HomeMy WebLinkAbout2026-137IRC-2519
Roseland Road Bridge over Sebastian River Prong
ENGINEERING SERVICES WORK ORDER 22
This Work Order Number 02 is entered into as of this day of August , 2026
pursuant to that certain Continuing Contract Agreement, dated May 2, 2023, ("Agreement"), by and
between INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Florida ("COUNTY") and
Consor North America, Inc.
("Consultant")
The COUNTY has selected the Consultant to perform the professional services set forth on
Exhibit A (Scope of Work), attached to this Work Order and made part hereof by this reference. The
professional services will be performed by the Consultant for the mutually agreed upon lump sum or
maximum amount not -to -exceed professional fee. Any additional costs must be approved in writing,
and at a rate not to exceed the prices set forth in Exhibit B of the Agreement (Rate Schedule) for RFQ
2023015, made a part hereof by this reference. The Consultant will perform the professional services
within the timeframe more particularly set forth in Exhibit A (Time Schedule), attached to this Work
Order and made a part hereof by this reference all in accordance with the terms and provisions set
forth in the Agreement. Pursuant to paragraph 1.4 of the Agreement, nothing contained in any Work
Order shall conflict with the terms of the Agreement and the terms of the Agreement shall be deemed
to be incorporated in each individual Work Order as if fully set forth herein.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Work Order as of the date first
written above.
CONSULTANT: CONSOR NORTH AMERICA, INC.
By:
Name: Srnlmf Gelltr
Title: Psi I eck
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSONERS OF-:'`f'45�
INDIAN RIVER COUN -. / ion✓F ;'
By:
Deryl Loar, Chairman
BCC Approval Date: Aiust 4, 4 L' ; rni;1
By:722/?et/'
John A. Tit nick, Jr., County Administrator
Approved as to Form and Legal Sufficiency:
By: I r+' - SJt./
J nifer . Shuler, County Attorney
Ryan L. Butler, Clerk of Court and Comptroller
Attest:
Deputy CI c
(SEAL)
consor
July 21, 2026
Adam Heltemes, PE
Roadway Production Manager
Indian River County
1840 25", Street,
Vero Beach, FL 32960
2041 Vista Parkway, Suite 101
West Palm Beach, FL 33411
561.253.9550
RE: CR-505/Roseland Road over Sebastian River Prong, Bridge No. 884019
Indian River County, Florida
Dear Mr. Heltemes,
Consor North America, Inc. (Consor) appreciates the opportunity to submit a fee proposal for the subject project. The
purpose of the project is to replace the existing bridge along CR-505/Roseland Road over Sebastian River Prong, Bridge
No. 884019, herein referred to as the PROJECT, for Indian River County, herein referred to as COUNTY.
This fee proposal has been developed with the following assumptions:
• All designs will comply with AASHTO LRFD (current edition), FDOT Structures Manual (current edition),
Manual of Uniform Minimum Standards for Design, Construction and Maintenance for Streets and Highways
(known as the Florida Greenbook) (current edition).
• Contract Plans will be prepared in accordance with the current FDOT Design Manual.
• A full road closure with detour will be utilized during construction. Temporary Traffic Control (TTCP) Plans will
not be designed or provided by Consor.
• The COUNTY will perform any necessary Public Involvement, Survey/SUE and Geotechnical services for the
project.
• Phase submittals will include a bridge hydraulic analysis, 60% Submittal, 90% submittal and Final (digitally
signed and sealed) submittal.
• Permit fees have not been included in this fee proposal. All permit fees will be paid directly by the COUNTY.
• Post design services and Construction Engineering Inspection (CEI) are not included in this scope and fee
proposal.
INDEX OF TASKS
The following categories correspond to the estimate of work effort and staff hour fee sheet:
Task 3
Project General Tasks
Task 4 & 5
Roadway Analysis & Plans
Task 6
Drainage Analysis and Plans
Task 7
Utilities
Task 8
Environmental Permits and Clearances
Task 9, 10 & 12 Structures Summary, BDR and Short Span Concrete
Task 19
Signing & Marking Analysis and Plans
Task 36
Utility Work by Highway Contractor (UWHC)
Task 99
Bid and Award Phase
www.consoreng.com
Page 2
TASK 3 PROJECT GENERAL TASKS
This task includes the development of an estimated quantities report, contract maintenance, digital delivery,
aeronautical evaluation and Prime Consultant Project Manager Meetings and Project Manager field review. The
estimated design schedule is 12 months.
Consor will schedule and facilitate in -person comment resolution meetings with the COUNTY at each phase submittal
(preliminary bridge concept, 60%, 90%). At these meetings Consor will discuss the project, receive written comments
from COUNTY personnel, respond to comments received and incorporate accepted responses to comments into the
contract plans and documents.
TASKS 4 & 5 ROADWAY ANALYSIS AND PLANS
Consor will develop approach roadway plans to meet the new bridge structure. A vertical profile will be developed to
meet minimum clearance requirements as determined in the bridge hydraulic analysis. Approaches will be
reconstructed to meet the new bridge and to the length of the new guardrail at a minimum (approximately 250 feet on
both ends). The existing horizontal alignment will be maintained. Additional Right -of -Way is not anticipated.
The existing two-lane, two-way roadway configuration will be maintained. The shoulders will be transitioned to meet
the new bridge typical section. The proposed design speed is anticipated to be 45 mph. A 10 -wide raised
sidewalk/multiuse path is anticipated on both sides of the bridge.
The contractor is expected to submit signed and sealed TTC Plans to be approved by the COUNTY
Anticipated list of sheets for Roadway Plans:
• Key Sheet
• Signature Sheet
• Typical Section Sheet
• Typical Section Detail Sheet (as needed)
• General Notes Sheet
• Roadway Plan/Profile Sheets (11"x17")
• Cross Section Sheets
• Utility Adjustment Sheets
• Signing and Pavement Marking Plan Sheets/Details
An Engineer's Cost Estimate will be provided with the 60%, 90% and Final Submittals.
TASKS 6 DRAINAGE ANALYSIS AND PLANS
Consor will prepare a bridge hydraulic analysis to determine vertical clearance and scour requirements. The analysis
will utilize the effective Flood Insurance Study (FIS) HEC-RAS model, to be provided by the County. The bridge limits of
the FIS model will be updated per current survey information and utilized as the effective existing conditions model. A
proposed model will be developed and utilized for comparison with existing conditions and verification of No -Rise in
flood elevations. Water levels will be assessed for the 50 -year, 100 -year and 500 -year frequency. A required low
member elevation will be determined. Scour estimates will be developed for the 100 -year and 500 -year frequencies to
consider with foundation design. A memorandum will be prepared to summarize findings.
A No -Rise certification will be required.
The design will include a closed system of inlets and pipes to convey runoff from the bridge deck to the channel.
www.consoreng.com
Page 3
Anticipated list of sheets for Drainage Plans:
• Drainage Map
• Drainage Structures Sheets
• Summary of Drainage Structures Sheet
Drainage Deliverables will include:
• Bridge Hydraulics Report
• No -Rise Certification
• Drainage Design Report (Brief)
TASK 7 UTILITIES
A preliminary Sunshine One Call 811 ticket and field investigation indicates the following utilities are present in the
project corridor:
FPL — Distribution
FPL — Subaqueous
Indian River Utilities
AT&T
Comcast
Consor will contact utility owners, provide conflict matrix, schedule utility meetings and incorporate any required plan
changes resulting from any conflicts and resolutions.
TASK 8 ENVIRONMENTAL PERMITS AND CLEARANCES
Consor will provide environmental permitting support for the proposed PROJECT, including a site inspection to verify
existing site conditions, a desktop review of available environmental resources, and coordination with the COUNTY and
regulatory agencies, as needed, to confirm applicable permitting requirements.
The COUNTY has obtained an Environmental Resource Permit (ERP) exemption from the St. John's River Water
Management District. Consor will prepare and submit the documentation necessary to support a U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers Nationwide Permit Self -Certification and obtain U.S. Coast Guard Advance Approval for the proposed bridge.
This scope includes one (1) submittal to each agency and one (1) response to Requests for Additional Information (RAls),
if required. Agency review schedules are outside Consor's control. Regulatory application fees, if any, shall be paid
directly by the COUNTY.
