HomeMy WebLinkAbout7/7/1998i
MINUTES ATTACHED
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
A G E N D A
TUESDAY, JULY 7,1998
9:00 A.M. - COUNTY COMMISSION CHAMBER
County Administration Building
1840 25th Street, Vero Beach, Florida 32960
John W. Tippin, Chairman (District 4)
Kenneth R Macht, Vice Chairman (District 3)
Fran B. Adams (District 1)
Carolyn K. Eggert (District 2)
Caroline D. Ginn (District 5)
9:00 a.m. 1. CALL TO ORDER
James E. Chandler, County Administrator
Charles P. Vitunac, County Attorney
Jeffrey K. Barton, Clerk to the Board
BACKUP
2. INVOCATION Pastor Jack Hart, New Hope Ministries PAGES
3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE - Comm. John W. Tippin
4. ADDITIONS to the AGENDA/EMERGENCY ITEMS
1. Add Item S, Presentation to Commissioner Adams of photograph as "Queen of Swamp Buggies^.
2. Add Item I IX, 1999-99 Budget Hearing Dates.
3. Add Item 13.B., Florida Intermodal Transportation Summit report and nomination to the Govemor's Freight Task Fonio.
4. Add Item 13.C, rand Acquisition and Management Advisory Committee meeting report regarding the CounWs desire for shared
title to environmental land acquisitions.
5. PROCLAMATION and PRESENTATIONS
None
6. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
A. Regular Meeting of June 9, 1998
B. Regular Meeting of June 16, 1998
7. CONSENT AGENDA
A. Approval of Warrants
(memorandum dated June 18, 1998) 1-8
B. Consideration of Consultant Rankings for I-95 /
Oslo Rd. Interchange Justification Report Project
(memorandum dated June 29, 1998) 9-10
C. Laurel Homes Inc.'s Request for Final Plat
Approval for a Single Family Subdivision to be
Known as Phases 3 & 4 of The Laurels S/D
(memorandum dated June 30,1998) 11-19
D. Consultant Selection Beach Preservation Plan -
Economic Analysis
(memorandum dated June 25, 1998) 20-30
9:05 A.M.
C.0 C, F, AG rnUL 1,9
BACKUP
7. CONSENT AGENDA (cont'd.): PAGES
E. Sandridge Golf Course Monitoring
Professional Services / Release of Retainage
(memorandum dated June 22, 1998) 31-32
F. Payments to Vendors of Court Related Costs
(memorandum dated June 19, 1998) 33
G. Special Law Enforcement Trust Fund, Fund 112
(memorandum dated June 30, 1998) 34
8. CONSTITUTIONAL OFFICERS and
GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES
None
9. PUBLIC ITEMS
A. PUBLIC HEARINGS
Hale Indian River Groves, Inc., Request to Amend
The Comprehensive Plan to Redesignate f2.7 Acres
from C/I to L-2, and to Rezone those f2.7 Acres
from CL to RM -6; to Amend the Comprehensive
Plan to Redesignate f2.7 Acres from L-2 to C/I, and
to Rezone those f2.7 Acres from RM -6 to CG; and
to Rezone f2.1 Acres from CL to CG
(memorandum dated June 24, 1998) 35-57
B. PUBLIC DISCUSSION ITEMS
Request from Glenn Legwen to Discuss Children
Services Network Budgeting Process
(letter dated June 15, 1998) 58-66
C. PUBLIC NOTICE ITEMS
Public Hearings for July 14, 1998:
(1) Request by Robert Cook for special exception
use approval for an agricultural business to be
located on the north side of 26th St., approx.
1/4 mile west of 74th Ave.
(2) Request to approve purchase of the Spallone/
Archie Carr LAAC site
(memorandum dated June 30, 1998) 67
10. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S MATTERS
None
11. DEPARTMENTAL MATTERS
A. Community Development
Board Approval of Contract with Smith Environmental
Services, Inc., for Development of a Sebastian Area -
Wide Scrub Jay Habitat Conservation Plan (HCP)
(memorandum dated June 30, 1998)
68-85
0 - 0
-
BACKUP
11. DEPARTMENTAL MATTERS (cont'd.):
PAGES
B. Emergency Services
None
C. General Services
None
D. Leisure Services
None
E. Office of Management and Budget
None
F. Personnel
None
G. Public Works
Purchase of Replacement Vehicle for Engineering
Division
- (memorandum dated June 24, 1998)
86-88
H. Utilities
West Meadows Water Services, 45th Avenue and
45th Court, North of 4th St., Resolution IV, Final
Assessment
(memorandum dated June 10, 1998)
89-105
12. COUNTY ATTORNEY
Resolution Appointing Value Adjustment Board Members
and Providing for Per Diem Compensation for Value Adjust-
ment Board Members
(memorandum dated June 23, 1998)
106-108
13. COMMISSIONERS ITEMS
A. Chairman John W. Ti nnin
B. Vice Chairman Kenneth R. Macht
C. Commissioner Fran B. Adams
D. Commissioner Carolyn K. Eggert
100K 106 FnE l"03
r
EODK U FADE
13. COMMISSIONERS ITEMS (cont'd i• BACKUP
PAGES
E. Commissioner Caroline D. Ginn
14. SPECIAL DISTRICTSBOARDS
A. Emergency Services District
None
B. Solid Waste Disposal District
None
C. Environmental Control Board
None
15. ADJOURNMENT
Anyone who may wish to appeal any decision which may be made at this meeting will need
to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made which includes the testimony and
evidence upon which the appeal will be based.
Anyone who needs a special accommodation for this meeting may contact the county's
Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) coordinator at 567-8000 x408 at least 48 hours in advance
of meeting.
Meeting may be broadcast live on TCI Cable Channel 13 - rebroadcast various times
throughout the week
Falcon Cable Channel 35 - rebroadcast Friday evening
•
is
INDEX TO MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING
OF BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
JULY 7, 1998
1. CALL TO ORDER .............................................. -1-
2. INVOCATION .................................................. 1-
3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ...................................... .1-
4. ADDITIONS TO THE AGENDA ................................... 1-
5. PROCLAMATIONS AND PRESENTATIONS ........................ .2 -
PRESENTATION TO COMMISSIONER ADAMS OF PHOTOGRAPH AS "QUEEN OF SWAMP
BUGGIES".................................................2-
6. APPROVAL OF MINUTES ........................................ 2-
7. CONSENT AGENDA ............................................
3-
7.A.
List of Warrants ............................................
3-
7.B.
I-95/Oslo Road Interchange Justification Report Project - Consideration
of
-
Consultant Rankings - Reynolds, Smith & Hills ....................
8-
7.C.
Laurel Homes, Inc. - Final Plat Approval for Single Family Subdivision
to
be Known as Phases 3 & 4 of The Laurels Subdivision .............
.9-
7.D.
Beach Preservation Plan - Economic Analysis - Consultant Selection -
Applied Technology & Management .........................
.11-
7.E.
Sandridge Golf Course - Monitoring Professional Services - Release of
Retainage - Kimley-Horn ...................................
.12-
7.F.
Payments to Vendors of Court Related Costs ....................
.13-
7.G.
Sheriff - Special Law Enforcement Trust Fund - Fund 112 .........
.14 -
JULY 7, 1998FA_r "
EOK s"",
9.A. PUBLIC HEARING - ORDINANCES 98-17 AND 98-18 - HALE INDIAN
RIVER GROVES, INC. - AMEND THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TO
REDESIGNATE f2.7 ACRES FROM C/I TO L-2 AND TO REZONE THOSE
X2.7 ACRES FROM CL TO RM -6 - AMEND THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
TO REDESIGNATE f2.7 ACRES FROM L-2 TO C/I AND TO REZONE
THOSE ±2.7 ACRES FROM RM -6 TO CG AND TO REZONE f2.1 ACRES
FROMCL TO CG ............................................. .15-
9.B. PUBLIC DISCUSSION ITEM - GLENN LEGWEN - CHILDREN'S SERVICES
NETWORK BUDGETING PROCESS ............................. .32-
9.C. PUBLIC NOTICE ITEMS .................................... ..40-
9.C.1. Robert Cook - Request for Special Exception Use Approval for Agricultural
Business to be Located on the North Side of 26* Street, Approximately 1/4
mile West of 74' Avenue .................................. -40-
9.C.2. Spallone/Archie Carr LAAC Site - Request to Approve Purchase .... -40-
1 LA. SEBASTIAN AREA -WIDE SCRUB JAY HABITAT CONSERVATION PLAN
(HCP) - CONTRACT FOR DEVELOPMENT WITH SMITH
ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC . ............................ .42-
1 LE. 1998-99 BUDGET HEARING DATES RESCHEDULED ............... .44-
11.G. REPLACEMENT VEHICLE FOR ENGINEERING DIVISION OF PUBLIC
WORKS DEPARTMENT - VERO LINCOLN -MERCURY - 1998 JEEP
CHEROKEE ................................................. .45-
1 LH. RESOLUTION 98-70 - FINAL ASSESSMENT - WEST MEADOWS WATER
SERVICES - 45TH AVENUE AND 45TH COURT - NORTH OF 4TH STREET -46-
12. RESOLUTION 98-71 - APPOINTING 1998 VALUE ADJUSTMENT BOARD
(VAB) MEMBERS AND PROVIDING FOR PER DIEM COMPENSATION -52-
JULY 79 1998
B.B. FLORIDA INTERMODAL TRANSPORTATION SUMMIT REPORT AND
NOMINATION TO THE GOVERNOR'S FREIGHT TASK FORCE ...... .54-
B.C. LAND ACQUISITION AND MANAGEMENT ADVISORY COMMITTEE
MEETING REPORT REGARDING THE COUNTY'S DESIRE FOR SHARED
TITLE TO ENVIRONMENTAL LAND ACQUISITIONS .............. .55 -
JULY 79 1998
-3- �''�,,� �1 PnE 1:97
I
July 7, 1998
REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS
The Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida, met in Regular
Session at the County Commission Chambers, 1840 25t` Street, Vero Beach, Florida, on
Tuesday, July 7, 1998, at 9:00 a.m. Present were John W. Tippin, Chairman; Kenneth R
Macht, Vice Chairman; Fran B. Adams; Carolyn K. Eggert; and Caroline D. Ginn. Also
present were James E. Chandler, County Administrator; William G. Collins, II, Deputy
County Attorney; and Patricia "PJ" Jones, Deputy Clerk.
1. CALL TO ORDER
Chairman Tippin called the meeting to order.
2. INVOCATION
Commissioner Caroline Ginn delivered the Invocation.
3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Chairman Tippin led the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag.
4. ADDITIONS TO THE AGENDA
Chairman Tippin requested two additions to today's Agenda:
1. Item 5, Presentation to Commissioner Adams of photograph as "Queen of
Swamp Buggies".
2. Item I LE., 1998-99 Budget Hearing Dates.
Commissioner Macht requested the addition of Item 13.B., Florida Intermodal
Transportation Summit report and nomination to the Governor's Freight Task Force.
JULY 79 1998
r,
� 0 0 K 10 D"i- iQj9
Commissioner Adams requested the addition of Item 13.C., Land Acquisition and
Management Advisory Committee meeting report regarding the County's desire for shared
title to environmental land acquisitions.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert,
SECONDED by Commissioner Ginn, the Board
unanimously added the above items to the Agenda.
5. PROCLAMATIONS AND PRESENTATIONS
PRESENTATION TO COMMISSIONERADAMSOFPHOTOGRAPHAS "QUEEN OF
SWAMPBUGGIES"
Chairman Tippin stated that he had attended the groundbreaking ceremony for Mesa
Park last weekend while Commissioner Adams was fighting the County's battles in
Tallahassee. Jeff Parsons, President of Mesa Park, asked him to make a presentation to
Commissioner Adams of a beautiful color picture of her in a swamp buggy, proclaiming her
"Queen of Swamp Buggies".
Commissioner Adams thanked Chairman Tippin for the "dubious" distinction.
6. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
The Chairman asked if there were any corrections or additions to the Minutes of the
Regular Meetings of June 9, 1998 and June 16, 1998. There were none.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert,
SECONDED by Commissioner Ginn, the Board
unanimously approved the Minutes of the Regular
Meetings of June 9, 1998 and June 16, 1998, as
written.
JULY 79 1998
40 0
0
7. CONSENT AGENDA
7.A. LIST OF WARRANTS
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of June 18, 1998:
TO: HONORABLE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
DATE: JUNE 18, 1998
SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF WARRANTS
FROM: EDWIN M. FRY, JR.. FINANCE DIRECTOR
In compliance with Chapter 136.06. Florida Statutes. all warrants issued
by the Board of County Commissioners are to be recorded in the Board minutes.
Approval is requested for the attached list of warrants. issued by the Clerk
to the Board, for the time period of Junell to June 18. 1998.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert,
SECONDED by Commissioner Adams, the Board
unanimously approved the list of Warrants as issued
by the Clerk to the Board for the period from June
11, 1998 through June 18, 1998, as recommended by
staff.
CHECK
NAME
CHECK
CHECK
NUMBER
DATE
AMOUNT
0019455
WILLIAMS, TOBIAS M
1998-06-11
401.00
0019456
AMERICAN DENTAL PLAN (FLORIDA)
1998-06-17
1,921.18
0239081
CONVENTION HOUSING BUREAU# THE
1998-03-19
.00
0241099
POSTMASTER
1998-04-23
.00
0241202
ZIMMERMANN, KARL
1998-04-23
.00
0242555
BROWN, CHARLES Y & EDITH M
1998-05-21
.00
0243006
BECHT, TONYA AND CITY OF VERO
1998 -OS -21
.00
0243130
WILLIAMS, TOBIAS M
1998-05-21
.00
0243176
BILLING SERVICES INC
1998 -OS -28
.00
0243289
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
1998-05-28
.00
0243295
KNIGHT & MATHIS, INC
1998-05-28
.00
0243783
DOCTORS' CLINIC
1998-06-11
.00
0243982
A A FIRE EQUIPMENT, INC
1998-06-18
54.00
0243983
ACE PLUMBING, INC
1998-06-18
120.00
0243984
ACTION TRANSMISSION AND
1998-06-18
180.00
0243985
AERO PRODUCTS CORPORATION
1998-06-18
1,561.62
0243986
ALPHA ACE HARDWARE
1998-06-18
6.50
0243987
AMERICAN BUSINESS INTERIORS
1998-06-18
46.62
0243988
APPLE INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY CO
1998-06-18
388.05
0243989
APPLE MACHINE & SUPPLY CO
1998-06-18
380.85
0243990
AT YOUR SERVICE
1998-06-18
1,911.20
0243991
ATCO TOOL SUPPLY
1998-06-18
153.30
0243992
AUTO SUPPLY CO OF VERO BEACH,
1998-06-18
335.27
0243993
ABS PUMPS, INC
1998-06-18
19,200.26
JULY 79 1998
I
CHECK
NAME
CHECK
CHECK
NUMBER
DATE
AMOUNT
0243994
ALL POWER SERVICES, INC
1998-06-18
333.50
0243995
ALPHA HEALTH SERVICE, INC
1998-06-18
2,059.23
0243996
ADDISON OIL CO
1998-06-18
48.38
0243997
A T & T WIRELESS SERVICES
1998-06-18
89.32
0243998
ALBIN, DIANE
1998-06-18
92.72
0243999
A T & T
1998-06-18
76.01
0244000
ATLANTIC COASTAL TITLE CORP
1998-06-18
124.00
0244001
ANIMAL MEDICAL CLINIC
1998-06-18
40.00
0244002
ALL COUNTY EQUIPMENT COMPANY
1998-06-18
303.87
0244003
ALBERTSON'S PHARMACY
1998-06-18
181.18
0244004
AUTO PARTS OF VERO, INC
1998-06-18
871.62
0244005
AVATAR UTILITY SERVICES, INC
1998-06-18
10,925.71
0244006
ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES
1998-06-18
213.50
0244007
APPERSON CHEMICALS,INC
1998-06-18
6,629.65
0244008
ALTERATIONS
1998-06-18
32.50
0244009
ALL AMERICAN CONCRETE
1998-06-18
29,764.52
0244010
ANCHOR AUDIO, INC
1998-06-18
181.72
0244011
BAIRD, JOSEPH A
1998-06-18
373.00
0244012
BAKER DISTRIBUTING CO
1998-06-18
68.09
0244013
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
1998-06-18
6,898.57
0244014
BECHT, TONYA AND CITY OF VERO
1998-06-18
70.00
0244015
BLACRHAWR QUARRY COMPANY
1998-06-18
164.48
0244016
BOOK CENTER OF VERO BEACH
1998-06-18
184.95
0244017
BELLSOUTH MOBILITY
1998-06-18
34.26
0244018
BARTON, JEFFREY K -CLERK
1998-06-18
3,515.25
0244019
BERGGREN EQUIPMENT CO, INC
1998-06-18
180.81
0244020
B & B INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY CO.
1998-06-18
2,304.59
0244021
BOYNTON PUMP & IRRIGATION
1998-06-18
120.76
0244022
BAKER & TAYLOR ENTERTAINMENT
1998-06-18
85.04
0244023
BELLSOUTH
1998-06-18
3,103.90
0244024
BAKER & TAYLOR INC
1998-06-18
288.09
0244025
BRITTO, CAROLE M.
