HomeMy WebLinkAbout12/16/1997MINUTES ATTACHED
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
INDIAN RIM'R COUNTY, FLORIDA
9 G E N D
IF -
TUESDAY, DECEMBER 16,1997
9:00 A.M. - COUNTY COMMISSION CHAMBER
County Administration Building
1840 25th Street, Vero Beach, Florida 32960
COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
Carolyn K. Eggert, Chairman (District 2)
John W. Tippin, Vice Chairman (District 4)
Fran B. Adams (District 1)
Caroline D. Ginn (District 5
Kenneth R. Macht (District 3)
James E. Chandler, County Administrator
Charles P. Vitunac, County Attorney
Jeffrey K. Barton, Clerk to the Board
BACKUP
9:00 a.m. 1. CALL TO ORDER
PAGES
2. INVOCATION Ray Scent, Chaplain, I.R.Mem. Hosp.
3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE - Chas. P. Vitunac
4. ADDITIONS to the AGENDA/EMERGENCY ITEMS
1. Delete Item 11-H-1, Lake Delores (Park Place) Mobile Home Park - Nelson Hyatt.
2. Add Item 13.E, comments regarding List of Warrants
5. PROCLAMATION and PRESENTATIONS
None
6. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
A. Special Meeting of December 1, 1997
B. Regular Meeting of December 2, 1997
7. CONSENT AGENDA
A. Received & Placed on File in Office of Clerk to
the Board: 1) St. Johns River Water Management
District 1998 Meeting Schedule for the Governing
Board and 2) I. R C. Hosp. Dist., Notice of Change
of Board of Trustees' Meeting from December 18,
1997 to December 15, 1997 at 6:15 p.m. in the
County Commission Chambers, 1840 25th St., V.B.
B. Approval of Warrants
(memorandum dated December 4, 1997) 1-11
C. Hammock Lakes S/D Modification to a Planned
Development Preliminary Plat/Plan Condition of
Approval
(memorandum dated December 10, 1997) 12-15
"'n
BACKUP
7. CONSENT AGENDA (cont'dZ 609K��. , ��� � �
PAGES
D. Award Bid #8021 / 129th St. Water Main Extension
(memorandum dated December 8, 1997) 16-19
E. Approval for Out -of -County Travel for any Commis-
sioner to Attend 1998 NACO Legislative Conference
Feb. 27 thru March 3, 1998 19A
8. CONSTITUTIONAL OFFICERS and
GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES
None
9:05 A.M. 9. PUBLIC ITEMS
A. PUBLIC HEARINGS
1. Claims Settlement: Zuckerman vs. Indian
River County
(memorandum dated November 26, 1997) 20-29
2. Amendments to Community Development
Block Grant (CDBG) Application
(memorandum dated December 8, 1997) 30-31
3. Final Hearing on Proposed LDR Amendments
(memorandum dated December 10, 1997) 32-62
B. PUBLIC DISCUSSION ITEMS
None
C. PUBLIC NOTICE ITEMS
None
10. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S MATTERS
None
11. DEPARTMENTAL MATTERS
A. Community Development
Request for Board Approval to Purchase the Judah
Property LAAC Site
(memorandum dated November 14, 1997) 63-67
B. Emergency Services
None
C. General Services
_ Award Bid #8022/U.S. #1 Water Main Extension
(memorandum dated November 24, 1997) 68-71
D. Leisure Services
None
E. Office of Management and Budget
None
F. Personnel
None
_ IWUP
11. DEPARTMENTAL MATTERS (cont'd.):
PAGES
G. Public Works
58th Ave. Right -of -Way Acquisition at SE Comer
of SR60/58th Ave. Intersection
(memorandum dated December 9, 1997) 72-81
H. Utilities
1. Lake Delores (Park Place) Mobile Home
Park - Nelson Hyatt
(memorandum dated December 10, 1997) 82-94
2. Sebastian Water Expansion - Phase I Final
Pay Request to Engineering Consultant
(memorandum dated December 4, 1997) 95-101
12. COUNTY ATTORNEY
None
13. COMMISSIONERS ITEMS
A. Chairman Carolyn K. Eggert
B. Vice Chairman John W. Tippin
C. Commissioner Fran B. Adams
D. Commissioner Caroline D. Ginn
E. Commissioner Kenneth R. Macht
14. SPECIAL DISTRICTS/BOARDS
A. Emergency Services District
1. Approval of Minutes - meeting of Sept. 16, 1997
2. Authorization to Purchase Hazardous Material
Trailer and Equipment with Combination of
.Funds Provided by Anonymous Donor and the
Vero Beach Volunteer Fire Department
(memorandum dated December 5, 1997) 102-104
3. Approval for Ten -8 Fire Equipment Company to
Perform Emergency Major Repairs/Refurbishment
to the Fire Division Pierce Aerial Platform Ladder
Truck Now Out of Service; & Funding Authorization
(memorandum dated December 4, 1997) 15-111
14. SPECIAL DISTRICTSBOARDS (cont'd )•
B. Solid Waste Disposal District
None
C. Environmental Control Board
None
15. ADJOURNMENT -
BACKUP
PAGES
60,1(
Anyone who may wish to appeal any decision which may be made at this meeting will need
to ensure that a verbatim record. of. the proceedings is made which includes the testimony and
evidence upon which the appeal will be based.
Anyone who needs a special accommodation for this meeting may contact the county's
Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) coordinator at 567-8000 x408 at least 48 hours in advance
or meeting.
Meeting may be broadcast live on TCI Cable Channel 13 - rebroadcast various times
throughout the week
Falcon Cable Channel 35 - rebroadcast Friday evening
INDEX TO MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING
OF BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
DECEMBER 16, 1997
1. CALL TO ORDER .............................................. -1-
2. INVOCATION ................................................. -1-
3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ...................................... -1-
4. ADDITIONS TO THE AGENDA .................................. -1-
6. APPROVAL OF MINUTES ....................................... .2-
7. CONSENT AGENDA ........................................... -2-
7.A. Reports ................................................. .2-
7.B. List of Warrants ........................................... .3-
7.C. Hammock Lakes Subdivision - Modification to Planned Development
Preliminary Plat - Plan Condition of Approval .................... .9-
7.D. Bid #8021- 129' Street Water Main Extension - Treasure Coast
Contracting ............................................. .11-
7.E. Out -of -County Travel - 1998 NACo Legislative Conference - February 27
through March 3, 1998 .................................... .12-
9.A. PUBLIC HEARINGS ........................................... .13-
9.A. 1.
3-9.A.1. ZUCKERMAN VS. INDIAN RIVER COUNTY - CLAIMS
SETTLEMENT .......................................... .13-
9.A.2. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT (CDBG)
APPLICATION AMENDMENTS ............................ .15-
9.A.3. PROPOSED LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS (LDR)
AMENDMENTS - FINAL HEARING ........................ .18 -
DECEMBER 16, 1997
I LA. JUDAH PROPERTY LAAC SITE - PURCHASE ..................... .40-
11.C. BID #8022- U.S.#1 WATER MAIN ................................ .42-
1 l.G. 58TH AVENUE RIGHT-OF-WAY ACQUISITION - SE CORNER OF SR -60
AND 58TH AVENUE INTERSECTION - SOUTHERN DEVELOPMENT
SERVICES (JIM ZENGAGE)........................................ .43-
11.11.1. LAKE DELORES (PARK PLACE) MOBILE HOME PARK - NELSON
HYATT..................................................... .44-
11.H.2. SEBASTIAN WATER EXPANSION - PHASE I FINAL PAY REQUEST -
MASTELLER AND MOLER, INC . .......................... -45-
D.E. COMMENTS REGARDING LIST OF WARRANTS .................. .46-
14.A. EMERGENCY SERVICES DISTRICT ............................. .46-
14.B. SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL DISTRICT ............................ .46-
14.C. ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL BOARD .......................... .46 -
DECEMBER 16, 1997
-2-
December 16, 1997
REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS
The Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida, met in Regular
Session at the County Commission Chambers, 1840 25' Street, Vero Beach, Florida, on
Tuesday, December 16, 1997, at 9:00 a.m. Present were Carolyn K. Eggert, Chairman; John
W. Tippin, Vice Chairman; Kenneth R. Macht; and Caroline D. Ginn. Also present were
James E. Chandler, County Administrator; Charles P. Vitunac, County Attorney; and
Patricia "PT' Jones, Deputy Clerk.
Commissioner Fran B. Adams was out of town.
1. CALL TO ORDER
Chairman Eggert called the meeting to order.
2. INVOCATION
Ray Scent, Chaplain of Indian River Memorial Hospital gave the Invocation.
3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
County Attorney Vitunac led the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag.
4. ADDITIONS TO THE AGENDA
County Administrator Chandler requested the deletion of Item 11-H-1, Lake Delores
(Park Place) Mobile Home Park - Nelson Hyatt.
Commissioner Macht requested the addition of Item 13-E, comments regarding List
of Warrants.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Ginn, SECONDED
by Commissioner Tippin, the Board, by a 4-0 vote
(Commissioner Adams being absent) unanimously
deleted Item 11-H-1 from the Agenda.
DECEMBER 16, 1997
UA Fp6E '
ON MOTION by Commissioner Tippin,
SECONDED by Commissioner Ginn, the Board, by
a 4-0 vote (Commissioner Adams being absent)
unanimously added Item 13-E to the Agenda.
6. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
The Chairman asked if there were any corrections or additions to the Minutes of the
Special Meeting of December 1, 1997 or to the Minutes of the Regular Meeting of December
2, 1997. There were none.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Tippin,
SECONDED by Commissioner Ginn, the Board, by
a 4-0 vote (Commissioner Adams being absent)
unanimously approved the Minutes of the Special
Meeting of December 1, 1997, as written.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Ginn, SECONDED
by Commissioner Tippin, the Board, by a 4-0 vote
(Commissioner Adams being absent) unanimously
approved the Minutes of the Regular Meeting of
December 2, 1997, as written.
7. CONSENT AGENDA
Commissioner Ginn requested that Item 7-D be pulled for discussion.
7.A. REPORTS
Received and placed on file in the Office of the Clerk to the Board:
1. St. Johns River Water Management District 1998 Meeting Schedule for the
Governing Board.
2. Indian River County Hospital District, Notice of Change of Board of
Trustees' Meeting from December 18, 1997 to December 15, 1997 at 6:15
p.m. in the County Commissioner Chambers, 1840 25' Street, Vero Beach.
DECEMBER 16, 1997
ZR LIST OF WARRANTS
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of December 4, 1997:
TO: HONORABLE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
DATE: DECEMBER 4. 1997
SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF WARRANTS
FROM: EDWIN M. FRY, JR., FINANCE DIRECTOR
In compliance with Chapter 136.06, Florida Statutes, all warrants issued
by the Board of County Commissioners are to be recorded in the Board minutes.
Approval is requested for the attached list of warrants, issued by the Clerk
to the Board, for the time period of November 26 to December 4, 1997.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Tippin,
SECONDED by Commissioner Ginn, the Board, by
a 4-0 vote (Commissioner Adams being absent)
unanimously approved the list of Warrants as issued
by the Clerk to the Board for the period from
November 26, 1997 through December 4, 1997, as
recommended by staff.
