HomeMy WebLinkAbout6/9/1998MINUTES'ATTACHED �
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
A G E N D A
TUESDAY, JUNE 99 1998
9:00 A.M. - COUNTY COMMISSION CHAMBER
County Administration Building
1840 25th Street, Vero Beach, Florida 32960
COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
John W. Tipp4 Chairman (District 4)
Kenneth R Macht, Vice Chairman (District 3)
Fran B. Adams (District 1)
Carolyn K. Eggert (District 2)
Caroline D. Ginn (District 5)
James E. Chandler, County Administrator
Charles P. Vitunac, County Attorney
Jeffrey K. Barton, Clerk to the Board
9:00 a.m. 1. CALL TO ORDER BACKUP
PAGES
2. INVOCATION None
3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE - Comm. Fran B. Adams
4. ADDITIONS to the AGENDA/EMERGENCY ITEMS
D.C. Carson Platt Estate Acquisition and State's Policy of Not Allowing Counties to Hold a Title
Interest when Participating in Joint Environmental Land Acquisitions
14.A.3. Feasibility Studies for Fire Stations #3, 5, 8, 9, and Planned North Barrier Island Station
5. PROCLAMATION and PRESENTATIONS
Presentation of Proclamation Designating the Week of
June 15-19, 1998 as Code Enforcement Officers'
Appreciation Week in Indian River County
6. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
None
7. CONSENT AGENDA
A. Received & Placed on File in Office of Clerk to
the Board: 1) Indian River Farms Water Control
District Map; 2) Fellsmere Water Control Dis-
trict Map
B. Approval of Warrants
(memorandum dated May 28,1998)
C. Resignation from and Replacement to the Public
Library Advisory Board
(memorandum dated May 22, 1998)
1
2-11
12
BOOK DO PAGE 01
BOOR 106 PAGE 02
7. CONSENT AGENDA (cont'd.):
D. Request that the Board Approve an Extension to
the Florida Communities Trust (FCT) Cost -Share
Acquisition Agreement for Purchase of the Lost
Tree Islands
(memorandum dated June 2, 1998)
E. Board Consideration of Consultant Rankings for
Development of a Sebastian Area -Wide Scrub Jay
Habitat Conservation Plan (HCP)
(memorandum dated June 2, 1998)
F. Windsor Properties Inc.'s Request for Planned
Development (PD) Final Plat Approval for Block
30 (Windsor Plat 17)
(memorandum dated June 3, 1998)
G. County Owned Property (Former Youth Manor
Site) - Lease Agreement
(memorandum dated May 28, 1998)
H. Miscellaneous Budget Amendment #020
(memorandum dated June 2,1998)
I. Payments to Vendors of Court Related Costs
(memorandum dated June 1, 1998)
J. 4 Recently Acquired Properties - Tax Cancellations
(memorandum dated June 1, 1998)
K. Budget Adjustment
(letter dated June 2, 1998)
L. LLEBG 1997 Follow -Up Progress Report
(memorandum dated June 3, 1998)
8. CONSTITUTIONAL OFFICERS and
GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES
Sheriff Gary C. Wheeler.
COPS MORE Grant
(letter dated June 3, 1998)
9:05 A.M. 9. PUBLIC ITEMS
A. PUBLIC HEARINGS
BACKUP
PAGES
13-16
17-31
32-42
43-45
46-50
51
52-62
63
66-105
1. AN ORDINANCE OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY,
FLORIDA, AMENDING THE ZONING ORDI-
NANCE AND THE ACCOMPANYING ZONING
MAP FROM CG TO PD COMMERCIAL FOR
APPROXIMATELY 4.76 ACRES OF LAND
GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE
OF SR 60 IN THE 8400 BLOCK; AND DESCRIBED
HEREIN, AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE
DATE (Quasi -Judicial)
(memorandum dated June 1, 1998) 106-125
9:05 A.M. 9. PUBLIC ITEMS (cont'd.): BACKUP
A. PUBLIC HEARINGS-(contd.):
PAGES
2. CED Construction Inc.'s Request for Planned
Development (PD) Special Exception Use and
Concurrent Preliminary PD Plan Approval to
Construct an Elderly Affordable Multi -Family r
Development to be Known as The Club at Vero
(Quasi -Judicial)
(memorandum dated May 29, 1998) 126-143
3. AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS INDIAN RIVER COUNTY,
FLORIDA, AMENDING SECTION 401.14 TO
CLARIFY THE AGRICULTURAL EXEMPTION
TO THE BUILDING CODE
(memorandum dated June 3, 1998) 144-148
4. AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY,
FLORIDA, AMENDING SECTION 307.02, INDIAN
RIVER COUNTY CODE TO PROHIBIT PARKING
IN HANDICAP AISLES
(memorandum dated June 3, 1998) 149-153
B. PUBLIC DISCUSSION ITEMS
Request from Marbrisa Seaside Homeowners Association
for County to Plant Landscaping at Seagrape Beach
Access North of Marbrisa
(memorandum dated June 2,1998) 154-158
C. PUBLIC NOTICE ITEMS
None
10. COUNTY ARNMUSTRATOR'S MATTERS
None
11. DEPARTMENTAL MATTERS
A. Community Development
None
B. Emergency Services
None
C. General Services
None
D. Leisure Services
Golf Carts - Sole Brand Designation - Purchase
(memorandum dated May 28, 1998) 159-160
E. Office of Management and Budget
FY 1998-99 Anti -Drug Abuse Grant Funding
(memorandum dated May 29, 1998) 161-162
F. Personnel
Group Life Insurance Renewal
(memorandum dated June 2, 1998) 163-166
BOOK 10 6 P'AGE 03
i
-I
11. DEPARTMENTAL MATTERS (cont'd )•
G. Public Works
16th Street Right -of -Way Acquisition
43rd Ave. Improvements -Parcel No. 121,
William E. Orth, Jr. and James N. Orth
(memorandum dated June 1, 1998)
H. Utilities
Gardenia Gardens Developer's Agreement
Finalization
(memorandum dated June 1, 1998)
12. COUNTY ATTORNEY
None
13. COMMISSIONERS ITEMS
A. Chairman John W. Tiepin
B. Vice Chairman Kenneth R. Macht
C. Commissioner Fran B. Adams
D. Commissioner Carolyn K. Ert
E. Commissioner Caroline D. Ginn
Discussion of Children's Services Network
8001( 106 PACE 04
BACKUP
PAGES
167-171
172-193
14. SPECIAL DISTRICTSBOARDS
A. Emergency Services District
1. Approval of minutes - meeting of 5/5/98
2. Health Occupations Agreement Between
District Board of Trustees of Indian River
Community College and the Indian River
County Emergency Services District
(memorandum dated May 22, 1998) 194-196
� i
BACKUP
14. SPECIAL DISTRICTSBOARDS (cont'd )• PAGES
B. Solid Waste Disposal District
1. Approval of Minutes - meeting of 5/5/98
2. Interagency/Public Works Agreement
(memorandum dated May 21, 1998) 197-202
C. Environmental Control Board
None
15. ADJOURNMENT
Anyone who may wish to appeal any decision which may be made at this meeting will need
to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made which includes the testimony and
evidence upon which the appeal will be based.
Anyone who needs a special accommodation for this meeting may contact the county's
Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) coordinator at 567-8000 x408 at least 48 hours in advance
of meeting. -- �- -- ----
Meeting may be broadcast live on TCI Cable Channel 13 - rebroadcast various times
throughout the week
Falcon Cable Channel 35 - rebroadcast Friday evening
BOW 106 PAGE 05
INDEX TO MINUTES
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
MEETING OF JUNE 99 1998
1. CALL TO ORDER ............................................... 1
2. INVOCATION...................................................1
3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ....................................... 1
4. ADDITIONS TO THE AGENDA .................................... 1
5. PROCLAMATION .............................................. 2
S.A. Code Enforcement Officers' Appreciation Week - June 15-19, 1998 .... 2
6. APPROVAL OF MINUTES ........................................ 3
7. CONSENT AGENDA ............................................
3
7.A.
Reports ..................................................
3
7.B.
Approval of Warrants .......................................
3
7.C.
Library Advisory Board - Resignation of Elizabeth O'Connor -
Appointment of Margaret Kamakaris ...........................
11
7.D.
Florida Communities Trust (FCT) Cost -Share Acquisition Agreement
Extension for Purchase of Lost Tree Islands (Addendum VIII) .......
12
7.E.
Sebastian Area -Wide Scrub Jay Habitat Conservation Plan Development -
Consultant Rankings - Smith Environmental Services Ranked First ....
14
7.F.
Windsor Properties Inc. - Planned Development (PD) Final Plat Approval
for Block 30 (Windsor Plat 17) ...............................
16
7.G.
Children's Home Society Lease Agreement (Former Youth Manor Site)
7.H.
..................................................... ..
Miscellaneous Budget Amendment 020 .........................
18
19
7.I.
Payments to Vendors of Court -Related Costs ....................
21
71
Recently Acquired Properties (4) - Tax Cancellations - 1) R/W 43rd
Avenue (Carwash West, Inc.); 2) R/W Willow Street (DaSilva); 3) R/W CR
510 - (Graves Brothers Co.); 4) R/W 66th Avenue - (Peterson) .......
22
7.K.
Sheriff's Office - Budget Amendment ..........................
33
7.L.
Local Law Enforcement Block Grant (LLEBG) - 1997 - Progress Report
........................................................
34
8. SHERIFF WHEELER - 1998 COPS MORE GRANT ................... 35
9.A.1. PUBLIC HEARING - MAGI INTERNATIONAL MANAGEMENT CO. -
REQUEST TO REZONE APPROXIMATELY 4.76 ACRES (OWNED BY
HARRY W. CLAYTON FAMILY TRUST) FROM CG TO PD (COMMERCIAL)
AND REQUEST PRELIMINARY PD PLAN/PLAT APPROVAL FOR A MINI
STORAGE FACILITY (SR -60) .................................... 38
1
BOOK 106FAGS 07
Ir 1
BOOK 106 PAGE 08
9.A.2. PUBLIC HEARING - CED CONSTRUCTION - PD SPECIAL EXCEPTION USE
& CONCURRENT PRELIMINARY PD PLAN APPROVAL - CONSTRUCTION
OF ELDERLY AFFORDABLE MULTI -FAMILY DEVELOPMENT - THE
CLUB AT VERO (CURRENTLY OWNED BY WILLIAM AND PENNY
BARKER..................................................... 52
9.A.3. PUBLIC HEARING - ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 401.14 TO
CLARIFY THE AGRICULTURAL EXEMPTION TO THE BUILDING CODE
............................................................. 65
9.A.4. PUBLIC HEARING - ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 307.02 -
PROHIBITION PARKING IN HANDICAP AISLES .................... 67
9.B. PUBLIC DISCUSSION ITEM - MARBRISA SEASIDE HOMEOWNERS
ASSOCIATION'S REQUEST FOR COUNTY TO PLANT LANDSCAPING AT
SEAGRAPE BEACH ............................................ 70
I I.D. GOLF CARTS - SOLE BRAND DESIGNATION - GO FOR RFP DECISION -
GREENS' OVERSEEDING INFORMATION ....................... 74
1 LE. ANTI-DRUG ABUSE GRANT FUNDING FY 1998-99 ................. 79
11.F. GROUP LIFE INSURANCE RENEWAL - COUNTY EMPLOYEES ....... 81
l l.G. 16TH AVENUE RIGHT-OF-WAY ACQUISITION - 43RD AVENUE
IMPROVEMENTS - PARCEL 121 - ORTH 82
1 LH. GARDENIA GARDENS - DEVELOPER'S AGREEMENT FINALIZATION
............................................................. 83
13.C. COMMISSIONER ADAMS - CARSON PLATT ESTATE AND REVIEW OF
STATE'S POLICY OF NOT ALLOWING COUNTIES TO HOLD A TITLE
INTEREST WHEN PARTICIPATING IN JOINT ENVIRONMENTAL LAND
ACQUISITIONS - COMMISSIONER ADAMS TO ATTEND JULY LAMAC
MEETING IN TALLAHASSEE ................................... 85
13.E. COMMISSIONER GINN - CHILDREN'S SERVICES NETWORK ........ 89
14.A. EMERGENCY SERVICES DISTRICT .............................. 92
14.B. SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL DISTRICT ............................. 92
2
0 - 0
June 9, 1998
The Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida, met in Regular
Session at the County Commission Chambers, 1840 25' Street, Vero Beach, Florida, on
Tuesday, June 9, 1998. Present were John W. Tippin, Chairman; Kenneth R Macht, Vice
Chairman; Fran B. Adams; Carolyn K. Eggert and Caroline D. Ginn. Also present were
James E. Chandler, County Administrator; Charles P. Vitunac, County Attorney; and Patricia
Ridgely, Deputy Clerk.
L CALL TO ORDER
The Chairman called the meeting to order at 9:00 a.m.
2. EWOCATION
Commissioner Ginn delivered the invocation.
3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Commissioner Adams led the Pledge to the Flag.
4. ADDITIONS TO THE AGENDA
Commissioner Eggert requested the addition of 14.A.3., Feasibility Studies for Fire
Stations #3, 55, 82 9, and Planned North Barrier Island Station, to the Emergency Services
District meeting agenda.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED BY
Commissioner Adams, the Board unanimously added the item
to the agenda.
June 9, 1998
1
BOOK 106 PAGE 09.
BOOK 106 PAGE 10
Following the Solid Waste Disposal District meeting, Commissioner Adams reported
on a letter which had been just received from Bill Roberts (lobbyist) of Tallahassee
concerning the Carson Platt Estate purchase and a meeting of the Land Acquisition and
Management Advisory Council at which they will review the State's policy of not allowing
counties to hold a title interest when participating in joint land acquisitions. This matter has
been added to the agenda as item 13.C. for record-keeping purposes.
5. PROCLAMATION
S.A. Code Enforcement Officers' Appreciation Week - June 15-19=
1998
Chairman Tippin read the following proclamation aloud. It was accepted on behalf
of the Code Enforcement Officers (who were working outside of the building) by
Community Development Director Bob Keating.
June 9, 1998
PROCLAMATION
DEBIQG JOKE iS - JANE 19, 1998
AS CODE EMF EcMG NT OFFICERS'
AVFRSCIATION WEER ffi
INDIAN RIVER CODNT!
WHEREAS, Code Enforcement Officers provide for the safety,
health and welfare of the citizens in the community through the
enforcement of building, zoning, housing, animal control, fire
safety, environmental, and other codes and ordinances; and
WHEREAS, Code Enforcement Officers are often not credited
for the jobs that they do in saving lives and improving
neighborhoods, as are emergency personnel such as police, fire,
and emergency medical services; and
WHEREAS, every day, assisted by support and program staff,
they attempt to provide quality customer service to the public
for the betterment of the community; and
WHEREAS, too many times, their efforts go unnoticed, even
after code compliance has been accomplished due to their efforts
and expertise; and
WHEREAS, Code Enforcement Officers are dedicated, well
trained, and highly responsible individuals who take their jobs
seriously and are proud of their department and the local
government within which they serve:
NOW, Tom, HE IT 8R =RXMW By TBE BOARD OF Comm
CO!ffiSSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COMM, FLORIDA that the week of
June 15 - 19, 1998 be designated as
CODE EXPORCEMOM OFBICERB' APPRECIATION WEER
in Indian River County. The Board thanks the Code Enforcement
Officers for their dedication and outstanding service to this
community. The Board further encourages all citizens of this
county to express their appreciation to these individuals who
serve as Code Enforcement Officers in our county.
Adopted this 9 day of June, 1998.
2
BOARD OF CODNTr CMMSSIONERS
INDIAN RIVER COMM. FLORIDA.
6. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
None.
7. CONSENT AGENDA
Commissioner Ginn requested that item 7.D. be separated from the Consent Agenda
for discussion.
7.A. Reports
The following reports have been received and placed on file in the office of the Clerk
to the Board:
1) Indian River Farms Water Control District Map
2) Fellsmere Water Control District Map
7.B. Approval
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of May 28, 1998:
TO: HONORABLE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
DATE: MAY 28, 1998
SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF WARRANTS
FROM: EDWIN M. FRY, JR., FINANCE DIRECTOR
In compliance with Chapter 136.06, Florida Statutes, all warrants issued
by the Board of County Commissioners are to be recorded in the Board minutes.
Approval is requested for the attached list of warrants, issued by the Clerk
to the Board, for the time period of May 21 to May 28, 1998.
June 9, 1998
3
BOOK 106 NAGE 11
BOOK 106 PAGE 12
ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED BY
Commissioner Ginn, the Board unanimously approved the list
of warrants issued by the Clerk to the Board for the period May
21-28, 1998, as requested.
CHECK
NAME
CHECK
CHECK
NUMBER
DATE
AMOUNT
0019340
INDIAN RIVER FEDERAL CREDIT
1998-04-15
.00
0019406
GREGORY, BRENDA
1998-05-21
1,496.91
0019407
KRUCZKIEWICZ, LORIANE
1998-05-28
138.50
0019408
BREVARD COUNTY CLERK OF THE
1998-05-28
422.04
0019409
ORANGE COUNTY CLERK OF THE
1998-05-28
135.20
0019410
ST LUCIE COUNTY CLERK OF THE
1998-05-28
350.50
0019411
RICHLAND COUNTY CLERK OF THE
1998-05-28
150.00
0019412
VELASQUEZ, MERIDA
1998-05-28
200.00
0019413
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY CLERK OF
1998-05-28
5,620.42
0019414
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY BOARD OF
1998-05-28
193.95
0019415
OKEECHOBEE CO., PMTS DOMES REL
1998-05-28
167.25
0019416
JACKSON COUNTY CLERK OF THE
1998-05-28
124.80
0019417
DOUGLAS COUNTY'CLERK OF COURT
1998 -OS -28
23.08
0019418
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
1998-05-28
200.00
0019419
VERO BEACH FIREFIGHTERS ASSOC.
1998-05-28
1,956.00
0019420
INDIAN RIVER FEDERAL CREDIT
1998-05-28
87,472.43
0019421
COLONIAL LIFE & ACCIDENT
1998-05-28
257.69
0019422
NACO/SOUTHEAST
1998-05-28
4,990.21
0019423
KEY TRUST COMPANY
1998-05-28
760.25
0239556
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF
1998-03-26
.00
0241209
LESTICIER, ADMARIE
1998-04-23
.00
0241904
INTERNATIONAL PALM SOCIETY,INC
1998-05-07
.00
0242186
ECKERD DRUG CO
1998-05-14
.00
0242244
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
1998-05-14
.00
0242528
AFFORDABLE LAND SERVICES, INC.
1998-05-21
.00
0242585
DAVES SPORTING GOODS
1998-05-21
.00
0243138
A-1 TREE EXPERTS, INC
1998-05-28
325.00
0243139
ADVANCED GARAGE DOORS, INC
1998-05-28
85.00
0243140
AERO PRODUCTS CORPORATION-
1998-05-28
528.00
0243141
ALPHA ACE HARDWARE
1998-05-28
43.15
0243142
ANIMAL CARE EQUIPMENT AND
1998-05-28
102.57
0243143
APPLE INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY CO
1998-05-28
480.82
0243144
APPLE MACHINE & SUPPLY CO
1998-05-28
252.58
0243145
ATCO TOOL SUPPLY
1998-05-28
211.36
0243146
AUDIOHOUSE
1998-05-28
48.50
0243147
AUTO SUPPLY CO OF VERO BEACH,
1998-05-28
662.12
0243148
AT EASE ARMY NAVY
1998-05-28
402.00
0243149
AEROSPACE EXPRESS
1998-05-28
93.00
0243150
ALL FLORIDA COFFEE & BOTTLED
1998-05-28
37.90
0243151
ADDISON OIL CO
1998-05-28
62.46
0243152
APCO INTERNATIONAL
1998-05-28
1,320.00
0243153
A T & T WIRELESS SERVICES
1998-05-28
135.30
0243154
A T & T
1998-05-28
30.84
0243155
AMERICAN LIBRARY ASSOC
1998-05-28
40.50
0243156
ATLANTIC COASTAL TITLE CORP
1998-05-28
65.00
0243157
ALBERTSON'S
1998-05-28
33.09
0243158
ALL COUNTY EQUIPMENT COMPANY
1998-05-28
584.00
June 9, 1998
4
0
CHECK
NAME
CHECK
CHECK
NUMBER
DATE
AMOUNT
0243159
AUTO PARTS OF VERO, INC
1998-05-28
1,322.36
0243160
ARCHITECTS & DESIGNERS
1998-05-28
487.39
0243161
ABS
1998-05-28
987.83
0243162
BAKER DISTRIBUTING CO
1998-05-28
36.12
0243163
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
1998-05-28
4,222.91
0243164
BLACKHAWK QUARRY COMPANY
1998-05-28
968.85
0243165
BELLSOUTH MOBILITY
1998-05-28
28.44
0243166
BARTON, JEFFREY K- CLERK
1998-05-28
184,755.35
0243167
BARTON, JEFFREY K -CLERK
1998-05-28
4,108.50
0243168
BERGGREN EQUIPMENT CO, INC
1998-05-28
215.07
0243169
B & B INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY CO.
1998-05-28
873.68
0243170
BARTON, JEFFREY K
1998-05-28
8,987.75
0243171
BRODART CO
1998-05-28
240.29
0243172
JANICE C BRODA, INC
1998-05-28
150.00
0243173
BOOKS IN MOTION
1998-05-28
15.00
0243174
BENSON, DANIEL W MD
1998 -OS -28
100.00
0243175
BOYNTON PUMP & IRRIGATION
1998-05-28
484.47
0243176
BILLING SERVICES INC
1998-05-28
47.28
0243177
BISHOP, SUSAN D
1998-05-28
256.00
0243178
BOTTORF ASSOCIATES, INC
1998-05-28
380.00
0243179
BAKER & TAYLOR ENTERTAINMENT
1998-05-28
1,056.47
0243180
BELLSOUTH
1998-05-28
12,000.62
0243181
BOGOSIAN & POWER
1998-05-28
475.00
0243182
BELLSOUTH PUBLIC COMMUNICATION
1998-05-28
29.88
0243183
BAKER & TAYLOR INC
1998-05-28
329.45
0243184
BMG
1998-05-28
87.12
0243185
BELFORD, DENNIS
1998-05-28
34.23
0243186
BLONDER, MICHELE
1998-05-28
20.00
0243187
BALLESTER, ANTONIO
1998-05-28
72.10
0243188
BELLSOUTH
1998-05-28
269.33
0243189
BROWN & CALDWELL
1998-05-28
91598.99
0243190
CITRUS MOTEL
1998-05-28
138.00
0243191
CLEMENTS PEST CONTROL
1998-05-28
19.00
0243192
COMMUNICATIONS INT'L INC
1998-05-28
5,000.00
0243193
CONSTRUCTIVE PLAYTHINGS
1998-05-28
30.33
0243194
CHEMSEARCH
1998-05-28
140.79
0243195
COASTAL REFINING & MARKETING
1998-05-28
5,817.98
0243196
CLINIC PHARMACY
1998-05-28
214.90
0243197
CENTER FOR THE ARTS, INC
1998-05-28
4,100.00
0243198
CLIFF BERRY ENVIRONMENTAL
1998-05-28
55.00
0243199
CALL ONE, INC
1998-05-28
11.57
0243200
CROSSROADS ANIMAL HOSPITAL
1998-05-28
21.00
0243201
CRITIC'S CHOICE VIDEO
1998-05-28
50.45
0243202
CONTRACT CONNECTION, INC
1998-05-28
7,503.00
0243203
CENTER FOR EMOTIONAL AND
1998-05-28
313.50
0243204
COURT REPORTERS INC
1998-05-28
293.00
0243205
COLUMBIA HOUSE
1998-05-28
12.76
0243206
CARTER, KELLY
1998-05-28
206.00
0243207
CORVEL
1998-05-28
330.32
0243208
CASTORENA, ISRAEL O
1998-05-28
25.00
0243209
CLUNK, JEFFREY
1998-05-28
314.00
0243210
CENTRAL AIR CONDITIONING &
1998-05-28
18.07
0243211
DEEP SIX DIVE SHOP, INC
1998-05-28
858.60
0243212
DELTA SUPPLY CO
1998-05-28
450.97
0243213
DICKERSON-FLORIDA, INC
1998-05-28
1,473.64
June 9, 1998
5
BOOK i0b PAGE 13
BOOK 106 FACE 1
CHECK
NAME
CHECK
CHECK
NUMBER
DATE
AMOUNT
0243214
DIVE RESCUE INT'L, INC
1998-05-28
450.00
0243215
DAVIDSON TITLES, INC
1998-05-28
105.68
0243216
DADE PAPER COMPANY
1998-05-28
393.58
0243217
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF
1998-05-28
2,500.00
0243218
DAYTONA BEACH HILTON HOTEL
1998-05-28
220.50
0243219
DOWNTOWN PRODUCE INC
1998-05-28
136.11
0243220
DILLARD, LASSIE
1998-05-28
36.05
0243221
DOCTORS' CLINIC
1998-05-28
553.66
0243222
DETKO, CATHY
1998-05-28
25.00
0243223
E -Z BREW COFFEE SERVICE, INC
1998-05-28
443.20
0243224
ERRETT, NANCY
1998-05-28
367.07
0243225
ECOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC
1998-05-28
21,288.06
0243226
ELLIS, SCOTT
1998-05-28
36.00
0243227
ECKERD DRUG CO
1998-05-28
633.70
0243228
EDWARDS, BONNIE
1998-05-28
141.63
0243229
EHRLICH, CHAD
1998-05-28
37.03
0243230
FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP
1998-05-28
31.25
0243231
FLORIDA EAST COAST RAILWAY CO
1998-05-28
142.21
0243232
FLORIDA BAR, THE
1998-05-28
190.00
0243233
FLORIDA EQUIPMENT & SERV INC
1998-05-28
815.00
0243234
FPL
1998-05-28
7,273.48
0243235
FLOWERS BAKING COMPANY OF
1998-05-28
61.32
0243236
FLORIDA TIRE RECYCLING, INC
1998-05-28
749..40
0243237
FRANKLIN PRODUCTS CORP
1998-05-28
2,179.43
0243238
FALCON CABLE TV
1998-05-28
23.90
0243239
FLORIDA ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
1998-05-28
225.00
0243240
FELLSMERE, CITY OF
1998-05-28
98.84
0243241
FLORIDA INSTITUTE OF C P A'S
1998-05-28
159.00
0243242
FALZONE, MATTHEW
1998-05-28
38.63
0243243
FLORIDAFFINITY, INC
1998-05-28
4,880.00
0243244
FARM PLAN CORP
1998-05-28
326.89
0243245
FALZONE, CHRISTOPHER
1998-05-28
36.05
0243246
FLORIDA ANIMAL LEAGUE
1998-05-28
18.00
0243247
FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY
1998-05-28
27.00
0243248
GENERAL INSURANCE UNDERWRITERS
1998-05-28
87.00
0243249
GLIDDEN COMPANY, THE
1998-05-28
49.70
0243250
GOODKNIGHT LAWN EQUIPMENT, INC
1998-05-28
182.88
0243251
GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO INC
1998-05-28
270.95
0243252
GROLIER PUBLISHING COMPANY
1998-05-28
143.10
0243253
GOODYEAR AUTO SERVICE CENTER
1998-05-28
1,295.65
0243254
GREENE, ROBERT E
1998-05-28
1,736.98
0243255
GOODYEAR COMMERCIAL TIRE &
1998-05-28
4,087.72
0243256
GEAC COMPUTERS INC
1998-05-28
5,298.78
0243257
GARBER BUICK PONTIAC GMC TRUCK
1998-05-28
22,615.00
0243258
GIFFORD GROVES, LTD
1998-05-28
390.00
0243259
GLASER, AMY SMYTH
1998-05-28
200.58
0243260
GRILL REFILL, INC
1998-05-28
80.00
0243261
GLASS, LAURIE
1998-05-28
106.87
0243262
GOLDEN GATE TRAILER SALES,LLC
1998-05-28
32,831.08
0243263
GLASER, EDWARD
1998-05-28
72.10
4243264
HALL, PAMELA J
1998-05-28
67.58
0243265
HECTOR TURF, INC
1998-05-28
12,847.15
0243266
HERE'S FRED GOLF CO, INC
1998-05-28
31.92
0243267
HOLIDAY BUILDERS, INC
1998-05-28
1,500.00
0243268
HERITAGE BOOKS, INC
1998-05-28
234.00
0243269
HEBB, JOHN W JR
1998-05-28
68.73
0243270
HARRISON COMPANY PUBLISHERS
1998-05-28
78.80
0243271
HARRINGTON, SCOTT
1998-05-28
362.52
0243272
HIGHLANDS ANIMAL HOSPITAL
1998-05-28
15.00
0243273
HOMETOWN PET CARE CENTER
1998-05-28
119.75
0243274
HASENAUER, KRIS
1998-05-28
36.00
June 9, 1998
C.