1998-06-18
500.00
0244026
BELLSOUTH
1998-06-18
334.33
0244027
CAMERON & BARKLEY COMPANY
1998-06-18
364.80
0244028
CAMP, DRESSER & MCKEE, INC
1996-06-18
13,340.00
0244029
CARTER ASSOCIATES, INC
1998-06-18
356.25
0244030
CARTER, MARVIN
1998-06-18
62.06
0244031
CLEMENTS PEST CONTROL
1998-06-18
443.00
0244032
COASTAL GRAPHICS
1998-06-18
244.00
0244033
COLD AIR DISTRIBUTORS
1998-06-18
745.75
0244034
COLKITT SHEET METAL & AIR, INC
1998-06-18
47.00
0244035
COMMUNICATIONS INT'L INC
1998-06-18
1,710.00
0244036
CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
1998-06-18
25,510.21
0244037
CLINIC PHARMACY
1998-06-18
307.76
0244038
CARDINAL ROOFING & SIDING, INC
1998-06-18
30.00
0244039
CITGO PETROLEUM CORP
1998-06-18
2,422.19
0244040
CLIFF BERRY ENVIRONMENTAL
1998-06-18
260.00
0244041
COOGAN, MAUREEN
1998-06-18
387.28
0244042
CALL ONE, INC
1998-06-18
23.14
0244043
CROSSROADS ANIMAL HOSPITAL
1998-06-18
91.00
0244044
CALCIQUEST, INC
1998-06-18
15,740.54
0244045
CARSON, ERIC
1998-06-18
10.00
0244046
CENTRAL PUMP & SUPPLY INC
1998-06-18
22.22
0244047
CENTER FOR EMOTIONAL AND
1998-06-18
342.00
0244048
CONSOLIDATED RESOURCE RECOVERY
1998-06-18
35,989.96
0244049
CUSTOM TRAILER, INC
1998-06-18
2,530.00
0244050
SUSAN DIAL
1998-06-18
1.00
0244051
C B C PRINTING
1998-06-18
2,661.38
0244052
CENTRAL AIR CONDITIONING &
1998-06-18
36.08
0244053
DELTA SUPPLY CO
1998-06-18
468.74
0244054
DEMCO INC
1998-06-18
29.38
0244055
DEPENDABLE DODGE, INC
1998-06-18
187.50
0244056
DICKERSON-FLORIDA, INC
1998-06-18
147,264.61
0244057
DON SMITH'S PAINT STORE, INC
1996-06-18
207.76
0244058
DATA SUPPLIES, INC
1998-06-18
3,789.20
0244059
DAVIDSON TITLES, INC
1996-06-18
293.18
0244060
DATA FLOW SYSTEMS, INC
1998-06-18
4,222.57
0244061
DRIVEWAYS INC
1998-06-18
7,096.23
0244062
DRUM, TERRY
1998-06-18
73.39
0244063'
DELRAY STAKES & SHAVINGS INC
1998-06-18
330.00
0244064
DUNKELBERGER ENGINEERING &
1998-06-18
6,118.75
0244065
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL
1998-06-18
125.00
0244066
DADE PAPER COMPANY
1998-06-18
379.90
0244067
DAVID BROOKER PROMOTIONS
1998-06-18
- 52.36
0244068
DATABASE TECHNOLOGIES INC
1998-06-18
35.00
0244069
DOCTORS' CLINIC
1998-06-18
681.90
0244070
ERRETT, NANCY
1998-06-18
137.52
0244071
ESSCO SUBSCRIPTION SERVICES
1998-06-18
4.22
JULY 79 1998
•
CHECK
NAME
CHECK
CHECK
NUMBER
DATE
AMOUNT
0244072
EMERGENCY MEDICINE ASSOCIATES
1998-06-18
195.00
0244073
EXPEDITER INC, THE
1998-06-18
73.96
0244074
ERICSSON, INC
1998-06-18
1,143.44
0244075
E. O. KOCH CONSTRUCTION
1998-06-18
500.00
0244076
FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP
1998-06-18
74.75
0244077
FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY
1998-06-18
26,910.40
0244078
FLORIDA TREND
1998-06-18
14.98
0244079
FRASER ENGINEERING & TESTING
1998-06-18
745.00
0244080
FIRST UNION NATIONAL BANK =
1998-06-18
1,400.00
024408f FALCON CABLE TV
1998-06-18
25.10
0244082
FLORIDA MUNICIPAL INSURANCE
1998-06-18
64,643.00
0244083
FLORIDA MEDICAID COUNTY
1998-06-18
51,280.23
0244084
FACTS ON FILE
1998-06-18
34.03
0244085
FAPPO, INC
1998-06-18
60.00
0244086
GLIDDEN COMPANY, THE
1998-06-18
111.66
0244087
GREYHOUND LINES, INC.
1998-06-18
400.00
0244088
GOODYEAR AUTO SERVICE CENTER
1998-06-18
1,755.96
0244089
GLOBAL COMPUTER SUPPLIES
1998-06-18
108.97
0244090
GALE RESEARCH, INC
1998-06-18
528.06
0244091
GOODYEAR COMMERCIAL TIRE &
1998-06-18
204.68
0244092
GEAC COMPUTERS INC
1998-06-18
2,424.00
0244093
GRILL REFILL, INC
1998-06-18
69.00
0244094
GE CAPITAL IT SOLUTIONS
1998-06-18
2,941.32
0244095
GRA, GRAND HARBOR INC
1998-06-18
32,968.00
0244096
GILLIS, BRIAN K
1998-06-18
4,327.50
0244097
GARDE, JOHN
1998-06-18
50.00
0244098
GREENHAVEN PRESS INC
1998-06-18
89,70
0244099
HARRIS SANITATION, INC
1998-06-18
183.10
0244100
HIGHSMITH, INC
1998-06-18
477.17
0244101
HORNUNG'S PRO GOLF SALES, INC
1998-06-18
586.08
0244102
HUMANE SOCIETY OF VERO BEACH
1998-06-18
18,240.00
0244103
HOLIDAY BUILDERS, INC
1998-06-18
500.00
0244104
HEDIN, KARL D
1998-06-18
250.00
0244105
HARRISON COMPANY PUBLISHERS
1998-06-18
87,70
0244106
HACH COMPANY
1998-06-18
17.25
0244107
HARRIS SANITATION, INC
1998-06-18
47,512.85
0244108
HTE, INC
1998-06-18
322.46
0244109
HIGHLANDS ANIMAL HOSPITAL
1998-06-18
80.50
0244110
HOMETOWN PET CARE CENTER
1998-06-18
68.00
0244111
HASSEY, WALTER
1998-06-18
30.00
0244112
HOLIDAY INN SUNSPREE RESORT
1998-06-18
162.00
0244113
HOLIDAY INN BEACHSIDE RESORT
1998-06-18
360.00
0244114
HOMELAND IRRIGATION CENTER
1998-06-18
952.64
0244115
HYDRO -AIR SYSTEMS
1998-06-18
169.70
0244116
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY SOLID
1998-06-18
6,275.73
0244117
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY HEALTH
1998-06-18
156.00
0244118
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
1998-06-18
200.00
0244119
INDIAN RIVER BATTERY, INC
1998-06-18
2,201.65
0244120
INDIAN RIVER BLUE PRINT, INC
1998-06-18
374.21
0244121
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY UTILITY
1998-06-18
673.45
0244122
INDIAN RIVER OXYGEN, INC
1998-06-18
480.25
0244123
INGRAM
1998-06-18
513.10
0244124
INTERSTATE BILLING SERVICE
1998-06-18
1,222.70
0244125
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
1998-06-18
129.10
0244126
INSURANCE SERVICING &
1998-06-18
275.00
0244127
IRVINE MECHANICAL, INC
1998-06-18
583.17
0244128
IBM CORPORATION
1998-06-18
46.00
0244129
INDIAN RIVER ALL -FAB, INC
1998-06-18
650.00
0244130
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
1998-06-18
121.13
0244131
INDIAN RIVER CREMATIONS INC
1998-06-18
612.00
0244132
IBM CORPORATION
1998-06-18
490.00
0244133
J C PENNEY
1998-06-18
95.00
0244134
JACOBS ELECTRIC MOTOR REPAIR
1998-06-18
214.50
0244135
JIM WRIGHT CONSTRUCTION
1998-06-18
19,620.00
0244136
JORDAN, ELIZABETH M
1998-06-18
137.15
0244137
J A A F SUMMER CONFERENCE
1998-06-18
100.00
0244138
JONES, DAVID M
1998-06-18
4,320.00
0244139
K MART
1998-06-18
177.33
0244140
KANAREK, PAUL B
1998-06-18
190.00
0244141
KIMLEY-HORN & ASSOCIATES, INC
1998-06-18
8,933.27
0244142
KING, JOHN W
1998-06-18
644.52
0244143
KNIGHT & MATHIS, INC
1998-06-18
836.78
0244144
K & S RIP RAP SERVICES
1998-06-18
3,080.00
0244145
KELLY TRACTOR CO
1998-06-18
893.22
0244146
KANO LABORATORIES, INC
1998-06-18
60.06
0244147
K S M ENGINEERING & TESTING
1998-06-18
11500.00
0244148
KIRBY AUTO SUPPLY FT PIERCE
1998-06-18
2,395.08
0244149
KT MOWER & EQUIPMENT
1998-06-18
165.86
0244150
KLINK, RICHARD
1998-06-18
1,254.00
0244151
K'S COMMERCIAL CLEANING
1998-06-18
320.00
0244152
LUCAS WATERPROOFING CO, INC
1998-06-18
990.00
0244153
L B SMITH, INC
1998-06-18
182.51
0244154
LOPRESTI, ETTA
1998-06-18
66.00
0244155
LANGSTON, HESS, BOLTON,ZNOSKO
1998-06-18
882.57
JULY 79 1998
•
_5_ f 00 i �i) FAIj
JULY 79 1998
CHECK
NAME
CHECK
CHECK
NUMBER
DATE
AMOUNT
0244156
MAXWELL PLUMBING, INC
1998-06-18
304.20
0244157
MICKLER'S FLORIDIANA, INC
1998-06-18
5.40
0244158
MID COAST TIRE SERVICE, INC
1998-06-18
223.90
0244159
MIRES GARAGE
1998-06-18
185.00
0244160
MORGAN AND EKLUND
1998-06-18
3,570.75
0244161
MARTIN FENCE CO
1998-06-18
5,101.00
0244162
3M CUSTOMER SERVICE
1998-06-18
1,253.00
0244163
MR BOB PORTABLE TOILET
1998-06-18
103.80
0244164
MARC INDUSTRIES
1998-06-18
21.02
0244165
MAX DAVIS ASSOCIATES INC
1998-06-18
172.40
0244166
MONIZ, DAVID J
1998-06-18
15.00
0244167
MARTIN, MARTY
1998-06-18
223.91
0244168
NOLTE, DAVID C
1998-06-18
450.00
0244169
NEFF MACHINERY, INC
1998-06-18
123.99
0244170
NORTH SOUTH SUPPLY
1998-06-18
838.43
0244171
NATIONAL PROPANE CORP
1998-06-18
168.47
0244172
NATIONAL BAG COMPANY, INC
1998-06-18
531.32
0244173
OFFICE PRODUCTS & SERVICE
1998-06-18
1,287.74
0244174
OFFICE DEPOT, INC
1998-06-18
5,837.38
0244175
OSCEOLA PHARMACY
1998-06-18
168.07
0244176
OBLER, JOHN
1998-06-18
63.75
0244177
OAK POINT DEVELOPMENT GROUP
1998-06-18
14,520.00
0244178
OLSSON, JAY E D.O
1998-06-18
500.00
0244179
PAN AMERICAN ENG CO
1998-06-18
240.00
0244180
PEACE RIVER ELECTRIC
1998-06-18
41.56
0244181
PUBLIC DEFENDER
1998-06-18
4,877.97
0244182
PROCTOR CONSTRUCTION
1998-06-18
2,000.00
0244183
PINKERTON, DOREEN A
1998-06-18
114.50
0244184
POSTMASTER
1998-06-18
10,000.00
0244185
PORT PETROLEUM, INC
1998-06-18
649.77
0244186
PRESS JOURNAL
1998-06-18
107.88
0244187
PAGE, LIVINGSTON
1998-06-18
45.50
0244188
PAGENET OF FLORIDA
1998-06-18
229.29
0244189
PIONEER METALS, INC
1998-06-18
771.00
0244190
PRESS JOURNAL - SUBSCRIPTION
1998-06-18
117.00
0244191
PRESS JOURNAL/STUART NEWS
1998-06-18
1,584.96
0244192
PRAXAIR DISTRIBUTION
1998-06-18
493.60
0244193
PRESS JOURNAL
1998-06-18
45.00
0244194
PECORARO, SALVATORE
1998-06-18
48.00
0244195
PILOT EQUIPMENT CO
1998-06-18
28.11
0244196
PALM PETERBUILT
1998-06-18
57.39
0244197
PRESERVATION RESOURCES
1998-06-18
665.50
0244198
RADIO SHACK ACCT RECEIVABLE
1998-06-18
604.78
0244199
RUSSELL CONCRETE, INC
1998-06-18
3,156.70
0244200
ROBINSON EQUIPMENT COMPANY,INC
1998-06-18
369.69
0244201
R & G SOD FARMS
1998-06-18-
180.00
0244202
RUBBER STAMP EXPRESS & MORE
1998-06-18
306.90
0244203
RUBBER & ACCESSORIES, INC
1998-06-18
445.06
0244204
RCL DEVELOPMENT
1998-06-18
500.00
0244205
RSR WHOLESALE SOUTH, INC
1998-06-18
4,232.97
0244206
ROCKS, KENNETH & MARGARET
1998-06-18
2,236.85
0244207
SCOTTY'S, INC
1998-06-18
750.37
0244208
SEBASTIAN SUN
1998-06-18
742.50
0244209
SOUTHERN CULVERT, DIV OF
1998-06-18
1,011.85
0244210
SOUTHERN ELECTRIC SUPPLY
1998-06-18
405.75
0244211
SOUTHSIDE ANIMAL HOSPITAL
1998-06-18
349.70
0244212
SUN COAST WELDING SUPPLIES INC
1998-06-18
89.13
0244213
SUNRISE FORD TRACTOR CO
1998-06-18
59.86
0244214
SUNSHINE PHYSICAL THERAPY
1998-06-18
45.00
0244215
ST LUCIE PAPER & PACKAGING,INC
1998-06-18
593.04
0244216
SERVICE REFRIGERATION CO, INC
1998-06-18
96.50
0244217
SHERWOOD, FRANCES G
1998-06-18
89.61
0244218
SCHOMMER, ALAN R
1998-06-18
500.00
0244219
SCHOOL DISTRICT OF IRC
1998-06-18
1,385.77
0244220
SAFETY EQUIP COMPANY
1998-06-18
5,499.65
0244221
SEXTON, HILDY
1998-06-18
80.00
0244222
SOFTWARE CITY
1998-06-18
95.00
0244223
STEWART MINING INDUSTRIES INC
1998-06-18
17,140.56
0244224
SEBASTIAN, CITY OF
1998-06-18
7,639.69
0244225
SOUTHEAST LIBRARY BINDERY,INC
1998-06-18
50.75
0244226
SOUTHERN LOCK AND SUPPLY CO
1998-06-18
34.91
0244227
SCHOOL DISTRICT OF IRC
1998-06-18
1,264.94
0244228
TREASURE COAST REFUSE CORP
1998-06-18
31,619.02
0244229
TINDALE OLIVER & ASSOC., INC
1998-06-18
2,939.69
0244230
TREASURE COAST CONTRACTING,INC
1998-06-18
20,097.00
0244231
TCI MEDIA SERVICES
1998-06-18
50.00
0244232
TRUGREEN CHEMLAWN
1998-06-18
_ 48.00
0244233
TRAX INC
1998-06-18
1,449.01
0244234
TALBOT, RITA
1998-06-18
180.00
0244235
TENNEYSON, HELEN
1998-06-18
1,417.00
0244236
TED ANDERSEN MASONRY
1998-06-18
3,800.00
0244237
UNIVERSITY PRESS OF FLA
1998-06-18
93.00
0244238
US FILTER DISTRIBUTION GROUP
1998-06-18
6,004.06
JULY 79 1998
•
JULY 79 1998
-7-
966,633.92
0
CHECK
CHECK
CHECK
NAME
DATE
AMOUNT
NUMBER
0244239
VELDE FORD, INC =
1998-06-18
1,619.40
0244240
'AERO BEACH, CITY OF _
1998-06-18
46.25
0244241
VERO CHEMICAL DISTRIBUTORS,INC
1998-06-18
77.10
0244242
VERO BEACH, CITY OF
1998-06-18
735.25
0244243
VERO BEACH POLICE DEPARTMENT
1998-06-18
25.00
0244244
VERO BEACH POWERTRAIN
1998-06-18
12.78
0244245
VOLUNTEER ACTION COMMITTEE
1998-06-18
25.00
0244246
VANTAGE EQUIPMENT CO
1998-06-18
274.80
0244247
WILSON'S PETROLEUM EQUIPMENT,
1998-06-18
110.00
0244248
W W GRAINGER, INC
1998-06-18
324.34
0244249
WQOL FM
1998-06-18
280.00
0244250
WAL-MART PHARMACY, INC
1998-06-18
89.46
0244251
WILLHOFF, PATSY
1998-06-18
260.00
0244252
WATERWORKS CAR WASH
1998-06-18
82.50
0244253
WOSN-FM RADIO STATION
1998-06-18
451.00
0244254
WAL*MART STORE 931
1998-06-18
158.42
0244255
WELLINGTON HOMES
1998-06-18
500.00
0244256
WORLDCOM
1998-06-18
54.66
0244257
WASTE MANAGEMENT
1998-06-18
85,120.75
0244258
WOODS, CURTIS A
1998-06-18
500.00
0244259
.XEROX CORPORATION
1998-06-18
268.00
0244260
ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE
1998-06-18
214.17
0244261
ZIMMERMANN, KARL
1998-06-18
29.25
0244262
ZEDER, KELLY
1998-06-18
18.56
0244263
ZIMLINGHAUS, BERNARD
1998-06-18
190.00
0244264
PEASE, CLINTON
1998-06-18
298.68
0244265
CURTIS, ROBERT
1998-06-18
338.18
0244266
STROLLO, ROCCO
1998-06-18
221.34
0244267
RICKLI, CHARLES
1998-06-18
43.33
0244268
BRANDON CAPITAL CORP
1998-06-18
7.74
0244269
CAL BUILDERS INC
1998-06-18
100.00
0244270
STRICKLAND, SELBY & WENDY
1998-06-18
34.05
0244271
GARCIA, ARTURO
1998-06-18
59.08
0244272
ESTATE OF EVELYN L FLINN
1998-06-18
84.14
0244273
SHOWCASE PROPERTIES LTD CO
1998-06-18
45.63
0244274
RIVERSIDE THEATRE
1998-06-18
14.72
0244275
DEES, ROBERT & DIANE
1998-06-18
47.64
0244276
SMITHSON, JEFF
1998-06-18
32.86
0244277
GALVEZ, OBDULIO E
1998-06-18
6.63
0244278
JENNINGS, DEBBIE
1998-06-18
89.48
0244279
MC KENZIE, ALBERT
1998-06-18
76.72
0244280
GHO VERO BEACH INC
1998-06-18
67.69
0244281
PATTERSON, DAVID T
1998-06-18
66.68
0244282
CORNERSTONE SELECT HOMES INC
1998-06-18
22.22
0244283
FROST, SCOTT
1998-06-18
52.97
0244284
FINN-AIKINS, XOFI
1998-06-18
46.49
0244285
MICHAEL MLEKO GENERAL CONTRACT
1998-06-18
32.52
0244286
DRITENBAS, JOHN & DIANA
1998-06-18
17.52
0244287
CERSOSIMO. ERNESTINE
1998-06-18
71.42
0244288
FILBURN, JESSE & ROBIN
1998-06-18
67.87
0244289
LEPP, BRADFORD
1998-06-18
32.98
0244290
MANZO, ANTHONY F
1998-06-18
52.67
0244291
BRYANT, ALLEIA
1998-06-18
52.57
0244292
COUNTRYMAN, TRACY
1998-06-18
23.05
0244293
MARINO, ANTHONY
1998-06-18
97.90
0244294
CAMERON CORPORATION
1998-06-18
78.83
0244295
MITCHELL, LORREN D
1998-06-18
72.80
0244296
REED, CHARLES
1998-06-18
20.34
0244297
FERRIO, SUSAN
1998-06-18
48.30
0244298
FINNEGAN, TODD
1998-06-18
9.55
0244299
AURELIEN, LAUDA
1998-06-18
16.09
0244300
LUTE, LESA R
1998-06-18
13.22
0244301
ST PETERS EPISCOPAL CHURCH
1998-06-18
45.70
0244302
OSBORNE, GREGORY W
1998-06-18
50.00
JULY 79 1998
-7-
966,633.92
0
r li��p," I
EOOK l� FAGS 4�I�
ZA I-95/0SLO ROAD INTERCHANGE JusTIFICATIONREPORT PROJECT -
CONSIDERATION OF CONSULTANT RANKINGS - REYNOLDS, SMITH &
HILLS
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of June 29, 1998:
TO: James Chandler
County Administrator
THROUGH: Robert M. Keating, AICP M K—
Community Development Director
FROM: Jacob Riger T
MPO Staff Planner
DATE: June 29, 1998
SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF CONSULTANT RANKINGS FOR I-95/OSL0
ROAD INTERCHANGE JUSTIFICATION REPORT (IJR) PROJECT
It is requested that the information presented herein be given formal consideration by the Board of
County Commissioners at its regular meeting of July 7, 1998.
