Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
8/12/1997
MINUMATTACHED BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS _ INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA A G E N D A TUESDAY, AUGUST 12,1997 9:00 A.M. - COUNTY COMMISSION CHAMBER County Administration Building 1840 25th Street, Vero Beach, Florida 32960 COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Carolyn K. Eggert, Chairman (District 2) John W. Tippin, Vice Chairman (District 4) Fran B. Adams (District 1) Caroline D. Ginn (District 5 Kenneth R. Macht (District 3) James E. Chandler, County Administrator Charles P. Vitunac, County Attorney Jeffirey K. Barton, Clerk to the Board 9:00 a.m. 1. CALL TO ORDER BACK P PAGES 2. INVOCATION None 3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE - Comm. John W. Tippin 4. ADDITIONS to the AGENDA/EMERGENCY ITEMS DELETED 14.13.1. ANNOUNCEMENT Aquaculture Use Zone Workshop 5. PROCLAMATION and PRESENTATIONS None 6. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Regular Meeting of July 22, 1997 7. CONSENT AGENDA A. Proclamation Designating Week of Sept. 17 thru Sept. 23 as Constitution Week in Ind. Riv. Co. 1 B. Approval of Warrants (memorandum dated July 31, 1997) 2-9 C. Onsite Management Group, Inc.'s Request for Final Plat Approval for Hammock Lakes Phase I Planned Development (memorandum dated July 31, 1997) 10-30 D. Request from Sylvia Peltier to Deed Back R -O -W Intersection of 78th Ave. and 129th Street (memorandum dated July 30, 1997) 31-35 E. Dock License Agreement - Country Club Pointe S/D (memorandum dated July 10, 1997) 36-39 WK U PAGE 218 9:05 A.M. 7. CONSENT AGENDA (cont'd.): 600K 1044' PAGE219 C PAGES F. Recently Acquired Properties - Tax Cancellations (memorandum dated July 28, 1997) 40-52 G. Fiber Optic Cable Contract - Final Payment (memorandum dated August 4, 1997) 53 H. I.R.C. Jail, Fire Alarm and Fire Sprinklers Repair (memorandum dated August 1, 1997) 54-61 I. Request Approval for Out -of -County Travel for County Comm. to Attend County Government Services Meeting, Orlando, Sept. 12 62-63 8. CONSTITUTIONAL OFFICERS and GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES None 9. PUBLIC ITEMS A. PUBLIC HEARINGS AN ORDINANCE OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE AND THE ACCOM- PANYING ZONING MAP FROM A-1 TO RM -8, FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF 90TH AVE. AND 26TH ST., AND DESCRIBED HEREIN, AND PROVIDING FOR EFFECTIVE DATE 64-85 2. AN ORDINANCE OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE AND THE ACCOM- PANYING ZONING MAP FROM CH TO CG, FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED IN THE 9400 BLOCK ON THE NORTH SIDE OF S.R. 60, WEST OF I-95, AND DESCRIBED HERE- IN, AND PROVIDING FOR EFFECTIVE DATE 86-98 3. St. Edwards School Inc.'s Request for Conceptual Special Exception Approval to Expand the Exist- ing St. Edwards Upper School Campus (memorandum dated July 28, 1997) 99-111 4. Solid Waste Disposal District Public Hearing: Ocean Spray/Hercules Property Exchange (memorandum dated August 5, 1997) 112-117 B. PUBLIC DISCUSSION ITEMS None C. PUBLIC NOTICE ITEMS None 10. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S MATTERS None 11. DEPARTMENTAL MATTERS A. Community Development None � 11. DEPARTMENTAL'�4'6S (cont'd): ,KUP ES B. Emergency Services - - 1. Approval of the Ind. Riv. Co. Compre- hensive Emergency Management Plan (memorandum dated August 5, 1997) 118-121 2. Allocation of Existing Grant Funds from the FY 96/97 Emergency Management Preparedness and Assistance (EWA) Agreement to Purchase Capital Equip. 163-165 (memorandum dated August 5, 1997) 122-123 C. General Services Gov't. Access Channel (memorandum dated July 24, 1997) 124-136 D. Leisure Services 166-178 None E. Office of Management and Budget None F. Personnel None G. Public Works 1. 16th Street Roadway Drainage Replacement - Rockridge S/D - I.R.C. Public Works Dept. Joint Project Agreement w/Fla. Dept. of Transportation (memorandum dated July 30, 1997) 137-162 2. 1st St. SW R -O -W Acquisition - 58th Ave. Improvements/Oslo Rd. to 26th St., Parcel No. 130, John S. & Karen A. Schwartz (memorandum dated August 5, 1997) 163-165 H. Utilities 1. West Meadows S/D Petition Water Service (45th Ave. & 45th CM North of 4th St.) Resolutions I and H (memorandum dated July 25, 1997) 166-178 2. Developer's Agreement to Oversize Lift Station at Grove Place Medical Center (memorandum dated August 1, 1997) 179-185 3. Rate Study (memorandum dated August 5, 1997) 186-223 12. COUNTY ATTORNEY None 13. COMMISSIONERS ITEMS A. Chairman Carolyn K. Eggert 6®0K 102 PAGE 220 bOQK � , PAGE 2 . BACKUP 13. COMSSIONERS ITEMS (cont'd.l: AGE MIS B. Vice Chairman John W. Tippin C. Commissioner Fran B. Adams D. Commissioner Caroline D. Ginn E. Commissioner Kenneth R. Macht 14. SPECIAL DISTRICTSBOARDS A. Emergency Services District None B. Solid Waste Disposal District 1. Unused Waste Tire Grant Funds (memorandum dated June 17, 1997) 224-226 2. Ocean Spray / Hercules Property Exchange - See Public Hearing Item 9A4 C. Environmental Control Board None 15. ADJOURNMENT Anyone who may wish to appeal any decision which may be made at this meeting will need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made which includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal will be based. Anyone who needs a special accommodation for this meeting may contact the county's Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) coordinator at 567-8000 x408 at least 48 hours in advance 3f meeting. Meeting broadcast live on TCI Cable Channel 13 - rebroadcast S: 00 p.m. Thursday through S: 00 p. m. Friday Falcon Cable Channel 35 - rebroadcast Friday evening INDEX TO MINUTES REGULAR MEETING OF BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS AUGUST 12, 1997 1. CALL TO ORDER....................................................................................................................................1 2. INVOCATION...........................................................................................................................................1 3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE....................................................................................................................1 4. ADDITIONS - EMERGENCY ITEMS - DELETIONS - ANNOUNCEMENTS......................................1 5. PROCLAMATIONS AND PRESENTATIONS........................................................................................ 3 6. APPROVAL OF MINUTES...................................................................................................................... 3 7. CONSENT AGENDA................................................................................................................................. 3 7.A. PROCLAMATION- CONSTITUTION WEEK -WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 17-23, 1997 ........................................... 3 7.B. APPROVAL OF WARRANTS........................................................................................................................ 4 7.C. HAMMOCK LAKES PHASE I PLANNED DEVELOPMENT - FINAL PLAT APPROVAL - ONSITE MANAGEMENT GROUP............................................................................................................................................................ 11 7.D. DEED BACK RIGHT-OF-WAY INTERSECTION OF 78"` AVENUE AND 129'x` STREET TO SYLVIA PELTIER (LAURA LATHERO-GAY).................................................................................................................................. 13 7.E. COUNTRY CLUB POINTE S/D- DOCK LICENSE AGREEMENT - VANKLEECK............................................... 14 7.F. RECENTLY ACQUIRED PROPERTIES - TAX CANCELLATIONS.................................................................... 16 7.G. FIBER OPTIC CABLE CONTRACT - FINAL PAYMENT - PRECISION CONTRACTING SERVICES, INC. (PCS) ... 29 7.11. INDIAN RIVER COUNTY JAIL- FIRE ALARM AND FIRE SPRINKLERS REPAIR .............................................. 29 7.I. OUT -OF -COUNTY TRAVEL APPROVED FOR COMMISSIONERS TO ATTEND COUNTY GOVERNMENT SERVICES MEETING, ORLANDO, SEPTEMBER 12............................................................................................................... 32 8. CONSTITUTIONAL OFFICERS AND GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES ........................................... 34 9.A. PUBLIC HEARING- ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE AND MAP FROM A-1 TO RM -8 - S.W. CORNER OF 90'*H AVENUE AND 261" STREET (17.5+/- ACRES) - REQUESTED BYJACQUELYN S. REED............................................................................................................................... 34 9.A.2. PUBLIC HEARING -AMENDING ZONING ORDINANCE AND MAP FROM CH TO CG -9400 BLOCK ON NORTH ,SIDE OF SR -60, WEST OF I-95 (0.82+/- ACRES) ....................................................... 49 9.A.3. PUBLIC HEARING - REQUEST FOR CONCEPTUAL SPECIAL EXCEPTION APPROVAL TO EXPAND THE EXISTING ST. EDWARDS UPPER SCHOOL CAMPUS ..................................................... 57 9.A.4. PUBLIC HEARING -SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL DISTRICT- OCEAN SPRAY/HERCULES PROPERTY EXCHANGE................................................................................................................................ 68 August 12, 1997 B00K U PAGE 222 600, N� PAGE 22i 11.B.1. COMPREHENSIVE EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT PLAN APPROVAL .............................. 68 11.B.2. EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT PREPAREDNESS AND ASSISTANCE FY 1996/97 GRANT FUNDS ALLOCATED FOR PURCHASE OF CAPITAL EQUIPMENT....................................................... 70 11.C. GOVERNMENT ACCESS CHANNEL............................................................................................. 72 11.G.1. 16'$ STREET ROADWAY DRAINAGE REPLACEMENT — ROCKRIDGE S/D — JOINT PROJECT AGREEMENT WITH FDOT — DAMES AND MOORE, INC ...................................................... 78 11.G.2. 1sT STREET S.W. RIGHT-OF-WAY ACQUISITION — 58TH AVENUE IMPROVEMENTS/OSLO ROAD TO 26TH STREET — PARCEL NO. 130 — SCHWARTZ....................................................................... 79 11.11.1. WEST MEADOWS SUBDIVISION — PETITION WATER SERVICE — RESOLUTIONS I AND H (45m AVENUE & 45m COURT, NORTH OF 4TH STREET)...................................................................... 80 i1.H.2. GROVE PLACE MEDICAL CENTER— DEVELOPER'S AGREEMENT TO OVERSIZE LIFT STATION AND FORCE MAIN — OAK POINT DEVELOPMENT GROUP, INC ......................................... 89 11.11.3. UTILITIES RATE STUDY................................................................................................................. 90 DOCUMENTS TO BE MADE PART OF THE RECORD............................................................................... 92 RETIREMENT AWARD- CLAUDE W. HODGSON................................................................................................. 92 SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL DISTRICT.......................................................................................................... 93 2 August 12, 1997 m August 12, 1997 The Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida, met in Regular Session at the County Commission Chambers, 1840 25th Street, Vero Beach, Florida, on Tuesday, August 12, 1997, at 9:00 a.m. Present were Carolyn K. Eggert, Chairman; John W. Tippin, Vice Chairman: Fran B. Adams; Kenneth R. Macht, and Caroline D. Ginn. Also present were James E. Chandler, County Administrator; Charles P. Vitunac, County Attorney; and Patricia Ridgely, Deputy Clerk. 1. CALL TO ORDER The Chairman called the meeting to order at 9:00 a.m. 2. INVOCATION Commissioner Tippin delivered the invocation. 3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Commissioner Tippin led the Pledge to the Flag. 4. ADDITIONS - EMERGENCY ITEMS - DELETIONS - ANNOUNCEMENTS County Administrator James E. Chandler advised that item 14.B.1. Solid Waste Disposal District Agenda, Unused Waste Tire Grant Funds, is to be deleted. It will be brought back. ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED BY Commissioner Ginn, the Board unanimously approved deletion of item 14.B.1. 1 690K 2 FAGGE 2� August 12, 1997 Chairman Eggert announced that a public workshop will be held in the Indian River County Commission Chambers August 14, 1997, 7:00 — 9:00 p.m. The workshop will be presented by the Florida Department of Environmental Protection, Bureau of Marine Resource Regulation and Development. The purpose of the workshop is to discuss the proposed establishment of an Aquaculture Use Zone, north and east of Pelican Island. Also involved is the U.S. Department of Interior, Pelican Island National Wildlife Refuge, and the Board of County Commissioners. She advised that all are welcome to come and give their opinions about it. This workshop has been advertised in the legal advertisements, but the announcement was being made for those who might not have seen the ads. The agenda for this workshop is as follows: Public Workshop Agenda Aquaculture Use Zone in North Indian River County DATE: August 13, 1997 LOCATION: County Commission Room Indian River Board Of County Commissioners 1840 25'h Street, Vero Beach, Florida TIME: 7:00 - 9:00 pm AGENDA Welcome and Introduction Carolyn K. Eggert, Moderator Chairman, Board of County Commissioners Department of Environmental Protection Perspective Mark Berrigan, Aquaculture Coordinator Division of Marine Resources Pelican Island National Wildlife Refuge Perspective Dorn Whitmore, Project Coordinator U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Shellfish Aquaculture: The Cedar Key Model David Vaughan, Director of Aquaculture Harbor Branch Oceanographic Institution Aquaculture Training Programs Mike Ednoff, Aquaculture Division Harbor Branch Oceanographic Institution Public Comment Closing Remarks 2 August 12, 1997 5. PROCLAMATIONS AND PRESENTATIONS None. 6. APPROVAL OF MINUTES The Chairman asked if there were any correction or additions to the Minutes of the Regular Meeting of July 22, 1997. There were none. ON MOTION by Commissioner Ginn, SECONDED BY Commissioner Adams, the Board unanimously approved the Minutes of the Regular Meeting of July 22, 1997, as written and distributed. 7. CONSENT AGENDA 7.A. Proclamation — Constitution Week — Week of September 17-23,1997 PROCLAMATION WHEREAS, Our Founding Fathers, in order to secure the blessings of liberty for themselves and their posterity, did ordain and establish a Constitution for the United States of America; and WHEREAS, it is of the greatest import that all citizens fully understand the provisions and principles contained in the Constitution in order to support, preserve and defend it against encroachment; and WHEREAS, the two hundred tenth anniversary of the signing of the Constitution provides a historic opportunity for all Americans to learn about and recall achievements of our Founders, and to reflect on the rights and privileges of citizenship, as well as its attendant responsibilities; and WHEREAS, the independence guaranteed to the American people by the Constitution should be celebrated by appropriate ceremonies and activities during Constitution Week: 3 August 12,1997®OK U FAGE:;� Ur'4E �'' NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT PROCLAMM BY THE INDIAN RIVER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY CO24MSSIONERS that the week of September 17 through September 23, 1997 be designated as CONSTITUTION WEEK in Indian River County, and the Board urges all citizens to pay special attention during that week to our Federal Constitution and the advantage of American Citizenship. Adopted this 19 day of August, 1997 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA / - --- 4• Carolyn R. Eggert, hairman 7.B. Approval of Warrants The Board reviewed a Memorandum dated July 31, 1997: TO: HONORABLE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS DATE: JULY 31, 1997 SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF WARRANTS FROM: EDWIN M. FRY, JR., FINANCE DIRECTOR In compliance with Chapter 136.06, Florida Statutes, all warrants issued by the Board of County Commissioners are to be recorded in the Board minutes. Approval is requested for the attached list of warrants, issued by the Clerk to the Board, for the time period of July 25 to July 31, 1997. 4 August 12,1997 7_ J ON MOTION by Commissioner Ginn, SECONDED BY Commissioner Adams, the Board unanimously approved the list of warrants issued by the Clerk to the Board for the period July 25-31, 1997, as requested. CHECK NAME CHECK CHECK NUMBER DATE AMOUNT 0018647 C A SISU CONTRACTING,INC 7/25/97 7,554.80 0018648 FLORIDA COMBINED LIFE 7/25/97 1,650.08 0018649 BILKEN GROUP 7/25/97 172.00 0018650 EDGEWOOD PLACE (305-113) 7/25/97 215.00 0018651 GIFFORD GROVES, LTD 7/25/97 283.00 0018652 JAMES A DOOLITTLE & ASSOCIATES 7/25/97 413.00 0018653 FT PIERCE, CITY OF 7/29/97 123.00 0018654 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY BOARD OF 7/30/97 1,160.00 0018655 TEAMSTERS LOCAL UNION NO 769 7/30/97 3,595.69 0218514 COOKLEY, NATHANIEL A 2/27/97 .00 0219239 SHAFFFER, RAE ANN 3/13/97 .00 0221604 JORDAN, WILLIAM 4/24/97 .00 0222043 NELSEN, MICHAEL, 4/30/97 .00 0222061 HARDING, CHRISTOPHER 4/30/97 .00 0222832 MC DOWELL, AMY 5/15/97 .00 0222843 BARFIELD, KRISTINA 5/15/97 .00 0223571 TEET'E'RS, JOHN K 5/29/97 .00 0225419 SWANA FLORIDA SUNSHINE 7/03/97 .00 0225619 MCKEEEL, HELEN 7/10/97 .00 0225893 J A A F CONFERENCE 7/17/97 .00 0226098 BOGUS, VICTOR 7/17/97 .00 0226181 DAVES SPORTING GOODS 7/24/97 .00 0226397 SUNNYLAND CLEARING 7/24/97 .00 0226728 ACTION TRANSMISSION AND 7/31/97 582.14 0226729 ADVANCED GARAGE DOORS, INC 7/31/97 140.00 0226730 AERO PRODUCTS CORPORATION 7/31/97 716.20 0226731 AHR, C JONATHAN PHD 7/31/97 1,000.00 0226732 AIRBORNE EXPRESS 7/31/97 11.99 0226733 ALPHA ACE HARDWARE 7/31/97 15.37 0226734 AMATEUR ELECTRONICS SUPPLY,INC 7/31/97 70.85 0226735 A T & T 7/31/97 25.07 0226736 ALL FLORIDA BEVERAGE & OFFICE 7/31/97 124.40 0226737 ALL RITE WATER CONDITIONING 7/31/97 262.15 0226738 ADDISON OIL CO 7/31/97 619.58 0226739 A-1 CONSTRUCTION CO, INC 7/31/97 13,355.32 0226740 AMERICAN LIBRARY ASSOCIATION 7/31/97 62.00 0226741 ARCHTECTS & DESIGNERS 7/31/97 43.19 0226742 ALTERATIONS 7/31/97 12.50 0226743 AYCOCK FUNERAL HOMES 7/31/97 300.00 0226744 ANASTASIO, JOHN J ESQUIRE 7/31/97 50.00 0226745 BAKER BROTHERS, INC 7/31/97 442.49 0226746 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS 7/31/97 3,069.03 0226747 BENSONS LOCK SERVICE 7/31/97 122.48 0226748 BROOKS, RONALD R 7/31/97 35.00 0226749 BELLSOUTH MOBILITY 7/31/97 168.85 0226750 BARTON, JEFFREY K- CLERK 7/31/97 169,574.50 0226751 BARTON, JEFFREY K -CLERK 7/31/97 1,665.00 0226752 BRODART CO 7/31/97 70.75 5 GGWKWPAGE,; August 12, 1997 800K 102 CHECK NAME CHECK CHECK NUMBER DATE AMOUNT 0226753 BEN RAILROAD TIES 7/31/97 900.00 0226754 BILLING SERVICE, INC 7/31/97 145.22 0226755 BRINSON, ROBERT A & S JEAN 7/31/97 21.32 0226756 BAKER ST INVESTIGATIONS INC 7/31/97 300.00 0226757 BELLSOUTH 7/31/97 1,215.49 0226758 BENNETT MARINE VIDEO INC 7/31/97 51.90 0226759 BELLSOUTH PUBLIC COMMUNICATION 7/31/97 293.37 0226760 BOISE CASCADE OFFICE PRODUCTS 7/31/97 220.77 0226761 BEAZER HOMES 7/31/97 1,000.00 0226762 BAKER & TAYLOR INC 7/31/97 962.86 0226763 BACK COUNTRY INC 7/31/97 500.00 0226764 BRONSTEIN, RICHARD D 7/31/97 55.68 0226765 BRASFIELD & GORRIE 7/31/97 534.60 0226766 BROWN & CALDWELL 7/31/97 217.57 0226767 CARTER ASSOCIATES, INC 7/31/97 2,151.08 0226768 FALCON POWER LIMITED 7/31/97 4.24 0226769 CHANDLER EQUIPMENT CO, INC 7/31/97 124.24 0226770 CITRUS MOTEL 7/31/97 109.00 0226771 CLASSIC AWARDS 7/31/97 29.50 0226772 COLD AIR DISTRIBUTORS 7/31/97 153.85 0226773 COLKITT SHEET METAL & AIR, INC 7/31/97 97.50 0226774 COLLINS, WILLIAM G II 7/31/97 409.00 0226775 COMMUNICATIONS INT'L INC 7/31/97 1,021.68 0226776 CORBIN, SHIRLEY E 7/31/97 119.00 0226777 CHEMSEARCH 7/31/97 55.72 0226778 CLARK WATER CONDITIONING 7/31/97 191.05_ 0226779 COASTAL FUELS MARKETING, INC 7/31/97 14,427.16 0226780 CLINIC PHARMACY 7/31/97 682.18 0226781 CUSTOM CARRIAGES, INC 7/31/97 109.76 0226782 CHIVERS NORTH AMERICA 7/31/97 44.64 0226783 CHILBERG CONSTRUCTION CO INC 7/31/97 13,446.00 0226784 CLEANNET USA 7/31/97 19,691.94 0226785 COMMERCIAL SERVICE COMPANY 7/31/97 305.50 0226786 CROSSROADS ANIMAL HOSPITAL 7/31/97 15.00 0226787 COMPAQ G.E.M. 7/31/97 170.00 0226788 CANTERBURY 7/31/97 22.42 0226789 CORPORATION OF THE PRESIDENT 7/31/97 133.25 0226790 CENTER FOR EMOTIONAL AND 7/31/97 171.00 0226791 CELLMARK DIAGNOSTICS INC 7/31/97 1,879.00 0226792 COLUMBIA HOUSE 7/31/97 30.46 0226793 CUNNINGHAM, KATHY 7/31/97 6.00 0226794 COMMUNITY SAVINGS OF FLORIDA 7/31/97 500.00 0226795 DEBLOIS, ROLAND M. 7/31/97 81.55 0226796 DEMCO INC 7/31/97 334.45 0226797 DICKERSON FLORIDA, INC 7/31/97 576.19 0226798 DICKEY SCALES, INC 7/31/97 400.00 0226799 DICTAPHONE CORPORATION 7/31/97 300.00 0226800 DOCTOR'S CLINIC 7/31/97 2,390.58 0226801 DIXON, PEGGY C 7/31/97 315.00 0226802 DUVAL FORD 7/31/97 19,393.00 0226803 DISCOUNT AUTO PARTS 7/31/97 10.44 0226804 DAVIDSON TITLES, INC 7/31/97 18.95 0226805 DRUM, TERRY 7/31/97 73.76 0226806 DELRAY STAKES, INC 7/31/97 330.00 0226807 DADE PAPER COMPANY 7/31/97 326.82 0226808 DEPARTMENT OF INSURANCE -BUREAU 7/31/97 240.00 0226809 D & L ASSOCIATES INC 7/31/97 549.02 0226810 DAVID M GRIFFITH & ASSOCIATES 7/31/97 4,033.13 0226811 DE BLOIS, SUE 7/31/97 60.00 0226812 DINGS CO 7/31/97 1,583.00 0226813 EVANS, FLOYD 7/31/97 75.00 0226814 EMERGENCY MEDICINE ASSOCIATES 7/31/97 33.00 0226815 ELPEX, INC 7/31/97 127.50 0 August 12, 1997 CHECK NAME CHECK CHECK NUMBER DATE AMOUNT 0226816 ELLIOTT BUSINESS MACHINES, INC 7/31/97 81.75 0226817 ERICSSON, INC 7/31/97 37.50 0226818 EXECUTIVE SERVICES 7/31/97 142.50 0226819 EDWARDS, THOMAS L P.A. 7/31/97 500.00 0226820 FLORIDA COCA-COLA BOTTLING CO 7/31/97 215.60 0226821 F P & L 7/31/97 5,517.42 0226822 FOURTH DISTRICT COURT OF 7/31/97 250.00 0226823 FLORIDA RECREATION & PARK 7/31/97 70.00 0226824 FLOWERS BAKING COMPANY OF 7/31/97 17.84 0226825 FLINN, SHEILA I 7/31/97 217.00 0226826 FLORIDA FUNDING PUBLICATIONS 7/31/97 74.00 0226827 FATHER & SON APPLIANCES 7/31/97 8.41 0226828 FENNIMORE, CHARLES 7/31/97 72.00 0226829 FALZONE, CHRISTOPHER 7/31/97 42.75 0226830 FLORIDA LAW WEEKLY 7/31/97 251.00 0226831 FIORILLO, JOHN 7/31/97 15.00 0226832 GENE'S AUTO GLASS 7/31/97 230.00 0226833 GEORGE W FOWLER CO 7/31/97 45.80 0226834 GLIDDEN COMPANY, THE 7/31/97 199.90 0226835 GOODKNIGHT LAWN EQUIPMENT, INC 7/31/97 12.92 0226836 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC 7/31/97 279.00 0226837 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO, INC 7/31/97 35.50 0226838 GRAINGER (W W GRAINER) 7/31/97 457.30 0226839 GREENE, ROBERT E 7/31/97 1,736.98 0226840 GNB TECHNOLOGIES 7/31/97 69.60 0226841 GINN, CAROLINE D 7/31/97 36.10 0226842 GUTTRIDGE, BOBBY D 7/31/97 64.38 0226843 GANGER, CHARISE 7/31/97 33.25 0226844 HARRIS SANITATION, INC 7/31/97 56.62 0226845 HARRISON UNIFORMS 7/31/97 2,763.97 0226846 HI -TECH SERVICING TECH'NS 7/31/97 390.00 0226847 HACH SUPPLY 7/31/97 166.90 0226848 HEALTHSOUTH TREASURE COAST 7/31/97 126.00 0226849 HICKORY ASSOCIATES 7/31/97 96.00 0226850 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY 7/31/97 58,488.75 0226851 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY 7/31/97 25.00 0226852 INDIAN RIVER BATTERY 7/31/97 462.35 0226853 INDIAN RIVER BLUE PR=, INC 7/31/97 334.99 0226854 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY UTILITY 7/31/97 1,631.97 0226855 INGRAM 7/31/97 1,955.83 0226856 INDIAN RIVER MEMORIAL HOSPITAL 7/31/97 1,932.90 0226857 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY SCHOOL 7/31/97 950.00 0226858 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY 7/31/97 35.65 0226859 INSURANCE SERVICING & 7/31/97 2,835.00 0226860 IBM CORP-DVU 7/31/97 46.00 0226861 INDIAN RIVER CONSTRUCTION AND 7/31/97 500.00 0226862 INDIAN RIVER HAND 7/31/97 78.00 0226863 JACKSON ELECTRONICS 7/31/97 121.80 0226864 JORGENSEN, PETER ESQ 7/31/97 662.50 0226865 JEMS, JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY 7/31/97 24.97 0226866 JP COMPUTERS, INC 7/31/97 95.00 0226867 JANITORIAL DEPOT OF AMERICA 7/31/97 1,803.65 0226868 JONES CHEMICALS, INC 7/31/97 6,181.95 0226869 KIMLEY-HORN & ASSOCIATES, INC 7/31/97 1,351.51 0226870 KAUFFMANN, ALAN 7/31/97 84.00 0226871 KLINK, RICHARD 7/31/97 1,012.00 0226872 LUCAS WATERPROOFING CO, INC 7/31/97 2,375.00 0226873 LOWE'S HOME CENTERS, INC 7/31/97 101.17 0226874 L B SMITH, INC 7/31/97 624.02 0226875 LIGHT SOURCE BUSINESS SYSTEMS 7/31/97 162.50 0226876 LFI VERO BEACH, INC 7/31/97 1,825.32 0226877 LESCO; INC 7/31/97 914.85 0226878 LAPSCO INC 7/31/97 111.25 0226879 LLOYD, JOHN RALPH 7/31/97 60.00 7 EiO�K02'd PAGE � 0 August 12, 1997 BOOK N20 PAGE 21311. CHECK NAME CHECK CHECK NUMBER DATE AMOUNT 0226880 MACMILLAN OIL COMPANY 7/31/97 565.70 0226881 MAXWELL PLUMBING, INC 7/31/97 468.41 0226882 INDIAN RIVER COMMUNITY COLLEGE 7/31/97 15,131.00 0226883 MID COAST TIRE SERVICE, INC 7/31/97 220.40 0226884 MORGAN, DAVID C 7/31/97 390.44 0226885 MAIN PAINT & SUPPLY 7/31/97 22.90 0226886 MIAMI ELEAVTOR COMPANY 7/31/97 1,958.00 0226887 MITRON SYSTEMS CORPORATION 7/31/97 7,548.00 0226888 MEDICAL RECORD SERVICES, INC 7/31/97 40.07 0226889 MICRO -SCILLA 7/31/97 60.00 0226890 MIDWEST TAPE EXCHANGE 7/31/97 9.95 __• 0226891 MR BOB PORTABLE TOILET 7/31/97 76.12 0226892 MICROAGE 7/31/97 125.00 0226893 MRI -NET, INC 7/31/97 450.00 0226894 MAIN STREET HARDWARE, INC 7/31/97 38.47 0226895 MEDCHECK 7/31/97 125.51 0226896 MEDICAL EXAMINERS EDUCATIONAL 7/31/97 500.00 0226897 MILLS, W G 7/31/97 2,500.00 0226898 NOLTE, DAVID C 7/31/97 159,607.25 0226899 NICOSIA, ROGER J DO 7/31/97 1,500.00 0226900 NEW HORIZONS OF THE TREASURE 7/31/97 32,970.97 0226901 NICK VINE HALL 7/31/97 268.50 0226902 NATIONAL PROPANE CORP 7/31/97 54.04 0226903 NATURAL SCIENCE RESEARCH 7/31/97 4.74 0226904 OFFICE PRODUCTS & SERVICE 7/31/97 794.01 0226905 OFFICE DEPOT, INC 7/31/97 2,982.99 0226906 PIFER, INC 7/31/97 156.14 0226907 PITNEY BOWES, INC 7/31/97 225.00 0226908 POSTMASTER 7/31/97 200.00 0226909 PUBLIX SUPERMARKET 7/31/97 49.88 0226910 PUBLIX 7/31/97 20.00 0226911 POLK 7/31/97 146.00 0226912 PRESS JOURNAL 7/31/97 61.05 0226913 PROFESSIONAL COMPUTER SERVICES 7/31/97 145.00 0226914 PAGE ONE COURT REPORTING 7/31/97 25.00 0226915 PRO SPORTS & RECREATION 7/31/97 140.00 0226916 RADIO SHACK ACCT RECEIVABLE 7/31/97 545.23 0226917 RELIABLE WELL DRILLING 7/31/97 2,000.00 0226918 RUSSELL CONCRETE, INC 