
Marine repair and
-
-
-
-
-
A
P
service
DECEMBER 17, 1996
60
L_J
ORDINANCE NO. 96-24
P = Permitted Use,
A = Administrative Permit Use,
S = Special Exception Use
7. WABASSO CORRIDOR PLAN LDR
Chapter -911 of the zoning ordinance is hereby amended to
establish section 911.18, as follows:
Section 911.18 Wabasso Corridor Regulations
Purpose and Intent
The overall purpose and intent of these regulations is to:
J�.j Preserve and enhance the appearance of the Wabasso
Corridor
Jbi Recognize and enhance the character of the Wabasso
community
icl Increase property values in the Wabasso corridor
u Prevent the establishment of incompatible land uses and
unattractive developments in the corridor
Make the Wabasso Corridor area consistent with the
following vision statement:
Wabasso will retain the feeling of an uncluttered, well
maintained small town. Through attractive landscanine
--- •_�` ..,.W a.a,.uiai LjrauL ana scenic
vistas that give Wabasso its special character.
Additionally, this area will be characterized by safe
uncongested roads and by a mix of uses including large
and small businesses and a variety of residential
options.
Boundaries of the Wabasso Corridor
The boundaries of the Wabasso Corridor are as shown on the
county's official zoning atlas. Generaliv_ r_r,a t,.,,,,,.a-4ee _.._
��i=cam �•• »ui ozreet ana giong CR 510
from 66th Avenue to the Atlantic Ocean.
-L3 I Specific Development Regulations Within the Wabasso Corridor
In the Wabasso Corridor, the following special regulations
shall apply to new non-residential development that requires
major site plan ap roval
DECEMBER 17, 1996 61 FAQ„ Fjf
PRO
OCR
MED
CN
CL
CG
CH
Auto Repair, Services
and Parkin
Automotive rentals
-
-
-
-
-
P
P
Automobile parking
-
-
-
-
-
P
P
and storage
Body and paint
-
-
-
-
-
-
P
shops
General automotive
-
-
-
-
-
P
P
repair
Carwashes no
-
-
-
-
P
P
P
repairs
Automotive fluid
-
-
-
-
A
A
P
sales and services
(other than
gasoline)
P = Permitted Use,
A = Administrative Permit Use,
S = Special Exception Use
7. WABASSO CORRIDOR PLAN LDR
Chapter -911 of the zoning ordinance is hereby amended to
establish section 911.18, as follows:
Section 911.18 Wabasso Corridor Regulations
Purpose and Intent
The overall purpose and intent of these regulations is to:
J�.j Preserve and enhance the appearance of the Wabasso
Corridor
Jbi Recognize and enhance the character of the Wabasso
community
icl Increase property values in the Wabasso corridor
u Prevent the establishment of incompatible land uses and
unattractive developments in the corridor
Make the Wabasso Corridor area consistent with the
following vision statement:
Wabasso will retain the feeling of an uncluttered, well
maintained small town. Through attractive landscanine
--- •_�` ..,.W a.a,.uiai LjrauL ana scenic
vistas that give Wabasso its special character.
Additionally, this area will be characterized by safe
uncongested roads and by a mix of uses including large
and small businesses and a variety of residential
options.
Boundaries of the Wabasso Corridor
The boundaries of the Wabasso Corridor are as shown on the
county's official zoning atlas. Generaliv_ r_r,a t,.,,,,,.a-4ee _.._
��i=cam �•• »ui ozreet ana giong CR 510
from 66th Avenue to the Atlantic Ocean.
-L3 I Specific Development Regulations Within the Wabasso Corridor
In the Wabasso Corridor, the following special regulations
shall apply to new non-residential development that requires
major site plan ap roval
DECEMBER 17, 1996 61 FAQ„ Fjf
-U P Fac. 6 9
ORDINANCE NO. 96- 24
jai Prohibited Uses: The following land uses shall be
prohibited:
1. Outdoor display of automobiles/motorized vehicles
for sale or rental;
2. Outdoor display of mobile homes for sale or rental;
5. Outdoor display of boats for sale or rental;
4. Drive-in theaters;
5. Recycling centers;
6. Transmission towers;
7. Flea
markets;
8. Transient merchant uses: and
5. Temporary sales events that require temporary use
permits and are conducted outside of enclosed
buildings.
Specifically, there shall be no outside display of merchandise
on public sidewalks (within public rights-of-way or easements)
or rights-of-way. Outside display of merchandise shall be
allowed on private property; provided, however, that outside
display of merchandise is allowed only on sidewalks abutting
buildings occupied by the business displaying the merchandise
All other uses shall comply with applicable zoning district
regulations.
Restricted Uses: Within the plan area, vehicle
bays or stalls such as those associated with
vehicle repair and car wash uses are allowed IF
such bays or stalls are oriented and screened from
view of US 1 and CR 510.
Free-standing on-site signs: Within the plan area,
free-standing, on-site signs shall be limited to a
maximum height of 10' above the parking lot grade
and shall be ground mounted (monument style) or may
be supported by a ole(s) if, at the time of
certificate of occupancy (C.O.) issuance, such
supports are completely screened from view by
berming and/or landscaping. Said berming and/or
landscaping shall cover the entire area underneath
the siqn. A 1' setback from the right-of-way line
is required for free-standing on-site signs. Also,
free-standing on-site signs for non-residential
complexes (such as shopping centers) shall be
limited to an area of 120 square feet for sites
between 5 and 20 acres in size, and 160 square feet
for sites more than 20 acres in size. All other
countywide sign regulations of LDR Chapter 956
shall apply.
(See Figure F-1 at End of Section 911.18),
Roofs: All buildings and accessory structures within the
plan area shall have sloped roofs (slope pitch at least
4:12) visible from every direction, unless a visible flat
roof, parapet roof, or other such roof design is
determined by the community development director or his
designee to be an integral feature of a recognized
architectural style. All buildings and accessory
structures may have flat roof systems where flat roof
areas are not visible at 6' above grade from all
directions.
(See Figures F-2 & F-3 at End of Section 911.18)
(e) Colors: Colors of buildings and accessory structures
within the plan area shall be earth -tones or pastels
The selection of earth -tones shall include the following
colors:
1. Any tint or tone of brown, including beige, tan,
ocher and olive.
2. Any tone of green, having a minimum black content
of six (6) percent.
DECEMBER 17, 1996 62
ORDINANCE NO. 96- 24
3. Any tone of orange (warm red and yellow base),
having a minimum black content of three (3)
percent.
4. Any warm or cold shade of gray.
5. Any tone of yellow, having a minimum black content
of five (5) percent.
6. Any tone of warm red, having a minimum black
content of five ( 5 ) percent and a minimum of red
content of forty-five (45) percent
7. White.
Earth tones shall not include any metallic colors
The selection of pastels shall be limited to those colors
having a minimum white content of 90%Other colors,
excluding flourescents, may be permitted as accent
colors, not to exceed 20% of the surface area of any one
elevation. Where other colors are used in a facade sign,
the area of the facade sign shall be included in the 20%
limitation on the accent color surface area.
The requirement for earth -tones and pastels shall not
apply to colors commonly found in natural materials such
as brick or stone unless such material has been
artificially colored in a manner which would be contrary
to the intent of these regulations
jfj Special screening: Within the plan area, mechanical
equipment (ground, building, and roof mounted) including
air conditioning units, pumps, meters, walk-in coolers,
and similar equipment shall be visually screened from
surrounding properties and roadways using architectural
features, fencing, walls, or landscaping.
Provided with a solid wall at least 8' in height above
the loading area grade to buffer adjacent roadways and
residentially designated sites from noises and sights
associated with docks.
Man-made opaque screens which are visible from any public
or private right-of-way or street, or any residentially
designated area, shall be constructed of a material which
is architecturally similar in design color and finish to
the principal structure.
igl US 1 and CR 510 Landscape Buffer: Within the plan area
the following landscape requirements shall apply:
The county -wide landscaping requirements of LDR Chapter
926 shall apply except as noted herein The following
landscape buffer shall be provided along the entire
length of a site's CR 510 and US 1 frontages, except for
approved driveways:
Minimum Planting/Berm
Buffer Width Requirements per 100'
4 canopy trees
5 understory trees
20' or more Continuous hedge*: 111-21'
high at planting
Berm: W-31 high*
4.5 canopy trees
5.5 understory trees
15' Continuous hedge*: W-31
high at planting
Berm: 11-2V high*
DECEMBER 17, 1996 63 FAGS
L-
ORDINANCE NO. 96- 24
5 canopy trees
6 understory trees
10' Continuous hedge*: 22'-3'
high at planting
Berm: 1'-1$' high*
*NOTE: The intent of the hedge and berm combination is
to provide a visual screen 4' high above the grade of the
project site parking area. Therefore, at the time of a
certificate of occupancy (CO) for the project site, the
combination of berming and hedging shall provide a 4'
visual screen. Undulations in the berm and corresponding
hedge height are encouraged.
To provide a less formal appearance, clustering trees
along the buffer strip is encouraged and uniform spacing
of trees is discouraged except where used to emphasize
a particular planting theme or development style.
(See Figures F-4 & F-5 at End of Section 911.18)
jhl
Landscape Buffer Along Other Streets in the Corridor• In
addition to standard Chapter 926 requirements for
landscaping between rights-of-way and parking areas, such
landscape strips within the corridor must also contain 2
understory trees for every 30 lineal feet of the required
landscape strip.
,til
Landscape Buffer Along Commercial/Residential Border•
Within the corridor, where compatibility buffer yards are
required by Chapter 911 regulations 2 additional
--understory trees per 30 -lineal feet of required buffer
strip shall be provided.
Foundation Plantings: Along the front and side faces of
buildings that are adjacent to US 1, CR 510, or local
road rights-of-way, foundation plantings shall be
Provided and maintained in landscape strips having a
minimum width of 51, measured perpendicular to the
building face. Forty percent (40%) of the foundation
perimeter (excluding entranceways and overhead doors)
along the building's front and sides shall be planted
with shrubs and/or flowers. For example, if a building
has front and side perimeters that measure 100'
(excluding entranceways and overhead doors), then 40% of
the building's perimeter must have a 5' wide foundation
planting landscape strip located along the front and
sides of the building.
One (1) understory tree shall be provided for every 25
lineal feet of the required foundation planting strip
The planting strip shall be planted with the required
understory trees plus at least 2 shrubs and/or flowering
plants for every 10 square feet of required strip area
Foundation plantings shall be located between the
building face and the adjacent roadwav and any
intervening parking area Understory trees may be
clustered.
(See Figure F-6 at End of Section 918.18)
(k)
Landscape Planting Theme Requirements• All property
adjacent to US 1 and CR 510 within the corridor has been
placed into one of four landscaping theme categories
Within each theme category, required landscape plantings
shall be limited to certain species, as speci-fied below,
with the exception that sod, annuals or hardscape may be
used in groundcover areas
DECEMBER
17, 1996
64
2.
ORDINANCE NO. 96- 24
Formal Palm Theme: CR 510 between Massey Road and
the eastern foot of the bridge
Street Tree: (Canopy, Min. 8' Clear Trunk)
Washingtonia robusta Washington Palm
Supporting Shade Tree: (Canopy, Min. 12'-14'
Height. x 6' Spread)
Quercus virginiana
Live Oak
Accent Trees: (Understory, Min. 8' Height x 4'-6'
Spread)
Ligustrum lucidum
Nerium oleander
Myrica cerifera
Shrubs: (Min. 24" Height)
Nerium oleander
Myrica cerifera
Ligustrum lucidum
Viburnum suspensum
Coccoloba uvifera
Livistona chinensis
Tree Ligustrum
Oleander Tree
Wax Myrtle
Oleander
Wax Myrtle
Ligustrum
Sandankwa Viburnum
Seagrape
Chinese Fan Palm
Groundcover: (Min. 10"-12" Heiaht
Raphiolepis indica
Indian Hawthorn
Ilex vomitoria
Yaupon Holly
Liriope muscari
Evergreen Giant
"Evergreen Giant".
Liriope
Pittosporum tobira
Variegated
"variegata"
Pittosporum
Pittosporum tobira
Green Pittosporu
Ixora "Nora Grant"
Nora Grant Ixora
Carissa grandiflora
Natal Plum
Informal Palm Theme: SR AIA/CR 510 intersection
west to the eastern foot of the bridge
Street Trees: (Canopy, 10'-16' Clear Trunk)
Washingtonia robusta Washinqton Palm
Sabal palmetto Cabbage Palm
Supporting Shade Tree: (Canopy, 12'-14' Height)
Quercus virginiana
Live Oak
Accent Trees: (Understory, Min. 8' Height x 4'-6'
Spread)
Nerium oleander
Myrica cerifera
Ligustrum lucidum
Shrubs: (Min. 24" Height)
Scaevola
Nerium oleander
Elaeagnus
Myrica cerifera
Liqustrum lucidum
Viburnum suspensum
Tripsacum dactyloides
Coccoloba uvifera
Oleander Tree
Wax Myrtle
Tree Ligustrum
Inkberry
Oleander
Silverthorn
Wax Myrtle
Liqustrum
Sandankwa Viburnum
Fakahatchee Grass
Seagrape
Groundcover: (Min. 10"-12" Heiaht
Lantana
Lantana
Liriope muscari
Evergreen Giant
"Evergreen Giant"
Liriope
Carissa grandiflora
Natal Plum
Pittosporum tobira
Variegated
"variegata"
Pittosporum
Ilex vomitoria
Yaupon Holly
Raphiolepis indica
Indian Hawthorn
DECEMBER 17, 1996 65
PAS ��
3.
4.
ORDINANCE NO. 96-24
Theme: US 1 f rom 84
Ra
4, PAC11, r7
Street Trees: (Canopy, Min.14' Height x 6'-7'
Spread 21"-3" Cal.)
Quercus laurifolia
Quercus virginiana
Laurel Oak
Live Oak
Accent Trees: (Understory, Min. 8' Height x 4'-6'
Spread)
Lagerstroemia indica Crape Myrtle
Myrica cerifera Wax Myrtle
Ligustrum lucidum Tree Ligustrum
Ilex attenuata "East Palatka" East Palatka Holly
Nerium oleander Oleander Tree
Shrubs: (Min. 24" Height)
Viburnum suspensum
Ligustrum lucidum
Viburnum odoratissimum
Myrica cerifera
Sandankwa Viburnum
Ligustrum
Sweet Viburnum
Wax Myrtle
Groundcover: (Min. 10"-12" Height)
Raphiolepis indica
Ilex vomitoria
Liriope muscari
"Evergreen Giant"
Hemerocallis spp.
Juniper chinensis "parsonii"
Hymenocallis latifolia
Ixora "Nora Grant"
ro
Indian Hawthorn
Yaupon Holly
Evergreen Giant
Liriope
Daylily
Parson's Juniper
Spider Lily
Ixora Nora Grant
Theme: CR 510 wes
Street Trees: (Canopy, 10'-16' Height)
Pinus elliottii Slash Pine
- Quercus virginiana Live Oak -
Quercus laurifolia Laurel Oak
Sabal palmetto Cabbage Palm
Accent Trees: (Understory, Min. 8' Height x 4'-6'
Spread)
Ilex cassine Dahoon Holly
Myrica cerifera Wax Myrtle
Ligustrum lucidum Tree Ligustrum
Lagerstroemia indica Crape Myrtle
Ilex attenuata "East Palatka" East Palatka Holly
Shrubs: (Min. 24" Height)
Crinum spp.
Elaeagnus pungens
Syzygium Paniculata
"myrtifolia"
Livistona chinensis
Myrica cerifera
Philodendron selloum
Viburnum odoratissimun
Viburnum suspensum
DECEMBER 17, 1996
66
Crinum Lily
Silverthorn
Eugenia myrtifolia
Chinese Fan Palm
Wax Myrtle
Philodendron
Sweet Viburnum
Sandankwa Viburnum
r
ORDINANCE NO. 96- 24
Groundcover: (Min. 10"-12" Height)
Nephrolepis Swordfern
Liriope muscari Evergreen Giant
"Evergreen Giant" Liriope
Hymenocallis Latifolia Spider Lily
Pittosporum tobira Variegated
"Variegata" Pittosporum
Lantana Lantana
Juniperus chinensis Parson's juniper
"parsonii"
Dietes vegeta African Iris
Review of Development Projects by Wabasso Task Force
Members
Kembers of the Wabasso Corridor Task Force are authorized
to review and comment on development project proposals
within the Wabasso Corridor. Task Force members will be
notified by planning staff regarding pre -application
conferences and TRC meetings at which proposals for
development within the corridor are reviewed and
commented upon.
Staff and Wabasso Corridor Task Force members will work
with applicants to ensure that every effort is made to
save protected trees. No protected trees shall be
removed unless it is absolutely necessary to accommodate
a proposed site plan. In addition staff and task force
members will encourage developers to follow the voluntary
architectural guidelines found in the Wabasso Corridor
Plan.
Special Regulations for Minor Site Plan Projects
In the Wabasso Corridor Plan area, non-residential
development and re -development that requires minor site
plan approval shall comply with the previously described
special regulations for new major development, WITHIN THE
MINOR SITE PLAN PROJECT'S AREA OF DEVELOPMENT/
REDEVELOPMENT. Theproject's area of
development/redevelopment is the area of the site
containing buildings, additions structures, facilities
or improvements proposed by the applicant or required to
serve those items proposed by the applicant. As an
example, a small building addition that requires
additional parking spaces would result in a project area
of development/redevelopment that includes the addition
AND the parking lot addition and adjacent required
Nonconformities
Within the Wabasso Corridor Plan area, legally
established existing development and uses that existed
prior to November 21, 1995 that do not comply with these
special regulations are grandfathered -in under the
countywide nonconformities regulations of LDR Chapter
904. All nonconforming uses and structures are governed
by the LDR Chapter 904 regulations.
Variances
(a) Variances from these special corridor regulations
shall be processed pursuant to the procedures and
timeframes of Section 70.001, Florida Statutes
The Planning and Zoning Commission shall recommend
variances to the Board of County Commissioners for
final action.
The Planning and Zoning Commission is authorized to
propose settlements of claims under Chapter 70,
Florida Statutes, through any means set out in
Section 70.001(4)(c).
FAQ:- �
DECEMBER 17, 1996 6
w� PAC,:-
ORDINANCE
al, ORDINANCE NO. 96- 24
c) Criteria. The Planning and Zoning Commission shall
not approve a variance or other proposal for relief
unless it finds the following:
1. The corridor regulation directly restricts or
limits the use of real property such that the
Droperty owner is permanently unable to attain
for the existing use of the real property or a
vested right to a specific use of the real
property with respect to the real property as
a whole; or
2. That the Droverty owner is left with existin
or vested uses that are unreasonable such that
the property owner bears permanently a
disproportionate share of a burden imposed for
the good of the public, which in fairness
should be borne by the public at large; and
3. The relief granted protects the public
interest served by the regulations at issue
and is the appropriate relief necessary to
prevent the corridor regulations from
inordinately burdening the real property.
Voluntary Guidelines
(aZ
tial subdiv
The f
are esi
tectural
t o
ing area
.andscape
.0.
[idelines
vate and
Wabasso
Corridor as a cohesive, functional and aesthetic
whole. The guidelines contain standards addressing
components of the physical development of
structures in the corridor. Based upon location,
historv. environmental attributes, historic
resources and character, these guidelines ref
an architectural theme using elements f
throughout Florida's past, referred to as
Florida" style.
1. General Criteria
Besides defining the communitv's low densit
low rise character, building heights should
relate to open spaces to allow sufficient
light and ventilation, effective use of
prevailing winds for cooling, enhancement of
views and minimizing the obstruction of views
to adjoining structures and other locations.
Buildings should be designed to lessen the
appearance of excessive bulk. Ostentatious or
overly -prominent building shapes that are out
of harmony in context with their visual
environment, including adjacent structures and
the landscaped framework, are discouraged.
The surfaces of enclosing walls of large-scale
commercial structures should incorporate
elements relating to the scale of pedestrian
movement and view. Vertical enclosing walls
should be sub -divided into clearly visible
bays, each a minimum of 60 feet in width.
The use of the following devices for
establishing scale is encouraged:
a. Textured surfaces;
S-7 Scored joints;
C. Surface articulation or subdivision of
vertical surfaces into distinct areas; -
d. Rhythmic use of openings (doors, windows,
etc.
DECEMBER 17, 1996 68
r
ORDINANCE NO. 96-24
e. Scale and proportion of facade;
f. Use of signage to establish scale and
proportion;
_q. Installation of landscape elements in
front of walls to break up long wall
expanses and sloped or otherwise
articulated roof lines to develop visual
interest at the roof level.
2. Specific Criteria
a. Roofs: The use of vernacular materials
such as standing seam metal or wood shake
shingles is encouraged. Roof pitch
should range from 8:12 to 12:12 for
primary roofs, and lower pitch for
arcades or overhangs.
b. Doors/Windows: Doors and windows should
be symmetrical in placement, and should
be true divided lite. Casing trim should
be 4"-6" and workable shutters sized to
fit windows are encouraged.
c. Siding: Siding should be wood horizontal
or vertical boards or shake.
d._ Porches/Arcades: The use of wide
overhangs which create porch or arcade -
like features is strongly encouraged.
For instance. commercial buildings should
minimum or LUI wide. This width
accommodates 2-3 abreast pedestrian
traffic while allowing for entrance door
swing area. Awnings are also encouraged
to add color and textural interest to
buildings.
e. Cornice Detailing: Open exposed rafter
tails are encouraged.
f. Lighting: The use of thematic lot
lighting and signage is encouraged.
[Editor's Note: graphics to be inserted at end of section 911.18
follow immediately after this page.]
Coding: Words in . - : type are deletions from existing law.
Words underlined are additions.
DECEMBER 17, 1996
69
PAL
ORDINANCE NO. 96-24
"F-1: FREE-STANDING SIGNS"
S�r �
G4SF 1'YF'IG.4L
v SASE
s ,
LKeN�IMENt SlroN
8� .ryr.
DECEMBER 17, 1996 70
'i
MWC(KW 946(1 (Alit BUD Va
IICENTERII
0
No4{IBITw S46N
Pon
"77
ORDINANCE NO. 96-24
nc 01. Dr1/ILCM
SIDE VIEW
tilm N PLAT 4th C�l(oir
J
Ff oNT \o QQ
F"o"r VIEW
DECEMBER 17, 1996 71 ° a 0 PAC
.-70
ORDINANCE NO. 96-24
"F-3: ROOFS"
ANd
'YES` (Aaw-4
DECEMBER 17, 1996 72
0
r
ORDINANCE NO. 96-24
"F-4: U.S.1 & C.R.510 BUFFER"
too`
--I I 7 \ q..VOY`/� 1 ri
c V x
x
A
DECEMBER 17, 1996 73
i
ORDINANCE NO. 96-24
"F-5: U.S.1 & C.R.510 BUFFER"
s
I Yi- V)ilc,A Bug
1'- 2Ys F416l�
DECEMBER 17, 1996 74
ORDINANCE NO. 96-24
"F-6: FOUNDATION PLANTINGS"
OPMOV141 i�(L uNn�s�ro�Y t�
DECEMBER 17, 1996 75
ORDINANCE NO. 96- 9a
8. REPEAL OF CONFLICTING PROVISIONS
All previous ordinances, resolutions, or motions of the Board
of County Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida which
conflict with the provisions of this ordinance are hereby repealed
to the extent of such conflict. All Special Acts of the
legislature applying only to the unincorporated portion of Indian
River County and which conflict with the provisions of this
ordinance are hereby repealed to the extent of such conflict.
9. CODIFICATION
The provisions of this ordinance shall be incorporated into
the County Code and the word "Ordinance" may be changed to
"section", "article", or other appropriate word, and the sections
of this ordinance may be renumbered or relettered to accomplish
such intentions.
10. SEVERABILITY
If any section, part of a sentence, paragraph, phrase or word
of this ordinance is for any reason held to be unconstitutional,
inoperative or void, such holdings shall not affect the remaining
portions hereof and it shall be construed to have been the
legislative intent to pass this ordinance without such
unconstitutional, invalid or inoperative part.
11. EFFECTIVE DATE
The provisions of this ordinance shall become effective upon
filing with the Department of State.
Approved and adopted by the Board of County Commissioners of
Indian River County, Florida on this 17 day of December ,
1996.