One of the transportation improvements incorporated within the Indian River County Metropolitan
Planning Organization's (MPO) 2020 Long Range Transportation Plan is an interchange at I-95 and
Oslo Rd (91s St. SW). The interchange is reflected in the plan because of the area's growth potential.
In Indian River County as well as elsewhere, constructing an interchange is dependent upon state
and federal approval of an Interchange Justification Report (UR). Before funding and construction
may occur, an IJR must adequately justify the need for an interchange. At its February 10, 1998
meeting, the Board of County Commissioners approved the execution of a Joint Participation
Agreement with the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) to fund the preparation of the
IJR, but to delay the consultant selection process to allow time for other development proposals that
would increase the need and justification for an interchange to emerge in the I-95/Oslo Rd. area The
Board also directed staff not to initiate the consultant selection process without prior authorization
from the Board.
Due to a change in project -related circumstances, which relate to the possibility of funding for the
construction of the interchange to be made available in the near future, staff obtained authorization
from the Board at its April 14, 1998 meeting to initiate the consultant selection process for this
project. Therefore, on April 15, 1998, staff issued RFP # 8055 to solicit the services of a consultant
to prepare the IJR. After the RFP closing date of May 13, 1998, staff assembled a consultant
selection committee to shortlist the consultant firms that responded to the RFP and to rank the
shortlisted candidates for approval by the Board The committee members are: Bob Keating, Chris
Mora, Jim Davis, and Jim Scully (FDOT).
Of the six firms that responded to the RFP by the closing date, the following four firms were
shortlisted: Glatting Jackson; Keith and Schnars; Post Buckley; and Reynolds, Smith, and Hills. All
four firms gave presentations to the consultant selection committee on Friday, June 26, 1998. On
the basis of those presentations, the consultant selection committee ranked the four fines in order
of preference as follows: Reynolds, Smith, and Hills (RSH); Glatting Jackson; Post Buckley; and
Keith and Schnars.
JULY 79 1998
-8-
0 0
C
Once the Board approves the consultant selection committee's rankings, staff will negotiate a
contract with the top ranked consultant (RSH). If negotiations with the top-ranked consultant are
unsuccessful, staff will then negotiate with the second ranked firm. This procedure is mandated by
the Cotffiultants Competitive Negotiation Act CCNA), a law with which the Board must comply.
Once a contract has been negotiated, staff will bring the contract to the Board for its approval. It is
anticipated that this will occur in late July or early August.
Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners approve the consultant selection
committee's rankings of the consultants to prepare an Interchange Justification Report for the
proposed I-95/Oslo Road interchange. The rankings are as follows:
1. Reynolds, Smith, and Hills (RSH)
2. Glatting Jackson
3. Post Buckley
4. Keith and Schnars.
Staff further recommends that the Board of County Commissioners authorize staff to initiate contract
negotiations with the top ranked consultant (RSH).
ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert,
SECONDED by Commissioner Adams, the Board
unanimously approved the consultant selection
committee's rankings of the consultants to prepare
an Interchange Justification Report for the proposed
I-95/Oslo Road interchange and authorized staff to
initiate contract negotiations with the top-ranked
consultant, Reynolds, Smith, and Hills (RSH), as
recommended by staff.
DOCUMENTS WILL BE ON FILE IN THE
OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
WHEN EXECUTED AND RECEIVED
7.C. LAURELHOMES.ING -FINAL. PLA TAPPROVAL FOR SINGLE FAMMY
SUBDIVISION TO BE KNOWN AS PHASES 3 & 4 OF THE LAURELS
SUBDIVISION
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of June 30, 1998:
JULY 79 1998
•
-9 __UjPAGE Oda
TO: James E. Chandler
County Administrator
DIVUSION HEAD CONCURRENCE:
ohert M. Keating, AIC
Community Development Dire r
THROUGH: Stan Boling,14
Planning Director
FROM: John W. McCoy, AICP
Senior Planner, Current Development
DATE: June 30, 1998
SUBJECT: Laurel Homes Inc.'s Request for Final Plat Approval for a Single Family Subdivision
to be Known as Phases 3 & 4 of The Laurels Subdivision
It is requested that the data herein presented be given formal consideration by the Board of County
Commissioners at its regular meeting of July 7, 1998.
The Laurels Phases 3 & 4 is a subdivision of a 19.11 acre parcel into 56 single family lots and
stormwater tracts. The overall subdivision (Phases 1-4) will consist of 112 single family lots on a
total of 39.67 acres, resulting in an overall density of 2.84 units per acre. The subject property is
zoned RS -6, Residential Single Family (up to 6 units/acre).
On August 27, 1992, the Planning and Zoning Commission granted preliminary plat approval for
The Laurels subdivision to be completed in four phases. The first two phases are complete.
Subsequently, a land development permit was issued for construction of Phases 3 and 4. Since the
required improvements (e.g. roadways, stormwater management, utilities) for Phases 3 & 4 have
not been completed at this time, the developer is proposing to "bond -out" to guarantee the
satisfactory completion of the remaining work to be performed. The final plat was submitted with
the following documents:
A final plat that is substantially in conformance with the originally approved preliminary
plat;
2. A copy of the Contract for Construction of Required Subdivision Improvements;
ANALYSIS:
The final plat substantially conforms to the approved preliminary plat, but is not consistent with the
approved arrangement for the dedication of 10'" Street right-of-way. The approved preliminary plat
required a dedication of 25' of right-of-way for l Ot' Street (an existing unpaved road located in a 35'
wide "half street" right-of-way) with the condition that the developer escrow her fairshare for future
paving. Based on an opinion from the attorney's office, a decision has been made by staff to proceed
with final plat approval without a revised preliminary plat or compliance with the dedication
condition. Essentially, the attorney's office has determined that the right-of-way dedication cannot
be required since the subdivision streets are no longer connecting to 10* Street, as originally
proposed, and the subdivision will not be contributing trips to the street. The end result is that for
now, 10' Street will remain as it is. Only a stabilized, sodded emergency accessway will connect
the proposed subdivision to 10'h Street.
Not all of the required subdivision improvements have been completed as of this date. The
developer desires to proceed with recording the subdivision plat and proposes to "bond -out" for
construction of the remaining required subdivision improvements pursuant to provisions of
subdivision ordinance section 913.10. TIC developer has made arrangements with Public Works
and Utility Services to submit a final certified engineers cost estimate and letter of credit after the
Board of County Commissioners grants final plat approval. The final cost estimate will be based
on the work completed at that point in time as verified by county staff. The format of the letter of
credit has been approved by the county attorney's office, and unit costs for construction items have
been approved by Public Works and Utility Services. The developer has also submitted a copy of
JULY 7, 1998
-10-
`0 7
the Contract for Construction of Required Improvements. The contract, which is on a standard form
approved by the county attorney's office, will be executed by the developer after the July 7, 1998
Board meeting date. Once the final cost estimate is approved by staff and the appropriate letter of
credit is submitted, the plat will be recorded
Based upon the analysis performed, staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners
grant final plat approval for The Laurels Subdivision Phases 3 and 4, authorize the Chairman to
execute the final Contract for Construction (upon submittal), accept the posted security to guarantee
the Contract for Construction (upon submittal), and authorize staff to approve the amount of the
letter of credit.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert,
SECONDED by Commissioner Adams, the Board
unanimously granted final plat approval for The
Laurels Subdivision Phases 3 and 4, authorized the
Chairman to execute the final Contract for
Construction (upon submittal), accepted the posted
security to guarantee the Contract for Construction
(upon submittal), and authorized staff to approve the
amount of the letter of credit, as recommended by
staff.
DOCUMENTS ARE ON FILE IN THE
OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
7.D. BEACH PRESERVATION PLAN - ECONOMICANALYSIS -CONSULTANT
SELECTION - APPL IED TECHNOLOGY & MANAGEMENT
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of June 25, 1998:
TO: James E. Chandler,
County Administrator
THROUGH= James W. Davis, P.E. CONSENT AGENDA
Public Works Director
FROM: Jeffrey R. Tabar
Coastal Engineer
SUBJECT: Consultant Selection Beach Preservation Plan -
Economic Analysis
DATE: June 25, 1998
JULY 79 1998
-11-
.45_ • . -�n •0
On Wednesday June 24, 1998, the Selection committee received
presentations from short-listed consultants. The selection
committee members were Jim Davis, Jeffrey Tabar, cliff Suthard
(city of Vero), Ed Fry and Joe Baird.
As a result of the committee's investigation, the following
prioritized short-list is recommended for Board approval:
FIPPLIC-b
1. 4d*aaee& Technology & Management(ATM), Gainesville, FL.
2. Regional Research & Associates, Inc., Boca Raton, FL.
3. Fishkind & Associates, Inc., Orlando, FL.
Staff recommends authorization to proceed in contact negotiations
with the top ranked firm, ATM, Inc. of Gainesville, FL.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert,
SECONDED by Commissioner Adams, the Board
unanimously approved the prioritized short-list and
authorized staff to proceed in contract negotiations
with the top-ranked firm, Applied Technology &
Management (ATM), as recommended by staff.
7.E. SANDRIDGE GOLF COURSE -MONITORING PROFESSIONAL SERVICES -
RELEASE OF RETAINAGE - KWLEY--HORN
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of June 22, 1998:
TO: James Chandler
County Administrator
C:
THROUGH: James W. Davis, P.E./->,r,
Public Works Director— l}'
FROM: Terry B. Thompson, P.
Capital Projects Manager
SUBJECT: Sandridge Golf Course Monitoring
Professional Services
Release of Retainage
DATE: June 22, 1998
CONSENT
The final wetland monitoring report for Sandridge Golf Course has been submitted to the
St. Johns River Water Management District. The mitigation area has met the success
criteria outlined in the permit. The County must continue maintenance of the wetland, but
monitoring reports are no longer required.
Kimley-Horn is requesting final release of retainage in the amount of $819.99 for their
completed services.
JULY 79 1998
t
Staff recommends final release of retainage in1he amount of $619.99. Funding is from
Account 418-221-572-033.19.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert,
SECONDED by Commissioner Adams, the Board
unanimously approved the release of retainage to
Kimley-Horn in the
recommended by staff.
amount of $619.99, as
7.F. PAYMENTS TO VENDORS OF COURT RELATED COSTS
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of June 19, 1998:
TO: Board of County Commissioners
FROM: Terrence P. O'Brien, Assistant County Attorney
DATE: June 19, 1998'
SUBJECT: Payments to Vendors of Court Related Costs
The Office of the County Attorney has processed and approved payment to the following vendors
for the weeks of June 1 through June 15, 1998. Listed below are the vendors names and the
amount of each court related costs.
Investigative Support Special
Investigator
1,000.00
Indian River County School
Record Research
2.70
Wanda Bethea, Ed.D.
Clinical Evaluation
250.00
Helen Murray, L.M.H.C.
Clinical Evaluation
160.00
Don L. Schultz, M.D.
Clinical Evaluation
400.00
C. Jonathan Ahr, Ph.D.
Clinical Evaluation
500.00
A.J. Glaser, L-.P.N.
Clinical Evaluation
80.00
Don L. Schultz, M.D.
Clinical Evaluation
450.00
Barbara G. Schopp
Transcription
122.50
Sheila I. Flinn
Transcription
28.00
Carlos L. Wells, Esq.
Records Research
2.00
James Bass
Witness reimbursement
52.50
Treasure Coast Court Report
Court Reporter
25.00
Treasure Coast Court Report
Court Reporter
200.00
Treasure Coast Court Report
Court Reporter
25.00
James T. Long, Esq.
Public Defender Conflict(Juv)
1,200.00
James T. Long, Esq.
Public Defender Conflict(Misd)
600.00
James T. Long, Esq.
Public Defender Conflict(Fel)
8,400.00
Gregory Landrum, Psy. D.
Clinical Evaluation
750.00
Ralph Mora, Ph.D.
Clinical Evaluation
500.00
Ralph Mora, Ph.D.
Clinical Evaluation
750.00
Robert J. Brugnoli, Ph.D.
Clinical Evaluation
500.00
JR Reporting Associates
Transcription
265.00
Barbara Schopp
Transcription
31.50
Barbara Schopp
Transcription
52.50
Center for Counseling
Clinical Evaluation
150.00
Barbara Schopp
Transcription
38.50
Barbara Schopp
Transcription
59.50
Barbara Schopp
Transcription
136.50
Floyd Evans
Court Interpreter
25.00
JULY 79 1998
-13-
r. -J
C
2., Q...� � F, GF ads
Medical Record Services, Inc.
Record Research
JR Reporting Associates
Transcription
Shirley Corbin
Transcription
Shirley Corbin
Transcription
Shirley Corbin
Transcription
Shirley Corbin
Transcription
Medical Record Services, Inc.
Record Research
JR Reporting Associates
Transcription
Floyd Evans
Court Interpreter
Barbara Schopp
Transcription
Shirley Corbin
Transcription
Total
No action required or taken.
14.78
68.00
140.00
28.00
63.00
122.50
102.00
19.00
75.00
49.00
38.50
$17,475.98
7. G. SHERIFF -SPECIAL LAWENFORCEMENT TRUST FUND- FUND 112
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of June 30, 1998:
Yjerif f
wc_�,GARY
C. WHEELER • INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
MEMBER F_ORIDA SHERIFFS ASSOCIATION
MEMBER OF NATIONAL SHERIFFSASSOCIAT;ON
4055 41st AVENUE
VERO BEACH, FLORIDA 32960-1808 PHONE (561) 569-6700
June 30, 1998 ` -
JUL 01 1998
The Honorable John Tippin, Chairman
Indian River County Board of County Commissioners
1840 25* Street
Vero Beach, FL 32960-3394
Re: Special Law Enforcement Trust Fund, Fund 112
Dear Mr. Tippin:
This letter is a request to utilize monies from the Special Law Enforcement Trust Fund to purchase the
following items for use by this agency:
MPH Speed Monitor $ 11,210
This is a mobile speed sign trailer. The unit will be placed along busy
streets and highways to educate the public as to the speed they are traveling.
The unit has proven to reduce speeding while freeing officers for other
duties. This is also a traffic classifier that will record the traffic count
and speeds driven at a particular location.
In Car Video, 15 ea. O.P.V. Custom Cameras @ $3,200 ea. 48,000
Radar Units, 15 ea. Decatur Genesis II Units @ $1,769 ea. 26,535
Reserve Deputy Program:
10 ea. 92F Barretta pistols @ $346.70 3,467
10 ea. Ballistic vests @ $ 376.80 3.768
Total Request 92 980
I am requesting this item be placed on the "Consent Agenda" at your earliest convenience. If you have
any questions or any further information is required, please let me know.
Sincerely:
Gary Ceeler, Sheriff
The 173rd Internationally Accredited Law Enforcement Agency ,
Accredited by the Commission on Accreditation for Law Enforcement Agencies. Incorporated
JULY 79 1998
t 0
0 - 0
ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert,
SECONDED by Commissioner Adams, the Board
unanimously approved the Sheriff's request to utilize
monies from the Special Law Enforcement Trust
Fund to purchase the items listed, as recommended
by Sheriff Wheeler.
9.A. PUBLIC HEARING - ORDINANCES 98-17 AND 98-18 - HALE
INDIAN RIVER GROVES, INC. - AMEND THE
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TO REDESIGNATE f2.7 ACRES
FROM CI TO L-2 AND TO REZONE THOSE t2.7 ACRES
FROM CL TO RM -6 - AMEND THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
TO REDESIGNATE f2.7 ACRES FROM L-2 TO CI AND TO
REZONE THOSE t2.7 ACRES FROM RM -6 TO CG AND TO
REZONE t2.1 ACRES FROM CL TO CG
PRESS -JOURNAL
Published Daily
Vero Beach, Indian River County, Florida
COUNTY OF MAN RIVER: STATE OF FLORIDA
Before the tmdersWied authority personally appeared Darryl K. Mcks who on
oath says that he Presloent of the Press,lotunal, a daily neMrapaper pubusfred at Vero Beach
in lydien Rtver County. Florida that the attached copy of edvertlsemattt, being
a Kori �u
Affiant further says that the said Presa.lournel Is a newspaper published at Vero Beach, In
said Indian Rim County, Florida, and that the sed has heretofore been
cxmf jously published in said Indian Rives County, Florida, �ard has been entered as
second class mail matter at the post office In Vero Beach, In said Man River Camty, Florida,
for a period of one year next precx>dtrg the first pubUcafion of the attached copy of
advertlserrxjnt; and affiant further says that he has neither paid nor promised any person, firm
% or f0ar t lo or refund for the purpose of secur4►g little said newspaper.
My COMA S?ON HF RES
CO.i1M.N0.lCb1J092 :ti
e o jSEAL) : r.
c
JULY 79 1998
beforeme this day of \ ' yD.18
QT
Notary Public. State of Florida
My Commission Exp. Jan. 01, 2001
Comm. No. CC 611Q92
Personally Known kKr Produced ID 0
Type of ID Produced
-15-
FAGE;v1
..,..
n -19
NOTICE OF COMPREHENSIVE 1
PLAN LAND USE DESIGNATION
AMENDMENT
The Board of County Commis
stoners of Indian River County,
Florida, will consider the adoption
OF a county ordinance amending
the comprehensive plan's future
land use designation for land
within the unincorporated portions
of Indian Rhrer County. The subject
Property is owned by Hale Indian
River Graves, Inc. A public hearing
at which parties in interest and dti-
zen s shall have an opportunity to
be heard, will be held an Tuesday,
July 7, 1998 at 9:05 a.m.. in the
County Commission Chambers of
the County Administration Building,
located at 1840 25th Street, Vero
Beach, Florida. The proposed,
MW w*4&4nduded in -o pro-
posed ordinance w tRled:
AN ORDINANCE. OF INDIAN
RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA,
AMENDING THE FUTURE LAND
USE ELEMENT OF THE COMPRE-
HENSIVE PLAN BY CHANGING
THE LAND USE DESIGNATION
FOR:
1. +-2J ACRES LOCATED ON
THE EAST SIDE OF US 1, +-1.8
MILES NORTH OF CR 510, FROM
C/l, COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL,
TO L-2, LOW DENSITY
RESIDENTIAL -2 (UP•'. TO'.6
UNITS/ACRE); AND '
2. +-2.7 ACRES' LOCATED
+-315 FEET EAST OF US 1 AND
+4.8 MILES NORTH OF CR 510,
FROM L-2, LOW DENSITY
RESIDENTIAL -2 (UP TO 6
)UNITS/ACRE) TO C/I,
COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL;
AND PROVIDING CODIFICA-
j TION, SEVERABILITY, AND
EFFECTIVE DATE.
The plan amendment application
f may be Impeded by the public at
the Community Development,
Department located on the second
floor of the County. Administration
Building located at 1840 25th
Street, Vero .'Beach, Florida,
between the hours 8:30 a n� and
5:00 p.m. on weekdays. For more
information, contact John Wachtel
at 56741M, extension 247.