•
CHECK
NAME
CHECK
CHECK
NUMBER
DATE
AMOUNT
0243275
HYATT REGENCY ORLANDO INT'L
1998-05-28
204.00
0243276
HAWKS CAY RESORT
1998-05-28
107.00
0243277
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
1998-05-28
54,638.75
0243278
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY SOLID
1998-05-28
756.00
0243279
INDIAN RIVER ACE HARDWARE
1998-05-28
2.19
0243280
INDIAN RIVER BATTERY, INC
1998-05-28
967.70
0243281
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY HEALTH
1998-05-28
30.00
0243282
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY UTILITY
1998-05-28
322.81
0243283
INDIAN RIVER OXYGEN, INC
1998-05-28
224.50
0243284
INGRAM
1998-05-28
73.83
0243285
INDIAN RIVER MEMORIAL HOSPITAL
1998-05-28
353.81
0243286
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
1998-05-28
18.66
0243287
INSURANCE SERVICING &
1998-05-28
3,635.00
0243288
IBM CORPORATION
1998-05-28
46.00
0243289
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
1998-05-28
1,322.18
0243290
IRON OFFICE SOLUTIONS
1998-05-28
816.63
0243291
IMLA
1998-05-28
224.00
0243292
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY SHERIFF'S
1998-05-28
175.00
0243293
CARLSON, JOYCE M JOHNSTON
1998-05-28
42.34
0243294
JONES CHEMICALS, INC
1998-05-28
6,965.41
0243295
KNIGHT & MATHIS, INC
1998-05-28
789.34
0243296
KESSLER, MICHAEL, ESQ
1998-05-28
210.00
0243297
LEAHY MICROGRAPHICS, INC
1998-05-28
1,380.38
0243298
LEISURE ARTS, INC
1998-05-28
29.45
0243299
LOWE'S HOME CENTERS, INC
1998-05-28
917.30
0243300
LOCKWOOD, THOMAS
1998-05-28
1,331.34
0243301
LIGHT SOURCE BUSINESS SYSTEMS
1998-05-28
308.76
0243302
LFI VERO BEACH, INC
1998-05-28
7,131.44
0243303
LOGAN'S SHARPENING & SMALL
1998-05-28
45.00
0243304
LUCENT TECHNOLOGIES
1998-05-28
86.95
0243305
LOWE'S HOME CENTERS, INC
1998-05-28
227.83
0243306
LABCORP
1998-05-28
375.00
0243307
LOWTHER CREMATION SERVICES INC
1998-05-28
300.00
0243308
LOCKHART, WILLIE A
1998-05-28
300.00
0243309
LOCKHART, RUBY
1998-05-28
300.00
0243310
M D MOODY & SONS, INC
1998-05-28
223.40
0243311
MCCOLLUM, NATHAN
1998-05-28
107.00
0243312
MCCORKLE RADIOLOGY
1998-05-28
18.00
0243313
INDIAN RIVER COMMUNITY COLLEGE
1998-05-28
14,174.17
0243314
MICKLER'S FLORIDIANA, INC
1998-05-28
98.18
0243315
MIKES GARAGE
1998-05-28
621.00
0243214
DIVE RESCUE INT'L, INC
1998-05-28
450.00
0243215
DAVIDSON TITLES, INC
1998-05-28
105.68
0243216
DADE PAPER COMPANY
1998-05-28
393.58
0243217
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF
1998-05-28
2,500.00
0243218
DAYTONA BEACH HILTON HOTEL
1998-05-28
220.50
0243219
DOWNTOWN PRODUCE INC
1998-05-28
136.11
0243220
DILLARD, LASSIE
1998-05-28
36.05
0243221
DOCTORS' CLINIC
1998-05-28
553.66
0243222
DETKO, CATHY
1998-05-28
25.00
0243223
E -Z BREW COFFEE SERVICE, INC
1998-05-28
443.20
0243224
ERRETT, NANCY
1998-05-28
367.07
0243225
ECOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC
1998-05-28
21,288.06
0243226
ELLIS, SCOTT
1998-05-28
36.00
0243227
ECKERD DRUG CO
1998-05-28
633.70
0243228
EDWARDS, BONNIE
1998-05-28
141.63
0243229
EHRLICH, CHAD
1998-05-28
37.03
0243230
FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP
1998-05-28
31.25
0243231
FLORIDA EAST COAST RAILWAY CO
1998-05-28
142.21
0243232
FLORIDA BAR, THE
1998-05-28
190.00
0243233
FLORIDA EQUIPMENT & SERV INC
1998-05-28
815.00
June 9, 1998
7
BOOK 106 PAGE 15
BOOK 106 PAGE
CHECK
NAME
CHECK
CHECK
NUMBER
DATE
AMOUNT
0243234
FPL
1998-05-28
7,273.48
0243235
FLOWERS BAKING COMPANY OF
1998-05-28
61.32
0243236
FLORIDA TIRE RECYCLING, INC
1998-05-28
749.40
0243237
FRANKLIN PRODUCTS CORP
1998-05-28
2,179.43
0243238
FALCON CABLE TV
1998-05-28
23.90
0243239
FLORIDA ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
1998-05-28
225.00
0243240
FELLSMERE, CITY OF
1998-05-28
98.84
0243241
FLORIDA INSTITUTE OF C P A'S
1998-05-28
159.00
0243242
FALZONE, MATTHEW
1998-05-28
38.63
0243243
FLORIDAFFINITY, INC
1998-05-28
4,880.00
0243244
FARM PLAN CORP
1998-05-28
326.89
0243245
FALZONE, CHRISTOPHER
1998-05-28
36.05
0243246
FLORIDA ANIMAL LEAGUE
1998-05-28
18.00
0243247
FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY
1998-05-28
27.00
0243248
GENERAL INSURANCE UNDERWRITERS
1998-05-28
87.00
0243249
GLIDDEN COMPANY, THE
1998-05-28
49.70
0243250
GOODKNIGHT LAWN EQUIPMENT, INC
1998-05-28
182.88
0243251
GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO INC
1998-05-28
270.95
0243252
GROLIER PUBLISHING COMPANY
1998-05-28
143.10
0243253
GOODYEAR AUTO SERVICE CENTER
1998-05-28
1,295.65
0243254
GREENE, ROBERT E
1998-05-28
1,736.98
0243255
GOODYEAR COMMERCIAL TIRE &
1998-05-28
4,087.72
0243256
GEAC COMPUTERS INC
1998-05-28
5,298.78
0243257
GARBER BUICK PONTIAC GMC TRUCK
1998-05-28
22,615.00
0243258
GIFFORD GROVES, LTD
1998-05-28
390.00
0243259
GLASER, AMY SMYTH
1998-05-28
200.58
0243260
GRILL REFILL, INC
1998-05-28
80.00
0243261
GLASS, LAURIE
1998-05-28
106.87
0243262
GOLDEN GATE TRAILER SALES,LLC
1998-05-28
32,831.08
0243263
GLASER, EDWARD
1998-05-28
72.10
0243264
HALL, PAMELA J
1998-05-28
67.58
0243265
HECTOR TURF, INC
1998-05-28
12,847.15
0243266
HERE'S FRED GOLF CO, INC
1998-05-28
31.92
0243267
HOLIDAY BUILDERS, INC
1998-05-28
1,500.00
0243268
HERITAGE BOOKS, INC
1998-05-28
234.00
0243269
HEBB, JOHN W JR
1998-05-28
68.73
0243270
HARRISON COMPANY PUBLISHERS
1998-05-28
78.80
0243271
HARRINGTON, SCOTT
1998-05-28
362.52
0243272
HIGHLANDS ANIMAL HOSPITAL
1998-05-28
15.00
0243273
HOMETOWN PET CARE CENTER
1998-05-28
119.75
0243274
HASENAUER, KRIS
1998-05-28
36.00
0243275
HYATT REGENCY ORLANDO INT"L
1998-05-28
204.00
0243276
HAWKS CAY RESORT
1998-05-28
107.00
0243277
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
1998-05-28
54,638.75
0243278
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY SOLID
1998-05-28
756.00
0243279
INDIAN RIVER ACE HARDWARE
1998-05-28
2.19
0243280
INDIAN RIVER BATTERY, INC
1998-05-28
967.70
0243281
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY HEALTH
1998-05-28
30.00
0243282
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY UTILITY
1998-05-28
322.81
0243283
INDIAN RIVER OXYGEN, INC
1998-05-28
224.50
0243284
INGRAM
1998-05-28
73.83
0243285
INDIAN RIVER MEMORIAL HOSPITAL
1998-05-28
353.81
0243286
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
1998-05-28
18.66
0243287
INSURANCE SERVICING &
1998-05-28
3,635.00
0243288
IBM CORPORATION
1998-05-28
46.00
0243289
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
1998-05-28
1,322.18
0243290
IKON OFFICE SOLUTIONS
1998-05-28
816.63 .
0243291
IMLA
1998-05-28
224.00
0243292
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY SHERIFF'S
1998-05-28
175.00
0243293
CARLSON, JOYCE M JOHNSTON
1998-05-28
42.34
0243294
JONES CHEMICALS, INC
1998-05-28
6,965.41
June 9, 1998
8
vft
I
•
CHECK
NAME
CHECK
CHECK
NUMBER
DATE
AMOUNT
0243295
KNIGHT & MATHIS, INC
1998-05-28
789.34
0243296
KESSLER, MICHAEL, ESQ
1998-05-28
210.00
0243297
LEAHY MICROGRAPHICS, INC
1998-05-28
1,380.38
0243298
LEISURE ARTS, INC
1998-05-28
29.45
0243299
LOWE'S HOME CENTERS, INC
1998-05-28
917.30
0243300
LOCKWOOD, THOMAS
1998-05-28
1,331.34
0243301
LIGHT SOURCE BUSINESS SYSTEMS
1998-05-28
308.76
0243302
LFI VERO BEACH, INC
1998-05-28
7,131.44
0243303
LOGAN'S SHARPENING & SMALL
1998-05-28
45.00
0243304
LUCENT TECHNOLOGIES
1998-05-28
86.95
0243305
LOWE'S HOME CENTERS, INC
1998-05-28
227.83
0243306
LABCORP
1998-05-28
375.00
0243307
LOWTHER CREMATION SERVICES INC
1998-05-28
300.00
0243308
LOCKHART, WILLIE A
1998-05-28
300.00
0243309
LOCKHART, RUBY
1998-05-28
300.00
0243310
M D MOODY & SONS, INC
1998-05-28
223.40
0243311
MCCOLLUM, NATHAN
1998-05-28
107.00
0243312
MCCORKLE RADIOLOGY
1998-05-28
18.00
0243313
INDIAN RIVER COMMUNITY COLLEGE
1998-05-28
14,174.17
0243314
MICKLER'S FLORIDIANA, INC
1998-05-28
98.18
0243315
MIKES GARAGE
1998-05-28
621.00
0243316
MILNER DOCUMENT PRODUCTS
1998-05-28
200.00
0243317
MITRON SYSTEMS CORPORATION
1998-05-28
206.50
0243318
MEDICAL RECORD SERVICES, INC
1998-05-28
55.93
0243319
MILNER BUSINESS PRODUCTS
1998-05-28
1,565.00
0243320
MAURER, ERMA B, RN
1998-05-28
25.00
0243321
MIDWEST TAPE EXCHANGE
1998-05-28
27.90
0243322
MOON, D P
1998-05-28
922.82
0243323
MURDRICK, WITT, LEVY & CONSOR
1998-05-28
836.00
0243324
MEDIFIN, INC
1998-05-28
494.00
0243325
NATIONAL GEOGRAPHIC SOCIETY
1998-05-28
34.00
0243326
NOLTE, DAVID C
1998-05-28
170,283.73
0243327
NOTARY PUBLIC UNDERWRITER, INC
1998-05-28
93.00
0243328
NICOSIA, ROGER.J DO
1998-05-28
1,500.00
0243329
NATIONAL AMBULANCE BUILDERS,
1998-05-28
333.05
0243330
NEW HORIZONS OF THE TREASURE
1998-05-28
31,762.08
0243331
NATIONAL PROPANE CORP
1998-05-28
60.82
0243332
NICKERSON, LOUIS
1998-05-28
103.00
0243333
OFFICE PRODUCTS & SERVICE
1998-05-28
1,335.29
0243334
OFFICE PRODUCTS & SERVICE
1998-05-28
160.00
0243335
OFFICE DEPOT, INC
1998-05-28
1,327.45
0243336
OSCEOLA PHARMACY
1998-05-28
296.94
0243337
PROFESSIONAL GOLFERS' ASSOC
,1998-05-28
565.00
0243338
PIERCE MANUFACTURING CO
1998-05-28
222,225.00
0243339
PRIDE OF FLORIDA
1998-05-28
8,545.50
0243340
PROCTOR CONSTRUCTION
1998-05-28
500.00
0243341
PRESS JOURNAL
1998-05-28
507.75
0243342
POSTMASTER
1998-05-28
128.00
0243343
PETERSEN INDUSTRIES, INC
1998-05-28
442.46
0243344
PANGBURN, TERRI
1998-05-28
24.00
0243345
PRAXAIR DISTRIBUTION
1998-05-28
123.25
0243346
PROFESSIONAL CASE MANAGEMENT
1998-05-28
376.00
0243347
PROMEDIX
1998-05-28
495.49
0243348
PETERSON, FRED H AND
1998-05-28
18,509.10
0243349
PUBLIC -INTEREST VIDEO
1998-05-28
34.90
0243350
PIERCE MANUFACTURING, INC
1998-05-28
208,529.00
0243351
QUALITY BOOKS, INC
1998-05-28
95.22
0243352
R & J CRANE SERVICE, INC
1998-05-28
210.00
0243353
ROBINSON EQUIPMENT COMPANY,INC
1998-05-28
35.76
June 9, 1998
GJ
•
EOOK 106 PAGE 17
BOOK 146 ME 18
CHECK
NAME
CHECK
CHECK
NUMBER
DATE
AMOUNT
0243354
ROBERTS & REYNOLDS PA
1998-05-28
4,569.95
0243355
RANGER CONSTRUCTION IND, INC
1998-05-28
291.33
0243356
RUBBER STAMP EXPRESS & MORE
1998-05-28
13.50
0243357
RSR WHOLESALE SOUTH, INC
1998-05-28
6,108.48
0243358
SAFETY EQUIPMENT COMPANY
1998-05-28
273.55
0243359
SEBASTIAN, CITY OF
1998-05-28
150.00
0243360
SEXUAL ASSAULT ASSISTANCE
1998-05-28
4,420.75
0243361
SHERWIN-WILLIAMS
1998-05-28
86.03
0243362
SMART CORPORATION
1998-05-28
9.02
0243363
SOUTHERN CULVERT, DIV OF
1998-05-28
3,005.43
0243364
STATE OF FLORIDA
1998-05-28
29,970.48
0243365
STONE BROS FUNERAL HOME
1998-05-28
900.00
0243366
SUN COAST WELDING SUPPLIES INC
1998-05-28
59.80
0243367
ST LUCIE PAPER & PACKAGING,INC
1998-05-28
1,113.24
0243368
SERVICE REFRIGERATION CO, INC
1998-05-28
12.60
0243369
SIMON & SCHUSTER
1998-05-28
139.14
0243370
SOUTHERN SEWER EQUIPMENT SALES
1998-05-28
1,141.17
0243371
SHEPARD'S
1998-05-28
2,536.99
0243372
SUN BELT MEDICAL SUPPLY, INC
1998-05-28
949.20
0243373
SELIG CHEMICAL IND
1998-05-28
136.94
0243374
SALEM PRESS, INC
1998-05-28
94.25
0243375
SHELDON, JAMES
1998-05-28
159.13
0243376
SUPERIOR PRINTING
1998-05-28
102.00
0243377
STEWART MINING INDUSTRIES INC
1998-05-28
5,914.19
0243378
SEBASTIAN POLICE DEPARTMENT
1998-05-28
25.00
0243379
SCHWEY SERVICES
1998-05-28
1,595.00
0243380
SHELDON, JAMES
1998-05-28
184.44
0243381
SLP INVESTMENTS
1998-05-28
12.95
0243382
SERVICE MERCHANDISE
1998-05-28
109.97
0243383
TEXACO CREDIT CARD CENTER
1998-05-28
1,205.03
0243384
SAFETY ZONE SPECIALIST INC
1998-05-28
495.00
0243385
TW COMMUNICATIONS
1998-05-28
1,680.09
0243386
TREASURE COAST CONTRACTING,INC
1998-05-28
10,778.01
0243387
TEM SYSTEMS INC
1998-05-28
90.75
0243388
TRI -COUNTY GAS
1998-05-28
378.78
0243389
US FILTER DISTRIBUTION GROUP
1998-05-28
25,051.68
0243390
UNIVERSITY PARK MEDIA
1998-05-28
131.22
0243391
USA BLUEBOOK
1998-05-28
404.22
0243392
VERO BEACH HIGH SCHOOL
1998-05-28
200.00
0243393
VELDE FORD, INC
1998-05-28
2,123.88
0243394
VERO BEACH, CITY OF
1998-05-28
9,175.00
0243395
VERO CHEMICAL DISTRIBUTORS,INC
1998-05-28
3,338.26
0243396
VERO LAWNMOWER CENTER, INC
1998-05-28
217.73
0243397
VERO TRAVEL SERVICE, INC
1998-05-28
240.00
0243398
VERO BEACH, CITY OF
1998-05-28
1,621.54
0243399
VERO BEACH POLICE DEPARTMENT
1998-05-28
200.00
0243400
VEY, CARRIE
1998-05-28
128.75
0243401
VERO BEARING & BOLT
1998-05-28
618.47
0243402
VOLUNTEER ACTION CENTER
1998-05-28
125.00
0243403
VERO FIRST CORPORATION
1998-05-28
268.00
0243404
VERO BEACH FIREFIGHTERS
1998-05-28
2,500.00
0243405
VAL MATIC VALVE & MGF CORP
1998-05-28
48.71
0243406
WAL-MART STORES, INC
1998-05-28
292.10
0243407
WALGREENS PHARMACY
1998-05-28
217.53
0243408
WEST PUBLISHING PAYMENT CTR
1998-05-28
4,036.80
0243409
WINN DIXIE STORES, INC
1998-05-28
472.50
0243410
WILLHOFF, PATSY
1998-05-28
130.00
0243411
WHARTON-SMITH, INC
1998-05-28
342,941.95
0243412
WATERWORKS CAR WASH
1998-05-28
81.75
0243413
WEST, JEFF
1998-05-28
6.00
June 9, 1998
10
•
CHECK
NAME
CHECK
CHECK
NUMBER
DATE
AMOUNT
0243414
WOLFE, CARL
1998-05-28
6.00
0243415
WOLFE, MEGAN
1998-05-28
30.90
0243416
WALGREENS PHARMACY
1998-05-28
137.97
0243417
WOLFE, ERIN
1998-05-28
15.45
0243418
WASTE MANAGEMENT, INC
1998-05-28
372,023.46
0243419
YAVORSKY'S TRUCK SERVICE,INC
1998-05-28
1,010.74
0243420
GIARIZZI, SALVATORE
1998-05-28
53.56
0243421
LA ROSE, LOUIS & ANNETTE
1998-05-28
105.00
2,119,228.94
7.C. Library Advisory Board - Resignation of Elizabeth O'Connor -
Annointment o Margaret Kamakaris
The Board reviewed a Letter of May 22, 1998:
BETTY O'CONNOR
May 22, 1998 491 THOMAS STREET
SEBASTIAN. FL 32958
Commissioner Carolyn K. Eggert, Chairman
Public Library Advisory Board
1840 25th Street
Vero Beach, F132960
Dear Chairman Eggert,
I would like to submit my resignation as a member of the Public Library
Advisory Board.
I have enjoyed being involved in library policy for the past three years
and I thank you for appointing me.
May I suggest as a replacement Mrs. Margaret Kamakaris. She has been
actively involved with the Friends of the North Indian River County Library
for many years and is presently serving a second term as President.
It has been a pleasure serving on this Board.
Sincerely,
Elizabeth E. O'Connor
June 9, 1998
11
BOOK 10b PAGE 19
BOOK 106 PAGE 20
ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED BY
Commissioner Ginn, the Board unanimously accepted the
resignation of Elizabeth E. O'Connor from the Indian River
County Public Library Advisory Board and appointed Margaret
Kamakaris as her replacement.
7A Florida Communities Trust (FCTj Cost -Share Acquisition
Agreement Extension for Purchase ofLost Tree Islands (Addendum
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of June 2, 1998:
TO: James E. Chandler
County Administrator
DEP TMENT HEAD CONCURRENCE:
obert M. Keating, AI P j
Community Development Director
FROM: Roland M. DeBloib, AICP
Chief, Environmental Planning
DATE: June 2, 1998
RE: Request that the Board Approve an Extension to the Florida Communities Trust
(FCT) Cost -Share Acquisition Agreement for Purchase of the Lost Tree Islands
It is requested that the data herein presented be given formal consideration by the Board of County Commissioners at
its regular meeting of June 9, 1998.
DESCRIPTION ONDITIONS
Staff requests that the Board of County Commissioners authorize the Board Chairman to execute the attached
"Addendum VIII to the Conceptual Approval Agreement" for the Lost Tree Islands (FCT Project #93-001-P3A).
This Addendum extends the FCT grant award expiration date for the Lost Tree Islands project to December 4, 1998.
The document formalizes the FCT Governing Body's approval of county staffs request for an extension, which approval
occurred at the FCT Governing Body's meeting on May 18, 1998.
Acquisition Status
The Board of County Commissioners, at its meeting of May 26, 1998, voted to offer (through the Florida Communities
Trust) $7.1 million to Lost Tree Village Corporation for purchase of the islands. County staff has contacted FCT staff
concerning the offer (see attached). According to FCT staff, the formal revised offer is to occur the week of June 1 st.
FCT staff has indicated that the attached Addendum VIII grant extension is most likely the last extension that the FCT
Governing Board will approve for the project.
June 9, 1998
12
•
Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners authorize the Board Chairman to execute the attached
agreement addendum, and authorize staff to coordinate with the Town of Indian River Shores and the City of Vero
Beach for approval of the addendum by those municipalities.
Addendum VIII to the Conceptual Approval Agreement relating to County/State acquisition
of the Lost Tree Islands.
2. Letter dated 05/28/98 from county staff to FCT regarding the revised $7.1 million offer.
•
Commissioner Ginn advised that she had asked that this item be separated in order to
get a report from the County Attorney's Office on what has happened since the matter last
came before the Board..
Assistant County Attorney Terrence P. O'Brien responded that he had written a
memorandum to the Board last week advising that he had received a copy of a letter
addressed to Attorney Ernest Cox (attorney for Lost Tree Village) from FCT, dated June 4,
1998, transmitting a final offer in the amount of $7.1 million to Mr. Cox's client for the
acquisition of the property known as Lost Tree Islands with the necessary agreements for
signatures. The time for acceptance of the offer is June 22, 1998. Therefore, the offer is
now before Lost Tree to accept or reject or make a counteroffer. (Copy of letter on file with
the backup in the office of the Clerk to the Board.)
Commissioner Ginn noted that the interest of the public in this issue is still great as
could be seen by the number of interested citizens present in the Chambers. She cited her
reasons and recommended that if this attempt at further negotiations by FCT is not
productive that the County again bring negotiations back in-house.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Ginn, SECONDED BY
Commissioner Macht, the Board unanimously authorized the
Chairman to execute Addendum VIII to Conceptual Approval
Agreement and authorized staff to coordinate with the Town of
Indian River Shores and the City of Vero Beach for approval of
the Addendum by those municipalities, as recommended in the
Memorandum.
June 9, 1998
13
BOOK 106 PAGE 21
Bou 106 PAcE 22
MOTION WAS MADE by Commissioner Ginn, SECONDED
by Commissioner Eggert that if the negotiations of FCT for the
purchase of Lost Tree Islands is unproductive, that the
negotiations be moved back to the County.
Under discussion, Vice Chairman Macht stated that if the FCT negotiations fail, the
appraisals will be released and everybody will know the amounts and he predicted it would
be very interesting. He recommended that the Board wait until that time before proceeding
with any further motions or involvement.
