HomeMy WebLinkAbout2026-174WORK ORDER 3
Develop Solid Waste Management Annual System Technologies and
Environmental Roadmap (MASTER) Plan
This Work Order Number 3 is entered into as of this 15th day of September, 2026, pursuant to that
certain Continuing Contract Agreement, dated April 4, 2023 ("Agreement"), by and between INDIAN
RIVER COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Florida ("COUNTY") and Geosyntec
Consultants, Inc. ("Consultant"), and in accordance with 287.055 F.S.
The COUNTY has selected the Consultant to perform the professional services set forth on Exhibit 1
(Scope of Work), attached to this Work Order and made part hereof by this reference. The
professional services will be performed by the Consultant for the fee schedule set forth in Exhibit B to
the Agreement (Fee Schedule), and within the timeframe more particularly set forth in Exhibit 1, all in
accordance with the terms and provisions set forth in the Agreement. Pursuant to paragraph 1.4 of the
Agreement, nothing contained in any Work Order shall conflict with the terms of the Agreement and
the terms of the Agreement shall be deemed to be incorporated in each individual Work Order as if
fully set forth herein.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Work Order
written above.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS . 131'.
OF IN R COUNTY s'
Deryl Loar, Chairman
Attest: Ryan L. Butler, Clerk of Court and Comptroller
By:
Deputy Clerk
Approved: 72
John A. Tit anich, ir., County A inistrator
CONSULTANT:
By:
Print Name:
Title: d2yab1 V- /
as of the date first
Approved as to form and legal sufficiency:
Je9iifer T. Shuler, County Attorney
EXHIBIT 1
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
Geosyntec
consultants
Mr. Himanshu Mehta, P.E.
Managing Director
Solid Waste Disposal District
Indian River County
1325 74th Avenue SW
Vero Beach, Florida 32968
3504 Lake Lynda Drive, suite 155
Orlando, Florida 32817
PH 321.244.1476
wti%w geosyntec.com
28 August 2026
Subject: Proposal to Develop IRC Solid Waste Management Annual System
Technologies and Environmental Roadmap (MASTER) Plan
Indian River County Class I and C&D Landfill
Vero Beach, Indian River County, Florida
Dear Mr. Mehta:
Geosyntec Consultants, Inc. (Geosyntec) is pleased to submit this proposal to the Indian River
County (IRC) Solid Waste Disposal District (SWDD) to provide professional services to develop
a Solid Waste Management Annual System Technologies and Environmental Roadmap
(MASTER) Plan for the Class I Landfill at the IRC Landfill (IRCL) facility located in Vero Beach,
Indian River County, Florida. The proposal presents the scope of work, schedule, and budget
estimate to develop the Solid Waste MASTER Plan. The proposal was prepared in response to a
meeting on April 28, 2026 between Geosyntec and SWDD. Geosyntec has prepared this proposal
as Exhibit 1 to Work Order No. 3 for the Agreement for Engineering Consulting Services for
Landfill Closure, Landfill Gas System Expansion, and Cell Construction dated 4 April 2023
(collectively referred to as the '°Agreement"), by and between INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, a
political subdivision of the State of Florida ("COUNTY") and Geosyntec ("CONSULTANT").
The remainder of this proposal presents: (1) project background; (ii) proposed scope of work; (iii)
anticipated schedule; and (iv) budget estimate.
PROJECT BACKGROUND
The IRCL facility is located in southern Indian River County, east of Interstate 95, south of Oslo
Road, and west of Rangeline Road in Vero Beach, Florida. The SWDD administers the
management and operation of the Class I landfill at the IRCL facility. The Class I Landfill includes
the closed Segment 1/Infill/Segment 2 vertical expansion, and active Segment 3 lateral expansion
(Segment 3). Additional on -site facilities include an inactive construction and demolition (C&D)
debris disposal area, yard waste area, single stream recycling building (clean cardboard and tires),
clean concrete and scrap metal yard, Styrofoam and loose film processing, leachate evaporator and
CROM tank, small load drop off area, fuel station, maintenance and landfill wash bays, and the
SWDD Administration & Operator building. On April 28, 2026, IRC SWDD requested Geosyntec
provide a proposal to develop a Solid Waste MASTER Plan.