The proposed ordinance may be
impeded by the public between
8:30 a.m., and ,5:00' p.m. at the
affice of the Clerk to the Board of
County Commissioners; 1840 25th
Street, Vero Beach, Florida.
Anyone who may wish to
appeal any decision whk h may be
made at this meeting will need to
ensure that a verbatim , record of
the proceedings. is made, which
Includes the testimony, and ev1-
'dorm sid. upon which fhe.-appeal is. _
JULY 71,1998
Anyone who 'needs' o special
1 oaommodathon for this mosib
must corded the counly's Ameri-
cans with Disabilities (ADA) Coor-
dinator at 5674000, extension
223, at least 48 hours in advance
of the meeting.
Indian River County
Board of
County Commission=
By: -:-John W. Tippin
-
-Chairman--
June 24,1998 1371975r
lug PAGE'?! 3
-16-
t .
PRESS -JOURNAL
Published Daily =
Vero Beach, Indian River County, Florida
COUNTY OF INDIAN RIVER: STATE OF FLORIDA
Before the undersigned authority personally appeared Darryl K. Hicks who on
oath says that he Is President of the Press -Journal, a defy newspaper published at Vero Beach
in Indian Rim County, Florida; that the attached copy of advertisement, being
in the math of -211-L!
In the Court, was pub-
ILshed In said wmWperm the Lsshof 4Q4jK
Afflant further says that the said Press-Jaunal is a newspaper pubb hed at Vero Beach, in
sald Indian River County, Florida, mid that the said newspaper has heretofore been
ORM599=
atter at Ube post ofRce�trh Vertyo Beach, in�said�trhdia�n Fll�var C�acmtyFloride�,bs year next precedlrhg the first pubtfcatbn of the attached copy offRaM ftaUher says hart he las rheiUher � nor prorNsed any persorh, ttrm�,lorebete or refund for Ube purpose of s((er��ajjuirhg tthis
atercreANt.nd subscribed Before me= �D 1g�d_
a° �,Y ANp� °•„
* : MY COM OSSION EXPIRES [live 2
ldNOARY 01.2001 KIME3c'RLY ANN LATS
o CCJC611092 :'� a Notary public, State of Florida
My Commission ExOp. Jan. 01, 2001
Personally Known for Produced ID O
Y J Type of ID Produced
Anyone who needs o special
accommodation for this meeting
must contact the county's Ameri-
cans with' Disabilities (ADA) Coor-
dinator at 567-8000, extemion
223, at least 48 haus in advance
of the meeting.
Indian Rim County.
Board of " ,
County Commissioners
8y: -s -John W. Tipplo,
Chairman
June 24,1998 1371 "4r
JULY 79 1998
-17-
•
FtM-8
CO
NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING
The Board of County Commis-
sioners of Indian River Courcy,
Florida, will consider the adoption
of a county ordinance rezoning
land within the unincorporated
portions of Indian River County.
The subject properly Is owned by
Hale Indian River Groves, Inc. A
public hearing at which parties In
interest and citizens shall have an
opportunity to . be baud, will be
held on Tuesday, July 7, 1998 at
905 - am. In the County Commis-
sion Chamber of die County
Administration Building, located at
1840 25th Street Vero Beach,
Florida. The proposed ordinance to
rezone •tiro abject properties Is
anittled, _
AN ORDINANCE OF INDIAN
RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA,
AMENDING THE ZONING
ORDINANCE AND THE ACCOM-
PANYING ZONING MAP FOR:-
1.
OR:1. +-2.7 ACRES LOCATED ON
THE EAST SIDE OF US 1, +-1.8
MILES NORTH OF CR 510, FROM,
CL, LIMITED COMMERCIAL DIS-
TRICT, TO RM -6, MULTIPLE.
FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT
(UP TO 6 UNITS/ACRE);
2. +-2.7 ACRES LOCATED
+-315 FEET EAST OF US 1 AND
+-1.8 MILES NORTH OF CR 510,
FROM RM -6, MULTIPLE -FAMILY
RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (UP TO 6
UNITS/ACRE), TO CG, GENERAL
COMMERCIAL DISTRICT; AND
3.+-2. 1 ACRES LOCATED ON
THE EAST SIDE OF US 1, +-1.8
MILES NORTH OF CR 510, FROM
CL, LIMITED COMMERCIAL DIS-
TRICT, TO CG, GENERAL COM-
MERCIAL DISTRICT;
AND PROVIDING CODIFICA•
TION, SEVERABILITY, AND
EFFECTIVE DATE
The rezoning application may
be inspected by the public at the
Community Development Depart-
ment located on the second floor of
the County Administration Building
located at 1840 25th Street Vero
Beach, Florida, between the haus
of 8:30 am. and 5:00 pm. an
weekdays. For more Wormation,
contact . John Wachtel at 567-
8000, extmnstan 247.
The proposed ordinance may be
inspected by the public between
8:30 a.m. and 5:10 pm. at the
office of the Clerk to the Board of
County Comenissiorners, ,1840 25th
Street, Vero Beach, Florida.
The Board of County Commis.j
eiorron may adopt another zoning
Flistrid, other than the district
requested, provided that the
adopted zoning district is concis-.
tent with the county's comprehen
ilve pian.
.Anyone who may wish to
appeal any decision which may be
made at this meeting will need to
ensure that o verbatim record of
the proceedings is made, which
Includes the Wimony and evi.
dance upon which On appeal is
based
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of June 24, 1998:
TO: James E. Chandler
County Administrator
EP TMENT HEAD CONCURRENCE
LOU—
Robert M. Keating,
Community Developme tit ctor
THROUGH: Sasan Rohani, AICP � '
Chief, Long -Range Planning
FROM: ' John Wachtel
Senior Planner, Long -Range Planning
DATE: Jane 24,1998
RE: Hale Indian River Groves, Inc., Request to Amend The Comprehensive Plan to
Redesignate f2.7 Acres From C/I to L-2, and to Rezone Those t2.7 Acres From
CL to RM -6; to Amend The Comprehensive Plan to Redesignate 4.7 Acres
From L-2 to CA, and to Rezone Those 4.7 Acres from RM -6 to CG; and to
Rezone t2.1 Acres From CL to CG
PLAN AMENDMENT NUMBER: LUDA 98-05-0149
It is requested that the data herein presented be given formal consideration by the Board of County
Commissioners at its regular meeting of July 7, 1998.
This is a request to redesignate t2.7 acres from C/I, Commercial/Industrial, to L-2, Low -Density
Residential -2 (up to 6 units/acre) while simultaneously redesignating a nearby t2.7 acre tract from
L-2 to C/I. Unlike node expansion requests, the proposed amendment will not increase the amount
of C/I designated land in the county. Rather, this amendment will reconfigure the US 1/CR 510 C/I
node.
The property to be redesignated from C/I to L-2 is the northernmost subject property depicted on
attachments 3 and 4. That property will be referred to as Subject Property 1. In addition to changing
the land use designation of Subject Property 1, the request also involves rezoning Subject Property
1 from the CL, Limited Commercial, District, to RM -6, Multiple -Family Residential District (up to
6 units/acre).
The property to be redesignated from L-2 to C/I is located just south and east of Subject Property
1. That property will be referred to as Subject Property 2. In addition to changing the land use
designation of Subject Property 2, the request involves rezoning Subject Property 2 from RM -6 to
the CG, General Commercial, District.
The southernmost subject property, depicted on attachment 4, will be referred to as Subject Property
3. While no land use designation change is proposed for Subject Property 3, this request does
involve rezoning Subject Property 3 from CL to CG.
All of the subject properties are part of a larger t23 acre tract of land owned by Hale Indian River
Groves, Inc. and located on the east side of US 1,:4.8 miles north of CR 510. The purpose of this
request is to facilitate the expansion of a citrus packinghouse on the ±23 acre tract.
On June 11, 1998, the Planning and Zoning Commission voted 5-0 to recommend that the Board of
County Commissioners approve this request.
Because the packinghouse expansion must be complete before packing season, the applicant has
severe time restrictions. For that reason, the applicant worked with planning staff to identify a faster
comprehensive plan amendment process. After consulting with the Florida Department of
Community Affairs (DCA), staff determined that the proposed amendment qualifies as a "small
scale" amendment.
JULY 79 1998
Section 163.3187(1)(c), FS, sets the following criteria for small scale amendments:
1. The proposed amendment involves 10 or fewer acres;
2. The cumulative effect of the acreage for all small scale amendments in the jurisdiction does
not exceed 80 acres in a calendar year;
3. The proposed amendment does not involve the same property granted a land use designation
change within the prior 12 months;
4. The proposed amendment does not involve the same owner's property within 200 feet of
property granted a land use designation change within the prior 12 months;
5. The proposed amendment does not involve a change to the comprehensive plan's text;
6. The subject property is not within an area of critical state concern; and
7. The proposed amendment does not involve increasing residential density above 10 units/acre.
Small scale plan amendments are deemed to have fewer impacts than typical plan amendments and
are eligible for a streamlined adoption process. In contrast to typical plan amendments which require
review and approval by DCA, local governments may adopt small scale plan amendments without
review or approval by DCA.
In this case, the procedures for reviewing the subject comprehensive plan amendment will be as
follows. First, the Planning and Zoning Commission conducts a public hearing to review the
request. The Commission has the option to recommend approval or denial of the comprehensive
plan amendment request to the Board of County Commissioners. Also, the Planning and Zoning
Commission may recommend approval of or deny the rezoning portion of the request. If the
rezoning request is denied, only the land use amendment request is forwarded to the Board, unless
the denial to rezone is appealed. Following Planning and Zoning Commission action, the Board
takes final action to approve or deny the land use amendment and rezoning requests.
Besides being exempt from DCA review, small scale amendments are also exempt from the state's
statutory limitations on the frequency of adopting comprehensive plan amendments. For example,
although the number of typical plan amendments that a local government may consider is not
limited, the frequency with which local governments can amend their comprehensive plan is
regulated by state law. According to Florida Statutes, typical plan amendments are limited to twice
per calendar year. For that reason, the county accepts typical plan amendment applications only
during the two `window" months of January and July. All requests submitted during each window
month are processed simultaneously. That method ensures that typical plan amendments will be
adopted no more than twice per calendar year.
State law, however, provides several exceptions to the twice per calendar year limitation. One of
those exceptions is for small scale plan amendments. Consequently, a local government may adopt
small scale amendments, such as the subject plan amendment, without regard for the twice per
calendar year limitation. For that reason, the proposed amendment is exempt from the twice per
calendar year adoption limit.
- Subject Property 1
Subject Property 1 consists of citrus groves and is zoned CL. Land abutting Subject Property 1's
north boundary, also zoned CL, contains a recreational vehicle sales business. A motor lodge is
located west of Subject Property 1, across US 1, on CG zoned land. Citrus groves are located on
land bordering the subject property on the south and east. Those groves are zoned CG south of the
subject property and RM -6 east of the subject property.
- Subject Property 2
Subject Property 2 and properties to the north, south and east are zoned RM -6 and consist of citrus
groves. Land abutting Subject Property 2 on the west is zoned CG and contains the Hale Indian
River Groves papkinghouse, an accessory retail store and a citrus grove.
- Subject Property 3
Subject Property 3 and land to the south are zoned CL. The north half of Subject Property 3 consists
of a truck parking lot, while the south half contains an accessory building. The abutting property
to the south of Subject Property 3 contains one building. That building appears to be a single-family
house. West of Subject Property 3, across US 1, land is zoned CG and contains a golf cart business
and a single-family house. North of Subject Property 3, land is zoned CG and contains the Hale
Indian River Groves packinghouse, an accessory retail store and a citrus grove. East of Subject
Property 3, land is zoned RM -6 and consists of citrus groves.
JULY 79 1998
1
,O -Y.
>c��-Li�
-19-
t)
l FAGS � - 1.
Subject Properties 1 and 3, and lands to the north, south and west of those properties are designated
C/I, CommerciaUIndustrial, on the county's future land use map. That designation permits various
commercial and industrial zoning districts. Land to the east of Subject Properties 1 and 3, including
Subject Property 2, is designated L-2, Low -Density Residential -2, on the county's future land use
map. The L-2 designation permits residential uses with densities up to 6 units/acre.
Subject Properties 1 and 2 consist of citrus groves, while Subject Property 3 contains an accessory
building, parking areas, and several oak trees. As such, all three subject properties are disturbed sites
and contain no wetlands or other environmentally important or environmentally sensitive habitat.
The subject properties are within an "AE" 100 year floodplain, with a minimum base flood elevation
requirement of eight feet NGVD.
Water lines extend to the subject sites from the South County Reverse Osmosis Plant, while
wastewater lines extend to the sites from the North Regional Wastewater Treatment Plant.
US 1 provides access to the sites. US 1 is classified as an urban principal arterial roadway on the
future roadway thoroughfare plan map. This segment of US 1 is a four -lane paved road with
approximately 120 feet of existing public road right-of-way. No improvements are currently
programmed for this segment of US 1.
There are many similarities and some differences between the CL and CG zoning districts. The CL
district is intended to serve, and be more compatible with, nearby residential development.
Therefore, in terms of permitted uses, the CL district is slightly more restrictive. In contrast, the CG
district allows somewhat more intense commercial development. The differences between the
districts are best illustrated by their purpose statements. These purpose statements are as follows:
• CL, Limited Commercial District. The CL, limited commercial, district is intended to
provide areas for the development of restricted commercial activities. The CL district is
intended to accommodate the convenience retail and service needs of area residents, while
minimizing the impact of such activities on any nearby residential areas.
• CG, General Commercial District. The CG, general commercial, district is intended to
provide area for the development of general retail sales and selected service activities. The
CG district is not intended to provide for heavy commercial activities, such as commercial
service uses, heavy repair services nor industrial uses.
In this section, an analysis of the reasonableness of the application will be presented. Following a
discussion of plan amendment review standards, this section will include the following:
• an analysis of the proposed amendment's impact on public facilities;
• an analysis of the proposed amendment's compatibility with surrounding areas;
• an analysis of the proposed amendment's consistency with the comprehensive plan; and
• an analysis of the proposed amendment's potential impact on environmental quality.
Unlike most land use designation amendment requests, this request does not involve an increase in
land use intensity. As proposed, the request involves a minor reconfiguration, rather than an
expansion, of the commercial/industrial node.
For this reason, the subject request can be characterized differently from most plan amendments.
Typically, plan amendments involve increases in allowable density or intensity of development. As
such, the typical amendment would result in impacts to public facilities and changes to land use
patterns. Consequently, both the county comprehenffive plan and state policy dictate that a high
standard of review is required for typical plan amendments. This standard of review requires
justification for the proposed change based upon adequate data and analysis.
The subject amendment, however, differs significantly from a typical plan amendment request.
Instead ofproposing density or intensity increases, the subject amendment involves only a locational
shift in future land uses with no overall increase in land use intensity.
JULY 79 1998
-20-
40 ID
Staffs position is that these different types of plan amendments warrant different standards of
review. Since the typical type of amendment can be justified only by challenging the projections,
need assessments, and standards used to prepare the original plan, a high standard of review is
justified. For amendments involving just shifts in land uses and no intensity/density increase, less
justification is necessary. This recognizes that no single land use plan map is correct and that many
variations may conform to accepted land use principles and meet established plan policies.
All of the sites comprising this request are located within the County Urban Service Area, an area
deemed suited for urban scale development. The comprehensive plan establishes standards for:
Transportation, Potable Water, Wastewater, Solid Waste, Stormwater Management, and Recreation.
The adequate provision of these services is necessary to ensure the continued quality of life enjoyed
by the community. To ensure that the minimum acceptable standards for these services and facilities
are maintained, the comprehensive plan requires that new development be reviewed. For land use
designation amendment and rezoning requests, this review is undertaken as part of the conditional
concurrency determination application process.
As per section 910.07(2) of the Concurrency Management Chapter of the County's Land
Development Regulations, projects which do not increase land use density or intensity are exempt
from concurrency requirements. For the subject request, the size of the C/I node will not change,
although the node's shape will be reconfigured. Therefore, this land use amendment and rezoning
request is exempt from concurrency review because the requested land use designation and zoning
changes would not increase the potential land use intensity that the sites could accommodate.
It is important to note that approval of this request will not affect service levels for any public
facility. In this case, a detailed concurrency analysis will be done in conjunction with site
development. That concurrency analysis will address facility service levels and demand.
Compatibility with the surrounding area is not a major concern for this request. Most
incompatibilities occur where commercial/mdustrial land abuts residential land. With respect to the
subject request, two factors work to mitigate potential incompatibilities in those areas.
The first factor relates to county land development regulations. Those regulations require all
commercial/industrial development to go through the site plan review process. That process can
often mitigate potential impacts through setbacks, buffers, and site design. The subject properties,
however, are also subject to other requirements. In addition to normal setback, buffer, and site
design requirements, all new commercial/mdustrial development in this area of the county is subject
to the provisions of the Wabasso Corridor Plan. That plan includes special standards for signs, roofs,
building colors, buffers, and landscaping.
Another factor that works to mitigate potential incompatibilities in this area is potentially more
important. That factor relates to the ownership of land in this area of the county. Most of the land
surrounding the subject properties is owned by the applicant. The exceptions are the CL zoned areas
north of Subject Property 1 and south of Subject Property 3, and the CG zoned areas west of the
subject properties, across US 1. Given the property ownership characteristics of the subject property
and surrounding property, the proposed amendment would not result in any C/I designated land
abutting any residentially designated land not owned by the applicant.
Generally, commercially designated sites that front on major roads may be appropriate for any one
of several different commercial zoning districts, including CL, CG, and CH. In fact, this area of the
county already somewhat reflects that type of mixed zoning. For that reason, both the CL and the
CG zoning districts are appropriate for most land within the US 1/CR 510 commercial/industrial
node. Applying either of those zoning districts to Subject Properties 2 and 3 would result in
development that is compatible with surrounding property.
Land use amendment and rezoning requests are reviewed for consistency with all policies of the
comprehensive plan. As per section 800.07(1) of the land development regulations, the
"comprehensive plan may only be amended in such a way as to preserve the internal consistency of
the plan pursuant to Section 163.3177(2), FS." Amendments must also show consistency with the
overall designation of land uses as depicted on the Future Land Use Map, which includes
agricultural, residential, recreational, conservation, and commercial and industrial land uses and their
densities.
JULY 79 1998
-21- C()J F� �F,
EOOK Fb:GE,q
.�.
The goals, objectives and policies are the most important parts of the comprehensive plan. Policies
are statements in the plan which identify actions which the county will take in order to direct the
community's development. As courses of action committed to by the county, "policies provide the
basis for all county land development related decisions—including plan amendment and rezoning
decisions. While all comprehensive plan objectives and policies are important, some have more
applicability than others in reviewing plan amendment and rezoning requests. Of particular
applicability for this request are the following policies and objectives.
- Future Land Use Element Policy 143
In evaluating a land use amendment request, the most important consideration is Future Land Use
Element Policy 14.3. This policy requires that one of four criteria be met in order to approve a land
use amendment request. These criteria are:
• The proposed amendment will correct a mistake in the approved plan;
• The proposed amendment will correct an oversight in the approved plan;
• The proposed amendment is wan -anted based on a substantial change in circumstances
affecting the subject property; or
• The proposed amendment involves a swap or reconfiguration of land use designations at
separate sites and, that swap or reconfiguration will not increase the overall land use density
or intensity depicted on the Future Land Use Map.