Commissioners Ginn and Eggert agreed.
Commissioner Adams believed amotion ofthis sort would handicap the effort ofFCT
and undercut their ability to negotiate.
MOTION AND SECOND WITHDRAWN.
COPY OF PARTIALLY EXECUTED ADDENDUM VIII ON FILE
IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
7.E. Sebastian Area -Wide Scrub Jay Habitat Conservation Plan
Development - Consultant Rankings - Smith Environmental Services
Ranked First
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of June 2, 1998:
TO: James E. Chandler
County Administrator
DEP TMENT HEAD CONCURRENCE:
y
Robert .Keating, AI
Community Development IN
FROM: Roland M. DeBlois CP
Chief, Environmental Planning
DATE: June 2, 1998
SUBJECT: Board Consideration of Consultant Rankings for Development of a
Sebastian Area -Wide Scrub Jay Habitat Conservation Plan (HCP)
June 9, 1998
14
It is requested that the information herein presented be given formal consideration by the Board of
County Commissioners at its regular meeting of June 9, 1998.
The Board of County Commissioners, at its meeting of December 9, 1997, authorized staff to
develop a scope of services and issue a Request for Proposals (RFP) for professional services
relating to development of a Sebastian area -wide scrub jay Habitat Conservation Plan (HCP). The
purpose of the proposed HCP is to obtain an "incidental take" permit from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service (FWS) to release for development ±450 privately owned platted scrub lots in Sebastian
Highlands Subdivision, using publicly owned scrub land for mitigation credit to offset the
development impacts of the platted scrub lots (see attached minutes).
On February 25, 1998, county staff issued RFP # 8047 to solicit the services of a consultant to
undertake development of the HCP. After the closing date for the RFP of March 18, 1998, the county
administrator appointed a selection committee to select a final candidate for approval by the Board.
The committee members are: Roland DeBlois, Robert. Keating, Mike Jennings (U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service), Greg Smith (Indian River School Board), and Tracy Hass (Sebastian City
Planning).
Eleven consulting firms responded to the RFP by the closing date. After reviewing the eleven
submitted proposals, the selection committee established a "short list" of four firms. The four firms
on the short list are: Kimley-Horn and Associates (Vero Beach); Environmental Management
Systems (Altamonte Springs); Dames and Moore (Tampa); and Smith Environmental Services
(Merritt Island). On May 15, 1998, the four fines on the short list gave presentations to the selection
committee. The selection committee has since evaluated the four firms and has ranked the firms as
follows:
1. Smith Environmental Services
2. Kimley-Horn and Associates
3. Dames and Moore
4. Environmental Management Systems
If the Board concurs with the selection committee's ranking, staff will negotiate a contract with the
top ranked consultant. If negotiations with the top ranked consultant are unsuccessful, staff will then
negotiate with the second ranked firm. This procedure conforms with the Consultants Competitive
Negotiation Act (CCNA), which procedures the County generally uses in its selection of consultants.
Once a contract has been negotiated, staff will bring the contract to the Board for its approval.
Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners approve the consultant selection
committee's rankings of consultants for the HCP project. Staff further recommends that the Board
authorize staff to negotiate a contract with the top ranked consultant.
Minutes excerpt of December 9, 1997 BCC meeting
HCP/ RFP Scope of Services
June 9, 1998
15
BOOK 106 PACE id
bou 106 P -An 24 7
ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert; SECONDED BY
Commissioner Grin, the Board unanimously approved the
consultant selection committee's rankings of consultants for the
HCP project and authorized staff to negotiate a contract with the
top ranked consultant, Smith Environmental Services, as
recommended in the Memorandum.
7.F. WindsorProertieslnc. -Planned Development (PD) Final Plat
Approval for Block 30 (Windsor Plat 17�
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of June 3, 1998:
TO: James E. Chandler
County Administrator
DIVISION HEAD CONCURRENCE:
Robert M. Keating, AICPJ
Community Development Director
THROUGH: Stan Boling, CP
Planning Director
FROM: John W. McCoy, AICP M
Senior Planner, Current Development
DATE: June 3, 1998
SUBJECT: Windsor Properties Inc.'s Request for Planned Development (PD) Final Plat
Approval for Block 30 (Windsor Plat 17)
It is requested that the data herein presented be given formal consideration by the Board of County
Commissioners at its regular meeting of June 9, 1998.
Block 30 of Windsor is a 2 lot subdivision of a 3.22 acre parcel of land located on the east side of
SR AIA (see attachment #2). The subject property is zoned RS -3, Residential Single Family (up
to 3 units/acre) and has a land use designation of L-1, Low Density 1 (up to 3 units/acre). The
density of the subdivision is .62 units per acre.
June 9, 1998
IR
0 •
•
0
On February 27, 1997, the Planning and Zoning Commission granted PD preliminary plat approval
for Windsor Block 30. That plat conformed to the previously approved Windsor conceptual PD plan
for the overall project. The developer, Windsor Properties Inc., subsequently obtained a land
development permit for the Block 30 area and has completed construction of the required
subdivision improvements. The developer is now requesting PD final plat approval and has
submitted the following:
1. A final plat in conformance with the approved PD preliminary plat.
2. A certificate of completion for all required improvements.
3. A contract for construction for off-site improvements.
4. A cash escrow agreement.
ANALYSIS:
All required subdivision improvements have been completed and the developer has obtained a
certificate of completion from Public Works certifying that all required improvements are complete
and acceptable, with the exception of a sidewalk along the project's SR AlA frontage. A contract
for construction and letter of credit have been approved by the county attorney, guaranteeing future
construction of the sidewalk. Public Works has approved the cost estimate for the proposed
construction. All subdivision improvements are privately dedicated with the exception of the utility
system, which is separately warranted through the Department of Utility Services. Therefore, no
subdivision warranty and maintenance agreement is required. All requirements of PD final plat
approval are satisfied.
Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners grant PD final plat approval for the
Windsor Plat 17, authorize the chairman to sign the contract for construction, and accept the cash
escrow to guarantee the construction.
TTACHMENT
1. Application
2. Location Map
3. Final Plat
4. Contract for Construction with Cash Deposit & Escrow Agreement (copies)
June 9, 1998
17
BOOK 106 PAIGE 25
BOOK 106 FACE 6
ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED BY
Commissioner Grin, the Board unanimously granted final plat
approval for the Windsor Plat 17, authorized the Chairman to
sign the contract for construction, and accepted the cash escrow
to guarantee the construction, as recommended in the
Memorandum.
COPY OF CONTRACT FOR CONSTRUCTION OF REQUIRED RHROVEMENTS
& CASH DEPOSIT AND ESCROW AGREEIVE TT ON FILE
IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
7.G. Children's Home Society Lease Agreement (Former Youth
Manor Site
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of May 28, 1998:
Date: May 28, 1998 CONSENT AGENDA
To: Honorable Board of County Commissioners
Thru: James E. Chandler
County Administrator
1
From: H.T. "Sony+" Dean, Director
r
Department of General Services
Subject: County Owned Property (Former Youth Manor Site) - Lease Agreement
BACKGROUND:
At their regular meeting on May 12, 1998, the Board approved leasing of the subject property to Children's
Home Society, Treasure Coast Division, for a period of ten years as recommended by staff.
The attached Lease Agreement has been prepared by the County Attorney's office with insurances as
recommended by Risk Management.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends approval of the attached lease as submitted and requests authorization for the Chairman
to execute the document.
June 9, 1998
18
C.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED BY
Commissioner Ginn, the Board unanimously approved the lease
as submitted and authorized the Chairman to execute the
document, as recommended in the Memorandum.
LEASE AGREEMENT IS ON FILE
IN TAE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
7.H. Miscellaneous Budget Amendment 020
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of June 2, 1998:
TO: Members of the Board
of County Commissioners
DATE: June 2, 1998
SUBJECT: MISCELLANEOUS BUDGET AMENDMENT 020
CONSENT AGENDA
FROM: Joseph A. Baird
OMB Director
DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS
The attached budget amendment is to appropriate funding for the following:
The State of Florida, Department of Labor, has charged Indian River County for
Unemployment Compensation payments to former employees for the quarter ending
March 31, 1998. A budget amendment is required to reflect these payments: (Memo
attached from Interim Personnel Director, Tom Bisaillon).
2. The Engineering Department's 1989 station wagon was recently involved in an accident
(they were not at fault). The insurance company has paid $1,693.70 towards repairing
or replacing the vehicle. This vehicle was scheduled for replacement in the 1998/99 fiscal
year. The replacement cost is estimated at $19,100. The attached entry appropriates
funding for the replacement of the vehicle from the Transportation contingency.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners approve the attached budget amendment.
June 9, 1998
M
•
BOOK M, PAGE 27
BOOK 106 Pa,a 28
ON MOTION by Commissioner. Eggert, SECONDED BY
Commissioner Grin, the Board unanimously approved
Miscellaneous Budget Amendment 020, as recommended in the
Memorandum.
TO. Members of the Board RECEIVED BUDGET AMENDMENT: 020
of Cowq Commiss►yners JUN - 8 im
FROM: Joseph A. Bail `grit
t'(J,�NVO THE 8OM DATE: June 2. 1998
OMB Direcor ���+++"'
Entry
Number
Fupds/DepartmwWAccount Name
AccountNumber
Lmrease
Decrease
1.
EXPENSE
GENERAL FUND/Recreation/
Unemployment Compensation
001-108-572-012.15
$11
so
GENERAL. FUND/Personnel
Unemployment Compensation
001-203-513-012.15
$2,250
$0
GENERAL FUND/Supervisor of Elections/
Uamploymeat Compensation
001-700-519-012.15
$2
$0
GENERAL FUND/Reserve for Contingency
001-199-581-099.91
$0
$2,263
TRANSPORTATION FUND/Roads and
Bridges/Unemployment Compensation
111-214-541-012.15
$140
$0
TRANSPORTATION FUND/Roads and
Bridges/Resorve for Contingency
111-199-581-099.91
$0
$140
EMERGENCY SERVICES DISTRICT/Fire
Services/Unemploy nm Compensation
114-120-522-012.15
$2,643
$0
EMERGENCY SERVICES DISTRICT/Fuc
Services/Reserve for Contingency
114-120-522-099.91
$0
$2,643
GOLF COURSE/Operations/
Unemployment Compensation
418-221-572-012:15
$55
$0
GOLF COURSE/ClubhousdDepreciation
418-221-572-036.61
$0
$55
UTILITIES/Water/
Unemploymem Compensation
471-219-536-012.15
$42
$0
UTILITIES/Worlter's Compensation
471-219-536-012.14
$0
$42
LrnL1 TES/General/
Unemploymcet Compensation
471-235-536-012.15
$139
$0
UITLXnES/WorWs Compensation
471-235-536-012.14
$0
$139
S.W.D.D./L.andBW
Unonployment Compensation
411-255-534-012.15
$1,183
$0
S.W.D.D t Contributions
411-255-534-012.12
$0
$1,183
2.
EXPENSE
TRANSPORTATION FUND/Enginwing/
Automobile
111-244-541-066.42
$19,100
$0
TRANSPORTATION FUND/
Reserve for Contingency
111-199-581-099.91
$0
$19,100
June 9, 1998
20
U. Payments to Vendors of Court -Related Costs
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of June L 1998:
TO: Board of County Commissioners
FROM: Terrence P. O'Brien, Assistant County Attorney
DATE: June 1, 1998
SUBJECT: Payments to Vendors of Court Related Costs
The Office of the County Attorney has processed and approved payment to the following vendors
for the weeks of May 18, and May 25,1998. Listed below are the vendors names and the amount
of each court related costs.
Peggy Gollnick
Howard Porter
Fariwinds Travel
Edward Abard, III
James T. Long, Esq.
James T. Long, Esq.
James T. Long, Esq.
Treasure Coast Court Rept.
Peggy Gollnick
Debby Thomas
Peggy Gollnick
Debby Thomas
Debby Thomas
Linda R. Phillips
Debby Thomas
Shelia I. Flinn
J R Reporting Associates
Shirley E. Corbin
Shirley E. Corbin
Shelia I. Flinn
Carlos Wells
Barbara G. Schopp
Sheldon H. Rifkin, Ph.D.
Floyd Evans
Peggy Gollnick
Raymond Tattegrain
Medical Record Services
Shelia I. Flinn
Shirley E. Corbin
Total
Transcription
Witness reimbursement
Travel
Travel
Felony - Public Defender
Juvenile - Public Defender
Misd. - Public Defender
Transcription
Transcription
Transcription
Transcription
Transcription
Transcription
Transcription
Transcription
Transcription
Transcription
Transcription
Transcription
Transcription
Mileage
Transcription
Expert Witness
Court Interpreter
Transcription
Court Interpreter
Record research
Transcription
Transcription
NO ACTION REQUIRED OR TAKEN.
June 9, 1998
21
BOOK.
35.00
18.00
144.00
39.04
5,400.00
1,200.00
900.00
45.00
35.00
28.00
189.00
31.50
45.50
45.50
21.00
73.50
220.00
31.50
45.00
52.50
19.72
91.00
400.00
25.00
241.50
75.00
14.78
157.50
63.00
$9,686.54
10 PAGE
sash 106 P'nE 30 1
7.J. Recently Acquired Pro�ertl'es (4) - Tax Cancellations -1)�
43rd Avenue (Carwash West. Inc.); 2) R/W Willow Street MaSilva�,:
3) R/W CR 510 - (Graves Brothers Co.): 4) R/W 66th Avenue -
Peterson
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of June 1, 1998:
TO: Board of County Commissioners
t'ui � f *4—LL -
FROM: Lea R. Keller, CLA
Legal Assistant - County Attorney's Office
DATE: June 1, 1998
RE: 4 Recently Acquired Properties - Tax Cancellations
The County recently acquired some property and, pursuant to Section 196.28, F.S., the
Board of County Commissioners, after formally accepting it, is allowed to cancel and
discharge any taxes owed on the portion of the property acquired for public purpose. Such
cancellation must be done by resolution with a certified copy being forward to the Tax
Collector (along with copies sent to the Property Appraiser and Fixed Assets).
Reouested Action: Board authorize the Chairman to sign the attached resolutions canceling
taxes upon lands the County recently acquired.
Attachments: Resolutions with legals -
RNV - 43rd Ave. - Carwash West, Inc.
RNV - Willow St., Fellsmere - DaSllva
RNV - CR 510 - Graves Brothers Co.
RNV - 66th Ave. - Peterson
ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED BY
Commissioner Ginn, the Board unanimously adopted Resolution
No. 98-62 canceling certain delinquent taxes upon publicly
owned lands, pursuant to Section 196.28 Florida Statutes. (r/w
43' Avenue, Carwash West, Inc.)
June 9, 1998
22
Re: RNV - 43rd Avenue
Parcel IDs #0433-39-00010-0000-00003.0
CARWASH WEST, INC.
RESOLUTION NO. 98- 6 2
A RESOLUTION OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA,
CANCELLING CERTAIN DELINQUENT TAXES UPON
PUBLICLY OWNED LANDS, PURSUANT TO SECTION 196.28,
FLORIDA STATUTES.
WHEREAS, Section 196.28. Florida Statutes, allows the Board of County Commissioners
of each County to cancel and discharge The right of way is hereby accepted and any and all liens
for taxes, delinquent or current, held or owned by the county or the state, upon lands heretofore or
hereafter conveyed to or acquired by any agency, governmental subdivision, or municipality of the
state, or the United States, for road purposes, defense purposes, recreation, reforestation, or other
public use; and
WHEREAS, such cancellation must be by resolution of the Board of County
Commissioners, duly adopted and entered upon its minutes properly describing such lands and
setting forth the public use to which the same are or will be devoted; and
WHEREAS, upon receipt of a certified copy ' of such resolution, proper officials of the
county and of the state are authorized, empowered, and directed to make proper entries upon the
records to accomplish such cancellation and to do all things necessary to carry out the provisions
of Section 196.28, F.S.;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that:
The right of way is hereby accepted and any and all liens for taxes, delinquent or current,
against the property described in OR Book 1209, Page 2249, which was recently acquired by
Indian River County for future right of way are hereby canceled, pursuant to the authority of
Section 196.28, F.S.
2. The Clerk to the Board of County Commissioners is hereby directed to send a certified copy
of this resolution to the Tax Collector and the Property Appraiser.
The resolution was moved for adoption by Commissioner _Ee r t , and the motion was
seconded by Commissioner G i n n , and, upon being put to a vote, the vote was as
follows:
Chairman John W. Tippin Aye
Vice Chairman Kenneth R. Macht Aye
Commissioner Carolyn K. Eggert Ay e
Commissioner Caroline D. Ginn Aye
Commissioner Fran B. Adams Aye
The Chairman thereupon declared the resolution duly passed and adopted this 9 t h day of
June, 1998.
Attest_J, K. Barton, Clerk
-AX CERTIFICATES OUTSTANDING
{i4ENT PRORATED TP..' RECEIVED AND
.:POSITED WITH TAX CO! LECTOR
June 9, 1998
.e.
yeS no
S
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
23
By `l Z c •1 &Af
John W. Ti 0 i
Chairman
�inean R.vv ca Ac,;roved � :
I.-AdT r..l Il 3
rW i
I Fit
I nisr, t�"ar. i" -
BOOK 106 PAGE ��
0
is
a
CERTIFICATION 19TH STREET a
1.O
Charles A. Cromer, hereby certify that I am a registered Professional Surveyor and Mapper licensed to practice in the state 3
of Florida, that this sketch was made under my immediate supervision, and that it is accurate and correct. I further certify z
that this sketch meets the Minimum Technical standards as described in Chapter 61G17 of the Florida Administrative Code. a
pursuant to F.S. Chapter 472.
THIS IS NOT A SURVEY
SKETCH TO ACCOMPANY LEGAL DESCRIPTION
Charles A. Cromer, P.S.M. Reg. #4094 1840 25th St, Vero Beach, FL 32960 PREPARED FOR INDIAN RIVER COUNTY ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT a
Indian River County Surveyor (561) 567-8000
Date 7 QOn►/ 19-,9 g
91,
Cz
...
Scale:
I =.30
c
140'
k
Lot 2
a -
I
132.5'
25'
Z
5
—
Plot
c '
O
-�
to
I
I o
M
«I
a
�
Ln Lot 22
Lot 3
-
aI
a
^
w
r`
I
O
Z
0
L,4jl
I
Q
LU
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
�
The West 5 feet of the East
20 feet ofCD
132.5
I
�I
�F
Lot 3, Pinewood Subdivision, according
to
Lot 4
a
o�
the plot recorded in Plat Book
2, Page 89
of the Public Records of Indian
River County,
t.2
Florida.
Lying in Indian River County,
Florida.N
cd
a
o
— — — —
J
a.
a
CERTIFICATION 19TH STREET a
1.O
Charles A. Cromer, hereby certify that I am a registered Professional Surveyor and Mapper licensed to practice in the state 3
of Florida, that this sketch was made under my immediate supervision, and that it is accurate and correct. I further certify z
that this sketch meets the Minimum Technical standards as described in Chapter 61G17 of the Florida Administrative Code. a
pursuant to F.S. Chapter 472.
THIS IS NOT A SURVEY
SKETCH TO ACCOMPANY LEGAL DESCRIPTION
Charles A. Cromer, P.S.M. Reg. #4094 1840 25th St, Vero Beach, FL 32960 PREPARED FOR INDIAN RIVER COUNTY ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT a
Indian River County Surveyor (561) 567-8000
Date 7 QOn►/ 19-,9 g
91,
Cz
ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED BY
Commissioner Ginn, the Board unanimously adopted Resolution
No. 98-63 canceling certain delinquent taxes upon publicly
owned lands, pursuant to Section 196.28 Florida Statutes. (R/W
Willow Street - DaSilva)
Re: RNV - Willow sheet, Fellsmere
Parcel IIS /00-31-37-00011-1964.00001.0
DaSiIva
RESOLUTION NO. 98- 6 3
A RESOLUTION OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA,
CANCELLING CERTAIN DELINQUENT TAXES UPON
PUBLICLY OWNED LANDS, PURSUANT TO SECTION 196.28,
FLORIDA STATUTES.
WHEREAS, Section 196.28, Florida Statutes, allows the Board of County Commissioners
of each County to cancel and discharge The right of way.is hereby accepted and any and all liens
for taxes, delinquent or current, held or owned by the county or the state, upon lands heretofore or
hereafter conveyed to or acquired by any agency, governmental subdivision, or municipality of the
state, or the United States, for road purposes, defense purposes, recreation, reforestation, or other
- public use; and
WHEREAS, such cancellation must be by resolution of the Board of County
Commissioners, duly adopted and entered upon its minutes properly describing such lands and
setting forth the public use to which the same are or will be devoted, and
WHEREAS, upon receipt of a certified copy of such resolution, proper officials of the
county and of the state are authorized, empowered, and directed to make proper entries upon the
records to accomplish such cancellation and to do all things necessary to carry out the provisions
of Section 196.28, F.S.;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that:
1. The right of way Is hereby accepted and any and all liens for taxes, delinquent or current,
against the property described in OR Book 1208, Page 2238, which was recently acquired by
Indian River County for future right of way are hereby canceled, pursuant to the authority of
Section 196.28, F.S.
2. The Clerk to the Board of County Commissioners is hereby directed to send a certffled copy
of this resolution to the Tax Collector and the Property Appraiser.
The resolution was moved for adoption by Commissioner F g g P- r t , and the motion was
seconded by Commissioner G i n n and, upon being put to a vote, the vote was as
follows:
Chairman John W. Tippin Aye
Vice Chairman Kenneth R. Macht Aye
Commissioner Carolyn K Eggert Aye
Commissioner Caroline D. Ginn Aye
Commissioner Fran B. Adams Aye
The Chairman thereupon declared the resolution duly passed and adopted this ,SIL day of
June, 1998.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
Atteo--J.. K Barton, Clerk
BY
By: ``" John W. Tippiri
e . Chairman
1 Ipl¢TI hrvel v] A(,t(OY 80 I y._.c ,
TAX CERTIFICATES OST=TAS'"e'itC I AJmin
yeSno G IG 3
I Leee� � I
W PROP, 17 ED
DEPOSITED WTH TAX COLLE071 OR
June 9, 1998
25
BOOK. �V �d FADEta
i
N
G1
0
00
Homewood 5/'o
TI -CCI 1954
PCH of Lots 14 &
40'
L _ _
16
w///0 w 51re R/W (P/C}�
In
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
0
C�
GRAPH SCALE
The
West
15 feet of the North 15.5
feet of Lot
the
West
15 feet of Lot 16 of Tract
1954 of the
Subdivision,
as recorded in Plot Book
2, Page 15
the
Public
Records of Saint Lucie County, Florida.
Said
land
lids in Indian River County
Florida
CERTIFICATION
I, Charles A. Cramer, hereby certify that I am o registered Pfofessionol Surveyor and Mapper
licensed to practice in the slate of Florida, that this sketch•'wo' rnade under my immediate
supervision, and that it is occurate and correct. I further'eerti' that -this sketch megts the
Minimum Technical standards as described in Chapter 61817 `of the f lorida Administrative Code,
pursuant to F.S. Chapter 41'1.
Chorles A. Cromer. 11.1i ki I?VO. 04094 - 1H40 251h 5t.,, ver o(teorh, Ft. ,i?Il(i0 .......
Indian River Cowity `surveyor (401') 561 A(]pp
c
Lof
14 and
Homewood
of
15'
T
PREPARED FOR INDIAN
ENGINEERING F,'
THIS IS NOI
SKF1Clf 10 ACCOMPANY
Date Q r h
Port or Parcel N—her ()a .11 .1/ 0(,U11 19h4 (100(It ,l
AUIOCAD IIII. GRII (;�91)S�IAi(�1y',�tlthpWl.
� M "
•
ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED BY
Commissioner Ginn, the Board unanimously adopted Resolution
No. 98-64 cancelling certain delinquent taxes upon publicly
owned lands, pursuant to Section 196.28 Florida Statutes. (R/W
CR 510 - Graves Brothers Co.)
Re: Rf W - County Road 510
Parcel IDS 033-31-39-00001-0020-00004.1
Graves Brothers Co.
RESOLUTION NO. 98 --EA—
A RESOLUTION OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA,
CANCELLING CERTAIN DELINQUENT TAXES UPON
PUBLICLY OWNED LANDS, PURSUANT TO SECTION 196.28,
FLORIDA STATUTES.
WHEREAS, Section 196.28, Florida Statutes, allows the Board of County Commissioners
of each County to cancel and discharge The right of way is hereby accepted and any and all liens
for taxes, delinquent or current, held or owned by the county or the state, upon lands heretofore or
hereafter conveyed to or acquired by any agency, govemmental subdivision, or municipality of the
state, or the United States, for road purposes, defense purposes, recreation, reforestation, or other
public use,, and
WHEREAS, such cancellation must be by resolution of the Board of County
Commissioners, duly adopted and entered upon its minutes properly describing such lands and
setting forth the public use to which the same are or will be devoted; and
WHEREAS, upon receipt of a certified copy of such resolution, proper officials of the
county and of the state are authorized, empowered, and directed to make proper entries upon the
records to accomplish such cancellation and to do all things necessary to carry out the provisions
of Section 196.28, F.S.;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that:
1. The right of way Is hereby accepted and any and all liens for taxes, delinquent or current,
against the property described in OR Book I A /$L , Page Q(.21 which was recently
acquired by Indian River County for future right of way are hereby canceled, pursuant to the
authority of Section 196.28, F.S.
2. The Clerk to the Board of County Commissioners is hereby directed to send a certified copy
of this resolution to the Tax Collector and the Property Appraiser.