CHECK
NAME
CHECK
CHECK
NUMBER
DATE
AMOUNT
0018987
JOHNSON, MIRE
11/26/97
245.00
0018988
MOBLEY, JUNE
11/26/97
623.66
0018989
COOGAN, MAUREEN
11/26/97
896.02
0018990
HANCOCK, DON E
11/26/97
300.00
0018991
LEDUC, SUSAN M
11/26/97
300.00
0018992
YOUNG, ANDRE M
11/26/97
300.00
0018993
MOEN, LISA M
12/01/97
300.00
0018994
TEAMSTERS LOCAL UNION NO 769
12/03/97
3,643.19
0018995
FT PIERCE, CITY OF
12/03/97
575.22
0233394
A A FIRE EQUIPMENT, INC
12/04/97
12.00
0233395
A B C- C L I O, INC
12/04/97
139.10
0233396
ACE PLUMBING, INC
12/04/97
166.20
0233397
ACTION TRANSMISSION AND
12/04/97
600.00
0233398
AERO PRODUCTS CORPORATION
12/04/97
2,483.40
0233399
A G L L
12/04/97
2,234.86
0233400
AIRBORNE EXPRESS
12/04/97
47.85
0233401
ALBERTSONS SOUTHCO $4357
12/04/97
232.15
0233402
ALPHA ACE HARDWARE
12/04/97
56.33
0233403
AMERICAN LIBRARY ASSOCIATION
12/04/97
145.00
0233404
ARMFIELD-WAGNER APPRAISAL
12/04/97
600.00
0233405
ATLANTIC REPORTING
12/04/97
2,534.25
0233406
AT&T
12/04/97
45.21
0233407
ALL FLORIDA BEVERAGE & OFFICE
12/04/97
59.95
0233408
ARROWHEAD VERO BEACH HIGH
12/04/97
95.00
0233409
ABARE, EDWARD J III
12/04/97
8.70
0233410
AMERICAN AIR FILTER
12/04/97
2,573.64
0233411
ALLIED COLLOIDS, INC
12/04/97
3,889.62
0233412
A T & T
12/04/97
25.79
0233413
ALBERTSON'S
12/04/97
446.28
0233414
ADAMS MEDIA CORP
12/04/97
265.75
0233415
AUTO PARTS OF VERO, INC
12/04/97
175.20
DECEMBER 16, 1997
L
DECEMBER 16, 1997
-4-
103
d5
CHECK
NAME
CHECK
CHECK
NUMBER
DATE
AMOUNT
0233416
ARCHTECTS & DESIGNERS
12/04/97
230.49
0233417
AMERICAN REPORTING
12/04/97
45.00
0233418
ADAMS, DARRELL
12/04/97
108.00
0233419
BAIRD, JOSEPH A
12/04/97
403.62
0233420
BAKER DISTRIBUTING CO
12/04/97
206.52
0233421
BARRYS ORNAMENTAL IRON
12/04/97
330.00
0233422
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
12/04/97
5,996.22
0233423
BENSONS LOCK SERVICE
12/04/97
7.00
0233424
BETTER BUSINESS FORMS, INC
12/04/97
841.24
0233425
BILL'S TV SERVICE CENTER, INC
12/04/97
566.43
0233426
BLACKHAWK QUARRY COMPANY
12/04/97
3,471.23
0233427
BELLSOUTH MOBILITY
12/04/97
36.89
0233428
BARTON, JEFFREY K -CLERK
12/04/97
6,953.43
0233429
BARTON, JEFFREY K -CLERK
12/04/97
53.00
0233430
BRIDGESTONE SPORTS, INC
12/04/97
595.94
0233431
BAKER & TAYLOR INC
12/04/97
4,482.00
0233432
BRODART CO
12/04/97
178.63
0233433
BRUGNOLI, ROBERT J PHD
12/04/97
500.00
0233434
BLAIS ELECTRIC, INC
12/04/97
60.00
0233435
BIGGINS, SEAN ESQ
12/04/97
540.00
0233436
BAKER & TAYLOR ENTERTAINMENT
12/04/97
160.70
0233437
BELLSOUTH
12/04/97
7,380.43
0233438
BEACHAM PUBLICATING CORP
12/04/97
282.75
0233439
BLUE CROSS/BLUE SHIELD OF
12/04/97
8,118.00
0233440
BELLSOUTH PUBLIC COMMUNICATION
12/04/97
349.56
0233441
BASE CAMP OUTLET
12/04/97
1,808.20
0233442
BOISE CASCADE OFFICE PRODUCTS
12/04/97
177.60
0233443
BAKER & TAYLOR INC
12/04/97
2,113.15
0233444
BRUCE, KELLY
12/04/97
18.03
0233445
BROWN, VIRGINIA
12/04/97
100.50
0233446
BAKER, SANDRA
12/04/97
267.50
0233447
BURNETTE & ASSOCIATES
12/04/97
84.00
0233448
BIND -IT
12/04/97
81.67
0233449
BELLSOUTH
12/04/97
36.90
0233450
BUSINESS & LEGAL REPORTS INC
12/04/97
162.70
0233451
CAMP, DRESSER & MCKEE, INC
12/04/97
17,000.00
0233452
CARTER ASSOCIATES, INC
12/04/97
1,170.00
0233453
CATAPHOTE INC
12/04/97
1,552.00
0233454
CHANDLER EQUIPMENT CO, INC
12/04/97
167.05
0233455
CITRUS MOTEL
12/04/97
218.00
0233456
CLEMENT COMMUNICATIONS, INC
12/04/97
442.00
0233457
CLEMENTS PEST CONTROL
12/04/97
19.00
0233458
COMMUNICATIONS INT'L INC
12/04/97
1,234.80
0233459
CORBIN, SHIRLEY E
12/04/97
483.00
0233460
CHEMSEARCH
12/04/97
862.82
0233461
CLUB CAR, INC
12/04/97
7,242.30
0233462
COMMERCE, NOAA, NCDC
12/04/97
45.00
0233463
COASTAL REFINING & MARKETING
12/04/97
6,709.83
0233464
COPELAND, LINDA
12/04/97
136.50
0233465
CONSTRUCTION LICENSING
12/04/97
40.00
0233466
CUSTOM CARRIAGES, INC
12/04/97
1,117.33
0233467
CHILBERG CONSTRUCTION CO INC
12/04/97
25,449.48
0233468
COOGAN, MAUREEN
12/04/97
387.28
0233469
CALLAWAY GOLF COMPANY
12/04/97
96.25
0233470
CINDY'S PET CENTER, INC
12/04/97
35.13
0233471
COMMERCIAL SERVICE COMPANY
12/04/97
159.98
0233472
CUES, INC
12/04/97
1,032.15
0233473
CARTER, BECKY
12/04/97
118.45
0233474
C-4 IMAGING SYSTEMS INC
12/04/97
124.83
0233475
CLIFFORD, MIKE
12/04/97
100.00
0233476
CORPORATION OF THE PRESIDENT
12/04/97
110.50
0233477
CAMPBELL, STEPHANIE
12/04/97
56.65
0233478
CRAWFORD, SANDY
12/04/97
37.00
0233479
CENTER FOR EMOTIONAL AND
12/04/97
285.00
0233480
COLUMBIA HOUSE
12/04/97
23.54
0233481
CARTER, KELLY
12/04/97
123.60
0233482
COLLEGE BOARD PIIBLICATIONS
12/04/97
27.45
0233483
CUMMINS, CHERYL
12/04/97
48.00
0233484
CONSOLIDATED RESOURCE RECOVERY
12/04/97
7,994.36
0233485
CHAKRABORTY, RANAJIT DR
12/04/97
1,250.00
0233486
CENTRAL A/C & REFRIG SUPPLY,
12/04/97
255.43
0233487
DAILY COURIER SERVICE
12/04/97
336.00
0233488
DAVES SPORTING GOODS
12/04/97
1,522.87
0233489
DEAN, H T "SONNY"
12/04/97
31.32
0233490
DEMCO INC
12/04/97
212.55
0233491
FLORIDA DEPT OF MANAGEMENT
12/04/97
3,325.30
0233492
DICKERSON FLORIDA, INC
12/04/97
874.67
0233493
DICTAPHONE CORPORATION
12/04/97
354.00
0233494
DICTAPHONE CORPORATION
12/04/97
1,845.90
0233495
DIRECTOR, KENNETH L MD PA
12/04/97
300.00
0233496
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS
12/04/97
129.75
0233497
DOBY - SEACOAST S_5PPLY
12/04/97
125.44
0233498
DIXON, PEGGY C
12/04/97
108.50
0233499
DATA SUPPLIES, INC
12/04/97
2,384.75
DECEMBER 16, 1997
-4-
CHECK NAME
CHECK
CHECK
NUMBER
DATE
AMOUNT
0233500 DAVIDSON TITLES, INC
_12/04/97
2,749.73
0233501 DADE PAPER COMPANY
12/04/97
827.11
0233502 DOWNTOWN PRODUCE INC
12/04/97
383.50
0233503 DILLARD, CASSIE
12/04/97
38.63
0233504 DOBECK, STEPHANIE
12/04/97
87.55
0233505 DTN CORPORATION
12/04/97
2,766.00
0233506 ENVIROMETRICS, INC
12/04/97
4,784.00
0233507 EVANS, FLOYD
12/04/97
25.00
0233508 EBSCO SUBSCRIPTION SERVICES
12/04/97
192.08
0233509 E G P, INC
12/04/97
257.00
0233510 EXPRESS REEL GRINDING, INC
12/04/97
7,980.00
0233511 ELPEX, INC
12/04/97
1,455.52
0233512 E D DESIGNER HATS
12/04/97
184.00
0233513 ENGLEHARDT, CHRISSY
12/04/97
38.63
0233514 FLORIDA COCA-COLA BOTTLING CO
12/04/97
584.80
0233515 FLORIDA COURT REPORTERS
12/04/97
25.00
0233516 FLORIDA LEGISLATURE, THE
12/04/97
340.00
0233517 F P & L
12/04/97
21,958.79
0233518 FLORIDA PUBLIC EMPLOYER LABOR
12/04/97
160.00
0233519 FRASER ENGINEERING & TESTING
12/04/97
210.00
0233520 FLOWERS BAKING COMPANY OF
12/04/97
164.86
0233521 FLORIDA LITERACY COLIATION,INC
12/04/97
80.00
0233522 FELLSMERE, CITY OF
12/04/97
52.47
0233523 FALZONE, MATTHEW
12/04/97
38.63
0233524 FLORIDAFFINITY, INC
12/04/97
7,735.00
0233525 FOREST PRESS LAKE
12/04/97
110.00
0233526 FELLSMERE POLICE DEPARTMENT
12/04/97
25.00
0233527 FLORIDA EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS
12/04/97
150.00
0233528 FLOOD, STEPHEN ADAM
12/04/97
30.00
0233529 FRAKER, EVAN
12/04/97
36.05
0233530 FACTS ON FILE
12/04/97
80.13
0233531 FLORIDA CONFERENCE OF CIRCUIT
12/04/97
200.00
0233532 GATOR LUMBER COMPANY
12/04/97
59.58
0233533 GENE'S AUTO GLASS
12/04/97
150.00
0233534 GLIDDEN COMPANY, THE
12/04/97
75.68
0233535 GOODKNIGHT LAWN EQUIPMENT, INC
12/04/97
36.58
0233536 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO INC
12/04/97
219.60
0233537 GROLIER PUBLISHING COMPANY
12/04/97
162.18
0233538 GENE EDWARDS, INC
12/04/97
217.61
0233539 GALLS, INC
12/04/97
285.69
0233540 GOODYEAR AUTO SERVICE CENTER
12/04/97
1,110.46
0233541 GALE RESEARCH, INC
12/04/97
2,462.39
0233542 GREYHOUND LINES, INC
12/04/97
192.00
0233543 GOODYEAR COMMERCIAL TIRE &
12/04/97
1,192.32
0233544 GALLAGHER BASSETT SERVICES INC
12/04/97
1,150.00
0233545 GROVE'S DICTIONARIES, INC
12/04/97
2,600.00
0233546 GANGER, CHARISE
12/04/97
36.05
0233547 GRILL REFILL, INC
12/04/97
53.00
0233548 GLASS, LAURIE
12/04/97
10.30
0233549 HILL DONNELLY CORPORATION
12/04/97
94.65
0233550 HANLEY, MICHAEL J ESQ
12/04/97
450.00
0233551 HAMMOND & SMITH, PA
12/04/97
20.00
0233552 HORNUNG'S PRO GOLF SALES, INC
12/04/97
154.23
0233553 HARRIS SANITATION, INC
12/04/97
46,863.54
0233554 HARTSFIELD, DEBBIE
12/04/97
41.20
0233555 HOWARD JOHNSON EXPRESS INN
12/04/97
228.00
0233556 HARTSFIELD, HENRY
12/04/97
204.00
0233557 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
12/04/97
25.00
0233558 INSTRUMENTATION SERVICES, INC
12/04/97
890.00
0233559 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY UTILITY
12/04/97
594.70
0233560 INDIAN RIVER FARMS WATER
12/04/97
3,215.75
0233561 INGRAM
12/04/97
181.33
0233562 INTERTEC PUBLISHING
12/04/97
86.35
0233563 I B M CORP-DVU
12/04/97
333.50
0233564 IRVINE MECHANICAL, INC
12/04/97
583.17
0233565 IBM CORP-DVV
12/04/97
46.00
0233566 INDIAN RIVER ALL -FAB, INC
12/04/97
143.11
0233567 INSTITUTE OF TRANSPORTATION
12/04/97
198.00
0233568 INSIGHT DIRECT, INC
12/04/97
210.00
0233569 INTERNATIONAL GOLF MANAGEMENT
12/04/97
70,041.67
0233570 IRC EMPLOYEE HEALTH INSURANCE-
12/04/97
102,058.07
0233571 IRON OFFICE SOLUTIONS
12/04/97
252.71
0233572 JONES CHEMICALS, INC
12/04/97
540.00
0233573 K MART
12/04/97
102.89
0233574 KARSTEN MANUFACTURING CORP
12/04/97
353.33
0233575 KIMLEY-HORN & ASSOCIATES, INC
12/04/97
269.57
0233576 KAUFFMANN, ALAN
12/04/97
108.00
0233577 KRUGER CONSTRUCTION CORP
12/04/97
30.00
0233578 KT MOWER & EQUIPMENT
12/04/97
272,99
0233579 KREBS, JILL A
12/04/97
24.13
0233580 LAB SAFETY SUPPLY, INC
12/04/97
416.99
0233581 LIGHT SOURCE BUSINESS SYSTEMS
12/04/97
202.36
0233582 LFI VERO BEACH, INC
12/04/97
1,116.59
DECEMBER 16, 1997
-5-
000 Uij
� , �
CHECK NAME
NUMBER
CHECK
DATE
0233583
LAPSCO INC
12/04/97
0233584
LLOYD, JOHN RALPH
12/04/97
0233585
LITMAN PH,D., GARY W
12/04/97
023358E
LOWE'S HOME CENTERS, INC
12/04/97
0233587
MAXWELL PLUMBING, INC
12/04/97
0233588
MCDONOUGH, WAYNE R ESQ
12/04/97
0233589 MICROFORMS MANAGEMENT CORP
0233590 MIKES GARAGE
0233591 MILLER GOLF COMPANY
0233592 MILNER BUSINESS PRODUCTS, INC
0233593 MUNICIPAL SUPPLY &
0233594 MARQUIS WHO'S WHO
0233595 MARTIN PAVING COMPANY
0233596 MASTELLER & MOLER, INC
0233597 MEDICAL RECORD SERVICES, INC
0233598 M D MOODY & SONS, INC
0233599 MEREDITH CORP, BOOK GROUP
0233600 M G B CONSTRUCTION
0233601 MARTIN COUNTY PETROLEUM
0233602 MIDWEST TAPE EXCHANGE
0233603 M C B COLLECTION SERVICES
0233604 MR BOB PORTABLE TOILET
0233605 MOBLEY, JUNE
0233606 MUNROE REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER
0233607 NORTH SOUTH SUPPLY
0233608 NEFF MACHINERY, INC
0233609 NACVSO
0233610 NACPRO
0233611 N C UTILITY SERVICES
0233612 OFFICE PRODUCTS & SERVICE
0233613 OSBORN, MERLE RN
0233614 ON IT'S WAY
0233615 OFFICE DEPOT, INC
0233616 OSCEOLA PHARMACY
0233617 OCEAN OAKS DENTAL GROUP
0233618 O'NEIL, LEE & WEST
0233619 OUTER BANKS
0233620 PAN AMERICAN ENG CO
0233621 PARKS RENTAL INC
0233622 PETTY CASH
0233623 PITNEY BOWES, INC
0233624 POSTMASTER
0233625 POSTMASTER
0233626 PRIDE OF FLORIDA
0233627 PORT PETROLEUM, INC
0233628 PRESS JOURNAL
0233629 PARLIAMENTARY REPORTING OF
0233630 PELICAN POINTE
0233631 POST, LAURA M
0233632 PEEK TRAFFIC - TRANSYT
0233633 PRIZE POSSESSIONS
0233634 PERKINS MEDICAL SUPPLY
0233635 PANGBURN, TERRI
0233636 PRESS JOURNAL - SUBSCRIPTION