7/31/97 2,083.32 0226919 ROBERTS & REYNOLDS PA 7/31/97 3,904.58 0226920 REDSTONE, MICHAEL 7/31/97 141.45 0226921 R & G SOD FARMS 7/31/97 135.00 0226922 RUBBER STAMP EXPRESS 7/31/97 3.78 0226923 RAWLEY, LINZEY 7/31/97 23.75 0226924 SCOTTY'S, INC 7/31/97 209.40 0226925 SCOTTY'S, INC 7/31/97 86.79 0226926 SEARS COMMERCIAL CREDIT 7/31/97 805.04 0226927 SEBASTIAN, CITY OF 7/31/97 150.00 0226928 SEXUAL ASSAULT ASSISTANCE 7/31/97 4,087.75 0226929 SIRS, INC 7/31/97 250.00 0226930 SOUTHERN EAGLE DISTRIBUTING, 7/31/97 273.40 0226931 SOUTHERN ELECTRIC SUPPLY 7/31/97 623.63 0226932 SPENCER PEST CONTROL 7/31/97 85.00 0226933 ST LUCIE BATTERY & TIRE, INC 7/31/97 49.95 0226934 STATE OF FLORIDA 7/31/97 12,928.25 0226935 SUN COAST CLEANING SUPPLIES, 7/31/97 41.90 0226936 SUNSHINE PHYSICAL THERAPY 7/31/97 236.00 0226937 SERVICE REFRIGERATION CO, INC 7/31/97 87.00 0226938 SIMON & SCHUSTER CONSUMER 7/31/97 101.80 0226939 SOUTHERN SEWER EQUIPMENT SALES 7/31/97 429.36 0226940 SEXTON, HILDY 7/31/97 80.00 0226941 SUN BELT MEDICAL SUPPLY, INC 7/31/97 1,027.60 0226942 SAWMILL RIDGE TRUCKING CO 7/31/97 26,317.65 0226943 SELIG CHEMICAL IND 7/31/97 269.50 N August 12, 1997 CHECK NAME CHECK CHECK NUMBER DATE AMOUNT 0226944 SALEM PRESS, INC 7/31/97 594.00 0226945 STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT 7/31/97 610.00 0226946 SOLINET 7/31/97 485.58 0226947 SUPERIOR PRINTING 7/31/97 946.00 0226948 SYSCO FOOD SERVICE 7/31/97 225.46 0226949 STARCK, DONNA 7/31/97 12.38 0226950 STEVENS PRINTING 7/31/97 2,994.75 0226951 SPRINKLE CONSULTING ENGINEERS, 7/31/97 14,920.87 0226952 SEBASTIAN EMERGENCY PHYSICIANS 7/31/97 41.00 0226953 STATE OF FLORIDA CRIMES 7/31/97 90.00 0226954 SEBASTIAN RIVER AREA CHAMBER 7/31/97 1,520.00 0226955 SOU SEC SYS OF FT PIERCE INC 7/31/97 68.00 0226956 SOUTHERN SECURITY SYSTEMS OF 7/31/97 1,020.00 0226957 STAGE & SCREEN 7/31/97 23.28 0226958 SCIMIMI, JOY A 7/31/97 50.00 0226959 SALTZ, BEN 7/31/97 500.00 0226960 STAMM MANUFACTURING 7/31/97 490.80 0226961 STAPLES OFFICE SUPPLY 7/31/97 29.99 0226962 TEXACO REFINING AND 7/31/97 579.83 0226963 TREASURE COAST SALT 7/31/97 264.60 0226964 TECHNOLOGY PARTNERS 7/31/97 80.00 0226965 THOMPSON PUBLISHING GROUP, INC 7/31/97 248.00 0226966 TRUGREEN CHEMLAWN 7/31/97 703.00 0226967 TRAVEL HUB 7/31/97 184.00 0226968 TRANSPORTATION CONSULTING 7/31/97 5,258.70 0226969 TIFTON GOLF SERVICES INC 7/31/97 63,504.00 0226970 TOMPKINS, RALPH J 7/31/97 14.95 0226971 'THERAPEUTIC MASSAGE BY DONNA & 7/31/97 56.75 0226972 TRANSCORE, INC 7/31/97 6,470.10 0226973 U S FILTER DISTRIBUTION,INC 7/31/97 4,491.44 0226974 VERO BEACH, CITY OF 7/31/97 87.57 0226975 VERO BEACH, CITY OF 7/31/97 9,752.73 0226976 VERO BEACH, CITY OF 7/31/97 9,175.00 0226977 VERO BEACH, CITY OF 7/31/97 56,666.67 0226978 VERO LAWNMOWER CE1V'TER, INC 7/31/97 151.85 0226979 VERO RADIATOR WORKS 7/31/97 24.00 0226980 VERO STARTER & GENERATOR 7/31/97 90.00 0226981 VERO BEACH, CITY OF 7/31/97 1,586.64 0226982 VERO BEACH POLICE DEPARTMENT 7/31/97 121.07 0226983 VERO BEARING & BOLT 7/31/97 237.70 0226984 VERO BEACH POWERTRAIN 7/31/97 316.25 0226985 VAN OS, ERIC 7/31/97 225.63 0226986 WEST PUBLISHING PAYMENT CTR 7/31/97 399.94 0226987 WINN DIXIE STORES, INC 7/31/97 661.77 0226988 WILLHOFF, PATSY 7/31/97 130.00 0226989 WHARTON-SMITH, INC 7/31/97 668,175.70 0226990 WABASSO GOLF 7/31/97 300.00 0226991 WOLFE, CARL 7/31/97 6.00 0226992 WHITESIDE PARTS & SERVICE INC 7/31/97 82.50 0226993 WOLFE, MEGAN 7/31/97 33.25 0226994 WEST PUBLISHING CORPORATION 7/31/97 139.75 0226995 WILDERNESS GRAPHICS, INC 7/31/97 7,645.00 0226996 WOLFE, ERIN 7/31/97 33.25 0226997 WEAVER, WILLIAM, PH D 7/31/97 262.50 0226998 WILLIAMS SOUND CORPORATION 7/31/97 51.50 0226999 WILLARD, DORIS 7/31/97 500.00 0227000 XEROX CORPORATION 7/31/97 316.70 0227001 ZEE MEDICAL SERVICES 7/31/97 141.71 0227002 WHITE, WAYNE J. 7/31/97 883.94 0227003 SISSON, CHARLES A 7/31/97 108.48 0227004 RYAN, NANCY J 7/31/97 52.60 Z August 12, 1997 BOOK 02 PAGE x`31.,, P� (�pK U PAGE �X33 iECK NAME CHECK CHECK mmz DATE AMOUNT 227005 RICHARDS, SARAH F 7/31/97 105.08 ?27006 HORNE, THOMAS H 7/31/97 105.02 227007 RUSSELL, DR JOHN 7/31/97 112.62 227008 REILLY, DAVID H 7/31/97 100.00 ?27009 HICKEY, MARTIN 7/31/97 40.00 227010 SCARMUZZI, JOSEPH A 7/31/97 120.34 227011 TUETKEN, LISA E 7/31/97 105.08 227012 POLICARE, MICHAEL 7/31/97 52.60 327013 BEDORE, GEORGE 7/31/97 109.58 227014 CALLAHAN, ELIZABETH 7/31/97 73.32 227015 DUFFY, JODI ANN 7/31/97 109.42 227016 DUFFEY, JOHN 7/31/97 105.04 227017 COMEAU, JOHN F SR 7/31/97 105.84 227018 LEWIS, MARTHA 7/31/97 3.25 227019 PALUMBO, LOUIS & JANET 7/31/97 20.11 227020 RODNEY, JOE 7/31/97 70.31 227021 CORNERSTONE SELECT HOMES INC 7/31/97 55.48 227022 MITCHELL, PAUL K 7/31/97 48.35 227023 BELMONT HOMES 7/31/97 42.53 227024 JETT, JAMES A & ELLA MAE 7/31/97 33.17 227025 BEAZER HOMES FLORIDA INC 7/31/97 64.35 227026 SHEETS, MICHAEL 7/31/97 39.19 ?27027 CARRASCO, KIMBERLY 7/31/97 10.43 227028 SIMES, CARROLL 7/31/97 58.95 127029 BIERY, CHARLES E 7/31/97 31.34 227030 OUETLET E, RUSSELL 7/31/97 25.10 227031 REAGAN, WILLIE C 7/31/97 72.17 327032 GRAND HARBOR 7/31/97 130.07 327033 MIXELL, LONNIE 7/31/97 11.69 227034 ROBINSON, CAMDEN 7/31/97 20.98 227035 VETERANS ADMINISTRATION 7/31/97 40.08 227036 BARKETT, LAWRENCE & REBECCA 7/31/97 40.73 227037 SMITH, ERNESTINE H 7/31/97 28.20 227038 COLONTRELLE, JOHN 7/31/97 90.00 227039 GRALIN, STEPHANIE LYNN 7/31/97 45.19 227040 JOHNSTON, GLENN W 7/31/97 27.65 327041 PEROCIER, JOSEPH 7/31/97 45.24 227042 HENSLEY, LAURIE 7/31/97 80.97 227043 SCHLITTT, JOHN J JR 7/31/97 42.54 227044 PAPA, BARRY & DONNA 7/31/97 35.53 227045 STINSON, TARSHA 7/31/97 5.60 227046 BRADY, MAE 7/31/97 43.04 227047 LABER, H JANET BUMPUS 7/31/97 94.16 1,556,571.88 10 August 12, 1997 � � i 7.C. Hammock Lakes Phase I Planned Development - Final Plat Approval & Security Agreement- Onsite Management Group - The Board reviewed a Memorandum dated July 31, 1997: TO: James E. Chandler County Administrator DI vi N HEAD CONCURRENCE: Robert bA. Keating, kdf Community Developm t Dir r '%• S. THROUGH: Stan Boling, AICP Planning Director FROM: Eric Blad, I Staff Plani(er, Current Development DATE: July 31, 1997 SUBJECT: Onsite Management Group, Inc's Request for Final Plat Approval for Hammock Lakes Phase I Planned Development It is requested that the data herein presented be given formal consideration by the Board of County Commissioners at its regular meeting of August 12, 1997. DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS: Hammock Lakes is an approved, two phase, single family residential planned development (PD) project bordered by 58th Avenue (Kings Highway)/Lateral B Canal on its west side and 1st Street S.W. on its north side. The property is zoned RS -3, Residential Single Family (up to 3 units per acre), and is approved to be developed at a density of 2.99 units per acre. Phase I contains 100 lots and comprises 35.22 acres of the overall 68.82 acre project. The proposed final plat is in conformance with the approved conceptual plan and the approved preliminary PD plan/plat. At its regular meeting of September 26, 1995, the Board of County Commissioners granted planned development special exception use approval for the overall project. The Board's action made effective the preliminary PD plat approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission on August 22, 1995. Subsequently, a land development permit was issued for construction of the improvements required to serve the proposed planned development, including the paving of 1st Street S.W. Since construction of required improvements (i.e. roadways, stormwater management, utilities) has not been completed at this time, the developer is proposing to "bond -out" to guarantee the satisfactory completion of the remaining work to be performed. The applicant, Hammock Lakes Association, Ltd., through its agent Onsite Management Group Inc., is now requesting final plat approval for Hammock Lakes Phase I of the project and has submitted the following: 11 August 12, 1997 BOX 4 ,F*'a BQoK 102 fAGE235 A final plat in conformance with the approved conceptual planned development plan and the preliminary planned development plan/plat; 2. An Engineer's Certified Cost Estimate for completion of the remaining required subdivision improvements; 3. A Contract for Construction of required subdivision improvements. 4. A security agreement, acceptable to the county attorney's office, to guarantee the submitted Contract for Construction. ANALYSIS: Not all of the required subdivision improvements have been completed as of this date (i.e. landscaping buffers, roadways, stormwater management, and utility services). In addition to required on-site improvements, the developer is responsible for paving 1st Street S.W. from 58th Avenue to 43rd Avenue, pursuant to an executed developer's agreement with the county. A conceptual design for the paving project has been approved by the public works staff, however, no final paving construction plans have been delivered as of the date of this report. The developer desires to proceed with recording the plat and proposes to "bond -out" for construction of the remaining required on-site and off-site improvements (including the paving of 1st Street S.W.) pursuant to the provisions of subdivision ordinance section 913.10. A certified engineer's cost estimate for completion of the remaining improvements has been reviewed and approved by the Public Works Department, Utilities Services Department, and the Community Development Department. The developer has submitted a contract for construction of required improvements and posted suitable security, approved by the County Attorney's Office, to guarantee the contract. The contract, which is on a standard form approved by the County Attorney's Office, requires on-site and off-site improvements to be completed in one year. With those documents, the developer will have complied with the appropriate requirements to obtain final plat approval. The Board should note that, although the developer is bonding -out for his obligations set forth in the developers agreement, the timing of the actual paving of 1'a Street S.W. could dictate when a lot owner is allowed to occupy a newly built house. Because homes could be built faster than 1'a Street S.W. can be paved, there is a risk that a lot owner with a completed house would need to wait until the end of the construction period (or the completion of actual paving) before being granted a certificate of occupancy (C.O.). Platting will allow lot sales and construction of single family homes. However, under the subdivision ordinance, no C.O.s will be issued until guaranteed on-site and off-site improvements are completed and deemed acceptable. RECOMMENDATION: Based upon the analysis performed, staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners grant final plat approval for Hammock Lakes Phase I, authorize the chairman to execute the contract for construction, and the three party letter agreement with Paul H. Freeman, Trustee, and South Trust Bank of Florida, N.A. to guarantee the contract for construction. IIPa Auug st 12, 1997 i ON MOTION by Commissioner Ginn, SECONDED BY Commissioner Adams, the Board unanimously granted final plat approval for Hammock Lakes Phase I and authorized the Chairman to execute the contract for construction and the three -party letter agreement with Paul H. Freeman, Trustee, and South Trust Bank of Florida, N.A., to guarantee the contract for construction, as recommended in the Memorandum. DOCUMENTS ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD 7.D. Deed Back Right -of -Way Intersection of 78th Avenue and 129th Street to Sylvia Peltier (Laura Lathero-Gay) The Board reviewed Memoranda dated July 23 and July 30, 1997: TO: James W. Davis, P.E., Public Works Director FROM: *ee�R. Keller,/CLA County Attorney's Office THROUGH: Charles*".' trinac CountyAttorney Y DATE: July 23,1997 RE: DRAFT OF COUNTY DEED - LAURA LATHERO-GAY Property on 129th Street between 78th and 79th Avenues The attorney for the mortgagee who has filed foreclosure against Laura Lathero-Gay told the County Attorney that you had agreed that the County would deed this property back to the mortgagee. Therefore, attached is a County Deed that would take care of that once it is signed by the Board of County Commissioners and recorded in the public records of Indian River County. If you need further assistance please let me know. 13 UOK 102 pA August 12, 1997 CE BQOK 102 PAGE 237 TO: James E. Chandler, County Administrator FROM: James W. Davis, P.E., CONSENT AGENDA Public Works Directol'' . SUBJECT: Request from Sylvia Peltier to Deed Back Right-of-way Intersection of 781" Avenue and 1291 Street REF. MEMO: Lea Keller to Jim Davis dated July 23, 1997 DATE: July 30, 1997 DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS Laura Lathero-Gay, resident of Roseland, deeded to the County 35' of 781 Avenue right- of-way and 35' of 129' Street right-of-way which had a mortgage encumbering the property. The mortgagee has foreclosed and is requesting the County deed back the right- of-way. No mortgage release was obtained. ALTERNATIVES AND ANALYSIS Since other property owners along 129' Street have not deeded right-of-way to the County`, for petition paving of 129"' Street, staff has no objection to deeding back the right-of-way to Sylvia Peltier, the mortgagee. RECOMMENDATIONS AND FUNDING Staff recommends that the County deed back to Mrs. Peltier the 78`" Avenue and 129' Street right-of-way. No funding is required. ON MOTION by Commissioner Ginn, SECONDED BY Commissioner Adams, the Board unanimously approved the 78`h Avenue and 129`h Street right-of-way be deeded back to Mrs. Sylvia Peltier, as recommended in the Memorandum. COPY OF DEED ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD 7.E. Country Club Pointe S/D- Dock License Agreement - VanKleeck The Board reviewed a Memorandum dated July 10, 1997: 14 August 12, 1997 TO: The Board of County Commissioners FROM: William G. Collins II - Deputy County Attorney DATE: July 10, 1997 SUBJECT: Dock License Agreement - Country Club Pointe Subdivision On December 30, 1991 Mr. and Mrs. Frederick M. Droege entered into a License Agreement with Indian River County (recorded at O.R. Book 0920, Page 2153 of the Public Records of Indian River County) for the use of the County's riparian land for a dock facility, and in March of 1994 the License Agreement was subsequently modified (O.R. Book 1011, Page 2087). On May 30, 1997 the Droeges sold their Country Club Pointe property (Lot 16, Block 2, Replat of Country Club Pointe, Unit 1) to Mr. David B. Van Kleeck. Covenant No. 9 of the Droege License Agreement provides that upon sale of the Droege property, the License Agreement terminates, however the purchaser can enter into a similar license agreement with the County. Mr. Van Kleeck has expressed a desire to enter into such a license agreement with Indian River County, and a similar License Agreement is attached. RECOMMENDATION: Approve the attached License Agreement between Indian River County and Mr. David B. Van Kleeck subject to the required liability insurance being in place and the receipt of the required license fee; and authorize the Chairman to execute the License Agreement prior to recording in the Public Records of Indian River County, Florida. ON MOTION by Commissioner Ginn, SECONDED BY Commissioner Adams, the Board unanimously approved the License Agreement with David B. VanKleeck, subject to the required liability insurance being in place and the receipt of the required license fee, and authorized the Chairman to execute the License Agreement prior to recording in the Public Records of Indian River County, as recommended in the Memorandum. COPY OF LICENSE AGREEMENT ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD 15 August 12, 1997 6QQK 102 PAGE 236 WK 102 PAGE 239 7.F. Recently Acquired Properties — Tax Cancellations The Board reviewed a Memorandum dated July 28, 1997: TO: Board of County Commissioners FROM: Lea R. Keller, CLA Certified Legal Assistant County Attorney's Office DATE: July 28, 1997 RE: Recently Acquired Properties - Tax Cancellations The County recently acquired some property and, pursuant to Section 196.28, F.S., the Board of County Commissioners is allowed to cancel and discharge any taxes owed on the portion of the property acquired for public purpose. Such cancellation must be done by resolution with a certified copy being forward to the Tax Collector (and copies sent to the Property Appraiser and Fixed Assets). Requested Action: Board authorize the Chairman to sign the attached resolutions canceling taxes upon lands the County recently acquired. Attachments: Resolutions and Legals - Barkett -3 parcels on 43rd Ave. Brooks -1 parcel on 58th Ave. Mason Land, Inc. - 1 parcel on Oslo Rd. & 27th Ave. Stettner - 1 parcel on 43rd Ave. ON MOTION by Commissioner Ginn, SECONDED BY Commissioner Adams, the Board unanimously adopted Resolution No. 97-073, canceling certain delinquent taxes upon publicly owned lands, pursuant to Section 196.28 Florida Statutes, as recommended in the Memorandum. (George and Sue Barkett — 43`d Avenue, Parcel 9175) 16 August 12, 1997 Re: 43rd Avenue - Parcel #175 Parcel ID 10-33-39-00006-0020-00008.0 George and Sue Barkett RESOLUTION NO. 97 --:;3 A RESOLUTION OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, CANCELLING CERTAIN DELINQUENT TAXES UPON PUBLICLY OWNED LANDS, PURSUANT TO SECTION 196.28, FLORIDA STATUTES. WHEREAS, Section 196.28, Florida Statutes, allows the Board of County Commissioners of each County to cancel and discharge any and all liens for taxes, delinquent or current, held or owned by the county or the state, upon lands heretofore or hereafter conveyed to or acquired by any agency, governmental subdivision, or municipality of the state, or the United States, for road purposes, defense purposes, recreation, reforestation, or other public use; and WHEREAS, such cancellation must be by resolution of the Board of County Commissioners, duly adopted and entered upon its minutes properly describing such lands and setting forth the public use to which the same are or will be devoted; and WHEREAS, upon receipt of a certified copy of such resolution, proper officials of the county and of the state are authorized, empowered, and directed to make proper entries upon the records to accomplish such cancellation and to do all things necessary to cavy out the provisions of Section 196.28, F.S.; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that: 1. Any and all liens for taxes, delinquent or current, against the property described in OR Book 1161, Page 1645, which was recently acquired by Indian River County for right of way are hereby canceled, pursuant to the authority of Section 196.28, F.S. 2. The Clerk to the Board of County Commissioners is hereby directed to send a certified copy of this resolution to the Tax Collector and the Property Appraiser. The resolution was moved for adoption by Commissioner Ci nn and the motion was seconded by Commissioner Adams and, upon being put to a vote, the vote was as follows: Chairman Carolyn K. Eggert Aye Vice Chairman John W. Tippin Aye Commissioner Kenneth R. Macht Aye Commissioner Fran B. Adams Aye Commissioner Caroline D. Ginn Aye The Chairman thereupon declared the resolution duly passed and adopted this 12 day of August, 1997. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSI NERS Carolyn�f Eggert ,ton? Cle _ -N r Chifirman August 12,1997 Yr3 no 17 In6i2a River co AOGroved Admin. 9 Legal cC/ Budgel Risk Mgt. B90K 1U, MEW- CQ w ca i CERTIFICATION I, Charles A. Cromer, hereby certify that I am a registered Professional Surveyor and Mapper licensed to practice in the of Florida, that this sketch was made under my immediate supervision, and that it is accurate and correct. I further c that this sketch meets the Minimum Technical standards as described in Chapter 61G17 of the Florida Administrative Cc pursuant to F.S. Chapter 472. THIS IS NOT A SUI &AM SKETCH TO ACCOMPANY LE PREPARED FOR INDIAN RIVER COUNTY E Charles A. Cromer, P.S.M. Reg. #4094 1840 25th St, Vero Beach, FL 32960 Indian River County Surveyor (561) 567-8000 Date 00 7-4 1 ti oS ON N I o 40' Plat a d () I j LOT 8 Y 0 j 2 °- o- Q I � a LOT 9 W m C14 ¢ r1 LEGAL DESCRIPTION LEGAL > The West 5 feet of the North 26 feet of Lot 9, AND the West 5 feet of the South 4 feet of Lot 8, I both in Block 2 of Valencia Park, according to the plat recorded in Plat Book 1, Page 46 of the Public Records of Indian River County, Florida. Lying in Indian River County, Florida. _ I X31 2 15TH CL , 0 co CERTIFICATION I, Charles A. Cromer, hereby certify that I am a registered Professional Surveyor and Mapper licensed to practice in the of Florida, that this sketch was made under my immediate supervision, and that it is accurate and correct. I further c that this sketch meets the Minimum Technical standards as described in Chapter 61G17 of the Florida Administrative Cc pursuant to F.S. Chapter 472. THIS IS NOT A SUI &AM SKETCH TO ACCOMPANY LE PREPARED FOR INDIAN RIVER COUNTY E Charles A. Cromer, P.S.M. Reg. #4094 1840 25th St, Vero Beach, FL 32960 Indian River County Surveyor (561) 567-8000 Date 00 7-4 1 ti oS ON N ON MOTION by Commissioner Ginn, SECONDED BY Commissioner Adams, the Board unanimously adopted Resolution No. 97-074, canceling certain delinquent taxes upon publicly owned lands, pursuant to Section 196.28, Florida Statutes, as recommended in the Memorandum. (George and Sue Barkett, 43rd Avenue, Parcel #176) Re: 43rd Avenue - Parcel # 176 Parcel ID 10-33-39-00006-0020-00007.0 George and Sue Barkett RESOLUTION NO. 97-:34 A RESOLUTION OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, CANCELLING CERTAIN DELINQUENT TAXES UPON PUBLICLY OWNED LANDS, PURSUANT TO SECTION 196.28, FLORIDA STATUTES. WHEREAS, Section 196.28, Florida Statutes, allows the Board of County Commissioners of each County to cancel and discharge any and all liens for taxes, delinquent or current, held or owned by the county or the state, upon lands heretofore or hereafter conveyed to or acquired by any agency, governmental subdivision, or municipality of the state, or the United States, for road purposes, defense purposes, recreation, reforestation, or other public use; and WHEREAS, such cancellation must be by resolution of the Board of County Commissioners, duly adopted and entered upon its minutes properly describing such lands and setting forth the public use to which the same are or will be devoted; and WHEREAS, upon receipt of a certified copy of such resolution, proper officials of the county and of the state are authorized, empowered, and directed to make proper entries upon the records to accomplish such cancellation and to do all things necessary to carry out the provisions of Section 196.28. F.S.; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that: 1. Any and all liens for taxes, delinquent or current, against the property described in OR Book 1161, Page 1647, which was recently acquired by Indian River County for right of way are hereby canceled, pursuant to the authority of Section 196.28, F.S. 2. The Clerk to the Board of County Commissioners is hereby directed to send a certified copy of this resolution to the Tax Collector and the Property Appraiser. The resolution was moved for adoption by Commissioner ,inn and the motion was seconded by Commissioner Adams , and, upon being put to a vote, the vote was as follows: Chairman Carolyn K Eggert Aye Vice Chairman John W. Tippin Aye Commissioner Kenneth R. Macht Aye Commissioner Fran B. Adams Aye Commissioner Caroline D. Ginn Aye The Chairman thereupon declared the resolution duly passed and adopted this 1_ day of August, 1997. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Carolyn t Eggert -- -�y Chairman s.. 19 d� 690K 1U P.1EE itis,: August 12, 1997 .