The resolution was moved for adoption by Commissioner E a U e r t . and the motion was
seconded by Commissioner G i n n and, upon being put to a vote, the vote was as
follows:
Chairman John W. Tippin Aye
Vice Chairman Kenneth R. Macht Aye
Commissioner Carolyn K Eggetrt Aye
Commissioner Caroline D. Ginn Aye
Commissioner Fran B. Adams Aye
The Chairman thereupon declared the resolution duly passed and adopted this _Dt.lL day of
June, 1998.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
Attssh�J.X Barton,.Clerk _ —�•
By John W. Td pi
ri
ci/o/ f `bi �.-, Chairman
I TAX CERTIFICATES GU -r7. ",DI,,'G i �-�=�^ 1 Y• c� Accrovaa pa,a
I 155I Aam:n 3
.:'#"' ff PRORATE -11 r : , v-1,"..., - n t Lp.irc - 1
'
Cif PC -SITED WITH TAX C;.i_L[OTOr I iJtcl. - 1
i Rtsic kqr. i
June 9, 1998
27
•
BOOK M6 PACE 35
LJ
N
00
•
M
x
CD
PdRCE1_ *R
P.O.B. C.R. 510
NW Corner Lot 6
O N. Line Lot 6
Curve Data p
12 12.90'LOT 6
R = 2831.79' p
R = O'os'34" k GRAVES � 8" ADDITION TO WABASSO
L 7.89' ' E� .BLOCK 2
C.B. = S 2'33'49" E
5?5� Scale: 1"=5'
i
LEGAL. DESCRIPTION
Begin of the Northwest corner of Lot 6, Block 2 as shown on the plot of the Grove's Addition to Wobosso. Florida,
as recorded in the Plot Book 2. Page 41 of the Public Records of Indian River County, Florida, the said point lying in
the arc of a 2831.79—foot radius curve, concave to the East, whose chord bears S 2'33'49" E. and run
Along the curve, through a central angle of 0'09'34", on arc distance of 7.89 feet to a point. Then run '
N 575417* 7" E, o distance of 14.81 feet to o point in the North line of the said Lot 6. Then run
Along the said North line, a distance of 12.90 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING.
Containing 50.79 square feet.
Lying in Indian River County, Florida.
CERTIFICATION
1, Charles A. Cromer, hereby certify that I am a registered Professional Surveyor and Mapper licensed to practice in the state
Of Florida, that this sketch was mode under my immediate supervision, and that it is accurate and correct. I further certify
that this sketch meets the Minimum Technical standards as described in Chapter 61 G 17 of the Florida Administrative Code,
pursuant to F.S. Chapter 472.
Charles A. Cromer, P.S.M. Reg. #4094
Indian River County Surveyor
1840 25th St, Vero Beach, FL 32960
(407) 567-8000
PREPARED FOR INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
THIS IS NOT A SURVEY
SKETCH TO ACCOMPANY LEGAL DESCRIPTION
Date 74//a4/ !
W
SNO
Ou
Cl
0
Sm
M
x
.1 NW Corner Lot 6
Norti
10 S 89'57'06" E 33.18'
P.O.B:
GRAVE'S ADDITION
BLOCK 2
= LOT 6
C.R. 510
N
TO WABASSO
FAKL;hL ,iS'4
Scale:
W
S9.39'42
LEGJIL DESCRIPTION
Begin at a point lying in the North line of Lot 6, Block 2 of Grove's Addition. to Wabosso. Florida, according to
the plot recorded in Plot Book 2, Page 41 of the Public Records of Indian River County, Florida, the said point
lying S 89'57'06" E. o distance of 33.18 feet from the Northwest corner of the said Lot 6. Then run
Along the North line of Lot 6, S 89'57'06" E. a distance of 67.95 feet to a point. Then run
S 7939'42" W. o distance of 25.08 feet too
point. Then run
N 83'59'37" W. a distance of 43.52 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING.
Containing 153.73 square feet.
Lying in Indian River County, Florida.
CERIFICATION
1, Charles A. Cromer, hereby certify that I am o registered Professional Surveyor .and Mapper licensed to practice in the state
of Florida,. that this sketch was made under my immediate supervision. and that it is accurate and correct. I further certify
that this sketch meets the Minimum Technical standards as described in Chapter 61G17 of the Florida Administrative Code.
Pursuant to F.S, Chapter 472.
Charles A. Cramer, P.S.M. Reg. #4094 1840 25th St. Vero Beach, FL 32960
Indian River County Surveyor
(407) 567-8000
PREPARED FOR INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
THIS IS NOT A SURVEY
SKETCH TO ACCOMPANY LEGAL DESCRIPTION
Data
Q
•
i
w
O
0
.C.R. 510 0
N 89'56'07" W p 66.06'
Line S 89'56'07" E X
35.92' c 1 fri
sir. oC2
0
D0,, z �
PARCE I_ *5-
P.O.C.
NW Corner
Lot 6— _ Scale. 1"=20'
GRAVE'S ADDITION TO WABASSO, FLORIDA
BLOCK 2
LOT 6
CURVE
DELTA
RADIUS
ARC
CHORD BRG
C 1
0'43'52"
2897.79
36.98
S
02'47'30"
E
C2
0'32'00"
2897.79
26.98
S
02'53'26"
E
ce,(Z-V��
Charles A. Cromer, P.S.M. Reg. #4094
Indian River County Surveyor
1840 25th St, Vero Beach, FL 32960
(407) 567-8000.
PREPARED FOR INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT c
THIS IS NOT A SURVEY o
SKETCH TO ACCOMPANY LEGAL DESCRIPTION a
Date 7 e,:?j/ 199 6
r
LEGAL DESCRIPTION P•O.B.
Q•
�D
Commence at the Northwest corner of Lot 6, Block 2 of Grove's Addition to Wobosso.
in Plot Book 2, Page 41 of the Public
g to the plot recorded
Florida, accordinCD
Records of Indian River County. Florida, and run N 89'56'07" W. crossing Old Dixie
Highway, a distance of 66.06 feet to a point lying in the 2897.79—foot
orc of a radius
chord bears S 2'47'30" E. and run
curve, concave to the East, whose
Along the curve, through a central angle of 0'43'52", on orc distance of 36.98 feet to
of Old Dixie, and the POINT OF BEGINNING. Then
a point in the West right—of—woy
run
N 54'07'00" W, a distance of 46.01 feet to a point in the South right—of—woy line of
S 89'56'07" E, along the said South
C.R. 510. Then run
right—of—woy line, a distance of 35.92 feet to a
curve. Then run
point in the aforementioned
Along the curve, through o central angle of 0'32'00", on orc distance of 26.98 feet to
Containing 483.00 square feet.
the POINT OF BEGINNING.
Lying in Indian River County, Florida.
CERTIMCATION
o
1. Charles A. Cromer, hereby certify that I am a registered Professional Surveyor
of Florida, that this sketch
and Mo er epractice
dcorrreto
0
state cm
ecerti
was mode under my immediateervision, and that
that this sketch meets the Minimum Technical standards os -sup described in Chapter
it is accurate and ct further
611317 Florida
y o
pursuant to F.S. Chapter 472.
of the Administrative
Code,
_
J
ce,(Z-V��
Charles A. Cromer, P.S.M. Reg. #4094
Indian River County Surveyor
1840 25th St, Vero Beach, FL 32960
(407) 567-8000.
PREPARED FOR INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT c
THIS IS NOT A SURVEY o
SKETCH TO ACCOMPANY LEGAL DESCRIPTION a
Date 7 e,:?j/ 199 6
ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED BY
Commissioner Ginn, the Boardunanimously adopted Resolution
98-65 cancelling certain delinquent taxes upon publicly owned
lands, pursuant to Section 196.28 Florida Statutes. (R/W 661
Avenue - Peterson)
Re: RAN - 88th Avenue
Parcel ID 031-32-39-00001-0080-000020
PETERSON
RESOLUTION NO. 98--65
A RESOLUTION OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA,
CANCELLING CERTAIN DELINQUENT TAXES UPON
PUBLICLY OWNED LANDS, PURSUANT TO SECTION 196.28,
FLORIDA STATUTES.
WHEREAS, Section 196.28, Florida Statutes, allows the Board of County Commissioners
of each County to cancel and discharge The right of way is hereby accepted and any and all liens
for taxes, delinquent or current, held or owned by the county or the state, upon lands heretofore or
hereafter conveyed to or acquired by any agency, governmental subdivision, or municipality of the
state, or the United States, for road purposes, defense purposes, recreation, reforestation, or other
public use; and
WHEREAS, such cancellation must be by resolution of the Board of County
Commissioners, duly adopted and entered upon its minutes properly describing such lands and
setting forth the public use to which the same are or will be devoted; and
WHEREAS, upon receipt of a certified copy of such resolution, proper officials of the
county and of the state are authorized, empowered, and directed to make proper entries upon the
records to accomplish such cancellation and to do all things necessary to carry out the provisions
of Section 196.28, F.S.;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that:
1. The right of way Is hereby accepted and any and all liens for taxes, delinquent or current,
against the property described in OR Book lain , Page o1b13 which was recently
acquired by Indian River County for future right of way are hereby canceled, pursuant to the
authority of Section 196.28, F.S.
2. The Clerk to the Board of County Commissioners is hereby directed to send a certified copy
of this resolution to the Tax Collector and the Property Appraiser.
The resolution was moved for adoption by Commissioner E g go r t . and the motion was
seconded by Commissioner r, i n n and, upon being put to a vote, the vote was as
follows:
Chairman John W. Tippin Aye
Vice Chairman Kenneth R. Macht Aye
Commissioner Carolyn K. Eggert Aye
Commissioner Caroline D. Ginn Aye
Commissioner Fran B. Adams Aye
The Chairman thereupon declared the resolution duly passed and adopted this 91 h day of
June, 1998.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
AttgsL.J, K. Barton, Clerk " �—
By
John W. Tippi
Chairman
AX CERTIFICATES OLITS':APeOIIdG L.� Aar �Ye �o ' �ccrurea ud
� Aam,n
ies no 3 ye
Leg-
EPOSITED 14 !T H tAX CCL&.=CTOR •-� I uev i.
Fisk Mgr. �
June 9, 1998
31
BOOK 196 PACE 39
•
CI
!D
I
r0
F+I
�O
00
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
The East 25 feet of Tract
Scale: I"= 150,
8, Section 31, Township 32 I
South, Range 39 East,
according to the lost }�
general plot of the lands
4—
of the Indian River Forms
1—r—�
�
Company recorded in Plot
Book
I 1
2, Page 25 of the
\i
/�
Public Records of St. Lucie q IL",
ri
County. Florida. c
N
LESS the South 30 feet.
m
'
._
Containing 32.230 square v I
CD
feet. or 0.74 acres. O .
Now lying in
Indian River
County, Florida. I
w
N
�
co
1289.2'
In
30.30
�roo
Tract
Line
a
j —
Section Line �o
OL
cERnFICATION I
L4TERAL
"A" (66TH AVENUE)
3
I, Charles A. Cromer, hereby certify that I am o registered
of Florida, that this sketch was made under my immediate
Professional
Surveyor and Mo actic
"y'
supervision,. and that it is accurate and correPractice
t
that this sketch meets the Minimum Technical standards as described n Chapter 61017
further certify
pursuant to F.S. Chapter 472.IJ
of the Florida Administrative Code.
1O
THIS IS NOT A SURVEY
SKETCH TO ACCOMPANY LEGAL DESCRIPTION
Charles A. Cromer. P.S.M. Reg. #4094
Indian
PREPARED FOR INDIAN RIVER COUNTY ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
1840 25th St. Vero Beach, FL
o
River County Surveyor
(561) 567-8000
32960
Dote /�• /�9A
c�
c'1
a
0
w
7.K. Shen
0 ice -Budget Amendment
The Board reviewed a Letter of June 2, 1998:
*berttt
GARY C. WHEELER • INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
MEMBER FLORIDA SHERIFFS' ASSOCIATION
MEMBER OF NATIONAL SHERIFFS' ASSOCIATION
4055 kk19120998 VERO BEACH, FLORIDA 32960-1808 PHONE (561) 569-6700
The Honorable John Tippin, Chairman
Board of County Commissioners
Indian River County
1840 25th Street
Vero Beach, FL 32960-3394
Re: Budget Adjustment
Dear Mr. Tippin:
RECEIVED
JUN 0 3 1998
BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSION
This letter is a request to amend our fiscal year 1997-98 Operating Budget by $65,980. These funds
represent the revenue generated from the housing of Broward County inmates ($45,980), Polk County
inmates ($18,515) and Immigration and Naturalization Services inmates ($1,485) for the month of May,
1998. The monies will replace Corrections' funds used to house the inmates, provide match for a
previously approved Block Grant and purchase Capital Outlay items.
The budget amendment will be distributed as follows:
Block Grant Match $ 9,917
Law Enforcement Capital
(1) Full Size Sedan @ 19,657 19,657
(8) Radar Unit @ 1,776 14,208
Balance For Future Radar Purchase 1,228
Corrections 20,970
Total $ 65,980
I am requesting this item be placed on the "Consent Agenda" at your earliest convenience.
If you have any questions or any further information is required, please let me know.
Sincerely,
Gary C. Wheeler, Sheriff
GCW:mej
cc: Joseph A. Baird 00.10 -1 -It �
Richard Dees
The 173rd Internationally Accredited Law Enforcement Agency r
Accredited by the Commission on Accreditation for Law Enforcement Agencies, Incorporated
June 9, 1998
33
800k 10 PAGE 41
BOOK 106 PAGE 42
ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED BY
Commissioner Ginn, the Board unanimously approved the
amendment to Sheriffs FY 1997-98 Operating Budget by
$65,980, as requested in the Letter.
U. Sheriff Wheeler - Local Law Enforcement Block Grant
(LLEBG- 199 7 - Progress Report
The Board reviewed a Letter of June 3, 1998:
*berff f
C°
10A GARY C. WHEELER • INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
MEMBER FLORIDA SHERIFFS' ASSOCIATICN
MEMBER OF NATIONAL SHERIFFS' ASSOCIATION
405541 St AVENUE
VERO BEACH, FLORIDA32960-1808 PHONE (561) 569-6700
The Honorable John Tippin, Chairman
Board of County Commissioners
Indian River County
1840 25th Street
Vero Beach, FL 32960-3394
RE: LLEBG 1997 FOLLOW-UP PROGRESS REPORT
Dear Mr. Tippin:
Attached, please find the follow-up form to the administrative requirements of the 1997 Law
Enforcement Block Grant Program. This form requires your signature prior to the obligation of
funds, which were previously approved in December of 1997.
Should you have any questions, please feel free to call Sandy Shields at extension 396.
Sincerely,
6" Lvto-,Z—
-1�e7 Gary C. Wheeler, Sheriff
GCW:mej
Attachment _
No
11
The 173rd Internationally Accredited Law Enforcement Agency
Accredited by the Commission on Accreditation for Law Enforcement Agencies, Incorporated
June 9, 1998
34
•
ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED BY
Commissioner Ginn, the Board unanimously authorized the
Chairman to sign the follow-up information form, as requested
in the Letter.
COPY OF LLEBG FOLLOW-UP INFORMATION FORM ON FILE
IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
8. SHERIFF WHEELER -1998 COPS MORE GRANT
Undersheriff Jim Davis appeared on behalf of Sheriff Gary Wheeler and translated
the acronym COPS MORE as Community Oriented Policing Services - Making Officer
Redeployment Effective. He then reviewed a Letter of June 3, 1998:
6beriff
GARY C. WHEELER • INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
MEMBER FLORIDA SHERIFFS ASSOCIATION
MEMBER OF NATIONAL SHERIFFS' ASSOCIATION
405541 St AVENUE VERO BEACH, FLORIDA 32960-1808 PHONE (561) 569-6700
June 3, 1998
The Honorable John Tippin, Chairman
Board of County Commissioners
Indian River County
1840 25th Street
Vero Beach, FL 32960-3394
RE: COPS MORE Grant
Dear Mr. Tippin:
We are pleased to announce a grant opportunity that will allow the Sheriffs Office to civilianize four (4)
existing sworn positions resulting in the net gain of four positions on the road as patrol deputies. The
grant initiative is the 1998 COPS MORE grant funded through the U. S. Department of Justice,
Community Policing Office.
By replacing four sworn officers with civilians, the Sheriffs Office will be reducing the salary cost of the
current positions located in court house security and civil process, as well as ongoing equipment and
vehicle costs, which will not be required by civilian public service technicians. An additional benefit of
this redeployment is the realization of four additional sworn officers on the road to answer the ever
increasing calls for service.
June 9, 1998
35
BOOK 106 PAGE 43
BOOK 106 PACE
By approving our application to proceed in the qualification round, we will have the opportunity to
reduce our upcoming budget request. Each civilian position will cost $28,240.19 in salary/benefits, for a
total of $112,960.75 in the first year. The same number of entry level law enforcement officers will cost
$37,534 each for salaries/benefits, for a total of $150,136. Additionally, each sworn officer will require
$30,400 in capital start up costs for an additional amount of $121,600, or a total of $271,736. The
savings are estimated at over $158,000 plus the additional benefit of having four more deputies on the
road.
Attached is a copy of the grant and a sample letter of support that requires the Chairman's signature.
Your consideration of this request is appreciated. Should you have any questions, feel free to contact me.
Sincerely,
Gary�CZeeler, Sheriff
GCW:mej
Attachment
The 173rd Internationally Accredited Law Enforcement Agency
Accredited by the Commission on Accreditation for Law Enforcement Agencies, Incorporated
Undersheriff Davis advised that certain figures in the letter above need to be revised
because they were reconditioning cars instead of buying them. In the third paragraph, the
$1212600 (start up costs including 4 vehicles) should be decreased by $19,220, (2 deputies
already are assigned cars and 2 cars will be refurbished) and the $158,000 (savings estimate)
should be $123,616 if the grant is approved. He apologized for the last minute revision. He
then presented the following worksheet and explained the significance of the numbers in
relation to the request for a letter of support from the Board of County Commissioners
concerning this grant opportunity.
Indian River County Sheriffs Office
COPS More Grant
Worksheet
June 6,1998
Grant Request:
Salary & Benefits Per Position
$28,240
Civilian Public Services Technician'
Cost Of 4 Positions
112,961
Operating Costs ($2,000 per position)
8,000
Capital Outlay (Lap Tops For 4 Deputies @ $9,500 ea.)
38,000
Total Project Cost
$158,961
Grant Amount (75% of Salaries & Capital Outlay) $113,221
County Match (Includes Operating Costs) 45,740
$158,961
June 9, 1998
36
W
Grant Savings:
4 - Deputy Positions @ $37,534 (In 1998-99 Budget Request)
4 - Civilian Public Service Technician Positions (County Cost From Above)
Grant Savings
Other Budget Reductions:
Refurbish Two (2) fewer vehicles
Decrease in Employee Startup Costs
•
$150,136
45,740
$104,396
9,000
10,220
$123,616
Undersheriff Davis continued that two of the new civilian positions would be used to
replace two sworn employees in the Courthouse Security Unit and two sworn positions in
the Civil Unit. The four sworn officers will be transferred to the Uniform Division to assist
in handling the calls for services and work traffic -related problems. He also advised that the
grant is renewable for two additional years.
Vice Chairman Macht thought it sounded good and wondered why these positions had
not been civilianized previously, and Undersheriff Davis explained that traditionally
subpoenas have been served by sworn personnel. Now, non -enforceable papers will be
served by non -sworn personnel; enforceable papers will continue to be served by sworn
personnel.
UndersheriffDavis continued that in the Courthouse a sworn officer is monitoring the
security cameras for the entire building and he saw no reason why that could not be a
civilian. Also, one of the sworn officers at the Courthouse's security screening device could
be a civilian. There will be one sworn officer there.
MOTION WAS MADE by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED
BY Commissioner Ginn, to approve a letter of support to be
signed by the Chairman.
Under discussion, Commissioner Ginn asked why the lap tops were so expensive, and
Undersheriff Davis explained that they were "ruggedized" lap top computers, complete with
modem and communications software, which have docking stations in the patrol vehicle, but
can also be portable. The lap tops are not sensitive to heat, are waterproof, and have been
locally manufactured for military use.
June 9, 1998
37
BOOK N W PAGE 45
BOOK 106 UZE 46
The Chairman CALLED THE QUESTION and the motion
passed unanimously.
COPY OF LETTER OF SUPPORT AND GRANT DOCUMENTS ARE
ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
9.A.1. PUBLIC HEARING - MAGI INTERNATIONAL
MANAGEMENT CO. - REQUEST TO REZONE APPROXIMATELY
4.76 ACRES (OWNED BY HARRY W. CLAYTON FAMILY TRUST)
FROM CG TO PD (COMMERCIAL) AND REQUEST PRELIMINARY
PD PLAN/PLAT APPROVAL FOR A MENI STORAGE FACILITY (SR -
PRESS -JOURNAL
Published Daily
Vero Beach, Indian River County, Florida
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
COUNTY OF INDIAN RIVER: STATE OF FLORIDA'
Notice of hearing to consider
the adoption of a request to rezone
authority f
a proms' from CG (General
�� saysthathe P reid,,t the Press-iournal, a dally newspaper published at Vero Beach
to
Comm to PD commercial,
lo Indian River County, Florida; that the attached copy of advert, being
allowinngg mmini facilities as a
aC: < 4.
permitted use and 87,287 square
feet of mini storage building area
�yl1
on 4.76 acres. The subject property i
ti matter °}
is presently owned by The Harry
J
W. Clayton Family Trust,. and
located in Section 2, Township 33
and Range 38. Sea the above map,
in the Cast, was pub-
for the location.
A public hearing at which par-
lished in said newspaper in the issues of IMS
ties in Interest and citizens shall
have an opportunity to be heard,
will be held by the Board of
County Commissioners of Indian
Affiant further says that the said Press,brsnel is a newspaper puddled at Vero Beach, in
River County, Florida, in the
said Indian River County, Florida, and that the said has heretofore been
mouxs published
�Floride
County Commission Chambers of
class matte atttthe post t of��e 8 In�saidd Indiana River Coamry,
the County Administration Building,
for a perlod of ane year next preying the first publication of the attached copy of
le^ated at 1840 25th Street, Vero
adver�ernnerth and affiant further says that he has neither Paid nor panised any person, firm
Beach, Florida on Tuesday, June 91
or refund for the purpose of securing this
1998 at 9:05 a.m.
Pub lo
Please direct planning -related
y� r'G
, jwomto�a V subscribed before met day of 19�.�
questions to the current develop-
ment planning section at 567-
P, to���Y A y �r • , 1
., r
8000, ext. 242.
....L1J1
Anyone who may wish to
(President)
# MtCOMM15510NEXMIS j=
appeal any decision which may be
;a
made at this meeting will need to
s o1AHUARYpI
L COMM' No-tl611092 f KIMBERLY NE BLAIS
s =9 (SEAL Notary - Notary Public, State of Florida
ensure that a verbatim record of
the proceedings is made, which
x
�4 ; G`r, r My Commiasion Exp. JJ . 01.2001
includes testimony and evidence i
%__, ) 09
STA�Q� •°
upon which the appeal is based.
Personal) Knowncc
Y utor Produced ID ❑
......Type
ANYONE WHO NEEDS A SPE -
of ID Produced
CIAL ACCOMMODATION FOR
THIS MEETING MUST CONTACT
THE COUNTY'S AMERICANS
WITH DISABILITIES ACT (ADA)
COORDINATOR AT 567-8000
X223 AT LEAST 48 HOURS IN
ADVANCE OF THE MEETING.
'INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS
BY -s -John W. Tippin,
Chairman
June 9, 1998
,
May 27,1998 1352027r
Planning Director Stan Boling reviewed a Memorandum of June 1, 1998 with the aid
of the location map (below) and PD plan (see pages 116-117 in the backup) displayed on
the ELMO :
TO: James E. Chandler
County Administrator
D N HEAD CONCURRENCE:
Ro ert M. Keating, AICP I j
Community Development D ecto
THROUGH: Stan Boling, AICP
Planning Director
FROM: John W. McCoy, AICP
Senior Planner, Current Development
DATE: June 1, 1998
SUBJECT: MAGI International Management Co.'s Request to Rezone Approximately 4.76
Acres from CG to PD (Commercial) and Request Preliminary PD Plan/plat Approval
for a Mini Storage Facility
It is requested that the data herein presented be given formal consideration by the Board of County
Commissioners at its regular meeting of June 9, 1998.
DESCRIPTION & CONDITIONS:
This is a request by MAGI International Management Co., through its agent Kimley-Horn &
Associates, Inc., to rezone approximately 4.76 acres from CG to Planned Development
(commercial). As part of the rezoning request, a conceptual and preliminary PD plan/plat has been
submitted for approval. The subject site is on the south side of SR 60 immediately east of the Ethan
Allen furniture store. The purpose of this request is, to secure a zoning district that will allow a mini
storage facility greater than 3 acres in size.
The Board of County Commissioners is now to approve, approve with conditions, or deny the PD
rezoning request and the conceptual PD plan. Also, the applicant submitted a preliminary PD
plan/plat that was considered and conditionally approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission,
subject to Board approval of the rezoning. The preliminary PD plan/plat approval will become
effective if the Board approves the rezoning request.
*Planning and Zoning Commission Action
At its regular meeting of May 14, 1998, the Planning and Zoning Commission voted unanimously
(7-0) to recommend approval of the rezoning and the conceptual plan with the conditions contained
in the recommendation at the end of this report, and conditionally approved the preliminary PD
plan/plat.
June 9. 1998
M
BOOK 106' FADE 47
Boa 106 PnE 48
•Development Approval Options Available to the Developer
Presently, the site is zoned General Commercial (CG), a zoning district which allows mini storage
facilities as an administrative permit use and limits such facilities to a maximum size of 3 acres.
Any rezoning action must comply with the site's C/I, CommerciaUIndustrial land use designation.
There are two options available to the developer to seek approval of the proposed project. Either of
the two options, if approved, would allow the applicant to proceed with his project, as proposed.
These options are as follows:
1. Rezone the site to the CH, IL, or IG zoning district, all of which allow mini storage facilities
as permitted uses, with no restrictions on the facility acreage; OR
2. Rezone the site to a PD zoning district that is tied to a conceptual PD plan proposing a 4.76
acre mini storage facility.
On staff s recommendation, the developer has opted for a PD rezoning. If approved, the PD
rezoning would effectively rezone the property in accordance with the approved conceptual PD plan.
•The PD Zoning District, Generally
Although many PD projects have been reviewed in the county, few of those projects have involved
PD rezonings. Unlike standard zoning districts, there are no specific size or dimension criteria for
PD districts. Instead, the PD district is based on the underlying land use plan designation for density
and use limitations, and on compatibility requirements. In the PD zoning district, setbacks and other
typical zoning district regulations are established on a site by site basis through approval of a
conceptual PD plan. Adopted as part of the PD zoning for a property, the conceptual plan serves as
the zoning standard for the site.
A rezoning to the PD district requires the submission of a binding conceptual PD plan which, along
with certain PD district requirements, limits uses and sets -forth specific development standards on
the site. Thus, a PD rezoning allows a unique PD district to be developed specifically for each
development site.
In this case, the conceptual and preliminary PD plan proposes an 87,287 square foot mini storage
facility on 4.76 acres. Aspects of the proposed conceptual/preliminary PD plan will be addressed
in the "Plan Analysis" section of this report.
