HomeMy WebLinkAbout5/5/1998•
MINUTES ATTACHED
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
A G E N D A
TUESDAY, MAY 59 1998
9:00 A.M. - COUNTY COMMISSION CHAMBER
County Administration Building
1840 25th Street, Vero Beach, Florida 32960
COUNTY C0NQ*IISSI0NERS
John W. Tippin, Chairman (District 4)
Kenneth R Macht, Vice Chairman (District 3)
Fran B. Adams (District 1)
Carolyn K. Eggert (District 2).
Caroline D. Ginn (District 5)
9:00 a.m. 1. CALL TO ORDER
James E. Chandler, County Administrator
Charles P. Vitunac, County Attorney
Jeffrey K. Barton, Clerk to the Board
•
BACKUP
2. INVOCATION Rev. Joe Brooks PAGES
20th Ave. Church of God
3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE - Comm. Kenneth R Macht
4. ADDMONS to the AGENDAA VIERGENCY ITEMS
1. Add under Item S, Presentation of Proclamation from April 28, 1998 meeting Designating May 3-9, 1998 as Tourism Week in
Indian River County.
2. Add Item 13.11, Report on SHOCAP (Serious Habitual Offenders Comprehensive Action Program) meeting.
5. PROCLAMATION and PRESENTATIONS
None
6. APPROVAL OF MIl`TUTES
Regular Meeting of April 14;1998
7. CONSENT AGENDA
A. Received and Placed on File in Office of Clerk
to the Board: Auditor General, State of Florida,
Audit of Indian River County District School
Board for FY ended June 30, 1997
B. Proclamation Designating May 10-16,1998 as
National Police Week and May 11, 1998 as
Indian River County Police Memorial Day
C. Proclamation Designating January 29, 1999 as
Thomas Paine Day in Indian River County
D. Approval of Warrants
(memorandum dated April 23, 1998)
1
2
3-13
co K
—UG FAcL3j2
7. CONSENT AGENDA (cont'd ):
E.
F.
G.
Administration Building Telephone Circuit Contract
(memorandum dated April 28, 1998)
EOJY� 105f,�GE •��
BACKUP
PAGES
14-19
Two Recently Acquired Properties - Tax Cancellations
(memorandum dated April 27,1998)
Payments to Vendors of Court Related Costs
(memorandum dated April 23, 1998)
8. CONSTITUTIONAL OFFICERS and
GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES
None
9:05 A.M. 9. PUBLIC ITEMS
A. PUBLIC HEARINGS
Kennedy Groves, Inc.'s Request to Rezone Approxi-
mately 39.17 Acres from PD (Planned Development
up to 3.54 units/acre) to PD (Planned Development up
to 3.60 units/acre); and to Receive Conceptual PD
Plan Approval for a 136 Lot Single Family Planned
Development
(memorandum dated April 27,1998)
Beach Preservation Plan Update - Will be discussed
last under Agenda Item No. 15
B. PUBLIC DISCUSSION ITEMS
None
C. PUBLIC NOTICE ITEMS
Public Hearing for May 12,1998:
Adoption of Latest Edition of National Electrical
Code (NEC) _
(no backup is provided)
10. COUNTY ADNIINISTRATOR'S MATTERS
None
11. DEPARTMENTAL MATTERS
A. Community Development
None
B. Emergency Services
Consent to Assignment of License from Sandab
Communications Limited Partnership II, to
Pinnacle Towers, Inc., Utilizing A Consent and
Estoppel Agreement
(memorandum dated April 23, 1998)
C. General Services
None
20-24
25
26-44
45-58
t
11. DEPARTMENTAL MATTERS (cont'd )
D. Leisure Services
None
E. Office of Management and Budget
None
F. Personnel
None
G. Public Works
1. Request for Floodplain Cut and Fill Balance
Waiver for Lot 12, Block 10, Vero Lake
Estates, Unit No. 1
(memorandum dated April 24, 1998)
2. Florida Power & Light Distribution Line
Relocation / Kings Highway (58th Ave.)
Improvements, Main Relief Canal Bridge
(memorandum dated April 28, 1998)
EL Utilities
Sebastian Highlands Water Expansion Phase II -A
Resolutions I and II
(memorandum dated April 27, 1998)
12. COUNTY ATTORNEY
None
13. COMMISSIONERS ITEMS
A. Chairman John W Ti
ppin
B. Vice Chairman Kenneth R. Macht
C. Commissioner Fran B. Adams
D. Commissioner Carolyn K. Eggert
E. Commissioner Caroline D. Ginn
u
BACKUP
PAGES
59-62
63-77
78-111
60�;� FAGS Q4
14.
15.
16.
SPECIAL DISTRICTSBOARDS
A. Em-- sMegne}' Services District
1. Approval of Minutes - meeting of 3/17/98
BACKUP
PAGES
2. Authorization to Sole Source Purchase Two
Demo Pierce Saber Pumpers from Ten -8 Fire
Equipment, Inc., on an Emergency Basis due
to their Unsafe Condition and to Remove from
Service Two Existing Pumpers; Approval to
Execute a Purchase Agreement for Two Addi-
tional Saber Pumpers to be Built and Delivered
in October, 1998 due to the Deteriorating Condi-
tion of the Pumpers; and Declare as Surplus the
Pumpers Identified for Replacement
(memorandum dated April 22, 1998) 112-145
3. Authorization to Surplus a 1990 Ford Crown
Victoria
(memorandum dated April 24, 1998) 146
B. Solid Waste Disposal District
1. Approval of Minutes - Meeting of 4/7/98
2. Recycling & Education Grant
Litter Control Grant
Waste Tire Grant
(memorandum dated April 23, 1998) 147-153
C. Environmental Control Board
None
PUBLIC HEARING: Beach Preservation Plan Update
(memorandum dated April 27, 1998)
ADJOURNMENT
154
Anyone who may wish to appeal any decision which may be made at this meeting will need
to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made which includes the testimony and
evidence upon which the appeal will be based
Anyone who needs a special accommodation for this meeting may contact the county's
Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) coordinator at 567-8000 x408 at least 48 hours in advance
of
meeting.
Meeting may be broadcast live on TC1 Cable Channel 13 - rebroadcast various times
throughout the week
Falcon Cable Channel 35 - rebroadcast Friday evening
INDEX TO MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING
OF BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
MAY 5, 1998
1. CALL TO ORDER .............................................. .1-
2. INVOCATION ................................................. -1-
3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ...................................... .1-
4. ADDITIONS TO THE AGENDA ................................... .1-
5. PRESENTATION OF PROCLAMATION DESIGNATING MAY 3-991998 AS
TOURISM WEEK IN INDIAN RIVER COUNTY ..................... .2-
6. APPROVAL OF MINUTES ....................................... .2-
7. CONSENT AGENDA ........................................... .2-
7.A. Reports ................................................. .2-
7.B. Proclamation Designating May ' 10-16, 1998 as National Police Week and
May 11, 1998 as Indian River County Police Memorial Day ........ .2-
7.C. Proclamation Designating January 29, 1999 as Thomas Paine Day in Indian
River County ............................................ .4-
7.D. List of Warrants ............................................ .5-
7.E. Administration Building Telephone Circuit Contract - BellSouth Business
Systems - MegaLink® (ML) Service .......................... .11-
7.F. Tax Cancellations - Recently Acquired Properties - Cumberland Farms (43rd
& Oslo Right -of -Way) - Gary W. Lindsey Et Ux (43`d Avenue Right -of -
Way) .................................................. .12-
7.G. Payments to Vendors of Court Related Costs .................... .17 -
MAY 59 1998
9.A. PUBLIC HEARING - KENNEDY GROVES, INC. - REQUEST TO REZONE
APPROXIMATELY 39.17 ACRES FROM PD (PLANNED DEVELOPMENT
UP TO 3.54 UNITS/ACRE) TO PD (PLANNED DEVELOPMENT UP TO 3.60
UNITS/ACRE) AND TO RECEIVE CONCEPTUAL PD PLAN APPROVAL
FOR A 136 LOT SINGLE-FAMILY PLANNED DEVELOPMENT
............................................................ .18-
9.A. PUBLIC HEARING - BEACH PRESERVATION PLAN UPDATE - TO BE
DISCUSSED UNDER AGENDA ITEM NO. 15
............................................................ .32-
9.C. PUBLIC NOTICE ITEM - ADOPTION OF LATEST EDITION OF NATIONAL
ELECTRICAL CODE (NEC) - PUBLIC HEARING FOR MAY 12, 1998... -32-
11.B. SANDAB COMMUNICATIONS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP II - COUNTY
CONSENT TO ASSIGNMENT OF LICENSE TO PINNACLE TOWERS, INC.
UTILIZING A CONSENT AND ESTOPPEL AGREEMENT ............ .32-
1 l.G.1. AMERON HOMES, INC. - LOT 12, BLOCK 10, VERO LAKE
ESTATES, UNIT NO. 1- REQUEST FOR FLOODPLAIN CUT AND
FILL BALANCE WAIVER ................................ .34-
1 l.G.2. FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT DISTRIBUTION LINE RELOCATION -
KINGS HIGHWAY (58TH AVENUE) IMPROVEMENTS - MAIN RELIEF
CANAL BRIDGE ........................................ .35-
11.11. SEBASTIAN HIGHLANDS WATER EXPANSION PHASE
II -A - RESOLUTIONS I AND 11 .................................. .36-
13.B. VICE CHAIRMAN MACHT - REPORT ON SHOCAP (SERIOUS HABITUAL
OFFENDERS COMPREHENSIVE ACTION PROGRAM) MEETING ..... .45 -
MAY 59 1998
14.A. EMERGENCY SERVICES DISTRICT ............................. -45-
14.B. SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL DISTRICT ............................ .45-
15. PUBLIC HEARING - BEACH PRESERVATION PLAN UPDATE ....... -45-
MAY 59 1998
f LJ8
-3- EOJ ) FAG[ j
May 5, 1998
REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS
The Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida, met in Regular
Session at the County Commission Chambers, 1840 25 h Street, Vero Beach, Florida, on
Tuesday, May 5, 1998, at 9:00 a.m. Present were John W. Tippin, Chairman; Kenneth R
Macht, Vice Chairman; Fran B. Adams; Carolyn K. Eggert; and Caroline D. Ginn. Also
present were James E. Chandler, County Administrator; Charles P. Vitunac, County
Attorney; and Patricia "PT' Jones, Deputy Clerk.
1. CALL TO ORDER
Chairman Tippin called the meeting to order.
2. INVOCATION
Commissioner Ginn delivered the Invocation.
3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Vice Chairman Macht led the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag.
4. ADDITIONS TO THE AGENDA
Vice Chairman Macht requested the addition of Item 13.B., a report on the SHOCAP
(Serious Habitual Offenders Comprehensive Action Program) meeting.
Chairman Tippin announced, under Item 5, the presentation of a Proclamation from
the April 28, 1998 meeting Designating May 3-9, 1998 as Tourism Week in Indian River
County.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams,
SECONDED by Commissioner Eggert, the Board
unanimously added the above items to the Agenda.
MAY 59 1998
05 F'AnWo
5. PRESENTATION OF PROCLAMATION DESIGNATING MAY
3-9,1998 AS TOURISM WEEK IN INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
Chairman Tippin presented the Proclamation from the April 28, 1998 Agenda to
Laurie Burns from the Chamber of Commerce.
6. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
The Chairman asked if there were any corrections or additions to the Minutes of the
Regular Meeting of April 14, 1998. There were none.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert,
SECONDED by Commissioner Ginn, the Board
unanimously approved the Minutes of the Regular
Meeting of April 14, 1998, as written.
7. CONSENT AGENDA
7.A. REPORTS
Received and placed on file in the Office of the Clerk to the Board:
1. Auditor General, State of Florida, Audit of Indian River County District
School Board for FY Ended June 30, 1997.
7.B. PROCLAMATION DESIGNATING MA Y IO -16, 1998 AS NATIONAL POLICE
WEE%AND MAY 11, 1998 AS INDIAN RIVER COUNTYPOLICE
MEMORIAL DAY
The Chairman presented the following Proclamation:
MAY 59 1998
PROCLAMATION
DESIGNATING MAY 10 - MAY 16, 1998
AS NATIONAL POLICE WEEK AND
MAY 11, 1998 AS INDIAN RIVER
COUNTY POLICE MEMORIAL DAY
WHEREAS, the annual observance of National Police Week is May 10
through May 16, 1998 and our county -wide law enforcement agencies are having
their second observance of "Indian River County Police Memorial Day" hosted
by the Indian River County Sheriff's Office on May 11, 1998 at the Indian
River County Courthouse; and
WHEREAS, the law enforcement officers are our guardians of life and
Property, defenders of the individual right to be free men and women,
warriors in the war against crime and dedicated to the preservation of life,
liberty and the pursuit of happiness; and
WHEREAS, Indian River County desires to honor the valor, service and
dedication of its own police officers; and
WHEREAS, it is known that every two days an American police officer
will be killed in the line of duty somewhere in the United States, 136
officers will be seriously assaulted in the performance of their duties, and
our community joins with other cities, towns and counties to honor all peace
officers everywhere:
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT PROCLAIMED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS'
OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA that the week of May 10 through May 16,
1998 be designated as National Police Week and that May 11, 1998 be"
proclaimed
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY POLICE MEMORIAL DAY
and the Board calls upon all the citizens of this community to honor and
show sincere appreciation for police officers by deed, remark and attitude.
The Board further asks our citizens to make every effort to express their
thanks to our men and women who make it possible for us to leave our homes
and family in safety each day and to return to our home's knowing they are
Protected by men and women willing to sacrifice their lives if necessary,
to guard our loved ones, our property and our government against all who
would violate the law.
Adopted this 5 day of May, 1998.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
pohnILTippin,
MAY 59 1998
r
n
Z C. PROCLAMATION DESIGNATING JANUARY 29.1999 As TIYOMAs PAINE
DAYI1yINDIANRIVER COUNTY
The Chairman presented the following Proclamation:
PROCLAMATION
DESIGNATING JANUARY 29,1999
AS "THOMAS PAINE DAY" IN
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
WHEREAS, Thomas Paine crystallized the decision of the Colonies for independence with
his work, "Common Sense"; and
WHEREAS, Thomas Paine supported the revolution through personal service, his fortune and
his inspirational "Crisis Papers"; and
WHEREAS, Thomas Paine was the first to write "The U.S. of America", to suggest a League
of Nations, to promote universal and equal education for boys and girls, equality for women and
religious freedom; and
WHEREAS, his life and work have inspired democratic thinkers all over the world; and
WHEREAS, Thomas Paine was born on January 29, 1737, and the date of January 29 has
been chosen as a date to honor his life and work:
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT PROCLAIMED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA that January 29, 1999 be designated
as the first annual
"THOMAS PAINE DAY"
in Indian River County. The Board urges all citizens of this community to visit the local libraries to
refresh their memories about everything Thomas Paine devoted his time and effort to for the benefit
of all citizens of this country.
Dated this S day of May, 1998.
MAY 59 1998
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
1 i��W ,/ , , -�
-4-
n
_I
ZD. LIST OF WARRANTS
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of April 23, 1998:
TO: HONORABLE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
DATE: APRIL 23, 1998
SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF WARRANTS
FROM: EDWIN M. FRY, JR., FINANCE DIRECTOR
In compliance with Chapter 136.06, Florida Statutes, all warrants issued
by the Board of County Commissioners are to be recorded in the Board minutes.
Approval is requested for the attached list of warrants. issued by the Clerk
to the Board. for the time period of April 20 to April 23. 1998.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Ginn, SECONDED
by Commissioner Eggert, the Board unanimously
approved the list of Warrants as issued by the Clerk
to the Board for the period from April 20, 1998
through April 23, 1998, as recommended by staff.
CHECK
NAME
CHECK
CHECK
NUMBER
DATE
AMOUNT
0019197
WHEELER, GARY SHERIFF
3/02/98
.00
0019359
FLORIDA COMBINED LIFE
4/20/98
1,992.84
0019360
TEAMSTERS LOCAL UNION NO 769
4/20/98
3,670.98
0019361
COURTYARD BY MARRIOTT
4/21/98
208.00
0225939
NORTHEAST REGIONAL AGRICUL,TURL
7/17/97
.00
0237423
BRITTON, JUDITH
2/12/98
.00
0238862
SHERATON HARBOR PLACE
3/12/98
.00
0239722
SMITH & SMITH, PA TRUST ACCT
3/26/98
.00
0239999
FLORIDA LIBRARY ASSOCIATION
4/02/98
t: .00
0240053
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY SOLID
4/02/98
L .00
0240206
QUILLEN, DOROTHY
4/02/98
Jt .00
0240207
FOLEY, JAMES
4/02/98
\/ .00
0240208
ATKINS, MARY J
4/02/98
.00
0240209
DANSEREAU, PAULINE
4/02/98
.00
0240365
KEEP AMERICA BEAUTIFUL
4/09/98
.00
0240722
POSTMASTER #216
4/16/98
.00
0240865
ENNIS, WAYNE & SYLVIA
4/16/98
.00
0240866
ACTION TRANSMISSION AND
4/23/98
1,447.52
0240867
ADRON FENCE COMPANY
4/23/96
142.50
0240868
AERO PRODUCTS CORPORATION
4/23/98
1,182.22
0240871
APPLE MACHINE & SUPPLY CO
4/23/98
320.67
0240872
AT YOUR SERVICE
4/23/98
1,911.20
0240873
ATCO TOOL SUPPLY
4/23/98
55.34
0240874
AUTO SUPPLY CO OF VERO BEACH,
4/23/98
904.96
0240875
AEROSPACE EXPRESS
4/23/98
68.25
0240877
ALL RITE WATER CONDITIONING
4/23/98
100.00
0240878
ALLIED ELECTRONICS, INC
4/23/98
135.96
0240880
ALLIED MEDICAL SERVICES
4/23/98
30.70
0240882
ASHWORTH INC
4/23/98
642.57
0240883
ALL COUNTY EQUIPMENT COMPANY
4/23/98
43.20
0240884
AUTO PARTS OF VERO, INC
4/23/98
323.80
MAY 59 1998
CHECK
NAME
CHECK
CHECK
HUMBER
DATE
AMOUNT
0240885
ARCHITECTS & DESIGNERS
4/23/98
187.79
0240886
ALL AMERICAN CONCRETE
4/23/98
44,716.34
0240887
BAKER DISTRIBUTING W
4/23/98
434.75
0240888
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
4/23/98
4,498.17
0240891
BELLSOUTH MOBILITY
4/23/98
16.94
0240892
BARTON, JEFFREY R -CLERK
4/23/98
5,397.00
0240894
BERGGREN EQUIPMENT CO, INC
4/23/98
3,942.78
0240895
B & 8 INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY CO.