Threatened and endangered species review shall be limited to a desktop evaluation and observations made during the
site inspection to identify the potential presence of suitable habitat or other environmental conditions that may affect
permitting. This scope excludes wetland delineations, formal threatened and endangered species surveys, Biological
Assessments, formal agency consultations, cultural resource investigations, compensatory mitigation, permit
modifications resulting from design changes after submittal, and construction -phase environmental compliance
services.
www.consoreng.com
Page 4
TASK 9, 10 & 12 STRUCTURES SUMMARY, BDR AND SHORT SPAN CONCRETE
At the request of the County, Consor will design a Florida -Slab Beam (FSB) superstructure. Span arrangement (single
span or two -span) will be coordinated with hydraulic and roadway profile requirements. Foundation alternatives to be
considered include prestressed concrete piles (smallest permitted based on loading and geotechnical requirements)
and Geosynthetic Reinforced Soil (GRS) walls and abutments. The ability to implement GRS-IBS is dependent on bridge
length and hydraulics.
Consor will complete the design and construction plans for the chosen bridge type. A Load and Resistance Factor Rating
(LRFR) package will be prepared and submitted with the 90% phase submittal. Consor will coordinate with FDOT to
assign a new bridge number. The new bridge design will accommodate an allowance for future re -attachment of the
existing watermain to the outside coping of the bridge.
Anticipated list of sheets for Structure Plans:
• Structures Key Sheet
• Signature Sheet
• General Notes
• Plan and Elevation
• Riprap Details
• Report of Core Borings (provided by Geotechnical Engineer)
• Bridge Hydraulic Recommendations Sheet (provided by Drainage Engineer)
• Foundation Layout & Pile Data Table
• End Bent Plan/Elevation & Details
• Intermediate Bent Plan/Elevation & Details
• Beam Layout
• Bridge Typical Section
• Superstructure Plan/Reinforcing Details
• Beam Table/Detail Sheets
• Finish Grade Sections/Elevations
• Reinforcing Bar List
• Load Rating Summary
• Applicable FDOT Standard Plans
TASK 19 & 20 SIGNING AND MARKING ANALYSIS/PLANS
Consor will develop design, details and quantities associated with signing and pavement markings for this project. A No
Passing Zone Study will not be required. This project will be striped so that passing is NOT allowed. The Signing and
Pavement Marking Plans will be included in the Roadway Plan set.
TASK 36 UTILITY WORK BY HIGHWAY CONTRACTOR (UWHC)
Consor will provide design services to replace the existing potable water main along Roseland Road that is installed as
an aerial crossing adjacent to existing bridge (Bridge No. 884019). See Holtz Consulting Engineers, Inc. proposal for
complete scope and breakdown of the fees for this task.
www.consoreng.com
Page 5
TASK 99 BID AND AWARD PHASE
Consor will attend the pre -bid meeting and answer any questions regarding the Construction Plans or technical
aspects of bid documents during the bid process.
The services described herein will be performed for a lump sum fee of $395,324.42. Please do not hesitate to contact
me if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
Consor North America, Inc.
Jaime R. Celler, PE, Principal Project Manager
561-253-9566 1 Jaime.Celler@consoreng.com
www.consoreng.com
Name of Project:
oUnty:
FPN:
AP No.:
ESTIMATE OF WORK EFFORT AND COST - PRIME CONSULTANT
CR-505rRoseland Road over Sebastian River Prong (Brloge No. 884019) Bridge Replai,ement
Indian River
NIA
NIA
Consultant Name: Consor North Amenca, Inc
Consultant No.: TBD
Date: 7.2112026
Estimator- Cellar
SfA1f CWaMoallon
Total Staff
Hours Flom
Summary -
Flrm'
Chief
E8BiRW
Sealer IF
Idespr
Senior
EnSlnuur
Projaof
Engineer
Senior
0s gnsr
Eaglnaarwg
Intern
CADD
Technician
!1111 CIr11-
flpllohl
Nall Clwa4
B4allan9
N11f Chad-
fba0p110
BIan CWat-
flratbn 11
st.R Closer
leaden 12
SH
By
ActIvIty
Salary
Leal By
Actin
Average
Rata Par
Task
$314.99
$27941
$23927
lISt.92
$125.75
$' st tl
11066
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$000
$000
Common and Pro.ct Genet Talks
140
0
90
0
38
0
7
0
0
0
0
0
0
140
$34,910
$249.31.
Roadwe Anat.'s
237
12
47
43
84
47
24
0
0
0
0
0
0
237
$48,341
$20397
. Roauwav Plans
02
4
18
18
22
is
8
0
0
0
0
0
0
82
$16,773
$204.55
Drama a 1.707 55
292
14
28
71
42
56
71
0
0
0
0
0
0
282
$53.485
$18966
Drawe Plars
N
4
9
22
13
17
21
0
0
0
0
0
0
86
$18.379
$190.45
U61Aes
Be
0
6
13
17
17
13
0
0
0
0
0
0
06
$11.837
$179.34
. Lnvrovrwvta Penn0s.and Env. CWrarraa
82
0
20
0
0
0
a
82
0
0
0
0
0
82
$12,449
$151.82
Struc:rures-Msr T00050wg5NoomTeth
180
9
27
3
36
36
36
0
0
0
0
0
0
180
$35,030
$194.81
10. StrucWes - Bidg. Development Report
36
2
6
7
7
7
7
0
0
0
0
0
0
36
$7.100
$197.21
12 Slruchiree - Snrxt Span Concrete Bridr
500
25
75
100
100
100
100
0
0
0
0
0
0
500
$97.305
$194.61
19. S,grnng 8 Pavement Marslrg Anal sls
52
4
10
10
13
10
5
0
0
0
0
0
0
52
$10.814
$207.97
0. S n n d Pavci"art Mart, P'rs
26
1
5
5
7
5
3
C
0
0
0
0
0
26
$5252
$202.00
Total Staff Hours
1,769
75
347
323
366
311
295
62
0
0
0
0
0
1769
Total Staff Cost
$23.624.25
$96.955 27
577 264.21
567.25552
$39.108 25
$3858600
56660,92
$0.00
$0.00
$000
$000
5000
1340874.42
$197.67
Survey Fled Days by Subronsultant
4 Person Crew ]
Chad =
$34967442
LARY RELATED COSTS
$349,674.42
:VERHEAD
$0.00
PERAT ING MARGIN
1' ,.
$0.00
CCM (Faolibes Capital Cost Money)
$0.00
XPENSSS I
rr''
$000
rve Field - if by Prime) C
0-per5M Crew
oay_s$O,
-
'day
.00
SUBTOTAL ESTIMATED FEE:
$349,674.42
bconsultanl'.