This ordinance was advertised --in the Vero Beach Press -Journal on
the 22 day of November , 1996, and on the 1 () day of
December , 1996, for public hearings to be held on the 4
day of December , 1996, and on the 17 day of
December , 1996 at which time at the final hearing it was
moved for adoption by Commissioner _ Eoaert , seconded
by Commissioner Tiooin , and adopted by the
following vote;
Chairman Fran B. Adams Ave
Vice Chairman Carolyn K. Eggert Ave
Commissioner John W. Tippin Aye
Commissioner Caroline D. Ginn Aye
Commissioner Kenneth R. Macht Aye
DECEMBER 17, 1996
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
BY �a�
Fran B. Adams, Chairman
76
i
ORDINANCE NO. 96- 24
ATTEST BY:
Jef K. Bart lerk
Acknowledgement by the Department of State o the State of Flor d
this day of , 1996.
Effective Date: Filed with the Department of State on the
day of , 1996.
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM
William G. Collins II
Deputy County Attorney
APPROVED AS TO PLANNING MATTERS
Robert M. Keatin AI
CP
Community Development/ irector
u\c\6\1dr\1296.0rd
Coding: Words in .. '. . type are deletions from existing law.
Words underlined are additions.
` F.ti;a
DECEMBER 17, 1996 77
FAC i.
PUBLIC HEARING - INDIAN RIVER COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE
PLAN EVALUATION AND APPRAISAL REPORT
PRESS -JOURNAL
Published Daily
Vero Beach, Indian River County, Florida
COUNTY OF INDIAN RIVER: STATE OF FLORIDA
Before the undersigned authority personally appeared Darryl K. Hicks who on
oath says that he is President of the Press -Journal, a daily newspaper published at Vero Beach
In
Irxfian River County, Florida; that the attached copy of advertisement, being
in the matter of
In the Court, was twb-
fished in said newspaper in the issues ofyi
Affiant further says that the said Press-Joumal Is a newspaper published at Vero Beach, in
said Indian River County, Florida, and that the said newspaper has heretofore been
continuously published in said Indian River County, Florida, each daily and has been entered as
second class mail math at the post Office In Vero Beach, In said Indian River County, Florida,
for a period of one year next preceding the first publication of the attached copy of
advertisement; and affiant further says that he has reicher paid nor promised any person, firm
or corporation any discount, rebate, commission or refund for the purpose of securing this
advertisement for publication in said newspaper.
PdaNUHr P' p�y"a
P�4
ONbefore me da Of
� tt1is--L= y� �_11.D.
,��P••• l�ti moi./ Ift• i
i
My Comm. Expires : _ (Presdent)
_ August 25, 1997 sSArDRAA. PRESCoTT. YOTARYPGBUC,
a Staff of Sort& rk Comm sston Eq. August 26. IE*--.yu'� '
a
W. CC310ti45 i
•!SEAL) •• c
4� zT vol+p�a Stgtted.
A A. PRESCOT r
otar.•: SAI�t^.?
NOTICE OF PtN= NEARM To
ADOPT AND TAANNUTHEPROPOSED
EVALUATION AND APPRAISAL REPORT pq
FOR THE INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
A pubk heerft will the eB�Boyerd of Canty
� c�rtbes, of tin
Bviidrat 1840 22
Street, Vero Be d. a may. Downber
or
17, 1996, at 9:05 a.m. At tits p l* the
r ons ap p themeErduallm s aill Paw
nd
a
RaporC (EAR) to -Ole Indan RNer
lereiYe Plan and trarmrittictg the EAR Bothe SNee
hof Carrrmr$y Atfalra for sufficiency
Ylterested parties may appear and be heard at the
hifto EAR 1 1, nW be Ob.
from the Indian River Comly Mmm*
Do tire tfoar a the CIRUN N ay Ad re�i.l
tion BuYdng located at 1840 25thr Street Caples d
the ictdlvidual EAR etencertf1 wi also be araYeble at
Pal-
ingthe naitli Fbr mom ercdla tits EA
am ti the Lmtb oroAmp I
rig Section at 567-8000, erI 247.
afrt0rft and oor moths aanty's Americans
with DbebiTdes Act p1DA) Cmdkialm at 567-8000
eztwdm 223 at least 48 hours In adrarim ofFlIverd
Board of Car ftdyx s
Ops- Fran B. Aderm C helm c
Dec. 10. 1996 1356516 i
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of December 6, 1996:
TO: James E..Chandler
County Administrator
D I ION HEAD CONCURRENCE:
Robert M. Keit n , AICP,
Community Develop nt D'�ector
- ,4
FROM: Sasan Rohani, AICP `- l( -
n
Chief, Long -Range Planing
DATE: December 6, 1996
RE: CONSIDERATION OF THE INDIAN RIVER COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE
PLAN EVALUATION AND APPRAISAL REPORT
It is requested that the data herein presented be given formal
consideration by the Board of County Commissioners at its regular
meeting of December 17, 1996.
DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS
All local governments in Florida are required to develop a
Comprehensive Plan and to periodically review and assess that plan
through preparation of an Evaluation and Appraisal Report (EAR).
DECEMBER 17, 1996 78
According to state rules, Indian River County must submit its
adopted EAR to the state by January 1, 1997. As the county's
designated local planning agency, the Planning and Zoning
Commission is charged with preparation of the Evaluation and
Appraisal Report. Since November 1995, planning staff has worked
with the Planning and Zoning Commission and other local committees,
as designated by the evaluation and appraisal report public
participation plan, to prepare evaluation and appraisal reports for
each of the 17 elements and sub -elements of the county
comprehensive plan.
Although the adopted Evaluation and Appraisal Report is not due to
the state until January 1, 1997, state law requires that the local
planning agency approve and submit a proposed EAR to the state at
least 90 days prior to the county's January 1, 1997, EAR submittal
date. Accordingly, the local planning agency (the Planning and
Zoning Commission) considered and approved the county's proposed
EAR at a September 12, 1996, public hearing, and staff submitted a
copy of the EAR to the State Department of Community Affairs (DCA)
by the October 1, 1996 deadline.
At the November 5, and November 12, 1996, EAR workshops, the Board
of County Commissioners considered the county's Evaluation and
Appraisal reports and provided direction to staff for modification
of the report.
On November 14, 1996, the county received comments from the
Department of Community Affairs on the county's proposed EAR.
Attached to this agenda item is a copy of proposed Evaluation and
Appraisal Reports for all 17 elements and sub -elements of the
comprehensive plan. These have been revised since the -.-Board's
November EAR workshops to address comments from both the Board of
County Commissioners and the State Department of Community Affairs.
Additions to the proposed Evaluation and Appraisal Report are shown
as underlined. while deletions are shown as strikh.
Overall, the assessment of the county's plan indicates that the
plan has been successful. Of the 124 plan objectives, 93
objectives were achieved; 23 objectives were partially achieved;
and 8 objectives were not achieved. Of the 751 plan policies, 654
policies were implemented; 26 policies were partially implemented;
and 71 policies were not implemented.
Since adoption, the plan has produced orderly growth and
development in the county. Among the plan's accomplishments were
expansion of water and sewer systems to serve major
Commercial/Industrial nodes, acquisition of environmentally
sensitive lands, production of affordable housing units,
development of infill properties, provision of services and
facilities concurrent with development, and others.
�711 4471
At the EAR workshops, the Board of County Commissioners raised
several EAR related issues. Among the concerns were:
• Not to cap the S.R. 60/58th Avenue Commercial/Industrial
node
• Not to eliminate drainage policy 3.4, calling for
establishment of a stormwater utility
• Not to call for annual meetings between the Board of
County Commissioners and School Board
• To address coordination with the Fellsmere Farm Water
Control District regarding the district's rights-of-way
• Minor changes to the economic development element to
indicate the result of the tax abatement referendum and
to eliminate duplicated sentences
• Other minor changes
The attached EAR has addressed all of the Board's concerns.
• DCA Comments
The Department of Community Affairs, in its written assessment,
commented favorably regarding the quality of the county's EAR. The
DCA, however, did identify some concerns and made the following
recommendations:
DECEMBER 17, 1996
79
• Provide a more detailed evaluation of the impact of
statutory and rule changes such as the change to the
Coastal High Hazard Area (CHHA)in the county.
• Evaluate the proposed EAR according to specific urban
sprawl indicators in rule 9J-5.006(5), F.A.C.
• Expand the section of the intergovernmental coordination
element regarding coordination with the school board
consistent with section 163.3177(6)(a),F.S.
• Expand discussion regarding the plan's effectiveness in
protecting and preserving wetlands and wetland functions.
• Revise the EAR to use the most current data available to
describe the existing natural resource conditions within
the county.
• Fully evaluate the impact of the new Coastal High Hazard
Area (CHHA) on the county's adopted Future Land Use
Element and the Future Land Use Map.
• Evaluate affordable housing needs for farmworker housing.
Staff believes that the attached revised EAR addresses all of the
Department of Community Affairs' comments. At the Board of County
Commissioners December 17, 1996, adoption hearing, staff will
present a summary of changes to the EAR.
With respect to the attached EAR, the Board of County Commissioners
has the following options:
to approve the attached EAR
to approve the attached EAR with changes
to reject the attached EAR
Either of the first two options is acceptable and will ensure that
the county can submit its EAR to the state according to schedule.
Staff and the Planning and Zoning Commission recommend that the
Board of County Commissioners approve the Indian River County
Comprehensive Plan Evaluation and Appraisal report by adoption of
the attached resolution and direct staff to submit a copy of the
EAR to the State Department of Community Affairs by January 1,
1997.
Community Development Director Bob Keating pointed out several
changes made since the workshops were held on November 5th and 12th
and noted that the letter received from the DCA was very
complimentary of the Plan. The EAR document identifies changes
which need to be made and the 1997 EAR will include the plan
amendments.
The Chairman opened the public hearing and asked if anyone
wished to be heard in this matter. There being none, she closed
the public hearing.
DECEMBER 17, 1996 80
1�
7
MOTION WAS MADE by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by
Commissioner Ginn, that the Board adopt Resolution
96-161 approving the adoption of the Evaluation and
Appraisal Report (EAR) for the Indian River County
Comprehensive Plan; and authorize the transmittal of
the EAR to the State of Florida, Department of
Community Affairs for sufficiency determination.
Under discussion, Commissioner Tippin commended staff for an
excellent job and noted that, particularly with urban sprawl, we
will have to tread very lightly. The federal government first
complimented the County on its low density and now has a problem
with urban sprawl.
THE CHAIRMAN CALLED THE QUESTION and the
Motion passed unanimously.
RESOLUTION NO. 96- 161
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF -COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN
RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, APPROVING THE ADOPTION OF THE
EVALUATION AND APPRAISAL REPORT (EAR) FOR THE INDIAN RIVER
COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN; AND THE TRANSMITTAL OF THE EAR TO
THE STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS FOR
SUFFICIENCY DETERMINATION.
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners adopted the Indian
River County Comprehensive Plan on February 13, 1990, and
WHEREAS, pursuant to F.S. 163.3191, the Local Planning Agency
(the Planning and Zoning Commission) has prepared an Evaluation and
Appraisal Report (EAR) of the county's comprehensive plan, and
WHEREAS, numerous county advisory groups and the Local
Planning Agency have held public discussion meetings at which the
public commented on the EAR, and
WHEREAS, on September 12, 1996, the Local Planning Agency (the
Planning and Zoning Commission) approved the proposed EAR and
transmitted copies of the proposed EAR to the Department of
Community Affairs and to the Board of County Commissioners, and
WHEREAS, on November 5, 1996, and on November 12, 1996, the
Board of County held public workshops at which interested parties
commented on the EAR, and
WHEREAS, on December 17, 1996, the Board of County
Commissioners held an adoption public hearing at which interested
parties had the opportunity to comment on the EAR, and
WHEREAS, the EAR is consistent with the requirements of
Florida Statutes and The Florida Administrative Code,
DECEMBER 17, 1996 81
PALS.
RESOLUTION NO. 96- 161
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA THAT:
1. The above recitals are ratified in their entirety.
2. The EAR is adopted and approved for transmittal to
the State of Florida Department of Community
Affairs for sufficiency determination.
The forgoing Resolution was offered by Commissioner
Eggert and seconded by Commissioner Ginn
and upon being put to a vote, the vote was as follows:
Chairman Fran B. Adams Aye
Vice -Chairman Carolyn K. Eggert Aye
Commissioner Caroline D. Ginn Aye
Commissioner Kenneth R. Macht Aye
Commissioner John W. Tippin Aye
The Chairman thereupon declared the resolution duly passed and
adopted at a public hearing held this 17th day of December 1996.
ATTEST:
se. uni. �.Vll V1
Approved as to Form and Legal
William G. Collins, II
Deputy County Attorney
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
BY: g) ,
Fran B. Adams, Chairman
I_w
iciency
PUBLIC HEARING - HORIZON GLEN OUTLET CENTER - SPECIAL
EXCEPTION USE CONCEPTUAL PLAN APPROVAL - DRIVING
RANGE. CLUBHOUSE, 9 HOLE GOLF COURSE, AND ASSOCIATED
IMPROVEMENTS
PRESS -JOURNAL
Published Daily
Vero Beach, Indian River County, Florida
COUNTY OF INDIAN RIVER: STATE OF FLORIDA
Before the undersigned authority personally appeared Darryl K. Hicks who on
oath says that he Is President of the Press,loumal, a daffy newspaper published at Vero Beach
in Indian River County, Florida; that the attached copy of advertismnent, being
In the matter of
In the Court, was pub-
lished in said newspaper in the issues of
Affiant further says that the said Press -Journal is a newspaper published at Vero Beach, in
said Wan River County, Florida, and that the said newspaper has heretofore bean
continnxsusiy published in said Indian River County, Florida, each daily and has been entered as
second class man matter at the post office In Vero Beach, in Salo Indian RIm County, Florida,
for a period of one year next preceding the first publication of the attached copy of
advertisement; and affiant further says that he has neither paid nor promised any person, firm
or corporation any discount, rebate, commission or refund for the purpose of securing this
advertisement for publication in said newspaper.
M��MMMt r
o A.
PH
trseobscribed before me thisday of_,D. 1
f'
My Comm. Expires
August25,1997 - 3A.WaA.aL PPEst;vn..NoraRYPUBLIC. (President)
N0. CC310345 state of Florida. %iv ::anutassion Exp. August 25. 19971
OF
"pwa,,,eN^M Sighed'
Ndtarv: SANDRA a. PRESCarr'
DECEMBER 17, 1996 82
NOTICE OF KOM HEARING
N�afheaft tOoOO Wder 9 g OOUf89
hranBdiaiBty &Oudn OT VIB 879 HOIW Outlet
Evans, rustee,
Sections
p.__Jc�w" 33 and Range 38. See the above
" A outlic heaz4g at ,Mich parties In Interest and
dtlzaha area have an oppoCrtuninittyy to be heard, wm
FVwCa antyFbrBoard �lda In dna Cermftsioners cf
slon CheMibera a the County Adrndstratlon Build -
Ing, located at 1840 25th Street, Vero Beach, Flor-
ida on who may a wisher to am.
whlch nrey be made at this wm%i W
are that a verbatim record of the Voaedi gs is
Made. which theludes testimony and eviderm open
AwbONthe aWbNbEased.
A SPECIAL ACCOMMODA-
TION FOR THIS MEETING MUST CONTACT THE
COUNTY'S AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT
(ADA) COORDINATOR AT 5874000 X2.23 AT
LEAST 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE OF THE MEET -
No.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMONERS
BY -s -Fran B. Adams
Nov. 28,1998 1353737
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of December 10, 1996:
TO:
James Chandler
County Administrator
DI SION HEAD CONCURRENCE:
Robert M. Keatirio, AIPg
Community Develofbmen& tirector
THROUGH:
Stan Boling AICP y
Planning Director
FROM:
John W. McCoy, AICP A
Senior Planner, Current Development
DATE:
December 10, 1996
p
NOTICE OF KOM HEARING
N�afheaft tOoOO Wder 9 g OOUf89
hranBdiaiBty &Oudn OT VIB 879 HOIW Outlet
Evans, rustee,
Sections
p.__Jc�w" 33 and Range 38. See the above
" A outlic heaz4g at ,Mich parties In Interest and
dtlzaha area have an oppoCrtuninittyy to be heard, wm
FVwCa antyFbrBoard �lda In dna Cermftsioners cf
slon CheMibera a the County Adrndstratlon Build -
Ing, located at 1840 25th Street, Vero Beach, Flor-
ida on who may a wisher to am.
whlch nrey be made at this wm%i W
are that a verbatim record of the Voaedi gs is
Made. which theludes testimony and eviderm open
AwbONthe aWbNbEased.
A SPECIAL ACCOMMODA-
TION FOR THIS MEETING MUST CONTACT THE
COUNTY'S AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT
(ADA) COORDINATOR AT 5874000 X2.23 AT
LEAST 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE OF THE MEET -
No.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMONERS
BY -s -Fran B. Adams
Nov. 28,1998 1353737
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of December 10, 1996:
TO:
James Chandler
County Administrator
DI SION HEAD CONCURRENCE:
Robert M. Keatirio, AIPg
Community Develofbmen& tirector
THROUGH:
Stan Boling AICP y
Planning Director
FROM:
John W. McCoy, AICP A
Senior Planner, Current Development
DATE:
December 10, 1996
SUBJECT: Horizon Glen Outlet Center's Request for Special
Exception Use Conceptual Plan Approval to Construct a
Driving Range, Clubhouse, 9 Hole Golf Course, and
Associated Improvements
It is requested that the data herein presented be given formal
consideration by the Board of County Commissioners at its meeting
of December 17, 1996.
PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT AND LOCATION BACKGROUND:
Knight, McGuire & Associates, Inc. has submitted an application for
special exception use conceptual plan and major site plan approval
to construct a driving range, clubhouse, 9 hole golf course, and
DECEMBER 17, 1996 83 �� �,
associated improvements. The subject property is located south and
east of the existing Horizon Outlet Mall, and is zoned CG, General
Commercial and RM -6, Residential Multi -Family (up to 6 units/acre).
Construction of the golf course and related improvements require
special exception use approval in the RM -6 zoning district.
The applicant proposes to construct a driving range, clubhouse,
maintenance building, chipping green, parking and putting green in
the project's first phase (Phase I). Phase II consists of a 9 hole
golf course located around Phase I. The conceptual plan and
special exception use request cover both phases. Only Phase I is
covered under the major site plan application.
Pursuant to Section 971.05 of the LDRs, the Board of County
Commissioners is to consider the appropriateness of the requested
use based on the submitted site plan and the suitability of the
site for that use. The Board may approve, approve with conditions
or deny the special exception use. The County may attach any
conditions or safeguards necessary to mitigate impacts and to
ensure compatibility of the use with the surrounding area.
At its November 21, 1996 meeting the Planning and Zoning Commission
voted unanimously (6-0) to grant major site plan approval for Phase
I, subject to special exception use approval by the Board of County
Commissioners. In addition, the Planning and Zoning Commission
voted unanimously to recommend that the Board grant special
exception use approval with minor changes to the conditions
recommended by staff in the Commission's November 21st meeting
back-up material. These added conditions relate to consideration
of access provisions to adjacent properties and a timeframe for
golf course completion or rezoning of the driving range area (see
attachment #5). Planning staff agrees with the Commission's
additional conditions, and these conditions have been incorporated
into the recommendation contained at the end of this report.
ANALYSIS•
1. Site Size:
Phase I (PDA) area: 39.53 acres
Phase II area: 71.01 acres
Total Site Size: 110.54 acres
2. Zoning Classifications:
• CG, General Commercial: 19.80 acres
• RM -6, Residential Multi -Family (up to 6 units/acre): 90.74
acres
3. Land Use Designations:
• C/I, Commercial/Industrial: 19.80 acres
• M-1, Medium Density Residential (up to 8 units/acre): 90.74
acres
4. Building Area: Phase I: 6,098 sq. ft.
Phase II: 0 sq. ft.
S. Pre -development Agreement/Development of Regional Impact
Issue: As part of the original Horizon Outlet Center
approval, the developer was required to obtain a binding
letter of interpretation from the Department of Community
Affairs (DCA) regarding the project's status as a potential
Development of Regional Impact (DRI). The existing Outlet
Center development was determined by DCA not to be a DRI.
The developer is now proposing additional construction which
could exceed the DRI threshold. The developer has met with
DCA regarding the DRI issue, and agreed with DCA to enter into
a pre -development agreement (PDA) which limits the amount of
further development that can occur prior to obtaining DRI
approval for the overall project. That agreement has been
approved by the developer, DCA, and the Indian River County
Board of County Commissioners, and covers the Phase I area.
Thus, Phase I construction may proceed prior to DRI approval.
However, Phase II construction cannot proceed unless and until
DRI approval is granted. _
DECEMBER 17, 1996
84
J
-The PDA allows the driving range (Phase I) to be
constructed prior to the golf course, but requires the
golf course to be constructed within 18 months of DRI
approval. If not constructed within the 18 month
timeframe, the driving range must be rezoned to a stand
alone commercial driving range, or the driving range must
be converted to open space (green area) use. However,
the Planning and Zoning Commission and staff are
recommending that the 18 month timeframe be tied to the
date of PDA approval rather than some future date of DRI
approval. Thus, an 18 month timeframe condition tied to
the PDA approval date is recommended at the end of this
report.
6. Impervious Area:
Phase I: 13.37 acres
Phase II: 1.42 acres
Total: 14.79 acres
7. Open Space: Phase I: Required: 32.501k
Provided: 44.801
Phase II: Required: 40.Oe
Provided: 98.6%
8. Traffic Circulation:
On Site: The site will be accessed through the existing
Horizon Outlet Center by an extension of the Center's main
driving aisle. The driving aisle extension will involve
modifications to an existing on-site traffic circle, and will
provide access to the Phase I parking lot area, club, and
driving range. Access and the circulation design haye been
approved by the traffic engineering division.
Access to Property South of Golf Course: Recently, owners of
residential property located south of the proposed golf course
(zoned residential) approached the county about access to SR
60 through the Horizon Outlet Center site (zoned commercial).
While staff believes it may be beneficial for the residential
property south of the mall/golf course to have access to SR
60, the county has had a general policy against mixing
commercial and residential traffic. In the subject areas, the
properties south of the proposed golf course should be
accessed primarily from 98th Avenue via 8th Street and 12th
Street rights-of-way. The County Surveyor and the engineering
firm for the Indian River Farms Water Control District have
confirmed that there is canal and road right-of-way for 8th
Street and 12th Street between I-95 and 98th Avenue. Once
improved, such rights-of-way can be used for access.
In staff's opinion, providing access through the proposed golf
course for properties to the south would adversely affect
environmentally sensitive lands on the golf course site and
would result in an inconvenient, lengthy and circuitous route
through the golf course and the Horizon Center to SR 60.
Therefore, staff does not support providing access to SR 60
through the proposed golf course for properties south of the
golf course.
A representative of the developer has verbally committed to
providing access to SR 60 for properties to the south of the
new SR 60 access driveway to be constructed with the DRI.
That portion of the overall DRI site is north and west of the
proposed golf course. The developer's commitment would
facilitate SR 60 access as far south as the 12th Street and
8th Street properties referenced above,only if access were to
be extended across other intervening parcels (see attachment
#6). Thus, access to SR 60 would be contingent upon how the
property to the north and west of these properties develops.
The property south of the proposed golf course will be able to
access 98th Avenue from 12th Street and 8th Street, which
staff believes should be the primary access for these
properties. It is staff's opinion that potential access to SR
60 for parcels to the south will best be addressed in the DRI
process. The Planning and Zoning Commission also concluded
that potential SR 60 secondary access for the properties south
DECEMBER 17, 1996 85 ;f��;
t
of the proposed golf course would be best addressed through
the DRI process.
9. Off -Street Parking: Phase I: Required: 58 spaces
Provided: 198 spaces (Phase I)
Phase II: Required: 27 spaces
Provided: 198 spaces (Phase I)
Total: Required: 85 spaces
Provided: 198 spaces
Note: All parking will be constructed with Phase I.
10. Stormwater Management: The stormwater management plan has
been approved by the public works department, and a Type "A"
stormwater permit must be obtained by the applicant.
A portion of the Phase I area of development is covered by an
undeveloped Indian River Farms Water Control District canal
right-of-way. This right-of-way is not a part of the 12th
Street and 8th Street right-of-way referenced in item #8 of
this analysis. The applicant has indicated that the Farms
formally abandoned this right-of-way in October; however, the
applicant has not yet provided staff any documentation of the
abandonment. The applicant will need to furnish documentation
of the abandonment prior to site plan release.
11. Landscape Plan: The landscape plan is in conformance with
Chapter 926.
12. Utilities: The facility will be serviced by county water and
wastewater services. These utility provisions have been
approved by the Department of Utility Services and the
Environmental Health Department.
13. Dedications and Improvements: None are required.
14. Concurrency: No concurrency is required for Phase I, since it
is accessory to the golf course. The developer has obtained
conditional concurrency for the golf course, which is
sufficient for conceptual plan and special exception approval.