4/23/98
808.64
0240896
BRIDGESTONE SPORTS, INC
4/23/98
276.12
0240897
BARTON, JEFFREY K
4/23/98
2,547.30
0240898
BRODART CO
4/23/98
6,135.07
0240900
BLATUS, JAMES
4/23/98
704.02
0240902
BILLING SERVICES INC
4/23/98
36.51
0240904
BPI MEDICAL WASTE SYSTEMS
4/23/98
115.50
0240905
BARER & TAYLOR &INMENT
4/23/98
195.34
0240906
BELLSOUTH
4/23/98
21,751.19
0240907
BOLLE AMERICA, INC
4/23/98
414.95
0240908
BLUE CROSS/BLUE SHIELD OF
4/23/98
8,184.00
0240909
BET -1 -SOUTH PUBLIC COMMUNICATION
4/23/98
274.17
0240910
BAKER & TAYLOR INC
4/23/98
1,910.77
0240911
BMG
4/23/98
50.55
0240912
CTL DISTRIBUTION INC
4/23/98
615.00
0240913
BETTER BOOKS COMPANY
4/23/98
44.44
0240914
CAMERON & BARKLEY COMPANY
4/23/98
331.07
0240915
CAMP, DRESSER & MCKEE, INC
4/23/98
17,000.00
0240916
CARTER ASSOCIATES, INC
4/23/98
34,416.62
0240917
CENTRAL WINDOW OF
4/23/98
1,005.50
0240918
CHATAM, KENNETH
4/23/98
341.87
0240919
CHUCK'S ELECTRIC MOTORS, INC
4/23/98
286.00
0240920
CLEMENTS PEST CONTROL
4/23/98
19.00
0240921
COLD AIR DISTRIBUTORS
4/23/98
383.26
0240922
COLKITT SHEET METAL & AIR, INC
4/23/98
36.38
0240923
COLLINS, WILLIAM G II
4/23/98
47.00
0240924
COMMUNICATIONS INT'L INC
4/23/98
1,022.70
0240926
COPELAND, LINDA
4/23/98
80.50
0240927
CAPP CUSTOM BUILDERS, INC
4/23/98
500.00
0240928
CUSTOM CARRIAGES, INC
4/23/98
272.16
0240929
CHIVERS NORTH AMERICA
4/23/98
44.64
0240931
CRITIC'S CHOICE VIDEO
4/23/98
36.77
0240932
CENTRAL PUMP & SUPPLY INC
4/23/98
165.87
0240934
CENTER FOR EMOTIONAL AND
4/23/98
228.00
0240936
COLUMBIA HOUSE
4/23/98
114.18
0240937
CUMMINS, CHERYL
4/23/98
24.00
0240939
CONSOLIDATED RESOURCE RECOVERY
4/23/98
52,866.74
0240941
CHEVRON
4/23/98
13.40
0240942
COMPUTYPE, INC
4/23/98
709.49
0240944
DAVIS, JAMES
4/23/96
8.12
0240947
DELTA SUPPLY CO
4/23/98
1,807.82
0240949
DEPENDABLE DODGE, INC
4/23/98
98.79
0240950
DICRERSON-FLORIDA, INC
4/23/98
337,698.80
0240951
DICKEY SCALES, INC
4/23/98
725.00
0240953
DOCTOR'S CLINIC
4/23/98
1,595.14
0240954
DON SMITH'S PAINT STORE, INC
4/23/98
385.55
0240955
DISCOUNT AUTO PARTS
4/23/98
10.97
0240956
DOTY, GENE
4/23/98
30.90
0240957
DAVIDSON TITLES, INC
4/23/98
17.96
0240958
D'ANGLEO, LEONARDO
4/23/98
43.14
0240959
DISNEY'S CORONADO SPRINGS
4/23/98
250.00
0240960
DADE PAPER COMPANY
4/23/98
538.71
0240961
DILLARD, CASSIS
4/23/98
33.48
0240962
DOCTORS' CLINIC
4/23/98
72.00
0240963
DETKO, CATHY
4/23/98
55.00
0240964
E -Z BREW COFFEE SERVICE, INC
4/23/98
82.40
0240965
ENVIROMETRICS, INC
4/23/98
389.50
0240966
EBSCO SUBSCRIPTION SERVICES
4/23/98
49.38
0240967
EDWARDS, GARRY PHD
4/23/98
550.00
0240969
EMBASSY SUITES HOTEL
4/23/98
395.00
0240970
EDLUND & DRITENBAS
4/23/98
865.70
0240971
ELLIOTT BUSINESS MACHINES. INC
4/23/98
79.40
0240973
ECOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC
4/23/98
612.32
0240974
ECKERD DRUG CO
4/23/98
27.22
0240975
EMERGENCY SERVICES CONSULTING
4/23/98
145.00
0240976
FISHER SCIENTIFIC COMPANY
4/23/98
125.70
0240977
FLORIDA COCA-COLA BOTTLING CO
4/23/98
646.65
0240978
FPL
4/23/98
37,731.48
0240979
FRASER ENGINEERING & TESTING
4/23/98
600.00
0240980
FOOT JOY '
4/23/98
147.13
0240981
FLORIDA TIRE RECYCLING, INC
4/23/98
1,841.40
0240982
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS
4/23/98
5,009.59
0240983
FELLSMERE, CITY OR�
4/23/96
18.93
0240984
FALZONE, KATHY
4/23/98
78.04
0240985
FALZONE, MATTHEW
4/23/98
36.05
MAY 59 1998
-6-
•
CHECK NAME
CHECK
CHECK
NUMBER
DATE
AMOUNT
0240986 FALZONE, CHRISTOPHER
4/23/98
4/23/98
36.05
100.00
0240987 FLORIDA AMATEUR
4/23/98_
65.00
0240988 FLORIDA RECORDS MANAGEMENT
150.00
0240989 FLORIDA FIRE INSPECTORS ASSOC
4/23/98
835.50
0240990 FIRST UNION NATIONAL BANK
4/23/98
103.63
0240991 GAYLORD BROTHERS, INC
4/23/98
535.00
0240992 GENE'S AUTO GLASS
4/23/98
144.08
0240993 GENERAL MEDICAL CORP
4/23/98
850.29
0240994 GOODYEAR AUTO SERVICE CENTER
4/23/98
284.97
0240995 GALE RESEARCH, INC
4/23/98
125.00
0240996 GOVERNOR'S HURRICANE
4/23/98
2,019.20
0240997 GOODYEAR COMMERCIAL TIRE &
4/23/98
88.63
0240998 GINN, CAROLINE D
4/23/98
24.00
0240999 GOLF CARS OF VERO' INC
4/23/98
80.00
0241000 GLASER, A J III, LPN
4/23/98
81.00
0241001 H W WILSON CO
4/23/98
1,098.60
0241002 HARRIS SANITATION, INC
4/23/96
9,050.00
0241003 HECTOR TURF, INC
4/23/98
195.00
0241004 HI -TECH SERVICING TECH'NS
4/23/98
1,000.00
0241005 HOLIDAY BUILDERS, INC
4/23/98
1,457.00
0241006 HOWARD FERTILIZER CO, INC
4/23/98
179.75
0241007 HACH COMPANY
4/23/98
64.50
0241006 HIGGINSON BOOK CO
4/23/98
47,406.26
0241009 HARRIS SANITATION, INC
4/23/98
28.00
0241010 FIAItTSFIELD, CELESTE L
4/23/98
182.91
0241011 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY SOLID
4/23/98
890.00
0241012 INSTRUMENTATION SERVICES, INC
4/23/98
12.79
0241013 INDIAN RIVER ACE HARDWARE
4/23/98
831.00
0241014 INDIAN RIVER BATTERY, INC
4/23/98
94.34
0241015 INDIAN RIVER BLUE PRINT, INC
4/23/98
490.84
0241016 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY UTILITY
4/23/98
2,362.11
0241017 INGRAM
4/23/98
147.00
0241018 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY HOSPITAL
RIVER MEMORIAL
4/23/98
233.45
0241019 INDIAN
0241020 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
4/23/98
1,032.44
46.00
0241021 IBM CORP-DVV
4/23/98
4/23/98
126.07
0241022 INDIAN RIVER ALL -FAB, INC
4/23/98
102,260.66
0241023 IRC EMPLOYEE HEALTH INSURANCE-
1,079.55
0241024 IKON OFFICE SOLUTIONS
4/23/98
470.72
0241025 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY ALLIANCE
4/23/98
0241026 IRRIGATION CONSULTANTS UNLIMIT
4/23/98
78.52
0241027 INDIAN RIVER BAND
4/23/98
4/23/98
442.40
43.35
0241028 JACKSON ELECTRONICS
4/23/98
430.40
0241029 JANIE DEAN CHEVROLET, INC
4/23/98
316.09
0241030 JUDGE, JAMES A II
0241031 J R REPORTING ASSOCIATES, INC
4/23/98
25.00
0241032 JOELSON CONCRETE PIPE COMPANY
4/23/98
698.72
0241033 JAMEISON PUBLISHERS
4/23/98
4/23/98
542.50
7,666.44
0241034 JONES CHEMICALS, INC
4/23/98
398.00
0241035 JEMS CC04MUNICATIONS
4/23/98
689.66
0241036 KING, JOHN W
4/23/98
35.67
0241037 KNIGHT & MATHIS, INC
4/23/98
186.00
0241038 KELLY TRACTOR CO
4/23/98
836.36
0241039 KIRBY AUTO SUPPLY
4/23/98
6.99
0241040 KT MOWER & EQUIPMENT
4/23/98
1,023.00
0241041 KLINK, RICHARD
0241042 KING REPORTING SERVICE, INC
4/23/98
199.00
0241043 KELLY, JULIE ANN
4/23/98
103.25
85.92
0241044 ROMARINETZ, SUSAN
4/23/98
4/23/98
14,100.00
0241045 LONG, JAMES T ESQUIRE
4/23/98
406.32
0241046 LOWE'S HOME CENTERS, INC
4/23/98
216.44
0241047 L B SMITH, INC
0241048 LIGHT SOURCE BUSINESS SYSTEMS
4/23/98
840.01
0241049 LFI VERO BEACH, INC
4/23/98
1,470.40
539.65
0241050 LESCO, INC
4/23/98
4/23/98
49.50
0241051 LAPSCO INC
4/23/98
1,087.50
0241052 LUCENT TECHNOLOGIES
4/23/98
10,167.13
0241053 LOGISTIC SYSTEMS, INC
4/23/98
710.85
0241055 MCCOLLUM, NATHAN
0241056 MID COAST TIRE SERVICE, INC
4/23/98
34.95
0241058 MOODY TIRE, INC
4/23/98
4/23/98
71.00
11,225.10
0241059 MUNICIPAL SUPPLY &
4/23/96
20,127.00
0241063 MASTELLER & MOLER, INC
4/23/98
66.44
0241064 MEDICAL RECORD SERVICES, INC
4/23/98
114.29
0241065 MCMASTER-CARR SUPPLY COMPANY
0241066 MARCO ISLAND MARRIOTT
4/23/96
495.00
0241068 MANTZ ELECTRIC
4/23/98
2,795.00
0241070 MIDWEST TAPE EXCHANGE
4/23/98
152.45
0241071 M C B COLLECTION SERVICES
4/23/98
205.08
0241072 MR BOB PORTABLE TOILET
4/23/98
228.36
0241073 MARC INDUSTRIES
4/23/98
367.93
0241075 MGB CONSTRUCTION INC
4/23/98
500.00
0241076 MAX DAVIS ASSOCIATES INC
4/23/98
142.28
MAY 591998
-7-
c o,Y
J J Fc
MAY 591998
0 g •
CHECK
CHECK
CHECK NAME
DATE
AMOUNT
NUMBER
4/23/98
38.95
0241078 MASTER'S ECONOMY INN
4/23/98
144.01
0241079 NEFF MACHINERY' INC
4/23/98
170.00
0241080 N A C A
4/23/98
67.16
0241082 NATIONAL PROPANE CORP
4/23/98
32.28
0241084 OFFICE PRODUCTS & SERVICE
4/23/98
688.80
0241085 OFFICE PRODUCTS & SERVICE
4/23/98
133.00
0241086 OSCEOLA, MEDICAL SUPPLY
4/23/98
2,039.14
0241087 OXFORD UNIVERSITY PRESS
0241089 O'NEIL, LEE & WEST
4/23/98
4/23/98
9,474.84
298.00
0241091 PARKS RENTAL INC
4/23/98
76.50
0241093 PEPSI -COLA BOTTLING GROUP
4/23/98
10,000.00
0241096 POSTMASTER 6216
4/23/98
500.00
0241097 PROCTOR CONSTRUCTION
4/23/98
9,056.99
0241098 PHYSIO CONTROL
4/23/98
10,000.00
0241099 POSTMASTER 6216
4/23/98
1,508.53
0241101 PORT PETROLEUM, INC
4/23/98
109.42
0241102 PLEZALL WIPERS. INC
4/23/98
347.98
0241104 PRESS JOURNAL
4/23/98
30.00
0241105 PINEWOODS ANIMAL HOSPITAL
4/23/98
105.08
0241106 POLLARD CO
4/23/98
215.30
0241107 PRAXAIR DISTRIBUTION
4/23/98
116.58
0241108 pOWERLINE CHEMICAL & JANITOR
4/23/98
895.00
0241110 PROJECT DELIVERY INSTITUTE
4/23/98
85.00
0241113 RADISSON PLAZA HOTEL
4/23/98
1,000.00
0241114 RIFKIN, SHELDON H PHD
4/23/98
993.37
0241117 RED VALVE COMPANY
4/23/98
670.00
0241118 ROSSWAY, BRADLEY W ESQ•
4/23/98
2,945.00
0241120 RELIABLE TRANSMISSION SERVICE
4/23/98
138.89
0241122 RICER, JACOB M
4/23/98
75.00
0241123 SALVATION ARMY
4/23/98
497.44
0241126 SCOTTY'S, INC
0241127 SEBASTIAN BUSINESS SUPPLY, INC
4/23/98
71.84
329.50
0241128 SEWELL HARDWARE CO, INC
4/23/98
4/23/98
557.56
0241129 SHELL OIL COMPANY
4/23/98
5,255.52
0241130 SOUTHERN CULVERT, DIV OF
4/23/98
779.85
0241131 SOUTHERN EAGLE DISTRIBUTING,
4/23/98
5,285.21
0241133 STATE OF FLORIDA
4/23/98
300.00
0241134 STONE BROS FUNERAL HOME
4/23/9
21,532.50
0241135 SHELTRA & SON CONSTRUCTION
4/23/986
133.50
0241136 SERVICE REFRIOERATION CO, INC
4/23/98
21.17
0241138 SHERWOOD, FRANCES G
4/23/98
462.06
0241139 JA SEXAUER INC
4/23/98
375.00
0241142 SCHWARZ, BERTHOLD E MD
4123/98
80.00
0241143 SEXTON, HILDY
0241144 SUN BELT MEDICAL SUPPLY, INC
4/23/98
787.70
20,327.80
0241146 SCOTAD, INC
4/23/98
4/23/98
679.96
0241147 SHELDON, JAMES
4/23/98
867.14
0241148 SYSCO FOOD SERVICES OF
4/23/98
8,907.83
0241149 STEWART MINING INDUSTRIES INC
4/23/98
3,130.00
0241152 ST LUCIE COUNTY
4/23/98
500.00
0241153 SCHLITT, MICHAEL
4/23/98
43.00
0241154 STM COMPANY
4/23/98
880.00
0241155 SOUTHERN SECURITY SYSTEMS OF
4/23/98
18.66
0241156 SHORE -LINE CARPET SUPPLIES OF
4/23/98
741.93
0241158 SMITH & NEPHEW INC
4/23/98
1,896.48
0241161 SKOK, EUGENE
FROM A14MTECH
4/23/98
86.46
0241162 SECUltITYLINK
0241163 TEN -8 FIRE EQUIPMENT, INC
4123/98
942.58
399.19
0241165 TITLEIST DRAWER
4/23/98
0241166 TRADEWINNDS BEACH RESORT
4/23/98
190.00
31,762.96
0241167 TREASURE COAST REFUSE CORP
4/23/98
4/23/98
12,611.17
0241168 TINDALE OLIVER & ASSOC" INC
4/23/98
42.00
0241172 TRI -COUNTY GAS
4/23/98
678.00
0241173 TRUGREEN CHEMLAWN
4/23/98
198.46
0241174 TRANSIT AIR CONDITIONING
4/23/98
352.00
0241177 TREASURE CHEST COMPUTERS
4/23/98
27,000-00
0241178 U S ARMY ENGINEER WATERWAYS
11,618.53
0241179 IIS FILTER DISTRIBUTION GROUP
4�23�98
102.00
0241180 VERO BEACH, CITY OF
4/23/98
23,690.11
0241181 VERO BEACH, CITY OF
4/23/98
944.22
0241182 VERO BEACH, CITY OF
CHEMICAL DISTRIBUTORS INC
4/23/98
61.90
0241183 VERO
4/23/98
502.25
0241184 VERO BEARING & BOLT
4/23/98
50.00
0241185 VOLUNTEER ACTION CENTER
4/23/98
150.00
0241186 VANBURGER, BILL
4/23/98
53.54
0241187 WAL-MART STORES, INC
BOOK EDUCATIONAL PRODUCT
4/23/98
750.00
0241188 WORLD
4/23/98
181.69
0241189 W W GRAINGER, INC
4/23/98
560.00
0241190 WQOL FM
4/23/98
97.38
0241191 WAL-MART PHARMACY, INC
4/23/98
250.10
0241192 WILLIAM THIES &-SONS, INC
4/23/98
70.25
0241193 WATERWORKS CAR WASH
4/23/98
356.00
0241194 WYNDHAM HARBOUR ISLAND HOTEL
MAY 591998
0 g •
•
CHECK
NAME
CHECK
CHECK
NUMBER
DATE
AMOUNT
0241195
WOLFE, MEGAN
4/23/98
30.90
0241196
WBBE-FM
4/23/98
400.00
0241197
WORLDCOM
4/23/98
36.58
0241198
WOLFE, ERIN
4/23/98
30.90
0241199
WELTER-WESTON CHIROPRACTIC
4/23/98
506.70
0241200
XEROX CORPORATION
4/23/98
1,757.48
0241201
ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE
4/23/98
84.41
0241202
ZIMMERMANN, KARL
4/23/98
8,667.42
0241203
RODDENBERRY, ALFRED
4/23/98
258.41
0241204
LETTS, BRIAN
4/23/98
299.87
0241205
KEMP, HAROLD
4/23/98
308.92
0241206
WARD JR, CHARLES
4/23/98
249.92
0241207
BRANDON CAPITAL CORP
4/23/98
7.50
0241208
PRYOR SR, ELIGHA
4/23/98
77.20
0241209
LESTICIER, ADMARIE
4/23/98
54.52
0241210
KERRN, RUSSELL & ANNE
4/23/98
58.16
0241211
HARKNESS, JEANNE R
4/23/98
68.04
0241212
GRANITO, LOIS
4/23/98
.3.61
0241213
WINDSOR PROPERTIES
4/23/98
36.28
0241214
WRIGHT, J T
4/23/98
48.99
0241215
TAYLOR, STEVEN
4/23/98
39.01
0241216
AUSBY, LAKEISHA
4/23/98
27.18
0241217
TIPTON, DELBERT S
4/23/98
35.10
0241218
ENNIS, WAYNE & SYLVIA
4/23/98
5.26
0241219
TORRE, JANE
4/23/98
28.82
0241220
KUENLE, GORDON & DOLORES
4/23/98
38.74
0241221
YOUNG, ROBERT P
4/23/98
31.37
0241222
COKER, ENID E
4/23/98
60.34
0241223
GANGLOFF, ROBERT & TERESA
4/23/98
40.57
0241224
SPENSER, BEULAH M
4/23/98
52.75
0241225
KEVIN 3 HAWKINS INC
4/23/98
13.89
0241226
HAYWOOD HOMES
4/23/98
6.67
0241227
CORNERSTONE SELECT HOMES INC
4/23/98
12.48
0241228
CHRISTIAN, BARBARA
4/23/98
6.08
0241229
LACKEY, STEVE
4/23/98
37.21
0241230
GROZA BUILDERS INC
4/23/98
27.85
0241231
BEAZER HOMES FLORIDA INC
4/23/98
70.77
0241232
CARROLL, MICHELLE y
4/23/98
33.96
0241233
NALBANTOGLU, ARTIN
4/23/98
7.69
0241234
CARTER, SANDRA
4/23/98
51.18
0241235
WITHEY, PATSY
4/23/98
77.25
0241236
KENNA, RICHARD J
4/23/98
67.63
0241237
MC LEAN, JEANNE M
4/23/98
25.31
0241238
TABBERT, JAMES W
4/23/98
9.76
0241239
HUTTON, JOHN SCOTT
4/23/98
99.29
0241240
GASKIN JR, THOMAS & TINA GAIL
4/23/98
88.74
0241241
BRANDT JR, DALE A
4/23/98
35.71
0241242
KEY JR, CHARLES P
4/23/98
21.23
0241243
SEELEY JR, JOHN
4/23/98
52.50
0241244
BOULANGER, ROBERT W
4/23/98
52.50
0241245
COUGHLIN, JAMES T
4/23/98
52.50
0241246
DONATELLI, E JUDITH
4/23/98
105.00
0241247
PROVOST, CLIFFORD J
4/23/98
105.00
0241248
ANDERSON, FRED
4/23/98
123.00
0241249
ATKINSON, RICHARD F
4/23/98
309.00
0241250
BECHT, TONYA AND CITY OF VERO
4/23/98
70.00
0241251
BRO%TON, LYDIA
4/23/98
206.00
0241252
HOLDEN, MICHELLE AND
4/23/98
21.00
0241253
BEUTTELL, PETER M
4/23/98
272.00
0241254
BILKEN GROUP
4/23/98
1,029.00
0241255
BEANS, ROBERT
4/23/98
267.00
0241256
BELL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT
4/23/98
1,643.00
0241257
BOUYSSOU, STEPHANE H
4/23/98
319.00
0241258
BROOKS, DEAUNDRA AND CITY OF
4/23/98
50.00
0241259
BLAHNIK, CHRIS OR MILDRED
4/23/98
199.00
0241260
BROOKHAVEN, TOWN OF
4/23/98
558.97
0241261
BREVARD COUNTY HOUSING AUTHRTY
4/23/98
813.94
0241262
BROWN, HUBERT OR LOLA
4/23/98
355.00
0241263
BROOKS, HAROLD L JR
4/23/98
349.00
0241264
BEAUREGARD, KELLY AND CITY OF
4/23/98
59.00
0241265
BAYLES, DENNIS
4/23/98
303.00
0241266 CARTWRIGHT, WILLIAM AND/
4/23/98
168.00
0241267 CARR, RHODA L
4/23/98
292.00
0241268 COLLINS, THOMAS H
4/23/98
539.00
0241269 COSCO, KEN
4/23/98
347.00
0241270 CARLTON, ALLAN R
4/23/98
256.00
0241271 C P E ASSOCIATES
4/23/98
1,439.00
0241272 CAPAR, GERALD T
4/23/98
335.00
0241273 CUMMINGS, JERRY
4/23/98
0241274 CALMES, JOHN W
4/23/98
418.00
0241275 CARLUCCI, LEONARD A
4/23/98
389.00
0241276 DAN PREUSS REALTY, INC
4/23/98
361.00
333.00
MAY 59 1998
542
EOOK
•
MAY 5, 1998
-10-
CHECK
NAME
NUMBER
CHECK
CHECK
DATE
AMOUNT
0241277
DOOLITTLE AND ASSOCIATES
4/23/98
1,539.00
0241278
D'HAESELEER, GAYLE OR RONALD
4/23/98
219.00
0241279
DEAN, JAMES
4/23/98
299.00
0241280
DENNISON, WANDA
4/23/98
827.00
0241281
DOVE, E WILSON
4/23/98
299.00
0241282
DOYLE, DON
4/23/98
307.00
0241283
DORSETT, DONNELLA
4/23/98
30.00
0241284
ELWELL, JACQUELINE & F P & L
4/23/98
4.00
0241285
EDGEWOOD PLACE (305-113)
4/23/98
215.00
0241286
FOGERTY, GEORGE A
4/23/98
323.00
0241287
FRESH, DANIEL J
4/23/98
195.00
0241288
FT PIERCE, CITY OF
4/23/98
1,442.91
0241289
FOGARTY INTERPRISES, INC
4/23/98
380.00
0241290
GILLESPIE, JOHN AND/OR GWEN
4/23/98
418.00
0241291
GASRILL, ROBERT
4/23/98
249.00
0241292
GRIMM, FLOYD OR HELEN
4/23/98
151.00
0241293
GIFFORD GROVES, LTD
4/23/98
8,607.00
0241294
GEORGE, MARY KIM
4/23/98
575.00
0241295
GATCBELL, JOSEPHINE AND CITY
4/23/98
78.00
0241296
GRACE'S LANDING LTD
4/23/98
607.00
0241297
HICKMAN, CARLA & F P & L
4/23/98
43.00
0241298
HILL, C J
4/23/98
927.00
0241299
HAWKINS, WANDA
4/23/98
220.00
0241300
HERAN, SHAUNA
4/23/98
309.00
0241301
HUNT, MARY
4/23/98
35.00
0241302
INDIAN RIVER INVESTMENT
4/23/98
556.00
0241303
IMBRIANI, VINCENT
4/23/98
279.00
0241304
JAMES A DOOLITTLE & ASSOCIATES
4/23/98
9,185.00
0241305
JENSEN, PETER C
4/23/98
528.00
0241306
JONES, MARCUS
4/23/98
181.00
0241307
JONES, DOROTHY
4/23/96
10.00
0241308
JENNINGS, LESSIE
4/23/98
413.00
0241309
JULIN, PAUL
4/23/98
210.00
