HomeMy WebLinkAbout9/1/19980 MINUTES ATTACHED 0
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
A G E N D A
TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 1, 1998
_ 9:00 A.M. - COUNTY COMMISSION CHAMBER
County Administration Building
1840 25th Street, Vero Beach, Florida 32960
COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
John W. Tippin, Chairman (District 4)
Kenneth R. Macht, Vice Chairman (District 3)
Fran B. Adams (District 1)
Carolyn K. Eggert (District 2)
Caroline D. Ginn (District 5)
James E. Chandler, County Administrator
Charles P. Vitunac, County Attorney
Jeffrey K. Barton, Clerk to the Board
9:00 a.m. 1. CALL TO ORDER BACKUP
2. INVOCATION Jeff Smith, Finance Office PAGES
3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE - Comm. Carolyn K. Eggert
4. ADDITIONS to the AGENDAIENIERGENCY ITEMS
1. Move Item 11.C., Bid Award: Annual Contract #901 S for Security Savices for solid Waste Disposal District, Gold Star Security,
to Item 14.8.3.
2. Move Item 13.13., Children's Services Network Assets Mapping, Analysis ofNeeds Assessment, Summary of Agency Application,
Children's Services Network Recommendations for Funding for Fiscal Year 1999-99 to Item 10.
5. PROCLAMATION and PRESENTATIONS
None
6. APPROVAL OF NUNUTES
Regular Meeting of August 18, 1998
7. CONSENT AGENDA
A. Approval of Warrants
(memorandum dated August 20, 1998) 1-9
B. Approval of Televising Contract Between School
Board and Indian River County
(memorandum dated August 21, 1998) 10-15
C. Approval of an Addendum to an Agreement with
Summerlin's Seven Seas, Inc., for Construction of
an Observation Platform at the Oslo Riverfront
Conservation Area
(memorandum dated August 26, 1998) 16-39
D. Bid Award: #9012 Annual Contract for Sludge
Removal Service - Utilities Dept.
(memorandum dated August 25, 1998) 40-46
BOOK 106 PAGE 357
BOOK NO PAGE 658
BACKUP
7. CONSENT AGENDA (cont'd.)
PAGES
E. Bid Award: #9009 Annual Contract for
Sulfuric Acid - Utilities Dept.
(memorandum dated August 25, 1998) 47-50
F. Bid Award: #9010 Annual Contract for Liquid
Chlorine - Utilities Dept.
(memorandum dated August 25, 1998) 51-54
G. Bid Award: #9011 Annual Contract for Antiscalant
Utilities Dept.
(memorandum dated August 25, 1998) 55-61
H. Bid Award: #9013 New Annual Contract for Cart-
ridge Filters - Utilities Dept.
(memorandum dated August 25, 1998) 62-66
I. Re -Award of IRC Bid #8044 Communications
Recording Systems - Emergency Services
(memorandum dated August 25,1998) 67-86
J. Miscellaneous Budget Amendment #026
(memorandum dated August 26, 1998) 87-88
K. 1 Recently Acquired Property - Tax Cancellation
(memorandum dated August 18, 1998) 89-92
L. Blake & Torres v. Indian River County
(memorandum dated August 20, 1998) 93-97
M. Budget Adjustment of $92,005 / Sheriff's Dept.
(letter dated August 25, 1998) 98
N. Budget Adjustment of $248,000 / Sheriffs Dept.
(letter dated August 25, 1998) 99-101
8. CONSTITUTIONAL OFFICERS and
GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES
None
9:05 A.M. 9. PUBLIC ITEMS
A. PUBLIC HEARINGS
1. AN ORDINANCE OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY,
FLORIDA, AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE
AND THE ACCOMPANYING ZONING MAP FROM
A-1 TO RS -6 AND RM -6, FOR PROPERTY LOCATED
ON THE NORTH BARRIER ISLAND, BETWEEN THE
EXISTING ISLAND CLUB SUBDMSION AND THE
INDIAN RIVER LAGOON, AND DESCRIBED HERE-
IN, AND PROVIDING FOR EFFECTIVE DATE
(Quasi -Judicial)
(memorandum dated August 25, 1998) 102-124
(re -scheduled from meeting of August 25, 1998)
BACKUP
9. PUBLIC ITEMS (cont'd.): PAGES
A. PUBLIC HEARINGS (cont'd.):
2. Laurel Homes, Inc.'s Request for Special
Exception Use Planned Development Approval
for a Residential Project to be Known as Laurel
Springs Subdivision (Quasi -Judicial)
(memorandum dated August 21, 1998) 125-136
3. Sebastian Water Expansion - Phase 1 I -B
Resolution III
(memorandum dated August 24,1998) 137-151
4. Second Public Hearing for the Expansion of
County Seat
(memorandum dated August 25, 1998) 152-154
B. PUBLIC DISCUSSION ITEMS
Appeal by Stuart and Deborah Segal of a County
Administrator's Decision (Quasi -Judicial)
(memorandum from Comm. Development) 155-187
C. PUBLIC NOTICE ITEMS
Scheduled for Public Hearing on September 8, 1998:
Approval of County Purchase of Six of Nine Parcels
in the "Round Island South" LAAC Site Under the
County Environmental Lands Program
(memorandum dated August 25, 1998) 188
10. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S MATTERS
None
11. DEPARTMENTAL MATTERS
A. Communhy Development
Appointment of an Advisory Group for
Review of the Jungle Trail Conservation
Area (Cairnvlrwin Tract) Management
Plan, as Required by State Procedures
(memorandum dated August 25, 1998) 189-196
2. Review and Consideration of Revised Indian
River County Local Housing Assistance Plan
(memorandum dated August 26, 1998) 197-326
B. Emergency Services
Hurricane Evacuation Procedures and Public Information
(memorandum dated August 26,1998) 327
C. General Services
Bid Award: Annual Contract #9015 for Security Services
Solid Waste Disposal District
(memorandum dated August 25, 1998) 328-331
D. Leisure Services
None
BOOK 100 PAGE X39-
BOOK JUG PAGE "6,"
11. DEPARTMENTAL MATTERS (cont'd )•
E. Office of Management and Budget
None
F. Personnel
None
G. Public Works
None
H. Utilities
Floravon Shores Subdivision Petition for Water
Service (110th Street) - Res. IV - Final Assessment
(memorandum dated August 24, 1998)
12. COUNTY ATTORNEY
None
13. COMMISSIONERS ITEMS
A. Chairman John W Tippin
B. Vice Chairman Kenneth R Macht
Children Services Network
Assets Mapping - Analysis of Needs Assessment -
Summary of Agency Application -
Children Services Network Recommendations
for Funding, FY 1998-99
(memorandum dated August 26, 1998)
C. Commissioner Fran B. Adams
D. Commissioner Carolyn K. Eggert
E. Commissioner Caroline D. Ginn
F. AdditionalItems
Annual Bond Requirements
(memorandum dated August 21, 1998)
14. SPECIAL DISTRICTS/BOARDS
A. _ Emergency Services District
None
BACKUP
PAGES
332-349
350-466
467
14. SPECIAL DISTRICTS/BOARDS tcont'd.l: BACKUP
PAGES
B. Solid Waste Disposal District
1. Approval of Minutes - meeting of 8-18-98
2. PSD Corrugated Cardboard Contract
(memorarndum dated August 7, 1998) 468-471
C. Environmental Control Board
None
15. ADJOURNMENT
Anyone who may wish to appeal any decision which may be made at this meeting will need
to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made which includes the testimony and
evidence upon which the appeal will be based.
Anyone who needs a special accommodation for this meeting may contact the county's
Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) coordinator at 567-8000 x408 at least 48 hours in advance
of meeting_
Meeting may be broadcast live on TCI Cable Channel 13 - rebroadcast various times
throughout the week
Falcon Cable Channel 35 - rebroadcast Friday evening
800K fAG� ld
0
0
INDEX TO MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING
OF BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
_ - - SEPTEMBER 1, 1998
1. CALL TO ORDER .............................................. -1-
2. INVOCATION ................................................. .1-
3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ....................................... 1-
4. ADDITIONS TO THE AGENDA .................................. .1-
6. APPROVAL OF MINUTES ........................................ 2-
7. CONSENT AGENDA ............................................ 2-
7.A. LIST OF WARRANTS ......................................... 2-
7.B. INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT - SCHOOL DISTRICT OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY -
VIDEOTAPING AND TELEVISING COMMISSION MEETINGS .............. .8-
7.C. SummERLIN'S SEVEN SEAS, INC. - ADDENDUM TO AGREEMENT FOR
CONSTRUCTION OF OBSERVATION PLATFORM AT OSLO RIVERFRONT
CONSERVATION AREA - FIND WATERWAYS ASSISTANCE GRANT ...... .9-
7.D. BID #9012 - ANNUAL CONTRACT FOR SLUDGE REMOVAL SERVICE - FLORIDA
SLUDGE................................................ .10-
7.E. BID #9009 - ANNUAL CONTRACT FOR SULFURIC ACID - JONES CHEMICAL
...................................................... .11-
7.F. BID #9010 - ANNUAL CONTRACT FOR LIQUID CHLORINE - JONES CHEMICAL
...................................................... .12-
7.G.. BID #9011- ANNUAL CONTRACT FOR ANTISCALANT - AMERICAN WATER -
CHEMICALS ............................................. -13-
7.H. BID #9013 - ANNUAL CONTRACT FOR CARTRIDGE FILTERS - A.E.S., INC.
...................................................... .14 -
SEPTEMBER 1, 1998
-1-
BOOK 100 PAGE,
BOOK FACE
7.I. BID #8044 - COMMUNICATIONS RECORDING SYSTEMS - CANCEL AWARD TO
AXIS TRICOM, INC. AND AWARD TO COMMUNICATIONS INTERNATIONAL
...................................................... .15-
7.J. MISCELLANEOUS BUDGET AMENDMENT #026 .................... .16-
7.K. RESOLUTION 98-086 - TAX CANCELLATION - SPALLONE AND KOVNOT
(ARCHIE CARR) .......................................... .17-
7.L. BLAKE AND TORRES v. INDIAN RIVER COUNTY ................... .21-
7.M. SHERIFF - BUDGET ADJUSTMENT OF $92,005 - INMATE HOUSING - JULY, 1998
...................................................... .22-
7.N. SHERIFF - BUDGET ADJUSTMENT OF $248,000 - INMATE HOUSING - AUGUST
AND SEPTEMBER, 1998 ..................................... .23-
9.A.1. PUBLIC HEARING - ORDINANCE 98-020 AMENDING THE ZONING
ORDINANCE AND THE ACCOMPANYING ZONING MAP FROM A-1 TO
RS -6 AND RM -6 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE NORTH BARRIER
ISLAND BETWEEN THE EXISTING ISLAND CLUB SUBDIVISION AND
THE INDIAN RIVER LAGOON (ORCHID PLACE - BEAZER HOMES) -
QUASI-JUDICIAL
............................................................ .25-
9.A.2. PUBLIC HEARING - LAUREL HOMES, INC. - REQUEST FOR SPECIAL
EXCEPTION USE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL FOR
RESIDENTIAL PROJECT TO BE KNOWN AS LAUREL SPRINGS
SUBDIVISION - QUASI-JUDICIAL ............................... .39-
9.A.3. PUBLIC HEARING - RESOLUTION 98-087 - SEBASTIAN WATER
EXPANSION - PHASE II -B ..................................... .47-
9.A.4. SECOND PUBLIC HEARING - RESOLUTION 98-088 - EXPANSION OF THE
COUNTY SEAT - TAX COLLECTOR ............................. .63-
9.B. PUBLIC DISCUSSION - STUART AND DEBORAH SEGAL - APPEAL OF A
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S DECISION - QUASI-JUDICIAL ........ .71 -
SEPTEMBER 1, 1998
9.C. PUBLIC NOTICE ITEMS - PUBLIC HEARING ON SEPTEMBER 8, 1998
REGARDING COUNTY PURCHASE OF SIX OF NINE PARCELS IN THE
"ROUND ISLAND SOUTH" LAAC SITE - COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL
LANDS PROGRAM ........................................... -78-
10. CHILDREN'S SERVICES NETWORK ASSETS MAPPING - ANALYSIS OF
NEEDS ASSESSMENT - SUMMARY OF AGENCY APPLICATION -
RECOMMENDATIONS FOR FUNDING FOR FISCAL YEAR 1998-99 .. -78-
1 l.A.1. RESOLUTION 98-089 - JUNGLE TRAIL CONSERVATION AREA
(CAIRNS/IRWIN TRACT) MANAGEMENT PLAN - APPOINTMENT
OF ADVISORY GROUP AS REQUIRED BY STATE PROCEDURES
...................................................... .82-
1 l.A.2. RESOLUTION 98-090 - REVISING INDIAN RIVER COUNTY LOCAL
HOUSING ASSISTANCE PLAN ............................ .87-
11.B. HURRICANE EVACUATION PROCEDURES AND PUBLIC INFORMATION
............................................................ .92-
I l.C. BID AWARD: ANNUAL CONTRACT #9015 FOR SECURITY SERVICES -
SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL DISTRICT ............................ .93-
1 LH. RESOLUTION 98-091- FLORAVON SHORES SUBDIVISION PETITION FOR
WATER SERVICE (110TH STREET) - FINAL ASSESSMENT ........... .93-
13.F.' ADDITIONAL ITEMS: ANNUAL BOND REQUIREMENTS ........... .99 -
DOCUMENTS TO BE MADE A PART OF THE RECORD - Spallone and Kovnot a
Option Agreement of May 8, 1998 ................................ .100-
14.B. SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL DISTRICT ........................... -100-
SEPTEMBER 1, 1998
i0
BOOK '�
-3- FACE
September 1, 1998
REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS
The Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida, met in Regular
Session at the County Commission Chambers, 1840 25' Street, Vero Beach, Florida, on
Tuesday, September 1, 1998, at 9:00 a.m. Present were John W. Tippin, Chairman; Kenneth
R. Macht, Vice Chairman; Fran B. Adams; Carolyn K. Eggert; and Caroline D. Ginn. Also
present were James E. Chandler, County Administrator; Charles P. Vitunac, County
Attorney; and Patricia "PJ" Jones, Deputy Clerk.
1. CALL TO ORDER
Chairman Tippin called the meeting to order.
2. INVOCATION
Jeff Smith of the Finance Office delivered the Invocation.
3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Commissioner Eggert led the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag.
4. ADDITIONS TO THE AGENDA
Chairman Tippin requested the following changes to today's Agenda:
1. Item I I.C., Bid Award: Annual Contract #9015 for Security Services for Solid
Waste Disposal District, Gold Star Security, should be moved to Item 14.B.3.
2. Item 13.B., Children's Services Network Assets Mapping, Analysis of Needs
Assessment, Summary of Agency Application, Children's Services Network
Recommendations for Funding for Fiscal Year 1998-99, should be moved to
Item 10.
SEPTEMBER 1, 1998
BOOK 1-00 PAGE i,"35
BOOK 10 FACE U36
ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert,
SECONDED by Commissioner Adams, the Board
unanimously added the above items to the Agenda.
6. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
The Chairman asked if there were any corrections or additions to the Minutes of the
Regular Meeting of August 18, 1998. There were none.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert,
SECONDED by Commissioner Ginn, the Board
unanimously approved the Minutes of the Regular
Meeting of August 18, 1998, as written.
7. -CONSENT AGENDA
Commissioner Adams requested that Item 7.L. be pulled for discussion.
Commissioner Ginn requested that Item 7.N. be pulled for discussion.
7.A. LIST OF WARRANTS
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of August 20, 1998:
TO: HONORABLE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
DATE: AUGUST 20, 1998
SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF WARRANTS
FROM: EDWIN M. FRY, JR.. FINANCE DIRECTOR
In compliance with Chapter 136.06. Florida Statutes, all warrants issued
by the Board of County Commissioners are to be recorded in the Board minutes.
Approval is requested for the attached list of warrants. issued by the C1erK
to the Board. for the time period of August 18 to August 20. 1998.
SEPTEMBER 1, 1998
•
SEPTEMBER 1, 1998
•
-3-BOOK FACE 0
ON MOTION by Commissioner
Eggert,
SECONDED by Commissioner Ginn,
the Board
unanimously approved the list of Warrants as issued
by the Clerk to the Board for the period from August
18, 1998 through August 20, 1998, as recommended
by staff.
CHECK
NAME
CHECK
CHECK
NUMBER
DATE
AMOUNT
0019539
TRANS GENERAL LIFE INSURANCE
1998-08-18
2,988.60
0019540
AMERICAN DENTAL PLAN (FLORIDA)
1998-08-18
1,868.22
0019541
IRC EMPLOYEE HEALTH INSURANCE-
1998-08-18
6,437.50
0019542
KRUCZKIEWICZ, LORIANE
1998-08-19
138.50
0019543
BREVARD COUNTY CLERK OF THE
1998-08-19
422.04
0019544
ORANGE COUNTY CLERK OF THE
1998-08-19
135.20
0019545
ST LUCIE COUNTY CLERK OF THE
1998-08-19
350.50
0019546
RICHLAND COUNTY CLERK OF THE
1998-08-19
150.00
0019547
VELASQUEZ, MERIDA
1998-08-19
200.00
0019548
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY CLERK OF
1996-08-19
5,341.92
0019549
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY BOARD OF
1998-08-19
144.95
0019550
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
1998-08-19
200.00
0019551
VERO BEACH FIREFIGHTERS ASSOC.
1998-08-19
1,932.00
0019552
INDIAN RIVER FEDERAL CREDIT
1998-08-19
84,759.36
0019553
COLONIAL LIFE & ACCIDENT
1998-06-19
257.69
0019554
NACO/SOUTHEAST
1998-08-19
5,203.35
0019555
KEY TRUST COMPANY
1998-08-19
760.25
0019556
OKEECHOBEE CO., PMTS DOMES REI,
1998-08-19
167.25
0019557
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
1998-08-19
100.00
0019558
DOUGLAS COUNTY CLERK OF COURT
1998-08-19
23.08
0019559
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY BOARD OF
1998-08-19
36.52
0242662
JONES, RICHARD & JUDY
1998-05-21
.00
0244549
TRI -COUNTY GAS
1998-06-25
.00
0245172
SALEM PRESS, INC
1998-07-02
.00
0246530
DOUBLE TREE HOTEL
1998-07-30
,00
0246916
EDWARD S MASSEY AND
1998-08-06
.00
0247199
ELMORE, JAMES A
1998-08-13
.00
0247423
NALBANDIAN, KNARIK
1998-08-13
.00
0247472
A A FIRE EQUIPMENT, INC
1998-08-20
195.50
0247473
ACE PLUMBING, INC
1998-08-20
60.50
0247474
ADVANCED GARAGE DOORS, INC
1998-08-20
109.56
0247475
ABR, C JONATHAN PHD
1998-08-20
225.00
0247476
AIRBORNE EXPRESS
1998-08-20
9.25
0247477
ALPHA ACE HARDWARE
1998-08-20
28.77
0247478
APPLE INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY CO
1998-08-20
255.67
0247479
ATLAS PEN & PENCIL CORP
1998-08-20
315.23
0247480
A W W A
1998-08-20
100.00
0247481
ABS PUMPS, INC
1998-08-20
493.96
0247482
ALLIED METAL DOORS &
1998-08-20
848.70
0247483
ARCHIVE PUBLISHING
1998-08-20
224.00
0247484
ANESTHESIA OF INDIAN RIVER,INC
1998-08-20
364.40
0247485
A T & T
1998-08-20
89.68
0247486
AVID READER, THE
1998-08-20
347.00
0247487
AMERICAN LIBRARY ASSOC
1998-08-20
76.50
0247488
ATLANTIC COASTAL TITLE CORP
1998-08-20
137.00
0247489
ALL COUNTY EQUIPMENT COMPANY
1998-08-20
1,309.00
0247490
ALBERTSON,S PHARMACY
1996-08-20
333.55
0247491
ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES
1998-08-20
153.63
0247492
AMERICAN REPORTING
1998-08-20
40.00
0247493
ARCH PAGING
1998-08-20
12.84
0247494
AYCOCK FUNERAL HOMES
1998-08-20
800.00
0247495
AMERISYS, INC
1998-08-20
888.10
0247496
B & B INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY
1998-08-20
1,099.44
0247497
BAKER DISTRIBUTING CO
1998-08-20
548.07
0247498
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
1998-08-20
5,863.54
0247499
BENSONS LOCK SERVICE
1998-08-20
37.00
0247500
BROOKS METER BOX CO
1998-08-20
2,059.20
0247501
BRUGNOLI, ROBERT J PHD
1998-08-20
500.00
0247502
BARTON, JEFFREY K -CLERK
1998-08-20
4,001.25
0247503
BARTON, JEFFREY K
1998-08-20
4,258.40
0247504
BRODART CO
1998-08-20
759.75
0247505
BLATUS, JAMES
1998-08-20
352.01
SEPTEMBER 1, 1998
•
-3-BOOK FACE 0
I
n+Yi
BOOK DO PAGE63
CHECK
NAME
CHECK
CHECK
NUMBER
DATE
AMOUNT
0247506
BRANDTS & FLETCHERS APPLIANCE
1998-08-20
42.50
0247507
BLAIS ELECTRIC, INC
1998-08-20
615.05
0247508
BOYNTON PUMP & IRRIGATION
1998-08-20
179.77
0247509
BROWN, DONALD JR
1998-08-20
997.00
0247510
BETHEA, WANDA DR
1998-08-20
300.00
0247511
BREVARD BOILER CO
1998-08-20
494.00
0247512
BFI MEDICAL WASTE SYSTEMS
1998-08-20
146.60
0247513
BAKER & TAYLOR ENTERTAINMENT
1998-08-20
15.18
0247514
BELLSOUTH MOBILITY
1998-08-20
16.03
0247515
BELLSOUTH
1998-08-20
5,164.76
0247516
BOLLE AMERICA, INC
1998-08-20
8.90
0247517
BLUE CROSS/BLUE SHIELD OF
1998-08-20
17,116.00
0247518
BURKE, DONNIE
1998-08-20
169.95
0247519
BLACKBURN, COLE
1998-08-20
164.80
0247520
BREVARD REHABILITATION MED
1998-08-20
154.00
0247521
BAKER EQUIPMENT ENGINEERING CO
1998-08-20
30,787.02
0247522
BROWN, JASON
1998-08-20
125.72
0247523
CAMERON & BARKLEY COMPANY
1998-08-20
366.14
0247524
CAMP, DRESSER & MCKEE, INC
1998-08-20
9,500.00
0247525
CARTER ASSOCIATES, INC
1998-08-20
999.90
0247526
CHUCK'S ELECTRIC MOTORS, INC
1998-08-20
450.00
0247527
CLASSIC AWARDS
1998-08-20
198.97
0247528
COLD AIR DISTRIBUTORS
1998-08-20
729.04
0247529
COMMUNICATIONS INT'L INC
1998-08-20
697.31
0247530
CORBIN, SHIRLEY E
1998-08-20
815.50
0247531
CLEARFIELD COMPANY, INC
1998-08-20
277.20
0247532
COASTAL REFINING & MARKETING
1998-08-20
6,586.06
0247533
CLINIC PHARMACY
1998-08-20
50.62
0247534
CITGO PETROLEUM CORP
1998-08-20
1,676.23
0247535
CUSTOM CARRIAGES, INC
1998-08-20
334.87
0247536
CHIVERS NORTH AMERICA
1998-08-20
44.64
0247537
CUES, INC
1998-08-20
5,900.00
0247538
CITY ELECTRIC SUPPLY CO
1998-08-20
844.25
0247539
C4 IMAGING SYSTEMS INC
1998-08-20
23.04
0247540
CORPORATION OF THE PRESIDENT
1998-08-20
29.25
0247541
CARROLL AIR SYSTEMS, INC
1998-08-20
5,304.00
0247542
CARTER, CYNTHIA L
1998-08-20
6.00
0247543
CENTRAL PUMP & SUPPLY INC
1998-08-20
9.72
0247544
CUSTOM PUBLISHING SERVICES INC
1998-08-20
278.00
0247545
CAMPBELL, STEPHANIE
1998-08-20
82.40
0247546
CENTER FOR EMOTIONAL AND
1998-08-20
142.50
0247547
CARTER, KELLY
1998-08-20
296.13
0247548
COMMUNITY QUICK MEDICAL CLINIC
1998-08-20
210.00
0247549
CHESTNUTT, JAY
1998-08-20
30.90
0247550
CHIARANTONA, NICOLE
1998-08-20
12.88
0247551
C W NEILSON MANUFACTURING CORP
1998-08-20
330.30
0247552
CASCIO, MARYANN
1998-08-20
10.00
0247553
CENTRAL AIR CONDITIONING &
1998-08-20
110.18
0247554
DAILY COURIER SERVICE
1998-08-20
84.00
0247555
DELTA SUPPLY CO
1998-08-20
9.00
0247556
DEPENDABLE DODGE, INC
1998-08-20
126.84
0247557
DEVANT, LTD
1998-08-20
401.03
0247558
DICKERSON-FLORIDA, INC
1998-08-20
275,156.61
0247559
DICKEY SCALES, INC
1998-08-20
325.00
0247560
DICTAPHONE CORPORATION
1998-08-20
981.20
0247561
DIRECTOR, KENNETH L MD PA
1998-08-20
200.00
0247562
DOCTOR'S CLINIC
1998-08-20
456.18
0247563
DADE PAPER COMPANY
1998-08-20
167.53
0247564
DESIGNED TRAFFIC
1998-08-20
17,312.00
0247565
DENNY'S
1998 -OS -20
16.65
0247566
DOWNTOWN PRODUCE INC
1998-08-20
171.82
0247567
DATABASE TECHNOLOGIES INC
1998-08-20
19.00
0247568
DOCTORS' CLINIC
1998-08-20
90.00
0247569
E -Z BREW COFFEE SERVICE, INC
1998-08-20
151.80
0247570
EBSCO SUBSCRIPTION SERVICES
1998-08-20
22.05
0247571
ELPE%, INC
1998-08-20
"814.27
0247572
EDLUND & DRITENBAS
1998-08-20
4,030.33
0247573
ECRERD DRUG CO
1998-08-20
42.23
0247574
EGGEN, BETH
1996-08-20
12.88
0247575
FINNEY, DONALD G
1998-08-20
12.47
0247576
FLORIDA COCA-COLA BOTTLING CO
1998-08-20
583.20
0247577
FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY
1998-08-20
38,392.06
0247578
FRASER ENGINEERING & TESTING
1998-08-20
480.00
0247579
FRED PRYOR SEMINARS
1998-08-20
236.00
0247580
FLOWERS BAKING COMPANY OF
1998-08-20
120.57
0247581
FLINN, SHEILA I
1998-08-20
199.50
0247582
FMC CORP
1998-08-20
4,440.00
0247583
FALZONE, KATHY
1998-08-20
73.66
0247584
FALZONE, MATTHEW
1998-08-20
20.60
0247585
FLORIDAFFINITY, INC
1998-08-20
6,987.00
0247586
FATHER & SON CARPET CLEANING
1998-08-20
259.20
SEPTEMBER 1, 1998
-4-
•
SEPTEMBER 1, 1998
-5- BOOK 10 PAGE �"od
CHECK NAME
CHECK
CHECK
NUMBER
DATE
AMOK
0247587 FLOYD MD, IRA
1998-08-20
196.00
0247588 FLORIDA CLINICAL PRACTICE
1998-08-20
51.24
0247589 FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT
1998-08-20
124.14
0247590 FRYER'S ON-LINE
1998-08-20
75.00
0247591 FLORIDA HISTORICAL LIBRARY
1998-06-20
102.20
0247592 GATOR LUMBER COMPANY
1996-08-20
6.52
0247593 GREYHOUND LINES, INC.
1998-08-20
181.00
0247594 GENTILE, MICM-L
1998-08-20
155.60
0247595 GALE RESEARCH, INC
1998-08-20
138.10
0247596 GEE, DEBORAH L
1998-08-20
382.64
0247597 GOLLNICK, PEGGY
1998-08-20
588.00
0247598 HUNTER AUTO SUPPLIES
1998-08-20
1,490.09
0247599 HERITAGE BOOKS, INC
1998-08-20
123.00
0247600 HELD, PATRICIA BARGO
1998-08-20
577.50
0247601 HACH COMPANY
1998-08-20
182.00
0247602 HOLMES REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER
1998-08-20
42.00
0247603 HUD USER
1998-08-20
5.00
0247604 HYATT REGENCY PIER SIXTY-SIX
1998-08-20
315.00
0247605 HISTORICAL MUSEUM OF SOUTHERN
1998-08-20
90.36
0247606 HARTSFIELD, CELESTE L
1998 -OS -20
147.00
0247607 HEALTHSOUTH INDIAN RIVER
1998-08-20
1,640.72
0247608 HEALTHSOUTH ORLANDO CENTER
1998-08-20
2,157.66
0247609 HALL -MARK FIRE APPARATUS, INC
1998-08-20
1,115.64
0247610 HANSON ENGINEERS, INC.
1998-08-20
3,141.00
0247611 HAEFNER,LAURA A SINGLE PERSON
1998-08-20
2,500.00
0247612 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
1998-08-20
100.00
0247613 INSTRUMENTATION SERVICES, INC
1998-08-20
1,086.00
0247614 INDIAN RIVER BATTERY, INC
1998-08-20
1,812.56
0247615 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY UTILITY
1998-08-20
693.48
0247616 INDIAN RIVER OXYGEN, INC
1998-08-20
503.25
0247617 INGRAM LIBRARY SERVICES
1996-08-20
34.43
0247618 ISIS PUBLISHING
1998-08-20
38.47
0247619 INDIAN RIVER MEMORIAL HOSPITAL
1998-08-20
528.94
0247620 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY SCHOOL
1998-08-20
1,575.00
0247621 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
1998-08-20
1,430.00
0247622 INSURANCE SERVICING &
1998-08-20
275.00
0247623 IRC EMPLOYEE HEALTH INSURANCE-
1998-08-20
204,159.84
0247624 INDIAN RIVER SHORES POLICE
1998-08-20
25.00
0247625 IMI -NET, INC
1998-08-20
900.00
0247626 INDIAN RIVER MRI ASSOCIATES
1998-08-20
1,325.00
0247627 INTER -TEL
1998-08-20
784.00
0247628 IRRIGATION CONSULTANTS UNLIMIT
1998-08-20
78,73
0247629 INDIAN RIVER HAND
1998-06-20
118.00
0247630 JACOBS ELECTRIC MOTOR REPAIR
1998-08-20
25.00
0247631 JANIE DEAN CHEVROLET, INC
1998-08-20
64.99
0247632 JORGENSEN, PETER ESQ
1998-08-20
1,375.00
0247633 JR REPORTING ASSOCIATES, INC
1998-08-20
25.00
0247634 JUDICIAL ASSISTANT ASSOCIATION
1998-08-20
5.00
0247635 JEWETT ORTHOPAEDIC CLINIC
1998-08-20
157.50
0247636 JAAF
1998-08-20
25.00
0247637 JUDICIAL ASSISTANT'S
1998-08-20
10.00
0247638 KIMLEY-HORN & ASSOCIATES, INC
1998-08-20
5,070.77
0247639 KING, JOHN W
1998-08-20
94.16
0247640 KNIGHT & MATHIS, INC
1998-08-20
53.70
0247641 KAUFFMANN, ALAN
1998-08-20
54.52
0247642 K S M ENGINEERING & TESTING
1998-08-20
156.00
0247643 KIRBY AUTO SUPPLY FT PIERCE
1998-08-20
1,119.36
0247644 KIRBY AUTO SUPPLY FT PIERCE
1998-08-20
143.82
0247645 KAPLAN, KAREN DC
1998-08-20
279.90
0247646 KOEHN, ADAM
1998-08-20
262.65
0247647 LONG, JAMES T ESQUIRE
1998-08-20
12,623.57
0247648 L 8 SMITH, INC
1998-08-20
108.81
0247649 LIVE OAK LAWN SUPPLY INC
1998-08-20
7,700.00
0247650 LUCENT TECHNOLOGIES
1998-08-20
86.95
0247651 L H TRAVIS, INC
1998-08-20
453.20
0247652 LARGE, JAMES W MD
1998-08-20
684.00
0247653 LEWIS, SHANNON
1998-08-20
169.95
0247654 LYNN PEAVEY CO
1998-08-20
46.80
0247655 MCCOLLUM, NATHAN
1998-08-20
115.16
0247656 MCCORKLE RADIOLOGY
1998-08-20
6,586.00
0247657 MICKLER'S FLORIDIANA, INC
1998-08-20
18.13
0247658 MILNER DOCUMENT PRODUCTS
1998-08-20
8,426.70
0247659 MITCO WATER LAB, INC
1998-08-20
495.53
0247660 MORGAN, DAVID C
1998-08-20
693.32
0247661 MARTINS LAMAR UNIFORMS
1998-08-20
658.35
0247662 MORA, RALPH pHD
1998-08-20
1,400.00
0247663 MATRX MEDICAL, INC
1998-06-20
377.32
0247664 MCGINNIS, LYNDA, LPN
1998-08-20
80.00
0247665 MASTELLER & MOLER, INC
1998-08-20
3,018.58
0247666 MEDICAL RECORD SERVICES, INC
1998 -OS -20
9.05
0247667 MURRAY, HELEN LMHC
1998-08-20
80.00
SEPTEMBER 1, 1998
-5- BOOK 10 PAGE �"od
SEPTEMBER 1, 1998
-6-
BOOK PAGE 6��'
CHECK
NAME
CHECK
CHECK
NUMBER
DATE
AMOUNT
0247668
MR BOB PORTABLE TOILET
1998-08-20
201.12
0247669
MITY-LITE
1998-08-20
934.00
0247670
MARC INDUSTRIES
1998-08-20
379.88
0247671
MEDCHECK
1998-08-20
18.12
0247672
MELCHIORI, NICK
1998-08-20
84.98
0247673
MCGUIRE, GEORGE SEAN
1998-08-20
118.46
0247674
MACWILLIAMS, KEVIN ESQ
1998-08-20
1,022.51
0247675
NORTH SOUTH SUPPLY
1998-08-20
99.38
0247676
NATIONAL SEMINARS GROUP
1998-08-20
5.00
0247677
NORTHERN SAFETY COMPANY
1998-08-20
278.70
0247678
NU CO 2, INC
1998-08-20
65.75
0247679
NEVOR, NICK
1998-08-20
169.95
0247680
OFFICE PRODUCTS & SERVICE
1998-08-20
2,176.51
0247681
OSBORN, MERLE RN
1998-08-20
116.00
0247682
OFFICE DEPOT, INC
1998-08-20
204.69
0247683
ODYSSEY GOLF
1998-08-20
400.90
0247664
O'NEIL, LEE & WEST
1998-08-20
19,815.66
0247685
OMNI HEALTH CARE
1998-08-20
641.17
0247686
ORLANDO HAND SURGERY ASSOC.