Holtz Conaulr E--. Ira
$tt,`i.0 CC
onsultant:
Sub2
$030
6consullart:
Sub 3
$0.00
BTOTAL ESTIMATED FEE:
$36,324.42
GeoterMrnrttl Field end Lab TestIng
$000
SUBTOTAL ESTIMATED FEE:
$35,324.42
Corporal SCIyCe9
$0.00
RAND TOTAL ESTIMATED FEE:
5305,324.42
884019_ CR505OverStibaalan_SHE_NASTER_W
Fm Shoo,. ornvr Pape 1 of 7 712/2026 9:11 AM
Prolect Activity 3: General Tasks
Estimator J. Cellar CR-505,Roseland Road over Sebastian River Prong (Bridge No. 884019) Bridge Replacement
Representing
Print Narita
Signature I Dab
FOOT District
Consultant Name
NOTE: Signature Block Is optional, per District preference
li
Task
Unit
No of Unit
Hou sl Unit
FTto11 l
Comment
3.1
Public Involvement
Assume Indian River County will handle
3.1.1
Community Awareness Plan
LS
1
0
0
NIA
3.1.2
Notifications
LS
1
0
0
NIA
31.3
Preparing Mailing Lists
LS
1
0
0
N/A
3.1.4
Median Modification Letters
LS
1
0
0
N/A
3.1.5
Driveway Modification Letters
LS
1
0
0
N/A
3.1.6
Newsletters
LS
1
0
0
N/A
3.1.7
Renderings and Fly Throughs
LS
1
0
0
N/A
3.1.8
PowerPoint Presentation
LS
1
0
0
N/A
3.1.9
Public Meeting Preparations
LS
1
0
0
N/A
3.1.10
Public Meeting Attendance+Followup
LS
1
0
0
N/A
3.1.11
Other Agency Meetings
LS
1
0
0
NIA
3.1.12
Web Site
LS
1
0
0
N/A
3.1 Public Involvement Subtotal
0
3.2
Joint Project Agreements
EA
0
0
0
N/A
3.3
Specifications & Estimates
33.1
Specifications Package Preparation
LS
1
0
0
N/A
33.2
Estimated Quantities Report Preparation
Report
t
Calculated
Hours
26
211
Assume Roadway, Draina
ge. age. S3PM. Structures. UWHC
Components
5
3.4
Contract Maintenance and Project Documentation
LS
1
52
52
16 hours for initial setup + assume 3 hours per month for 12 months
3.5
Value Engineering (Multi -Discipline Team) Review
LS
1
0
0
N/A
3.6
Prime Consultant Project Manager Meetings
LS
1
28
28
See listing below
3.7
Plans Update
LS
1
0
0
N/A
684019_CR505OverSebaatian_SHE_MASTER_v3
3 Project General Tasks Page 20127 7/7/2026
Project Activity 3. General Tasks
Task
k
N3.8
Task
Units No of Units Hours! Unit
Total l
Comments
Post Design Services
LS
1
0
To be negotiated under a new Task at completion of design
3.9
Digital Delivery
LS
1
10
18
6 hours setup + 3hours x4 EOR's (Roadway, Drainage, Structures, UWHC)
3.10
Risk Assessment Workshop
LS
1
0
0
N/A
3.11
Railroad, Transit. and/or Airport Coordination
LS
1
0
0
NIA
3.11.1
Aeronautical Evaluation
Landscape and Existing Vegetation Coordination
LS
1
16
16
N/A
3.12
LS
1
0
0
3.13
Other Project General Tasks
LS
1
0
0
N/A
3. Project Common and Project General Tasks Total
140
3.6- List of Project Manager Meetings
Units
No of Units
Hours/ Unit
Total Hours
Comments
Roadway Analysis
EA
1
2
2
•�i��;d
Drainage
EA
0
0
0
Selective C&G
EA
0
0
0
Virtual
Utilities
EA
1
2
2
Environmental
EA
0
0
0
Structures
EA
0
0
0
Signing & Pavement Marking
EA
0
0
0
Sgnalization
EA
0
0
0
Lighting
EA
0
0
0
Landscape Architecture
EA
0
0
0
Survey
EA
0
0
0
Photogrammetry
EA
0
0
0
ROW & Mapping
EA
0
0
0
Terrestrial Mobile LiDAR
EA
0
0
0
Architecture
EA
0
0
0
Noise Barriers
EA
0
0
0
ITS Analysis
EA
0
0
0
Geolechnical
EA
0
0
0
Progress Meetings
EA
0
0
0
Phase Reviews
EA
3
6
18
Assume three Phase Review Meetings (preliminary bridge concept. 60%, 90%I
Field Reviews
EA
1
6
6
Assume one PM Field Review
884019_CR505OverSebastian_SHE_MASTER_v3
3. Project General Tasks Page 3 of 27 7/7/2026
Project Activity 3: General Tasks
Tasko
Task
Units
No of Units
Hours/ Unit
Total
Hours
Total Project Manager Meetings
6
28
Total PM Meeting Hours carries to Task 3.6 above
Notes.
I If the hours per meeting vary in length (hours) enter the average in the hourtunit column.
2. Do not double count agency meetings between permitting agencies.
3. Project manager meetings are calculated in each discipline sheet and brought forward to Column D.
K8e019 C45i]5OverSe:asta^ SH_- MASILR v3
3 P ,:.e'I :Jrnm Tasty
acr 4 v` ?
Representing Print Name
Signature I Date
FOOT District
Consultant Name
j I.r
Teek Project Parameter Staff Hours
Documentation
No. Task
Description Units Complexity
Calculated Department Consultant Negotiated
Provide documentation when negotiated hours differ from the calculated hours
What Is the overall project complexity? (See Roadway Guidelines Mid
Cover
0
..
..
n
enn.tme no ryprel sactbn nnckute recurred
Typical
0
2.Lane FS
0
0
n
0
4 1
Typical Seebon Package
8 Ramps
T I
ypIca
0
2- C a
0
0
0
0
Muttt-U-La na FS
T l
yPtca
0
L wr Earneer
a
0
0
0
N/A
d MusllanC
42
Pavement Type Selection Report
Report
0
Mandrd
0
0
0
0
WA
Report a
Assam
0
Lew
0
0
0
o
WA
4 3
Pavement Design Package
Pavt Designs
0
TrsvelAux. Lanes
0
0
0
0
Prnv nM cy l-rrc r Rver C.rri:'rry
Pavt Designs
0
other R pills A
0
0
0
0
Promaxl uy hiurar '0 our CO1 rty
W'A
X -Skins
0.00
Undivided Roadway
0
0
0
0
4.4
Cross Slow Analysis (lanes arid shoulders)
X -Slope
AaaessmeM
0.00
DMded Roadway
0
0
0
0
WA
Cwnn
0
0
0
0
0
WA
0
0
0
0
0
WA
45
Safety Analysis
Crash Anayos
0
0
0
0
0
WA
Monitd Exist.
1
Mid
0
0
6
0
45
Design Analysis
Structures
Accs
Mane t
0.00
Mid
0
0
0
0
WA
Roundabout
0
1x1 Rou debout
0
0
0
0
N/A
47
Operabonal Analyse
Roundabout
0
1x2 Roundabout
0
0
0
0
WA
Rouridabout
0
2x2 Roundabout
0
0
0
0
WA
RRR
0
0
0
0
0
N/A
40
Design Reports
Other Reports
0
0
0
0
WA
VariationT
Memo
0
0
0
0
0
WA
49
Design Variations and E...ptbns
F 11
0
0
0
0
0
WA
Design
0
0
0
0
0
WA
4 1D
Mastr Design Fite Setup d Marnlwance, Model
LS
1
IMd
b
0
JO
0
Alan Ran
Mainline
0.16
Mid
35
0
35
0
Horizotntal .Vertical Master Design Files
SId. Road a
0.05
Mid
11
0
11
0
Frontage Road
0.00
Mid
0
0
0
0
WA
411
Mallme
0.16
MM
18
0
is
0
So. Road a
0.05
Mid
0
0
6
0
30 Modeling Develdaners
�rrpa
Frontage Road
0.00
Mid
0
0
0
0
WA
AUG F/lee
0
Mid
0
0
0
0
N/A
TTCP Malysia
LS
0
Low
0
0
0
0
4 12
TTCP Master Desgn Fiks
Lengal
IPh...Mdas)
0.00
MM
0
0
0
0
WA
P.d. tnan
0
0
0
0
0
WA
TTCP 30 Modd.ng (isolated Locations)
Locatate
0
0
0
0
0
WA
4.13
Utrhly Data Cdbclbn 8 Analysis
LS
1
MM
12
0
12
0
analyze and coordinate utddy data
4 l4
Roadway Ouanetw for LO Report
La. gltt (Rules)
0.10
MM
2
0
2
0
I
0
0
40
0
0
0
34
0
0
WA
Valideaon
1
Olld
TTCP Quaraieas 1w EQ Reood
Map Phases
0
lifend�d
0
0
0
0
WA
4.15
Cost Esllrnale
Engineer
Estimate
3
Mb
36
0
30
0
assume 3 sutaniltals (60%. 90%. Final)
LRE Updates
0
MM
0
0
0
0
WA
4.16
Tactical or Mod(ied Speed Provrsons
TSPs d MSPs
0
0
0
0
0
WA
4.11
Other Roadway Tasks
O&W Mel ysd<
0
1s
0
&d and Award Prune Services
Raadtwy Analysis TaaMd9M
2N
0
206
0
4.10
Qud4y Assurance/Qual(y Conlyd
LS
1
5%
11
C
11
0
4.19
Supen+sion
LS
1
1
5%
11
0
11
0
420
Roadway Meetings (listed below)
Meetings
2
0
2
0
Travel Time
0
0
0
0
4 21
Field Rewews ;hslnd maw,
LS
0
0
Roadway Analysis Non -Technical Subtotal 24
0
24
0
422 coordinator LS 1 -
..