•The PD Rezoning Process
The PD rezoning review, approval, and development process is as follows:
STEP 1. Rezoning and Conceptual PD Plan Approval: Review and recommendation made by
staff and by the Planning and Zoning Commission. Final action taken by the Board
of County Commissioners.
STEP 2. Preliminary PD Plan/Plat (combination of site plan and preliminary plat) Approval:
Review and recommendation made by staff. Final action taken by the Planning and
Zoning Commission, subject to the Board's action on the rezoning request.
STEP 3. Land Development Permit or Permit Waiver: Reviewed and issued by staff for
construction of subdivision improvements (road, utilities, drainage).
STEP 4. Building Permit(s): Reviewed and issued by staff for construction of buildings.
June 9, 1998
.M
•
•
STEP 5. Final PD Plat Approval: Review and recommendation made by staff. Final action
taken by the Board of County Commissioners.
STEP 6. Certificate of Occupancy: Reviewed and issued by staff for use and occupancy of
buildings.
The applicant is pursuing approval of Steps 1 and 2 at this time.
Once a PD conceptual plan is approved, only minor modifications to the conceptual plan can be
_approved at a staff level. Any proposed changes that would intensify the site use (e.g. increase the
maximum building area) or reduce compatibility elements (e.g. reduced buffering) may be approved
only via a process involving public hearings held by both the Planning and Zoning Commission and
the Board of County Commissioners.
*Proposed PD District for the Project Site
The subject site has a C/I (Commercialdndustrial) land use designation. The underlying land use
designation allows a variety of commercial and industrial districts. Since the land use controls the
use of the property by limiting the applicable zoning districts, any rezoning must be compatible with
the uses allowed by the property's land use designation. Once a specific PD rezoning is approved
for a site, the applicable PD conceptual plan adopted as part of the rezoning limits the type of
specific uses and intensity of development on the site and establishes the site's dimensional criteria.
Although PD zoning district parameters are flexible, certain standards related to uses, compatibility
(buffering), infrastructure improvements, dimensional criteria, and open space are set forth in
Chapter 915 (P.D. Process and Standards for Development Ordinance) of the county's land
development regulations (LDRs). Based upon the proposed conceptual PD plan and the Chapter 915
standards, the proposed PD district for the subject site contains the special elements identified in the
table below. That table also lists corresponding CG district criteria for comparison purposes.
Element
Proposed PD District
CG Zoning District
Uses Allowed
Same as CG, except mini
Variety of commercial, retail,
storage facilities (even those
eating & drinking, and office
over 3 acres) are permitted
uses; some institutional uses.
uses.
Mini storage facilities up to 3
acres in size.
Maximum Building Coverage
42.1%
40%
Minimum Green Area
30%
25%
Perimeter Setbacks
North: 90'
North: 75'
South: 200'
South: 20'
East: I F
East: 10'
West: I P
West: 10'
Note: As a trade-off for increasing the maximum building coverage from 40% to 42.1%, the
proposed district would increase the minimum open space requirement from 25% to 30% and would
significantly increase the site's required rear yard setback. The site's rear yard abuts a mobile home
park.
June 9, 1998
41
BOOK IQb PAGE ��
BOOS 106 Dbu 50
REZONING ANALYSIS•
*Existing Zoning and Land Use Pattern
The site is presently an existing vacant tract of land with native vegetation consisting mostly of pines
and palmettos. To the north is SR 60 and commercially zoned property which was recently
developed as the Citrus Ridge Post Office facility. The property immediately to the east of the post
office was recently rezoned from CL to PD to accommodate a commercial development project
which will include fuel sales, a fast food restaurant, office uses, and a mini storage facility.
South of the site is a mobile home park which is zoned RMH-8 and has an M-1 land use designation.
This is the property that would be most affected by development of the site, since it is the only
adjacent residentially developed property. The rezoning should actually improve compatibility with
the mobile home park over the potential uses allowed in the CG zoning district. Not only is the
proposed use is a low traffic volume, low noise generator, but the conceptual plan provides for a 200'
setback to the nearest parking lot area. This is substantially different from standard CG
development, because most CG uses could be located within 20' of the south property line.
East of the subject site, there is a large area of commercially zoned property with a single family
home located close to SR 60.
West of the subject site is a commercial building which was recently converted to an Ethan Allen
store. The store and associated improvements occupy about the northern 1/s of the site, with the
remainder of the commercial parcel still undeveloped.
*Future Land Use Map Pattern
The subject property has a Commercial/Industrial land use designation, as do the properties to the
north, east, and west. The property to the south is designated M-1, Medium Density (up to 8
units/acre), a.designation that is appropriate adjacent to C/I designated lands. The proposed PD
rezoning of the subject property is consistent with the county's Future Land Use Map.
Consistency with the Comprehensive Plan
Rezoning requests are reviewed for consistency with the policies of the comprehensive plan and
must also be consistent with the overall designation of land uses as depicted on the Future Land Use
Map. These include agricultural, residential, recreational, conservation, and commercial and
industrial land uses and their densities. Commercial and industrial land uses are located in nodes
throughout the unincorporated areas of Indian River County.
The goals, objectives and policies are the most important parts of the comprehensive plan. Policies
are statements in the plan which identify the actions which the county will take in order to direct the
community's development. As courses of action committed to by the county, policies provide the
basis for all county land development related decisions. While all comprehensive plan policies are
important, some have more applicability than others in reviewing rezoning requests. Of particular
applicability for this request are the following policies and objectives.
Future Land Use Policy 1.21 states that node configuration shall provide for the most efficient use
of land and of transportation and other public facilities and services, while eliminating sprawl and
strip development. The rezoning will facilitate development of property internal to an existing
commercial node thereby implementing policy 1.21.
June 9, 1998
42
Future Land Use Policy 4.1 states that land use districts shall be located in a manner which
concentrates urban uses, thereby discouraging sprawl. The rezoning is in an existing commercial
node along SR 60 where the land use plan proposes to concentrate urban uses, such as the one
proposed.
Future Land Use Policy 5.4 encourages the use of the Planned Development (PD) overlay district
to provide design flexibility. The PD overlay zoning district provides the ability to develop the entire
long, narrow parcel as a mini storage use without some of the potential undesirable uses along SR
60 that a rezoning to CH, IL, or IG would allow.
Compatibility with Surrounding Area
Staff s position is that granting the request to rezone the property to PD will result in development
which will be compatible with surrounding areas. Since the land to the east and west is zoned
General Commercial (CG), and since the buildings closest to SR 60 are designed to look like general
office uses, the request is generally consistent with the existing zoning pattern. As indicated on the
conceptual plan, the most intense use of the site will occur near SR 60 with the office, residence, and
majority of the parking; the storage buildings will be located close to the side lot lines with the
building wall and accompanying required foundation plantings forming a buffer for the adjacent
commercial property. The development will set back all hard improvements a minimum of 200'
from the south property line, which is the property line nearest to a residential area.
Concurrency Impacts
No concurrency related services or facilities will be affected, since the rezoning is essentially a
"lateral" rezoning.
-Environmental Impacts
These issues will be addressed in the plan analysis.
PD PLAN ANALYSIS:
The conceptual/preliminary PD plan indicates a small office, manager's residence, three mini storage
buildings, and supporting infrastructure.
1. Size of Site: 4.76 acres
2. Zoning Classifications: Current: CG, General Commercial
Proposed: PD, Planned Development
3. Land Use Designation: C/I, Commercial/Industrial
4. Building Area:
Office: 1,050 sq. ft.
Residence: 1,050 sq. ft.
Storage: 85.187 sa. ft.
Total: 87,287 sq. ft.
Note: Three storage buildings are proposed, and will include externally accessed units with
roll -up doors as well as some units accessed from within an enclosed building.
5. Building Coverage: Allowed in CG: 40.0%
Proposed in PD: 42.1%
June 9, 1998
43
BOOK 106 FAGE 51
BOOK 10 6 PAGE
Note: Through the PD process, the applicant is requesting a waiver to the 40% building
coverage criterion in exchange for providing more than the required 25% open space and
increased setbacks.
6. Impervious Area: Proposed: 140,804 sq. ft.
7. Open Space: Required in CG: 25%
Proposed in PD: 30%
Note: The minimum open space required through the PD rezoning process will be 30%.
8. Parking: Required: 9 spaces
Provided: 9 spaces
Note: Parking is provided based upon new county parking standards for mini storage uses.
9. Setbacks: Front: Required by PD: 90'
Provided: 100'
Rear: Required by PD: 200'
Provided: 210'
Sides: Required by PD: 11'
Provided: 11'
Note: These setback requirements are proposed to be established for the subject site through
the proposed PD district rezoning.
10. Traffic Circulation: The project will have a single right-inhight-out driveway to SR 60.
The driveway will provide access to parking areas and mini storage units for loading and
unloading. The driving aisle along the front of the office and residence will be stubbed out
to the east and west property lines to provide for future interconnections with adjacent
commercial uses. The internal circulation plan, which includes a 28' two-way driving aisle
to serve most of the storage units, has been reviewed and approved by the traffic engineering
division. Based on the low trip rate, no off site traffic improvements are required, and none
are proposed.
11. Stormwater Management: The project's stormwater management plan has been approved
by the public works department, and the developer will be required to obtain a Type "A"
permit prior to site plan release. There is a single stormwater pond proposed at the south end
of the site which provides additional setbacks and buffering for the residential uses to the
south. Since the pond is over 2' deep, the stormwater management ordinance requires the
pond to be fenced or otherwise secured by a barrier. The applicant has proposed use of a
vinyl clad chain link fence, in accordance with the SR 60 corridor plan.
12. Utilities: The project will be connected to county water and sewer. This meets both
concurrency requirements and utility connection matrix requirements. These utility
provisions have been approved by the county's Department of Utility Services and the State
Health Department.
13. Landscape Plan and Buffers: The landscape plan generally complies with Chapter 926 and
the SR 60 corridor plan. This plan depicts a Type "B" buffer with a 6' opaque feature along
the south property line adjacent to the mobile home park. The applicant proposes to use
vegetation rather than a masonry wall to satisfy the 6' opaque feature requirement. In order
to achieve this buffer, the applicant is proposing to use over 5 times the understory trees
June 9, 1998
required (5 required, 29 provided) and 2'/s times the required number of shrubs (40 required,
106 provided). The Planning and Zoning Commission has. approved use of landscaping, in
lieu of a masonry wall, to provide the required 6' opaque feature on this site.
14. Environmental Issues: The 4.76 acre site is not subject to the native upland set-aside
requirement since it is under 5 acres.
There is a small isolated wetland on the site that will be filled as part of construction. The
applicant will need to obtain a county wetland resource permit as well as all jurisdictional
agency permits necessary to fill the wetland. These permits will need to be obtained prior
to site plan release.
15. Dedications and Improvements: Public Works research has revealed the possible presence
of a Murphy Act Easement for road right-of-way on the site. The applicant has researched
the Murphy Act Easement and provided staff with documentation that shows the limits of
the Murphy Act Easement are within the existing SR 60 right-of-way and do not affect the
project.
16. SR 60 Corridor Plan Criteria: Since the site is located within the SR 60 corridor plan area,
the corridor plan criteria apply. The plan meets the SR 60 corridor plan criteria as described
below:
a. SR 60 Roadway Landscaping: The project site fronts SR 60 only; there are no other
roadways bordering the site. With 165' of frontage on SR 60 and a 30' wide access
drive width along SR 60, the overall SR 60 plantable frontage is 1351. The applicant
is proposing a 42' deep planting strip along SR 60. All other elements of the
landscape plan meet the SR 60 corridor plan criteria.
b. Architectural: The two main buildings that will be visible from SR 60 will be the
office and the manager's residence. The office will have a metal standing seam gable
roof with a 7:12 pitch, while the manager's residence will have a metal standing seam
hip roof with a 7:12 pitch. The mini storage building will have a low slope roof
concealed by a parapet with cornice molding features.
C. Foundation Plantings: All proposed buildings have foundation plantings.
Foundation plantings for the mini storage buildings will be placed on the project
perimeter (behind the buildings), while the office and manager's residence will have
foundation plantings in front of the buildings. The foundation plantings meet the SR
60 corridor plan criteria.
17. Preliminary PD Plat: The applicant has submitted a preliminary PD plat, which essentially
constitutes a boundary plat. The proposed PD plat meets all applicable regulations.
18. Signs: The freestanding sign for this project will be a landscaped monument style sign. A
complete sign package is required to be submitted with the building permit submittal. Staff
will review the sign package for compliance with the SR 60 corridor plan.
19. Lighting Plan: The lighting plan submitted by the applicant generally consists of black pole
lights with shoe box fixtures. The lighting plan is consistent with the SR 60 corridor plan.
20. Concurrency: The applicant has satisfied the concurrency requirements for preliminary PD
plan approval.
June 9, 1998
45
BOOK 106 PAGE 53
BOOK iOG PAGE 54
21. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning:
North: Post office, vacant/CL and PD
South: Mobile home park/RMH-8
East: Vacant, single family/CG
West: Ethan Allen, vacant/CG
RECOMMENDATION:
Based on the above analysis, staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners approve
the rezoning to PD commercial and the conceptual PD plan, with the following conditions:
1. Prior to site plan release, the applicant shall obtain all jurisdictional permits for filling the
isolated wetlands on site.
2. Prior to the issuance of a C.O., all material proposed for the Type "B" buffer shall be
installed in accordance with the approved landscape plan.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Application
2. Location Map
3. PD Plan
4. Landscape Plan
5. Architecturals
6. Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes
7. Ordinance
June 9, 1998
46
` — SEBASTIAN RIVER DRAINAGE— —DIST _ 35 36
` -- - — WATERWAY — R/W
F.cr
—i — —
a W
N M E Q E M N S ~ T s Y
DI AR SIN m a
m `
24TN STREET -•
W W W NIT I a a a RM -6
~ s s = 90-16
= 0 = L = F% a C " F a L v 0 o R °~' U m X
x x =Ho
s x = 0 0
A-1
m m
STATE 1 ROAC 60
!TR:it--— — — — — ——
------------- IIt.v
K.
Subject Site
CG
I
R.14 VILLAGE GREEN
MOBILE NOME PARK ``'
PHASE 1 . ' ``,
rN
I
j !
j
June 9, 1998
S.R. 60
i
1M H-8
1
I
I
PHASE 2 ' I
I
RMH-8
1
' , I
I
�I
� II
-- --2'1
j II I� 12
A1TAODOfr 2
47
LOOK 10 PAGE 55
I
W
I F FA 40 IEWL
a
a
a
a
s
s
89-27
P
K
a
G
a
s
G
a
K
..
T
RM -8.
21ST
STRE
i
CL
I
a
a
H
jTPD
STATE 1 ROAC 60
!TR:it--— — — — — ——
------------- IIt.v
K.
Subject Site
CG
I
R.14 VILLAGE GREEN
MOBILE NOME PARK ``'
PHASE 1 . ' ``,
rN
I
j !
j
June 9, 1998
S.R. 60
i
1M H-8
1
I
I
PHASE 2 ' I
I
RMH-8
1
' , I
I
�I
� II
-- --2'1
j II I� 12
A1TAODOfr 2
47
LOOK 10 PAGE 55
I
BOOK 106 ME 56
Director Boling advised that the correct vote of the Planning and Zoning Commission
was 6-0 and not 7-0 as stated in the memorandum.
The Chairman opened the public hearing and asked if anyone wished to be heard in
this matter.
Melanie Clark, of Kimley Horn, the engineers on the project, thanked staff for their
help on the project.
It was determined that no one else wished to be heard and the Chairman closed the
public hearing.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED BY
Commissioner Adams, the Board unanimously adopted
Ordinance 98-14 amending the Zoning Ordinance and the
accompanying Zoning Map from CG to PD Commercial for
approximately 4.76 acres of land generally located on the south
side of SR60 in the 8400 block and the conceptual PD plan with
the following conditions: 1) Prior to site plan release, the
applicant shall obtain all jurisdictional permits for filling the
isolated wetlands on site; and 2) prior to the issuance of a C.O.,
all material proposed for the Type `B" buffer shall be installed
in accordance with the approved landscape plan.
ORDINANCE NO. 98-1A—
AN ORDINANCE OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AMENDING THE
ZONING ORDINANCE AND THE ACCOMPANYING ZONING MAP FROM CG
TO PD COMMERCIAL FOR APPROXIMATELY 4.76 ACRES OF LAND
GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF SR 60 IN THE 8400
BLOCK; AND DESCRIBED HEREIN, AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE
DATE.
WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission, sitting as the local planning agency on
such matters, has held a public hearing and subsequently made a recommendation regarding this
rezoning request; and
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida, did
publish and send its Notice of Intent to rezone the hereinafter described property; and
June 9, 1998
48
-I
•
•
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners has determined that this rezoning, is
consistent with the Comprehensive Plan of Indian River County, and the county land development
regulations, including but not limited to the Planned Development (PD) Process and Standards for
Development chapter, and
WHEREAS, The Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County, in conjunction
with the rezoning request has approved a PD conceptual plan (see EXHIBIT B, attached) that
controls and regulates development on the subject land; and
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners has held a public hearing pursuant to this
rezoning request, at which parties in interest and citizens were heard;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED, by the Board of County Commissioners of Indian
River County, Florida, that the Zoning of the property situated in Indian River County, and legally
described in EXHIBIT A (attached) be changed from CG to PD (Commercial).
All with the meaning and intent as set forth in the land development regulations, and the
approved conceptual plan as may be amended pursuant to the provisions of the Planned
Development (PD) Process and Standards for Development chapter of the land development
regulations.
Approved and adopted by the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County,
Florida, on this 9th day of lune , 1998.
This ordinance was advertised in the Vero Beach Press -Journal on the 27 day of
M a X ,1998 for a public hearing to be held on the 9 t h day of J u n e ,1998 at which time
it was moved for adoption by Commissioner F g g e r t , seconded by Commissioner
Adams , and adopted by the following vote:
June 9, 1998
Chairman John W. Tippin Aye
Vice Chairman Kenneth R. Macht AMP
CommissionerFran B. Adams Awe
Commissioner Carolyn K. Eggert Aye
Commissioner Caroline Ginn A v e
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
By: 4 A Lzt.
�
Jo W. Tippin, Chairin "�--
ATTEST BY:
Jeffrey,);�Barton, Cleyk� .
BOOK 106 PACE 58
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this lO // 98 by John W.
Tipp' as Chairman of the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida, and
by ►d Deputy Clerk for Jeffrey K. Barton, Clerk of the Board of County
Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida, who are personally known to me.
Notary Public
.'I!N!!N!!!!!!!!!liliiNilNJIAJ►I!!!►J!!!N!!► i //f e { ., �LL�LfL
.' ,av r Rata M. Smith i GC�1lG
°• 8 NokWhMio.StamofFW ida
s` CammissionNo.CC5W39 Prints Name: SEM SinlrN
My CommissionExp. 09N411000 Commission No.:
14IW3- rARY• Ft..Neimrsa.kea9aodfexca <
a»»»�»»�»�»�»�»»�»�r.»>�,r,»»••»» <. Commission Expiration:
Acknowledgement by the Department of State of the State of Florida dE93() day-
Effective upon filing with the Department of State.
This ordinance was filed with the Department of State on the following date:
6 - -qM
June 9, 1998
am c.
Dept.
Risk Mgr.
EXHIBIT A
THE WEST 165 FEET OF THE EAST 565 FEET OF TRACT 10 OF INDIAN
RIVER FARMS COMPANY SUBDIVISION, PLAT BOOK 2, PAGE 25, AS
RECORDED IN BOOK 34, PAGE 108, ALL OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA.
50
tlio
==-r
SrAawc.a
90
xq
Y
■ ` jj
t06
m
>
7=
W
s
~ I
a
�x 1
�06 a". to Y�
T
EXHIBIT B
June 9, 1998
51
BOOK 106 FACE 59
BOOK 106 PAGE 60
9.A.2. PUBLIC HEARING - CED CONSTRUCTION - PD SPECIAL
EXCEPTION USE & CONCURRENT PRELIMINARY PD PLAN
APPROVAL - CONSTRUCTION OF ELDERLY AFFORDABLE
MULTI -FAMILY DEVELOPMENT - THE CLUB AT VERO
CURRENTLY OWNED BY WILLIAM AND PENNY BARKERQ
PRESS -JOURNAL
Published Daily
Vero Beach, Indian River County, Florida
COUNTY OF INDIAN RNER: STATE OF FLORIDA
Before the urr�rsigrred authority personally appeared Darts K. Hicks who on
cot% says that he is President of the Press,loumal, a deny rwws aper, publtathed at veru Beach
In Irxtian River County, Florida that the attached copy of a dvertiserrlent, being
a U.CIALC k
In the matter of I IL
In the Court, was pub-
Osfled In said newspaper in the In of 1 k Ct C c
Affiant further says that the said Press -Journal is a rowsFlorkla, and that the said rpeaper published at Vero Beach, in
said Indian Rim ore bow
cxxdhwaJsly published in said I Rim County, Florida, eat d nand has been w has tiered as
second loss ma0 matter at the post office In Vero Beach, In said Indian River County, Florida,
far a per�d of one year mixt prerx�r8rlg the tint publication of the attached copy of
advicceoorrrtlppsooerrrraao3nt; arch afflant further says that he has neither paid ror promised any person, firm
dvertfsertrentt fa =tion rebate, commission in or refund for the purpose of securing this
°°^amsiSp„arld substxibed before me U+.�� ot-ffi� �D�./18-►:L_
aQ��Q;.• . d�� o¢ �
o ul i)
a * MY COMMISSION EXPIRES fei�y al
JANUARY 01, 2001 = =jam
= o J j611092 j
KIMBERLYANN LAIS
[O
s Notary Public, State of Florida
My Commisalan Exp. Jan. 01, 2007
�,,' • . - - • FF , Comm. No. CC 611
9,ry6 z/C, S-10. °"•� Personally Known rot Produced ID 13....aoow°pO TYPO of ID Pradmeed � --
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
Notice of hearing to" consider
the granting ofspecial exception
use and PD conceptual plan
approval for an elderly affordable
multi -family development with a
200/6 density bonus. The subject
property Is presently owned by
William 8 Penny Barker, and
located in Section 6, Township 33
and Range 39. See the above map
for the location.
A public hearing at which par-
ties in interest and citizens shall
have an opportunity to be heard,
will be held by the Board of
:County Commissioners of. Indian
River County, Florida, in the
County Commission Chambers of
the County Administration Building,
located at 1840 25th Street, Vero
Beach, Florida on Tuesday, June 9,
1998 at 9:05 a.m
Please direct planning -related
questions to the current develop-
ment planning section at 567-8000
ext. 242.
Anyone who may wish to
appeal any decision which may be
made at this meeting will need to
ensure that a verbatim record of
the proceedings Is made, which
includes testimony and evidence
upon which the appeal is based.
ANYONE WHO NEEDS A SPE-
CIAL ACCOMMODATION FOR
THIS MEETING MUST CONTACT
THE COUNTY'S AMERICANS
WITH DISABILITIES ACT (ADA)
COORDINATOR AT 567-8000
X223 AT LEAST 48 HOURS IN
ADVANCE OF THE MEETING. 807
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS
BY -s -John W. Thppin,
Chairman
May 27, 1998 1352065r
Planning Director Stan Boling reviewed a Memorandum of May 29, 1998 with the
aid of an aerial photograph and site plans (pages 138 & 139 of the backup) displayed on the
ELMO:
June 9, 1998
52
•
TO: James E. Chandler
County Administrator
DIPMPN HEAD CONCURRENCE:
�_ /ff- -111�/,�_V.,_Z_-,
'kdbert . Kea ' g, AICP
Community Development Director/
4.16.
THROUGH: Stan Boling, AICP
Planning Director
FROM: John W. McCoy, AICP
Senior Planner, Current Development
DATE: May 29, 1998
SUBJECT: CED Construction Inc.'s Request for Planned Development (PD) Special Exception
Use and Concurrent Preliminary PD Plan Approval to Construct an Elderly
Affordable Multi -Family Development to be Known as The Club at Vero
It is requested that the data herein presented be given formal consideration by the Board of County
Commissioners at its regular meeting of June 9, 1998.
DESCRIPTION & CONDITIONS:
Knight, McGuire & Associates, Inc. has submitted an application for PD special exception
use/conceptual PD plan and concurrent preliminary PD plan approval on behalf of CED Construction
Inc. to construct a one phase, 184 unit elderly, affordable, multi -family apartment complex to be
known as The Club at Vero. The project is proposed to be developed on a 19.24 acre parcel located
on the south side of SR 60 just east of the existing Lake in the Woods project. The subject property
is zoned RM -8.
The conceptual and preliminary PD plans depict the construction of a single 184 unit 3 story building
located in the northern portion of the project, along with a pool, and parking areas. On the southern
portion of the site, a pond and large open space/picnic and walking trail areas are proposed. The
developer has applied for a 20% affordable housing density bonus, which is available through the
PD (planned development) approval process subject to special buffering. This project's
qualifications for receiving the affordable housing density bonus are discussed in the analysis portion
of this report.
OPD Project Process
As a PD project, the process involved in review and approval of this proposal is as follows:
Approval Needed
Reviewing Body
1.
Conceptual Plan/Special Exception
PZC & BCC
2.
Preliminary PD Plan
PZC
3.
Land Development Permits or Waiver
Staff
4.
Final PD Plat
BCC
The applicant is now requesting approval of the first
two steps.
June 9, 1998
53
•
BOOK IOU PAGE 61
BOOK 106 PAGE 62
•Planning and Zoning Commission Consideration
At its regular meeting of May 14, 1998, the Planning and Zoning Commission voted unanimously
(7-0) to recommend approval of the special exception use and conceptual PD plan application. Also,
the Planning and Zoning Commission approved the preliminary PD plan subject to the Board of
County Commissioners action on the conceptual PD plan and special exception use application.
ANALYSIS•
1. Size of Development: 19.24 acres
2. Zoning Classifications: RM -8, Residential Multi -Family (up to 8 units/acre)
3. Land Use Designations: M-1, Medium Density Residential 1 (up to 8 units/acre)
4. Phasing: All improvements are to be constructed at the same time.
5. Number of Units: Proposed: 184 units
Allowed: 184 units
6. Off -Street Parking: Required: 368 spaces
Provided: 374 spaces
Note: As allowed by the code, the applicant is proposing 92 stabilized grassed parking
spaces with the remaining 276 spaces being paved.