The proposed land use amendment meets the policy's fourth criterion. As specifically cited in the
policy, the proposed amendment involves a swap or reconfiguration of land use designations at
separate sites (Subject Properties 1 and 2), and that swap or reconfiguration will not increase the
overall land use density or intensity depicted on the Future Land Use Map. For those reasons, the
proposed amendment meets the fourth criterion of Future Land Use Element Policy 14.3 and is
consistent with Future Land Use Element Policy 14.3.
- Future Land Use Element Policies 13, 3.2, 33, 3.4, 7.1, and 7.5; Stormwater Management
Sub -Element Policies 1.1 and 1.2; and Capital Improvement Element Policies 33 and 3.5
Each of these policies regulates development in flood prone areas. These policies are relevant
because the subject properties are within an "AE" 100 year floodplain, with a minimum base flood
elevation requirement of eight feet NGVD.
Future Land Use Element Policies 1.3, 3.3, and 3.4 require the county to set standards and
procedures regarding the development of land in flood prone areas, and to incorporate those
standards and procedures into the county's land development regulations. Future Land Use Element
Policy 3.2 specifically states, that regardless of land use designation or zoning district, no
development shall be permitted to exceed established levels of service. Future Land Use Element
Policy 7.1 requires development to be consistent with regulations established by the National Flood
Insurance Program, and Future Land Use Element Policy 7.5 specifically states that stormwater
runoff from new development shall not negatively impact adjacent properties or receiving surface
waterbody quality.
Stormwater Management Sub -Element Policy 1.1 and Capital Improvements Element Policy 3.5 set
the drainage level of service standard for the county. These policies state that for a 25 year/24 hour
storm, post development runoff shall not exceed pre -development runoff unless a maximum
discharge rate has been adopted for the applicable drainage basin and the discharge does not exceed
that rate.
An additional requirement is found in Stormwater Management Sub -Element Policy 1.2 which
requires all new buildings to have the lowest habitable floor elevation no lower than the elevation
of the 100 -year flood elevation as shown on FEMA maps or as defined in a more detailed study.
Finally, Capital Improvements Element Policy 3.3 requires that the infrastructure necessary to meet
the adopted level of service be in place concurrent with the impacts of new development.
All of these policies have been incorporated into the county's land development regulations,
particularly chapter 930, Stormwater Management and Flood Protection. Development of each
subject property must be consistent with each of the referenced plan policies and land development
regulations. For these reasons, development of the subject properties under either the existing or
proposed land use designations and zoning districts would not degrade the floodplain or its storage
capacity. Therefore, the proposed amendment is consistent with these policies.
JULY 79 1998
• -22—
•
- Future Land Use Element Policy 1.11
Future Land Use Element Policy 1.11 states that the Low -Density Residential land use designations
are intended for land that is located within the urban service area and near existing urban centers.
Located within the urban service area, near the City of Sebastian, and near the intersection of US 1
and CR 510, Subject Property 1 meets those criteria. Under the proposed amendment, Subject
Property 1 would have a Low -Density Residential land use designation. For that reason, the request
is consistent with Future Land Use Element Policy 1.11.
- Future Land Use Element Policy 1.15
Future Land Use Element Policy 1.15 states that the Commercial/Industrial land use designation
shall be limited_ to lands that are located within the urban service area and near existing urban
centers. Located within the urban service area, near the City of Sebastian, and near the intersection
of US 1 and CR 510, Subject Property 2 meets those criteria. Under the proposed amendment,
Subject Property 2 would have a CommerciallIndustrial land use designation. For that reason, the
request is consistent with Future Land Use Element Policy 1.15.
- Future Land Use Element Policy 1.20
Future Land Use Element Policy 1.20 states that nodes shall have a designated size based on the
intended use and service area population, existing land use pattern and other demand characteristics.
The amount of C/I designated land is based on service area population, the existing land use pattern,
and other demand characteristics. The proposed amendment will not alter the amount of CR
designated land. Therefore, the proposed amendment is consistent with Future Land Use Element
Policy 1.20.
- Future Land Use Element Policy 1.21
Future Land Use Element Policy 1.21 states that node boundaries should provide for efficient land
uses and maximum use of transportation facilities while eliminating strip development. The
proposed amendment works to eliminate strip development in two ways. First, by changing the land
use designation of Subject Property 1 from CA, Commercial/Industrial, to L-2, Low -Density
Residential -2, the proposed amendment creates a gap in the strip of C/I designated land along the
east side ofUS I. Second, by changing the land use designation of Subject Property 2 from L-2, to
CA, the proposed amendment adds depth to the existing node. For these reasons, the proposed
amendment works to limit strip commercial development along US 1 and is consistent with Future
Land Use Element Policy 1.21.
- Future Land Use Element Policy 1.22
Future Land Use Element Policy 1.22 states that 70% of the land area of a node should be developed
with non-residential and non-agricultural uses before that node is considered for expansion. The
intent of this policy is to regulate increases in the amount of C/I designated land. Since the proposed
amendment does not increase in the amount of C/I designated land in the subject node, Future Land
Use Element Policy 1.22's 70% developed standard does not apply to this amendment.
- Future Land Use Element Policy 17.1
Future Land Use Element Policy 17.1 states that the county shall not approve plan amendments that
increase residential density or land use intensity within the Coastal High Hazard Area (CHHA).
Both Subject Property 1 and Subject Property 2 are within the CHHA. Because both of those
properties are the same size, and they are essentially swapping land use designations, the proposed
amendment would not increase residential density or land use intensity within the CHHA. For that
reason, the proposed amendment is consistent with Future Land Use Element Policy 17.1.
- Economic Development Element Policy 43
Economic Development Element Policy 4.3 states that the county shall evaluate the size and location
of nodes to ensure they can properly provide for growth. Since the proposed amendment
reconfigures the subject node to better provide for growth, the proposed amendment implements
Economic Development Element Policy 4.3.
As part of the staff analysis, all policies in the comprehensive plan were considered. Based upon
this analysis, staff determined that the proposed land use designation amendment is consistent with
the comprehensive plan.
JULY 79 1998
-23-`
r
PLIC,K 1 UPJ PaGE2
The subject properties are disturbed sites. As such, they contain no wetlands, or environmentally
important or environmentally sensitive habitat. County environmental protection regulations,
including tree protection regulations, are the same regardless of land use designation or zoning
district. Therefore, development of the subject properties under the proposed land use designations
and zoning districts would not be anticipated to generate any adverse environmental impacts.
The proposed amendment reconfigures a commercial/industrial node to increase land use efficiency
and facilitate economic development. No increase in the amount of C/I designated land or land use
density/intensity is proposed. The subject request is consistent with the comprehensive plan,
compatible with all surrounding land uses, and will cause no adverse impacts on the environment
or the provision of public services. For these reasons, staff supports the request.
RECOMMENDATION
Based on the analysis, staff and the Planning and Zoning Commission recommend that the Board
of County Commissioners take the following actions:
• approve the attached comprehensive plan amendment ordinance redesignating Subject
Property 1 to L-1, and redesignating Subject Property 2 to C/I;
• approve the attached rezoning ordinance rezoning Subject Property 1 to RM -6, and Subject
Properties 2 and 3 to CG; and
• direct staff to process the subject plan amendment as a small scale amendment.
JULY 79 1998
0
-24—
IY ITS '*• �
CH
�.■a-ae
i
CG _
I
GOV. LOT 6
IM -6
JULY 79 1998
z
N
v
% 7—
V1,10 �
Is
L
log
—25—
Community Development Director Bob Keating reviewed the Memorandum with the
aid of the ELMO. He explained that this Comp Plan amendment is an exception to the twice
a year limitation and is allowed by State law under the "small scale amendment process".
There are 3 parcels to be rezoned to accommodate a packing house expansion. This does not
entail an expansion of the node but does alter the boundaries of the node, with no increase
in intensity of use.
The Chairman opened the public hearing and asked if anyone wished to be heard
regarding this matter. There being none, the Chairman closed the public hearing.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, -
SECONDED by Commissioner Ginn, the Board
unanimously adopted Ordinance 98-017 amending
the Future Land Use Element of the Comprehensive
Plan by changing the Land Use Designation for a
t2.7 acre tract located on the east side of US 11,
approximately 1.8 miles north of CR 510 from C/Ito
L-2; and by changing the Land Use Designation for
a nearby f2.7 acre tract from L-2 to C/I, and
providing severability and effective date (Hale
Indian River Groves, Inc.).
ORDINANCE N0.98-17
AN ORDINANCE OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AMENDING THE FUTURE
LAND USE ELEMENT OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN BY CHANGING THE LAND USE
DESIGNATION FOR A t2.7 ACRE TRACT LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF US 1,
APPROXIMATELY 1.8 MILES NORTH OF CR 510, FROM C/I TO L-2; AND BY CHANGING
THE LAND USE DESIGNATION FOR A NEARBY f2.7 ACRE TRACT, FROM L-2 TO C/I;
AND PROVIDING SEVERABILITY AND EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners adopted the Indian River County
Comprehensive Plan on February 13, 1990, and
WHEREAS, the Local Planning Agency held a public hearing on this comprehensive plan
amendment request on June 11, 1998 after due public notice, and
WHEREAS, the Local Planning Agency voted 5 to 0 to recommend approval of this
comprehensive plan amendment to the Board of County Commissioners, and
WHEREAS, this Comprehensive Plan Amendment meets the criteria established in Chapter
163.3187(1)(c), FS, for "small scale development amendments", and
JULY 79 1998
•
ORDINANCE NO. 98- 17
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County held a
Comprehensive Plan Amendment Adoption Public Hearing on July 11, 1998, after advertising
pursuant to Chapter 163.3187(1)(c), FS and Chapter 125.66(4), FS;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED, by the Board of County Commissioner, of Indian
River County, Florida, that:
SECTION 1. (`omprehencive Plan Amentiment Adoption and Transmittal
The amendment to the Indian River County Comprehensive Plan identified in section 2 is
hereby adopted as a small scale development amendment, and one (1) copy is directed to be
transmitted to the State of Florida Department of Community Affairs and one (1) copy is directed
to be transmitted to the Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council.
SECTION 2. Amendments to the ommeh sivPlan
The land use designation of the following described property situated in Indian River County,
Florida to wit:
A PARCEL OF LAND SITUATED IN A PART OF GOVERNMENT LOTS 5 AND 6,
SECTION 21, AND PART OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 28,
TOWNSHIP 31 SOUTH, RANGE 39 EAST, ALL LYING EAST OF U.S. HIGHWAY NO.
1, INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED BY
METES AND BOUNDS AS FOLLOWS.
COMMENCE AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF GOVERNMENT LOT 5, SECTION
21, TOWNSHIP 31 SOUTH, RANGE 39 EAST, THENCE RUN NORTH 00°28' 32" EAST
A DISTANCE OF 280.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE RUN
NORTH 75°5744" EAST A DISTANCE OF 309.79 FEET TO THE NORTHERLY RIGHT
OF WAY OF S.R. LATERAL DITCH NO. 1; THENCE RUN SOUTH 64°2431" WEST
ALONG SAID RIGHT OF WAY A DISTANCE OF 63.04 FEET; THENCE RUN SOUTH
44003'16" WEST A DISTANCE OF 268.10 FEET TO THE INTERSECTION OF THE
EAST RIGHT OF WAY OF U.S. HIGHWAY NO. 1; THENCE RUN NORTH 2505744"
WEST ALONG SAID RIGHT OF WAY A DISTANCE OF 418.67 FEET; THENCE RUN
NORTH 57000'16" EAST A DISTANCE OF 143.67 FEET TO THE POINT OF
BEGINNING.
SAID PARCEL CONTAINS 115,823 SQUARE FEET OR 2.659 ACRES.
Is changed from C/I, Commercial/Industrial to L-2, Low -Density Residential -2 (up to 6 units/acre)
and the Future Land Use Map is hereby revised accordingly.
Mil
The land use designation of the following described property situated in Indian River County,
Florida to wit:
A PARCEL OF LAND SITUATED IN PART OF GOVERNMENT LOT 5, SECTION 21
AND PART OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 28, TOWNSHIP 31
SOUTH, RANGE 39 EAST, AND BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED BY
METES AND BOUNDS AS FOLLOWS:
COMMENCE AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF GOVERNMENT LOT 5 AND RUN
SOUTH 00°3822" WEST A DISTANCE OF 38.28 FEET TO THE EAST RIGHT OF WAY
OF U.S. HIGHWAY NO. 1; THENCE RUN SOUTH 25°5744" EAST ALONG SAID
EAST RIGHT OF WAY A DISTANCE OF 226.20 FEET TO THE INTERSECTION OF
THE SOUTH RIGHT OF WAY OF S.R. LATERAL DITCH NO. 1; THENCE RUN
NORTH 44003'16" EAST ALONG SAID RIGHT OF WAY A DISTANCE OF 280.99
FEET; THENCE RUN NORTH 64°24'31" EAST A DISTANCE OF 50.93 FEET TO THE
POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUE NORTH 64°2431" EAST A DISTANCE
OF 198.43 FEET; THENCE RUN SOUTH 25057'44" EAST AND PARALLEL TO THE
EAST RIGHT OF WAY OF U.S. HIGHWAY NO. 1 A DISTANCE OF 583.03 FEET;
THENCE RUN SOUTH 64002'16" WEST A DISTANCE OF 198.43 FEET; THENCE RUN
NORTH 2505744" WEST A DISTANCE OF 584.32 FEET TO THE POINT OF
BEGINNING.
SAID PARCEL CONTAINS 115,818 SQUARE FEET OR 2.66 ACRES.
JULY 79 1998
•
-27- CG'JK UFACE
ORDINANCE NO. 98-17
Is changed from L-2, Low -Density Residential -2 (up to 6 units/acre) to CA, Commercial/Industrial,
and the Future Land Use Map is hereby revised accordingly.
SECTION 3. Reveal of Conflicting Provisions
All previous ordinances, resolutions, or motions of the Board of County Commissioners of
Indian River County, Florida which conflict with the provisions of this ordinance are hereby repealed
to the extent of such conflict.
SECTION 4. Severability
It is declared to be the intent of the Board of County Commissioners that if any provision of
this ordinance and therefore, the Indian River County Comprehensive Plan Amendment is for any
reason finally held invalid or unconstitutional by any court of competent jurisdiction, such provision
shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision and such holding shall not affect the
validity of the remaining provisions.
SECTION 5. Rffective Date
Unless challenged, the effective date of this ordinance, and therefore, this plan amendment,
shall be August 7, 1998. If challenged, the effective date of this ordinance, and therefore, this plan
amendment, shall be the date a final order is issued by the Department of Community Affairs or
Administration Commission finding the amendment in compliance with Section 163.3184, Florida
Statutes, whichever occurs earlier.
This ordinance was advertised in the Press-Joumal on the 20 day of June, 1998 for a public
hearing to be held on the 7d' day of July, 1998 at which time it was moved for adoption by
Commissioner Eggert , seconded by Commissioner G i n n , and adopted by the
following vote:
Chairman John W. Tippin Aye
Vice -Chairman Kenneth R. Macht Aye
Commissioner Fran B. Adams Aye
Commissioner Caroline D. Ginn Aye
Commissioner Carolyn K. Eggert A v e
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
ATTEST BY:
0
Acknowledgment by the Department of State of the State of Florida this day of 71998
Acknowledgment from the Department of State received on this day of ,1998, at
A.M./P.M. and filed in the office of the Clerk of the Board of County Commissioners of Indian
River County, Florida.
Intim Rl- Ca I Aofrove0 I Date I
1X1 ?M- :lls I
,. ...
JULY 79 1998
-28-
�C_
•
ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert,
SECONDED by Commissioner Ginn, the Board
unanimously adopted Ordinance 98-018 amending
the Zoning Ordinance and the accompanying Zoning
Map for a f2.7 acre tract located on the east side of
US 1 approximately 1.8 miles north of CR -510 from
CL to RM -6; amending the Zoning Ordinance and
the accompanying Zoning Map for a nearby f2.7
acre tract from RM -6 to CG; and by amending the
Zoning Ordinance and the accompanying Zoning
Map for a nearby f2.1 acre tract from CL to CG; and
described herein, and providing severability and
effective date (Hale Indian River Groves, Inc.).
ORDINANCE NO. 98-18
AN ORDINANCE OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AMENDING THE ZONING
ORDINANCE AND THE ACCOMPANYING ZONING MAP FOR A f2.7 ACRE TRACT,
LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF US 1, APPROXIMATELY 1.8 MILES NORTH OF CR 510,
FROM CL TO RMA AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE AND THE ACCOMPANYING
ZONING MAP FOR A NEARBY f2.7 ACRE TRACT, FROM RM -6 TO CG; AND BY
AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE AND THE ACCOMPANYING ZONING MAP FOR
A NEARBY f2.1 ACRE TRACT, FROM CL TO CG; AND DESCRIBED HEREIN, AND
PROVIDING SEVERABILITY AND EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission, sitting as the local planning agency on
such matters, has held a public hearing and subsequently made a recommendation regarding this
rezoning request; and
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida, did
publish and send its Notice of Intent to rezone the hereinafter described property; and
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners has determined that this rezoning is in
conformance with the Comprehensive Plan of Indian River County; and
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners has held a public hearing pursuant to this
rezoning request, at which parties in interest and citizens were heard;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED, by the Board of County Commissioners of Indian
River County, Florida, that the zoning of the following described property situated in Indian River
County, Florida, to -wit:
A PARCEL OF LAND SITUATED IN A PART OF GOVERNMENT LOTS 5 AND 6,
SECTION 21, AND PART OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 28,
TOWNSHIP 31 SOUTH, RANGE 39 EAST, ALL LYING EAST OF U.S. HIGHWAY NO.
1, INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED BY
METES AND BOUNDS AS FOLLOWS.
JULY 79 1998
-29-
'P. pn-227
ORDINANCE NO. 98-18
COMMENCE AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF GOVERNMENT LOT 5, SECTION
21, TOWNSHIP 31 SOUTH, RANGE 39 EAST, THENCE RUN NORTH 00°28' 32" EAST
A DISTANCE OF 280.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE RUN
NORTH 7505744" EAST A DISTANCE OF 309.79 FEET TO THE NORTHERLY RIGHT
OF WAY OF S.R. LATERAL DITCH NO. 1; THENCE RUN SOUTH 64°24'31" WEST
ALONG SAID RIGHT OF WAY A DISTANCE OF 63.04 FEET; THENCE RUN SOUTH
44003'16" WEST A DISTANCE OF 268.10 FEET TO THE INTERSECTION OF THE
EAST RIGHT OF WAY OF U.S. HIGHWAY NO. 1; THENCE RUN NORTH 25°5744"
WEST ALONG SAID RIGHT OF WAY A DISTANCE OF 418.67 FEET; THENCE RUN
NORTH 57000'16" EAST A DISTANCE OF 143.67 FEET TO THE POINT OF
BEGINNING.
SAID PARCEL CONTAINS 115,823 SQUARE FEET OR 2.659 ACRES.