0241310
JONES, WILLIAM C
4/23/98
337.00
0241311
JONES, ALPHONSO
4/23/98
222.00
0241312
KAHLE, ESTHER
4/23/98
258.00
0241313
KOLB, GREGORY L
4/23/98
433.00
0241314
LAWRENCE, TERRY A
4/23/98
200.00
0241315
LLERENA, E D
4/23/98
582.00
0241316
LOFTON, BERTHA
4/23/98
272.00
0241317
LANGLEY, PHILIP G
4/23/98
791.00
0241318
LABELLA, ARTHUR
4/23/98
300.00
0241319
LANDERS, VIVIEN BONELLI
4/23/98
13.00
0241320
L & S MANAGEMENT
4/23/98
475.00
0241321
MI70rLL, LLONALD AND/OR
4/23/98
570.00
0241322
M O D INVESTMENTS
4/23/98
1,240.00
0241323
MONTGOMERY, WILLIAM
4/23/98
210.00
0241324
MANN, ROBERT OR WANDA ARMA
4/23/98
217.00
0241325
MALGERIA, PRISCILLA
4/23/98
419.00
0241326
MORRILL, TINA AND CITY OF
4/23/98
34.00
0241327
MILLER, ALVIN L
4/23/98
375.00
0241328
MCINTOSH, SYLVESTER B JR
4/23/98
498.00
0241329
MULLINS, B FRANK
4/23/98
325.00
0241330
NELSON, DONALD J & VALENTINE R
4/23/98
500.00
0241331
NEUHAUSER, ERNEST
4/23/98
273.00
0241332
O'CONNOR, DANIEL T & DEIDRA E
4/23/98
418.00
0241333
OLIVER, DOROTHY
4/23/98
193.00
0241334
ORANGE COUNTY HOUSING AND
4/23/98
604.97
0241335
PARKER, RALPH & CITY OF VERO
4/23/98
77.00
0241336
PIUMELLI, DOMENICA
4/23/98
533.00
0241337
PALMER TRAILER PARR
4/23/98
415.00
0241338
POLLY, EMMA
4/23/98
348.00
0241339
PIERSON, JOHN H DBA
4/23/98
324.00
0241340
POSADO, LORI
4/23/98
322.00
0241341
PINKNEY, RACHEL J
4/23/98
151.00
0241342
PALUMBO, LOUIS
4/23/98
335.00
0241343
REAGAN, WILLIE C
4/23/98
828.00
0241344
RENNICK, RONALD
4/23/98
271.00
0241345
RAUDENBUSH, ERNEST
4/23/98
121.00
0241346
REALTY CONNECTIONS OF VERO,INC
4/23/98
1,215.00
0241347
REARDANZ, MARVIN
4/23/98
408.00
0241348
RICHARDS, WILLIAM A
4/23/98
651.00
0241349
RODRIGUEZ, BLANCA
4/23/98
504.00
0241350
RICOTTI, RICARDO
4/23/98
282.00
0241351
SCHORNER, JAMES A
4/23/98
115.00
0241352
ST FRANCIS MANOR
4/23/98
2,740.00
0241353
SCROGGS, BETTY DAVIS
4/23/98
327.00
0241354
S B M RENTALS, INC
4/23/98
111.00
0241355
SACCO, JACQUELINE AND/OR
4/23/98
458.00
0241356
SORIANO, RAFAEL
4/23/98
257.00
0241357
SABONJOHN, FLORENCE
4/23/98
327.00
0241358
SANFORD HOUSING AUTHORITY
4/23/98
506.97
0241359
SMOAK, JEANETTE AND CITY
4/23/98
34.00
MAY 5, 1998
-10-
•
CHECK
NAME
CHECK
CHECK
NUMBER
DATE
AMOUNT
0241360
SANDY PINES
4/23/98
2,428.00
0241361
SHELTON; ROBERT L
4/23/98
505.00
0241362
STARCK, MICHAEL R
4/23/98
117.00
0241363
SQUIRES, STEPHANIE A
4/23/98
317.00
0241364
SPEARS, PRISCILLA AND CITY OF
4/23/98
15.00
0241365
SPIRES, TISA AND CITY OF VERO
4/23/98
26.00
0241366
STRIBLING, WILLIAM JR
4/23/98
773.00
0241367
SUNDMAN, IVAN
4/23/98
203.00
0241368
SMITH, MARILYN
4/23/98
19.00
0241369
SARTAIN, CHARLES S & TELECIA
4/23/98
375.00
0241370
SANDERS, NATALIE
4/23/98
123.00
0241371
TROPICAL SHORELAND, INC OR
4/23/96
243.00
0241372
TROW, KENNETH
4/23/98
551.00
0241373
TOLBERT, JEANETTE
4/23/98
58.00
0241374
ULISRY, WILLIAM B OR MARLENE
4/23/98
431.00
0241375
VERO MOBILE HOME PARK
4/23/98
420.00
0241376
VOLF VILCEK, JULIANNA
4/23/98
265.00
0241377
VERO FIRST CORPORATION
4/23/98
1,498.00
0241378
BLAKE, SALLIE (WYNN)
4/23/98
285.00
0241379
WILLIAMS, TOBIAS M
4/23/98
401.00
0241380
WILLIAMS, DEBRA WASHINGTON
4/23/98
125.00
0241381
WEBB, DONNA
4/23/98
162.00
0241382
YORK, LILLY B
4/23/98
202.00
0241383
YORK, DAVID
4/23/98
464.00
0241384
ZANCA, LEONARD
4/23/98
666.00
0241385
ZORC, RICHARD J
4/23/98
232.00
1,203,698.93
7.E. ADMINISTRATIONBUILDING TELEPHONE CIRCUIT CONTRACT -
BELLSOUTHBUSINESS SYSTEMS - MEGALINK® (MLS SERVICE
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of April 28, 1998:
Date: April 28, 1998
To: Honorable Board of County Commissioners
Through: James E. Chandler
County Administrator
Through: H.T. "Sonny" Dean,
Department of General Services
From: Terry L. Smith, Telecommunications Manager ZS
Department of General Services
Subject: Administration Building Telephone Circuit Contract
BACKGROUND:
With the new PBX being Placed in the County Administration Building, it is possible to
use a different kind of circuit for outgoing calls; changing to this circuit will save the
County $204.39 per month when compared to what we are now paying for out out -dial
PBX trunks. The attached contract is for 49 months so that we can take advantage of
better Pricing than what is offered for a shorter contract. BellSouth has verified that if
we move the circuit to our new building before the term of the contract is fulfilled, that
does not constitute a breech of the contract and the original time obligation remains
unchanged
MAY 59 1998
-11-
J
•
Current Cost of Trunks Proposed Cost of Trunks
Megalink Charge $427.05
Trunk Charge $1169.28 $537.84
Total Monthly Charge $1169.28 $964.89
One-time installation Charge $1,674.00
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the attached Service Agreement be signed by Board of County
Commissioners to finalize this business arrangement with BellSouth
ON MOTION by Commissioner Ginn, SECONDED
by Commissioner Eggert, the Board unanimously
approved the Service Agreement with BellSouth
Business Systems to provide MegaLink® (ML)
service and authorized the Chairman to execute
same, as recommended by staff.
AGREEMENT WILL BE ON FILE IN THE OFFICE
OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
WHEN EXECUTED AND RECEIVED
7.F. TAX CANCELLATIONS - RECENTLYACQUIRED PROPERTIES -
CUMBERLAND FARMS (43RD & OSLO RIGHT=OF-WAY) - GARY W.
LnvDSEYET UX (43'x° AVENUE RIGHT-OF-WAY)
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of April 27, 1998:
TO: Board of County Commissioners
FROM: Lea R. Keller, CLA
Legal Assistant - County Attorney's Office
DATE: April 27, 1998
RE: 2 Recently Acquired Properties - Tax Cancellations
The County recently acquired some property and, pursuant to Section 196.28, F.S., the
Board of County Commissioners is allowed to cancel and discharge any taxes owed on the
portion of the property acquired for public purpose. Such cancellation must be done by
resolution with a certified copy being forward to the Tax Collector (along with copies sent to
the Property Appraiser and Fixed Assets).
Reauested Action: Board authorize the Chairman to sign the attached resolutions canceling
taxes upon lands the County recently acquired.
MAY 59 1998
.j rA6C `t.W
-12 0
-
•
ON MOTION by Commissioner Ginn, SECONDED
by Commissioner Eggert, the Board unanimously
adopted Resolution 98-053 cancelling certain
delinquent taxes upon publicly owned lands,
pursuant to Section 196.28, Florida Statutes
(Cumberland Farms - 43'd & Oslo R/W).
Re: RNV - 43rd & Oslo
Parcel IN #23-33-39.00001-0130-00001.0
Cumberland Farms
RESOLUTION NO. 98- 53
A RESOLUTION OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA,
CANCELLING CERTAIN DELINQUENT TAXES UPON
PUBLICLY OWNED LANDS, PURSUANT TO SECTION 196.28,
FLORIDA STATUTES.
WHEREAS, Section 196.28, Florida Statutes, allows the Board of County Commissioners
of each County to cancel and discharge The right of way is hereby accepted and any and all liens
for taxes, delinquent or current, held or owned by the county or the state, upon lands heretofore or
hereafter conveyed to or acquired by any agency, governmental subdivision, or municipality of the
state, or the United States, for road purposes, defense purposes, recreation, reforestation, or other
public use; and
WHEREAS, such cancellation must be by resolution of the Board of County
Commissioners, duly adopted and entered upon its minutes property describing such lands and
setting forth the public use to which the same are or will be devoted; and
WHEREAS, upon receipt of a certified copy of such resolution, proper officials of the
county and of the state are authorized, empowered, and directed to make proper entries upon the
records to accomplish such cancellation and to do all things necessary to carry out the provisions
of Section 196.28, F.S.;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that:
1. The right of way Is hereby accepted and any and all liens for taxes, delinquent or current,
against the property described in OR Book 1203, Page 2285, which was recently acquired by
Indian River County for future right of way are hereby canceled, pursuant to the authority of
Section 196.28, F.S.
2. The Clerk to the Board of County Commissioners is hereby directed to send a certlf/ed copy
of this resolution to the Tax Collector and the Property Appraiser.
The resolution was moved for adoption by Commissioner Ginn and the motion was
seconded by Commissioner Eggert
follows: and, upon being put to a vote, the vote was as
Chairman John W. Tippin Aye
Vice Chairman Kenneth R. Macht Aye
Commissioner Carolyn K Eggert Aye
Commissioner Caroline D. Ginn Aye
Commissioner Fran B. Adams Aye
The Chairman thereupon declared the resolution duly passed and adopted this 5 day of
May, 1998.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
AttK Barton, Cle (�/�By
By. ' �iuc'�c'" r/c , �. C John W. Tippi'
Chairman
TAX CERTIFICATES OUTSTANDING M
- Dale -
yes n0 QICURRENT PRORATED TAX RECEIVED AND DEPOSITED WITH TAX COLLECTOR
MAY 5, 1998
-13-
•
•
41
.7
v
N
00
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
A parcel lying in Tract 13, Section 23, Township 33 South, Range 39 East,
according to the lost general plot of the land of the Indian River Forms
Company recorded in Plot Book 2 Page 25 of the Public records of
St. Lucie County, Florida.
BEGINNING at a point lying 25 feet East of the West line
of Section 23 (also the West line of Tract 13), and 85 feet
North of the South line of Section 23 (also thhe South line of
Tract 13), and run
Southerly, parallel with said line of Section 23, o distance
of 35 feet. Then run
Easterly, parallel with and 50 feet from the South line of
Section 23, a distance of 35 feet. Then run
Northwesterly a distance of 49.5 feet more or less to the
POINT OF BEGINNING.
Now lying in Indian River County, Florida, and containing 612.5
square feet, more or less.
IRFWCD
8-7 Sublatero/
EXHIBIT "A"
� Iv
I YSll REALTY
? I2 I 01 J
w.i
0r.w
0110
�
X.
Q
O�
P.O.B. CWRERNoUrARMS
BVI OSLO ROAD $
o � SEC770N UN�
CERTIFICATION
1, Charles A. Cromer, hereby certify that I am a registered Professional Surveyor and Mapper licensed to practice in the state
of Florida, that this sketch was mode under my immediate supervision, and that it is accurate and correct. I further certify
that this sketch meets the Minimum Technical standards as described in Chapter 61G17 of the Florida Administrative Code,
pursuant to F.S. Chapter 472. THIS IS NOT A SURVEY
SKETCH TO ACCOMPANY LEGAL DESCRIPTION
PREPARED FOR INDIAN RIVER COUNTY ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
Charles A. Cramer, P.S.M. Reg. X4094 1840 25th St, Vero Beach, FL 32960
Indian River ,County Surveyor (407) 567-8000 Date
- 99US40Z 180
0
r�
I =.�'
C='
�-e
•
ON MOTION by Commissioner Ginn, SECONDED
by Commissioner Eggert, the Board unanimously
adopted Resolution 98-054 cancelling certain
delinquent taxes upon publicly owned lands,
pursuant to Section 196.28, Florida Statutes (Gary
W. Lindsey et ux - 43' Avenue R/W).
Re: RM - 43rd Avenue
Parcel IDs #03.33.39-00000-0010-00001.0
Gary W. Lindsey at ux
RESOLUTION NO. 98- 54
A RESOLUTION OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA,
CANCELLING CERTAIN DELINQUENT TAXES UPON
PUBLICLY OWNED LANDS, PURSUANT TO SECTION 196.28,
FLORIDA STATUTES.
WHEREAS, Section 196.28, Florida Statutes, allows the Board of County Commissioners
of each County to cancel and discharge The right of way is hereby accepted and any and all liens
for taxes, delinquent or current, held or owned by the county or the state, upon lands heretofore or
hereafter conveyed to or acquired by any agency, governmental subdivision, or municipality of the
state, or the United States, for road purposes, defense purposes, recreation, reforestation, or other
public use; and
WHEREAS, such cancellation must be by resolution of the Board of County
Commissioners, duly adopted and entered upon its minutes properly describing such lands and
setting forth the public use to which the same are or will be devoted; and
WHEREAS, upon receipt of a cer'tif'ied copy of such resolution, proper officials of the
county and of the state are authorized, empowered, and directed to make proper entries upon the
records to accomplish such cancellation and to do all things necessary to carry out the provisions
of Section 196.28, F.S.;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that:
1. The right of way Is hereby accepted and any and all liens for taxes, delinquent or current,
against the property described in OR Book 1201, Page 2678, which was recently acquired by
Indian River County for future right of way are hereby canceled, pursuant to the authority of
Section 196.28, F.S.
2. The Clerk to the Board of County Commissioners is hereby directed to send a certlf/ed copy
of this resolution to the Tax Collector and the Property Appraiser.
The resolution was moved for adoption by Commissioner Ginn , and the motion was
seconded by Commissioner Eggert and, upon being put to a vote, the vote was as
follows:
Chairman John W. Tippin
Aye
Vice Chairman Kenneth R. Macht
Aye
Commissioner Carolyn K Eggert
Aye
Commissioner Caroline D. Ginn
Aye
Commissioner Fran B. Adams
Aye
The Chairman thereupon declared the resolution duly passed and adopted this �_ day of
May, 1998.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
Attest: J. K Barton, Clerk
BByPC 1 %W
V
John W. Tippin Chairman
TAX CERTIFICATES OJT TI�MDING
CURRENT PRORATED TtAX RECEIVED AND
DEPOSITED `ATH TAX COLLECTOR
yeS no
$ -0—
;aia.aa n.ra CS AG4!urCO
I Aa%n: n.
-L���
� ❑�(i _1r1
Risk Mgr.
CJe.d
•
MAY 59 1998
-15- 6011
•
0
K3
M
TX
=r—
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
/0
Begin at the Soutwest corner
of Lot 1, Poinsettia Park recorded
in Plot Book 1, Page 14 of the
S 0.00'27" W
Public Records of Indian River
^�
County, Florida, and run
S 89'59'33" E
N 1700'27' E. alongthe
P.O.B.
West line of Lot 1, o distance of
70 feet to a point. Then run
x-
S 89.59'33' E a distance
r — — — —
of 3 feet to a point. Then run
S 0`00'27' W a distance of
I
0 I
54.10 feet to a point. Then run
N t
S 5507'27' E a distance of
/
POINSETTIA
16.93 feet to o point in the
Southerly line of Lot 1. Then run I .3
S 69'46'27g the I C
Southerly line,. too the he POINT OF
BEGINNING.
I
Containng 311.1 square feet.
Lying in Indian River Count,
I
Florida.
I
LOT 2,
Cd I m
I <
I A Section Line
Scale: 1"=20'
43RD AVENUE
N 0'0027" E
/0
57.9'
S 0.00'27" W
54.10'
KS
S 89'59'33" E
55'07 27" E
x-
16.93'
LOT 1
}
/
POINSETTIA
� m
O N1
Plot 899k -T'.Page 14
s
/
6
LOT 2,
CERTIFICATION 1
I, Charles A. Cromer, hereby certify that I am a registered Professional Surveyor and Mapper licensed to practice in the state
of Florida, that this sketch was made under my immediate supervision. and that it is accurate and correct. I further certify h
that this sketch meets the Minimum Technical standards as described 1n Chapter 61G17 of the Florida Administrative Code, •
pursuant to F.S. Chapter 472. '
THIS IS NOT A SURVEY
SKETCH TO ACCOMPANY LEGAL DESCRIPTION
PREPARED FOR INDIAN RIVER COUNTY ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
Charles A. Cromer, P.S.M. Reg. 14094 1840 25th St, Vero Beach, FL 32960 g
Indian River County Surveyor (561) 567-8000 Date •20)%b /!2029 c
z
M
N
0
F -J
G
rt
0
110
00
I
Ut
OP
G
G
2_
?i�
c:
m
Z G. PAYMENTS TO VENDORS OF COURT RELATED COSTS
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of April 23, 1998:
TO: Board of County Commissioners
FROM: Terrence P. O'Brien, Assistant County Attomepo
DATE: April 23, 1998
SUBJECT: Payments to Vendors of Court Related Costs
The Office of the County Attorney has processed and approved payment to the following vendors
for the week of April 20, 1998. Listed below are the vendors names and the amount of each court
related costs.
A. J. Glaser, III, L.P.N.
Clinical Evaluation
80.00
Berthold E. Schwarz, M.D.
Clinical Evaluation
200.00
Garry Edwards, Ph.D.
Clinical Evaluation
275.00
Cindy J. Velasquez
Court Interpreter
50.00
Bradley W. Rossway, Esq.
Legal Services
670.00
James T. Long, Esq.
Legal Services
1,200.00
Celeste L. Hartsfield
Transcriptions
28.00
Medical Record Services, Inc.