P26115701RC Master Plan Proposal
ent!ineers I scientists I innovators
Mr. Himanshu Mehta, P. E.
28 August 2026
Page 2
PROPOSED SCOPE OF WORKS
This proposal covers professional engineering and planning services anticipated to develop the
IRCL Solid Waste MASTER Plan. The scope of work is based on Geosyntec's understanding of
the Project based on information provided by the SWDD. For budgeting purposes, the scope of
work has been divided into the following phases:
• Phase 1— General Consulting/Meeting Support/Project Management;
• Phase 2— Landfill Development, Sequencing, and Design Capacity Plan;
• Phase 3 — Site Operations Review; and
• Phase 4— Capital Recommendations.
The scope of work associated with each of these phases is briefly described below.
Phase 1: General Consulting/Meeting Support/Project Management
Phase 1 consists of three components: general consulting, meeting support, and project
management. Geosyntec will provide SWDD with consulting services necessary to initiate the
project. Geosyntec will prepare presentation graphics, engineering drawings, and other documents
required to support the Project's meetings and coordination activities.
A kickoff meeting with SWDD is proposed before the start of project activities so that the specific
project requirements can be discussed in person. In addition, monthly online review meetings will
be held with SWDD throughout the project duration to discuss progress. Following each meeting,
Geosyntec will prepare meeting minutes that document decisions reached in the meetings.
Additional project management activities will include: budget and schedule tracking, invoice
review, and project communications.
For the purpose of this budget estimate. Geosyntec has included one in person kickoff meeting
with SWDD and 5 monthly online meetings.
Phase 2: Landfill Development, Sequencing, and Design Capacity Plan
The IRCL is critical infrastructure that should be maximized to serve IRC residents for as far into
the future as feasible. In this Phase, Geosyntec will review relevant historic records and forecast
future waste receipt rates to project long-term facility needs. The layout of the existing facility will
be reviewed and a conceptual design for on -site expansion will be developed.
A final list of documents for review in this Phase will be agreed upon at or following the kick-off
meeting, after which Geosyntec will submit a written Request for Information (RFI) to IRC.
Geosyntec assumes that all pertinent documents will be provided in electronic format, preferably
PDF for document and AutoCAD for any drawing files within two weeks of receipt of the RFI.
P2611570\IRC Master Plan Proposal
engineers I scientists I innovators
Mr. Himanshu Mehta. P. E.
28 August 2026
Page 3
Task 1. Document Review and Stakeholder Engagement
This initial subtask will include review of documents that control and govern facility operations
and development, including grading plans, permit applications, permit documents and drawing
sets, operations plans, facility compliance inspection reports and notices of violation, closure
plans, utility easements, maximum observed groundwater elevation maps, and property ownership
restrictions. This subtask will also include a review of adjacent IRC-owned and privately owned
properties to evaluate their availability and suitability for landfill expansion. A final list of
documents for review will be agreed upon at or following the kick-off meeting, after which
Geosyntec will submit a written RFI to IRC. Geosyntec assumes that all pertinent documents will
be provided within two weeks in electronic format, preferably PDF, within two weeks of receipt
of the RFI.
In addition to reviewing IRCL documents, Geosyntec will engage stakeholders in the IRCL
operation to understand the impacts of the current IRCL layout on their respective operations (e.g.,
disposal operations, leachate evaporator operations, landfill gas management, or composting) or
planning strategies (e.g., rate setting or site development). IRCL stakeholders include Republic
Services, Inc.; Kessler Consulting, Inc; Kimley-Hom and Associates, Inc.; Heartland Water
Technology, Inc.; Atlas Organics, Inc., and NoPetro Energy Holdings, LLC. Geosyntec anticipates
one -hour calls with representatives from each of the stakeholders for this task.
Task 2. Facility Utilisation Review and Waste Projection
This task will include review and analysis of annual tonnage reports for municipal solid waste
(MSW) disposed at the IRCL from the last five years, scalehouse records from the last five years,
and volume -density reports from the last five years. Based on the records provided by IRCL,
Geosyntec will develop projections for MSW disposal rates for the next 30 years based on historic
waste acceptance tonnages, population projections, and tourism or other industry projections.