15. Environmental Issues:
sUplands: Since the site is over 5 acres and contains native
upland habitat, the native upland set-aside requirement of
section 929.05 applies. Approximately 31.52 acres of the
Phase I project site consist of native upland habitat.
Accordingly, a set-aside of 15%, or 4.72 acres, is required to
comply with the criteria of section 929.05. The applicant
will be preserving 6.98 acres in a conservation easement
located between the Phase I site and I-95, and this will
satisfy the set-aside requirement for Phase I. The
conservation easement document will need to be approved by the
county attorney's office and recorded prior to release of the
approved site plan. The set-aside requirement for Phase II
will be determined during review of the site plan for Phase
II.
SWetlands: While there are no wetlands in the 39.53 acres
comprising Phase I, 21.96 acres of the 71.01 acres in Phase II
are wetlands. Based on the golf course conceptual plan, there
will be no impact on these wetland areas. Therefore, no
mitigation is required.
16. Specific Land Use Criteria:
1. Golf courses and accessory facilities shall not be
interpreted to include free-standing commercial miniature
golf courses or other unenclosed commercial amusements;
Note: N/A.
DECEMBER 17, 1996
86
2. No major accessory use or principal building or structure
shall be located closer than one hundred (100) feet to
any lot line which abuts a residentially designated
property; however, the one hundred (100) foot setback may
be reduced to normal zoning district setbacks if the use
of the abutting residentially designated property is
nonresidential (e.g. institutional, recreation, community
services uses) and if a type "B" buffer with six (6) foot
opaque feature is provided between the building and
structures and the abutting residentially designated
property.
Note: All proposed golf course buildings are set back at
least 100' from property boundaries.
3. Golf courses shall, to the most reasonable extent, retain
and preserve native vegetation over at least thirty (30)
percent of the total upland area of the course due to
their characteristically high water demand and heavy
nutrient loads.
Note: The conceptual plan for Phase I and II exceeds the
3001 requirement.
4. The golf courses shall be designed so that any lighting
is shielded and directed away from residential areas.
Note: No golf course lighting is proposed.
5. Type "B" screening shall be provided between golf
maintenance facilities and adjacent residentially
designated property within two hundred (200) feet -of the
golf maintenance facility.
Note: The maintenance structure is set back more than
200' from a property boundary. Therefore, no buffer is
required.
17. Surrounding Land Use and Surrounding:
North: Outlet Mall/CG
South: Vacant/RM-6
East: I-95, Vacant, Industrial Building Transfer Park/CG,
CH, IL, RMH-8, A-1
West: Vacant/A-1
RECONIl MATION
Based on the analysis performed, staff recommends that the Board of
County Commissioners grant conceptual site plan and special
exception use approval for Phases I and II, with the following
conditions:
1. That, through the DRI application, the developer shall address
potential SR 60 access to properties south of the overall DRI
project area. However, no such access shall be required
through the golf course area.
2. That, prior to site plan release for Phase I, the applicant
shall provide documentation that the Indian River Farms Water
Control District has abandoned its right-of-way within the
Phase I area of development.
3. That, prior to site plan release for construction of Phase II,
the developer shall obtain DRI approval.
4. That the developer shall commence construction of the golf
course within 18 months of the date of PDA approval, or have
completed the rezoning process that allows a stand alone
driving range. If neither option has occurred within the 18
month timeframe, the driving range use will cease and be
converted to an open space use.
DECEMBER 17, 1996 87 a a
o
Planning Director Stan Boling reviewed the project and stated
that the Planning and Zoning Commission has recommended approval.
Commissioner Eggert questioned the zoning on 98th Avenue and
noted that she does not like the mix of industrial and residential
zoning.
Director Boling advised that the 98th Avenue zoning will be a
mix of commercial and industrial.
Commissioner Macht questioned whether the DRI process would
assure the property owners to the south of the project access to
their property, and Director Boling responded that the DRI process
could not assure access but staff has investigated the rights-of-
way for canals and roads. There are private easements which may
have changed over the years; however, staff is recommending access
through either 8th and/or 12th Streets and the DRI process will
investigate secondary access to SR -60 which would require
cooperation from private property owners.
The Chairman opened the public hearing and asked if anyone
wished to be heard in this matter.
Hank Parman of 601 Sea Oak Drive, owner of property to the
south of the project, appreciated the developer's attitude toward
the surrounding property owners. However, he was concerned about
the mixing of commercial and residential zoning. It is difficult
to go anywhere in the County without going through a commercial
area. He was not against the project but would like to see
something to assure that the private property owners get access to
SR -60.
Evelyn Neville of 4580 22nd Lane, owner of 46 acres south of
the project, just north of Mr. Parman's property, expressed the
same concerns regarding access to SR -60.
David Knight of Knight and McGuire, the project engineer,
explained that the developer has significant problems with granting
access through the environmentally sensitive southern portion of
the property. There are 50 acres there which have been set aside
as a preservation area. There are access corridors through the
project but only for maintenance vehicles.
Ralph Evans of 1420 Shorelands Drive, trustee for. the
developer, advised that the project allows for public access only
through the existing shopping mall roads which would not support
additional traffic from the south.
The Chairman asked if anyone else wished to be heard in this
matter. There being none, she closed the public hearing.-_
DECEMBER 17, 1996 88
S
MOTION WAS MADE by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by
Commissioner Ginn, that the Board grant conceptual
site plan approval and special exception use for
Phases I and II of Horizon Glen Outlet Center's
development, with the conditions recommended by
staff.
Under discussion, Director Keating felt that the best course
of action would be to look at the need for access in the DRI
hearings. A thoroughfare plan could be included for direct north -
south access.
Commissioner Macht wanted to include an access requirement in
the motion, and Director Boling advised that Phase II of the
project is tied to DRI approval and that would be the appropriate
time to include requirements of that type.
THE CHAIRMAN CALLED THE QUESTION and the
Motion passed unanimously.
COPY OF UNEXECUTED AGREEMENT IS ON FILE IN THE OFFICE
OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
PUBLIC HEARING - TABLED FROM DECEMBER 3 1996 - UTILITY
SERVICES REQUEST FOR SPECIAL EXCEPTION USE APPROVAL
EXPAND SOUTH COUNTY WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT
PRESS -JOURNAL
Published Daily
Vero Beach, Indian River County, Florida
COUNTY OF INDIAN RIVER: STATE OF FLORIDA
Before the undersigned authority W`9ona0y appeared Darryl K. Hicks who on
oath says that he is President of the Press-Joumai, a daily newspaper published at Vero Beach
b Indian River County, Fbrida; that the attached copy of advertisement, beer g
a.
In the matter of IAI)��La !42
b the Court, was pub -
fished in said newspaper In the issues o�J• 1'949k
Affiant further says that the said PressJo ural Is a newspaper published at Vero Beach, in
said Indian River County, Florida, and that the said newspaper has heretofore been
continuously published in said Indian River County, Florida, each daily and has been entered as
second lass map matter at the post office in Vero Beach, In said Indian River County, Fbrida,
for a period Of ate year next preceding the fust publication of the attached copy of
advertisement: and aff�rnt further says that he has neither paid nor promised any persol, firm
or tion any discount. rebate, carnrndssbn or refund for the purpose of Securing this
Mg(erg hent for publication in said newspaper.
yPSwom toValbed before me this 0 day �D.1
4
Comm. Expires'; _
Au9119125,1997
sAh'DRA A. PREaC01T. NO ARY PL WC. ( )
No. CC3tg8q$ state of Flom +u. Nr` Commisalor. c'sD. AuQuac 25.1997
1r �'` Commu9ion . um .r. CC31 )843
FLD���P
~�wwrwwgA� S1gth
puF. -077 �
i
DECEMBER 17, 1996 89
RM -6
Site -
� ASS .,i�9;�'i}r+•;''':;y� Sr;:};
NOTICE OF PUBUC NEARING
CNotice of hoe" to consider the grarrtkg of spe-
W exception use approval to an of the
south Pot caahty Is presently owned by Irdan River
� � 40. S eine above in � for ft 31, breaftLYpn• 33
A pubYc ►hae►ing at which parties in Merest and ,
iJtizer� anal have an opporhahity to be heard, will
be held by the Board of CoxftQormrissioners of
Indian River Cmity. Florida, in ft Connie -
On Clreh des of ft AdmWs�baton Bi ld-
t+o located at 1840 251h Street, Vara Beach,'Fba
Ida an Tuesday, Decembe 3,1998 at 8:05 aAL ,
I .ArWe' who may wish any aeuidon
Wich may be made Aft%w1 rhaed m en-
sure that a vwbatlm record of the proceedings is
rrhade. which Includes tesdrnorhy and evidence upon
which the ep�al Is based.
A SP
ANYONE YVHO NEEDS ECIAL A000MMODA-
ZFOR TEAS MEETING MUST CONTACT THE
S AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT
COORDINATOR AT 5874OW X223 AT
T 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE OF THE MEET-
ING.
. ' BOARD OF COUNTY GONERS 9
BY-s•Fran B. Adrns
Ngv.8.Im 1349199 i
-n. A ion pAcr ori
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of December 11, 1996:
TO: James E. Chandler
County Administrator
D ION HEAD CONCURRENCE:
Obert R. Keating, A C
Community Development Director
THROUGH: Stan Boling, AICP
Planning Director
FROM: John W. McCoy, AICP `JVJti%\
Senior Planner, Current Development
DATE: December 11, 1996
SUBJECT: Continuation of the Department of Utility Services
Request for Special Exception Use Approval to Expand the
South County Wastewater Treatment Plant
It is requested that the data herein presented be given formal
consideration by the Board of County Commissioners at its regular
meeting of December 17, 1996.
DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS:
At its December 3, 1996, meeting the Board of County Commissioners
tabled the above referenced matter to its December 17, 1996
meeting. The Board also directed the applicant, Utility Services,
to explore alternative designs that would result in partial or
complete preservation of the oak hammock located in the northeast
corner of the site. The site is located in Vero Beach Highlands at
the northeast corner of 6th Avenue S.W. and 25th Street S.W. At
its December 17th meeting, the Board is to consicger updated
information on alternative designs and costs, continue the special
exception use request public hearing, and take final action on the
request.
ANALYSIS:
Since the December 3rd Board meeting, planning staff, utility
services staff, and the project engineering consultant met to
revisit and formulate various alternative design solutions which
could conceptually meet county, state, and federal development
regulations and preserve all or a portion of the oak hammock on the
site. Utility Services and its consultant then estimated
additional development costs, over and above the December 3rd
proposed plan, for each alternative design.
Utilities Services has identified 7 options, two of which involve
using the December 3rd plan design and relocating oak trees to the
Indian River Club site. The other 5 options involve varying
degrees of treatment plant and site plan redesign to preserve all
or portions of the oak hammock. The redesigns vary in scope from
the relocation of several structures to changing the function of
the site and constructing a new plant at a new location. The
corresponding costs for various alternatives range from zero
additional dollars to over $3,000,000 (see attachment #1).
Planning staff has reviewed attachment #1,and it is planning
staff's opinion that all of the alternative designs could meet the
LDRs. At least one of the designs would require special
cooperation of the Indian River Club to find compensatory cut for
fill within the flood zone on the treatment plant site. The cut
area would need to be guaranteed through some type of acceptable
legal document executed by Indian River Club and the County.
DECEMBER 17, 1996
90
C7
Attached is draft information from the applicant regarding various
design alternatives and estimated, associated costs (see attachment
#1). Between the date of this report and the December 17th Board
meeting, utility services staff is scheduled to meet at the project
site with planning staff, Commissioner Tippin, and Indian River
Club developer Bob Swift, to evaluate the alternative designs in
relation to actual field conditions. At the December 17th Board
meeting, utility services staff and its consultant will present
updated, alternative designs and associated additional costs.
Based upon planning staff's original report and recommendation (see
attachment #2), information presented by the applicant at the
December 17th meeting, and other public hearing discussion, the
Board will have sufficient information to direct the applicant to
make any necessary site plan changes in accordance with the desired
design alternative, and to act on the requested special exception
use approval.
RECOMMENDATION:
Planning staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners:
1. Choose one of the design alternatives presented and require
the applicant to make any necessary site plan revisions prior
to site plan release and on-site clearing.
2. Grant special exception use approval, with the following
condition:
a. Prior to site plan release for Phase I construction, the
applicant shall obtain a county wetland resource -permit
and an FDEP permit for the wetland filling proposed in
Phase I.
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
South County WWPP Expansion
Project Design and Alternatives
Project Design
- Indian River Club relocates desired trees. Remaining trees removed.
Alternate No. l
- County relocates trees to buffer area on Indian River Club property.
$150,000
Alternate No. 2
- Relocate future aeration basin to wetland/stormwater area
$306,000
Alternate No. 3
- Relocate future headworks and aeration basin
$451,000
Alternate No. 4
- Relocate future aeration basin to percolation pond area.
$641,000
Alternate No. 5
- Relocate expansion of new facilities to percolation pond area.
$2,550,000
Alternate No. 6
- Convert plant to pump station and construct new plant at another location.
$3,175,000
e
DECEMBER 17, 1996 90 (a)
I
" ,0K 190 PACE
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
South County WWTP Expansion
Project Design
■ Maximizes the use of existing plant tankage.
■ Optimizes hydraulics of plant.
■ Operation and maintenance costs minimized.
• Provides access road around plant for service/sludge hauling and minimizes the liability on County property.
■ Meets County cut/fill balance requirements.
■ Meets FDEP permitting requirements.
■ Indian River Club relocates desired trees.
■ Remaining trees removed.
• No piping revisions.
State permitting requirements are met and permits will be issued very soon.
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
_ South -County W WTP Expansion
Alternate No. I - County Relocates Trees to Buffer Areas on Indian River Club Property
■ Maximizes the use of existing plant tankage. Additional Cost
■ Optimizes hydraulics of plant.
■ Operation and maintenance costs minimized.
■ Provides access road around plant for service/sludge hauling and minimizes the
liability on County property.
■ Meets County cut/fill balance requirements.
■ Meets FDEP permitting requirements.
■ County relocates trees to buffer area to buffer areas on Indian River Club property. $150,000
■ No piping revisions
TOTAL ADDITIONAL COST $150,000
Comment: This alternate was not pursued because of the unjust cost Impact to utility customer.
DECEMBER 17, 1996 90 (b)
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
South County WWTP Expansion
Alternate No. 2
Relocate Future Aeration Basin to Wetland/Stormwater Area
■ Maximizes the use of existing plant tankage.
■ Minor impact on future plant hydraulics.
Additional Cost
■ Operation and maintenance costs minimized.
■ Additional piping required.
$25,000
■ County cut/fill balance requirement not met (violation of County P&Z requirement).
■ Saves Oak Hammock.
■ Impacts more wetland area, additional mitigation required.
50,000
■ Foundation questionable, removal of muck required.
200,000
■ Increased liability for removal of access road for service/sludge hauling.
■ Delays construction of this phase.
1,000
■ Additional engineering/permitting required.
OLW
TOTAL ADDITIONAL COST
$306,000
Comment: This alternate was not pursued due to wetland impacts and permitting difficulties with
FDEP/ACOEISJRWMD. County cut/fill balance requirements cannot be met. Foundation in wetland
area is unknown and would require further investigation.
• Costs include County/FDEP/ACOS/SJRWMD mitigation impacts.
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
South County W WTP Expansion
Alternate No. 3 - Relocate Future Headworks and Aeration Basin
■ Maximizes the use of existing plant tankage. Additional Cos
■ Impacts future plant hydraulics.
a Operation and maintenance costs minimized.
■ Existing raw sewage pipelines relocation and abandonment.
$250,000
■ Relocating of existing pump station and piping.
150,000
■ County cut/fill balance requirements met.
■ Saves Oak Hammock.
■ Foundation investigation required.
■ Increased liability for removal of access road for service/sludge hauling.
1,000
■ Delays construction of this phase.
■ Additional engineering/permitting required. so
TOTAL ADDITIONAL COST $451,000
Comment: This alternate was not pursued because of the uMust cost to utility customer and the
possibility of FDEP/ACOEISJRWMD claiming the area east of percolation ponds as a wetland. Requires
relocation of existing raw sewage pipelines and pump station.
DECEMBER 17, 1996 90 (C)
,nrJK DO PAGE 101
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
South County WWTP Expansion
Alternate No. 4 - Relocate Future Aeration Basin to Percolation Pond
■ Maximizes the use of existing plant tankage.
Additional Cost
■ Impacts future plant hydraulics - pumping required.
$100,000
■ Operation and maintenance costs increased.
50,000
• Excavation/filling of existing pond required.
300,000
• County cut/fill balance requirement not met.
■ Lose effluent storage in ponds - storage tank required (FDEP requires three day storage)
100,000
■ Piping modifications required.
30,000
■ Saves Oak Hammock
■ Increased liability for removal of access road for service/sludge hauling.
■ Delays construction of this phase.
1,000
■ Additional engineering/permitting required.
60.000
TOTAL ADDITIONAL COST
$641,000
Comment: This alternate was not pursued due to additional storage requirements to replace existing
percolation pond. rnrrnaand enol wn uld b +HaidbV�� ti�it� n�gtomer.
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
South County WWI? Expansion
Alternate No. 5
Relocate Expansion of New Facilities to Percolation Pond Area
Additional Cost
■ Lose effluent storage in ponds - storage tank required g eq (FDEP requires three day storage) $300,000
■ Use of existing facilities marginal (limited) (differential cost)
2,000,000
• Split train treatment system not desirable
• County cut/fill balance requirements net
■ No wetland impact
■ Saves Oak Hammock
• Additional engineering/permitting required
250.0
TOTAL ADDITIONAL COST $2,550,000
Comment: This alternate was not pursued due to additional storage requirements to replace existing
percolation ponds. Increased costs would be paid by utility customer.
DECEMBER 17, 1996 90 (d)
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
South County WWTP Expansion
Alternate No. 6
Convert Plant to Pump Station/Construct New Plant at Another Location
Additional Cost
■ Convert plant to pump station $300,000
■ Construct new plant at another location (differential cost) 2, =,000
■ Existing tankage not utilized - abandon/demolition 500,Q00
■ Effluent pumping natation and filters relocated to new location (cost included above)
■ Cost to deliver reuse water to South County WWTP sites 75,000
■ Additional engineering/permitting required 300,000
TOTAL ADDITIONAL COST $3,175,000
Comment: This alternate was not pursued since the County has too much invested in the existing site.
Increased costs not iustified to utility customer.
Utilities Director Terry Pinto requested 'that the Board
approve Phase I of the project and referred to discussion with the
Board about saving the trees on the site. He confirmed there are
only 2 trees affected by this Phase which can be relocated. He
thanked Commissioner Tippin for going out to the site and
recommending alternatives for saving the trees.
Chairman Adams noted that in 5 to 10 years the County may have
commissioners who may not be as concerned about trees as the
current Board so the Board wants to see the project include these
restrictions.
Commissioner Tippin confirmed the need to retain the existing
hammock. There is only one live oak and it should be moved in
January when it is dormant. Then, in a couple of months, a
workshop will be held to discuss methods of saving trees. That
would be the time to make a real plan for the hammock because plans
for Phase II of the project are too vague now.
Commissioner Ginn questioned whether it would be necessary to
locate Phase II where it is now proposed, and Director Pinto stated
options are still possible.
Commissioner Ginn had viewed the site and felt it was an
ideal site. She agreed we need to do anything we can to preserve
the hammock.
DECEMBER 17, 1996
91
-111" BOO PAGE10?
r
"1 100 PacE610
The Chairman opened the public hearing and asked if anyone
wished to be heard in this matter.
Bob Swift of 6450 8th Street, general manager of the Indian
River Club, thanked staff for working with them. Mr. Swift showed
a copy of an aerial photograph and questioned whether a vegetative
buffer zone was to be cut 2 feet to provide a drainage path to the
retention pond.
Director Pinto responded that the area indicated contains
pepper trees and that would be done only if absolutely necessary.
Mr. Swift stated that his only concern was that everyone have
a very clear understanding of what will be allowed. He strongly
urged the Board to continue their policy of not removing any trees
unless absolutely necessary as less than 60% survive
transplantation.
The Chairman asked if anyone else wished be to heard in this
matter. There being none, she closed the public hearing.
MOTION WAS MADE by Commissioner Tippin, SECONDED by
Commissioner Eggert, that the Board approve
Alternate 2, special exception use approval for the
expansion of the South County Wastewater Treatment
Plant, with the conditions recommended by staff, and
with the clear understanding that no live oaks will
be disturbed with the exception of the one to be
relocated.
Under discussion, Commissioner Tippin confirmed that he
supported Phase I of the project as long as it is clearly
understood that the live oak hammock will not be disturbed and that
a workshop will be held soon.
THE CHAIRMAN CALLED THE QUESTION and the
Motion passed unanimously.
DECEMBER 17, 1996 92
PUBLIC HEARING - IDLEWYLDE CORP., INC - REQUEST FOR
CONCEPTUAL PD SPECIAL EXCEPTION USE APPROVAL AND
APPEAL OF PRELIMINARY PD DENIAL - 109 LOT SINGLE-FAMILY
PLANNED DEVELOPMENT - THE SANCTUARY
PRESS -JOURNAL
Published Daily
Vero Beach, Indian River County, Florida
COUNTY OF INDIAN RIVER: STATE OF FLORIDA
Before the undersigned authority personally appeared Darryl K. Hicks who on
oath says that he is President of the Press -Journal, a daffy newspaper published at Vero Beach
In Indian River County, Florida; that the attached copy of advertisement, being
a./Oal CP
in the matter 6 -
in the Court, was pub.
lished in said newspaper in the issues of
Affiant further says that the said Press-Joumal is a newspaper published at Vero Beach, in
said Indian River County, Florida, and that the said newspaper has. heretofore been
continuously published in said Indian River County, Florida, each daily and has been entered as
second class mail matter at the post office In Vero Beach, in said Indian River County, Florida,
fora period of or* year next preceding Ute first publloation of the attached copy of
advertisement: and affiant further says that he has neither paid nor promised any person, firm
or corporation any discount, rebate, commission or refund for the purpose of securing this
AAaddivertisement for publication in said newspaper.
P�5w0YfP o� before me this day ofA— L/. .D. 19
:- My Comm. Expires `s // •
August 25,1997 s SA.NDRAA. PRESCart, v(7CARYPlBLIc. (President)
No, Od10�r i State of Florida, �lv Comintasion Exp. August 25. 199
mrrassion. a r.
OF A
,rAM Siped-
olur: aVT14d, a. PRE5COIT%
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEAR=
Notice of heartg to =tsk er the W of spe-
Ciel exmpdon use approw for a 1- 09 6t eine
fmNydevelopmrit
9M of ob Averitie an the
proopM��ty a of 33rd street (Cherry Lane} The
IQrtyr end b� h 3e��brt 3`t T�avreh�ip 3 �md
Ranpe 39. Seethe above map for the location.
A. PL heha t9 at which parries in hterest and
ddzere aftel have -an CppordNgr to be heard, will
be held by the Board of Cant pomrtdssloners of
Indian RK* ty ConT&
don Chemrbers of the�Cm* Adr*kir tlon Butd-
ft boded at 1840 25th street, Vero Beach, Fla
ids on Tuesday, Dawrrber 17, 1996 at 9:05 am.
aw
which may bye ntaadee at may � �.0 need
sue that a verbatim record of prooseaw is
made, which Iridudes testirnony and evWwm upon
which the appal Is based
ANYONE WHO NEEDS A SPECIAL ACCOMMODA-
TION FOR THE MEETING MUST CONTACT THE
COUNTY'S AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT
nCOORDINATOR AT 667.800 X223 AT
LEAST 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE OF THE MEET-
IN(L
ROM RIVER COUNTY
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
BY -8 -Fran B. Adams
Nov. 26, IM 1353546
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of December 11, 1996:
TO:
James Chandler
County Administrator
D S ON HEAD CONCURRE r-
ert M. eati g, ICP ;
Community De�/velopme t Di' for
THROUGH:
Stan BolineAiiCP
Planning Director
FROM:
John W. McCoy, AICP_j >,M
Senior Planner, Current Development
DATE:
December 11, 1996
SUBJECT: Idlewylde Corp. Inc. 's Request for Conceptual Planned
Development Special Exception Use Approval and Appeal of
Preliminary Planned Development Denial for a 109 Lot
Single Family Planned Development to be known as The
Sanctuary
It is requested that the data herein presented be given formal
consideration by the Board of County Commissioners at its meeting
of December 17, 1996.
DECEMBER 17, 1996 93� PAG
100 ��;
r -1
ion
DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS:
Knight, McGuire & Associates, Inc. has submitted an application for
conceptual PD plan and special exception use approval on behalf of
Idlewylde Corp. Inc. to construct a single phase, 109 lot detached
single family PD to be known as The Sanctuary. In addition to the
conceptual PD plan and special exception use request, the applicant
is also requesting preliminary PD plan approval (site plan and
preliminary plat) for the project.