0
4. Roadway Analysis Tota 239
0
237
0
Tochnkal MSO11ngs a Meetings Travel Time 0 Meetings
Desi ner Hours PM
Documentation
Typical Section
vitiva..
Pavenwrt Dssgn
Aces Managamrd r Drneweys
0
15% Line and Grade
0
C
RRR I ECAR Readulgn
0
0
0
Local Governments (dtree, ooumles, MPO)
0
C
0
Work Zone Tragic. Contrd
0
C
0
3001)00% Commem Review Meetings
C
C
0
Uti/ty Coord-nation
other Meetings
0
C
Subtotal Technical Me.tings 1
0
1
Pnrgress Mwmngs IA reo.n'e^ ^.y FR ^ I
0
Purse Rev ew Meet rgs
Total Roadway Meetings I
0
Field Reviews
0 of Staff
SiteTi.. TravosTime
r staff)
Total Hours
F ,old Review ✓r1
Feld Renew 42
L
0
Fend Review 113
0
0
0
0
Fold Renew 04
0
0
0
0
Rana -n -nand Field Revlaw
0
0
0
0
Total PWW ROnMw How
0
Representing Print Name Slgnatrae l Dab
FCC - -�: s trict —_—�
Consultant Norm
Talk Project Parameter Staff Hours
Documentation
No Task
Description Units Complexity
Calculated Department Consultant Negotiated
Provide documentation when negotialod hours differ from the calculated hours.
What is the overall project complexity? (See Roadway Guidelines) Idn
Key Sheet
a i
0
Signature Sheet
2 0
2
0
Typical Sections
2 6
•
8
0
wl CADO
Typcal Sections
0 0
0
0
0
NA
52
Typcal Section. Sheets
wro CARD
Partial Sections
2 6
0
6
0
Oss,,o shod aeC0Vemeflt card gucrcCO I cetn I
assume rw cross slope corrector neocen
5.3
Cross Sine Correction Detals
pay ntt
0 0
0
0
0
5.4
General Notesmay Item Notes
1 a0gls 6
0
6
0
Model Manegomeet
0 0
0
0
0
WA
5.5
project Layout
0 0
0
0
0
aesuns no cross slope correction needed
Sheet(s)
0 rid 0
0
0
0
WA
5.6
Plnn View (Plan Sheds)
Interchange
0 0
0
0
0
WA
Roundabout
0 0
0
0
0
WA
Sheet(s)
3 Flush Shoultler 9
0
9
0
5.7
Prone Vew /P ne Pvtile Sheets)
Sheet(s)
• Curbed 0
0
0
0
0oewey
Curb RMpm
0 C 0
e
0
WA
5.6
Specwl ProNets
Intersection
RR Xr
B 0
0
0
0
NIA
5.9
Sldewsee Profiles
SreaRs)
0 0
0
0
0
NIA
Starxlerd
0 0
0
0
0
NIA
5.f0
Interchange Layout Sheet
Interchange
2 Lewes
Complex
0 0
0
0
0
N/A
3- Lavats
Ramp Tarmmal
0 0
0
0
0
N,A
6.11
Detni�s
Intersection
0 - 0
•
0
0
NA
a
10
0
Assume 1 saeoa. ceta
Spada
1 90
5.12
Sal Survey Sheets
0 0
0
0
0
NA
5.13
Cross Seapns
30 1/0 11
0
11
0
TTC Notes
0 0
0
0
0
WA - TTCP pan to be provided by contractor
presng rides 0
Tynlrals Sfxxt(s)
0 0
0
0
•
WA - TTCP pan N/be provided by contractor
6.14
Temporary Traffic Control Plan
TTC Plan
0 Id 0
0
0
0
WA - TTCP plan lobe porn/den by cnntactcr
Sheol sl
cnbcal croca
Sactwns
0 0
o
e
0
WA - TTCP Wan lobe porldad by mnbaclar
TTc Deto to
0 0
0
0
0
N/A- TTCP Wan lobe ponidea by contnacror
515
Ubiny Adluatment Sheets
Slyd(s)
3 OY>•a " 18
0
/0
0
Assume 5 UAO. (SUndwd Co npl-ty)
5.10
Prgect Control Sheets
I): ) l S():
0 0
0
0
0
s 17
a D
0
0
Roadway Plans Technical 040UO luM080if 74
0
74
0
5 10
QUeiity Asst. ranre:Qsohly CorIrn
5% 1
0
'.
0
5.19
Suo—spr
1
Roadway Pt.nsTotall 82 0
82 0
Representing
Print Name
Signature Date
FOOT District
Consultant Name
Tusk
NoTask
Project Parameter Staff Hours Documentation
-------------------- __.. __
Description Unl Compie.ny Calculated DapartmMtt Consultant I Negotiated Provide documentation when negotiated hours differ from the calculated hours
6a ?
Base Clearance Analysis
Lrx;alxa»
0
(1
0
0
0
N:A
Report
0
0
0
-
0
0
NiA
6a 2
Hydroplaning Analysis
LS
0
0
0
0
0
WA
6a 3
Existing Permit Analysis
LS
1
Simple
4
0
4
0
6a 4
Utla[y Conflict Matrix (for drainage structures)
LS
1
Simple
4
0
4
0
6a 5
Noise Barrier Drainage Analysis
Wall Lergtn
(Miles)
0.00
0
0
0
0
WA
68 6
Temporary Drainage Analysis
LS
I
Simple
4
0
4
0
ha
Pond Siting Analysis and Report
Basins
0
0
0
0
0
WA
Report
0
0
0
0
0
NIA
he 8
Analysis of Pipe Video Inspection Report
LS
0
0
0
0
0
WA
Bridge Hydraulic Report [Canal Crossing or Pod Bridge)
Pea Bring or
0
0
0
0
0
NA
6a9
Bridge Hydraulic Report (Main Bridge Non -Tidal)
wio Relief
B'
1
Sanded
200
0
120
0
With Ralrol
Brl
0
0
0
0
0
NA
NoRne
1
80
0
40
0
Bridge Hydraulic Report (Main Bridge Tidal)
w:o Relief
Br
0
!landed
0
0
0
0
WA
Bh Relief
0
0
0
0
0
NA
No -Rise
0
0
0
0
0
N/A
Wave Modeling
Wave Modeling
0
Standard
0
0
0
0
N/A
6a 10
Design of Minor Cross Drams
Cross Drains
0
Simple
0
0
0
0
N/A
0
Standard
0
0
0
0
WA
0
Complex
0
0
0
0
NIA
Design of Mapr Cross Drams
Cross Drains
0
Simple
0
0
0
0
N/A
0
Standard
0
0
0
0
WA
0
Complex
0
0
0
0
N/A
6a 1 1
Design of Ditches aril Side Dorms
Ditches (Mss)
0.00
Simple
0
0
0
0
WA
0.00
Standard
0
0
0
0
WA
0.00
Complex
0
0
0
0
N/A
Side Drains
0
0
0
0
0
N/A
N
CM
=
,
0
:
=
R
=
_
=
0
,
,
=
,
=
a
-
,
_
_
§ :
R
=
=
-
:-
>--
{
)
{
'
®
&!%|&;
&
(
t
-
}
§
}
}
\
}
/
{
{
_
!
$
7
3
=
-
-
_
&
}
}
\
\
}
\
\
\
(
{,
��
}«
cc
i
#
\
jl2j§§�
Subtotal Technical Meotings
0 0
Progress Meetings fA required by FOOT ;
I
Phes. Rever' Mewing.
Total Drainage Meetings
0 0
01
Field Reviews
# of Stall
Site Time
Travel Time
Total Hours
(per staff)
(per stall
F leld Review#t
C
Field Review#2
Field Review#3
G
Field Review Y4
fv.
Plars-in-Hard Field Revie
I
Total Field Review Hours 0
6b. Drainage Plans
Ieuc
a i1 T1T1iE[.ij
Representing
Print Name Signature! Date
FOOT District
Consultant Name
r r
Task
Project Parameter Staff Hours Documentation
Took
Description
---
Units Complexity
j
Calculated
Department
Consultant
Negotiated Provide documentation when eegm and hours differ from the calculated hours
No.
65'
(Drainage Map (Including ln;erchanges)
Shoes. -.