Projections will consider the possible impact of natural disasters, specifically hurricanes, on long-
term capacity. The projected MSW disposal rates will inform an estimation of remaining site life
for the currently permitted footprint as well as estimated additional service life for expansion
options developed in Tasks 3 and 4. Geosyntec assumes that all pertinent documents will be
provided within two weeks in electronic format, preferably Microsoft Excel spreadsheets, within
two weeks of receipt of the RFI.
Task 3. Onsite Expansion Options
For this task, Geosyntec will evaluate the current IRCL property to identify opportunities for
additional disposal capacity by reconfiguring infrastructure such as roadways, stormwater,
leachate management infrastructure, and other structures. This would also include evaluating
piggy-backing/lateral and vertical expansion configurations as well as waste mining opportunities
in the inactive C&D disposal area. For this task, Geosyntec will evaluate up to two expansion
P2611570 \IRC Master Plan Proposal
engineers i scientists I innovators
Mr. Himanshu Mehta, P. E.
28 August 2026
Page 4
footprint options on the existing IRCL property. For each option, we assume one conceptual site
plan with conceptual final cover grading will be generated.
Task 4. Adjacent Property Expansion Options
For this task, Geosyntec will evaluate surrounding privately -owned properties (that in theory may
be available for purchase by the SWDD) that could accommodate siting of a new landfill near
current operations. Properties for consideration include the undeveloped properties north and
south of the current IRCL. We assume that for this scenario Geosyntec will perform a "desktop"
level review of privately -owned properties. Geosyntec will not formally engage property owners
concerning expansion opportunities. For this alternative, Geosyntec will evaluate up to three
nearby property options. For each option, we assume one conceptual site plan with conceptual
final cover grading will be generated. For areas with wetlands, in the absence of a formal wetland
delineation, we will use the National Wetlands Inventory (NWI) to identify preliminary buffering
constraints.
Task S. Offsite Expansion Options
This scenario will include evaluating up to two prospective offsite greenfield sites that may meet
minimum criteria (minimum acreage, 62-701 siting criteria, environmental, accessibility, etc.).
Geosyntec will give priority to IRC-owned greenfield sites and will also conduct a desktop -level
search of third party -owned sites if necessary. For each option, we assume one conceptual site plan
with conceptual final cover grading will be generated.
Task 6. Expansion Options Memorandum
The Expansion Options Memorandum will summarize the results of the analyses performed in
Tasks 3 through 5. This memorandum will serve as a resource for SWDD to decide on a
preferential expansion option to for the Landfill Development and Sequencing Plan to be
completed in Task 7. The Expansion Options Memorandum will include:
• Site characteristics (e.g., proximity to water bodies, wetlands, floodplains, airports,
conservation easements, and domestic and public water supplies; regional geologic and
hydrogeologic conditions; utilities) that would affect the design and permitting of a landfill
for each of the offsite options.
• Estimated site procurement, design, permitting, and construction costs for each option.
• A decision matrix comparing the siting alternatives.
Task 7. Landfill Development and Sequencing Plan
Geosyntec will complete a Pre -Design Study for expansion of IRCL following the Task 6 report
that will: (1) address spatial compatibility of the expansion with existing property boundaries,
utility easements, and proposed component facility development and other site improvements
P261 I5701IRC Master Plan Proposal
engineers I scientists I innovators
Mr. Himanshu Mehta,. P. E.
28 August 2026
Page 5
under the Solid Waste MASTER Plan, (2) assess the proposed sequence of landfill expansion
phasing, including transitions between active cells to allow ramps for truck disposal access and
best practices to sequence cell opening and closure to minimize leachate generation, (3) conduct a
soil balance calculation based on excavation of landfill cells to assess the availability and usage of
on -site soils for landfill cover material and other site projects, including the design requirements
for a soil stockpile area outside the proposed landfill limits, and (4) assess the proposed sequence
of stormwater management (SWM) system development and construction for the landfill
expansion, including preliminary estimates of size and location for SWM features. This study will
begin with the current layout of the IRCL facility so that the potential benefits of near -term
reconfigurations are considered. Follow-up meetings with the stakeholders listed in Task 1 will be
held to gauge how proposed expansion opportunities developed in Tasks 2 through 6 may impact
their operations or planning strategies.