The subject property is located on the north side of 33rd Street
approximately } mile west of 58th Avenue (see attachment #2). The
property has 990' of frontage on 33rd Street and is zoned RS -3,
Residential Single Family (up to 3 units per acre).
•PD Project Process
As a PD project, the process involved in review and approval of
this proposal is as follows:
Approval Needed Reviewing Bod
1. Conceptual Plan/Special Exception PZC & BCC
2. Preliminary PD Plan PZC
3. Land Development Permits or Waiver Staff
4. Final PD Plat BCC
The applicant is now requesting approval of the first two steps.
If approved by the Board of County Commissioners, the applicant
will need to obtain a land development permit for the required PD
infrastructure improvements.
•Board of County Commissioners Consideration
Pursuant to Section 971.05 of the LDRs, the Board of County
Commissioners is to consider the appropriateness of the requested
conceptual PD plan based on the submitted PD plan and suitability
of the site for that use. The Board may approve, approve with
conditions, or deny the special -exception use. The County may
attach any conditions and safeguards necessary to mitigate impacts
and to ensure compatibility of the use with the surrounding area.
If the Board of County Commissioners approves the special exception
use, it would also be granting the applicant's appeal of the
preliminary PD plan/plat denial.
•Planning and Zoning Commission Action
At its November 26, 1996 meeting, the Planning and Zoning
Commission voted unanimously (6-0) to:
• Deny the preliminary planned development plan/plat submitted,
and
• Recommend that the Board of County Commissioners deny the
special exception use request.
The Planning and Zoning Commission based its decision on general
compatibility issues. Please see the minutes of the Planning and
Zoning Commission meeting (attachment #4), and item #18 under the
"ANALYSIS" section of this report. The Board is now to act on the
special exception use, conceptual plan, and preliminary PD plan
requests.
ANALYSIS:
1. Size of Development:
37.55 acres gross
37.07 acres net (less future right-of-way for 33rd Street)
2. Zoning: RS -3, Residential Single Family (up to 3 units per
acre)
3. Land Use Designation: L-1, Low Density (up to 3 units per
acre)
DECEMBER 17, 1996 94
4. Density:
109 units on 37.55 acres = 2.90 units/acre (gross)
109 units on 37.07 acres = 2:94 units/acre (net)
Note: The net density figure is calculated on 37.07 acres
which reflects an additional 20' of right-of-way to be
acquired for 33rd Street.
5. Lot Size:
RS -3 Minimum: 12,000 sq. ft.
Minimums proposed: 6,875 to 12,000 sq. ft. (see item 16)
6. Open Space: Required: 14.83 acres or 40.00% of the site
Provided: 17.33 acres or 46.75% of the site
Below is a summary of the open space provided:
Lake Area:
Green Area Around Lake:
Private Green Space:
Private Impervious Area:
Recreation Facility:
Sidewalk:
4.421 acres or 30% of 14.83 acres
1.41 acres
8.612 acres
1.481 acres or 10% of 14.83 acres
1.37 acres
.04 acres (sidewalk outside of
richt-of-wav only)
17.33 acres or 46.7 % of the site
Note': Lake area can account for no more than 30% of required
open space, and private impervious area (e.g. patios) can
account for no more than 10%.
Note2: Private green space area is based upon 30% of
individual lots being green open space, an amount the
applicant will need to document when submitting for single
family building permits, by showing open space calculations on
the plot plan for each building.
7. Recreation Area: Required: 1.31 acres
Provided: 2.34 acres
The recreation area is provided via a clubhouse, pool, tennis
courts, and sidewalks. Although the general layout and
location of the recreation area improvements are depicted on
the preliminary PD plan and the improvements have been
accounted for in the drainage design, the level of detail is
not sufficient for final site plan approval. Therefore, prior
to issuance of a building permit for the recreation
improvements, the applicant will need to file for and obtain
a separate site plan administrative approval for the
recreation improvements.
8. Phasing: The project will be constructed in one phase.
9. Environmental Issues:
•Uplands: Since the project area is over 5 acres, the native
upland set-aside requirement of section 929.05 applies to any
native upland areas on site. However, the upland area of the
site consists of improved pasture area with scattered pine
trees. The improved pasture has been deemed not to be native
upland; therefore, no native upland set-aside requirement
applies.
•Wetlands: There are two isolated wetlands on the site, which
total 1.55 acres. The developer is proposing to fill all 1.55
acres of wetlands. The developer will be required to mitigate
the filling of the wetlands and obtain wetland resource
permits from the county and the St. Johns River Water
Management District. These permits will need to be acquired
prior to the issuance of a land development permit. Based on
the wetland mitigation requirements and the relatively small
sizes of the subject isolated wetlands, environmental planning
staff has no objection to PD plan approval.
DECEMBER 17, 1996 95 00K00,
'nOK 100, PA,H 107
*Excavation: A 4.42 acre lake is proposed to be created. The
excavation of the lake will involve the removal of more than
5,000 cubic yards of excavated material from the site. Such
activity is considered incidental to project construction and
is allowed and regulated by the provisions of the Chapter 934
mining regulations. Such regulations limit hauling and
excavation to 7:00 a.m. - 5:00 p.m. Monday through Friday for
a 2 month period. Prior to issuance of a land development
permit, the developer must obtain from planning staff a mining
permit exemption subject to the criteria of LDR section
934.04(7)(b).
10. Stormwater Management: As with standard single family
subdivisions, the stormwater management plan has been given
conceptual approval by the public works department. Final
review and approval of the stormwater management plan shall be
accomplished through the land development permit process.
11. Thoroughfare Plan: The project has 990' of frontage on 33rd
Street (Cherry Lane), which is classified as a collector
roadway requiring 80' of right-of-way. Presently, 60' of
right-of-way exists for 33rd Street. The additional 20' will
need to be acquired from this property, since there is a canal
on the south side of 33rd Street which precludes acquisition
from that side of the road. The PD plan design accommodates
the acquisition of the additional 20' of right-of-way.
12. Traffic Circulation: The project will be accessed from 33rd
Street by an internal subdivision road that will provide
access to all of the lots. The interior road system will
provide a loop road through the project and one east/west cul-
de-sac road. These roads will provide access to all of the
lots. The traffic engineering division has approved the
internal traffic circulation plan.
Staff has asked the applicant to explore street
interconnections to the properties to the north, east, and
west of the project site. The applicant wants to keep the
internal rights-of-way private, and does not want to provide
street interconnections to adjacent properties that would not
be part of the development. The applicant has proposed a
potential future interconnection with the property to the
north, which the developer may develop as a future additional
phase and expansion of The Sanctuary. The proposed potential
interconnection shall either be developed as a private road
right-of-way if the property to the north is approved and
developed as an addition of The Sanctuary, or shall be
developed as Lot 26 of the Sanctuary. It should be noted that
Lot 26 is counted as one of the 109 lots proposed.
In the past, the county has not required vehicular
interconnections for private developments of this size where
such interconnections are not needed for access to adjacent
properties. Since the proposed development is to be private
and is close to 40 acres in size, and since it does not appear
that any adjacent properties would require access through the
subject project site for development, it is staff's opinion
that a vehicular interconnection is not required. However,
staff has recommended that the applicant accommodate future
interconnection opportunities, and the proposed plan does so
for the property north of the project site.
Since the project will generate more than 1,000 average daily
trips (ADT), a traffic impact analysis was required. Such an
analysis was submitted by the applicant's traffic engineering
consultant and was reviewed by county traffic engineering
staff. The analysis indicates that no off-site traffic
improvements are required, but recommends that a right -turn
lane for 33rd Street westbound traffic be constructed for the
project. The traffic engineering division has recommended,
and the developer has agreed, to construct a right -turn lane
at the project entrance prior to issuance of a certificate of
completion for the project.
DECEMBER 17, 1996
96
M
�_J
13. Dedications and Improvements: The developer is required to
construct a 5' wide public sidewalk along the project's 33rd
Street frontage. The sidewalk will need to be constructed or
bonded -out prior to the issuance of a certificate of
completion for the project. The developer will also be
required to construct streetlights for the subdivision.
14. Pedestrian Circulation: The developer will construct a 5'
sidewalk within the subdivision on both sides of the loop road
and the cul-de-sac road. Such sidewalk improvements will meet
the PD pedestrian system requirements.
15. Utilities: County potable water and wastewater services are
available to the site, and connection is mandatory. The
project will connect to county water and wastewater services.
County utilities has approved the connection to water and
wastewater services.
16. Proposed Waivers: Through the PD process, the applicant has
requested the following waivers from the normal RS -3
standards.
Note': The frontyard setback is proposed to be 10' for side entry
garages, and double frontage lots may have a 10' setback on the
higher volume street.
Note2: All perimeter lots will need to meet the 25 perimeter
setback for the principal structure. Pool, deck, and patios on the
perimeter will need to meet the setback criteria of 914.12.
Note 3: All structures on separate lots will be detached and will
have a 10' minimum separation.
Note °: The lots along the south perimeter are smaller than 12,000
square feet, based on the area set-aside for future 33rd Street
right-of-way.
DECEMBER 17, 1996 97
ion
J
RS -3
Proposed
South
North, East,
Standard
Minimum PD
Perimeter
and West
Standard
Lots
Perimeter
for
Lots
Interior
Lots
Lot Width*2
801
551
80'
801
Number of lots
N/A
59
9
41
House sideyard
15'
0 to 10'3
15'
15'
setback
House: front & rear
25'
Front:20'
25'
setbacks
10'/20'1
Rear: 1012
Pools:
Side
15'
5'
15'
T5'
Rear
101
5'
10'
10'
Patios & Decks:
Rear:
10'
S'
10'
10'
Side:
15'
3'
15'
15'
Front:
25'
S'
251
25'
Maximum lot coverage
308
458
308
308
(individual lots
building):
Total impervious:
608
708
608
608
Minimum open space
408
3085
408
408
2
r individual lot*
Lot Size
12,000 sq.
6,875 sq.
9,874 sq.
12,000 sq.
ft.
ft.
ft.
ft.
Perimeter buffer
None
N/A
Type licit
None
buffer with
6' opaque
feature
Note': The frontyard setback is proposed to be 10' for side entry
garages, and double frontage lots may have a 10' setback on the
higher volume street.
Note2: All perimeter lots will need to meet the 25 perimeter
setback for the principal structure. Pool, deck, and patios on the
perimeter will need to meet the setback criteria of 914.12.
Note 3: All structures on separate lots will be detached and will
have a 10' minimum separation.
Note °: The lots along the south perimeter are smaller than 12,000
square feet, based on the area set-aside for future 33rd Street
right-of-way.
DECEMBER 17, 1996 97
ion
J
Notes: Please refer to item 6 in the staff report, which indicates
that 8.61 acres of private open space will be provided. Each lot
will need to maintain a minimum of 30% open space to provide the
8.61 acres of private open space that is part of the project's
overall open space area of 17.33 acres.
Based on the proposed design, staff supports the proposed waivers.
According to the applicant, the waivers provide the design
flexibilities for better organization of the improvements and the
ability to provide recreational amenities.
17. Landscaping and Buffering: There is no buffering required on
the north, east, and west perimeters, since along those
perimeters the development will meet the 150' transitional
area required in PD ordinance section 915.16 by providing
standard RS -3 lot sizes with standard RS -3 setbacks. A Type
"C" buffer with a berm and landscape feature is proposed and
will satisfy the double frontage buffer and PD south perimeter
buffer requirements. The Type "C" buffer with 6' opaque
feature will need to be reviewed and approved by staff via the
land development permit process.
18. Planning and Zoning Commission Concerns: The Planning and
Zoning Commission had two general concerns related to this
planned development. The first concern was the proposed PD
waivers' extent of departure from the RS -3 zoning lot size,
dimension, and setback requirements. The Commission expressed
reservations as to how much the RS -3 zoning criteria should be
reduced. Relating to the amount of reduction, staff explained
that, in order to provide maximum design flexibility, there is
no set "bottom line" reduction specified in the PD
regulations. In addition, staff has worked with the applicant
to ensure that all significant waivers are applied to internal
lots, and that perimeter lots generally meet the requirements
of the adjacent districts. Such waivers do not increase the
project's intensity since density and open space standards
cannot be waived for this project. Staff has explored setting
minimum design criteria in the past with design professionals.
Setting lot dimension and setback minimums, in addition to the
existing PD buffer and transition area requirements, would
reduce design and product flexibility. Use of significant
design flexibility can be seen in some of the Windsor
development, where the developer has obtained approval to
reduce the 12,000 square foot RS -3 minimum lot size to 1,000
square feet for lots interior to the project.
The Planning and Zoning Commission's second concern related to
the overall appropriateness of this type of development given
the "rural" nature of the surrounding area. While residential
development in the past has been characterized by 1/2 acre
lots based on the Health Department requirements for well and
septic tanks, the comprehensive plan and LDRs encourage higher
density where water and sewer are available as would be the
case with this development. It is staff's opinion that a
density of 3 units/acre is appropriate for a site served by
water and sewer and within one mile of a regional mall.
Based on the Planning and Zoning Commission's denial, the
applicant has prepared graphics which he believes demonstrate
the advantages to the proposed style of development. These
graphics include the proposed subdivision design with the
footprint of structures and an alternate, standard (non -PD)
single family design with houses (see attachments 5 and 7,
respectively). Also, the applicant has prepared a density
distribution graphic that depicts how density is distributed
along the perimeter of the project versus the interior of the
project. The applicant has also chosen to revise the proposed
PD plan to remove the wall feature along 33rd Street as part
of the buffer in favor of a buffer comprised of a berm and
landscape material (see attachment #8).
RECOMMENDATION:
Based on the above analysis, staff recommends that the Board of
County Commissioners grant preliminary PD plan approval and approve
the conceptual PD plan and special exception request with the
following conditions: -
DECEMBER 17, 1996 98
1.
M
That, prior to the issuance of a land development permit, the
developer shall obtain from the environmental planning section
approval of a final littoral zone planting plan.
2. That, prior to the issuance of a land development permit, all
county and jurisdictional agency permits necessary to fill the
project site's wetlands must be obtained and submitted to
planning staff.
3. That, prior to the issuance of a land development permit, the
applicant shall obtain approval from planning staff of a final
landscape plan for the Type "C" buffer along the project
site's 33rd Street frontage.
4. That, prior to the issuance of a land development -permit, the
applicant shall obtain a mining permit exemption subject to
the criteria of mining ordinance section 934.04(7)(b).
5. That, prior to the issuance of a certificate of completion for
the project, the 5' sidewalk along 33rd Street and the Type
"C" buffer along the south property line shall be constructed,
and deemed acceptable by county staff.
6. That lot open space calculations certified by a Florida
registered land surveyor as meeting the 30% open space
requirement shall be submitted with each building permit
application for each residence within the project.
7. That, prior to the issuance of a certificate of completion, a
right -turn lane shall be constructed at the project's entrance
in a manner acceptable to the county traffic engineer.__
Planning Director Stan Boling reviewed the project and advised
the Board that on the south side, the front and rear setbacks will
be reduced from 25 to 20 feet on 33rd Street. He also noted that
the Planning and Zoning Commission has recommended denial mainly
due to the degree of departure in size on the interior lots,
although staff feels the project is an acceptable one.
Chairman Adams noted that the project is similar to
Stonebridge and questioned the difference in the Planning and
Zoning Commission recommendation.
Director Boling responded that the Stonebridge project
contains 2.2 -units per acres while this project contains 2.9 units
per acres. Other differences include the fact that the interior
lots are smaller for this project. However, the outside perimeter
is completely standard except for the 33rd Street lots.
The Chairman opened the public hearing and asked if anyone
wished to be heard in this matter.
Attorney Bruce Barkett, representing the applicant, pointed
out that the adjacent property to the east is zoned RS -6 and these
lots exceed the requirements of RS -6 zoning. The plan for the 990
feet fronting on 33rd Street has been modified from a wall to a 3
foot berm with a double hedge and understory and canopy trees.
DECEMBER 17, 1996 99 '�
FAQ .
This project has 2 tennis courts, a clubhouse, and 1-1/2 acres of
green space. The applicant redesigned the lake and perimeter lots
to more nearly conform with the County's requirements.
Anthony Gervasio of 3216 62nd Court stated that he believes in
property rights but felt this project raises a compatibility issue.
His home is in the east corner of the adjacent property on the
southern boundary. He moved to this area 18 years ago because of
the beautiful family setting. There is nothing in this area that
looks even similar to this project and he urged the Board to please
not accept this project in his neighborhood. He believed that the
property to the north will also be developed like this if this
project is allowed and it does not fit into the picture of a rural
single-family home area. He believed the Board would be setting a
precedent and we would then see this all along Cherry Lane (33rd
Street).
Robert Ford of 3236 62nd Court questioned the dimensions of
the interior lots, and Director Boling advised there is a minimum
55 foot width with a 125 foot depth.
Mr. Ford felt those are very small lots and noted that the
other residents of the area had to have 15 foot side setbacks and
20 foot front and rear setbacks. He was also concerned about the
additional traffic. He stated he has been in that neighborhood for
11 years and has never been through a neighborhood with homes this
close together.
Art Weekes of 3246 62nd Court stated he was not opposing the
development, just the small lots.
Mike Rosier of 3266 62nd Court stated that he had moved from
Dixie Heights where they had 50 foot lots. He now has the largest
lot in the area and does not want to see this area become like the
one he left.
Tim Zorc of 3907 58th Circle, the builder of Hammock Lakes,
stated that from a business standpoint, if he could squeeze in some
extra lots on his project, he would certainly be able to enhance
his company's position. He also felt it is not responsible
development to over -utilize a site. He felt the concept is good
but the location is not the best.
DECEMBER 17, 1996 100
Attorney Joe Collins representing Idlewylde, stated this
developer has a long history of working with and supporting the
County and has proven they do quality work. The development as
proposed has a lake, recreation areas, tennis courts and will be a
benefit to the County and the people who will live there. The
small difference in lots is made up for by the amenities being
provided.
Dewey Walker of 6285 33rd Street felt that when a man owns
property, he ought to be able to use it, and he did not oppose the
project.
Plato Kirby of 6370 33rd Street stated he owns the 40 acres to
the north and has retained 10 acres of the property sold to the
developer for his home. He -was concerned about the neighbors but
felt this will be a quality development and would not plan to stay
in the area if he didn't think so.
Bill Gabriel of 2975 59th Avenue has lived in the area for 6
years and when he discovered Idlewylde would be the developer, he
felt encouraged that this would be an outstanding development and
would enhance his property values.
Mary Jane Freeland of 6550 52nd Avenue felt the PD ordinance
provides an opportunity to protect the environment through flexible
housing styles and recreational activities.
Attorney Barkett felt that Mr. Ford's concerns about
additional traffic have been addressed by the developer who is
putting in a turn lane on 33rd Street which is not required by the
County.
The Chairman asked if anyone else wished to be heard in this
matter. There being none, she closed the public hearing.
DECEMBER 17 1996 "i ��
101
i
MOTION WAS MADE by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by
Commissioner Tippin, that the Board grant
preliminary PD plan approval and approve the
conceptual PD plan and special exception request for
the 109 lot single-family planned development to be
known as The Sanctuary, with the conditions
recommended by staff.
Under discussion, Commissioner Tippin added that he had
reluctantly seconded the motion and noted that 15 to 18 years ago
the Board had approved zero lot lines on Johns Island, thinking
people would never pay those sums for that size property, which
then sold faster than we could count. He also noted that the State
DCA is favoring these communities.
Commissioner Ginn liked the configuration of the project with
the lake and emphasized that she had seen communities where the
zero lot line plan was beautifully done. However, there seems to
be little green space.
THE CHAIRMAN CALLED THE QUESTION and the
Motion passed unanimously.
RFP #6077 COMPUTER AIDED DISPATCH (CAM VENDORS
LOGISTIC SYSTEMS, INC. NEGOTIATIONS PURSUANT TO CCNAS
SYSTEMS CONSULTING CONTRACT WITH BARRY STROCK
CONSULTING SERVICES, INC. AND FUNDING
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of December 9, 1996:
TO: Honorable Board of County Commissioners
THROUGH: Jim Chandler, County Administrator
FROM: Doug Wright, Director
Emergency Services
DATE: December 9, 1996
SUBJECT: Ranking of Computer Aided Dispatch (CAD) Vendors
Responding to RFP #6077; Authorization to Negotiate with
Logistic Systems, Inc., Pursuant to CCNA; Approval of
Systems Consulting Contract With Barry Strock Consulting
Services, Inc.; and Funding For Consulting Services
It is respectfully requested that the information contained herein
be given formal consideration by the Board of County Commissioners
at the next regular scheduled meeting.
DECEMBER 17, 1996 102
s � �
DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS:
Subsequent to Board action on May 7, 1996, at which all CAD
proposals were rejected by the Board based on a staff
recommendation, staff received authorization to issue a second RFP
for a computer aided dispatch system (CAD) for the 9-1-1
Communications Center. The initial mailing of the second Request
For Proposals was sent to 105 potential vendors. Nineteen (19)
requested a complete package and six (6) responses were received.
The proposals received were from the following vendors:
HITECH Systems, Inc.
Los Angeles, CA
PSI International
Fairfax, VA
Logistic Systems, Inc.
Missoula, MT
New World Systems
Troy, MI
Vision Software
Wilmington, NC
Institute of Police
Technology & Management
Jacksonville, FL
After appointment of a Selection Committee by County Administrator
Jim Chandler, which consisted of members of law enforcement, Fire,
EMS, Emergency Management, 9-1-1 Data Base, and the Property
Appraiser's Office, the vendors were short listed and formal
presentation invitations were extended to Logistic Systems, PSI
International, and HITECH Systems. After consideration of the
vendors' proposals and presentations, contacts with references and
non -references, the Committee's final ranking of the firms was as
follows:
1. Logistic Systems
2. PSI International
3. HITECH Systems
It was the consensus of the Committee that possibly some vendors
had not included all components associated with a CAD system and
that once a contract was awarded, additional costs would be
experienced by the County. It was felt the proposed price, as well
as the recurring software licensing/maintenance fees and hardware
maintenance fees, are all negotiable with the potential for
reduction. Therefore, the system capabilities, vendor
qualifications, references, geofile development experience,
redundancy, past project history, and ability to deliver the system
products were the main focus of the Committee.
Authorization to negotiate with Logistic Systems is requested from
the Board. However, staff submits that a substantial level of
expertise, not available at staff level, is required to negotiate
this complex systems contract to provide a fully integrated CAD
system and geofile for use by public safety agencies.
Since the City of Vero Beach is also in the initial stages of
starting negotiations with Logistic Systems as the vendor to
provide the City with a CAD system, staff is of the opinion that
establishing two separate CAD systems is not the best approach to
take due to cost and many other reasons. The City is planning to
employ Barry Strock Consulting Associates to negotiate a systems
contract with Logistic Systems inasmuch as they, like the County,
do not have the expertise at the staff level to provide this
service.
Staff feels that there is the potential for savings to both the
City and County if a common CAD system with certain features each
entity requires, and possibly a single geofile/mapping component,
can be negotiated and purchased with the potential for cost
sharing. Therefore, staff is seeking Board approval of the
attached Systems Consulting Contract with Barry Strock Consulting
Associates, Inc., which is very similar to the City proposed
contract. The estimated cost for these services including travel
and other cost associated with carrying out the duties associated
with the contract is $10,000. However, there is the potential for
savings if the CAD Consultant could negotiate both contracts at the
same time with Logistic Systems for a common CAD system, with
features that both the City and County need, while sharing in the
consulting expense and CAD system cost.
DECEMBER 17, 1996 10 3 " ri,i9 � (� PA C II �I
ALTERNATIVES AND ANALYSIS:
The Board has given prior direction to staff to work with the City
of Vero Beach in this CAD system project in every way possible.
That has been the approach used and representatives from the City
have been present when vendors gave presentations to the County and
vice versa.
Staff is making every effort by taking the recommended approach to
protect the County from expending funds unnecessarily. Given
information received from the City of Clearwater, Barry Strock was
instrumental in negotiating a contract for them which resulted not
only in savings up front, but free hardware for several years if
Logistic Systems should change the platform used in the CAD system.
That aspect of the contract alone could result in a savings of many
thousands of dollars to the City of Clearwater. It is—these kinds
of issues that have long-term ramifications which demonstrates the
need for a person knowledgeable in systems contracting to negotiate
the contract on the County's behalf. It is estimated that it will
take approximately four weeks for the Consultant to negotiate a
contract with Logistics, Inc.