32
a
16
0
6b.2
Bridge Hydraulics Recommendation Sheets
Bridges
32
31
0
-
0
Drainage
12
0
3U
0
fib 3
Drainage Structures
Structures
Details
0
0
0
0
N -A
n
0
, scar^
0
0
0
0
NA
Ditches
0
Comp xe.
u
0
0
0
NIA
654
Lat.M Dltclus
Cruss Section
0
`:;.
0
0
0
NiA
Alignments
-
0
Standard
i.--
0
0
0
NiA
Pond,
0
Complex
________
0
0
0
0
_____________________________________________________________________
N/A
6b.S
Retention+Detwmor^. Floodplam Compensation Ponds
Cross Section
0
0
0
0
0 N -A
All nmeMs
Drainage Plans Technical Subtotal
95
0
78
0
6b.6
Ouelity Assurance+ouality Control
%
•
5%
5
0
e
0
6b.7
Supervision
%
5%
5
0
4
0
Drainage Plans Total
105
0
00
0
084019_ CR5050vemSebaelan_SHE MASTER v3
6o Druirage Plain Page 12 01 21 1l1.2'J2b
Project Activity 7: Utilities
Estimator ,i. Cellar
CR-505/Roseland Road over Sebastian River Prong (Bridge No. 884019) Bridge Replacement
Representing Print Name Signature / Date
FDOT District
Consultant Name
NOTE: Signature Block is optional, per District preference
Task
No.
Task
Units
No of Units
Hoursl Unit
Total
Hours
Comments
7.1
Utility Kickoff Meeting
LS
1 6
6
Meeting is listed below
7.2
Identify Existing Utility Agency Owner(s)
LS
1
1 L
10
5 UAO .2 hrs Consultant shall contact Sunshine 811, perform a field visit, and review prior FDOT
utility permits, reports, existing plans, and surveys provided.
7.3
Make Utility Contacts
LS
1
15
15
(FPL - Distribution, FPL - Subaqueous, Indian River County Utilities, ATT, & Comcast)
3 contacts ' 5 utilities
7.4
Exception Processing
LS
1
0
0
7.5
Preliminary Utility Meeting
LS
1
0
0
Meeting is listed below
7.6
Individual/Field Meetings
LS
1
0
0
Meetings are listed below
7.7
Collect and Review Plans and Data from UAO(s)
LS
1
10
5 UAO ` 2 hrs per markup
7.8
Subordination of Easements Coordination
LS
1
0
0
N/A
7.9
Utility Design Meeting
LS
1
0
0
Meeting is listed below
7 10
Review Utility Markups & Work Schedules, and
Processing of Schedules & Agreements
LS
1
G
0
N/A
7.11
Utility Coordination/Followup
LS
1
10
10
5 UAO .2 hrs
7.12
Utility Constructability Review
LS
1
0
0
N/A
7.13
Additional Utility Services
LS
1
0
0
N/A
7.14
Processing Utility Work by Highway Contractor (UWHC)
LS
1
0
0
7.15
Contract Plans to UAO(s)
LS
1
5
5
5 UAO
7.16
Certification/Close-Out
LS
1
10
10
5 UAO * 2 hrs
884019_CR505OverSebastianSHE MASTER_v3
7. Utilities Page 13 ,if 27 7'712026
Protect Activity 7: Utilities
7 17 Other Utilities LS
7. Utilities Total 66
Technical Meetings
Units
No of Units
Hours/ Unit
Total
Hours
Comments
PM Attendance at
Meeting Required?
Number
Kickoff (see 7.t)
EA
1
6
6
2 attendees' (meeting prep 1 hr + 1 hr meeting minutes +t
Pc
hour meeting)
Preliminary Meeting (see 7.5)
EA
0
0
0
0
Individual UAO Meetings (see 7.6)
EA
0
0
0
0
Field Meetings (see 7.6)
EA
0
0
0
0
Design Meeting (see 7.9)
EA
0
0
0
0
Other Meetings (this is automatically added into Utilities Total
EA
0
0
0
0
(cell F27))
Total Meetings
6
Total Project Manager Meetings (carries to Tab 3)
1
wt
884019_CR505OverSebastlan_SHE_MASTER_v3
7, Utilities P,3ge ', 6 nr 27 7/7/2026
Estimator: J. Barkley CR-505/Roseland Road over Sebastian River Prong (Bridge No. 884019) Bridge Replacement
Representing Print Name Signature I Date
FDOT District
Consultant Name
NOTE: Signature Block is optional, per District preference
Task
Task
Units
No. of
Hours/
Total
Comments
No.
Units
Units
Hours
Environmental Permits and Environmental Clearances
8.1
Preliminary Project Research
LS
1
/1
8
Desktop review
Permits
8.2
Field Work
8.2.1
Pond Site Alternatives
per pond site
0
0
0
N/A
8.2.2
Establish Wetland Jurisdictional Lines and
LS
1
20
20
Travel to/from site, assess conditions
Assessments
8.2.3
Species Surveys
LS
1
4
4
Conduct bridge bat survey, confirm presence/absence species/habitat
8.3
Agency Verification of Wetland Data
LS
1
0
0
N/A
8.4
Complete And Submit All Required Permit Applications
8 4 1
Complete and Submit All Required Wetland Permit
Applications
LS
1
12
12
Prepare self -certification package
Pa p ge and submit in USACE RRS
8 4 2
Complete and Submit All Required Species Permit
LS
1
0
0
N/A
Applications
8.5
Coordinate and Review Dredge and Fill Sketches
LS
1
0
0
N/A
8.6
Complete and Submit Documentation for Coordination and/or USCG Bridge Permit Application
B 6 1
Prepare and submit required documents for USCG
LS
1
16
16
Prepare documentation for request of USCG Advanced Approval
P
coordination
8.6.2
Complete and submit USCG Bridge Application
LS
1
0
0
N/A
Prepare Water Management District or Local Water
8.7
Control District Right of Way Occupancy Permit
LS
1
0
0
N/A
Application
8 8
Prepare Coastal Construction Control Line (CCCL)
LS
1
0
0
N/A
Permit Application
88401 9CR505overSebastian_SHE_MASTER_v3
8. Env. Permits and Clearances Page 15 of 27 7,7/2026
Task
No.
Task
Units
No. of
Units
Hoursl
Units
Total
Hours
Comments
89
Prepare USACE Section 408 Application to After a
Civil Works Project
LS
1
0
0
N/A
8.10
Compensatory Mitigation Plan
LS
1
0
0
N/A
8.11
Mitigation Coordination and Meetings
LS
1
0
0
N/A
8.12
Regulatory Agency Support
LS
1
2
2
Coordination/RAI support
8.13
Other Environmental Permits
LS
1
0
0
N/A
Environmental Clearances, Reevaluations, and Technical Support
8 14
Technical support to the Department for Environmental Clearances and Reevaluations (use when
consultant provides technical support only)
8.14.1
NEPA or SEIR Reevaluation
LS
1
0
0
N/A
8.14.2
Archaeological and Historical Resources
LS
1
0
0
N/A
8.14.3
Section 4(f), 6(f), and ARC
LS
1
0
0
N/A
8.14.4
Wetland Impact Analysis
LS
1
8
8
Complete Environmental Report to support self -certification permit
8.14.5
Essential Fish Habitat Impact Analysis
LS
1
1
1
Complete Environmental Report to support self -certification permit
8.14.6
Protected Species and Habitat Impact Analysis
LS
1
1
1
Complete Environmental Report to support self -certification permit
8 15
Preparation of Environmental Clearances and Reevaluations (use when consultant prepares all
documents associated with reevaluation)
8.15.1
NEPA or SEIR Reevaluation
LS
1
0
0
N/A
8.15.2
Archaeological and Historical Resources
LS
1
0
0
N/A
8.15.3
Section 4(f). 6(f), and ARC
LS
1
0
0
N/A
8.15.4
Wetland Impact Analysis
LS
1
0
0
N/A
8.15.5
Essential Fish Habitat Impact Analysis
LS
1
0
0
N/A
8,15.6
Protected Species and Habitat Impact Analysis
LS
1
0
0
N/A
Contamination Analysis
8.16
Contamination Impact Analysis
LS
1
0
0
N/A
8.17
Asbestos Survey
LS
1
0
0
N/A
884019 CR505OverSebastian_SHE_MASTER_v3
8. Env. Permits and Clearances Page 16 of 27 717/2026
Project Activity 8: Environmental Permits
Task
No.