1998-08-20
136.00
0247687
PAULS AUTO ELECTRIC
1998-08-20
485.06
0247688
PEACE RIVER ELECTRIC
1998-08-20
216.20
0247689
PERKINS DRUG, INC
1998-08-20
181.51
0247690
PERKINS INDIAN RIVER PHARMACY
1998-08-20
77.13
0247691
PETERSEN, RUSSELL G ESQ
1998-08-20
18.90
0247692
POSTMASTER
1998-08-20
163.00
0247693
PRIDE OF FLORIDA
1998-08-20
7,457.00
0247694
PETRILLA, FRED J JR PHD
1998-08-20
500.00
0247695
PINKERTON, DOREEN A
1998-08-20
181.12
0247696
PORT PETROLEUM, INC
1998-08-20
827.70
0247697
PANGSURN, KENNETH J & RHEA
1998-08-20
24.00
0247698
PRESS JOURNAL
1998-08-20
472.50
0247699
PAR -MAIL
1998-08-20
78.50
0247700
PAGENET OF FLORIDA
1998-08-20
202.23
0247701
PRIZE POSSESSIONS
1998-08-20
128.46
0247702
PRABAIR DISTRIBUTION
1998-08-20
181.03
0247703
PEGASUS TRAVEL
1998-08-20
245.00
0247704
PROMEDIX CORP
1998-08-20
1,120.00
0247705
PROFESSIONAL OUTFITTERS
1998-08-20
199.95
0247706
QUALITY JANITORIAL SERVICE
1998-08-20
260.00
0247707
RADIO SHACK ACCT RECEIVABLE
1998-08-20
244.54
0247708
RIFKIN, SHELDON H PHD
1998-08-20
2,750.00
0247709
RUSSELL CONCRETE, INC
1998-08-20
789.59
0247710
RICHMOND HYDRAULICS INC
1998-08-20
398.16
0247711
R & G SOD FARMS
1998-08-20
174.00
0247712
RUBBER STAMP EXPRESS & MORE
1998-08-20
55.31
0247713
REARDON, RICK
1998-08-20
117.00
0247714
RICHARDS, WILLIAM A
1998-08-20
394.34
0247715
RANGER CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRIES
1998-08-20
19,862.91
0247716
R B MEADOWS & ASSOC
1998-08-20
1,703.40
0247717
ROBERTS, RUSH A
1998-08-20
350.20
0247718
RUSSELL, KERRY
1998-08-20
669.12
0247719
ROYAL CUP COFFEE
1998-08-20
94.51
0247720
RAUTH, GENE
1998-08-20
12.50
0247721
SAFETY KLEEN CORP
1998-08-20
200.75
0247722
SCHULTZ, DON L MD
1998-08-20
400.00
0247723
SCOTT'S SPORTING GOODS
1998-08-20
15.00
0247724
SCOTTY'S, INC
1998-08-20
377.99
0247725
SIR SPEEDY
1998-08-20
204.12
0247726
SOUTHERN EAGLE DISTRIBUTING,
1998-08-20
299.83
0247727
SOUTHSIDE ANIMAL HOSPITAL
1998-08-20
15.00
0247728
SAFESPACE, INC
1998-08-20
1,250.00
0247729
STURGIS LUMBER & PLYWOOD CO
1998-08-20
675.38
0247730
SUNSHINE PHYSICAL THERAPY
1998-08-20
30.00
0247731
SERVICE REFRIGERATION CO, INC
1998-08-20
104.00
0247732
SAKALAS, ROMAS MD
1998-08-20
114.00
0247733
SCHOOL DISTRICT OF IRC
1998-08-20
1,.492.42
0247734
SHADY OAK ANIMAL CLINIC
1998 -OS -20
36.50
0247735
SKRIPAK, RICHARD DDS
1998-08-20
142.00
0247736
SUPERIOR PRINTING
1998-08-20
79.00
0247737
SYSCO FOOD SERVICES OF
1998-08-20
616.18
0247738
SEBASTIAN POLICE DEPARTMENT
1998-08-20
25.00
0247739
SIMS, MATTHEW
1998-08-20
147.90
0247740
ST JOHNS RIVER WATER MGMT DIST
1998-08-20
350.00 -
0247741
SOUTHERN SECURITY SYSTEMS -OF -
1998-08-20
380.00
-0247742
SHORE -LINE CARPET SUPPLIES OF
1998-08-20
59.69
0247743
STAGE & SCREEN
1998-08-20
33.24
0247744
SIMS, AMY MD
1998-08-20
410.10
0247745
SEKOT LABORATORIES INC
1998-08-20
1,550.00
0247746
SAUCEDO-TRAPERO MD, ROBERT
1998-08-20
114.00
0247747
SCANDIA VILLAGE GOOD SAMARITAN
1998-08-20
847.00
0247748
SEARS TERMITE & PEST CONTROL
1998-08-10
140.36
0247749
SECURITYLINK FROM AMERITECH
1998-08-20
448.50
SEPTEMBER 1, 1998
-6-
•
0
CHECK
NAME
CHECK
CHECK
NUMBER
DATE
AMOUNT
0247750
SCOTT'S TREE SERVICE
1998-08-20
275.00
0247751
SERVICE MERCHANDISE
1998-06-20
39.99
0247752
TEN -8 FIRE EQUIPMENT, INC
1998-08-20
382.72
0247753
TROY FAIN INSURANCE, INC
1998-08-20
93.97
0247754
TURNER'S CHILD DAY CARE
1998-08-20
2,060.00
0247755
TREASURE COAST REFUSE CORP
1998-08-20
651.77
0247756
TREASURE COAST DATA PROCESSING
1998-08-20
255.00
0247757
TRANS -GENERAL LIFE INSURANCE
1998-08-20
5,625.64
0247758
TATTEGRAIN, REV RAYMOND
1998-08-20
50.00
0247759
TRI -COUNTY GAS
1998-08-20
33.33
0247760
TRUGREEN CHEMLAWN
1998-08-20
73.00
0247761
TARGET STORE T-1050
1998-08-20
263.78
0247762
SMITH, TERRY L
1998-08-20
47.56
0247763
TREASURE COAST MASSAGE THERAPY
1998-08-20
182.00
0247764
TELECTRON
1998-08-20
182.85
0247765
TELECOMMUNICATIONS
1998-08-20
30.19
0247766
US FILTER DISTRIBUTION GROUP
1998-08-20
9,229.69
0247767
VELDE FORD, INC
1998-08-20
265.44
0247768
VERO BEACH PRINTING CO
1998-08-20
36.00
0247769
VERO BEACH, CITY OF
1998-08-20
24,810.54
0247770
VERO CHEMICAL DISTRIBUTORS,INC
1998-08-20
2,942.11
0247771
VERO LAWNMOWER CENTER, INC
1998-08-20
261.39
0247772
VERO'S MOTEL
1998-08-20
160.00
0247773
VORTECH PHARMACEUTICALS
1998-08-20
5.85
0247774
VERO BEACH POLICE DEPARTMENT
1998-08-20
150.00
0247775
VERO BOWL
1998-08-20
344.00
0247776
VERO BEARING & BOLT
1998-08-20
121.00
0247777
VOLUNTEER ACTION CENTER
1998-08-20
50.00
0247778
VERO BEACH POWERTRAIN
1998-08-20
63.00
0247779
VANTAGE EQUIPMENT CO
1998-08-20
22.80
0247780
VALENTINI, PATRICK
1998-08-20
45.44
0247781
WAL-MART STORES, INC
1998-08-20
221.29
0247782
WALGREENS PHARMACY #03608
1998-08-20
530.46
0247783
WEST PUBLISHING PAYMENT CENTER
1998-08-20
382.00
0247784
W W GRAINGER, INC
1998-08-20
337.66
0247785
WIGINTON FIRE SPRINKLERS,INC
1998-08-20
1,139.00
0247786
WINN DIXIE ORLANDO
1998-08-20
542.31
0247787
WAL-MART PHARMACY, INC
1998-08-20
45.68
0247788
WILLHOFF, PATSY
1998-08-20
130.00
0247789
WINN DIXIE STORE
1998-08-20
4.12
0247790
WILLIAM THIES & SONS, INC
1998-08-20
114.00
0247791
WACHTEL, JOHN
1998-08-20
195.00
0247792
WHEELER, GARY SHERIFF
1998-08-20
11,285.00
0247793
WABASSO GOLF
1998-08-20
300.00
0247794
WILSON, MARGARET F
1998-08-20
76.76
0247795
WHEATLEY, ALAN
1998-08-20
8.20
0247796
WRAP N' SHIP
1998-08-20
7.15
0247797
WOSN-FM RADIO STATION
1998-08-20
143.50
0247798
WINDLE, BEN
1998-08-20
175.10
0247799
WORLDCa!
1998-08-20
102.01
0247800
WELLS, CARLOS L, ESQ
1998-08-20
5.00
0247801
XEROX CORPORATION
1998-08-20
300.49
0247802
ZIMMERMANN, KARL
1998-08-20
101.70
0247803
ZIi4ORMANN, KARL
1998-08-20
4,189.00
0247804
ZEPHYRHILLS NATURAL SPRING
1998-08-20
24.75
0247805
PEASE, CLINTON
1998-08-20
298,68
0247806
JOHNSON, LETISHA D
1998-08-20
988.00
0247807
CONE, SCOTT
1998-08-20
52.51
SEPTEMBER 1, 1998
1,016,015.36
-7- BOOK I.UU FAGE U y I
BOOK DO PAGE 672
7.B. INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT - SCHOOL DISTRICT OFINDIANRIVER
COUNTY- VIDEDTAPING AND TELEVISING COMMISSION MEEnyGS
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of August 21, 1998:
MEMORANDUM
DATE: August 21, 1998
TO: Alice White
FROM: Judy A. Stang
SUBJECT: Video Contract
Enclosed are two original contracts for the video taping contract. Language
changes were made to page 3, B and page 4, C(1). The change made on page
3 refers to the increase from $100.00 per hour to $115.00 per hour. The change
made on page 4 refers to the language requested by the county attorney making
this a continuous contract.
Please call me at 564-3200 and I will come and pick up the signed contract.
Once the school board has signed the contract, I will give you an original for your
files.
Respectfully submitted,
ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert,
SECONDED by Commissioner Ginn, the Board
unanimously approved the Interlocal Agreement with
The School District of Indian River County for
videotaping commission meetings at the rate of $115
per hour.
AGREEMENT IS ON FILE IN THE
OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
SEPTEMBER 1, 1998
e
• 0
7C SUMMERLIN'S SEVEN SEAS. ING - ADDEND UM TO AGREEMENT FOR
CONSTRUCTION OF OBSER VA TION PLA TFORM A T OSLO RIVERFRONT
CONSERVATIONAREA - FIND WATERWAYS ASSISTANCE GRANT
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of August 26, 1998:
TO: James E. Chandler
County Administrator
DEPARTMENT HEAD CONCURRENCE:
O��_ fll DATE: August 26,1998
Robert M. Keati MWAICP/
Community Development Director
FROM: Roland M. DeBlois, AICP
Chief Environmental Planning
RE: Approval of an Addendum to an Agreement with Summerlin's Seven Seas. Inc., for
Construction of an Observation Plafform at the Oslo Riverf rant Conservation Area
It is requested that the data herein presented be given formal consideration by the Board of County
Commissioners at its regular meeting of September 1. 1998.
On August 11, 1998, the Board of County Commissioners authorized staff to amend a contract with
Summerlm's Seven Seas for that company to construct an observation platform at the Oslo Rivetfront
Conservation Area. at a cost of $36,800 (see attached minutes). The project is to be partially fimded by a
Florida Inland Navigation District (FIND) Waterways Assistance grant.
Staff has since drafted an addendum to the previous connect relating to construction of the observation
platform (see attached). The Addendum is herein presented for the Board's approval consideration.
ANALYSTS
The Addendum is structured similar to the original contract with Summerlin's Seven Seas. The Addendum
specifies that the observation phdorm must be Meted by September 30, 1998, which is the ultimate
deadline of the FIND grant. The Addendum also provides that payment to the contractor will be in one lump
sum, but only after the observation platform is inspected by county staff and found to be satisfactorily
completed
Since the work consists of one structure that will be constructed in a matter of weeks, and payment will be
in one lump sum vs. a series of payments, the Addendum waives construction and payment bonds that were
required for previous wok under the original contract agreement.
Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners approve the attached Addendum to Agreement
and authorize the Board Chairman to execute said document
ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert,
SECONDED by Commissioner Ginn, the Board
unanimously approved the Addendum to the
Agreement for Construction of an Observation
Platform at Oslo Riverfront Conservation Area,
County Project No. 7060, and authorized the
Chairman to execute same; as recommended by
staff.
ADDENDUM IS ON FILE IN THE
OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
SEPTEMBER 19 1998
-9-BOOK A' FAGE rte �
BOOK 100 PAGE 0`74
7.D. BID #9012 - ANNUAL CONTRACT FOR SLUDGE REMOVAL SERVICE -
FLORIDA SLUDGE
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of August 25, 1998:
TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
THRU: James August 25, 1998 E. Chandler, County Administrator //��
H T. "Sonny" Dean, General Services Directozoi'V
FROM Fran Boynton Powell, Purchasing Managr"
SUBJECT: Bid Award: #9012 Anmral Contract for Sludge Removal Service
Utilities Department
Bid Opening Date
August 5,1998 at 2: 00 P.M.
Advertising Dates:
July 22, 29, 1998
Specifications Mailed to:
(11) Eleven Vendors
Replies:
(1) One Vendor
"No Bid" Response:
(1) One Vendor
VENDOR_
CURIUM
IIAPi1Ti'E.S
ESTIMATED
IIAN1111F8
PRWEPER
GALLON'
BID TOTAL
Floridaffludge
Vero Beach, Fl
Vista Roval WWTP
2,451,501
Z451XI GAL
5.00875
521,450.63
South County WWTP
1.266 812 GAL
1,600000 GAL
5.00875
514,000.00
North County WWTP
926,996 GAL
000 GAL
5.00875
521,875.00
West Rexional WWTP
2,528,339 GAL
2,528,339 GAL
5.00875
522,122.97
Vista Gardens WWTP
625 GAL
625,8n GAL
5.00875
55,476.38
Blue Cypress WWTP
066,000 GAL
66,000 GAL
5.00875
5577.50
Iauoelwood WWTP
341,000 GAL
Closed
Sea Oaks WWTP
168,000 GAL
Closes!
TOTAL
9,771,712 GAL
S85,502.48
.,
3FE.41 1 ffi 6 > >::.. o1�i : `:<`<> > :><<. <> :<;
1.W3 -:
iA� �4' • L� � t t
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends the following:
• Award the bid to Florida Sludge as the sole bidder meeting specifications as set forth in the Invitation to Bid.
• Establish an Open End Contract with Florida Sludge with a not to exceed amount of $85,500.00 for the
period October 1, 1998 through September 30, 1999.
• Authorize the Purchasing Manager to renew this contract subject to satisfactory performance, zero cost
increase, vendor acceptance and the determination that renewal of this annual contract is in the best interest of
the County.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert,
SECONDED by Commissioner Ginn, the Board
unanimously awarded Bid #9012 for sludge removal
service to Florida Sludge; as recommended by staff.
BID DOCUMENTS WILL BE ON FILE IN THE
OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
WHEN EXECUTED AND RECEIVED
SEPTEMBER 1, 1998
ZE. BID #9009 - ANNUAL CONTRACT FOR SULFURICACID - JONES
CHEMICAL
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of August 25, 1998:
DATE: August 25, 1998 v
TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
THRU: James E. Chandler, County Administrator ��((���
KT. "Somuy- Dean, General Services Directac/0
FROM: Fran Boynton -Powell, Purchasing Manager
SUBJECT: Bid Award: #9009 Annual Contract for Sulfiuic Acid
Ute Department
Bid Opening Date
July 31, 1998
Advertising Date
July 20, 27, 1998
specifications Maned to:
(14) Fourteen Vendors
Replies:
(4) Four Vendors
"No Bid" Response:
(2) Two
Staff recommends the following:
• Award the bid to Jones Chemical as the overall low bidder meeting specifications as set forth
in the Invitation to Bid
• Establish an Open End Contract with Jones Chemical with a not to arcccd amount of
$40,000 for the period October 1, 1998 through September 30, 1999.
• Authorize the Purchasing Manager to renew this comtact subject to satisfactory performance,
zero cost increase, vendor acceptance and the determination that renewal of this annual
contract is in the best interest of the County.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert,
SECONDED by Commissioner Ginn, the Board
unanimously awarded Bid #9009 for sulfuric acid to
Jones Chemical; as recommended by staff.
BID DOCUMENTS WILL BE ON FILE IN THE
OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
WHEN EXECUTED AND RECEIVED
SEPTEMBER 1, 1998
-11- BOOK 100 PAGE t) 7 5
DO PAGE
Z F. BID #9010 - ANNUAL CONTRACT FOR LIO UID CHLORINE -JONES
CHEMICAL
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of August 25, 1998:
DATE: August 23, 1998
TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
7 RtU: Jams E. Chandler, County Administrator
HT. "Sones' Dean, General Services Direcct�o, w
FROM Fran Boynton -Pow rA Purchasing Manger
SUBJECT: Bid Award. #9010 Anmral Contract for Liquid/ Chlorine
Unities Depertiment
Bid Opening Date July 31, 1998
Advertising Daus: July 20, 27, 1998
specifications Maned to: (18) Eighteen Vendors
Replies: (2) Two Vendors
"No Bid" Responses (5) Five Vendors
Staff recommends the Mowing:
• Award the bid to Jones Chemical as the overall low bidder meeting specifications as set forth
in the Invitation to Bid.
• Establish an Open End Contract with Jones_ Chemical with a not to exceed amount of
580.000. for the period October 1, 1999 through Septembers 30,1999.
• Authorize the Purchasing Manager to renew this contract subject to satisfactory performance,
zero cost increase, vendor acceptance and the determination that renewal of this arcual
contract is in the best interest of the County.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert,
SECONDED by Commissioner Ginn, the Board
unanimously awarded Bid #9010 for liquid chlorine
to Jones Chemical; as recommended by staff.
- BID DOCUMENTS WILL BE ON FILE IN THE
OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
WHEN EXECUTED AND RECEIVED
SEPTEMBER 1, 1998
•
Z G.. BID #9011- ANNUAL CONTRACT FOR ANTISCALANT - AMERICAN
WATER CHEMICALS
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of August 25, 1998:
DATE: August 25, 1998
TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
THRU: Is E. Chandler, County Administrator
1
FLT. "Sonny" Dean, Cmeral SwA=
FROM: Fran Boynton -Powell, Purchasing M
SUBJECT: Bid Award: #9011 Anmral Contract for Andscalant
Utilities Department
Bid Opening Date: August 5, 1998 at 2:00 P.M.
Advertising Data: July 20, 27, 1998
Specifications Mailed to: (18) Eighteen Vendors
Replies: (6) Six Vendors
"No Bid" Response: (4) Four Vendors
Staff recommends the following:
• Award the bid to American Water Chemicals as the overall low biddy meeting specifications
as set forth in the invitation to Bid
• Establish an Open End Contract with American Water Chemicals with a not to exceed
amount of 150,,000 for the period October 1, 1998 through September 30, 1999.
• Authorize the Purcbasmg Manager to renew, this contract subject to satisfactory pert nmance,
zero cost increase, vendor acceptance and the determination that renewal of this amoral
contract is in the best interest of the Cowry.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert,
SECONDED by Commissioner Ginn, the Board
unanimously awarded Bid #9011 for antiscalant to
American Water Chemicals; as recommended by
staff.
BID DOCUMENTS WILL BE ON FILE IN THE
OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
SEPTEMBER 1, 1998
WHEN EXECUTED AND RECEIVED
-13-
0
BOOK DO FACE U"77
pr
BOOK MG PAGE 678
7.H. BID #9013 - ANNUAL CONTRACT FOR CARTRIDGE FILTERS - A.E.S..
INC -
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of August 25, 1998:
DATE: August 25, 1998
TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
THRU: James E. Chandler, Calory Administrator ,� /�
ILT. "Som' Dean, General Services Di ector�'�"'!
FROM Fun Boynton-Powell,Pmehasing Maosger
SUBJECT: Bid Award: #9013 New Aman Contract
for Cartridge Filters AMues Departmw
BACKGROUND R1►►ATION
Bid Opening Date July 31, 1998 at 2:00 PAL
Advertising Data: July 20, 27, 1998
Speaficatiorls Manned to: (25) Twenty Five Vendors
Rept: (3) Three Vendors
No Bid" Response: (8) Fight Vendors
VEIQDORTED
... :1 MIRICE
BIDTOTAL
A.E.S.
1700
54.E
$7276.00
TAMM FI
800
SSJ0
54160.00
TOTAL
SI 436.00
Ed�ds Ca
1700
SS.4S
89268.00
AWb=ff. AI
800
56.25
35000.00
TOTAL
SI 00
1700On
S1S.00
WS00.00
AWbom Fl
SW MM
519.00
514400.00
TOTAL
819 900.00
CURRENT YEAR
Eioetap=
boa& a meded dining
emnIDtbudwwa.
Prioesboevauddains
59.061
.'y8w FA Mai 1�.tl51 i i i
BEWMEMATION
Staff recommends the Mowing:
• Award the bid to A,B.S-Ine.as the overall low bidder mating specifications as set forth in the
Invitation to Bid
• Establish an Open End Contract with AY -S- Inc- a not to exceed amount of 512.000 for
the period October 1, 1998 through September 30, 1999.
• Authorize the Pmchismg Manager to renew this contract subject to satisfactory performance,
zero cost increase, vendor acceptance and the determination that renewal of this arcual
contract is in the best interest of the County.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert,
SECONDED by Commissioner Ginn, the Board
unanimously awarded Bid #9013 for cartridge filters
to A.E.S., Inc.; as recommended by staff.
BID DOCUMENTS WILL BE ON FILE IN THE
OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
WHEN EXECUTED AND RECEIVED
SEPTEMBER 1, 1998
-14-
• 0
1-1
ZL BID #8044 - COMMUNICATIONS RECORDING SYSTEMS - CANCEL
AWARD TO AXIS TRICOMm, ING AND AWARD TO COMMUNICATIONS
INTERNATIONAL
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of August 25, 1998:
DATE: August 25, 1998
TO: BOARD OF COUNTY
THRU: James E. Chandler, County Administrator
H.T. "Somiy" Dean, General Services Direct4
1`
FROM Fran Boynton -Powell, Purchasing '
SUBJECT: Re -Award of IRC Bid 08044 Communication Recording Systems
Emergency Services
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
On April 28, 1998 the Board approved the agenda item awarding the communications recording
systems to the low bidder, Arcs Tmom Inc of Munni, Florida Prior to making this
recommendation, staff sought and received additional mon and clarification from this
vendor on the proposed piece of equipment meeting the bid specifications . Refmmce checks
were conducted and this vendor received Svorable remarks from other agenaies.
Since the initial iner Matin of the new recorder for the County's 911 Dispatch Center, the system
has yet to be fidlly functional and staff has had to continue using the old logging recorder. It has
now been determined that the unit provided by Ands Tricom Inc of Miami,. Florida does riot meet
specifications as outlined in the attached correspondence. (Exhibit A). On August 17, 1998 a
change order was issued and sent by certified mail to Ards Tricom Inc canceling the purchase
order (#84150) in its entirety and requesting that the equipment be picked up. (Exhibit B)
ANS
The original Bid #8044 received responses from the following vendors:
Axis Tricom Inc, Mum, Florida $40,995.00
Dictaphone Inc.. Melba une, Florida $41,378.00
Co cations International, Vero Beach. Florida $47,000.00
Note: The unit proposed by Dictaphme does not meet the required specifications as so noted on
their response to this bid The unit proposed by Communications Imernadonal does mat aU the
specifications.
$47,000.00
551,146.00
911
120-133-519-06645
RECO ATION:
Staff recommends that the original award to Antis Tricom Inc be canceled and re -awarded to
Comanudcations International Inc as the sole bidder mating the specifications as set forth in the
Invitation to Bid.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert,
SECONDED by Commissioner Ginn, the Board
unanimously awarded Bid #8044 for communication
recording systems to Communication International,
Inc., and canceled the original award to Axis
Tricom, Inc.; as recommended by staff.
BID DOCUMENTS WILL BE ON FILE IN ,THE
OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
WHEN EXECUTED AND RECEIVED
SEPTEMBER 1, 1998
-15- BOOK PAGE G
L
BOOK iUu PAGE03G
7.1 MISCELLANEOUSBUDGETAmENDMENT #026
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of August 26, 1998:
TO: Members of the Board
of County Commissioner: DATE: August 26, 1998
SUBJECT: MISCELLANEOUS BUDGET AMENDMENT 026
CONSENT AGENDA
FROM: Joseph A. Bair
OMB Director
DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS
The attached budget amendment is to appropriate finding for the following.
1. The attached entry transfers appropriate additional funds to Fleet Management.
2. The attached entry appropriate revenue from outside agencies utilizing Fleet
Management which was not included in the budget when it was approved -
3. The Main Library has received an additional 53,405 in donations.
4. The Board of County Commissioners approved an increase in the amount of 510,000 to
the Sheriffs budget for the sale of confiscated property. The attached entry appropriates
funds.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners approve the attached budget
amendment.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert,
SECONDED by Commissioner Ginn, the Board
unanimously approved Miscellaneous Budget
Amendment #026; as recommended by staff.
TO: Members of the Board BUDGET AMENDMENT: 026
of County Commissioners
FROM: Joseph A. Baird^) DATE: August 26 1998
OMB Director
[NEntry
umber
Funds/Department/Account Name
Account Number
Increase
Decrease
1.
REVENUE
FLEET MANAGEMENT/Transfer In
501-000-381-020.00
S220.000
5o
FLEET MANAGEMENT/Auto
Maintenance
501-000-395-010.00
s0
S220.000
SEPTEMBER 1, 1998
-16-
0 0
TO: Members of the Board
of County Commissioners
FROM: Joseph A. Baird
OMB Director'
BUDGET AMENDMENT: 026
DATE: August 26.1998
7.1 RESOLUTION 98-086 -TAX CANCELLATION - SPALLONE AND KOYNOT
(ARCATE CARR
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of August 18, 1998:
SEPTEMBER 1, 1998
F • 4
-17- BOOK IN PAGE 33
EXPENSE
TRANSPORTATION/Funds
Transfer Out
111-199-581-099.21
$165,000
$0
TRANSPORTATION/Reserve for
Contingency
111-199-581-099.91
$0
$165,000
SWDD/Landfill/Ttansfer Out
411-217-534-099.21
$55,000
$0
SWDD/LandfiWCash Forward
411-217-534-099.91
$0
$55,000
2.
REVENUE
FLEET MANAGEMENT/Auto
Maintenance
501-000-395-010.00
$50,000
SO
EXPENSE
FLEET MANAGEMENT/Other
Contractual Services
501-242-591-033.49
$7,500
$0
FLEET MANAGEMENT/Parts
501-242-591-035.54
$42.500
$0
3.
REVENUE
GENERAL FUND/Donations-
Main Library
001-000-366-095.00
$3.405
$0
EXPENSE
GENERAL FUND/Main Library/Books
001-109-571-035.45
$1.555
$0
GENERAL FUND/Main Library/EDP
001-109-571-066.47
$1.850
$0
4.
REVENUE
GENERAL FUND/Sale Surplus
001-000-364-041.00
$10,000
$0
EXPENSE
GENERAL FUND/Law Enforcement
001-600-586-099.04
$10.000
$0
7.1 RESOLUTION 98-086 -TAX CANCELLATION - SPALLONE AND KOYNOT
(ARCATE CARR
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of August 18, 1998:
SEPTEMBER 1, 1998
F • 4
-17- BOOK IN PAGE 33
BOOK 100 PAGE'63- 2
TO: Board of County Commissioners
FROM: Lea R. Keller, CLA
Legal Assistant - County Attorney's Office
DATE: August 18, 1998
RE: 1 Recently Acquired Property - Tax Cancellation
The County recently acquired some property and, pursuant to Section 196.28,
F.S., the Board of County Commissioners, after formally accepting it, is allowed
to cancel and discharge any taxes owed on the portion of the property acquired
for public purpose. Such cancellation must be done by resolution with a
certified cony being forward to the Tax Collector (along with copies sent to the
Property Appraiser and Fixed Assets).
Reouested Action. Board authorize the Chairman to sign the attached
resolutions canceling taxes upon lands the County recently acquired.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert,
SECONDED by Commissioner Ginn, the Board
unanimously adopted Resolution 98-086 cancelling
certain delinquent taxes upon publicly owned lands,
pursuant to Section 196.28, Florida Statutes
(Spallone and Kovnot [Archie Carr] -
Environmentally Significant Land).
Re: Envftm mffldy Significant Lend
Spallone & Kovnot (Archie Carr)
Tax ID #14-31-39-0-20-3.0
RESOLUTION NO. 98-86
A RESOLUTION OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA,
CANCELLING CERTAIN DELINQUENT TAXES UPON
PUBLICLY OWNED LANDS, PURSUANT TO SECTION 196.28,
FLORIDA STATUTES.
WHEREAS, Section 196.28, Florida Statutes, allows the Board of County Commissioners
of each County to cancel and discharge any and all liens for taxes, delinquent or current, held or
owned by the county or the state, upon lands heretofore or hereafter conveyed to or acquired by
any agency, governmental subdivision, or municipality of the state, or the United States, for road
purposes, defense purposes, recreation, reforestation, or other public use; and
WHEREAS, such cancellation must be by resolution of the Board of County
Commissioners, duly adopted and entered upon its minutes properly describing such lands and
setting forth the public use to which the same are or will be devoted; and
WHEREAS, upon receipt of a -certified copy of such resolution, proper officials of the
county and of the state are authorized, empowered, and directed to make proper entries upon the
records to accomplish such cancellation and to do all things necessary to carry out the provisions
of Section 196.28, F.S.;
SEPTEMBER 1, 1998
-18-
Eli
0
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that:
1. The property is hereby accepted and any and all liens for taxes delinquent or current,
against the property described in OR Book _!.? (# . Page f"�-4, which was recently
acquired by Indian River County as environmentally significant land, are hereby canceled,
pursuant to the authority of Section 196.28, F.S.
2. The Clerk to the Board of County Commissioners is hereby directed to send a certified copy
of this resolution to the Tax Collector and the Property Appraiser.
The resolution was moved for adoption by Commissioner Fg y p r t . and the motion was
seconded by Commissioner r,; nn and, upon being put to a vote, the vote was as
tr,itnum•
Chairman John W. Tippin
Aye
Vice Chairman Kenneth R. Macht
Aye
Commissioner Carolyn K. Eggert
Aye
Commissioner Caroline D. Ginn
Aye
Commissioner Fran B. Adams
Aye
The Chairman thereupon declared the resolution duly passed and adopted this I day of
September, 1998. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
Barto lark
By
By; _ John W. Tip in
4ew Chairman
TAX CERTIFICATES OUTSTANDING
L--1
yes no
CURRENT PRORATED TX( RECEIVED AND $ 3�7�, mi
DEPOSITED WITH TAX COLLECTOR
W&-17-1996 1005 0 LLIM »[JWP & Q4.MELL
L ' L
5612314343 P.02/03
d.Nir.mlae
em,D. eruas4rm
adts,amq adlei ROM
WmemdiLYelO
1"01"M
e.AWN.OW 14MUOMO070ta0n�e •..
gpKn'STAdw siR
errM,w]WIlYFmL�ienW
WARRANTYDEED
TIM BOit MRT, 00lethis IA -day ad 129W, .
,��, ►
Dr. s. I. sp lme ud Arima A. spdbM bb wits, u to siar un idded om4mV kftrW (1A)
ANDRu=NhLSonmeeadCerolKo.aot,bitwife,a.mtirfrooh t(l X
or the exmtp d Ism Rbg; Oa Stele or Flmise. GRANTORS, eod
INDIAN RIVER CO< ay- FLGRIDA. s podia► ottd same of Fkdia,
.�oedd�e.sb rd.law2S�Bust.WioReci.Bb�bd.�9fo
at me Corry U&= Rim SWe or ROM16 GRAXn36
x{ 18 that do a ANTORS. far and in QCWdd retim or tine arm orTENANDW0100
DOLL.ARS(530.00)udodmrpWendvomb)aoomidneimteGRANTORSinbmip MbyORANTM
the nw*t vtmmf a bemby ealmowledptd, baa y U$4 baBpinad end sold to the odd GRANTEE and
GRANTEIrs ==am od upgo im m, 9m MaAM dumbed WA duw& biq and bmg is the
U=y of 9MIM RIvmk Suss of nORMA, to wit
Ttrtleutb308CMefftNW&00Odd C490=104 >1 K
Taembip31800b,Raap Ssabb'ro3
I SSAMIDE cVrdr8wtb200Rd*uwC 8.Wknd1y1ft=6
beioj1aIndf =RtWCatetY,FIa."
SEPTEMBER 1, 1998
-19- BOOK 100 PAGE k'33
I
=*"m tiommctmad,ifaep. aid ndyraprdty
maessubsegomtto 1997.
and the GRANTORS do hereby A* warrent the title to aid land, ad vitt dofa+d ft amfe against Laful
daima orad persua wbdomm.
IN VYI'119&9S VM=W, ft GRANTORS bxw LQamto ntthdr boo& mcd sob the dry adyar frac
Amon hm.
HLG-1'-:990 10:65 COLL-INS BROtN & CFLL4ELL
DA(, -
nn s 1. Spauo
Arkne A. Spa! _
Aaareau v
rI'A'►j��•�
I
5612314343 P.03/03
v
STATE OF FLORIDA
COUNTY OF INDIAN RrM
pe afomgoiag matt mod was sdmowledged bebre me this J day of
1998 by Dr. L Spallons and Arkne A. SpaIIoae, hi w wif who ars
ddW () p rally Imoam to aro or (Iwbo produesd a Florida Driver's id cation
(Nomy Sao
Name Pridtad~
My ComaaadoaBx*=
ab YheKV4"
µrutarsmaaemu WON
STATE OF FLORIDAs�noia.aea we
COUNTY OF . 3�r
—
The atbregoing iasteument was ackaawledged before me thin day of
1998 by Ronald 11iC. Kovawt sad Grol KovwW6 his wife, who are either
(AilRooffaDy kw m to me or ( ) who produced a Florida driver's licams as identdkad a
(Notary Sean
SEPTEMBER 1, 1998
•
-20—
NotuyNbUc. StatePkttida-
Name Primed: CAileleC RRaAD
My Commm mEsphu
>P� vy sAaoua Aaoaro
aaenma �eww
P oeuaaao
arm
BOOK JO
0
ZL. BLA%EANn TORREs v. INDLwRivER CoumT
The Board reviewed a Memorandum ofAugust 20, 1998:
TO: Board of Countv Commissioners
FROMTerrence P. O'Brien, Assistant County Attorney
DATE: August 20, 1998
SUBJECT: Blake 8; Torres v. Indian River County
The County is a defendant in an inverse condemnation lawsuit brought by the
owners of property located on the northwest corner of Oslo Road and Old Dixie
Highway. During the course of construction of improvements to the
intersection at Oslo and Old Dixie, a storm sewer manhole and a force main
were installed several feet into the Blake and Torres property. This established
the basis for an inverse condemnation law suit which also includes a plea for
damages for the loss of access to Oslo Road.
