HomeMy WebLinkAbout5/19/1998+ MINUTES ATTACHED �
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
A G E N D A
May 19,1998
9:00 A.M. - COUNTY COMMISSION CHAMBER
County Administration Building
1840 25th Street, Vero Beach, Florida 32960
COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
John W. Tippin, Chairman (District 4) James E. Chandler, County Administrator
Kenneth R Macht, Vice Chairman (District 3)
Fran B. Adams (District 1) Charles P. Vitunac, County Attorney
Carolyn K. Eggert (District 2)
Caroline D. Ginn (District 5) Jeffrey K. Barton, Clerk to the Board
9:00 a.m. 1. CALL TO ORDER
2. EWOCATION Henry Burson, Jr.
Northside Church of God
3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE - Comm. Carolyn K. Eggert
4. ADDITIONS to the AGENDA/EMERGENCY ITEMS
5. PROCLAMATION and PRESENTATIONS
None
6. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Regular Meeting of April 28, 1998
7. CONSENT AGENDA
BACKUP
PAGES
A. Approval of Warrants
(memorandum dated May 7, 1998) 1-8
B. Payments to Vendors of Court Related Costs
(memorandum dated May 8, 1998) 9
C. Budget Adjustment - Sheriffs Office
(letter dated May 6, 1998) 10
BOOK I Ub F-nE 3
8. CONSTITUTIONAL OFFICERS and
GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES
None
9:05 A.M. 9. PUBLIC ITEMS
I
B.
C.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
Final Hearing on Proposed LDR Amendments
(Legislative)
(memorandum dated May 12, 1998)
PUBLIC DISCUSSION ITEMS
None
PUBLIC NOTICE ITEMS
1. Public Hearing Scheduled for May 26, 1998:
AN ORDINANCE OF INDIAN RIVER
COUNTY, FLORIDA, CHANGING THE
NAME OF THE "COLORED SCHOOL
SUBDIVISION" TO THE "DOUGLAS
SUBDIVISION"
(no backup provided)
2. Public Hearing Scheduled for June 2, 1998:
AN ORDINANCE OF INDIAN RIVER
COUNTY, FLORIDA, AMENDING CHAPTER
306 OF THE CODE, MISCELLANEOUS
OFFENSES AND PROGRAMS, BY ADOPT-
ING SECTION 306.12 "USE OF AIRBOATS
IN THE ST. SEBASTIAN RIVER"
(memorandum dated May 12, 1998)
10. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S MATTERS
Teamsters Contract
(memorandum dated May 8, 1998)
11. DEPARTMENTAL MATTERS
A. Communfty Development
None
B. Emergency Services
BACKUP
PAGES
11-102
103-106
107-141
Contractual Services Agreement No. 98 -LM -
4H -1040-01-031 Between the Fla. Dept. of
Community Affairs and Indian River County
to Develop a Local Mitigation Strategy
(memorandum dated May 11, 1998) 142-181
C. General Services
None
D. Leisure Services
None
E. Office of Management and Budget
None
•
11. DEPARTMENTAL MATTERS (cont'd.):
F. Personnel
None
G. Public Works
Engineering Consultant Selection - Indian River
Stormwater Improvements
(memorandum dated May 11, 1998)
H. Utilities
1. West Meadows Subdivision, Water Assess-
ment Project, Final Payment Request
(memorandum dated May 11, 1998)
2. Laurelwood Wastewater Treatment Plant
Demolition
(memorandum dated May 11, 1998)
3. Park Place Construction Finalization Com-
mitment By County, Proposed Developer's
Agreement Between William Schulke and
Indian River County
(memorandum dated May 11, 1998)
4. Petition for Water Service - 129th St
Final Pay Request and Change Order
(memorandum dated May 11, 1998)
12. COUNTY ATTORNEY
None
13.
A. Chairman John W. Tippin
B. Vice Chairman Kenneth R. Macht
Comments on Proposed Lost Tree Island Purchase
(no backup provided)
C. Commissioner Fran B. Adams
D. Commissioner Carolyn K. Eggert
•
BACKUP
PAGES
182-183
184-189
190-193
194-215
216-235
WuIj F�a�F.i�Siti�
BACKUP
13. COMMISSIONERS ITEMS (cont'd Z PAGES
E. Commissioner Caroline D. Ginn
14. SPECIAL DISTRICTS/BOARDS
A. Emergency Services District
None
B. Solid Waste Disposal District
None
C. Environmental Control Board
. None
15. ADJOURNMENT
Anyone who may wish to appeal any decision which may be made at this meeting will need
to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made which includes the testimony and
evidence upon which the appeal will be based.
Anyone who needs a special accommodation for this meeting may contact the county's
Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) coordinator at 567-8000 x408 at least 48 hours in advance
c)f meeting.
Meeting may be broadcast live on TCI Cable Channel 13 - rebroadcast various times
throughout the week
Falcon Cable Channel 35 - rebroadcast Friday evening
INDEX TO MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING
OF BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
MAY 19, 1998
1. CALL TO ORDER ............................................... 1-
2. INVOCATION .................................................. 1-
3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ....................................... 1-
6. APPROVAL OF MINUTES ....................................... -1-
7. CONSENT AGENDA ........................................... -1-
7.A. Approval of Warrants ....................................... 2-
7.B. Payments to Vendors of Court -Related Costs ..................... 7-
7.C. Sheriff- Budget Adjustment - Broward County Inmates and Immigration
and Naturalization Services Revenues ........................... 8-
9.A. PUBLIC HEARINGS - FINAL HEARING ON LAND DEVELOPMENT
REGULATION (LDR) AMENDMENTS ............................. .9-
1. Extending the Incidental to Development Mining Exemption (filed by Bent
Pine Golf Club, Inc./Bruce Barkett, Attorney) ................... .11-
2. Bed and Breakfast Uses (filed by Mr. and Mrs. Redstone/John Dean,
Architect) ............................................... .11-
3. Sign Regulations (Staff Initiated) ............................. .12-
4. Mini -Storage Parking Requirements (Staff Initiated) .............. .12-
5. Affordable Housing Changes to Match New Comprehensive Plan Policies
(Staff Initiated) .......................................... .12-
6. Household Pet Definition and Non -Commercial Kennels (Staff and
Planning and Zoning Commission Initiated) ........... ......... .13-
7. Mailed Notice Requirements: Regular Mail vs. Certified Mail (Staff
Initiated) ............................................... .13 -
MAY 199 1998
l b, fr16c- bq I
L lob f ri � C _,�> �, a.� I
�"5461
8. Recreational Vehicle Park Occupancy Time Period and Allowance for
Attaching Carports and Porches, And Setbacks (Sunshine Travel
Park/Bruce Barkett, Attorney) ............................... .13-
9. LDR Amendments: Relationship Between Zoning Districts and Land Use
Designations ............................................ .14-
10. LDR Amendment: Codification and Modification of SR -60 Corridor Plan
Requirements ........................................... .14-
9.C.1. PUBLIC NOTICE ITEMS - PUBLIC HEARING SCHEDULED FOR MAY 26,
1998: AN ORDINANCE OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA,
CHANGING THE NAME OF THE "COLORED SCHOOL SUBDIVISION" TO
THE "DOUGLAS SUBDIVISION".................................65-
9.C.2. PUBLIC NOTICE ITEMS - PUBLIC HEARING SCHEDULED FOR JUNE 23,
1998: AN ORDINANCE OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA,
AMENDING CHAPTER 306 OF THE CODE, MISCELLANEOUS OFFENSES
AND PROGRAMS, BY ADOPTING SECTION 306.12 "USE OF AIRBOATS IN
THE ST. SEBASTIAN RIVER"....................................65-
10. TEAMSTERS LOCAL UNION NO. 769 CONTRACT (BLUE COLLAR
WORKERS - ROAD & BRIDGE, PARKS, BUILDING & GROUNDS AND
UTILITY DEPARTMENTS) ...................................... .66-
I LB. DEVELOPMENT OF A LOCAL MITIGATION STRATEGY - CONTRACTUAL
SERVICES AGREEMENT NO. 98 -LM -4H-1040-01-031- FLORIDA
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS (DCA) .... , ...........67-
11.G. INDIAN RIVER STORMWATER IMPROVEMENTS - ENGINEERING
CONSULTANT SELECTION - CARTER & ASSOCIATES ............ -69-
11.H.1. WEST MEADOWS SUBDIVISION - WATER ASSESSMENT PROJECT
- FINAL PAYMENT REQUEST - TREASURE COAST CONTRACTING
...................................................... .70 -
MAY 19, 1998
11.H.2. LAURELWOOD WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT DEMOLITION
- II1MMINS CONTRACTING CORP . ........................ .71-
11.H.3. PARK PLACE CONSTRUCTION FINALIZATION COMMITMENT -
PROPOSED DEVELOPER'S AGREEMENT - WILLIAM SCHULKE -
HYATT PROPERTY - BARBER STREET TRADE CENTER
SUBDIVISION .......................................... .72-
11.H.4. 129TH STREET PETITION WATER SERVICE - FINAL PAY REQUEST
AND CHANGE ORDER - TREASURE COAST CONTRACTING .. -74-
13.B. VICE CHAIRMAN MACHT - LOST TREE ISLAND (LAAC -
ENVIRONMENTAL LAND) PURCHASE - COMMENTS ............. .75 -
MAY 19, 1998
-3- [:fit Y P 0 j F,9GE i t
•
May 19, 1998
REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS
The Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida, met in Regular
Session at the County Commission Chambers, 1840 25' Street, Vero Beach, Florida, on
Tuesday, May 19, 1998, at 9:00 a.m. Present were John W. Tippin, Chairman; Kenneth R
Macht, Vice Chairman; Fran B. Adams; Carolyn K. Eggert; and Caroline D. Ginn. Also
present were James E. Chandler, County Administrator; Charles P. Vitunac, County
Attorney; and Patricia "PT' Jones, Deputy Clerk.
1. CALL TO ORDER
Chairman Tippin called the meeting to order.
2. INVOCATION
Commissioner Ginn delivered the Invocation.
3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Commissioner Eggert led the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag.
6. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
The Chairman asked if there were any corrections or additions to the Minutes of the
Regular Meeting of April 28, 1998. There were none.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert,
SECONDED by Commissioner Ginn, the Board
unanimously approved the Minutes of the Regular
Meeting of April 28, 1998, as written.
MAY 199 1998
-IU 5 F'� G C- ;" J t' �; , " -7
JL
7. CONSENT AGENDA
7.A. APPROVAL OF WARRANTS
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of May 7, 1998:
TO: HONORABLE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
DATE: MAY 7. 1998
SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF WARRANTS
FROM: EDWIN M. FRY, JR., FINANCE DIRECTOR
In compliance with Chapter 136.06. Florida Statutes, all warrants issued
by the Board of County Commissioners are to be recorded in the Board minutes.
Approval is requested for the attached list of warrants, issued by the Clerk
to the Board, for the time period of May 6 to May 7, 1998.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert,
SECONDED by Commissioner Ginn, the Board
unanimously approved the list of Warrants as issued
by the Clerk to the Board for the period from May 6,
1998 through May 7,- 1998, as recommended by
staff.
CHECK
NAME
CHECK
CHECK
NUMEER
DATE
AMOUNT
0019384
FLORIDA COMBINED LIFE
5/06/98
1,992.84
0019385
AETNA LIFE INSURANCE AND
5/06/98
934.11
0019386
FLORIDA RETIREMENT SYSTEM
5/06/98
336,258.53
0019387
TRANS GENERAL LIFE INSURANCE
5/06/98
3,039.90
0019388
IRC EMPLOYEE HEALTH INSURANCE_
5/06/98
6,500.00
0241738
A A FIRE EQUIPMENT, INC
5/07/98
48.00
0241739
ACE PLUMBING, INC
5/07/98
45.00
0241740
ACTION TRANSMISSION AND
5/07/98
176.50
0241741
ADVANCED GARAGE DOORS, INC
5/07/98
55.00
0241742
AERO PRODUCTS CORPORATION
5/07/98
1,949.43
0241743
A G L L
5/07/98
89.70
0241744
ALPHA ACE HARDWARE
5/07/98
25.24
0241745
AMERICAN PROBATION & PAROLE
5/07/98
35.00
0241746
ACTION ANSWERING SERVICE
5/07/98
367.20
0241747
APPLE INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY CO
5/07/98
63.42
0241748
APPLE MACHINE & SUPPLY CO
5/07/98
247.58
0241749
AT YOUR SERVICE
5/07/98
1,911.20
0241750
ATCO TOOL SUPPLY
5/07/98
10.67
0241751
A W W A
5/07/98
200.00
0241752
A B S PUMPS, INC
5/07/98
1,622.41
0241753
ALL FLORIDA COFFEE & BOTTLED
5/07/98
0241754
A A ELECTRIC, INC
5/07/98
59.90
234.69
MAY 199 1998
-2-
0
MAY 199 1998
-3- ju
CHECK
NAME
CHECK
CHECK
NUMBER
DATE
AMOUNT
0241755
ADAMS, FRAN B
5/07/98
363.47
0241756
A T & T
5/07/98
35.18
0241757
ATLANTIC COASTAL TITLE CORP
5/07/98
67.00
0241758
AMERICAN REPORTING
5/07/98
44.70
0241759
ARCH PAGING
5/07/98
484.60
0241760
ALTERATIONS
5/07/98
26.00
0241761
BAKER DISTRIBUTING CO
5/07/98
136.92
0241762
BARTH CONSTRUCTION
5/07/98
500.00
0241763
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
5/07/98
3,811.48
0241764
BENSONS LOCK SERVICE
5/07/98
29.25
0241765
BELLSOUTH MOBILITY
5/07/98
74.21
0241766
BARTON, JEFFREY K -CLERK
5/07/98
4,937.00
0241767
BERGGREN EQUIPMENT CO, INC
5/07/98
1,296.77
0241768
B & B INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY CO.
5/07/98
1,391.74
0241769
BRODART CO
5/07/98
683.99
0241770
BONET, JAMES RN
5/07/98
80.00
0241771
BAKER & TAYLOR
5/07/98
4.20
0241772
BOYNTON PUMP & IRRIGATION
5/07/98
61.35
0241773
B & J LOCKSMITH, INC
5/07/98
84.00
0241774
BOYD PUBLISHING COMPANY
5/07/98
71.25
0241775
BEVERAGE STOP, THE
5/07/98
70.00
0241776
BLOOMINGSURG, OTTO
5/07/98
13.63
0241777
BELLSOUTH
5/07/98
792.05
0241778
BIOCYCLE
5/07/98
69.00
0241779
BLUE CROSS/BLUE SHIELD OF
5/07/98
17,138.00
0241780
BELLSOUTH PUBLIC COMMUNICATION
5/07/98
29.88
0241781
BAKER & TAYLOR INC
5/07/98
488.81
0241782
BMG
5/07/98
109.58
0241783
BARTON, JEFFREY K
5/07/98
302.63
0241784
BAUMGARDNER, MELINDA
5/07/98
150.12
0241785
BAY REPORTING SERVICE INC
5/07/98
180.50
0241786
BURKE, DONNIE
5/07/98
72.10
0241787
BELL, MICHAEL D MD
5/07/98
50.00
0241788
BELFORD, DENNIS
5/07/98
12.76
0241789
BEL -REGIONAL HOME MED, INC
5/07/98
33.82
0241790
BALLESTER, ANTONIO
5/07/98
131.33
0241791
CARTER ASSOCIATES, INC
5/07/98
2,290.00
0241792
CHANDLER EQUIPMENT CO, INC
5/07/98
625.42
0241793
CLEMENT COMMUNICATIONS, INC
5/07/98
442.00
0241794
COLD AIR DISTRIBUTORS
5/07/98
210.98
0241795
COMMUNICATIONS INT'L INC
5/07/98
4,367.96
0241796
CORBIN, SHIRLEY E
5/07/98
178.50
0241797
COPELAND, LINDA
5/07/98
136.50
0241798
CARDINAL ROOFING & SIDING, INC
5/07/98
11,280.00
0241799
CHILDREN'S SERVICE COUNCIL OF
5/07/98
50.00
0241800
COOK, TERRY
5/07/98
226.52
0241801
CRITIC'S CHOICE VIDEO
5/07/98
26.90
0241802
CLIFFORD, MIKE
5/07/98
100.00
0241803
CHAMPION MANUFACTURING INC
5/07/98
582.44
0241804
CORPORATION OF THE PRESIDENT
5/07/98
136.50
0241805
C E I
5/07/98
309.54
0241806
CRAWFORD & COMPANY
5/07/98
956.14
0241807
CENTRAL PUMP & SUPPLY INC
5/07/98
774.42
0241808
C D W COMPUTERS INC
5/07/98
128.11
0241809
CUMMINS, CHERYL
5/07/98
12.00
0241810
CONSULTANT PUBLICATIONS
5/07/98
28.50
0241811
CLARKE, JENNIE M
5/07/98
300.00
0241812
CENTRAL AIR CONDITIONING &
5/07/98
145.21
0241813
DAILY COURIER SERVICE
5/07/98
304.50
0241814
DELTA SUPPLY CO
5/07/98
119.27
0241815
DEMCO INC
5/07/98
212.20
0241816
DEPENDABLE DODGE, INC
5/07/98
156.38
0241817
DICKERSON-FLORIDA, INC
5/07/98
502,018.22
0241818
DIRECTOR, KENNETH L MD PA
5/07/98
225.00
0241819
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS
5/07/98
271.92
0241820
DOCTOR'S CLINIC
5/07/98
841.37
0241821
DATA SUPPLIES, INC
5/07/98
3,936.83
0241822
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF
5/07/98
5,000.00
0241823
DRIVEWAYS INC
5/07/98
13,335.36
0241824
DEAF SERVICE CENTER OF THE
5/07/98
416.67
0241825
DUNRELBERGER ENGINEERING &
5/07/98
5,490.21
0241826
DOWNTOWN PRODUCE INC
5/07/98
239.39
0241827
DILLARD, CASBIE
5/07/98
33.48
0241828
DOCTORS' CLINIC
5/07/98
409.88
0241829
DOCKSIDE BUILDERS OF
5/07/98
1,800.00
0241830
DOOR COUNTY YMCA
5/07/98
311.00
0241831
E -Z BREW COFFEE SERVICE, INC
5/07/98
12.50
0241832
ENVIROMETRICS, INC
5/07/98
8,780.50
0241833
EVANS, FLOYD
5/07/98
50.00
0241834
EBSCO SUBSCRIPTION SERVICES
5/07/98
21,398.75
MAY 199 1998
-3- ju
Fr_
MON .aU 5 Fr1Cc e
CHECK NAME
CHECK
CHECK
NUMBER
DATE
AMOUNT
0241835 EMERGENCY MEDICINE ASSOCIATES
5/07/98
29.00
0241836 ELPEX, INC
5/07/98
3,039.50
0241837 EMERGENCY LINEN SUPPLY CO
5/07/98
1,146.60
0241838 ERICSSON, INC
5/07/98
142.33
0241839 ECOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC
5/07/98
14,415.02
0241840 FIRST AMENDMENT FOUNDATION
5/07/98
12.95
0241841 FLORIDA COOPERATIVE EXTENSION
5/07/98
5,778.50
0241842 FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF
5/07/98
6,500.00
0241843 FLORIDA EAST COAST RAILWAY CO
5/07/98
1,964.22
0241844 FLORIDA ASSOCIATION OF
5/07/98
380.00
0241845 FLORIDA COCA-COLA BOTTLING CO
5/07/98
566.85
0241846 FLORIDA COURT REPORTERS
5/07/98
50.00
0241847 FLORIDA MARINE PATROL
5/07/98
25.00
0241848 FPL
5/07/98
4,622.89
0241849 FLORIDA SLUDGE, INC
5/07/98
8,190.00
0241850 FLOWERS BAKING COMPANY OF
5/07/98
314.18
0241851 FLORIDA TIRE RECYCLING, INC