Task
Units
No. of
Units
Hours/
Units
Total
Hours
Comments
Environmental Permits and Environmental Clearances/Reevaluations Technical
Subtotal
72
8.18
Technical Meetings
LS
1
0
0
8.19
Quality Assurance/Quality Control
LS
%
5%
4
8.20
Supervision
LS
%
5"
4
Environmental Permits and Environmental Clearances Nontechnical Subtotal
8.21 Coordination LS 35,
8
2
8. Environmental Permits and Environmental Clearances Total
82
Technical Meetings
Units
No of
Units
Hours/
Unit
Total
Hours
PM Attendance at
Comments
Meeting Required?
Number
WMD
EA
0
0
0
0
NMFS
EA
0
0
0
0
USACE
EA
0
0
0
0
USCG
EA
0
0
0
0
USFWS
EA
0
0
0
0
FFWCC
EA
0
0
0
0
FOOT
EA
0
0
0
0
Other Meetings
EA
0
0
0
0
Subtotal Technical Meetings
0
Subtotal Project Manager Meetings
f1
Progress Meetings (if required by FOOT)
EA
0
0
0
PM attendance of Progress Meetings is manually entered on General Task 3
-
Phase Review Meetings
EA
0
0
0
PM attendance at Phase Review Meetings is manually entered on General Task 3
- -
Total Meetings
0
Total Project Manager Meetings (carries to Tab 3)
0
Carries to 9 18 Comes to Tab 3
884019 CR505OverSebastian_SHE_MASTERv3
8. Env. Permits and Clearances Page 17 of 27 7)7/2026
Project Activity 9: Structures Summary and Miscellaneous Tasks and Drawings
Fstiriato, L aowel' CR-5051Roseland Road over Sebastian River Prong (Bridge No. 884019) Bridge Replacement
Representing Print Name
Signature ! Date
FDOT District
^sjltant Name
rvuic. argnarure tlrocs rs oprronar, per ursrucr prererence
Nok
Task
Units
Design and Production Staffhours
Comments
No. of Units
Hours per
Unit
No. of Sheets
Total
General Drawings
9.1
Key Sheet and Index of Drawings
Sheet
1
4
1
4
Low range, single bridge
9.2
Project Layout
Sheet
0
0
0
0
N/A
9.3
General Notes and Bid Rem Notes
Sheet
1
12
1
12
Low range, simple bridge
9.4
Miscellaneous Common Details
Sheet
2
6
2
12
Load Rating Summary sheet & Signature sheet
9.5
Incorporate Report of Core Borings
Sheet
2
0.5
2
1
Single Bridge
9.6
Standard Plans- Bridges
LS
1
2
2
9.7
Existing Bridge Plans
LS
1
0
0
If available
9.8
Structures Quantites for EQ Report
Bridges
1
Calculated Hours
16
16
Wails
0
Box Culverts
0
9-9
Cost Estimate
LS
1
Fi
8
Assume 2 updates as needed
9.10'
Technical Special Provisions and Modified Special
Provisions
LS
1
0
Structures - Summary and Miscellaneous Tasks and Drawings
6
55
Task
No.
Task
Total
Task 10
Task 11
Task 12
Task 13
Task 14
Task 15
Task 16
Task 17
Task 18
10-16
Bridge 1
536
36
0
500
0
0
0
0
10-16
Bridge 2
0
10-16
Bridge 3
0
884019_CR 5050verSebastian_SHE_ MASTE R_v3
9. Structures Summary Page 18 of 27 7172026
Project Activity 9: Structures Summary and Miscellaneous Tasks and Drawings
10-16
Bridge 4
0
10-16
Bridge 5
0
10-16
Bridge 6
0
10-16
Bridge 7
0
10-16
Bridge 8
0
10-16
Bridge 9
0
10-16
Bridge 10
0
17
Retaining Walls
0
0
18
Miscellaneous Structures
0
0
Structures Technical Subtotal
536
36
0
500
0
0
0
0
0
0
Task
No.Unit
Task
Units
No. UnitsHours
of
per
Total
Comments
9.11
Field Reviews
LS
1
8
90% Plans in hand field review
9.12
Technical Meetings
LS
1
8
8
Meetings are listed below
9.13
Quality Assurance/Quality Control
LS
o
10%
59
9.14
Independent Peer Review
LS
1
0
0
9-15
Supervision
LS
5%
30
Structures Nontechnical Subtotal
105
9.16 Coordination 1
20
Cooridnation with other disciplines, geotechnical engineer, Hydraulic Engineer
9. Structures - Summary and Miscellaneous Tasks and Drawin s
Technical Meetings
Units
No of Units
Hours/ Unit
Total Hours
Comments
PM Attendance
at Meeting
Required?
Number
BDR CoordinationiReview
EA
1
2
2
Virtual Attendcnce
0
90/100% Comment Review
EA
1
2
2
Virtual Atlendence
0
Aesthetics Coordination
EA
0
0
0
0
Regulatory Agency
EA
0
0
0
0
Local Governments (cities, counties)
EA
0
0
0
0
884019_CR505OverSebastian_SHE_MASTE R_v3
9. Structures Summary Page 19 of 27 7/712026
Project Activity 9: Structures Summary and Miscellaneous Tasks and Drawings
Utility Companies
EA
2
2 Virtual Attendcncc
U
Other Meetings
EA
i
0
0
0
Subtotal Technical Meetings
6
I
0
Progress Meetings {if required by FDOT)
EA
U
0
0
PM attendance at Progress Meetings is manually entered on General Task 3
-
Phase Review Meetings
EA
2
2
PM attendance at Phase Review Meetings is manually entered on General Task 3
- -
Total Meetings
8
Total Project Manager Meetings (carries to Tab 3)j
0
{ amc. Ic v. I: ( arte> a Tab i
884019_C R505OverSebastian_SHE_MASTER_v3
9. Structures Summary Page 20 of 27 7!7/2026
Project Activity 10: BDR
Estimator: L. Powell
Bridge Identifier (Number or Name): 884019
C-bRoseland I1oad over Scbast— R vcr Prong iBrdgc No 8840'.'31 Bodge Rcolaoemcnt
Representing
Print Name
Signature I Date
Ft i Jr District
Consultant Name
Null:: signature Block is optional, per vistrict preference
Task
No.General
Task
Units
No of Units
Hours/ Unit
No. of
Sheets
Total Hours
Comments
Requirement
10 1
Bridge Geometry
LS
1
12
12
Finalize bridge geometry with respect to typical section/hydraulics - single span FSB vs. Two Span FSB
10 2
Ship Impact Data Collection
LS
1
2
2
Provide information for USCG Bridge Questionnaire only - non navigable. Will need clearance information
103
Ship Impact Criteria
EA
0
0
0
N/A
Superstructure Alternatives
10.4
Short Span Concrete Bridge
EA ALT
0
0
0
N+A - go with FSB per IRC
10.5
Medium Span Concrete Bridge
EA ALT
0
0
0
NIA
10 6
Long Span Concrete Bridge
EA ALT
0
0
0
N/A
10.7
Structural Steel Bridge
EA ALT
0
0
0
NA
Foundation & Substructure Alternatives
10.8
Pier/Bent
EA Type
1
6
6
Pile Bents only
10.9
Shallow Foundations i GRS Abutments
EA Type
1
8
8
Evaluate GRS-lBS - dependent on Hydraulics
10.10
- -
Deep Foundations
EA
Foundation
Evaluated
1
8
8
Use smallest pile alternative based on geotechnical parameters
Movable Span
10.11
Data Collection and Design Criteria
LS
1
0
0
N/A
10.12
Movable Span Geometries and Clearances
LS
1
0
0
N/A
10.13
Deck System Evaluation
LS
1
0
0
N/A
10.14
Framing Plan Development
LS
1
0
0
NIA
10.15
Main Girder PreliminaryDesign
LS
1
0
0
N/A
10.16
Conceptual Span Balance/Counterweight
LS
1
0
0
N/A
884019_CR505OverSebestian_SHE_MASTER_v3
10. Strictures-BDR Page 21 of 27 7/712026
Protect Activity 10: BDR
Task
No.Sheets
Task
Units
No of Units
Hours/ UnitNo
of
Total Hours
Comments
10.17
Support System Development
LS
1
0
0
N/A
10.18
Drive Power Calculations
LS
1
0
N/A
10.19
Drive System Development
I S
1
0
N/A
10.20
Power and Control Development
LS
1
0
0
N/A
10.21
Conceptual Pier Design
LS
1
0
0
N/A
10.22
Foundation Analysis (FL PIER)
LS
1
0
0
N/A
10.23
Tender Visibility Study
LS
1
0
0
N/A
Other BDR Issues
10.24
Aesthetics
LS
1
0
0
N/A
10.25
TTCP/Staged Construction Requirements
LS
1
0
0
N/A
10.26
Constructibility Requirements
LS
1
0
0
N/A
10.27
Load Rating for damaged/widened structures
EA Unit
1
0
0
N/A
10.28
Quantity and Cost Estimates
EA ALT
0
0
0
WA
10.29
Quantityand Cost Estimates - Movable Span
LS
1
0
0
N/A
1030
Wall Type Justification
LS
1
0
0
N/A
Report Preparation
10.31
Exhibits
EA SHEET
0
0
0
N/A
10.32
Exhibits - Movable Span
EA SHEET
0
0
0
N/A
10.33
Report Preparation
LS
1
0
0
N/A
10.34
Report Preparation- Movable Span
LS
1
0
0
WA
10.35
BDR Submittal Package
LS
1
0
0
N/A
10. Structures - Bridge Development Report Total
36
When ONLY 30% plans are final deliverable, use Task Nos. as shown for applicable bridge types for project Activities 12 thru 16. Stafhours to be negotiated and scaled appropriately.