Section 954.05(4 1)(a) I states that parking spaces for multi -family residents should be located
within 200' of the units they serve. While the applicant has not done a detailed analysis, he
generally acknowledges that there are parking spaces greater than 200' from the units they
serve. Generally, the more remotely located parking spaces are due to design constraints of
the narrow property, and the fact that all of the residential units are contained in a single
building. The narrowness of the property does not allow parking on the east side of the
building, thus precluding an option for spaces to be located along an entire side of the
building. The applicant has revised the plan at staff s request to eliminate a plaza area with
a fountain and replaced it with 14 additional spaces adjacent to the building. In staff s
opinion, the revisions help address the general policy of having spaces located close to the
units served. Also, staff has suggested providing at least 1 space within 200' of each unit
assigned for that unit, and signing an area close to the entry points for short term loading and
unloading such as groceries.
7. Density:
Normal RM -8 maximum: 8.00 units/acre
Allowed (with 20% density bonus): 9.60 units/acre
Proposed (with 20% density bonus): 9.56 units/acre
Note: The density is based on 19.24 gross acres of developable RM -8 zoned property.
By using the affordable housing density bonus available through the PD process, the
applicant is proposing a 20% density bonus increase above the project's normally allowed
maximum density. The applicant will also be dedicating additional right-of-way for 161'
Street and will be compensated through a density credit. The yet -to -be -dedicated right-of-
way is included in the site's gross upland area acreage (19.24 acres), as indicated below.
Both the affordable housing density bonus and the density credit as compensation for the
proposed right-of-way dedication are provided for in the LDRs.
June 9, 1998
54
0 0
L�
•
The total number of units allowed on the project site is as follows:
Overall Project: 19.24 gross acres
19.25 x 8 units/acre =153.9 units or 153 units allowed
153.9 x.2 = 30.78 units or 30 units of affordable housing density credit allowed
153.9 + 30.7 = 184.6 units or 184 units allowed
Pursuant to section 911.14(4) (zoning chapter) of the county's land development regulations
(see attachment #4), the applicant has requested an affordable housing density bonus of 20%,
or 30.7 units, with special buffering as required in the newly adopted comprehensive plan
affordable housing policies. Those policies are also scheduled to be codified into the LDRs
in May, 1998.
The applicant is providing affordable housing through a financing program administered by
the Florida Housing Finance Agency (FHFA). Under that program, the applicant is required
to keep all of the units affordable for a 15 year period. For rental projects such as this one,
"affordable" is defined in the county's LDRs as aproject having a monthly rental rate equal
to .083 times 20% of the non -adjusted annual median family income for Indian River County
as established by the FHFA. Satisfaction of the tax credit program requirements will satisfy
county affordable housing density bonus requirements.
Based on the proposed PD and proposed program participation, staff has determined that the
applicant meets county requirements for a 20% affordable housing density bonus. To ensure
that these requirements will be met, the applicant will need to provide the county with a letter
from the state or federal agency responsible for funding and monitoring the project under the
tax credit program. In addition, the LDRs require the applicant to record a restrictive
covenant that specifies the terms of the affordable housing approval, and places any
prospective buyer of the project on notice as to the terms of approval.
8. New Impervious Surface Area: 6.90 acres or 35.87% of the overall site
9. Open Space: Required: 30.00%
Provided: 52.39%
Note: The open space percentage does not reflect any credit for the 2.28 acres of lakes which
constitute 11.74% of the overall site.
10. Recreation Area: Required: 2.30 acres
Provided: 2.30 acres
Note: Recreation area is generally provided at the pool facility, walking trail, and picnic
pavilion.
11. Traffic: The applicant is proposing a driveway on SR 60 to provide access to the project.
That driveway will be limited to right-inhight-out movements on SR 60. Also, the project
will have a secondary driveway access to 161 Street, a Thoroughfare Plan road that is yet to
be paved. The driveway on 161 Street will be a full movement driveway.
Within the project site, the SR 60 driveway will provide access to the northern parking lot,
and north building entrance. From there the driveway proceeds south, along the west side
of the building, to the south parking lot and south building entrance. The driveway
June 9, 1998
55
A
,bov� 106 fa 64
continues through the southern portion of the site to connect with 16' Street. The internal
circulation system has been reviewed and approved by the county traffic engineering
division, subject to driveway improvements discussed later in this report under "Dedications
& Improvements".
The applicant has submitted a traffic impact analysis for the proposed development, and that
analysis has been reviewed and approved by the county's traffic engineering section. The
traffic impact analysis indicates that a right turn deceleration lane is required at the project's
entrance along SR 60. The applicant has depicted the deceleration lane on the site plan.
Detailed construction plans approved by the FDOT will need to be submitted prior to site
plan release, and the right turn lane will need to be constructed prior to issuance of a
certificate of occupancy.
12. Stormwater Management: The public works department has reviewed and approved the
conceptual stormwater management plan. Prior to issuance of a land development permit
or land development permit waiver, the applicant must obtain a Type "A" stormwater
management permit.
13. Coneurrency: The applicant has applied for initial concurrency and signed a concurrency
acknowledgment form, which satisfies the project's concurrency requirements for
preliminary PD plan approval. Thus, all concurrency requirements related to conceptual and
preliminary PD plan approval have been satisfied.
14. Environmental Issues:
•Uplands: Since the site pis over 5 acres, the native upland set-aside provisions could
potentially apply to this project. However, the environmental planning staff has inspected
the site and verified that the site is mainly existing grove and that no native upland plant
community exists. Therefore, no set-aside requirement applies to this project.
*Wetlands: The environmental planning staff has inspected the site and verified that no
wetlands exist; therefore, no wetland regulations apply to this development.
15. Dedications & Improvements: The county's Thoroughfare Plan classifies SR 60 as a major
urban arterial road which requires 200' of right-of-way. Presently, 172' of right-of-way exist
for SR 60. Due to the presence of a canal right-of-way between this property and the SR 60
right-of-way, no additional right-of-way for SR 60 is required from this site.
Presently, 30' of right-of-way exists for 161 Street. The county's Thoroughfare Plan
classifies 16* Street as a collector road requiring 80' of right-of-way. The applicant will be
dedicating an additional 50' of right-of-way for 161 Street to complete the 80' standard.
While the applicant is allowed to use the gross area of the site for density calculation
purposes, the county is giving compensation through density credit only for the right-of-way
dedicated above the 60' local road standard. This type of density credit arrangement has been
used for other projects within the county as allowed pursuant to LDR section 952.08(1)(e).
The county's sidewalk and bikeway plan calls for a 5' sidewalk along the project's 16' Street
frontage. However, since 161 Street is unpaved at this time, the sidewalk is not required of
the developer.
While the paving of 16* Street is not a required improvement for this project, the applicant
is working with the county to formulate a developers agreement that compensates the
developer for paving 161' Street from the project's entrance to 661 Avenue. The main issue
with the developer's agreement is the county's ability to acquire 161 Street right-of-way
June 9, 1998
56
between the project site and 661 Avenue. If the county can acquire the right-of-way, a
developer's agreement for the paving will be negotiated. However, neither the paving of 161
Street nor the negotiation of a developers agreement for such paving is related to PD
approval of the project.
In regard to the internal driveway (681 Drive) that runs through the project from SR 60 to
16' Street, the applicant is proposing to construct the southern half of the roadway as an
unpaved stabilized roadway. The public works director will not approve the stabilized
driveway construction. Planning staff and public works staff believe the southern portion
of the road needs to be paved to ensure an adequate secondary access for such a large project.
It is the opinion of public works and planning staff that such paved secondary access is
necessary for the project to provide adequate connections to the public street network as
required in LDR section 913.07(4)(H)l.b. and c. The applicant is already proposing the
necessary roadway segment, but not proposing to surface it to the county's paved driveway
standards found in LDR section 954.10. The driveway is private and will be used by
residents of the project only. If paved, the driveway will provide an alternative to SR 60,
especially once 161 Street is paved.
According to county records, there is a Murphy Act easement for right-of-way on the
property. At this point it has not yet been determined to what extent the Murphy Act
easement encroaches into the property. Since no additional right-of-way is required from the
site, the county has no objection to releasing the Murphy Act easement. Prior to PD plan
release, the applicant will need to determine the extent of the Murphy Act easement, apply
to the FDOT for release, and obtain release of the easement.
16. General Compatibility: When applicants are seeking a density bonus, compatibility with
adjacent properties is a concern. In this case, the concern is with the adjacent properties to
the east and west. The property to the east is vacant and has an M-1 land use designation.
The most intense zoning allowed in the M-1 land use designation is the RM -8 district, a
zoning district which allows multi -family development up to 8 units per acre, Tong with a
variety of institutional uses. The property to the west is Lake in the Woods, a multi -family
community developed under the RM -6 zoning regulations. The Lake in the Woods site plan
approved 196 multi -family units, 110 apartment units and 210 ACLF units for a total of 516
units on 68 acres or 7.58 units/acre. (Note: ACLF units are generally not considered "full"
units for density purposes.) The original Lake -in -the -Woods site plan was modified to
convert the 110 apartments to 37 single family homes, which lowered the actual density to
6.51 units/acre.
The developer of the proposed project has tried to concentrate the proposed improvements
in the northern half of the site and keep the improvements as far away as possible from the
majority of existing residential units located on the adjacent Lake -in -the Woods project site.
As indicated in the landscaping section of this report, a Type "B" buffer will be provided on
the east and west sides of the site. By clustering the improvements and using a single three
story building, the applicant is able to provide over 52% green area, a percentage which does
not include the 11.7% of the site developed as lake area. Building setbacks are as follows:
North: 380'
South: 1,500'+
East: 50'
West: 85'
June 9, 1998
57
BOOK oa 65
I - 106 "'t66
Through the project's tax credit and financing program, the development will be restricted
to elderly residents. Such a restriction could make the project more compatible with some
of the existing developments in the area that are largely occupied by seniors. Any change
in the project's age of residents restrictions would constitute a change of use and would
require approval by the county.
In staffs opinion, the proposed residential development would be compatible with other uses
and developments along SR 60, based upon building location, setbacks, and buffering.
17. Landscaping and Buffering: The landscape plan meets the requirements of Chapter 926,
including a 25' setback from all project property lines. The comprehensive plan requires that
projects seeking a density bonus provide a Type "B" buffer on any perimeters that are
adjacent to other residential properties. That criterion has been applied to this project.
Consequently, the applicant is proposing a Type "B" buffer along the east and west property
lines. Buffers consistent with the SR 60 corridor plan have been provided along the project's
SR 60 and 16th Street frontage. All buffers will need to be completed prior to the issuance
of a certificate of occupancy for the building.
Also, pursuant to increased tree standards adopted into the LDRs last December, larger
canopy trees are required and proposed on the east side of the building. Because the building
is over 25' high and is closer than 70' to the east property line, all canopy trees within that
Type "B" buffer are specified as 16'-18' tall, 3" caliper, and 8' spread at time of planting.
18. SR 60 Corridor Plan Criteria: Since the site is located within the SR 60 corridor plan area,
the corridor plan criteria apply. The plan meets the SR 60 corridor plan criteria as described
below:
a. Roadway Landscaping: The site has frontage on SR 60 and 161 Street, both of
which are thoroughfare plan roads. The project has 338' of frontage on SR 60 and
190' of frontage on 16th Street. A 48' wide driveway on SR 60 reduces the plantable
frontage to 290'. A 20' wide driveway on 161 Street reduces the plantable frontage
to 17W. The landscape plan provides the proper amount of landscape material to
meet the corridor plan buffer requirements along both the SR 60 and 16' Street
frontages. Those buffers provide the required 6' opaque feature for multi -family
project Thoroughfare Plan road frontages, and are a minimum of 40' deep along SR
60 and a minimum of 140' deep along 161 Street. All other elements of the
landscape plan meet the SR 60 corridor plan criteria.
b. Architectural: There will be one 3 story building with gable roofs that have a 5:12
pitch. The roof will be a fiberglass shingle roof that is allowed for residential
structures within the SR 60 corridor. All of the proposed colors and building
materials have been reviewed and meet the SR 60 corridor plan requirements.
C. Foundation Plantings: While no foundation plantings are required for residential
structures in the SR 60 corridor, the applicant will be providing a variety of
foundation plantings compatible with the building.
d. Signs: The freestanding sign for this project will be a landscaped monument style
sign. A complete sign package will be submitted with the building permit
application. Staff will review the sign package for compliance with the SR 60
corridor plan.
e. Lighting Plan: The applicant has submitted a lighting plan that is consistent with the
SR 60 corridor plan.
June 9, 1998
58
I
19. Preliminary Plat: The applicant has submitted a preliminary plat, which essentially
constitutes a boundary plat. The proposed PD plat meets all applicable regulations.
20. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning:
North: SR 60, Vista Plantation/RM-4
South: 161 Street, groves/A-1
East: Central Assembly of God Church/A-1
West: Lake in the Woods/RM-6
RECOMMENDATION:
Based on the analysis, staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners grant special
exception use and PD conceptual plan approval for the 184 unit Club at Vero elderly affordable
housing project with the following conditions:
1. Prior to or via the final PD plat, 50' of property along the site's southern border shall be
dedicated for 16th Street right-of-way. Dedication of the right-of-way to be compensated by
the density credit reflected in the approved PD plan.
2. In return for the housing density bonus granted, the project shall be allowed a maximum of
184 residential units at project build -out. In addition, the following affordable housing
conditions shall apply:
a. Prior to the issuance of a land development permit or land development permit
waiver for the project, the applicant shall submit to the county a letter from a state
or federal agency verifying that the project is committed to a state or federal housing
program which satisfies the county's affordable housing requirements for rental units
as found in LDR section 911.14(4), and that a state or federal agency will monitor
project compliance with affordable housing requirements.
b. That prior to issuance of a C.O. for any affordable housing rental units, the developer
shall comply with the covenant requirements of LDR section 911.14(4)(a)2.f.
3. Prior to PD plan release, the applicant shall provide to the county traffic engineering division
FDOT approved construction plans for the SR 60 project entrance right turn lane.
4. Prior to PD plan release, the PD plan shall be revised to show the "68th Drive" driveway
paved to county site plan standards through the southern portion of the project to 16th Street.
5. Prior to the issuance of a C.O., the right turn deceleration lane for the project's SR 60
entrance shall be constructed and inspected.
6. Prior to the issuance of a C.O., the internal driveway known as 68' Drive shall be paved
through the southern half of the project, providing a paved connection to 161h Street.
7. Any change from an elderly apartment complex shall constitute a change of use, and require
county approval.
A 'A IENTS: 4. Landscape Plan
1 • Application 5. Zoning Ordinance Section 911.14(4)
2. Location Map 6. LDR Section 913.07(4)(1)
3. Site Plan 7. Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes
June 9, 1998
59
BOOK O FnE 67
�y
�
BOOK 106 �,q 68
Director Boling advised that the rest of the attachments had been distributed which
had inadvertently been omitted from the backup. (Attachments have been filed with the
backup in the office of the Clerk to the Board.) The memorandum indicated a vote of 7-0
of the Planning and Zoning Commission, the correct vote was 6-0.
Commissioner Ginn hoped that the design of the building would not be like the one
on 6' Avenue (Gardenia Gardens) which she thought looked like a "prison", and Director
Boling assured her that the design of this project was much different and would have
abundant landscaping as well. A color drawing (design board) of the proposed building was
displayed by the applicant which allayed her fears.
Commissioner Ginn wondered why such a difference in design and why, as has been
reported in the newspaper, Gardenia Gardens still had empty units. She speculated that
maybe the county did not need any more low-income elderly housing.
Community Development Director Bob Keating explained the funding differences
between the project before them and Gardenia Gardens (a HUD project). He also pointed
out that Gardenia Gardens was aimed at a lower income elderly population, with
significantly lower rents. The design might be another explanation for the space still
available there.
Vice Chairman Macht asked how it happened after all the prior comments made about
Kyle's Run, and Director Boling explained that Gardenia Gardens was treated as a standard
multi -family project (apartment building) which did not come before the Board of County
Commissioners, just before the Planning and Zoning Commission. So, there were no special
plan development requirements applied to it. What had come before them was River Park
Place, which has completely different elevations and architecture.
Commissioner Ginn stressed that she thought the area was being over -built and
reiterated her past disagreement with density bonuses. She believed the County needs to pull
back.
Vice Chairman Macht asked if this project did not fill up, if there was an escape
clause that would allow them to open to other than elderly.
Director Keating assured the Board that both the County's requirements and their
financing (Florida Housing Finance Agency) commit them to keeping the type of clientele
identified for the period of time. The units must be kept affordable for 28 years. He
understood that it would be policed by the FHFA.
June 9, 1998
.c
I
0 - 0
Vice Chairman Macht asked if the County would have policing power, and County
Attorney Vitunac replied in the affirmative. He added that the County does not have the
power to require a market study before the developers can begin their projects.
Commissioner Eggert stated that the affordable housing which has been built has been
a mix. She thought the County's need is not gone; the Council on Aging still gets inquiries
about housing. Just because one does not fill up quickly is not a signal another one will fail.
She felt the county did not yet have this level of quality housing.
Commissioner Adams interjected that recently opened Grace's Landing in Sebastian
is fall. She thought there was no question there is a present need. She also believed that the
developers did their own market studies to ensure the success of this project.
The Chairman opened the public hearing and asked if anyone wished to be heard in
this matter.
Bruce Barkett, attorney for the applicant, had with him David Knight, the project
engineer, and Scott Culp, the director of development for CED Construction, who wanted
to address some of the Board's concerns.
Scott Culp advised that their market study indicated a 1.6 vacancy rate in apartments
in Indian River County, which is very, very low. Last year, the County had a 2.3 vacancy
rate. Also the FHFA looks at demographics and targets areas that need additional affordable
elderly housing and offers incentives that CED utilizes as a financing source in order to build
developments such as theirs. Even with the different standards in mind, between their
development and Gardenia Gardens, they viewed an 80 -unit building which opened in April
and has now only 7 apartments vacant (93% occupancy) encouraging. Seniors' communities
typically lease up at a rate of approximately 10 units per month, no matter how big the
demand. They expect their community will take at least 18 months to fill. He explained that
Gardenia Gardens' maximum income level requirement is actually The Club at Vero's
minimum income requirement. The financing program is also quite different. He described
the amenities that are being offered by The Club at Vero which are quite desirable and offer
a level of quality that has not been seen in the county to this point. He also explained the tax
code with respect to tax credits regarding tenants' incomes.
Commissioner Ginn expressed concern about people moving and emptying out the
older buildings, and Mr. Culp agreed that sometimes happens, but it also encourages
rehabilitation of the older buildings to keep up with the market.
June 9, 1998
61
BOOK M FACE 69
J
Boa DO PnE 70
Commissioner Ginn thought the building was very attractive, but she could not go
along with more housing and density bonuses.
Mr. Barkett addressed concerns on enforcement and advised there will be a covenant
for enforcement. He also explained the process of how Indian River County was targeted
in 1995 for affordable housing and how tax credits are administered. Indian River County
is no longer a targeted community, so once the group of applications which started then are
built out, there will be no more.
Glenn Legwen, 5900 5' Street SW, was concerned about multi -units for elderly being
so far from the county's hospital facilities which are across the railroad tracks. He asked if
a change of density was being requested, and Director Boling stated they were asking for a
density bonus for affordable housing adding that it would be going from 8 units/acre to 9.56
units/acre. Mr. Legwen thought the Board should deny the request because they are asking
for a zoning increase. He thought the Board should put their foot down and stay with the
zoning plan. He asked why the staff was making the presentation and not the developer. He
asked if the "water pit" on US# 1 in front of the Kmart Plaza was beautiful or an eyesore. He
believed these fenced -in water pits should not be right up against the road. He asked if it
made good sense to have a 3 -story building for elderly people. He was not in favor of the
20% development bonuses. He asked if any of the units were available for month-to-month
rental.
Property Appraiser David Nolte had arrived late and asked if the Board had
discussed the impact of the development on ad valorem taxes and reminded them that there
have been applications to the Value Adjustment Board because developers of these projects
believe they are entitled to a very low evaluation. He wanted to point out this potential future
problem and read from the following:
June 9, 1998
C'1►?
0 0
•
•
Bulletin PTA -98-004
From: John Everton
Date: June 3, 1998
To: Property Appraisers
Tax Collectors
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE
PROPERTY TAX BULLETIN
it ,•
LEGISLATION CONCERNING
LOW INCOME HOUSING TAX CREDIT DEVELOPMENTS
The 1997 Legislature enacted Chapter 97-167, Laws of Florida, effective July 1, 1997. The law, in
part, amends provisions on low-income housing tax credit (LIHTC) developments, section
420.5099(5) Florida Statutes. It describes the use of certain appraisal methods only when
considering income, in assessing a LIHTC development for ad valorem taxation under section
193.011, Florida Statutes. The law states, in part:
For purposes of implementing this program in Florida and in assessing the property
for ad valorem taxation under s. 193.011, neither the tax credits, nor financing
generated by tax credits shall be considered as income to the property, and the rental
income from rent restricted units in a low-income tax credit development shall be
recognized by the property appraiser.
See Chapter 97-167, section 19, Laws of Florida (1997).
By referring to section 193.011, the new law applies to property taxes. It also prohibits the inclusion
of income credits for a subsidized low income property in the income from the property when
considering the income approach. It further requires that when appraising such property under the
income approach, actual rents be recognized by the property appraiser. This Bulletin supersedes
Bulletin 4DAV-96-009 dated August 13, 1996.
This information is furnished by the Department of Revenue to advise interested parties of legislative
action taken during the 1997 session. If further assistance or clarification is needed, please contact
Kathy Henley at (850) 488-3335.
Mr. Nolte explained that it means the normal method of appraising cannot be used on
these properties and he believed the intent of the law is to give an ad valorem tax break to
this kind of development. He warned that if that happens, and there's a normal amount of
services required for the development, someone else is going to be picking up their fair share
of the burden.
It was determined that no one else wished to be heard and the Chairman closed the
public hearing.
June 9, 1998
63
BOOK M6 PAGE .72
Commissioner Eggert stated her intention to continue to support this because she
thought it was needed. She pointed out the project is at a different price level and has been
very carefully done. She added that staff presented this to the Board as they do everything
that comes to the Board as a public hearing.
MOTION WAS MADE by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED
by Commissioner Adams, to approve staff's recommendation
with all the conditions.
Commissioner Ginn pointed out that the Board still did not have an analysis of the
number ofunits available per income group which was supposed to be forthcoming this year.
Citing the Mall, she asked why the ponds had to be next to the road, with chain link fence,
and are credited as green space. She felt work needed to be done in that area.
Director Keating advised that if a storm water pond is a wet pond and it becomes a
water body, it is not completely credited for green space, only a percentage is. A fence is
usually required if the water is over 2' deep as a safety requirement. The location is
generally determined by engineering in coming up with a storm water plan. If it is
maintained properly, it can be considered an asset.
Director Boling reported that the County cannot take credit for the pond in front of
Kmart, because it is in the City of Vero Beach and was built a long time ago. He advised
that this project will have storm water ponds similar to those at Walmart (near
east/Applebees' entrance).
Chairman Tippin recalled the original purpose of the ponds was to keep pollution out
of the Indian River Lagoon.
The Chairman CALLED THE QUESTION and the motion
passed 4-l(Commissioner Ginn opposed.)
June 9, 1998
64
9.A.3. PUBLIC HEARING - ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION
401.14 TO CLARIFY THE AGRICULTURAL EXEMPTION TO THE
BUILDING CODE
PRESS -JOURNAL
Published Daily
Vero Beach, Indian River County, Florida
COUNTY OF INDIAN RIVER: STATE OF FLORIDA
Before the uuuder authority personally appeared Darty] K. H cks who an
oath says that he Is President of the Press,lournal, a daily newspaper published at Vero Beach
int Indian River County, Florida: that the attached copy of advertisement, being
a 1Al ldl
in the matter of k� 401.A -
in the n Court, was pub-
lished In said newspaper In the Issues of t C1Q�
Affiant further says that the said Press%lournal is a newspaper published at Vero Beach, in
said Indan River County, Florida. and that the said new has heretofore been
mftuousiy publ�hed in said Indian River County, Florida, and has been entered as
seed daas mall .natter at the post office In Vero Beach, in said Indian River County, Florida,
for a period of one year next prig the first publication of the attached copy of
fit; and aff a further says that he has neither paid nor promised any person, firm
:d=
atop
any discount, ut, rebate, corrimission or refund for the purpose of securing this
advartfarrrrrent for publication in said newspaper.
orswtlYflYAa�'ang! subscribed before rneI I AD.
'1/g (rd
�0c�. •Fal,° � o /1<. �.t�i
(President)
NY CONNISSION EXPIRES
EANiIARY 01.2031
z CONN. NO.CC611092 ¢r Y.l"ABERLY ANEBLAIS
y • (SFa-) Notary Public, State of Florida
�� ' • EtiG My Commission Ezp. Jap. 01.2 001
z, `elf+=. STA�OM�+a Comm. No. CC 61109
�44p,�p Personally Known Wor Produced I ❑
TVpe of IP Prndur:nd .
1998:
NOTICE
The Board of County Commission.
ers of Indian River County, Florida,
hereby provides notice of a public
hearing scheduled for 9:05 am. on
Tuesday, June 9, 1998, to be held
be the Indian River County Admin.
istration Building, 1840 25th
Street Vero Beach, Florida. This
public hearing will be for the pur-
pose of discussing. the following
proposed ordinance entitled:
IAN ORDINANCE -OF tHE BOARD
OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORl.
DA, AMENDING SECTION
401.14 TO CLARIFY THE AGRI.
CULTURAL EXEMPTION TO THE
BUILDING CODE.
Any interested parties may appear
at the meeting and be heard with
respect to the -proposed ordinance.
Copies of the proposed ordinance
are available for inspection by the
public during regular business
hours at the of Office of the Clerk
to the Board of County Commis-
sioners, 1840 25th Street, Vero
Beach, Florida.
Anyone who may wish to appeal
any decision which may be made
at this meeting will need to ensure
that a verbatim record of the pro•
c eedings is made, which .includes
testimony and evidence upon which
the appeal is based:
Anyone who needs a special
'accommodation for this meeting
may contod the County's Amerl.
cans with Disabilities Ad (ADA)
Coordinator at 567-8000, Ext. 223
at least 48 hours in advance of the
meeting.
May 29,1998 1354726r
807
Community Development Director Bob Keating reviewed a Memorandum of June 3,
TO: Board of County Commissioners
FROM: Terrence P. 0Brien, Assistant County Attorney
DATE: June 3, 1998
RE: Public Hearing - June 9, 1998
June 9, 1998
An Ordinance Amending Section 401.14, IRC Code to Clarify the
Agricultural Exemption to the Building Code
65
BOOK FACE 73
booK 106 PAGE 74
This item was requested by the Building Official and Code Enforcement Officers
to clarify the Code with respect to the agricultural exemption to the building
code.