5/07/98
743.40
0241852 FLORIDA FUNDING PUBLICATIONS
5/07/98
84.00
0241853 FLORIDA ASSOCIATION OF
5/07/98
20.00
0241854 FALZONE, KATHY
5/07/98
288,73
0241855 FALZONE, MATTHEW
5/07/98
51.50
0241856 FLORIDAFFINITY, INC
5/07/98
6,536.70
0241857 FALZONE, CHRISTOPHER
5/07/98
36.05
0241858 FOOT & ANKLE ASSOC OF FLORIDA
5/07/98
18.70
0241859 FLORIDA ASSOCIATION OF SOIL &
5/07/98
500.00
0241860 F & W PUBLICATIONS INC
5/07/98
39,22
0241861 FRANK LIMPACH ASSOCIATES
5/07/98
311.25
0241862 GATOR LUMBER COMPANY
5/07/98
1,535.22
0241863 GAYLORD BROTHERS, INC
5/07/98
231.32
0241864 GENEALOGICAL PUBLISHING
5/07/98
204.80
0241865 GLIDDEN COMPANY, THE
5/07/98
64.75
0241866 GENERAL MEDICAL CORP
5/07/98
427.28
0241867 GALE RESEARCH, INC
5/07/98
438.46
0241868 GOVERNOR'S HURRICANE
5/07/98
85.00
0241869 GEAC COMPUTERS, INC
5/07/98
5,626.26
0241870 GASBOY INTERNATIONAL, INC
5/07/98
250.00
0241871 GOLD STAR OF THE TREASURE
5/07/98
1,860.00
0241872 GRILL REFILL, INC
5/07/98
100.00
0241873 GENEALOGICAL CENTER,INC
5/07/98
170.00
0241874 GRAMLICH, GARY
5/07/98
385.00
0241875 GOVERNMENT BENEFIT SPECIALISTS
5/07/98
250.00
0241876 GULF INDUSTRIES INC
5/07/98
8,724.00
0241877 HARRIS SANITATION, INC
5/07/98
439.34
0241878 HIGHSMITH, INC
5/07/98
209.95
0241879 HILL DONNELLY CORPORATION
5/07/98
138.12
0241880 HUNTER AUTO SUPPLIES
5/07/98
868.03
0241881 HERITAGE BOOKS, INC
5/07/98
337.00
0241882 HELD, PATRICIA BARGO
5/07/98
42.00
0241883 HACH COMPANY
5/07/98
920.47
0241884 HATFIELD, STANLEY
5/07/98
54.81
0241885 HATFIELD, ERIC
5/07/98
134.38
0241886 HTE INC
5/07/98
0241887 HATHERLEIGH COMPANY, LTD
5/07/98
1,750.00
0241888 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY99.00
5/07/98
0241889 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
272,173.54
0241890 INDIAN RIVER BATTERY INC
5/07/98
75.00
02418915/07/98
INDIAN RIVER BLUE PRINT, INC
5/07/98
1,873.Si
0241892 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY UTILITY
5/07/98
287.56
0241893 INGRAM
1,849.56
0241894 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
5/07/98
2,103.64
0241895 INFILCO DEGREMONT INC
5/07/98
334.00
0241896 INDIAN RIVER MEMORIAL HOSPITAL
5/07/98
542.32
0241897 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY436.31
5/07/98
0241898 IBM CORP-DVV
5/07/98
2,702.00
0241899 INDIAN RIVER ALL-FAB,INC
5/07/98
5/07/98
333.50
0241900 INDIAN RIVER CLUB
5/07/98
822.29
0241901 IRC EMPLOYEE HEALTH INSURANCE-
5/07/98
35,411.00
0241902 IKON OFFICE SOLUTIONS
205,047.37
0241903 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY SHERIFF'S
258.71
0241904 INTERNATIONAL PALM SOCIETy,INC
5/07/98
25.00
0241905 INDIAN RIVER MUD40.00
5/07/98
0241906 JACKSON ELECTRONICS
5/07/98
110.91
0241907 J R REPORTING ASSOCIATES, INC
5/07/98
15.51
0241908 JEWETT ORTHOPAEDIC CLINIC
5/07/98
58.00
0241909 JARA, INC
5/07/98
36.00
0241910 JONES CHEMICALS, INC
5/07/98
5/07/98
431.00
0241911 KIMLEY_HORN & ASSOCIATES, INC
5/07/98
5,220.00
0241912 KING, JOHN W
1,953.36
0241913 POWELL, MARY D
5/07/98
76.18
0241914 KNIGHT & MATHIS, INC
5/07/98
5/07/98
141.91
0241915 KEY, PATRICIA W
5/07/98
606.68
0241916 KIRBY AUTO SUPPLY FT PIERCE
161.00
0241917 XT MOWER & EQUIPMENT
5/07/98
849.37
5/07/98
30.38
MAY 199 1998
I
MAY 19,1998
CHECK
NAME
CHECK
CHECK
NUMBER
DATE
AMOUNT
0241918
KAPLAN, KAREN DC
5/07/98
304.20
0241919
KELLY, JULIE ANN
5/07/98
173.25
0241920
LATTER RAIN INC
5/07/98
45.00
0241921
LEAHY MICROGRAPHICS, INC
5/07/98
2,780.61
0241922
L I TREE SERVICE, INC
5/07/98
250.00
0241923
LEISURE ARTS, INC
5/07/98
48.90
0241924
LEWIS, RUTH A
5/07/98
45.88
0241925
L B SMITH, INC
5/07/98
933.42
0241926
LIBRARIES UNLIMITED, INC
5/07/98
95.60
0241927
LEKNISKAS, SHANNON
5/07/98
38.63
0241928
LOCKSMITH LEDGER CORP
5/07/98
38.00
0241929
LESCO, INC
5/07/98
267.93
0241930
LEGAL VIEW, INC
5/07/98
44.00
0241931
LEXOW, CLAUSSON P, AS TRUSTEE
5/07/98
10,380.90
0241932
M D MOODY & SONS, INC
5/07/98
152.98
0241933
MACMILLAN OIL COMPANY
5/07/98
190.73
0241934
MAXWELL PLUMBING, INC
5/07/98
375.36
0241935
MCCORKLE RADIOLOGY
5/07/98
122.00
0241936
MID COAST TIRE SERVICE, INC
5/07/98
60.00
0241937
MORA, RALPH PHD
5/07/98
400.00
0241938
MATRX MEDICAL, INC
5/07/98
1,224.50
0241939
MICRO WAREHOUSE
5/07/98
284.70
0241940
MICRO -SCILLA
5/07/98
240.00
0241941
MELBOURNE )mmROLOGIC, PA
5/07/98
241.00
0241942
MANTZ ELECTRIC
5/07/98
1,494.86
0241943
M & R RECYCLING SYSTEMS &
5/07/98
1,295.19
0241944
-MORNINGSTAR, INC
5/07/98
35.00
0241945
MIDWEST TAPE EXCHANGE
5/07/98
52.85
0241946
MR BOB PORTABLE TOILET
5/07/98
421.80
0241947
MAIN STREET HARDWARE, INC
5/07/98
7.57
0241948
MELCHIORI, NICK
5/07/98
64.38
0241949
MGB CONSTRUCTION INC
5/07/98
1,000.00
0241950
MATTHEWS, CARLA S
5/07/98
300.00
0241951
NATIONWIDE ADVERTISING
5/07/98
228.99
0241952
NORTH SOUTH SUPPLY
5/07/98
118.63
0241953
NEW HORIZONS OF THE TREASURE
5/07/98
2,505.31
0241954
NATIONAL VETERANS LEGAL
5/07/98
18.50
0241955
NOCUTS, INC
5/07/98
197.00
0241956
NEVOR, NICK
5/07/98
72.10
0241957
OSCEOLA MEDICAL SUPPLY
5/07/98
87.95
0241958
OXFORD UNIVERSITY PRESS
5/07/98
94.16
0241959
OFFICE MAX
5/07/98
1,215.00
0241960
O'NEIL, LEE & WEST
5/07/98
19,841.13
0241961
OMNI HEALTH CARE
5/07/98
636.00
0241962
PARKS RENTAL INC
5/07/98
77.78
0241963
PETTY CASH
5/07/98
64.47
0241964
PETTY CASH
5/07/98
152.59
0241965
PETTY CASH
5/07/98
420.68
0241966
PETRILLA, FRED J JR PHD
5/07/98
10,430.00
0241967
PAVCO CONSTRUCTION, INC
5/07/98
4,735.79
0241968
PORT PETROLEUM, INC
5/07/98
639.64
0241969
PRESTON, SIGLINDE
5/07/98
6.00
0241970
PRESS JOURNAL
5/07/98
106.00
0241971
POSTMASTER
5/07/98
128.00
0241972
PIERONE, GERALD JR, MD
5/07/98
11919.00
0241973
PARAGON HOME BUILDERS
5/07/98
500.00
0241974
PROFESSIONAL CASE MANAGEMENT
5/07/98
147.00
0241975
PROMEDIXDUCTS CORP
5/07/98
1,219.60
0241976
RELIABLE SEPTIC AND SERVICES
5/07/98
450.00
0241977
ROBINSON EQUIPMENT COMPANY,INC
5/07/98
234.01
0241978
ROBERTS & REYNOLDS PA
5/07/98
733.54
0241979
REDSTONE, MICHAEL
5/07/98
62.65
0241980
ROY CLARK
5/07/98
875.00
0241981
RIA GROUP
5/07/98
269.06
0241982
RENTAL 1
5/07/98
46.00
0241983
RSR WHOLESALE SOUTH, INC
5/07/98
7,875.91
0241984
SAFETY KLEEN CORP
5/07/98
108.00
0241985
SCOTT'S SPORTING GOODS
5/07/98
1,666.40
0241986
SCOTTY'S, INC
5/07/98
675.27
0241987
SEBASTIAN BUSINESS SUPPLY, INC
5/07/98
72,00
0241988
SHELL OIL COMPANY
5/07/98
0241989
SOUTHERN BUILDING CODE
5/07/98
13.28
0241990
SAFESPACE, INC
5/07/98
100.00
0241991
SUNSHINE PHYSICAL THERAPY
5/07/98
1,250.00
0241992
SIMON & SCHUSTER
5/07/98
150.00
0241993
SHERWOOD, FRANCES G
1,022.18
0241994
STEWART TITLE OF INDIAN RIVER
5/07/98
135.00
0241995
SOUTHERN SEWER EQUIPMENT SALES
5/07/98
15,000.00
0241996
SUBSTANCE ABUSE COUNCIL
5/07/98
159.00
0241997 SF COMMUNICATIONS INC
150.00
0241998 SUN BELT MEDICAL SUPPLY, INC
5/07/98
138.90
0241999 SHELDON, JAMES
5/07/98
1,525.41
959.75
MAY 19,1998
CHECK
NAME
CHECK
CHECK
NUMBER
DATE
AMOUNT
0242000
SUPERIOR PRINTING
5/07/98
678.45
0242001
SEBASTIAN POLICE DEPARTMENT
5/07/98
25.00
0242002
SYNERGY BUILDERS
5/07/98
500.00
0242003
ST LUCIE COUNTY
5/07/98
1,850.00
0242004
STEWART, NALL, EVANS & HAFNER
5/07/98
15,000.00
0242005
SUDDEN IMAGES
5/07/98
117.00
0242006
SOUTHERN SECURITY SYSTEMS OF
5/07/98
743.00
0242007
SMITHKLINE BEECH
5/07/98
212.00
0242008
S L R PROPERTIES, INC
5/07/98
265.00
0242009
SHEPARDS
5/07/98
550.18
0242010
SOUL SEARCH
5/07/98
12.50
0242011
SAUCEDO-TRAPERO MD, ROBERT
5/07/98
114.00
0242012
SEIFER, RONALD MD
5/07/98
154.00
0242013
SPRAY -TECH INC/SEARS
5/07/98
40.00
0242014
TEN -8 FIRE EQUIPMENT, INC
5/07/98
46,993.95
0242015
TRIBUNE, THE
5/07/98
218.40
0242016
TRODGLEN PAVING, INC
5/07/98
300.00
0242017
TURNER INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY CO
5/07/98
51.36
0242018
TREASURE COAST REFUSE CORP
5/07/98
70.97
0242019
TREASURE COAST CONTRACTING,INC
5/07/98
47,500.58
0242020
TIPPIN, JOHN W
5/07/98
163.37
0242021
TRANSTAT EQUIPMENT INC
5/07/98
156.90
0242022
TREASURE COAST POSTAL CUSTOMER
5/07/98
10.00
0242023
TCI MEDIA SERVICES
5/07/98
100.00
0242024
TRANS -GENERAL LIFE INSURANCE
5/07/98
5,614.54
0242025
TRUGREEN CHEMLAWN
5/07/98
20.00
0242026
TREASURE COAST BUILDERS INC
5/07/98
500.00
0242027
US FILTER DISTRIBUTION GROUP
5/07/98
11,779.60
0242028
USA BLUEBOOK
5/07/98
347.26
0242029
URBAN BUILDING SYSTEMS, INC
5/07/98
500.00
0242030
VELDE FORD, INC
5/07/98
826.23
0242031
VERO BEACH, CITY OF
5/07/98
9,532.33
0242032
VERO CHEMICAL DISTRIBUTORS,INC
5/07/98
31.75
0242033
VERO MARINE CENTER, INC
5/07/98
14,233.00
0242034
VERO BEACH POLICE DEPARTMENT
5/07/98
50.00
0242035
VERO BEARING & BOLT
5/07/98
319.59
0242036
VOLUNTEER ACTION CENTER
5/07/98
25.00
0242037
VIDEO LANE
5/07/98
75.00
0242038
WADSWORTH, DENNIS
5/07/98
3.10
0242039
WAKEFIELD, JUDITH A
5/07/98
143.18
0242040
WAL-MART STORES, INC
5/07/98
51.94
0242041
WALSH, LYNN
5/07/98
32.48
0242042
WATER ENVIRONMENT FEDERATION
5/07/98
75.25
0242043
WEST PUBLISHING PAYMENT CTR
5/07/98
549.73
0242044
WILSON'S PETROLEUM EQUIPMENT,
5/07/98
1,754.64
0242045
WOLSTENHOLME, SHIRLEY
5/07/98
33.76
0242046
W W GRAINGER, INC
5/07/98
116.76
0242047
WINN DI%IE STORES, INC
5/07/98
307.16
0242048
WAL-MART PHARMACY, INC
5/07/98
244.93
0242049
WORLD BOOK EDUCATIONAL PRODUCT
5/07/98
130.00
0242050
WILLIAM THIES & SONS, INC
5/07/98
349.70
0242051
WILLIAMS, BETTY R. RN
5/07/98
254.00
0242052
WYNDHAM HARBOUR ISLAND HOTEL
5/07/98
1,068.00
0242053
WOLFE, MEGAN
5/07/98
30.90
0242054
WSCF-FM
5/07/98
300.00
0242055
WALGREENS PHARMACY
5/07/98
179.49
0242056
WRAP N' SHIP
5/07/98
83.14
0242057
WEST GROUP PAYMENT CTR
5/07/98
1,014.10
0242058
WAL-MART STORES, INC
5/07/98
866.59
0242059
WOLFE, ERIN
5/07/98
30.90
0242060
XEROX CORPORATION
5/07/98
528.96
0242061
ZIMMERMANN, KARL
5/07/98
50.85
0242062
ZEPHYRHILLS NATURAL SPRING
5/07/98
9.50
0242063
RODDENBERRY, ALFRED
5/07/98
381.54
0242064
KEMP, HAROLD
5/07/98
308.92
0242065
WARD JR, CHARLES
5/07/98
249.92
0242066
ELKINS, HOLLY
5/07/98
888.39
1,865,882.81
MAY 199 1998
0
7.B. PAYMENTS TO VENDORS OF COURT -RELATED COSTS
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of May 8, 1998:
TO: Board of County Commissioners
FROM: Terrence P. O'Brien, Assistant County Attomeyop
DATE: May 8, 1998
SUBJECT: Payments to Vendors of Court Related Costs
The Office of the County Attorney has processed and approved payment to the following vendors
for the week of May 4, 1998. Listed below are the vendors names and the amount of each court
related costs.
Fred J. Petrilla
Expert Witness
9,930.00
Celeste Hartsfield
Transcription
157.50
Medical Record Services, Inc.
Research Records
25.55
Peggy Gollnick
Transcription
28.00
Patricia W. Key
Transcription
38.50
C. Jonathan Ahr, Ph.D.
Clinical Evaluation
500.00
Sheila I. Flinn
Transcription
52.50
Peggy Gollnick
Transcription
14.00
Peggy Gollnick
Transcription
63.00
Linda Copeland
Transcription
854.00
Barbara G.Schopp
Transcription
66.50
Sheila I. Flinn
Transcription
171.50
Sheila I. Flinn
Transcription
49.00
James T. Long, Esq.
Court Reporter
50.00
Reimbursement
Floyd Evans
Court Interpreter
100.00
Ralph Mora, Ph.D.
Clinical Evaluation
500.00
J. R. Reporting Associates
Transcription
500.00
J. R. Reporting Associates
Transcription
217.50
Sheldon H. Rifkin, Ph.D.
Clinical Evaluation
500.00
Robert J. Brugnoli, Ph.D.
Clinical Evaluation
500.00
C. Jonathan Ahr, Ph.D.
Clinical Evaluation
500.00
Federal Express
Overnight Mail
18.75
Sheldon H. Rifkin, Ph.D.
Clinical Evaluation
500.00
Florida Department of State
Records Research
20.00
Peggy Gollnick
Transcription
70.00
Russo Printing
Color Copies
10.52
Total
15,436.82
No action required or taken.
MAY 199 1998
-7- EO' �Uj FACc,1
I
11 I FACE'
7. G SHERIFF - BUDGET ADJUSTMENT - BROWARD COUNTYINMATES AND
IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICES REVENUES
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of May 6, 1998:
�ryeriff
4055 41st AVENUE
May 6. 1998
GARY C. WHEELER @ INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
VERO BEACH. FLORIDA 32960.1808
— " PHONE (561) 569-6700
WSTRIB TION LIST)
Commissioners _
The Honorable John Tippin. Chairman Administrator
Board of County Commissioners Attorney
Persxnnei
Indian River County public Works
1840 25th Street RECEIVED Community Dev.
Vero Beach, FL 32960-3394 Utilities
MAY 0 6 1998 Finance
Re: Budget Adjustment OMB
BOARD OF COUNTY Emerg. Sere
Dear Mr. Tippin: COMMISSION Risk Mgt.
Other
This letter is'a request to amend our fiscal year 1997-98 Operating Budget by $29.285. These funds
represent the revenue generated from the housing of Broward County inmates for the month of April.
1998, ($27,665) and from the housing of Immigration and Naturalization Services (I.N.S.) inmates for
the months of March and April. 1998. ($1,620). The monies will replace Corrections' funds used to
house the Broward and I.N.S. inmates and purchase Capital Outlay items.
The budget amendment will be distributed as follows:
Law Enforcement Capital $ 21,200
(1) Full Size Sedan @ 19,657
(1) Radar Unit @ 1.776
Corrections 8.085
Total $ 29.285
I am requesting this item be placed on the "Consent Agenda" at your earliest convenience.
If you have any questions or any further information is required, please let me know.
Sincerely,
Gary C/AVheeler. Sheriff
.K
The 173rd Internationally Accredited Law Enforcement Agency ,1
Accredited by the Commission on Accreditation for Law Enforcement Agencies, Incorporated 4*1
ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert,
SECONDED by Commissioner Ginn, the Board
unanimously approved the amendment to the
Sheriff's budget, as recommended by staff.
MAY 199 1998
-8-
9
•
9.A. PUBLIC HEARINGS - FINAL HEARING ON LAND
DEVELOPMENT REGULATION (LDR) AMENDMENTS
P.O. Box 1268 Vero Beach, Florida 32961 . 562-2315
oilVrtso Journal
wr ,
COUNTY OF INDIAN RNM STATE OF FLORIDA
Before the undersigned authority per;;onaUy appeared Darryl K
Hicks who on oath says that he Is ent of the Press -Journal, a
daily ne M—per published at Vero Beach in Indian River County,
Florida; that
a
P1_-_
. a 2�
billed to_.&=r0 N(�' Z�/�rn�2
was published in said newspaper In the issue(s) of
'Ind&L4 1144 !Q9,P
Sworn
rto and Subscribe before me this ��y�
qday o /4'913
w--� President
•• �P�Y ANH •• '�it�LC�o
00
10MBERLYANNE LfF
lANlutSrtll. 1001 : * ary Public. State of Florida
1: Not
`� ••tO11M N0.tCf11092 o ; MyCc sConExp.
Jan
CJI2 `01-2001
•••�• : oQ� Personally Klto— u or Produced ID O r
••'•B(/ " OFA.•'• -type of ID Produced
_-- C srstE .•
MAY 1991998
0
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
NOTICE OF AMENDMENT TO LAND DEVELOPMENT REGU-
LATIONS (LDRS) CHANGING THE UST OF PERMITTED
USES WITHIN THE RS -6 and RT -5 ZONING DISTRICTS, AND
AMENDING THE FOLLOWING CHAPTERS OF THE LAND
DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS (LDRS): CHAPTER 901, DEF-
INITIONS: CHAPTER 902, ADMINISTRATIVE MECHANISMS;
CHAPTER 911, ZONING; CHAPTER 934, EXCAVATION AND
MINING; CHAPTER 954, OFF-STREET PARKING; CHAPTER
958, SIGN REGULATIONS; CHAPTER 971, REGULATIONS
FOR SPECIFIC LAND USE CRITERIA; AND PROVIDING FOR
REPEAL OF CONFLICTING PROVISIONS, CODIFICATION,
SEVERABILITY AND EFFECTIVE DATE.
THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUN-
TY, FLORIDA PROPOSES TO ADOPT AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SPECIAL
EXCEPTION USES ALLOWED WITHIN THE RS -0 AND RT -6 ZONING DIS-
TRICTS. THESE AND OTHER AMENDMENTS WILL BE CONSIDERED FOR
ADOPTION, AS FOLLOWS:
1. Codification and modification of SR 80 Corridor Plan requirements (staff &
Board Initiated)
2. Relationship between zoning districts arul lend use designations (staff WtI-
ated)
3. Incidental to development mWng exemption (Ned by Bent Pine Goff Club,
IncdBruce BarkeM Attorney)
4. Bed and breakfasts as special exception uses in the RS -8 and RT -8 zoning
districts (filed by Mr. and Mrs. RedstorWJohn Dean, Architect)
5. Sign regulations (staff initiated)
8. MW -storage parkhq) (e 4nhtstad)
7. Affordatde housing changes to rtnetcin new exxnpreherwiva plan policies
B. (Housf� t definition and non-canrrrercial kennels (staff and Planning
and Zoning Commission--Wtiated).
9. Malted notice requirements: regular mail vs. certified mail (staff -Initiated).
10. Recreational vehicle park occupancy time period and allowance for attach-
ing carports and porches (Sunshine Travel Park/Bruce Barkett, attorney).