884019_ CR505Ove.Sehastian_SHE_ VASTER_,3
10. Stn,cn,res-0[)R Pace 22 of 27 7r7 7026
Protect Activity 12: Structures. Short Span Concrete
Estimator' L. Powell CR-505'Rosalanf Road over Sebastian River Prong (Bridge Na 8860191 Bridge Redacemenl
Bridge Identifier (Number or Name): 884019
Representing
Print Metro
Signature I Oaf
DUI Dislru
Cons:rttant Nadu
nut c.: aryne— OIGCR IS oprronar, per tnsrncr prererence
Task
No
Task
Units
No. Of
Units
Hours/ Unit
No. of
Sheets
Total
Hours Comments
General Layout Design and Plans
12.1
Overall Bridge Final Geometry
LS
slr.v :rrirgeino skew
12.2
12.3
ExpansiortContracvon Analysis
General Plan and Elevation
CA Umt
Sheet
2
2
Poured pint at beginlene o iux
Straigheno skew
28
1
28
12.4
Construct -on Staging
Sheet
0
0
0
NIA closure
12.5
Approach Slab Plan and Details
Sheet
8
1
a
Use 2011 slardar:ls
¶26
Miscellaneous Details Sheet r.i1 6 72 Riprap sdedts uln by orange, 001111 s
End Bent Design and Plans
127
End Bent Geometry
EA End Bent
_
8
Normal end mnoiton
126
End Bent Structural Design
EA Design
14
14
One similar design
12.9
End Bent Plan and Elevation
Sheet
,
16
2
32
Ndmal end oondillon
12.10
End Bent Details
Sheet
2
1^
2
20
End beret sedionsrbookwalth iegeell sheets
Intermedlata Bent Design and Plans
12.11
Bent Geometry
EA Bent
a
4
Normal end condition (one IB et mast)
12.12
Bent Stability Analysis
EA Analyse
14
14
one analysis for scour condition
12.13
Bed Structural Design
EA Design
1
is
16
One slmdar design
12.14
Bent Plan and Elevation
Sheet
1
16
1
16
Assume one sheet with table of elevations as needed
12.15
Bent Detects
Sheet
1
12
1
12
One sheet for sections
ae41119 CRSOsOers Senaaban_SHEMASTER v3
12. Snot Span Conernre gage 2:s c421 7A7202a
Protect Activity 12: Structures. Short Span Concrete
Task
No.
Task
Units
No. of
Units
Hours! Unit
No. of
Sheets
Total
Hours
Comments
Miscellaneous Substructure Design and Plans
12 16
Fr nnrnon Layout Shell i4 2 26 Nomhel end cordildn
Miscellaneous Superstructure Design and Plans
12,17
Finish Grade Elevation Calculation
LS
1
12
12
Constant width
12.18
Fnish Grad. Elacabans
Sum
2
12
2
24
Aswane Mo awtslada&typcals mcludng approahc slabs
CaMdrnPlace Slab Bridges
12.19
Brdge Deck Dos',
FA lint
0
0
0
N/A
12,20
Superslntaure Plan
Sheet
0
0
0
0
N/A
12.21
Supersty cluroSectoos and Details
Sheet
0
0
0
0
N/A
Prestressed Slab Unit Bridges
1222
Prestressed Slab Unit Design
LA Desgn
2
/6
32
1Msrlor/Extericr FSB Beam Dasgns
12,23
Prestrxsnd Slab Unit Layout
Sheets
1
12
1
12
Beam layout
12.24
Preshassed Slab Un t Dota/s and Schedule
Shoat
2
24
2
48
Beam Tables & Datans
12.25
Deck Topping Reinforcing LayckA
Sheet
12
1
12
Normal Ends
12.26
SupersUucluro Sections ano Details
cruet
2
16
2
32
Typical section,,'slab dehechor, ddtans. sidewalk sections
Reinforcing Bar List
12.27
Preparation of Remfaong Bar 1st Sheet 2 2 16 Asaurne two enacts
Load Rating -- ------------- -----
12.28
Load Ratings LA unit ..
32
FSB"s
12. Structures • Short Span Concrete Bridge Total
26
500
e 4o1a_CR.WSbrerSeeesuan SHE_MASrER_v3
12. Salt Span Conoea i_-:-t n : r �]?72R
Project Activity 19: Signing and Pavement Marking Analysis
Estimator: J. Geller CR-505/Roseland Road over Sebastian River Prong (Bridge No. 884019) Bridge Replacement
Representing
Print Name
Signature / Date
FDOT District
Consultant Namc
nuts. aignarure nrocs is opoonar, perursrncr prererence
Task
No.
Task
Units
No. of
Units
Hours/
Units
Total
Hours
Comments
19.1
Traffic Data Analysis
LS
0
N/A
19.2
No Passing Zone Study
LS
1
0
0
N/A
19.3
Signing and Pavement Marking Master Design File
LS
1
23
23
16 hrs for setup + 40 hr/mi (assume 0.16mi) 16+7= 23
19.4
Multi -Post Sign SupportCalculations
EA
it
0
N/A
19.5
Sign Panel Design Analysis
EA
0
0
NSA
19.6
Sign Lighting/Electrical Calculations
EA
0
0
NSA
19.7
S&PM Quantities for ED Report
Length (Miles)
0.1G
Calculated
Hours
15
1
Complexity
Low Ranyr,
Interchanges
Rest Areas
19.8
Cost Estimate
LS
1
8
8
1 g 9
Technical Special Provisions and Modified Special
Provisions
LS
LS
1
1
n
0
U
NA
N/A
19.10
Other Signing and Pavement Marking
Signing and Pavement Marking Analysis Technical Subtotal
46
19.11
Field Reviews
LS
1
n
0
19.12
Technical Meetings
LS
1
0
0
Meetings are listed below
19.13
Quality Assurance/Quality Control
LS
%
5%
2
19.14
Independent Peer Review
LS
1,
0%
0
1915
Supervision
LS
%
2
Signing and Pavement Marking Analysis Nontechnical Subtotal
4
1916
Coordination
LS
%
3%
2
19. Signing and Pavement Marking Analysis Total
52
884019_ CR505OverSebastian_SHE MASTER v3
19. Signing & Marking Analysis page 25 of 27 7./720211
Project Activity 19: Signing and Pavement Marking Analysis
Task I No. of Hours/ Total
Task Units Comments
Units Units Hours
No.
Technical Meetings
Units
No of Units
Hours/ Unit
Total
Hours
Comments PM Attendance at Meeting Required?