Staff from Emergency Services and the Sheriff's Office traveled to
the City of Clearwater on December 6, 1996, to review the work of
Logistic Systems on site as well as the CAD hardware and software
just before it was cut over and became active on December 8, 1996.
Staff is even more convinced now that Logistics is the leading CAD
technology vendor at this time and it was learned that the cut over
on Sunday occurred exceptionally well and the new CAD system
hardware and software are now functioning above all expectations of
the Clearwater staff. It should be noted that staff from the City
of Vero Beach had made a prior visit to the City of Clearwater for
the purpose of reviewing the CAD project and the facility.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends the Board take the following action:
1. Authorize negotiations with Logistic Systems, Inc,
pursuant to CCNA;
2. Approve the Systems Consulting Contract with Barry Strock
Consulting, Inc., estimated at $10,000, or less, which
includes travel and other costs incurred in carrying out
the duties of the contract, with funding from the
contingency fund of the 9-1-1 Surcharge budget, to
negotiate a contract with Logistic Systems, Inc., for
presentation to the Board of County Commissioners for
consideration which will include CAD system cost and
staff recommended source of funding; and,
3. Authorize staff to work with the staff of the City of
Vero Beach to achieve a common CAD system and geofile on
a cost sharing basis, to the maximum extent possible,
given the needs and unique features each jurisdiction
requires.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by
Commissioner Ginn, the Board unanimously authorized
negotiations with Logistic Systems, Inc. pursuant to
CCNA; approved the Systems Consulting Contract with
Barry Strock Consulting, Inc. with the conditions
recommended by staff; and authorized staff to work
with the staff of the City of Vero Beach to achieve
a common CAD system and geofile on a cost-sharing
basis, as recommended by staff.
CONTRACT IS ON FILE IN THE OFFICE
OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
DECEMBER 17, 1996 104
JUDICIAL RECEPTION AT COURTHOUSE - JANUARY 13, 1997
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of December 9, 1996:
Date: December 9,1996
To: Honorable Board of County Commissioners
Tbru: James E. Chandler
County Administrator
From: H.T. "SonrV' Dean, Direct
Department of General Services
Subject: Judicial Reception
BACKGROUND:
The Indian River County Bar Association is planning their traditional investitures for Circuit Judge -Elect
Cynthia Cox and County Judge -Elect David Morgan. They are scheduled for 2:00 p.m. and 4:00 p.m. on
Monday, January 13, 1997 in the Indian River Courthouse.
The Bar Association is also planning a reception following the ceremonies and Bruce Barkett, President
for the Association has requested this be held in the rotunda of the Courthouse. Refreshments are to be
catered with non-alcoholic beverages and hors d'oeuvres.
In the past, staff has been reluctant to allow foods to be served and consumed anywhere in the building
except in the designated areas. This position was designed to keep down cleaning problems with our
contracted custodial company and pest control within the building. -
Since this request to serve food is not in accordance with policy, Staff is requesting direction from the
Board
ON MOTION by Commissioner Macht, SECONDED by
Commissioner Ginn, the Board unanimously approved
Indian River County Bar Association's request to
hold their traditional investiture for Circuit
Judge—Elect Cynthia Cox and County Judge—Elect David
Morgan at 2:00 p.m. and 4:00 p.m. respectively on
Monday, January 13, 1997, in the Indian River
Courthouse, with a reception following the
ceremonies to be held in the rotunda of the
Courthouse.
WORKERS' COMPENSATION MANAGED CARE ARRANGEMENT -
CORVEL CORPORATION
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of December 10, 1996:
TO:
James E. Chandler, County Administrator
THRU:
Ron Baker, Personnel Director
FROM:
Beth Jordan, Risk Manger,/
DATE:
10 December 1996
SUBJECT: Workers' Compensation Managed Care Arrangement; Agenda Request
Staff requests consideration of the following information at the December 17, 1996, regular meeting of the Board
of County Commissioners.
DECEMBER 17, 1996 105 ' ��1K ��(� PAGE ��, �
Background
During the November, 1993 special legislative session, Florida's Workers' Compensation Law, 440 Florida Statutes,
was substantially amended. The numerous changes have become well known throughout the nation as Florida
attempted to control escalating costs through a variety of techniques. One of those cost control measures, the
Managed Care Arrangement (MCA), found in Chapter 440.134, FS, is presented today for Board action.
Analysis
One of the concerns of the Legislature was the rapidly increasing cost and utilization of medical care. While some
insurers carefully monitored these issues, others were not as diligent. Self -insurers or those with substantial self-
insured retentions, such as the County, have always been mindful of these. Nevertheless, when the legislation
ganged, all were affected. While many of the features of an MCA can be beneficial, many public risk managers
throughout the State expressed concern that the State, through its Agency for Health Care Administration, was
charging each entity a $1,000.00 filing fee to rem its compliance with the ganged law. This County, for example,
has one of the five (5) lowest experience modification, or workers' compensation loss rates, of the over 400 public
entities participating in the Florida League of Cities' excess insurance pool. There has been some discussion that
the 1997 Legislature may revisit this requirement, but the deadline for compliance, albeit without any penalty for
noncompliance, is upon us.
Effective January 1, 1997, all employers shall furnish medically necessary remedial treatment, care and attendance
solely through an MCA. For the past five (5) years, upon the recommendation of Waters Risk Management
Consultant Services, the County has worked with Insurance Servicing & Adjusting Company (ISAC) as the third party
claims administrator. Because the County's program through ISAC currently- enforces sound managed care
practices, we propose to partner through ISAC with CorVel Corporation (CorVel), an MCA offering a basic
compliance option to meet the State mandate. Through this basic option, ISAC and CorVel offer assistance with
the Application/MCA filing with the State; the preferred provider network; assistance with employee education;
education to primary care physicians; quality assurance program; MCA mandated grievance procedures; and fling
an annual grievance report to the State.
Although other corporations offer such MCA services, staff recommends that the Board approve this partnership
as best meeting the County's needs. ISAC is a long-standing partner. Additionally, CorVel has developed its own
network of participating physicians unlike some other such businesses who lease their networks from major health
insurers. You may recap that in 1991 the County entered into an ongoing contract with Gold, Vann & White, doing
business as Doctors' Clinic (Clinic), to provide primary workers' compensation care for injured County employees.
We have enjoyed.a very good working relationship with the Clinic and with the advent of the statutory change, we
wanted to continue to utilize the Clinic which is part -0f CorVel's own network. Equally important, the basic
compliance option through ISAC and CorVel is the most cost-effective way to approach this issue.
Cost for the County will be calculated as a percentage of savings gained as a result of the MCA. CorVel will be paid
23% of savings; no payment will be made if no savings are realized. The following example illustrates the
arrangement. Physical therapy billed by the provider at $50.00 is now paid according to the Florida Fee Schedule
at $28.00. Through the MCA, an additional savings of $220 will be realized, with $1.70 retained by the County and
$0.50 paid to CorVel.
The attached Letter of Agreement provides the outline for a more definitive contract to be finalized within sixty (60)
days. Staff believes this proposed arrangement with CorVel, through partnership with ISAC, provides the best
manner to meet the State mandate.
Recommendation
Staff recommends that the Board enter into an MCA with CorVel for the period January 1 through September 30,
1997, to comply with the State mandate. As staff previously advised the Board, the County's entire insurance
Program, inducing claims administration and MCA services, will be remarketed this fiscal year for the year beginning
October 1, 1997, and, therefore, this service may be provided by another corporation as a result of that remarketing
process.
Staff recommends the Board: (1) approve the Letter of Agreement with CorVel Corporation and authorize the
Chairman's signature; (2) approve the Application for Worker's Compensation Managed Care Arrangement and
authorize the Chairman's signature; and (3) authorize staff to finalize a definitive contract with CorVel within sixty (60)
days of the Board's action.
DECEMBER 17, 1996 106
ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by
Commissioner Tippin, the Board unanimously approved
the Letter of Agreement with CorVel Corporation and
the Application for Worker's Compensation Managed
Care Arrangement; authorized the Chairman to execute
these documents; and authorized staff to finalize a
definitive contract with CorVel; pursuant to
recommendations in staff's memorandum.
AGREEMENTS ARE ON FILE IN THE OFFICE
OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
DRUG-FREE WORKPLACE PROGRAM
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of December 11, 1996:
TO: James E. Chandler
County Administrator
FROM: Rosi LT. Baker
Personnel Director
DATE: December 11, 1996
RE: Drug -Free Workplace Program
BACKGROUND
Attached is a proposed change to policy regarding the Indian River
County Drug -Free Workplace, which replaces current policy
containted in Section AM -601.1 of the Administrative Policy Manual.
This policy change provides a 60 day notice to employees that drug
and alcohol testing procedures for certain current employees, and
pre-employment drug test for all job applicants will be instituted
on March 1, 1997. A copy of this policy will be provided to each
employee. _
This new policy also contains a more comprehensive program which
includes conditions requiring drug and alcohol testing of current
employees; availability of education and referral programs through
the Employee Health Nurse for assistance and rehabilitation, based
on confidentiality; and consequences involved for refusing to
submit to drug testing or after a positive result is confirmed.
RECOMMENDATION:
The Board of County Commissioners approved the attached revision to
Section AM -601.1 of the Administrative Policy Manual effective
December 17, 1996.
DECEMBER 17 1996 107 lu
114 o
ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by
Commissioner Macht, the Board unanimously approved
the revision to Section AM -601.1 of the
Administrative Policy Manual effective December 17,
1996; as recommended by staff.
SEA OAKS PROPERTY OWNERS ASSOCIATION - REQUEST TO USE
NORTH PARCEL OF WABASSO BEACH PARK FOR ACCESS TO
BEACH
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of December 11, 1996:
TO: James Chandler
County Administrator
THROUGH: James W. Davis, P.ez)�-9
Public Works Director
FROM: Jeffrey R. Tabar
Coastal Engineer J7
SUBJECT: Request Permission for Sea Oaks P.O.A. to use North Parcel of
Wabasso Beach Park for Access to Beach
RE: Letter from Sea Oaks to James W. Davis
DATE: December 11, 1996
Sea Oaks P.O.A. is requesting permission to 'use Wabasso Beach Park to access the
beach in order to construct a sand fence along their Atlantic Ocean frontage.. The fence
will be installed in January/February, 1997 and will take approximately one (1) week. A
small truck/utility vehicle will be used.
County staff recommends that the Board approve the request subject to the following
conditions:
1/ Any damage to the coastal dune line shall be repaired upon completion of
the project.
2/ All activities shall have minimum impact on native coastal vegetation and
any or
vegetation removed or damaged will be replaced.
3/ No equipment nor employee parking shall be on park property.
4/ All work shall be approved by County staff and a final inspection be
scheduled upon written notice from the contractor of the completed work.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by
Commissioner Tippin, the Board unanimously approved
the request of Sea Oaks Property Owners'
Association, subject to the conditions set forth in
the memorandum; pursuant to recommendations by
staff.
DECEMBER 17, 1996 108
L __
SEAWALLS ALONG SOUTH BEACH - UPDATE ON REQUESTS FOR
F.S. CHAPTER 161.085(3) EMERGENCY PERMITS - GERSTNER
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of December 11, 1996:
TO: James Chandler
County Administrator
THROUGH: James W. Davis, P.E .✓
Public Works Director
FROM: Jeffrey R. Tabar
Coastal Engineer /
SUBJECT: An Update on the Requests for Indian River County to
Issue F.S. Chapter 161.085(3) Emergency Permits for
Construction of Seawalls along South Beach
DATE: December 11, 1996
DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS
County staff has been monitoring the remaining requests for emergency permits in the
South Beach area between Ocean Ridge Subdivision and Bonita Beach Subdivision. The
original request consisted of eight (8) applicants represented by Thomas G. Tomasello,
P.A. (Hall, Rothwell, Bunger, Lambeth, Gerstner, Papin, Robinson and Joynson).
The Board has approved two (2) of these emergency permits in this area (Bunger and
Papin properties) and requested that County staff continue to evaluate the remaining
applicants.
As a follow-up staff has continued to monitor and evaluate the applications for
completeness and conformance with Florida Statues. County staff has conducted several
site inspections and performed beach profiles on the Lambeth and Gerstner properties.
These properties were deemed to be the most vulnerable to damage from a subsequent
frequent coastal storm. The profile data has been sent to the applicants agent and to the
Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) Bureau of Beaches and Coastal
Systems for further evaluation.
In addition to analyzing these applications for "emergency permits" County staff has also
been working diligently with the applicants on their standard FDEP Permits.
Consequently, staff has submitted a letter of no objection, to the construction of a seawall,
to the FDEP for the Gerstner property and has conformation from the FDEP that the permit
shall be issued the week of December 23, 1996.
In considering Florida Statues Chapter 161.085 (3) the only property which would be
eligible at this time to receive an "emergency permit° to construct a temporary seawall
would be the Gerstner property. However, --County staff has submitted a letter of no
objection, to the construction of a permanent seawall, to the FDEP for this property. The
State has indicated that the Gerstner permit (IR-5it) shall be issued during the week of
December 23, 1996. Therefore, considering the timely response of the State in issuing a
permit to construct a permanent structure, County staff recommends that, although eligible,
an emergency permit is not necessary to protect the private structure.
At this time no other applicants are eligible for an emergency permit, however, County staff
is committed to continuing to monitor and evaluate their applications for future
consideration.
DECEMBER 17 1996109
Chairman Adams suggested issuing the emergency permit, noting
that we will have a weather change coming and it would be prudent
for us to issue the permit. She asked if access to Wabasso Beach
is being used at the present time for construction of the wall.
Director of Public Works Jim Davis stated that construction of
this seawall will be complete by the time Sea Oaks is ready to use
the Wabasso Beach access. The contractor has been asked to wait
until both projects are complete before restoring the beach.
David Barney of 1550 Penlynn Street, (referring to the
previous item, Sea Oaks Property Owners' Association Request to use
the north parcel of Wabasso Beach Park for access to the beach)
questioned whether the County is being compensated in any way for
this access.
Director Davis stated there is a commitment by the contractor
to replace the sand and restore the dunes. However, before the
restoration work is performed, Sea Oaks will be permitted to use a
small vehicle; then when they are finished, the contractor will
restore the area.
Mr. Barney again questioned whether there is any charge to the
contractor by the County, and Director Davis again responded there
is no monetary charge. There is less impact on the native plants
and the dune line by using the existing access area for both
projects instead of creating a new one.
Mr. Barney emphasized that if he wanted to use County
property, he would have to pay for it but contractors are using the
park free of charge. He also objected to the increased parking
problems during the tourist season.
Commissioner Ginn, returning to discussion of Emergency
Permits for Construction of Seawalls along South Beach, wondered
how the Board should treat these applications in the future, and
Chairman Adams noted the workshop to be held Monday, January 20,
1997 at 7:00 p.m.
Mr. Barney questioned why the County would be granting seawall
permits prior to the workshop as once one is in place, DEP will not
require its removal.
DECEMBER 17, 1996 110
r �
Chairman Adams advised Mr. Barney that the Board had reviewed
all this information previously and suggested that Mr. Barney meet
with staff who would be happy to go over all the prior applications
and details.
Mr. Barney then questioned whether the County would continue
to grant emergency permits without any further discussion or long
term coastal management plan. He felt this is unfair to residents
as seawalls have a great impact on adjacent property.
Chairman Adams reminded Mr. Barney that citizens have a right
to protect their property. The County is trying to put together a
beach management plan and trying to work with Sebastian Inlet.
Many other alternatives have been tried and staff has put forth an
enormous effort to try to come up with solutions to the problems.
The workshop is only one effort and staff would be glad to bring
Mr. Barney up to date.
Commissioner Ginn felt Mr. Barney should know that these homes
are undermined and something has to be done to protect these
properties.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by
Commissioner Macht, the Board unanimously granted an
emergency permit to construct a temporary seawall to
Larry Gerstner and Cheryl Gerstner at 2035 Surfside
Terrace, Vero Beach.
SCHEDULING OF UTILITY WORKSHOP MEETING
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of December 11, 1996:
DATE: December 11, 1996
TO: JAMES E. CHANDLER
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
FROM: TERRANCE G. PINTO-��
DIRECTOR OF UTIII74 SERVICES
PREPARED ANA ANDERSONOLOLI
AND STAFFED PROJECT COORDINATOR
BY: DEPARTMENT OF UTILITY SERVICES
SUBJECT: UTILITY WORKSHOP MEETING
On December 10, 1996 the Board of County Commissioners discussed
the setup of a future workshop for discussion of utility matters.
Staff is now before the Board of County Commissioners to suggest
approval for the workshop to be held on Thursday, January 30, 1997,
or any date thereafter.
DECEMBER 17, 1996 111 '� - �1
The staff of the Department of Utility Services recommends that the
Board of County Commissioners select the date of January 30, 1997,
or set any date thereafter.
After discussion, CONSENSUS was reached that the Workshop
Meeting will be held on Monday, February 3, 1996 at 1:30 P.M.
RIO MAR YACHTS, INC. (OLD ARMORY BUILDING) WATER &
SEWER MAIN EXTENSION - DRIVEWAYS, INC. - FINAL PAY
REQUEST
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of December 3, 1996:
DATE: DECEMBER 3, 1996
TO: JAMES E. CHANDLER
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
FROM: TERRANCE G. PINTO
DIRECTOR OF UTILITY )ERVICES
PREPARED MICHAEL C. HOTCHKISS, P.E.
AND STAFFED ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEER
BY: DEPARTMENT OF UTILITY SERVICES
SUBJECT: ARMORY BUILDING WATER AND SEWER MAIN EXTENSION
FINAL PAY REQUEST FOR WORK AUTHORIZATION NO. 36-A.
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY PROJECT NOS. UW -95 -30 -DS AND
US -95 -31 -CS.
BACKGRni]Nn
On August 20, 1996, the Board of County Commissioners authorized
Driveways, Inc. to construct the water and sewer main to the above -
referenced project under the County labor contract. Construction of
the project is now complete and the County has been issued
clearance by the Department of Environmental Protection to start
connecting customers. The Department of Utility Services is now
requesting the Board's approval of the attached final pay request
and authorize final payment to the contractor.
ANALYSIS
The contractor was paid an initial draw in the amount of $15,119.47
for 860 of the project, less retainage. Utilities staff is now
prepared to make final payment in the amount of $2,379.94.
Originally, the Board of County Commissioners authorized a total
project cost of $54,250.00 which included $17,499.41 for labor plus
a 10% contingency (see attached meeting minutes). Since no change
orders were required for the project, the labor cost will be
reduced by $1,749.94.
RECOMMENDATION
The staff of the Department of Utility Services recommends approval
of the final payment in the amount of $2,379.94 and authorize
Chairman to execute same as presented.
DECEMBER 17, 1996
112
ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by
Commissioner Ginn, the Board unanimously approved
the final payment of $2,379.94 to Driveways, Inc.,
as recommended by staff.
LOUISIANA AVENUE WATER MAIN MAIN STREET TO CR -512) -
RESOLUTIONS I AND II
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of December 6, 1996:
DATE: December 6, 1996
TO: JAMES E. CHANDLER
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
FROM: TERRANCE G. PINTO
DIRECTOR OF UTILITY SERV �ES
PREPARED JAMES D. CHAST
AND STAFFED MANAGER OF ASS S ROJECTS
BY: DEPARTMENT OF UTILITY SERVICES
SUBJECT: LOUISIANA AVENUE WATER MAIN (MAIN STREET TO COUNTY
ROAD 512, INDIAN RIVER COUNTY PROJECT NO.
UW -96 -17 -DS, RESOLUTIONS I AND II
On November 26, 1996, the Indian River County Board of County
Commissioners approved the project for water service and authorized
the staff of the Department of Utility Services to proceed with the
design engineering work in preparation for the special assessment
project for Louisiana Avenue, between Main Street and County Road
512, to supply potable water to its residents.
Design has been completed by the Department of Utility Services
staff. We are now ready to begin the assessment process associated
with this project. (See attached agenda item and minutes of the
above meeting)
ANALYSTS -
Fifty-five (55) properties will benefit from the water line
extension on Louisiana Avenue from C.R. 512 to Main Street --
twenty-three (23) are less than .25 acre in size, thirteen (13) are
less than .50 acre, ten (10) are more than .50 acre and less than
1.0 acre, and nine (9) are greater than 1.0 acre. The Grace's
Landing parcel is 8.31 acres. Forty-three (43) of these properties
contain improvements such as homes or commercial businesses. There
are twelve (12) vacant/unimproved properties.
Attached are Resolutions I and II for the assessment project. The
total estimated cost to be assessed is $155,400.10. The estimated
cost per square foot is $0.107894.
This project is to be funded through the assessment of property
owners along the proposed water line route. In the interim,
financing will be from the assessment fund.
RECOMMENDATION
The staff of the Department of Utility Services recommends that the
Board of County Commissioners approve the attached Resolutions,
which approve the preliminary assessment roll and establish the
public hearing date.
DECEMBER 17 y a
� 1996 113 ^''�� .�,�1(( � P��f ,`'�,
91, 171
A.
,y d
ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by
Commissioner Tippin, the Board unanimously adopted
Resolution 96-162 providing for water service to
Louisiana Avenue (Main Street to CR#512), providing
the total estimated cost, method of payment of
assessments, number_ of annual installments, and
legal description of the area specifically served.
Providing (First Reso.)
RESOLUTION NO. 96-__U2
A RESOLUTION OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, PROVIDING
FOR WATER SERVICE TO LOUISIANA AVENUE (MAIN STREET TO
CR#512); PROVIDING THE TOTAL ESTIMATED COST, METHOD OF
PAYMENT OF ASSESSMENTS, NUMBER OF ANNUAL INSTALLMENTS,
AND LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF THE AREA SPECIFICALLY SERVED.
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County has
determined that the improvements herein described are necessary to promote
the public welfare of the county and has determined to defray the cost
thereof by special assessments against certain properties to be serviced by a
water main extension to Louisiana Avenue (Main Street to County Road 512),
hereinafter referred to as Project No. UW -96 -17 -DS;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, as follows:
1. The County does hereby determine that a water line shall be installed to
benefit 55 properties on Louisiana Avenue (Main Street to County Road
512), and that the cost thereof shall be specially assessed in
accordance with the provisions of Sections 206.01 through 206.09 of the
Code -of Indian River County.
2. The total estimated project assessment cost of the above-described
improvements is shown to be $155,400.10 or $0.107894 per square foot to
be paid by the property specially benefited as shown on the assessment
plat on file with the Department of Utility Services. Assessments are
to be levied against all lots and lands adjoining and contiguous or
bounding and abutting upon the improvements or specially benefited
thereby and further designated by the assessment plat with respect to
the special assessments.
3. A special assessment in the amount of $0.107894 per square foot shall be
assessed against each of the properties designated on the assessment
plat. This assessment may be raised or lowered by action of the Board
of County Commissioners after the public hearing, at the same meeting,
as required by the referenced County Code.
4. The special assessments shall be due and payable and may be paid in full
within 90 days after the date of the resolution of the Board with
respect to credits against the special assessments after completion of
the improvements (the "Credit Date") without interest. If not paid in
full, the special assessments may be paid in ten equal yearly
installments of principal plus interest. If not paid when due, there
shall be added a penalty of 1-1/2% of the principal not paid when due.
The unpaid balance of the special assessments shall bear interest until
paid at a rate to be determined by the Board of County Commissioners
when the project is completed.
S. There is presently on file with the Department of Utility Services a
plat showing the area to be assessed, plans and specifications, and an
estimate of the cost of the proposed improvements. All of these are
open to inspection by the public at the Department of Utility Services.
DECEMBER 17, 1996 114
RESOLUTION 96-162
6. An assessment roll with respect to the special assessments shall
promptly be prepared in connection with the special assessments.
7. Upon the adoption of this resolution, the Indian River county Utility
Services Department shall cause this resolution (along with a map
showing the areas to be served) to be published at least one time in the
Vero Beach Press Journal before the public hearing required by Section
206.04.
The resolution was moved for adoption by Commissioner Eggert . and
the motion was seconded by Commissioner Tigpin and, upon being put to a
vote, the vote was as follows:
Chairman Fran B. Adams Aye
Vice Chairman Carolyn K. Eggert Aye
Commissioner Caroline D. Ginn Aye
Commissioner Kenneth R. Macht Aye
Commissioner John W. Tippin Aye
The Chairman thereupon declared the resolution duly passed and adopted
this 17 day of December, 1996.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
Attest:
BY�� /a/►4 1V l_..��t��JYtV�
Fran B. Adams
JeffreD —'arton, Clerk Chairman
1 � _
ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by
Commissioner Tippin, the Board unanimously adopted
Resolution 96-163 setting a time (January 21, 1997)
and place at which the owners of properties located
on Louisiana Avenue (Main Street to CR#512) and
other interested persons, may appear before the
Board of County Commissioners and be heard as to the
propriety and advisability of constructing the water
main extension, as to the cost thereof, as to the
manner of payment therefor, and as to the amount
thereof to be specially assessed against each
property benefitted thereby.