The County made an offer of judgment for $20,000 to settle the lawsuit. This
was rejected. Blake & Torres made an offer to settle for $45,000 which the
County rejected. Through negotiations, Blake & Torres have reduced the
settlement figure to $35,000.00 plus costs. Costs are approximately $3,100.0u.
Attorney fees will be the subject of a separate court action. Inverse
condemnation, like condemnation, results in the County paving for experts,
costs and the like for the Plaintiffs if they prevail and in this case there has
been a taking. This can result in high costs to the County, for example, the
price we have received from our appraiser to 1) determine the value of the
property taken and 2) the value of the tract before and after the taking is
S10.000.
In view of the foregoing, it is recommended that the Board approve the
attached joint stipulation which will settle the case except for attorney fees.
Commissioner Adams wanted to confirm that this settlement agreement does not cover
attorney fees, and Assistant County Attorney Terry O'Brien confirmed that understanding.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams,
SECONDED by Commissioner Eggert, the Board
unanimously approved the Joint Stipulation with
Glenn M. Blake and Frances Pace Blake, his wife,
and Terry T. Torres and Mary S. Torres, his wife,
settling Case No. 97 -0228 -CA -05 except for attorney
fees; as recommended by staff.
SEPTEMBER 1, 1998
-21- BOOK JLOG PAGE l0`3
BOOK M PAGE6706
Z.M. SHERIFF - BUDGET ADJUSTMENT OF $92.005 - INMATE HOUSING -
JULY. 1998
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of August 25, 1998:
�
t�eriff
GARY C. WHEELER • INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
MEMBER FLORIDA SHERIFFS* ASSOCIATION
MEMBER OF NATIONAL SHERIFFS' ASSOCIATION
4055 41st AVENUE VERO BEACH. FLORIDA 32980.1808 PHONE (561) 569-670:
August 25, 1998
The Honorable John W. Tippin, Chairman �• �s .
Board of County Commissioners -
Indian River County_
1840 25th Street `
Vero Beach, FL 32960-3394 "
Re: Budget Adjustment
Dear Mr. Tippin:
This letter is a request to amend our fiscal year 1997-98 Operating Budget by $92,005. These funds
represent the revenue generated from the housing of Broward County inmates ($39,050) and Polk
County inmates ($52,955) for the month of July, 1998. The monies will replace Corrections' funds used
to house the inmates and purchase Capital Outlay items.
The budget amendment will be distributed as follows:
Law Enforcement Capital:
(2) Full Size Sedan @ $19,979 $ 39,958
(32) Light Bars (Replacement) @ $586 18,752
Corrections Expense: 33,345
Total $ _92.055
I am requesting this item be placed on the "Consent Agenda" at your earliest convenience.
If you have any questions or any further information is required, please let me know.
Sincerely,
Gary C. Wheeler. Sheriff
ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert,
SECONDED by Commissioner Ginn, the Board
unanimously approved the amendment to the
Sheriff's fiscal year 1997-98 Operating Budget by
$92,005 representing the revenue generated from the
housing of Broward County inmate ($39,-050) and
Polk County inmates ($52,955) for the month of
July, 1998; as recommended by the Sheriff.
SEPTEMBER 1, 1998
•
ZN.. SHERIFF- BUDGETADJUSTMENT OF $248.000 -INMATE HOUSING=
AUGUSTANDSEPTEMBER.1998 -
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of August 25, 1998:
GARY C. WHEELER • INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
4055 41 st AVENUE VERO BEACH. FLORIDA 32960.1808 PHONE (561) 569-670'
August 25. 1998
The Honorable John W. Tippin. Chairman
Board of County Commissioners
Indian River County
1840 25th Street
Vero Beach. FL 32960-3394
Re: Budget Adjustment
Dear Mr. Tippin:
:►s sr
This letter is a request to amend our fiscal year 1997-98 Operating Budget by $248.000. These funds
represent the revenue which will be generated from the housing of Broward County inmates ($67,100)
and Polk County inmates ($85,400) for the months of August and September, 1998. Also included is
$95.500 in revenue from the housing of Federal Prisoners above the projected revenue in our 1997-98
Budget Request. The monies will replace Corrections' funds used to house the inmates and purchase
Capital Outlay and Expense items.
The budget amendment will be distributed as follows:
Law Enforcement:
Tilt Bed Utility Truck
$ 28.000
(4) Light Bar Replacements ng. $586
2.380
Vehicle Cage Replacements
2,736
(12) Electronic Shotgun Racks @ $204
2.448
(12) Handheld Radios c(_t. $2:299
27.588
(7) Mobile Radios @a, $2,700
18,900
Copy Machine, Uniform Division
13,594
LCD Projector (Training)
4,500
E.R.T. Equipment
8.000
Handcuffs. Shell Holders. Slings
8.972
Computer Upgrades (RMS System)
38,160
Computer Upgrades
12.898
Hunter Front End Alignment Eqpt.
10-566
Hydraulic Service Lift
3.325
Generator/AC Unit Command Post
998
Corrections:
High Pressure Washer(Bldg. Maint)
1.000
Corrections Expense:
63.935
Total
$164
4 WV
0*1
at'--Ed
The 173rd Internationally Accredited Law Enforcement Agency
Accredited by the Commission on Accrnditation for Law Enforcement Agencies, incorporated u
SEPTEMBER 1, 1998
-23-
•
BOOK 106 PAGE U"37
BOOK iO G PAGE ' J
We appeared before you earlier in the year when we were notified by Broward County of their intention to
scale back the number of inmates being sent to us. At that meeting we informed you the revenue from
Federal Prisoners was exceeding expectations and asked to use any surplus to offset the Broward shortfall.
Your instructions were to resubmit our request after the Federal Prisoner revenue budget had been met.
As of the end of Julv we have generated $505.900 in Federal Revenue which exceeds the $49.750
included in the 1997-98 Budget.
The attached worksheet details the anticipated revenue from the housing of out -of -county prisoners and
amounts received to date. As you will note we will still have a revenue shortfall of $330.2.15 even after
you allow us to use the $95.500 in Federal Prisoner revenue.
- I am requesting this item be placed on the "Consent Agenda" at your earliest convenience.
If you have any questions or any further information
is required, please let me know.
Sincerely.
0
Gary C. Wheeler, Sheriff
Indian River County Sheriff's Office
Out-of-County/Federal Prisoner Revenue
Fiscal Year 1997-98
Out -Of -County
Federal
Prisoners
Prisoners
Actual Revenue:
October, 97
$131,310
33,345
November, 97
115,920
40,230
December, 97
126,555
50,940
January, 98
101,310
48,780
February, 98
105,050
54,315
March, 98
55,990
61,380
April, 98
29,285
51,615
May, 98
65,980
55,485
June, 98
93,055
53,830
July, 98
92,005
55,980
Total Actual
$916,460
$505,900
Projected: 8-01-98 thru 9-30-98
August, 98
Federal Government
Broward
Polk
September, 98
Federal Government
Broward
Polk
Total Projected
Total Revenue
Revenue Budgeted In 1997-98 Budget
Federal Revenue Surplus
Total Revenue Available To Sheriffs Office
Anticipated 1997-98 Housing of County Prisoner Revenue
Revenue Shortfall
SEPTEMBER 1, 1998
$34,100
43,400
41,850
40,500
33,000
42,000
$152,500 $82,350
$1,068,960 $588,250
$492,750
$1,164,460
1,494,675
($330,215)
$95,500
Commissioner Ginn wanted to be sure- that the vote is to use the $95,500 federal
revenue surplus noted on Page 100 of the backup, and Sheriff's Comptroller Richard Dees
confirmed that the projected income from the housing of federal prisoners was $492,000
which was surpassed in July of this year by $95,500.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert,
SECONDED by Commissioner Ginn, the Board
unanimously approved the Sheriff's amendment to
the fiscal year 1997-98 Operating Budget by
$248,000 representing the revenue to be generated
from the housing of Broward County inmate
($67,100) and Polk County inmates ($85,400) forthe
months of August and September, 1998; as well of
$95,500 in revenue from the housing of Federal
Prisoners above the projected revenue; as
recommended by the Sheriff.
9.A.1. PUBLIC HEARING - ORDINANCE 98-020 AMENDING
THE ZONING ORDINANCE AND THE
NORTH BARRIER ISLAND BETWEEN THE EXISTING
ISLAND CLUB SUBDIVISION AND THE INDIAN RIVER
LAGOON (ORCHID PLACE - BEAZER HOMES) -
QUASI-JUDICIAL
SEPTEMBER 1, 1998
-25- BOOK 100 PAGE O3 S
Pubashed Dally
Vero Beach, Indian Wer County, Florida
CDU14TY OF I>4DIAN RPAM STATE OF FLORIDA
Before the undersigned oa>ha Pres ofof the hpersonalty
personalty appeared Darryl K. Hicks who an
h hxlien River C,ounty�.t that the a copya � p at Vero Beech
WLFOVKIi IMt%!%aT1___�
N the Court, was pub-
fthed In said newspaper in the Im we of .! /
Affiant further says that the said preSS,lqunai Is a newspaper publighad at Vero Beach, in
said Indian Rim County, Fiarida, and that the said
aria mart at a continuously published In said IndlanFir Q°'mt)'. Fl rift W � been ed heretofore '
an
for a period othe fM publication of the attached copy of
f one P� otfioe h Vero Beach, in said ham Rivar County. Florida,
�$ and afftantfurtl r sways #0 he paid
any
or refund for the ppose ofg firm
forp i this
if subsCrfbed before
••OapA STgaC••• �`/I)
• ...,.cte11E1NtEi ��'s
� M1 Cy80sCt ilt,1��3 ; o =
• � 9'cce : g' _
:0a�.,�.
SEPTEMBER 1, 1998
BOOK iN PAGE UJO
Notary Faille, Sx& Florida
My Commissionn I�TJ3/QL 2
Corton. No. CC 811
Pereonaliy Known or Produt
Tye of ID Produced .
NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING
The Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida,
will consider the adoption of a county ordinance rezoning land within
the unincorporated portions of Indian River County. The subject property
is owned by Orchid Place, LTD. A public hearing at which parties in
interest and citizens shall have an opportunity to be heard, will be held
on Tuesday, August 25, 1998 at 9:05 a.m. in the County Commission
Chambers of the County Administration Building, located at 1840 25th
Street Vero Beach, Florida. The proposed ordinance to rezone the
subject properties is entitled:
AN ORDINANCE OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AMENDING
THE ZONING ORDINANCE AND THE ACCOMPANYING ZONING
MAP FOR +-48.9 ACRES LOCATED BETWEEN THE EXISTING ISLAND
CLUB SUBDIVISION AND THE INDIAN RIVER LAGOON, FROM +.
48.9 ACRES OF A-1, AGRICULTURAL DISTRICT (UP TO 1 UNIT/5
ACRES), TO +-11.2 ACRES OF RM -6, MULTIPLE -FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
DISTRICT (UP TO 6 UNITS/ACRE) AND +-37.7 ACRES OF RS -6,
SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (UP TO 6 UNITS/ACRE), AND
PROVIDING CODIFICATION, SEVERABILITY, AND EFFECTIVE DATE.
The rezoning application may be inspected by the public at the
Community Development Department located on the second floor of the
County Administration Building located at 1840 25th Street Vero Beach,
Florida, between the hours of 8:30 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. on weekdays. For
more information, contact John Wachtel at (561) 567-8000, extension
247.
The proposed ordinance may be inspected by the public between
8:30 am. and 5:00 p.m. at the office of the Clerk to the Board of County
Commissioners, 1840 25th Street, Vero Beach, Florida.
The Board of County Commissioners may adopt another zoning dis-
trict, other than the district requested, provided that the district Is consis-
tent with the county's comprehensive plan.
Anyone who may wish to appeal any decision which may be made at
this meeting will need Jo ensure that a verbatim record of the proceed-
ings is made, which includes the testimony and evidence upon which the
appeal is based
Anygrre who needs a special accommodation for this meeting must
contact the county's Americans with Disabilities (ADA) Coordinator at
(561) 567-8000, extension 223 at least 48 hours in advance of the
meeting.
Indian River County
Board of County Commissioners
By.-s•John W. Tippin, Chairman
August 12, 1998 1409592r
i
0 49
•
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of August 25, 1998:
TO: James E. Chandler
County Administrator
D TMENT HEAD CONCURRENCE
obert M. -Keating, P
THROUGH: Sasan Rohaui, AICP S -
Chief, Long -Range Planning
FROM: John Wachtel A
Senior Planner, Long -Range Planning
DATE: August 25, 1998
RE: ORCHID PLACE, LTD'S REQUEST TO REZONE 111.2 ACRES FROM A-1
TO RM -6 AND 137.7 ACRES FROM A-1 TO RS -6 (RZON 98-06-0002)
It is requested that the data herein presented be given formal consideration by the Board of Countv
Commissioners at its regular meeting of September 1, 1998.
This is a request to rezone ±48.9 acres located on the north barrier island, between the existing Island
Club Subdivision and the Indian River Lagoon. The entire ±48.9 acre subject property is currently
zoned A-1, Agricultural District (up to 1 unit/5 acres). As depicted on Attachment 2, the request
involves rezoning ±37.7 acres to RS -6, Single -Family Residential District (up to 6 units/acre) and
=11.2 acres to RM -6, Multiple -Family Residential District (up to 6 units/acre).
Generally, the portion of the site proposed to be rezoned to RM -6 is located on the western one-third
of the site. More specifically, the area proposed for RM -6 zoning is setback 100 feet from the
subject property's southern boundary and 25 feet from the subject property's northern boundary.
Additionally, the area proposed for RM -6 zoning is setback 80 feet from Jungle Trail.
The purpose of this request is to secure the necessary zoning to expand the existing Island Club
subdivision with single- and multiple -family uses.
On July 23, 1998, the Planning and Zoning Commission voted 4 to 0 to recommend that the Board
Of County Commissioners rezone the entire subject property to RS -6. Thus, the portion of the
request involving rezoning ±11.2 acres to RM -6 failed. Consistent with county land development
regulations, rezoning requests are forwarded to the Board only when the request receives a favorable
recommendation from the Planning and Zoning Commission or when the applicant files an appeal
within 15 days. In this case, the applicant filed the rezoning appeal within the necessary time period.
Subsequently, the request was scheduled to be considered by the Board of County Commissioners
at a public hearing on August 25, 1998. At that public hearing, the applicant requested that the
public hearing be continued to September 1, 1998 to allow the property owner (who was out of town
on August 25, 1998) to testify. The Board voted 5 to 0 to continue the public hearing, as requested.
Zoned A-1, the subject property consists primarily of citrus groves. The exception is the western
portion of the site, along the edge of the Indian River Lagoon. That part of the subject property
contains a portion ofJungle Trail, a county designated Scenic and Historic Road. In this area, most
of Jungle Trail is bounded on both sides by environmentally sensitive and environmentally important
habitat such as mangroves, estuarine wetlands, and tropical hammock.
A-1 zoned citrus groves abut the subject property's north boundary. Those groves extend as much
as 500 feet from the subject property. North of those groves, land is zoned RM -6 and contains 1 or
2 single-family houses, the four unit Jungle Cove apartment complex, and more than 100 acres of
environmentally important tropical maritime hammock.
SEPTEMBER 1, 1998
•
-27-BOOK .0 PAG- kii-L
BOOKNO � � `°l
PAGE bac
Most of the land containing the tropical hammock was purchased jointly by the state and the county
for conservation purposes. Funds for the county's portion of the purchase came from its
Environmental Lands Acquisition Program, while state funds came from the state Conservation and
Recreation Lands (CARL) program. Although that land was referred to as the Cairns Tract at the
time it was purchased, it is now known as the Jungle Trail Conservation Area. In the future, the
county plans to rezone the Jungle Trail Conservation Area to Con -1, Public Lands Conservation
District (zero density).
Notch of the Jungle Trail Conservation Area are several residential developments with both single -
and multiple -family units. Those developments and all land north to CR 510 are zoned RM -6.
Land abutting the subject property on the south is within the boundaries of the Town of Indian River
Shores. That land is zoned RIA, Single -Family Residential (up to 2.5 unitstacre) and contains the
Marbrisa subdivision of single-family residences. The RS -6 zoned Island Club subdivision of
single-family residences abuts the subject property on the east, and the Indian River Lagoon abuts
the subject property on the west.
Future Land I Jse Pattern
The subject property and adjacent properties to the north and east are designated L-2, Low -Density
Residential -2, on the county future land use map. The L-2 designation permits residential uses with
densities up to 6 unitstacre.
The Jungle Trail Conservation Area is designated C-1, Publicly Owned or Controlled Conservation -
1 (zero density), on the county future land use map. The C-1 designation permits conservation and
recreational uses.
South of the subject property, land is designated Low Density Residential, LD, on the Town of
Indian River Shores' future land use map. The LD designation permits residential uses with
densities up to 3 unitsiacre.
Environment
Being a citrus grove, most of the site is disturbed and has no environmental significance. The
western portion of the site, however, contains environmentally sensitive and environmentally
important habitat such as mangroves, estuarine wetlands, and tropical hammock. The subject
property is within an "AE" 100 year floodplain, with a minimum base flood elevation requirement
ranging from seven to nine feet NGVD.
The site is within the Urban Service Area of the county. Wastewater collection lines extend to the
subject property from the North County Wastewater Treatment Plant. Although the site is located
within the North County Water Service Area, water lines from the South County Reverse Osmosis
Plant extend to the site. When the North County Reverse Osmosis Plant, which is currently
undergoing final testing, becomes operational, the site will be served primarily by that plant.
The subject property can be accessed from SR AlA, via the existing Island Club subdivision.
Although the site is adjacent to Jungle Trail, automobile access to the site from Jungle Trail is
prohibited. SR AIA is a two-lane road with approximately 100 feet of public road right-of-way.
The segment of SR AIA that would serve the subject property is classified as an urban minor arterial
road on the future roadway thoroughfare plan map and is programmed for expansion to 120 feet of
public road right-of-way by 2020.
Jungle Trail is a two-lane, unpaved, local road that has been designated by the county as an historic
and scenic road with special building setbacks and vegetation protection areas along its entire length.
Although the county has a forty foot wide public road right-of-way for this segment of Jungle Trail,
the actual width of the traveled way ranges from eight feet to twenty-two feet.
In this section, an analysis of the reasonableness of the request will be presented. Specifically, this
section will include: - -
• an analysis of the request's impact on public facilities;
• an analysis of the request's compatibility with the surrounding area;
• an analysis of the request's consistency with the county's comprehensive plan; and
• an analysis of the request's potential impact on environmental quality.
SEPTEMBER 1, 1998
This site is located within the county Urban Service Area, an area deemed suited for urban scale
development. The Comprehensive Plan establishes standards for: Transportation, Potable Water.
Wastewater, Solid Waste, Drainage and Recreation. The adequate provision of these services is
necessary to ensure the continued quality of life enjoyed by the community. The Comprehensive
Plan and Land Development Regulations also require that new development be reviewed to ensure
that the minimum acceptable standards for these services and facilities are maintained.
Policy 3.2 of the Future Land Use Element states that no development shall be approved unless it
is consistent with the concurrency management system component of the Capital Improvements
Element. For rezoning requests, conditional concurrency review is required.
Conditional concurrency review examines the available capacity of each facility with respect to a
proposed project. Since rezoning requests are not projects, county regulations call for the
concurrency review to be based on the most intense use of the subject property based on the
requested zoning district.
The site information used for the concurrency analysis is as follows:
1. Size of Area to be Rezoned: *48.9 acres
2. Existing Zoning District: A-1, Agricultural District (up to 1 unit/5 acres)
3. Proposed Zoning District:
4. Most Intense Use of Subject
Property under Existing
Zoning District:
5. Most Intense Use of Subject
Property under Proposed
Zoning District:
- Transportation
RS -6, Single -Family Residential District (up to 6 uints/
acres) for :37.7 acres and RM -6, Multiple -Family
Residential District (up to 6 units/acre) for *11Z acres
9 single-family units
293 single-family units
As part of the concurrency review process, the applicant has submitted a Traffic Impact Analvsis
(TIA). The county's Traffic Engineering Division has reviewed and approved that TIA. A TIA
reports the number of peak hour/peak seasowpeak direction trips that would be generated by the
most intense use of the subject property under the proposed zoning district, and assigns those trips
to impacted roads. Impacted roads are defined in section 910.09(4)(b)3 of the county's LDRs as
roadway segments which receive five percent (5%) or more of the project traffic or fifty (50) or more
project trips, whichever is less.
According to the approved TIA, the existing level of service on impacted roadways would not be
lowered by the traffic generated by development of 293 single-family units on the subject property.
- Water
Centralized potable water service is available to the subject property from the South County Reverse
Osmosis Plant. With the most intense use allowed under the proposed rezoning, the subject property
will have a water consumption rate of 293 Equivalent Residential Units (ERU), or 73.250
gallons/day. This is based upon a level of service standard of250 gallons/ERU/day. Since the South
County Reverse Osmosis Plant currently has a remaining capacity of approximately 1.800.000
gallons/day, the plant can accommodate the additional demand generated by the proposed zoning.
When the North County Reverse Osmosis Plant is operating, the subject property will be served
primarily by that plant. Since the North County Plant has capacity for approximately 2.000,000
gallons/day, that plant also can accommodate the additional demand generated by the proposed
zoning.
- Wastewater
Centralized wastewater service is available to the subject property from the North Countv
Wastewater Treatment Plant. If a 293 unit residential project on the site connected to the regional
sewer system, that project would have a wastewater generation rate of 293 Equivalent Residential
Units (ERU), or 73,250 gallonstday. This is based upon a level of service standard of 250
gallons/ERU/day. Since the North County Wastewater Treatment Plant currently has a remaining
capacity of approximately 816,000 gallons/day, the plant can accommodate the additional demand
generated by the proposed zoning.
SEPTEMBER 1, 1998
-29- anOK 0 FnUF �
BOOK j O F�1GE p)
- Solid Waste
Solid waste service includes pick-up by private operators and disposal at the county landfill. The
county's adopted level of service standard for landfill capacity is 1.97 cubic yards/person/year. With
the county's average of approximately 2.3 personsiunit, a 293 unit residential development would
be anticipated to house approximately 674 people (2.3 X 293). For the subject request to meet the
county's adopted level of service standard of 1.97 cubic yards/person/year, the landfill must have
enough capacity to accommodate approximately 1,328 (674 X 1.97) cubic yardsryear.
A review of the solid waste capacity for the active segment of the county landfill indicates the
availability of more than 830,000 cubic yards. The active segment of the landfill has a 1 year
capacity, and the landfill has expansion capacity beyond 2010. Based on the analysis, staff
determined that the county landfill can accommodate the additional solid waste generated by the site
under the proposed zoning district.
- Drainage
All developments are reviewed for compliance with county stormwater regulations which require
on-site retention, preservation of floodplain storage and minimum finished floor elevations. In
addition, development proposals must meet the discharge requirements of the county Stormwater
Management Ordinance. Any development on the subject property will be prohibited from
discharging any runoff in excess of the pre -development rate.
In this case, the minimum floor elevation level of service standard applies, since the property lies
within an AE flood zone, as designated on the Federal Emergency Management Agency's Flood
Insurance Rate Map. Consistent with Stormwater Management Sub -Element Policy 1.2 and section
930.07(2) of the county's LDRs, any new buildings constructed within an AE flood zone "must be
elevated a minimum of six inches above the base flood level." Since the subject property lies within
Flood Zone AE -9, any development on this property must have a minimum finished floor elevation
of no less than 9.5 feet above mean sea level.
Besides the minimum elevation requirement, on-site retention and discharge standards also apply
to this request. With the most intense use of this site, the maximum area of impervious surface under
the proposed zoning classifications will be approximately 1,278,050 square feet, or 29.34 acres. The
estimated runoff volume, based on that amount of impervious surface and the 25 year/24 hour design
storm, will be approximately 1,405,912 cubic feet. In order to maintain the county's adopted level
of service, the applicant will be required to retain approximately 344,275 cubic feet of runoff on-site.
With the soil characteristics of the subject property, it is estimated that the pre -development runoff
rate is 230.41 cubic feet/second.
Based upon staffs analysis, the drainage level of service standards will be met by limiting off-site
discharge to its pre -development rate of 230.41 cubic feet/second, requiring retention of 344.27
cubic feet of runoff for the most intense use of the property, and requiring that all finished floor
elevations exceed 9.5 feet above mean sea level.
As with all development, a more detailed review will be conducted during the development approval
process.
- Recreation
A review of county recreation facilities and the projected demand that would result from the most
intense development that could occur on the property under the proposed zoning classification
indicates that the adopted levels of service would be maintained The table below illustrates the
additional park demand associated with the proposed development of the property and the existing
surplus acreage.
Park Information
LOS (Acres per 1,000 Population)
Project Demand (Acres)
1
Surplus Acreage
4.0
2.70
838.5
Based on the analysis conducted, staff has determined that all concurrency -mandated facilities,
including drainage, roads, solid waste, recreation, water, and wastewater, have adequate capacity to
accommodate the most intense use of the subject property under the proposed zoning district.
Therefore. the concurrency test has been satisfied for the subject request.
Rezoning requests are reviewed for consistency with all policies of the comprehensive plan.
Rezoning requests must also be consistent with the overall designation of land uses as depicted on
the Future Land Use Map, which includes agricultural, residential, recreational, conservation. and
commercial and industrial land uses and their densities. Commercial and industrial land uses are
located in nodes throughout the unincorporated areas of Indian River County.
SEPTEMBER 1. 1998
•
The goals, objectives and policies are the most important parts of the comprehensive plan. Policies
are statements in the plan which identify the actions which the county will take in order to direct the
community's development. As courses of action committed to by the county, policies provide the
basis for all county land development related decisions. While all comprehensive plan policies are
important, some have more applicability than others in reviewing rezoning requests. Of particular
applicability for this request are Future Land Use Element Policies 1.11 and 1.12.
- Future Land Use Element Policies 1.11 and 1.12
Future Land Use Element Policy 1.11 states that the L-2, Low -Density Residential -2, land use
designation is intended for residential uses with densities up to six unitsiacre. In addition, that policy
states that those residential uses must be located within an existing or future urban service area.
Future Land Use Element Policy 1.12 specifically allows both single- and multiple -family residential
development with densities up to six unitsiacre within the L-2 land use category.
Because the subject property is located within an area designated as L-2 on the county's future land
use plan trap and is located within the county's urban service area, and the proposed zoning districts
would permit residential uses no denser than six unitstacre, the proposed request is consistent with
Future Land Use Element Policies 1.11 and 1.12.
While Future Land Use Element Policies 1.11 and 1.12 are particularly applicable to this request.
other comprehensive plan policies and objectives also have relevance. For that reason, staff
evaluated the subject request for consistency with all plan policies and objectives. Based upon that
analysis, staff determined that the request is consistent with the comprehensive plan.
For the subject property, environmental issues focus on the site's western portion, an area bisected
by Jungle Trail. The rest of the site, being a citrus grove, has been disturbed and is not
environmentally significant. The Jungle Trail area, however, contains mangroves, estuarine
wetlands, and tropical hammock upland habitat. The County's adopted Jungle Trail Management
Plan provides some protection to those habitats. That plan established a thirty foot wide protected
area on both sides of Jungle Trail. Within that protected area. activities that may disturb plants or
animals are severely restricted.
Beyond the protected area, mangrove and wetland protection regulations are the same for both the
agricultural and the residential zoning districts. Within residential zoning districts, however. there
are more likely to be requests to build docks or marinas. Such docks or ma„mas would have to meet
all applicable county, state, and federal permitting requirements.
In contrast to mangrove and wetland regulations, protection of the tropical hammock habitat differs
between the agricultural and residential zoning districts. While residential development is subject
to the county's 10-15% native upland plant community preservation requirement, agricultural uses
are exempt from that requirement. For these reasons. no significant adverse environmental impacts
associated with this request are anticipated.
Although currently zoned and used for agriculture, the subject property is anticipated to eventually
be converted to residential uses. That fact is reflected in the subject property's residential fimnue land
use designation. StaiTs position is that developing the entire site with single-family uses would
ensure that potential incompatibilities are minimi ce Since the established development pattern of
the area surrounding the subject property is single-family and since single-family is the exclusive
use of the area south of the Jungle Trail Conservation Area to Old Winter Beach Road and west of
SR AIA, except for the Baytree condominiums adjacent to SR AIA, the RS -6, single-family, zoning
district would be more consistent with the existing development pattern in the area than the proposed
RM -6 zoning.
While single-family and multiple -family are different uses, they are within the overall residential use
category. Generally, multiple -family buildings are taller and bulkier, and concentrate activities (such
as parking and recreation) to a greater degree than single-family buildings. These differences,
however, are not as significant as those between residential and commercial. In fact, multiple -family
is often a transitional use, providing a buffer between more intense commercial uses or heavily
traveled roadways and adjacent single-family areas.
When well designed, multiple -family and single-family uses can complement each other and provide
a diversity of residential options for the community. Through the Planned Development (PD)
process, multiple -family uses can be compatibly integrated with single-family uses within a
residential development project. In this case, staff encouraged the applicant to use the planned
development option for the development of the subject property.
SEPTEMBER 1, 1998
0
-31- BOOK 10 0 FACF 3).i;5
n �`0-)CI
BOOP( IOU PAGE d"Ju
The PD process requires the applicant to submit a binding conceptual plan which limits uses and sets
forth specific development standards on the site. Those standards can include landscaping, buffers.
lot size, building design, and others. Thus, the PD process allows the creation of a unique PD zoning
district to be developed specifically for each site. Through the use of the PD process, the county can
review actual site design standards, and therefore better ensure compatibility among different uses.
Because single-family areas are easily impacted, this is particularly important where single-family
area abut other uses.
By placing the RM-6/RS-6 zoning district boundary 80 feet east of Jungle Trail and 100 feet north
of the subject property's south boundary, the applicant has only partially addressed, not eliminated,
the compatibility issues raised in this section. Those issues could be better addressed through the PD
process. The applicant, however, has chosen not to take advantage of that option at this time.
Therefore, based on the analysis of the existing development pattern surrounding the subject
property, the proposed rezoning, as structured, appears to be incompatible with surrounding areas.
ALIT:RNATTWS4
With respect to this request, the Board of County Commissioners has the following three
alternatives:
1. rezone the subject property from A-1 to RS -6 and RM -6 as requested by the applicant. Staff
does not support this alternative;
2. deny the request and let the subject property remain zoned A-1. This alternative is not
consistent with the subject property's residential future land use map designation. Staff does
not support this alternative; or
3. rezone the entire subject property from A-1 to RS -6. Staff supports this alternative.
Residential zoning on the subject property is consistent with the comprehensive plan. meets all
concurrency criteria, and will have no negative impacts on environmental quality. The development
pattern in this area of the county, however, indicates that only single-family zoning on the entire site
can ensure compatibility with the surrounding areas. For these reasons, staff supports Alternative
3.
Based on the analysis, staff and the Planning and Zoning Commission recommend that the Board
of County Commissioners approve Alternative 3 and rezone the entire subject property to RS -6 by
adopting the appropriate attached rezoning ordinance.
SEPTEMBER 1, 1998
-32-
• 0
y
�O
00
W
W
f3
I ;
I RM -6
I ! I
GOV. I_OT 10 GOV. LOT II GOV. LOT 3
I RM -6 �.
' ` I
093-16
1
\ �\ PROPOSED REZONING
\\ ® A-1 TO RS -6
El A-1 TO RM -6
-atnr^ 1
ac
f RS -6
M
GO
.86 a ISLAND CLUBClb
� y:.. ,. ,, _ ° .• o � r
I 'N tt °e.Y .Nth \ •1 ...
\UKun Nwer Unoles _ to _• en I1
V. LOT \10
%�\�
� .. GOV. LOT 3 I � �` •,� � � �
,� 7D •-- - - - - GOV. LOT 3 GbY. LOT 4
` ••,'• • '.A �: �. '�. _' vl•s rlu it .y /.� .. ` • ru p �..
Vo
ISLAND 1 1, v.
,f • �`� 'y I I \, s�Qtt i INDIAN TRAILS t 1
154 AWtt
* I
•
County Attorney Vitunac noted that since a court reporter was present, anyone who
may wish to offer testimony should be sworn. He asked everyone considering testifying to
stand and raise their right hand. After swearing the proposed witnesses, he asked that they
note before speaking that they have been sworn.
Community Development Director Bob Keating noted this is a continuation of a
public hearing on a rezoning which was scheduled for last week's meeting and postponed
until today. The applicant has requested a rezoning of ±37.7 acres from A-1 to RS -6, single-
family residential, 6 units per acre. The applicant has requested that the other ±11.2 acres
be rezoned from A-1 to RM -6, multi -family. The Planning & Zoning Commission
recommended that the entire parcel be rezoned to RS -6 and denied the applicant's request
for the RM -6 zoning. The applicant is appealing that decision. Staff's position is that the
single-family zoning would avoid any potential incompatibility that might occur and staff is
recommending Alternate 3.
Commissioner Ginn asked whether access to the project would be only from AIA, and
Director Keating responded that access on Jungle Trail would be prohibited.
The Chairman opened the public hearing and asked if anyone wished to be heard
regarding this matter.
Scott McGuire, President of Knight McGuire & Associates, advised that he is
representing the applicant, Beazer Homes. He pointed out that this is not a density issue and
that the request meets all the criteria. The applicant is requesting that Alternate 1 be
approved. If compatibility is the question, they have pulled the multi -family away from
Jungle Trail and away from the Marbrisa development.
CommissionerAdams questioned whether the buffer and setbacks onthe multi -family
zoning would include garages, and Mr. McGuire responded that he is only allowed to discuss
what is before the Board today.
Mr. McGuire noted that he had been sworn in response to a question by County
Attorney Vitunac.
Michael Thorpe, 565 Graytwig Road, Vero Beach, a real estate broker, was sworn
in by County Attorney Vitunac, and continued that a lot of people want a maintenance -free
or simple life style and that a larger product is very much in demand. He believed that the
people not being represented today would be newcomers to the area. He felt, from an
aesthetic point of view, that condominiums are preferable to single-family development.
SEPTEMBER 1, 1998
�-34-
�
Anne Anderson, 945 Island Club Place, Vero Beach, presented a letter in support of
the applicant's request, signed by most residents of Island Club development. She also noted
that she had been sworn.
Robert Cairns, 1700 Ocean Drive, Vero Beach, had been sworn in. He is a general
partner in Orchid Place, Ltd. and is shocked that multi -family zoning is a concern. He also
supported the applicant's request.