0233637 PAGENET
0233638 PRESS JOURNAL/STUART NEWS
0233639 PRAXAIR DISTRIBUTION SOUTHEAST
0233640 POMEROY COMPUTER RESOURCES
0233641 QUALITY BOOKS, INC
0233642 RADIO SHACK ACCT RECEIVABLE
0233643 RICHARDSON, CALVIN C
0233644 RIFKIN, SHELDON H PHD
0233645 ROBERTS & REYNOLDS PA
0233646 RODEN, GERALD T
0233647 REED ELSEVIER NEW PROVIDENCE
0233648 RANGER CONSTRUCTION IND, INC
0233649 RETHMAN, MARY LOU
0233650 RUBBER STAMP EXPRESS & MORE
0233651 RADKE, PETER
0233652 ROY CLARK
0233653 RENTAL 1
0233654 ROWLEY, ROXANNE
0233655 RADISSON PARKWAY RESORT
0233656 SEARS, ROEBUCK & COMPANY
0233657 SEBASTIAN BUSINESS SUPPLY, INC
0233658 SEWELL HARDWARE CO, INC
0233659 SHELL OIL COMPANY
0233660 SMART CORPORATION
0233661 SOUTHERN CULVERT, DIV OF
0233662 SOUTHERN EAGLE DISTRIBUTING,
0233663 SOUTHERN ELECTRIC SIPPPLY
0233664 SOUTHERN TRUCK EQUIPMENT
0233665 STATE OF FLORIDA
0233666 STURGIS LUMBER & PLYWOOD CO
DECEMBER 16, 1997
12/04/97
12/04/97
12/04/97
12/04/97
12/04/97
12/04/97
12/04/97
12/04/97
12/04/97
12/04/97
12/04/97
12/04/97
12/04/97
12/04/97
12/04/97
12/04/97
12/04/97
12/04/97
12/04/97
12/04/97
12/04/97
12/04/97
12/04/97
12/04/97
12/04/97
12/04/97
12/04/97
12/04/97
12/04/97
12/04/97
12/04/97
12/04/97
12/04/97
12/04/97
12/04/97
12/04/97
12/04/97
12/04/97
12/04/97
12/04/97
12/04/97
12/04/97
12/04/97
12/04/97
12/04/97
12/04/97
12/04/97
12/04/97
12/04/97
12/04/97
12/04/97
12/04/97
12/04/97
12/04/97
12/04/97
12/04/97
12/04/97
12/04/97
12/04/97
12/04/97
12/04/97
12/04/97
12/04/97
12/04/97
12/04/97
12/04/97
12/04/97
12/04/97
12/04/97
12/04/97
12/04/97
12/04/97
12/04/97
12/04/97
12/04/97
12/04/97
12/04/97
12/04/97
-6-
CHECK
AMOUNT
42.50
24.00
3,500.^0
59.'3
157.97
4,559.10
591.75
70.00
198.32
208.00
6,628.00
278.15
209,620.48
5,355.00
13.78
707.85
36.44
500.00
1,271.38
505.05
17.73
152.24
311.83
3,165.84
97.68
173.19
60.00
55.00
137.90
1,248.47
163.00
156.56
944.21
355.67
277.00
9,398.43
686.50
210.00
872.94
179.63
2,767.00
128.00
20,000.00
7,425.00
1,193.47
439.58
363.00
7,974.18
2,555.00
4,585.00
130.68
63.52
48.00
336.00
201.33
259.74
37.01
76.16
75.57
270.56
2,991.00
500.00
29,531.67
735.00
1,575.33
56.97
161.91
7.50
69.20
2,225.00
182.29
15.00
295.00
114.99
318.09
646.89
39.67
36.02
1,345.24
1,069.05
123.27
195.92
9,204.34
356.89
� � r
CHECK
NAME
CHECK
CHECK
NUMBER
DATE
AMOUNT
0233667
SUN COAST CLEANING SUPPLIES,
12/04/97
275.08
0233668
ST LUCIE PAPER & PACKAGING,INC
12/04/97
658.36
0233669
SERVICE REFRIGERATION CO, INC
12/04/97
222.25
0233670
SIMON & SCHUSTER
12/04/97
821.54
0233671
SCHOOL DISTRICT OF IRC
12/04/97
1,ODO.00
0233672
SKAGGS, PAUL MD
12/04/97
20.06
0233673
SOUTHERN SEWER EQUIPMENT SALES
12/04/97
159.00
0233674
SPALDING
12/04/97
1,143.90
0233675
SOFTHAUS COMPUTER CENTER, INC
12/04/97
200.00
0233676
SUPERIOR PRINTING
12/04/97
1,213.40
0233677
SYSCO FOOD SERVICES OF
12/04/97
1,177.96
0233678
STEWART INDUSTRIES
12/04/97
900.07
0233679
STEVENS PRINTING
12/04/97
127.00
0233680
SCHWEY SERVICES
12/04/97
462.00
0233681
SYSTEMATIC SERVICES, INC
12/04/97
5,413.64
0233682
SOUTHERN LOCK AND SUPPLY CO
12/04/97
86.90
0233683
ST JOHNS RIVER WATER MGMT DIST
12/04/97
3,000.00
0233684
SUMMERLIN'S SEVEN SEAS
12/04/97
58,640.00
0233685
SKALA, ERIC
12/04/97
15.45
0233686
SPORTSTURF
12/04/97
40.00
0233687
SOUTHERN SECURITY SYSTEMS OF
12/04/97
180.00
0233688
SUNSHINE STATE ONE CALL
12/04/97
451.71
0233689
SEPCO-SOLAR ELECTRIC POWER CO
12/04/97
1,950.00
0233690
SFNN
12/04/97
100.80
0233691
SAMPLE, PETER & CECILIA
12/04/97
10.00
0233692
SEIKO INSTRUMENT USA INC
12/04/97
46.90
0233693
SAFETY ZONE SPECIALISTS INC
12/04/97
879.00
0233694
THOMAS, DEBBY L
12/04/97
35.00
0233695
TIME -LIFE EDUCATION, INC
12/04/97
21.75
0233696
TITLEIST DRAWER
12/04/97
3,832.23
0233697
TREASURE COAST CONTRACTING,SNC
12/04/97
25,794.00
0233698
TECHNOLOGY PARTNERS
12/04/97
1,374.00
0233699
TIPPIN, JOHN W
12/04/97
283.50
0233700
TEXACE CORP
12/04/97
1,238.96
0233701
TONY'S CARPET & UPHOLSTERY
12/04/97
288.00
0233702
TCI MEDIA SERVICES
12/04/97
100.00
0233703
TATTEGRAIN, RAYMOND
12/04/97
37.50
0233704
TRI -COUNTY GAS
12/04/97
32.46
0233705
TARGET STORE T-1050
12/04/97
90.00
0233706
SMITH, TERRY L
12/04/97
74.13
0233707
TRAVEL HUB
12/04/97
447.00
0233708
TROTMAN, MICHAEL
12/04/97
36.05
0233709
UNIVERSAL SIGNS & ACCESSORIES
12/04/97
63.15
0233710
US FILTER DISTRIBUTION GROUP
12/04/97
10,156.54
0233711
UPCHURCH WATSON WHITE &
12/04/97
9,020.40
0233712
USA BLUEBOOK
12/04/97
560.05
0233713
VELDE FORD, INC
12/04/97
1,246.97
0233714
VERO BEACH, CITY OF
12/04/97
37,034.69
0233715
VERO LAWNMOWER CENTER, INC
12/04/97
126.45
0233716
VETROL DATA SYSTEMS, INC
12/04/97
358.40
0233717
VITUNAC, CHARLES P
12/04/97
90.40
0233718
VERO BEACH POLICE DEPARTMENT
12/04/97
35.00
0233719
VERO BEARING & BOLT
12/04/97
297,52
0233720
VERO BEACH POWERTRAIN
12/04/97
168.33
0233721
VERO BEACH THEATRE GUILD
12/04/97
395.00
0233722
VOLUNTEER ACTION COMMITTEE
12/04/97
25.00
0233723
VERO BEACH, CITY OF
12/04/97
2,614.00
0233724
WAL-MART STORES, INC
12/04/97
217.77
0233725
WALSH, LYNN
12/04/97
58.20
0233726
WEST PUBLISHING PAYMENT CTR
12/04/97
170.45
0233727
WOODY'S PAPER & PRINT
12/04/97
161.10
0233728
WAL-MART PHARMACY, INC
12/04/97
141.94
0233729
WQOL FM
12/04/97
430.00
0233730
WAL-MART PHARMACY, INC
12/04/97
146.44
0233731
WILLHOFF, PATSY
12/04/97
234.00
0233732
WM THIES & SONS, INC
12/04/97
444.80
0233733
WHEELER, GARY SHERIFF
12/04/97
5,506.83
0233734
WABASSO GOLF
12/04/97
300.00
0233735
WORLDWATCH LIBRARY
12/04/97
30.00
0233736
WPAW RADIO
12/04/97
200.00
0233737
WOLFE, MEGAN
12/04/97
33.48
0233738
WALGREENS PHARMACY
12/04/97
131.77
0233739
WRAP N' SHIP
12/04/97
51.60
0233740
WBBE-FM
12/04/97
200.00
0233741
WORLD ALMANAC EDUCATION
12/04/97
17.49
0233742
WEST GROUP PAYMENT CTR
12/04/97
70.00
0233743
WOLFE, ERIN
12/04/97
33.48
0233744
YAVORSKY'S TRUCK SERVICE,INC
12/04/97
39.24
0233745
MATHERNE, DENNIS
12/04/97
58.80
0233746
PEARSALL, A
12/04/97
54.36
0233747
TOZZOLO BROTHERS
12/04/97
29.60
0233748
POFFENBERGER, JOHN
12/04/97
52.44
DECEMBER 16, 1997
DECEMBER 16, 1997
-8-
CHECK
NAME
CHECK
CHECK
NUMBER
DATE
AMOUNT
0233749
FIELDS, STEPHEN
12/04/97
25.51
0233750
BRANDON CAPITAL CORP
12/04/97
132.02
0233751
HARTLEY, EVA
12/04/97
42.81
0233752
DAVIS, MIRIAM
12/04/97
52.88
0233753
GRAND HARBOR
12/04/97
79.98
0233754
R ZORC & SONS BUILDERS, INC
12/04/97
74.08
0233755
STOLLE CORP
12/04/97
86.68
0233756
FLITCH, MARION
12/04/97
12.13
0233757
MASSONI, SANDRA A
12/04/97
57.18
0233758
PROCTOR CONSTRUCTION CO INC
12/04/97
71.74
-
0233759
BELL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT
12/04/97
29.83
0233760
GARONE, JOSEPH
12/04/97
80.96
0233761
STEWART, DAVID
12/04/97
58.64
0233762
WEBB JR, VAN V
12/04/97
24.81
0233763
HOLIDAY BUILDERS
12/04/97
49.69
0233764
MASLANKA, MICHAEL
12/04/97
19.48
0233765
RENO, THOMAS M
12/04/97
37.09
0233766
MESENBOURG, THOMAS L
12/04/97
19.22
0233767
SMITH P E, TODD N
12/04/97
40.07
0233768
HAYES, BRENDA
12/04/97
71.24
0233769
WILLIAMS, NATHANIEL & DIANE
12/04/97
23.65
0233770
ZULLO, ROSE E
12/04/97
21.70
0233771
FOX, LOREN C
12/04/97
61.68
0233772
NICHOLS, TOMMY & BRENDA
12/04/97
48.99
0233773
PELTOLA, DEBRA L
12/04/97
70.27
0233774
TARR, JEANETTE
12/04/97
75.67
0233775
AUTREY, CONNIE S
12/04/97
50.78
0233776
MARSHALL, QUEEN
12/04/97
28.17
0233777
BANHAGEL, JAMES & CHRISTINE
12/04/97
39.43
0233778
THOMAS, DAWNA E
12/04/97
35.18
0233779
GHO VERO BEACH, INC
12/04/97
65.95
0233780
OSBORNE, LINDA K
12/04/97
25.14
0233781
COLLEY, LATOIA N
12/04/97
2.25
0233782
GULF STATES BEAUTY STORES
12/04/97
71.70
0233783
CORNERSTONE SELECT HOMES, INC
12/04/97
142.28
0233784
CEPEDA, ANNA M
12/04/97
28.43
0233785
PARTINGTON, ARLINE J
12/04/97
33.51
0233786
WINSOR, RICHARD
12/04/97
21.30
0233787
MGB CONSTRUCTION, INC
12/04/97
36.25
0233788
PERUGINI CONSTRUCTION
12/04/97
43.41
0233789
STEPHENS, JAMES R
12/04/97
54.75
0233790
VISONE, JOE
12/04/97
94.83
0233791
HARRIS, IRENE L
12/04/97
220.82
0233792
VAN SICKLE, MARVIN A
12/04/97
77.49
0233793
LAMPKIN JR, LAWRENCE B
12/04/97
77.31
0233794
CLARK, THOMAS M
12/04/97
12.01
0233795
LARGE, G C JACK
12/04/97
17.87
0233796
WOJCIECHOWSKI, EDWARD G
12/04/97
44.96
0233797
ALTENHOFF, SVEN V
12/04/97
69.29
0233798
KNIGHT, RONALD L
12/04/97
40.99
0233799
ANDERSON, DEBRA
12/04/97
38.49
0233800
HOVDE, GLEN
12/04/97
65.84
0233801
BARKWELL-ROONEY, BRENDA J
12/04/97
20.38
0233802
SIMPSON, GLADYS J
12/04/97
18.76
0233803
NEWBOLD, THELMA
12/04/97
14.20
0233804
BRISTOL, YOLANDA
12/04/97
45.85
0233805
KAVERMAN, RACHEL & JOHN
12/04/97
26.71
0233806
PERAGINE, MICHAEL
12/04/97
37.70
0233807
GARRETT, TRACEY
12/04/97
4.17
0233808
ANDREWS SR, JOSEPH T
12/04/97
63.01
0233809
WOUTERS, MICHELE
12/04/97
14.77
0233810
GARBELLINI, JOE & JEANNE
12/04/97
3.18
0233811
WHITE, RHONDA A
12/04/97
8.62
0233812
DENNING, CYNTHIA
12/04/97
27.50
0233813
RUBIN, MARK S
12/04/97
50.56
0233814
TULKOFF, PRICILLA G
12/04/97
50.97
0233815
PAYNE, ELIZABETH A
12/04/97
56.31
0233816
ANDREWS, BRETT
12/04/97
52.22
0233817
BERGSTRESSER, JACK D
12/04/97
41.69
0233818
FOREST, PATRICIA
12/04/97
27.63
0233819
BETA CONSTRUCTION
12/04/97
311.98
0233820
WILEN, RANDALL C
12/04/97
47.54
0233821
CRAVEN, DANIELLE J
12/04/97
38.83
0233822
DUBRET, JOHN
12/04/97
14.07
0233823
ABBOTT, REBECCA
12/04/97
14.72
0233824
FIRST NATIONAL BANK
12/04/97
74.10
0233825
THOMAS, BEVERLEY
12/04/97
14.12
0233826
BROWN, DONALD R
12/04/97
42.43
0233827
HAY, CHRISTOPHER
12/04/97
37.13
0233828
GREEN, BYRUSS
12/04/97
8.31
0233829
FIORI, JAMES F
12/04/97
33.15
0233830
REGAN, SHERRY & JACK
12/04/97
22.07
0233831
TOYS R US
12/04/97
345.00
0233832
STUDER, JAMES E & DORIS G
12/04/97
42.65
DECEMBER 16, 1997
-8-
CHECK
NAME
CHECK
CHECK
NUMBER
DATE
AMOUNT
0233833
INTZEGIAN, ARTIN & EMELDA
12/04/97
18.73
0233834
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY
12/04/97
42.92
0233835
LANG, CHARLES E
12/04/97
99.99
0233836
FINKLESTEIN, MAX J
12/04/97
76.73
0233837
W G MILLS, INC OF BRADENTON
12/04/97
132.84
0233838
KIRBY, BRIAN
12/04/97
42.92
0233839
S C H EQUITIES
12/04/97
5.05
0233840
STRUNK, DOROTHY H
12/04/97
25.90
0233841
GINRICH, MARY
12/04/97
10.35
0233842
MONTELIONE, GIUSEPPE/IVANILDE
12/04/97
100.00
0233843
BRISTOL, YOLANDA
12/04/97
30.77
0233844
R ZORC & SONS BUILDERS INC
12/04/97
15.58
995,207.34
7.0 HAMMOCKLAKES SUBDIVISION- MODIFICATION TO PLANNED
DEVELOPMENT PRELIMINA R Y PLAT - PLAN CONDITION OF
APPROVAL
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of December 10, 1997:
TO: James E. Chandler
County Administrator
DIVISION HEAD CONCURRENCE:
A
it
Robert M. Keating, AIC j
Community Development Direct
10
THROUGH: Stan Boling, AICP
Planning Director
FROM: Eric Blady(;
Staff Plamildr, Current Development
DATE: December 10, 1997
SUBJECT: Hammock Lakes Subdivision Modification to a Planned Development Preliminary
Plat/Plan Condition of Approval
This report is submitted to advise the Board of County Commissioners of action taken by the
Community Development Director to approve a request to modify a condition of preliminary plat
approval for a planned development known as Hammock Lakes Subdivision.