A PUBLIC HEARING ON THE ORDINANCE AMENDING USES WITHIN
THE RS -8 AND RT -6 ZONING DISTRICTS, AND THE OTHER DESCRIBED
AMENDMENTS, WILL BE HELD ON MONDAY Y T 5:01 P.M. AND
ON TUESDAY, MAY 19, 1998 AT 9:0.5 A.M. ATTHE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS CHAMBERS, 1840 25TH STREET, VERO BEACH, FLORI-
DA. A COPY OF THE PROPOSED ORDINANCE WILL BE AVAILABLE FOR
THE PUBLIC BEGINNING APRIL 28, 1998 IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK
TO THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS IN THE COUNTY ADMINIS-
TRATION BUILDING LOCATED AT 1840 25TH STREET, VERO BEACH,
FLORIDA. CITIZENS SHALL HAVE AN OPPORTUNITY TO BE HEARD AT
THE PUBLIC HEARINGS.
THE PROPOSED ORDINANCE, IF ADOPTED, WOULD BE EFFECTIVE IN
THE UNINCORPORATED AREA OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, AS DEPICTED
ON THE LOCATION MAP SHOWN BELOW.
Please directplanning-related questions to the current development planning
section at 587-8000, ext. 242.
Anyone who may wish to appeal en decision which may be made at this rnest-
Ing will nem to ensure that a verbatim raced of the proceedings Is made,
which frcinxtsa testimony and evidence upon which the appeal Is based
ANYONE WHO NEEDS A SPECIAL ACCOMMODATION FOR THIS MEETING
MUST CONTACT THE COUNTY S AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT
9DA)_COORDINATOR AT 5874MM X223 AT LEAST 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE
F T E MEETING.
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
BY -a- John W. Tfppin, Chaimcn
v'yy
[ 11 �� FrjUC bt�
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of May 12, 1998:
TO: James E. Chandler
County Administrator
D ON HEAD CONCURRENCE:
Obert M. Keating, AMP
Community Developmen D'
1/196
FROM: Stan Boling, AICP
Planning Director
DATE: May 12,1998
SUBJECT: Final Hearing on Proposed LDR Amendments
It is requested that the data herein presented be given formal consideration by the Board of County
Commissioners at its regular meeting of May 19, 1998.
At its May 4, 1998 special meeting, the Board of County Commissioners considered ten proposed
LDR amendments. At that meeting, the Board directed staff to make a few changes to some of the
amendments (see attachments #1 and #2). Those changes have been made and are incorporated into
the attached ordinance (see attachment #3).
The Board is now to take final action and approve, approve with modifications, or deny the proposed
ordinance.
ANALYSIS•
Minor changes have been made to 2 sections of the proposed ordinance, as follows:
-Mailed Notice Requirements
The proposed ordinance now reads in a manner that replaces the certified mail requirement with
regular mail and retains the surrounding property owner 300' notification "radius".
-Relationship Between Zoning and Land Use
The proposed ordinance eliminates the end of the last sentence of section 911.06(3)(b) and spells -out
the land use designations for the acronyms "C/1", "PUB", and "RC".
1=4 MWIT-IUMI)
The portion of the ordinance that codifies the SR 60 corridor plan development requirements differs
somewhat from the adopted corridor plan and will supercede the plan requirements. Because the
corridor plan was adopted by motion, it can be amended by motion. Therefore, to ensure that the
specific development requirements within the corridor plan are consistent with the SR 60 LDR
amendments, the Board needs to approve a motion to modify the plan requirements in accordance
with the LDRs and authorize staff to issue a revised and updated SR 60 Corridor Plan.
Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners:
1. Adopt the attached LDR amendment ordinance.
2. Modify the development requirements of the approved SR 60 Corridor Plan in accordance
with the SR 60 corridor LDRs, and authorize staff to issue a revised and updated SR 60
Corridor Plan.
MAY 199 1998
-10-
Planning Director Stan Boling stated this is the second and final hearing on these
amendments to the Land Development Regulations. He reviewed several changes which
have been made since the first hearing and noted that, in addition to adopting the ordinance,
a motion is needed to amend and reissue the SR -60 Corridor Plan.
Regarding Bed & Breakfast Uses, Director Boling continued that staff has had
several calls on the bed and breakfast proposal but most concerns seem to have been
assuaged with the addition of Paragraph 12 under "additional criteria" that multi lots are not
to be grouped together; no bed and breakfast shall be allowed within any platted subdivision
with an area of less than 40,000 square feet.
Regarding Sign Regulations, Director Boling noted that staff is recommending that
the Public Works Department be allowed to approve temporary directional signs relating to
special events.
Commissioner Macht wanted to be certain the ordinance contained stipulations for
removal of signs after an event, and Director Boling stated there are stipulations for removal
of both permitted and exempt signs.
Commissioner Adams questioned whether garage sale signs require a permit, and
Director Boling noted those events are exempt from permitting requirements.
After general discussion, Commissioner Macht noted that there would be as much
success in prohibiting sex as an attempt to prohibit garage sales.
1. EXTENDING THE INCIDENTAL TO DEVELOPMENT MINING EXEMPTION
FILED BYBENT PINE GOLF CLUB. ING/BRUCE BARKETT. ATTORNEY)
Chairman Tippin asked if the Commissioners had any questions; there were none.
The Chairman opened the public hearing and asked if anyone wished to be heard in
this matter. There being none, he closed the public hearing.
There was CONSENSUS to agree with staff's recommendations.
2. BED AND BREAKFAST USES (FILED BYMR AND MRS. REDSTONEIJOHN
DEAN. ARCHITECT)
Chairman Tippin asked if the Commissioners had any questions; there were none.
MAY 199 1998
-11- l'0'l
The Chairman opened the public hearing and asked if anyone wished to be heard in
this matter.
Ruth Meyers of 1980 West Sandpiper was in favor of the regulations with the proviso
that prevented the grouping of lots within a smaller platted subdivision.
The Chairman asked if anyone else wished to be heard regarding this matter. There
being none, he closed the public hearing.
There was CONSENSUS to agree with staff's recommendations.
3. SIGN REGULATIONS (STAFF INITIATED
Chairman Tippin asked if the Commissioners had any questions; there were none.
The Chairman opened the public hearing and asked if anyone wished to be heard in
this matter. There being none, he closed the public hearing.
Staff's recommendations were approved by a 4-1 vote, Commissioner Grin opposed
as she did not believe the restrictions were strong enough.
4. MINI -STORAGE PARKING REQUIREMENTS (STAFF INITIATED)
Chairman Tippin asked if the Commissioners had any questions; there were none.
The Chairman opened the public hearing and asked if anyone wished to be heard in
this matter. There being none, he closed the public hearing.
There was CONSENSUS to agree with staff's recommendations.
S. AFFORDABLE HOUSING CHANGES TO MATCHNEw COMPREHENSIVE
PLAN POLICIES (STAFF INITIATED
Chairman Tippin asked if the Commissioners had any questions; there were none.
MAY 199 1998
The Chairman opened the public hearing and asked if anyone wished to be heard in
this matter. There being none, he closed the public hearing.
Staff's recommendations were approved by a 3-2 vote, Commissioners Ginn and
Macht opposed due to a disagreement with the density bonus allowances.
6. HOUSEHOLD PET DEFINITIONAND NON-COMMERCIAL KENNELS
(, TAFFAND PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSIONINITIATED)
Chairman Tippin asked if the Commissioners had any questions; there were none.
The Chairman opened the public hearing and asked if anyone wished to be heard in
this matter. There being none, he closed the public hearing.
There was CONSENSUS to agree with staff's recommendations.
7. MAILED NOTICE REQUIREMENTS: REGULAR MAIL VS. CERTIFIED MAIL
,fSTAFFINITIATED)
Chairman Tippin asked if the Commissioners had any questions.
Commissioner Ginn agreed with regular rather than certified mailings but felt the
notification area should be widened to 600 feet as protection for the public. She did not
believe 300 feet would be adequate.
Chairman Tippin disagreed and felt he would rather rely on staff. He noted that in
the past when staff felt there was a peculiarity, a much broader area had been included in the
notifications.
Commissioner Macht also noted that public notice is now given with regard to these
matters.
The Chairman opened the public hearing and asked if anyone wished to be heard in
this matter. There being none, he closed the public hearing.
Staff's recommendations were approved by a 4-1 vote, Commissioner Ginn opposed..
MAY 199 1998 .,
-13- EOQA M) F
H 1
8. RECREATIONAL VEHICLE PARK OCCUPANCY TIME PERIOD AND
ALLOWANCE FOR ATTACHING CARPORTS AND PORCHES, AND
SETBACKS (SUNSHINE TRAVEL PAR"RUCE BARKETT� ATTORNEY
Chairman Tippin asked if the Commissioners had any questions; there were none.
The Chairman opened the public hearing and asked if anyone wished to be heard in
this matter. There being none, he closed the public hearing.
There was CONSENSUS to agree with staff's recommendations.
9. LDR AMENDMENTS: RELATIONSHIP BETWEENZONING DISTRICTS AND
LAND USE DESIGNATIONS
Chairman Tippin asked if the Commissioners had any questions; there were none.
The Chairman opened the public hearing and asked if anyone wished to be heard in
this matter. There being none, he closed the public hearing.
There was CONSENSUS to agree with staff's recommendations.
10. LDR AMENDMENT.' CODIFICATION AND MODIFICATION OF SR -60
CORRIDOR PLANREQUIREMENTS
The Chairman opened the public hearing and asked if anyone wished to be heard in
this matter. There being none, he closed the public hearing.
There was CONSENSUS to agree with staff's recommendations.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert,
SECONDED by Commissioner Adams, the Board
unanimously approved modifying the SR -60
Corridor Plan requirements in accordance with the
SR -60 Corridor LDRs and authorized staff to issue
a revised and updated SR -60 Corridor Plan, as
recommended by staff.
MAY 199 1998
-14-
• 0
0 - 0
REVISED SR -60 CORRIDOR PLAN WILL BE
ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
MAY 199 1998
WIEN REVISED AND RECEIVED
ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert,
SECONDED by Commissioner Ginn, the Board
adopted Ordinance 98-009, Notice of Amendment to
Land Development Regulations LDRs) changing the
List of Permitted Uses within the RS -6 and RT -6
Zoning Districts, and amending the following
chapters of the Land Development Regulations
(LDRs); Chapter 901, Definitions; Chapter 902,
Administrative Mechanisms; Chapter 911, Zoning;
Chapter 934, Excavation and Mining; Chapter 954,
Off -Street Parking; Chapter 956, Sign Regulations;
Chapter 971, Regulations for Specific Land Use
Criteria; and providing for repeal of conflicting
provisions, codification, severability and effective
date, by the following vote: Sections 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 9
and 10 were adopted by a unanimous vote; Section
3 was adopted by a 4-1 vote (Commissioner Ginn
opposed); Section 5 was adopted by a 3-2 vote
(Commissioners Macht and Ginn opposed); and
Section 7 was adopted by a 4-1 vote (Commissioner
Ginn opposed).
e10 -1:N � �yN�
-147(a) ��� fr�LC�
M 5,
,�tl
C, � 0 ' _.-05 Fr�GE cc,
O"INANCE NO. 98. 0 9
NOTICE OF AMENDMENT TO LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS
(LDRS) CHANGING THE LIST OF PERMITTED USES WITHIN THE RS -6
and RT -6 ZONING DISTRICTS, AND AMENDING THE FOLLOWING
CHAPTERS OF THE LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS
CHAPTER 901, DEFINITIONS; (CORS): CHAPTER 902, ADMINISTRATE
MECHANISMS; CHAPTER 911, ZONING; CHAPTER 934, EXCAVATION
AND MINING; CHAPTER 954, OFF-STREET PARKING; CHAPTER 956,
SIGN REGULATIONS; CHAPTER 971, REGULATIONS FOR SPECIFIC
LAND USE CRITERIA, AND PROVIDING FOR REPEAL OF CONFLICTING
R
PROVISIONS, CODIFICATION, SEVERABILITY AND EFFECTIVE DATE.
BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County
da ,
Florithat the Indian River County land development regulations (LDRs) be amended as
follows:
1• EXTENDING THE INCIDENTAL TO DEVELOPMENT M MG EXEMPTION
Amend LDR section 934.04(7) of the mining ordinance to read as follows:
() Excavation incidental to development permits.
(a) Excavation incidental to any authorized Indian River County development
order or permit, including approved site plans, subdivision plats, final
development plans and/or building permits, wherebyno more than five
thousand (5,000) cubic yards of excavated materials are removed from the
premises. This Paragraph shall not be construed to exempt excavation
activities This
in the creation of a waterbody from satisfying the water
management standards of section 934.05 of this chapter.
MAY 199 1998
•
ORDINANCE NO. 98- 0 9
(b) For excavation incidental to authorized site plans, subdivisions, or planned
developments, excavation material removal from the premises may exceed
five thousand (5,000) cubic yards, provided that:
The extraction process and hauling of excavated materials from the
premises is completed within two (2) months of commencement of
project construction, following the issuance of a county land
development permit or release of an approved site plan, as
applicable, and provided that such extraction and hauling is limited
to occurring between the hours of 7:00 am. and 5:00 p.m. Monday
through Friday;
2. Water depth within a created waterbody (as applicable) shall not
exceed twelve (12) feet;
3. The provisions of section 934.07(5) are satisfied, pertaining to the
posting of compliance and restoration bonds;
4. The provisions of section 934.09 are satisfied, pertaining to the
hauling of excavated materials on public and private roads;
5. The provisions of section 934.05 are satisfied, pertaining to water
management standards for created waterbodies; and
6. No dewatering occurs within one thcusand (1,000) feet of any
platted subdivision that is not serviced by public water,
7. Incidental to construction mining activity on projects over three
hundred fifty (350) acres in size may be permitted for a total of up
to €enrteen (14) eighteen (18) months from the date of
commencement of construction of the project's water management
system, if each of the following conditions is satisfied as
determined by the public works director and the community
MAY 19,1998
development director.
That a site plan application is submitted which provides
sufficient information to demonstrate compliance with all
applicable Chapter 934.04(7)(b) standards.
That the quantity of excess fill produced by project
construction and proposed to be hauled off-site is the result
of complying with water management or environmental
requirements, or recommendations from jurisdictional
agencies.
That the quantity of excess fill to be hauled off-site requires
more than two (2) months of excavation and hauling
activity. An initial permit allowing four (4) months of
mining and hauling activity may be issued by county staff.
An initial extension of six (6) months, and a second
extension of four (4) months, and a third extension of four
(4) months, may be granted by staff if the applicant has
demonstrated compliance with county mining regulations
for the initial period(s) of mining activity and if the
applicant demonstrates that the requested extension(s) is
(are) necessary to excavate and haul the quantity of
material involved.
As a condition of site plan approval for an incidental to
construction mining operation conducted under this
subsection [934.04(7)(b)7.], the public works director may
require public road repair work or funds or security to
guarantee such work, representing an amount of up to
twenty thousand dollars ($20,000.00). The public works
director may adjust this amount for inflation, with 1996 as
the base year.
-16-
E 0ON I U)
�J
EOOK FACE e7D 7
ORDINANCE NO. 98-_0
2. BED & BREAKFAST USES
A. Amend the definition of "Bed and breakfast inn" in LDR section 901.03, as follows:
Bed and breakfast inn an owner -occupied dwelling unit
(3) guestroomwhere guest room lodging, with or without meals, is provided for
compensation.
B. Amend a portion of the use table of LDR section 911.07(4), as follows:
C. Amend LDR section 971.41(2), specific land use criteria for bed and breakfasts, as
follows:
(2) Bed and breakfasts (administrative permit and special exception).
(a) Districts requiring administrative permit approval, (pursuant to the
provisions of 971.04): A-1, A-2, A-3, RM -8, RM -10, OCR, CN, CL.
(b) Districts requiring special exception approval, (pursuant to the provisions
of 971.05): RS -6, RT -6. RM -3, RM -4, RM -6, MED, CG.
(c) Additional information requirements:
1. Provide a site plan conforming with all requirements of Chapter
914;
2. Provide a floor plan, signed and sealed by a State of Florida
registered architect, showing the location, size and space utilization
of each room.
(d) Criteria for bed and breakfasts:
MAY 199 1998
1. The site must have frontage on a thoroughfare plan road for
administrative permit uses and major or minor arterial roads for
special exception uses;
2. A Type "C" screening must be provided on all boundaries adjacent
to residential uses for special exception uses. Type "C" for
administrative permit uses is required;
3. The project must be designed to maintain residential character;
—17—
DISTRICTS
RS -2
RS -3
RS -6
RT -6
Residential
Accessory single-family dwelling unit
A
A
A
A
Small lot single-family subdivision
A
A
Single-family dwelling
P
P
P
P
SF dwelling (attached)
P
Duplex
P
Guest cottage and servant's quarters
A
A
A
A
Single-family docks on vacant lots
A
A
A
A
Subdivisions with special side yards
A
Bed and breakfast
_
5
a
C. Amend LDR section 971.41(2), specific land use criteria for bed and breakfasts, as
follows:
(2) Bed and breakfasts (administrative permit and special exception).
(a) Districts requiring administrative permit approval, (pursuant to the
provisions of 971.04): A-1, A-2, A-3, RM -8, RM -10, OCR, CN, CL.
(b) Districts requiring special exception approval, (pursuant to the provisions
of 971.05): RS -6, RT -6. RM -3, RM -4, RM -6, MED, CG.
(c) Additional information requirements:
1. Provide a site plan conforming with all requirements of Chapter
914;
2. Provide a floor plan, signed and sealed by a State of Florida
registered architect, showing the location, size and space utilization
of each room.
(d) Criteria for bed and breakfasts:
MAY 199 1998
1. The site must have frontage on a thoroughfare plan road for
administrative permit uses and major or minor arterial roads for
special exception uses;
2. A Type "C" screening must be provided on all boundaries adjacent
to residential uses for special exception uses. Type "C" for
administrative permit uses is required;
3. The project must be designed to maintain residential character;
—17—
ORDINANCE NO. 98- 0 9
4. The number of rentable rooms is determined by multiplying the number
of dwelling units permitted on the site by 1.5 persons.
5. No cooking facilities shall be allowed in guest rooms
For
bed
and breakfast
establisbments
zoning—districts.
involying-an
historic s1ructure,
as
defined
established:
in the comly's
1 • i! ! - _-!
historic protection
be served
rooms.-_
ordinance. thp-mlicant
shall
establish
No
leeal assurances
gathering.
to ensure
that
the
staxture(s) will be
maintained
closer
and preserved
par thoroughfare
with historical
pwg=-unless
integrily.
road
frontage
7- In non-commercial
The
zoning—districts.
no
mstaurant
use sball be
established:
-.aQ. -_Y my -have
1 • i! ! - _-!
f0d mU
be served
rooms.-_
to
guests
only,
No
building, QuLdoor
gathering.
or recreational
area
shall
he located
closer
than 30 -feet
par thoroughfare
designated
pwg=-unless
plan
road
frontage
is
"I -wed, In
addiftion. each si
shall
be
!L_
1to amaximum
arec
-. .h.foot11.
buffer
-
_ shall be monument
-
fiber
oplic
ll not
lighting,
beinternally
11.
The
/ I
notcontain neonor
•
The
1
-.aQ. -_Y my -have
1 • i! ! - _-!
• n _ rent.
• - guest
rooms.-_
10.
No
building, QuLdoor
gathering.
or recreational
area
shall
he located
closer
than 30 -feet
to a residentidly
designated
pwg=-unless
a Ime
-. .h.foot11.
buffer
-
-._'
i_
. •!_1-.
11.
The
wedding
or l2aMJ
aLbject to the
owner
p-btaininp-
from the
MUM
planning
guests
divi&0A&tMnVgMM=
pC[Mit
that addresses
the
of
antici=d.
adequatg-Ruldniz.
• includes
limitations•
-number
hours
of the apecial
event,
•i-
1
.h
subdivision
square
containing
K.
anylot
�-: �-1 with
an area
o. less
than 40.000
D. Amend LDR section 954.05(6) of the parking ordinance to read as follows:
(6) Bed and breakfast. Two (2) spaces plus one space per rentable room. In the A-1. A-2
A-3 RS -6 and RT -6 zo ing districts parking spaces maybe stabilized as MMved by
the public works director.
3. SIGN REGULATIONS
A. Amend LDR section 956.01 as follows:
Section 956.01. Short title; purpose and intent.
This chapter shall be known and may be cited as the "Indian River County Sign Ordinance."
It is the intent of this chapter to promote and protect the public health, safety, general welfare,
and aesthetics of Indian River County, Florida, by regulating and limiting the existing and
proposed posting, display, erection, use and maintenance of signs, billboards, and other
advertising structures within the county.
With respect to signs advertising business uses, it is specifically intended, among other
objectives, to avoid excessive proliferation and clutter among sign displays competing for
public attention. Therefore, the display of signs should be appropriate to the land,
building or use to which they are appurtenant and be adequate, but not excessive, for the
intended purpose of identification , it
��.-.....-...�... -- —.1 -,W-" t.v...v.., -- vu -, YIJY�YYVIl, VA YLi. &"Wo.7
located on the ptemises wb=e the sign is locs However, it is. It is recognized
that a restricted number of off -premise directional signs are needed to convey information
to the public.
MAY 19, 1998
y {,
-18-
19
ORDINANCE NO. 98- 0 9
It is further intended to protect property values, create a more attractive economic and
business climate, enhance and protect the physical appearance of the county, preserve the
scenic and natural beauty of the county and provide a more enjoyable and pleasing
community. Also, it is intended hereby to improve vehicular and pedestrian safety, curb
the deterioration of natural beauty, and reduce visual pollution.
These objectives are consistent with the Indian River County Comprehensive Plan and
are vital to continued growth in the area's tourist industry which aggressively markets the
county's high "quality of life" and "scenic beauty." To this end, the sign ordinance
equitably allocates commercial and noncommercial signage and reduces the likelihood of
future clutter along the county's transportation corridors.