Record Research
20.01
Linda Copeland
Transcription
80.50
Sheldon H. Rifkin, Ph.D.
Clinical Evaluation
500.00
Medical Record Services, Inc.
Recons Research
20.78
Shelia I. Flinn
Transcription
73.50
Linda R. Phillips
Transcription
112.00
Ed Taylor, Esq.
Photos
10.52
J R Reporting Associates, Inc.
Transcription
498.00
J R Reporting Associates, Inc.
Transcription
22.00
Linda R. Phillips
Transcription
17.50
Medical Record Services, Inc.
Research Records
26.24
American Reporting
Transcription
44.70
Floyd Evans
Court Interpreter
12.50
Peggy Gollnick
Transcription
178.50
Linda R. Phillips
Transcription
59.50
Celeste Hartsfield
Transcription
28.00
Shelia I. Flinn
Transcription
112.00
Linda Copeland
Transcription
140.00
Linda Copeland
Transcription
84.00
Linda Copeland
Transcription
21.00
Peggy Gollnick
Transcription
31.50
Peggy Goilnick
Transcription '
14.00
Peggy Gollnick
Trasncription
122.50
Total
$4,732.25
TPO/sw
cc: Judge Kanarek
%.C.0 jam{ ikiA - 1�. ';Z GENCA
No action required or taken.
MAY 59 1998
CGL -WY ATTORNEY
-17-
E"Ll"
•
UPJ F�,6c-1- Ij
9.A. PUBLIC HEARING - KENNEDY GROVES. INC. - REQUEST
TO REZONE APPROXIMATELY 39.17 ACRES FROM PD
(PLANNED DEVELOPMENT UP TO 3.54 UNITS/ACRE) TO PD
(PLANNED DEVELOPMENT UP TO 3.60 UNITS/ACRE) AND
TO RECEIVE CONCEPTUAL PD PLAN APPROVAL FOR A
136 LOT SINGLE-FAMILY PLANNED DEVELOPMENT
PRESS -JOURNAL
Published Daily
Vero Beach, Indian River County, Florida
COUNTY OF INDIAN RIVER: STATE OF FLORIDA
Before the undersigned personally appeared Darryl K Hicks who an
oaths tgha he bb president of � PressJoumal, a dally published Beach
In Irldien River County, F lodda; that the attached copy of advertlsemm►t, being
a Nnt1e 0.
In the Cour, was pub•
DOW In said newspaper In the issues of Aa s KKiR
Affiant further says that the said Press ounnal Is a newspaper published at Vero Beach, in
said Indian River has heretofore bow
cwbu u* published Innssaid Ir RiFbicla,iver Ca�unty, Florida. the said hand has bow entered as
second dam mail matter at the post officer in Vero Beach, In said badiarh River County, Florida,
far�bay�f p the fUat pubBcation of the attached car of
torporsays that he has neither paid nor promised any parsers firm
advertisement f« pub tion ln rebate. neti or refund for the propose of seaalrhg tthfs
subscribed before me 1g�9_
�Y9Trrtq rand
a' tiz R�. N
"^v
(�day�f,/.D
I1 A�
��i •
YT E08MC;S1014 EMUS : A..
• 1RNnttYCl,ligl
[0rdti RO.CEb11091 'c a
cy . (SEAL) : •�
KIMBERLY AN ESLAIS
Notary Public, State of Flo
°,:51!t
M m No. CC n Exp941, 2001
a +tA,""•'
Personally Known or Produced ID O
Type of ID Produced
MAY 59 1998
-18-
•
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
Notice of hearing to consider
the adoption of a request to rezone
proper from PD, Planned Develop-
ment (up to 3.54 units/sae; 134
W to PD, Planned Development
(up to 3.60 units/acre; 136 lots) on
a total of 37.84 acres. The subod
properly Is presently owned by
Kennedy Groves Inc., and located
In Section 23, Township 31 and
RonV 39 at the northeast cornerof
CR 510 and Jungle Trail. See the
above map for the location.
A public hearing at which par -
flu in interest and citizen shall
have an opportunity to be heard,
will be held by the Board of
of- Indian
River County, Florida, in the
CauMy Commission Chambers of
the County Administration Building,
located at 1840 25th Street, Vero
Bead, Florida on Tuesday, MoX_5
1998 at 9.05 o.m. The Board of
County—Commissioners may
approve another zoning district,
a1lW than the district requested,
provided If is within the some gen-
oral use category.
Anyone who may wish to
appeal any decision which may be
mode at this meeting will need to
ensure that a verbatim record of
the proceedings is made, which
Includes testimony and evidence
upon which the appeal is based
Please direct planning -related
questions to the current develop-
mmd section at 567-8000, ext.
242.
ANYONE WHO NEEDS A SPE-
CIAL ACCOMMODATION FOR
THIS MEETING MUST CONTACT
THE COUNTY'S AMERICANS
WiTH DISABILITIES ACT (ADA)
COORDINATOR AT 567.8000
X223 AT LEAST 48 HOURS IN
ADVANCE OF THE MEETING.
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS
BY -s -John W. Tfppin
AprB'22,1998 13236741
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of Aprif 27, 1998:
TO: James E. Chandler
County Administrator
D N HEAD CONCURRENCE:
bert eatin , .
Community Development or
THROUGH: Stan Boling, AICP
Planning Director
FROM: John W. McCoy, AICP: 6) M
Senior Planner, Current Development
DATE: April 27, 1998
SUBJECT: Kennedy Groves, Inc.'s Request to Rezone Approximately 39.17 Acres from PD
(Planned Development up to 3.54 unitstacre) to PD (Planned Development up to 3.60
units/acre); and to Receive Conceptual PD Plan Approval for a 136 Lot Single
Family Planned Development
It is requested that the data herein presented be given formal consideration by the Board of County
Commissioners at its regular meeting of May 5, 1998.
*General Request
This is a request by Kennedy Groves Inc., through its agent Knight, McGuire & Associates, Inc., to
rezone approximately 39.17 acres from PD (Planned Development up to 3.54 units/acre) to PD
(Planned Development up to 3.60 units/acre). As part of the PD rezoning request, a PD conceptual
plan/plat has been submitted for approval. The subject site is located at the northeast comer of CR
510 and Jungle Trail, and consists of an existing citrus grove. The purpose of this request is to
secure the zoning which would permit the construction of single family homes on lots of various
sizes, many of which are proposed to be smaller than normally sized RS -6 lots (7,000 square feet).
The subject site was rezoned to Planned Development approximately two years ago. As with all PD
rezoning requests, that rezoning included a conceptual PD plan. A rezoning is required at this time
because the applicant wants to increase the density and modify the conceptual plan design at the
project perimeters. Those changes are reflected in a modified conceptual PD plan that is part of the
PD rezoning application.
At its regular meeting of April 9, 1998, the Planning and Zoning Commission voted unanimously
(6-0) to recommend that the Board of County Commissioners approve the rezoning request and
conceptual plan modifications, subject to the conditions contained in the recommendation at the end
of this report. If the rezoning and conceptual plan modifications are approved by the Board, then
a preliminary PD plat/plan for Phase I will be considered by the Planning and Zoning Commission
at a later date.
eDevelopment Approval Options Available to the Developer
Presently, the site is zoned Planned Development (PD), which allows residential development, but
must be rezoned in order to increase the density and approve the design changes to the conceptual
plan. Any rezoning action must comply with the site's L-2, Low Density Residential 2 (up to 6
units/acre) land use designation. There are two options available to the developer to seek approval
of the proposed project. Either of the two options, if approved, would allow the applicant to proceed
with his project, as proposed.
MAY 59 1998
-19- EO; K
r?iJC°�JLV
These options are as follows:
1. Rezone the site to a standard residential zoning district which allows a density of no more
than 6 units/acre, and propose development under a normal subdivision application or a PD
(planned development) application for special exception use approval.
2. Rezone the site to a PD zoning district that is tied to a conceptual PD plan proposing a
density not exceeding 6 units/acre.
The developer has opted for a PD rezoning. If approved, the PD rezoning would effectively rezone
the property and approve the conceptual plan in one set of public hearings.
*The PD Zoning District, Generally
Although many PD projects have been reviewed in the county, few of those projects have involved
PD rawnings. Unlike standard zoning districts, there are no specific size or dimension criteria for
PD districts. Instead, the PD district is based on the underlying land use plan designation for density
and use limitations, and on compatibility requirements. In the PD zoning district, setbacks and other
typical zoning district regulations are established on a site by site basis through approval of a
conceptual PD plan. Adopted as part of the PD zoning for a property, the conceptual plan serves as
the zoning standard for the site.
A rezoning to the PD district requires the submission of a binding conceptual PD plan which, along
with certain PD district requirements, limits uses and sets -forth specific development standards on
the site. Thus, a PD rezoning allows a unique PD district to be developed specifically for each
development site.
In this case, the conceptual PD plan proposes the phased development of a 136 lot single family
subdivision with associated recreational amenities and certain buffers. The PD plan indicates that
the single family homes would be detached units. Aspects of the conceptual PD are addressed in the
"Plan Analysis" section of this report.
In planning staffs opinion, the PD rezoning option is the best alternative for approving residential
development on the subject site. Unlike other zoning districts, the PD zoning district allows the
county to consider the appropriateness of the proposed development design as part of a rezoning
request.
oThe PD Rezoning Process
The PD rezoning review, approval, and development process is as follows:
STEP 1. Rezoning and conceptual PD plan approval: Review and recommendation made by
staff and by the planning and Zoning Commission. Final action taken by the Board
of County Commissioners.
STEP 2. Preliminary PD plan (combination of site plan and preliminary plat) approval:
Review and recommendation made by staff. Final action taken by the Planning and
Zoning Commission, subject to the Board's action on the rezoning request.
STEP 3. Land Development Permit or Permit Waiver. Reviewed and issued by staff for
construction of subdivision improvements (roads, utilities, drainage).
STEP 4. Building Permit(s): Reviewed and issued by staff for construction of buildings
STEP 5. Final PD Plat approval: Review and recommendation made by staff. Final action
taken by the Board of County Commissioners.
STEP 6. Certificate of occupancy: Reviewed and issued by staff for use and occupancy of
buildings.
The applicant is pursuing approval of Step 1.
Once a PD conceptual plan is approved, only minor modifications to the conceptual plan can be
approved at a staff level. Any proposed changes that would intensify the site use (e.g. increase the
maximum number of lots) or reduce compatibility elements (e.g. reduced buffering) may be
approved -only via a process involving public hearings held by both the Planning and Zoning
Commission and the Board of County Commissioners.
*Proposed PD District for the Project Site
The subject site has an L-2 land use designation. This underlying land use designation allows a
variety of single and multi -family zoning districts having a maximum density of 6 units/acre. Since
MAY 59 1998
the land use designation controls the use of the property by limiting the zoning districts applicable
to the property, any rezoning must be compatible with the uses and densities allowed by the
property's land use designation. Once a specific PD rezoning is approved for a site, the applicable
PD conceptual plan adopted as part of the rezoning limits the type of specific uses, densities, and
dimensional criteria allowed on the subject site.
Although PD zoning district parameters are flexible, certain standards related to uses, compatibility
(buffering), infrastructure improvements, dimensional criteria, and open space areas are set forth in
chapter 915 (P.D. Process and Standards for Development Ordinance) of the county's land
development regulations (LDRs). Based upon the proposed conceptual PD plan and the chapter 915
standards, the proposed PD district for the subject site contains the following elements as compared
with the site's existing PD zoning district parameters and RS -6 zoning district standards.
ELEMENT
PROPOSED PD DISTRICT
EXISTING PD
RS -6 DISTRICT
DISTRICT
Uses
Same as RS -6, with guest cottage
Same as proposed
Single family detached,
allowed as permitted, by
accessory dwelling
971.41(4)
units, places of
worship, etc. as listed
in section 911.07.
Ditty
3.60 unitsJacre (net)
3.52 units/acre(net)
up to 6 units/acre
Maximum bldg.
55%
45%
300A
coverage
Maximum impervious
80%
70%
60%
per lot
Minimum open space:
Per lot
200/6'
300/6'
40%
Overall site
40%
40°/u
40%
Maximum bldg. height
35'
35'
35'
Minimum lot size
Internal lots 5,700 sq. R;
5,570 sq. R
7,000 sq. R
East perimeter 7,920 sq. R;
West perimeter 7,000 sq. R
Building setbacks:
Front:
20' along east perimeter
20' front entry garage
20'
10' (all other lots)
Side:
10' along east perimeter
10' side entry
10'
8' (all other lots)'
0/10 mm. 10' separation
Rear.
25-30' on all perimeters=,
25-30' on all perimeters
20'
10' intimal lots
10t2
Pools:
Front:
20' (east perimeter)
10'
20'
5' (all other lots)
Side:
10' (east perimeter)
10'/0' min.; 10'
10'
2' (all other lots)
separation between
units
Rear
)east,
10'2
10'
10( (north, south Perimeters)
25'-30' (Jungle
2p5-33�0' (J gle Trail/west
Trail/west perimeter)2
Decks & Patios:
From
20' (east perimeter)
5'
20'
5' (all other lots)
Side:
10' (east perimeter)
5'
10'
T (all other lots)
Rear
�
512
10,
lU4 (nm south Perimeters)
25-30' (Jungle
25'-30' (Jungle Trail/west
Trail/wen perimeterf
Perimeter12
MAY 5, 1998
4,
co�K 10;.s r,'21
FA6E
'The side yard setback will range from 0' to 8', with all buildings being separated by a minimum of 8', except along east
perimeter where RS 4 setbacks apply
2No building, pool, patio or deck can be located within the 30' Jungle Trail Buffer or within 25' of the west perimeter,
whichever distance is greater.
'Open space will be guaranteed through the setbacks on each individual lot and the overall controls on the conceptual PD plan.
General Note: Roof overhangs can encroach in privately dedicated easemems, no other structures shall be allowed to encroach
in easements of any type.
Genual Note: For lots with more than one front yard; a 6 fence can be placed in one of the front yards to provide privacy for
rear yard amenities.
General Note: Roof overhangs are allowed to encroach 3' onto the adjacent property.
General Note: The developer is requesting a 40' wide private right of way for the local road within the development. In
addition to the 40' wide right of way, there will be an 8' utility easement on both sides of the right of way to form a 56' wide
roadway and utility corridor.
It should be noted that, if the PD rezoning is approved, the approved conceptual plan will be
included as an actual exhibit to the ordinance that approves the rezoning request. Additional items
which are controlled by the conceptual plan include buffering and the overall subdivision layout.
REZONING ANALYSIS•
*Existing Zoning and Land Use Pattern
The subject site is presently an active citrus grove and is located on a principal arterial (CR 510) at
the northeast comer of the intersection with CR 510 and Jungle Trail.
To the north and west of the subject site are primarily residential areas within the Town of Orchid.
However, at the northwest comer of Jungle Trail and CR 510, immediately west of the southern
portion of the site, there is vacant commercially zoned property within the Town. Jungle Trail
physically separates the proposed project from the Town of Orchid, and provides an effective
physical barrier between the two developments. There is an area labeled as conservation area within
the Town of Orchid which separates the north portion of the proposed development from Jungle
Trail. Staff and the developer have been coordinating with the Town manager, who indicates that
the Town has no objections to the proposed project.
South of the subject site, across CR 510, is a grove zoned RM -6 with an L-2 land use designation.
East of the site is an existing residential area zoned RT -6 and RS -6 (please see attachment #2).
This area includes the Oceanaire Heights and Spring Place neighborhoods, both of which consist
primarily of single family homes. There are several duplexes in Oceanaire Heights. Since Oceanaire
Heights is zoned RT -6, duplexes are allowed in that subdivision.
It is the property to the east which will be most affected by the proposed rezoning, since that
property is the most heavily developed and is not physically separated from the subject property.
Generally, the proposed single family PD rezoning is consistent with the existing pattern of
development to the east In addition, a 10' wide Type "C" buffer is required along the east property
line, and all lots along the east property line are proposed to conform to the RS -6 minimum lot size,
dimensional, and setback criteria These factors should ensure that the proposed development is
compatible with the adjacent subdivisions.
*Future Land Use Map Pattern
The subject property has an L-2 land use designation, as does the property to the east and south. The
property to the north and west, within the Town of Orchid, has a residential land use designation
allowing up to 2 unitstacre, except for the commercially designated parcel at the northwest corner
of CR 510/Jungle Trail. The proposed PD rezoning of the subject property is consistent with the
county's Future Land Use Map.
Rezoning requests are reviewed for consistency with the policies of the comprehensive plan and
must also be consistent with the overall designation of land uses as depicted on the Future Land Use
Map. These include agricultural, residential, recreational, conservation, and commercial and
industrial land uses and their densities. Commercial and industrial land uses are located in nodes
throughout the unincorporated areas of bidian River County.
MAY 59 1998
The goals, objectives and policies are the most important parts of the comprehensive plan. Policies
are statements in the plan which identify the actions which the county will take in order to direct the
community's development. As courses of action committed to by the county, policies provide the
basis for all county land development related decisions. While all comprehensive plan policies are
important, some have more applicability than others in reviewing rezoning requests. Of particular
applicability for this request are the following policies and objectives.
Future Land Use Element Objective 5 and Policy 5.3
Future Land Use Element Objective 5 and Policy 5.3 encourage varied densities and development
patters to accommodate a diversity of lifestyles. Most of the residentially designated land near the
subject property is platted for single family or two-family development. By permitting a different
form of single family on the subject property, the subject request implements Future Land Use
Element Objective 5 and Policy 5.3.
Future Land Use Element Policies 1.11 and 1.12
Future Land Use Element Policy 1.12 states that the L-2, Low Density Residential -2, land use
designation is intended for residential uses with densities up to 6 units/acre. In addition, Future Land
Use Element Policy 1.11 states that these residential uses must be located within an existing or future
urban service area.
Since the subject property is located within an area designated as L-2 on the county's future land use
plan map, is located within the county's urban service area, and would permit residential uses less
than the 6 units/acre allowed by the L-2 designation, the proposed request is consistent with Policies
1.11 and 1.12.
While the referenced policies and objectives are particularly applicable to this request, other
comprehensive plan policies and objectives also have relevance. For that reason, staff evaluated the
subject request for consistency with all plan policies and objectives. Based upon that analysis, staff
determined that the request is consistent with the comprehensive plan.
Staffs position is that granting the request to rezone the subject property to PD will result in
development which will be compatible with surrounding areas. Since land to the east is currently
zoned RT -6 and RS -6, the request is consistent with an expansion of that existing zoning patter
As indicated on the conceptual plan, the clubhouse and recreational facilities will be located close
to CR 510 or the interior of the project, thereby ensuring compatibility with existing residential uses
in the arra
Based on population projections and current development patterns, residential development in this
area of the county is expected to increase and eventually become the dominant land use. The
proposed rezoning would be consistent with the comprehensive plan, since the area is located within
the Urban Service Area and is designated for low-density residential development.
As indicated previously in the rezoning analysis, the property to the east will be the most affected
by this rezoning request. However, the proposed rezoning to PD for a single family residential
development would be more compatible with the existing development to the east than is the present
active agricultural use on the subject property.
For these reasons, staff feels that the requested PD zoning would be compatible with the surrounding
•Environmental Impacts and Concurrency
These issues will be analyzed in the PD plan analysis.
PD PLAN ANALYSIS:
The conceptual PD plan indicates that 136 lots will be developed in two phases. The project will
also include a recreational tract, 3 lakes, and other amenities.
1. Size of Site: 39.17 acres (gross)
37.84 acres (less right-of-way dedications)
2. Zoning Classification:
Current: PD, Planned Development (up to 3.54 unitslacre)
Proposed: PD, Planned Development (up to 3.60 units/acre)
MAY 59 1998
-23- b 0 FA 6 Ao —U.
3.
4.
5.
A
7.
7
C� } LJ rAi c
Land Use Designation: L-2, Low Density 2 (up to 6 units/acre)
Density:
Proposed Zoning PD Plan: 136 lots divided by 37.84 acres = 3.60 units/acre
Please note that the densities are calculations based on the net parcel size. With the
property's L-2 land use designation, the 37.84 acre site could have a maximum of 227 units.
Lot Size:
RS -6 Minimum: 7,000 sq. ft.
Minimum Proposed. 5,700 sq. ft. for internal lots; 7,000 sq. ft. for west
perimeter lots (Jungle Trail); 7,290 sq. & for east perimeter
lots (Oceanaire Heights/Spring Place)
Open Space: Required. 40.0% of the site or 15.14 acres
Provided: 42.2% of the site or 15.97 acres
Below is a summary of the open space provided.
Lake Area.
Common Green Area:
Recreation Tract:
Private Green Space:
Private Impervious Area:
Total:
4.54' acres
3.72 acres
1.34 acres
4.362 acres
1.51' acres equal to 10% of requirement
.50 acres'
15.97 acres
Note': Lake area can account for only 30% of the open space requirement, and private
impervious area can account for only 10% of the open space requirement.
Note2: Private green open space is based on 20% green open space per lot, which is
guaranteed by the proposed setbacks.