Task 8. Conceptual Expansion Report
The Phase 2 report will include the following:
• Projections of MSW quantities for the next 30 years, including estimates of tonnage of
waste disposed of annually per person and per household. Projections will be benchmarked
in comparison to national averages.
• A landfill development plan, including:
o Conceptual cell layout and sequencing plan with locations of stormwater
infrastructure.
o Conceptual bottom grading plan.
o Conceptual final grading plan, including stormwater conveyance and controls.
o Conceptual fill plan.
o Temporary soil stockpile size and location.
• Cell development criteria including cell depths, separation from groundwater, waste lift
thicknesses, in -place waste densities, total airspace, and elevations of cell low and high
points.
• Estimated lifespan of the IRCL as currently permitted and with the conceptual expansion.
• Discussion of best practices to sequence cell opening and closure to minimize leachate
generation.
• Soil balance calculation to estimate material available on -site versus daily, intermediate,
and closure material needs.
• Discussion of proposed accommodations for stakeholders' operations.
P2611570',IRC Master Plan Proposal
engineers I scientists I innovators
Mr. Himanshu Mehta, P. E.
28 August 2026
Page 6
Phase 3: Site Operations Review
Optimized site operations can lead to reduced costs, improved safety, and positive public
perception for SWDD. In this Phase, Geosyntec will review facilities, traffic patterns, staffing,
equipment, and operational practices at IRCL. The operational elements reviewed will be
benchmarked against similar facilities and recommendations for improvements will be made.
Phase 3 will be completed concurrent with Phase 2 in order to inform expansion and sequencing
plans.
Task 1. Site Visit
Geosyntec's project manager (Tim Copeland) and task lead (Sarah Gustitus-Graham) will perform
a two-day site visit to coincide with the kickoff meeting. During the site visit, Geosyntec will
review the current layout and operations at IRCL and will meet with and interview facility staff
and contractors. The site visit will include a review of the scalehouse, the working face, the small
load dropoff area, the yard waste area, the recyclables processing areas, and the concrete and scrap
metals area.
Task 2. Traffic Study
Following the initial site visit, Geosyntec will conduct two days of on -site observations and
recording of traffic flow patterns at IRCL for various public and commercial users. These
observations will help Geosyntec understand vehicle flow patterns and facility usage and identify
traffic bottlenecks, queuing and unloading issues, and potentially hazardous interactions between
site personnel and public and commercial users. Scheduling of traffic observation days will be
coordinated with the SWDD so that Geosyntec can observe and record the specific challenges
associated with busy time periods (e.g.. during special events or busy weekend days). Geosyntec
will complete a brief Task Hazard Analysis (THA) in accordance with the firm's health and safety
protocols to provide for the safety of the site observation team. The THA will be shared with the
SWDD ahead of the site observations. The site observation team will comprise two Geosyntec
professionals for two days.
Task 3. Review of Staffing and Equipment
This task will include a review of current staffing levels for IRCL operations including the
scalehouse, recycling, building maintenance, site maintenance, fleet maintenance, litter control,
leachate collection, leachate evaporation, and landfill gas collection. Staffing levels will be
benchmarked against other similar facilities and industry standards, with a specific focus on
facilities that contract disposal management to a third party, similar to SWDD's contract with
Republic services, and/or contract leachate treatment to a third party, similar to SWDD's contract
with Heartland.
P2611570IRC Master Plan Proposal
engineers I scientists I innovators
Mr. Hirnanshu Mehta, P. E.
28 August 2026
Page 7
This task will also include a review of equipment currently owned by SWDD at IRCL for all onsite
operations. The amount, size, and type of equipment owned, as well as current waste densities and
airspace utilization factors will be benchmarked against similar sites and industry standards.
Task 4. Phase 3 Report
The Phase 3 report will include the following information and will clearly define industry best
practices:
• An assessment of current site operations with respect to industry best practices including
recommendations to improve operations. Recommendations may include capital
improvements.
• An assessment of onsite facilities with recommendations on additions, renovations, or
changes in operation.
• Results of the traffic study, including an analysis of public disposal and recycling areas
with commentary on traffic flows and queuing as well as recommendations to limit public
travel into the landfill area without reducing services offered.
• A staffing assessment, including benchmarking against similar sites and recommendations
on revision to job descriptions to better match work and areas needed.
• An equipment assessment, including benchmarking against similar sites.