DESCRIPTION AND CONDMONS:
At its meeting of September 14, 1995, the Planning and Zoning Commission approved the preliminary
phulplan and made a recommendation to the Board of County Commissioners to approve the planned
development (PD) special exception use request for the subject project. The Board granted PD
special exception use approval on September 28, 1995, and by that action made effective the project's
preliminary plat/plan and condition approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission.
At its regular meeting of September 4, 1997 the Board granted final plat approval for Phase 1 of
Hammock Lakes Subdivision and authorized the chairman to execute the contract for construction
of required improvements and accept security to guarantee the contract for construction. As a
condition of preliminary plat approval, the developer is required to pave 1st Street S.W. from 58th
Avenue to 43rd Avenue in accordance with an executed agreement between the developer and the
county prior to the issuance of any certificate of occupancy within the project. The applicant
requested of staff (see attachment #1) to amend that condition to allow the issuance of a certificate
DECEMBER 16, 1997
-9-
s'ira
of occupancy for lots 4, 5, 29, 33, and 19 prior to the completion of the 1st Street S.W. paving
between 58th Avenue and 43rd Avenue, provided 1st Street S.W. is paved from the entry of
Hammock Lakes to 58th•Avenue.
The county attorney's office has advised planning staff tbat, since the requested modifioation is minor
and pertains to a condition of preliminary plat approval and not the special exception use granted by
the Board, the requested condition may be approved at staff level by the Community Development
Director. The Community Development Director has approved the requested modification to the 1 st
Street S.W. condition of preliminary plat approval. No further action is necessary by the Board.
ANALYSIS:
The applicant's request has been reviewed by planning, engineering, and traffic engineering staff.
Although the developer agreed to construct the entire length of 1st Street S.W. between 58th Avenue
and 43rd Avenue, the LDRs allow for some lots to be developed with a paved connection from the
subdivision to 58th Avenue via 1st Street S.W. Therefore, staff had no objections to amending the
preliminary plat condition for the paving of 1st Street S.W. to treat lots 4, 5, 19, 23, and 33 as a
separate phase to allow for the issuance of certificates of occupancy for homes on these lots prior to
completion of 1 st Street S.W. paving between 58th Avenue and 43rd Avenue, provided that a portion
of 1st Street S.W. between the entry of Hammock Lakes and 58th Avenue are paved.
Even though the modification to the Hammock Lakes preliminary plat condition for the paving of 1 st
Street S.W. is minor in relation to the approved preliminary plat, staff wanted to notify the Board
of County Commissioners, since the project is a PD project that had been reviewed by the Board.
RECOMMENDATION:
No action required.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Tippin,
SECONDED by Commissioner Ginn, the Board, by
a 4-0 vote (Commissioner Adams being absent)
unanimously approved the amendment of the
preliminary plat condition for the paving of l' Street
SW to treat Lots 4, 5, 19, 23 and 33 as a separate
phase to allow for the issuance of certificates of
occupancy for homes on these lots prior to
completion of I' Street SW paving between 58'
Avenue and 43`d Avenue, provided that a portion of
1' Street SW between the entry of Hammock Lakes
and 58' Avenue are paved, pursuant to staff's
recommendations.
DECEMBER 16, 1997
-10-
ZD. BID #8021-129", STREET WA TER MAIN EXTENSION- TREASURE
COAST CONTRACTING
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of December 8, 1997:
DATE: December 8, 1997
TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
THRU: James E. Chandler, County Administrator
H. T. "Sonny' Dean, Direct
General Services
FROM: Fran Boynton Powell, Purchasing Manager
SUBJ: Award Bid #8021 /129th Street Water Main Extension
Utilities Department
BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
Bid Opening Date:
Advertising Dates:
Notice of Bid Mailed to:
Number of Responses:
VENDOR
Treasure Coast Contracting
Vero Beach, FL
Forest Hill Construction
Wellington, FL
Johnson -Davis Inc
Lantana, FL
Maxwell Construction
Cocoa, FL
Sheltra & Son
Indiantown, FL
Martin Paving
Vero Beach, FL
October 29, 1997
Sept 25, Oct 2, 9, 1997
Thirty Fight (38) Vendors
Six (6) Vendors
BID TOTAL CORRECTED TOTAL
$ 59,929.90
$ 70,730.00
$ 72,430.00
$ 77,000.00
$ 83,781.00
$ 124,530.00
TOTAL AMOUNT OF BID $ 59,930.30
SOURCE OF FUNDS Utilities Department Assessment Funds
473-000-169-293.00 & 473-000-169-335.00
ESTIMATED BUDGET $ 64,079.00
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the bid be awarded to Treasure Coast
Contracting as the lowest, most responsive and responsible bidder
meeting specifications as set forth in the Invitation to Bid.
In addition, staff request Board approval of the attached Agreement, as
to form, when requirements are met and approved by the County
Attorney. -
DECEMBER 16, 1997
Epi F- t 7X)
Commissioner Ginn questioned the wide discrepancy between the low and high
bids, and Chairman Eggert responded that the contractors who bid extremely high usually
don't want the job.
Capital Projects Engineer Bill McCain explained that the low bid is very close to
the cost estimate and those contractors bidding too high really did not want the job.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Ginn, SECONDED
by Commissioner Tippin, the Board, by a 4-0 vote
(Commissioner Adams being absent) unanimously
awarded Bid #8021 to Treasure Coast Contracting,
as recommended by staff.
BID DOCUMENTS VffiMME ON FILE IN THE
OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
7.E. OUT -OF -COUNTY TRAVEL -1998 NACO LEGISLATIVE CONFERENCE
-FEBRUARY 27THROUGHMARCH3, 1998
The Board reviewed the following information:
NACo 1998
Legislative Conference
February 27 - March 3, 1998
Moyers to report on addiction program
Budget, preemption,
tobacco lawsuit among
issues planned for exciting conference!
Mark your calendar,
the 1998 Lgislatfve Conference promises to
be an exciting conference that will cover the critical
issues affecting counties and their citizens.
Key Washington dectsionmakers —President Clinton,
Vice President Gore, members of the Clinton Cabinet
and the leadership from Congress —
wiU be invited to speak at the conference.
DECEMBER 16, 1997
Budget agreement
Tbs year's latdnmark kderaal budget agreement sets a Nuepnint that v6A
affect aountiesin die years toam. Pteserrawnswill mom the questions:
"What does the budget agreement mean kir counties!"
Tobacco lawsuit
NACo is working to ensure that counties have a role in the $368
billion proposed tobacco settlement. Counties spend millions of dol.
lars on tobacco -related illnesses. Legislation will heat up in the spring.
Preemption
The federal government acormlennga number of issues which take
authority away fion state and local guvemments The conference will
kxos on three major preemption issues: Internet sales; tax, electricity.
deregulation and Federal Communications Contnitdum rulings.
Other critical issues
Other issues that will be covered are UK welfare reform,
workforce development, juvenile justice, rural development, hous•
ing western lands issues and environmental concerns.
Visit Congress
In addition to the speakers and the more than 40 workshops, you
will have the opportunity to visit your congressional delegation. Call
202/114-3121 to schedule meetings to discuss NACo legislative pri•
orities. as well as your county's specific needs.
Close to Home: A Aloyers Report on Addiction
The conference will feature a presentation by veteran television
journalist Bill Moyers, who will discuss how county government can
play a role in PBS's upcoming documentary on drug addiction and
recovery, enitled Moyers On Addiction: Ckse To Home.
-12-
ON MOTION by Commissioner Tippin,
SECONDED by Commissioner Ginn, the Board, by
a 4-0 vote (Commissioner Adams being absent)
unanimously approved out -of -county travel for any
Commissioner wishing to attend the NACo 1998
Legislative Conference.
9.A. PUBLIC HEARINGS
9.A.1. ZUCKERMAN VS. INDIANRIVER COUNTY- CLAIMS
SETTLEMENT
PRESS -JOURNAL
Puwmed cony
Vera "GA. Indian RI~ County, Florida
COMY QF WD" RIVER: STATE OF FWRmA
Betcre the rsxlereigrted a ft4 PMsc 4 appeared D" K. iIlaM who on
oath says mat he is Preawem of are Press+lotarml, a tlefly,rwspaper pubsstted at Vera Beach
Man Ricer Casty. Ftorwa: mat the etfeetied copy of etl�rtieentertt,tg
a Y'w�E.c c
ntnamatmrot,C�e✓/'i'1—
h th�er� I Q Corti W" �
Bshed In aaia nwmM er In me lasues of L. 1� �T l - l(} -?
Atfim hovw says to the said Presa,larnal is a new mper pubbhed at Vero Beach, In
SW Won ftw C &um* Rhea in 8W � R� mat the oda wnrapeper ices Wenn wm been
senna class mss matter at the pmt office in Y� � in Ola Mw daly WO Me � eM«aa as
f« tOf am a year r ecea me trot p umuon m ma atter oopor
« axporetwn any disoaed. reba�oom�sboar ltd Mrtl MMM r w m8 firm
rgdra �« pubYcation m saw rtervspaper. g nYs
••.•�P1Y
ariG'nu(aNN g§ LI e l
�ibdrii to cNped betas me a+w
a ��ro *
9 •_ .a r
DECEMBER 16, 1997
MY�MGo U Exp. Jan. 01, 2001
Panonaly Knam 0092« Produced ID 0
Ty" of 10 Produced
-13-
PUBLIC NOTICE
Pursuatd to Sedion 164.106, Flor- i
Ida Statutes, notice is hereby given
that Mee claim of Ramona Zucker-
man against Indian River County
Board of Courtly Commiuioners,
Indian River County, Florida hos
been settled f«'15,000.00.
Dec. 4, 1997 1217669r
rLi`' gF.
t0: K U PAGE
600K 10i FAGL � "
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of November 26, 1997:
TO: Board of County Commissioners
THRU: James E. Chandler, County Administrator
FROM: Beth Jordan, Risk Manager_,
DATE: 26 November 1997
SUBJECT: Public Hearing; Zuckerman vs. Indian River County
On November 25, 1997, the staff Claims Review Committee met to discuss the claim of Romana
Zuckerman.
Background
On October 15, 1995, Mrs. Zuckerman, then 33 years old, was injured in a two -vehicle accident at the
Intersection of 86th Avenue and 49th Street. A copy of the Florida Highway Patrol's Florida Traffic Crash
Report is attached. The plaintiffs husband, Alan, was charged with violation of right of way after driving his
car into the path of an oncoming vehicle.
Analysis
William Frates, Mrs. Zuckerman's attorney, made an initial demand of $75,000.00. On November 10,
Lyman Reynolds, defense counsel.. and I participated in mediation with Gene Roddenberry, mediator, the
plaintiff, her husband, and Mr. Fnates, who acknowledged that his client's husband was as much as 50%
responsible for the accident He maintained, however, that the County was at least 50% liable based upon
weeftgrasses which blocked Mr. Zudkemnan's sight distance. We have determined that Road S Bridge
maintains the shoulders of this intersection and had art the grass up to the canal guardrail, a distance of
approximately 9 % feet from the edge of pavement. Our accident reconstruction expert witness has advised
this is not a dear case for either party, bid one which could have been explained to a jury. The grass behind
the guardrail, growing directly along the canal bank, was overgrown and photographs taken by the plaintiffs
mother on the date of the accident show this condition.
At the mediation conference, Mr. Reynolds and staff held firm that this claim is not valued at over $15,000.00
for settlement purposes and that we could not recommend a higher amount to the County. The claims
review process, including public hearing before the Board of County Commissioners, was explained to the
plaintiff. This claim was scheduled for the December 8 trial docket After a few hours, Mrs. Zuckerman
agreed to our final offer.
The Claims Review Committee unanimously approved the mediated settlement based upon the following
fads. There was sigriftant Impact to Ants. Zuckerman's vehicle as evidenced by the attached photographs.
She has approximately $13,500.00 remaining in outstanding medical bilis atter payments by both her auto
insurer and group health insurer. Additionally, she continues to incur costa for a pain management clinic,
faces possible surgery, and has temporomandibular joint (TMJ) injury. Despite the fact that the water
management district owns the canal along 66th Avenue, the County has responsibility to maintain sight
distance and has traditionally maintained the roadways adjacent to canals. The County had received two
complaints about overgrown weeds at this intersection, and through a miscommunication, alt the weeds at
a nearby intersection but not at this one just prior to the accident.
Recommendation
This mediated settlement Is within the settlement authority of the Staff Claims Review Committee. In
keeping with the Boards desire that all such settlements appear as public items, it has been publicly noticed
and is being placed on this agenda.
DECEMBER 16, 1997
-14-
Attorney Lyman Reynolds, the County's trial counsel, presented the matter to the
The Chairman opened the public hearing and asked if anyone wished to be heard
regarding this matter. There being none, the Chairman closed the public hearing.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Ginn, SECONDED
by Commissioner Tippin, the Board, by a 4-0 vote
(Commissioner Adams being absent) unanimously
approved the mediated settlement with Romana
Zuckerman, as recommended.
9.A.2. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT
(CDB(i) APPLICATION AMENDMENTS
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
Indian River County will conduct a public hearing on the
CDBG Neighborhood - Revitalization Grant Project
(CDBG 97DB-3K-1040-01-N27) to discuss changes in the
T6. -T-097 at 9:05 a.m. at a� t -&an T VEr ounty Commission
Chambers, 1840 25th Street, Vero Beach, Florida. Quer
c Works birector at (561} 567-8000 Ext. 245.
EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER
HANDICAPPED ASSISTANCE PROVIDED
P.O.AI I
Box 1268 Vero Beach.• •• 3296 1 562-2315
COUNTY OF 04IMM RIVER: STATE OF FLORIDA
Before the undersigned authority personally appeared Darryl K.
Hicks who on oath says that he is President of the Press -Journal, a
daily newspaper Published at Vero Bead in Indian River County,
Florida; t
J1-.1ffiJW1F 4-11
X43
billed to11
was published in sg{d newspaper in the issue(s) of
1897 a,)) l ? A
Sworn to
and subscribed b7efore me this
....�14E-. �,f '.�.el a
_ President
_Y AN~FB
50It,m :� L KIMBERLYANWE
¢ Aftwal not Notary Po01ir, State of norma
;g: t �t[ltlfh2 rte: MycommissWExp Jae:01.2001
c p L`0MM N*. cc 611092
PeisondIyVA"A LloprodtxedlD t3
Ty9s of 10 Proaaood
DECEMBER 16, 1997
-15- -7--
&09K U Fart d e
L
F'r-
boo �,� ab
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of December 8, 1997:
TO: James E. Chandler
County Administrator
DEP RTMENT HEAD CONCURRENCE
Obert Ki. Keating, AIC /J
THROUGH: Sasan Rohani, AICP> .
Chief, Long -Range Planning
FROM: Peter J. Radke .
Economic Development Planner
DATE: December 8, 1997
RE: Amendments to Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Application
It is requested that the data herein presented be given formal consideration by the Board of County
Commissioners at its regular meeting of December 16, 1997.
DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS
In August 1996, Indian River County's Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) application
was approved by the State Department of Community Affairs. The purpose of the grant is to provide
for street and drainage improvements, water line extensions, and water connections to the Colored
School and Whitfield subdivisions in the Wabasso area. A $750,000 CDBG was awarded to Indian
River County to complete the aforementioned activities. In addition, the county committed $60,000
to the roadway and drainage improvements.