Note': Under the PD ordinance, sidewalks count as open space; however, other areas within
rights-of-way are not counted as open space.
General note: Open space does not include green area within private rights-of-way, and is
calculated on net project size.
General Notes: In contrast to the previously approved plan, this plan provides substantially
more lake area and common green area than the previous plan. The previous plan provided
2.74 acres of lake area and 2.87 acres of common green area
Recreation Area: Required: 1.61 acres
Provided: 3.24 acres
The recreation area is provided via a clubhouse recreation complex and pedestrian walkways.
S. Phasing: The applicant is proposing to construct the proposed development in two phases.
The first phase comprises the southern portion of the site and will consist of 39 lots, a portion
of the stormwater management tract, and most of the recreational amenities. The remaining
97 lots, stormwater management system, and minor recreational amenities will be
constructed in Phase H.
9. Environmental Issues:
•Uplands: Since the site is over 5 acres, the native upland set-aside requirement of LDR
section 929.05 applies to any native upland vegetation areas. However, the existing site
consists entirely of groves; therefore, no upland set-aside is required.
• Wetlands: Environmental planning staff has concluded that there are no wetlands on the
site. Therefore, wetland permitting is not an. issue.
•Excavation: Approximately 4.54 acres of lake are proposed within the project. The
applicant has indicated that the fill obtained will be used on-site. Therefore, there is no
incidental to construction off-site hauling/sand mining issue. The applicant is required to
construct littoral zones within the proposed lake, and such zones have been depicted on the
plan. The littoral zone planting plan will need to be approved prior to the issuance of a land
development permit.
MAY 59 1998
01 0
10. Concurrency Management: Long-range planning staff has indicated that a conditional
concurrency certificate will be issued for this project prior to the Planning and Zoning
Commission's consideration of this item. Thus, all concurrency requirements related to
preliminary PD approval have been satisfied.
11. Stormwater Management: As with standard single family subdivisions, the stormwater
management plan has been conceptually approved by the public works department, provided
that the applicant can document a legal positive outfall. Final review and approval of the
stormwater management plan shall be accomplished through the land development permit
process.
12. Thoroughfare Plan: The project has 647' of frontage on CR 510 (93rd Street) which is
designated on the Thoroughfare Plan as an urban principal arterial requiring 160' of right-of-
way. Presently the existing right-of-way width varies between 120' and 140'. The applicant's
design accommodates the additional 20' and 40' segments that will be acquired by the county.
The county will acquire the full right-of-way for CR 510 as part of this project and
compensate the applicant through traffic impact fees and other means.
13. Traffic Circulation: The project will be accessed from CR 510 by the subdivision's main
roadway which will provide access to the other streets within the subdivision. The
connection to CR 510 will be the only access point for this subdivision. Staff reviewed the
alternative of interconnecting the proposed PD with one or more streets in Oceanaire
Heights, and decided not to recommend the interconnection. This decision was based upon
the limitations of the existing street pattern to the east of the subject property and potential
negative impacts on Oceanaire Heights. Since Coco Plum is the only through street to SR
A -1-A, Coco Plum would bear the majority of any traffic as a result of an interconnection
with the PD. In staffs opinion, the traffic funneling effect on Coco Plum would adversely
affect the existing homes on that street.
As a result of the Traffic Impact Analysis, which was reviewed and approved by the County
Traffic Engineering Division, a left -turn lane on CR 510 is required at the project entrance.
The left -turn will need to be constructed prior to the issuance of a certificate of completion
for phase II. Also, the developer will provide a west bound right -tum lane on CR 510, an
improvement which is not a requirement of the Traffic Impact Analysis.
The applicant will provide an emergency access interconnection at Magnolia Lane, for which
the construction details will need to be approved by the Emergency Management Department
Prior to the issuance of a land development permit. There will also be a pedestrian
interconnection between the proposed development and Oceanaire Heights at the emergency
access point. Such an interconnection should benefit residents of the PD and Oceanaire
Heights residents.
14. Utilities: County potable water and wastewater services are available to the site, and
connection is mandatory. The project will connect to county water and wastewater services.
County Utilities has approved the connection to water and wastewater.
IS. Dedications and Improvements: The developer is required to construct an 8' wide bike
path along the project's CR 510 frontage. The bike path will need to be built or bonded prior
to the issuance of a certificate of completion for phase I.
As earlier referenced, the developer will also be required to construct a left -tum lane on CR
510 at the project entrance.
16. Proposed PD Waivers: The proposed waivers available through the PD process were
discussed in the PD zoning analysis. Please reference that section for waivers proposed by
the development.
17. Pedestrian Circulation: The subdivision will have a 4' sidewalk along the interior of the
main loop road The sidewalk will connect to the bike path along CR 510. Two other
external pedestrian connections will be made, one to Jungle Trail and one to Magnolia Lane.
18. Jungle Trail: The project borders Jungle Trail along its western perimeter for
approximately 2,600'. The conceptual and preliminary PD plans provide for a 30' Jungle
Trail buffer as required in the Jungle Trail Management Plan. The applicant will be
constructing the Jungle Trail buffer previously approved by the Planning and Zoning
Commission consisting of a double row of existing citrus trees used as canopy trees, with
smaller trees like wax -myrtles used for understory trees. Please see attachment #4 for the
typical section.
The developer may also construct a fence within the Jungle Trail buffer. The fence would
be permitted, provided that it meets certain criteria. Generally, the following criteria would
need to be met for fence construction:
MAY 59 1998
-25- �'�J �K UJ- �YIV[ �et1�Kd�
_I
• the fence must be less than 50% opaque when viewed at a right angle to the fence;
and
• the fence must be located in the outer 10' of the buffer, i.e. more than 20' from the
travel way; and
• no native vegetation in the buffer can be removed to construct the fence.
Previously, the developer had proposed a temporary construction access point to Jungle Trail
near CR 510 for access to a construction and sales office. While the Jungle Trail
Management Plan does not address the use of the Trail as access for development purposes,
it has been the past practice of staff to discourage the use of the Trail for access. In fact,
during its consideration of the original PD rezoning request, the Board agreed with staff and
denied use of Jungle Trail for construction access. It is staffs opinion that vehicular access
should be denied to Jungle Trail, and all vehicular access should be required to come from
CR 510 through the project The applicant now proposes a construction entrance off C.R.
510 at the east end of the site.
19. Use of Tracts:
Tracts B & C - Drainage facilities and common area for recreation, open space and
landscaping.
Tracts D & E- Multi-purpose recreation facility, 3,000 square foot Property Owners
Association building, tennis courts. These improvements require Indian River County site
plan approval.
Tracts F, H, & I - Common area for recreation, open space and landscaping.
Tract G - Common recreation area, open space, landscape, and double frontage buffer.
Tracts J & K- Landscape, pedestrian access, and emergency access.
Note: Tract A is reserved for future development Any such development must be consistent
with the uses in the RS -6 zoning district, or the tract must be rezoned.
20. Landscaping and Buffering: The planned development compatibility standards require a
25' perimeter building (residence) setback within all planned developments. Landscape
buffers can be required within these setbacks, depending upon the proposed type of
development within the PD and adjacent development or zoning. For this project, buffers
are required as follows:
North: Along the north property line, the proposed project is adjacent to the Town of
Orchid. The property within the Town of Orchid adjacent to the project has been dedicated
as a conservation tract, with Jungle Trail just to the north of the conservation easement. The
conservation area is the Jungle Trail buffer area. The applicant is proposing a Type "C"
landscape buffer for this area, and that is consistent with LDR section 915.16.
West: The west project perimeter is adjacent to Jungle Trail. As earlier described, the
applicant will be using citrus to provide a buffer consistent with the plan previously approved
by the Planning and Zoning Commission.
South: Lying across CR 510 to the south of the property is a grove which has a residential
land use designation. There is no buffer required along the south property line adjacent to
CR 510, since the applicant is providing a 150' transitional area.
East: To the east of the project site is Oceanaire Heights and Spring Place, subdivisions
which are residentially designated and residentially developed The developer is proposing
to provide a Type "C" buffer along the east boundary of the project site; this is consistent
with the requirements of LDR section 915.16. Principal structures will be setback 25' from
the east property line and pools and decks will be setback 10'. These provisions are
consistent with LDR sections 915.16(1)(A) and 915.16(1)(B).
The requested PD rezoning and corresponding conceptual PD plan are compatible with the
surrounding area, consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, meet all concurrency requirements, and
are consistent with the site's L-2, Low Density 2 (up to 6 unitstacre), land use designation. The
subject property is suitable for residential development given the surrounding land use and zoning
designations as well as its proximity and direct access to CR 510.
MAY 59 1998
40 0
RECOMME ATM,
Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners grant approval of the PD rezoning
request and the PD conceptual plan, with the following conditions:
1. That prior to the issuance of a land development permit (LDP), the applicant shall submit
detailed Jungle Trail buffer area landscape plans that comply with the conceptual plan.
2. That prior to the issuance of an LDP, the Planning Division and Department of Emergency
Services approve a detail of the emergency access point at Magnolia Lane.
3. That prior to the issuance of a certificate of completion for Phase I, an 8' bike path shall be
built or bonded for along the project's CR 510 frontage.
4. That prior to the issuance of a certificate of completion for Phase II, the left tum lane on CR
510 shall be completed.
OF
Subject Site,
L
I
w
!GOV. LOT 4
MAY 59 1998
\ WA13ASSOR CORRIDOR PLAN AREA
�1 (SPECIAL- REQUIREMENT0
`X.
-A
.t
7�v\
SUMMERPLACE
SUBDIVISION
-27- U :2 F,1 c J
Planning Director Stan Boling reviewed the revised project, noting that the rezoning
request is to accommodate 2 additional lots as a part of the conceptual PD plan. He also
noted that the Clerk had been supplied with a proposed ordinance which was not a part of
the original backup but which needs to be adopted.
Commissioner Ginn questioned who will maintain the citrus trees being used as a
portion of the Jungle Trail buffer, and Director Boling responded that would be the
obligation of the property owners' association.
The Chairman opened the public hearing and asked if anyone wished to be heard
regarding this matter. There being none, the Chairman closed the public hearing.
MAY 59 1998
ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert,
SECONDED by Commissioner Adams, the Board
unanimously approved the PD rezoning request and
the PD conceptual plan with the following
conditions: (1) that prior to the issuance of a land
development permit (LDP), the applicant shall
submit detailed Jungle Trail buffer area landscape
plans that comply with the conceptual plan; (2) that
prior to the issuance of an LDP, the Planning
Division and Department of Emergency Services
approve a detail of the emergency access point at
Magnolia Lane; (3) that prior to the issuance of a
certificate of completion for Phase L an 8' bike path
shall be built or bonded for along the project's CR -
5 10
R510 frontage; and (4) that prior to the issuance of a
certificate of completion for Phase II, the left -turn
lane on CR -510 shall be completed; as
recommended by staff, and adopted Ordinance 98-
007 amending the Zoning Ordinance and the
accompanying Zoning Map from PD to PD for
approximately 39.17 acres of land generally located
at the northeast corner of CR -510 and Jungle Trail;
and described herein, and providing for an effective
date.
-28-
Y.+L►�e f
•
ORDINANCE NO. 98-07
AN ORDINANCE OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AMENDING
THE ZONING ORDINANCE AND THE ACCOMPANYING ZONING MAP FROM
PD TO PD FOR APPROXIMATELY 39.17 ACRES OF LAND GENERALLY
LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF CR 510 AND JUNGLE
TRAIL; AND DESCRIBED HEREIN, AND PROVIDING FOR AN
EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission, sitting as the
local planning agency on such matters, has held a public hearing
and subsequently made a recommendation regarding this rezoning
request; and
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River
County, Florida, did publish and send its Notice of Intent to
rezone the hereinafter described property; and
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners has determined that
this rezoning, is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan of Indian
River County, and the county land development regulations,
including but not limited to the Planned Development (PD) Process
and Standards for Development chapter; and
WHEREAS, The Board of County Commissioners of Indian River
County, in conjunction with the rezoning request has approved a PD
conceptual plan (see EXHIBIT B, attached) that controls and
regulates development on the subject land; and
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners has held a public
hearing pursuant to this rezoning request, at which parties in
interest and citizens were heard;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED, by the Board of County
Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida, that the Zoning of
the property situated in Indian River County, and legally described
in EXHIBIT A (attached) be changed from PD to PD (up to 4
units/acre).
All with the meaning and intent as set forth in the land
development regulations, and the approved conceptual plan as may be
amended pursuant to the provisions of the Planned Development (PD)
Process and Standards for Development chapter of the land
development regulations.
MAY 511998
-29- EOJKU-
•
Ordinance 98-07
Approved and adopted by the Board of County Commissioners of
Indian River County, Florida, on this 5 day of May , 1998.
This ordinance was advertised in the Vero Beach Press -Journal
on the 22 day of April 1998 for a public hearing to be held
on the 5 day of May 1998 at which time it was moved for
adoption by Commissioner Eggert , seconded by Commissioner
Adams , and adopted by the following vote:
Chairman John W. Tippin Aye
Vice Chairman Kenneth R. Macht Aye
Commissioner Fran B. Adams Aye
Commissioner Carolyn K. Eggert Aye
Commissioner Caroline Ginn Aye
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
John W. Tippi ,Chairman
ATTEST BY:
Je�f K. Bad 11
Clerk
vZte,� i. i�1 • \
ci
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this
8 by John W. Tippin as Chairman of the Board of County
Comfiahsioners of Indian River County, Florida, and by
Al Deputy Clerk for Jeffrey K. Barton, Clerk of
the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida,
who are personally known to me.
Notary Public
� ✓�r�i AlieeE.lY6ite +; /..
<� a' NOMYPubli0.StaeofFbtida , ' �_t -lop
<�� CaaaoipiaeNao7N62 Printed Name:
< �0i`V my�0'6�0°� t Commission No.:
c 1400-''-rft4L CommissionExpiration:
Acknowledgement by the Department of State of the State of Florida
this day of 1998.
Effective upon filing with the Department of State.
This ordinance was filed with the Department of State on the
following date:
u\c\j\kennedy2.0rd
Riva Ca I Apar ea
get
G
Mgr.
MAY 5.) 1998
Date
Ordinance 98-07
ffiIBIT "A"
WEST 1/2 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4, AND
THE WEST 1/2 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4,
IN SECTION 23, TOWNSHIP 31 SOUTH, RANGE 39 EAST, INDIAN
RIVER COUNTY, STATE OF FLORIDA, LESS ALL ROAD, DITCH AND
CANAL RIGHTS OF WAY OF RECORD, LESS AND EXCEPT THE
FOLLOWING DESCRIBED PROPERTY CONVEYED TO BRUCE JACOBS AND
ELLEN JACOBS, HIS WIFE, IN OFFICIAL RECORDS, BOOK 0763,
PAGE 1467, PUBLIC RECORDS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, STATE
OF FLORIDA: BEGINNING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 9,
BLOCK C OCEANAIRE HEIGHTS SUBDIVISION UNIT #1, AS
RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 3, PAGE 84, PUBLIC RECORDS OF
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, STATE OF FLORIDA, RUN WEST ALONG THE
PROLONGATION OF THE NORTH LINE OF SAID LOT 9 A DISTANCE
OF 4.0 FEET; THENCE RUN SOUTH PARALLEL TO THE WEST LINE
OF SAID LOT 9 FOR A DISTANCE OF 93.5 FEET; THENCE RUN
EAST A DISTANCE OF 4.0 FEET TO A POINT WHICH LIES 23.5
FEET SOUTH OF THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT 9; THENCE
RUN NORTH ALONG THE WEST PROPERTY LINE OF PART OF LOT 8
AND LOT 9 FOR A DISTANCE OF 93.5 FEET TO THE POINT OF
BEGINNING.
ALSO LESS:
"LYING WITHIN THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED BOUNDARIES TO WIT:
COMMENCING AT THE SOUTH QUARTER CORNER OF SECTION 23,
TOWNSHIP 31 SOUTH, RANGE 39 EAST, INDIAN RIVER COUNTY,
FLORIDA; THENCE SOUTH 89059146" WEST (BEARINGS USED
HEREIN ARE REFERENCED TO THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SECTION
23 AS SHOWN ON RIGHT OF WAY MAPS OF FORMER STATE ROAD
(S.R.) 510, SECTION 88050-2505 FOR THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT
OF TRANSPORTATION AS RECORDED IN DOCKET NO. 200539 PLAT
BOOK 9, PAGE 84 OF THE SAID PUBLIC RECORDS) ALONG THE
BASELINE OF SURVEY AND CENTERLINE OF CONSTRUCTION (FOR
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS TO COUNTY
ROAD (C.R.) 510 AND STATE ROAD A -1-A, PROJECT NO. 8842)
SAME LINE BEING THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 23, A
DISTANCE OF 1003.45 FEET; THENCE NORTH 00000114" EAST (AT
RIGHT ANGLES TO THE PRECEDING LINE), A DISTANCE OF 40.00
FEET TO A POINT OF THE EXISTING NORTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY
LINE FOR SAID C.R. 510 ( SAID FORMER S.R. 510 ) AND THE
POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH 00000114" EAST, A
DISTANCE OF 20.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89059146" EAST ALONG
A LINE LOCATED 60.00 FEET NORTH OF (AS MEASURED AT RIGHT
ANGLES) AND PARALLEL WITH THE SAID SOUTH LINE OF SECTION
23, A DISTANCE OF 344.73 FEET TO A POINT ON THE WESTERLY
LINE OF THE PLAT OF "OCEANAIRE HEIGHT" UNIT NO. 1, AS
RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 3, PAGE 84 OF THE SAID PUBLIC
RECORDS; THENCE SOUTH 00006114" WEST ALONG SAID WESTERLY
LINE OF "OCEANAIRE HEIGHTS", A DISTANCE OF 20.00 FEET TO
A POINT ON SAID NORTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF COUNTY
ROAD 510; THENCE SOUTH 89059146" WEST ALONG SAID
NORTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF COUNTY ROAD 510 LOCATED
40.00 FEET NORTH OF (AS MEASURED AT RIGHT ANGLES) AND
PARALLEL WITH THE SAID SOUTH LINE OF SECTION 23, A
DISTANCE OF 344.70 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING
CONTAINING IN AREA 6,394 SQUARE FEET, MORE OR LESS."
(O.R. 0919, PG. 2872, INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA)
COPY OF PD CONCEPTUAL PLAN IS ON FILE WITH
THE ORIGINAL ORDINANCE 98-07
MAY 511998
9.A. PUBLIC HEARING - BEACH PRESERVATION PLAN
UPDATE - TO BE DISCUSSED UNDER AGENDA ITEM NO. 15
9.C. PUBLIC NOTICE ITEM - ADOPTION OF LATEST EDITION
OF NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODE MQ - PUBLIC
HEARING FOR MAY 12. 1998
The Chairman announced that on May 12, 1998 a public hearing will be held
regarding the adoption of the latest edition of the National Electrical Code (NEC).
11A SANDAB COMMUNICATIONS LIMITED
PARTNERSHIP II - COUNTY CONSENT TO
ASSIGNMENT OF LICENSE TO PINNACLE TOWERS,
INC. UTILIZING A CONSENT AND ESTOPPEL
AGREEMENT
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of April 23, 1998:
TO: Honorable Board of County Commissioners
THROUGH: Jim Chandler, County Administrator
FROM: Doug Wright, Director td�
Emergency Services
DATE: April 23, 1998
SUBJECT: Consent to Assignment Of License From San& Communications Limited
Partnership H, To Pinnacle Towers, Inc., Utilizing A Consent And Estoppel
Agreement
On March 17, 1992, the Board of County Commissioners entered into a License Agreement with
Sandab Communications Limited Partnership, U. The License Agreement relates to land owned
by the County near the solid waste transfer station at Old Dixie Highway and First Street where
two communications towers were constructed and used primarily by WGYL. Sandab
Communications is proposing to enter into an Asset Purchase Agreement with Pinnacle Towers
wherein Pinnacle would purchase Sandab's interest and assets in the towers.
Section 4 of the License Agreement provides that the Licensee may not assign the License
without the prior written approval of the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River
County and that the County will not unreasonably withhold such approval.
There was one amendment to the License Agreement on June 22, 1993. The purpose of the
amendment was to extend the term of the Agreement. The County does not lose or waive any
of its rights and authority as stated in the original License Agreement, including retaining two
free spaces on the tower and space inside the equipment building for the location of
communications equipment for use in the event the space is needed by the County.
Staff and the County Attorney have reviewed the documents and submits to the Board there is
no reason to withhold approval of the Assignment of License.
MAY 59 1998
i
1-1
RECONDUNDATION:
Staff recommends approval of the Assignment Of License from Sandab Communications Limited
Partnership II to Pinnacle Towers, Inc., utilizing a Consent and Estoppel Agreement.
ATTACHMENTS:
Two original copies of a Consent And Estoppel Agreement which includes as attachments a copy
of the License Agreement dated March 17, 1992, and a copy of the Amendment To License
Agreement dated June 22, 1993.