• An analysis of compaction and airspace utilization.
Phase 4: Capital Recommendations
This phase will serve as a summary of the capital impacts of recommendations made in Phases 2
and 3. Geosyntec will compile recommended capital and operational improvements from the
previous phases into a comprehensive 20 -year Solid Waste MASTER Plan for IRCL. The capital
improvement plan will include the capital items recommended in previous Phases and the leachate
system assessment, including leachate system improvements and landfill expansion, as well as the
operational costs and impacts of these changes. The plan will include assumptions related to these
capital and operational expenses. The plan will not include annual maintenance items, such as
regular equipment replacement due to end of life.
The capital improvement plan developed under this task will be compared to the capital
improvement plan considered as part of a rate study developed for SWDD by Kessler Consulting
in 2023 (2023 Rate Study). The 2023 Rate Study precipitated the Solid Waste rate increases
implemented on 1 October 2023. The changes in capital improvement plan from the 2023 Rate
Study to the current proposed capital improvement plan will be assessed and Geosyntec will make
high-level recommendations on the timeline on which SWDD should reassess rates to cover
changes in projected capital expenses.
The completed Solid Waste MASTER Plan will be delivered to SWDD as both electronic and.
physical copies, with the latter sent to the IRC SWDD office.
P2611570\IRC Master Plan Proposal
engineers f scientists i innovators
Mr. Himanshu Mehta, P. E.
28 August 2026
Page 8
SCHEDULE
Geosyntec estimates the total duration of this project to be five months. This estimate assumes that
SWDD provides documents requested in requests for information within two weeks of the RFI
described in Phase 2 being provided. The kickoff meeting and first site visit can be scheduled
within two weeks of notice to proceed (NTP).
The following assumptions were used by Geosyntec in developing the budget estimate presented
below:
• The total project duration will be five months from NTP.
• All hours worked on the Project will be invoiced at the rates indicated in the detailed budget
estimate with no premium charged for overtime.
• Geosyntec will minimize courier fees by exchanging information between SWDD and
Geosyntec via e-mail and follow-up by regular mail. However, some express shipments
may be unavoidable. Although not included in this budget estimate, all shipping or other
similar communication fees incurred will be invoiced at cost plus markup in accordance
with the rate schedule.
• Geosyntec proposes to provide a rental/company vehicle for use by Geosyntec personnel
on site at a daily unit rate of $150. Due to recent volatility in fuels costs, the daily unit rate
for this vehicle does not include the costs of fuel and tolls.
A budget estimate for the scope of work outlined in Phases 1 through 4 of this proposal is
summarized below, with a detailed budget estimate provided as Attachment A.
SUMMARY BUDGET
Phase 1: General. Consulting/Meeting Support/Project Management $36,079.02
Phase 2: Landfill Development, Sequencing and Design Capacity Plan $127,411.50
Phase 3: Site Operations Review $67,609.50
Phase 4: Capital Recommendations $14,630.50
TOTAL $245,730.52
Geosyntec will not exceed the budget estimate without prior approval and written authorization
from SWDD.
CLOSURE
Geosyntec appreciates this opportunity to offer our services. If this proposal is acceptable, please
indicate your agreement by signing the attached work authorization, which references this
P26115701IRC Master Plan Proposal
engineers I scientists I innovators
Mr. Himanshu Mehta, P. E.
28 August 2026
Page 9
proposal. Please return one signed work authorization to Dr. Timothy Copeland's attention.
Please call the undersigned with questions you may have as you review this proposal.
Sincerely,
Timothy R. Copeland, Ph.D., P.E.tr-L)
Senior Engineer
Sarah Gustitus-Graham, Ph.D., P.E. (FL)
Project Engineer
Crig R. Browne, P.E.)