Attorney Bruce Barkett, 756 Beachland Boulevard, Vero Beach, noted he has been
sworn and advised that he represents the Marbrisa Property Owners' Association. His clients
believe the Island Club development is a high quality development but agree that the multi-
family zoning requested by the applicant would not be compatible with the area. He noted
that the Board does not as yet know what the proposed project will be and his clients feel
that this is not the place for multi -family but agreed that the potential for incompatibility
would be reduced by a PD application should the applicant chose to file such an application.
Robert Solie had been sworn and believed that everyone who has spoken has a
financial interest in the project. He supported staff's recommendation.
John Butcher, 700 Marbrisa River Lane, Vero Beach, had been sworn and supported
staffs recommendation.
Ed Clark, 520 Marbrisa Drive, Vero Beach, had been sworn and believed that multi-
family zoning would be out of character in this area.
Bill Broeffle, 616 Marbrisa River Lane, Vero Beach, President of Marbrisa
Homeowners' Association, noted that the association and residents overwhelmingly oppose
the multi -family zoning.
George Irish, an Island Club owner, believed that the multi -family zoning would
enhance the property and did not understand the objections.
SEPTEMBER 1, 1998
-35- rr �? �� .
BOOK 100 FAGE t1-
BOOK DO F,16E d J
Donald Anderson, 945 Island Club Place, Vero Beach, had been sworn and expressed
his support for the applicant's request.
Adele Zabrows1d, an Indian River County resident, felt it was appalling to be
discussing objections to multi -family zoning when the County has residents who don't even
have a place to live.
Alex Drutz had been sworn and supported the applicant's request.
Attorney Ralph Evans, 3355 Ocean Drive, Vero Beach, had been sworn and is the
attorney for the applicant. He noted that the law says this is a property designated L-2 which
can be zoned RM and RS -6. All issues brought up by staff were satisfied except for the
compatibility issue which he did not find in the Code. He had found that decisions about
compatibility are usually found to be arbitrary and capricious. He explained that the
applicant did not file a request for a PD because it costs more and they had already been told
that the multi -family zoning could not be in the location they wanted. He felt because there
are only 2 or 3 lots fronting the Marbrisa development, the request should be simpler. The
County's Code says that RM -6 is permissible in this area.
Mr. Evans read from several court cases and stated that the landowners have a right
to this zoning and the Board has no reason to deny this zoning.
Marilyn DeVries, 760 Marbrisa Lane, Vero Beach, had been sworn and hoped the
Board would encourage the developer to make the transition between their development and
Marbrisa more pleasing.
Ben Casey, 650 Marbrisa River Lane, Vero Beach, had been sworn and opposed the
multi -family zoning.
Theodore Hirsch, 425 Ventura Place, Vero Beach, was opposed to the multi -family
zoning.
The Chairman asked if anyone else wished to be heard regarding this matter. There
being none, the Chairman closed the public hearing.
SEPTEMBER 1, 1998
-36-
Commissioner Eggert noted that she lives in a multi -family development and believed
that when you live in or near multi -family zoning you have an opportunity for more green
space.
Commissioner Eggert was in favor of Option 1.
Commissioner Ginn believed blacktop in that proximity to Jungle Trail and the Indian
River would cause runoff problems.
Commissioner Adams did not have a problem with single-family and multi -family
zonings being mixed and believed it could be handled as an asset. She felt she might have
a more liberal view were a PD being presented but felt a more conservative approach was
in order without the PD to examine.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Ginn, SECONDED
by Commissioner Adams, the Board unanimously
adopted Ordinance 98-020 amending the Zoning
Ordinance and the accompanying Zoning Map from
A-1 to RS -6 for property located on the North
Barrier Island between the existing Island Club
Subdivision and the Indian River Lagoon (Orchid
Place, Ltd.).
ORDINANCE NO. 98-20
AN ORDINANCE OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AMENDING THE ZONING
ORDINANCE AND THE ACCOMPANYING ZONING MAP FROM A-1 TO RS -6, FOR
PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE NORTH BARRIER ISLAND, BETWEEN THE EXISTING
ISLAND CLUB SUBDMSION AND THE INDIAN RIVER LAGOON, AND DESCRIBED
HEREIN, AND PROVIDING FOR EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission, sitting as the local planning agency on
such matters, has held a public hearing and subsequently made a recommendation regarding this
rezoning request; and
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida, did
publish its Notice of Intent to rezone the hereinafter described property; and
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioner, has determined that this rezoning is in
conformance with the Comprehensive Plan of Indian River County; and
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners has held a public hearing pursuant to this
rezoning request, at which parties in interest and citizens were heard;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED, by the Board of County Commissioners of Indian
River County, Florida, that the zoning of the following described property situated in Indian River
County, Florida, to -wit:
SEPTEMBER 1, 1998
-37-BOOK 10� FaGE a
110K 100 PAGE I
ORDINANCE N0.98- 2 0
GOVERNMENT LOT 2 OF SECTION 35, TOWNSHIP 31 SOUTH, RANGE 39 EAST,
AND THAT PORTION OF GOVERNMENT LOT 1, SECTION 35, TOWNSHIP 31
SOUTH, RANGE 39 EAST, LYING WEST OF ISLAND CLUB OF VERO BEACH,
PHASE 1 AND 2, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOKS 14 AND 15, PAGES 69 AND 13,
RESPECTIVELY, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY,
FLORIDA.
SUBJECT TO RIGHTS-OF-WAY AND EASEMENTS OF RECORD.
Be changed from A -Ito RS -6.
All with the meaning and intent and as set forth and described in said Land Development
Regulations.
This ordinance shall become effective upon filing with the Department of State.
Approved and adopted by the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida, on
this 1- day of September, 1998.
This ordinance was advertised in the Press -Journal on the 12' day of August, 1998 for a public
hearing to be held on the 25h day of August,1998. The public hearing was continued to the 1- day
of September, 1998 at which time it was moved for adoption by Commissioner G i n n
seconded by Commissioner Adams , and adopted by the following vote:
Chairman John W. Tippin A Y e
Vice -Chairman Kenneth R. Macht A y e
Commissioner Fran B. Adams Aye
Commissioner Caroline D. Ginn
—
Commissioner Carolyn K. Eggert A v e
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
ATTEST BY:
A ,0Jeffrey K. Barto
d'h , A -z
This ordinanc was filed with the Department of State on the following date:
9 /6_4P
u\v\j\iz\orchid\rzonord ord its" 11`-14AWa.eo
_ Da:e
SEPTEMBER 1, 1998
-38-
0 0
9.A.2. PUBLIC HEARING - LAUREL HOMES, INC. - REQUEST
FOR SPECIAL EXCEPTION USE PLANNED
DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL FOR RESIDENTIAL
PROJECT TO BE KNOWN AS LAUREL SPRINGS
SUBDIVISION - QUASI-JUDICIAL
PRESS -JOURNAL
MAUI:
I
BOOK i0o FAGS I
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of August 21s 1998:
TO: James Chandler
County Administrator
D SION HEAD CONCURRENCE:
Robert M. Keating, AIC P
Community Development Direcaor
4,45
THROUGH: Stan Boling, AICP
Planning Director
FROM: Eric Blad f3
Staff Planner, Current Development
DATE: August 21, 1998
SUBJECT: Laurel Homes, Inc.'s Request for Special Exception Use Planned Development
Approval for a Residential Project to be Known as Laurel Springs Subdivision
It is requested that the data herein presented be given formal consideration by the Board of County
Commissioners at its regular meeting of September 1, 1998.
Carter Associates, Inc. has submitted an application for special exception use and preliminary
planned development (PD) approval on behalf of Laurel Homes, Inc. for a 6 lot residential
development. The subject development is a 1954 acre parcel located on the south side of 8' Street
immediately west of Pine Tree Park (see attachment #2). The southern two-thirds of the subject
parcel was previously excavated as a marl pit in the early 1950's, resulting in the creation of a 13.4
acre lake. No development has occurred on the property since that time, although it appears that the
lake has been used from time to time by area residents for recreational purposes.
PD Process
The PD project review and approval process is as follows:
1. Conceptual Plan/Special Exception PZC & BCC
_'. Preliminary PD Plan PZC
3. Land Development Permit or Waiver Staff
4. Final PD Plat BCC
Planning and Zoning Commission Consideration
At its regular meeting of August 13, 1998, by a vote of 5-1, the Planning and Zoning Commission
recommended that the Board grant conceptual planispecial exception use approval for the subject
planned development with the conditions stated in staffs report. The Planning and Zoning
Commission also granted preliminary plat approval for Laurel Springs Subdivision, subject to the
Board of County Commissioners granting special exception use approval for the project.
The applicant is now requesting Board approval of the conceptual/special exception use request. If
approved by the Board, the preliminary plat approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission will
be validated and the applicant may obtain from public worsts a land development permit (LDP) or
LDP waiver for construction of required PD improvements.
SEPTEMBER 1, 1998
•
-40-
s
•
Board of County Commissioners Consideration _
The Board is now to consider the special exception use request, and approve, approve with
conditions, or deny the use request.
Due to the significant amount of existing lake area on the site and the applicant's desire to develop
the site with minimal impacts to the existing vegetative "buffer" along the northern portion of the
site, it is appropriate that the site be developed via the PD process.
1. Size of PD Area: 19.54 acres
Note: The subject site contains an existing 13.4 acre lake and 6.14 acres of dry land. Only
5.29 acres of the dry land area (the area north of the lake) are proposed for actual
development.
2. Zoning Classification: RS -3, Residential Single Family (up to 3 units/acre)
3. Land Use Designation: L-2, Low Density (up to 6 units/acre)
4. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning:
North: 8' Street, vacant/A-1
South: ResidentiaURS-6
East: Residential/RS-6
West: Citrus grove/A-1
5. Open Space: Required: 40.0%
Provided: 78.9% (within the limits of development)
6. Density: 0.31 units per gross acre (0.98 units per acre of dry land)
7. Maximum Lot/Homesite Area: Minimum: 12.000 sq. ft.
Proposed: 33.561 sq. ft.
8. Stormwater Management: The public works department has reviewed and approved a
conceptual stormwater plan. Detailed stormwater plans will be reviewed and approved as
part of the land development permit or permit waiver process. Prior to issuance of such a
permit or permit waiver, the applicant will need to obtain an easement for an off-site
drainage outfall proposed by the applicant.
9. Traffic Circulation: Access to the proposed Laurel Springs Subdivision will be provided
by a private, single two-way roadway connection to r Street. The project's entry road
terminates in a cul-de-sac a short distance into the project site. Access to the lots that do not
front on the cul-de-sac will be provided by two paved roadways that branch -out east and west
from the cul-de-sac (see attachment #3). The two branch roadways will terminate at the
property lines of the easternmost and westernmost lots. Except for the entrance road/cul-de-
sac, proposed roadway improvements will not disturb the existing vegetative "buffer" along
the northern boundary of the site.
Five east/west platted, public roads (r Lane, 7m Place, 7th Street, 6th Place, and 6th Street)
within Pine Tree Park currently terminate at the subject site's east property line.
Continuation of 7'h Street, 6'h Place, and 6'h Street are precluded by the existing lake, and the
continuation of 7'h Lane and 7'h Place are not required since the proposed development
contains few lots and will be accessed by a private road. However, the applicant has
proposed the use of 7'h Place as a temporary project construction entrance. The Public Works
Director has discussed this proposal with the applicant and a resident of 7'h Place and has no
objection to the proposed temporary construction entrance subject to the following
conditions:
a) The applicant must meet with affected 7`h Place residents to discuss and reasonably
address their concerns and security issues.
b) A schedule of hours of operation/use of the construction entrance shall be established
in a manner that reasonably addresses residents' concerns.
C) If problems arise regarding control of access, then at the discretion of the Public
Works Director, the applicant shall construct a temporary security gate at the
construction entrance that will be open only during the agreed to hours of
operation/use.
SEPTEMBER 1. 1998
0
—41—
BOQl4 100 FAG -
t d i i
I
BOOK 106 FAGS r A
These provisions will be incorporated into the project's LDP or LDP waiver which will be
issued by Public Works.
10. Utilities: Potable water service is available to service the project, and the required
connection has been approved by the county Utilities Services Department. County
wastewater service is not available to the project at this time. The use of on-site septic
systems has been approved by the county Utility Services Department and the county Health
Department. The final design of the water service system will be reviewed through the
project's land development permit (LDP) or LDP waiver process.
11. Dedications & Improvements: The Public Works Department has identified a Murphy Act
Deed Right -of -Way Reservation along the site's northern boundary which is adjacent to 8'
Street. The right-of-way reservation extends approximately 45' onto the northern portion
of the subject site, at a point approximately one-third the length of the project's entry
ma&cul-de-sac. The only improvements proposed within the reservation area are roadway
and drainage improvements, which are allowed within the reservation area. Although not
a technical requirement, the Public Works Director recommends that the applicant obtain
a Murphy Act Deed Right -of -Way Reservation release prior to final plat approval. Public
Works recommends that the applicant apply to the state for such a release because none of
the Murphy Act Deed Reservation area is needed for fu tm P Street improvements due to
the intervening Indian River Farms canal.
12. Recreation Issues: Pursuant to section 915.19(1), no recreation area is required for this PD
since it contains fewer than 60 units. The issue of adjacent property owners use of the lake
is not an issue that can be addressed via the PD process. That is an issue between private
property owners. However, it should be noted that the developer intends to allow owners of
properties that abut the lake to participate in some form of a private property owners
association that would involve participation in maintenance costs and rights to use the lake.
13. Environmental Issues:
Uplands: Since the site is greater than 5 acres in area, the native upland set-aside
requirements of section 929.05 apply. Environmental planning staff has identified
native upland habitat communities in the northern portion of the subject site.
Therefore, prior to the issuance of a LDP or LDP waiver the applicant shall either
take measures to preserve the upland habitat communities or pay a fee -in -lieu of
preservation. The applicant has indicated a fee -in -lieu of preservation will be paid
to alleviate the need to establish a preservation easement.
Wetland: No jurisdictional wetlands have been identified on the site, although the
lake is classified as an open body wetland by county environmental planning staff.
However, because no changes to the lake are proposed, no wetland requirements
apply.
Nuisance Exotic Vegetation: The perimeter of the project is lined with Australian
pines, while the interior of the site is relatively free of Australian pines and other
exotic vegetation. Normally, as a condition of a project's land cleating permit. all
nuisance exotic vegetation must be removed from the site.
The applicant is proposing to remove all nuisance exotic vegetation within the
interior of the development area. It is the applicant's position, however, that the
Australian pines along the perimeter of the lake can be accessed only from adjacent
property. Furthermore, it is also the applicant's position that removal of the
Australian pines along the west boundary of the site could result in damage to native
trees, and that portions of the Australian pines straddle the property line.
As allowed through the PD process, the applicant is requesting a waiver from the
requirement to remove the existing Australian pines along the entire length of the
western boundary of the project and those located between the lake and the south and
east boundaries of the site. In essence, the developer intends to leave as is the portion
of the overall site that surrounds and includes the lake.
In staff's opinion, the requestedwaiver is justifiable due to the unique circumstances
of the site. In regard to the Australian pines along the west property line. staff agrees
that portions of the pines are not on the subject site and legally could be cleared only
up to the property line, resulting in removal of merely a portion of the pines.
Furthermore, clearing those pines would adversely impact some existing native trees
that are growing nearby. In regard to the Australian pines that line the east and south
sides of the lake anTare located within a narrow strip of land, staff agrees that those
SEPTEMBER 1, 1998
0 is
•
trees cannot be feasibly removed from the interior of the site due to the presence of
the existing lake. Removal from adjacent properties cannot be required technically,
and may not be feasible in certain cases where access would be through someone's
back yard. Therefore, staff believes that the waiver request is justifiable.
14. Buffer & Setbacks:
Based upon the compatibility matrix in LDR section 915.16, no special PD related buffers
are required other than the normal, minimum 25' PD perimeter building setback. That 25'
building setback is depicted on the PD plan along the entire perimeter of the project.
However, the county's agriculturelresidential buffer applies where proposed Lot 6 abuts an
existing active grove. Therefore, a Type "B" buffer with a 6 high opaque feature is required
along the west boundary of Lot 6.
As an alternative, the applicant can work with the owner(s) of the adjacent grove and obtain
an easement prohibiting active agricultural operations over the portion of the grove that abuts
Lot 6. Such an easement could prohibit active agricultural operations, such as spraying, so
as to protect the residents of Lot 6. Such an easement should have a minimum width of 60',
a distance which corresponds to the separation between Lot 6 and active agricultural uses that
would occur if there were a local road right-of-way between Lot 6 and the grove. Where there
is an intervening right-of-way, the agriculturd residential buffer requirements do not apply.
Therefore, prior to issuance of an LDP or LDP waiver, the applicant must either depict the
agricultural/residential buffer on the PD plans or commit to the alterative arrangement for
an easement. Any such easement arrangement will need to be approved by staff and finalized
prior to final plat approval.
15. Caribbean Fruit Fly Host Plant: The county has adopted a comprehensive plan policy
prohibiting Caribbean fruit fly host plants in residential PDs, such as this project, that are
close to areas of active groves. Therefore, prior to or via the project's final plat approval,
host plant prohibitions shall be included in covenants and restrictions that affect the project
site.
16. Concurrency: The applicant has obtained a conditional concurrency certificate which
satisfies concurrency requirements related to the special exception use and preliminary PD
plan/plat requests. Therefore, all concurrency requirements related to special exception use
and preliminary PD phuVplat approval have been satisfied.
17. Waivers: As allowed through the planned development special exception use process, the
applicant is permitted to request waivers from certain normally applied provisions of the land
development regulations. The requested waivers are as follows:
Allow the standard entrance road/cul-de-sac right-of-way width to be used even
through a small entrance road median is to be constructed. (Note: normally, the
right-of-way would be required to be expanded the width of the median.)
2. Reduce roadway pavement widths from 20' to 18'.
Keep existing Australian pines along the entire western boundary of the project site,
and those located between the lake and the south and east perimeter of the overall
site.
4. Eliminate any cul-de-sac or "T" turn around at the ends of the east and west branch
roadways. Such roadways would simply terminate at the driveways for Lots 1 and
6, respectively.
Due to the low density and low traffic generation characteristics of the project, the efforts to
design improvements so as to minimally impact existing vegetation, and for reasons
previously stated regarding the Australian pine issue, staff has no objections to these
requested waivers.
SEPTEMBER 1, 1998
-43-
•
106
� ' 1,
BOOK
l� `
PAGE I �
BOOK DO NAGE rd J0
Based on the above analysis, staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners approve
the special exception use request and associated waivers, with the following conditions:
Prior to the issuance of a land development permit (LDP) or LDP waiver, the applicant shall:
a. Satisfy the conditions imposed by the Public Works Director regarding use of T'
Place for a temporary project construction entrance.
b. Depict on the PD plans the required agricultureiresidential buffer along the west
boundary of Lot 6 or commit to the easement arrangement as described in section 14
of this report.
C. Satisfy the county's upland set aside requirement (conservation or fee -in -lieu of
preservation).
I Prior to final plat approval, the applicant shall provide either.
a. The required agriculture/residential buffer along the west boundary of Lot 6, or
b. Document that a 60' wide easement has been established on the adjacent property that
prohibits active citrus operation along the west boundary of Lot 6.
3. Prior to or via final plat approval, a restrictive covenant shall be established on the project
site prohibiting Caribbean fruit fly host plants. Furthermore, as a PD special exception use
condition, Caribbean fruit fly host plants are prohibited within the overall project site.
4. Prior to final plat approval, the applicant shall apply for release of the Murphy Act Deed
reservation right-of-way area affecting the northern portion of the project site.
SEPTEMBER 1, 1998
-44-
10
� i I
o j
r l" ,: 1; '
L-PIWI-I l0 WAI y Maj, ly{'SII 911T__ —
�N
N' MIME STOP RAR
I rc m I .I
-i ,�-44�
i 11) (1 • • f
1 ,�
t' p�4�la — d~ EASEMENT
I'-Y�—_ i w-tj — PROPOSED 01
—
_ — a
—
1
RIGHT-OF-WAY
w
n 1
O S:�-LATERAi.. B.t
., / _ '•� JO' CANAL •'
.
;�$
w
H
� i I
o j
r l" ,: 1; '
44410!1 lo' UTILITY
containing ON
I rc m I .I
-i ,�-44�
i 11) (1 • • f
1 ,�
t' p�4�la — d~ EASEMENT
I'-Y�—_ i w-tj — PROPOSED 01
CMOMC
-
I
w
I 141El
N'
w
H
I
I
PPRP D f0' -- I—
I
EASEYENI I I-
.._
CONST. 14' p' WII [HIST,•• AND
I �T. i4'
I
I
I
LEGEND
containing ON
Australian pines
EUStM OAK INE • OWKIER
I
w
N'
w
H
I
I
PKOP09ED 8MD" AREA
I
I
--
4-
-- I�IBATAE[C11
A
RE R4
N '
I
I
I
I
I -
I_
I
TRACT IN
I
ISTOFMMATER TRACT)
_
I
I
I
I
-M LANE
I I.
I
I;.
}I
11.
ISI
E4' PD 8u40W0
SE:WAOK 41111E
I (Tw.t
II 7TH PLACE
(PROPOSED COISINOCnaM INn1AN0E)
LOOS _ 1
6? 'm
r r,
Narrow land strip 00
containing ON
Australian pines
I
w
w
H
I
I
TntqTnFFr
6? 'm
r r,
rp�_
800 6 PnE i
Planning Director Stan Boling noted that the project will develop only 6 lots in the
upland area. The applicant will leave the Australian pines around the perimeter of the lake
and a cul-de-sac will be created with construction access on 6' Place. Staff is recommending
approval with the conditions outlined.
Commissioner Adams questioned the agricultural buffer, and Director Boling stated
this is an agreement between the developer and the grove owner.
The Chairman opened the public hearing and asked if anyone wished to be heard
regarding this matter.
Pete Robinson, Laurel Homes, Inc., advised that the owner of the grove came to the
developer with the offer.
Kathleen Kye, President of the Homeowners Association, advised that the grove
owner was involved in the buffering decision and both the residents and the grove owner are
happy with the buffer.
The Chairman asked if anyone else wished to be heard regarding this matter. There
being none, the Chairman closed the public hearing.
Commissioner Ginn felt the buffer area should be larger.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert,
SECONDED by Commissioner Macht, the Board,
by a 4-1 vote (Commissioner Ginn opposed)
approved Laurel Homes, Inc.'s request for special
exception use Planned Development approval for a
residential project to be known as Laurel Springs
Subdivision, with the conditions as recommended by
staff.
SEPTEMBER 1, 1998
-46-
•
C
9.A.3. PUBLIC HEARING - RESOLUTION 98-087 - SEBASTIAN
WATER EXPANSION - PHASE II -B
PRESS-JOURNM
Published Daily
Vero Beach, Indian River County, Florida
COUNTY OF INDIAN RIVER: STATE OF FLORIDA
B6f= ft
President of � personally Darryl K. Hicks who on
in tridfan River County, Florida; that the attached cropt+ �. 8t Vero Beach
a Nui1,
in the Corm, was pub..
Iished in said newspaper in the Issues of - 1 lrlt A 1 114 7-1 1 QQT
saidffiant further says Indian#0 � am is a paper pub&W at Vero Beach, In
Florida, and that the said newspaper has �Dt°re been
NOTICE
Y published In�said Ir R t een v*wed
Subject: UTILITIES SPECIAL
second Baas mail matter at the post offbe l Vero Beach, In aaid�U�e�n WRIver
a period of one year next prer:edng the first publication of the attached copy
ASSESSMENT PUBLICFIEARING
The Board of County Conlml3sion-
adv of
and aff�nt furtt�ar says that he has neither pact mar promised any person, firm
discount, rebate. commission or refund for the purpose of
ers of Indian River County, Florida,
adve�t for securing this
publication in said newspaper.
hereby provides notice of a public
hearing set for 9.05 a.m. on Tues-
'ytE�'aap subscribed before rr� daN QHS
day, September 1, 1998, at the
.1g
q�1•G;.�
'
County Commission Chambers in
�.(l/
the County Administration Building,
1840 25th Street, Vero Beach, Fl.
Alm COMMKSbN 1111US t *
lAUUAtm Oi, 2001
es-
32960, to discuss a proposed res-
CC611043
`099 (SEAL) .0�+7 RHON ANG
olufion'relating to a special assess -
olution
moot project for water in Indian
Notary blit, State of Florida
�•
CiC 611Q 1
River County, Florida, for the
`EXTENSION
IC, S.A��r•'c'
Comm.No
•..,...++ Personally Known aK Produced ID O
MAIN ' O SEBAS-
TIAN' AREA PHASE 11-Q, (an area
T: ere of ID Produced
located east of Roseland Road to
Vocelle Avenue) and providing for
special assessment liens to be
made of record on the properties
to be served..
Interested parties may appear at
Me meetinqyt'�B6rd with
respect to the proposed special
assessment.. Anyone who wants to
Inspect any proposed documents
may do so at the Utility Services
Department, 1840 .25th Street,
Vero Beach, FL
Anyone who may wish to appeal
any decision which may be made
at this meeting will need to ensure
that a verbatim record of the pro-
ceedings is made, which includes
testimony and evidence upon which
the appeal is based.
Anyone who needs a special
i accommodation ,for this meeting
may contact the County's Ameri-
cans with Disabilities Ad (ADA)
Coordinator at 567-8000,'Eid. 223
at least 48 hours in advance of the
meeting.
Aug. 14, 21,1998 1396590
SEPTEMBER 1, 1998
807
—47— BOOK JOG FAGE d sL
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of August 24, 1998:
DATE: AUGUST 24, 1998
TO: JAMES E. CHANDLER
COUNTY ADNNISTRATOR
FROM: DONALD R. HUBBS, P.E.
DIRECTOR OF UTILTIY' E
PREPARED JAMES D. C1%
AND STAFFED MANAGER OF�E_ PROJECTS
BY: DEPARTMENT OF UTII.IIY SERVICES
SUBJECT: SEBASTIAN WATER EXPANSION - PHASE 11-B
RESOLUTION III - PURUC HEARING
DMIAN RIVER COUNTY PROJECT NO. UW -97 -11 -DS
BACKGROUND
On August 11, 1998, the Indian River County Board of County Commissioners
approved Resolutions 98-77 (Resolution I) and 98-78 (Resolution II), which contained
the preliminary assessment roll and established the date of the public hearing for the
subject project. Property owners have been notified of the public hearing by certified
mail. Resolution 98-77 was published in the PRESS JOURNAL on August 17, 1998.
(See attached agenda item and minutes for the above meeting.)
ANALYSIS
Design of the water distribution system is complete. Approval of the attached
Resolution III will confirm and approve the preliminary assessment.
An informational meeting was held for the property owners on August 25, 1998 at 7:00
p.m. in the County Commission Chambers. The attached map displays the area to
benefit from the assessment project. The area to be served is located north of CR 512
and east of Roseland Road.
This area includes all or portions of 41 blocks. Included are 758 lots. There are 714
Parcel IDs. Typical lot sizes are .25 acre, plus or minus.
The City of Sebastian entered into an interlocal agreement with Indian River County
providing for the transfer of the City of Sebastian's water and wastewater system on
September 20, 1995. The agreement requires the County to extend water or wastewater
transmission, distribution or collection facilities and improvements, and impose special
assessments upon benefited parcels located within the incorporated area of the City.
At their regular meeting of June 26, 1996, the City Council adopted Resolution No. R-
96-48 (copy attached), which waived the sixty-day notice requirement as per Section
6.07(B) of the interlocal agreement. This resolution further states that the City Council
deems it in the best interest of the citizens of Sebastian that Indian River County
proceed as soon as possible with the water expansion.
The attached map displays the area to benefit from the assessment project. This project
is to be paid through the assessment of property owners along the proposed
line
route. In the interim, financing will be from the assessment fund with inter -fund
borrowing from the water impact fee fund (472) and operations and maintenance fund
(47 1). Engineering design services and the assessment roll have been prepared by staff.
Survey work was provided by Masteller, Moler and Reed, Inc. We are now ready to
begin the assessment process associated with this project. The total estimated cost and
amount to be assessed is $1,714,277.33. The total estimated cost per square foot is
$0.208299 (rounded).
The estimated cost of Phase II -B is greater than Phase II -A ($0.191713), primarily due to
the cost to overlay paving of 21 intersections, where there will be necessary road cuts.
This is a requirement of the City of Sebastian for roads that are classified to be in good
condition. As with Phase II -A and all of Phase II, costs are estimated greater due to a
higher ratio of improvements, concrete driveways, more stringent restoration
specifications, and conservancy with the estimate, as well as a smaller area of property
to distribute the cost over. The assessed cost, as with any project, will be regulated by
the degree of competition at the bidding of the project.
On August 17, 1998, a letter was sent to the City Manager, Thomas Frame, City of
Sebastian with a copy of this agenda item, a map of the Phase. II -B (Phase II) project
area, and a summary assessment roll schedule.
The staff of the Department of Utility Services recommends that the Board of County
Commissioners approve the attached Resolution M.
SEPTEMBER 1, 1998
-48-
•
•
The Chairman opened the public hearing and asked if anyone wished to be heard
regarding this matter.
Joe Serafin, 661 Jordan, Sebastian, noted that the cost for this phase of the work will
be $782 more per lot than Phase I and questioned the price hike. He also noted that the City
of Sebastian has a 10 -foot easement for stormwater which is filled with weeds, snakes, and
rats. This is 800 square feet of property over which the homeowners have no control.
Utilities Director Don Hubbs advised that Phase I was a much larger project. Phase
II was broken into 5 individual phases and they are hoping the cost will be considerably less
but they are trying to be realistic.
Mr. Serafin also questioned what contribution the federal government has made to the
water treatment plan or to the sewer project. They contributed over 60% of the cost where
he came from.
County Attorney Vitunac advised that Indian River County has chosen to self -fund
all these projects.
Mary Fox, 861 Tarpon Avenue, Sebastian, stated that there are a lot of retirees in that
area who all paid for wells and septic tanks and are satisfied. They do not want to pay for
the water when they don't need it and don't want it. This will be a hardship on a lot of
people.
The Chairman asked if anyone else wished to be heard regarding this matter. There
being none, the Chairman closed the public hearing.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert,
SECONDED by Commissioner Adams, the Board
unanimously adopted Resolution 98-087 confirming
the special assessments in connection with a water
main extension to the Sebastian Area Phase II -B,
providing for special assessment liens to be made of
record.
SEPTEMBER 1, 1998
-49-
BOOK i0o F,+Ut
BOOK RAGE Di _i. `A
Pubft Hu" (TM RON.)
RESOLUTION NO. 98- 87
se�r�o�senze�vwoc
A RESOLUTION OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA,
CONFIRMING THE SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS IN CONNECTION
WITH A WATER MAIN EXTENSION TO THE SEBASTIAN AREA
PHASE 11-13; PROVIDING FOR SPECIAL ASSESSMENT LIENS TO
BE MADE OF RECORD.
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County has, by
Resolution No. 98-77, adopted August 11, 1998, determined to make special
assessments against certain properties to be serviced by a water main extension to the
Sebastian Area Phase II -B (located east of Roseland Road to Voceile Avenue); and
WHEREAS, said resolution described the manner in which said special
assessments shall be made and how said special assessments are to be paid; and
WHEREAS, the resolution was published in the Vero Beach Press Journal, as
required by Section 206.04, Indian River County Code; and
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County passed
Resolution No. 98-78 on August 11, 1998, and set a time and place for a public hearing
at which the owners of the properties to be assessed and other interested persons
would have the chance to be heard as to any and all complaints as to said project and
said special assessments, and for the Board to act as required by Section 206.07,
Indian River County Code; and
WHEREAS, notice of the time and place of the public hearing was published in
the Press Journal Newspaper on Friday, August 14, 1998, and once again on Friday,
August 21, 1998 (twice one week apart; the last being at least one week prior to the
hearing), as required by Section 206.06, Indian River County Code; and
WHEREAS, the land owners of record were mailed notices at least ten days prior
to the hearing, as required by Section 206.06, Indian River County Code; and
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County on
Tuesday, September 1, 1998, at 9:05 a.m. conducted the public hearing with regard to
the special assessments;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, as follows:
1. The foregoing recitals are affirmed and ratified in their entirety.
2. The special assessments shown on the attached assessment roll are hereby—
confirmed and approved, and shall remain legal, valid, and binding first liens against
the properties assessed until paid in full.
3. The Board finds that the properties assessed by this resolution will receive special
benefits equal to or greater than the cost of the assessment.
4. The County will record the special assessments and this resolution, which describes
the properties assessed and the amounts of the special assessments, on the public
records, which shall constitute prima facie evidence of the validity of the special
assessments.
- The resolution was moved for adoption by Commissioner F a g p r r . and the motion
was seconded by Commissioner A d a m s , and, upon being put to a vote, the vote
was as follows:
SEPTEMBER 1, 1998
-50-
i 9
Chairman John W. Tippin Aye
Vice Chairman Kenneth R. Macht Aye
Commissioner Caroline D. Ginn Aye
Commissioner Carolyn K. Eggert Aye
Commissioner Fran B. Adams Aye
The Chairman thereupon declared the resolution duly passed and adopted this
1st day of September, 1998
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
Atte s K. Barton,
B
By John W. Tippi
Deputy Clerk C, 0Chairman
Attachment: ASSESSMENT ROLL
(to be recorded on Public Records)
Iinean Pow Ca I AFprove/ I Dale
Lagai
tiu v 1e 1
FUSK
PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT SUMMARY
SEBASTIAN WATER EXPANSION PHASE 11-8
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY PROJECT NO. U W - 97 -11- D S
TOTAL ESTIMATED PROJECT CONSTRUCTION
COST INCLUDING ENGINEERING AND ADMINISTRATION $1,714,277.33
TOTAL NET SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PROPERTIES
TO BE ASSESSED 8,229,895
ESTIMATED ASSESSMENT COST PER SQUARE FOOT $0.20829880940
ROUNDED $0.208299
SEPTEMBER 1, 1998
-51- BOOK PAGE i -L' O
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
18
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
CMN
c
PAGE 1
SEBASTIAN WATER EXPANSION PHASE 11- B
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY PROJECT NO. UW-97--11-DS J. D. C.