B. Amend LDR section 956.11(2)(H) as follows:
Section 956.11. Exemptions to permitting procedures.
(1) Provisions regulating exempted signs. The following types of signs do not require
a permit provided the sign shall: comply with applicable requirements in the
zoning district where placed; comply with other provisions in tbis subsection; and
be consistent with the spirit, intent and purpose of this chapter. All sign copy shall
be considered exempt from the provisions of this chapter. This chapter shall not
apply when state or federal regulation requires other specific posting standards.
(2) Signs exempted from permitting procedure
(h) Real estate for sale, lease, or rental signs.
1. Number of signs. One sign per street frontage advertising the sale,
lease, rental or exchange of real property or a business opportunity
may be placed on the property advertised in any district One
additional sign may be placed where the street frontage exceeds
three hundred (300) linear feet along a common road right-of-way.
2. Area requirements. Said signs shall not exceed four (4) square feet
for single-family residential uses, six (6) square feet for multiple -
family or institutional uses, and sixteen (16) square feet for
commercial or industrial sites.
3. Required setbacks. Said signs shall be located outside rights-of-
way within the applicant's property lines and shall have a ten -foot
setback from all other adjacent property lines, excepting adjacent
road rights-of-way from which no setback is required.
4. Height requirements. Residential or i:istitutional real estate signs
shall not exceed five (5) feet in height. Commercial or industrial
real estate signs or allowable real est�xe directory signs shall not be
placed within the road right-of-way, and shall not exceed the height
restrictions as set forth in Table 1 of this chapter.
5. Restrictions on copy. Real estate for sale, lease, or rental signs shall
contain only the following or any combination thereof at the option
of the sign owner:
a. House, apartment, unit, business, or other short description
of the property.
b. The words "for sale," "for lease," "for rent," "for
exchange," "see your broker," or similar phrase.
C. The registered name of the broker and the term "broker,"
"Realtor, or logo, as the case may be, if the offer is
through an agent, or the words "by owner" if the offer is
not through an agent.
d. Two (2) telephone numbers and/or "inquire within," or a
similar phrase, and a room, apartment, or unit number, if
needed.
e. Other pertinent information relating to the characteristics of
the real estate.
MAY 199 1998
-19-
0 0
0
•
ORDINANCE NO. 98- 0 9
6. Additional regulations for real estate open to inspection signs. One
on -premise sign not to exceed four (4) square feet in area inviting
the inspection of said property in all zoning districts may be placed
in addition to the sign permitted in subparagraph 956.11(2)(h)l.
Two (2) additional off -premise open house signs may be placed per
open house. However, no more than two (2) such signs may be
placed per intersection. Such signs may be located within a road
right-of-way, provided the sign is:
a. Located at least eight (8) feet from any roadway;
b. Constructed as a break away sign; and
No more than three (3) feet above the crown of the adjacent
road.
All open house signs shall be placed only when the property is
actually open for inspection and shall be displayed only between
the hours of 8:00 am. and 7:00 p.m. Said signs shall be limited to
the words "open house," "open for inspection," or other similar
words or phrases.
7. General restriction. It shall be unlawful for any person to place on
any lot, parcel of land, building, or structure any sign or similar
advertisement offering real estate or a business opportunity for
sale, exchange, lease, rent, or business opportunity for sale,
exchange, lease, rent, or inspection, except as specifically
authorized in this chapter, excepting allowable active subdivision
or real estate development signs approved pursuant to section
956.15(3) or off -premise directional signs permitted pursuant to
section 956.16(2)(e) of this chapter. The provisions of subsection
956.11(2) shall not apply to signs at the principal office or branch
office of any real estate business brokerage firm. However, such
signs are subject to the sign restrictions applicable within the
zoning district where the office is located.
8. No illumination. Real estate for sale, lease, or rental signs shall not
be illuminated in residentially designated areas.
C. Amend LDR section 956.15 as follows:
Section 956.15. Regulations for temporary signs requiring permits.
The requirements of this section apply to teMMEM signs erected for political Camoaign�
and for Mecial events For purposes of this section Q=ial event signs are tempora_;
signs announcing stiecial events to be sponsored by a charitable educational, or religious
institution. or a commercial entity. Said tempgrary signs The signs identified in
subsection shall require issuance of a permit by the code enforcement official, except as
otherwise specified herein. Prior to the placement of any of the described temporary signs
all relevant provisions of this chapter shall be
satisfied.
n. • . - n - .n .r. .n
MAY 199 1998
-20-
L`Q��� .�V� ir�UC�,P
..
nn. n � .r.nr
'. . .. .. r.' .. • •.. ..
. • . n n
MAY 199 1998
-20-
L`Q��� .�V� ir�UC�,P
ORDINANCE NO. 98- 0 9
w
• r
•I' .
11 . •..
•+1 . n
n . . �I
I•n• 11
.I 11 ....... • 1
. . I .
�Iw
r.l
i i
Irv.l
J.w
nw+
n n n
11 • 1 ql + . I
u.w n1 n .n
n n
. .n ..
n . Irn1 n nlr
uIn . n.Ir.
n n
.n ..• n
w m IRS
IIn
I . :+In • • .n '
�I I .n u1 m • I n n
Il\.1110lf'<•f11.11�'i/IIl�l1■./{T7f�1�w7.�f•l.l`•1.
�Iw
• w . .. n m... . Iw +I
11
i I JI •.1 .
1 • I n1 Ir•
1
Illi 11 •.1 1 • I 11 •
. ► I . �•111n . I .
Irv.l
J.w
nw+
n n n
11 • 1 ql + . I
u.w n1 n .n
n n
�Iw
• w . .. n m... . Iw +I
11
i I JI •.1 .
MAY 199 1998
-21-
FAGE O L�
1 • I n1 Ir•
n I
• w
.Iw. ..1 . . I.
. I • II • nrn.
n1 �r •n . .na I .
uIn . n.Ir.
MAY 199 1998
-21-
FAGE O L�
ORDINANCE NO. 98- 0 9
(aU2 Application. The applicant shall submit a written application on a form to
be provided by the code enforcement official which stipulates the
conditions under which the temporary speciabcrent sign(s) are being
requested
In addition to sign
application information required pursuant to section 956.05, the
application should include the following:
-1-W Nature of the specini eveni tMpac ry sio(s). If the tem�orary
sign(s) relate to a special event, include the location of the special
event and daily schedule of activities;
2-.W Duration of special event or camnaiQn. Include dates of
commencement and termination of the special event or political
3-.W Sign distribution. Include the proposed distribution of signage and
such other information as the county may require to assure
consistency with the spirit, intent, and purpose of this chapter,
�l Responsible agents. Identify the name of the sponsoring entity and
principal contacts responsible for erecting and removing signage.
Duration of sign display restricted Temporary special event signs may be
erected for a period not to exceed seven (7) calendar days within any six-
month period. Temporary political campaign signs may be displayed no
more than thirty (30) days prior to the election in which the candidate's
name or the issue will appear yuunoMsed candidate in the first
12rim= who will face opposition in the following general election *nay
erect te=o= political signs rttlu y (30) dais prior to the first Dn- ML
notwithstanding the fact that the candidate's name will not appear on the
first primary ballot.
,�. _lam � .�� . .-��.�•�.�
W One sign not exceeding four W square feet in size per lot or parcel
of land:
MAY 199 1998
r • r
ur w
r• .
r
r r u
.r - rnr r...
•n •rr
rn
w r
"gem nn r r
n • rnr . n n m
r rr .n. m• m
nn r
•
m.
rr•i rr.r r nw .
u
r .n . w +u
urn
. r • rnn
n • �. • r
�r - rr
� • .w •
rrr•
.0 •.n
. .•
r
(aU2 Application. The applicant shall submit a written application on a form to
be provided by the code enforcement official which stipulates the
conditions under which the temporary speciabcrent sign(s) are being
requested
In addition to sign
application information required pursuant to section 956.05, the
application should include the following:
-1-W Nature of the specini eveni tMpac ry sio(s). If the tem�orary
sign(s) relate to a special event, include the location of the special
event and daily schedule of activities;
2-.W Duration of special event or camnaiQn. Include dates of
commencement and termination of the special event or political
3-.W Sign distribution. Include the proposed distribution of signage and
such other information as the county may require to assure
consistency with the spirit, intent, and purpose of this chapter,
�l Responsible agents. Identify the name of the sponsoring entity and
principal contacts responsible for erecting and removing signage.
Duration of sign display restricted Temporary special event signs may be
erected for a period not to exceed seven (7) calendar days within any six-
month period. Temporary political campaign signs may be displayed no
more than thirty (30) days prior to the election in which the candidate's
name or the issue will appear yuunoMsed candidate in the first
12rim= who will face opposition in the following general election *nay
erect te=o= political signs rttlu y (30) dais prior to the first Dn- ML
notwithstanding the fact that the candidate's name will not appear on the
first primary ballot.
,�. _lam � .�� . .-��.�•�.�
W One sign not exceeding four W square feet in size per lot or parcel
of land:
MAY 199 1998
ORDINANCE NO. 98- 0 9
• U • 1- --l� 111- - 1 • 1 •- - is• 1'
(c) Signs shall be located wholLy on the phyate =pca an,41MM116
placed at least from all r_h_ 1 1 ffeet from all other =MM lines. and shall not eed five (5)
in height.
ifteen (15
Temp rary signs in nonresidential districts. !=Mr= signs foroln itical
o=aia' , s or aperial events are allowed in nonresidential zoning districts
subject to the following mdsions:
bit
Signs shall
be
located
wholly
on
thenn •vate
VEW=
and
shall be
placed
at least
five
(5) feet
from
as rig
t -of -way
and fifteenl15)
feet from
all other
V=ca
y lines
and shall
not exceed
ten
(10) be
in height-
(cXQ Compliance with conditions of signs) placement and removal. The
applicant shall agree to place signs in a manner consistent with the terms
of county sign regulations and remove the same pursuant to the schedule
approved as a condition of permit approved. In addition, the applicant
shall agree to conditions necessary to ensure that potential issues identified
by the county shall be effectively managed in order to promote the public
safety, avoid excessive proliferation of signage, and protect the economic
and business climate and appearance of the community. Concerning the
placement and removal of te=g ryVglitical campaign and =ial event
sigmas,. the following shall apply:
All tgmVp= signs must be removed within five (5) das after the
special event or. regarding political campaign si=. after the
election in which the candidate is eliminated or elected or after the
resolution of the respective issues by referendum.
similar object is pLghibited:
Lqj The placement of any ju=r= sign without permission of the
owner of the = M upon which the sign is placed is prohibited
(� The placement of any temposign in a public ox private road
right-of-way is prohibited• however the public works department
nay VXmye placement of tempo = traffic/directional sig�,g
within rights -of way in accordance with section 956.11(2)(b)., or
poses of this regulation the road right-of-way line shall be
deemed to be the edge of sidewalks or utility poles f g-thest�rom
the road. Where no such structure(s) are present the rit f -way
line shall be deemed to be t5entyJ20) feet back from the neaLedee
of roa way_pavement or, if unpaved, the near eft of unpaved
roadbed surface.
D. Amend LDR subsection 956.15(3) to create section 956.151 as follows:
Section 956.151 Regulations for active subdivision or real-estate development sigm
On -premise active
subdivision or real estate development signs may be erected subject to compliance
with the following conditions in addition to other applicable provisions of the sign
ordinance. These signs are not subject to subsection 956.11(2)(h), "Real Estate
For Sale, Lease, or Rental Signs."
(aXU Character of sign. Such signs shall not exceed forty-eight (48) square feet
except in single-family residential districts where they shall not exceed
twenty-four (24) square feet for model homes and sales offices only. One
additional sign may be erected on a site having a street frontage in excess
of three hundred (300) feet Such sign must be located on the premises of
the developing project or subdivision, at least five (5) feet from all rights-
of-way, and at least twenty (20) feet from contiguous property lines of
adjacent landowners. These signs may be illuminated.
MAY 199 1998
E01.1!, 105 F;1GE 73
-23-
0
•
ORDINANCE NO.98-_Da
fb)o Number of signs permitted. Only one such sign shall be permitted for each
common roadway along the perimeter of the development. Such sign must
be located on the premises of the development, at least five (5) feet from
all rights-of-way, and at least twenty (20) feet from contiguous property
lines of adjacent landowners. These signs may be illuminated.
(z)M Filing ofplat and/or site plan. Prior to the erection of such a sign, an
approved preliminary plat or a site plan for the development, as applicable,
shall be placed on file with the community development department.
Authorization for sign placement. Only the exclusive agent of the
developer or owner of the property shall be authorized to place a sign on
the property. The property owner's signed authorization consenting to the
placement of a sign representing an exclusive real estate agent on such
premises shall be filed with the community development department prior
to the placement of the agent's sign.
E. Amend LDR Chapter 956 TABLE 1., "SCHEDULE OF REGULATIONS FOR
PERMANENT SIGNS REQUIRING PERMITS," by adding footnote #7, as follows:
Table 1.
Schedule of Regulations for Permanent Signs Requiring Permits
Type Sign
Use
Formula
Mwdmamsignage area ansftksign
Maximum
Mitrhra m
Noofsign
for
helght0t)
setbackfor
perstreet
awads6e
of
fivestmulln
frontage
signage at
freestandin
g sign
,rite (sq. jk)
8 of LanesSpeed
Area
g sign
property
(mph),
(S4 FL)
line or
Up To
R1W
Freestand.
ID Sign for
NA
2
5
2 R
NA
or facade
SF or 2F'
Freestand.
Residential
NA
2
25
20
10
12
2 R
2 R
1'
or facade
3 units or
35
45
20
35
14
2 R
more
55
48
14
2.R
Freestand.
Residential
NA
4
35
20
12
14
2 ft
2 fr.
1:
or facade
3 units or
45
32
48
16
2 R
more
55
70
16
2 R
Freestand.
Commer-
1 sq. R for
2
25
48
48
20
20
5 feet from
road R[W;
it
cial
each 1 foot
35
yet
45
64
25
25 feet
frontage
55
80
25
from
intersection
Freestand.
Commer-
1 sq. lt. for
4
25
48
20
5 feet from
11
cial
each i foot
35
64
25
R/W; 25
Street
45
80
30
feet from
frontage
55
100
35
intersection
Freestand.
Industrial
1 sq. ft for
2 or 3
25
48
20
5 feet from
V
each 1 foot
35
48
25
road R/W:
street
45
64
30
25 feet
frond
55
80
35
from
intersection
Freestand.
Industrial
I sq. R for
4 or more
25
48
20
5 feet from
12
each I foot
35
64
25
roadR/W;
street
45
80
30
25 feet
frontage
55
100
35
from
intersection
Frcesumd.
Commer-
1 sq. R for
NA
NA
up to 35'
5 feet from
' 1'
cial/ Indus)
each I That
road R/W;
Institution.
street
25 feet
Complex:
frontage
from
intersection
3 to 4.9ac,
up m 60s
5 to 9.9ac,
up to 70'
10 m 19.9,
up to 150'
Over 20 ac.
up to 200'
Freestand.
Commer-
NA
One sign 1300 square feet], per 1.95 traffic
50 feet
5 feet from
V
cial/ Indust
taller 1853 only, plus that allowed in other
above the
road RM
Institution.
sections of this ordinance
crown of
25 feet
Complex
the road]
from
Located
intersection
within
1,000' of
1-95 Exit or
Entrance
Ram
Facade
on -premise
Calculated from "Street Facade Sign Area Graph and
facade
Table°
signs in
nonresident
ial districts
(The most
restrictive
formula
applies in
case of
conflict)
MAY 199 1998
-24- EOJ ZJ PAGE e� ��
r,
C` IN, 1-05, Fr1Gt 5 6
ORDINANCE NO. 98- 09
Type Sign
Use
Formula
Maximum signage area on single sign
Maximum
height (A)
Mixlnarm
setback for
Na ofsign
per street
for
of
freesrondin
frontage
cunudaf ve
freesrandin
g sign
signage at
site (sq. ft)
# of LanesFN./A
Area
g sign
propem
(Sq. Ft)
line or
R/W
Facade
1)Onthe
100%of
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
primary
sign area
frontage
street
facade
shown
Facade
2) On any
50% of
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
other
sign area
facades
shown
excepting
primary
frontage
street
facade
Facade
3) On a
25% of
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
facade
sign area
facing a
shown
residential
district
Projecting
On -premise
Same as
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
1°
sigat't
projecting
above for
sign within
Facade
nonresident
Signs
ial districts
in lieu of
freestandin
sign
Marquee or
on -premise
N/A
6'h clearance above
8 ft
N/A
N/A
I per
building
under-
identificati
ground elevation
-try
canopy
on sign
sign
within
nonresident
ial districts
attached to
a marquee
orcanopy
entrance to
a business
I No permit required for single-family residential structure duplex identification sign. Also mailboxes ao nor requaa n tc.u...
any district
Meted
2 (� r additional sgas are placed along a single street freestanding sign may be e n aamBe. such signs shall have site b frontageaving a major sum rta hundred (I00 feet minimum disten two
separation.
3 One freestanding sign shall be permitted plus that allowed in other sections of this ordinance.
4 The height of freestanding signs shall be measured from the crown of the nearest road. The height of facade signs or portions
thereof shall not exceed the height of the building to which it is attached.
5 A projecting sign may project no more than eighteen (I8) inches from the wall of a building, shall not project over a public street
right-of-way or sidewalk. and shall not project above the facade or parapet wall of the building to which it is attached.
6 only one projecting sign may be erected in lieu of an allowable freestanding sign.
7 Unto 5W allowed where armlicant dcmOnstmtcs that a taller siM is oriented so as to be seen by 1-95 motorists aching the
interchange.
4. NUM -STORAGE PARKING REQUIREMENTS
Amend LDR Section 954.05(39):
MAY 199 1998
0
.0 ............
u
..0
-25-
•
ORDINANCE NO. 98- 0 9
Mini Storage Facilities:
3M Mini curage facilities shall have a minimum of four (4) narking spaces or one
apace per 100 storap+e units whichever is greater, All spaces shall be located in
the nmximity of the office Two (2) additional spaces shall be provided if a
man aer/watchman residence is included on site A minimum 28 -foot drive aisle
for two-way traffic or 20' for one-way traffic shall be provided contiguously alone
the side of the self -storage facility containing the access points or doors to the
individual storage areas.
(a) Outdoor storage of vehicles may occur on paved surfaces or stabilized
surfaces as approved by the public works director. The outdoor storage
area must be screened from any public rights-of-way or adjacent
residentially zoned areas by a Type `B" buffer.
5. AFFORDABLE HOUSING CHANGES TO MATCH NEW COMPREHENSIVE
PLAN POLICIES
Amend LDR Section 911.14(4) as follows:
f4) DensityBonus.
4-
:6. Has a ment* rent less then on twelfth (Y12) times twenty �29) pereent
as established by tite Florida Finenee Ageney-
-2-. Affordable dweiling units provided in eempHanee with this seetion; regardless e
wheffier or not the affir&ble dweHing units are pwt of a planned develop
MAY 199 1998
•
Y.. .RifRf.P!l�fiFl
Fif/1�fTfil7l�!f�!R�l�Fi
l�f �f'!l7liflf...
.
OT W
F.T. _ _ ...
WS
MON
MAY 199 1998
•
ORDINANCE NO. 98- 0 9
d
the previsi-8
11-9 of the
seetion-
„
staff in order to -verify eempHmwe wi+ the
i-. !den* the
speeify that
Ydbjeet site as an affbrdable dwelling unit
at no time my the identified unit be ufiH2ed as
it model home,
eeenpaney
eensWdetion offlee or e9w non-residential
use, -and
is
Remde of an
aff6rdable
dwel i g; unit by
the initial owner or -any
vx�
— twenty year
titneframe, as identified
in subseetion
Mewing provisions.,
., shaH be s*eet
to one (1) of the
I&. if the ptnehasing houselteld is verified to be eithu it very
low-, lewm, or moderate ineeme household (subseeti
Prior to the issume
of it eertifieaW of oemponey for the aff6rdable
„resbietion en
approvai by eounty
„
staff in order to -verify eempHmwe wi+ the
i-. !den* the
speeify that
Ydbjeet site as an affbrdable dwelling unit
at no time my the identified unit be ufiH2ed as
it model home,
eeenpaney
eensWdetion offlee or e9w non-residential
use, -and
ii: !den* the unit's eenespending fifteen or Wfenty year
and
iii
an owner-eeetipied off-ordable dwelling unit mtot Safi*
iv. identify the Board of Gounty
Genumissioners of Indian
as the ageney with enfereemew
te enferee the terms of
and verifiesfien
the eavenaft and as 9:
VT
the baud of e oners -via its eview and
app
MAY 199 1998
C,00k. i. FAGS
E
ORDINANCE NO. 98- 0 9
�it appliemt may obt6n a densit� bones b� poviding affordable dweiiing
units within the residential develOPMent ptojmt will utilim the
demity bonm. For development prejeets UtHizing the on site 8&rdlable
dweiling ut* demity bonus, the affe.dable housing derati,-Ixm----
be determined as feHows.- .7 —.
39 -89 +0
2-39
b.. An 0*'emd 'my obtmift ft densitY b0nt's b5 Pfflvid� affierdable dweRing
mits Off-site fitlm the re9i&ntial deveiepmm� ---!-Btwltieh IIp-11
the density benw. For de-veiepmeet plejeets tt�j the e -9-- -s* ft!
offerdftble dwelfing anit density benw, the -
Me. A RIM I
bonus shaH be detamine&w feilows. dftMe housing density
io 20
2039
M4
4-G
MAY 199 1998
-28-
0
EQ K U —18
J FAGE E 5 1
..... . . . . . . . .