A public hearing date of June 9, 1998 was set by the Board of County
Commissioners.
Commissioner Adams wondered why this item had not been considered by the
Agricultural Advisory Committee because there had been no business to discuss at their last
meeting and this would have been a perfect opportunity to get some input from them.
Director Keating understood and apologized that it had not come before the
committee.
Commissioner Adams asked if it would be a problem if they defer it 30 days to send
it to the AAC for some input, and Director Keating responded it would not.
MOTION WAS MADE by Commissioner Macht, SECONDED
BY Commissioner Ginn, to defer the matter until after the
Agricultural Advisory Committee has considered it and made
their recommendation.
In response to an inquiry, County Attorney Vitunac believed they would have to re -
advertise and start all over.
The Chairman opened the public hearing and asked if anyone wished to be heard in
this matter.
Glenn Legwen, 5900 5'b Street SW, agreed with Commissioner Adams' suggestion
and asked what about nurseries that have "AG exemptions". He thought there were some
who would like to put in some agricultural buildings that might apply.
It was determined that no one else wished to be heard and the Chairman closed the
public hearing.
Commissioner Adams wished to clarify that the exemption for bona fide agricultural
purposes fits everything that is presently occurring. The problem has arisen on small 5 -acre
June 9, 1998
parcels that the owners think are"AG" because they have a home on 5 acres in an agricultural
area, and there is a difference.
The Chairman CALLED THE QUESTION and the motion
passed unanimously.
9.A.4. PUBLIC HEARING - ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION
307.02 - PROHIBITION PARKING IN HANDICAP AISLES
PRESS -JOURNAL
Published Daily
Vero Beach, Indian River County, Florida
COUNTY OF INDIAN RIVER: STATE OF FLORIDA
Before the undersigned authority pensonally appeared Darryl K. Hicks who an
oath says that he Is President of the Press4oumal, a daily newspaper published at Vero Beach
In Indian Rim County, Florida; that the attached copy of advertisement, being
In the matter of L+ I hr- J ?_L_) . C21—
in
—in the Court, was pub -
listed In said newspaper In the issue of
Afflant further says that the said PresWoumal Is a newspaper published at Vero Beach. in
said Indian Rim County, Florida, and that the said newspaper has heretofore been
oonflmously published in said Indian Rim County, Florida, each daOy and has been entered as
second doss mail matter at the post office in Vero Beach, lo said Indian River County, Florida,
for a period of one year nerd prig the first publication of the attached copy of
advertl9anhent; end affiant further says that he has neither paid nor promised any person, firm
or corporation any discount, rebate, corrrnission or refund for the purpose of securing this
adve�t for publication In said newspaper.
*
MY COMMISSION FXPIRfS JANOARY 01, 2031
{p? COMM.NO.611092 "z
zq9`{SEAL) : V2�
1998:
before me thh1s__.D6 01 day of_J32!l2L-_ A.D. 19 %
ttoter; Public. Slate of Florida
Comm. NogCC 6 XjP09JJ n. 01, 2001
Personally Known Wor Produced ID 0
Type of 10 Produced
NOTICE
The Board of County Commission-
ers of Indian River County; Florida,
hereby provides notice of a public
hearing scheduled for 9:05 a.m. on
'Tuesday, June 9, 1998, to be held
at the Indian River County Adminis-
tration Building, 1840 25th Street,
Vero Beach, Florida. This public
hearing will be for the purpose of
discussing the following proposed
ordinance entitled: .
AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD
OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY,
FLORIDA, AMENDING SECTION
307.02, INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
CODE TO PROHIBIT PARKING IN
HANDICAP AISLES.
Any interested parties may appear
at the meeting and be heard with
respect to the proposed ordindnce.
Copies of the proposed ordinance
are available for inspection by the
public during regular business
hours at the of Office of the Clerk
to the Board of County Commis-
sioners, 1840 25th Street, Vero
Beach, Florida..
Anyone who may wish to appeal
any decision which may be made
at this meeting will need to ensure
4hat a verbatim record of the pro-
ceedings is made, which includes
testimony and evidence upon which
the appeal is based.
Anyone who needs a special
accommodation for this meeting
may contact the County's Ameri-
cans with Disabilities Act (ADA)
Coordinator at 567-8000, Ext. 223
at least 48 hours in advance of the
meeting.
May 29, 1998 1354715r
Assistant County Attorney Terrence P. O'Brien reviewed a Memorandum of June 3,
June 9, 1998
67
BOOK IOU RGE 75
I
BOOK 106 PAGE
TO: Board of County Commissioners
FROM: Terrence P. O'Brien, Assistant County AttorneyjY0
DATE: June 3, 1998
SUBJECT: Public Hearing -June 9, 1998
An Ordinance Amending Section 307.02 Prohibition Parking in
Handicap Aisles
The Florida Legislature has recently amended the statutes governing handicap parking.
Section 316.1955(5)(c), F.S., prohibits parking in an access aisle. Section316.1955(7),
F.S., prohibits parking a vehicle in a disabled parking space unless the vehicle displays a
disabled parking permit and the vehicle is actually transporting the person to whom
the permit was issued.
The proposed a ordinance incorporates these changes so as to allow local enforcement.
A public hearing date of June 9, 1998 was set by the Board of County Commissioners.
The Chairman opened the public hearing and asked if anyone wished to be heard in
this matter. There being none, he closed the public hearing.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED BY
Commissioner Adams, the Board unanimously adopted
Ordinance 98-15 amending Section 307.02 of the Indian River
County Code to prohibit parking in handicap aisles.
ORDINANCE 98-15
AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY,
FLORIDA, AMENDING SECTION 307.02, INDIAN
RIVER COUNTY CODE TO PROHIBIT PARKING IN
HANDICAP AISLES.
WHEREAS, the Indian River County Code under Section 307.02 regulates
parking for certain handicapped persons; and
- WHEREAS, the Florida legislature has amended the statute governing
handicapped parking, and
June 9, 1998
0 0
•
WHEREAS, to enforce these regulations on the local level code amendments
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF
COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, that:
SECTION 1. AMENDMENT.
Current Section 307.02 is hereby designated paragraph (a) of Section 307.02 and
a new paragraph (b) is added to Section 307.02 to read as follows:
(b) No person shall park any vehicle at any time in an access aisle to a
handicap designated parking area. Further, no person shall park a vehicle
in a disabled parking space unless the vehicle displays a disabled parking
permit and the vehicle is actually transporting the person to whom the
permit was issued.
SECTION 2. REPEAL.
Those portions of the Indian River County Code superseded or in conflict
with the provisions herein adopted, in particular Chapter 401, are hereby repealed.
SECTION 3. SEVERABILITY.
If any section, or any sentence, paragraph, phrase, or word of this ordinance
is for any reason held to be unconstitutional, inoperative, or void, such holding
shall not affect the remaining portions of this ordinance, and it shall be construed to
have been the legislative intent to pass the ordinance without such unconstitutional,
invalid or inoperative part.
SECTION 4. EFFECTIVE DATE.
A certified copy of this ordinance, as enacted, shall be filed by the Clerk
with the Office of the Secretary of State of the State of Florida within ten days after
enactment, and this ordinance shall take effect upon filing with the Secretary of
State.
Approved and adopted by the Board of County Commissioners of Indian
River County, Florida, on this 9th day of June , 1998.
This ordinance was advertised in the Vero Beach Press -Journal on the
2 9 t hiay of M ay , 1998, for a public hearing to be held on the 9 g h day of
June , 1998, at which time it was moved for adoption by Commissioner
Eggert , seconded by Commissioner Adams , and
adopted by the following vote:
June 9, 1998
RE
BOOK 101 FACE 77
J
I
ua 106 ga 7
Chairman John W. Tippin Aye
Vice Chairman Kenneth R. Macht Aye
Commissioner Carolyn K. Eggert Aye
Commissioner Fran B. Adams Aye
Commissioner Caroline Ginn Aye
The Chairman thereupon declared the ordinance duly passed and adopted this
9gh dayof June , 1998.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSION
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
By By ai��42� �'Oa'aA
Effective date: This ordinance became effective upon filing with the Department of
State which took place onR��day of 11998.
rpf;II
11;81 I J -f
Fvdigel
Det•t
RISK Mgr.
S iq 99
9.B. PUBLIC DISCUSSION ITEM - MARBRISA SEASIDE
HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION'S REQUEST FOR COUNTY TO
PLANT LANDSCAPING AT SEAGRAPE BEACH
Public Works Director James Davis reviewed a Memorandum of June 2, 1998:
TO: James E. Chandler,
County Administrator
FROM: James W. Davis, P.E.,
Public Works Director
SUBJECT: Request from Marbrisa Seaside Homeowners Afssociation for
County to Plant Landscaping at Seagrape Beach Access North of
Marbrisa
REF. MEMO: Barbara Mercer to Indian River county Commissioners dated
May 23, 1998
DATE: June 2, 1998
June 9, 1998
70
40 0
•
The Marbrisa Seaside Homeowners Association (MSHOA) is requesting
that the County Parks Division purchase and install approximately
sixty(60) oleanders or podocarpus along the 8' wide grass area
between Seagrape Beach Access Parking Lot and the recently
constructed fence along Marbrisa's north property line. The MSHOA
is of the opinion that the plants would reduce noise levels,
enhance privacy, and promote safety in the area.
The County Parks Superintendent Jim Romanek and Public Works
Director Jim Davis met Mrs. Mercer and representatives from MSHOA
last winter to consider the request. Staff expressed the following
concerns:
1) Since the distance between the- Marbrisa Property line and
parking lot is only 8 ft.t, a row of ornamental plants that
would grow as high as 6' would also canopy out to fill most of
the 8' green area. Many cars, trucks, etc. back into the
parking spaces to unload beach equipment, coolers, etc. within
the green area so as not to obstruct the travel aisles. The
beach access is only 70' wide and most of it (44') is consumed
by pavement. Hedging the 8' strip would reduce pedestrian
travel, unloading, and usability.
2) Added plants may not increase safety, but could provide an
obstacle behind which someone could be concealed.
3) The Marbrisa homeowners have already planted palms and
hibiscus, as well as erected a fence and screening to create
a noise barrier. Once mature, staff is of the opinion that
their objectives will be accomplished.
4) A row of oleander would attract insects and require spraying.
Podocarpus sometimes does not thrive in the saltwater
environment. People will probably continue undesirable
practice in the plants. Trash will be more difficult to
remove.
Whereas staff applauds the efforts of the MSHOA in beautifying
their property with the palms and hibiscus, we respectfully
recommend that the existing green area be left open for park users.
Referenced letter
June 9, 1998
71
MOK 19'U PAGE 79
J
BOOK O PACE 80
Commissioner Eggert mentioned other concerns relative to planting oleanders, namely
children walking in the parking lot and caterpillars on oleanders.
Barbara Mercer made the following presentation on behalf of the Marbrisa
Homeowners Association:
I'm Barbara Mercer - 570 N. Monterey Dr. - Vero Beach, F132963
I'm here on behalf of the Marbrisa Homeowners Association to request approval for one
row of shrubbery to be planted alongside the south fence at the Seagrape Beach Access.
We request these plants because of our need to improve the appearance, security and
privacy of the Marbrisa. property.
The appearance of the Marbrisa property was changed due to the removal of all the
Brazilian pepper trees that were intrusive and a constant maintenance problem directly
behind the four units facing the beach access. They multiplied and choked out all the nice
vegetation and grass beneath them. This unsightly mess was ugly and so thick you
couldn't get behind them to remove trash, and debris. In our consideration of plants, we
kept in mind the barrier island and felt we should keep it functional yet tropical to obtain a
beautiful appearance for the entire community to enjoy. We spent $6,000.00 to remove,
clear, plant 13 queen palms, 90 hibiscus and liriope, and replaced the sod. Our decision
was also influenced by my conversation with Mr. Romanek who felt that oleanders would
not be a problem on the parks side of the fence since we were wanting some height and
denseness in a tiered affect. We also added an irrigation pipe which extends water
throughout the fence area Mr. Romanek also stated that extra maintenance would not be
a problem since he already had a crew that took care of routine maintenance and it would
be a lot less maintenance than they had to content with before.
In addition to these positive changes this brings me to the second point concerning
security and privacy. Being so open, close, and vulnerable to the daily activities in the
beach access ,we added extra lighting so it would illuminate the entire area at night and a
temporary fence screen for a little privacy. We also got opinions from professional
landscapers - Jack Sellnow from Busy Bee Nursery and Ronda Lowe from Rock City
Nursery. They both felt there was sufficient room for one row of shrubbery that would
act as a deterrent to anyone trying to climb the fence, throw beer bottles, glass, dirty
diapers, and other trash over the area. They recommended oleanders as an excellent shrub
which needed trimming at the most 3 times a year and would give us the height for
privacy. They also recommended three types of viburnum - the oderatissum, suspensum,
and awabuki as excellent low maintenance bushes.
In conclusion, because of this need to improve the appearance, security and privacy of the
Marbrisa property, we respectfully request that the Board of Commissioners grant our
request to plant one row of shrubbery along the fence at the Seagrape Access directly
behind these four Marbrisa units. We are willing to help with the purchase of these plants
and feel this would be a beautiful addition and benefit to the entire community.
Mrs. Mercer also had photographic handouts showing the before and after of the
fence. (These handouts have been placed with the backup of the meeting in the office of the
Clerk to the Board.)
June 9, 1998
72
Commissioner Adams asked if they had considered using vines which would cover
the fencing quickly and not take the 3' planting space needed for oleander.
Vice Chairman Macht suggested that Confederate jasmine would -also provide a
fragrance.
Mrs. Mercer confirmed that the irrigation they had installed would cover outside the
fence and she continued to request oleander.
MOTION WAS MADE by Commissioner Ginn, SECONDED
BY Commissioner Eggert, to deny the request.
There was discussion on the motion expressing support for Confederate jasmine,
concerns about setting a precedent, and a suggestion that the homeowners plant on their side
of the fence.
Mrs. Mercer addressed the point by mentioning that there was a buffer at the Turtle
Trail access.
Frank Coffee, 88 Cache Cay, believed the homeowners should have planted what
they are asking the County to plant and that the County should not be responsible for the
residents' problem.
Following lengthy discussion about security, suitability of particular plants, trash,
habits of people using the beach's parking lot, and other concerns, there was concurrence
from most of the Commissioners that use of Confederate jasmine would be a good solution.
Commissioner Adams suggested the installation by the County would probably be
about 50 Confederate jasmine plants at a cost of about $250.
Commissioner Eggert WITHDREW HER SECOND.
Commissioner Ginn WITHDREW HER MOTION.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED by Vice
Chairman Macht, the Board approved (4-1, Commissioner Ginn
opposed) spending up to $250 to install Confederate jasmine
next to the fence.
June 9, 1998
73
6QOK PAGE C,�
r,
600 106 wt 82
11.D. GOLF CARTS - SOLE BRAND DESIGNATION - GO FOR
RFP DECISION - GREENS' OVERSEEDING INFORMATION
Sandridge Golf Club Director Robert Komarinetz reviewed a Memorandum of May
28, 1998:
Date: May 28, 1998
To: Honorable Board of County Commissioners
Thru: James E. Chandler
County Administrator
From: Robert Komarinetz,
Sandridge Golf CIL
Subj: Golf Carts - Sole Brana Designation - Purchase
BACKGROUND
Sandridge Golf Club has been in operation since 1987. During these twelve plus years of operation only
Club Car with gasoline engines golf carts have been used. The first fleet, at the beginning of operations,
were bid and purchased due to low bid. In 1992 when the second course was added to the Club, one
hundred and fifty-six carts were purchased as a result of a Request For Proposals (RFP) which is also
a bidding process. The bid was awarded based on best bid rather than low bid which is authorized by
Policy.
Golf carts are very crucial to revenues in they must be kept operational in order to maintain the high
number of rounds of golf being played. Staff has been specially trained and an inventory of replacement
parts has been purchased to keep the fleet operational at a maximum of time. This attitude has paid off
in that the carts have been kept operational, a maximum number rounds have been played (during
season), and the carts have lasted beyond their life expectancy. The industry standard life of a cart is
four to five years maximum and our fleet is nearing the end of its sixth year of service. Keeping the carts
an extra year has maximized our revenues with low maintenance costs. The cost last year was only
about $210 more per cart over the average annual maintenance expense during the life of the carts.
This year is the time to replace the present equipment. To keep the carts another year would not be cost
effective due to excessive maintenance expense and loss of trade-in value. Revenues would be affected
if we experienced excessive down time.
Staff has talked with Club Car and determined the fleet can be replaced at a net cost less than the 1992
fleet was purchased if we place our order within the next thirty days. This means we can buy the carts
factory direct same as a dealer.
Replacement of the carts, whether leased or lease purchased, will mean an increase of the 1998-99
budget over last year. This increase would be passed on via a rate increase to patrons at an average of
seventy-five cents per round.
June 9, 1998
FBI
C:
ANALYSIS
In analyzing past experience and benefits described above, staff feels it is in the County's best interest
to continue using Club Car golf cart equipment for the following reasons:
1. Maintenance personnel are already trained and know how to maintain the carts to get
maximum use and performance out of them with a minimum of down time.
2. There is already approximately $5,000 worth of miscellaneous parts on hand that can be
used to repair the fleet and keep maintenance costs at a minimum.
3. Club Car has already proved they are high quality equipment and have a life expectancy
beyond the average when properly maintained as is currently being done at Sandridge.
4. By being able to purchase factory direct the County can take advantage of pricing when
models change both now and in the future.
5. Sandridge has always had an excellent working relationship with Club Car and they have
always been willing to help in any way possible.
The Indian River County Purchasing Policies provide for a designation of Sole Brand for purchase of
equipment when it is "the only reasonable brand of equipment that is capable of fulfilling the needs of
the County". This designation will allow staff to negotiate prices and purchase this equipment without
going through the bidding process.
RECOMMENDATION
1. Declare Club Car equipment "Sole Brand" for Sandridge Golf Club.
2. Authorize staff to negotiate the lease purchase of one hundred fifty-six (156) golf carts with a not to
exceed price of $325,000 including trade-in of the old carts, amortized over a four (4) year period or a
48 month straight lease. Staff will determine the payment program based on which is best financially
for the County.
Monies for this transaction will come from the Golf Course Operating Budget.
The Board reviewed two letters of June 8, 1998:
June 8, 1998
Board of County Commissioners
Indian River Country Florida
County Administration Building
1840 25th Street
Vero Beach, FL 32960
Dear Commissioners,
JEZ-
•
6601 Lyons Road, Ste. HS
Pompano, FL 33073
954/425-7003
800/643-9922
Fax 954/425.4304
E -Z -GO Division of Textron Inc.
South Florida Branch
This letter is to appeal to item 11.D (Leisure Services - golf carts) on the public
hearings agenda to be reviewed June 9th, 1998.
June 9, 1998
75
EcOK FACE 83
bcox 100 PnE 84
I am requesting that Sole Brand Designation not be awarded to this category, but
instead put this out to sealed bid.
As the direct factory representative for E -Z -GO South Florida, I would like the
opportunity to illustrate how I can save the county money by choosing E -Z -GO golf
cars.
I have reviewed one of the more recent bids and without question can save the
county a lot of money. E -Z -GO is the largest manufacturer of golf cars in the world
and two out of every three golf cars purchased is an E -Z -GO. I feel it would be in
the best interest of the county to put these golf cars on a sealed bid.
Again I would like to please request that the lease/purchase for golf cars for
Sandridge Golf Club be put on a sealed bid so competitors may have a fair and equal
chance.
Sincerely,f
Jack Voller
Area.Sales Manager
■
E -Z -GO Division of Textron Inc.
South Florida Branch
June 8, 1998
6601 Lyons Road, Ste. H5
Pompano, FL 33073
954/425-7003
Board of County Commissioners
900/643-9922
Indian River County
Fax 954/425-4304
County Administration Building
1840 251h Street
Vero Beach, FL 32960
Commissioners,
Jack Voller, our Sales Representative for Indian River County, has explained to me
that it appears E -Z -GO will not be given the opportunity to bid on the new fleet of
gasoline golf cars for Sandridge Golf Course. The explanation that has been given
to Jack is that E -Z -GO cars will not work at your facility and our engine will not
hold up. Considering we are the largest manufacturer of golf cars in the world this
explanation appears to be nothing more than a justification for a preconceived
conclusion rather than an objective finding based on the facts.
"Sole Brand Designation" is very appropriate in situations where there is only one
vendor that can provide a specific product or service. That, however, is clearly not
the case here and the concept of "Sole Brand Designation" is being misapplied to
deprive the county of benefits of true competition among suppliers.
I am sure that the tax payers of Indian River County have entrusted to you the
responsibility of spending their money wisely. Getting bids from other competitive
vendors in order to ensure that the tax payers are receiving the most for their tax
dollar would be the best way of fulfilling that responsibility.
In the event that the Commissioners do not choose to receive competitive bids it
would be our intent nevertheless to supply a bid from E -Z -GO and let you compare
June 9, 1998
76
to see that the taxpayer's' dollars have been spent wisely. We also encourage you to
do a thorough investigation of the specifications and performance of the competitive
cars. I assure you it will allay all fears that our cars will not work at your facility.
Ladies and Gentlemen, it is not my intent to try and pressure anyone to do
business with our company. All we ask is that we be given a fair opportunity to
compete. I have asked Jack Voller, our representative, to hand deliver this letter to
you as I am unavailable to attend the meeting tomorrow.
Patrick Gigandet
Branch Manager
Commissioner Eggert commented that other departments are moving away from sole
sourcing and have been rather emphatic in that desire. She was familiar with E -Z -GO golf
carts. She asked why the department had not considered that sole sourcing might be a
negative this year.
Director Komarinetz explained that when the RFP was issued in 1992, they tried to
define it to allow the best piece of equipment to come back to the golf course. They had
found that was a good decision which has given them a product, over the last six years, that
has been dependable and the County has gotten a good value. He believed the product to be
economically sound for the operation.
Commissioner Eggert compared it to buying an automobile six years ago as compared
to buying a new one today of the same brand; they are not necessarily of the same quality.
She thought there was an advantage to putting out an RFP as opposed to sole sourcing.
Director Komarinetz agreed that an RFP does give advantages and gives more
information.
Budget Director Joseph A. Baird interjected that this could also be considered fleet
standardization. The Fire Department does it with their fire trucks and the Sheriff does it on
his cars. There is an inventory of parts and the people are trained to work on the particular
brand. Those have been the reasons behind sole sourcing.
IIti ag
Commissioner Eggert understood but still felt there was an advantage to issuing an
Vice Chairman Macht asked if gasoline golf carts are specified, and Director
Komarinetz replied in the affirmative and that E -Z -GO does have a gasoline golf cart.
Director Komarinetz added that about two months ago he bought a new Club Car and
a new E -Z -GO cart as demonstrators to allow the operation technicians and staff an
June 9, 1998
77
600KI FACE
boax 103 FACE 86
opportunity to drive and compare them. The golfers had not had an opportunity to drive
them, just staff.
In response to Commissioner Adams' questions, Director Komarinetz explained how
staff arrived at the figure of $325,000 as a not -to -exceed price.
In response to Commissioner Eggert's questions about financing, Director Baird
explained that his office checks with banks when doing a lease/purchase because there is an
interest expense affiliated. So, the bidders are asked to bid both purchase and lease/purchase
so the costs can be kept at minimum.
Commissioner Eggert thought the recommendation left questions open and felt an
RFP would give specific amounts for the specific transaction.
Commissioner Adams asked if there was time to go for an RFP, and Director
Komarinetz replied in the affirmative adding that the original plan was to go with RFP but
in talking with the Purchasing Manager, based on good experience with Club Car, the
recommendation was to move forward with the sole source purchase. Director Komarinetz
advised that he had no problem going with the RFP if that was what the Board wanted.
MOTION WAS MADE by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED
BY Chairman Tippin, to put out a request for proposals for the
golf carts.
Under discussion, Vice Chairman Macht asked if golf cart rental was a profitable
business, and Director Komarinetz responded that it is profitable and by itself will generate
around $800,000 per year.
Commissioner Ginn asked why gasoline carts were used instead of electric, and
Director Komarinetz advised that, when the second golf course was built, staff learned there
would be a capital expense of between $30,000 to $40,000 for rewiring the cart buildings.
They had a good track record with the gasoline carts so it was decided to continue with the
gasoline carts. It had proved to be the right decision because the carts had been used an
additional year.
Vice Chairman Macht recalled that 27 holes were generally what could be expected
from an electric cart before it required re -charging.
-The Chairman CALLED THE QUESTION and the motion
passed unanimously.
June 9, 1998
78
9 . 0
Commissioner Adams asked Director Komarinetz to address the problem on the golf
course with the overseeding.
Director Komarinetz first mentioned that the Dunes Golf Course renovation project
went well. The greens came out of the overseeding process fine. He predicted that within
the next week or so the Dunes greens would be very good.
Director Komarinetz next addressed the Lakes greens and gave a comprehensive
report on the problems that have been incurred. The greens were beautiful during the winter
months but not during spring. The experts feel that in the next couple of weeks staff will be
able to do the renovations and there should not be problems in the future. (Clerk's Nate:
Director Komarinetz's full memorandum on this is filed with the backup of the meeting.)
11.E. ANTI-DRUG ABUSE GRANT FUNDING FY 1998-99
(Clerk's Note: At the request of Chairman Tippin, and on motion by Commissioner
Adams, seconded by Commissioner Eggert, unanimous passage, this item was taken prior
to Item 9.A.2. so attending staff could leave the Chambers. For continuity purposes, this
item has been kept in its proper agenda order in these Minutes.)
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of May 29, 1998:
TO: Members of the Board
of County Commissioners
DATE: May 29, 1998
SUBJECT: FY 1998/99 ANTI-DRUG ABUSE GRANT FUNDING -
OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET AGENDA ITEM
FROM: Joseph A B
OMB Directo
BACKGROUND
For the previous eight fiscal years, Indian River County has been allocated grant funds from the
Florida Department of Community Affairs (FDCA) to fund local anti-drug abuse programs. The
Board funded the following programs the last two years:
June 9, 1998
79
LOCK 106 PAGE 8
Box DO PALE 38
The County Administrator's Office received a letter dated March 12, 1998 from FDCA stating that
Indian River County has been allocated $157,777 in federal grant funds for FY 1998/99, the same
amount as last year, to fund local anti-drug abuse programs. The letter also requested the Board to
serve as the coordinating unit of government in applying for the funds. The Board, during its
March 24, 1998 regular meeting, accepted the invitation to serve as the coordinating unit of
government and named Joseph A Baird, Office of Management and Budget, Director, as the contact
person.