- lgto LEGAL DESCRIPTION The West 5 feet of the South 10 feet of Lot 7, AND the West 5 feet of the North 20 feet of Lot 8, both in Block 2 of Valencia Park, according to the plot recorded in Plat Book 1, Page 46 of the Public Records of Indian River County, Florida. Lying in Indian River County, Florida. ORI 161Pc CERTIFICATION I, Charles A. Cromer, hereby certify that I am a registered Professional Surveyor and Mapper licensed to practice in the of Florida, that this sketch was made under my immediate supervision, and that it is accurate and correct. I further that this sketch meets the Minimum Technical standards as described in Chapter 61 G 17 of the Floridan Administrative Cc Pursuant to F.S. Chapter 472. THIS IS NOT A SU p SKETCH TO ACCOMPANY LE Charles A. Cramer, P.S.M. Reg. #4094 1840 25th St, Vero Beach, FL 32960 PREPARED FOR INDIAN RIVER COUNTY E Indian River County Surveyor (561) 567-8000 Date 2,p/90 0 N 1 H 1 o o LO y Q o � � a LOT 7 Q L U o z 2 J m tl � o a- bi LOT 8 LO CERTIFICATION I, Charles A. Cromer, hereby certify that I am a registered Professional Surveyor and Mapper licensed to practice in the of Florida, that this sketch was made under my immediate supervision, and that it is accurate and correct. I further that this sketch meets the Minimum Technical standards as described in Chapter 61 G 17 of the Floridan Administrative Cc Pursuant to F.S. Chapter 472. THIS IS NOT A SU p SKETCH TO ACCOMPANY LE Charles A. Cramer, P.S.M. Reg. #4094 1840 25th St, Vero Beach, FL 32960 PREPARED FOR INDIAN RIVER COUNTY E Indian River County Surveyor (561) 567-8000 Date 2,p/90 0 N 1 H 1 ON MOTION by Commissioner Ginn, SECONDED BY Commissioner Adams, the Board unanimously adopted Resolution 97-075, canceling certain delinquent taxes upon publicly owned lands, pursuant to Section 196.28, Florida Statutes, as recommended in the Memorandum. (George and Sue Barkett, 43rd Avenue, Parcel #177) Re: 43rd Avenue - Parcel #177 Parcel ID 10-33-39-00006-0020-00006.0 George and Sue Barkett RESOLUTION NO. 97--M— A 7-M A RESOLUTION OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, CANCELLING CERTAIN DELINQUENT TAXES UPON PUBLICLY OWNED LANDS, PURSUANT TO SECTION 196.28, FLORIDA STATUTES. WHEREAS, Section 196.28, Florida Statutes, allows the Board of County Commissioners of each County to cancel and discharge any and all liens for taxes, delinquent or current, held or owned by the county or the state, upon lands heretofore or hereafter conveyed to or acquired by any agency, governmental subdivision, or municipality of the state, or the United States, for road purposes, defense purposes, recreation, reforestation, or other public use; and WHEREAS, such cancellation must be by resolution of the Board of County Commissioners, duly adopted and entered upon its minutes properly describing such lands and setting forth the public use to which the same are or will be devoted; and WHEREAS, upon receipt of a certified copy of such resolution, proper officials of the county and of the state are authorized, empowered, and directed to make proper entries upon the records to accomplish such cancellation and to do all things necessary to carry out the provisions of Section 196.28, F.S.; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that: 1. Any and all liens for taxes, delinquent or current, against the property described in OR Book 1161, Page 1649, which was recently acquired by Indian River County for right of way are hereby canceled, pursuant to the authority of Section 196.28, F.S. 2. The Clerk to the Board of County Commissioners is hereby directed to send a certified copy of this resolution to the Tax Collector and the Property Appraiser. The resolution was moved for adoption by Commissioner _rinn and the motion was seconded by Commissioner Adams and, upon being put to a vote, the vote was as follows: Chairman Carolyn K Eggert Aye Vice Chairman John W. Tippin Aye Commissioner Kenneth R. Macht Aye Commissioner Fran B. Adams Aye Commissioner Caroline D. Ginn Aye The Chairman thereupon declared the resolution duly passed and adopted this 12 day of August, 1997. Clerk .0 , P mp: 21 August 12, 1997 BOARD OF OUNTY COMMISSI NERS BY —=/ Carolyok Eggert Qy C airman ry FAG E 4o am CP ca y CERTIFICATION I, Charles A. Cromer, hereby certify that I am a registered Professional Surveyor and Mapper licensed to practice in th of Florida, that this sketch was made under my immediate supervision, and that it is accurate and correct. I further that this sketch meets the Minimum Technical standards as described in Chapter 61G17 of the Florida Administrative C pursuant to F.S. Chapter 472. O_ Charles A. Cromer, P.S.M. Reg. #4094 Indian River County Surveyor 1840 25th St, Vero Beach, FL 32960 (561) 567-8000 THIS IS NOT A Sl SKETCH TO ACCOMPANY L PREPARED FOR INDIAN RIVER COUNTY Date r aN as Ci �F n I I ^O 1 L Ln LQ � Y I � j o < v' IQ 6 oLOT Q r z LEGAL DESCRIPTION I 0 2 J m The West 5 feet of the South 20 feet of Lot 6, AND the West 5 feet of the North 10 feet of Lot 7, I o both in Block 2 of Valencia Park, according to the plot , .2 N N recorded in Plot Book 1, Page 46 of the Public o LOT 7 Records of Indian River County, Florida. I LO Lying in Indian River County, Florida. , 40' Plot CERTIFICATION I, Charles A. Cromer, hereby certify that I am a registered Professional Surveyor and Mapper licensed to practice in th of Florida, that this sketch was made under my immediate supervision, and that it is accurate and correct. I further that this sketch meets the Minimum Technical standards as described in Chapter 61G17 of the Florida Administrative C pursuant to F.S. Chapter 472. O_ Charles A. Cromer, P.S.M. Reg. #4094 Indian River County Surveyor 1840 25th St, Vero Beach, FL 32960 (561) 567-8000 THIS IS NOT A Sl SKETCH TO ACCOMPANY L PREPARED FOR INDIAN RIVER COUNTY Date r aN as Ci �F ON MOTION by Commissioner Ginn, SECONDED BY Commissioner Adams, the Board unanimously adopted Resolution 97-076, canceling certain delinquent taxes upon publicly owned lands, pursuant to Section 196.28, Florida Statutes, as recommended in the Memorandum. (Harold and Barbara Brooks, 58 h Avenue at Oslo Road) Re: 58th Avenue at Oslo Road Parcel ID 21-33-39-00001-0050-00001.0 Harold and Barbara Brooks RESOLUTION NO. 97. g6 A RESOLUTION OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, CANCELLING CERTAIN DELINQUENT TAXES UPON PUBLICLY OWNED LANDS, PURSUANT TO SECTION 196.28, FLORIDA STATUTES. WHEREAS, Section 196.28, Florida Statutes, allows the Board of County Commissioners of each County to cancel and discharge any and all liens for taxes, delinquent or current, held or owned by the county or the state, upon lands heretofore or hereafter conveyed to or acquired by any agency, governmental subdivision, or municipality of the state, or the United States, for road purposes, defense purposes, recreation, reforestation, or other public use; and WHEREAS, such cancellation must be by resolution of the Board of County Commissioners, duly adopted and entered upon its minutes properly describing such lands and setting forth the public use to which the same are or will be devoted; and WHEREAS, upon receipt of a certified copy of such resolution, proper officials of the county and of the state are authorized, empowered, and directed to make proper entries upon the records to accomplish such cancellation and to do all things necessary to cant' out the provisions of Section 196.28, F.S.; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that: 1. Any and all liens for taxes, delinquent or current, against the property described in OR Book 1162, Page 1058, which was recently acquired by Indian River County for right of way are hereby canceled, pursuant to the authority of Section 196.28, F.S. 2. The Clerk to the Board of County Commissioners is hereby directed to send a certified copy of this resolution to the Tax Collector and the Property Appraiser. The resolution was moved for adoption by Commissioner Ginn , and the motion was seconded by Commissioner Adams and, upon being put to a vote, the vote was as follows: Chairman Carolyn K EggertAye Vice Chairman John W. Tippin Aye Commissioner Kenneth R. Macht Aye Commissioner Fran B. Adams Aye Commissioner Caroline D. Ginn Aye The Chairman thereupon declared the resolution duly passed and adopted this _12 day of August, 1997. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIO RS Attest:. _ By Caroly Eggert ClVairman 23 August 12, 1997 BGOK 10' PAGE 246 C*1 W a C3. co Scale: 1"=200' le of !c Eos; 28.05 Acres of Wes: 20.57 Acres Tract ' 3 -' i Trac. 14 to < _F v _xis: R/%A ��/ /Z // 920.99' 920.9.V1111111 .d . �� 673.39'/����/tb 20�? — 3;'— — — — o OSLO ROAD C i 29128 CANAL LEGAL DESCRIPTION t The Nortr, 70 fee: o` the Soutr 12C fee; a' the East 28.05 acres o`. Troc; 13, one of the X H f f f T t ff t West 20.5 acres o** Tract 14, Sectior 21, Townsnip 33 South-, Range 3� Eos;, according to the las: genero' plot. of the longs of the Indian Rive, Forms Compon) recoroec in Plat Book 2, - Pace 25 0' the °ubiic Records a-' S;. _ucie County, Floridc. Containinc 11 1,606.6 souare fee: o• 2.562 acres. Now hying in Indior Rive' County, Fioridc. 3 CEMICATION r I, Cnorles A. Cromer, hereby certify that I am a registered Professional Surveyor one Ma c 9 y Mapper licensed to practice in the state C of Florida, that this sketch was mace unaer my immediate supervision., and that i; is accurate and correct. I further certify 05 that this sketch meets the Minimum Technical standards as described in Chapter 61G17 of the Floridc Administrative Code, C pursuant to F.S. Chapter 472. THIS IS NOT A SURVEY `` SKETCH TO ACCOMPANY LEGAL DESCRIPTION PREPARED FOR INDIAN RIVER COUNTY ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT Charles A. Cromer, P.S.M. Rec. #4094' 1840 25th S,, Verc Beach, F:- 32960 Indian River Count) Surveyor (561 ) 567-8000 Dote -'.:��'v % �' — j < N 1 1 t - ON Ch 7-4 ON MOTION by Commissioner Ginn, SECONDED BY Commissioner Adams, the Board unanimously adopted Resolution 97-077, canceling certain delinquent taxes upon publicly owned lands, pursuant to Section 196.28, Florida Statutes, as recommended in the Memorandum. (Mason Land, Inc., Oslo Road & 27`h Avenue) Re: Oslo Road $ 27th Avenue Parcel ID 27-33-39-00001-0010-00001.0 Mason Land, Inc. RESOLUTION NO. 97- V _ A RESOLUTION OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, CANCELLING CERTAIN DELINQUENT TAXES UPON PUBLICLY OWNED LANDS, PURSUANT TO SECTION 196.28, FLORIDA STATUTES. WHEREAS, Section 196.28, Florida Statutes, allows the Board of County Commissioners of each County to cancel and discharge any and all liens for taxes, delinquent or current, held or owned by the county or the state, upon lands heretofore or hereafter conveyed to or acquired by any agency, governmental subdivision, or municipality of the state, or the United States, for road purposes, defense purposes, recreation, reforestation, or other public use; and WHEREAS, such cancellation must be by resolution of the Board of County Commissioners, duly adopted and entered upon its minutes properly describing such lands and setting forth the public use to which the same are or will be devoted; and WHEREAS, upon receipt of a certified copy of such resolution, proper officials of the county and of the state are authorized, empowered, and directed to make proper entries upon the records to accomplish such cancellation and to do all things necessary to carry out the provisions of Section 196.28, F.S.; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that: 1. Any and all liens for taxes, delinquent or current, against the property described in OR Book 1163, Page 1105, which was recently acquired by Indian River County for right of way are hereby canceled, pursuant to the authority of Section 196.28, F.S. 2. The Clerk to the Board of County Commissioners is hereby directed to send a certified copy of this resolution to the Tax Collector and the Property Appraiser. The resolution was moved for adoption by Commissioner 6i nn , and the motion was seconded by Commissioner Adams and, upon being put to a vote, the vote was as follows: Chairman Carolyn K Eggert Aye Vice Chairman John W. Tippin Aye Commissioner Kenneth R. Macht Aye Commissioner Fran B. Adams Aye Commissioner Caroline D. Ginn Aye The Chairman thereupon declared the resolution duty passed and adopted this 12 day of August, 1997. J. n CI@rk .0 slamp: 4.1 August 12, 1997 BOARD OFC UNTY COMMISSIO RS By _ '4/. Carolyn . Eggert Chairman to 0 C-0 30' 30' Scale: 1"=100' 635.55' U N P L A T T E D of MASON LAND INC. 27-33-39 .0 I Q N 00001 00 N 0010 04 Z 0C 00001.0 20' 20' R W Line 635.55' R1W Linein _ An77H N -VENUE 271-4 22 N _� Section Line & East Line Tract 1 N 26 23 LEGAL DESCRIPTION R/W Line The West 20 feet of the East 45 feet, LESS the North 30 feet, of the North 5 acres of the East 10 acres of Tract 1, Section 27, Township 33 South, Range 39 East, according to the lost general plat of the lands of the Indian River Farms Company recorded in Plot Book 2, Page 25 of the Public Records of St. Lucie County, Florida. z Containing 12,711 square feet. Lying in Indian River County, Florida. v o$ CE MMICATION N I, Charles A. Cramer, hereby certify that I am a registered Professional Surveyor and Mapper licensed to practice in the state of Florida, that this sketch was made under my immediate supervision, and that it is accurate and correct. I further certify that this sketch meets the Minimum Technical standards as described in Chapter 61G17 of the Florida Administrative Code, rn pursuant to F.S. Chapter 472. THIS IS NOT A SURVEY SKETCH TO ACCOMPANY LEGAL DESCRIPTION PREPARED FOR INDIAN RIVER COUNTY ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT o Charles A. Cramer, P.S.M. Reg_ #4094 1840 25th St, Vero Beach, FL 32960 Indian River County Surveyor (561) 567-8000 Date 271y1�/ 199x7 Q N I. ON MOTION by Commissioner Ginn, SECONDED BY Commissioner Adams, the Board unanimously adopted Resolution 97-078, canceling certain delinquent taxes upon publicly owned lands, pursuant to Section 196.28, Florida Statutes, as recommended in the Memorandum. (Charles and Callista Stettner, 43rd Avenue, Parcel #179) Re: 43rd Avenue - Parcel #179 Parcel ID 10-33-39-00006-0010-00008.0 Charles and Callista Stettner RESOLUTION NO. 97- 78 A RESOLUTION OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, CANCELLING CERTAIN DELINQUENT TAXES UPON PUBLICLY OWNED LANDS, PURSUANT TO SECTION 196.28, FLORIDA STATUTES. WHEREAS, Section 196.28, Florida Statutes, allows the Board of County Commissioners of each County to cancel and discharge any and all liens for taxes, delinquent or current, held or owned by the county or the state, upon lands heretofore or hereafter conveyed to or acquired by any agency, governmental subdivision, or municipality of the state, or the United States, for road purposes, defense purposes, recreation, reforestation, or other public use; and WHEREAS, such cancellation must be by resolution of the Board of County Commissioners, duly adopted and entered upon its minutes properly describing such lands and setting forth the public use to which the same are or will be devoted; and WHEREAS, upon receipt of a certified copy of such resolution, proper officials of the county and of the state are authorized, empowered, and directed to make proper entries upon the records to accomplish such cancellation and to do all things necessary to carry out the provisions of Section 196.28, F.S.; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that 1. Any and all liens for taxes, delinquent or current, against the property described in OR Book 1163, Page 1103, which was recently acquired by Indian River County for right of way are hereby canceled, pursuant to the authority of Section 196.28, F.S. 2. The Clerk to the Board of County Commissioners is hereby directed to send a certified copy of this resolution to the Tax Collector and the Property Appraiser. The resolution was moved for adoption by Commissioner r,; nn and the motion was seconded by Commissioner Adams and, upon being put to a vote, the vote was as follows: Chairman Carolyn K Eggert Aye Vice Chairman John W. Tippin Aye Commissioner Kenneth R. Macht Aye Commissioner Fran B. Adams Aye Commissioner Caroline D. Ginn Aye The Chairman thereupon declared the resolution duty passed and adopted this 12 day of August, 1997. t: J Clerk 27 August 12, 1997 BOARD OLS COUNTY COMMISSIONERS By _ Carolyn Eggert C firman BOOK Ur✓ PACE 40U ko CQ Ne CD ca 40' Plat PiJRCFL � No. I79 FE) H f B ! T "A" . , y' LU LOT 8 Y 1 In Q Q o U IL Z b LOT 9 J LEGAL DESCRIPTIONinQ The West 5 feet of the South 25 feet of Lot 8, , AND the West 5 feet of the North 5 feet of Lot 9, in Block 1 of Vclencio Park, according to the plat recorded in Plot Book 1, Page 46 of the Public , Records of Indian River County, Florida. 0 15TH o PLACE 3 CERTIFICATION N z I, Charles A. Cramer, hereby certify that I am a registered Professional Surveyor and Mapper licensed to practice in the state a of Florida, that this sketch was made under my immediate supervision, and that it is accurate and correct. I further certify n that this sketch meets the Minimum Technical standards as described in Chapter 61G17 of the Florida Administrative Code, pursuant to F.S. Chapter 472. THIS IS NOT A SURVEY �� /J SKETCH TO ACCOMPANY LEGAL DESCRIPTION 3 PREPARED FOR INDIAN RIVER COUNTY ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT o Charles A. Cromer, P.S.M. Reg. #4094 1840 25th St, Vero Beach, FL 32960 Indian River County Surveyor (561 ) 567-8000 Dote 1_5a�� 9� � i 1 F-] ci 7.G. Fiber Optic Cable Contract — Final Payment — Precision Contracting Services, Inc. (PCS) The Board reviewed a Memorandum dated August 4, 1997: Date: August 4, 1997 To: Honorable Board of County Commissioners Thru: James E. Chandler County Administrator From: H.T. "Son"" Dean, Director Department of General Se es Subject: Fiber Optic Cable Contract - Final Payment BACKGROUND: CONSENT AGENDA On August 13, 1996 the Board approved a contract amendment with Precision Contracting Services, Inc. (PCS) to purchase all necessary cable electronic equipment, install said equipment and perform the necessary integration work for the new 800MHz radio system. The cost to perform this work was not to exceed $363,245. In accordance with policy, staff has held a 5% retainage until such time as this portion of the system was completed and properly performing. PCS has completed their scope of work as specified in the contract. In accordance with the contract PCS has requested their retainage be released RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends Board approval to release the retainage of $6,100.87 to PCS as per the agreed on contract. ON MOTION by Commissioner Ginn, SECONDED BY Commissioner Adams, the Board unanimously approved release of the retainage of $6,100.87 to PCS as per the agreed on contract, as recommended in the Memorandum. 7.H. Indian River County Jail — Fire Alarm and Fire Sprinklers Repair August 12, 1997 The Board reviewed a Memorandum dated August 1, 1997: 29 090K 1U42 f'ACE �3 2 890K 102 PACE "bj TO: James Chandler County Administrator THRU: H.T. "Sonny" Dean, Director Department of General Services FROM: Lynn Williams, Superintenden of Buildings & Grounds DATE: August 1, 1997 SUBJECT: Indian River County Jail, Fire Alarm and Fire Sprinklers Repairs CONSENT AGENDA DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS: During recent annual inspections conducted by the Indian River County Fire District and Southern Security Systems (Counties Contractor), several deficiencies were noted throughout the fire alarm systems serving the Indian River County Jail. The consensus of the inspection/testing is that the present system ranging from eleven (11) to six (6) years old are unable to be economically and reliably repaired. Much of the equipment is no longer in production making individual component replacement impractical. The backbone components (main panel processors) remain in "trouble" and/or issue "false alarms" on a regular basis. The present system, "if" the parts could be located could cost as much as thirty five thousand dollars ($35,000) to repair and would still be unreliable. An urgency exists in that we are barely protected in the present condition and are exposed to extensive liability. This repair must be effected as soon as practical. In addition to the fire alarm condition, on July 23, 1997, a fire sprinkler test was conducted. Phase II aka Building C, Inmate Housing, experienced several leaks in the main fire sprinkler distribution line. Due to the installation and type of pipe specified and installed water collected and stayed in the dry pipe section of the system, causing premature failure. The recommendation was made by the Fire Sprinkler Contractor to replace the entire portion of fire sprinkler lines rather than attempt to repair small sections scattered throughout the line. An emergency purchase order was issued for replacement/repair at a cost of $15,000 (not to exceed). Wiginton Fire Sprinklers, our contractor for inspection and repairs of fire sprinkler systems expected to be completed by August 18, 1997. Schedule 40 pipe has been specified for the replacement section (approximately 380') of main line. All existing sprinklers will he removed and cleaned of debris which has collected in the lines. The system will he retested upon completion of the work. 30 August 12, 1997 � a � ALTERNATIVES AND ANALYSIS: Fire Alarm - Staff contacted Southern Security Systems which is our present Contractor for alarm monitoring, inspection and repairs to ascertain the extent of the repairs and associated cost. The attached proposal covers the estimated expense for replacement of all components (as known from as -built drawings). The proposal allows for County staff participation in the installation. We expect this to save significantly in the cost and will allow us to gain a greater understanding of the system layout, operation and required maintenance. The proposed components are the latest technology and are still in production. They will be addressable in the sense that every detector, switch or horn has it's own identification and will allow for immediate diagnosis of problems. All detectors will be self testing and self adjusting for sensitivity, making inspection much easier and reducing false alarms. RECOMMENDATION AND FUNDING,: Staff recommends the proposal from Southern Security for the full amount $67,300 including components, wire and labor be approved and that work begin as soon as possible. According to Purchasing Guidelines, after the fact authorization must be obtained for emergency purchases of this amount. Staff recommends that the fire sprinkler repairs be authorized. Staff also recommends that funding be authorized for this expenditure and include $16,000 for the fire sprinkler repairs. Total required $83,300.00. ON MOTION by Commissioner Grin, SECONDED BY Commissioner Adams, the Board unanimously authorized fire sprinkler repairs for the Indian River County Jail; approved accepting proposal from Southern Security in the amount of $67,300, including components, wire and labor, and authorized expenditure of $16,000 for the fire sprinkler repairs, as recommended in the Memorandum. (Total $832300.00) CONTRACT WILL BE ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD WHEN EXECUTED AND RECEIVED 31 August 12, 1997 B®0K IRI PAGE;5 d t - C i 0 40. 0 M Florida Counties Foundation and the Florida Institute of Government present COUNTY GOVERNMENT SERVICES September 12, 1997 Radisson Plaza Hotel Orlando, Florida Cuunty Cummiasirs Ccrll(Iwnun ^ y'ZA25 N" co o: Z N, ABOUT THE PROGRAM �Ct I' L • � �Z! l l 016 The Florida Counties Foundation's Commissioners Voluntary Certification Program is a newly created program that began November, 1996. The idea for this educational endeavor originated from the Florida Association of Counties Long Range Plan, adopted by the EAC general a, membership in June, 1995. M Certification requirements for this 2 -year E c 0 � uw program include twenty-four hours of core � 0 to curriculum and six hours of continuing a .1 W N m education for a total of thirty hours. E c "County Government Services" is the second v r six (6) hour core curriculum course offered by u the Foundation. This workshop is designed to help county commissioners understand the U state agency process and how it relates to �. local government. It will broaden their knowledge of county government form and vE C function, both past and future. o w 2 Commisionsers will also learn abut the o process of the 1998 Constitution Revision w Commission and its possible impact on C 0to 0 county government. Register as soon as U 3 M L c possible because seating is limited. o y � o . ' E 6� TE - >0�of W 0.. O (X U u N M 1 1 ci 1 [1 E! pQ Count y V Commbs n Certl/lcat on WHY YOU SHOULD ATTEND To broaden your knowledge of county government form and function J To understand the state agency process and how it relates to local government J To learn about the process of the Constitution Revision Commission and understand its implications in relation to county government J To interact and exchange information with your peers WHO SHOULD ATTEND J Commissioners participating in the Commissioners Voluntary Certification Program Commissioners with a special interest in county government structure FEE The fee for the workshop is $75. This include:, morning coffee and danish, lunch, afternoon sodas, and materials. AGENDA 8:30 a.m. - 4:30 p.m. (Registration begins at 8:00 a.m.) O County Government Form and Function ❑ Intergovernmental Relations O 1998 Constitution Revision Commission HOTEL INFORMATION Radisson Plaza Hotel Orlando 60 South Ivanhoe Blvd Orlando, Florida 32804 (407) 425-4455 Special Room Rate: $69 single or double. To receive this special rate. registrations must be made by Aug 22nd. After Aug 22, rates begin at $114. Make your reservations directly with the hotel. Tax Exempt Status: . To qualify for tax-exempt status, supply the hotel with a copy of your county tax-exempt certificate with your reservation form. The account must be paid in full with either a county credit card or check. (A personal check or credit card to be reimbursed by your county does not qualify for tax-exempt status.) Connty commstsrs Cerfllkt�n REGISTRATION FORM Advance Registration is Required County Government Services September 12, 1997 (Please print or type. You may duplicate this form for addtional registralions.) Name Soc. Sec.# _ County_ /&O/*V Address tV4*0 City -A9k1 4&WGK Zip code Day phone # X Fax #_m ❑ Payment Enclosed ($75.00) ❑ Bill P.O. # Please make check payable to: University of Central Florida Mail to: Florida Institute of Government 36 W. Pine Street, Suite 204 Orlando, FL 32801-2612 (407) 317-7745 or SC 344-7745 A confirmation letter and drections to workshop site will be sent upon receipt of registration form. en M 0 Cam BOOK 102 PAGE(wJ . ON MOTION by Commissioner Ginn, SECONDED BY Commissioner Adams, the Board unanimously approved out- of utof county travel for Commissioners to attend the County Government Services Meeting in Orlando on September 12, 1997, as requested. 8. CONSTITUTIONAL OFFICERS AND GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES None 9.A. PUBLIC HEARING — ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE AND MAP FROM A-1 TO RM -8 — S.W. CORNER OF 90TH AVENUE AND 26TH STREET (17.5+/- ACRES) — REQUESTED BY JACQUELYN S. REED PRESS-JouRNPA Published Dally Vero Beach, Indian River County, Florida COUNTY OF INDIAN RIVER: STATE OF FLORIDA ithorioath se that he Is P►�Ident of tFle tfPrfs,l parmlp Y appeared Darryl K Hicks who an In Irdlen River Oourhty, Florida: that the attadied ropy b newspaper published at Vero Bestir in the matter of-Le�t.CJL k l th In the Court. was Pub- lished In said newspaper In the Issues of - 30 , 161!2 — 17 X06 esaya that he said Press•Jaunal Is a newspaper pubOstled at Vero Bean, in * Plain said I dah�Rli. y Flada e�y a d has s=V class mail matter at the post office in Vero Beach, in said braan R(ver Canty. Florida, for a perbd of one year rext precedtrrg the first publicatloo of the attadred try of fit: and afflam further says that the has neither paid nor promised any Parson, firm = fe 4d Wit, or rahad for the purpose of seaabig this •..