Be changed from CL to RM -6
0
that the zoning of the following described property situated in Indian River County, Florida,
to -wit:
A PARCEL OF LAND SITUATED IN PART OF GOVERNMENT LOT 5, SECTION 21
AND PART OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 28, TOWNSHIP 31
SOUTH, RANGE 39 EAST, AND BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED BY
METES AND BOUNDS AS FOLLOWS:
COMMENCE AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF GOVERNMENT LOT 5 AND RUN
SOUTH 00°3822" WEST A DISTANCE OF 38.28 FEET TO THE EAST RIGHT OF WAY
OF U.S. HIGHWAY NO. 1; THENCE RUN SOUTH 25°5744" EAST ALONG SAID
EAST RIGHT OF WAY A DISTANCE OF 226.20 FEET TO THE INTERSECTION OF
THE SOUTH RIGHT OF WAY OF S.R. LATERAL DITCH NO. 1; THENCE RUN
NORTH 44°03'16" EAST ALONG SAID RIGHT OF WAY A DISTANCE OF 280.99
FEET; THENCE RUN NORTH 64°2411" EAST A DISTANCE OF 50.93 FEET TO THE
POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUE NORTH 64°24'31" EAST A DISTANCE
OF 198.43 FEET; THENCE RUN SOUTH 2505744" EAST AND PARALLEL TO THE
EAST RIGHT OF WAY OF U.S. HIGHWAY NO. 1 A DISTANCE OF 583.03 FEET;
THENCE RUN SOUTH 64°02'16" WEST A DISTANCE OF 198.43_ FEET; THENCE RUN
NORTH 25057'44" WEST A DISTANCE OF 584.32 FEET TO THE POINT OF
BEGINNING.
SAID PARCEL CONTAINS 115,818 SQUARE FEET OR 2.66 ACRES.
Be changed from RM -6 to CG
ME
that the zoning of the following described property situated in Indian River County, Florida,
to -wit:
A PART OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 28, TOWNSHIP 31 SOUTH,
RANGE 39 EAST INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, LYING EAST OF U.S.
HIGHWAY NO. 1 MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF GOVERNMENT LOT 5,
SECTION 21, TOWNSHIP 31 SOUTH, RANGE 39 EAST, THENCE RUN SOUTH
00038'22" WEST A DISTANCE OF 38.28 FEET TO THE INTERSECTION OF THE
EAST RIGHT OF WAY OF U.S. HIGHWAY NO. 1; THENCE RUN SOUTH 2505744"
EAST ALONG SAID EAST RIGHT OF WAY A DISTANCE OF 576.02 FEET TO THE
POINT OF BEGINNING, THENCE CONTINUE SOUTH 25°5T44" EAST A DISTANCE
OF 304.75 FEET TO THE NORTH RIGHT OF WAY OF S.R. LATERAL DITCH NO. 1-
A; THENCE RUN NORTH 56°14'54" EAST ALONG SAID NORTH RIGHT OF WAY A
DISTANCE OF 317.93 FEET; THENCE RUN NORTH 25°5744" WEST AND
PARALLEL TO THE EAST RIGHT OF WAY OF U.S. HIGHWAY NO. 1 A DISTANCE
OF 261.66 FEET; THENCE RUN SOUTH 64°02116" WEST A DISTANCE OF 315.00
FEET TO SAID EAST RIGHT OF WAY AND POINT OF BEGINNING.
SAID PARCEL CONTAINS 89,209 SQUARE FEET OR 2.048 ACRES.
Be changed from CL to CG.
All with the meaning and intent and as set forth and described in said Land Development
Regulations.
JULY 79 1998
-30-
ORDINANCE NO. 98- 18
Effective Date: The effective date of this ordinance shall be the same as the effective date for the
related comprehensive plan amendment, Ordinance #98- . If the related comprehensive plan
amendment, Ordinance #98-17 is not challenged, the effective date of this rezoning ordinance
shall be August 7, 1998. If the related comprehensive plan amendment, Ordinance #98-17 is
challenged, the effective date of this rezoning ordinance shall be the date a final order is issued by
the Department of Community Affairs or Administration Commission finding the comprehensive
plan amendment in compliance with Section 163.3184, Florida Statutes, whichever occurs earlier.
Approved and adopted by the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County,
Florida, on this 7* day of July,1998.
This ordinance was advertised in the Press-Joumal on the 20 day of June,1998 for a public
hearing to be held on the 7'" day of July, 1998 at which time it was moved for adoption by
Commissioner Eggert , seconded by Commissioner G i nn and adopted by the
following vote:
Chairman John W. Tippin Aye
Vice -Chairman Kenneth R. Macht Ay p
Commissioner Fran B. Adams Ay e
Commissioner Caroline D. Ginn Aye
Commissioner Carolyn K. Eggert Aye
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
':�WATTEST BY: t6 C
JeffreXIC,Badon, Cler
This ordinance was filed with the Department of State on the following date:
u\v\j\lu\hale\rzonord
JULY 79 1998
-31-
001-11 �,
•
-� I
E f17, 0 6 FA G, -
9.B. PUBLIC DISCUSSION ITEM - GLENN LEGWEN -
CHILDREN'S SERVICES NETWORK BUDGETING PROCESS
Glenn Legwen, 5900 5' Street SW, read from his letter of June 15, 1998 with
attachments as follows:
Glenn L.egwen's
Acaddemix Nursery Academy
5900 5th St. SW
Vero Beach, Florida 32%8 �-
(561)778-7791
June 15,1998
Mr. James Chandler & County Commissioners of Indian River County
1840 25th Street
Vero Beach, Florida 32960
Subject: Children Services Network Budgeting process.
Dear Mr. Chandler,
It was quite obvious to those of us in attendance at the County Commission Meeting
June 9th, Chairman John Tippin, did not wish to have anyone speak from the floor on
Mrs. Ginn's request to take a closer look at the Children Services Network. Therefore, I
make the following request �
1
I would ask that you place my name on the jww 23�Agenda under Items for Public
Discussion so that I might ask the members of the BCC the following questions:
o
General Overview (Line 3)
The Children's Service Network Guide ... The CSNetwork will maintain the Guide
and act as an advisory board to the BCC. (Line 9 & 10)
• Indian River County Code 103.04, All advisory boards of commissions shall be
created by resolution instead of ordinance. Was the Children Services Network
created by "resolution," or "ordinance."?
Government -In-The-Sunshine Manual 1997 Edition, Volume 19
Part I; B. What Agencies Are Covered By the Sunshine Law?
1. Are all public agencies subject to the Sunshine Law? The Government -in -the -
Sunshine Law applies ... It is equally applicable to elected and appointed boards or
commissions.
• (Chapter 11; Children Services Network, Lines 27 through 35) How can the
Sheriff, the Superintendent of Schools, the Department of Children & Families'
District Administrator, the Department of Health's County Health Department
Administrator, a Judge living in IRC be appointed by the IRC/BCC under County
Ordinance No. 97-17 and not be subject to the Sunshine Law?
1. Dr. Dearing was not in attendance at the meeting of the Grant Review and
Program Committee of the CSN on June 8, 1998. Mr. Hershberg asked
several questions that could not be answered by any members on the panel.
Commissioner Macht said that he would talk with Dr. Dearing. Did
Commissioner Macht speak to Dr. Dearing outside the confines of the normal
meeting room? If he did, then is this not a violation of the Sunshine Law?
I believe by appointing the two elected officials, the Sheriff and Judge Kanarec to a
"Membership," level in the CSNetwork, the BCC has done them a great injustice. Any
exchange of letters, faxs, computer disketts, etc. they might have between each other is a
potential violation. Regardless of how inocent it might seem, any conversation they
might have between committee members to include Mr. Macht is a potential violation of
the Sunshine Law. In every day conduct of their business these members of our
community must speak with each other. Why make it difficult for them and place them at
risk?
JULY 79 1998
0 -32-
•
In the Definition Portion of the Children Services Network Guide there is no
definition given to "Grant Review and Program Committee." Where does the
public find- out more about this committee?
o What is the purpose of preparing a Children Services Network Guide if we are
going to abrogate its purpose?
1. Chapter III Needs Assessment, Priorities & Planning. Needs Assessment.
Lines 7 through 9, "The needs assessment shall include a comprehensive
county -wide evaluation of children's services to produce a qualitative
summary of existing programs services, activities, asset mapping and
identification of unmet and undermet needs.
Why haven't we done this? Do we have to go outside our local community to hire
Hershberg-Salter Associates to do an evaluation of our unmet or undermet needs?
1. Line 19 through 21, Targeted surveys may be requested periodically if they are
topic -specific and needed to verify a service priority for Indian River County
children. The request should be written and presented to the CSNetwork.
It appears to me that we prepared a "Targeted Survey" (see enclosed Needs
Assessment Phone Survey) before we produced a comprehensive county -wide evaluation
of existing children services. Our eagerness to obtaine, dole out, and spend the $300,000
dollars so generously place on the table by the CSNetwork has caused some of our more
liberal Board of County Commissioners to leap headlong into this profuse morass of
unfunded/underfunded public wellfare.
I think the Board of County Commissioners should listen to Mrs. Ginn and follow
her suggestion as outlined in her Indian River County Memorandum, dated June 4, 1998.
Sincerely yours,
Glenn W. Legwen
ATTACHMENT A
1 UfMODU TION
2
3 GENERAL OVERVIEW
4
5 The Children's Services Network Guide is to be used as the primary document that contains the
6 standards, policies, procedures creating a unified system of planning and delivery within which
7 children's needs can be identified, targeted, addressed and evaluated by the Children's Services
8 Network (CSNetwork). With respect to the Guide, The Board of County Commissioners (BCC)
9 will have the approval authority on its adoption and revisions. The CSNerwork will maintain the
10 Guide and act as an advisory board to the BCC.
11
12 The CSNetwork will also receive and review proposals for allocation of funds for targeted
13 children's services and make recommendations regarding funding to the BCC. County staff will be
14 made av40able at the direction of the county administrator. Although the CSNetwork Guide will
15 be the ptihtaty source for policy and procedural guidance, the Indian River County Comprehensive
16 Plan, as well as the Comprehensive Plans of municipalities in the County, will be used where they
17 contain goals, policies, and objectives relating to children's services.
18
19 The CSNetwork Guide serves as a reference for the CSNetwork throughout the continuing
20 planning process. The main principles contained in the Guide are to:
21
22 1. Recommend to provide and maintain services for children- as the CSNetwork
23 determines are needed for the general well-being of the children in the county.
24
25 2. Collect information and statistical data and conduct research that will be helpful to the
26 CSNetwork and the county in deciding the needs of children in the county.
27
28 3. Consult, collaborate, and coordinate with other agencies dedicated to the well-being of
29 children to end duplication of services .
30
31 4. Recommend the allocation of funds for programs that provided services for the benefit
32 of children in the county.
33
34 5. Recommend standards for measurable outcomes within the request for proposal and
35 monitor the agencies for actual performance on agreed upon standards.
36
JULY 79 1998
-33-
•
37
38 The primary objective of the Guide is to outline procedures to meet these principles. Children
39 should be given the opportunity to grow up as `Healthy Children in a Healthy Community." The
40 term "healthy" encompasses socioeconomic, physical, environmental, educational and behavioral
41 health. Meeting this goal will require the cooperation, collaboration and partnership of both
42 public and private agencies. The secondary objective of the guide is to recommend procedures for
43 the application for and allocation of dollars.
44
I CHAPTER II
2
3 RESPONSIBII.TITES/RELATIONSHIPS
4
5 Officials listed below are responsible for the functions indicated:
6 -
7 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
8
9 1. Approves policies, procedures and priorities based upon recommendations from the
10 CSNetwork.
11
12 2. Approves in writing only those children's programs or agencies proposed by the CSNetwork
13 and may approve or delete any program.
14
15 3. Authorizes all financial measures including grant applications Shared Services Network and the
16 receipt of gifts for carrying out funding of services.
17
18 4. Provides final approval of all CSNetwork recommended contracts and documents.
19
20 5. Approves the annual budget for CSNetwork programs, as well as expenses necessary to staff
21 the Executive Office.
22
23 6. Appoints members to the CSNetwork.
24
25 CUMDREN'S SERVICES NETWORK
26
27 1. Membership shall consist of thirteen (13) members appointed by the Indian River Count BCC,
28 in accordance with the provisions of County Ordinance No. 97-17 as o ows:
29
30 a) County Commissioner.'
31 b) Judge living in Indian River County designated by Chief Judge
32 c) Superintendent of Schools
33 d) Department of Children & Families' District Administrator
34 e) Department of Health's County Health Department Administrator _
35 Wit). Law Enforcement - County Sheriff
36 g) Member from District T —
37 h) Member from District 2 —
38 i) Member from District 3
39 j) Member from District 4 —
40 k) Member from District 5 —
41 1) At -Large Member
42 m) At -Large Member
43 _
44
CHAPTER III
2
3 NEEDS ASSESSMENT, PRIORITIES & PLANNING
4
5 NEEDS ASSESSMENT
6 -
7 The needs assessment shall include a comprehensive county -wide evaluation of children's services
8 to produce a qualitative summary of existing_ programs, services, activities, asset mapping and
9 identification of unmet and undermet needs. A needs assessment shall be done every three (3)
10 years with annual updates. This document may include results of assessments and surveys done by
11 other agencies in Indian River County. The format of the survey shall include all area of services
12 to Indian River County children and will utilize a systematic approach to identify and understand
13 the unmet and undemet needs of children. =
14
15 Asset mapping shall be conducted for the identification of programs, services and activities
16 currently in place in the county. This process identifies the location, number of individuals served
17 and potential waiting lists for unmet needs.
18
JULY 79 1998
-34-
• 0
•
19 Targeted surveys may be requested periodically if they are topic -specific and needed to verify a
20 service priority for Indian River County children. The request should be written and presented to
21 the CSNetwork..If approved, then a survey will be developed and completed. The results of the
22 survey will then be used to verify the need and will be incorporated into the overall vision for
23 future funding recommendations to the BCC.
24
25 PRIORTPIES
26
27 In accordance with the planning timetable, a priority listing will be established based on the results
28 of the needs assessment. This listing may not exclude a program from being recommended for
29 funding, but the CSNetwork and the BCC should consider the priority rating as a guideline in
30 making funding decisions. A Requests For Proposals (RFP) will be initiated based upon the
31 recommended priority listing.
32
33 PLANNWG
34
35 A three (3) year Children's Services Plan shall be developed by March 30 of each year and updated
36 annually within the same time -frame. This plan describes the manner in which the CSNetwork
37 intends to implement and operate all aspects of program administration within its jurisdiction in
38 accordance with Ordinance # 97-17. The recommended Children's Services Plan will be presented
39 to the BCC for approval.
40
41
42
43
44
45
CHO.DREN'S SERVICES NETWORK
OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
Hello, my name is . rm a volunteer with the Children's Services Network of
Indian River County. We are not selling anything or soliciting for money, we only want your opinions.
We are catling residents whose phone numbers have been chosen randomly to get their ideas on _
issues facing children and families In our county. Do you have time now for a few questions which
shouldn't take more than 5-10 minutes? -- --
If no, thank them and terminate the call.
ZIP CODS (Record zip code from telephone directory Usting)
Are you aver the age of 18?
Qf no, may I speak with someone over 18 In the household?) =
L : Do you have children under the age of 18 in the household for wh
_om you are caring? Yes No
^ IL 9 yes, crow many?
111. What do you feel are the biggest problems facing the children growing up In Indian River County?
W. _ _ We welcome your opinion, so rd like to name some areas of oanram and ask you to rate them as a
- -problem' or Ora a problem'. 8 you feel that they are a problem. I will ask that you rank them as
a high priority (needing to be addressed Immediately) or low priority (needing to be addressed In
the future). _
Not a
Mem Problem
JULY 79 1998
1.1 Hunger in children and families
12 Unemployment — Adult
1.3 Availability of Legal Services
1.4 Housing
1.5 Homelessness
1.6 Transportation
-35-
LOW
t1011�, l raJr �-j
Not a
Problem I Problem High Priority I Low Priority
Y.: How long have been a resident of Indian River Courcy? -~ Years
YL Please Indicate which of the Wowing best describes your ape?
18-24 Z5-44 45-64 65t
That's my last question. Everyone's answers -will be combined to give us Information about the
opinions on issues facing children and families in Indian River County. Thank you very much for your
Om and cooperation. _ _
JULY 711998
0
-36—
JULY 79 1998
•
GOVERNMENT -IN -
THE -SUNSHINE
MANUAL
1997 Edition
A Reference For Compliance
with Florida's Public Records
and Open Meetings Laws
Volume 19
w�chuvnhtrrl-hw-IHt-bUNbHINI; MANUAL
PART
GOVERNMENT -IN -THE -SUNSHINE LAW
c
A- WHAT IS THE SCOPE OF THE SUNSHINE LAW?
Florida's Government -in -the -Sunshine -Law, commonly referred to as the Sunshine Law,
provides a tight of access to governmental proceedings at both the state and local levels. The law
is equally applicable to elected and appointed boards and has been applied to any gathering of two
or more members of the same board to discuss some matter which will foreseeably come before
that board for action. Thee are three basic requirements of s. 286.011, F.S.:
(1) meetings of public boards or commissions roust be open to the public:
(2) reasonable notice of such meetings must be given; and
(3) minutes of the meetings must be taken.
The Complete text of the Government in the Sunshine Law and related statutes may be found
in Appendix B.
A right of access to meetings of collegial public bodies is also recognized in the Florida
Constitution. Article I, s. 24, Fla. Const., was approved by the voters in the November 1992
general election and became effective July 1. 1993. Virtually all collegial public bodies are
covered by the open meetings mandate of the open government constitutional amendment with
the exception of the judiciary and the state Legislature which has its own constitutional
ng access. The only exceptions are those established by law or by the Constitution
vision
uThe
Complete text of the amendment may be found in Appendix A of this Manual.
The requiter ants of the Sunshine Law and Art. I, L 24, Fla Const., are discussed in detail
in Part L Please refer to the Table of Contents or the Index for a listing of the specific subjects.
B. WHAT AGENCIES ARE COVERED BY THE SUNSHINE LAW?
1. Are all public ageaies subject to the Sunshine Law?
The Government -in -the -Sunshine Law applies to "any board or cotrunission of any state
agcy or authority or of any agency or authority of any county, municipal corporation, or
political subdivision." The statute thus applies to public collegial bodies within this sate, at the
local as well as state level. City of Mimm Beach v. Gems, 245 So. 2d 38 (Fla. 1971).Itlt i�eoaal�v
applicable to elected and appointed boards or commissions AGO 73-223.
Florida courts have stated tat it was the Legislature's intent to extend application of the
Sunshine Law so as to bind "every board or commission' of the state, or of any county or political
subdivision over which it has dominion and control." Times Publishing Company Y. Williams,
222 So. 2d 470,473 (Fla. 2d DCA 1969), disapproved in parr on other grounds, Neu v Miami
Herald Publishing Company, 462 So. 2d 821 (Fla. 1985). Federal agencies. i.e.. agencies created
under federal law. operating within the state do not come within the purview of the state Sunshine
Law. AGO 71-191. See also. Cincinnati Gas and Electric Company Y. General Electric
many. 854 R2d 900 (6th Cir. 1998) (public has do rix ht of access to negotiations leading to
-37- AGE'
I
settlement of a case in federal court). Cf., Inf. Op. to Barbara A. MarkhamL, September 10, 1996
(technical oversight committee established by state agencies as part of settlement agreement in
federal lawsuit subject to Sunshine law).