MOTION WAS MADE by Commissioner Eggert,
SECONDED by Commissioner Ginn, that the Board
approve the Consent and Estoppel Agreement with
Pinnacle Towers, Inc. regarding the License
Agreement with Sandab Communications Limited
Partnership, II of March 17, 1992, as recommended
by staff.
Under discussion, Commissioner Adams questioned the 30 year term of the
Agreement.
County Administrator Chandler noted that in terms of usage, staff felt that would not
be a problem.
Radiological Emergency Analyst Nathan McCollum advised that all the other tower
leases are similarly written.
MAY 59 1998
THE CHAHUVIAN CALLED THE QUESTION and
the Motion passed unanimously.
AGREEMENT ON FILE IN THE OFFICE
OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
-33- l OJT frti:UL °C�.L
11.G.1. AMERON HOMES, INC. -LOT 12, BLOCK 10, VERO
LAKE ESTATES, UNIT NO. 1- REQUEST FOR
FLOODPLAIN CUT AND FILL BALANCE WAIVER
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of April 24, 1998:
TO: James Chandler
County Administrator REFERENCE: Project No. 98030167
THROUGH: James W. Davis, P.E.
Public Works Directo
AND
Roger D. Cain, P.E.DATE: April 24, 1998
County Engineer 4r e
FROM: Wilson Wetherington, Engineering Technician
SUBJECT: Request for Floodplain Cut and Fill Balance Waiver for Lot 12, Block 10,
Vero Lake Estates, Unit No. 1
DESCRIPTION AND CONDMONS
Ameron Homes, Inc. has submitted a building permit application for a single family residence on the
subject property. The site is located in an AE special flood hazard zone, base flood elevation 22.0
ft. N.G.V.D. In the attached letter from the applicant's engineer dated April 22, 1998, a waiver of
the cut and fill balance requirement is requested. The lot area is 1.06 acres. The volume of the 100
year floodplain displaced by the proposed grading plan is estimated to be 282 cubic yards.
ALTERNATIVES AND ANALYSIS
The waiver request has been reviewed by staff and appears to meet the criteria of Section
930.07(2)(d)4. Of the Stormwater Management and Flood Protection Ordinance for lots located in
the Vero Lake Estates Municipal Services Taxing Unit.
Alterative No. 1
Grant the art and fill balance waiver on the criteria of Section 930.07(2)(d)4.
Alternative No. 2
Deny the cut and fill waiver. Require an on site retention area be provided to compensate for the
proposed floodplain displacement.
RECOMMENDATIONS
Staff recommends approval of Alternative No. 1.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams,
SECONDED by Commissioner Ginn, the Board
unanimously granted the cut and fill balance waiver
to Ameron Homes, Inc. for Lot 12, Block 10, Vero
Lake Estates, Unit No. 1, as recommended by staff.
MAY 59 1998
•
0
11.G.2. FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT DISTRIBUTION LINE
RELOCATION - KINGS HIGHWAY (58TH AVENUE)
IMPROVEMENTS - MAIN RELIEF CANAL BRIDGE
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of April 28, 1998:
TO: James Chandler
County Administrator
THROUGH: James W. Davis, P.E. ��
Public Works Director
FROM: Terry B. Thompson, P.EX)
Capital Projects Manager
SUBJECT: Florida Power & Light Distribution Line Relocation
Kings Highway (58 Avenue) Improvements
Main Relief Canal Bridge
DATE: April 28, 1998
DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS
Attached is a Facilities Relocation Agreement between Indian River County and Florida
Power & Light Company (FPL) for the temporary relocation of distribution facilities on the
west side of Kings Highway at the Main Relief Canal. These lines must be temporally
relocated during construction of the new bridge over the Main Relief Canal as part of the
Kings Highway Improvements Project. The estimated cost for this relocation work is
$23,102.00. The agreement notes that final billing will reflect actual field costs not to
exceed 110% of the estimated cost $25,412.20. After the work is completed, FPL will send
a final invoice to the County for remittance.
FPL has requested that the County execute and return three copies of the Agreement.
After the Agreements have been executed by FPL, one original will be returned to the
County.
• _i! 1•1 r
Staff recommends that the Board approve the attached agreement at a not -to -exceed cost
of $25,412.20. Funding is from Account #101-214-541-068.31
MOTION WAS MADE by Commissioner Eggert,
SECONDED by Commissioner Ginn, that the Board
approve the Facilities Relocation Agreement with
Florida Power & Light Company at a not -to -exceed
cost of $25,412.20, as recommended by staff.
Under discussion, Commissioner Macht noted that the backup says the cost may not
exceed 110% of the estimate. He believed it should read "100/6' rather than "1100/o".
County Attorney Vitunac assured Commissioner Macht that the cost could be no more
than 10% of the quoted $23,102 and asked for that understanding to appear as a part of the
minutes.
MAY 5, 1998
-35- EG ? i o zi FAUc -tri
r UL
THE C CALLED THE QUESTION and
the Motion passed unanimously.
AGREEMENT IS ON FILE IN THE OFFICE
OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
11.H. SEBASTIAN HIGHLANDS WATER EXPANSION PHASE
_ H -A - RESOLUTIONS I AND II
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of April 27, 1998:
DATE: APRIL 27, 1998
TO: JAMES E. CHANDLER
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
FROM: DONALD R. HUBBS
DIRECTOR OF UTIL RVICES
PREPARED JAMES D. CHAS
T
AND STAFFED MANAGER OF A E E PROJECTS
BY: DEPARTMENT OF L SERVICES
SUBJECT: SEBASTIAN HIGHLANDS WATER EXPANSION PHASE H -A
RESOLUTIONS I AND II
INDIAN RIVER COUNTYPROJECT NO. UW -96 -20 -DS
BACKGROUND
On September 29, 1995, Indian River County entered into an Interlocal Agreement with
the Cite of Sebastian to assume ownership of the City's water distribution and
waste%vater collection systems. As a part of the contract, the County agreed to expand
the water distribution system. On June 18, 1996, the Indian River Countv Board of
County Commissioners approved Option 1 in order for the County to proceed with the
installation of water lines as set forth in the Interlocal Agreement between Indian River
County and the City of Sebastian. (See attached memorandum and copy of minutes.)
aici agreement provided for the transfer of the City of Sebastian's water and wastewater
sYstems to Indian River County.
On July 9, 1996, the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County adopted
?rdinance No. 96-13, ;which created a Municipal Services Benefit Unit (MSBU) for the
City of Sebastian authorizing the levy of special assessments to fund water and sewer
!ine extensions. (See attached memorandum and copy of minutes.)
011 Auaus; 27, 1996 at a public hearing, the Indian River County Board of County
Cummissiuners approved Phase I of the three proposed phases. Phase I is now
ompletea,
3 `:ALYSIS
Within the Phase II project area between CR 512 and Main Street, there are 3,461 lots.
This area gill be 160% the size of the recently completed Phase I project. Approxi-natety
501b of the lots have existing residences (some 1.750 homes) to benefit from this proj :ci.
l ypical lot sizes are .25 acre, plus or minus.
More effective management of project construction, inspections, cash flows, and
irteractior. with property owners will be accomplished by dividing Phases II and III into
smaller projects. See attached letter from Thomas Frame, City Manager of the Cin• of
Sebastian. who has also requested that this water expansion project include smaller,
more manageable projects for the city and the County. This will enable more utility
construction companies to bid on these projects making the bid process. more
!--umpetitivC. The attached map displays the area to benefit from the assessment
projects. as divided intu Parts A. B. C, D, and E for Phase II.
MAY 59 1998
-36-
C
•
Engineering design has been completed by the staff of the Department of Utilitv
Services for Phase II -A. We are now ready to begin the assessment process associated
«•ith this project, as outlined. The assessment roll for Phase 11-A is attached. This
project is to be paid through the assessment of property owners along the proposed
water line route. Financing will be from the assessment fund, with inter -fund
borrowing from the water impact fee fund (472) and operations and maintenance fund
(471).
The estimated project cost and amount to be assessed for Phase H -A is $981,641.46.
The estimated cost per square foot is $0.191713 (rounded).
The estimated cost of Phase II is greater than Phase I, primarily due to a higher ratio of
improvements, concrete driveways, more stringent restoration specifications, and
conservancy with the estimate, as well as a smaller area of property to distribute the
cost over. The assessed cost, as with any project, will be regulated by the degree of
competition at the bidding of the project.
On April 22, 1998, a letter was sent to the City Manager, Thomas Frame, Citi• of
Sebastian with a copy of this agenda item and a map of the Phase II -A (Phase II) project
area.
RECOMMENDATION
The staff of the Department of Utility Services recommends that the Board of Countv
Commissioners approve the attached Resolutions I and 11 and set the public hearing
date.
MAY 59 1998
ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert,
SECONDED by Commissioner Ginn, the Board
unanimously adopted Resolution 98-055 providing
for the Sebastian Area Phase H -A Water Expansion
(an area located West of Roseland Road and North
of CR#512); providing the total estimated cost,
method of payment of assessments, number of
annual installments, and legal description of the area
specifically served.
�/ I � p i``' ti e; � Pp
Parcel
Proiect Nc.
Lots
I.D. Nos. Location
I1 -A UW -96 -20 -DS
479
449
West of Roseland Road in Lhe SE corner
i1 -E UW -97 -11 -DS
758
714
East of Roseland Road to Vocelle Avenue
,,-C LV -97 -12 -DS
562
515
North from Vocelle Avenue along Layport
Drive
II -D UW -97 -13 -DS
636
608
North from Layport Drive west from Fleming
Street
ii -E UW -97 -14 -DS
1,025
912
East of Fleming Street; including Main Street
to Louisiana Avenue
Total Lots
3.461
3,208
Parcel I.D. Nos.
Engineering design has been completed by the staff of the Department of Utilitv
Services for Phase II -A. We are now ready to begin the assessment process associated
«•ith this project, as outlined. The assessment roll for Phase 11-A is attached. This
project is to be paid through the assessment of property owners along the proposed
water line route. Financing will be from the assessment fund, with inter -fund
borrowing from the water impact fee fund (472) and operations and maintenance fund
(471).
The estimated project cost and amount to be assessed for Phase H -A is $981,641.46.
The estimated cost per square foot is $0.191713 (rounded).
The estimated cost of Phase II is greater than Phase I, primarily due to a higher ratio of
improvements, concrete driveways, more stringent restoration specifications, and
conservancy with the estimate, as well as a smaller area of property to distribute the
cost over. The assessed cost, as with any project, will be regulated by the degree of
competition at the bidding of the project.
On April 22, 1998, a letter was sent to the City Manager, Thomas Frame, Citi• of
Sebastian with a copy of this agenda item and a map of the Phase II -A (Phase II) project
area.
RECOMMENDATION
The staff of the Department of Utility Services recommends that the Board of Countv
Commissioners approve the attached Resolutions I and 11 and set the public hearing
date.
MAY 59 1998
ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert,
SECONDED by Commissioner Ginn, the Board
unanimously adopted Resolution 98-055 providing
for the Sebastian Area Phase H -A Water Expansion
(an area located West of Roseland Road and North
of CR#512); providing the total estimated cost,
method of payment of assessments, number of
annual installments, and legal description of the area
specifically served.
�/ I � p i``' ti e; � Pp
r.1t,L
Providing (First Reso.)
RESOLUTION NO. 98- 55
4/98(reso/seb11a)Vk/DC
A RESOLUTION OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, PROVIDING FOR
THE SEBASTIAN AREA PHASE II -A WATER EXPANSION (AN AREA
LOCATED WEST OF ROSELAND ROAD AND NORTH OF CR#512);
PROVIDING THE TOTAL ESTIMATED COST, METHOD OF PAYMENT OF
ASSESSMENTS, NUMBER OF ANNUAL INSTALLMENTS, AND LEGAL
DESCRIPTION OF THE AREA SPECIFICALLY SERVED.
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County has determined
that the improvements herein described are necessary to promote the public welfare of the
county and has determined to defray the cost thereof by special assessments against certain
properties to be serviced by a water main extension to Phase II -A of the Sebastian Area
(located west of Roseland Road and north of CR#512), hereinafter referred to as Project No.
UW -96 -20 -DS;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, as follows:
1. The County does hereby determine that a waterline shall be installed to benefit 449 parcels
in southeast comer of an area west of Roseland Road and North of CR#512, and that the
cost thereof shall be specially assessed in accordance with the provisions of Sections
206.01 through 206.09 of the Code of Indian River County.
2. The total estimated cost to be assessed is $981,641.46 or $0.191713 per square foot to be
paid by the property specially benefited as shown on the assessment plat on file with the
Department of Utility Services. Assessments are to be levied against all lots and lands
adjoining and contiguous or bounding and abutting upon the improvements or specially
benefited thereby and further designated by the assessment plat with respect to the special
assessments.
3. A special assessment in the amount of $0.191713 per square foot shall be assessed
against each of the properties designated on the assessment plat. This assessment may
be raised or lowered by action of the Board of County Commissioners after the public
hearing, at the same meeting, as required by the referenced County Code.
4. The special assessments shall be due and payable and may be paid in full within 90 days
after the date of the resolution of the Board with respect to credits against the special
assessments after completion of the improvements (the "Credit Date") without interest. If
not paid in full, the special assessments may be paid in ten equal yearly installments of
principal plus interest. If not paid when due, there shall be added a penalty of 1-1/2% of the
principal not paid when due. The unpaid balance of the special assessments shall bear
interest until paid at a rate to be determined by the Board of County Commissioners when
the project is completed.
MAY 59 1998
I
RESOLUTION NO. 98-55
5. There is presently on file with the Department of Utility Services a plat showing the area to
be assessed, plans and specifications, and an estimate of the cost of the proposed
improvements. All of these are open to inspection by the public at the Department of Utility
Services.
6. An assessment roll with respect to the special assessments shall promptly be prepared in
connection with the special assessments.
7. Upon the adoption of this resolution, the Indian River County Utility Services Department
shall cause this resolution (along with a map showing the areas to be served) to be
published at least one time in the Vero Beach Press Journal before the public hearing
required by Section 206.04.
The resolution was moved for adoption by Commissioner Eggert , and the motion was
seconded by Commissioner Gi nn
follows: and, upon being put to a vote, the vote was as
Chairman John W. Tippin
Aye
Vice Chairman Kenneth R. Macht
Aye
Commissioner Carolyn K. Eggert
Aye
Commissioner Caroline D. Ginn
Aye
Commissioner Fran B. Adams
Aye
The Chairman thereupon declared the resolution duly passed and adopted this s
day of May , 1998.
Atte
By:
J. on, Clerk
MAY 59 1998
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
By.
John . 'TiPpirl, grfWaffien
-39-
Inman Rva Ca i Approve4 F_Da:e
�■rsMMUJFnE?
�MA'.r,Ls'�
OMWEIKTM
�►TT./L'��7
'` G
r
ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert,
SECONDED by Commissioner Ginn, the Board
unanimously adopted Resolution 98-056 setting a
time and place at which the owners of properties
located in the Sebastian Phase II -A Water Expansion
Area (in the Southeast comer of an area West of
Roseland Road and North of CR#512) and other
interested persons, may appear before the Board of
County Commissioners and be heard as to the
propriety and advisability of constructing the water
main extension, as to the cost thereof, as to the
manner of payment thereof, and as to the amount
thereofto be specially assessed against each property
benefited thereby.
Time and Place (Second Reso.) 4/98(reso/seblla)WIDC
RESOLUTION NO. 98- 56
A RESOLUTION OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, SETTING A TIME
AND PLACE AT WHICH THE OWNERS OF PROPERTIES LOCATED IN
THE SEBASTIAN PHASE II -A WATER EXPANSION AREA (IN THE
SOUTHEAST CORNER OF AN AREA WEST OF ROSELAND ROAD AND
NORTH OF CR#512) AND OTHER INTERESTED PERSONS, MAY
APPEAR BEFORE THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS AND BE
HEARD AS TO THE PROPRIETY AND ADVISABILITY OF
CONSTRUCTING THE WATER MAIN EXTENSION, AS TO THE COST
THEREOF, AS TO THE MANNER OF PAYMENT THEREFOR, AND AS TO
THE AMOUNT THEREOF TO BE SPECIALLY ASSESSED AGAINST EACH
PROPERTY BENEFITED THEREBY.
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County has, by
Resolution No. 98- 55 , determined that it is necessary for the public welfare of the citizens of
the county, and particularly as to those living, working, and owning property within the area
described hereafter, that a waterline be installed to serve 449 parcels located in the southeast
comer of an area west of Roseland Road and North of CR#512; and
WHEREAS, it has been determined that the cost to be specially assessed with respect
thereto shall be $0.191713 per square foot; and
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners has caused an assessment roll to be
completed and filed with the Clerk to the Board; and
WHEREAS, Section 206.06, Indian River County Code, requires that the Board of
County Commissioners shall fix a time and place at which the owners of the properties to be
assessed or any other persons interested therein may appear before the Board of County
Commissioners and be heard as to the propriety and advisability of constructing such water
main extension, as to the cost thereof, as to the manner of payment therefor, and as to the
amount thereof to be assessed against each property benefited thereby,
MAY 59 1998
-a0-
0 0
RESOLUTION NO. 98-56
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, as follows:
1. The County Commission shall meet at the County Commission Chambers in the County
Administration Building at the hour of 9:05 a.m. on Tuesday, May 26, 1998, at which time
the owners of the properties to be assessed and any other interested persons may appear
before said Commission and be heard in regard thereto. The area to be improved and the
properties to be specially benefited are more particularly described upon the assessment
plat and the assessment roll with regard to the special assessments.
2. All persons interested in the construction of said improvements and the special
assessments against the properties to be specially benefited may review the assessment
plat showing the area to be assessed, the assessment roll, the plans and specifications for
said improvements, and an estimate of the cost thereof at the office of the Department of
Utility Services any week day from 8:30 a.m. until 5:00 p.m.
3. Notice of the time and place of this public hearing shall be given by two publications in the
Press Journal Newspaper one week apart. The last publication shall be at least one week
prior to the date of the hearing.
4. The Indian River County Department of Utility Services shall give the owner of each
property to be specially assessed at least ten days notice in writing of such time and place,
which shall be served by mailing a copy of such notice to each of such property owners at
his last known address.
The resolution was moved for adoption by Commissioner Eggert , and the motion
was seconded by Commissioner Gi nn , and, upon being put to a vote, the vote was as
follows:
Chairman John W. Tippin Aye
Vice Chairman Kenneth R. Macht Aye
Commissioner Carolyn K. Eggert Aye
Commissioner Caroline D. Ginn Aye
Commissioner Fran B. Adams Aye
The Chairman thereupon declared the resolution duly passed and adopted this 5
day of May 1998.
st:
J. K. B , Clerk
Attachment: ASSESSMENT ROLL
MAY 59 1998
-41-
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
By ,
Jo�hn
India Rna Ca Approved Dita
Aamirt
t 4
Te-PI
sud�-I101
a
Uev L
Risk Mgr.
r
EO;Jr rol r�1Lc'-
Resolution 98-56
PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT SUMMARY
SEBASTIAN WATER EXPANSION PHASE II -A
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY PROJECT NO. U W - 96 - 20- D S
TOTAL ESTIMATED PROJECT CONSTRUCTION
COST INCLUDING ENGINEERING AND ADMINISTRATION $981,641.46
TOTAL NET SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PROPERTIES
TO BE ASSESSED 5,120,374
ESTIMATED ASSESSMENT COST PER SQUARE FOOT $0.19171284363
ROUNDED $0.191713
APRIL 13, 1998
J. D. C.
SBPHIIA2.WK4
ASSESSMENT ROLL IS ON FILE IN THE
OFFICE OF THE CLERK
TO THE BOARD
MAY 59 1998
-QQ""•'iy� �T7i 4N� �rY
r.
�� t` Il 7CAT11C 'LCZ L[I ��.
JIF
Y yyyy;�C)�w��`�aL 1'LR�l
F
C
! �rYaM
�� � ,7'YIv1F TT 'ad�Q 1_ � Qy.=.�A .�•.r
s.ac scz sa�c�i L�f r�,7grl�hh.0ir Ir
S a +1tlLFY@L+CHG �rz'vra x.
y-` � ��'m� SIAfi7AWWWAk ����� tiU►S,L�JHi'+uw Joy
r ., lhf FPr RR�r-. �z_ •
i+ v Z ii vQ vQ '1l�rL"L�E+tlYlS y SIR T JtJtlNdYltl"'yyN� s�
� '� �� ti�row�cz AGkWWGWppC sr�„s[�x� � ri,prnfann�ri
l7CCY2iPER 'ReemK z-�' JII�IIM�4�Fli ��'K •
•�ce�r�sl c�,a.RWWN�#WfiiSlk.SiWNlii�i� � rgrerGryq:' �.
t" O�*Q YLF�rCCCMQi 2LNCt"CH�"!� litlbNHlt+� yuciWar. fir,
� � � �,l�1Fdd iSiWNWFiFliATiR AANAFfiWW�2 S1pNMWR x ': ny f i�.,�
� i:rr y�rt rr: '��tlHCCktCrHHYN rH Sd6tlHBkt � _ �' ��s
arcs
.�d>Lu-�rssca Wk1�RS�Jr�86Wf�iAl.�� 711GWfiWR
D� rY aci a cr -r n.S ,c'E v. r
saa Q za�a�9� EtE�tlNH�'tlYE.i rr �y
sccs��u�Z[r xcr kiiWR 1" SIWNk 1°a ry nra Z
f =rz sa W)a Toa sa Za mar diw i+
II sv scr z[r Zrr acv =
so
Cr in aua.i y upP�YtHt 'YdtlB�>Tn tivi3�°��
tri s>ti aR z+rs saz 70LZ S��IWWR,GTi�FLWW'Fi�SSI na>r u �� ....