8.15-98
SBPHIIBI.WK4
01 31 38 00003 0430 000020
01 31 38 00003 0430 00004.0
01 31 38 00003 0430 00005.0
01 31 38 00003 0430 00006.0
01 31 38 00003 0430 00007.0
01 31 38 00003 0430 00009.0
01 31 38 00003 0430 00013.0
01 31 38 00003 0430 00014.0
01 31 38 00003 0430 00015.0
01 31 38 00003 0430 00016.0
01 31 38 00003 0430 00017.0
01 31 38 00003 0430 00019.0
01 31 38 00003 0430 00020.0
01 31 38 00003 0430 00021.0
01 31 38 W003 0430 00023.0
01 31 38 00003 0430 00024.0
01 31 38 00003 0440 00001.0
01 31 38 00003 0440 00002.0
01 31 38 00003 0440 00003.0
01 31 38 00003 0440 00004.0
01 31 38 00003 0440 00005.0
01 31 38 00003 0440 00007.0
01 31 38 00003 0440 00008.0
01 31 36 00003 0440 00009.0
01 31 38 00003 0440 00010.0
01 31 38 00003 0440 00011.0
01 31 38 00003 0440 00014.0
01 31 38 00003 0440 00015.0
01 31 38 00003 0440 00016.0
01 31 38 00003 0440 00017.0
01 31 38 00003 0440 00018.0
01 31 38 00003 0440 00019.0
01 31 38 00003 0440 00020.0
01 31 38 W003 0440 00021.0
01 31 38 00003 0440 00022.0
01 31 38 00003 0440 00023.0
01 31 38 W003 0450 00001.0
01 31 38 00003 0450 00002.0
01 31 38 00003 0450 00003.0
01 31 38 00003 0450 00004.0
01 31 38 00003 0450 00005.0
01 31 38 00003 0450 00006.0
01 31 38 00003 0450 00007.0
01 31 38 00003 0450 00008.0
01 31 38 00003 0450 00009.0
01 31 38 00003 0450 00010.0
01 31 38 00003 0450 00011.0
01 31 38 00003 0450 000120
01 31 38 00003 0450 00013.0
01 31 38 00003 0450 00014.0
01 31 38 00003 0450 00015.0
01 31 38 00003 0450 00016.0
01 31 38 00003 0450 00017.0
01 31 38 00003 0450 00018.0
01 31 38 00003 0450 00019.0
SEPTEMBER 1, 1998
STEWART
HALE
FORWARD
BONAR
MACDOUGAL
GHIGNA
WOLERT
BELWOOD
MAYNARD
SHORTELL
MADIGAN
MAD--fGAN
L-EiMNN��
LINDSEY
HOLIDAY BLDRS
BAILEY
KOZLOWSKI
ROMANENKO
WEGGELAND
JACOBS
JACOBS
-BA6illoik$
BILLS
MORRIS
LEHTO
SMITH
FLORIDA CO
IJWNACCONE
PRICHETTE
HARLESS
KLIEMISCH
DOUGHERTY
DICK
FELTHOUSEN
MATTHEWS
PSOLKA
GIBSON
GIBSON
MOORE
HEARNDON
FALZONE
EASTER
WAHL
WAHL
SIMIELE
ARTESI
RAFULS
WALTZ
HUNNICUTT
GATES
PEACOCK
SNIFFEN
PALM BAY RANCH
LAROSA
20,000
4,165.98
10,000
2,08299
10,000
2,082.99
10,000
2,08299
20,000
4,165.98
20,000
4,165.98
10,800
2,249.63
12,150
2,530.83
10,000
2,08299
10,000
2,08299
20,000
4,165.98
10,000
2,08299
10,000
2,08299
20,000
4,155.98
10,000
2,082.99
23,684
4,929.19
12,500
2,603.74
10,000
2,08299
10,000
2,082.99
10,000
2,08299
20,000
4,165.98
10,000
2,08299
10,000
2,08299
10,000
2,082.99
10,000
2,082.99
10,000
2,08299
10,000
2,082.99
10,000
2,082.99
10,000
2,08299
10,000
2,08299
10,000
2,08299
10,000
2,082.99
10,000
2,08299
10,000
2,082.99
10,000
2,082.99
22,500
4,586.73
11,875
2,473.55
10,000
2,08299
10,000
2,082.99
10,000
2,08299
10,000
2,082.99
10,000
2,08299
10,000
2,082.99
10,000
2,08299
10,000
2,082.99
10,000
2,08299
10,000
2,08299
10,000
2,082.99
10,000
2,082.99
11,875
2,473.55
11,875
2,473.55
10,000
2,08299
10,000
2,082.99
10,000
208299
10,000
Z082.99
-52-
0 0
•
68 A
A g
PAGE 2 C
D
E
69
PARCEL
�H
SQUARE71
OWNER
E00TAGE
AMMENT
72
73
01 31 38 00003 0450 00020.0
OURS
10,000
2,082.99
74
013138 00003 0450 00021.0
013138 00003 0450 00022.0
LOVELY
10,000
2.082.99
75
76
013138 00003 0450 00023.0
DISABATO
CHRISTIANSEN
10,000
10,000
2,082 99
2'D�
77
013138 00003 0450 00024.0
HILL
10,000
2,082.99
78
013138 00003 0450 00025.0
PATNODE
10.000
ZOV-99
013138 00003 0450 00026.0
01 31 38 00003 0450 00027.0
HOLLER
HOLLER
10,000
2'x'99
80
81
013138 00003 0450 00028.0
EVANS
10,000
11,875
2,082.99
2,473.55
82
013138 00003 0460 00001.0
013138 00003 0460 00002.0
VELEK
TEAL
12,500
2.803.74
83
013138 00003 0460 00003.0
CHOATE
10,000
10.000
2, 99
2.082.99
85
01 31 38 00003 0480 00004.0
01 31 38 00003 0460 00005.0
SMITH
SMITH
10,000
2.082.99
86
87
01 31 38 00003 0460 00007.0
RAMSAMMY
20'OW
10.000
4.185.99
2,082.99
88
01 31 38 00003 0480 00008.0
01 31 38 00003 0460 00009.0
MILLER
SMITH
10,000
2'992.99
89
013138 00003 0460 00010.0
SMITH
10,000
10.000
2,082.99
90
91
013138 00003 0400 00011.0
CLEMENTE
10,000
2.082.99
2,x.99
92
013138 00003 0460 00014.0
01 31 38 00003 0460 00015.0
HUNTER
KURRLE
10,000
2.082.99
93
94
01 31 38 00003 0460 00016.0
DAVENPORT
10.000
10,000
2,082.99
2.082.99
95
01 31 38 00003 0460 00017.0
01 31 38 00003 0460 00018.0
VICKERS
O' HARA
10.000
2.082.99
96
01 31 38 00003 0400 00019.0
COPELAND
10,000
10,000
2,082.99
97
99
01 31 38 00003 0400 00020.0
MAIO
10,000
2,992.99
2,082.99
99
01 31 38 00003 0460 00021.0
01 31 38 00003 0460 00022.0
MAIO
MAIO
10.000
2,082.99
100
01 31 38 00003 0460 00023.0
FAZIO
10,000
2,082.99
101
013138 X03 0460 00024.0
BEARE
1
122,5W
500
2,082.99
102
103
01 31 38 00003 0480 00001.0
WHEAT
.
12,500
2.603.74
2.603.
104
01 31 38 00003 0480 00002.0
01 31 38 00003 0480 00004.0
BURAK
DIMARZIO
20,000
4.185.99
98
105
01 31 38 00003 0480 00005.0
COPELAND
10,000
10.000
2,082.99
107
01 31 38 00003 0480 00006.0
TASSOPOULOS
10.000
2,08Z99106
2.082.99
108
01 31 38 00003 0480 00007.0
01 31 38 00003 0480 00008.0
SALUT
KRAUSS
10.000
2,082.99 ,
109
01 31 38 00003 0480 00009.0
KRAUSS
10.000
10.000
2.082.99
110
111
01 31 38 00003 0480 00010.0
KRAUSS
10,000
2.082.99
2.082.99
112
01 31 38 00003 0480 00011.0
01 31 38 00003 0480 00014.0
NARVAEZ
BORER
10,000
2.082.99
113
013138 00003 0480 00015.0
GRAFF
10,000
2,082.99
114
013138 00003 0480 00016.0
BORER
10'000
2.082.99
A 01 31 38 00003 0480 00017.0
MILLER
000.0000
2''�
/ds 98
117
118
01 31 38 00003 0480 00019.0
01 31 38 00003 0480 00020.0
TROISI
JOHNSON
10,000
2,082.99
119
120
01 31 38 00003 0480 00021.0
VAN COPPENOLLE
10.000
10,000
2.082.99
2,082.99
121
01 31 38 00003 0480 00022.0
013138 00003 0480 00024.0
MOLLER
NCNB NTL BK OF FL
20.000
4.165.99
122
013138 00003 0500 00001.0
MCMILLWN
12,500
17,140
2,603 74
123
124
01 31 38 00003 0500 00002.0
MCMILLIAN
10,000
3,57024
2.082.99
125
01 31 38 00003 0500 00003.0
01 31 38 00003 0500 00004.0
SMS
SMITH
10.000
2.082.99
126
127
013138 0000305W 00005.0
HOGATE
10.000
10,000
2,082 99
2'x'99
01 31 38 00003 0500 00008.0
LAMAN
128
01 31 38 00003 0500 00007.0
JOLLEY
10,000
2.082.99
129
130
013138 00003 0500 00009.0
PALM BAY RANCH
20.000
10,000
4.165.98
2,082.99
131
01 31 38 00003 0500 00010.0
01 31 38 00003 0500 00011.0
NCNB NAT BK OF FL
10,000
2,082.99
132
01 31 38 00003 0.000 00012.0
SIWEK
SIEWK
10000
2.992.99
133
01 31 38 60003 0500 00013.0
SIWEK
10.000
2.082.99
134
01 31 38 00003 0500 00014.0
KEELER
10.000
10.000
2,082.99
2.082.99
SEPTEMBER 1. 1998
•
-53-
BOOK io
BOOK AG PAGE r ''
135
A B
C
D
E
136
PAGE 3
137
PARCEL
SQUARE
138
NUMBER
OWNER
FOOTAGE
139
ASSESSMENT
140
013138 00003 0500 00019.0
COAKLEY
10.000
2,082.99
141
013138 00003 0500 00020.0
EGAN
10,000
2,082.99
142
013138 00003 0500 00021.0
ROMINE
10,000
2,082.99
143
144
013138 00003 0500 00022.0
DERASMO
10,000
2,082.99
145
013138 00003 0500 00023.0
HALL
10.000
2.082.99
146
013138 00003 0500 00024.0
EWS
10,000
2,082.99
147
013138 00003 0500 00025.0
WIDEBERG
10,000
2,08299
148
013138 00003 0500 00028.0
FORGITANO
10,000
2,08299
149
013138 00003 0500 00027.0
MYRICK
10,000
2,082.99
150
013138 00003 0500 00028.0
LYDSTON
10,000
2,082.99
151
013138 00003 0500 00029.0
SARSFIELD
10,000
2,082.99
152
013138 00003 0500 000.30.0
MERCATELL
10,000
2,082.99
153
013138 00003 0500 00031.0
MERCATELL
10,000
2,08299
154
013138 00003 0500 00032.0
SHAHINIAN
10,000
2,082.99
155
01 31 38 00003 0500 00033.0
HARTLE
10,000
2082.99
156
01 31 38 00003 0500 00034.0
IND RVR FED CREDIT
10,000
2,082.99
157
013138 00003 0500 00035.0
WENGER
17,140
3,57024
158
013138 00003 0510 00001.0
WRIGHT
13,125
2,733.92
159
01 31 38 00003 0510 000020
PARENT
10,000
2,082.99
160
013138 00003 0510 00003.0
KILLILEA
10,000
2,08299
01 31 38 00003 0510 00004.0
MEDEIROS
10,000
2,08299
161
01 31 38 00003 0510 00005.0
POSEY
10,000
2,082.99
162
163
013138 00003 0510 00006.0
LAMBERT
10,000
2,08299
164
01 31 38 00003 0510 00007.0
SANFILIPPO
10,000
2,08299
165
01 31 38 00003 0510 00008.0
REYNOLDS
10,000
2,082.99
166
013138 00003 0510 00009.0
CESKY
10,000
2,082,99
167
01 31 38 00003 0510 00010.0
DELISLE
13,125
2,733.92
168
01 31 38 00003 0510 00011.0
GOLIS
13,125
2,733.92
169
01 31 38 00003 0510 00012.0
ADAMS
10,000
2,082.99
170
01 31 38 00003 0510 00013.0
KNIGHT
10,000
2,082.99
171
01 31 38 00003 0510 00014.0
FAULKNER
10,000
2,08299
172
01 31 38 00003 0510 00015.0
LIAKOPOULOS
10,000
2,082.99
173
01 31 38 00003 0510 00016.0
ADLER
10,000
2,082.99
174
01 31 38 00003 0510 00017.0
CHRISICOS
20,000
4,165.98
175
01 31 38 W003 0510 00019.0
HEPTINSTALL
10,000
2,082.99
176
01 31 38 00003 0510 00020.0
GRANT
13,125
2,733.92
177
01 31 38 00003 0520 00001.0
LANGLEY
13,125
2,733.92
178
01 31 38 00003 0520 00002.0
DOUGLASS
10,000
2,08299
179
01 31 38 00003 0520 00003.0
DOUGLASS
10,000
2,082.99
180
01 31 38 00003 0520 00004.0
DERRICK
20,000
4,165.98
181
01 31 38 00003 0520 00006.0
STARCK
10,000
2,08299
182
01 31 38 00003 0520 00007.0
FAUST
10,000
2,082.99
183
013138 00003 0520 00008.0
WEBER
10,000
2,082.99
1l34
01 31 38 00003 0520 00009.0
LEBO
10,000
2,082.99
185
01 31 38 00003 0520 00010.0
METIVIER
13,125
2,733.92
01 31 38 00003 0520 00011.0
STRICKLER
13,125
2,733.92
186
187
01 31 38 00003 0520 00012.0
BLANK
10,000
2,082.99
188
01 31 38 00003 0520 00013.0
TARKINGTON
10,000
2,082.99
189
01 31 38 00003 0520 00014.0
TARKINGTON
10,000
2,08299
01 31 38 00003 0520 00015.0
LUDLAM
10,000
2,082.99
780
013138 00003 0520 00016.0
DALE
10,000
2,082.99
191
013138 00003 0520 00017.0
SEC OF VA.
10,000
2,082.99
192
183
01 31 38 00003 0520 00018.0
MANNOOPARAMBIL
10,000
2,082.99
194
01 31 38 00003 0520 00019.0
MORENO
10,000
2,082,99
195
01 31 38 00003 0520 00020.0
MORENO
13,125
2,733.92
1438
01 31 38 00003 0530 00001.0
WALLNER
13,390
2,789.12
197
013138 00003 0530 000020
CARROLL
10,000
2,082.99
1138
01 31 38 00003 0530 00003.0
a SHEA
10,000
2,08299
1439
01 31 38 00003 0530 00004.0
SCHOFIELD
10,000_
2,08299
01 31 38 00003 0530 00005.0
SCHOFIELD
10,000
2.08299
SEPTEMBER 1, 1998
-54-
• 0
•
200
A B
C
D
E
201
PAGE 4
202
203
PARCEL
SQUARE
204
NUMBER
ONMER
FOOTAGE AS-QFSSIUFuir
205
01 31 38 00003 0530 00006.0
HEMENWAY
10,000
2,082.99
206
01 31 38 00003 0530 00007.0
WASIELESKI
10,000
2,082.99
207
013138 00003 0530 00008.0
TORRES
20,473
4,264.51
208
013138 00003 0530 00015.0
THOMAS
10,000
2,082.99
209
01 31 38 00003 0530 00016.0
KINGSLEY
10,000
2,082.99
210
01 31 38 00003 0530 00017.0
BURTON
10,000
2,082,99
211
013138 00003 0530 00018.0
SNELL
10,000
2,082.99
212
013138 00003 0530 00019.0
SNELL
10,000
2,082.99
213
01 31 38 00003 0530 00020.0
SCHEFFLER
10,000
2,082,99
214
01 31 38 00003 0530 00021.0
SCHEFFLER
10,000
2,082.99
215
01 31 38 00003 0530 00022.0
ROVER
10,000
2,082.99
216
013138 00003 0530 00023.0
ZENNER
13,390
2,789.12
217
013138 00003 0540 00001.0
BATZER
20,000
4,165.98
218
01 31 38 00003 0540 00003.0
BARDEN
10,000
2,082.99
219
01 31 38 00003 0540 00004.0
MILLHOFF
10,000
2,082.99
220
013138 00003 0540 00005.0
BARNETT BANKS
10,000
2,08299
221
013138 00003 0540 00010.0
NICGORSKI
10,000
2,082.99
222
013138 00003 0540 00011.0
CRABTREE
10,000
2,08299
223
01 31 38 00003 0540 000120
ABD EL-HADI
10,000
2,082.99
224
013138 00003 0540 00013.0
MEISER
10,000
2,08299
225
01 31 38 00003 0540 00014.0
BRENNER
10,000
2,082.99
226
01 31 38 00003 0540 00015.0
OJEA
10,000
2,08299
227
01 31 38 00003 0540 00016.0
BURR
20,000
4,165.98
228
01 31 38 00003 0550 00001.0
CASILLO
13,750
2,864.11
229
01 31 38 00003 0550 00002.0
MACKAY
10,000
2,08299
230
01 31 38 00003 0550 00009.0
CORRENTE
10,000
2,08299
231
01 31 38 00003 0550 00010.0
MACKAY
10,000
2,082.99
232
01 31 38 00003 0550 00011.0
CASILLO
13,750
2,864.11
233
234
01 31 38 000031150 00001.0
COOK
13,125
2,733.92
235
01 31 38 000031150 00002.0
BOSSART
10,000
2,082.99
236
01 31 38 000031150 00003.0
DAMS
10,000
2,08299
237
01 31 38 000031150 00004.0
HERNDON
10,000
2,08299
236
01 31 38 000031150 00005.0
HERNDON
10,000
2,082.99
239
01 31 38 000031150 00006.0
GAUDET
10,000
2,082.99
240
01 31 38 000031150 00007.0
VAGELL
10,000
2,082.99
241
01 31 38 000031150 00008.0
VAGELL
10,000
2,082.99
242
01 31 38 000031150 00009.0
TREPICCIONE
10,000
2,082.99
243
01 31 38 000031150 00010.0
HARTLESS
13,125
2,733.92
244
01 31 38 000031160 00001.0
GRECO
10,000
2,082 99
245
01 31 38 000031160 00002.0
GRECO
10,000
2,08299
246
01 31 38 000031160 00003.0
TALBOT
10,000
2,082.99
247
01 31 38 000031160 00004.0
BOYLE
10,000
2,082.99
248
01 31 38 000031160 00005.0
BURROWS
20,000
4,165.98
249
01 31 38 00003 1160 00007.0
BLAIR
10,000
2,082.89
250
01 31 38 000031160 00008.0
MILLER
10,000
2,082.99
251
01 31 38 000031160 00009.0
GOSSELIN
10,000
2,082.99
252
01 31 38 000031160 00010.0
SANDS
10,000
2,082.99
253
01 31 38 000031170 00001.0
FAULKNER
13,125
2,733.92
254
013138 000031170 00002.0
PARR
10,000
2,082.99
255
01 31 38 000031170 00003.0
KOZDRA
10,000
2,08299
256
013138 000031170 00004.0
WATSON
10,000
2,082.99
257
01 31 38 000031170 00005.0
HARTLE
10,000
2,082.99
258
01 31 38 000031170 00006.0
KENNEY
10,000
2,08299
259
01 31 38 000031170 00007.0
BRINTON
10,000
2,082.99
260
01 31 38 000031170 00008.0
PEARSON
10,000
2,08299
261
013138 000031170 00009.0
SLAWSKI
10,000
2,082.99
262
013138 000031170 00010.0
CASAVANT
13,125
2,733.92
253
113138 00001 1240 00014.0
LACHMAN -15 ONLY
12,350
2,57249
264
11 31 38 00001 1240 00016.0
DELOMBAERDE
12,090
2,518.33
265
11 31 38 00001 1250 00015.0
NORSERG
10,000
2,08299
266
11 31 38 00001 1250 00016.0
HELVIE
10,582
2,204.22
11 31 38 00001 1290 00001.0
ATHA & SWIGER
20,473
4,264.51
SEPTEMBER 1, 1998
•
BOOK -'
-55- pga jd "-
r
n
U
8O -of
SEPTEMBER 1, 1998
-56-
loo Fait
•
B
C
D
E
287A
PAGE 5
266
PARCEL
SO JARS
269
big
OWNER
FOOTAGE ASSESSMENT
270
113138 00001 1290 00003.0
CUTRUFELLO
10,000
2,082.99
271
113138 00001 1290 00004.0
WALHEIM
10,000
2,082.99
272
113138 00001 1290 00005.0
BEWERSDORF
20,000
4,165.98
273
113138 00001 1290 00006.1
MCKINNEY
10,000
2,08299
274
113138 00001 1290 00007.0
WHITE
10,000
2,082.99
275
113138 00001 1290 00008.0
CRABB
10,000
2,08299
276
113138 00001 1290 00009.0
MARSH
10,000
2,082.99
277
113138 00001 1290 00010.0
SANZARO
10,000
2,08299
278
11 31 38 00001 1290 00011.0
VILLALBA
10,625
2,213.18
279
113138 00001 1300 00001.0
SHILOH YOUTH RAMC
13,705
2,854.74
280
113138 00001 1300 00010.0
SIGNORE
13,650
2,84328
281
113138 00001 1300 00011.0
VOLOVIK
12,350
2,572.49
282
113138 00001 1300 00012.0
FINCH
11,700
2,437.10
283
113138 00001 1300 00013.0
ADDUONO
10,400
2,166.31
254
113138 00001 1300 00014.0
DANIELS
10,400
2,166.31
265
113138 00001 1300 00015.0
PICKENS
11,700
2,437.10
286
113138 00001 13W 00016.0
CHESMORE
11,700
2,437.10
287
113138 00001 1300 00017.0
FRASCARELLI
10,400
2,166.31
288
113138 00001 1300 00018.0
SARDO
10,400
2,166.31
289
113138 00001 1300 00019.0
MATH
10,400
2,166.31
290
11 31 38 00001 13W 00020.0
PIEKOS
13,705
2,854.74
291
113138 00001 1310 00001.0
SCHOENSTEIN
10,000
2,08299
292
11 31 38 00001 1310 00002.0
SOUILLANTE
10,000
2,082.99
293
11 31 38 00001 1310 00003.0
GILLESPIE
10,000
2,08299
294
11 31 38 00001 1310 00004.0
BROWN
10,000
2,08299
295
11 31 38 00001 1310 00005.0
BROWN
10,000
2,082.99
296
11 31 38 00001 1310 00006.0
HENRIOUEZ
10,625
2,213.18
297
11 31 38 00001 1310 00007.0
UNGERBUEHLER
20,625
4,296.17
298
11 31 38 00001 1310 00009.0
PALM BAY RANCH
10,000
2,082.99
299
11 31 38 00001 1310 00010.0
PERNICE
10,000
2,08299
300
11 31 38 00001 1310 00011.0
DUNCAN
11,250
2,343.36
301
113138 00001 1310 00012.0
CRAWFORD
11,250
2,343.36
302
11 31 38 00001 1310 00013.0
BRINKLEY
10,000
2,08299
303
11 31 38 00001 1310 00014.0
VIETRI
10,000
2,082.99
304
11 31 38 00001 1310 00015.0
BESS
10,000
2,08299
305
11 31 38 00001 1310 00016.0
THURSTON
10,000
2,082.99
306
11 31 38 00001 1310 00017.0
WAKEFIELD
10,000
2,08299
307
11 31 38 00001 1310 00018.0
COX
10,000
2,08299
308
11 31 38 00001 1310 00019.0
KINNISON
10,000
2,082.99
309
11 31 38 00001 1310 00020.0
LAVIN
10,000
2,082.99
310
11 31 38 00001 1310 00021.0
LAVIN
10,000
2,082.99
311
11 31 38 00001 1310 00022.0
PASCALE
17,860
3,720.22
312
11 31 38 00001 1320 00001.0
TICE
14,375
2,994.30
313
11 31 38 00001 1320 00002.0
JONES
10,000
2,082.99
314
11 31 38 00001 1320 00003.0
HOUSTON
20,000
4,165.98
315
11 31 38 00001 1320 00005.0
BOSSHARD
10,000
2,082.99
316
11 31 38 00001 1320 00008.0
BOSSHARD
10,000
2,082.99
317
11 31 38 00001 1320 00007.0
MARVIN
10,000
2,08299
318
11 31 38 00001 1320 00008.0
ATTIS
10,000
2,082.99
319
11 31 38 00001 1320 00009.0
KING
10,000
2,082.99
320
113138 00001 1320 00010.0
CLEMENTE
11,250
2,343.36
321
11 31 38 00001 1320 00011.0
WASSERMAN
11,250
2,343.36
322
11 31 38 00001 1320 000120
KOZLOWSKI
10,000
2,082.99
323
11 31 38 00001 1320 00013.0
CLEVELAND
10,000
2,082.99
324
11 31 38 00001 1320 00014.0
WILSON
10,000
2,082.99
325
113138 00001 1320 00015.0
BROOMELL
10,625
2,213.18
326
11 31 38 00001 1320 00016.0
STUART
10,625
2,213.18
327
113138 00001 1320 00017.0
BAKER
10,000
2,08299
328
113136 00001 1320 00018.0
GIBOT
10,000
2,082.99
329
11 31 38 00001 1320 00019.0
SOLIS
10,000
2,08299
330
11 31 38 00001 1320 00020.0
LEWIS
17,424
3,629.40
331
11 31 38 00001 1330 00001.0
PARKER
16,117
3,357.15
332
11 31 38 00001 1330 00002.0
PARKER
10,000
2,082.99
333
11 31 38 00001 1330 00003.0
CRAIG
10,000
2,082.99
SEPTEMBER 1, 1998
-56-
loo Fait
•
�A
A B
PAGE 8C
D
E
335
PARCEL
OWNER
336
NUMBER
,SQUARE
FOOTAGE ASCE.
RMFMTT
337
113138 00001 1330 00004.0
KOSTENBADER
10,000
2,082.99
338
113138 00001 1330 00005.0
PETZOID
10,000
2,08299
339
113138 00001 1330 00006.0
HILL
10,000
2,08299
340
113138 00001 1330 00007.0
JOYKUTTY
10,000
2,082.99
341
113138 00001 1330 00008.0
GOODWIN
10,000
2,08299
342
113138 00001 1330 00009.0
LEE
11,250
2,343,36
343
113138 00001 1330 00010.0
LEE
11,250
2,343.38
344
113138 00001 1330 00011.0
CASS
10,000
2,082.99
345
113138 00001 1330 000120
GRAY
10,000
2,08299
346
113138 00001 1330 00013.0
MRAZEK
10,000
2,08299
347
113138 00001 1330 00014.0
HAMILTON
10,000
2,08299
348
113138 00001 1330 00015.0
LAURY
10,000
2,08299
349
11 31 38 00001 1330 00016.0
FOXWELL
10,000
2,082.99
350
113138 00001 1330 00017.0
KENNEDY
10,000
2,062.99
351
11 31 38 00001 1330 00018.0
BURT
10,000
2,08299
352
113138 00001 1330 00019.0
FULLER
10,454
2,177.56
353
11 31 38 00001 1340 00001.0
OLSON
18,295
3,810.83
354
11 31 38 00001 1340 000020
WHITE
10,000
2,08299
355
113138 00001 1340 00003.0
REED
10,000
2,08299
356
11 31 38 00001 1340 00004.0
BELVEDERE
10,000
2,08299
357
11 31 38 00001 1340 00005.0
HALLSEN
10,000
2,062.99
358
113138 00001 1340 00006.0
STEENWERTH
10,000
2,08299
359
11 31 38 00001 1340 00007.0
LEVTCHENKO
10,000
2,08299
360
11 31 38 00001 1340 00008.0
MC CARTHY
11,2
2,343.36
361
113136 00001 1340 00009.0
SMITH
21,250
4,428.35
362
11 31 38 00001 1340 00011.0
KAMAKARIS
10,000
2,08299
363
11 31 38 00001 1340 00012.0
CLAY
10,000
2,082.99
364
11 31 38 00001 1340 00013.0
CLAY
10,000
2,08299
365
11 31 38 00001 1340 00014.0
CLAY
10,000
2,08299
366
11 31 38 00001 1340 00015.0
PLEAU
10,000
2,08299
367
11 31 38 00001 1340 00016.0
PLEAD
10,000
2,08299
368
11 31 38 00001 1340 00017.0
MCGUIRE
12,632
2,631.23
369
11 31 38 00001 1350 00001.0
DE LAURA
11,2
2,343.36
370
371
11 31 38 00001 1350 00002.0
SANDBERG
10,000
2,02.9.9
11 31 38 00001 1350 00003.0
SANDBERG
20,000
4,165.98
372
373
11 31 38 00001 1350 00005.0
MCLAUGHLIN
10,000
2,08299
374
11 31 38 00001 1350 00008.0
ROMEI
10,000
2,082.99
375
11 31 38 00001 1350 00007.0
ROMEI
10,000
2,082.99
376
11 31 38 00001 1350 0000.0
LONGOBARDO
10,000
2,082.99
377
11 31 38 00001 1350 00009.0
GUEVARA
10,625
2,213.18
378
11 31 38 00001 1350 00010.0
NICHOLSON
10,625
2,213.18
379
11 31 38 00001 1350 00011.0
KOENIG
10,000
2,082.99
380
11 31 38 00001 1350 00012.0
DILEONARDO
10,000
2,082.99
381
11 31 38 00001 1350 00013.0
GEORGE
10,000
2,082.99
382
11 31 38 00001 1350 00014.0
GEORGE
11,250
2,343.36
383
11 31 38 00001 1350 00015.0
RYERSON
11,875
2,473.55
384
11 31 38 00001 1350 00016.0
MIMNAUGH
10,000
2,082.99
385
11 31 38 00001 1350 00017.0
PENELOPE
10,000
2,082.99
388
11 31 38 00001 1350 00018.0
SHAPIRO
10,000
2,082.99
387
113138 00001 1350 00019.0
HEBERT
10,000
2,08299
30
113138 00001 1350 00020.0
BENTLEY
10,000
2,08299
389
113138 00001 1350 00021.0
GEORGE
10,000
2,08299
390
11 31 38 00001 1350 00022.0
MASLOW
10,000
2,082.99
391
113138 00001 1350 00023.0
DOMAIN
10,000
2,082.99
392
113138 00001 1350 00024.0
21NSER
20,000
4,165.98
393
11 31 38 00001 1350 00026.0
DAVIS
20,000
4,165.98
394
113138 00001 1350 00028.0
HIGGINS
11,875
2,473.55
395
113138 00001 1360 00001.0
ROSELAND U METH
16,988
3,538.58
30
11 31 38 00001 1380 00002.0
PASTORE
10,000
2,08299
397
11 31 38 00001 1360 00003.0
PASTORE
10,000
2,08299
398
11 31 38 00001 1360 00004.0
JOSEPH
10,000
2,082.99
399
11 31 38 00001 1360 00005.0
-138
POWELL
10,000
2,082.99
400
11 00001 1360 00006.0
HALL
10,000
2,08299
11 31 38 00001 1360 00007.0
JOSE
10,000
2,06299
SEPTEMBER 1, 1998
-57-
•
rr�� _ ,
BOOK leo pn d2
I
0
401
A B
C
402
21,250
PAGE 7
403
PARCEL
10,000
404
NUMBER
OWNER
405
113138 00001 1360 00008.0
CRAVEN
406
113138 00001 13W 00009.0
HAVENS
407
113138 00001 1360 00010.0
SUMMERS
408
113138 00001 1360 00012.0
SUMMERS
409
11 31 38 00001 1360 00013.0
VIENNEAU
410
113138 00001 1360 00014.0
SMITH
411
113138 00001 1360 00015.0
CARNOCK
412
113138 00001 1380 00016.0
WATSON
413
113138 00001 1360 00017.0
BRUSTOWICZ
414
113138 00001 1360 00018.0
LEVER
415
11 31 38 00001 1360 00019.0
LEVER
416
113138 00001 1360 00020.0
LONG
417
113138 00001 1360 00021.0
MROZEK
418
113138 00001 1360 000220
MROZEK
419
113138 00001 1360 00023.0
CHRISTMAN
420
11 31 38 00001 1370 00001.0
PLUNKETT
421
11 31 38 00001 1370 00002.0
a BRYAN
422
113138 00001 1370 00003.0
PICCA
423
11 31 38 00001 1370 00004.0
PICCA
424
113136 WWI 1370 00005.0
HALL
425
11 31 38 00001 1370 00006.0
HALL
425
11 31 38 00001 1370 00007.0
HALL
427
11 31 38 00001 1370 00008.0
BEST
428
11 31 38 00001 1370 00009.0
FEY
429
11 31 38 00001 1370 00010.0
MILLS
430
11 31 38 00001 1370 00011.0
ALGERIA
431
11 31 38 00001 1370 000120
LASALLE
432
11 31 38 00001 1370 00013.0
PICCA
433
11 31 38 00001 1370 00014.0
REIMER
434
11 31 38 00001 1370 00015.0
CARDAMONE
435
11 31 38 00001 1370 00016.0
CARDAMONE
436
11 31 38 00001 1370 00017.0
MUKHERJEE
437
11 31 38 00001 1370 00018.0
NUTTER
438
11 31 38 00001 1370 00019.0
ROSE
439
11 31 38 00001 1370 00020.0
SHEPARD
440
11 31 38 00001 1370 00021.0
DUNCAN
441
11 31 38 00001 1380 00001.0
CETTA
442
11 31 38 00001 1380 00010.0
GAFFNEY
443
11 31 38 00001 1380 00011.0
SUM
444
11 31 38 00001 1380 00012.0
ATLANTIC GULF COM
445
113138 00001 1380 00013.0
MENDML
446
11 31 38 00001 1380 00014.0
HAVENS
447
113138 00001 1380 00015.0
MILLWATER
448
11 31 38 00001 1380 00016.0
MINKEL
449
11 31 38 00001 1380 00017.0
MINKEL
450
11 31 38 00001 1380 00018.0
WEBB
451
11 31 38 00001 1380 00019.0
WEBB
452
11 31 38 00001 1380 00020.0
BERTRAM
453
12 3138 00001 0420 00001.0
HARRIS
454
12 3138 00001 0420 00002.0
SHIELD
455
12 3138 00001 0420 00003.0
MAJACHER
456
12 3138 00001 0420 00004.0
NOLAN
457
12 3138 00001 0420 00005.0
CATALANO
458
12 3138 00001 0420 00007.0
PICANO
459
12 3138 00001 0420 00008.0
PANITZ
460
12 3138 00001 0420 00009.0
KOCIC
461
12 3138 00001 0420 00010.0
SHEARER
462
12 3138 00001 0420 00012.0
ZARICKY
463
12 3138 00001 0420 00013.0
DAWSON
464
12 3138 00001 0420 00014.0
STEDMAN
465
12 3138 00001 0420 00015.0
JUSTICE
466
12 3138 00001 0420 00016.0
JUSTICE
467
12 3138 00001 0420 00017.0
STARR
SEPTEMBER 1, 1998
-58-
NO
SQUARE. ASSESSMENT
FOOTAGE ASSESSMENT
10,000
2,082.99
10000
2,082.99
21,250
4,426.35
11,250
2,343.36
10,000
2,082.99
10,000
2,08299
10,000
2,082.99
10,000
2,08299
10,000
2,08299
10,000
2,08299
10,000
2,08299
10,000
2,08299
10,000
2,08299
10,000
2,08299
13,504
2,81287
9,583
1,996.13
10,000
2,08299
10,000
2,08299
10,000
2,08299
10,000
2,08299
10,000
2,08299
10,000
ZOV-99
10,000
2,082.99
10,000
2,08299
10,000
2,08299
11,250
2,343.36
11,250
2,343.38
10,000
2,08299
10,000
2,08299
10,000
2,082.99
10,000
2,08299
10,000
2,082.99
10,000
2,08299
10,000
2,082.99
10,000
2,082.99
23,958
4,990.43
13,663
2,845.99
13,662
2,845.78
12,362
2,574.99
11,700
2,437.10
10,400
2,166.31
10,400
2,166.31
11,700
2,437.10
11,700
2,437.10
10,400
2,166.31
10,400
2,166.31
11,700
2,437.10
12,353
2,575.20
36,050
7,509.18
19,166
3,99226
13,504
2,812.87
13,200
2,749.55
24,217
5,044.38
11,600
2,416.27
11,800
2,416.27
11,600
2,416.27
23,200
4,83254
11,800
2,416.27
11,600 .