Time and Place (Second Reso.)
RESOLUTION NO. 96- 1 Fi
A RESOLUTION OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, SETTING A
TIME AND PLACE AT WHICH THE OWNERS OF PROPERTIES LOCATED
ON LOUISIANA AVENUE (MAIN STREET TO COUNTY ROAD 512) AND
OTHER INTERESTED PERSONS, MAY APPEAR BEFORE THE BOARD OF
COUNTY COMMISSIONERS AND BE BEARD AS TO TBE PROPRIETY AND
ADVISABILITY OF CONSTRUCTING THE WATER MAIN EXTENSION, AS
TO THE COST THEREOF, AS TO THE MANNER OF PAYMENT
THEREFOR, AND AS TO THE AMOUNT THEREOF TO BE SPECIALLY
ASSESSED AGAINST EACH PROPERTY BENEFITED THEREBY.
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County has,
by Resolution No. 96- 162 , determined that it is necessary for the public
welfare of the citizens of the county, and particularly as to those living,
working, and owning property within the area described hereafter, that a
waterline be installed to serve 55 properties on Louisiana Avenue; and
�
DECEMBER 17, 1996 115 ''' - f�vt-
,;; ..0 127
Resolution 96-163
WHEREAS, it has been determined that the cost to be specially assessed
with respect thereto shall be $0.107894 per square foot; and
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners has caused an assessment roll
to be completed and filed with the Clerk to the Board; and
WHEREAS, Section 206.06, Indian River County Code, requires that the
Board of County Commissioners shall fix a time and place at which the owners
of the properties to be assessed or any other persons interested therein may
appear before the Board of County Commissioners and be heard as to the
propriety and advisability of constructing such water main extension, as to
the cost thereof, as to the manner of payment therefor, and as to the amount
thereof to be assessed against each property benefited thereby,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, as follows:
OF
1. The County Commission shall meet at the County Commission Chambers in
the County Administration Building at the hour of 9:05 a.m. on Tuesday,
January 21, 1997, at which time the owners of the properties to be
assessed and any other interested persons may appear before said
Commission and be heard in regard thereto. The area to be improved and
the properties to be specially benefited are more particularly described
upon the assessment plat and the assessment roll with regard to the
special assessments.
2. All persons interested in the construction of said improvements and the
special assessments against the properties to be specially benefited may
review the assessment plat showing the area to be assessed, the
assessment roll, the plans and specifications for said improvements, and
an estimate of the cost thereof at the office of the Department of
Utility Services any week day from 8:30 a.m. until 5:00 p.m.
3. Notice of the time and place of --this public hearing shall be given by
two publications in the Press Journal Newspaper one week apart. The
last publication shall be at least one week prior to the bate of the
hearing. The Indian River County Department of Utility Services shall
give the owner of each property to be specially assessed at least ten
days notice in writing of such time and place, which shall be served by
mailing a copy of such notice to each of such property owners at his
last known address.
The resolution was moved for adoption by Commissioner Eggert , and
the motion was seconded by Commissioner T1ppin, and, upon being put to a
vote, the vote was as follows:
Chairman Fran B. Adams Aye
Vice Chairman Carolyn K. Eggert Aye
Commissioner Caroline D. Ginn Aye
Commissioner Kenneth R. Macht Aye
Commissioner John W. Tippin Aye
The Chairman thereupon declared the resolution duly passed and adopted
this 17 day of December, 1996.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
Attest:
By Q a J& "'o
Fran B. Adams
J/effre Barton, CClle4k fc` Chairman
DECEMBER 17, 1996 116
M
DECEMBER 17, 1996 117
LOUISIANA AVE WATER MAIN / MAIN ST TO C R 512
INDIAN RIVER PROJECT NO. U W - 96 -17 - D
S
LAVM5123.WK4
J. D. C. 11-13-96
PROPERTY 1 D NUMBER
OWNER
ACREAGE
SQ. FT.
ASSESSMENT
1
06 3139 00000 0040 00009.0
INCITCO REALTY
(8.31) 2.0
87,120
$9,399.70
2
06 3139 00000 0040 00012.0
PHELPS
0.36
15,682
$1,691.99
3
06 3139 00000 0040 00013.0
MATO
0.32
13,939
$1,503.93
4
06 3139 00000 0040 00013.1
PHELPS
021
9,148
$987.01
5
06 3139 00000 0040 00018.0
CURIALE
029
12,632
$1,362.91
6
06 3139 00000 0040 00018.1
INCITCO REALTY
(3.52) 2.0
87,120
$9,399.70
7
06 3139 00000 0040 000182
CURIALE
0.31
13,504
$1,457.00
8
06 3139 00000 0040 00019.0
MORRISON
0.22
9,583
$1,033.95
9
06 3139 00000 0040 00020.0
DAY
024
10,454
$1,127.92
10
06 3139 00000 0040 00021.0
HANCOCK
0.11
4,792
$517.03
11
06 3139 00000 0040 00022.0
YATES
0.17
7,405
$798.95
12
06 3139 00000 0040 00025.0
SEB. METH CHURCH
0.19
8,494
$916.45
13
06 3139 00000 0040 00026.0
CITY SEBASTIAN
0.13
5,600
$60420
14
06 3139 00000 5000 00003.0
CUNDIFF
(10.69) 2.0
87,120
$9,399.70
15
06 3139 00000 5000 00004.0
TAYLOR
0.62
27,007
$2,913.89
16
06 3139 00000 5000 00008.1
ANDERSON
0.64
27,768
$2,995.99
17
06 3139 00000 5000 00012.0
FRANKLIN
0.30
13,068
$1,409.96
18
06 3139 00000 5000 00022.0
FINCH
0.66
28,750
$3,101.95
19
06 3139 00000 5000 00023.0
FLA POWER & LIGHT
0.57
24,829
$2,678.89
20
06 3139 00000 5000 00024.0
CITY OF SEBASTIAN
1.53
66,647
$7,190.79
21
06 3139 00000 5000 00024.1
VFW
1.48
64,469
$6,955.80
22
06 3139 00000 5000 00025.0
C FUTCH POST-1 189
(2.99) 2.0
87,120
-$9,399.70
23
06 3139 00000 5000 00027.0
PALMER
(2.71) 2.0
87,120
$9,399.70
24
06 3139 00000 5000 00028.0
O' NEILL
0.70
30,449
$3,28526
25
06 3139 00000 5000 00031.0
PALMER
0.37
16,331
$1,762.01
26
06 3139 00000 5000 00032.0
CHATHAM
022
9,520
$1,027.15
27
06 3139 00000 5000 00047.0
PALMER
0.98
42,758
$4,613.32
28
06 3139 00000 5000 00049.0
CUNDIFF
1.92
84,857
$9,155.54
29
06 3139 00005 0010 00001.0
SEB. METH CHURCH
0.13
5,663
$611.00
30
06 3139 00005 0010 00004.0
SEB. METH CHURCH
021
9,148
$987.01
31
06 3139 00005 0010 00005.0
SEB. METH CHURCH
021
9,148
$987.01
32
06 3139 00013 0001 00001.0
CITY OF SEBASTIAN
027
11,761
$1,268.94
33
06 3139 00013 0002 00001.0
CITY OF SEBASTIAN
0.36
15,682
$1,691.99
34
06 3139 00013 0003 00001.0
COLEMAN
0.33
14,375
$1,550.97
35
06 3139 00013 0003 00003.0
SIMS
0.84
36,590
$3,947.83
36
06 3139 00013 0003 00005.0
WHITE
0.70
30,492
$3,289.90
37
06 3139 00013 0003 00006.0
MARZIN
0.47
20,473
$2,208.91
38
06 3139 00013 0003 00007.0
GILLIAMS
0.98
42,689
$4,605.88
39
06 3139 00013 0003 00008.0
PALMER
0.33
14,375
$1,550.97
40
06 3139 00013 0003 00010.0
BARRON
0.32
13,939
$1,503.93
41
06 3139 00013 0003 00011.0
FLOOD
0.17
7,200
$776.83
42
06 3139 00013 0003 00013.0
WARD
0.19
8,400
$906.31
43
06 3139 00013 0003 00013.1
CASTILLO
0.19
8,400
$906.31
44
06 3139 00013 0003 00015.0
HORNE
0.30
13,068
$1,409.96
45
06 3139 00013 0004 00001.1
IND. RIVER CO.
1.81
78,844
$8,506.77
46
06 3139 00014 0070 00001.1
JUSTICE
025
10,890
$1,174.96
47
06 3139 00014 0070 000012
SNYDER
021
9,000
$971.04
48
06 3139 00014 0070 00001.4
SASSANO
021
9,000
$971.04
49
06 3139 00014 0070 00002.0
KOTELNICKI
023
10,200
$1,100.52
50
06 3139 00014 0070 00003.0
SHAW
0.23
10,200
$1,100.52
51
06 3139 00014 0070 00004.0
STONE
0.32
13,800
$1,488.93
52
06 3139 00014 0070 00004.1
HUBBARD
0.32
13,800
$1,488.93
53
06 3139 00014 0070 00005.0
PEDICO
0.17
7,405
$798.95
54
06 3139 00014 0090 00011.0
THOMPSON
0.53
23,087
$2,490.94
55
06 3139 00017 0010 00001.0
YOUNG
021
9,391
$1,01323
TOTAL SQ. FOOTAGE
1,440,306
$155,400.00
TOTAL ESTIMATED COST PER SQ. FOOT $ 0.10789373924
TOTAL ACREAGE
39.34
DECEMBER 17, 1996 117
"=^",1-^".�.",''.^^`, I ' , . ^~=.=,`=~^ '^-,^. =, ,_=`' ^` ` ''
PARCEL � 06 31 39 00000 0040 00809.0 SOFT. S/i20 ASSESSMENT 9'3?9'72
OWNER GR(ICE'S LANDING LTD,
PO BOX 3197 ====»
ANNA MARIA FL 34216-2i97
LEGAL PART OF GOV LOT A ACCORDING TO LLOYD SURVEY AS DE5CR IN
R BK 45 PP 21o, THAT PART AS DESC IN R BK 242 PP 201
PARCEL � 06 31 39 00000 0(,40 00012.0 SOFT. l51682 ASSESSHEN[ i.69i.99
OWNER PHFLPS,CAR0'E :
1053 PALMETTO AVE 1102 LOUISIANA AV
SEBASTIAN FL 32958
LEGAL PART OF GOw LOT v AS FOLL' COM AT BE CUR OF HAMILTON MICHE/'S
EN CO, RUN SLY A|'ON[WLY R/W OF FEC 180 FT, WLY 100 FT TO
LOUISIANA AVE. /H NLY ALONG LOUISIANA AVE 180 FEET TO LOT
OF HAMILTON MICHELSEN CO. TH E|'Y TO P.O.B.
PARCEL -ow- 06 31 39 00000 00*0 00013'0 SOFT. 13939 AS5E-SSHEN[ i,503-93
OWNER MAIO,FREDRICK M JR & SALLY w
773 JORDAN AVE it00 LOUISIANA AV -
SEBASTIAN FL 32958
LEGAL A POR OF LAND IN /�OV LOT 4, SEC 6-31-39'1-YING E OF LOUIS.LAN
A AVE & W OF F�CRR' BEING MORE PART DESC AS FOLL: COM AT Ski,
COP OF SAID GOv /.OT 4^ SEC 6-31-39; TH N89 DEG 59 MIN 33 SEC
W ALONG THE G LrNE OF GOV LOT 4, 95.i4 FT [O A PT UN E R/W
LINE OF L'OUI9I,�-INO, AVE; TH N 21 DEG 36 MIN 58 SEC W ALONG E
R/W LINE OF LnUIS- IANA AVE' 258.95 F[ TO F'OB ON N LINF OF
OL)' DR ROSE PR.�>P, TH CONT N 21 DEG 36 GIN 58 SEC W ALONG E
R/W LINE OF L0UJSI-AN* AVE, 12e).05 F|' TO e PT/ TH N 66 DEG
39 MIN 46 SEC E, 95.10 FT TO A PT ON W R/W LINE OF FECRR/ T
H G 21 DEG 31 MI* 02SEC E ALONG W R/W |'INE OF FECRR' 166.33
FT TO A PT ON TH,' N LINE OF OLD DR ROSE PROP/ 7H S 89 DEG 56
MIN 33 SEC W ALONG N LINE:- OF OLD DR ROSE PROP, 101.90 FT [O
POx� & ALSO INC; pOLL PCL: COM AT BE COR OF ABOVE MENT GOV /'O
T SEC 4-31-39/ THN 89 DEG 59 MIN 33 GLC H ALONG S LIME UF
SAID GOV LOT 4' p5.14 FT TO A PT ON ELY R/W LINE OF /'DUISIAm
A AVE 30 FT R/W, TH N 21 DEG 36 MIN 58 SEC W ALONG ELY 'R/W
LINE OF LOUISIoN(:, AVE, 247.47 FT TO POB/TH GDN7 N 21 DEG 36
MIN 56 SEC W ALOi4f.; THE SAID ELY R/W LINE OF LOUISIANA AVE,
1.- 46 FT TO A PT uN N LINE OF OLD DR POS.'K PROP/ TH N BF D
EG 56 MIN 33 SEC E ALONG THE -N LINE OF OLD DR ROSE PROP^
42.39 FT TO A pT� TH G 74 DEG 19 MIN 10 3EC W' 39.64 FT TO P
OB� LESS & EXCEPCOR THE FOLL' COM AT SE �R OF ABOVE �ENT
GOV LOT 4, SEC 6-31-39; TH N 89 DEC, 59 MIN 33 SEC W ALONE S
LINE OF SAID L.OT 4, 95.14 FT TO A P[ ON ELY R/W LINE
OF LOUISIANA AVE 30 FT R/W/ TH N 21 D[G 36 MIN 58 SEC W ALUH
C E R/W LINE OF LOUISIANA AVE' 250.95 FT TO A PT ON N
LINE OF OLD DR RC;SE PROP/ TH N 89 DEG 56MIN 33 SEC E ALONG N
LINE OF OLD DR ROSEPROP' 42.59 FT TO PUD/ [H CON[ Ni 89 DEC;
_ 56 MIN 33 SEC E N LINE OF OLD DR Rnsri: PROP' T,59.51. F[
TO A PT ON WLY x,'Ul LINE OF FECRR, 100 FT R/W/ TH N 21 0EG
31 MIN 02 SEC H ALONG WLY R/W LINE OF FECRR, 16.ii FT TO A
PT/ TH S 74 DEG 1.9 MIN i0 SEC W, 55.67 Fr [O PUB.
"=^""^"^ - =`.`,..-,~,`~.`""`,`W A - . A-* *.--1 "', - - A -A-^-``~ ,` '.
PARCEL � 06 31 39 00000 0040 00013.1 SOFT. Yi*W ASSESSMENi po�'Oi
OWNER PHELPG"CAROL M
1053 PALMETTO AVF ====»
~~'---'''
��-
���/�nm FL 32958
LEGAL PART OF GOV LOT 4, BEING A PARCEL LYING BETWEEN F[CRR ON E &
LUSISIA#A AVE ON W' DESC AS FOLL: DE*G AT BE COR HAMILTON
MICRELSON CO, RUk SLY ALONG WLY R/W FEC/+R 180 FT TO POB,
Tl --1 CONT SLY AiONG WLY R/W 96.98 FT, TH WLY TO E R/W LINE
LOUISIANA AVE 95-09 FT, TH MLY ALONG E R/W LINE 97.00 FT, T
H ELY 94.55 TO p�B
DECEMBER 17, 1996
118
PARCEL # 06 31 39 00000 0w40 00018.0 Sur -T. 1�632 ASSESSMENT 1^:-'%62-91
OWNER CURIALG.JOHN T
1061 LOUISIANA wv
SEBASTIAN FL 32958
LEGAL A PARCEL OF LAND LYING IN GOV LOT 4 MORE PART DESC
AS FOLL: COM AT SE COR OF ABOVE MENTIONF--*D GOV LDT 4, lH N
89 DEC, 43 MIN 33 SEC W ALONG S LINE OF SATO GOV LDT 4^ 12i.
48 FT TO WLY R/W LINE OF LOUISIANA AV 30 FT R/W' TH m 22
DEG l9 MIN 00 OEL w ALONG WLY R/W LINE OF I'OUISIANA AV 74.9
9 FT TO POB, TH N 89DEG 48 MIN 40 SEC W 1.15-0 FT TO A PT' TH
S 00 DEG 04 MIM *6 SEC W S.O FT TO A Pr^TH N 89 DEC, 48 MIN 4
0 SEC W 74.01 rT TO A PT, TH N 00 DEG 50 MIN 34 GITC W 66.44
FT TO A PT, TH N 7J. DEC. 43 MIN 29 SEC E 40.25 FT TO A Pr, rH
S 89 DEG 24 MIii ?5 SEC E i22.88 FT TO A PT ON WLY R/W LIN�
OF LOUISIANA #V' 7H S 22 DEGY 19 MIN 00 SEC E ALONG WLY R/W
LINE OF LOUISIANA AV76.il FT TO POB
PARCEL. # 06 31 39 00000 0040 OOOtB.i S(klR. 87120 ASSESSMENT' 9'399'72
OWNER INCITCO REALTY INC,
PD BOX 430 ====>
VERO BEACH FL 32961-0430
LEGAL BEING A PART]]F 6OV LOT 4 SEC 6-31-39 BEING MOWK PART DESC
AS FOU-' COM AT INTERSECTION OF S /'IWE OF GOV LOT A & NE
COf, OF SWi/4 OF SEC 6, RUN W ALONG S i'INF OF SAID GOV LOT
4 335.43 FT TU POB'TH N i DEG 14 MIN 1.5 SEC W 127.34 F7'
TH N 74 DEG 34 MIN 33 SEC E 40.1.9 FT, 7HN 8) Dl::,C 44 MIN 39 S
EC E 122�9 FT [O W R/W LINE OF LOUISIANA AVE, TH N 21 ()E�
40 MIN 27 SEC W ��ONG SAID R/W -28.20 FT TO �E COR OF DE�?'C /..A
ND RECORDED IN DDK 58 PP 37E3, [H N 89 l7 MIN 4�: SEC W
#LDNG 6 LINE OF 12AID DBK i82.0 FT' TH N A}'DNG W LlNE OF SATD
Dl*;K 43.00 FT, Th. 'Al 681.0� FT, TH S 2�.(,,.00 FT TO S LINE OF
GOV LOT 4, SAID COR BElNi-x 283.87 FT E OF '/W COR OF GOV LOT
4' TH E ALONG Sp.ID S LINE 7i4.57 FT I -'ACK T0 P0B (Oc BK 673
PP 2214)
""-IV lVir It jvk-;� w°��lv.3v7v"=w='~.,~^"�P.,,`.'``^.W'.".°`=71°`",`°;� '"` -`1�,,~.^^~ ^' .`
PARCEL 06 3i39 00000 0040 00018.2 SQPT. 13504 ASSESSMENT' 1'4`.`;'7'00
OWNER CURIALE,JOHN T
1061 LOUISIANA AV ====» J.06t L13UIsIANA AV
SEBASTIAN FL 32958
LEGAL A PARC OF LAND LYING0 IN GOV LOT 4 BEING MDR[ PART DESC AS FO
U-: COM AT SE COF OFABOVE MENTIONED GOV LOT 4' TH N 89 DEG
43 MIN 33 SEC W A/-ONG S LINE OF SAID GDV|'UT 4, 121.*8 FT TO
PUB ON WLY R/W LINE OF LOUISIANA AV 30 FT R/W, TH CONT N 89
DEG 43 MIN 33 2EC W ALONG S LINE OF SAIDG-OV LO[ 4' 216^60 FT
TO A PT, TH N 00 DEG 50 MIN 34 GEC W 60.97 FT rO A PT, TH
S 89 DE[ 48 MIN 40 SEC E 74.01 FT TO A PT' TH N O() DEG 0-1 M
IN 46 SEC E 8.0 FT TO A PT, TH S 89 DEG 48 MIN 40 SEC E
1i5.0 FT TO w PT ON WLY R/W LINE OF LOUISIANA AV, TH S 2
2 DEG 19 MIN 00 SEC E ALONG WLY R/W LINE OF LOUISIANA AV
74.99 FT TO POB
»*»w*»*mx*»w****+»**»**»******
PARCEL � 06 31 39 00000 OC40 00019.0 SOFT. 9583 ASGESSMEN[ i'033'94
OWNER MORRISON'SAMUEL F & GAYE S
274 MAIN 5T
SEBASTIAN FL 32958
LEGAL N 80 FT OF S 130 R OF GOV 0T 4, LYING LA AVE & W OF R
/W OF FECRR & ALF -AU INC FOLL DESC PARC; COM AT SE COR OF G]V
LOT 4^ TH N 89 DEG 59 MIN 33 GEC W ALONGS LINE OF GOV LOT 4,
95.i4 FT TO A Pr ONE R/W OF LA AVE, 11-1 N 21 DEG 36 MIN 58
SEC W ALONG E R/W LINE OF LA AVE 131.59 FT TO A Pr' TH N 6/3
DEG 48 MIN 25 SEC E 20.98 FT [O POD, TH CON[ N 68 DEC, 48 Mr.N
25 SEC E 73.63 F7 To A PT ON W R/W LINE ']F FECRR. TH S 21 oE
G 31 MIN 02 SE'- E'� ALONG W R/W LINE OF FECRR 28.,")3 FT TO A
PT, TH N 89 DE� 59 MIN 33 GEC W 79.i6 FTTD POB
DECEMBER 17 1996
�
UL
119
4
���� 1:2�
PARCEL WO 06 3l 39 00000 0»0-40 00020.0 SOFT. 10454 ASSESSMEN[
OWNER CRIPPEN,STANDISH p JR & BECKY L
PO BOX 278 ====> 1.043 LOUISIANA AV
mosELAND FL 32957
LEGAL A POR OF LAND IN GOV LOT w^ SEC 6-3i-39,L.YING E OF LOUISIANA
AVE & W OF FECRR' BEING MORE PART DLSC AS FOLL: COM AT SE
CDf� OF SAID GOV |'UT 4' GEC 6-31-39/ T|/ N09 0EG 59 MIM 33 SEC
W ALONG G LIN[ OF GOo LOT *' 95.i4 r7 TO A PT ON E R/W
LINE OF LDU%SIANP AVE; TH N 21. DEC, 36 MIN 58 GEC W ALONG E
R/W LINE OF LOUTS- IANA AVE' 131 .59 FT TO f OB/ TH CONT N 21
DEG 36 MIN 58 SF[W ALONG E R/W LINE UF LOU[GIANA AVE, 127.3
6 FT TO A PT/ r1.1 H 89 DEC 56 MIN 33 E' 101.9 F[ TO PT
ON W R/W LINE OF FECRR; TH S 21 DEG 31 MIN 02 SEC E ALONG W
R/W LINE OF Fl::.CRR' 90.62 FT TO A PT; [H S 68 DEG 48 MIN 25
SEC W, 94.61 Fr TO POB & INC FOLL PCL' COM AT SE COR OF ABO
VE MENT GOV LOT A^ SEC 6-31-39/ TH N 89 DEG 59 MIN 33 SEC W
_ ALONG S LINE OF --AID GOV LOT 4, 95.l4 FTTO A P[ ON ELY R/W /
INE OF LOUISIANA AVE30 FT R/W/ TH N 31. DEG .36 MIN 56 SEC W
ALONG ELY R/W LIN: -K OF LOUISIANA AVE, 258.95 FT TO A PT ON
N LINE OF OLD DR ROSE PROP/ TH N 89 D[f' :�;6 MIM 33 GEC E
AL[/NG N LINE OF CA -D DR ROSE PROP, 42.�19 F[ [O PDF.i; TH CONT w
89 DEG 56 MIN 3Z SEC E ALONG N LINE OF O/ -D DR ROSE PROP'
59.51 FT TO A PT ON WILY R/W LINE OF FFCRt00 FT R/W; TH N 21.
DEG 31 MIN 02 3E[ W ALONG THE WILY R/W LINE OF FECHR' 16.1i
FT TO A PT/ TH S 74 DEC 19 MIN iO SEC W,55.�7 FT TO POB/ & L
ESS & EXCEPT F-11_1. DESC PCL:COM AT SE COR OF ABOVE MENT GOV
LOT 4, SEC 6-31.-,69/ TH N 89 DEG 59 MIN 33 SEC W ALONG S LTN
E OF SAID GOV L.Ol 4'95.14 FT TO A PT ON ELY R/W LINE OF LOU-
ISIANA AVE 30 -,T R/W/ TH N 21 DEG 36 MlN58 /7,EC W A|'0NG ELY R
/W LINE OF LOUlS[ANAAVE' 247.47 FT TO PUD; [H CONT N 21 DEG
.3c, n�.* �Jk;� ~ ,..'"'`^ Ci"^4, V.1-1 ``/w L_kwL Jr .'u����«�~. �*^� ' — ^^
.40 FT TOA PT ON LINE OF OLDDR ROSEROSEPROP; rH N 89 DEG
MIN 33 BEC E ALONG N LIME OF OLD DR ROSEPROP' '`
^ �2.�9 FT O -~
PT/ TH S 74 DEG 19 MIN 10 SEC W^ 39.64 FT Fa PDB~
PARCEL ®r 06 31 39 00000 0040 00021.0 SOFT. 4792 ASSESSMENr 5i7-02
OWNER HANCDCN,AGNE5
l040 LOUISIANA AVE ====» 1040 LOUISIANA AV
SEBAST-TAN FL 32958 -
LEGAL S 50 FT OF S 5 A OF E 3/4 OF LOT 4, E OF LA, AVE AS D BK 10t
, PP 309
PARCEL � 06 31 39 00000 0640 00022'0 SOFT. ?405 AS5ESS1E1-1T 798'95
OWNER YAlES,MELVIN EARL & MILDRED L
7591 SW 36TH Sl ====> 1065 LOUISIANA AV
MIAMI FL 33155
LEGAL PART OF LOT 4 AS 1N D BK 53 PP 378 & R BK 67 PP 197
PARCEL 0 06 31 39 00000 0040 00025.0 SOFT. O494 ASBESSMEN[ 91.6.45
OWNER SEBASTIAN METH CHURCH INC.