CURRENT
The Substance Abuse Council Advisory Board recommended four (4) programs as listed below:
Implementing
state share
Matching
Proposed
Agency
Agency
1996/97
1997/98
1999199
1. Substance Abuse Council of IRC
Indian Riker County
$20,777.67
$21,036.00
$21,036.00
2. Multi -Agency Drug
Enforcement Unit (M.A.C.E.)
I IRC Sheriff
$81,993.00
$91,063.00
$91,000.00
3. Teens Acting Responsibly Global
Education Troupe (T.A.R.G.E.T.)
Indian River County
$57,915.00
554,230.00
$54,293.00
4. IRC Adolescent Substance Abuse
Department
$68,250.00
$22,750.00
$91,000.00
Counseling Program and
Aftercare Program
New Horizons
$47,093.00
$44,040.00
$44,040.00
TOTAL
$207,778.67
$210,369.00
$210,369.00
The County Administrator's Office received a letter dated March 12, 1998 from FDCA stating that
Indian River County has been allocated $157,777 in federal grant funds for FY 1998/99, the same
amount as last year, to fund local anti-drug abuse programs. The letter also requested the Board to
serve as the coordinating unit of government in applying for the funds. The Board, during its
March 24, 1998 regular meeting, accepted the invitation to serve as the coordinating unit of
government and named Joseph A Baird, Office of Management and Budget, Director, as the contact
person.
CURRENT
The Substance Abuse Council Advisory Board recommended four (4) programs as listed below:
'Indicates a continuation from the previous fisgl year.
The grand total of all four projects is $210,369.00. If a project cannot be implemented due to the
budget cuts, then the money allocated for the project will be redistributed to other projects already
listed.
The M.A.C.E. Unit, Substance Abuse Council and T.A.R.G.E.T. receive their match from Indian
River County Board of County Commission funds since they are agencies of the County. New
Horizons makes the entire match themselves.
Copies of the grant applications are on file in the County Commission office for the Board's review.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners approve the Substance Abuse Council's
recommendations and authorize the Board chairman to sign the grant applications and other necessary
related documents for submittal to the state by the deadline of June 15, 1998.
June 9, 1998
80
state share
Matching
Programs to be Funded
Implementing Agency
75%
25%
Total
IRC Adolescent Substance
Abuse Counseling Program
and Aftercare Program*
New Horizons
$33,030.00
$11,010.00
$44,040.00
Multi -Agency Drug
Enforcement Unit*
IRC Sheriff
(M.A.C.E.)
Department
$68,250.00
$22,750.00
$91,000.00
Teens Acting Responsibly
Global Education Troupe**
(T.A.R.G.E.T.)
Indian River County
$40,719.75
$13,573.25
$54,293.00
Substance Abuse
Council of
Indian River County*
Indian River County
$15,777.00
$5,259.00
$21,036.00
TOTAL
5157,776.75
$52,592.25
5210,369.00
'Indicates a continuation from the previous fisgl year.
The grand total of all four projects is $210,369.00. If a project cannot be implemented due to the
budget cuts, then the money allocated for the project will be redistributed to other projects already
listed.
The M.A.C.E. Unit, Substance Abuse Council and T.A.R.G.E.T. receive their match from Indian
River County Board of County Commission funds since they are agencies of the County. New
Horizons makes the entire match themselves.
Copies of the grant applications are on file in the County Commission office for the Board's review.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners approve the Substance Abuse Council's
recommendations and authorize the Board chairman to sign the grant applications and other necessary
related documents for submittal to the state by the deadline of June 15, 1998.
June 9, 1998
80
•
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED BY
Commissioner Macht, the Board unanimously approved the
Substance Abuse Council's recommendations and authorized
the Chairman to sign the grant applications and other necessary
related documents for submittal to the State by the deadline of
June 15, 1998, as recommended in the Memorandum.
COPIES OF GRANT APPLICATIONS ARE ON FILE
IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
11.F. GROUP LIFE INSURANCE RENEWAL - COUNTY
EMPLOYEES
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of June 2, 1998:
TO: James E. Chandler
County Administrator
THRU: Tom Bisaillonyid
Acting Personnel Director
FROM: Ann Rankin-As�_
Benefits/Payroll Specialist
SUBJECT: GROUP LIFE INSURANCE RENEWAL
DATE: June 2, 1998
Attached is a chart showing the county's Group Life Claims
Experience from the commencement of the plan, October 1994 through
March 1998. As illustrated, the county's claims experience have
been unfavorable with respect to dependent optional life insurance.
Lon Bryan, Account Representative, notified the county that based
on our claims experience the county could expect an increase in
rates for fiscal year 1998/99.
On behalf of the county, Mr. Bryan negotiated (3) options with
Trans -General Life Insurance for consideration by the Board of
County Commissioners (see attached spreadsheet).
Option (1) the increase is applied to the county's basic life
insurance; therefore, the county would absorb the rate increase.
Option (2) the risk would be transferred to spouse life insurance
with a significant rate,increase to the employee.
Option (3) limits spouse life to a flat $20,000 benefit for new
enrollees, with minimal rate increase to employee optional and
spouse optional life insurance.
June 9, 1998
81
BOOK JU PAGE 89
BOOK 106 Mi
Since this is an optional benefit program, option (1) was not
viable solution due to the financial impact on the county.
After reviewing the other options, staff concurred that reducing
the amount of coverage a spouse can obtain will limit the exposure
and have a positive effect on the experience going forward.
Staff recommends approval of Option (3) which is to limit spouse
optional life to a flat $20,000 benefit for future enrollees with
a minimal rate increase.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED BY
Commissioner Ginn, the Board unanimously approved Option
#3 which limits spouse optional life insurance to a flat $20,000
benefit for future enrollees with a minimal rate increase, as
recommended in the Memorandum.
DOCUMENTS WILL BE PLACED ON FILE
IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
WHEN EXECUTED AND RECEIVED
11.G. 16TH AVENUE RIGHT-OF-WAY ACQUISITION - 43RD
AVENUE IMPROVEMENTS - PARCEL 121 - ORTH
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of June 1, 1998:
TO: James Chandler
County Administrator
THROUGH: James W. Davis, P.E.
Public Works Directo
Terry B. Thompson, P. E.. xd
Capital Projects Manager
FROM: William M. Napier, SRPA, SRA
Right -of -Way Agent
SUBJECT: 161 Street Right -of -Way Acquisition
43' Avenue Improvements, Project No. 9601
Parcel No. 121, William E. Orth, Jr. and James N. Orth
DATE: June 1, 1998
DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS
Twenty feet (20') of additional right-of-way, plus a corner -clip is needed on 16' Street for
adding a turn lane and other improvements in conjunction with the 43' Avenue Project.
June 9, 1998
82
The property owners have executed a contract at a negotiated price of $1.10 per square
foot for the RS -3 zoned land. This price per square foot is comparable to other similar RS -
3 zoned parcels the County has purchased based upon appraisals or evaluations.
The contract price is $6,956.40 based on a total of 6,324 square feet as determined by the
legal description. There are no appraisal or attorney fees.
RECOMMENDATIONS AND FUNDING
Staff requests the Board of County Commissioners approve the $6,956.40 purchase and
authorize the Chairman to execute the contract.
Funding is from Account #315-214-541-066.12
ATTACHMENT
1) Contract
2) Legal Description
ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED BY
Commissioner Adams, the Board unanimously approved the
purchase of 16th Street right-of-way for the 43' Avenue
Improvements Project No. 9601, Parcel No. 121, from William
E. Orth, Jr. and James N. Orth, for $6,956.40 and authorized the
Chairman to execute the Contract, as recommended in the
Memorandum.
COPY OF CONTRACT ON FILE
IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO TBE BOARD
11.H. GARDENIA GARDENS - DEVELOPER'S AGREEMENT
FINALIZATION
(Clerk's Note: During discussion of item 9.A.2., there was mention made of the
Gardenia Gardens project.)
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of June 1, 1998:
June 9, 1998
83
BOOK iub, mE 91
I
r- I
wa 106 i , Zlt
DATE: JUNE 1, 1998
TO:
JAMES E. CHANDLER
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
0
FROM:
DONALD R. HUBBS, P.. -\
DIRECTOR OF UTILITY S
PREPARED AND
WILLIAMF. , P.E.
STAFFED BY:
CAPITAL PACTS CTS ENGINEER
SUBJECT:
GARDENIA GARDENS DEVELOPER'S AGREEMENT
FINALIZATION, INDIAN RIVER COUNTY PROJECT
NO. CDS/CCS 589
BACKGROUND
On October 7, 1997 the Indian River County Board of County Commissioners approved a
developer's agreement with Gardenia Gardens (See attached agenda item, minutes, and
location map). The project is complete and the developer has requested that the County
review the final construction costs and consider additional funding since construction costs
were higher than the Engineer's estimate. The developer is aware that they proceeded
with this construction at the increased project cost at their sole risk and without the
County's concurrence.
ANALYSIS
The original project estimate cost $48,317.00 with the County's participation being
$29,625.58. The actual bid prices were as follows:
1) Martin Paving $74,300.00
2) JoBear $84,176.00
3) Blazer $91,183.50
With the low bidder Martin Paving, the County's portion would increase to $46,147.50.
The developer's portion increases from.$18,691.43 to $28,152.50 (See November
correspondence from Masteller and Moler). For details of the original cost sharing
agreement, please refer to Exhibit "A" of the original developer's agreement and agenda
item Attached is a summary spreadsheet detailing the original and final proposed cost
breakdowns. While the cost is higher than originally approved, the bid prices were all very
close, giving an acceptable view of current market conditions. The main cost increase
came from the increase in price for the conversion of the 6�' Avenue lift station to a
manhole (item 8) and the up grade of the Rax Lift Station (item 7). These two items alone
accounted for $11,852.50 of the County's cost increase.
The Department of Utility Services will benefit from the work performed and will see a
savings on the lift station restoration that was originally estimated at $25,000.00, along
with an operational cost savings of $2,500.00fyear with the 6`" Avenue lift station now off-
line. Also enclosed is the certification from the Engineer dated April 13, 1998, and the
associated invoice from the developer of Gardenia Gardens Vero Beach Elderly Housing
Corp. in the amount of $46,147.50. Funding for this project will be from the lift station
Renewal and Replacement account.
June 9, 1998
84
0 0
92
•
•
Options:
1) Reimburse developer in the amount of $29,625.58, as per the October 7`',
1997 agreement.
2) Reimburse the developer the increased amount of $46,147.50.
RECOMMENDATION
While the contract does not specifically bind us to increasing the reimbursement amount
over what is in the original agreement, project costs are reflective of the current market.
The Department of Utility Services will benefit from the construction which will provide
an operational cost savings to the County. With this in mind, the Staff of the Department
of Utility Services recommends amending the original developer's agreement to reflect the
increase in reimbursement to $46,147.50, as requested.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED BY
Commissioner Ginn, the Board unanimously amended the
developer's agreement to reflect the increase in reimbursement
to $46,147.50 as requested, as recommended in the
Memorandum.
AGREEMENT WILL BE PLACED ON FILE
IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
WHEN EXECUTED AND RECEIVED
B.C. COMMISSIONER ADAMS - CARSONPLATT ESTATE AND
REVIEW OF STATE'S POLICY OF NOT ALLOWING COUNTIES TO
HOLD A TITLE INTEREST WHEN PARTICIPATING IN JOINT
ENVIRONMENTAL LAND ACQUISITIONS - COMMISSIONER
ADAMS TO ATTEND JULY LAMAC MEETING IN TALLAHASSEE
(Clerk's Note: This matter came up at the conclusion of the Solid Waste Disposal
District Meeting. For purposes of tracking and completeness, the item has been given the
designation of 13.C.)
Commissioner Adams advised that the following letter dated June 4, 1998, had just
been received.
June 9, 1998
85
Boor. J06 93
SARAH M. BLEAKLEY
WARREN S. BLOOM
rREDERICK L. BUSACK
HARRY F. CHILES
MAUREEN MCCARTHY DAUGHTON
VIRGINIA SAUNDERS DELEGAL
L THOMAS GIBLIN
ERIK P. KIMBALL
MARK G. LAWSON
AMY E. LETTELLEIR
HEATHER J MELOM
STEVEN E. MILLER
MARK T. MUSTIAN
ROBERT L NABORS
GEORGE H. NICKERSON. JR.
STEN T. SLIDER
JOSEPH B. STANTON
GREGORY T.STEWART
JOHN R. STOKES
NABORS. GIBLIN & (VICKERSON. P.A.
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
SUITE 800
315 SOUTH CALHOUN STREET
TALLAHASSEE. FLORIDA 32301
TELEPHONE 18801 224-4070
TELECOPY 18801 224.4073
.::tip r•.
.JUN 0 8 1.998
June 4, 1998
800K 106 Mt 94
ITHE POINTE. SUITE 1060/
230$ ROCKY POINT DRIVE
TAMPA. FLORIDA 33607
46131 281.2222
TELECOPY 16131 281.0128
SIGNATURE PLAZA. SUITE 1060
201 SOUTH ORANGE AVENUE
ORLANDO. FLORIDA 32801
'4071 4X6.7595
TELECOPY 14071 426-6022
WILLIAM J. ROBERTS
Of COUNSEL
WILLIAM D. TYLER DISTRIBU'nON LIST
MICHAEL L. WATKINS
JEAN E. WILSON Commissioners
Admini3trator
Fran Adams Attarrey
County Commission Persai -el
Indian River County Pubiic ftnk3
1840 25th Street Ccm tufft Day.
Vero Beach, Florida 32960 utiimra
Financo
Re: Carson Platt Estate OMg
E merg. Sam
Dear Commissioner Adams: RIX. kIgt.
Other ,you will
Enclosed is a copy of item 4 from the Board of Trustees, Jun ag
note that the Land Acquisition and Management Advisory Council has been asked to review the
policy of not allowing counties to hold a title interest when participating in joint acquisitions. It
appears that this item will be approved without comment or controversy on June 9. The Lan
Acquisition and Management Advisory Council has agendaed this policy for discussion on July
2, 1998. I plan to be there to present the matter to the Council. From my further discussions with
Irby Green, Perry Odom, General Counsel and other staff members, we have not discovered any
objection to the joint ownership of these properties where counties participate financially.
Please call with any questions.
June 9, 1998
86
Sincerely,
Wiliam J. Roberts
Board of Trustees
Agenda - June 9, 1998
Page Three
Item 4 Carson Platt Estate Acquisition/South Florida Water Management District/
Sebastian Creek CARL Project
REQUEST: Authorization to jointly acquire with the South Florida Water Management
District 5,361 acres within the Sebastian Creek CARL Project from the Carson Platt Estate.
COUNTIES: Brevard and Indian River
LOCATION: Section 00, Township 30 South, Range 38 East; Section 00, Township 31
South, Range 37 East; and Sections 06 through 08 and 17 through 20, Township 31 South,
Range 38 East
CONSIDERATION: $5,013,805.86 (The Board of Trustees' 50 percent share of the total
purchase price of $10,027,611.72, to be adjusted upward or downward at the rate of $1,800
per acre for parcel 1 and $1,930.22 per acre for parcel 2, in accordance with the final surveyed
acreage)
STAFF. REMARKS: The Sebastian Creek CARL project is ranked number 7 on the CARL
Bargain/Shared Project List approved by the Board of Trustees on February 11, 1997, and
qualifies for purchase under the Division of State Lands' Land Acquisition Workplan. The
project contains 22,493 acres, of which 16,625 acres have been acquired. After the Board of
Trustees approves this agreement, 507 acres or 2 percent of this project will remain to be
acquired.
On October 25, 1994, the Board of Trustees authorized staff to enter into an acquisition
agreement with the St. Johns River Water Management District (District) to acquire the
Sebastian Creek CARL project in accordance with section 259.041(16), F.S. (1994) utilizing
the procedures set out in section 373.139, F.S., with some technical survey modifications that
have been incorporated into the agreement. On November 10. 1994, the Governing Board of
the District approved and executed the acquisition agreement and it has been executed by the
Director of the Division of State Lands on behalf of the Board of Trustees. On Julv 14. 1995,
the Land Acquisition Advisory Council approved the addition of the Carson Platt Estate
property to the project boundary.
The terms of the acquisition agreement between the District and the Board of Trustees
provided for equal participation in the acquisition and ownership of the subject property;
however, Indian River County (County) expressed an interest to the District in participating in
funding the acquisition. Staff recommends pursuing this purchase as a combination
bargain/shared acquisition. Under the current policy on bargain purchases, the Board of
Trustees will partner on half of the transaction with the County, with the County contributing
25 percent of the purchase price but not holding any title interest. The other half of the
transaction will have the Board of Trustees partnering with the District under the shared
criteria, which will have the District contributing 25 percent of the purchase price and holding
a 25 percent title interest. Pursuant to the terms of the acquisition agreement, the District
contracted to purchase the property at 82 percent of the approved value. The Board of
Trustees' purchase price will be 50 percent of the contract price negotiated by the District plus
June 9, 1998
87
BOOK '95
BOOK M PAGE 96
50 percent of the costs incurred in the purchase of the property. Title to the property acquired
will vest jointly in the Board of Trustees and the District with the Board of Trustees holding a
75 percent interest and the District holding a 25 percent interest. While thb County has agreed
to participate in this transaction under the current bargain criteria, it has requested and staff
intends to ask the Land Acquisition and Management Advisory Council to review the policy of
not allowing counties to hold a title interest when participating in joint acquisitions.
As provided for in the acquisition agreement, on March 11, 1998, as amended on May 13, 1998,
the Governing Board of the District adopted Resolution No. 98-16, requesting the Board of
Trustees' share of the purchase price for the Carson Plan Estate parcel and reimbursement of 50
percent of its closing costs. Pursuant to the acquisition agreement, the Board of Trustees' share of
the preacquisition and closing costs will be reimbursed from CARL incidental expense funds.
The District's resolution contains all of the assurances required by the acquisition agreement.
The Indian River County Commission adopted Resolution No. 98-52 on April 28, 1998,
authorizing the County's 25 percent participation in the joint acquisition.
The property will be managed jointly by the Division of Marine Resources, as the lead
manager, and the District as a part of the St. Sebastian River State Buffer Preserve.
This acquisition is consistent with section 187.201(10), F.S., the Natural Systems and
Recreational Lands section of the State Comprehensive Plan.
(See Attachment 4, Pages 1-29)
RECONEMFM APPROVAL
There was a brief discussion on this matter which resulted in the following motion.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Macht, SECONDED BY
Commissioner Ginn, the Board unanimously requested,
authorized, and approved Commissioner Adams to represent the
Indian River County Board of County Commissioners at the
LAMAC Meeting on July 2, 1998, in Tallahassee.
June 9, 1998
88
13.E. COMMISSIONER GINN - CHILDREN'S SERVICES
NETWORK
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of June 4, 1998:
To: County Administrator James Chandler
County Commissioners RECEIVE O
From: Commissioner Caroline Ginn JUN - 4 1998
Date: June 4, 1998 CLERK TO THE BOARD
Subject: Childrens' Services Network
When the Childrens' Services Network Ordinance was adopted by the Board of County
Commissioners on May 13, 1997, it was expected that the guidelines put in place by the
Childrens' Services Network Guide would be followed.
In actual practice, the CSNetwork Guide has been ignored and the Childrens' Services
Network has proceeded as if the Guide did not exist.
An April 27, 1998 memo (attachment B) from Assistant County Attorney, Terrence O'Brien
calling attention to these. deficiencies, has also been ignored.
The procedures as specified in Chapter 111- Needs Assessmen4 Priorities & Planning
of the Guide, (Attachment A) contain safeguards to protect the public purse. The
following sequential steps are to be followed:
1. A Needs Assessment will determine the identification of
unmet and undermet needs.
2. Asset Mapping will identify programs, services and activities
currently in Place in the county.
3. A PRIORITY LIST is to be established based on the results of
the Needs Assessment .
4. RFPs (Requests for Proposals) are to be INITIATED based
upon the recommended priority listing
5. A CHILDRENS' SERVICES PLAN is to be developed.
THE PLAN IS TO INCLUDE:
*An Executive Summary with results of the Needs
Assessment, PRIORITIZED NEEDS and
recommended programs to meet those needs WITH
A THREE-YEAR STRATEGIC PLAN and a ONE YEAR
OPERATING PLAN.
THE CURRENT SITUATION:
*Needs Assessment data is presently being analyzed under a
contract with consultants Hershberg/ Salter. The School District
has provided funding through a SSN (Shared Services Network)
grant from the Department of Education. Results of the study are
due in MID- JUNE.
June 9, 1998
:t
mox push 97
WK too KE
*An RFP (Request for Proposal) (Attachment C) was placed on the
Board of County Commissioners Consent Agenda, March 24,
1998. The RFP contained five objectives whose development
and basis are unknown. There was no reference to
documentation which could be found in a Needs Assesment,
Asset Mapping or priority list - obviously because none existed
at that time nor exists as this memo is written.
Much time has been spent by the CSNetwork Grant Review
Committee Interviewing those agencies who responded to the
RFP, and yet there has been no established data to suggest these
agencies represent any unmet or undermet need.
I would suggest that the principles established under the Guide are necessary to protect
the public's interest and to restrain special Interests. Therefore, it is imperative that Guide
be followed.
It is essential that the County makes every effort to safeguard this THE INITIAL EFFORT
of the CSNetwork if the Network is to gain and maintain its credibility. Proceeding along the
present path will result in loss of public and agency confidence.
It is my recommendation that a new RFP be initiated AFTER THE HERSHBERG/SALTER
ANALYSIS IS AVAILABLE AND A PRIORITY LIST HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED. Until the
county has followed the steps as presented in the Ordinance and Guide, there can be no
assurance of public money being spent on verifiable needs.
Commissioner Ginn asked why the CSN guide was not followed in their recent
meetings.
Vice Chairman Macht responded that the reason was the inability of developing the
needs assessment to its full maturity in the limited time as the budget review period was
quickly approaching. He had come to the Board and asked for some tolerance in developing
priorities with the information on hand, that is, the raw data, tempered with experience in the
community. The CSN has been very fortunate to have that experience. The need is so great
in our community for people who have suffered the breakdown of family and economics'
impact. In listening to the applications, family breakdown has generated the greatest
majority of ills on the children. There is no doubt. that a substantial amount of good could
be done now with the benefit of County funding. He felt very comfortable in the
recommendations coming back from the CSN, which will be refined. Next year, with the aid
of Dr. Herschberg's report, he has every hope that they are refined to the degree that he
believes will satisfy everyone. In the meantime, it is necessary to get started and attend to
the needs out there of children who are at the mercy of dysfunctional families and predators
in their neighborhoods. He felt it was government's responsibility to act in concert with
private caregivers to do what we can in the name of humanity.
June 9, 1998
.O
0 0
Commissioner Ginn once again emphasized her point that the guide should have been
followed, speaking in the name of the taxpayers. She found it difficult to understand why
the safeguards in the guide have not been followed in this year's decision-making process.
There had been a memorandum from the County Attorney that this would be problematic
without response. She felt that some of the applicants did not qualify under children's
programs. It seemed to her that we have not discovered what the under -met and unmet needs
are and that the County will be appropriating money to organizations already operating. To
her, there were many unknowns. She also complained that she had not received any
Minutes of the most recent CSN meetings although she understood the secretarial crunch.
She did not fault the members of the Network and felt they had not had the proper
information upon which to act.
Commissioner Ginn recommended that there be no dollars allocated to agencies
through the CSN for FY 1998-99, that those who have applied for County funding in the past
may do so again at budget time, but no new agencies will be considered for funding over the
next fiscal year, and that any dollars budgeted be charged against the allocation of the
$300,000 for FY 1998-99. It should be set up correctly, so that the public's interest is
protected and special interests are restrained.
Commissioner Ginn felt the report of Mr. Herschberg was confusing and described
it as very difficult to understand. He had problems with the raw data and cannot seem to
come to any conclusions which mean anything. It is a lot of guess -work and she thought the
taxpayers would not stand for guess -work.
Commissioner Eggert stated that she has supported the CSN from the beginning. It
has become somewhat awkward by suggesting that they go ahead with the requests for
proposals. In speaking with people at Community Health Network who were involved in the
CSN initially, she learned that they are concerned with the procedure. She also was
concerned with the procedure. She stated she agreed with much of what Commissioner Ginn
said, however, she had great confidence in Joyce Johnston. She inquired how much
additional time Mr. Herschberg has requested.
Vice Chairman Macht responded that Augustl2th is the deadline for the asset
mapping (which is his last task).
Commissioner Eggert stressed that date was still within our public hearing process
period for the budget. She felt that having said to go forward with the RFP that the Board
has set something in motion which is next to impossible to stop at this point. She did not
June 9, 1998
91
BOOK PAGE 99
BOOK 106 PAGE 6O
agree that we do not know what the needs are in the community. She would love to see a
well-done asset mapping. She felt that they should proceed with extraordinary care.
Debate continued at length between Commissioner Ginn and Vice Chairman Macht.
Commissioner Adams thought the Board had to remember that we have a committee
charged with the responsibility to bring back recommendations to the Board of County
Commissioners. Regardless, the time to address it is when they bring it back to the Board
and we should not intervene in the budget process underway. Each committee has their tasks
and we may or may not agree with their recommendations. She suggested that
Commissioner Ginn let the process move forward and deal with problems when the
committee brings their recommendations to them. She thought that was the time to do it, that
now was not the appropriate time.
Commissioner Ginn still did not agree. She felt that her greatest fears have been
realized.
Chairman Tippin ruled that there would be no public discussion on this item.
NO ACTION TAKEN.
14.A. EMERGENCY SERVICES DISTRICT
The Chairman announced that immediately upon adjournment of the meeting the
Board would reconvene sitting as the Board of Commissioners for the Emergency Services
District.
Those Minutes are being prepared separately.
U.B. SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL DISTRICT
The Chairman announced that immediately upon adjournment of the Emergency
Services District meeting the Board would reconvene sitting as the Board of Commissioners
for the Solid Waste Disposal District
Those Minutes are being prepared separately.
June 9, 1998
92
There being no further business, upon motion duly made and seconded, the Chairman
adjourned the meeting at 11:25 a.m.
ATTEST:
Jeffrey K. Barton, Clerk
Minutes approved d'/�&
June 9, 1998
93
%John W. Ti'
ppin, Chauman
BOOK 106 PAGE D