�. • •�•.aD.1 1ANm0)•MCI kt �. COA.NO. CC61imJmt (SEAL) : �Q� Nota Public. State of Florida 0• . My Commission Exp..Jae n1.','0(-1 •'+ B[�' •••" 0�•. Comm. No. CC 61122 °+ Cpl`:•• Personally Known or Produ• . Type of 10 Produced kill August 12, 1997 T a NOTICE • PUBLIC HEARING The Board of County Commis- j sioners of Indian River County, Florida, will consider the adoption of a county ordinance rezoning land from: A-1, Agricultural District (up to 1 unit/5 acres) to RM -8, Multiple -Family Residential District (up to 8 units/acre). The subject property is owned by Jacquelyn S. Reed, as Trustee. The subject prop- erty is located at the southwest corner of 90th Avenue and 26th Street, and contains approximately 17.5 acres. The subject property lies in the northeast '/4 section of Section 3, Township 33S, Range 38E, lying and being in Indian River County, Florida. A public hearing at which par- ties in. interest and citizens shall have an opportunity to be heard, will be held by the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida, in the County Commission Chambers of the County Administration Building, located at 1840 25th Street, Vero Beach, Florida on Tuesday, August 12, 1997, at 9:05 a.m. The pro- posed ordinance to rezone the sub- ject property is entitled: AN ORDINANCE OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE AND THE ACCOM. PANYING ZONING MAP FROM, A-1 TO RM -8, FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF 90TH AVENUE AND 26TH STREET, AND DESCRIBED HEREIN, AND PROVIDING FOR EFFECTIVE DATE. The proposed ordinance may be inspected by the public during reg- ular business hours at the office of the Clerk to the Board of County Commissioners, 1840 25th Street, Vero Beach, Florida. For more information, contact John Wachtel at 567-8000, extension 247. The Board of County Commis. sions may adopt another zoning district, other than the district requested, provided it is within the some general use category. Anyone who may wish to appeal any decision which may be made at this meeting will need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which includes testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is based. Anyone who needs a special accommodation for this meeting must contact the county's Ameri. cans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Coordinator at 567-8000 exten- sion 223 at least 48 hours in advance of the meeting. Indian River County Board of County Commissioners By: -s -Carolyn K. Eggert, Chairman July 30, 1997 1130083r Community Development Director Robert M. Keating reviewed a Memorandum dated July 15, 1997 with the aid of a drawing projected on the ELMO: TO: James E. Chandler County Administrator DEP HEAD CONCURRENCE * 9�&t Robert M. Keating,ICP/J THROUGH: Sasan Rohani, AICP � A Chief, Long -Ran a Planning FROM: John Wachtel Senior Plann'r, Long -Range Planning DATE: July 15, 1997 RE: Jacquelyn S. Reed's Request to Rezone Approximately 17.5 Acres from A-1 to RM -8 (RZON 97-06-0004) It is requested that the data herein presented be given formal consideration by the Board of County Commissioners at its regular meeting of August 12, 1997. 35 August 12, 1997 60 10 PAG6201M 890K 102 PAGE 259 This is a request to rezone approximately 17.5 acres located at the southwest corner of 90th Avenue and 26th Street. The request involves rezoning the subject property, owned by Jacquelyn S. Reed, as Trustee, from A-1, Agricultural District (up to 1 unit/5 acres) to RM -8, Multiple -Family Residential District (up to 8 units/acre). The purpose of the request is to secure the zoning necessary to develop the site, consistent with its comprehensive plan land use designation, at a greater residential density. On June 26, 1997, the Planning and Zoning Commission voted 5-1 to recommend that the Board of County Commissioners approve this request to rezone the subject property to RM -8. The subject property and properties to the north and west consist of agriculturally zoned wooded areas. A 100 foot wide canal right- of-way abuts the site's north boundary. West of the subject property is Paradise Park, Unit 3. That subdivision, which appears never to have been cleared, was platted prior to the existence of zoning regulations in the county and has not been developed. Thus, it contains no houses, or infrastructure such as roads and utility lines. East of the subject property, across 90th Avenue, is Paradise Park, Unit 2, which is zoned RS -6, Single -Family Residential District (up to 6 units/acre). Paradise Park, Unit 2 contains some infrastructure and houses. Abutting the subject property on the south is a wooded area zoned RM -8. The subject property and properties to the east, west, and south are designated M-1, Medium -Density Residential -1, on the county future land use map. The M-1 designation permits residential uses with densities up to 8 units/acre. Land to the north of the site is outside the county's urban service area and is designated AG -1, Agricultural -1 on the county future land use map. The AG -1 designation permits agricultural uses and residential uses with densities up to 1 unit/5 acres. The subject property consists primarily of pine flatwoods that have been invaded by several species of exotic/nuisance vegetation. Based on a cursory review, the site does not appear to contain jurisdictional wetlands. The northern fringe of the property, however, appears to be within a zone "A" flood hazard area. The zone "A" flood hazard area indicates that a minimum base flood elevation has not been determined for that area. Potable water lines Avenue. Centralized within a half mile of August 12, 1997 extend to the subject property along 90th sanitary sewer lines extend along SR 60 to the site. 36 The property abuts 90th Avenue which is classified as a collector road on the future roadway thoroughfare plan map. This segment of 90th Avenue is a two-lane unpaved road with approximately 65 feet of public road right-of-way. There are no plans to expand this segment of 90th Avenue. Road right-of-way for 26th Street presently does not extend west of 90th Avenue, and there are no plans to improve that segment of 26th Street in the future. The subject property is located within the boundaries of the SR 60 Corridor Plan Area. Therefore, multiple -family residential development on the site must meet special landscaping, architectural, roof design, signage, and color standards. In contrast, single-family residential development is exempt from SR 60 Corridor Plan requirements. In this section, an analysis of the reasonableness of the application will be presented. Specifically, this section will include: • an analysis of the request's impact on public facilities; • an analysis of the request's compatibility with the surrounding area; • an analysis of the request's consistency with the comprehensive plan; and • an analysis of the request.'s potential impact on environmental quality. This site is located within the county Urban Service Area, an area deemed suited for urban scale development. The Comprehensive -Plan establishes standards for: Transportation, Potable Water, Wastewater, Solid Waste, Drainage and Recreation (Future Land Use Policy 3.1). The adequate provision of these services is necessary to ensure the continued quality of life enjoyed by the community. The Comprehensive Plan and Land Development Regulations (LDRs) also require that new development be reviewed to ensure that the minimum acceptable standards for these services and facilities are maintained. Policy 3.2 of the Future Land Use Element states that no development shall be approved unless it is consistent with the concurrency management system component of the Capital Improvements Element. For rezoning requests, conditional concurrency review is required. Conditional concurrency review examines the available capacity of each facility with respect to a proposed project. Since rezoning requests are not projects, county regulations call for the concurrency review to be based upon the most intense use of the subject property based upon the requested zoning district. The site information used for the concurrency analysis is as follows: 1. Size of Area to be Rezoned: 117.5 acres 37 UOK 102 PAGE UU August 12, 1997 2. Existing Zoning Classification: 3. Proposed Zoning Classification: 4. Most Intense Use of Subject Property under Existing Zoning Classification: 5. Most Intense Use of Subject Property under Proposed Zoning Classification: Transportation BOOK 1V PAGE 261 A-1, Agricultural District (up to 1 unit/5 acres) RM -8, Multiple -Family Residential District (up to 8 units/acre) 3 single-family units 140 single-family units As part of the concurrency review process, the applicant has submitted a Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) . The county's Traffic Engineering Division has reviewed and approved that TIA. A TIA reports the number of peak hour/peak season/peak direction trips that would be generated by the most intense use of the subject property under the proposed zoning district, and assigns those trips to impacted roads. Impacted roads are defined in section 910.09(4)(b)3 of the county's LDRs as roadway segments which receive five percent (5%) or more of the project traffic or fifty (50) or more of the project trips, whichever is less. According to the TIA, the existing level of service ("D" or better) on impacted roadways would not be lowered by the traffic generated by development of 140 single-family units on the subject property. The table below identifies each of the impacted roadway segments associated with a 140 unit single-family residential development on the subject property. As indicated in this table, there is sufficient capacity in all of the segments to accommodate the projected traffic associated with the request. TRAFFIC CONCURRENCY DETERMINATION Impacted Road Segments (peak hour/peak season/peak direction) 38 August 12, 1997 Segment Roadway Capacity Seament Road From To LOS "D'_ 1210S I-95 N. County Line C.R. 512 2,700 1220S I-95 C.R. 512 S.R. 60 2,700 13355 U.S. 1 17th Street S.R. 60 2,270 1340N U.S. 1 S.R. 60 Royal Palm Place 2,300 1905E S.R. 60 W. County Line C.R. 512 280 1910E S.R. 60 C.R. 512 I-95 980 1915E S.R. 60 I-95 82nd Avenue 1,890 1915W S.R. 60 I-95 82nd Avenue 1,890 1920E S.R. 60 82nd Avenue 66th Avenue 2,270 1920W S.R. 60 82nd Avenue 66th Avenue 2,270 1925E S.R. 60 66th Avenue 58th Avenue 2,840 1925W S.R. 60 66th Avenue 58th Avenue 2,840 1930E S.R. 60 58th Avenue 43rd Avenue 2,840 1930W S.R. 60 58th Avenue 43rd Avenue 2,840 1935E S.R. 60 43rd Avenue 27th Avenue 2,840 1935W S.R. 60 43rd Avenue 27th Avenue 2,840 1940E S.R. 60 27th Avenue 20th Avenue 2,510 1940W S.R. 60 27th Avenue 20th Avenue 2,510 1945E S.R. 60 20th Avenue Old Dixie Hwy 2,328 1945W S.R. 60 20th Avenue Old Dixie Hwy 2,328 38 August 12, 1997 1950E S.R. 60 Old Dixie Hwy 10th Avenue 2,328 1950W S.R. 60 Old Dixie Hwy 10th Avenue 2,328 1955E S.R. 60 10th Avenue U.S. 1 2,328 1955W S.R. 60 10th Avenue U.S. 1 2,328 1960E S.R. 60 U.S. 1 I.R. Blvd 2,328 1960W S.R. 60 U.S. 1 I.R. Blvd 2,328 2710N 10th Avenue S.R. 60 Royal Palm Blvd. 760 2720S 10th Avenue Royal Palm Blvd 17th Street 760 2860N 20th Avenue 16th Street S.R. 60 1,890 28705 20th Avenue S.R. 60 Atlantic Blvd. 880 2930N 43rd Avenue 16th Street S.R. 60 880 2930S 43rd Avenue 16th Street S.R. 60 880 2935N 43rd Avenue S.R. 60 26th Street 880 29355 43rd Avenue S.R. 60 26th Street 880 3025N 58th Avenue 16th Street S.R. 60 1,890 30255 58th Avenue 16th Street S.R. 60 1,890 3030N 58th Avenue S.R. 60 41st Street 1,890 3030S 58th Avenue S.R. 60 41st Street 1,890 3120S 66th Avenue S.R. 60 26th Street 760 3130S 66th'Avenue 177 26th Street 41st Street 1,230 3140S 66th Avenue 41st Street 45th Street 760 3150S 66th Avenue 45th Street 65th Street 600 3160S 66th Avenue 65th Street 69th Street 600 3170S 66th Avenue 69th Street C.R. 510 600 3330N 82nd Avenue 12th Street S.R. 60 760 33305 82nd Avenue 12th Street S.R. 60 760 3340S 82nd Avenue S.R. 60 65th Street 600 Existina Demand Total Available Positive Roadway Existing Vested Segment Segment Project Concurrency Seament Volume Volume Demand Capacity Demand Determination 1210S 1197 8 1205 1495 9 Y 1220S 1227 33 1260 1440 9 Y 1335S 1315 326 1641 629 6 Y 1340N 643 185 828 1472 6 Y 1905E 231 14 245 35 5 Y 1910E 371 121 492 488 14 Y 1915E 925 631 1556 334 42 Y 1915W 1039 545 1584.. 306 78 Y 1920E 1009 809 1818 452 40 Y 1920W 1208 680 1880 382 57 Y 1925E 1170 1308 2478 362 38 Y 1925W 1288 1250 2538 302 46 Y 1930E 1116 1264 2380 460 32 Y 1930W 1209 1256 2465 375 36 Y 1935E 1074 821 1895 945 22 Y 1935W 1202 811 2013 827 26 Y 1940E 863 597 1460 1050 21 Y 1940W 859 583 1442 1068 19 Y 1945E 928 520 1448 880 20 Y 1945W 985 499 1484 844 12 Y 1950E 1037 409 1446 882 20 Y 1950W 789 392 1181 1147 12 Y 1955E 937 400 1337 991 20 Y 1955W 491 382 873 1455 12 Y 1960E 445 185 630 1698 14 Y 1960W 463 177 640 1688 1 Y 2710N 96 16 112 648 2 Y 27205 207 10 217 543 4 Y 2860N 212 44 256 1634 1 Y 2870S 136 10 146 734 7 Y 2930N 498 169 667 213 5 Y 29305 673 167 840 40 5 Y 2935N 380 108 488 392 5 Y 2935S 504 107 611 269 5 Y 3025N 510 548 1058 832 5 Y 30255 564 545 1109 781 4 Y 3030N 461 368 829 1061 5 Y 3030S 495 375 870 1020 2 Y CM August 12, 1997 WK�Q4W FACE 262 BOOK PAGE 263 Existina Demand Total Available Positive Roadway Existing Vested Segment Segment Project Concurrency Seament Volume Volume p mann Capacity Demand Determination 31205 169 89 258 502 11 Y 3130S 162 143 305 925 10 Y 3140S 242 63 305 455 10 Y 3150S 149 64 213 387 10 Y 3160S 143 59 202 398 10 Y 3170S 153 61 214 386 10 Y 3330N 171 81 252 508 6 Y 3330S 238 92 330 430 2 Y 3340S 44 76 120 480 3 Y - Water A 140 unit residential use on the subject property will have a water consumption rate of 140 Equivalent Residential units (ERU), or 35,000 gallons/day. This is based upon a level of service standard of 250 gallons/ERU/day. Development on the subject property will be serviced by the South County Water Plant which has a remaining capacity of approximately 1,900,000 gallons/day and can accommodate the additional demand generated by the most intense use allowed under the proposed zoning. - Wastewater A 140 unit residential use on the subject property will have a wastewater generation rate of 140 Equivalent Residential Units (ERU), or 35,000 gallons/day. This is based upon a level of service standard of 250 gallons/ERU/day. County wastewater lines currently extend to within one half mile of the site. The property will be serviced by the West County Wastewater Treatment Plant which has a remaining capacity of approximately 178,000 gallons/day and would be able to accommodate the additional demand generated by the most intense use allowed under the proposed zoning. Solid Waste Solid waste service includes pick-up by private operators and disposal at the county landfill. The county's adopted level of service standard for landfill capacity is 2.37 cubic yards/person/ year. With the county's average of approximately 2.3 persons/unit, a 140 unit residential development would be anticipated to house approximately 322 people (2.3 X 140). For the subject request to meet the county's adopted level of service standard of 2.37 cubic yards/person/year, the landfill must have enough capacity to accommodate approximately 764 (366 X 2.37) cubic yards/year. A review of the solid waste capacity for the active segment of the county landfill indicates the availability of more than 840,000 cubic yards. The active segment of the landfill has a 2 year capacity, and the landfill has expansion capacity beyond 2010. Based on the analysis, staff determined that the county landfill can accommodate the additional solid waste generated by the site under the proposed zoning district. - Drainage All developments are reviewed for compliance with regulations which require on-site retention, floodplain storage and minimum finished floor addition, development proposals must meet requirements of the county Stormwater Management 40 August 12, 1997 county stormwater preservation of elevations. In the discharge Ordinance. The subject property is located within the M-1 Drainage Basin and the Indian River Farms Water Control District (IRFWCD). Since the site is located within the IRFWCD, development on the property will be prohibited from discharging any runoff in excess of two inches in a 24 hour period, which is the approved IRFWCD discharge rate. Additionally, because the northern fringe of the property lies within a floodplain, the minimum floor elevation level of service standard applies to that area. Consistent with Drainage Policy 1.2, "all new buildings shall have the lowest habitable floor elevation no lower than six inches above the elevation of the 100 - year flood elevation as shown on the Federal Emergency Management Agency's Flood Insurance Rate Map, or as defined in a more detailed study report." Since the northern fringe of the subject property lies within Flood Zone A, which is a special flood hazard area located within the 100 -year floodplain, any development within that area must have a minimum finished floor elevation of no less than 23.6 feet above mean sea level, or 18 inches above the crown of the adjacent roadway, whichever is higher. Besides the minimum elevation requirement, on-site retention and discharge standards also apply to this request. With the most intense use of this site under the proposed zoning, the maximum area of impervious surface will be approximately 533,610 square feet, or 12.25 acres. The maximum runoff volume, based on that amount of impervious surface and the 25 year/24 hour design storm, and given the IRFWCD two inch discharge requirement, will be approximately 528,095 cubic feet. In order to maintain the county's adopted level of service, the applicant will be required to retain approximately 400,843 cubic feet of runoff on-site. Considering the soils characteristic of the subject property, staff estimates that the pre -development runoff rate is 84 cubic feet/second. Based upon staff's analysis, the drainage level of service standards will be met by limiting off-site discharge to the IRFWCD's maximum discharge rate of two inches in 24 hours, and requiring retention of 400,843 cubic feet of runoff for the most intense use of the property. As with all development, a more detailed review will be conducted during the development approval process. - Recreation A review of county recreation facilities and the projected demand that would result from the most intense development that could occur on the property under the proposed zoning classification indicates that the adopted levels of service would be maintained. The table below illustrates the additional park demand associated with the proposed development of the property and the existing surplus acreage by park type. Park Type Urban District Community (south) Beach River LOS (Acres per 1000 population) 5.0 1.25 1.5 1.5 Project Demand Surplus 1.61 161.397 0.40 4.487 0.48 58.822 0.48 19.819 Based upon the analysis conducted, staff has determined that all concurrency -mandated facilities, including drainage, roads, solid waste, recreation, water, and wastewater have adequate capacity to accommodate the most intense use of the subject property under the proposed zoning. Therefore, the concurrency test has been satisfied for the subject request. 41 660K 102 PAGE 264 August 12, 1997 BQOK 102 PAGE 265 Consistency with Comnrehens ve Plan Rezoning requests are reviewed for consistency with all policies of the comprehensive plan. Rezoning requests must also be consistent with the overall designation of land uses as depicted on the Future Land Use Map. These include agricultural, residential, recreational, conservation, and commercial and industrial land uses and their densities. Commercial and industrial land uses are located in nodes throughout the unincorporated areas of Indian River County. The goals, objectives and policies are the most important parts of the comprehensive plan. Policies are statements in the plan which identify the actions which the county will take in order to direct the community's development. As courses of action committed to by the county, policies provide the basis for all county land development related decisions. While all comprehensive plan policies are important, some have more applicability than others in reviewing rezoning requests. Of particular applicability for this request are the following policies and objectives. - Future Land Use Element Objective 1 Future Land Use Element Objective 1 states that the county will have a compact land use pattern which reduces urban sprawl. By increasing the density of land currently within the urban service area, as opposed to expanding the urban service area, the county can efficiently support growth without creating urban sprawl or sacrificing compactness. For these reasons, the request is consistent with Future Land Use Element Objective 1. - Future Land Use Element Policies 1.13 and 1.14 Future Land Use Element Policy 1.14 states that the M-1, Medium - Density Residential -1, land use designation is intended for residential uses with densities up to 8 units/acre. In addition, Future Land Use Element Policy 1.13 states that these residential uses must be located within the urban service area. Since the subject property is located within an area designated as M-1 on the county's future land use plan map and is located within the county's urban service area, and the proposed zoning district would permit residential uses no greater than the 8 units/acre permitted by the M-1 designation, the proposed request is consistent with Policies 1.13 and 1.14. - Future Land Use Element Policy 2.5 Future Land Use Element Policy 2.5 states that the county will encourage and direct growth into the urban service area. Since the proposed rezoning would allow and encourage more development on the subject property, and the subject property is within the urban service area, the request implements Future Land Use Element Policy 2.5. Future Land Use Element Objective 4 Future Land Use Element Objective 4 states that Indian River County will reduce the number and length of trips by implementing a land use pattern which places employment centers near residential areas. The subject property is located near the SR 60 and I-95 commercial/industrial node. As that node continues to develop, demand for nearby multiple -family housing will be generated. By accommodating that demand for multiple -family housing, the subject request implements Future Land Use Element Objective 4. 42 August 12, 1997 - Future Land Use Element Objective 5 and Policy 5.3 Future Land Use Element Objective 5 and Policy 5.3 encourage varied densities and development patterns to accommodate a diversity of lifestyles. Most of the residentially designated land near the subject property is platted for single-family development. By permitting additional development options on the subject property, the subject request implements Future Land Use Element Objective 5 and Policy 5.3. - Economic Development Element Policies 8.1 and 8.5 Economic Development Element Policies 8.1 and 8.5 address the use of incentives, including increased densities, to reduce the cost per housing unit and to encourage the provision of affordable housing. By allowing increased density on the subject property, the request would implement Economic Development Element Policies 8.1 and B.S. - Mass Transit Element Policy 1.2 Mass Transit Element Policy 1.2 states that the county will provide higher densities along major transportation corridors in order to facilitate future mass transit provision. Since the request is for the county's second highest density and the subject property is located within one half of a mile from a major transportation corridor, the request implements Mass Transit Element Policy 1.2. While the referenced policies and objectives are particularly applicable to this request, other comprehensive plan policies and objectives also have relevance. For that reason, staff evaluated the subject request for consistency with all plan policies and objectives. Based upon that analysis, staff determined that the request is consistent with the comprehensive plan. Staff's position is that multiple -family residential development is appropriate for the site and that such development would be compatible with surrounding land uses. Since land abutting the subject property's south boundary is zoned RM -8, the request is for the continuation of an existinq zoning pattern. More importantly, because it is located near the SR 60/I-95 commercial/ industrial node, the subject property is particularly well suited to meet the demand for multiple -family housing generated by development within that node. In effect, the proposed rezoning would increase the opportunity for people to live near their place of employment. Although a single-family subdivision is located to the east of the subject property, provisions of the SR 60 Corridor Plan ensure that development of a multiple -family residential project on the subject property will be adequately buffered from the nearby single-family subdivision. In addition to canopy trees, understory trees, a berm, and a continuous hedge, the required buffer along 901h Avenue must contain a six foot high opaque feature. Separation distance is another factor that works to mitigate potential impacts. LDR mandated front setbacks of 25 feet in the RM -8 district and 20 feet in the RS -6 district, combined with the 65 feet of public road right-of-way for 90th Avenue, ensure that there will be at least 110 feet between buildings in the adjoining districts. 43 August August 12,1997 PAGE 06 B©OK 102 PuE, 267 For these reasons, staff feels that development under the requested RM -8 zoning district would not result in incompatibilities with the surrounding area. The proposed rezoning from A-1 to RM -8 would not result in an increase in potential adverse environmental impacts associated with site development. Since agricultural use is largely exempt from county permitting, the county, in fact, has more opportunity to regulate impacts associated with residential development than impacts associated with agricultural use. Residential development of the property will be subject to a number of environmental requirements, including land clearing and tree removal permits. The county's native upland plant community set- aside requirement may apply to portions of the subject property. Prior to residential development of the site, the applicant will be required to complete an environmental survey to determine whether any jurisdictional wetlands exist on the site. That survey will have to be approved by the county's environmental planning staff. Any jurisdictional wetlands on the parcel are protected by federal, state, and county regulations. For these reasons, no significant adverse environmental impacts associated with this request are anticipated. The requested zoning is compatible with the surrounding area, consistent with the comprehensive plan, meets all concurrency criteria, and will have no negative impacts on environmental quality. The subject property is located in an area deemed suited for medium -density residential uses and meets all applicable rezoning criteria. For these reasons, staff supports the request. Based on the analysis, staff and the Planning and Zoning Commission recommend that the Board of County Commissioners approve this request to rezone the subject property from A-1 to RM -8. ATTACEMUMS 1. Rezoning Application 2. Location Map 3. Approved minutes of Commission meeting. 4. Ordinance August 12, 1997 the June 26, 1997 Planning and Zoning 44 A ..