PO BOX 780328 ====>
SEBASTIAN FL 32978-0328 '
LEGAL BEG AT SE COP 0F LOT 5, BLOCK i OF S01001- PARK S/D, RU
N 8ELY ALONG W LINE OF LOUISIANA AVE.TO INT'�RGECT W1TH N
LINE OF PALMErTD AVE' RUN SWLY ALONG N |'IN[-:: OF PALMETTO AVE
TO SE COR OF LOr 3J OF A G ROSE SUB;m]N NH|'Y IALONG E LINE O
LO7 32 OF A G �'!O"mE SUB TO SW COp OF LO[ 5, BLK 1 OF SCHOOL
PK SUE'l/ RUN NE: Y ALONG S LINE OF LOT 5 B/'K i OF SCHOOL Pu
SUB TO P.O.B. ([1N BK 482 PP 719 TO 72�5)
PARCEL 0 06 3J 39 00000 0o40
OWNER CITY OF SEBASTIAN,
1225 MAIN S[
SEBASTIAN
LEGAL BEG WHERE PALM!TTrO
ALONG S LINE oil:--
THENCE
FTH[NCE SLY ALt}NC E
TO LA AVE iOO /'T [O
LESS Rf AS D Bk i P
DECEMBER 17 1996
00026.0 SQPT. �600 ASSESSMENT 604.20
FL 32958
AVE INTERSECTS W L.TNE OF FEC RR' RUR WLY
PALMETTO AVE' TO E i. -INE OF L.A. AVE 100 FT
LIME OF LA AVE 90 FTELY AT RIGHT ANGLE.G
RR R/W/ NLY ALONG W 1 -INE OF RY TO BE(�
F` fL96
PARCEL 0 06 3i *,�9 00000 5(',00 00003.0 SOFT, 8/i2o ASSESSMENT 9,]l?9.72
OWNER TUERK,GEORGE R (+0*x) &
C/O PO BOX 3280 ====>
VERO BEACH FL 32964-3280
OWNER STREETMAN,GEORGE H (25%)
OWNER MACWILLIAtM,ALEX ./R (25Y)
OWNER M#CWILLIAM,ALEk 111 (10%)
LEGAL NEi/4 OF SWiy4 LYING W OF LOUISIANA AV' L:*XC/zPTING THEREFROH
THG SOUTH 534.150 FT,& ALSO EXCEPTING THEF|EFXOM LANDS DEEDE()
- TO FOSTER' GRE[N' CATO. kELSO & BAPTIST' /`HU/�CH (0;1.' BK 452 PG
679) & LESS FULL DESC PROPERTY: FR 6E COR OF/4 OF S|�
1/4*DF SEC 06 -Zi -39, RUN N 00 DEG OO i1IN0t .:)F-..0 E' 74O.i2 F|
TO POB OF FOLL DL5C PROP' TH G 89 DEG 1t MIN Oi SEC 1A, 290.V
FT; TH N 00 DE� 5/ MIN 40 SEC W. 307.03 FT; TH N 89 DEG 44 M
IN 1* SEC E' 2p5.13 FT, TH S 00 DEG 00 MIN Oi yEC W^ 304.73i
FT TO POB, LESS /HE ELY 15.0 FT FOR LOUISIANA Av.
^^-.""^°=^°"^n".^`,~^='",°="`°"^°.jv~="''It^,^^""~^-,°,,`'`" `-- '^
PARCEL # 06 31 39 00000 5000 00004^0 SOFT. 27007 ASSESSMENT 2,9t�.89
OWNER T#YLDR,E W &
1053 LDUI8AN# AVE ====} 1053 LOUISIANA #V
SEBASTIAN FL 32958
OWNER PFENNIWGER'JOHN JR
LEGAL BEG 109 FT W DF NE COR OF SWi/4 IN CEN OF LA. AVE FOR P.Q.
B. RUN W ON N LINE ONEi/4 OF SWi/4 212 FT, S i70 FT' E 267
Fl TO CEN OF LA AVE NWLY ALONG CEN OF LAVE TO P.O.B. LESS T
O ROSE ET AL
PARCEL
� 06 31 39 00000 5000 00008^i SOFT. 2/768 ASSESSMENT
2,996.00
OWNER
Ah0ERSON,FRED W & CINDY
PO BOX 815 ====> J-001. FOSTER N0
RDSELAND FL 32957-0615
LEGAL
COM AT SE CDR OF NE1/4 OF SWt/*.RUN N 740.12 FT.TH W 15.0
FT TO W WW OF LOUISIANA AVE TD r/lH,TH CONT W 178.0 Fr,
TH S 156.0 FT,rH E 1.78.0 FT,TH N 156.0 Fr ('D POP (OR BK 740
PP 2609)
»**»**"»*�**»***
PARCEL
nor- 06 31 39 00000 5O00 000i2.0 SOFT. 13068 A8SESSMEN[
1'*O9-95
OWNER
FRANKLIN'RUBY B 'LE)(779/29i)
PO BOX 396 ====> 1033 uJVISIwNA AV
FELL9MERE FL 32948-0396
OWNER
FREDELL,BERT%E
OWNER
HDLLAND'EDNA
LEGAL
COM AT NE COR OF NEi/4 OF SWi/4~ RUN W 1.24 FT MORE OR LESS'
TO W R/W OF LA AvE^ TH RUN SELY 201-00 FT MORE OR LESS TO
POE, TH RUN W ��6:� Fl, TH S 75 FT' TH E 180 FT MORE OR LESS
TO E R/W OF LA AVE, TH NWLY TO POB' (OR BK 61.6 PP 21i64)
PARCEL
� 06 34- 39 00000 5000 00022.0 SOFT. 28750 ASSESShEN[
3^10i.95
OWNER
SHUTTLEWORTH,JUD]TH CAROLYN
909 LOUISIANA AV ====> 909 LOUISIANA AV
SEBASTIAN FL 32958
LEGAL
A PARC OF LAND LYlN� IN SW 1/4 MORE PARTDESC AS FULL:COM A[
SE COR OF NE i/« OF SW i/*. TH W 15 FT TO W R/W LINE OF LA
AVE', TH S oO DEG -1�i MTN 20 SEC W 16.75 Fr ALONG W R/W LINFK
OF LA AVE TO PDB^ THS 00 DEG 41 MIN 20 GEC u A[-OM� W R11A)
LINE OF LA AVE iO4.24 FT TO A PT ON N i'IN:::: OF* ORANGE HGT�7
UNIT i, AS IN PRT 7-49' r|/ S 89 DEC, 53 MIN 20 SEC W ALONG N
LINE OF SAID O;'<A#GE HGTS UNIT i' 290.65 FT [O A PT' TH N VV
DEG 41 MIN 20 SE[ E 64.64 FT TO A PT' TH N Q9 DEG 53 MIN 20
SEC E 40.28 FT TC # PT, TH N 00 DEC, 45 MIN 26 SEC E 39.25 F
T TO A PT, TH N E --!v DEG 48 MIN 24 SEC E 250.33 FT TO POB ON
W R/W LINE OF L.A AVE
DECEMBER 17� 1996
�
��
121
At ° .~"`' `^"'^
PARCEL 06 31 39 00000 5000 00023.0 SOFT. 24829 ASSESSMENT 2'�,,8'*0
OWNER FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT CO,
ATT'PROPERTY TAX DEFT
PO BOX 14000 ====^
JUNO BEACH FL 33408-0420
LEGAL 1.5 A IN SWi/4. l` BK 17^ PP 236
PARCEL. 0 06 31 39 00000 5('00 00024.O SOFT. 66647 ASSESSMENT 7,190'81
OWNER CITY OF S2BASTIAi^^
1225 MAIN ST 100 V[TERANS MEMORIAL WAY
SEBASTIAN FL 32958
LEGAL 7.5 A IN SWi/4, I` BK 3' PP 279 LESS E 285 FT OF S 433 FT T
HEREOF & LESS N 267.25 FT AS MEAS//RED #/'DNG RR R/w AS
PER OR B1< 708 Pp 8i9
PARCEL 0 06 3l 39 00000 5(X)0 00024.i SOFT. 64469 ASSESSMENT 6.955'81
OWNER' VE�S OF FOREIGN wARC PST 10210'
815 LOUISIANA AVE ====) Ei5 LOUISIANA AV
SEI!ASTIAN FL 32958
LEGAL ALL THAT LAND LYING IN SE 1/4 OF SW 1/4 DESCRIBED AS FOLLuW
S: BEGINNING A[ 11E. COM AT GE COR OF 13E1/4 OF �Wi/4 RUN N
690 FT MORE OR LESS, TH W TO A PT ON W R/W OF LOUISIANA AVE
& ELY R/W OF n�' THS 00 DEG 35 MIN 32 SEC H 221.�8 FT TO
KNOWN AS LOUISIANA AVENUE; THENCE, ON A DEFLECTION ANGLE OF
90 DEG 17` TO THE P.O.B. TH S 00 DEG 35 M[# 59 SEC W 45.99
FT, TH S #O DE(; 4.1. MIN 20 SEC W 209.94 Fr, TH N 89 DEG 31 M
IN 40 SEC W 68.7p' FTTH S 89 DEG 33'MIN 00 S17C W 141.2i FT'
ON A DEFLECTION ANGLE OF 89 DEG 43' TO lR< LEFT RUN 210.00
FEET SOUTHERLY »N ATH 5 89 DEG 30 MIN 00 S�C W 3.64.91 rT'
TH N 38 l»EC 42 M1N 4i SEC E 267.25 FT, [H y 89 DCG 23 MIN i
8 SEC E 141.65 Fi TH N 00 DEG 35 MIN 32S/7C W 46.60 FT,
TH S 89 DEG 34 MIN 28 GEC E 68.60 FT TO P.O.B. (OR BK 708 PP
8z9)
PARCEL. 0 06 3i 39 00000 5�00 00025.0 SOFT. 8/i20 ASSESSMENT 9'*�99 72
OWNER CHARLES L FUTCH pOGT NO 189, ^
PO BOX 153 ====» 607 LOUISIANA Au
sE8ASTIAN FL 32958
LEGAL LOT 300 FT BY 30[ F7' IN SE CDR -OF SWi/4 AS IN D HK 50' PP �
' LESS RD R/WS & CHEGSER/ & ALSO LUr 133 FT N * G BY 300
FT E & W IN SE3..4 OF SW 1/4 AS D BK 87 PP 75
PARCEL 0 06 Zi 39 00000 5000 00027'0 SOFT. 87120 ASSESSMENT
OWNER P#LMER,GREGORY
PO BOX 780295 LOUISIANA AV
SEBASTIAN FL 32978-0295
LEGAL COM 15 FT W OF SE CDR OF NE1/4 OF SWi/4 RUN N 154.4/4 FT' TH
M 89 DEG 05 MIN W 191 FT TO POB, TH N 09 DEG 05 MIN W 594
FT' TH N 189.42 FT, TH S 89 DEG 05 MIN E785 FT TO W R/W OF L
# AVE. TH S 30 FT ALONG W R/W OF LA AVE, [H N 89 DEG 05
MIN W 191 FT. TH S 1.59.42 FT TO POB
PARCEL 40 06 31 39 00000 5000 00028.0 SOFT. 30449 ASSESSMENT 3 285 26
OWNER D'NEIU-,CAROL JANE & ' ^
7403 HILLSIDE DR ====v LOUISIANA MY
FREDERICK MD 21702
OWNER PALMER,ELIZABETH T
LEGAL COM 15 FT W OF Si.'- CDR OF NEi/4 OF SWl/4 RUN N i54.411 FT TO
'
OB. TH N 89 DEG 05 MIN W 191 FT, TH N i.-'-9.42 FT, TH S 89
DEG 05 MIN E ipt FT TO E H/W OF LA AVE' TH ':,) 159.42 FT TO PO
8 (OR BK 632 PP 2993)
PARCEL. '. 06 31 39 000�00 5000 00031.0 SOFT. t6331 ASSESSMENT i 7�� 0i
OWNER PA|'MER,GREGORY B ' ^
PO BOK 780295 LOUISIANA #V
SEBASTIAN FL. 32978-0295
LEGAL COM 15 FT W OF ES;!* COR OF NEi/4 OF SW1/4'RUN N 343 G� FT TO P
OB, TH W 136 F[, TH N 120^08 FT' TH E 1.3, -.)FT TO E^R/W OF LA
AVE, TH S ALOwI�T' W LINE OF SAID R/W i2A.08 FT TO POB (DR
-
BK 522 PP 978/ ' -
��� �� �� ����
~~~~`~~~`~~~~^�� �^' ���~" 122
PARCEL 0 06 31 39 00000 5u00 00032'0 SLIFT. 7520 ASSESSMENT
OWNER [HATHAM'JOAN�C
94'5)9�LOUISIANA ;'lV[ ====» 945 U}UISIANA AV
SEBASTIAN FL 32958
LEGAL COM 15 FT W OF SE COR OF NEi/4 OF SWi/4'RUN N 463.94 FT TO P
OB' TH W 136 Fr' TH N 70 FT, 7H E 136 FT TO W R/W OF LA AV�
TH S 70 FT TO pOB [N (-< BK PP i95
***** X N -11r, 'k*)t' ***')t
PARCEL. �063i39 00000 50,00 00047.0 SOFT. 4'_*?758 ASSEISSNEN[ 4'613.33
OWNER FA|JMER,TAMARA cA\lE & ELIZABETH
917 LOUISIANA AVE 9i7 LOUISIANA AV
SEBASTIAN FL 32958
LEGAL A PARC OF LAND LYING IN SW 1/4' MORE PAR[ DESC AS FOUL: C
OM AT GE COR OF NE 1/4 OF SW 1/4, TH W IS FT [O W R/W LIN:::'
OF LA AVE, TH y OV DEG 41 MIN 20 GEC W l6^'/5 FT ALONG W R/W
LINE OF LA AVE TO POB, TH S 89 DEC 413 MIN 24 SEC W 250.33
— FT TO A PT, TA N 00 DEG 45 MIN 26 SEC E 17t.03 FT TO A ,`T. T
H N 89 DEG 44 MIM 40 SEC E 250.13 F[ TO A PT ON W R/W LINE
OF LA AVE^TH S 00 DEG 41 MIN 20 SEC to ALONG W R/W LIN!'7, OF
LA AVE 17i.30 FT rO PO}/
����A R,,*","—W,-'`,`'`'s, It t- ^''`�°,`.```.`
PARCEL ®r 06 31 39 00000 5000 00049.0 SOFT. 84857 A8SESSHE#r 9^i55.56
OWNER WRIGHT,JACN F .]R (TRS) &
FBO WILLIAM F CUNDIFF FAMILY 1.023 LOUISIANA AV'
TRUST 1023 LOUISIANA AV
t18 8 POLLARD ST 1023 LOUISIANA AV
VINTOW VA 24179
OWNER MUSSELWHITE'BILLIE SUE (TRS)
OWNER BROWN,ANNE (TRS)
OWNER LOG#w^JACKIE (rRS)
LEGAL COM AT SE COR OF HEI/4 OF SWi�4, RUN N 740.12 FT. TH W TO W
R/W OF LA AVE. SA1DPT BEING TRUE PDB, TH S 89 DEG 11 MIN 01
SEC W 275 FT, [H N 0 DEG 57 MIN 40 SEG W.307^l3 FT' TH N 89 D
EG 44 MIN 14 SEC E 280.13 FT TO W R/W OF LA AVE, TH S
304^31 FT TO POB ([R BK 641 PP 343)
PARCEL � 06 31 39 00005 001.0 00001'0 SOFT. �663 AS5ESSMEN[ 61i.00
OWNER SEBASTIAN METH CHURCH INC.,
PO BOX 780328
SEBASTIAN FL 32978-0328
LEGAL RE[`LAT OF SCHOOL PK SUI; PBI 2}29 LOT i 9LK i
PARCEL � 06 31 39 00005 0010 00004.0 SOFT. 9148 ASSESCMENr 987.0l
OWNER SEBASTIAN METH CHURCH INC'
PO BOX 780328 ====>
SEBASTIAN FL 32978-0328
LEGAL REpLAT OF SCHOOL PK SUB PBI 2)29 LOT 4 BLK i
PARCEL 4ur- 06 31 39 00005 0OtO 00005'0 8OFT. ?148 ASSESSHEN[ IM7.0i
OWNER SEBASTIAN METH CHURCH INC,
PO BOX 780328 ====>
SEBASTIAN FL. 32978-0328
LEGAL REPLAT OF SCHOOL PK SUB PBI 2}29 LOT 5 BLK i
PARCEL lw- 06 31 39 00013 0001 0000i.0 SOFT. 11761 ASSESSMENT i,768'94
OWNER CITY OF SEBASTIAN,
1225 MAIN GT ====> LOUISIANA AV
SEBASTIAN FL 32958
LEGAL W A MARTINS SUn rBS 3}i2 ALL BLK A
��
���
DECEMBER �'' �°',~,
123
uK�
�9(•y4 St•if•ai•�>t #at•3t �•iFit•9t•96ii 3E 1�ii �:('•x•ii• .i•at••r.•# 1t•fi•9E#•N ##ar•.it•7Ea(•dtdt•9t•a@� �•?6•Nrit )43@t t••>t •lE :k tt••Tt• ii•� dF+•t �(•Bt••it #at• H Ai•a4 t(•'1t••1t• }(••?(^( �3@ :w• N L• •:i it
PARCEL. 06 31 39 00013 0002 00001..0 SGFT. t::�h5'.� ASr.. ES" MEH f
OWNER CITY OF SEBASTIAN,
12:5 MAIN ST ' _--_> 5.032 LOUISIANA AV
SEBASTIAN FL 3 950
LEGAL W A MARTINS SUB F'BS 3)12 BEG 300 FT S 6 i5 FT E OF NW lwOF: 0
F GOV LOT 6, RUN s TW LIN'r."•: OF FEC RY ti/ W, NWLY 153 FT, -iU'd W
TO ANCHOR BOLT, RUN S TO P.O.B.; F'AR'(' 013LK B & C, W A MAR I' I
NS SUB D BK 26 F'F' 267
ata',-' n A-•rc K ac a; xae Hti: aeaC 7t :: at 7r •t at at .:a:-.,:.:.na:-rcat r: 7Cr: ,r xaV :r. ar yr.•.: :K•::•.-;gi n.:•a+: a.1Cat ,t•N•Y•. ,. .'C 3t 7t••t.•y 1t .IS• t..