MAY 199 1998
-28-
0
EQ K U —18
J FAGE E 5 1
,
EG t ) FAGEO i J
ORDINANCE NO. 98- 0 9
W Dens' nus
d With reser + to owner occypied affordable dwelling units provided under
the visions of the section:
MAY 199 1998
The owner -occupant's ho hold annual adjusteinn
income ma in= e without limit following the household's
P—M se of the affordable dw Ming *Land
i Rezale of an affordable dwell irw unit by the initial owner or any
sub e• �»ent owner shall be subject to one of the followtng
provisions:.
..
-_
w 11=111;
.� ..
d With reser + to owner occypied affordable dwelling units provided under
the visions of the section:
MAY 199 1998
The owner -occupant's ho hold annual adjusteinn
income ma in= e without limit following the household's
P—M se of the affordable dw Ming *Land
i Rezale of an affordable dwell irw unit by the initial owner or any
sub e• �»ent owner shall be subject to one of the followtng
provisions:.
0
ORDINANCE NO. 98-L_q_
Prior to the issuance of a certificate ofoccuPancv for the
affordable
dwelling unitfsl a separate private deed Cnvf--nnnt- entitled
firestriction on transfer". shall be filed in the nublic records Indian River County The covenant shall b . ct to review and
proval b�co n+ staff in T to verafv COmDliance with the
er �nirements of this section and the covenant sh&
MAY 199 1998
-30-
0
ORDINANCE NO. 98- 0 9
1b5T1WffT1J1 fir
&99
ir
• i Kl r
aDter 926
A Pnmval procedure and other re..lirementS All nlannea developments shat be reviewed
L •�- *equirements of Chapter 915 Planned Development.
HOUSEHOLD PET DEFINMON AND NON-COMMERCIAL KENNELS
Amend LDR Section 901.03 as follows:
Household pet animals that are customarily kept for personal use or enjoyment within the
home. Household pets shall include but not be limited to domestic dogs, domestic cats,
domestic tropical birds, and rodents. ' * ��' 'pets sha11 not Lclude livestock
oats swine (;mUdjnv "aOt-be 1Le� viHs"1 and
Livestock horses, mules, cattle, sheep, goats,
other grazing animals.
Amend LDR Section 971.08(8) as follows:
(c) Criteria for noncommercial kennels and animal care -bearding' places:
2.
MAY 199 1998
A noncommercial kennel or animal beffridirig care Ply shall be
considered any building or buildings, including a residence or residential
accessory structure, other structure, or land use, designated, or arranged
for the boarding, breeding, or care of a total of five (5) or more dogs, cats,
rabbits, poultry or other domestic animals belonging to the owner or
occupant thereof. This shall not be interpreted to include stables, which is
a use regulated elsewhere in this chapter, nor shall noncommereid
:;- &eJ5 include livestock:
Noncommercial kennels and animal boarding places shall be allowed in
the above described districts only as an accessory use;
13
all-adjaeent-prePe �mmerTial kennels and non-com?n
atT11II,o� rarer niaSeS FOr Lne ke
P„ino Of "Quiet" anlmalc ciirh as rabbits.
�� 1 bir ' c��ch ni eons anv indoor faciLty must na+eet Le
reauirea zonine d;ctrict setback' oar facilities Le Q �aoe nen or
�a� ar�i sha;i have a imi•m setback of 30'. For the keenme4f
nim t h dogs a_nd talking birds. the ��*e mail nave a
,n,n,mum size of 40 000 a^u?re feet' indoor facilities shall_h�v�
,ninimum setback Of 30' and Outdc^* facilities shall have a mmiffiuM
�ethack_of 75':
-31-
0 - 0
ORDINANCE NO. 98- 0 9
4. Conditions may be imposed to ensure adequate mitigation or attenuation
of noise impacts;
5. Exception. An owner or occupant of a single family detached parcel or lot
shall not be considered to be maintaining or using said property as a
noncommercial kennel or animal boarding place, notwithstanding other
limitations stated in this section, where all four of the following conditions
are satisfied:
a. Such use does not or will not involve the primary harboring or
keeping of more than two (2) animals edw than widin outside the
principal residential dwelling; and
b. Such use does not or will not involve the placement or construction
of an outside animal kennel boarding structure or kennel cage of
any kind for more than two (2) animals; and
C. The owner or occupant has complied with any applicable animal
control statute or ordinance with respect to the vaccination,
licensing, registration, and restraint of the animals intended to be,
or being, kept on such property; and
d. Such use does not or will not involve the keeping of more than a
total of six (6) such animals, not counting litters of young less than
the age of four (4) months on-site.
7, MAILED NOTICE REQUIREMENTS: REGULAR MAIL VS. CERTIFIED
MAIL
Amend LDR Section 902.12(4)(b)2. as follows:
2. Mailed notice; posted notice. Additionally, the community development
department shall .send ,by regular mail a written
courtesy notice to all owners of property within three hundred (300) feet of the
outer limits of the area described in the petition requesting a change, advising all
such owners as shown upon the last prepared and completed tax assessment roll of
the county, in simple terms, the proposed change and the time and place of the
public hearing. In the event that more than ten (10) lots or parcels are proposed
for rezoning, notification shall be by published notice only. For rezoning requests
the community development department shall erect and conspicuously place upon
the subject property at least one notice which shall contain the following
information:
Map of property which is the subject of the rezoning petition;
b. Present zoning and requested rezoning classification; and
C. Dates of scheduled hearings.
8. RECREATIONAL VEHICLE PARK OCCUPANCY TEM PERIOD,
ALLOWANCE FOR CARPORTS AND PORCHES, AND SETBACKS
Amend CRVP zoning district regulations LDR sections 911.13(1)(e)3 and 4, and
911.13(1)(f), as follows:
911.13(1)(e)3. Use limitations. Ne-permenew sStructures such as carports,
cabanas, screen rooms, or similar structures may be erected or
constructed at any recreational vehicle site, if such structures are
attached to a recreational vehicle with removable attaching devices.
aad the iRemoval of wheels or hitch and the placement of the unit
on a foundation or piers is prohibited Natwiths' 1' 9, Plop -out
units and similar equipment integral to the recreational vehicle as
manufactured shall be peratitte . allowed without issuance of
coRM building permits.
MAY 199 1998
-32-
1101-11" FAt;� e�4J
E10L1K
ORDINANCE NO. 98- 0 9
911.13(1)(e)4. Permanent occupancy prohibited. No recreational vehicle shall be
used as a permanent place of abode, dwelling, or business or for
indefinite periods of time. Continuous occupancy extending
beyond three+;) cix (61 months in any twelve-month period shall be
presumed to be permanent occupancy.
Any action toward removal of wheels of a recreational vehicle for
temporary purposes of repair or to attach the trailer to the ground
for stabilizing purposes is hereby prohibited.
911.13(1)(f) Size and dimension criteria:
CRVP ZONING DISTRICT
Zoning District Regulation CRVP
Unit of Measure
Maximum density 14
unitstacre
sq. feet
Minimum space size 2,000
feet
Minimum space width 32
Minimum yard'
feet
Front 20
Side 10
Rear 10
Accessory strucn?re 6' from pea e=
adiace^ nt RY
Maximum lot coverage 40
percent of space
percent of space
Minimum open space 25
feet
Maximum building height 35
Minimum district size 8
gross acres
?rt�tP 4ethacks and sena*aron distances for mobile homes
shall be the same as
t..we.7
those to the RMH 8 district For RVs within utan.a«��
4V nar�re the fnlloWlne
separation distances beriveen RVs shall amply:
Side-to-side: 10 ft.
b. Fnd-to-side 8 ft,
End-to-end:_ 6 ft.
[Staff Note: The proposed setbacks are based upon fire code standards for RVs.]
ZONING DISTRICTS AND
LAND USE
9. RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN
DESIGNATIONS
Amend LDR section 911.06(3)(a) and (b), as follows:
(3) Relationship with land use map. -
(a) The agricultural and Waal districts may be established in the following land use
designations:
Land Use Designation
District AG -1 AG -2 AG -3 R 2
PUB REC
A-1 X -- X===
x �
A-2 X= X
A-3 X= X= X
X==
—
RFD — -- --
X X_ X`-
RS -1 -- — —
�
01stact not permtucu
(b) The existing Agricultural -1 and rural districts may
be considered consistentvrith
ggntinLe wi+hip the Urban3m ice Area when
those areas are currently used for agricultural uses, serve as or enhance open space
of
or green belt areas of the county
MAY 199 1998
.��, 1f J" 8,
t.f+ Fr�:�Cr V
-33-
• 0
0
ORDINANCE NO. 98- 0 9
Amend LDR section 911.07(3). Single-family residential districts, as follows:
(3) Relationship with land use map. Single-family districts may be established in the
following land use designations:
Land Use Designations
Zoning District L-1 L-2 M-1 M-2 REC
RS -2 X X — — X
RS -3 X X T_- —
RS -6 — X X T
RT -6 — X X T
X - District permitted
T - District permitted when used as transition from less intenseldense development or
consistent with existing development
— - District not permitted
Amend LDR section 911.08(3). Multiple -family residential districts, as follows:
(3) Relationship to land use map. Multiple -family districts may be established in the
following land use designations:
Land Tlce Designations
Zoning District
L-1
L-2
M-1
M-2
RM
RM -3
X
X
RM -4
X=
�=
RM -6
X
X
X
RM -8
—
X
X
RM -10
X
X - District permitted
— - District not permitted
Amend LDR section 911.10(3). Commercial districts, as follows:
(3) Relationship with land use map. The commercial districts may be established in
the following land use designations:
Commercial Land Use Designation
C---Eonmzez�ct2c1
C/I - Commercial industrial
PUB - Public
RC - Regional Commercial
i-- fndastria3
'PRO may also be established in L-1, L-2, M-1, and M-2 land use designations.
'CN may also be established in AG -1, AG -2, AG -3, R, L-1, L-2, M-1, and M-2 land use
designations.
MAY 199 1998
-34-
HIM � lJ �� FAGE J" J4
ORDINANCE NO. 98- 0 9
Amend LDR section 911.11(3). Industrial districts, as follows:
(3) Relationship to land use maps. Industrial districts may be established in the
following land use designation:
Commercial/Industrial
District NO&S C/I Earridors PUB Indastlial Nodes
IL X X 3_
IG X X K_
Amend LDR section 911.13(3)(b), as follows:
(3)(b) Land use and location. The Rose4 district is established in the Roseland area of
the county and is consistent with the L-2 mid NH land use designations.
Amend LDR Section 911.14(2), as follows:
(2) Uses.
(a) Any uses not otherwise prohibited in this chapter shall be considered
permitted uses subject to the land development regulations and
comprehensive plan of Indian River County and subject to the following
restrictions:
MAY 199 1998
mo\ �`-Y cs �_ z
V b` f r�l1C 6
Residential communities shall be permitted on property with the
following land use designations on the future land use map: M-2,
M-1, L-2, L-1, C-2, —Cal R, AG -1, AG -2 and AG -3. All planned
development (PD) projects approved in any area designated as AG,
Agriculture, on the future land use map shall meet the following
criteria:
(i) The density of the project shall not exceed the maximum
density of the AG land use designation; no density transfers
from off-site lands and no density bonuses shall be permitted
within PD projects in AG designated lands;
(ii) Lots created through the PD process shall not exceed one
acre in size, with the remainder of the area designated as
open space; such open space area shall be established
through recording in the public records as a
conservation/agriculture use easement which shall restrict
use of the open space area for agriculture, open space, or
recreation as permitted in subsection iii below for perpetuity
or until the -Board of County Commissioners authorizes
release of the easement based upon an increase in the land
use plan density for the subject property.
Open space areas shall be retained as natural areas or used
for agricultural uses; however up to thirty percent of the
open space area may be used for recreational purposes in
AG -1 areas and twenty-five (25) percent in AG -2 areas and
twenty (20) percent in AG -3 areas.
Complementary and compatible A c•»lfinlly-r .elated commercial
and industrial uses may be included provided they occupy no more
than ten (10) percent of the total project gross area.
2. Commercial centers shall be permitted on property with the
following land use designations on the future land use map:
commercial/industrial nodes-mid-corridms 'P"'^ a ommercial.
and public.
3. Industrial centers shall be permitted on property with the following
land use designation on the future land use map:
commerciallindustrial node and , mid
public.
4. Public and quasi -public centers shall be permitted on property with
the following land use designations on the future land use map:
Public, any commercial/i
in—doMd designation.
-35-
•
ORDINANCE NO. 98- 0 9
5. Multiple use centers may be permitted on property with the
following land use designations on the future land use map: All
Commercial and Industrial Nodes and £WfidOrs• Parcels with more
than one land use designation may be developed in accordance with
the overall land use designation and corresponding acreage.
Amend matrix found in Section 911.03 as shown in the attached matrix.
10. CODIFICATION AND MODIFICATION OF SR 60 CORRIDOR PLAN
REQUIREMENTS
ESTABLISH LDR SECTION 911.19: SR 60 CORRIDOR SPECIAL DEVELOPMENT
REGULATIONS
U Purp ise and Intent The overall pgrpose and intent of these reations is to
W r ---- a an - racfi a aid inviting corridor.
Provide for a sufficient mo t of attractive and well-maintained landscaping to
complement b »i )dings and stru"t"as "NAt.-Corridor:
Fncgua�c ucvcawaa
e„+ „f at,rn[•tive hMid irigs within the corridor,
r Oy inn nPnrni Menage that avoid$ a OaT CiI and vrsuallV C.ANI.S-FJ. ��+
a$peAmpe�he comdor.
LeavF c a.icau•a. '� '^^� anti hnildines of gg�it� that are articulated and
�r
rnesented at a_h»m_ n s e:
. o� hve approaches that result in buildinas of endurin character through
ucQ ofguality�eS.� a -^d building�matenals: and
•'� SR 60 Corridor consistent with the folio«^ng vision statement:
ti
T) Boundaries of the SR 60 COrlidOr
R^ t the SR 60 Corridor Plan are shown ^^ the county's official �nnin atlas
the 'p�„darieS include all the land from U nd Avenue to 43rd Avenue and
n
from
261h Stmt to 16 street and including all Cd designated 1 nd in the I -95/R 60
node located south of l 6th Street (extended).
( Specific jollm-` "-'atio Within the SR 60 Corridor
In the SR 60 Corridor Plan area the followin Mecial regulations and exemptifflLd ll
1 �o new development and redevelopment nroiect� s that require mMg-r srte4IM
L4) F.xemutions
MAY 199 1998
1 4 l f 1 ev lopment and r d v lopment sh 11 be exempt frOM all SR
60 Comdor special developpgnt reQrrlatrons.
Multi :MULdoLel=mmt—shWLtLeMMZA'OrnfQundad=inntina
i•
.• "7.•- •' _Eli.. -� �i:.� • !•!_ •� ! • • !_ -•
• • • ice!
•
iAi;�t�y r
ORDINANCE NO. 98- 0 9
4 Electrical_ substations and similar uses that prohibit access byte pub is
onto the site may be exempted from architectumVbuild'ng re=uirements if
the exempted building(s) and equipment will be visually greened from
adjacent properties and roadways.
02) Uses
With the following exceptions uses within the corridor are allowed as Specified in
LDR Chanter 911(zoning or inance):
L Temporary uses: no temporary outdoor sales uses shall be located closer
than 200' to SR 60 or any Thoroughfare Plan road rig t -of way unless a SR
60 and Thoroughfare Plan road landscape buffer as specified in the
landscaping section. has been established between the temporary sales use
and the adjacent SR 60 or Thoroughfare Plan road right -of way*
2,. Uses involving vehicle and service bays that are oriented p=endicul_ar to
SR 60 are allowed only if a Type "B" buffer with a 4' o=ue feature is
provided along the site's SR 60 frontage
u4 Definitions
The following terms are defined for the SR 60 special development re ation
W "Facade": for V=oses of appJ dng architec=altbuildine standards a facade shall
mean any face of a building (including the visible portion of roofl which is visible
from a roadway and/or residentially designated area.
W "Low sloped roof' • a roof with a slQ= less than 5.12 (rise•nml Flat roofs are
included in this tens and classification.
Lcl "Visible roof structure" • a partial or perimeter roof (used in conjunction with a low
sl=d roof) that gives the appearance of having a true "ehip.shed. or mansard
roof, A pgmpet wall is not a "visible roof stnwtum".
u In all sections other than Color & Building Graphics the terns "finish" and
"exposed" shall refer to materials or systems which may be visible and shall not
refer to a paint or coloring system applied over said materials or systems
W "Visually offensive elements": stn ctums that include: vending machines gaming
machines, ice machines telephones walk-in cooleffinezers trap formers
electrical equipment (including_panels and metersl wate_ r owepiping and
valves p�ui 1pc satellite dishes antennas fans. exhausl vents,comnreccnn
generatorstanks. and similar -Quip=,
(0 "Nuisance elements": stnlams that have visual and noise impacts including:
Loading and unloading dock areas A=ster and trash container areas nd
commercial grade HVAC equipment,
W "Nonconforming sign": a sign located in the SR 60 Corridor that was permitted
prior to adoption of the SR 60 -Corridor special rea��lations and does not meet these
s ial sign regulations
(W "Nonconforming_�roperty±_a =MM with improvements that were 12=31 ed
prior to the adoption of the SR --60 Corridor special regulations and that do not meet
the SR 60 Corridor special regulations,
Qi "Com an tible proper"• My pro with improvements permitted prior to the
adoption of this rode and conforming to the 4R 60 Conidor' al SR 60 and
thoroughfare plan road buffer b) color and c) * irementc
(M Submittal & Review Requirements
W Preliminary Review (o tional_)• Preliminary staff review of siteplans landscaping
and tree preservation plans architectural i2lans, lighting plans and color and
exterior finish samples is strongiy encouraged
MAY 199 1998
-37-
• 0
•
ORDINANCE NO. 98- 98---L9
SR 60 Review Requirements: Th drawings listed below are to be submitted on a
minimum 24" 36" format. and are to be the I --st sc ' which will fit on a 24" X
36" forma
In addition to norm site p21an review submittal reauirem is the following
are to be submitted at the time of site plan review:
MAY 199 1998
••i of an.•location
caliperand go
"visually offens elements" as described in fliese jLqUimme-=
b� Tree Sgn&y: Shall indicak Jocatiom diameter at 4.5' aboy-umd-g.
above gmuuM and
lamm
cs Landspape Plan (mav be incorporated into site plan)• Shall include
calculations demonstrating compliance with each landpe
ordinance and SR 6(1 cnecial landscaningreguirement
.. Building Floor Plans shall dggicl, general locations of entries and
PY+±s restrooms and general uses.
e Roof Plan Shall indicate roof type slope and anv "visually
offensive elements" (as described in these reauircments) and
desc 'rations of greening device$
Buil linievat►s. Sb �include all e teg for building elevations.
�•..,u.l
including all itemsaffecting ft =eamnce of the bulldLng.
including r sign• coin to escrip��n of extenor building
r,a*Pna s ex�erior building colors all loading zones mechamcal
and electricMl �u�pment locations and their required screening
dodces and sig s a ached to buildings
Certification from the projgct architect or en 'Wept h t proposed
roof plans and elevation pia^� *^eP+ rhe SR 60 corridor
a gbitPch raUbuilding standards
Prior to site planregse. pplicants shall submit to planning staffth ce sets
or the .oliowine and shall obtaic�nlanning staff nnroyal of same:
a.S ,e L fight ng Plan_(maX be inco orated into site plan):Must_
innicate site lighting plan as well as a light fixture schedule with
cut sheets (wTiii'n E..or; iications and p;crt,rial representation
including photometric chard for all site lighting fixi MM- Th_ is
includes any ite li 'ng fixtures attached to buildings
-38-
0
h' �-,
E'�'-'"� - U, _� . FACT: i P
011; i PACE
ORDINANCE NO. 98- 0 9
(6) Landscaping
The countywide landscaping requirements of LDR Chap--er 926 shall apply except as
noted herein.
W. Increased Canopy Tree Size
1 -17741 0
W SR 60 and Thoroughfare Plan Road Buffer
Within the corridor elan area. the following Iandscape buffer shall be provided
along the entire length of a site's SR 60.43rd Avenue. 58th Avenue. 66th Avenue.
74th Avenue. 82nd Avenue. 90th Avenue. and 98th Avenue frontages. except for
approved driveways:
Minimum Planting/Berm
Buffer Depth RRe uirementsep r 100'
4 canopy trees
5 understory trees
20' or more Continuous hedge': 1 W-2%'.
high atIn anting
Berm: 1Y2-'- 3' high'
4.5 canopy trees
5.5 understory trees
IL Continuous hedge': 1'/Z -3'
high at planting
Benn: l'-2Y2'high'
5 canopy Uves
6 understory trees
10, Continuous hedge': 2Y2'-3'
Project sites with a depth from SR 60 or a Thoroughfare Plan road of 250'-400'
shall have a buffer dem of at least 15'. Sites with a dgth over 400' shall have a
buffer depth of at least 20'.