To assist very low and low income households of both subdivisions with the cost of connecting to
the county water system, County SHIP loans are available to eligible households. As part of the
CDBG application, Indian River County pledged $200,000 from County SHIP funds to be used by
households in the CDBG project area. These funds will be distributed as deferred payment, low
interest loans (0% annual interest rate for very low income households and 3% annual interest rate
for low income persons). With the SHIP loans, qualified applicants have the option of paying back
the loans through a monthly payment schedule that is appropriate for their budget. The SHIP loans
are available to qualified applicants to pay water impact fees and any needed plumbing system
repairs. All other costs (line extension, fire hydrants, meters, service lines, road paving, and drainage
improvements) will be paid with CDBG funds.
In the past seven months, County staff have organized and attended three community meetings
(04/29/97, 07/28/97, and 10/28/97) and three application workshops (06/20/97, 07/30/97, and
09/16/97) to inform residents ofthe project and to assist residents with the various application forms.
Despite this effort, there has been a low response rate for completing CDBG water connection forms
and applying for SHIP loans.
On November 25, 1997, the CDBG Citizen Advisory Task Force voted 2-0 to recommend that the
Board of County Commissioners approve the CDBG application amendments identified below.
ANALYSIS
On October 8, 1997. the CDBG project was awarded to the lowest bidder, Martin Paving Co. of
Sebastian. Since the bid for the CDBG scope of work came in below the CDBG approved funding,
the budget needs to be adjusted to match the bid of Martin Paving Co.. The proposed revised budget
is identified below:
DECEMBER 16, 1997
-16-
Activity
Current Budget
Proposed Budget
Revision
Street Improvements
$239,850
$338,400
($98,550)
Fire Hydrants
$22,000
$17,600
$4,400
Potable Water Facilities
$285,150
$180,000
$105,150
Water Hook-ups
$42,000
$59,000
($17,000)
Engineering
$104,000
$98,000
$6,000
Administration
$57,000
$57,000
$0
Total Grant
$750,000
$750,000
To date, the county has received and processed 20 SHIP applications related to the CDBG project.
Those 20 applications represent only $26,000 in SHIP funds. Given the low response rate for SHIP
loans, it is anticipated that the $200,000 in SHIP funds originally committed to the CDBG project
will not be fully utilized. Therefore, the CDBG project budget should be amended to reflect the
$26,000 of SHIP loans that the county has processed.
At the time of the grant application, the number of housing units that would qualify for a free water
connection, using CDBG funds, was estimated based on a household survey. Since the grant has
been funded, a 100% survey has been conducted. At this time, 56 households have submitted the
required documentation and. therefore, will qualify for a free water connection compared to the grant
estimated 84 households. Therefore, the number of households being connected as part of the grant
will need to be revised. Since the number of housing units being assisted is being revised, the
number of people living in the housing units as reported to the grant agency will also need to be
revised.
Lowering the SHIP allocation or number of qualified households in the project area will not prohibit
other households in the project area from applying for SHIP funds and/or CDBG qualification. The
county does have the ability to increase the SHIP allocation and/or number of qualified households
without the need for a formal amendment to the CDBG application.
Based on the analysis conducted, staff and the CDBG Citizen Advisory Task Force recommend that
the Board of County Commissioners approve the amendments to Indian River County's CDBG
application.
Community Development Director Bob Keating introduced Robert Johnson, of
Clark, Roumelis & Associates, the County's CDBG consultant.
Chairman Eggert questioned whether the problem of the one owner who thought
she was not receiving a hydrant had been solved.
Robert Johnson, CDBG consultant, replied that had been taken care of. 56
households have qualified and the grant will be reduced to 56 connections. However,
connections can still be made after the cutoff date.
DECEMBER 16, 1997
L
!tX!Jti!17\ �Y�d�N. 7
The Chairman opened the public hearing and asked if anyone wished to be heard
regarding this matter. There being none, the Chairman closed the public hearing.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Ginn, SECONDED
by Commissioner Tippin, the Board, by a 4-0 vote
(Commissioner Adams being absent) unanimously
approved the amendments to Indian River County's
CDBG application, as recommended by staff.
APPLICATION DOCUMENTS WILL BE ON FILE
IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
WHEN EXECUTED AND RECEIVED
9.A.3. PROPOSED LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS
(LDj AMENDMENTS - FINAL HEARING
n.� a
P.O. Box 4268 Vero Bepch, Flodda 32964 . 562-2345
FIN Wiroo Journal
COUNTY OF INDIAN RIVER: STATE OF FLORIDA
Before the undersigned authority personally appeared Darryl IL
Iflelts who on oath says that he Is dent of the Prrsv-Journal, a
daily ne� per published at Vero Beach in Indian Ever County,
FloA
z
was published in said nqy paper in the issue(s) of
Sworn to and subscribed before me this
11%aay
�........ - �President
�pUY SNF , � 7GiC.fti�
*;•(fIOYRIItEs'.�t pp18ERLYANNE LAIS
LWaq'Ot.7ppl Notary Public. State of Florida
(sYtIMtLI(f11G9t :ct MYcommiesionE:W-Ian.01.2001
9 : ; c • comm. No. CC 611092
••�,, •. OQt Poraonafly Known or Produced ID Cl
.cn w ��r•. STA1;E�:•' Type Otto Produaod �.•
DECEMBER 16, 1997
-18-
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
NOTICE OF AMENDMENT TO LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS
(LDRS) CHANGING THE LIST OF PERMITTED USES WITHIN THE A-1,
A-2. A-3, PRO, OCR, CN, CL, AND CG ZONING DISTRICTS, AND
AMENDING THE FOLLOWING CHAPTERS OF THE LAND
DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS (LDRS). CHAPTER 911, ZONING;
CHAPTER 917, ACCESSORY USES AND STRUCTURES, CHAPTER 926,
LANDSCAPE AND BUFFER REGULATIONS; CHAPTER 932, COASTAL
MANAGEMENT; CHAPTER 952, TRAFFIC; CHAPTER 971,
REGULATIONS FOR SPECIFIC LAND USE CRITERIA, AND PROVIDING
FOR REPEAL OF CONFLICTING PROVISIONS, CODIFICATION,
SEVERABILITY AND EFFECTIVE DATE.
THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER
COUNTY, FLORIDA PROPOSES TO ADOPT AN ORDINANCE
AMENDING PERMITTED USES ALLOWED WITHIN THE A-), A-2, A-3,
PRO, OCR, CN, C, AND CG ZONING DISTRICTS. THESE AND
OTHER AMENDMENTS WILL BE CONSIDERED FOR ADOPTION, AS
FOLLOWS:
ceasing landscaping requirements countywide
1. In and clarifying Ping
for new development and redevelopment projects (Chapters
911 and 926).
2. Clarifying commercial nursery and greenhouse uses in agricul-
tural araau restrtcti such uses to cultivation and wholesaling
activities (Chapter 9111.
3. Specifying standards for minimum allowable driving aisle
widths for drive -up window facilities (Chapter 952).
4. Establishing setback standards for dumping and spreading fruit
(e.g. citrus) onag ricultl properties (Chapters 911 and 917).
S. Specifyingg stahhdaumrds for uses that consist primarily of office
uses but have other accessory uses (Chapters 911 and 917).
6. Corrections to scrivener's errors and inadvertent omissions in
existing ordinance sections (Chapters 911 and 971).
7. Specifying that the county.s coastal management ordinance
sections 932.06 and 932.09 (e.g. seawall permitting) appy to
oceanfront propsrties in the City of Vero Beach (Chapter 932).
A PUBLIC HEARING ON THE ORDINANCE AMENDING USES
WITHIN THE A-1, A-2, A-3, PRO, OCR, CN, CL, AND CG ZONING
DISTRICTS, AND THE OTHER DESCRIBED AMENDMENTS, WILL BE
HELD ON MONDAY, DECEMBER 1, 1997 AT 5:01 P.M. AND ON
TUESDAY, DECEMBER 16, 1997 AT 9:05 A.M. AT THE BOARD OF
COUNTY COMMISSIONERS CHAMBERS, 1840 25th STREET, VERO
BEACH, FLORIDA. A COPY OF THE PROPOSED ORDINANCE WILL BE
AVAILABLE FOR THE PUBLIC BEGINNING NOVEMBER 25, 1997, IN
THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS IN THE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION BUILDING
LOCATED AT 1840 25th STREET, VERO BEACH, FLORIDA. CITIZENS
SHALL HAVE AN OPPORTUNITY TO BE HEARD AT THE PUBLIC
HEARINGS.
THE PROPOSED ORDINANCE, IF ADOPTED, WOULD BE EFFECTIVE
IN THE UNINCORPORATED AREA OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, AS
DEPICTED ON THE LOCATION MAP SHOWN BELOW.
umuo mu own. ::u,oaV W�:oO uu
Please direct planning -related questions to the current
development planning section at 567- 8000, ext. 242.
Anyone who may wish to appeal any decision which may be
made at this meting will need to ensure that a verbatim record of
the proceedings is made, which includes testimony and evidence
upon which the appeal is based.
ANYONE WHO NEEDS A SPECIAL ACCOMMODATION FOR THIS
MEETING MUST CONTACT THE COUNTY'S AMERICANS WITH
DISABILITIES ACT (ADA) COORDINATOR AT 56741000 X223 AT
LEAST 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE OF THE MEETING.
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
BY -s- Carolyn K. Eggert, Chairman
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of December 10, 1997:
TO: James E. Chandler
County Administrator
D ON HEAD CONCURRENCE:
4t'
i v I �— ; rl,Obeating, AICP
Community Development' ect r
4-19
FROM: Stan Boling, AICP
Planning Director
DATE: December 10, 1997
SUBJECT: Final Hearing on Proposed LDR Amendments
It is requested that the data herein presented be given formal consideration by the Board of County
Commissioners at its regular meeting of December 16, 1997.
BACKGROUND:
At its December 1, 1997 special meeting, the Board of County Commissioners considered various
IDR amendments related to landscaping and other issues. At that meeting, the Board directed staff
to make some changes to two proposed amendments (see attachment #1). Those changes have been
made and are incorporated into the attached ordinance (see attachment #2).
DECEMBER 16, 1997
-19-
&09K . fwu 710
In addition to the Board directed changes, staff has also made two additional changes related to
landscaping clearance from electrical facilities and seawall permitting within the City of Vero Beach.
These changes are also incorporated into the proposed ordinance.
The Board is now to take final action and approve, approve with modifications, or deny the proposed
ordinance.
ANALYSIS•
Changes from the December 1st version of the ordinance are bolded and italicized in attachment #2,
and are as follows:
1. Commercial nurseries in agricultural districts.
At its December 1st meeting, Board members agreed that the intent of the existing LDRs is
to limit commercial nurseries in agricultural districts to cultivation and wholesaling uses and
to prohibit all on-site sales. By prohibiting such sales, members of the general public are to
be precluded from patronizing the site. Consequently, no special site and building
improvements are required to accommodate the general public. Also, the prohibition draws
a clear and logical distinction between an agriculturally -oriented commercial nursery and a
retail commercial use that is more appropriately restricted to commercial zoning districts.
The proposed ordinance specifically states that on-site retail sales are prohibited for
agriculturally zoned commercial nurseries. The ordinance also specifically states that
cultivation, wholesaling, and off-site landscaping services (maintenance, delivery, design and
installation) are allowed on agriculturally zoned commercial nursery sites. Such off-site
landscaping services would not draw the general public to agriculturally zoned sites and
would merely involve storage and use of the types of materials and equipment kept on site for
cultivation and wholesaling activities.
2. Fruit -spreading setbacks.
As agreed upon at the December 1st meeting, proposed setbacks between spread fruit and
public roads, private potable wells, and waterbodies have been increased from 200' to 300'.
3. County review and permitting of seawalls in the City of Vero Beach.
Staff has changed slightly the proposal to bring the county LDRs into line with an existing
arrangement whereby the county reviews and permits seawalls within the City of Vero Beach.
The changes are intended to ensure that the county's purview within the City relates to
seawalls only, and not other coastal issues such as turtle fighting/protection (see attachment
#3).
4. Landscaping clearance from electrical facilities.
Following the December 1st hearing, an FP&L representative asked staff to consider some
modifications to a proposal establishing landscaping clearances from electrical facilities (see
attachment #3). In staffs opinion, the requested changes are reasonable. These changes are
as follows:
A. Require a 10' rather than a 3' canopy tree clearance from power lines. Because FP&L
follows ANSI (American National Safety Institute) standards, FP&L trims trees to
maintain a 10' clearance from powerlines. Vero Beach electrical engineering staff
have stated that Vero Beach Electric also generally follows ANSI standards.
Therefore, it is reasonable to require landscape designers to take into account the 10'
clearance standard when proposing trees within 30' (horizontal) of a powerline. The
revised ordinance establishes such a requirement.
B. Require a Y tree, shrub, and vine clearance from utility poles, guy wires and anchors,
and transformer pads. Such a clearance is needed for maintenance purposes and
should be able to be accommodated without compromising any landscaping
requirements.
Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners adopt the attached LDR ordinance.
DECEMBER 16, 1997
Planning Director Stan Boling went over the 4 changes to the Land Development
Regulations.
Chairman Eggert noted that the Memorandum omitted the word "retail" from the
3' line of Item No. 1, Commercial Nurseries in Agricultural Districts, and Director
Boling advised that it is included in the proposed ordinance.
The Chairman opened the public hearing regarding Item No. 1, Commercial
Nurseries in Agricultural Districts, and asked if anyone wished to be heard regarding this
matter.
Mike Rhoads, the owner of The Landscape Stop on 510, stated that the County has
issued a combination license to him for 3 years and he felt some time should be allowed
to relocate his retail operation. His whole life is invested in this business and he is not
disputing that changes should be made but asked for a 6 -month period to relocate
Director Boling explained to the Board that Mr. Rhoads' business is a commercial
operation in an agriculturally zoned district. He believed that Mr. Rhoads had reference
to an occupational license which was issued for the past 3 years which does not absolve
him from the responsibility of operating in an appropriately zoned area.
Chairman Eggert stated that several of the Commissioners have been in the nursery
business and understand that the relocation would take some time but felt that 6 months
is too long.
Commissioner Tippin thought 2 months would be sufficient but agreed to allow 3
months.
Mr. Rhoads felt 3 months would be fair.
Chairman Eggert asked if anyone else wished to be heard regarding Item No. 1.
There being none, she closed the public hearing.
Chairman Eggert directed staff to make a special note giving Mr. Rhoads 3 months
to establish a new retail part of his nursery.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Macht,
SECONDED by Commissioner Ginn, the Board, by
a 4-0 vote (Commissioner Adams being absent)
unanimously approved Item No. 1 as submitted by
staff.
DECEMBER 16, 1997
r
-21- �ti��
Chairman Eggert then opened the public hearing regarding Item No. 2, Fruit -
Spreading Setbacks and asked if anyone wished to be heard. There being none, she closed
the public hearing.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Ginn, SECONDED
by Commissioner Tippin, the Board, by a 4-0 vote
(Commissioner Adams being absent) unanimously
approved Item No. 2 as submitted by staff.