0 iQ ZQ Mu 3C 2 �.r?'St+9 lusl 3� £�r y[r Sa •y���
ma a[7Lr Zcr MLX Xrj.4 I.O aoa rn '•
2A TR' DQ'1<1Q Z M1t{MR
a 1 7CR 7178 aaR aeRs>va Zer Zv aua sur Ica a Za v y.
u s� tri x rs aca ca za crz �_ de 1C
�a sa}f��L6L3bElf1LI313 t �a�srs yrs xQ is rr I r � , , �-WEI
za sQ v its my�a yrs rrz se-r �IwPQ�
�'sa 7CF[�17iE�k�AAric}F1T�I�! a�Q sets Za za �a>J n G ' �� nu as
,av�=�saue ecu sets scii xciaru axcr�r SIR wlirai oa ff_ � �'�dB
�► Q ��Za za 3.a>ou]LQ.Za 7eQ mr?Hca nQ n n
►Zrs:ZL ya 1oQ sa>GQza 7 Z¢ra ca yrr
ZSR rci Z�auct sa Za yYwF!f±f#!N2rL't Zu a vrzic
i 1t -1 a ar s t zsz xR >o� z z lifiMWWWfi�iit v¢ ri �a vv z' y +' ✓}�+ Ir
Zt.r a,��sa�>Ds Ti¢xci
�Q�Q xv mrs
��I� 4rr f y�LgG�LidfGt7 scz�>on:_sQ.z rr
W; MET
;M a
a tH@kHHkH za:w n �✓ 1 d 0 Q eu s o
I��jy QpG �a ttAIAQJq acct cart aaa aori 3L
m
n� ,i yes peer yF yhBBYyNrQtlBB�r�ex
��L'eeE0t�0Bt�E1E4'"Q yQ N�YI'EY�IYHFC �u hf S ��7W000gWgCgPYPe •v"
,�• {, • ItRRWFR makkWWWWWRWGFR�u Baa kW4iciQvU,-k 4
• �:.������ P����". u �; v�t.v►t.v►t ..t. s t.ra ► 4� :� .+ nG�l�K(Sl�6L,'. 'led
•• �S' t 1_, v f[9�.:3n.G12'vrrz SSR are'Url' isvc nr.AR�igk' r G, �� 1 �
i U I!2 11Fe S74S LQ 9r2 AQ Sf =]r'
//■ is a o Q sm ka WT virs ne v�nr�r t r.nii�nnifAi'7l��t y YNQL�'H@�L'CBr�BPE'rtleL'Qeie�a,
Z vmz,Q-'Ort z uz na net,pQ• O Y G 0 ca fa
srR 9Qionrt uv rur7 ?. ��(� 4 SFWFoR i oWOWOWP4F� so
z as v► �f nrs a z Q dQ y tlNt!} SAY 11EE►L�dCrL'�! MCI :'wt .,
Ja � r d�.`
r su� z raR aR�a►nt� aEtatl ,}b y ��'� b���< '�yi,j►�'1SAIi.9gMWiigWYNF� xu 57
t �k„y�`s !WIiYUW�iP - y, u►r ar:�.q ate¢` ( ► , >. L r DBC• �a r.
�ScLets!zEJ�nnnaaa.tia=;� 51 Utz pR.n!",,3{�t�; pd>t x�tr. "tty � �'� L?., �' U• qQ SI'tltlC.�b�d'�ctl qtr �a as
OF,
TFA
13.B. VICE CHAIRMAN MACHT - REPORT ON SHOCAP
(SERIOUS HABITUAL OFFENDERS COMPREHENSIVE
ACTION PROGRAM) MEETING
Vice Chairman Macht reported he attended the meeting in Orlando dealing with
juveniles. Indian River is the 341 county in Florida to adopt this program. The meeting was
also attended by representatives of the State Attorney's Office, police chiefs of all local
municipalities, the Public Defender's Office, Dr. Dearing from the School Board, and a
number of other people. This is an excellent program which will enhance safety for our
citizens and help to keep kids out of trouble. A fulsome report will be forthcoming.
14.A. EMERGENCY SERVICES DISTRICT
At 9:20 a.m., the Chairman announced a recess so the Board could convene as the
Board of Commissioners of the Emergency Services District. Those Minutes are being
prepared separately.
U.B. SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL DISTRICT
Upon adjournment of the Emergency Services District Meeting, the Board convened
as the Board of Commissioners of the Solid Waste Disposal District. Those Minutes are
being prepared separately.
The Chairman reconvened the Board as the Board of County Commissioners at 9:23
a.m. to hear the following.
15. PUBLIC HEARING - BEACH PRESERVATION PLAN
UPDATE
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of April 27, 1998:
MAY 59 1998
-45-
IJF:iCI7
TO: James E. Chandler,
County Administrator
TBROUM: James W. Davis, P.E.,
Public Works Director
FROM: Jeffrey •R. Tabar, /
Coastal Engineer I
SUBJECT: Beach Preservation Plan Update
DATE: April 27, 1998
On April 14, 1998, County staff presented the Board of County
Commissioners with the Beach Preservation Plan Update. The Board
approved setting a public discussion for May 5, 1998.
The existing Beach Preservation Plan was adopted in 1988 by the
Board of County Commissioners and has been revised by County staff.
The Beach Preservation Plan Update is presented herein and
identifies areas of predominate coastal erosion and presents a
preferred management strategy. The Plan includes an investigation
which evaluated the condition of the beaches between 1986 and 1997
and recommends specific project locations.
The Plan divides the County into eight planning Sectors with each
representing a portion of coastline that is considered uniform and
continuous in physical and jurisdictional boundaries. Each Sector
includes a recommended planning element.
AT IVES AbM ANALX rR
A two-tiered approach was recommended to address the County's
erosion problems:
1) Restore and maintain the beaches south of Sebastian Inlet
which have been adversely impacted by the Inlet's presence.
2) Restore and maintain areas of "critical erosion".
Four specific project locations were identified as follows:
1) Sebastian Inlet
2) Wabasso Beach
3) City of Vero Beach
4) South Beach Area
The Beach Preservation Plan Update was presented to and approved by
the County Beach & Shore Preservation Advisory Committee.
Staff recommends adoption of the Beach Preservation Plan Update.
MAY 59 1998
0
-46-
•
I
Commissioner Macht complimented staff on the updated Plan.
Public Works Director Jim Davis commented that the original Plan was adopted in
the 1980's. Coastal Engineer Jeff Tabar has worked hard and diligently to update the Plan
and will present it to the Board. He was excited about the update and hoped the Board
would approve the updated Plan.
Coastal Engineer Jeff Tabar noted that the purpose of the Plan is to protect the
County's coastal resources. For purposes of the Plan, the County has been divided into 8
sectors with the following recommended plans:
BREVARD COUNTY SECTOR
SENSn" axnR-I
SECTOR I
R-11
FA SECTOR 2
R-10
*-If
SECTOR 3
R-45 —
SECTOR 4
R -n —
SECTOR 5
MW RUCH
R -(!Q
R_DO SECTOR 6
R -W
R-1OO
nOMMN MAW SECTOR 7
1W M=ft= OF MW WACW
8-110
R-lIJ
SECTOR B
R-119
ST. LUCIE COUNTY
MAY 59 1998
Figure No. 1
(1998 Planning Sectors)
PLAN ELEMENTS
INLET BYPASSING/FEEDER BEACH
INLET BYPASSING/FEEDER BEACH
DUNE MAINTENANCE PROGRAM
BEACH RESTORATION PROJECT
NATURAL BEACH POLICY
BEACH RESTORATION PROJECT
NATURAL BEACH POLICY
BEACH RESTORATION PROJECT
NATURAL BEACH POLICY
-47-E��K Uzj f,,l �16.V
r �
;-j F�1Gc m.�9
11.1988 BEACH PRESERVATION PLAN
In 1988 Cubit Engineering prepared a Beach Preservation Plan (BPP) for
Indian River County. This plan reviewed past beach studies and presented
shoreline conditions up to 1986. Three major coastal features were emphasized
as having long lasting effects on the County's shoreline.
• Sebastian Inlet
• Offshore reef/rock outcrop system
• Large offshore shoal area
A number of alternatives were evaluated with respect to the County's
coastal erosion areas. Each alternative presented an unique solution which was
recommended for application in a specific area or sector. These alternatives
were also subjected to an economic evaluation to determine if they were cost
effective. The recommended alternatives were as follows:
• Beach restoration/nourishment
• Dune maintenance
• Shore parallel structures
• No action
The BPP divided the County into eight Sectors (Figure No.3) and
recommended 1 of 4 of the above alternatives for each Sector. Each Sector
represents a portion of the coastline within which the planning constraints are
considered uniform and continuous (Table No. 1). This sector delineation attempts
to include both physical coastal conditions and jurisdictional boundaries.
Table No. 1: Eiaht (8) Mananpmant Qm-tf%m f<,� conn moo
Sector No.
Location
FDEP Monument
Recommended Plan
Sector 1 - Sebastian Inlet
R1 - R11
Feeder Beach Project
Sector 2 - Ambersand
R11 - R19
No Action
Sector 3 - Wabasso Beach
R19-45
County DMD
Sector 4 - Indian River Shores
R45 - 71
Town DMD
Sector 5 - Vero Beach I
R71 - R86
City DMD &
Beach Restoration Project
Sector 6 - Vero Beach 11
R86 - R94
City DMD
Sector 7 - South County
R94 -113
County DMD
Sector 8 - Round Island
nom• nun _ n...- u--= ----- -• - • -
R113 - R119
No Action
Dune maintenance was recommended for five of the sectors, beach
restoration for Vero Beach, no action for two, and inlet bypassing for one. Also,
the BPP emphasized the restoration of Vero Beach and a Sebastian Inlet
bypassing system to be fundamental to solving the County's coastal erosion.
MAY 59 1998
SEBASTIAN
INET
9, ►u:o �"'m--
R-1
SEBASTIAN
INLET
STATE
RECREATION R-10
AREA
AMBERSAND
WABASSO
BEACH
SR 510 —R-40
HIGHWAY
AIA
INDIAN
RIVER
SHORES
a
SR 60
VERO
BEACH
R-100
SECTOR PLAN ELEMENTS
SECTOR 1 INLET BYPASSING FEEDER BEACH
SECTOR 2 NO ACTION — CSRS UNIT
SECTOR 3 COUNTY DUNE MAINTENANCE DIS i RICT
SECTOR 4 TOWN DUNE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT
SECTOR 5 CITY DUNE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT
BEACH RESTORATION PROJECT
SECTOR 6 CITY DUNE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT
SECTOR T COUNTY DUNE MAINTENANCE 01 „ICT
R-110
S? R—T79 I
SECTOR 8 NO ACTION — CSRS UNIT
Figure No.3
(1988 Planning Sectors)
PLAN SES., 0RS
4
MAY 59 1998
-49- L''_ ° 7
E'� �Lo' fr��L-L Y
L �$ �
III. PHYSICAL CONDITIONS
As a basis for updating the BPP shoreline and volumetric changes were
evaluated for the entire County to determine the condition of the beaches. These
changes were calculated using FDEP hydrographic survey data between 1986
and 1997. Survey information was collected every 1,000 ft. corresponding to
each of the R -monuments and extends 3,OOOft. offshore. The coastline was
divided into eight areas for evaluation and each area corresponds to one of the
planning Sectors outlined above. In considering the shoreline and volumetric
change trends within individual Sectors, it was necessary to divide a number of
Sectors into Sub -Sectors. These Sub -Sectors will be used to better identify
erosion and accretion tendencies along the coastline.
A. Dune & Shoreline Changer
Dune and shoreline changes are shown at three elevations; 0.0, 5.0, and
10.0 feet NGVD (Table No.2). The lower elevations are representative of the
changes which occur near the waterline and the higher elevations are
representative of the changes near the dry beach and dune. Figures No.4
through 6 illustrate the shoreline changes during the period between June 1986
and May 1997. A detailed analysis of shoreline change for each R -monument
can be found in Appendix A.
Table No.2: Shoreline Changes (Jun86-May97).
Note: 1. NegeGve (-) MMVM indrcates shmeirm re"Weroeron.
2. Shaded area irndicates fnatlter evakuWon B necessary to determine the true shorebrc change in Cris Sector.
A short discussion follows offering an explanation of the shoreline changes
in each of the planning Sectors. In. addition to shoreline changes, volumetric
changes are also presented in the subsequent section.
MAY 59 1998
Shoreline Change ft./ r.
Sector No.
Monument
0' NGVD
5' NGVD 10' NGVD
1 - Sebastian Inlet
R1 -R11
2.3
2.1
2.0
2-Ambersand
R11 -R19
-0.5
-1.7
0.4
3 - Wabasso Beach
R19 -R45
-2.5
-3.2
-0.3
4 - Indian River Shores
R45 -R71
4a
R45- R53
-2.1
-3.5
-0.1
4b
R53 -R71
5.1
2.9
2.9
5 - Vero Bead I
R71 -R86
5a
R71 -R77
2.8
1.9
1.2
5b
R77 -R86
-1.6
-2.3
-0.5
6 - Vero Beach II
R86 -R94
5.3
4.8
4.5
7 - South County
R94 -R113
7a
R94 -R100
4.7
4.3
6.0
7b
R100 -R107
-4.8
-0.8
-2.4
7c
R107 -R113
5.2
5.5
3.8
8 - Round Island
R113 -R119
2.7
2.0
2.3
Note: 1. NegeGve (-) MMVM indrcates shmeirm re"Weroeron.
2. Shaded area irndicates fnatlter evakuWon B necessary to determine the true shorebrc change in Cris Sector.
A short discussion follows offering an explanation of the shoreline changes
in each of the planning Sectors. In. addition to shoreline changes, volumetric
changes are also presented in the subsequent section.
MAY 59 1998
EREVARG COUNTY
SC949aw varr
D-10
I SEcroR +o
alorw IPNnP � A`y —14�-�
SECTOR y
MAY 59 1998
Shoreline Change (ft/yr)
0.0 ft NGVD
A)/
Erasion Accretion
SECTOR so
10.0
o Feeder Bea '97
w-;7
WPO BMW
�I
SECTOR 90
1111
j
D-QD
A -lo
SECTOR 6
R16
SECTOR 70
R20
t-rgg
riaPAU N aMCM
SECTOR 70
r>g MUCOMM or WPO WACM
a-107
a_rro
ACTOR 7c
would
D-*rJ
SECTOR B
ST LUCiE
MAY 59 1998
Shoreline Change (ft/yr)
0.0 ft NGVD
Erasion Accretion
-10.0 -5.0 0.0 5.0
10.0
o Feeder Bea '97
i�
R7
�I
1111
j
R16
R20
R24
R28
would
R32
ij
R37
I�—(
R46
�
rr•
R50
1155
R59
�I
1164
R68
j r i
R74
Ur
R79
R83
R87
��-
R92
P'Mmm I
R97
mm -mm
11101
R106
R110
R115
R119
Figure No.4
(Shoreline Change Rates - 0.0 NGVD -1986-1997)
-51-
�'�'
—K FAG, --tA
BRE✓ARC COUNTY
sFB.srnw elan a_, T_
SECTOR
4_,Q
AURFOSW
SECTOR 7
SECTOR J
0- 5
SECTOR 40
a -u
SECTOR 4b
Shoreline Change (ft/yr)
5.0 ft NGVD
Erosion, Accretion
No —Do-
-10.0
► -10.0 -5.0 0.0 5.0 10.0
R2
.97
R7
R11
R16
R20
R24
R28
R32
R37
R46
R50
R55
R59
R64
R68
R74
R79
R83
R87
R92
R97
8101
8106
8110
8115
R119
MAY 59 1998
Figure No.5
(Shoreline Change Rates - 5.0 NGVD -1986-1997)
� , ,I rd F'JI - `20
- a -n
SECTOR so
a-77
VM Mar
4-ao
a-0
ScT7OR Sb
,-so
SECTOR 6
SEC'OR 76
a-,00
RLOJUMN BEAa,
o=. cR 7b
nrt woranros �' vDao eFro,
a_rro
SEC -GR 7c
—..J
rZ""UR H
z_•r9
MAY 59 1998
Figure No.5
(Shoreline Change Rates - 5.0 NGVD -1986-1997)
� , ,I rd F'JI - `20
BREVARC COUNTY
SIMM" ^U7 ..
0-/0
MM OWN
+xc/w.mu/ tea+
tME row�avcs � rano auu.
a-r/t
MAY 5, 1998
A -f
SECTOR
N -r/
SECTOR i
SECTOR -T
0-45
SECTOR 4a
!7 -SJ
SECTOR 4b
4-7t
SECTOR :a
a -n
SECTOR
SECTOR S
S£CMR 7c
a-/oo
S£CZ7R 75
a -/o7
SECXR 7c
7-•:J
Sr
C.CR 3
Shoreline Change (ft/yr)
10.0 ft NGVD
— Erosion Accretion _
-10.0 -5.0 0.0 5.0 10.0
R4
'97
R8
R13
R1177
R22
R25
R29
R34
R43
R47
R52
R56
R61
R65
R71
R76
R80
R84
R89
R93
R98
R103
R107
R112
R116
Figure No.6
(Shoreline Change Rates -10.0 NGVD -1986-1997)
-53-
r,iU
The County coastline experienced a total net loss (including the beach &
submerged areas) of approximately 1,268,897 cubic yards. Also occurring during
the period of analysis was several major inlet bypassing efforts and dune
maintenance operations. Between 1986 and 1997, it is reported that the
Sebastian Inlet Taxing District placed 680,500 cubic yards south of the Inlet and
the City of Vero Beach has placed, on average, 10,000 cubic yards per year on
City park property. Considering both apparent losses from the profile data and
the additional sand volume placed into the system, the total or adjusted losses
become 2,059,397 cubic yards. Therefore, the equivalent annual erosion rate
becomes 187,218 cubic yards per year. Further analysis indicates approximately
59,000 and 128,000 cubic yards per year were eroded from the beach and
submerged regions, respectively. The magnitude of volumetric changes within
the submerged area is twice that of the beach area. The possibility exists that
the hardbottom may be a factor influencing this increased sand loss. Further
evaluation is necessary to determine the effects of the hardbottom.
Table No.3: Volumetric Changes (Jun86-May97).
Note: 1. Negative (-) number irKbeates erosion.
Sector 1
Overall volumetric erosion has occurred in this Sector. While the beaches
experienced erosion the submerged region accreted slightly. Recent inlet
bypassing efforts have relieved some of the erosion in this Sector, however, the
historic effects of the Inlet's presence have left the downdrift beaches scarred.
MAY 59 1998
Volumetric Change
/ft/
Sector No.
Monument
BeachSubmerged
Above ).Oft
NGVD
Below 0. Oft
NGVD
Total
Rate
1 - Sebastian Inlet
R1 -R11
-2.0
0.2
-1.8
2 - Ambersand
R11 -R19
-2.4
-2.0-4.4
3 - Wabasso Beach
R19 -R45
-1.3
-1.9
-3.2
4 - Indian River Shores
R45 -R71
4a
R45- R53
-1.4
-1.6
-3.0
4b
R53 -R71
2.2
-1.0
1.2
5 - Vero Beach I
R71 -R86
58
R71 -R77
0.3
-1.3
-1.0
5b
R77 -R86
2.0
-1.0
-3.0
6 - Vero Beach II
R86 -R94
1.7
1.8
3.5
7 - South County
R94 -R113
7a
R94 -R100
1.7
2.1
3.8
7b
R100 -R107
-2.3
-3.2
-5.5
7c
R107 -R113
1.9
-1.0
0.9
8 - Round Island
R113 -R119
0.8 I
-1.0
-0.2
Note: 1. Negative (-) number irKbeates erosion.
Sector 1
Overall volumetric erosion has occurred in this Sector. While the beaches
experienced erosion the submerged region accreted slightly. Recent inlet
bypassing efforts have relieved some of the erosion in this Sector, however, the
historic effects of the Inlet's presence have left the downdrift beaches scarred.