(See Figures F-4 and F-5 at end of section 911.18. "Wabasso Corridor
Re ations")
1NOTE: The hedge and berm combination shall provide a visual screen 4' high
above the grade of the project site parking_area Hedge material shall provide full
scn=in to the ground: thereforewax myrtles and shrubs with similar leafing
characteristics shall not be used for hedge material unless a double row
arrangement is used At the time of a certificate of occupana (CO) for therpoiect
site, the combination of berming�and hedging shall provide a 4' visual screen.
subiect to comfy sight distance requirements Undulations in the berm and
corresponding hedge height are encouraged
Hedge shrubs shall be planted no further apart than 24" on center alonghe eng lei
of the buffer strip to form a hedge that appears continuous as viewed from the
roadway being buffered. Berms shall have a slope no steeper than 3 horizontal to 1
vertical and shall be continuous along he le gth of the buffer strip. -Q&q= where
berth modifications may be necessary for tree preservation as determined by the
commutity development director or his designee,
MAY 199 1998
-39-
0
• i
ORDINANCE NO. 98- 0 9
CLustering of trete along the buffer stria is encouraged and uniform spacing of
trees is discouraged except where used to emphasize a particular planting theme or
dei eloelonment style Hedge plantings Ay beasvtnmetrical and a buffer wall.-
to
all to exceed 4' in height excep as We
sified elow is allowed within the middle one
third of the buffer strip's width (measured perpendicular to the road being
bufferedl if landscaping material is planted on each side of the wall
( SSliecial Buffer for roiects
Multi family_proiects shall pn Ovide the 4R 60 and Thoroughfare Plan Road buffer
as described above with the additional requirement that the buffer shall include a
6'apague feature (as described in Chanter 9261 Where a wall or fence is used -
such wall or fence shall be located within the middl_e one third of the buffer snip's
width (meamod Ileroendicular to the road being buffered). and landscaping
material shall be planted on each side of the wall or fence
(M Local Road A Exclusive Access Driveway Buffer
Landsg= strips along local roads and exclusive driveways (as defined in the
traffic ordinance) within the corridorl2lan area must contain 2 understory trees for
ev=y 30 Lneal feet
Ue Intedor Parking Area
in addition to the normalinterior car.WP- - of _D • - •_.
MITI-
" • � 1. - � % }�.._! • . _}. • _ • ! • }.}_!.} _ • 1 .. • l - !\ 1 • !,
Foundation plantings shall be ri aired as stated below for buildings in commercial
and industrial areas and for businesses allowed in residential areas. However. for
industrial and store e buildings located in the CH IL and IG zoning distric
foundationplanting ins shall be exempted for sides of buildings not fronting on
a residentially designated area or public or platted road
Alone the front. sides and rear of buildings. the following foundation
planting landscape strips shall be provided in accordance with the building
heig Int•.
mu-
• SLr.. 1
Within such foundation planting: landsop_estrips, the following
landsojingshall be _provided•
gs Fo 401percent of the foundation wdmetff Lcacluding
entrum ys and overhead dooms along all building faces shall be
landscaped. as follows•
*For ht Iftes um to I7 in hdgln
Minimum vlamilm area depth: �S
Minimum plum material repaired: '1 omm tax or aomomime canopy nee far every 10 lineal feet
of olamine strip (clustered)
• 1 wukmtmv tree for every 20 lineal fed of reaaired olanNng
'3 shrubs for evdv 10 sauam feet of mmimd olentiim area
'_CGm;md cover. Flowering ohms or sod in the remanine
olamine area
MAY 199 1998
-40- EQ'
2.
Landsg=
barrier,
islands
and 1
shall be
be • i111.
backfilled
" to maximumheightofaboye
at least
to the to
of
curb or
the
=tective
• ac
Foundation
t_ 1
Foundation plantings shall be ri aired as stated below for buildings in commercial
and industrial areas and for businesses allowed in residential areas. However. for
industrial and store e buildings located in the CH IL and IG zoning distric
foundationplanting ins shall be exempted for sides of buildings not fronting on
a residentially designated area or public or platted road
Alone the front. sides and rear of buildings. the following foundation
planting landscape strips shall be provided in accordance with the building
heig Int•.
mu-
• SLr.. 1
Within such foundation planting: landsop_estrips, the following
landsojingshall be _provided•
gs Fo 401percent of the foundation wdmetff Lcacluding
entrum ys and overhead dooms along all building faces shall be
landscaped. as follows•
*For ht Iftes um to I7 in hdgln
Minimum vlamilm area depth: �S
Minimum plum material repaired: '1 omm tax or aomomime canopy nee far every 10 lineal feet
of olamine strip (clustered)
• 1 wukmtmv tree for every 20 lineal fed of reaaired olanNng
'3 shrubs for evdv 10 sauam feet of mmimd olentiim area
'_CGm;md cover. Flowering ohms or sod in the remanine
olamine area
MAY 199 1998
-40- EQ'
El0�X
ORDINANCE NO. 98-09
-For WIDE of IT W Min height
Il uw1 planfina am depdr.'
minimum u :l ' !hY
can
yv'�.aLL11, yL1. ' linmifect ofn=Wrcd plmftg
d
-alai 10fl_!l.
LL1JLL• JLy i! 'YLLu' ' utJ�
vlantiftil
d.1! g• 11 Waht
7'1
Minimum plant nmterini la5l'1 5- auJ'1 tree
with a injM= WSM Of If elch may sub :!si_:_
for each .'iu tmcl
y'uL.'i '1 L1. S=gt ofv=WMd planting"_-
plantinu :m
b, The following modifications vsn% I from the
buildings to avoid conflicts with archillecumaliOMICL(I&
rwindows.
2. The dol of foundation planting 9 ified-if
the overall minimum• - • . • R d_ A • .
plantings proposed _ or -• &=... -.
12y a Wical Imut.
W Increased Foundation Plantings for "Blank Facade" Building Faces
As referenced in the architectur"milding standards section of this plan. "blank
facade" building faces that are unarticulated areallowed if foundation plantings are
provided as specified above with a 100% increase (doubling) in required plant
material uantities (as specified above).
(See Fio ire F-7 through F-1 0 at the end of section 911-19)
M Connection to Pedestrian System
P_Lqjects fronting on roads with existing or planne&mquired sidewalks and/or bikeways
shall provide a pedestrian path from the project to the existing or fixture sidewalk and/or
hikewav Said pedestrian Hath shall have a minimum width of 5' shall consist of a rigid
surface meeting Florida Accessibility Code requirements and may include properly
marked areas that cross parking -lots and driveways.
Architectural/Building. Standards
( Prohibited Architectural Styles: The following are prohibited:
1 Corporatesignatureor commercial protot W architecture unless such is
consistent with these special corridor requirements. Examples of such
Prohibited architecture include flat roofed convenience stores- aag stations.
and canopies for as Mations car washes and drive through facilities (see
Figure B -D-
_ �u1i1 I.•N•nnu. WMI"umm.
_ nuu mn f� iuilIwp�
- _' a•.....,.�..�}�, - I til: b�_
i
Figure B-1
2. Any
kitsch
_ !_ L._
(such
as a
buildingthat
doesnot }}
. W
ical
dinosaurs.
sh. edible food.
or
other
such items
such as giant
oranges. ice
cream cones,
MAY 199 1998
1 5 f A G,-
-41-
0
ORDINANCE NO. 98- 0 9
Anv architecture havina_a historical reference hat is so different from pummt
design nhilosoRhy that such refer pre is inconsistent and/or income ible with
surrounding Mictures Examples of such include• igloos. domes or geodesic
domes. Quonset style structures. tecpm log cabins 3mg= "false fronts"
medieval castles -caves. and the like
f Architectura//Building Eremptlons & Snecial Requirements
—I Industrial and Stomge Us�s in Districts: QQmpUance
shall be required only for those facades fron
the color r-equiremem.
Residentially Designated Properties: The fol lowing materials are approved
for use in residentially designated areas: fiberglass or asphalt s 'n lg a -style
roofing for sloped roofs and visible roof sttucaues. and textured ood as
a finish product. Rooftop screenina_devicm shall not be required for attic
ventilators or plumbing, roof vents on residentially desig att ted pmpclties.
However roof ventilators roof vents and the like shall be located where they
will be least visible from roadways.
Njill 'A
• _i� � �.i� _ _ 1. •_ .y- � �, .. . � . n • � • : , 1_ • • 3 �_l�.�_� z
. � _1 Sl cam, �- .- - •.�� Y ��-- . � �- 1, .- �• .
a. the initial shopping center or outnarcel was built prior to the
enactment of the SR 60 special regulations and
. it is 1 - Vii!! . - 1 by the communiV • - - • • !_ - . -doa=ent that
enforcement of tWs requirement wovld conflict vAth &c intera of
4 Electrical Substations and Similar Uses: Electrical substations and similar
uses that prohibit access by the public into the site may be exempted from all
architectural/building mquirements by the community development director
if the exempted building(s) and equipment will be visually screened from
Aacent Rronerties and roadways.
1 Buildings with facades fronting on more than one street shall have similar
design considerations (e.g. roof treatment. building articulation. entrance
features. and window placement) and consistent detailing on all street
fron es.
! J 11 �•Mt. 1 • 1 -•
1 ti". • • Yui- � - • •- _l' - .1- } r - - �_�YiC. • 1
!" '_!_ � �_�_�L�1. _moi•! � - - � 1 ,�� .!- - Yy.•_}•
IL Tae following materials or systems are prohibited as a finish and/or
exRosed product: corrugated or ribbed metal panels smooth finish
concrete block (standard concrete masonry units). precast concrete tee
MAY 199 1998
C
-42- 0 ckw
ORDINANCE NO. 98- 0 9
,ymms ply -good or textured plywood PlMwood shall be allowed for
soffit material.
ct Any canopy (such as for a gas station car wash or drive through
faciliWj that is wholly or partially within 75 feet of a Thoroughfare
Plan road right -of way shall meet the following r_ggLirements
concenilrlg, maximum facia height (this mains to all facia on the
above described canopy including any canopy facia that continues
beyond the 75 foot 1lm_itl:
d
(See Figure
Plastic
Plastic
F-1 I at the end of section 911
or metal is prohibited as a finish
is nrnhihite d as a finish material
191
material for walls or trim.
for slolm roof& visible roof
etn,cnnrc,
and facial. Aldmgh prohibited
in general. certain met�l
• l_.t - • ..- -
and plastic
construction products may
be approved by the PI nni a
and Zo
i a Commission anon a written
request and product amvLe
submitted
by the applicant The Planning
and Zoning ('ommias.
mays
mv- a use of the material if the followimg
criteria are satisfies
i,The
product shall M=ar authentic
from the closest distance
that it will be viewed by the generalup
blic.
shall be substantial
Thin and flimsy imitations
iL
Ilm =duct
are unacceptable.
ai.
Thwproduet shall hold up as
is it be fabricated
well as the product-it—La
in such away that it
finitadna, That must
will retain its ori6nalshapg. WParance
and color_ as well as
the pum ct it is imitating.
iv.
The product's color shall resemble
the color of the =duct it
is imitating.
g,
A=
exposed masonry in a stack bond
is tlrobibited
f.
Lighting
sgugum or strip li6fing
that follows the form of the
building,
parts of the building or building
elements is pmhibited.
gl
Neon
and similar tube and fiber optic
lighting and similar linear
lighting
systems. where the neon or lighting
-tube or fiber is visible.
is prohibited
(this restriction includes
site sigawcL
h.
Backlit
transparent or translucent architectural
elements backlit
Li
(IS{alll
lGl.LYia elements.1 well as illuminated
-
ngs d
or backlit awnian
roof of
ml nted elements are prohibited,
This does not probibit the use
of glass
blocks. This does not prohibit
the use of an illuminated sign
attached
to a building.
MAY 199 1998
windows not be located on building facade
• _l. lane. Speakers shall be •.lei.-• so aslto • -sox-rd
tomwd residential
-43-
• !.1_ 1
5... ,_ • l_.l
• l_.t - • ..- -
• - 11. • -
L.
t ' • _ _!. - ._1_I_ •
MAY 199 1998
windows not be located on building facade
• _l. lane. Speakers shall be •.lei.-• so aslto • -sox-rd
tomwd residential
-43-
•
ORDINANCE NO. 98-0 9
(M Roofs and Paranets:
•� Y��1
•
.!"• •
• • • �,!Y-..
(M Roofs and Paranets:
• - • •_. til UTy- - } - • , -11 SS _ !•i • t.- I n - }
=13 TUF=6
• • Mut L_S2 ! .- } . - . • •�- • _ 2 . Win. . nl S.._! -{!..._! ._� Y� -
� .• }l� _C " • _ a. ! �Y •'- .C_- - • - � -. - Wil. -!. S_ C' " -!{ � �. _}_ • • - •
4- T;wl Bell
- _ - yam_ . • � •- .- �!. -• c.S�_ Y_.� ;.:. }.
c... - � - 1. • • ! !..- • . �• • • • __}_ } • • • { ' _ � • {K} ._ .�
I The following ro• Mles are-=hijbited:m" bowstring, dome.
(risexun) maximurn pit&h mdih a "skirted" or flared" lower Wition at a 3:12
(rise:nm) minimum V_iLch is allowed),
The
• • • • .. _} •ul&• • • • • • Yi
{_!
• '
wa
uu
2 s {
r • • •!l •• _ n. .•�
(Figure B-2)
Ga
•
e -
e r
vertical cn*faces Tluc ne n 011l_y to thnc �,,.F
vev
1-1
of metal facia 6 inches or les in hei h e of 1
d d xke. use of roofine material r
�g as tt does no � � a �'�"
Ghon as ab ldan '
or hakPc as a wall maters 1 , s a*`slDetti and �c nr �w•a. t, 8
d b low e
MAY 199 1998
mo
-44-.-
TM M -i
Tili
• - • •_. til UTy- - } - • , -11 SS _ !•i • t.- I n - }
=13 TUF=6
• • Mut L_S2 ! .- } . - . • •�- • _ 2 . Win. . nl S.._! -{!..._! ._� Y� -
� .• }l� _C " • _ a. ! �Y •'- .C_- - • - � -. - Wil. -!. S_ C' " -!{ � �. _}_ • • - •
4- T;wl Bell
- _ - yam_ . • � •- .- �!. -• c.S�_ Y_.� ;.:. }.
c... - � - 1. • • ! !..- • . �• • • • __}_ } • • • { ' _ � • {K} ._ .�
I The following ro• Mles are-=hijbited:m" bowstring, dome.
(risexun) maximurn pit&h mdih a "skirted" or flared" lower Wition at a 3:12
(rise:nm) minimum V_iLch is allowed),
The
• • • • .. _} •ul&• • • • • • Yi
{_!
• '
wa
uu
2 s {
r • • •!l •• _ n. .•�
(Figure B-2)
Ga
•
e -
e r
vertical cn*faces Tluc ne n 011l_y to thnc �,,.F
vev
1-1
of metal facia 6 inches or les in hei h e of 1
d d xke. use of roofine material r
�g as tt does no � � a �'�"
Ghon as ab ldan '
or hakPc as a wall maters 1 , s a*`slDetti and �c nr �w•a. t, 8
d b low e
MAY 199 1998
mo
-44-.-
ORDINANCE NO. 98- 0 9
Fi.t Vte+ r&� F*wo
9derta I
�. -um"w*& 0-6omw*
Figure B-3
(d) Site Elements:
EO'l� -•-�� 1 r'��C � ��
No advertising will be allowed on any exposed amenity or facility such as benches
or trash containers.
VA= feasible._ YS_!' lis L " ! Uv2 should • • •y =semed _S • - • - S
site, Use of tree wells. as well as idaptafion a. -rd variations—of-sitine-in ordeT-W
• W3: •n • i..'-•
LigWng is not to be used as a form of advertising or in a manner that draws
considerably more mention to the building or grounds at night than in the day Site
li6fingh all be designed to direct light into thepro eg_rty. It is to avoid any
annoyance to the neighbors from brightness or gam,
a.
MAY 199 1998
-45-
• 0
At
Fi.t Vte+ r&� F*wo
9derta I
�. -um"w*& 0-6omw*
Figure B-3
(d) Site Elements:
EO'l� -•-�� 1 r'��C � ��
No advertising will be allowed on any exposed amenity or facility such as benches
or trash containers.
VA= feasible._ YS_!' lis L " ! Uv2 should • • •y =semed _S • - • - S
site, Use of tree wells. as well as idaptafion a. -rd variations—of-sitine-in ordeT-W
• W3: •n • i..'-•
LigWng is not to be used as a form of advertising or in a manner that draws
considerably more mention to the building or grounds at night than in the day Site
li6fingh all be designed to direct light into thepro eg_rty. It is to avoid any
annoyance to the neighbors from brightness or gam,
a.
MAY 199 1998
-45-
• 0
•
ORDINANCE NO. 98- 0 9
crree m Devices:
"Visually offensive -nis" whether frees anding mounted on roofs or locates
m4yere on a structure. shall be concealed from view on all sides. Inds dual
crrem buildinaglements �p a landscapi*+� are to be use to coma e e v
screen the offensive elemen from view from adjacent roads propemes and natkn
anaac. Parapet walls. visible r^nf etn,rfi,rec individual screens. or bmldm�_elemet tis:
F ♦ed �.;enally nQfensive elPmentS from
shall be used to completel�s- =n ruoi iiivu^u . - -; ___ u - ---c
view from any pgint around _the entire building ;�erymeter Screening devices shall
relate to rhe h»il_ding's style ofarchitecture and materials, All tering d ices shall
pec-;¢t,ed as that no part of the offensive element extends hound the top of the
screen meaci,red yerticall}r f'_�e Fi��B,_A) Roo op sere—:--deylc— shall not be
LcMuiredfor 1Ltnbing roof vents which are less than 4" in diameter and less than 12"
ab-oy-c roof penetration.'"- roof vents are to be located where they will be least
visible from roadways.
We View trot view
0 (Mors & Building Graphics
The followings iildi P its aze prohibited polka dots circles vertical stripes
disand symbols such as lightning bolts.
H owey-m legally reregistered trw1emarks which directly relate to the butld>_ne occupant
(not tmdemarks of =ducts or services sold or displayed) are allowed. subiect to
Mll�ble sign n�olor reg ations
W Color Standar
AA l�uilaings and accessory structures within the SR 60 Corridor shalt he limited to
the following_colors:
1. Base BuildW Colors: Base building colors relate to wall and pamet wall
aTeas and shall be limited to the ^�^*� listed in the SR 60 Corridor Master
Color List These colors consist of white and light neutral colors in the warm
ieVon& uild' colors Secondaryub ilding colors *etarP to larger trim
areas and ;all be limited to the colors listed in the SR 60 Comdor Master
Color List Second= buildina colors shall not exceed 30% of thearea s ce
F a_ny one building facade elevation These colors consist of a mid-
range intensiV of the base building coia*� and romps .mentary c Tors. and
;i,r.liirle all base building colors
MAY 199 1998
0
-46-
_�_fl. • •f� _i_!.L � •i •i -.. • -I • yl _ }lam � _ I
-•i}- •.}� C! __� 1-�I _• ••_ _}.•. ._{- _!_- Vii} I •.� t% .S. •
-,SL- _ ...yam •_• • • • y . �, •-L� ! _ �!• {i' .�•• }
-• 2Y
SK! - � - • .r•{! r - •_�r� .- - ••i}�J !-rte!"1 !_ _�.S'� i'--
761 MOICTI'l mm wimm
iMMA
FAR
.90
•
•1st• •_!.� lr. - _'--- • •!-i •. • _.1L_ %_i}1. _�• Svi
f I" �y., �.!_.I - y{! Sif
•_�•.�!!�_ _.�_ .•" • X3.1 _}! • -. •-yay ic._ r% � ! �! !-- i - - •
Loll ImptL-g
SO WA
• • • •1 • '.
} !{•:J�_.!}_}�2• i!"�J_r- C�}. lit_' • ._}_• !_Cs }•R-: `��-- }i�.f-R! S�• !iR-YY:�-
LOU MR MAW11
• 2
0
ORDINANCE NO. 98- 0 9
131T� �wl T
1 Plastic shall be nan formed facP�
Logos ars �c�
MAY 199 1998
0
U-48- U) I L
iv. Nothing shall be
RdutjdoxL&�
alsidle Fzce of
awn orlgbfiW
9-
PLYM dmg
s
10.
eT or a
etoa"
n
011! ir-
i.
Com,
mat -rials orxEQR=ignL
iffmnt
iv. Sisms Ath diffmnt
Lire.
12.
S-1
mon =stwding. or
roof si ba are also
nobibi d for Ila
ced th
:! 11t I'll _gn_ga
:11: WdQxaim&u
kes,
MAY 199 1998
0
U-48- U) I L
ORDINANCE NO. 98- 0 9
2. latemally illuminated alumimun cabinet with textured finish, -and cut-out ins
muh through a=lic letters, C&te that color MU be =lied to the "first surface"
I Backlit reverse l2an channel letters LoMae fw&M-mou—nted on sign that
hannoniams with the pr_oiects architecture.
!L Siiznagc that relates to the building's W3j-q:-Qf architmare and materials.
5. Thematic
2, Where allowed. changeable copy signs that have a dark MQue back und 6
translucent lettering,
!
Maximum signage on a single &ce, Red al ed
uce to 50% of wlat is low
Table 1. exccZ for 1-95 signs as described in iii. below,
than six (W feet and no ovaer than ten (10) feet, Maximum height and s'
modificationsd• mot APWX to =valies located }_ n one thousand 1 1 1
feet of 'entrance or exit m=s where an-=licant
shalltaller M=sed Sim is orlented so as to be seen by 1-95 motod
the SR 60 intmbange, Any pole for such a sign shall be golored
=
safisfaction of sight distance r-equiren=ts,
x_11 \' •_ \ 1 _1 }- Y{(� 1•}_ \ }._}_�- 1{1 II 1 -
__II �II \ •
2. WalWacade Sims
Maximum sign area allowed: Reduce to 50% of what is allowed in Table 2
LQ Colors:
L The following colors are encouraged for s}g�gg;
Use of earth -tone colors and pastels,
Darker backgrounds with light color Sign cony
MAY 199 1998
•
ORDINANCE NO. 98- 0 9
2. The following colors are prohibited for signage.•
0
bronze. chrome. aluminum. stainless steel. etc...). Colors such as medium or
dark bronze are acceptable and encouraged Polished or weathered true
bronze, brass. or copper metal finishes are acceptable and encouraged.