2,416.27
11,600
2,416.27
11,600
2,418.27
11,600
2,418.27
11,600
2,416.27
ter.?r)
J FADE � 44
0
•
L-
A
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
PARCEL
NUMBER
12 3138 00001 0420 00018.0
12 3138 00001 0420 00019.0
12 3138 00001 0420 00020.0
12 3138 00001 0420 00021.0
12 3138 00001 0420 00022.0
12 3138 00001 0420 00023.0
12 3138 00001 0420 00024.0
12 3138 00001 0420 00025.0
12 3138 00001 0420 00026.0
12 3138 00001 0420 00027.0
12 3138 00001 0420 00029.0
12 3138 00001 0420 00030.0
12 3138 00001 0420 00031.0
12 3138 00001 0420 00032.0
12 3138 00001 0420 00033.0
12 3138 00001 0420 00034.0
12 3138 00001 0420 00035.0
12 3138 00001 0420 00036.0
12 3138 00001 0420 00037.0
12 3138 00001 0420 00038.0
12 3138 00001 0420 00039.0
12 3138 00001 0420 00040.0
12 3138 00001 0420 00041.0
12 3138 00001 0420 00042.0
12 3138 00001 0430 00001.0
12 3138 00001 0430 00011.0
12 3138 00001 0430 00012.0
12 3138 000010"0 00012.0
12 3138 00001 0440 00013.0
12 3138 00001 0460 00012.0
12 3138 00001 0460 00013.0
12 3138 00001 0470 00001.0
12 3138 00001 0470 00002.0
12 3138 00001 0470 00003.0
12 3138 00001 0470 00004.0
12 3138 00001 0470 00005.0
12 3138 WWI 0470 00006.0
12 3138 00001 0470 00007.0
12 3138 00001 0470 00008.0
12 3138 00001 0470 00009.0
12 3138 00001 0470 00010.0
12 3138 00001 0470 00011.0
12 3138 00001 0470 00012.0
12 3138 00001 0470 00013.0
12 3138 00001 0470 00014.0
12 3138 00001 0470 00016.0
12 3138 00001 0470 00017.0
12 3138 00001 0470 00018.0
12 3138 00001 0470 00019.0
12 3138 00001 0470 00020.0
12 3138 00001 0470 00021.0
12 3138 00001 0470 00022.0
12 3138 00001 0470 00023.0
12 3138 00001 0480 00012.0
12 3138 00001 0480 00013.0
12 3138 00001 0490 00001.0
12 3138 00001 0490 00002.0
12 3138 00001 0490 00003.0
12 3138 WWI 0490 00004.0
12 3138 00001 0490 00005.0
12 3138 00001 0490 00006.0
12 3138 00001 0490 00007.0
12 3138 00001 0490 00008.0
SEPTEMBER 1, 1998
PAGE 8
OWNER
SOSAMMA
HO
BERRY
RICHTER
PALM BAY RANCH
DOSTMOHAMED
WEBSTER
MATHIS
MCGINN
SUTTER
CRISTOFORI
FORD
BURDICK
FREELAND
QUINTERO
SNYDER
OLSZEIMSKI
ROSATO
SHAFFER
KIDD
GEHL
BOSMERA
MAJCHER
MAJCHER
HOLYK
GOSNEY
GERLACH
WADE
FLORIDA CO
CLEMENTE
HUNTER
HAVLICK
TAGNER
NICHOLES
NICHOLES
DUBBS
HI7Z
RIMKA
SULLIVAN
BLIVEN
BLIVEN
JORDAN
JORDAN
TARAYOS
SERAFIN
SPIERS
HOLIDAY BLDRS
WINEING
ABT
NCNB NAT BK OF FL
LIDDY
BENNETT
SENNETT
MAXWELL
SEARLES
WINWOOD
FRESHOUR
POHLNER
MAAS
MATTHEWS
COAKLEY
PEETS
JOHNSON
-59-
•
SQUARE_
FOOTAGE ASSESSMENT
11,600
2,416.27
11,600
2,416.27
11,600
2,41627
11,600
2,41627
11,600
2,41627
11,600
2,41627
11,600
2,41627
11,600
2,41627
17,400
3,624.40
17,400
3,624.40
11,600
2,41627
11,800
2,41627
11,600
2,41627
11,600
2,41627
11,600
2,41627
11,600
2,41627
11,600
2,41627
11,600
2,41627
12,300
2,562.08
15,872
3,306.12
20,909
4,355.32
15,639
3,257.59
11,811
2,46022
13,454
2,802.45
13,664
2,84620
10,000
2,082.99
12150
2,530.83
14,050
2,926.60
10,086
2,100.90
10,086
2,100.90
10,086
2,100.90
10,000
2,082.99
10,000
2,082.99
10,000
2,082.99
10,000
2,082.99
10.000
2,082.99
10,000
2,082.99
10,000
2.082.99
10,000
2,082.99
11,000
2,29129
10,890
2268.38
11,761
2,449.80
12,632
2,63123
10,890
2,268.38
20,890
4,351.37
10,000
2,082.99
10,000
2,082.99
10,000
2,082.99
10,000
2,082.99
10,000
2,082.99
10,000
2,082.99
10,000
2,082.99
10,000
2,082.99
10,086
2,100.90
10,086
2,100.90
11,161
2,324.83
10,000
2,082.99
10,000
2,082.99
10,000
2,082.98
10,000
2,082.99
11,000
2,29129
10,000
2,082.99
10.890
2,288.38
BOOK JUG PgE �
SEPTEMBER 1, 1998
0
m
0
A B
C
D
E
535A
538
PAGE 9
•
537
NUMBER
OWNER
FOOTAGE ASSESSMENT
538
12 3138 000010490 00009.0
SHANNON
12,632
2,631.23
539
12 3138 000010490 00010.0
MATTISON
10,890
2,268.38
540
12 3138 00001 0490 00011.0
LEARNED
10,000
2,082.99
541
12 3138 00001 0490 00012.0
TREXLER
10,000
2,082.99
542
12 3138 000010490 00013.0
DIAGIACOMO
10,000
2,082.99
543
12 3138 000010490 00014.0
DOTY
10,000
2,082.99
544
12 3138 000010490 00015.0
HABER
10,000
2,082.99
545
12 3138 000010490 00016.0
DATA
10,000
2,082.99
546
12 3138 000010490 00017.0
FAJARDO
11,161
2,324.83
547
12 3138 000010500 00015.0
POLYZOIS
10,116
2,107.15
548
12 3138 00001 0500 00016.0
YOUNG
13,508
2,813.70
549
12 3138 000010500 00017.0
YOUNG
12,500
2,603.74
550
12 3138 000010500 00018.0
SYMONDS
12,250
2,551.66
551
12 3138 000010530 00010.0
MELROV
10,000
2,082.99
552
12 3138 00001 0530 00011.0
HUNTNIK
10,890
2,268.38
553
12 3138 00001 0530 00012.0
PROF TITLE
12,632
2,531.23
554
12 3138 000010530 00013.0
KUDUK
10,000
2,082.99
555
12 3138 000010530 00014.0
LEGANT
10,000
2,082.99
556
12 3138 00001 0540 00006.0
BARNETT BANK
23,087
4,809.00
557
12 3138 000010540 00008.0
FEXISHAZY
12,500
2,503.74
558
12 3138 000010540 00009.0
FEXISHAZY
11,375
2,369.40
559
12 3138 00001 0550 00003.0
BARANSKY
10,454
2,177.55
580
12 3138 00001 0550 00004.0
SAYER
10,019
2,086.95
561
12 3138 00001 0550 00005.0
SAYER
11,325
2,359.19
562
12 3138 00001 0550 00006.0
SAYER
13,068
2,722.05
563
12 3138 00001 0550 00007.0
LANDRY
11,831
2,464.39
564
12 3138 00001 0550 00008.0
BERMAN
10,019
2,086.95
565
12 3138 00001 0560 00001.0
GORCHESS
8,930
1,860.11
566
12 3138 00001 0560 00002.0
DOUGLAS
10,000
2,082.99
567
12 3138 00001 0560 00003.0
RALPH
10,000
2,082.99
568
12 3138 00001 0560 00004.0
SPIERS
10,000
2,082.99
569
12 3138 00001 0560 00005.0
HEARNDON
10,000
2,082.99
570
12 3138 00001 0560 00006.0
NUDO
10,000
2,082.99
571
12 3138 00001 0560 00007.0
MCCARTHY
10,000
2,082.99
572
12 3138 WWI 0560 00008.0
NANKOVITCH
10,000
2,082.99
573
12 3138 00001 0560 00009.0
EMERSON
14,000
2,916.19
574
12 3138 00001 0560 00010.0
LANCE
17,382
3,620.65
575
12 3138 00001 0560 00011.0
CADAVID
10,000
2,082.99
576
12 3138 00001 0560 00012.0
a DAY
20,000
4,165.98
577
12 3138 00001 0560 00014.0
REES
10,000
2,082.99
578
12 3138 00001 0560 00015.0
KASS
10,000
2,082.99
579
12 3138 00001 0560 00016.0
WESSENDORF
10,000
2,082.99
580
12 3138 00001 0560 00017.0
MITCHELL
10,000
2,082.99
581
12 3138 00001 0560 00018.0
HORNE
10,000
2,082.99
582
12 3138 000010560 00019.0
HORNE
8,930
1,860.11
583
12 3138 00001 0570 00001.0
LYONS
18,400
3,832.70
584
12 3138 00001 0570 00002.0
JENNINGS
13,600
2,832.87
585
12 3138 00001 0570 00003.0
FEY
13,600
2,832.87
586
12 3138 00001 0570 00004.0
CALCAGNO
1300
2,832.87
587
12 3138 00001 0570 00005.0
DABERKOW
13,600
2,832.87
588
12 3138 00001 0570 00006.0
BLOSSOM
13,600
2,832.87
589
12 3138 00001 0570 00007.0
JENNINGS
15,765
3,284.04
590
12 3138 00001 0570 00009.0
EICHHOLZ
20,025
4,171.19
591
12 3138 00001 0570 00010.0
DECKER
14,125
2,942.22
592
12 3138 00001 0570 00011.0
KNICKERBOCKER
14,400
2,999.51
593
12 3138 00001 0570 00012.0
KNICKERBOCKER
14,400
2,999.51
594
12 3138 00001 0570 00013.0
KNICKERBOCKER
15,682
3,266.54
595
12 3138 00001 0570 00014.0
MATTHEWS
14,471
3,014.29
596
12 3138 000010570 00015.0
LIBBOS
21,118
4,398.86
597
12 3138 00002 0720 00001.0
COUSINS
26,250
5,467.85
598
13 3138 000031390 00001.0
TUCKER
11,197
2,332.32
599
13 3138 000031390 00002.0
TUCKER
10,000
2,082.99
800
13 3138 000031390 00003.0
FEY
10,000
2,082.99
SEPTEMBER 1, 1998
0
m
0
61
60
A B
C
PAGE 10
D
E
02
603
PARCEL
SQUARE_
604
NUMBER
OMER
FOOTAGE ASSEg.QQIENiT
605
13 3138 000031390 00004.0
FEY
10,000
2,08299
606
13 3138 000031390 00005.0
MCINTOSH
10,000
2A82.99
607
13 3138 000031390 00006.0
PICCA
10,000
2,08299
608
13 3138 000031390 00007.0
GIORDANO
20,000
4.165.98-
609
13 3138 0M31390 OD009.0
DAHL
10,000
2,082.99
610
13 3138 000031390 00010.0
KELLY
12,500
2,603.74
811
13 3138 000031390 00011.0
MC CURDY
12,500
2,603.74
612
13 3138 000031390 000120
MC CURDY
10,000
2,082.99
613
13 3138 000031390 00013.0
PICCA
10,000
2,082,99
614
13 3138 000031399 00014.0
BAILEY
10,000
2,082.89
615
13 3138 000031390 00015.0
SHAFFER
10,000
2,08299
616
13 3138 OWM 1390 00016.0
KAEDING
10,000
2,082.99
617
13 3138 000031390 00017.0
DINGER
20,000
4,165.98
618
13 3138 000031390 00019.0
HARRISON
10,000
2,08299
619
13 3138 000031390 00020.0
BALLAS
14.563
3.033.48
620
13 3138 000031400 00001.0
TOUCHBERRY
13,232
2,75621
621
13 3138 000031400 000020
BARKER
10,000
2,082.99
622
13 3138 0OW31400 00003.0
GONZALEZ
10,000
2,082.99
623
13 3138 000031400 00004.0
TAYLOR
10,000
2,082.99
624
13 3138 000031400 00005.0
CAREY
10,000
2082.99
625
13 3138 000031400 00006.0
MARKS
10,000
2,082.99
626
13 3138 009931400 00007.0
MARKS
10,000
2,082.99
627
13 3138 000031400 00008.0
VAN ANTWERP
10,000
2,08299
628
13 3138 000031400 00009.0
MISEMER
12,500
2,603.74
629
13 3138 000031400 00010.0
D' ALESSANDRO
12,500
2,603.74
630
13 3138 000031400 00011.0
ROMPOT
10,000
2,08299
631
13 3138 000031400 00012.0
GAURON
10,000
2,082.99
632
13 3138 000031400 00013.0
EVES
10,000
2,082.99
633
13 3138 000031400 00014.0
EVES
10,000
2,08299
634
13 3138 000031400 00015.0
VALENTI
10,000
2,082.99
635
13 3138 000031400 00016.0
CONNORS
10,000
2,08299
636
13 3138 000031400 00017.0
POHMER
10,000
2,08299
637
13 3138 000031400 00018.0
WATSON
16,597
3,457.14
638
13 3138 000031410 00001.0
ADAMS
11,050
2,301.70
639
13 3138 000031410 00013.0
VEENSTRA LT14 ONLY
13,748
2,863.69
640
13 31 38 000031410 00015.0
FOX
11,461
2,387.31
641
13 3138 000031410 00016.0
KARKHANIS
10,400
2,166.31
642
13 3138 000031410 00017.0
CAMPBELL
10,400
2,166.31
643
13 3138 000031410 00018.0
BLOMSTROM
10.400
2,186.31
644
13 3138 000031410 00019.0
KOVACS
10,400
2,166.31
645
13 3138 000031410 00020.0
SHEETS
10,400
2,166.31
646
13 3138 000031410 00021.0
TRUESDALE
10,400
2,199.31
647
13 3138 000031410 00022.0
RENDER
10,400
2,166.31
648
13 3138 000031410 00023.0
NCNB NAT SK OF FL
11,050
2,301.70
649
13 3138 000031410 00024.0
CARRICO
11,050
2,301.70
650
13 3138 000031410 00025.0
ATLANTIC GULF COM
10,400
2,166.31
651
13 3138 000031410 00026.0
ATLANTIC GULF COM
10AW
2,166.31
652
13 3138 000031410 00027.0
PENELOPE
11,700
2,437.10
653
13 3138 000031410 00028.0
ADAMS
11,700
2,437.10
654
13 3138 000031420 00001.0
SANTORI
10,210
2,126.73
655
13 3138 000031420 00001.1
EVES
10,000
2,082.99
656
13 3138 000031420 00002.0
EVES
10,000
2,082.99
657
13 3138 000031420 00003.0
MEJIA
10,000
2,082,99
658
13 3138 000031420 00004.0
MCGUIRE
10,000
2,08299
659
13 3138 000031420 00005.0
GERBER
1215W
2,603.74
660
13 3138 000031420 00006.0
GERBER
10,000
2,082.99
661
13 3138 000031420 00007.0
CAPPELLUTI
10,000
2,08299
662
13 3138 000031420 00008.0
REYES
21,048
4,384,28
663
13 3138 000031430 00001.0
SANDERS
11,612
2,418.77
664
13 3138 000031430 00002.0
BLEDSOE
10,625
2,213.18
665
13 3138 000031430 00003.0
WILKINSON
10,625
2,213.18
666
13 3138 000031430 00004.0
PRIETO
11,250
2,343.36
867
13 3138 000031430 00005.0
DEFELICE
11,761
2.449.80
SEPTEMBER 1, 1998
-61- BOOK GE i
I
888
A B
PAGE 11C
D
E
669
670
PARCEL
SQUARE
671
SER
OWNER
FOOTAGE
ASSESSMENT
672
13 3138 000031430 00006.0
DEFELICE
13,068
2,72205
673
13 3138 000031430 00007.0
SHARR
11,2
2,343.36
674
13 3138 000031430 00008.0
LAUGHLIN
11,250
2,343.36
675
13 3138 000031430 00009.0
TRAPP
12,197
2,540.62
676
13 3138 000031440 00001.0
RENZI
10,000
2,08299
677
13 3138 OW031440 00002.0
DENARDO
10,000
2,08299
678
13 3138 000031440 00003.0
WRIGHT
11,250
2,343.36
679
13 3138 000031440 00004.0
FAZIO
16,117
3,357.15
680
13 3138 000031440 00005.0
CUMMINS
16,117
3,357.15
681
13 3138 000031440 00006.0
MASI
10,000
2,082.99
682
13 3138 000031440 00007.0
MCCLURE
10,000
2,082.99
683
13 3138 000031440 00008.0
COSCO
10,625
2,213.18
684
13 3138 000031440 00009.0
WIDNER
20,909
4,355.32
685
13 3138 000031440 00011.0
ROY
10,454
2,177.56
686
13 3138 000031440 000120
WALTERS
10,625
2,213.18
687
13 3138 000031440 00013.0
PESTA
10,625
2,213.18
888
13 3138 000031440 00014.0
PORTER
10,000
2,082.99
689
13 3138 000031440 00015.0
MRAZEK
10,890
2,268.38
690
13 3138 000031440 00016.0
DEHAAS
10,890
2,268.38
691
13 3138 000031440 00017.0
CICCOTTO
10,890
2,268.38
692
13 3138 000031440 00018.0
BONOFIGUO
11,173
2,327.32
693
13 3138 000031440 00019.0
BONOFIGUO
10,000
2,082.99
694
13 3138 000031450 00001.0
KAROL
10,166
2,117.57
695
13 3138 00031450 00002.0
MENDES
10,000
2,08299
698
13 3138 000031450 00003.0
VORRATH
10,000
2,08299
697
13 3138 000031450 00004.0
PICCA
10,000
2,082.99
698
13 3138 000031450 00005.0
MCGIVERN
10,000
2,082.99
699
13 3138 000031450 00006.0
DAUKAS
10,000
2.082.99
700
13 3138 000031450 00W7.0
SMIGIEL
10,000
2,08299
701
13 3138 000031450 00008.0
GROME
10,000
2,08299
702
13 3138 000031450 00OD9.0
FRAPPIER
10,000
2,08299
703
13 3138 000031450 00010.0
DAVIS
13,005
2,708.93
704
13 3138 000031450 00011.0
PANAYOTTI
10,625
2,213.18
705
13 3138 000031450 000120
PANAYOTTI
11,250
2,343.36
706
13 3138 00003 1450 0W13.0
PANAYOTTI
11,250
2,343.36
707
13 3138 WW31450 00014.0
PANAYOTTI
11,250
2,343.36
708
13 3138 00003 1450 00015.0
GREGORY
11,427
2,380.23
709
13 3138 OW031450 00016.0
MANN
13,700
2,853.70
710
13 3138 000031450 00017.0
MANN
15,118
3,149.06
711
13 3138 000031450 00018.0
MANN
11,250
2,343.36
712
13 3138 000031450 00019.0
FISCHER
10,000
2,082.99
713
13 3138 000031450 00020.0
LINDSTROM
10,000
2,082.99
714
13 3138 00003 1450 00021.0
FOX
10,000
2,082.99
715
13 3138 000031450 00022.0
FOX
10,000
2,082.99
716
13 3138 000031450 00023.0
LATORRACA
10,000
2,082.99
717
13 3138 000031450 00024.0
CUNNINGHAM
10,000
2,082.99
718
13 3138 000031450 00025.0
VANDEVOORDE
10,165
2,117.57
719
13 3138 000031460 00001.0
CAFFREY
10,890
2,268.38
720
13 3138 000031460 00002.0
PRIETO
10,000
2,082.99
721
13 3138 000031460 00003.0
CONNER
10,000
2,082.99
722
13 3138 000031460 0W04.0
ATTIS
10,000
2,082.99
723
13 3138 000031460 00005.0
GL4MBANCO
20,000
4,165.98
724
13 3138 000031460 00W7.0
FORSBACH
14,810
3,084.91
725
13 3138 000031460 00008.0
CAMPBELL
15,003
3,125.11
726
13 3138 WW3 1460 00009.0
CIDLOWSKI
10,790
2,247.55
727
13 3138 000031460 00010.0
RITCHIE
11,464
2,387.94
728
13 3138 000031460 00011.0
SANDERS
11,870
2,47251
729
13 3138 000031460 000120
MCLAUGHUN
10,000
2,082.99
730
13 3138 000031460 00013.0
CAMPONE
10,000
2,08299
731
13 3138 000031460 00014.0
BARBOSA
10,000
2,082.99
732
13 3138 000031460 00015.0
FRAGA
10,000
2,082.99
733
13 3138 000031460 00016.0
TERZA
10,000
2,082.99
734
13 3138 00003 1460 00017.0
CORDREY
22,820
4,753.38
SEPTEMBER 1, 1998
ip 0
9.A.4. SECOND PUBLIC HEARING - RESOLUTION 98-088 -
EXPANSION OF THE COUNTY SEAT - TAX
COLLECTOR
SEPTEMBER 1, 1998
PRESS -JOURNAL
Published Daily
Vero Beach, Indian River County, Florida
COUNTY OF INDIAN RIVER: STATE OF FLORIDA
Before the undersigned authority pay appeared Darts K Hicks who an
oath says that he is President of the Press Journal, a ddy newspaper pubflstted at Vero Bead►
In Indlon River County, Florida; dwt the athwhad copy of fit, big
in the Court, was pub-
lished in said newspaper in the In of W LI 1W I U 15,11QQ R r
Affiant ka0a says that the said Press4oumel is a newspaper pubBshed at Vero Beach, In
said Ulan River County, Florida, and 00 the said newspaper has heretofore bowl
confinuously published In second class rre0 rtaitto at the post bdan office In V� BF epi In �ddtr� Rk Comty, Florida, has bow entered a,
for a period of one year nerd preca ft the first publication of the attached copy of
and of ant further says that he has rreither paid nor promised any parson, firm
ortion any dWcamt, rebate, conrrrission or refund for the purpose of securing #*
i
corporation
oAtcation In said newspaper.
'1 ONV- V f q - ♦
p����� 1
1•• aW in to and sir before day 1
* ' M1 C0MMI5S0N EUIIiS •: � '+K/• •
IAR01fl01,1001
z : COMM. 110.011017 w i
of
M CoCommbissonce.J¢(oryd'a
Exp. J 1,2001
Comm. No. CC 611003
Personally Kmmn Uaf Produced ID
TYPO 10 Produced
600K 106 PAGE 1 ,2 6
A B
C
D
E
735
PAGE 12
736
PARCEL
SQUARE_
737
SFR
-OWNER
FOOTAGE
ASSESSMENT -
-
738
739
13 3138 000031470 00001.0
CROCKER
10,454
2,177.56
740
13 3136 000031470 000020
FERGUSON
10,000
2,082.99
741
13 3138 000031470 00003.0
MASON
10,000
2,082.99
742
133138 1470 00004.0
SIMIGRAN
10,000
2,08299 ,
743
13 3138 000031470 00005.0
LAAKEN
12,800
2,666.23
744
13 3136 000031470 00006.0
RAMIREZ
14,007
2,917.64
745
13 3138 000031470 00007.0
GIAMBANCO
10,000
2,082.99
746
13 3138 000031470 00008.0
CONWAY
10,000
2,082.99
747
13 3138 000031470 00009.0
ESSES
10,000
2,08.2.99
748
13 3136 000031470 00010.0
JUSTICE
10,000
2,06299
749
13 3138 000031470 00011.0
HILL
17,424
3,629.40
750
13 3136 000031490 00001.0
HARTLESS
13,088
2,71205
751
13 3138 000031490 00002.0
SMITH
11,761
2,449.80
752
13 3138 000031490 00003.0
WILDERN
11,761
2,449.80
753
13 3138 000031490 00004.0
REID
11,761
2,449.80
754
13 3138 000031490 00003.0
SNYDER
12,632
2,631.23
755
13 3138 000031490 00006.0
ROBY
12,632
2,631.23
756
13 3138 000031490 00007.0
SPOSATO
11,761
2,449.80
757
13 3138 000031490 00008.0
WILLIAMS
11,761
2,449.80
758
133136 000031490 00009.0
MATTHEWS
12,632
2,631.23
759
13 3138 000031490 00010.0
RIVERA
12,632
2,631.23
760
13 3138 000031490 00011.0
CLUNIES
11,761
2,449.80
761
133136 000031490 000120
ATTIS
11,761
2,449.80
762
13 3138 000031490 00013.0
VICKERS
12,632
2,631.23
763
13 3136 000031490 00014.0
LAIELLI
12,632
2,631.23
764
13 3138 OOD031490 00015.0
LAIELLI
23,958
4,990.43
765
13 3138 000031490 00017.0
JOHN
12,197
2,540.62
766
13 3138 000031490 00018.0
LEOTTA
12,197
2,540.62
767
13 3138 000031490 00019.0
RAYNOR
12,197
2,540.62
768
13 3138 000031490 00020.0
GROZA BLDRS
12,197
2,540.62
769
13 3138 000031490 00021.0
HARTLESS
18.930
3.943-10
770
771
TOTAL ESTIMATED PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT
1,714,277.33
772
773
TOTAL ESTIMATED SQUARE FOOTAGE TO
8,229,895
774
BE ASSESSED
9.A.4. SECOND PUBLIC HEARING - RESOLUTION 98-088 -
EXPANSION OF THE COUNTY SEAT - TAX
COLLECTOR
SEPTEMBER 1, 1998
PRESS -JOURNAL
Published Daily
Vero Beach, Indian River County, Florida
COUNTY OF INDIAN RIVER: STATE OF FLORIDA
Before the undersigned authority pay appeared Darts K Hicks who an
oath says that he is President of the Press Journal, a ddy newspaper pubflstted at Vero Bead►
In Indlon River County, Florida; dwt the athwhad copy of fit, big
in the Court, was pub-
lished in said newspaper in the In of W LI 1W I U 15,11QQ R r
Affiant ka0a says that the said Press4oumel is a newspaper pubBshed at Vero Beach, In
said Ulan River County, Florida, and 00 the said newspaper has heretofore bowl
confinuously published In second class rre0 rtaitto at the post bdan office In V� BF epi In �ddtr� Rk Comty, Florida, has bow entered a,
for a period of one year nerd preca ft the first publication of the attached copy of
and of ant further says that he has rreither paid nor promised any parson, firm
ortion any dWcamt, rebate, conrrrission or refund for the purpose of securing #*
i
corporation
oAtcation In said newspaper.
'1 ONV- V f q - ♦
p����� 1
1•• aW in to and sir before day 1
* ' M1 C0MMI5S0N EUIIiS •: � '+K/• •
IAR01fl01,1001
z : COMM. 110.011017 w i
of
M CoCommbissonce.J¢(oryd'a
Exp. J 1,2001
Comm. No. CC 611003
Personally Kmmn Uaf Produced ID
TYPO 10 Produced
600K 106 PAGE 1 ,2 6
w,wr�e�rww�f� ws�i.•w �
'sc101aIa1.3t
0
Ucr ,
INDIAN R •IMVa nE' .R" •PLAZA 63
PJl1 63073
x—Naar Its Ind in4 the County �'e�
16�47% tea. Seat to nalude theLuriare area for the
office of the Tax ?A +o
collector 7A! AC I
Y
PLAZA
AT
PA1 U -N
V E R 0
Y
Dow.
41
,—I c,4, 0
BOOK .0 FAG -t d 6
a•h \ \'� 1«.d W NOTICE I
Subject: Expansion of County Seat - Public Hearings
The Board of County Commissioners of Indian Rim County, Florida, hereby provides notice of two public hearings; the first set for 9:05 am. on
Tuesday, August 18, 1998 and the second one set for 9:05 a.m. on Tuesday, September 1, 1998, the County Commission Chamb6rs in the County
Administration Building, 1840 25th Street, Vero Beach, FL 32960, to discuss a proposed resolution relating to an Expansion of the Boundaries of the
County Seat to encompass the Proposed New Office of the Tax Collector located in the Luria's Plaza.
Interested parties may appear at the meeting and be heard with respect to the proposed property exchange. Anyone who wants to inspect any
proposed documents may do so at the offices of the Tax Collector and the Board of County Commissioners.
Anyone who may wish to appeal any decision which may be made at this meeting will need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is
made, which includes testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is based.
Anyone who needs o,speciai accommodation for this meeting may contact the County's Americans With Disabilities Act (ADA) Coordinator at
567-8000, Ext. 223 at least 43 hours In advance of the meeting.
July 22, August 5, 1998 _ 1390793r
SEPTEMBER 1, 1998
•
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of August 25, 1998:
TO: Board of County Commissioners
FROM: Charles P. Vitunac, County Attorney
DATE: August 25, 1998
RE: Public Hearings for the
Expansion of County Seat
The Board of County Commissioners at its meeting July 14, 1998, directed that
our office advertise for public hearings on the possible expansion of the County
seat to include the area of the proposed new office of the Tax Collector. The
dates for these public hearings are August 18, 1998, and September 1, 1998.
Recommended Action: At the end of the second public hearing, if the Board so
desires, the attached resolution may be adopted which would expand the
County seat to include the area proposed by the Tax Collector for his new office.
County Attorney Vitunac announced that this is the second public hearing to allow
the Board to expand the County Seat to provide for the Tax Collector's new office in the
Luria's Plaza. If the Board does not approve the expansion, the Tax Collector will have to
maintain his principal office in this building and have a branch office at Luria's Plaza.
The Chairman opened the public hearing and asked if anyone wished to be heard
regarding this matter.
Frank Coffey, 88 Cache Cay, Vero Beach, urged the Board not to expand the County
Seat at this time but to wait until the space needs assessment has been completed.
Clinton Scott, 1926 Ocean Drive, Vero Beach, felt the Board should refuse to expand
the County Seat and curb the Tax Collector in some way.
SEPTEMBER 1, 1998
•
UO
-65- BOOK
Property Appraiser David Nolte, 900 Royal Palm Place, Vero Beach, believed the
Board's decision today will decide for generations of taxpayers whether all County services
will be provided in one location or at various locations. Mr. Nolte handed out the following:
Aoa 0 V\_�
,:.'-,--county,* service.c.ente:r ens
SJ.:.1 ,SSS 5� 'tit
kf:By:71FFANYSMERLO '
1 •.. ., _ �
t ...;
Ifa called the SL'Johns County:•Seivlce
:o
.. i
,:,.. r •.i
occupational licenses
' Sin1f �d'tesi:',_ ' " ; E" ;' '" "
° Center. Along with -die tax colledtor'nnd piop,
and automobile tng reg- i
t3etintlon: d't •' ° , :,•t�' a5 • ,:. , .�.r.'
c>'tM % r: : "_.
V Wn�k Into 'new
ert a iatscr,'the facility holds, offices for the
Y .PP. i Y.
'•"The plan is, to have a one-sto she said
P P "
. tha -St. Johns' County
Service :Center, and" you'll first notice the
Guardian Ad Litem, n. court-nppointcd child
advocate program; construction services: and. •
,
'1vinhr: .'; ",•' ;":` "`' ` `' " "'
" Mahr'said•shb'd like. to remind people that
brightness of.tho.pjace..;4:,
With: plenty of windows, the.sun. filtered
the county switchboard., : '
St. Johns County residents had an opportu-
,..
: there is parlci g -behind :the building with
handicapped,spaccs:;.i',..ii;
into the new home of the St. Johns County Tax
Collector and Property Appraiser offices. '
nity to tour the facility Friday from.9 a.m..to I
; :.::
" "It's not being ujed," she said. • .
hes . an open; • airy feeling," said Pat
':
p.m. The.open.house attracted nbout 150 pco-
plc, said.Propcity Appraiser Sharon Outland,
.The Property_Appralser.s,OM66 is located
on the second , loor.:And• Outland suggested
Milli, .`executive Wniinistrator' with the: Tax
Tlie fust Boor of the building is devoted to
that residents. coinel to -'the front desk to be
Collector's Office.: :'
Both offices from the downtown
the Tax Collector's Office, rite county switch-
directed'to any'de'partment'they need in her
.moved
Casa Monica Building to rite Administration
board, construction services and the Guardian
Ad Litem offices." " ' " , " -
office. `'`` "''%
Otitland.said'sfie:d iike to remind residents
Complex at 4030 Lewis Speedway in early
January.
.... The Tax Collector's Office includes ser-
that the filing. deadline'for;hhomestead ezemp-
L;< .
vices like driver's license, real estate permits,
a.•.; , ,, ..
tion is March l: ` •" ` ' '
ENTRY
------------------------------------------
-----------
SEPTEMBER 1, 1998
FLOOR PLAN
•
PHILIP S. STEEL A.1 A. ARCHITECT
Kul Zimmermann, C F.C., Tax Collector May 29,1998
Indian River County
Vero Beach. FL 32961
Fax #561-770-5009
R Additions & Remodeling, Luria's Plaza Vero 19cuh, FL
Pea Mr, Zirnmemann:
On May 19, 3996 the following oonitruetion bids were received for the above referenced project. All contractors
based their bids on drawings, specifications and addendum prepared by this office. The biddtxs wens prc-qualified
and enjoy Bn excellent reputation.
The list of bidding contractors and proposals are as follows:
Bill Bryant & Assooistes. Inc. 5296,804.00
Metropolitan construction, Inc. $296.950.00
BatthConstrucdon, Inc. $322,993.00
Parent construction 5323,420.00
The low bidder is Bill Bryant tit Awoeiates and will be awarded tho contract when executed. The bidders were
instructed to divide their bids based on an aara ment between the Tax Collector and the landlord, Stoltz Proporty
Management.