cipal Engineer
P2611570`JRC Master Plan Proposal
engineers I scientists I innovators
ATTACHMENT A
DETAILED BUDGET ESTIMATE
Table 1
BUDGET ESTIMATE
MASTER PLAN
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY LANDFILL
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
PHASE 1: GENERAL CONSULTING/MEETING SUPPORT/PROJECT MANAGEMENT
II
1 ITEM ( BASIS I RATE QUANTITY I ESTIMii ATED (i
ST
A. Professional Services
a. Senior Principal
Hr
$345.00
0
$0.00
b. Principal
Hr
$325.00
7
$2,275.00
c. Senior Professional
Hr
$300.00
47
$14,100.00
d. Project Professional
Hr
$268.00
33
$8,844.00
e. Professional
Hr
$239.00
33
$7,887.00
f. Senior Staff Professional
Hr
$210.00
0
$0.00
g. Staff Professional
Hr
$185.00
0
$0.00
Subtotal Professional Services
$33,106.00
B. Technical/Administrative Services
a. Site Mana er/Construction Mana er
Hr
$174.00
0
$0.00
b. Senior En ineerin Technician
Hr
$120.00
0
$0.00
c. En ineerin Technician
Hr
$100.00
0
$0.00
d. Senior Desi ner
Hr
$225.00
0
$0.00
e. Designer ner
Hr
$190.00
0
$0.00
f. Senior Drafter/Senior CADD O erator
Hr
$175.00
0
$0.00
g.Project Administrator
Hr
$104.00
7
$728.00
h. Clerical
Hr
$84.00
0
$0.00
Subtotal
Technical/Administrative
Services
$728.00
C. Indirect Ex penses
a. Subcontractor Services
Each
$0.00
1.12
50.00
Subcontractor Services
$0.00
D. Direct Ex enses
a. Lodging
Day
S150.00
0
S0.00
b. Per Diem
Day
$55.00
6
$330.00
c. Communications Fee
3% Labor
3%
$33,834
$1,015.02
d. CADD Com uter S stem
Hr
$15.00
0
$0.00
e. Vehicle Rental & Fuel
Day
$150.00
6
$900.00
f. 8"x11" Photoco ies
Each
$0.09
0
$0.00
q. CADD Drawin s
Each
$3.00
0
$0.00
Subtotal Reimbursables
$2,245.02
TOTAL ESTIMATED BUDGET: PHASE 1
$36.079.02
Table 2
BUDGET ESTIMATE
MASTER PLAN
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY LANDFILL
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
PHASE 2: LANDFILL DEVELOPMENT, SEQUENCING
AND DESIGN CAPACITY PLAN
ITEM
BASIS
RATE
QUANTITY
ESTIMATED
COST
A. Professional Services
a. Senior Principal
Hr
$345.00
0
$0.00
b. Principal
Hr
$325.00
32
$10,400.00
c. Senior Professional
Hr
$300.00
20
$6,000.00
d. Project Professional
Hr
$268.00
90
$24,120.00
e. Professional
Hr
$239.00
44
$10,516.00
f. Senior Staff Professional
Hr
$210.00
124
$26,040.00
g. Staff Professional
Hr
$185.00
0
$0.00
Subtotal Professional Services
$77,076.00
B. Technical/Administrative Services
a. Site Mana erlConstruction Mana er
Hr
$174.00
0
$0.00
b. Senior En ineerin Technician
Hr
$120.00
0
$0.00
c. En ineerin Technician
Hr
$100.00
0
$0.00
d. Senior Desi ner
Hr
$225.00
192
$43,200.00
e. Designer ner
Hr
$190.00
0
$0.00
f. Senior Drafter/Senior CADD O erator
Hr
$175.00
0
$0.00
g.Project Administrator
Hr
$104.00
6
$624.00
h. Clerical
Hr
$84.00
0
$0.00
Subtotal
Technical/Administrative
Services
$43,824.00
C. Indirect Ex enses
a. Subcontractor Services
Each
$0.00
1.12
50.00
Subcontractor Services
$0.00
D. Direct Ex enses
a. Lodging
Day
$150.00
0
$0.00
b. Per Diem
Day
$55.00
0
$0.00
c. Communications Fee
3% Labor
3%
$120,900
$3,627.00
d. CADD Com uter S stem
Hr
$15.00
192
$2,880.00
e. Vehicle Rental & Fuel
Day
$150.00
0
$0.00
f. 8"x11" Photoco ies
Each
$0.09
50
$4.50