- -4 C D W 1 �O r+ N � n J A -4 9e TIf10A90TH AVE TIQ .� r7 7' 11 B� N-il UNIT l 4 LATERAL .D" StBASTIAN *MR 1 1 ..- -4 D �O .p V1 -4 9e TIf10A90TH AVE TIQ .� r7 7' 11 B� N-il UNIT l 4 LATERAL .D" StBASTIAN *MR 1 1 BOOK 102 PAGE269. The Chairman opened the public hearing and asked if anyone wished to be heard in this matter. Ira Hatch, representing the landowner, asked that staff's recommendation and the traffic study be made part of the record. He stated that the rezoning request conforms with the County's requirements under the Comprehensive Land Use Plan and asked that the request for rezoning be granted. (CLERK'S NOTE: A COPY OF THE TRAFFIC STUDY HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE BACKUP OF THIS MEETING IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE It was determined that no one else wished to be heard and the Chairman closed the public hearing. In response to Commissioner Adams' concern, Director Keating explained the "stepping down" which has occurred in the area of the requested rezoning. Director Keating explained the characteristics that made staff look favorably at this, that on the west side of 90th Avenue, the property goes generally to I-95 and there are no houses on the west side. There are scattered houses on the east side in the Paradise Park Subdivision, but the subdivision is not substantially built out, and staff feels that 90th Avenue is a good dividing line for the multi -family and the single family. In the area, a little to the south of the subject property, the land use transitions into commercial. Staff feels this is a good stepping down. Chairman Eggert was supportive of the rezoning based on the economics and felt it was an appropriate zoning. Commissioner Macht did not agree that economics should drive the Comprehensive Plan philosophy. August 12, 1997 MOTION WAS MADE by Commissioner Tippin, SECONDED BY Commissioner Ginn, to approve staff's recommendation. Under discussion, Commissioner Tippin offered a little trivia about Paradise Park. When it was developed in the early 1950's, it was advertised by the developers in northern newspapers as being "within walking distance of the beach." Commissioner Ginn pointed out that there is no infrastructure to the west of the property. She did not favor the rezoning, but would support it because it was in compliance with the Comprehensive Plan and policies and was also approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission. Her only concern would be that a developer might come in with a plan for affordable housing and it would be bumped up to 10 units per acre. She was not in favor of that and expected, if that was to occur, it would be brought to the Board. Director Keating explained that would be considered a Planned Development and subject to the Board's approval. THE CHAIRMAN CALLED THE QUESTION and the motion carried unanimously. (Ordinance No. 97-022 adopted) ORDINANCE NO. 97-22 AN ORDINANCE OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE AND THE ACCOMPANYING ZONING MAP FROM A-1 TO RM -8, FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF 90TH AVENUE AND 26TH STREET, AND DESCRIBED HEREIN, AND PROVIDING FOR EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission, sitting as the local planning agency on such matters, has held a public hearing and subsequently made a recommendation regarding this rezoning request; and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida, did publish its Notice of Intent to rezone the hereinafter described property; and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners has determined that this rezoning is in conformance with the Comprehensive Plan of Indian River County; and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners has held a public hearing pursuant to this rezoning request, at which parties in interedt and citizens were heard; BOOK 102 PAGE 2 i u August 12, 1997 800K 102 PAGE 271 ORDINANCE NO. 97-22 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED, by the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida, that the zoning of the following described property situated in Indian River County, Florida, to -wit: TRACT 1 (LESS CANAL AND LESS THE SOUTH 20 ACRES) OF SECTION 3, TOWNSHIP 33 SOUTH, RANGE 38 EAST, ACCORDING TO THE LAST GENERAL PLAT OF LANDS OF THE INDIAN RIVER COMPANY, FILED AT PLAT BOOK 2, PAGE .25, PUBLIC RECORDS OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORDIA, SAID LAND NOW LYING AND BEING IN INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA. Be changed from A-1 to RM -8. All with the meaning and intent and as set forth and described in said Land Development Regulations. This ordinance shall become effective upon filing with the Department of State. Approved and adopted by the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida, on this 12th day of August, 1997. This ordinance was advertised in the Vero Beach Press -Journal on the 30th -day of July, 1997 for a public hearing to be held on the 12th day of August, 1997 at which time it was moved for adoption by Commissioner Tippin , seconded by Commissioner Ginn , and adopted by the following vote: Chairman Carolyn K. Eggert Ave Vice -Chairman John W. Tippin Ave Commissioner Fran B. Adams Ave Commissioner Caroline D. Ginn _gyp Commissioner Kenneth R. Macht AjP BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY BY: ATT This ordinance was filed with the Department of State on the following date: Auaust 21_ 1997 u\v\j\Jzeed.osd August 12, 1997 m®an Rirw Ca Approved Da Admin 1 C Legal C(R Buaget DepL Risk Mgr M in 9.A.2. PUBLIC HEARING - AMENDING ZONING ORDINANCE AND MAP FROM CH TO CG - 9400 BLOCK ON NORTH SIDE OF SR - 60, WEST OF 1-95 (0.82+/- ACRES) - PATRICIA ROMINE g�ia�g7 � PRESS -JOURNAL Published Daily Vero Beach, Indian River County, Florida COUNTY OF INDIAN RIVER: STATE OF FLORIDA oath sey Before the the Isis Pre of � Preas loemal a personally eppesred Darts K. Now who on in Irhdian River County. Fbrida; that the attached Dopy Wit, at Vero Beach a \ -ct C.C_� m the matter ot�.Qk-LL S In the Cast. was pub. 6sled in said rw"Paper m the issues ofy�k Affiant further says flat the said Press- lohunal Is a newspaper pubbtW at Vero Beach. in said IrKhan River co *wDusry Published RiverFionft and County, the said hhas es heretofore been entered as second class mail matter at the post offer Vero Beach. �Ir� Rhow Couounty, Florida, fad a perrodr ard�affYEW iam fu t Pr 9 the Hret publication of the attached copy of a corporofy= firm ation ther c that he toss r refs paid nor edvertt to discomt, rebate, commission a refund for tfhethis PubUcatron I n said newspaper. before me rhe * Mr WMMm [►!INS wlwwot.t�l :o�:, toMM.sD.CCd1t09t ? . (SEAL) August 12, 1997 My Commi Comm. No Personally AIS it Florida 2 n. 01, 2001 Of Producedln r Type 0 I Produoea NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING The Board of County Commission- ers of Indian River County, Florida, will consider the adoption of a county ordinance rezoning land from: CH, Heavy Commercial Dis- trict to CG, General Commercial District. The subject pro Is owned by Patricia Romine. The subject property is located in the 9400 block on the north side of SR 60, wheat of 1-95, and contains approximately 0.82 acres. The sub- iect property lies in the northwest '/. section of Section 3, Township 33S, Range 38E, lying and being in Indian River County, Florida. 49 A public hearing at which parties in interest and citizens shall hove an opportunity to be heard, will be held by the Board of County Com- missioners of Indian River County, Florida, in the County Commission Chambers of the County Adminis- tration Building, located at 1840 25th Street; Vero Beach, Florida on Tuesday, August 12, 1997, at 9:05 a.m. The proposed -ordinance to rezone the subject property is entitled: AN ORDINANCE OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE AND THE ACCOM- PANYING ZONING MAP FROM CH TO CG, FOR PROPERTY LOCATED IN THE 9400 BLOCK ON THE NORTH SIDE OF SR 60, WEST OF 1-95, AND DESCRIBED HEREIN, AND PROVIDING FOR EFFECTIVE DATE. The proposed ordinance may be inspected by the public during reg- ular business hours at the Office of the Clerk to the Board of County Commissioners, 1840' 25th Street, Vero Beach, Florida. For more information, contact John Wachtel at 567-8000, extension 247. The Board of County Commission- ers may adopt another zoning dis- trict, other than the district request- ed, provided N is within the some general use category. Anyone who may wish to appeal any decision which may be made at this meeting will need to ensure that a verbatim record of the pro- ceedings is made, .which includes testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is based. Anyone who needs a special accommodation for this meeting must contact the county's Ameri- cans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Coordinator at 567.8000 exten- sion 223 at least 48 hours in advance of meeting. Indian River County Board of County Commissioners BY: -s- Carolyn K. Eggert, Chairman July 30, 1997 1130411 r BOOR 10MUM- Bm 102 PAGE 2` 3 Community Development Director Robert M. Keating reviewed a Memorandum dated July 22, 1997: TO: James E. Chandler County Adminsitrator ;oblertM. i ENT BEAD CONCURRENCE Keatin , Al Community Development irector THROUGH: Sasan Rohani, AICP S - W, Chief, Long -Range Planning FROM: John Wachtel _ Senior Pl er, Long -Range Planning DATE: July 22, 1997 RE: Patricia Romines's Request to Rezone Approximately 0.82 Acres From CH to CG (RZON 97-06-0093) It is requested that the data herein presented be given formal consideration by the Board of County Commissioners at its regular meeting of August 12, 1997. i. L*#;kwkfldr.�P • "• This is a request to rezone approximately 0.82 acres from CH, Heavy Commercial District, to CG, General Commercial District. The subject property is located on the north side of SR 60, between I- 95 and 98th Avenue (across from the Horizon Outlet Mall). The purpose of this request is to secure the necessary zoning to permit a convenience store on the subject property. On July 9, 1997, the Planning and Zoning Commission voted 4-0 to recommend that the Board of County Commissioners approve this request to rezone the subject property to CG. While the subject property is zoned CH, Heavy Commercial District, properties abutting it on all sides are zoned CG, General Commercial District. The site contains one vacant 1 -story commercial building. The extreme southeastern portion of the site, as well as properties abutting the site on the east, west, and north, are heavily wooded areas. To the south, across SR 60, land west of 94th Drive is also heavily wooded. Properties east of 94th Drive contain the Horizon Outlet Mall and several other commercial buildings. 50 August 12, 1997 Future Land Use Pattern The subject property and abutting properties on all sides are designated C/I, Commercial/Industrial, on the future land use map. The C/I designation permits various commercial and industrial zoning districts. Environment More than 90k of the site has been cleared for development. The remaining land contains scrubby flatwoods. A cursory review of aerial photographs indicates that the site does not contain any wetland areas. According to Flood Insurance Rating Maps, the northern portion of the subject property is within a Flood Zone "A", which indicates an area for which the base flood elevation has not yet been determined. The rest of the site is not in a flood hazard area. The site is within the Urban Service Area of the county. Water lines extend to the site from the South County Reverse Osmosis Plant. Wastewater lines from the West Regional Wastewater Treatment Plant also extend to the site. The subject property abuts SR 60. Classified as an urban principal arterial roadway on the future roadway thoroughfare plan map, this segment of SR 60 is a four -lane divided road with approximately 160 feet of public road right-of-way. No expansion of this segment of SR 60 is currently programmed. West of 100th Avenue, however, SR 60 is programmed for expansion to four lanes by 2000. In terms of permitted uses, there are both similarities and differences between the existing CH district and the proposed CG district. As a transitional type of zoning district having more intense uses than general commercial districts and less intense uses than industrial districts, the CH district is oriented to uses such as warehouses, contractor trades, and repair establishments. In contrast, the CG district is intended for retail, office, and service commercial development. The differences between the districts are best illustrated by their purpose statements. These purpose statements, found in the county's land development regulations, are as follows: • CH, Heavy Commercial District. The CH, Heavy Commercial, district is intended to provide areas for establishments engaging in wholesale trade, major repair services and restricted light manufacturing activities. The CH district is further intended to provide support services necessary for the development of commercial and industrial uses allowed within other non-residential zoning districts. • CG, General Commercial District. The CG, General Commercial, district is intended to provide areas for the development of general retail sales and selected service activities. The CG district is not intended to provide for heavy commercial activities, such as commercial service uses, heavy repair services nor industrial uses. 51 August 12, 1997 BOOK .1.04 FACE 2 1 4 690K 102 PAGE 275 - The subject property is located within the boundaries of the SR 60 Corridor Plan Area. Therefore, commercial development on the site must meet special use, landscaping, architectural, roof design, signage, and color standards. This section presents an analysis of the reasonableness of the application. Specifically, this section will include: • an analysis of the request's impact on public facilities; • an analysis of the request's compatibility with the surrounding area; • an analysis of the request's consistency with the comprehensive plan; and • an analysis of the request's potential impact on environmental quality. This site is located within the county Urban Service Area, an area deemed suited for urban scale development. The comprehensive plan establishes standards for: Transportation, Potable Water, Wastewater, Solid Waste, Drainage and Recreation (Future Land Use Policy 3.1). The adequate provision of these services is necessary to ensure the continued quality of life enjoyed by the community. The comprehensive plan also requires that new development be reviewed to ensure that the minimum acceptable standards for these services and facilities are maintained. Policy 3.2 of the Future Land Use Element states that no development shall be approved unless it is consistent with the concurrency management system component of the Capital Improvements Element. For rezoning requests, conditional concurrency review is required. Conditional concurrency review examines the available capacity of each facility with respect to a proposed project. Since rezoning requests are not projects, county regulations call for the concurrency review to be based upon the most intense use of the subject property based upon the requested zoning district. For commercial rezoning requests, the most intense use (according to the county's land development regulations) is retail commercial with 10,000 square feet of gross floor area per acre of land proposed for rezoning. The site information used for the concurrency analysis is as follows: 1. Size of Area to be Rezoned: 10.82 acres 2. Land Use Designation: C/I, Commercial/Industrial 3. Existing Zoning Classification: CH, Heavy Commercial 4. Proposed Zoning Classification: CG, General Commercial S. Most Intense Use under Existing Zoning Classification: 18,200 sq. ft. of Retail Commercial (Shopping Center in the Sth Edition ITE Manual). 52 August 12, 1997 W 6. Most Intense Use under Proposed Zoning Classification: ±8,200 sq. ft. of Retail Commercial (Shopping Center in the 5th Edition ITE Manual). As per section 910.07(2) of the Concurrency Management Chapter of the County's Land Development Regulations, projects which do not increase density or intensity of use are exempt from concurrency requirements. This rezoning request is exempt from concurrency review because the requested zoning would not increase the use intensity of the site. By changing the zoning of the subject property from CH to CG, some commercial uses not currently allowed would be permitted on the site. However, because the most intense use of the property would be the same with either zoning district, changing the property's zoning from CH to CG would not create additional impacts on any concurrency facilities. In this case, a detailed concurrency analysis will be done in conjunction with site development. That concurrency analysis will address facility service levels and demand. Staff's position is that granting the subject request would decrease the likelihood of incompatibilities associated with site development. Since the subject property is surrounded by CG zoned land, the request is for a continuation of an existing zoning district pattern. Located near major transportation facilities and proximate to residentially designated land, general commercial type development is logical on the subject property and within the subject commercial/industrial node. In fact, the predominant zoning within the subject node is CG, particularly along SR 60 and between 82°d Avenue and 98th Avenue. For these reasons, the proposed rezoning is anticipated to result in development that is compatible with surrounding property. Rezoning requests are reviewed for consistency with all policies of the comprehensive plan. Rezonings must also be consistent with the overall designation of land uses as depicted on the Future Land Use Map, which include agriculture, residential, recreation, conservation, and commercial and industrial land uses and their densities. Commercial and industrial land uses are located in nodes throughout the unincorporated areas of Indian River County. The goals, objectives and policies are the most important parts of the comprehensive plan. Policies are statements in the plan which identify the actions which the county will take in order to direct the community's development. As courses of action committed to by the county, policies provide the basis for all county land development decisions. While all comprehensive plan policies are important, some have more applicability than others in reviewing rezoning requests. Of particular applicability for this request is Future Land Use Element Policy 1.15. 53 August 12, 1997 BOOK 104, PAGE 2 i 6 BOOK 102 PAGE f.f"7 - Future Land Use Element Policy 1.15 Future Land Use Element Policy 1.15 states that the commercial land use designation is intended for uses such as retail and wholesale trade, offices, business and personal services, residential treatment centers, limited residential uses, and other similar type uses. In addition, that policy states that all commercial uses must be located within an existing or future urban service area. Since the subject property is located within a commercial/ industrial node within the county's urban service area, the request is consistent with Future Land Use Element Policy 1.15. While the referenced policy is particularly applicable to this request, other comprehensive plan policies and objectives also have relevance. For that reason, staff evaluated the subject request for consistency with all plan policies and objectives. Based upon that analysis, staff determined that the request is consistent with the comprehensive plan. Staff's position is that, since environmental protection regulations are the same under both the existing CH and the requested CG zoning districts, the requested zoning change will not negatively impact the environmental quality of this site. In this case, because commercial sites of less than five acres are exempt, the county's 10-15% native upland plant community set-aside requirement would not apply to development on the site. If an environmental survey determines that the site contains jurisdictional wetlands, county, state, and federal wetlands protection regulations would apply. The requested zoning is compatible with the surrounding area, consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies of the comprehensive plan, and meets all applicable concurrency criteria. The subject property is located in an area deemed suitable for general commercial uses. The request meets all applicable criteria. For those reasons, staff supports the request. Based on the analysis, staff and the Planning and Zoning Commission recommend that the Board of County Commissioners approve this request to rezone the subject property from CH to CG. 1. Rezoning Application 2. Location Map 3. Approved minutes of Commission meeting. 4. Ordinance August 12, 1997 the July 10, 1997 Planning and Zoning 54 L —A The Chairman opened the public hearing and asked if anyone wished to be heard in this matter. There being none, she closed the public hearing. ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED BY Commissioner Macht, the Board unanimously adopted Ordinance No. 97-023 amending the Zoning Ordinance and the accompanying Zoning Map from CH to CG for the property located in the 9400 block on the north side of SR -60, west of I-95, as recommended by staff. ORDINANCE NO. 97- 23 AN ORDINANCE OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE AND THE ACCOMPANYING ZONING MAP FROM CH TO CG, FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED IN THE 9400 BLOCK ON THE NORTH SIDE OF SR 60, WEST OF I-95, AND DESCRIBED HEREIN, AND PROVIDING FOR EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission, sitting as the local planning agency on such matters, has held a public hearing and subsequently made a recommendation regarding this rezoning request; and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida, did publish its Notice of Intent to rezone the hereinafter described property; and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners has determined that this rezoning is in conformance with the Comprehensive Plan of Indian River County; and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners has held a public hearing pursuant to this rezoning request, at which parties in interest and citizens were heard; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED, by the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida, that the zoning of the following described property situated in Indian River County, Florida, to -wit: A PORTION OF LOTS C-12, C-13, C-14 AND C-15 OF VERO TROPICAL GARDENS UNIT 2 AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 6, PAGE 64, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: 55 August 12, 1997 HOK PAGE v BOOK 102 PAGE 2, 79 ORDINANCE NO. 97-23 COMMENCE AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE CENTERLINE OF SURVEY FOR INTERSTATE HIGHWAY 95 AND THE CENTERLINE OF STATE ROAD 60, AS SHOWN ON STATE JOB #88051-2403 RIGHT-OF-WAY MAP, SHEET 8 OF 11, THENCE RUN NORTH 890 16' 32" WEST ALONG THE CENTERLINE OF STATE ROAD 60, A DISTANCE OF 1600.00 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE RUN NORTH 000 43' 28" EAST AT RIGHT ANGLES TO THE CENTERLINE OF STATE ROAD 60, A DISTANCE OF 160.00 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF STATE ROAD 60, SAID POINT BEING THE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THE TRACT OF LAND HERINAFTER LEGALLY DESCRIBED AND THE END OF THE LIMITED ACCESS RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF INTERSTATE HIGHWAY 95, THENCE RUN NORTH 890 16' 32" WEST ALONG THE NORTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF STATE ROAD 60, A DISTANCE OF 260.00 FEET TO A POINT, THENCE RUN NORTH 000 43' 20" EAST AT RIGHT ANGLES TO THE NORTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF STATE ROAD 60, A DISTANCE OF 165.00 FEET TO A POINT, THENCE RUN SOUTH 890 16' 32" EAST PARALLEL TO THE NORTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF STATE ROAD -60 A DISTANCE OF 200.00 FEET TO A POINT, THEN RUN SOUTH 000 43' 26" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 117.00 FEET TO A POINT, THENCE RUN SOUTH 890 16' 32" EAST PARALLEL TO NORTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF STATE ROAD 60, A DISTANCE OF 60.00 FEET TO A POINT, THENCE RUN SOUTH 000 43' 28" WEST A DISTANCE OF 48.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. Be changed from CH to CG. All with the meaning and intent and as set forth and described in said Land Development Regulations. This ordinance shall become effective upon filing with the Department of State. Approved and adopted by the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida, on this 12th day of August, 1997. This ordinance was advertised in the Vero Beach Press -Journal on the 30th day of July, 1997 for a public hearing to be held on the 12th day of August, 1997 at which time it was moved for adoption by Commissioner Adams , seconded by Commissioner Macht and adopted by the following vote: Chairman Carolyn K. Eggert Aye Vice -Chairman John W. Tippin Aye Commissioner Fran B. Adams Commissioner Caroline D. Ginn At Commissioner Kenneth R. Macht Aya BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY BY: Z�� 244e' Carol K. EggptDY, Chairman This ordinance was filed with the .Department of State on the following date: Auclus` 91., 1997 u\v\j\ROMINE.ord August 12, 1997 Indm five Gn Approved Oa e Admin CP Q Legal Budget , Dept. '� ni5h Mq� i t 56 9.A.3. PUBLIC HEARING - REQUEST FOR CONCEPTUAL SPECIAL EXCEPTION APPROVAL TO EXPAND THE EXISTING ST. EDWARDS UPPER SCHOOL CAMPUS PRESS -JOURNAL Published Daily Vero Beach, Indian River County, Florida COUNTY OF INDIAN RIVER: STATE OF FLORIDA Before the undersigned auttmrihr ply appeared Darryl K. Hides who an oath says that he is Present of the Press -Journal, a daily newspaper published at Vero Beach in Indian River County, Florida; that the attached COPY of advertisement, being In the matterof In the Court, was pub - fished In said newspaper In the Issues Affiant further says that the said Press -Journal is a newspaper published at Vero Beach, in sold Indian River ed Counin ty, Florida, 'an River County. Florida, each daily and hes enterer secobow nd d published second pass mail matter at the post office in Vero Beach, in said Indian River County. Florida. for a period of one year next pry the ffrsst publication of the attached copy of advertisement: and person, firm or corporation any adiscount, rebattee. commission or refund ys that he has neither dfor the purpose Ofnor prorrused yseaoing this ad+:+r. ht for publication in said newspaper. ibed befoe me Uus--.