PARCEL T 06 31 39 00013 0003 00001.0 SOFT. 14375 ASSs.SSMEN t'
OWNER COLEMAN,LOUISE (i/3)(H)*6
C/O ALICE CHESTER ____> 1024 LOUISIANA AV
1060 FACE DR NW 1024 L:IUISIANA AV
PALM BAY FL 32987
OWNER ASHBURNER,HERBERt E (1/3) _
OWNER CHESTER, ALICE
LEGAL W A MARTINS SUS{ FBS 3-12 BEG 400 FT S & i5 1.7 IC OF NW COR OF
LOT 6, RUN E 9.5-'l*- FT MORE OR LESS TO W R/W OF F -C RY, RUN
NLY 139.5 FT, kl,li•; W 21 DEG S 95 FT MORE UR LESS TO E LINE OF
LA AVE, RUN S i00 FT TO P.O.B., PART OF Bl..K C, W A MARTIN
SUB
�ac•�ta(•a�a� ��•x-�•�� � •x••>Fat et•��•�•�c � a�,r•tt :;..,� x as•�•ar• •x•�at••�e �t �• �! at•�i u ae �(•� >F•x :c >Fat ,� at••tt .i••� � tt •�•x••.i•i(••x at•3i•at' +�� x :c atnae•� ,ra�•��: -x• u �•;t•
PARCEL. a 06 31 39 0005.3 Oi:iO3 00003.0 SOFT. 36590 ASSERI: MEN'T 3, 947.84
OWNER SIMS, LILLIAN JI :WELL
1016 S LOUISIA'NA - .-.__> 1016 LOUISIANA AV
SEBASTIAN FL 32958
LEGAL W A MARTINS SU 1 l' -OS 3-12 FART OF' BLK C:, MORE FART DESC AS F -O
LL: BEG AT A PT ON E LINE_ OF LOUISIANA AVE 400 FT S OF N
LINE OF LOT 6, 71-01, S 200 FT, TH E 222.8 FF T'0 W R/W OF FEC: R
R, TH N 22 DEG W ALONG W LINE OF FEC RR 214 FT, TH W 1.4.3
FT TO POD (OR BK 46.E PP 978 )
�•�c•�c� x•�s •x •��•� �c at•: �t•�t•at••x �•�c •��•ac �i•� �•x•�;•a(• iea�•as•a�•x ;e sae �t•�at• x at•at•�c � x ac ac : r.•:c x ne sF;c ae•�ae•it a� tt• u � x• 3,; �� ac at•a�• x •tt•',� u ac � x at•at• � ac• ::t••tt•
PARCEL l 06 3i 39 00013 0003 00005.0 SOFT. ;3f}49:i AjSSESSMEN(' 3,:229.90
OWNER WHITE:, AROL E=: 1,41-.' & JUDITH ANN
1004 LOUISIANA A%t < ._=) 1004 LOUISIANA AV
SEBASTIAN FL 3295E
LEGAL W A MARTINS SU :s F•:CIS 3 )12 N 125 FT OF FOUL BEG 600 FT S &
iS FT E FROM NW (:,OROF GOV LOT 6, RUN S .506 FT; RUN E TO W
R/W i.INIr- OF F.:*',.''r;'i' , NLY 606 FT MORE OR Ll. -KSS TO LAND IN D 6K
it,' Pz 666-p- RUN W TO P.O-B- AS I) BIC 26 PP 2,54
m•><x ia•x ai x •x• x �t•aF..••��•�t•ae� •it• ��•;c• ��• �t• ri ai•at• u x ��•• x•ae x ac u �i•�t �:� at � �t u aF4(• >H x •u �+�:c ��>Eac••x• x••u aF xaF� n aFaE x•�a« reit• x x � x••x•ac ,rpt
PARCEL 41- 06 31 39 00013 01' 10 3 00006.0 SOFT. 20473 ASSESSMENT 2,208.91
0WNErFMARZIN, DONALD t..AtJRENCE* & THE:LMA M
1000 LOUISIANA Atirs:: —w•==> 1000 LOUISIANA AV
SEBASTIAN FL 32958
LEGAL W 6 MARTINS SU( - F:186 3)12 BEG 600 FT S & tS FT E OF NW ('OR 0
F GOV LOT 6, RUN E3 200 FT TO P.O.B., RUN E TO W R/W LINE OF
FIX RY; RUN NL. Y 75 FT MOF::E OR LESS TO F'''I t -IA t' IS 713 FT N OFF' S
BDRY LINE OF ,``R.(il=' CONVEYED; RUN W .!'O PT 75 FT N OF P.O.B,
75 FT TO F'. 0. E:.. A'F: D BK 10 .E PF' 156 i OR BK 482 PF' 919 )
.h••It'P::IiI'•/':9t"It'al•1i'aC•.-:t'�t9:-aYR':•L aC al":•Ola'.........1.,-.:':-:':•1t'•,."::•,r,7R....,o,t....Yt'at••.:!'.nl".ti::',t..•:':'t'....,t'a:t:•i•1'.••..,t•.:':'.t•at.a.. .. ,p..i..,.,.. :r:•: •:r ., .. .. :
PARCEL 4 06 31 39 00013 0003 00007.0 SOFT. 4::689 ASSESSMa i' 4,60'E-86
OWNER GILLIAMS,DAMIEN 1-1 6 BONNIE FEY
713 LAYPORT DR ====> 516 G::RALD 61'
SEBASTIAN FL 3958
LEGAL W A MARTINS SUB F:1+;, 3)12 N 150 FT OF l=O1_L BEG 1206 FT S
6 iS FT E FROM Nltl COOF GOV LOT 6, RUN N :345 FT; RUN E 276 FT
TO R/W OF FEL..S RY RUN SWLY ALONG W R/W:IF ;`ELLS RY 350 FT M
ORE OR LESS TO F'.T E OF F' , O . B . ; RUN W.:.'_36 i "T TO F' . L; . B . D HK
45 PF' 204
DECEMBER 17, 1996 124
PARCEL 06 3i 39 00013 0003 00008.0 SOFT. i4375 ASSESSMEN[ 1,550.97
OWNER PALMER,ELIZABETH
PO BOX 295 ====> 9,36 L0UISIANA AV
SEBASTIAN FL 32978-0295
LEGAL W (4 MARTINS SU3 FBs 3}i2 BEG 1206 FT S & i5 FT E FROM NW COR
OF GOV LOT 6, RUN Ni95 FT, RUN E 170 FT, RUN S 85 FT-
'TO N
LINE OF TALL OALS DR; RUNW J.70 FT A|.(�NN L[NE OF TA�L OAKS
DR/ RUN N ALON� |' R/W OF LA AVE 85 FT [O P.O.B. AS R BK 7 '
PP 266 (DR BK 48.'.1 PP 845)
PARCEL � 06 31 39 00013 0003 00010.0 8QFT. i3939 ASSESSMENT 1,503.93
OWNER BARRON^RUTH
925 TALL OAKS 0R ====, 925 TALL OAKS DR
SEBASTIAN FL 32956
LEGAL. W A MARTINS SLY. FDS 3}12 13EG i206 FT S & 1.5 FT E FROM NW CUR
OF GOV LOT 6 RVt�/ N 345 FT, E 276 FT TO R/W OF FELLS RY/ RUN
S(,,ILY ON W R/W L) NE OF FELLS RY 350 FT MOR:- OR LESS TO PT E
OF P.O.B./ RU|%� k 236 FT TO P.O.B. AS D 8K 45 PP 204 LESS
N �5O FT & PAR D BK 99 PP 519 & AS D BK 107 PP 219 & PAR
CEL AS R BK 76 P; 26& PARCEL AS R BK 76 PP 265 (DR BK 493 PP
725) _
PARCEL � 06 3i. 39 00013 000-3 000ii.0 GQFT. /200 ASSESSMENT 776'83
OWNER FLOOD, DOUGLAS 8 & MTCHELLE L
924 LOUISIANA AVE 92'3 LOUISIANA AV
SEBASTIAN FL 32958
LEGAL W (4 MARTINS SUB FBS 3)12 CDM AT A PT ON E T'IDRY O}' LA AVE WH
ERE SUCH E BDRY LINEIS INTERSECTED BY WLYBDRf LINE (}F 81W
OF TRANS FLA CEN RY KNOWN AS FELLS RY &!-ROM SAID PT RUM -N O
N E BDRY LINE [,F LA AVE 382.5 FT TO P.O.B./ RUN E 120 FT/
RUN N 60 FT/ RUN W 120 FT TO E BDRY LINE OF LA AVE/ RUN S ON
E BDRY LIME OF LA AVE TO P.O.B. AS D BK iO7 PP ?19 & R BK
120 PP 4i7
PARCEL -ow- 06 31 39 00013 0003 00013^0 SOFT. 0400 wSSESSHEN[ 906.3U
OWNER WARD^8ETTY J
916 G LOUISIANA AVE 914 LOUISIANA AV
SEBASTIAN FL 32958
LEGAL W A MARTINS SOB FBS 3)12 BEG AT %NTRSEC OF E R/W LINE OF LA
AVE & N LINE OF FELLS RY R/W, RUN N ON E R/W LINE OF LA
AVE 242.5 FT rO P.O.B.- RUN E 120 FT/RUN J-40 FT&RUN W 120 F
T TO E RyW LIN.'::. OF LA AVE& RUN S ON E B/W LINE OF LA AVE
140 FT TO P.O^8, LESS THE N 70 FT AS IN OR BK 552 PP 228i
PARCEL 0 06 31 39 00813 0003 00013.1 SOFT. 8400 ASSESSMENT 906.30
OWNER CASTILLO,SANDRA
920 LOUISIANA AVE 920 LOUISIANA AV
SEBASTIAN FL 32958
LEGAL W A MARTINS SUB PBS 3-12 BEG ON LA AVF. & F -:-'LLS RY R/W, RUN
N 382.6 FT TO PUn, RUN E 120 FT, S 70 FT, W 1�� FT' N 70
FT TO PDB AS IN ox BK 552 PP 2281 '
PARCEL � 06 31 39 80Oi3 0003 0001.5.0 SOFT. i3068 ASSESSMENT -i'�09.95
OWNER HORNE'BARBARA J SiOUGM
RT 3 BOX 1517 912 LOUISIANA AV
STARKE FL 32091-9350
LEGAL W A MARTINS SU8 FBS 3)12 S 242.5 FT OF FDLL BEG AT INTRS�C
OF E R/W LINE OF LAAVE & N LINE OF FELLS RY R/W |NUN N 382.S
FT; RUN E 232.5 FT MORE OR LESS TO IN7�RBECT FELLG RY R
/W/ RUN SWLY A;-ONG N LINE OF FB -LS RY R/N TO P.O.D. AS 8 BK
25 PP 505 LESS P[/R IN SWi/4 OF SEi74; ALSO PART OF 8Wi/4
OF SE1/4 AS R �K 59 PP 553 (Oe BK 137 PP 367)
luo
�
,�
x�u��,' ��^= ����
125
PARCEL 06 31 39 000:13 0004 0000i'1 SOFT. 7-38*4 ASS.'-SSMEN[ 8,506'79
OWNER INDIAN RIVER COUNTY'
t84A 25TH ST
VERO BEACH FL 32960
LEGAL W A MARTINS SU8 PBS 3-12 A STRIP OF LANDTHRoUQ1 #Wi/4 OF SEi
/4 OF SEC 6. 35 �A* WIDE OF WHICH i0 FT ARE ON W SIDE & 25
Fr ON E SIDE OF CENTERLINE OF FELLSMERE RR, WHICH CENTERLINE
BEG AT A PT 186 FT E OF SW COR OF SAID NWi/4 OF SE 1/4, RUN
ON A 7 DEG CURVE TO LEFT, THE CHORD OF WHICH RUNS N 19 DEG
53 FT MORE OR LEcS TO W SIDE OF R/W OF rECRR & ALSO A PIECE
OF LAND DESC At ,OLL' BEG AT A PT LDChT-ED ON W SIDE OF R/W
OF FECRR 417 FT E & 294 FT N OF SW COR OF NHt/4 OF SEi/4 DF
SEC 6, RUN ALOHG W BDY LINE OF SAID R/W N 22 DEG W iRA FT TO
E BDY OF R/W OF FELL8MERE RR, T|i ON m 7 DEG CURVE TO
RIGHT, THE CHORD UF WHICH RUNS S 7 DEC*.. W 206 FT, TH M 68 0E
G E 99.5 FT TO &ALSO A PIECE OF LAND DESC AS �:'OLL: 8EC
AT NW COR OF SW2./'4 UF SEi/4' TH RUN S 370.25 FT' TH N-38 D
- EG E 475 FT, ~FH w 29-1.26 FT TO BEC |_ESS P011-"ZCEL DESC IN OR
BK 59 PP 553 (UR 8K 686 PP 347)
°IV ,A W. A -A AW — .". ),``.~`^.~ - " It . rt. . - ., .. rt. : "I``^="°"�!"".^^=,^.`=, ' "^^"..~.~..,`
PARCEL 0 06 31 39 00014 0070 00001.1 SOFT. 10890 ASSESSMENT i,J.7A'96
OWNER JUST%CE,CHESTER A * & CARR%NE B
17747 ST HWY 19*E ====»
PHYLLIS KY 41554
LEGAL HARDEE8 ADD. TO SEBASTIAN PBS 3-1 PART [IF /'OT A/K/A LOT 1 0
F SURVEY OF PART OF LOTS i TO 5 INC BLK 7^ /'ESS PORT FOR
ADD'L R/W AS DESC IN OR BK iii8 PG539
PARCEL � 06 3J 39 00014 0070 00001.2 SOFT. 1?000 ASSESSMEN[ 971.04
OWNER GMYDER,GREGORY L
832 LOUISIANA AVE ====> 1332 LOUISIANA #V
SEBASTIAN FL 32958
LEGAL HARDEES-ADD TO SEBASTIAN PBS 3+1 PART OF /'O[S t & 2 AS DES/,
IN R BK 314 PP 497 LESS SLY '75 FT, A/K/A LUT 2 OF SURVEY OF
PART OF LOTS i T[` 5 INC BLK 7
PARCEL � 06 31 39 00014 0("-,7O 0000i.4 SOFT. 9000 AS6ESSMENi Y7i-04
OWNER OLIwER,QLORIA E
9870 61ST 5T T�RF ====y 828 LOUISIANA AV
SEBASTIAN FL 32958
LEGAL HARDEES ADD TO SEBASTIAN PBS 3}1 PART OF LOTS t & 2 AS DESC
IN OR BK 491 Pp 500 A/K/A LOT 3 OF SURVEY OF PART OF LOTS i
TO 5 INC BLK 7 /UR BK 491 PP 500)
PARCEL IF 06 31 39 00014 0�r0 00002.0 SQFT. iO200 ASSESSMENT i'j.00.5i
OWNER HARRIS,QFZEG]RY
736 EDINBURG R{) ====/ 824 L/lUIS%ANA AV
TRENTON NJ 08619
LEGAL HARDEES ADD TO SEBASTIAN PBS 3}i PART (IF LO[ 2 AS DESC IN UR
Bk 365 PP 159, f-.LSUKNOWN AS LOT 4 & N i0 F[ OF LOT 5 DF
SURVEY OF PARr OF LOTS 1 TO 5 INC BLK 7
PARCEL 0 06 31 39 00014 00,"70 00003^0 SQFT. 1.0200 A80ESSHEN7 i,j.00.5i
OWNER GHAW'FZOBERT A A. �HInLEY
32o TANGELO GT ====x 820 LOUISIANA AV
SEBASTIAN FL 3I950
LEGAL MARDEES ADD TO SEDMSTIAN F'BS J)i PART OF LOT 3 AS IN OR Bu Z-
83
83 PP 124 A/K/"�'- [HE 65 FT OF LOT 5 & N 20 F' OF LOT 6 OF
SURVEY OF PAR: ['F LOTS i TO 5 INC BLK 7(UR BK 49� F'P 724)
DECEMBER 17 1996 126
_
PARCEL -% 06 31 39 00014 0"`70 00O04-0 SOFT. J. 3)Hoo ASSIISSMENT i'*80.97
OWNER GTONE,J#MES Or
720 LOUISIANA AVE /20 LnUISJANA AV
SEBASTIAN FL 32950,
LEGAL HA}�DEES ADD TO SEBASTIAN PBS 3}1. PARTS OF LOrS 4 & 5 AS IN
(O[. BK 405 PP 788) A/K/A S 5 FT OF LO[ .5 & LO7 7 & N 35 Ff
DF LOT 8 OF SURVEY OF PART OF LOTS i 115 INC BLK 7
^"^^-Jv="^^�°~"""="``" "=-",==^".--p.. . � *'.`,=-,-`~-'=,^, ` '' . ', '
PARCEL 40 06 3i 39 00014 0070 00004.1 SOFT. 1--4800 AS3ESSMEN/ i'488'93
OWNER HUBBARD'GEORGE W & BETTY A
808 LOUISIANA AVE. ====» 80-9 LOUISIANA #V
SEBASTIAN FL 32958
LEGAL HARDEES ADD TO SEBASTIAN PBS 3)i PART OF LO[S 4 & 5 A,,,iiK/A S
40 FT OF LOT 8 & 9 OSURVEY OF PART OF LOTS i TO 5 INC BLK 7
AS IN (OR BK 437: PP 201)
PARCEL -ow- 08 31 ;39 00014 CNK} 00005.0 SOFT. /4O5 ASSESSMENr '79B-95
OWNER PEDICO,OSCAR R & ROBERTA D
PD BOX 2632 LOUISIANA AV --
VE[zD BEACH FL 32961-2632
LEGAL HARDEES ADD TO SEBASTIAN PBS 3}i. PART* OF Lnr 5 AS R BK 305P
P 15 A/K/A LOT i(, OFSURVEY OF PART OF LOTS ). TO 5 INC. BL|: 7
PARCEL IJL 06 31 39 00014 0090 00011.0 SOFT. 2.-5087 ASSESSMENT 2'490.94
OWNER THDMFSON,BIU-Y J a.
C/O 613 GW ELLzm(-,SF-w AVE ====,
SEBASTIAN FL 32958
OWNER GOLIEN^GREGORY R PA &
OWNER LOVELESS,HELEN T
LEGAL HARDEE8 ADD TO SEBASTIAN PBS 3-1 LOTS \i' 12 & 13 BLK 9 (O
R BK 631 PP 5541)
PARCEL 0- 06 31 39 00017 01�10 0000i'0 SOFT. 939i ASSESSMENT 1'013.23
OWNER YOUNG'CHESTER (Lf)
300 VALENCIA Sr 304 VALENCIA ST
SEBASTIAN Fl. 32958
OWNER YOUNG,CHESTER DAvID
LEGAL ORANGE HEIGHTS Si/B UNIT i PBI 7`49 LOT i LE/3S W 7� FT BI -K i
(OR BK 405 PF, 92�/
TOTAL SQ FEET IS TOTAL ASSESSMENT [S 155'400'10
DECEMBER �'7
�', ���~" ����
127
�
�
���� ; �PALE�"��
_23G�`_I -1=1-12'IIJ _1-
STREEI
Qk-
-71 �
LOUISIANA AVE WATER MA MAIN ST.
TO C. R. 512
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY PROJECT
NO. UW -96 -17 -DS
F
E.
S IR.E
iaO
k- d. �p
SIRET
T
I dc R
0",
L I
Dimensions shown aiv approximate
RED DASHED LINES REPRESENT EXISTING FOI
BLUE DASHED LINES REPRESENT EXISTING W
GREEN DASHED LINES REPRESENT EXISTING
DECEMBER 17, 1996 128
CEUMNLINES
TER LINES
GRAVITY SEWED
CORNERSTONE SELECT HOMES, INC. - DEVELOPER'S
AGREEMENT FOR CONSTRUCTION OF SEBASTIAN MODEL HOME
CENTER
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of December 6, 1996:
DATE: DECEMBER 6, 1996
TO: JAMES E. CHANDLER
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
FROM: TERRANCE G. PINT01
DIRECTOR OF IL3kTY� VICES
PREPARED WILLIAM F. , P.E
AND STAFFED CAPITAL P E ER
BY: DEPARTME LITY SERVICES
SUBJECT: CORNERST SELECT HOMES, INC., DEVELOPER'S
AGREEMENT FOR CONSTRUCTION OF THE SEBASTIAN
MODEL HOME CENTER
BACKGROUND
Attached is a proposed developer's agreement with Cornerstone
Select Homes, Inc., for reimbursement of offsite utility
construction. The construction consists of an 8 -inch water main on
US 1 south of Schumann Drive, _which is sized to serve the
surrounding area. Cost-sharing is covered in the agreement under
Exhibits A and B.
ANALYSIS
As stated, Exhibits A and B of the attached agreement identify the
cost-sharing between the developer and the County. A summary of
cost-sharing is as follows:
Water Main
Developer's share $ 2,868.75
County's share 22.503.25
Total Project Cost $25,372.00
The construction of this system will assist the County in expanding
the water system. Water service can be provided from a line on
the north side of the developer's property (see attached location
map). However, as a result of the Utilities Department's need to
provide future service to the south of this site, we have requested
the developer to extend a water main to service the area to the
south across. his property and recover a portion of the cost from
the developer per our line extension ordinance at a charge of
$11.25 per front foot. The total estimated cost to the County of
$22,503.25 will be paid from the Utilities impact fee fund.
The staff of the Department of Utility Services recommends that the
Board of County Commissioners approve the developer's agreement as
presented and authorize the chairman to execute same.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by
Commissioner Ginn, the Board unanimously approved
the Agreement with Cornerstone Select Homes, Inc.
for the construction of off-site utilities for the
Sebastian Model Home Center, as recommended by
staff.
AGREEMENT IS ON FILE IN THE OFFICE
OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
DECEMBER 17, 1996 129
26TH STREET REUSE WATER LINE RELOCATION LABOR
CONTRACT - DRIVEWAYS. INC. - CHANGE ORDER NO. 1 AND
FINAL PAYMENT
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of December 9, 1996:
DATE: DECEMBER 9, 1996
TO: JAMES E. CHANDLER
COUNTY ADMINISTRAT
FROM: TERRANCE G. PINTO
DIRECTOR OF UTILi RVICES
PREPARED ROBERT O. WISEMEN, P.E.
AND STAFFED ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEER
BY: DEPARTMENT OF UTILITY SERVICES -
SUBJECT: 26TH STREET REUSE WATER LINE RELOCATION LABOR CONTRACT
WORK AUTHORIZATION NO. 40
CHANGE ORDER NO. 1 AND FINAL PAYMENT
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY PROJECT NO. IIS -96 -21 -ED
BACKGROUND
On October 15, 1996, the Board of County Commissioners approved and executed
the labor contract with Driveways, Inc., Work Authorization No. 40, in the
amount of $6,147.68. For details of the above -referenced line relocation,
please see attached agenda item.
ANALYSIS
The relocation work has been completed. During construction an adjustment
was made in the field based on staff recommendation. The contractor found
another drainage culvert approximately two and half feet deeper than the
proposed first identified pipe. Subsequently, the crossing of both pipes
must be made deeper than it was originally proposed along with the need for
dewatering. The adjustment of quantities was made as shown in the change
order spreadsheet, resulting in an addition of $1,025.00. This will increase
the total contract amount to $7,172.68. To date, the total payment made to
the contractor is $4,414.66, leaving a balance of $2,758.02, including the
proposed Change Order No. 1.
RECOMMENDATION
The staff of the Department of Utility Services recommends the Board of
County Commissioners approval of Change Order No. 1, in the amount of
$1,025.00, which adjusted the contract amount to $7,172.68. Also, the staff
recommends approval of the final pay request in the amount of $2,758.02 to
Driveways, Inc., for services rendered.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by
Commissioner Tippin, the Board unanimously approved
Change Order No. 1 in the amount of $1,025 and the
final pay request of $2,758.02 to Driveways, Inc.,
as recommended by staff.
CHANGE ORDER IS ON FILE IN THE OFFICE
OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
DECEMBER 17, 1996 130
COUNTY'S ETHICS ORDINANCE - STATE GIFT LAW - DISCUSSION
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of December 9, 1996:
TO: Board of County Commissioners
FROM: Commissioner Fran B. Adams, Chairman -51�k
DATE: December 9, 1996
SUBJECT: November 14, 1996 Memo from T. O'Brien to the BCC re Changes
To the State Gift Law
Based on the new statutes for gifts and meals, etc., is there any interest by
the Commission in reviewing the County's Ethics Ordinance and make it coincide
with the State of Florida's ordinance, or do you prefer to leave it as it now stands.
One of the reasons I am bringing this up is that there has been expressed to
me some feeling that perhaps the Commissioners seem aloof in their dealings with
the public and businesses because of not wanting to partake in or visit an open
house, or anniversary celebration, for fear of violating the County code.
If you would express your feelings on the matter, I would be very grateful.
If there is any interest, I will put it on the agenda for discussion.
Commissioner Macht requested that the question be deferred
until he had an opportunity to discuss it with the legal
department.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Macht, SECONDED by
Commissioner Ginn, the Board unanimously agreed to
table this item until the first or second week in
January, 1997.
LIBRARY SUPPORT
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of December 91 1996:
TO • DATE F Z L E :
Alice White, Executive December 9, 1996
Aid to the Board
SUBJECT -
Library Supports„S i F?0_8jjTjQj ;S+? M_
Admi:lfstrst-r.
REFERENCES : Atfcr-ey _
FROM : Mary D. Powell, Libra i tiR%+L VY0TAS -- __--
Services Director C0mr;1V ty Dg' !. —
UtfiX;--7
Mlai-
Alice,
Attached is a legislative alert --immediate action needed:''-: _ --
Secretary of State, Sandra B. Mortham wants to hear fk6a
our legislators that they support libraries and state
funding of them. Please ask the Commissioners to ask the
legislators to write to the Secretary of State and request
DECEMBER 17 131
1996 "' 9
14-3
�A.'f
an increase of 5,000,000. for the State Aid to Libraries
Program to be included in her supplemental budget for
91-98. She will not support funds for libraries if the
legislators do not write and ask her to do so. Please also
ask the Commissioners to write, call, or fax the
Governor's office requesting an additional 5,000,000. in
State Aid to Libraries be included in the Governor's 97-98
budget. -'
Thank you for your help in this matter. Information is
attached.
Tits 'NEW" political climate demands an image of libraries that is aggro nve, positive, and efficient.
Goal 01 Deadline January 1, 1991
Irave each Legislator in your county wdia Secretary Sandia Mortham and temrest an increase of
S5,000,000 Ibr the State Aid to Libraries 1'rograrn be Included In her supplemental budget for 1997-98
Secretary of State Sandra B. Mortham, PLO2 Ilia Capitol, Tallairassee, M 32399-0750
Telephone: 904-414-5500 FAX: 904.487-2214
F. -mall: smotthanr a mail.dos.sta►e.8.us or sectetery(c?mail.dos state.11.to
Goal 02 Deadline December 1, 1996
Have Mum's and trusted write, taro or FAX the ('governor's otiice tequesting an additional S5.0pt).Ow
In State Aid to Libraries be htcluded in tine 1991-98 Governor's budget.
Governor Lawton Chiles, PLOS The Capitol, Tallahassee, FL. 32399-0001
Telephone: 9044884441 FAX: 9041187-0801
To send a message via Governor's website: www.eog.state. ().us
Goal N3
Request Secretary of State Sandra Mortharn to include the $2.4 million fbr six cooperatives pet -milled
by law for the Libmry Cooperatives in her 1997-98 supplemental budgtnt request. Request governor
CY- I -n to include S2.4 million for Library Cooperatives in his 1997-98 Governor's budget.
DeaArres mxf ddiemes are sante as Goals 01 mal #2.
Goal N4
For those counties needing a construction grant. l lave your Legislrttors cotttnct Seactaty of State
Mc"Imm and request the project be included in her 1997-911supple nrentai budget. Request Governor
Chiles to include the project in the 1997-98 Governur's budget.
Deadlines and ad*Wes M ware as Goals Of avid II2.
Check list to achieve these goals:
• Make appointmetrt with all legislators in district NOWI1
• Decide who Is beat person to visit legislator. It maybe different tin each legislainr All the
contributors to legislative campaigns are utt the Internet .
ltttp://election.dos.state.tl.us/camptin/ctindb.httn.
• Collect thel sheets ibr each visit. FI.A has grnetal lite) alraets for State Aid arul Ilse Libi ary
Coopetalives. FLA has current Itmding rums showing what each country will receive at the
difr'erent Finding levels.
e Set foilow updates In November and December to check propiem and Ire prepared to
report back.
DECEMBER 17, 1996 132
Commissioner Eggert requested that each Commissioner read the
backup and write a letter in support.
CONSENSUS was reached that each Commissioner will write the
Governor's Office requesting an additional $5,000,000 in State Aid
to Libraries be included in the Governor's 1997-98 budget.
Chairman Adams wished everyone a Merry Christmas and a Happy
New Year and reminded everyone that the Tower Workshop will be held
on Thursday, December 19, 1996, beginning at 9:30 A.M.
There being no further business, on Motion duly made, seconded
and carried, the Board adjourned at 12:31 a.m.
ATTEST:
< Z: �?- �L Q Dx k,,�
J. arton, Clerk
Minutes Approved: //(/-97-
DECEMBER 17, 1996 133
kz9v 0,V" (6 ()da,4�
Fran B. Adams, Chairman