Precious metal colons ate allowed on sand blasted or carved "wood look"
aw-le Sipes.
I The use of garish colors. such as fluorescent colors. is prohibited.
'ice' , The use of black for signa eQ background. Changeable copy sign= is
excluded from this prohibition,
5177=17A
a
l�1- 1
■%��i l•I:C•.
-. }�•
1 - 1
- ' 1
J}_,
Uq-
S � ., � J
� � � 1
• a_1-1!_�
�
• -
�� S
fid- - .1-
� 1 - :r{r
•.- fir.
Any freestanding signs • y+ri from flat panel matexial. such as high
face.dcuab VglygEffh=, MD -0. sheet metal. or the -like. shall have a distance of
no less than 8" from face to and 1a-. • " enclosed
1. 1 _1- d. • ll 1 :1, to • -
internal fra
2. Freestanding Changeable Copy Signs
3. WalWacade Signage:
The maximum vertical dimension of a facade or wall sign shall not exceed
twenty-five (25) percent of the building height,
used on an awning. the area of lettering -shall -be included in —tbLe-v-4c-.eTt-sFe
!!_moi• of "r sign area.
fiL Lettering. and trim on canop_y faciashall • - considered
signssien and shall be limited to 33% of the facia -area of = one eloration.
Internally illuminated signs shall not be placed on a Qw= gructure. and no
sign shall be placed above the facia on a canopy_ stnxUre.
iv. Wall JIare/ 1 !_1 -1 1!- .i1• 1a sj= less Om 20:12
LdsemM) pitch, Wall si= mounted on a roof shall be enclosed om all sides
to cover the internal frame and -its connection to the roof Also see aC
' Section 956.120)(o).
4, Chanuab-le Copy Wall Signs for Theaters
Theaters may utilize 1W to eighlyM) pmerd of actual sign area for diMlay
of names of films. plays or -ogiff-paformances -curnmfly Ehmming.
MAY 199 1998
-50-
r
LJ
ORDINANCE NO. 98- 0 9
5. lllumination:
• } • - 0.1 '_! • S - !._ -- • !}.} - - - } •
14
• .i.2" 7}�" ai -{._ �-}. ;� • .!}•�.-_ limos-Y.c.JUMYa} 1,._ •- --}_}K-
- =-}-
1s2'L% -_I i i.�.11 . Ly }�� • • _}_ - . - • } } • .! • _ _I 7h�•}.. r{_ • i . } - } • _� �_
• _i. • 1. It _Sii - ' J " • - � - N.M. - :_! • } •_lf. � ! • - • . - •
Nonconforming liens or nonconforming sign structures on sites abandoned
for 12 or more consecutive months shall not be pemitted for reuse.
iL Except as otherwise provided herein. there may be a change of tenancy or
ownership of a nonconforming sip— without the loss of nonconforming
status, if the site is not abandoned for 12 or more consecutive months.
Colors of a nonconforming sign shall not be changed from those existing at
the time of the adoption of this Code unless iiew colors comply with the SR
60 Corridor special color requirements.
v A nonconforming sign shall not be enlggcd or increased in any way from its
lawful size at the time of the adoption of these special remdations.
• • } • �.} •}_ � sum.--_�y-}�- • •_!!}.- • - •'-Y. i• �•
�•i}�� " -- ••871145-11s_ • �' .•Y • • �• }•} •� • }
;_!- - •_ !. •1!. �_'_ •}_••_ .fes- • .1" :Y-- -•
• a_ � =__ } i• - - - • � :Sf �_ - .e - • . - • YJJ},} i Yom. S_!l� • i.
Ro•_n and _a! R! •.! }lila.. =airs • ! maintmmce mU be madc= } • -
the cost of such =airs andLor maintenance made during = two (2) ycar pcdod
shall not exceed fift (50) Rment of the =lacement cost of the sign Lt the end of
the } •c•
I Reconstruction After Catastrophe: If any nonconforming sign is damaged by fire
floocL explosion, collaps wind. war or other catastrophe to such an extent that the
cost of repair and reconstruction will exceed fiftv(50) percent of the replacement
cost at the time of damage it shall not be used or reconstructed except in full
confomity with the provisions of these special regulations..
UU Screening of Accessory Features
W Screening of Chain Link Fencing
}1•.!!_ Y_ 1. �} J_' _ • '1 R: }• •.�• 1. _ •- !1 • 7-. J • }1... , y
MAY 199 1998
-51-
0
•
ORDINANCE NO. 98-09
jZ Project related Median Alterations
1187=9 74 -ma TIT,
LW Underground Utilities Services Required
Lei Rffiew of Development Pruie=ts by Task Force Members
Persons who served on the SR 60 Corridor Plan Task Force or other Board -appointed
ci&ms and volunteeringdesign professionals shall be id en the on gigmity to provide iw_ A
into the normal site plan review and approval process that will be followed by applicants�f
UrQr jects within the corridor, To ensure that =per input is given the following Ms will
be taken:
Thy Board ! • _.a . • m_ y • ne_!, shall s_. , } }d n _-}. J.. of _ask _
and design Mfqltonals (W to 4 pmons knomm as the "SR 60 on-going rm&w
force") to serve as voluntm for ELy-ig-min and gammmfM� Wm for NWC=
Technical Rodew Committm meetings at which =jects within ft comidow pl
area are scheduled for review.
Group memben shal-have the oMdunity to attend the meeting and =3jde
conm2c= to the Wficant along with staff comments,_l• . IL c.mmic
shall pertain to- site plan cgmWlame with cojaid-or plan requimmcW&
Ld) Planning staff shall ngf& gmjM mem—bem of devel= =onses to my comments
will be =ented. along with staffs recommendadom to the PlamlWg and Zoming
U-51 Major, Minor, Administmilve Site Plan Approval
Non -Conformities
1 . ! • • �_ }_! _! " -t • 1 • • • _ • , .� - • • 1 T { ! 15791191-0-M
Iw.-Mam-r.
} . 1 1 - } • }.a{+ � .. � 1 - } i }�:JS� _ }_.'._ li } 1_ • -11.5
MAY 199 1998
Continuance of Nonconforming�ProWprt : A nonconformingbe
continued. subject to the following provisions•
-52-
EC' :, Fl;c lei
-
•• .}•
• 1_{:_ .,�
.ice" y•.�. __ S"��.t•1
s 4C!!
s 1" l.} .1 !•� _ .}!/ �L !"
1 . ! • • �_ }_! _! " -t • 1 • • • _ • , .� - • • 1 T { ! 15791191-0-M
Iw.-Mam-r.
} . 1 1 - } • }.a{+ � .. � 1 - } i }�:JS� _ }_.'._ li } 1_ • -11.5
MAY 199 1998
Continuance of Nonconforming�ProWprt : A nonconformingbe
continued. subject to the following provisions•
-52-
EC' :, Fl;c lei
ORDINANCE NO. 98- 0 9
1 Use of nonconforming structures abandoned for a nedod of 12 or more
consecutive months (cross-reference LDR section 904.081 located on a
nonconforming.propertv shall not be permitted until the pr-02erty_ is br_ou�l ti
into compliance with the requirements of a c-) - atible grope V
3 Except as otherwise provided herein there may be a change of tenancy or
ownership of a nonconforminQprop=without the loss of nonconformms
status if use of the nonconformLne structures is not abandoned for a period
of 12 or ve months.
3 , Colors of a structure located on a nonconformine P== shall not be
changed from those existing at the time of the adoption of these-
regulations.
hesereg ,lationa unless the new to -be -painted colors comply with the SR 60
special color regulations
its for mofs ox minor =airs) shall quired
5. A stntcture located on a nonconforming nropertv__ &a1 not be enlar&dor
increased in any way from its lawful size at the_time of the adoption of these
spe. dal redations Where such changes are made a building nernnit and
compliance with the requirements of a "compatible pmp" are reaurzed
for the enlargement or addition
U• Variances
Lal Variances from these special corridor reprulations shall be processed pursuant to the
=Ceuures and timeframes of Section 70,001. Florida Statutes The Plannme and
Zonin Commission shall recommend variances to the Board of County
Commissioners for final action
The planning and Zoning Commission is te settlements of claims
under Chapter 70. Florida Statutes. through M means set out in Section
70.001(41(4
The Planning and Zoning Commis. on shall • . :_ or • Mpgsal for relief unless it finds the follo-yAng:
=
L The corridor rem ,lation directlyrestricts or limits the use of real proneriv
such that the proms=rtv owner i�nerm noft unable to attain the reasonable
investment backed expectation for the existing use of the real property or a
vested riaht to a specific use of the real prorty with resnect to the real
propg as a whole: or
That •. a owner is left with existing or vested _
in fairness should be borne by the nublic at-livAt--od
3, The relief granted proT_ cg is the public interest served by the reeulations at
issue and is the appropriate relief necessary to prevent the comdor
regulations from inordinately burdening the real_propertv
11. REPEAL OF CONFLICTING PROVISIONS
All previous ordinances, resolutions, or motions of the Board of County Commissioners of Indian
River County, Florida which conflict with the provisions of this ordinance are hereby repealed to the
extent of such conflict. All Special Acts of the legislature applying only to the unincorporated
portion of Indian River County which conflict with the provisions of this ordinance are hereby
repealed to the extent of such conflict.
12. CODIFICATION
The provisions of this ordinance shall be incorporated into the County Code and the word
"Ordinance" may be changed to "section', "article", or other appropriate word, and the sections of
this ordinance may be renumbered or relettered to accomplish such intentions.
MAY 199 1998
-53-
0 0
•
ORDINANCE NO. 98- 0 9
13. SEVERABILITY
If any section, part of a sentence, paragraph, phrase or word of this ordinance is for any reason held
to be unconstitutional, inoperative or void, such holdings shall not affect the remaining portions
hereof and it shall be construed to have been the legislative intent to pass this ordinance without such
unconstitutional, invalid or inoperative part.
14. EFFECTIVE DATE
The provisions of this ordinance shall become effective upon filing with the Department of State.
Approved and adopted by the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida on
this 19 day of M a v
1998.
This ordinance was advertised in the Vero Beach Press -Journal on the 2 4 day of A p r i 1
1998, and on the day of , 1998, for public hearings to be held on the
4_ day of M a v
,1998, and on the 1q_ day of May ,1998 at which
time at the final hearing it was moved for adoption by Commissioner Eggert
G
seconded by Commissioner and adopted by the following vote;
Sections 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 9, and 10 of the ordinance were adopted by a vote of :
Chairman John W. Tippin Ay e
Vice Chairman Kenneth R. Macht Aye
Commissioner Fran B. Adams Aye
Commissioner Carolyn K. Eggert Aye
Commissioner Caroline D. Ginn A v P
Section 3 of the ordinance was adopted by a vote of :
Chairman John W. Tippin ---LLL-
Vice
Ay e
Vice Chairman Kenneth R. Macht
Aye
Commissioner Fran B. Adams
Aye
Commissioner Carolyn K. Eggert A y e
Commissioner Caroline D. Ginn N a
Section 5 of the ordinance was adopted by a vote of :
Chairman John W. Tippin A y e
Vice Chairman Kenneth R. Macht N a v
Commissioner Fran B. Adams
Aye
Commissioner Carolyn K. Eggert
Aye
Commissioner Caroline D. Ginn --la y
MAY 199 1998
-54-
E011h
is
E'lJ.... � e•J r:�.Ct
ORDINANCE NO. 98- 0 9
Section 7 of the ordinance was adopted by a vote of :
Chairman John W. Tippin A y P
Vice Chairman Kenneth R. Macht Aye
Commissioner Fran B. Adams A y e
Commissioner Carolyn K. Eggert Aye
Commissioner Caroline D. Ginn N a y
The majority having voted approval, the ordinance was adopted.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
John W. Tippin,
ATTEST BY:
Jeffrey-i)Barton, Clerk,---').
Acknowledgment by the Department of State of the State of Florida this2 6 "t day of
May , 1998.
Effective Date: Filed with the Department of State on the 2 6 t day of May , 1998.
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM
William G. Collins
Deputy County Attorney
APPROVED AS TO PLANNING MATTERS
Robert . Keating, Al P /
Community Development D' ctof,
MAY 199 1998
-54-(a)
0 0
v
F�+
00
NATRIS FOUND IN SECTION 911.03
RELATIONSHIP OF THE ZONING DISTRICTS WITH MI FUTURE LAND USE MAP nESIGNATIONS
Land Use Designation
MEMO
0
�mmmmmmammmm������
�.■■■■�v■mom■�s�s��
�■■■�■o.vv■■moo■oma
mommommommommoomms
CIMMONEIMENNOMMAIMa�o�i
Coding: Words in blocked -out type are deletions from existing law. Words Underlined are additions.
1
0
0
•
FRI
00
l
z
�cz:)
no=
wo
IN-
MIN IN
NOON
MIN
MEN
No IM
NNE No
mmmm-v
�s
aMlmMINION
0
MINIM
IMMMIMIMMIN
MM
IM
IMONE
M�Mlmmm
No
MENo
mm��
ON
IM■mss
mmi
vMmm
l
z
�cz:)
Zoning
District
C-1
Con -1
%
Con -2
-
Con -3
CRVP
R-BCID
Rose -4
-
AIR -I
-
FD
--
RMOMMOMMOMMMM �N,
MOMMEMMOMEMMEMMM
SMEMEMMOMMOMEMMM
MMEMEMMOMMOMEMMM
MsMMMsMMMssMssMs
MMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM
MMEMEMMMOMMMEMMM
MMMMMMMMMMMMMM�o
X - District permitted
T - District permitted when used as transition from less intense/dense development or consistent with
existing development
-- - District not permitted
1 Only within development where airstrips existed prior to February 13, 1990.
3 Only within the Roseland area of the county.
(Ord. No. 90-16, 5 1, 9-11-90; Ord. No. 91-7, S 4, 2-27-91; Ord. No. 91-48, 5 9, 12-4-91)
u\c\s\ldr\91 I ludab
Coding: Words in blocked -out type are deletions from existing law. Words jUjderiined are additions.
3
r�
•
C..-) 0
C>,
ORDINANCE NO. 98- 0 9
Typical Foundation Plantings Plans
(Buildings up to 12')
Commercial
Building
k
5' width (typ.)
upro
Example:
12' building height - 50' each side
less r for 1 door opening. 40%. x 42' _
17 lineal feet of foundation planting
required along this building face which
includes 2 palm trees, l understory
tree and the required shrubs.
FIGURE F-7
MAY 199 1998
-05
-58-
0 is
ORDINANCE NO. 98-_L9-
Typical
8- 9
Typical Foundation Plantings Plans
(Buildings 12'- 25')
><
10' width (typ.)
I
Example:
25' building height • 50' each side less
16' for loading door. 40% x 34' =14
lineal feet of foundation planting required
along this face which includes 2 canopy
trees, i understory tree and the required
shrubs (some palms are shown as
possible substitution for canopy trees).
FIGURE F-8
MAY 199 1998
Ct 7
-59- L���t� 11 U3
ORDINANCE NO. 98- 0 9
Typical Foundation Plantings Plans
(Buildings 251- 351)
15' width (typ•)
Example:
35' budding height - 50' each side less
16' for loading door. 40% x 34' a 14
lineal feet of foundation planting required
along this face which Includes3 canopy
trees, 2 understory trees and the required
shrubs (some palms are shown as possible
substitution for canopy trees).
FIGURE F-9
MAY 199 1998
E 0'J z.1 lwk A ��
-60-
0 0
ORDINANCE NO. 98- 0 9
Alternative Foundation Planting Plan
(building with drive-thru or loading areas)
Where required foundation plantings can not be
Installed adjacent to the building face, they may be
placed away from the building in a planting area
which would provide the same general effect
FIGURE F-10
MAY 199 1998
-61-
FACIA HETI
COL
MAY 199 1998
ORDINANCE NO. 98- 0 9
Roof Slope & Facia Height
FIGURE F-11
l y�
-62-
• 0
•
ORDINANCE NO. 98- 0 9
Lighting Orientation & Shielding
90°
7 PERPENDICULAR
MAY 199 1998
m
\\
� OBTUSE
�
,ANGUE
LIGHT SOURCE RECESSED
INTO BOX FIXTURE / CANOPY
. . ........ ..
..........
.........
. ..........
........ .
. ........
.......... x:..
.. ..... .... .........
.... ..........
LENS BELOW
BOX // CAANOPY
N
FIGURE F-12
-63-
0
Er'
JL.\
WALLPACK
WITH OPAQUE
SAIELD
MAY 199 1998
ORDINANCE NO. 98- 0 9
FIGURE F-13
-64-
WALL PACK
WITHOUT
SHIELD
NO
9.C.1. PUBLIC NOTICE ITEMS - PUBLIC HEARING
SCHEDULED FOR MAY 26,1998: AN ORDINANCE OF
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY. FLORIDA, CHANGING THE
NAME OF THE "COLORED SCHOOL SUBDIVISION"
TO THE "DOUGLAS SUBDIVISION"
The Chairman announced that a public hearing has been scheduled for May 26, 1998
for an Ordinance changing the name of the "Colored School Subdivision" to the "Douglas
Subdivision".
No action required or taken.
9.C.2. PUBLIC NOTICE ITEMS - PUBLIC HEARING
SCHEDULED FOR JUNE 2,1998: AN ORDINANCE OF
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA. AMENDING
CHAPTER 306 OF THE CODE, MISCELLANEOUS
OFFENSES AND PROGRAMS, BY ADOPTING SECTION
306.12 "USE OF AIRBOATS IN THE ST. SEBASTIAN
RIVER"
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of May 12, 1998:
TO: Board of County Commissioners
FROM: k`f William G. Collins II - Deputy County Attorney
DATE: May 12, 1998
SUBJECT: Notice of Public Hearing on Ordinance Prohibiting Airboats on the
St. Sebastian River Scheduled for June 2, 1998 - LEGISLATIVE
The attached ordinance has been scheduled for public hearing on June 2, 1998.
No action required or taken.
MAY 199 1998
-65-
E1021" 1,�.05 PAGE 617
10. TEAMSTERS LOCAL UNION NO. 769 CONTRACT (BLUE
COLLAR WORKERS - ROAD & BRIDGE. PARKS, BUILDING &
GROUNDS AND UTILITIES DEPARTMENTS)
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of May 8, 1998:
TO:
Board of County Commissioners
DATE:
May 8, 1998
SUBJECT:
Teamsters Contract
FROM:
James E. Chandler
County Administrator
Attached for the Board's consideration is the recommended collective bargaining
agreement with Teamsters Local Union No. 769.
The proposed agreement is for two years, effective October 1, 1998. As reflected in
Article 33, Section 2, a 3% cost of living increase is provided each fiscal year of the contract
period. There are no other proposed changes from the provisions contained in the current
agreement.
The bargaining unit employees have ratified the proposed agreement.
I believe the agreement for a two year period is equitable, and recommend approval.
County Administrator Chandler recommended the contract which has been ratified
by the Teamsters. This is a 2 -year agreement with the only change being an annual across-
the-board 3% increase for each of the 2 years.
Commissioner Ginn noted that on Page 120 of the backup, it states that when an
employee is absent from work for 3 days with no notice to the County that is considered an
abandoned position. Those employees retain a right to grieve and she asked Administrator
Chandler to look into that clause for the next renewal.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert,
SECONDED by Commissioner Adams, the Board
unanimously approved the Contract between Indian
River County and Teamsters Local Union No. 769,
as recommended by staff.
CONTRACT IS ON FILE IN THE OFFICE
OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
MAY 199 1998
-66-
0 0
11.B. DEVELOPMENT OF A LOCAL MITIGATION
STRATEGY - CONTRACTUAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
NO. 98 -LM -4H-1040-01-031 - FLORIDA DEPARTMENT
OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS (DCA),
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of May 11, 1998:
TO: 'Honorable Board of County Commissioners
THROUGH: Jim Chandler, County Administrator
FROM: Doug Wright, Director
Emergency Services
DATE: May 11, 1998
SUBJECT: Contractual Services Agreement No. 98-LM4H-1040-01-031 Between the Florida
Department of Community Affairs and Indian River County to Develop a Local
Mitigation Strategy
The Florida Department of Community Affairs recently informed the County that it, and its
municipalities, were eligible to receive funds in the amount of $105,000 to complete a single,
unified Local Mitigation Strategy. As part of the total amount listed above, $50,000 has been
set aside to assist the County with the completion of planning and vulnerability assessment
activities with the goal of breaking the costly cycle of recovery and rebuilding after a disaster
occurs.
The remaining funds will be divided among the five municipalities in the County. In addition,
per DCA, the County will receive 10 percent (10%) of the amount awarded each municipality
that enters into a subcontract agreement with the County to complete a unified Local Mitigation
Strategy. This additional funding will help account for administrative activities such as
coordinating municipal mitigation strategy efforts associated with the initiative.
The Department of Community Affairs determined the amount and how the funds are to be
divided among municipalities in the County. The DCA advised that all funding amounts were
individually calculated to match the vulnerability of each city and county in terms of repetitive
loss, population, risk and mutual aid participation. The funding as allocated by DCA is as
follows:
Fellsmere
$ 7,500
Indian River Shores
$ 15,000
Orchid
$ 2,500
Sebastian
$ 15,000
Vero Beach
$ 15,000
Unincorporated
$50,000
TOTAL AWARD $105,000
The total award listed above will be committed through the contract between the Department of
Community Affairs and the County which is before the Board at this time. As a condition of
accepting the award, the County is asked to subcontract the identified municipal awards to each
respective municipality. The final deliverable of all contracts will be the development of a single
unified mitigation strategy.