Stoltz Property Management financial obligation is to construct an additional 2100 square feet adjoining and wost of
the caisting apace, all circ work. and remodeling the existing space into like new coaditioA. The Tax Collector is
responsible for all interior partitions, cabinetry and built-ins, carpet, wall finishes, signage, additional hmudicapped
plumbing, special electrical and HVAC requirtmenu.
Construction cost division foe lasxllard/imm is as follows:
Landlord $13),000.00
Tenant 1162,004.00
Tota 5245,804.00
I hope this synopsis is satisfactory. Any questions, plea 1.
sincerely 2
illy
AAA, tees
Pss/rf
1010 ttAlaaa'laww natvs. svt F617 p1 iCs. FLORID >94144 - $61-113.1312 FAX $41-M-11111
A I R C TRX CILIECTO2 Fax :561-770-5009 - 3un 2 '98 12:57 P.04
Since we do not have Board of County Commission approval at this time, the
initial use would be for non -county business only, hence two employees
remaining at the Administration building pending Board approval.
Additional concern Is the fact that 12% of my main office work force had been
diagnosed with Carpal Tunnel Syndrome and I have a responsibility to configure
work stations ergonomically to reflect the continuously Increasing time spent on
computer terminals. None of our work areas meet standards complying with
ergonomic needs.
Additional cost considerations include the following:
Monthly
Rent
p4,95B.33
CAM
752.50
Taxes
1,073,33
Utility Bill
400.00 Est.
Janitorial Service
350.00 Est.
Pest Control
40.00 Est.
Window Cleaning
25.00 Est.
SEPTEMBER 1, 1998
-67-
•
BOOK JOS FaGE r ���
HOOK 100 DUE dt�
If further information or clarification is needed, please contact me.
cc: Board of County Commissioners
Mr. Nolte noted that Mr. Zimmermann had been in business with the architect, Bill
Bryant, and felt that the Board should be aware of that. He believed that Mr. Zimmermann
would initiate new charges on license plates to pay for this move and quoted from Mr. Spock
that "the needs of many outweigh the needs of the few or the one".
Tax Collector Zimmermann responded that the Tax Collector has the option to charge
a branch fee of 75¢ which he believed was being done in every county in the state. He
continued that he had not made a decision at this time to implement that fee.
Commissioner Adams asked Mr. Zimmermann to comment on the selection of the
builder, and Mr. Zimmermann. responded that he had not been involved in the bid process.
The architect handled all of the contractor interviews and the bid process.
Commissioner Ginn noted that Mr. Zimmermann had previously appeared before the
Board and told them he had already agreed to the rental terms but had not asked the Board
for permission to move his offices.
Mr. Zimmermann responded that he had already negotiated the terms at that time but
had not signed a lease prior to asking the Board's permission which he has done in private
conversations with the Commissioners and in presentations before the Board.
Commissioner Ginn also noted that, in conversations with Mr. Zimmermann, he had
stated that he did not have enough space in the current Administration Building, yet had
twice stated publicly that the move was not about space, but about efficiency. She felt that
County Attorney Vitunac had made it clear that no constitutional officer can move out of the
county seat without the Board's approval, yet Mr. Zimmermann had made plans to move out
with no specific request to the Board. She believed that a "no" vote at this point would
inconvenience the public; however, she felt that Mr. Zimmermann needs to be wherever the
Board is and her vote would be that he- must move back when final plans are made for
additional space for county offices.
SEPTEMBER 1, 1998
The Chairman asked if there were anyone else who wished to be heard regarding this
matter. There being none, the Chairman closed the public hearing.
Commissioner Grin wanted the record to show that she is only supporting this action
because it is in the public interest.
ON MOTION by Commissioner , Macht,
SECONDED by Commissioner Eggert, the Board
unanimously adopted Resolution 98-088 expanding
the boundaries of the County Seat to encompass the
proposed location of the Tax Collector's new office
in Luria's Plaza.
RESOLUTION NO. 98- 88
A RESOLUTION OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY,
FLORIDA, EXPANDING THE BOUNDARIES OF THE
COUNTY SEAT TO ENCOMPASS THE PROPOSED
LOCATION OF THE TAX COLLECTOR'S NEW OFFICE
IN LURIA'S PLAZA.
WHEREAS, Section 30.10, Florida Statutes, requires that the place of
office of every County officer shall be at the County seat of the County; and
WHEREAS, the proposed new location of the office of the Tax Collector is
just outside the boundaries of the City of Vero Beach, which is the County seat;
and
WHEREAS, the County seat may be expanded pursuant to Section 138.12,
Florida Statutes;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that the geographic
location of the County seat is hereby expanded beyond the corporate limits of the
City of Vero Beach to include the location of the proposed new office of the Tax
Collector of Indian River County, the location of which is more particularly shown
on the attached Exhibit "A."
After two public hearings held on August 18, 1998, and September 1, 1998,
the resolution was moved for adoption by Commissioner Macht , and the
motion was seconded by Commissioner F g g e r t ___,and, upon being put to
a vote, the vote was as follows:
Chairman John W. Tippin
Aye
Vice Chairman Kenneth R. Macht
Aye
Commissioner Fran B. Adams
Aye
Commissioner Carolyn K. Eggert
Aye
Commissioner Caroline D. Ginn
Aye
SEPTEMBER 1, 1998
-69- BOOK IN PAGE -13
BOOK FAGr d��
The Chairman thereupon declared the resolution duly passed and adopted
this 1st day of September, 1998.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
Attests
By �/
JoWWW. Tippin
Je ey anon, Cie Chairman
d2 • / maw arm co 9
Att /ire -'
Exhibit °A" (area tch) AdMin.
Legal
Buagal
17TH STREET _ ... — _*0_0 I WO-*
�t `t 6000
NEW aoi<OOa o otq °too
000mo
r_3
.8Z AC AC AC .00 AC I jAC F
.1
go—
INDIAN R.1VE'R' PLAZA
TRACT 11
P.B.I. 10-073 1
63
• ; X -HART Re: Expanding the 'County UHLIX-VALCREEN
4715 1 „A. Seat to include the "B"
It Luria's area for the
-�iey� Q Office of the Tax 7.68 AC
17 Collector
7.09 AC I
W le
CI .Y._ I? V QBE C
20 o T H E P L A Z A
o '
•A P
0 A T
0
o P& 12-019
O
0 000oao 0000
O 84 AC t>!
O a iau
o
0
o CO)•
o a
o
oaaw
V E R 0
EXHIBIT ^ p^
000W
0000
000U&
381 AC
AC y 00000
00000 00000 a0000
06o000O]iA 3mn°,Min � ew.00,°,°.-.i ,fVMI
SEPTEMBER 1, 1998
.1 _9
27
FU0
is
43 A,
8
n
3
I 17
19
19
20 1 22
23 24
2`
27
28
29
30
31
32 �1 oo°0°Ooo�
SUB
P.B.I 03-
l
;
INDIAN R.1VE'R' PLAZA
TRACT 11
P.B.I. 10-073 1
63
• ; X -HART Re: Expanding the 'County UHLIX-VALCREEN
4715 1 „A. Seat to include the "B"
It Luria's area for the
-�iey� Q Office of the Tax 7.68 AC
17 Collector
7.09 AC I
W le
CI .Y._ I? V QBE C
20 o T H E P L A Z A
o '
•A P
0 A T
0
o P& 12-019
O
0 000oao 0000
O 84 AC t>!
O a iau
o
0
o CO)•
o a
o
oaaw
V E R 0
EXHIBIT ^ p^
000W
0000
000U&
381 AC
AC y 00000
00000 00000 a0000
06o000O]iA 3mn°,Min � ew.00,°,°.-.i ,fVMI
SEPTEMBER 1, 1998
.1 _9
27
FU0
is
43 A,
8
n
3
•
9.B. PUBLIC DISCUSSION - STUART AND DEBORAH SEGAL -
APPEAL OF A COUNTY ADMIMSTRATOR'S DECISION -
QUASI-JUDICIAL
The Board reviewed an undated Memorandum:
TO: James Chandler
County Administrator
Di . 'on Head Concurrence:
j Ls. /�
Robert M. Keating,
Community Development'Director
4.S
FROM: Stan Boling, AICP
Planning Director
SUBJECT: Appeal by Stuart and Deborah Segal of a County Administrator's Decision
It is requested that the data herein presented be given formal consideration by the Board of County
Commissioners at its regular meeting of September 1, 1998.
BACKGROUND AND CONDITIONS:
On August 11, 1998, Community Development staff received an appeal from Stuart and Deborah
Segal of a county administrator's decision rendered on August 4, 1998. The administrator's decision
was in response to the Segals' appeal of public works staff and planning staff decisions. The matter
in contention involves the effect of a Murphy Deed Reservation on the Segal's property located at
407 S.W. 434 Avenue (see attachment #1). The Segals propose to construct a detached garage on
their property, about 2-3 feet from the edge of a Murphy Deed Reservation line. It is staff s position
that none of the existing Murphy Deed Reservation area should be released and that the area is to be
treated as road right-of-way. Thus, staff s position is that the front yard setback required on the
Segals' property (25 fat in this case) should be measured from the Murphy Deed Reservation line.
It is the Segals' contention that the county shoud treat the reservation area like a drainage and utility
easement and measure the required setback from the easternmost property line indicated on the
Segals' deed.
Ifthe Segals' opinion prevails, then the Segals could build the garage where it is presently proposed
(immediately west of the Murphy Deed Reservation line). If staffs opinion prevails, then the
proposed garage location would need to be moved 22-23 fat farther west, so as to provide a 25 foot
setback from the Murphy Deed Reservation line. Please refer to attachment #2.
•Murphy Deed Reservations
In the 1930's, large acreages of land were vested in the State of Florida due to unpaid taxes.
Subsequently, the State, when it issued deeds back to private owners, reserved unto itself 100' of
right-of-way on each side of the center line of any abutting state road that was in existence as of the
date of the deed. The State's practice of reserving these rights-of-way was based upon the 1937
Murphy Act. Such reservations are known as Murphy Deed Reservations.
During the 1939s, 40s, 50's, and 60's, when the State issued deeds with the reservations, there were
a number of roads under state jurisdiction. Many roads that were State roads in the past, and for
which Murphy Deed Reservations were established, are now county roads. One such road is 431d
Avenue. Although 43'd Avenue is now a coup y road, there are Murphy Dad Reservations over
some of the properties that abut it.
SEPTEMBER 1, 1998
-71- BOOK i0o PAGE 7.35
BOOK 10F'�Gr tl P
It should be noted that, even along county roads, the State alone has the authority to release Murphy
Deed Reservation area The release request process involves formal application with the State. The
State seeks county public works staff input for any release adjacent to a county road. It has been the
State's practice to release reservation area along county roads, if the county supports such a release.
Thus, the county has significant influence regarding such release requests.
.Segal Property
In 1944, the State issued a deed for the subject property. That deed contained a Murphy Deed
Reservation that covered the eastern 75' of the subject property. In 1974, the State released the west
40' ofthat reservation. The result is that the east 35' ofthe subject property (equivalent to 60' from
the center line of 43' Avenue tight -of -way) is covered by a Murphy Deed Reservation.
•Chronology of Events
The Segals' grievance arises from their attempt to have a detached garage built at their residence.
The chronology of that project is as follows:
Ednncary 16, 1998: On behalf of the Segals, builder Art Garcia applied for a building permit
for a proposed two car detached garage. The submitted plot plan contained no survey or
setback dimensions or information.
Through the normal review process, planning staff (Eric Blad) checked for compliance with
setback requirements. By redlining the plot plan, plamiing staff noted that a 15' minimum side
yard setback is required and a 25' minimum front yard setback from the right-of-way is
required. Planning staff also noted that a form board survey would be required prior to
construction (pouring slab and vertical construction).
A • le: At the request of the Segals, the Board of County Commissioners reconveyed a
10' strip of 43`a Avenue right-of-way to the Segals. That 10' strip overlapped the 60' wide
Murphy Deed -of way mon area and was considered redundant by staff since the
Murphy Deed area is treated as right-of-way. The Board's action specifically stated that the
reconveyance "...has no effect on the 60' Murphy Deed reservation..." It appeared at that
time that all parties were aware of the 60' wide reservation right-of-way area.
' June 10' Building permit is issued to the builder with setback notes. Site is prepared.
June I V� Formboard survey is submitted, showing for the first time Murphy deed right-of-
way information and an apparent encroachment of the proposed garage into the 25' from yard
setback. Staff puts project on hold and contacts builder.
` Building, Planning, and engineering staff communicate with the builder and owners.
June 17"': Planning Director Stan Boling firms and mails letter to Stuart Segal outlining
setback requirements and options. One option includes requesting release of Murphy Deed
right-of-way.
* June 18th' Stuart Segal faxes a response to Stan Boling.
' Am 12; Stan Boling faxes and mails a response to Mr. Segal's response.
' July 2nd: Public Works Director Jim Davis sends a letter to Segals stating that the county
cannot release any Murphy Deed right-of-way.
' July 10`6: Segals send letter of appeal to County Administrator James Chandler.
' Auger 4e: James Chandler sends letter to Segals denying appeal and upholding staff's
position.
' 11'' Community Development Department staff sends response letter to Segals and
schedules appeal for September 1° Board of County Commissioners meeting.
In summary, the Segals seek to have the Board grant their appeal to overturn staff's decision and
allow the Murphy Deed Reservation area that covers the eastern 35' of their
property to Boum as
setback area. Pursuant to the
Provisions of county code section 100.06 (attached), the Board of
County Commissioners is to consider the appeal and grant or deny it, with or without conditions.
ANALYSIS
Generally, the facts of the case are not in dispute. The dispute relates to the county's policy of
trenting Murphy Deed Reservation areas the same as road rights-of_way.
SEPTEMBER 1, 1998
-72-
•Segall' Position
It is the Segals' opinion that the reservation area should be treated like the county treats other
easements (e.g. drainage and utility easements), and allow the reservation area to count toward
meeting setback requirements. With respect to the subject property, the Segals' opinion is that the
required 25' from yard setback should fall within the 35' wide reservation area and a building could
be constructed right up to the reservation line. According to the Segals' appeal, their opinion is based
primarily on the following:
1'olicY County policy currently treats many types of easements (e.g. drainage and utility) as
creditable for meeting setback requirements. Therefore, it would be consistent to allow
Murphy Deed Reservation area to count as setback area, since the reservation is a type of
easement.
2. The LDRs. The LDRs state that setbacks are measured from lot lines, not easements. The
proposed garage is set back 35' from the Segals' front lot line. Thus, the 25' minimum
setback is satisfied as measured from the front lot line.
The issued building permit. Issuance of the building permit indicated to the Segals that
construction ofthe garage could proceed. The Segals relied upon that issuance to clear trees
and prepare the site for construction. Now, construction is not allowed to occur.
• Staffs Position
It is staff s position that the county cannot support release of any remainingtodsting Murphy Deed
Reservation area covering the Segals' property. All of the remaining reservation area is needed to
satisfy the county's right-of-way needs for 43'4 Avenue. The Thoroughfare Plan and LDRs call for
100' of 43`d Avenue right-of-way. The reservation area on the Segals' property, added to dedicated
43'd Avenue right-of-way, yields only 85' of the 100' of needed right-of-way. Therefore, all remaining
reservation area must be retained. Given these facts, there appears to be no dispute regarding the
county's decision that it cannot support a release of any more reservation area.
It is also staffs position that the remaimaglexisting Murphy Deed Reservation area covering the
subject property should be treated as a road right-of-way and that required building setbacks,
including the setback that applies to the proposed garage, should be measured from the reservation
line. Staffs position is supported by the following:
Past and == RLha Over the last few years, the county has sought to research, ider *,
and assert its Murphy Deed Reservation rights. For site plan projects affected by Murphy
Deed Reservation areas, such areas have been treated as rights-of-way, and setbacks have
been applied and measured from the reservation line. When reviewing a reservation release
request, the county'. s policy is to retain only reservation area needed to meet right-of-way
standards. Thus, in making reservation release decisions the county equates reservation area
with right-of-way area In addition, in April the county released previously dedicated right-
of-way that overlapped a portion of the subject reservation area That action was taken
because the dedication was considered redundant. The county's opinion was that the
underlying reservation was the same as right-of-way.
2. The LDRs and safety. Although the LDRs do not specifically address the effects of Murphy
Act Reservation areas on setbacks, staff s position is consistent with the LDRs. Under the
LDRs, the mon area fits the definition for street right-of-way, and street right-of-way
is defined as the beginning point for measuring front yard setbacks. Such setbacks ensure a
standard separation between roadways and structures. Without adequate separation,
structures looted close to road rights-of-way can "hide" vebicles from view of motorists on
adjacent roadways. Garages and other structures built up to tight -of -way livres could hide
vehicles that are exiting directly onto road rights-of-way.
3. The approved hAdingpe = plot Pian. Although the building permit plot plan submitted for
the garage did not depict any 43' Avenue right-of-way nor any Murphy Deed Reservation
area, the permit was approved with two conditions noted on the plot plan:
a A 25' minimum setback from right-of-way is required.
b. A formboard survey is required prior to construction.
The first condition provided the appropriate setback requirement. The second condition
required specific survey information as a final check for setback compliance prior to
construction.
SEPTEMBER 1, 1998
-73-
BOOK 100 FAGS i T
Fr -
Bog
4. Consistent result. Treating acquired rights-of-way and Murphy Deed Reservation areas the
same in regard to setbacks will result in consistent setbacks along roadways. Such
consistency ensures a minimum area of open space/green area along roadways between
buildings and pavement. Treating reservation areas differently would result in varied building
setbacks along many roadways where segments of acquired right-of-way adjoin segments of
reservation area The segment of 474 Avenue adjacent to the Segals' property is such a
segment. For f pure 43'd Avenue improvements, the county will need to acquire right"f-way
adjacent to the subject reservation area On those adjacent sites, structures will not be
allowed to be built up to the right-of-way line as now proposed by the Segals.
*Board Options
The matter before the Board is not specifically addressed in the LDRs. In staffs opinion, the matter
involves two issues. One is the county's Murphy Deed Reservation policy, while the other is whether
or not the Segals relied on county action to their detriment. Based on these two issues, the Board
could:
1. Affirm the existing county policy of treating reservation areas as rights-of-way for setback
purposes, and deny the appeal (upholding the County Administrator's decision).
2. Affirm the existing county policy, but permit the appeal based on a finding that county actions
were relied upon by the Segals to their detriment.
Change county policy to treat reservation areas as easements that can count toward meeting
setback requirements, and grant the appeal.
The Board can attach conditions to any decision made.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners affirm cu: rent county policy regarding
Murphy Deed Reservation areas and deny the appeal (upholding the County Administrator's
decision).
SEPTEMBER 1, 1998
-74-
• 0
0
1ST ST SW - — — --*A —
TRA
i
i
RS -6
r � �
lilt 11
_.,..
LU
RS-3� f�
DEUCE C-uRT - TQy2,
WEST SIDE i�•-• -
77
J
amum
(� -
a
SUBDIVISION ;~
s �
(GA a T A
• s
s s
s : (
SEPTEMBER 1, 1998
-75- BOOK JOGFAGE73
12.1
14
IS
16 IT Is
a
a
—�` NO
19
f
1 13
II X11 3
31 22
20
Uii
12
;i
30 23
21
29 24
10 Z
28 25 O
~ 9
N
N
.1.1
27 26
I
i
N
3
6 S 4
TRA
I
..................
Subject Property
i
I
i
I
1
N
TRA
i
i
RS -6
r � �
lilt 11
_.,..
LU
RS-3� f�
DEUCE C-uRT - TQy2,
WEST SIDE i�•-• -
77
J
amum
(� -
a
SUBDIVISION ;~
s �
(GA a T A
• s
s s
s : (
SEPTEMBER 1, 1998
-75- BOOK JOGFAGE73
PROPOSED: -
/
_.G
ARAGE
60' Murphy Act
Deed Reservati(
Y, 43RD AVE R -O -W (DEDICATED)
i
60'Murphy Act
Deed Reservation
y 43M AVE R -O -W (DEDICATED)
SEPTEMBER 1. 1998
-76-
setback
a
35'
Box
1:,FROPOSI
1: GARAGI
i
60'Murphy Act
Deed Reservation
y 43M AVE R -O -W (DEDICATED)
SEPTEMBER 1. 1998
-76-
setback
a
35'
Box
Planning Director Stan Boling reviewed the facts for the Board and noted that a 10 -
foot right-of-way was previously dedicated to the County by the Segals. That right-of-way
has been returned by the County and the Segals believed that any setback situations had been
taken care of by the return of that right-of-way. The state advises that Murphy Deed
easements should be treated like drainage easements. Staff's position is that the policy of
the County is to treat the Murphy Deed Reservation as a road right-of-way. The Segals'
building permit has a 25 -foot setback noted but it was not until June of this year that staff
saw the relationship between the garage and the Murphy Deed Reservation. This will not
be a problem until the 43'd Avenue road widening is done when the probability arises of
purchasing right-of-way from neighbors on either side of the Segals. If 431 Avenue road
work is completed, there would only be 5 to 10 feet to this structure.
Responding to questions bythe Commissioners, Director Boling noted that one option
to prevent this occurrence in the future would be to do more title work countywide to see
what Murphy Deed Reservations remain in place.
Attorney Bruce Barkett explained that all of the reservation had previously been
released except for about 60 feet. He did not believe there was a safety issue as there will
only be a sidewalk next to the garage. The Segals will use their existing driveway and in
good faith had relied on the information they received at the time of their applications which
indicated they would be able to put the garage in that location.
Glenn Legwen, 5900 5" Street SW, suggested that the Murphy Deed matter be put
on a future agenda and discussed thoroughly.
Staff was directed to come back with recommendations to make sure this doesn't
happen again.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams,
SECONDED by Chairman Tippin, the Board
unanimously affirmed the current County policy
regarding Murphy Deed Reservation areas; but
permitted the appeal based on a finding that county
actions were relied upon by Stuart and Deborah
Segal to their detriment.
SEPTEMBER 1, 1998
-77- BOOK u FnE,d
r, ";, p :� I
BOOK DPAGE d �
9.C. PUBLIC NOTICE ITEMS - PUBLIC HEARING ON
SEPTEMBER 8.1998 REGARDING COUNTY PURCHASE OF
SIX OF NINE PARCELS IN THE "ROUND ISLAND SOUTH"
LAAC SITE - COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL LANDS
PROGRAM
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of August 25, 1998:
TO: James E. Chandler
County Administrator
DEPARTMENT HEAD CONCURRENCE:
Robert M. Keating AICPr
Community Developr irector
FROM: Roland M. DeBlois, CP
Chie£ Environmental Planning
DATE: August 25, 1998
SUBJECT: Notice of Scheduled Public Hearing
It is requested that the data herein presented be given formal consideration by the Board of County
Commissioners at its regular meeting of September 1, 1998.
Please be advised that the following public hearing has been scheduled for Board consideration at
its September 8, 1998 meeting:
Approval of County Purchase of Six of Nine Parcels in the "Round Island South" LAAC
Site Under the County Environmental Lands Program
The above referenced public hearing daze is provided for the Board of County Commissioners'
information. No action is needed.
NO ACTION REQUIRED OR TAKEN.
10. CHILDREN'S SERVICES NETWORK ASSETS MAPPING -
ANALYSIS OF NEEDS ASSESSMENT - SUMMARY OF AGENCY
APPLICATION - RECOMMENDATIONS FOR FUNDING FOR
FISCAL YEAR 1998-99
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of August 26, 1998:
SEPTEMBER 1, 1998
TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS — - -
DATE: August 26, 1998
SUBJECT: Childrens Services Network
Assets Mapping - Analysis of Needs Assessment - Summary of Agency
Application - Children Services Network Recommendations for Funding,
FY 1998-99
FROM: Children Services Network - Kenneth R. Macht, Chairman
It is requested that the attached agenda item be given formal consideration by the Board of
County Commissioners at its regular meeting of September 1, 1998.
Children Services Network contracted with Hershberg Salter Associates to do a study and
prepare a needs assessment analysis and assets mapping for presentation to the Board of County
Commissioners. The results of the study are presented.
It is recommended by the Children Services Network that the Board approve funding of the
seven (7) agencies listed in the packet.
GRANT COMMITTEE EVALUATIONS ,
Community Child Care Resources
Substance Abuse Council
Cultural Council
Hibiscus Children Center
Exchange Club Castle
Assn. of Retarded Cid tens of MC
Samaritan Cent
Healthy Start Coalition P/T Social Worker
Healthy Start Father Support
Healthy Start 6 Scholarships
Economic Opportunity Council
Children Home Society
Red Cross
ALPI Children Family Support Services
TOTALS. ...........................
SEPTEMBER 1, 1998
-79-
BOQK0 - V Lisp
Amount
Amount
Points
Requested
Recommended
86
$91,226
S 811560
78
531240
3000
78
29,275
29,275
84
25,000
25,000
78
30,000
30,000
77
38,700
-0.
87
60,714
40,476
78
13,104
4)-
69
28,000
40.
82
4,819.50
(49819.50) withdrawn
75
50,000
501000
73
20,000
40-
0
27,000
-0-
0
50,000
-0-
S 5214178.50
S294,311
-79-
BOQK0 - V Lisp
r
BOOK N FACS / i
MOTION WAS MADE by Commissioner Eggert,
SECONDED by Commissioner Macht, that the
Board approve the funding as recommended by the
Children's Services Network as follows: Community
Child Care Resources, $81,560; Substance Abuse
Council, $38,000; Cultural Council, $29,275;
Hibiscus Children's Center, $25,000; Exchange Club
Castle, $30,000; Samaritan Center, $40,476;
Economic Opportunity Council, $50,000; and accept
the Mapping of Assets prepared by Hershberg Salter
Associates.
Rose Gaines, a member of the CSN, noted that she had served on the subcommittee
for the report. She believed that after the subcommittee structure was formulated, the CSN
had allowed people to be on subcommittees without public notification. There was no
publicly accountable process to approve members and she felt that was a weakness in the
final outcome of the project. You get people who either know someone on the committee
or people that have an interest in the fee and bid service area. She felt the outcome was at
odds with the results of the survey where people felt that drug and alcohol abuse was the
main concern. She did not believe the survey reflected a scientific approach and felt the
asset mapping was very limited. The process used took less than 1 hour and did not involve
any discussion or debate. She believed the needs assessment was based more on people's
experiences than on a scientifically accurate assessment.
Dr. Hulda Grubman, 55 Live Oak Lane, felt that many people approved the CSN
with the understanding that an objective survey would be performed. She believed the group
worked hard but was not sure what basis they used for favoring one applicant over another.
She hoped they would keep limits in mind.
Jim Granse felt that "children" is being used as a password for organizations to get
a lot of money. He believed there are excellent people on the committee but wanted to see
more organization of the applicants.
0
SEPTEMBER 1, 1998
-80-
0
Dr. Roger Dearing, Superintendent of Schools, Indian River County School District
noted that the committee had sent a survey to every elementary child's home, ministerial
associations and every civic and service organization. He felt that the County now has much
more information than before and noted that all volunteers to serve on the needs assessment
committee were accepted.
Elizabeth Young, 720 Delaware Avenue, Ft. Pierce, noted that she is associated with
a subsidized child care facility which submitted a proposal to the CSN and was not
recommended for funding. She asked the Board to please reconsider the 2 programs in
Gifford which are not being funded.
Jean Kline, Health Department Administrator, stated that she has been involved in
the CSN and recommendations were made based on the results of the telephone and mailed
surveys. She emphasized that she would stand behind the report and the work that had been
done.
Rolf Bibow, a member of the CSN, stated that he was very proud to be a part of this
excellent program. He has seldom seen such dedication and felt that a wonderful start has
been made.
Mrs. Aquilla Moore, of Moore's's Child Care and Pre -School, invited everyone to
visit their center which has been serving the public for over 20 years.
Chris Altman, Samaritan Center, noted that the bottom line is that children do not
have a voice of their own and we need to stand up for these little voices not otherwise heard.
She felt we could all benefit from spending a week or two living with the tremendous
challenges these families face, especially the children being raised by people who are not
functionally able to provide the needed skills. She believed the CSN still has a lot of
growing to do but felt it was not unreasonable to allow at least 5 years for growth. She _
believed it is important for everyone to know that one individual's influence can make a
dramatic, lasting change in the world. Children are our future and the public's support is
critical.
Commissioner Ginn emphasized that she is not opposed to helping children but felt
it is necessary to point out flawed processes. She expressed her appreciation for the work
that has been done.
SEPTEMBER 1, 1998
BOOK
-81-� f;�1fc
r
BOOK 100 m i`4".,
Commissioner Macht noted that the process was certainly flawed but they had been
given a small amount of money and time to work with. A number of citizens gave up a lot
of valuable time. He stated that he was not aware until this time that Mrs. Aquilla Moore
and Mrs. Essie Turner's child care facilities were not included but felt that they were
certainly deserving of support and would probably be funded during the budget process.
This is a huge "fire" and time will show us where we need to concentrate our efforts. He
recounted incidents at a recent camp for at -risk children where one child went into hysterics
when told that the camp would end and another where he drove one of the children to her
home to pick up a bathing suit because the mother had stated she had no transportation, only
to find when he arrived that the mother was in no condition to drive but had 3 vehicles
available.
THE CHARWAN CALLED THE QUESTION and
the Motion passed by a 4-1 vote (Commissioner
Ginn opposed).
1 LA. 1. RESOLUTION 98-089 - JUNGLE TRAIL
CONSERVATION AREA (CAIRNS/IRWIN TRACT)
MANAGEMENT PLAN - APPOINTMENT OF ADVISORY
GROUP AS REQUIRED BY STATE PROCEDURES
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of August 25, 1998:
TO: James E. Chandler
County Administrator
TMENT HEAD CONCURRENCE:
Robert Keating, A� ;
Community Develop jm��fnt Director
FROM: Roland M. DeBloisf'AICP
Chief, Environmental Planning
DATE: August 25, 1998
SUBJECT: Appointment of an Advisory Group for Review of the Jungle Trail
Conservation Area (Cairnshrwin Tract) Management Plan, as Required
by State Procedures
It is requested that the information herein presented be given formal consideration by the Board of
County Commissioners at its regular meeting of September 1, 1998.
SEPTEMBER 1, 1998
�
Background
On April 2-1, 1997, the Board approved hiring Bellomo-Herbert and Company, Inc. (subcontracted
by FloridAffinity. Inc,) to draft a management plan for the Cairns tract. The ±104 acre Cairns trt.
located on south Jungle Trail, was purchased in October, 1996 under a 50150 cost -share agreement ac
with the State Conservation and Recreation Lands (CARL) program, whereby the State obtained title
to the property. On January 14, 1997, the Board of County Commissioners approved a lease
agreement with the State for the County to manage the Cairns tract. The County and State have
since purchased the ±8 acre oceanfront Irwin tract contiguous to and south of the Cairns tract, and
the leasetmanagement agreement has been extended to include the Irwin tract. The combined Cairns
and Irwin tracts are now referred to as the "Jungle Trail Conservation Area."
Bellomo-Herbert has completed a draft management plan that is currently under review by county
staff. County staff expect the draft will be finalized in the next few weeks for review and
consideration by the Board and the general public.
State Advisory Group Requirement
State legislation enacted in 1997 (amending Section 259.032(10) F.S., attached) requires that
individual management plans for properties purchased under the CARL program be developed with
input from an advisory group. Moreover, Section 259.032(10) provides that:
"Members of this advisory group shall include, at minimum, representatives of the lead
land managing agency, co -managing entities, local private property owners, the
appropriate soil and water conservation district, a local conservation organization, and
a local elected officiaL"
Section 259.032(10) further provides that the advisory group must conduct at least one advertised
public hearing, with a management prospectus made available to the public for a period of 30 days
prior to the public hearing.
This matter is herein presented for the Board to consider appointing an advisory group for
input on the development of the Jungle Trail Conservation Area Management Plan, in
fulflUment of state states- requirements.
Bellomo-Herbert, thus far in the course of its development of the draft management plan, has
coordinated with residents adjacent to the subject property (e.g., Sea Oaks residents), as well as with
county residents with expertise on various subjects (i.e, County Historian Ruth Stanbridge; ELC
Director Holly Dill; Native Plant Society President Janice Broda). In fact, the contract with Bellomo-
Herbert specifically states that the consultant will meet with the following people (see attached):
• Sea Oaks [Condominium] Association representative(s)
• Holly Dill, Director, Environmental Learning Center
• Janice Broda, President, Florida Native Plant Society
• Jim Thomas, Biologist
• Ruth Stanbridge, Indian River County Historian
• General Manager of the Disney Resort
• Roland DeBlois, County Chief of Environmental Planning (staff advisor)
The informal group listed above nearly fulfills the state advisory group criteria, absent a
representative of the Indian River Soil and Water Conservation District and an elected local official
(county commissioner). Another adjacent property owner who has expressed interest and has been
consulted is Mr. Chad Kelly, who owns property to the south of the Cairns Tract along Jungle Trail.
Staff suggests that the above referenced list be built upon to fulfill the state advisory group
requirement, by adding the following representatives:
• County commissioner
• Jim Romanek, County Parks Superintendent (staff advisor)
• Representative of the Indian River Soil and Water Conservation District
Representative of Island Club Homeowners Association
Representative of the Pelican Island Audubon Society
• Chad Kelly
Dr. "Skip" Barkett (owner ofJungle Trail Apartments)
Although this suggested advisory group is fairly large (12 members plus two staff advisors),
appointment of the group would ensure appropriate representation of interested parties.
SEPTEMBER 1, 1998
-83- BOOR PAGE d
r-
0
-.1. -^J I
rr�� , Ate)
BOOK .� 0 PAGE d Llb
Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners appoint an advisory group for review
of the Jungle Trail Conservation Area Management Plan as discussed herein. Moreover, staff
recommends that the Board direct staff to contact the listed entities and request that each designate
a representative for the advisory group, as applicable.
Igor . �•.aT
a *+e sno• I . '
�o.aer.
i
WAMMO
. �w«ac.. ' . . . '
'i
. . . . . . . . .
.-.-.-.-.*. . . ....... .....
. . . . . . . ,M...pC* . . .
.•..«... .. ... .-.
•. .t
• ......
. . . .. . . . .. . ..
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
.. .
. .
.. ..
i'_'. _'.' '.. _'.'.•...
....
.'. '.'.' .............Ru.
Q n 7XACT-j
for A PAW.
SEPTEMBER 1, 1998
-84-
am) ftxwfta�
am) waroens- - w accaeoa.
To .ura+aC IMN40oR
ao•Q440W
nu engin.&- - IN twglr.�
To WAMM&C,
Co0MM�
nu mWIRA.