-- day D. t .• xv J* ILZ • ran [orualsswe Etyn�s : C.- * ` tuluur ot.2oot � * t c [OttY Nil. ([611092 KIMSERL NNE BLAIS a 9' Notary Public. State of Flonda .`9�, •. My Commission Exp.. Jan. n1.2001 'Ozii stA �;;' Pers nm.a y KnowntQp2 u er Produced IQ ' Type Of ID Produoad _ NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Notice of hearing to consider the granting of special exception use appon of St. Edward's proval for an operty is presently owned Upper ned by St. Edward's Scool, IInc al ool. The subiect prrand located in Section 21, Township 33 and Range 40. See the above map for the location. A public hearing at which parties in interest and citizens shall have an opportunity to be heard, will be held by the Board of County Commis- sioners of Indian River County, Florida, in the County Commission Cham- bers of the County Administration Building, located of 1840 25th Street, Vero Beach, Florida on Tuesday, August 12, 1997 at 9:05 a.m. Please direct planning-reloted questions to the current development plan- ning section at 567-8000, ext. 242. Anyone who may wish to appeal any decision which may be made at this meeting will need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceed- ings is made, which includes testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is based. ANYONE WHO NEEDS A SPECIAL ACCOMMODATION FOR THIS MEETING MUST CONTACT THE COUNTY'S AMERICANS WITH DIS- ABILITIES ACT (ADA) COORDINATOR AT 567-8000 EXT 223 AT LEAST 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE OF THE MEETING. INDIAN RIVER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS BY: -s- Carolyn K. Eggert, Chairman 1130413r July 30,1997 Planning Director Stan Boling reviewed a Memorandum dated July 28, 1997 with the aid of a map of the area on the ELMO: 57 August 12, 1997 B®OK 102 PAGE tMu BOOK 102 PAGE 281 TO: James E. Chandler County Administrator D ON HEAD CONCURRENCE: obert . Keating, P Community Development D"m7 .67, THROUGH: Stan Boling, AICP Planning Director FROM: John W. McCoy, AICP :: lA Senior Planner, Current Development DATE: July 28, 1997 SUBJECT: St. Edwards School Inc.'s Request for Conceptual Special Exception Approval to Expand the Existing St. Edwards Upper School Campus It is requested that the data herein presented be given formal consideration by the Board of County Commissioners at its regular meeting of August 12, 1997. BACKGROUND: Dow, Howell, Gilmore and Associates, Inc. and Masteller & Moler, Inc. have submitted applications for conceptual special exception and major site plan approval on behalf of St. Edwards School Inc. to expand the existing St. Edwards Upper School campus. The school is located at 1895 St. Edwards Drive. Since the subject property is zoned RS -3 and the facilities will be expanded by more than 10%, the request requires special exception use approval. The expansion is to be constructed in a single phase, over the next 5 years. In 1994, the Board of County Commissioners approved a special exception use request and conceptual site plan to expand the high school building area by 34,700 square feet. The 1994 plan located most of the new building improvements close to the north property line on lots that St. Edwards acquired from Sandpointe West. A site plan for Phase I improvements (stormwater and landscaping) was approved and constructed. The new plan supersedes the previous proposal of adding 34,700 square feet, and instead proposes an addition of 99,200 square feet of building area. Facilities for a 6th grade are included in the new proposal which will result in an overall enrollment increase from 375 students to 540 students. Thus, the resulting upper school campus will include a middle school and a high school. All of the newly proposed building improvements have been shifted to the southeast, while an expanded parking lot has been shifted to the north. The proposed improvements include an administration center, auditorium, music and art center, middle school, maintenance facility, athletic support building, and storage facility. 58 August 12, 1997 At its July 24, 1997 meeting, the Planning and Zoning Commission voted unanimously (6-0) to recommend conceptual special exception use approval with the condition recommended by staff. That same condition is included in staffis recommendation found at the end of this report. Also, the Planning and Zoning Commission approved an accompanying major site plan application subject to the Board of County Commissioners action on the special exception application. While no additional conditions were proposed, there was some discussion at the public hearing regarding outdoor lighting. That issue is addressed in this report. ANALYSIS: 1. Gross Site Area: 25.44 acres (existing, total upper school campus) 2. Zoning Classification: RS -3, Residential Single Family District (up to 3 units per acre) 3. Land Use Designation: L-1, Low Density 1 (up to 3 units per acre) 4. Phasing: The project is to be constructed in one continuous construction phase over a 5 year timeframe. 5. Building Area: Existing: 57,695 sq. ft. Proposed: 99,200 sq. ft. Total: 156,895 sq. ft. 6. Total Impervious Area: Existing: 183,010 sq. ft. Pro on sed: 120,799 sq. ft. Total: 303,809 sq. ft. 7. Open Space: Required: 40.0% Provided: 72.6% (at build -out) 8. Traffic Circulation: A traffic impact statement has been reviewed and approved by the traffic engineering division. The approved statement indicates that no off-site traffic related improvements are required, and none are proposed. The existing overall traffic circulation plan will be modified slightly. The existing on-site main access driveway will continue to provide access to SR A -1-A, but will be modified to 3 lanes with one inbound lane and two outbound lanes providing for right and left turn departures. Several rows of additional parking are proposed north of the existing parking lot, and will be accessed internally. An existing maintenance driveway at the southeast comer of the site will be expanded to serve as a separate, limited use parking lot for the middle school and maintenance facility. This driveway will be used for staff only, all buses, students and student drop-off traffic will use the existing north driveway. The proposed traffic circulation plan has been approved by the traffic engineering division. 9. Stormwater Management: A conceptual and final stormwater plan has been reviewed and approved by the Public Works Department. The applicant will need to obtain a Type "B" stormwater management permit from Public Works prior to site plan release. 10. Off -Street Parking: Existing: Phase I Expansion: Total: August 12, 1997 Required 168 spaces Proposed 168 spaces 107 spaces 118 spaces 275 spaces 286 spaces 59 BQ0K 102 FADE 282 BQOK M PAGE 283 Of the total 286 parking spaces proposed, 248 spaces are proposed in the northern portion of the site, with the northernmost edge of parking spaces to be located 20' from the northern property line. Within that 20' setback, there is an existing 10' wide Type "B" buffer with a landscaped berm that was constructed under the approved 1994 site plan. In the southeast comer of the site, 38 "staff only" spaces are proposed. 11. Landscaping & Buffering Plan: The landscape plan is in conformance with Chapter 926 landscaping and buffering requirements. This includes depiction of a Type "C" buffer which is required adjacent to the residentially designated properties along the north, south, and west boundaries -of the subject site. A 10' wide Type "B" buffer and landscaped berm has already been established along the northern site boundary, adjacent to Sandpointe Lane. 12. Lighting: The applicant is not proposing to change any of the existing lighting for the athletic fields. There will be new site lighting for the area of new construction, including the parking lot proposed to be located adjacent to the north property line. The applicant has indicated on the site plans that all new lighting will be shielded, and the source of illumination will not be visible from off-site. These provisions will meet county standards regarding light shielding. 13. Utilities: The school will continue to be serviced by City of Vero Beach water and sewer facilities. 14. Concurrency: Concurrency for schools is based on enrollment. Since the proposed expansion will increase enrollment, a concurrency certificate is required. The conceptual plan lists the present enrollment at 375 students which will increase to 540. Therefore, the applicant is required to obtain a concurrency certificate prior to building permit issuance, and has executed a concurrency acknowledgment agreement. Thus, concurrency requirements related to site plan approval are satisfied. 15. Environmental Issues: Previously, St. Edwards established a 6,100 square foot upland conservation area. This conservation area exceeded the site's native upland conservation area requirement which was related to a previous site plan approval. That easement was established based on 10% of the overall site's total native upland area of 60,000 square feet. Since the construction proposed with the current site plan request will impact the existing conservation easement, the applicant is proposing to relocate and increase the conservation easement to cover an area of 9,150 square feet. The 9,150 square foot area will satisfy the upland set-aside requirements applicable to the site. Staff has no objection to relocation of the conservation easement. Prior to site plan release, the conservation easement will need to be released and relocated as depicted on the site plan. The site's native upland habitat area consists of a coastal hammock located close to SR A -1- A. Although the new construction will result in destruction of a portion of the hammock, the proposed site plan and conservation easement will also preserve a portion of the hammock adjacent to SR A -1-A. The applicant is constructing a wet stormwater detention facility at the west end of the site. Because the lake area exceeds half an acre, littoral zone plantings are required The applicant's plans make provisions for the littoral zone planting. CEI August 12, 1997 M M, M 16. Specific Land Use Criteria: The following specific land use criteria apply: A. Sites for secondary schools shall be located near thoroughfares so as to discourage traffic along local residential streets in residential subdivisions. Elementary schools should be discouraged from locating adjacent to major arterial roadways; Note: The proposed expansion is located adjacent to the SR A -1-A thoroughfare. B. For the type of facility proposed, the minimum spatial requirements for the site shall be similar to standards utilized by the Indian River County school board and the State of Florida; Note: The applicant has demonstrated that the minimum spatial requirements will be met. C. No main or accessory building shall be located within one hundred (100) feet of any property line not adjacent to a street or roadway. No main or accessory building shall be located within fifty (50) feet of any property line abutting a local road right-of-way that serves a single-family area; Note: The plan provides building setbacks as follows: 78' setback from SR A 1-A, 115' setback from the south property line, and a 221' setback from the north property line. No new construction will be extended toward the west property line. These building setbacks meet the criteria. D. The applicant shall submit a description of anticipated service area and projected enrollment, by stage if appropriate, and relate the same to a development plan explaining: 1. Area to be developed by construction phase; 2. Adequacy of site to accommodate anticipated facilities, enrollment, recreation area, off-street parking, and pedestrian and vehicular circulation on-site including loading, unloading and queuing of school bus traffic; 3. Safety features of the development plan; Note: The applicant has provided this information and depicted on the site plan adequate traffic circulation and drop-off improvements, and pedestrian facilities. E. No rooms within the school shall be regularly used for the housing of students when located in a single family residential district; Note: The applicant has verified that no students will be housed on the site. F. The facilities shall have a Type "C" buffer in the A-1, A-2, A-3, RFD, RS -1, RS -2, RS -3 and RS -6 districts; 1. The Board of County Commissioners may waive or reduce the buffer requirements where the educational facility is located next to an existing cemetery, place of worship, child care facility, adult care facility, community center, or school. Consideration shall be given to security, noise, and visual 61 August 12, 1997 B®OK W PAGE 28.4 B00K 104 FACE 285 impacts. Where a waiver or buffer reduction is granted, normal perimeter landscaping requirements (such as fencing) may be required. Note: The applicant has depicted the appropriate buffers on the plan. G. The facilities shall have a Type "D" buffer in all other residential districts not listed in subsection F above. Note: This is not applicable. 17. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: North: Sandpointe West Subdivision/RS-3 South: The Moorings Golf Course/RS-3 East: S.R. A -1-A, Sandpointe Subdivision/RS-3 West: Indian River Lagoon/N/A RECOMMENDATION: Based on the analysis, staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners grant special exception use approval for the St. Edwards upper school expansion with the following condition: 1. That prior to site plan release, the applicant shall relocate the native upland conservation easement, as depicted on the site plan. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Application 2. Location Map 3. Site Plan 4. Landscape Plan 5. Draft Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes 62 August 12, 1997 •►AZI • �i _ — O v '00,40 p Director Boling also showed photographs of the Type B buffer which had been established some 18 months earlier on the north side of the subject property. 63 August 12, 1997 BOOK 102 PAGE 286 8®OK 102 PACE 287 The Chairman opened the public hearing and asked if anyone wished to be heard in this matter. Howard Connolly, representing the Board of Directors of the Sandpointe West Homeowners, stated that St. Edwards School has always been a good neighbor. He then advised of their concern about the proposed lighting in the parking area adjacent to their development. They were requesting restriction on the height and amount of illumination. Mr. Connolly next told of his personal concerns which were not acted upon by the Board of Directors because of time constraints. His first concern was traffic on AlA, a "limited access road." He wanted studies done on the impact the additional number of students would have on the AlA traffic. He also was concerned that the proposed auditorium (750 capacity) might be competition for Riverside Theater and not just used for school purposes. He thought there should be some covenant that the auditorium would be used only for the purpose of the St. Edwards' students and not any outside activities. Brad Jefferson, the owner of Lot 10 right next to St. Edwards, endorsed Mr. Connolly's remarks and shared his concern about lighting. He also was concerned about having a fence on the perimeter of the St. Edwards' property, not only for the safety and security of the students, but also from the standpoint of liability of the surrounding property owners. He felt that docks, vacant property, and construction would be an attraction for the students. He also hoped that the St. Edwards construction would be underway only during normal weekday business hours. Director Boling advised there was a proposal to lower the poll lighting height to 25 feet and shield the illumination away from the St. Edwards property line. Chairman Eggert understood that the Board still has to approve the final site plan. Director Boling clarified that the site plan approval had been submitted with this application and has been reviewed by the Planning and Zoning Commission. What is before the Board today is the special exception use approval. Staff does not presently have a lighting plan that shows the detail. It is not normally required with the site plan. It could be required, however. Chairman Eggert understood it was the Board's right to add conditions, and Director Boling confirmed her understanding. Commissioner Macht asked if the applicant had expressed any willingness to lower the lighting, and Director Boling advised that the applicant had stated they would 64 August 12, 1997 use 25' or lower poles and provide necessary shielding. Staff will actually go out and check to see how the shielding is working at the time of the certificate of occupancy. Commissioner Adams felt that because the lighting is a concern, the applicant should express a willingness to make sure the concerns are addressed from the onset. She thought the last thing they should do is put in 25' poles only to find out that the shielding is insufficient to take care of the concern. Dan Richey, President of St. Edwards School Board of Trustees, advised that one of the original objectives of the expansion was to continue to be a good neighbor. He reviewed the acquisition history of the property. He explained the instructions to the architect of the master plan were to design construction away from the neighboring areas using the natural buffer of AlA and the driving range at the Moorings. That objective was achieved in the plan under consideration. The intent was to direct the lighting away from the neighbors so there is no spillover of light. He wanted to clarify, with respect to the traffic concerns, that AlA is not a "limited access road", but is a "major artery". The traffic study showed there is no capacity problem and AIA is operating at an acceptable level of service (LOS) at this time. Another point -of -information, after the construction is completed, it is intended to have the middle school and the a grade (from the lower school) be part of the upper school's campus. He granted this was a minimal gain regarding AlA traffic, but worthy of mention. He maintained that traffic increases occur only at the peak school times; it is not an all -day situation. Mr. Richey stated that the proposed auditorium is not being built to compete with Riverside Theater. It was not designed like a typical theater to accommodate a traveling show. The intention is to have a building on campus for school use because, currently, there is no place on either campus to have an all -school assembly. The proposed auditorium will enable them to accomplish that. Mr. Richey pointed out that they are not doubling their enrollment, just looking to increase the capability of expanding the students' educational experience. Regarding a fence, Mr. Richey stated that all rules and regulations required for construction fencing would certainly be in place. He stressed that they desire to be good neighbors. He respectfully requested approval of their request so they are able to move forward with their fund-raising effort. Commissioner Adams asked if Mr. Richey could indicate if they were willing to look at other light pole sizes to accommodate the lighting concern. 65 August 12, 1997 8®0K 1020 FACE 288 800K 102 PAGE 289 Mr. Richey stated it was on the record at the Planning and Zoning Commission there was a willingness to work closely and "Mr. McNally" was told at that time that St. Edwards would involve them. He felt it would not be a problem because they are open to reviewing the lighting. Chairman Eggert asked if they would have a problem if "no lighting spillover" was a condition of approval and, although he had used those words, Mr. Richey replied that he was unfamiliar with technical aspects of lighting. Commissioner Ginn inquired if there was any requirement about intensification of land use under the Special Exception Use, and Director Boling explained that if the intensity increases by more than 10%, it has to come back through the Special Exception process and be approved by the Board. He added that enrollment is the intensification figure used for a school and that is why the numbers were included in staff's report. Community Development Director Robert M. Keating expanded the explanation by adding that with schools they do not have a density measure, such as with residential units per acre or floor area ratio. There is not a maximum intensity that this use could achieve. But with all the other restrictions, there is an overall limit on it and St. Edwards is still significantly under that. At the request of Commissioner Ginn, Director Boling explained the process St. Edwards had to undergo concerning a traffic study. They will need to get a concurrency certificate before they get a building permit and the capacity of AIA will be checked again at that time. Commissioner Ginn asked about the LOS of AlA if this is approved and voiced her concern about the AlA/17a` Street intersection, which she estimated was at LOS "E" bordering on "F" during the season. Director Keating stated that the minimum LOS allowed is "D" in this area. He thought that right now it was a "C" and would remain. He recalled that the AlA corridor study completed last year indicated that the 17t` Street Causeway intersection was close to capacity but with some signalization changes already made, capacity has actually been increased. The improvements required to maintain the capacity of the intersection up through the year 2010 are not needed until after 2000. Those are some of the improvements that are being recommended to the MPO for putting in the work program. :. August 12, 1997 Commissioner Ginn was astounded that the County allows an LOS of "D" on the barrier island. She asked if expansion was the original intent when St. Edwards was built on the barrier island. Mr. Richey responded that when the school was built in the mid -60's, it was like anything, "planning is a moving target." He acknowledged there was a plan in the minds of the founders that the school would grow with the community. It was determined that no one else wished to be heard and the Chairman closed the public hearing. At the request of Commissioners Ginn and Adams, Mr. Richey identified each of the buildings according to their numbers on the above sketch: administrative building, auditorium, new middle school, all-purpose facility for the middle school (small gym, kitchen, cafeteria), and fine arts. ON MOTION by Commissioner Macht, SECONDED BY Commissioner Tippin, the Board unanimously approved staff's recommendation with the condition that prior to site plan release, the applicant shall relocate the native upland conservation easement, as depicted on the site plan; and with the caveat that no light shines into the Sandpointe West Subdivision. (CLERK'S NOTE: At the conclusion of the above item (9:52 a.m.), the Chairman recessed the Board of County Commissioners meeting and convened the same members for a meeting/public hearing of the Solid Waste Disposal District. At the conclusion of the Solid Waste Disposal District Public Hearing (9:53 a.m.), the Chairman reconvened the Board of County Commissioners meeting and called for item 11.C. out of order. For purposes of continuity, these minutes are written as items appear on the Agenda.) 67 August 12, 1997 � FACE BOOK 1U� 890K 10PAGE 291, 9.AA PUBLIC HEARING - SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL DISTRICT — OCEAN SPRAYIHERCULES PROPERTY EXCHANGE (SEE SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL DISTRICT MINUTES) 11.B.1. COMPREHENSIVE EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT PLAN APPROVAL The Board reviewed a Memorandum dated August 5, 1997: TO: Honorable Board of County Co missioners FROM: Doug Wright, Director l Department of Emergency Services DATE: August 5, 1997 SUBJECT: Approval Of The Indian River County Comprehensive Emergency Management Plan (CEMP) Staff has been working diligently to develop a county emergency management plan that is coordinated and consistent with the State of Florida Comprehensive Emergency Management Plan (CEMP) and program in accordance with Chapter 252, Florida Statutes. The CEMP was developed using criteria established by the State Division of Emergency Management. The plan contains provisions to ensure that Indian River County is prepared for emergencies from a minor event to a catastrophic disaster. Staff has held meetings with representatives from the various municipalities, agencies, organizations, and interested citizens to receive input related to the development of this plan. Staff from the Florida Department of Community Affairs, Division of Emergency Management, spent the majority of a week in the County reviewing the plan. On July 23, 1997, a letter was received from the Florida Division of Emergency Management advising that the Indian River County Comprehensive Emergency Management Plan (CEMP) met the compliance criteria contained in Rule Chapters 9G-6 and 9G-7, Florida Administrative Code, and approval of the plan had been granted by the State. The Rule also provides for the Plan to be adopted by resolution by the Board of County Commissioners and the resolution submitted to the State within 90 days of the receipt of the plan approval. Staff is requesting Board approval of the attached resolution to comply with this requirement. ALTERNATIVES AND ANALYSIS: The CEMP is an all -hazard, operations oriented document which is submitted to the Board for consideration and approval. If the Board approves the plan as submitted, it will supersede the 68 August 12, 1997 O county's current Peacetime Emergency Management Plan and Recovery Plan which is outdated and does not interface with the State Plan and the Federal Response Plan. RECOMIVVIEENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners approve the Indian River County Comprehensive Emergency Management Plan and Resolution as submitted. MOTION WAS MADE by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED BY Commissioner Macht, to adopt the proposed resolution. Commissioner Ginn questioned the population of Vero Beach (22,000) in the plan; and Emergency Services Director Doug Wright stated it was not just within the municipal boundaries, but the general Vero Beach area. THE CHAIRMAN CALLED THE QUESTION and the motion was carried unanimously. (Resolution No. 97-079 adopted) RESOLUTION 97 - _Zq A RESOLUTION OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, BY AND THROUGH ITS BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS APPROVING AND ADOPTING THE COMPREHENSIVE EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR INDIAN RIVER COUNTY WHEREAS, Chapter 252, Florida Statutes, Disaster Preparedness Act, establishes a Division of Emergency Management (DIVISION) and prescribes the powers and responsibilities thereof; and WHEREAS, Chapter 252, F.S., assigns to the Board of County Commissioners responsibility for disaster mitigation, preparedness, response, and recovery; and WHEREAS, Rule 9G-6, Florida Administrative Code, requires submission by Indian River County (COUNTY) to the DIVISION of a triennial update of the COUNTY's Comprehensive Emergency Management Plan (CENP) Plan; and WHEREAS, Indian River County updates its plan annually, rather than only every three (3) years; and 690K 10(230 PAGE292 August 12, 1997 BGOK 102 FACE 203 WHEREAS, Rule 9G-6.006(9), F.A.C., requires that after determination by the DIVISION that the COUNTY's plan is in compliance, that the COUNTY approve a resolution officially adopting the CEMP for Indian River County; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that the 1997/1998 Indian River County CEMP, as approved by the DIVISION, is hereby adopted. The resolution was moved for adoption by Commissioner Adams and the motion was seconded by Commissioner Marht , and, upon being put to a vote, the vote was as follows: Chairman Carolyn K. Eggert Aye Vice -Chairman John W. Tippin Aye Commissioner Fran B. Adams Aye Commissioner Caroline D. Ginn Aye Commissioner Kenneth R. Macht Aye The Chairman thereupon declared the resolution duly passed and adopted this 12 day of August , 1997. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA BY ZL►4 41 Carolyn . Eggert Afairman Attests 11.B.2. EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT PREPAREDNESS AND ASSISTANCE FY 1996/97 GRANT FUNDS ALLOCATED FOR PURCHASE OF CAPITAL EQUIPMENT The Board reviewed a Memorandum dated August 5, 1997: TO: Board of County Commissioners THROUGH: Doug Wright, Director l Department of Emergency Services FROM: John King, Emergency Management Coordinator , Department of Emergency Services DATE: August 5, 1997 SUBJECT: Allocation Of Existing Grant Funds From The FY 96/97 Emergency Management Preparedness And Assistance (EMPA) Agreement To Purchase Capital Equipment It is respectfully requested that the information contained herein be given formal consideration by the Board of County Commissioners at the next scheduled meeting. 70 August 12, 1997 DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS: The Department of Emergency Services, Division of Emergency Management, presented the FY 96/97 Emergency Management, Preparedness and Assistance (EMPA) Agreement to the Board in November, 1996, and received approval to expend the funds consistent with the County/State agreement and in accordance with the prior approved 001-238 budget for this fiscal year. Since the 001-238 budget is approved by the Board prior to receiving final funding notice from the Florida Department of Community Affairs, staff routinely submits a very conservative budget request. The balance of funds are placed in a contingency account for capital improvements as governed by the grant and approved by the Board. The grant rules are explicit in that the eligible funding is to improve and expand the County's Emergency Management program. It is a direct violation of the grant to use any funding to supplant local revenues, in fact the County must annually send a financial spreadsheet validating that the local emergency management funding level has not declined as a requisite for future funding. As a condition of the grant, staff submits biannual progress reports relating to the Five -Year Strategic Plan (scope of work) found within the EMPA Agreement contract. Any EMPA monies not spent by Indian River County to improve the Emergency Management program have to be returned to the State and are pooled by the State and reallocated to other counties to enhance their programs. It is our goal to expend the available funds in lieu of returning them to the State for other jurisdictions to benefit from our portion of the funds. Staff is respectfully requesting the Board to authorize staff to utilize $17,875 in available 001- 238 contingency funds (current fiscal year funds) to improve and expand the Emergency Management Program in accordance with Rule 9G-19 on the following projects: 1. Upgrade/expand the telephone system used by the Department of Emergency Services, to include purchasing/replacing handsets, additional telephone locations, central office line cards, and required installation charges. This is consistent with Goal 7, Task 1, and Goal 10, Task 1, of the Five -Year Strategic Plan. 'Anticipated expense for the phone system upgrade is $2,275. 2. Continue with Phase II of computerizing the Emergency Operations Center (EOC). Last year, staff received Board approval to begin the process of purchasing laptop computers for the purpose of automating the internal messaging of the EOC. This request is to continue developing the EOC network by purchasing four (4) additional laptop computers. This is consistent with Goal 10, Task 1, of the Five -Year Strategic Plan. Anticipated expense for the four (4) laptop computers at $1,800 each is $7,200. 3. Purchase of three (3) 800 MHz portable radios to be utilized in the event of a local emergency. Present funding of the 800 MHz equipment did not afford staff any spare radios, radios for county staff who do not have assigned radios, or radios for volunteers or mutual aid personnel. This is consistent with Goal 3, Task 3, of the Five -Year Strategic Plan. Anticipated expense of the three (3) portable radios at $2,800 each is $8,400. TOTAL ANTICIPATE) GRANT EXPENDITURES $17,875 71 August 12, 1997 BOOK x.02 PAGE s";'J BOOK 102 PAGE 9J5 ALTERNATIVES AND ANALYSIS: The allocation of funds is based on monitoring reports, and on-site inspections of the local emergency management program which is conducted by the Florida Division of Emergency Management. During the last program analysis and evaluation, the County was found to be on schedule with our current Five -Year Strategic Plan. Since staff has estimated the prices for some of the above items, it is requested that the Board authorize staff to adjust the number of items purchased in order to expend the balance of the grant funds, in lieu of returning monies to the State for reallocation. These projects are timely in that they utilize outside funding to complete projects which are recommended by the Florida Division of Emergency Management. No County funds are required to match these grant purchases. RECOMMENDATION: Staff respectfully recommends approval of the purchase of non -capital and capital equipment to enhance the County's Emergency Management capabilities. It is also recommended that the Board approve staff to make the necessary minor adjustments to expend the balance of the grant funds in lieu of returning them to the State or reallocation to other jurisdictions. In response to Chairman Eggert's inquiry, Emergency Services Director Doug Wright confirmed this was a "use it or lose it" item. ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED BY Commissioner Macht, the Board unanimously approved the purchase of non -capital and capital equipment to enhance the County's Emergency Management capabilities and authorized staff to make the necessary minor adjustments to expend the balance of the grant funds in lieu of returning them to the State, as recommended in the Memorandum. H.C. GOVERNMENT ACCESS CHANNEL (CLERK'S NOTE: This item was heard before 11.B.1. and 113.2.) General Services Director H. T. "Sonny" Dean reviewed Memoranda dated July 24, 1997 and August 7, 1997: 72 August 12, 1997 TO: The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Rex Taylor. City Manager/Utilities Director DATE: August 7, #1997 SUBJECT: GOVERNMENT ACCESS CHANNEL // As you ars aware, Channel 13 on TCI is set aside for use by various governmental agencies. This channel has been used by Indian River County, the City of Vero Beach, the City of Sebastlan, the School District of Indian River County, and the Hospital Board to broadcast meetings. The School District also filled vacant slots on the channel on a day-to-day basis by broadcasting a variety of School District related programming. Indian River Community College has recently requested time on the governmental channel for Telecourses. Because of the amount of time and specific time slots requested by I.R.C.C., the traditional playback schedule for the Board of County Commission and City Council Meetings must be altered to accommodate this request. As you can see by the attached proposed programming schedule, the governmental access channel is becoming crowded. Due to this fact, we indicated to the County that we felt it might be better to wait and see 9 the I.R.C.C. programming could be played on a new edueatinnal channel. This suggestion stemmed from the recent request by the Indian River School District for a separate educational access channel to accommodate School District related program- ming. However, it is our undorstanding that the Indian River Cnimty Commission wishes to proceed with the request by I.R.C.C. so that Telecourses may be initiated for the fall semester. While my preference Is to delay I.R.C.C. programming until an oducational channel is established, Telecourses will probably need to wait for another year if time slots are not made available now. Although we have the right to object to the use of Channel 13 for this purpose, I would recommend agreeing to this request which will alter the re -play schedule of the City Council Meetings. A condition of this approval for I.R.C.C. should be that this is only a temporary arrangement and that their programming will be moved to an educational channel if, and when, one is available. Mr. Jim Chandler, County Administra- tor, concurred with this condition. Rex Taylor Date: July 24, 1997 To: Honorable Board of County Commissioners Through: H.T. "Sonny" Dean, Director Department of General Se es From: Terry L. Smith, Telecommunications Manager. Department of General Services Subject: Government Access Channel 73 MOK August 12, 1997 BOOK IU2 PAGE 2i7 BACKGROUND: The franchise agreements between Indian River County and the two cable companies that currently serve Indian River County, TCI and Falcon, set aside one channel for use by all governmental agencies in the County. These channels, 13 on TCI and 35 on Falcon, have been used on a shared basis for several years. The County has worked with the other franchise holders in the County, primarily the City of Vero Beach and the City of Sebastian, and with the School District of Indian River County in an effort to provide adequate public viewing of County Commission, City Council, School Board, and Hospital Board meetings. Coverage of special meetings, such as budget workshops, have been cablecast; informational programs from Emergency Services, the Sheriff, and other agencies have been aired. The School District has functioned as the day-to-day programming entity and has filled vacant slots with a variety of educational and other School District related programming. A letter dated March 18, 1997 to Commissioner Eggert from Dr. Edwin Massey, President IRCC, requested time on the existing shared channel for Telecourses. From the meetings which followed, two sample schedules were created which included time for IRCC Telecourses. Because of the amount of time requested by IRCC and because of the time slots requested, the traditional playback schedule for BCC and City Council meetings will have to be altered to accommodate the Telecourses. Schedules A and B (attached) were sent to the School District of Indian River County and Indian River Community College for review. The School District of Indian River County responded in writing with a preference for Schedule B. Indian River Community College sent back a copy of Schedule B (attached) with additional weekend hours marked for Telecourses; this was supposedly the result of a meeting between the School District and IRCC in which the School District gave up some of the time that had been scheduled for them on the weekend. City Council playback on Friday was extended to 9:00 AM for more adequate coverage. This altered Schedule B is attached and labeled as Proposed Schedule. A recent related incident has elevated the complexity of this issue. The School District of Indian River County has requested that the City of Vero Beach institute the educational channel that was reserved in the franchise agreement between TCI Cablevision and the City of Vero Beach. The City Manager of Vero Beach has indicated that since the logical location for Telecourses would be on an educational channel, it should be understood that if the franchising entities agree to the IRCC Telecourses on Channel 13, it is only a temporary arrangement and that if a separate educational channel is established, the Telecourses will be moved to that channel. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners agree to the inclusion of Telecourses from IRCC on the shared access channel even though it will alter the traditional playback schedule. It is understood that the other franchising entities also must agree to the proposed changes since the channel is a shared resource and all of the franchising entities have a legal right to the channel by virtue of the language in the franchise agreements between Indian River County and the two CATV companies (TCI and Falcon). It is further understood that the proposed schedule is to be used as a basic guideline for daily scheduling and is subject to change to accommodate special meetings or programming. The integrity of the live coverage of meetings will be a priority. Since those enrolled in the Telecourses will be relying on the programming for college credit, 74 August 12, 1997 efforts will be made to insure consistency if at all possible during the scheduled time slots for the Telecourses. Programming of an urgent nature, such as hurricane information from Emergency Services, may "bump" Telecourses or live meeting coverage, but this should be a rare occurrence. The schedule for Channel 35 on Falcon's system is subject to programming from the City of Sebastian as well as the programming shown on the schedules for TCI channel 13. It has not yet been determined how much of the new programming originated in the South County (which is available in its entirety to North County) will be cablecast over Falcon. The recent inclusion of Emergency Service updates on a regular basis during the week from six o'clock to seven o'clock PM during the hurricane season is not reflected in the proposed schedule since it is a seasonal change. Chairman Eggert understood that Indian River Community College had agreed to switch their programming to an educational channel if one became available, and Indian River Community College President Edwin Massey confirmed that understanding from the audience. MOTION WAS MADE by Commissioner Macht, SECONDED BY Commissioner Adams, to approve staffs recommendation. Under discussion, Commissioner Macht commented that the acquisition of a second channel is somewhat automatic when the first channel is filled. The cable companies are under an obligation to provide another one. He felt there was no need for concern, another channel would come in time. He also pointed out that the transmission of government programming takes priority. Commissioner Adams stated that her second was for discussion and she had some questions. Stating that she did not have cable TV, her questions had to do with the differences between what is shown now on the local government access channel, versus what will be should the Board approve. Telecommunications Manager Terry L. Smith and Chairman Eggert responded to her questions. County Administrator James E. Chandler stressed that there will be no changes in the programming of live government meetings, they will take precedent. 75 August 12,1997 BOOK 102 PAGE 22 i C (IQ F% i PROPOSED SCHEDUIX Sheell TCI CHANNEL 13 PEG CHANNEL PROGRAM SCHEDULE INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA 5 -Jun -97 TERRY SMITH 587-8000 EXT 318 MONDAY TUESDAY WEDNESDAYTHURSDAY FRIDAY SATURDAY SUNDAY MIDNIGHT - 1:00AM HOSPITAL BOARD REPLAY IRCC TELECOURSES IRC BCC REPLAY IRCC TELECOtIRSES CITY COUNCIL REPLAY C SCHOOL DIST PROD MC SCHOOL DIST PROD 1:00 - 2:00 HOSPITAL BOARD REPLAY TELECOURSEB RC BCC REPLAY IRCC TELECOURSES CITY COUNCIL REPLAY C SCHOOL GIST PROD SCHOOL DIST PROD 2:00 - 3:00 HOSPITAL BOARD REPLAY IRCC TELECOURSES IRC SCC REPLAY IRCC TELECOURSES CITY COUNCIL REPLAY IRC SCHOOL DIST PROD URC SCHOOL DIST PROD 3:00- 4:00 IHOSPITAL BOARD REPLAY IRCC TELECOURSES URC SCC REPLAY IRCC TELECOURSES CITY COUNCIL R Y URC SCHOOL DIST PROD IRC SCHOOL DUST PROD 4:00 - 5:00 HOSPITAL BOARD REPLAY CC TELECOURSEB RC SCHOOL SO REPLAY RCC TELECOURSES CITY COUNCIL REPLAY IRC SCHOOL DIST PROD SCHOOL DIST PROD 5:00 - 8:00 HOSPITAL BOARD REPLAY IRCC TELECOURSES RRC SCHOOL SD REPLAY IRC SCC REPLAY CITY COUNCIL REPLAY SCHOOL DIST PROD URC SCHOOL DIST PROD 8:00 - 7:00 HOSPITAL BOARD REPLAY NOA IRC SCHOOL SO REPLAY IRC SCC REPLAY CITY COUNCIL REPLAY IRC SCHOOL DUST PROG IRC SCHOOL DIST PROD 7:00 - 8:00 HOSPITAL BOARD REPLAY NDA RC SCHOOL SD REPLAY URC SCC REPLAY CITY COUNCIL REPLAY SCHOOL DIST PROD HOSPITAL BOARD REPLAY 8:00 - 9:00 6ENCY IRC BCC UTO -LIVE RC SCHOOL SD REPLAY URC BCC REPLAY CITY COUNCIL REPLAY URC SCHOOL DIST PROD HOSPITAL BOARD REPLAY 9:00- 10,00 LIBRARY STORY TIME UtC BCC UTO - LIVE LIBRARY STORY TIME LIBRARY STORY TM LIBRARY STORY TIME SCHOOL DIST PROD AL BOARD REPLAY 10:00 -11:00 IRCC TELECOURSES IRC BCC MTO - LIVE IRCC TELECOURSES IRCC TELECOURSES IRCC TELECOURSES CC TELECOURSE$ IRCC TELECOURSE$ 11:00 - NOON IRCC TELECOURSES URC BCC MTO - LIVE IRCC TELECOURSES IRCC TELECOURSES IRCC TELECOURSES C TELECOURSES IRCC TELECOURSES 12:00-1:00 PM IRCC TELECOURSES IRC BCC MIG - LIVE IRCC TELECOURSES IRCC TELECOURSES IRCC TELECOURSES C TELECOURSES IRCC TELECOURSES 1:00 - 2:00 IRCC TELECOURSES IRCC TELECOURSE$ IRCC TELECOURSES CC TELECOURSES SCHOOL DIST PROD IRC SCHOOL DIST PROD 2:00 - 3:00 CC TELECOURSES URC SCHOOL SO -LIVE IRCC TELECOURSES IRCC TELECOURSES IRCC TELECOURSE$ JIRCC SCHOOL OAST PROD C SCHOOL. DIST PROD 3:00 -4:00 NCY URC SCHOOL BD - LIVE NCY AGENCY AGENCY SCHOOL DIST PROD SCHOOL DIST PROO 4:00 - 5:00 NDA IRC SCHOOL SO - LIVE NCY ENCY CY SCHOOL DIST PROD IRC SCHOOL DIST PROD 5:00 - 8:00 AGENCY IRC SCHOOL SO - LIVE IRC BCC REPLAY HOSPITAL BOARD LIVEINC SCHOOL DIST PROD SCHOOL DIST PROD IRC SCHOOL DIST PROD 8:00 - 7:00 NDA IRC SCHOOL BD - LIVE IRC BCC REPLAY 40SPITAL BOARD LIVE IRC SCHOOL DIST PROD SCHOOL DIST PROD IRC SCHOOL DIST PROD 7:00 - 8:00 IRC SCHOOL STORY TIME CITY COUNCIL - LIVE IRC SCHOOL STORY TORE HOSPITAL BOARD LIVE IRC SCHOOL DIST PROD IRC SCHOOL DIST PROD IRC SCHOOL DIST PROD 8:00. 9:00 LULRARY ORIGINAL PROD CITY COUNCIL - LIVE LIBRARY ORIGINAL PROD HOSPITAL BOARD LIVE IRC SCHOOL DIST PROD IRC SCHOOL DIST PROD IRC SCHOOL DIST PROG 9:00 - 10:00 GENDA CITU COUNCIL - LIVE CITY COUNCIL REPLAY IRC SCHOOL SD REPLAY C SCHOOL DIST PROD SCHOOL DIST PROD SCHOOL DIST PROD 10:00 - 11:00 GENOA URC SCC REPLAY CITY COUNCIL REPLAY IRC SCHOOL 80 REPLAY SCHOOL DIST PROD URC SCHOOL DIST PROD URC SCHOOL DIST PROD 111:00 -MIDNIGHT GENDA C BCC REPLAY CITN COUNCIL REPLAY IRC SCHOOL BD REPLAY SCHOOL DIST PROD IRC SCHOOL DIST PROD URC SCHOOL DIST PROD NOTES: Agency refers to various agendas of the cities and county. Agenda refers to the schedule of future programs and the actual meeting agenda. Proprsmmer refers to the IRC School District - Craig Jerome. The time slots set for Agency programming will revert to the control of the programmer for alternative use H not used by Agendas. Due to varying lengths of meetings, the programmer will at his discretion switch and fill to maximize use and function of the time slots. The changes from week to week for the five coverage of meetings (eg. City Council 1st 3 3rd, School Board 2PM on 2nd Tues B 7:30PM on 4th) have not been shown but are understood. Time shown for meetings and associated playbacks which do not occur every week revert to the control of the programmer on off weeks. This schedule was developed to program blocks of time for IRCC Telecourses and as a possible treatment of playbacks so that changes could be discussed with the franchising authorities. Emergency hotification may bump any programming. Special requests for program slots by the franchising entity may bump IRCC or School District programming. Page 1 CD O I--� O UQ b O b O CD Q+ CD CD C y a t%I fD CQ+ R• a CD Mr. Smith indicated that the intent when working out the schedule was to provide a block of fairly consistent time to be allocated to the Indian River Community College telecourses so students could rely on the schedules. In working with the Indian River School District, there was a block of time from approximately 10 a.m. to 3 p.m. where the telecourses could be accommodated on Monday, Wednesday, Thursday, and Friday. An agreement was reached later for some weekend time. Some of the replay slots for government meetings are lost. Commissioner Adams thought that the intent of the channel is government access and she has received feedback from people who enjoy seeing 24 hour replays. Bottom line, she felt that the government programming should be on the government channel and the educational programming should be on an educational channel. She believed that if the educational channel starts in January, maybe that was when the educational programming should start. Administrator Chandler explained that there is no provision in our franchise for an educational channel, but staff is working with all concerned entities to work it out and get the additional channel for education. It will take some time because of the differences in the individual franchises. Commissioner Ginn noted that much of the Board of County Commissioners replay occurred in the wee hours of the morning. She asked if it would be possible to extend the replay to 8 p.m. on Wednesday. Mr. Smith advised that the "Agency", "Story Time", and "Library" programming is not yet developed, but the time has been allocated. It seemed to Chairman Eggert that "Story Time" would be better in the "Agency" slots on Wednesday. Commissioner Ginn agreed that it would allow extra time for the Board of County Commissioners' meeting replays to occur. Mr. Smith offered several examples and indicated that the schedule was "cast in Jello" because the various meetings differ from week to week and vary in length and time. Administrator Chandler commented that those "live" governmental meetings that are scheduled and those which change times and dates are the ones that are "cast in stone." The proposed schedule was worked around those. Mr. Smith pointed out that it is impossible to show on one schedule all the changes that will occur from week to week and day to day. 77 August 12, 1997 680K t�s�, f' GE •, BOOK 02 PAGE 301 Commissioner Macht suggested that the off -weeks might accommodate the "Agency" slots. THE CHAIRMAN CALLED THE QUESTION and the motion carried by a vote of 4-1 (Commissioner Adams opposed). 11.G.1. M6 STREET ROADWAY DRAINAGE REPLACEMENT — ROCKRIDGE S/D — JOINT PROJECT AGREEMENT WITH FDOT — DAMES AND MOORE, INC. The Board reviewed a Memorandum dated July 30, 1997: TO: James E. Chandler, County Administrator FROM: James W. Davis, P.E., Public Works Director SUBJECT: 16T" Street Roadway Drainage Replacement - Rockridge Subdivision Indian River County Public Works Department Joint Project Agreement with Florida Department of Transportation DATE: July 30, 1997 DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS In May, 1997 the Board authorized staff to prepare an agreement with the Florida Department of Transportation's consultant, Dames and Moore, Inc. to design the replacement of several stormdrain laterals which will connect to a large drainage culvert along the le Street ditch through the Rockridge Subdivision which the DOT is building. Attached is the Agreement staff has negotiated. RECOMMENDATIONS AND FUNDING Staff recommends the Chairman execute the attached agreement. Funding to be from 10 Local Option Sales Tax ($1,100,000 budgeted in FY98/99 for drainage purposes) ATTACHMENT 1) Excerpt from Board Minutes from May 20'hMeeting 2) Agreement 78 August 12, 1997 ON MOTION by Commissioner Ginn, SECONDED BY Commissioner Adams, the Board unanimously authorized the Chairman to execute the Agreement with Dames and Moore, Inc., as recommended in the Memorandum. AGREEMENT ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD 11.G.2. 1sT STREET S.W. RIGHT-OF-WAY ACQUISITION — 58TH AVENUE E%IPROVEMENTS/OSLO ROAD TO 26TH STREET — PARCEL NO. 130 — SCHWARTZ The Board reviewed a Memorandum dated August 5, 1997: TO: James Chandler County Administrator THROUGH: James W. Davis, P.E. Public Works Director Terry B. Thompson, P. FC� Capital Projects Manager FROM: William M. Napier, SRPA, SRA Right -of -Way Agent SUBJECT: 18'Street SW Right -of -Way Acquisition 58"' Avenue Improvements/Oslo Road to 26th Street Parcel No.130, John S. & Karen A. Schwartz DATE: August 5, 1997 DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS Fifty feet (59) of additional right-of-way is needed on 1" Street SW for road widening and pavement transition to the proposed new bridge at 11 Street SW and 581' Avenue in conjunction with the above referenced project. The property owners have executed a contract at a price of $18,000.00 per acre for the A- 1 Zoned land. This price per acre is comparable to other similar A-1 Zoned parcels the County has purchased within the market area based upon appraisals or evaluations. The contract price is $12,880.80 based on a total of .7156 acres determined by legal description. 79 Boa A2 PAGE30 August 12, 1997 8®0K 102 PAGE= An additional. row of citrus trees outside the right-of-way may need to be purchased at a later date, if required, to restore the ditches or re -align the grove irrigation furrows. Staff requests the Board of County Commissioners approve the $12,880.80 purchase and authorize the Chairman to execute the contract. Funding to be from Account #315-214- 541-066.12. 