Based upon the specific terms of the statute and the 'dominion and control" test approved
by the courM the following are some of the entities which have been found by this office to fall
within the scope of the Sunshine Law:
Regarding the "General Overview", Deputy County Attorney Will Collins noted that
there may be some inherent conflict in the ordinances creating committees and advisory
commissions.
Commissioner Macht noted that all procedures regarding the organization of the
Children's Services Network were approved by Assistant County Attorney O'Brien.
Mr. Legwen then read from the paragraph entitled "Government -In -The -Sunshine"
and noted that he believed it was a great injustice to appoint elected officials to advisory
boards, making them subject to the Sunshine Law. He noted occasions where the Sheriff and
the Chairman of the School Board came together and might possibly discuss some matter -
relating to the Children's Services Network, no matter how minor.
Commissioner Eggert stated that traditionally members of committees do not discuss
matters to come before their committees.
Attorney Collins commented that various public officers, in the performance of their
duties, can certainly talk to each other about their various responsibilities but they do need
to be vigilant when they are on the same boards to not discuss any matter which will
subsequently come before that board. However, there are means of communication which
are open to them, such as a written memorandum with a copy to the press box.
Mr. Legwen believed there could be a problem with subcommittees who may not be
aware of the Sunshine Law and questioned how those members are chosen.
Commissioner Ginn stated that members of the subcommittees are appointed by the
Chairman, and Mr. Legwen thought it would be possible for such a chairman to appoint all
his friends to assure the outcome of a vote.
Commissioner Eggert noted that all committee and subcommittee members are made
aware of the Sunshine Law.
Commissioner Macht also noted that all members of the CSN committee and
subcommittee had specifically read the Sunshine Law and been very comprehensively
briefed by Attorney O'Brien. The Grant Review Committee meets weekly on their own time
to go through some very exhaustive procedures. Mr. Polackwich is the Committee
Chairman, with many demands on his time as an attorney with a young family, but he feels
the importance of this mission. He spends 2 to 3 hours a week on the CSN. Other members
of the committee have young children and yet devote much of their time to these matters.
Kip Jacoby, one of the finest young men you will ever know, just established a new
JULY 79 1998
-38-
accounting fun, but donates his time and services at no charge to the Committee. The
Committee has spent hour after hour attempting to implement the Guide; however, it is
probably not within the power of the Committee to fully implement it. More and more it
becomes apparent that the needs of children are so deep and so far beyond what was
imagined, that it will take years to implement. All the Committee can do is try to be
constructive and gather the information little -by -little.
Commissioner Ginn believed more care should be taken to conform to the Sunshine
Law and commented that members have been added to the committees and subcommittees
without approval by the Board. She is presently working on a memorandum regarding her
concerns and believed there are serious problems which should be addressed.
Mr. Legwen then read from a letter of March 24, 1998 from Alan S. Polackwich:
CLEM, POLACKWICH & VOCELLE
ATMRNEYS AT LAW
A PARTNER8HIP jNCLUDING
PROFEssioNAL ABsocIATIONS:
CHESTER CLEM. P.A.*
ALAN 3 POLACRWICH, SR. P.A.
Louis R VocELLE. JR, P.A."I
PAUL L BERG
JANET C ARNOLDA
ROBERT GOLDEN
OF Cowan
•B"n Ccumm CIVIL UAL LAwvEI
"Baso CERinED Busuass Lmasnox LAWMR
ICEWnrm CWM MEDIA"I
'Al Amur D in MEAN/
Mr. Gene Waddell
8155 - 25th Street
Vero Beach, FL 32966
Surm 501
I1imm BUILDING
2770 INDIAN RLvER BouLEvA=
VERO BEACH. FLORIDA 92960-4278
TELEPHONE (561) 662.8111
FAX (661) 662.2870
http:1/W W W.RuneLnet/ft1z v
E•MAD. cpnesunet net
March 24, 1998
,5 (,,'7- L4 001
B&zvAEo Couwn 0mcE
.904 EASE STRAWBEmGE Aw.NOE
MELEODUNE. FLORIDA $2901
TEI.BPRoNE (407) 725.3303
PLEASE REPLv To
VERo BEACH
RE: Children's Services Network - Grant Review C-4 ttee
Dear Mr. Waddell:
I am writing this letter in my capacity as chairman of the Grant Review
Committee for the Children's Services Network.
The Committee is about to embark on its first review of grant applica-
tions. Currently there are seven members on the Committee, each of whom
is also a member of the Children's Services Network. The Committee has
decided that it will be more effective in its task if it has additional
members, representing additional viewpoints and backgrounds.
For that reason, I am writing to invite you to serve on the Grant Review
Committee as it reviews this first round of applications. It is antici-
pated that the Committee will meet and review applications during the
ninety (90) day period from approximately April 1 through June 30. The
specific meeting dates have not yet been selected.
If you are interested, please let me know in writing at your earliest
convenience. I believe your selection will have to be confirmed by the
Board of County Commissioners, but do not anticipate any problem in that
regard.
I will wait to hear from you.
Very truly yours, RECEIVED
JUL 0 7 1998
CCLERK TOTHE BOARD
Alan S. Polackwich, Sr.
JULY 79 1998
-3 9- 4'j D
"'371 rJB 1
0 FAG-�=
Mr. Legwen questioned why the evaluations could not be done in-house and
expressed his concern that if the County announces it has $300,000 to disburse this year;
they will be inundated with requests and need to come up with $600,000 next year and
$900,000 the next year.
Chairman Tippin observed that a workshop would be helpful but felt the Network
fulfills a purpose and that this is a better way to distribute the funds than to have the
organizations appear before the Board and feel that those who can make a more polished
presentation have a better chance of obtaining funding.
Commissioner Macht noted that the County could imitate some of its sister counties
and have a referendum, creating an independent board with authority beyond that of the
committees; in effect, another taxing district. He felt the Committee is doing the best it can
and suggested that those with doubts might meet with representatives of the United Way and
see how they are struggling with limited funds. We all like to think of this as an upscale
community but there is a lot of grief in this area and we need to build an organization to
oversee these needs. When you look at 3 different organizations, it may appear that their
services overlap but there are large groups of persons needing the services and each can only
cover a small portion of the need.
Chairman Tippin suggested that a workshop be set up when County Attorney Vitunac
returned from vacation.
Mr. Legwen pointed out that he has been involved with Children's Services Network
since its inception and believes it is a wonderful concept.
CONSENSUS was reached that the County Attorneys will set up a workshop and
report back to the Board.
9.C. PUBLIC NOTICE ITEMS
9.C1. ROBERT COOK- REQUEST FOR SPECIAL EXCEPTION USE
APPROVAL FOR AGRICULTURAL BUSINESS TO BE LOCATED ON
THE NORTH SIDE OF 26T f STREET, APPROXIMATEL Y 1/4 MILE
WEST OF 74wAVENUE
9. C.2. SPA LLONE/ARCHIE CARR LAAO SITE - REQUEST TO APPROVE
PURCHASE
JULY 79 1998
0
-40-
The Chairman read a Memorandum of June 30, 1998:
TO: James E. Chandler
County Administrator
D ON HEAD CONCURRENCE:
`Robert M. Keating, AIC
Community Development D' r
4.6 -
FROM: Stan Boling, AICP
Planning Director
DATE: June 30, 1998
SUBJECT: Notice of Scheduled Public Hearings
It is requested that the data herein presented be given formal consideration by the Board of County
Commissioners at its regular meeting of July 7, 1998.
Please be advised that the following public hearings have been scheduled for Board consideration
at its July 14, 1998 meeting: -
1. Request by Robert Cook for special exception use approval for an agricultural business to
be located on the north side of 26th Street, approximately 1/4 mile west of 74' Avenue.
2. Request to approve purchase of the Spallone/Archie Carr LAAC site.
The above referenced public hearing dates are provided for the Board of County Commissioners
information. No action is needed.
No action required or taken.
JULY 79 1998
4� j
CIO ;Ir Gr "
11.A. SEBASTIAN AREA -WIDE SCRUB JAY HABITAT
CONSERVATION PLAN (HCP) - CONTRACT FOR
DEVELOPMENT WITH SMITH ENVIRONMENTAL
SERVICES, INC.
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of June 30, 1998:
TO: James E. Chandler
County Administrator
PA TMENT HEAD CONCURRENCE:
Robert M. Keating, AICP
Community Development F�for
FROM: Roland M. DeBlois; �IICP
Chief, Environmental Planning
DATE: June 30, 1998
SUBJECT: Board Approval of Contract with Smith Environmental Services, Inc.,
for Development of a Sebastian Area -Wide Scrub Jay Habitat
Conservation Plan (HCP)
It is requested that the information herein presented be given formal consideration by the Board of
County Commissioners at its regular meeting of July 7, 1998.
DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS
The Board of County Commissioners, at its meeting of December 9, 1997, authorized staff to
develop a scope of services and issue a Request for Proposals (RFP) for professional services
relating to development of a Sebastian area -wide scrub jay habitat conservation plan (HCP). The
purpose of the proposed HCP is to obtain an "incidental take" permit from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service (FWS) to release for development ±450 privately owned platted scrub lots in Sebastian
Highlands Subdivision, using publicly owned scrub land for mitigation credit to offset the
development impacts of the platted scrub lots.
In February, county staff issued an RFP, and subsequently an appointed selection committee chose
Smith Environmental Services, Inc. (SES) as the top-ranked firm out of 11 proposals. On June 9,
1998, the Board of County Commissioners approved the selection committee's ranking, and
authorized staff to negotiate a contract with SES.
Staff has since negotiated a contract with Smith Environmental Services. The proposed contract (see
attached) is hereby presented for the Board's approval.
ANALYSIS
Attachment A ("Scope of Services") of the contract reflects the scope of work outlined in the
County's RFP. The proposed contract commits the consultant to complete the project in 6 months,
at an overall cost of $24,440 (376 work hours at $65 per hour). As presented earlier to the Board,
the County funding source for the project will be county environmental land bond monies, for which
the expenditure qualifies according to bond counsel.
In previous presentations to the Board, county staff estimated that the HCP would cost approximately
$20,000. However, during the course of the consultant selection process, it became apparent to staff
that the estimate was low, in that consultants' estima[es of work hours needed for the project were
as high as 1,972 hours. In negotiating the contract with SES, staff coordinated with SES and the U.S.
Fish and Wildlife Service to pair down consultant work hour needs, by means of county and FWS
staff collecting available data and providing such things as aerial maps. Staffs position is that the
negotiated contract with SES is "lean," and that the cost of $24,440 is appropriate given the scope
of work.
JULY 79 1998
. -42-
•
I
•
•
Concerning liability insurance, the consultant is exempt nom requirements under the State of
Florida Worker's Compensation laws. The County Risk Manager and attorney staff have reviewed
the contract, and have indicated that hold harmless language in the contract (Section 10 of
Attachment B) sufficiently addresses liability.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners approve the attached contract between
Indian River County and Smith Environmental Services, Inc., for development of a Sebastian area -
wide scrub -jay habitat conservation plan, and that the Board authorize staff to issue a Notice to
Proceed to SES upon execution of the contract by the Board Chairman.
MOTION was made by Commissioner Eggert,
SECONDED by Commissioner Ginn, that the Board
approve the contract with Smith Environmental
Services, Inc. for development of a Sebastian area -
wide scrub jay habitat conservation plan, and
authorize staff to issue a Notice to Proceed to Smith
Environmental Services upon execution of the
contract by the Board Chairman, as recommended by
staff.
Under discussion, Commissioner Adams stated her concern that some of the lots
would still fall within the designated habitat area and the owners would still be unable to
develop them.
Chief of Environmental Planning Roland DeBlois stated that Fish & Wildlife Service
was involved in the selection process and has indicated they would give us as much latitude
,0
as possible. The properties appear to be sufficient for mitigation.
Commissioner Adams wanted to know that, when this plan is finished, these lots will
be free for development, and Community Development Director Bob Keating responded in
the affirmative. It is the intent of Fish & Wildlife Service that the property will meet the
mitigation ratios and, once the plan is implemented, those lots will be free to be developed.
JULY 79 1998
THE CHAIRMAN CALLED THE QUESTION and
the Motion passed unanimously.
DOCUMENTS ARE ON FILE IN THE
OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
-43-„�' U'
11.E. 1998-99 BUDGET HEARING DATES RESCHEDULED
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of July 7, 1998:
TO: Members of the Board
of County Commissioners
DATE: July 7, 1998
SUBJECT: 1998/99 BUDGET HEARING SCHEDULE _
FROM: Joseph A Baird
OMB Director
On March 17, 1998 the Board of County Commissioners approved the 1998/99 budget workshop
and hearing dates. Staff recently learned of a conflict with the School Board concerning the first
budget hearing date of September 8, 1998 at 5:01. The School Board has scheduled their final
budget hearing for this same date.
Staff would like permission from the Board of County Commissioners to change the date of the first
budget hearing from Tuesday, September 8, 1998 at 5:01 p.m. to Wednesday,. September 9, 1998 at
5:01 P.M.
After discussion, CONSENSUS was reached to hold the first Budget Hearing on
September 16, 1998 at 5:01 p.m. and the final Budget Hearing on September 24, 1998 at 5:01
p.m.
JULY 79 1998
-44-
•
11.G. REPLACEMENT VEHICLE FOR ENGINEERING
DIVISION OF PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT - VERO
LINCOLN -MERCURY - 1998 JEEP CHEROKEE
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of June 24, 1998:
TO:
James Chandler
County Administrator 1
THROUGH:
James W. Davis, P. I
Public Works Director J
FROM:
/
Roger D. Cain, P.E. �✓
County Engineer '
SUBJECT:
Purchase of Replacement Vehicle for Engineering Division
DATE:
June 24, 1998
DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS
Due to an accident, which was not the responsibility of a county employee, the Engineering Division
needs to replace the vehicle damaged due to the age, condition and expense of repairing it.
Ordinarily, the purchase could be made from the state contract for vehicles from which local
governments may purchase without the formality of bids or quotes. Unfortunately the current state
contract for vehidles has_expired and no purchase can be made from it. The Engineering Division
needs the vehicle immediately as the existing vehicle is not usable. Staff was able to get a suitable
vehicle (a new Jeep Cherokee, 2WD, 4Door) quoted for $18,256 from Vero Lincoln Mercury Jeep
Eagle. This compares favorably with the state contract for similarly equipped Jeep Cherokees of
$18,400. Staff contacted several local dealers and other state contract dealer suppliers and this was
the best quote of any received. Rather than go through the lengthy process of soliciting bids for one
vehicle, staff believes soliciting quotes has provided an economic alternative for this emergency.
ALTERNATIVES AND ANALYSIS
Alternative 1:
Approve the purchase of the Jeep Cherokee from Vero Lincoln Mercury Jeep Eagle in the amount
of $18,256.
Alternative 2:
Do not approve the purchase of the vehicle from Vero Lincoln Mercury Jeep Eagle.
RECOMMENDATION AND FUNDING
Staff recommends Alternative 1, funding to be from account number 111-244-541-066.42
JULY 79 1998
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams,
SECONDED by Commissioner Ginn, the Board
unanimously approved the purchase of the Jeep
Cherokee from Vero Lincoln Mercury Jeep Eagle in
the amount of $18,256, as recommended by staff.
-45- E �, p. FGi ,44
Fr-
1ell r 1 l",
�� FA �,..li3
H.H. RESOLUTION 98-70 - FINAL ASSESSMENT - WEST
MEADOWS WATER SERVICES - 45TH AVENUE AND
45TH COURT - NORTH OF 41H STREET
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of June 10, 1998:
DATE: JUNE 10, 1998
TO: JAMES E. CHANDLER
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
FROM: DONALD R. HUBBS, P.
DIRECTOR OF UTILITY
PREPARED JAMES D. CHAi!L�I`I`Y
AND STAFFED MANAGER OF PROJECTS
BY: DEPARTMENT SERVICES
SUBJECT: WEST MEADOWS WATER SERVICE
45TH AVENUE AND 45= COURT, NORTH OF 4= STREET
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY PROJECT NO. UW -97 -05 -DS
RESOLUTION IV - FINAL ASSESSMENT
On September 2, 1997, the Indian River County Board of County
Commissioners approved Resolution 111, (97-89), for the preliminary
assessment roll on the above -referenced project. Construction of the project
has been completed. Customer connections have begun, and we request the
Board of County Commissioners' approval of the final assessment roll. (See
attached minutes and Resolution III.)
ANALYSIS
The preliminary assessment was for a total estimated cost to be assessed of
$76,000.00, which equated to $0.119693 per square foot of property owned.
The final assessment (see attached Resolution IV and the accompanying
assessment roll) is in the amount of $61,452.16, which equates to a cost of
$0.093325 (rounded) per square foot of property. This is a project cost and
assessment reduction of 19.14%.
RECOMMENDATION
The staff of the Department of Utility Services recommends that the Board of
County Commissioners approve the adoption of Resolution IV.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert,
SECONDED by Commissioner Ginn, the Board
unanimously adopted Resolution 98-070 certifying
"as -built" costs for installation of water service to
West Meadows Subdivision and such other
construction necessitated by such project; providing
for formal completion date, and date for payment
without penalty and interest.
JULY 79 1998
•
As &M (Phial Rio.) SI98(=MWsbuM)Vk1bC
*Adding one parcel to assessment roll
RESOLUTION NO. 98- 70
A RESOLUTION OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA,
CERTIFYING "AS -BUILT' COSTS FOR INSTALLATION OF
WATER SERVICE TO WEST MEADOWS SUBDIVISION AND
SUCH OTHER CONSTRUCTION NECESSITATED BY SUCH
PROJECT; PROVIDING FOR FORMAL COMPLETION DATE,
AND DATE FOR PAYMENT WITHOUT PENALTY AND
INTEREST.
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County determined that
water improvements for properties located within the area of West Meadows Subdivision
(45th Avenue and 45th Court north of 4th Street) are necessary to promote the public
welfare of the county; and
WHEREAS, on Tuesday, September Z 1997, the Board held a public hearing at which
time and place the owners of property to be assessed appeared before the Board to be heard
as to the propriety and advisability of making such improvements; and
WHEREAS, after such public hearing was held the County Commission adopted
Resolution No. 97-89, which confirmed the special assessment cost of the project to the
property specially benefited by the project in the amounts listed in the attachment to that
resolution; and
WHEREAS, the Director of Utility Services has certified the actual "as -built' cost now
that the project has been completed is less than In confirming Resolution No. 97-89,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, as follows:
1. Resolution No. 97-89 is modified as follows: The completion date for the referenced
project and the last day that payment may be made avoiding interest and penalty charges is
ninety days after passage of this resolution.
2. Payments bearing interest at the rate of 8.5% per annum may be made in ten annual
installments, the first to be made twelve months from the due date. The due date is ninety
days after the passage of this resolution.
3. The final assessment roll for the project listed in Resolution No. 97-89 shall be as shown
on the attached Exhibit "A° and shall also include one additional parcel to be added on a
voluntary basis, i.e., #16-33-39-000040000.00001.0 which Is owned by Michael L. and
Janine A. McCall, as shown on Exhibit "B" attached.