g.CADD Drawin s
Each
$3.00
0
$0.00
Subtotal Reimbursables
$6.511.50
TOTAL ESTIMATED BUDGET : PHASE 2
$127.411.50
Table 3
BUDGET ESTIMATE
MASTER PLAN
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY LANDFILL
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
PHASE 3: SITE OPERATIONS REVIEW
ESTIMATED
ITEM
BASIS
RATE
QUANTITY
COST
A. Professional Services
a. Senior Principal
Hr
S345.00
2
$690.00
b. Principal
Hr
$325.00
10
$3,250.00
c. Senior Professional
Hr
$300.00
54
$16,200.00
d. Project Professional
Hr
$268.00
38
$10,184.00
e. Professional
Hr
$239.00
0
$0.00
f. Senior Staff Professional
Hr
$210.00
156
$32,760.00
g. Staff Professional
Hr
$185.00
0
$0.00
Subtotal Professional Services
$63,084.00
B. Technical/Administrative Services
a. Site Manager/Construction Manager
Hr
$174.00
0
$0.00
b. Senior Engineering Technician
Hr
$120.00
0
$0.00
c. Engineering Technician
Hr
$100.00
0
$0.00
d. Senior Designer
Hr
$225.00
0
$0.00
e. Designer
Hr
$190.00
0
$0.00
f. Senior Drafter/Senior CADD Operator
Hr
$175.00
0
$0.00
g. Project Administrator
Hr
$104.00
4
$416.00
h. Clerical
Hr
$84.00
0
$0.00
Subtotal
TechnicaI/Administrative
Services
$416.00
C. Indirect Expenses
a. Subcontractor Services
Each
S0 00-
1.12
$0.00
Subcontractor Services
$0.00
D. Direct Expenses
a. Lodging
Day
S150.00
6
5900.00
b. Per Diem
Day
$55.00
10
$550.00
c. Communications Fee
3% Labor
3%
$63,500
$1,905.00
d. CADD Computer System
Hr
$15.00
0
$0.00
e. Vehicle Rental & Fuel
Day
$150.00
5
$750.00
f. 8"x11" Photocopies
Each
$0.09
50
$4.50
g. CADD Drawings
Each
$3.00
0
$0.00
Subtotal Reimbursables
$4,109.50
TOTAL ESTIMATED BUDGET: PHASE 3
567.609.50
Table 4
BUDGET ESTIMATE
MASTER PLAN
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY LANDFILL
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
PHASE 4: CAPITAL RECOMMENDATIONS
II
II ITEM BASIS I RATE QUANTITY ESTIMATED (I
COST
A. Professional Services
a. Senior Principal
Hr
$345.00
0
$0.00
b. Principal
Hr
$325.00
8
$2.600.00
c. Senior Professional
Hr
$300.00
4
81.200.00
d. Project Professional
Hr
$268.00
20
$5.360.00
e. Professional
Hr
$239.00
0
80.00
f. Senior Staff Professional
Hr
$210.00
24
$5.040.00
g. Staff Professional
Hr
$185.00
0
80.00
Subtotal Professional Services
$14,200.00
B. Technical/Administrative Services
a. Site Manager Construction Manager
Hr
$174.00
0
$0.00
b. Senior En ineerin Technician
Hr
$120.00
0
$0.00
c. En ineerin Technician
Hr
$100.00
0
$0.00
d. Senior Desi ner
Hr
$225.00
0
$0.00
e. Designer ner
Hr
S190.00
0
$0.00
f. Senior Drafter/Senior CADD O erator
Hr
$175.00
0
$0.00
g.Project Administrator
Hr
$104.00
0
$0.00
h. Clerical
Hr
$84.00
0
$0.00
Subtotal Technical/Administrative Services
$0.00
C. Indirect Ex enses
a. Subcontractor Services
Each
50.00
1 12
$0.00
Subcontractor Services
$0.00
D. Direct Ex nses
a. Lod in
Day
$150.00
0
S0.00
b. Per Diem
Day
$55.00
0
S0.00
c. Communications Fee
34,E Labor
3%
$14,200
$426.00
d. CADD Computer S stem
Hr
$15.00
0
$0.00
e. Vehicle Rental & Fuel
Day
$150.00
0
$0.00
f. 8"x 11 " Photocopies
Each
$0.09
50
$4.50
CADD Drawin s
Each
$3.00
0
$0.00
Subtotal Reimbursables
$430.50
TOTAL ESTIMATED BUDGET: PHASE 4
$14,630.50