Number
Sign Panel Design
EA
0
0
Queue Length Analysis
EA
0
0
Local Governments (cities, counties)
EAR
EA
0
0
Other Meetings
Subtotal Technical Meetings
0
Subtotal Project Manager Meetings
0
Progress Meetings (I required ny FDOT)
EA
0
PM attendance at Progress Meetings is manually entered or Gereral Task 3
- -
Phase Rev ew Meetings
EA
0
PM attendarce at Phase Review Meetings is manually entered or Gereral Task 3
Total Meetings
0
Total Project Manager Meetings (carries to Tab 3)
0
884019_CR505OverSebastianSHE--MASTER_v3
19. Signing & Marking Analysis Page 26 of 27 77/202k
ltlulmnn1
Representing
Print Name, Sign eture I Date
FOOT District
Consultant Name
Task
No.
Task
Project Parameter
Staff Hours Documentation
Description Units
Complexity
Calculated
Department
Consultant Negotiated Provide documentation when negotiated hours differ from the calculated hours.
201
Key Sheet
0
0
0
0
NA
SignatureSheel
-
i.
1
0
6
0
0
0
6
0
0
N
202
General Notes/Pay Item Noes
Shrtpte
20 3
Project Layout
Plan Sheet
0
12
0
0
0
12
0
0
NA
20 4
W
S91r0ersecion
k0d$bck Xing
0
0
0
0
0
WA
Interchange
Roundabout
0
0
0
0
0
WA
Rest Area
Toll Facilit
0
0
0
0
0
WA
205
Special Details
Details
0
Simple
0
0
0
0
WA
0
Standard
0
0
0
0
N'A
0
Complex
0
0
0
0
WA
20.6
Service Point Details
Pant
0
Simple
0
0
0
0
WA
0
Standard
0
0
0
0
WA
207
Guide Sign Data
Sign Panel
2
4
0
4
0
208
Cross Sections (Sign Installations)
Multi -post
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
WA
WA
Owed^
Structures
0
Standard
0
Complex
0
0
0
0
WA
S&PM Plans Technical Hours Subtotal
22
0
22
0
20 9
Quality Assurenca+Quality Control
.0
1
1%
2
0
2
0
20.10
Supernsral
..
1
5%
2
0
2
0
S&PM Plans Total
26
0
26
0
K«E
HOLTZ CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC.
July 17, 2026
Mr. Jaime Celler, PE
Consor, Inc.
2041 Vista Parkway, Suite 101
West Palm Beach, FL 33411
Subject: Roseland Bridge Water Main Relocation
Dear Jaime,
Holtz Consulting Engineers, Inc. (HCE) is pleased to submit our proposal for engineering services to assist
Consor with the Roseland Bridge project in Indian River County. This project includes the replacement
of an existing 12/16 -inch potable water main along Roseland Rd. that is installed as an aerial crossing
adjacent to an existing bridge that is planned to be replaced. The aerial crossing will be replaced with a
new 12/16 -inch water main to be installed attached to the new proposed bridge. The existing aerial
crossing pipe, concrete support and pilings will be removed and disposed of after the new water main is
in service.
The design elements are assumed to include the following:
• Approximately 300 linear feet of 12/16 -inch water main. Final pipeline lengths may increase
or decrease due to field conditions.
• The abandonment and removal of the existing 12/1 6 -inch water main, concrete support
structure and pilings.
SCOPE OF WORK
Consor has requested HCE provide engineering services including engineering design and permitting
support services related to the water main relocation for the Roseland Bridge Replacement project. This
scope of work does not include any surveying services, geotechnical services, or environmental
assessment services. It is assumed that Consor will provide HCE all required surveying and geotechnical
engineering information needed to complete the design of the water main relocation. Any environmental
assessment services needed for the permitting with the regulatory agencies are the responsibility of
Consor. Bidding support and engineering services during construction are not included under this scope,
however, these services can be provided under a separate authorization. Specific tasks include the
following:
1. Task I — Engineering Design Services
2. Task 2- Permitting Support Services
TASK I - DESIGN SERVICES
HCE shall prepare detailed drawings and specifications depicting the installation of the new 12/16 -inch
water main, connections to the existing water main, and the abandonment and/or removal of the existing
607 SW St. Lucie Crescent, Suite 103, Stuart, FL 34994
Office: (772) 919-4905 • Fax: (772) 919-4909
K4qF=
HOLTZ CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC.
water main, including the existing aerial crossing.. Indian River County details will be utilized. HCE will
coordinate a design kick-off meeting, conduct site visits, review information provided by Consor about
the existing water main and other utilities in the area, and attend meetings, as necessary. Drawings will be
prepared on a 1'=20' scale.
Approximately seven (7) design drawings will be provided for this project. The preliminary drawing list
is as follows:
G- 1 Cover and Index
G-2 Legend and General Notes
P-1 Demolition of Existing Water Main
P-2 Water Main Plan and Profile 1
P-3 Water Main Plan and Profile 2
D- I Details Sheet I
D-2 Details Sheet 2
HCE shall prepare the following submittals:
• 60% design including site plan and pipe layout, including proposed bore profile for review
and approval of the pipe layout plan and profile.
• 90% design including plans and specifications incorporating comments on the 60%
submittal.
• 100% design including signed and sealed plans and specifications incorporating comments
on the 90% submittal for public bidding.
• Engineer's opinion of probable construction cost, including pay items and quantities, to be
provided with each submittal.
TASK 2— PERMITTING SUPPORT SERVICES
HCE will provide permitting support services to Consor to aid in the issuance of the required permits for
this project. This support shall be limited to providing signed and sealed copies of the finalized water main
relocation plans, assistance in answering any requests for additional information that may arise during the
permitting process, and Utility Coordination with IRCU.
SECTION 2- DELIVERABLES
The following deliverables will be provided to Consor:
TASK
DELIVERABLE
QUANTITY
Task I— Engineering
60%, 90% and 100% Plans and
Electronic Files to include
Design Services
Specifications
PDF of Plans and CAD Files
of Plan Sheets, Specifications
shall be provided in both
Word and PDF Files
607 SW St. Lucie Crescent, Suite 103, Stuart, FL 34994
Office: (772) 919-4905 • Fax: (772) 919-4909
KBE
HOLTZ CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. .
Compensation for the tasks outlined above will be as follows:
TASK
ENGINEERING FEE
Task 1- Design Services
539,880.00 (Lump Suin)
Task 2— Permitting Support Services
55,770.00 (Lump Sum)
TOTAL
$45,650.00
SECTION 4— SCHEDULE
HCE's schedule will be concurrent with Consor's schedule for the project. Consor shall provide this
information to HCE upon Notice to Proceed.
SECTION 5- OBLIGATIONS
To assist in meeting the schedule and budget estimates contained in this Task Order, Consor will provide
the following:
1. Prompt review and comment on deliverables.
2. Attendance of key personnel at meetings.
3. Provide all available as -built information, GIS data, record drawings, and other documents that
will assist HCE in preparing Contract Documents.
4. Preparation and submittal of permit applications.
5. Provide survey in AutoCAD format.
We greatly appreciate the opportunity to assist Consor with this project.
Sincerely,
HO TZ CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC.
(fir
Christine Miranda, PE
Vice President
ACCEPTED BY:
Consor, Inc.
Date
607 SW St. Lucie Crescent, Suite 103, Stuart, FL 34994
Office: (772) 919-4905 • Fax: (772) 919-4909
Attachment A - Roseland Bridge Water Main Relocation
S � c
c
L f d +
Si O
%
E C 7 7 A
C'711 G"''11 SI MI C 1511 C�)tl --
1. Engineering Design
Services
Site Visits (2 fa I I Tour Each) with three team members each visit
6
6
6
S3.360.00
52,480.00
$39,880.00
Review Information
2
4
4
2
Cost Estimates
2
4
8
S2,940.00
Prepare 60"o Submittal
2
4
8
16
2
S5,520.00
Prepare 90°„ Submittals (Plans Specs(
4
8
32
64
2
$18,700.00
Finalize Bid Does, aka 100°-0
2
4
8
16
2
S5,520.00
2. Permitting Support
Provide Signed and Scaled Drawings
oc, o.
4
1
S .170.00
c r uv� rm
$5,770,00
26 40 70 106 7 50.00
1ICE Total Engineering Fee $45,650.0(1
$45,65()