Chairman Eggert then opened the public hearing regarding Item No. 3, County
Review and Permitting of Seawalls in the City of Vero Beach, and asked if anyone wished
to be heard regarding this matter. There being none, she closed the public hearing.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Ginn, SECONDED
by Commissioner Tippin, the Board, by a 4-0 vote
(Commissioner Adams being absent) unanimously
approved Item No. 3 as submitted by staff.
Regarding Paragraph 7 ofthe proposed Ordinance, Amending Landscaping Chapter
Section 926.09(3)(a) as follows:
Amending landscaping chapter section 926.09(3):
(3) Parking area interior landscaping.
(a) For off-street parking (driving aisles. driveways parkinsg spaces loading
areasl areas equal to at least ten (10) percent of the total paved area
(driving aisles. drivewayMparking_spaces loading areass) shall be provided
with interior landscaping. Please see Mraphic at end of this chapter
illustrating how this requirement is calculated
(b) Each separate ...required landscaped area shall contain a minimum of one
hundred (100) square feet and.iall :a tiuenn with
minimum
dimensions of at least ten (10) feet in areas where a tree is
Rlanted. and shall include at least one tree having a clear trunk of at least
five (5) feet, with the remaining area adequately landscaped with shrubs,
Coding: Words in bl6&5&ass type are deletions from existing law. Words underlined are
additions. 5
Commissioner Ginn stated that she could not agree to the 10% minimum. She felt more
green space is needed and that it is a "now or never" action.
DECEMBER 16, 1997
-22-
Commissioner Tippin observed that perhaps the parking requirements could be
reduced which might increase the green space.
Chairman Eggert then opened the public hearing regarding Item No. 4,
Landscaping Clearance from Electrical Facilities.
Rachael Scott, Florida Power and Light representative, thanked the Board for the
opportunity to work with the County in trying to improve safety and reliability. FPL is
making an effort to improve the distances between trees and power lines, particularly in
the storm season. She felt that 10 feet would be the minimum for a safety standard and
stated that FPL is also trying to maintain clearances of 5 feet from ground facilities.
Chairman Eggert supported the clearances with tears in her eyes for some of the
50 to 100 year-old trees which will be affected.
Chairman Eggert asked if anyone else wished to be heard regarding Item No. 4.
There being none, she closed the public hearing.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Macht,
SECONDED by Commissioner Tippin, the Board,
by a 3-1 vote (Commissioner Ginn opposed and
Commissioner Adams being absent) approved Item
No. 4 as submitted by staff.
Chairman Eggert then opened the public hearing regarding the entire proposed
Ordinance and asked if anyone wished to be heard. There being none, the Chairman
closed the public hearing.
Commissioner Ginn reiterated that she did not think the provision of 10% of the
total paved area for off-street parking to be provided with interior landscaping, nor the
minimum dimension of at least 10 feet in areas where a tree is planted, was adequate.
DECEMBER 16, 1997
-23- bfn F?�C£
"box�"A'a
ON MOTION by Commissioner Tippin,
SECONDED by Commissioner Macht, the Board,
by a 3-1 vote (Commissioner Ginn opposed and
Commissioner Adams being absent) adopted
Ordinance 97-29 changing the list of permitted uses
within the A- 1, A-2, A-3, PRO, OCR, CN, CL and
CG Zoning Districts, and amending the following
Chapters of the Land Development Regulations
(LDRs): Chapter 911, Zoning; Chapter 917,
Accessory Uses and Structures; Chapter 926,
Landscape and Buffer Regulations; Chapter 932,
Coastal Management; Chapter 952, Traffic; Chapter
971, Regulations for Specific Land Use Criteria; and
providing for repeal of conflicting provisions,
codification, severability and effective date.
ORDINANCE NO. 97- 29
AN ORDINANCE OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, CHANGING
THE LIST OF PERMITTED USES WITHIN THE A-1, A-2, A-3, PRO, OCR,
CN, CL, AND CG ZONING DISTRICTS, AND AMENDING THE
FOLLOWING CHAPTERS OF THE LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS
(LDRS): CHAPTER 911, ZONING, CHAPTER 917, ACCESSORY USES AND
STRUCTURES; CHAPTER 926, LANDSCAPE AND BUFFER
REGULATIONS; CHAPTER 932, COASTAL MANAGEMENT; CHAPTER
952, TRAFFIC; CHAPTER 971, REGULATIONS FOR SPECIFIC LAND USE
CRITERIA, AND PROVIDING FOR REPEAL OF CONFLICTING
PROVISIONS, CODIFICATION, SEVERABILITY AND EFFECTIVE DATE.
BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County,
Florida that the Indian River County land development regulations (LDRs) be amended as
follows:
I. COMMERCIAL NURSERIES IN AGRICULTURAL AREAS.
Amend a portion of the use table of LDR section 911.06(4) to read as follows:
"Uses A-1 A-2 A-3 RFD RS -1
AGRICULTURAL
Nursery and greenhouses
Noncommercial P
Commercial (cultivation. wholesaling-
and
holesalingand off-site landscanine services allowed•
no retail sales allowed on-site) P
DECEMBER 16, 1997
-24-
P P
A
A
P P
--
—"
ORDINANCE NO. 97-_2Q
2. CORRECTION OF SCRIVENER'S ERROR
A. Amend a portion of the use table in LDR section 911.10(4), as follows.
" PRO OCR MED CN CL co CH
Auto Repair, Services and Parking
Automotive fluid sales and services
(other than gasoline) — — — — A # g P"
B. Amend LDR section 971.12(3)(a) as follows:
"(3) Self-service storage facilities (administrative permit).
(a) District requiring administrative permit approval, (pursuant to the
provisions of 971.05): CG.
C. Amend LDR sections 971.44(1)(d) and (e) as follows:
"(d) All commercial communications towers one hundred fifty (150) feet and
taller: special exception use approval is required. Criteria 1417 as
specified in subsection (g) below must be satisfied for approval of any
application. Applies in the following districts: A-2, A-3, Con -1, IL, and
IG.
(e) Non -conforming commercial towers may be replaced with a new tower
that does not meet the setback standards of criteria (g)1. below if the
degree of setback non -conformity is not increased, the tower is designed
for and used by multiple users, and the applicable approval procedures and
criteria for the type of tower specified in (a) -(d) above are satisfied.
1. Commercial communications towers over seventy (70) feet tall may
be approved as a special exception use on a publicly owned site in
any zoning district, subject to satisfying criteria 1- 17 of
subsection (g) below, and subject to the following:
a. The site shall be twenty (20) acres or larger in size, and
b. The proposed tower shall be set back from the nearest
boundary of developable private property a distance equal
to three hundred (300) percent of the tower height."
DECEMBER 16, 1997
—25— a, fFs :E
3.
4.
BOA Faa
ORDINANCE NO. 97- 29
DRIVE-THROUGH LANE WIDTH
Amend section 952.12(1)(b) as follows:
"(b) Drive-in facilities having one window or bay shall have sufficient on-site storage to
accommodate a minimum of five (5) queued vehicles, or one hundred (100) feet.
Drive-in facilities having in excess of one window or bay shall provide on-site
storage in accordance with the following standards:
Number of Drive -In
Windows or Bays
2
3
4
5
6
Queue Distance
8 vehicles/160 ft.
10 vehicles/200 ft.
13 vehicles/260 ft.
16 vehicles/320 ft.
19 vehicles/380 ft.
These standards may be reduced by the community development director upon
showing of good cause."
The minimum allowable width of a driving aisle serving a drive -up window, (e.g.
bank restaurant etc.) shall be nine feet (91No curb machine equipment or other
protuberance shall encroach this nine -foot wide space
COUNTY REVIEW & PERMITTING OF SEAWALLS IN THE CITY OF VERO
BEACH.
Amend county code section 932.04 as follows:
"(1) This chapter is enacted pursuant to the authority vested in the board of county
commissioners by virtue of Article VIII, Section (1) of the Constitution of the State of
Florida and Florida Statutes, Chapter 125.01 and Chapter 163.3202.
(2) This chapter shall be applicable to all land and aquatic areas lying within the
unincorporated area of Indian River County, Florida.
(3) Subsections 932.06(7). Seawalls and bulkheads and 932.06(9). Emergency
provisions. of this Chapter shall be applicable to all oceanfront properties lying within the
municipal limits of the City of Vero Beach. Florida."
DECEMBER 16, 1997
—26—
s �
ORDINANCE NO. 97- 29
S. SETBACKS FOR FRUIT SPREADING
A. Amend a portion of the use table of zoning ordinance section 911.06(4), to read as
follows:
A-1 A-2 A-3 RFD RS -1
"Agricultural
General farming P
P
P — —
Dairy farming A
A
A — —
Livestock & poultry raising P
P
P -- —
Stables (noncommercial) P
P
P A A
Stable (commercial) P
P
P — —
Sludge spreading A
A
A — —
Tree farms P
P
P — —
Kennel & animal boarding places
Commercial A
A
A — —
Noncommercial P
P
P P A
Fruit & vegetable juice extractions
& packing houses A
A
A — —
Small animal specialty farms A
A
A — —
Tenant dwelling S
S
S -- —
Residential migrant housing facility S
S
S
*Nursery & greenhouses
Noncommercial P
P
P A A
Commercial P
P
P — —
Agricultural businesses, excluding
wholesaling & processing S
S
S — —
Agricultural industries S
S
S — —
Fish farms A
A
A — —
Agricultural research facilities A
A
A — —
Aquaculture A
A
A A A
Fruit spreading_[subject to
section 917.06(15)1 P
P
P = _"
*Editor's Note: changes are proposed under section 1 of this ordinance.
B. Establish section 917.06(15) of the accessory uses and structures ordinance to read
as follows:
"C15 Fruit is permitted to be spread on land for live stock feed or as a soil
additive, as an accessory use to the agricultural
use on site subject to the
following restrictions:
1. Spreading of fruit is allowed on agriculturally
zoned property only.
2. Fruit that is spread shall not be located closer than:
a. 300' from the nearest edge of a public road and
b. 300' from a private supply
potable water well. and
c. 300' from a lake, river, creek, or drainage district canal or
waterway. and
d. 500' from an occupied structure (residential or non-
residential), and
e. 1.500' from a public supply
water well (as defined by state
DECEMBER 16, 1997
L
box
ORDINANCE NO. 97- 29
6. VEHICLES ANCILLARY TO OFFICE USES
Establish a footnote to the "General and professional office" use category of the use table
of LDR section 911.10(4), to read as follows:
PRO OCR MED CN CL CG CH
"General and professional
officeA P P — P P P —
4Uses, such as limousine services and construction offices. which would not be allowed
within certain zoning districts, such as OCR may be considered general office uses and
permitted if the following conditions are met:
All Wes of vehicles [reference 911.15(3 a I and materials kept on site shall be
)(J
limited to those materials and Wes of vehicles allowed in residential areas.
The number of vehicles used for business purposes and that meet the above
condition and that are kW on site shall be limited to 25% of the number of
parking apaces required for the office use.
Except for vehicle parking, all uses shall be conducted within an office building.
7. TREE SIZE & INTERIOR TO PARE) NG LOT REQUIREMENTS
Amend landscaping chapter section 926.06(3)(a) -(d) as follows:
(3) Trees.
(a) Canopy trees
I Canopy trees shall be species having an average mature spread of
crown of greater than fifteen (15) feet (under local climatic
conditions) and OM" having a trunk(s) with over five (5) feet
of clear wood. "Clear wood" refers to that portion of the trunk
between the ground and the lowest lateral limbs.
2. Installed canopy trees shall be considered "mature" wears after
installation.
3. Clusters of oalms can be used as a canovN treeprovidedthat a
minimum of 3 palms are clustered to equal one qgnoga tree.
However, the 3 to I clustering mquirement can be reduced or
eliminated by the community develgpment director or his designee
for palms with large canopies such as CanM Island date palms.
(b) Trees having an average mature spread of crown less than fifteen (15) feet
may be substituted by grouping the same so as to create the equivalent of a
fifteen -foot crown spread.
(c) Palms clusters shall be considered trees_ " Palms. if used, 40 shall
consist of no more than fifty (50) percent of the total new tree requirement
when said palms are existing on the site or are relocated on the same site.
(d)
W)&"W
DECEMBER 16, 1997
-28-
ORDINANCE NO. 97- 29
Tree Sizes:
1. Required canopy trees shall be a minimum of ten (10) feet overall
in height and two (2) inchdiameter at 0.5' above grade. at the time
of planting.excgpt as follows:
a. Within the Wabasso and SR 60 corridor areas, required
canopy trees shall be a minimum of twelve (12) feet overall
in height, minimum two (2) inch diameter at 0.5' above
grade and 6' minimum spread at time of planting
palm clusters are used, the 10' and 12' minimum shall be
provided as clear wool rather than an overall tree hem
b. Where a building between 12' and 25' in heiaht is nronosed
to be located within 50' of a perimeter property lim
canopy trees within required buffers (Types A -D) located
between the building and a site perimeter shall be a
minimum of 12' in height and a 2" diameter at 0.5' above
grade at planting and a minimum 6' spread, except that at
least one-third of the required buffer canopy trees shall be a
minimum of 16' in height and 3" diameter at 0.5' above
grade and a minimum 8' spread at time of Wig. Where a
building between 12' and 25' in height is proposed more
than 50' from a perimeter, the canopy tree height
requirements of (d) 1. above, shall apply to canopy trees
within the buffer.
C. Where a building_over 25 in_heiuht is proposed to be
located within 70' of a perimeter pr RgM line. all canopy
trees within required buffers (Types A -D) located between
the building and a site perimeter shall be a minimum of 16'
in heip-ht and a 3" diameter at 0.5' above grade and a
minimum 8' s rp ead at planting. Where a building over 25' in
height is proposed more than 70' from a perimeter, the
canovytree height requirements ofld)1 above. Shall apply
to canopy trees within the buffer.
2. Required understoly trees shall be a minimum of five (5) feet
overall in height and one (1) inch diameter at 0.5' above grade, at
the time of planting. Multi -trunk trees shall have a 1" caliper for all
trunks at 6" above grade.
DECEMBER 16, 1997
Amending landscaping chapter section 926.09(3):
(3) Parking area interior landscaping.
(a) For off-street parking (driving aisles. driveways. parking space& loadin
aresI areas equal to at least ten (10) percent of the total paved area
(driving aisles, driveways, parking spaces, loading areas) shall be provided
with interior landscaping. Please see g_ranhic at end of this chaff
illustrating how this requirement is calculated.
(b) Each separate, required landscaped area shall contain a minimum of one
hundred(100)
care feet aiwith
minimum dimensions of at least ten (10) feet in areas where a tree is
1p anted. and shall include at least one tree having a clear trunk of at least
five (5) feet, with the remaining area adequately landscaped with shrubs,
ground cover or other authorized landscaping material not to exceed three
(3) feet in height.
1. To preserve adequate sight distance, end islands at intersections of
internal driveways shall be designed and maintained to preserve a
visual 'blear window" for the area between 3' and T above the
adjacent barking lot grade.
(c) The total number of trees shall not be less than one for each three hundred
(300) square feet of fraction thereof of required interior landscaped area.
Such landscaped areas shall be located in such a manner as to divide and
break up the expanse of paving.