315-214541-066.12. ON MOTION by Commissioner Ginn, SECONDED BY Commissioner Tippin, the Board unanimously approved the acquisition of 40' of additional right-of-way on 19' Street SW from John S. & Karen A. Schwartz (Parcel 130) at $121880.80 and authorized the Chairman to execute the Contract, as recommended in the Memorandum. COPY OF CONTRACT ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD 11.H.1. WEST MEADOWS SUBDIVISION - PETITION WATER SERVICE - RESOLUTIONS I AND H (45TH.,AVENUE & 45"H COURT, NORTH OF 4TH STREET) The Board reviewed a Memorandum dated July 25, 1997: DATE: JULY 25, 1997 TO: JAMES E. CHANDLER COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR FROM: JAMES W. DAVIS, P.E. INTERIM DIRECTOR OF UTILITY SERVICE PREPARED JAMES D. CHA WI AND STAFFED MANAGER OF XUZBPMENT PROJECTS BY: DEPARTMENT OF UTILITY SERVICES SUBJECT: WEST 1W.ADOWS SUBDIVISION PETITION WATER SERVICE (45TH AVENUE AND 45TH COURT, NORTH OF 4TH STREET) INDIAN RIVER COUNTY PROJECT NO. UW -97 -05 -DS RESOLUTIONS I AND II August 12, 1997 f j.T4 �h �Z•T•1, ► � On May 6, 1997, the Indian River Commissioners unanimously authorized design engineering necessary in order project. Design has been completed by Services' staff. We are now ready process associated with this project. and minutes of the above meeting.) ANALYSIS County Board of County staff to proceed with the to proceed with the above the Department of Utility to begin the assessment (See attached agenda item All lots within this 28 residential lot subdivision are .54 acres. One lot at the southeast corner of 45th Avenue and 4th Street has been connected to County water since 1992, without an agreement to be included in this assessment. Therefore, 27 lots are included in the attached preliminary assessment. Attached are Resolutions I and II for the assessment project. The total estimated project cost and amount to be assessed, including engineering and administration is $76,000.00. The estimated cost per square foot is $0.119693 (rounded). The attached map displays the area to benefit from the assessment project. This project is to be funded through the assessment of property owners along the proposed water line route. In the interim, financing will be from the assessment fund. RECO14MENDATION The staff of the Department of Utility Services recommends that the Board of County Commissioners approve the attached resolutions, which approve the preliminary assessment roll and establish the public hearing date. ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED BY Commissioner Tippin, the Board unanimously adopted Resolution No. 97-080, providing for water service to West Meadows Subdivision, providing for the total estimated cost, the method of payment of assessments, number of annual installments, and legal description of the area specifically served, as recommended in the Memorandum. 81 August 12, 1997 ax J 80 102 PAGE 305 Providing (First Reso.) 7/97(reso/wmeadow)Vk/DC RESOLUTION NO. 97- ao A RESOLUTION OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, PROVIDING FOR WATER SERVICE TO WEST MEADOWS SUBDIVISION (45TH AVENUE AND 45TH COURT NORTH OF FOURTH STREET); PROVIDING THE TOTAL ESTIMATED COST, METHOD OF PAYMENT OF ASSESSMENTS, NUMBER OF ANNUAL INSTALLMENTS, AND LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF THE AREA SPECIFICALLY SERVED. WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County has determined that the improvements herein described are necessary to promote the public welfare of the county and has determined to defray the cost thereof by special assessments against certain properties to be serviced by a water main extension to West Meadows Subdivision (45th Avenue and 45th Court north of Fourth Street), hereinafter referred to as Project No. UW-97- 05-DS; W 97- 05 -DS; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, as follows: 1. The County does hereby determine that a water line shall be installed to benefit 27 properties in West Meadows Subdivision, and that the cost thereof shall be specially assessed in accordance with the provisions of Sections 206.01 through 206.09 of the Code of Indian River County. 2. The total estimated cost to be assessed is $76,000 or $0.119693 per square foot to be paid by the property specially benefited as shown on the assessment plat on file with the Department of Utility Services. Assessments are to be levied against all lots and lands adjoining and contiguous or bounding and abutting upon the improvements or specially benefited thereby and further designated by the assessment plat with respect to the special assessments, with the exception of one lot which is not included. 3. A special assessment in the amount of $0.119693 per square foot shall be assessed against each of the properties designated on the assessment plat. This assessment may be raised or lowered by action of the Board of County Commissioners after the public hearing, at the same meeting, as required by the referenced County Code. 4. The special assessments shall be due and payable and may be paid in full within 90 days after the date of the resolution of the Board with respect to credits against the special assessments after completion of the improvements (the "Credit Date") without interest. If not paid in full, the special assessments may be paid in ten equal yearly installments of principal plus interest. If not paid when due, there shall be added a penalty of 1-1/2% of the principal not paid when due. The unpaid balance of the special assessments shall bear interest until paid at a rate to be determined by the Board of County Commissioners when the project is completed. 5. There is presently on file with the Department of Utility Services a plat showing the area to be assessed, plans and specifications, and an estimate of the cost of the proposed improvements. All of these are open to inspection by the public at the Department of Utility Services. 6. An assessment roll with respect to the special assessments shall promptly be prepared in connection with the special assessments. 7. Upon the adoption of this resolution, the Indian River County Utility Services Department shall cause this resolution (along with a map showing the areas to be served) to be published at least one time in the Vero Beach Press Journal before the public hearing required by Section 206.04. 82 August 12, 1997 The resolution was moved for adoption by Commissioner Adams , and the motion was seconded by Commissioner Tippin and, upon being put to a vote, the vote was as follows: Chairman Carolyn K. Eggert Aye Vice Chairman John W. Tippin Aye Commissioner Caroline D. Ginn Aye Commissioner Kenneth R. Macht Aye Commissioner Fran B. Adams Aye The Chairman thereupon declared the resolution duly passed and adopted this 12 dayof August, 1997. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS INDIAN T R COUNTY, FLORIDA Attt-_) c_ B By: �' �'`-�" Caroly . Eggert J K. Barton, k Chai an enpn r Cn AOOrOved Date *AnAdmirt d Legal ibu0,,zi !� 9 ue�t. 8 Fisk Mgr. ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED BY Commissioner Tippin, the Board unanimously adopted Resolution No. 97-081 setting a time and place at which the owners of properties located in West Meadows Subdivision and other interested persons may appear before the Board of County Commissioners and be heard as to the propriety and advisability of constructing the water main extension, as to the cost thereof, as to the manner of payment therefor, and as to the amount thereof to be specially assessed against each property benefited thereby, as recommended in the Memorandum. 83 August 12, 1997 600K I NO PAGE 306 BOOK 102 PAGE307 Time and Place (Second Reso.) 7/97(reso/wmeadowsMOC RESOLUTION NO. 97- 81 A RESOLUTION OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, SETTING A TIME AND PLACE AT WHICH THE OWNERS OF PROPERTIES LOCATED IN WEST MEADOWS SUBDIVISION (45TH AVENUE AND 45TH COURT NORTH OF FOURTH STREET) AND OTHER INTERESTED PERSONS, MAY APPEAR BEFORE THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS AND BE HEARD AS TO THE PROPRIETY AND ADVISABILITY OF CONSTRUCTING THE WATER MAIN EXTENSION, AS TO THE COST THEREOF, AS TO THE MANNER OF PAYMENT THEREFOR, AND AS TO THE AMOUNT THEREOF TO BE SPECIALLY ASSESSED AGAINST EACH PROPERTY BENEFITED THEREBY. WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County has, by Resolution No. 97- 80 determined that it is necessary for the public welfare of the citizens of the county, and particularly as to those living, working, and owning property within the area described hereafter, that a waterline be installed to serve 27 properties in West Meadows Subdivision (45th Avenue and 45th Court north of Fourth Street); and WHEREAS, it has been determined that the cost to be specially assessed with respect thereto shall be $0.119693 per square foot; and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners has caused an assessment roll to be completed and filed with the Clerk to the Board; and WHEREAS, Section 206.06, Indian River County Code, requires that the Board of County Commissioners shall fix a time and place at which the owners of the properties to be assessed or any other persons interested therein may appear before the Board of County Commissioners and be heard as to the propriety and advisability of constructing such water main extension, as to the cost thereof, as to the manner of payment therefor, and as to the amount thereof to be assessed against each property benefited thereby, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, as follows: The County Commission shall meet at the County Commission Chambers in the County Administration Building at the hour of 9:05 a.m. on Tuesday, September 2, 1997, at which time the owners of the properties to be assessed and any other interested persons may appear before said Commission and be heard in regard thereto. The area to be improved and the properties to be specially benefited are more particularly described upon the assessment plat and the assessment roll with regard to the special assessments. 2. All persons interested in the construction of said improvements and the special assessments against the properties to be specially benefited may review the assessment plat showing the area to be assessed, the assessment roll, the plans and specfications for said improvements, and an estimate of the cost thereof at the office of the Department of Utility Services any week day from 8:30 a.m. until 5:00 p.m. 3. Notice of the time and place of this public hearing shall be given by two publications in the Press Journal Newspaper one week apart. The last publication shall be at least one week prior to the date of the hearing. 4. The Indian River County Department of Utility Services shall give the owner of each property to be specially assessed at least ten days notice in writing of such time and place, which shall be served by mailing a copy of such notice to each of such property owners at his last known address. The resolution was moved for adoption by Commissioner Adam; , and the motion was seconded by Commissioner Ti ani n and, upon being put to a vote, the vote was as follows: 84 August 12, 1997 Chairman Carolyn K. Eggert Aye Vice Chairman John W. Tippin Aye Commissioner Caroline D. Ginn Aye Commissioner Kenneth R. Macht Aye Commissioner Fran B. Adams Aye The Chairman thereupon declared the resolution duly passed and adopted thisi 2 day of GNU 5 9 997. 3"efFReY K. Barto Clerk Attachment: ASSESSMENT ROLL BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS INDIAN VER COUNTY, FLORIDA By , P1- I Caroly K. Egge77ffi"r--- Chairman 165, h�sh Mgr. WEST MEADOWS SUBDIVISION WATER SERVICE PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT SUMMARY INDIAN RIVER COUNTY PROJECT NO. UW- 97 - 05 - DS PARCEL NO OWNER SCI. FEET ASSESSMENT 16 33 39 00004 0000 00002.0 PERKINS 23517 2,814.81 16 33 39 00004 0000 00003.0 LOVE 23517 2,814.61 16 33 39 00004 0000 00004.0 GRIFFETH 23517 2,614.81 16 33 39 00004 0000 00005.0 KONDZIOLA 23517 2,814.81 16 33 39 00004 0000 00006.0 SELPH 23517 2,814.81 16 33 39 00004 0000 00007.0 LUTHER 23517 2,814.81 16 33 39 00004 0000 00008.0 WALLACE 23517 2,814.81 16 33 39 00004 0000 00009.0 WRIGHT 23517 2,814.81 16 33 39 00004.0000 00010.0 DEMPSEY 23517 2,814.81 16 33 39 00004 0000 00011.0 MARSHBANKS 23517 2,814.81 16 33 39 00004 0000 00012.0 BARKETT 23517 2,814.81 16 33 39 00004 0000 00013.0 BRYAN 23517 2,814.81 16 33 39 00004 0000 00014.0 FERSCH 23517 2,814.81 16 33 39 00004 0000 00015.0 JOHNSON 23517 2.81481 16 33 39 00004 0000 00016.0 MACWILLIAM 23517 2,814.81 16 33 39 00004 0000 00017.0 WRIGHT 23517 2,814.81 16 33 39 00004 0000 00018.0 CLOUGHLEY 23517 2,814.81 16 33 39 00004 0000 00019.0 SCHWEY 23517 2,814.81 16 33 39 00004 0000 00020.0 WRIGHT 23517 2,814.81 16 33 39 00004 0000 00021.0 ROBERTS 23517 2,814.81 16 33 39 00004 0000 00022.0 MOORHOUSE 23517 2,814.81 16 33 39 00004 0000 00023.0 MONTUORO 23517 2,814.81 16 33 39 00004 0000 00024.0 JEFFERSON 23517 2,814.81 16 33 39 00004 0000 00025.0 GATES 23517 2,814.81 16 33 39 00004 0000 00026.0 ZWERNER 23517 2,814.81 16 33 39 00004 0000 00027.0 COLLINS 23517 2,814.81 16 33 39 00004 0000 00028.0 STEWART 23517 2,814.81 TOTAL SCI. FOOTAGE TO BE ASSESSED TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COST INCLUDING ENGINEERING AND ADMINISTRATION AND AMOUNT TO BE ASSESSED FINAL ASSESSMENT COST PER SO. FT. ROUNDED JULY 25, 1997 J. D. C. WMDOWS2.WK4 August 12, 1997 85 634,959 $76,000.00 $0.11969276756 $0.119693 Ba IUB PACE •,his BOOK PAGE.309 d r+aaafa•uafarwr!•arrrriwr#arirraararawaawaarr+awwrrfrw•alta••rrrrlrararwwaawaaaarr+r!#atraarfawrlwaarrar#•aa#a+AAAaa#wt+Aa PARCEL # 16 33 39 00004 0000 00002.0 SQ. FT. 23,517 ASSESSMENT 2,814.81 OWNER PERKINS, RICHARD E 440 45TH AV VERO BEACH, FL. 32962-1841 I LEGAL WEST MEADOWS SUB PBI 10-82 LOT 2 arHflaaNAar*•ftrarfr}alliaM•ia}•a}aRaaa►}awwlRfHaawtwt}ai4alNtrawa}}•}*4*arriAAi*r}r*is}AaaNAArw}a}rarRafR+irlrta4fat PARCEL # 16 33 39 00004 0000 00003.0 SO. FT. 23,517 ASSESSMENT 2,814.81 OWNER LOVE, F E & DOROTHY E 470 45 TH AV VERO BEACH, FL. 32968-1841 r LEGAL WEST MEADOWS SUB PBI 10-82 LOT 3 rarrawrraara►lwarlaaiAr*aaawrrrrafrawaff+#raraar*AA+lfwwawarrarfrltowtrrrrrrrRaaa:aar►fRaarawrlar•+waarrra•rarlAAArfrr#A•Aw PARCEL # 16 33 39 00004 0000 00004.0 SQ. FT. 23,517 ASSESSMENT 2,814.81 OWNER GRIFFETH , MARC A & JOYCE V 490 45 TH AV i VERO BEACH ;- FL. 32968-1841 r WEST MEADOWS SUB PBI 10-82 LOT 4 ♦flraRfrRraflfarral•t•aff•ai!lraAwf#r4rAr4r•RarrlrlaArarlA#+♦itRri}fAAAflr4fa•RrairifRl•##wRtllrrR+awarrRrfaa •ra•alaafa•far PARCEL # 16 33 39 00004 0000 00005.0 SQ. FT. 23,517 ASSESSMENT 2,814.81 OWNER KONDZIOLA , MICHAEL & MARY E 510 45 TH AV VERO BEACH, FL 32968-1855 WEST MEADOWS SUB PBI 10-82 LOT 5 frrfalrw+ArraaAlra}ria}a#Aaala}A•*a}A•rrrar#t1Arf♦Aaa*wlttaaaarRAwaawaarAriwaAwalrawawrillaaRAArlRwARaAaaRrRatwa+Alta+f#ata PARCEL # 16 33 39 00004 0000 00006.0 SQ. FT. 23,517 ASSESSMENT 2,814.81 OWNER SELPH , JESSE & CHARLOTTE K 550 45 TH AV VERO BEACH, FL 32968-1855 WEST MEADOWS SUB PBI 10-82 LOT 6 earfr•rrwasawarraaawr►!lrararwarawawaAr♦rr!lawraw}riArraiirrr#awfrrar♦taaaarwrwrl+4raarrfrarrraw+twflrA:rrrraa*fAaR:awwA+*w PARCEL # 16 33 39 00004 0000 00007.0 SQ. FT. 23,517 ASSESSMENT 2,814.81 OWNER LUTHER, HELEN 590 45 TH AV VERO BEACH, FL 32966-1855 WEST MEADOWS SUB PBI 10-82 LOT 7 •AAAaraaAff}♦AAr4aar+altar}•frrwffraraawwaA4rw•rrwrarawfawAAfaawwrr4rrawrrrww•!a•}RRraarr:+rrrar•aw#rrta•aarAr!lxraftr•rAr+ PARCEL # 16 33 39 00004 0000 00008.0 SQ. FT. 23,517 ASSESSMENT 2,814.81 OWNER WALLACE, KYLE D & SUSAN VANN 595 45 TH AV VERO BEACH, FL 32968-1842 WEST MEADOWS SUB PBI 10-82 LOT 8 fi1aRR#AwraaltafwwwaflRwwwaaafwaa*rfaaafRAR*RAa!*f4fwawawrw4Aarr}lrAaR4Rl4•**AaRRtAaar4rrAxawAwrkR++wAAAr+riafr4•i1tA+R#ar+ PARCEL # 16 33 39 00004 0000 00009.0 SQ. FT. 23,517 ASSESSMENT 2,814.81 OWNER WRIGHT, EDWIN G & FREDA R 2210 15 TH PL , VERO BEACH, FL 32960-3244 WEST MEADOWS SUB PBI 10-82 LOT 9 •++atfw+rraraarwt}Crawlwtawrfraarr♦rwwwwrrr+aa4i++aaaawaawaral4!*aa4rw4rrRaaaaraa4aararr+r•rwaarrraaa••x•aakaRARAwra+ar+aa4 PARCEL # 16 33 39 00004 0000 00010.0 SQ. FT. 23,517 ASSESSMENT 2,814.81 OWNER DEMPSEY , DANIEL & RANDI 6910 33 RD ST , VERO BEACH, FL 32960-1406 - i WEST MEADOWS SUB PBI 10-82 LOT 10 rwrr•RrAAarAa+Artarr}ar}rarrrlarwra!}arraaraw}Araarif+r+taw+r*riwaraawra}aaafwr}}wa*r+arawifawrwawraaraw#arRaaAr•+rr4aawraa PARCEL # 16 33 39 00004 0000 00011.0 SQ. FT. 23,517 ASSESSMENT 2,814.81 OWNER MARSHBANKS , ROBERT A & SUE 215 22 ND AV VERO BEACH, FL 32960 2656 WEST MEADOWS SUB PBI 10-82 LOT 11 rrrrr►f Afrrlr•!fa!•aaf*4r!lrwrrrarfar•rfaArrrrrr*wrfaarffrwaa•arfartafaafffArralafrArrwrfrffa•afaaaaafr4Artraww••a•taf•a#rr. I f August 12, 1997 PARCEL # 16 33 39 00004 0000 00012.0 SO. FT. 23,517 ASSESSMENT 2,814.81 OWNER BARKETT , GEOFFREY K & ALLISON M. 475 45 TH AV VERO BEACH, FL 32968-1842 WEST MEADOWS SUB PBI 10-82 LOT 12 alra♦raaa!!lraararr}ra�rrf•aarar!••arrArfaffwrr}iaraalrarraraaalraaaawawarriralA!!a•arwraralaaawlawfrflrtffatlffAf•Alawaaa• PARCEL # 16 33 39 00004 0000 00013.0 SO. FT. 23,517 ASSESSMENT 2,814.81 OWNER BRYAN, GEORGE R & LORI GIANOULIS P O BOX 697 VERO BEACH, FL 32961-0697 r� LEGAL WEST MEADOWS SUB PBI 10-82 LOT 13 ♦•rrfrrr!!lafrafrrwrlrarafrArwrrrrarrawrrraAwarrawrarirrarAarrfrawwArfrrraaarrria•wrrAlrrrrraa•ar•iAArrrfaaarraafarrrrrarra PARCEL # 16 33 39 00004 0000 00014.0 SO. FT. 23,517 ASSESSMENT 2,814.81 OWNER FERSCH , HARRY W III & HARRIETT 415 45 TH AV VERO BEACH, FL 32968-1842 LEGAL WEST MEADOWS SUB PBI 10-82 LOT 14 r•i.lArrrfarw.rfrarrr!♦fraver!!r!!!al♦r•i!a•rArra!•rrrrfrAlwaa!!w••arfwwawaarrrrrarfwfraaAfaraaAfrrrrirawAA••rrafrlawlatfr!! PARCEL # 16 33 39 00004 0000 00015.0 SO. FT. 23,517 ASSESSMENT 2,814.81 OWNER JOHNSON, JERRY D & CONNIE K 410 45 TH CT VERO BEACH, FL 32968-1843 ! LEGAL WEST MEADOWS SUB PBI 10-82 LOT 15 !•ff•wa•rlAafAiaararra•rasa!aa•alr•arratrraitasiAAraritawawrrrrrlAaraarrrir!lAAlrrilfAaaraarwrwaa•AwwrfaawafarrlArfalarww•f PARCEL # 16 33 39 00004 0000 00016.0 SO. FT. 23,517 ASSESSMENT 2,814.81 OWNER MACWILLIAM , ROBERT & BARBARA 440 45 TH CT VERO BEACH, FL 32968-1843 LEGAL WEST MEADOWS SUB PBI 10-82 LOT 16 irrfar!lirAfaa}♦laraAwaArrwfarrrararwrrrwrrraArartfrrraarraarwiawarrr}arAwaraarwraA!•AaAAlrrA+arrarararralwarwaiaaifrawAla PARCEL # 16 33 39 00004 0000 00017.0 SO. FT. 23,517 ASSESSMENT 2,814.81 OWNER WRIGHT, EDWIN G &FREDA R 2210 15 TH PL VERO BEACH, FL 32960-3244 LEGAL WEST MEADOWS SUB PBI 10-82 LOT 17 iaAtr♦ffrAatifarwlwaaNAaA1lAraAalaAAAlAaaAikAArlaAfriflrr•faAlrfkAAAiaArtalifAitAf!lAA4AAiaAAlfaat!•r4fAiifaAAfaArflAf aaaA PARCEL # 16 33 39 00004 0000 00018.0 SO. FT. 23,517 ASSESSMENT 2,814.81 OWNER CLOUGHLEY , JAMES E & KIM M 490 45 TH CT VERO BEACH, FL 32968-1843 LEGAL WEST MEADOWS SUB PBI 10-82 LOT 18 •wflA!•r•aralararraalawaaaaarrlararaaaaraAAralirlarAfaarfaalawraararfrararwffwrrwarfffaiawawrarrAaawrAararwwararrrarlrrrA:a PARCEL # 16 33 39 00004 0000 00019.0 SO. FT. 23,517 ASSESSMENT 2,814.81 OWNER SCHWEY , PAUL H & BRONWYN 510 45 TH CT VERO BEACH, FL 32968-1856 LEGAL WEST MEADOWS SUB PBI 10-82 LOT 19 f!lard•Arlfawraaraaafiwiaff!►ataraw4w!#Alai•AwA1}rraiaiaAitirraatA♦rAlalfafttraairi!liatalAaiAaiAaraarfifiAAaaarafff•#!alive PARCEL # 16 33 39 00004 0000 00020.0 SO. FT. 23,517 ASSESSMENT 2,814.81 OWNER WRIGHT, EDWIN G & FREDA R 2210 15 TH PL VERO BEACH, FL 32960-3244 LEGAL WEST MEADOWS SUB PBI 10-82 LOT 20 /rtwr}arlrawaaAarrA}aaarAr:r}rrrlrrrwattrawrlrsiaarraarawlrairrarlr}!}rrrrrriarrrra}rrrAawrriAAwA•AAwwlrtrlAaarwwwrrarrrwr PARCEL # 16 33 39 00004 0000 00021.0 SO. FT. 23,517 ASSESSMENT 2,814.81 OWNER ROBERTS, CHARLES E III & BONNIE 590 45 TH CT VERO BEACH, FL 32968-1856 LEGAL WEST MEADOWS SUB PBI 10-82 LOT 21 a•kAfi}}iii}Aar}}}arafrr•iaaariff}}f}arlwllrrfAAfilaAAaifaA•A}}}}lirarailiarirrra}}}}aaaA}}arAa}}riAtflw•lfta A♦1ifAflAlfwif / I r 87 August 12, 1997 690K 1U"' FACE 310 BOOK 102 PAGE 3.1.j., PARCEL # 16 33 39 00004 0000 00022.0 SQ. FT. 23,517 ASSESSMENT 2,814.81 OWNER MOORHOUSE , GARY R & JUDITH A 595 45 TH CT VERO BEACH, FL 32968-1857 LEGAL WEST MEADOWS SUB PBI 10-82 LOT 22 ►atAiaiaa•rrrraitrrrarrrrAafiaarraaaawaifraAafrrtrrir•rfrwAAAf•AiarrwafAlA+rrirrrffararAtaar•!AalaltfAlrarfaAaAlAairualar PARCEL # 16 33 39 00004 0000 00023.0 SQ. FT. 23,517 ASSESSMENT 2,814.81 OWNER MONTUORO , VINCENT J JR & EVANTHIA K 555 45 TH CT VERO BEACH, FL 32968-1857 LEGAL WEST MEADOWS SUB PBI 10-82 LOT 23 s/arrfiarrarrarAirawAafawararaAarraarrawrrAAAAarrwrrrrrawrrA•rtrA••rfrrrArtrrarAfrraraffraraaa•rraraaaraAaarulAAtfaarAfAr• PARCEL # 16 33 39 00004 0000 00024.0 SQ. FT. 23,517 ASSESSMENT 2,814.81 OWNER JEFFERSON, RICHARD F & ELIZABETH A 185 16 TH AV f VERO BEACH, FL 32968-2708 LEGAL WEST MEADOWS SUB PBI 10-82 LOT 24 •AralaalAafa•aaarrrMAAAAAAiiiArArA•ar•aattfararflr}rratAafaraiaaraAAfAAlrAAriafwAArritiafAflAAarffi♦afrAffrlAAfaaAAtaiAAit PARCEL # 16 33 39 00004 0000 00025.0 SQ. FT. 23,517 ASSESSMENT 2,814.81 OWNER GATES, JOHN K & LAURA C 495 45 TH CT VERO BEACH, FL 32968-1844 LEGAL WEST MEADOWS SUB PBI 10-82 LOT 25 •l•rAAa!•ArrfaaaatarrrrraaaaaraafrraarrrarriwaafaaArrAarararrraaiariaaara•wrrAraaiariafarariiaaaaiarraraaala�ilwarraua•fAa PARCEL # 16 33 39 00004 0000 00026.0 SQ. FT. 23,517 ASSESSMENT 2,814.81 OWNER ZWERNER , JOSHUA E & LINDA S 475 45 TH CT VERO BEACH, FL 32968-1844 LEGAL WEST MEADOWS SUB PBI 10-82 LOT 26 afffrafia♦rararalttaaraar•fr•arrrafrrawwrarisaaaraaaawawiarrarffiartrrr:aaalAAiraratfarara}rrAA•frfAfwia♦lrrrrrftAAarlaaaa PARCEL # 16 33 39 00004 0000 00027.0 SQ. FT. 23,517 ASSESSMENT 2,814.81 OWNER COLLINS, JOHN CLAYTON & SARA JENAE 445 45 TH CT , VERO BEACH, FL 32968-1844 LEGAL WEST MEADOWS SUB PBI 10-82 LOT 27 tlafirrflfraiarlAraftfAAtai•lAiaAAA#AAAaarAfafairAwArAAlAAAiAAAAr•rAaaaraAAaa•tAftirfafAtfaaaAataafAAAarar•Aa•AaariffaAa•a♦ PARCEL # 16 33 39 00004 0000 00028.0 SQ. FT. 23,517 ASSESSMENT 2,814.81 OWNER STEWART , JOHN N & PAMELA G 415 45 TH CT VERO BEACH, FL 32968-1844 3 LEGAL WEST MEADOWS SUB PBI 10-82 LOT 28 !a••arraaraaaaaaraa}aArrra•waaarAAtwartrraarfraaarrarraararrwirf►aarrrrraawara♦aaariAaaaaaarfararfaaraffarwaaarawiaaaraarra TOTAL SQUARE FOOTAGE 634,959 TOTAL ESTIMATED COST TO BE ASSESSED 76,000.00 ESTIMATED COST PER SQUARE FOOT $0.11969276756 ROUNDED TO $0.119693 JULY,25 1997 JDC WMDOWS3.WK4 88 August 12, 1997 . ,. a � s i 11.H.2. GROVE PLACE MEDICAL CENTER — DEVELOPER'S AGREEMENT TO OVERSIZE LIFT STATION AND FORCE MAIN — OAK POINT DEVELOPMENT GROUP, INC. The Board reviewed a Memorandum dated August 1, 1997: DATE: AUGUST 1, 1997 TO: JAMES E. CHANDLER COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR FROM: JAMES W. DAVIS, P.E. INTERIM DIRECTOR OF UTILITY SERVICES PREPARED MICHAEL C. HOTCHKISS, P.E. 0 AND STAFFED ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEER BY: DEPARTMENT OF UTILITY SERVICES SUBJECT: DEVELOPER'S AGREEMENT TO OVERSIZE LIFT STATION AT GROVE PLACE MEDICAL CENTER CDS/CCS 616 BACKGROUND In conjunction with construction Center located on the south side River Memorial Hospital, we have lift station and force main to Exhibit A on attached developer's ANALYSIS of the new Grove Place Medical of 36th Street, west of Indian requested the over sizing of a serve the surrounding area (see agreement). This developer's agreement covers the over sizing of a sub -regional lift station and a 1,224 foot section of force main to serve the adjacent parcel to the west. Monies for over sizing of the lift station and force main will be recovered in the future as the parcel to the west develops. For details of the proposed cost- sharing, see Exhibits A, B and C. The total estimated project cost is $117,156.21. The total portion attributable to the County has been specified not to exceed $70,293.73 (see attached developer's agreement). Interim funding for this project will be from the impact fee fund. The developer for Grove Place has paid $12,560.00 in water impact fees and $20,408.00 in sewer impact fees for the initial phase, and is expected to pay an additional $31,200.00 in water impact fees and $67,104.00 in sewer impact fees during future planned expansions. RECOMMENDATION The staff of the Department of Utility Services recommends that the Board of County Commissioners approve the attached developer's agreement, approve the future recovery of costs contributed to the over sizing of facilities and authorize the Chairman to execute same, as presented. B®OK N FAGE312 August 12, 1997 Ger ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED BY Commissioner Ginn, the Board unanimously approved the Developer's Agreement with Oak Point Development Group, Inc. for the construction of a pump (lift) station and force main at Grove Place Medical Center; approved the future recovery of costs contributed to the over -sizing of facilities; and authorized the Chairman to execute the agreement as presented, as recommended in the Memorandum. AGREEMENT ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD 11.H.3. UTILITIES RATE STUDY The Board reviewed a Memorandum. dated August 5, 1997: DATE: August 05, 1997 TO: JAMES E. CHANDLER COUNTY ADMIMSTRATOR FROM: JAMES W. DAVIS, P.E. ACTING DIRECTOR OF UTILITIES Qtp) PREPARED ANA ANDERSON AND STAFFED PROJECT COORDINATOR BY: DEPARTMENT OF UTILITY SERVICES SUBJECT: RATE STUDY 102 PAAA BACKGROUND and ANALYSIS On May 13, 1997, the Board of County Commissioners approved to advertise for a Request for Proposals to have a rate and financial analysis conducted. Attached is the "draft" Request for Proposals for review and approval. RECOMMENDATION The staff of the Department of Utility Services recommends that the Board of County Commissioners approve the attached "Draft" Request for Proposals and authorize staff to proceed to advertise such request. 90 August 12, 1997 ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED BY Commissioner Tippin, the Board unanimously approved the "draft" request for proposals for a rate and financial analysis and authorized staff to proceed to advertise the RF?, as recommended in the Memorandum. DOCUMENTS TO BE MADE PART OF THE RECORD Retirement Award — Claude W. Hodeson 3N IMMOV 4zl� A0k G9 -4 is il4is is to rerttfy t4at is 4treby Vasenteb Tartirentrut Awarb for outstanbing performance and faithful struirt to AcAgn MWA WOW+ ffl.w4d'ol WOW+ W"Wdw�n� for ywdw grars of arruire an this &A MY Of 'Z64 a Robert M. Keating, i of Carolyn K. t&ert, Chairman Communi Pgye men Board of County Commissioners NMI,, W .' M7 01 9, August 12, 1997 Bo 102 PAGE -314 NOK 102 PAGE -315 SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL DISTRICT The Minutes of the Solid Waste Disposal District Public Hearing held this date are being prepared separately. There being no further business, on Motion duly made, seconded, and carried, the Board adjourned at 10:19 a.m. ATTEST: Je rey K. Barton, Clerk Minutes Approved 29L C 92 . August 1997 Carolyn Vhgert, Cha'