A Working Group is in the process of being formed and each municipality has received a letter
requesting that the appropriate individual(s) be designated to participate in the Working Group.
A meeting has been scheduled for May 20, 1998, for organizational purposes and to ascertain
if the municipalities plan to sub -contract with the County in this endeavor.
MAY 199 1998
-67- f
as s
E 0�'K �1�C
EO,1";
Should any municipality decide to decline funding for this initiative, the County will receive 50
percent (50%) of the amount calculated for that municipality to complete a general assessment
of vulnerabilities within that municipal area. The remaining 50 percent (50%) of the calculated
amount will be retained by the State to fund additional mitigation planning activities statewide.
Allocation and proposed expenditure of the funding identified for Indian River County will be
brought back to the Board for review and consideration at a later date.
RECOWKENDATION:
Staff recommends Board approval of Contractual Services Agreement No. 98 -LM -4H-1040-01-
031 between the Department of Community Affairs and Indian River County for the
development of a Local Mitigation Strategy for the County. All subcontracts with the
municipalities will be returned to the Board for review and consideration.
Emergency Services Director Doug Wright explained this is a program to identify any
problems in advance of a disaster to put the County in a position to obtain post -disaster
funding and to enable faster recovery from such a disaster.
Commissioner Ginn questioned how members are to be chosen for the working group,
and Director Wright stated that he has written to each municipality asking them to suggest
appropriate members.
Commissioner Eggert questioned whether interested citizens should contact Director
Wright and he responded in the affirmative.
Commissioner Ginn commented that the Regional Planning Council had a very nice
presentation regarding this program.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert,
SECONDED by Commissioner Ginn, the Board
unanimously approved the Contractual Services
Agreement No. 98 -LM -4H-1040-01-031 with the
Department of Community Affairs for the
development of a Local Mitigation Strategy, with the
understanding that subcontracts with all
municipalities will be returned to the Board for
review and consideration, as recommended by staff.
EXECUTED COPY OF AGREEMENT IS ON FILE IN THE OFFICE
MAY 199 1998
OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
-68-
i
11.G. INDIAN RIVER STORMWATER IMPROVEMENTS -
ENGINEERING CONSULTANT SELECTION - CARTER
& ASSOCIATES
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of May 11, 1998:
TO: James E. Chandler,
County Administrator
FROM: James W. Davis, P.E.,
Public Works Director
SUBJECT: Engineering Consultant Selection -
Indian River County Stormwater Improvements
DATE: May 11, 1998
On Thursday, May 7, 1998, the Selection Committee appointed to
recommend an engineering consultant for the subject project (Roger
Cain, P.E., County Engineer, Dave Cox, P.E., Drainage Engineer and
Jim Davis, P.E. Public Works Director) received presentations from
short-listed consultants.
As a result of the committee's investigation, the following
prioritized short-list is recommended for Board approval:
1 Carter Associates, Inc., Vero Beach
2 Lindahl, Browning, Ferrari & Helstrom, Inc.,
Ft. Pierce
3 Williams, Hatfield, & Stoner, Inc.
Port St. Lucie, FL.
Staff recommends authorization to proceed in contract negotiations
with the top ranked firm, Carter & Associates, Inc. of Vero Beach
MAY 19, 1998
ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert,
SECONDED by Commissioner Adams, the Board
unanimously authorized staff to proceed in contract
negotiations with Carter & Associates, Inc. of Vero
Beach, as recommended by staff.
•
i� � y
�,:� -�.
_I
11.H.1. WEST MEADOWS SUBDIVISION- WATER
ASSESSMENT PROJECT - FINAL PAYMENT REQUEST
- TREASURE COAST CONTRACTING
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of May 11, 1998:
DATE:
May 11, 1998
TO:
JAMES E. CHANDLER
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
FROM:
DONALD R. HUBBS,
DIRECTOR OF UTILITY StNVICES
PREPARED AND
ROBERT O. WISEMEN, P.E. Q61I�
STAFFED BY:
ENVIRONMENTAL ENG
SUBJECT: WEST MEADOWS SUBDIVISION, WATER ASSESSMENT
PROJECT, FINAL PAYMENT REQUEST, IRC PROJECT NO.
UW -97 -05 -DS
BACKGROUND
On December 23, 1997, the Board of County Commissioners granted a contract to Treasure
Coast Contracting, Inc., in the amount of $50,421.10, (See attached agenda item and minutes) to
construct the above -referenced project. The work is complete and has been accepted by the
County. Tike contractor has submitted his final payment request.
ANALYSIS
The project has been accepted by the County and cleared by FDEP for services. The Contractor
has submitted the final payment in the amount of $10,778.02. Below is an explanation of the the
payments previously made to the Contractor.
Original contract amount $50,421.10
Change Order No.1 145.64
Amount Previously Paid to Contractor 39.788.73
Balance Remaining $10.778.01
RECOMMENDATION
The staff of the Department of Utility Services recommends that the Board of County
Commissioners approve Change Order No. 1 in the amount of $145.64 and the final payment
request in the amount of $10,778.01 from Treasure Coast Contracting, as presented and authorize
Chairman to execute same.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert,
SECONDED by Commissioner Ginn, the Board
unanimously approved Change Order No. 1 in the
amount of $145.64 and the final payments'request in
the amount of $10,778.01 from Treasure Coast
Contracting and authorized the Chairman to execute
same, as recommended by staff.
DOCUMENTS WILL BE ON FILE IN THE OFFICE
OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
WHEN EXECUTED AND RECEIVED
MAY 199 1998
1P 0
11.H.2. LAURELWOOD WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT
DEMOLITION - KIMMMS CONTRACTING CORP.
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of May 11, 1998:
DATE: May 11, 1998
TO: JAMES E. CHANDLER
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
FROM: DONALD R. HUBBS, P.E.—
DIRECTOR
.E —DIRECTOR OF UTILITY SERVICES
PREPARED AND ROBERT O. WISEMEN, P. .
STAFFED BY: ENVIRONMENTAL ENG
SUBJECT: LAURELWOOD WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT
DEMOLITION, INDIAN RIVER COUNTY PROJECT NO. US -
96 -03 -CS
On February 10, 1998, the Board of County Commissioners awarded a contract with Kimmins
Contracting Corporation in the amount of $14,325.00, for the above -referenced project (See
attached agenda item and minutes). The work is complete and was verbally accepted by Mr.
Peter Robinson of the Laurels, Inc., on May 5, 1998 and the County. The contractor has
submitted a payment request in the full amount.
The staff of the Department of Utility Services recommends that the Board of County
Commissioners approve the payment request from Kimmins Contracting Corporation in the
amount of $14,325.00, as presented and authorize Chairman to execute same.
MAY 199 1998
ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert,
SECONDED by Commissioner Ginn, the Board
unanimously approved the payment request from
Kimmins Contracting Corporation in the amount of
$14,325 and authorized the Chairman to execute
same, as recommended by staff.
DOCUMENTS ARE ON FILE IN THE OFFICE
OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
-71-
0
ar'�
1 LHA PARK PLACE CONSTRUCTION FINALIZATION
COMMITMENT - PROPOSED DEVELOPER'S
AGREEMENT - WILLIAM SCHULKE - HYATT
PROPERTY - BARBER STREET TRADE CENTER
SUBDIVISION
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of May 11, 1998 and a letter of August 19,1996:
DATE: May 11, 1998
TO: JAMES E. CHANDLER
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
FROM: DONALD R. HUBBS, P.E. \ *
DIRECTOR OF UTILITY SEMVICES
PREPARED- WILLIAM F. MC
AND STAFFED CAPITAL PRO ENGINEER
BY: DEPAR ITY SERVICES
SUBJECT: PARK PLACE CONSTUCTION FINALIZATION CONA4ITMENT BY
COUNTY, PROPOSED DEVELOPER'S AGREEMENT BETWEEN
WILLIAM SCHULKE & INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
On July 11, 1989, the Board of County Commissioners approved the purchase of Park Place
Utilities. (See attached copy of purchase agreement) As part of the North County Sewer System
construction, an easement was necessitated from the owner of Park Place for the construction of
an 8" force main on Barber Street west of U.S. Highway One (See attached map). In exchange
for the easement, the Utilities Department took the unusual step of committing to provide a
future sewer connection to three (3) properties owned by the Park. (Please refer to the attached
map and related correspondence)
The first property is provided with service using an upgraded lift station on the property and was
completed during the constriction of the North County Sewer System. The remaining two
properties were left without service at that time, not knowing what development would occur on
these tracts. The northern most tract has been purchased by William Schulke and will connect
through the adjacent mobile home park (Please see attached map in Developer' Agreement).
In order to fulfill the Department's commitment, a Developer's Agreement is proposed to fund
the County's portion of the construction. A copy of the proposed Developer's Agreement is
attached for reference. The execution of the attached agreement will complete the County's
commitment for service agreed to during easement acquisition.
The total project construction cost is $25,267.95. The portion to be funded by the County is
estimated at $17,959.35. A comparison of providing service using a lift station, an individual
gravity collection system and the proposed dual gravity/lateral construction, indicates that the
proposed design is the least expensive alternative to fulfill the County's obligation.
Attached for reference is the associated correspondence for this project. The funding for this
project will be from the impact fee fund.
On May 1, 1998, Utility staff and the County Attorney met with Mr. Nelson Hyatt, who offered
to take back the subject easement if the County was unwilling to fulfill its obligation.
MAY 199 1998
Options:
1. To honor the County's implied promise of gravity sewer service, as per the
attached August 19, 1996 letter and execute the Developer's Agreement as
attached.
2. Return the easement to the property owner and allow developer to serve
the subject property at his cost.
The Department of Utility Services recommends that the Board of County Commissioners
approve Option No. 1, To honor the County's implied promise of gravity sewer service. as per
the attached August 19, 1996 letter and execute the Developer's Agreement as attached, and
authorize Chairmanto execute same.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
DEPARTMENT OF UTILITYSER VICES
1840 25th Stat, Vero Beach, Florida 32960
FAX (407) 7745143
August 19, 1996
Mr. Joseph Schulke
P.O. Box 831
Wabasso, FL 32970
SUBJECT: HYATT PROPERTY - SEWER CONNECTION FOR THE ABANDONED PARK
PLACE WASTEWATER TREATMENT SITE
Dear Mr. Schulke:
This letter shall serve as confirmation of my understanding of our
past discussions regarding sewer connectiorx to the above -referenced
site. In summary, we have discussed the following:
o Indian River County has contractual obligations with Nelson
Hyatt o provide a sewer connection to the above -referenced
site, and the tract of land lying south of Barber Street and
south of the subject site.
o Indian River County Utility Department has agreed to provide
sewer connections to the subject site and the tract of land
lying south of the subject site by the following means:
At the time Nelson Hyatt r -.r any future owner commences
the development of the subject site, Indian River County
Utilities Department will propose to the Board of County
Commissioners to enter int_ a Developer's Agreement with
the owner, in which the developer/owner will design,
permit and construct a sewer connection substantially
similar to the connection depicted in the record as -built
plans by Masteller and Moler, Indian River County Project
US87-27CCS, plans dated 7/13/90 and the County will
reimburse the developer/owner upon completion and
acceptance by the Utilities Department those costs
associated with the design, permitting and construction
of those facilities.
Indian River will also enter into a similar Devo-loper,s
Agreement for the extension of a sewer lateral from the
subject sites developer built on-site sewer collection
system, across Barber Street, to the tract of land lying
south of the subject site.
MAY 199 1998
-73-' i � �--, R
EC '; � � FADE ,,`'
r 1�
—0 F.�CE ti�
The approval of the above -referenced Developer's Agreements will be
fully supported by the Utilities Department Administration, but
will be subject to the approval of the Indian River County Board of
County Commissioners.
If you have any questions or need any additional information,
please do not hesitate to call me at 770-5325.
Sincerely,
�� vcz��
Bill McCain, P.E.
Capital Projects Engineer
ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert,
SECONDED by Commissioner Adams, the Board
unanimously approved Option No. 1 to honor the
County's implied promise of gravity sewer service as
per the August 19, 1996 letter and authorized the
Chairman to execute the Developer's Agreement
with William Schulke, as recommended by staff.
AGREEMENT IS ON FILE IN THE OFFICE
OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
11.HA 1291H STREET PETITION WATER SERVICE - FINAL
PAY REQUEST AND CHANGE ORDER - TREASURE
COAST CONTRACTING
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of May 11, 1998:
DATE: MAY 11, 1998
TO: JAMES E. CHANDLER
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
FROM: DONALD R. HUBBS, P.E�
DIRECTOR OF UTILITY SERVICES
PREPARED WILLIAM F. MCCAIN, P
AND STAFFED CAPITAL PROJECTS
BY:
SUBJECT: PETITION FOR WATER SERVICE - 129T" STREET
FINAL PAY REQUEST AND CHANGE ORDER
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY PROJECT NO. UW -96 -05 -DS
BACKGROUND
In May of 1997, the Board of County Commissioners approved Resolution III, at
a public hearing for the above -referenced project. (Please reference the
attached agenda item and minutes). On December 16, 1997, the Board approved
a contract for construction with Treasure Coast Contracting, Inc., in the
amount of $59,929.90. (See attached agenda_,item and minutes).
MAY 199 1998
-74-
go 0
11
ANALYSIS
Construction of this assessment project is now complete. Substantial
completion was achieved on March 27, 1998, with connections to customers
beginning approximately two weeks later. A final walk through was conducted
on May 7, 1998 and the project was finalized. Change Order No. 1 (final) is
for a contract reduction of $93.48, which equates to a final contract amount
of $59,836.42. The final reconciliation change order is attached for
detailed review and consists mainly of minor material, quantity and service
changes as a result of minor rerouting of the line during construction. The
final pay request in the amount of $12,335.84 is also attached for review and
approval.
Resolution No. IV, indicating the final dollar amounts to be assessed to
individual customers will follow shortly. Upon Board of County
Commissioners' approval, the final letters will be mailed out to all
customers within this project.
RECOMMENDATION
The staff of the Department of Utility Services recommends that the Board of
County Commissioners approve and authorize the Chairman to execute the final
pay request and change order to Treasure Coast Contracting, Inc. as
presented.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert,
SECONDED by Commissioner Ginn, the Board
unanimously approved the final pay request and
change order of Treasure Coast Contracting, Inc. and
authorized the Chairman to execute same, as
recommended by staff.
DOCUMENTS ARE ON FILE IN THE OFFICE
OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
13.B. VICE CHAIRMAN MACHT - LOST TREE ISLAND
(LAAC - ENVIRONMENTAL LAM PURCHASE -
COMMENTS
Vice Chairman Macht read from the following statement:
MAY 199 1998
•
yy r Y,�, •. �;f`pi
-75-
Zai I AGE �hr
MEMORANDUM
TO: Chairman, Board of County Commissioners
FROM: Kenneth R. Macht, Vice Chairman
DATE: May 19, 1998
SUBJECT: Lost Tree Islands
1. As it now is, in accordance with Commissioner Eggert's motion, the citizens of
Indian River County will pay Lost Tree Village Corporation at least $10,500,000.00
for the river islands. The motion included the stratagem of divulging the official
appraisals,if necessary, so that the state matching grant offer would be withdrawn.
This would remove the necessity for a super majority passage of the purchase
agreement, thus costing the taxpayer an additional $2,300,000.00. Lost Tree Village
Corporation has counter offered at $11,900,000 or $11,000,000.00 if the FCT
withdraws the grant offer. This implies a figure in between.
2. Her justification for this measure is, in part, that "The Lost Tree has been
generous to this community in the past". If that is so they have been amply
recompensed and this ill conceived action will return much more. The criteria for
environmental land purchase is simply to buy lands of environmental significance
from a willing seller at or below the appraised value. Contributions to eleemosynary
organizations are not a factor.
3. Many persist in the fiction that a promise was made to purchase the islands. No
such promise was or could be made. Only the promise to negotiate to arrive at a fair
price. There are two very desirable properties known as Lowenstein-Salama on
which negotiations have become dormant because of unreasonable price demands
from the owner. Where is the demand to purchase them at any price? If some
persons or groups, with agendas of their own, have used official printed material to
imply guarantees of purchase they are guilty of�gross misrepresentation. Any
representations made by the Nature Conservancy were made outside any
authorization of county government. Even so, no promises of any kind were
expressed.
4. Several persons, with no qualifications or specific or comprehensive knowledge
of the development requirements for the islands, have made very positive
statements to the effect that the value determined by three independent appraisers
is too low. They mostly base their opinions on the values obtained by sites on
Barker Island, now called Gem Island. This comparison is not valid in any respect.
Gem island is a John's Island community with the added value of golf and social
association that adds greatly to the investment value of a home site. Any
development on the islands in question would only be a development of the Lost
Tree Corporation. Access to the development would not be through a controlled
gate at A1A but at the end of a residential street of modest homes.
5. In the course of Last Tuesday's meeting and the special meeting of the Vero
Beach City Council, several stated that the citizens of the city and county want the
islands purchased and are willing to pay whatever is necessary. Councilman
Grosset said,"I'm here today ladies and gentlemen to speak, not only for the citizens
of Vero Beach but for all the people,all the people, of this county who voted for the
land acquisition bond referendum back in 1992". 1 don't think he or anyone can
speak for all the people. The people can speak for themselves through a plebiscite.
It would be very cynical to assert that the persons who appeared at Tuesday's
meeting represented the generality of county citizens or that their concern was
primarily environmental. It was obvious that their concern was the potential traffic
that would result from development. We haven't heard from any significant
representation of citizens from the mainland or south barrier island. We haven't
heard from citizens who support the purchase of environmental lands and do not
wish to see funds for doing so squandered in this ill advised giveaway to the Lost
Tree Village Corporation.
MAY 199 1998
Last Tuesday's action was not an example of good government. The county's
committee system was bypassed and Commissioner EggerNs motion was made
before a partisan gallery. It was made without representative public input and made
under an agenda item that was specific to finance. There was no time or no reason
for any constructive discussion by dissenting individuals or groups. It may even be
unlawful.
In light of the foregoing and other considerations, I believe that the proper solution
to the matter is a plebiscite. Under state law the citizens of Indian River County may
speak for themselves through a referendum as to whether they wish to pay more
than.the appraised value of the islands or, perhaps if the wish to buy them at all.
The first opportunity for a plebiscite is in the fall and ample time thus provided for all
to express their opinions, not just a special interest group. The Board of
Commissioners has relied on referenda in the past and should have no difficulty in
doing so now.
MOTION WAS MADE by Vice Chairman Macht,
SECONDED by Commissioner Adams, that the
Board advance the final approval of any purchase
agreement regarding the Lost Tree Islands to a public
referendum.
Commissioner Eggert noted that the County attorneys were aware of her actions at
the last hearing and assumed they would have advised her had she performed any illegal
action. She did not believe in government by referendum but thought the Board was elected
to represent all the people of the community. She has heard from people all over the County
regarding this situation and has been told, both by local attorneys and attorneys in
Tallahassee that the bridgehead ordinance will not hold. She did not feel there was any point
in delaying action any further.
Commissioner Ginn agreed with Commissioner Eggert and felt the voters voted for
the $26,000,000 bond issue to acquire environmentally sensitive lands. She believed this
purchase will be a benchmark and will go down in history.
Commissioner Ginn then questioned staff regarding Florida Community Trust's
requirements should the County accept their dollars toward this purchase.
County Administrator Chandler advised those requirements would be a part of the
presentation next Tuesday after he has met with staff and an agreement has been reached.
The agreement will be presented to the Board next week, together with the costs involved.
MAY 1% 1998
-77-
Vice Chairman Macht noted, in response to Commissioner Ginn's comments
regarding the removal of exotics, that the City of Vero Beach has an ordinance which
requires removal of exotics if they are not maintained as landscape items. He then reminded
the Board that Commissioner Eggert had called for a referendum of the tax rebate question
twice. He did not believe the people have spoken as 47% of them did not wish to do this in
the first place. He felt the County needs to deal with the slim majority who passed the bond
issue as to whether or not they want to spend more than the appraised value. He believed
that elected representatives are in a situation of responsibility for interpreting citizens' wishes
but felt that in the larger issues, citizens have a right to be heard. He also felt the
environmental community has a stake in this.
Vice Chairman Macht continued that the Land Acquisition Advisory Committee was
doing a step-by-step, very responsible job in acquiring environmental lands. Attributes were
considered and evaluated after presentations and these islands consistently fell very low in
the rating system. All properties acquired by the County were acquired at a price established
by appraisals and almost all were obtained below the appraised value. If we pay Lost Tree
Village $11,900,000, we will have gutted the LAAC funds and lost any opportunity for many
other properties more suited for acquisition by the County. We have not even addressed the
western part of the County. What you have here is a welter of information based on special
interests with very narrow knowledge of the subject matter.
Discussion then ensued regarding the confidentiality of the appraisal information, and
County Administrator Chandler asked that the information not be released until confirmed
with FCT.
THE CHAIRMAN CALLED THE QUESTION and
the Motion failed by a 2-3 vote (Commissioners
Eggert and Ginn and Chairman Tippin opposed).
MAY 199 1998
10
C
There being no further business, on Motion duly made, seconded and carried, the
Board adjourned at 9:45 a.m.
ATTEST:
J. n, Clerk
Minutes Approved: - l / 9 9
MAY 199 1998
Jo . Tippin, ChairffiaA
-79-
r�V[ 17j