MAY 59 1998
3RE✓ARG COUNTY
SE9071" W-" 1. A—r
SECTOR i
9-10
R_rt
SECTOR 2
A- rg
A-70
SECTOR 3
K.ea4a eueM
-.o
A-70 SECTOR 40
mom A/KR SNORES R -y
SECTOR 4b
Volumetric Change (cy/ft/yr)
Above 0.0 R NGVD
Erosion Accretion
ad 0-
-6.0 -4.0 -2.0 0.0 2.0 4.0
S7 _ C,:= :0�,bi7v
Figure No.7
(Volumetric Change Rates - Beach - 1986-1997)
MAY 59 1998
R1
R8
R15
R22
R29
R36
R43
R50
R57
R64
R71
R78
R85
R92
R99
R106
R113
n
-55- E01� '� j Fi r— -', 3j
SECTOR 5a
A -n
VERA eucN A -!p
SECTOR 5b
A�Q
A-Rp
SECTOR 6
A-�
SECTOR 7a
q-100
FLOOL oN BEACH I
SEC—CR 7b
a_e07
ME IIOGI�KS � YERO 9FjIC,V
a -'+c
SEC. R 7c
SECTOR P
Volumetric Change (cy/ft/yr)
Above 0.0 R NGVD
Erosion Accretion
ad 0-
-6.0 -4.0 -2.0 0.0 2.0 4.0
S7 _ C,:= :0�,bi7v
Figure No.7
(Volumetric Change Rates - Beach - 1986-1997)
MAY 59 1998
R1
R8
R15
R22
R29
R36
R43
R50
R57
R64
R71
R78
R85
R92
R99
R106
R113
n
-55- E01� '� j Fi r— -', 3j
EREVARD COUN7v
SEWT.A 0417 -
A -I
Volumetric Change (cyKUyr)
Below 0.0 R NGVD
Erosion Accretion
— _
-6.0 -4.0 20 0.0 2.0 4.0
SECTOR t
A -IQ
A_II
SECTOR 2
A-19
SECTOR JT
A-dJ
•-1Q SECTOR 4a
No" MAN SMOM 4-33
SECTOR •Q
i Is:
SECTOR B0 I I �
vu0 Brach A-eQ r
SECTOR
i r
A -Q6 i s:
SECTOR 6 1
Fs,
r r
SECTOR 7c I !
A'IQQ
FLO&LMN SICK I SEC'OR 7b r
?W +Cavan`s Qr vEMQ z
A- I t0 SECTOR 7c i
a-:rJ ,
_ A-rr9
Figure No.8
(Volumetric Change Rates - Submerged -1986-1997)
MAY 59 1998
ik A F7, r
E,0U �� tj rAGL �1V'
R1
R9
R18
R27
R36
R45
R54
R63
R72
R81
R90
R99
R108
R117
Countywide Program
• Perform biannual beach surveys and aerial photograph.
• Perform a Countywide sand search survey.
• Conduct an economic analysis to determine sources of local funding
Sector 1
• Support adoption of the Inlet Management Plan.
• Obtain cooperative agreements for sand
Taxing District. placement with the Sebastian Inlet
• Secure State funds for the design, construction and monitoring of a feeder
beach'Project between R4 and R11.
• Coordinate County beach surveys with the existing annual monitorin
Performed by the District. 9 Program
Sector 2
• Secure State funds for the design, construction and monitoring of a feeder
beach project between R11 and R17.
Sector 3
• Secure State funds for the design, construction and monitoring of a beach
restoration project between R37 and R45.
• Dune Maintenance
Sector. Program is recommended for the remainder of the
S
Sector 4
• Maintain a "Natural Beach Policy' in this sector.
ARGLOUS
• Complete the 3 year monitorin
monitorin g Program for the breakwater project. ,,,e
9 Program will be completed November 1999.
• Secure State $ Federal funds for the design, construction and monitoring of a
beach restoration project between R77 and R86.
Sector 6
• Maintain a 'Natural Beach Policy' in this sector.
—ectcr 7
• Secure State funds for the design, construction and monitoring of a beach
restoration project between R100 and R107.
Sector 8
• Maintain a 'Natural Beach Policy" in this sector.
MAY 59 1998
—57- j, FtiCL c��
Mr. Tabar continued that the County's coast is 22 miles long and 13 of those miles,
or 60% of the total, are critically eroded. In answer to questions from the Board, he
explained that "natural beach policy" would encompass monitoring the area every 2 years.
The entire Plan is estimated to cost 20 million dollars over the next 11 years and it is
anticipated that the State will contribute 50% of those funds. Local contributions are
estimated to be 8 million out of the 20 million which would come from local county and
municipal funding.
Commissioner Adams commended Mr. Tabar and Director Davis for their efforts and
thanked the Beach and Shore Preservation Advisory Committee for their input. She asked
everyone to remember that the Plan is very fluid and has been set up so that the process will
pick up "hot spots" as they occur.
Commissioner Macht questioned whether the Sebastian Inlet Tax District will share
a part of the cost of the Plan and whether they would replace the sand lost as a result of the
Inlet.
Mr. Tabar noted that the Inlet causes a loss of approximately 70,000 cubic yards of
sand per year which does not take into account any historical loss. Mr. Tabar did not believe
the District has any intention of doing anything about the historical loss of sand.
Commissioner Macht felt the citizens of Vero Beach and the County should note that
tourists come here for the beach and we are already losing a certain number of these visitors
due to the alarming loss of beach in the County. He noted that a true analysis of the tourism
contribution to the County has never been made. However, if we lose our attractions for
tourists, our tax situation will not be pretty. Every resident has a big stake in beach
protection.
Chairman Tippin wished everyone could remember how the beaches looked before.
They used to have football games in front of the Ocean Grille and you could walk out to the
reefs at low tide. The beaches are as important to the economy of the whole County as citrus
and this affects everyone. He offered his compliments on the Plan to staff.
Commissioner Ginn congratulated staff for breaking the project down into "doable"
sections and for their fine presentation. She emphasized that the South Beach Property
Owners' Association overwhelmingly approved the updated Plan. She then expressed her
concern that nothing will be done in Sector 7 until the year 2002.
MAY 59 1998
-58-
0
Coastal Engineer Jeff Tabar then explained the proposed projects by sector and the
estimated costs involved pursuant to the following:
BREVARD COUNTY
s
�Id
A
d
QC
O
k
2
aX
C~j
s
U
ao
o
CLu
to R
Q
mt.
Q
a
V
�
r�
�d
�d
MAY 5, 1998
Figure No. 12
(1998 Planning Sectors 1 & 2)
-59-
-2
•
i
to
T
co
m o
o w
w
90
TREASURE SHORES
WABASSO Ch1 /SARK
INDIAN RIVER SHORES BEACH �i J
mans
maea�r
BEACH. FILL BUNE MAINTENANCE PROGRAM
SECTOR 4 SECTOR 3
'NATURAL BEACH POLICY'
m
0
c�
�r ,l
14—
Coq
i
W
M -n
315
2• c
ro �
m o
o �+
90
0)
CASTAWAY VERO BEACH
9!
q lk covE ACONN BEACH �i 1 lq�iI 1
saieur
BEACH FILL
• cY
SECTOR 6 SECTOR 5
'NATURAL BEACH POLICY'
lim
•
•
O�
N
•
a
co
(o
00
w al
243
� m
m o
0
90
co
9l`
THE MOORINGS
N ANGLERS COVE ,�40
J
� 11101aM'
C BEACH PILL L STRUCTUREW
'C I uuu cy
SECTOR 8 SECTOR 7
'NATURAL BEACH PEILICY•
v
I✓
\O
00
G
:+c
�.s 7
Table No.4
Desdoon
Long Range Beach Erosion Control Budget Program - Estimated Plan Costs
Prepared by: Indian River County - Public Works Deapartment - Coastal Eni
Y9719F, F'(98/99
FwAwml I SMM I 1 —Ad `;.,.7wM1 --. l FsA.rslii 1 ....-1 a .'F -M
Division
a. -f- 1 --- I
ueWedd - o .neo.t-Ouc7dnA r,uuuu.r M Lam Mamr. lrucryosr A i,YYUR.I
9U.uuu
Du,WU
y.-�•1QO,OV
of UUU
Sr,WO
:;,1:..11!,000•
100,000
100,000
BeachProlUea
50.000
t{Q;
25,000
�> d ,4p0
25.000
25,000
:.':f•lO,OtI
Aerial Photography
15.000
15,000
jY �bti00
Sand Search Investigation
50,000
50,000
,
V,;
i }d
•,•. , ° � �,
Ecolnordc Anaysla - Beach Preservation District
75,000
1 •.. , ; .060.
4sa,"k.,
"• ; > .* .'. .
6laobdr •1 'r Foedei abii R44111
Design (80cyM X 7,0000.) - maximum volume allowed
" ! x '
50,000
50.000
htIb,000
Permittfig
a" y,<
25.000
25.000
;r } s 1 ^,
100,000
100 000
t�:'A149g000
Construction
s r:f; x
$ :r..
4.480.000
Monitoring
! } .,
4
50,000
50,000
slie6tar�= .alder6titiahPr sptRti�t!'tl" ,d .t .
�s-
' �: M.; `.rl.:¢l;
1 •i 4 -
Design (40cyM X 8,0008.) -
i y;
75,000E25,000
PaMMV
. ' t`
25,000
'; I
Construction
080,000
NO 000
s,'1• �, 1,
MaflftOttrlg
50.000
50.000
srlmr a'- tlaami tlesiNrattoe 1�7•R44 a oun.
_ � : v,
,;
1?•; 1' it .*�y:
ueWedd - o .neo.t-Ouc7dnA r,uuuu.r M Lam Mamr. lrucryosr A i,YYUR.I
9U.uuu
Du,WU
y.-�•1QO,OV
of UUU
Sr,WO
:;,1:..11!,000•
100,000
100,000
Permitting
r; a ...
25,000
�> d ,4p0
50,000
50 000
100
Construction - Restoration Project
Construction - Dime MaInt.
,
q a *'
i }d
•,•. , ° � �,
MOtntiottrlg
t k '
4sa,"k.,
,
Design (40ay/ t X 0,0008)
y i �,
;r } s 1 ^,
100,000
100 000
Permvft
VYIPYYWM,
Monitoring
, .t+: -
' �: M.; `.rl.:¢l;
1 •i 4 -
Soft UN" PO* ObAitko It
3841*74.15awftit
'; I
Design - Structure(s) & (10ey/R X ?,OW.)
PermMing
Construction
i
ya�
.� :.'a ..`r
1?•; 1' it .*�y:
Moreorhg
B it 0 •NAW 8raah P.oYOY 1No Aftn Rem" .. :
Note: Costs Based on - 50% Slate, 50°x6 Local Contribution
U
•
•
0
Table NoA, cont Long Range Beach Erosion Control Budget Program - Estimated Plan Costs
Prepared by: Indian River County - Public Works Deapartment - Coastal Engineering Division
Description
Federal
state
Local
. Total
Federal
state
Local
TOW :
Federal
State
Local
Toter'
Eiemerde
Beach Profiles
-
25,000
25,000
db,000
r,
Aerial Photography
15,000
15,000
3(1,000
_
Send Search investigation
'
Ecomordc Analysis - Beach Preservation District
Saotw 1- Feeder Beach ad R4 -R11
�
Design (80cy/ft X 7,0001111.) - maximum vokune allowed
Permitting
1'
Counbuction
MonUo
37,500
37,500
76 .0.0
25,000
25,000
A6,0�
25,000
25,000
60,
Sector 2 - Faader Eiaah Pio eot Rt 1•R11' ' 7'�' '
Design (40cy/ft X 6.000ft.)
-
Permitting
construction
MonOofig
37,500
37,500
;; • : • ' .78,000
25,000
25,000
.` ` Y' M.000
25,000
25,000
lid Oti0
Sedor 3, Beath Reeto o*m MAO s 0-M M
Design - 13ch.Res.(40ay/ft X 7,000111.) & Dune Matrd. (10cy/ft X 3,000ft.)
Penn"
construction - Restoration Project
1,344,000
1,344,000
2,080,000
construction - Dune Metnt.
144,000
144,000..;'1'280
,000
Monitoring50.000
50,000
100,1
50.000
58,000
30.000
30.000
60,000
Sector 4 - Nebritl Biaolr P o Ac6en
Bettor 6 - PEP d BeuOt Re�atlon set ti77-RBA
. .
Design (40cy/ft X 8,0001t.)
150,000
150,000
Permiftfig
37,500
37,500
76,000
,
construction
1.728,000
1,728,000
��456,000
Monitoring
50,000
50,00000
000
50,000
50.000
100,000
Sector tie Nsttitil Beach P (No Action Ro2!!d)
Seolar • Beach ReatoraOan PjNW 91 MR107 '
'.
Design - Structure(s) & (10cy/ft X 7.000h.)
25,000
25.000
60.000
100,000
100,000
..
-
Permwng
25,000
25,000
:. ' 60,000
Coraaruction
750,000
750,000
' 1,508,000
Mo O
50,000
50,000
'. - •100,0!10
Sector 8 - NaWrd Beach PAWNo Action ed)
rr r
r
TOTAL:
$ 1,825,500 1
$ 1,825,500 1
S 3,861,000
1i
2,043,000 1
$ 2,043,000 13
40000 1
$ 830,000 13
830,000 1
1A80,000
Note. Costs Based on - 50% State, 50% Local Contribution
iw-
00
r. -
C:) 0
�c
Table No.4, cont. Long Range Beach Erosion Control Budget Program - Estimated Plan Costs
Prepared bv: Indian River County - Public Works naanarlmant - Cnastal Frxrinaarinn nivininn
Note: Costs Based on - 50% State, 50% Local Contribution
0
FY03 04
0r
Description
Federal
State
Local
Total.
I Federal
State
Local
Toter
Total Cost
Cox"" Ehments
Beach ProlUes
25,000
25,000
80,000
50,000
50,000
100,000
300,000
Aerial Photography
15,000
15,000
30,000
30,000
30,000
80,000
150,000
Sand search Investigation
100,000
Ecomonic Analysis - Beach Preservation District
75,000
Sear 1- Feeder Beach FrOP '
Design (80cy/fl X 7,0MR.) - msrlmum volume allowed
100,000
Permitting
50,000
Construction
4,480,000
Monitoring
25,000
25,000
.. soma
125,000
125,000
000
575,000
t3ealor Z • F �gpch Prof Rt t_R17
Design (40cy/fl X 8,000ft.)
150,000
Pwfftftg
50,000
Construction
.
1,920,000
Monitoring
25,000
25,000
..; ,:10,000
125,000
125,000
250,000
575,000
Sector 3 - Satish Radiation R37 -R44 8, 01410e MRIML
Design - Bch.Res.(40cy/ft X 7,00011.) d Dune Mabd. (10cy/ft X 3,000ft.)
414,000
Permitting
-
125,000
Construction - Restoration Project
2,888,000
Construction - Dorm Mabd.
288,000
Monitoring
30,000
30,000
.:. 80 000
150,0001
150,000
300 Od0
820,000
lector 4 • NsJwW ft" Oaft rb AoO •
Stator 5 • pap a assah ReebhStpt Project R77-RpQ
500,000
Design (40ay/ft X 9,000R.)
Permitting
-
75,000
Construction
3,458,000
Monitoring
30,000
30,000
80,080
150,000
150,000
` .300,0001
580,000
Soft A - Wool Saudi Poky to Aa11mt R ed)
Sesta 7 - 9aach RestorOm Pro eot R100 -R107
Design - Structure(s) 6 (10cy/11 X 7,0008 )
250,000
Permitting
-
50,000
Construction
-
_
1,500,000
Monitoring
37,500
37,500
75.0"1
125,000
125,000
¢50,000
425,000
Sector 8 - NeWral Beads P No Action R ed)
r
rt r
TOTAL:
IS 187,500111
187,5001$_1?5,0061
IS
755,000 I
S 755,000
s 1,810,000
119,478,000
Note: Costs Based on - 50% State, 50% Local Contribution
0
_I
Director Davis stated that staff has tried to tailor the Plan for the present situation,
recognizing the preliminary work that has to be done such as hardbottom mapping. Sand
availability is also a big concern and sources will need to be located.
The Chairman opened the public hearing and asked if anyone wished to be heard
regarding this matter.
John Thompson, 12790 North AlA, Ambersand, stated that he has been here 25
years and felt there was some wonderful improvement from the work done last year. He
really would like to see the improvements continue.
Lutz J. Micheel,1985 Surfside Terrace, thanked Mr. Tabar for his presentation to the
South Beach Property Owners and wondered if some interested citizens could set up a time
to discuss some items with him.
others.
Mr. Tabar stated that staff would be more than happy to meet with Mr. Micheel and
Renee Renzi, Waverly Place, said she has read some intriguing "letters to the editor"
regarding a pocket beach at Humiston Park and wondered if anyone is seriously considering
that as an option.
Commissioner Adams noted that Humiston Park is a City of Vero Beach area.
Herndon Williams, 3554 Ocean Drive, wanted to know about the feasibility of
closing the Sebastian Inlet. He also questioned funding the Beach Plan after the first projects
are completed and felt that it will cost $20,000,000 every 9 years.
Commissioner Adams noted that closing the Sebastian Inlet has been discussed but
there has been no serious study done as to the economic impact of the Inlet on the County.
She felt that was not the answer to the problem.
Mr. Tabar noted that the costs are for the initial projects. Once the projects are
completed, the costs involved will be -for maintenance which is much less than the initiation
of the project.
MAY 59 1998
r:
Mr. Williams felt it might be worthwhile to look at closing the Inlet as he felt that is
the root of the problems.
Glenn Legwen, 5900 5' Street SW, was impressed with the proposed Plan and also
believed the major culprit to be the Sebastian Inlet. These inlets in Florida were created to
encourage trade before they understood the causes of erosion. He questioned why something
is not being done on a state-wide level to mitigate the problems being caused by all of the
inlets.
Mr. Legwen also questioned whether the Board was aware of the destruction of the
rainforest in Brazil and noted that it would be necessary to obtain the cooperation of Brevard
County in any attempt to close down the Sebastian Inlet.
Commissioner Adams emphasized that no serious thought has been given to closing
the Inlet as it provides great environmental benefits to the Indian River. The problem is the
sand which is interrupted by the Inlet, but closing the Inlet would create many other
problems. Also, that would be a legislative decision, and is beyond the Board's parameters.
Bill Glynn, 1802 Barefoot Place, President ofNorth Beach Association, congratulated
staff and thanked Commissioner Adams who is the Chairman of the Beach and Shore
Preservation Advisory Committee. Mr. Glynn felt they have all done an outstanding job and
urged the Board to support the Plan.
Penny Chandler, Executive Director of the Chamber of Commerce, stated she takes
her hat off to Jeff Tabar, Jim Davis and the Beach and Shore Preservation Advisory
Committee for presenting this reasonable and comprehensive Plan. She noted that the
Chamber is getting an increasing number of calls from tourists considering other areas
because of their concern about their ability to enjoy our beaches. She urged the Board to
support the Plan which she felt will affect every property owner and resident of the County.
Art Firtion, Commissioner of the Sebastian Inlet Taxing District, wanted to present
a case for taxpayers north of CR -5 10. He objected to "double taxing", believing that a tax
was being voted upon. He reminded the Board that the residents of the Inlet Taxing District
have been paying taxes in that area for a long time and would be double -taxed by a new
taxing district. He gave the PEP reef a grade "C-" and cautioned the Board not to jump into
anything.
MAY 59 1998
-67-
•
I
Commissioner Adams noted that the item under discussion has nothing to do with
taxes. The item does not address or attack Mr. Firtion's Inlet and the Board's responsibility
is to all of the County's taxpayers, not just to the Inlet's District. She emphasized that the
PEP reef is right on track and felt it was very shortsighted to grade it negatively.
Commissioner Ginn questioned why the Sebastian Inlet had not gone to a bypass
system which would have continually replaced the sand being lost.
Mr. Firtion responded that there has not been enough money in their budget but that
they expect more funds from the State this year which will give them an opportunity to
examine more options.
Commissioner Ginn then questioned whether Mr. Firtion was aware of the study done
on the Canaveral Inlet and noted that the Board will be looking at many sources of funding,
not just the taxpayers.
Joanna Dunlap, 13030 North AIA, a member of the North Beach Civic Association,
wondered if some of the members who arrived late could examine some of the data, and Mr.
Tabar responded that he would be happy to distribute more copies of the Plan and would
make himself available to speak to the Civic Association at their pleasure.
Commissioner Macht commented that the Plan does not fight Mother Nature but the
people who built the Inlet, the government which has dammed almost every river, depriving
the sand from erosion, and the deep plumbing of the aquifer along the coast. These works
of man are what needs to be mitigated and replacement of sand is the only solution which
has ever shown any improvement.
George Gross, 1230 39' Avenue, felt the problem is that no one has taken any action
between the 1988 and the 1998 Plan. During that time, the State changed the critical areas
from 6 to 8 miles. He wanted to see some action sooner than 4 or 5 years from now and
asked the Board to approve the Plan.
Michael Walther, 1725 361h Avenue, a coastal engineer, felt this is a very good plan
and encouraged the Board to embrace it.
MAY 59 1998
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams,
SECONDED by Commissioner Eggert, the Board
unanimously adopted the Beach Preservation Plan
Update Revised March 16 and April 7, 1998.
COPY OF BEACH PRESERVATION PLAN UPDATE
IS ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
There being no further business, on Motion duly made, seconded and carried, the
Board adjourned at 10:44 a.m.
ATTEST:
i=--
J. arton, Clerk J W. Tippin, C a' an
Minutes Approved: Y1 a (o1159
MAY 59 1998
,I n
-69- EOJK J ��1t