(d) When, upon the request of the developer and in the opinion of the
community development director, the placing of all required interior trees
would create an impractical landscape effect, a portion of the required
interior trees may be placed along the perimeter of the parking area to
satisfy this requirement.
(e) The area to be counted for interior landscaping requirements shall be
graphically depicted on landscape plans by cross -hatching or other graphic
means.
DECEMBER 16, 1997
-30-
PERIMETER
LANDSCAPE
DECEMBER 16, 1997
C�
-31-
t
I
- CREDITABLE
VEHICULAR
LANDSCAPE
AREA
PARKING LOT
SHELL
BOUNDARY
EXAMPLE PROVIDES
APPROX.14% OF
THE PAVED AREA
AS GREEN AREA
60J Fwu y
ORDINANCE NO. 97-29
8. LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE & REPLACEMENT
Amend landscape chapter section 926.12 as follows:
(1) Installation.
Lal All landscaping shall be installed in a sound workmanlike manner and
according to accepted good planting procedures, with the quality of plant
materials as her described. Prior to or at the time a certificate of
ocgUDancv inspection is requested of code enforcement staffi the project
landscape architect or landscape contractor shall certify in writing the date
he or she last inspected the landscape installation and that all installed
landscape material that is required by ordinance is Florida No 1 or better.
All elements of landscaping, exclusive of plant material, shall be installed so
as to meet all other applicable ordinances and code requirements.
Landscaped areas shall require protection from vehicular encroachment. A
code enforcement official shall inspect all landscaping, and no final
certificates of occupancy or similar authorization will be issued unless the
landscaping meets the requirements provided herein.
J Bonding to guarantee installation Required landscape materials can be
bonded -out for future installation in the event of a Board of County
Commissioners recognized disaster (e.t► freeze or hurricane) that adversely
affects availability of landscape materials. At the time that it recognizes
such a disaster. the Board shall set a timeframe by which required
landscaping must be installed.
In addition to bonding -out after such disasters the Planning and Zoning
Commission is authorized to approve bonding -out for installation of
rewired landscape materials where such installation needs to be delayed in
coordination with adjacent road construction that would disrupt adjacent
landsca eD areas.
To bond -out for future (post C O) installation. a cash bond must be
posted with the county in the amount of 115% of the contract installation
>l rim•
(2) Maintenance.
(-a) The owner, or his agent, shall maintain all landscaping depicted on the
approved plan in good condition, so as to present a healthy, neat and
orderly appearance, free from refuse and debris, and in a manner quantity
and variety required by this article, for the duration of use of the site. All
landscaped areas shall be provided with an adequate irrigation system, as
provided for in section 926.11. Completed project sites shall be reviewed
periodically by code enforcement officials for compliance with these
provisions, and any violations shall be presented to the code enforcement
board.
bL Native plant areas used for landscaping purposes may be left in their
natural condition, providing they are maintained so as not to create a health
or safety hazard. These areas may also be excluded from the water supply
requirements, providing they are in a healthy condition upon issuance of a
final certificate of occupancy. Consistent with section 929.08, all approved
DECEMBER 16, 1997
-32-
ORDINANCE NO. 97-29
sites and "native plant areas" shall be required to maintain the site free of
any nuisance exotic1p ant species.
(q) Mature trees shall not be pruned to reduce the canopy to less than the
minimum 15' spread except for the removal of dead or diseased wood.
(2) Replacement of Required Landscaping.
Required landscaping that has died or has been removed shall be replaced bX
material which is equivalent to the size that the material should have attained from
the time of project C.O. (Certificate of Occupancy). as follows:
From 0-18 months after project C.O.. landscape materials may be retraced
at the sizes indicated on the approved site plan.
From 18 to 36 months after project C.O.. replacement shrubs shall be a
minimum of 30" in height, replacement canopy trees shall be a minimum of
16' in height and 3" diameter at 0.5' above grade. and replacemem
understory trees shall be a minimum of 7' tall with a 1'/z" diameter at 0.5'
above grade.
More than 36 months after project C.O.. replacement shrubs shall be a
minimum of 36" in height, replacement canopy trees shall be a minimum of
at 18' in height with a 4"diameter at 0.5' above grade, and replacement
understory trees a minimum of 10' with a 2" diameter at 0.5' above grade.
All replacement material shall be the species shown on the approved site
plan or a substitute approved by the county in the specified location.
9. LANDSCAPING ALONG ROADWAYS
Amend landscaping chapter section 926.09 as follows:
Landscaping Along Roadways
(1)
feet in depth shall be located adjacent to the right-of-way along the site's entire
road frontage. Within the strip, landscap:mg shall be provided as follows:
(a) zp o at i tern �(tl} deetp dept pe tfiiig
- aml the �#1' partecerht eagosett..,...
............................ t
.r:�.:i�30�lstte�l.�,ptr',�� Landscaping
materials shall be planted in the following quantities:
1. Along local roads: one (1) canopy tree for each thirty (30) lineal
feet or fraction thereof.
2. Along collector roads: one (1) canopy tree for each twenty-five
(25) lineal feet or fraction thereof for canopy trees 10' high at time
of phuiting or one (1) canopy tree for each thirty (30) lineal feet or
fraction thereof for canopy trees 12' high at time ofIp gu ft.
DECEMBER 16, 1997
(b)
ORDINANCE NO. 97- 29
3. Alone arterial roads: one (1) understoly tree for each twenty-five
(25) lineal feet or fraction thereof and one (1) ono= tree for each
twenty-five (25) lineal feet or fraction thereof for canopy trees 10'
high at time of planting or one 1)canny tree for each !WM 30)
lineal feet or fraction thereof for canopy trees 12' high at time of
�kaIItm• g.
Note: Trees are not required to be spaced uniformly along the landscape
strip. Different. special roadway landscaping/buffering requirements apply
to projects within areas covered by adopted corridor plans such as the
Wabasso and SR 60 corridor plans
trees planted adjacent to a rit-of-way shall be planted in a planting area
of at least one hundred (100) square feet with minimum dimensions being
at least ten (10) feet in any direction
(c) In addition, a hedge, wall, fence or other durable landscape barrier of at
least foM three 3 feet in height above the adjacent parking lot grade
shall be maintained along the perimeter of such landscaped strip. Use of
landscaped berms is encouraged to meet this requirement
(d) If such durable barrier is of nonliving material, at each ten (10) feet thereof;
one shrub or vine shall be planted abutting such barrier, but need not be
spaced ten (10) feet apart.
(e) Such shrubs or vines shall be planted along the street side of such barrier
unless they are of sufficient height at the time of planting to be readily
visible over the top of such barrier.
(f) The remainder of the required landscaped areas shall be landscaped with
grass, ground cover or other landscape treatment, excluding paving.
Necessary access ways from the public right-of-way through all such
landscaping areas shall be permitted to service the parking, and such access
ways may be subtracted from the lineal dimension used to determine the
number of trees required.
*Editor's Note: remaining portions of section 926.09 are unchanged.
Amend landscaping chapter section 926.10 as follows:
(1) General landscaping treatment. All nonvehicular open spaces on any site proposed
for development in all zoning districts, except for single family dwellings, shall
conform to the minimum landscaping requirements herein provided.
Grass, ground cover, shrubs, native plant areas and other landscaping materials
shall be used to treat all ground not covered by building, paving or other
structures.
DECEMBER 16, 1997
-34-
ORDINANCE NO. 97- 29
(2) Trees required. Trees shall be planted in the nonvehicular open space to meet the
following requirements:
(a) Multiple -family residential zoning districts and mobile home residential
zoning districts requiring site plan approval: a minimum of one tree per
each two thousand (2,000) square feet of nonvehicular open space or
fraction thereof,
(b) Commercial zoning districts (except "heavy commercial") and medical
districts: a minimum of one tree per each three thousand (3,000) square
feet of nonvehicular open space or fraction thereof,
(c) Heavy commercial, and industrial zoning districts: a minimum of one tree
per each four thousand (4,000) square feet of nonvehicular open space or
fraction thereof.
NMS;9F=W=6
� :..� ..>.:.:;:.;;;::>
10. LANDSCAPING CLEARANCE FROM ELECTRICAL FACILITIES
Establish landscaping chapter section 926.09(6); as follows:
Landscaping near overhead electrical transmission or distribution lines
La) When canopy trees are pmvosed to beplanted within 30' (horizontal
distancel of overhead electrical transmission or distribution Imes (not
service lined the following; shallapply:
1. A cross-section shall be provided on the landscape plan. depicting
the estimated can0 shape and size at maturity in relation to the
location of the lowest electrical overhead transmission or
distribution wire and the distance from the mature tree canopy
edge to the wire.
2. The distance from the estimated mature tree canopy edge to the
wire shall be at least 10'.
DECEMBER 16, 1997
-35- Pr,
ORDINANCE NO. 97- 29
fib) Within a horizontal distance of 30' of an overhead electrical transmission or
distribution line (not a service line), in addition to generally prohibited
exotic nuisance species the following plant species are prohibited from
being used on any landscaping Rian for county approval• Earleaf
Acacia, Woman's Tongue Tree Norfolk Island Pine Bischofia, Schefflera.
Ear Tree Eucalyptus Non -Native Ficus. Silk Oak Chinese Tallow Tree
and Java Plum.
Establish landscaping chapter section 926.09(7), as follows:
ja Landscaping near utility voles, guy wires, and transformer pads. Tree& shrubs,
and vines shall be planted and maintained so as to Provide a clearance of at
least S' around utility Poles. guy wires and anchors, and transformer Pads.
11. PERIMETER BUFFER STANDARDS
Amend landscaping chapter section 926.08, as follows:
(1) A perimeter buffer is a landscaped strip along parcel boundaries that serves as a
buffer between incompatible uses and zoning districts, as an attractive boundary of
the parcel or use, or as both a buffer and attractive boundary. Existing native
vegetation and upland native plant communities as described in Chapter 929,
Upland Habitat Protection, may be utilized to meet buffer requirements.
(2) The width and degree of vegetation required depends on the nature of adjoining
thoroughfares and uses. Chapter 915, Planned Development, and Chapter 911,
Zoning, of the County Land Development Code, set forth buffer type requirements
for adjacent properties, based on land use and zoning districts.
(3) Buffer types and opg ue features. There are four (4) buffer types to be utilized in
Indian River County. They are, in order of intensity, as follows: Type A buffer,
Type B buffer, Type C buffer and Type D buffer. Buffers may require opaque
features including three foot and six foot opaaue features. where specified in the
land development regulations
(4) Required opaque features shall consist of a solid masonry wall or earthen berm
unless the Planning and Zoning_ Commission approves a substitute material (such
as a completely opaque living landscape barrier) based upon the use and conditions
of the project site and adjacent site. Landscaping is required along both sides of a
wall unless otherwise approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission.
(5) In cases where the abutting*, use/district is separated from the project site by a local
road. the buffer We shall be reduced one category We e.g. from Type "A" or
Type "B"), but the height of the opaque feature shall remain the same. In cases
where the abutting; use(district is separated from the project site by a Thorou are
Plan road. the buffer type shall be reduced two category tomes L. a. "A" to "C")
but in all cases shall require at least a Type "D" buffer.
(Q ftuired 3' and 6' opgque features shall be measured from the finished floor
elevation of the proposed structure(s). This requirement can be modified -b_y the
Planning and Zoning Commission based upon grade differences and the
relationship between the height and mass of the proposed building and its setback
from the property line The maximum required height of an opaque feature shall
be 8' above the site Vade where the feature is located
DECEMBER 16, 1997
-36-
ORDINANCE NO. 97-29
U7Z Hedge or shrub material within buffers may be reduced by 50% when a 6' wall or
fence is provided within the buffer, if the remaining amount of required shrub
material and at least 50% of required understory tree material are planted between
the p oiect site perimeter and the wall or fence Alternative planting locations may
be approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission
The standards for the buffer categories are set forth in the illustrations herein that specify
the number of plants required per one hundred (100) lineal feet. To determine the total
number of plants required, the linear footage of each side of the property requiring a
buffer shall be divided by one hundred (100) and multiplied by the number of plants shown
in the illustration. The plants shall be spread in a reasonably even manner along the length
of the buffer. Buffer opaque feature options are also illustrated herein and are further
defined in Chapter 901, Definitions, of the County Land Development Code.
12. BUFFERS BETWEEN COMMERCIAL & RESIDENTIAL
Amend zoning chapter section 911.10(8), as follows:
(8) Required buffer yards:
Buffer yards are required along rear/side property lines and measured at right
angles to lot lines. All screening and buffering requirements shall meet the
standards established in section 926, Landscaping and Buffering. No parking or
loading shall be permitted within buffer yards.
When a_loading dock is proposed to serve a use that normally requires_ fr_ gquem
dock use (e.g. erogM store department storebig box retain and is to be located
adjacent to a residentially designated site and will not be screened from view from
an Aacent residential site by an intervening building or structure. an 8' high wall
shall be required between the loadina dock and the resideirtial site Wall height
shall be measured from the Grade elevation of the parking area adjacent to the
loading dock. Plantings along the wall are required in accordance with the
standards of landscape section 926 08
13. BUFFERS BETWEEN INDUSTRIAL & RESIDENTIAL
Amend zoning chapter section 911.11(7), as follows:
() Buffer yard requirements. Where a nonresidential use within an industrial district
directly abuts a single family or multi -family residential zoning district or use, a
landscaped buffer yard meeting the following specifications shall be required along
the side and/or rear property lines.
DECEMBER 16, 1997
-37- E1Li: P g ��
Abutting Use/District
Single Family
Multi -Family
District
Buffer Type
Buffer Type
PRO
C - 6 ft. Opaque
D - 3 ft. Opaque
OCR
C - 6 ft. Opaque
D - 3 ft. Opaque
NIED
C - 6 ft. Opaque
D - 3 ft. Opaque
CN
B - 6 ft. Opaque
C - 6 ft. Opaque
CL
B - 6 ft. Opaque
C - 6 ft. Opaque
CG
B - 6 ft. Opaque
C - 6 ft. Opaque
CH
B - 6 ft. Opaque
B - 6 ft. Opaque
Buffer yards are required along rear/side property lines and measured at right
angles to lot lines. All screening and buffering requirements shall meet the
standards established in section 926, Landscaping and Buffering. No parking or
loading shall be permitted within buffer yards.
When a_loading dock is proposed to serve a use that normally requires_ fr_ gquem
dock use (e.g. erogM store department storebig box retain and is to be located
adjacent to a residentially designated site and will not be screened from view from
an Aacent residential site by an intervening building or structure. an 8' high wall
shall be required between the loadina dock and the resideirtial site Wall height
shall be measured from the Grade elevation of the parking area adjacent to the
loading dock. Plantings along the wall are required in accordance with the
standards of landscape section 926 08
13. BUFFERS BETWEEN INDUSTRIAL & RESIDENTIAL
Amend zoning chapter section 911.11(7), as follows:
() Buffer yard requirements. Where a nonresidential use within an industrial district
directly abuts a single family or multi -family residential zoning district or use, a
landscaped buffer yard meeting the following specifications shall be required along
the side and/or rear property lines.
DECEMBER 16, 1997
-37- E1Li: P g ��
Fr,
Boa 1.1 IJJ
4
ORDINANCE NO. 97- 29
District Single Family Zoning Multi -Family Zoning
II, Type A 6 & Opaque Feature Type A 6 R Opaque Feature
IG Type A 6 & Opaque Feature Type A 6 & Opaque Feature
The buffer yards shall be at right angles to the lot line. All screening requirements
shall meet the standards established in Chapter 926, Landscaping and Buffering.