4. The assessments, as shown on the attached, shall stand confirmed, and will remain legal,
valid, and binding first liens against the property against which such assessments are made
until paid.
5. The assessments shown on Exhibit "A," attached to Resolution No. 97-89, were recorded
by the County on the public records of Indian River County, and the lien shall remain prima
facie evidence of its validity. The assessment shown on Exhibit "B" shall be recorded on the
public records of Indian River County, and this lien shall remain prima facie evidence of a
binding first lien against the property shown.
The resolution was moved for adoption by Commissioner Eggert and the motion
was seconded by Commissioner G i nn , and, upon being put to a vote, the vote was as
follows:
Chairman John W. Tippin
Aye
Vice Chairman Kenneth R. Macht
Aye
Commissioner Fran B. Adams
Aye
Commissioner Carolyn K. Eggert
Aye
Commissioner Caroline D. Ginn
Aye
JULY 79 1998
•
-47- fnr OU PAGE�4q
Er,'K, 100 pnr. s,r'�tel
RESOLUTION 98-70
The Chairman thereupon declared the resolution duly passed and adopted this 7 day
of July, 1998.
Attest: J. K. Barton, CI
Deputy Clerk
Attachment: ASSESSMENT ROLL
J. D. C.
JUNE 10 , 1998
WMDOWS 1.WK4
JULY 79 1998
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIQA
Bye
John W. i n
Chairman
(8rt G I Ai`rOwO
6U��Ud1
Gevl
FisK wt�.
FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY PROJECT NO. UW- 97 - 05 - DS
WEST MEADOWS SUBDIVISION WATER SERVICE
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
JEXHIBIT "A"
i 48
•
- ----- ------
PARCEL # 16 33 39 00004 0000 00001.0 SQ. FT.
23,517 ASSESSMENT 2,194.72
OWNER MCCALL, MICHAEL L & JANINE A
PO BOX 650363
VERO BEACH. FL 32965-0363
LEGAL WEST MEADOWS SUB PBI 10.82 LOT 1
..............
PARCEL # 16 33 39 00004 0000 00002.0 SO. FT.
23,517 ASSESSMENT 2,194.72
OWNER PERKINS, RICHARD E
440 45TH AV
VERO BEACH. FL 32962-1841
LEGAL WEST MEADOWS SUB PBI 10-82 LOT 2
PARCEL # 16 33 39 00004 0000 00003.0 SQ. FT.
23,517 ASSESSMENT 2~ 1~ 94 72
OWNER LOVE, F E & DOROTHY E
470 45 TH AV
VERO BEACH. FL 32968-1841
LEGAL WEST MEADOWS SUB PBI 10.82 LOT 3
PARCEL # 16 33 39 00004 0000 00004.0 SO. FT.
23,517 ASSESSMENT 2,194.72
OWNER GRIFFETH , MARC A & JOYCE V
490 45 TH AV
VERO BEACH, FL 32968-1841
WEST MEADOWS SUB PBI 1082 LOT 4
PARCEL # 16 33 39 00(X04 0000 00005.0 SO. FT.
23,517 ASSESSMENT 2,194.72
OWNER KONDZIOLA , MICHAEL & MARY E
510 45 TH AV
VERO BEACH, FL 32968-1855
WEST MEADOWS SUB PBI 10.82 LOT 5
PARCEL # 16 33 39 00004 0000 00006.0 SO. FT.
23,517 ASSESSMENT 2,194.72
OWNER SELPH , JESSE & CHARLOTTE K
550 45 TH AV
VERO BEACH, FL 32968-1855
WEST MEADOWS SUB PBI 10-82 LOT 6
PARCEL # 16 33 39 00004 0000 00007.0 SO. FT.
23,517 ASSESSMENT 2,194.72
OWNER LUTHER. HELEN
590 45 TH AV
VERO BEACH, FL 32966-1855
WEST MEADOWS SUB PBI 10-82 LOT 7
PARCEL # 16 33 39 00004 0000 00008.0 SO. FT.
23,517 ASSESSMENT Z194.72
OWNER WALLACE, KYLE D & SUSAN VANN
595 45 TH AV
VERO BEACH, FL 32968-1842
WEST MEADOWS SUB PBI 10-82 LOT 8
PARCEL # 16 33 39 00004 0000 00009.0 SO. FT.
..............
23,517 ASSESSMENT 2,194.72
OWNER RAGSDALE , DENNIS S. & LA TRELLE
115 22 ND AVE
VERO BEACH. FL 32962
WEST MEADOWS SUB PBI 10.82 LOT 9
PARCEL # 16 33 39 00004 0000 00010.0 SO. FT.
23,517 ASSESSMENT 2,194.72
OWNER DEMPSEY , DANIEL & RANDI
6910 33 RD ST
VERO BEACH. FL 329601406
WEST MEADOWS SUB PBI 10-82 LOT 10
PARCEL # 16 33 39 00004 0000 00011.0 SO. FT.
23,517 ASSESSMENT 2,194.72
OWNER MARSHBANKS , ROBERT A & SUE
215 22 ND AV
VERO BEACH. FL 32960-2658
WEST MEADOWS SUB PBI 10-82 LOT 11
PARCEL # 16 33 39 00004 0000 00012.0 SO. FT. 23,517 ASSESSMENT 2,194.72
OWNER BARKETT , GEOFFREY K
& ALLISON M.
475 45 TH AV
VERO BEACH, FL 32968-1842
WEST MEADOWS SUB PBI 10-82 LOT 12
PARCEL # 16 33 39 00004 0000 00013.0 SO. FT. 23,517 ASSESSMENT 2� 1 72
OWNER BORNE. LAWRENCE J. III & ELIZABETH
385 11 TH PL S W
VERO BEACH, FL 32962
LEGAL WEST MEADOWS SUB PBI 10-82 LOT 13
..............
PARCEL # 16 33 39 00004 0000 00014.0 SO. FT
OWNER FERSCH , HARRY W III & HARRIETT
415 45 TH AV
VERO BEACH, FL 32968-1842
LEGAL WEST MEADOWS SUB PBI 10-82 LOT 14
JULY 79 1998
23,517 ASSESSMENT 2,194.72
t,G�K Ut) FAGS X40
PARCEL 9 16 33 39 00004 0000 00017.0 SO. FT.
EO i`fit 7 1
PARCEL # 16 33 39 00004 0000 00015.0 SO. FT.
23,517 ASSESSMENT 2,194.72
OWNER JOHNSON, JERRY D & CONNIE K
410 45 TH CT
VERO BEACH, FL 32968-1843
LEGAL WEST MEADOWS SUB PBI 10-82 LOT 15
23,517 ASSESSMENT 2,194.72
PARCEL # 16 33 39 00004 0000 00016.0 SO. FT.
23,517 ASSESSMENT 2,194.72
OWNER MACWILLIAM , ROBERT & BARBARA
440 45 TH CT
VERO BEACH, FL 32968-1843
LEGAL WEST MEADOWS SUB PBI 10-82 LOT 16
23,517 ASSESSMENT 2,194.72
PARCEL 9 16 33 39 00004 0000 00017.0 SO. FT.
23.517 ASSESSMENT 2,194.72
OWNER WRIGHT, EDWIN G& FREDA R
5300 HWAY A 1 A # 207
VERO BEACH, FL 32963-1018
LEGAL WEST MEADOWS SUB PBI 10.82 LOT 17
PARCEL # 16 33 39 00004 0000 00018.0 S0. FT.
23,517 ASSESSMENT 2,194.72
OWNER CLOUGHLEY , JAMES E& KIM M
490 45 TH CT
VERO BEACH. FL 32968-1843
LEGAL WEST MEADOWS SUB PBI 1082 LOT 18
PARCEL # 16 33 39 00004 0000 00019.0 SO. FT.
23,517 ASSESSMENT 2,194.72
OWNER SCHWEY , PAUL H & BRONWYN
510 45 TH CT
VERO BEACH, FL 32N8-1858
LEGAL WEST MEADOWS SUB PBI 10-82 LOT 19
lIrNMNMMM
PARCEL # 16 33 39 00004 0000 00020.0 SO. FT.
23,517 ASSESSMENT 2,194.72
OWNER WRIGHT, EDWIN G & FREDA R
5300 HWAY A 1 A # 207
VERO BEACH, FL 32963-1018
LEGAL WEST MEADOWS SUB PBI 1082 LOT 20
PARCEL 9 16 33 39 00004 0000 00021.0 SO. FT. 23,517 ASSESSMENT 2,194.72
OWNER ROBERTS, CHARLES E III & BONNIE
590 45 TH CT
VERO BEACH, FL 32968-1856
LEGAL WEST MEADOWS SUB PBI 10-82 LOT 21
PARCEL 9 16 33 39 00004 0000 00022.0 80. FT. 23,517 ASSESSMENT 2,194.72
OWNER MOORHOUSE , GARY R & JUDITH A
595 45 TH CT
VERO BEACH, FL 32966-1857
LEGAL WEST MEADOWS SUB PBI 10-82 LOT 22
PARCEL # 16 33 39 00004 0000 00023.0 S0. FT. 23,517 ASSESSMENT 2,194.72
OWNER MONTUORO , VINCENT J JR
& EVANTHIA K
555.45 TH CT
VERO BEACH. FL 32968-1857
LEGAL WEST MEADOWS SUB PBI 10412 LOT 23
PARCEL # 16 33 39 00004 0000 00024.0 S0. FT. 23,517 ASSESSMENT 2,194.72
OWNER JEFFERSON, RICHARD F
& ELIZABETH A
185 16 TH AV
VERO BEACH, FL 32968-2708
LEGAL WEST MEADOWS SUB PBI 10-82 LOT 24
0.0 *so- bosses
PARCEL # 16 33 39 00004 0000 00025.0 80. FT. 23,517 ASSESSMENT 2,194.72
OWNER GATES, JOHN K & LAURA C
495 45 TH CT
VERO BEACH. FL 32968-1844
LEGAL WEST MEADOWS SUB PBI 10.82 LOT 25
PARCEL # 16 33 39 00004 0000 00026.0 SO. FT. 23,517 ASSESSMENT 2,194.72
OWNER ZWERNER , JOSHUA E & LINDA S
475 45 TH CT
VERO BEACH. FL 32968-1844
LEGAL WEST MEADOWS SUB PBI 10.82 LOT 26
..............
PARCEL 9 16 33 39 00004 0000 00027.0 SO. FT. 23,517 ASSESSMENT 2,194.72
OWNER COLLINS, JOHN CLAYTON
& SARA JENAE
445 45 TH CT
VERO BEACH, FL 32968-1844
LEGAL WEST MEADOWS SUB PBI 10-82 LOT 27
JULY 79 1998
-50-
PARCEL # 16 33 39 00004 0000 00028.0 SQ. FT. 23,517 ASSESSMENT 2,194.72
OWNER STEWART , JOHN N & PAMELA G
415 45 TH CT
VERO BEACH. FL 32968-1844
LEGAL WEST MEADOWS SUB PBI 10.82 LOT 28 ............«
TOTAL SQUARE FOOTAGE 658,476
TOTAL COST TO BE ASSESSED
COST PER SQUARE FOOT $0.09332496552
ROUNDED TO $0.093325
JUNE, 101998
JOC
WMDOWS3.WK4
TO: INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
DEPARTMENT OF UTILITY SERVICES
1840 25TH STREET
_VERO BEACH, FLORIDA 32960
SUBJECT: WEST MEADOWS SUBDIVISION WATER SERVICE
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY PROJECT NO. UW -97-05-D9
I/we want to be included in the above water assessment project.
Parcel No.
16 33 39 00004 000n nnnm n
Name of Owners Michael L. McCall
Property Address
JULY 79 1998
Janine A. McCall
410 45d Avenue
Vero Beach, Florida 32969
$61,452.16
EA
-51- C.') -r -U 13 F,1GE �4
12. RESOLUTION 98-71- APPOINTING 1998 VALUE
ADJUSTMENT BOARD (VAB) MEMBERS AND PROVIDING
FOR PER DIEM COMPENSATION
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of June 23, 1998:
TO: The Board of County Commissioners
FROM: tom— William G. Collins II - Deputy County Attorney
DATE: June 23, 1998
SUBJECT: Resolution Appointing Value Adjustment Board Members and _
Providing for Per Diem Compensation for Value Adjustment Board
Members
Pursuant to Chapter 194, Florida Statutes, the Board is advised to:
1. Appoint by Resolution three members of the Board to serve on the Value
Adjustment Board for 1998, with the two remaining members designated
as alternates.
2. Provide by resolution for per diem compensation to the Value Adjustment
Board members. The amount of such compensation is established by
statute if both the County Commission and School Board elect to allow
such compensation. The School Board has made such an election. Two-
fifths of the expenses are borne by the School Board and three-fifths by
the County Commission. An appropriate resolution is attached for your
approval.
RECOMMENDATION
Appoint Board members and alternates.
2. Approve the attached Resolution.
3. Select a date for an organizational meeting with School Board and
Property Appraiser. The Property Appraiser has requested the meeting
be held on Tuesday, August 11, 1998 at 8:45 a.m. in the First Floor
Conference Room of the County Administration Building.
JULY 79 1998
0
-52-
ON MOTION by Commissioner Macht,
SECONDED by Commissioner Ginn, the Board
unanimously (1) appointed Commissioners Adams,
Macht, and Ginn, to serve on the Value Adjustment
Board for 1998, with Chairman Tippin and
Commissioner Eggert designated as alternates; (2)
selected Tuesday, August 11, 1998 at 8:45 a.m. in
the First Floor Conference Room of the County
Administration Building for the organizational
meeting with the School Board and Property
Appraiser; and (3) adopted Resolution 98-071
appointing the 1998 Value Adjustment Board
Members and waiving statutory per diem
compensation.
RESOLUTION NO. 98-71
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY,
FLORIDA, APPOINTING THE 1988 VALUE
ADJUSTMENT BOARD MEMBERS, AND REJECTING
STATUTORY PER DIEM COMPENSATION.
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners Is required to
appoint three members to the Value Adjustment Board by Florida Statutes, Section
194.015; and
WHEREAS, the School Board of Indian River County has appointed
its membership to the Board with allowance of per diem compensation for such
members in accordance with Florida Statutes, Section 194.015 (1997); and
WHEREAS, the cited statute requires a specific election from both the
County Commission and the School Board in order to allow such compensation; and
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River
County elect to waive the statutory per diem compensation,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County
Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida, that:
1. The foregoing recitals are hereby ratified and acknowledged;
2. Commissioners Adams, Macht, and Ginn are appointed to the
1998 Value Adjustment Board with Commissioners Tippin and Eggert as alternates;
and
JULY 79 1998
r �--
3. The above-named members of the 1998 Value Adjustment
Board, or their duly authorized replacement, may not receive per diem compensation
for services provided on the board as allowed by law for State employees, pursuant
to the above cited statute.
The foregoing resolution was offered by Commissioner Macht and
seconded by Commissioner Ginn, and, upon being put to a vote, the vote was as
follows:
John W. Tippin, Chairman
Aye
Kenneth R. Macht Vice Chairman
Aye
Caroline D. Ginn
Aye
Fran B. Adams
Aye
Carolyn K Eggert
Aye
The Chairman thereupon declared the resolution duly passed and
adopted this 7th day of July, 1998.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
Jo ppin, C
ATTEST:
APPROVED A$ TO FORM
AND LEGAL SUFFICIENCY
S��
Jeffrey Barton Cl BY MAO
,�C WILLIAM G. COLLINS 11
DEPUTY COUNTY ATTORNEY
U.B. FLORIDA INTERMODAL TRANSPORTATION SUMMIT
REPORT AND NOMINATION TO THE GOVERNOR'S
FREIGHT TASK FORCE
The Board reviewed a letter of June 19, 1998:
\ STATE OF FLORIDA
►: Wtr>e of t t seven=
4�ae
WE �*THE CAMOL
TALLAHASSEE. FLORIDA 37399.0001
LAwnNN C LES
CKWMU 0R
June 19, 1998
Mr. Kenneth R. Macht, Commissioner
Board of County Commissioners
Indian River County Metropolitan Planning Office
1840 - 25th Street
Vero Beach, Florida 32960
Dear Mr. Macht:
FMi'3.! 10
G.r:rris.;ivt�ar5 ��
awu
At1t-;n�wr
Atf].'nCa
Senor,..I
CamTt1nny
Ut81?ies
Finance
OA18
Efierg. Sere .
Risk AUL
Other —�
JUL 0 2 1998
60.E =:C _ -.
CC:.i.., c L .
Thank you for participating in Florida's Intermodal Transportation Summit, an
event that marked the beginning of an effort to improve Florida's intermodal
transportation system. Governor Lawton Chiles clearly expressed the mission that lies
ahead - turn Florida from a trade gateway into a trade speedway. He and other
participants provided recommendations on how that can be accomplished, including:
JULY 7, 1998
• -54-
0
6
r
• Form a Freight Task Force.
• Think strategically, have a timetable and clear goals.
• Have a collaborative and action -oriented focus.
• Get involved and educate each other.
The Freight Task Force provides an excellent forum for implementing these and
other recommendations. Bringing the talent that exists in Florida to a common table will
allow us to achieve Governor Chiles' goal for Florida's intermodal transportation system.
Contact Robert G. Hebert, Administrator, Ports/Intermodal Rail Office, Florida
Department of Transportation at Phone: 850/4144500, Fax: 850/9224942 to obtain
details on the fust Task Force meeting.
If I can be of any assistance, please contact me at 850/488-2960.
Sincerely,
Paul D. Moses
Special Liaison for Florida Seaports
After discussion, CONSENSUS was reached to appoint Community Development
Director Bob Keating or MPO Planner Jacob Riger to the Governor's Freight Task Force.
B.C. LAND ACQUISITION AND MANAGEMENT ADVISORY
COMMITTEE MEETING REPORT REGARDING THE
COUNTY'S DESIRE FOR SHARED TITLE TO
ENVIRONMENTAL LAND ACQUISITIONS
Commissioner Adams reported on the meeting last Thursday in Tallahassee of the
Land Acquisition and Management Advisory Committee, which she attended with Attorney
William Roberts, the County's environmental adviser. She noted that one of the problems
discussed at that meeting was whether closing statements would have to be reviewed by each
county's attorneys. They will meet again on July 23'd when LAMAC will direct staff to list
all the pros and cons of allowing the County to retain a title interest in environmental land
purchases and present them at the August meeting. It looks very promising and she felt
confident it will all work out but believed it would be important for as many of the
Commissioners as possible to attend the August meeting to show support for the premise.
Chairman Tippin thanked Commissioner Adams for representing the Board in this
issue which is so important to the County.
JULY 79 1998
-55- HSA � F,1GE Jaz
ELr'? N FnE253
ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert,
SECONDED by Commissioner Adams, the Board
unanimously approved out -of -county travel for all
Commissioners to the August, 1998 meeting of the
Land Acquisition and Management Advisory
Committee in Tallahassee.
There being no further business, on Motion duly made, seconded and carried, the
Board adjourned at 10:20 a.m.
ATTEST:
J. K. Barton, Clerk
Minutes Approved:d4
JULY 711998
J ! W. Tipiin,Clfai6an