JUNGLE TRAIL
CONSERVATION
AREA
MANAGEMENT PLAN
NATURAL
COWUNRI£S
INUAKWOMEW
� M. ��••� Qa: st1RE 1
IMT f. Me
71a
p^p
0 W aw aw SOC
10FAW
FIGURE a
0
ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert,
SECONDED by Commissioner Macht, the Board
unanimously adopted Resolution 98-089 establishing
an Advisory Group for review of the Jungle Trail
Conservation Area Management Plan with the
entities as recommended and appointed
Commissioner Kenneth R. Macht as Chair.
Resolution No. 98 - 8 9
A RESOLUTION OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY ESTABLISHING
AN ADVISORY GROUP FOR REVIEW OF THE JUNGLE TRAIL
CONSERVATION AREA MANAGEMENT PLAN
WHEREAS, Section 259.032, Florida Statutes, requires that individual management plans
for properties purchased under the State Conservation and Recreational Lands (CARL) program be
developed with input from an advisory group; and
WHEREAS, the County is in the process of having a management plan developed for a
CARL purchased property now known as the Jungle Trail Conservation Area;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, THAT:
Section 1. Pstabkic_hment
The Indian River County Jungle Trail Conservation Area. Advisory Group
is hereby established.
Section 2. Membership
The Advisory Group shall have twelve voting members appointed by the Board of
County Commissioners. The initial membership shall be as follows:
• County commissioner (serving as chair to the advisory group)
• Representative of the Sea Oaks Condominium Association
• Representative of the Environmental Learning Center
• Representative of the Florida Native Plant Society
• Representative of the Indian River Soil and Water Conservation District
• Representative of Island Club Homeowners Association
• Representative of the Pelican Island Audubon Society
• Representative of the Disney Beach Resort
• Indian River County Historian
• Chad Kelly (adjacent property owner)
• Dr. "Slip" Barkett (adjacent property owner)
• Jim Thomas, Biologist
SEPTEMBER 1, 1998
-85-
BOOK 0 PAGE
F,
BOOK 106 FA"GE _i jui
Resolution No. 98- 8 9
Staff advisors (non-voting):
• Roland DeBlois, County Chief of Environmental Planning
• Jim Romanek, County Parks Superintendent
Section 3. Term of Office
The term of office shall be until the review is completed, at which time the Advisory
Group will be terminated.
Section 4. Power and Duties
The Advisory Group shall have the power and authority to carry out its obligation
under Section 259.032, F.S., and any other related statutory requirement.
Section 5. Ad�A' Sta +s
This Group shall be advisory only and the members shall serve without
compensation.
Section 6. General Provisions
The provisions of County Code Chapter 103, relating to advisory boards and
commissions, shall apply to this Advisory Group.
This Resolution shall become effective immediately upon adoption.
THE RESOLUTION was moved for adoption by Commissioner
Eggert , the motion was seconded by Commissioner M a c h t , and
upon being put to a vote, the vote was as follows:
Commissioner John W. Tippin
A y e
Commissioner Kenneth R. Macht
Aye
Commissioner Fran B. Adams
Aye
Commissioner Carolyn K Eggert
Aye
Commissioner Caroline D. Ginn
Aye
The Chairman declared the resolution duly passed and adopted this 1 day of
September, 1998.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
gy _
o W. Tippin, Ch
t:
Clerk--ZL BURTON ,
w:\USEnsaow D\L AAC\CAERNSWv_rcLv,pa
SEPTEMBER 1, 1998
1 '^1
,t. APPROVED AS TO FORM
AND L GAL SUFFICIENCY
6Y ERRENCE P. O'BRIEN r
,,ASST. COUNTY ATTORNEY
-86-
•
11.A.2. RESOLUTION 98-090 - REVISING INDIAN RIVER
COUNTY LOCAL HOUSING ASSISTANCE PLAN
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of August 26, 1998:
TO: James E. Chandler
County Administrator
D N HEAD CONCURRENCE:
Cobert A Keating,
Community Development t
FROM: Sasan Rohani. AICP
Chief, Long -Range Planning
DATE: August 26, 1998
SUBJECT: REVIEW AND CONSIDERATION OF REVISED INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
LOCAL HOUSING ASSISTANCE PLAN
It is requested that the data herein presented be given formal consideration by the Board of Count%
Commissioners at its regular meeting of September 1, 1998.
DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS
Background
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 420.907, F.S., the State Housing Initiatives Partnership
Program (SHIP), and Rule 9I-37.005, Florida Administrative Code (FAC), the Board of Count%
Commissioners approved the Indian River County Local Housing Assistance Plan (Ordinance #93-
13) on April 6. 1993. In June, 1993, the Florida Housing Finance Corporation approved the county's
plan and authorized the disbursement of SHIP funds.
According to a 1993 amendment to Rule 9I-37.005(2), Florida Administrative Code, the county must
periodically submit a new Local Housing Assistance Plan to the Florida Housing Finance
Corporation. Accordingly, the county's plan was revised in 1994 and 1997.
On March 11, 1997, the Board of County Commissioners adopted resolution #97-16. which
approved the county's revised 3 year plan for FY 97-98, FY 98-99, and FY 99-2000. The Florida
Housing Finance Corporation then approved the county's revised plan on April 21, 1997, and
authorized the disbursement of SHIP funds until June, 2000. The plan, however, can be amended
as needed Since 1997, the plan has been revised several times to modify some of the local housing
assistance program requirements or to enact some minor clean up changes to the pian. The last set
of revisions to the plan was done in July 1998.
While implementing the plan, the county must ensure that all state requirements and local
requirements are met. One of the state requirements is that at least 30% of the funds be utilized by
very_ low income households. Because very low income households have credit and income
problems, it is difficult for many such households to qualify for SHIP downpayment/closing cost
loans. Consequently, it is difficult to maintain the 30% minimum SHIP allocation to very low
income households. For that reason. staff recently re -assessed the county's Local Housing
Assistance Plan to determine if any changes could be made to increase the amount of SHIP funds
provided to very low income households.
Based on this assessment, staff determined that one way to increase the number of very low income
SHIP applicants would be to provide an incentive for very low income households to apply for SHIP
rehabilitation funds. One such incentive would be to provide SHIP rehabilitation funds to very low
income households as grants instead of loans. This is consistent with what many other SHIP
programs do. By providing rehabilitation funds to very low income households as grants. applicants
need not meet minimum credit requirements, so more very low income households can qualify for
SHIP funds.
SEPTEMBER 1, 1998
-87-
0
BOOK JOGFAGC AlraA
Fog JUGFaGE �d
The proposed changes to the plan are discussed in the next section of this report. If approved. these
changes will ensure that the county will continue to meet state requirements for percent of SHIP
funds used by very low income persons. These changes will also provide an additional mechanism
to maintain the stock of existing owner occupied units.
Revisions
In the revised plan, additions to the plan are shown as underlined, and deletions are shown as sWke-
tlff�i. The revisions are as follows:
o Provide for a new rehabilitation grant strategy for very low income persons
o Enact several minor clean-up changes to the existing plan.
A copy of the revised Indian River County Local Housing Assistance Plan is attached to this staff
report.
ANALYSIS
The revised plan meets all state and local requirements. As revised, the Local Housing Assistance
Plan still provides the basic framework and operating procedures for the SHIP program. As such.
the Local Housing Assistance Plan includes SHIP program strategy qualification requirements and
other provisions. The revised plan also provides for rehabilitation grant assistance, a change which
will provide an incentive for very low income homeowners to make needed repairs to their homes.
The revised plan identifies all rehabilitation work activities permitted under the rehabilitation loan
strategy and under the rehabilitation grant strategy.
Due to credit problems, many very low income persons cannot qualify for rehabilitation loan
assistance. A significant number of those are elderly citizens who own homes that need
rehabilitation. With the proposed rehabilitation grant, very low income persons can fix their homes
using grant funds. The proposed rehabilitation grant will apply only to the rehabilitation work
activities needed to make a house safe for habitation and/or to maintain the house's structural
integrity. As proposed, the applicant must occupy the assisted unit for at least ten years; otherwise
grant funds must be paid back.
On August 13, 1998, the county's affordable housing partnership group reviewed and approved the
above referenced recommended changes to the local housing assistance plan. By revising the plan.
the Board of County Commissioners can enhance maintenance of the existing affordable housing
stock, reduce deterioration of existing units, upgrade existing substandard units to code, make
deteriorated housing safe for habitation, and make sure that state requirements are met.
ALTERNATIVES
With respect to the proposed revisions to the Local Housing Assistance Plan, the Board of Countv
Commissioners has three alternatives. These are:
To adopt the revised plan
To adopt the revised plan with changes
To reject the revised plan
Staff supports either of the first two alternatives.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners adopt the attached resolution approving
the revised Indian River County Local Housing Assistance Plan and direct staff to submit two copies
of the revised plan to the Florida Housing Finance Corporation for its review and approval.
SEPTEMBER 1, 1998
—88—
ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert,
SECONDED by Commissioner Adams, the Board
unanimously adopted Resolution 98-090 amending
the County's Local Housing Assistance Plan for FY
1998-99 and FY 1999-2000.
LOCAL HOUSING ASSISTANCE PLAN FOR FY 1998-99 AND FY 1999-2000 IS ON FILE IN THE
OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
RESOLUTION NO 98 -.UL
A RESOLUTION OF TBE BOARD OF COUNTY CONNISSIONERS OF INDIAN
RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA AMENDING THE COUNTY'S LOCAL HOUSING
ASSISTANCE PLAN FOR FY 1998-99, AND FY 1999-2000.
WHEREAS, Chapter 420, Florida Statutes, describes the State
Housing Initiative Partnership Program (SHIP), and states that the
principal objective of that program is to increase the amount of
affordable housing within the State of Florida; and
WHEREAS, on April 6, 1993, Indian River County approved
ordinance number 93-13, establishing the Local Housing Assistance
Program; and
WHEREAS, the current county's Local Housing Assistance plan
expires on June 30, 2000; and
WHEREAS, the staff and the affordable housing partnership
group have recommended changes to the county's local housing
assistance plan; and
WHEREAS, on September 1, 1998, the Board of County
Commissioners considered proposed amendments to the county's Local
Housing Assistance Plan;
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners
of Indian River County, Florida that:
Section 1.
The above recitals are ratified in their entirety
Section 2.
The attached Indian River County Local Housing Assistance Plan
for FY 1998-99, and FY 1999-2000 is hereby amended by the
Board of County Commissioners. Changes are included on the
attached pages of the Local Housing Assistance Plan. On the
SEPTEMBER 1, 1998
-89-
BOOK , FAGr d JJ
a� ��yy aTgP'r
BOOK .�Ll.� u � j'_1
attached pages of the Local Housing Assistance Plan, additions
are shown as underlined, and deletions are shown asnt3FIke-
thL%.
Section 3.
The Board of County Commissioners directs staff to submit two
copies of the Indian River County Local Housing Assistance
Plan to the Florida Housing Finance Corporation by certified
mail. A minimum of one of the two copies shall bear the
original signature of the authorized official.
Section 4.
The county shall continue utilizing ten percent (10%) of
available SHIP funds for administration of the SHIP program.
Section 5.
The county's maximum assistance from SHIP funds will be
thirty-nine thousand dollars ($39,000.00) per unit, and the
average assistance will be fourteen thousand dollars ($14,000)
per unit.
Section 6.
The following table indicates the average and maximum per unit
SHIP funds allowable for each strategy:
STRATEGY
AVERAGE LOAN AMOUNT
MAXIMUM LOAN AMOUNT
Impact Fee Grant
51000.00
7,500.00
Impact Fee Loan
51000.00
7,500.00
Downpayment/Closing
10,000.00
15,000.00
Cost Loan
Rehabilitation Loan
14,000.00
20,000.00
Rehabilitation Grant
14,000.00
20,000.00
Land Acquisition
7,500.00
10,000.00
Loan
Land Bank -Market
7,500.00
10,000.00
Purchase Loan
Land Bank -Tax Deed
7,500.00
10,000.00
Purchase Loan
The foregoing resolution was offered by Commissioner Eggert ,
and seconded by Commissioner Adams and being put to a vote,
the vote was as follows:
Chairman, John W. Tippin Aye
- Vice Chairman, Kenneth.R. Macht Aye
Commissioner, Caroline D. Ginn Ay e
Commissioner, Carolyn K. Eggert •A -re
_ - — Commissioner, Fran B. Adams Aye
SEPTEMBER 1, 1998
-90-
I
The Chairman thereupon declared the resolution duly passed and
adopted this 1st day of September, 1998.
Board of County Commissioners
of Indian River County
By.
Jo . airman
Jeffrey K. Barton
C erje�� AD t
APPROVED AS TO FOUN AND LEGAL SUpplCIENCY
BY:
,William G. Collins, Ii
Deputy County Attorney
u\v\h\housing.res
SEPTEMBER 1, 1998
-91-
BOOK 106 FaGE i
W% '1,00 'FAGE 1136
11.B. HURRICANE EVACUATION PROCEDURES AND
PUBLIC INFORMATION
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of August 26, 1998:
TO: Board of County Commitssioners
FROM: Doug Wright, Director
Emergency Services
DATE: August 26, 1998
SUBJECT: Hurricane Evacuation Procedures and Public Information
At the request of a County Commissioner, I will present a short presentation to the Board on
September 1, 1998, pertaining to information related to hurricanes as follows:
Hurricane Categories : Saffir-Simpson Scale
Actions to be taken during Hurricane Watch vs. Hurricane Warning
County Emergency Operations Center coordination activities (Emergency Support
Functions)
Regional & State coordination of evacuation routes and information
Public Access channel 13 & 35 (Routinely Monday & Thursday) (Every day during threat
at 6:00PM)
Protective Actions
Public notification
Television cable override
800 MHZ communications system
Evacuation Routes
Shelter Information
Damage assessment requirements
Re-entry into damaged areas
Web Site (www.h=.com)
Hurricane presentations by staff (estimated 120 this fiscal year)
Availability of hurricane awareness information (hurricane preparedness tape broadcast
prior to season)
Hopefully, this information will be of value to citizens who may be unfamiliar with the above
information and procedures and staff submits that efforts to educate the public in this regard will
continue to be paramount in the Department's planned activities.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams,
SECONDED by Commissioner Eggert, this itemwas
deferred until September 8, 1998.
SEPTEMBER 1, 1998
-92-
•
H.C. BID AWARD: ANNUAL CONTRACT #9015 FOR
SECURITY SERVICES - SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL
DISTRICT
MOVED TO ITEM 14.B.3.
11.H. RESOLUTION 98-091- FLORAVON SHORES
SUBDIVISION PETITION FOR WATER SERVICE (110TH
STREET) - FINAL ASSESSMENT
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of August 24, 1998:
DATE: AUGUST 24, 1998
TO:
JAMES E. CHANDLER
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
FROM:
DONALD R. HUBHS, P.E.
DIRECTOR OF UTILITY SE
PREPARED
1
JAMES D. CHASTE+�
AND STAFFED
MANAGER OF SMENT PROJECTS
BY:
DEPARTMENT OF UTILITY SERVICES
SUBJECT: FLORAVOR SHORES SUBDIVISION PETITION FOR
WATER SERVICE (110'= STREET)
nwIAN RIVER COUNTY PROJECT NO. UW -97 -10 -DS
RESOLUTION IV - FINAL ASSESSMENT
On October 28, 1997, the Indian River County Board of County Commissioners
approved Resolution III, No. 97-136, for the preliminary assessment roll on the
above -referenced project. Construction of the project has been completed.
Customer connections have begun, and we request the Board of County
Commissioners' approval of the final assessment roll. (See attached minutes
and Resolution III.)
ANALYSIS
The preliminary assessment was for a total estimated cost to be assessed of
$36,700.00, which equated to $0.101386 per square foot of property owned.
The final assessment (see attached Resolution IV and the accompanying
assessment roll) is in the amount of $34,228.06, which equates to a cost of
$0.094557 (rounded) per square foot of property.
The staff of the Department of Utility Services recommends that the Board of
County Commissioners approve the adoption of Resolution IV, which is
attached, and authorize the chairman to execute same.
SEPTEMBER 1, 1998
-93-
•
BOOK 100 FAGE7"""
BOO 4! ➢ ''Fr 03
SECTION 8 TOWNSHIP
31S -RANGE
39 E
s . usa Mlv
M vao q n iii
PHOTO REF. 5-26
n
(:�� as
INFORMATIONAL Pt
(.J
2.21 Raiff y ��` ... • . �i
NOT A SURVEY
KROEGEL
1 ..
Q : �t\ HOMESTEAD
EBASTIAN k `
K
® ,1
LOT -2 I
w' •
GOV. LOT . 4 .... ��
•'� ti L!M/T5
_ 7a .
1
Riva RUN "C"
SCALE'
0
•"'� O,tCIA
r
•
a �•' � Coy t �
t-
i ' 4.I.aikru• � Mip•Ifft
( ae
,.0
ju3 1 wig*a �J
�.�
3 at •
o
1
'
tot ftalRKo \ , R:v«
at:
_ s
L/M/TS•�UNAT&
1
4
m0Au1� 1�
2 it
�. t.1 • C nc
��=
Osi TUCM",
-
•
REYI810N
M JAN.I,18B6 1 JAN. 1 I002 E JAN. I, 1871 A
N.0 � t
SEPTEMBER 1, 1998
-94-
i so(-,- ffos'
7# PLACE
°
,M,
�\l
/lO!y STREET
R/Mwad ma
s . usa Mlv
M vao q n iii
nit
n
(:�� as
:4 1
(.J
2.21 Raiff y ��` ... • . �i
�\l
/lO!y STREET
R/Mwad ma
3
i '
-�w
2.21 Raiff y ��` ... • . �i
EBASTIAN k `
K
® ,1
w' •
GOV. LOT . 4 .... ��
•'� ti L!M/T5
_ 7a .
1
Riva RUN "C"
•
/ °^�
t-
i ' 4.I.aikru• � Mip•Ifft
�.�
3 at •
eeva►f'e1
61486.
\
1
'
tot ftalRKo \ , R:v«
at:
_ s
L/M/TS•�UNAT&
1
4
m0Au1� 1�
% ;slam REVISION R EYISIoff— . REVISION
REYI810N
M JAN.I,18B6 1 JAN. 1 I002 E JAN. I, 1871 A
JAFLI'197
SEPTEMBER 1, 1998
-94-
ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert,
SECONDED by Commissioner Adams, the Board
unanimously adopted Resolution 98-091 certifying
"as -built" costs for installation of water service to
Floravon Shores Subdivision and such other
construction necessitated by such project; providing
for formal completion date and date for payment
without penalty and interest.
As Built (Final Reso.) weft(—%asbuut>vwoc
RESOLUTION NO. 98- 91
A RESOLUTION OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA,
CERTIFYING "AS -BUILT" COSTS FOR INSTALLATION OF
WATER SERVICE TO FLORAVON SHORES SUBDIVISION
AND SUCH OTHER CONSTRUCTION NECESSITATED BY
SUCH PROJECT; PROVIDING FOR FORMAL COMPLETION
DATE, AND DATE FOR PAYMENT WITHOUT PENALTY AND
INTEREST.
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County determined that
water improvements for properties located within the area of Floravon Shores Subdivision
(110th Street) are necessary to promote the public welfare of the county; and
WHEREAS, on Tuesday, October 28, 1997, the Board held a public hearing at which
time and place the owners of property to be assessed appeared before the Board to be heard
as to the propriety and advisability of making such improvements; and
WHEREAS, after such public hearing was held the County Commission adopted
Resolution No. 97-136, which confirmed the special assessment cost of the project to the
property specially benefited by the project in the amounts listed in the attachment to that
resolution; and
WHEREAS, the Director of Utility Services has certified the actual "as -built" cost now
that the project has been completed is less than In confirming Resolution No. 97-136,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, as follows:
1. Resolution No. 97-136 is modified as follows: The completion date for the referenced
project and the last day that payment may be made avoiding interest and penalty charges is
ninety days after passage of this resolution.
2. Payments bearing interest at the rate of 8.5% per annum may be made in ten annual
installments, the first to be made twelve months from the due date. The due date is ninety
days after the passage of this resolution.
3. The final assessment roll for the project listed in Resolution No. 97-136 shall be as shown
on the attached Exhibit "A.-
4. The assessments, as shown on the attached Exhibit "A," shall stand confirmed, and will
remain legal, valid, and binding first liens against the property against which such
assessments are made until paid.
SEPTEMBER 1, 1998
-95- BOOK 100 PAGE
i
Boa 106 FnE o` u
5. The assessments shown on Exhibit "A," attached to Resolution No. 97-136, were recorded
by the County on the public records of Indian River County, and the lien shall remain prima
facie evidence of its validity.
The resolution was moved for adoption by Commissioner Eggert and the motion
was seconded by Commissioner Adams . and, upon being put to a vote, the vote was as
follows:
Chairman John W. Tippin
Aye
Vice Chairman Kenneth R. Macht
Aye
Commissioner Fran B. Adams
Aye
Commissioner Carolyn K. Eggert
Aye ,
Commissioner Caroline D. Ginn
Aye
The Chairman thereupon declared the resolution duly passed and adopted this 1 day
of September , 1998,
Attest: J. K. Barton, Clerk
2�A L2�'
By
Deputy Clerk
Attachment. ASSESSMENT ROLL
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
By .
T John W. Til t
4 Chairman
m®an Rm Co I A44rove0
110th STREET/FLORAVON SHORES SUBDIVISION
FINAL ASSESSMENT FOR COUNTY WATER SERVICE
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY PROJECT NO. UW -97 -10 -DS
SEPTEMBER 1, 1998
to
FINAL ASSESSMENT SUMMARY WATER SERVICE
110 TH STREET - FLORAVON SHORES SUBDIVISION
PRELIMINARY
PARCEL I. D. NO, I IER SO. FOOTAG ASSESSMENT
08 3139
00002 0000 00000.1
LUI
87,120
$8,237.81
08 3139
00002 0000 00000.2
BARNES
38,768
$3,665.79
08 3139
00002 0000 00019.0
MULLIGAN
14,375
$1,359.26
08 3139
00002 0000 00020.0
BRITO
13,939
$1,318.03
08 3139
00002 0000 00021.0
LANCE
13,939
$1,318.03
08 3139
00002 0000 00022.0
ROBERTS
13,939
$1,318.03
08 3139
00002 0000 00023.0
EYRE
13,504
$1,276.90
08 3139
00002 0000 00024.0
BORSSE
13,939
$1,318.03
08 3139
00002 0000 00025.0
PHIPPS
19,602
$1,853.51
08 3139
00002 0000 00026.0
REYES
20,038
$1,894.74
08 3139
00002 0000 00027.0
OQUIST
13,068
$1,235.67
08 3139
00002 0000 00028.0
MUSSER
13,068
$1,235.67
08 3139
00002 0000 00029.0
HOULE
13,068
$1,235.67
08 3139
00002 0000 00030.0
BARTON
13,068
$1,235.67
08 3139
00002 0000 00031.0
EMPTAGE
26,136
$2,471.34
08 3139
00002 0000 00033.0
ROSTIEN
13,068
$1,235.67
08 3139
00002 0000 00034.0
RICHARDS
21,344
$2,018.23
361,983
$34,228.06
COST PER SQ. FT. $ 0.09455709246
ROUNDED $ 0.094557
JDC
9-1-98
110H2O1.WK4
PARCEL # 08 3139 00002 0000 00000.1 SO. FT. 87,120 ASSESSMENT 8,237.81
OWNER LUI , ALEC Y. & MAY S.
6688 PARADISE LANE (110 TH ST)
SEBASTIAN, FL 32958 - 4716
LEGAL FLORAVON SHORES SUB PBI 4.78 A PART OF TR A MORE PART DESC AS FOLL;
COM AT SE COR OF LOT 25, TH RUN S 21 DEG 20 MIN 46 SEC E 32.23 FT TO POB,
FR POB RUN N 79 DEG 53 MIN 13 SEC E 84.56 FT. TH N 69 DEG 43 MI N 54 SEC E
106.03 FT TO WLY LINE OF PAR 11 OF SAID TR A. TH S 23 DEG 06 MIN 40 SEC E 241.02
FT TO ELY PROLONGATION OF S UNE OF FLORAVON SHORES SUB. TH W
ALONG SAID ELY PROLONGATION OF S LINE AND S LINE ITSELF OF FLORAVON
SHORES SUB 210.83 FT TO SE COR OF LOT 33 OF SAID FLORAVON SHORES SUB, TH
N 21 DEG 20 MI 46 SEC W 182.88 FT TO POB & INC A PARC A/K/A PARC I OF SAID
FLORAVON SHORES SUB, MORE PART DESC AS FOLL: BEG AT SE COR OF LOT 25:
TH RUN S 21 DEG 20 MIN 46 SEC E. 3223 FT: TH N 79 DEG 53 MIN 13 SEC E, 84.56
FT; TH N 69 DEG 43 MIN 54 SEC E, 106.03 FT TO WLY UNE OF PARC 11 OF SAID TR A;
A; TH N 23 DEG 06 MIN 40 SEC W,15.42 FT; TH S 68 DEG 57 MIN 55 SEC W,100.05 FT:
TH N 89 53 MIN 47 SEC W, 95.0 FT TO POB & ALSO INC PARC 11, MORE PART DESC AS
FOLL; FR SE COR OF LOT 25 OF FLORAVON SHORES SUB, RUN S 89 DEG 53 MIN 47 SEC E,
95.0 FT; TH N 68 DEG 57 MIN 55 SEC E, 100.05 FT TO POB; TH CONT N 68 DEG 57 MIN 55
SEC E, 195.98 FT, MORE OR LESS, TO A PT ON W BANK OF IND RIVER; TH MEANDER ALONG
W BANK OF IND RN SELY TO ITS INTER W/ AN ELY PROLONGATION OF S UNE OF FLORAVON
SHORES SUB; TH RUN W ALONG SAID ELY PROLONGATION OF S UNE & S LINE ITSELF OF
FLORAVON SHORES SUB TO A PT ON SAID S LINE WHICH LIES ELY 210.83 FT FROM BE COR
OF LOT 33 OF SAID FLORAVON SHORES SUB; TH N 23 DEG 06 MIN 40 SEC W, 256.44 FT TO
POS, LESS & EXCEPT FOLL DESC PROP:A PORT OF TR A O FLORAVON SHORES SUB, MORE
PART DESC AS FOLL: COM AT SWLY COR OF SAID TR A: TH RUN N Be DEG 20 MIN 31 SEC E
ALONG S LINE OF SAID SUB, 353.33 FT TO POB, FR POB RUN DUE N. 4.27 FT; TH N 50 DEG 14 MIN
36 SEC W, 60.52 FT TO FACE OF AN EXISTING SEAWALL; TH N 69 DEG 11 MIN 51 SEC E,
5827 FT ALONG SAID FACE OF SEAWALL; TH N 64 DEG 00 MIN 07 SEC E ALONG SAID FACE OF
SEAWALL, 37.05 ' FT : TH DUE S 78.72 FT TO AFORESAID S LINE OF TR A; TH S 88 DEG 20 MIN
31 SEC W ALONG SAID S UNE, 4127 FT TO POB.
PARCEL # 08 3139 00002 0000 000002 SO. FT. 38768 ASSESSMENT 3,665.79
OWNER BARNES,ANNA A
6896 PARADISE LANE (110TH ST)
SEBASTIAN , FL 32958-4716
LEGAL FLORAVON SHORES SUB PBI 4-78 PART OF TRACT A AS
R BK 26 PP 190 & R BK'289 PP 510 & OR BK 483 PP 720
SEPTEMBER 1, 1998
-97- BOOK1� PAGE d
BOOK JOG
PARCEL # 08 3139 00002 0000 00019.0 SQ. FT. 14375 ASSESSMENT 1,359.26
OWNER MULLIGAN, RAYMOND & ROSE MARIE
40 MAIN ST BOX M
GORHAM , NH 03581-1325
LEGAL FLORAVON SHORES SUB PBI 4-78
LOT 19 (OR BK 691 PP 1882 )
PARCEL # 08 3139 00002 0000 00020.0 SQ. FT. 13939 ASSESSMENT 1,318.03
OWNER BRITO , PHILIP & PATRICIA
6536 110TH ST.
SEBASTIAN, FL 32958-4716
LEGAL FLORAVON SHORES SUB PBI 4-78
LOT 20
PARCEL # 08 3139 00002 0000 00021.0 SQ. FT. 13939 ASSESSMENT 1,318.03
OWNER LANCE , JOHN H.
10077 DAHLIA AVE
PALM BEACH GARDENS, FL 33410-4708
LEGAL FLORAVON SHORES SUB PBI 4-78
LOT 21
PARCEL # 08 3139 00002 0000 00022.0 SQ. FT.
13939 ASSESSMENT' 1,318.03
OWNER ROBERTS, JOHN J. & MARIE D.
215 PALOMINO DR
BARNSTABLE , MA. 02630
LEGAL FLORAVON SHORES SUB PBI 4-78
LOT 22
PARCEL # 08 3139 00002 0000 00023.0 SQ. FT.
13504 ASSESSMENT 1,276.90
OWNER EYRE , WILLIAM E JR .& RUTH E.
6668 110TH ST.
SEBASTIAN, FL 32958-4716
LEGAL FLORAVON SHORES SUB PBI 4-78
LOT 23
PARCEL # 08 3139 00002 0000 00024.0 SQ. FT.
13939 ASSESSMENT 1,318.03
OWNER BORSSE , STEVEN C.
6676 110TH ST.
SEBASTIAN, FL 32958-4716
LEGAL FLORAVON SHORES SUB PBI 4-78
LOT 24
PARCEL # 08 3139 00002 0000 00025.0 SQ. FT.
19602 ASSESSMENT 1,853.51
OWNER PHIPPS , RODGER
6696 PARADISE LN (I 10 TH ST)
SEBASTIAN, FL 32958-4716
LEGAL FLORAVON SHORES SUB PB14-78
LOT 25
PARCEL # 08 3139 00002 0000 00026.0 SQ. FT.
20038 ASSESSMENT 1,894.74
OWNER REYES , THOMAS J.
6 THREE RIVERS DR
HOPATCONG , NJ 07849 - 2257
LEGAL FLORAVON SHORES SUB PBI 4-78
LOT 26
PARCEL # 08 3139 00002 0000 00027.0 SQ. FT.
13068 ASSESSMENT 1,235.67
OWNER OQUIST , DELMONT & CONSTANCE
6625 110 TH ST
SEBASTIAN, FL. 32958-4716
LEGAL FLORAVON SHORES SUB PB14-78
LOT 27 (OR BK 429 PP 33 )
PARCEL # 08 3139 00002 0000 00028.0 SQ. FT.
13068 ASSESSMENT 1,235.67
OWNER MUSSER , ALICE B. D.
P 0 BOX 1302
SEBASTIAN, FL. 32958
LEGAL FLORAVON SHORES SUB PBI4-78
LOT 28
------------
PARCEL # 08 3139 00002 0000 00029.0 SQ. FT.
13088 ASSESSMENT 1,235.67
OWNER HOULE , CHARLES A & RUTH MINOGUE
6645 110 TH ST.
SEBASTIAN, FL. 32958-4715
LEGAL FLORAVON SHORES SUB PBI 4-78
LOT 29
SEPTEMBER 1, 1998
PARCEL # 08 3139 00002 0000 00030.0 SQ. FT. 13068 ASSESSMENT 1,235.67
OWNER BARTON, MARY
6655110 TH ST.
SEBASTIAN, FL. 32958-4715
LEGAL FLORAVON SHORES SUB PBI4-78
LOT 30 (OR BK 628 PP 730 )
PARCEL # 08 3139 00002 0000 00031.0 SQ. FT. 26136 ASSESSMENT 2,471.34
OWNER THOMAS H. LINDSEY , ATTY IN FACT
FOR MILDRED EMPTAGE
P. O. BOX 20307(1880 MACKENZIE DRIVE)
COLUMBUS, OH 43220-0307
LEGAL FLORAVON SHORES SUB PBI 4-78 LOTS 31 & 32
PARCEL # 08 3139 00002 0000 00033.0 SQ. FT. 13068 ASSESSMENT 1,235.67
OWNER ROSTIEN , RICHARD A. (LE)
6885 110THST.
SEBASTIAN , FL 32958 - 4715
LEGAL FLORAVON SHORES SUB PBI4-78
LOT 33
PARCEL # 08 3139 00002 0000 00034.0 SQ. FT. 21344 ASSESSMENT 2,018.23
OWNER RICHARDS, DOROTHY
455 NORTH BLVD APT A
BOYNTON BEACH, FL 33435-6803
LEGAL FLORAVON SHORES SUB PBI 4-78
LOT 34 (OR BK 764 PP 921)
TOTAL SQUARE FOOTAGE TO BE ASSESSED 361,983
TOTAL COST TO BE ASSESSED
ESTIMATED COST PER SQUARE FOOT ( ROUNDED ) $ 0.094557
J. D. C.
9-1-98
110TH2O4.WK4
13.F. ADDITIONAL ITEMS: ANNUAL BOND
REQUIREMENTS
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of August 21, 1998:
TO: Board of County Commissioners
FROM: Alice White, Executive Aide to the Board
DATE: August 21, 1998
RE: Annual Bond Requirements
$34,228.06
The 1998 Florida Legislature enacted Chapter 98-34, which substantially
changes the requirements for surety bonds by public officials. Concerning
County Commissioners, the law now requires that:
"Each board of county commissioners may by ordinance require
any county officer to give bond, conditioned for the faithful
performance of the duties of his or her office. The amount of the
bond and the bond must be approved by the board of county
commissioners. In determining the amount of the bond, the board
of county commissioners may consider the amount of money or
property likely to be in the custody of the county officer at any one
time. The bond of each of the county officers of whom a bond is
required must be filed with the clerk of the circuit court"
SEPTEMBER 1, 1998
-99-
BOOK 106 FACE B ��a
Ir
BOOK x 06 �,1
FAGc 10�
Since the office of Executive Aide to the Board coordinates the annual bond
payments I request direction from the Board whether the Board would like to
adopt bonding requirements by ordinance or function without an annual surety
bond.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert,
SECONDED by Commissioner Adams, the Board
unanimously directed the County Attorney to
prepare a draft ordinance and bring it back on
September 8, 1998.
DOCUMENTS TO BE MADE A PART OF THE RECORD -
SPALLONE AND KOYNOT OPTION AGREEMENT OF MAY 84
1998
Option Agreement for Sale and Purchase dated May 8, 1998 between Dr. S. L.
Spallone and Arlene A. Spallone and Ronald M. Kovnot and Carol Kovnot and Indian River
County regarding the Archie Carr - Spallone property, which option was exercised July 14,
1998, is made a part of the record of this meeting.
A.B. SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL DISTRICT
The Chairman announced that immediately upon adjournment, the Board would
reconvene as the Board of Commissioners of the Solid Waste Disposal District. Those
Minutes are being prepared separately.
There being no further business, on Motion duly made, seconded and carried, the
Board adjourned at 12:53 p. in.
ATTEST:
t
M—U..A, � I ft
r
Uo W. Tippin, thdii&an
Minutes Approved: L9
SEPTEMBER 1, 1998