No off-street parldng or loading area shall be permitted within the buffer yard.
When a loading dock is proposed to serve a use rewiring frequent dock use Le.g.
grocery store department store), and is to be located adjacent to a residentially
designated site, and will not be screened from view from an adjacent residential
site by an intervening building or structure, an W high wall shall be req 'cared
between the loading dock and the residential site Wall height shall be measured
from the grade elevation of the parking area adjacent to the loading dock
Plantings along the wall are required in accordance with the standards of landscape
section 926.08.
14. REPEAL OF CONFLICTING PROVISIONS
All previous ordinances, resolutions, or motions of the Board of County Commissioners of
Indian River County, Florida which conflict with the provisions of this ordinance are hereby
repealed to the extent of such conflict. All Special Acts of the legislature applying only to the
unincorporated portion of Indian River County which conflict with the provisions of this
ordinance are hereby repealed to the extent of such conflict.
1S. CODIFICATION
The provisions of this ordinance shall be incorporated into the County Code and the word
"Ordinance" may be changed to "section', "article", or other appropriate word, and the sections
of this ordinance may be renumbered or relettered to accomplish such intentions.
16. SEVERABILITY
If any section, part of a sentence, paragraph, phrase or word of this ordinance is for any
reason held to be unconstitutional, inoperative or void, such holdings shall not affect the
remaining portions hereof and it shall be construed to have been the legislative intent to pass this
ordinance without such unconstitutional, invalid or inoperative part.
17. EFFECTIVE DATE
The provisions of this ordinance shall become effective upon filing with the Department of
State.
Approved and adopted by the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County,
Florida on this
1997.
16 day of December
This ordinance was advertised in the Vero Beach Press -Journal on the 22 day of November
1997, and on the _g_ day of nPr,.mhPr 1997, for public hearings
to be heldon the 1 day of December , 1997, and on the 16 day of
December 1997 at which time at the final hearing it was moved for adoption by
Commissioner Ti ppi n , seconded by Commissioner
Macht and adopted by the following vote;
DECEMBER 16, 1997
-38-
ORDINANCE NO. 97- 29
Chairman Carolyn K. Eggert dye
Vice Chairman John W. Tippin Aye
Commissioner Fran B. Adams Absent
Commissioner Caroline D. Ginn Nay
Commissioner Kenneth R. Macht Aye
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
By n -
Carolyn K. Lyggert, C
ATTEST BY:
K. B,arto Jerk b e I
V
Acknowledgment by the Department of State of the State of Florida this day of
. 1997.
Effective Date: Filed with the Department of State on the day of
1997.
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM
William G. Collins
Deputy County Attorney
APPROVED AS TO PLANNING MATTERS
Robert M. Keating, AICM
Community Developmen Direct
Coding: Words in lte»it type are deletions from existing law. Words underlined are
additions. 14
DECEMBER 16, 1997
-39-
e;a1K
11.A. JUDAH PROPERTY LAAC SITE — PURCHASE
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of November 14, 1997:
TO:
FROM:
James E. Chandler
County Administrator
DEP TMENT HEAD CONCURRENCE:
i
A
Robert 1vf. Keating, AICP
Community Development Director
DATE: November 14, 1997
Roland M. DeBlois, CP
Chiely Environmental Planning
SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR BOARD APPROVAL TO PURCHASE
THE JUDAH PROPERTY LAAC SITE
It is requested that the information herein presented be given formal consideration by the Board of
County Commissioners at its regular meeting of December 16, 1997.
SUMMARY
Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners purchase (with bond funds) the Judah
property LAAC site. The proposed purchase contract (already executed by the seller) is summarized
as follows:
Purchaser. Indian River County Board of County Commissioners
Seller. Viola Judah
Cost -Share: N/A
Total Price: $7,440 (assessed value)
County Bonds
Expenditure: ±$7,440 (appmximate, not including closing cost. as applicable)
Acreage: ± 0.17 acres
LAAC Recommendation•
The Land Acquisition Advisory Committee (LAAC), at its meeting on November 19. 1997. voted
unanimously to recommend that the Board purchase the subject Judah property at the tax assessed
value of $7,440.
Principal Conditions:
Closing subject to County Commission approval. will be managed as part of the overall wetlands on
the Oslo Riverfmnt Conservation Area property, in coordination with the Indian River Mosquito
Control District
DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS
The Judah property is currently ranked 19th out of 19 projects on the LAAC site acquisition list. As
directed by LAAC, staff has negotiated a purchase contract for the County to buy the Judah property
at the tax assessed value. Attached is a copy of the contract, signed by Ms. Judah. LAAC, at its
meeting of November 19, 1997, reviewed the purchase contract and recommended unanimously that
the Board of County Commissioners approve the purchase and authorize staff to close on the
property.
Procedures adopted by the Board of County Commissioners for environmental land acquisition
include confidentiality of appraisals. However, the owner has agreed to sell the property at the tax
assessed value, and therefore no appraisals were obtained for the subject property.
DECEMBER 16, 1997
-40-
1
P GE Z
When a county obtains appraisals and exercises its confidentiality right in purchasing real property,
Section 125.355 ofthe Florida Statutes applies, which requires that the county approve the purchase
at a public meeting not less than 30 days after appraisals are released and public notice of the meeting
is given. In this case, since no appraisals were obtained and no confidentiality came into play, the
provisions of Chapter 125, F.S., do not apply. Therefore, approval of the purchase at a public meeting
is sufficient, without need for a formal public hearing with 30 days advanced public notice.
Site Characteristics
The subject Judah property is located north of Oslo Road's terminus at the Indian River Lagoon. The
0.17 acre Judah property consists of estuarine wetlands surrounded by publicly owned lands. The
Judah property is north of and adjacent to the Oslo Road boat ramp. The subject property is zoned
Con -2, Conservation, 1 unit per 40 acres. However, because the property is a non -conforming parcel
of record, the small size of the property is not affected by the low 1 unit per 40 acre density. As such,
if the property is not publicly acquired, the owner could apply for permits for some level of
development (such as a dwelling).
• Property Management
The subject Judah property is adjacent to the Oslo Riverfront Conservation Area, which is already
under public management by the County and the Indian River Mosquito Control District (1RMCD)
County. Acquisition of the Judah property will not add to management costs, but will allow the
property to be incorporated into the public lands already under management.
•Contract
The attached purchase contract is a standard contract used by the County for purchases of this scale.
ANALYSIS
Purchase of the Judah property will round -out the public ownership along the Indian River Lagoon
north of Oslo Road. The purchase will eliminate an ownership anomaly and will allow for uniform
management of wetland resources in the area.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners approve the purchase contract and
authorize staff to take the necessary actions to close on the subject Judah property.
Commissioner Macht felt the purchase is a matter of justice as the County has
hemmed the owner in, making the property useless. He also noted the purchase price is
the assessed value.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Macht,
SECONDED by Commissioner Tippm, the Board,
by a 4-0 vote (Commissioner Macht being absent)
unanimously approved the purchase contract with
Viola Judah and authorized staff to take the
necessary actions to close on the subject Judah
property, as recommended by staff.
CONTRACT IS ON FILE IN THE OFFICE
OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
11.C. BID #8022- U.S.#1 WATER MAIN EXTENSION - ALL
DECEMBER 16, 1997
-41- ,'� P lj v'
�O0K -10 'FA
H.C. BID #8022- U.S.#1 WATER MAIN EXTENSION - ALL
AMERICAN CONCRETE
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of November 24, 1997:
DATE: November 24, 1997
TO:
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
THRU:
James E. Chandler, County Administrator
H. T. "Sonny" Dean, Director,
General Services
FROM:
Alin
Fran Boynton Powell, Purchasing Mang
SUBJECT:
Award Bid #8022/U.S. #1 Water Main Extension
Utilities Department
BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
Bid Opening Date: October 29, 1997
Advertising Dates: Sept 25, Oct 2, 9, 1997
Advertisement Mailed to: Thirty Eight (38) Vendors
Replies: Ten (10) Vendors
TOTAL AMOUNT OF BID $162,665.00
ESTIMATED BUDGET: $200,068.00
S OURCE OF FUNDS Utilities Department Assesment Funds
4734000-169-315-00
RECONDAENDATION
Staff recommends that the bid be awarded to All American Concrete as the lowest, most
responsive and responsible bidder meeting specifications as set forth in the Invitation to Bid.
(See attached memo)
In addition, staff requests Board approval of the attached Agreement as to form, after all
requirements are met and approved by the County Attorney.
DECEMBER 16, 1997
-42-
ON MOTION by Commissioner Macht,
SECONDED by Commissioner Ginn, the Board, by
a 4-0 vote (Commissioner Macht being absent)
unanimously awarded Bid #8022 to All American
Concrete, as recommended by staff.
Oke
BID DOCUMENTS VdbhffBE ON FILE IN THE
OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
11.G. 58TH AVENUE RIGHT-OF-WAY ACQUISITION - SE
CORNER OF SR -60 AND 58TH AVENUE
INTERSECTION - SOUTHERN DEVELOPMENT
SERVICES (JIM ZENGAGE)
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of December 9, 1997:
TO: James E. Chandler,
County Administrator
FROM: James W. Davis,
Public Works Director'
J
SUBJECT: 58"' Avenue Right -of -Way Acquisition at SE Comer of
SR60/58th Avenue Intersection
REF. LETTER: Drake M. Batchelder to Terry O'Brien dated Dec. 5, 1997
DATE: December 9, 1997
DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS
Approximately 4,528 square feet of additional right-of-way is needed along 600 lineal feet
of the east side of Kings Highway just south of SR60. The 3.64 acre parent tract is
currently being sold to Jim Zengage, Southern Development Services, for $13.56 per
square foot, which includes closing costs and lease buy outs. The cost of the right-of-way
land, therefore, is $61,399.58. In addition, the property owner is requesting compensation
for the following:
Additional Engineering Services $ 960
Legal Fees $ 731
Plat, Survey, Legal Descriptions $ 800
Relocation of eight concrete columns $ 1,600
Removal of pavement in right-of-way area $ 4,000
Relocation of water meter $ 500
Relocation of backflow preventer 1,900
Subtotal $10,491
DECEMBER 16, 1997
-43- [�,n� �3�f 1
S i
BOX �A�f
Staff agrees that the above existing improvements, which are in the proposed right-of-way
parcel, should be relocated at the County's cost. If existing Laurel Oaks are removed by
the County, the County is requested to replaced them with 3-24' high East Palatka Holly
trees.
The total cost of the right-of-way acquisition is therefore $71,890.58 plus possibly the cost
of three holly trees.
ALTERNATIVES AND ANALYSIS
The right-of-way parcel is needed to provide a future northbound right tum lane at
SR60/58th Avenue and sidewalk. The alternatives are as follows:
Alternative No. 1
Approve the right-of-way acquisition at a cost of $71,890.58 plus possibly
the cost of three Holly trees. Funding to be from 10 Local Option Sales Tax.
Alternative No.2
Deny the right-of-way acquisition.
RECOMMENDATIONS AND FUNDING
Staff recommends Alternative No. 1.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Grin, SECONDED
by Commissioner Macht, the Board, by a 4-0 vote
(Commissioner Macht being absent) unanimously
approved the right-of-way acquisition from Southern
Development Services (Jim Zengage) at a cost of
$71,890.58 plus possibly the cost of three Holly
trees, with funding from the 1¢ Local Option Sales
Tax, as recommended by staff.
DOCUMENTS WILL BE ON FILE IN THE
--�.OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
WHEN EXECUTED AND RECEIVED
11.H.1. LAKE DELORES(PARK PLACE) MOBILE HOME
PARK - NELSON HYATT
Deleted.
DECEMBER 16, 1997
-44-
r
AN
in
11.H.2. SEBASTIAN WATER EXPANSION - PHASE I FINAL
PAY REQUEST - MASTELLER AND MOLER, INC
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of December 4, 1997:
DATE: DECEMBER 4, 1997
TO: JAMES E. CHANDLER
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
FROM: JAMES W. DAVIS, P.E.
INTERIM DIRECTOR OF UTILITY SERVICE
PREPARED MICHAEL C. HOTCHKISS, P.E. 20
AND STAFFED ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEER
BY: DEPARTMENT OF UTILITY SERVICES
SUBJECT: SEBASTIAN WATER EXPANSION -PHASE 1
FINAL PAY REQUEST TO ENGINEERING CONSULTANT
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY PROJECT NO. UW -95 -28 -DS
WIP NO. 475-000-169-285.00
BID NO. 6089
BACKGROUND
On November 21, 1995, the Board of County Commissioners (BCC)
approved Masteller and Moler, Inc. proceeding with survey, design,
permitting, inspection and preparing the assessment roll for the
above -referenced project (see attached agenda item and minutes).
The total amount of the contract approved for consulting services
was $276,900.00. The project is now complete and the Department of
Environmental Protection has issued clearance to begin connecting
customers. The Department of Utility Services is now prepared to
make final payment to the consultant for inspection services
awarded in the contract. This will allow the project to be closed
and determination of the final assessment.
ANALYSIS
The consultant has been paid previous draws in the amount of
$271,510.00 for 98% of the project. Utilities staff is now
prepared to make final payment in the amount of $420.00 for
inspection fees (see attached pay requests). This will adjust the
contract to $271,930.00, resulting in a $4,970.00 reduction.
It should also be noted that the consultant was previously paid
$5,355.00 for liquidated damages due delays in the contract. This
amount was deducted from the construction contract. Therefore, the
total amount to be paid to the consultant for this project is
$277,285.00.
RECOMMENDATION
The staff of the Department of Utility Services recommends that the
Board of County Commissioners approve final payment in the amount
of $420.00 to Masteller and Moler, Inc. and authorize the Chairman
to execute same, as presented.
DECEMBER 16, 1997
-45-
( 'Jr' a F"gc'E '
F-m'c 736
ON MOTION by Commissioner Macht,
SECONDED by Commissioner Ginn, the Board, by
a 4-0 vote (Commissioner Macht being absent)
unanimously approved the final payment to
Masteller and Moler, Inc., as recommended by staff.
13.E. COMMENTS REGARDING LIST OF WARRANTS
Commissioner Macht commented regarding the lists of warrants. Frequently there
are items relating to payments to law firms that the County is directed to pay via Court
system. He felt these payments are very often excessive and unreasonable and would like
to see these listed separately so they can be easily noted.
County Attorney Vitunac commented that his office is fighting these fees
constantly to some effect, winning some and losing some.
CONSENSUS was reached to direct staff to list separately any court directed fees
paid.
14.A. EMERGENCY SERVICES DISTRICT
The Chairman announced that, immediately upon adjournment, the Board would
reconvene as the Board of Commissioners of the Emergency Services District. Those
Minutes are being prepared separately.
14.B. SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL DISTRICT
None.
14.C. ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL BOARD
None.
There being no further business, on Motion duly made, seconded and carried, the
Board adjourned at 9:30 a.m.
ATTEST:
J. K. Barton, Clerk Carolyn Td Eggert, Cygman
Minutes Approved: - a 3 -14 7
DECEMBER 16, 1997
-46-
I